More annual reports from PageGroup:
2023 ReportPeers and competitors of PageGroup:
ShiftPixy, Inc.30of organic 30of organic 30years 30of organic years years years years years of organic of organic of organic of organic of organic of organic of organic of organic growth growth Michael Page International plc Annual Report and Accounts 2006 Australia Belgium Brazil Germany Holland Ireland Poland Portugal Russia Sweden Switzerland United Arab Emirates Canada China France Italy Japan Mexico Singapore South Africa Spain The Group has excellent growth prospects across all of its regions. We are particularly excited about the opportunities in North America and Continental Europe. United Kingdom USA MICHAEL PAGE INTERNATIONAL In just thirty years and from humble beginnings, Michael Page International has grown to become one of the world’s best-known and respected recruitment consultancies. Today, we are proud to set the standard for specialist service within our profession, whilst maintaining a personal touch. 16 Chairman’s Statement 18 Chief Executive’s Review 22 Finance Director’s Review 28 Board of Directors 30 Directors’ Report 34 Corporate Governance 39 Remuneration Report 47 Independent Auditors’ Report to the members of Michael Page International plc 48 Consolidated Income Statement 49 Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity 50 Statement of Changes in Equity – Parent Company 51 Balance Sheets 52 Cash Flow Statements 53 Notes to the Accounts 74 Shareholder Information and Advisers 75 Five Year Summary 76 Annual General Meeting ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2006 Highlights Turnover £m 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 433.7 372.6 383.5 Gross Profit £m Profit before tax £m 649.1 523.8 2006 2005 2004 267.6 210.6 348.8 2006 2005 2004 38.9 97.0 66.1 2003 178.5 2002 192.6 2003 22.4 2002 32.6 Basic earnings per share (pence) Dividend per share (pence) Headcount at year end 19.6 14.8 9.8 2006 2005 2004 2003 3.8 2002 5.8 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 4.0 3.4 3.4 6.0 5.0 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 3,758 2,926 2,647 2,359 2,495 • Turnover up 23.9% to £649.1m (2005: £523.8m) • Gross profit up 30.4% to £348.8m (2005: £267.6m) • Operating profit up 46.4% to £97.4m (2005: £66.5m) • £78.8m of cash generated from operations (2005: £65.4m) • Gross profit from permanent placements up 33.9% • • Gross profit split between permanent and temporary placements was 75:25 (2005: 73:27) Basic earnings per share up 32.4% to 19.6p (2005: 14.8p) • Diluted earnings per share 19.0p (2005: 14.4p) • 23.3m shares repurchased at a cost of £83.4m • Proposed dividend up by 20.0% to 6.0p per share (2005: 5.0p) Creating a world-leading consultancy Michael Page International is a world-leading specialist recruitment consultancy. Growing entirely organically, rather than by mergers or acquisitions, we now have nearly 4,000 people in 133 offices in 23 countries worldwide. Our specialist areas are Accounting, Tax and Treasury, Banking and Financial Services, Consultancy, Strategy and Change, Engineering & Manufacturing, Healthcare, Human Resources, IT & Technology, Legal, Marketing, Oil & Gas, Procurement & Supply Chain, Property & Construction, Retail & Hospitality, Sales, and Secretarial. Our clients range from market leading multi-nationals to small and medium enterprises. In each case we tailor our services to provide a bespoke offering to meet our clients’ needs whether permanent, contract, temporary or interim. MICHAEL PAGE INTERNATIONAL 6 ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2006 MEXICO CITY, MEXICO Opened in July 2006, this is our first office in Central America and is running Sales & Marketing, Finance & Accounting and Banking & Financial Services disciplines. MICHAEL PAGE INTERNATIONAL DUBAI, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES Opened in July 2006, this is our first office in the Middle East. The Dubai office covers the region and has had a successful start carrying out assignments in Dubai, Abu Dhabi, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Kuwait and Qatar. It will be looking to at least double its headcount during the course of 2007 and will be investigating the potential for new offices in the region. ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2006 Focusing on strategies that endure Recruitment is a cyclical business. To counter this as much as possible, our strategy is to expand geographically – nationally and internationally – and broaden the disciplines to reduce the dependency on individual businesses or markets. We are always making long-term investment decisions to expand organically, growing existing and new teams, offices, disciplines and countries with a consistent team culture. We underpin this drive by drawing upon the skills and experiences of proven Michael Page management and ensure we have the best, most experienced, home- grown talent in each key role. Culturally it is imperative that we are entrepreneurial, operate within a strict meritocracy, and are team-based, whereby consultants enjoy profit sharing arrangements rather than individual commissions. To achieve this, we place great emphasis on training our people, and invest heavily in technology to maximise both performance and delivery. The results over Michael Page’s first 30 years confirm the success of our strategy. After 10 years Michael Page had grown to 226 staff, 3 countries, 3 disciplines, £19m turnover and operating profit of £2.3m. 10 years later, 1996, the Group had expanded to 734 staff, 7 countries, 6 disciplines, £142m turnover and operating profit of £28.9m. 10 years on, 2006, it has quadrupled with an average number of staff of 3,305, 23 countries, 14 disciplines, £649.1m turnover and an operating profit of £97.4m. So, whilst maintaining this consistent strategy, where will we be in another 10 years? MICHAEL PAGE INTERNATIONAL 10 Finding solutions that are needed Our clients have human resource requirements for qualified talent and the competition is becoming fiercer and more global. Our candidates have huge desires to further their professional careers. Between the two, we are there to ensure the best possible match, regardless of how specific a request may be. The specialised and consultative approach we provide gives us an excellent reputation whereby clients and candidates are assured of maximum and mutual satisfaction. Quality underpins everything we do. To deliver solutions consistently to such a high standard, we are fully committed to the ongoing training of all of our staff and the continued roll-out of superior systems and processes. ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2006 MOSCOW, RUSSIA Opened in October 2006, this is our second office in Eastern Europe after opening in Warsaw, Poland late in 2005. Currently eight consultants focus on positions in Finance & Accounting with a Banking team to be established shortly. Market conditions can best be described as dynamic, challenging and very promising. 11 MICHAEL PAGE INTERNATIONAL DUBLIN, REPUBLIC OF IRELAND We opened our first office in Ireland in October 2006. Based in Dublin, we are initially concentrating on accountancy and banking appointments. The first signs are very encouraging,with a vibrant economy, and a significant gap between demand and supply for specialised staff. 12 ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2006 Putting values that work at the heart of our business There are five values that we believe contribute to our continued success. These attributes are not only the essence of our brand, but can also be found in each and every valued employee of Michael Page International. Pride: We take great pride in what we do. We’re proud of the Company we work for and, most of all, proud of the people we work with. Passion: It’s our passion to achieve the very best for our clients and candidates that drives us to outperform and beat the competition. Resilience: We know that successful consultants are not fazed by difficulty, but instead, turn it into an opportunity to demonstrate ability. Teamwork: By teaming with each other and with clients we improve the quality of decision-making and increase the likelihood of success. Fun: Though serious about our work, we’re extremely sociable and enjoy celebrating our success together. 13 Being recognised for setting the standard A growing number of initiatives and awards are testament to our commitment to delivering quality. We have been voted one of Britain’s strongest B2B Superbrands since 2000, were voted into the Sunday Times 100 Best Companies to work for in 2005 and 2006, and voted one of Britain’s Top Employers in 2005 by the Guardian. Our growing reputation isn’t confined to the UK’s shores. Overseas, the Boston Business Journal has voted us one of the “Best Places to Work in Massachusetts” and Crain’s has named us as one of the Top 10 recruiters in New York City. In 2005, in Australia, we picked up the title of “Temporary Recruiter of the Year” in the Fairfax Employment Marketing Awards. While this external recognition is warmly welcomed, we are also keen to celebrate some of our own internal initiatives. Within our business we vigorously promote a culture of diversity. Our clients expect us to propose candidates for their workforce that have a healthy range of attitudes and characteristics that reflects fairly the society we live in. To this end, we have our own internal diversity policy that is communicated to all employees. We also participate in the Interbank Diversity Forum, striving to ensure that we offer our clients the most qualified candidates on the basis of their relevant aptitudes, skills and abilities and that those candidates are drawn from diverse backgrounds, and by working with organisations like Global Graduates and Race for Opportunity (Rf0) we advance ideas and explore issues on the diversity agenda. MICHAEL PAGE INTERNATIONAL 1 ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2006 JOHANNESBURG, SOUTH AFRICA Michael Page started this operation on 1 August 2006, focusing on finance. Our team of 10 has already made excellent progress and the South African market is reacting extremely well to the Michael Page approach. 1 MICHAEL PAGE INTERNATIONAL 16 Chairman’s Statement I am delighted to report on another year of tremendous growth for the Group with record levels of turnover and profits. At the beginning of April, Steve Ingham was appointed Chief Executive and under his stewardship we have continued our strategy of growing organically, with start-ups in five new countries, opening and expanding offices in our established countries and broadening the disciplines in existing markets. The Group has many opportunities to continue its growth and is particularly well positioned with its strong brand, international network of offices, multi-discipline offering and, above all, its high quality management and staff. Financial highlights Turnover for the year ended 31 December 2006 increased 23.9% to £649.1m (2005: £523.8m). Gross profits grew by 30.4% to £348.8m (2005: £267.6m). Gross profits from permanent placements grew more rapidly than from temporary placements. This movement in business mix, together with an increase in margins on temporary placements, contributed to an increase in gross margin to 53.7% (2005: 51.1%). Given the Group’s high operational gearing, combined with management’s close attention to costs, operating profits increased by 46.4% to a record £97.4m (2005: £66.5m). Profit before tax was £97.0m (2005: £66.1m) and basic earnings per share increased by 32.4% to 19.6p (2005: 14.8p). Dividends and share repurchases With strong growth in earnings, it is the Board’s intention to continue its policy of continually reviewing the annual dividend with a view to maintaining it at a level which it believes is sustainable throughout economic cycles. Cash generated in excess of these levels will continue to be returned to shareholders through share repurchases. With the strong growth in profits, earnings and cash generation, the Board is recommending an increase in the total dividend per share for the year of 20%. A final dividend of 4.2p (2005: 3.5p) per share is proposed which, together with the interim dividend of 1.8p (2005: 1.5p) per share paid in October, makes a total dividend for the year of 6.0p (2005: 5.0p) per share. The final dividend will be paid on 5 June 2007 to those shareholders on the register at 4 May 2007. The total dividend is covered 3.3 times by basic earnings per share of 19.6p. We continued to make share repurchases throughout 2006 acquiring 23.3m shares for £83.4m, including related expenses, at an average price per share of 355.8p. At the Annual General Meeting on 23 May 2007, we will be seeking shareholders’ consent for a renewal of the authority to repurchase up to 10% of the issued shares. ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2006 Employees I wish to express my thanks to the staff worldwide for their commitment, loyalty and efforts throughout the year which has delivered this outstanding performance. Board of Directors On 6 April 2006, Steve Ingham was formally appointed as Chief Executive, succeeding Terry Benson who announced his decision to retire as Chief Executive in December 2005. Steve Ingham, who has been with the Group for 20 years, has been a member of the senior management for much of that time and a key contributor in establishing the current Group strategy. Prospects The Group has excellent growth prospects across all of its regions. We are particularly excited about the opportunities in North America where, having already successfully established a foot-hold, we will continue to roll-out our strategy. In Continental Europe, market deregulation will continue to have a positive impact on our business. With its strong brand, international network of offices, multi-discipline offering and, above all, its high quality management and staff, Michael Page is well positioned in all of its markets. We will make a statement in respect of our trading for the first quarter on 5 April 2007. Sir Adrian Montague CBE Chairman 28 February 2007 1 MICHAEL PAGE INTERNATIONAL 1 Chief Executive’s Review 2006 was another very strong year for Michael Page and I am delighted to report an excellent set of results, my first as Chief Executive of the Group. These results reflect not only the efforts put in during the year, but also the decisions made in earlier periods which laid the foundations to achieve these record numbers. It always has been, and will continue to be, our intention to take decisions and make investments for the longer-term benefit of our stakeholders. These decisions and investments may impact the profits reported in an individual period, but, we believe, they will deliver greater returns over the longer-term. Staff and office numbers We have made a number of new investments during 2006, opening in five countries, hiring new staff, opening and expanding offices and continuing the discipline roll-outs. At the end of the year, the Group had 3,758 (2005: 2,926) fee generating and support staff, operating from 133 (2005: 118) offices in 23 (2005: 18) countries. United Kingdom In the UK, turnover increased by 15.9% to £312.4m (2005: £269.6m) and gross profit by 20.3% to £155.8m (2005: £129.5m). Operating profits were £44.3m (2005: £31.9m), an increase of 38.6%. The gross profits of the Finance and Accounting businesses of Michael Page Finance, Michael Page Financial Services and Accountancy Additions, which generated 54% of UK gross profit, were 14% higher than in 2005 with both permanent and temporary recruitment fees growing well. Michael Page Finance, the largest of the three businesses, opened offices in Sheffield and, in January 2007, Leicester. Michael Page Financial Services had a very strong year of growth and now accounts for around 10% of UK gross profits. Accountancy Additions, which specialises in part-qualified and clerical accounting positions, continued to expand its office network from 32 to 35 locations with new offices in Peterborough, Sheffield and Cardiff. We have a medium- term goal of building the network towards 50 offices by 2010. The combined gross profits of Michael Page Marketing, Michael Page Sales and Michael Page Retail, were 13% higher than in 2005 and combined represented 21% of the UK gross profit. The Marketing and Sales businesses, which operate from 8 locations, produced strong growth from all industry sectors. Despite the continuing tough conditions on the High Street, Retail, the smallest of the three businesses, still achieved year-on-year growth. Michael Page Legal, Michael Page Technology, Michael Page Human Resources and Michael Page Secretarial achieved strong growth of 44% and combined represent 15% of UK gross profit. Legal grew strongly both in London and the regions with new teams being added in Liverpool and Guildford. Human Resources now operate from 7 locations having opened in Leeds. Secretarial, which operates from a single office in London, had a very successful year. Technology, the smallest of the four businesses, operating only in London, has achieved good growth and in January 2007 opened a second location in Weybridge. ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2006 The more recently created Michael Page Engineering & Manufacturing, Michael Page Procurement & Supply Chain and the newly launched Michael Page Property and Construction grew at over 40% and now represent 5% of UK gross profit. The potential for all of these businesses is significant and we are investing heavily in them, adding headcount and opening in new locations. We also had an outstanding year in Scotland growing gross profit by 62%, adding fee earners to the existing disciplines, as well as launching Legal and Human Resources. Scotland now represents 4% of UK gross profit. Continental Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) Turnover in EMEA for the year increased by 40.1% to £223.0m (2005: £159.2m) and gross profit increased by 46.9% to £126.6m (2005: £86.1m). As a result of the increased revenue and high operational gearing, the region produced an increase of 75.7% in operating profit at £34.2m (2005: £19.4m). In France (38% of EMEA), our second-largest and most established business after the UK, gross profit increased by 22%. As a result of the “Borloo” law in France we have restructured our businesses. Page Personnel, which was purely a temporary placement business, can now make permanent placements, some of which in the past would have been made by Michael Page. The businesses were restructured during the second half of 2006, with Page Personnel now making temporary and permanent placements from middle-management positions and below. Michael Page still only does permanent placements, but now concentrates on middle-management positions and above. We have established Michael Page Interim to service senior level temporary positions. Elsewhere in the region, collectively our businesses achieved gross profit of 68%. In Holland (19% of EMEA), Germany (12% of EMEA) and Spain (11% of EMEA) our businesses grew by over 60%. We have also achieved strong growth in Belgium, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Sweden and Switzerland. In each of these countries we added additional staff, expanded existing or opened new offices and continued the roll-out of disciplines. In addition, we launched businesses in four new countries where we saw significant scope for longer-term growth. We opened offices in Moscow, Johannesburg, Dubai and, at the end of October 2006, Dublin. These offices were all opened with experienced senior Michael Page management and we have quickly added additional staff with all offices generating gross profits in 2006. The growth in 2006 has been partly achieved by utilising spare capacity and partly by investment. The better utilisation of capacity is reflected in the operating profits increasing by 75.7% from an increase in gross profit of 46.9%. There is now little spare capacity remaining in the businesses and we will continue to invest sensibly to exploit the numerous growth opportunities that remain. 1 MICHAEL PAGE INTERNATIONAL 20 Asia Pacific In the Asia Pacific region, turnover was 8.9% higher at £83.6m (2005: £76.7m), gross profit was 15.2% higher at £45.0m (2005: £39.0m) and operating profit increased 21.0% to £17.1m (2005: £14.1m). In Australia (58% of Asia Pacific) gross profit grew by 5.2% and operating profit increased by 5.6%. The weak performance in the fourth quarter of 2005 when the business was impacted by an IT implementation continued during the first half of 2006. Following a review of the business a number of management and structural changes were implemented. These changes were completed at the end of the third quarter. While the full benefits of these changes are expected to become evident as we progress through 2007, we were encouraged by the 16.8% growth in fourth quarter gross profits. In Hong Kong, Shanghai, Tokyo and Singapore, we achieved another year of substantial gross profit growth with all locations growing at or above 30%. During the year, we have expanded the office in Shanghai and at the end of the year opened an office in Sha Tin which will allow us to penetrate more effectively the market in the New Territories and across the border in Southern China, particularly the Pearl River Delta. The Americas Turnover for the region was 64.3% higher at £30.1m (2005: £18.3m), gross profit increased by 66.8% to £21.5m (2005: £12.9m) and operating profit increased 81.4% to £1.9m (2005: £1.0m). In North America, following our rapid expansion to seven offices, we consolidated our presence by significantly increasing the staff in existing locations and launching new disciplines. Having previously focused only on Finance and Accounting, and Banking we started Sales, Marketing, Human Resources, Engineering, and Procurement & Supply Chain, initially in one office. These disciplines will be rolled-out to the existing network of offices in 2007. We have also invested further in our senior management in North America, with a number of experienced transfers, creating a regional structure to capitalise on the size of the opportunity. This structure will enable us to expand further with a new office already opened in Hartford, Connecticut in January 2007 and others planned for later in the year. This scale and pace of investment will of course have some impact on the operating margin we generate from the region in the short-term. However, we believe structurally, in the medium-term, we can achieve margins similar to those we generate in the UK and EMEA. We are extremely pleased with our continued development in Latin America. In Brazil, we achieved another very successful year growing headcount and expanding the São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro offices, as well as opening a third office in Campinas. In the second half of the year, we opened in Mexico City, starting with Finance and Accounting, Banking, and plan to start another discipline during the first quarter of 2007. Latin America provides another tremendous opportunity for the Group to expand and we now have some highly-talented, home-grown, experienced staff that can drive this growth. ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2006 Strategy Having worked for Michael Page for 20 years and been a significant contributor to the development of the Group’s strategy, my appointment reinforces the intention to maintain that strategy. I have, and will, continue to place great emphasis on the key components of the strategy and where appropriate accelerate the pace of implementation. For instance, communication across the Group and between the regions has considerably improved with the establishment of an Executive Committee. We will continue to expand organically, gradually diversifying and reducing the dependency upon any single geographic market or individual discipline. Investment in 200 We have made significant investment in 2006, opening in five new countries and increasing headcount by 28% to 3,758. We plan further expansion in 2007, with headcount expected to increase by 21% to around 4,550 by the end of the year. Whilst this investment will be across all regions, the most significant in terms of senior management, office openings and headcount, will be in North America and Northern Europe where we see the greatest opportunities. The investments we have made, and plan to make, will increase the 2007 pre-bonus cost base to approximately £260m including all share-based charges. Outlook The outlook for Michael Page is highly encouraging. We are currently experiencing favourable trading conditions in all the regions in which we operate. During 2006, we invested heavily and this will continue in order to capitalise on the numerous opportunities for future medium and longer-term growth. We have an exceptional pool of ambitious and talented people in the Group, in particular at the senior management level, with the expertise and skills required to launch new businesses successfully, and who are highly motivated to build on our success. With the current near-term economic outlook looking relatively favourable, I am confident of reporting further progress during 2007. Steve Ingham Chief Executive 28 February 2007 21 Finance Director’s Review Income statement Turnover 2006 was another successful year for the Group with all regions delivering strong growth. Turnover for the year increased by 23.9% to £649.1m (2005: £523.8m). Turnover from temporary placements increased by 17.1% to £372.7m (2005: £318.3m) and represented 57.4% (2005: 60.8%) of Group turnover. Turnover from permanent placements was £276.3m (2005: £205.5m), an increase of 34.5%. Gross profit Gross profit for the year increased by 30.4% to £348.8m (2005: £267.6m) representing an overall gross margin of 53.7% (2005: 51.1%). The percentage increase in gross profit is greater than the increase in turnover due primarily to the higher proportion of gross profit derived from permanent placements in 2006, together with a higher volume of temporary placements at a slightly higher gross margin. Gross profit from temporary placements was £87.8m (2005: £72.6m) and represented 25.2% (2005: 27.1%) of Group gross profit. The gross margin achieved on temporary placements was 23.6% (2005: 22.8%). Operating profit As a result of the Group’s organic growth strategy, tight control on costs and profit-based bonuses, we have a business which is operationally geared as evidenced by the 46.4% increase in operating profits from a 30.4% increase in gross profit. This strategy means the Group incurs start-up costs and operating losses as investments are made to grow existing and new businesses, by opening new offices or launching in new countries. The Chief Executive’s review describes a number of these investments including new businesses in Russia, Mexico, South Africa, the United Arab Emirates and the Republic of Ireland. As a result of the increased numbers of staff and offices, plus start-up costs and higher bonuses due to the increased profits, administrative expenses in the year increased by 25.1% to £251.5m (2005: £201.1m). Administrative expenses also includes a £4.6m charge (2005: £2.9m) in respect of executive share option schemes, the increase over the 2005 charge being largely due to the impact of employers’ social charges as a consequence of the 68% increase in the share price from 270p at the end of 2005 to 452.25p at the end of 2006. MICHAEL PAGE INTERNATIONAL 22 ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2006 The Group’s largest category of expenditure, approximately 75%, is the remuneration of our consultants and support staff. Headcount of the Group was 2,926 at 1 January 2006 and increased during the year by 28% to 3,758 consultants and support staff. One of the anticipated benefits of the roll-out of our new recruitment system, which started in 2003 and was completed in 2005, was a reduction in the ratio of support staff to fee earners. The proportion of support staff has reduced from 36% in 2003 to 26% in 2006. Net interest While we started the year with net cash of £13.1m, there is a substantial cash outflow in January every year as fourth-quarter and annual bonuses are paid, and as the profits increased by 46% the bonuses have increased by a similar proportion. We aim to manage the balance sheet with a broadly neutral cash/ debt position using surplus cash to repurchase shares and, as necessary, drawing on borrowing facilities. As a consequence, a net interest charge similar to last year was incurred of £0.4m (2005: £0.4m). Taxation Tax on profits was £31.5m (2005: £16.5m), representing an effective tax rate of 32.5% (2005: 25.0%). The rate is higher than the UK Corporation Tax rate of 30% due to disallowable items of expenditure and profits being generated in countries where the corporate tax rates are higher than 30%. The effective rate was lower in 2005 as a result of utilising and recognising tax losses incurred in earlier years. Share repurchases and share options During the year, 23.3m shares were repurchased at an average price of 355.8p. These shares have all been cancelled. At the beginning of 2006, the Group had options outstanding over 38.1m shares, 21.2m of which were granted at the time of the IPO in 2001, the balance being accumulated by annual grants since 2001 with a further grant of 2.1m shares during the year under review. In 2006, on achieving performance targets, 27.3m share options vested, including 15.9m of the IPO grant referred to above. At 31 December 2006, option holders had exercised 23.9m of these share options. At the end of 2006, 14.5m share options remain outstanding of which 3.5m have vested, but not yet been exercised by option holders. 23 Earnings per share and dividends In 2006, basic earnings per share were 19.6p (2005: 14.8p) and diluted earnings per share were 19.0p (2005: 14.4p). The weighted average number of shares for the year was 334.7m (2005: 336.3m) reflecting the impact of the shares repurchased during the year and the new shares issued to satisfy option exercises. An increase in the final dividend to 4.2p (2005: 3.5p) per ordinary share has been proposed which, together with the interim dividend of 1.8p (2005: 1.5p) per ordinary share, makes a total dividend for the year of 6.0p (2005: 5.0p) per ordinary share, an increase of 20%. The proposed final dividend, which amounts to £13.9m, will be paid on 5 June 2007 to those shareholders on the register as at 4 May 2007. Balance sheet The Group had net assets of £80.4m at 31 December 2006 (2005: £68.9m). The increase in net assets principally relates to the profit of £65.4m, the credit relating to share schemes of £12.4m and the exercise of share options of £38.2m, offset by share repurchases of £83.4m and dividends paid of £18.1m. Our capital expenditure is driven primarily by two main factors: headcount, in terms of office accommodation and infrastructure; the maintenance and enhancement of our IT systems. Capital expenditure, net of disposal proceeds, increased to £8.7m (2005: £6.8m) reflecting the 28% increase in headcount and the opening and expansion of a number of offices. The most significant item in the balance sheet is trade receivables which were £118.2m at 31 December 2006 (2005: £82.7m) representing debtor days of 55 (2005: 49 days). Cash flow At the start of the year, the Group had net cash of £13.1m. During the year, the Group generated net cash from operating activities of £78.8m (2005: £65.4m) being £103.8m (2005: £72.7m) of EBITDA, an increase in working capital requirements of £28.7m (2005: £8.5m) and movements in provisions of £0.4m (2005: £0.6m). MICHAEL PAGE INTERNATIONAL 2 ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2006 The principal payments have been: • £8.7m (2005: £6.8m) of capital expenditure, net of disposal proceeds, on property, infrastructure, information systems and motor vehicles for staff; • taxes on profits of £21.7m (2005: £10.1m); • dividends of £18.1m (2005: £14.4m); and • share repurchases of £83.4m (2005: £34.2m). £38.2m (2005: £nil) was received in the year from the issue of new shares to satisfy share option exercises. At 31 December 2006, the Group had net debt of £3.6m. Treasury management and currency risk It is the Directors’ intention to continue to finance the activities and development of the Group from retained earnings, and to operate the Group’s business while maintaining the cash/debt position within a relatively narrow band. Cash generated in excess of these requirements will be used to buyback the Company’s shares for which renewal of the existing general authority is being sought at the forthcoming Annual General Meeting. Cash surpluses are invested in short-term deposits with any working capital requirements being provided from Group cash resources, Group facilities, or by local overdraft facilities. The main functional currencies of the Group are Sterling, Euro, US Dollar and Australian Dollar. The Group does not have material transactional currency exposures, nor is there a material exposure to foreign- denominated monetary assets and liabilities. The Group is exposed to foreign currency translation differences in accounting for its overseas operations although our policy is not to hedge this exposure. Key Performance Indicators (“KPIs”) Financial and non-financial key performance indicators (KPIs) used by the Board to monitor progress are listed in the table below. Certain of these indicators are used in the appraisal of senior management on a global basis. The source of data and calculation methods year-on-year are on a consistent basis. This is the first year this information has been presented. 2 MICHAEL PAGE INTERNATIONAL 26 KPI Job count data 2006 35,336 2005 Definition, method of calculation and analysis 24,496 Represents the number of live jobs on the Michael Page website. It is not necessarily an indication of the financial performance or prospects of Michael Page International and should not be considered in isolation; the “global” figure does not include all business lines (Accountancy Additions and Page Personnel vacancies are not included). Source: Internal data. Gross margin 53.7% 51.1% Gross profit as a percentage of revenue. Gross margin has slightly improved on last year as a result of the mix of permanent and temporary placements, and improvements in the gross margins on temporary placements. Source: Consolidated income statement in the financial statements. Conversion 27.9% 24.9% Operating profit as a percentage of revenue showing how effective the Group is at controlling the costs and expenses associated with its normal business operations and the level of investment for the future. Conversion has improved over last year as a result of better utilisation of existing capacity, and improved pricing. Source: Consolidated income statement in the financial statements. £126.2k £129.0k Represents how productive fee earners are in the business and is calculated by dividing the gross profit for the year by the number of fee earners and directors at the year end. The higher the number, the higher their productivity. Productivity is a function of the rate of investment in new fee earners, the impact of pricing and the general conditions of the recruitment market. Source: Consolidated financial statements. 74:26 71:29 Represents the balance between operational and non-operational staff. The movement this year demonstrates faster growth in fee earners in relation to support staff. Source: Internal data 119.4% 95.2% A measure of the returns that a company is making from its capital. Calculated as profit before interest, tax and dividends, divided by total assets less current liabilities. The ratio shows how efficiently capital is being used to generate revenue. Source: Consolidated financial statements. Productivity (revenue per fee earner) Fee earner: support staff ratio Return on capital employed (ROCE) Current ratio 1.3 1.4 This ratio is derived by dividing current assets by current liabilities, and is a good indicator of a company’s ability to meet short-term debt obligations; the higher the ratio, the more liquid the company is. The current ratio is in line with our expectations and broadly consistent with last year. Source: Consolidated financial statements. We achieved a higher level of organic operating profit growth than gross profit growth as a result of our high operational gearing. The decrease in productivity is as a result of the large increase in headcount particularly in the second half of the year, as new fee earners can take a number of months to become fully productive. Our ROCE increased this year with the current ratio remaining broadly in line with expectations. These are important measures of our creation of value for shareholders.The increase in the ratio of number of fee earners to the number of support staff has increased as a result of efficiencies made from enhancing our IT systems. Further discussion of the Group’s financial performance can be found on pages 16 to 25. ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2006 Principal risks and uncertainties The management of the business and the execution of the Company’s strategy are subject to a number of risks. The following section comprises a summary of what Michael Page International plc believes are the main risks that could potentially impact the Group’s operating and financial performance. People To continue to attract, train and retain high calibre individuals who are key to achieving these objectives. The resignation of key individuals and the inability to recruit talented people with the right skill-sets could adversely affect the Group’s results. This is further compounded by the Group’s organic growth strategy and its policy of not externally hiring senior positions. Mitigation of this risk is achieved by succession planning, training of staff, competitive pay structures linked to the Group’s results and career progression. Economic cycle Recruitment is largely driven by economic cycles and the levels of business confidence. The Board looks to reduce the cyclical risk by expanding geographically, by increasing the number of disciplines, by building part- qualified and clerical businesses and by continuing to build the temporary business. Competition The Group operates in a highly competitive market around the world. If the Group does not continue to compete in its market effectively by hiring new staff, opening and expanding offices and continuing the discipline roll-outs, there is a risk that our competitors may beat us to key strategic opportunities, which may result in lost business and a reduction in market share. This risk is mitigated by meetings of the Main Board and Executive Committee where Group strategy is continually reviewed and discussed. Technology To utilise new technology or enhance existing technology to support the opening of new offices and the roll-out of new disciplines around the world. Due to the rapid advancement of technology, there is a risk that systems could become outdated with the potential to affect efficiency and have an impact on revenue and client service. This risk is mitigated by the appointment of a new Chief Information Officer in 2005 to oversee all IT strategy and innovation to support the wider business strategy. Legal risks The Group operates in a large number of jurisdictions which have varying legal and compliance regulations. In order to reduce the legal and compliance risks, fee earners and support staff receive regular training and updates of changes in legal and compliance requirements. Stephen Puckett Group Finance Director 28 February 2007 2 MICHAEL PAGE INTERNATIONAL Board of Directors Sir Adrian Montague CBE () Stephen Box (6) Non-Executive Chairman Independent Non-Executive Director, Senior Sir Adrian Montague is Non-Executive Chairman of British Independent Director Energy plc, Friends Provident plc and Infrastructure Investors Stephen Box qualified as a Chartered Accountant at Coopers Limited. From 1997 to 2001 he held senior posts concerned & Lybrand where he spent more than 25 years, 15 of these with the implementation of the Government’s policies for as a partner. From August 1997 to November 2002 he was the involvement of the private sector in the delivery of public Finance Director of National Grid. He is a member of the services, first as Chief Executive of the Treasury Taskforce Financial Reporting Review Panel, a Non-Executive Director of and then as Deputy Chairman of Partnerships UK plc. Thames Water Utilities Ltd (TWUL) and Wales and West Utilities He was Deputy Chairman of Network Rail from 2001 to Ltd (WWU). Stephen has experience of Audit Committees as 2004 and Non-Executive Chairman of Cross London Rail a partner at Coopers & Lybrand, as an Executive Director of Links Limited from 2004 to 2005. He spent his early career National Grid attending Audit Committees, and as a Non- as a solicitor with Linklaters & Paines before joining Kleinwort Executive Director chairing the Audit Committees of TWUL Benson in 1994. Sir Adrian is also a Non-Executive Director and WWU, and formerly of South East Water Limited. He of CellMark AB, the pulp and paper marketing company was appointed a Non-Executive Director of Michael Page based in Gothenburg and of London First, and a Director International plc on 27 February 2001. He is chairman of the and trustee of The Waterways Trust. He was awarded a CBE Audit Committee and is a member of the Remuneration and in 2001 and a knighthood in 2006. Nomination Committees. Steve Ingham () Chief Executive Charles-Henri Dumon () Managing Director – Europe and The Americas Steve Ingham joined Michael Page in 1987 as a consultant Charles-Henri Dumon joined Michael Page in 1985 and with Michael Page Marketing and Sales. He was responsible was appointed a Director in 1987. Since then he has had for setting up the London marketing and sales businesses full responsibility for the Group’s operations in France and was promoted to Operating Director in 1990. He was and has managed the Group’s entry into Southern appointed Managing Director of Michael Page Marketing and Europe and South America. He was appointed Managing Sales in 1994. Subsequently he took additional responsibility Director for all Michael Page’s Continental European for Michael Page’s Retail, Technology, Human Resources and South American businesses in January 2001. His and Engineering businesses. He was promoted to the Board responsibilities were increased to include North America as Executive Director of UK Operations in January 2001, and in January 2006. subsequently to Managing Director of UK Operations in May 2005. He was appointed Chief Executive on 6 April 2006. 2 ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2006 Tim Miller () EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Independent Non-Executive Director In addition to the Executive Directors, the Executive Committee Tim Miller was appointed to the Board on 15 August 2005 and became Chairman of the Remuneration Committee on 16 September 2005. He is also a member of the Audit and Nomination Committees. Tim has wide experience in comprises Gary James (Regional Managing Director - Asia Pacific) and Andrew Wayland (Chief Information Officer). Gary James () human resources and has held a number of senior HR Regional Managing Director - Asia Pacific and business roles in the information technology, retail and pharmaceutical sectors. He is currently a Director of Standard Chartered Bank, responsible for HR, Corporate Real Estate, Corporate Secretariat, Compliance and Regulatory Risk, Internal Audit and Legal. Stephen Puckett () Group Finance Director Gary James joined Michael Page Finance in London in 1984. He was appointed Director of Michael Page Sales & Marketing in 1994, Managing Director of Michael Page Marketing in 1997 and transferred to America in 2002 as Managing Director of North America. He was appointed Managing Director of the Asia Pacific region in August 2006. Stephen Puckett qualified as a Chartered Accountant with Andrew Wayland (0) BDO Binder Hamlyn. He joined Wace Group plc in 1988 Chief Information Officer Andrew Wayland was the UK IT Business Management Director of PricewaterhouseCoopers where he worked for over 10 years in the internal IT functions. He brings extensive experience in establishing IT strategy and innovation to support the wider business strategy, and integrating technology teams. He was appointed Chief Information Officer of Michael Page in December 2005. as Director of Corporate Finance, subsequently being promoted to Group Finance Director in 1991. He was Group Finance Director of Stat Plus Group plc in 2000, and appointed Group Finance Director of Michael Page International plc in January 2001. He was a Non-Executive Director of SHL Group Plc from 2004 to 2006. Hubert Reid (66) Independent Non-Executive Director Hubert Reid is Chairman of Enterprise Inns plc and of the Midas Income and Growth Trust PLC and Deputy Chairman of Majedie Investments PLC. He was previously Managing Director and then Chairman of the Boddington Group plc, a Non-Executive Director and then Chairman of Ibstock Plc, Bryant Group plc and the Royal London Group. He was appointed a Non-Executive Director of Michael Page International plc on 25 February 2003. He is a member of the Audit, Remuneration and Nomination Committees. 2 MICHAEL PAGE INTERNATIONAL Directors’ Report Principal activity and review of the business and future developments The Group is one of the world’s leading specialist recruitment consultancies. The Group’s trading results are set out in the financial statements on pages 48 to 73. Details of the Group’s strategy, outlook and review of operations are described in the Chairman’s Statement, Chief Executive’s Review and Finance Director’s Review on pages 16 to 27. Enhanced Business Review The Company is required to set out in this report a fair review of the business of the Group during the financial year ended 31 December 2006 and of the position of the Group at the end of that financial year, together with a description of the principal risks and uncertainties facing the Group (known as an Enhanced Business Review). The information that fulfils the requirements of this Review can be found in the following sections of the Annual Report: Review of operations Strategy Key performance indicators Future outlook Risks and uncertainties Financial review Corporate responsibility Directors and interests page 18 to 21 page 21 page 26 pages 17 and 21 page 27 page 22 to 27 page 31 to 33 The following were Directors during the year and held office throughout the year other than as shown below. Sir Adrian Montague CBE‡ (Chairman) Steve Ingham (Chief Executive) Terry Benson (resigned 6 April 2006) Stephen Box‡* Charles-Henri Dumon Tim Miller‡ Stephen Puckett Hubert Reid‡ ‡ Non-Executive Directors * Senior Independent Director In accordance with the Company’s Articles of Association, Sir Adrian Montague, Charles-Henri Dumon and Stephen Box will retire by rotation at the Annual General Meeting and, being eligible, offer themselves for re-election. Biographical details for all the current Directors are shown on pages 28 and 29. The beneficial interests of Directors in office at 31 December 2006 in the shares of the Company at 31 December 2006 and at 27 February 2007 are set out in the Remuneration Report on pages 42 to 43. All of the Executive Directors are deemed to have an interest in the ordinary shares held in the Employee Benefit Trust and its subsidiaries. Results and dividends The profit for the year after taxation amounted to £65.4m (2005: £49.6m). A final dividend for 2005 of 3.5 pence per ordinary share was paid on 2 June 2006. An interim dividend of 1.8 pence per ordinary share was paid on 12 October 2006. The Directors recommend the payment of a final dividend for the year ended 31 December 2006 of 4.2 pence per ordinary share on 5 June 2007 to shareholders on the register on 4 May 2007 which, if approved at the Annual General Meeting, will result in a total dividend for the year of 6.0 pence per ordinary share (2005: 5.0 pence). Share capital The authorised and issued share capital of the Company are shown in Note 18 to the financial statements. At the Annual General Meeting held on 27 May 2006 the Company renewed its authority to make market purchases of its own ordinary shares up to a maximum of 10% of the issued share capital. During the year, the Company purchased 23.3m shares which were immediately cancelled. The nominal value of these shares was £0.2m and represented 7.0% of the issued share capital. The shares were purchased for a consideration of £83.4m including expenses. 23.9m shares were also issued to satisfy share options exercised during the year. Substantial shareholdings Fig.1. Substantial Shareholdings Holder Capital International Limited JP Morgan Number of ordinary shares 29,920,612 22,799,873 AXA Investment Managers UK Limited 16,305,201 Barclays plc Legal & General Aegon UK Plc 16,223,821 12,780,166 10,350,000 % of issued share capital 8.98 6.84 4.89 4.87 3.83 3.10 As at 26 February 2007, the Company has been notified of the interests held in more than 3% of the issued share capital of the Company as shown in Fig.1. above. 30 ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2006 Corporate social responsibility (CSR) The Board recognises its responsibilities in respect of social, environmental and ethical (SEE) matters, with the Chief Executive having Board responsibility for Group Environmental Management. The Directors continually monitor all risks to the Group’s businesses, including SEE risks, which may impact the Group’s short and long-term value. During 2006 no signifi cant SEE risks were identifi ed. The Company is also a member of the FTSE4Good Index Series designed to measure the performance of, and facilitate investment in, those companies meeting globally recognised standards of corporate responsibility. The Group’s policies on CSR matters are described in the following paragraphs. (a) Environmental policy The Group does not operate in a business sector which causes signifi cant pollution, but the Board recognises that the business does have an impact on the environment. The Board is committed to managing and improving the way in which our activities affect the environment by: • optimising the use of energy; • • • ensuring the effi cient use of materials; encouraging re-use and recycling; and incorporating the principle of sustainable development. During the year, the Group has continued to allocate a signifi cant amount of time and resource to further identify where its activities have an impact on the environment. A review is carried out annually in accordance with the guidance as laid down by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA), and the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), an independent international institution established to create a common framework for sustainability reporting worldwide. The current environmental report, which covers our UK businesses only, will shortly be available on the Michael Page website. A summary of its fi ndings during 2006 is shown below. Waste • 223 tonnes of waste was generated by UK offi ces. Our current national recycling rate is 24.1% from recycling confi dential paper and toner cartridges. • Through recycling, Michael Page in the UK has saved 939 trees and saved a total of 279m3 landfi ll space. A summary is shown in Fig.2. below. Energy • • • 5,192,345 kWh of electricity was consumed in the UK, which converts to 1,660 tonnes CO2. 3,035,240 kWh of gas was consumed in the UK, which converts to 607 tonnes CO2. Through recycling Michael Page in the UK has saved 16,590 kWh of energy. Water • In the UK, Michael Page consumed 28,438 m3 of water. Transport • In total, UK employees travelling to and from work converts to 2,844 tonnes CO2. (b) Charitable donations The Group made charitable donations of £49,416 during the year (2005: £70,245). Included in donations are amounts made to various local charities serving the communities in which the Group operates. Subject to certain restrictions, the Group matches charitable donations made by employees. It is the Group’s policy not to make political donations either in the UK or overseas. Fig.2. UK Waste Generation Confi dential waste Toners Mixed offi ce paper Food waste and packaging Aluminium cans Glass bottles Plastic bottles & plastic cups Cardboard Miscellaneous Total Annual weight generated (tonnes) % of total waste 56 2 71 11 22 11 24 11 15 25% 1% 32% 5% 10% 5% 11% 5% 6% 223 100% 31 MICHAEL PAGE INTERNATIONAL In 2006, we nominated Breast Cancer Care as our charity of the year. We have sponsored a number of different initiatives and have so far raised in excess of £150,000 for the charity. This has culminated in a team of 37 Michael Page employees running the New York Marathon on 5th November and the sponsorship of a total of 69 runners from other backgrounds. To date, the marathon has generated in excess of £100,000. As part of our UK graduate induction this year, we utilised an organisation called Community Service Volunteers to source and organise a worthwhile community project in which our graduates can participate. The 46 graduates spent a day painting a community centre in North London, which was in need of updating and decoration. The end result delighted the vast range of local disadvantaged users of the centre and its caretaker. Through our partnership with a charity called The Brokerage, we provided paid summer-time employment to a group of undergraduates from inner city schools. The students, many from ethic minority groups, were given valuable work experience and training in a commercial workplace. In return, they undertook valuable projects and provided us with an excellent insight into the values of potential employees of the future. Once again, the scheme received a great deal of praise and positive feedback. During October 2006, we were once again the co-sponsor of the ICAEW 126 Leadership challenge. The challenge develops skills in young professionals but includes the opportunity to work on life-changing projects in rural areas of KwazuluNatal. The trip this year involved working in a primary school giving english lessons, IT lessons and painting a reading room annexe to the library added by last years’ finalists. Michael Page employees formed part of the team. (c) Employee involvement Employees are involved in all aspects of the business. Michael Page International is featured in The Sunday Times 100 Best Companies to Work For and received particular commendations for organic growth, people development and culture and leadership. Communication with employees is effected through Group newsletters, the Company’s Intranet, information bulletins, briefing meetings conducted by senior management and formal and informal discussions. Interim and Annual Reports are available to all staff. Informal communication is further facilitated by the Group’s divisional organisation structure. (d) Equal opportunity and diversity The Group endorses and supports the principles of equal employment opportunity. It is the policy of the Group to provide equal employment opportunity to all, which ensures that all employment decisions are made, subject to its legal obligations, on a non-discriminatory basis. Due consideration is given to the recruitment, promotion, training and working environment of all staff including those with disabilities. It is the Group’s policy to encourage the training and further development of all its employees where this is of benefit to the individual and to the Group. Throughout 2006, the Group monitored the diversity of its UK employees, 83% of whom to date have completed the voluntary request for information. The analysis indicates a split of 40% female, 60% male, and regarding origin, 86% white, 13% ethnic origin and 1% declining to answer. The UK 2001 Census showed a total ethnic population of 7.9%. Similar monitoring will be carried out during 2007. The Group recognises the importance of diversity in the workplace for both our own and our clients’ businesses. We are committed to increasing the recognition of our brand amongst a more diverse audience, and to encourage development of an increasingly diverse candidate database together with our workforce. Our monitoring of our candidate databases confirms that the brand attracts candidates from a wide range of backgrounds. We participate in the Interbank Diversity Forum and work with organisations like Global Graduates where we strive to ensure that we offer our clients the most qualified candidates on the basis of their relevant aptitudes, skills and abilities and that such candidates are drawn from diverse backgrounds. The Group continues to participate in the Race for Opportunity, part of Business in the Community, a UK movement of over 700 member companies whose purpose is to inspire, challenge and support business in improving its impact on society. As a result, the Group has taken a number of proactive steps to enhance its position on diversity and works closely with a number of clients to share ideas/best practice, and to offer expertise to minority groups. In 2006, Michael Page also joined the Employers Forum on Age (EFA), an independent network of leading employers which sets the agenda for age and employment issues in the UK. The membership of EFA lists over 200 organisations, from central and local government to major multinational corporations. Upon introduction of the Employer Equality (Age) Regulations in October 2006, Michael Page was nominated for an award by the EFA for best implementation of the legislation in its sector. Following the release of the legislation on age discrimination, an Age Discrimination Working Party was formed to review the policies, procedures and systems of the Company to ensure compliance with the legislation once introduced. The recommendations made are fully implemented by the Company. (e) Health and safety It is the policy of the Group to take all reasonable and practicable steps to safeguard the health, safety and welfare of its 32 ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2006 employees, visitors and other persons who may be affected by its activities. In order to meet these responsibilities, the Group will: • • • • • assess the risks to health and safety; implement safe systems at work; provide information, instruction and training; establish and maintain emergency procedures; and regularly review health and safety policies and procedures. The Group is being proactive in our approach to health and safety by monitoring proposed changes in legislation and implementing policies accordingly, and as such we comply with all statutory and regulatory requirements. Our medical insurers also provide a 24hr counselling helpline covering stress, legal issues and consumer rights. (f) Supplier payment policy It is the policy of the Group to agree appropriate terms and conditions for transactions with suppliers (by means ranging from standard written terms to individually negotiated contracts) and that payment should be made in accordance with those terms and conditions, provided that the supplier has also complied with them. The Company acts as a holding Company for the Group. Creditor days for the Company were nil (2005: nil) as the Company does not undertake any transactions with suppliers. The Group’s creditor days at the year end were 23 (2005: 30 days). Statement of Directors’ responsibilities The Directors are responsible for preparing the Annual Report and the financial statements. The Directors are required to prepare financial statements for the Group in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and have also elected to prepare financial statements for the Company in accordance with IFRS. Company law requires the Directors to prepare such financial statements in accordance with IFRS, the Companies Act 1985 and Article 4 of the IAS Regulation. International Accounting Standard 1 requires that financial statements present fairly for each year the company’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows. This requires the faithful representation of the effects of transactions, other events and conditions in accordance with the definitions and recognition criteria for assets, liabilities, income and expenses set out in the International Accounting Standards Board’s ‘Framework for the Preparation and Presentation of Financial Statements’. In virtually all circumstances, a fair presentation will be achieved by compliance with all applicable International Financial Reporting Standards. Directors are also required to: • • • properly select and apply accounting policies; present information, including accounting policies, in a manner that provides relevant, reliable, comparable and understandable information; and provide additional disclosures when compliance with the specific requirements in IFRS is insufficient to enable users to understand the impact of particular transactions, other events and conditions on the entity’s financial position and financial performance. The Directors are responsible for keeping proper accounting records which disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the Company, for safeguarding the assets, for taking reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities and for the preparation of a Directors’ report and Directors’ remuneration report and operating and financial review which comply with the requirements of the Companies Act 1985. Legislation in the United Kingdom governing the preparation and dissemination of financial statements may differ from legislation in other jurisdictions. Each of the Directors at the date of approval of this report confirms that: 1. so far as the Director is aware, there is no relevant audit information of which the company’s auditors are unaware; and 2. the Director has taken all the steps that he ought to have taken as a Director to make himself aware of any relevant audit information and to establish that the Company’s auditors are aware of that information. This confirmation is given and should be interpreted in accordance with the provisions of s234ZA of the Companies Act 1985. Auditors Deloitte & Touche LLP are willing to continue in office and accordingly resolutions to re-appoint them as auditors and authorising the Directors to set their remuneration will be proposed at the forthcoming Annual General Meeting. Annual General Meeting The resolutions to be proposed at the Annual General Meeting to be held on 23 May 2007, together with explanatory notes, appear in the Notice of Meeting set out on pages 76 and 77. By order of the Board Kelvin Stagg Company Secretary 28 February 2007 33 MICHAEL PAGE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATE GOVERNANCE The Board of Directors has a strong commitment to high standards of corporate governance and has made significant progress in applying the main and supporting principles of corporate governance as recommended in Section 1 of the Combined Code on Corporate Governance, (the “2003 FRC Code”), for the year ended 31 December 2006. Compliance with the 2003 FRC Code The Directors consider that the Company has complied with the Code provisions set out in Section 1 of the 2003 FRC Code throughout the year ended 31 December 2006, except as stated below: • Board balance (code provision A3.2) The number of independent Non-Executive Directors did not equal that of the executives during the whole year under review. Prior to the departure of Terry Benson on 6 April 2006, the number of Executive Directors on the main Board exceeded that of the independent Non-Executive Directors. However, the Board considers that the collective know-how and experience of the independent Non-Executive Directors over this period provided a balanced mix of skills which matched the needs of the business and was sufficient to ensure proper governance of the Group which consists of an organically grown, single business, producing clear, transparent results. Since Terry Benson’s resignation and the appointment of Steve Ingham as Chief Executive, the composition of the Board now complies with provision A3.2 of the Combined Code. • Meetings with shareholders (code provision D1.1) The Senior Independent Director did not meet directly with shareholders. However, other members of the Board have met face-to-face with shareholders during the year and the issues discussed are shared collectively with all Board members. Additional understanding of shareholders’ opinions is also gained from monthly brokers’ reports. As a result of this information and extensive feedback from shareholder meetings, the Senior Independent Director and the other Non-Executive Directors believe they are aware of shareholders’ views. The Board and its operation The Board of Michael Page International plc is the body responsible for corporate governance, establishing policies and objectives, and the management of the Group’s resources. It is the Group’s policy that the roles of Chairman and Chief Executive are separate. The main Board currently comprises the Chairman, who has no operational responsibilities, three Executive Directors and three independent Non-Executive Directors. All Directors are subject to retirement by rotation and re- election by the shareholders in accordance with the Articles of Association, whereby one third of the Directors retire by rotation each year. All Directors are subject to election by the shareholders at the first Annual General Meeting following their appointment. All Directors are subject to re-election every three years in accordance with the 2003 FRC Code. Sir Adrian Montague, Charles-Henri Dumon and Stephen Box will retire by rotation and offer themselves for re-election. As a result of their annual performance evaluation, the Board considers that their individual performances continue to be effective with each director demonstrating sufficient commitment to their role. The Board is therefore pleased to support their re-election at the forthcoming Annual General Meeting. In particular, the Board reviewed the positions of one of its members in the context of the guidance in the 2003 FRC Combined Code and determined that, despite the length of tenure on the Board in the case of Stephen Box, he remains independent. He continues to contribute effectively and constructively to Board debate, to challenge and question management objectively and robustly, and at all times to have the best interests of the Group in mind. The Board therefore concluded that there was no evidence to suggest that length of tenure was having an adverse impact on his independence and considers that, taking account of these issues together with the other relevant factors contained in the Code, all Non-Executive Directors (excluding the Chairman) are independent for the purposes of the Combined Code. All Directors have access to the advice and services of the Company Secretary, who is responsible for ensuring that Board procedures and applicable rules and regulations are observed. There is an agreed procedure for Directors to obtain independent professional advice, if necessary, at the Company’s expense. The Board meets regularly throughout the year. It has a formal schedule of matters reserved to it and delegates specific responsibilities to Committees. During the meetings, the Board formally considers how and to whom matters covered at each meeting should be communicated and actioned beyond the Board. Decisions concerning matters of a more routine nature are dealt with by management below Board level. The structure of the Group facilitates the day to day running of the business and enables efficient and effective communication of issues to the Board when required. The Chairman and Non-Executive Directors also met during the year without the Executive Directors being present. Each of the Committees has formal written terms of reference which were reviewed in 2006. 3 ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2006 The terms of reference for each Committee are available on request and can be found on the Group’s website. Their composition and the manner in which they discharge their responsibilities are described below. Audit Committee The Audit Committee comprises the independent Non- Executive Directors and is chaired by Stephen Box. Their relevant qualifications and experience are shown in their biographies on the Board of Directors page 28 and 29. The Committee met four times in 2006 to fulfil its duties and included attendance by the external auditors where required. The Committee also met with the external auditors during the year without the presence of management. In 2006 the Audit Committee discharged its responsibilities as set out in the terms of reference which can be found on our website. Its principal tasks are to review the Group’s internal controls, review the scope of the external audit, consider issues raised by the external auditors, and review the half-yearly and annual accounts before they are presented to the Board, focusing in particular on accounting policies and compliance, and areas of management judgement and estimates. for the external auditors to undertake: • selection, design or implementation of key financial systems; • maintaining or preparing the accounting books and records or the preparation of financial accounts or other key financial data; • provision of outsource financial systems; • provision of outsource operational management functions; • recruitment of senior finance or other executives; • secondment of senior finance or other executives; • provision of internal audit services; • valuation services or fairness opinions; and • any services specifically prohibited to be provided by a listed company’s external auditors under UK regulations. The following criteria also need to be met before the external auditors are contracted to provide such services: • the firm has the necessary skills and experience to undertake the work; • there are no potential conflicts that may arise as a Objectivity and independence of external result of carrying out this activity; auditors Deloitte & Touche LLP are employed to perform work in addition to their statutory duties where it is felt that they are best placed to carry out the engagement as a result of their being the Group’s auditors. All other work is awarded on the basis of competitive tender. The objectivity and independence of the external auditor is safeguarded by: a. obtaining assurances from the external auditor that adequate policies and procedures exist within its firm to ensure the firm and its staff are independent of the Group by reason of family, finance, employment, investment and business relationships (other than in the normal course of business); b. enforcing a policy concerning the provision of non- audit services by the auditor which governs the types of work: i. from which the external auditor is excluded; ii. for which the external auditor can be engaged without referral to the Audit Committee; and iii. for which a case-by-case decision is required, which includes all engagements over certain fee limits. The following areas are considered to be unacceptable • the external audit firm is subject to the company’s normal tendering processes; and • in addition to the normal authorisation procedures and prior to inclusion in a tender, approval has to be given by the Group Finance Director and, if the fee exceeds a certain level, the Audit Committee. c. enforcing a policy of reviewing all cases where it is proposed that a former employee of the external auditors be employed by the Group; and d. monitoring the external auditors’ compliance with applicable UK ethical guidance on the rotation of audit partners. Remuneration Committee The Remuneration Committee comprises the independent Non-Executive Directors and is chaired by Tim Miller. The Committee reviews the Group’s policy on the Chairman’s, Executive Directors’ and senior executives’ remuneration and terms of employment, makes recommendations upon this along with the specific level of remuneration to the Board, and also approves the provision of policies for the incentivisation of senior employees including share schemes. The Committee meets at least twice a year and is also attended by the Chief Executive, except when his own remuneration is 3 MICHAEL PAGE INTERNATIONAL under consideration. The Remuneration Report includes information on the Directors’ service contracts. The terms of reference of the Remuneration Committee can be found on our website. Nomination Committee The Nomination Committee comprises the Non-Executive Directors and is chaired by Sir Adrian Montague. It is responsible for making recommendations to the Board on new appointments, as well as making recommendations as to the composition of the Board generally, and the balance between Executive and Non-Executive Directors appointed to the Board. The terms of reference of the Nomination Committee can be found on our website. Succession planning the basic premises behind One of the strategic development of the Michael Page business is that growth is organic rather than through acquisitions of companies or senior people. In order to achieve this organic growth, we require good people. It is therefore one of the fundamental principles and a major part of the philosophy of the Company that we train and develop our own people. This approach creates opportunities for career progression and helps us attract and retain high calibre individuals. Due to this philosophy of nurturing our own talent, succession planning is inherently a key part of the process. We do not make promotions or move people within the business unless there is a clear successor for the vacant position. It is therefore one of the key responsibilities of all levels of management, and not just the Board, to have a clear plan of development for their direct reports. Board appointments The Board follows formal and transparent procedures when appointing directors. The Nomination Committee identifies a shortlist of suitable candidates for Non- Executive appointments. All the candidates are interviewed by the Chairman and the Chief Executive and evaluations of all candidates are discussed with all members of the Nomination Committee and the recommendation is subsequently made to the Board. In respect of the appointment of Steve Ingham as Chief Executive, the Nomination Committee considered an external search. However, in view of the strong culture of organic growth, the emphasis on promotion of capable executives within the businesses, the strength and experience of internal candidates, and the benefits of continuity, the Nomination Committee concluded that there would be no merit in progressing with an extensive external search. As a result of this internal process, Steve Ingham was selected and appointed as Chief Executive on 6 April 2006. Induction and training programme On appointment to the Board, each Director discusses with the Company Secretary the extent of training required and a tailored induction programme to cover their individual requirements is then compiled. Elements of the programme typically consist of meeting senior management, site visits and attending internal conferences. In addition, information is provided on the Company’s services, Group structure, Board arrangements, financial information, major competitors and major risks. After an initial induction phase, updates are provided on a periodic basis. Performance evaluation The Board, as part of its commitment to ensuring effectiveness and evaluating its performance together with that of its Directors and Committees, conducted an internal review comprising initially a questionnaire concerning all aspects of procedure and effectiveness. Following completion of the questionnaires, the Chief Executive met with the individual Executive Directors, and the Chairman met with the individual Non-Executive Directors, to discuss their views and to give feedback on their performance. The results of the evaluation were reported to the Board and where areas of improvement have been identified, actions have been agreed upon and training will be provided where required. Stephen Box, as the Senior Independent Director, led a meeting of the Non-Executive Directors to appraise the performance of the Chairman. The meeting took into account any comments made by the Executive Directors. This evaluation is carried out annually. Attendance at meetings The number of meetings of the Board and Committees and individual attendance by the members of the Committees only are shown in Fig.3. Internal control The responsibilities of the Directors in respect of internal control are defined by the Financial Services Authority’s Listing Rules which incorporate a Code of Practice known as the Combined Code, which requires that Directors review the effectiveness of the Group’s system of internal controls. This requirement stipulates that the review shall cover all controls including operational, compliance and risk management, as well as financial. Internal Control 36 ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2006 Guidance for Directors on the Combined Code (“the Turnbull Report”) was published in September 1999. The Board has assessed existing risk management and internal control processes during the year ended 31 December 2006 in accordance with the 1999 Turnbull guidance. The Board believes it has the procedures in place such that the Group has fully complied for the financial year ended 31 December 2006 and at the date of this report. The Directors are responsible for the Group’s system of internal financial and operational controls which are designed to meet the Group’s particular needs and aim to safeguard Group assets, ensure proper accounting records are maintained and that the financial information used within the business and for publication is reliable. Any system of internal control can only provide reasonable, but not absolute, assurance against material misstatement and loss. Key elements of the system of internal control are as follows: • Group organisation. The Board of Directors meets at least ten times a year, focusing mainly on strategic issues, operational and financial performance. There is also a defined policy on matters strictly reserved for the Board. The Managing Director of each operating division is accountable for establishing and monitoring internal controls within that division; • strategic plan. The Group has a three-year strategic plan which is approved by the Board and sets out the main objectives for the Group; • financial reporting. The Group has a comprehensive budgeting system with an annual budget approved by the Board. Detailed monthly reports are produced showing comparisons of results against budget, forecast and the prior year, with performance monitoring and explanations provided for significant variances. The Group reports to shareholders on a half-yearly basis; • quarterly reforecasting. The Group prepares a full-year reforecast on a quarterly basis showing, by individual businesses/disciplines, the results to date and a reforecast against budget for the remaining period up to the end of the year; • Audit Committee. There is an established Audit Committee whose activities are previously described; • financial and operational controls. Controls and procedures are documented in policies and procedures manuals. Individual operations complete an annual Self-Certification Statement. Each operational manager, in addition to the finance function for that operation, confirms the adequacy of their Fig.3. Attendance at Board Meetings (Committee attendance shown for Committee members only) (resigned 6 April 2006) Total meetings Meetings attended Executive Steve Ingham Terry Benson Charles-Henri Dumon Stephen Puckett Total meetings Non-Executive Sir Adrian Montague CBE Stephen Box Tim Miller Hubert Reid Main Board 12 12 3 12 11 Main Board Audit Committee Remuneration Committee Nomination Committee 12 12 12 11 11 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 2 2 2 2 2 3 MICHAEL PAGE INTERNATIONAL Shareholders are invited to attend the Annual General Meeting where they are able to discuss any concerns with the Non-Executive Directors. When requested by shareholders, individual matters can be discussed with the Chairman or Senior Independent Director. The Group also has a website (www.michaelpage.co.uk) with an investor section that contains Company announcements and other shareholder information. Annual Report The Annual Report is designed to present a balanced and understandable view of the Group’s activities and prospects. The Chairman’s Statement, Chief Executive’s Review and Finance Director’s Review provide an assessment of the Group’s affairs and position. The Annual Report and Interim Report are sent to all shareholders. The Directors acknowledge their responsibility for the preparation of the Annual Report. The Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities is shown in the Directors’ Report. A statement by the auditors about their reporting responsibilities is shown in the Independent Auditors’ Report on page 47. Going concern The Directors have a reasonable expectation that the Group has adequate resources to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future, being a period of at least twelve- months from the date of approval of accounts, and therefore continue to adopt the going concern basis in preparing the accounts. In forming this view, the Directors have reviewed the Group’s budget and forecasts for the next twelve months based on normal business planning and control procedures. systems of internal control and their compliance with Group policies. The Statement also requires the reporting of any significant control issues that have emerged so that areas of Group concern can be identified and experience can be shared; • risk management. Identification of major business risks is carried out at Group level in conjunction with operational management and appropriate steps taken to monitor and mitigate risk; • public interest disclosure policy (whistleblowing). A procedure is in place where staff may, in confidence, raise concerns about possible improprieties relating to financial reporting or other matters; and • internal audit activities. These are performed throughout the year by a dedicated Internal Audit Manager, supported by members of the head office finance function, who are independent of the operations and by operational finance staff on operations outside their own regions. Businesses are visited on a rotational basis and their controls are assessed in their effectiveness to mitigate specific risks. In addition, there is a regular review of these risks and changes are made to the risk profile where necessary. All internal audit activities are reported to the Audit Committee. During the year, the Board reviewed internal audit arrangements and concluded that there is currently no need for a separate and distinct internal audit department. The Board confirms that there is an ongoing process for identifying, evaluating and managing the significant risks faced by the Group and that the processes have been in place for the year under review and up to the date of approval of the annual report and accounts. Board contact with shareholders Communications with shareholders are given a high priority. The main contact between the Board and shareholders is through the Chief Executive and the Group Finance Director. They undertake two major investor “roadshows” each year in February/March and August/September, in which numerous one-to-one meetings with shareholders take place. The outcome of these meetings and the views of shareholders are relayed back to the Board by the corporate brokers, at the end of each roadshow. The Group’s corporate brokers also report monthly to the Board on broking activity during the month and any issues that may have been raised with them. 3 ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2006 Remuneration Report Scope and membership of Remuneration criteria, incentive share plan award and pension benefits. Committee The Remuneration Committee, which meets not less than twice a year, comprises the independent Non- Executive Directors. The Chief Executive attends the meetings as required, except when his own remuneration is under consideration. The purpose of the Remuneration Committee is to review, on behalf of the Board, the remuneration policy for the Chairman, Executive Directors and other senior executives and to determine the level of remuneration, incentives and other benefits, compensation payments and the terms of employment of the Executive Directors and other senior executives. It seeks to provide a remuneration package that aligns the interests of Executive Directors with that of the shareholders. The Committee has continued to review the remuneration of the Executive Directors with regard to the need to maintain a balance between the constituent elements of salary, incentive and other benefits. It receives advice from independent remuneration consultants, New Bridge Street Consultants LLP, and makes comparisons with similar organisations. No Directors, other than the members of the Remuneration Committee, provided material advice to the Committee on Directors’ remuneration. Remuneration policy The objective of the Group’s remuneration policy is to attract and retain management with the appropriate professional, managerial and operational expertise necessary to realise the Group’s objectives as well as to establish a framework for remunerating all employees. It is the Company’s policy that all Executive Directors’ service contracts contain a 12-months notice period. The Non-Executive Directors do not have service contracts with the Company. They are appointed for an initial-term of three years and thereafter may be reappointed for a further term of three years, subject to re-election at Annual General Meetings. Additional details of service contracts are shown on page 46. The remuneration of the Non-Executive Directors is determined by the Board. The Non-Executive Directors do not receive any pension or other benefits, other than out-of-pocket expenses, from the Group, nor do they participate in any of the bonus or share option schemes. The remuneration agreed by the Committee for the Executive Directors contains the following elements: a base salary and benefits, an annual bonus reflecting Group performance, share options conditional upon achieving performance The following sections provide an outline of the Company’s remuneration policy during 2006. Shareholders were consulted on the policy at the time of approval of the Incentive Share Plan in December 2003. Base salary and benefits The Committee establishes salaries and benefits by reference to those prevailing in the employment market generally for Executive Directors of comparable status and market value, taking into account the range of incentives described elsewhere in this report, including a performance bonus. Reviews of such base salary and benefits are conducted annually by the Committee. Annual bonus plan Annual bonuses for the Executive Directors are based on the division of a pool of Profits earned during the financial year. This approach is similar to the bonus arrangements for other employees. In 2006, the bonus pool for Executive Directors was equal to 3.85% (2005: 6%) of Profits earned above a threshold equal to half of targeted Profits for the year. In addition, if Profits exceed 1.2 times (2005: 1.25 times) the targeted level, then an additional 1.3% (2005: 1.65%) of Profits earned above the targeted level is added to the bonus pool. Profits are defined as Group profit before taxation, exceptional items and before the Executive Directors’ annual bonus charges and charges or credits resulting from the Incentive Share Plan described below or other share option grants. The bonus pool as described above is capable of variation by the Committee both up and down, by up to 10%, to reflect the Committee’s view on the performance of the Company relative to its directly comparable peers. The Committee increased the 2006 bonus pool by 10% in recognition of both absolute and peer group comparator performance. The targeted level of Profits for 2006 was £91.0m (2005: £51.2m) and was set at the beginning of 2006 by reference to market expectations and internal forecasts at that time. The Committee retains the discretion to review this arrangement and set different rates and thresholds as it deems appropriate for the business. The target for 2007 has been set and will be disclosed in next year’s report. The threshold in 2007 for awarding the higher level of bonus is set at 1.1 times the targeted level of profits. 3 MICHAEL PAGE INTERNATIONAL three-year period. The Committee believes these are the most appropriate measures of the underlying performance of the Group. If awards do not vest after three years, then they will lapse. Senior executives of the Group who benefit from these arrangements can only receive modest share option grants as described below. The Committee retains the discretion to review the proportion of profits dedicated to the Incentive Share Plan in the light of the growth in the size of the Company, its profitability and the number of Executive Directors. The Committee reviewed the Incentive Share Plan with regards to the Company’s current operations and prospects. Based on the 2006 results, awards totalling £6.1m (2005: £3.5m) will be made in 2007 of which £1,875,000 (2005: £940,500) 31% (2005: 27%) will be for the Executive Directors. Details of the awards made in 2006 are disclosed on page 42. Executive Share Option Scheme The Executive Directors and senior employees are eligible to participate in the Executive Share Option Scheme. No payment is required on the grant of an option and no share options are granted at a discount. Benefits received under the Executive Share Option Scheme will not be pensionable. Share options can only be exercised on the achievement of performance criteria which are disclosed in Note 18 of the Financial Statements. Retesting after the initial vesting period is not permitted for any grants awarded in 2004 or subsequent years. For participants of the Incentive Share Plan, the maximum annual awards are as follows: for the Chief Executive Officer, 150,000; for all other Executive Board Directors, 100,000; and 50,000 for any other senior executive participating in the Incentive Share Plan. The Remuneration Committee has decided not to make any share option awards to anyone receiving an incentive share plan award in 2007. Unlike all other employees who receive their annual bonuses in cash, in the event that the Executive Director’s annual bonus entitlement is greater than 100% of salary, only an amount equal to the executive’s salary will be paid in cash. To reward service over a longer period, any excess above the individual’s salary level will be deferred, paid into an employee benefit trust and invested in the Company’s shares with no matching investment by the Company. Based on the 2006 results, the amount deferred for the three Executive Directors is £1.7m (2005: £1.6m). Such shares will be reserved for the executive and will vest in equal annual tranches over two years (previously three years), normally so long as the executive is still in employment at that time. The profit and loss account for the year carries a charge for the Directors annual bonus paid in cash while the deferred amount will be charged in subsequent years when the shares vest. Incentive Share Plan for Executive Directors and Senior Employees In December 2003, shareholders approved a new Incentive Share Plan for Executive Directors and senior employees. The current level of award is 6% (2005: 5%) of Group Profits of the preceding year. The size of the award pool was uplifted to increase the remuneration and therefore aid the retention of senior employees. Initially these awards are being satisfied by shares in the Employee Benefit Trust. Not more than 30% of this figure is available for awards to the Executive Directors. This decrease reflects the reduction in size of the Executive team. The balance is available for awards to senior employees. Group Profits are defined as Group profit before taxation and before exceptional items and charges or credits resulting from the Plan or other share option grants, as described below. Two thirds of these shares (“Deferred Share Awards”) are subject to a three-year deferral period during which they will be forfeited if the relevant director or senior employee leaves, other than in “compassionate circumstances”. The remaining third (“Performance Share Awards”) are also to be deferred for three years but are subject to earnings per share (“EPS”) growth targets over the three year period. Performance share awards of up to 50% of a Director’s or senior employee’s salary will only vest if EPS grows by an average of 5% over the growth in UK RPI per annum over the three year period. Any excess between 50% and 75% of salary will only vest to the extent that EPS grows by 7.5% over the growth in UK RPI per annum over the three year period. Finally, to the extent that the performance share award is greater than 75% of an executive’s salary, the hurdle will be 10% over the growth in UK RPI per annum over the 0 ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2006 Emoluments The aggregate emoluments, excluding pensions, of the Directors of the Company who served during the year were as follows: Salary and fees £’000 Benefits (Note 2) £’000 Annual Bonus (Note 3) £’000 Deferred Annual Bonus (Note 3) £’000 Incentive Share Plan (Note 4) £’000 325 124 260 260 75 38 35 32 33 12 191 26 – – – – 325 – 260 260 – – – – 653 – 538 538 – – – – 417 – 417 417 – – – – Total £’000 1,753 136 1,666 1,501 75 38 35 32 1,149 262 845 1,729 1,251 5,236 Salary and fees £’000 Benefits (Note 2) £’000 Annual Bonus (Note 3) £’000 Deferred Annual Bonus (Note 3) £’000 Incentive Share Plan (Note 4) £’000 Compensation for loss of office (Note 5) £’000 227 354 98 236 219 63 34 6 12 29 48 30 8 197 29 – – – – – 227 354 98 236 219 – – – – – 441 314 – 432 448 – – – – – 209 – – 209 209 – – – – – – – 410 – – – – – – – Total £’000 1,152 1,052 614 1,310 1,124 63 34 6 12 29 1,278 312 1,134 1,635 627 410 5,396 2006 Executive Steve Ingham (Note 1) Terry Benson (resigned 6 April 2006) (Note 6) Charles-Henri Dumon Stephen Puckett Non-Executive Sir Adrian Montague CBE Stephen Box Tim Miller Hubert Reid Total 2005 Executive Steve Ingham Terry Benson Stephen Burke (resigned 25 May 2005) Charles-Henri Dumon Stephen Puckett Non-Executive Sir Adrian Montague CBE Stephen Box Rob Lourey Tim Miller Hubert Reid Total Notes to the emoluments: 1. Steve Ingham is the highest paid director. 2. 3. Benefits include, inter alia, items such as company car or cash alternative, fuel, cash in lieu of pension contributions, and medical insurance. Charles-Henri Dumon’s benefits also include housing and relocation costs. The annual cash bonus for Board members is capped at 100% of salary. Any excess over this amount is deferred and invested in the Company’s shares which vest in equal tranches over two years (previously three years). The amount of the annual bonus earned by the remaining Executive Directors in 2006, but deferred to future periods, was £1.7m (2005: £1.6m). 4. Represents the non-performance proportion of the Incentive Share Plan to be awarded in March 2007. 5. Compensation for loss of office relates to Stephen Burke who resigned on 25 May 2005. 6. Under the terms of his contract, Terry Benson gave notice of his intention to retire from the Company in December 2005. He resigned as a Director of the Company on 6 April 2006 but remained employed by the Company as part of his notice period during which he was paid a further £0.3m. 1 MICHAEL PAGE INTERNATIONAL Pension benefits Executive Directors are eligible to participate in a Company pension plan which is a defined contribution scheme. Each Executive Director receives 20% of their base salary or a cash alternative. Pension contributions Steve Ingham Terry Benson (resigned 6 April 2006) Charles-Henri Dumon Stephen Puckett 2006 £’000 54 27 39 48 2005 £’000 21 106 38 36 Directors’ interests and share ownership requirements Executive Directors are required to build and hold, as a minimum, a direct beneficial interest in the Company’s ordinary shares equal to their respective base salary. As at 31 December 2006 all Executive Directors comply with this requirement. The beneficial interests of the Directors who served during the year and their families in the ordinary shares of the Company of 1p each are shown below. For the Directors in office at the balance sheet date there has been no change in these interests from 31 December 2006 to 28 February 2007. Ordinary shares of 1p Direct Holding Direct Holding Direct Holding Direct Holding Direct Holding At 1 January 2006 Acquired in year Disposal in year At 31 December 2006 or date of resignation 1,000,000 2,000,000 1,332,997 203,526 15,000 10,884 18,044 11,172 11,170 - - – (11,172) - - 1,010,884 2,018,044 1,332,997 214,696 15,000 Steve Ingham Terry Benson (resigned 6 April 2006) Charles-Henri Dumon Stephen Puckett Stephen Box ‡ ‡ Non-Executive Director No other Director has a holding in the Company. Incentive Share Plan Total award at 1 January 2006 Awarded during the year Vested in year Total award at 31 December 2006 or date of resignation Performance Non- performance Total Performance Non- performance Total Performance Non- performance Total Steve Ingham 57,230 114,462 171,692 34,067 68,133 102,200 Terry Benson (resigned 6 April 2006) 57,230 114,462 171,692 Charles-Henri Dumon (Note 4) 57,230 114,462 171,692 Stephen Puckett 57,230 114,462 171,692 – 34,067 34,067 – – 68,133 102,200 68,133 102,200 – – – – 91,297 182,595 273,892 57,230 114,462 171,692 91,297 182,595 273,892 91,297 182,595 273,892 Details of awards made under the Incentive Share Plan that remain outstanding at 31 December 2006 are as follows: 1. The value of the award made under the Michael Page Incentive Share Plan in 2006 is £313,500 for each individual Director and is based on the purchase price of the Company’s ordinary shares on 7 March 2006 of 306.68p. 2. The total value of awards at 31 December 2006 for each individual Director in office at the balance sheet date is £1,238,677 and is calculated using the closing market price of the Company’s ordinary shares at 31 December 2006 of 452.25p. 2 ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2006 3. For awards made in 2006, the base EPS for the performance criteria is 15.5p (2005: 7.5p). 4. Charles-Henri Dumon was granted deferred share options to acquire 68,133 ordinary shares and performance share options to acquire 34,067 ordinary shares under the Michael Page Incentive Share Plan 2006. These options have a nil exercise price and do not accrue dividends. 5. The non-performance shares to be awarded in 2007 have been included in the Table of Emoluments on page 41. Deferred Annual Bonus As described on pages 39 and 40, in the event that the Executive Directors’ bonus entitlement is greater than 100% of salary, the excess above the individual’s salary is deferred, invested in the Company’s shares and delivered to the individual in two equal tranches (previously three) on the first two anniversaries (previously three) of the grant. In 2007, a total of £1.7m will be awarded to the Executive Directors, representing this excess, and has been included in the emoluments table for the year as shown on page 41. There has been no charge made to the income statement in the year for the deferred element of the Annual Bonus Plan. The charge for the year will be spread over future periods as described in the accounting policies in Note 1 on pages 53 to 57. For full descriptions of the performance and vesting conditions, see “Annual Bonus Plan” on pages 39 and 40. Details of awards made under the Deferred Annual Bonus Plan that remain outstanding at 31 December 2006 are as follows: Steve Ingham Terry Benson (resigned 6 April 2006) Charles-Henri Dumon Stephen Puckett Total award at 1 January 2006 Awarded during the year Vested in year Total award at 31 December 2006 or date of resignation 55,421 91,883 61,255 56,880 143,761 – 140,710 146,202 (18,473) (30,627) (20,418) (18,960) 180,709 61,256 181,547 184,122 3 MICHAEL PAGE INTERNATIONAL Beneficial interests The beneficial interests of the Executive Directors who served during the year and their families in share options of the Michael Page International plc Executive Share Option Scheme at 31 December 2006 were as follows: Date of Grant At 1 January 2006 Granted in year Exercised in year or to date of resignation Lapsed in year or to date of resignation At 31 December 2006 or date of resignation Market price at date of exercise (pence) Gains made on exercise Exercise price (pence) Period of exercise Steve Ingham Terry Benson (resigned 6 April 2006) Charles-Henri Dumon Stephen Puckett 2001 2002 2002 2003 2004 2005 2001 2002 2002 2003 2004 2005 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2001 2002 2002 2003 2004 2005 750,000 150,000 150,000 200,000 50,000 50,000 3,750,000 150,000 150,000 200,000 50,000 50,000 1,125,000 300,000 200,000 50,000 50,000 750,000 150,000 150,000 200,000 50,000 50,000 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – (515,559) (150,000) (150,000) (200,000) – – – – – – – – (833,984) (300,000) – – – (515,559) (150,000) (150,000) (200,000) – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 234,441 368.10 995,544 175 2004-2011 – – – 50,000 50,000 3,750,000 150,000 150,000 200,000 50,000 50,000 368.10 273,150 186 2005-2012 368.10 273,150 186 2006-2012 368.10 573,200 81.5 2006-2013 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 171 2007-2014 190.75 2008-2015 175 2004-2011 186 2005-2012 186 2006-2012 81.5 2006-2013 171 2007-2014 190.75 2008-2015 291,016 332.29* 1,311,757 175 2004-2011 – 328.83 428,490 186 2006-2012 200,000 50,000 50,000 – – – – – – 83.4 2007-2013 171 2007-2014 190.75 2008-2015 234,441 368.10 995,544 175 2004-2011 – – – 50,000 50,000 368.10 273,150 186 2005-2012 368.10 273,150 186 2006-2012 368.10 573,200 81.5 2006-2013 – – – – 171 2007-2014 190.75 2008-2015 * This represents the weighted average rate for the total exercise. 1. The market price of the shares at 31 December 2006 was 452.25p with a range during the year of 265.5p to 452.25p. 2. No options were given under the Executive Share Option Scheme to the Executive Directors in 2006. ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2006 Total Shareholder Return (TSR) The graphs below show Total Shareholder Return (TSR) for the Group and the FTSE Support Services index which, as it is the sector in which the Company operates, is considered the most appropriate comparator index in the absence of a more directly representative recognised index. A comparison with the FTSE 250 index is also given. The graphs illustrate TSR for the financial periods since flotation. Versus FTSE250 and FTSE Support Services 31 December 2001 31 December 2002 31 December 2003 31 December 2004 31 December 2005 31 December 2006 290 270 250 230 210 190 170 150 130 110 90 70 50 289.7 217.9 108.1 170.5 167.5 87.2 128.5 115.7 71.7 112.8 104.6 69.9 100.4 96.9 89.4 75.3 64.2 59.4 FTSE250 FTSE Support Services Michael Page International MICHAEL PAGE INTERNATIONAL Outside appointments The Remuneration Committee recognises that Non-Executive Directorships are a significant benefit in broadening executive’s experience. Subject to review in each case, the Remuneration Committee’s general policy is that Executive Directors may accept Non-Executive Directorships with other companies, so long as there is no conflict of interest and their effectiveness is not impaired. The executive is permitted to retain any fees for the service. Stephen Puckett was a Non-Executive Director of SHL Group plc and resigned during the year. He received fees of £32,576 (prorated to his date of resignation) (2005: £25,000) as compensation for this role. These fees are not included in the emoluments table on page 41. Service contracts All Executive Directors’ service contracts contain a 12-month notice period. The service contracts also contain restrictive covenants preventing the Directors from competing with the Group for six-months following the termination of employment and preventing the Directors from soliciting key employees, clients and candidates of the employing company and Group companies for 12-months following termination of employment. On termination, any compensation payments due to a Director are calculated in accordance with normal legal principles. Mitigation of these payments would be applied, depending on the individual circumstances of each case. Contract date Unexpired term at 31 December 2006 Notice period Provision for compensation on early termination Other termination provisions Executive Steve Ingham 05/03/01 no specific term 12 months Charles-Henri Dumon 13/06/03 no specific term 12 months Stephen Puckett 05/03/01 no specific term 12 months 12 months salary plus other contractual benefits 12 months salary plus other contractual benefits 12 months salary plus other contractual benefits Non-Executive Sir Adrian Montague CBE* 27/02/07 Stephen Box* Hubert Reid Tim Miller 27/02/07 25/02/06 15/08/05 2 months 2 months 26 months 19 months None None None None *Sir Adrian Montague’s and Stephen Box’s appointments were renewed on 27 February 2007. None None None None None None None None None None None Annual resolution Shareholders will be given the opportunity to approve the Remuneration Report at the Annual General Meeting (resolution 6) on 23 May 2007. Audit requirement Within the Remuneration Report, the sections on Emoluments, and Directors’ interests and share ownership requirements, on pages 41 to 44 inclusive, are audited. All other sections of the Remuneration Report are unaudited. Tim Miller Chairman - Remuneration Committee 28 February 2007 6 ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2006 Independent Auditors’ Report to the Members of Michael Page International plc We have audited the group and parent company financial statements (the ‘‘financial statements’’) of Michael Page International plc for the year ended 31 December 2006 which comprise Consolidated Income Statement, the Consolidated and Individual Company Balance Sheets, the Consolidated and Individual Company Cash Flow Statements, the Consolidated and Individual Company Statements of Changes in Equity and the related notes 1 to 26. These financial statements have been prepared under the accounting policies set out therein. We have also audited the information in the Directors’ Remuneration Report that is described as having been audited. This report is made solely to the company’s members, as a body, in accordance with section 235 of the Companies Act 1985. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the company’s members those matters we are required to state to them in an auditors’ report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the company and the company’s members as a body, for our audit work, for this report, or for the opinions we have formed. Respective responsibilities of directors and auditors The directors’ responsibilities for preparing the Annual Report, the Directors’ Remuneration Report and the financial statements in accordance with applicable law and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) as adopted by the European Union are set out in the Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities. Our responsibility is to audit the financial statements and the part of the Directors’ Remuneration Report to be audited in accordance with relevant legal and regulatory requirements and International Standards on Auditing (UK and Ireland). We report to you our opinion as to whether the financial statements give a true and fair view and whether the financial statements and the part of the Directors’ Remuneration Report to be audited have been properly prepared in accordance with the Companies Act 1985 and, as regards the group financial statements, Article 4 of the IAS Regulation. We also report to you whether in our opinion the information given in the Directors’ Report is consistent with the financial statements. In addition we report to you if, in our opinion, the company has not kept proper accounting records, if we have not received all the information and explanations we require for our audit, or if information specified by law regarding directors’ remuneration and other transactions is not disclosed. We review whether the Corporate Governance Statement reflects the company’s compliance with the nine provisions of the 2003 Combined Code specified for our review by the Listing Rules of the Financial Services Authority, and we report if it does not. We are not required to consider whether the board’s statements on internal control cover all risks and controls, or form an opinion on the effectiveness of the group’s corporate governance procedures or its risk and control procedures. We read the other information contained in the Annual Report as described in the contents section and consider whether it is consistent with the audited financial statements. We consider the implications for our report if we become aware of any apparent misstatements or material inconsistencies with the financial statements. Our responsibilities do not extend to any further information outside the Annual Report. Basis of audit opinion We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK and Ireland) issued by the Auditing Practices Board. An audit includes examination, on a test basis, of evidence relevant to the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and the part of the Directors’ Remuneration Report to be audited. It also includes an assessment of the significant estimates and judgments made by the directors in the preparation of the financial statements, and of whether the accounting policies are appropriate to the group’s and company’s circumstances, consistently applied and adequately disclosed. We planned and performed our audit so as to obtain all the information and explanations which we considered necessary in order to provide us with sufficient evidence to give reasonable assurance that the financial statements and the part of the Directors’ Remuneration Report to be audited are free from material misstatement, whether caused by fraud or other irregularity or error. In forming our opinion we also evaluated the overall adequacy of the presentation of information in the financial statements and the part of the Directors’ Remuneration Report to be audited. Opinion In our opinion: • • • the group financial statements give a true and fair view, in accordance with IFRSs as adopted by the European Union, of the state of the group’s affairs as at 31 December 2006 and of its profit for the year then ended; the individual company financial statements give a true and fair view, in accordance with IFRSs as adopted by the European Union as applied in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act 1985, of the state of the parent company’s affairs as at 31 December 2006; the financial statements and the part of the Directors’ Remuneration Report to be audited have been properly prepared in accordance with the Companies Act 1985 and, as regards the group financial statements, Article 4 of the IAS Regulation; and • the information given in the Directors’ Report is consistent with the financial statements. Deloitte & Touche LLP Chartered Accountants and Registered Auditors – London 28 February 2007 MICHAEL PAGE INTERNATIONAL CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT Year ended 31 December 2006 Turnover Cost of sales Gross profit Administrative expenses Operating profit Financial income Financial expenses Profit before tax Income tax expense Profit for the year Attributable Equity holders of the parent Earnings per share Basic earnings per share (pence) Diluted earnings per share (pence) The above results relate to continuing operations. Note 2 2 2 5 5 6 9 9 2006 £’000 649,060 (300,243) 348,817 (251,450) 97,367 821 (1,229) 96,959 (31,512) 65,447 2005 £’000 523,810 (256,229) 267,581 (201,062) 66,519 393 (776) 66,136 (16,506) 49,630 65,447 49,630 19.6 19.0 14.8 14.4 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY at 31 December 2006 ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2006 Share premium £’000 Capital redemption reserve £’000 Reserve for own shares £’000 Treasury shares £’000 Currency translation reserve £’000 Retained earnings £’000 Total equity £’000 Group Note Balance at 1 January 2005 Currency translation differences Net income recognised directly in equity Profit for the year Total recognised income for the year Purchase of own shares Cancellation of treasury shares Credit in respect of share schemes Dividends Balance at 31 December 2005 Balance at 1 January 2006 Currency translation differences Net expense recognised directly in equity Profit for the year Total recognised (expense)/income for the year Purchase of own shares for cancellation Issue of share capital Transfer to reserve for own shares Credit in respect of share schemes Dividends 8 8 Share capital £’000 3,572 – – – – – (246) – – (246) 3,326 3,326 – – – – (232) 238 – – – 6 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 37,952 – – – 37,952 Balance at 31 December 2006 3,332 37,952 178 (9,871) (13,122) (188) 79,931 60,500 – – – – – 246 – – 246 424 – – – – – – – – – – – – – (34,216) 47,338 – – 13,122 492 492 – – 492 492 – 49,630 49,630 492 49,630 50,122 – – – – – – (34,216) (47,338) – 6,922 6,922 (14,432) (14,432) (54,848) (41,726) (9,871) – 304 74,713 68,896 424 (9,871) – – – – 232 – – – – 232 656 – – – – – – 970 – – 970 (8,901) – – – – – – – – – – – – 304 74,713 68,896 (3,116) (3,116) – – (3,116) (3,116) – 65,447 65,447 (3,116) 65,447 62,331 – (83,363) (83,363) – – – – – – 38,190 (970) – 12,425 12,425 (18,088) (18,088) (89,996) (50,836) (2,812) 50,164 80,391 MICHAEL PAGE INTERNATIONAL STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY – PARENT COMPANY at 31 December 2006 Share capital £’000 3,572 – 3,572 – – – (246) – (246) 3,326 3,326 – – (232) Share premium £’000 Capital redemption reserve £’000 Reserve for own shares £’000 Treasury shares £’000 Retained earnings £’000 Total equity £’000 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 178 (9,871) (13,122) 299,688 280,445 – 9,871 – (3,723) 6,148 178 – – – 246 – 246 424 424 – – 232 – – 232 656 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – (13,122) 295,965 286,593 – – 12,793 12,793 12,793 12,793 (34,216) – (34,216) 47,338 (47,338) – – (14,432) (14,432) 13,122 (61,770) (48,648) – 246,988 250,738 – – – – – – – – 246,988 250,738 9,376 9,376 9,376 9,376 (83,363) (83,363) – 38,190 (18,088) (18,088) (101,451) (63,261) 154,913 196,853 238 37,952 – 6 – 37,952 3,332 37,952 Company Balance at 1 January 2005 Note Effects of change in accounting for Employee Benefit Trust 1 Balance at 1 January 2005 restated Profit for the year Total recognised income for the year Purchase of own shares Cancellation of treasury shares Dividends Balance at 31 December 2005 Balance at 1 January 2006 Profit for the year Total recognised income for the year Purchase of own shares Issue of share capital Dividends Balance at 31 December 2006 8 8 0 BALANCE SHEETS at 31 December 2006 Non-current assets Property, plant and equipment Intangible assets Investments Deferred tax assets Other receivables Current assets Trade and other receivables Current tax receivable Cash and cash equivalents Total assets Non-current liabilities Other payables Provisions for liabilities Deferred tax liabilities Current liabilities Trade and other payables Bank overdrafts Bank loans Current tax payable Provisions for liabilities Total liabilities Net assets Capital and reserves Called-up share capital Share premium Capital redemption reserve Reserve for own shares Currency translation reserve Retained earnings Total equity ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2006 Group Company 2006 £’000 21,550 3,598 – 9,447 1,927 2005 £’000 19,666 3,751 – 9,255 1,106 as restated (Note 1) 2005 £’000 – – 2006 £’000 – – 426,777 427,345 – – – – 36,522 33,778 426,777 427,345 143,813 104,935 213 35,587 179,613 336 20,060 125,331 332 489 – 821 15 225 – 240 216,135 159,109 427,598 427,585 (1,130) – – (662) (192) (147) (1,130) (1,001) – – – – – – – – (83,525) (71,624) (191,595) (170,147) (43) (39,150) (11,704) (192) (281) (6,700) (10,223) (384) – – (39,150) (6,700) – – – – (134,614) (89,212) (230,745) (176,847) (135,744) (90,213) (230,745) (176,847) 80,391 68,896 196,853 250,738 3,332 37,952 656 (8,901) (2,812) 50,164 80,391 3,326 – 424 (9,871) 304 74,713 68,896 3,332 37,952 656 – – 154,913 196,853 3,326 – 424 – – 246,988 250,738 Note 10 11 12 17 13 13 7 21 2 14 16 17 14 15 15 7 16 2 18 19 19 19 19 These financial statements were approved by the Board of Directors on 28 February 2007. On behalf of the Board of Directors. S Ingham Chief Executive S R Puckett Group Finance Director 1 Group Company Note 20 22 2006 £’000 78,827 2005 £’000 65,432 (21,705) (10,127) 57,122 55,305 (9,167) (7,167) (737) 1,210 – 821 (965) 1,354 1,353 393 (7,873) (5,032) as restated (Note 1) 2005 £’000 40,754 1,702 42,456 2006 £’000 29,234 2,446 31,680 – – – – – – – – – – – – (18,088) (14,432) (18,088) (14,432) (1,209) 39,150 (6,700) 38,190 (83,363) (32,020) 17,229 19,779 (1,464) 35,544 (773) 6,700 – – (34,216) (42,721) 7,552 12,215 12 19,779 (869) 39,150 (6,700) 38,190 (83,363) (31,680) – – – – (508) 6,700 – – (34,216) (42,456) – – – – MICHAEL PAGE INTERNATIONAL CASH FLOW STATEMENTS for the year ended 31 December 2006 Cash generated from operations Income tax (paid)/received Net cash from operating activities Cash flows from investing activities Purchases of property, plant and equipment Purchases of computer software Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment, and computer software Proceeds from sale of business Interest received Net cash used in investing activities Cash flows from financing activities Dividends paid Interest paid Proceeds from bank loan Repayment of bank loan Issue of own shares for the exercise of options Purchase of own shares Net cash used in financing activities Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year Exchange (losses)/gains on cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year 21 2 ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2006 NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS 1. Significant accounting policies Statement of compliance The financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention and in accordance with current International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with IFRS adopted for use in the European Union and therefore comply with Article 4 of the EU IAS Regulation. Basis of preparation The financial statements of Michael Page International plc consolidate the results of the Company and all its subsidiary undertakings. As permitted by Section 230 of the Companies Act 1985, the profit and loss account of the Company has not been included as part of these accounts. The Company’s profit for the financial year amounted to £6.7m (2005: £11.1m). Basis of consolidation (i) Subsidiaries Subsidiaries are entities controlled by the Company. Control exists when the Company has the power, directly or indirectly, to govern the financial and operating policies of an entity so as to obtain benefits from its activities. In assessing control, potential voting rights that presently are exercisable or convertible are taken into account. The financial statements of subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial statements from the date that control commences until the date that control ceases. (ii) Transactions eliminated on consolidation Intragroup balances and any unrealised gains and losses or income and expenses arising from intragroup transactions, are eliminated in preparing the consolidated financial statements. Unrealised gains arising from transactions with associates and jointly controlled entities are eliminated to the extent of the Group’s interest in the entity. Unrealised losses are eliminated in the same way as unrealised gains, but only to the extent that there is no evidence of impairment. Change in accounting policy and prior year restatement The assets and liabilities of the Employee Benefit Trust were previously reported within the company only balance sheet; in accordance with SIC 12 ‘Consolidation – Special Purpose Entities’ the accounting policy has been amended such that these assets and liabilities are recorded only within the consolidated balance sheet of the Group. The prior year comparatives for the company only balance sheet have been restated accordingly. This has had an effect of increasing net assets in the company only balance sheet at 31 December 2005 by £6.1m with no impact on profit. The net assets, profit and cashflows of the Group are unaffected by this adjustment. With the exception of the change in policy referred to above, the remaining policies, set out below, have been consistently applied to all the periods presented. a) Turnover and income recognition Turnover, which excludes value added tax (“VAT”), constitutes the value of services undertaken by the Group as its principal activities, which are recruitment consultancy and other ancillary services. These consist of: • • turnover from temporary placements, which represents amounts billed for the services of temporary staff including the salary cost of these staff. This is recognised when the service has been provided; turnover from permanent placements, which is based on a percentage of the candidate’s remuneration package, and is derived from both retained assignments (income recognised on completion of defined stages of work) and non-retained assignments (income recognised at the date an offer is accepted by a candidate, and where a start date has been determined). The latter includes turnover anticipated, but not invoiced, at the balance sheet date, which is correspondingly accrued on the balance sheet within prepayments and accrued income. A provision is made against accrued income for possible cancellations of placements prior to, or shortly after, the commencement of employment; and • turnover from amounts billed to clients for expenses incurred on their behalf (principally advertisements) is recognised when the expense is incurred. Interest income is accrued on a time basis, by reference to the principal outstanding and at the effective interest rate applicable. b) Cost of sales Cost of sales consists of the salary cost of temporary staff and costs incurred on behalf of clients, principally advertising costs. 3 MICHAEL PAGE INTERNATIONAL NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS 1. Significant accounting policies (continued) c) Gross profit Gross profit is represented by turnover less cost of sales and consists of the total placement fees of permanent candidates, the margin earned on the placement of temporary candidates and the margin on advertising income. d) Foreign currency translation (i) Functional and presentation currency Items included in the financial statements of each of the Group’s entities are measured using the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates (“the functional currency”). The consolidated financial statements are presented in sterling, which is the Company’s functional and presentation currency. (ii) Transactions and balances Foreign currency transactions are translated into the respective functional currency using the exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the transactions. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the translation at year end exchange rates of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are recognised in the income statement. (iii) Group companies The results and financial position of all the Group entities (none of which has the currency of a hyperinflationary economy) that have a functional currency different from the presentation currency are translated into the presentation currency as follows: • assets and liabilities for each balance sheet presented are translated at the closing rate at the date of that balance sheet; • income and expenses for each income statement are translated at average exchange rates; and • all resulting exchange differences are recognised as a separate component of equity. e) Intangible assets (i) Goodwill Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquisition over the fair value of the Group’s share of the net identifiable assets of the acquired subsidiary at the date of acquisition. Goodwill on the acquisition of subsidiaries is included in intangible assets. Goodwill is stated at cost less any accumulated impairment losses. Goodwill is allocated to cash-generating units and is not amortised but is tested annually for impairment (see accounting policy h). Gains and losses on the disposal of an entity include the carrying amount of goodwill relating to the entity sold. (ii) Computer software Computer software acquired by the Group is stated at cost less accumulated amortisation (see below). (iii) Amortisation Amortisation is charged to the income statement on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of intangible assets unless such lives are indefinite. Goodwill has an indefinite useful life. Computer software is amortised at 20% per annum. The cumulative amount of goodwill written off directly to retained earnings in respect of acquisitions prior to 31 December 1997 is £311.7m (2005: £311.7m). f) Property, plant and equipment Property, plant and equipment are stated at original cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is calculated to write off the cost less estimated residual value of each asset evenly over its expected useful life at the following rates: Leasehold improvements 10% per annum or period of lease if shorter Furniture, fixtures and equipment 10-20% per annum Motor vehicles 25% per annum g) Investments Fixed asset investments are stated at cost less provision for impairment. ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2006 1. Significant accounting policies (continued) h) Impairment of assets Assets that have an indefinite useful life are not subject to amortisation and are tested annually for impairment. An impairment loss is recognised for the amount by which the asset’s carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is the higher of an asset’s fair value less costs to sell and value in use. For the purposes of assessing impairment, assets are grouped at the lowest levels for which there are separately identifiable cash flows (cash-generating units). i) Trade and other receivables Trade and other receivables are stated at cost less impairment losses. j) Taxation Income tax expense represents the sum of the tax currently payable and deferred tax. The tax currently payable is based on taxable profit for the year. Taxable profit differs from profit as reported in the income statement because it excludes items of income or expense that are taxable or deductible in other years and it further excludes items that are never taxable or deductible. The Group’s liability for current tax is calculated using tax rates that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the balance sheet date. Deferred tax is recognised on differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities in the financial statements and the corresponding tax bases used in the computation of taxable profit, and is accounted for using the balance sheet liability method. Deferred tax liabilities are generally recognised for all taxable temporary differences and deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is probable that taxable profits will be available against which deductible temporary differences can be utilised. Such assets and liabilities are not recognised if the temporary difference arises from goodwill or from the initial recognition (other than in a business combination) of other assets and liabilities in a transaction that affects neither the taxable profit nor the accounting profit. Deferred tax liabilities are recognised for taxable temporary differences arising on investments in subsidiaries, except where the Group is able to control the reversal of the temporary difference and it is probable that the temporary difference will not reverse in the foreseeable future. The carrying amount of deferred tax assets is reviewed at each balance sheet date and reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profits will be available to allow all or part of the asset to be recovered. Deferred tax is calculated at the tax rates that are expected to apply in the period when the liability is settled or the asset realised. Deferred tax is charged or credited to profit or loss, except when it relates to items charged or credited directly to equity, in which case the deferred tax is also dealt with in equity. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when there is a legally enforceable right to set off current tax assets against current tax liabilities and when they relate to income taxes levied by the same taxation authority and the Group intends to settle its current tax assets and liabilities on a net basis k) Pension costs The Group operates defined contribution pension schemes. The assets of the schemes are held separately from those of the Group in independently administered funds. The pension costs charged to the income statement represent the contributions payable by the Group to the funds during each period. l) Leased assets Leases are classified as finance leases whenever the terms of the lease transfer substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership to the lessee. All other leases are classified as operating leases. Assets held under finance leases are recognised as assets of the Group at their fair value at the inception of the lease or, if lower, at the present value of the minimum lease payments. The corresponding liability to the lessor is included in the balance sheet as a finance lease obligation. Lease payments are apportioned between finance charges and reduction of the lease obligation so as to achieve a constant rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability. Finance charges are charged to profit or loss. Leases in which a significant portion of the risks and rewards of ownership are retained by the lessor are classed as operating leases. Rentals under operating leases are charged to the income statement on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. Benefits received and receivable as an incentive to enter into an operating lease are also spread on a straight-line basis over the lease term. MICHAEL PAGE INTERNATIONAL NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS 1. Significant accounting policies (continued) m) Segment reporting The consolidated entity operates in one business segment being that of recruitment services (primary segment). As a result no additional business segment information is required to be provided. The consolidated entity operates in four geographic segments (secondary segment), the United Kingdom, EMEA, Asia Pacific and the Americas. n) Dividend distribution Dividend distribution to the Company’s shareholders is recognised as a liability in the Group’s financial statements in the period in which the dividends are approved by the Company’s shareholders. o) Share-based compensation The Group operates a number of equity-settled, share-based compensation plans. Their subsequent accounting treatments are described below: (i) Share option schemes The fair value of the employee services received in exchange for the grant of the options is recognised as an expense. The total amount to be expensed over the vesting period is determined by reference to the fair value of the options granted, excluding the impact of any non-market vesting conditions (for example, earnings per share). Non-market vesting conditions are included in assumptions about the number of options that are expected to become exercisable. At each balance sheet date, the estimate of the number of options that are expected to become exercisable is revised. The Group recognises the impact of the revision of original estimates, if any, in the income statement, and the corresponding adjustment to equity over the remaining vesting period. (ii) Deferred Annual Bonus and Long Term Incentive Plans Where deferred awards are made to Directors and senior executives under either the Incentive Share Plan or the Annual Bonus Scheme, to reflect that the awards are for services over a longer period, the value of the expected award is charged to the income statement on a straight-line basis over the vesting period to which the award relates. p) Cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents includes cash-in-hand, deposits held at call with banks, and other short-term highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less. Bank overdrafts that are repayable on demand and form an integral part of the Group’s cash management are included as a component of cash and cash equivalents for the purpose of the statement of cash flows. q) Repurchase of share capital When share capital recognised as equity is repurchased, the amount of the consideration paid, including any directly attributable costs, is recognised as a change in equity. r) Provisions A provision is recognised in the balance sheet when the Group has a present legal or constructive obligation as a result of a past event, and it is probable that an outflow of economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation. Provisions are measured at the Directors’ best estimate of the expenditure required to settle the obligation at the balance sheet date, and are discounted to present value where the effect is material. s) Trade and other payables Trade and other payables are stated at cost. t) Borrowing costs All borrowing costs are accrued in the income statement on a time basis. u) Financial instruments: recognition and measurement The Group has no derivative contracts at the balance sheet date and therefore the requirements of the recognition criteria under IAS 39 are not relevant to the Group. 6 ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2006 1. Significant accounting policies (continued) v) Critical accounting estimates and judgements The preparation of financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires the use of certain critical accounting estimates and judgements. It also requires management to exercise judgement in the process of applying the Company’s accounting policies. Estimates and judgements are continually evaluated and are based on historical experience and other factors, including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Management anticipate that any estimates and judgements made do not have a material effect on the results. In particular, information about significant areas of estimation uncertainty and critical judgements in applying accounting policies that have the most significant effect on the amount recognised in the financial statements are described in the following notes: • Note 1 – revenue recognition • Note 17 – utilisation of tax losses • Note 18 – measurement of share-based payments w) New standards and interpretations not yet adopted At the date of authorisation of these financial statements, the following Standards and Interpretations which have not been applied in these financial statements were in issue but not yet effective: IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures; and the related amendment to IAS 1 on capital disclosures IFRIC 4 Determining whether an Arrangement contains a Lease IFRIC 7 Applying the Restatement Approach under IAS 29 IFRIC 8 Scope of IFRS 2 Share-based Payment IFRIC 9 Reassessment of Embedded Derivatives IFRIC 10 Interim Financial Reporting and Impairment. The Directors anticipate that the adoption of the Standards and Interpretations in future periods will have no impact on the financial statements of the Group except for additional disclosures when the relevant Standards come into effect for periods commencing on or after 1 January 2007. 2. Segment reporting The consolidated entity operates in one business segment, being that of recruitment services, and this is the Group’s primary segment. As a result, no additional business segment information is required to be provided. The Group’s secondary segment is geography. The segment results by geography are shown below: (a) Turnover, gross profit and operating profit by geographic region United Kingdom EMEA Asia Pacific Australia Other Total Americas Turnover Gross Profit Operating Profit 2006 £’000 2005 £’000 2006 £’000 2005 £’000 2006 £’000 2005 £’000 312,408 269,623 155,811 129,535 44,270 31,939 222,993 159,157 126,577 63,208 20,370 83,578 30,081 61,152 15,565 76,717 18,313 26,017 18,944 44,961 21,468 86,138 24,722 14,315 39,037 12,871 34,171 19,449 8,982 8,077 8,509 5,593 17,059 14,102 1,867 1,029 649,060 523,810 348,817 267,581 97,367 66,519 The above analysis by destination is not materially different to analysis by origin. MICHAEL PAGE INTERNATIONAL NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS 2. Segment reporting (continued) The analysis below is of the carrying amount of segment assets, segment liabilities and capital expenditure. Segment assets and liabilities include items directly attributable to a segment as well as those that can be allocated on a reasonable basis. The individual geographic segments exclude income tax assets and liabilities. Capital expenditure comprises additions to property, plant and equipment, motor vehicles and computer hardware/software. (b) Segment assets, segment liabilities and capital expenditure by geographic region Total Assets Total Liabilities Capital Expenditure United Kingdom EMEA Asia Pacific Australia Other Total Americas 2006 £’000 2005 £’000 2006 £’000 2005 £’000 88,364 66,379 73,228 39,159 91,281 14,592 10,165 24,757 11,520 64,932 12,256 6,877 19,133 8,329 39,734 31,648 5,457 2,251 7,708 3,370 5,547 1,694 7,241 1,942 Segment assets/liabilities/capital expenditure 215,922 158,773 124,040 79,990 Income tax 213 336 11,704 216,135 159,109 135,744 10,223 90,213 (c) Turnover and gross profit by discipline 2006 £’000 3,113 3,899 958 386 1,344 1,548 9,904 2005 £’000 3,117 2,403 773 584 1,357 1,255 8,132 Finance and Accounting Marketing, Sales and Retail Legal, Technology, HR, Secretarial and Other Engineering, Property & Construction, Procurement & Supply Chain Turnover Gross Profit 2006 £’000 408,250 100,153 96,595 44,062 2005 £’000 2006 £’000 2005 £’000 336,207 202,542 159,463 84,591 69,740 33,272 67,863 46,655 31,757 55,111 31,833 21,174 649,060 523,810 348,817 267,581 (d) Turnover and gross profit generated from permanent and temporary placements Permanent Temporary Turnover Gross Profit 2006 £’000 276,346 372,714 649,060 2005 £’000 205,482 318,328 523,810 2006 £’000 2005 £’000 261,000 194,967 87,817 72,614 348,817 267,581 The above analyses in notes (a) by operating profit by geographic region, (b) segment liabilities by geographic region, (c) turnover and gross profit by discipline (being the professions of candidates placed) and (d) turnover and gross profit generated from permanent and temporary placements have been included as additional disclosure over and above the requirements of IAS14 “Segment Reporting”. Note (d) turnover and gross profit generated from permanent and temporary placements has been included this year for the purpose of additional information. ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2006 3. Other operating expenses Profit for the year is stated after charging/(crediting): Employment costs (Note 4) Exchange loss Depreciation of property, plant and equipment - owned Amortisation of computer software Fees payable to the company’s auditors for the audit of the company’s annual accounts Fees payable to the company’s auditors and their associates for other services to the group: - The audit of the company’s subsidiaries pursuant to legislation Total audit fees - Other services pursuant to legislation - Tax services - Other services Total non-audit fees Profit on disposal of property, plant and equipment, and computer software Profit on disposal of business Operating lease rentals - land and buildings - plant and machinery . Employee information 2006 £’000 2005 £’000 168,792 139,697 124 5,630 815 63 362 425 27 245 46 318 (48) – 141 5,201 961 59 355 414 26 191 – 217 (183) (622) 13,543 2,505 12,026 1,574 The average number of employees (including Executive Directors) during the year and total number of employees (including Executive Directors) at 31 December 2006 were as follows: Management Client services Administration Consultants for contract hire (Note a) 2006 Average No. 2005 Average No. 2006 Total No. 2005 Total No. 123 2,261 921 3,305 – 3,305 96 1,806 846 2,748 53 2,801 141 2,623 994 3,758 – 3,758 104 1,971 851 2,926 – 2,926 Note a: The business in which the Group employed consultants for contract hire was disposed of during 2005. (See Note 22 Disposal of business). Employment costs (including Directors’ emoluments) comprised: Wages and salaries Social security costs Pension costs - defined contribution plans Equity settled transactions 2006 £’000 2005 £’000 140,806 115,602 18,366 16,781 5,141 4,479 4,620 2,694 168,792 139,697 Details of Directors’ remuneration for the year are provided in the Directors’ Remuneration Report on pages 39 to 46. No staff are employed by the parent company (2005: nil) hence no remuneration has been disclosed. MICHAEL PAGE INTERNATIONAL NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS . Financial income/(expenses) Financial income Bank interest receivable Financial expenses Bank interest payable 2006 £’000 2005 £’000 821 393 (1,229) (776) 6. Taxation on profits on ordinary activities The charge for taxation is based on the annual tax rate of 32.5% on profit before tax (2005: 25.0% before exceptional items). Analysis of charge in year UK income tax at 30% for year Adjustments in respect of prior periods Overseas income tax Deferred tax expense Origination and reversal of temporary differences Reduction in tax rate Benefit of tax losses recognised Deferred tax expense Total income tax expense in the income statement Reconciliation of effective tax rate Profit before taxation Profit on ordinary activities before tax multiplied by the standard rate of corporation tax in the UK Effects of: Disallowable items and other permanent timing differences Unrelieved overseas losses Utilisation of losses not previously recognised Recognition of further losses not previously recognised Higher tax rates on overseas earnings Adjustment to tax charge in respect of prior periods Tax expense and effective rate for the year Tax recognised directly in equity Relating to equity settled transactions 2006 £’000 96,959 29,088 594 361 (191) (948) 1,637 971 31,512 % 30.0 0.6 0.4 (0.2) (1.0) 1.7 1.0 32.5 2006 £’000 17,694 1,228 14,515 33,437 (1,168) 31 (788) (1,925) 31,512 2005 £’000 66,136 19,841 557 332 (1,966) (2,621) 483 (120) 16,506 2005 £’000 12,522 (120) 7,334 19,736 (609) – (2,621) (3,230) 16,506 % 30.0 0.9 0.5 (3.0) (4.0) 0.7 (0.1) 25.0 2006 £’000 2005 £’000 (8,302) (4,228) 60 ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2006 . Current tax assets and liabilities The current tax asset of £0.2m (2005: £0.3m), and current tax liability of £11.7m (2005: £10.2m) represent the amount of income taxes recoverable and payable in respect of current and prior periods. . Dividends Amounts recognised as distributions to equity holders in the year: Final dividend for the year ended 31 December 2005 of 3.5p per ordinary share (2004: 2.75p) Interim dividend for the year ended 31 December 2006 of 1.8p per ordinary share (2005: 1.5p) 2006 £’000 12,100 5,988 18,088 2005 £’000 9,444 4,988 14,432 Amounts proposed as distributions to equity holders in the year: Proposed final dividend for the year ended 31 December 2006 of 4.2p per ordinary share (2005: 3.5p) 13,859 11,497 The proposed final dividend had not been approved by shareholders at 31 December 2006 and therefore has not been included as a liability. The comparative final dividend at 31 December 2005 was also not recognised as a liability in the prior year. The proposed final dividend of 4.2p (2005: 3.5p) per ordinary share will be paid on 5 June 2007 to shareholders on the register at the close of business on 4 May 2007, subject to approval by shareholders. When the Company pays a dividend to shareholders, there may be income tax consequences. The impact will depend upon the individual circumstances of the shareholder. . Earnings per ordinary share The calculation of the basic and diluted earnings per share is based on the following data: Earnings Earnings for basic and diluted earnings per share (£‘000) Number of shares Weighted average number of shares used for basic earnings per share (‘000) Dilution effect of share plans (‘000) Diluted weighted average number of shares used for diluted earnings per share (‘000) Basic earnings per share (pence) Diluted earnings per share (pence) The above results relate to continuing operations. Basic 2006 65,447 2005 49,630 334,744 336,283 8,888 9,014 343,632 345,297 19.6 19.0 14.8 14.4 Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing the profit attributable to equity holders of the Company by the weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue during the year, excluding ordinary shares purchased by the Company and held in the EBT reserve. 61 MICHAEL PAGE INTERNATIONAL NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS . Earnings per ordinary share (continued) Diluted Diluted earnings per share is calculated adjusting the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding to assume conversion of all dilutive potential ordinary shares. This calculation determines the number of shares that could have been acquired at fair value (determined as the average market price of the Company’s shares) based on the monetary value of the subscription rights attached to the outstanding share options. The number of shares calculated in the basic earnings per share is then adjusted to reflect the number of shares deemed to be issued for nil consideration as a result of the potential exercise of existing share options. The remaining share options that are currently not dilutive and hence excluded from the dilutive earnings per share calculation remain potentially dilutive until they are either exercised or they lapse. Potential future ordinary share transactions It remains the Company’s intention to use surplus cash to repurchase and cancel its shares. 10. Property, plant and equipment Group Cost At 1 January Additions Disposals Effect of movements in foreign exchange (322) (697) 2006 Leasehold improvements £’000 Furniture, fixtures and equipment £’000 Motor vehicles £’000 Leasehold improvements £’000 Total £’000 2005 Furniture, fixtures and equipment £’000 Motor vehicles £’000 Total £’000 15,953 27,639 2,125 45,717 14,426 25,586 3,454 43,466 3,217 4,953 (1,763) (1,453) 997 (855) (26) 9,167 (4,071) (1,045) 2,091 (546) (18) 4,083 993 7,167 (2,155) (2,341) (5,042) 125 19 126 17,085 30,442 2,241 49,768 15,953 27,639 2,125 45,717 7,824 2,016 17,505 3,062 722 552 26,051 5,630 (1,069) (1,353) (483) (2,905) 16,553 2,875 1,625 24,727 552 5,201 (1,955) (1,442) (3,897) (157) 8,614 (397) 18,817 (4) 787 (558) 32 28,218 7,824 17,505 (13) 722 20 26,051 6,549 1,774 (500) 1 8,471 11,625 1,454 21,550 8,129 10,134 1,403 19,666 At 31 December Depreciation At 1 January Charge for the year Disposals Effect of movements in foreign exchange At 31 December Net book value At 31 December 62 ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2006 11. Intangible assets Group Cost At 1 January Additions Disposals Effect of movements in foreign exchange At 31 December Amortisation At 1 January Charge for the year Impairment Disposals Effect of movements in foreign exchange At 31 December Net book value At 31 December Impairment tests for goodwill 2006 2005 Computer software £’000 Goodwill £’000 Total £’000 Computer software £’000 Goodwill £’000 Total £’000 5,347 737 (3) (150) 5,931 3,135 815 – (2) (76) 3,872 1,539 – – – 1,539 – – – – – – 6,886 737 (3) (150) 7,470 3,135 815 – (2) (76) 3,872 4,596 965 (244) 30 5,347 2,402 961 – (218) (10) 3,135 1,539 – – – 1,539 – – – – – – 6,135 965 (244) 30 6,886 2,402 961 – (218) (10) 3,135 2,059 1,539 3,598 2,212 1,539 3,751 Goodwill is allocated to the Group’s cash-generating units (CGUs) identified according to the country of operation. A summary of the goodwill allocation is presented below. UK USA Singapore 2006 £’000 1,274 214 51 1,539 2005 £’000 1,274 214 51 1,539 In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are calculated by preparing cash flow forecasts derived from the most recent financial budget and an assumed growth rate of 5%, which does not exceed the long-term average growth rate of the relevant markets. The terminal value of the cash flow is then calculated by discounting using the Group’s weighted average cost of capital (8%). If the recoverable amount of an asset is estimated to be less than its carrying amount, the carrying amount of the asset is reduced to its recoverable amount. An impairment loss is recognised as an expense. The Group tests goodwill annually for impairment, or more frequently if there are indications that goodwill might be impaired. It is the opinion of the Directors that at 31 December 2006 there was no impairment of intangible assets. 12. Investments Company Cost At 1 January 2006 (as restated) Derecognised on vesting of LTIP’s and deferred bonus shares At 31 December 2006 Subsidiary undertakings £’000 Total £’000 427,345 427,345 (568) (568) 426,777 426,777 The derecognition of assets represents the decrease of the parent company’s holding of own shares which have vested and transferred to beneficial holders. 63 MICHAEL PAGE INTERNATIONAL NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS 12. Investments (continued) The Company’s principal subsidiary undertakings at 31 December 2006, their principal activities and countries of incorporation are set out below: Name of undertaking Michael Page Recruitment Group Limited Michael Page Holdings Limited Michael Page International Recruitment Limited* Michael Page UK Limited Michael Page Limited Accountancy Additions Limited Michael Page International (Belgium) NV/SA Page Interim (Belgium) NV/SA Michael Page International (France) SAS Page Personnel SAS Michael Page International (Deutschland) GmbH Michael Page International (Ireland) Limited Michael Page International Italia Srl Page Personnel Italia SpA Michael Page International (Nederland) BV Page Interim BV Michael Page International (Poland) Sp.Z.O.O Michael Page International Empressa de Trabalho Temporário e Serviços de Consultadoria Lda LLC Michael Page International RU Michael Page International (SA) (Pty) Limited Michael Page International (Espana) SA Page Personnel (Espana) SA Michael Page International (Sweden) AB Michael Page International (Switzerland) SA Michael Page International (UAE) Limited Michael Page International (Australia) Pty Limited Michael Page International (Hong Kong) Limited Michael Page International (Japan) K.K. Michael Page International Pte Limited* Michael Page International (Brasil) SC Ltda Michael Page International Canada Limited Michael Page International Mexico Reclutamiento Especializado, S.A. de C.V. Country of incorporation Principal activity United Kingdom United Kingdom United Kingdom United Kingdom United Kingdom United Kingdom Belgium Belgium France France Germany Ireland Italy Italy Netherlands Netherlands Poland Portugal Russia Holding company Support services Recruitment consultancy Recruitment consultancy Recruitment consultancy Recruitment consultancy Recruitment consultancy Recruitment consultancy Recruitment consultancy Recruitment consultancy Recruitment consultancy Recruitment consultancy Recruitment consultancy Recruitment consultancy Recruitment consultancy Recruitment consultancy Recruitment consultancy Recruitment consultancy Recruitment consultancy South Africa Recruitment consultancy Spain Spain Sweden Switzerland Recruitment consultancy Recruitment consultancy Recruitment consultancy Recruitment consultancy United Arab Emirates Recruitment consultancy Australia Hong Kong Japan Singapore Brazil Canada Mexico Recruitment consultancy Recruitment consultancy Recruitment consultancy Recruitment consultancy Recruitment consultancy Recruitment consultancy Recruitment consultancy Michael Page International Inc* United States Recruitment consultancy *The equity of these subsidiary undertakings is held directly by Michael Page International plc. All companies have been included in the consolidation and operate principally in their country of incorporation. The percentage of the issued share capital held is equivalent to the percentage of voting rights held. The Group holds 100% of all classes of issued share capital. The share capital of all the subsidiary undertakings comprise ordinary shares, with the exception of Michael Page International Recruitment Limited which comprises 1 ordinary share and 421,544,426 preference shares. 6 ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2006 13. Trade and other receivables Trade receivables Less provision for impairment of receivables Net trade receivables Other receivables Prepayments and accrued income Non-current Prepayments and accrued income Group Company 2006 £’000 121,515 (3,270) 118,245 4,497 21,071 2005 £’000 85,059 (2,328) 82,731 3,854 18,350 143,813 104,935 1,927 1,106 2006 £’000 2005 £’000 – – – 307 25 332 – – – – – 15 15 – All non-current receivables are due within five years from the balance sheet date. The fair values of trade and other receivables are not materially different to those disclosed above. Credit risk Management has a credit policy in place and the exposure to credit risk is monitored on an ongoing basis. At the balance sheet date there were no significant concentrations of credit risk. The maximum exposure to credit risk is represented by the carrying amount of each financial asset in the balance sheet. 1. Trade and other payables Current Trade payables Amounts owed to Group companies Other tax and social security Other payables Accruals Deferred income Non-current Deferred income Other tax and social security Group Company 2006 £’000 2005 £’000 2006 £’000 as restated 2005 £’000 5,630 – 28,690 10,070 38,556 579 4,608 – – – 191,574 170,144 26,098 8,837 31,579 502 – – 21 – 1 – 2 – 83,525 71,624 191,595 170,147 495 635 1,130 350 312 662 – – – – – – The fair values of trade and other payables are not materially different to those disclosed above. The total liability relating to other tax and social security includes a balance of £2.5m (2005:£2.9m) relating to social charges on share based payments. 6 MICHAEL PAGE INTERNATIONAL NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS 1. Bank overdrafts and loans Bank overdrafts Bank loans Group Company 2006 £’000 43 39,150 39,193 2005 £’000 281 6,700 6,981 2006 £’000 – 39,150 39,150 2005 £’000 – 6,700 6,700 Total £’000 43 39,150 39,193 281 6,700 6,981 The borrowings stated above are repayable on demand or otherwise within one year. The carrying amounts of the Group’s borrowings are denominated in the following currencies: 31 December 2006 Bank overdrafts Bank loans 31 December 2005 Bank overdrafts Bank loans Sterling £’000 – 39,150 39,150 – 6,700 6,700 Euro £’000 US Dollar £’000 – – – 281 – 281 43 – 43 – – – Bank overdrafts are repayable on demand. At 31 December 2006, the Group had available £10.2m (2005: £44.8m) of undrawn committed borrowing facilities in respect of which all conditions precedent had been met. The average interest rates paid were as follows: Bank overdrafts Bank loans Interest rate risk 31 December 2006 31 December 2005 4.26% 5.40% 5.63% 5.46% The exposure to interest rate and currency risk arises in the normal course of the Group’s business. Borrowings are arranged at floating rates, thus exposing the Group to cash flow interest rate risk. The Group does not consider this risk as significant. The benchmark rates for determining floating rate liabilities are based on relevant national LIBOR equivalents. Currency rate risk An explanation of the Group’s treasury policy is included in the Finance Directors review on page 25. 66 ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2006 16. Provisions for liabilities At 1 January Utilised in year At 31 December Analysis of total provisions: Non-current liabilities Current liabilities Group Company 2006 £’000 576 (384) 192 2006 £’000 – 192 192 2005 £’000 1,188 (612) 576 2005 £’000 192 384 576 2006 £’000 2005 £’000 – – – – – – 2006 £’000 2005 £’000 – – – – – – The provision at 31 December 2006 relates to rentals and other unavoidable costs on onerous lease agreements on properties in the UK. The Group expects to utilise the provision over the next year. 1. Deferred tax The following are the major deferred tax liabilities and assets recognised by the Group, and the movements thereon, during the current and prior reporting periods. At 1 January 2005 Credit to equity for the year Credit to profit or loss for the year Exchange differences At 1 January 2006 Recognised in equity for the year Recognised in profit or loss for the year Changes in rate Exchange differences At 31 December 2006 Accelerated tax depreciation £’000 Share-based payments £’000 Tax losses £’000 283 – (7) (1) (1,480) (4,228) (552) – – – (2,621) – 275 (6,260) (2,621) – 13 – – 1,318 (742) – (2) – (788) 31 264 Other £’000 (537) – (50) 85 (502) – (439) – 6 Total £’000 (1,734) (4,228) (3,230) 84 (9,108) 1,318 (1,956) 31 268 288 (5,686) (3,114) (935) (9,447) Certain deferred tax assets and liabilities have been offset in accordance with the Group’s accounting policy. The following is the analysis of the deferred tax balances (after offset) for balance sheet purposes: Deferred tax assets Deferred tax liabilities 2006 £’000 2005 £’000 (9,447) (9,255) – 147 (9,447) (9,108) 6 MICHAEL PAGE INTERNATIONAL NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS 1. Deferred tax (continued) At 31 December 2006, unremitted earnings of overseas Group companies amounted to £40.2m (2005: £17.6m). Unremitted earnings may be liable to some overseas and UK tax (after allowing for double taxation relief) if they were to be distributed as dividends. However, no tax is expected to be payable on them. Certain of the Group’s overseas operations have current and prior year tax losses, the future utilisation of which is uncertain. Accordingly the Group has not recognised a deferred tax asset of £0.8m (2005: £0.5m) in respect of tax losses of overseas companies. These tax losses are available to offset future taxable profits in the respective jurisdictions. All of the deferred tax asset for losses of £3,114,000 is dependent on arising future taxable profits. Of the recognised deferred tax asset, £3,068,000 is recognised within territories that were loss making in the current year. These losses have been recognised given managements’ expectations for the businesses to which they relate for 2007 and the occurrence of one-off costs within 2006 that are not expected to re-occur. 1. Called-up share capital Authorised Ordinary shares of 1p each Allotted, called-up and fully paid At 1 January Shares issued Cancellation of own shares At 31 December 2006 2005 £’000 Number of shares £’000 Number of shares 5,713 571,250,000 5,713 571,250,000 3,326 332,637,799 3,572 357,202,799 238 23,874,277 – – (232) (23,270,000) (246) (24,565,000) 3,332 333,242,076 3,326 332,637,799 Executive Share Option Scheme (ESOS) The Group has an Executive Share Option Scheme (ESOS) that entitles key management personnel and senior employees to receive shares in the entity. In accordance with these programmes, options are exercisable at the market price of the shares at the date of the grant. Two grants under the ESOS were made before 7 November 2002. The recognition and measurement principles in IFRS 2 have been applied to all grants after 7 November 2002. They have not been applied to the two grants made prior to 7 November 2002 in accordance with the transitional provisions in IFRS 1 “First-time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards” and IFRS 2 “Share-based Payment”. At 31 December 2006 the following options had been granted and remained outstanding in respect of the Company’s ordinary shares of 1p under the Michael Page Executive Share Option Scheme. All options granted are settled by the physical delivery of shares. The Group has no legal or constructive obligation to repurchase or settle the options in cash. 6 ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2006 1. Called-up share capital (continued) Executive Share Option Scheme (ESOS) Year of grant 2001 (Note 1) 2002 (Note 2)* 2002 (Note 2)* 2003 (Note 2)* 2004 (Note 2) 2005 (Note 2) 2006 (Note 2) Balance at 1 January 2006 Granted in year Exercised in year No. of shares oustanding at 31 December 2006 Lapsed in year Base EPS Exercise price per share Exercise period 21,166,055 – (14,045,021) (1,568,134) 5,552,900 9.9 175p March 2004 - March 2011 2,323,750 3,343,750 6,120,000 2,463,000 2,650,000 – – – – – (2,126,250) (2,933,750) – – 410,000 (4,242,700) (60,000) 1,817,300 (50,000) (239,225) 2,173,775 197,500 10.6 186p March 2005 - March 2012 5.8 5.8 4.1 186p March 2006 - March 2012 81.5p-86.1p April 2006 - April 2013 171p-190.3p March 2007 - March 2014 (50,000) (294,200) 2,305,800 7.5 190.75p-191.5p March 2008 - March 2015 – 2,123,500 – (100,316) 2,023,184 15.5 309.9p March 2009 - March 2016 Total 2006 38,066,555 2,123,500 (23,447,721) (2,261,875) 14,480,459 Weighted average exercise price 2006 (£) 1.63 3.10 1.60 1.80 1.84 Total 2005 39,782,159 2,770,000 (426,556) (4,059,048) 38,066,555 Weighted average exercise price 2005 (£) *These options have fully vested 1.61 1.91 1.32 1.69 1.63 3,496,366 options were exercisable at the end of 2006 at a weighted average exercise price of £1.51 (2005: £1.75). In 2006, options were granted on 7 March with the estimated fair values of the options granted on that day of £3.10. In 2005, options were granted on 28 February. The estimated fair values of the options granted on that date was £1.91. Share options are granted under service and non-market performance conditions. These conditions are not taken into account in the fair value measurement at grant date. There are no market conditions associated with the share option grants other than those on the initial grant in 2001. The options outstanding at 31 December 2006 have an exercise price in the range of 81.5 pence to 309.9 pence and a weighted average contractual life of 6.3 years. The fair values of options granted during the year were calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The inputs into the model were as follows: Share price (£) Average exercise price (£) Weighted average fair value (£) Expected volatility Expected life Risk free rate Expected dividend yield Share Option Scheme Incentive Share Scheme Deferred Bonus Shares 2006 3.10 3.10 3.10 35% 5 years 4.75% 1.5% 2005 1.91 1.91 1.91 35% 5 years 4.75% 2% 2006 3.10 Nil 3.10 35% 3 years 4.75% Nil 2005 1.93 Nil 1.93 35% 3 years 4.75% Nil 2006 3.10 Nil 3.10 35% 3 years 4.75% Nil 2005 1.93 Nil 1.93 35% 3 years 4.75% Nil Expected volatility was determined by reference to historical volatility of the Company’s share price since flotation. The expected life used in the model has been adjusted, based on management’s best estimate, for the effects of non-transferability, exercise restrictions and behavioural considerations. Expectations of early exercise are incorporated into the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Group recognised total expenses of £4.5m (2005: £2.7m) related to equity-settled share-based payment transactions during the year. 6 MICHAEL PAGE INTERNATIONAL NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS 1. Called-up share capital (continued) Option plan details Note 1 Pre flotation options On flotation, options over 33,750,000 (9%) ordinary shares were granted to the Executive Directors and 427 employees. These options are subject to the following: (a) 55.6% of an individual’s option entitlement will normally only be exercisable to the extent that Earnings Per Share (EPS) targets have been satisfied over a period of 3 to 10 years. None of these options will vest unless EPS has grown in line with the UK Retail Prices Index (RPI) plus an average of 5% per annum. At that point one third of this portion of the options vest. If EPS growth is higher than this level, vesting increases on a sliding scale basis until 100% of this portion of the options vest where EPS growth matches RPI plus an average of 10% per annum. The base earnings per share is 9.9p. The results for the year ended 31 December 2005 met the EPS performance conditions for 85% of the outstanding options. The result for the year ended 31 December 2006 met the EPS performance conditions for the remaining 15% of the outstanding options, these will vest on 1 March 2007. (b) 44.4% of an individual’s option entitlement will normally only be exercisable to the extent that share price growth targets have been satisfied over a period of at least 3 years. None of these options will vest unless the Company’s share price has achieved 50% growth after 3 years and not later than 5 years. At that point one third of this portion of the options vest. Vesting then increases progressively for further share price growth until full vesting occurs where there is 200% growth after 3 years and not later than 5 years. These hurdles rise from the fifth anniversary of the date of grant at compound rates of growth of 8.45% and 24.57% respectively. At 31 December 2006, the performance conditions were met for 62.4% (2005: 33.7%) of the outstanding share price dependent options. Note 2 Grants post flotation The respective base earnings per share for each grant are shown in the table on page 69. For the 2004, 2005 and 2006 grants, the performance condition is tested on the third anniversary and no retesting will occur thereafter. These options were granted subject to a performance condition requiring that an option may only be exercised, in normal circumstances, if there has been an increase in base earnings per share of at least 3% per annum above the growth in the UK Retail Price Index. All future grants of options under this scheme will be subject to similar EPS performance conditions which is considered the best measure of the Group’s performance and is designed to provide a direct link between the rewards for executives and the returns to shareholders, whilst at the same time ensuring that senior executives can measure the results of their efforts through the Company’s share price. Other share-based payment plans The Company also operates an Incentive Share Plan for the Executive Directors and senior employees and an Annual Bonus Plan for the Executive Directors. Details of these schemes are disclosed on pages 39 and 40, and are settled by the physical delivery of shares, currently satisfied by shares held in the Employee Benefit Trust, to the extent that service and performance conditions are met. 0 ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2006 1. Reserves Share premium The share premium account has been established to represent the excess of the exercise share price over the nominal value of the shares on the exercise of share options. Capital redemption reserve The capital redemption reserve relates to the cancellation of the Company’s own shares. The increase in the year represents the nominal value of the 23,270,000 shares cancelled during the year as shown in Note 18. Reserve for own shares At 31 December 2006, the EBT reserve consisted of 5,552,237 (2005: 5,640,715) ordinary shares held by the Employee Benefit Trust representing 1.67% of the called-up share capital with a market value of £14.7m (2005: £15.2m). A total of 1,805,754 shares have been allocated to satisfy awards made under the Incentive Share Plan, and 575,820 deferred shares have been allocated under the Annual Bonus Plan. Dividends are paid on these shares and they are included in the EPS calculation. Dividend income on the remaining 3,259,141 ordinary shares has been waived, and they are excluded from the EPS calculation. Currency translation reserve The translation reserve comprises all foreign exchange differences arising from the translation of the financial statements of foreign operations that are integral to the operations of the Company. 20. Cash flows from operating activities Profit before tax Depreciation and amortisation charges Profit on sale of property, plant and equipment, and computer software Profit on the sale of business (Note 22) Share scheme charges Net finance cost Operating cashflow before changes in working capital and provisions Increase in receivables Increase in payables Decrease in provisions Cash generated from operations Group Company 2006 £’000 96,959 6,445 (48) – 4,168 408 107,932 (42,376) 13,655 (384) 78,827 2005 £’000 66,136 6,162 (183) (622) 2,694 383 74,570 (17,907) 9,381 (612) 2006 £’000 6,665 568 – – – 891 8,124 (318) 2005 £’000 11,142 – – – – 511 11,653 – 21,428 29,101 – – 65,432 29,234 40,754 1 MICHAEL PAGE INTERNATIONAL NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS 21. Cash and cash equivalents Cash at bank and in hand Short-term deposits Cash and cash equivalents Bank overdrafts Cash and cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows Bank loans Net (debt)/funds 22. Disposal of business Group Company 2006 £’000 23,355 12,232 35,587 (43) 35,544 (39,150) (3,606) 2005 £’000 11,095 8,965 20,060 (281) 19,779 (6,700) 13,079 2006 £’000 as restated 2005 £’000 – – – – – – – – – – (39,150) (39,150) (6,700) (6,700) In the prior year, the Group sold a French business dealing in the placement of subcontractors for £1.4m resulting in a profit on disposal of £0.6m. No assets, liabilities or cash were disposed of, with the disposal comprising business contracts only and associated costs. The trading and cash effects of this business during the year were not material. 23. Commitments Operating lease commitments At 31 December 2006 the Group was committed to make the following payments in respect of non-cancellable operating leases: Leases which expire: Within one year Within two to five years After five years Land and buildings Other 2006 £’000 2005 £’000 1,034 25,280 53,088 79,402 2,205 17,718 50,517 70,440 2006 £’000 284 4,645 – 4,929 2005 £’000 245 2,820 – 3,065 The Group leases various offices under non-cancellable operating lease agreements. The leases have varying terms, escalation clauses and renewal rights. The Group also leases various plant and machinery under operating lease agreements. The Group is required to give a varying notice for the termination of these agreements. Capital commitments The Group had contractual capital commitments of £0.6m as at 31 December 2006 (2005: £0.4m) relating to property, plant and equipment. The Group had contractual capital commitments of £0.2m as at 31 December 2006 (2005: £nil) relating to computer software. VAT group registration As a result of group registration for VAT purposes, the Company is contingently liable for VAT liabilities arising in other companies within the VAT group which at 31 December 2006 amounted to £6.3m (2005: £6.4m). 2 ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2006 2. Contingent liabilities The Company has provided guarantees to other Group undertakings amounting to £8.9m (2005: £5.0m) in the ordinary course of business. It is not anticipated that any material liabilities will arise from the contingent liabilities. 2. Events after the balance sheet date Between 31 December 2006 and 16 February 2007 161,434 options were exercised, which has led to an increase of share capital of £1,614 and an increase in share premium of £299,883. 26. Related party transactions Identity of related parties The Group has a related party relationship with its Directors and members of the Executive Committee, and subsidiaries (Note 12). Transactions with key management personnel Key management personnel are deemed to be the Directors and members of the Executive Committee. The remuneration of Directors and members of the Executive Committee is determined by the Remuneration Committee having regard to the performance of individuals and market trends. For transactions with Directors see the Remuneration Report on pages 39 to 44. Transactions with the remaining members of the Executive Committee are disclosed below. In addition to their salaries, the Group also provides non-cash benefits to members of the Executive Committee, and contributes to a post-employment defined contribution pension plan on their behalf, details of which are given in Note 1. The compensations of the members of the Executive Committee who are not Directors are detailed below: Short-term employee benefits Pension costs - defined contribution plans Termination benefits 2006 £’000 468 33 63 2005 £’000 85 2 – Relocation costs of £98,000 were incurred in the year for key management personnel. Their compensation is included in employment costs (Note 4). In addition, 50,000 options were granted under the Executive Share Option Scheme to the members of the Executive Committee during the year at an exercise price of 309.9p. The increase in emoluments in the current year represents members being on the Committee for a full year. Transactions between the Company and its subsidiaries, which are related parties of the Company, have been eliminated on consolidation and are not disclosed in this note. Details of transactions between the parent company and subsidiary undertakings are shown below. Dividends received Amounts owed by related parties Amounts owed to related parties 2006 £’000 8,140 2005 £’000 2006 £’000 2005 £’000 2006 £’000 2005 £’000 11,668 38,067 47,576 229,641 218,224 3 MICHAEL PAGE INTERNATIONAL SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION AND ADVISERS Annual General Meeting To be held on 23 May 2007 at 12.00 noon at Victoria House, Southampton Row, London, WC1B 4JB. Every shareholder is entitled to attend and vote at the meeting. Final dividend for the year ended 31 December 2006 To be paid (if approved) on 5 June 2007 to shareholders on the register on 4 May 2007. Company secretary Kelvin Stagg Company number 3310225 Registered office, domicile and legal form The Company is a limited liability company incorporated and domiciled within the United Kingdom. The address of its registered office is: Page House, 1 Dashwood Lang Road Addlestone, Weybridge KT15 2QW Tel: 01932 264144 Fax: 01932 264297 Auditors Deloitte & Touche LLP Chartered Accountants Stonecutter Court 1 Stonecutter Street London, EC4A 4TR Solicitors Herbert Smith Exchange House Primrose Street London EC2A 3TR Joint Corporate Brokers Deutsche Bank Winchester House 1 Great Winchester Street London EC2N 2DB Citigroup 33 Canada Square Canary Wharf London E14 5LB Key dates Ex-Dividend date Record date Annual General Meeting Payment of proposed final ordinary dividend Interim results announcement Registrars Capita Registrars Northern House Woodstone Park Fenay Bridge Huddersfield West Yorkshire HD8 0LA Bankers HSBC Bank plc West End Business Banking Centre 70 Pall Mall London SW1Y 5GZ 2 May 2007 4 May 2007 23 May 2007 5 June 2007 20 August 2007 ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2006 FIVE YEAR SUMMARY INCOME STATEMENT Turnover Gross profit Operating profit Profit before tax Profit attributable to equity holders UK GAAP IFRS 2002 £’000 383,470 192,648 32,136 32,597 21,154 2003 £’000 372,616 178,485 21,783 22,409 13,745 2004 £’000 433,731 210,641 38,858 38,859 34,336 2005 £’000 523,810 267,581 66,519 66,136 49,630 2006 £’000 649,060 348,817 97,367 96,959 65,447 Basic earnings per share (pence) 5.8 3.8 9.8 14.8 19.6 The amounts disclosed for 2003 and earlier periods are stated on the basis of UK GAAP because it is not practicable to restate amounts for periods prior to the date of transition to IFRS. MICHAEL PAGE INTERNATIONAL ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING Notice of Meeting Notice is hereby given that the Annual General Meeting of the Company will be held at Victoria House, Southampton Row, London, WC1B 4JB on 23 May 2007 at 12.00 noon for the following purposes: 1. To receive and approve the reports of the Directors and auditors and accounts for the year ended 31 December 2006. 2. To declare a final dividend on the ordinary share capital of the Company for the year ended 31 December 2006 of 4.2p per share. 3. To re-elect Charles-Henri Dumon as a director of the Company (Note 2) 4. To re-elect Sir Adrian Montague as a director of the Company (Note 2) 5. To re-elect Stephen Box as a director of the Company (Note 2) 6. To propose the following ordinary resolution: That the Directors’ Remuneration Report for the year ended 31 December 2006 be received and approved. 7. To re-appoint Deloitte & Touche LLP as auditors of the Company to hold office until the conclusion of the next Annual General Meeting at a remuneration to be fixed by the Directors. 8. To propose the following ordinary resolution: That the Directors be and are hereby generally and unconditionally authorised for the purposes of Section 80 of the Companies Act 1985 (the “Act”) to exercise all powers of the Company to allot relevant securities (as defined in Section 80 (2) of the Act) up to an aggregate nominal amount of £1,099,699 to such persons upon such conditions as the Directors may determine, such authority to expire at the conclusion of the next Annual General Meeting of the Company save that the Company may before such expiry make an offer or agreement which would or might require relevant securities to be allotted in pursuance of such an offer or agreement as if the authority conferred hereby had not expired (Note 4). 9. To propose the following special resolution: That the Directors be and are hereby empowered pursuant to Section 95 of the Companies Act 1985 (the “Act”) to allot equity securities (as defined in Section 94 of the Act) for cash pursuant to the authority conferred by resolution 8 above as if Section 89 (1) of the Act did not apply to such allotment provided that this power shall be limited to: (a) the allotment of equity securities in connection with a rights issue and so that for this purpose “rights issue” means an offer of equity securities open for acceptance for a period fixed by the Directors to holders of equity securities on the register on a fixed record date in proportion to their respective holdings of such securities or in accordance with the rights attached thereto but subject to such exclusions or other arrangements as the Directors may deem necessary or expedient to deal with fractional entitlements or legal or practical problems under the laws of any overseas territory or requirements of any recognised regulatory authority or stock exchange in any country or any matter whatever, and (b) the allotment (other than within the authority conferred in sub paragraph (a) above) of equity securities for cash up to an aggregate nominal amount of £166,621, and shall expire at the conclusion of the next Annual General Meeting of the Company when the general authority under Resolution 8 shall expire, save that the Company may before such expiry make an offer or agreement which would or might require equity securities to be allotted in pursuance of such an offer or agreement as if the authority conferred hereby had not expired (Note 5). 10. To propose the following special resolution: That pursuant to the Company’s Articles of Association and Section 166 of the Companies Act 1985 (the ”Act”), the Company be and is hereby generally and unconditionally authorised to make market purchases of ordinary shares of 1p each in the capital of the Company provided that: (a) the maximum number of ordinary shares hereby authorised to be purchased is 33,324,208; (b) the minimum price which may be paid for each ordinary share is 1 pence; (c) the maximum price which may be paid for each ordinary share is in respect of an ordinary share contracted to be purchased on any day, an amount equal to 105% of the average of the mid-market quotations for an ordinary share of the company as derived from The London Stock Exchange Daily Official List for the five business days immediately preceding the day on which the ordinary share is contracted to be purchased; 6 ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2006 (d) the authority hereby conferred shall expire at the conclusion of the next Annual General Meeting of the Company after the date of passing this resolution, unless such authority is renewed prior to such time; and (e) the Company may conclude a contract to purchase ordinary shares under the authority hereby conferred prior to the expiry of such authority which will or may be exercised wholly or partly after the expiry of such authority and may make a purchase of ordinary shares in pursuance of any such contract as if the authority hereby conferred had not expired (Note 6). By order of the Board Kelvin Stagg Company Secretary Page House, 1 Dashwood Lang Road Addlestone, Weybridge KT15 2QW Registered in England No. 3310225 28 February 2007 Notes 1. Any member entitled to attend and vote at the meeting may appoint another person, whether a member or not, as his proxy to attend and on a poll, to vote instead of him. A form of proxy is enclosed for this purpose and must be deposited with the Company’s registrars together with any power of attorney or other authority under which it is signed, not less than 48 hours before the time appointed for the meeting. Completion and return of the form of proxy will not preclude a member from attending and voting at the meeting. 2. Sir Adrian Montague, Stephen Box and Charles-Henri Dumon will retire by rotation and are seeking reappointment at the Annual General Meeting. Biographical information on each of the Directors is contained on pages 28 of the annual report and accounts. 3. The register of Directors’ interests required to be kept under section 325 of the Act together with copies of the Directors’ service contracts will be available for inspection by members at the registered office of the Company on any weekday during normal business hours from the date of this announcement until the day of the Annual General Meeting and at the place of the meeting not less than 15 minutes before the meeting commences and after the meeting concludes. 4. This authority is in respect of 33% of the issued share capital of the Company and is in accordance with the recommendations of the Association of British Insurers (“ABI”). It is the Directors’ intention to seek renewal of this authority annually. The Directors have no present intention of exercising this authority. There are currently no shares held as Treasury Shares. 5. This authority is in respect of 5% of the issued share capital of the Company and is in accordance with the recommendations of the ABI. It applies to both the issue of new shares and sales of shares out of treasury. It is the Directors’ intention to seek renewal of this authority annually. The Directors have no present intention of exercising this authority. 6. This authority is in respect of 10% of the issued share capital of the Company and the power given by this resolution will only be exercised if the Directors are satisfied that any purchase will increase the Earnings per Share of the Ordinary Share Capital in issue after the purchase and accordingly, that the purchase is in the interests of shareholders. Shares purchased under this authority will be cancelled. 7. To have the right to attend and vote at the meeting (and also for the purpose of calculating how many votes a person may cast), a person must have his/her name entered on the register of members by no later than 48 hours before the time of the meeting. Changes to entries on the register after this time shall be disregarded in determining the rights of any person to attend or vote (and the number of votes they may cast) at the meeting or adjourned meeting. MICHAEL PAGE INTERNATIONAL GERMANY Dusseldorf Frankfurt Munich Berlin THE NETHERLANDS Amsterdam Eindhoven Rotterdam Amersfoort Utrecht UNITED KINGDOM Basingstoke Birmingham Brighton Bristol Bromley Cambridge Cardiff Chelmsford Coventry Crawley Croydon Ealing Edinburgh Glasgow Guildford Harrow Kingston Leeds Liverpool London Maidstone Manchester Middlesex Milton Keynes Nottingham Oxford Peterborough Reading Sheffield Slough Southampton St Albans Stockport Swindon Warrington Watford Weybridge IRELAND Dublin BELGIUM Brussells Antwerp SWITZERLAND Geneva Zurich FRANCE Paris Aix en Provence Lille Lyon Nantes Neuilly sur Seine Strasbourg Cesson Sevigne Toulouse Courbevoie Clichy Issy les Moulineaux Orleans Rennes Rouen Versailles Marseille Noisiel SPAIN Madrid Barcelona PORTUGAL Lisbon ITALY Milan Rome Turin Bologna SWEDEN Stockholm POLAND Warsaw RUSSIA Moscow JAPAN Tokyo CHINA Shanghai Hong Kong Sha Tin MEXICO Mexico City CANADA Toronto USA New York (NY) Iselin (NJ) Stamford (CT) Boston (MA) Chicago (IL) Philadelphia (PA) UAE Dubai BRAZIL Sao Paulo Rio de Janeiro Campinas SOUTH AFRICA Johannesburg SINGAPORE Singapore AUSTRALIA Sydney (NSW) Parramatta (NSW) Chatswood (NSW) Melbourne (Vic) Wheeler’s Hill (Vic) Perth (WA) Brisbane (QLD) GERMANY Dusseldorf Frankfurt Munich Berlin THE NETHERLANDS Amsterdam Eindhoven Rotterdam Amersfoort Utrecht UNITED KINGDOM Basingstoke Birmingham Brighton Bristol Bromley Cambridge Cardiff Chelmsford Coventry Crawley Croydon Ealing Edinburgh Glasgow Guildford Harrow Kingston Leeds Liverpool London Maidstone Manchester Middlesex Milton Keynes Nottingham Oxford Peterborough Reading Sheffield Slough Southampton St Albans Stockport Swindon Warrington Watford Weybridge BELGIUM Brussells Antwerp FRANCE Paris Aix en Provence Lille Lyon Nantes Neuilly sur Seine Strasbourg Cesson Sevigne Toulouse Courbevoie Clichy Issy les Moulineaux Orleans Rennes Rouen Versailles Marseille Noisiel IRELAND Dublin SWITZERLAND Geneva Zurich ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2006 Growing entirely organically, rather than by mergers or acquisitions, we now have nearly 4,000 people in 133 offices in 23 countries worldwide. SWEDEN Stockholm POLAND Warsaw RUSSIA Moscow SPAIN Madrid Barcelona PORTUGAL Lisbon ITALY Milan Rome Turin Bologna JAPAN Tokyo CHINA Shanghai Hong Kong Sha Tin MEXICO Mexico City UAE Dubai BRAZIL Sao Paulo Rio de Janeiro Campinas SOUTH AFRICA Johannesburg SINGAPORE Singapore AUSTRALIA Sydney (NSW) Parramatta (NSW) Chatswood (NSW) Melbourne (Vic) Wheeler’s Hill (Vic) Perth (WA) Brisbane (QLD) CANADA Toronto USA New York (NY) Iselin (NJ) Stamford (CT) Boston (MA) Chicago (IL) Philadelphia (PA) www.michaelpage.co.uk
Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above