More annual reports from Papa John’s International:
2023 ReportPeers and competitors of Papa John’s International:
Young & Co.'s Brewery plcQUALITY. QUALITY. GUARANTEED. ANNUAL REPORT 2015 “IF YOU’RE GOING TO SAY BETTER, YOU BETTER DELIVER.” LOVE YOUR PIZZA OR GET ANOTHER ONE FREE! “IF YOU’RE GOING TO SAY BETTER, YOU BETTER DELIVER.” WE DON’T JUST SAY “BETTER INGREDIENTS. BETTER PIZZA.” WE GUARANTEE IT. Papa John’s is committed to using only the freshest-quality ingredients, and we don’t use artificial flavors or synthetic colors in our pizza. That’s why we introduced Papa’s Quality Guarantee – if you don’t love your pizza we’ll give you another one free. TO OUR SHAREHOLDERS, FRANCHISEES, SUPPLY PARTNERS, AND TEAM MEMBERS: Teamwork can do incredible things. Today, more than three decades after making my fi rst pizza in a broom closet at my dad’s tavern, Papa John’s International, Inc. is one of the largest pizza companies in the world – and the undisputed leader when it comes to pizza quality. We ended 2015 on a high note. As of December, we had nearly 4,900 stores in all 50 states and 39 international countries and territories. We had 100,000 team members at franchised stores and over 20,000 team members at Papa John’s corporate stores. We generated approximately $3.5 billion in global system-wide sales. These numbers wouldn’t be possible if we weren’t devoted to making traditional, superior-quality Papa John’s pizzas. On that note, the 2015 American Customer Satisfaction Index gave Papa John’s the top spot – a refl ection of our unerring dedication to quality. Papa John’s continued growth is a testament to the power of free enterprise. Papa John’s started out as an idea. Through hard work and determination, we turned that idea into something that created opportunities for team members, suppliers, franchisees, and countless millions throughout the world. All of this happened for one simple reason: Papa John’s has always tried to make the world a better place. For over 30 years, we have done that by delivering products and services that improve people’s lives. The results have been incredible. With 2016 now underway, it’s important that we reaffi rm our strategy of operating the same store in nearly 4,900 locations. Last year, this approach allowed Papa John’s to continue creating signifi cant value, delivering adjusted earnings per share of $2.09*, representing a 19% increase over 2014; over the past fi ve years, we have increased earnings per share at an average growth rate of 18% annually. Most importantly, it allowed us to run Papa John’s as if it were an independent, mom-and-pop pizzeria, making traditional, superior-quality Papa John’s pizzas. North America and International Growth North American comparable sales grew by 4.2%, marking the 12th consecutive year of increased or fl at sales growth in our largest business segment. Our international story remains strong – with international comparable sales growth of 6.9% and 182 net restaurant openings. Our UK market led the way, with double-digit comparable sales and strong net unit opens of 37. In addition, we continued to see strong performance in Russia, the Middle East, and Latin America. At year end, we had 1,505 restaurants open beyond North America’s shores. Most importantly, we’ve continued to implement our gold standard ingredients worldwide to make sure all our pizzas taste the same. This costs a little more, but it’s worth it in the long run to help us live up to our motto of “Better Ingredients. Better Pizza.” Our Mission: The Best Pizza Ingredients Around. Period. You can’t make good wine from bad grapes. The foundation of our business is quality and consistency – we’ve always had better ingredients, and we always will. I learned that quality before I ever made the fi rst Papa John’s pizza in the broom closet, back when I was making pizzas at Rocky’s Sub Pub when I was 15. That’s why we have always strived to invest – and always will invest – in the best ingredients for our pizza. Where to start? How about with our fresh, never-frozen, hand-tossed original dough made with extra virgin olive oil. Our fresh-packed tomato sauce is also key – it’s made from ripe, farm-grown California tomatoes, extra virgin olive oil, salt, sunfl ower oil, sugar, and spices. We’re the rare major pizza company that refuses to make our pizza sauce from tomato paste. Why? Because Papa John’s doesn’t compromise on quality. Fast forward to today, and that lesson still stands. I recently came across QSR magazine’s January issue, which included the Top Fast Food Trends in 2016. The number one trend for this year is a movement to “Real Food.” The good news is we’ve been devoted to Real Food since 1984. Papa John’s was built on quality, which is why we talk so openly about our ingredients. It’s also why we always say, “Better Ingredients. Better Pizza.” This isn’t just our slogan – it’s a way of life. In pursuit of this goal, we’ve committed over $100 million a year to have the cleanest and freshest ingredients we can source for our pizzas. This eff ort is already bearing fruit. We have one of the cleanest pizza ingredient labels among top national pizza brands, which means we use relatively 959 1,142 1,323 1,505 Ending Store Count International 1,700 few artifi cial ingredients. We’re also working overtime to eliminate 1,500 the few remaining ones that we do use. Last summer, Panera Bread** 1,300 announced its “No No List” of artifi cial colors, fl avors, sweeteners, and preservatives it intends to remove from its menu by the end of 2016. 1,100 Papa John’s is ahead of the game; 57 of those ingredients are already 900 not found in Papa John’s traditional, superior-quality pizza. 700 We’re not slowing down, either. Papa John’s recently announced that its grilled chicken pizza toppings and chicken poppers will consist 500 of poultry that is raised without human and animal antibiotics, and 300 that they are fed a 100% vegetarian diet. We intend to achieve this 2015 goal by summer 2016. In addition, we also became the fi rst among the top national pizza brands to announce our entire menu is now free of artifi cial fl avors and synthetic colors. This includes all pizza ingredients, pizza toppings, dessert items, and sauce selections. You won’t fi nd fi llers in our meat toppings, or MSG, BHA, BHT, or partially hydrogenated oils. 2009 2010 2012 2013 2014 2011 709 822 635 Our continued focus on quality not only delivers on our promise of “Better Ingredients. Better Pizza.” but also ensures that we maintain the taste that our customers desire. But we need to keep striving to deliver the best. As consumers continue to expect greater transparency from the food industry, we’re looking closely at our labels to ensure that we’re staying true to our promise to constantly improve. We believe we can continue to improve what’s in our pizzas – without sacrifi cing the great taste that characterizes our traditional, superior-quality Papa John’s pizza. That’s why we’re committed to removing 14 more unwanted ingredients from our menu in 2016. Quality Guarantee Just prior to Super Bowl 50, we announced a brand-new initiative for our customers: A Quality Guarantee. This means we guarantee that you’ll love your Papa John’s pizza, but if you don’t, you can tell us why and get another one absolutely free. It’s that simple. We’ve always been proud of the quality of what we serve – with the Quality Guarantee, we’re putting our money where our mouth is. We believe quality shouldn’t be a limited-time off er – it’s our legacy. LOVE YOUR PIZZA OR GET ANOTHER ONE FREE! Speaking of quality, it’s worth mentioning again that Papa John’s earned the top spot in the 2015 American Customer Satisfaction Index. Specifi cally, we achieved the highest rating in the pizza category for an unprecedented 14th time in the past 16 years – and we also earned the highest rating across all limited-service restaurant companies surveyed. We won’t rest on our laurels, either. We’ll continue to strive for the highest customer satisfaction, as shown by our new Quality Guarantee. Adding Another Quality Ingredient Adding Another Quality Ingredient to our All-Star Lineup In 2015, we continued to “Up our Game” In 2015, we continued to “Up our Game” not only with “Better Ingredients. Better not only with “Better Ingredients. Better Pizza.” but also with the addition of Pizza.” but also with the addition of another elite professional athlete as another elite professional athlete as a brand spokesperson: J.J. Watt. J.J., like Peyton Manning, Paul George J.J., like Peyton Manning, Paul George and our other brand spokespeople, and our other brand spokespeople, shares my passion for constantly improving, whether it’s pizza making improving, whether it’s pizza making or playmaking. As the 2015 NFL Defensive Player of As the 2015 NFL Defensive Player of the Year and MVP runner-up, Ending Store Count International 959 822 709 635 1,700 1,500 1,300 1,100 900 700 500 300 1,505 1,323 1,142 J.J. Watt, Papa John’s newest spokesperson. 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Global System Sales $2.28B $2.39B $2.57B $3.32B $3.49B $2.85B $3.02B 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 $4.00 $3.50 $3.00 $2.50 $2.00 $1.50 $1.00 $0.50 55% 50% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% $2.30 $2.10 $1.90 $1.70 $1.50 $1.30 $1.10 $0.90 $0.70 $0.50 Earnings Per Share $1.29 $1.08 $0.92 $0.69 $2.09 $1.75 $1.55 $4.00 $3.50 $3.00 $2.50 $2.00 $1.50 $1.00 $0.50 Global System Sales $3.32B $3.49B $2.85B $3.02B $2.28B $2.39B $2.57B 2009* 2010* 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 *Earnings per share for 2009, 2010 and 2015 are presented on a non-GAAP basis for comparability purposes. See page 32 of this annual report for the GAAP to non-GAAP reconciliation for 2015. See the Investor Relations section of our website which contains the GAAP to non-GAAP reconciliations for 2009 and 2010. **Panera Bread is a registered trademark of Pumpernickel Associates, LLC. Earnings Per Share $1.29 $1.08 $0.92 $0.69 $2.09 $1.75 $1.55 2009* 2010* 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 $2.30 $2.10 $1.90 $1.70 $1.50 $1.30 $1.10 $0.90 $0.70 $0.50 $2.5 $2.0 $1.5 $1.0 $0.5 Online Sales Mix Domestic Restaurants 48% 46% 52% Market Capitalization $2.2B $2.1B $1.9B $2.5 $2.0 $1.5 $1.0 $0.5 $1.2B $0.9B $0.6B $0.7B 40% 33% 28% 25% 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Online Sales Mix Domestic Restaurants 48% 46% 52% Market Capitalization $2.2B $2.1B $1.9B $1.2B $0.9B $0.6B $0.7B 55% 50% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 40% 33% 28% 25% 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 J.J. is a hard-working, high-character individual who embodies the same values as us. He’s a role model for millions of young people and football fans. As part of our partnership, we will continue to support J.J.’s foundation – the Justin J. Watt Foundation – which supports athletic opportunities for middle school students in the Houston area. This eff ort will further elevate Papa John’s role as Offi cial Pizza Sponsor of the NFL and Super Bowl 50. These eff orts have landed Papa John’s at the top of national TV rankings and made us one of the most recognized brands among avid NFL fans. Combined with our partnerships with Joe Montana, Peyton Manning, and others, our advertising campaigns have driven home our story of “Better Ingredients. Better Pizza.” for tens of millions of people. “Better Ingredients. Better Pizza.” for tens of millions of people. O R T UNITIE S O P P Creating More Meaningful Opportunities for Young People This summer, we joined the 100,000 Opportunities Initiative, the nation’s largest employer-led coalition focused on youth employment. This is a cause we deeply believe in. In 2015, we hired over 14,000 young men and women, and we will continue our commitment to help young people lead others, fi nd fulfi llment and success, and climb the ladder of opportunity. 0 0 0 , 0 0 1 I N I T I A T I V E 1,700 1,500 1,300 1,100 900 700 500 300 Ending Store Count International 959 822 709 635 1,505 1,323 1,142 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Global System Sales $4.00 $3.50 $3.00 $2.50 $2.00 $1.50 $1.00 $0.50 There are tens of thousands of stories I could tell. Over the years, we’ve had countless young people join our team. For some, Papa John’s helped support them through school. For others, it’s been a place where they’ve built careers. Meaningful work benefi ts everyone, and I have watched thousands of Papa John’s team members rise through our ranks to become general managers, franchise owners, and executive leaders. $2.57B In fact, our company president, Steve Ritchie, started with Papa John’s as a customer service representative over 20 years ago. As someone who started out washing dishes at age 15 before graduating to making pizzas, nothing makes me prouder than to help build future generations of American leadership. When our team members succeed, Papa John’s succeeds. And 2015 when Papa John’s succeeds, the world improves. 2009 2010 2013 2012 2014 2011 $3.02B $2.39B $2.85B $2.28B $3.49B $3.32B Two legendary quarterbacks, and one legendary Pizza Maker: Joe Montana, Peyton Manning & Papa John. Slice the Bill with Friends Papa John’s continues to improve the quality of Papa John’s continues to improve the quality of our digital customer experience, most notably our digital customer experience, most notably with a complete revamp of our website. In with a complete revamp of our website. In 2015, digital and mobile channels accounted 2015, digital and mobile channels accounted for 52 percent of our total U.S. sales, for 52 percent of our total U.S. sales, both delivery and carryout. Papa John’s both delivery and carryout. Papa John’s already has a solid track record of digital already has a solid track record of digital “fi rsts.” Fifteen years ago, we were “fi rsts.” Fifteen years ago, we were the fi rst commercial pizza chain to the fi rst commercial pizza chain to allow system-wide online ordering allow system-wide online ordering in our traditional restaurants. We in our traditional restaurants. We were also the fi rst pizza brand to account for 50 percent of all sales through digital and mobile channels. Ending Store Count International 959 822 709 635 1,700 1,500 1,300 1,100 900 700 500 300 1,505 1,323 1,142 Online Sales Mix Domestic Restaurants 52% 48% 46% 40% 33% 28% 25% 55% 50% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% $2.30 $2.10 $1.90 $1.70 $1.50 $1.30 $1.10 $0.90 $0.70 $0.50 $2.5 $2.0 $1.5 $1.0 $0.5 Earnings Per Share $1.29 $1.08 $0.92 $0.69 $2.09 $1.75 $1.55 2009* 2010* 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Market Capitalization $2.2B $2.1B $1.9B $1.2B $0.9B $0.6B $0.7B 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 $4.00 $3.50 $3.00 $2.50 $2.00 $1.50 $1.00 $0.50 55% 50% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% Global System Sales $2.28B $2.39B $2.57B $3.32B $3.49B $2.85B $3.02B 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Earnings Per Share $1.29 $1.08 $0.92 $0.69 $2.09 $1.75 $1.55 2009* 2010* 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 $2.30 $2.10 $1.90 $1.70 $1.50 $1.30 $1.10 $0.90 $0.70 $0.50 $2.5 $2.0 $1.5 $1.0 $0.5 Online Sales Mix Domestic Restaurants 48% 46% 52% Market Capitalization $2.2B $2.1B $1.9B 40% 33% 28% 25% $1.2B $0.9B $0.6B $0.7B 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Quality Above All Papa John’s will continue to double-down on quality in 2016, whether through the Quality Guarantee, continued improvements in our menu and ingredients, and more. In all that we do, we will continue to improve how we deliver “Better Ingredients. Better Pizza.” We will also double- down on building stronger relationships between our team members, our suppliers, our franchisees, our customers, our communities, and the world around us. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again – if we take care of our employees and look out for them, we will continue to make traditional, superior-quality Papa John’s pizzas. Together, we made great strides in 2015. We can do even better in 2016. Ever since I made the fi rst Papa John’s pizza in the broom closet over 30 years ago, I’ve believed that if you work hard, innovate, and put others before yourself, you can truly make the world a better place. That has always been our vision at Papa John’s – and it’s exactly what we can do if we keep our focus on “Better Ingredients. Better Pizza.” John H. Schnatter Founder, Chairman, and Chief Executive Offi cer In 2015, we unveiled several digital innovations to improve our customer experience. We completely redesigned our website and now are one of the only brands in the category with a fully responsive site. In addition, we redesigned our iOS app and have signifi cantly improved our rating among users and against the competition. We have more orders coming from mobile than ever before and we relaunched our Papa Rewards loyalty program with new redemption options, including side items, to add value and variety for all of our customers. We are still the only national pizza chain with an e-commerce help desk and extended this service to social channels as well. We reached yet another milestone in 2015 when we announced the introduction of PayShare, a fi rst-of-its-kind digital solution that lets customers immediately split their pizza bill on any mobile or online order. It’s a simple, digital solution that allows our customers to focus on enjoying their favorite pizza with their friends and family. You can even post your order on social media to let your friends know what you ordered. In today’s “sharing economy,” consumers split fares for car services and share their homes on vacation rental sites – why not share the pizza bill, too? “ BETTER INGREDIENTS. BETTER PIZZA. THIS ISN’T JUST OUR SLOGAN – IT’S A WAY OF LIFE . ”– JOHN “ QUALITY IS OUR FOUNDATION AND OUR DISTINCTION. WE’VE ALWAYS HAD BETTER INGREDIENTS, A N D A L W AY S W I L L . ” Executive Leadership Team 208 Years of Total Service JOHN H. SCHNATTER Founder, Chairman and Chief Executive Offi cer ★ 32 Years STEVE M. RITCHIE President and Chief Operating Offi cer ★ 20 Years LANCE F. TUCKER Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Offi cer, Chief Administrative Offi cer, and Treasurer ★ 18 Years SEAN A. MULDOON Senior Vice President, Chief Ingredient Offi cer ★ 16 Years R. SHANE HUTCHINS Senior Vice President, PJ Food Service ★ 18 Years CYNTHIA A. MCCLELLEN Senior Vice President, Information Systems and Project Management Offi ce ★ 6 Years TIMOTHY C. O’HERN Senior Vice President, Chief Development Offi cer ★ 29 Years CAROLINE MILLER OYLER Senior Vice President, General Counsel ★ 16 Years EDMOND M. HEELAN Senior Vice President, North American Operations and Global OST ★ 15 Years ROBERT W. SMITH, JR. Senior Vice President, Global Human Resources ★ 13 Years JACK H. SWAYSLAND Senior Vice President, International ★ 9 Years ROBERT E. THOMPSON Senior Vice President, Marketing ★ 16 Years ★ = Represents years working with John Schnatter and/or Papa John’s Board of Directors Corporate Information JOHN H. SCHNATTER Founder, Chairman and Chief Executive Offi cer LAURETTE T. KOELLNER (1, 3) Business Consultant OLIVIA F. KIRTLEY (1*, 2) Business Consultant MARK S. SHAPIRO (1, 3*) Chief Content Offi cer, IMG SONYA E. MEDINA (3) Government and Public Aff airs Strategist W. KENT TAYLOR (2) Founder, Chairman and Chief Executive Offi cer of Texas Roadhouse, Inc. CHRISTOPHER L. COLEMAN (1, 3) Managing Director, Rothschild – London Corporate Headquarters 2002 Papa John’s Boulevard Louisville, Kentucky 40299 502-261-7272 Stock Listing Papa John’s stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the ticker symbol PZZA Annual Meeting The annual meeting of stockholders will be held Thursday, April 28, 2016, 11:00 A.M. (E.D.T) at: Papa John’s International, Inc. 2002 Papa John’s Boulevard Louisville, Kentucky 40299 Independent Public Accountants Ernst & Young LLP Transfer Agent Computershare Shareholder Services 211 Quality Circle, Suite 210 College Station, TX 77845 www.computershare.com/investor 800-622-6757 (US, Canada, Puerto Rico) 781-575-4735 (non-US) Investor Relations Lance F. Tucker Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Offi cer, Chief Administrative Offi cer, and Treasurer 502-261-7272 Corporate Communications – Media Relations Peter Collins Senior Director, Public Relations 502-261-7272 Forward-Looking Statements This report includes non-historical or “forward- looking” statements concerning future events or conditions. Important risk factors, which could cause actual results to diff er materially from these statements, are set forth in Item 1A. Risk Factors in the accompanying Form 10-K. For More Information To learn more about Papa John’s, or to order online, visit our website at www.papajohns.com NORBORNE P. COLE, JR. (2*, 4) Business Consultant Numbers Indicate Board Committees: (1) Audit Committee (2) Compensation Committee (3) Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee (4) Lead Independent Director * Committee Chair UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 (Mark One) [X] Annual Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 27, 2015 FORM 10-K or [ ] Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the transition period from _____________________ to _______________________ Commission File Number: 0-21660 PAPA JOHN’S INTERNATIONAL, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) 61-1203323 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 2002 Papa Johns Boulevard Louisville, Kentucky (Address of principal executive offices) 40299-2367 (Zip Code) (502) 261-7272 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: (Title of Each Class) Common Stock, $0.01 par value (Name of each exchange on which registered) The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [X] No [ ] Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes [ ] No [X] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [X] No [ ] Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [X] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Large accelerated filer [X] Non-accelerated filer [ ] Accelerated filer [ ] Smaller reporting company [ ] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes [ ] No [X] The aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant, computed by reference to the closing sale price on The NASDAQ Stock Market as of the last business day of the Registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, June 28, 2015, was $2,235,251,445. As of February 16, 2016, there were 37,733,506 shares of the Registrant’s common stock outstanding. DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE Portions of Part III of this annual report are incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held April 28, 2016. TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I Item 1. Item 1A. Item 1B. Item 2. Item 3. Item 4. Business Risk Factors Unresolved Staff Comments Properties Legal Proceedings Mine Safety Disclosures PART II Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters Item 6. Item 7. and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities Selected Financial Data Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Item 7A. Item 8. Item 9. Item 9A. Item 9B. Financial Condition and Results of Operations Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure Controls and Procedures Other Information PART III Item 10. Item 11. Item 12. Item 13. Item 14. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance Executive Compensation Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence Principal Accounting Fees and Services Page 1 11 19 19 21 22 23 26 27 49 52 85 85 87 87 87 88 88 88 PART IV Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules 89 PART I Item 1. Business General Papa John’s International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (referred to as the “Company”, “Papa John’s” or in the first person notations of “we”, “us” and “our”) operates and franchises pizza delivery and carryout restaurants and, in certain international markets, dine-in and delivery restaurants under the trademark “Papa John’s”. Papa John’s began operations in 1984. At December 27, 2015, there were 4,893 Papa John’s restaurants in operation, consisting of 752 Company-owned and 4,141 franchised restaurants operating domestically in all 50 states and in 39 countries and territories. Our Company-owned restaurants include 213 restaurants operated under four joint venture arrangements and 45 units in Beijing and North China. Papa John’s has defined five reportable segments: domestic Company-owned restaurants, domestic commissaries (Quality Control Centers), North America franchising, international operations, and “all other” business units. North America is defined as the United States and Canada. Domestic is defined as the contiguous United States. International franchisees are defined as all franchise operations outside of the United States and Canada. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Note 20” of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for financial information about our segments. All of our periodic and current reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), are available, free of charge, through our website located at www.papajohns.com, including our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to those reports. Those documents are available through our website as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file them with the SEC. We also make available free of charge on our website our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Board Committee Charters, and our Code of Ethics, which applies to Papa John's directors, officers and employees. Printed copies of such documents are also available free of charge upon written request to Investor Relations, Papa John’s International, Inc., P.O. Box 99900, Louisville, KY 40269-0900. You may read and copy any materials filed with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. This information is also available at www.sec.gov. The references to these website addresses do not constitute incorporation by reference of the information contained on the websites, which should not be considered part of this document. Strategy Our goal is to build the strongest brand loyalty in the pizza industry. Recognized as a trusted brand and quality leader in the domestic pizza category, we endeavor to build our brand on a global basis. The key elements of our strategy include: High-Quality Menu Offerings. Our menu strategy focuses on the quality of our ingredients. Domestic Papa John’s restaurants offer high-quality pizza along with side items, including breadsticks, cheesesticks, chicken poppers and wings, dessert items and canned or bottled beverages. Papa John’s traditional crust pizza is prepared using fresh dough (never frozen). Papa John’s pizzas are made from a proprietary blend of wheat flour, 100% real cheese made from mozzarella, fresh-packed pizza sauce made from vine-ripened tomatoes (not from concentrate) and a proprietary mix of savory spices, and a choice of high-quality meat and vegetable toppings. Our traditional crust pizza is delivered with a container of our 1 special garlic sauce and a pepperoncini pepper. In addition to our fresh dough traditional crust pizza, we offer a thin crust pizza, which is a par-baked product produced by a third-party vendor. Each thin crust pizza is served with a packet of special seasonings and a pepperoncini pepper. Domestically, all ingredients and toppings can be purchased by our Company-owned and franchised restaurants from our Quality Control Center (“QC Center”) system, which delivers to individual restaurants twice weekly. To ensure consistent food quality, each domestic franchisee is required to purchase dough and tomato sauce from our QC Centers and to purchase all other supplies from our QC Centers or other approved suppliers. Internationally, the menu may be more diverse than in our domestic operations to meet local tastes and customs. Most QC Centers outside the U.S. are operated by franchisees pursuant to license agreements or by other third parties. The Company operates three international QC Centers in Mexico, the United Kingdom and China. We provide significant assistance to licensed international QC Centers in sourcing approved quality suppliers. All of the QC Centers are required to meet food safety and quality standards and to be in compliance with all applicable laws. We continue to test new product offerings both domestically and internationally, including limited time offering pizzas. The new products can become a part of the permanent menu if they meet certain established guidelines. Efficient Operating System. We believe our operating and distribution systems, restaurant layout and designated delivery areas result in lower restaurant operating costs and improved food quality, and promote superior customer service. Our QC Center system takes advantage of volume purchasing of food and supplies and provides consistency and efficiencies of scale in fresh dough production. This eliminates the need for each restaurant to order food from multiple vendors and commit substantial labor and other resources to dough preparation. Commitment to Team Member Training and Development. We are committed to the development and motivation of our team members through training programs, incentive and recognition programs and opportunities for advancement. Team member training programs are conducted for corporate restaurant team members, and operational training is offered to our franchisees. We offer performance-based financial incentives to corporate team members and restaurant managers. Marketing. Our domestic marketing strategy consists of both national and local components. Our national strategy includes national advertising via television, print, direct mail, digital, mobile marketing and social media channels. Our online and digital marketing activities have increased significantly over the past several years in response to increasing consumer use of online and mobile web technology. Local advertising programs include television, radio, and print materials. We strive to efficiently allocate resources among television, print, digital, and other media. We also integrate social media into our various marketing campaigns. In international markets, our marketing focuses on reaching customers who live or work within a small radius of a Papa John’s restaurant. Our international markets use a combination of advertising strategies, including television, radio, digital, and print depending on the size of the local market. Technology. We use technology to both enhance the customer experience and improve efficiencies in our Company-owned and franchised restaurants. Our proprietary digital ordering platform allows customers to order online. Our mobile ordering iPhone® and Android® applications support payment options such as Google Wallet® and PayShare, a first-of-its-kind digital solution in the pizza industry that lets customers immediately split their pizza bill. Our Papa Rewards® program is an eCommerce customer loyalty program designed to increase customer loyalty and frequency. In 2015, we upgraded our domestic proprietary point-of-sale technology, which we refer to as “FOCUS”. We believe this technology facilitates fast and accurate order-taking and pricing and is an easy tool for restaurant operators to learn 2 and use. The FOCUS system is also integrated with our digital ordering solutions in all domestic traditional Papa John’s restaurants, enabling Papa John’s to offer nationwide digital ordering to our customers. Strong Franchise System. We are committed to developing and maintaining a strong franchise system by attracting experienced operators, supporting them to expand and grow their business and monitoring their compliance with our high standards. We seek to attract franchisees with experience in restaurant or retail operations and with the financial resources and management capability to open single or multiple locations. We devote significant resources to provide Papa John’s franchisees with assistance in restaurant operations, operations training, marketing, site selection and restaurant design. Our strategy for global unit growth focuses on our strong unit economics model. We strive to eliminate barriers to expansion in existing international markets, and identify new expansion opportunities. Our growth strategy varies based on the maturity and penetration of the market and other factors in specific domestic and international markets, with overall unit growth expected to come increasingly from international markets. Restaurant Sales and Investment Costs We are committed to maintaining strong restaurant unit economics. In 2015, the 667 domestic Company- owned restaurants included in the full year’s comparable restaurant base generated average annual unit sales of $1.12 million. Our North American franchise restaurants, which included 2,351 restaurants in 2015, generated average annual unit sales of $858,000. North American franchise restaurant sales are lower than Company-owned restaurants as a higher percentage of our Company-owned restaurants are located in more heavily penetrated markets. With few exceptions, domestic restaurants do not offer a dine-in area, which reduces our restaurant capital investment. The average cash investment for the 11 domestic traditional Company-owned restaurants opened during 2015, exclusive of land, was approximately $319,000 per unit, compared to the $283,000 investment for the 11 domestic traditional units opened in 2014, excluding tenant allowances that we received. Over the past few years we have experienced an increase in the cost of our new restaurants primarily as a result of building larger units to accommodate increased sales, an increase in the cost of certain equipment as a result of technology enhancements, and increased costs to comply with local regulations. We define a “traditional” domestic Papa John’s restaurant as a delivery and carryout unit that services a defined trade area. We consider the location of a traditional restaurant to be important and therefore devote significant resources to the investigation and evaluation of potential sites. The site selection process includes a review of trade area demographics, target population density and competitive factors. A member of our development team inspects each potential domestic Company-owned restaurant location and substantially all franchised restaurant locations before a site is approved. Papa John’s restaurants are typically located in strip shopping centers or freestanding buildings that provide visibility, curb appeal and accessibility. Our restaurant design can be configured to fit a wide variety of building shapes and sizes, which increases the number of suitable locations for our Company-owned and franchised restaurants. A typical traditional domestic Papa John’s restaurant averages 1,100 to 1,500 square feet with visible exterior signage. “Non-traditional” Papa John’s restaurants generally do not provide delivery service but rather provide walk-up or carry out service to a captive customer group within a designated facility, such as a food court at an airport, university or military base or an event-driven service at facilities such as sports stadiums or entertainment venues. Non-traditional units are designed to fit the unique requirements of the venue and may not offer the full range of menu items available in our traditional restaurants. 3 All of our international restaurants are franchised, except for 45 Company-owned restaurants in Beijing and North China. Generally, our international Papa John’s restaurants are slightly smaller than our domestic restaurants and average between 900 and 1,400 square feet; however, in order to meet certain local customer preferences, some international restaurants have been opened in larger spaces to accommodate both dine-in and restaurant-based delivery service, typically with 35 to 140 seats. Development A total of 357 Papa John’s restaurants were opened during 2015, consisting of 16 Company-owned and 341 franchised restaurants (106 in North America and 235 international), while 127 Papa John’s restaurants closed during 2015, consisting of six Company-owned (two in North America and four in Beijing) and 121 franchised restaurants (72 in North America and 49 international), representing net global unit growth of 230 restaurants. Although most of our domestic Company-owned markets are well-penetrated, our Company-owned growth strategy is to continue to open domestic restaurants in existing markets as appropriate, thereby increasing consumer awareness and enabling us to take advantage of operational and marketing efficiencies. Our experience in developing markets indicates that market penetration through the opening of multiple restaurants in a particular market results in increased average restaurant sales in that market over time. We have co-developed domestic markets with some franchisees or divided markets among franchisees and will continue to utilize market co-development in the future, where appropriate. Of the total 3,388 North American restaurants open as of December 27, 2015, 707 or 20.9% were Company-owned (including 213 units owned in joint venture arrangements with franchisees in which the Company has a majority ownership position). Operating Company-owned restaurants allows us to improve operations, training, marketing and quality standards, for the benefit of the entire system. From time to time, we evaluate the purchase or sale of units in significant markets, which could change the percentage of Company-owned units. Of the 1,505 international restaurants open as of December 27, 2015, 45 or 3.0% were Company-owned (all of which are located in Beijing and North China). We plan to sell the 45 Company-owned China restaurants in the next 12 months. Accordingly, as of December 27, 2015, the Company’s China operations, including these restaurants and a commissary, are classified as held for sale in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. During 2016, we expect net unit growth of approximately 180 to 210 units, with approximately 75% of openings in international franchised markets. International franchised unit expansion includes an emphasis on existing markets in Latin and South America, the United Kingdom, Europe and the Middle East. QC Center System and Supply Chain Management Our domestic QC Center system, comprised of ten full-service regional production and distribution centers, supplies pizza dough, food products, paper products, smallwares and cleaning supplies twice weekly to each traditional restaurant throughout the contiguous United States. This system enables us to monitor and control product quality and consistency, while lowering food and other costs. We evaluate the QC Center system capacity in relation to existing restaurants’ volumes and planned restaurant growth, and facilities are developed or upgraded as operational or economic conditions warrant. In 2016, we have plans to construct an additional domestic full-service production and distribution center in the Southeast Region of the United States. 4 We own full-service international QC Centers in the United Kingdom, Mexico City, Mexico and Beijing, China. Other international QC Centers are licensed to franchisees or non-franchisee third parties and are generally located in the markets where our franchisees have restaurants. We set quality standards for all products used in Papa John’s restaurants and designate approved outside suppliers of food and paper products that meet our quality standards. To ensure product quality and consistency, all domestic Papa John’s restaurants are required to purchase tomato sauce and dough from QC Centers. Franchisees may purchase other goods directly from our QC Centers or other approved suppliers. National purchasing agreements with most of our suppliers generally result in volume discounts to us, allowing us to sell products to our restaurants at prices we believe are below those generally available to restaurants in the marketplace. Within our domestic QC Center system, products are distributed to restaurants by leased refrigerated trucks operated by us. Marketing Programs Our local restaurant-level marketing programs target consumers within the delivery area of each restaurant through the use of local television, radio, print materials, targeted direct mail, store-to-door flyers, digital display advertising, email marketing, text messages and local social media. Local marketing efforts also include a variety of community-oriented activities within schools, sports venues and other organizations supported with some of the same advertising vehicles mentioned above. Domestic Company-owned and franchised Papa John’s restaurants within a defined market may be required to join an area advertising cooperative (“Co-op”). Each member restaurant contributes a percentage of sales to the Co-op for market-wide programs, such as television, radio, digital and print advertising, and sports sponsorships. The rate of contribution and uses of the monies collected are determined by a majority vote of the Co-op’s members. The contribution rate for Co-ops generally may not be below 2% of sales without approval from Papa John’s. The restaurant-level and Co-op marketing efforts are supported by media, print, digital and electronic advertising materials that are produced by Papa John’s Marketing Fund, Inc. (“PJMF”). PJMF is an unconsolidated nonstock corporation designed to operate at break-even for the purpose of designing and administering advertising and promotional programs for all participating domestic restaurants. PJMF produces and buys air time for Papa John’s national television commercials, buys digital media such as banner advertising, paid search-engine advertising, mobile marketing, social media advertising and marketing, and SMS text and email. It also engages in other brand-building activities, such as consumer research and public relations activities. Domestic Company-owned and franchised Papa John’s restaurants are required to contribute a certain minimum percentage of sales to PJMF. The contribution rate to PJMF can be set at up to 3% of sales, if approved by the governing board of PJMF, and beyond that level if approved by a supermajority of domestic restaurants. The contribution rate has been 4% since 2011. Our proprietary digital ordering platform allows customers to order online. Our eCommerce platforms include “plan ahead ordering,” Spanish-language ordering capability, Google Wallet® alternative payment and enhanced mobile web ordering for our customers, including Papa John's iPhone® and Android® applications. In April 2015, we introduced PayShare, a first-of-its-kind digital solution in the pizza industry that lets customers immediately split their pizza bill. PayShare, powered by Venmo, provides our customers a safe and secure option to simply and easily split the check on any mobile or online order. Our Papa Rewards® program is an eCommerce customer loyalty program designed to increase loyalty and frequency of consumer use of our eCommerce ordering platform. We receive a percentage-based fee from U.S. franchisees for online sales, in addition to royalties, to defray development and operating costs associated with our eCommerce ordering platform. 5 Our domestic restaurants offer customers the opportunity to purchase a reloadable gift card referred to as the “Papa Card.” The Papa Card is sold as either a plastic gift card purchased in our restaurants, or an online digital card. We sell Papa Cards to consumers on our website and through third-party retailers. We also sell cards in bulk to business entities and organizations. We continue to explore other Papa Card distribution opportunities. The Papa Card may be redeemed for delivery, carryout, and eCommerce orders and is accepted at all Papa John’s traditional domestic restaurants. We provide both Company-owned and franchised restaurants with pre-approved marketing materials and catalogs for the purchase of uniforms and promotional items. We also provide direct marketing services to Company-owned and franchised restaurants using customer information gathered by our proprietary point-of-sale technology (see “Company Operations – Domestic Point-of-Sale Technology”). In addition, we provide database tools, templates and training for operators to facilitate local email marketing and text messaging through our approved tools. In international markets, our marketing focuses on customers who live or work within a small radius of a Papa John’s restaurant. Certain markets can effectively use television and radio as part of their marketing strategies. The majority of the marketing efforts include using print materials such as flyers, newspaper inserts, in-store marketing materials, and to a growing extent, digital marketing such as display, search engine marketing, social media, mobile marketing, email, and SMS text. Local marketing efforts, such as sponsoring or participating in community events, sporting events and school programs, are also used to build customer awareness. Company Operations Domestic Restaurant Personnel. A typical Papa John’s Company-owned domestic restaurant employs a restaurant manager and approximately 20 to 25 hourly team members, many of whom work part-time. The manager is responsible for the day-to-day operation of the restaurant and maintaining Company- established operating standards. We seek to hire experienced restaurant managers and staff and provide comprehensive training programs in areas such as operations and managerial skills. We also employ directors of operations who are responsible for overseeing an average of seven Company-owned restaurants. Senior management and corporate staff also support the field teams in many areas, including, but not limited to, quality assurance, food safety, training, marketing and technology. We seek to motivate and retain personnel by providing opportunities for advancement and performance-based financial incentives. Training and Education. The Global Operations Support and Training department is responsible for creating tools and materials for the operational training and development of both corporate and franchise team members. We believe training is very important to delivering consistent operational execution. Operations personnel complete our management training program and ongoing development programs, including multi-unit training, in which instruction is given on all aspects of our systems and operations. Domestic Point-of-Sale Technology. Our proprietary point-of-sale technology, “FOCUS”, is in place in all North America traditional Papa John’s restaurants. We believe this technology facilitates fast and accurate order-taking and pricing, and allows the restaurant manager to better monitor and control food and labor costs, including food inventory management and order placement from the domestic QC Centers. The system allows us to obtain restaurant operating information, providing us with timely access to sales and customer information. The FOCUS system is also integrated with our digital ordering solutions in all domestic traditional Papa John’s restaurants, enabling Papa John’s to offer nationwide digital ordering to our customers. Domestic Hours of Operation. Our domestic restaurants are open seven days a week, typically from 11:00 a.m. to 12:30 a.m. Monday through Thursday, 11:00 a.m. to 1:30 a.m. on Friday and Saturday and 6 12:00 noon to 11:30 p.m. on Sunday. Carry out hours are generally more limited for late night, for security purposes. Franchise Program General. We continue to attract franchisees with significant restaurant and retail experience. We consider our franchisees to be a vital part of our system’s continued growth and believe our relationship with our franchisees is good. As of December 27, 2015, there were 4,141 franchised Papa John’s restaurants operating in all 50 states and 39 countries and territories. During 2015, our franchisees opened an additional 341 (106 North America and 235 international) restaurants. As of December 27, 2015, we have development agreements with our franchisees for approximately 200 additional North America restaurants, the majority of which are committed to open over the next two to three years, and agreements for approximately 940 additional international franchised restaurants, the majority of which are scheduled to open over the next six years. There can be no assurance that all of these restaurants will be opened or that the development schedule set forth in the development agreements will be achieved. Approval. Franchisees are approved on the basis of the applicant’s business background, restaurant operating experience and financial resources. We seek franchisees to enter into development agreements for single or multiple restaurants. We require each franchisee to complete our training program or to hire a full-time operator who completes the training and has either an equity interest or the right to acquire an equity interest in the franchise operation. For most non-traditional operations and for operations outside the United States, we will allow an approved operator bonus plan to substitute for the equity interest. North America Development and Franchise Agreements. We enter into development agreements with our franchisees in North America for the opening of a specified number of restaurants within a defined period of time and specified geographic area. Our standard domestic development agreement includes a fee of $25,000 before consideration of any incentives. The franchise agreement is generally executed once a franchisee secures a location. Our current standard franchise agreement requires the franchisee to pay a royalty fee of 5% of sales, and the majority of our existing franchised restaurants have a 5% royalty rate in effect. Over the past several years, we have offered various development incentive programs for domestic franchisees to accelerate unit openings. Such incentives included the following for 2015 traditional openings: (1) waiver of the standard one-time $25,000 franchise fee if the unit opens on time in accordance with the agreed-upon development schedule, or a reduced fee of $5,000 if the unit opens late; (2) the waiver of some or all of the 5% royalty fee for a period of time; (3) a credit for a portion of the purchase of certain leased equipment; and (4) a credit to be applied toward a future food purchase, under certain circumstances. We believe the development incentive programs have accelerated unit openings and expect they will continue to do so in 2016. Substantially all existing franchise agreements have an initial 10-year term with a 10-year renewal option. We have the right to terminate a franchise agreement for a variety of reasons, including a franchisee’s failure to make payments when due or failure to adhere to our policies and standards. Many state franchise laws limit our ability as a franchisor to terminate or refuse to renew a franchise. We provide assistance to Papa John’s franchisees in selecting sites, developing restaurants and evaluating the physical specifications for typical restaurants. We provide layout and design services and recommendations for subcontractors, signage installers and telephone systems to Papa John’s franchisees. Our franchisees can purchase complete new store equipment packages through an approved third-party supplier. We sell replacement smallwares and related items to our franchisees. Each franchisee is responsible for selecting the location for its restaurants but must obtain our approval of restaurant design 7 and location based on traffic accessibility and visibility of the site and targeted demographic factors, including population density, income, age and traffic. Domestic Franchise Support Initiatives. From time to time, we offer discretionary support initiatives to our domestic franchisees, including: • Performance-based incentives; • Targeted royalty relief and local marketing support to assist certain identified franchisees or markets; • Restaurant opening incentives; and • Reduced-cost direct mail campaigns from Preferred Marketing Solutions (“Preferred,” our wholly owned print and promotions subsidiary). In 2016, we plan to offer some or all of these domestic franchise support initiatives. International Development and Franchise Agreements. We opened our first franchised restaurant outside the United States in 1998. We define “international” as all markets outside the United States and Canada. In international markets, we have either a development agreement or a master franchise agreement with a franchisee for the opening of a specified number of restaurants within a defined period of time and specified geographic area. Under a master franchise agreement, the franchisee has the right to sub- franchise a portion of the development to one or more sub-franchisees approved by us. Under our current standard international development or master franchise agreement, the franchisee is required to pay total fees of $25,000 per restaurant: $5,000 at the time of signing the agreement and $20,000 when the restaurant opens or on the agreed-upon development date, whichever comes first. Additionally, under our current standard master franchise agreement, the master franchisee is required to pay $15,000 for each sub-franchised restaurant – $5,000 at the time of signing the agreement and $10,000 when the restaurant opens or on the agreed-upon development date, whichever comes first. Our current standard international master franchise and development agreements provide for payment to us of a royalty fee of 5% of sales. For international markets with sub-franchise agreements, the effective sub-franchise royalty received by the Company is generally 3% of sales and the master franchisee generally receives a royalty of 2% of sales. The remaining terms applicable to the operation of individual restaurants are substantially equivalent to the terms of our domestic franchise agreement. From time to time, development agreements will be negotiated at other-than-standard terms for fees and royalties, and we may offer various development and royalty incentives to help drive net unit growth and results. Non-traditional Restaurant Development. We had 228 non-traditional domestic restaurants at December 27, 2015. Non-traditional restaurants generally cover venues or areas not originally targeted for traditional unit development, and our franchised non-traditional restaurants have terms differing from the standard agreements. Franchisee Loans. Selected domestic and international franchisees have borrowed funds from us, principally for the purchase of restaurants from us or other franchisees or for construction and development of new restaurants. Loans made to franchisees can bear interest at fixed or floating rates and in most cases are secured by the fixtures, equipment and signage of the restaurant and/or are guaranteed by the franchise owners. At December 27, 2015, net loans outstanding totaled $18.9 million. See “Note 11” of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for additional information. Domestic Franchise Insurance Program. Our franchisees may elect to purchase various insurance policies, such as health, general liability, non-owned automobile and workers’ compensation insurance, through our wholly-owned insurance agency. The Company bears no liability under this program. 8 Various third-party commercial insurance companies provide fully-insured coverage for these lines of business to franchisees participating in the franchise insurance program. Domestic Franchise Training and Support. Our domestic field support structure consists of franchise business directors, each of whom is responsible for serving an average of 130 franchised units. Our franchise business directors maintain open communication with the franchise community, relaying operating and marketing information and new initiatives between franchisees and us. Franchise business directors report to division vice presidents, who report to the Vice President North America Franchise Operations. Every franchisee is required to have a principal operator approved by us who satisfactorily completes our required training program. Principal operators for traditional restaurants are required to devote their full business time and efforts to the operation of the franchisee’s traditional restaurants. Each franchised restaurant manager is also required to complete our Company-certified management operations training program. Ongoing compliance with training is monitored by the Global Operations Support and Training team. Multi-unit franchisees are encouraged to appoint training store general managers or hire a full-time training coordinator certified to deliver Company-approved operational training programs. International Franchise Operations Support. We employ or contract with international business directors who are responsible for supporting one or more franchisees. The international business directors usually report to regional vice presidents. Senior management and corporate staff also support the international field teams in many areas, including but not limited to food safety, quality assurance, marketing, technology, operations training and financial analysis. Franchise Operations. All franchisees are required to operate their Papa John’s restaurants in compliance with our policies, standards and specifications, including matters such as menu items, ingredients, and restaurant design. Franchisees have full discretion in human resource practices, and generally have full discretion to determine the prices to be charged to customers, but we have the authority to set maximum price points for nationally advertised promotions. Franchise Advisory Council. We have a Franchise Advisory Council (“FAC”) that consists of Company and franchisee representatives of domestic restaurants. We also have a franchise advisory council in the United Kingdom (“UK FAC”). The FAC and UK FAC and subcommittees hold regular meetings to discuss new product and marketing ideas, operations, growth and other business issues. From time to time, certain domestic franchisees have also formed a separate franchise association for the purpose of communicating and addressing issues, needs and opportunities among its members. We currently communicate with, and receive input from, our franchisees in several forms, including through the FAC, UK FAC, annual operations conferences, system communications, national conference calls, various regional meetings conducted with franchisees throughout the year and ongoing communications from franchise business directors and international business directors in the field. Monthly webcasts are also conducted by the Company to discuss current operational, marketing or other issues affecting the domestic franchisees’ business. We are committed to communicating with our franchisees and receiving input from them. Industry and Competition The United States Quick Service Restaurant pizza (“QSR Pizza”) industry is mature and highly competitive with respect to price, service, location, food quality and product innovation. There are well- established competitors with substantially greater financial and other resources than Papa John’s. The category is largely fragmented and competitors include international, national and regional chains, as well as a large number of local independent pizza operators, any of which can utilize a growing number of 9 food delivery services. Some of our competitors have been in existence for substantially longer periods than Papa John’s and can have higher levels of restaurant penetration and stronger, more developed brand awareness in markets where we compete. According to industry sources, domestic QSR Pizza category sales, which includes dine-in, carry out and delivery, totaled approximately $33.8 billion in 2015, or an increase of 3% from the prior year. With respect to the sale of franchises, we compete with many franchisors of restaurants and other business concepts. There is also active competition for management personnel and attractive commercial real estate sites suitable for Papa John’s restaurants. Government Regulation We, along with our franchisees, are subject to various federal, state, local and international laws affecting the operation of our respective businesses, including laws and regulations related to the preparation and sale of food, including food safety and menu labeling. Each Papa John’s restaurant is subject to licensing and regulation by a number of governmental authorities, which include zoning, health, safety, sanitation, building and fire agencies in the state or municipality in which the restaurant is located. Difficulties in obtaining, or the failure to obtain, required licenses or approvals could delay or prevent the opening of a new restaurant in a particular area. Our QC Centers are licensed and subject to regulation by state and local health and fire codes, and the operation of our trucks is subject to federal and state transportation regulations. We are also subject to federal and state environmental regulations. In addition, our domestic system-wide restaurant operations are subject to various federal and state laws governing such matters as minimum wage requirements, benefits, working conditions, citizenship requirements, and overtime. We are subject to Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) regulation and various state laws regulating the offer and sale of franchises. The laws of several states also regulate substantive aspects of the franchisor- franchisee relationship. The FTC requires us to furnish to prospective franchisees a franchise disclosure document containing prescribed information. State laws that regulate the franchisor-franchisee relationship presently exist in a significant number of states and bills have been introduced in Congress from time to time that would provide for federal regulation of the U.S. franchisor-franchisee relationship in certain respects if such bills were enacted. The state laws often limit, among other things, the duration and scope of non-competition provisions and the ability of a franchisor to terminate or refuse to renew a franchise. Some foreign countries also have disclosure requirements and other laws regulating franchising and the franchisor-franchisee relationship. National, state and local government regulations or initiatives, including health care legislation, “living wage,” legislation imposing “joint employer liability” or other current or proposed regulations and increases in minimum wage rates affect Papa John’s as well as others within the restaurant industry. As we expand internationally, we are subject to applicable laws in each jurisdiction where franchised units are established. We are increasingly subject to laws and regulations that require us to disclose calorie content and other specific content of our food, including, fat, trans fat, and salt content. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA) requires us and many restaurant companies to disclose calorie information on their restaurant menus. The Food and Drug Administration has issued final rules to implement this provision beginning in December 2016 that would require restaurants to post the number of calories for most items on menus or menu boards and to make other nutritional information available. A number of states, counties and cities in which we do business have also enacted menu labeling laws. Government regulation of nutrition disclosure and advertising could result in increased costs of compliance and also impact consumer habits in a way that adversely impacts sales at our restaurants. For further information regarding governmental regulation, see Item 1A, Risk Factors. 10 Trademarks, Copyrights and Domain Names Our intellectual property rights are a significant part of our business. We have registered and continue to maintain federal registrations through the United States Patent and Trademark Office (the “USPTO”) for the marks PAPA JOHN’S, PIZZA PAPA JOHN’S & Design (our logo), BETTER INGREDIENTS. BETTER PIZZA., PIZZA PAPA JOHN’S BETTER INGREDIENTS. BETTER PIZZA. & Design, and PAPA REWARDS. We also own federal registrations through the USPTO for several ancillary marks, principally advertising slogans. Moreover, we have registrations for and/or have applied for PIZZA PAPA JOHN’S & Design in more than 100 foreign countries and the European Community, in addition to international registrations for PAPA JOHN’S and PIZZA PAPA JOHN’S BETTER INGREDIENTS. BETTER PIZZA. & Design in various foreign countries. From time to time, we are made aware of the use by other persons in certain geographical areas of names and marks that are the same as or substantially similar to our marks. It is our policy to pursue registration of our marks whenever possible and to vigorously oppose any infringement of our marks. We hold copyrights in authored works used in our business, including advertisements, packaging, training, and promotional materials. In addition, we have registered and maintain Internet domain names, including “papajohns.com.” Employees As of December 27, 2015, we employed approximately 22,350 persons, of whom approximately 19,500 were restaurant team members, approximately 900 were restaurant management personnel, approximately 750 were corporate personnel and approximately 1,200 were QC Center and Preferred personnel. Most restaurant team members work part-time and are paid on an hourly basis. None of our team members are covered by a collective bargaining agreement. We consider our team member relations to be good. Item 1A. Risk Factors We are subject to various risks that could have a negative effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. These risks could cause actual operating results to differ from those expressed in certain “forward looking statements” contained in this Form 10-K as well as in other Company communications. Before you invest in our securities you should carefully consider these risk factors together with all other information included in this Form 10-K and our other publicly filed documents. Our profitability may suffer as a result of competition in our industry. The QSR Pizza industry is mature and highly competitive. Competition is based on price, service, location, food quality, brand recognition and loyalty, product innovation, effectiveness of marketing and promotional activity, use of technology, and the ability to identify and satisfy consumer preferences. From time to time, we may need to reduce the prices for some of our products to respond to competitive and customer pressures, which may adversely affect our profitability. Additionally, when commodity and other costs increase, we may be limited in our ability to increase prices. With the significant levels of competition we may be required to increase investment spending in several areas including marketing and technology, which can decrease profitability. In addition to competition with our larger and more established competitors who have substantially greater financial and other resources then we do, we also face competition from new competitors and concepts such as fast casual pizza concepts. We also face additional competitive pressures from food delivery concepts using new delivery technologies, some of which may have more effective marketing. The emergence or growth of new competitors may make it difficult for us to maintain or increase our market share and could negatively impact our sales and our system-wide restaurant operations. 11 One of our competitive strengths is our Better Ingredients, Better Pizza brand promise. This means that we may use ingredients which cost more than the ingredients some of our competitors may use. Because of our investment in higher quality ingredients, we could have lower profit margins than some of our competitors if we are not able to maintain premium pricing for our products. Changes in consumer preferences or discretionary consumer spending could adversely impact our results. Changes in consumer preferences and trends (for example, changes in dietary preferences that could cause consumers to avoid pizza or some of its ingredients in favor of foods that are perceived as more healthful, lower-calorie or otherwise based on their ingredients or nutritional content) or preferences for a dining experience such as fast casual pizza concepts, could adversely affect our restaurant business. Also, our success depends to a significant extent on numerous factors affecting consumer confidence and discretionary consumer income and spending, such as general economic conditions and the level of employment. Any factors that could cause consumers to spend less on food or shift to lower-priced products could reduce sales or inhibit our ability to maintain or increase pricing, either of which could materially adversely affect our results of operations. Food safety and quality concerns may negatively impact our business and profitability. Incidents or reports of food- or water-borne illness or other food safety issues, investigations or other actions by food safety regulators, food contamination or tampering, employee hygiene and cleanliness failures, improper franchisee or employee conduct, or presence of communicable disease at our Company-owned and franchised restaurants, QC Centers, or suppliers could lead to product liability or other claims. If we were to experience any such incidents or reports, our brand and reputation could be negatively impacted. This could result in a significant decrease in customer traffic and could negatively impact our revenues and profits. Similar incidents or reports occurring at quick service restaurants unrelated to us could likewise create negative publicity, which could negatively impact consumer behavior towards us. We rely on our domestic and international suppliers, as do our franchisees, to provide quality ingredients and to comply with applicable laws and industry standards. A failure of one of our domestic or international suppliers to meet our quality standards, or meet domestic or international food industry standards, could result in a disruption in our supply chain and negatively impact our brand and our business and profitability. Our results depend upon our ability to differentiate our brand and our reputation for quality. Damage to our brand or reputation could negatively impact our business and financial results. Our brand has been highly rated in U.S. surveys, and we strive to build the value of our brand as we develop international markets. The value of our brand and demand for our products could be damaged by any incidents that harm consumer perceptions of the Company and our brand. As a result of the impact of social media, the value of our brand and the demand for our products could be quickly and seriously damaged due to the widespread publicity that can be associated with one or more of these incidents. We may not be able to effectively market our products or maintain key marketing partnerships. The success of our system-wide business depends on the effectiveness of our marketing and promotional plans. We may not be able to effectively execute our national or local marketing plans, particularly if lower sales result in reduced levels of funds from PJMF. Our marketing strategy utilizes relationships with well-known sporting events, athletes, celebrity personalities and our brand spokesman to market our products. Our business could suffer if we are not able to maintain key marketing relationships and sponsorships, or if we are unable to do so at a reasonable cost, and could require additional investments in 12 alternative marketing strategies. Actions taken by persons endorsing our products that harm their reputations could also cause harm to our brand. Changes in privacy law could adversely affect our ability to market our products effectively. We rely on a variety of direct marketing techniques, including email, text messages and postal mailings. Any future restrictions in federal, state or foreign laws regarding marketing and solicitation or international data protection laws that govern these activities could adversely affect the continuing effectiveness of email, text messages and postal mailing techniques and could force changes in our marketing strategies. If this occurs, we may need to develop alternative marketing strategies, which could impact the amount and timing of our revenues. We may not be able to execute our strategy or achieve our planned growth targets, which could negatively impact our business and our financial results. Our growth strategy depends on our and our franchisees’ ability to open new restaurants and to operate them on a profitable basis. We expect substantially all of our international unit growth and much of our domestic unit growth to be franchised units. Accordingly, our profitability increasingly depends upon royalty revenues from franchisees. If our franchisees are not able to operate their businesses successfully under our franchised business model, our results could suffer. Additionally, we may fail to attract new qualified franchisees or existing franchisees may close underperforming locations. Planned growth targets and the ability to operate new and existing restaurants profitably are affected by economic, regulatory and competitive conditions and consumer buying habits. Increased commodity or operating costs, including, but not limited to, employee compensation and benefits or insurance costs, could slow the rate of new store openings or increase the number of store closings. Our business is susceptible to adverse changes in local, national and global economic conditions, which could make it difficult for us to meet our growth targets. Additionally, we or our franchisees may face challenges securing financing, finding suitable store locations at acceptable terms or securing required domestic or foreign government permits and approvals. Our franchisees remain dependent on the availability of financing to remodel or renovate existing locations, upgrade systems and enhance technology, or construct and open new restaurants. From time to time, the Company may provide financing to certain franchisees and prospective franchisees in order to mitigate store closings, allow new units to open, or complete required upgrades. If we are unable or unwilling to provide such financing, which is a function of, among other things, a franchisee’s credit worthiness, the number of new restaurant openings may be slower than expected and our results of operations may be adversely impacted. To the extent we provide financing to franchisees in domestic and international markets, our results could be negatively impacted by negative performance of these franchisee loans. If we do not meet our growth targets or the expectations of the market for net restaurant openings or our other strategic objectives, our stock price could decline. We may be adversely impacted by increases in the cost of food ingredients and other costs. We are exposed to fluctuations in commodities. An increase in the cost, or sustained high levels of the cost of cheese or other commodities could adversely affect the profitability of our system-wide restaurant operations, particularly if we are unable to increase the selling price of our products to offset increased costs. Cheese, representing our largest food cost, and other commodities can be subject to significant cost fluctuations due to weather, availability, global demand and other factors that are beyond our control. Additionally, increases in labor, mileage, insurance and other costs, could adversely affect the profitability of our restaurant and QC Center businesses. Most of the factors affecting costs in our system- wide restaurant operations are beyond our control, and we may not be able to adequately mitigate these 13 costs or pass along these costs to our customers or franchisees, given the significant competitive pricing pressure. Our dependence on a sole supplier or a limited number of suppliers for some ingredients could result in disruptions to our business. Domestic restaurants purchase substantially all food and related products from our QC Centers. We are dependent on Leprino Foods Dairy Products Company (“Leprino”) as our sole supplier for cheese, one of our key ingredients. Leprino, one of the major pizza category suppliers of cheese in the United States, currently supplies all of our cheese domestically and substantially all of our cheese internationally. While we have no other sole sources of supply for key ingredients, we do source other key ingredients from a limited number of suppliers. Alternative sources of supply of cheese or other key ingredients may not be available on a timely basis or may not be available on terms as favorable to us as under our current arrangements. Our corporate and franchised restaurants could also be harmed by a prolonged disruption in the supply of products from or to our QC Centers due to weather, climate change, natural disasters, crop disease, labor dispute or interruption of service by carriers. In particular, adverse weather or crop disease affecting the California tomato crop could disrupt the supply of pizza sauce to our and our franchisees’ restaurants. Insolvency of key suppliers could also cause similar business interruptions and negatively impact our business. Natural disasters or other catastrophic events may disrupt our operations or supply chain. The occurrence of a natural disaster, epidemic, cyber attack or other catastrophic event may result in the closure of Company-owned or franchised restaurants, our corporate office, any of our QC Centers or the facilities of our suppliers, any of which could materially adversely affect our results of operations. Changes in purchasing practices by our domestic franchisees could harm our commissary business. Although our domestic franchisees currently purchase substantially all food products from our QC Centers, they are only required to purchase from our QC Centers tomato sauce, dough and other items we may designate as proprietary or integral to our system. Any changes in purchasing practices by domestic franchisees, which have become more sensitive to charges and other fees, such as seeking alternative approved suppliers of ingredients or other food products, could adversely affect the financial results of our QC Centers and the Company. Our current insurance may not be adequate and we may experience claims in excess of our reserves. Our insurance programs for workers’ compensation, owned and non-owned automobiles, general liability, property and team member health insurance coverage are funded by the Company up to certain retention levels, generally ranging from $100,000 to $500,000. These insurance programs or our program for cyber insurance may not be adequate to protect us, and it may be difficult or impossible to obtain additional coverage or maintain current coverage at a reasonable cost. We also have experienced increasing claims volatility and higher related costs for workers’ compensation, owned and non-owned automobiles and health claims. We estimate loss reserves based on historical trends, actuarial assumptions and other data available to us, but we may not be able to accurately estimate reserves. If we experience claims in excess of our projections, our business could be negatively impacted, and our franchisees could be similarly impacted by higher claims experience. 14 Our international operations are subject to increased risks and other factors that may make it more difficult to achieve or maintain profitability or meet planned growth rates. Our international operations could be negatively impacted by changes in international economic, political, security or health conditions in the countries in which the Company or our franchisees operate, especially in emerging markets. In addition, there are risks associated with differing business and social cultures and consumer preferences. We may also face limited availability for restaurant locations, higher location costs and difficulties in franchisee selection and financing. We may be subject to difficulties in sourcing and importing high-quality ingredients (and ensuring food safety) in a cost-effective manner, hiring and retaining qualified team members, marketing effectively and adequately investing in information technology, especially in emerging markets. Our international operations are also subject to additional risk factors, including import and export controls, compliance with anti-corruption and other foreign laws, changes in tax laws, difficulties enforcing intellectual property and contract rights in foreign jurisdictions, and the imposition of increased or new tariffs or trade barriers. We intend to continue to expand internationally, which would make the risks related to our international operations more significant over time. Our international results, which are substantially franchised, depend heavily on the operating capabilities and financial strength of our franchisees. Any changes in the ability of our franchisees to run their stores profitably in accordance with our operating procedures, or to effectively sub franchise stores, could result in brand damage, a higher number of restaurant closures and a reduction in the number of new restaurant openings. Our Company-owned store presence is currently limited to our stores in China, which are classified as held for sale. We may find it difficult to find a suitable buyer for our Company-owned stores in China in a timely fashion, or a new franchisee could develop the market more slowly than we anticipate, which could delay our growth in this market. Foreign currency or interest rate risks could adversely affect our financial results. Sales made by our franchisees in international markets are denominated in their local currencies, and fluctuations in the U.S. dollar occur relative to the local currencies. Accordingly, changes in currency exchange rates will cause our revenues and operating results to fluctuate. We have not historically hedged our exposure to foreign currency fluctuations. Our international revenues and earnings may be adversely impacted as the U.S. dollar rises against foreign currencies, because the local currency will translate into fewer U.S. dollars, which occurred in 2015. Additionally, the value of certain assets or loans denominated in local currencies may deteriorate. Other items denominated in U.S dollars including product imports or loans may also become more expensive, putting pressure on franchisees’ cash flows. Under our revolving credit facility, we are exposed to variable interest rates. A significant increase in interest rates or total borrowings could adversely affect our profitability. Additionally, rising interest rates could impact our franchisees and their ability to open new restaurants or operate existing restaurants profitably. Increasingly complex laws and regulations could adversely affect our business. We operate in an increasingly complex regulatory environment, and the cost of regulatory compliance is increasing. Our failure, or the failure of any of our franchisees, to comply with applicable U.S. and international labor, health care, food, health and safety, consumer protection, anti-bribery and corruption, competition, environmental and other laws, may result in civil and criminal liability, damages, fines and penalties. Enforcement of existing laws and regulations, changes in legal requirements, and/or evolving interpretations of existing regulatory requirements may result in increased compliance costs and create other obligations, financial or otherwise, that could adversely affect our business, financial condition or 15 operating results. Increased regulatory scrutiny of, and increased litigation and enforcement actions involving food matters and product marketing claims, may increase compliance and legal costs and create other obligations that could adversely affect our business, financial condition or operating results. Governments may also impose requirements and restrictions that impact our business. For example, some local government agencies have implemented ordinances that restrict the sale of certain food or drink products. Compliance with new or additional government laws or regulations, including menu labeling requirements, could increase costs and be harmful to system-wide restaurant sales. Non-compliance with laws or government regulations could result in enforcement actions or investigations and could have an adverse impact on our financial performance and our reputation. In addition, a change in our tax rates, or new tax legislation impacting our business or the restaurant industry could negatively impact our results. Changes in employment and labor laws, including health care legislation and minimum wage increases, could increase costs for our system-wide operations. We are subject to federal, state and foreign laws governing such matters as minimum wage requirements, overtime compensation, benefits, working conditions, citizenship requirements and discrimination and family and medical leave. Labor costs and labor-related benefits are primary components in the cost of operation of our domestic system-wide restaurants and QC Centers. Labor shortages, increased employee turnover and health care mandates could increase our system-wide labor costs. A significant number of hourly personnel are paid at rates closely related to the federal and state minimum wage requirements. Accordingly, the enactment of additional state or local minimum wage increases above federal wage rates or proposed Department of Labor regulations related to exempt employees could increase labor costs for our domestic system-wide operations. Additionally, social media may be used to foster negative perceptions of employment in our industry and promote strikes or boycotts. The Affordable Care Act, enacted in 2010, requires employers such as us to provide health insurance for all qualifying employees in the United States or pay penalties for not providing coverage. We, like other industry competitors, are complying with the law and are providing more extensive health benefits to employees than we had previously provided, and are subsidizing a larger portion of their insurance premiums. These additional costs could negatively impact our operational results. In addition, our franchisees subject to the ACA could face additional cost pressures from compliance with the legislation, which could reduce their future expansion of units. Failure to retain the services of our Founder, John Schnatter, as Chief Executive Officer, Chairman and brand spokesman, or to successfully execute succession planning, could harm our Company and brand. John H. Schnatter, our Founder, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, does not serve under an employment agreement, and we do not maintain key man life insurance on Mr. Schnatter. We also depend on the continued availability of Mr. Schnatter’s image and his services as spokesman in our advertising and promotion materials. While we have entered into a license agreement with Mr. Schnatter related to the use of certain intellectual property related to his name, likeness and image, our business and brand may be harmed if Mr. Schnatter’s services were not available to the Company for any reason or the reputation of Mr. Schnatter were negatively impacted. In addition, failure to effectively execute succession planning with respect to Mr. Schnatter and other senior leaders could harm our Company and brand. 16 The concentration of stock ownership with Mr. Schnatter may influence the outcome of certain matters requiring stockholder approval. The concentration of stock ownership by our Founder, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer allows him to substantially influence the outcome of certain matters requiring stockholder approval. As of December 27, 2015, he beneficially owned approximately 27% of our outstanding common stock. As a result, he may be able to substantially influence the strategic direction of the Company and the outcome of matters requiring approval by our stockholders. We rely on information technology to operate our businesses and maintain our competitiveness, and any failure to invest in or adapt to technological developments or industry trends could harm our business. We rely heavily on information systems, including digital ordering solutions, through which approximately half of our domestic sales originate. We also rely heavily on point-of-sale processing in our Company-owned and franchised restaurants for data collection and payment systems for the collection of cash, credit and debit card transactions, and other processes and procedures. Our ability to efficiently and effectively manage our business depends on the reliability and capacity of these technology systems. In addition, we anticipate that consumers will continue to have more options to place orders digitally, both domestically and internationally. Our failure to adequately invest in new technology, adapt to technological developments and industry trends, particularly our digital ordering capabilities, could result in a loss of customers and related market share. Additionally, we are in an environment where the technology life cycle is short which requires continued reinvestments in technology and increases the risk that our technology may not be customer centric or could become obsolete, inefficient or otherwise incompatible with other systems. We rely heavily on our international franchisees to maintain their own point-of-sale and on line ordering systems, which are often purchased from third party vendors. Disruptions of our critical business or information technology systems could harm our ability to compete and conduct our business. Our critical business and information technology systems could be damaged or interrupted by power loss, various technological failures, user errors, sabotage or acts of God. In particular, we may experience occasional interruptions of our digital ordering solutions, which make online ordering unavailable or slow to respond, negatively impacting sales and the experience of our customers. If our digital ordering solutions do not perform with adequate speed, our customers may be less inclined to return to our digital ordering solutions. Part of our technology infrastructure, such as our FOCUS point-of-sale system, is specifically designed for us and our operational systems, which could cause unexpected costs, delays or inefficiencies when infrastructure upgrades are needed or prolonged and widespread technological difficulties occur. Significant portions of our technology infrastructure are provided by third parties, and the performance of these systems is largely beyond our control. Failure of our third-party systems, and backup systems, to adequately perform, particularly as our online sales grow, could harm our business and the satisfaction of our customers. In addition, we may not have or be able to obtain adequate protection or insurance to mitigate the risks of these events or compensate for losses related to these events, which could damage our business and reputation and be expensive and difficult to remedy or repair. 17 Failure to maintain the integrity of internal or customer data could result in damages to our reputation, loss of sales, and/or subject us to litigation, penalties or significant costs. We are subject to a number of privacy and data protection laws and regulations. Our business requires the collection and retention of large volumes of internal and customer data, including credit card data and other personally identifiable information of our employees and customers housed in the various information systems we use. Constantly changing cyber security threats pose risks to the security of our systems and networks, and the confidentiality of our data. As techniques used in cyber attacks evolve, we may not be able to timely detect threats or anticipate and implement security measures. The integrity and protection of that customer, employee, franchisee and Company data are critical to us. The failure to prevent fraud or security breaches or to adequately invest in data security could harm our business and revenues due to the reputational damage to our brand. Such a breach could also result in litigation, regulatory actions, penalties, and other significant costs to us and have a material adverse effect on our financial results. These costs could be well in excess of our cyber insurance coverage. We have been and will continue to be subject to various types of investigations and litigation, including collective and class action litigation, which could subject us to significant damages or other remedies. We are subject to the risk of investigations and litigation from various parties, including vendors, customers, franchisees, state and federal agencies, stockholders and employees. From time to time, we are involved in a number of lawsuits, claims, investigations, and proceedings consisting of intellectual property, employment, consumer, personal injury, commercial and other matters arising in the ordinary course of business. We have been subject to claims in cases containing collective and class action allegations. Plaintiffs in these types of lawsuits often seek recovery of very large or indeterminate amounts, and the magnitude of the potential loss and defense costs relating to such lawsuits may not be accurately estimated. Litigation trends involving the relationship between franchisors and franchisees, personal injury claims, employment law and intellectual property may increase our cost of doing business. We evaluate all of the claims and proceedings involving us to assess the expected outcome, and where possible, we estimate the amount of potential losses to us. In many cases, particularly collective and class action cases, we may not be able to estimate the amount of potential losses and/or our estimates may prove to be insufficient. These assessments are made by management based on the information available at the time made and require the use of a significant amount of judgment, and actual outcomes or losses may materially differ. Regardless of whether any claims against us are valid, or whether we are ultimately held liable, such litigation may be expensive to defend and may divert resources away from our operations and negatively impact earnings. Further, we may not be able to obtain adequate insurance to protect us from these types of litigation matters or extraordinary business losses. We may not be able to adequately protect our intellectual property rights, which could negatively affect our results of operations. We depend on the Papa John’s brand name and rely on a combination of trademarks, service marks, copyrights, and similar intellectual property rights to protect and promote our brand. We believe the success of our business depends on our continued ability to exclusively use our existing marks to increase brand awareness and further develop our brand, both domestically and abroad. We may not be able to adequately protect our intellectual property rights, and we may be required to pursue litigation to prevent consumer confusion and preserve our brand’s high-quality reputation. Litigation could result in high costs and diversion of resources, which could negatively affect our results of operations, regardless of the outcome. 18 We may be subject to impairment charges. Impairment charges are possible due to the nature and timing of decisions we make about underperforming assets or markets, or if previously opened or acquired restaurants perform below our expectations. This could result in a decrease in our reported asset value and reduction in our net income. Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments None. Item 2. Properties As of December 27, 2015, there were 4,893 Papa John’s restaurants system-wide. The following tables provide the locations of our restaurants. We define “North America” as the United States and Canada and “domestic” as the contiguous United States. North America Restaurants: Alabama………………………………………………………… Alaska........................................................................................... Arizona …………………………………………………………. Arkansas………………………………………………………... California……………………………………………………….. Colorado………………………………………………………... Connecticut……………………………………………………... Delaware………………………………………………………... District of Columbia……………………………………………. Florida…………………………………………………………... Georgia …………………………………………………………. Hawaii........................................................................................... Idaho……………………………………………………………. Illinois........................................................................................... Indiana.......................................................................................... Iowa.............................................................................................. Kansas........................................................................................... Kentucky………………………………………………………... Louisiana……………………………………………………….. Maine…………………………………………………………… Maryland………………………………………………………... Massachusetts…………………………………………………... Michigan………………………………………………………... Minnesota..................................................................................... Mississippi.................................................................................... Missouri........................................................................................ Montana........................................................................................ Nebraska....................................................................................... Nevada………………………………………………………….. New Hampshire………………………………………………… New Jersey……………………………………………………… New Mexico……………………………………………………. New York………………………………………………………. North Carolina………………………………………………….. North Dakota…………………………………………………… Company - - 39 - - 32 - - - 47 95 - - 8 41 - 15 44 - - 60 - - 33 - 42 - - - - - - - 99 - Franchised 83 10 39 27 210 19 17 16 10 235 65 15 11 106 89 24 20 70 62 6 42 24 54 17 29 32 9 17 20 4 64 19 97 83 7 Total 83 10 78 27 210 51 17 16 10 282 160 15 11 114 130 24 35 114 62 6 102 24 54 50 29 74 9 17 20 4 64 19 97 182 7 19 North America Restaurants (continued): Ohio…………………………………………………………….. Oklahoma……………………………………………………….. Oregon………………………………………………………….. Pennsylvania……………………………………………………. Rhode Island……………………………………………………. South Carolina………………………………………………….. South Dakota…………………………………………………… Tennessee……………………………………………………….. Texas……………………………………………………………. Utah…………………………………………………………….. Vermont………………………………………………………… Virginia…………………………………………………………. Washington…………………………………………………....... West Virginia…………………………………………………… Wisconsin………………………………………………………. Wyoming……………………………………………………….. Total U.S. Papa John’s Restaurants…………………………. Canada………………………………………………………….. Total North America Papa John’s Restaurants……………… Company - - - - - 8 - 31 87 - - 26 - - - - 707 - 707 Franchised 163 31 15 96 5 65 13 82 199 32 1 117 54 21 28 9 2,583 98 2,681 International Restaurants: Azerbaijan………………………………………………………. Bahrain…………………………………………………………. Belarus…………………………………………………………. Bolivia…………………………………………………………. Cayman Islands…………………………………………............ Chile............................................................................................. China............................................................................................ Colombia...................................................................................... Costa Rica..................................................................................... Cyprus.......................................................................................... Dominican Republic..................................................................... Ecuador......................................................................................... Egypt............................................................................................ El Salvador................................................................................... Guam............................................................................................ Guatemala..................................................................................... India.............................................................................................. Ireland........................................................................................... Jordan........................................................................................... Kuwait.......................................................................................... Malaysia....................................................................................... Mexico.......................................................................................... Nicaragua...................................................................................... Oman............................................................................................ Panama......................................................................................... Peru............................................................................................... Philippines.................................................................................... 20 - - - - - - 45 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4 21 4 2 2 42 199 26 21 8 14 16 33 18 3 9 72 65 9 31 21 89 4 9 10 32 18 Total 163 31 15 96 5 73 13 113 286 32 1 143 54 21 28 9 3,290 98 3,388 4 21 4 2 2 42 244 26 21 8 14 16 33 18 3 9 72 65 9 31 21 89 4 9 10 32 18 International Restaurants (continued): Company Franchised Total Puerto Rico................................................................................... Qatar............................................................................................. Russia........................................................................................... Saudi Arabia................................................................................. Singapore...................................................................................... South Korea................................................................................. Trinidad........................................................................................ Turkey.......................................................................................... United Arab Emirates................................................................... United Kingdom........................................................................... Venezuela..................................................................................... Total International Papa John’s Restaurants........................... - - - - - - - - - - - 45 23 20 71 33 1 102 6 22 41 319 40 1,460 23 20 71 33 1 102 6 22 41 319 40 1,505 Note: Company-owned Papa John’s restaurants include restaurants owned by majority-owned subsidiaries. There were 213 such restaurants at December 27, 2015 (32 in Colorado, 35 in Maryland, 33 in Minnesota, 87 in Texas, and 26 in Virginia). Most Papa John’s Company-owned restaurants are located in leased space. The initial term of most domestic restaurant leases is generally five years with most leases providing for one or more options to renew for at least one additional term. Generally, the leases are triple net leases, which require us to pay all or a portion of the cost of insurance, taxes and utilities. Additionally, we lease our Company-owned restaurant sites in Beijing and North China. At December 27, 2015, we leased and subleased to franchisees in the United Kingdom 231 of the 319 franchised Papa John’s restaurant sites. The initial lease terms on the franchised sites in the United Kingdom are generally 10 to 15 years. The initial lease terms of the franchisee subleases are generally five to ten years. Seven of our ten domestic QC Centers are located in leased space, including the following locations: Raleigh, NC; Denver, CO; Phoenix, AZ; Des Moines, IA; Portland, OR; Pittsburgh, PA; and Cranbury, NJ. We are party to a lease for an eleventh QC Center in Acworth, GA that is expected to open in 2017. Our remaining three locations are in buildings we own, located in: Orlando, FL; Dallas, TX; and Louisville, KY. Additionally, our corporate headquarters and our printing operations are located in Louisville, KY in buildings owned by us. Internationally, we own a full-service QC Center and lease office space in the United Kingdom. We also lease our QC Centers and office space in Beijing, China and Mexico City, Mexico. Item 3. Legal Proceedings The Company is involved in a number of lawsuits, claims, investigations and proceedings, including those specifically identified below, consisting of intellectual property, employment, consumer, commercial and other matters arising in the ordinary course of business. In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 450, “Contingencies,” the Company has made accruals with respect to these matters, where appropriate, which are reflected in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. We review these provisions at least quarterly and adjust these provisions to reflect the impact of negotiations, settlements, rulings, advice of legal counsel and other information and events pertaining to a particular case. Perrin v. Papa John’s International, Inc. and Papa John’s USA, Inc. is a conditionally certified collective and class action filed in August 2009 in the United States District Court, Eastern District of Missouri 21 (“the Court”), alleging that delivery drivers were not properly reimbursed for mileage and expenses in accordance with the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”). Approximately 3,900 drivers out of a potential class size of 28,800 opted into the action. In December 2013, the Court granted a motion for class certification in five additional states, which added approximately 15,000 plaintiffs to the case. The parties reached a settlement in principle, which was preliminarily approved by the Court in September 2015. With the preliminary settlement agreement, the Company recorded a pre-tax expense of $12.3 million in June 2015 under the provisions of ASC 450, Contingencies. This amount is separately reported as Legal settlement expense in the consolidated statements of income. The Court issued its final order approving the settlement on January 12, 2016, with no changes to the previously recorded expense. The Company then remitted funds to the administrator for the payment of claims and plaintiffs’ attorney fees. The Company continues to deny any wrongdoing in this matter. Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures None. EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT Set forth below are the current executive officers of Papa John’s: Name John H. Schnatter Age (a) 54 Founder, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Position First Elected Executive Officer Steve M. Ritchie 41 President and Chief Operating Officer Timothy C. O’Hern Lance F. Tucker 52 46 Senior Vice President and Chief Development Officer Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Administrative Officer and Treasurer (a) Ages are as of January 1, 2016. John H. Schnatter created the Papa John’s concept and started operations in 1984. He currently serves as Founder, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. He previously served as Interim Chief Executive Officer from December 2008 to April 2009, Executive Chairman of the Company from 2005 until May 2007, as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer from 1990 until 2005, and as President from 1985 to 1990, from 2001 until 2005 and from 2014 to 2015. Steve M. Ritchie was appointed President and Chief Operating Officer in July 2015 after serving as Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer since May 2014. Mr. Ritchie has served as a Senior Vice President since May 2013 and in various capacities of increasing responsibility over Global Operations & Global Operations Support and Training since July 2010. Since 2006, he also has served as a franchise owner and operator of multiple units in the Company's Midwest Division. 22 1985 2012 2005 2011 Timothy C. O'Hern was appointed Senior Vice President and Chief Development Officer in July 2012. He previously served as Senior Vice President, Development since June 2009, a position he previously held from 2005 until 2007. From 2002 until 2005 and from 2007 until 2009, he managed the operations of a Papa John's franchisee in which he has an ownership interest. Prior to his departure from Papa John's in 2002, Mr. O'Hern held various positions, including Vice President of Global Development from February 2001 to 2002, Vice President of U.S. Development from March 1997 to February 2001, Director of Franchise Development from December 1996 to March 1997 and Construction Manager from November 1995 to December 1996. He has been a franchisee since 1993. Lance F. Tucker was appointed Chief Administrative Officer in July 2012 and Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer in February 2011. Mr. Tucker previously held the positions of Chief of Staff and Senior Vice President, Strategic Planning from June 2010 to February 2011, after serving as Chief of Staff and Vice President, Strategic Planning since June 2009. Mr. Tucker was previously employed by the Company from 1994 to 1999 working in its finance department. From 2003 to 2009, Mr. Tucker served as Chief Financial Officer of Evergreen Real Estate, a company owned by John Schnatter. Mr. Tucker is a licensed Certified Public Accountant. There are no family relationships between any of the directors or executive officers of the Company. PART II Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities Our common stock trades on The NASDAQ Global Select Market tier of The NASDAQ Stock Market under the symbol PZZA. As of February 16, 2016, there were 785 record holders of common stock. However, there are significantly more beneficial owners of our common stock than there are record holders. The following table sets forth, for the quarters indicated, the high and low sales prices of our common stock, as reported by The NASDAQ Stock Market, and dividends declared per common share: 2015 First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter High $ 65.96 76.38 79.40 74.52 $ Low 55.15 60.06 63.96 53.65 2014 First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter High $ 55.00 52.72 45.50 57.00 $ Low 44.95 40.00 37.32 39.49 Dividends Declared per Share 0.140 $ 0.140 0.175 0.175 Dividends Declared per Share $ 0.125 0.125 0.140 0.140 23 Our Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.175 per share on January 27, 2016 that was payable on February 19, 2016 to shareholders of record at the close of business on February 8, 2016. We anticipate continuing the payment of quarterly cash dividends. The actual amount of such dividends is subject to declaration by our Board of Directors and will depend upon future earnings, results of operations, capital requirements, our financial condition and other relevant factors. There can be no assurance that the Company will continue to pay quarterly cash dividends. Our Board of Directors has authorized the repurchase of up to $1.525 billion of common stock under a share repurchase program that began December 9, 1999, and expires February 28, 2017. This includes $125 million authorized in October 2015 and an additional $75 million authorized in February 2016. Through December 27, 2015, a total of 107.4 million shares with an aggregate cost of $1.3 billion and an average price of $12.24 per share have been repurchased under this program. Subsequent to year-end, we acquired an additional 860,000 shares at an aggregate cost of $42.6 million. Approximately $167.1 million remained available under the Company’s share repurchase program as of February 16, 2016. The following table summarizes our repurchase activity by fiscal period during the fourth quarter ended December 27, 2015 (in thousands, except per share amounts): Total Number of Shares Purchased Average Price Paid per Share Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs Maximum Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs Fiscal Period 09/28/2015 - 10/25/2015 10/26/2015 - 11/22/2015 11/23/2015 - 12/27/2015 174 171 292 $68.76 $63.53 $57.46 106,992 107,163 107,455 $237,335 $226,466 $209,681 Our share repurchase authorization increased from $1.45 billion to $1.525 billion in February 2016. For presentation purposes, the maximum dollar value of shares that may be purchased was adjusted retroactively to September 28, 2015. The Company utilizes a written trading plan under Rule 10b5-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, from time to time to facilitate the repurchase of shares of our common stock under this share repurchase program. There can be no assurance that we will repurchase shares of our common stock either through a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan or otherwise. 24 Stock Performance Graph The following performance graph compares the cumulative shareholder return of the Company’s common stock for the five-year period between December 26, 2010 and December 27, 2015 to (i) the NASDAQ Stock Market (U.S.) Index and (ii) a group of the Company’s peers consisting of U.S. companies listed on NASDAQ with standard industry classification (SIC) codes 5800-5899 (eating and drinking places). Management believes the companies included in this peer group appropriately reflect the scope of the Company’s operations and match the competitive market in which the Company operates. The graph assumes the value of the investments in the Company’s common stock and in each index was $100 on December 26, 2010, and that all dividends were reinvested. 25 Item 6. Selected Financial Data The selected financial data presented for each of the fiscal years in the five-year period ended December 27, 2015, were derived from our audited consolidated financial statements. The selected financial data below should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the “Consolidated Financial Statements” and Notes thereto included in Item 7 and Item 8, respectively, of this Form 10-K. (In thousands, except per share data) Year Ended (1) Income Statement Data North America revenues: Domestic Company-owned restaurant sales Franchise royalties (2) Franchise and development fees Domestic commissary sales Other sales International revenues: Royalties and franchise and development fees (3) Restaurant and commissary sales (4) Total revenues Dec. 27, 2015 Dec. 28, 2014 Dec. 29, 2013 Dec. 30, 2012 Dec. 25, 2011 52 weeks 52 weeks 52 weeks 53 weeks 52 weeks $ 756,307 95,046 1,010 615,610 64,711 $ 701,854 89,443 726 629,492 74,179 $ 635,317 81,692 1,181 578,870 53,322 $ 592,203 79,567 806 545,924 51,223 $ 525,841 73,694 722 508,155 50,912 27,289 77,402 1,637,375 25,730 76,725 1,598,149 21,979 66,661 1,439,022 19,881 53,049 1,342,653 16,327 42,231 1,217,882 Operating income Legal settlement expense Investment income Interest expense Income before income taxes Income tax expense Net income before attribution to noncontrolling interests Income attributable to noncontrolling interests (5) Net income attributable to the Company 136,307 (12,278) 794 (5,676) 119,147 37,183 81,964 (6,282) 75,682 $ 117,630 - 702 (4,077) 114,255 36,558 77,697 (4,382) 73,315 $ 106,503 - 589 (983) 106,109 33,130 72,979 (3,442) 69,537 $ 99,807 - 750 (2,162) 98,395 32,393 66,002 (4,342) 61,660 $ 87,017 - 755 (2,981) 84,791 26,324 58,467 (3,732) 54,735 $ Net income attributable to common shareholders $ 75,422 $ 72,869 $ 68,497 $ 61,660 $ 54,735 Basic earnings per common share $ 1.91 $ 1.78 $ 1.58 $ 1.31 $ 1.09 Diluted earnings per common share $ 1.89 $ 1.75 $ 1.55 $ 1.29 $ 1.08 Basic weighted average common shares outstanding Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding 39,458 40,000 40,960 41,718 43,387 44,243 46,916 47,810 50,086 50,620 Dividends declared per common share $ 0.63 $ 0.53 $ 0.25 $ - $ - Balance Sheet Data Total assets Total debt Mandatorily redeemable noncontrolling interests (6) Redeemable noncontrolling interests Total stockholders’ equity $ 494,912 256,000 - 8,363 42,206 $ 504,555 230,451 - 8,555 98,715 $ 464,291 157,900 10,786 7,024 138,184 $ 438,408 88,258 11,837 6,380 181,514 $ 390,382 51,489 11,065 3,965 205,647 (1) We operate on a 52-53 week fiscal year ending on the last Sunday of December of each year. The 2012 fiscal year consisted of 53 weeks and all other years above consisted of 52 weeks. The additional week resulted in additional revenues of approximately $21.5 million and additional income before income taxes of approximately $4.1 million, or $0.05 per diluted share for 2012. (2) North America franchise royalties were derived from franchised restaurant sales of $2.13 billion in 2015, $2.04 billion in 2014, $1.91 billion in 2013, $1.85 billion in 2012 ($1.82 billion on a 52 week basis) and $1.71 billion in 2011. (3) International royalties were derived from franchised restaurant sales of $592.7 million in 2015, $553.0 million in 2014, $460.0 million in 2013, $388.4 million in 2012 ($379.4 million on a 52 week basis) and $320.0 million in 2011. 26 (4) Restaurant sales for international Company-owned restaurants were $19.3 million in 2015, $23.7 million in 2014, $22.7 million in 2013, $16.2 million in 2012 and $12.4 million in 2011. (5) Represents the noncontrolling interests’ allocation of income for our joint venture arrangements. (6) Represents the redemption value of a mandatorily redeemable noncontrolling interest. Upon removal of the redemption feature during 2014, the noncontrolling interest was reclassified from other long- term liabilities to stockholders’ equity in the consolidated balance sheet. Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Introduction Papa John’s International, Inc. (referred to as the “Company,” “Papa John’s” or in the first person notations of “we,” “us” and “our”) began operations in 1984. At December 27, 2015, there were 4,893 Papa John’s restaurants in operation, consisting of 752 Company-owned and 4,141 franchised restaurants. Our revenues are principally derived from retail sales of pizza and other food and beverage products to the general public by Company-owned restaurants. Additionally, approximately 43% to 46% of our domestic revenues in each of the last three years were derived from sales to franchisees of various items including food and paper products, printing and promotional items, risk management services and information systems equipment, including the FOCUS point-of-sale system, and software and related services. We believe that in addition to supporting both Company and franchised profitability and growth, these activities contribute to product quality and consistency throughout the Papa John’s system. New unit openings in 2015 were 357 as compared to 388 in 2014 and 386 in 2013 and unit closings in 2015 were 127 as compared to 153 in 2014 and 121 in 2013. We expect net unit growth of approximately 180 to 210 units during 2016, of which 70-80% will be international locations. Our expansion strategy is to cluster restaurants in targeted markets, thereby increasing consumer awareness and enabling us to take advantage of operational, distribution and advertising efficiencies. We continue to generate strong sales in our North America Company-owned restaurants in a very competitive environment. Average annual Company-owned sales for our most recent domestic comparable restaurant base were $1.12 million for 2015, compared to $1.06 million for 2014 and $988,000 for 2013. Average sales volumes in new markets are generally lower than in those markets in which we have established a significant market position. The comparable sales for domestic Company- owned restaurants increased 5.9% in 2015, 8.2% in 2014 and 6.6% in 2013. “Comparable sales” represents sales generated by restaurants open for the entire twelve-month period reported. We are pleased with the ongoing growth in both our North America and international franchise restaurant sales. The comparable sales for North America franchised units increased 3.6% in 2015, 6.2% in 2014 and 3.1% in 2013. The comparable sales for International franchised units increased 7.3% in 2015, 7.8% in 2014 and 7.5% in 2013. We strive to obtain high-quality restaurant sites with good access and visibility, and to enhance the appearance and quality of our restaurants. We believe these factors improve our image and brand awareness. The average cash investment for the 11 domestic traditional Company-owned restaurants opened during 2015 was approximately $319,000, compared to the $283,000 investment for the 11 domestic traditional units opened in 2014, exclusive of land and any tenant improvement allowances we received. Over the past few years we have experienced an increase in the cost of our new restaurants primarily as a result of building larger units to accommodate increased sales, an increase in the cost of certain equipment as a result of technology enhancements, and increased costs to comply with local regulations. 27 Planned Sale of China Company-owned Operations In September 2015, the Company decided to refranchise the China Company-owned market and is planning a sale of its existing China operations, consisting of 45 Company-owned restaurants and a commissary. We expect to sell the business during 2016; upon completion of the sale, the Company will not have any Company-owned international restaurants. We have classified the assets as held for sale within the consolidated balance sheet. Upon the classification of these assets to held for sale, no loss was recognized as their fair value exceeded their carrying value. The Company-owned China operations incurred losses before income taxes of $1.2 million in 2015 and $3.4 million in 2014, which are recorded in our International segment. The loss in 2014 includes an impairment and disposition charge of $1.0 million for eleven Company-owned restaurants in China. We do not expect the sale of our China operations to have a significant impact on our financial results. See “Note 7” of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for additional information. Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates The results of operations are based on our consolidated financial statements, which were prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). The preparation of consolidated financial statements requires management to select accounting policies for critical accounting areas as well as estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements. The Company’s significant accounting policies are more fully described in “Note 2” of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.” Significant changes in assumptions and/or conditions in our critical accounting policies could materially impact the operating results. We have identified the following accounting policies and related judgments as critical to understanding the results of our operations: Allowance for Doubtful Accounts and Notes Receivable We establish reserves for uncollectible accounts and notes receivable based on overall receivable aging levels and a specific evaluation of accounts and notes for franchisees and other customers with known financial difficulties. Balances are charged off against the allowance after recovery efforts have ceased. Noncontrolling Interests The Company has the following four joint ventures in which there are noncontrolling interests as of December 27, 2015: Joint Venture Redemption Feature Location within the Consolidated Balance Sheet Recorded value Star Papa, LP PJ Denver, LLC Colonel’s Limited, LLC No redemption feature No redemption feature PJ Minnesota, LLC Redeemable Redeemable Temporary equity Temporary equity Permanent equity Permanent equity Carrying value Redemption value Carrying value Carrying value Consolidated net income is required to be reported separately at amounts attributable to both the parent and the noncontrolling interest. Disclosures are required to clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent company and the interests of the noncontrolling owners, including a disclosure on the face of the consolidated statements of income attributable to the noncontrolling interest holder. 28 See “Note 6” of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for additional information. Stock Based Compensation Compensation expense for equity grants is estimated on the grant date, net of projected forfeitures and is recognized over the vesting period (generally in equal installments over three years). Restricted stock is valued based on the market price of the Company’s shares on the date of grant. Stock options are valued using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. Our specific assumptions for estimating the fair value of options include the following: Assumptions (weighted average): Risk-free interest rate Expected dividend yield Expected volatility Expected term (in years) 2015 2014 2013 1.6% 0.9% 28.5% 5.5 1.8% 1.0% 35.7% 6.0 1.1% 0.1% 37.5% 6.0 The risk-free interest rate for the periods within the contractual life of an option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The expected dividend yield was estimated as the annual dividend divided by the market price of the Company’s shares on the date of grant. Expected volatility was estimated by using the Company’s historical share price volatility for a period similar to the expected life of the option. See “Note 18” of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for additional information. Intangible Assets – Goodwill We evaluate goodwill annually in the fourth quarter or whenever we identify certain triggering events or circumstances that would more-likely-than-not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. Such tests are completed separately with respect to the goodwill of each of our reporting units, which includes our domestic Company-owned restaurants, China and the United Kingdom (“PJUK”). We may perform a qualitative assessment or move directly to the quantitative assessment for any reporting unit in any period if we believe that it is more efficient or if impairment indicators exist. We elected to perform a qualitative assessment for our domestic Company-owned restaurants and PJUK reporting units in 2015. As a result of our qualitative analyses, we determined that it was more-likely- than-not that the fair values of our reporting units were greater than their carrying amounts. We performed a quantitative analysis for the goodwill of our China reporting unit using a market approach. The market approach considered earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) multiples that a potential buyer would pay based on third-party transactions in similar markets. The results of our quantitative assessment indicated the fair value significantly exceeded the carrying amount. Subsequent to completing our goodwill impairment tests, no indications of impairment were identified. See “Note 8” of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for additional information. 29 Insurance Reserves Our insurance programs for workers’ compensation, owned and non-owned automobiles, general liability, property, and health insurance coverage provided to our employees are funded by the Company up to certain retention levels. Retention limits generally range from $100,000 to $500,000 per occurrence. Losses are accrued based upon undiscounted estimates of the aggregate retained liability for claims incurred using certain third-party actuarial projections and our claims loss experience. The estimated insurance claims losses could be significantly affected should the frequency or ultimate cost of claims differ significantly from historical trends used to estimate the insurance reserves recorded by the Company. See “Note 12” of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for additional information. Deferred Income Tax Accounts and Tax Reserves Papa John’s is subject to income taxes in the United States and several foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in determining Papa John’s provision for income taxes and the related assets and liabilities. The provision for income taxes includes income taxes paid, currently payable or receivable and those deferred. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities, and are measured using enacted tax rates and laws that are expected to be in effect when the differences reverse. Deferred tax assets are also recognized for the estimated future effects of tax loss carryforwards. The effect on deferred taxes of changes in tax rates is recognized in the period in which the new tax rate is enacted. Valuation allowances are established when necessary on a jurisdictional basis to reduce deferred tax assets to the amounts we expect to realize. As of December 27, 2015, we had a net deferred income tax liability of approximately $2.2 million. Tax authorities periodically audit the Company. We record reserves and related interest and penalties for identified exposures as income tax expense. We evaluate these issues and adjust for events, such as statute of limitations expirations, court rulings or audit settlements, which may impact our ultimate payment for such exposures. We recognized increases in income tax expense of $731,000 in 2015 and $117,000 in 2014 and a decrease in income tax expense of $909,000 in 2013 associated with the finalization of certain income tax matters. See “Note 15” of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for additional information. Fiscal Year Our fiscal year ends on the last Sunday in December of each year. All fiscal years presented in the accompanying consolidated financial statements consist of 52 weeks. Two-for-One Stock Split The Company completed a two-for-one stock split of the Company’s outstanding shares of stock in December 2013 effected in the form of a stock dividend. Shareholders of record on December 12, 2013 received one additional share for each outstanding share of stock held on the record date. The stock dividend was distributed effective December 27, 2013. All share and per-share amounts have been adjusted to reflect the stock split. 30 FOCUS System As of December 27, 2015, we have implemented FOCUS, our new, proprietary point-of-sale system in our domestic Company-owned and franchised restaurants. FOCUS had the following impact on our consolidated statements of income for the years ended December 27, 2015 and December 28, 2014 (in thousands): Ye ar Ende d Dec. 27, 2015 De c. 28, 2014 Franchise royalties (a) Other sales (b) Other operating expenses (c) Depreciation and amortization (d) Net decrease in income before income taxes $ $ (2,427) 9,885 (9,983) (5,014) (7,539) (405) 20,143 (20,629) (2,834) (3,725) $ $ Diluted earnings per common share $ (0.13) $ (0.06) (a) Royalty incentive program tied to franchise rollout of FOCUS. (b) Represents revenues for equipment installed at domestic franchised restaurants. (c) Includes cost of sales associated with equipment installed at franchised restaurants and other costs to support the rollout of the program. (d) Includes depreciation expense for both the capitalized software and for equipment installed at Company-owned restaurants, which are being depreciated over five and seven years, respectively. 31 Items Impacting Comparability; Non-GAAP Measures The following table reconciles our GAAP financial results to the adjusted (non-GAAP) financial results, excluding the 2015 legal settlement expense for Perrin v. Papa John’s International, Inc. and Papa John’s USA, Inc., a conditionally certified collective and class action that was settled in 2016. We present these non-GAAP measures because we believe the legal settlement impacts the comparability of our results of operations. For additional information about the legal settlement, see “Note 17” of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.” (In thousands, except per share amounts) Income before income taxes, as reported Legal settlement expense Income before income taxes, as adjusted Net income, as reported Legal settlement expense Net income, as adjusted Diluted earnings per share, as reported Legal settlement expense Diluted earnings per share, as adjusted Dec. 27, 2015 Year Ended Dec. 28, 2014 Dec. 29 2013 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 119,147 12,278 131,425 75,682 7,986 83,668 1.89 0.20 2.09 114,255 - 114,255 73,315 - 73,315 1.75 - 1.75 106,109 - 106,109 69,537 - 69,537 1.55 - 1.55 The non-GAAP results shown above and within this document, which exclude the legal settlement, should not be construed as a substitute for or a better indicator of the Company’s performance than the Company’s GAAP results. Management believes presenting certain financial information without the legal settlement is important for purposes of comparison to prior year results. In addition, management uses this metric to evaluate the Company’s underlying operating performance and to analyze trends. See “Results of Operations” for further analysis regarding the impact of the legal settlement. In addition, we present free cash flow in this report, which is a non-GAAP measure. We define free cash flow as net cash provided by operating activities (from the consolidated statements of cash flows) less the purchases of property and equipment. We view free cash flow as an important measure because it is one factor that management uses in determining the amount of cash available for discretionary investment. Free cash flow is not a term defined by GAAP, and as a result, our measure of free cash flow might not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies. Free cash flow should not be construed as a substitute for or a better indicator of our performance than the Company’s GAAP measures. See “Liquidity and Capital Resources” for a reconciliation of free cash flow to the most directly comparable GAAP measure. The presentation of the non-GAAP measures in this report is made alongside the most directly comparable GAAP measures. 32 Percentage Relationships and Restaurant Data and Unit Progression The following tables set forth the percentage relationship to total revenues, unless otherwise indicated, of certain income statement data, and certain restaurant data for the years indicated: Income Statement Data: North America revenues: Domestic Company-owned restaurant sales Franchise royalties Franchise and development fees Domestic commissary sales Other sales International revenues: Royalties and franchise and development fees Restaurant and commissary sales Total revenues Costs and expenses: Domestic Company-owned restaurant cost of sales (2) Domestic Company-owned restaurant operating expenses (2) Domestic commissary cost of sales (3) Domestic commissary operating expenses (3) Other operating expenses (4) International restaurant and commissary expenses (5) General and administrative expenses Other general expenses Depreciation and amortization Total costs and expenses Operating income Legal settlement expense Net interest expense Income before income taxes Income tax expense Net income before attribution to noncontrolling interests Income attributable to noncontrolling interests Net income attributable to the Company Dec. 27, 2015 Year Ended (1) Dec. 28, 2014 Dec. 29, 2013 46.2% 5.8 0.1 37.6 3.9 1.7 4.7 100.0 23.7 56.2 76.6 15.7 94.1 82.0 9.6 0.4 2.5 91.7 8.3 (0.7) (0.3) 7.3 2.3 5.0 (0.4) 4.6% 43.9% 5.6 0.1 39.4 4.6 1.6 4.8 100.0 25.0 56.5 78.3 14.6 95.8 83.0 8.8 0.5 2.5 92.6 7.4 0.0 (0.2) 7.2 2.3 4.9 (0.3) 4.6% 44.2% 5.7 0.1 40.2 3.7 1.5 4.6 100.0 24.6 56.9 77.5 14.8 90.0 84.9 9.3 0.5 2.4 92.6 7.4 0.0 (0.1) 7.3 2.3 5.0 (0.2) 4.8% 33 Dec. 27, 2015 Year Ended (1) Dec. 28, 2014 Dec. 29, 2013 Restaurant Data: Percentage increase in comparable domestic Company-owned restaurant sales (6) Number of domestic Company-owned restaurants included in the most recent full year's comparable restaurant base Average sales for domestic Company-owned restaurants included in the most recent comparable restaurant base 5.9% 8.2% 6.6% 667 646 633 $1,116,000 $1,064,000 $988,000 Papa John's Restaurant Progression: North America Company-owned: Beginning of period Opened Closed Acquired from franchisees End of period International Company-owned: Beginning of period Opened Closed Sold to franchisees End of period North America franchised: Beginning of period Opened Closed Sold to Company End of period International franchised: Beginning of period Opened Closed Acquired from Company End of period Total Papa John's restaurants - end of period 686 16 (2) 7 707 49 - (4) - 45 2,654 106 (72) (7) 2,681 1,274 235 (49) - 1,460 4,893 665 12 (4) 13 686 58 2 (7) (4) 49 2,621 132 (86) (13) 2,654 1,084 242 (56) 4 1,274 4,663 648 19 (2) - 665 48 11 (1) - 58 2,556 152 (87) - 2,621 911 204 (31) - 1,084 4,428 (1) We operate on a fiscal year ending on the last Sunday of December of each year. (2) As a percentage of domestic Company-owned restaurant sales. (3) As a percentage of domestic commissary sales. (4) As a percentage of other sales. (5) As a percentage of international restaurant and commissary sales. (6) Represents the change in year-over-year sales for Company-owned restaurants open throughout the periods being compared. 34 Results of Operations 2015 Compared to 2014 Discussion of Revenues. Consolidated revenues increased $39.2 million, or 2.5%, to $1.64 billion in 2015, compared to $1.60 billion in 2014. Revenues are summarized in the following table on a reporting segment basis. Year Ended Dec. 27, 2015 Dec. 28, 2014 Increase (Decrease) $ Increase (Decrease) % (In thousands) North America Revenues: Domestic Company-owned restaurant sales Franchise royalties Franchise and development fees Domestic commissary sales Other sales $ 756,307 95,046 1,010 615,610 64,711 $ 701,854 89,443 726 629,492 74,179 $ 54,453 5,603 284 (13,882) (9,468) International Revenues: Royalties and franchise and development fees Restaurant and commissary sales Total Revenues 27,289 77,402 1,637,375 $ 25,730 76,725 1,598,149 $ 1,559 677 39,226 $ 7.8% 6.3% 39.1% -2.2% -12.8% 6.1% 0.9% 2.5% The increase in revenues in 2015 compared to 2014 was primarily due to the following: • Domestic Company-owned restaurant sales increased $54.5 million, or 7.8% primarily due to an increase of 5.9% in comparable sales and a 2.7% increase in equivalent units. “Equivalent units” represents the number of restaurants open at the beginning of a given period, adjusted for restaurants opened, closed, acquired or sold during the period on a weighted average basis. • North America franchise royalty revenue increased approximately $5.6 million, or 6.3%, primarily due to a 3.6% increase in comparable sales, an increase of 1.0% in equivalent units and lower royalty incentives. • Domestic commissary sales decreased $13.9 million, or 2.2%, as lower revenues associated with lower cheese prices were somewhat offset by increases in restaurant sales volume. Pricing for cheese is based on a fixed dollar markup; when cheese prices decrease, revenues decrease with no overall impact on the related dollar margin. • • Other sales decreased approximately $9.5 million, or 12.8%, primarily due to lower FOCUS equipment sales in 2015, as anticipated. The higher levels of FOCUS equipment sales in 2014 had no significant impact on operating results. See the FOCUS System section above for additional information. International royalties and franchise and development fees increased approximately $1.6 million, or 6.1%, primarily due to higher royalties from an increase in the number of franchised restaurants and a 7.3% increase in franchised comparable sales, calculated on a constant dollar basis. The negative impact of foreign currency exchange rates reduced our revenues by approximately $2.7 million in 2015. International restaurant and commissary sales increased approximately $700,000, or 0.9%, primarily due to an increase in commissary and other revenues, particularly in the United Kingdom, with increases in units and higher comparable sales. This increase was somewhat offset by lower sales at China Company-owned restaurants due to the disposition of eleven restaurants in 2014 and negative comparable sales. Additionally, sales were negatively impacted $4.8 million by foreign currency exchange rates. • 35 Discussion of Operating Results Our income before income taxes totaled $119.1 million in 2015, as compared to $114.3 million in 2014, an increase of approximately $4.9 million. Excluding the previously discussed legal settlement, income before income taxes was $131.4 million in 2015, or an increase of 15.0%. Income before income taxes is summarized in the following table on a reporting segment basis. Alongside the GAAP income before income taxes data, we have included “adjusted” income before income taxes for 2015 to exclude the legal settlement expense. We believe this non-GAAP measure is important for purposes of comparing to prior year results. (In thousands) Domestic Company-owned restaurants Domestic commissaries North America franchising International All others Unallocated corporate expenses Elimination of intersegment profits Total income before income taxes (a) Year Ended As Reported Dec. 27, 2015 Legal Settlement Expense Adjusted Dec. 27, 2015 Dec. 28, 2014 Increase (Decrease) $ $ $ $ 56,452 44,721 83,315 10,891 845 (75,896) (1,181) 119,147 - $ - - - - 12,278 - 12,278 $ 56,452 44,721 83,315 10,891 845 (63,618) (1,181) 131,425 40,969 39,317 77,009 7,250 (9) (49,440) (841) 114,255 15,483 5,404 6,306 3,641 854 (14,178) (340) 17,170 $ $ $ $ (a) Includes FOCUS system rollout costs of approximately $7.5 million in 2015 and $3.7 million in 2014. See the “FOCUS System” section above for additional information. Changes in income before income taxes for 2015 in comparison to 2014 are summarized on a segment basis as follows: • Domestic Company-owned Restaurants Segment. Domestic Company-owned restaurants income before income taxes increased $15.5 million primarily due to higher profits from the 5.9% increase in comparable sales and lower commodity costs. These increases were partially offset by higher depreciation expense of $1.1 million associated with FOCUS equipment. The market price for cheese averaged $1.61 per pound in 2015, compared to $2.12 per pound in the prior year. • Domestic Commissaries Segment. Domestic commissaries’ income before income taxes increased $5.4 million primarily due to incremental profits from higher restaurant volumes and a higher margin, partially offset by incremental insurance expense from higher automobile claims costs of approximately $1.5 million. • • North America Franchising Segment. North America franchising income before income taxes increased $6.3 million primarily due to higher royalties from increases of 3.6% and 1.0% in comparable sales and equivalent units, respectively, and lower royalty incentives. International Segment. The international segment reported income before income taxes of approximately $10.9 million in 2015 compared to $7.3 million in 2014. The increase of $3.6 million was primarily due to an increase in units and comparable sales of 6.9%, which resulted in both higher royalties and an increase of approximately $2.4 million in United Kingdom results. Additionally, our Company-owned China results improved approximately $2.2 million (losses of approximately $1.2 million in 2015 and $3.4 million in 2014). The improvement in China Company-owned results was primarily due to lower non-operating costs of $1.5 million for impairment, disposition and depreciation. The international segment improvement was somewhat offset by the negative impact of foreign currency exchange rates of approximately $2.8 million. • All Others Segment. The “All others” reporting segment, which primarily includes our online and mobile ordering business and our wholly-owned print and promotions subsidiary, Preferred 36 Marketing Solutions, increased approximately $900,000 primarily due to lower infrastructure costs to support our digital ordering business. • Unallocated Corporate Expenses. Unallocated corporate expenses increased approximately $14.2 million, excluding the legal settlement expense, primarily due to higher salaries and benefits, including an increase in health insurance claims costs, as well as increased interest costs associated with higher levels of debt and a higher effective interest rate. In addition, management incentive compensation costs increased in 2015 due to higher annual operating results. Diluted earnings per common share were $1.89 in 2015 compared to $1.75 in 2014, or an increase of $0.14, or 8.0%. Diluted earnings per common share were $2.09 in 2015, excluding the $0.20 legal settlement, or an increase of $0.34, or 19.4%. Diluted earnings per common share increased $0.08 due to the 4.1% reduction in weighted average shares outstanding. Additionally, FOCUS system costs reduced diluted earnings per share by $0.13 in 2015 and $0.06 in 2014. Review of Consolidated Operating Results Revenues. Domestic Company-owned restaurant sales were $756.3 million for 2015 compared to $701.9 million for 2014. As previously noted, the 7.8% increase was primarily due to a 5.9% increase in comparable sales and a 2.7% increase in equivalent units. North America franchise royalties were $95.0 million for 2015, representing an increase of 6.3% over 2014 revenues of $89.4 million. This increase was primarily due to higher North America franchise sales and lower incentives. North America franchise sales increased 4.2% to $2.13 billion, from $2.04 billion in 2014, as domestic franchise comparable sales increased 3.6% and equivalent units increased 1.0%. North America franchise sales are not included in our consolidated statements of income; however, our North America franchise royalty revenue is derived from these sales. Average weekly sales for comparable units include restaurants that were open throughout the periods presented below. The comparable sales base for domestic Company-owned and North America franchised restaurants, respectively, includes restaurants acquired by the Company or divested to franchisees during the previous twelve months. Average weekly sales for non-comparable units include restaurants that were not open throughout the periods presented below and include non-traditional sites. Average weekly sales for non-traditional units not subject to continuous operation are calculated based upon actual days open. 37 The comparable sales base and average weekly sales for 2015 and 2014 for domestic Company-owned and North America franchised restaurants consisted of the following: Total domestic units (end of period) Equivalent units Comparable sales base units Comparable sales base percentage Average weekly sales - comparable units Average weekly sales - total non-comparable units* Average weekly sales - all units Year Ended December 27, 2015 Domestic Company- owned North America Franchised Year Ended December 28, 2014 North America Franchised Domestic Company- owned 707 684 667 97.5% 21,461 13,773 21,274 $ $ $ 2,681 2,546 2,351 92.3% 16,510 10,716 16,066 $ $ $ 686 666 646 97.0% 20,451 14,389 20,271 $ $ $ 2,654 2,521 2,307 91.5% 16,031 10,588 15,570 $ $ $ *Includes 129 traditional units in 2015 and 150 in 2014 and 228 non-traditional units in 2015 and 213 in 2014. North America franchise and development fees were approximately $1.0 million in 2015, an increase of approximately $300,000 from 2014 revenues, primarily due to higher franchise renewal fees. Domestic commissary sales decreased 2.2% to $615.6 million in 2015, from $629.5 million in the prior year. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in cheese prices, which was somewhat offset by an increase in sales volumes. Pricing for cheese is based on a fixed dollar markup; when cheese prices decrease, revenues will decrease with no overall impact on the related dollar margin. Other sales decreased $9.5 million to $64.7 million in 2015 primarily due to lower FOCUS equipment sales to franchisees. See the FOCUS System section above for additional information. International royalties and franchise and development fees increased approximately $1.6 million primarily due to a 14.6% increase in franchised units and a comparable sales increase of 7.3%, calculated on a constant dollar basis. The negative impact of foreign currency exchange rates reduced our revenues by approximately $2.7 million. International franchise sales were $592.7 million in 2015, compared to $553.0 million in 2014. International franchise sales are not included in our consolidated statements of income; however, our international royalty revenue is derived from these sales. International restaurant and commissary sales increased approximately $700,000, or 0.9%, primarily due to an increase in commissary revenues from increases in units and higher comparable sales. The increase was partially offset by lower sales at China Company-owned restaurants due to the disposition of eleven restaurants in 2014 and negative comparable sales. Additionally, sales were negatively impacted $4.8 million by foreign currency exchange rates. Costs and Expenses. The restaurant operating margin at domestic Company-owned units was 20.1% in 2015, compared to 18.5% in 2014 with the following differences by income statement category: • Cost of sales was 1.3% lower as a percentage of revenues in 2015 primarily due to lower commodity costs, primarily cheese. • Salaries and benefits were 0.7% higher as a percentage of sales in 2015, primarily due to higher performance-based bonuses paid to general managers and minimum wage increases. • Advertising and related costs as a percentage of revenues were 0.2% lower as a percentage of sales in 2015 primarily due to the benefit of higher sales. 38 • Occupancy costs and other restaurant operating costs, on a combined basis, were 0.8% lower as a percentage of revenues in 2015 primarily due to the benefit of higher sales and lower mileage reimbursement due to lower gas prices. Domestic commissary operating margin was 7.6% and 7.1% in 2015 and 2014, respectively, with the following differences by income statement category: • Cost of sales was 1.7% lower as a percentage of revenues in 2015 primarily due to lower cheese costs, which have a fixed-dollar markup. As cheese prices are lower, food cost as a percentage of sales is lower. • Salaries and benefits and other commissary operating expenses were 1.1% higher as a percentage of sales due to incremental automobile insurance claims costs of $1.5 million and due to higher labor costs, including in house distribution. Additionally, commissary revenues are lower due to lower cheese prices, which increase overall salaries and benefits and other commissary operating expenses as a percentage of sales. Other operating expenses as a percentage of other sales were 94.1% in 2015, compared to 95.8% in 2014. The lower operating expenses were primarily due to the decreasing number of franchise FOCUS systems sales. FOCUS sales had very high operating expenses and a minimal margin. International restaurant and commissary expenses were 82.0% in 2015 compared to 83.0% in 2014, as a percentage of total restaurant and commissary sales. The decrease of 1.0% is primarily due to the benefit of higher commissary sales volumes. General and administrative (“G&A”) expenses were $157.4 million, or 9.6% of revenues for 2015, as compared to $140.6 million, or 8.8% of revenues for 2014. The increase of $16.9 million was primarily due to the following: • Corporate G&A costs increased primarily due to increases in salaries and benefits, including an increase in health insurance claim costs, and management incentive compensation costs due to higher annual operating results. • Domestic Company-owned restaurant supervisor bonuses increased due to higher sales and • higher operating profits. International G&A costs increased primarily due to incremental advertising spending and other international support costs. Other general expenses decreased $2.0 million to $6.2 million in 2015, from $8.2 million in 2014. The decrease was primarily due to lower provisions for uncollectible accounts and notes receivable and lower disposition and valuation related losses. The 2014 year included $1.0 million of these charges for eleven Company-owned restaurants in China. Depreciation and amortization was $40.3 million, or 2.5% of revenues for 2015, as compared to $40.0 million, or 2.5% of revenues for 2014. Net interest expense. Net interest expense increased approximately $1.5 million primarily due to a higher average outstanding debt balance and a higher effective interest rate. Income Tax Expense. Our effective income tax rate was 31.2% in 2015 compared to 32.0% in 2014. The 2015 rate includes higher benefits from various tax deductions and credits including the U.S. federal manufacturing deduction. See “Note 15” of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for additional information. 39 2014 Compared to 2013 Discussion of Revenues. Consolidated revenues increased $159.1 million, or 11.1%, to $1.60 billion in 2014, compared to $1.44 billion in 2013. Revenues are summarized in the following table on a reporting segment basis. (In thousands) North America Revenues: Domestic Company-owned restaurant sales Franchise royalties Franchise and development fees Domestic commissary sales Other sales International Revenues: Royalties and franchise and development fees Restaurant and commissary sales Total Revenues Year Ended Dec. 28, 2014 Dec. 29, 2013 Increase (decrease) $ Increase (decrease) % $ 701,854 89,443 726 629,492 74,179 $ 635,317 81,692 1,181 578,870 53,322 $ 66,537 7,751 (455) 50,622 20,857 25,730 76,725 1,598,149 $ 21,979 66,661 1,439,022 $ 3,751 10,064 159,127 $ 10.5% 9.5% -38.5% 8.7% 39.1% 17.1% 15.1% 11.1% The increase in revenues in 2014 compared to 2013 was primarily due to the following: • Domestic Company-owned restaurant sales increased $66.5 million, or 10.5% primarily due to an 8.2% increase in comparable sales and a 2.6% increase in equivalent units. • North America franchise royalty revenue increased $7.8 million, or 9.5% primarily due to a 6.2% increase in comparable sales and a reduced level of performance-based royalty incentives. • Domestic commissary sales increased $50.6 million, or 8.7%, primarily due to increases in the prices of certain commodities (primarily cheese and meats), higher sales volumes, and higher overall margins. • Other sales increased $20.9 million, or 39.1%, primarily due to FOCUS equipment sales to • • franchisees. See the FOCUS System section above for additional information. International royalties and franchise and development fees increased $3.8 million or 17.1% primarily due to an increase in the number of restaurants and a 7.8% increase in comparable sales, calculated on a constant dollar basis. International restaurant and commissary sales increased $10.1 million, or 15.1%, primarily due to an increase in commissary revenues, particularly in the United Kingdom, with increases in units and higher comparable sales. This was somewhat offset by the 2013 year including an additional month of revenues at our China Company-owned operations as we changed the reporting cycle in the fourth quarter of 2013 to no longer consolidate the results one month in arrears. The impact of this change resulted in incremental revenues of $2.1 million in 2013. 40 Discussion of Operating Results Our income before income taxes totaled $114.3 million in 2014, as compared to $106.1 million in 2013, an increase of approximately $8.1 million. Income before income taxes is summarized in the following table on a reporting segment basis: (In thousands) Domestic Company-owned restaurants Domestic commissaries North America franchising International All others Unallocated corporate expenses Elimination of intersegment profits Total income before income taxes (a) Year Ended Dec. 28, 2014 Dec. 29, 2013 Increase (Decrease) $ $ $ 40,969 39,317 77,009 7,250 (9) (49,440) (841) 114,255 34,590 37,804 70,201 2,803 3,490 (41,025) (1,754) 106,109 6,379 1,513 6,808 4,447 (3,499) (8,415) 913 8,146 $ $ $ (a) Includes FOCUS system rollout costs of approximately $3.7 million in 2014. See the FOCUS System section above for additional information. Changes in income before income taxes for 2014 in comparison to 2013 are summarized on a segment basis as follows: • Domestic Company-owned Restaurant Segment. Domestic Company-owned restaurants’ income before income taxes increased $6.4 million due to the 8.2% increase in comparable sales, partially offset by higher commodities and higher automobile insurance claims costs of approximately $3.5 million. Additionally, 2014 includes depreciation expense of approximately $1.2 million associated with FOCUS equipment costs. • Domestic Commissaries Segment. Domestic commissaries’ income before income taxes increased $1.5 million primarily due to higher margins and higher sales volumes, which were somewhat offset by higher workers’ compensation and automobile insurance claims costs of approximately $2.6 million and higher costs associated with various ongoing commissary initiatives. • • North America Franchising Segment. North America franchising income before income taxes increased approximately $6.8 million in 2014 due to the previously mentioned royalty revenue increase. International Segment. The international segment reported income before income taxes of approximately $7.3 million in 2014 compared to $2.8 million in 2013. The increase of $4.4 million was primarily due to an increase in units and comparable sales of 7.4%, which resulted in both higher royalties and contributed to an improvement of $3.1 million in the United Kingdom results. The increases were partially offset by unfavorable China Company-owned results of approximately $700,000 (losses of approximately $3.4 million in 2014 and $2.7 million in 2013). The unfavorable results were primarily due to restaurant disposition costs for 11 restaurants, which were approximately $700,000 higher in 2014. Additionally, the 2013 China results included $215,000 of incremental losses associated with the additional month of operations in the fourth quarter of 2013. • All Others Segment. The “All others” segment, which primarily includes our online and mobile ordering business and our wholly-owned print and promotions subsidiary, Preferred Marketing Solutions, decreased approximately $3.5 million. The decrease was primarily due to higher infrastructure costs to support our digital ordering business and a lower margin at our print and 41 promotions business, primarily associated with an increased number of discounted direct mail campaigns in comparison to 2013. • Unallocated Corporate Expenses. Unallocated corporate expenses increased approximately $8.4 million due to the following: (1) Higher G&A costs of approximately $3.8 million, including legal and management incentive compensation costs, partially offset by lower travel costs. (2) An increase in net interest expense of approximately $3.0 million primarily due to a higher average outstanding debt balance with a higher effective interest rate. Additionally, 2013 included an approximate $1.1 million benefit from a decrease in the redemption value of a mandatorily redeemable noncontrolling interest in a joint venture. An amendment in the joint venture agreement during 2014 no longer requires changes in the value to be recorded in net interest. (3) FOCUS costs of approximately $1.6 million in 2014, including depreciation expense for capitalized FOCUS software development costs and other costs to support the rollout of the program. Diluted earnings per common share were $1.75 in 2014, compared to $1.55 in 2013, an increase of $0.20, or 12.9%. Diluted earnings per common share increased $0.10 due to the 5.7% reduction in weighted average shares outstanding. Additionally, FOCUS system costs reduced diluted earnings per share by $0.06 in 2014. Review of Consolidated Operating Results Revenues. Domestic Company-owned restaurant sales were $701.9 million for 2014 compared to $635.3 million for 2013. As previously noted, the 10.5% increase was primarily due to an 8.2% increase in comparable sales and a 2.6% increase in equivalent units. North America franchise sales increased 7.1% to $2.04 billion in 2014, from $1.91 billion in 2013, as domestic franchise comparable sales increased 6.2% and equivalent units increased 1.2%. North America franchise sales are not included in our consolidated statements of income; however, our North America franchise royalty revenue is derived from these sales. North America franchise royalties were $89.4 million for 2014, representing an increase of 9.5% from 2013. As previously noted, this increase is due to the franchise comparable sales increase and a reduction in performance-based royalty incentives. 42 The comparable sales base and average weekly sales for 2014 and 2013 for domestic Company-owned and North America franchised restaurants consisted of the following: Total domestic units (end of period) Equivalent units Comparable sales base units Comparable sales base percentage Average weekly sales - comparable units Average weekly sales - total non-comparable units* Average weekly sales - all units Year Ended December 28, 2014 Domestic Company- owned North America Franchised Year Ended December 29, 2013 North America Franchised Domestic Company- owned 686 666 646 97.0% 20,451 14,389 20,271 $ $ $ 2,654 2,521 2,307 91.5% 16,031 10,588 15,570 $ $ $ 665 649 633 97.5% 18,995 12,167 18,832 $ $ $ 2,621 2,492 2,263 90.8% 15,171 10,092 14,704 $ $ $ *Includes 150 traditional units in 2014 and 185 in 2013 and 213 non-traditional units in 2014 and 184 in 2013. North America franchise and development fees were approximately $700,000 in 2014, a decrease of approximately $500,000 from 2013 primarily due to lower franchise renewal fees. Domestic commissary sales increased 8.7% to $629.5 million in 2014, from $578.9 million in the prior year. As previously discussed, the increase was primarily due to increases in the prices of certain commodities (primarily cheese and meats), higher sales volumes and higher overall margins. Our commissaries charge a fixed dollar mark-up on the cost of cheese. Cheese prices are based upon the block price, which increased to an average of $2.12 per pound in 2014 from $1.76 per pound in 2013. Other sales increased $20.9 million to $74.2 million in 2014 primarily due to FOCUS equipment sales to franchisees. See the FOCUS System section above for additional information. International royalties and franchise and development fees increased approximately $3.8 million in 2014 primarily due to a 17.5% increase in franchised units and a comparable sales increase of 7.8%, calculated on a constant dollar basis. International franchise restaurant sales were $553.0 million in 2014, compared to $460.0 million in 2013. International franchise restaurant sales are not included in our consolidated statements of income; however, our international royalty revenue is derived from these sales. International restaurant and commissary sales increased $10.1 million, or 15.1%, in 2014 primarily due to an increase in commissary revenues from increases in units and higher comparable sales, including the United Kingdom. As previously noted, the 2013 year includes an additional month of revenues at our China Company-owned operations in the amount of $2.1 million. Costs and Expenses. The restaurant operating margin at domestic Company-owned units was 18.5% in both 2014 and 2013 with the following differences by income statement category: • Cost of sales was 0.4% higher as a percentage of revenues in 2014 primarily due to higher commodity costs, primarily cheese and meats, somewhat offset by a higher ticket average. • Salaries and benefits were 0.4% lower as a percentage of sales in 2014, primarily due to the benefit of higher sales. • Advertising and related costs as a percentage of revenues were 0.3% lower as a percentage of sales in 2014, primarily due to the benefit of higher sales. 43 • Occupancy costs and other restaurant operating costs, on a combined basis, were 0.3% higher as a percentage of revenues in 2014 primarily due to higher restaurant driver insurance claims costs of approximately $3.5 million. Domestic commissary operating margin was 7.1% and 7.7% in 2014 and 2013, respectively, with the following differences by income statement category: • Cost of sales was 0.8% higher as a percentage of revenues in 2014 primarily due to higher cheese costs, which have a fixed-dollar markup. As cheese prices are higher, food cost as a percentage of sales is higher. • Salaries and benefits and other commissary operating expenses were 0.2% lower as a percentage of sales due to the benefit of higher sales. The costs were $6.3 million higher in 2014 primarily due to higher sales volumes, higher workers’ compensation and automobile insurance claims costs of $2.6 million and higher costs associated with various ongoing commissary initiatives. Other operating expenses as a percentage of other sales were 95.8% in 2014, compared to 90.0% in 2013. The higher operating expenses were primarily due to the low margin associated with sales of FOCUS equipment to franchisees, higher infrastructure costs to support our online operations and the impact of an increased number of reduced cost direct mail campaigns offered to our domestic franchised restaurants by Preferred. International restaurant and commissary expenses were 83.0% in 2014 compared to 84.9% in 2013, as a percentage of total restaurant and commissary sales. The decrease of 1.9% was primarily due to lower operating expenses for the United Kingdom primarily due to higher sales. General and administrative (“G&A”) expenses were $140.6 million, or 8.8% of revenues for 2014, as compared to $134.2 million, or 9.3% of revenues for 2013. The decrease as a percentage of sales was primarily the result of higher sales. The increase of $6.3 million was primarily due to the following: • Unallocated corporate G&A expenses increased primarily due to higher legal and management incentive compensation costs, partially offset by lower travel costs. • Domestic Company-owned restaurant supervisor expenses increased, including higher bonuses • from higher profits. International G&A costs were higher due to increased infrastructure, marketing and other support costs. Other general expenses reflect net expense of $8.2 million in 2014, as compared to $6.7 million in 2013. The increase of approximately $1.6 million was primarily due to $1.1 million of higher disposition related costs, including $700,000 for China Company-owned restaurant closures and divestitures, and higher provisions for uncollectible accounts and notes receivable of approximately $500,000. Depreciation and amortization was $40.0 million, or 2.5% of revenues for 2014, as compared to $35.1 million, or 2.4% of revenues for 2013. The increase of $4.9 million is primarily due to incremental depreciation related to both our New Jersey commissary dough production capital expenditures and our FOCUS capitalized software costs and equipment costs at Company-owned restaurants. 44 Net interest expense. Net interest expense consisted of the following (in thousands): Interest expense on long-term debt (a) Investment income Change in redemption value of mandatorily redeemable noncontrolling interest in a joint venture (b) Net interest (expense) income Dec. 28, 2014 Year Ended Dec. 29, 2013 (Increase) Decrease $ (4,073) 702 $ (2,131) 589 $ (1,942) 113 (4) (3,375) $ 1,148 (394) $ (1,152) (2,981) $ (a) The increase in interest expense was due to a higher average outstanding debt balance and a higher effective interest rate. (b) 2013 represents the change in redemption value based on the mandatory redemption feature we previously had for this noncontrolling interest. We eliminated that feature in 2014. Income Tax Expense. Our effective income tax rate was 32.0% in 2014 compared to 31.2% in 2013. The higher tax rate in 2014 was primarily due to the prior year including favorable state tax settlements. See “Note 15” of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for additional information. Liquidity and Capital Resources Debt Our debt is comprised entirely of an unsecured revolving credit facility with outstanding balances of $256.0 million as of December 27, 2015 and $230.5 million as of December 28, 2014. The increase in the outstanding balance was primarily due to borrowings to fund share repurchases and to pay dividends. The interest rate charged on outstanding balances is LIBOR plus 75 to 175 basis points. The commitment fee on the unused balance ranges from 15 to 25 basis points. The increment over LIBOR and the commitment fee are determined quarterly based upon the ratio of total indebtedness to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”), as defined by the Credit Facility. The remaining availability under the Credit Facility, reduced for outstanding letters of credit, was approximately $120.2 million as of December 27, 2015. We use interest rate swaps to hedge against the effects of potential interest rate increases on borrowings under our Credit Facility. As of December 27, 2015, we have the following interest rate swap agreements, including three forward starting swaps for $125.0 million that become effective in 2018 upon expiration of the two existing swaps for $125.0 million: Effective Dates Debt Amount Fixed Rates July 30, 2013 through April 30, 2018 $75 million December 30, 2014 through April 30, 2018 $50 million April 30, 2018 through April 30, 2023 April 30, 2018 through April 30, 2023 April 30, 2018 through April 30, 2023 $55 million $35 million $35 million 45 1.42% 1.36% 2.33% 2.36% 2.34% Our Credit Facility contains affirmative and negative covenants, including the following financial covenants, as defined by the credit facility: Permitted Ratio Actual Ratio for the Year Ended December 27, 2015 Leverage Ratio Not to exceed 3.0 to 1.0 Interest Coverage Ratio Not less than 3.5 to 1.0 1.6 to 1.0 4.8 to 1.0 Our leverage ratio is defined as outstanding debt divided by consolidated EBITDA for the most recent four fiscal quarters. Our interest coverage ratio is defined as the sum of consolidated EBITDA and consolidated rental expense for the most recent four fiscal quarters divided by the sum of consolidated interest expense and consolidated rental expense for the most recent four fiscal quarters. We were in compliance with all covenants as of December 27, 2015. Cash Flows Cash flow provided by operating activities was $160.3 million for 2015 as compared to $122.6 million in 2014. The increase of approximately $37.7 million was primarily due to higher operating income and favorable changes in inventory and other working capital items. The prior year included higher inventory levels of equipment to support the rollout of FOCUS to our domestic franchised restaurants. The Perrin legal settlement does not impact 2015 cash provided by operating activities as it was not paid until January 2016. Cash flow provided by operating activities increased to $122.6 million in 2014 from $101.4 million in 2013, primarily due to higher operating income and favorable changes in working capital. The Company’s free cash flow for the last three years was as follows (in thousands): Dec. 27, 2015 Year Ended Dec. 28, 2014 Dec. 29, 2013 Net cash provided by operating activities Purchase of property and equipment (a) Free cash flow (b) $ $ 160,312 (38,972) 121,340 $ 122,632 (48,655) 73,977 $ $ 101,360 (50,750) 50,610 $ (a) We require capital primarily for the development, acquisition, renovation and maintenance of restaurants, the development, renovation and maintenance of commissary facilities and equipment and the enhancement of corporate systems and facilities, including technological enhancements such as our FOCUS system. (b) We define free cash flow as net cash provided by operating activities (from the consolidated statements of cash flows) less the purchases of property and equipment. See “Items Impacting Comparability; Non-GAAP Measures” for more information about this non-GAAP measure, its limitations and why we present free cash flow alongside the most directly comparable GAAP measure. 46 We require capital for share repurchases and the payment of cash dividends. The following is a summary of our common share repurchases, as adjusted for the stock split, for the last three years (in thousands, except average price per share): Fiscal Year 2013 2014 2015 Number of Shares Repurchased 3,538 2,562 1,845 Total Cash Paid $118,569 $117,400 $119,793 Average Price Per Share $33.51 $45.82 $64.93 Subsequent to December 27, 2015, we acquired an additional 860,000 shares at an aggregate cost of $42.6 million. Approximately $167.1 million remained available through February 28, 2017 under the Company’s share repurchase program as of February 16, 2016. We paid cash dividends of $24.8 million in 2015 ($0.63 per share), $21.7 million in 2014 ($0.53 per share) and $10.8 million in 2013 ($0.25 per share). Additionally, on January 27, 2016, our Board of Directors declared a first quarter 2016 cash dividend of $0.175 per share, or approximately $6.6 million. The dividend was paid on February 19, 2016 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on February 8, 2016. The declaration and payment of any future dividends will be at the discretion of the Board of Directors, subject to the Company’s financial results, cash requirements, and other factors deemed relevant by the Board of Directors. Contractual Obligations Contractual obligations and payments as of December 27, 2015 due by year are as follows (in thousands): Payments Due by Period Less than 1 Year 1-3 Years 3-5 Years After 5 Years Total Contractual Obligations: Revolving credit facility (1) Interest payments (2) Total debt Operating leases (3) Total contractual obligations $ - 5,497 5,497 41,710 47,207 $ - $ 11,785 11,785 69,825 81,610 $ $ $ 256,000 13,367 269,367 42,213 311,580 - $ 15,594 15,594 54,532 70,126 $ $ $ 256,000 46,243 302,243 208,280 510,523 (1) We utilize interest rate swaps to hedge against $125 million of our variable rate debt. At December 27, 2015, we had an interest rate swap liability recorded in other current and other long-term liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet. (2) Interest payments assume an outstanding debt balance of $256 million until the expiration of the swaps. Interest payments are calculated based on LIBOR plus the applicable margin in effect at December 27, 2015, and considers the interest rate swap agreements in effect. The actual interest rates on our variable rate debt and the amount of our indebtedness could vary from those used to compute the above interest payments. See “Note 9” of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for additional information concerning our debt and credit arrangements. (3) See “Note 17” of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for additional information. 47 The above table does not include the following: • Unrecognized tax benefits of $3.7 million since we are not able to make reasonable estimates of the period of cash settlement with respect to the taxing authority. • Redeemable noncontrolling interests of $8.4 million as we are not able to predict the timing of the redemptions. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements The off-balance sheet arrangements that are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on the Company’s financial condition are operating leases of Company-owned restaurant sites, QC Centers, office space and transportation equipment. We have certain other commercial commitments where payment is contingent upon the occurrence of certain events. Such commitments include the following by year (in thousands): Amount of Commitment Expiration Per Period 3-5 Years After 5 Years 1-3 Years Less than 1 Year Total Other Commercial Commitments: Standby letters of credit $ 23,770 $ - $ - $ - $ 23,770 We are party to standby letters of credit with off-balance sheet risk associated with our insurance programs. See “Notes 9, 12 and 17” of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for additional information related to contractual and other commitments. Forward-Looking Statements Certain matters discussed in this report, including information within Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Generally, the use of words such as “expect,” “estimate,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “will,” “forecast,” “plan,” “project,” or similar words identify forward-looking statements that we intend to be included within the safe harbor protections provided by the federal securities laws. Such forward-looking statements may relate to projections or guidance concerning business performance, revenue, earnings, contingent liabilities, resolution of litigation, commodity costs, profit margins, unit growth, capital expenditures, and other financial and operational measures. Such statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions, which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond our control. Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from those matters expressed or implied in such forward- looking statements. The risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are involved in our forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to: • • aggressive changes in pricing or other marketing or promotional strategies by competitors, which may adversely affect sales and profitability; and new product and concept developments by food industry competitors; changes in consumer preferences or consumer buying habits, including changes in general economic conditions or other factors that may affect consumer confidence and discretionary spending; 48 • • • • • the adverse impact on the Company or our results caused by product recalls, food quality or safety issues, incidences of foodborne illness, food contamination and other general public health concerns about our Company-owned or franchised restaurants or others in the restaurant industry; failure to maintain our brand strength, quality reputation and consumer enthusiasm for our better ingredients marketing and advertising strategy; the ability of the Company and its franchisees to meet planned growth targets and operate new and existing restaurants profitably, including difficulties finding qualified franchisees, store level employees or suitable sites; increases in food costs or sustained higher other operating costs. This could include increased employee compensation, benefits, insurance, tax rates, new regulatory requirements or increasing compliance costs; increases in insurance claims and related costs for programs funded by the Company up to certain retention limits, including medical, owned and non-owned automobiles, workers’ compensation, general liability and property; • • disruption of our supply chain or commissary operations which could be caused by our sole source of supply of cheese or limited source of suppliers for other key ingredients or more generally due to weather, natural disasters including drought, disease, geopolitical or other disruptions beyond our control; increased risks associated with our international operations, including economic and political conditions, instability in our international markets, especially emerging markets, fluctuations in currency exchange rates, and difficulty in meeting planned sales targets and new store growth; the impact of current or future claims and litigation, including labor and employment-related claims; current or proposed legislation impacting our business; failure to effectively execute succession planning, and our reliance on the multiple roles of our founder, chairman and chief executive officer, who also serves as our brand spokesperson; and • disruption of critical business or information technology systems, or those of our suppliers, and risks associated with systems failures and data privacy and security breaches, including theft of confidential Company, employee and customer information, including payment cards. • • • These and other risk factors are discussed in detail in “Part I. Item 1A. – Risk Factors” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We undertake no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of future events, new information or otherwise, except as required by law. Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk Interest Rate Risk Our debt is comprised entirely of a $400 million unsecured revolving credit facility with outstanding balances of $256.0 million as of December 27, 2015 and $230.5 million as of December 28, 2014 and a maturity date of October 31, 2019. Additionally, we have the option to increase the amount available under our revolving credit facility by an additional $100 million. The interest rate charged on the outstanding balances is LIBOR plus 75 to 175 basis points. The commitment fee on the unused balance ranges from 15 to 25 basis points. We attempt to minimize interest risk exposure by fixing our rate through the utilization of interest rate swaps, which are derivative financial instruments. Our swaps are entered into with financial institutions and have reset dates and critical terms that match those of our existing debt and the anticipated critical terms of future debt. By using a derivative instrument to hedge exposures to changes in interest rates, we expose ourselves to credit risk. Credit risk is the failure of the counterparty to perform under the terms of the derivative contract. 49 As of December 27, 2015, we have the following interest rate swap agreements, including three forward starting swaps executed in 2015 that become effective in 2018 upon expiration of the two existing swaps for $125 million: Effective Dates Debt Amount Fixed Rates July 30, 2013 through April 30, 2018 $75 million December 30, 2014 through April 30, 2018 $50 million April 30, 2018 through April 30, 2023 April 30, 2018 through April 30, 2023 April 30, 2018 through April 30, 2023 $55 million $35 million $35 million 1.42% 1.36% 2.33% 2.36% 2.34% The weighted average interest rate on the revolving line of credit, including the impact of the interest rate swap agreements, was 2.0% for the year ended December 27, 2015. An increase in the present interest rate of 100 basis points on the line of credit balance outstanding as of December 27, 2015, including the impact of the interest rate swaps, would increase annual interest expense by $1.3 million. Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk We are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations from our operations outside of the United States, which can adversely impact our revenues, net income and cash flows. Our international operations principally consist of Company-owned restaurants in China and distribution sales to franchised Papa John’s restaurants located in the United Kingdom, Mexico and China and our franchise sales and support activities, which derive revenues from sales of franchise and development rights and the collection of royalties from our international franchisees. Approximately 6.4% of our revenues for 2015 and 2014 and 6.2% for 2013 were derived from these operations. We have not historically hedged our exposure to foreign currency fluctuations. Foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations had a negative impact on our revenues of $7.5 million in 2015 and a negative impact on our income before income taxes of $2.8 million in 2015. An additional 10% adverse change in the foreign currency rates for our international markets would result in an additional negative impact on annual revenue and income before income taxes of approximately $9.0 million and $2.0 million, respectively. Commodity Price Risk In the ordinary course of business, the food and paper products we purchase, including cheese (our largest food cost), are subject to seasonal fluctuations, weather, availability, demand and other factors that are beyond our control. We have pricing agreements with some of our vendors, including forward pricing agreements for a portion of our cheese purchases for our domestic Company-owned restaurants, which are accounted for as normal purchases; however, we still remain exposed to on-going commodity volatility. 50 The following table presents the actual average block price for cheese by quarter in 2015, 2014 and 2013. Also presented is the projected 2016 average block price by quarter (based on the February 16, 2016 Chicago Mercantile Exchange cheese futures prices for 2016): 2016 Projected Market 2015 Block Price 2014 Block Price 2013 Block Price $ $ $ $ Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4 Full Year 1.510 1.551 1.657 1.698 1.604 1.538 1.630 1.684 1.602 1.614 2.212 2.131 2.141 1.991 2.119 $ $ $ $ 1.662 1.784 1.740 1.849 1.759 51 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Papa John’s International, Inc. and Subsidiaries We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Papa John’s International, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 27, 2015 and December 28, 2014, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 27, 2015. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a)(2). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Papa John’s International, Inc. and Subsidiaries at December 27, 2015 and December 28, 2014, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 27, 2015, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Papa John’s International, Inc. and Subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 27, 2015, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework) and our report dated February 23, 2016, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon. /s/ Ernst & Young LLP Louisville, Kentucky February 23, 2016 52 Papa John’s International, Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Statements of Income (In thousands, except per share amounts) North America revenues: Domestic Company-owned restaurant sales Franchise royalties Franchise and development fees Domestic commissary sales Other sales International revenues: Royalties and franchise and development fees Restaurant and commissary sales Total revenues Costs and expenses: Domestic Company-owned restaurant expenses: Cost of sales Salaries and benefits Advertising and related costs Occupancy costs and other restaurant operating expenses Total domestic Company-owned restaurant expenses Domestic commissary expenses: Cost of sales Salaries and benefits and other commissary operating expenses Total domestic commissary expenses Other operating expenses International restaurant and commissary expenses General and administrative expenses Other general expenses Depreciation and amortization Total costs and expenses Operating income Legal settlement expense Investment income Interest expense Income before income taxes Income tax expense Net income before attribution to noncontrolling interests Income attributable to noncontrolling interests Net income attributable to the Company Calculation of income for earnings per share: Net income attributable to the Company December 27, 2015 Years Ended December 28, 2014 December 29, 2013 $ 756,307 95,046 1,010 615,610 64,711 $ 701,854 89,443 726 629,492 74,179 $ 635,317 81,692 1,181 578,870 53,322 27,289 77,402 1,637,375 25,730 76,725 1,598,149 21,979 66,661 1,439,022 178,952 207,998 67,164 150,092 604,206 175,733 188,234 63,463 144,628 572,058 156,237 173,316 59,172 128,826 517,551 471,812 96,715 568,527 60,896 63,506 157,421 6,205 40,307 1,501,068 136,307 (12,278) 794 (5,676) 119,147 37,183 81,964 (6,282) 75,682 $ 492,940 91,981 584,921 71,068 63,718 140,566 8,223 39,965 1,480,519 117,630 - 702 (4,077) 114,255 36,558 77,697 (4,382) 73,315 $ 448,693 85,649 534,342 48,011 56,609 134,228 6,673 35,105 1,332,519 106,503 - 589 (983) 106,109 33,130 72,979 (3,442) 69,537 $ $ 75,682 $ 73,315 $ 69,537 Decrease (increase) in noncontrolling interest redemption value 65 (44) (510) Net income attributable to participating securities Net income attributable to common shareholders (325) 75,422 $ (402) 72,869 $ (530) 68,497 $ Basic earnings per common share Diluted earnings per common share Basic weighted average common shares outstanding Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding $ $ 1.91 1.89 $ $ 1.78 1.75 $ $ 1.58 1.55 39,458 40,000 40,960 41,718 43,387 44,243 Dividends declared per common share $ 0.63 $ 0.53 $ 0.25 Supplemental data (see Note 16): Revenues - affiliates See accompanying notes. $ 3,124 $ 3,546 $ 3,259 53 Papa John's International, Inc. and S ubsidiaries Consolidated S tatements of Comprehensive Income (In thousands) Years Ended December 27, December 28, December 29, 2014 2013 2015 Net income before attribution to noncontrolling interests Other comprehensive income (loss), before tax: Foreign currency translation adjustments Interest rate swaps (1) Other comprehensive income (loss), before tax Income tax effect: Foreign currency translation adjustments Interest rate swaps (2) Income tax effect Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax Comprehensive income before attribution to noncontrolling interests Comprehensive loss, redeemable noncontrolling interests Comprehensive (loss) income, nonredeemable noncontrolling interests Comprehensive income attributable to the Company $ 81,964 $ 77,697 $ 72,979 (2,133) (1,846) (3,979) (2,584) (261) (2,845) 1,065 (51) 1,014 789 683 1,472 (2,507) 79,457 (3,873) (2,409) 73,175 $ 956 97 1,053 (1,792) 75,905 (3,687) (695) 71,523 $ (394) 19 (375) 639 73,618 (3,466) 24 70,176 $ (1) Amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) into interest expense included $1,563, $996 and $501 for the years ended December 27, 2015, December 28, 2014 and December 29, 2013, respectively. (2) The income tax effects of amounts reclassified out of AOCI into interest expense were $578, $369 and $185 for the years ended December 27, 2015, December 28, 2014 and December 29, 2013, respectively. See accompanying notes. 54 Papa John’s International, Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Balance Sheets (In thousands, except per share amounts) Assets Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents Accounts receivable (less allowance for doubtful accounts of $2,447 in 2015 and $3,814 in 2014) Accounts receivable - affiliates (no allowance for doubtful accounts in 2015 and 2014) Notes receivable (no allowance for doubtful accounts in 2015 and 2014) Income taxes receivable Inventories Prepaid expenses Other current assets Assets held for sale Total current assets Net property and equipment Notes receivable, less current portion (less allowance for doubtful accounts of $3,653 in 2015 and $3,132 in 2014) Goodwill Deferred income taxes Other assets Total assets Liabilities and stockholders’ equity Current liabilities: Accounts payable Income and other taxes payable Accrued expenses and other current liabilities Total current liabilities Deferred revenue Long-term debt Deferred income taxes Other long-term liabilities Total liabilities Redeemable noncontrolling interests Stockholders’ equity: Years Ended December 27, 2015 December 28, 2014 $ 21,006 $ 20,122 63,163 55,933 157 7,816 272 21,564 20,372 8,941 9,299 152,590 214,044 114 6,106 9,527 27,394 18,736 9,828 - 147,760 219,457 11,105 79,657 2,415 35,101 494,912 $ 12,801 82,007 3,914 38,616 504,555 $ $ 43,492 8,527 80,918 132,937 3,190 256,000 4,610 47,606 444,343 $ 38,832 9,637 58,293 106,762 4,257 230,451 13,940 41,875 397,285 8,363 8,555 Preferred stock ($0.01 par value per share; no shares issued) Common stock ($0.01 par value per share; issued 43,731 in 2015 and 43,331 in 2014) Additional paid-in capital Accumulated other comprehensive income Retained earnings Treasury stock (5,308 shares in 2015 and 3,549 shares in 2014, at cost) Total stockholders' equity, net of noncontrolling interests Noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries Total stockholders' equity Total liabilities, redeemable noncontrolling interests and stockholders' equity - 437 158,348 (1,836) 143,789 (271,557) 29,181 13,025 42,206 494,912 $ - 433 147,912 671 92,876 (155,659) 86,233 12,482 98,715 504,555 $ See accompanying notes. 55 Papa John’s International, Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (In thousands) Balance at December 30, 2012 Net income attributable to the Company (1) Other comprehensive income Cash dividends paid Exercise of stock options Tax effect of equity awards Acquisition of Company common stock Retirement of Company common stock Stock-based compensation expense Issuance of restricted stock Change in redemption value of noncontrolling interests Reclassification from temporary equity to permanent equity Contributions from noncontrolling interests Other Balance at December 29, 2013 Net income attributable to the Company (1) Other comprehensive loss Cash dividends paid Exercise of stock options Tax effect of equity awards Acquisition of Company common stock Stock-based compensation expense Issuance of restricted stock Change in redemption value of noncontrolling interests Reclassification from temporary equity to permanent equity Contributions from noncontrolling interests Distributions to noncontrolling interests Other Balance at December 28, 2014 Net income attributable to the Company (1) Other comprehensive loss Cash dividends paid Exercise of stock options Tax effect of equity awards Acquisition of Company common stock Stock-based compensation expense Issuance of restricted stock Change in redemption value of noncontrolling interests Contributions from noncontrolling interests Distributions to noncontrolling interests Other Balance at December 27, 2015 Common Stock Shares Outstanding 44,482 - - - 570 - (3,536) - - 138 Common Stock 742 $ - - - 6 - - (320) - - Papa John's International, Inc. Additional Paid-In Capital Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) $ 280,534 - - 41 6,859 1,172 - (156,380) 7,409 (2,187) $ 1,824 - 639 - - - - - - - Retained Earnings Treasury Stock $ 356,461 69,537 - (10,751) - - - (373,440) - - $ (458,047) - - - - - (118,569) 530,140 - 2,187 Noncontrolling Interests in Subsidiaries - $ (24) - - - - - - - - Total Stockholders’ Equity $ 181,514 69,513 639 (10,710) 6,865 1,172 (118,569) - 7,409 - - - - 13 41,667 - - - 535 - (2,562) - 133 - - - - 9 39,782 - - - 320 - (1,845) - 151 - - - 15 38,423 - - - - 428 - - - 5 - - - - - - - - - 433 - - - 3 - - - 1 - - (510) - - - 104 137,552 - - 87 5,832 1,047 - 8,712 (5,443) - - - 2,463 - (1,792) - - - - - - - - - 41,297 73,315 - (21,692) - - - - - - - 223 (44,066) - - - - - (117,400) - 5,443 - - (44) - - - - 125 147,912 - - 100 5,194 (830) - 9,423 (3,232) - - - - 671 - (2,507) - - - - - - - - - - 92,876 75,682 - (24,834) - - - - - - - - 364 (155,659) - - - - - (119,793) - 3,231 - 434 100 - 510 695 - - - - - - - - 11,391 1,086 (1,200) - 12,482 2,409 - - - - - - - (510) 434 100 327 138,184 74,010 (1,792) (21,605) 5,837 1,047 (117,400) 8,712 - (44) 11,391 1,086 (1,200) 489 98,715 78,091 (2,507) (24,734) 5,197 (830) (119,793) 9,423 - - - - - $ 437 - - - (219) 158,348 $ - - - - (1,836) $ 65 - - - 143,789 $ - - - 664 (271,557) $ - 684 (2,550) - 13,025 $ 65 684 (2,550) 445 42,206 $ (1) Net income to the Company at December 27, 2015, December 28, 2014 and December 29, 2013 excludes $6,282, $4,382 and $3,442, respectively, allocable to the noncontrolling interests for our joint venture arrangements. At December 29, 2013, the accumulated other comprehensive income of $2,463 was comprised of unrealized foreign currency translation gains of $2,561, offset by a net unrealized loss on the interest rate swap agreement of $98. At December 28, 2014, the accumulated other comprehensive income of $671 was comprised of unrealized foreign currency translation gains of $933, offset by a net unrealized loss on the interest rate swap agreements of $262. At December 27, 2015, the accumulated other comprehensive loss of $1,836 was comprised of unrealized foreign currency translation loss of $411 and a net unrealized loss on the interest rate swap agreements of $1,425. See accompanying notes. 56 Papa John’s International, Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (In thousands) Operating activities Net income before attribution to noncontrolling interests Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: December 27, 2015 Years Ended December 28, 2014 December 29, 2013 $ 81,964 $ 77,697 $ 72,979 Provision for uncollectible accounts and notes receivable Depreciation and amortization Deferred income taxes Stock-based compensation expense Other Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions: Accounts receivable Income taxes receivable Inventories Prepaid expenses Other current assets Other assets and liabilities Accounts payable Income and other taxes payable Accrued expenses and other current liabilities Deferred revenue Net cash provided by operating activities Investing activities Purchases of property and equipment Loans issued Repayments of loans issued Acquisitions, net of cash acquired Proceeds from divestitures of restaurants Other Net cash used in investing activities Financing activities Net proceeds from issuance of long-term debt Cash dividends paid Excess tax benefit on equity awards Tax payments for equity award issuances Proceeds from exercise of stock options Acquisition of Company common stock Contributions from noncontrolling interest holders Distributions to noncontrolling interest holders Other Net cash used in financing activities Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents Change in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year Cash and cash equivalents at end of year See accompanying notes. 1,232 40,307 (6,246) 9,423 4,633 (9,179) 9,255 4,967 (2,425) 829 620 4,804 (1,113) 21,201 40 160,312 (38,972) (4,741) 5,183 (922) - 500 (38,952) 1,795 39,965 4,422 8,712 4,738 (5,741) (9,527) (2,838) (4,394) (387) 915 3,171 5,233 (665) (464) 122,632 (48,655) (6,816) 4,254 (4,773) 400 556 (55,034) 1,921 35,105 5,848 7,409 2,767 (11,058) - (857) (1,553) (1,458) (3,728) 3,029 (6,027) (2,536) (481) 101,360 (50,750) (6,095) 7,068 - - 339 (49,438) 25,549 (24,844) 10,151 (10,965) 5,197 (119,793) 684 (6,550) 444 (120,127) (349) 884 20,122 21,006 $ 72,551 (21,735) 10,282 (9,235) 5,837 (117,400) 1,086 (2,800) 491 (60,923) (223) 6,452 13,670 20,122 $ 69,642 (10,797) 4,755 (3,584) 6,865 (118,569) 950 (3,650) (327) (54,715) 67 (2,726) 16,396 13,670 $ 57 Papa John’s International, Inc. and Subsidiaries Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 1. Description of Business Papa John’s International, Inc. (referred to as the “Company,” “Papa John’s” or in the first person notations of “we,” “us” and “our”) operates and franchises pizza delivery and carryout restaurants under the trademark “Papa John’s,” currently in all 50 states and in 39 international countries and territories. Substantially all revenues are derived from retail sales of pizza and other food and beverage products to the general public by Company-owned restaurants, franchise royalties, sales of franchise and development rights, and sales to franchisees of food and paper products, printing and promotional items, risk management services, and information systems and related services used in their operations. 2. Significant Accounting Policies Principles of Consolidation The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Papa John’s and its subsidiaries. The results of our Company-owned operations in China were consolidated one month in arrears until fiscal 2013. The inclusion of the additional month of operations in fiscal 2013 resulted in $2.1 million of incremental international revenues and an incremental loss before income taxes of $215,000 reported in the international segment. This change in our consolidation policy did not have a material impact to our financial results for any of the years presented. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. Variable Interest Entity Papa John’s domestic restaurants, both Company-owned and franchised, participate in Papa John’s Marketing Fund, Inc. (PJMF), a nonstock corporation designed to operate at break-even for the purpose of designing and administering advertising and promotional programs for all participating domestic restaurants. PJMF is a variable interest entity (“VIE”) as it does not have sufficient equity to fund its operations without ongoing financial support and contributions from its members. Based on the ownership and governance structure and operating procedures of PJMF, we have determined that we do not have the power to direct the most significant activities of PJMF and are therefore not the primary beneficiary. Accordingly, consolidation of PJMF is not appropriate. Fiscal Year Our fiscal year ends on the last Sunday in December of each year. All fiscal years presented consist of 52 weeks. Use of Estimates The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Significant items that are subject to such estimates and assumptions include allowance for doubtful accounts and notes receivable, intangible assets, online customer loyalty program obligation, insurance reserves and tax reserves. Although management bases its estimates on historical experience and assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, actual results could significantly differ from these estimates. 58 2. Significant Accounting Policies (continued) Revenue Recognition Retail sales from Company-owned restaurants and franchise royalties, which are based on a percentage of franchise restaurant sales, are recognized as revenues when the products are delivered to or carried out by customers. Franchise fees are recognized when a franchised restaurant begins operations, at which time we have performed our obligations related to such fees. Fees received pursuant to development agreements which grant the right to develop franchised restaurants in future periods in specific geographic areas are deferred and recognized on a pro rata basis as franchised restaurants subject to the development agreements begin operations. The Company offers various incentive programs for franchisees including royalty incentives, new restaurant opening (i.e. development incentives) and other various support initiatives. Royalties, franchise and development fees and commissary sales are reduced to reflect any incentives earned or granted under these programs that are in the form of discounts. Direct mail advertising discounts are also periodically offered. Other sales are reduced to reflect these advertising discounts. Other development incentives for opening restaurants are offered in the form of Company equipment at no cost. This equipment is amortized over the term of the agreement, which is generally two to three years, and is recognized in other general expenses in our consolidated statements of income. Domestic production and distribution revenues are comprised of food, promotional items and supplies sold to franchised restaurants located in the United States and are recognized as revenue upon shipment of the related products to the franchisees. Fees for information services, including software maintenance fees, help desk fees and online ordering fees are recognized as revenue as such services are provided and are included in other sales. Insurance commissions are recognized as revenue over the term of the policy period and are included in other sales. International revenues are comprised of Company-owned restaurant sales, royalties, franchise fees and revenues for the production and distribution of food to international franchisees. Revenues are recognized consistently with the policies applied for revenues generated in the United States. Advertising and Related Costs Advertising and related costs include the costs of domestic Company-owned local restaurant activities such as mail coupons, door hangers and promotional items and contributions to PJMF and various local market cooperative advertising funds (“Co-op Funds”). Contributions by domestic Company-owned and franchised restaurants to PJMF and the Co-op Funds are based on an established percentage of monthly restaurant revenues. PJMF is responsible for developing and conducting marketing and advertising for the domestic Papa John’s system. The Co-op Funds are responsible for developing and conducting advertising activities in a specific market, including the placement of electronic and print materials developed by PJMF. We recognize domestic Company-owned restaurant contributions to PJMF and the Co-op Funds in which we do not have a controlling interest in the period in which the contribution accrues. The net assets of the Co-op Funds in which we possess majority voting rights, and thus control the cooperatives, are included in our consolidated balance sheets. Leases Lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the expected life of the lease term. A lease term often includes option periods, available at the inception of the lease. 59 2. Significant Accounting Policies (continued) Stock-Based Compensation Compensation expense for equity grants is estimated on the grant date, net of projected forfeitures, and is recognized over the vesting period (generally in equal installments over three years). Restricted stock is valued based on the market price of the Company’s shares on the date of grant. Stock options are valued using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. Our specific assumptions for estimating the fair value of options are included in Note 18. Cash Equivalents Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments with maturity of three months or less at date of purchase. These investments are carried at cost, which approximates fair value. Accounts Receivable Substantially all accounts receivable are due from franchisees for purchases of food, paper products, restaurant equipment, printing and promotional items, risk management services, information systems and related services, and royalties. Credit is extended based on an evaluation of the franchisee’s financial condition and collateral is generally not required. A reserve for uncollectible accounts is established as deemed necessary based upon overall accounts receivable aging levels and a specific review of accounts for franchisees with known financial difficulties. Account balances are charged off against the allowance after recovery efforts have ceased. Notes Receivable The Company provides financing to select franchisees principally for use in the construction and development of their restaurants and for the purchase of restaurants from the Company or other franchisees. Notes receivable bear interest at fixed or floating rates and are generally secured by the assets of each restaurant and the ownership interests in the franchise. We establish an allowance based on a review of each borrower’s economic performance and underlying collateral value. Note balances are charged off against the allowance after recovery efforts have ceased. Inventories Inventories, which consist of food products, paper goods and supplies, smallwares, and printing and promotional items, are stated at the lower of cost, determined under the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method, or market. Property and Equipment Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is recorded using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets (generally five to ten years for restaurant, commissary and other equipment, and 20 to 40 years for buildings and improvements). Leasehold improvements are amortized over the terms of the respective leases, including the first renewal period (generally five to ten years). Depreciation expense was $39.7 million in 2015, $39.1 million in 2014 and $34.5 million in 2013. 60 2. Significant Accounting Policies (continued) Deferred Costs We defer certain information systems development and related costs that meet established criteria. Amounts deferred, which are included in property and equipment, are amortized principally over periods not exceeding five years beginning in the month subsequent to completion of the related information systems project. Total costs deferred were approximately $2.6 million in 2015, $3.3 million in 2014 and $3.3 million in 2013. The unamortized information systems development costs approximated $9.1 million and $8.7 million as of December 27, 2015 and December 28, 2014, respectively. Intangible Assets – Goodwill We evaluate goodwill annually in the fourth quarter or whenever we identify certain triggering events or circumstances that would more-likely-than-not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. Such tests are completed separately with respect to the goodwill of each of our reporting units, which includes our domestic Company-owned restaurants, China and the United Kingdom (“PJUK”). We may perform a qualitative assessment or move directly to the quantitative assessment for any reporting unit in any period if we believe that it is more efficient or if impairment indicators exist. We elected to perform a qualitative assessment for our domestic Company-owned restaurants and PJUK reporting units in 2015. As a result of our qualitative analyses, we determined that it was more-likely- than-not that the fair values of our reporting units were greater than their carrying amounts. We performed a quantitative analysis for the goodwill of our China reporting unit using a market approach. The market approach considered earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) multiples that a potential buyer would pay based on third-party transactions in similar markets. The results of our quantitative assessment indicated the fair value significantly exceeded the carrying amount. Subsequent to completing our goodwill impairment tests, no indications of impairment were identified. Deferred Income Tax Accounts and Tax Reserves We are subject to income taxes in the United States and several foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes and the related assets and liabilities. The provision for income taxes includes income taxes paid, currently payable or receivable and those deferred. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities, and are measured using enacted tax rates and laws that are expected to be in effect when the differences reverse. Deferred tax assets are also recognized for the estimated future effects of tax loss carryforwards. The effect on deferred taxes of changes in tax rates is recognized in the period in which the new tax is enacted. As a result, our effective tax rate may fluctuate. Valuation allowances are established when necessary on a jurisdictional basis to reduce deferred tax assets to the amounts we expect to realize. Tax authorities periodically audit the Company. We record reserves and related interest and penalties for identified exposures as income tax expense. We evaluate these issues and adjust for events, such as statute of limitations expirations, court rulings or audit settlements, which may impact our ultimate payment for such exposures. 61 2. Significant Accounting Policies (continued) Insurance Reserves Our insurance programs for workers’ compensation, owned and non-owned automobiles, general liability, property, and health insurance coverage provided to our employees are funded by the Company up to certain retention levels under our retention programs. Retention limits generally range from $100,000 to $500,000 per occurrence. Losses are accrued based upon undiscounted estimates of the liability for claims incurred using certain third-party actuarial projections and our claims loss experience. The estimated insurance claims losses could be significantly affected should the frequency or ultimate cost of claims differ significantly from historical trends used to estimate the insurance reserves recorded by the Company. See Note 12 for additional information on our insurance reserves. Derivative Financial Instruments We recognize all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. At inception and on an ongoing basis, we assess whether each derivative that qualifies for hedge accounting continues to be highly effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of the hedged item. If the derivative meets the hedge criteria as defined by certain accounting standards, depending on the nature of the hedge, changes in the fair value of the derivative are either offset against the change in fair value of assets, liabilities or firm commitments through earnings or recognized in AOCI until the hedged item is recognized in earnings. The ineffective portion of a derivative’s change in fair value, if any, is immediately recognized in earnings. We recognized a loss of $1.8 million ($1.2 million after tax) in 2015, a loss of $261,000 ($164,000 after tax) in 2014 and a loss of $51,000 ($32,000 after tax) in 2013, in AOCI for the net change in the fair value of our interest rate swaps. See Note 9 for additional information on our debt and credit arrangements. Noncontrolling Interests The Company has the following four joint ventures in which there are noncontrolling interests: Joint Venture Redemption Feature Location within the Consolidated Balance Sheet Star Papa, LP PJ Denver, LLC Colonel’s Limited, LLC No redemption feature No redemption feature PJ Minnesota, LLC Redeemable Redeemable Temporary equity Temporary equity Permanent equity Permanent equity Recorded value Carrying value Redemption value Carrying value Carrying value Consolidated net income is required to be reported separately at amounts attributable to both the parent and the noncontrolling interest. Additionally, disclosures are required to clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent company and the interests of the noncontrolling owners, including a disclosure on the face of the consolidated statements of income attributable to the noncontrolling interest holder. See Note 6 for additional information regarding noncontrolling interests. 62 2. Significant Accounting Policies (continued) Foreign Currency Translation The local currency is the functional currency for our subsidiaries located in the United Kingdom, Mexico and China. Revenues and expenses are translated into U.S. dollars using monthly average exchange rates, while assets and liabilities are translated using year-end exchange rates. The resulting translation adjustments are included as a component of AOCI net of income taxes. Recent Accounting Pronouncements Income Taxes In November 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes” (Accounting Standards Update (“ASU” 2015-17). ASU 2015-17 requires the Company to classify deferred tax assets and liabilities as noncurrent amounts in the consolidated balance sheets. Such amounts were previously required to be classified as current and noncurrent assets and liabilities. The Company is required to adopt the provisions of ASU 2015-17 for fiscal 2017; however, the Company elected to retrospectively adopt the provisions for fiscal 2015, as allowed, and reclassified all previously reported current amounts as long-term. The consolidated balance sheet at December 28, 2014 includes a reclassification of $8.2 million from the previously reported current deferred income tax asset to a long-term deferred income tax liability. Deferred Debt Issuance Costs In April 2015, the FASB issued “Interest – Imputation of Interest: Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs” (ASU 2015-03). This update will require the Company to report deferred debt issuance costs as a reduction to long-term debt in the consolidated balance sheets. The Company currently reports these costs, which approximate $900,000 in 2015 and $1.2 million in 2014 as other noncurrent assets in the consolidated balance sheets. The Company will adopt ASU 2015-03 beginning in fiscal 2016 for all retrospective periods, as required. Revenue from Contract with Customers In May 2014, the FASB issued “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (ASU 2014-09), a comprehensive new revenue recognition standard that will supersede nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under GAAP. This update requires companies to recognize revenue at amounts that reflect the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services at the time of transfer. In doing so, companies will need to use more judgment and make more estimates than under today’s guidance. Such estimates may include identifying performance obligations in the contract, estimating the amount of variable consideration to include in the transaction price and allocating the transaction price to each separate performance obligation. Companies can either apply a full retrospective adoption or a modified retrospective adoption. We are required to adopt the new requirements in the first quarter of 2018. We are currently evaluating the method of adoption and impact of the new requirements on our consolidated financial statements. We currently do not believe the impact will be significant. 63 2. Significant Accounting Policies (continued) Reclassification Certain prior year amounts within cash flows provided by operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. 3. Stockholders’ Equity Shares Authorized and Outstanding The Company has authorized 5.0 million shares of preferred stock and 100.0 million shares of common stock. The Company’s outstanding shares of common stock, net of repurchased common stock, were 38.4 million shares at December 27, 2015 and 39.8 million shares at December 28, 2014. There were no shares of preferred stock issued or outstanding at December 27, 2015 and December 28, 2014. Two-for-one Stock Split and Treasury Retirement On October 29, 2013, our Board of Directors approved a two-for-one stock split of our outstanding shares. The stock split was effected in the form of a stock dividend and entitled each shareholder of record at the close of business on December 12, 2013 to receive one additional share for every outstanding share of stock held on the record date. The stock dividend was distributed on December 27, 2013 with approximately 21.0 million shares of stock distributed. All per share and share amounts in the accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes to the financial statements have been adjusted to reflect the stock split. In conjunction with the stock split, we retired shares held in treasury as of October 29, 2013, the date of approval by our Board of Directors. Share Repurchase Program Our Board of Directors has authorized the repurchase of up to $1.525 billion of common stock under a share repurchase program that began on December 9, 1999 and expires on February 28, 2017, including $125 million authorized in October 2015 and $75 million authorized in February 2016. Funding for the share repurchase program has been provided through a credit facility, operating cash flow, stock option exercises and cash and cash equivalents. We repurchased 1.8 million, 2.6 million and 3.5 million shares of our common stock for $119.8 million, $117.4 million and $118.6 million in 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively. Subsequent to year end through February 16, 2016, the Company acquired an additional 860,000 shares at an aggregate cost of $42.6 million. As of February 16, 2016, $167.1 million was available for repurchase of common stock under this authorization. Cash Dividend The Company initiated quarterly cash dividends to its shareholders during 2013. The Company paid dividends of $24.8 million in 2015, $21.7 million in 2014 and $10.8 million in 2013. Subsequent to fiscal 2016, our Board of Directors declared a first quarter 2016 cash dividend of $0.175 per share, or approximately $6.6 million. The dividend was paid on February 19, 2016 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on February 8, 2016. 64 4. Earnings per Share We compute earnings per share using the two-class method. The two-class method requires an earnings allocation formula that determines earnings per share for common shareholders and participating security holders according to dividends declared and participating rights in undistributed earnings. We consider time-based restricted stock awards to be participating securities because holders of such shares have non- forfeitable dividend rights. Under the two-class method, undistributed earnings allocated to participating securities are subtracted from net income attributable to the Company in determining net income attributable to common shareholders. Additionally, in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, the increase in the redemption value for the noncontrolling interest of PJ Denver, LLC reduces income attributable to common shareholders. Basic earnings per common share are computed by dividing net income attributable to common shareholders by the weighted-average common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per common share are computed by dividing the net income attributable to common shareholders by the diluted weighted average common shares outstanding. Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding consists of basic weighted average common shares outstanding plus weighted average awards outstanding under our equity compensation plans, which are dilutive securities. The calculations of basic earnings per common share and diluted earnings per common share for the years ended December 27, 2015, December 28, 2014 and December 29, 2013 are as follows (in thousands, except per share data): 2015 2014 2013 Basic earnings per common share: Net income attributable to the Company Decrease (increase) in noncontrolling interest redemption value Net income attributable to participating securities Net income attributable to common shareholders $ $ $ 75,682 65 (325) 75,422 73,315 (44) (402) 72,869 69,537 (510) (530) 68,497 $ $ $ Weighted average common shares outstanding Basic earnings per common share 39,458 1.91 $ 40,960 1.78 $ 43,387 1.58 $ Diluted earnings per common share: Net income attributable to common shareholders Weighted average common shares outstanding Dilutive effect of outstanding equity awards Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding Diluted earnings per common share $ 75,422 $ 72,869 $ 68,497 39,458 542 40,000 1.89 $ 40,960 758 41,718 1.75 $ 43,387 856 44,243 1.55 $ Shares subject to options to purchase common stock with an exercise price greater than the average market price for the year were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per common share because the effect would have been antidilutive. The weighted average number of shares subject to antidilutive options was 251,000 in 2015, 226,000 in 2014 and 129,000 in 2013. 65 4. Earnings per Share (continued) See Note 6 for additional information regarding our noncontrolling interests and Note 18 for equity awards, including restricted stock. 5. Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures We are required to determine the fair value of financial assets and liabilities based on the price that would be received to sell the asset or paid to transfer the liability to a market participant. Fair value is a market- based measurement, not an entity specific measurement. The fair value of certain assets and liabilities approximates carrying value because of the short-term nature of the accounts, including cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable. The carrying value of our notes receivable net of allowances also approximates fair value. The fair value of the amount outstanding under our revolving credit facility approximates its carrying value due to its variable market-based interest rate. These assets and liabilities are categorized as Level 1 as defined below. Certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a recurring basis and are required to be classified and disclosed in one of the following categories: • Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. • Level 2: Observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data. • Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data. Our financial assets and liabilities that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 27, 2015 and December 28, 2014 are as follows (in thousands): Carrying Value Fair Value Measurements Level 2 Level 1 Level 3 December 27, 2015 Financial assets: Cash surrender value of life insurance policies (a) Financial liabilities: Interest rate swaps (b) December 28, 2014 Financial assets: Cash surrender value of life insurance policies (a) Financial liabilities: Interest rate swap (b) $ 17,916 $ 17,916 $ - $ - 2,262 - 2,262 - $ 18,238 $ 18,238 $ - $ - 376 - 376 - (a) Represents life insurance policies held in our non-qualified deferred compensation plan. (b) The fair value of our interest rate swaps are based on the sum of all future net present value cash flows. The future cash flows are derived based on the terms of our interest rate swaps, as well as considering published discount factors, and projected London Interbank Offered Rates (“LIBOR”). There were no transfers among levels within the fair value hierarchy during fiscal 2015 or 2014. 66 6. Noncontrolling Interests Papa John’s has joint ventures in which there are noncontrolling interests, consisting of the following as of December 27, 2015, December 28, 2014 and December 29, 2013: Number of Restaurants Restaurant Locations Papa John's Ownership Noncontrolling Interest Ownership December 27, 2015 Star Papa, LP Colonel's Limited, LLC PJ Minnesota, LLC PJ Denver, LLC December 28, 2014 Star Papa, LP Colonel's Limited, LLC PJ Minnesota, LLC PJ Denver, LLC December 29, 2013 Star Papa, LP Colonel's Limited, LLC PJ Minnesota, LLC PJ Denver, LLC 87 61 33 32 84 56 35 25 81 52 33 25 Texas Maryland and Virginia Minnesota Colorado Texas Maryland and Virginia Minnesota Colorado Texas Maryland and Virginia Minnesota Colorado 51% 70% 70% 60% 51% 70% 70% 60% 51% 70% 80% 60% 49% 30% 30% 40% 49% 30% 30% 40% 49% 30% 20% 40% The noncontrolling interest holder’s ownership in PJ Minnesota, LLC increased from 20% to 30% in 2014 upon exercise of an option to acquire an additional 10% interest in the joint venture from the Company. The income before income taxes attributable to these joint ventures for the years ended December 27, 2015, December 28, 2014 and December 29, 2013 were as follows (in thousands): 2015 2014 2013 Papa John's International, Inc. Noncontrolling interests Total income before income taxes $ 9,725 6,282 16,007 $ $ 6,932 4,382 11,314 $ $ $ 5,121 3,442 8,563 The noncontrolling interests of our Colonel’s Limited, LLC and PJ Minnesota, LLC joint ventures are recorded at carrying value in “Stockholders’ equity” in the consolidated balance sheets at both December 27, 2015 and December 28, 2014, as the noncontrolling interest holders’ agreements had no redemption features. 67 6. Noncontrolling Interests (continued) The noncontrolling interest holders of two joint ventures have the option to require the Company to purchase their interests. Since redemption of the noncontrolling interests is outside of the Company’s control, the noncontrolling interests are presented in the caption “Redeemable noncontrolling interests” in the consolidated balance sheets and include the following joint ventures: • The Star Papa, LP agreement contains a redemption feature that is not currently redeemable, but it is probable to become redeemable in the future. Due to specific valuation provisions contained in the agreement, this noncontrolling interest has been recorded at its carrying value. • The PJ Denver, LLC agreement contains a redemption feature that is currently redeemable and, therefore, this noncontrolling interest has been recorded at its current redemption value. The change in redemption value is recorded as an adjustment to “Redeemable noncontrolling interests” and “Retained earnings” in the consolidated balance sheets. The following summarizes changes in our redeemable noncontrolling interests in 2015 and 2014 (in thousands): $ 7,024 2,487 (1,000) 44 8,555 3,873 (4,000) (65) 8,363 $ Balance at December 29, 2013 Net income Distributions to redeemable noncontrolling interest holders Change in redemption value Balance at December 28, 2014 Net income Distributions to redeemable noncontrolling interest holders Change in redemption value Balance at December 27, 2015 68 7. Acquisitions and Divestitures Acquisitions We acquired restaurants from our domestic franchisees in 2015 and 2014 (none in 2013), which are summarized as follows: Number of restaurants acquired 7 13 2015 2014 Location of restaurants acquired North Carolina, Missouri and Colorado Georgia, North Carolina, Illinois and Texas Purchase price (in thousands): Cash payment Cancellation of accounts and notes receivable Total purchase price 922 $ - $ 922 $ $ Fair value allocation of purchase price (in thousands): Property and equipment Reacquired franchise right Goodwill Other, including cash Total purchase price $ $ 648 113 152 9 922 $ $ 4,773 412 5,185 555 844 3,661 125 5,185 The restaurant acquisitions described above were accounted for by the purchase method of accounting, whereby operating results subsequent to the acquisition date are included in our consolidated financial results. The excess of the purchase price over the aggregate fair value of net assets acquired was allocated to goodwill for the Domestic Company-owned restaurants segment and is eligible for deduction over 15 years under U.S. tax regulations. On January 25, 2016, the Company purchased 19 domestic franchised Papa John’s restaurants in Alabama and Florida for approximately $11.0 million. Planned Divestiture In September 2015, the Company decided to refranchise the China Company-owned market and is planning a sale of its existing China operations, consisting of 45 Company-owned restaurants and a commissary. We expect to sell the business during 2016; upon completion of the sale, the Company will not have any Company-owned international restaurants. We have classified the assets as held for sale within the consolidated balance sheet. Upon the classification of these assets to held for sale, no loss was recognized as their fair value exceeded their carrying value. 69 7. Acquisitions and Divestitures (continued) The following summarizes the associated assets that are classified as held for sale (in thousands): December 27, 2015 Inventories Prepaid expenses Net property and equipment Goodwill Other assets Total assets held for sale $ 667 672 5,571 1,690 699 9,299 $ The Company-owned China operations have incurred losses before income taxes of $1.2 million in 2015, $3.4 million in 2014, and $2.7 million in 2013. The loss in 2014 includes an impairment and disposition charge of $1.0 million for eleven Company-owned restaurants in China. These results are reported in our International segment. 8. Goodwill The following summarizes changes to the Company’s goodwill, by reporting segment (in thousands): Domestic Company- owned Restaurants International (a) $ $ All Others 436 $ - - - 436 - - - $ 436 Total $ 79,391 3,661 (47) (998) 82,007 135 (1,690) (795) 79,657 20,388 - (47) (998) 19,343 - (1,690) (795) 16,858 Balance as of December 29, 2013 Acquisitions (b) Divestitures (c) Foreign currency adjustments Balance as of December 28, 2014 Acquisitions (d) Reclassification to assets held for sale (e) Foreign currency adjustments Balance as of December 27, 2015 58,567 3,661 - - 62,228 135 - - 62,363 $ $ $ (a) The international goodwill balances for all years presented are net of accumulated impairment of $2.3 million associated with our PJUK reporting unit, which was recorded in fiscal 2008. (b) Includes 13 restaurants located in four domestic markets. (c) Includes four restaurants located in the China market. (d) Primarily includes seven restaurants located in three domestic markets. (e) Represents goodwill associated with the Company-owned China market. The goodwill was reclassified to assets held for sale as we expect to sell the business in 2016. See Note 7 for additional information. 70 8. Goodwill (continued) For fiscal year 2015, we performed a qualitative analysis for our domestic Company-owned restaurants and our PJUK reporting unit and a quantitative analysis for our China reporting unit. For fiscal year 2014, we performed a quantitative analysis on each reporting unit. For fiscal year 2013, we performed a qualitative analysis for our domestic Company-owned restaurants and our China reporting unit and a quantitative analysis for our PJUK reporting unit. No impairment charges were recorded upon the completion of our goodwill impairment tests in 2013, 2014 and 2015. 9. Debt and Credit Arrangements Our debt is comprised entirely of an unsecured revolving credit facility (“Credit Facility”). The outstanding balance was $256.0 million as of December 27, 2015 and $230.5 million as of December 28, 2014. On October 31, 2014, we amended our Credit Facility to increase the amount available from $300 million to $400 million and to extend the maturity date from April 30, 2018 to October 31, 2019. Additionally, we have the option to increase the Credit Facility an additional $100 million. The interest rate charged on outstanding balances is LIBOR plus 75 to 175 basis points. The commitment fee on the unused balance ranges from 15 to 25 basis points. The remaining availability under the Credit Facility, reduced for outstanding letters of credit, was approximately $120.2 million as of December 27, 2015. The Credit Facility contains customary affirmative and negative covenants, including financial covenants requiring the maintenance of specified fixed charges and leverage ratios. At December 27, 2015, we were in compliance with these covenants. We use interest rate swaps to hedge against the effects of potential interest rate increases on borrowings under our Credit Facility. In 2015, we executed three additional forward starting swaps for $125.0 million that become effective in 2018 upon expiration of the two existing swaps for $125.0 million. As of December 27, 2015, we have the following interest rate swap agreements: Effective Dates Debt Amount July 30, 2013 through April 30, 2018 December 30, 2014 through April 30, 2018 April 30, 2018 through April 30, 2023 April 30, 2018 through April 30, 2023 April 30, 2018 through April 30, 2023 $75 million $50 million $55 million $35 million $35 million Fixed Rates 1.42% 1.36% 2.33% 2.36% 2.34% Our swaps are derivative instruments that are designated as cash flow hedges because the swaps provide a hedge against the effects of rising interest rates on borrowings. The newly executed forward starting swaps are also deemed cash flow hedges based on our intent to replace the existing facility that matures in 2019 with new variable rate debt. The swaps are highly effective cash flow hedges with no ineffectiveness for all periods presented. The newly executed forward starting swaps are deemed effective given the probability of future forecasted interest payments. 71 9. Debt and Credit Arrangements (continued) The effective portion of the gain or loss on the swaps is reported as a component of AOCI and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the swaps affect earnings. Gains or losses on the swaps representing either hedge ineffectiveness or hedge components excluded from the assessment of effectiveness are recognized in current earnings. Amounts payable or receivable under the swaps are accounted for as adjustments to interest expense. The following table provides information on the location and amounts of our swaps in the accompanying consolidated financial statements (in thousands): Liability Derivatives Balance Sheet Location Fair Value December 27, 2015 Fair Value December 28, 2014 Interest rate swaps Other current and long-term liabilities $ 2,262 $ 376 There were no derivatives that were not designated as hedging instruments. The effect of derivative instruments on the accompanying consolidated financial statements is as follows (in thousands): Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in AOCI on Derivative (Effective Portion) Location of Gain or (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into Income (Effective Portion) Amount of Gain or (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into Income (Effective Portion) Derivatives - Cash Flow Hedging Relationships Interest rate swaps: Location of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing) Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing) 2015 2014 2013 $ $ $ (1,163) (164) (32) Interest expense Interest expense Interest expense $ $ $ (1,563) (996) (501) Interest expense Interest expense Interest expense $ - $ - $ - The weighted average interest rates for the Credit Facility, including the impact of the previously mentioned swap agreements, were 2.0%, 1.7% and 1.4% in fiscal 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Interest paid, including payments made or received under the swaps, was $5.3 million in 2015, $3.7 million in 2014 and $2.0 million in 2013. As of December 27, 2015, the portion of the $2.3 million liability associated with the interest rate swap that would be reclassified into earnings during the next 12 months as interest expense approximates $470,000. 72 10. Net Property and Equipment Net property and equipment consists of the following (in thousands): Land Buildings and improvements Leasehold improvements Equipment and other Construction in progress Total property and equipment Accumulated depreciation and amortization Net property and equipment 11. Notes Receivable December 27, 2015 $ December 28, 2014 $ 32,795 87,010 110,903 333,884 10,970 575,562 (361,518) 214,044 32,880 86,892 110,323 320,480 6,466 557,041 (337,584) 219,457 $ $ Selected franchisees have borrowed funds from the Company, principally for use in the construction and development of their restaurants. We have also entered into loan agreements with certain franchisees that purchased restaurants from us or from other franchisees. Loans outstanding were approximately $18.9 million on a consolidated basis as of December 27, 2015 and December 28, 2014, net of allowance for doubtful accounts. Notes receivable bear interest at fixed or floating rates and are generally secured by the assets of each restaurant and the ownership interests in the franchisee. The carrying amounts of the loans approximate fair value. Interest income recorded on franchisee loans was approximately $731,000 in 2015, $658,000 in 2014 and $527,000 in 2013 and is reported in investment income in the accompanying consolidated statements of income. Based on our review of certain borrowers’ economic performance and underlying collateral value, we established allowances of $3.7 million and $3.1 million as of December 27, 2015 and December 28, 2014, respectively, for potentially uncollectible notes receivable. The following summarizes changes in our notes receivable allowance for doubtful accounts (in thousands): Balance as of December 29, 2013 Recovered from costs and expenses Additions, net of notes written off Balance as of December 28, 2014 Recovered from costs and expenses Additions, net of notes written off Balance as of December 27, 2015 $ $ 3,387 (502) 247 3,132 (100) 621 3,653 73 12. Insurance Reserves The following table summarizes changes in our insurance program reserves (in thousands): Balance as of December 29, 2013 Additions Payments Balance as of December 28, 2014 Additions Payments Balance as of December 27, 2015 $ 19,465 33,926 (27,980) 25,411 39,272 (34,133) 30,550 $ We are a party to standby letters of credit with off-balance sheet risk associated with our insurance programs. The total amount committed under letters of credit for these programs was $23.7 million at December 27, 2015. 13. Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consist of the following (in thousands): Salaries, benefits and bonuses Legal costs* Insurance reserves, current Purchases Deposits Customer loyalty program Marketing Rent Utilities Consulting and professional fees Other Total December 27, 2015 $ December 28, 2014 $ 24,124 13,163 13,382 10,504 2,953 2,734 1,977 1,940 1,621 1,324 7,196 80,918 19,427 995 11,149 8,132 4,120 2,357 1,543 1,626 1,399 2,226 5,319 58,293 $ $ * Includes a $12.3 million legal settlement in 2015 (See Note 17). 74 14. Other Long-term Liabilities Other long-term liabilities consist of the following (in thousands): December 27, 2015 December 28, 2014 Deferred compensation plan Insurance reserves Accrued rent Other Total 15. Income Taxes $ $ 18,483 17,168 5,216 6,739 47,606 17,599 14,262 5,387 4,627 41,875 $ $ A summary of the provision for income taxes follows (in thousands): 2015 2014 2013 Current: Federal Foreign State and local Deferred (federal and state) Total $ $ $ 36,077 4,183 3,169 (6,246) 37,183 26,919 2,368 2,849 4,422 36,558 $ $ $ 24,231 1,974 1,077 5,848 33,130 Significant deferred tax assets (liabilities) follow (in thousands): Accrued liabilities Accrued bonuses Other assets and liabilities Equity awards Other Foreign net operating losses Valuation allowance on foreign net operating and capital losses and foreign deferred tax assets Total deferred tax assets Deferred expenses Accelerated depreciation Goodwill Other Total deferred tax liabilities Net deferred (liability) asset December 27, 2015 December 28, 2014 $ 19,277 4,621 11,488 6,866 3,662 4,769 $ 12,319 3,624 11,109 6,494 3,730 6,322 (2,866) 47,817 (2,932) 40,666 (6,861) (21,434) (16,752) (4,965) (50,012) (2,195) $ (6,141) (21,425) (15,725) (7,401) (50,692) (10,026) $ 75 15. Income Taxes (continued) The Company had approximately $21.9 million and $29.7 million of foreign tax net operating loss carryovers as of December 27, 2015 and December 28, 2014, respectively. The Company had approximately $2.9 million of a valuation allowance primarily related to these foreign net operating losses as of December 27, 2015 and December 28, 2014. The net change in the total valuation allowance was a decrease of $66,000 in 2015. A substantial majority of our foreign tax net operating losses do not have an expiration date. The reconciliation of income tax computed at the U.S. federal statutory rate to income tax expense for the years ended December 27, 2015, December 28, 2014 and December 29, 2013 is as follows in both dollars and as a percentage of income before income taxes ($ in thousands): 2015 2014 2013 Income Tax Expense Income Tax Rate Income Tax Expense Income Tax Rate Income Tax Expense Income Tax Rate Tax at U.S. federal statutory rate State and local income taxes Foreign income taxes Income of consolidated partnerships attributable to noncontrolling interests Non-qualified deferred compensation plan (income) loss Tax credits Other Total $ 41,702 2,106 2,432 35.0% 1.8% 2.0% $ 39,989 1,896 2,368 35.0% 1.7% 2.1% $ 37,138 1,820 1,974 35.0% 1.7% 1.9% (2,311) (1.9%) (1,608) (1.4%) (1,263) (1.2%) 218 (4,846) (2,118) 37,183 $ 0.2% (4.1%) (1.8%) 31.2% (171) (3,906) (2,010) 36,558 $ (0.2%) (3.4%) (1.8%) 32.0% (599) (3,161) (2,779) 33,130 $ (0.6%) (3.0%) (2.6%) 31.2% Income taxes paid were $23.3 million in 2015, $27.0 million in 2014 and $29.3 million in 2013. The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various states and foreign jurisdictions. The Company, with few exceptions, is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local, or non-U.S. income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2011. The Company is currently undergoing examinations by various tax authorities. The Company anticipates that the finalization of these current examinations and other issues could result in a decrease in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits (and a decrease of income tax expense) of approximately $550,000 during the next 12 months. 76 15. Income Taxes (continued) The Company had $3.7 million of unrecognized tax benefits at December 27, 2015 of which, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending liability for unrecognized tax benefits excluding interest and penalties is as follows (in thousands): Balance at December 29, 2013 Additions for tax positions of prior years Reductions for lapse of statute of limitations Balance at December 28, 2014 Additions for tax positions of current year Additions for tax positions of prior years Reductions for lapse of statute of limitations Balance at December 27, 2015 $ 2,661 1,167 (1,015) 2,813 344 1,303 (775) 3,685 $ The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a part of income tax expense. The Company’s 2015 and 2014 income tax expense includes interest benefits of $141,000 and $35,000, respectively. The Company has accrued approximately $536,000 and $674,000 for the payment of interest and penalties as of December 27, 2015 and December 28, 2014, respectively. 16. Related Party Transactions Certain of our officers own equity interests in entities that franchise restaurants. Following is a summary of full-year transactions and year-end balances with franchisees owned by related parties and PJMF (in thousands): 2015 2014 2013 Revenues from affiliates: Commissary sales Other sales Franchise royalties Total $ $ $ 2,298 432 394 3,124 2,679 482 385 3,546 2,426 482 351 3,259 $ $ $ December 27, 2015 December 28, 2014 Accounts receivable - affiliates $ 157 $ 114 Accounts payable - affiliates $ - $ 249 The revenues from affiliates were at rates and terms available to independent franchisees. We paid $653,000 in 2015, $770,000 in 2014 and $1.1 million in 2013 for charter aircraft services provided by an entity owned by our Founder, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. On November 12, 2013, we repurchased $38.6 million of our common stock (1.0 million shares at the closing price of $38.61 per share) from our Founder, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. 77 16. Related Party Transactions (continued) We had the following transactions with PJMF: • PJMF reimbursed Papa John’s $841,000, $634,000 and $2.2 million in 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively, for certain costs associated with national pizza giveaways awarded to our online loyalty program customers. • PJMF reimbursed Papa John’s $1.4 million, $1.2 million, and $782,000 in 2015, 2014, and 2013, respectively, for certain administrative services (i.e., marketing, accounting, and information services), graphic design services, services and expenses of our founder as brand spokesman, and for software maintenance fees. 17. Litigation, Commitments and Contingencies Litigation The Company is involved in a number of lawsuits, claims, investigations and proceedings, including those specifically identified below, consisting of intellectual property, employment, consumer, commercial and other matters arising in the ordinary course of business. In accordance with ASC 450 “Contingencies,” the Company has made accruals with respect to these matters, where appropriate, which are reflected in the Company’s financial statements. We review these provisions at least quarterly and adjust these provisions to reflect the impact of negotiations, settlements, rulings, advice of legal counsel and other information and events pertaining to a particular case. Perrin v. Papa John’s International, Inc. and Papa John’s USA, Inc. is a conditionally certified collective and class action filed in August 2009 in the United States District Court, Eastern District of Missouri (“the Court”), alleging that delivery drivers were not properly reimbursed for mileage and expenses in accordance with the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”). Approximately 3,900 drivers out of a potential class size of 28,800 opted into the action. In December 2013, the Court granted a motion for class certification in five additional states, which added approximately 15,000 plaintiffs to the case. The parties reached a settlement in principle, which was preliminarily approved by the Court in September 2015. With the preliminary settlement agreement, the Company recorded a pre-tax expense of $12.3 million in June 2015 under the provisions of ASC 450, Contingencies. This amount is separately reported as Legal settlement expense in the consolidated statements of income. The Court issued its final order approving the settlement on January 12, 2016, with no changes to the previously recorded expense. The Company then remitted funds to the administrator for the payment of claims and plaintiffs’ attorney fees. The Company continues to deny any wrongdoing in this matter. Leases We lease office, retail and commissary space under operating leases, which have an average term of five years and provide for at least one renewal. Certain leases further provide that the lease payments may be increased annually based on the fixed rate terms or adjustable terms such as the Consumer Price Index. PJUK, our subsidiary located in the United Kingdom, leases certain retail space, which is primarily subleased to our franchisees. We also lease the tractors and trailers used by our distribution subsidiary, PJFS, for an average period of seven years. Total lease expense was $36.2 million in 2015, $34.7 million in 2014 and $33.2 million in 2013, net of sublease payments received. We subleased certain sites to our franchisees and other third parties in 2015, 2014 and 2013 and received payments of $6.5 million, $6.7 million and $4.9 million, respectively, which are netted against the corresponding expense. 78 17. Litigation, Commitments and Contingencies (continued) Future gross lease costs, future expected sublease payments and net lease costs as of December 27, 2015, are as follows (in thousands): Gross Lease Costs Future Expected Sublease Payments Net Lease Costs $ $ $ 41,710 37,672 32,153 25,079 17,134 54,532 208,280 6,457 6,169 6,044 5,852 5,524 33,450 63,496 35,253 31,503 26,109 19,227 11,610 21,082 144,784 $ $ $ Year 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Thereafter Total The Company’s headquarters facility is leased under a capital lease arrangement with the City of Jeffersontown, Kentucky in connection with the issuance of $80.2 million in Industrial Revenue Bonds. The bonds are held 100% by the Company and, accordingly, the bond obligation and investment and related interest income and expense are eliminated in the consolidated financial statements resulting in the Company’s net investment cost being reported in net property and equipment. 18. Equity Compensation We award stock options, time-based restricted stock and performance-based restricted stock units from time to time under the Papa John’s International, Inc. 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan. There are approximately 7.0 million shares of common stock authorized for issuance and remaining available under the 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan as of December 27, 2015. Option awards are granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of the Company’s stock at the date of grant. Options outstanding as of December 27, 2015 generally expire five or ten years from the date of grant and vest over a three-year period. We recorded stock-based employee compensation expense of $9.4 million in 2015, $8.7 million in 2014 and $7.4 million in 2013. The total income tax benefit recognized in the consolidated income statement for share-based compensation arrangements was $3.5 million in 2015, $3.2 million in 2014 and $2.7 million in 2013. At December 27, 2015, there was $7.8 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested option awards, time-based restricted stock and performance-based restricted stock units, of which the Company expects to recognize $5.3 million in 2016, $2.1 million in 2017 and $330,000 in 2018. Stock Options Options exercised, which were issued from authorized shares, included 441,000 shares in 2015, 759,000 shares in 2014 and 697,000 shares in 2013. The total intrinsic value of the options exercised during 2015, 2014 and 2013 was $20.3 million, $25.3 million and $13.1 million, respectively. Cash received upon the exercise of stock options was $5.2 million, $5.8 million and $6.9 million during 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and the related tax benefits realized were approximately $7.5 million, $9.4 million and $4.8 million during the corresponding periods. 79 18. Equity Compensation (continued) Information pertaining to option activity during 2015 is as follows (number of options and aggregate intrinsic value in thousands): Weighted Average Weighted Remaining Outstanding at December 28, 2014 Granted Exercised Cancelled Outstanding at December 27, 2015 Exercisable at December 27, 2015 Number Average Contractual Aggregate Intrinsic Value Term (In Years) of Options 1,564 330 (441) (34) 1,419 817 Exercise Price $24.52 64.51 18.18 53.21 $35.10 $21.77 6.28 4.61 $31,521 $27,429 The following is a summary of the significant assumptions used in estimating the fair value of options granted in 2015, 2014 and 2013: Assumptions (weighted average): Risk-free interest rate Expected dividend yield Expected volatility Expected term (in years) 2015 2014 2013 1.6% 0.9% 28.5% 5.5 1.8% 1.0% 35.7% 6.0 1.1% 0.1% 37.5% 6.0 The risk-free interest rate for the periods within the contractual life of an option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The expected dividend yield was estimated as the annual dividend divided by the market price of the Company’s shares on the date of grant. Expected volatility was estimated by using the Company’s historical share price volatility for a period similar to the expected life of the option. Options granted generally vest in equal installments over three years and expire five or ten years after grant. The expected term for these options represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding. The expected term for 2015 was calculated using historical experience and the expected term for 2014 and 2013 was calculated using the simplified method prescribed by Securities and Exchange Commission rules and regulations because the expiration term of our options increased from five to ten years and there was insufficient historical detail to be used to estimate the expected term. The weighted average grant-date fair values of options granted during 2015, 2014 and 2013 was $16.93, $16.48 and $9.87, respectively. The Company granted options to purchase 330,000, 293,000 and 498,000 shares in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. 80 18. Equity Compensation (continued) Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units We granted shares of restricted stock that are time-based and generally vest in equal installments over three years (76,000 in 2015, 89,000 in 2014 and 157,000 in 2013). Upon vesting, the shares are issued from treasury stock. These restricted shares are intended to focus participants on our long-range objectives, while at the same time serving as a retention mechanism. We consider time-based restricted stock awards to be participating securities because holders of such shares have non-forfeitable dividend rights. We declared dividends totaling $110,000 ($0.63 per share) in 2015, $128,000 ($0.53 per share) in 2014 and $86,000 ($0.25 per share) in 2013 to holders of time-based restricted stock. Additionally, we granted stock settled performance-based restricted stock units to executive management (12,000 in 2015, 17,000 in 2014, and 3,000 in 2013). The vesting of these awards (a three-year cliff vest) is dependent upon the Company’s achievement of a compounded annual growth rate of earnings per share and the achievement of certain sales and unit growth metrics. Upon vesting, the shares are issued from authorized shares. The fair value of both time-based restricted stock and performance-based restricted stock units is based on the market price of the Company’s shares on the grant date. Information pertaining to these awards during 2015 is as follows (shares in thousands): Total as of December 28, 2014 Granted Incremental Performance Shares* Forfeited Vested Total as of December 27, 2015 Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value 31.81 64.44 18.78 52.10 24.43 51.21 $ Shares 286 88 70 (13) (247) 184 *Additional shares from the 2012 performance-based restricted stock unit grant due to exceeding the initial 100% target resulting in a 207% payout. 19. Employee Benefit Plans We have established the Papa John’s International, Inc. 401(k) Plan (the “401(k) Plan”), as a defined contribution benefit plan, in accordance with Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. The 401(k) Plan is open to employees who meet certain eligibility requirements and allows participating employees to defer receipt of a portion of their compensation and contribute such amount to one or more investment funds. At our discretion, we may make matching contribution payments, which are subject to vesting based on an employee’s length of service with us. In addition, we maintain a non-qualified deferred compensation plan available to certain employees and directors. Under this plan, the participants may defer a certain amount of their compensation, which is credited to the participants’ accounts. The participant-directed investments associated with this plan are included in other long-term assets ($17.9 million and $18.2 million at December 27, 2015 and December 28, 2014, respectively) and the associated liabilities ($18.5 million and $17.6 million at December 27, 2015 and December 28, 2014, respectively) are included in other long-term liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. 81 19. Employee Benefit Plans (continued) At our discretion, we contributed a matching payment of 3%, up to a maximum of 6% deferred, in 2015 and contributed 1.5%, up to a maximum of 6% deferred, in 2014 and 2013 of a participating employee’s earnings deferred into both the 401(k) Plan and the non-qualified deferred compensation plan. Such costs were $1.5 million in 2015, $734,000 in 2014 and $691,000 in 2013. 20. Segment Information We have five reportable segments for all years presented: domestic Company-owned restaurants, domestic commissaries, North America franchising, international operations, and “all other” units. The domestic Company-owned restaurant segment consists of the operations of all domestic (“domestic” is defined as contiguous United States) Company-owned restaurants and derives its revenues principally from retail sales of pizza and side items, including breadsticks, cheesesticks, chicken poppers and wings, dessert items and canned or bottled beverages. The domestic commissary segment consists of the operations of our regional dough production and product distribution centers and derives its revenues principally from the sale and distribution of food and paper products to domestic Company-owned and franchised restaurants. The North America franchising segment consists of our franchise sales and support activities and derives its revenues from sales of franchise and development rights and collection of royalties from our franchisees located in the United States and Canada. The international operations segment principally consists of our Company-owned restaurants in China and distribution sales to franchised Papa John’s restaurants located in the United Kingdom, Mexico and China and our franchise sales and support activities, which derive revenues from sales of franchise and development rights and the collection of royalties from our international franchisees. International franchisees are defined as all franchise operations outside of the United States and Canada. All other business units that do not meet the quantitative thresholds for determining reportable segments, which are not operating segments, we refer to as our “all other” segment, which consists of operations that derive revenues from the sale, principally to Company-owned and franchised restaurants, of printing and promotional items, risk management services, and information systems and related services used in restaurant operations, including our point- of-sale system, online and other technology-based ordering platforms. Generally, we evaluate performance and allocate resources based on profit or loss from operations before income taxes and intercompany eliminations. Certain administrative and capital costs are allocated to segments based upon predetermined rates or actual estimated resource usage. We account for intercompany sales or transfers as if the sales or transfers were to third parties and eliminate the activity in consolidation. Our reportable segments are business units that provide different products or services. Separate management of each segment is required because each business unit is subject to different operational issues and strategies. No single external customer accounted for 10% or more of our consolidated revenues. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies (see Note 2). 82 20. Segment Information (continued) Our segment information is as follows: (In thousands) 2015 2014 2013 Revenues from external customers: Domestic Company-owned restaurants Domestic commissaries North America franchising International All others Total revenues from external customers Intersegment revenues: Domestic commissaries North America franchising International All others Total intersegment revenues Depreciation and amortization: Domestic Company-owned restaurants Domestic commissaries International All others Unallocated corporate expenses Total depreciation and amortization Income (loss) before income taxes: Domestic Company-owned restaurants Domestic commissaries North America franchising International All others Unallocated corporate expenses (1) Elimination of intersegment profits Total income before income taxes $ $ $ 756,307 615,610 96,056 104,691 64,711 1,637,375 701,854 629,492 90,169 102,455 74,179 1,598,149 $ $ $ 635,317 578,870 82,873 88,640 53,322 1,439,022 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 224,067 2,690 292 14,821 241,870 14,841 6,205 2,935 4,829 11,497 40,307 56,452 44,721 83,315 10,891 845 (75,896) (1,181) 119,147 220,406 2,400 320 22,851 245,977 13,829 6,776 3,903 6,156 9,301 39,965 40,969 39,317 77,009 7,250 (9) (49,440) (841) 114,255 191,756 2,222 280 14,197 208,455 13,284 5,690 3,966 5,320 6,845 35,105 34,590 37,804 70,201 2,803 3,490 (41,025) (1,754) 106,109 $ $ $ (1) Includes a $12.3 million legal settlement expense in 2015. See Note 17 for additional information. 83 20. Segment Information (continued) (In thousands) 2015 2014 2013 Property and equipment: Domestic Company-owned restaurants Domestic commissaries International All others Unallocated corporate assets Accumulated depreciation and amortization Net property and equipment Expenditures for property and equipment: Domestic Company-owned restaurants Domestic commissaries International All others Unallocated corporate Total expenditures for property and equipment $ $ $ 223,246 110,344 14,826 47,481 179,665 (361,518) 214,044 14,631 3,924 4,540 4,701 11,176 38,972 208,488 107,992 25,443 46,013 169,105 (337,584) 219,457 23,475 5,756 1,708 5,906 11,810 48,655 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 195,526 104,509 27,225 41,064 158,462 (314,689) 212,097 13,149 9,791 3,754 4,689 19,367 50,750 21. Quarterly Data - Unaudited, in Thousands, except Per Share Data Our quarterly select financial data is as follows: 2015 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Quarter Total revenues Operating income Net income attributable to the Company (a) Basic earnings per common share (a) Diluted earnings per common share (a) Dividends declared per common share $ 432,284 37,645 22,236 0.56 0.55 0.140 $ $ $ $ 398,991 30,996 10,780 0.27 0.27 0.140 $ $ $ $ 389,284 27,437 17,971 0.46 0.45 0.175 $ $ $ $ 416,816 40,229 24,695 0.63 0.62 0.175 $ $ $ 2014 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Quarter Total revenues Operating income Net income attributable to the Company Basic earnings per common share Diluted earnings per common share Dividends declared per common share $ 401,377 32,002 19,311 0.46 0.45 0.125 $ $ $ $ 380,864 26,999 16,748 0.40 0.40 0.125 $ $ $ $ 390,399 25,186 16,075 0.39 0.39 0.140 $ $ $ $ 425,509 33,443 21,181 0.53 0.52 0.140 $ $ $ (a) The second quarter of 2015 includes an after tax legal settlement expense of $8.0 million and a negative impact of $0.20 on basic and diluted earnings per share. See Note 17 for additional information. All quarterly information is presented in 13-week periods. Quarterly earnings per share on a full-year basis may not agree to the consolidated statements of income due to rounding. 84 Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure None. Item 9A. Controls and Procedures (a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act). Based upon this evaluation, the CEO and CFO concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective. (b) Management’s Report on our Internal Control over Financial Reporting Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act. Our internal control system is designed to provide reasonable assurance to our management and the board of directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our CEO and CFO, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO) of the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework). Based on our evaluation under the COSO 2013 Framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 27, 2015. Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has audited the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and, as part of its audit, has issued an attestation report, included herein, on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. 85 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Papa John’s International, Inc. and Subsidiaries We have audited Papa John’s International, Inc. and Subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 27, 2015, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework) (the COSO criteria). Papa John’s International, Inc. and Subsidiaries’ management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying “Management’s Report on our Internal Control over Financial Reporting.” Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. In our opinion, Papa John’s International, Inc. and Subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 27, 2015, based on the COSO criteria. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets as of December 27, 2015 and December 28, 2014, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 27, 2015 of Papa John’s International, Inc. and Subsidiaries and our report dated February 23, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon. Louisville, Kentucky February 23, 2016 /s/ Ernst & Young LLP 86 (c) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 27, 2015 that have materially affected, or are likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Item 9B. Other Information None. Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance PART III Information regarding executive officers is included above under the caption “Executive Officers of the Registrant” at the end of Part I of this Report. Other information regarding directors, executive officers and corporate governance appearing under the captions “Corporate Governance,” “Item 1, Election of Directors,” “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” and “Executive Compensation / Compensation Discussion and Analysis” is incorporated by reference from the Company’s definitive proxy statement, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Report. We have adopted a written code of ethics that applies to our directors, officers and employees. We intend to post all required disclosures concerning any amendments to or waivers from, our code of ethics on our website to the extent permitted by NASDAQ. Our code of ethics can be found on our website, which is located at www.papajohns.com. Item 11. Executive Compensation Information regarding executive compensation appearing under the captions “Executive Compensation / Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” “Compensation Committee Report” and “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions – Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” is incorporated by reference from the Company’s definitive proxy statement, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Report. 87 Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters The following table provides information as of December 27, 2015 regarding the number of shares of the Company’s common stock that may be issued under the Company’s equity compensation plans. (a) Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (b) Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights (c) Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans, excluding securities reflected in column (a) 1,418,539 160,521 1,579,060 $35.10 $35.10 7,027,157 7,027,157 Plan Category Equity compensation plans approved by security holders Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders * Total * Represents shares of common stock issuable pursuant to the non-qualified deferred compensation plan. The weighted average exercise price (column b) does not include any assumed price for issuance of shares pursuant to the non-qualified deferred compensation plan. Information regarding security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters appearing under the caption “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” is incorporated by reference from the Company’s definitive proxy statement, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Report. Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence Information regarding certain relationships and related transactions, and director independence appearing under the captions “Corporate Governance” and “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” is incorporated by reference from the Company’s definitive proxy statement, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Report. Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services Information regarding principal accounting fees and services appearing under the caption “Ratification of the Selection of Independent Auditors” is incorporated by reference from the Company’s definitive proxy statement, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Report. 88 PART IV Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules (a)(1) Financial Statements: The following consolidated financial statements, notes related thereto and report of independent auditors are included in Item 8 of this Report: • Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm • Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 27, 2015, December 28, 2014 and December 29, 2013 • Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 27, 2015, December 28, 2014 and December 29, 2013 • Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 27, 2015 and December 28, 2014 • Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 27, 2015, December 28, 2014 and December 29, 2013 • Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 27, 2015, December 28, 2014 and December 29, 2013 • Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 89 (a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules: Schedule II – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts (in thousands) Classification Fiscal year ended December 27, 2015: Deducted from asset accounts: Reserve for uncollectible accounts receivable Reserve for franchisee notes receivable Valuation allowance on foreign net operating losses Fiscal year ended December 28, 2014: Deducted from asset accounts: Reserve for uncollectible accounts receivable Reserve for franchisee notes receivable Valuation allowance on foreign net operating losses Fiscal year ended December 29, 2013: Deducted from asset accounts: Reserve for uncollectible accounts receivable Reserve for franchisee notes receivable Valuation allowance on foreign net operating losses Balance at Beginning of Year Charged to (recovered from) Costs and Expenses Additions / (Deductions) Balance at End of Year $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 3,814 3,132 2,932 9,878 4,318 3,387 7,682 15,387 3,057 5,028 8,240 16,325 $ $ $ $ 1,332 (100) (66) 1,166 2,297 (502) (4,750) (2,955) 2,416 (495) (558) 1,363 (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) $ $ (2,699) 621 - (2,078) $ $ (2,801) 247 - (2,554) $ $ (1,155) (1,146) - (2,301) $ $ 2,447 3,653 2,866 8,966 $ $ 3,814 3,132 2,932 9,878 $ 4,318 3,387 7,682 15,387 $ (1) Uncollectible accounts written off and reclassifications between accounts and notes receivable reserves. All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulation of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under the related instructions or are inapplicable and, therefore, have been omitted. (a)(3) Exhibits: The exhibits listed in the accompanying index to Exhibits are filed as part of this Form 10-K. 90 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. Date: February 23, 2016 PAPA JOHN’S INTERNATIONAL, INC. By: /s/ John H. Schnatter John H. Schnatter Founder, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. Signature Title Date /s/ John H. Schnatter John H. Schnatter Founder, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) February 23, 2016 /s/ Norborne P. Cole, Jr. Norborne P. Cole, Jr. Director February 23, 2016 /s/ Christopher L. Coleman Director Christopher L. Coleman February 23, 2016 /s/ Olivia F. Kirtley Olivia F. Kirtley Director February 23, 2016 /s/ Laurette T. Koellner Laurette T. Koellner Director February 23, 2016 /s/ Sonya E. Medina Sonya E. Medina Director February 23, 2016 /s/ Mark S. Shapiro Mark S. Shapiro Director /s/ W. Kent Taylor W. Kent Taylor Director /s/ Lance F. Tucker Lance F. Tucker Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Administrative Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) February 23, 2016 February 23, 2016 February 23, 2016 91 Exhibit Number EXHIBIT INDEX Description of Exhibit 3.1 3.2 4.1 4.2 10.1* 10.2* 10.3* 10.4* 10.5 10.6* 10.7* Our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation. Exhibit 3.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 29, 2014, is incorporated herein by reference. Our Amended and Restated By-Laws. Exhibit 3.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 27, 2015, is incorporated herein by reference. Specimen Common Stock Certificate. Exhibit 4.1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1995 (Commission File No. 0-21660) is incorporated herein by reference. Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Restated By-Laws (see Exhibits 3.1 and 3.2 above) are incorporated herein by reference. Employment Agreement between Papa John’s International, Inc. and Steve M. Ritchie effective March 1, 2015. Exhibit 10.1 to our report on Form 10-K as filed on February 24, 2015 is incorporated herein by reference. Employment Agreement between Papa John’s International, Inc. and Lance F. Tucker effective March 1, 2015. Exhibit 10.2 to our report on Form 10-K as filed on February 24, 2015 is incorporated herein by reference. Employment Agreement between Papa John’s International, Inc. and Timothy C. O’Hern effective March 1, 2015. Exhibit 10.3 to our report on Form 10-K as filed on February 24, 2015 is incorporated herein by reference. Employment Agreement between Papa John’s International, Inc. and Robert C. Kraut effective October 7, 2013. Exhibit 10.4 to our report on Form 10-K as filed on February 24, 2015 is incorporated herein by reference. $400,000,000 First Amendment to First Amended and Restated Credit Agreement by and among Papa John’s International, Inc.; the Guarantors party thereto; PNC Bank, National Association, as a lender and in its capacity as Administrative Agent for the lenders; JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as a lender and in its capacity as Co-Syndication Agent for the lenders; U.S. Bank, National Association, as a lender and in its capacity as Co- Syndication Agent for the lenders; Bank of America, N.A., as a lender and in its capacity as Documentation Agent for the lenders; and Branch Banking and Trust Company, as a lender. Exhibit 10.1 to our Report on Form 8-K as filed on November 4, 2014 is incorporated herein by reference. Papa John’s International, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended through December 5, 2012. Exhibit 10.1 to our report on Form 10-K as filed on February 28, 2013 is incorporated herein by reference. Papa John’s International, Inc. 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan. Exhibit 10.1 to our Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-150762) dated May 5, 2008 is incorporated herein by reference. 92 10.8* 10.9* 10.10* 10.11* 10.12* 21 23 31.1 31.2 32.1 32.2 101 Papa John’s International, Inc. 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan. Exhibit 4.1 to our report on Form 8-K as filed on May 3, 2011 is incorporated herein by reference. Agreement for Service as Chairman between John H. Schnatter and Papa John’s International, Inc. Exhibit 10.1 to our report on Form 8-K as filed on August 15, 2007 is incorporated herein by reference. Agreement for Service as Founder between John H. Schnatter and Papa John’s International, Inc. Exhibit 10.1 to our report on Form 8-K as filed on August 15, 2007 is incorporated herein by reference. Amended and Restated Exclusive License Agreement between John H. Schnatter and Papa John’s International, Inc. Exhibit 10.1 to our report on Form 8-K as filed on May 19, 2008 is incorporated herein by reference. Papa John’s International, Inc. Severance Pay Plan. Exhibit 10.1 to our report on Form 10-Q filed on May 1, 2012, is incorporated herein by reference. Subsidiaries of the Company. Consent of Ernst & Young LLP. Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a- 15(e). Section 302 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a- 15(e). Section 906 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Section 906 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Financial statements from the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Papa John’s International, Inc. for the year ended December 27, 2015, filed on February 23, 2016, formatted in XBRL: (i) the Consolidated Statements of Income, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity, (v) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (vi) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. __________________ *Compensatory plan required to be filed as an exhibit pursuant to Item 15(c) of Form 10-K. The Exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K are not contained herein. The Company will furnish a copy of any of the Exhibits to a stockholder upon written request to Investor Relations, Papa John’s International, Inc., P.O. Box 99900, Louisville, KY 40269-0900. 93 Papa John’s 39 International Markets* Canada Cayman Islands Dominican Republic United Kingdom Ireland Cyprus Belarus Turkey Jordan Azerbaijan Russia China South Korea Puerto Rico Guam Mexico El Salvador Guatemala Nicaragua Costa Rica India Malaysia Trinidad Venezuela Egypt Singapore Chile Saudi Arabia Philippines Panama Colombia Ecuador Peru Bolivia Kuwait Bahrain Qatar United Arab Emirates Oman * International Locations as of December 27, 2015 “IF YOU’RE GOING TO SAY BETTER, YOU BETTER DELIVER.”
Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above