Peoples Bancorp Inc.
2010 Annual Report to Shareholders
3
Our Mission Statement
Our Core Values
Our mission is to be the primary financial resource for our target
Peoples’ Core Values represent how we do business and our
clients. We grow these relationships by delivering trusted advice,
never-ending pursuit of creating value for our clients. Our
extraordinary personal service and a seamless, integrated
strategies to serve clients and enhance shareholder value often
suite of services that meets all their needs. Our target clients
change, but our Core Values remain constant.
are businesses and consumers who value us as true financial
partners.
Our success depends on empowering our skilled and dedicated
personnel to meet and exceed our clients’ needs. We win by
• Clients as a Focus
• Business with Integrity
• Trust Among Clients, Communities and Associates
serving clients, supporting those who serve clients and delivering
• Commitment to Communities
a competitive return to our shareholders.
• Continuous Will to Win
We are a team and we are good teammates. We take care of our
• Development of Associate Skills
customers and we take care of each other.
Our Vision
Our Service Promise
Our vision is to be the leading financial services provider to the
We believe in helping people. We promise to partner with our
clients and markets we serve.
clients and teammates to deliver the right banking, investment and
insurance solutions for every stage of life.
missionvisionvaluespromise A commitment
to growth.
Peoples Bancorp is a company built on the
promise of helping people. We help because
we are committed to fostering excellence
within our communities. We’re committed
because we are part of the community. We
live, work and raise our families here. It is
here where we celebrate victories together and
lean on our friends when times are tough.
We’re stable. We’re lending responsibly.
Together, we’re building our community.
A Message from President and Chief Executive Officer
David L. Mead
Fellow Shareholders,
2010 brought a lot of changes to Peoples Bancorp Inc. and the financial services industry
in general. Federal Reserve Board Regulation E brought substantial changes to checking
overdraft services effective in August 2010. The regulation significantly curtails fees that
financial institutions may charge for providing overdraft services to customers. Legislation known as
the Dodd-Frank Act was signed into law on July 21, 2010, which will have far-reaching implications
across the financial regulatory landscape. The legislation will create a new consumer protection
agency that will have yet unknown implications for financial services companies. Additionally, in late
2010, talk in Washington, D.C. turned to the interchange fees that financial institutions receive from
vendors that accept debit card transactions, which may limit another source of revenue to banks.
This rapid pace of regulatory changes and the impact on financial services companies create
challenges for Peoples and our industry as a whole.
Other changes included departures of several members of the Board of Directors in 2010. Mr. Robert
Price departed from the Board on May 31, after serving nine years as a Director. Mr. David Archer
departed from the Board on October 15, after serving 17 years as a Director. Both Mr. Price and
Mr. Archer resigned from the Board in order to devote more time to their own growing businesses.
In addition, Mr. Joseph Wesel retired from the Board in November at the age of 81, after 36 years
of service as a Director. He held the position of Chairman of the Board from 1991 until 2003, and
from 2005 to 2008. The Board of Directors greatly appreciates the combined 62 years of service
of Mr. Price, Mr. Archer and Mr. Wesel. Recognizing these years of service, each former director
was named Director Emeritus of the Peoples Bancorp Board of Directors. They each made many
valuable contributions to our company and their participation on the Board will be missed.
It has been my honor and pleasure to serve on the Board of Directors of Peoples Bank since 2005
and Peoples Bancorp since 2006. In addition to continuing service on both Boards, I am serving on
an interim basis as President and Chief Executive Officer of Peoples Bancorp and Peoples Bank. I
assumed this role last August while the company began its search for a permanent President and
CEO. At the time of writing this letter, the company has made significant progress with this search.
I am pleased to say that the company has not been idle while conducting this search for a new
President and CEO. After several months of concentrated work, we recently completed a new
strategic plan for 2011 to 2015 with specific objectives and initiatives to grow our company. We
have also recently hired a new Executive Vice President, Human Resources, Michael Hager, who
2
brings a wealth of experience in human capital management. Mike was not the only addition to
our executive team in recent months. Richard Stafford joined our company in February, 2010 as
Executive Vice President, Retail Banking. Rick's approach to banking and serving customers has
helped us meet growth goals and improve customer satisfaction.
A significant and important development in 2010 was positioning the company to return TARP capital
to the federal government. The company received regulatory approval to return $21 million of U.S.
Treasury Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) capital funds and made payment on February 2, 2011.
“One of the most valuable assets to our
company is our team of talented associates.”
2010 – Challenging Financial Results
Peoples Bancorp's performance in 2010 continued to be challenged by the severe economic
downturn that began several years ago and the lack of any real progress in an economic
recovery in 2010. Earnings per common share (EPS) improved from $0.22 in 2009 to $0.34 in 2010.
While it is nice to report that there was an improvement in EPS, other performance metrics, such
as a return on assets and return on equity, were simply below standards.
So what things worked well in 2010 and what things did not work so well? What did not fair well
for the company in 2010 was the continued high level of loan losses driven by the weakened
economy and the long-run steady decline in real estate collateral values. Net loan charge-offs in
2010 were $27.4 million compared to $21.4 million in 2009. The expense for the provision for loan
losses in 2010 was $26.9 million compared to $25.7 million in 2009. We did, however, experience
an improvement in our year-end allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans, which
was at a historically high percentage of 2.79%. Another challenge in 2010 was the level of net
interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis, which declined from $63.4 million in 2009 to
$61.4 million in 2010. The primary cause of this decline was lower total earning assets despite a
slight uptick in the net interest margin to 3.51% in 2010.
What did fair well for Peoples Bancorp in 2010 was a dramatic reduction in impairment losses
on securities from $7.7 million in 2009 to $1.8 million in 2010. This resulted in a significant
improvement to net income and earnings per share. Another improvement in 2010 was a
reduction in other non-interest expense from $58.7 million in 2009 to $57.0 million in 2010. This was
a result of a concerted effort to reduce our overhead costs.
3
Also positive, our year-end capital position was strong and our liquidity sources were deep.
It is frequently noted that our capital ratios have been significantly higher than the regulatory
minimums to be considered "well capitalized." In today's environment, meeting defined "well
capitalized" ratios in our industry may no longer be adequate. Specifically, the total risked-based
capital ratio to be "well capitalized" is 10%. At year-end, our ratio compares at 18.24% including
capital from the U.S. Treasury Capital Purchase Program. Reflecting the partial return of TARP
capital in early 2011, our adjusted total risk-based capital ratio at year-end would still have been
quite strong at 16.40%.
The full detail of our financial performance is discussed in the Management Discussion and
Analysis section found later in this report. Please take an opportunity to read this, as it provides
additional insight and details of our 2010 financial performance.
2010 – Activities
Our company has a strong franchise and we are a customer focused organization. We made
enhancements throughout 2010 to continue to better serve our customers across our market
footprint. A new full-service branch was opened in Lancaster, Ohio. This state-of-the-art facility
increases the service quality that we offer this community and increases opportunities for growth
in a vibrant market. New seasoned commercial lenders in our Huntington, West Virginia, and
Zanesville and Columbus, Ohio markets were added to better serve those markets and grow
market share.
We also implemented new initiatives in 2010, such as the development of a new line of personal
checking accounts that provide our customers with extra features, more value and added
conveniences. This new line of personal checking packages rolled out at the start of 2011. During
the summer of 2010, we entered the realm of social media with our new Facebook and Twitter
pages. Social media brings a new set of innovative tools that help us better connect with our
customers and build new relationships. Customer Service initiatives have always been integral
to the success of our company. We continue with our Service Design Team that is focused on
even further enhancing our service and sales efforts across all business lines. While we always
had great customer service ratings, our recent results were even better. Our overall customer
satisfaction results for 2010 and continuing into 2011 exceed 95%.
In addition to enhancements made in the area of customer service, we focused on improving our
processes to evaluate risks throughout the organization. Our Enterprise Risk Management (ERM)
process is a framework by which we ensure that we balance the risks and rewards of our actions.
This process will enhance risk management as we move forward.
4
“It takes people to achieve the
goals and objectives of our strategic plan.”
Outlook for 2011
As previously noted, 2011 started off with a significant development for the company. The
company returned $21 million of the total $39 million TARP funds received in 2009. I am pleased
to report that this partial return of TARP funds was accomplished without the need to raise other
capital by issuing additional common shares and diluting common shareholder interests. The
elimination of dividends related to the return of $21 million in TARP funds will add approximately
$0.10 back to earnings per share to common shareholders on a full-year basis.
We do not feel there will be dramatic improvement in the economy during 2011. Consequently, we
expect the company will continue to face challenges with asset quality matters. On a positive note,
we experienced a steady decline in the level of watch-rated credits during 2010 and coming into
2011. However, the level of non-performing assets, those assets more severely impaired, remains
historically high coming into 2011. This could result in continued elevated charge-offs in the near
term. Going forward, the company has recently implemented a new software system that will
make commercial loan approvals, tracking and review more efficient. Other processes are being
evaluated that will allow lending officers to be more proactive in business development activities.
We view 2011 as a transition year for the company as we continue to diligently work through asset
quality matters, but also embark on a number of strategic initiatives of our new strategic plan
for 2011-2015. The new strategic plan calls for growing our company over the next five years and
becoming a high performing institution in all of our business lines, while continuing to adhere to
careful risk management. Our goals and objectives for 2011 are specifically tied to our long-term
vision for our company.
It takes people to achieve the goals and objectives of our strategic plan. The most valuable
asset of the company is our team of talented associates. These associates have a commitment
to providing excellent customer service, a will-to-win and a strong desire to make our company
better every day. We are confident of our ability to manage through the current economic
environment and achieve our objectives.
David L. Mead
President and Chief Executive Officer
5
Directors and Officers
Peoples Bancorp Inc. and
Peoples Bank Directors
Carl l. Baker, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer
B & N Coal, Inc.
GeorGe W. BrouGhton
Owner and President
Broughton Commercial Properties, LLC
GWB Specialty Foods, LLC
GWB Oil & Gas, LLC
Wilford d. dimit
Vice Chairman, Peoples Bank
Retired
First Settlement Inc.
riChard ferGuson
Chairman, Peoples Bancorp Inc.
Owner
Ferguson Consulting, LLC
Brenda f. Jones, m.d.
Medical Director
Marietta Ophthalmology Associates, Inc.
david l. mead
President & Chief Executive Officer
Peoples Bancorp Inc. and Peoples Bank
t. Pat sauBer
Vice President
T.C.K.S., Inc.
Paul t. theisen
Vice Chairman, Peoples Bancorp Inc.
Chairman, Peoples Bank
Retired
Attorney-At-Law
thomas J. Wolf
Owner
McDonald’s Restaurants
Peoples Bancorp Inc.
Directors Emeritus
dave m. arCher
JeWell Baker
frank l. ChristY
Barton s. holl
norman J. murraY
fred r. PriCe
roBert W. PriCe
thomas C. vadakin
JosePh h. Wesel
Peoples Bancorp Inc. Officers
david l. mead
President & Chief Executive Officer
Peoples Bank Executive Officers
david l. mead
President & Chief Executive Officer
miChael W. haGer
Executive Vice President
Human Resources
daniel k. mCGill
Executive Vice President
Chief Commercial Lending Officer
Carol a. sChneeBerGer
Executive Vice President
Operations and Cashier
edWard G. sloane
Executive Vice President
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
riChard W. stafford
Executive Vice President
Retail Banking
JosePh s. YazomBek
Executive Vice President
Chief Credit Officer
miChael W. haGer
Executive Vice President
Human Resources
daniel k. mCGill
Executive Vice President
Chief Commercial Lending Officer
Carol a. sChneeBerGer
Executive Vice President
Operations
edWard G. sloane
Executive Vice President
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
riChard W. stafford
Executive Vice President
Retail Banking
JosePh s. YazomBek
Executive Vice President
Chief Credit Officer
rhonda l. mears
General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
douGlas G. ankrom
Controller
amY m. auCh
Assistant Corporate Secretary
Director Emeritus
JOSEPH H. WESEL
Joseph H. Wesel has been elected Director Emeritus of the
Peoples Bancorp Board of Directors in recognition of his
36-years of corporate leadership as a Director. Mr. Wesel
was a dedicated member of the Peoples Bancorp Inc. Board
of Directors since 1980, and the Board of Directors of its
subsidiary, Peoples Bank, National Association, since 1974. In
addition to serving on various committees, Mr. Wesel held
Peoples Bank Director Emeritus
harold d. lauGhlin
the position of Chairman of the People Bancorp Inc. Board from 1991 until 2003,
and from 2005 until 2008.
Peoples Bancorp and its subsidiaries have benefitted significantly from Mr. Wesel’s
wisdom and integrity. He has led with loyalty, dignity and vision. We wish him
great joy and happiness in his retirement.
6
Ohio West Virginia Kentucky
BoYd CountY
Ashland
Summit
GreenuP CountY
Greenup
Russell
CaBell CountY
Huntington
mason CountY
Point Pleasant
Wetzel CountY
New Martinsville
Steelton
Wood CountY
Parkersburg
Vienna
meiGs CountY
Middleport
Pomeroy
morGan CountY
McConnelsville
muskinGum CountY
Zanesville
noBle CountY
Caldwell
WashinGton CountY
Belpre
Lowell
Marietta
Reno
athens CountY
Athens
Nelsonville
The Plains
Belmont CountY
Flushing
fairfield CountY
Baltimore
Carroll
Lancaster
franklin CountY
Westerville
Gallia CountY
Gallipolis
GuernseY CountY
Byesville
Cambridge
Quaker City
7
Peoples Bancorp Inc. is a $1.8 billion financial holding company headquartered in Marietta, Ohio. Peoples Bank,
the company’s principal operating subsidiary, provides a comprehensive suite of financial services through 47 offices in Ohio, West
Virginia and Kentucky, as well as through telephone and Internet banking channels, plus a network of 40 ATMs. Through Peoples
Bank, Peoples Financial Advisors and Peoples Insurance Agency, LLC (including Barengo Insurance Agency and Putnam Agency),
our nearly 600 dedicated associates deliver consumer and commercial banking, mortgage lending, personal lending, investment
management, brokerage and trust services, together with a full range of life, health, property and casualty insurance products.
Peoples’ common shares are traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market® under the symbol PEBO, and Peoples is a member
of the Russell 3000 index of US publicly-traded companies. Learn more about Peoples at www.peoplesbancorp.com.
Financial Highlights
Dollars in Thousands, except Per Share Data
Earnings and Dividends
net income available to common shareholders
total revenues (1)
dividends declared on common shares
Per Share Data
earnings per common share – Basic
earnings per common share – diluted
Cash dividends paid on common shares
Book value at end of period
tangible book value at end of period (2)
Closing stock price
Financial Ratios
return on average assets
return on average common stockholders’ equity
net interest margin
efficiency ratio (3)
total risk-based capital ratio
tangible common equity to tangible assets (2)
At Year End
total assets
total investment securities
total loans
total deposits
Preferred stockholders’ equity
Common stockholders’ equity
trust & brokerage assets under management
2010
2009
2008
$ 3,529
$ 91,536
$ 4,211
$ 0.34
$ 0.34
$ 0.40
$ 18.36
$ 12.16
$ 15.65
0.28%
1.76%
3.51%
60.30%
18.24%
7.17%
$ 1,837,985
$ 641,307
$ 960,718
$ 1,361,600
$ 38,645
$ 192,036
$ 1,093,166
$ 2,314
$ 93,893
$ 6,901
$ 0.22
$ 0.22
$ 0.66
$ 19.80
$ 13.48
$ 9.68
0.21%
1.17%
3.48%
60.14%
16.80%
7.22%
$ 2,001,827
$ 751,866
$ 1,052,058
$ 1,395,886
$ 38,543
$ 205,425
$ 967,472
$ 7,455
$ 90,576
$ 9,470
$ 0.72
$ 0.72
$ 0.91
$ 18.06
$ 11.63
$ 19.13
0.39%
3.67%
3.51%
56.30%
13.19%
6.21%
$ 2,002,338
$ 708,753
$ 1,104,032
$ 1,366,368
$
—
$ 186,626
$ 870,006
(1) net interest income and non-interest income.
(2) excludes balance sheet impact of intangible assets acquired through acquisitions on both stockholders’ equity and total assets.
(3) non-interest expense (less intangible amortization) as a percentage of fully-tax equivalent net interest income plus non-interest income.
Peoples Bancorp (w/logo)® is a federally registered service mark of Peoples Bancorp inc.
Peoples Bank (w/logo)® is a federally registered service mark of Peoples Bancorp inc.
Peoples financial advisors (w/logo)® is a federally registered service mark of Peoples Bank, national association.
8
Document Incorporated by Reference:
Portions of Registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement relating to the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held April 28, 2011, are
incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
Item 1.
Business
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
Item 2.
Properties
Item 3.
Legal Proceedings
Item 4.
[Reserved]
PART II
Item 5.
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases
of Equity Securities
Item 6.
Selected Financial Data
Item 7.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Item 9.
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Item 9B. Other Information
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Item 11.
Executive Compensation
Item 12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters
Item 13.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Item 14.
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
PART IV
Item 15.
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
Signatures
Exhibit Index
2
Page
3
16
21
21
21
21
22
24
26
52
52
52
52
53
94
94
95
967
96
97
98
99
As used in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Form 10-K”), “Peoples” refers to Peoples Bancorp Inc. and its
consolidated subsidiaries collectively, except where the context indicates the reference relates solely to the registrant, Peoples
Bancorp Inc. Unless otherwise indicated, all note references contained in this Form 10-K refer to the Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Corporate Overview
PART I
Peoples Bancorp Inc. is an Ohio corporation and a financial holding company organized in 1980. Peoples operates
principally through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Peoples Bank, National Association (“Peoples Bank”). At December 31,
2010, Peoples’ other wholly-owned subsidiaries included Peoples Investment Company and PEBO Capital Trust I. Peoples
Bank owned Peoples Insurance Agency, LLC (“Peoples Insurance”) and PBNA, L.L.C., an asset management company.
Peoples Investment Company owned Peoples Capital Corporation.
Peoples Bank was first chartered in 1902 as an Ohio banking corporation under the name “The Peoples Banking and
Trust Company” in Marietta, Ohio, and was later reorganized as a national banking association under its current name in
2000. Peoples Insurance was first chartered in 1994 as an Ohio corporation under the name “Northwest Territory Property
and Casualty Insurance Agency, Inc.” In late 1995, Peoples Insurance was awarded insurance agency powers in the State of
Ohio, becoming the first insurance agency in Ohio to be affiliated with a financial institution. Peoples Insurance was
converted from an Ohio corporation to an Ohio limited liability company under its current name in December 2009.
Peoples Investment Company, its subsidiary, Peoples Capital Corporation, and PBNA, L.L.C. were formed in 2001 to
optimize Peoples’ consolidated capital position and provide new investment opportunities as a means of enhancing
profitability. These opportunities include, but are not limited to, investments in low-income housing tax credit funds or
projects, venture capital and other higher risk investments, which are either limited or restricted at Peoples Bank. Presently,
the operations of these companies do not represent a material part of Peoples’ overall business activities.
Business Overview
Peoples makes available a complete line of banking, investment, insurance and trust solutions through its financial units
– Peoples Bank, Peoples Insurance and Peoples Financial Advisors (a division of Peoples Bank). These products and
services include the following:
various demand deposit accounts, savings accounts, money market accounts and certificates of deposit
commercial, consumer and real estate mortgage loans (both commercial and residential) and lines of credit
debit and automated teller machine (“ATM”) cards
corporate and personal trust services
safe deposit rental facilities
travelers checks, money orders and cashier’s checks
full range of life, health and property and casualty insurance products
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o custom-tailored fiduciary and wealth management services
Peoples’ financial products and services are offered through its financial service locations and ATMs in Ohio, West
Virginia and Kentucky, as well as telephone and internet-based banking. Brokerage services are offered exclusively through
an unaffiliated registered broker-dealer located at Peoples Bank’s offices. Peoples also makes available credit cards to
consumers and businesses, as well as merchant credit card processing services, through joint marketing arrangements with
third parties.
Since 1996, Peoples has undertaken a controlled and steady expansion strategy involving a combination of internal and
external growth. This strategy has included the opening of de novo banking and loan production offices, acquisitions of
existing banking offices, both individually and as part of entire institutions, and acquisitions of two insurance agencies. As a
result, Peoples has experienced growth in total assets and its capital position, as well as expansion of its customer base and
primary market area. This strategy has also provided opportunities for Peoples to integrate non-traditional products and
services, such as insurance and investments, with the traditional banking products offered to its clients. During this period,
Peoples also has taken steps to improve operating efficiency by redirecting resources to offices and markets with greater
growth potential. These actions have included the consolidation of existing banking offices with acquired offices in close
proximity to each other and sale of certain banking offices.
3
Recent Corporate Developments
As more fully described in Note 11 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Peoples received $39 million
of new equity capital from the United States Department of the Treasury (the “U.S. Treasury”) on January 30, 2009. This
new equity capital was obtained under the TARP Capital Purchase Program and was in the form of 39,000 shares of Fixed
Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Shares, Series A, each without par value and having a liquidation preference of $1,000
per share (the “Series A Preferred Shares”) and a 10-year warrant to purchase 313,505 Peoples’ common shares (the
“Warrant”). On February 2, 2011, Peoples completed a partial repurchase of the Series A Preferred Shares issued to the U.S.
Treasury. Additional information regarding the TARP Capital Purchase Program and the restrictions imposed on Peoples can
be found under the “TARP Capital Purchase Program” heading in the “Supervision and Regulation” section included later in
this item.
Primary Market Area and Customers
Peoples considers its primary market area to consist of the counties where it has a physical presence and neighboring
counties. This market area currently includes the counties of Athens, Belmont, Fairfield, Franklin, Gallia, Guernsey, Meigs,
Morgan, Muskingum, Noble and Washington in Ohio; Cabell, Mason, Wetzel and Wood in West Virginia; and Boyd and
Greenup in Kentucky. This market area encompasses the Metropolitan Statistical Areas (“MSA”) of Parkersburg-Marietta-
Vienna, WV-OH and Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH, and portions of the Columbus OH and Wheeling, WV-OH MSAs.
This primary market area largely consists of rural or small urban areas with a diverse group of industries and employers.
Principal industries in this area include health care, education and other social services; plastics and petrochemical
manufacturing; oil, gas and coal production; and tourism and other service-related industries. Because of this diversity,
Peoples is not dependent upon any single industry segment for its business opportunities.
Lending Activities
Peoples originates various types of loans, including commercial and commercial real estate loans, residential real estate
loans, home equity lines of credit, real estate construction loans, and consumer loans. Peoples’ lending activities are focused
principally on lending opportunities within its primary market areas, although Peoples occasionally originates loans outside
its primary markets related to existing customer relationships. In general, Peoples retains the majority of loans it originates;
however, certain longer-term fixed-rate mortgage loan originations, primarily one-to-four family residential mortgages, are
sold into the secondary market.
Peoples’ loans consist of credits to borrowers spread over a broad range of industrial classifications. At December 31,
2010, Peoples had no concentration of loans to borrowers engaged in the same or similar industries that exceeded 10% of
total loans nor had any loans outstanding to non-U.S. entities.
LegalLendingLimit
Federal regulations impose a limit on the aggregate amount a financial institution may lend to one borrower,
including certain related or affiliated borrowers. This legal lending limit is generally 15% of the institution’s total
capital, as defined by risk-based capital regulations, plus any allowance for loan losses not already included in total
capital. At December 31, 2010, Peoples’ legal lending limit was approximately $28.3 million. During 2010, Peoples did
not extend credit to any one borrower in excess of its legal lending limit.
CommercialLending
Commercial, financial and agricultural loans (“commercial loans”), including loans secured by commercial real
estate, represent the largest portion of Peoples’ total loan portfolio, comprising approximately 63.1% of total loans at
December 31, 2010. Commercial lending inherently involves a significant degree of risk of loss since commercial loan
relationships generally involve larger loan balances than other loan classes. Additionally, repayment of commercial
loans normally depends on adequate cash flows of a business, which can be negatively impacted by adverse changes in
the general economy or in a specific industry.
COMMERCIAL LENDING PRACTICES. Loan terms include amortization schedules and interest rates commensurate with the
purpose of each loan, the source of repayment and the risk involved. The majority of Peoples’ commercial loans
carry variable interest rates equal to an underlying index rate plus a margin. Peoples occasionally originates
commercial loans with fixed interest rates for periods generally ranging from 3 to 5 years. The primary analytical
technique used in determining whether to grant a commercial loan is the review of a schedule of cash flows to
evaluate whether the borrower’s anticipated future cash flows will be adequate to service both interest and principal
due. Additionally, collateral is reviewed to determine its value in relation to the loan.
The Peoples Bank Board of Directors Loan Committee is required to approve loans secured by real estate of $4
million or more, loans secured by all other assets of $2 million or more and unsecured loans of $1 million or more.
Approval of the Peoples Bank Board of Directors Loan Committee is required for all new loans, regardless of
4
amount, to borrowers whose aggregate debt to Peoples Bank, including the principal amount of the proposed loan, is
$5 million or more.
The Peoples Bank Board of Directors is required to approve all new loans of $10 million or more and any loan,
regardless of amount, to borrowers whose aggregate debt to Peoples Bank, including the principal amount of the
proposed loan, is $15 million or more.
Peoples evaluates all commercial loan relationships whenever a new loan causes the aggregate debt to Peoples
to exceed $250,000. On an annual basis, Peoples evaluates all loan relationships whose aggregate debt to Peoples is
greater than $500,000 for possible credit deterioration. This loan review process provides Peoples with
opportunities to identify potential problem loans and take proactive actions to assure repayment of the loan or
minimize Peoples’ risk of loss, such as reviewing the relationship more frequently based upon the loan quality rating
and aggregate debt outstanding. Upon detection of the reduced ability of a borrower to meet cash flow obligations,
the loan is reviewed for possible downgrading or placement on nonaccrual status.
RealEstateLoans
While commercial loans comprise the largest portion of Peoples’ loan portfolio, generating residential real estate
loans remains a major focus of Peoples’ lending efforts, whether the loans are ultimately sold into the secondary market
or retained in Peoples’ loan portfolio. At December 31, 2010, portfolio residential real estate loans comprised 20.8% of
total loans. Peoples also had $3.8 million of residential real estate loans held for sale and was servicing $250.6 million
of loans, consisting primarily of one-to-four family residential mortgages, previously sold in the secondary market.
Peoples originates both fixed-rate and adjustable-rate real estate loans. Typically, the longer-term fixed-rate real
estate loans are sold in the secondary market, with Peoples retaining servicing rights on those loans. In select cases,
Peoples may retain certain fixed-rate real estate loans or sell the loans without retaining the servicing rights.
REAL ESTATE LENDING PRACTICES. Peoples typically requires residential real estate loan amounts to be no more than
80% of the purchase price or the appraised value of the real estate securing the loan, whichever is lower, unless
private mortgage insurance is obtained by the borrower for the percentage exceeding 80%. In limited
circumstances, Peoples may lend up to 100% of the appraised value of the real estate, although such lending
currently is limited to loans that qualify under established federally backed rural housing programs. The risk
conditions of real estate loans are considered during underwriting for the purposes of establishing an interest rate
commensurate with the risks inherent in mortgage lending and remaining equity of the home, if any.
Real estate loans are typically secured by first mortgages with evidence of title in favor of Peoples in the form
of an attorney’s opinion of the title or a title insurance policy. Peoples also requires proof of hazard insurance, with
Peoples named as the mortgagee and loss payee. Licensed appraisals are required for all real estate loans.
HomeEquityLinesofCredit
Peoples originates home equity lines of credit that provide consumers with greater flexibility in financing personal
expenditures. At December 31, 2010, home equity lines of credit comprised 5.0% of Peoples’ total loans. Peoples
currently offers home equity lines of credit with a prime-based variable rate for the entire 10-year term of the loan. In
prior years, Peoples also offered a home equity line of credit whose terms included a fixed rate for the first five years and
converting to a variable interest rate for the remaining five years. At December 31, 2010, total outstanding principal
balances and available credit amounts of these convertible rate home equity lines of credit were $18.0 million and $12.6
million, respectively, and weighted-average remaining maturity of 5.3 years.
HOME EQUITY LENDING PRACTICES. Home equity lines of credit are generally made as second mortgages by Peoples.
The maximum amount of a home equity line of credit is generally limited to 80% of the appraised value of the
property less the balance of the first mortgage. Peoples will lend up to 90% of the appraised value of the property at
higher interest rates that are commensurate with the additional risk being assumed in these situations. The home
equity lines of credit are written with ten-year terms and are subject to review upon request for renewal.
ConstructionLoans
Peoples originates various construction loans to provide temporary financing during the construction phase for
commercial and residential properties. At December 31, 2010, construction loans comprised 2.3% of Peoples’ loan
portfolio. Construction financing is generally considered to involve the highest risk since Peoples is dependent largely
upon the accuracy of the initial estimate of the property’s value at completion of construction and the estimated cost
(including interest) of construction. If the estimated construction cost proves to be inaccurate, Peoples may be required
to advance funds beyond the amount originally committed to enable completion of the project. In certain cases, such as
real estate development projects, repayment of construction loans occurs as a result of subsequent sales of the developed
real estate.
5
CONSTRUCTION LENDING PRACTICES. Peoples’ construction lending is focused primarily on commercial and residential
projects of select real estate developers and homebuilders. These projects include the construction of office, retail or
industrial complexes and real estate development for either residential or commercial uses. The underwriting
criteria for construction loans is generally the same as for non-construction loans.
To mitigate the risk of construction lending, Peoples requires periodic site inspections by a construction loan
manager, appraiser or architect to ensure appropriate completion of the project prior to any disbursements.
Construction loans are structured to provide sufficient time to complete construction, including consideration for
weather or other variables that influence completion time, although Peoples generally requires the term to be less
than two years.
ConsumerLending
Peoples’ consumer lending activities primarily involve loans secured by automobiles, boats, recreational vehicles
and other personal property. At December 31, 2010, consumer loans comprised 8.5% of Peoples’ loan portfolio.
CONSUMER LENDING PRACTICES. Consumer loans generally involve more risk as to collectability than real estate
mortgage loans because of the type and nature of the collateral and, in certain instances, the absence of collateral.
As a result, consumer lending collections are dependent upon the borrower’s continued financial stability, and are at
more risk from adverse changes in personal circumstances. In addition, application of various state and federal
laws, including bankruptcy and insolvency laws, could limit the amount that may be recovered under these loans.
Credit approval for consumer loans typically requires demonstration of sufficiency of income to repay principal and
interest due, stability of employment, credit history and sufficient collateral for secured loans. It is the policy of
Peoples to review its consumer loan portfolio monthly and to charge-off loans that do not meet its standards, and to
adhere strictly to all laws and regulations governing consumer lending. A qualified compliance officer is
responsible for monitoring regulatory compliance performance and for advising and updating loan personnel.
Peoples makes available optional credit life insurance and accident and health insurance to all qualified
borrowers, thus reducing risk of loss when a borrower’s income is terminated or interrupted due to accident,
disability or death.
OverdraftPrivilege
Peoples grants Overdraft Privilege to qualified customers. Overdraft Privilege is a service that provides overdraft
protection to retail deposit customers by establishing an Overdraft Privilege amount. After a 30-day waiting period to
verify deposit ability, each new checking account usually receives an Overdraft Privilege amount of either $400 or $700,
based on the type of account and other parameters. Once established, customers are permitted to overdraw their
checking account at Peoples’ discretion, up to their Overdraft Privilege limit, with each item being charged Peoples’
regular overdraft fee. Customers repay the overdraft with their next deposit. Overdraft Privilege is designed to allow
Peoples to fill the void between traditional overdraft protection, such as a line of credit, and “check cashing stores”.
Under federal banking regulations, Peoples is required to obtain the consent of its customers in order to apply Overdraft
Privilege to ATM and one-time debit card transactions. While Overdraft Privilege generates fee income, Peoples
maintains an allowance for losses from checking accounts with overdrafts deemed uncollectible. This allowance, along
with the related provision and net charge-offs, is included in Peoples’ allowance for loan losses.
Investment Activities
Investment securities comprise a significant portion of Peoples’ total assets. The majority of Peoples’ investment
activities are conducted through Peoples Bank, although Peoples and its non-banking subsidiaries engage in investment
activities from time-to-time. Investment activity by Peoples Bank is subject to certain regulatory guidelines and limitations
on the types of securities eligible for purchase. As a result, the investment securities owned by Peoples Bank include
obligations of the U.S. Treasury, agencies and corporations of the U.S. government, including mortgage-backed securities,
bank eligible obligations of any state or political subdivision in the U.S. and bank eligible corporate obligations, including
private-label mortgage-backed securities. The investments owned by Peoples are comprised of common stocks issued by
various unrelated banking holding companies and tax-exempt municipal obligations. The investments owned by Peoples’
non-banking subsidiaries currently consist of tax credit funds and corporate obligations.
Peoples’ investment activities are governed internally by a written, Board-approved policy, which is administered by
Peoples’ Asset-Liability Management Committee (“ALCO”). The primary purpose of Peoples’ investment portfolio is to: (1)
employ excess funds not needed for loan demand; (2) provide a source of liquid assets to accommodate unanticipated deposit
and loan fluctuations and overall liquidity needs; (3) provide eligible securities to secure public and trust funds; and (4) earn
the maximum overall return commensurate with the investment’s risk and corporate needs. Investment strategies to achieve
these objectives are reviewed and approved by the ALCO. In its evaluation of investment strategies, the ALCO considers
various factors, including the interest rate environment, balance sheet mix, actual and anticipated loan demand, funding
6
opportunities and Peoples’ overall interest rate sensitivity. The ALCO also has much broader responsibilities, which are
discussed in the “Interest Rate Sensitivity and Liquidity” section of “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operation” included in Item 7 of in this Form 10-K.
Funding Sources
Peoples’ primary sources of funds for lending and investing activities are interest-bearing and non-interest-bearing
deposits. Cash flows from both the loan and investment portfolios, which include scheduled payments, as well as
prepayments, calls and maturities, also provide a relatively stable source of funds. Peoples also utilizes a variety of short-
term and long-term borrowings to fund asset growth and satisfy liquidity needs. Peoples’ funding sources are monitored and
managed through Peoples’ asset-liability management process, which is discussed further in the “Interest Rate Sensitivity and
Liquidity” section of “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation” included in
Item 7 of this Form 10-K.
The following is a brief description of the various sources of funds utilized by Peoples:
Deposits
Peoples obtains deposits principally from individuals and businesses within its primary market area by offering a
broad selection of deposit products to clients. Retail deposit account terms vary with respect to the minimum balance
required, the time the funds must remain on deposit and service charge schedules. Interest rates paid on specific deposit
types are determined based on (1) the interest rates offered by competitors, (2) the anticipated amount and timing of
funding needs, (3) the availability and cost of alternative sources of funding and (4) the anticipated future economic
conditions and interest rates. Retail deposits are attractive sources of funding because of their stability and relative cost
in addition to providing opportunities for Peoples to build long-term client relationships through the cross-selling of its
other products and services.
Peoples also offers its customers the ability to receive up to $30 million in FDIC insurance coverage for certificates
of deposit (“CDs”) through the Certificate of Deposit Account Registry System, or CDARS, program. Under this
program, funds from large customer deposits are placed into CDs issued by other members of the CDARS network in
increments below the FDIC insurance limits to ensure both principal and interest remain eligible for FDIC insurance.
Peoples occasionally obtains deposits from clients outside Peoples’ primary market area, generally in the form of
certificates of deposit and often through deposit brokers. These deposits are used to augment Peoples’ retail deposits to
fund loans originated to customers located outside Peoples’ primary market area, as well as provide diversity in funding
sources. While these deposits may carry slightly higher interest costs than other wholesale funds, they do not require
Peoples to secure the funds with collateral, unlike most other borrowed funds.
Additional information regarding the amounts and composition of Peoples’ deposits can be found in the “Deposits”
section of “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation” included in Item 7
of this Form 10-K and in Note 7 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
BorrowedFunds
Peoples obtains funds through a variety of short-term and long-term borrowings, which typically include advances
from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati (“FHLB”), Federal Funds purchased, advances from the Federal
Reserve Discount Window and repurchase agreements. Occasionally, Peoples obtains funds from unrelated financial
institutions in the form of loans or revolving lines of credit. Short-term borrowings are used generally to manage
Peoples’ daily liquidity needs since they typically may be repaid, in whole or part, at any time without a penalty. Long-
term borrowings provide cost-effective options for funding asset growth and satisfying capital needs, due to the variety
of pricing and maturity options available.
Additional information regarding the amounts and composition of Peoples’ borrowed funds can be found in the
“Borrowed Funds” section of “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation”
included in Item 7 of this Form 10-K and in Notes 8 and 9 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Peoples has an established statutory business trust subsidiary (PEBO Capital Trust I) that was formed for the sole
purpose of issuing preferred securities and investing the proceeds in junior subordinated debt securities of Peoples. The
trust preferred securities qualify as Tier 1 capital for regulatory capital purposes, subject to certain quantitative limits and
qualitative standards. Additional information can be found in Note 10 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
7
Competition
Peoples experiences intense competition within its primary market area due to the presence of several national, regional
and local financial institutions and other service providers, including finance companies, insurance agencies and mutual
funds. Competition within the financial service industry continues to increase as a result of mergers between, and expansion
of, financial service providers within and outside of Peoples’ primary market areas. In addition, the deregulation of the
financial services industry (see the discussion of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 in the section of this item captioned
“Supervision and Regulation-Bank Holding Company Act”) has allowed securities firms and insurance companies that have
elected to become financial holding companies to acquire commercial banks and other financial institutions, which can create
additional competitive pressure.
Peoples primarily competes based on client service, convenience and responsiveness to customer needs, available
products, rates of interest on loans and deposits, and the availability and pricing of trust, brokerage and insurance services.
However, some competitors may have greater resources and, as such, higher lending limits than Peoples, which adversely
affects Peoples’ ability to compete. Peoples’ business strategy includes the use of a “needs-based” sales and service approach
to serve customers and incentives intended to promote customers’ continued use of multiple financial products and services.
In addition, Peoples continues to emphasize the integration of traditional commercial banking products with non-traditional
financial products, such as insurance and investment products.
Peoples historically has focused on providing its full range of products and services in smaller metropolitan markets
rather than major metropolitan areas. While management believes Peoples has developed a level of expertise in serving the
financial service needs of smaller communities, Peoples’ primary market area has expanded into larger metropolitan areas,
such as central Ohio. These larger areas typically contain entrenched service providers with an existing customer base much
larger than Peoples’ initial entry position. As a result, Peoples may be forced to compete more aggressively in order to grow
its market share in these areas, which could reduce current and future profit potential from such markets.
Employees
At December 31, 2010, Peoples had 534 full-time equivalent employees.
Intellectual Property and Proprietary Rights
Peoples has registered the service marks “Peoples Bank (with logo)”, “Peoples Bancorp (with logo)”, “Peoples Financial
Advisors (with logo)”, “Connect Card”, “Peoples Bank” and “peoplesbancorp.com” with the U.S. Patent and Trademark
Office. These service marks currently have expiration dates ranging from 2014 to 2017. Peoples may renew the registrations
of service marks with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office generally for additional 10-year periods indefinitely, provided it
continues to use the service marks and files appropriate maintenance and renewal documentation with the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office at times required by the federal trademark laws and regulations.
Peoples has a proprietary interest in the Internet Domain name “pebo.com”. Internet Domain names in the U.S. and in
foreign countries are regulated, but the laws and regulations governing the Internet are continually evolving.
Supervision and Regulation
Peoples and its subsidiaries are subject to extensive supervision and regulation by federal and state agencies. The
regulation of financial holding companies and their subsidiaries is intended primarily for the protection of consumers,
depositors, borrowers, the federal deposit insurance fund and the banking system as a whole and not for the protection of
shareholders. The following is a summary of the regulatory agencies, statutes and related regulations that have, or could
have, a material impact on Peoples’ business. This discussion is qualified in its entirety by reference to such regulations and
statutes.
Dodd-FrankAct
On July 21, 2010, President Obama signed into law the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection
Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), which implements far-reaching changes across the financial regulatory landscape,
including provisions that, among other things, will:
centralize responsibility for consumer financial protection by creating a new agency, the Consumer Financial
Protection Bureau, responsible for implementing, examining and enforcing compliance with federal consumer
financial laws;
restrict the preemption of state law by federal law and disallow subsidiaries and affiliates of national banks from
availing themselves of such preemption;
8
apply the same leverage and risk-based capital requirements that apply to insured depository institutions to most
bank holding companies, which, among other things, will require Peoples to deduct, over three years beginning
January 1, 2013, all trust preferred securities from Peoples’ Tier 1 capital;
require the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”) to seek to make its capital requirements for
national banks countercyclical so that capital requirements increase in times of economic expansion and
decrease in times of economic contraction;
require financial holding companies, such as Peoples, to be well capitalized and well managed as of July 21,
2011. Bank holding companies and banks must also be both well capitalized and well managed in order to
acquire banks located outside their home state;
change the assessment base for federal deposit insurance from the amount of insured deposits to consolidated
assets less tangible capital, eliminate the ceiling on the size of the Deposit Insurance Fund and increase the floor
of the size for the Deposit Insurance Fund;
impose comprehensive regulation of the over-the-counter derivatives market, which would include certain
provisions that would effectively prohibit insured depository institutions from conducting certain derivatives
businesses within the institution itself;
require large, publicly-traded bank holding companies to create a risk committee responsible for the oversight
of enterprise risk management;
implement corporate governance revisions, including with regard to executive compensation and proxy access
by shareholders, that apply to all public companies, not just financial institutions;
make permanent the $250,000 limit for federal deposit insurance, increase the cash limit of Securities Investor
Protection Corporation protection from $100,000 to $250,000 and provide unlimited federal deposit insurance
until December 31, 2012, for non-interest-bearing demand transaction accounts at all insured depository
institutions;
repeal the federal prohibitions on the payment of interest on demand deposits, thereby permitting depository
institutions to pay interest on business transaction and other accounts;
amend the Electronic Fund Transfer Act (“EFTA”) to, among other things, give the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve Board”) the authority to establish rules regarding interchange
fees charged for electronic debit transactions by payment card issuers having assets over $10 billion and to
enforce a new statutory requirement that such fees be reasonable and proportional to the actual cost of a
transaction to the issuer; and
increase the authority of the Federal Reserve Board to examine financial holding companies and their non-bank
subsidiaries.
Many aspects of the Dodd-Frank Act are subject to rulemaking and will take effect over several years, making it
difficult to anticipate the overall financial impact on Peoples, its customers or the financial services industry more
generally. In some cases, regulatory or other governmental agencies already have taken action to comply with the Dodd-
Frank Act’s mandates, with such action discussed further in the appropriate sections below where material to Peoples’
business activities.
FinancialHoldingCompany
Peoples is a legal entity separate and distinct from its subsidiaries and affiliated companies. As a financial holding
company, Peoples is subject to regulation under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the “BHC Act”),
and to inspection, examination and supervision by the Federal Reserve Board.
The Federal Reserve Board also has extensive enforcement authority over financial holding companies. In general,
the Federal Reserve Board may initiate enforcement actions for violations of laws and regulations and unsafe or unsound
practices. The Federal Reserve Board may assess civil money penalties, issue cease and desist or removal orders and
require that a financial holding company divest subsidiaries, including subsidiary banks. Peoples is also required to file
reports and other information with the Federal Reserve Board regarding its business operations and those of its
subsidiaries.
9
SubsidiaryBank
Peoples Bank is subject to regulation and examination primarily by the OCC and secondarily by the Federal Reserve
Board and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). OCC regulations govern permissible activities, capital
requirements, dividend limitations, investments, loans and other matters. The OCC has the authority to impose sanctions
on Peoples Bank and, under certain circumstances, may place Peoples Bank into receivership.
Peoples Bank is subject to certain restrictions imposed by the Federal Reserve Act and Federal Reserve Board
regulations regarding such matters as the maintenance of reserves against deposits, extensions of credit to the financial
holding company or any of its subsidiaries, investments in the stock or other securities of the financial holding company
or its subsidiaries and the taking of such stock or securities as collateral for loans to any borrower.
Non-BankingSubsidiaries
Peoples’ non-banking subsidiaries are also subject to regulation by the Federal Reserve Board and other applicable
federal and state agencies. Peoples Insurance, as a licensed insurance agency, is subject to regulation by the Ohio
Department of Insurance and the state insurance regulatory agencies of those states where it may conduct business.
OtherRegulatoryAgencies
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (“SEC”) AND NASDAQ. Peoples is also under the jurisdiction of the SEC
and certain state securities commissions for matters relating to the offering and sale of its securities. Peoples is
subject to the disclosure and regulatory requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities
Act”), and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and the regulations
promulgated thereunder, as administered by the SEC. Peoples’ Common Shares are listed with The NASDAQ
Stock Market LLC (“NASDAQ”) under the symbol “PEBO” and Peoples is subject to the rules for NASDAQ
listed companies.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK (“FHLB”). Peoples Bank is a member of the FHLB, which provides credit to its
members in the form of advances. As a member of the FHLB, Peoples Bank must maintain an investment in
the capital stock of the FHLB in a specified amount. Upon the origination or renewal of an advance, the FHLB
is required by law to obtain and maintain a security interest in certain types of collateral. The FHLB is required
to establish standards of community investment or service that its members must maintain for continued access
to long-term advances from the FHLB. The standards take into account a member’s performance under the
Community Reinvestment Act and its record of lending to first-time homebuyers.
THE FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION /DEPOSITORY INSURANCE. The FDIC is an independent federal
agency which insures the deposits, up to prescribed statutory limits, of federally-insured banks and savings
associations and safeguards the safety and soundness of the financial institution industry. Peoples Bank’s
deposits are insured up to applicable limits by Deposit Insurance Fund of the FDIC and subject to deposit
insurance assessments to maintain the Deposit Insurance Fund.
As of the date of this Form 10-K, the FDIC utilizes a risk-based assessment system that imposes insurance
premiums based upon a four-tier risk matrix based upon a bank’s capital level and supervisory, or CAMELS,
rating. The assessment rate determined by considering such information is then applied to the amount of the
bank’s deposits to determine the bank’s insurance premiums. An increase in the assessment rate could have a
material adverse effect on the earnings of the affected insured depository institutions. On February 7, 2011, the
FDIC issued final regulations, which will become effective April 1, 2011, as required by the Dodd-Frank Act,
to change the deposit insurance assessment base from total domestic deposits to average total assets minus
average tangible equity, as well as changing the assessment system for large institutions and the assessment rate
schedule.
The FDIC may terminate insurance coverage upon a finding that an insured depository institution has
engaged in unsafe or unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition, or has violated any applicable
law, regulation, rule, order or condition enacted or imposed by the institution’s regulatory agency.
U.S. TREASURY AND SPECIAL INSPECTOR GENERAL. As a result of Peoples’ participation in the TARP Capital
Purchase Program, Peoples is also subject to the regulatory authority granted to the U.S. Treasury and the
Special Inspector General for the Troubled Assets Relief Program under the Emergency Economic Stabilization
Act of 2008 (“EESA”) and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (the “ARRA”), as discussed
below under the caption “TARP Capital Purchase Program”.
BankHoldingCompanyAct
In general, the BHC Act limits the business of bank holding companies to banking, managing or controlling banks
and other activities that the Federal Reserve Board has determined to be so closely related to banking as to be a proper
incident thereto. As a result of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 – also known as the Financial Services
10
Modernization Act of 1999 – which amended the BHC Act, bank holding companies that are financial holding
companies may engage in any activity, or acquire and retain the shares of a company engaged in any activity that is
either (1) financial in nature or incidental to such financial activity (as determined by the Federal Reserve Board in
consultation with the OCC) or (2) complementary to a financial activity, and that does not pose a substantial risk to the
safety and soundness of depository institutions or the financial system generally (as solely determined by the Federal
Reserve Board). Activities that are financial in nature include securities underwriting and dealing, insurance
underwriting and making merchant banking investments. In 2002, Peoples elected, and received approval from the
Federal Reserve Board, to become a financial holding company.
In order for a financial holding company to commence any new activity permitted by the BHC Act, or to acquire a
company engaged in any new activity permitted by the BHC Act, each insured depository institution subsidiary of the
financial holding company must have received a rating of at least “satisfactory” in its most recent examination under the
Community Reinvestment Act, which is more fully discussed in the section captioned “Community Reinvestment Act”
included later in this item. In addition, financial holding companies like Peoples are permitted to acquire companies
engaged in activities that are financial in nature and in activities that are incidental and complementary to financial
activities without prior Federal Reserve Board approval.
The BHC Act and other federal and state statutes regulate acquisitions of commercial banks. The BHC Act requires
the prior approval of the Federal Reserve Board for the direct or indirect acquisition of more than 5% of the voting
shares of a commercial bank or its parent holding company. Under the Federal Bank Merger Act, the prior approval of
the OCC is required for a national bank to merge with another bank or purchase the assets or assume the deposits of
another bank. In reviewing applications seeking approval of merger and acquisition transactions, the bank regulatory
authorities will consider, among other things, the competitive effect and public benefits of the transactions, the capital
position of the combined organization, the applicant’s performance record under the Community Reinvestment Act and
fair housing laws and the effectiveness of the subject organizations in combating money laundering activities.
Under Federal Reserve Board policy, a financial holding company is expected to act as a source of financial strength
to each subsidiary bank and to commit resources to support each subsidiary bank. Under this policy, the Federal Reserve
Board may require a financial holding company to contribute additional capital to an undercapitalized subsidiary bank
and may disapprove of the payment of dividends to the shareholders if the Federal Reserve Board believes the payment
of such dividends would be an unsafe or unsound practice.
CapitalAdequacyandPromptCorrectiveAction
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (“FDICIA”), among other things, identifies
five capital categories for insured depository institutions and requires the respective federal regulatory agencies to
implement systems for “prompt corrective action” for insured depository institutions that do not meet minimum capital
requirements within such categories. The federal regulatory agencies, including the Federal Reserve Board and the
OCC, have adopted substantially similar regulatory capital guidelines and regulations consistent with the requirements of
FDICIA, as well as established a system of prompt corrective action to resolve certain of the problems of
undercapitalized institutions. This system is based on five capital level categories for insured depository institutions:
“well capitalized”; “adequately capitalized”; “undercapitalized”; “significantly undercapitalized” and “critically
undercapitalized”.
The federal banking agencies may (or in some cases must) take certain supervisory actions depending upon a bank’s
capital level. For example, the banking agencies must appoint a receiver or conservator for a bank within 90 days after it
becomes “critically undercapitalized” unless the bank’s primary regulator determines, with the concurrence of the FDIC,
that other action would better achieve regulatory purposes. Banking operations otherwise may be significantly affected
depending on a bank’s capital category. For example, a bank that is not “well capitalized” generally is prohibited from
accepting brokered deposits and offering interest rates on deposits higher than the prevailing rate in its market, and the
holding company of any undercapitalized bank must guarantee, in part, specific aspects of the bank’s capital plan for the
plan to be acceptable.
Both Peoples and Peoples Bank are subject to risk-based capital requirements and guidelines imposed by their
respective primary regulatory agencies. These capital guidelines and regulations are based on the 1998 capital accord of
the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (the “Basel Committee”) and divide the capital of Peoples and Peoples
Bank into two tiers:
“Tier 1 capital” consists of (1) common shareholders’ equity; (2) qualifying perpetual preferred stock and trust
preferred securities (up to 25% of total Tier 1 capital); and (3) minority interests in equity accounts of
consolidated subsidiaries, less goodwill and certain other deductions including intangible assets and net
unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities.
11
“Tier 2 capital” consists primarily of allowance for loan losses and net unrealized gains on certain available-for-
sale equity securities, subject to limitations established by the guidelines, as well as any qualifying perpetual
preferred stock and trust preferred securities amounts excluded from Tier 1 capital. Tier 2 capital may also
include, among other things, certain amounts of hybrid capital instruments, mandatory convertible debt and
subordinated debt.
In addition, each asset on Peoples and Peoples Bank’s balance sheets, as well as credit equivalent amounts of certain
derivatives and off-balance sheet items, are assigned to one of several broad risk weight categories: 0%, 20%, 50%,
100% and in some cases 200%, resulting in a calculation of “total risk-weighted assets”.
Peoples and Peoples Bank are required to maintain sufficient capital to meet both a risk-based asset ratio test and
leverage ratio test. From time to time, the regulatory agencies may require Peoples and Peoples Bank to maintain capital
above these minimum levels should certain conditions exist, such as deterioration of their financial condition or growth
in assets, either actual or expected. Additional information regarding Peoples and Peoples Bank’s risk-based capital
requirements and ratios can be found in Note 17 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
In November 2007, the U.S. federal regulatory agencies adopted a definitive final rule for implementing new capital
standards – referred to as “Basel II” – which applied only to banking organizations and organizations with assets of at
least $250 billion or on-balance sheet foreign exposures of at least $10 billion. The Dodd-Frank Act requires the Federal
Reserve Board, the OCC and the FDIC to adopt regulations imposing a continuing “floor” of the Basel I-based capital
requirements in cases where any future changes in capital regulations would permit lower requirements. In December
2010, the Federal Reserve Board, the OCC and the FDIC issued a joint notice of proposed rulemaking that would
implement this requirement for banks and bank holding companies larger than Peoples Bank and Peoples.
In December 2010, the Basel Committee released its final framework for strengthening international capital and
liquidity regulation, now officially identified by the Basel Committee as “Basel III”. Basel III, when implemented by the
U.S. banking agencies and fully phased-in, will require bank holding companies and their bank subsidiaries to maintain
substantially more capital, with a greater emphasis on common equity. However, the U.S. federal regulatory agencies
are considering the extent to which Basel III principles will be applied to smaller bank holding companies and banks,
such as Peoples and Peoples Bank.
The Basel III final capital framework, among other things, (1) introduces as a new capital measure “Common Equity
Tier 1” (“CET1”); (2) specifies that Tier 1 capital consists of CET1 and “Additional Tier 1 capital” instruments meeting
specified requirements; (3) defines CET1 narrowly by requiring that most adjustments to regulatory capital measures be
made to CET1 and not to the other components of capital and (4) expands the scope of the adjustments as compared to
existing regulations, including establishing the concept of a “capital conservation buffer” and “countercyclical capital
buffer”.
The capital conservation buffer is designed to absorb losses during periods of economic stress. Banking institutions
with a ratio of CET1 to risk-weighted assets above the minimum but below the conservation buffer (or below the
combined capital conservation buffer and countercyclical capital buffer, when the latter is applied) will face constraints
on dividends, equity repurchases and compensation based on the amount of the shortfall. The implementation of the
capital conservation buffer will begin on January 1, 2016 at 0.625% and be phased in over a four-year period, increasing
by that amount on each subsequent January 1, until it reaches 2.5% on January 1, 2019.
The countercyclical capital buffer generally is to be imposed when national regulators determine that excess
aggregate credit growth becomes associated with a buildup of systemic risk. This amount would be a CET1 add-on to
the capital conservation buffer in the range of 0% to 2.5% when fully implemented – potentially resulting in total buffers
of between 2.5% and 5%.
The Basel III final framework provides for a number of new deductions from and adjustments to CET1. These
include, for example, the requirement that mortgage servicing rights, deferred tax assets dependent upon future taxable
income and significant investments in non-consolidated financial entities be deducted from CET1 to the extent that any
one such category exceeds 10% of CET1 or all such categories in the aggregate exceed 15% of CET1. Implementation
of the deductions and other adjustments to CET1 will begin on January 1, 2014, and will be phased-in over a five-year
period (20% per year).
As previously noted, the implementation of the Basel III final framework will be phased-in over the period of
January 1, 2013, to January 1, 2019. During this period, the minimum capital ratios banking institutions will be required
to maintain, including any required capital conservation buffer, will increase as follows:
12
Capital Ratio
CETI to risk-weighted assets
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets
Total capital to risk-weighted assets
Current
Amount
none
4.0%
8.0%
As of
January 1,
2013
2019
3.5%
4.5%
8.0%
7.0%
8.5%
10.5%
The U.S. banking agencies have indicated informally that they expect to propose regulations implementing Basel III
in mid-2011 with final adoption of implementing regulations in mid-2012. Notwithstanding its release of the Basel III
framework as a final framework, the Basel Committee is considering further amendments to Basel III, including the
imposition of additional capital surcharges on globally systemically important financial institutions. In addition to Basel
III, Dodd-Frank requires or permits the Federal banking agencies to adopt regulations affecting banking institutions’
capital requirements in a number of respects, including potentially more stringent capital requirements for systemically
important financial institutions. Accordingly, the regulations ultimately applicable to Peoples may be substantially
different from the Basel III final framework as published in December 2010.
CommunityReinvestmentAct
The Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 (the “CRA”) requires depository institutions to assist in meeting the
credit needs of their market areas consistent with safe and sound banking practice. Under the CRA, each depository
institution is required to help meet the credit needs of its market areas by, among other things, providing credit to low
and moderate-income individuals and communities. Depository institutions are periodically examined for compliance
with the CRA and are assigned ratings. As of December 31, 2010, the OCC’s most recent performance evaluation of
Peoples Bank resulted in an overall rating of “Outstanding”.
TARPCapitalPurchaseProgram
As discussed in more detail in Note 11 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Peoples elected to
participate in the TARP Capital Purchase Program and received $39 million of new equity capital from the U.S. Treasury
on January 30, 2009. As part of its participation in the TARP Capital Purchase Program, Peoples agreed to various
requirements and restrictions imposed on all participants in the TARP Capital Purchase Program. Among the terms of
participation was a provision that the U. S. Treasury could change the terms of participation at any time.
On February 17, 2009, President Obama signed into law the ARRA enacted by the U.S. Congress. The ARRA,
among other things, imposed certain new executive compensation and corporate expenditure limits on all current and
future recipients of funds under the TARP Capital Purchase Program, including Peoples, as long as any obligation
arising from the financial assistance provided to the recipient under the TARP Capital Purchase Program remains
outstanding, excluding any period during which the U.S. Treasury holds only warrants to purchase common stock of a
TARP participant (the “Covered Period”). On June 10, 2009, the U.S. Treasury issued an interim final rule describing
how participating institutions are to comply with the executive compensation and corporate governance standards
imposed by the EESA, as amended by the ARRA. On December 7, 2009, the U.S. Treasury published technical
amendments to the interim final rule (collectively, the interim final rule published on June 15, 2009 and the amendments
published on December 7, 2009 are referred to as the "Interim Final Rule").
The current terms of participation in the TARP Capital Purchase Program include the following:
Peoples was required to file with the SEC on Form S-3 to register for resale the Series A Preferred Shares or, in
the event the Series A Preferred Shares are deposited with a depository at the request of the U.S. Treasury,
depository shares evidencing fractional interests in the Series A Preferred Shares; the Warrant; and any
common shares issued from time to time upon exercise of the Warrant, which became effective on April 7,
2009.
As long as the Series A Preferred Shares remain outstanding, unless all accrued and unpaid dividends for all
past dividend periods on the Series A Preferred Shares are fully paid, Peoples will not be permitted to declare or
pay dividends on any Common Shares, other than dividends payable solely in common shares, any junior
preferred shares or, generally, any preferred shares ranking pari passu with the Series A Preferred Shares (other
than in the case of pari passu preferred shares, dividends on a pro rata basis with the Series A Preferred Shares),
nor will Peoples be permitted to repurchase or redeem any Common Shares or preferred shares other than the
Series A Preferred Shares.
Unless the Series A Preferred Shares have been transferred to unaffiliated third parties or redeemed in whole,
until January 20, 2012, the U.S. Treasury’s approval is required for any increase in Common Share dividends or
any share repurchases other than repurchases of the Series A Preferred Shares, repurchases of junior preferred
13
shares, or repurchases of Common Shares in connection with the administration of any employee benefit plan in
the ordinary course of business and consistent with past practice and purchases under certain other limited
circumstances specified in the Securities Purchase Agreement with the U.S. Treasury.
Peoples must comply with the U.S. Treasury’s standards for executive compensation and corporate governance
during the Covered Period. The current standards include the following:
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
compensation plans and arrangements for Senior Executive Officers (as defined in the Interim Final Rule)
must not encourage unnecessary and excessive risks that threaten the value of the financial institution;
any bonus, retention award or incentive compensation paid (or under a legally binding obligation to be
paid) to a Senior Executive Officer or any of Peoples’ next 20 most highly-compensated employees based
on materially inaccurate financial statements or other materially inaccurate performance metric criteria
must be subject to recovery, or “clawback”, by Peoples;
Peoples is prohibited from paying or accruing any bonus, retention award or incentive compensation with
respect to its five most highly-compensated employees, except for grants of long-term restricted stock that
do not fully vest during the Covered Period and do not have a value which exceeds one-third of an
employee’s total annual compensation;
severance payments to a Senior Executive Officer and the next five most highly-compensated employees,
generally referred to as “golden parachute” payments, are prohibited, except for payments for services
performed or benefits accrued;
compensation plans that encourage manipulation of reported earnings to enhance the compensation of any
employees are prohibited;
Peoples is prohibited from providing (formally or informally) “gross-ups” to a Senior Executive Officer or
any of Peoples’ next 20 most highly-compensated employees;
the U.S. Treasury may retroactively review bonuses, retention awards and other compensation previously
paid to a Senior Executive Officer or any of Peoples’ next 20 most highly-compensated employees to
determine whether such payments were inconsistent with the purposes of TARP or otherwise contrary to
the public interest;
Peoples’ compensation committee consisting of independent directors must engage in risk analysis of
compensation plans for Senior Executive Officers;
Peoples’ Board of Directors must establish a company-wide policy regarding excessive or luxury
expenditures, which was adopted on August 27, 2009, and post this policy on Peoples’ website;
Peoples’ proxy statements for annual shareholder meetings must permit a non-binding “say on pay”
shareholder vote on the compensation of executives, as disclosed pursuant to the executive compensation
disclosure rules of the SEC;
executive compensation in excess of $500,000 for each Senior Executive Officer must not be deducted for
federal income tax purposes;
Peoples must disclose to the U.S. Treasury and Peoples’ primary regulator the amount, nature and
justification for offering to any of Peoples’ five most highly-compensated employees any perquisites whose
total value exceeds $25,000;
Peoples must disclose to the U.S. Treasury and Peoples’ primary regulator whether Peoples’ Board of
Directors or the Compensation Committee engaged a compensation consultant and the services performed
by that compensation consult and any of its affiliates;
Peoples must disclose to the U.S. Treasury the identity of Peoples’ Senior Executive Officers and next 20
most highly-compensated employees, identified by name and title and ranked in descending order of annual
compensation;
Peoples must limit any Employee Compensation Plan (as defined in the Interim Final Rule) that
unnecessarily exposes Peoples to risk; and
Peoples must comply with the executive compensation reporting and recordkeeping requirements
established by the U.S. Treasury.
14
The ARRA permits such TARP recipients, subject to consultation with the appropriate federal banking agency, to
repay to the U.S. Treasury any financial assistance received under the TARP Capital Purchase Program without penalty,
delay or the need to raise additional replacement capital.
Detailed information regarding the Series A Preferred Shares and the Warrant can be found in Note 11 of the Notes
to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
DividendRestrictions
Current federal banking regulations impose restrictions on Peoples Bank’s ability to pay dividends to Peoples.
These restrictions include a limit on the amount of dividends that may be paid in a given year without prior approval of
the OCC and a prohibition on paying dividends that would cause Peoples Bank’s total capital to be less than the required
minimum levels under the risk-based capital requirements imposed by the OCC. Peoples Bank’s regulators may prohibit
the payment of dividends at any time if the regulators determine the dividends represent unsafe and/or unsound banking
practices or reduce Peoples Bank’s total capital below adequate levels. For further discussion regarding regulatory
restrictions on dividends, see Note 17 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Peoples’ ability to pay dividends to its shareholders may also be restricted. Current Federal Reserve Board policy
requires a financial holding company to act as a source of financial strength to each of its banking subsidiaries. Under
this policy, the Federal Reserve Board may require Peoples to commit resources or contribute additional capital to
Peoples Bank, which could restrict the amount of cash available for dividends. The Federal Reserve Board requires a
bank holding company to provide advance notification of, and obtain approval for, the declaration and payment of
dividends to common shareholders under certain conditions.
Peoples also has entered into certain agreements that place restrictions on dividends. Specifically, Peoples will be
prohibited from paying dividends on its Common Shares if it suspends interest payments related to the trust preferred
securities issued by its trust subsidiary. Additional information regarding Peoples’ trust subsidiary can be found in Note
10 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The dividend rights of holders of Peoples’ Common Shares
are also qualified and subject to the dividend rights of holders of Series A Preferred Shares described above under the
caption “Supervision and Regulation – TARP Capital Purchase Program”.
Even when the legal ability exists, Peoples or Peoples Bank may decide to limit the payment of dividends in order to
retain earnings for corporate use.
CustomerPrivacyandOtherConsumerProtections
Peoples Bank is subject to regulations limiting the ability of financial institutions to disclose non-public information
about consumers to nonaffiliated third parties. These limitations require disclosure of privacy policies to consumers and,
in some circumstances, allow consumers to prevent disclosure of certain personal information to a nonaffiliated party.
Peoples Bank is also subject to numerous federal and state laws aimed at protecting consumers, including the Home
Mortgage Disclosure Act, the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Truth in
Lending Act, the Bank Secrecy Act, the Community Reinvestment Act and the Fair Credit Reporting Act.
USAPatriotAct
The Uniting and Strengthening of America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct
Terrorism Act of 2001 (the “USA Patriot Act”) and related regulations, among other things, require financial institutions
to establish programs specifying procedures for obtaining identifying information from customers and establishing
enhanced due diligence policies, procedures and controls designed to detect and report suspicious activity. Peoples Bank
has established policies and procedures that Peoples believes comply with the requirements of the USA Patriot Act.
MonetaryPolicy
The Federal Reserve Board regulates money and credit conditions and interest rates in order to influence general
economic conditions primarily through open market operations in U.S. government securities, changes in the discount
rate on bank borrowings, and changes in the reserve requirements against depository institutions’ deposits. These
policies and regulations significantly affect the overall growth and distribution of loans, investments and deposits, as
well as interest rates charged on loans and paid on deposits.
The monetary policies of the Federal Reserve Board have had a significant effect on the operating results of
financial institutions in the past and are expected to continue to have significant effects in the future. In view of the
changing conditions in the economy, the money markets and the activities of monetary and fiscal authorities, Peoples can
make no definitive predictions as to future changes in interest rates, credit availability or deposit levels.
15
Website Access to Peoples’ SEC Filings
Peoples maintains an Internet website at www.peoplesbancorp.com (this uniform resource locator, or URL, is an inactive
textual reference only and is not intended to incorporate Peoples’ Internet website into this Form 10-K). Peoples makes
available free of charge on or through its website, its annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current
reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange
Act, as soon as reasonably practicable after Peoples electronically files each such report or amendment with, or furnishes it
to, the SEC.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
The following are certain risks that management believes are specific to Peoples’ business. This should not be viewed as an
all-inclusive list of risks or presenting the risk factors listed in any particular order.
Conditions in the financial markets, the real estate markets and economic conditions generally may adversely
affect Peoples’ business.
Beginning in the latter half of 2007 and continuing throughout 2010, negative developments in the capital markets
resulted in uncertainty in the financial markets and an economic downturn. Business activity across a wide range of
industries and regions decreased substantially causing the U.S. economy to be in a recession from December 2007
through June 2009. Since 2007, the general housing market also has been weak, resulting in decreased home prices and
increased delinquencies and foreclosures. These conditions caused significant write-downs of asset values by financial
institutions, including government-sponsored entities and major commercial and investment banks. These write-downs
have caused many financial institutions to seek additional capital or to merge with larger and stronger institutions. Some
financial institutions have failed.
Peoples’ financial performance generally is highly dependent upon the business environment and economic
conditions in the markets where it operates and, to a lesser extent, the U.S as a whole. The local economies of the
majority of Peoples’ market area historically have been less robust than the economy of the nation as a whole and
typically are not subject to the same fluctuations as the national economy. In general, a favorable business environment
and economic conditions are generally characterized by, among other factors, economic growth, efficient capital
markets, low inflation, low unemployment, high business and investor confidence, and strong business earnings.
Unfavorable or uncertain economic and market conditions can be caused by declines in economic growth, business
activity or investor or business confidence; limitations on the availability or increases in the cost of credit and capital;
increases in inflation or interest rates; high unemployment, natural disasters; or a combination of these or other factors.
Overall, the business environment and general economic conditions in 2010 were adverse for many households and
businesses in the U.S. and worldwide. While some economic indicators have shown improvement since late 2009, many
businesses, states and municipalities are still in serious difficulty, due to reduced cash flow and weakened financial
condition. Further, there can be no assurance this improvement will continue. A lack of a return to favorable economic
conditions in a reasonable timeframe could have an adverse affect on Peoples’ asset quality, deposit levels and loan
demand and, therefore, Peoples’ financial condition and results of operations. Because a significant amount of Peoples’
loans are secured by either commercial or residential real estate, additional decreases in real estate values could
adversely affect the value of property used as collateral and Peoples’ ability to sell the collateral upon foreclosure.
Government regulation significantly affects Peoples’ business.
The banking industry is heavily regulated under both federal and state law. Peoples is subject to regulation and
supervision by the Federal Reserve Board, and Peoples Bank is subject to regulation and supervision by the OCC, and
secondarily the FDIC. These regulations are primarily intended to protect depositors and the federal deposit insurance
fund, not Peoples’ common shareholders. Peoples’ non-bank subsidiaries are also subject to the supervision of the
Federal Reserve Board, in addition to other regulatory and self-regulatory agencies including the SEC and state securities
and insurance regulators.
The Dodd-Frank Act was signed into law on July 21, 2010. Many of its provisions have extended implementation
periods and delayed effective dates and will require extensive rulemaking by regulatory authorities as well as require
multiple studies to be conducted over the next one to two years. The Dodd-Frank Act and future regulations
implementing its provisions could have numerous adverse consequences for Peoples, including the following:
–
–
Peoples and Peoples Bank may be subject to more stringent capital and liquidity requirements;
Peoples and Peoples Bank may be subjected to new and/or higher fees paid to various regulatory entities,
including but not limited to deposit insurance premiums to the FDIC;
16
–
revenue on interchange fees may decrease as a result of the level of fees the Federal Reserve deems "reasonable
and proportional" when it establishes regulation standards on the amount of interchange fees that can be
charged to merchants for electronic debit card transactions. The Federal Reserve has proposed two alternative
fee standards and rules prohibiting network exclusivity arrangements and routing restrictions, although the fee
standard would not apply to any company that, together with its affiliates, has assets of less than $10 billion,
including Peoples. Nonetheless, smaller companies may suffer indirect consequences from such standards that
are not yet determinable;
–
Peoples may also be subject to additional regulations under the newly established Bureau of Consumer
Financial Protection, which was given broad authority to implement new consumer protection regulations.
These and other provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act may place large additional costs on Peoples, impede its growth
and place it at a competitive disadvantage.
Regulations affecting banks and financial services businesses are undergoing continuous change, and management
cannot predict the effect of those changes. Regulations and laws may be modified at any time, and new legislation may
be enacted that affects Peoples and its subsidiaries. Any modifications or new laws could adversely affect Peoples’
business. Further information about government regulation of Peoples’ business can be found under the caption
“Supervision and Regulation” in Item 1 of this Form 10-K.
Removal or reduction in stimulus activities or financial stabilization efforts by the federal government and other
agencies may significantly affect Peoples’ financial condition and results of operations.
The Federal Reserve Board, the U.S. Congress, the U.S. Treasury, the FDIC and others have taken numerous actions
to stimulate economic activity, as well as address the current liquidity and credit situation in the financial markets.
These measures include actions to encourage loan restructuring and modification for homeowners; the establishment of
significant liquidity and credit facilities for financial institutions and investment banks; the lowering of the federal funds
rate; and coordinated efforts to address liquidity and other weaknesses in the banking sector.
The long-term effect of actions already taken as well as new legislation is unknown. Continued or renewed
instability in the financial markets could weaken public confidence in financial institutions and adversely affect Peoples’
ability to attract and retain new customers. Further, the removal or reduction in any of the economic stimulus or
financial stabilization programs could cause higher market interest rates, which may have an adverse affect on Peoples’
business, earnings and financial condition.
Defaults by larger financial institutions could adversely affect Peoples’ business, earnings and financial condition.
The commercial soundness of many financial institutions may be closely interrelated as a result of relationships
between and among the institutions. As a result, concerns about, or a default or threatened default by, one institution
could lead to significant market-wide liquidity and credit problems, losses or defaults by other institutions. This
“systemic risk” may adversely affect Peoples’ business.
Additionally, Peoples’ investment portfolio continues to include investments in individual bank-issued trust
preferred securities. Under current market conditions, the fair value of these security types is based predominately on
the present value of cash flows expected to be received in future periods. Significant defaults by other financial
institutions could adversely affect conditions within the financial services industry, thereby causing investors to require
higher rates of return for these investments. These factors could cause Peoples to recognize additional impairment losses
on its investment in bank-issued trust preferred securities in future periods.
Increases in FDIC insurance premiums may have a material adverse affect on Peoples’ earnings.
The number of bank failures has increased significantly since 2007, which dramatically increased resolution costs of
the FDIC and depleted the Deposit Insurance Fund. Also during this period, the FDIC and the U.S. Congress have
instituted two programs to further insure customer deposits at FDIC-member banks: deposit accounts are now insured up
to $250,000 per customer (up from $100,000) and non-interest-bearing transactional accounts are fully insured
(unlimited coverage) until the end of 2012. These actions have placed additional stress on the Deposit Insurance Fund.
Since late 2008, the FDIC has taken various actions intended to maintain a strong funding position and restore
reserve ratios of the Deposit Insurance Fund. These actions have included increasing assessment rates for all insured
institutions, requiring riskier institutions to pay a larger share of premiums by factoring in rate adjustments based on
secured liabilities and unsecured debt levels, imposing a special assessment on all insured depository institutions for the
second quarter of 2009 and requiring insured depository institutions to prepay their quarterly risk-based assessments for
the fourth quarter of 2009 and full years 2010 through 2012 on December 29, 2009. On February 7, 2011, the FDIC
issued final regulations that will change the assessment base and assessment rate schedule for all insured depository
17
institutions effective April 1, 2011. Management does not expected these changes to have a material adverse effect on
Peoples’ future results of operations given the current structure of Peoples Bank’s balance sheet.
Peoples Bank has limited ability to control the amount of premiums it is required to pay for FDIC insurance. If
there are additional financial institution failures, the FDIC may be required to increase assessment rates or take actions
similar to those taken during 2009. As a result, insured depository institutions, including Peoples Bank, may be required
to pay even higher FDIC premiums in future periods. Increases in FDIC insurance premiums may have a material
adverse effect on Peoples’ results of operations and ability to continue to pay dividends on its common shares at the
current rate or at all.
The Series A Preferred Shares impact net income available to Peoples’ common shareholders, and the Warrant
may be dilutive to Peoples’ common shareholders.
The additional capital Peoples raised through its participation in the TARP Capital Purchase Program has provided
further funding for its lending activities. Management also believes this capital has improved investor perceptions with
regard to Peoples’ financial position. However, such capital has increased Peoples’ equity and the number of dilutive
outstanding common shares. In addition, the dividends declared and the accretion of discount on the Series A Preferred
Shares reduces the net income available to Peoples’ common shareholders and earnings per common share. The
Series A Preferred Shares will also receive preferential treatment in the event of Peoples’ liquidation, dissolution or
winding up. Additionally, the ownership interest of Peoples’ existing common shareholders will be diluted to the extent
the Warrant Peoples issued to the U.S. Treasury is exercised. Although the U.S. Treasury has agreed not to vote any of
the common shares it receives upon exercise of the Warrant, a transferee of any portion of the Warrant or of any
common shares acquired upon exercise of the Warrant is not bound by this agreement.
If Peoples is unable to fully redeem the Series A Preferred Shares after five years, the cost of this capital will
increase substantially.
If Peoples is unable to fully redeem the Series A Preferred Shares prior to February 15, 2014, the cost of this capital
will increase substantially on that date, from 5.0% per annum to 9.0% per annum. Depending on Peoples’ financial
condition at the time, this increase in the annual dividend rate on the Series A Preferred Shares could have a material
negative effect on Peoples’ liquidity.
Changes in interest rates may adversely affect Peoples’ profitability.
Peoples’ earnings are dependent to a significant degree on net interest income, which is the amount by which
interest income exceeds interest expense. Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors that are beyond Peoples’
control, including general economic conditions and policies of various governmental and regulatory agencies and, in
particular, the Federal Reserve Board. Changes in monetary policy, including changes in interest rates, could influence
not only the interest Peoples receives on loans and securities and the amount of interest it pays on deposits and
borrowings, but such changes could also affect (i) Peoples’ ability to originate loans and obtain deposits, (ii) the fair
value of Peoples’ financial assets and liabilities, and (iii) the average duration of Peoples’ mortgage-backed securities
portfolio. If the interest rates paid on deposits and other borrowings increase at a faster rate than the interest rates
received on loans and other investments, Peoples’ net interest income and, therefore, earnings could be adversely
affected. Earnings could also be adversely affected if the interest rates received on loans and other investments fall more
quickly than the interest rates paid on deposits and other borrowings.
Management uses various measures to monitor interest rate risk and believes it has implemented effective asset and
liability management strategies to reduce the potential effects of changes in interest rates on Peoples’ results of
operations. Management also periodically adjusts the mix of assets and liabilities to manage interest rate risk. However,
any substantial, unexpected, prolonged change in market interest rates could have a material adverse effect on Peoples’
financial condition and results of operations. See the sections captioned “Interest Income and Expense” and “Interest
Rate Sensitivity and Liquidity” in Item 7 of this Form 10-K for further discussion related to Peoples’ interest rate risk.
Peoples’ exposure to credit risk could adversely affect Peoples’ earnings and financial condition.
There are certain risks inherent in making loans. These risks include interest rate changes over the time period in
which loans may be repaid, risks resulting from changes in the economy, risks inherent in dealing with borrowers and, in
the case of loans secured by collateral, risks resulting from uncertainties about the future value of the collateral.
Commercial and commercial real estate loans comprise a significant portion of Peoples’ loan portfolio. Commercial
loans generally are viewed as having a higher credit risk than residential real estate or consumer loans because they
usually involve larger loan balances to a single borrower and are more susceptible to a risk of default during an economic
downturn. Since Peoples’ loan portfolio contains a significant number of commercial and commercial real estate loans,
the deterioration of one or a few of these loans could cause a significant increase in nonperforming loans, and ultimately
could have a material adverse effect on Peoples’ earnings and financial condition.
18
In deciding whether to extend credit or enter into other transactions with customers and counterparties, Peoples may
rely on information provided to us by customers and counterparties, including financial statements and other financial
information. Peoples may also rely on representations of customers and counterparties as to the accuracy and
completeness of that information and, with respect to financial statements, on reports of independent auditors. For
example, in deciding whether to extend credit to a business, Peoples may assume that the customer’s audited financial
statements conform with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“US GAAP”) and present fairly,
in all material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the customer. Peoples may also
rely on the audit report covering those financial statements. Peoples’ financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows could be negatively impacted to the extent that Peoples relies on financial statements that do not comply with US
GAAP or on financial statements and other financial information that are materially misleading.
Peoples’ allowance for loan losses may be insufficient.
Peoples maintains an allowance for loan losses to provide for probable loan losses based on management’s quarterly
analysis of the loan portfolio. The determination of the allowance for loan losses requires management to make various
assumptions and judgments about the collectibility of Peoples’ loan portfolio, including the creditworthiness of its
borrowers and the value of the real estate and other assets serving as collateral for the repayment of loans. Additional
information regarding Peoples’ allowance for loan losses methodology and the sensitivity of the estimates can be found
the discussion of Peoples’ “Critical Accounting Policies” included in Item 7 of this Form 10-K.
Peoples’ estimation of future loan losses is susceptible to changes in economic, operating and other conditions,
including changes in interest rates, which may be beyond Peoples’ control, and these losses may exceed current
estimates. Peoples cannot be assured of the amount or timing of losses nor whether the loan loss allowance will be
adequate in the future.
If Peoples’ assumptions prove to be incorrect, Peoples’ allowance for loan losses may not be sufficient to cover
losses inherent in its loan portfolio, resulting in additions which could have a material adverse impact on Peoples’
financial condition and results of operations. In addition, federal and state regulators periodically review Peoples’
allowance for loan losses as part of their examination process and may require management to increase the allowance or
recognize further loan charge-offs based on judgments different than those of management. Any increase in the
provision for loan losses would decrease Peoples’ pretax and net income.
Changes in accounting standards, policies, estimates or procedures may impact Peoples’ reported financial
condition or results of operations.
The accounting standard setters, including the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the SEC and other regulatory
bodies, periodically change the financial accounting and reporting standards that govern the preparation of Peoples’
Consolidated Financial Statements. These changes can be difficult to predict and can materially impact how Peoples
records and reports its financial condition and results of operations. In some cases, Peoples could be required to apply a
new or revised standard retroactively, resulting in the restatement of prior period financial statements.
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make
significant estimates that affect the financial statements. Due to the inherent nature of these estimates, actual results may
vary materially from management’s estimates. Additional information regarding Peoples’ critical accounting policies
and the sensitivity of estimates can be found in the section captioned “Critical Accounting Policies” in Item 7 of this
Form 10-K.
Peoples and Peoples Bank may elect or be compelled to seek additional capital in the future, but that capital may
not be available when it is needed.
Peoples and Peoples Bank are required by federal and state regulatory authorities to maintain adequate levels of
capital to support their operations. If capital requirements are raised or if Peoples Bank experiences loan losses,
additional capital may be needed. In addition, Peoples and Peoples Bank may elect to raise additional capital to support
their businesses or to finance acquisitions, if any, or for other anticipated reasons. Their ability to raise additional
capital, if needed, will depend on financial performance, conditions in the capital markets, economic conditions and a
number of other factors, many of which are outside their control. Therefore, there can be no assurance additional capital
can be raised when needed or that capital can be raised on acceptable terms. The inability to raise capital may have a
material adverse effect on Peoples’ financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
The financial services industry is very competitive.
Peoples experiences significant competition in originating loans, principally from other commercial banks, savings
associations and credit unions. Several of Peoples’ competitors have greater resources, larger branch systems and a
wider array of banking services. This competition could reduce Peoples’ net income by decreasing the number and size
of loans that Peoples originates and the interest rates it may charge on these loans. Moreover, technology and other
19
changes are allowing businesses and individuals to utilize alternative methods to complete financial transactions that
historically have involved banks. For example, consumers can now maintain funds in brokerage accounts or mutual
funds that in the past had been held as bank deposits. Consumers can also complete transactions such as paying bills
and/or transferring funds directly without the assistance of banks. The process of eliminating the use of banks to
complete financial transactions could result in the loss of fee income, as well as the loss of customer deposits and the
related income generated from those deposits. The loss of these revenue streams and lower cost deposits as a source of
funds could have a material adverse effect on Peoples’ financial condition and results of operations. For a more
complete discussion of Peoples’ competitive environment, see “Competition” in Item 1 of this Form 10-K. If Peoples is
unable to compete effectively, Peoples would lose market share, which could reduce income generated from deposits,
loans and other products.
Peoples’ ability to pay dividends is limited.
Peoples is a separate and distinct legal entity from Peoples’ subsidiaries. Peoples receives nearly all of its revenue
from dividends from Peoples Bank, which are limited by federal banking laws and regulations. These dividends also
serve as the primary source of funds to pay dividends on Peoples’ common shares. The inability of Peoples Bank to pay
sufficient dividends to Peoples could have a material, adverse effect on its business. In addition, Peoples’ participation
in the U.S. Treasury’s TARP Capital Purchase Program currently restricts the ability to increase the dividend payable to
holders of common shares above $0.23 per share without prior approval of the U.S. Treasury. Further discussion of
Peoples’ ability to pay dividends can be found under the captions “Supervision and Regulation – TARP Capital Purchase
Program” and “Supervision and Regulation – Dividend Restrictions” in Item 1 of this Form 10-K and Note 17 of the
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Peoples is subject to several restrictions on compensation paid to Peoples’ executive officers because of its
participation in the TARP Capital Purchase Program and may become subject to additional compensation
restrictions under proposed regulations.
As a recipient of government funding under the TARP Capital Purchase Program, Peoples must comply with the
executive compensation and corporate governance standards imposed by the ARRA and the standards established by the
Secretary of the Treasury under the ARRA. The restrictions on executive compensation under these standards are more
fully described in Item 1 of this Form 10-K under the caption “Supervision and Regulation – TARP Capital Purchase
Program.” In addition, the federal banking regulators have proposed regulations prohibiting incentive compensation that
exposes a financial institution to inappropriate risk because the compensation is excessive or because the compensation
encourages risks that could lead to a material financial loss. These standards and the proposed regulations, if adopted,
could impact Peoples’ ability to hire or retain key executives or cause Peoples to make material changes to its current
compensation plans and philosophy that could result in higher compensation costs in future periods.
Peoples’ business could be adversely affected by material breaches in security of its systems.
Peoples collects, processes and stores sensitive consumer data by utilizing computer systems and
telecommunications networks operated by both Peoples and third party service providers. Peoples has security and
backup and recovery systems in place, as well as a business continuity plan, to ensure the computer systems will not be
inoperable, to the extent possible. Peoples also has implemented security controls to prevent unauthorized access to the
computer systems and requires Peoples’ third party service providers to maintain similar controls. However,
management cannot be certain these measures will be successful. A security breach of the computer systems and release
of confidential information, such as customer account numbers and related information, could negatively affect
customers’ confidence in Peoples, which may cause a loss of business, and could result in Peoples’ incurring financial
losses for any fraudulent transactions completed by third parties due to the security breach.
Anti-takeover provisions may delay or prevent an acquisition or change in control by a third party.
Provisions in the Ohio General Corporation Law and Peoples’ Amended Articles of Incorporation and Code of
Regulations, including a staggered board and a supermajority vote requirement for significant corporate changes, could
discourage potential takeover attempts and make attempts by shareholders to remove Peoples’ Board of Directors and
management more difficult. These provisions may also have the effect of delaying or preventing a transaction or change
in control that might be in the best interests of Peoples’ shareholders.
Peoples and its subsidiaries are subject to examinations and challenges by tax authorities.
In the normal course of business, Peoples and its subsidiaries are routinely subject to examinations and challenges
from federal and state tax authorities regarding positions taken regarding their respective tax returns. State tax
authorities have become increasingly aggressive in challenging tax positions taken by financial institutions, especially
those positions relating to tax compliance and calculation of taxes subject to apportionment. Any challenge or
examination by a tax authority may result in adjustments to the timing or amount of taxable net worth or taxable income
or deductions or the allocation of income among tax jurisdictions.
20
Management believes it has taken appropriate positions on all tax returns filed, to be filed or not filed and does not
anticipate any examination would have a material impact on Peoples’ Consolidated Financial Statements. However, the
outcome of such examinations and ultimate resolution of any resulting assessments are inherently difficult to predict.
Thus, no assurance can be given that Peoples’ tax liability for any tax year open to examination will not be different than
what is reflected in Peoples’ current and historical Consolidated Financial Statements. Further information can be found
in the “Critical Accounting Policies – Income Taxes” section of “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of
Operation and Financial Condition” included in this Form 10-K.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Peoples’ sole banking subsidiary, Peoples Bank, generally owns its offices, related facilities and unimproved real
property. In Ohio, Peoples Bank operates offices in Marietta (4 offices), Belpre (2 offices), Lowell, Reno, Nelsonville,
Athens (3 offices), The Plains, Middleport, Pomeroy (2 offices), Gallipolis, Cambridge (2 offices), Byesville, Quaker City,
Flushing, Caldwell, McConnelsville, Baltimore, Carroll, Lancaster (2 offices), Westerville and Zanesville. In West Virginia,
Peoples Bank operates offices in Huntington (2 offices), Parkersburg (3 offices), Vienna, Point Pleasant (2 offices), New
Martinsville (2 offices) and Steelton. In Kentucky, Peoples Bank’s office locations include Greenup, Summit, Ashland and
Russell. Of these 45 offices, 15 are leased and the rest are owned by Peoples Bank.
Peoples Insurance Agency rents office space in various Peoples Bank offices. In addition, Peoples Insurance Agency
leases office buildings in Marietta, Ohio, and Ashland, Kentucky.
Rent expense on the leased properties totaled $911,000 in 2010, which excludes intercompany rent expense. The
following are the only properties that have a lease term expiring on or before June 2012:
Location
Marietta Kroger Office
The Plains
Athens Mall
Address
40 Acme Street
Marietta, Ohio
70 N. Plains Road
The Plains, Ohio
801 East State Street
Athens, Ohio
Lease Expiration Date (a)
March 2011
December 2011
June 2012
(a) Information represents the ending date of the current lease period. Peoples may have the option to renew the lease
beyond this date under the terms of the lease agreement and intends to renew all expiring leases unless otherwise
disclosed in this Item 2.
Additional information concerning the property and equipment owned or leased by Peoples and its subsidiaries is
incorporated herein by reference from Note 5 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
In the ordinary course of their respective businesses or operations, Peoples or one of its subsidiaries may be named as a
plaintiff, a defendant, or a party to a legal proceeding or any of their respective properties may be subject to various pending
and threatened legal proceedings and various actual and potential claims. In view of the inherent difficulty of predicting the
outcome of such matters, Peoples cannot state what the eventual outcome of any such matters will be; however, based on
current knowledge and after consultation with legal counsel, management believes that these proceedings will not have a
material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity of Peoples.
ITEM 4. [Reserved]
21
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Peoples’ common shares are traded on The NASDAQ Global Select Market® under the symbol PEBO. At December 31,
2010, Peoples had 1,163 shareholders of record. The table presented below provides the high and low sales prices for
Peoples’ common shares as reported on The NASDAQ Global Select Market® and the cash dividends per share declared for
the indicated periods.
2010
Fourth Quarter
Third Quarter
Second Quarter
First Quarter
2009
Fourth Quarter
Third Quarter
Second Quarter
First Quarter
High Sales
Low Sales
Dividends
Declared
$
$
16.98
17.60
19.02
17.72
13.52
18.70
19.01
19.92
$
$
11.54
11.13
12.82
9.25
8.51
13.05
12.25
7.25
$
$
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.23
0.23
Peoples plans to continue to pay quarterly cash dividends, subject to certain regulatory restrictions described in Note 17
of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, as well as in the sections captioned “Supervision and Regulation-
TARP Capital Purchase Program” and “Supervision and Regulation-Dividend Restrictions” of Item 1 of this Form 10-K. On
January 28, 2010, Peoples’ Board of Directors determined that, effective with the first calendar quarter of 2010, the decision
as to whether a cash dividend should be declared in respect of Peoples’ common shares would be made in the third month of
each calendar quarter. Any dividends so declared would be paid to shareholders in the subsequent month. Historically,
Peoples’ Board of Directors had declared a cash dividend in respect of Peoples’ common shares, when appropriate, in the
second month of each calendar quarter.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The following table details Peoples’ repurchases and purchases by “affiliated purchasers” as defined in Rule 10b-
18(a)(3) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, of Peoples’ common shares during the three months ended
December 31, 2010:
(a)
Total Number
of Common
Shares
Purchased
(b)
Average Price
Paid per
Common
Share
(c)
Total Number of
Common Shares
Purchased as Part
of Publicly
Announced Plans
or Programs (1)
(d)
Maximum
Number of
Common Shares
that May Yet Be
Purchased Under
the Plans or
Programs (1)
October 1 – 31, 2010
November 1 – 30, 2010
December 1 – 31, 2010
Total
1,740 (2)
450 (2)
501 (2)
2,691
$
$
$
$
12.68 (2)
13.32 (2)
15.96 (2)
13.40
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
(1) Peoples’ Board of Directors did not authorize any stock repurchase plans or programs for 2010, due to the restrictions on
stock repurchases imposed by the terms of the TARP Capital Investment.
(2) Information reflects solely common shares purchased in open market transactions by Peoples Bank under the Rabbi Trust
Agreement establishing a rabbi trust holding assets to provide funds for the payment of the benefits under the Peoples
22
Bancorp Inc. Second Amended and Restated Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors of Peoples Bancorp Inc. and
Subsidiaries.
Performance Graph
The following Performance Graph and related information shall not be deemed “soliciting material” or to be “filed”
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, nor shall such information be deemed to be incorporated by reference into
any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each as amended, except to the
extent that Peoples specifically incorporates the Performance Graph by reference into such filing.
The following line graph compares the five-year cumulative total shareholder return of Peoples’ common shares, based
on an initial investment of $100 on December 31, 2005, and assuming reinvestment of dividends, against that of an index
comprised of all domestic common shares traded on The NASDAQ Stock Market (“NASDAQ Stocks (U.S. Companies)”),
and an index comprised of all depository institutions (SIC Code #602) and depository institution holding companies (SIC
Code #671) that are traded on The NASDAQ Stock Market (“NASDAQ Bank Stocks”).
COMPARISON OF FIVE-YEAR TOTAL RETURN AMONG
PEOPLES BANCORP INC., NASDAQ STOCKS (U.S. COMPANIES),
AND NASDAQ BANK STOCKS
$145
$130
$115
$100
$85
$70
$55
$40
$25
12/31/05
12/31/06
12/31/07
12/31/08
12/31/09
12/31/10
Peoples Bancorp Inc.
NASDAQ Stocks (U.S. Companies)
NASDAQ Bank Stocks
Peoples Bancorp Inc.
NASDAQ Stocks (U.S. Companies)
NASDAQ Bank Stocks
2005
$100.00
$100.00
$100.00
2006
$107.04
$109.84
$112.23
At December 31,
2007
2008
$ 74.48
$ 92.77
$ 57.41
$119.14
$ 64.86
$ 88.95
2009
$ 39.54
$ 82.53
$ 54.35
2010
$ 65.70
$ 97.95
$ 64.29
23
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The information below has been derived from Peoples’ Consolidated Financial Statements.
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Operating Data
Total interest income
Total interest expense
Net interest income
Provision for loan losses
Net impairment loss on investment securities
Net (loss) gain on securities and asset transactions
Total non-interest income
FDIC insurance expense
Other non-interest expense
Preferred dividends (1)
Net income available to common shareholders
Balance Sheet Data
Total assets
Investment securities
Gross loans
Allowance for loan losses
Total intangible assets
Non-interest-bearing deposits
Retail interest-bearing deposits
Brokered deposits
Short-term borrowings
Long-term borrowings
Junior subordinated notes held by subsidiary trusts
Preferred stockholders' equity (1)
Common stockholders' equity
Tangible assets (2)
Tangible common equity (2)
2010
At or For the Year Ended December 31,
2008
2007
2009
$
$
89,335 $
29,433
59,902
26,916
(1,786)
(39)
31,634
2,470
54,572
2,052
3,529 $
102,105 $
40,262
61,843
25,721
(7,707)
1,343
32,050
3,442
55,240
1,876
2,314 $
106,227 $
47,748
58,479
27,640
(4,260)
2,424
32,097
361
53,124
–
7,455 $
113,419 $
59,498
53,921
3,959
(6,170)
184
31,350
146
51,306
–
18,314 $
2006
108,794
55,577
53,217
3,622
–
746
30,379
143
51,154
–
21,558
$ 1,837,985 $ 2,001,827 $ 2,002,338 $ 1,885,553 $ 1,875,255
548,733
1,132,394
14,509
68,852
170,921
933,480
129,128
194,883
200,793
29,412
–
197,169
1,806,403
128,317
641,307
960,718
26,766
64,870
215,069
1,059,066
87,465
51,509
157,703
22,565
38,645
192,036
1,773,115
751,866
1,052,058
27,257
65,599
198,000
1,095,466
102,420
76,921
246,113
22,530
38,543
205,425
1,936,228
708,753
1,104,032
22,931
66,406
180,040
1,034,418
151,910
98,852
308,297
22,495
–
186,626
1,935,932
565,463
1,120,941
15,718
68,029
175,057
951,731
59,589
222,541
231,979
22,460
–
202,836
1,817,524
139,826 $
134,807 $
127,166 $
120,220 $
$
Per Share Data
Earnings per common share – Basic
Earnings per common share – Diluted
Cash dividends paid on common shares
Book value at end of period
Tangible book value at end of period (2)
Weighted-average common shares outstanding - Basic
Weighted-average common shares outstanding - Diluted
Common shares outstanding at end of period
$
$
0.34 $
0.34
0.40
18.36
12.16 $
0.22 $
0.22
0.66
19.80
13.48 $
0.72 $
0.72
0.91
18.06
11.63 $
1.75 $
1.74
0.88
19.70
13.09 $
10,424,474
10,431,990
10,457,327
10,363,975
10,374,792
10,374,637
10,315,263
10,348,579
10,333,884
10,462,933
10,529,634
10,296,748
2.03
2.01
0.83
18.51
12.05
10,606,570
10,723,933
10,651,985
24
Significant Ratios
Return on average assets
Return on average common stockholders’ equity
Net interest margin
Efficiency ratio
Dividend payout ratio
Average stockholders’ equity to average assets
Average loans to average deposits
Asset Quality
Allowance for loan losses to total loans
Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans
Nonperforming loans to total loans
Nonperforming assets to total assets
Nonperforming assets to total
loans and other real estate owned
Net charge-offs to average loans
Provision for loan losses to average loans
Capital Information
Tier 1 capital ratio
Tier 1 common ratio
Total risk-based capital ratio
Leverage ratio
Tangible common equity to tangible assets (2)
2010
0.28%
1.76
3.51
60.30
119.33
12.20
73.01%
2.79%
66.1
4.19
2.45
4.64
2.66
2.61%
16.91%
11.59
18.24
10.63
7.17%
At or For the Year Ended December 31,
2008
2007
2009
0.21%
1.17
3.48
60.14
298.23
11.50
77.97%
2.59%
79.3
3.27
2.03
3.85
1.96
2.35%
15.49%
10.58
16.80
10.06
7.22%
0.39%
3.67
3.51
56.30
127.03
10.62
88.10%
2.08%
55.5
3.74
2.09
3.79
1.83
2.48%
11.88%
10.17
13.19
8.18
6.21%
0.98%
9.21
3.32
57.07
50.38
10.62
93.52%
1.40%
168.0
0.83
0.51
0.87
0.25
0.35%
11.91%
10.18
13.23
8.48
7.42%
2006
1.15%
11.33
3.29
57.51
41.09
10.18
94.80%
1.28%
145.0
0.88
0.53
0.88
0.35
0.33%
11.98%
9.80
13.17
8.90
7.10%
(1) Amounts relate to preferred shares issued and sold by Peoples in connection with its participation in the TARP Capital Purchase
Program. Additional information regarding the preferred shares can be found in Note 11 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
(2) These amounts represent non-GAAP measures since they exclude the balance sheet impact of intangible assets acquired through
acquisitions on both total stockholders’ equity and total assets. Additional information regarding the calculation of these measures can
be found later in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis section under the caption “Capital/Stockholders’ Equity”.
25
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements in this Form 10-K which are not historical fact are forward-looking statements within the meaning
of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Words such as “anticipate”, “estimates”, “may”,
“feels”, “expects”, “believes”, “plans”, “will”, “would”, “should”, “could” and similar expressions are intended to identify
these forward-looking statements but are not the exclusive means of identifying such statements. Forward-looking
statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially. Factors that might cause
such a difference include, but are not limited to:
(1) continued deterioration in the credit quality of Peoples’ loan portfolio could occur due to a number of factors, such
as adverse changes in economic conditions that impair the ability of borrowers to repay their loans, the underlying
value of the collateral could prove less valuable than otherwise assumed and assumed cash flows may be worse
than expected, which may adversely impact the provision for loan losses;
(2) competitive pressures among financial institutions or from non-financial institutions, which may increase
significantly;
(3) changes in the interest rate environment, which may adversely impact interest margins;
(4) changes in prepayment speeds, loan originations, sale volumes and charge-offs, which may be less favorable than
expected and adversely impact the amount of interest income generated;
(5) general economic conditions and weakening in the real estate market, either nationally or in the states in which
Peoples and its subsidiaries do business, which may be less favorable than expected;
(6) political developments, wars or other hostilities, which may disrupt or increase volatility in securities markets or
other economic conditions;
(7) legislative or regulatory changes or actions, which may adversely affect the business of Peoples and its subsidiaries;
(8) changes in accounting standards, policies, estimates or procedures may adversely affect Peoples’ reported financial
condition or results of operations;
(9) adverse changes in the conditions and trends in the financial markets, which may adversely affect the fair value of
securities within Peoples’ investment portfolio;
(10) a delayed or incomplete resolution of regulatory issues that could arise;
(11) Peoples’ ability to receive dividends from its subsidiaries;
(12) Peoples’ ability to maintain required capital levels and adequate sources of funding and liquidity;
(13) the impact of larger or similar financial institutions encountering problems, which may adversely affect the banking
industry and/or Peoples;
(14) the impact of reputational risk created by these developments on such matters as business generation and retention,
funding and liquidity;
(15) the costs and effects of regulatory and legal developments, including the outcome of regulatory or other
governmental inquiries and legal proceedings and results of regulatory examinations; and
(16) other risk factors relating to the banking industry or Peoples as detailed from time to time in Peoples’ reports filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), including those risk factors included in the disclosure
under the heading “ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS” of this Form 10-K.
All forward-looking statements speak only as of the filing date of this Form 10-K and are expressly qualified in their
entirety by the cautionary statements. Although management believes the expectations in these forward-looking statements
are based on reasonable assumptions within the bounds of management’s knowledge of Peoples’ business and operations, it
is possible that actual results may differ materially from these projections. Additionally, Peoples undertakes no obligation
to update these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the filing date of this Form 10-K or to
reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events except as may be required by applicable legal requirements. Copies of
documents filed with the SEC are available free of charge at the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov and/or from Peoples
Bancorp’s website.
The following discussion and analysis of Peoples’ Consolidated Financial Statements is presented to provide insight
into management's assessment of the financial results. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the
audited Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto, as well as the ratios and statistics, contained elsewhere in this
Form 10-K.
26
Summary of Recent Transactions and Events
The following is a summary of recent transactions or events that have impacted or are expected to impact Peoples’
results of operations or financial condition:
As described in Note 11 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, on January 30, 2009, Peoples
received $39.0 million of new equity capital from the U.S. Treasury’s TARP Capital Purchase Program. The
investment was in the form of newly-issued non-voting cumulative perpetual preferred shares and a related 10-year
warrant to purchase common shares sold by Peoples to the U.S. Treasury (the “TARP Capital Investment”). On
February 2, 2011, Peoples completed a partial redemption of the Tarp Capital Investment by repurchasing $21.0
million of the preferred shares held by the U.S. Treasury (the "Partial TARP Capital Redemption").
Since 2008, Peoples periodically has taken actions to reduce interest rate exposures within the investment portfolio
and entire balance sheet. This strategic focus has involved the sale of low yielding investment securities from time-
to-time, with the proceeds being either reinvested into other securities with lower interest rate risk or used to repay
high-cost borrowings and deleverage the balance sheet. As a result, Peoples recognized net pre-tax gains of $6.8
million in 2010, $1.4 million in 2009 and $1.7 million in 2008. The majority of the net gain in 2010 was
attributable to Peoples selling $86.6 million of investment securities, primarily U.S. agency mortgage-backed
securities and U.S. government-backed student loan pools, in the third quarter at a $3.8 million net gain. The
proceeds from these sales of investment securities were used to prepay $60.0 million of wholesale repurchase
agreements, resulting in early repayment charges totaling $3.6 million. The repurchase agreements had a weighted-
average cost of 4.53% and originally were scheduled to mature in either 2011 or 2012.
Peoples has recognized other-than-temporary impairment ("OTTI") losses in each of the past three years, which
related primarily to Peoples’ investments in collateralized debt obligation (“CDO”) securities and individual bank-
issued trust preferred securities. These impairment losses totaled $1.8 million in 2010, $7.7 million in 2009 and
$4.3 million in 2008 and were based upon management's evaluation of the issuers and estimation of cash flows to
be received from the securities. As a result of the OTTI losses recognized in 2010, Peoples no longer has any
exposure to CDO securities within its investment portfolio.
Since early 2008, Peoples’ loan quality has been negatively impacted by worsening conditions within the
commercial real estate market and economy as a whole, which has caused declines in commercial real estate values
and deterioration in the financial condition of various commercial borrowers. These conditions led to Peoples
downgrading the loan quality ratings on various commercial real estate loans through its normal loan review
process. In addition, several impaired loans have become under-collateralized due to reductions in the estimated net
realizable fair value of the underlying collateral. As a result, Peoples’ provision for loan losses, net charge-offs and
nonperforming loans in 2008, 2009 and 2010 were significantly higher than historical levels. Peoples also
recognized losses on other real estate owned (“OREO”) totaling $1.8 million in 2010 attributable to declining
commercial real estate values.
Peoples’ earnings also have been impacted by ongoing workout efforts related to existing impaired commercial real
estate loans. These efforts have included negotiating reduced payoff amounts in connection with the sale of the
underlying collateral – commonly referred to as “short sales” – which resulted in additional loan charge-offs and
provision for loan losses. Peoples also took steps to sell three commercial loans involving a common borrower and
secured by real estate outside Peoples’ primary market area, resulting in the loans being re-classified to “held-for-
sale”. Management believes these workout efforts are prudent since they afford opportunities to reduce
nonperforming assets and manage loss exposures within the loan portfolio.
During 2009, the Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) took steps to rebuild
the Deposit Insurance Fund, which had been reduced substantially by the higher rate of bank failures in 2008 and
2009 compared to prior years. These actions affected all FDIC-insured depository institutions and included
increasing base assessment rates beginning April 1, 2009, imposing a one-time special assessment during the
second quarter of 2009, and requiring the prepayment of assessments for fourth quarter 2009 and full years 2010
through 2012 on December 29, 2009. As a result of the FDIC’s actions, Peoples recorded FDIC insurance expense
of $2.5 million in 2010, $3.4 million in 2009, of which $930,000 related to the special assessment, and $361,000 in
2008. Additionally, Peoples prepaid $9.0 million of FDIC assessments on December 29, 2009, which was recorded
as a prepaid expense included in “Other Assets” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, and subsequently amortized
as FDIC insurance expense based upon actual insurance assessments. This prepayment did not have a material
adverse effect on Peoples’ liquidity, financial condition or results of operations.
Peoples’ Board of Directors declared quarterly cash dividends of $0.10 per common share for the final two quarters
of 2009 and all of 2010. These dividends represented a reduction from the $0.23 per common share paid in the first
27
two quarters of 2009. Management believes the lower dividend rate balances the need for Peoples to maintain a
dividend payout consistent with recent earnings levels and long-term capital needs while also providing a return on
shareholder investment.
Peoples' net interest income and margin are impacted by changes in market interest rates based upon actions taken
by the Federal Reserve either directly or through its Open Market Committee. Between August 2007 and December
2008, the Federal Reserve reduced the target Federal Funds rate 500 basis points to a range of 0% to 0.25% and
reduced the Discount Rate 575 basis points to 0.50%. These actions caused a corresponding downward shift in
short-term market interest rates. In 2009, the Federal Reserve maintained the target Federal Funds Rate and
Discount Rate at their historically low levels of 0% to 0.25% and 0.50%, respectively. In February 2010, the
Federal Reserve increased the Discount Rate by 25 basis points to 0.75% while leaving its target Federal Funds
Rate range unchanged, thereby widening the spread between the Discount Rate and the high end of the target
Federal Funds Rate.
In late 2008, the Federal Reserve initiated a plan to buy mortgage-backed and other debt securities through its open
market operations as a means of lowering longer-term market interest rates and stimulating the economy – a policy
commonly referred to as “quantitative easing”. The resulting purchases caused a flattening of the yield curve in the
first half of 2009. The yield curve steepened moderately in the second half of 2009 after the Federal Reserve halted
its investment purchases. In mid-2010, the Federal Reserve signaled the possibility of additional quantitative
easing, which resulted in a flatter yield curve during much of the second half of 2010. In late 2010, the yield curve
steepened after the Federal Reserve announced its plan to purchase U.S. Treasury securities with shorter maturities
than anticipated by many market participants.
The impact of these transactions or events, where significant, is discussed in the applicable sections of this
Management’s Discussion and Analysis.
Critical Accounting Policies
The accounting and reporting policies of Peoples conform to generally accepted accounting principles in the United
States of America (“US GAAP”) and to general practices within the financial services industry. A summary of significant
accounting policies is contained in Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. While all of these
policies are important to understanding the Consolidated Financial Statements, certain accounting policies require
management to exercise judgment and make estimates or assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated
financial statements and accompanying notes. These estimates and assumptions are based on information available as of
the date of the consolidated financial statements; accordingly, as this information changes, the consolidated financial
statements could reflect different estimates or assumptions.
Management has identified the accounting policies described below as those that, due to the judgments, estimates and
assumptions inherent in the policies, are critical to an understanding of Peoples’ Consolidated Financial Statements and
management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations.
IncomeRecognition
Interest income on loans and investment securities is recognized by methods that result in level rates of return on
principal amounts outstanding, including yield adjustments resulting from the amortization of loan costs and premiums
on investment securities and accretion of loan fees and discounts on investment securities. Since mortgage-backed
securities comprise a sizable portion of Peoples’ investment portfolio, a significant increase in principal payments on
those securities could impact interest income due to the corresponding acceleration of premium amortization or
discount accretion.
Peoples discontinues the accrual of interest on a loan when conditions cause management to believe collection of
all or any portion of the loan’s contractual interest is doubtful. Such conditions may include the borrower being 90
days or more past due on any contractual payments or current information regarding the borrower’s financial condition
and repayment ability. All unpaid accrued interest deemed uncollectible is reversed, which would reduce Peoples’ net
interest income. Interest received on nonaccrual loans is included in income only if principal recovery is reasonably
assured.
AllowanceforLoanLosses
In general, determining the amount of the allowance for loan losses requires significant judgment and the use of
estimates by management. Peoples maintains an allowance for loan losses based on a quarterly analysis of the loan
portfolio and estimation of the losses that are probable of occurrence within the loan portfolio. This formal analysis
determines an appropriate level and allocation of the allowance for loan losses among loan types and resulting
provision for loan losses by considering factors affecting losses, including specific losses, levels and trends in impaired
28
and nonperforming loans, historical loan loss experience, current national and local economic conditions, volume,
growth and composition of the portfolio, regulatory guidance and other relevant factors. Management continually
monitors the loan portfolio through Peoples Bank’s Loan Review Department and Loan Loss Committee to evaluate
the adequacy of the allowance. The provision could increase or decrease each quarter based upon the results of
management’s formal analysis.
The amount of the allowance for loan losses for the various loan types represents management’s estimate of
probable losses from existing loans. Management evaluates lending relationships deemed to be impaired on an
individual basis and makes specific allocations of the allowance for loan losses for each relationship based on
discounted cash flows using the loan’s initial effective interest rate or the fair value of the collateral for certain
collateral dependent loans. For all other loans, management evaluates pools of homogeneous loans (such as residential
mortgage loans and consumer loans) and makes general allocations for each loan pool based upon historical loss
experience. While allocations are made to specific loans and pools of loans, the allowance is available for all loan
losses.
This evaluation of individual impaired loans requires management to make estimates of the amounts and timing of
future cash flows on impaired loans, which consist primarily of loans placed on nonaccrual status, restructured or
internally classified as substandard or doubtful. These reviews are based upon specific quantitative and qualitative
criteria, including the size of the loan, the loan cash flow characteristics, loan quality ratings, value of collateral,
repayment ability of borrowers, and historical experience factors. Allowances for homogeneous loans are evaluated
based upon historical loss experience, adjusted for qualitative risk factors, such as trends in losses and delinquencies,
growth of loans in particular markets, and known changes in economic conditions in each lending market. As part of
the process of identifying the pools of homogenous loans, management takes into account any concentrations of risk
within any portfolio segment, including any significant industrial concentrations. Consistent with the evaluation of
allowances for homogenous loans, the allowance relating to the Overdraft Privilege program is based upon
management’s monthly analysis of accounts in the program. This analysis considers factors that could affect losses on
existing accounts, including historical loss experience and length of overdraft.
There can be no assurance the allowance for loan losses will be adequate to cover all losses, but management
believes the allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2010, was adequate to provide for probable losses from existing
loans based on information currently available. While management uses available information to estimate losses, the
ultimate collectibility of a substantial portion of the loan portfolio, and the need for future additions to the allowance,
will be based on changes in economic conditions and other relevant factors. As such, adverse changes in economic
activity could reduce currently estimated cash flows for both commercial and individual borrowers, which would likely
cause Peoples to experience increases in problem assets, delinquencies and losses on loans in the future.
InvestmentSecurities
Peoples’ investment portfolio accounted for 35% of total assets at December 31, 2010, of which approximately
96% were classified as available-for-sale. Correspondingly, Peoples carries these securities at fair value on its
Consolidated Balance Sheets, with any unrealized gain or loss recorded in stockholders’ equity as a component of
accumulated other comprehensive income. As a result, both the investment and equity sections of Peoples’
Consolidated Balance Sheet are sensitive to changes in the overall market value of the investment portfolio, due to
changes in market interest rates, investor confidence and other factors affecting market values.
While temporary changes in the fair value of available-for-sale securities are not recognized in earnings, Peoples is
required to evaluate all investment securities with an unrealized loss on a quarterly basis to identify potential other-
than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) losses. This analysis requires management to consider various factors that
involve judgment and estimation, including duration and magnitude of the decline in value, the financial condition of
the issuer or pool of issuers and structure of the security.
In early 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an accounting pronouncement that
modified the general standards of accounting for OTTI losses. Prior to this pronouncement, if Peoples determined a
loss to be “other-than-temporary”, then an impairment loss was recognized in earnings equal to the entire difference
between the investment’s amortized cost basis and its fair value at the balance sheet date. Under the new standards
adopted by Peoples in the second quarter of 2009, an OTTI loss is recognized in earnings only when (1) Peoples
intends to sell the debt security; (2) it is more likely than not that Peoples will be required to sell the security before
recovery of its amortized cost basis or (3) Peoples does not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the
security. In situations where Peoples intends to sell or when it is more likely than not that Peoples will be required to
sell the security, the entire OTTI loss must be recognized in earnings. In all other situations, only the portion of the
OTTI losses representing the credit loss must be recognized in earnings, with the remaining portion being recognized
in stockholders’ equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of deferred taxes.
29
Additional information regarding impairment losses recognized can be found later in this discussion under the
caption “Net Impairment Losses”.
GoodwillandOtherIntangibleAssets
In prior years, Peoples recorded goodwill and other intangible assets as a result of acquisitions accounted for under
the purchase method of accounting. Under the purchase method, Peoples is required to allocate the cost of an acquired
company to the assets acquired, including identified intangible assets, and liabilities assumed based on their estimated
fair values at the date of acquisition. Goodwill represents the excess cost over the fair value of net assets acquired and
is not amortized but is tested for impairment when indicators of impairment exist, or at least annually. Peoples’ other
intangible assets consist of customer relationship intangible assets, primarily core deposit intangibles, representing the
present value of future net income to be earned from acquired customer relationships with definite useful lives, which
are required to be amortized over their estimated useful lives.
The value of recorded goodwill is supported ultimately by revenue that is driven by the volume of business
transacted and Peoples’ ability to provide quality, cost-effective services in a competitive market place. A decline in
earnings as a result of a lack of growth or the inability to deliver cost-effective services over sustained periods can lead
to impairment of goodwill that could adversely impact earnings in future periods. Potential goodwill impairment exists
when the fair value of the reporting unit (as defined by US GAAP) is less than its carrying value. An impairment loss
is recognized in earnings only when the carrying amount of goodwill is less than its implied fair value.
Peoples performs its required annual impairment test as of June 30 each year. Management concluded no
impairment existed at June 30, 2010, since the fair value of Peoples’ single reporting unit exceeded its carrying value.
Peoples is required to perform interim tests for goodwill impairment in subsequent quarters if events occur or
circumstances change that indicate potential goodwill impairment exists, such as adverse changes to Peoples’ business
or a significant decline in Peoples’ market capitalization.
In the second half of 2010, Peoples' provisions for loan losses remained elevated, as a result of continued
weakness in commercial real estate values which resulted in additional losses on portfolio loans, other real estate
owned and loans held-for-sale. Additionally, Peoples’ market capitalization during the second half of 2010 remained
less than its book value. Management believed these conditions were indicators of potential goodwill impairment and
performed interim impairment tests as of September 30, and December 31, 2010. Based on its analyses, management
concluded the estimated fair value of Peoples' single reporting unit exceeded its carrying amount, although the excess
was not significant enough to provide management with a reasonable basis on which to conclude further evaluation
was not necessary. Consequently, management performed additional analyses to estimate the fair value of goodwill
and concluded no goodwill was impair since the estimated fair value of goodwill exceeded its carrying value.
Management’s analysis indicated that a decline in the fair value of Peoples’ single reporting unit of 24% or more
would result in goodwill impairment as of December 31, 2010.
The significant assumptions made by management in estimating the reporting unit’s fair value were (1) level of
future cash flows over the next five years, (2) long-term growth rate of cash flows after year five and (3) the discount
rate. Management’s analysis at year-end 2010 indicated a 25% sustained decline in future cash flows or a 40 basis
point increase in the discount rate would cause the implied fair value of goodwill to equal its carrying value.
Peoples records mortgage servicing rights (“MSRs”) in connection with its mortgage banking activities, which are
intangible assets representing the right to service loans sold to third party investors. These intangible assets are
recorded initially at fair value and subsequently amortized over the estimated life of the loans sold. MSRs are stratified
based on their predominant risk characteristics and assessed for impairment at the strata level at each reporting date
based on their fair value. At December 31, 2010, management concluded no portion of the recorded MSRs was
impaired since the fair value exceeded the carrying value. However, future events, such as a significant increase in
prepayment speeds, could result in a fair value that is less than the carrying amount, which would require the
recognition of an impairment loss in earnings.
IncomeTaxes
Income taxes are recorded based on the liability method of accounting, which includes the recognition of deferred
tax assets and liabilities for the temporary differences between carrying amounts and tax bases of assets and liabilities,
computed using enacted tax rates. In general, Peoples records deferred tax assets when the event giving rise to the tax
benefit has been recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements.
A valuation allowance is recognized to reduce any deferred tax asset that, based upon available information, it is
more-likely-than-not all, or any portion, of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. Assessing the need for, and
amount of, a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets requires significant judgment and analysis of evidence
regarding realization of the deferred tax assets. In most cases, the realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon
30
Peoples generating a sufficient level of taxable income in future periods, which can be difficult to predict. Peoples’
largest deferred tax assets involve differences related to Peoples’ allowance for loan losses and realization of income
tax credits received from Peoples’ investments in low-income housing projects and funds. Given the nature of
Peoples’ deferred tax assets, management determined no valuation allowances were needed at either December 31,
2010 or 2009.
The calculation of tax liabilities is complex and requires the use of estimates and judgment since it involves the
application of complex tax laws that are subject to different interpretations by Peoples and the various tax authorities.
These interpretations are subject to challenge by the tax authorities upon audit or to reinterpretation based on
management’s ongoing assessment of facts and evolving case law.
From time-to-time and in the ordinary course of business, Peoples is involved in inquiries and reviews by tax
authorities that normally require management to provide supplemental information to support certain tax positions
taken by Peoples in its tax returns. Uncertain tax positions are initially recognized in the consolidated financial
statements when it is more likely than not the position will be sustained upon examination by the tax authorities. Such
tax positions are initially and subsequently measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely
of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the tax authority assuming full knowledge of the position and all
relevant facts. Management believes it has taken appropriate positions on its tax returns, although the ultimate
outcome of any tax review cannot be predicted with certainty. Consequently, no assurance can be given that the final
outcome of these matters will not be different than what is reflected in the current and historical financial statements.
Fair Value Measurements
As a financial services company, the carrying value of certain financial assets and liabilities is impacted by the
application of fair value measurements, either directly or indirectly. In certain cases, an asset or liability is measured and
reported at fair value on a recurring basis, such as available-for-sale investment securities. In other cases, management
must rely on estimates or judgments to determine if an asset or liability not measured at fair value warrants an impairment
write-down or whether a valuation reserve should be established. Given the inherent volatility, the use of fair value
measurements may have a significant impact on the carrying value of assets or liabilities, or result in material changes to
the consolidated financial statements, from period to period.
Detailed information regarding fair value measurements can be found in Note 2 of the Notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements. The following is a summary of those assets and liabilities that may be affected by fair value
measurements, as well as a brief description of the current accounting practices and valuation methodologies employed by
Peoples:
Available-for-SaleInvestmentSecurities
Investment securities classified as available-for-sale are measured and reported at fair value on a recurring basis.
For most securities, the fair value is based upon quoted market prices or determined by pricing models that consider
observable market data. However, the fair value of certain investment securities, such as CDO securities and similar
structured investments, must be based upon unobservable market data, such as non-binding broker quotes and
discounted cash flow analysis or similar models, due to the absence of an active market for these securities. As a
result, management’s determination of fair value for these securities is highly dependent on subjective or complex
judgments, estimates and assumptions, which could change materially between periods. Management occasionally
uses information from independent third-party consultants in its determination of the fair value of more complex
investment securities, such as the CDO securities. At December 31, 2010, all of Peoples’ available-for-sale investment
securities were measured using observable market data.
Impairedloans
For loans considered impaired, the amount of impairment loss recognized is determined based on a discounted
cash flow analysis or the fair value of the underlying collateral if repayment is expected solely from the sale of the
collateral. Management typically relies on the fair value of the underlying collateral due to the significant uncertainty
surrounding the borrower’s ability to make future payments. The vast majority of the collateral securing impaired
loans is real estate, although it may also include accounts receivable and equipment, inventory or similar personal
property. The fair value of the collateral used by management represents the estimated proceeds to be received from
the sale of the collateral, less costs incurred during the sale, based upon observable market data and market value data
provided by independent, licensed or certified appraisers.
Goodwill
The process of evaluating goodwill for impairment involves highly subjective or complex judgments, estimates
and assumptions regarding the fair value of Peoples’ reporting unit and, in some cases, goodwill itself. As a result,
changes to these judgments, estimates and assumptions in future periods could result in materially different results.
31
Peoples currently possesses a single reporting unit for goodwill impairment testing. While quoted market prices
exist for Peoples’ common shares since they are publicly traded, these market prices do not necessarily reflect the
value associated with gaining control of an entity. Thus, management takes into account all appropriate fair value
measurements in determining the estimated fair value of the reporting unit. These measurements include transaction
prices of recently acquired institutions based upon multiples of book value or earnings and discounted cash flow
analysis.
For Peoples’ December 31, 2010 goodwill impairment test, management estimated the fair value of Peoples’
reporting unit using both an income approach and a market approach. The income approach consisted of a discounted
cash flow analysis of projected future earnings. The market approach was based upon multiples of book value of
recently acquired financial institutions, including distressed institutions. The discount rate used represented the
estimated cost of Peoples’ common equity based upon observable market data. The fair values derived under both
approaches were weighted to arrive at an overall estimated fair value. Management placed greater weight on the
income approach due to the limited number of acquisitions occurring in 2010 involving healthy or non-distress entities
compared to prior years. Consequently, the estimated fair value of Peoples’ reporting unit could be materially different
in future periods due to changes in either projected future earnings or the cost of common equity.
The measurement of any actual impairment loss requires management to calculate the implied fair value of
goodwill by deducting the fair value of all tangible and separately identifiable intangible net assets (including
unrecognized intangible assets) from the fair value of the reporting unit. The fair value of net tangible assets is
calculated using the methodologies described in Note 2 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Customer relationship intangibles are the only separately identifiable intangible assets included in the calculation of the
implied fair value of goodwill. The amount of these intangibles represents the present value of the future earnings
stream attributable to the deposit relationships.
MortgageServicingRights
MSRs are carried at the lower of cost or market value, and, therefore, can be subject to fair value measurements on
a nonrecurring basis. MSRs do not trade in an active market with readily observable prices. Thus, management
determines fair value based upon a valuation model that calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing
income provided by an independent third party consultant. This valuation model is affected by various input factors,
such as servicing costs, expected prepayment speeds and discount rates, which are subject to change between reporting
periods. As a result, significant changes to these factors could result in a material change to the calculated fair value of
MSRs.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In 2010, net income available to common shareholders totaled $3.5 million, versus $2.3 million in 2009 and $7.5
million in 2008, representing diluted earnings per common share of $0.34, $0.22 and $0.72, respectively. Key factors for
the lower earnings over the last three years were higher than historical levels of provision for loan losses and other loan-
related credit losses, plus OTTI losses related to investment securities. Earnings available to common shareholders for
2009 and 2010 also were reduced by preferred dividends of $1.9 million and $2.1 million, respectively, related to the TARP
Capital Investment. Despite these challenges, Peoples generated positive results in several key areas, including expansion
of retail deposits, expense control and continued diversification of revenues.
Provision for loan losses totaled $26.9 million in 2010, compared to $25.7 million in 2009 and $27.6 million in
2008. These provisions reflect the amounts needed to maintain the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses based on
management’s formal quarterly analysis. The combination of steady declines in commercial real estate values and the
deteriorating financial condition of borrowers commensurate with recessionary economic conditions resulted in higher
provisions for loan losses than historical amounts.
Net interest income decreased 3% in 2010 compared to the prior year, due primarily to decreased earning assets as a
result of commercial loan payoffs and charge-offs, coupled with lower reinvestment rates corresponding with market
interest rates. In comparison, net interest income grew 6% in 2009, due to a greater decrease in Peoples' funding costs in
comparison to asset yields in response to lower short-term market rates. Net interest margin has been relatively stable over
the last three years, as management took steps to adjust the balance sheet size and mix to lessen the impact of historically
low market interest rates.
Non-interest income, which excludes the impact of gains and losses, was down slightly in 2010 compared to the prior
year. Electronic banking income increased 19% in 2010, while trust and investment income grew 13%. Both of these
32
increases were more than offset by lower deposit account service charges and insurance income. In 2009, total non-interest
income was consistent with the prior year. Peoples experienced significant growth in mortgage banking income due to
strong refinancing activity, which was offset by declines in other non-interest income categories.
Total non-interest expense decreased 3% in 2010, to $57.0 million, largely attributable to cost saving initiatives
implemented during 2010. The impact of these initiatives was tempered by costs associated with an elevated level of
foreclosed real estate and problems loans. In 2009, total non-interest expense was up $5.2 million over the prior year, with
most of this increase due to $3.1 million in additional FDIC insurance expense. Other significant factors impacting the
increase in 2009 included higher employee medical benefit costs and workout costs for problem loans.
Total assets decreased $163.8 million in 2010, to $1.84 billion at December 31, 2010, due primarily to a planned
reduction in the size of the investment portfolio. As a result, total investment securities decreased $110.6 million, to $641.3
million at December 31, 2010. Cash and cash equivalents were $74.6 million at year-end 2010, versus $41.8 million at
December 31, 2009. This increase was the result of Peoples maintaining a higher level of excess cash reserves at the
Federal Reserve Bank. Gross portfolio loan balances decreased $91.3 million in 2010, due primarily to commercial loan
payoffs and charge-offs exceeding new production. At December 31, 2010, the allowance for loan losses was $26.8
million, or 2.79% of gross loans, versus $27.3 million, or 2.59%, at year-end 2009. The increase in allowance percentage
was primarily attributable to elevated charge-offs in recent quarters, and was partially offset by the lower level of watch-
rated credits, which are loans possessing some credit deficiency or potential weakness.
At December 31, 2010, total liabilities were $1.61 billion, down $150.6 million or 9% compared to year-end
2009. Much of this decrease was attributable to balance sheet deleveraging in 2010, which included reductions in high-
cost, non-core deposits and wholesale borrowings. Total deposit balances decreased $34.3 million in 2010, as a $51.4
million decline in interest-bearing deposits, primarily certificates of deposit and governmental public funds, was partially
offset by growth in non-interest-bearing deposits of $17.1 million. At December 31, 2010, total borrowed funds were down
$113.8 million, or 33%, to $231.8 million, compared to year-end 2009.
Total stockholders’ equity was 5% lower at year-end 2010 than at December 31, 2009. This decrease was due entirely
to a decline in fair value of Peoples’ available-for-sale investment portfolio, which resulted in a $15.1 million decrease in
stockholders' equity. As a result, tangible common equity was 7.17% of tangible assets at year-end 2010, versus 7.22% at
December 31, 2009. Peoples' Total Risk-Based capital ratio remained strong at 18.24% at year-end 2010, compared to
16.80% at December 31, 2009.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Interest Income and Expense
Peoples earns interest income on loans and investments and incurs interest expense on interest-bearing deposits and
borrowed funds. Net interest income, the amount by which interest income exceeds interest expense, remains Peoples’
largest source of revenue. The amount of net interest income earned by Peoples is affected by various factors, including
changes in market interest rates due to the Federal Reserve Board’s monetary policy, the level and degree of pricing
competition for both loans and deposits in Peoples’ markets and the amount and composition of Peoples’ earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities.
Peoples monitors net interest income performance and manages its balance sheet composition through regular Asset-
Liability Management Committee (“ALCO”) meetings. The asset/liability management process employed by the ALCO is
intended to mitigate the impact of future interest rate changes on Peoples’ net interest income and earnings. However, the
frequency and/or magnitude of changes in market interest rates are difficult to predict, and may have a greater impact on net
interest income than adjustments management is able to make.
As part of the analysis of net interest income, management converts tax-exempt income to the pre-tax equivalent of
taxable income using an effective tax rate of 35%. Management believes the resulting fully tax-equivalent (“FTE”) net
interest income allows for a more meaningful comparison of tax-exempt income and yields to their taxable equivalents.
Net interest margin, calculated by dividing FTE net interest income by average interest-earning assets, serves as the primary
measure used in evaluating the net revenue stream generated by the mix and pricing of Peoples’ earning assets and interest-
bearing liabilities.
33
The following table details Peoples’ average balance sheets for the years ended December 31:
(Dollars in thousands)
Short-Term Investments:
Total short-term investments
Investment Securities (1):
Taxable
Nontaxable (2)
Total investment securities
Loans (3):
Commercial
Real estate (4)
Consumer
Total loans
Less: Allowance for loan losses
Net loans
Total earning assets
Intangible assets
Other assets
Total assets
Deposits:
Savings accounts
Interest-bearing demand accounts
Money market accounts
Brokered certificates of deposit
Retail certificates of deposit
Total interest-bearing deposits
Borrowed Funds:
Short-term FHLB advances
Retail repurchase agreements
Total short-term borrowings
Long-term FHLB advances
Wholesale repurchase agreements
Other borrowings
Total long-term borrowings
Total borrowed funds
Total interest-bearing liabilities
Non-interest-bearing deposits
Other liabilities
Total liabilities
Preferred equity
Common equity
Total stockholders’ equity
Total liabilities and
stockholders’ equity
Interest rate spread
Net interest margin
2010
2009
2008
Average
Balance
Income/ Yield/
Expense Rate
Average
Balance
Income/ Yield/
Expense Rate
Average
Balance
Income/ Yield/
Expense Rate
$
36,508
$
91
0.25%
$
28,496
$
70
0.25%
$
2,871
$
65
2.28%
656,719
57,781
714,500
4.53%
29,728
3,621 6.27%
4.67%
33,349
660,828
67,471
728,299
34,522 5.22%
4,325 6.41%
38,847 5.33%
549,687
65,624
615,311
29,106
4,289
33,395
5.30%
6.54%
5.43%
5.30%
36,169
14,650
5.61%
6,618 7.68%
5.58%
57,437
57,437
90,877
5.74%
5.19%
$
193
0.16%
2,614 1.11%
2,171 0.74%
2,994 2.93%
2.47%
11,150
1.59%
19,122
10 0.11%
252 0.49%
262 0.44%
3,624 3.53%
4,440 3.87%
1,985 8.69%
4.18%
10,049
3.44%
10,311
1.96%
29,433
$
$
682,736
260,964
86,203
1,029,903
(29,597)
1,000,306
1,751,314
65,153
145,260
1,961,727
120,301
234,503
291,632
102,153
451,746
1,200,335
8,712
50,185
58,897
102,685
113,219
22,548
238,452
297,349
1,497,684
210,310
14,336
1,722,330
38,594
200,803
239,397
40,299 5.56%
17,163 6.27%
7,331 7.76%
64,793 5.93%
64,793 6.07%
5.68%
103,710
$
645
0.51%
3,127 1.51%
2,735 1.16%
4,500 3.43%
15,116 2.99%
26,123 2.17%
15 0.19%
468 0.87%
483 0.81%
5,354 3.93%
6,323 4.05%
1,979 8.67%
13,656 4.37%
14,139 3.76%
40,262 2.55%
$
$
725,021
273,625
94,411
1,093,057
(25,081)
1,067,976
1,824,771
66,010
133,530
2,024,311
126,226
207,117
235,690
131,071
506,132
1,206,236
6,867
53,056
59,923
136,272
153,795
22,513
312,580
372,503
1,578,739
195,688
17,036
1,791,463
35,438
197,410
232,848
48,291
19,221
6,861
74,373
6.49%
6.79%
8.04%
6.69%
74,373
107,833
6.79%
6.29%
$
583
3,578
3,482
3,767
19,900
31,310
2,557
826
3,383
4,856
6,223
1,976
13,055
16,438
47,748
0.51%
1.79%
2.07%
4.10%
3.91%
2.89%
2.46%
2.00%
2.37%
4.18%
4.13%
8.65%
4.55%
3.78%
3.15%
$
$
744,584
283,285
85,378
1,113,247
(17,428)
1,095,819
1,714,001
67,203
128,798
1,910,002
114,651
199,639
168,075
91,797
508,497
1,082,659
102,146
40,524
142,670
116,176
148,251
22,478
286,905
429,575
1,512,234
180,973
13,892
1,707,099
–
202,903
202,903
$
1,961,727
$
2,024,311
$
1,910,002
$
61,444
3.23%
3.51%
$
63,448
3.13%
3.48%
$
60,085
3.14%
3.51%
Interest income and yields are presented on a fully tax-equivalent basis using a 35% federal tax rate.
(1) Average balances are based on carrying value.
(2)
(3) Nonaccrual and impaired loans are included in the average loan balances. Related interest income earned on nonaccrual loans prior to
the loan being placed on nonaccrual status is included in loan interest income. Loan fees included in interest income were immaterial
for all periods presented.
(4) Loans held for sale are included in the average loan balance listed. Related interest income on loans originated for sale prior to the
loan being sold is included in loan interest income.
34
The following table details the calculation of FTE net interest income for the years ended December 31:
(Dollars in thousands)
Net interest income, as reported
Taxable equivalent adjustments
Fully tax-equivalent net interest income
2010
$ 59,902
1,542
$ 61,444
2009
$ 61,843
1,605
$ 63,448
2008
$ 58,479
1,606
$ 60,085
The following table provides an analysis of the changes in net interest income:
(Dollars in thousands)
Increase (decrease) in:
INTEREST INCOME:
Short-term investments
Investment Securities: (2)
Taxable
Nontaxable
Total investment income
Loans:
Commercial
Real estate
Consumer
Total loan income
Total interest income
INTEREST EXPENSE:
Deposits:
Savings deposits
Interest-bearing transaction
Money market
Brokered time
Retail time
Total deposit cost
Borrowed funds:
Short-term borrowings
Long-term borrowings
Total borrowed funds cost
Total interest expense
Net interest income
Change from 2009 to 2010 (1)
Volume
Rate
Total
Change from 2008 to 2009 (1)
Volume
Rate
Total
$
– $
21 $
21
$
(93) $
98 $
5
(4,581)
(93)
(4,674)
(1,831)
(1,747)
(80)
(3,658)
(8,332)
(423)
(894)
(1,125)
(601)
(2,450)
(5,493)
(199)
(779)
(978)
(6,471)
(1,861) $
$
(214)
(611)
(825)
(2,298)
(766)
(633)
(3,697)
(4,501)
(29)
381
561
(905)
(1,516)
(1,508)
(22)
(2,828)
(2,850)
(4,358)
(143) $
(4,795)
(704)
(5,499)
(4,129)
(2,513)
(713)
(7,355)
(12,833)
(452)
(513)
(564)
(1,506)
(3,966)
(7,001)
(221)
(3,607)
(3,828)
(10,829)
(2,004)
(421)
(86)
(507)
(6,756)
(1,422)
(240)
(8,418)
(9,018)
1
(580)
(1,851)
(688)
(4,692)
(7,810)
(1,818)
(420)
(2,238)
(10,048)
$
1,030 $
5,837
122
5,959
(1,236)
(636)
710
(1,162)
4,895
61
129
1,104
1,421
(92)
2,623
(1,082)
1,021
(61)
2,562
2,333 $
5,416
36
5,452
(7,992)
(2,058)
470
(9,580)
(4,123)
62
(451)
(747)
733
(4,784)
(5,187)
(2,900)
601
(2,299)
(7,486)
3,363
(1) The change in interest due to both rate and volume has been allocated to volume and rate changes in proportion to the
relationship of the dollar amounts of the change in each.
(2) Presented on a fully tax-equivalent basis.
In 2010, net interest income was adversely affected by declining asset yields as excess funds were reinvested at lower
market interest rates, especially during the second half of the year when the yield curve flattened. A contributing factor for
the lower net interest income in 2010 was the decrease in loan balances experienced during the year. Given these
conditions, management took steps throughout 2010 to reduce funding costs, where possible, as a means of offsetting the
lower asset yields. These efforts included adjusting Peoples' funding mix away from high-cost deposits and wholesale
borrowings and into lower-cost, core deposits. However, the ability to reduce funding costs was limited by the lack of
significant high-cost liabilities maturing in 2010.
In comparison, net interest income in 2009 benefited from the lower short-term market interest rates that existed
because of the Federal Reserve's actions, as Peoples was able to reduce its funding costs to a greater extent than the decline
experienced in its asset yields. Additionally, growth in low-cost retail deposits allowed Peoples to repay maturing higher-
cost wholesale funding, further contributing to the decline in funding costs.
Peoples' net interest margin, although pressured by the changes in interest rates and corresponding slope of the yield
curve, remained relatively consistent in both 2010 and 2009, due to Peoples' active management of its balance sheet and
interest rate risk profile. Net interest margin also was negatively impacted by Peoples maintaining excess cash reserves at
35
the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland. These cash balances were maintained due to a lack of investment opportunities
that satisfied management's risk-reward criteria, coupled with Peoples’ desire to repay maturing high-cost wholesale
funding.
Average loan balances decreased in both 2009 and 2010, reflecting significant commercial loan payoffs and elevated
charge-off levels over the last three years. Average loan balances also were impacted by residential real estate loans being
refinanced and sold to the secondary market due to customer demand for long-term, fixed-rate loans. While these
reductions in average loan balances negatively impacted interest income, Peoples took advantage of attractive investment
opportunities that were available during most of 2008 and early 2009, which accounted for the increase in average
investment securities since 2008.
Detailed information regarding changes in Peoples’ Consolidated Balance Sheets can be found under appropriate
captions of the “FINANCIAL CONDITION” section of this discussion. Additional information regarding Peoples’ interest
rate risk and the potential impact of interest rate changes on Peoples’ results of operations and financial condition can be
found later in this discussion under the caption “Interest Rate Sensitivity and Liquidity”.
Provision for Loan Losses
The following table details Peoples’ provision for loan losses:
(Dollars in thousands)
Provision for checking account overdrafts
Provision for other loan losses
Total provision for loan losses
2010
551
26,365
26,916
$
$
2009
799
24,922
25,721
$
$
2008
1,125
26,515
27,640
$
$
As a percentage of average gross loans
2.61%
2.35%
2.48%
The provision for loan losses is based on management’s formal quarterly evaluation of the loan portfolio and analysis
of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses described in the “Critical Accounting Policies” section of this discussion.
This analysis considers various factors that affect losses, such as changes in Peoples’ loan quality, historical loss experience
and current economic conditions.
Additional information regarding changes in the allowance for loan losses and loan credit quality can be found later in
this discussion under the caption “Allowance for Loan Losses”.
Net Impairment Losses
The following table details the net impairment losses recognized on available-for-sale securities:
(Dollars in thousands)
Collateralized debt obligations
Mortgage-backed securities
Individual bank-issued trust preferred securities
Preferred stocks
Total net impairment losses
2010
2009
2008
$
$
986
800
–
–
1,786
$
$
3,707
–
4,000
–
7,707
$
$
1,920
–
2,080
260
4,260
These impairment losses were the result of management determining certain securities were other-than-temporarily
impaired. These determinations were made in connection with management’s quarterly analysis of the investment portfolio
described in the “Critical Accounting Policies” section of this discussion, which included evaluating the credit quality of
underlying issuers and estimating cash flows to be received from the securities.
Since 2007, the fair value of CDO securities, including those held in Peoples’ investment portfolio, has been affected
by the continued liquidity and credit concerns within the financial markets, as well as the downgrading of these securities
by rating agencies. Additionally, several underlying issuers have either deferred or defaulted on the payment obligations,
which reduced the overall cash flow stream in these structured investments. In 2009, management’s analysis concluded
Peoples’ two mezzanine tranche CDO securities were total losses since it was probable Peoples would not recover the
amortized cost of the securities. Similarly, Peoples' two equity tranche CDO securities were deemed total losses in the first
quarter of 2010 based on management's analysis of estimated cash flows to be received. Additional information regarding
Peoples’ investments in CDO securities can be found later in this discussion under the caption “Investment Securities”.
The losses attributable to individual bank-issued trust preferred securities involved two unrelated issuers who had
deferred interest payments. Management deemed the securities a total loss since its analysis indicated it was probable
Peoples would not recover the entire principal amounts. Subsequent to management’s determinations, federal banking
36
regulators closed the banking subsidiaries of both issuers, with the FDIC being appointed as receiver of the failed
institutions.
The preferred stock losses related to preferred stocks issued by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Management performed its quarterly analysis of the remaining investment securities with an unrealized loss at
December 31, 2010, and concluded no other individual securities were other-than-temporarily impaired.
Other Gains and Losses
The following table details the other gains and losses recognized in each of the last three years:
(Dollars in thousands)
Net (loss) gain attributable to:
Early debt extinguishment
OREO
Loans held-for-sale
Disposals of bank premises and equipment
Sale of merchant services
Sale of banking office
Total other (losses) gains
2010
2009
2008
$
$
(3,630)
(1,854)
(1,319)
(88)
–
–
(6,891)
$
$
–
(118)
–
15
–
–
(103)
$
$
–
(9)
–
(10)
500
275
756
The loss recognized on early debt extinguishment in 2010 was the result of the prepayments completed in the third
quarter. Almost all of the net loss on OREO recognized in 2010 was the result of write-downs on two unrelated
commercial properties held as OREO throughout 2010, while the losses in prior years were attributable to sales of OREO.
Non-Interest Income
Peoples generates non-interest income, which excludes gains and losses on investments and other assets, from six
primary sources: deposit account service charges, trust and investment activities, insurance sales revenues, electronic
banking (“e-banking”), mortgage banking and bank owned life insurance (“BOLI”).
In recent years, Peoples has placed increased emphasis on reducing its reliance on net interest income by growing non-
interest income, especially fee-based revenues not affected by interest rate changes, and, thus, diversifying its revenue
stream. In 2010, non-interest income was driven primarily by stronger e-banking revenue and trust and investment income,
as recessionary economic conditions negatively impacted other non-interest revenues. Total non-interest income accounted
for 34.6% of Peoples’ total revenues in 2010, compared to 34.1% in 2009 and 35.4% in 2008.
Service charges and other fees on deposit accounts, which are based on the recovery of costs associated with services
provided, comprised the largest portion of Peoples’ non-interest income. Management periodically evaluates its cost
recovery fees to ensure they are reasonable based on operational costs and similar to fees charged in Peoples’ markets by
competitors. The following table details Peoples’ deposit account service charges:
(Dollars in thousands)
Overdraft fees
Non-sufficient funds fees
Other fees and charges
Total deposit account service charges
2010
7,012
1,345
1,224
9,581
$
$
2009
7,869
1,467
1,054
10,390
$
$
2008
7,356
1,682
1,099
10,137
$
$
The amount of deposit account service charges, particularly overdraft and non-sufficient funds fees, is largely
dependent on the timing and volume of customer activity. As a result, the amount ultimately recognized by Peoples can
fluctuate from period to period. Peoples experiences seasonal changes in overdraft and non-sufficient funds fees, primarily
in the first and fourth quarters. Typically, the volume of overdraft and non-sufficient funds fees are lower in the first quarter
attributable to customers receiving income tax refunds, while volumes generally increase in the fourth quarter in connection
with the holiday shopping season.
New regulations governing overdraft fees became effective during the third quarter of 2010, which limit the ability of
banks to impose overdraft fees on certain transactions. Management has taken steps to mitigate the adverse impact of the
regulatory changes. As a result, the lower overdraft fees in 2010 largely reflect reduced volumes driven by changes in
customer behavior. Therefore, it remains difficult to predict whether or not the overdraft fee regulations will have a
material adverse affect on Peoples’ deposit account service charges.
37
Insurance income also comprises a significant portion of Peoples’ total non-interest income. The following table
details Peoples’ insurance income:
(Dollars in thousands)
Property and casualty insurance commissions
Life and health insurance commissions
Credit life and A&H insurance commissions
Performance based commissions
Other fees and charges
Total insurance income
2010
2009
2008
$
$
7,385
580
123
585
173
8,846
$
$
7,633
661
119
828
149
9,390
$
$
7,982
645
175
864
236
9,902
Peoples’ insurance income consists predominantly of commission revenue from the sale of property and casualty
insurance to commercial customers. While Peoples continues to be successful at retaining existing insurance customers,
property and casualty insurance commission levels in 2009 and 2010 were lower, reflecting the effects of a contracting
economy on commercial insurance needs, plus lower pricing margins due to competition within the insurance industry. The
bulk of the performance based commission income is received annually by Peoples during the first quarter and is based on a
combination of factors, including loss experience of insurance policies sold, production volumes and overall financial
performance of the insurance industry during the preceding year. As a result, the amount of performance based
commission income recognized by Peoples is difficult to predict and could fluctuate from year to year.
Peoples’ trust and investment income is comprised of revenue generated from its fiduciary activities and the sale of
investment services. The following table details Peoples’ trust and investment income for the years ended December 31
and market value of managed assets at year-end:
(Dollars in thousands)
Fiduciary
Brokerage
Total trust and investment income
Trust assets under management
Brokerage assets under management
Total managed assets
Average during the year
2010
2009
2008
4,396
952
5,348
836,587
256,579
1,093,166
$
$
$
$
3,760
962
4,722
750,993
216,479
967,472
$
$
$
$
4,113
1,026
5,139
685,705
184,301
870,006
977,577
$
873,930
$
942,965
$
$
$
$
$
Both fiduciary and brokerage revenues are based primarily on the value of assets under management. The market
value of Peoples’ managed assets was impacted by the downturn in the financial markets that occurred in the second half of
2008 and continued through most of 2009. Since late 2009, the value of managed assets has increased due in large part to
the general recovery experienced in the financial markets. During 2008, Peoples attracted over $50 million in new assets,
which generated additional revenue and offset the impact of lower market values in the second half of 2008. In
comparison, Peoples added nearly $31 million in managed assets during 2010, which contributed to the increase in trust and
investment income.
Peoples’ e-banking services include ATM and debit cards, direct deposit services and internet banking, and serve as
alternative delivery channels to traditional sales offices for providing services to clients. In 2010, Peoples’ customers used
their debit cards to complete $338 million of transactions, versus $290 million in 2009 and $272 million in 2008,
representing increases of 17% and 7%, respectively. At December 31, 2010, Peoples had 44,609 deposit relationships with
debit cards, or 59% of all eligible deposit accounts, compared to 40,663 relationships, or 57% of eligible accounts, at year-
end 2009 and 39,279 relationships, or 57% of eligible accounts, at December 31, 2008.
Peoples’ mortgage banking income is comprised mostly of net gains from the origination and sale of long-term, fixed-
rate real estate loans to the secondary market. As a result, the amount of income recognized by Peoples is largely
dependent on customer demand and long-term interest rates for residential real estate loans offered by the secondary
market. For most of 2009 and the second half of 2010, Peoples’ secondary market loan production was stronger than in
recent years, due mostly to significant refinancing activity. Long-term mortgage rates rose modestly during the second half
of 2009, which persisted in the first half of 2010, resulting in decreased refinancing activity during that period. During
2010, Peoples sold $64 million of residential real estate loans to the secondary market, versus $95 million in 2009 and $32
million in 2008.
Income generated by Peoples’ BOLI investment serves to enhance operating efficiency by partially offsetting rising
employee benefit costs. Changes in the interest rate environment can have an impact on the associated investment funds
38
and thus the amount of BOLI income recognized by Peoples. Management monitors the performance of Peoples’ BOLI
and may make adjustments to improve the income streams and overall performance. While the current low interest rate
environment has resulted in decreased BOLI income over the last two years, management believes BOLI continues to
possess greater long-term potential to fund future employee benefit costs, and offset the related expense, than alternative
investment opportunities with similar risk characteristics.
Non-Interest Expense
In 2010, Peoples' operating expenses were generally controlled due in part to various cost saving initiatives
implemented during the year. These initiatives included freezing virtually all base salaries, curtailing certain employee
benefits and reducing or limiting other operating costs. However, the overall impact on total non-interest expense was
limited by higher costs associated with problem loan workouts.
Salaries and employee benefit costs represent Peoples’ largest non-interest expense, accounting for over 50% of total
non-interest expense, which is inherent in a service-based industry such as financial services.
The following table details Peoples’ salaries and employee benefit costs:
(Dollars in thousands)
Base salaries and wages
Employee benefits
Sales-based and incentive compensation
Stock-based compensation
Deferred personnel costs
Payroll taxes and other employment-related costs
Total salaries and employee benefit costs
2010
$ 20,269
4,802
3,365
92
(1,260)
1,954
$ 29,222
2009
$ 20,455
5,037
3,130
149
(1,477)
2,100
$ 29,394
2008
$ 20,370
3,983
3,672
498
(1,984)
1,982
$ 28,521
Full-time equivalent employees:
Actual at December 31
Average during the year
534
531
537
543
546
552
Peoples limited salary increases for all employees in both 2009 and 2010, which has caused base salaries and wages to
be relatively flat when compared with the previous year. Peoples’ employee benefit costs have been impacted by a steady
increase in employee medical benefit costs in recent years. For 2010, Peoples reduced its matching contribution to its
401(k) plan, which more than offset the slight increase in employee medical benefit costs. The majority of the sales-based
and incentive compensation is attributable to Peoples’ insurance and investment sales activities.
Stock-based compensation is generally recognized over the vesting period, typically ranging from 6 months to 3 years,
although Peoples must immediately recognize the entire expense for awards to employees who are eligible for retirement at
the grant date. The majority of Peoples’ stock-based compensation expense is attributable to annual equity-based incentive
awards to employees, which are awarded in the first quarter and based upon Peoples achieving certain performance goals
during the prior year. Peoples did not grant any equity-based incentive awards to employees or non-employee directors in
either 2009 or 2010, due to lower corporate performance results, resulting in decreased stock-based compensation expense
being recognized for both years compared to prior years. Additional information regarding Peoples’ stock-based
compensation plans and awards can be found in Note 18 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Deferred personnel costs represent the portion of current period salaries and employee benefit costs considered to be
direct loan origination costs. These costs are capitalized and recognized over the life of the loan through interest income as
a yield adjustment. As a result, the amount of deferred personal costs for each year corresponds directly with the level of
new loan originations. Additional information regarding Peoples' loan activity can be found later in this discussion under
the caption “Loans”.
Peoples’ net occupancy and equipment expense was comprised of the following:
(Dollars in thousands)
Depreciation
Repairs and maintenance costs
Net rent expense
Property taxes, utilities and other costs
Total net occupancy and equipment expense
2010
2009
2008
$
$
1,943
1,596
894
1,348
5,781
$
$
1,998
1,549
837
1,372
5,756
$
$
2,066
1,452
671
1,351
5,540
39
Depreciation expense has decreased in each of the past two years due to existing assets becoming fully depreciated,
coupled with fewer shorter-lived assets, such as computers and other office equipment, being placed in service.
Management continues to monitor capital expenditures and explore opportunities to enhance Peoples’ operating efficiency.
Professional fees expense represents the cost of accounting, legal and other third-party professional services utilized by
Peoples. During 2009 and 2010, professional fees were impacted by an increased utilization of external legal services
corresponding with the elevated levels of under performing loans and associated workout efforts. Another significant
driver of the higher professional fees in 2010 was increased consulting services related to various management projects
during the fourth quarter. Professional fees for 2009 included legal and consulting fees incurred during the first quarter
associated with the TARP Capital Investment and preparation of proxy materials for the Special Meeting of Shareholders.
While actions taken by the FDIC resulted in higher FDIC insurance costs for 2009 and 2010, Peoples' FDIC insurance
expense in 2008 benefited from the utilization of a $1.0 million one-time credit received in 2007. This credit was received
in connection with changes to the deposit insurance system for use to offset future insurance premiums, subject to certain
limitations. Peoples utilized $0.5 million of this credit during 2007 and the remainder during the first nine months of
2008. Additional information regarding Peoples' FDIC insurance assessments may be found in Item 1 of this 10-K in the
section captioned "Supervision and Regulations".
Peoples’ e-banking expense, which is comprised of bankcard and internet-based banking costs, increased in both 2009
and 2010 as a result of customers completing a larger percentage of their transactions using their debit cards and Peoples’
internet banking service. These factors have also produced a greater increase in the corresponding e-banking revenues over
the same periods. Overall, management believes e-banking expense levels are reasonable considering Peoples’ e-banking
services have generated higher net revenues and have helped to improve overall relationship profitability, due to the lower
transaction costs incurred by Peoples.
Peoples is subject to state franchise taxes, which are based largely on Peoples Bank’s equity at year-end, in the states
where it has a physical presence. Overall, state franchise taxes have remained consistent over the last three years, due to
relatively stable equity levels at Peoples Bank. Peoples regularly evaluates the capital position of its direct and indirect
subsidiaries from both a cost and leverage perspective. Ultimately, management seeks to optimize Peoples’ consolidated
capital position through allocation of capital, which is intended to enhance profitability and shareholder value.
Foreclosed real estate and other loan expenses represent costs associated with maintaining foreclosed assets, including
real estate taxes and utilities, as well as various administrative costs incurred in connection with servicing and collecting
outstanding loans. In both 2009 and 2010, Peoples incurred additional expense due to the higher level of impaired and
nonperforming assets. Further contributing to the increase in 2010 were costs associated with two unrelated commercial
properties acquired through foreclosure in the fourth quarter of 2009.
Peoples’ intangible asset amortization expense decreased in both 2009 and 2010 from the use of an accelerated method
of amortization for its customer-related intangibles. As a result, amortization expense will continue to be lower in
subsequent years based on the intangible assets included on Peoples’ Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2010.
Income Tax Expense/Benefit
A key driver of the amount of income tax expense or benefit recognized by Peoples each year is the amount of pre-tax
income derived from tax-exempt sources. Additionally, Peoples receives tax benefits from its investments in tax credit
funds, which reduce Peoples' effective tax rate. A reconciliation of Peoples' recorded income tax expense/benefit and
effective tax rate to the statutory tax rate can be found in Note 14 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Peoples considers cash and cash equivalents to consist of Federal Funds sold, cash and balances due from banks,
interest-bearing balances in other institutions and other short-term investments that are readily liquid. The amount of cash
and cash equivalents fluctuates on a daily basis due to customer activity and Peoples’ liquidity needs. During 2009 and
2010, Peoples maintained excess cash reserves at the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland rather than in Federal Funds sold
due to more favorable interest rates. These excess reserves are included in interest-bearing deposits in other banks on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets and totaled $44.6 million and $11.4 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. No
such excess reserves were maintained prior to 2009.
40
In 2010, total cash and cash equivalents increased $32.9 million, driven by net cash provided by Peoples' investing and
operating activities of $141.5 million and $45.1 million, respectively, of which $153.7 million was used in financing
activities. The net cash provided by investing activities was primarily the result of management not reinvesting $84.1
million of the cash flow generated from the investment portfolio, coupled with loan payments and payoffs exceeding new
originations by $61.1 million. The net cash used in Peoples' financing activities was attributed to intentional reductions in
borrowed funds and interest-bearing deposit balances.
In comparison, total cash and cash equivalents decreased $6.2 million in 2009, as the net cash provided by Peoples’
operating and investing activities of $23.3 million and $7.8 million, respectively, was used in financing activities. Net cash
provided by investing activities was the result of loan payments and payoffs exceeding new originations by $24.7 million,
of which a portion was used for purchases of new investment securities. Financing activities consumed $24.9 million of net
cash, as Peoples reduced borrowed funds by $84.1 million, which was partially offset by $68.4 million of funds from net
deposit growth and the TARP Capital Investment.
Further information regarding the management of Peoples’ liquidity position can be found later in this discussion under
“Interest Rate Sensitivity and Liquidity.”
Investment Securities
The following table details Peoples’ available-for-sale investment portfolio at December 31:
(Dollars in thousands)
Obligations of:
U.S. Treasury and government agencies
U.S. government sponsored agencies
States and political subdivisions
Residential mortgage-backed securities
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
Bank-issued trust preferred securities
Equity securities
U.S. government-backed student loan pools
Collateralized debt obligations
Preferred stocks
Total fair value
Total amortized cost
Net unrealized (loss) gain
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
$
39
12,262
47,379
507,534
30,700
12,984
3,088
–
–
–
$ 613,986
$ 617,121
(3,135)
$
$
82
4,473
62,953
558,825
24,188
13,826
2,593
59,442
165
–
$ 726,547
$ 706,444
20,103
$
$
176
8,442
68,930
511,201
25,951
17,888
2,761
44,985
4,423
–
$ 684,757
$ 696,855
$ (12,098)
$
197
74,470
69,247
356,605
–
19,185
4,566
–
5,896
12,065
$ 542,231
$ 535,979
6,252
$
$
282
105,858
53,938
304,413
–
29,594
4,588
–
2,120
24,742
$ 525,535
$ 527,041
(1,506)
$
The size and composition of Peoples’ investment portfolio changed significantly since year-end 2009, primarily
reflecting the deleveraging undertaken in the third quarter. While the majority of the proceeds from the third quarter 2010
investment sales were used to prepay long-term borrowings, a portion was reinvested into bonds issued by U.S. government
sponsored agencies, which accounted for the increase in this segment at December 31, 2010.
In late 2008 and early 2009, Peoples purchased seven different floating-rate U.S. government-backed student loan
pools, with an aggregate par amount of $58 million, at moderate discounts due to the market conditions that existed at that
time. These securities were purchased as part of Peoples’ overall interest risk positioning in anticipation of rising interest
rates. In 2010, the sustained low interest rate environment negatively affected the yields on these securities. As a result,
Peoples sold its entire holdings of U.S. government-backed student loan pools, which produced a net gain of $5.7 million.
All but $12 million of these securities were sold as part of the third quarter deleveraging.
A significant portion of Peoples’ residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities are comprised of securities
either guaranteed by the U.S. government or issued by U.S. government-sponsored agencies, such as Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac. The remaining portion of Peoples’ mortgage-backed securities consists of securities issued by other entities,
including other financial institutions, which are not guaranteed by the U.S. government.
41
The following table details Peoples’ investment in these “non-agency” securities at December 31:
(Dollars in thousands)
Residential
Commercial
Total fair value
Total amortized cost
Net unrealized gain (loss)
2010
$ 113,559
26,090
$ 139,649
$ 136,997
2,652
$
2009
$ 153,621
24,188
$ 177,809
$ 177,370
439
$
2008
$ 192,133
25,951
$ 218,084
$ 231,153
$ (13,069)
2007
46,990
–
46,990
47,757
(767)
$
$
$
$
2006
38,928
–
38,928
39,952
(1,024)
$
$
$
$
The non-agency portfolio consists entirely of first lien residential and commercial mortgages and all securities are rated
AAA or equivalent by Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s or Fitch. Approximately 96% of the portfolio consists of 2003 or
earlier originations and 88% of the portfolio consists of underlying fixed-rate mortgages.
At December 31, 2010, Peoples’ investment in individual bank-issued trust preferred securities consisted of holdings of
seven unrelated issuers. All of these securities remain current on contractual interest payment. In addition, an aggregate of
$10 million of these securities relate to issuers involved in the comprehensive capital assessment conducted by federal bank
supervisors in the first half of 2009 – known as the Supervisory Capital Assessment Program or “government stress test”.
Peoples’ investment in preferred stocks in prior years was comprised entirely of stocks issued by Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac. During 2008, Peoples systematically sold these preferred stocks due to the uncertainty surrounding these
entities, with the last sales occurring in July 2008. As a result, Peoples no longer maintains any equity holdings in either
Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.
Peoples previously invested in CDO securities issued by special purpose vehicles holding pools of collateral consisting
of trust preferred and subordinated debt securities issued by banks, bank holding companies, insurance companies and real
estate investment trusts. CDO securities are generally segregated into several classes, known as tranches, with the typical
structure including senior, mezzanine and equity tranches. In these structures, an investor holding the equity tranche has
the first loss position. Interest and principal collected from the collateral is distributed with a priority that provides the
highest level of protection to the senior-most tranches. In order to provide a high level of protection to the senior tranches,
cash flows are diverted to higher-level tranches if certain tests are not met. Peoples’ CDO investment had been limited to
two lower mezzanine tranche CDO securities issued in 2006 and 2007 and two equity tranche CDO securities issued in
2002 and 2003. In 2009, management determined the mezzanine tranche CDO securities were total losses based on the
cash flows expected to be received, while the equity tranche CDO securities were deemed total losses in the first quarter of
2010.
At December 31, 2010, Peoples’ investment portfolio included two qualified school construction bonds, of which one
was purchased during the fourth quarter of 2009 and the other in January 2010. Qualified school construction bonds were
created under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 enacted during the first quarter of 2009. Holders of
these bonds receive federal income tax credits in lieu of interest, which significantly reduces borrowing costs for public
school construction projects. The federal income tax credit rate is fixed for the life of the bonds. However, there currently
exists uncertainty regarding ownership rights of associated tax credits if the bonds are sold or transferred. Given this
uncertainty, management intends to hold these securities until maturity and believes Peoples has the ability to do
so. Consequently, these securities were designated as “held-to-maturity” at the time of their purchase.
Additional information regarding Peoples’ investment portfolio can be found in Note 3 of the Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Loans
The following table details total outstanding loans at December 31:
(Dollars in thousands)
Year-end loan balances:
Commercial real estate
Commercial and industrial
Residential real estate
Real estate construction
Home equity lines of credit
Consumer
Deposit account overdrafts
Total loans
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
$
$
452,875
153,192
200,275
22,478
48,130
81,567
2,201
960,718
$
503,034
159,915
215,735
32,427
49,183
90,144
1,620
$ 1,052,058
$
478,298
178,834
231,778
77,917
47,635
87,902
1,668
$ 1,104,032
$
513,847
171,937
237,641
71,794
42,706
80,544
2,472
$ 1,120,941
$
469,934
191,847
252,726
99,311
44,937
72,531
1,108
$ 1,132,394
42
(Dollars in thousands)
Average total loans
Average allowance for loan losses
Average loans, net of allowance
2010
$ 1,029,903
(29,597)
$ 1,000,306
2009
$ 1,093,057
(25,081)
$ 1,067,976
2008
$ 1,113,247
(17,428)
$ 1,095,819
2007
$ 1,122,808
(14,775)
$ 1,108,033
2006
$ 1,108,575
(15,216)
$ 1,093,359
Percent of loans to total loans at December 31:
Commercial real estate
Commercial and industrial
Residential real estate
Real estate construction
Home equity lines of credit
Consumer
Deposit account overdrafts
Total percentage
47.1%
15.9%
20.8%
2.3%
5.0%
8.7%
0.2%
100.0%
47.8%
15.2%
20.5%
3.1%
4.7%
8.5%
0.2%
100.0%
43.3%
16.2%
21.0%
7.1%
4.3%
7.9%
0.2%
100.0%
45.8%
15.3%
21.2%
6.4%
3.8%
7.3%
0.2%
100.0%
41.5%
16.9%
22.3%
8.8%
4.0%
6.4%
0.1%
100.0%
Peoples’ ability to maintain loan balances has been negatively impacted by lower demand for new loans as a result of
unfavorable economic conditions that have persisted in Peoples’ primary market area since late 2007. As a result,
commercial loan payoffs have exceeded new production, while charge-offs have remained elevated. In 2010, Peoples also
focused on managing commercial real estate loan exposures to enhance its overall balance sheet risk profile. These factors
have accounted for much of the decline in commercial loan balances since year-end 2007. During the fourth quarter of
2009, several large commercial construction loans, with total outstanding balances of approximately $40 million, were
converted to term commercial mortgage loans, causing corresponding changes in commercial mortgage and real estate
construction loan balances in 2009.
The following table details the maturities of Peoples’ commercial and construction loans at December 31, 2010:
(Dollars in thousands)
Loan Type
Commercial real estate:
Fixed
Variable
Total
Commercial and industrial
Fixed
Variable
Total
Real estate construction:
Fixed
Variable
Total
Due in One
Year or
Less
Due in One
to Five
Years
Due After
Five Years
Total
$
$
$
$
$
$
21,616
31,972
53,588
13,317
42,773
56,090
1,509
884
2,393
$
65,588
35,908
$ 101,496
$
75,380
222,411
$ 297,791
$ 162,584
290,291
$ 452,875
$
$
$
$
54,810
17,823
72,633
3,385
1,045
4,430
$
$
$
$
12,162
12,307
24,469
9,400
6,255
15,655
$
80,289
72,903
$ 153,192
$
$
14,294
8,184
22,478
Peoples’ real estate loan balances have declined steadily over the last several years due to customer demand for long-
term, fixed-rate mortgages, which Peoples generally sells to the secondary market. In parts of 2009 and 2010, Peoples
experienced significant refinancing activity in response to historically low long-term fixed rates available in the secondary
market. This activity included existing residential real estate loans held in Peoples’ loan portfolio being refinanced with the
new loan being sold to the secondary market. Peoples predominately has retained servicing rights on sold loans. As a
result, Peoples’ serviced loan portfolio was $250.6 million and $227.8 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively, representing increases of 10% in 2010 and 26% in 2009.
In prior years, Peoples experienced steady growth in consumer loan balances, due mainly to the efforts in indirect
lending. Peoples’ indirect lending activity involves the origination of consumer loans primarily through automobile dealers
and comprises a significant portion of its total consumer loans. In 2010, indirect lending activity slowed due to competition
from larger financial institution, coupled with decreased consumer spending due to economic conditions. Management
remains committed to originating quality consumer loans based on sound underwriting practices and appropriate loan
pricing discipline, which could limit opportunities for future growth.
43
Loan Concentration
Peoples categorizes its commercial loans according to standard industry classifications and monitors for concentrations
in a single industry or multiple industries that could be impacted by changes in economic conditions in a similar manner.
Peoples’ commercial lending activities continue to be spread over a diverse range of businesses from all sectors of the
economy, with no single industry comprising over 10% of Peoples’ total loan portfolio.
Loans secured by commercial real estate, including commercial construction loans, continue to comprise nearly half of
Peoples’ loan portfolio. The following table provides information regarding the largest concentrations of commercial real
estate loans within the loan portfolio:
(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial real estate
Lodging and lodging related
Office buildings and complexes:
Owner occupied
Non-owner occupied
Total office buildings and complexes
Apartment complexes
Retail facilities:
Owner occupied
Non-owner occupied
Total retail facilities
Residential property:
Owner occupied
Non-owner occupied
Total residential property
Light industrial facilities:
Owner occupied
Non-owner occupied
Total light industrial facilities
Assisted living facilities and nursing homes
Land and land development
Health care facilities
Other
Total commercial real estate
Real estate construction:
Assisted living facilities and nursing homes
Lodging and lodging related
Land and land development
Other
Total real estate construction
$
$
$
Outstanding
Balance
Loan
Commitments
Total
Exposure
% of
Total
$
68,443
$
170
$
68,613
14.9%
6,769
34,062
40,831
56,012
9,635
28,293
37,928
3,426
29,137
32,563
22,028
10,971
32,999
33,535
24,724
18,950
106,890
452,875
5,307
–
4,104
13,067
22,478
$
$
$
304
155
459
787
110
395
505
523
108
631
120
–
120
–
2,970
26
2,746
8,414
3,625
–
455
1,991
6,071
$
$
$
7,073
34,217
41,290
56,799
9,745
28,688
38,433
3,949
29,245
33,194
22,148
10,971
33,119
33,535
27,694
18,976
109,636
461,289
8,932
–
4,559
15,058
28,549
1.5%
7.4%
9.0%
12.3%
2.1%
6.2%
8.3%
0.9%
6.3%
7.2%
4.8%
2.4%
7.2%
7.3%
6.0%
4.1%
23.8%
100.0%
31.3%
0.0%
16.0%
52.7%
100.0%
Peoples’ commercial lending activities continue to focus on lending opportunities inside its primary market areas, with
loans outside Peoples’ primary market areas comprising approximately 10% of total outstanding loan balances, at both
December 31, 2010 and 2009. The majority of those out-of-market loans are still based in Ohio, West Virginia and
Kentucky, with total outstanding balances of $67.8 million and $77.9 million at year-end 2010 and 2009, respectively. In
all other states, the aggregate outstanding balance in each state was less than $4.0 million at December 31, 2010.
44
Allowance for Loan Losses
The following table details the changes in the allowance for loan losses for the years ended December 31:
(Dollars in thousands)
Allowance for loan losses:
Allowance for loan losses, January 1
Gross charge-offs:
Commercial real estate
Commercial and industrial
Residential real estate
Real estate construction
Home equity lines of credit
Consumer
Deposit account overdrafts
Total gross charge-offs
Recoveries:
Commercial real estate
Commercial and industrial
Residential real estate
Real estate construction
Home equity lines of credit
Consumer
Deposit account overdrafts
Total recoveries
Net charge-offs (recoveries):
Commercial real estate
Commercial and industrial
Residential real estate
Real estate construction
Home equity lines of credit
Consumer
Deposit account overdrafts
Total net charge-offs
Provision for loan losses, December 31
Allowance for loan losses, December 31
$
Net charge-offs to average loans:
Commercial real estate
Commercial and industrial
Residential real estate
Real estate construction
Home equity lines of credit
Consumer
Deposit account overdrafts
Total net charge-offs to average loans
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
$
27,257
$
22,931
$
15,718
$
14,509
$
14,720
25,568
1,281
1,129
68
131
1,074
929
30,180
1,322
220
225
–
34
671
301
2,773
24,246
1,061
904
68
97
403
628
27,407
26,916
26,766
2.35%
0.10%
0.09%
0.01%
0.01%
0.04%
0.06%
2.66%
18,802
817
1,544
–
82
1,381
1,294
23,920
1,162
91
257
–
55
584
376
2,525
17,640
726
1,287
–
27
797
918
21,395
25,721
27,257
1.61%
0.07%
0.12%
0.00%
0.00%
0.07%
0.09%
1.96%
$
16,138
1,923
1,524
–
145
941
1,298
21,969
278
239
121
156
27
388
333
1,542
15,860
1,684
1,403
(156)
118
553
965
20,427
27,640
22,931
1.42%
0.15%
0.13%
-0.01%
0.01%
0.04%
0.09%
1.83%
892
1,056
864
53
400
587
849
4,701
245
662
214
54
144
352
280
1,951
647
394
650
(1)
256
235
569
2,750
3,959
15,718
0.06%
0.04%
0.06%
0.00%
0.02%
0.02%
0.05%
0.25%
1,620
550
842
855
82
528
1,007
5,484
269
319
406
–
18
336
303
1,651
1,351
231
436
855
64
192
704
3,833
3,622
14,509
0.12%
0.02%
0.04%
0.08%
0.01%
0.02%
0.06%
0.35%
$
$
$
The amount of the allowance for loan losses for the various loan types represents management’s estimate of expected
losses from existing loans. These estimates are based upon the formal quarterly analysis of the loan portfolio described in
the “Critical Accounting Policies” section of this discussion. While allocations are made to specific loans and pools of
loans, the allowance is available for all loan losses.
45
The following details the allocation of the allowance for loan losses:
(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial real estate
Commercial and industrial
Total commercial
Residential real estate
Home equity lines of credit
Consumer
Deposit account overdrafts
$
$
Total allowance for loan losses
$
As a percentage of total loans
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
21,806
2,160
23,966
1,400
431
721
248
26,766
2.79%
$
$
$
22,125
1,586
23,711
1,619
528
1,074
325
27,257
2.59%
$
$
19,757
1,414
526
789
445
22,931
2.08%
$
$
14,147
419
433
435
284
15,718
1.40%
$
$
12,661
957
247
349
295
14,509
1.28%
Given the continued rate of loss being experienced on commercial real estate loans, in the fourth quarter of 2009,
management refined its methodology for estimating inherent losses on Peoples’ commercial loans by performing separate
evaluations of, and allocations for, commercial real estate loans and other commercial loans. This refinement, which did
not have a significant impact on the overall allowance for loan losses, included a separate analysis of lodging and lodging
related loans – Peoples' largest industrial concentration.
The significant allocations to commercial loans reflects the higher credit risk associated with this type of lending and
the size of this loan category in relationship to the entire loan portfolio. The higher allocations since year-end 2007
primarily reflect higher loss factors for graded loans due to the elevated level of charge-offs in each of the last three years,
along with continued deterioration in credit quality of various commercial loans based on the financial condition of the
borrowers. Another significant contributing factor was the impact of distressed commercial real estate values and general
economic conditions on specific reserves for impaired loans.
The allowance allocated to the residential real estate and consumer loan categories is based upon Peoples’ allowance
methodology for homogeneous pools of loans. The fluctuations in these allocations have been directionally consistent with
the changes in loan quality, loss experience and changes in loan balances in each category.
The following table details Peoples’ nonperforming assets at December 31:
(Dollars in thousands)
Loans 90+ days past due and accruing:
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
$
Commercial real estate
Commercial and industrial
Residential real estate
Consumer
Total
Renegotiated loans
Nonaccrual loans:
Commercial real estate
Commercial and industrial
Residential real estate
Home equity
Consumer
Total nonaccrual loans
Total nonperforming loans (NPLs)
Other real estate owned (OREO)
Commercial
Residential
Total other real estate owned
Total nonperforming assets (NPAs)
$
NPLs as a percent of total loans
NPAs as a percent of total assets
NPAs as a precent of gross loans and OREO
Allowance for loan losses as a percent of NPLs
$
$
164
–
238
9
411
–
25,852
2,884
4,687
546
3
33,972
34,383
6,087
226
6,313
40,696
3.27%
2.03%
3.85%
79.3%
–
–
–
–
–
–
36,768
1,734
2,271
543
4
41,320
41,320
378
147
525
41,845
3.74%
2.09%
3.79%
55.5%
$
$
–
378
–
–
378
–
4,832
656
2,906
583
3
8,980
9,358
–
343
343
9,701
0.83%
0.51%
0.87%
168.0%
$
$
–
–
–
1
1
1,218
5,346
34
3,071
327
7
8,785
10,004
–
–
–
10,004
0.88%
0.53%
0.88%
145.0%
$
$
–
–
27
–
27
–
34,392
1,714
3,790
554
–
40,450
40,477
4,280
215
4,495
44,972
4.19%
2.45%
4.64%
66.1%
46
In 2009, Peoples completed the foreclosure process on two unrelated commercial real estate loans by acquiring
ownership of the property securing the loan. This action resulted in the loans being reclassified as other real estate owned
at December 31, 2009. These properties continued to be held throughout 2010, although continued weakness in the
commercial real estate market resulted in write-downs on these properties in 2010.
Peoples’ nonaccrual commercial real estate loans primarily consist of non-owner occupied commercial properties and
real estate development projects. In general, management believes repayment of these loans is dependent on sale of the
underlying collateral. As such, the carrying values of these loans are ultimately supported by management’s estimate of the
net proceeds Peoples would receive upon the sale of the collateral. These estimates are based in part on market values
provided by independent, licensed or certified appraisers periodically, but no less frequently than annually. Given the
sustained weakness in commercial real estate values, management continues to monitor changes in real estate values from
quarter-to-quarter and updates its estimates as needed based on observable changes in market prices and/or updated
appraisals for similar properties.
At December 31, 2010, Peoples’ nonaccrual commercial real estate loans included three loans to a single commercial
borrower that were reclassified as held-for-sale in mid-2010. The value of these loans declined in subsequent quarters
resulting in these loans being written down to their estimated fair value. At December 31, 2010, the loans had a total
carrying value of $1.0 million.
While the level of nonperforming loans has remained elevated over the last three years, the majority of nonperforming
loans were carried at the estimated net realizable fair value of their underlying collateral as a result of charge-offs. As a
result, Peoples has experienced a lower allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans ratio compared to Peoples’
historical levels.
Interest income on loans classified as nonaccrual and renegotiated at each year-end that would have been recorded
under the original terms of the loans was $2.6 million for 2010 and $1.9 million for both 2009 and 2008, of which $0;
$41,000 and $20,000, respectively, was actually recorded consistent with the income recognition policy described in the
“Critical Accounting Policies” section of this discussion.
Deposits
Peoples’ deposit balances were comprised of the following at December 31:
(Dollars in thousands)
Retail certificates of deposit
Money market deposit accounts
Savings accounts
Governmental/public funds
Interest-bearing transaction accounts
Total retail interest-bearing deposits
Brokered certificates of deposits
Total interest-bearing deposits
Non-interest-bearing deposits
Total deposit balances
2010
430,886
289,657
122,444
119,572
96,507
1,059,066
87,465
1,146,531
215,069
1,361,600
$
$
2009
480,512
263,257
112,074
147,745
91,878
1,095,466
102,420
1,197,886
198,000
1,395,886
$
$
2008
518,401
213,498
105,714
105,932
90,873
1,034,418
151,910
1,186,328
180,040
1,366,368
$
$
2007
499,684
153,299
101,039
91,558
106,151
951,731
59,589
1,011,320
175,057
1,186,377
$
$
2006
514,885
134,387
106,757
78,900
98,551
933,480
129,128
1,062,608
170,921
1,233,529
$
$
During 2010, management focused on reducing higher-cost, non-core deposits given recent growth in lower-cost
deposits and lack of loan growth. This strategy has included more selective pricing of long-term certificates of deposit
(“CDs”), governmental/public fund deposits and similar non-core deposits, as well as reductions in brokered deposits from
not renewing maturing deposits. These actions accounted for much of the decline in these deposit categories. Peoples’
ability to retain retail CDs over the last several years has been challenged by progressively intense competition for deposits
within its markets. In 2008, retail CD growth occurred primarily as a result of customers depositing funds with Peoples
through the Certificate of Deposit Account Registry System, or CDARS, program, which totaled $35.7 million.
Savings and money market deposit balances were higher in 2009 and 2010 due largely to customer preference for
insured deposits over short-term investment alternatives. A contributing factor to the higher money market balances has
been the impact of Peoples offering a consumer money market product with a very competitive rate. In late 2008, Peoples
experienced an influx of funds associated with its wealth management activities, as the ultra-low short-term interest rates
caused certain money market funds maintained by third-parties to be closed to new deposits. While a substantial portion of
these deposits were still maintained at year-end 2010, Peoples' ability to retain these funds remains dependent upon
alternative investment options available to its wealth management clients. Consequently, the amounts of Peoples’ money
market deposits could change unexpectedly in future periods.
47
Peoples' governmental/public funds represent savings and interest-bearing transaction account deposits from state and
local governmental entities. These funds are subject to periodic fluctuations based on the timing of tax collections and
subsequent expenditures or disbursements. While these balances increased in 2009, Peoples continues to emphasize growth
of low-cost deposits that do not require Peoples to pledge assets as collateral, such as government/public funds.
Over the last several years, Peoples has focused on expanding core deposit balances as a means of reducing reliance on
typically higher-costing, wholesale funding sources. As a result, non-interest-bearing deposit balances have experienced
steady growth.
The maturities of CDs with total balances of $100,000 or more at December 31 were as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
3 months or less
Over 3 to 6 months
Over 6 to 12 months
Over 12 months
Total
2010
$
36,719
18,767
54,833
91,682
$ 202,001
2009
$
60,882
25,637
35,412
93,002
$ 214,933
2008
$
66,757
50,545
54,610
63,345
$ 235,257
2007
$
42,809
33,411
24,718
43,386
$ 144,324
2006
$
26,601
47,738
59,084
89,049
$ 222,472
Borrowed Funds
Total short-term borrowings decreased $25.4 million, or 33%, in 2010, as Peoples used funds generated from retail
deposit growth to eliminate all overnight wholesale borrowings. Total long-term borrowings also decreased 33% in 2010,
with outstanding balances of $180.3 million at year-end. The reduction in long-term borrowings was the result of
management's planned deleveraging of the balance sheet, which included the early repayment of wholesale repurchase
agreements in the third quarter of 2010. Peoples also repaid maturing long-term borrowings in 2010 using excess cash
reserves. Additional information regarding Peoples’ borrowed funds can be found in Notes 8 and 9 of the Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Capital/Stockholders' Equity
At December 31, 2010, capital levels for both Peoples and Peoples Bank remained substantially higher than the
minimum amounts needed to be considered well capitalized institutions under banking regulations. These higher capital
levels reflect Peoples' desire to maintain strong capital positions throughout the current credit cycle and economic downturn
to provide greater flexibility to work through asset quality issues that have arisen. The Partial TARP Capital Redemption
will not have an adverse impact on capital levels or regulatory ratios for Peoples Bank. Peoples' Tier 1 capital and total
risk-based capital ratios would have approximated 15.00% and 16.40%, respectively, had the repayment occurred on
December 31, 2010. Further information regarding Peoples and Peoples Bank’s risk-based capital ratios can be found in
Note 17 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
In 2010, Peoples declared cash dividends of $0.40 per common share versus $0.66 per common share in 2009. This
decrease reflects the reduction in the quarterly dividend in the second half of 2009 to $0.10 per common share versus the
$0.23 per common share paid in earlier quarters. The decision to reduce the quarterly cash dividend was based largely on
Peoples’ desire to preserve capital by maintaining a dividend payout consistent with projected short-term earning levels.
Peoples historically has paid between 30% and 50% of quarterly earnings as dividends to shareholders. However,
future dividend payments will continue to be determined each quarter based upon Peoples’ performance and capital
needs. In addition, other restrictions and limitations may prohibit Peoples from paying dividends even when sufficient cash
is available. Further discussion regarding restrictions on Peoples’ ability to pay future dividends can be found in Note 17 of
the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, as well as the “Supervision and Regulation –TARP Capital Purchase
Program” and “Supervision and Regulation – Dividend Restrictions” sections under Item 1 of this Form 10-K.
In addition to traditional capital measurements, management uses tangible equity ratios to evaluate the adequacy of
Peoples’ stockholders’ equity. Such ratios represent non-GAAP financial information since their calculation removes the
impact of intangible assets acquired through acquisitions on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Management believes this
information is useful to investors since it facilitates the comparison of Peoples’ operating performance, financial condition
and trends to peers, especially those without a similar level of intangible assets as Peoples. The following table reconciles
the calculation of these non-GAAP financial measures to amounts reported in Peoples’ Consolidated Financial Statements:
48
(Dollars in thousands)
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
Tangible Equity:
Total stockholders' equity, as reported
Less: goodwill and other intangible assets
Tangible equity
Tangible Common Equity:
Tangible equity
Less: preferred stockholders' equity
Tangible common equity
Tangible Assets:
Total assets, as reported
Less: goodwill and other intangible assets
Tangible assets
Tangible Book Value per Share:
Tangible common equity
Common shares outstanding
$
$
$
$
230,681
64,870
165,811
165,811
38,645
127,166
$
$
1,837,985
64,870
1,773,115
$
$
$
$
$
$
243,968
65,599
178,369
178,369
38,543
139,826
2,001,827
65,599
1,936,228
$
$
$
$
$
$
186,626
66,406
120,220
120,220
-
120,220
$
$
$
$
202,836
68,029
134,807
134,807
-
134,807
$
$
$
$
197,169
68,852
128,317
128,317
-
128,317
2,002,338
66,406
1,935,932
$
$
1,885,553
68,029
1,817,524
$
$
1,875,255
68,852
1,806,403
$
127,166
10,457,327
$
139,826
10,374,637
$
120,220
10,333,884
134,807
$
10,296,748
128,317
$
10,651,985
Tangible book value per share
$
12.16
Tangible Equity to Tangible Assets Ratio:
Tangible equity
Total tangible assets
$
$
165,811
1,773,115
$
$
$
13.48
178,369
1,936,228
$
$
$
11.63
$
13.09
$
12.05
120,220
1,935,932
$
$
134,807
1,817,524
$
$
128,317
1,806,403
Tangible equity to tangible assets
9.35%
9.21%
6.21%
7.42%
7.10%
Tangible Common Equity to Tangible Assets Ratio:
Tangible common equity
Tangible assets
127,166
1,773,115
$
$
$
$
139,826
1,936,228
$
$
120,220
1,935,932
$
$
134,807
1,817,524
$
$
128,317
1,806,403
Tangible common equity to tangible assets
7.17%
7.22%
6.21%
7.42%
7.10%
Interest Rate Sensitivity and Liquidity
While Peoples is exposed to various business risks, the risks relating to interest rate sensitivity and liquidity are
typically the most complex and dynamic risks that can materially impact future results of operations and financial
condition. The objective of Peoples’ asset/liability management (“ALM”) function is to measure and manage these risks in
order to optimize net interest income within the constraints of prudent capital adequacy, liquidity and safety. This objective
requires Peoples to focus on interest rate risk exposure and adequate liquidity through its management of the mix of assets
and liabilities, their related cash flows and the rates earned and paid on those assets and liabilities. Ultimately, the ALM
function is intended to guide management in the acquisition and disposition of earning assets and selection of appropriate
funding sources.
InterestRateRisk
Interest rate risk (“IRR”) is one of the most significant risks arising in the normal course of business of financial
services companies like Peoples. IRR is the potential for economic loss due to future interest rate changes that can
impact both the earnings stream as well as market values of financial assets and liabilities. Peoples’ exposure to IRR is
due primarily to differences in the maturity or repricing of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. In addition,
other factors, such as prepayments of loans and investment securities or early withdrawal of deposits, can expose
Peoples to IRR and increase interest costs or reduce revenue streams.
Peoples has assigned overall management of IRR to the ALCO, which has established an IRR management policy
that sets minimum thresholds and guidelines for monitoring and managing the level and amount of IRR. The objective
of Peoples’ IRR policy is to assist the ALCO in its evaluation of the impact of changing interest rate conditions on
earnings and economic value of equity, as well as assist with the implementation of strategies intended to reduce
Peoples’ IRR. The management of IRR involves either maintaining or changing the level of risk exposure by changing
the repricing and maturity characteristics of the cash flows for specific assets or liabilities.
49
The ALCO uses various methods to assess and monitor the current level of Peoples’ IRR and the impact of
potential strategies or other changes. However, the ALCO predominantly relies on simulation modeling in its overall
management of IRR since it is a dynamic measure. Simulation modeling also estimates the impact of potential changes
in interest rates and balance sheet structures on future earnings and projected fair value of equity.
The modeling process starts with a base case simulation using the current balance sheet and current interest rates
held constant for the next twelve months. Alternate scenarios are prepared which simulate the impact of increasing and
decreasing market interest rates, assuming parallel yield curve shifts. Comparisons produced from the simulation data,
showing the changes in net interest income from the base interest rate scenario, illustrate the risks associated with the
current balance sheet structure. Additional simulations, when deemed appropriate or necessary, are prepared using
different interest rate scenarios from those used with the base case simulation and/or possible changes in balance sheet
composition. Comparisons showing the earnings and equity value variance from the base case are provided to the
ALCO for review and discussion.
The ALCO has established limits on changes in net interest income and the economic value of equity. In general,
the ALCO limits the decrease in net interest income to 15% or less from base case for each 200 basis point shift in
interest rates measured over a twelve-month period. The ALCO limits the negative impact on net equity to 20% or less
given an immediate and sustained 200 basis point shift in interest rates.
The following table illustrates the estimated impact of an immediate and sustained change in interest rates (dollars
in thousands):
Increase in
Interest Rate
(in Basis Points)
300
200
100
Impact on
Net Interest Income
Impact on
Economic Value of Equity
December 31, 2009
December 31, 2010
$
8,973
6,860
4,048
17.2 % $
13.2 %
7.8 %
2,836
3,010
2,100
4.6 %
4.8 %
3.4 %
December 31, 2010
$ (9,005)
(3,297)
1,599
(3.9)% $
(1.4)%
0.7 %
December 31, 2009
2,974
9,730
9,447
1.1 %
3.5 %
3.4 %
This table uses a standard, parallel shock analysis for assessing the IRR to net interest income and the economic
value of equity. A parallel shock means all points on the yield curve (one year, two year, three year, etc.) are
directionally shocked the same amount of basis points – 100 basis points is equal to 1%. While management regularly
assesses the impact of both increasing and decreasing interest rates, the table above only reflects the impact of upward
shocks due to the fact a downward parallel shock of 100 basis points or more is not possible given that some short-term
rates are currently less than 1%.
Although a parallel shock table can give insight into the current direction and magnitude of IRR inherent in the
balance sheet, interest rates do not always move in a complete parallel manner during interest rate cycles. These
nonparallel movements in interest rates, commonly called yield curve steepening or flattening movements, tend to
occur during the beginning and end of an interest rate cycle. As a result, management conducts more advanced interest
rate shock scenarios to gain a better understanding of Peoples’ exposure to nonparallel rate shifts.
Given the inherent uncertainty surrounding the timing and magnitude of future interest rate changes,
management’s near-term balance sheet strategies will continue to emphasize maintaining good asset liquidity and
lowering overall funding costs through a combination of less aggressive pricing of non-core funding and growing low
cost retail deposits.
Liquidity
In addition to IRR management, another major objective of the ALCO is to maintain a sufficient level of liquidity.
The ALCO defines liquidity as the ability to meet anticipated and unanticipated operating cash needs, loan demand and
deposit withdrawals, without incurring a sustained negative impact on profitability. The ALCO’s liquidity
management policy sets limits on the net liquidity position and the concentration of non-core funding sources, both
wholesale funding and brokered deposits.
Typically, the main source of liquidity for Peoples is deposit growth. Liquidity is also provided by cash generated
from earning assets such as maturities, calls, principal payments and interest income from loans and investment
securities. Peoples also uses various wholesale funding sources to supplement funding from customer deposits. These
external sources also provide Peoples with the ability to obtain large quantities of funds in a relatively short time period
in the event of sudden unanticipated cash needs. Peoples also has a contingency funding plan that serves as an action
plan for management in the event of a short-term or long-term funding crisis caused by a single or series of unexpected
events.
50
At December 31, 2010, Peoples had available borrowing capacity through its wholesale funding sources and
unpledged investment securities totaling approximately $286 million that can be used to satisfy liquidity needs. This
liquidity position excluded the $44 million excess cash reserves at the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland and the
impact of Peoples’ ability to obtain additional funding by either offering higher rates on retail deposits or issuing
additional brokered deposits. Management believes the current balance of cash and cash equivalents and anticipated
cash flows from the investment portfolio, along with the availability of other funding sources, will allow Peoples to
meet anticipated cash obligations, as well as special needs and off-balance sheet commitments.
Off-Balance Sheet Activities and Contractual Obligations
Peoples routinely engages in activities that involve, to varying degrees, elements of risk not reflected in whole or in
part in the Consolidated Financial Statements. These activities are part of Peoples’ normal course of business and include
traditional off-balance sheet credit-related financial instruments, interest rate contracts, operating leases, long-term debt and
commitments to make additional capital contributions in low-income housing tax credit investments.
The following is a summary of Peoples’ significant off-balance sheet activities and contractual obligations. Detailed
information regarding these activities and obligations can be found in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as
follows:
Activity or Obligation
Off-balance sheet credit-related financial instruments
Low-income housing tax credit investments
Operating lease obligations
Long-term debt obligations
Junior subordinated notes held by subsidiary trust
Note
16
16
5
9
10
Traditional off-balance sheet credit-related financial instruments are primarily commitments to extend credit and
standby letters of credit. These activities are necessary to meet the financing needs of customers and could require Peoples
to make cash payments to third parties in the event certain specified future events occur. The contractual amounts represent
the extent of Peoples’ exposure in these off-balance sheet activities. However, since certain off-balance sheet
commitments, particularly standby letters of credit, are expected to expire or only partially be used, the total amount of
commitments does not necessarily represent future cash requirements.
Peoples also has commitments to make additional capital contributions in low-income housing tax credit funds,
consisting of a pool of low-income housing projects. As a limited partner in these funds, Peoples receives federal income
tax benefits, which assist Peoples in managing its overall tax burden. Since the future contributions are conditioned on
certain future events, the total amount of future equity contributions at December 31, 2010, is not reflected on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Peoples continues to lease certain facilities and equipment under noncancellable operating leases with terms providing
for fixed monthly payments over periods generally ranging from two to ten years. Several of Peoples’ leased facilities are
inside retail shopping centers or office buildings and, as a result, are not available for purchase. Management believes these
leased facilities increase Peoples’ visibility within its markets and afford sales associates additional access to current and
potential clients.
The following table details the aggregate amount of future payments Peoples is required to make under certain
contractual obligations as of December 31, 2010:
(Dollars in thousands)
Long-term debt (1)
Junior subordinated notes held by
subsidiary trust (1)
Operating leases
Time deposits
Total
157,703
$
Less than 1
year
15,391
$
22,565
5,555
518,351
704,174
–
865
242,222
$ 258,478
Payments due by period
1-3 years
9,632
$
3-5 years
3,187
$
–
1,714
184,794
$ 196,140
–
1,033
60,029
64,249
$
More than
5 years
$ 129,493
22,565
1,943
31,306
$ 185,307
Total
(1) Amounts reflect solely the minimum required principal payments.
$
51
Management does not anticipate Peoples’ current off-balance sheet activities and contractual obligations will have a
material impact on future results of operations and financial condition based on past experience.
Effects of Inflation on Financial Statements
Substantially all of Peoples’ assets relate to banking and are monetary in nature. As a result, inflation does not impact
Peoples to the same degree as companies in capital-intensive industries in a replacement cost environment. During a period
of rising prices, a net monetary asset position results in a loss in purchasing power and conversely a net monetary liability
position results in an increase in purchasing power. The opposite would be true during a period of decreasing prices. In the
banking industry, monetary assets typically exceed monetary liabilities. The current monetary policy targeting low levels
of inflation has resulted in relatively stable price levels. Therefore, inflation has had little impact on Peoples’ net assets.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Please refer to the section captioned “Interest Rate Sensitivity and Liquidity” under Item 7 of this Form 10-K, which
section is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes, and the report of independent registered public
accounting firm, are set forth immediately following Item 9B of this Form 10-K.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
No response required.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Peoples’ management, with the participation of Peoples’ President and Chief Executive Officer and Peoples’ Executive
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, has evaluated the effectiveness of Peoples’ disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) (the
“Exchange Act”) as of December 31, 2010. Based upon that evaluation, Peoples’ President and Chief Executive Officer
and Peoples’ Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer have concluded that:
(a)
information required to be disclosed by Peoples in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and other reports Peoples
files or submits under the Exchange Act would be accumulated and communicated to Peoples’ management,
including its President and Chief Executive Officer and its Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure;
(b) information required to be disclosed by Peoples in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and other reports Peoples
files or submits under the Exchange Act would be recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the
timeframe specified in the SEC’s rules and forms; and
(c) Peoples’ disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The “Report of Management’s Assessment of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting” required by Item 308(a) of
SEC Regulation S-K is included on page 54 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Attestation Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The “Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Effectiveness of Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting” required by Item 308(b) of SEC Regulation S-K is included on page 55 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
52
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
During the fourth quarter of Peoples’ fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, no changes were made in Peoples’ internal
control over financial reporting that have materially effected, or are reasonably likely to materially effect, Peoples’ internal
control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
53
Report of Management’s Assessment of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Peoples’ management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial
reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Peoples’ internal control over financial reporting has been designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation, integrity, and fair presentation of Peoples’ Consolidated Financial
Statements for external purposes in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles.
With the supervision and participation of its President and Chief Executive Officer and its Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, management evaluated the effectiveness of Peoples’ internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, using the framework set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
No matter how well designed, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect all misstatements.
Projection of the evaluation of effectiveness to future periods is subject to risks, including but not limited to (a)
controls may become inadequate due to changes in conditions; (b) a deterioration in the degree of compliance with
policies or procedures; and (c) the possibility of control circumvention or override, any of which may lead to
misstatements due to undetected error or fraud. Effective internal control over financial reporting can provide only a
reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and reporting.
Management assessed the effectiveness of Peoples’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010,
and, based on this assessment, has concluded Peoples’ internal control over financial reporting is effective as of that
date.
Peoples’ independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP has audited the Consolidated Financial
Statements included in this Annual Report and has issued an attestation report on Peoples’ internal control over
financial reporting.
/s/ DAVID L. MEAD
David L. Mead
President and Chief Executive Officer
/s/ EDWARD G. SLOANE
Edward G. Sloane
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
54
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Effectiveness of Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors and Shareholders
Peoples Bancorp, Inc.
We have audited Peoples Bancorp Inc. and subsidiaries internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Peoples Bancorp Inc. and subsidiaries’ management
is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Report of Management’s
Assessment of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United
States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining
an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing
and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing
such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding
the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance
with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding
prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company’s assets that could have
a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate.
In our opinion, Peoples Bancorp Inc. and subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United
States), the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of
income, statements of stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December
31, 2010, of Peoples Bancorp Inc. and subsidiaries and our report dated February 28, 2011 expressed an unqualified
opinion thereon.
Charleston, West Virginia
February 28, 2011
55
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Consolidated Financial Statements
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors and the Shareholders
Peoples Bancorp Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Peoples Bancorp Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010. These financial statements are the responsibility
of the Peoples Bancorp Inc.’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements
based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of Peoples Bancorp Inc. and subsidiaries at December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the consolidated
results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010, in
conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United
States), Peoples Bancorp Inc. and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010,
based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 28, 2011 expressed an unqualified opinion
thereon.
Charleston, West Virginia
February 28, 2011
56
PEOPLES BANCORP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in thousands)
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash and due from banks
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks
Total cash and cash equivalents
Available-for-sale investment securities, at fair value (amortized cost of
$617,122 and $706,444 at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively)
Held-to-maturity investment securities, at amortized cost (fair value of
$2,954 and $963 at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively)
Other investment securities, at cost
Total investment securities
Loans, net of deferred fees and costs
Allowance for loan losses
Net loans
Loans held for sale
Bank premises and equipment, net
Bank owned life insurance
Goodwill
Other intangible assets
Other assets
Total assets
Liabilities
Deposits:
Non-interest-bearing
Interest-bearing
Total deposits
Short-term borrowings:
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
Total short-term borrowings
Long-term borrowings
Junior subordinated notes held by subsidiary trust
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
Total liabilities
Stockholders’ Equity
Preferred stock, no par value, 50,000 shares authorized, 39,000 shares
issued at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009
Common stock, no par value, 24,000,000 shares authorized,
11,070,022 shares issued and 11,031,892 shares issued at December 31, 2010
and 2009, respectively, including shares in treasury
Retained earnings
Accumulated comprehensive (loss) income, net of deferred income taxes
Treasury stock, at cost, 612,695 shares and 657,255 shares at December 31, 2010
and 2009, respectively
Total stockholders’ equity
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
57
December 31,
2010
2009
$
$
28,324
46,320
74,644
29,969
11,804
41,773
613,986
726,547
2,965
24,356
641,307
960,718
(26,766)
933,952
4,755
24,934
53,532
62,520
2,350
39,991
$ 1,837,985
963
24,356
751,866
1,052,058
(27,257)
1,024,801
1,874
24,844
52,924
62,520
3,079
38,146
$ 2,001,827
$
215,069
1,146,531
1,361,600
$
198,000
1,197,886
1,395,886
51,509
-
51,509
157,703
22,565
13,927
1,607,304
51,921
25,000
76,921
246,113
22,530
16,409
1,757,859
38,645
38,543
166,298
45,547
(4,453)
166,227
46,229
9,487
(15,356)
230,681
$ 1,837,985
(16,518)
243,968
$ 2,001,827
PEOPLES BANCORP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Interest Income:
Interest and fees on loans
Interest and dividends on taxable investment securities
Interest on tax-exempt investment securities
Other interest income
Total interest income
Interest Expense:
Interest on deposits
Interest on short-term borrowings
Interest on long-term borrowings
Interest on junior subordinated notes held by subsidiary trust
Total interest expense
Net interest income
Provision for loan losses
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
Gross impairment losses on investment securities
Less: Non-credit losses included in other comprehensive income
Net impairment losses on investment securities
Other Income:
Deposit account service charges
Insurance income
Trust and investment income
Electronic banking income
Mortgage banking income
Bank owned life insurance
Net gain on investment securities
Net (loss) gain on assets diposals and other transactions
Other non-interest income
Total other income
Other Expenses:
Salaries and employee benefit costs
Net occupancy and equipment
Professional fees
FDIC insurance
Electronic banking expense
Data processing and software
Foreclosed real estate and other loan expenses
Franchise taxes
Amortization of other intangible assets
Other non-interest expense
Total other expenses
Income before income taxes
Income tax expense (benefit)
Net income
Preferred dividends
Net income available to common shareholders
Earnings per common share - basic
Earnings per common share - diluted
Year Ended December 31,
2009
2010
2008
57,332
29,558
2,354
91
89,335
19,122
262
8,063
1,986
29,433
59,902
26,916
32,986
(1,620)
166
(1,786)
9,581
8,846
5,348
4,686
1,566
608
6,852
(6,891)
999
31,595
29,222
5,781
3,108
2,470
2,453
2,032
1,675
1,576
918
7,807
57,042
5,753
172
5,581
2,052
3,529
0.34
0.34
$
64,701
34,522
2,811
71
102,105
$
74,268
29,106
2,788
65
106,227
26,123
482
11,677
1,980
40,262
61,843
25,721
36,122
(7,406)
301
(7,707)
10,390
9,390
4,722
3,954
1,719
1,051
1,446
(103)
824
33,393
29,394
5,756
3,042
3,442
2,401
2,417
1,067
1,601
1,252
8,310
58,682
3,126
(1,064)
4,190
1,876
2,314
0.22
0.22
$
$
$
$
31,310
3,383
11,079
1,976
47,748
58,479
27,640
30,839
(4,260)
–
(4,260)
10,137
9,902
5,139
3,882
681
1,582
1,668
756
774
34,521
28,521
5,540
2,212
361
2,289
2,181
872
1,609
1,586
8,314
53,485
7,615
160
7,455
–
7,455
0.72
0.72
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding - basic
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding - diluted
10,424,474
10,431,990
10,363,975
10,374,792
10,315,263
10,348,579
See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
58
PEOPLES BANCORP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’
EQUITY
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Balance, December 31, 2007
Net income
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax
Cash dividends declared of $0.91 per share
Reissuance of treasury stock for common
stock option exercises
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options
Purchase of treasury stock
Common stock issued under dividend
reinvestment plan
$
Stock-based compensation expense
Balance, December 31, 2008
Net income
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
Issuance of preferred shares and common
stock warrant
Accrued dividends on preferred shares
Amortization of discount on preferred shares
Cash dividends declared of $0.66 per common share
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options
Purchase of treasury stock
Common shares issued under dividend
reinvestment plan
Stock-based compensation expense
Reissuance of treasury stock for deferred
compensation plan
Cumulative effect adjustment for non-credit
portion of previously recorded OTTI losses
Balance, December 31, 2009
Net income
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax
Reissuance of treasury stock for common
stock option exercises
Preferred
Stock
Common
Stock
Retained
Earnings
$
–
$
163,399
$
52,527
7,455
(9,470)
Accumulated
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Treasury
Stock
$
3,014
$
(16,104)
$
(15,302)
(113)
(32)
964
498
164,716
–
$
296
(506)
$
50,512
4,190
$
(12,288)
$
(16,314)
$
22,079
38,454
546
89
(1,787)
(89)
(6,901)
(14)
830
149
(249)
45
$
38,543
$
166,227
$
304
46,229
5,581
$
(304)
9,487
(13,940)
$
(16,518)
$
(1,950)
(102)
(4,211)
(428)
4
403
92
855
(181)
$
38,645
$
166,298
$
45,547
$
(4,453)
$
488
(15,356)
488
230,681
$
Accrued dividends on preferred shares
Amortization of discount on preferred stock
Cash dividends declared of $0.40 per common share
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options
Purchase of treasury stock
Common shares issued under dividend
102
reinvestment plan
Stock-based compensation expense
Reissuance of treasury stock for deferred
compensation plan
Balance, December 31, 2010
See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
59
Total
202,836
7,455
(15,302)
(9,470)
183
(32)
(506)
964
498
186,626
4,190
22,079
39,000
(1,787)
–
(6,901)
(14)
(249)
830
149
45
–
243,968
5,581
(13,940)
427
(1,950)
–
(4,211)
4
(181)
403
92
PEOPLES BANCORP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in thousands)
Operating activities
Net income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation, amortization, and accretion, net
Provision for loan losses
Bank owned life insurance income
Net (gain) loss on investment securities
Loans originated for sale
Proceeds from sales of loans
Net gains on sales of loans
Deferred income tax benefit
(Decrease) increase in accrued expenses
Increase (decrease) in interest receivable
Other, net
Net cash provided by operating activities
Investing activities
Available-for-sale securities:
Purchases of available-for-sale securities
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities
Proceeds from maturities, calls and prepayments of available-for-sale securities
Purchases of held-to-maturity securities
Net decrease (increase) in loans
Net expenditures for premises and equipment
Proceeds from sales of other real estate owned
Sale of banking offices and other assets
Investment in tax credit funds
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
Financing activities
Net increase in non-interest-bearing deposits
Net (decrease) increase in interest-bearing deposits
Net decrease in short-term borrowings
Proceeds from long-term borrowings
Payments on long-term borrowings
Issuance of preferred shares and common stock warrant
Cash dividends paid on preferred stock
Cash dividends paid on common shares
Purchase of treasury stock
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
Excess tax benefit (expense) for share based payments
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
Supplemental cash flow information:
Interest paid
Income taxes paid
See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
60
Year Ended December 31,
2009
2010
2008
$
5,581
$
4,190
$
7,455
15,797
26,916
(608)
(5,066)
(66,408)
65,212
(1,357)
(1,814)
(155)
1,193
5,826
45,117
(269,396)
150,844
202,671
(2,000)
61,069
(1,979)
499
–
(249)
141,459
17,069
(51,450)
(25,412)
5,000
(93,410)
–
(1,950)
(3,822)
(181)
447
4
(153,705)
32,871
41,773
74,644
30,109
385
$
$
4,088
25,721
(1,051)
6,261
(96,731)
96,399
(1,602)
(5,212)
155
(41)
(8,921)
23,256
(279,018)
90,239
174,808
(963)
24,670
(2,154)
512
–
(248)
7,846
17,960
11,455
(21,931)
5,000
(67,184)
39,000
(1,543)
(7,426)
(249)
5
(14)
(24,927)
6,175
35,598
41,773
41,015
1,262
$
$
5,749
27,640
(1,582)
2,592
(31,069)
32,546
(555)
(2,861)
(429)
1,055
(4,977)
35,564
(457,226)
156,767
137,292
–
(3,109)
(3,449)
273
775
(249)
(168,926)
4,983
174,900
(123,689)
140,000
(63,682)
–
–
(8,423)
(506)
210
(33)
123,760
(9,602)
45,200
35,598
48,138
4,395
$
$
PEOPLES BANCORP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Peoples Bancorp Inc. is a financial holding company that offers a full range of financial services and products,
including commercial and retail banking, insurance, brokerage and trust services, through its principal operating subsidiary,
Peoples Bank, National Association (“Peoples Bank”). Services are provided through 47 financial service locations and 40
automated teller machines in Ohio, West Virginia and Kentucky, as well as internet-based banking.
Note 1.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The accounting and reporting policies of Peoples Bancorp Inc. and Subsidiaries (“Peoples” refers to, Peoples Bancorp
Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries collectively, except where the context indicates the reference relates solely to Peoples
Bancorp Inc.) conform to generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“US GAAP”) and to
general practices within the banking industry. The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with US GAAP
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and
accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Certain items in prior financial statements have
been reclassified to conform to the current presentation, which had no impact on net income, comprehensive income or
loss, net cash provided by operating activities or stockholders’ equity.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed in the preparation of the financial statements:
Consolidation: Peoples’ Consolidated Financial Statements include subsidiaries in which Peoples has a controlling
financial interest, principally defined as owning a voting interest greater than 50%. In addition, entities not controlled
by voting interests or in which the equity investors do not bear the residual economic risks, but for which Peoples is the
primary beneficiary are also consolidated.
The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Peoples and its consolidated subsidiaries, Peoples
Bank and Peoples Investment Company, along with their wholly-owned subsidiaries. Peoples previously formed a
statutory business trust described in Note 10 that is a variable interest entity for which Peoples is not the primary
beneficiary. As a result, the accounts of this trust are not included in Peoples’ Consolidated Financial Statements. All
significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
Cash and Cash Equivalents: Cash and cash equivalents include cash and due from banks, interest-bearing deposits in
other banks, Federal Funds sold and other short-term investments, all with original maturities of ninety days or less.
Investment Securities: Investment securities are recorded initially at cost, which includes premiums and discounts if
purchased at other than par or face value. Peoples amortizes premiums and accretes discounts as an adjustment to
interest income on a level yield basis. The cost of investment securities sold, and any resulting gain or loss, is based on
the specific identification method and recognized as of the trade date.
Management determines the appropriate classification of investment securities at the time of purchase. Held-to-
maturity securities are those securities that Peoples has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity and are
recorded at amortized cost. Available-for-sale securities are those securities that would be available to be sold in the
future in response to Peoples’ liquidity needs, changes in market interest rates, and asset-liability management
strategies, among other considerations. Available-for-sale securities are reported at fair value, with unrealized holding
gains and losses reported in stockholders’ equity as a separate component of other comprehensive income or loss, net
of applicable deferred income taxes. Trading securities are those securities bought and held principally for the purpose
of selling in the near term. Trading securities are reported at fair value, with holding gains and losses recognized in
earnings.
Certain restricted equity securities that do not have readily determinable fair values and for which Peoples does not
exercise significant influence, are carried at cost. These cost method securities are reported as other investment
securities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and consist solely of shares of the Federal Home Loan Bank of
Cincinnati (“FHLB”) and the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.
Management systematically evaluates investment securities for other-than-temporary declines in fair value on a
quarterly basis. This analysis requires management to consider various factors, which include (1) duration and
magnitude of the decline in value, (2) the financial condition of the issuer or issuers and (3) structure of the security.
An impairment loss is recognized in earnings only when (1) Peoples intends to sell the debt security; (2) it is more
likely than not that Peoples will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis or (3)
61
Peoples does not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security. In situations where Peoples intends
to sell or when it is more likely than not that Peoples will be required to sell the security, the entire impairment loss
must be recognized in earnings. In all other situations, only the portion of the impairment loss representing the credit
loss must be recognized in earnings, with the remaining portion being recognized in stockholders’ equity as a
component of accumulated comprehensive income, net of deferred taxes.
Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase: Peoples enters into sales of securities under agreements to
repurchase (“Repurchase Agreements”) with customers and other financial service companies, which are treated as
financings. The obligations to repurchase securities sold are recorded as a liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheets
and disclosed in Notes 8 and 9. Securities pledged as collateral under Repurchase Agreements are included in
investment securities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and are disclosed in Note 3. The fair value of the collateral
pledged to a third party is continually monitored and additional collateral is pledged or returned, as deemed
appropriate.
Loans: Loans originated that Peoples has the positive intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or to maturity
or payoff are reported at the principal balance outstanding, net of deferred loan fees and costs and an allowance for
loan losses. The foreseeable future is based upon current market conditions and business strategies, as well as balance
sheet management and liquidity. As the conditions change, so may management’s view of the foreseeable future. Net
deferred loan costs were $1.0 million and $1.1 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
A loan is considered impaired, based on current information and events, if it is probable that collection of principal
and interest payments when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement is doubtful. Impairment is
evaluated in total for smaller-balance loans of a similar nature, primarily consumer and residential real estate loans, and
on an individual loan basis for all loans to borrowers with an aggregate unpaid principal balances in excess of
$500,000. Peoples places any loan deemed to be impaired on nonaccrual status and allocates a specific portion of the
allowance for loan losses, if necessary, to reduce the net reported value of the loan to its estimated net realizable value.
Interest payments on impaired loans are typically applied to principal unless collectibility of the principal amount is
reasonably assured, in which case interest is recognized on a cash basis. Impaired loans, or portions thereof, are
charged off when deemed uncollectible. Consumer and residential real estate loans typically are not placed on
nonaccrual, and instead are charged down to the net realizable value.
Loans acquired in a business combination that have evidence of deterioration of credit quality since origination
and for which it is probable, at acquisition, that Peoples will be unable to collect all contractually required payments
receivable are initially recorded at fair value (the present value of the amounts expected to be collected) with no
valuation allowance. The difference between the undiscounted cash flows expected at acquisition and the investment
in the loan, or the “accretable yield”, is recognized as interest income on a level-yield method over the life of the loan.
Contractually required payments for interest and principal that exceed the undiscounted cash flows expected at
acquisition, or the “nonaccretable difference”, are not recognized as a yield adjustment or as a loss accrual or a
valuation allowance.
Over the life of these acquired loans, management continues to monitor each acquired loan portfolio for changes in
credit quality. Increases in expected cash flows subsequent to acquisition are recognized prospectively over their
remaining life as a yield adjustment on the loans. Subsequent decreases in expected cash flows are recognized as
impairment, with the amount of the expected loss included in management’s evaluation of the adequacy of the
allowance for loan losses.
Loans Held-for-Sale: Loans originated and intended to be sold in the secondary market, generally one-to-four family
residential loans, are carried at the lower of cost or estimated fair value determined on an aggregate basis. Gains and
losses on sales of loans held for sale are included in mortgage banking income.
Loans originated with the intent to be held in our portfolio are subsequently transferred to held-for-sale when a
decision is made to sell these loans. At the time of a loan’s transfer to the held-for-sale classification, the loan is
recorded at the lower of cost or its fair value. Any reduction in the loan’s value is reflected as a write-down of the
recorded investment resulting in a new cost basis, with a corresponding charge against the allowance for loan losses. If
the fair value of a loan classified as held-for-sale in subsequent periods is less than its cost basis, the carrying value of
the loan is adjusted accordingly, with the corresponding loss recognized in earnings as a component of other gains and
losses.
Peoples enters into interest rate lock commitments with borrowers and best efforts commitments with investors on
loans originated for sale into the secondary markets. Peoples uses these commitments to manage the inherent interest
rate and pricing risk associated with selling loans in the secondary market. The interest rate lock commitments
generally terminate once the loan is funded, the lock period expires or the borrower decides not to contract for the loan.
62
The best efforts commitments generally terminate once the loan is sold, the commitment period expires or the borrower
decides not to contract for the loan. These commitments are considered derivatives which are generally accounted for
by recognizing their estimated fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as either a freestanding asset or liability.
The valuation of such commitments does not consider expected cash flows related to the servicing of the future loan.
Management has determined these derivatives do not have a material effect on Peoples’ financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
Allowance for Loan Losses: The allowance for loan losses is a valuation reserve allowance established through
provisions for loan losses charged against income. The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level that
management deems sufficient to absorb probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Loans deemed to be
uncollectible are charged against the allowance for loan losses, while recoveries of previously charged-off amounts are
credited to the allowance for loan losses.
The allowance for loan losses is comprised of specific valuation allowances for loans evaluated individually for
impairment and general allocations for pools of homogeneous loans with similar risk characteristics and trends.
Peoples’ homogenous loan pools include similarly risk-graded commercial and industrial loans, similarly risk-graded
commercial real estate loans, real estate construction loans (both commercial and residential), residential real estate
loans, consumer home equity loans and other consumers. Management’s evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance
for loan losses and the appropriate provision for loan losses is based upon a quarterly analysis of the portfolio. While
portions of the allowance for loan losses may be allocated to specific loans; the entire allowance for loan losses is
available for any loan management should be charged off.
The allowance for loan losses related to specific loans is based on management’s estimate of potential losses on
impaired loans as determined by (1) the present value of expected future cash flows; (2) the fair value of collateral if
the loan is determined to be collateral dependent or (3) the loan’s observable market price. The general allocations to
specific loan pools are based on the historical loss rates for specific loan types and the internal risk grade, if applicable,
adjusted for both internal and external qualitative risk factors. The calculation of historical loss ratios for pools of
similar loans with similar characteristics is based upon the proportion of actual charge-offs experienced to the total
population of loans in the pool. The historical loss ratios are periodically updated based on actual charge-off
experience. The qualitative factors considered by management include, among other factors, (1) changes in local and
national economic conditions; (2) changes in asset quality; (3) changes in loan portfolio volume; (4) the composition
and concentrations of credit; (5) the impact of competition on loan structuring and pricing; (6) the impact of interest
rate changes on portfolio risk and (7) effectiveness of Peoples’ loan policies, procedures and internal controls. The
total allowance established for each homogenous loan pool represents the product of the historical loss ratio and the
total dollar amount of the loans in the pool.
Peoples categorizes loans involving commercial borrowers into risk categories based upon an established grading
matrix. This system is used to manage the risk within its lending activities, evaluate changes in the overall credit
quality of the loan portfolio and evaluate of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. Loan grades are assigned at
the time a new loan or lending commitment is extended by Peoples and may be changed at any time when
circumstances warrant. All loan relationships with aggregate outstanding debt to Peoples of $500,000 or more are
reviewed at least annually, with adversely classified loans generally reviewed on a quarterly basis.
The primary factors considered when assigning a risk grade to a loan include (1) reliability and sustainability of
the primary source of repayment; (2) past, present and projected financial condition of the borrower and (3) current
economic and industry conditions. Other factors that could influence the risk grade assigned include the type and
quality of collateral, ownership of borrower and strength of guarantors. The primary source of repayment for
commercial real estate loans and commercial and industrial loans is normally the business’s operating cash flow
available to repay debt. Management’s analysis of operating cash flow for commercial real estate loans secured by
non-owner occupied properties takes into account factors such as rent rolls and vacancy statistics. Management’s
analysis of operating cash flow for commercial real estate loans secured by owner occupied properties and all
commercial and industrial loans considers the profitability, liquidity and leverage of the business. The evaluation of
construction loans is based largely on the borrower’s ability to complete construction within the established budget.
The primary factors considered when classifying consumer loans include the loan’s past due status and declaration
of bankruptcy by the borrower(s). The classification of residential real estate and home equity lines of credit also takes
into account the current value of the underlying collateral.
Bank Premises and Equipment: Bank premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation.
Depreciation is computed on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets owned.
Major improvements to leased facilities are capitalized and included in bank premises at cost less accumulated
63
depreciation, which is calculated on the straight-line method over the lesser of the remaining term of the leased facility
or the estimated economic life of the improvement.
Bank Owned Life Insurance: Bank owned life insurance (“BOLI”) represents life insurance on the lives of certain
employees who have provided positive consent allowing Peoples Bank to be the beneficiary of such policies. These
policies are recorded at their cash surrender value, or the amount that can be realized upon surrender of the policy.
Income from these policies and changes in the cash surrender value are recorded in other income.
Investments in Affordable Housing Limited Partnerships: Investments in affordable housing consist of investments in
limited partnerships that operate qualified affordable housing projects or that invest in other limited partnerships
formed to operate affordable housing projects. These investments are considered variable interest entities for which
Peoples is not the primary beneficiary. Peoples generally utilizes the effective yield method to account for these
investments with the tax credits, net of the amortization of the investment, reflected in the Consolidated Statements of
Income as a reduction of income tax expense. The unamortized amount of the investments is recorded in other assets.
Peoples’ investments in affordable housing limited partnerships were $2.4 million and $3.8 million at December 31,
2010 and 2009, respectively.
Other Real Estate Owned: Other real estate owned (“OREO”), included in other assets on the Consolidated Balance
Sheets, is comprised primarily of commercial and residential real estate properties acquired by Peoples Bank in
satisfaction of a loan. OREO obtained in satisfaction of a loan is recorded at the lower of cost or estimated fair value
based on appraised value at the date actually or constructively received, less estimated costs to sell the property.
Peoples had OREO totaling $4.5 million at December 31, 2010, and $6.3 million at December 31, 2009.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets: Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquisition over the fair value
of the net assets acquired in the business combination. Goodwill is not amortized but is tested for impairment at least
annually and updated quarterly if necessary. Based upon the most recently completed goodwill impairment test,
Peoples concluded the recorded value of goodwill was not impaired as of December 31, 2010, based upon the
estimated fair value of Peoples’ single reporting unit.
Peoples’ other intangible assets consist of customer relationship intangible assets, primarily core deposit
intangibles, representing the present value of future net income to be earned from acquired customer relationships with
definite useful lives. These intangible assets are amortized on an accelerated basis over their estimated lives ranging
from 7 to 10 years.
Mortgage Servicing Rights: Mortgage servicing rights (“MSRs”) represent the right to service loans sold to third party
investors. MSRs are recognized separately as a servicing asset or liability whenever Peoples undertakes an obligation
to service financial assets.
Peoples initially records MSRs at fair value at the time of the sale of the loans to the third party investor. Peoples
follows the amortization method for the subsequent measurement of each class of separately recognized servicing
assets and liabilities. Under the amortization method, Peoples amortizes the value of servicing assets or liabilities in
proportion to and over the period of estimated net servicing income or net servicing loss and assesses servicing assets
or liabilities for impairment or increased obligation based on fair value at each reporting date. The fair value of the
mortgage servicing rights is determined by using a discounted cash flow model, which estimates the present value of
the future net cash flows of the servicing portfolio based on various factors, such as servicing costs, expected
prepayment speeds and discount rates.
MSRs are reported in other intangible assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Serviced loans are not included
in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Loan servicing income included in mortgage banking income includes servicing
fees received from the third party investors and certain charges collected from the borrowers.
Preferred Stock and Common Stock Warrant: As more fully described in Note 11, Peoples issued preferred stock and
a common stock warrant, which are classified in stockholders’ equity on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The
outstanding preferred stock has similar characteristics of an “Increasing Rate Security” as described by Securities and
Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 5Q, Increasing Rate Preferred Stock. The proceeds
received in conjunction with the issuance of the preferred stock and common stock warrant were allocated to the
preferred stock and common stock warrant based on their relative fair values. Discounts on the increasing rate
preferred stock are amortized over the expected life of the preferred stock (5 years), by charging imputed dividend cost
against retained earnings and increasing the carrying amount of the preferred stock by a corresponding amount. The
discount at the time of issuance is computed as the present value of the difference between dividends that will be
payable in future periods and the dividend amount for a corresponding number of periods, discounted at a market rate
for dividend yield on comparable securities. The amortization in each period is the amount which, together with the
64
stated dividend in the period, results in a constant rate of effective cost with regard to the carrying amount of the
preferred stock.
Common stock warrants are evaluated for liability or equity treatment. The common stock warrant outstanding is
carried in stockholders’ equity until exercised or expired based on the view of both the SEC and Financial Accounting
Standards Board (the “FASB”) that they would not object to classification of such warrants as permanent equity. This
view is consistent with the objective of the Capital Purchase Program that equity in these securities should be
considered part of equity for regulatory reporting purposes. The fair value of the common stock warrant used in
allocating total proceeds received was determined based on a binomial model.
Trust Assets Under Management: Peoples Bank manages certain assets held in a fiduciary or agency capacity for
customers. These assets under management, other than cash on deposit at Peoples Bank, are not included in the
Consolidated Balance Sheets since they are not assets of Peoples Bank.
Interest Income Recognition: Interest income on loans and investment securities is recognized by methods that result
in level rates of return on principal amounts outstanding. Amortization of premiums has been deducted from, and
accretion of discounts has been added to, the related interest income. Nonrefundable loan fees and direct loan costs are
deferred and recognized over the life of the loan as an adjustment of the yield.
Peoples discontinues the accrual of interest on all loans, whether or not such loans are considered past due, when
management believes it is probable the borrower will be unable to meet its payment obligations as they become due, as
well as when required by regulatory provisions. When interest accrual is discontinued, all unpaid accrued interest is
reversed. Interest received on nonaccrual loans is included in income only if principal recovery is reasonably assured.
A nonaccrual loan is restored to accrual status when it is brought current, has performed in accordance with contractual
terms for a reasonable period of time, and the collectibility of the total contractual principal and interest is no longer in
doubt.
Other Income Recognition: Service charges on deposits include cost recovery fees associated with services provided,
such as overdraft and non-sufficient funds. Trust and investment income consists of revenue from fiduciary activities,
which include fees for services such as asset management, recordkeeping, retirement services and estate management,
and investment commissions and fees related to the sale of investments. Income from these activities is recognized at
the time the related services are performed.
Insurance income consists of commissions and fees from the sales of insurance policies and related insurance
services. Insurance commission income is recognized as of the effective date of the insurance policy, net of
adjustments, including policy cancellations. Such adjustments are recorded when the amount can be reasonably
estimated, which is generally in the period in which they occur. Contingent performance-based commissions from
insurance companies are recognized when received and no contingencies remain.
Income Taxes: Peoples and its subsidiaries file a consolidated federal income tax return. Deferred income tax assets
and liabilities are provided for temporary differences between the tax basis of an asset or liability and its reported
amount in the Consolidated Financial Statements at the statutory Federal tax rate. A valuation allowance, if needed,
reduces deferred tax assets to the expected amount most likely to be realized. Realization of deferred tax assets is
dependent upon the generation of a sufficient level of future taxable income and recoverable taxes paid in prior years.
The components of other comprehensive income or loss included in the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’
Equity have been computed based upon a 35% Federal tax rate.
A tax position is initially recognized in the financial statements when it is more likely than not the position will be
sustained upon examination by the tax authorities. Such tax positions are initially and subsequently measured as the
largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the tax
authority assuming full knowledge of the position and all relevant facts. Penalties and interest incurred under the
applicable tax law are classified as income tax expense. The amount of Peoples’ uncertain income tax positions,
unrecognized benefits and accrued interest were immaterial at both December 31, 2010 and 2009.
Advertising Costs: Advertising costs are generally expensed as incurred.
Earnings per Share: Basic earnings per common share are computed by dividing net income available to common
shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per common share is
computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common
shares outstanding adjusted to include the effect of potentially dilutive common shares. Potentially dilutive common
shares include incremental shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock options, stock appreciation rights and
non-vested restricted common shares using the treasury stock method.
65
Operating Segments: Peoples’ business activities are currently confined to one reporting unit and reportable segment,
which is community banking. As a community banking entity, Peoples offers its customers a full range of products
through various delivery channels.
Stock-Based Compensation: Compensation costs for stock options, restricted stock awards and stock appreciation
rights are measured at the fair value of these awards on their grant date. The fair value of stock options and stock
appreciation rights is estimated based upon a Black-Scholes model, while the market price of Peoples’ common shares
at the grant date is used to estimate the fair value of restricted stock awards. Compensation expense is recognized over
the required service period, generally the vesting period for stock options and stock appreciation rights and the
restriction period for restricted stock awards. Compensation expense for awards granted to employees who are eligible
for retirement is recognized to the date the employee is first eligible to retire.
New Accounting Pronouncements: From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by FASB or other
standard setting bodies that are adopted by Peoples as of the required effective dates. Unless otherwise discussed,
management believes the impact of any recently issued standards, including those issued but not yet effective, will not
have a material impact on Peoples financial statements taken as a whole.
In July 2010, the FASB issued an accounting pronouncement requiring entities to provide additional disclosures in
their financial statements regarding the credit quality of financing receivables and the allowance for credit losses. The
new disclosures are designed to facilitate financial statement users' evaluation of (1) the nature of credit risk inherent in
the entity's portfolio of financing receivables, (2) how that risk is analyzed and assessed in arriving at the allowance for
credit losses and (3) the changes and reasons for those changes in the allowance for credit losses. Disclosures must be
disaggregated by portfolio segment, which is the level at which an entity develops and documents a systematic method
for determining its allowance for credit losses, and class of financing receivable, which is generally a disaggregation of
portfolio segment. The required disclosures include, among other things, a rollforward of the allowance for credit
losses as well as information about modified, impaired, non-accrual and past due loans and credit quality indicators.
The new disclosures required as of the end of a reporting period became effective for Peoples’ financial statements as
of December 31, 2010, and can be found in Note 4. The new disclosures that relate to activity during a reporting
period will be effective beginning with Peoples’ financial statements for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011.
Note 2.
Fair Values of Financial Instruments
The measurement of fair value under US GAAP uses a hierarchy intended to maximize the use of observable inputs
and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. This hierarchy uses three levels of inputs to measure the fair value of assets
and liabilities as follows:
Level 1: Quoted prices in active exchange markets for identical assets or liabilities; also includes certain U.S.
Treasury and other U.S. government and agency securities actively traded in over-the-counter markets.
Level 2: Observable inputs other than Level 1 including quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices
in less active markets, or other observable inputs that can be corroborated by observable market data; also includes
derivative contracts whose value is determined using a pricing model with observable market inputs or can be
derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data. This category generally includes certain U.S.
government and agency securities, corporate debt securities, derivative instruments, and residential mortgage loans
held for sale.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs supported by little or no market activity for financial instruments whose value is
determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as
instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation;
also includes observable inputs for single dealer nonbinding quotes not corroborated by observable market data.
This category generally includes certain private equity investments, retained interests from securitizations, and
certain collateralized debt obligations.
66
Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis comprised the following at December 31:
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Fair Value
$
$
$
$
39
12,262
47,379
507,534
30,700
–
12,984
–
3,088
613,986
81
4,473
62,954
558,826
24,188
59,440
13,826
165
2,594
726,547
$
$
$
$
–
–
–
18,179
3,545
–
–
–
2,960
24,684
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
2,420
2,420
$
$
$
$
39
12,262
47,379
489,355
27,155
–
12,984
–
128
589,302
81
4,473
62,954
558,826
24,188
59,440
12,826
–
174
722,962
$
$
$
$
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
1,000
165
–
1,165
(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2010
Obligations of:
U.S. Treasury and government agencies
U.S. government sponsored agencies
States and political subdivisions
Residential mortgage-backed securities
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
U.S. government-backed student loan pools
Bank-issued trust preferred securities
Collateralized debt obligations
Equity securities
Total available-for-sale securities
December 31, 2009
Obligations of:
U.S. Treasury and government agencies
U.S. government sponsored agencies
States and political subdivisions
Residential mortgage-backed securities
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
U.S. government-backed student loan pools
Bank-issued trust preferred securities
Collateralized debt obligations
Equity securities
Total available-for-sale securities
The fair values used by Peoples are obtained from an independent pricing service and represent either quoted market
prices for the identical securities (Level 1 inputs) or fair values determined by pricing models that consider observable
market data, such as interest rate volatilities, LIBOR yield curve, credit spreads and prices from market makers and live
trading systems. The investment securities measured at fair value using Level 3 inputs at December 31, 2009, were
comprised of four collateralized debt obligations, for which there was not an active market. Peoples used multiple input
factors to determine the fair value of these securities. Those input factors included discounted cash flow analysis, structure
of the security in relation to current level of deferrals and/or defaults, changes in credit ratings, financial condition of the
debtors within the underlying securities, broker quotes for securities with similar structure and credit risk, interest rate
movements and pricing of new issuances.
67
The following is a reconciliation of activity for assets measured at fair value based on significant unobservable (non-
market) information:
(Dollars in thousands)
Balance, December 31, 2008
Other-than-temporary impairment loss
included in earnings
Unrealized loss included in comprehensive income
Cumulative effect adjustment for non-credit
portion of previously recorded OTTI losses
Balance, December 31, 2009
Other-than-temporary impairment loss
included in earnings
Calls
Unrealized gain included in comprehensive income
Balance, December 31, 2010
Bank-issued
Trust
Preferred
Securities
$
$
$
1,000
–
–
–
1,000
–
(1,000)
–
–
Collateralized
Debt Obligations
4,422
(3,706)
$
(1,018)
467
165
–
(986)
–
821
–
$
$
Certain financial assets and financial liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis; that is, the
instruments are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments in certain
circumstances (for example, when there is evidence of impairment). Financial assets measured at fair value on a non-
recurring basis included the following:
Impaired Loans: Impaired loans are measured and reported at fair value when management believes collection of
contractual interest and principal payments is doubtful. Management’s determination of the fair value for these
loans represents the estimated net proceeds to be received from the sale of the collateral based on observable
market prices and market value provided by independent, licensed or certified appraisers (Level 2 Inputs). At
December 31, 2010, impaired loans with an aggregate outstanding principal balance of $22.7 million were
measured and reported at a fair value of $19.6 million. During 2010, Peoples recognized losses of $6.4 million on
these impaired loans through the allowance for loan losses.
Loans Held-For-Sale: Loans held-for-sale are measured and reported at fair value when the aggregate out-
standing principal balance of the loan pool exceeds the estimated fair value of the loan pool. Management’s de-
termination of the fair value uses a market approach representing the amounts a third party financial investor
would be willing to pay for the loans (Level 1 Inputs). At December 31, 2010, Peoples had $8.0 million of com-
mercial real estate loans classified as held-for-sale (of which all loans were on nonaccrual status) which were
measured and reported at a fair value of $1.0 million. Peoples recognized losses of $1,319,000 for the year ended
December 31, 2010.
Other Real Estate Owned: Other real estate owned (“OREO”) is measured and reported at fair value when the
current book value exceeds the estimated fair value of the property. Management’s determination of the fair value
for these loans uses a market approach representing the estimated net proceeds to be received from the sale of the
property based on observable market prices and market value provided by independent, licensed or certified ap-
praisers (Level 2 Inputs). At December 31, 2010, Peoples had $6.0 million of OREO which was measured and re-
ported at a fair value of $4.1 million. During 2010, Peoples recorded losses of $205,000 and $1.9 million for the
three months and year ended December 31, 2010, respectively.
68
The following table presents the fair values of financial assets and liabilities carried on Peoples’ consolidated balance
sheet, including those financial assets and financial liabilities that are not measured and reported at fair value on a recurring
basis or non-recurring basis:
(Dollars in thousands)
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
Investment securities
Loans
Financial liabilities:
Deposits
Short-term borrowings
Long-term borrowings
Junior subordinated notes held by
subsidiary trust
2010
2009
Carrying
Amount
Fair
Value
Carrying
Amount
Fair
Value
$
74,644
641,307
938,707
$
74,644
641,296
825,547
$
41,773
751,866
1,026,675
$
41,773
751,866
892,182
$ 1,361,600
51,509
157,703
$ 1,380,336
51,509
164,075
$ 1,395,886
76,921
246,113
$ 1,406,371
76,921
253,943
22,565
23,861
22,530
25,968
The methodologies for estimating the fair value of financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a
recurring or non-recurring basis are discussed above. For certain financial assets and liabilities, carrying value
approximates fair value due to the nature of the financial instrument. These instruments include cash and cash equivalents,
demand and other non-maturity deposits and overnight borrowings. Peoples used the following methods and assumptions
in estimating the fair value of the following financial instruments:
Loans: The fair value of portfolio loans assumes sale of the notes to a third party financial investor. Accordingly,
the value to Peoples if the notes were held to maturity is not included in the fair value estimate. Peoples considered
interest rate, credit and market factors in estimating the fair value of loans. In the current whole loan market,
financial investors are generally requiring a much higher rate of return than the return inherent in loans if held to
maturity given the lack of market liquidity. This divergence accounts for the majority of the difference in carrying
amount over fair value.
Deposits: The fair value of fixed maturity certificates of deposit is estimated using a discounted cash flow
calculation based on current rates offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.
Long-term Borrowings: The fair value of long-term borrowings is estimated using discounted cash flow analysis
based on rates currently available to Peoples for borrowings with similar terms.
Junior Subordinated Notes Held by Subsidiary Trust: The fair value of the junior subordinated notes held by
subsidiary trust is estimated using discounted cash flow analysis based on current market rates of securities with
similar risk and remaining maturity.
Bank premises and equipment, customer relationships, deposit base, banking center networks, and other information
required to compute Peoples’ aggregate fair value are not included in the above information. Accordingly, the above fair
values are not intended to represent the aggregate fair value of Peoples.
69
Note 3.
Investment Securities
Available-for-sale
The following table summarizes Peoples’ available-for-sale securities at December 31:
(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2010
Obligations of:
U.S. Treasury and government agencies
U.S. government sponsored agencies
States and political subdivisions
Residential mortgage-backed securities
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
Bank-issued trust preferred securities
Equity securities
Total available-for-sale securities
December 31, 2009
Obligations of:
U.S. Treasury and government agencies
U.S. government sponsored agencies
States and political subdivisions
Residential mortgage-backed securities
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
U.S. government-backed student loan pools
Bank-issued trust preferred securities
Collateralized debt obligations
Equity securities
Total available-for-sale securities
$
Amortized
Cost
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
Non-Credit
Losses included
in Other
Gross
Unrealized Comprehensive
Losses
Income
Fair
Value
$
$
$
38
12,753
46,717
512,398
30,124
13,877
1,214
617,121
81
4,384
60,943
546,131
23,656
52,972
16,073
986
1,218
706,444
$
$
$
$
1
55
1,063
14,155
648
79
1,970
17,971
1
89
2,064
17,576
675
6,547
47
–
1,426
28,425
$
$
$
$
–
(546)
(401)
(19,019)
(72)
(972)
(96)
(21,106)
–
–
(54)
(4,882)
(143)
(77)
(2,294)
(655)
(51)
(8,156)
$
$
$
$
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
(166)
–
(166)
$
$
$
$
39
12,262
47,379
507,534
30,700
12,984
3,088
613,986
82
4,473
62,953
558,825
24,188
59,442
13,826
165
2,593
726,547
At December 31, 2010, there were no securities of a single issuer, other than U.S. Treasury and government agencies
and U.S. government sponsored agencies, that exceeded 10% of stockholders' equity. At December 31, 2010 and 2009,
investment securities having a carrying value of $394.7 million and $492.8 million, respectively, were pledged to secure
public and trust department deposits and repurchase agreements in accordance with federal and state requirements. Peoples
also had investment securities pledged with carrying values of $ 28.1 million and $121.3 million at December 31, 2010 and
2009, respectively, to secure additional borrowing capacity at the FHLB and Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.
The gross gains and gross losses realized by Peoples from sales of available-for-sale securities for the years ended
December 31 were as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
Gross gains realized
Gross losses realized
Net gain realized
2010
$
$
8,306
1,454
6,852
2009
$
$
1,460
14
1,446
2008
2,740
1,072
1,668
$
$
70
The following table presents a summary of available-for-sale investment securities that had an unrealized loss at
Less than 12 Months
Unrealized
Loss
No. of
Securities
Fair
Value
12 Months or More
Unrealized
Loss
No. of
Securities
Fair
Value
Total
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Loss
December 31:
(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2010
Obligations of:
U.S. Treasury and government agencies
U.S. government sponsored agencies
States and political subdivisions
Residential mortgage-backed securities
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
U.S. government-backed student loan pools
Bank-issued trust preferred securities
Collateralized debt obligations
Equity securities
$
– $
11,202
13,055
152,075
21,388
–
4,290
–
–
Total available-for-sale securities
$ 202,010 $
$
December 31, 2009
Obligations of:
U.S. Treasury and government agencies
U.S. government sponsored agencies
States and political subdivisions
Residential mortgage-backed securities
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
U.S. government-backed student loan pools
Bank-issued trust preferred securities
Collateralized debt obligations
Equity securities
Total available-for-sale securities
$
– $
–
3,284
37,720
1,966
–
–
–
–
42,970 $
–
(546)
(401)
(13,080)
(72)
–
(47)
–
–
(14,146)
–
–
54
2,400
143
–
–
–
–
2,597
–
1
19
23
4
–
3
–
–
50
–
–
6
7
1
–
–
–
–
14
$
$
$
$
– $
–
–
39,540
–
–
5,144
–
80
44,764 $
– $
–
–
60,120
–
2,923
11,574
165
125
74,907
$
–
–
–
(5,939)
–
–
(925)
–
(96)
(6,960)
–
–
–
2,482
–
77
2,294
655
51
5,559
–
–
–
9
–
–
5
–
1
15
–
–
–
19
–
1
10
2
1
33
$
– $
11,202
13,055
191,615
21,388
–
9,434
–
80
246,774 $
– $
–
3,284
97,840
1,966
2,923
11,574
165
125
117,877 $
$
$
$
–
(546)
(401)
(19,019)
(72)
–
(972)
–
(96)
(21,106)
–
–
54
4,882
143
77
2,294
655
51
8,156
Management systematically evaluates investment securities for other-than-temporary declines in fair value on a
quarterly basis. During 2010, Peoples recognized a non-cash pre-tax other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) loss of
$1.0 million on its remaining investment in collateralized debt obligation (“CDO”) securities. These securities were equity
tranche CDO securities comprised mostly of bank-issued trust preferred securities. The OTTI loss reflects management’s
estimation of credit losses incurred during the first quarter of 2010 based upon actual defaults, its evaluation of the credit
quality of the issuers and corresponding analysis of cash flows to be received from the securities. After recognition of the
2010 OTTI loss, Peoples no longer has any exposure to CDO securities within its investment portfolio. Management
performed its analysis of the remaining securities with an unrealized loss at December 31, 2010, and concluded no other
individual securities were other-than-temporarily impaired.
At December 31, 2010, the residential mortgage-backed securities that have been at an unrealized loss position for less
than twelve months consisted almost entirely of securities purchased since September 2009. The interest rate profiles of
these securities are such that changes in fair value of the securities are directionally consistent with changes in market
interest rates. All of the securities that have been at an unrealized loss position for twelve months or more were purchased
prior to year-end 2008. None of these securities were downgraded by either Moody’s or S&P during 2010, and, with the
exception of a single holding, all of these investments experienced improvement in value during 2010. In addition, the fair
value for nearly all of these securities was within 90% of its December 31 book value. The positions with a fair value less
than 90% of their book value were limited to three bank-issued trust preferred securities, which had an aggregate book
value of $3.0 million and fair value of $2.2 million, and two residential mortgage-backed securities with an aggregate book
value of $22.9 million and fair value of $17.6 million. Management has analyzed the underlying credit quality of these
issuers, all of whom were part of the Supervisory Capital Assessment Program conducted by federal banking regulators in
the first half of 2009, and concluded the unrealized losses were entirely attributable to the floating rate nature of these
investments and current market interest rates.
The following table presents the amortized costs, fair value and weighted-average yield of securities by contractual
maturity at December 31, 2010. The average yields are based on the amortized cost. In some cases, the issuers may have
the right to call or prepay obligations without call or prepayment penalties prior to the contractual maturity date. Rates are
calculated on a fully tax-equivalent basis using a 35% Federal income tax rate.
71
(Dollars in thousands)
Amortized cost
Obligations of:
U.S. Treasury and government agencies
U.S. government sponsored agencies
States and political subdivisions
Residential mortgage-backed securities
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
Bank-issued trust preferred securities
Equity securities
Total available-for-sale securities
Fair value
Obligations of:
U.S. Treasury and government agencies
U.S. government sponsored agencies
States and political subdivisions
Residential mortgage-backed securities
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
Bank-issued trust preferred securities
Equity securities
Total available-for-sale securities
Total average yield
Within 1
Year
1 to 5
Years
5 to 10 Years
Over 10
Years
Total
$
$
$
$
–
–
1,730
–
–
–
–
1,730
–
–
1,760
–
–
–
–
1,760
5.92%
$
$
$
$
14
1,005
12,884
2,872
–
–
–
16,775
14
1,060
13,369
3,020
–
–
–
17,463
5.94%
$
$
$
$
24
11,748
10,474
106,524
7,797
–
–
136,567
$
–
–
21,629
403,002
22,327
13,877
1,214
$ 462,049
25
11,202
10,838
107,496
8,155
–
–
137,716
4.34%
$
–
–
21,412
397,018
22,545
12,984
3,088
$ 457,047
3.92%
$
$
$
$
38
12,753
46,717
512,398
30,124
13,877
1,214
617,121
39
12,262
47,379
507,534
30,700
12,984
3,088
613,986
4.08%
Held-to-Maturity
At December 31, 2010, Peoples’ held-to-maturity investments consisted of two qualified school construction bonds
that are classified as held-to-maturity because of Peoples’ intent and ability to hold the securities to maturity given
uncertainty regarding ownership rights of the associated tax credits. These securities are carried at an aggregate amortized
cost of $3.0 million and have gross unrealized losses totaling $11,000; weighted average cash coupon and tax credit rates of
1.83% and 6.09%, respectively, and a remaining contractual maturity exceeding10 years.
Note 4. Loans
Peoples Bank originates various types of loans including commercial loans, real estate loans and consumer loans,
focusing primarily on lending opportunities in central and southeastern Ohio, west central West Virginia, and northeastern
Kentucky markets. The major classifications of loan balances, excluding loans held for sale, at December 31 were as
follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial real estate
Commercial and industrial
Real estate construction
Residential real estate
Home equity lines of credit
Consumer
Deposit account overdrafts
Total loans
2010
452,875
153,192
22,478
200,275
48,130
81,567
2,201
960,718
$
$
2009
503,034
159,915
32,427
215,735
49,183
90,144
1,620
1,052,058
$
$
72
Peoples has acquired various loans through business combinations for which there was, at acquisition, evidence of
deterioration of credit quality since origination and for which it was probable that all contractually required payments
would not be collected. The carrying amounts of these loans at December 31 included in the loan balances above are
summarized as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial real estate
Commercial and industrial
Residential real estate
Consumer
Total outstanding balance
Net carrying amount
2010
2009
3,616
200
17,893
123
21,832
21,229
$
$
$
4,112
896
20,242
186
25,436
24,734
$
$
$
Peoples Bank has pledged certain loans secured by 1-4 family and multifamily residential mortgages under a blanket
collateral agreement to secure borrowings from the FHLB as discussed in Note 8. At December 31, 2010, the amount of
such pledged loans totaled $181.8 million. At December 2010, Peoples pledged commercial loans with outstanding
balances totaling approximately $196 million to secure borrowings with the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.
Nonaccrual and Past Due Loans
A loan is considered past due if any required principal and interest payments have not been received as of the date such
payments were required to be made under the terms of the loan agreement. A loan may be placed on nonaccrual status
regardless of whether or not such loan is considered past due. The recorded investment in loans on nonaccrual status and
accruing loans delinquent for 90 days or more were as follows at December 31:
(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial real estate
Commercial and industrial
Residential real estate
Home equity lines of credit
Consumer
Total
Nonaccrual Loans
2010
2009
$ 25,852
$ 34,392
2,884
1,714
4,687
3,790
546
554
–
3
$ 33,972
$ 40,450
Accruing Loans
90+ Days Past Due
2010
2009
$
$
–
–
27
–
–
27
$
$
164
–
238
–
9
411
The following table presents the aging of the recorded investment in past due loans and leases as of December 31,
2010:
(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial real estate
Commercial and industrial
Real estate construction
Residential real estate
Home equity lines of credit
Consumer
Deposit account overdrafts
Total loans
Credit Quality Indicators
Loans Past Due
$
30 - 59 days 60 - 89 days
5,378
$
11
–
2,022
119
58
–
7,588
3,208
563
4
4,321
725
186
–
9,007
$
$
90 + Days
14,652
$
247
815
1,959
–
458
–
18,131
$
Total
23,238
821
819
8,302
844
702
–
34,726
$
$
Current
Loans
429,637
152,371
21,659
191,973
47,286
80,865
2,201
925,992
$
$
Total
Loans
452,875
153,192
22,478
200,275
48,130
81,567
2,201
960,718
$
$
As discussed in Note 1, Peoples categorizes the majority of its loans into risk categories based upon an established risk
grading matrix based on a scale of 1 to 8. A description of the general characteristics of the risk grades used by Peoples is
as follows:
“Pass” (grades 1 through 4): Loans in this risk category involve borrowers of acceptable-to-strong credit
quality and risk who have the apparent ability to satisfy their loan obligations. Loan in this risk grade would
possess sufficient mitigating factors, such as adequate collateral or strong guarantors possessing the capacity
to repay the debt if required, for any weakness that may exist.
73
“Watch” (grade 5): Loans in this risk grade are the equivalent of the regulatory definition of “Other Assets
Especially Mentioned” classification. Loans in this category possess some credit deficiency or potential
weakness, which requires a high level of management attention. Potential weaknesses include declining
trends in operating earnings and cash flows and /or reliance on the secondary source of repayment. If left
uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in noticeable deterioration of the repayment prospects for
the asset or in Peoples’ credit position.
“Substandard” (grade 6): Loans in this risk grade are inadequately protected by the borrower’s current
financial condition and payment capability or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified have a
well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the orderly repayment of debt. They are characterized
by the distinct possibility that the bank will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.
“Doubtful” (grade 7): Loans in this risk grade have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified as
substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or orderly repayment in full,
on the basis of current existing facts, conditions and values, highly questionable and improbable. Possibility
of loss is extremely high, but because of certain important and reasonably specific factors that may work to
the advantage and strengthening of the exposure, its classification as an estimate loss is deferred until its more
exact status may be determined.
“Loss” (grade 8): Loans in this risk grade are considered to be non-collectible and of such little value that
their continuance as bankable assets is not warranted. This does not mean the loan has absolutely no recovery
value, but rather it is neither practical nor desirable to defer writing off the loan, even though partial recovery
may be obtained in the future. Charge-offs against the allowance for loan losses are taken in the period in
which the loan becomes uncollectible. Consequently, Peoples typically does not maintain a recorded
investment in loans within this category.
Consumer loans and other smaller-balance loans are evaluated and classified as “substandard”; “doubtful” or “loss”
based upon the regulatory definition of these classes and consistent with regulatory requirements. Loans not evaluated
individually nor meeting any of the regulatory conditions to be classifications, as describe above, would be classified as
“not rated”.
The following table summarizes the risk category of Peoples’ loan portfolio based upon on the most recent analysis
performed as of December 31, 2010:
(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial real estate
Commercial and industrial
Real estate construction
Residential real estate
Home equity lines of credit
Consumer
Deposit account overdrafts
Total loans
Pass Rated Watch
(Grade 5)
(Grades 1 - 4)
$
49,901
$
320,306
6,325
122,874
3,017
14,991
2,135
5,186
339
283
–
89
–
–
61,717
463,729
$
$
Subtandard Doubtful
(Grade 7)
$
–
247
–
–
–
–
–
247
(Grade 6)
$
77,634
9,427
3,495
8,031
2,106
–
–
100,693
$
$
Not
Rated
5,034
14,319
975
184,923
45,402
81,478
2,201
334,332
$
$
Total
Loans
452,875
153,192
22,478
200,275
48,130
81,567
2,201
960,718
$
$
Impaired Loans
The following tables summarize loans classified as impaired at December 31, 2010:
(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial real estate
Commercial and industrial
Real estate construction
Residential real estate
Home equity lines of credit
Total impaired loans
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
58,178
$
2,333
1,755
1,170
522
63,958
$
Recorded Investment
Without
With
Total
Recorded
Related
Average
Recored
Interest
Income
$
$
$
Allowance Allowance Investment Allowance Investment Recognized
10
$
5
–
9
–
24
27,550
729
485
506
–
29,270
33,953
1,815
815
1,137
520
38,240
21,361
1,713
913
867
535
25,389
6,403
1,086
330
631
520
8,970
1,789
572
22
320
254
2,957
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Peoples’ average recorded investment in impaired loans was $38.1 million in 2009 and $25.6 million in 2008, while
interest income recognized on impaired loans was $19,000 and $108,000, respectively.
74
Certain loans included in the nonaccrual loan totals above are not considered impaired and evaluated individually by
Peoples. These loans consist primarily of smaller balance homogenous consumer and residential real estate loans that are
collectively evaluated for impairment and totaled $2.1 million at December 31, 2010.
Related Party Loans
In the normal course of its business, Peoples Bank has granted loans to executive officers and directors of Peoples.
Related party loans were made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates charged and collateral required, as
those prevailing at the time for comparable loans with unrelated persons and did not involve more than normal risk of
collectibility. At December 31, 2010, no related party loan was past due 90 or more days, renegotiated or on nonaccrual
status. Activity in related party loans is presented in the table below. Other changes primarily consist of changes in related
party status during the year.
(Dollars in thousands)
Balance, December 31, 2009
New loans and disbursements
Repayments
Other changes
Balance, December 31, 2010
$
$
8,783
3,494
(1,245)
(4,731)
6,301
Allowance for Loan Losses
Changes in the allowance for loan losses for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010, were as
follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
Balance, beginning of year
Charge-offs
Recoveries
Net charge-offs
Provision for loan losses
Balance, end of year
2010
$ 27,257
(30,181)
2,774
(27,407)
26,916
$ 26,766
2009
$ 22,931
(23,922)
2,527
(21,395)
25,721
$ 27,257
2008
$ 15,718
(21,969)
1,542
(20,427)
27,640
$ 22,931
Note 5. Bank Premises and Equipment
The major categories of bank premises and equipment and accumulated depreciation at December 31 are summarized
as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
Land
Building and premises
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
Total bank premises and equipment
Accumulated depreciation
Net book value
2010
$
5,690
32,060
18,190
55,940
(31,006)
$ 24,934
2009
$
5,699
31,358
18,377
55,434
(30,590)
$ 24,844
Peoples depreciates its building and premises and furniture, fixtures and equipment over estimated useful lives
generally ranging from 5 to 40 years and 2 to 10 years, respectively. Depreciation expense was $1,943,000, $1,998,000 and
$2,066,000, in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Leases
Peoples leases certain banking facilities and equipment under various agreements with original terms providing for
fixed monthly payments over periods generally ranging from two to ten years. Certain leases contain renewal options and
rent escalation clauses calling for rent increases over the term of the lease. All leases which contain a rent escalation clause
are accounted for on a straight-line basis. Rent expense was $916,000, $901,000 and $739,000 in 2010, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
75
Peoples leases certain properties from related parties. Payments related to these leases totaled $166,000, $160,000 and
$162,000 in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The terms of these leases are substantially the same as those offered for
comparable transactions with non-related parties at the time the lease transactions were consummated.
The future minimum payments under noncancellable operating leases with initial or remaining terms of one year or
more consisted of the following at December 31, 2010: $865,000 in 2011; $868,000 in 2012; $846,000 in 2013; $599,000
in 2014; $434,000 in 2015 and $1,943,000 thereafter.
Note 6. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill
There were no changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009. Peoples
performed the required goodwill impairment tests and concluded the recorded value of goodwill was not impaired as of De-
cember 31, 2010, based upon the estimated fair value of the single reporting unit.
Other intangible assets
Other intangible assets were comprised of the following at December 31:
(Dollars in thousands)
2010
Core deposits
Customer relationships
Total acquired intangibles
Mortgage servicing rights
Total other intangible assets
2009
Core deposits
Customer relationships
Total acquired intangibles
Mortgage servicing rights
Total other intangible assets
Gross
Intangible
Asset
Accumulated
Amortization
Net
Intangible
Asset
$
$
$
$
10,564
6,182
16,746
10,564
6,182
16,746
$
$
$
$
(10,190)
(5,559)
(15,749)
(9,719)
(5,112)
(14,831)
$
$
$
$
$
$
374
623
997
1,353
2,350
845
1,070
1,915
1,164
3,079
The estimated aggregate future amortization expense of core deposit and customer relationship intangible assets at
December 31, 2010, is as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
2011
2012
2013
Total
Core
Deposits
270
$
104
–
374
$
$
Customer
Relationships
316
202
105
623
$
Total
$
$
586
306
105
997
The following is an analysis of activity of MSRs for the years ended December 31:
(Dollars in thousands)
Balance, beginning of year
Amortization
Servicing rights originated
Balance, end of year
2010
2009
2008
$
$
1,164
(385)
574
1,353
$
$
719
(406)
851
1,164
$
$
756
(318)
281
719
No valuation allowances were required at December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 for Peoples’ MSRs since the fair value
exceeded the book value.
76
Note 7. Deposits
Peoples’ deposit balances were comprised of the following at December 31:
(Dollars in thousands)
Retail certificates of deposit:
$100,000 or more
Less than $100,000
Total retail certificates of deposit
Interest-bearing transaction accounts
Money market deposit accounts
Savings accounts
Total retail interest-bearing deposits
Brokered certificates of deposits
Total interest-bearing deposits
Non-interest-bearing deposits
Total deposit balances
2010
2009
$
$
202,001
228,885
430,886
215,350
289,657
123,173
1,059,066
87,465
1,146,531
215,069
1,361,600
$
$
214,933
265,579
480,512
229,232
263,257
122,465
1,095,466
102,420
1,197,886
198,000
1,395,886
The contractual maturities of certificates of deposits for each of the next five years and thereafter are as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Thereafter
Total maturities
Retail
218,684
111,393
58,239
20,177
21,931
462
430,886
$
$
Brokered
23,538
$
11,457
3,705
12,087
5,834
30,844
87,465
$
Total
$ 242,222
122,850
61,944
32,264
27,765
31,306
$ 518,351
Deposits from related parties approximated $10.5 million and $8.8 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
Note 8.
Short-Term Borrowings
Peoples utilizes various short-term borrowings as sources of funds, which are summarized as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
2010
Ending balance
Average balance
Highest month end balance
Interest expense
Weighted-average interest rate:
End of year
During the year
Retail
Repurchase
Agreements
FHLB
Advances
Other Short-
Term
Borrowings
$
$
51,509
50,115
51,762
252
0.41%
0.50%
$
–
8,712
57,400
10
– %
0.11%
–
69
–
–
– %
– %
77
(Dollars in thousands)
2009
Ending balance
Average balance
Highest month end balance
Interest expense
Weighted-average interest rate:
End of year
During the year
2008
Ending balance
Average balance
Highest month end balance
Interest expense
Weighted-average interest rate:
End of year
During the year
Retail
Repurchase
Agreements
FHLB
Advances
Other Short-
Term
Borrowings
$
$
$
$
51,921
52,905
53,931
468
0.54%
0.88%
54,452
39,329
56,079
813
1.26%
2.07%
$
$
25,000
6,867
25,000
13
0.09%
0.19%
30,000
102,146
186,100
2,557
0.34%
2.50%
–
150
10,000
1
– %
0.67%
14,400
1,195
14,400
13
0.50%
1.09%
Peoples’ retail repurchase agreements consist of overnight agreements with Peoples’ commercial customers and serve
as a cash management tool.
The FHLB advances consist of overnight borrowings and other advances with an original maturity of one year or less.
These advances, along with the long-term advances disclosed in Note 9, are collateralized by residential mortgage loans and
investment securities. Peoples’ borrowing capacity with the FHLB is based on the amount of collateral pledged and the
amount of FHLB common stock owned.
Other short-term borrowings consist of Federal Funds purchased and advances from the Federal Reserve Discount
Window. Federal Funds purchased are short-term borrowings from correspondent banks that typically mature within one to
ninety days. Peoples has available Federal Funds of $25 million from certain of its correspondent banks. Interest on
Federal Funds purchased is set daily by the correspondent bank based on prevailing market rates. The Federal Reserve
Discount Window provides credit facilities to financial institutions, which are designed to ensure adequate liquidity by
providing a source of short-term funds. Discount Window advances are typically overnight and must be secured by
collateral acceptable to the lending Federal Reserve Bank.
Note 9. Long-Term Borrowings
Long-term borrowings consisted of the following:
(Dollars in thousands)
Callable national market repurchase agreements
FHLB convertible rate advances
FHLB putable non-amortizing, fixed rate advances
FHLB amortizing, fixed rate advances
FHLB non-amortizing, fixed rate advances
Total long-term borrowings
2010
2009
Weighted-
Average
Rate
3.43%
4.81%
3.28%
3.58%
3.13%
3.45%
Weighted-
Average
Rate
4.01%
4.81%
3.28%
3.56%
3.90%
3.82%
Balance
$ 145,000
7,500
60,000
18,613
15,000
$ 246,113
Balance
$
65,000
7,500
60,000
20,203
5,000
$ 157,703
Peoples’ national market repurchase agreements consist of agreements with unrelated financial service companies
and have original maturities ranging from 3 to 10 years. In general, these agreements may not be terminated by Peo-
ples prior to the maturity without incurring additional costs. The callable agreements contain call option features, in
which the buyer has the right, at its discretion, to terminate the repurchase agreement after an initial period ranging
78
from 3 months to 5 years. After the initial call period, the buyer has the right to terminate the agreement on a quar-
terly basis thereafter until maturity. If the buyer exercises its option, Peoples would be required to repay the agree-
ment in whole at the quarterly date. During the third quarter of 2010, Peoples prepaid $60.0 million of repurchase
agreements resulting in early termination fees of $3.6 million. These repurchase agreements had a weighted-average
cost of 4.53% and were scheduled to mature over the next two fiscal years.
The FHLB advances consist of various borrowings with original maturities ranging from 3 to 20 years that gener-
ally may not be repaid prior to maturity without Peoples incurring a penalty. The rate on the convertible rate advances
are fixed from initial periods ranging from one to four years, depending on the specific advance. After the initial fixed
rate period, the FHLB has the option to convert each advance to a LIBOR based, variable rate advance. If the FHLB
exercises its option, Peoples may repay the advance in whole or in part on the conversion date or any subsequent re-
pricing date without a prepayment fee. At all other times, early repayment of any convertible rate advance would re-
sult in Peoples incurring a prepayment penalty. For the putable advances, the FHLB has the option, at its sole discre-
tion following an initial period of three months, to terminate the debt and require Peoples to repay the advance prior to
the final stated maturity. After the initial period, the FHLB has the option to terminate the debt on a quarterly basis.
If the advance is terminated prior to maturity, the FHLB will offer Peoples replacement funding at the then-prevailing
rate on an advance product then-offered by the FHLB, subject to normal FHLB underwriting criteria. As discussed in
Note 8, long-term FHLB advances are collateralized by assets owned by Peoples.
The aggregate minimum annual retirements of long-term borrowings in future periods are as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Thereafter
Total long-term borrowings
Weighted-
Average
Rate
4.03%
3.58%
3.67%
3.55%
3.55%
3.36%
3.45%
Balance
15,391
7,407
2,225
1,721
1,466
129,493
157,703
$
$
Note 10. Junior Subordinated Notes Held By Subsidiary Trust
Peoples previously formed a statutory business trust (the “Trust”) for the purpose of issuing corporation-obligated
mandatorily redeemable capital securities (the “Capital Securities” or “Trust Preferred Securities”), with 100% of the
common equity in the Trust owned by Peoples. The proceeds from the Capital Securities and common equity were
invested in junior subordinated debt securities of Peoples (the “Debentures”).
The Debentures held by the trust are the sole assets of the trust. Distributions on the Capital Securities are payable
semiannually at a rate per annum equal to the interest rate being earned by the Trust on the Debentures and are recorded as
interest expense by Peoples. Since the Trust is a variable interest entity and Peoples is not deemed to be the primary
beneficiary, the Trust is not included in Peoples’ Consolidated Financial Statements. As a result, Peoples includes the
Debentures as a separate category of long-term debt on the Consolidated Balance Sheets entitled “Junior Subordinated
Notes Held by Subsidiary Trust” and the related expense as interest expense on the Consolidated Statements of Income.
Under the provisions of the Debentures, Peoples has the right to defer payment of interest on the Debentures at any
time, or from time to time, for periods not exceeding five years. If interest payments on the Debentures are deferred, the
dividends on the Capital Securities are also deferred and Peoples will be prohibited from paying dividends on its common
shares. Interest on the Debentures is cumulative. Peoples has entered into agreements which, taken collectively, fully and
unconditionally guarantee the Capital Securities subject to the terms of each of the guarantees.
The Capital Securities are mandatorily redeemable upon maturity of the Debentures on May 1, 2029, and Peoples has
the right to redeem the Debentures, in whole or in part, after May 1, 2009. If redeemed prior to maturity, the redemption
price of the Debentures will be the principal amount, plus any unpaid accrued interest, and a premium if redeemed before
2019.
Under the risk-based capital standards for bank holding companies adopted by the Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System, the Trust Preferred Securities qualify as Tier 1 capital for regulatory capital purposes, subject to certain
quantitative limits and qualitative standards. Specifically, the aggregate amount of trust preferred securities and certain
79
other capital elements that qualify as Tier 1 capital is limited to 25% of core capital elements, net of goodwill, with the
excess amount not qualifying for Tier 1 capital being included in Tier 2 capital. Additionally, trust preferred securities no
longer qualify for Tier 1 capital within five years of their maturity. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, the entire amount of
the outstanding Trust Preferred Securities qualified as Tier 1 capital.
Note 11. Stockholders’ Equity
The following table details the progression in shares of Peoples’ preferred, common and treasury stock during the
period presented:
Shares at December 31, 2007
Changes related to stock-based compensation awards:
Exercise of stock options for common shares
Purchase of treasury stock
Common shares issued inder dividend reinvestment plan
Shares at December 31, 2008
Issuance of preferred shares
Changes related to stock-based compensation awards:
Release of restricted common shares
Changes related to deferred compensation plan:
Purchase of treasury stock
Reissuance of treasury stock
Common shares issued under dividend reinvestment plan
Shares at December 31, 2009
Changes related to stock-based compensation awards:
Release of restricted common shares
Exercise of common stock options
Changes related to deferred compensation plan:
Purchase of treasury stock
Reissuance of treasury stock
Common shares issued under dividend reinvestment plan
Shares at December 31, 2010
Preferred
Stock
–
–
–
–
–
39,000
Common
Stock
10,925,954
7,475
–
41,935
10,975,364
–
Treasury
Stock
629,206
(11,093)
23,367
–
641,480
–
–
3,415
–
–
–
–
39,000
–
–
–
–
–
39,000
–
–
53,113
11,031,892
7,202
–
–
–
30,928
11,070,022
17,984
(2,209)
–
657,255
–
(31,008)
11,855
(25,407)
–
612,695
Under its Amended Articles of Incorporation, Peoples is authorized to issue up to 50,000 preferred shares, in one
or more series, having such voting powers, designations, preferences, rights, qualifications, limitations and restrictions
as determined by the Board of Directors. In 2009, Peoples’ Board of Directors created a series of preferred shares
designated as Peoples’ Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Shares, Series A, each without par value and
having a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share, and fixed 39,000 shares as the authorized number of such shares
(the “Series A Preferred Shares”). These Series A Preferred Shares subsequently were sold to the United States
Department of the Treasury (the “U.S. Treasury”), along with a ten-year warrant (the “Warrant”) to purchase 313,505
Peoples common shares at an exercise price of $18.66 per share (subject to certain anti-dilution and other
adjustments), for an aggregate purchase price of $39 million in cash in connection with Peoples’ participation in the
U.S. Treasury’s TARP Capital Purchase Program.
The Series A Preferred Shares accrue cumulative quarterly dividends at a rate of 5% per annum from January 30,
2009 to, but excluding February 15, 2014, and 9% per annum thereafter. These dividends will be paid only if, as and
when declared by Peoples’ Board of Directors. The Series A Preferred Shares have no maturity date and rank senior
to the common shares with respect to the payment of dividends and distributions and amounts payable upon
liquidation, dissolution and winding up of Peoples. Peoples has the option to redeem the Series A Preferred Shares at
100% of their liquidation preference plus accrued and unpaid dividends, subject to the approval of the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the Office of the Comptroller of Currency. The Series A Preferred
Shares are generally non-voting.
The U.S. Treasury has agreed not to exercise voting power with respect to any common shares issued to it upon
exercise of the Warrant. Any common shares issued by Peoples upon exercise of the Warrant will be issued from
80
common shares held in treasury to the extent available. If no treasury shares are available, common shares will be
issued from authorized but unissued common shares.
The Securities Purchase Agreement, pursuant to which the Series A Preferred Shares and the Warrant were sold,
contains limitations on the payment of dividends on the common shares after January 30, 2009. Prior to the earlier of
(i) January 30, 2012 and (ii) the date on which the Series A Preferred Shares have been redeemed in whole or the U.S.
Treasury has transferred the Series A Preferred Shares to third parties which are not Affiliates (as defined in the
Securities Purchase Agreement) of the U.S. Treasury, any increase in common share dividends by Peoples or any of
its subsidiaries would be prohibited without the prior approval of the U.S. Treasury.
If the Series A Preferred Shares were redeemed in full, Peoples would have the right to repurchase the Warrant at
its appraised value. Otherwise, the U.S. Treasury must liquidate the related Warrant at the current market price.
On February 2, 2011, Peoples completed the repurchase of 21,000 shares of its Series A Preferred Shares held by
the U.S Treasury, for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $21,224,583, which included a pro rata accrued
dividend of approximately $224,583.
Note 12. Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The components of other comprehensive income (loss) for the years ended December 31 were as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
Net income
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Available-for-sale investment securities:
Gross unrealized holding (loss) gain arising in the period
Related tax benefit (expense)
Non-credit losses arising on securities during the period
Related tax benefit
Less: reclassification adjustment for net gain (loss) included in earnings
Related tax (expense) benefit
Net effect on other comprehensive income (loss)
Defined benefit plans:
Net gain (loss) arising during the period
Related tax (expense) benefit
Amortization of unrecognized loss and service cost on pension plan
Related tax expense
Net effect on other comprehensive income (loss)
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
Total comprehensive income (loss)
2010
2009
2008
$
5,581
$
4,190
$
7,455
(18,174)
6,361
–
–
5,066
(1,773)
(15,106)
1,640
(574)
155
(55)
1,166
(13,940)
(8,359)
$
26,573
(9,301)
(166)
58
(6,261)
2,190
21,235
1,151
(403)
148
(52)
844
22,079
26,269
$
(20,941)
7,329
–
–
(2,592)
907
(11,927)
(5,206)
1,822
13
(4)
(3,375)
(15,302)
(7,847)
$
81
Changes in the components of Peoples’ accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for years ended December 31,
2010, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
Balance, December 31, 2007
Current period change, net of tax
Balance, December 31, 2008
Current period change, net of tax
Cumulative effect adjustment for non-credit
portion of previously recorded OTTI losses
Balance, December 31, 2009
Current period change, net of tax
Balance, December 31, 2010
Unrealized
Gain (Loss)
on Securities
$
4,064
(11,927)
(7,863)
21,235
$
(304)
13,068
(15,106)
(2,038)
$
$
Net Pension and
Postretirement
Costs
$
$
$
$
(1,050)
(3,375)
(4,425)
844
–
(3,581)
1,166
(2,415)
Accumulated
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
$
3,014
(15,302)
(12,288)
22,079
$
(304)
9,487
(13,940)
(4,453)
$
$
Note 13. Employee Benefit Plans
Peoples sponsors a noncontributory defined benefit pension plan that covers substantially all employees hired before
January 1, 2010. The plan provides retirement benefits based on an employee’s years of service and compensation. For
employees hired before January 1, 2003, the amount of postretirement benefit is based on the employee’s average monthly
compensation pay over the highest five consecutive years out of the employee’s last ten years with Peoples while an
eligible employee. For employees hired on or after January 1, 2003, the amount of postretirement benefit is based on 2% of
the employee’s annual compensation plus accrued interest. Effective January 1, 2010, the pension plan was closed to new
entrants. On November 18, 2010, Peoples’ Board of Directors authorized a freeze of the accrual of pension plan benefits,
which will occur effective March 1, 2011. Peoples recognized this freeze as a curtailment as of December 31, 2010, since
no participant would accrue any additional benefits between December 31, 2010 and March 1, 2011, under the terms of the
pension plan. Peoples also has a contributory postretirement benefit plan for former employees who were retired as of
December 31, 1992. The plan provides health and life insurance benefits. Peoples’ policy is to fund the cost of the benefits
as they are incurred.
The following tables provide a reconciliation of the changes in the plans’ benefit obligations and fair value of assets
over the two-year period ending December 31, 2010, and a statement of the funded status as of December 31, 2010 and
2009:
(Dollars in thousands)
Change in benefit obligation:
Obligation at January 1
Service cost
Interest cost
Plan participants’ contributions
Actuarial loss (gain)
Benefit payments
Increase due to plan changes
Curtailment
Obligation at December 31
Accumulated benefit obligation at December 31
Pension
Benefits
2010
2009
Postretirement
Benefits
2010
2009
$ 13,075
750
785
–
472
(849)
–
(1,732)
$ 12,501
$ 12,501
$ 12,938
799
785
–
(82)
(1,365)
–
–
$ 13,075
$ 11,379
$
$
$
243
–
13
135
(14)
(167)
21
–
231
–
$
$
$
226
–
16
128
11
(138)
–
–
243
–
82
(Dollars in thousands)
Change in plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets at January 1
Actual return on plan assets
Employer contributions
Plan participants’ contributions
Benefit payments
Fair value of plan assets at December 31
Funded status:
Funded status at December 31
Unrecognized prior service cost
Unrecognized net loss
Net amount recognized
Amounts recognized in Consolidated Balance Sheets:
Prepaid benefit costs
Accrued benefit liability
Net amount recognized
Pension
Benefits
2010
2009
Postretirement
Benefits
2010
2009
$ 11,886
1,506
–
–
(849)
$ 12,543
$
9,840
2,261
1,150
–
(1,365)
$ 11,886
$
$
$
$
42
–
–
42
42
–
42
$ (1,189)
–
–
$ (1,189)
$
–
(1,189)
$ (1,189)
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
–
–
32
135
(167)
–
(231)
–
–
(231)
–
(231)
(231)
3
55
58
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
–
–
10
128
(138)
–
(243)
–
–
(243)
–
(243)
(243)
18
52
70
Amounts recognized in Accumulated Comprehensive Income (Loss):
Unrecognized prior service cost
Unrecognized net loss
$
Total
$
–
2,420
2,420
$
$
18
3,568
3,586
Weighted-average assumptions at year-end:
Discount rate
Rate of compensation increase
5.70%
2.50%
6.40%
2.50%
5.70%
n/a
6.40%
n/a
The estimated costs relating to Peoples’ pension benefits that will be amortized from accumulated comprehensive
income (loss) into net periodic cost over the next fiscal year are $34,000 of net loss.
Net Periodic Benefit Cost
The following table provides the components of net periodic benefit cost for the plans:
(Dollars in thousands)
Service cost
Interest cost
Expected return on plan assets
Amortization of prior service cost
Amortization of net loss
Curtailment
Net periodic benefit cost
Weighted-average assumptions:
Discount rate
Expected return on plan assets
Rate of compensation increase
Pension Benefits
2009
2010
2008
$
$
750
785
(1,149)
4
151
23
564
$
$
799
785
(1,194)
4
145
–
539
$
$
763
781
(1,202)
4
10
–
356
Postretirement Benefits
2009
2010
2008
$
$
–
13
–
(3)
(9)
$
1
$
–
16
–
(3)
(3)
–
10
$
$
–
15
–
–
(7)
–
8
6.40%
8.50%
2.50%
6.30%
8.50%
2.50%
6.70%
8.50%
3.50%
6.40%
n/a
n/a
6.30%
n/a
n/a
6.70%
n/a
n/a
For measurement purposes, a 10% annual rate of increase in the per capita cost of covered benefits (i.e., health care
cost trend rate) was assumed for 2010, grading down 1% per year to an ultimate rate of 5% in 2015. The health care trend
rate assumption does not have a significant effect on the contributory defined benefit postretirement plan; therefore, a one
83
percentage point increase or decrease in the trend rate is not material in the determination of the accumulated postretirement
benefit obligation or the ongoing expense.
Determination of Expected Long-term Rate of Return
The expected long-term rate of return on the plans’ total assets is based on the expected return of each category of the
plan’s assets. Management considers the long-term historical returns of the assets within the portfolio and adjusts the rate,
as necessary, for expected future returns on the assets in the plans in determining the rate.
Plan Assets
Peoples’ investment strategy, as established by Peoples’ Retirement Plan Committee, is to invest assets based upon
established target allocations, which include a target range of 60-75% allocation in equity securities, 24-39% in debt
securities and approximately 1% of other investments. The assets are reallocated periodically to meet the target allocations.
The investment policy is reviewed periodically, under the advisement of a certified investment advisor, to determine if the
policy should be changed.
The following table provides the fair values of investments held in Peoples’ pension plan at December 31, by major
asset category:
(Dollars in thousands)
Fair Value
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
2010
Equity securities
Debt securities
Other
Total fair value of pension assets
2009
Equity securities
Debt securities
Other
Total fair value of pension assets
$
10,487
1,705
351
$ 12,543
$
9,357
1,945
584
$ 11,886
$
$
$
$
10,487
1,071
–
11,558
9,357
924
–
10,281
$
$
$
$
–
634
351
985
–
1,021
584
1,605
The equity securities measured at fair value consist primarily of stock mutual funds (Level 1 inputs) and common and
collective trust funds (Level 2 inputs). Debt securities include corporate bonds and bond mutual funds (Level 1 inputs),
U.S. government and agency securities and obligations of state and political subdivisions (Level 2 inputs). Other
investments consist of cash, money market deposits, and certificates of deposit (Level 2 inputs). For further information
regarding levels of input used to measure fair value, please refer to Note 2.
Equity securities of Peoples’ pension plan did not include any securities of Peoples or related parties in 2010 or 2009.
Cash Flows
Peoples has not determined if any contributions will be made to its pension plan in 2010; however, actual contributions
are made at the discretion of the Retirement Plan Committee and Peoples’ Board of Directors. Estimated future benefit
payments, which reflect benefits attributable to estimated future service, for the years ending December 31 are as follows:
Pension
Benefits
Post-
retirement
Benefits
$
$
922
1,604
940
1,017
791
4,122
9,396
$
$
30
29
28
26
25
96
234
(Dollars in thousands)
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016 to 2020
Total
84
Retirement Savings Plan
Peoples also maintains a retirement savings plan, or 401(k) plan, which covers substantially all employees. The plan
provides participants the opportunity to save for retirement on a tax-deferred basis. During 2009 and in prior years, Peoples
made matching contributions equal to 100% of participants’ contributions that did not exceed 3% of the participants’
compensation, plus 50% of participants’ contributions between 3% and 5% of the participants’ compensation. Effective
January 1, 2010, Peoples began making matching contributions equal to 100% of participants’ contributions that do not
exceed 2% of the participants’ compensation. Beginning January 1, 2011, matching contributions will equal 100% of
participants’ contributions that did not exceed 3% of the participants’ compensation, plus 50% of participants’ contributions
between 3% and 5% of the participants’ compensation. Matching contributions made by Peoples totaled $425,000,
$775,000 and $776,000 for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Note 14.
Income Taxes
The reported income tax expense and effective tax rate in the Consolidated Statements of Income differs from the
amounts computed by applying the statutory corporate tax rate as follows for the years ended December 31:
(Dollars in thousands)
Income tax computed at statutory federal tax rate
Differences in rate resulting from:
Tax-exempt interest income
Investments in tax credit funds
Bank owned life insurance
Change in valuation allowance
Other, net
Total income tax (benefit) expense
2010
2009
Amount
1,956
$
Rate
34.0% $
Amount
1,063
Rate
34.0% $
2008
Amount
2,665
(808)
(715)
(207)
–
(54)
172
(14.1%)
(921)
(12.4%)
(625)
(3.6%)
(357)
–.–%
–
(224)
(0.9%)
3.0% $ (1,064)
(29.5%)
(20.0%)
(11.4%)
–.–%
(7.2%)
(34.1%)
$
(924)
(689)
(554)
(321)
(17)
160
$
Rate
35.0%
(12.1%)
(9.0%)
(7.3%)
(4.2%)
(0.3%)
2.1%
Peoples’ reported income tax expense consisted of the following for the years ended December 31:
(Dollars in thousands)
Current income tax
Deferred income tax
Total income tax (benefit) expense
2010
$
$
1,986
(1,814)
172
2009
$
4,148
(5,212)
$ (1,064)
2008
$
$
3,021
(2,861)
160
The significant components of Peoples' deferred tax assets and liabilities consisted of the following at December 31:
(Dollars in thousands)
Deferred tax assets:
Allowance for loan losses
Accrued employee benefits
Available-for-sale securities
Investments
AMT credit carryforward
Other
Total deferred tax assets
Deferred tax liabilities:
Bank premises and equipment
Deferred income
Deferred net loan costs
Available-for-sale securities
Other
Total deferred tax liabilities
Net deferred tax asset
85
2010
2009
$
$
9,960
946
1,098
2,607
6,096
311
21,018
1,386
1,110
338
–
4,660
7,494
13,524
$
$
10,002
1,482
–
2,229
3,676
283
17,672
1,317
1,170
389
7,036
3,556
13,468
4,204
The AMT tax credit carryforward at December 31, 2010 and 2009 may be carried over indefinitely. No valuation
allowance for deferred tax assets was required at December 31, 2010, as it is more likely than not that all of the deferred tax
assets will be realized in future periods. The related federal income tax expense on securities transactions approximated
$2,398,000 in 2010, $506,000 in 2009 and $584,000 in 2008.
Peoples’ income tax returns are subject to review and examination by federal and state taxing authorities. Peoples is
currently open to audit under the applicable statutes of limitations by the Internal Revenue Service for the years ended
December 31, 2006 through 2008. The years open to examination by state taxing authorities vary by jurisdiction.
Note 15. Earnings Per Share
The calculations of basic and diluted earnings per common share for years ended December 31 were as follows:
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Net income
Preferred dividends
Net income available to common shareholders
Weighted-average common shares outstanding
Effect of potentially dilutive common shares
Total weighted-average diluted common
shares outstanding
Earnings per common share:
Basic
Diluted
2010
2009
2008
5,581
2,052
3,529
$
4,190
1,876
2,314
$
7,455
-
7,455
10,424,474
7,516
10,363,975
10,817
10,315,263
33,316
10,431,990
10,374,792
10,348,579
0.34
0.34
$
$
0.22
0.22
$
$
0.72
0.72
$
$
$
As disclosed in Note 11, during 2009 Peoples issued a warrant to purchase 313,505 common shares, which remained
outstanding at December 31, 2010. This warrant was excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per common share
since it was anti-dilutive. In addition, stock options and SARs covering 243,560; 285,678 and 282,604 common shares
were excluded from the calculations for 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, since they were anti-dilutive.
Note 16. Financial Instruments with Off-Balance Sheet Risk
In the normal course of business, Peoples is party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk necessary to meet
the financing needs of customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of
credit. The instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the amount recognized in the
Consolidated Balance Sheets. The contract amounts of these instruments express the extent of involvement Peoples has in
these financial instruments.
Loan Commitments and Standby Letters of Credit
Loan commitments are made to accommodate the financial needs of Peoples' customers. Standby letters of credit are
instruments issued by Peoples Bank guaranteeing the beneficiary payment by Peoples Bank in the event of default by
Peoples Bank's customer in the nonperformance of an obligation or service. Historically, most loan commitments and
standby letters of credit expire unused. Peoples' exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the counter-party
to the financial instrument for loan commitments and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount of
those instruments. Peoples uses the same underwriting standards in making commitments and conditional obligations as it
does for on-balance sheet instruments. The amount of collateral obtained is based on management's credit evaluation of the
customer. Collateral held varies, but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant, and equipment, and
income-producing commercial properties.
86
The total amounts of loan commitments and standby letters of credit at December 31 are summarized as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
Home equity lines of credit
Unadvanced construction loans
Other loan commitments
Loan commitments
Contractual Amount
2010
2009
$ 40,169
$ 40,021
6,107
12,921
113,072
108,995
166,162
155,123
Standby letters of credit
$ 42,097
$ 44,048
Other
Peoples also has commitments to make additional capital contributions in low-income housing projects. Such
commitments approximated $0.6 million at December 31, 2010, and $0.9 million at December 31, 2009. The maximum
aggregate amounts Peoples could be required to make for each of the next four years are as follows: $229,000 in 2011;
$186,000 in 2012; $127,000 in 2013 and $57,000 in 2014.
Note 17. Regulatory Matters
The following is a summary of certain regulatory matters affecting Peoples and its subsidiaries:
Limits on Dividends
The primary source of funds for the dividends paid by Peoples is dividends received from Peoples Bank. The payment
of dividends by Peoples Bank is subject to various banking regulations. The most restrictive provision requires regulatory
approval if dividends declared in any calendar year exceed the total net profits of that year plus the retained net profits of
the preceding two years. At December 31, 2010, Peoples Bank had approximately $1.6 million of net profits available for
distribution to Peoples as dividends without regulatory approval.
Federal Reserve Requirements
Peoples Bank is required to maintain a minimum level of reserves, consisting of cash on hand and non-interest-bearing
balances with the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, based on the amount of deposit liabilities. Average required reserve
balances were approximately $6.2 million and $5.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009.
Capital Requirements
Peoples and Peoples Bank are subject to various regulatory capital guidelines administered by the banking regulatory
agencies. Under capital adequacy requirements and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, Peoples and its
banking subsidiary must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of each entity's assets,
liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Peoples' and Peoples
Bank’s capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk
weightings and other factors. Failure to meet future minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and
possibly additional discretionary actions by the regulators that, if undertaken, could have a material effect on Peoples’
financial results.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require Peoples and Peoples Bank to
maintain minimum amounts and ratios of Total and Tier I capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as
defined), and of Tier I capital (as defined) to average assets (as defined). Peoples and Peoples Bank met all capital
adequacy requirements at December 31, 2010.
As of December 31, 2010, the most recent notifications from the banking regulatory agencies categorized Peoples and
Peoples Bank as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well
capitalized, Peoples and Peoples Bank must maintain minimum Total risk-based, Tier I risk-based and Tier I leverage ratios
as set forth in the table below. There are no conditions or events since these notifications that management believes have
changed Peoples or Peoples Bank's category.
87
Peoples and Peoples Bank’s actual capital amounts and ratios as of December 31 are also presented in the following
table:
(Dollars in thousands)
PEOPLES
Total Capital (1)
Actual
For capital adequacy
To be well capitalized
Tier 1 (2)
Actual
For capital adequacy
To be well capitalized
Tier 1 Leverage (3)
Actual
For capital adequacy
To be well capitalized
Net Risk-Weighted Assets
PEOPLES BANK
Total Capital (1)
Actual
For capital adequacy
To be well capitalized
Tier 1 (2)
Actual
For capital adequacy
To be well capitalized
Tier 1 Leverage (3)
Actual
For capital adequacy
To be well capitalized
Net Risk-Weighted Assets
December 31, 2010
Amount
Ratio
December 31, 2009
Amount
Ratio
$
$
209,738
91,967
114,959
194,407
45,983
68,975
$
194,407
73,177
91,471
$ 1,149,587
$
$
177,793
91,412
114,265
163,356
45,706
68,559
$
163,356
72,391
90,488
$ 1,142,652
18.2%
8.0%
10.0%
16.9%
4.0%
6.0%
10.6%
4.0%
5.0%
15.6%
8.0%
10.0%
14.3%
4.0%
6.0%
9.0%
4.0%
5.0%
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
209,144
99,577
124,471
192,822
49,788
74,682
192,822
76,653
95,817
1,244,707
178,798
99,150
123,938
163,161
49,575
74,363
163,161
76,277
95,346
1,239,379
16.8%
8.0%
10.0%
15.5%
4.0%
6.0%
10.1%
4.0%
5.0%
14.4%
8.0%
10.0%
13.2%
4.0%
6.0%
8.6%
4.0%
5.0%
(1) Ratio represents total capital to net risk-weighted assets
(2) Ratio represents Tier 1 capital to net risk-weighted assets
(3) Ratio represents Tier 1 capital to average assets
As more fully disclosed in Note 11, on February 2, 2011, Peoples repurchased $21.0 million of its Series A Preferred
Shares held by the U.S. Treasury, resulting in a corresponding reduction in Peoples’ Tier 1 and Total capital for regulatory
purposes.
Note 18. Stock–Based Compensation
Under the Peoples Bancorp Inc. Amended and Restated 2006 Equity Plan (the “2006 Equity Plan”) approved by
shareholders, Peoples may grant, among other awards, nonqualified stock options, incentive stock options, restricted stock
awards, stock appreciation rights or any combination thereof covering up to 500,000 common shares to employees and non-
employee directors. Prior to 2007, Peoples granted nonqualified and incentive stock options to employees and nonqualified
stock options to non-employee directors under the 2006 Equity Plan and predecessor plans. Since February 2007, Peoples
has granted a combination of restricted common shares and stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) to be settled in common
shares to employees and restricted common shares to non-employee directors subject to the terms and conditions prescribed
by the 2006 Equity Plan. In general, common shares issued in connection with stock-based awards are issued from treasury
shares to the extent available. If no treasury shares are available, common shares are issued from authorized but unissued
common shares.
88
Stock Options
Under the provisions of the 2006 Equity Plan and predecessor stock option plans, the exercise price per share of any
stock option granted may not be less than the fair market value of the underlying common shares on the date of grant of the
stock option. The most recent stock options granted to employees and non-employee directors occurred in 2006. The stock
options granted to employees will vest three years from the grant date, while the stock options granted to non-employee
directors vested six months from the grant date. All stock options granted to both employees and non-employee directors
expire ten years from the date of grant.
The following summarizes the changes to Peoples’ stock options for the year ended December 31, 2010:
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
Number of
Shares
Outstanding at January 1
Granted
Exercised
Expired
Outstanding at December 31
Exercisable at December 31
270,757
–
(34,464)
(35,175)
201,118
201,118
$
$
$
23.90
–
13.57
24.98
25.48
25.48
2.8 years
2.8 years
$
$
–
–
The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised was $86,000. The following summarizes information concerning
Peoples’ stock options outstanding at December 31, 2010:
Options Outstanding
Options Exercisable
Range of Exercise Prices
$13.59 to $21.71
$22.32 to $23.32
$23.33 to $26.00
$26.01 to $27.74
$27.75 to $28.25
$28.26 to $30.00
Total
Option Shares
Outstanding
9,876
47,640
39,780
41,354
31,058
31,410
201,118
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
1.4 years
2.0 years
1.5 years
3.2 years
4.5 years
3.9 years
2.8 years
Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price
20.08
22.32
23.97
27.08
28.25
29.02
25.48
$
Option Shares
Exercisable
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
9,876
47,640
39,780
41,354
31,058
31,410
201,118
$
20.08
22.32
23.97
27.08
28.25
29.02
25.48
Stock Appreciation Rights
SARs granted to employees have an exercise price equal to the fair market value of Peoples’ common shares on the
date of grant and will be settled using common shares of Peoples. Additionally, the SARs granted will vest three years
from the grant date and expire ten years from the date of grant. The following summarizes the changes to Peoples’ SARs
for the year ended December 31, 2010:
Outstanding at January 1
Granted
Exercised
Forfeited
Outstanding at December 31
Exercisable at December 31
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
5.6 years
4.4 years
$
$
–
–
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
$
$
$
25.80
–
–
25.17
25.97
27.70
Number
of Shares
53,756
–
–
(11,314)
42,442
23,741
89
The weighted-average estimated fair value of the SARs granted in 2010, 2009 and 2008 was $0, $0 and $5.46,
respectively. The following summarizes information concerning Peoples’ SARs outstanding at December 31, 2010:
Exercise Prices
$23.26
$23.77
$29.25
Total
Number of
Shares
Outstanding
5,000
19,936
17,506
42,442
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
2.6 years
7.1 years
4.8 years
5.6 years
Number of
Shares
Exercisable
5,000
1,235
17,506
23,741
Restricted Shares
Under the 2006 Equity Plan, Peoples may award restricted common shares to officers, key employees and non-
employee directors. In general, the restrictions on common shares awarded to non-employee directors expire after six
months, while the restrictions on common shares awarded to employees expire after three years. The following
summarizes the changes to Peoples’ restricted common shares for year ended December 31, 2010:
Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
24.48
$
14.82
26.62
23.77
19.88
$
Number
of Shares
13,991
2,000
(7,202)
(1,452)
7,337
Outstanding at January 1
Awarded
Released
Forfeited
Outstanding at December 31
The total intrinsic value of restricted stock released was $94,000, $37,000 and $158,000 in 2010, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
Stock-Based Compensation
Peoples recognized stock-based compensation expense, which is included as a component of Peoples’ salaries and
employee benefits costs, based on the estimated fair value of the awards on the grant date. The following summarizes the
amount of stock-based compensation expense and related tax benefit recognized for the years ended December 31:
Total stock-based compensation
Recognized tax benefit
Net expense recognized
2010
92,000
(32,000)
60,000
$
$
2009
149,000
(52,000)
97,000
$
$
2008
498,000
(174,000)
324,000
$
$
Restricted common shares were the only stock-based compensation awards granted by Peoples in 2009 and 2010. The
estimated fair value of SARs granted in 2008 was calculated at grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model
with the following weighted-average assumptions:
Risk-free interest rate
Dividend yield
Volatility factor of the market price of parent stock
Weighted-average expected life
2008
4.38%
3.88%
26.3%
10.0 years
The Black-Scholes option valuation model was originally developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded
options, which have different characteristics than equity awards granted by Peoples, such as no vesting or transfer
restrictions. The model requires the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected stock price volatility,
which can materially affect the fair value estimate. The expected volatility and expected life assumptions were based solely
on historical data. The expected dividend yield is computed based on the then current dividend rate, and the risk-free
90
interest rate is based on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with a remaining term approximating the expected life of the
equity awards.
Total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to unvested awards was $17,000 at December 31, 2010,
which will be recognized over a weighted-average period of 0.7 years.
Note 19. Parent Company Only Financial Information
Condensed Balance Sheets
(Dollars in thousands)
Assets:
Cash and due from other banks
Interest-bearing deposits in subsidiary bank
Receivable from subsidiary bank
Available-for-sale investment securities, at estimated fair value (amortized
cost of $1,238 and $1,394 at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively)
Investments in subsidiaries:
Bank
Non-bank
Other assets
Total assets
Liabilities:
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
Dividends payable
Junior subordinated debentures held by subsidiary trust
Total liabilities
Preferred stockholders' equity
Common stockholders' equity
Total stockholders' equity
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity
December 31,
2010
2009
$
$
$
$
50
26,116
572
3,113
200,839
28,488
1,224
260,402
5,449
1,298
22,975
29,722
38,645
192,035
230,680
260,402
$
$
$
$
996
22,780
575
2,771
216,339
28,975
1,342
273,778
5,545
1,291
22,975
29,811
38,543
205,424
243,967
273,778
Condensed Statements of Income
(Dollars in thousands)
Income:
Dividends from subsidiary bank
Dividends from non-bank subsidiary
Interest and other income
Total income
Expenses:
Interest expense on junior subordinated notes held by subsidiary trusts
Intercompany management fees
Other expense
Total expenses
Year Ended December 31,
2009
2010
2008
$
8,600
950
366
9,916
2,021
950
994
3,965
$
3,000
5,250
495
8,745
2,015
909
1,067
3,991
$
2,000
–
361
2,361
2,011
821
1,380
4,212
Income (loss) before federal income taxes and (excess dividends from) equity
in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries
Applicable income tax benefit
(Excess dividends from) equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries
Net income
5,951
(1,354)
(1,724)
5,581
$
4,754
(1,522)
(2,086)
4,190
$
(1,851)
(1,798)
7,508
7,455
$
91
Statements of Cash Flows
(Dollars in thousands)
Operating activities
Net income
Adjustment to reconcile net income to cash provided by operations:
Excess dividends from (equity in) undistributed earnings of subsidiaries
Other, net
Net cash provided by operating activities
Investing activities
Net proceeds from sales and maturities (purchases of) investment securities
Investment in subsidiaries
Change in receivable from subsidiary
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
Financing activities
Issuance of preferred shares and common stock warrant
Preferred stock dividends
Purchase of treasury stock
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
Cash dividends paid
Excess tax (expense) benefit for share based payments
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of year
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of year
Supplemental cash flow information:
Interest paid
Note 20. Summarized Quarterly Information (Unaudited)
Year Ended December 31,
2009
2010
2008
$
5,581
$
4,190
$
7,455
1,724
431
7,736
171
–
(15)
156
–
(1,950)
(181)
447
(3,822)
4
(5,502)
2,390
23,776
$ 26,166
2,086
(142)
6,134
38
(18,000)
(153)
(18,115)
39,000
(1,543)
(249)
4
(7,426)
(14)
29,772
17,791
5,985
$ 23,776
$
1,980
$
1,980
(7,508)
59
6
(45)
–
228
183
–
–
(506)
210
(8,423)
(33)
(8,752)
(8,563)
14,548
5,985
1,980
$
$
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Total interest income
Total interest expense
Net interest income
Provision for loan losses
Net impairment losses
Net gain on securities and other assets
Other income
Intangible asset amortization
FDIC insurance
Other expenses
Income tax expense (benefit)
Net income (loss)
Preferred dividends
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders
2010
First
Quarter
23,457
8,016
15,441
6,501
(986)
16
8,031
245
617
13,713
111
1,315
513
802
$
$
Second
Quarter
22,963
7,790
15,173
5,458
(800)
3,018
6,424
235
612
13,462
763
3,285
512
2,773
$
$
Third
Quarter
22,572
7,308
15,264
8,005
–
3,818
3,073
224
617
13,117
(221)
413
514
(101)
$
$
Fourth
Quarter
20,343
6,319
14,024
6,952
–
–
7,215
214
624
13,362
(481)
568
513
55
$
$
Earnings per common share - Basic
Earnings per common share - Diluted
$
$
0.08
0.08
$
$
0.27
0.27
$
$
(0.01)
(0.01)
$
$
0.01
0.01
Weighted-average common shares outstanding - Basic
Weighted-average common shares outstanding - Diluted
10,391,542
10,400,243
10,422,126
10,429,369
10,437,770
10,437,770
10,445,718
10,452,001
92
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Total interest income
Total interest expense
Net interest income
Provision for loan losses
Net impairment losses
Net gain on investment securities
Other income
Intangible asset amortization
FDIC insurance
Other expenses
Income tax expense (benefit)
Net income (loss)
Preferred dividends
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders
Earnings per common share - Basic
Earnings per common share - Diluted
2009
First
Quarter
$
Second
Quarter
$
Third
Quarter
$
Fourth
Quarter
$
26,334
10,807
15,527
4,063
–
326
8,118
330
487
13,685
1,211
4,195
341
3,854
0.37
0.37
25,745
10,315
15,430
4,734
–
262
8,302
319
1,608
13,594
893
2,846
511
2,335
0.23
0.23
25,472
10,003
15,469
10,168
(5,930)
276
7,745
307
687
13,093
(2,630)
(4,065)
512
(4,577)
(0.44)
(0.44)
24,554
9,137
15,417
6,756
(1,777)
582
7,782
296
660
13,616
(538)
1,214
512
702
0.07
0.07
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Weighted-average common shares outstanding - Basic
Weighted-average common shares outstanding - Diluted
10,344,862
10,355,280
10,360,590
10,377,105
10,372,946
10,372,946
10,376,956
10,387,400
93
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The information concerning (a) directors of Peoples Bancorp Inc. (“Peoples”), (b) the procedures by which shareholders
of Peoples may recommend nominees to Peoples’ Board of Directors, (c) the Audit Committee of Peoples’ Board of
Directors and (d) the Board of Directors’ determination that Peoples has an “audit committee financial expert” serving on its
Audit Committee required by Items 401, 407(c)(3), 407(d)(4) and 407(d)(5) of SEC Regulation S-K will be included in the
sections captioned “PROPOSAL NUMBER 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS”, “THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND
COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD” and “NOMINATING PROCEDURES” of the definitive Proxy Statement of Peoples
Bancorp Inc. relating to the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held April 28, 2011 (“Peoples’ Definitive Proxy
Statement”), which sections are incorporated herein by reference. The procedures by which shareholders of Peoples may
recommend nominees to Peoples’ Board of Directors have not changed materially from those described in Peoples’
definitive Proxy Statement for the 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on April 22, 2010.
The information regarding Peoples’ executive officers required by Item 401 of SEC Regulation S-K will be included in
the section captioned “EXECUTIVE OFFICERS” of Peoples’ Definitive Proxy Statement, which section is incorporated
herein by reference.
The information required by Item 405 of SEC Regulation S-K will be included under the caption “SECTION 16(a)
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE” of Peoples’ Definitive Proxy Statement, which section is
incorporated herein by reference.
The Board of Directors of Peoples has adopted charters for each of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee
and the Governance and Nominating Committee.
In accordance with the requirements of Rule 5610 of The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC Corporate Governance
Requirements, the Board of Directors of Peoples has adopted a Code of Ethics covering the directors, officers and
employees of Peoples and its subsidiaries, including, without limitation, the principal executive officer, the principal
financial officer and the principal accounting officer of Peoples. Peoples intends to disclose the following events, if they
occur, in a Current Report on Form 8-K and on the “Corporate Governance & Ethics” page of Peoples’ Internet website at
www.peoplesbancorp.com within four business days following their occurrence:
(A) the date and nature of any amendment to a provision of Peoples’ Code of Ethics that
(i) applies to the principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or
controller of Peoples, or persons performing similar functions,
(ii) relates to any element of the code of ethics definition set forth in Item 406(b) of SEC Regulation S-K, and
(iii) is not a technical, administrative or other non-substantive amendment; and
(B) a description (including the nature of the waiver, the name of the person to whom the waiver was granted and the
date of the waiver) of any waiver, including an implicit waiver, from a provision of the Code of Ethics granted to
the principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller of Peoples, or
persons performing similar functions, that relates to one or more of the elements of the code of ethics definition set
forth in Item 406(b) of SEC Regulation S-K.
In addition, Peoples will disclose any waivers from the provisions of the Code of Ethics granted to a director or
executive officer of Peoples in a Current Report on Form 8-K within four business days following their occurrence.
Each of the Code of Ethics, the Audit Committee Charter, the Governance and Nominating Committee Charter and the
Compensation Committee Charter is posted on the “Corporate Governance & Ethics” page of Peoples’ Internet website.
Interested persons may also obtain copies of the Code of Ethics without charge by writing to Peoples Bancorp Inc.,
Attention: Corporate Secretary, 138 Putnam Street, P.O. Box 738, Marietta, Ohio 45750-0738.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by this Item 11 will be included in the sections captioned “COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION”, “EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION: COMPENSATION
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS”, “LONG-TERM EQUITY-BASED INCENTIVE COMPENSATION”, “SUMMARY
COMPENSATION TABLE FOR 2010”, “GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS FOR 2010”, “OUTSTANDING
EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END 2010”, “OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED FOR 2010”,
94
“PENSION BENEFITS FOR 2010”, “NON-QUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION FOR 2010” and “OTHER
POTENTIAL POST EMPLOYMENT PAYMENTS”, “DIRECTOR COMPENSATION” and “COMPENSATION
COMMITTEE REPORT” of Peoples’ Definitive Proxy Statement, which sections are incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The information required by this Item 12 regarding the security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management
will be included in the section captioned “SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT” of Peoples’ Definitive Proxy Statement, which section is incorporated herein by reference.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The table below provides information as of December 31, 2010, with respect to compensation plans under which
common shares of Peoples are authorized for issuance to directors, officers or employees in exchange for consideration in
the form of goods or services. These compensation plans include:
the Peoples Bancorp Inc. 1995 Stock Option Plan (the “1995 Plan”);
(i)
(ii) the Peoples Bancorp Inc. 1998 Stock Option Plan (the “1998 Plan”);
(iii) the Peoples Bancorp Inc. 2002 Stock Option Plan (the “2002 Plan”);
(iv) the Peoples Bancorp Inc. Amended and Restated 2006 Equity Plan (the “2006 Plan”); and
(v) the Peoples Bancorp Inc. Second Amended and Restated Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors of Peoples
Bancorp Inc. and Subsidiaries (the “Deferred Compensation Plan”).
All of these compensation plans were approved by the shareholders of Peoples.
(a)
Number of
common shares to
be issued upon
exercise of
outstanding
options, warrants
and rights
(b)
Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding
options, warrants
and rights
(c)
Number of common
shares remaining
available for future
issuance under equity
compensation plans
(excluding common
shares reflected in
column (a))
333,287(1)
$24.82(2)
404,9743)
Plan Category
Equity compensation plans approved by
shareholders
Equity compensation plans not approved
by shareholders
Total
–
333,287
(1) Includes an aggregate of 250,897 common shares issuable upon exercise of options granted under the 1995 Plan,
–
404,974
–
$24.82
the 1998 Plan and the 2002 Plan and options and stock appreciation rights granted under the 2006 Plan and 82,390
common shares allocated to participants’ bookkeeping accounts under the Deferred Compensation Plan.
(2) Represents weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options granted under the 1995 Plan, the 1998 Plan and
the 2002 Plan and options and stock appreciation rights granted under the 2006 Plan. The weighted-average
exercise price does not take into account the common shares allocated to participants’ bookkeeping accounts under
the Deferred Compensation Plan.
(3) Includes 404,974 common shares remaining available for future grants under the 2006 Plan at December 31, 2010.
No common shares were available for future grants under the 1995 Plan, the 1998 Plan and the 2002 Plan at
December 31, 2010. No amount is included for potential future allocations to participants’ bookkeeping accounts
under the Deferred Compensation Plan since the terms of the Deferred Compensation Plan do not provide for a
specified limit on the number of common shares which may be allocated to participants’ bookkeeping accounts.
Additional information regarding Peoples’ stock-based compensation plans can be found in Note 18 of the Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Since 1991, Peoples has maintained the Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors, which provides a non-employee
director of Peoples the ability to defer all or part of the compensation, and related federal income tax, received for services
95
provided as a director of Peoples or one of its subsidiaries. Since 1998, directors participating in the Deferred Compensation
Plan have been permitted to allocate their deferrals between a cash account and a stock account. The cash account earns
interest equal to Peoples Bank’s three-year certificate of deposit interest rate. The stock account receives allocations of
Peoples’ common shares on the first business day of each calendar quarter based upon amounts deferred during the previous
calendar quarter and fair market value of Peoples’ common shares and is credited with subsequent cash dividends on the
common shares previously allocated to the account. The only right a participant in the Deferred Compensation Plan for
Directors has with respect to his or her cash account and/or stock account is to receive distributions upon termination of
service as a director. Distribution of the deferred amounts is made in a lump sum or annual installments. The stock account
is distributed in common shares of Peoples or in cash and the cash account is distributed only in cash.
In addition, Peoples maintains the Peoples Bancorp Inc. Retirement Savings Plan, which is intended to meet the
qualification requirements of Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
The information required by this Item 13 will be included in the sections captioned “TRANSACTIONS WITH
RELATED PERSONS”, “PROPOSAL NUMBER 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS”, “THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
AND COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD” and “COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER
PARTICIPATION” of Peoples’ Definitive Proxy Statement, which sections are incorporated by reference.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The information required by this Item 14 will be included in the section captioned “INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM” of Peoples’ Definitive Proxy Statement, which section is incorporated herein by reference.
96
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
PART IV
(a)(1) Financial Statements:
The following consolidated financial statements of Peoples Bancorp Inc. and subsidiaries are included in Item 8:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Ernst & Young LLP) on Effectiveness of
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Ernst & Young LLP) on Consolidated
Financial Statements
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2010 and 2009
Consolidated Statements of Income for each of the three years ended December 31, 2010
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for each of the three years ended December 31, 2010
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the three years ended December 31, 2010
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Peoples Bancorp Inc. (Parent Company Only Financial Information is included in Note 19 of the
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements)
Page
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
91
(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules
All schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission are not required under the related instructions or are inapplicable and, therefore, have been omitted.
(a)(3) Exhibits
Exhibits filed with this Annual Report on Form 10-K are attached hereto or incorporated herein by reference. For a
list of such exhibits, see “Exhibit Index” beginning at page 99. The Exhibit Index specifically identifies each
management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit to this Form 10-K.
(b)
(c)
Exhibits
Exhibits filed with this Annual Report on Form 10-K are attached hereto or incorporated herein by reference. For a
list of such exhibits, see “Exhibit Index” beginning at page 99.
Financial Statement Schedules
None.
97
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Date: February 28, 2011
PEOPLES BANCORP INC.
By:
/s/ DAVID L. MEAD
David L. Mead, President and
Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following
persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signatures
/s/ DAVID L. MEAD
David L. Mead
/s/ EDWARD G. SLOANE
Edward G. Sloane
/s/ CARL L. BAKER, JR.*
Carl L. Baker, Jr.
/s/ GEORGE W. BROUGHTON*
George W. Broughton
/s/ WILFORD D. DIMIT*
Wilford D. Dimit
/s/ RICHARD FERGUSON*
Richard Ferguson
/s/ BRENDA F. JONES, M.D.*
Brenda F. Jones, M.D.
/s/ THEODORE P. SAUBER*
Theodore P. Sauber
/s/ PAUL T. THEISEN*
Paul T. Theisen
/s/ THOMAS J. WOLF*
Thomas J. Wolf
Title
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Director
Director
Director
Chairman of the Board and Director
Director
Director
Date
02/28/2011
02/28/2011
02/28/2011
02/28/2011
02/28/2011
02/28/2011
02/28/2011
02/28/2011
Vice Chairman of the Board and Director
02/28/2011
Director
02/28/2011
*
The above-named directors of the Registrant sign this Annual Report on Form 10-K by David L. Mead, their attorney-
in-fact, pursuant to Powers of Attorney signed by the above-named directors, which Powers of Attorney are filed with
this Annual Report on Form 10-K as exhibits, in the capacities indicated and on the 28th day of February, 2011.
By:
/s/DAVID L. MEAD
David L. Mead
President and Chief Executive Officer
98
Exhibit
Number
3.1(a)
3.1(b)
3.1(c)
3.1(d)
3.1(e)
3.1(f)
EXHIBIT INDEX
PEOPLES BANCORP INC. ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010
Description
Exhibit Location
Amended Articles of Incorporation of Peoples
Bancorp Inc. (as filed with the Ohio Secretary of
State on May 3, 1993).
Certificate of Amendment to the Amended Articles
of Incorporation of Peoples Bancorp Inc. (as filed
with the Ohio Secretary of State on April 22, 1994).
Certificate of Amendment to the Amended Articles
of Incorporation of Peoples Bancorp Inc. (as filed
with the Ohio Secretary of State on April 9, 1996).
Certificate of Amendment to the Amended Articles
of Incorporation of Peoples Bancorp Inc. (as filed
with the Ohio Secretary of State on April 23, 2003).
Certificate of Amendment by Shareholders or
Members to the Amended Articles of Incorporation
of Peoples Bancorp Inc. (as filed with the Ohio
Secretary of State on January 22, 2009).
Certificate of Amendment by Directors or
Incorporators to Articles filed with the Secretary of
State of the State of Ohio on January 28, 2009,
evidencing adoption of amendments by the Board of
Directors of Peoples Bancorp Inc. to Article
FOURTH of Amended Articles of Incorporation to
establish express terms of Fixed Rate Cumulative
Perpetual Preferred Shares, Series A, each without
par value, of Peoples Bancorp Inc.
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3(a) to
the Registration Statement of Peoples Bancorp Inc.
(“Peoples”) on Form 8-B filed July 20, 1993 (File
No. 0-16772).
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3(a)(2) to
Peoples’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 1997 (File No. 0-16772)
(“Peoples’ 1997 Form 10-K”).
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3(a)(3) to
Peoples’ 1997 Form 10-K.
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3(a) to
Peoples’ Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 (File No. 0-
16772)(“Peoples’ March 31, 2003 Form 10-Q”).
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to
Peoples’ Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed
on January 23, 2009 (File No. 0-16772).
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to
Peoples’ Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed
on February 2, 2009 (File No. 0-16772) (“Peoples’
February 2, 2009 Form 8-K”).
3.1(g)
Amended Articles of Incorporation of Peoples
Bancorp Inc. (reflecting amendments through
January 28, 2009) [For SEC reporting compliance
purposes only – not filed with Ohio Secretary of
State].
3.2(a)
Code of Regulations of Peoples Bancorp Inc.
3.2(b)
Certificate of Amendment to the Code of Regulations
of Peoples Bancorp Inc. regarding adoption of
amendments to Sections 1.03, 1.04, 1.05, 1.06, 1.08,
1.10, 2.03(C), 2.07, 2.08, 2.10 and 6.02 of the Code
of Regulations of Peoples Bancorp Inc. by
shareholders on April 10, 2003.
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1(g) to
Peoples’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2008 (File No. 0-16772)
(“Peoples’ 2008 Form 10-K”).
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3(b) to
Peoples’ Registration Statement on Form 8-B filed
July 20, 1993 (File No. 0-16772).
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3(c) to
Peoples’ March 31, 2003 Form 10-Q.
99
Exhibit
Number
3.2(c)
3.2(d)
3.2(e)
3.2(f)
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
Description
Certificate of Amendment to the Code of Regulations
of Peoples Bancorp Inc. regarding adoption of
amendments to Sections 3.01, 3.03, 3.04, 3.05, 3.06,
3.07, 3.08 and 3.11 of the Code of Regulations of
Peoples Bancorp Inc. by shareholders on April 8,
2004.
Certificate regarding adoption of amendments to
Sections 2.06, 2.07, 3.01 and 3.04 of Peoples
Bancorp Inc.’s Code of Regulations by the
shareholders on April 13, 2006.
Certificate regarding adoption of an amendment to
Section 2.01 of Peoples Bancorp Inc.’s Code of
Regulations by shareholders on April 22, 2010.
Code of Regulations of Peoples Bancorp Inc.
(reflecting amendments through April 22, 2010)
[For SEC reporting compliance purposes only]
Exhibit Location
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3(a) to
Peoples’ Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 (File No. 0-
16772).
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to
Peoples’ Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed
on April 14, 2006 (File No. 0-16772).
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2(e) to
Peoples’ Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2010 (File No. 0-
16772). (“Peoples’ June 30, 2010 Form 10-Q/A”)
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2(e) to
Peoples’ June 30, 2010 Form 10-Q/.
Agreement to furnish instruments and agreements
defining rights of holders of long-term debt.
Filed herewith.
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the
Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Registration
No. 333-81251) filed on June 22, 1999 by Peoples
Bancorp Inc. and PEBO Capital Trust I (“Peoples’
1999 Form S-4”).
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to
Peoples’ 1999 Form S-4.
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4 (i) to
Peoples’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 1999. (File No. 0-16772)
(“Peoples’ 1999 Form 10-K”).
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to
Peoples’ February 2, 2009 Form 8-K.
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
Peoples’ February 2, 2009 Form 8-K.
Indenture, dated as of April 20, 1999, between
Peoples Bancorp Inc. and Wilmington Trust
Company, as Debenture Trustee, relating to Junior
Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures.
Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of PEBO
Capital Trust I, dated and effective as of April 20,
1999.
Series B Capital Securities Guarantee Agreement,
dated as of September 23, 1999, between Peoples
Bancorp Inc. and Wilmington Trust Company, as
Guarantee Trustee, relating to Series B 8.62% Capital
Securities.
Warrant to purchase 313,505 Shares of Common
Stock (common shares) of Peoples Bancorp Inc.,
issued to the United States Department of the
Treasury on January 30, 2009.
Letter Agreement, dated January 30, 2009, including
Securities Purchase Agreement – Standard Terms
attached thereto as Exhibit A, between Peoples
Bancorp Inc. and the United States Department of the
Treasury [Note: Annex A to Securities Purchase
Agreement is not included therewith; filed as Exhibit
3.1 to Peoples’ February 2, 2009 Form 8-K and
incorporated by reference at Exhibit 3.1(f) of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K]
4.7
Letter Agreement, dated February 2, 2011, between
Peoples Bancorp Inc. and the United States
Department of the Treasury.
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
Peoples’ Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed
February 4, 2011 (File No. 0-16772).
100
Exhibit
Number
10.1(a)
10.1(b)
10.2(a)
10.2(b)
Description
Peoples Bancorp Inc. Second Amended and Restated
Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors of Peoples
Bancorp Inc. and Subsidiaries (Amended and
Restated Effective December 11, 2008.)*
Exhibit Location
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1(a)
to Peoples’ 2008 Form 10-K.
Rabbi Trust Agreement, made January 6, 1998,
between Peoples Bancorp Inc. and The Peoples
Banking and Trust Company (predecessor to Peoples
Bank, National Association)*
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1(c)
of Peoples’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (File No. 0-
16772) (“Peoples’ 2007 Form 10-K”).
Peoples Bancorp Inc. Amended and Restated
Incentive Award Plan (Amended and Restated
Effective December 11, 2008) [Effective for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2009]*
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of
Peoples’ 2008 Form 10-K.
Summary of Incentive Plan for Executive Officers
and other employees of Peoples Bancorp Inc.
[Effective for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2010]*
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2(b)
to Peoples’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 (File No. 0-
16772) (“Peoples’ 2009 Form 10-K”).
10.3
Peoples Bancorp Inc. 1995 Stock Option Plan.*
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4 to
Peoples’ Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed
May 24, 1995 (Registration Statement No. 033-
59569).
Form of Stock Option Agreement used in connection
with grant of non-qualified stock options to non-
employee directors of Peoples under Peoples
Bancorp Inc. 1995 Stock Option Plan.*
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(k) to
Peoples’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 1995 (File No. 0-16772)
(“Peoples’ 1995 Form 10-K”).
10.4
10.5
10.6
Form of Stock Option Agreement used in connection
with grant of non-qualified stock options to non-
employee directors of Peoples’ subsidiaries under
Peoples Bancorp Inc. 1995 Stock Option Plan.*
Form of Stock Option Agreement used in connection
with grant of incentive stock options under Peoples
Bancorp Inc. 1995 Stock Option Plan.*
10.7
Peoples Bancorp Inc. 1998 Stock Option Plan.*
10.8
10.9
Form of Stock Option Agreement used in connection
with grant of non-qualified stock options to non-
employee directors of Peoples under Peoples
Bancorp Inc. 1998 Stock Option Plan.*
Form of Stock Option Agreement used in connection
with grant of non-qualified stock options to
consultants/advisors of Peoples under Peoples
Bancorp Inc. 1998 Stock Option Plan.*
10.10
Form of Stock Option Agreement used in connection
with grant of incentive stock options under Peoples
Bancorp Inc. 1998 Stock Option Plan.*
*Management Compensation Plan
101
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(l) to
Peoples’ 1995 Form 10-K.
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(m) to
Peoples’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 1998 (File No. 0-16772)
(“Peoples’ 1998 Form 10-K”).
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10 to
Peoples’ Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed
September 4, 1998 (Registration Statement No. 333-
62935).
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(o) to
Peoples’ 1998 Form 10-K.
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(p) to
Peoples’ 1998 Form 10-K.
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(o) to
Peoples’ 1999 Form 10-K.
Exhibit
Number
10.11
10.12
10.13
10.14
10.15
10.16
10.17
10.18
10.19
10.20
10.21
10.22
10.23
Description
Exhibit Location
Peoples Bancorp Inc. 2002 Stock Option Plan.*
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10 to
Peoples’ Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed
April 15, 2002 (Registration Statement No. 333-
86246).
Form of Stock Option Agreement used in connection
with grant of non-qualified stock options to non-
employee directors of Peoples under Peoples
Bancorp Inc. 2002 Stock Option Plan.*
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(r) to
Peoples’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2002 (File No. 0-16772)
(“Peoples’ 2002 Form 10-K”).
Form of Stock Option Agreement used in connection
with grant of non-qualified stock options to directors
of Peoples’ subsidiaries under Peoples Bancorp Inc.
2002 Stock Option Plan.*
Form of Stock Option Agreement used in connection
with grant of non-qualified stock options to
employees of Peoples under Peoples Bancorp Inc.
2002 Stock Option Plan.*
Form of Stock Option Agreement used in connection
with grant of incentive stock options under Peoples
Bancorp Inc. 2002 Stock Option Plan.*
Amended and Restated Change in Control
Agreement between Peoples Bancorp Inc. and Carol
A. Schneeberger (amended and restated effective
December 11, 2008)*
Amended and Restated Change in Control
Agreement between Peoples Bancorp Inc. and Joseph
S. Yazombek (amended and restated effective
December 11, 2008)*
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(s) to
Peoples’ 2002 Form 10-K.
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(t) to
Peoples’ 2002 Form 10-K.
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(u) to
Peoples’ 2002 Form 10-K.
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to
Peoples’ 2008 Form 10-K.
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to
Peoples’ 2008 Form 10-K.
Summary of Perquisites for Executive Officers of
Peoples Bancorp Inc.*
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to
Peoples’ 2009 Form 10-K.
Summary of Base Salaries for Executive Officers of
Peoples Bancorp Inc.*
Filed herewith.
Summary of Cash Compensation for Directors of
Peoples Bancorp Inc.
Filed herewith.
Peoples Bancorp Inc. Amended and Restated 2006
Equity Plan*
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to
Peoples’ 2008 Form 10-K.
Form of Peoples Bancorp Inc. 2006 Equity Plan
Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement used and to be
used to evidence grant of nonqualified stock option
to non-employee directors of Peoples Bancorp Inc.*
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(c) of
Peoples’ Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 (File No. 0-
16772).
Form of Peoples Bancorp Inc. 2006 Equity Plan
Restricted Stock Agreement for employees used and
to be used to evidence awards of restricted stock
granted to employees of Peoples Bancorp Inc.*
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.29 of
Peoples’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2006 (File No. 0-16722)
(“Peoples’ 2006 Form 10-K”).
*Management Compensation Plan
102
Exhibit
Number
10.24
Description
Form of Peoples Bancorp Inc. 2006 Equity Plan
Restricted Stock Agreement for non-employee
directors used and to be used to evidence awards of
restricted stock granted to directors of Peoples
Bancorp Inc.*
10.25
Form of Peoples Bancorp Inc. 2006 Equity Plan SAR
Agreement for employees used and to be used to
evidence awards of stock appreciation rights granted
to employees of Peoples Bancorp Inc.
Exhibit Location
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.30 of
Peoples’ 2006 Form 10-K.
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.31 of
Peoples’ 2006 Form 10-K.
10.26(a)
Letter Agreement, dated July 22, 2009, between
Peoples Bancorp Inc. and Edward G. Sloane.*
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to
Peoples’ June 30, 2009 Form 10-Q.
10.26(b)
Letter Agreement, dated July 22, 2009, between
Peoples Bancorp Inc. and Carol A. Schneeberger.*
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to
Peoples’ June 30, 2009 Form 10-Q.
10.26(c)
Letter Agreement, dated July 22, 2009, between
Peoples Bancorp Inc. and Joseph S. Yazombek.*
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to
Peoples’ June 30, 2009 Form 10-Q.
10.27
10.28
10.29
10.30
10.31
10.32
10.33
Amended and Restated Change in Control
Agreement between Peoples Bancorp Inc. and
Edward G. Sloane (amended and restated effective
December 11, 2008)*
Change in Control Agreement between Peoples
Bancorp Inc. and Daniel K. McGill (adopted
September 14, 2009)*
Change in Control Agreement between Peoples
Bancorp Inc. and Richard W. Stafford (adopted
February 8, 2010)*
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to
Peoples’ 2008 Form 10-K.
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
Peoples’ Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended September 30, 2009 (File No.
0-16722).
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to
Peoples’ 2009 Form 10-K.
Letter Agreement, dated March 1, 2010, between
Peoples Bancorp Inc. and Daniel K McGill*
Letter Agreement, dated January 18, 2011, between
Peoples Bancorp Inc. and Richard W. Stafford.*
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.32 to
Peoples’ 2009 Form 10-K.
Filed herewith.
Letter Agreement, dated January 18, 2011, between
Peoples Bancorp Inc. and David L. Mead.*
Filed herewith.
Change in Control Agreement between Peoples
Bancorp Inc. and Michael W. Hager (adopted
January 27, 2011).*
Filed herewith.
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
Peoples’ Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed
February 2, 2011 (File No. 0-16722)(“Peoples’
February 2, 2011 Form 8-K”).
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to
Peoples’ February 2, 2011 Form 8-K.
10.34
Peoples Bancorp Inc. 2011 Management Transition
Bonus Plan.*
10.35
Form of Award Agreement to evidence participation
in the Peoples Bancorp Inc. 2011 Management
Transition Bonus Plan by each of Michael W. Hager,
Daniel K. McGill, Carol A. Schneeberger and
Edward G. Sloane.*
*Management Compensation Plan
103
Exhibit
Number
10.36
12
21
23
24
31(a)
31(b)
32
99.1
99.2
Description
Exhibit Location
Form of Restricted Stock Award to evidence the
award of restricted common shares to Richard W.
Stafford under the Peoples Bancorp Inc. 2011
Management Transition Bonus Plan.*
Statements of Computation of Ratios.
Subsidiaries of Peoples Bancorp Inc.
Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm - Ernst & Young LLP.
Powers of Attorney of Directors and Executive
Officers of Peoples Bancorp Inc.
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications [President
and Chief Executive Officer]
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications [Executive
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer]
Certifications Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63
of Title 18 of the United States Code [President and
Chief Executive Officer; and Executive Vice
President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer]
Certification Pursuant to Section 111(B)(4)
of the Emergency Economic Stabilization
Act of 2008 and 31 CFR § 30.15[President and Chief
Executive Officer]
Certification Pursuant to Section 111(B)(4)
of the Emergency Economic Stabilization
Act of 2008 and 31 CFR § 30.15 [Executive Vice
President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer]
Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to
Peoples’ February 2, 2011 Form 8-K.
Filed herewith.
Filed herewith.
Filed herewith.
Filed herewith.
Filed herewith.
Filed herewith.
Filed herewith.
Filed herewith.
Filed herewith.
*Management Compensation Plan
104
Peoples Bancorp is a company
built on the promise of helping people.
Market Makers in Peoples Bancorp Inc. Stock
Wedbush securities inc.
(213) 688-8000
deutsche Bank securities inc.
(212) 250-2500
Barclays Capital inc.
(212) 412-4000
sandler o’neill & Partners
(800) 635-6860
howe Barnes hoefer & arnett
(800) 621-2364
morgan stanley & Co., inc.
(800) 223-6559
merrill lynch
(800) 937-0516
keefe Bruyette and Woods, inc.
(800) 342-5529
Goldman sachs
(800) 221-8320
Citigroup Global markets inc.
(800) 223-7743
sweney Cartwright & Co.
(800) 334-7481
rBC Capital markets
(800) 285-4964
knight equity markets, l.P.
(800) 222-4910
uBs securities, llC
(800) 421-6172
Stockholder Information
stoCk listinG
nasdaQ symbol: PeBo
nasdaQ Global select market, CusiP 709789101
alternate newspaper listings: PeBooh and PeBcoh
CorPorate offiCes
Peoples’ headquarters:
138 Putnam street, Po Box 738
marietta, oh 45750-0738
investor relations phone number: (740) 374-6136
www.peoplesbancorp.com
stoCk transfer aGent, reGistrar
shareowner services
161 n. Concord exchange
south st. Paul, mn 55075
(800) 468-9716
www.shareowneronline.com
General shareholder inQuiries
Peoples Bancorp inc.
attn: investor relations
138 Putnam street, Po Box 738
marietta, oh 45750-0738
11
138 Putnam Street · PO Box 738 · Marietta, Ohio 45750-0738
(800) 374-6123 · www.peoplesbancorp.com