Piper Jaffray Companies Annual Report 2006

Plain-text annual report

2006 Annual Report Piper Jaffray Companies Sector Expertise · Product Depth · Geographic Reach o u r g u i d i n g p r i n c i p l e s We create and implement superior ﬁnancial solutions for our clients. Serving clients is our fundamental purpose. • We earn our clients’ trust by delivering the best guidance and service. • Great people are our competitive advantage. • As we serve, we are committed to these core values: Always place our clients’ interests ﬁrst. Conduct ourselves with integrity and treat others with respect. Work in partnership with our clients and each other. Maintain a high-quality environment that attracts, retains and develops the best people. Contribute our talents and resources to serve the communities in which we live and work. Andrew S. Duff – Chairman and Chief Executive Ofﬁcer To our shareholders, FOCUS. It is integral to our strategy and to our ongoing success. In 2006, we set a new strategy for the ﬁrm, and we are conﬁdent this focused plan will create exceptional solutions for our clients and long-term value for our shareholders. FOCUS ON 2006: A Redeﬁning Year During the year, we aligned the entire ﬁrm toward growing our capital markets business. To facilitate this strategy, we sold our Private Client Services branch network—the result of a thorough and disciplined analysis of our strengths and growth opportunities. Our mission is to build the leading international middle market investment bank and institutional securities ﬁrm. Proceeds from the sale have provided the means to recapitalize our company, as well as to invest further in our business. 1 FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS Years ended December 31 (Amounts in thousands) Revenues Investment banking Institutional brokerage Interest Other income Total revenues Interest expense Net revenues Non-Interest expenses Compensation and beneﬁts Cash award program Restructuring-related expense Other non-compensation expense Total non-interest expenses Income from continuing operations before income tax expense Income tax expense Net income from continuing operations Discontinued operations: 2006 $ 294,808 162,406 63,969 14,054 535,237 32,303 502,934 291,265 2,980 - 110,816 405,061 97,873 34,974 62,899 2005 243,347 162,068 44,857 3,530 453,802 32,494 421,308 243,833 4,205 8,595 128,644 385,277 36,031 10,863 25,168 2004 227,667 179,604 35,718 13,638 456,627 22,421 434,206 251,187 4,717 - 129,264 385,168 49,038 16,727 32,311 Income from discontinued operations, net of tax 172,354 14,915 18,037 Net income $ 235,253 $40,083 $50,348 *All from continuing operations. #2006 net income, pretax operating margin and earnings per common share included a beneﬁt of $13.1 million, 420 basis points and $0.69, respectively, due to a reduction of litigation reserves related to a development in a particular industry-wide litigation matter. 2 $3.32$1.32$1.6719.5%8.6%11.3%$63$25$32$503$421$434‘06‘05‘04‘06‘05‘04‘06‘05‘04‘06‘05‘04Net revenues*In millionsNet income*#In millionsPretax operating margin*#Earnings per common share*#DilutedOur sharpened focus has already translated into results. In 2006, our net revenues from continuing operations were up 19 percent. The combination of strong revenues, disciplined expense management and our recapitalization actions drove an improvement in 2006 pretax operating margin from continuing operations. In 2006, our investment banking services continued to gain momentum. We were the most active underwriter of growth companies (less than $1 billion in market value) for IPOs, follow-ons and convertibles. We were also at the forefront in the emerging alternative energy/clean technology sector, where we managed more public equity offerings than any other investment bank. Our public ﬁnance team completed 452 issues with a total par value of $6.6 billion, representing a 9 percent increase over 2005 par value. Going forward, we will grow our business by focusing on three speciﬁc initiatives: deepening expertise in select sectors, broadening our product offerings to serve Jon W. Salveson–Head of Investment Banking clients’ full business lifecycle needs, and extending our geographic reach to serve clients in an increasingly international market. Capital Markets Leadership* Since 1/1/04 No. 1: Consumer Equity Underwriter Piper Jaffray – 45 transactions No. 1: Health Care Underwriter: Issuers < $2 billion in market value Piper Jaffray – 82 transactions No. 1: Technology IPO Underwriter Piper Jaffray – 41 transactions *Source: Dealogic FOCUS ON SECTORS Our concentration on targeted sectors reﬂects our disciplined approach to developing deep expertise in competitive, fast-changing and high-growth industries. By building sector expertise in our investment banking, sales and trading, and research teams, we are better positioned to address the unique industry-speciﬁc needs of clients operating and investing in these sectors. Our research and transaction rankings in areas such as health care, consumer, technology, and state and local government, exemplify our ability to succeed where we focus. To build on that strength, we added new sectors to our roster in 2006, developing expertise in targeted areas with the same commitment as in our established sectors. These new sectors, plus continued investment in our established areas, provide a strong growth platform for our capital markets business. 3 Sector Expertise · Aircraft Finance · Alternative Energy · Business Services · Consumer · Education · Financial Institutions · Health Care · Hospitality · Real Estate · Industrial Growth · State and Local Government · Technology Among our new targeted sectors is alternative energy—a high-growth and high- proﬁle industry where we see signiﬁcant long-term potential. Hospitality ﬁnance is also a recent addition where we structure and underwrite tax-exempt hotel and covention center ﬁnancings for our clients. 2006 Fixed Income Rankings* No. 4 for new long-term municipal issues No. 4 for senior manager of health care/hospital issues No. 1 municipal underwriter in Midwest *Source: Thomson Financial Frank E. Fairman–Head of Public Finance Services Our expertise in the hospitality sector was instrumental in helping our client, Austin Convention Enterprises Inc., achieve signiﬁcant savings—approximately $90 million in present value—when restructuring its existing $260 million debt portfolio in 2006. Austin Convention Enterprises Inc. owns the Austin Convention Center, an 800-room upscale hotel adjacent to the convention center in downtown Austin, Texas. Piper Jaffray originally served as sole underwriter on the corporation’s initial $245 million ﬁnancing in 2001. Since then, we worked closely with the client to determine the appropriate timing for a debt restructuring—basing the move on the strong performance of the hotel and convention center, current interest rates, and the willingness of the 2001 subordinate bond insurer to participate in the transaction. The December 2006 bond restructuring included both ﬁrst- and second-tier revenue refunding bonds. The resulting economic beneﬁt for Austin Convention Enterprises, Inc. illustrates the value that can be created by linking deep client knowledge with sector insights. 4 Product Depth · Investment banking · Mergers and acquisitions · Equity and debt capital markets · High-yield and structured products · Institutional equity sales and trading · Tax-exempt and taxable sales and trading · Investment research In 2006, our product breadth beneﬁted our client, American Medical Systems (AMS), when it acquired Laserscope, a developer of medical lasers for the urology and aesthetics markets. In this transaction, we served as the exclusive M&A advisor to AMS and capitalized on our strategic alliance with CIT Group, providing $600 million of senior debt. In addition, our debt capital markets group led and syndicated a $180 million subordinated bridge facility. Between the announcement and closing of the transaction, our convertibles team executed a $375 million convertible debt issue. Finally, we advised AMS on the successful divestiture of the laser aesthetics assets of Laserscope. Our work as a primary advisor to AMS demonstrates the value we can bring to clients by combining deep expertise and product capabilities. 5 Thomas P. Schnettler –Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Ofﬁcer FOCUS ON PRODUCTS In 2006, we added several new products to our mix, further enhancing our ability to offer the right solutions to clients as they move through various business lifecycles, ﬁnancing situations and market conditions. To enhance our credit capability, we established a strategic alliance with CIT Group Inc. This alliance offers middle market companies a comprehensive set of ﬁnancing solutions, including senior-secured and unsecured debt, second-lien facilities, subordinated ﬁnancings and mezzanine loans. We also added a ﬁnancial restructuring team to advise ﬁnancially stressed and distressed companies. This team strengthens our product platform by offering solutions clients may need during non-growth cycles. A more comprehensive product mix also helps us by diversifying our revenue streams for different types of market conditions. Geographic Reach · Piper Jaffray has ofﬁces in 20 principal U.S. locations, the United Kingdom and China. See the listing on page 8. To advise clients effectively on a global scale, we must be able to do business wherever our clients access and invest capital and provide a proprietary perspective on international markets. Since 2001, our consumer research team has been administering multi-city tours of U.S. and Canadian shopping malls and retail outlets, conducting proprietary research on teen spending habits and retail brand perceptions. In 2006, the team expanded its research with tours of retail operations in Spain and Italy, providing corporate and institutional clients with an international perspective on the retail market not available elsewhere. This type of industry-leading international research provides our clients unparalleled and proprietary analysis and has served as a catalyst for our organic growth in the consumer sector both in the United States and Europe. U.K. Biotech Leadership* Piper Jaffray Ltd. lead managed follow-on transactions that accounted for 81 percent of the equity raised for biotechnology companies in the U.K. in 2006. *Source: Piper Jaffray Ltd. FOCUS ON GEOGRAPHY We are experiencing increased international opportunity for our expertise and products, and we plan to meet this demand through disciplined expansion in targeted international markets where our clients access and invest capital. Our international growth gained signiﬁcant momentum in 2006, with major milestones in both Europe and Asia. In our London- based subsidiary, Piper Jaffray Ltd., we doubled the size of our investment banking group and added consumer and technology capabilities to complement our industry- leading expertise in health care. We opened an ofﬁce in Shanghai to provide international investment banking and research services in Asia. Our investment banking practice in China has already established a track record for successfully taking Chinese technology companies public in the U.S. markets. We intend to build on this foundation in China by extending our expertise into additional products and sectors. James L. Chosy – General Counsel and Secretary 6 FOCUS ON GUIDING PRINCIPLES Throughout 2006, we maintained a steady focus on our Guiding Principles, reinforcing our commitment to our core values amid the signiﬁcant strategic change. We will succeed by always placing our clients’ interests ﬁrst and creating an environment and business platform that enable us to attract and retain the best employees. As a ﬁrm and as individual leaders, we contribute our talents and resources to build and to serve our communities. Annually, the ﬁrm donates 5 percent of pretax earnings through a combination of cash contributions, in-kind contributions and volunteer hours. Thank you to our clients for placing your trust in us, to our shareholders for supporting our vision, and to our employees for your commitment to our future. Together—and with focus—we will grow our capital markets business and build the leading international middle market investment bank and institutional securities ﬁrm. Sincerely, Andrew S. Duff Chairman and Chief Executive Ofﬁcer Piper Jaffray Companies 7 Executive Leadership Andrew S. Duff Chairman and Chief Executive Ofﬁcer Thomas P. Schnettler Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Ofﬁcer Jon W. Salveson Head of Investment Banking Robert W. Peterson Head of Equities Benjamin T. May Head of High-Yield and Structured Products Frank E. Fairman Head of Public Finance Services James L. Chosy General Counsel and Secretary R. Todd Firebaugh Chief Administrative Ofﬁcer Board of Directors Andrew S. Duff Chairman and Chief Executive Ofﬁcer Piper Jaffray Companies Addison (Tad) L. Piper Retired Former Chairman and Chief Executive Ofﬁcer Piper Jaffray Companies Inc. Michael R. Francis Executive Vice President of Marketing Target Corporation B. Kristine Johnson President Afﬁnity Capital Management Samuel L. Kaplan Partner and Founding Member Kaplan, Strangis and Kaplan, P.A. Frank L. Sims Corporate Vice President Transportation and Product Assurance Cargill, Inc. Jean M. Taylor President and Chief Executive Ofﬁcer Taylor Corporation 8 Principal Ofﬁce Locations Minneapolis, MN (headquarters) Austin, TX Boston, MA Charlotte, NC Chicago, IL Denver, CO Des Moines, IA Houston, TX Kansas City, KS Los Angeles, CA Milwaukee, WI Nashville, TN New York, NY Palo Alto, CA Phoenix, AZ Portland, OR Sacramento, CA San Francisco, CA Seattle, WA St. Louis, MO London, United Kingdom Shanghai, China Piper Jaffray Companies SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA The following table presents our selected consolidated financial data for the periods and dates indicated. The information set forth below should be read in conjunc- tion with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, (Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data) Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and statements and notes our consolidated financial thereto. 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Revenues: Investment banking Institutional brokerage Interest Other income Total revenues Interest expense Net revenues Non-interest expenses: Compensation and benefits Cash award program Regulatory settlement Merger and restructuring Royalty fee Other Total non-interest expenses Income/(loss) from continuing operations before income tax expense/(benefit) Income tax expense/(benefit) Net income/(loss) from continuing operations Discontinued operations: Income from discontinued operations, net of tax Net income Earnings per basic common share Income/(loss) from continuing operations Income from discontinued operations Earnings per basic common share Earnings per diluted common share Income/(loss) from continuing operations Income from discontinued operations Earnings per diluted common share Weighted average number of common shares Basic Diluted Other data Total assets Long-term debt Shareholders’ equity Total employees $ 294,808 162,406 63,969 14,054 $ 243,347 162,068 44,857 3,530 $ 227,667 179,604 35,718 13,638 $ 197,966 209,230 27,978 10,327 $ 181,516 171,231 37,119 4,929 535,237 32,303 502,934 291,265 2,980 – – – 110,816 405,061 97,873 34,974 62,899 172,354 $ 235,253 $ $ $ $ 3.49 9.57 13.07 3.32 9.09 12.40 18,002 18,968 453,802 32,494 456,627 22,421 445,501 16,476 394,795 28,487 421,308 434,206 429,025 366,308 243,833 4,205 – 8,595 – 128,644 251,187 4,717 – – – 129,264 246,868 24,000 – – 3,911 123,411 205,925 – 32,500 7,976 7,482 123,370 385,277 385,168 398,190 377,253 36,031 10,863 25,168 49,038 16,727 32,311 30,835 10,176 20,659 (10,945) (2,392) (8,553) 14,915 18,037 5,340 8,659 $ 40,083 $ 50,348 $ 25,999 $ 106 $ $ $ $ 1.34 0.79 2.13 1.32 0.78 2.10 $ $ $ $ 1.67 0.93 2.60 1.67 0.93 2.60 $ $ $ $ 1.07 0.28 1.35 1.07 0.28 1.35 $ $ $ $ (0.45) 0.45 0.01 (0.45) 0.45 0.01 18,813 19,081 19,333 19,399 19,237 19,237 19,160 19,160 $1,851,847 $ – $ 924,439 1,108 $2,354,191 $ 180,000 $ 754,827 2,871 $2,828,257 $ 180,000 $ 725,428 3,027 $2,380,647 $ 180,000 $ 669,795 2,991 $2,032,452 $ 215,000 $ 609,857 3,227 Piper Jaffray Annual Report 2006 9 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The following information should be read in conjunc- tion with the accompanying consolidated financial statements and related notes and exhibits included elsewhere in this report. Certain statements in this report may be considered forward-looking. Statements that are not historical or current facts, including state- ments about beliefs and expectations, are forward- looking statements. These forward looking statements include, among other things, statements other than historical information or statements of current condi- tion and may relate to our future plans and objectives and results, and also may include our belief regarding the effect of various legal proceedings, as set forth under “Legal Proceedings” in Part I, Item 3 of this Form 10-K. Forward-looking statements involve inher- ent risks and uncertainties, and important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated, including those factors discussed below under “External Factors Impacting Our Business” as well as the factors identified under “Risk Factors” in Part 1, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, as updated in our subsequent reports filed with the SEC. These reports are available at our Web site at www.piperjaffray.com and at the SEC Web site at www.sec.gov. Forward- looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we undertake no obligation to update them in light of new information or future events. Executive Overview Our continuing operations are principally engaged in providing investment banking, institutional brokerage and related financial services to middle-market corpo- rations, private equity groups, public entities, non- profit entities and institutional investors in the United States, Europe and Asia. Our revenues are generated primarily through the receipt of advisory and financing fees earned on investment banking activities, commis- sions and sales credits earned on equity and fixed income institutional sales and trading activities, net interest earned on securities inventories and profits and losses from trading activities related to these secu- rities inventories. The securities business is a human capital business; accordingly, compensation and benefits comprise the largest component of our expenses, and our perfor- mance is dependent upon our ability to attract, develop and retain highly skilled employees who are motivated and committed to provide the highest quality of service and guidance to our clients. Our discontinued operations include the operating results of our Private Client Services (“PCS”) retail brokerage business, the gain on the sale of the PCS branch network and related restructuring and transac- tion costs. We closed on the sale of our PCS branch network and certain related assets to UBS Financial Services, Inc., a subsidiary of UBS AG (“UBS”), on August 11, 2006. Our PCS retail brokerage business provided financial advice and a wide range of financial products and services to individual investors through a network of approximately 90 branch offices. We received $500 million for the sale of the branch net- work and approximately $250 million for the net assets of the branch network, consisting principally of cus- tomer margin receivables. The sale resulted in after-tax proceeds of approximately $510 million and an after- tax book gain for the year ended December 31, 2006 of $165.6 million, net of restructuring and transaction charges. We expect to incur additional restructuring costs in the first and second quarters of 2007 related to a system conversion, resulting from the sale of the PCS branch network. Our divestiture of the PCS branch network had a material impact on our results of operations and finan- cial condition. The majority of our customer receiv- ables and payables were eliminated, stock loan liabilities that helped finance customer receivables were repaid, we wrote-off goodwill related to the PCS busi- ness of $85.6 million, and we significantly changed our capitalization structure by repaying $180 million in subordinated debt and repurchasing approximately 1.6 million common shares through an accelerated share repurchase in the amount of $100 million. In addition, certain equity awards held by PCS employees were forfeited upon the employees’ transfer to UBS, and certain equity awards held by severed employees were vested on an accelerated basis. As discussed above, the results of our PCS business operations, the gain on the sale of our PCS branch network and the related restructuring and transaction costs have been classified within discontinued operations with prior period PCS results of operations reclassified to discontinued operations for a comparable presenta- tion. See Notes 4 and 16 to our consolidated financial statements for a further discussion of our discontinued operations and restructuring. 10 Piper Jaffray Annual Report 2006 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations As part of our growth strategy, we have increased the number of business sectors and industries in which we specialize, enhanced our product offerings and expanded the geographic reach of our services to better our customers. Within the corporate sector we have traditionally operated in the health care, technology, financial institutions, consumer and aircraft finance sectors. In 2006, we expanded into the alternative energy, business services and industrial growth sectors to serve our corporate clients. In addition, we have expanded our fixed income financing capabilities to provide services to the hospitality and commercial real estate industries. In the third quarter of 2006, as part of our efforts to enhance our product offerings, we announced a strategic relationship with CIT Group, Inc. (“CIT”) to offer middle-market companies a com- prehensive set of financing solutions. Additionally, in 2006, we expanded our high-yield and structured prod- ucts capability and added a corporate financial restruc- turing team to assist distressed corporations. We strengthened our international presence in 2006 by significantly increasing the size of the team in our London office and opening an office in Shanghai. We plan to continue our focus on the growth of our existing capital markets businesses through sector expertise, product depth and geographic reach. In addi- tion, as opportunities arise we intend to use our capital to a greater extent to facilitate customer activity and engaging in principal activities that leverage our exper- tise. Our principal activities will result in greater com- mitments of capital on our own behalf, and may MARKET DATA The following table provides a summary of relevant market data over the past three years. include, among other things, proprietary positions in equity or debt securities of public and private compa- nies. Our growth initiatives will require investments in personnel and other expenses, which may have a short- term negative impact on our profitability as it may take time to develop meaningful revenues from the growth initiatives. We also may pursue new businesses that support our strategic priorities. RESULTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006 Our full year performance reflects revenue growth and improved profitability. For the year ended Decem- ber 31, 2006, our net income, including continuing and discontinued operations, was $235.3 million, or $12.40 per diluted share, up from net income of $40.1 million, or $2.10 per diluted share, for the prior year. Net income in 2006 included $165.6 million, after tax and net of restructuring and transaction costs, related to the gain on the sale of the PCS branch network and certain related assets to UBS. For 2006, totaled net $62.9 million, or $3.32 per diluted share, up from net income of $25.2 million, or $1.32 per diluted share, in 2005. Net income from continuing operations in 2006 included a benefit of $0.69 per diluted share, resulting from a reduction of a litigation reserve related to developments in a specific industry-wide litigation matter. Net revenues from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2006 were $502.9 mil- lion, up 19.4 percent from $421.3 million in the prior year. from continuing operations income YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006 2005 2004 Dow Jones Industrials a NASDAQ a NYSE Average Daily Value Traded ($ BILLIONS) NASDAQ Average Daily Value Traded ($ BILLIONS) Mergers and Acquisitions (NUMBER OF TRANSACTIONS) b Public Equity Offerings (NUMBER OF TRANSACTIONS) c e Initial Public Offerings (NUMBER OF TRANSACTIONS) c Managed Municipal Underwritings (NUMBER OF TRANSACTIONS) d Managed Municipal Underwritings (VALUE OF TRANSACTIONS IN BILLIONS) d 10-Year Treasuries Average Rate 3-Month Treasuries Average Rate (a) Data provided is at period end. (b) Source: Securities Data Corporation. (c) Source: Dealogic (offerings with reported market value greater than $20 million). (d) Source: Thomson Financial. (e) Number of transactions includes convertible offerings. 12,463 2,415 $ 68.3 $ 46.5 10,685 857 165 12,553 $ 383.8 4.79% 4.73% 2006 v 2005 2005 v 2004 16.3% (0.6)% 10,718 2,205 $ 56.1 $ 39.5 8,818 775 170 10,783 2,175 $ 46.1 $ 34.6 8,188 1,005 214 9.5 21.7 17.7 21.2 10.6 (2.9) 13,948 13,605 (10.0) $ 408.3 4.29% 3.15% $ 359.7 (6.0) 4.27% 11.7 1.37% 50.2 129.9 1.4 21.7 14.2 7.7 (22.9) (20.6) 2.5 13.5 0.5 Piper Jaffray Annual Report 2006 11 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations EXTERNAL FACTORS IMPACTING OUR BUSINESS Performance in the financial services industry in which we operate is highly correlated to the overall strength of economic conditions and financial market activity. Overall market conditions are a product of many fac- tors, which are mostly unpredictable and beyond our control. These factors may affect the financial decisions made by investors, including their level of participation in the financial markets. In turn, these decisions may affect our business results. With respect to financial market activity, our profitability is sensitive to a variety of factors, including the volume and value of trading in securities, the volatility of the equity and fixed income markets, the level and shape of various yield curves, and the demand for investment banking services as reflected by the number and size of equity and debt financings and merger and acquisition transactions. Factors that differentiate our business within the finan- cial services industry also may affect our financial results. For example, our business focuses primarily on middle market companies in specific industry sec- tors. These sectors may experience growth or down- turns independently of general economic and market conditions, or may face market conditions that are disproportionately better or worse than those impact- ing the economy and markets generally. In either case, our business could be affected differently than overall market trends. Given the variability of the capital mar- kets and securities businesses, our earnings may fluc- tuate significantly from period to period, and results of any individual period should not be considered indic- ative of future results. 12 Piper Jaffray Annual Report 2006 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Results of Operations FINANCIAL SUMMARY The following table provides a summary of the results of our operations and the results of our operations as a percentage of net revenues for the periods indicated. FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, (Dollars in thousands) Revenues: Investment banking Institutional brokerage Interest Other income Total revenues Interest expense Net revenues Non-interest expenses: Compensation and benefits Occupancy and equipment Communications Floor brokerage and clearance Marketing and business development Outside services Cash award program Restructuring-related expense Other operating expenses Income from continuing operations before income tax expense Income tax expense Net income from continuing operations Discontinued operations: Income from discontinued operations, net of tax Net income N/M — Not Meaningful 2006 2005 2004 2006 v 2005 2005 v 2004 2006 2005 2004 AS A PERCENTAGE OF NET REVENUES FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, $294,808 162,406 63,969 14,054 535,237 32,303 502,934 $243,347 $227,667 21.1% 6.9% 162,068 179,604 44,857 3,530 35,718 13,638 453,802 456,627 32,494 22,421 0.2 42.6 298.1 17.9 (0.6) (9.8) 25.6 (74.1) (0.6) 44.9 421,308 434,206 19.4 (3.0) 58.6% 57.8% 52.4% 32.3 38.5 41.4 12.7 2.8 106.4 6.4 100.0 10.6 0.8 8.2 3.2 107.7 105.2 7.7 5.2 100.0 100.0 291,265 243,833 251,187 30,660 23,189 13,292 24,731 28,053 2,980 – (9,109) 30,808 23,987 14,785 21,537 23,881 4,205 8,595 13,646 28,581 24,757 14,017 24,660 20,378 4,717 – 19.5 (0.5) (3.3) (10.1) 14.8 17.5 (29.1) N/M (2.9) 7.8 (3.1) 5.5 (12.7) 17.2 (10.9) N/M 16,871 N/M (19.1) 97,873 34,974 62,899 36,031 10,863 49,038 16,727 171.6 222.0 (26.5) (35.1) 25,168 32,311 149.9 (22.1) 57.9 57.9 57.8 6.1 4.6 2.6 4.9 5.6 0.6 – (1.8) 80.5 19.5 7.0 12.5 7.3 5.7 3.5 5.1 5.7 1.0 2.0 3.2 6.6 5.7 3.2 5.7 4.7 1.1 – 3.9 91.4 88.7 8.6 2.6 6.0 11.3 3.9 7.4 172,354 $235,253 14,915 18,037 1055.6 (17.3) 34.3 3.5 4.2 $ 40,083 $ 50,348 486.9% (20.4)% 46.8% 9.5% 11.6% Total non-interest expenses 405,061 385,277 385,168 5.1 0.0 For the year ended December 31, 2006, net income, including continuing and discontinued operations, totaled $235.3 million, which included a gain of $165.6 million, after-tax and net of restructuring and transaction costs, from the sale of our PCS branch network. Net revenues from continuing operations increased to $502.9 million for 2006, an increase of 19.4 percent from the prior year. In 2006, investment banking revenues increased 21.1 percent to $294.8 mil- lion, compared with revenues of $243.3 million in the prior year. This increase was primarily attributable to higher equity financing activity. Institutional brokerage revenues remained essentially flat when compared with the prior-year period. In 2006, net interest income increased to $31.7 million, compared with $12.4 million in 2005. The increase was driven by two primary factors. First, in the third quarter of 2006, we repaid $180 million in subordinated debt and paid down other short-term financing with proceeds from the sale of the PCS branch network, which reduced interest expense. Second, dur- ing the third and fourth quarters of 2006, we invested the excess proceeds from the sale in short-term interest Piper Jaffray Annual Report 2006 13 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations bearing instruments, which generated interest income. In 2006, other income increased to $14.1 million, com- pared with $3.5 million in 2005, primarily due to a $9.9 million gain related to our ownership of two seats on the New York Stock Exchange, which were exchanged for cash and restricted shares of common stock of the NYSE Group, Inc. We sold approximately 65 percent of our NYSE Group, Inc. restricted shares in a secondary offering during the second quarter of 2006. Non-interest expenses increased to $405.1 million in 2006, from $385.3 million in 2005. This increase was attributable to increased variable compensation and benefits expenses due to higher profitability, offset in part by a reduction in litigation reserves related to devel- opments in a specific industry-wide litigation matter and an $8.6 million restructuring charge taken in 2005. including continuing and discontinued Net income, operations, was $40.1 million for the year ended Decem- ber 31, 2005, down from $50.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2004. In 2005, net revenues from continuing operations were $421.3 million, a decline of 3.0 percent from the prior year. In 2005, investment banking revenues increased to $243.3 million compared with $227.7 million in 2004, driven by higher advisory services activity associated with merger and acquisition transactions. Institutional brokerage revenues decreased 9.8 percent from 2004 due primarily to significant declines in fixed income volumes, lower spreads on fixed income products due to the NASD’s Trade Reporting and Compliance Engine (“TRACE”) requirements and reduced equity sales and trading revenues. In 2005, other income decreased to $3.5 million, compared with $13.6 million in 2004. This decrease was due to higher gains recorded on private equity investments in 2004. Also, 2004 included revenues associated with our ven- ture capital business, the management of which was transitioned to an independent company effective December 31, 2004. Non-interest expenses were $385.3 million in 2005, flat compared to 2004. Com- pensation and benefits expenses declined due to lower revenues and profitability. Non-compensation expenses increased due to an $8.6 million restructuring charge taken in the second quarter of 2005 in connection with certain expense reduction measures. CONSOLIDATED NON-INTEREST EXPENSES Compensation and Benefits – Compensation and benefits expenses, which are the largest component of our expenses, include salaries, commissions, bonuses, ben- efits, employment taxes and other employee costs. A substantial portion of compensation expense is com- prised of variable incentive arrangements, including discretionary bonuses, the amount of which fluctuates 14 Piper Jaffray Annual Report 2006 in proportion to the level of business activity, increasing with higher revenues and operating profits. Other com- pensation costs, primarily base salaries and benefits, are more fixed in nature. The timing of bonus pay- ments, which generally occur in February, have a greater impact on our cash position and liquidity, than is reflected in our statements of operations. In 2006, compensation and benefits expenses increased 19.5 percent to $291.3 million, from $243.8 million in 2005. This increase was due to higher variable com- pensation costs resulting from increased profitability. Compensation and benefits expenses as a percentage of net revenues were flat at 57.9 percent for 2006 and 2005. Compensation and benefits expenses decreased 2.9 per- cent to $243.8 million in 2005, from $251.2 million in 2004. The decrease was attributable to lower net rev- enues and profitability and the savings from the restructuring actions taken in the second quarter of 2005. Compensation and benefits expenses as a per- centage of net revenues were essentially flat at 57.9 per- cent for 2005, compared to 57.8 percent for 2004. Occupancy and Equipment – In 2006, occupancy and equipment expenses were $30.7 million, essentially flat when compared with 2005. In the fourth quarter of 2006, we entered into a new lease contract related to our London office and exited our existing lease. As a result, we incurred approximately $1.2 million in the fourth quarter related to early exit penalties and lease- hold write-offs. Offsetting this expense was a decline in depreciation related to prior investments in technology becoming fully depreciated in the first quarter of 2006. In 2005, occupancy and equipment expenses were $30.8 million, compared with $28.6 million in the prior year. Increased costs associated with additional office space and software costs related to our algorith- mic and program trading (“APT”) capabilities, which we acquired in the fourth quarter of 2004, were par- tially offset by prior investments in technology becom- ing fully depreciated. Communications – Communication expenses include costs for telecommunication and data communication, primarily consisting of expense for obtaining third- party market data information. In 2006, communica- tion expenses were $23.2 million, down 3.3 percent from 2005. The decrease was due to costs savings associated with a change in vendors related to our equity trading system and a portion of these costs are now being recorded within outside services as a result of the change in vendors. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations In 2005, communication expenses were $24.0 million, down 3.1 percent from 2004. The decrease was pri- marily attributable to lower market data service expenses as a result of cost savings initiatives. Floor Brokerage and Clearance – In 2006, floor brokerage and clearance expenses were $13.3 million, compared with $14.8 million in 2005, a decrease of 10.1 percent. This decrease was a result of our continued efforts to reduce expenses associated with accessing electronic communication networks, offset in part by incremental expense related to our European trading system. Floor brokerage and clearance expenses in 2005 increased 5.5 percent to $14.8 million, compared with 2004, due to increased costs associated with APT. Marketing and Business Development – Marketing and business development expenses include travel and entertainment and promotional and advertising costs. In 2006, marketing and business development expenses were $24.7 million, compared with $21.5 million in 2005, an increase of 14.8 percent. This increase was attributable expenses and increased deal-related travel and entertainment costs. conference to higher In 2005, marketing and business development expenses decreased 12.7 percent to $21.5 million, compared with $24.7 million in the prior year. This decrease was largely driven by the impact of cost savings initi- atives to reduce travel and supplies costs. Outside Services – Outside services expenses include securities processing expenses, outsourced technology functions, outside legal fees and other professional fees. Outside services expenses increased to $28.1 million in 2006, compared with $23.9 million for 2005. This increase is due to services associated with our equity trading system being bundled and provided by a single vendor. Previously, these services were provided by multiple vendors and were recorded in various expense categories such as communications, floor brokerage and clearance and outside services expenses based upon the type of service being provided. In addition, we incurred increased professional fee expense related to recruitment of capital markets personnel. Outside services expenses increased to $23.9 million in 2005, compared with $20.4 million in 2004. This increase reflects the costs for outsourcing additional technology functions, which were previously per- formed in-house, and higher legal fees. Cash Award Program – In connection with our spin-off from U.S. Bancorp in 2003, we established a cash award program pursuant to which we granted cash awards to a broad-based group of our employees. The award pro- gram was designed to aid in retention of employees and to compensate for the value of U.S. Bancorp stock options and restricted stock lost by our employees as a result of the spin-off. The cash awards are being expensed over a four-year period ending December 31, 2007. In 2006, cash awards expense decreased 29.1 per- cent to $3.0 million, compared with the prior year. The sale of our PCS branch network resulted in the forfeiture and accelerated vesting of approximately half of our cash awards and as a result, our ongoing cash award expense will decrease. We anticipate incurring approx- imately $1.5 million of cash award expense within con- tinuing operations in 2007. Restructuring-Related Expense – In the third quarter of 2005, we implemented certain expense reduction mea- sures as a means to better align our cost infrastructure with our revenues. This resulted in a pre-tax restruc- turing charge of $8.6 million, consisting of $4.9 million in severance benefits and $3.7 million related to the reduction of office space. Other Operating Expenses – Other operating expenses include insurance costs, license and registration fees, expenses related to our charitable giving program, amortization on intangible assets and litigation-related expenses, which consist of the amounts we reserve and/or pay out related to legal and regulatory matters. Other operating expenses decreased substantially to a positive benefit of $9.1 million in 2006, compared with expenses of $13.6 million in 2005. In the fourth quarter of 2006, we reduced a litigation reserve related to developments in a specific industry-wide litigation mat- ter in which the company, along with other leading securities firms, is a defendant. The change in our litigation reserves related to this specific matter was principally responsible for the significant reduction in other operating expenses in 2006. The difficulty in determining the timing and outcome of legal proceed- ings may effect established reserves in the future, impacting other operating expenses. In 2005, other operating expenses decreased 19.1 per- cent to $13.6 million, compared with $16.9 million in 2004. This decrease was driven by a decline in insur- ance premiums and lower minority interest expense related to our private equity investments. Income Taxes – In 2006, our provision for income taxes from continuing operations was $35.0 million, an effec- tive tax rate of 35.7 percent, compared with $10.9 mil- lion, an effective tax rate of 30.1 percent, for 2005, and compared with $16.7 million, an effective tax rate of 34.1 percent, for 2004. The increased effective tax rate in 2006 compared with 2005 and 2004 was primarily attributable to a higher level of pre-tax income, which reduced the effect of permanent differences. Piper Jaffray Annual Report 2006 15 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations NET REVENUES FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS (DETAIL) FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, (Dollars in thousands) Net revenues: Investment banking Underwriting Fixed income Equities Advisory services Total investment banking Institutional sales and trading Fixed income Equities Total institutional sales and trading Other income/(loss) Total net revenues N/M — Not Meaningful 2006 2005 2004 PERCENT INC/(DEC) 2006 v 2005 2005 v 2004 $ 67,649 $ 62,096 $ 10.5% 8.9% $ 74,751 114,736 105,321 75,026 100,672 87,505 78,066 294,808 243,347 227,667 52.9 4.6 21.1 (14.3) 29.0 6.9 75,170 122,422 197,592 10,534 65,816 80,189 117,380 118,150 14.2 4.3 (17.9) (0.7) 183,196 198,339 7.9 (7.6) (5,235) 8,200 N/M N/M $502,934 $421,308 $434,206 19.4% (3.0)% investment banking revenues increased In 2006, 21.1 percent to $294.8 million, compared with $243.3 million in 2005. Equity underwriting revenues increased 52.9 percent to $114.7 million in 2006, which was due to an increase in completed transactions and an increase in the number of book-run deals, where we earn a larger percentage of revenue per transaction. During 2006, we completed 99 equity financings, rais- ing $13.6 billion in capital for our clients, compared with 73 equity financings, raising $8.8 billion in cap- ital, during 2005. Of these completed transactions, we were bookrunner on 41 of the equity financings in 2006, compared with 25 equity financings in 2005. Our London office completed nine of the total equity financings in 2006, compared with two in 2005. Fixed income financings revenues in 2006 increased 10.5 per- cent to $74.8 million. The increase was driven by higher public finance revenues, as an increase in aver- age revenue per transaction more than offset fewer completed transactions. We underwrote 452 municipal issues with a par value of $6.6 billion during 2006, compared with 473 municipal issues with a par value of $6.1 billion during 2005. Advisory services revenues increased 4.6 percent to $105.3 million in 2006, as higher average revenues per transaction offset the decline in completed transactions. We completed 41 mergers and acquisitions transactions valued at $7.3 billion during 2006, compared with 47 deals valued at $9.1 billion during 2005. Institutional sales and trading revenues comprise all the revenues generated through trading activities, prima- rily the facilitation of customer trades. To assess the profitability of institutional sales and trading activities, we aggregate institutional brokerage revenues with the net interest income or expense associated with financ- ing, economically hedging and holding long or short inventory positions. Our results in sales and trading vary from quarter to quarter with changes in trading margins, trading volumes and the timing of transac- tions as a result of market opportunities. Increased price transparency in the fixed income market, pressure from institutional clients in the equity market to reduce commissions and the use of alternative trading systems in the equity market have put pressure on trading margins. We expect this pressure to continue. In 2006, institutional sales and trading revenues increased 7.9 percent to $197.6 million, compared with $183.2 million in 2005. Fixed income institutional sales and trading revenues increased 14.2 percent to $75.2 million in 2006, compared with $65.8 million in 2005. We were able to improve year-over-year perfor- mance in fixed income institutional sales and trading through higher cash sales and trading and increased high-yield and structured product revenues, offset in part by lower interest rate product revenues. Equity institutional sales and trading revenue increased 4.3 percent in 2006, to $122.4 million due to incre- mental sales and trading revenue related to our Euro- pean expansion and increased revenues from APT and convertibles, partially offset by decreased revenues from lower volumes and pressure by institutional cli- ents to reduce commissions in our traditional equity sales and trading business. 16 Piper Jaffray Annual Report 2006 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations investors. Other income/loss includes gain and losses from invest- ments in private equity and venture capital funds as well as other firm investments and management fees from our private capital business, which provides asset In management services to institutional 2006, other income totaled $10.5 million, compared with a loss of $5.2 million in 2005. During 2006, we recorded a $9.9 million gain related to our ownership of two seats on the New York Stock Exchange, which were exchanged for cash and restricted shares of com- mon stock of the NYSE Group, Inc. In addition, in the third quarter of 2006, we repaid $180 million in sub- ordinated debt with proceeds from the sale of the PCS branch network, which reduced interest expense, and in the third and fourth quarters of 2006, invested the excess proceeds from the sale in short-term interest bearing instruments, which generated interest income. increased 8.9 percent Investment banking revenues increased 6.9 percent to $243.3 million in 2005, compared with $227.7 million in 2004. This increase was primarily attributable to strong advisory services revenues, which increased 29.0 percent to $100.7 million, compared with 2004. We completed 47 mergers and acquisitions deals valued at $9.1 billion in 2005, compared with 49 deals valued at $6.8 billion in 2004. Additionally, fixed income underwriting revenues to $67.6 million in 2005 compared with $62.1 million in 2004. We underwrote 473 municipal issues with a par value of $6.1 billion during 2005, compared with 504 municipal issues with a par value of $5.9 billion during 2004. In 2005, equity underwriting revenues decreased 14.3 percent to $75.0 million. Driving this decline in equity underwriting revenues were less favor- able capital market conditions, particularly during the first half of 2005, that led to a decline in offering activity compared with the prior year. During 2005, we completed 73 equity offerings, raising $8.8 billion in capital for our clients, compared with 94 equity offerings, raising $12.9 billion in capital, during 2004. In 2005, institutional sales and trading revenues decreased 7.6 percent to $183.2 million, compared with $198.3 million in 2004. Fixed income institu- tional sales and trading revenues declined 17.9 percent to $65.8 million in 2005, compared with $80.2 million in 2004. Rising interest rates and a flattened yield curve resulted in reduced sales and trading volumes in fixed income products. Additionally, trading margins declined in 2005, due largely to increased price trans- parency in the corporate bond markets and growth in electronic trading. In early 2005, certain high-yield bonds for which we issue proprietary research became subject to TRACE disclosure requirements. These high- yield bonds represent a substantial portion of our overall corporate bond sales and trading. In 2005, equity institutional sales and trading revenue were essentially flat when compared with 2004. We experi- enced downward pressure on net commissions in the cash equities business in 2005 as a result of increased pressure from institutional clients to reduce transaction costs. The decline in net commissions in our cash equities business was offset by increased electronic trading revenue from our APT capabilities acquired in the fourth quarter of 2004. Other income/loss in 2005 was a loss of $5.2 million compared with income of $8.2 million in 2004. This fluctuation is driven by two primary factors. First, in 2004, higher gains were recorded on our private equity investments and our results included revenues associ- ated with our venture capital business, the management of which was transitioned to an independent company effective December 31, 2004. Second, in 2005, the interest rate on our outstanding subordinated debt increased by approximately 200 bps, increasing the amount of interest expense recorded in 2005. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS Discontinued operations include the operating results of our PCS business, the gain on sale of the PCS branch network, and restructuring and transaction costs. The sale of the PCS branch network to UBS closed on August 11, 2006. Our PCS retail brokerage business provided financial advice and a wide range of financial products and services to individual investors through a network of approximately 90 branch offices. Revenues were gen- erated primarily through the receipt of commissions earned on equity and fixed income transactions and for distribution of mutual funds and annuities, fees earned on fee-based client accounts and net interest from customers’ margin loan balances. In 2006, income from discontinued operations, net of tax, was $172.4 million. See Note 4 to our consolidated financial statements for further discussion of our dis- continued operations. In connection with the sale of our PCS branch network, we implemented a plan to significantly restructure our support infrastructure. We recorded $60.7 million in pre-tax restructuring costs in 2006. We expect to incur additional restructuring costs in the first and second quarters of 2007 related to transitioning off of our retail-based back office system as we convert to a capital markets back office system. In addition, we may incur discontinued operations expense or income related to changes in litigation reserve estimates for retained PCS litigation matters and for changes in Piper Jaffray Annual Report 2006 17 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations estimates related to occupancy and severance restruc- turing charges. Recent Accounting Pronouncements Recent accounting pronouncements are set forth in Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report to Shareholders, and are incorporated herein by reference. Critical Accounting Policies Our accounting and reporting policies comply with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and conform to practices within the securities industry. The preparation of financial statements in compliance with GAAP and industry practices requires us to make estimates and assumptions that could materially affect amounts reported in our consolidated financial state- ments. Critical accounting policies are those policies that we believe to be the most important to the por- trayal of our financial condition and results of opera- tions and that require us to make estimates that are difficult, subjective or complex. Most accounting pol- icies are not considered by us to be critical accounting policies. Several factors are considered in determining whether or not a policy is critical, including, among others, whether the estimates are significant to the consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, the nature of the estimates, the ability to readily val- idate the estimates with other information, including third-party or independent sources, the sensitivity of the estimates to changes in economic conditions and whether alternative accounting methods may be used under GAAP. For a full description of our significant accounting policies, see Note 2 to our consolidated financial state- ments included in our Annual Report to Shareholders. We believe that of our significant accounting policies, the following are our critical accounting policies. VALUATION OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS Trading securities owned, trading securities owned and pledged as collateral, and trading securities sold, but not yet purchased, on our consolidated statements of financial condition consist of financial instruments recorded at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses related to these financial instruments are reflected on our consolidated statements of operations. The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation sale. When available, we use 18 Piper Jaffray Annual Report 2006 instruments observable market prices, observable market parame- ters, or broker or dealer prices (bid and ask prices) to derive the fair value of the instrument. In the case of financial transacted on recognized exchanges, the observable market prices represent quo- tations for completed transactions from the exchange on which the financial instrument is principally traded. Bid prices represent the highest price a buyer is willing to pay for a financial instrument at a particular time. Ask prices represent the lowest price a seller is willing to accept for a financial instrument at a particular time. A substantial percentage of the fair value of our trading securities owned, trading securities owned and pledged as collateral, and trading securities sold, but not yet purchased, are based on observable market prices, observable market parameters, or derived from broker or dealer prices. The availability of observable market prices and pricing parameters can vary from product to product. Where available, observable market prices and pricing or market parameters in a product may be used to derive a price without requiring significant judgment. In certain markets, observable market prices or market parameters are not available for all products, and fair value is determined using techniques appro- priate for each particular product. These techniques involve some degree of judgment. For investments in illiquid or privately held securities that do not have readily determinable fair values, the determination of fair value requires us to estimate the value of the securities using the best information avail- able. Among the factors considered by us in determin- ing the fair value of financial instruments are the cost, terms and liquidity of the investment, the financial condition and operating results of the issuer, the quoted market price of publicly traded securities with similar quality and yield, and other factors generally pertinent to the valuation of investments. In instances where a security is subject to transfer restrictions, the value of the security is based primarily on the quoted price of a similar security without restriction but may be reduced by an amount estimated to reflect such restrictions. In addition, even where the value of a security is derived from an independent source, certain assumptions may be required to determine the security’s fair value. For instance, we assume that the size of positions in secu- rities that we hold would not be large enough to affect the quoted price of the securities if we sell them, and that any such sale would happen in an orderly manner. The actual value realized upon disposition could be different from the currently estimated fair value. Fair values for derivative contracts represent amounts estimated to be received from or paid to a third party in settlement of these instruments. These derivatives are Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations valued using quoted market prices when available or pricing models based on the net present value of esti- mated future cash flows. Management deemed the net present value of estimated future cash flows model to be the best estimate of fair value as most of our deriv- ative products are interest rate products. The valuation models used require inputs including contractual terms, market prices, yield curves, credit curves and measures of volatility. The valuation models are monitored over the life of the derivative product. If there are any changes in the underlying inputs, the model is updated for those new inputs. The following table presents the carrying value of our trading securities owned, trading securities owned and pledged as collateral and trading securities sold, but not yet purchased for which fair value is measured based on quoted prices or other independent sources versus those for which fair value is determined by management. DECEMBER 31, 2006 (Dollars in thousands) Fair value of securities excluding derivatives, based on quoted prices and independent sources Fair value of securities excluding derivatives, as determined by management Fair value of derivatives as determined by management Trading Securities Owned or Pledged Trading Securities Sold, But Not Yet Purchased $824,049 $211,098 17,336 25,141 – 6,486 $866,526 $217,584 Financial instruments carried at contract amounts that approximate fair value have short-term maturities (one year or less), are repriced frequently or bear market interest rates and, accordingly, are carried at amounts approximating fair value. Financial instruments carried at contract amount on our consolidated statements of financial condition include receivables from and pay- ables to brokers, dealers and clearing organizations, securities purchased under agreements to resell, secu- rities sold under agreements to repurchase, receivables from and payables to customers, short-term financing and subordinated debt. In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Stan- dards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 157, “Fair Value Measure- ments” (“SFAS 157”). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures regarding fair value measure- ments. SFAS 157 does not require any new fair value measurements, but its application may, for some enti- ties, change current practice. SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We are currently evaluating the impact of SFAS 157 on our results of operations and financial condition. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS We record all assets and liabilities acquired in purchase fair value as including goodwill, at acquisitions, required by Statement of Financial Accounting Stan- dards No. 141, “Business Combinations.” Determin- ing the fair value of assets and liabilities acquired requires certain management estimates. In conjunction with the sale of our PCS branch network to UBS, we wrote-off $85.6 million of goodwill during the third quarter of 2006. At December 31, 2006, we had good- will of $231.6 million, principally as a result of the 1998 acquisition of our predecessor, Piper Jaffray Companies Inc., and its subsidiaries by U.S. Bancorp. Under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” we are required to perform impairment tests of our goodwill and intangible assets annually and more fre- quently in certain circumstances. We have elected to test for goodwill impairment in the fourth quarter of each calendar year. The goodwill impairment test is a two-step process, which requires management to make judgments in determining what assumptions to use in the calculation. The first step of the process consists of estimating the fair value of our operating segment based on a discounted cash flow model using revenue and profit forecasts and comparing those estimated fair values with carrying values, which includes the allo- cated goodwill. If the estimated fair value is less than the carrying values, a second step is performed to compute the amount of the impairment by determining an “implied fair value” of goodwill. The determination of a reporting unit’s “implied fair value” of goodwill requires us to allocate the estimated fair value of the reporting unit to the assets and liabilities of the report- ing unit. Any unallocated fair value represents the “implied fair value” of goodwill, which is compared to its corresponding carrying value. We completed our last goodwill impairment test as of October 31, 2006, and no impairment was identified. Piper Jaffray Annual Report 2006 19 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations As noted above, the initial recognition of goodwill and other intangible assets and the subsequent impairment analysis requires management to make subjective judg- ments concerning estimates of how the acquired assets or businesses will perform in the future using valuation methods including discounted cash flow analysis. Events and factors that may significantly affect the estimates include, among others, competitive forces and changes in revenue growth trends, cost structures, technology, discount rates and market conditions. Additionally, estimated cash flows may extend beyond ten years and, by their nature, are difficult to determine over an extended time period. To assess the reason- ableness of cash flow estimates and validate assump- tions used in our estimates, we review historical performance of the underlying assets or similar assets. In assessing the fair value of our operating segment, the volatile nature of the securities markets and our indus- try requires us to consider the business and market cycle and assess the stage of the cycle in estimating the timing and extent of future cash flows. In addition to estimating the fair value of an operating segment based on discounted cash flows, we consider other informa- tion to validate the reasonableness of our valuations, including public market comparables and multiples of recent mergers and acquisitions of similar businesses. Valuation multiples may be based on revenues, pri- ce-to-earnings and tangible capital ratios of compara- ble public companies and business segments. These multiples may be adjusted to consider competitive dif- ferences including size, operating leverage and other factors. If during any future period it is determined that an impairment exists, the results of operations in that period could be materially adversely affected. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION As part of our compensation to employees and direc- tors, we use stock-based compensation, consisting of stock options and restricted stock. Prior to January 1, 2006, we elected to account for stock-based employee compensation on a prospective basis under the fair value method, as prescribed by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, “Accounting and Dis- closure of Stock-Based Compensation,” and as amended by Statement of Financial Accounting Stan- dards No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compen- sation – Transition and Disclosure.” The fair value method required stock based compensation to be expensed in the consolidated statement of operations at their fair value. Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment,” (“SFAS 123(R)”), using the 20 Piper Jaffray Annual Report 2006 modified prospective transition method. SFAS 123(R)re- quires all stock-based compensation to be expensed in the consolidated statement of operations at fair value, net of estimated forfeitures. Because we have expensed all equity awards based on the fair value method, net of estimated forfeitures, SFAS 123(R) did not have a material effect on our measurement or recognition methods for stock-based compensation. Compensation paid to employees in the form of stock options or restricted stock is generally amortized on a straight-line basis over the required service period of the award, which is typically three years, and is included in our results of operations as compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures. The majority of our restricted stock grants provide for continued vest- ing after termination, providing the employee does not violate certain post-termination restrictions, as set forth in the award agreements. We consider the required service period to be the greater of the vesting period or the post-termination restricted period. We believe that our non-competition restrictions meet the SFAS 123(R) definition of a substantive service requirement. Stock-based compensation granted to our non- employee directors is in the form of stock options. Stock-based compensation paid to directors is imme- diately vested (i.e., there is no continuing service requirement) and is included in our results of opera- tions as outside services expense as of the date of grant. In determining the estimated fair value of stock options, we use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. This model requires management to exercise judgment with respect to certain assumptions, includ- ing the expected dividend yield, the expected volatility, and the expected life of the options. The expected dividend yield assumption is based on the assumed dividend payout over the expected life of the option. The expected volatility assumption is based on industry comparisons, as we have limited information on which to base our volatility estimates because we have only been a public company since the beginning of 2004. The expected life of options assumption is based on the average of the following two factors: industry compar- isons and the guidance provided by the SEC in Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (“SAB 107”). SAB 107 allowed the use of an “acceptable” methodology under which we can take the midpoint of the vesting date and the full contractual term. We believe our approach for calculating an expected life to be an appropriate method in light of the lack of any historical data regarding employee exercise behavior or employee post-termination behavior. Additional information regarding assumptions used in the Black-Scholes Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations pricing model can be found in Note 20 to our consol- idated financial statements. CONTINGENCIES We are involved in various pending and potential legal proceedings related to our business, including litiga- tion, arbitration and regulatory proceedings. Some of these matters involve claims for substantial amounts, including claims for punitive and other special dam- ages. The number of these legal proceedings has increased in recent years. We have, after consultation with outside legal counsel and consideration of facts currently known by management, recorded estimated losses in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 5, “Accounting for Contin- gencies,” to the extent that claims are probable of loss and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. The determination of these reserve amounts requires significant judgment on the part of management. In making these determinations, we consider many fac- tors, including, but not limited to, the loss and damages sought by the plaintiff or claimant, the basis and valid- ity of the claim, the likelihood of a successful defense against the claim, and the potential for, and magnitude of, damages or settlements from such pending and potential litigation and arbitration proceedings, and fines and penalties or orders from regulatory agencies. Under the terms of our separation and distribution agree- ment with U.S. Bancorp and ancillary agreements entered into in connection with the spin-off, we generally are responsible for all liabilities relating to our business, including those liabilities relating to our business while it was operated as a segment of U.S. Bancorp under the supervision of its management and board of directors and while our employees were employees of U.S. Bancorp servicing our business. Similarly, U.S. Bancorp generally is responsible for all liabilities relating to the businesses U.S. Bancorp retained. However, in addition to our estab- lished reserves, U.S. Bancorp agreed to indemnify us in an amount up to $17.5 million for losses that result from certain matters, primarily third-party claims relating to research analyst independence. U.S. Bancorp has the right to terminate this indemnification obligation in the event of a change in control of our company. As of December 31, 2006, approximately $13.2 million of the indemnification remained available. As part of our asset purchase agreement with UBS for the sale of our PCS branch network, UBS agreed to assume certain liabilities of the PCS business, including certain liabilities and obligations arising from litiga- tion, arbitration, customer complaints and other claims related to the PCS business. In certain cases we have agreed to indemnify UBS for litigation matters after UBS has incurred costs of $6.0 million related to these matters. In addition, we have retained liabilities arising from regulatory matters and certain litigation relating to the PCS business prior to the sale. Subject to the foregoing, we believe, based on our current knowledge, after appropriate consultation with outside legal counsel and after taking into account our established reserves, the U.S. Bancorp indemnity agree- ment and the assumption by UBS of certain liabilities of the PCS business, that pending litigation, arbitration and regulatory proceedings will be resolved with no material adverse effect on our financial condition. However, if, during any period, a potential adverse contingency should become probable or resolved for an amount in excess of the established reserves and indemnification, the results of operations in that period could be materially adversely affected. Liquidity and Capital Resources Liquidity is of critical importance to us given the nature of our business. Insufficient liquidity resulting from adverse circumstances contributes to, and may be the cause of, financial institution failure. Accordingly, we regularly monitor our liquidity position, including our cash and net capital positions, and we have imple- mented a liquidity strategy designed to enable our business to continue to operate even under adverse circumstances, although there can be no assurance that our strategy will be successful under all circumstances. We have a liquid balance sheet. Most of our assets consist of cash and assets readily convertible into cash. Securities inventories are stated at fair value and are generally readily marketable. Receivables and payables with customers and brokers and dealers usually settle within a few days. As part of our liquidity strategy, we emphasize diversification of funding sources. We utilize a mix of funding sources and, to the extent possible, maximize our lower-cost financing alternatives. Our assets are financed by our cash flows from operations, equity capital, bank lines of credit and proceeds from securities sold under agreements to repurchase. The fluctuations in cash flows from financing activities are directly related to daily operating activities from our various businesses. A significant component of our employees’ compensa- tion is paid in an annual bonus. The timing of these bonus payments, which generally are paid in February, has a significant impact on our cash position and liquidity when paid. We currently do not pay cash dividends on our common stock. Piper Jaffray Annual Report 2006 21 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations On August 11, 2006, we closed the sale of our PCS branch network and certain related assets to UBS. We received proceeds of approximately $500 million for our branch network and $250 million for certain other assets, consisting primarily of customer margin loans. During the third quarter of 2006, we utilized these proceeds to repay all of our $180 million in subordi- nated debt outstanding, repurchase approximately 1.6 million shares of common stock through an accel- erated share repurchase program for an aggregate price of $100 million, repay stock loan liabilities and reduce securities sold under agreements to repurchase. During the fourth quarter of 2006, we paid approximately $160 million in income tax liabilities related to the gain on the sale of our PCS branch network. Cash and cash equivalents decreased $17.0 million in 2004 to $67.4 million at December 31, 2004. Operat- ing activities used cash of $3.2 million, as cash received from earnings and operating assets and liabilities was exceeded by cash utilized toward fails to deliver, stock borrowed and for processing accounts. Cash of $30.2 million was used for investing activities toward the purchase of fixed assets and the acquisition of Vie Securities, LLC. Cash of $16.4 million was generated including $133.6 million by financing activities, received from secured financing and $41.7 million from securities loaned. The cash gener- ated through repurchase agreements and securities loaned financing was offset by a net reduction of short-term borrowings of $159.0 million. activities In connection with the sale of our PCS branch network, our board of directors authorized the repurchase of $180 million in common shares through December 31, 2007. Following the completion of our accelerated share repurchase, we have $80 million of share repur- chase authorization remaining. CASH FLOWS Cash and cash equivalents decreased $21.0 million to $39.9 million at December 31, 2006. Operating activ- ities used cash of $72.4 million, as cash paid out for operating assets and liabilities exceeded cash received from earnings. Cash of $707.4 million was provided by investing activities due to the sale of the PCS branch network to UBS. Cash of $657.2 million was used in financing activities. We used the proceeds from the sale of PCS to repay $180 million in subordinated debt and repurchase approximately 1.6 million shares of com- mon stock through an accelerated share repurchase program in the amount of $100 million. In addition, we paid down other short-term borrowings used to finance our continuing operations. Cash and cash equivalents decreased $6.5 million in 2005 to $60.9 million at December 31, 2005. Operat- ing activities provided cash of $95.2 million, as cash received from earnings and operating assets and liabil- ities exceeded cash utilized to increase net trading securities owned. Cash of $15.3 million was used for investing activities toward the purchase of fixed assets. Cash of $86.3 million was used in financing activities, including a $55.5 million reduction of our secured financing activities and $42.6 million utilized to repur- chase common stock in conjunction with a share repur- chase program of 1.3 million shares of common stock completed on October 4, 2005. The cash used in financing activities was offset by an increase in securi- ties loaned activities of $11.8 million. FUNDING SOURCES We have available discretionary short-term financing on both a secured and unsecured basis. Secured financ- ing is obtained through the use of repurchase agree- ments and secured bank loans. Bank loans and repurchase agreements are typically collateralized by the firm’s securities inventory. Short-term funding is generally obtained at rates based upon the federal funds rate. To finance customer receivables we utilized an average of $15 million in short-term bank loans and an average of $133 million in securities lending arrangements in 2006. This compares to an average of $38 million in short-term bank loans and $244 million in average securities lending arrangements in 2005. Average net repurchase agreements (excluding economic hedges) of $80 million and $176 million in 2006 and in 2005, respectively, were primarily used to finance inventory. The reduction in average short-term bank loans, secu- rities lending arrangements and average net repurchase agreements during 2006 was due to the receipt of approximately $750 million in proceeds from the sale of our PCS branch network. Growth in our securities inventory is generally financed through repurchase agreements or securities lending. Bank financing sup- plements these sources as necessary. On December 31, 2006, we had no outstanding short-term bank financing. As of December 31, 2006, we had uncommitted credit agreements with banks totaling $675 million, com- prised of $555 million in discretionary secured lines and $120 million in discretionary unsecured lines. We have been able to obtain necessary short-term borrow- ings in the past and believe we will continue to be able to do so in the future. We also have established arrange- ments to obtain financing using as collateral our 22 Piper Jaffray Annual Report 2006 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations securities held by our clearing bank or by another broker dealer at the end of each business day. On August 15, 2006, we utilized proceeds from the sale of our PCS branch network to repay in full our $180 million subordinated loan with U.S. Bancorp. CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS The following table provides a summary of our con- tractual obligations as of December 31, 2006: (Dollars in millions) Operating leases Cash award program Venture fund commitments a Purchase obligations 2008 Through 2009 2010 Through 2011 2012 and Thereafter Total 29.7 25.7 28.4 96.5 – – 4.1 – – – – – – 1.5 5.9 7.4 2007 12.7 1.5 – 3.3 (a) The venture fund commitments have no specified call dates. The timing of capital calls is based on market conditions and investment opportunities. CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS As a registered broker dealer and member firm of the NYSE, our broker dealer subsidiary is subject to the uniform net capital rule of the SEC and the net capital rule of the NYSE. We have elected to use the alternative method permitted by the uniform net capital rule, which requires that we maintain minimum net capital of the greater of $1.0 million or 2 percent of aggregate debit balances arising from customer transactions, as this is defined in the rule. The NYSE may prohibit a member firm from expanding its business or paying dividends if resulting net capital would be less than 5 percent of aggregate debit balances. Advances to affiliates, repayment of subordinated liabilities, divi- dend payments and other equity withdrawals are sub- ject to certain notification and other provisions of the uniform net capital rule and the net capital rule of the NYSE. We expect that these provisions will not impact our ability to meet current and future obligations. In addition, we are subject to certain notification require- ments related to withdrawals of excess net capital from our broker dealer subsidiary. Piper Jaffray Ltd., our registered United Kingdom broker dealer subsidiary, is subject to the capital requirements of the U.K. Financial Services Authority. At December 31, 2006, net capital under the SEC’s Uniform Net Capital Rule was $367.1 million or 395.3 percent of aggregate debit balances, and $365.3 million in excess of the minimum required net capital. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements We enter into various types of off-balance sheet arrangements in the ordinary course of business. We hold retained interests in non-consolidated entities, incur obligations to commit capital to non-consoli- dated entities, enter into derivative transactions, enter into non-derivative guarantees, commit to short-term “bridge loan” financing for our clients and enter into other off-balance sheet arrangements. We enter into arrangements with special-purpose enti- ties (“SPEs”), also known as variable interest entities. SPEs are corporations, trusts or partnerships that are established for a limited purpose. SPEs, by their nature, generally are not controlled by their equity owners, as the establishing documents govern all material deci- sions. Our primary involvement with SPEs relates to securitization transactions related to our tender option bond program in which highly rated fixed rate munic- ipal bonds are sold to an SPE. We follow Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities – a Replacement of FASB Statement No. 125,” (“SFAS 140”), to account for securitizations and other transfers of financial assets. Therefore, we derecognize financial assets trans- ferred in securitizations provided that such transfer meets all of the SFAS 140 criteria. See Note 6, “Securi- tizations,” in the notes to our consolidated financial statements for a complete discussion of our securitiza- tion activities. We have investments in various entities, typically part- nerships or limited liability companies, established for the purpose of investing in emerging growth companies or other private or public equity. We commit capital or act as the managing partner or member of these entities. These entities are reviewed under variable interest entity and voting interest entity standards. If we deter- mine that an entity should not be consolidated, we record these investments on the equity method of accounting. The lower of cost or market method of accounting is applied to investments where we do not have the ability to exercise significant influence over Piper Jaffray Annual Report 2006 23 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations the operations of an entity. For a complete discussion of our activities related to these types of partnerships, see Note 7, “Variable Interest Entities,” to our consoli- dated financial statements included in our Annual Report to Shareholders on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. We enter into derivative contracts in a principal capac- ity as a dealer to satisfy the financial needs of clients. We also use derivative products to manage the interest rate and market value risks associated with our security positions. For a complete discussion of our activities related to derivative products, see Note 5, “Deriva- tives,” in the notes to our consolidated financial statements. In the third quarter of 2006, we entered into a strategic relationship with CIT to provide clients with debt solutions, including senior secured and unsecured debt, second lien facilities, subordinated financings and mez- zanine loans. Our strategic relationship with CIT offers us the possibility of making commitments of capital alongside CIT in connection with offering debt solu- tions to our clients as opportunities arise. Our other types of off-balance-sheet arrangements include contractual commitments and guarantees. For a discussion of our activities related to these off- balance sheet arrangements, see Note 15, “Contingen- cies, Commitments and Guarantees,” to our consoli- dated financial statements included in our Annual Report to Shareholders on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. Enterprise Risk Management Risk is an inherent part of our business. In the course of conducting business operations, we are exposed to a variety of risks. Market risk, credit risk, liquidity risk, operational risk, and legal, regulatory and compliance risk are the principal risks we face in operating our business. We seek to identify, assess and monitor each risk in accordance with defined policies and proce- dures. The extent to which we properly identify and effectively manage each of these risks is critical to our financial condition and profitability. among trading traders, With respect to market risk and credit risk, the corner- stone of our risk management process is daily commu- nication department management and senior management concerning our inventory positions and overall risk profile. Our risk management functions supplement this communica- tion process by providing their independent perspec- tives on our market and credit risk profile on a daily basis through a series of reports. The broader goals of 24 Piper Jaffray Annual Report 2006 our risk management functions are to understand the risk profile of each trading area, to consolidate risk monitoring company-wide, to articulate large trading or position risks to senior management, and to ensure accurate mark-to-market pricing. In addition to supporting daily risk management pro- cesses on the trading desks, our risk management func- tions support our Market and Credit Risk Committee. This committee oversees risk management practices, including defining acceptable risk tolerances and approving risk management policies. MARKET RISK Market risk represents the risk of financial volatility that may result from the change in value of a financial instrument due to fluctuations in its market price. Our exposure to market risk is directly related to our role as a financial intermediary for our clients, to our market- making activities and our proprietary activities. Mar- ket risk is inherent in both cash and derivative financial instruments. The scope of our market risk management policies and procedures includes all market-sensitive financial instruments. Our different types of market risk include: (cid:129) Interest Rate Risk — Interest rate risk represents the potential volatility from changes in market interest rates. We are exposed to interest rate risk arising from changes in the level and volatility of interest rates, changes in the shape of the yield curve, changes in credit spreads, and the rate of prepayments. Interest rate risk is managed through the use of appropriate hedging in U.S. government securities, agency securi- ties, mortgage-backed securities, corporate debt secu- rities, interest rate swaps, options, futures and forward contracts. We utilize interest rate swap contracts to hedge a portion of our fixed income inventory, to hedge residual cash flows from our tender option bond pro- gram, and to hedge rate lock agreements and forward bond purchase agreements we may enter into with our public finance customers. These interest rate swap contracts are recorded at fair value with the changes in fair value recognized in earnings. (cid:129) Equity Price Risk – Equity price risk represents the potential loss in value due to adverse changes in the level or volatility of equity prices. We are exposed to equity price risk through our trading activities in both listed and over-the-counter equity markets. We attempt to reduce the risk of loss inherent in our market-making and in our inventory of equity securities by establishing limits on the notional level of our inventory and by managing net position levels with those limits. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations VALUE-AT-RISK Value-at-Risk (“VaR”) is the potential loss in value of our trading positions due to adverse market movements over a defined time horizon with a specified confidence level. We perform a daily historical simulated VaR analysis on substantially all of our trading positions, including fixed income, equities, convertible bonds and all associated economic hedges. We use a VaR model because it provides a common metric for assessing market risk across business lines and products. The modeling of the market risk characteristics of our trad- ing positions involves a number of assumptions and approximations. While we believe that these assump- tions and approximations are reasonable, different assumptions and approximations could produce mate- rially different VaR estimates. We report an empirical VaR based on net realized trading revenue volatility. Empirical VaR presents an inclusive measure of our historical risk exposure, as it incorporates virtually all trading activities and types of risk including market, credit, liquidity and operational risk. The exhibit below presents VaR using the past 250 days of net trading revenue. Consistent with indus- try practice, when calculating VaR we use a 95 percent confidence level and a one-day time horizon for calcu- lating both empirical and simulated VaR. This means, that over time, there is a 1 in 20 chance that daily trading net revenues will fall below the expected daily trading net revenues by an amount at least as large as the reported VaR. The following table quantifies the empirical VaR for each component of market risk for the periods presented: AT DECEMBER 31, (Dollars in thousands) Interest Rate Risk Equity Price Risk Aggregate Undiversified Risk Diversification Benefit Aggregate Diversified Value-at-Risk The table below illustrates the daily high, low and average value-at-risk calculated for each component of market risk during the years ended 2006 and 2005, respectively. FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006 (Dollars in thousands) Interest Rate Risk Equity Price Risk Aggregate Undiversified Risk Aggregate Diversified Value-at-Risk FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2005 (Dollars in thousands) Interest Rate Risk Equity Price Risk Aggregate Undiversified Risk Aggregate Diversified Value-at-Risk 2006 2005 $ 281 261 $ 324 345 542 (112) 669 (132) $ 430 $ 537 High Low Average $355 346 679 541 $262 254 521 404 $308 290 598 474 High Low Average $1,436 $324 $538 345 1,705 1,558 258 668 536 314 853 719 Our VaR decreased in 2006, compared to 2005, due to lower fixed income inventory levels. We use model-based VaR simulations for managing risk on a daily basis. Model-based VaR derived from simulation has inherent limitations, including reliance on historical data to predict future market risk and the parameters established in creating the models that limit quantitative risk information outputs. There can be no assurance that actual losses occurring on any given day arising from changes in market conditions will not exceed the VaR amounts shown below or that such losses will not occur more than once in a 20-day trading period. In addition, different VaR methodologies and distribution assumptions could produce materially different VaR numbers. Changes in VaR between reporting periods are generally due to changes in levels of risk exposure, volatilities and/or correlations among asset classes. Piper Jaffray Annual Report 2006 25 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations The following table quantifies the model-based VaR simulated for each component of market risk for the periods presented: AT DECEMBER 31, (Dollars in thousands) Interest Rate Risk Equity Price Risk Aggregate Undiversified Risk Diversification Benefit Aggregate Diversified Value-at-Risk 2006 2005 $ 574 177 $ 309 288 751 (150) 597 (239) $ 601 $ 358 Supplementary measures employed by Piper Jaffray to monitor and manage market risk exposure include the following: net market position, duration exposure, option sensitivities, and inventory turnover. All metrics are aggregated by asset concentration and are used for monitoring limits and exception approvals. We anticipate our aggregate VaR may increase in future periods as we commit more of our own capital to proprietary investments. LIQUIDITY RISK Market risk can be exacerbated in times of trading illiquidity when market participants refrain from trans- acting in normal quantities and/or at normal bid-offer spreads. Depending on the specific security, the struc- ture of the financial product, and/or overall market conditions, we may be forced to hold onto a security for days or weeks longer than we had planned. We are also exposed to liquidity risk in our day-to-day funding activities. In addition to the benefit of having a strong capital structure, we manage this risk by diver- sifying our funding sources across products and among individual counterparties within those products. For example, our treasury department can switch between securities lending, repurchase agreements, box loans and bank borrowings on any given day depending on the pricing and availability of funding from any one of these sources. In addition to managing our capital and funding, the treasury department oversees the management of net interest income risk, portfolio collateral, and the over- all use of our capital, funding, and balance sheet. CREDIT RISK as a holder of securities and as a member of exchanges and clearing organizations. Our client activities involve the execution, settlement and financing of various transactions. Client activities are transacted on a cash, delivery versus payment or margin basis. Our credit exposure to institutional client business is mitigated by the use of industry-standard delivery versus payment through depositories and clearing banks. Credit exposure associated with our customer margin accounts are monitored daily and are collateralized. Our risk management functions, in conjunction with our market and credit risk committee, establish and review appropriate credit limits for our customers uti- lizing margin lending. Our risk management functions review risk associated with institutional counterparties with whom we hold repurchase and resale agreement facilities, stock bor- row or loan facilities, derivatives, TBAs and other documented institutional counterparty agreements that may give rise to credit exposure. Counterparty levels are established relative to the level of counterparty ratings and potential levels of activity. We are subject to credit concentration risk if we hold large individual securities positions, execute large transactions with individual counterparties or groups of related counterparties, extend large loans to indi- vidual borrowers or make substantial underwriting commitments. Concentration risk can occur by indus- try, geographic area or type of client. Potential credit concentration risk is carefully monitored and is man- aged through the use of policies and limits. Credit risk in our Capital Markets business arises from potential non-performance by counterparties, custom- ers, borrowers or issuers of securities we hold in our trading inventory. We are exposed to credit risk in our role as a trading counterparty to dealers and customers, We are also exposed to the risk of loss related to changes in the credit spreads of debt instruments. Credit spread risk arises from potential changes in an issuer’s credit rating or the market’s perception of the issuer’s credit worthiness. 26 Piper Jaffray Annual Report 2006 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations OPERATIONAL RISK Operational risk refers to the risk of direct or indirect loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal pro- cesses, people and systems or from external events. We rely on the ability of our employees, our internal sys- tems and processes and systems at computer centers operated by third parties to process a large number of transactions. In the event of a breakdown or improper operation of our systems or processes or improper action by our employees or third-party vendors, we could suffer financial loss, regulatory sanctions and damage to our reputation. We have business continuity plans in place that we believe will cover critical pro- cesses on a company-wide basis, and redundancies are built into our systems as we have deemed appropriate. These control mechanisms attempt to ensure that oper- ations policies and procedures are being followed and that our various businesses are operating within estab- lished corporate policies and limits. LEGAL, REGULATORY AND COMPLIANCE RISK Legal, regulatory and compliance risk includes the risk of non-compliance with applicable legal and regulatory requirements and the risk that a counterparty’s perfor- mance obligations will be unenforceable. We are gen- erally subject to extensive regulation in the various jurisdictions in which we conduct our business. We have established procedures that are designed to ensure compliance with applicable statutory and regulatory requirements, including, but not limited to, those related to regulatory net capital requirements, sales and trading practices, use and safekeeping of customer funds and securities, credit extension, money-launder- ing, privacy and recordkeeping. We have established internal policies relating to ethics and business conduct, and compliance with applicable legal and regulatory requirements, as well as training and other procedures designed to ensure that these policies are followed. Effects of Inflation Because our assets are liquid in nature, they are not significantly affected by inflation. However, the rate of inflation affects our expenses, such as employee com- pensation, office space leasing costs and communica- tions charges, which may not be readily recoverable in the price of services we offer to our clients. To the extent inflation results in rising interest rates and has other adverse effects upon the securities markets, it may adversely affect our financial position and results of operations. Piper Jaffray Annual Report 2006 27 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS This Annual Report contains forward-looking statements. Statements that are not historical or current facts, including statements about beliefs and expectations, are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements cover, among other things, the future prospects of Piper Jaffray Companies. Forward-looking state- ments involve inherent risks and uncertainties, and important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated, including the following: (1) developments in market and economic conditions have in the past adversely affected, and may in the future adversely affect, our business and profitability, (2) developments in specific sectors of the economy have in the past adversely affected, and may in the future adversely affect, our business and profitability, (3) we may not be able to compete successfully with other companies in the financial services industry who are often larger and better capitalized than we are, (4) we have experienced significant pricing pressure in areas of our business, which may impair our revenues and profitability, (5) the volume of anticipated investment banking transactions may differ from actual results, (6) our ability to attract, develop and retain highly skilled and productive employees is critical to the success of our business, (7) our underwriting and market-making activities may place our capital at risk, (8) an inability to readily divest or transfer trading positions may result in financial losses to our business, (9) use of derivative instruments as part of our risk management techniques may place our capital at risk, while our risk management techniques themselves may not fully mitigate our market risk exposure, (10) an inability to access capital readily or on terms favorable to us could impair our ability to fund operations and could jeopardize our financial condition, (11) increases in capital commitments in our proprietary trading, investing and similar activities increase the potential for significant losses, (12) we may make strategic acquisitions of businesses, engage in joint ventures or divest or exit existing businesses, which could cause us to incur unforeseen expense and have disruptive effects on our business but may not yield the benefits we expect, (13) our technology systems, including outsourced systems, are critical com- ponents of our operations, and failure of those systems or other aspects of our operations infrastructure may disrupt our business, cause financial loss and constrain our growth, (14) our business is subject to extensive regulation that limits our business activities, and a significant regulatory action against our company may have a material adverse financial effect or cause significant reputational harm to our company, (15) regulatory capital requirements may limit our ability to expand or maintain present levels of our business or impair our ability to meet our financial obligations, (16) our exposure to legal liability is significant, and could lead to substantial damages, (17) the business operations that we conduct outside of the United States subject us to unique risks, (18) we may suffer losses if our reputation is harmed, (19) our stock price may fluctuate as a result of several factors, including but not limited to changes in our revenues and operating results, (20) provisions in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws and of Delaware law may prevent or delay an acquisition of our company, which could decrease the market value of our common stock, and (21) other factors identified under “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, and updated in our subsequent reports filed with the SEC. These reports are available at our Web site at www.pi- perjaffray.com and at the SEC Web site at www.sec.gov. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we undertake no obligation to update them in light of new information or future events. 28 Piper Jaffray Annual Report 2006 INDEX TO AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Piper Jaffray Companies Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Consolidated Financial Statements: Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition Consolidated Statements of Operations Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 1 Background Note 2 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Note 3 Recent Accounting Pronouncements Note 4 Discontinued Operations Note 5 Derivatives Note 6 Securitizations Note 7 Variable Interest Entities Note 8 Receivables from and Payables to Brokers, Dealers and Clearing Organizations Note 9 Receivables from and Payables to Customers Note 10 Collateralized Securities Transactions Note 11 Goodwill and Intangible Assets Note 12 Trading Securities Owned and Trading Securities Sold, but Not Yet Purchased Note 13 Fixed Assets Note 14 Financing Note 15 Contingencies, Commitments and Guarantees Note 16 Restructuring Note 17 Shareholders’ Equity Note 18 Earnings Per Share Note 19 Employee Benefit Plans Note 20 Stock-Based Compensation and Cash Award Program Note 21 Net Capital Requirements and Other Regulatory Matters Note 22 Income Taxes Page 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 37 37 40 42 42 43 44 44 45 45 45 46 46 46 47 48 49 50 51 53 56 57 Piper Jaffray Annual Report 2006 29 Piper Jaffray Companies MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over our financial reporting. Our internal control system is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Based on its assessment and those criteria, management has concluded that we maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006. Our independent registered public accounting firm has issued an attestation report on management’s assessment of our internal control over financial reporting. 30 Piper Jaffray Annual Report 2006 Piper Jaffray Companies REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM The Board of Directors and Shareholders Piper Jaffray Companies We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, that Piper Jaffray Companies maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Piper Jaffray Companies’ management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstate- ments. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. In our opinion, management’s assessment that Piper Jaffray Companies maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the COSO criteria. Also, in our opinion, Piper Jaffray Companies maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on the COSO criteria. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the 2006 consolidated financial statements of Piper Jaffray Companies, and our report dated February 28, 2007, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon. Minneapolis, Minnesota February 28, 2007 Piper Jaffray Annual Report 2006 31 Piper Jaffray Companies REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM The Board of Directors and Shareholders Piper Jaffray Companies We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition of Piper Jaffray Companies as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Piper Jaffray Companies at December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of Piper Jaffray Companies’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated February 28, 2007, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon. Minneapolis, Minnesota February 28, 2007 32 Piper Jaffray Annual Report 2006 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION DECEMBER 31, (Amounts in thousands, except share data) Assets Cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents segregated for regulatory purposes Receivables: Customers (net of allowance of $0 at December 31, 2006 and $1,793 at December 31, 2005) Brokers, dealers and clearing organizations Deposits with clearing organizations Securities purchased under agreements to resell Trading securities owned Trading securities owned and pledged as collateral Total trading securities owned Fixed assets (net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $48,603 and $74,840 respectively) Goodwill Intangible assets (net of accumulated amortization of $3,333 and $1,733, respectively) Other receivables Other assets Assets held for sale Total assets Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity Payables: Customers Checks and drafts Brokers, dealers and clearing organizations Securities sold under agreements to repurchase Trading securities sold, but not yet purchased Accrued compensation Other liabilities and accrued expenses Liabilities held for sale Total liabilities Subordinated debt Shareholders’ equity: Common stock, $0.01 par value; Shares authorized: 100,000,000 at December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005; Shares issued: 19,487,319 at December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005; Shares outstanding: 16,984,474 at December 31, 2006 and 18,365,177 at December 31, 2005 Additional paid-in capital Retained earnings Less common stock held in treasury, at cost: 2,502,845 shares at December 31, 2006 and 1,122,142 at December 31, 2005 Other comprehensive income/(loss) Total shareholders’ equity Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Piper Jaffray Companies 2006 2005 $ 39,903 25,000 $ 60,869 – 51,441 312,874 30,223 139,927 776,684 89,842 866,526 25,289 231,567 1,467 39,347 88,283 – 54,421 299,056 64,379 222,844 517,310 236,588 753,898 41,752 317,167 3,067 24,626 69,200 442,912 $1,851,847 $2,354,191 $ 83,899 13,828 210,955 91,293 217,584 164,346 145,503 – 927,408 $ 73,781 53,304 259,597 245,786 332,204 171,551 138,122 145,019 1,419,364 – 180,000 195 723,928 325,684 (126,026) 658 924,439 195 704,005 90,431 (35,422) (4,382) 754,827 $1,851,847 $2,354,191 Piper Jaffray Annual Report 2006 33 Piper Jaffray Companies CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, (Amounts in thousands, except per share data) Revenues: Investment banking Institutional brokerage Interest Other income Total revenues Interest expense Net revenues Non-interest expenses: Compensation and benefits Occupancy and equipment Communications Floor brokerage and clearance Marketing and business development Outside services Cash award program Restructuring-related expense Other operating expenses Total non-interest expenses Income from continuing operations before income tax expense Income tax expense Net income from continuing operations Discontinued operations: Income from discontinued operations, net of tax Net income Earnings per basic common share Income from continuing operations Income from discontinued operations Earnings per basic common share Earnings per diluted common share Income from continuing operations Income from discontinued operations Earnings per diluted common share Weighted average number of common shares outstanding Basic Diluted See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 34 Piper Jaffray Annual Report 2006 2006 2005 2004 $294,808 162,406 63,969 14,054 535,237 32,303 502,934 $243,347 162,068 $227,667 179,604 44,857 3,530 35,718 13,638 453,802 456,627 32,494 22,421 421,308 434,206 291,265 30,660 23,189 13,292 24,731 28,053 2,980 – (9,109) 405,061 97,873 34,974 62,899 243,833 30,808 251,187 28,581 23,987 14,785 21,537 23,881 4,205 8,595 13,646 24,757 14,017 24,660 20,378 4,717 – 16,871 385,277 385,168 36,031 10,863 25,168 49,038 16,727 32,311 172,354 $235,253 14,915 18,037 $ 40,083 $ 50,348 $ 3.49 9.57 $ 13.07 $ 3.32 9.09 $ 12.40 $ $ $ $ 1.34 0.79 2.13 1.32 0.78 2.10 $ $ $ $ 1.67 0.93 2.60 1.67 0.93 2.60 18,002 18,968 18,813 19,081 19,333 19,399 Piper Jaffray Companies CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (Amounts in thousands, except share amounts) Common Shares Outstanding Common Stock Additional Paid-In Capital Retained Earnings Treasury Stock Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss) Total Shareholders’ Equity Balance at December 31, 2003 19,334,261 $193 $669,602 $ – $ Net income Amortization of restricted stock Amortization of stock options Minimum pension liability adjustment – – – – Retirement of common stock (1,000) – – – – – – 50,348 7,119 2,034 – – – – – – Balance at December 31, 2004 19,333,261 $193 $678,755 $ 50,348 $ Net income Amortization of restricted stock Amortization of stock options Minimum pension liability adjustment Foreign currency translation adjustment Issuance of common stock Repurchase of common stock Reissuance of treasury shares – – – – – 154,058 (1,300,000) 177,858 – – – – – 2 – – – 40,083 15,914 3,341 – – 6,010 – (15) – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – (42,612) 7,190 $ – – – – (3,868) – $ 669,795 50,348 7,119 2,034 (3,868) — $(3,868) $ 725,428 – – – (73) (441) – – – 40,083 15,914 3,341 (73) (441) 6,012 (42,612) 7,175 Balance at December 31, 2005 18,365,177 $195 $704,005 $ 90,431 $ (35,422) $(4,382) $ 754,827 Net income Amortization of restricted stock Amortization of stock options Adjustment to unrecognized pension cost, net of tax Foreign currency translation adjustment Repurchase of common stock Reissuance of treasury shares – – – – – (1,648,527) 267,824 – – – – – – – – 235,253 17,893 2,436 – – – (406) – – – – – – – – – – – (100,000) 9,396 – – – 2,988 2,052 – – 235,253 17,893 2,436 2,988 2,052 (100,000) 8,990 Balance at December 31, 2006 16,984,474 $195 $723,928 $325,684 $(126,026) $ 658 $ 924,439 See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Piper Jaffray Annual Report 2006 35 Piper Jaffray Companies CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, (Amounts in thousands) Operating Activities: Net income Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: Depreciation and amortization Gain on sale of PCS branch network Deferred income taxes Loss on disposal of fixed assets Stock-based compensation Amortization of intangible assets Forgivable loan reserve Decrease (increase) in operating assets: Cash and cash equivalents segregated for regulatory purposes Receivables: Customers Brokers, dealers and clearing organizations Deposits with clearing organizations Securities purchased under agreements to resell Net trading securities owned Other receivables Other assets Increase (decrease) in operating liabilities: Payables: Customers Checks and drafts Brokers, dealers and clearing organizations Securities sold under agreements to repurchase Accrued compensation Other liabilities and accrued expenses Assets held for sale Liabilities held for sale Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities Investing Activities: Sale of PCS branch network Purchases of fixed assets, net Acquisition, net of cash acquired Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities Financing Activities: Increase (decrease) in securities loaned (Increase) decrease in securities sold under agreements to repurchase Decrease in short-term bank financing Repayment of subordinated debt Repurchase of common stock Issuance of common stock from treasury Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities Currency adjustment: Effect of exchange rate changes on cash Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period Cash and cash equivalents at end of period Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information — Cash paid during the period for: Interest Income taxes Noncash financing activities — Issuance of common stock for retirement plan obligations: 190,966 shares and 331,434 shares for the twelve months ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 36 Piper Jaffray Annual Report 2006 2006 2005 2004 $ 235,253 $ 40,083 $ 50,348 12,644 (381,030) 4,529 12,392 20,329 1,600 – (25,000) 499 (13,679) 34,156 82,917 (227,341) (14,721) (25,357) 10,093 (39,476) 189,378 (10,703) 4,786 7,485 75,021 (26,182) (72,407) 715,684 (8,314) — 707,370 (234,676) (143,790) — (180,000) (100,000) 1,308 (657,158) 1,229 (20,966) 60,869 18,135 – (475) 320 19,255 1,600 – 21,391 – 6,553 233 9,153 133 (2,100) – 66,000 (4,285) 237,624 6,507 29,079 (183,634) (5,462) 7,036 3,494 (297,405) (4,316) 55,064 27,039 (1,335) 11,302 9,284 (9,966) (39,699) (11,031) 110 (1,651) (38,000) 20,367 (12,620) (1,333) 21,273 (64) (9,975) 43,478 34,885 (24,390) 95,197 (3,192) – (15,257) – – (13,590) (16,624) (15,257) (30,214) 11,774 (55,456) – – (42,612) – 41,736 133,621 (159,000) – – – (86,294) 16,357 (164) (6,518) 67,387 – (17,049) 84,436 $ 39,903 $ 60,869 $ 67,387 $ 41,475 $ 204,896 $ 40,174 $ 20,131 $ 16,647 $ 18,949 $ 9,013 $ 13,187 $ – NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 1 Background Piper Jaffray Companies is the parent company of Piper Jaffray & Co. (“Piper Jaffray”), a securities broker dealer and investment banking firm; Piper Jaffray Ltd., a firm providing securities brokerage and invest- ment banking services in Europe headquartered in London, England; Piper Jaffray Financial Products Inc., an entity that facilitates customer derivative trans- actions; Piper Jaffray Financial Products II Inc., an entity dealing primarily in variable rate municipal products; and other immaterial subsidiaries. Piper Jaffray Companies and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) operate as one reporting segment providing investment banking services and institutional sales, trading and research services. As discussed more fully in Note 4, the Company completed the sale of its Private Client Services branch network and certain related assets to UBS Financial Services, Inc., a subsid- iary of UBS AG (“UBS”), on August 11, 2006, thereby exiting the Private Client Services (“PCS”) business. Note 2 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Piper Jaffray Companies, its subsidiaries, and all other entities in which the Company has a controlling financial interest. All material intercom- pany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. The Company determines whether it has a controlling financial in an entity by first evaluating whether the entity is a voting interest entity, a variable interest entity (“VIE”), a special-purpose entity (“SPE”), or a qualifying special-purpose entity (“QSPE”) under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. interest Voting interest entities are entities in which the total equity investment at risk is sufficient to enable each entity to finance itself independently and provides the equity holders with the obligation to absorb losses, the right to receive residual returns and the right to make decisions about the entity’s activities. Voting interest entities are consolidated in accordance with Account- ing Research Bulletin No. 51, “Consolidated Financial Statements,” (“ARB 51”), as amended. ARB 51 states that the usual condition for a controlling financial interest in an entity is ownership of a majority voting interest. Accordingly, the Company consolidates voting interest entities in which it has all, or a majority of, the voting interest. As defined in Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 46(R), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,” (“FIN 46(R)”), VIEs are entities that lack one or more of the characteristics of a voting interest entity described above. FIN 46(R) states that a controlling financial interest in an entity is present when an enterprise has a variable interest, or combi- nation of variable interests, that will absorb a majority of the entity’s expected losses, receive a majority of the entity’s expected residual returns, or both. The enter- prise with a controlling financial interest, known as the primary beneficiary, consolidates the VIE. Accordingly, the Company consolidates VIEs in which the Company is deemed to be the primary beneficiary. SPEs are trusts, partnerships or corporations estab- lished for a particular limited purpose. The Company follows the accounting guidance in Statement of Finan- cial Accounting Standards No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extin- guishment of Liabilities,” (“SFAS 140”), to determine whether or not such SPEs are required to be consoli- dated. The Company establishes SPEs to securitize fixed rate municipal bonds. The majority of these securitizations meet the SFAS 140 definition of a QSPE. A QSPE can generally be described as an entity with significantly limited powers that are intended to limit it to passively holding financial assets and distributing cash flows based upon predetermined criteria. Based upon the guidance in SFAS 140, the Company does not consolidate such QSPEs. The Company accounts for its involvement with such QSPEs under a financial com- ponents approach in which the Company recognizes only its retained residual interest in the QSPE. The Company accounts for such retained interests at fair value. Certain SPEs do not meet the QSPE criteria due to their permitted activities not being sufficiently limited or to control remaining with one of the owners. These SPEs are typically considered VIEs and are reviewed under FIN 46(R) to determine the primary beneficiary. When the Company does not have a controlling finan- cial interest in an entity but exerts significant influence Piper Jaffray Annual Report 2006 37 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements over the entity’s operating and financial policies (gen- erally defined as owning a voting or economic interest of between 20 percent to 50 percent), the Company accounts for its investment in accordance with the equity method of accounting prescribed by Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 18, “The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock.” (“APB 18”), If the Company does not have a control- ling financial interest in, or exert significant influence over, an entity, the Company accounts for its invest- ment at fair value. USE OF ESTIMATES The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of rev- enues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash and highly liquid investments with maturities of 90 days or less at the date of purchase. In accordance with Rule 15c3-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Piper Jaffray, as a registered broker dealer carrying customer accounts, is subject to requirements related to maintaining cash or qualified securities in a segregated reserve account for the exclu- sive benefit of its customers. COLLATERALIZED SECURITIES TRANSACTIONS Securities purchased under agreements to resell and securities sold under agreements to repurchase are car- ried at the contractual amounts at which the securities will be subsequently resold or repurchased, including accrued interest. It is the Company’s policy to take possession or control of securities purchased under agreements to resell at the time these agreements are entered into. The counterparties to these agreements typically are primary dealers of U.S. government secu- rities and major financial institutions. Collateral is valued daily, and additional collateral is obtained from or refunded to counterparties when appropriate. Securities borrowed and loaned result from transac- tions with other broker dealers or financial institutions and are recorded at the amount of cash collateral advanced or received. These amounts are included in receivables from and payable to brokers, dealers and clearing organizations on the consolidated statements borrowed of condition. Securities financial 38 Piper Jaffray Annual Report 2006 transactions require the Company to deposit cash or other collateral with the lender. Securities loaned trans- actions require the borrower to deposit cash with the Company. The Company monitors the market value of securities borrowed and loaned on a daily basis, with additional collateral obtained or refunded as necessary. Interest is accrued on securities borrowed and loaned transactions and is included in other receivables and other liabilities and accrued expenses on the consoli- dated statements of financial condition and the respec- tive interest income and expense balances on the consolidated statements of operations. CUSTOMER TRANSACTIONS Customer securities transactions are recorded on a settlement date basis, while the related revenues and expenses are recorded on a trade date basis. Customer receivables and payables include amounts related to both cash and margin transactions. Securities owned by customers, including those that collateralize margin or other similar transactions, are not reflected on the consolidated statements of financial condition. REVENUE RECOGNITION Investment Banking – Investment banking revenues, which include underwriting fees, management fees and advisory fees, are recorded when services for the transactions are completed under the terms of each engagement. Expenses associated with such transac- tions are deferred until the related revenue is recognized or the engagement is otherwise concluded. Investment banking revenues are presented net of related expenses. Expenses related to investment banking deals not com- pleted are recognized as non-interest expenses on the statement of operations. Institutional Brokerage – Institutional brokerage reve- nues include (i) commissions received from customers for the execution of brokerage transactions in listed and over — the — counter (OTC) equity, fixed income and convertible debt securities, which are recorded on a trade date basis; (ii) trading gains and losses and (iii) fees received by the Company for equity research. ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS Management estimates an allowance for doubtful accounts to reserve for probable losses from unsecured and partially secured customer accounts. Management is continually evaluating its receivables from customers for collectibility and possible write-off by examining the facts and circumstances surrounding each customer where a loss is deemed possible. FIXED ASSETS Fixed assets include furniture and equipment, software and leasehold improvements. Depreciation of furniture and equipment and software is provided using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives of three to ten years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over their estimated useful life or the life of the lease, whichever shorter. Additionally, certain costs incurred in connection with internal-use software projects are capitalized and amortized over the expected useful life of the asset, generally three to seven years. is LEASES The Company leases its corporate headquarters and other offices under various non-cancelable leases. The leases require payment of real estate taxes, insurance and common area maintenance, in addition to rent. The terms of the Company’s lease agreements generally range up to 10 years. Some of the leases contain renewal options, escalation clauses, rent free holidays and operating cost adjustments. For leases that contain escalations and rent-free holi- days, the Company recognizes the related rent expense on a straight-line basis from the date the Company takes possession of the property to the end of the initial lease term. The Company records any difference between the straight-line rent amounts and amounts payable under the leases in other liabilities and accrued expenses on the consolidated statements of financial condition. Cash or lease incentives received upon entering into certain leases are recognized on a straight-line basis as a reduction of rent expense from the date the Company takes possession of the property or receives the cash to the end of the initial lease term. The Company records the unamortized portion of lease incentives in other liabilities and accrued expenses on the consolidated statements of financial condition. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired using the purchase method of accounting. The recoverability of goodwill is evaluated annually, at a minimum, or on an interim basis if events or circumstances indicate a possible inability to realize the carrying amount. The evaluation includes assessing the estimated fair value of the good- will based on market prices for similar assets, where available, and the present value of the estimated future cash flows associated with the goodwill. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Intangible assets with determinable lives consist of software technologies that are amortized on a straight-line basis over three years. OTHER RECEIVABLES Other receivables includes management fees receivable, accrued interest and loans made to revenue-producing employees, typically in connection with their recruit- ment. These loans are forgiven based on continued employment and are amortized to compensation and benefits using the straight-line method over the respec- tive terms of the loans, which generally range up to three years. Inc. OTHER ASSETS Other assets includes investments in partnerships, investments to fund deferred compensation liabilities, prepaid expenses, and net deferred tax assets. In addi- tion, other assets includes 55,440 restricted shares of NYSE Group, Inc. common stock. On March 7, 2006, upon the consummation of the merger of the New York Stock Exchange, (“NYSE”) and Archipelago Holdings, Inc., NYSE Group, Inc. became the parent company of New York Stock Exchange, LLC (which is the successor to the NYSE) and Archipelago Holdings, Inc. In connection with the merger, the Company received $0.8 million in cash and 157,202 shares of NYSE Group, Inc. common stock in exchange for the two NYSE seats owned by the Company. The Com- pany sold 101,762 shares of NYSE Group, Inc. com- mon stock in a secondary offering during the second quarter of 2006 and the remainder of the shares are subject to restrictions on transfer. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS Substantially all of the Company’s financial instru- ments are recorded on the Company’s consolidated statements of financial condition at fair value or the contract amount. The fair value of a financial instru- ment is the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation sale. Trading securities owned and trading securities sold, but not yet purchased are recorded on a trade date basis and are stated at market or fair value. The Company’s valuation policy is to use quoted market or dealer prices from independent sources where they are available and reliable. A substantial percentage of the fair values recorded for the Company’s trading securities owned and trading securities sold, but not yet purchased are based on observable market prices. The fair values of trading securities for which a quoted market or dealer price is not available are based on management’s esti- mate, using the best information available, of amounts Piper Jaffray Annual Report 2006 39 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements that could be realized under current market conditions. Among the factors considered by management in deter- mining the fair value of these securities are the cost, terms and liquidity of the investment, the financial condition and operating results of the issuer, the quoted market price of securities with similar quality and yield that are publicly traded, and other factors generally pertinent to the valuation of investments. The fair value of over-the-counter derivative contracts are valued using valuation models. The model prima- rily used by the Company is the present value of cash flow model, as most of the Company’s derivative prod- ucts are interest rate swaps. This model requires inputs including contractual terms, market prices, yield curves, credit curves and measures of volatility. Financial instruments carried at contract amounts that approximate fair value either have short-term maturi- ties (one year or less), are repriced frequently, or bear market interest rates and, accordingly, are carried at amounts approximating fair value. Financial instru- ments carried at contract amounts on the consolidated statements of financial condition include receivables from and payables to brokers, dealers and clearing organizations, securities purchased under agreements to resell, securities sold under agreements to repur- chase, receivables from and payables to customers, short-term financing and subordinated debt. The carrying amount of subordinated debt closely approximated fair value based upon market rates of interest available to the Company at December 31, 2005. INCOME TAXES Income tax expense is recorded using the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between amounts reported for income tax purposes and financial state- ment purposes, using current tax rates. A valuation allowance is recognized if it is anticipated that some or all of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, “Accounting and Disclosure of Stock-Based Compensation,” (“SFAS 123”), as amended by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation — Transition and Disclo- sure,” (“SFAS 148”). 123(R), “Share-Based Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Stan- dards No. Payment,” (“SFAS 123(R)”), using the modified prospective tran- sition method. SFAS 123(R)requires all stock-based compensation to be expensed in the consolidated state- ment of operations at fair value, net of estimated for- feitures. Because the Company historically expensed all equity awards based on the fair value method, net of estimated forfeitures, SFAS 123(R) did not have a material effect on the Company’s measurement or rec- ognition methods for stock-based compensation. EARNINGS PER SHARE Basic earnings per common share is computed by divid- ing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the year. Diluted earn- ings per common share is calculated by adjusting the weighted average outstanding shares to assume con- version of all potentially dilutive restricted stock and stock options. FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION The Company consolidates a foreign subsidiary, which has designated its local currency as its functional cur- rency. Assets and liabilities of this foreign subsidiary are translated at year-end rates of exchange, and state- ment of operations accounts are translated at an aver- age rate for the period. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 52, “Foreign Cur- rency Translation,” (“SFAS 52”), gains or losses result- ing from translating foreign currency financial statements are reflected in other comprehensive income, a separate component of shareholders’ equity. Gains or losses resulting from foreign currency trans- actions are included in net income. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION Effective January 1, 2004, the Company adopted the fair value method of accounting for grants of stock- based compensation, as prescribed by Statement of RECLASSIFICATIONS Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. Note 3 Recent Accounting Pronouncements In February 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 155, “Accounting for 40 Piper Jaffray Annual Report 2006 Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments,” (“SFAS 155”), which amends Statement of Financial Accounting Stan- for Derivative dards No. “Accounting 133, Instruments and Hedging Activities,”(“SFAS 133”), and SFAS 140. The provisions of SFAS 155 provide a fair value measurement option for certain hybrid finan- cial instruments that contain an embedded derivative that would otherwise require bifurcation. SFAS 155 also provides clarification that only the simplest sepa- rations of interest payments and principal payments qualify for the exception afforded to interest-only strips and principal-only strips from derivative accounting under paragraph 14 of SFAS 133. The standard also clarifies that concentration of credit risk in the form of subordination are not embedded derivatives. Lastly, the new standard amends SFAS 140 to eliminate the pro- hibition on a qualifying special purpose entity from holding a derivative financial instrument that pertains to a beneficial interest other than another derivative instrument. SFAS 155 is effective for the financial Company for all financial instruments acquired or issued beginning January 1, 2007. Management does not believe the adoption of SFAS 155 will have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements of the Company. In March 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 156, “Accounting for Servic- ing of Financial Assets,” (“SFAS 156”), which amends SFAS 140 with respect to the accounting for separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities. This statement requires an entity to recognize a servicing asset or liability each time it undertakes an obligation to service a financial asset by entering into a servicing contract in certain situations. SFAS 156 also requires servicing assets and servicing liabilities to be initially measured at fair value. The statement permits an entity to subsequently measure each class of separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities by either the amortization method or the fair value method. The amortization method allows the servicing asset or liability to be amor- tized in proportion to and over the period of estimated net service income (loss), and assess the servicing assets or servicing liabilities for impairment or increased obligation based on fair value at each reporting period. Alternatively, an entity may choose the fair value method and measure the servicing asset or servicing liability at fair value at each reporting date and report changes in fair value in earnings in the period the changes occur. SFAS 156 also permits, at its initial adoption, a one-time reclassification of availa- ble-for-sale securities to trading securities as long as the available-for-sale securities are identified in some manner as economic hedges of servicing assets and servicing lia- bilities that a servicer elects to subsequently measure at fair value. SFAS 156 applies to all separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities acquired or issued after the beginning of an entity’s fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006, although early adoption is Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements permitted. The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS 156 as of January 1, 2006. The adoption of SFAS 156 did not have a material impact to the Compa- ny’s consolidated financial statements. In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Tax- es — an interpretation of FASB Statement 109” (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncer- tainty in income taxes recognized in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” FIN 48 prescribes a two-step process to rec- ognize and measure a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The first step is recognition, whereby a determination is made whether it is more- likely-than-not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination based on the technical merits of the position. The second step is to measure a tax position that meets the recognition threshold to determine the amount of benefit to recognize. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. Management is currently evaluating the impact of FIN 48, however, management currently does not believe the adoption of FIN 48 will have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements of the Company. In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Com- issued Staff Accounting Bulle- mission (“SEC”) tin No. 108, “Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements” (“SAB 108”). SAB 108 requires the evaluation of prior year misstate- ments in quantifying misstatements in the current year financial statements. SAB 108 is effective for fiscal years ending after November 15, 2006. In the initial year of adoption, the cumulative effect of applying SAB 108, if any, will be recorded as an adjustment to the beginning balance of retained earnings. In subse- quent years, previously undetected material misstate- ments require restatement of the financial statements. The adoption of SAB 108 did not impact the Compa- ny’s consolidated results of operations or financial condition. In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures regarding fair value measure- ments. SFAS 157 does not require any new fair value measurements, but its application may, for some enti- ties, change current practice. SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Piper Jaffray Annual Report 2006 41 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Company is currently evaluating the impact of SFAS 157 on the Company’s consolidated results of operations and financial condition. In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans — an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R)” (“SFAS 158”). SFAS 158 requires an employer to rec- ognize the overfunded or underfunded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan (other than a multi- employer plan) as an asset or liability in its statement of financial position and to recognize changes in the funded status in the year in which the changes occur through comprehensive income. In addition, SFAS 158 requires disclosure in the notes to the financial statements of the estimated portion of net actuarial gains or losses, prior service costs or credits and tran- sition assets or obligations in other comprehensive income that will be recognized in net periodic benefit cost over the fiscal year. These requirements are effec- tive for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2006. SFAS 158 also requires employers to measure plan assets and benefit obligations as of the date of its year-end statement of financial position. This require- ment is effective for fiscal years ending after Decem- ber 15, 2008. The Company adopted the measurement provisions of SFAS 158 as of December 31, 2006. The adoption of SFAS 158 did not have a material impact to the Com- pany’s consolidated financial statements. Note 4 Discontinued Operations On August 11, 2006, the Company and UBS completed the sale of the Company’s PCS branch network under a previously announced asset purchase agreement. The purchase price under the asset purchase agreement was approximately $750 million, which included $500 mil- lion for the branch network and approximately $250 million for the net assets of the branch network, consisting principally of customer margin receivables. In accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (“SFAS 144”), the results of PCS operations have been classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented and the related assets and liabilities included in the sale have been classified as held for sale. The Company recorded income from discontinued opera- tions net of tax of $172.4 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2006. The Company has reclas- sified $442.9 million in assets and $145.0 million in liabilities as held for sale as of December 31, 2005 related to the sale of the PCS branch network to UBS. Note 5 Derivatives Derivative contracts are financial instruments such as forwards, futures, swaps or option contracts that derive their value from underlying assets, reference rates, indices or a combination of these factors. A derivative contract generally represents future commitments to purchase or sell financial instruments at specified terms on a specified date or to exchange currency or interest payment streams based on the contract or notional amount. Derivative contracts exclude certain cash instruments, such as mortgage-backed securities, inter- est-only and principal-only obligations and indexed 42 Piper Jaffray Annual Report 2006 Upon completion of the sale of the PCS branch network on August 11, 2006, the assets and liabilities related to the PCS branch network were transferred to UBS. In connection with the sale of the Company’s PCS branch network, the Company initiated a plan to sig- nificantly restructure the Company’s support infra- structure. As described more fully in Note 16, the Company incurred $60.7 million in restructuring costs related to the restructuring plan for the twelve months ended December 31, 2006. All restructuring and trans- action costs related to the sale of the PCS branch network are included within discontinued operations in accordance with SFAS 144. The Company expects to incur additional restructuring costs in 2007 related to transitioning off of a retail based back office system as the Company converts to a capital markets back office system. In addition, the Company may incur discon- tinued operations expense or income related to changes in litigation reserve estimates for retained PCS litiga- tion matters and for changes in estimates to occupancy and severance restructuring charges. debt instruments that derive their values or contractu- ally required cash flows from the price of some other security or index. The Company uses interest rate swaps, interest rate locks, and forward contracts to facilitate customer transactions and as a means to manage risk in certain inventory positions. The Company also enters into interest rate swap agreements to manage interest rate exposure associated with holding residual interest secu- rities from its tender option bond program. As of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company was counterparty to notional/contract amounts of $5.8 bil- lion and $4.6 billion, respectively, of derivative instruments. The market or fair values related to derivative contract transactions are reported in trading securities owned and trading securities sold, but not yet purchased on the consolidated statements of financial condition and any unrealized gain or loss resulting from changes in fair values of derivatives is recognized in institutional bro- kerage on the consolidated statements of operations. The Company does not utilize “hedge accounting” as described within SFAS No. 133. Derivatives are reported on a net-by-counterparty basis when a legal right of offset exists under a legally enforceable master netting agreement in accordance with FASB Interpre- tation No. 39, “Offsetting of Amounts Related to Certain Contracts.” Fair values for derivative contracts represent amounts estimated to be received from or paid to a counterparty in settlement of these instruments. These derivatives are valued using quoted market prices when available or pricing models based on the net present value of esti- mated future cash flows. The valuation models used require inputs including contractual terms, market prices, yield curves, credit curves and measures of vol- atility. The net fair value of derivative contracts was approximately $19.7 million and $17.0 million as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Note 6 Securitizations In connection with its tender option bond program, the Company securitizes highly rated municipal bonds. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company had $279.2 million and $298.5 million, respectively, of municipal bonds in securitization. Each municipal bond is sold into a separate trust that is funded by the sale of variable rate certificates to institutional customers seeking variable rate tax-free investment products. These variable rate certificates reprice weekly. Securitization transactions meeting certain SFAS 140 criteria are treated as sales, with the resulting gain included in institutional brokerage on the consol- idated statements of operations. If a securitization does not meet the sale-of-asset requirements of SFAS 140, the transaction is recorded as a borrowing. The Com- pany retains a residual interest in each structure and accounts for the residual interest as a trading security, which is recorded at fair value on the consolidated statements of financial condition. The fair value of retained interests was $8.1 million and $7.3 million at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, with a weighted average life of 8.4 years and 9.3 years, respec- tively. The fair value of retained interests is estimated based on the present value of future cash flows using management’s best estimates of the key assumptions — expected yield, credit losses of 0 percent and a 12 per- cent discount rate. The Company receives a fee to remarket the variable rate certificates derived from the securitizations. At December 31, 2006, the sensitivity of the current fair value of retained interests to immediate 10 percent and 20 percent adverse changes in the key economic assumptions was not material. The sensitivity analysis does not include the offsetting benefit of financial instruments the Company utilizes to hedge risks inher- ent in its retained interests and is hypothetical. Changes in fair value based on a 10 percent or 20 percent vari- ation in an assumption generally cannot be extrapo- lated because the relationship of the change in the assumption to the change in the fair value may not be linear. Also, the effect of a variation in a particular assumption on the fair value of the retained interests is calculated independent of changes in any other assumption; in practice, changes in one factor may result in changes in another, which might magnify or counteract the sensitivities. In addition, the sensitivity analysis does not consider any corrective action that the Company might take to mitigate the impact of any adverse changes in key assumptions. Certain cash flow activity for the municipal bond securitizations described above during 2006, 2005, and 2004 includes: (Amounts in thousands) Proceeds from new securitizations Remarketing fees received Cash flows received on retained interests 2006 2005 2004 $7,578 132 $22,655 $98,822 132 98 6,019 8,465 6,725 Three securitization transactions were designed such that they did not meet the asset sale requirements of SFAS 140; therefore, the Company has consolidated these trusts. As a result, the Company recorded an asset for the underlying bonds of $51.2 million and $45.1 million as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, in trading securities owned and a liability for the certificates sold by the trust for $50.1 million and $44.9 million, respectively, in other liabilities and Piper Jaffray Annual Report 2006 43 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements accrued expenses on the consolidated statement of financial condition. which have been recorded at fair value and resulted in a liability of approximately $5.7 and $4.2 million at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Company enters into interest rate swap agreements to manage interest rate exposure associated with hold- ing residual interest securities from its securitizations, Note 7 Variable Interest Entities In the normal course of business, the Company regu- larly creates or transacts with entities that may be VIEs. These entities are either securitization vehicles or investment vehicles. The Company acts as transferor, seller, investor, or structurer in securitizations. These transactions typi- cally involve entities that are qualifying special purpose entities as defined in SFAS 140. For further discussion on these types of transactions, see Note 6. The Company has investments in and/or acts as the managing partner or member to approximately 19 partnerships and limited liability companies (“LLCs”). These entities were established for the purpose of companies. At investing emerging growth in December 31, 2006, the Company’s aggregate net investment in these partnerships and LLCs totaled $12.8 million. The Company’s remaining commitment to these partnerships and LLCs was $5.9 million at December 31, 2006. The Company has identified one LLC described above as a VIE. Furthermore, it was determined that the Company is not the primary beneficiary of this VIE. However, the Company owns a significant variable interest in the VIE. The VIE had assets approximating $9.3 million at December 31, 2006. The Company’s exposure to loss from this entity is $1.1 million, which is the value of its capital contribution at December 31, 2006. Note 8 Receivables from and Payables to Brokers, Dealers and Clearing Organizations The Company operates a stock loan conduit business. The business consists of a “matched book” where the Company will borrow a security from an independent party in the securities business and then loan the exact same security to a third party who needs the security. The Company earns interest income on the securities borrowed and pays interest expense on the securities loaned, earning a net spread on the transactions. Deposits paid for securities borrowed and deposits received for securities loaned approximate the market value of the securities. Securities failed to deliver and receive represent the contract value of securities that have not been delivered or received by the Company on settlement date. Amounts receivable from brokers, dealers and clearing organizations at December 31 included: (Amounts in thousands) 2006 2005 Receivable arising from unsettled securities transactions, net Deposits paid for securities borrowed Receivable from clearing organizations Securities failed to deliver Other $ 18,233 271,028 $108,454 92,495 6,811 1,674 15,128 50,236 34,946 12,925 $312,874 $299,056 Amounts payable to brokers, dealers and clearing orga- nizations at December 31 included: (Amounts in thousands) Deposits received for securities loaned Payable to clearing organizations Securities failed to receive Other 2006 2005 $189,214 17,140 4,531 70 $234,676 8,117 16,609 195 $210,955 $259,597 44 Piper Jaffray Annual Report 2006 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 9 Receivables from and Payables to Customers Amounts receivable from customers at December 31 included: Amounts payable to customers at December 31 included: (Amounts in thousands) Cash accounts Margin accounts Total receivables 2006 $27,407 24,034 $51,441 2005 (Amounts in thousands) $25,778 28,643 $54,421 Cash accounts Margin accounts Total payables 2006 2005 $ 43,714 40,185 $83,899 $60,249 13,532 $73,781 Securities owned by customers are held as collateral for margin loan receivables. This collateral is not reflected on the consolidated financial statements. Margin loan receivables earn interest at floating interest rates based on prime rates. Payables to customers primarily comprise certain cash balances in customer accounts consisting of customer funds pending settlement of securities transactions and customer funds on deposit. Except for amounts arising from customer short sales, all amounts payable to customers are subject to withdrawal by customers upon their request. Note 10 Collateralized Securities Transactions The Company’s financing and customer securities activities involve the Company using securities as col- lateral. In the event that the counterparty does not meet its contractual obligation to return securities used as collateral, or customers do not deposit additional secu- rities or cash for margin when required, the Company may be exposed to the risk of reacquiring the securities or selling the securities at unfavorable market prices in order to satisfy its obligations to its customers or counterparties. The Company seeks to control this risk by monitoring the market value of securities pledged or used as collateral on a daily basis and requiring adjust- ments in the event of excess market exposure. In the normal course of business, the Company obtains securities purchased under agreements to resell, secu- rities borrowed and margin agreements on terms that permit it to repledge or resell the securities to others. The Company obtained securities with a fair value of approximately $434.2 million and $904.3 million at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, of which $314.3 million and $454.0 million, respectively, has been either pledged or otherwise transferred to others in connection with the Company’s financing activities or to satisfy its commitments under trading securities sold, but not yet purchased. Note 11 Goodwill and Intangible Assets The following table presents the changes in the carrying value of goodwill and intangible assets for the year ended December 31, 2006: (Amounts in thousands) Goodwill Balance at December 31, 2005 Goodwill acquired Goodwill disposed in PCS sale Impairment losses Balance at December 31, 2006 Intangible assets Balance at December 31, 2005 Intangible assets acquired Amortization of intangible assets Impairment losses Balance at December 31, 2006 Continuing Operations Discontinued Operations Consolidated Company $231,567 – – – $231,567 $ 3,067 – (1,600) – $ 85,600 – (85,600) – $ $ – – – – – – $317,167 – (85,600) – $231,567 $ 3,067 – (1,600) – $ 1,467 $ 1,467 $ Piper Jaffray Annual Report 2006 45 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 12 Trading Securities Owned and Trading Securities Sold, but Not Yet Purchased At December 31, trading securities owned and trading securities sold, but not yet purchased were as follows: 2005 (Amounts in thousands) 2006 Owned: Corporate securities: Equity securities Convertible securities Fixed income securities Asset-backed securities U.S. government securities Municipal securities Other Sold, but not yet purchased: Corporate securities: Equity securities Convertible securities Fixed income securities Asset-backed securities U.S. government securities Municipal securities Other $ 14,163 59,118 235,120 158,108 10,715 364,160 25,142 $ 13,260 9,221 68,017 329,057 26,652 286,531 21,160 $866,526 $753,898 $ 31,452 2,543 16,378 51,001 109,719 5 6,486 $ 8,367 2,572 31,588 157,132 127,833 93 4,619 $217,584 $332,204 Note 13 Fixed Assets The following is a summary of fixed assets as of Decem- ber 31, 2006 and 2005: (Amounts in thousands) Furniture and equipment Leasehold improvements Software Projects in process Total Less accumulated depreciation and amortization 2006 2005 $38,514 $ 48,285 18,518 15,601 1,259 19,189 47,813 1,305 73,892 116,592 48,603 74,840 $25,289 $ 41,752 At December 31, 2006, and December 31, 2005, trad- ing securities owned in the amount of $89.8 million and $236.6 million, respectively, had been pledged as col- lateral for the Company’s secured borrowings, repur- chase agreements and securities loaned activities. Trading securities sold, but not yet purchased represent obligations of the Company to deliver the specified security at the contracted price, thereby creating a liability to purchase the security in the market at pre- vailing prices. The Company is obligated to acquire the securities sold short at prevailing market prices, which may exceed the amount reflected on the consolidated statements of financial condition. The Company eco- nomically hedges changes in market value of its trading securities owned utilizing trading securities sold, but not yet purchased, interest rate swaps, futures and exchange-traded options. For the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, depreciation and amortization of furniture and equip- ment, software and leasehold improvements for con- tinuing operations totaled $9.5 million, $11.4 million and $12.5 million, respectively, and are included in occupancy and equipment on the consolidated state- ments of operations. Note 14 Financing The Company had uncommitted credit agreements with banks totaling $675 million at December 31, 2006 and 2005, comprised of $555 million in discre- tionary secured lines under which no amount was outstanding at December 31, 2006 and 2005, and $120 million in discretionary unsecured lines under which no amount was outstanding at December 31, 2006 and 2005. In addition, the Company has estab- lished arrangements to obtain financing using as col- lateral the Company’s securities held by its clearing bank and by another broker dealer at the end of each business day. Repurchase agreements and securities loaned to other broker dealers are also used as sources of funding. 46 Piper Jaffray Annual Report 2006 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements On August 15, 2006 the Company utilized proceeds from the sale of its PCS branch network to pay in full its $180 million subordinated loan with U.S. Bancorp. The Company’s short-term financing bears interest at rates based on the federal funds rate. At December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the weighted average interest rate on borrowings was 5.72 percent and 5.55 percent, respectively. At December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, no formal compensating bal- ance agreements existed, and the Company was in compliance with all debt covenants related to these facilities. Note 15 Contingencies, Commitments and Guarantees arbitration and regulatory proceedings and other fac- tors, the amounts of reserves are difficult to determine and of necessity subject to future revision. Subject to the foregoing, management of the Company believes, based on its current knowledge, after consultation with outside legal counsel and after taking into account its established reserves, the U.S. Bancorp indemnity agree- ment and the assumption by UBS of certain liabilities of the PCS business, that pending legal actions, investiga- tions and proceedings will be resolved with no material adverse effect on the consolidated financial condition of the Company. However, if during any period a potential adverse contingency should become probable or resolved for an amount in excess of the established reserves, U.S. Bancorp indemnification and/or the assumption obligation of UBS, the results of operations in that period could be materially adversely affected. Litigation-related expenses charged to continuing oper- ations included within other operating expenses were a positive benefit of $21.4 million, expense of $3.5 mil- lion, and expense of $3.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Lit- igation-related expenses in 2006 were a positive benefit of $21.4 million due to a reduction of a litigation reserve related to developments in a specific indus- try-wide litigation matter in which the Company, along with other leading securities firms, is a defendant. CONTRACTUAL COMMITMENTS The Company leases office space throughout the United States and in a limited number of foreign coun- tries where the Company’s international operations reside. The Company’s only material lease is for its located in Minneapolis, corporate headquarters In the normal course of business, the Company main- tains contingency reserves and enters into various com- mitments and guarantees, the most significant of which are as follows: LEGAL CONTINGENCIES The Company has been named as a defendant in various legal proceedings arising primarily from securities bro- kerage and investment banking activities, including cer- tain class actions that primarily allege violations of securities laws and seek unspecified damages, which could be substantial. Also, the Company is involved from time to time in investigations and proceedings by governmental agencies and self-regulatory organizations. The Company has established reserves for potential losses that are probable and reasonably estimable that may result from pending and potential complaints, legal actions, investigations and proceedings. In addi- tion to the Company’s established reserves, U.S. Ban- corp has agreed to indemnify the Company in an amount up to $17.5 million for certain legal and reg- ulatory matters. Approximately $13.2 million of this amount remained available as of December 31, 2006. As part of the asset purchase agreement between UBS and the Company for the sale of the PCS branch net- work, UBS agreed to assume certain liabilities of the PCS business, including certain liabilities and obligations arising from litigation, arbitration, customer complaints and other claims related to the PCS business. In certain cases we have agreed to indemnify UBS for litigation matters after UBS has incurred costs of $6.0 million related to these matters. In addition, we have retained liabilities arising from regulatory matters and certain litigation relating to the PCS business prior to the sale. The amount of loss in excess of the $6.0 million indem- nification threshold and for other PCS litigation matters deemed to be probable and reasonably estimable are included in the Company’s established reserves. Adjust- ment to litigation reserves for matters pertaining to the PCS business are included within discontinued opera- tions on the consolidated statements of operations. Given uncertainties regarding the timing, scope, vol- ume and outcome of pending and potential litigation, Piper Jaffray Annual Report 2006 47 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Minnesota. Aggregate minimum lease commitments under operating leases as of December 31, 2006 are as follows: Accordingly, no liability is recorded in the consolidated financial statements for these arrangements. (Amounts in thousands) 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Thereafter $12,733 14,567 15,093 14,209 11,460 28,402 $96,464 Total minimum rentals to be received in the future under noncancelable subleases were $13.3 million at December 31, 2006. including operating costs and real Rental expense, estate taxes, charged to continuing operations was $13.7 million, $13.5 million and $12.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. VENTURE CAPITAL COMMITMENTS As of December 31, 2006, the Company had commit- ments to invest approximately $5.9 million in limited partnerships that make private equity investments. The commitments will be funded, if called, through the end of the respective investment periods ranging from 2007 to 2011. OTHER COMMITMENTS The Company is a member of numerous exchanges and clearinghouses. Under the membership agreements with these entities, members generally are required to guarantee the performance of other members, and if a member becomes unable to satisfy its obligations to the clearinghouse, other members would be required to meet shortfalls. To mitigate these performance risks, the exchanges and clearinghouses often require mem- bers to post collateral. The Company’s maximum potential liability under these arrangements cannot be quantified. However, management believes the like- lihood that the Company would be required to make remote. payments under these arrangements is REIMBURSEMENT GUARANTEE The Company has contracted with a major third-party financial institution to act as the liquidity provider for the Company’s tender option bond securitized trusts. The Company has agreed to reimburse this party for any losses associated with providing liquidity to the trusts. The maximum exposure to loss at December 31, 2006 and 2005 was $251.4 million and $270.6 million, respectively, representing the outstanding amount of all trust certificates at those dates. This exposure to loss is mitigated by the underlying bonds in the trusts, which are either AAA or AA rated. These bonds had a market value of approximately $263.8 million and $281.8 mil- lion at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Company believes the likelihood it will be required to fund the reimbursement agreement obligation under any provision of the arrangement is remote, and accordingly, no liability for such guarantee has been recorded in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK The Company provides investment, capital-raising and related services to a diverse group of domestic and foreign customers, including governments, corpora- tions, and institutional and individual investors. The Company’s exposure to credit risk associated with the non-performance of customers in fulfilling their con- tractual obligations pursuant to securities transactions can be directly impacted by volatile securities markets, credit markets and regulatory changes. This exposure is measured on an individual customer basis and on a group basis for customers that share similar attributes. To alleviate the potential for risk concentrations, coun- terparty credit limits have been implemented for certain products and are continually monitored in light of changing customer and market conditions. As of December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company did not have significant concentrations of credit risk with any one customer or counterparty, or any group of custom- ers or counterparties. Note 16 Restructuring The Company has incurred pre-tax restructuring costs of $60.7 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2006 in connection with the sale of the Company’s PCS branch network to UBS. The expense was incurred upon implementation of a spe- cific restructuring plan to reorganize the Company’s support infrastructure as a result of the sale. The components of this charge are shown below: (Amounts in thousands) Severance and employee-related Lease terminations and asset write-downs Contract termination costs Total $23,063 26,484 11,177 $60,724 48 Piper Jaffray Annual Report 2006 The restructuring charges include the cost of severance, benefits, outplacement costs and equity award acceler- ated vesting costs associated with the termination of employees. The severance amounts were determined based on a one-time severance benefit enhancement to the Company’s existing severance pay program in place at the time of termination notification and will be paid out over a benefit period of up to one year from the time of termination. Approximately 275 employees have received a severance package. In addition, the Company has incurred restructuring charges for contract termina- tion costs related to the reduction of office space and the modification of technology contracts. Contract termi- nation fees are determined based on the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities,” which among other things requires the rec- ognition of a liability for contract termination under a cease-use date concept. The Company also incurred restructuring charges for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets determined in accordance with SFAS 144. All restructuring costs related to the sale of the PCS branch network are included within discontin- ued operations in accordance with SFAS 144. The Company incurred a pre-tax restructuring-related expense of $8.6 million in 2005. The expense was incurred to restructure the Company’s operations as a means to better align its cost infrastructure with its revenues. The Company determined restructuring charges and related accruals based on a specific for- mulated plan. The components of this charge are shown below: (Amounts in thousands) Severance and employee-related Lease terminations and asset write-downs Total $4,886 3,709 $8,595 Note 17 Shareholders’ Equity for provides The certificate of incorporation of Piper Jaffray Com- panies to the 100,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.01 per share and up to 5,000,000 shares of undesignated preferred stock with a par value of $0.01 per share. issuance up of COMMON STOCK The holders of Piper Jaffray Companies common stock are entitled to one vote per share on all matters to be voted upon by the shareholders. Subject to preferences that may be applicable to any outstanding preferred Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Severance and employee-related charges included the cost of severance, other benefits and outplacement costs associated with the termination of employees. The severance amounts were determined based on the Company’s severance pay program in place at the time of termination. Approximately 100 employees received severance. Lease terminations and asset write-downs represented costs associated with redundant office space and equip- ment disposed of as part of the restructuring plan. Payments related to terminated lease contracts con- tinue through the original terms of the leases, which run for various periods, with the longest lease term running through 2014. The following table presents a summary of activity with respect to the restructuring-related liabilities included in other liabilities and accrued expense on the state- ment of financial condition. (Amounts in thousands) 2005 Restructure PCS Restructure Balance at December 31, 2004 $ – $ Provision charged to operating expense Cash outlays Noncash write-downs Balance at December 31, 2005 Provision charged to operating expense Cash outlays Noncash write-downs 8,595 (4,432) (1,138) 3,025 – (1,599) (190) – — – – – 60,724 (28,903) (3,238) Balance at December 31, 2006 $ 1,236 $ 28,583 stock of Piper Jaffray Companies, the holders of its common stock are entitled to receive ratably such div- idends, if any, as may be declared from time to time by the Piper Jaffray Companies board of directors out of funds legally available for that purpose. In the event that Piper Jaffray Companies is liquidated or dissolved, the holders of its common stock are entitled to share ratably in all assets remaining after payment of liabil- ities, subject to any prior distribution rights of Piper Jaffray Companies preferred stock, if any, then out- standing. The holders of the common stock have no preemptive or conversion rights or other subscription Piper Jaffray Annual Report 2006 49 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements rights. There are no redemption or sinking fund pro- visions applicable to Piper Jaffray Companies common stock. Piper Jaffray Companies does not intend to pay cash dividends on its common stock for the foreseeable future. Instead, Piper Jaffray Companies intends to retain all available funds and any future earnings for use in the operation and expansion of its business and to repurchase outstanding common stock to the extent authorized by its board of directors. Additionally, as set forth in Note 21, there are dividend restrictions on Piper Jaffray. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2006, the Company reissued 190,966 common shares out of treasury in fulfillment of $9.0 million in obligations under the Piper Jaffray Companies Retirement Plan. The Company also reissued 76,858 common shares out of treasury as a result of vesting and exercise transac- tions under the Long-Term Incentive Plan. In the third quarter of 2006, the Company entered into an accel- erated share repurchase (“ASR”) agreement with a financial institution pursuant to which the Company repurchased approximately 1.6 million shares of its common stock. Under the agreement, the Company prepaid $100 million to the financial institution, which purchased an equivalent number of shares of the Com- pany’s common stock on an accelerated basis. The number of shares repurchased by the Company was determined based upon the weighted average price of the Company’s common stock over an agreed upon period, subject to a specified collar. Note 18 Earnings Per Share PREFERRED STOCK The Piper Jaffray Companies board of directors has the authority, without action by its shareholders, to desig- nate and issue preferred stock in one or more series and to designate the rights, preferences and privileges of each series, which may be greater than the rights asso- ciated with the common stock. It is not possible to state the actual effect of the issuance of any shares of pre- ferred stock upon the rights of holders of common stock until the Piper Jaffray Companies board of direc- tors determines the specific rights of the holders of preferred stock. However, the effects might include, among other things, the following: restricting divi- dends on its common stock, diluting the voting power of its common stock, impairing the liquidation rights of its common stock and delaying or preventing a change in control of Piper Jaffray Companies without further action by its shareholders. RIGHTS AGREEMENT Piper Jaffray Companies has adopted a rights agree- ment. The issuance of a share of Piper Jaffray Compa- nies common stock also constitutes the issuance of a preferred stock purchase right associated with such share. These rights are intended to have anti-takeover effects in that the existence of the rights may deter a potential acquirer from making a takeover proposal or a tender offer for Piper Jaffray Companies stock. Basic earnings per common share is computed by divid- ing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per common share is calculated by adjusting the weighted average outstanding shares to assume conversion of all potentially dilutive restricted stock and stock options. The computation of earnings per share is as follows: YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, (Amounts in thousands, except per share data) Net income Shares for basic and diluted calculations: Average shares used in basic computation Stock options Restricted stock Average shares used in diluted computation Earnings per share: Basic Diluted 2006 2005 2004 $235,253 $40,083 $50,348 18,002 89 877 18,968 18,813 4 264 19,333 – 66 19,081 19,399 $ 13.07 $ 12.40 $ 2.13 $ 2.10 $ 2.60 $ 2.60 The Company has excluded 0.6 million and 0.3 million options to purchase shares of common stock from its calculation of diluted earnings per share for the periods ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, as they represented anti-dilutive stock options. There were no anti-dilutive effects for the period ended December 31, 2006. 50 Piper Jaffray Annual Report 2006 Note 19 Employee Benefit Plans The Company has various employee benefit plans, and substantially all employees are covered by at least one plan. The plans include a tax-qualified retirement plan with 401(k) and profit-sharing components, a non- qualified retirement plan, a post-retirement benefit plan, and health and welfare plans. During the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, the Com- pany incurred employee benefit expenses from continu- ing operations of $9.4 million, $10.7 million and $11.9 million, respectively. RETIREMENT PLAN The Piper Jaffray Companies Retirement Plan (“Retire- ment Plan”) has two components: a defined contribu- tion retirement savings plan and a tax-qualified, non- contributory profit-sharing plan. The defined contri- bution retirement savings plan allows qualified employees, at their option, to make contributions through salary deductions under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Employee contributions are 100 percent matched by the Company to a maxi- mum of 4 percent of recognized compensation up to the social security taxable wage base. Although the Com- pany’s matching contribution vests immediately, a par- ticipant must be employed on December 31 to receive that year’s matching contribution. The matching con- tribution can be made in cash or Piper Jaffray Com- panies common stock, in the Company’s discretion. The tax-qualified, non-contributory profit-sharing com- ponent of the Retirement Plan covers substantially all employees. Company profit-sharing contributions are discretionary, subject to some limitations to ensure they qualify as deductions for income tax purposes. Employ- ees are fully vested after five years of service. There was no profit sharing contribution made in 2006. The Com- pany incurred $1.6 million and $3.9 million of continu- ing operations related to profit-sharing contributions in 2005 and 2004, respectively. The profit sharing component of the retirement plan was termi- nated effective January 1, 2007. expense PENSION AND POST-RETIREMENT MEDICAL PLANS Certain employees participate in the Piper Jaffray Com- panies Non-Qualified Retirement Plan, an unfunded, non-qualified cash balance pension plan. The Com- pany froze the plan effective January 1, 2004, thereby eliminating future benefits related to pay increases and excluding new participants from the plan. In 2004, the Company recorded a $1.1 million pre-tax curtailment gain as a result of freezing the plan in accordance with Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 88, “Employers’ Accounting for Settlements and Curtail- ments of Defined Benefit Pension Plans and for Ter- mination Benefits” (“SFAS 88”). Effective for the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company adopted the recognition and disclosure provi- sions of SFAS 158. The adoption of SFAS 158 had no impact on the Company’s pension benefit liabilities and an immaterial impact on the Company’s post-retirement medical benefit liabilities. SFAS 158 required the Company to recognize the funded status of its pension and post-retirement med- ical plans in the consolidated statement of financial condition as of December 31, 2006, with a correspond- ing adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax. Any adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income at adoption represents the net unrecognized actuarial losses and unrecognized prior service costs which were previously netted against each plan’s funded status. Actuarial gains and losses that arise in subsequent periods and are not recognized as net periodic benefit cost in the same periods will be recognized as a component of other comprehensive income. Those amounts will be subsequently recog- nized as a component of net periodic benefit cost on the same basis as the amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income in accordance with SFAS 158. In 2006 and 2005, the Company paid out amounts under the pension plan that exceeded its service and triggered settlement interest cost. These payouts accounting under SFAS 88, which resulted in recogni- tion of pre-tax settlement losses of $2.1 and $1.2 mil- lion in 2006 and 2005, respectively. All employees of the Company who meet defined age and service requirements are eligible to receive post-retirement health care benefits provided under a post-retirement benefit plan established by the Company in 2004. The estimated cost of these retiree health care benefits is accrued during the employees’ active service. In connec- tion with the sale of the Company’s PCS branch network, the Company recognized a $1.9 million curtailment gain within discontinued operations related to the reduction of post-retirement health plan participants. Piper Jaffray Annual Report 2006 51 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements The Company uses a September 30 measurement date for the pension and post-retirement benefit plans. Financial information on changes in benefit obligation, fair value of plan assets and the funded status of the pension and post-retirement benefit plans as of Decem- ber 31, 2006 and 2005, is as follows: (Amounts in thousands) Change in benefit obligation: Pension Benefits Post-retirement Medical Benefits 2006 2005 2006 2005 Benefit obligation, at October 1 of prior year $ 27,550 $ 29,389 $ 2,012 $ 1,687 Service cost Interest cost Plan participants’ contributions Net actuarial loss (gain) Curtailment gain Settlement gain Benefits paid Benefit obligation at September 30 Change in plan assets: Fair value of plan assets at October 1 of prior year Actual return on plan assets Employer contributions Plan participants’ contributions Benefits paid Fair value of plan assets at September 30 Funded status at September 30 Employer fourth quarter contributions Benefits paid in fourth quarter – 1,383 – (172) – (2,170) (14,774) – 1,643 – 1,577 – – (5,059) 295 102 64 (155) (1,750) – (137) 306 99 – (80) – – – $ 11,817 $ 27,550 $ 431 $ 2,012 $ $ – – $ – – 14,774 – (14,774) 5,059 – (5,059) $ – – 74 63 (137) $ – $ – $ – $ – – – – – – $(11,817) $(27,550) $ (431) $(2,012) (226) 809 (529) 1,746 (27) 54 – – Amounts recognized in the consolidated statements of financial condition $(11,234) $(26,333) $ (404) $(2,012) Components of accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss), net of tax: Net actuarial loss Prior service credits Total at December 31 The components of the net periodic benefits costs for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, are as follows: (Amounts in thousands) Service cost Interest cost Expected return on plan assets Amortization of prior service credit Amortization of net loss Net periodic benefit cost SFAS 88 event loss/(gain) Total expense/(benefit) for the year $ $ 980 – 980 $ 3,941 $ – 41 (58) $ N/A N/A $ 3,941 $ (17) $ N/A Pension Benefits Post-retirement Medical Benefits 2006 2005 2004 2006 2005 2004 $ – 1,383 – – 376 $1,759 2,086 $3,845 $ – $ – $ 295 $306 $185 1,643 1,363 – – 395 – (158) 145 102 – (58) 2 99 – (64) 13 66 – (48) 22 $2,038 1,168 $ 1,350 (1,124) $ 341 (1,947) $354 – $225 – $3,206 $ 226 $(1,606) $354 $225 Amortization expense of net actuarial losses expected to be recognized during 2007 is $42,000 and $2,000 for the pension plan and post-retirement medical plan, respectively. In addition, the post-retirement medical plan expects to recognize a credit of $20,000 in 2007 for the amortization of prior service credits. 52 Piper Jaffray Annual Report 2006 The assumptions used in the measurement of the Com- pany’s benefit obligations are as follows: Discount rate used to determine year-end obligation Discount rate used to determine fiscal year expense Expected long-term rate of return on participant balances Rate of compensation increase Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year (pre-medicare/post-medicare) Rate to which the cost trend rate is assumed to decline (the ultimate trend rate) (pre-medicare/post-medicare) Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate (pre-medicare/post-medicare) A one-percentage-point change in the assumed health care cost trend rates would not have a material effect on the Company’s post-retirement benefit obligations or net periodic post-retirement benefit cost. The pension plan and post-retirement medical plan do not have assets and are not funded. Pension and post-retirement Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Pension Benefits 2006 2005 6.25% 5.87% 6.50% N/A 5.85% 6.00% 6.50% N/A 2006 Post-retirement Benefits 2006 6.25% 5.87% N/A N/A 2005 5.85% 6.00% N/A N/A 2005 8%/10% 9%/11% 5.0%/5.0% 5.0%/5.0% 2012/2013 2012/2013 benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, are expected to be paid as follows: (Amounts in thousands) 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 to 2016 Pension Benefits $1,007 907 874 852 834 4,266 $8,740 Post-Retirement Benefits $ 38 36 38 42 50 450 $654 HEALTH AND WELFARE PLANS Company employees who meet certain work schedule and service requirements are eligible to participate in the Company’s health and welfare plans. The Company subsidizes the cost of coverage for employees. The medical plan contains cost-sharing features such as deductibles and coinsurance. Note 20 Stock-Based Compensation and Cash Award Program The Company maintains one stock-based compensa- tion plan, the Piper Jaffray Companies Amended and Restated 2003 Annual and Long-Term Incentive Plan (“Long-Term Incentive Plan”). The plan permits the grant of equity awards, including non-qualified stock options and restricted stock, to the Company’s employ- ees and directors for up to 4.5 million shares of com- mon stock. In 2004, 2005 and 2006, the Company granted shares of restricted stock and options to pur- chase Piper Jaffray Companies common stock to employees and granted options to purchase Piper Jaf- fray Companies common stock to its non-employee directors. The Company believes that such awards help align the interests of employees and directors with those of shareholders and serve as an employee retention tool. The awards granted to employees have three-year cliff vesting periods. The director awards were fully vested upon grant. The maximum term of the stock options granted to employees and directors is ten years. The plan provides for accelerated vesting of option and restricted stock awards if there is a change in control of the Company (as defined in the plan), in the event of a participant’s death, and at the discretion of the compensation committee of the Company’s board of directors. Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for stock-based compensation under the fair value method of accounting as prescribed by SFAS 123, as amended by SFAS 148. As such, the Company recorded stock- based compensation expense in the consolidated Piper Jaffray Annual Report 2006 53 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements statement of operations at fair value, net of estimated forfeitures. Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS 123(R) using the modified prospec- tive transition method. SFAS 123(R) requires all share- including grants of based payments to employees, employee stock options, to be recognized in the statement of operations based on fair value, net of estimated forfeitures. Because the Company histori- cally expensed all equity awards based on the fair value method, net of estimated forfeitures, SFAS 123(R) did not have a material effect on the Company’s measure- stock-based ment or compensation. recognition methods for Employee and director stock options granted prior to January 1, 2006, were expensed by the Company on a straight-line basis over the option vesting period, based on the estimated fair value of the award on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Employee and director stock options granted after January 1, 2006, are expensed by the Company on a straight-line basis over the required service period, based on the estimated fair value of the award on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model. At the time it adopted SFAS 123(R), the Com- pany changed the expensing period from the vesting period to the required service period, which shortened the period over which options are expensed for employ- ees who are retiree-eligible on the date of grant or become retiree-eligible during the vesting period. The number of employees that fell within this category at January 1, 2006 was not material. In accordance with SEC guidelines, the Company did not alter the expense recorded in connection with prior option grants for the change in the expensing period. Employee restricted stock grants prior to January 1, 2006, are amortized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period based on the market price of Piper Jaffray Companies common stock on the date of grant. Restricted stock grants after January 1, 2006, are val- ued at the market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant and amortized on a straight- line basis over the required service period. The majority of the Company’s restricted stock grants provide for continued vesting after termination, so long as the employee does not violate certain post-termination restrictions, as set forth in the award agreements. The Company considers the required service period to be the greater of the vesting period or the post- termination restricted period. The Company believes that the the post-termination restrictions meet SFAS 123(R) definition of a substantive service requirement. 54 Piper Jaffray Annual Report 2006 The Company recorded compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures, within continuing operations of $20.8 million, $13.8 million and $6.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, related to employee stock option and restricted stock grants and $0.3 million in outside ser- vices expense related to director stock option grants for each of the years 2006, 2005, and 2004. The tax benefit related to the total compensation cost for stock-based compensation arrangements totaled $8.1 million, $5.4 million, and $2.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. In connection with the sale of the Company’s PCS branch network, the Company undertook a plan to significantly restructure the Company’s support infra- structure. The Company accelerated the equity award vesting for employees terminated as part of this restruc- turing. The acceleration of equity awards was deemed to be a modification of the awards as defined by SFAS 123(R). For the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company recorded $2.7 million of expense in discontinued operations related to the modification of equity awards to accelerate service vesting. Unvested equity awards related to employees transferring to UBS as part of the PCS sale were canceled. See Notes 4 and 16 for further discussion of the Company’s discontin- ued operations and restructuring activities. The fair value of each stock option is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model using assumptions such as the risk-free interest rate, the dividend yield, the expected volatility and the expected life of the option. The risk-free interest rate assumption is based on the U.S. treasury bill rate with a maturity equal to the expected life of the option. The dividend yield assumption is based on the assumed dividend payout over the expected life of the option. The expected volatility assumption is based on industry comparisons. The Company has only been a publicly traded company for approximately 36 months; there- fore, it does not have sufficient historical data to deter- mine an appropriate expected volatility. The expected life assumption is based on an average of the following two factors: 1) industry comparisons; and 2) the guid- ance provided by the SEC in Staff Accounting Bulle- tin No. 107, (“SAB 107”). SAB 107 allows the use of an “acceptable” methodology under which the Company can take the midpoint of the vesting date and the full contractual term. The following table provides a sum- mary of the valuation assumptions used by the Com- pany to determine the estimated value of stock option grants in Piper Jaffray Companies common stock for the twelve months ended December 31: Weighted average assumptions in option valuation Risk-free interest rates Dividend yield Stock volatility factor Expected life of options (in years) Weighted average fair value of options granted Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 2006 2005 2004 4.64%(1) 0.00%(1) 39.35%(1) 5.53(1) $22.92(1) 3.77% 3.20% 0.00% 0.00% 38.03% 40.00% 5.83 $16.58 5.79 $21.24 (1) 2006 weighted average assumptions exclude the assumptions utilized in equity award modifications related to the sale of the Company’s PCS branch network to aid comparability with the prior years. The following table summarizes the Company’s stock options outstanding for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004: Options Outstanding Weighted Average Exercise Price Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years) Aggregate Intrinsic Value December 31, 2003 Granted Exercised Canceled December 31, 2004 Granted Exercised Canceled December 31, 2005 Granted Exercised Canceled December 31, 2006 Options exercisable at December 31, 2004 Options exercisable at December 31, 2005 Options exercisable at December 31, 2006 Additional information regarding Piper Jaffray Com- panies stock options outstanding as of December 31, 2006 is as follows: Range of Exercise Prices $28.01 $33.40 $39.62 $47.30 - $51.05 $70.65 – 322,005 – (25,975) 296,030 426,352 – (79,350) 643,032 50,560 (31,562) (151,849) 510,181 21,249 54,041 59,623 – $47.49 – 47.30 $47.50 38.78 – 42.91 $42.29 53.16 41.64 42.82 $43.25 $50.13 $37.18 $44.16 9.1 $ 133,214 8.7 $ – 7.8 9.9 8.9 7.9 $11,172,964 $ (206,753) 174,012 $ $ 1,251,487 Options Outstanding Exercisable Options Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years) 8.3 8.6 8.1 7.3 9.3 Weighted Average Exercise Price $28.01 $33.40 $39.62 $47.59 $70.65 Weighted Average Exercise Price $28.01 $33.40 $39.62 $49.82 $70.65 Shares 22,852 4,001 1,793 19,205 11,772 Shares 22,852 4,001 248,636 222,920 11,772 As of December 31, 2006, there was $2.0 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to stock options expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.28 years. Cash received from option exercises for the year ended December 31, 2006 was $1.3 million. The tax benefit realized for the tax deduction from option exercises totaled $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. Piper Jaffray Annual Report 2006 55 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements The following table summarizes the Company’s non- vested restricted stock for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004: December 31, 2003 Granted Vested Canceled December 31, 2004 Granted Vested Canceled December 31, 2005 Granted Vested Canceled December 31, 2006 Nonvested Restricted Stock Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value – $ – 550,659 – (18,774) 531,885 993,919 (482) (107,878) 48.68 – 48.80 $48.68 37.77 48.75 44.23 1,417,444 $41.37 847,669 (68,940) (639,372) 48.35 45.03 44.28 1,556,801 $43.81 As of December 31, 2006, there was $29.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.88 years. The Company has a policy of issuing shares out of treasury (to the extent available) to satisfy share option exercises and restricted stock vesting. The Company expects to withhold approximately 0.1 million shares from employee equity awards vesting in 2007, related to the payment of individual income tax on restricted stock vesting. For accounting purposes, withholding shares to cover employees’ tax obligations is deemed to be a repurchase of shares by the Company. In connection with the Company’s spin-off from U.S. Bancorp on December 31, 2003, the Company established a cash award program pursuant to which it granted cash awards to a broad-based group of employ- ees to aid in retention of employees and to compensate employees for the value of U.S. Bancorp stock options and restricted stock lost by employees. The cash awards are being expensed over a four-year period ending December 31, 2007. Participants must be employed on the date of payment to receive payment under the award. Expense related to the cash award program is included as a separate line item on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. Note 21 Net Capital Requirements and Other Regulatory Matters As a registered broker dealer and member firm of the NYSE, Piper Jaffray is subject to the uniform net capital rule of the SEC and the net capital rule of the NYSE. Piper Jaffray has elected to use the alternative method permitted by the SEC rule, which requires that it main- tain minimum net capital of the greater of $1.0 million or 2 percent of aggregate debit balances arising from customer transactions, as such term is defined in the SEC rule. Under the NYSE rule, the NYSE may prohibit a member firm from expanding its business or paying dividends if resulting net capital would be less than 5 percent of aggregate debit balances. Advances to affiliates, repayment of subordinated debt, dividend payments and other equity withdrawals by Piper Jaf- fray are subject to certain notification and other provisions of the SEC and NYSE rules. In addition, Piper Jaffray is subject to certain notification require- ments related to withdrawals of excess net capital. At December 31, 2006, net capital calculated under the SEC rule was $367.1 million, or 395.3 percent of aggregate debit balances; this amount exceeded the minimum net capital required under the SEC rule by $365.3 million. Piper Jaffray Ltd., which is a registered United King- dom broker dealer, is subject to the capital require- ments of the Financial Services Authority (“FSA”). As of December 31, 2006, Piper Jaffray Ltd. was in com- pliance with the capital requirements of the FSA. 56 Piper Jaffray Annual Report 2006 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 22 Income Taxes Income tax expense is provided using the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between amounts reported for income tax purposes and financial state- ment purposes, using current tax rates. The components of income tax expense from continu- ing operations are as follows: YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, (Amounts in thousands) Current: Federal State Foreign Deferred: Federal State Foreign Total income tax expense A reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax rates to the Company’s effective tax rates for the fiscal years ended December 31, is as follows: (Amounts in Thousands) Federal income tax at statutory rates Increase (reduction) in taxes resulting from: State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit Net tax-exempt interest income Other, net Total income tax expense Income taxes from discontinued operations were $160.7 million, $10.2 million and $12.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. for In accordance with Accounting Principles Bulletin 23, “Accounting Income Taxes-Special Areas,” U.S. income taxes are not provided on undistributed earnings of international subsidiaries that are perma- nently reinvested. As of December 31, 2006, undistrib- uted earnings permanently reinvested in the Company’s foreign subsidiary were approximately $2.1 million. At current tax rates, additional federal income taxes (net of available tax credits) of $.1 million would become payable if such income were to be repatriated. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities reflect the tax effect of temporary differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for the same items for income tax reporting purposes. The net deferred tax asset included in other assets on the consolidated 2006 2005 2004 $25,270 4,560 615 30,445 $10,904 $ 4,577 324 116 1,724 489 11,344 6,790 3,571 578 380 4,529 (2,103) 1,595 27 8,222 1,715 – (481) 9,937 $34,974 $10,863 $16,727 2006 2005 2004 $34,256 $12,611 $17,164 3,340 (3,947) 1,325 1,247 (3,426) 431 2,235 (3,677) 1,005 $34,974 $10,863 $16,727 statements of financial condition consisted of the fol- lowing items at December 31: (Amounts in thousands) Deferred tax assets: Liabilities/accruals not currently deductible Pension and retirement costs Deferred compensation Other Deferred tax liabilities: Firm investments Fixed assets Other 2006 2005 $17,351 5,201 22,574 3,335 $19,205 10,962 15,108 4,406 48,461 49,681 1,228 4,672 498 6,398 440 2,379 270 3,089 Net deferred tax asset $42,063 $46,592 The Company has reviewed the components of the deferred tax assets and has determined that no valua- tion allowance is deemed necessary based on manage- ment’s expectation of future taxable income. Piper Jaffray Annual Report 2006 57 Piper Jaffray Companies SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION Quarterly Information (Unaudited) 2006 FISCAL QUARTER (Amounts in thousands, except per share data) Total revenues Interest expense Net revenues Non-interest expenses Income from continuing operations before income tax expense Net income from continuing operations Income/(loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax Net income Earnings per basic common share Income from continuing operations Income/(loss) from discontinued operations Earnings per basic common share Earnings per diluted common share Income from continuing operations Income/(loss) from discontinued operations Earnings per diluted common share Weighted average number of common shares Basic Diluted 2005 FISCAL QUARTER (Amounts in thousands, except per share data) Total revenues Interest expense Net revenues Non-interest expenses Income/(loss) from continuing operations before income tax expense/(benefit) Net income/(loss) from continuing operations Income from discontinued operations, net of tax Net income Earnings per basic common share Income/(loss) from continuing operations Income from discontinued operations Earnings per basic common share Earnings per diluted common share Income/(loss) from continuing operations Income from discontinued operations Earnings per diluted common share Weighted average number of common shares Basic Diluted First Second Third Fourth $143,112 $114,393 $124,597 $153,135 8,153 134,959 106,274 28,685 18,706 5,151 9,143 105,250 93,091 12,159 7,929 (3,792) $ 23,857 $ 4,137 8,490 116,107 101,058 15,049 9,528 177,085(1) $186,613 6,517 146,618 104,638(2) 41,980 26,736(2) (6,090) $ 20,646 $ $ $ $ 1.01 0.28 1.29 0.98 0.27 1.25 $ $ $ $ 0.43 $ (0.20) 0.53 9.82(1) 0.22 $ 10.35 0.40 (0.19) 0.21 $ $ 0.50 9.29(1) 9.79 $ $ $ $ 1.58(2) (0.36) 1.22 1.49(2) (0.34) 1.15 18,462 19,146 18,556 19,669 18,031 19,071 16,973 18,004 First Second Third Fourth $95,696 7,359 $102,141 7,909 $128,189 8,064 $127,776 9,162 88,337 83,201 5,136 3,403 3,932 $ 7,335 $ 0.18 0.20 $ 0.38 $ 0.17 0.20 $ 0.38 94,232 96,090(3) (1,858) (1,108)(3) 2,345 $ 1,237 120,125 104,316 15,809 10,938 118,614 101,670 16,944 11,935 4,210 $ 15,148 4,428 $ 16,363 $ $ $ $ (0.06)(3) $ 0.12 0.58 0.22 0.07 $ 0.80 (0.06)(3) $ 0.12 0.57 0.22 0.06 $ 0.79 $ $ $ $ 0.65 0.24 0.89 0.63 0.23 0.87 19,378 19,523 19,028 19,195 18,841 19,107 18,365 18,850 (1) The third quarter of 2006 included the gain on the sale of the Company’s PCS branch network. (2) The fourth quarter of 2006 included an after tax reduction of litigation reserves of $13,100 or $0.73 per diluted share. (3) The second quarter of 2005 included a pre-tax restructuring charge of $8,595 or $0.29 per diluted share after tax. 58 Piper Jaffray Annual Report 2006 Market for Piper Jaffray Companies Common Stock and Related Shareholder Matters Piper Jaffray Companies SHAREHOLDERS We had 20,660 shareholders of record and an estimated 98,590 beneficial owners of our common stock as of February 23, 2007. DIVIDENDS We do not intend to pay cash dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future. Our board of directors is free to change our dividend policy at any time. Restrictions on our broker dealer subsidiary’s ability to pay dividends are described in Note 21 to the con- solidated financial statements. STOCK PRICE INFORMATION Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “PJC.” The following table contains historical quarterly price information for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005. On Febru- ary 23, 2007, the last reported sale price of our com- mon stock was $68.77. 2006 FISCAL YEAR First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter 2005 FISCAL YEAR First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter High Low $55.40 $38.74 74.65 66.80 71.61 53.18 46.60 58.80 High Low $47.18 $36.59 37.67 35.00 41.12 26.40 29.00 28.56 Piper Jaffray Annual Report 2006 59 Piper Jaffray Companies Stock Performance Graph The following graph compares the performance of an investment in our common stock from January 2, 2004, the date our common stock began regular-way trading on the New York Stock Exchange following our spin-off from U.S. Bancorp, with the S&P 500 Index and the S&P 500 Diversified Financials Index. The graph assumes $100 was invested on January 2, 2004, in each of our common stock, the S&P 500 Index and the S&P 500 Diversified Financials Index and that all dividends were reinvested on the date of payment without payment of any commissions. Dollar amounts in the graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar. Based on these assumptions, the cumulative total return for 2006 would have been $151.51 for our common stock, $135.12 for the S&P 500 Index and $147.74 for the S&P 500 Diversified Financials Index. For 2005, the cumulative total return would have been $93.95 for our common stock, $116.69 for the S&P 500 Index and $119.24 for the S&P 500 Diversified Financials Index. For 2004, the cumulative total return would have been $111.51 for our common stock, $111.23 for the S&P 500 Index and $108.59 for the S&P 500 Diversified Financials Index. The performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance. CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN PIPER JAFFRAY COMMON STOCK, THE S & P 500 INDEX AND THE S & P 500 DIVERSIFIED FINANCIALS INDEX $130 $120 $110 $100 $90 $80 $70 $60 1/02/04 3/31/04 6/30/04 9/30/04 12/31/04 3/31/05 6/30/05 9/30/05 12/31/05 3/31/06 6/30/06 9/30/06 12/31/06 PJC S&P 500 S&P 500 Diversified Financials 60 Piper Jaffray Annual Report 2006 Corporate Headquarters Piper Jaffray Companies Mail Stop J09N05 800 Nicollet Mall, Suite 800 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612 303-6000 Company Web Site www.piperjaffray.com Stock Transfer Agent and Registrar Mellon Investor Services LLC acts as transfer agent and registrar for Piper Jaffray Companies and maintains all shareholder records for the company. For questions regarding owned Piper Jaffray Companies stock, stock transfers, address corrections or changes, lost stock certiﬁcates or duplicate mailings, please contact Mellon Investor Services by writing or calling: Mellon Investor Services LLC P.O. Box 3315 South Hackensack, NJ 07606 800 872-4409 Street Address for Overnight Deliveries: 480 Washington Blvd. Jersey City, NJ 07310-1900 Web Site Access to Registrar Shareholders may access their investor statements online 24 hours a day, seven days a week with MLinkSM; for more information, go to www.melloninvestor.com/ISD. E-mail Delivery of Shareholder Materials Piper Jaffray invites its shareholders to join in its commitment to being an environmentally responsible corporation by receiving future shareholder materials electronically. Registered shareholders may sign up for electronic delivery of future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports by accessing the Web site, www.proxyvote.com, and following the instructions to vote. After you have voted your proxy, you will be prompted regarding electronic delivery. Electronic delivery will help Piper Jaffray reduce paper waste and minimize printing and postage costs. This book was printed on recycled paper that contains post-consumer waste. Independent Accountants Ernst & Young LLP Common Stock Listing New York Stock Exchange (symbol: PJC) Investor Inquiries Shareholders, securities analysts and investors seeking more information about the company should contact Jennifer A. Olson- Goude, director of Investor Relations, at jennifer.a.olson-goude@pjc.com, 612 303-6277, or the corporate headquarters address. Web Site Access to SEC Reports and Corporate Governance Information Piper Jaffray Companies makes available free of charge on its Web site, www.piperjaffray.com, its annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports ﬁled or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, as well as all other reports ﬁled by Piper Jaffray Companies with the SEC, as soon as reasonably practicable after it electronically ﬁles them with, or furnishes them to, the SEC. Piper Jaffray Companies also makes available free of charge on its Web site the company’s codes of ethics and business conduct, its corporate governance principles and the charters of the audit, compensation, and nominating and governance committees of the board of directors. Printed copies of these materials will be mailed upon request. Dividends Piper Jaffray Companies does not currently pay cash dividends on its common stock. Certiﬁcations The certiﬁcations by the chief executive ofﬁcer and chief ﬁnancial ofﬁcer of Piper Jaffray Companies required under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 have been ﬁled as exhibits to its 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The certiﬁcation by the chief executive ofﬁcer of Piper Jaffray Companies required under Section 303A.12(a) of the corporate governance rules of the New York Stock Exchange has been submitted to the New York Stock Exchange.

Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above