PotlatchDeltic
Annual Report 2017

Plain-text annual report

FINANCIAL INFORMATION Dollars in thousands (except per-share amounts) 2017 2016 2015 Revenues Net income Total assets Long-term debt (including current portion) Total stockholders’ equity $ 678,595 $ 599,099 $ 575,336 86,453 10,938 31,714 953,079 573,319 200,542 927,681 583,988 156,274 1,016,612 603,881 203,736 Capital expenditures, excluding timber and timberland acquisitions: Property, plant and equipment Timberlands reforestation and roads Total capital expenditures 12,855 15,207 28,062 5,866 13,422 19,288 18,987 13,745 32,732 Net income per share: Basic Diluted Dividends per share $ $ 2.12 2.10 1.525 $ 0.27 0.27 1.50 0.78 0.77 1.50 Weighted-average shares outstanding (in thousands): Basic Diluted 40,824 41,227 40,798 41,033 40,842 40,988 Potlatch is a Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) with approximately 1.4 million acres of timberland in Alabama, Arkansas, Idaho, Minnesota and Mississippi. Potlatch, a certified forest practices leader, is committed to providing superior returns to stockholders through long-term stewardship of its forest resources. The company also conducts a land sales and development business and operates wood products manufacturing facilities through its taxable REIT subsidiary. More information about Potlatch can be found on the company’s website at www.potlatchcorp.com. UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 Form 10-K (Mark One) (cid:3) ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 (cid:4) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission File Number 1-32729 POTLATCH CORPORATION (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) 601 West 1st Ave., Suite 1600 Spokane, Washington (Address of principal executive offices) 82-0156045 (IRS Employer Identification No.) 99201 (Zip Code) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (509) 835-1500 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: TITLE OF EACH CLASS Common Stock ($1 par value) NAME OF EACH EXCHANGE ON WHICH REGISTERED The Nasdaq Global Select Market Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. (cid:3) Yes (cid:4) No Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act (cid:4) Yes (cid:3) No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. (cid:3)Yes (cid:4) No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). (cid:3) Yes (cid:4) No Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. (cid:3) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Large accelerated filer (cid:3) Accelerated filer (cid:4) Non-accelerated filer (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) (cid:4) Smaller reporting company (cid:4) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). (cid:4) Yes (cid:3) No The aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant at June 30, 2017, was approximately $1,855.9 million, based on the closing price of $45.70. As of January 31, 2018, 40,611,991 shares of the registrant's common stock, par value $1 per share, were outstanding. Portions of the definitive proxy statement for the 2018 annual meeting of stockholders expected to be filed with the Commission on or about March 30, 2018 are incorporated by reference in Part III hereof. DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE POTLATCH CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES Table of Contents BUSINESS PART I ITEM 1. ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS ITEM 2. ITEM 3. ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES PROPERTIES LEGAL PROCEEDINGS PART II ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES ITEM 6. ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA RESULTS OF OPERATIONS ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA Consolidated Statements of Income Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income Consolidated Balance Sheets Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION PART III ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES PART IV ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES SIGNATURES PAGE NUMBER 4 11 23 23 23 23 24 27 28 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 73 73 73 76 77 77 77 77 78 82 EXPLANATORY NOTE For purposes of this report, any references to "the company,” “us,” “we” and “our” include Potlatch Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries. CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION This report contains, in addition to historical information, certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including without limitation, statements regarding: • • • • • • • • • • • • • timber inventory; lumber demand and pricing in North America in 2018; increased North American housing starts and repair and remodel activity; expected improvements in U.S. economic growth due to the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act; decreased Asian demand for North American lumber; excess log supply in the South; the expected positive effect on timber prices of increased lumber demand and higher lumber prices; expected sawlog prices in 2018; expected 2018 timber harvest of approximately 4.1 million tons; expected sale of 35% of timber volume under log supply agreements in 2018; expected sales of 45,000 acres of higher and better use (HBU) property, 95,000 acres of rural real estate property and 50,000 acres of non-strategic timberland over the next decade or more; funding of our dividends in 2018; compliance with REIT tax rules; • Forest Stewardship Council® (FSC®) and Sustainable Forest Initiative® (SFI®) certification of our timberlands; • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • expectations regarding premium prices for FSC®-certified logs and FSC®-certified lumber; realization of deferred tax assets; expected closing of the merger of Potlatch and Deltic; expected issuance of Potlatch stock in connection with the closing of the merger with Deltic; expected merger costs; proposed impact of the merger on Potlatch’s financial results; estimated distribution of Deltic’s accumulated earnings and profits; integration of Deltic’s operations; expected capital expenditures in the first quarter of 2018; expectations regarding funding of our pension plans in 2018 and over the next 7 years; estimated non-qualified pension plan payments in 2018; estimated future benefit payments; estimated future payments under operating leases; estimated long-term rate of return on pension assets and discount rate; estimated future debt payments; expectations regarding the effect of ASU No. 2014-9, ASU No. 2016-02, ASU No. 2016-09 and ASU No. 2016-13; and 1 • expected liquidity in 2018 to fund our operations, regular stockholder dividends, capital expenditures and debt service obligations and related matters. Words such as “anticipate,” “expect,” “will,” “intend,” “plan,” “target,” “project,” “believe,” “seek,” “schedule,” “estimate,” “could,” “can,” “may” and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements reflect our current views regarding future events based on estimates and assumptions and are therefore subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties and are not guarantees of future performance. Our actual results of operations could differ materially from our historical results or those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements contained in this report. Important factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, the following: • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • changes in timber growth rates; changes in silviculture; timber cruising variables; changes in state forest acts or best management practices; changes in timber harvest levels on our lands; changes in timber prices; changes in timberland values; changes in policy regarding governmental timber sales; changes in the United States and international economies; changes in interest rates and discount rates; changes in exchange rates; changes in requirements for FSC® or SFI® certification; changes in the level of residential and commercial construction and remodeling activity; changes in tariffs, quotas and trade agreements involving wood products; changes in demand for our products; changes in production and production capacity in the forest products industry; competitive pricing pressures for our products; unanticipated manufacturing disruptions; changes in general and industry-specific environmental laws and regulations; unforeseen environmental liabilities or expenditures; • weather conditions; • • • • • • • changes in raw material and other costs; collectability of amounts owed by customers; changes in federal and state tax laws; the ability to satisfy complex rules in order to remain qualified as a REIT; changes in tax laws that could reduce the benefits associated with REIT status; the company’s ability to consummate the merger with Deltic or satisfy the conditions to the completion of the transaction, including the receipt of stockholder approvals; the company’s ability to meet expectations regarding the timing, completion and accounting and tax treatments of the merger transaction; 2 • • • • • • • • the possibility that any of the anticipated benefits of the proposed merger will not be realized or will not be realized within the expected time period; the risk that integration of Deltic’s operations with those of Potlatch will be materially delayed or will be more costly or difficult than expected; the failure of the proposed merger to close for any other reason; the effect of the announcement of the merger on customer relationships and operating results (including without limitation, difficulties in maintaining relationships with employees or customers); dilution caused by Potlatch’s issuance of additional shares of its common stock in connection with the merger; the possibility that the merger may be more expensive to complete than anticipated, including as a result of unexpected factors or events; the diversion of management’s time on transaction related issues; and the estimation of Deltic’s accumulated earnings and profits is preliminary and may change with further due diligence. For a discussion of some of the factors that may affect our business, results and prospects, see Part 1 - Item 1A. Risk Factors. Forward-looking statements contained in this report present our views only as of the date of this report. Except as required under applicable law, we do not intend to issue updates concerning any future revisions of our views to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this report. 3 Part I ITEM 1. BUSINESS General Potlatch Corporation, formerly known as Potlatch Holdings, Inc., was incorporated in Delaware in September 2005 to facilitate a restructuring to qualify for treatment as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. It is the successor to the business of the original Potlatch Corporation, which was incorporated in Maine in 1903. We are focused on the ownership of timberland, which we view as a unique and attractive asset due to the renewable nature of timber resources and timber’s long-term history of price appreciation in excess of inflation. Our primary objectives include using our timberland investments to generate income and maximizing the long-term value of our assets. We pursue these objectives by adhering to the following strategies: • Managing our timberlands to improve their long-term sustainable yield. We manage our timberlands in a manner designed to optimize the balance among timber growth, prudent environmental management and current cash flow, in order to achieve increasing levels of sustainable yield over the long-term. We may choose to harvest timber at levels above or below our current estimate of sustainability for short periods of time, for the purpose of improving the long-term productivity of certain timber stands or in response to market conditions. In addition, we focus on optimizing timber returns by continually improving productivity and yields through advanced silvicultural practices that take into account soil, climate and biological considerations. • Pursuing attractive acquisitions. We actively pursue timberland acquisitions that meet our financial and strategic criteria. The critical elements of our acquisition strategy generally include acquiring properties that complement our existing land base, are cash flow accretive and have attractive timber or higher and better use (HBU) values. • Maximizing the value of our timberland real estate. A portion of our acreage is more valuable for recreational purposes or to other timberland or real estate investors. We continually assess the potential uses of our lands and manage them proactively for the highest value. We have identified approximately 14% of our timberlands as having values that are potentially greater than timberland values. • Practicing sound environmental stewardship. We pursue a program of environmental stewardship and active involvement in federal, state and local policymaking to maximize our assets’ long-term value. We manage our timberlands in a manner consistent with the principles set forth by SFI® or FSC®. Our businesses are organized into three operating segments: • Resource: Our Resource segment manages our timberlands to optimize revenue producing opportunities while adhering to our strict stewardship standards. Management activities include planting and harvesting trees and building and maintaining roads. The Resource segment also generates revenues from activities such as hunting leases, recreation permits and leases, mineral rights leases, biomass production and carbon sequestration. • Wood Products: Our Wood Products segment manufactures and sells lumber, plywood and residual products. • Real Estate: Our Real Estate segment consists primarily of sales of real property deemed non-strategic or identified as having higher and better use alternatives. The Real Estate segment engages in real estate sales and limited subdivision activity through Potlatch’s taxable REIT subsidiaries (Potlatch TRS). Additional information regarding each of our operating segments is included in this section, as well as in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Note 17: Segment Information in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. 4 Effective January 1, 2006, we restructured our operations to qualify for treatment as a REIT. As a REIT, we generally are not subject to federal and state corporate income taxes on our income from investments in real estate that we distribute to our stockholders, including the income derived from the sale of standing timber. As of January 1, 2016, we are no longer subject to corporate taxes on certain built-in gains, the excess of fair market value over tax basis, on sales of real property held by the REIT at the time of our conversion. We are required to pay federal corporate income taxes on income from our non-real estate investments, principally the operations of Potlatch TRS. Pending Merger with Deltic On October 22, 2017, Potlatch and Deltic Timber Corporation (Deltic) entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (Merger Agreement) pursuant to which Deltic will merge with and into a wholly-owned subsidiary of Potlatch (Merger Sub). Deltic owns approximately 530,000 acres of timberland, operates two sawmills and a medium density fiberboard plant and is engaged in real estate development primarily in Arkansas. The combined company will be named PotlatchDeltic Corporation. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, Deltic shareholders will receive 1.80 shares of Potlatch common stock for each share of Deltic common stock at the closing date. We have estimated the total consideration expected to be issued to Deltic shareholders in the merger to be approximately 22 million shares of our common stock based on the 1.80 exchange ratio and the number of Deltic shares outstanding. Because the market value of our common stock will continue to fluctuate and the number of shares to be issued with respect to Deltic stock awards will not be determinable until the closing of the transaction, the total value of the consideration exchanged will not be determinable until the closing date. During 2018, subsequent to the completion of the transaction, as part of the REIT conversion process, Deltic’s earnings and profits, estimated to be $250 million, will be distributed to shareholders of the combined company through a dividend consisting of 80% stock and 20% cash. The closing of the merger is subject to approval by the shareholders of Deltic and Potlatch and other conditions specified in the Merger Agreement. The respective shareholder meetings are scheduled for February 20, 2018, as published in the joint proxy statement/prospectus dated January 18, 2018. If approved by the shareholders at their respective meetings, the merger is expected to close the same day. Available Information We make our periodic and current reports that we file with, or furnish to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) available on or through our website, www.potlatchcorp.com (under “Investor Resources – Financial Information”), at no charge as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file the information with, or furnish it to, the SEC. Information on our website is not part of this report. In addition, the reports and materials that we file with the SEC are available at the SEC’s website (www.sec.gov) and at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington DC 20549. Interested parties may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Business Segments Resource Segment Industry Background. The demand for timber depends primarily upon the markets for wood related products, including lumber, panel products, paper and other pulp-based products. The end uses for timber vary widely, depending on species, size and quality. Historically, timber demand has experienced cyclical fluctuations, although sometimes at different times and rates for products or geographic regions. The demand for sawlogs, lumber and other manufactured wood products is significantly dependent upon the level of new residential construction and remodeling activity, which, in turn, is affected by general economic and demographic factors, including population growth, new household formations, interest rates for home mortgages and construction loans and credit availability. Increases in residential construction and remodeling activities are generally followed by higher lumber prices, which are usually followed by higher log prices. The demand for pulpwood is dependent on the paper and pulp-based manufacturing industries. Both pulpwood and sawlogs are affected by domestic and international economic conditions, global population growth and other demographic factors, industry capacity and 5 the value of the U.S. dollar in relation to foreign currencies. Locally, timber demand also fluctuates due to the expansion or closure of individual wood products and pulp-based manufacturing facilities. Timber supplies can fluctuate depending upon factors such as changes in weather conditions and harvest strategies, as well as occasionally high timber salvage efforts due to storm damage, unusual pest infestations such as the mountain pine beetle, or fires. Local timber supplies also change in response to prevailing timber prices. Rising timber prices often lead to increased harvesting on private timberlands, including lands not previously made available for commercial timber operations. The supply of timber generally is adequate to meet demand, although this could tighten in the event of higher demand due to increased U.S. housing starts, increased log and lumber exports and the impacts from a natural disaster, such as fire, hurricane, earthquake, insect infestation, drought, disease, ice storms, windstorms, flooding or other factors. Timberland Sale. On April 21, 2016, we sold approximately 172,000 acres of timberlands located in central Idaho for $114 million. We purchased the property in 2007 and 2008 for the purpose of growing and harvesting timber and selling rural recreational parcels. The sale freed up capital without having to wait for the rural recreational real estate market in central Idaho to recover. Historical earnings generated by the property were positive, but not material. Ownership. The Resource segment manages approximately 1.4 million acres of timberlands including approximately 19,000 acres under long-term leases. We are the largest private landowner in Idaho. The following table provides additional information about our timberlands. (Acres in thousands) Region State Northern region Idaho Variety of commercially viable softwood species, such as grand fir, Douglas fir and inland red cedar Description Acres Minnesota Primarily pine, aspen and hardwoods Total Northern region Southern regio n Alabama Primarily southern yellow pine and hardwoods Arkansas Mississippi Primarily southern yellow pine and hardwoods Primarily southern yellow pine and hardwoods Total Southern region Total 629 144 773 94 410 97 601 1,374 Operation. The primary business of the Resource segment is the management of our timberlands to optimize the value of all possible revenue producing opportunities while adhering to our strict stewardship standards. Management activities include planting and harvesting trees and building and maintaining roads. The segment also generates revenue from non-timber resources such as from hunting leases, recreation permits and leases, mineral rights leases, biomass production and carbon sequestration. We strive to maximize cash flow while managing our timberlands sustainably over the long-term. From time to time, we may choose, within the parameters of our environmental commitments, to harvest timber at levels above or below our estimate of sustainability for short periods in order to take advantage of strong demand or to adjust to weak demand. To maximize our timberlands' long-term value, we manage them intensively, based upon timber species and local growing conditions. Our harvest plans take into account changing market conditions, are designed to contribute to the growth of the remaining timber and reflect our policy of environmental stewardship. We reforest our acreage in a timely fashion to enhance its long-term value. We employ silvicultural techniques to improve timber growth rates, including vegetation control, fertilization and thinning. In deciding whether to implement any silvicultural practice, we analyze the associated costs and long-term benefits, with the goal of achieving an attractive return over time. Inventory. At the end of 2017, our estimated standing merchantable timber inventory was 64 million tons, including 35 million tons in the North and 29 million tons in the South. At the end of 2016, our estimated standing merchantable timber inventory was 62 million tons. The aggregate estimated volume of current standing merchantable timber inventory is updated annually to reflect increases due to reclassification of young growth to merchantable timber when the young growth meets defined 6 diameter specifications, the annual growth rates of merchantable timber and the acquisition of additional merchantable timber and to reflect decreases due to timber harvests and land sales. This estimate is derived using methods consistent with industry practice and is based on statistical methods and field sampling. The estimated inventory volume includes timber in environmentally sensitive areas where the timberlands are managed in a manner consistent with best management practices, state forest practice acts and the SFI® or FSC® forest management standards. Timber volumes are estimated from cruises of the timber tracts, which are generally completed on a five to ten year cycle. Since the individual cruises collect field data at different times for specific sites, the growth model projects standing inventory from the cruise date to a common reporting date. Annual growth rates for the merchantable inventory have historically been in the range of 2% to 5% in the North and 6% to 9% in the South. Harvest. Our short-term and long-term harvest plans are critical factors in our long-term management process. Each year, we prepare a harvest plan designating the timber tracts and volumes to be harvested during that particular year. Each harvest plan reflects our analysis of the age, size and species distribution of our timber, as well as our expectations about harvest methods, growth rates, the volume of each species to be harvested, anticipated acquisitions and dispositions, thinning operations, regulatory constraints and other relevant information. Among other things, the optimal harvest cycles, or rotations, for timber vary by location and species and tend to change over time as a result of silvicultural advances, changes in the markets for different sizes and ages of timber and other factors. Since harvest plans are based on projections of weather, timber growth rates, regulatory constraints and other assumptions, many of which are beyond our control, there can be no assurance that we will be able to harvest the volumes projected or the specific timber stands designated in our harvest plans. Detailed harvest information by region and product is presented in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. The following table presents a summary of our total 2017 timber harvest by region. (Tons in thousands) Northern region Southern region Total Sawlogs Timber Harvested Pulpwood Stumpage Total 1,712 933 2,645 146 1,169 1,315 12 41 53 1,870 2,143 4,013 Based on our current projections, which are based on constant timberland holdings (without including additional timberlands from the pending merger with Deltic) and that take into consideration such factors as market conditions, the ages of our timber stands and recent timberland sales and acquisitions, we expect to harvest approximately 4.1 million tons in 2018. The Resource segment sells a portion of its logs at market prices to our wood products manufacturing facilities. Intersegment sales to our wood products manufacturing facilities in 2017 were 26% of our total Resource segment revenues. The segment also sells sawlogs and pulpwood to a variety of forest products companies located near our timberlands. The segment’s customers range in size from small operators to multinational corporations. Idaho Forest Group, LLC operates five sawmills in Idaho and represented slightly more than 10% of our consolidated revenues in 2017, 2016 and 2015. The segment competes with owners of timberlands that operate in areas near our timberlands, ranging from private owners of small tracts of land to some of the largest timberland companies in the United States. The segment competes principally on the basis of distance to market, price, log quality and customer service. In 2017, approximately 35% of our harvest volumes were sold under log supply agreements. We expect approximately the same amount to be sold under log supply agreements in 2018. In general, our log supply agreements require a specified volume of timber to be delivered to defined customer facilities at prices that are adjusted periodically to reflect market conditions. Prices in our Northern region contracts are adjusted periodically by species to prevailing market prices for logs, lumber, wood chips and other residuals. Prices in our Southern region contracts are adjusted every three months based on prevailing market prices for logs. Currently, our log supply agreements are in place for one to five years. Other. Our timberlands include a wide diversity of softwood and hardwood species and are certified to either the SFI® or FSC® standards. We adhere to principles that include commitments to sustainable forestry, responsible practices, forest health and productivity and protection of special sites. We are generally able to realize price premiums for pulpwood from our FSC®-certified lands. 7 Our operations are subject to numerous federal, state and local laws and regulations, including those relating to the environment, endangered species, our forestry activities and health and safety. Due to the significance of regulation to our business, we integrate wildlife, habitat and watershed management into our resource management practices. We also take an active approach to regulatory developments by participating in standard- setting where possible. We work cooperatively with regulators to create voluntary conservation plans that address environmental concerns while preserving our ability to operate our timberlands efficiently. Despite our active participation in governmental policymaking and regulatory standard-setting, there can be no assurance that endangered species, environmental and other laws will not restrict our operations or impose significant costs, damages, penalties or liabilities on us. In particular, we anticipate that endangered species and environmental laws will generally become increasingly stringent. The volume and value of timber that can be harvested from our lands may be affected by natural disasters such as fire, insect infestation, disease, ice storms, hurricanes, wind storms, floods and other weather conditions and causes. We assume substantially all risk of loss to the standing timber we own from fire and other hazards, consistent with industry practice in the United States, because insuring for such losses is not practicable. Wood Products Segment Our Wood Products segment manufactures and sells lumber, plywood and residual products at five mills located in Arkansas, Idaho, Michigan and Minnesota. The segment’s products are largely commodity products, which are sold through our sales department to end users, retailers or wholesalers for nationwide distribution primarily for use in home building, repair and remodeling, industrial products and other construction activity. A description of our wood products manufacturing facilities, which are all owned by us, together with their respective 2017 capacities and actual production, are as follows: Sawmills: Warren, Arkansas St. Maries, Idaho Gwinn, Michigan Bemidji, Minnesota Plywood Mill: St. Maries, Idaho Annual Capacity1,2 Production2 220 MMBF 185 MMBF 185 MMBF 140 MMBF 207 MMBF 195 MMBF 186 MMBF 147 MMBF 150 MMSF 162 MMSF 1 Capacity represents the proven annual production capabilities of the facility under normal operating conditions and producing a normal product mix. Normal operating conditions are based on the configuration, efficiency and the number of shifts worked at each individual facility. In general, the definition includes two shifts per day for five days (two 40-hour shifts) per week at each facility, which is consistent with industry-wide recognized measures. Production can exceed capacity due to efficiency gains and overtime. 2 MMBF stands for million board feet; MMSF stands for million square feet, 3/8 inch panel thickness basis. We are a top 10 lumber manufacturer in the United States. We believe that competitiveness in this industry is largely based on individual mill efficiency and on the availability of competitively priced raw materials on a facility- by-facility basis, rather than the number of mills operated. This is due to the fact that it is generally not economical to transfer logs between or among facilities, which might permit a greater degree of specialization and operating efficiencies. Instead, each facility must utilize the raw materials that are available to it in a relatively limited geographic area. For these reasons, we believe we are able to compete effectively with companies that have a larger number of mills. We compete based on product quality, customer service and price. The principal raw material used is logs, which are obtained from our Resource segment or purchased on the open market. We generally do not maintain long-term supply contracts for a significant volume of logs. During 2017, 2016 and 2015, 39%, 34% and 33% of our log purchases, respectively, were provided by our Resource segment. 8 Real Estate Segment The activities of our Real Estate segment consist primarily of the sale of non-core timberlands in the categories of HBU, rural recreational real estate and non-strategic properties. • HBU properties have characteristics that provide primarily home site or other development potential as a result of superior location or other attractive amenities. These properties tend to have a much higher value than timberlands. • Rural recreational real estate properties also have a higher value than timberlands, but do not have the same developmental potential as HBU properties. For example, these properties may be appropriate for hunting, conservation or secondary rural housing. • Non-strategic properties are typically on the fringe of our ownership areas and are more valuable to another timberland owner. The Real Estate segment engages in real estate sales and limited subdivision activities through Potlatch TRS. From time to time, we also take advantage of opportunities to sell timberland where we believe pricing to be particularly attractive, to match a sale with a purchase of more desirable property while deferring taxes in a like- kind exchange (LKE) transaction, or to meet various other financial or strategic objectives. Sales of conservation properties and conservation easements on our properties are also included in this segment. Results for the segment depend on the demand for our non-core timberlands, the types of properties sold, the basis of these properties and the timing of closings of property sales. Although large sales of non-strategic properties can cause results that are not comparable or predictable between periods, we have maintained a relatively consistent level of rural real estate and HBU sales. A main focus of this segment is to continually assess the highest value and best use of our lands. We conduct periodic stratification assessments on our lands and as new lands are acquired. The following tools are used in assessing our lands: • • • on-the-ground analysis and verification of modeling assumptions; electronic analysis, using geographic information systems; and certain measured and ranked attributes, such as timber potential, recreational opportunities, accessibility, special features and population and demographic trends. We have identified approximately 190,000 acres of non-core timberland real estate. This includes approximately 45,000 acres of HBU property, 50,000 acres of non-strategic timberland and 95,000 acres of rural recreational real estate property. Sales of these lands are expected to occur over a decade or more. Seasonality Log and pulpwood sales volumes in our Resource segment are typically lower in the first half of each year as winter rains in the Southern region and spring thaw in the Northern region limit timber harvesting operations due to softened roadbeds and wet logging conditions that restrict access to logging sites. The third quarter is typically our Resource segment's strongest production quarter. Real Estate dispositions and acquisitions can be adversely affected when access to any properties to be sold or considered for acquisition are limited due to adverse weather conditions. Demand for our manufactured wood products typically decreases in the winter months when construction activity is slower, while demand typically increases during the spring, summer and fall when construction activity is generally higher. 9 Geographic Areas All of our timberlands, wood products manufacturing facilities and other real estate assets are located within the continental United States. In 2017, 2016 and 2015, less than 1% of our Wood Products' segment revenues were derived from sales of manufactured wood products outside of the United States, primarily to Canada and Mexico. The remainder of our revenues were from domestic sales. Environmental Regulation Our operations are subject to federal and state laws and regulations, including those relating to our emissions, wastewater discharges, solid and hazardous waste management, site remediation, endangered species and our forestry activities. We are also subject to the requirements of the Federal Occupational Safety and Health Act and comparable state statutes relating to the health and safety of our employees. We maintain environmental and safety compliance programs and conduct regular internal and independent third-party audits of our facilities and timberlands to monitor compliance with these laws and regulations. Compliance with environmental regulations is a significant factor in our business and requires capital expenditures as well as additional operating costs. Due to the significance of regulation to our business, we integrate wildlife, habitat and watershed management into our resource management practices. We also take an active approach to regulatory developments by participating in standard-setting where possible. We work cooperatively with regulators to create voluntary conservation plans that address environmental concerns while preserving our ability to operate our timberlands efficiently. Enactment of new environmental laws or regulations, or changes in existing laws or regulations, particularly relating to air and water quality, or their enforcement, may require significant expenditures by us or may adversely affect our timberland management, harvesting activities and manufacturing operations. Similarly, a number of species indigenous to our timberlands have been listed as threatened or endangered or have been proposed for one or the other status under the Endangered Species Act. As a result, our activities in or adjacent to the habitat of these species may be subject to restrictions on the harvesting of timber, reforestation activities and the construction and use of roads. We expect legislative and regulatory developments in the area of climate change to address carbon dioxide emissions and renewable energy and fuel standards. It is unclear as of this date how any such developments will affect our business. We believe that our manufacturing facilities and timberland operations are currently in substantial compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations. We cannot be certain, however, that situations that give rise to material environmental liabilities will not be discovered. At this time, we believe that federal and state laws and regulations related to the protection of endangered species and air and water quality will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or liquidity. We anticipate, however, increasingly strict laws and regulations relating to the environment, natural resources and forestry operations, as well as increased social concern over environmental issues, may result in additional restrictions on us, leading to increased costs, additional capital expenditures and reduced operating flexibility. Information regarding potentially material environmental proceedings is included in Note 16: Commitments and Contingencies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this report and incorporated herein by reference. 10 Employees As of December 31, 2017, we had 963 employees. The workforce consisted of 229 salaried, 702 hourly and 32 temporary or part-time employees. As of December 31, 2017, 18% of the workforce was covered under a collective bargaining agreement, which expires in 2020. ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS Investing in our common stock involves a significant degree of risk. Our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity could be materially adversely affected by any of the following risks and, as a result, the trading price of our common stock could decline. The risks described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also impair our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. In addition to the risk factors discussed below, investors should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties presented in Part 1 - Item 1. Business. Business and Operating Risks Our cash dividends are not guaranteed and may fluctuate, which could adversely affect our stock price. Under the REIT rules, to remain qualified as a REIT, a REIT must distribute, within a certain period after the end of each year, 90% of its ordinary taxable income for such year. Our REIT income, however, consists primarily of net capital gains resulting from payments received under timber cutting contracts with Potlatch TRS and third parties, rather than ordinary taxable income. Therefore, unlike most REITs, we are not required to distribute material amounts of cash to remain qualified as a REIT. If, after giving effect to our dividends, we have not distributed an amount equal to 100% of our REIT taxable income, then we would be required to pay tax on the undistributed portion of such taxable income at regular corporate tax rates and our stockholders would be required to include their proportionate share of any undistributed capital gain in income and would receive a credit or refund for their share of the tax paid by us. Our board of directors, in its sole discretion, determines the actual amount of dividends to be made to stockholders based on consideration of a number of factors, including, but not limited to, our results of operations, cash flow and capital requirements, economic conditions in our industry and in the markets for our products, tax considerations, borrowing capacity, debt covenant restrictions, timber prices, harvest levels on our timberlands, market demand for timberlands, including timberland properties we have identified as potentially having a higher and better use and future acquisitions and dispositions. For a description of debt covenants that could limit our ability to pay dividends to stockholders in the future, see Liquidity and Capital Resources in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. Consequently, the level of future dividends to our stockholders may fluctuate and any reduction in the dividend rate may adversely affect our stock price. The cyclical nature of our business could adversely affect our results of operations. The financial performance of our operations is affected by the cyclical nature of our business. The markets for timber, manufactured wood products and real estate are influenced by a variety of factors beyond our control. The demand for our timber and manufactured wood products is affected by the level of new residential construction, home repair and remodeling and commercial and industrial building activity, which are subject to fluctuations due to changes in economic conditions, interest rates, credit availability, population growth, weather conditions and other factors. The demand for logs is also affected by the demand for wood chips in the pulp and paper markets. The supply of timber and logs has historically increased during favorable pricing environments, which then causes downward pressure on prices. Historical prices for our manufactured wood products have been volatile and we have limited direct influence over the timing and extent of price changes for our manufactured wood products. The demand for real estate can be affected by changes in factors such as interest rates, credit availability and economic conditions, as well as by the impact of federal, state and local land use and environmental protection laws. All of our timberlands are located in Alabama, Arkansas, Idaho, Minnesota and Mississippi. As a result, we may be susceptible to adverse economic and other developments in these regions, including industry slowdowns, 11 business layoffs or downsizing, relocations of businesses, changes in demographics, increases in real estate and other taxes and increased regulation, any of which could have a material adverse effect on us. Our operating results and cash flows will be materially affected by supply and demand for timber. A variety of factors affect prices for timber, including factors affecting demand, such as changes in economic conditions, the level of domestic new construction and remodeling activity, foreign demand, interest rates, credit availability, population growth, weather conditions and pest infestation, as well as changes in timber supply and other factors. All of these factors can vary by region, timber type (sawlogs or pulpwood logs) and species. Timber prices are affected by changes in demand on a local, national or international level. The closure of a mill in the regions where we own timber can have a material adverse effect on demand and therefore pricing. As the demand for paper nationwide continues to decline, closures of pulp mills have adversely affected the demand for pulpwood and wood chips in certain of the regions in which we operate. Also, demand in other parts of the world may affect timber prices in the markets in which we compete. For example, although we do not sell into the Asian markets, Asian demand has affected supply in North American markets. A recent decrease in Asian demand has had a negative impact on lumber and timber prices in the North American markets. Timber prices are also affected by changes in timber availability at the local, national and international level. Our timberland ownership is currently concentrated in Alabama, Arkansas, Idaho, Minnesota and Mississippi. In Alabama, Arkansas, Minnesota and Mississippi, most timberlands are privately owned. Historically, increases in timber prices have often resulted in substantial increases in harvesting on private timberlands, including lands not previously made available for commercial timber operations, causing a short-term increase in supply that has tended to moderate price increases. Decreases in timber prices have often resulted in lower harvest levels, causing short-term decreases in supply that have tended to moderate price decreases. In the South, timber growth rates have exceeded harvests during the past decade, which have led to an oversupply of timber in the region, which in turn has reduced prices. In Idaho, where a greater proportion of timberland is government-owned, any substantial increase in timber harvesting from government-owned land could significantly reduce timber prices, which would harm our results of operations. For more than 20 years, environmental concerns and other factors have limited timber sales by federal agencies, which historically had been major suppliers of timber to the U.S. forest products industry, particularly in the West. Any reversal of policy that substantially increases timber sales from government-owned land could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and cash flows. On a local level, timber supplies can fluctuate depending upon factors such as changes in weather conditions and harvest strategies of local timberland owners, as well as occasionally high timber salvage efforts due to events such as unusual pest infestations or fires. Our wood products are commodities that are widely available from other producers. Because commodity products have few distinguishing properties from producer to producer, competition for these products is based primarily on price, which is determined by supply relative to demand and competition from substitute products. Prices for our products are affected by many factors outside of our control and we have no influence over the timing and extent of price changes, which often are volatile. Our profitability with respect to these products depends, in part, on managing our costs, particularly raw material and energy costs, which represent significant components of our operating costs and can fluctuate based upon factors beyond our control. The wood products industry is highly competitive. The markets for our wood products are highly competitive and companies that have substantially greater financial resources than we do compete with us in each of our lines of business. Our wood products are subject to competition from wood products manufacturers in the United States and Canada. After years of trade disputes over Canadian softwood lumber imports, the United States and Canada signed a Softwood Lumber Agreement in 2006, which expired in October 2015. The agreement established a system of tiered taxes and volume restrictions relating to Canadian lumber imports to the United States. Following expiration of the softwood lumber agreement, imports of Canadian lumber to the United States at lower prices increased, depressing U.S. lumber prices. On November 25, 2016, the U.S. lumber industry filed a petition seeking countervailing (CVD) and anti-dumping (AD) duties on Canadian lumber imports with the U.S. Department of Commerce. Final rulings on injury and CVD and 12 AD duties went into effect on December 28, 2017. The combined CVD and AD duty to be paid by most Canadian exporters was established at 20.23%. The Canadians have commenced proceedings with the NAFTA appeals panel and the World Trade Organization appealing the imposition of the duties. In addition, the governments of the United States and Canada continue to state publicly their intention to reach a negotiated settlement of these trade cases. Even if an agreement is successfully negotiated, there can be no assurance that it will at all times, or at any time, effectively create a fair trade environment. Additional information regarding the expiration of the Softwood Lumber Agreement is included in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. In addition, our wood products manufacturing facilities are relatively capital intensive, which leads to high fixed costs and generally results in continued production as long as prices are sufficient to cover variable costs. These conditions have contributed to substantial price competition, particularly during periods of reduced demand. Some of our wood products competitors may currently be lower-cost producers than we are, or may benefit from weak currencies relative to the U.S. dollar and accordingly these competitors may be less adversely affected than we are by price decreases. Wood products also are subject to significant competition from a variety of substitute products, including non-wood and engineered wood products. To the extent there is a significant increase in competitive pressure from substitute products or other domestic or foreign suppliers, our business could be adversely affected. Changes in demand for our real estate and delays in the timing of real estate transactions may affect our revenues and operating results. A number of factors, including availability of credit, a slowing of residential real estate development, population shifts and changes in demographics could reduce the demand for our real estate and negatively affect our results of operations. Changes in investor interest in purchasing timberlands could reduce our ability to execute sales of non-core timberlands and could also negatively affect our results of operations. In addition, changes in the interpretation or enforcement of current laws, or the enactment of new laws, regarding the use and development of real estate, or changes in the political composition of federal, state and local governmental bodies could lead to new or greater costs, delays and liabilities that could materially adversely affect our real estate business, profitability or financial condition. There are inherent uncertainties in the timing of real estate transactions that could adversely affect our operating results in any particular quarter. The timing of real estate sales is a function of many factors, including the general state of the economy, demand in local real estate markets, the number of properties listed for sale, the seasonal nature of sales, the plans of adjacent landowners and our expectations of future price appreciation. Delays in the completion of transactions or the termination of potential transactions may be beyond our control. These events could adversely affect our operating results. We may be unable to harvest timber or we may elect to reduce harvest levels due to market, weather and regulatory conditions, either of which could adversely affect our results of operations and cash flows. Our timber harvest levels and sales may be limited due to weather conditions, timber growth cycles, restrictions on access, availability of contract loggers and regulatory requirements associated with the protection of wildlife and water resources, as well as by other factors, including damage by fire, pest infestation, disease and natural disasters such as ice storms, wind storms, tornadoes, hurricanes and floods. Changes in global climate conditions could intensify one or more of these factors. Although damage from such natural causes usually is localized, affecting only a limited percentage of our timber, there can be no assurance that any damage affecting our timberlands will be limited. We typically experience seasonally lower harvest activity during the winter and early spring due to weather conditions. Severe weather conditions and other natural disasters can also reduce the productivity of timberlands and disrupt the harvesting and delivery of logs. Our financial results and cash flows are dependent to a significant extent on our continued ability to harvest timber at adequate levels. On a short-term basis, we may adjust our timber harvest levels in response to market conditions. Longer term, our timber harvest levels will be affected by acquisitions of additional timberlands, sales of existing timberlands and shifts in harvest from one region to another. In addition to timberland acquisitions and sales, future timber harvest levels may be affected by changes in estimates of long-term sustainable yield because of silvicultural advances, natural disasters, fires, pests, insects and other hazards, regulatory constraints and other factors beyond our control. 13 We do not insure against losses of standing timber from fire or any other causes. The volume and value of timber that can be harvested from our lands may be affected by natural disasters such as fire, pest infestation, disease, ice storms, wind storms, tornadoes, hurricanes, floods and other weather conditions and causes beyond our control. As is typical in the forest industry, we assume substantially all risk of loss to the standing timber we own from fire and other hazards because insuring for such losses is not practicable. Consequently, a reduction in our timber inventory could adversely affect our financial results and cash flows. In addition, the geographic concentration of our property makes us more susceptible to adverse impacts from a single natural disaster such as fire, hurricane, earthquake, insect infestation, drought, disease, ice storms, windstorms, tornadoes, flooding and other factors that could negatively impact our timber production. A material disruption at one of our manufacturing facilities could prevent us from meeting customer demand, reduce our sales or negatively affect our results of operations and financial condition. Any of our manufacturing facilities, or any of our machines within an otherwise operational facility, could cease operations unexpectedly due to a number of events, including unscheduled maintenance outages, prolonged power failures, equipment failures, raw material shortages, cyber-attacks, labor difficulties, disruptions in the transportation infrastructure, such as roads, bridges, railroad tracks and tunnels, fire, ice storms, floods, windstorms, tornadoes, hurricanes or other catastrophes, terrorism or threats of terrorism, governmental regulations and other operational problems. Any such downtime or facility damage could prevent us from meeting customer demand for our products and/or require us to make unplanned capital expenditures. If one of these machines or facilities were to incur significant downtime, our ability to meet our production targets and satisfy customer requirements could be impaired, resulting in lower sales and income. Our businesses are affected by logger and transportation availability and costs. Our business depends on the availability of logging contractors and providers of transportation of wood products and is materially affected by the cost and availability of these service providers. Therefore, increases in the cost of fuel could negatively impact our financial results by increasing the cost associated with logging activities and transportation services and could also result in an overall reduction in the availability of these services. Truck driver shortages could negatively impact our financial results by reducing the volume of delivered wood products. We may be unsuccessful in carrying out our acquisition strategy. We have pursued, and may continue to pursue, acquisitions of strategic timberland properties and other forest products assets. We compete with buyers that have substantially greater financial resources than we have for acquisition opportunities. We intend to finance acquisitions through cash from operations, borrowings under our credit facility, proceeds from equity or debt offerings, proceeds from asset dispositions or any combination thereof. In addition, it is uncertain whether any acquisitions we make will perform in accordance with our expectations. The failure to identify and complete acquisitions of suitable properties could adversely affect our operating results and cash flows. Our businesses are subject to extensive environmental laws and regulations. Our operations are subject to a variety of federal, state and local laws and regulations regarding protection of the environment, including those relating to the protection of timberlands, endangered species, timber harvesting practices, recreation and aesthetics, protection and restoration of natural resources, air and water quality and remedial standards for contaminated soil, sediments and groundwater. Failure to comply with these requirements can result in significant fines or penalties, as well as liabilities for remediation of contaminated sites, natural resource damages or alleged personal injury or property damage claims. Laws, regulations and related judicial decisions and administrative interpretations affecting our business are subject to change and new laws and regulations that may affect our business are frequently enacted. These changes may adversely affect our ability to harvest and sell timber and operate our manufacturing facilities and may adversely affect the ability of others to develop property we intend to sell for higher and better use purposes. Over time, the complexity and stringency of these laws and regulations have increased markedly and the 14 enforcement of these laws and regulations has intensified. We believe that these laws and regulations will continue to become more restrictive and over time could adversely affect our operating results. Regulatory restrictions on future harvesting activities may be significant. Federal, state and local laws and regulations, which are intended to protect threatened and endangered species, as well as waterways and wetlands, limit and may prevent timber harvesting, road building and other activities on our timberlands. For example, the Clean Water Act and comparable state laws, regulations and best management practices programs protect water quality. As a result, our resource management activities adjacent to rivers and streams, as well as the point source discharges from our manufacturing facilities, are subject to strict regulation and there can be no assurance that our forest management and manufacturing activities will not be subject to increased regulation under the Clean Water Act in the future. Similarly, the threatened and endangered species restrictions apply to activities that would adversely impact a protected species or significantly degrade its habitat. A number of species on our timberlands have been, and in the future may be, protected under these laws. If current or future regulations or their enforcement become more restrictive, the amount of our timberlands subject to harvest restrictions could increase. We anticipate that increasingly strict laws and regulations relating to the environment, natural resources and forestry operations, as well as increased social concern over environmental issues, may result in additional restrictions on us, leading to increased costs, additional capital expenditures and reduced operating flexibility. Our manufacturing operations are subject to stringent environmental laws, regulations and permits covering air emissions, wastewater discharge, water usage and waste handling and disposal that govern how we operate our facilities. These laws, regulations and permits, now and in the future, may restrict our current production and limit our ability to increase production and impose significant costs on our operations with respect to environmental compliance. Overall, it is expected that environmental compliance costs will likely increase over time as environmental requirements become more stringent and as the expectations of the communities in which we operate become more demanding. Certain environmental laws, including the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) impose strict, and under certain circumstances joint and several, liability on responsible parties, including current and former owners and operators of contaminated sites, for costs of investigation and remediation of contamination. They also impose liability for related damages to natural resources. We have in the past been identified by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a potentially responsible party under CERCLA at various locations and we are currently identified as a potentially responsible party in connection with one of our properties. Additional information regarding this matter is included in Note 16: Commitments and Contingencies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this report and that information is incorporated herein by reference. It is possible that other facilities we own or operate, or formerly owned or operated, or timberlands we now own or acquire, could also become subject to liabilities under these laws. The cost of investigation and remediation of contaminated properties could increase operating costs and adversely affect our financial results. Although we believe we have appropriate amounts accrued for the investigation and remediation of known matters, there can be no assurance that actual expenditures will not exceed our expectations and that amounts accrued will not be increased or that other unknown liabilities will not be discovered in the future. Environmental groups and interested individuals may intervene in the regulatory processes in the locations where we own timberlands and operate our wood products mills. Delays or restrictions on our operations due to the intervention of environmental groups or interested individuals could adversely affect our operating results. In addition to intervention in regulatory proceedings, interested parties may file or threaten to file lawsuits that seek to prevent us from obtaining permits, harvesting timber under contract with federal or state agencies, implementing capital improvements or pursuing operating plans or require us to obtain permits before pursuing operating plans. Any lawsuit, or even a threatened lawsuit, could delay harvesting on our timberlands or impact our ability to operate or invest in our wood products mills. Our defined benefit pension plans are currently underfunded. We have qualified defined benefit pension plans that cover the majority of our employees. The determination of pension plan expense and the requirements for funding our pension plans are based on a number of actuarial assumptions. Two critical assumptions are the expected rate of return on plan assets and the discount rate applied to pension plan obligations. Pension plan assets primarily consist of equity and fixed income investments; therefore, fluctuations in actual equity market returns and changes in long-term interest rates may result in 15 increased pension costs in future periods. Changes in assumptions regarding discount rates and expected rates of return on plan assets could also increase future pension costs. Changes in any of these factors may significantly impact future contribution requirements. For additional information regarding this matter see Note 12: Savings Plans, Pension Plans and Other Postretirement Employee Benefits in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and Liquidity and Capital Resources and Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates included in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. We depend on external sources of capital for future growth. Our ability to finance growth is dependent to a significant degree on external sources of capital. Our ability to access such capital on favorable terms could be hampered by a number of factors, many of which are outside of our control, including a decline in general market conditions, decreased market liquidity, a downgrade to our public debt rating, increases in interest rates, an unfavorable market perception of our growth potential, a decrease in our current or estimated future earnings or a decrease in the market price of our common stock. In addition, our ability to access additional capital may also be limited by the terms of our existing indebtedness, which, among other things, restricts our incurrence of debt and the payment of dividends. For additional details, see Liquidity and Capital Resources in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. Any of these factors, individually or in combination, could prevent us from being able to obtain the capital we require on terms that are acceptable to us and the failure to obtain necessary capital could materially adversely affect our future growth. A strike or other work stoppage, or our inability to renew collective bargaining agreements on favorable terms, could adversely affect our financial results. As of December 31, 2017, approximately 18% of our workforce was covered by a collective bargaining agreement, which expires in 2020. If our unionized workers were to engage in a strike or other work stoppage, or other non-unionized operations were to become unionized, we could experience a significant disruption of operations at our facilities or higher ongoing labor costs. A strike or other work stoppage in the facilities of any of our major customers or suppliers could also have similar effects on us. A security failure of our information technology infrastructure could impact our ability to operate our businesses effectively, adversely affect our reported financial results, impact our reputation and expose us to potential liability or litigation. We use information systems to carry out our operational activities and maintain our business records. Some systems are internally managed, and some are maintained by third-party service providers. We and our service providers employ what we believe are adequate security measures. Our ability to conduct business could be materially and adversely affected if these systems or resources are compromised, damaged or fail. This could be a result of a cyber incident, natural disaster, hardware or software corruption, failure or error, service provider error or failure, intentional or unintentional personnel actions or other disruption. In the ordinary course of our business, we collect and store small amounts of sensitive data, including personally identifiable information. If this data is compromised, destroyed or inappropriately disclosed, it could have a material adverse effect, including damage to our reputation, loss of customers, significant expenses to address and resolve the issues, or litigation or other proceedings by affected individuals, business partners and/or regulators. 16 Risks Related to Our Indebtedness Our indebtedness could materially adversely affect our ability to generate sufficient cash to pay dividends to stockholders and fulfill our debt obligations, our ability to react to changes in our business and our ability to incur additional indebtedness to fund future needs. Our debt requires interest and principal payments. As of December 31, 2017, we had long-term debt of $576.5 million, including $14.3 million due in the first quarter of 2018. Subject to the limits contained in our debt instruments, we may be able to incur additional debt from time to time to finance working capital, capital expenditures, investments or acquisitions or for other purposes. If we do so, the risks related to our indebtedness could intensify. Our indebtedness increases the possibility that we may be unable to generate cash sufficient to pay, when due, the principal of, interest on or other amounts due in respect of our indebtedness or to pay dividends to our stockholders. Our indebtedness, combined with our other financial obligations and contractual commitments, could have important consequences for stockholders. For example, it could: • make it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with respect to our indebtedness and any failure to comply with the obligations under any of our debt instruments, including restrictive covenants, could result in an event of default under the agreements governing such indebtedness; • • • • require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to payments on our indebtedness, thereby reducing funds available for dividends to stockholders, working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other purposes; increase our vulnerability to adverse economic and industry conditions, which could place us at a competitive disadvantage compared with our competitors that have relatively less indebtedness; limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industries in which we operate; and limit our ability to borrow additional funds, or to dispose of assets to raise funds, if needed, for dividends to stockholders, working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other corporate purposes. Changes in credit ratings issued by nationally recognized statistical rating organizations could adversely affect our cost of financing and have an adverse effect on the market price of our securities. Credit rating agencies rate our debt securities on factors that include our operating results, actions that we take, their view of the general outlook for our industry and their view of the general outlook for the economy. Actions taken by the rating agencies can include maintaining, upgrading or downgrading the current rating or placing us on a watch list for possible future downgrading. Downgrading the credit rating of our debt securities or placing us on a watch list for possible future downgrading could limit our access to the credit markets, increase our cost of financing and have an adverse effect on the market price of our securities. For additional detail on our credit ratings see Liquidity and Capital Resources in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. REIT and Tax-Related Risks If we fail to remain qualified as a REIT, income from our timberlands will be subject to taxation at regular corporate rates and we will have reduced cash available for dividends to our stockholders. Qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and complex provisions of the Internal Revenue Code to our operations, including satisfaction of certain asset, income, organizational, dividend, stockholder ownership and other requirements, on an ongoing basis. Given the highly complex nature of the rules governing REITs, the ongoing importance of factual determinations and the possibility of future changes in our circumstances, no assurance can be given that we will remain qualified as a REIT. 17 In addition, the rules dealing with federal income taxation are constantly under review by persons involved in the legislative process and by the IRS and the U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury). Changes to the tax laws affecting REITs or taxable REIT subsidiaries, which may have retroactive application, could adversely affect our stockholders or us. We cannot predict how changes in the tax laws might affect our stockholders or us. Accordingly, we cannot provide assurance that new legislation, Treasury regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions will not significantly affect our ability to remain qualified as a REIT, the federal income tax consequences of such qualification, the determination of the amount of REIT taxable income or the amount of tax paid by the TRS. If in any taxable year we fail to remain qualified as a REIT: • we would not be allowed a deduction for dividends to stockholders in computing our taxable income; and • we would be subject to federal income tax on our taxable income at regular corporate rates, including any applicable alternative minimum tax. Any such corporate tax liability could be substantial and would reduce the amount of cash available for dividends to our stockholders, which in turn could have an adverse impact on the value of our common stock. In addition, we would be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which the qualification was lost, unless we are entitled to relief under certain statutory provisions. As a result, net income and the cash available for dividends to our stockholders could be reduced for at least five years, which would have an adverse impact on the value of our common stock. Certain of our business activities are potentially subject to a prohibited transactions tax on 100% of our net income derived from such activities, which would reduce our cash flow and impair our ability to pay dividends. REITs are generally intended to be passive entities and can thus only engage in those activities permitted by the Internal Revenue Code, which for us generally include owning and managing a timberland portfolio, growing timber and selling standing timber. Accordingly, the manufacture and sale of wood products, certain types of timberland sales and the harvest and sale of logs are conducted through Potlatch TRS because such activities generate non-qualifying REIT income and could constitute “prohibited transactions” if such activities were engaged in directly by the REIT. In general, prohibited transactions are defined by the Internal Revenue Code to be sales or other dispositions of property held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of a trade or business. By conducting our business in this manner, we believe we will satisfy the REIT requirements of the Internal Revenue Code and thus avoid the 100% tax that could be imposed if a REIT were to conduct a prohibited transaction. We may not always be successful, however, in limiting such activities to Potlatch TRS. Therefore, we could be subject to the 100% prohibited transactions tax if such instances were to occur, which would adversely affect our cash flow and impair our ability to pay quarterly dividends. Our REIT structure may limit our ability to invest in our non-REIT qualifying operations. Our use of Potlatch TRS enables us to continue to engage in non-REIT qualifying business activities consisting primarily of our manufacturing facilities, assets used for the harvesting of timber and the sale of logs and selected land parcels that we expect to be sold or developed for higher and better use purposes. However, under the Internal Revenue Code, no more than 20% of the value of the assets of a REIT may be represented by securities of our taxable REIT subsidiaries. This may limit our ability to make investments in our wood products manufacturing operations or in other non-REIT qualifying operations. 18 Our ability to pay dividends and service our indebtedness using cash generated through our taxable REIT subsidiary may be limited. The rules with which we must comply to maintain our status as a REIT limit our ability to use dividends from Potlatch TRS for the payment of stockholder dividends and to service our indebtedness. In particular, at least 75% of our gross income for each taxable year as a REIT must be derived from sales of our standing timber and other types of real estate income. No more than 25% of our gross income may consist of dividends from Potlatch TRS and other non-qualifying types of income. This requirement may limit our ability to receive dividends from Potlatch TRS and may impact our ability to pay dividends to stockholders and service the REIT's indebtedness using cash from Potlatch TRS. We may not be able to realize our deferred tax assets. We may not have sufficient future taxable income to realize all our deferred tax assets. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets depends on the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which our temporary differences are deductible as governed by the Internal Revenue Code. On December 22, 2017, the H.R. 1, Tax Cut and Jobs Act was enacted that decreased the top corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%. As a result, the value of our deferred tax assets was reduced by $10.7 million. The amount of our deferred tax assets could be reduced in the near term if future taxable income does not materialize or management is unable to implement one or more strategies that it has identified to generate taxable income. See Note 15: Income Taxes in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this report for additional information about our deferred tax assets. Risks Related to Ownership of Our Common Stock The price of our common stock may be volatile. The market price of our common stock may be influenced by many factors, some of which are beyond our control, including those described above under Business and Operating Risks and the following: actual or anticipated fluctuations in our operating results or our competitors’ operating results, announcements by us or our competitors of capacity changes, acquisitions or strategic investments, our growth rate and our competitors’ growth rates, the financial markets, interest rates and general economic conditions, changes in stock market analyst recommendations regarding us, our competitors or the forest products industry generally, or lack of analyst coverage of our common stock, failure to pay cash dividends or the amount of cash dividends paid, sales of our common stock by our executive officers, directors and significant stockholders or sales of substantial amounts of common stock, changes in accounting principles and changes in tax laws and regulations. Certain provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws and of Delaware law may make it difficult for stockholders to change the composition of our board of directors and may discourage hostile takeover attempts that some of our stockholders may consider to be beneficial. Certain provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws and of Delaware law may have the effect of delaying or preventing changes in control if our board of directors determines that such changes in control are not in the best interest of us and our stockholders. The provisions in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws include, among other things, the following: • • • • • • a classified board of directors with three-year staggered terms; the ability of our board of directors to issue shares of preferred stock and to determine the price and other terms, including preferences and voting rights, of those shares without stockholder approval; stockholder action can only be taken at a special or regular meeting and not by written consent and stockholders cannot call a special meeting except upon the written request of stockholders entitled to cast not less than a majority of all of the votes entitled to be cast at the meeting; advance notice procedures for nominating candidates to our board of directors or presenting matters at stockholder meetings; removal of directors only for cause; allowing only our board of directors to fill vacancies on our board of directors; 19 • • • in order to facilitate the preservation of our status as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code, a prohibition on any single stockholder, or any group of affiliated stockholders, from beneficially owning more than 9.8% of our outstanding common or preferred stock, unless our board waives or modifies this ownership limitation; unless approved by the vote of at least 80% of our outstanding shares, we may not engage in business combinations, including mergers, dispositions of assets, certain issuances of shares of stock and other specified transactions, with a person owning or controlling, directly or indirectly, 5% or more of the voting power of our outstanding common stock; and supermajority voting requirements to amend our bylaws and certain provisions of our certificate of incorporation. While these provisions have the effect of encouraging persons seeking to acquire control of our company to negotiate with our board of directors, they could enable the board of directors to hinder or frustrate a transaction that stockholders might believe to be in their best interests and, in that case, may prevent or discourage attempts to remove and replace incumbent directors. We are also subject to Delaware laws that could have similar effects. One of these laws prohibits us from engaging in a business combination with a significant stockholder unless specific conditions are met. Risks Related to Our Merger with Deltic Our merger with Deltic may not be completed on the terms currently contemplated, or at all. The Company, Merger Sub and Deltic entered into the Merger Agreement pursuant to which Deltic will merge with and into Merger Sub, with Merger Sub continuing as the surviving corporation. If the merger is not completed, our businesses may be adversely affected and we may be subject to various risks without realizing any of the benefits of having the merger completed, including the following: • We may be required, under certain circumstances, to pay a termination fee of $66 million; • We may experience negative reactions from the financial markets or from our customers, suppliers or employees; and • We may be subject to litigation related to any failure to complete the merger or to enforcement proceedings commenced against us to perform our obligations under the Merger Agreement. Any delay in completing the merger, which is subject to a number of conditions, some of which are outside of our control, may reduce or eliminate the expected benefits from the transaction. The merger is subject to required stockholder approvals, which may prevent, delay or otherwise materially adversely affect its completion. The requirements for obtaining the required stockholder approvals could delay the completion of the merger for a significant period of time or prevent it from occurring. In addition, several putative class action lawsuits relating to the merger have been filed and additional lawsuits may be filed, which could delay completion of the merger. We intend to vigorously defend the litigation but we cannot predict the outcome. Any delay in completing the merger could cause us not to realize some or all of the synergies and other benefits that we expect to achieve if the merger is successfully completed within its expected time frame. The Merger Agreement contains certain restrictions on the conduct of our business. If the merger is delayed, these restrictions could adversely affect our ability to execute business strategies or pursue attractive business opportunities. In addition, a delay could cause our management to focus on completion of the merger instead of on other opportunities that could be beneficial to the company. The merger will involve substantial costs. We have incurred and expect to continue to incur substantial costs and expenses relating directly to the merger including fees and expenses payable to financial advisors, other professional fees and expenses, insurance premium costs, HSR filing fees, SEC filing fees, printing and mailing costs and other transaction-related costs, fees and expenses. We also will incur transaction fees and costs related to formulating and implementing integration plans, including facilities and systems consolidation costs, employment-related costs and costs related to the special distribution. There are a large number of systems that must be integrated, including management 20 information, purchasing, accounting and finance, sales, billing, payroll and benefits, fixed asset and lease administration systems and regulatory compliance. Expenses related to this integration are by their nature difficult to estimate accurately. These expenses could, particularly in the near term, exceed the savings that we expect to achieve from the realization of economies of scale and cost savings and synergies related to the integration of the businesses. These integration expenses likely will result in significant charges against earnings following the completion of the merger, but the amount and timing of such charges are uncertain. We may be unable to integrate successfully the businesses of Potlatch and Deltic and realize the anticipated benefits of the merger. The merger involves the combination of two independently operated public companies. The merger will require management to devote significant attention and resources to integrating business practices and operations. The combined company may fail to realize some or all of the anticipated benefits of the merger if the integration process takes longer than expected or is more costly than expected. Potential difficulties the combined company may encounter in the integration process include the following: • • • • • • • the inability to successfully combine the businesses of Potlatch and Deltic in a manner that permits the combined company to achieve the cost savings and synergies anticipated to result from the merger, which would result in the anticipated benefits of the merger not being realized partly or wholly in the time frame currently anticipated or at all; lost sales and customers as a result of certain customers of either of the two companies deciding not to do business with the combined company; complexities associated with managing the combined businesses; integrating personnel from the two companies; creation of uniform standards, controls, procedures, policies and information systems; potential unknown liabilities and unforeseen increased expenses or delays associated with the merger; and performance shortfalls at one or both of the two companies as a result of the diversion of management’s attention caused by completing the merger and integrating the companies’ operations. Uncertainties associated with the merger may cause a loss of management personnel and other key employees of Potlatch or Deltic which could adversely affect the future business and operations of the combined company following the merger. Potlatch and Deltic are dependent on the experience and industry knowledge of their officers and other key employees to execute their business plans and conduct operations. The combined company’s success after the merger will depend in part upon its ability to retain key management personnel and other key employees of Potlatch and Deltic. Current and prospective employees of Potlatch and Deltic may experience uncertainty about their future roles with the combined company following the merger, which may materially adversely affect the ability of each of Potlatch and Deltic to attract and retain key personnel during the pendency of the merger. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that the combined company will be able to retain key management personnel and other key employees of Potlatch and Deltic. Uncertainty due to the pendency of the merger could adversely affect the business and operations of Potlatch or Deltic. In connection with the pendency of the merger, some customers, suppliers or other entities with whom Potlatch or Deltic have a business relationship may delay or defer decisions, which could negatively impact revenues, earnings and cash flows of Potlatch or Deltic, as well as the market price of shares of Potlatch common stock regardless of whether the merger is completed. In addition, customers or suppliers may cease doing business with Potlatch, Deltic or the combined company in anticipation of or following the merger or may change the terms and conditions upon which they are willing to continue to do business. In addition, current or prospective competitors of Potlatch, Deltic or the combined company may seek to take advantage of potential uncertainty or disruption resulting from the merger to interfere with relationships with customers, suppliers or employees. 21 Potlatch’s future results will suffer if the combined company does not effectively manage its expanded operations following the merger. Following the merger, the size of the business of the combined company will increase significantly beyond the current size of either Potlatch’s or Deltic’s current businesses. In addition, the combined company may continue to expand its operations through additional acquisitions or other strategic transactions. Potlatch’s future success depends, in part, upon its ability to manage its expanded business, which may pose substantial challenges for management, including challenges related to the management and monitoring of new operations and associated increased costs and complexity. There can be no assurances that the combined company will be successful or that it will realize the expected economies of scale, synergies and other benefits currently anticipated from the merger or anticipated from any additional acquisitions or strategic transactions. The market price of shares of Potlatch common stock may decline in the future as a result of the merger. The market price of shares of Potlatch common stock may decline in the future as a result of the merger for a number of reasons, including the unsuccessful integration of Potlatch and Deltic or the failure of Potlatch to achieve the perceived benefits of the merger, including financial results, as rapidly as or to the extent anticipated by financial or industry analysts. The merger may not be accretive and may cause dilution to Potlatch’s cash available for distribution per share, which may negatively affect the market price of shares of Potlatch common stock. The merger is expected to deliver accretion to Potlatch’s cash available for distribution per share in the first full year after the merger, including cost synergies and excluding integration and restructuring activities. This expectation is based on preliminary estimates which may materially change, including the currently expected timing of the merger. Potlatch could also encounter additional transaction-related costs or other factors such as a delay in the closing of the merger or the failure to realize all of the benefits anticipated in the merger. Any of these factors could cause dilution to Potlatch’s cash available for distribution per share or decrease or delay the expected accretive effect of the merger and cause a decrease in the market price of shares of Potlatch common stock. The combined company may incur adverse tax consequences as a result of Deltic’s status as a non-REIT “C corporation” for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Because Deltic is not a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, Potlatch and its stockholders will face the following adverse tax consequences as a result of the merger: • Potlatch will generally inherit any corporate income tax liabilities of Deltic, including penalties and interest; • Potlatch will be subject to regular corporate-level tax on the built-in gain in each asset of Deltic existing at the time of the merger if Potlatch were to dispose of a Deltic asset during the five-year period following the merger; and • Potlatch will be required to pay one or more special distributions to eliminate any earnings and profits accumulated by Deltic, which distributions will be taxable and are expected in substantial part to be paid in Potlatch stock and thus may cause a stockholder receiving such distributions to incur a tax liability that exceeds the cash received by such stockholder. As a result of these factors, Deltic’s status as a non-REIT “C corporation” could reduce Potlatch’s cash available for distribution to stockholders or impair its ability after the merger to expand its business and raise capital, could materially adversely affect the value of shares of Potlatch’s common stock, and could have other adverse effects for Potlatch and its stockholders. 22 ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS None. ITEM 2. PROPERTIES Information on our locations and facilities is included in Part I - Item 1. Business under each of the respective segment headers. ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS Other than the environmental proceedings described in Note 16: Commitments and Contingencies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, which is incorporated herein by reference, we believe there is no pending or threatened litigation that could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or liquidity. ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES Not applicable. 23 Part II ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES Our common stock trades on The Nasdaq Global Select Market (NASDAQ). The quarterly high and low sales price per share of our common stock and the quarterly cash dividend payments per share for 2017 and 2016 were as follows: 2017 2016 Quarter 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Low High Cash Dividends Cash Dividends $ 46.00 $ 39.05 $ 0.375 $ 32.00 $ 24.01 $ 0.375 $ 48.85 $ 43.15 $ 0.375 $ 35.94 $ 31.06 $ 0.375 $ 51.40 $ 43.85 $ 0.375 $ 39.91 $ 33.01 $ 0.375 0.40 $ 44.00 $ 36.35 $ 0.375 $ 56.35 $ 47.80 $ High Low There were approximately 984 stockholders of record at January 31, 2018. Our board of directors, in its sole discretion, determines the actual amount of dividends to be paid to stockholders based on consideration of a number of factors, including, but not limited to, our results of operations, cash flow and capital requirements, economic conditions in our industry and in the markets for our products, timber prices, harvest levels on our timberlands, market demand for timberlands, including timberland properties we have identified as potentially having a higher and better use, future acquisitions and dispositions, tax considerations, borrowing capacity and debt covenant restrictions. Consequently, the level of dividends paid to our stockholders may fluctuate and any reduction in the dividend rate may adversely affect our stock price. Reference is made to the discussion in Liquidity and Capital Resources in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of (i) the covenants in our credit facility and term loan and the indenture governing our senior notes with which we must comply in order to make cash dividends and (ii) the REIT tax rules, which under certain circumstances may restrict our ability to receive dividends from Potlatch TRS, our taxable REIT subsidiary. ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS On April 26, 2016, our board of directors authorized management to repurchase up to $60 million of common stock over a period of 24 months (the Repurchase Plan). Common Share Purchases April (4/28/16 - 4/30/16) May (5/1/16 - 5/31/16) June (6/1/16 - 6/30/16) July (7/1/16 - 7/31/16) August (8/1/16 - 8/31/16) September (9/1/16 - 9/30/16) October (10/1/16 - 10/31/16) November (11/1/16 - 11/30/16) December (12/1/16 - 12/31/16) Total Shares Purchased Total Number of Shares Purchased Average Price Paid Per Share Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of a Publicly Announced Plan Maximum Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plan 94,625 $ 75,000 $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 169,625 $ 35.46 34.61 — — — — — — — 35.08 94,625 $ 75,000 $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 169,625 56,644,779 54,048,978 54,048,978 54,048,978 54,048,978 54,048,978 54,048,978 54,048,978 54,048,978 No repurchase transactions occurred in 2017. We repurchased 169,625 shares of common stock for $6.0 million (including transaction costs) in 2016. Transaction costs are not counted against authorized funds under the Repurchase Plan. All purchases were made in open-market transactions. 24 We record share purchases upon trade date, as opposed to the settlement date when cash is disbursed. We record a liability to account for repurchases that have not been settled. There were no unsettled repurchases as of December 31, 2017 and 2016. EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION The following table provides information about securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2017: Plan Category Equity compensation plans approved by security holders Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders Total Number of securitie s to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights1 (a) Number of securitie s remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) (c) Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights2 (b) 814,668 $ — 814,668 $ — — — 373,968 — 373,968 1 2 The number of performance shares issued, as a percentage of the amount subject to the performance share award, could range from 0% to 200%. The number of performance shares to be issued is based on 181% of vested and unvested shares, which was 504,753. Also included are 93,910 RSUs and 216,005 deferred compensation stock equivalent units. Performance shares and RSUs do not have exercise prices and are therefore not included in the weighted-average exercise price calculation. 25 Company Stock Price Performance The following graph and table show a five year comparison of cumulative total stockholder returns for our company, the NAREIT Equity Index, the Standard & Poor’s 500 Composite Index and a group of five companies that we refer to as our Peer Group for the period ended December 31, 2017. The total stockholder return assumes $100 invested at December 31, 2012, with quarterly reinvestment of all dividends. $220 $210 $200 $190 $180 $170 $160 $150 $140 $130 $120 $110 $100 $90 $80 1 2 / 3 1 / 1 2 1 2 / 3 1 / 1 3 1 2 / 3 1 / 1 4 1 2 / 3 1 / 1 5 1 2 / 3 1 / 1 6 1 2 / 3 1 / 1 7 Potlatch Corporation NAREIT Equity Index S&P 500 Index 2017 Peer Group Potlatch Corporation NAREIT Equity Index S&P 500 Composite 2017 Peer Group1 2013 2014 At December 31, 2015 2016 2017 $ $ $ $ 110 $ 102 $ 132 $ 106 $ 114 $ 133 $ 151 $ 117 $ 86 $ 138 $ 153 $ 104 $ 123 $ 149 $ 171 $ 115 $ 152 157 208 137 1 Our peer group companies are Deltic Timber Corp., Rayonier Inc., St. Joe Co., Universal Forest Products Inc. and Weyerhaeuser Co. Returns are weighted based on market capitalizations as of the beginning of each year. The performance graph above is being furnished solely to accompany this Report pursuant to Item 201(e) of Regulation S-K and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and is not to be incorporated by reference into any of our filings, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation in such filing. 26 ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA POTLATCH CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES (Dollars in thousands - except per share amounts) Revenues Net income1 2016 2017 2015 $ 678,595 $ 599,099 $ 575,336 $ 606,950 $ 570,289 89,910 $ 70,581 $ 86,453 $ 10,938 $ 31,714 $ 2014 2013 Total assets1,2 Long-term debt (including current portion)1,2 Total stockholders’ equity $ 953,079 $ 927,681 $1,016,612 $1,031,746 $ 677,202 $ 573,319 $ 583,988 $ 603,881 $ 625,668 $ 316,764 $ 200,542 $ 156,274 $ 203,736 $ 225,066 $ 204,148 Capital expenditures:3 Property, plant and equipment Timberlands reforestation and roads Total capital expenditures Net income per share: Basic Diluted Dividends per share Weighted-average shares outstanding (in thousands): Basic Diluted $ 12,855 $ 15,207 5,866 $ 13,422 $ 28,062 $ 19,288 $ 18,987 $ 13,745 32,732 $ 13,261 $ 10,280 12,313 10,971 24,232 $ 22,593 $ $ $ 2.12 $ 2.10 $ 1.525 $ 0.27 $ 0.27 $ 1.50 $ 0.78 $ 0.77 $ 1.50 $ 2.21 $ 2.20 $ 1.425 $ 1.74 1.73 1.28 40,824 41,227 40,798 41,033 40,842 40,988 40,749 40,894 40,503 40,709 1 2 3 In the second quarter of 2016, we sold approximately 172,000 acres of timberlands located in central Idaho for $114 million at a loss of $48.5 million before taxes and repaid $42.6 million of revenue bonds. In December 2014, we acquired approximately 201,000 acres of timberland in Alabama and Mississippi for a total purchase price of $384 million, which was funded with $310 million of new term loans and cash on hand. Excludes the acquisition of timber and timberlands. 27 ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Introduction The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with Part I - Item 1. Business and Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. Our business is organized into three reporting segments: Resource, Wood Products and Real Estate. Sales between segments are recorded as intersegment revenues based on prevailing market prices. Approximately one-fourth of the Resource segment’s sales have been to Wood Products. Our other segments generally do not generate intersegment revenues. In the discussion of our consolidated results of operations, our revenues are reported after elimination of intersegment revenues. In the business segment discussions, each segment’s revenues are presented before elimination of intersegment revenues. The operating results of our Resource, Wood Products and Real Estate business segments have been and will continue to be influenced by a variety of factors, including the cyclical nature of the forest products industry, changes in timber prices and in harvest levels from our timberlands, competition, timberland valuations, demand for our non-strategic timberland for higher and better use purposes, lumber prices, the efficiency and level of capacity utilization of our wood products manufacturing operations, changes in our principal expenses such as log costs, asset dispositions or acquisitions and other factors. See Part I - Item 1A. Risk Factors for additional information. Overview Summary of 2017 With over half of our total revenues indexed to lumber, increased lumber sale prices contributed to strong results for 2017. We also benefited from higher cedar prices and a greater mix of cedar. Our lumber mills continued to have improved lumber recovery and better grade yield. Production increased almost 50 MMBF to set a new company record. The Real Estate segment continued to sell non-core timberlands at margins in excess of 60%. Higher lumber prices for 2017 were affected by several factors, including: • Restricted production in Canada due to forest fires; • Hurricanes in the South affecting logistics; • Uncertainty in the Canadian softwood lumber case (final duties went into effect on December 28, 2017); • Strong U.S. markets for home repair and remodel and commercial and industrial buildings; and • A continued rise in U.S. housing starts. In 2018, we expect continued strength in lumber prices resulting from the following factors: • A continued increase in U.S. housing starts and a strong U.S. home improvement market, including rebuild and repairs from 2017’s hurricanes and wildfires; and • Expected U.S. economic growth resulting from the December 22, 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, including strengthening employment and higher disposable incomes. Summary of 2016 During 2016, all three of our business segments contributed to our positive results. The Resource segment achieved planned harvest volumes despite challenging weather conditions. The capital projects completed in 2015 at each of our lumber mills resulted in improved lumber recovery, better grade yield and increased production. The Real Estate segment sold approximately 172,000 acres of non-strategic timberlands located in central Idaho for $114 million and closed three large conservation sales during the year. 28 Summary of 2015 During 2015, the Resource and Wood Products segment results were affected by lower lumber prices resulting from excess supply in the United States. Lumber demand decreased in early 2015 due to adverse weather in the eastern part of the United States, which slowed housing starts, while a mild winter in the western part of the United States did not limit timber harvesting, which provided for strong log and lumber production volumes. A decrease in lumber exported by Canada to China, coupled with a weak Canadian dollar relative to the U.S. dollar, resulted in higher Canadian lumber sales into the United States. In addition, during 2015, we completed large capital projects at each of our lumber mills. These capital projects resulted in lower production volumes in 2015 due to down time taken during installation. Softwood Lumber Agreement After years of trade disputes over Canadian softwood lumber imports, the United States and Canada signed a Softwood Lumber Agreement in 2006, which expired in October 2015. The agreement established a system of tiered taxes and volume restrictions relating to Canadian lumber imports to the United States. Following expiration of the softwood lumber agreement, imports of Canadian lumber to the United States at lower prices increased, depressing U.S. lumber prices. On November 25, 2016, the U.S. lumber industry filed a petition seeking countervailing (CVD) and anti-dumping (AD) duties on Canadian lumber imports with the U.S. Department of Commerce. Final rulings on injury and CVD and AD duties went into effect on December 28, 2017. The combined CVD and AD duty to be paid by most Canadian exporters was established at 20.23%. The Canadians have commenced proceedings with the NAFTA appeals panel and the World Trade Organization appealing the imposition of the duties. In addition, the governments of the United States and Canada continue to state publicly their intention to reach a negotiated settlement of these trade cases. Pending merger with Deltic On October 22, 2017, Potlatch, Merger Sub and Deltic entered into a Merger Agreement pursuant to which Deltic will merge with and into Merger Sub. Information regarding the pending merger with Deltic is included in Part I - Item 1. Business - General. The merger is expected to close on February 20, 2018. CONSOLIDATED RESULTS The following table sets forth year-over-year changes in items included in our Consolidated Statements of Income. Our Business Segment Results provide a more detailed discussion of our segments. (Dollars in thousands) Revenues Costs and expenses: Cost of goods sold Selling, general and administrative expenses Environmental charges for Avery Landing Deltic merger-related costs Gain on lumber price swap Loss on sale of central Idaho timber and timberlands Operating income Interest expense, net Income before income taxes Income tax (provision) benefit Net income * Percentage change not meaningful. 2017 vs. 2016 13% 2% 7% * * * * (5%) * (7%) * * * 2016 vs. 2015 4% (2%) 11% * * * * 9% (40%) (12%) (75%) (22%) (66%) 2017 2016 $ 678,595 $ 599,099 $ 575,336 2015 470,365 462,304 470,037 46,392 — — — 51,697 1,022 — — 55,408 4,978 3,409 (1,088) — 48,522 — 533,072 563,545 516,429 58,907 145,523 (32,761) (27,049) 26,146 118,474 5,568 (32,021) $ 86,453 $ 10,938 $ 31,714 35,554 (28,941) 6,613 4,325 29 Revenues 2017 compared with 2016 Revenues increased $79.5 million, or 13%, due to 21% higher lumber sale prices and a 7% increase in lumber shipments, partially offset by a 5% decrease in harvest volumes. We sold 5,536 less acres, resulting in a 6% reduction in Real Estate revenue. 2016 compared with 2015 Revenues increased $23.8 million, or 4%, due to a 10% increase in lumber shipments, a 2% increase in lumber sales prices and 7,155 more acres sold. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in harvest volumes due to the sale of central Idaho timberlands. Cost of goods sold 2017 compared with 2016 Cost of goods sold increased 2% due to higher fiber and manufacturing costs due to increased manufacturing volumes, partially offset by a decrease in the average land basis of real estate sold due to geographic mix. 2016 compared with 2015 Cost of goods sold decreased 2% due to lower log and haul and depletion on reduced harvest volumes, partially offset by an increase in the average land basis of real estate sold due to geographic mix. Selling, general and administrative expenses 2017 compared with 2016 The increase of $3.7 million in selling, general and administrative expenses included higher annual cash incentive expense due to strong results and higher worker’s compensation expense, partially offset by lower pension expense resulting from updated mortality tables. Approximately 70% of selling, general and administrative expenses are considered Corporate, and not allocated to the segments. 2016 compared with 2015 The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses was a combination of annual cash incentive expense, which was absent in 2015, and higher pension expense resulting from lower discount rates as compared with the prior year. Other Environmental charges for Avery Landing During 2017, we accrued $5.0 million related to Avery Landing, compared with $1.0 million in 2016. See Note 16: Commitments and Contingencies for a more detailed discussion of Avery Landing. Deltic merger-related costs During 2017, we incurred costs directly attributable to the pending merger with Deltic include investment banking, legal, accounting, filing and appraisal fees, as well as other costs related to the pending merger. Gain on lumber price swap In April 2017, we entered into a lumber price swap to fix the price on a total of 36 million board feet of southern yellow pine with an effective date of July 1, 2017 and a termination date of December 31, 2017. Under the contract, beginning in July, cash settlements on 6 MMBF occurred monthly. We recognized $1.1 million in cash settlements on this swap over its term. See Note 10: Derivative Instruments for a more detailed discussion of the lumber price swap. Income taxes Income taxes are typically due to income or loss from Potlatch TRS. The TRS had income before tax of $59.5 million for 2017 and a loss before income tax of $14.0 million and $14.2 million for 2016 and 2015, respectively. 30 On December 22, 2017, the H.R. 1, Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was enacted that decreased the U.S. corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, repealed the domestic production deduction and altered taxation of executive compensation and employer provided benefits, as well as other changes. The TRS remeasured deferred tax assets and liabilities at the reduced tax rate, resulting in a $10.7 million charge to the provision. BUSINESS SEGMENT RESULTS Resource Segment (Dollars in thousands) Revenues1 Cost of goods sold: For the Years Ended December 31, 2015 2016 2017 $ 278,199 $ 256,163 $ 263,875 2017 vs. 2016 9% Logging and hauling Depreciation, depletion and amortization Other Selling, general and administrative expenses2 Operating income 117,827 20,476 27,121 165,424 6,670 $ 106,105 $ 117,583 24,090 26,086 167,759 6,486 81,918 $ 126,085 — 28,583 26,289 180,957 6,568 76,350 (15%) 4% (1%) 3% 30% 2016 vs. 2015 (3%) (7%) (16%) (1%) (7%) (1%) 7% Harvest Volumes (in tons) Northern region Sawlog Pulpwood Stumpage Total Southern region Sawlog Pulpwood Stumpage Total 1,711,588 1,809,288 1,992,965 194,902 23,574 1,870,117 2,022,294 2,211,441 146,402 12,127 194,414 18,592 853,377 933,228 736,333 1,168,225 1,115,647 1,127,561 321,172 2,142,604 2,213,225 2,185,066 244,201 41,151 (5%) (25%) (35%) (8%) (9%) — (21%) (9%) 9% 5% (83%) (3%) 16% (1%) (24%) 1% Total harvest volume 4,012,721 4,235,519 4,396,507 (5%) (4%) Sales Price/Unit ($ per ton) Northern region3 Sawlog Pulpwood Stumpage Southern region3 Sawlog Pulpwood Stumpage $ $ $ $ $ $ 111 $ 38 $ 13 $ 44 $ 30 $ 14 $ 90 $ 42 $ 13 $ 44 $ 32 $ 26 $ 87 42 23% (10%) 9 — 3% — 44% 43 — 33 19 (6%) (46%) 2% (3%) 37% 1 2 3 Prior to elimination of intersegment fiber revenues of $71.4 million, $57.1 million and $53.7 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. A portion of depreciation expense is included in selling, general and administrative expenses. Sawlog and pulpwood sale prices are on a delivered basis, which include contracted logging and hauling costs charged to the customer. Stumpage sales provide our customers the right to harvest standing timber. As such, the customer contracts the logging and hauling and bears such costs. 31 Revenues 2017 compared with 2016 Resource segment revenues increased 9% due to strong sawlog prices in the Northern region, partially offset by lower harvest volumes in both regions. Northern region sawlog prices increased 23% due to indexed lumber prices, higher cedar pricing and a greater mix of cedar. The decrease in 2017 Northern region sawlog volumes was primarily the result of the sale of central Idaho timberlands in the second quarter of 2016. Northern region pulpwood sales were down 25% due to trucking shortages. Scheduled harvest volumes of sawlogs and pulpwood in the Southern region increased 9% and 5%, respectively. A higher mix of hardwood sawlogs offset lower prices for pine sawlogs. Pulpwood prices decreased 6% due to high pulp mill inventories. Stumpage prices fluctuated based on the mix of pulpwood and sawlog volume. 2016 compared with 2015 Revenues decreased 3% due to a 4% reduction in harvest volumes that resulted from the sale of central Idaho timberlands in the second quarter of 2016. Central Idaho represented 5% of harvest volumes in 2015. Excluding central Idaho, the Northern region’s harvest volumes were relatively flat, consistent with planned harvest volumes. Higher Northern region sawlog prices were the result of a 10% increase in cedar prices and an increase in cedar mix. Harvest volumes in our Southern region were also relatively flat, with a shift to a higher proportion of delivered sawlog sales and fewer stumpage sales. Sawlog prices increased due to a slight lift in hardwood prices. Pulpwood prices declined for both hardwood and pine due to full pulp mill inventories. Cost of Goods Sold 2017 compared with 2016 Logging and hauling expense was flat due to higher delivered harvest volumes in the Southern region offset by lower harvest volumes in the Northern region. Stumpage sales do not include logging and hauling. A 15% decrease in depreciation, depletion and amortization expense was the result of a 5% decrease in harvest volumes and lower harvest volumes on leased acres. Leased acres are primarily located in Alabama and the related timber has a higher cost basis. 2016 compared with 2015 The decrease in harvest volumes resulted in lower logging, hauling and depletion expense. Lower diesel prices resulted in slightly lower hauling rates. 32 Wood Products Segment (Dollars in thousands) Revenues Cost of goods sold1: Fiber costs Freight, logging and hauling Manufacturing costs Finished goods inventory change Selling, general and administrative expenses Gain on lumber price swap Operating income (loss) Lumber shipments (MBF)2 Lumber sales prices ($ per MBF)2 For the Years Ended December 31, 2015 2016 2017 $ 441,157 $ 367,426 $ 336,214 (1,159) 50,929 48,410 182,090 165,585 163,985 42,661 132,486 127,086 127,998 1,548 364,346 337,427 336,192 5,257 — (5,235) 5,412 — $ 72,166 $ 24,587 $ 5,733 (1,088) (3,654) 736,667 688,229 626,630 346 $ 352 $ 425 $ 2017 vs. 2016 20% 2016 vs. 2015 9% 10% 5% 4% * 8% 6% * * 1% 13% (1%) * — 3% * * 7% 21% 10% 2% 1 Prior to elimination of intersegment fiber costs of $71.4 million, $57.1 million and $53.7 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. 2 MBF stands for thousand board feet. * Percentage change not meaningful. Revenues 2017 compared with 2016 Revenues increased $73.7 million due to higher lumber sales realization and a 7% increase in lumber shipments. 2016 compared with 2015 Revenues increased $31.2 million due to higher lumber shipments and slightly improved lumber sales prices. Lumber shipments in 2015 were impacted by mill down time for the completion of capital projects and downtime taken at certain mills near year end to balance supply and demand. The increase in lumber prices included the impact of a higher percentage of premium grade lumber resulting from the 2015 capital projects. Cost of Goods Sold 2017 compared with 2016 Cost of goods sold increased due to the following factors: • Fiber costs increased 10% due to elevated production volumes and higher per unit log costs, particularly in Idaho where sawlog prices are indexed to lumber prices. • Freight costs increased as a result of higher lumber shipments. • Manufacturing costs, such as wages, repairs and maintenance, increased 4% due to higher production volumes. • Finished goods inventory fluctuates based on a combination of production volume, fiber costs, manufacturing costs and shipments. 2016 compared with 2015 Cost of goods sold fluctuated due to the following factors: • Fiber costs increased $1.6 million, or 1%. Increased use of fiber due to higher production volume was substantially offset by lower per unit log costs in most of our mills, as well as increased lumber recovery. • Freight costs increased as a result of residual hauling costs that were previously the responsibility of the customer. These costs were $5.2 million and were billed to the customer and included in revenue. Higher lumber shipments also increased freight costs. 33 • Manufacturing costs declined 1% in 2016. The increased cost associated with higher production volume in 2016 was more than offset by lower maintenance expense. We also had 11 days of downtime at our St. Maries, Idaho sawmill in the first quarter of 2016 due to log shortages resulting from an unseasonably warm winter that caused unfavorable hauling conditions. • Finished goods inventory fluctuates based on a combination of production volume, fiber costs, manufacturing costs and shipments. Real Estate Segment (Dollars in thousands) Revenues Cost of goods sold: Basis of real estate sold Other Selling, general and administrative expenses Loss on sale of central Idaho timber and timberlands Operating income (loss) * Percentage change not meaningful Higher and better use (HBU) Rural real estate Non-strategic timberland Central Idaho timberland Total For the Years Ended December 31, 2015 2016 2017 $ 30,655 $ 32,604 $ 28,989 7,114 2,182 9,296 2,783 8,518 2,490 11,008 2,569 7,394 2,519 9,913 2,227 — $ 18,576 $ (29,495) $ 16,849 48,522 — 2017 vs. 2016 (6%) (16%) (12%) (16%) 8% * * 2016 vs. 2015 12% 15% (1%) 11% 15% * * 2017 2016 2015 Average Average Price/Acre Price/Acre Acres Sold Acres Sold Acres Average Sold Price/Acre 6,440 $ 2,505 5,267 $ 2,338 4,599 $ 3,340 9,993 $ 1,394 12,911 $ 1,246 9,036 $ 1,329 900 17,007 $ 1,803 22,543 $ 1,446 15,388 $ 1,881 665 — 756 15,388 $ 1,881 — 171,598 $ 17,007 $ 1,803 194,141 $ 963 1,753 $ 574 $ 1,033 4,365 $ — $ — $ 2017 compared with 2016 During 2017, we sold 17,007 acres, which included a large conservation sale in Alabama. In 2016, we sold 22,543 acres, which also included a large conservation sale in Alabama, in addition to the sale of central Idaho timberlands. The average price per acre fluctuates based on both the geographic area of the real estate and the product mix. In the second quarter of 2016, we sold approximately 172,000 acres of timberlands located in central Idaho for $114 million, resulting in a loss of $48.5 million before tax. We purchased the property in 2007 and 2008 for the purpose of growing and harvesting timber and selling rural recreational parcels. The sale freed up capital without having to wait for the rural recreation real estate market in central Idaho to recover. 2016 compared with 2015 Excluding the sale of central Idaho, we sold 7,155 more acres in 2016, compared with 2015, at a lower weighted average sales price. The average sales price per acre was higher in 2015 largely due to the sale of two commercial real estate sites included in HBU, as well as geographic mix. 34 Liquidity and Capital Resources Overview Higher lumber prices contributed to higher revenues and net income resulting in an increase in cash and cash equivalents of $37.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. We also increased the quarterly dividend from $0.375 per share to $0.40 per share beginning in the fourth quarter of 2017. Investing activities in 2017 included capital projects at our lumber mills and the acquisition of timber and timberlands. Cash Flows from Operating Activities 2017 compared with 2016 Net cash provided by operating activities was $162.7 million in 2017, compared with $102.1 million in 2016. The increase of $60.6 million was primarily the result of the following: • Cash received from customers increased $86.8 million, primarily due to higher lumber sale prices and increased lumber shipments in 2017 over 2016. A more detailed discussion of revenues is included in Business Segment Results. • Cash paid for interest decreased $1.9 million due to reductions in long-term debt. The following partially offset the increases in 2017: • Income tax payments were $15.8 million in 2017, compared with tax refunds of $8.1 million in 2016. As a result of the loss on sale of central Idaho timberlands in the second quarter of 2016, we received a $5.5 million tax refund. In addition, during 2016 we received $2.1 million from estimated tax payments made in 2015 and $0.5 million from the carryback of certain tax credits. • Cash contributions to our qualified pension plans were $4.0 million higher in 2017. 2016 compared with 2015 Net cash provided by operating activities was $102.1 million in 2016, compared with $74.0 million in 2015. The increase of $28.1 million was primarily the result of the following: • Cash received from customers increased $23.9 million, primarily due to increased lumber shipments and more acres sold by our Real Estate segment in 2016 over 2015, excluding the central Idaho timber and timberland sale. A more detailed discussion of revenues is included in Business Segment Results. • Net cash inflows related to income taxes were $8.1 million in 2016, compared with outflows of $1.6 million in 2015. As a result of the loss on sale of central Idaho timberlands in the second quarter of 2016, we received a $5.5 million tax refund. In addition, during 2016 we received $2.1 million from estimated tax payments made in 2015 and $0.5 million from the carryback of certain tax credits. • Cash paid for interest decreased $1.6 million due to reductions in long-term debt. The following partially offset the increases in 2016: • Cash paid to employees and suppliers increased $5.8 million primarily due to costs for freight, logging and hauling attributable to the 10% increase in lumber shipments. • Cash contributions to our qualified pension plans were $1.3 million in 2016. We did not make a qualified pension plan contribution in 2015. Net Cash Flows from Investing Activities Net cash used in investing activities was $50.0 million in 2017, compared with net cash provided by investing activities of $93.4 million in 2016 and $33.6 million used by investing activities in 2015. • • In 2017, we used $28.1 million for capital expenditures and $22.0 million for the acquisition of timber and timberlands. In 2016, the net proceeds from the sale of central Idaho timber and timberlands were $111.5 million, partially offset by $19.3 million used for capital expenditures. 35 • In 2015, we used $32.7 million for capital expenditures and $10.2 million for the acquisition of timber and timberlands, partially offset by $7.0 million provided by short-term investments. During 2015, we completed large capital projects at each of our lumber mills. Net Cash Flows from Financing Activities Net cash used in financing activities was $74.8 million in 2017, $120.8 million in 2016 and $56.5 million in 2015. • Net cash used in financing activities in 2017 was primarily attributable to $11.0 million in long-term debt repayments and $61.9 million of dividends to stockholders. • Net cash used in financing activities in 2016 was primarily attributable to the $42.6 million repayment of Minnesota revenue bonds, $60.8 million of dividends to stockholders and $6.0 million in the repurchase of common stock. We refinanced debt of $93.2 million at attractive interest rates. • In 2015, we paid dividends to stockholders, which totaled $61.0 million and repaid $22.5 million of debentures. This was partially offset by $30.0 million provided by our revolving line of credit. Future Cash Requirements Due to the pending merger with Deltic, in December 2017, our Board of Directors approved a partial-year budget. We anticipate we will spend $9 million for capital expenditures through the first quarter of 2018. Our capital spending will primarily be related to reforestation expenditures, logging road construction and general replacement and improvement projects in our wood products manufacturing facilities. A full-year post-merger budget is expected to be approved by our Board of Directors in mid-February 2018. We expect to close the merger with Deltic on February 20, 2018 and issue approximately 22 million shares of our common stock. To complete the conversion of Deltic to a REIT, we will also pay a special dividend in the fourth quarter, estimated to be $250 million consisting of $50 million in cash and the remainder in stock. During 2018, we expect to pay approximately $30 million in non-recurring costs directly attributable to the merger, including investment banking, legal, accounting, filing and appraisal fees, as well as termination costs related to duplicate executive and non-executive employees. In the first quarter of 2018, we repaid $14.3 million in maturing medium-term notes. Minimum required contributions to defined benefit plans were temporarily reduced for plan years 2013 through approximately 2021 as a result of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 (BBA 2015), which extended the Highway and Transportation Funding Act (HAFTA) of 2014 and Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP- 21). For us, this pension relief reduced required contributions to zero through the 2016 plan year. Declining pension plan interest rates have reduced the effectiveness of the relief. In 2018, without considering the post- merger impact of Deltic, we expect to make minimum funding contribution to our qualified pension plans totaling $10.1 million. From 2019 to 2025, we expect to make minimum funding contributions totaling $41 million, with no additional minimum funding contributions required subsequent to 2025. As a result of 2017’s actual return on plan assets, expected minimum funding requirements decreased from previous estimates. We expect to fund a majority of our 2018 annual cash dividends using the cash flows from our REIT-qualifying timberland operations and from cash and cash equivalents on hand. While maintaining compliance with the limits imposed by our REIT status, we may also utilize cash dividends from Potlatch TRS to fund our cash dividends. In particular, at least 75% of our gross income for each taxable year as a REIT must be derived from sales of our standing timber and other types of real estate income. No more than 25% of our gross income may consist of dividends from Potlatch TRS and other non-qualifying types of income. This requirement may limit our ability to receive dividends from Potlatch TRS and may impact our ability to fund dividends to stockholders using cash flows from Potlatch TRS. Sources of Financing Credit Agreement On August 12, 2014, we entered into an amended and restated credit agreement with an expiration date of February 12, 2020. This credit agreement provided for a revolving line of credit with an initial aggregate principal amount not to exceed $250 million, which may be increased by up to an additional $250 million, subject to certain 36 conditions and agreement of the lenders. It also included a sublimit of $40 million for the issuance of standby letters of credit and a sublimit of $15 million for swing line loans. Usage under either or both subfacilities reduces availability under the revolving line of credit. At December 31, 2017, there were no borrowings outstanding under the revolving line of credit and approximately $0.9 million of the letter of credit subfacility was being used to support outstanding standby letters of credit. Available borrowing capacity as of December 31, 2017 was $249.1 million. On February 14, 2018, we entered into a second amended and restated credit agreement (the Amended Credit Agreement) with an expiration date of April 14, 2023. The Amended Credit Agreement increases our revolving line of credit to $380 million, which may be increased by up to an additional $420 million. It also includes a sublimit of $75 million for the issuance of standby letters of credit and a sublimit of $25 million for swing line loans. Usage under either or both subfacilities reduces availability under the revolving line of credit. Pricing is consistent with the 2014 amended and restated credit agreement. The interest coverage ratio and leverage ratio financial covenants are unchanged. The limitation on timberland acre sales was eliminated. Upon closing of the merger with Deltic, we intend to repay their outstanding borrowings under their revolving credit agreement of approximately $100 million utilizing this Amended Credit Agreement, with the intention of refinancing such borrowings utilizing our term loan agreement. We also intend to assume approximately $29.7 million of Deltic obligations under a letter of credit agreement relating to Union County, Arkansas Industrial Development Revenue Bonds and $100 million of Deltic term loans. We may also utilize borrowings under the Amended Credit Agreement to, among other things, refinance existing indebtedness and provide funding for working capital requirements, capital projects, acquisitions and other general corporate expenditures. The Amended Credit Agreement contains certain covenants that limit our ability and that of our subsidiaries to create liens, merge or consolidate, dispose of assets, incur indebtedness and guarantees, repurchase or redeem capital stock and indebtedness, make certain investments or acquisitions, enter into certain transactions with affiliates or change the nature of our business. The Amended Credit Agreement also contains financial maintenance covenants including the maintenance of a minimum interest coverage ratio and a maximum leverage ratio. We will be permitted to pay dividends to our stockholders under the terms of the Amended Credit Agreement so long as we expect to remain in compliance with the financial maintenance covenants. Term Loans In December 2014, we entered into an amended and restated term loan agreement. The amended term loan agreement provided additional term loan facilities of $310 million to fund the acquisition of timberlands in Alabama and Mississippi. In February 2016, an additional tranche was added to refinance $27.5 million of long-term debt that matured in December 2015 and February 2016. A $6.0 million tranche matured and was repaid in December 2017. The amended term loan agreement totaling $343.5 million contains covenants similar to the 2014 amended and restated credit agreement. Senior Notes In 2009, we sold $150 million aggregate principal amount of 7.5% senior notes. The terms of these notes limit our ability and the ability of any subsidiary guarantors, to borrow money, pay dividends, redeem or repurchase capital stock, enter into sale and leaseback transactions and create liens. Dividends and the repurchase of our capital stock, are permitted as follows: • We may use 100% of our Funds Available for Distribution (FAD), for the period January 1, 2010 through the end of the quarter preceding the payment date, less cumulative restricted payments previously made from FAD during that period, to make restricted payments. Our cumulative FAD less our dividends paid was $237.4 million as of December 31, 2017. • • If our cumulative FAD, less cumulative restricted payments previously made from FAD, is insufficient to cover a restricted payment, then we are permitted to make payments from a basket amount, which was approximately $90.1 million as of December 31, 2017. If our cumulative FAD less our aggregate restricted payments made from FAD is insufficient to cover a restricted payment and we have depleted the basket, we may still make a restricted payment, so long as, after giving effect to the payment, our ratio of indebtedness to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, depletion, amortization and basis of real estate sold, or EBITDDA, from continuing operations for the preceding four full fiscal quarters does not exceed 4.25 to 1.00. 37 FAD, as defined in the indenture governing the senior notes, is earnings from continuing operations, plus depreciation, depletion and amortization, plus basis of real estate sold and minus capital expenditures. For purposes of this definition, capital expenditures exclude all expenditures relating to direct or indirect timberland purchases in excess of $5 million. Financial Covenants The table below sets forth the financial covenants in the 2014 amended and restated credit agreement and term loan agreement and our status with respect to these covenants as of December 31, 2017: Interest Coverage Ratio Leverage Ratio Allowable acres that may be sold1 Covenant Requirement 3.00 to 1.00 ≥ 40% ≤ 480,000 Actual At December 31, 201 7 6.86 23% 1 Acres sold under the credit and term loan agreements were 233,358 and 16,059, respectively, as of December 31, 2017. The term loan agreement allows for an exclusion of up to 250,000 acres sold in the fiscal years ending December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2017. The Amended Credit Agreement eliminates the limitation on timberland acre sales. The Interest Coverage Ratio is EBITDDA, which is defined as net income adjusted for interest expense, income taxes, depreciation, depletion and amortization, the basis of real estate sold and non-cash equity compensation expense, divided by interest expense for the same period. The Leverage Ratio is our Total Funded Indebtedness divided by our Total Asset Value. Our Total Funded Indebtedness consists of our long-term debt, including any current portion of long-term debt, revolving line of credit borrowings, plus the total amount outstanding under the letter of credit subfacility. Our Total Asset Value, per the 2014 amended and restated credit agreement and term loan agreement, is defined as the value of our timberlands, the book basis of our wood products manufacturing facilities, cash and cash equivalents and the cash value of our company-owned life insurance (COLI). The book basis of our Wood Products manufacturing facilities and the cash value of our COLI are each limited to 5% of Total Asset Value. The definition of our Total Asset Value under the Amended Credit Agreement has been revised to increase the limit on the book basis of our Wood Products manufacturing facilities from 5% to 10%. In addition, Total Asset Value now includes the book basis of Construction In Progress (limited to 10% of Total Asset Value) and a Pro Rata Share of Investment Affiliates (limited to 15% of Total Asset Value). Construction in Progress means, as of any date, (a) the construction of a new operating facility or (b) an expansion with greater than $10 million of capital expenditures to an existing facility. Investment Affiliate means any person in which any member of the Consolidated Parties, directly or indirectly, has an ownership interest, whose financial results are not consolidated into our financial statements. The inclusion of cash and cash equivalents and the limitation on the cash value of our COLI remain the same. Tax Reform As a REIT, we generally are not subject to federal and state corporate income taxes on income from investments in real estate that we distribute to our shareholders. We are required to pay federal and state corporate income taxes on income from our non-real estate investments which are held in taxable REIT subsidiaries (TRS). These activities are principally comprised of our wood products manufacturing operations and certain real estate investments held for sale. As discussed in Business Results, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act decreased the U.S. corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%. Had the new tax rules been in place during 2017, our income tax expense would have been $5.4 million lower. 38 Dividends to Shareholders The following table summarizes the historical tax characteristics of dividends to shareholders for the years ended December 31: (Amounts per share) Capital gain dividends Non-taxable return of capital Total dividends 2017 2016 2015 $ $ 1.525 $ — 1.525 $ 1.50 $ — 1.50 $ 1.28 0.22 1.50 In October 2017, concurrent with the announcement of the Deltic merger, our Board of Directors declared a dividend of $0.40 per share for the fourth quarter of 2017, which was a 7% increase relative to the prior quarterly dividend of $0.375 per share. Credit Ratings Two major debt rating agencies routinely evaluate our debt and our cost of borrowing can increase or decrease depending on our credit rating. In October 2017, Moody’s changed the outlook of our debt rating of 'Ba1' from Stable to Rating Under Review for Upgrade, following our announcement of the Deltic merger. Also in October, Standard & Poors updated their outlook related to our BB+ rating on our debt from Stable to Positive. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements We had no off-balance sheet financing agreements or guarantees as defined by Item 303 of Regulation S-K as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 that we believe are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. Contractual Obligations The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2017: (Dollars in thousands) Long-term debt1 Interest on long-term debt2 Operating leases3 Purchase obligations4 Other long-term liabilities5 Total Payments Due by Period Total Within 1 Year 2-3 Years 4-5 Years More Than 5 Years $ 576,485 $ 14,250 $ 236,000 $ 83,000 $ 243,235 15,023 992 — 1,121 $ 724,523 $ 71,233 $ 280,515 $ 112,404 $ 260,371 93,533 14,387 21,893 18,225 20,425 2,645 5,652 682 24,247 4,570 12,426 15,740 33,838 6,180 3,815 682 1 2 3 4 5 See Note 9: Debt in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Amounts presented for interest payments assume that all long-term debt outstanding as of December 31, 2017 will remain outstanding until maturity and interest rates on variable rate debt in effect as of December 31, 2017 will remain in effect until maturity. Estimated cash flows related to interest rate swaps are also included in this category. See Note 16: Commitments and Contingencies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Purchase obligations primarily include open purchase orders for goods or services that are legally binding on us and that specify fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased. Purchase obligations exclude arrangements that we can cancel without penalty. We have not included the termination fee that would be payable by Potlatch in the event Potlatch terminates the Merger Agreement, as disclosed in Note 2: Pending Merger with Deltic in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Other long-term liabilities consist of certain employee-related obligations. We estimate that we will make qualified and non-qualified pension plan and other postretirement employee benefit plan payments of $15.4 million in 2018. Due to the uncertainty of payment timing and amounts, we have not included estimated payments for pension and post retirement funding beyond 2018, Idaho cost share roads, deferred compensation and unrecognized tax benefits. Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates Our accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, which require management to make estimates that affect the amounts 39 of revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities reported. The following are critical accounting policies and estimates, which are both very important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and which require some of management’s most difficult, subjective and complex judgments. The accounting for these matters involves forming estimates based on current facts, circumstances and assumptions which, in management’s judgment, could change in a manner that would materially affect management’s future estimates with respect to such matters and, accordingly, could cause our future reported financial condition and results of operations to differ materially from financial results reported based on management’s current estimates. Timber and timberlands. We record depletion expense as timber is harvested by applying depletion rates to the volume of timber harvested. We establish depletion rates annually by dividing the cost of merchantable timber by estimated merchantable timber volume. Our estimate of merchantable timber volume does not include anticipated future growth. The estimated merchantable timber volume is updated at least annually to reflect increases due to the reclassification of pre-production timber to merchantable timber when it meets defined diameter specifications, the acquisition of additional merchantable timber, decreases due to timber harvests and land sales and changes resulting from other factors, such as environmental or casualty losses. Our estimates of merchantable timber volume are subject to judgments that could significantly affect volume estimates and the use of different assumptions for volume estimates could have a significant effect upon amounts reported in our Consolidated Financial Statements. A decrease in the estimated merchantable timber volume, all other assumptions remaining the same, would increase depletion expense. A 5% decrease in the estimated merchantable timber for all depletion pools would increase 2017 depletion expense by approximately $1 million. For a further discussion of our accounting policies for timber and timberlands, see Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Contingent liabilities. We are subject to lawsuits, investigations and other claims related to environmental, product and other matters, and are required to assess the likelihood of any adverse judgments or outcomes to these matters, as well as potential ranges of probable losses. We record contingent liabilities when it becomes probable that we will have to make payments and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. Assessing probability and estimating losses requires analysis of multiple factors, including historical experience, judgments about the potential actions of third-party claimants and courts and recommendations of legal counsel. In addition to contingent liabilities recorded for probable losses, we disclose contingent liabilities when there is a reasonable possibility that an ultimate loss may occur. Recorded contingent liabilities are based on the best information available and actual losses in any future period are inherently uncertain. If estimated probable future losses or actual losses exceed our recorded liability for such claims, we would record additional charges. These exposures and proceedings can be significant, and the ultimate negative outcomes could be material to our financial position, operating results or cash flow in any given quarter or year. See Note 16: Commitments and Contingencies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information. Pension and postretirement employee benefits. The determination of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit expense, funded status and the requirements for funding our pension plans are based on a number of actuarial assumptions that require judgment. Different assumptions would change the net periodic pension and postretirement benefit expense and the funded status of the benefit plans. For a discussion of our accounting policies, assumptions and sensitivity of such assumptions, see Note 12: Savings Plans, Pension Plans and Other Postretirement Employee Benefits in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. PROSPECTIVE ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS See new accounting pronouncements in Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. 40 ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK Our market risk exposure on financial instruments includes interest rate risk on our bank credit facility, term loans and interest rate swap agreements. All market risk sensitive instruments were entered into for purposes other than trading purposes. We do not attempt to hedge our exposure to interest rate risk for our cash equivalents. The interest rates applied to borrowings under our credit facility adjust often and therefore react quickly to any movement in the general trend of market interest rates. We do not attempt to mitigate the effects of short-term interest rate fluctuations on our credit facility borrowings through the use of derivative financial instruments. There were no borrowings under our credit facility at December 31, 2017. We are exposed to interest rate risk through our variable rate debt instruments. At December 31, 2017, we had four separate interest rate swaps with notional amounts totaling $41.8 million. We have three fair value interest rate swaps, which convert interest payments with fixed rates of 8.88% and 8.89% to a variable rate of 3-month LIBOR plus a spread of 6.17%. Our fair value swaps terminate at various dates in the first quarter of 2018. We have one cash flow hedge, which converts a variable rate debt instrument of 2.15% plus 3-month LIBOR to a fixed rate of 3.88% and terminates in February 2026. See Note 10: Derivative Instruments in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. Quantitative Information about Market Risks The following table summarizes our outstanding debt, interest rate swaps and average interest rates as of December 31, 2017: (Dollars in thousands) Variable rate debt: Principal due $ Average interest rate Fixed rate debt: Principal due Average interest rate Interest rate swaps: Fixed to variable Average pay rate Average receive rate Variable to fixed $ Average pay rate Average receive rate 2018 Expected Maturity Date 2019 2020 2021 2022 Thereafter Total Fair Value — $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 3.75% 4.08% $ 4.13% — $ 27,500 $ 147,500 $147,501 4.55% 4.09% $14,250 $150,000 8.88% 7.50% $ 6,000 $ 3.70% — $ 43,000 $ 215,735 $ 428,985 $440,978 4.60% 4.04% 5.46% $14,250 $ 8.46% — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 14,250 $ 8.46% 13 8.88% $ — — $ — $ — $ — $ 27,500 $ 27,500 1,156 8.88% $ 1.73% 1.73% 2.40% 2.40% A hypothetical increase or decrease of 50 and 100 basis points (BPS) related to our interest rate swap agreements would have the following effects on fair value: (Dollars in thousands) Maturing in: 2018 2026 Total Notional Amoun t Current +50 BPS +100 BPS -50 BPS -100 BPS Interest Rate Swap Agreements - Fair Value1 $ $ 24 $ 14,250 $ 27,500 3,009 41,750 $ 1,191 $ 2,132 $ 3,033 $ 24 $ 2,108 24 $ 1,167 24 $ 185 209 $ 24 (842) (818) 1 Fair value for this table is calculated on a termination value basis. Accrued interest is included and a credit value adjustment, which is used for GAAP purposes, is excluded. 41 ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM To the Stockholders and Board of Directors Potlatch Corporation: Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Potlatch Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, cash flows, and stockholders’ equity for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2017, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated February 16, 2018 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Basis for Opinion These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1952. /s/ KPMG LLP Seattle, Washington February 16, 2018 42 POTLATCH CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES Consolidated Statements of Income (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) Revenues Costs and expenses: Cost of goods sold Selling, general and administrative expenses Environmental charges for Avery Landing Deltic merger-related costs Gain on lumber price swap Loss on sale of central Idaho timber and timberlands Operating income Interest expense, net Income before income taxes Income tax (provision) benefit Net income Net income per share: Basic Diluted Dividends per share Weighted-average shares outstanding (in thousands) Basic Diluted $ $ $ $ $ For the Years Ended December 31, 2016 599,099 $ 2017 678,595 $ 2015 575,336 470,365 55,408 4,978 3,409 (1,088) — 533,072 145,523 (27,049) 118,474 (32,021) 86,453 $ 462,304 51,697 1,022 — — 48,522 563,545 35,554 (28,941) 6,613 4,325 10,938 $ 470,037 46,392 — — — — 516,429 58,907 (32,761) 26,146 5,568 31,714 2.12 $ 2.10 $ 1.525 $ 0.27 $ 0.27 $ 1.50 $ 0.78 0.77 1.50 40,824 41,227 40,798 41,033 40,842 40,988 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 43 POTLATCH CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Dollars in thousands) For the Years Ended December 31, 2016 2015 2017 Net income Other comprehensive income, net of tax: Pension and other postretirement employee benefits: $ 86,453 $ 10,938 $ 31,714 Net gain (loss) arising during the period, net of tax expense (benefit) of $3,990, $(1,826) and $(1,913) Amortization of actuarial loss included in net periodic cost, net of tax expense of $6,248, $7,042 and $7,794 Amortization of prior service credit included in net periodic cost, net of tax benefit of $(3,350), $(3,260) and $(3,396) Cash flow hedge, net of tax of $3, $448, and $- Other comprehensive income, net of tax Comprehensive income $ 11,355 (2,857) (2,990) 9,773 11,014 12,190 (5,239) 4 15,893 102,346 $ (5,099) 701 3,759 14,697 $ (5,311) — 3,889 35,603 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 44 POTLATCH CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES Consolidated Balance Sheets (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) ASSETS Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents $ Customer receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $260 and $510 Inventories Other current assets Total current assets Property, plant and equipment, net Timber and timberlands, net Deferred tax assets, net Other long-term assets Total assets LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY Current liabilities: Current portion of long-term debt Accounts payable and accrued liabilities Current portion of pension and other postretirement employee benefits Total current liabilities Long-term debt Pension and other postretirement employee benefits Other long-term obligations Total liabilities Commitments and contingencies Stockholders’ equity: $ $ At December 31, 2017 2016 120,457 $ 11,240 50,132 11,478 193,307 77,229 654,476 19,796 8,271 953,079 $ 82,584 14,842 52,622 13,597 163,645 72,820 641,856 42,051 7,309 927,681 14,263 $ 55,201 5,334 74,798 559,056 103,524 15,159 752,537 11,032 43,710 5,839 60,581 572,956 123,284 14,586 771,407 Preferred stock, authorized 4,000,000 shares, no shares issued Common stock, $1 par value, authorized 100,000,000 shares, issued 40,611,991 and 40,519,351 shares Additional paid-in capital Accumulated deficit Accumulated other comprehensive loss Total stockholders’ equity Total liabilities and stockholders' equity — — 40,612 359,144 (104,363) (94,851) 200,542 953,079 $ 40,519 355,274 (128,775) (110,744) 156,274 927,681 $ The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 45 POTLATCH CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Dollars in thousands) For the Years Ended December 31, 2016 2015 2017 $ 86,453 $ 10,938 $ 31,714 CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES Net income Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities: Depreciation, depletion and amortization Basis of real estate sold Change in deferred taxes Pension and other postretirement employee benefits Equity-based compensation expense Loss on sale of central Idaho timber and timberlands Other, net Change in: Receivables Inventories Other assets Accounts payable and accrued liabilities Other liabilities Funding of qualified pension plans Net cash from operating activities CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES Change in short-term investments Transfer from company owned life insurance (COLI) Transfer to COLI Purchase of property, plant and equipment Timberlands reforestation and roads Acquisition of timber and timberlands Net proceeds from sale of central Idaho timber and timberlands Other, net Net cash from investing activities CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES Dividends to common stockholders Repurchase of common stock Revolving line of credit (repayment) borrowings Repayment of long-term debt Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt Other, net Net cash from financing activities Change in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year Cash and cash equivalents at end of year SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION Cash paid (received) during the year for: Interest, net of amounts capitalized Income taxes, net $ $ $ 29,912 6,827 15,364 13,151 4,722 — (1,872) 3,602 2,490 (15) 11,591 (4,291) (5,275) 162,659 — 1,278 (1,324) (12,855) (15,207) (22,043) — 131 (50,020) (61,931) — — (11,000) — (1,835) (74,766) 37,873 82,584 120,457 $ 34,190 8,011 1,853 15,661 4,390 48,522 (1,198) (3,712) (17,460) (473) 7,232 (4,537) (1,300) 102,117 — 6,384 (3,967) (5,866) (13,422) (1,244) 111,460 6 93,351 (60,842) (5,956) (30,000) (113,335) 93,235 (3,911) (120,809) 74,659 7,925 82,584 $ 38,105 7,012 (5,696) 15,122 4,758 — (2,046) (3,864) (3,672) 898 267 (8,584) — 74,014 6,995 1,492 — (18,987) (13,745) (10,230) — 886 (33,589) (61,017) — 30,000 (22,500) — (3,000) (56,517) (16,092) 24,017 7,925 26,125 $ 15,845 $ 28,051 $ (8,081) $ 29,676 1,576 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 46 POTLATCH CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) Common Stock Balance, December 31, 2014 Performance shares and restricted stock units Net income Director deferred stock awards Pension plans and OPEB obligations Transfer of assets from REIT to subsidiary Common dividends, $1.50 per share Balance, December 31, 2015 Performance shares and restricted stock units Net income Director deferred stock awards Pension plans and OPEB obligations Repurchase of common stock Cash flow hedge Common dividends, $1.50 per share Balance, December 31, 2016 Performance shares and restricted stock units Net income Director deferred stock awards Pension plans and OPEB obligations Cash flow hedge Common dividends, $1.525 per share Balance, December 31, 2017 Shares Amount 40,605,179 $40,605 $ Additional Paid - in Capital Accumulated Deficit Accumulated Othe r Comprehensive Loss Total Stockholders ' Equity 346,441 $ (43,588) $ (118,392) $ 225,066 76 75,534 — — — — — — — — — — 40,680,713 $40,681 $ 8 8,263 — — — — — — (170) (169,625) — — — — 40,519,351 $40,519 $ 93 92,640 — — — — — — — — — — 40,611,991 $40,612 $ 3,406 — 701 — (7) — 350,541 $ (92) 31,714 — — — (61,017) (72,983) $ 4,065 — 668 — — — — (102) 10,938 — — (5,786) — (60,842) 355,274 $ (128,775) $ 3,452 — 418 — — — (110) 86,453 — — — (61,931) 359,144 $ (104,363) $ — — — 3,889 — — (114,503) $ — — — 3,058 — 701 — (110,744) $ — — — 15,889 4 — (94,851) $ 3,390 31,714 701 3,889 (7) (61,017) 203,736 3,971 10,938 668 3,058 (5,956) 701 (60,842) 156,274 3,435 86,453 418 15,889 4 (61,931) 200,542 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 47 POTLATCH CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES GENERAL We are primarily engaged in activities associated with timberland management, including the sale of timber, the management of approximately 1.4 million acres of timberlands and the purchase and sale of timberlands. We are also engaged in the manufacture and sale of wood products. Our timberlands and all of our wood products facilities are located within the continental United States. The primary market for our products is the United States. We converted to a Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) effective January 1, 2006. CONSOLIDATION The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Potlatch Corporation and its subsidiaries after the elimination of intercompany transactions and accounts. There are no unconsolidated subsidiaries. SIGNIFICANT ESTIMATES The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which we refer to in this report as U.S. GAAP, requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates and assumptions. Significant estimates include timber volumes, pension and postretirement obligation assumptions, contingent liabilities and the fair value of derivative instruments. These significant estimates are described in further detail below. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS Cash equivalents are investments that are highly liquid with maturities of three months or less when purchased. INVENTORIES For most of our operations, the last-in, first-out method is used to determine the cost of logs, lumber and plywood. The average cost method is used to determine the cost of all other inventories. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Expenses associated with idle capacity or other curtailments of production are reflected in cost of goods sold in the periods incurred. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT Property, plant and equipment are valued at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation of buildings, equipment and other depreciable assets is determined using the straight-line method of depreciation. Major improvements and replacements of property are capitalized. Maintenance, repairs and minor improvements and replacements are expensed. Upon retirement or other disposition of property, applicable cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts. Any gains or losses are included in earnings. TIMBER AND TIMBERLANDS Timber and timberlands are valued at cost less accumulated depletion and amortization. We capitalize costs related to stand establishment, which include the preparation of the land for planting, seeds or seedlings and tree planting costs, which include third-party labor costs, materials and other contract services. Upon completion of 48 planting activities and field inspection to confirm the planting operation was successful, a plantation will be considered “established.” Subsequent expenditures to maintain the integrity or enhance the growth of an established plantation or stand are expensed. Post-establishment expenses include vegetation control, fertilization, thinning operations and the replanting of seedlings lost through mortality. Forest management costs are considered current operating expenses and include property taxes and insurance, silviculture costs incurred subsequent to stand establishment, cruising (physical inventory), property maintenance, salaries, supplies, travel, record-keeping, fire protection and other normal recurring administrative personnel costs. Timberland acquisitions are capitalized based on the relative appraised values of timberland, merchantable sawlogs, merchantable pulpwood, pre-production timber (young growth that is not yet merchantable timber), logging roads and other land improvements. The estimated volume of current standing merchantable timber inventory, which is a component of calculating our depletion rates, is updated at least annually to reflect increases due to the reclassification of pre-production timber to merchantable timber when it meets defined diameter specifications, the annual growth of merchantable timber and the acquisition of additional merchantable timber, decreases due to timber harvests and land sales and changes resulting from other factors, such as environmental or casualty losses. Timber volumes are estimated from cruises of the timber tracts, which are completed on our timberlands on approximately a five to ten year cycle. Depletion represents the amount charged to expense as timber is harvested. Rates at which timber is depleted are calculated annually for each of our depletion pools by dividing the beginning of year balance of the merchantable timber accounts by the forest inventory volume, after inventory updates. The base cost of logging roads, such as clearing, grading and ditching, is not amortized and remains a capitalized item until disposition. Other portions of the initial logging road cost, such as bridges, culverts and gravel surfacing are amortized over their useful lives, which range from 5 to 20 years. Costs associated with temporary logging road spurs, which are typically used for one harvest season, are expensed as incurred. REAL ESTATE SALES Sales of non-core timberland are considered to be part of our normal operations. We therefore classify revenue and costs associated with real estate sold in revenues and cost of goods sold, respectively, in our Consolidated Statements of Income. Cash generated from real estate sales is included as an operating activity in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. Sales of large parcels of property, such as our sale of central Idaho timberlands in 2016, which do not represent our core operations and are of such a size as to not be indicative of our ongoing operations, are presented as a net gain or loss in our Consolidated Statements of Income. Cash generated from these sales is included as an investing activity in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. LONG-LIVED ASSETS Our long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable, as measured by its undiscounted estimated future cash flows. We use our operational budgets to estimate future cash flows. The estimates are adjusted periodically to reflect changing business conditions. Impaired assets are written down to fair value. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. We recognize a liability and an asset equal to the fair value of our legal obligations to perform asset retirement activities if the amount can be reasonably estimated. We review these obligations annually and do not expect them to have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. 49 INCOME TAXES We use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, operating loss carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured pursuant to tax laws using rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which the temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. We recognize the effect of a change in income tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities in the Consolidated Statements of Income and Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income in the period that includes the enactment date of the rate change. We record a valuation allowance to reduce the carrying amounts of deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that such deferred tax assets will not be realized. REVENUE RECOGNITION We recognize revenue from the sale of timber when risk of loss transfers to the buyer and the quantity sold is determinable. These sales usually take the form of delivered logs, pay-as-cut stumpage contracts, lump sum stumpage contracts or timber deeds. On delivered log sales, revenue includes amounts billed for logging and hauling and is recognized at the point the logs are delivered and scaled. Revenue is recognized on timber deeds and lump sum stumpage contracts generally upon closing or when the contracts are effective, which is the point at which the buyer assumes risk of loss associated with the standing timber. We recognize revenue from the sale of manufactured wood products and residual by-products when there is persuasive evidence of a sales agreement, the price to the customer is fixed and determinable, collection is reasonably assured and title and the risk of loss passes to the customer. Shipping terms generally indicate when title and the risk of loss have passed. Revenue is recognized at shipment when shipping terms are FOB (free on board) shipping point. For sales where shipping terms are FOB destination, revenue is recognized when the goods are received by the customer. We receive cash consideration in full and recognize revenue at closing on substantially all of our real estate sales. While sales taxes are not typical, in the event sales taxes are collected, revenue is recognized net of any sales tax and sales taxes are recorded as a current liability and remitted to the appropriate governmental entities. Costs for shipping and handling are included in cost of goods sold in our Consolidated Statements of Income. EQUITY-BASED COMPENSATION Equity-based awards are measured at fair value on the dates they are granted or modified. These measurements establish the cost of the equity-based awards for accounting purposes. The cost of the equity-based award is then recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income over each employee’s required service period. See Note 14: Equity-Based Compensation Plans for more information about our equity-based compensation. NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS In March 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which changes several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment award transactions, including accounting for income taxes, diluted shares outstanding, classification of excess tax benefits on the statement of cash flows, forfeitures and minimum statutory tax withholding requirements. We prospectively adopted the provisions of this ASU on January 1, 2017, which include recording the tax effects related to share-based payments through the income statement. As a Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT), we are generally not subject to federal and state corporate income taxes, except through our taxable REIT subsidiaries. Therefore, the adoption of this guidance was not material to our consolidated financial statements. We will continue to estimate forfeitures each period. We consider many factors when estimating expected forfeitures, including types of awards, employee class and historical experience. In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Topic 606 (ASU No. 2014-09), which requires an entity to recognize revenue when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration that is expected to be received for those goods or 50 services. ASU 2014-09 also included other guidance, including the presentation of a gain or loss recognized on the sale of a long-lived asset or a nonfinancial asset. Subsequent ASUs have been issued that provide clarity, technical corrections and improvements to ASU No. 2014-09. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015- 14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), Deferral of the Effective Date, which deferred the effective date of ASU No. 2014-09 by one year. ASU No. 2014-09 is effective for us on January 1, 2018. For most of our sales, which consist of logs, manufactured wood products, residual by-products and real estate, we have identified no change to the timing or amount of revenue recognized because our contracts are legally enforceable, the transaction price is fixed and performance obligations are satisfied at a point in time, typically with control transferring to the buyer when risk of loss and title pass. For our other sales, which include stumpage contracts, timber deeds, land use permits and royalties, we have also identified no change to the timing or amount of revenue recognized. We will have minor refinements to our controls over financial reporting as a result of this ASU. Our expanded disclosures will disaggregate revenues along the lines of the sales categories mentioned above. The guidance permits a retrospective application of the new standard with certain practical expedients (contracts completed within the same annual reporting period need not be restated and other allowances for contracts with variable consideration) or retrospective application with a cumulative effect adjustment to the beginning balance of retained earnings. Upon adoption of this ASU on January 1, 2018, if there is a difference in the amount of revenue recorded for any of the prior reporting periods presented, we will record a cumulative adjustment to retained earnings in the first quarter of 2018. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a significant effect on our consolidated financial statements. In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-07, Compensation – Retirement Benefits (Topic 715), Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost, which requires an entity to present service cost within compensation expense and the other components of net benefit cost outside of income from operations. This ASU is effective for us on January 1, 2018. The amendments in this update require retrospective presentation in the income statement. Changes to the capitalized portion of both service cost and the other components of net benefit cost within inventory will be applied prospectively. In 2017, net periodic pension and other postretirement employee benefit cost reported within operating income totaled $13.2 million of which $6.8 million represented service cost. In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory, which reduces the complexity in the accounting standards by allowing the recognition of current and deferred income taxes for an intra-entity asset transfer, other than inventory, when the transfer occurs. Historically, the income tax consequence of an intra-entity asset transfer was not recognized until the asset was sold to an outside party. This amendment should be applied on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment directly to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. There are no new disclosure requirements. This ASU is effective for us on January 1, 2018. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a significant effect on our consolidated financial statements. In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-1, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business. The standard provides guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or a business. This ASU is effective for us on January 1, 2018 on a prospective basis. In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815), Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities, which simplifies and expands the application of hedge accounting. ASU 2017-12 requires that when a hedge is deemed effective, hedge accounting must be applied to the entire change in fair value of the hedging instrument eliminating the notion of ineffective portions of the hedge relationship. The entire change in the fair value of the hedging instrument will be recorded in the same income statement line item as the hedged item and the ineffective portion will no longer be separately recognized in earnings. This ASU is effective for us on January 1, 2019, with early application permitted in any interim period. The presentation and disclosure guidance are required prospectively upon adoption. Our cash flow hedges currently have no ineffectiveness, but in the event they did, as of the beginning of the fiscal year that we adopt this ASU, a cumulative-effect adjustment related to eliminating the separate measurement of ineffectiveness would be recorded to accumulated other comprehensive income with a corresponding adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings. In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases, which, among other things, requires lessees to recognize most leases on the balance sheet. We have operating leases covering office space, equipment and 51 vehicles expiring at various dates through 2033, which would require a right-of-use asset and a lease liability, initially measured at the present value of the lease payments, to be recognized in the statement of financial position. Lease costs would generally continue to be recognized on a straight-line basis. We expect our right-of- use asset and lease liability will approximate our current future minimum lease payments required under our operating leases, which were $14.4 million at December 31, 2017. The ASU is effective for us on January 1, 2019. In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-2, Income Statement – Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220), Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, which allows a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the December 22, 2017, H.R. 1, Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the Act). See Note 15: Income Taxes for additional information regarding the Act. This ASU is effective for us on January 1, 2019, with early adoption permitted. We expect to adopt this ASU on January 1, 2018 and elect to reclassify the income tax effects of the Act on pension and other postretirement employee benefits and a cash flow hedge within accumulated other comprehensive loss to accumulated deficit. Accordingly, at March 31, 2018, accumulated other comprehensive loss will increase by approximately $20 million and the change will be recorded as a decrease to accumulated deficit. RECLASSIFICATIONS Prior year environmental charges for Avery Landing within the Consolidated Statements of Income have been reclassified to conform to the 2017 presentation. There was no change to revenues, cost of goods sold, operating income or net income. Prior year receivables not due from customers within the Consolidated Balance Sheets have been reclassified to other current assets to conform to the 2017 presentation. There was no change to previously reported total current assets. See Note 7: Other Current Assets for additional information. Certain 2016 and 2015 amounts within cash flows from operations on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows have been reclassified to conform to the 2017 presentation. There was no change to previously reported net cash from operating, investing or financing activities. NOTE 2. PENDING MERGER WITH DELTIC On October 22, 2017, Potlatch, Portland Merger, LLC (Merger Sub), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Potlatch, and Deltic Timber Corporation (Deltic) entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (Merger Agreement) pursuant to which Deltic will merge with and into Merger Sub. Following the merger, Potlatch will be renamed PotlatchDeltic Corporation. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, Deltic shareholders will receive 1.80 shares of Potlatch common stock for each share of Deltic common stock at the closing date. Deltic owns approximately 530,000 acres of timberland, operates two sawmills and a medium density fiberboard plant and is engaged in real estate development primarily in Arkansas. Because the exchange ratio was fixed at the time of the Merger Agreement and the market value of our common stock will continue to fluctuate, the total value of the consideration exchanged will not be determinable until the closing date. The number of shares to be issued with respect to Deltic stock awards will not be determinable until the closing of the transaction. We estimated that approximately 22 million shares of our common stock will be issued to Deltic shareholders in the merger based on the 1.80 exchange ratio and the number of shares of Deltic common stock issued and outstanding as of January 31, 2018. The Merger Agreement provides that, upon termination of the Merger Agreement by a party under certain circumstances, such party may be obligated to pay the other party a termination fee equal to $66 million with respect to the fee payable by Potlatch and $33 million with respect to the fee payable by Deltic. Subsequent to the completion of the transaction, as part of the REIT conversion process, Deltic’s earnings and profits are expected to be distributed to shareholders of the combined company through a dividend or special distribution consisting of 80% stock and 20% cash. 52 The closing of the merger is subject to approval by the shareholders of Deltic and Potlatch and other conditions specified in the Merger Agreement. The respective shareholder meetings are scheduled for February 20, 2018, as published in the joint proxy statement/prospectus dated January 18, 2018. If approved by the shareholders, the merger is expected to close the same day. NOTE 3. EARNINGS PER SHARE The following table reconciles the number of shares used in calculating the basic and diluted earnings per share for the years ended December 31: (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) Net income 2017 2016 2015 $ 86,453 $ 10,938 $ 31,714 Basic weighted-average shares outstanding Incremental shares due to: Performance shares Restricted stock units Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding 40,824,420 40,797,806 40,842,126 362,509 40,459 122,334 23,359 41,227,388 41,033,440 40,987,819 200,164 35,470 Basic net income per share Diluted net income per share $ $ 2.12 $ 2.10 $ 0.27 $ 0.27 $ 0.78 0.77 For stock-based awards, the dilutive effect is calculated using the treasury stock method. Under this method, the dilutive effect is computed as if the awards were exercised at the beginning of the period (or at time of issuance, if later) and assumes the related proceeds were used to repurchase common stock at the average market price during the period. Related proceeds include future compensation cost associated with the stock award. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, there were 250 and 503 stock-based awards, respectively, which were excluded from the calculation of earnings per share because they were anti-dilutive. At December 31, 2015, there were no anti-dilutive stock-based awards. On April 26, 2016, we announced that our board of directors had authorized management to repurchase up to $60 million of common stock over a period of 24 months (the “Repurchase Plan”). We repurchased 169,625 shares of common stock during the second quarter of 2016 at an average price of $35.08 per share. We retire shares upon repurchase. Any excess repurchase price over par is recorded in accumulated deficit. No shares were repurchased during 2017 and $54 million remains available on the authorization. NOTE 4. INVENTORIES (Dollars in thousands) Logs Lumber, plywood and veneer Materials and supplies Valued at lower of cost or net realizable value: Last-in, first-out basis Average cost basis Total inventories 2017 2016 $ $ $ $ 20,133 $ 20,889 9,110 50,132 $ 25,127 $ 25,005 50,132 $ 23,342 20,500 8,780 52,622 29,769 22,853 52,622 If the last-in, first-out inventory had been carried at average cost, the values would have been higher by approximately $10.9 million, $11.1 million and $10.6 million at December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. 53 NOTE 5. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT (Dollars in thousands) Land Buildings and improvements Machinery and equipment Construction in progress Less: accumulated depreciation Total property, plant and equipment, net Range of useful lives 2017 2016 10-40 years 2-25 years $ 4,707 $ 55,734 197,648 1,348 259,437 (182,208) $ 77,229 $ 4,712 54,448 190,316 1,437 250,913 (178,093) 72,820 Depreciation charged against operating income totaled $8.1 million, $8.3 million and $8.2 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Interest expense capitalized was inconsequential in 2017 and 2016, and $0.2 million 2015. NOTE 6. TIMBER AND TIMBERLANDS (Dollars in thousands) Timber and timberlands Logging roads Total timber and timberlands, net 2017 2016 $ $ 581,648 $ 72,828 654,476 $ 572,273 69,583 641,856 Depletion from company-owned lands totaled $17.0 million, $20.8 million and $25.3 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Amortization of road costs, such as bridges, culverts and gravel surfacing, totaled $3.2 million, $3.1 million and $3.1 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Future payments due under timber cutting contracts as of December 31, 2017 are as follows: (Dollars in thousands) 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total NOTE 7. OTHER CURRENT ASSETS (Dollars in thousands) Real estate held for sale Prepaid expenses Other receivables Interest rate swaps Total other current assets $ $ 11,280 2,730 1,085 5,370 281 20,746 2017 2016 $ $ 7,721 $ 2,862 882 13 11,478 $ 9,184 1,939 2,442 32 13,597 NOTE 8. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES (Dollars in thousands) Accrued payroll and benefits Accounts payable Accrued interest Avery Landing accrual Accrued taxes Other current liabilities Total accounts payable and accrued liabilities 2017 2016 $ $ 18,110 $ 9,361 6,385 6,000 5,103 10,242 55,201 $ 13,634 8,382 6,237 1,022 4,956 9,479 43,710 54 NOTE 9. DEBT (Dollars in thousands) Term loans Senior notes Revenue bonds Medium-term notes Long-term principal Interest rate swaps Debt issuance costs Unamortized discounts Total long-term debt (includes current portion) Less current portion of long-term debt Long-term debt TERM LOANS 2017 2016 $ $ 343,500 $ 150,000 65,735 17,250 576,485 (373) (2,321) (472) 573,319 (14,263) 559,056 $ 349,500 150,000 65,735 22,250 587,485 247 (3,015) (729) 583,988 (11,032) 572,956 We repaid $6 million of our term loans in 2017. The remaining term loans include eight tranches consisting of the following: • • • • • one $6 million tranche with a rate of 3.70% maturing in 2020; three $40 million tranches maturing each year from 2019 through 2021 at variable rates based on three- month LIBOR plus a spread between 1.65% and 1.90% (term loan variable rates are based on three- month LIBOR of 1.34%, which is the rate incurred during the fourth quarter of 2017); two $40 million tranches with rates of 4.29% maturing in 2022 and 4.49% maturing in 2023; one tranche of $110 million with a rate of 4.64% maturing in 2024; and one tranche of $27.5 million with a rate of 2.15% plus three-month LIBOR maturing in 2026. SENIOR NOTES In 2009, we sold $150 million aggregate principal amount of 7.50% senior notes due in 2019. The terms of these notes limit our ability, and the ability of any subsidiary guarantors, to borrow money, pay dividends, redeem or repurchase capital stock, enter into sale and leaseback transactions and create liens. MEDIUM-TERM NOTES AND REVENUE BONDS The medium-term notes were originally issued during 1991 and 1992 with fixed rates of 8.75% to 8.89% due 2018 through 2022. Repayment of $5 million of our medium-term notes occurred in 2017. In 2016, we repaid $42.6 million of revenue bonds. The bonds carried a rate of 5.90% and matured in 2026. In 2016, we also refinanced $65.7 million of revenue bonds at a rate of 2.75%. The original bonds, which carried a rate of 6.00%, were extinguished and a new debt obligation was simultaneously issued. The principal balance and maturity date in 2024 remain unchanged. DEBT ISSUANCE COSTS Debt issuance costs represent the capitalized direct costs incurred related to the issuance of debt. These costs are amortized to interest expense over the terms of the respective borrowings. 55 DEBT MATURITIES Scheduled principal payments due on long-term debt as of December 31, 2017 are as follows: (Dollars in thousands) 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Thereafter Total $ $ 14,250 190,000 46,000 40,000 43,000 243,235 576,485 Principal repayments on long-term debt occur at maturity. Our debt obligations are of equal priority. CREDIT AGREEMENT In 2014, we entered into an amended and restated credit agreement with an expiration date of February 12, 2020. The credit agreement provides for a revolving line of credit with an initial aggregate principal amount not to exceed $250 million, which may be increased by up to an additional $250 million. It also includes a sublimit of $40 million for the issuance of standby letters of credit and a sublimit of $25 million for swing line loans. Usage under either or both subfacilities reduces availability under the revolving line of credit. As of December 31, 2017, there were no borrowings outstanding under the revolving line of credit, and approximately $0.9 million of the letter of credit subfacility was being used to support several outstanding letters of credit. Available borrowing capacity at December 31, 2017 was $249.1 million. Pricing is set according to the type of borrowing. LIBOR Loans are issued at a rate equal to the British Bankers Association LIBOR Rate, while Base Rate Loans are issued at a rate equal to the Base Rate, which is a fluctuating rate per annum equal to the highest of (a) the Federal Funds Rate plus 1/2 of 1.00%, (b) the rate of interest in effect for such day as publicly announced from time to time by KeyBank as its “prime rate” and (c) the sum of the LIBOR that would apply to a one month Interest Period plus 1.00%. The interest rates we pay for borrowings under either type of loan include an additional Applicable Rate, which can range from 0.875% to 1.70% for LIBOR loans and from 0% to 0.70% for Base Rate loans, depending on our current credit rating. As of December 31, 2017, we were able to borrow under the bank credit facility with the additional applicable rate of 1.50% for LIBOR Loans and 0.50% for Base Rate Loans, with facility fees of 0.25% on the $250 million of the bank credit facility. On February 14, 2018, we entered into a second amended and restated credit agreement (the Amended Credit Agreement) with an expiration date of April 14, 2023. The Amended Credit Agreement increases our revolving line of credit to $380 million, which may be increased by up to an additional $420 million. It also includes a sublimit of $75 million for the issuance of standby letters of credit and a sublimit of $25 million for swing line loans. Usage under either or both subfacilities reduces availability under the revolving line of credit. Pricing is consistent with the 2014 amended and restated credit agreement. The interest coverage ratio and leverage ratio financial covenants are unchanged. The limitation on timberland acre sales was eliminated. 56 NOTE 10. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS From time to time, we enter into derivative financial instruments to manage certain cash flow and fair value risks. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset or liability to a particular risk, such as interest rate risk, are considered fair value hedges. We have three fair value interest rate swaps with notional amounts totaling $14.3 million associated with our medium-term notes. The fair value swaps convert interest payments with fixed rates ranging between 8.88% and 8.89% to a variable rate of 3- month LIBOR plus a spread of 6.17%. Our fair value swaps terminate at various dates in the first quarter of 2018. A $50 million notional fair value swap associated with our senior notes was terminated in December 2017 at a cost of $0.4 million. The termination cost has been recorded as a reduction to the carrying value of our long-term debt and will be amortized to earnings through the original maturity date of November 2019. Approximately $0.2 million will be recorded as interest expense over the next twelve months. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to variability in the cash flows of a specific asset or liability that is attributable to a particular risk, such as interest rate risk, are considered cash flow hedges. We have one interest rate swap with a notional amount of $27.5 million associated with $27.5 million of term loan debt. The cash flow hedge converts a variable rate of 2.15% plus 3-month LIBOR to a fixed rate of 3.88% and terminates in February 2026. Our cash flow hedge is expected to be highly effective in achieving offsetting cash flows attributable to the hedged interest rate risk through the term of the hedge. Therefore, changes in the fair value of the interest rate swap are recorded as a component of other comprehensive income and will be recognized in earnings when the hedged interest rate affects earnings. Changes in the fair value of the ineffective portion are recognized immediately in earnings. There has been no impact on earnings due to ineffectiveness to date. As of December 31, 2017, the amount of net losses expected to be reclassified into earnings in the next 12 months is inconsequential. Derivatives not designated as hedges are not speculative and are used to manage our exposure to interest rate movements, commodity price movements or other identified risks, but do not meet the strict hedge accounting requirements. Changes in the fair value of derivatives not designated in hedging relationships are recorded directly into income. In April 2017, we entered into a lumber price swap to fix the price on a total of 36 million board feet (MMBF) of southern yellow pine. The lumber price swap expired on December 31, 2017, resulting in a realized gain of $1.1 million for the period then ended. The fair values of our cash flow and fair value derivative instruments on our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31 are as follows: (Dollars in thousands) Derivatives designated in fair value hedging relationships: Location Interest rate contracts Interest rate contracts Other assets, current Other assets, non-current $ $ Asset Derivatives 2017 2016 Location Liability Derivatives 2016 2017 13 $ 32 13 $ 215 247 Other long-term obligations $ $ — $ — $ — 91 91 Derivatives designated in cash flow hedging relationships: Interest rate contracts Other assets, non-current $ 1,156 $ 1,148 $ — $ — 57 The following table details the effect of derivatives on our Consolidated Statements of Income: (Dollars in thousands) Derivatives designated in fair value hedging relationships: Interest rate contracts Location 2017 2016 2015 Realized gain on interest rate contracts1 Interest expense $ 413 $ 805 $ 1,534 Derivatives designated in cash flow hedging relationships: Interest rate contracts Gain (loss) recognized in other comprehensive income, net of tax (effective portion) Loss reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (effective portion)1 Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: Lumber price contracts Realized gain on lumber price swap $ (145) $ 916 $ Interest expense $ (149) $ (215) $ — — Gain on lumber price swap $ 1,088 $ — $ — 1 Realized gains and losses on interest rate contracts consist of net cash received or paid and interest accruals on the interest rate swaps during the periods. Net cash received or paid is included in the supplemental cash flow information within interest, net of amounts capitalized in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. NOTE 11. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS Estimated fair values of our financial instruments as of December 31 are as follows: (Dollars in thousands) Cash and cash equivalents (Level 1) Derivative assets related to interest rate swaps (Level 2) Derivative liabilities related to interest rate swaps (Level 2) Long-term debt, including current portion (Level 2): Term loans Senior notes Revenue bonds Medium-term notes Total long-term debt1 2017 2016 Carrying Amount Fair Value Carrying Amount Fair Value $ 120,457 $ 120,457 $ 82,584 $ 82,584 $ $ 1,169 $ 1,169 $ 1,395 $ 1,395 — $ — $ (91) $ (91) $ (343,500) $ (345,222) $ (349,500) $ (350,909) (164,250) (62,205) (23,926) $ (576,013) $ (588,479) $ (586,756) $ (601,290) (149,528) (65,735) (17,250) (149,271) (65,735) (22,250) (161,063) (63,967) (18,227) Company owned life insurance (COLI) (Level 3) $ 1,996 $ 1,996 $ 70 $ 70 1 The carrying amount of long-term debt includes principal and unamortized discounts. A framework has been established for measuring fair value, which provides a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below. Level 1 inputs to the valuation methodology are unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. Level 2 inputs to the valuation methodology include: • • quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets; 58 • • inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability; and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means. Level 3 inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement. If the asset or liability has a specified (contractual) term, the Level 2 input must correspond to substantially the full term of the asset or liability. The fair value measurement level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Valuation techniques used need to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. • For cash and cash-equivalents, the carrying amount approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of these financial instruments. • The fair value of the interest rate swaps was determined using discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. The analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate forward curves. • The fair value of our long-term debt is estimated based upon the quoted market prices for the same or similar debt issues, or estimated based on average market prices for comparable debt when there is no quoted market price. • The contract value of our COLI, the amount at which it could be redeemed, is used to estimate fair value because market prices are not readily available. COMPANY OWNED LIFE INSURANCE We are the beneficiary of insurance policies on the lives of certain current and past officers and employees. We have recognized the amount that could be realized upon surrender of the insurance policies in other assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. COLI expense and income are included in selling, general and administrative expenses and interest expense, respectively, in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The net effect of these amounts on income was not significant for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015. Cash receipts and disbursements are recorded as investing activities in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. NOTE 12. SAVINGS PLANS, PENSION PLANS AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT EMPLOYEE BENEFITS SAVINGS PLANS Substantially all of our employees are eligible to participate in 401(k) savings plans. In 2017, 2016 and 2015, we made matching 401(k) contributions on behalf of our employees of $2.4 million, $2.1 million and $2.1 million, respectively. Certain eligible employees who earn awards under our annual incentive plan are permitted to defer receipt of those awards. These employees may defer receipt of a minimum of 50% and a maximum of 100% of the award pursuant to rules established under our Management Deferred Compensation Plan. Eligible employees may also defer up to 50% of their base salary under the Management Deferred Compensation Plan. At the employee's election, deferrals may be deemed invested in a company stock unit account, a directed investment account with certain deemed investments available under the 401(k) Plan or a combination of these investment vehicles. If company stock units are elected, dividend equivalents are credited to the units. PENSION PLANS AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS On January 1, 2011, we froze our pension plans to any new salaried and hourly non-represented employees hired after that date. 59 Effective January 1, 2010, we restructured our other postretirement benefit plans (OPEB). The level of health care subsidy was frozen for retirees so that all future increments in health care costs will be borne by the retirees. In addition, for retirees under age 65, a high deductible medical plan was created and all other existing health care plans were terminated. For retirees age 65 or over, the medical plan is divided into two components, with the company continuing to self-insure prescription drugs and providing a fully-insured medical supplemental plan through AARP/United Healthcare. Both health care plans require the retiree to contribute amounts in excess of the company subsidy in order to continue coverage. Finally, vision, dental and life insurance coverage for these retirees were terminated. The effect of these retiree plan changes was a reduction in the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation of $76.7 million, which was recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss as of December 31, 2009 and will be amortized through 2019. We use a December 31 measurement date for our benefit plans and obligations. We recognize the underfunded status of our defined benefit pension plans and OPEB obligations on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. We recognize changes in the funded status in the year in which changes occur through accumulated other comprehensive income and amortize actuarial gains and losses through the Consolidated Statements of Income as net periodic cost (benefit). The change in benefit obligation, change in plan assets and funded status for company-sponsored benefit plans and obligations are as follows: (Dollars in thousands) Benefit obligation at beginning of year Service cost Interest cost Actuarial (loss) gain Benefits paid Benefit obligation at end of year Pension Plans 2017 2016 $ (385,461) $ (382,071) $ (6,508) (17,020) (13,997) 34,135 $ (392,371) $ (385,461) $ (6,753) (16,096) (15,876) 31,815 OPEB 2017 (33,337) $ (14) (1,262) 471 3,793 (30,349) $ Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year Actual return on plan assets Employer contributions and benefit payments Benefits paid Fair value of plan assets at end of year $ 289,675 $ 292,200 $ 28,626 2,984 (34,135) $ 313,862 $ 289,675 $ 49,158 6,844 (31,815) — $ — 3,794 (3,794) — $ 2016 (35,471) (14) (1,421) (313) 3,882 (33,337) — — 3,882 (3,882) — Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets: Current liabilities $ Noncurrent liabilities Funded status $ (1,629) $ (76,880) (78,509) $ (1,824) $ (93,962) (95,786) $ (3,705) $ (26,644) (30,349) $ (4,015) (29,322) (33,337) The accumulated benefit obligation for all defined benefit pension plans is determined using the actuarial present value of the vested benefits to which the employee is currently entitled and the employee’s expected date of separation for retirement and was $389.6 million and $379.5 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. PENSION ASSETS We utilize formal investment policy guidelines for our company-sponsored pension plan assets. Management’s responsibility is that the investment policy and guidelines are adhered to and the investment objectives are met. The general policy states that plan assets will be invested to seek the greatest return consistent with the fiduciary character of the pension funds and to allow the plans to meet the need for timely pension benefit payments. The specific investment guidelines stipulate that management will maintain adequate liquidity for meeting expected benefit payments by reviewing, on a timely basis, contribution and benefit payment levels and appropriately revise long-term and short-term asset allocations. Management takes reasonable and prudent steps to preserve the value of pension fund assets and to avoid the risk of large losses. Major steps taken to provide this protection include the following: 60 • Assets are diversified among various asset classes, such as domestic equities, global equities, fixed income, convertible securities and liquid reserves. The long-term asset allocation ranges are as follows: Domestic and international equities Fixed income securities Alternatives, which may include equities and fixed income securities Cash and cash equivalents 24% - 48% 38% - 58% 12% - 18% 0% - 5% • Periodic reviews of allocations within these ranges are made to determine what adjustments should be made based on changing economic and market conditions and specific liquidity requirements. • Assets are managed by professional investment managers and may be invested in separately managed accounts or commingled funds. Assets are diversified by selecting different investment managers for each asset class and by limiting assets under each manager to no more than 25% of the total pension fund. • Assets are not invested in Potlatch stock. The investment guidelines also provide that the individual investment managers are expected to achieve a reasonable rate of return over a market cycle. Emphasis will be placed on long-term performance versus short- term market aberrations. Factors to be considered in determining reasonable rates of return include performance achieved by a diverse cross section of other investment managers, performance of commonly used benchmarks (e.g., Russell 2500 Index, Barclays Long Credit Index, Morgan Stanley Capital International Index), actuarial assumptions for return on plan investments and specific performance guidelines given to individual investment managers. The asset allocations of the pension benefit plans’ assets at December 31 by asset category are as follows: Asset Category Domestic and international equities Fixed income securities Other (includes cash and cash equivalents and alternatives) Total Pension Plans 2017 2016 37% 47 16 100% 36% 48 16 100% The pension assets are stated at fair value. Refer to Note 11: Financial Instruments for a discussion of the framework used to measure fair value. Following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for assets measured at fair value: • • • Level 1 assets include cash and cash equivalents, corporate common and preferred stocks with quoted market prices on major securities markets, and investments in registered investment company funds for which market quotations are generally readily available on the primary market or exchange on which they are traded. Level 2 assets consist primarily of collective investment trust funds, which are valued at their respective net asset value (NAV) and fully redeemable in the near-term. Investments in funds that may not be fully redeemed in the near-term are generally classified in Level 3. We had no Level 3 investments at December 31, 2017 or 2016. 61 Fair value measurements are as follows: (Dollars in thousands) Asset Category Cash and cash equivalents Domestic equity securities1 International equity securities2 Emerging markets3 Fixed income securities4 Alternatives5 Total (Dollars in thousands) Asset Category Cash and cash equivalents Domestic equity securities1 International equity securities2 Emerging markets3 Fixed income securities4 Alternatives5 Total Level 1 December 31, 2017 Level 2 3,004 $ 29,178 — 12 148,833 — 181,027 $ — $ 28,382 28,413 29,245 — 46,795 132,835 $ Level 1 December 31, 2016 Level 2 2,845 $ 25,409 — 12 138,897 — 167,163 $ — $ 26,279 26,555 26,391 — 43,287 122,512 $ $ $ $ $ Total 3,004 57,560 28,413 29,257 148,833 46,795 313,862 Total 2,845 51,688 26,555 26,403 138,897 43,287 289,675 1 2 3 4 5 Level 1 assets are managed investments in U.S. small/mid-cap equities that track the Russell 2500 Growth index or Russell 2500 Value index. Level 2 assets are collective investments, which are invested in U.S. large-cap equities that track the S&P 500. Level 2 assets are collective investments in equity funds of developed markets outside of the United States and Canada that track the MSCI EAFE Value index or MSCI EAFE Growth index. Level 1 assets are mutual funds which are invested in the common stock of companies located (or with primary operations) in emerging markets that track the MSCI Emerging Markets index. Level 2 assets are collective investments in the common stock of companies located (or with primary operations) in emerging markets that track the MSCI Emerging Markets index. Level 1 assets are mutual funds and investments in a diversified portfolio of fixed income instruments of varying maturities representing corporates, sovereign debt, U.S. treasuries and municipals that track the Barclay's Long-term Credit index. Level 2 assets are collective investments in inflation-indexed bonds, securities of real estate companies, commodity index-linked notes, fixed income securities, foreign currencies, securities of natural resource companies, master limited partnerships, publicly listed infrastructure companies, floating-rate debt, securities of global agriculture companies and securities of global timber companies. PLAN ACTIVITY Pre-tax components of net periodic cost (benefit) recognized in our Consolidated Statements of Income were as follows: (Dollars in thousands) Service cost Interest cost Expected return on plan assets Amortization of prior service cost (credit) Amortization of actuarial loss Net periodic cost (benefit) OPEB Pension Plans 2017 2016 2015 22 $ 6,753 $ 6,508 $ 6,159 $ 1,456 16,096 17,020 17,012 — (18,406) (18,999) (20,804) (9,312) 605 2,047 14,484 16,339 17,937 $ 19,215 $ 21,386 $ 20,909 $ (6,064) $ (5,725) $ (5,787) 518 288 2017 14 $ 1,262 — (8,877) 1,537 2016 14 $ 1,421 — (8,877) 1,717 2015 62 Other amounts recognized in our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income were as follows: (Dollars in thousands) Net amount at beginning of year Amounts arising during the period: Pension Plans 2016 2017 2015 $120,627 $128,244 $134,261 $ (9,182) $(13,741) $(15,869) 2017 2016 2015 OPEB Net (gain) loss Taxes Net amount arising during the period (14,874) 3,869 (11,005) 4,370 (1,704) 2,666 8,680 (3,386) 5,294 (471) 121 (350) 313 (122) 191 (3,777) 1,473 (2,304) Amounts reclassified during the period: Amortization of prior service (cost) credit Amortization of actuarial loss Taxes Net reclassifications during the period Net amount at end of year (288) (518) (605) (14,484) (16,339) (17,937) 5,761 7,231 6,574 (9,011) (10,283) (11,311) 9,312 (2,047) (2,833) 4,432 $100,611 $120,627 $128,244 $ (5,055) $ (9,182) $(13,741) 8,877 (1,537) (2,863) 4,477 8,877 (1,717) (2,792) 4,368 Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, net of tax, consist of: (Dollars in thousands) Net loss Prior service cost (credit) Net amount recognized Pension Plans 2017 2016 $ 100,070 $ 120,006 $ 621 $ 100,611 $ 120,627 $ 541 OPEB 2017 10,165 $ (15,220) (5,055) $ 2016 8,778 (17,960) (9,182) The estimated net loss and prior service cost for the defined benefit pension plans that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive loss into net periodic benefit cost over the next year are $16.6 million and $0.2 million, respectively. The estimated net loss and prior service credit for OPEB obligations that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive loss into net periodic benefit over the next year are $1.4 million and $8.9 million, respectively. EXPECTED FUNDING AND BENEFIT PAYMENTS We are required to make contributions of $10.1 million to our qualified pension plans in 2018. Our non-qualified pension plan and other postretirement employee benefit plans are unfunded and benefit payments are paid from our general assets. We estimate that we will make non-qualified pension plan and other postretirement employee benefit payments of $5.3 million in 2018, which are included below. Estimated future benefit payments, which reflect expected future service are as follows for the years indicated: (Dollars in thousands) 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2022–2026 ACTUARIAL ASSUMPTIONS Pension Plans OPEB $ $ $ $ $ $ 28,536 $ 28,264 $ 27,951 $ 27,588 $ 27,255 $ 128,115 $ 3,704 3,454 3,231 2,944 2,760 10,557 The weighted average assumptions used to determine the benefit obligation as of December 31 were: Discount rate Rate of salaried compensation increase Pension Plans OPEB 2017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015 3.85% 3.00% 4.40% 3.00% 4.65% 3.00% 3.65% — 4.10% — 4.25% — 63 The weighted average assumptions used to determine the net periodic cost (benefit) for the years ended December 31 were: Discount rate Expected return on plan assets Rate of salaried compensation increase Pension Plans OPEB 2017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015 4.40% 6.50% 3.00% 4.65% 6.50% 3.00% 4.25% 6.75% 3.00% 4.10% — — 4.25% — — 3.90% — — The discount rate used in the determination of pension and other postretirement employee benefit obligations was calculated using hypothetical bond portfolios to match the expected benefit payments under each of our pension plans and other postretirement employee benefit obligations based on bonds available at each year-end with a rating of "AA" or better. The portfolios were well-diversified over corporate industrial, corporate financial, municipal, federal and foreign government issuers. The expected return on plan assets assumption is based upon an analysis of historical long-term returns for various investment categories, as measured by appropriate indices. These indices are weighted based upon the extent to which plan assets are invested in the particular categories in arriving at our determination of a composite expected return. The expected rate of return assumption that will be used to determine net periodic cost for 2018 is 6.25%. A decrease in the discount rate or the rate of expected return on plan assets, all other assumptions remaining the same, would increase net periodic cost. A 25 basis point decrease in the pension discount rate would increase net periodic cost by approximately $0.7 million in 2018 and increase the projected benefit obligation by approximately $10.3 million as of December 31, 2018. A 25 basis point decrease in the assumption for the expected return on plan assets would increase net periodic cost by approximately $0.7 million in 2018. The actual rates of return on plan assets may, and do, vary significantly from the assumption used. A 25 basis point decrease in the OPEB discount rate would be de minimis to the annual net periodic cost. The assumed health care cost trend rate used to calculate other postretirement employee benefit obligations as of December 31, 2017 was 8.38% for a certain group of participants under age 65 in our hourly plan and our Arkansas participants covered by a collective bargaining agreement, grading ratably to an assumption of 4.50% in 2038. The actual rates of health care cost increases may vary significantly from the assumption used because of unanticipated changes in health care costs. A one percentage point change in the health care cost trend rates would have the following effects on our December 31, 2017 Consolidated Financial Statements: (Dollars in thousands) Effect on total service cost plus interest cost Effect on accumulated postretirement benefit obligation 1% Increase 1% Decrease $ $ 28 $ 443 $ (24) (373) NOTE 13. COMPONENTS OF ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS The following tables detail the changes in our accumulated other comprehensive loss (AOCL) on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, net of tax. (Dollars in thousands) Balance at January 1, 2017 Amounts arising during the period Amounts reclassified from AOCL Net change Balance at December 31, 2017 Gains and losses on cash flow hedge Pension Plans OPEB $ $ (701) $ 145 (149) (4) (705) $ 120,627 $ (11,005) (9,011) (20,016) 100,611 $ (9,182) $ (350) 4,477 4,127 (5,055) $ Total 110,744 (11,210) (4,683) (15,893) 94,851 64  (Dollars in thousands) Balance at January 1, 2016 Amounts arising during the period Amounts reclassified from AOCL Net change Balance at December 31, 2016 Amounts in parenthesis indicate credits. Gains and losses on cash flow hedge Pension Plans OPEB $ $ — $ (916) 215 (701) (701) $ 128,244 $ 2,666 (10,283) (7,617) 120,627 $ (13,741) $ 191 4,368 4,559 (9,182) $ Total 114,503 1,941 (5,700) (3,759) 110,744 See Note 10: Derivative Instruments and Note 12: Pension and Other Postretirement Employee Benefits for additional information. NOTE 14. EQUITY-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS As of December 31, 2017, we had two stock incentive plans under which performance stock awards (PSAs), restricted stock units (RSUs) and deferred compensation stock equivalent units were outstanding. All of these plans have received shareholder approval. We were originally authorized to issue up to 1.6 million shares and 1.0 million shares under our 2005 Stock Incentive Plan and 2014 Stock Incentive Plan, respectively. At December 31, 2017, approximately 0.4 million shares were authorized for future awards. We issue new shares of common stock to settle PSAs, RSUs and deferred compensation stock equivalent units. We estimate forfeitures each period. The following table details our compensation expense and the related income tax benefit as of December 31: (Dollars in thousands) Employee equity-based compensation expense: Performance stock awards Restricted stock units Total employee equity-based compensation expense Deferred compensation stock equivalent units expense 2017 2016 2015 $ $ $ 3,582 $ 1,140 4,722 $ 3,437 $ 953 4,390 $ 657 $ 732 $ Total tax benefit recognized for shared-based payment awards $ 379 $ 317 $ PERFORMANCE STOCK AWARDS PSAs granted under the stock incentive plans have a three-year performance period and shares are issued at the end of the period if the performance measures are met. The performance measures are based on the percentile ranking of our total shareholder return relative to the total shareholder return performance of both a selected peer group of companies and a larger group of indexed companies over the three-year performance period. The number of shares actually issued, as a percentage of the amount subject to the PSA, could range from 0% to 200%. PSAs granted under our stock incentive plans do not have voting rights unless and until shares are issued upon settlement. If shares are issued at the end of the three-year performance measurement period, the recipients will receive dividend equivalents in the form of additional shares at the time of payment equal to the dividends that would have been paid on the shares earned had the recipients owned the shares during the three- year period. Therefore, the shares are not considered participating securities. A Monte Carlo simulation method is used to estimate the stock prices of Potlatch and the selected peer companies at the end of the three-year performance period. The expected volatility of each company’s stock price and covariance of returns among the peer companies are key assumptions within the Monte Carlo simulation. Historical volatility over a term similar to the performance period is considered a reasonable proxy for forecasted volatility. Likewise, because the returns of Potlatch and the peer group companies are correlated, the covariance, a measure of how two variables tend to move together, is calculated over a historical term similar to the performance period and applied in the simulations. The simulations use the stock prices of Potlatch and the peer group of companies as of the award date as a starting point. Multiple simulations are generated, resulting in share 65 3,877 881 4,758 376 319 prices and total shareholder return values for Potlatch and the peer group of companies. For each simulation, the total shareholder return of Potlatch is ranked against that of the peer group of companies. The future value of the performance share unit is calculated based on a multiplier for the percentile ranking and then discounted to present value. The discount rate is the risk-free rate as of the award date for a term consistent with the performance period. Awards are also credited with dividend equivalents at the end of the performance period, and as a result, award values are not adjusted for dividends. The following table presents the key inputs used in calculating the fair value of the PSAs in 2017, 2016 and 2015, and the resulting fair values: 2017 2016 2015 Stock price as of valuation date Risk-free rate Expected volatility Expected dividends Expected term (years) Fair value of a performance share $ $ 43.60 $ 1.61% 24.22% 3.44% 3.00 53.85 $ 25.92 $ 0.88% 23.82% 5.79% 3.00 30.02 $ 40.00 1.07% 21.09% 3.75% 3.00 36.71 The following table summarizes outstanding PSAs as of December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, and the changes during those years: 2017 2016 2015 (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) Unvested shares outstanding at January 1 Granted Vested Forfeited Unvested shares outstanding at December 3 1 Total grant date fair value of share awards vested during the year Aggregate intrinsic value of unvested share awards at December 31 Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Shares Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Shares 32.59 161,049 $ 53.85 125,469 $ 36.71 (82,730) $ — $ 34.68 41.26 160,233 $ 30.02 78,974 $ 45.57 (77,078) $ (1,080) $ — Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value 53.86 36.71 62.78 41.29 Shares 203,788 $ 78,033 $ (78,129) $ (3,061) $ 200,631 $ 39.19 203,788 $ 32.59 161,049 $ 41.26 $ 2,868 $ 3,770 $ 4,839 $ 10,011 $ 8,488 $ 4,697 As of December 31, 2017, there was $4.0 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested PSAs, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.4 years. RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS Our 2005 Stock Incentive Plan and 2014 Stock Incentive Plan also allow for awards to be issued in the form of RSU grants. During 2017, 2016 and 2015, certain officers and other employees of the company were granted RSU awards that will accrue dividend equivalents based on dividends paid during the RSU vesting period. The dividend equivalents will be converted into additional RSUs that will vest in the same manner as the underlying RSUs to which they relate. Therefore, the shares are not considered participating securities. The terms of the awards state that the RSUs will vest in a given time period of one to three years, and the terms of certain awards follow a vesting schedule within the given time period. 66 The following table summarizes outstanding RSU awards as of December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, and the changes during those years: 2017 2016 2015 (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) Unvested shares outstanding at January 1 Granted Vested Forfeited Unvested shares outstanding at December 3 1 Total grant date fair value of RSU awards vested during the year Aggregate intrinsic value of unvested RSU awards at December 31 Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Shares Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Shares 31.61 44,531 $ 43.64 43,320 $ 39.65 (16,431) $ — $ 31.63 40.95 32,455 $ 26.08 27,820 $ 39.92 (15,385) $ (359) $ — Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value 42.24 39.99 44.50 40.27 Shares 71,420 $ 26,507 $ (29,039) $ (1,017) $ 67,871 $ 32.87 71,420 $ 31.61 44,531 $ 40.95 $ 1,151 $ 656 $ 289 $ 3,387 $ 2,975 $ 1,347 As of December 31, 2017, there was $1.1 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to outstanding RSU awards, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.4 years. DEFERRED COMPENSATION STOCK EQUIVALENT UNITS A long-term incentive award is granted annually to our directors, and payable upon a director's separation from service. Directors may also elect to defer their annual retainers, payable in the form of stock. All stock unit equivalent accounts are credited with dividend equivalents. As of December 31, 2017, there were 141,938 shares outstanding that will be distributed in the future to directors as common stock. Issuance of restricted stock units awarded to certain officers and employees may also be deferred. All stock unit equivalent accounts are credited with dividend equivalents. As of December 31, 2017, there were 74,067 RSUs which had vested, but issuance of the related stock had been deferred. NOTE 15. INCOME TAXES As a REIT, we generally are not subject to federal and state corporate income taxes on income from investments in real estate that we distribute to our shareholders. We are required to pay federal and state corporate income taxes on income from our non-real estate investments which are held in taxable REIT subsidiaries (TRS). These activities are principally comprised of our wood products manufacturing operations and certain real estate investments held for sale. As of January 1, 2016, we are no longer subject to corporate income taxes on built-in gains, the excess of fair market value over tax basis, on sales of real property held at the time of our REIT conversion. On December 22, 2017, H.R. 1, Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the Act) was enacted and included broad tax reforms. Under the provisions of the Act, the U.S. corporate tax rate decreased from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018, which required a remeasurement of our deferred tax assets and liabilities as of the date of enactment. Accordingly, net deferred tax assets, including the related valuation allowance, were reduced by $10.7 million and the change was recorded as an increase to the 2017 tax provision. Income tax expense consists of the following for the years ended December 31: (Dollars in thousands) Current Deferred Net operating loss carryforwards Income tax provision (benefit) 2017 2016 2015 $ $ 16,657 $ 14,325 1,039 32,021 $ (6,178) $ 2,143 (290) (4,325) $ 128 1,097 (6,793) (5,568) 67 Income tax expense differs from the amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate of 35% to income before income taxes due to the following for the years ended December 31: (Dollars in thousands) U.S. federal statutory income tax REIT income not subject to federal income tax U.S. tax rate change on deferred tax assets and liabilities Intercompany profit-in-inventory elimination adjustment Change in valuation allowance State income taxes, net of federal income tax Domestic production activities deduction Permanent book-tax differences Research and development credits All other items Income tax provision (benefit) Effective tax rate 2017 2016 2015 $ $ $ 41,466 $ (20,651) 10,528 — 140 2,608 (1,511) (252) (294) (13) $ 27.0% 32,021 2,314 (7,199) — 1,465 162 (740) (2) (218) (689) 582 (4,325) $ (65.4%) 9,151 (14,110) — — 488 (838) — (70) — (189) (5,568) (21.3%) The tax effects of significant temporary differences creating deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31 were: (Dollars in thousands) Deferred tax assets: Pensions Other postretirement employee benefits Net operating loss carryforwards Inventories Tax credits Nondeductible accruals Incentive compensation Employee benefits Other Total deferred tax assets Valuation allowance Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance Deferred tax liabilities: Timber and timberlands, net Property, plant and equipment, net Other Total deferred tax liabilities Deferred tax assets, net 2017 2016 $ $ 19,439 $ 7,891 54 353 2,443 2,566 1,131 1,037 88 35,002 (790) 34,212 (1,432) (12,683) (301) (14,416) 19,796 $ 37,423 13,002 983 443 2,207 2,067 1,643 1,444 120 59,332 (650) 58,682 (2,165) (14,018) (448) (16,631) 42,051 As of December 31, 2017, we had no federal net operating loss carryforwards; state net operating loss and capital loss carryforwards were $1.2 million that expire from 2021 through 2030; and Idaho Investment Tax Credits were $3.1 million that expire from 2019 through 2031. We use the flow-through method of accounting for investment tax credits. With the exception of the valuation allowance discussed below, we believe it is more likely than not that we will have sufficient future taxable income to realize our deferred tax assets. 68 Due to the impact of the change in federal rate under the Act, the valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets increased during 2017 by $0.1 million, and was $0.8 million as of December 31, 2017. The valuation allowance is related to certain Idaho Investment Tax Credit carryforwards we expect will expire prior to realization. During 2016, the valuation allowance increased from $0.5 to $0.7 million due to the actual use and expected future use of certain Idaho Investment Tax Credits. The following table summarizes the tax years subject to examination by major taxing jurisdictions: Jurisdiction Federal Arkansas Michigan Minnesota Idaho Years 2013 — 2017 2014 — 2017 2013 — 2017 2013 — 2017 2014 — 2017 As of December 31, 2017, we had $0.6 million of unrecognized tax benefits which, if recognized, would impact the effective tax rate. There was $0.9 unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2016 and no unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2015. We currently believe there is a reasonable possibility that the amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly decrease in the next 12 months based on the closing of certain ongoing state tax examinations. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending unrecognized tax benefits is as follows: (Dollars in thousands) Balance at January 1 Additions for tax positions of prior years Reduction for tax positions of prior years Balance at December 31 2017 2016 $ $ $ 850 8 (294) $ 564 — 850 — 850 We reflect accrued interest related to tax obligations, as well as penalties, in our provision for income taxes. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, we recognized insignificant amounts related to interest and penalties in our tax provision. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, we had insignificant amounts of accrued interest related to tax obligations and no accrued interest receivable with respect to open tax refunds. NOTE 16. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES OPERATING LEASES We have operating leases primarily for office space, machinery and equipment expiring at various dates through 2033. We expect that most leases will be renewed or replaced in the normal course of business as they expire. As of December 31, 2017, the future minimum rental payments required under our operating leases are as follows: (Dollars in thousands) 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 and thereafter Total $ $ 4,570 3,518 2,662 1,771 874 992 14,387 Operating lease expense was $4.5 million, $4.2 million and $4.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. 69 LEGAL MATTERS In January 2007, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) notified us that we are a potentially responsible party under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) and the Clean Water Act for cleanup of a site known as Avery Landing in northern Idaho. At the time we owned a portion of the land at the Avery Landing site, which we acquired in 1980 from the Milwaukee Railroad. The land we owned at the site and adjacent properties were contaminated with petroleum as a result of the Milwaukee Railroad's operations at the site prior to 1980. On July 5, 2011, the EPA issued an Action Memorandum for the Avery Landing site selecting contaminant extraction and off-site disposal as the remedial alternative. On May 23, 2012, we signed a consent order with the EPA pursuant to which we agreed to provide $1.75 million in funding for EPA cleanup on a portion of our property (including the adjacent riverbank owned by the Idaho Department of Lands). The EPA cleanup was completed in October 2012. On April 4, 2013, the EPA issued a unilateral administrative order requiring us to remediate the portion of the Avery Landing site that we owned. Our remediation was completed in October 2013. On September 25, 2015, the EPA sent us a letter asserting that the EPA and the Department of Transportation (the current owner of a portion of the adjacent property remediated by the EPA) (DOT) had incurred $9.8 million in unreimbursed response costs associated with the site and that we were liable for such costs. We have executed six tolling agreements with the EPA and DOT suspending the statute of limitations on the claim until March 31, 2018 in order to facilitate negotiations of a final settlement and release. We accrued $0.2 million for this matter in the first quarter of 2016, an additional $0.8 million in the second quarter of 2016 and an additional $5.0 million in the third quarter of 2017. On February 9, 2018, we executed a Consent Decree with the United States, acting on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency and Department of Transportation, settling the United States’ claims against us for $6 million. On February 12, 2018 the United States filed a lawsuit against us in the United States District Court for the District of Idaho and lodged the Consent Decree with the Court. The United States will publish a Notice of Lodging of the Consent Decree in the Federal Register and after the expiration of a required 30-day public comment period, will advise the Court whether the Consent Decree may be entered. If the Consent Decree is not approved by the Court following the 30-day public comment period, we reserve all defenses to liability and the right to pursue all potentially responsible parties. NOTE 17. SEGMENT INFORMATION Our businesses are organized into three reportable operating segments: Resource, Wood Products and Real Estate. Management activities include planting and harvesting trees and building and maintaining roads. The Resource segment also generates revenues from non-timber resources such as hunting leases, recreation permits and leases, mineral rights leases, biomass production and carbon sequestration. The Wood Products segment manufactures and markets lumber and plywood. The business of our Real Estate segment consists primarily of the sale of land holdings deemed non-strategic or identified as having higher and better use alternatives. The Real Estate segment engages in limited real estate subdivision activities through Potlatch TRS. The reporting segments follow the same accounting policies used for our Consolidated Financial Statements, as described in the summary of significant accounting policies, with the exception of the valuation of inventories. All segment inventories are reported using the average cost method, and the LIFO reserve is recorded at the corporate level. Management evaluates a segment’s performance based upon profit or loss from operations before income taxes. Intersegment revenues are recorded based on prevailing market prices. 70 The following table presents business segment information for each of the past three years. Corporate information is included to reconcile segment data to the Consolidated Financial Statements. (Dollars in thousands) Revenues: 2017 2016 2015 Resource Wood Products Real Estate Intersegment Resource revenues1 Total consolidated revenues Income (loss) before income taxes: Resource Wood Products Real Estate2 Eliminations and adjustments Corporate Operating income Interest expense, net Income before income taxes Depreciation, depletion and amortization: Resource Wood Products Real Estate Corporate Bond discount and deferred loan fees Total depreciation, depletion and amortization Basis of real estate sold: Real Estate Elimination and adjustments Total basis of real estate sold Assets: Resource and Real Estate3 Wood Products Corporate Total consolidated assets Capital Expenditures:4 Resource Wood Products Real Estate Corporate Total capital expenditures $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 278,199 $ 441,157 30,655 750,011 (71,416) 678,595 $ 256,163 $ 367,426 32,604 656,193 (57,094) 599,099 $ 263,875 336,214 28,989 629,078 (53,742) 575,336 106,105 $ 72,166 18,576 (2,705) 194,142 (48,619) 145,523 (27,049) 118,474 $ 20,476 $ 7,347 2 27,825 607 1,480 29,912 $ 7,114 $ (287) 6,827 $ 81,918 $ 24,587 (29,495) (3,001) 74,009 (38,455) 35,554 (28,941) 6,613 $ 24,090 $ 7,357 4 31,451 760 1,979 34,190 $ 8,518 $ (507) 8,011 $ 76,350 (5,235) 16,849 3,283 91,247 (32,340) 58,907 (32,761) 26,146 28,807 6,810 56 35,673 951 1,481 38,105 7,394 (382) 7,012 670,240 $ 154,479 824,719 128,360 953,079 $ 837,630 662,852 $ 131,103 150,855 968,733 813,707 113,974 47,879 927,681 $ 1,016,612 15,120 $ 10,723 87 25,930 2,132 28,062 $ 13,311 $ 5,491 111 18,913 375 19,288 $ 13,497 18,482 184 32,163 569 32,732 1 2 3 4 Intersegment revenues are based on prevailing market prices of logs sold by our Resource segment to the Wood Products segment. In the second quarter of 2016, we sold approximately 172,000 acres of timberlands located in central Idaho for $114 million at a loss of $48.5 million before taxes. Assets are shown on a combined basis for the Resource and Real Estate segments, as we do not report assets separately to management for these segments. Excludes the acquisition of timber and timberlands. 71 All of our wood products facilities and all other assets are located within the continental United States. Geographic information regarding our revenues is as follows: (Dollars in thousands) United States Canada Mexico Other Total consolidated revenues 2017 676,956 481 1,158 — 678,595 $ $ 2016 597,899 173 1,027 — 599,099 $ $ 2015 573,398 851 919 168 575,336 $ $ One customer within our Resource segment accounted for slightly more than 10% of our total consolidated revenues in the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015. NOTE 18. FINANCIAL RESULTS BY QUARTER (UNAUDITED) (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) Revenues Operating income (loss) Net income (loss) Net income (loss) per share1 March 31 June 30 September 30 December 31 Three Months Ended 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 $149,681 $127,896 $163,229 $141,495 $190,441 $174,027 $175,244 $155,681 5,072 $ 40,773 $ (34,228) $ 43,793 $ 38,994 $ 37,048 $ 25,716 $ 23,909 $ 157 $ 24,244 $ (31,238) $ 33,700 $ 27,646 $ 11,588 $ 14,373 $ 16,921 $ Basic Diluted $ $ 0.41 $ 0.41 $ — $ — $ 0.59 $ 0.59 $ (0.77) $ (0.77) $ 0.83 $ 0.82 $ 0.68 $ 0.68 $ 0.28 $ 0.28 $ 0.35 0.35 1 Per share amounts are computed independently for each of the quarters presented. Therefore, the sum of the quarterly per share amounts may not equal the total computed for the year. Our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, include the quarterly results for the first nine months of each respective year. During the fourth quarter of 2017, we incurred $3.4 million in merger-related costs associated with the pending merger with Deltic. See Note 2: Pending Merger with Deltic for additional information. 72 ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE None. ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES We conducted an evaluation (pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act)), under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act) as of December 31, 2017. These disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports that are filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms. Our disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that this information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on the evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2017. Management's Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act of 1934. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Our management, with the participation of our CEO and CFO, assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control- Integrated Framework (2013). Based on our assessment, management believes that, as of December 31, 2017, our internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria. Our independent registered public accounting firm has audited the financial statements included in this report and issued a report which appears on the next page and expresses an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017. Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the latest fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION None. 73 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM To the Stockholders and Board of Directors Potlatch Corporation: Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting We have audited Potlatch Corporation and subsidiaries’ (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, cash flows, and stockholders’ equity for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements), and our report dated February 16, 2018 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. Basis for Opinion The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. 74 Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. /s/ KPMG LLP Seattle, Washington February 16, 2018 75 Part III ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE Certain of the information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the information appearing under the headings "Board of Directors," "Corporate Governance" and "Security Ownership – Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance" from our definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC on or about March 30, 2018. Our Corporate Conduct and Ethics Code, which is applicable to all directors, officers and employees, can be found on our website at www.potlatchcorp.com. We post any amendments to or waivers from our Corporate Conduct and Ethics Code on our website. Executive Officers of the Registrant As of February 16, 2018, information on our executive officers is as follows: Michael J. Covey (age 60), has served as Chief Executive Officer since February 2006 and served as President and Chief Executive Officer from 2006 to March 2013. He has been a director of the company since February 2006 and has served as Chairman of the Board of the company since January 2007. Eric J. Cremers (age 54), has served as President and Chief Operating Officer and a director of the company since March 2013, as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from March 2012 to March 2013, and as Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer from July 2007 to March 2012. Jerald W. Richards (age 49), has served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since September 2013. He was employed by Weyerhaeuser Company and served as Chief Accounting Officer from October 2010 to August 2013, and corporate segment controller from 2008 to October 2010. Thomas J. Temple (age 61), has served as Vice President, Wood Products since February 2012 and as Vice President, Wood Products from January 2009 to February 2012. Darin Ball (age 52), has served as Vice President of Resource since December 2017 and served as Manager of Idaho Resource from 2012 to December 2017. He was Director of Budgeting and Business Development of the company from 2007 to 2012. William R. DeReu (age 51), has served as Vice President, Real Estate since February 2012 and as Vice President, Real Estate from May 2006 to February 2012. Lorrie D. Scott (age 63), has served as Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary since July 2010. Prior to July 2010, she was employed by Weyerhaeuser Realty Investors, Inc. and served as Senior Vice President and General Counsel from October 2007 to July 2010. Stephanie A. Brady (age 50), has served as Controller and Principal Accounting Officer since April 2015. She was employed by Itron, Inc. and served as North America Controller from January 2012 to March 2015 and Director of External Reporting from January 2004 to December 2011. The term of office of the officers of the company expires at the annual meeting of our board and each officer holds office until the officer’s successor is duly elected and qualified or until the earlier of the officer’s death, resignation, retirement, removal by the board or as otherwise provided in our bylaws. 76 ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION Information set forth under the headings "Report of the Executive Compensation and Personnel Policies Committee," "Compensation Discussion and Analysis," "Executive Compensation Tables," “CEO Pay Ratio,” "Compensation of Non-Employee Directors" and "Corporate Governance - Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation" in our definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC on or about March 30, 2018, is incorporated herein by reference. ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS Information regarding any person or group known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of our common stock as well as the security ownership of management set forth under the heading "Security Ownership" in our definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC on or about March 30, 2018, is incorporated herein by reference. ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE The information required by this item regarding certain relationships and related transactions is included under the heading "Corporate Governance - Transactions with Related Persons" in our definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC on or about March 30, 2018, and is incorporated herein by reference. The information required by this item regarding director independence is included under the headings "Board of Directors" and "Corporate Governance - Director Independence" in our definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC on or about March 30, 2018, and is incorporated herein by reference. ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES The information required by this item regarding principal accounting fees and services is included under the heading "Audit Committee Report - Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm in 2017 and 2016" in our definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC on or about March 30, 2018, and is incorporated herein by reference. 77 Part IV ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES (a) (1) Financial Statements: The financial statements required by this item are submitted in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. (a) (2) Financial Statement Schedule: Financial Statement Schedules have been omitted because of the absence of conditions under which they are required or because the required information is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements or the Notes thereto. (a) (3) Exhibits: POTLATCH CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES EXHIBIT NUMBER (2)* Agreement and Plan of Merger dated October 22, 2017 between Potlatch Corporation, Portland Merger LLC and Deltic Timber Corporation, filed as Exhibit (2.1) to the Current Report on Form 8- K filed by the Registrant on October 23, 2017. DESCRIPTION (3)(a)* (3)(b)* (4) (4)(a)* (4)(a)(i)* (4)(a)(ii)* (4)(b)* (4)(b)(i)* (4)(b)(ii)* Second Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, effective February 3, 2006, filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Registrant on February 6, 2006. Bylaws of the Registrant, as amended through February 18, 2009, filed as Exhibit (3)(b) to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Registrant on February 20, 2009. See Exhibits (3)(a) and (3)(b). The Registrant also undertakes to furnish to the SEC, upon request, any instrument defining the rights of holders of long-term debt. Indenture, dated as of November 3, 2009, between the Registrant and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Registrant on November 9, 2009. Form of 7 1/2% Senior Notes due 2019 (included as Exhibit A to the Indenture filed as Exhibit 4(a)). Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of November 3, 2009, between the Registrant and the parties named therein, filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Registrant on November 9, 2009. Indenture, dated as of November 27, 1990, between Original Potlatch and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company (successor in interest to Bankers Trust Company of California, National Association), as trustee, filed as Exhibit (4)(a) to the Original Potlatch Annual Report on Form 10- K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000. (SEC File No. 001-05313) Officer’s Certificate, dated January 24, 1991, filed as Exhibit (4)(a)(i) to the Original Potlatch Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000. (SEC File No. 001- 05313) Officer’s Certificate, dated December 12, 1991, filed as Exhibit (4)(a)(i) to the Original Potlatch Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996. (SEC File No. 001- 05313) 78 EXHIBIT NUMBER (10)(a)1* Potlatch Corporation Management Performance Award Plan, as amended effective December 2, 2004, filed as Exhibit (10)(a) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed by Original Potlatch for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004. (SEC File No. 001-05313) DESCRIPTION (10)(a)(i)1* Amendment to Potlatch Corporation Management Performance Award Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Registrant on December 11, 2008. (10)(b)1* (10)(c)1* Potlatch Corporation Severance Program for Executive Employees, amended and restated effective February 14, 2014, filed as Exhibit (10)(b) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013. Potlatch Corporation Salaried Employees’ Supplemental Benefit Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 1989, and as amended through May 24, 2005, filed as Exhibit (10)(d) to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by Original Potlatch for the quarter ended June 30, 2005. (10)(c)(i)1* Amendment, effective as of January 1, 1998, to Plan described in Exhibit (10)(d), filed as Exhibit (10)(d)(i) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed by Original Potlatch for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003. (SEC File No. 001-5313) (10)(c)(ii)1* Amendment, effective as of December 5, 2008, to Plan described in Exhibit (10)(d), filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Registrant on December 11, 2008. (10)(d)1* (10)(e)(i)1 Potlatch Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors, as amended through May 24, 2005, filed as Exhibit (10)(g) to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by Original Potlatch for the quarter ended June 30, 2005. Potlatch Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan II for Directors, as amended and restated effective May 8, 2014, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Registrant on May 13, 2014, as amended on September 9, 2016. (10)(e)(ii)1* First Amendment to the Potlatch Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors II, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Registrant on December 7, 2017. (10)(f)1* (10)(g)1* (10)(h)1* (10)(i)(i)1* (10)(i)(ii)1* Potlatch Corporation Benefits Protection Trust Agreement, amended and restated effective February 14, 2014, filed as Exhibit (10)(h) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013. Summary of Director Compensation, effective as of May 3, 2017, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Registrant on May 4, 2017. Form of Indemnification Agreement with each director of the Registrant and with each executive officer of the Registrant, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Registrant on September 23, 2009. Potlatch Corporation 2005 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated May 19, 2006, filed as Exhibit (10)(r) to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by the Registrant for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, and as further amended and restated effective September 16, 2006, filed as Exhibit (10)(e) to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Registrant on September 21, 2006. Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (2005 Stock Incentive Plan), as amended and restated May 19, 2006, to be used for restricted stock unit awards to be granted subsequent to May 19, 2006, filed as Exhibit (10)(r)(i) to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by the Registrant for the quarter ended June 30, 2006. 79 EXHIBIT NUMBER (10)(i)(iii)1* DESCRIPTION Form of Performance Share Agreement (2005 Stock Incentive Plan), as amended and restated May 19, 2006, to be used for performance share awards to be granted subsequent to May 19, 2006, filed as Exhibit (10)(r)(ii) to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by the Registrant for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, and as further amended on January 17, 2007, filed as Exhibit (10)(r)(ii) to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Registrant on January 19, 2007. (10)(j)(i)1* (10)(j)(ii)1* Potlatch Corporation 2014 Stock Incentive Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.C to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by the Registrant for the quarter ended June 30, 2014. Potlatch Corporation Restricted Stock Unit Award Notice and Agreement (Directors) 2014 Long- Term Incentive Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Registrant on December 7, 2017. (10)(j)(iii)1* Form of 2014 Performance Share Award Notice and Agreement filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Registrant on May 9, 2014. (10)(j)(iv)1* Form of 2014 RSU Award Notice and Award Agreement filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Registrant on May 9, 2014. (10)(j)(v)1* Form of 2015 Performance Share Award Notice and Agreement filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Registrant on February 18, 2015. (10)(j)(vi)1* Form of 2015 RSU Award Notice and Agreement filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Registrant on February 18, 2015. (10)(k)(i)1* (10)(k)(ii)1* (10)(l)1* (10)(m)1* (10)(n)1* (10)(o)(i)* Potlatch Corporation Management Performance Award Plan II, as amended through February 20, 2008, filed as Exhibit (10)(r)(iv) to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Registrant on February 26, 2008. Amendment to Potlatch Corporation Management Performance Award Plan II, effective June 1, 2008, filed as Exhibit (10)(r)(v) to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Registrant on May 21, 2008. Potlatch Corporation Salaried Supplemental Benefit Plan II, effective December 5, 2008, and amended and restated as of February 14, 2014, filed as Exhibit (10)(t) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013. Potlatch Corporation Annual Incentive Plan, amended and restated effective January 1, 2014, filed as Exhibit (10)(w)(i) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013. Potlatch Corporation Management Deferred Compensation Plan, effective June 1, 2008, amended and restated on February 14, 2014, filed as Exhibit (10)(x) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013. Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of August 12, 2014, among the Registrant and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, as borrowers, KeyBank National Association, as administrative agent, swing line lender and L/C issuer, the Guarantors from time to time party thereto and the Lenders from time to time party thereto, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Registrant on August 14, 2014. (10)(o)(ii)* First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated January 16, 2015, filed as Exhibit (10)(c) to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2015. (10)(o)(iii)* Second Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated November 9, 2015, filed as Exhibit (10)(r) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015. 80 EXHIBIT NUMBER (10)(p)(i)* DESCRIPTION Amended and Restated Term Loan Agreement, dated as of December 5, 2014, by and among the Registrant and Potlatch Forest Holdings, Inc., as borrowers, Northwest Farm Credit Services, PCA as administrative agent, the Guarantors from time to time party thereto and the Lenders from time to time party thereto, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Registrant on December 9, 2014. (10)(p)(ii)* First Amendment to Term Loan Agreement dated as of February 29, 2016, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Registrant on March 3, 2016. (10)(q)* (10)(r)* (12) (21) (23) (24) (31) (32) (101) Loan Agreement dated August 1, 2016 by and among Nez Perce County, Idaho, Potlatch Corporation, Potlatch Forest Holdings, Inc., Potlatch Lake States Timberlands, LLC, Potlatch Land and Lumber, LLC, Minnesota Timberlands, LLC and Potlatch Timberlands, LLC, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Registrant on August 19, 2016. Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of February 14, 2018, by and among the Registrant and its wholly-owned subsidiaries as borrowers, Key Bank National Association as Administrative agent, swing line lender and L/C issuer, the Guarantors from time to time party thereto and the Lenders from time to time party thereto, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Registrant on February 15, 2018. Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges. Potlatch Corporation Subsidiaries. Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. Powers of Attorney. Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications. Furnished statements of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer under 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. The following financial information from Potlatch Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, filed on February 16, 2018, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, (iii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2017 and 2016, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, (v) the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 and (vi) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. * Incorporated by reference. 1 Management contract or compensatory plan, contract or arrangement. 81 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. POTLATCH CORPORATION (Registrant) By /s/ MICHAEL J. COVEY Michael J. Covey Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer Date: February 16, 2018 Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below on February 16, 2018, by the following persons on behalf of the registrant in the capacities indicated. BY BY /s/ MICHAEL J. COVEY Director, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer Michael J. Covey (Principal Executive Officer) /s/ ERIC J. CREMERS Director, President and Chief Operating Officer Eric J. Cremers BY /s/ JERALD W. RICHARDS Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Jerald W. Richards BY /s/ STEPHANIE A. BRADY Controller (Principal Accounting Officer) Stephanie A. Brady * Linda M. Breard * William L. Driscoll * Charles P. Grenier * John S. Moody * Lawrence S. Peiros * Gregory L. Quesnel Director Director Director Director Director Director *By /s/ LORRIE D. SCOTT Lorrie D. Scott (Attorney-in-fact) 82 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Linda M. Beard Retired Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Washington Seattle, Washington Director since 2015 Charles P. Grenier Retired Executive Vice President Plum Creek Timber Company Seattle, Washington Director since 2013 Michael J. Covey Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Potlatch Corporation Director since 2006 Eric J. Cremers President and Chief Operating Officer Potlatch Corporation Director since 2013 William L. Driscoll Partner Lincoln Park Partners Real Estate Management Tacoma, Washington Director since 2004 OFFICERS Darin R. Ball Vice President, Resource Mark J. Benson Vice President, Public Affairs John S. Moody* President Parkside Capital, LLC Fund Management Houston, Texas Director since 2006 Lawrence S. Peiros Retired Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer The Clorox Company Oakland, California Director since 2003 Gregory L. Quesnel Retired President and Chief Executive Officer CNF, Inc. Palo Alto, California Director since 2000 *Independent Lead Director William R. DeReu Vice President, Real Estate Jerald W. Richards Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Stephanie A. Brady Controller and Principal Accounting Officer Robert L. Schwartz Vice President, Human Resources Michael J. Covey Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Eric J. Cremers President and Chief Operating Officer Lorrie D. Scott Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary Thomas J. Temple Vice President, Wood Products CORPORATE INFORMATION Executive Offices 601 West First Avenue, Suite 1600 Spokane, Washington 99201-3807 509-835-1500 www.potlatchcorp.com Transfer Agent and Registrar Computershare P.O. Box 505000 Louisville, KY 40233 866-593-2351 www.computershare.com/investor Stock Listing Potlatch common stock is traded under the symbol PCH on NASDAQ. Distribution Reinvestment For the convenience of our registered stockholders, dividend distributions may be reinvested in Potlatch common stock. For information, contact Computershare at 866-593-2351. Annual Meeting The annual meeting of stockholders will be held: May 7, 2018, at 9 a.m. Potlatch Corporation Corporate Offices 601 West First Avenue, Suite 1600 Spokane, Washington 99201 Additional Information Copies of our filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Corporate Conduct and Ethics Code, and Charters of the Committees of the Board of Directors are available, free of charge, at our Web address, www.potlatchcorp.com, or upon written request to the Corporate Secretary at our executive offices. Forward-Looking Statements This report contains forward-looking statements that reflect management’s current views regarding future events based on estimates and assumptions, and are therefore subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties. For a nonexclusive listing of forward- looking statements and potential factors affecting our business, please refer to “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information” on Page 1 and “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, which is included as part of this report. These forward- looking statements are made as of the date of this report and, except as required under applicable law, we do not intend to issue updates concerning any future revisions of management’s views to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this report. SFI�-Certified Paper Potlatch Corporation’s 2017 Annual Report is printed entirely on SFI- Certified paper. The Annual Report is printed on Domtar SFI-Certified paper manufactured using fiber from responsible and legal sources. FSC BUREAU VERITAS Certification 

Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above