B u s i n e s s M e m b e r
Diamond Member
2016
Annual Repor t
October 27, 2016
Dear PriceSmart Stockholders:
Our Company’s financial results for fiscal year 2016 that ended August 31, 2016, include sales of $2.8 billion compared
to sales of $2.7 billion for the prior fiscal year, an increase of 3.7%, and after tax profits of $88.7 million compared to after tax
profits of $89.1 million for the prior fiscal year. 2016 earnings per share are $2.92 compared to $2.95 for the prior fiscal year.
During this past fiscal year, our year over year sales results were especially strong in Panama, Guatemala and Honduras
in comparison to other markets including Colombia and Trinidad where falling commodity prices, especially in the energy sector,
negatively impacted the economies of those export dependent markets weakening consumer demand and causing turbulence in
the foreign exchange rates for their currencies.
Fiscal year 2016 after tax earnings did not meet our expectations primarily because of lower year over year sales growth,
low product margins in our Colombia market and an increase in our corporate expense ratios. The sales and profit challenges we
experienced during fiscal 2016 have encouraged our management team and Board of Directors to review our Company’s strategy
to address the challenges we face and also take advantage of the opportunities in our markets as we move forward into a rapidly
changing business environment. The balance of my letter summarizes what we believe to be a sound strategy for our business.
Our strategy grows out of a clear understanding of our competitive strengths and advantages in our markets. We occupy
a unique niche as the only warehouse club operator in our markets. We have nearly three million middle to high income loyal
business and family members. We sell unique, high quality and competitively priced products that are sourced from all over the
world. We are efficient in distributing merchandise from the manufacturers to our members. We have learned how to do business
in challenging business environments. We value our employees and compensate them well, in turn, our employees are devoted
to PriceSmart.
Based on our unique strengths and competitive advantages, we have identified the following strategies:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Increasing sales and profits in our current locations by adding more parking spaces and sales floor space in our
higher sales volume locations. We have already completed two locations – Barranquilla, Colombia and Sal
Salvador, El Salvador and others are in process.
Opening multi-purpose in-country distribution centers. We conceive of the in-country distribution centers as a
hub for various activities including more efficient distribution of merchandise, resources to package and process
merchandise and delivery for business and consumer orders.
Broadening the range of products and services we provide to our nearly 3 million members in order to increase
the value of PriceSmart membership.
Adding more locations in our markets. We believe that there are opportunities to open additional PriceSmart
locations in some of our markets, especially Colombia. With the opening of our seventh location in Chia
(Bogota suburb), Colombia now has more locations than any of our other markets.
Identifying new markets. We continue to evaluate other South America countries for future PriceSmart
expansion. Colombia has been a real learning experience that will inform us as to where and how best to
expand to other countries.
We recognize that our company’s success depends on the ability of our executives, managers and all of our employees.
I am very proud of our team and would like to recognize two of our founding executives who have announced their retirement.
Our General Counsel Robert Gans joined our Company immediately after we incorporated as a real estate company in 1994. He
has played a highly significant role contributing to our success in so many ways. Tom Martin is retiring after serving as
PriceSmart’s Executive Vice President for Merchandising since our company was founded. He came to work for the Price
Company in 1977 and made the decision to continue with us after the Costco merger. Tom has made enormous contributions to
PriceSmart’s success. From a personal perspective, I am going to miss Bob and Tom very much. Fortunately, we have a new
and highly capable General Counsel, Francisco Velasco. Jesus Von Chong, an experienced and talented merchant who started
with PriceSmart in Panama in 1996, is our new Executive Vice President of Merchandising.
In my capacity as President of our family Foundation, Price Philanthropies, I would like to share with you some news
about our efforts in social responsibility. Aprender y Crecer, operating in eight of our Spanish speaking countries, is providing
school supplies to 75,000 public school children. Our Foundation also contributes to human service organizations throughout
the region in which PriceSmart does business. We have recently funded two youth centers in Honduras and made a donation to
the Children’s Hospital in Costa Rica to purchase medical equipment for their organ transplant department.
On behalf of myself, our CEO Jose Luis Laparte, and our Board of Directors, best wishes for a wonderful holiday season
and a healthy and happy New Year.
Sincerely,
Robert E. Price
PRICESMART, INC.
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND
OTHER INFORMATION
August 31, 2016
Selected Financial Data
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of August 31, 2016 and 2015
Consolidated Statements of Income for each of the three years in the period ended August 31, 2016
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for each of the three years in the period ended August 31, 2016
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for each of the three years in the period ended August 31, 2016
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the three years in the period ended August 31, 2016
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Directors and Executive Officers of the Company
Additional Information
Page
1
3
38
39
41
42
43
44
45
83
86
90
i
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
PRICESMART, INC.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The selected consolidated financial data presented below is derived from the Company's consolidated financial
statements and accompanying notes. This selected financial data should be read in conjunction with “Management's Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the consolidated financial statements and accompanying
notes thereto included elsewhere in this report.
2016
Years Ended August 31,
2014
(in thousands, except income per common share)
2013
2015
2012
OPERATING RESULTS DATA:
Net warehouse club sales
Export sales
Membership income
Other income
Total revenues
Total cost of goods sold
Total selling, general and administrative
Preopening expenses
Loss/(gain) on disposal of assets
Operating income
Total other income (expense)
Income from continuing operations before
provision for income taxes, losses of
unconsolidated affiliates and net income
attributable to noncontrolling interests
Provision for income taxes
Income/(loss) of unconsolidated affiliates
Net income from continuing operations
attributable to PriceSmart
Discontinued operations income (loss), net of
tax
Net income attributable to PriceSmart
INCOME PER COMMON SHARE -
BASIC:
Income from continuing operations
attributable to PriceSmart
Basic net income per common share
attributable to PriceSmart
INCOME PER COMMON SHARE -
DILUTED:
Income from continuing operations
attributable to PriceSmart
Diluted net income per common share
attributable to PriceSmart
Weighted average common shares - basic
Weighted average common shares - diluted
$
$
$
$
$
$ 2,820,740 $ 2,721,132 $ 2,444,314 $ 2,239,266 $ 1,999,364
15,320
26,957
3,522
2,045,163
1,715,981
220,639
617
312
107,614
(4,900)
23,059
33,820
3,667
2,299,812
1,929,428
240,924
1,525
889
127,046
(3,835)
33,279
43,673
4,519
2,802,603
2,352,839
297,656
3,737
2,005
146,366
(9,770)
31,279
38,063
3,911
2,517,567
2,113,664
262,420
3,331
1,445
136,707
(2,458)
33,813
45,781
4,842
2,905,176
2,449,626
316,474
1,191
1,162
136,723
(5,483)
131,240
(42,849)
332
136,596
(47,566)
94
134,249
(41,372)
9
123,211
(38,942)
(4)
102,714
(35,053)
(15)
88,723
89,124
92,886
84,265
67,646
—
88,723 $
—
89,124 $
—
92,886 $
—
84,265 $
(25)
67,621
2.92 $
2.95 $
3.07 $
2.78 $
2.24
2.92 $
2.95 $
3.07 $
2.78 $
2.24
2.92 $
2.95 $
3.07 $
2.78 $
2.24
2.92 $
2.95 $
3.07 $
2.78 $
29,928
29,933
29,848
29,855
29,747
29,757
29,647
29,657
2.24
29,554
29,566
1
PRICESMART, INC.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA- (Continued)
BALANCE SHEET DATA:
Cash and cash equivalents
Restricted cash
Total assets
Long-term debt
Total PriceSmart stockholders’ equity
Dividends paid on common stock(1)
2016
2015
As of August 31,
2014
(in thousands)
2013
2012
199,522 $
$
$
3,194 $
$ 1,096,735 $
88,107 $
$
638,071 $
$
21,274 $
$
157,072 $
1,525 $
991,224 $
90,534 $
566,584 $
21,126 $
137,098 $
29,366 $
937,338 $
91,439 $
548,265 $
21,144 $
121,874 $
40,759 $
826,039 $
73,020 $
481,049 $
18,133 $
91,248
37,746
735,712
78,659
418,914
18,120
(1) On February 3, 2016, February 4, 2015, January 23, 2014, November 27, 2012, and January 25, 2012, the Company declared
cash dividends on its common stock.
2
PRICESMART, INC.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This annual report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements concerning PriceSmart Inc.'s ("PriceSmart", the
"Company" or "we") anticipated future revenues and earnings, adequacy of future cash flows, proposed warehouse club openings,
the Company's performance relative to competitors and related matters. These forward-looking statements include, but are not
limited to, statements containing the words “expect,” “believe,” “will,” “may,” “should,” “project,” “estimate,” “anticipated,”
“scheduled,” and like expressions, and the negative thereof. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could
cause actual results to differ materially, including the following risks: our financial performance is dependent on international
operations, which exposes us to various risks; any failure by us to manage our widely dispersed operations could adversely affect
our business; we face significant competition; future sales growth depends, in part, on our ability to successfully open new
warehouse clubs and grow sales in our existing locations; we might not identify in a timely manner or effectively respond to
changes in consumer preferences for merchandise, which could adversely affect our relationship with members, demand for our
products and market share; although we have begun to offer limited online shopping to our members, our sales could be adversely
affected if one or more major international online retailers were to enter our markets or if other competitors were to offer a
superior online experience; our profitability is vulnerable to cost increases; we face difficulties in the shipment of and risks
inherent in the importation of, merchandise to our warehouse clubs; we are exposed to weather and other natural disaster risks
that might not be adequately compensated by insurance; general economic conditions could adversely impact our business in
various respects; our failure to maintain our brand and reputation could adversely affect our results of operations; we are subject
to risks associated with possible changes in our relationships with third parties with which we do business, as well as the
performance of such third parties; we rely extensively on computer systems to process transactions, summarize results and
manage our business, and failure to adequately maintain our systems and disruptions in our systems could harm our business and
adversely affect our results of operations; we could be subject to additional tax liabilities or subject to reserves on the
recoverability of tax receivables; a few of our stockholders own approximately 25.3% of our voting stock as of August 31, 2016,
which may make it difficult to complete some corporate transactions without their support and may impede a change in control;
failure to attract and retain qualified employees, increases in wage and benefit costs, changes in laws and other labor issues could
materially adversely affect our financial performance; we face the possibility of operational interruptions related to union work
stoppages; we are subject to volatility in foreign currency exchange rates and limits on our ability to convert foreign currencies
into U.S. dollars; we face the risk of exposure to product liability claims, a product recall and adverse publicity; any failure to
maintain the security of the information relating to our company, members, employees and vendors that we hold, whether as a
result of cybersecurity attacks on our information systems, failure of internal controls, employee negligence or malfeasance or
otherwise, could damage our reputation with members, employees, vendors and others, could disrupt our operations, could cause
us to incur substantial additional costs and to become subject to litigation and could materially adversely affect our operating
results; we are subject to payment related risks; changes in accounting standards and assumptions, projections, estimates and
judgments by management related to complex accounting matters could significantly affect our financial condition and results of
operations; we face compliance risks related to our international operations; if remediation costs or hazardous substance
contamination levels at certain properties for which we maintain financial responsibility exceed management's current
expectations, our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely impacted. The risks described above as well as
the other risks detailed in the Company's U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) reports, including the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K filed for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2016 filed on October 27, 2016 pursuant to the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, see “Part II - Item 1A - Risk Factors,” could materially and adversely affect our business, financial
condition and results of operations. These risks are not the only risks that the Company faces. The Company could also be affected
by additional factors that apply to all companies operating globally and in the U.S., as well as other risks that are not presently
known to the Company or that the Company currently considers to be immaterial.
3
Our business consists primarily of operating international membership shopping warehouse clubs similar to, but smaller
in size than, warehouse clubs in the United States. We operate in 13 countries/territories that are located in Latin America and
the Caribbean. Our ownership in all operating subsidiaries as of August 31, 2016 is 100%, and they are presented on a
consolidated basis. The number of warehouse clubs in operation as of August 31, 2016 for each country or territory are as follows:
Country/Territory
Colombia
Costa Rica
Panama
Trinidad
Dominican Republic
Guatemala
El Salvador
Honduras
Aruba
Barbados
U.S. Virgin Islands
Jamaica
Nicaragua
Totals
Number of
Warehouse Clubs
in Operation as of
August 31, 2015
Number of
Warehouse Clubs
in Operation as of
August 31, 2016
6
6
5
4
3
3
2
3
1
1
1
1
1
37
6
6
5
4
3
3
2
3
1
1
1
1
2
38
Actual and
Anticipated
warehouse
club openings
in fiscal year 2017
1
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1
In fiscal year 2014, we purchased land in Pereira and Medellin, Colombia and leased land in the city of Bogota,
Colombia. We built new warehouse clubs on these three sites. During fiscal year 2015 we opened the Bogota location in
October 2014 and the Pereira and Medellin locations in November 2014. Together with the three warehouse clubs that were
already operating in Colombia (one in Barranquilla and two in Cali), these three new clubs brought the number of operating
PriceSmart warehouse clubs in Colombia to six at the end of fiscal year 2015. We constructed a new warehouse club on land
acquired in May 2015 in Chia, Colombia that opened in September 2016, fiscal year 2017, bringing the total of warehouse clubs
operating in Colombia to seven. In September 2014, we acquired land in La Chorrera ("Costa Verde"), west of Panama City,
Panama, on which we opened our fifth PriceSmart warehouse club in Panama in June 2015. In April 2015, we acquired land in
Managua, Nicaragua. We constructed and then opened a warehouse club on this site in November 2015. On December 4, 2015
we signed an option to acquire two properties and then swap them for 59,353 square feet of land adjacent to our San Pedro Sula
warehouse club in Honduras. We exercised this option and completed the swap during May 2016. We will use the acquired land
to expand the parking lot for the San Pedro Sula warehouse club.
Our warehouse clubs and local distribution centers are located in Latin America and the Caribbean, and our corporate
headquarters, U.S. buying operations and regional distribution centers are located primarily in the United States. During the
second quarter of fiscal year 2015, the Company created a new reportable segment comprised of its Colombia Operations and
separated the Colombia Operations from the Latin America Operations, renaming that reportable segment Central America
Operations. The Company has made this change as a result of the information that the Company's chief operating decision maker
regularly reviews for purposes of allocating resources and assessing performance and the growing level of investment and sales
activity in Colombia. Therefore, beginning in the second quarter of fiscal year 2015, the Company has reported its financial
performance based on these new segments and retrospectively adopted this change for the disclosure of financial information
presented by segment. The Company’s operating segments are the United States, Central America, the Caribbean and Colombia.
General Market Factors
Our sales and profits vary from market to market depending on general economic factors, including GDP growth;
consumer spending patterns; foreign currency exchange rates; political policies and social conditions; local demographic
characteristics (such as population growth); the number of years PriceSmart has operated in a particular market; and the level of
retail and wholesale competition in that market.
Our consolidated results of operations during the past two fiscal years were adversely affected by events in Colombia,
resulting largely from a major decline in the value of the Colombian peso (COP) relative to the U.S. dollar beginning in August
2014 which negatively impacted sales and margins in that market. Over the course of fiscal year 2016, the devaluation of the
Colombian peso against the U.S. dollar resulted in decreased U.S. dollar reported warehouse clubs sales, after translation by
approximately 26% when compared to fiscal year 2015. However, by the end of the fiscal year, the value of the Colombian peso
was approximately 5.4% higher than at the end of fiscal year 2015, following the approximately 60% overall devaluation that
occurred in fiscal year 2015. A devaluation of the COP not only reduces the value of sales and membership income that is
4
generated in Colombia when translated to U.S. dollars for our consolidated results, but also increases the local currency price of
imported merchandise, which impacts demand for a significant portion of the Company’s merchandise offering. This, along with
the fact that we are still relatively new in the Colombia market, and the sophisticated level of competition in that market, impacted
overall business performance resulting in an operating loss in Colombia. Certain of our Central American and Caribbean markets
have experienced some slowing of overall economic activity during the fiscal year which may continue to impact the level of
consumer spending in the coming months. In particular, Trinidad’s economy, with its dependence on oil and gas exports as a
major source of income and resulting government policy to manage its foreign exchange reserves, has been experiencing overall
difficult economic conditions with a corresponding impact on consumer spending.
Our capture of retail and wholesale sales can vary from market to market due to competition and the availability of other
retail options for the consumer. In larger, more developed countries, such as Costa Rica, Panama and Colombia, customers have
many alternatives available to them to satisfy their shopping needs, and therefore, our market share is less than in other smaller
countries, such as Jamaica and Nicaragua, where consumers have a limited number of shopping options.
Demographic characteristics within each of our markets can also affect both the overall level of sales and also future
sales growth opportunities. Island countries such as Aruba, Barbados and the U.S. Virgin Islands offer us limited upside for sales
growth given their overall market size. Countries with a smaller upper and middle class consumer population, such as Honduras,
El Salvador, Jamaica and Nicaragua, also have a more limited potential opportunity for sales growth as compared to more
developed countries with a larger upper and middle class consumer population.
Political and other factors in each of our markets may have significant effects on our business. For example, when
national elections are being held, the political situation can introduce uncertainty about how the leadership change may impact
the economy and affect near-term consumer spending. The need for increased tax revenue in certain countries can cause changes
in tax policies affecting consumer’s personal tax rates, and/or added consumption taxes, such as VAT (value-added taxes)
effectively raising the prices of various products. In addition, if a major employer in a market reduces its work force, as has
happened in the past in Aruba and Costa Rica, overall consumer spending can suffer.
Currency fluctuations can be the largest variable affecting our overall sales and profit performance, as we experienced
in fiscal year 2015 and 2016, as many of our markets are susceptible to foreign currency exchange rate volatility. Currency
exchange rate changes either increase or decrease the cost to our subsidiaries of imported products purchased in U.S. dollars and
priced in local currency. In fiscal year 2016, approximately 77.3% of our net warehouse sales were in currencies other than the
U.S. dollar. Meanwhile, approximately 52% of net warehouse sales were comprised of sales of products we purchased in U.S.
dollars that were sold in countries whose currencies were other than the U.S. dollar.
Currency exchange rate fluctuations also affect our consolidated sales and membership income as local-currency-
denominated sales are translated to U.S. dollars, which can impact year over year growth when measured in U.S. dollars compared
to local currency growth rates. In addition, we revalue on a monthly basis all U.S. dollar-denominated monetary assets and
liabilities within our markets that do not use the U.S. dollar as their functional currency. These monetary assets and liabilities
include, but are not limited to, excess cash permanently reinvested offshore, U.S. dollar-denominated long-term debt used to
finance land acquisitions and the construction of warehouse clubs, and U.S. dollar-denominated accounts payable related to the
purchase of merchandise. We report the gains or losses associated with the revaluation of these monetary assets and liabilities
on our Consolidated Statements of Income under the heading “Other income (expense), net.”
Where possible, we seek to minimize the impact of negative foreign exchange fluctuations on our results by utilizing
from time to time one or more of the following strategies: (1) adjusting prices on goods acquired in U.S. dollars on a periodic
basis to maintain our target margins after taking into account changes in exchange rates and our competition; (2) obtaining local
currency loans from banks within certain markets where it is economical to do so and where management believes the risk of
devaluation and the level of U.S. dollar denominated liabilities warrants this action; (3) reducing the time between the acquisition
of product in U.S. dollars and the settlement of that purchase in local currency; (4) maintaining a balance between assets held in
local currency and in U.S. dollars; and (5) entering into cross-currency interest rate swaps and non-deliverable forward contracts.
We have local-currency-denominated long-term loans in Honduras and Guatemala and have employed cross-currency interest
rate swaps in Colombia, Costa Rica and Honduras and non-deliverable forward contracts in Costa Rica and Colombia. Future
volatility regarding currencies could have a material impact on our operations in future periods; however, there is no way to
accurately forecast the impact of the change in rates on our future demand for imported products, reported sales or financial
results.
From time to time we have experienced a lack of availability of U.S. dollars in certain markets (U.S. dollar illiquidity).
This impedes our ability to convert local currencies obtained through warehouse sales into U.S. dollars to settle the U.S. dollar
liabilities associated with our imported products. In the second half of fiscal year 2016 and continuing into fiscal year 2017, we
are experiencing this situation in Trinidad (“TT”). We are limited in our ability to convert TT dollars that we generate through
sales of merchandise into U.S. dollars to settle U.S. dollar liabilities, increasing our foreign exchange exposure to any devaluation
of the TT dollar. The June 2016 International Monetary Fund Country Report for Trinidad and Tobago suggests that the TT dollar
5
could be overvalued, in the range of 20%-50% per U.S. dollar. We are working with our banks to source other tradeable currencies
(such as Euros and Canadian dollars), but until the central bank makes more U.S. dollars available, this condition will continue.
As of August 31, 2016, we have net U.S. dollar denominated liabilities of approximately $18.9 million that would be exposed to
a potential devaluation of Trinidad dollars. If for example, a hypothetical 20% devaluation of the TT currency occurred, the net
effect on other expense would be approximately $3.8 million. To the extent we are unable to exchange TT dollars for U.S. dollars,
this causes delays in payments owed to us by our Trinidad subsidiary. This, in turn, reduces our ability to deploy that cash for
corporate purposes. The Trinidad government is aware that having limited tradable currency poses challenges to U.S. companies
doing business in Trinidad, including PriceSmart. However, until such time that the uncertain state of tradable currency is
resolved, we plan to take steps to limit our exposure. We plan to reduce new shipments of merchandise to Trinidad from our
distribution center in Miami to levels that generally align with our Trinidad subsidiary’s ability to pay for the merchandise in U.S.
dollars. Although the situation is dynamic, based on recent levels of tradable currency available, we anticipate reducing U.S.
shipments to Trinidad by approximately 20% over the next three months. This is likely to result in our Trinidad subsidiary
running out of certain merchandise, which could negatively impact sales in Trinidad in the second fiscal quarter by an estimated
$8-$10 million. These actions do not impact merchandise on hand or currently in route from our Miami distribution center to
Trinidad, nor do they impact our plans to stock merchandise we obtain locally in Trinidad. We plan to increase or decrease
shipments from the U.S. in line with our ability to exchange TT dollars for other hard currencies. We will continue to seek to
maximize the level of tradable currency our Trinidad subsidiary can obtain.
Business Strategy
Our business strategy is to offer for sale to businesses and families a limited number of stock keeping units (SKU's)
covering a wide range of products in high volumes and at the lowest possible prices. We charge an annual membership fee to
our customers. These fees, combined with warehouse and distribution operating efficiencies and volume purchasing, enable us
to operate our business on lower merchandise margins than conventional retail stores and wholesale suppliers. The combination
of annual membership fees, operating efficiencies and low margins enable us to offer our members high quality merchandise at
very competitive prices which, in turn, enhances the membership proposition.
Current and Future Management Actions
Generally, our operating efficiencies, earnings and cash flow improve as sales increase. Higher sales provide greater
purchasing power which often translates into lower cost of merchandise from our suppliers and lower prices for our members.
Higher sales, coupled with continuous efforts to improve efficiencies through our distribution network and within our warehouse
clubs, also give us the opportunity to leverage our operating costs and reduce prices for our members.
We seek to grow sales by increasing transaction size and shopping frequency and by providing high quality, differentiated
merchandise at a good value. We also grow sales by attracting new members to our existing warehouse clubs and improving the
capability and capacity of our existing warehouse clubs to serve the growing membership base and level of sales in those
locations. Finally, sales growth is also achieved when we add new warehouse clubs in those markets that can support that growth.
Sales during fiscal year 2016 were positively impacted by the three new warehouse clubs that opened in Colombia in the fall of
2014, another new warehouse club in Panama that opened in June 2015 and a new warehouse club in Nicaragua that opened in
November 2015. Although we recognize that opening new warehouse club locations in certain existing markets can have adverse
short-term implications for comparable store growth, as the new warehouse club will often attract sales from existing locations,
each decision to add a location in an existing market is based on a long-term outlook. Overall, for fiscal year 2016, net warehouse
sales increased 3.7%.
One of the distinguishing features of the warehouse club format is the role membership plays both in terms of pricing
and member loyalty. Membership fees are considered a component of overall gross margin and therefore allow us to reduce
merchandise prices. In most of our markets, the annual membership fee is the equivalent of U.S. $35 for both business members
and non-business “Diamond” members. In Colombia, the membership fee has been 65,000 (COP) (including VAT) since our
initial entrance into the Colombian market. The Colombian peso (COP) was trading at approximately 2,000 COP to $1.00 US
dollar at that time. More recently, the Colombian peso has been trading above 3,000 COP to $1.00 US dollar so that the converted
membership price in U.S. dollars has gone from approximately U.S. $30 to approximately U.S. $20. We have not raised the
Colombian peso price of membership in Colombia because our business is new and we want to avoid decisions that could
negatively impact member satisfaction. In addition to the standard warehouse club membership, we offer in Costa Rica what we
call Platinum membership for $75. A Platinum membership earns a 2% rebate on annual purchases up to a maximum of $500
rebate per year.
Logistics and distribution efficiencies are an important part of what allows us to deliver high quality merchandise at low
prices to our members. We acquire a significant amount of merchandise internationally, which we receive primarily at our Miami
distribution centers. We then ship the merchandise either directly to our warehouse clubs or to regional distribution centers located
in some of our larger markets. Our ability to efficiently receive, handle and distribute merchandise to the point where our
members put that merchandise into their shopping carts has a significant impact on our level of operating expenses and ultimately
6
how low we can price our merchandise. We continue to explore ways to improve efficiency, reduce costs and ensure a good flow
of merchandise to our warehouse clubs. We have added local and regional distribution centers in several of our markets to
improve merchandise flow and in-stock conditions and reduce operating costs, the benefit of which can be passed on to our
members in the form of lower merchandise prices. These locations are generally leased, and the addition of new locations or
expansion of current capacity will not require significant investment. Additionally, we have announced that in March 2016, we
entered into a contract, subject to customary contingencies, to acquire a distribution center in Medley, Miami-Dade County,
Florida, into which we will transfer the majority of our current Miami distribution center activities once the construction of the
building is complete and the building is ready for occupancy. We currently expect completion to be in first half of calendar year
2017. This new distribution facility will increase our ability to efficiently receive, handle and distribute merchandise.
We offer our members alternatives to in-club shopping through our e-commerce platform which enables on-line access
to purchase merchandise in different ways. Members have the ability to purchase certain merchandise that is not stocked in their
local warehouse clubs by placing an order that we fulfill by shipping the merchandise from our U.S. distribution warehouse for
pick-up at the member's local warehouse club location. In Colombia, members also can purchase in-club merchandise on-line
from warehouse clubs located within the market and have it delivered to their home or office via a third-party delivery service.
We have been expanding our online offerings, and while the percentage of sales through these channels relative to our overall
sales is small, we believe it is an important and growing way to serve our current members and attract new members.
Purchasing land and constructing warehouse clubs is generally our largest ongoing capital investment. Securing land
for warehouse club locations is challenging within our markets, especially in Colombia, because suitable sites at economically
feasible prices are difficult to find. While our preference is to own rather than lease real estate, we have entered into real estate
leases in certain cases (most recently our Bogota, Colombia site) and will likely do so in the future. Real estate ownership
provides a number of advantages as compared to leasing, including lower operating expenses, flexibility to expand or otherwise
enhance our buildings, long-term control over the use of the property and the residual value that the real estate may have in future
years. In order to secure warehouse club locations, we occasionally have purchased more land than is actually needed for the
warehouse club facility. To the extent that we acquire property in excess of what is needed for a particular warehouse club, we
generally have looked to either sell or develop the excess property. Excess land at Alajuela (Costa Rica) and Brisas (Panama) is
being developed by joint ventures formed by us and the sellers of the property. We are employing a similar development strategy
for the excess land at the San Fernando, Trinidad and Arroyo Hondo, Dominican Republic locations where the properties are
fully owned by us. The profitable sale or development of real estate is highly dependent on real estate market conditions.
In response to the devaluation of the Colombia peso, we have been working to minimize the price increases and resulting
impact on demand on imported items by (1) seeking ways to further reduce costs throughout the supply chain; (2) expanding our
use of local suppliers, particularly with regard to private-label branded product; and (3) continuing to offer value and merchandise
differentiation to our members. Ensuring long-term growth in the Colombia market is a key strategic priority. We are prepared
to accept lower merchandise margins and profits in Colombia in order to solidify our market position for the future. We believe
these actions are having a positive effect as evidenced by continued new member sign-ups, improving membership renewal rates,
and growth in average transaction value when measured in local currency. We remain committed to growing our presence in
Colombia, and we constructed a new warehouse club in Chia, Colombia that opened in September 2016, fiscal year 2017, bringing
the total of warehouse clubs operating in Colombia to seven, the most of any of our countries.
The lack of availability of U.S. dollars in our Trinidad (“TT”) market (U.S. dollar illiquidity) impedes our ability to
convert local TT dollars obtained through warehouse sales into U.S. dollars to settle the U.S. dollar liabilities associated with our
imported products. We will continue to seek to maximize the level of tradeable currency our Trinidad subsidiary can obtain from
our relationship banks, but we will begin limiting our shipments of merchandise to Trinidad in line with what our Trinidad
subsidiary can pay for in tradeable currency.
Financial highlights for the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2016 included:
(cid:120) Net warehouse club sales increased 1.3% over the comparable prior year period. We ended the quarter with 38 warehouse
clubs compared to 37 warehouse clubs at the end of the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2015.
(cid:120) Comparable warehouse club sales (that is, sales in the warehouse clubs that have been open for greater than 13 1/2
calendar months) for the 14 weeks ended September 4, 2016 decreased 1.2%.
(cid:120) Membership income for the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2016 increased 0.7% to $11.6 million.
(cid:120) Warehouse gross profits (net warehouse club sales less associated cost of goods sold) in the quarter increased 1.2% over
the prior-year period, and warehouse gross profits as a percent of net warehouse club sales were 14.7%, a decrease of 2
basis points (0.02%) from the same period last year.
(cid:120) Operating income for the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2016 was $32.8 million, a decrease of $2.1 million compared to
the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2015.
(cid:120) Our effective tax rate decreased in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2016 to 30.4% from 33.3% in the fourth quarter of
fiscal year 2015. This reduction in. our effective tax rate contributed approximately $0.06 per diluted share for the three-
month period.
7
(cid:120) Net income for the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2016 was $22.3 million, or $0.74 per diluted share, compared to $22.4
million, or $0.75 per diluted share, in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2015.
Financial highlights for fiscal year 2016 included:
(cid:120) Net warehouse club sales increased 3.7% over the comparable prior year period. We ended the year with 38 warehouse
clubs compared to 37 warehouse clubs at the end of the fiscal year 2015. Comparable warehouse club sales (that is,
sales in the warehouse clubs that have been open for greater than 13 1/2 calendar months) for the 53 weeks ended
September 4, 2016 decreased 0.8%.
(cid:120) Membership income for the fiscal year 2016 increased 4.8% to $45.8 million.
(cid:120) Warehouse gross profits (net warehouse club sales less associated cost of goods sold) decreased 0.8% over the prior year
period and warehouse gross profits as a percent of net warehouse club sales were 14.3%, a decrease of 40 basis points
(0.40%) from the same period last year.
(cid:120) Operating income for fiscal year 2016 was $136.7 million, a decrease of $(9.6) million compared to fiscal year 2015.
(cid:120) We had a $(900,000) net loss from currency exchange transactions in the current year compared to a $(4.4) million net
loss from currency exchange transactions last year.
(cid:120) The effective tax rate for fiscal year 2016 is 32.6%, as compared to the effective tax rate for fiscal year 2015 of
34.8%. This reduction in the effective tax rate contributed approximately $0.06 per diluted share for the twelve-month
period.
(cid:120) Net income for fiscal year 2016 was $88.7 million, or $2.92 per diluted share, compared to $89.1 million, or $2.95 per
diluted share, in the prior year.
Financial highlights for fiscal year 2015 included:
(cid:120) Net warehouse club sales increased 11.3% to $2.7 billion for fiscal year 2015 compared to fiscal year 2014.
(cid:120) Comparable warehouse sales (that is, sales in warehouse clubs that have been open for greater than 13 1/2 calendar
months) for the 52 weeks ended August 30, 2015 grew 2.7%.
(cid:120) Membership income for fiscal year 2015 was $43.7 million, an increase of 14.7% compared to fiscal year 2014. The
number of membership accounts at year end was 1.5 million versus $1.2 million at the end of fiscal year 2014.
(cid:120) Gross profits (net warehouse sales less associated cost of goods sold) increased 11.0%. Gross profits as a percent of net
(cid:120)
warehouse sales were 14.7% for the full year, a decrease of 4 basis points (0.04%) from fiscal year 2014.
Selling, general and administrative expenses (not including pre-opening expenses and loss on the disposal of assets) as
a percentage of net warehouse club sales was 10.9%, an increase of 20 basis points (0.20%) compared to fiscal year
2014.
(cid:120) Operating income for fiscal year 2015 was $146.4 million, an increase of 7.1% from the prior year.
(cid:120)
Foreign exchange transactions resulted in a net loss of $(4.4) million for the fiscal year 2015 compared to a net gain in
fiscal year 2014 of $984,000.
(cid:120) Net income for fiscal year 2015 was $89.1 million, or $2.95 per diluted share, compared to $92.9 million, or $3.07 per
diluted share, in the prior year.
Comparison of Fiscal Year 2016 to 2015 and Fiscal Year 2015 to 2014
The following discussion and analysis compares the results of operations for each of the three fiscal years ended
August 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014 and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the
accompanying notes included elsewhere in this report. Unless otherwise noted, all tables present U.S. dollar amounts in
thousands. Certain percentages presented are calculated using actual results prior to rounding.
8
Net Warehouse Club Sales
The following tables indicate the net warehouse club sales in the reportable segments in which we operate, and the
percentage growth in net warehouse club sales by segment during fiscal years 2016, 2015 and 2014.
Years Ended
August 31, 2016
August 31, 2015
Amount
$ 1,726,762
828,106
265,872
$ 2,820,740
% of net
sales
61.2 % $
29.4 %
9.4 %
100.0 % $
Increase/
(decrease)
from
prior year
Change
Amount
130,859
18,826
(50,077)
99,608
8.2 % $ 1,595,903
809,280
2.3 %
315,949
(15.8) %
3.7 % $ 2,721,132
% of net
sales
58.6 %
29.7 %
11.6 %
100.0 %
Years Ended
August 31, 2015
August 31, 2014
Amount
$ 1,595,903
809,280
315,949
$ 2,721,132
% of net
sales
58.6 % $
29.7 %
11.6 %
100.0 % $
Increase/
(decrease)
from
prior year
Change
Amount
118,902
35,295
122,621
276,818
8.1 % $ 1,477,001
773,985
4.6 %
63.4 %
193,328
11.3 % $ 2,444,314
% of net
sales
60.4 %
31.7 %
7.9 %
100.0 %
Central America
Caribbean
Colombia
Net warehouse club sales
Central America
Caribbean
Colombia
Net warehouse club sales
Comparison of 2016 and 2015
Net warehouse sales growth resulted from a 6.2% increase in transactions and a 2.4% decrease in the average sale.
Net warehouse sales growth in Central America was positively impacted by the openings of two new warehouse clubs,
one in Panama (June 2015) and one in Nicaragua (November 2015). All other Central American countries without additional
warehouse clubs also recorded positive sales growth in fiscal year 2016 compared to fiscal year 2015.
The Caribbean segment had no new warehouse clubs opened in the comparable periods and recorded a 2.3% increase in
net warehouse sales. A significant increase in the number of products subject to Value Added Taxes starting in February in Trinidad
and currency devaluations in both Trinidad and the Dominican Republic (the Company’s two largest markets in the Caribbean
segment) resulted in a negative sales growth in the second half of the fiscal year compared to the same period last year.
Net warehouse sales in Colombia were significantly impacted during the fiscal year by the devaluation of the Colombian
peso relative to the U.S. dollar. The strength of the U.S. dollar causes the price of imported merchandise to increase in Colombian
pesos, which reduces sales volumes of those products. In addition, net warehouse sales made in Colombian pesos when translated
yielded 26% fewer U.S. dollars in the fiscal year compared to the year ago period. Net warehouse sales in local currency (COP)
for fiscal year 2016 grew 6.0%, reflecting the addition of three new warehouse clubs for the first quarter of fiscal year 2016
compared to the first quarter of fiscal year 2015, and a stabilizing currency exchange rate in the fourth fiscal quarter.
Comparison of 2015 to 2014
During the first quarter of fiscal year 2015, we opened three additional warehouse clubs in Colombia (Bogota, Pereira
and Medellin) bringing the total warehouse clubs in Colombia to six, which increased sales in the Colombia segment. The effect
of the devaluation of the Colombian peso on U.S. dollar warehouse sales in that segment was significant. For the fiscal year, net
warehouse sales in local currency in Colombia grew 106% but net warehouse sales when converted to U.S. dollars increased only
63.4%. We opened an additional warehouse club within our Central America Segment in La Chorrera ("Costa Verde"), west of
Panama City, Panama, which is our fifth PriceSmart warehouse club in Panama, and fiscal year 2015 saw the full year effect of
the warehouse club we opened in Tegucigalpa, Honduras in May 2014. The Caribbean segment had no new warehouse clubs in
9
the comparable periods. Currency devaluations in the Dominican Republic and Jamaica impacted U.S. dollar denominated sales
growth. Trinidad and Aruba experienced the strongest sales growth in that segment.
Comparable Sales
We report comparable warehouse club sales on a “same week” basis with 13 weeks in each quarter beginning on a
Monday and ending on a Sunday. The periods are established at the beginning of the fiscal year to provide as close a match as
possible to the calendar month and quarter that is used for financial reporting purposes. This approach equalizes the number of
weekend days and weekdays in each period for improved sales comparison, as we experience higher warehouse club sales on the
weekends. Approximately every five years, the Company uses a 53-week year and a six-week “August” to account for the fact
that 52 weeks is only 364 days. For fiscal year 2016, we used a 53-week year and a six-week “August”. Further, each of the
warehouse clubs used in the calculations was open for at least 13 1/2 calendar months before its results for the current period
were compared with its results for the prior period. For example, the sales related to the warehouse club opened in Bogota,
Colombia on October 29, 2014 were not used in the calculation of comparable sales until January 2016. Sales related to the
warehouse clubs opened in Pereira and Medellin, Colombia on November 13, 2014 and November 26, 2014, respectively, were
not used in the calculation of comparable sales until January and February 2016, respectively. Sales related to the warehouse
club opened in Panama (“Costa Verde”) in June 2015 and the warehouse club opened in Nicaragua opened in November 2015
will not be used in the calculation of comparable sales until September 2016 and January 2017, respectively. Sales related to the
warehouse club opened in Colombia in September 2016 will not be used in the calculation of comparable sales until November
2017.
As part of the expansion of our e-commerce program, we began direct home delivery of products not carried in our
warehouse clubs to members in Colombia in August 2015. For e-commerce sales, revenue is recognized upon pickup of the
merchandise by the member or when the common carrier takes possession of the merchandise. Currently these e-commerce sales
of products not carried in our warehouse clubs and shipped directly to our members are being excluded from our comparable
sales. Sales related to these e-commerce sales in Colombia will not be used in the calculation of comparable sales until
October 2016. E-commerce sales of products where the product is sourced from one of our warehouse clubs and delivered to the
members home and sales of products that are not carried in our clubs, but are delivered to clubs and picked up by our members,
are reflected in the comparable sales for the warehouse club from which the inventory was sourced or picked up.
Comparison of 2016 to 2015
Comparable warehouse club sales for those warehouse clubs that were open for at least 13 ½ months for some or all of
the 53 week period ending September 4, 2016 decreased 0.8%, compared to the same 53-week period last year. Comparable
warehouse sales were negatively impacted by the devaluation of the Colombian peso from the year ago period. Six warehouse
clubs in Colombia are included in the calculation of comparable warehouse sales. Excluding those warehouse clubs, the 53-week
comparable warehouse sales for the other 30 warehouse clubs open for at least 13 ½ months increased 1.7%. We opened a new
warehouse club west of Panama City, Panama in June 2015 and one in Managua, Nicaragua in November 2015. These new
warehouse clubs are not far from existing warehouse clubs which are included in the calculation for comparable warehouse club
sales. In both cases they are attracting new members from areas not previously served by us. However, they are also creating
the opportunity for some existing members, particularly those who now find the new clubs closer to their homes, to shop at the
new locations. This transfer of sales from an existing warehouse clubs that are included in the calculation of comparable
warehouse club sales to new warehouse clubs that are not included in the calculation has an adverse impact on comparable
warehouse club sales.
Comparison of 2015 to 2014
Comparable warehouse club sales increased 2.7% for the 52-week period ended August 31, 2015, compared to the same
52-week period in the prior year. We opened a new warehouse club in Tegucigalpa, Honduras in May 2014 and another one in
Panama in June 2015. These new warehouse clubs are attracting new members from areas not previously served by us. However,
they are also creating the opportunity for some existing members, particularly those who shopped at our first Tegucigalpa,
Honduras warehouse club and certain members who shopped in our Panama City locations, to shop at the new locations. These
transfers of sales from existing warehouse clubs that are included in the calculation of comparable warehouse club sales, to new
warehouse clubs that are not included in the calculation, have an adverse impact on comparable warehouse club sales. We have
estimated the impact of this effect on reported comparable warehouse club sales in the past by excluding certain warehouse clubs
from the calculation. However, as the number of clubs affected by these openings, particularly those in Panama City, has
increased, we believe that calculation is becoming less meaningful. As a result, we have not made a specific determination of
what the 52-week comparable warehouse club sales would have been had we not opened these new warehouse clubs. In addition,
we believe that there has been some impact to our first three warehouse clubs in Colombia from the opening of the three new
10
clubs in Colombia, particularly Bogota. However, given the far more significant impact of the currency devaluation on U.S. dollar
reported sales in Colombia, it would be difficult to accurately determine the effect of the transfer of sales from the existing
warehouse clubs to the new clubs.
Net Warehouse Club Sales by Category
The following table indicates the approximate percentage of net sales accounted for by each major category of items
sold us during the fiscal years ended August 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014.
Sundries (including health and beauty aids, tobacco, alcoholic beverages,
soft drinks, cleaning and paper products and pet supplies)
Food (including candy, snack foods, dry and fresh foods)
Hardlines (including major appliances, small appliances, electronics,
hardware, office supplies, garden and patio, sporting goods, business
machines and automotive supplies)
Softlines (including apparel, domestics, cameras, jewelry, housewares,
media, toys and home furnishings)
Other (including food court)
Comparison of 2016 to 2015
Years Ended August 31,
2015
2014
2016
27 %
53 %
26 %
54 %
26 %
53 %
11 %
12 %
12 %
7 %
2 %
100 %
6 %
2 %
100 %
7 %
2 %
100 %
There was a slight shift in the mix of major category sales between fiscal year 2016 and 2015, with a slight decrease in
food and hardlines compared to the other categories. These categories were impacted more by price compression and the effect
of devaluation in Colombia than the other merchandise categories.
Export Sales
Export sales
Export sales
Years Ended
August 31, 2016
August 31, 2015
Amount
$
33,813
% of net
sales
Increase
from
prior year
Change
Amount
% of net
sales
1.2 % $
534
1.6 % $
33,279
1.2 %
Years Ended
August 31, 2015
August 31, 2014
Amount
$
33,279
% of net
sales
Increase
from
prior year
Change
Amount
% of net
sales
1.2 % $
2,000
6.4 % $
31,279
1.3 %
The increases in export sales in both years were due to increased direct sales to a single institutional customer (retailer)
in the Philippines for which PriceSmart earns an approximately 5% margin.
11
Membership Income
Membership income
Membership income % to net warehouse club sales
Number of total accounts
Membership income
Membership income % to net warehouse club sales
Number of total accounts
Comparison of 2016 to 2015
Years Ended
August 31,
2016
Increase
from
prior year
% Change
$
2,108
4.8 % $
Amount
45,781
$
1.6 %
August 31,
2015
Amount
43,673
1.6 %
1,490,424
4,239
0.3 %
1,486,185
Years Ended
August 31,
2015
Increase
from
prior year
% Change
$
5,610
14.7 % $
Amount
43,673
$
1.6 %
August 31,
2014
Amount
38,063
1.6 %
1,486,185
303,830
25.7 %
1,182,355
Membership income is recognized ratably over the one-year life of the membership. The increase in membership income
primarily reflects a growth in membership accounts for which income is recognized during the last twelve months. The average
number of member accounts during the fiscal year was 7.6% higher than the year before. The income recognized per average
member account decreased 0.3%, which primarily reflects the effect of the impact of devaluation in Colombia on the translation
of membership fees in local currency to U.S. dollars. In Colombia, the membership is priced in Colombian pesos (COP) and we
have not raised the fee to offset the devaluation impact. At the August exchange rate, a membership in Colombia yielded
approximately $19.00 compared to approximately $35.00 in most other countries. We ended the fiscal year with a renewal rate
of 80% for the twelve-month period ended August 31, 2016.
During fiscal year 2016, the Company experienced a net growth in membership accounts of 4,239 accounts, or 0.3%.
Colombia’s membership accounts during the fiscal year declined 57,522, while the other countries grew by 61,761 accounts. The
decrease in overall accounts in Colombia was due to the first anniversary date for a large number of accounts associated with the
three warehouse clubs in Colombia that opened in October and November of 2015 and the low renewal rate for those accounts.
The opening of these three warehouse clubs in fiscal year 2015 resulted in approximately 124,000 expiring accounts in October,
November and December from the record number of new member sign-ups experienced at the opening of these clubs. As
expected, we experienced a low renewal rate for those expiring accounts due to a historically low renewal rate for first year
members across our markets, the distance of our warehouse clubs in Bogota and Medellin to where certain members live, and the
impact of price increases on imported products due to the Colombian peso devaluation. While we continue to see new member
sign-ups in Colombia, and an improving renewal rate of current members in Colombia, the twelve-month renewal rate is impacted
by those non-renewals earlier in the fiscal year. The Company’s twelve-month renewal rate for the period ended August 31,
2016 declined to 80% from 86% for the twelve months ended August 31, 2015. Excluding Colombia, the twelve-month renewal
rate was 87% as of August 31, 2016, consistent with 87% in August 2015, November 2015, and February 2016.
Comparison of 2015 to 2014
Membership income is recognized ratably over the one-year life of the membership. The increase in membership income
primarily reflects a growth in membership accounts during the last twelve months. The average number of member accounts
during the fiscal year increased 19.4% compared to last year. The opening of the new warehouse clubs in Colombia accounted
for over 71% of the total increase in member accounts from a year ago. We continue to experience membership growth in the
three new Colombia warehouse clubs since they opened in October and November 2014. Similarly, we have experienced
membership growth in Panama as a result of the additional warehouse club opened in that country. The income recognized per
average member account decreased 3.9%, which reflects the effect of the impact of devaluation in Colombia on the translation
of membership fees in local currency to U.S. dollars. In Colombia, the membership is priced in Colombian pesos (COP) and we
have not raised the fee to offset the devaluation impact. At the August exchange rate, a membership in Colombia yielded
12
approximately $20.00 compared to approximately $35.00 in most other countries. We ended the fiscal year with a renewal rate
of 86% for the twelve-month period ended August 31, 2015.
Other Income
Other income
Amount
4,842
$
prior year % Change
$
323
7.1 % $
Amount
4,519
Years Ended
August 31,
2016
Increase
from
August 31,
2015
Years Ended
August 31,
2015
Increase
from
prior year
% Change
$
608
15.5 % $
August 31,
2014
Amount
3,911
Amount
4,519
$
Other income
Comparison of 2016 to 2015
For the twelve-month period, the period-over-period increase was attributable to $426,000 in insurance gains associated
with insured business losses during fiscal year.
Comparison of 2015 to 2014
The increase in Other income for fiscal year 2015 compared to fiscal year 2014 resulted primarily from growth in rental
income.
Gross Margin
Warehouse Gross Profit Margin
Warehouse club sales
Less associated cost of goods
Warehouse gross profit margin
Warehouse club sales
Less associated cost of goods
Warehouse gross profit margin
Years Ended
August 31, 2016
Increase/
(decrease)
from
prior year
August 31, 2015
Amount
% to sales
% to sales
99,608
96,292
3,316
100.0 % $ 2,721,132
2,321,074
85.7 %
400,058
14.3 % $
100.0 %
85.3 %
14.7 %
Years Ended
August 31, 2014
August 31, 2015
Increase/
(decrease)
from
prior year
% to sales Amount
% to sales
276,818
237,141
39,677
100.0 % $ 2,444,314
2,083,933
85.3 %
360,381
14.7 % $
100.0 %
85.3 %
14.7 %
Amount
$ 2,820,740 $
2,417,366
$
403,374 $
Amount
$ 2,721,132 $
2,321,074
$
400,058 $
13
Comparison of 2016 to 2015
For the twelve months ended August 31, 2016, warehouse gross profit margin as a percent of sales was 40 basis points
(0.40%) lower than the twelve months ended August 31, 2015. Warehouse gross profit margin as a percent of sales decreased
149 basis points (1.49%) in Colombia from the year ago period largely as a result of pricing actions we took during the year to
provide value on imported goods to our members. Warehouse gross profit margins as a percent of sales in the non-Colombia
markets were in aggregate 39 basis points (0.39%) lower resulting from a higher level of markdowns, reduced endcap activity
and higher per unit distribution costs.
Comparison of 2015 to 2014
For the twelve months ended August 31, 2015, warehouse gross profit margin as a percent of sales was four basis points
(0.04%) lower than the twelve months ended August 31, 2014. In the first fiscal quarter we benefited from lower costs as a percent
of sales in a number of areas, including lower merchandise distribution costs and reduced shrink. Vendor rebates and a higher
level of product demonstration activity also contributed to the higher gross margin in the current period compared to the year
earlier period. This was partially offset in the second and third fiscal quarters with lower margins in Colombia. In the fourth
quarter of fiscal year 2015, warehouse gross profit margins were 14.8% of net warehouse sales, a decrease of 46 basis points
(0.46%) from the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2014. We continue to operate with lower merchandise margins in Colombia which
impacts the consolidated results. In the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2015, merchandise margins in Colombia were 282 basis points
(2.82%) lower, compared to the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2014. For the full fiscal year 2015, merchandise margins in Colombia
decreased 211 basis points (2.11%) from fiscal year 2014. Fiscal year 2015 margins excluding Colombia increased 30 basis points
(0.30%) from fiscal year 2014.
Export Sales Gross Profit Margin
Years Ended
August 31, 2016
August 31, 2015
Export sales
Less associated cost of goods sold
Export sales gross profit margin
Amount
$
33,813 $
32,260
$
1,553 $
Increase/
(decrease)
from
prior year
% to sales Amount
% to sales
534
495
39
100.0 % $
95.4 %
4.6 % $
33,279
31,765
1,514
100.0 %
95.5 %
4.5 %
Years Ended
August 31, 2014
August 31, 2015
Increase/
(decrease)
from
prior year
Amount
$
33,279 $
31,765
$
1,514 $
% to sales Amount
2,000
2,034
(34)
100.0 % $
95.5 %
4.5 % $
% to sales
100.0 %
95.1 %
4.9 %
31,279
29,731
1,548
Export sales
Less associated cost of goods sold
Export sales gross profit margin
Comparison of 2016 to 2015 and 2015 to 2014
The increase in fiscal year 2016 and fiscal year 2015 in export sales gross margin dollars compared to the prior year
period(s) was in line with the growth in direct sales to an institutional customer (retailer) in the Philippines for which we generally
earn lower margins than those obtained through our warehouse club sales.
14
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Warehouse Club Operations
Warehouse club operations expense
Amount
$
252,130
Warehouse club operations expense
Amount
$
241,285
Comparison of 2016 to 2015
Years Ended
August 31, 2015
August 31, 2016
% to
warehouse
club sales
Increase from
prior year
8.9 % $
10,845
4.5 % $
241,285
% Change Amount
% to
warehouse
club sales
8.9 %
Years Ended
August 31, 2015
August 31, 2014
% to
warehouse
club sales
Increase from
prior year
% Change Amount
8.9 % $
28,809
13.6 % $
212,476
% to
warehouse
club sales
8.7 %
The Company incurred the expenses associated with five new warehouse clubs for all or a portion of fiscal year 2016
compared to fiscal year 2015. The combination of lower first year sales and resulting higher expense ratio for new warehouse
clubs compared to more mature clubs, and the cannibalization of sales from an existing nearby club without the proportionate
decrease in expenses, resulted in an overall 7 basis point (0.07%) increase in warehouse operations expense as a percent of net
warehouse sales.
Comparison of 2015 to 2014
Warehouse club operations expense as a percent of net warehouse sales for the twelve months of fiscal year 2015
increased 18 basis points (0.18%) compared to the same period in fiscal 2014. The opening of the three new clubs in Colombia
during the year, combined with the higher operating costs in Colombia (including the “Equity Tax” of $850,000 recognized in
the second fiscal quarter), was the primary contributor to the increase as a percent of net warehouse sales. Lower utility costs and
other operating expense leverage resulted in a nine basis point (0.09%) reduction in warehouse club expense as a percent of net
warehouse sales excluding Colombia.
General and Administrative Expenses
Years Ended
August 31, 2016
August 31, 2015
General and administrative expenses $
64,344
2.3 % $
7,973
14.1 % $
56,371
Amount
% to
warehouse
club sales
Increase
from
prior year
% Change Amount
% to
warehouse
club sales
2.1 %
Years Ended
August 31, 2015
% to
warehouse
club sales
Increase
from
prior year
Amount
% Change Amount
August 31, 2014
% to
warehouse
club sales
2.0 %
General and administrative expenses $
56,371
2.1 % $
6,427
12.9 % $
49,944
15
Comparison of 2016 to 2015
For the twelve-month period, general and administrative expenses grew 14.1%, resulting from additional staffing to
support the Company’s growth, most notably in the buying and information technology “IT” areas, and increased deferred
compensation expense associated with stock awards granted in the first quarter, totaling approximately $3.0 million.
Comparison of 2015 to 2014
The expenses associated with our corporate and U.S. buying operations grew 12.9% during the fiscal year, compared to
last year. Spending on IT initiatives and professional fees associated with increased compliance activities contributed to the
increase during the year, as did additional staffing needs within our U.S. Buying Department (personnel involved in contracting
and coordination of merchandise purchasing) and our IT departments, to support the growth of the Company.
Pre-Opening Expenses
Expenses incurred before a warehouse club is in operation are captured in pre-opening expenses.
Years Ended
August 31,
2016
(Decrease)
from
prior year
Amount
August 31,
2015
% Change
Amount
Pre-opening expenses
$
1,191 $
(2,546)
(68.1) % $
3,737
Years Ended
August 31,
2015
Increase
from
prior year
Amount
August 31,
2014
% Change
Amount
Pre-opening expenses
$
3,737 $
406
12.2 % $
3,331
Comparison of 2016 to 2015
During the first and second quarters of fiscal year 2016, pre-opening expenses were related to the warehouse club opened
in Managua, Nicaragua during November 2015, and during the third and fourth quarters, pre-opening expenses incurred were
related to the new warehouse club opened in Chia, Colombia on September 1, 2016.
Comparison of 2015 to 2014
The pre-opening expenses for fiscal year 2015 were for the three Colombia warehouse clubs (Bogota, Pereira and
Medellin) and the Panama warehouse club. We opened the Bogota location in October 2014 and opened the other two Colombian
sites in November 2014. Additionally, we opened the Panama, Costa Verde, warehouse club during the fourth quarter of the fiscal
year.
16
Loss/(Gain) on Disposal of Assets
Asset disposal activity consisted mainly of normally scheduled asset replacement and upgrades.
Years Ended
August 31,
2016
(Decrease)
from
prior year
Amount
August 31,
2015
% Change
Amount
Loss/(gain) on disposal of assets
$
1,162 $
(843)
(42.0) % $
2,005
Years Ended
August 31,
2016
Increase
from
prior year
Amount
August 31,
2015
% Change
Amount
Loss/(gain) on disposal of assets
$
2,005 $
560
38.8 % $
1,445
Operating Income
Operating income
Operating income
Comparison of 2016 to 2015
Years Ended
August 31, 2016
August 31, 2015
Amount
$
136,723
% to
warehouse
club sales
(Decrease)
from
prior year % Change
Amount
4.8 % $
(9,643)
(6.6) % $
146,366
% to
warehouse
club sales
5.4 %
Years Ended
August 31, 2015
August 31, 2014
Amount
$
146,366
% to
warehouse
club sales
Increase
from
prior year % Change Amount
5.4 % $
9,659
7.1 % $
136,707
% to
warehouse
club sales
5.6 %
For the twelve-months ended August 31, 2016, operating income decreased $9.6 million compared to the prior year
period. A 15.9% decrease in net warehouse sales and lower merchandise margins increased the operating loss in Colombia by
$3.5 million; and lower merchandise margins and higher operating expenses (including G&A) offset the increased sales in the
non-Colombia countries and resulting in a reduced operating profit of $6.1 million compared to fiscal year 2015.
Comparison of 2015 to 2014
Operating income increased by $9.7 million compared to the prior year, resulting from higher sales and membership
income. As a percentage of sales, operating income decreased 21 basis points (0.21%), primarily due to reduced merchandise
margins and higher operating expenses in Colombia compared to the rest of the Company.
17
Interest Expense
Interest expense on loans
Interest expense related to hedging activity
Capitalized interest
Net interest expense
Interest expense on loans
Interest expense related to hedging activity
Capitalized interest
Net interest expense
Years Ended
August 31,
2016
August 31,
2015
Increase/
(decrease)
from prior
year
187 $
(709)
(27)
(549) $
Amount
4,804
2,691
(1,055)
6,440
Amount
$
$
4,991 $
1,982
(1,082)
5,891 $
Years Ended
August 31,
2015
August 31,
2014
Increase/
(decrease)
from prior
year
659 $
1,059
427
2,145 $
Amount
4,145
1,632
(1,482)
4,295
Amount
$
$
4,804 $
2,691
(1,055)
6,440 $
Interest expense reflects borrowings by our wholly owned foreign subsidiaries to finance new warehouse club
construction and land acquisition, the capital requirements of warehouse club operations and ongoing working capital
requirements and interest expense related to hedging activities.
Comparison of 2016 to 2015
Net interest expense for the twelve-months ended August 31, 2016 decreased from a year ago due to a decrease in interest
expense from hedging activity. This was primarily related to the decrease in the volatility in interest rates for the interest rates
related to the hedged loans. This decrease was partially offset by an increase in interest expense related the net increase of new
loans for approximately $11.6 million year-on year.
Comparison of 2015 to 2014
Net interest expense for the fiscal year 2015 increased from a year ago, with an increase in interest expense on loans and
on interest expenses related to hedging activity and a decrease in the amount of capitalized interest compared with the same
period in the prior year. These changes were mainly due to the net increases in loans outstanding, hedging activities related to
new loan activity to support the increase in construction activities related to the three new warehouse clubs in Colombia, and a
new warehouse club in Panama and Nicaragua.
18
Other Income (Expense), net
Other income consists of currency gain or loss.
Years Ended
August 31,
2016
Increase
from
prior year
Amount
August 31,
2015
%Change
Amount
Other income (expense), net
$
(899) $
3,489
(79.5) % $
(4,388)
Years Ended
August 31,
2015
(Decrease)
from
prior year
Amount
August 31,
2014
%Change
Amount
Other income (expense), net
$
(4,388) $
(5,372)
(545.9) % $
984
Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of the respective entity
(primarily U.S. dollars) are revalued to the functional currency using the exchange rate on the balance sheet date. These foreign
exchange transaction gain (losses), including repatriation of funds, are recorded as currency gain or losses.
Comparison of 2016 to 2015
For the twelve-month period, the improvement from the prior year is mostly related to Colombia where we have taken
a number of actions to mitigate any large exposures to the Colombian peso, including increased capitalization of the Colombian
subsidiary, which allows for timely payments for merchandise and fixed assets shipped to Colombia. We have experienced
increased volatility of currencies within our other markets that have largely offset each other.
Comparison of 2015 to 2014
For the twelve months ended August 31, 2015, we recorded a net currency loss of $4.4 million resulting from activity
associated with monetary assets and liabilities and the associated non-deliverable forwards that were in place to manage the
impact of currency fluctuations, $4.1 million of which related to Colombia during the first two quarters of the fiscal year. The
impact of the 29% devaluation of the Colombian peso during that six-month period had a material impact on our consolidated
results due to the high level of U.S. dollar denominated inter-company liabilities held by our Colombian subsidiary. These U.S.
dollar denominated inter-company liabilities were greater than normal because of the impact of the subsidiary’s initial acquisition
of merchandise to stock the three new warehouse clubs opened in October and November 2014 and the investment in fixed assets
for these same warehouse clubs. As the Colombian peso continued to devalue throughout the period, settlements of these
liabilities resulted in realized currency losses. Any remaining liabilities at the end of the period were subject to revaluation at a
higher exchange rate relative to the U.S. dollar. While a portion of this exposure was covered by non-deliverable forward
contracts, there was a net negative impact to income related to the devaluation in Colombia in the first two quarters of the fiscal
year. Other subsidiaries that had greater U.S. dollar denominated cash and cash equivalents (including restricted cash) than their
U.S. dollar denominated liabilities did not experience similar depreciation in their markets and therefore did not counterbalance
the impact of the depreciation in Colombia.
19
Provision for Income Taxes
Current tax expense
Net deferred tax provision (benefit)
Provision for income taxes
Effective tax rate
Current tax expense
Net deferred tax provision (benefit)
Provision for income taxes
Effective tax rate
Comparison of 2016 to 2015
Years Ended
August 31,
2016
August 31,
2015
Increase/
(decrease)
from
prior year
(4,620) $
(97)
(4,717) $
Amount
44,594
2,972
47,566
34.8 %
Amount
39,974
2,875
42,849
$
$
$
$
32.6 %
Years Ended
August 31,
2015
August 31,
2014
Increase/
(decrease)
from
prior year
3,553 $
2,641
6,194 $
Amount
41,041
331
41,372
30.8 %
Amount
44,594
2,972
47,566
$
$
$
$
34.8 %
For fiscal year 2016, the effective tax rate was 32.6%. The decrease in the effective rate versus the prior year was
primarily attributable to an intercompany transaction between PriceSmart, Inc. and our Colombian subsidiary in support of
PriceSmart’s ongoing market development and growth in Colombia. This intercompany transaction resulted in a favorable impact
on the effective tax rate of 3% due to reductions to taxable income in the U.S. and a resulting increase in taxable income in our
Colombia subsidiary. This income did not generate income tax expense in Colombia, because the additional taxable income in
Colombia was fully offset by the reversal of valuation allowances on accumulated net losses in that subsidiary. We expect a
similar favorable impact to the consolidated Company’s effective tax rate over the next several quarters. Additionally, in
comparison to the prior year, there was an offsetting unfavorable impact of 1.5% due to the establishment of a valuation allowance
against the deferred tax assets of the Company’s Barbados subsidiary. While the Company’s forecasts indicate profitability for
the immediate and foreseeable future, the existence of negative objective evidence from recent years established the need for a
valuation allowance of approximately $2.0 million in order to reduce deferred tax assets to amounts expected to be realized.
Comparison of 2015 to 2014
The variance in the effective tax rate for the twelve-month period ended August 31, 2015 compared to the prior year
was primarily attributable to the unfavorable impact of 3.4% resulting from an increased taxable loss incurred in the Company’s
Colombia subsidiary for which no tax benefit was recognized, net of adjustment to valuation allowance, and the non-recurrence
of a favorable impact of 0.4% in the prior period from the tax effect of changes in foreign currency value.
20
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Summary of Changes in Other Comprehensive Income (loss)
Years Ended
August 31,
2016
(Decrease)
from
Amount
prior year % Change Amount
August 31,
2015
(Decrease)
from
prior year
August 31,
2014
% Change Amount
Foreign currency
translation adjustments
Defined benefit pension
plan
Derivative Instruments
Total
$ (102,245) $
(1,705)
1.7 % $ (100,540) $
(50,130)
99.4 % $
(50,410)
(315)
(1,391)
$ (103,951) $
(202)
(532)
(2,439)
178.8 %
61.9 %
(113)
(859)
2.4 % $ (101,512) $
(226)
(1,870)
(52,226)
(100.0) %
(85.0) %
(85.5) % $
113
1,011
(49,286)
Comparison of 2016 to 2015
Other comprehensive income/(loss) for fiscal years 2016 and 2015 resulted primarily from foreign currency translation
adjustments related to the assets and liabilities and the translation of the statement of income related to revenue, costs and
expenses of our subsidiaries whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar. When the functional currency in our international
subsidiaries is the local currency and not U.S. dollars, the assets and liabilities of such subsidiaries are translated to U.S. dollars
at the exchange rate on the balance sheet date, and revenue, costs and expenses are translated at average rates of exchange in
effect during the period. The corresponding translation gains and losses are recorded as a component of accumulated other
comprehensive income or loss. These adjustments will not affect net income until the sale or liquidation of the underlying
investment. The reported other comprehensive income or loss reflects the unrealized increase or decrease in the value in U.S.
dollars of the net assets of the subsidiaries as of the date of the balance sheet, which will vary from period to period as exchange
rates fluctuate. During the periods reported, the largest translation adjustments were related to the translation of the Colombia
subsidiary's balance sheet and statement of income.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Financial Position and Cash Flow
We require cash to fund our operating expenses and working capital requirements, including the investment in
merchandise inventories, acquisition of land and construction of new warehouse clubs and distribution centers, expansion of
existing warehouse clubs and distribution centers, acquisitions of fixtures and equipment, routine upgrades and maintenance of
fixtures and equipment within existing warehouse clubs, investments in joint ventures in Panama and Costa Rica to own and
operate commercial retail centers located adjacent to the new warehouse clubs, the purchase of treasury stock upon the vesting
of restricted stock awards and payment of dividends to stockholders. Our primary sources for funding these requirements are
cash and cash equivalents on hand, cash generated from operations and bank borrowings. We evaluate on a regular basis whether
we may need to borrow additional funds to cover any shortfall in our ability to generate sufficient cash from operations to meet
our operating and capital requirements. As such, we may enter into or obtain additional loans and/or credit facilities to provide
additional liquidity when necessary.
The following table summarizes the cash and cash equivalents held by our foreign subsidiaries and domestically (in
thousands). Repatriation of cash and cash equivalents held by foreign subsidiaries may require us to accrue and pay taxes. We
have no plans at this time to repatriate cash through the payment of cash dividends by our foreign subsidiaries to our domestic
operations and, therefore, have not accrued taxes that would be due from repatriation.
Cash and cash equivalents held by foreign subsidiaries
Cash and cash equivalents held domestically
Total cash and cash equivalents
August 31,
2016
160,053 $
39,469
199,522 $
August 31,
2015
124,952
32,120
157,072
$
$
From time to time we have experienced a lack of availability of U.S. dollars in certain markets (U.S. dollar illiquidity).
This impedes our ability to convert local currencies obtained through warehouse sales into U.S. dollars to settle the U.S. dollar
liabilities associated with our imported products. In the second half of fiscal year 2016 and continuing into fiscal year 2017, we
21
are experiencing this situation in Trinidad (“TT”). We are limited in our ability to convert TT dollars that we generate through
sales of merchandise into U.S. dollars which limits our ability to deploy that cash for corporate purposes. We will continue to
seek to maximize the level of tradeable currency our Trinidad subsidiary can obtain (such as Euros and Canadian dollars) from
our relationship banks. The Trinidad government is aware that having limited tradable currency poses challenges to U.S.
companies doing business in Trinidad, including PriceSmart. However, until such time that the uncertain state of tradable
currency is resolved, we plan to take steps to limit our exposure. We plan to reduce new shipments of merchandise to Trinidad
from our distribution center in Miami to levels that generally align with our Trinidad subsidiary’s ability to pay for the
merchandise in U.S. dollars. This is likely to result in our Trinidad subsidiary running out of certain merchandise, which could
negatively impact sales in Trinidad.
Our cash flows are summarized as follows (in thousands):
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
Effect of exchange rates
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
August 31,
2016
139,862 $
(78,175)
(16,460)
(2,777)
42,450 $
Years Ended
August 31,
2015
110,503 $
(89,082)
9,965
(11,412)
19,974 $
$
$
August 31,
2014
137,275
(119,559)
1,872
(4,364)
15,224
Our operating activities provided cash for all periods presented as summarized below:
$
Net income
Adjustments to reconcile net
income to net cash provided from
(used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization
(Gain) loss on sale of property and
equipment
Deferred income taxes
Stock-based compensation
expenses
Other non-cash operating
activities
Proceeds from settlement of
derivatives
Net non-cash related expenses
Net income from operating
activities reconciled for non-cash
operating activities
Changes in operating assets and
liabilities not including
merchandise inventories
Changes in merchandise
inventories
Net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities
$
$
August 31,
2016
Years Ended
August 31,
2015
August 31,
2014
88,723 $
89,124 $
92,886 $
39,794
34,445
28,475
Increase/
(Decrease)
2016 to 2015
(401) $
2015 to 2014
(3,762)
1,162
2,875
8,511
(325)
2,005
2,972
4,763
(94)
1,445
2,362
4,962
(9)
(231)
5,349
(843)
(97)
3,748
5,970
560
610
(199)
(85)
—
52,017 $
8,543
52,634 $
—
37,235 $
(8,543)
(617) $
8,543
15,399
140,740
141,758
130,121
(1,018)
11,637
14,854
9,537
16,124
5,317
(6,587)
(15,732)
(40,792)
(8,970)
25,060
(31,822)
139,862 $
110,503 $
137,275 $
29,359 $
(26,772)
Net income from operating activities reconciled for non-cash operating activities decreased approximately $1.0 million
for the twelve-months ended August 31, 2016 over the same period last year. This was primarily a result of a year on year
decrease in net income of approximately $400,000 and a year-on-year decrease in non-cash adjustments of approximately
$617,000. The decrease in non-cash adjustment was primarily the result of proceeds from settlements of derivatives recorded in
fiscal year 2015 for approximately $8.5 million, with no proceeds being recorded during fiscal year 2016. This decrease to net
non-cash related expenses was partially offset by increases in depreciation expenses for approximately $5.3 million and increases
in stock-based compensation expenses for approximately $3.7 million associated with stock awards granted in the first quarter.
22
The increase in depreciation is due to new warehouse club investments and the continued ongoing capital improvements to
existing warehouse clubs.
Net income from operating activities reconciled for non-cash operating activities increased $11.6 million in fiscal year
2015 over fiscal year 2014. This was primarily a result of a year-on-year increase in non-cash adjustments of approximately $15.4
million that included proceeds received from the settlement of derivatives of approximately $8.5 million, offset by an
approximately $3.8 million decrease in net income. The increase in non-cash adjustments was primarily driven by increases in
depreciation expense for approximately $6.0 million due to new warehouse club investment and the continued ongoing capital
improvements to existing warehouse clubs. Proceeds from the settlement of derivatives were a result of the Company’s repayment
of approximately $24.0 million in loans that were hedged. The investment in merchandise inventories net of vendor accounts
payable of $24.4 million reflects the additional merchandise associated with overall sales growth and the addition of three new
warehouse clubs in Colombia, one new warehouse club in Panama and initial merchandise inventory flowing to the new Managua,
Nicaragua warehouse club, that opened in November 2015.
Our use of cash in investing activities for the period presented is summarized below:
Land acquisitions
Deposits for land purchase option
agreements
Warehouse club expansion,
construction, and land
improvements
Acquisition of fixtures and
equipment
Proceeds from disposals of
property and equipment
Capital contribution to joint
ventures
Net cash flows used by (provided
in) investing activities
August 31,
2016
Years Ended
August 31,
2015
August 31,
2014
Increase/
(Decrease)
2016 to 2015
2015 to 2014
$
3,161 $
16,780 $
22,090 $
(13,619) $
(5,310)
442
(1,095)
850
1,537
(1,945)
33,064
45,414
53,516
(12,350)
(8,102)
41,475
26,991
42,495
14,484
(15,504)
(86)
119
(368)
1,360
(142)
750
282
(1,241)
(226)
610
$
78,175 $
89,082 $
119,559 $
(10,907) $
(30,477)
Net cash used in investing activities decreased in fiscal year 2016 compared to fiscal year 2015 by approximately $10.9
million primarily due to decreases in cash expended for the purchase of land, the decrease in expenditures for warehouse club
expansion, and a lower level of construction and land improvement activities during fiscal year 2016. These decreases were
partially offset by period-over-period increases in the acquisition of fixtures and equipment and deposits for land purchase option
agreements. During the twelve-months of fiscal year 2016, expenditures for warehouse club expansions and for fixtures and
equipment were associated with the construction of the completed warehouse club in Managua, Nicaragua that opened in
November 2015 and construction activities of a warehouse club in Chia, Colombia, during fiscal year 2016. Net cash used in
investing activities in fiscal year 2015 consisted of cash expended for the construction and completion of warehouse clubs in
Bogota, Colombia ("Salitre"), Pereira, Colombia, and Medellin, Colombia and the additions of fixtures and equipment for these
warehouse clubs. Additionally, we began construction of a warehouse club in Panama during the first nine months of fiscal year
2015. Acquisition of fixtures and equipment increased year-on-year approximately $14.4 million. This was primarily due to
the continued normal ongoing capital expenditures for the upgrade and replacement of equipment and building and leasehold
improvements.
Net cash used in investing activities decreased in fiscal year 2015 compared to fiscal year 2014 by approximately $30.5
million primarily due to a decrease in cash expended for the purchases of fixtures and equipment, warehouse club construction
and purchases of land compared to fiscal year 2014. During fiscal year 2014, we purchased land and began the construction of
warehouse clubs in Pereira, Colombia and in the city of Medellin, Colombia. Also during fiscal year 2014, we leased land in
Bogota, Colombia for which we also began construction of a warehouse club on that site. During fiscal year 2015, we acquired
one new site in Panama City, Panama ("La Chorrera", Costa Verde). Construction for the Colombia and Panama warehouses was
completed during fiscal year 2015. During fiscal year 2015, we purchased land in Managua, Nicaragua where we began
construction of the warehouse club that opened in November 2015. In fiscal year 2015 we also acquired beneficial rights to land
in the municipality of Chia, Colombia. Additionally, during fiscal year 2015, we released approximately $1.1 million in restricted
cash related to the beneficial rights acquired to the land in the municipality of Chia, and the release of restricted cash related to a
land purchase option in Guatemala that expired. We also increased during the fiscal year 2015 our investment in real estate joint
ventures located in Panama and Costa Rica by approximately $1.4 million.
23
We have either commitments or plans for capital spending during fiscal year 2017 for warehouse club construction of
approximately $1.5 million relating to warehouse club expansions. We expect to spend approximately $130.0 million in other
capital expenditures for ongoing replacement of equipment and building/leasehold improvements during fiscal year 2017. Future
capital expenditures will be dependent on the timing of future land purchases and/or warehouse club construction activity.
We have entered into land purchase option agreements within our subsidiaries that have not been recorded as a
commitments, for which we have recorded within the balance sheet deposits of approximately $642,000. These land purchase
option agreements can be canceled at the sole option of the Company, with the Company forfeiting the deposits. We do not have
a timetable of when or if we will exercise these land purchase options, due to the uncertainty related to the completion of our due
diligence reviews. Our due diligence reviews include evaluations of the legal status of the property, the zoning and permitting
issues related to acquiring approval for the construction and operation of a warehouse club and any other issues related to the
property itself that could render the property unsuitable or limit the property's economic viability as a warehouse club site. If all
of these purchase option agreements are exercised, the cash use would be approximately $16.9 million.
In March 2016, the Company entered into a contract, subject to customary contingencies, to acquire a distribution center
in Medley, Miami-Dade County, Florida, to which it will transfer the majority of its current Miami distribution center activities
once the construction of the building is complete and the building is ready for occupancy. The Company currently expects
completion to be in first half of calendar year 2017. The total purchase price is approximately $46.0 million. The Company
deposited into escrow $300,000 of cash and approximately $8.8 million through an irrevocable and unconditional standby letter
of credit payable to the seller. This letter of credit also contains an automatic one year renewal and entitles the seller to draw upon
this letter of credit fully or partially on demand to the Company if the seller, per the underlying purchase contract, is entitled to
draw down upon the letter of credit under prescribed conditions.
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities for the period presented is summarized below:
August 31,
2016
Years Ended
August 31,
2015
August 31,
2014
Increase/
(Decrease)
2016 to 2015
2015 to 2014
New bank loans offset by
establishment of certificates of
deposit held against loans and
payments on existing bank loans
(loan activities)
New short-term bank loans, offset
by payments
Cash dividend payments
Proceeds from exercise of stock
options and the tax benefit related
to stock options
Purchase of treasury stock related
to vesting of restricted stock
Net cash (used) in/provided by
financing activities
$
(2,155) $
24,992 $
26,186 $
(27,147) $
(1,194)
9,613
(21,274)
9,521
(21,126)
(4)
(21,144)
92
(148)
9,525
18
690
1,255
1,607
(565)
(3,334)
(4,677)
(4,773)
1,343
(352)
96
$
(16,460) $
9,965 $
1,872 $
(26,425) $
8,093
Net cash provided by long term and short term loan activities decreased approximately $27.1 million in fiscal year 2016
over fiscal year 2015. We received cash during fiscal year 2016 from short-term borrowings for approximately $28.9 million and
cash from additional long-term loans entered into by our subsidies of approximately $14.4 million. This increase in cash was
offset by repayments of long-term loans of approximately $2.8 million and regularly scheduled loan payments of $13.7 million.
Additional payments for approximately $19.3 million on the short-term loans were recorded. This activity accounted for an
overall increase in cash provided by long term and short term loan activities of approximately $7.5 million.
During fiscal year 2015, we received cash from seven additional loans entered into by our Panama, Guatemala, Honduras
(three loans in Honduras), Trinidad and Colombia subsidiaries for approximately $10.0 million, $7.5 million, $16.9 million, $3.6
million and $15.0 million, respectively. Additionally, during fiscal year 2015, $2.9 million in restricted cash was released back
to us due to the repayment of one of the loans borrowed by our Honduras subsidiary and $24.0 million in restricted cash was
released back to us due to the repayment of four loans by our Colombia subsidiary. These increases were offset by repayments of
long-term loans of approximately $3.2 million and $13.3 million by our Honduras subsidiary and $3.2 million by our Trinidad
subsidiary, the payment of approximately $24.0 million in derivative obligations associated with our Colombia subsidiary loans,
and regularly scheduled loan payments of $11.2 million. Additionally we received cash from short-term borrowings for
24
approximately $51.7 million, offset by payments for approximately $42.1 million on the short-term loans were recorded. This
activity accounted for an overall increase in cash provided by loan activities of approximately $34.5 million.
For the twelve-months ended August 31, 2015, net cash provided by loan activities increased approximately $8.3
million over the same period in fiscal year 2014.
The following table summarizes the dividends declared and paid during fiscal years 2016, 2015 and 2014.
Declared
2/3/2016
2/4/2015
1/23/2014
First Payment
Record
Date
Date
Paid
Amount
Second Payment
Date
Paid
Record
Date
0.70 2/15/2016 2/29/2016 $
0.70 2/13/2015 2/27/2015 $
0.70 2/14/2014 2/28/2014 $
0.35 8/15/2016 8/31/2016 $
0.35 8/14/2015 8/31/2015 $
0.35 8/15/2014 8/29/2014 $
Amount
$
$
$
Amount
0.35
0.35
0.35
We anticipate the ongoing payment of semi-annual dividends in subsequent periods, although the actual declaration of
future dividends, the amount of such dividends, and the establishment of record and payment dates is subject to final
determination by the Board of Directors at its discretion after its review of the Company’s financial performance and anticipated
capital requirements.
Financing Activities
On May 31, 2016, the Company's Trinidad subsidiary entered into a loan agreement with First Caribbean International
Bank (“FCIB”). The agreement supplements to the outstanding loan facility agreement between the same parties. The amount
outstanding under the original loan was approximately $2.8 million as of May 31, 2016. The agreement provides for a U.S. $7.0
million loan to be repaid in 60 monthly principal payments plus interest, and balloon payment of $2.0 million due on the
repayment date. The interest rate is set at the 90 day LIBOR rate plus 2.75%. The $7.0 million loan was funded and the pre-
existing $2.8 million dollar loan was paid in full on June 8, 2016.
On September 18, 2015, the Company's Costa Rica subsidiary entered into a loan agreement with Banco BAC San Jose
S.A. The agreement establishes a credit facility for 3.955 billion Costa Rican Colones ("CRC") (approximately U.S. $7.4 million)
with a fixed interest rate of 7.5% for the first two years, and a rate of 3.0% over the rate of interest used by individual commercial
banks as a basis for their lending rates as published by the Central Bank of Costa Rica for the remainder of the term. The loan
term is for seven years with a twelve-month grace period on principal repayment. Monthly interest is due beginning with the
first month and monthly principal payments are due after the twelve-month grace period ends. The loan was funded on
September 30, 2015.
On August 28, 2015, the Company's Costa Rica subsidiary entered into a loan agreement with Citibank, N.A. (“Citi”).
The agreement provides for a U.S. $7.5 million loan to be repaid in 20 quarterly principal payments of U.S. $187,500 plus interest,
and balloon payment of U.S. $3.8 million due on August 28, 2020. The interest rate is set at the three-month LIBOR rate plus
2.50%. The loan is secured by a guarantee from PriceSmart, Inc. The U.S. $7.5 million loan was funded on August 28, 2015.
The Company entered into a cross-currency interest rate debt service swap agreement on August 31, 2015 with Citi. The Company
will receive variable U.S. dollar interest based on the three-month LIBOR rate plus 2.50% on an amortizing notional of US $7.5
million and pay fixed CRC interest of 7.65% on an amortizing notional of CRC 4,035,000,000 for a term of approximately five
years. The swap agreement stipulates quarterly net settlement of notional amounts whereby the Company receives U.S. $187,500
from Citi and in exchange the Company pays CRC 100,875,000. The Company has economically hedged the currency exposure
of the balloon payment using a non-deliverable forward contract. However, this economic hedge has not been designated as such
for accounting purposes; therefore, the change in fair value of the non-deliverable forward will be accounted for in earnings.
In August 2015, the Company’s Colombia subsidiary paid off the outstanding loan principal balance of U.S. $8.0 million
under a loan agreement entered into with Scotiabank & Trust (Cayman) Ltd. The Company’s subsidiary also settled the cross-
currency interest rate swaps that it had entered into with the Bank of Nova Scotia related to this loan.
In July 2015, the Company’s Colombia subsidiary paid off outstanding loan principal balances of U.S. $16.0 million
under loan agreements entered into with Scotiabank & Trust (Cayman) Ltd. The Company’s subsidiary also settled the cross-
currency interest rate swaps that it had entered into with the Bank of Nova Scotia related to these loans.
In March 2015, the Company’s Honduras subsidiary paid off the outstanding principal balance of 179.3 million Lempiras
(approximately U.S. $8.2 million) under the loan agreement entered into by the subsidiary in March 2014 with Banco de America
Central Honduras, S.A.
25
In March 2015, the Company’s Honduras subsidiary entered into a loan agreement with Citibank, N.A. The agreement
establishes a credit facility for U.S. $8.5 million with a variable interest rate of three-month LIBOR plus 3.25%. The loan term
is for five years with quarterly interest and principal payments. This loan is secured by assets of the Company's Honduras
subsidiary. The loan was funded at execution. In March 2015, the Company’s Honduras subsidiary entered into a cross-currency
interest rate swap agreement with Citibank, N.A. for a notional amount of U.S. $8.5 million. The cross-currency interest rate
swap agreement converts the Honduras subsidiary's U.S. dollar denominated principal and floating interest payments on the U.S.
$8.5 million long-term quarterly amortizing debt with Citibank to functional currency principal and fixed interest payments during
the life of the hedging instrument. As changes in foreign exchange and interest rates impact the future cash flow of principal and
interest payments, the hedge is intended to offset changes in cash flows attributable to interest rate and foreign exchange
movements. The hedged loan has a variable interest rate of three-month LIBOR plus 3.25%. Under the cross-currency interest
rate swap agreement, the Company will receive variable U.S. dollar principal and interest based on the three-month LIBOR rate
plus 3.25% on a quarterly amortizing notional amount of U.S. $8.5 million and pay fixed interest of 10.75% on a quarterly
amortizing notional amount of 185.6 million Honduran Lempiras for a term of approximately five years (effective date of
March 24, 2015 through March 20, 2020). The LIBOR reset dates for the hedged long-term debt and the cross-currency interest
rate swap occur on the 24th day of March, June, September, and December beginning on June 24, 2015.
In February 2015, the Company's Honduras subsidiary paid down a loan entered into in March 2010. The loan
agreement was with Banco Del Pais, S.A. for a loan based in Honduran Lempiras that was equivalent to approximately U.S. $6.0
million, which was scheduled to be paid over five years. The Company’s Honduras subsidiary also had an agreement with Banco
Del Pais to open and maintain a certificate of deposit as collateral for this loan. The certificate of deposit was automatically
renewable by Banco Del Pais on an annual basis for the net amortized outstanding balance. The net amortized outstanding
balance for the loan on the date of the loan pay down was approximately U.S. $87,000. The certificate of deposit released at the
date of payment was approximately U.S.$2.9 million.
In January 2015, the Company's Trinidad subsidiary entered into a loan agreement with Citibank, Limited. The
agreement establishes a credit facility for $23.0 million Trinidad and Tobago Dollars (approximately $3.6 million U.S. dollars)
with a fixed interest rate of 4.45%. The loan term is for four years with monthly interest and quarterly principal payments. The
loan was funded in February 2015.
In December 2014, the Company's Colombia subsidiary entered into a loan agreement with Citibank, N.A. The
agreement establishes a credit facility for U.S. $15.0 million with a variable interest rate of three-month LIBOR plus 2.8%. The
loan term is for five years with quarterly interest and principal payments. The loan was funded in December 2014. Also in
December 2014, the Company's Colombia subsidiary entered into a cross-currency interest rate swap agreement with Citibank,
N.A for a notional amount of U.S. $15.0 million related to this loan. The cross-currency interest rate swap agreement converts
the Colombia subsidiary's U.S. dollar denominated principal and floating interest payments on the first U.S. $7.9 million of the
total U.S. $15.0 million long-term quarterly amortizing debt with Citibank to functional currency principal and fixed interest
payments during the life of the hedging instrument. As changes in foreign exchange and interest rates impact the future cash
flow of principal and interest payments, the hedge is intended to offset changes in cash flows attributable to interest rate and
foreign exchange movements. Under the cross-currency interest rate swap agreement, the Company will receive variable U.S.
dollar principal and interest based on the three-month LIBOR rate plus 2.8% on a quarterly amortizing notional amount of U.S.
$15.0 million and pay fixed interest of 8.25% on a quarterly amortizing notional amount of 34,350,000,000 Colombian Pesos for
a term of approximately five years. The LIBOR reset dates for the hedged long-term debt and the cross-currency interest rate
swap occur on the fourth day of March, June, September and December beginning in March 2015.
In November 2014, our Panama subsidiary drew down the final U.S. $10.0 million available against the credit facility
established in March 2014 under a loan agreement with The Bank of Nova Scotia. That agreement established a credit facility
of U.S. $34.0 million at a variable interest rate of 30-day LIBOR plus 3.5% for a five year term, monthly principal and interest
payments, and a U.S. $17.0 million principal payment due at maturity. The facility provides a five year renewal option upon
approval of the Bank of Nova Scotia. The loan is secured by assets of our Panama subsidiary. During April 2014, we drew down
U.S. $24.0 million of the U.S. $34.0 million facility and repaid borrowings due to MetroBank, S.A. of U.S. $3.2 million. In
December 2014, the Company's Panama subsidiary entered into an interest rate swap agreement with the Bank of Nova Scotia
for a notional amount of U.S. $10.0 million related to this loan. The interest rate swap agreement converts the Panama subsidiary's
floating interest payments on the first U.S. $5.0 million of the total U.S. $10.0 million long-term monthly amortizing debt with
the Bank of Nova Scotia to fixed interest payments during the life of the hedging instrument. As changes in interest rates impact
the future cash flows of loan interest payments, the hedge is intended to offset changes in cash flows attributable to variable
interest rate movements. Under the interest rate swap agreement, the Company will receive variable interest based on the 30-day
LIBOR rate plus 3.5% on a monthly amortizing notional amount of U.S. $10.0 million and pay fixed interest of 5.2% for a term
of approximately five years. The LIBOR reset dates for the hedged long-term debt and the interest rate swap occur on the 28th
day of each month beginning on December 29, 2014.
In October 2014, our Honduras subsidiary entered into a loan agreement with Citibank, N.A. The agreement establishes
a credit facility for U.S. $5.0 million with a variable interest rate of three-month LIBOR plus 3.5%. The loan term is for five
26
years with quarterly interest and principal payments. This loan is secured by assets of the Company's Honduras subsidiary. In
October 2014, the Company's Honduras subsidiary entered into a cross-currency interest rate swap agreement with Citibank, N.A
for a notional amount of U.S. $5.0 million. The cross-currency interest rate swap agreement converts the Honduras subsidiary
U.S. dollar denominated principal and floating interest payments on the first U.S. $3.0 million of the total U.S. $5.0 million long-
term quarterly amortizing debt with Citibank to functional currency principal and fixed interest payments during the life of the
hedging instrument. As changes in foreign exchange and interest rates impact the future cash flow of principal and interest
payments, the hedge is intended to offset changes in cash flows attributable to interest rate and foreign exchange movements.
Under the cross-currency interest rate swap agreement, the Company will receive variable U.S. dollar principal and interest based
on the three-month LIBOR rate plus 3.5% on a quarterly amortizing notional amount of U.S. $5.0 million and pay fixed interest
of 11.6% on a quarterly amortizing notional amount of 106,576,000 Honduran Lempiras for a term of approximately three years.
The LIBOR reset dates for the hedged long-term debt and the cross-currency interest rate swap occur on the 22nd day of January,
April, July and October, beginning on January 22, 2015. The loan was funded at execution.
In October 2014, our Honduras subsidiary paid off the U.S. $3.2 million outstanding under the loan agreement entered
into by the subsidiary on January 12, 2010 with Scotiabank El Salvador, S.A. The original agreement established a loan facility
for U.S. $6.0 million.
In October 2014, our Honduras subsidiary entered into a loan agreement with The Bank of Nova Scotia. The agreement
establishes a credit facility for $3.4 million with a variable interest rate of 30-day LIBOR plus 3.5%. The loan term is for five
years with monthly interest and principal payments. The purpose of the loan was to refinance the previously existing loan with
ScotiaBank El Salvador, S.A. This loan is secured by assets of the Company's Honduras subsidiary.
Derivatives
We are exposed to certain risks relating to our ongoing business operations. One risk managed by us using derivative
instruments is interest rate risk. To manage interest rate exposure, we enter into hedging transactions (interest rate swaps) using
derivative financial instruments. The objective of entering into interest rate swaps is to eliminate the variability of cash flows in
the interest payments associated with variable-rate LIBOR loans over the life of the loans. As changes in interest rates impact
the future cash flow of interest payments, the hedges provide a synthetic offset to interest rate movements.
In addition, we are exposed to foreign currency and interest rate cash flow exposure related to non-functional currency
long-term debt of two of our wholly owned subsidiaries. To manage foreign currency and interest rate cash flow exposure, these
subsidiaries enter into cross-currency interest rate swaps that convert their U.S. dollar denominated floating interest payments to
functional currency fixed interest payments during the life of the hedging instrument. As changes in foreign exchange and interest
rates impact the future cash flow of interest payments, the hedges are intended to offset changes in cash flows attributable to
interest rate and foreign exchange movements.
We are also exposed to foreign-currency exchange-rate fluctuations on U.S. dollar denominated liabilities within our
international subsidiaries whose functional currency is other than the U.S. dollar. We manage these fluctuations, in part, through
the use of non-deliverable forward foreign-exchange contracts that are intended to offset changes in cash flow attributable to
currency exchange movements. The contracts are intended primarily to economically address exposure to U.S. dollar
merchandise inventory expenditures made by our international subsidiaries whose functional currency is other than the U.S.
dollar. We seek to mitigate foreign-currency exchange-rate risk with the use of these contracts and do not intend to engage in
speculative transactions. Currently, these contracts do not contain any credit-risk-related contingent features. These contracts do
not qualify for derivative hedge accounting. The forward currency hedges are not effective cash flow hedges because the notional
amount and maturity date of the forward contract does not coincide with the accounts payable balance and due dates. The hedge
ineffectiveness is measured by use of the “hypothetical derivative method,” and we record the changes in the fair value of the
forward contract related to the re-measurement of the payable at spot exchange rates as exchange rate gains or losses. The implied
interest rate included within the forward contract is reflected in earnings as interest expense.
For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the gain or loss
on the derivative is reported as a component of other comprehensive income (loss) and reclassified into earnings in the same
period or periods during which the hedged transaction is determined to be ineffective. There were no such amounts for the periods
reported herein.
27
The following table summarizes agreements for which we recorded cash flow hedge accounting transactions during the
twelve months ended August 31, 2016:
Date
Entered
into
Derivative
Financial
Counter-
party
Derivative
Financial
Instruments
Initial
US$
Notional
Amount
Bank
US$
loan
Held
with
Floating Leg
(swap
counter-
party)
Fixed Rate
for PSMT
Subsidiary
Settlement
Dates
28-Aug-15 Citibank, N.A.
Cross currency
$
7,500,000 Citibank,
Variable rate
7.65 % 28th day of August,
Subsidiary
Costa Rica
("Citi")
interest rate swap
N.A.
3-month Libor
plus 2.50%
November, February,
and May beginning on
November 30, 2015
Honduras
24-Mar-15 Citibank, N.A.
Cross currency
$
8,500,000 Citibank,
Variable rate
10.75 % 24th day of March,
("Citi")
interest rate swap
N.A.
3-month Libor
plus 3.25%
June, September, and
December beginning
on June 24, 2015
Effective
Period of swap
August 28, 2015 -
August 28, 2020
March 24,2015 -
March 20, 2020
El Salvador
16-Dec-14 Bank of Nova
Interest rate swap
$
4,000,000 Bank of
Scotia
("Scotiabank")
Nova
Scotia
Variable rate
30-day Libor
plus 3.5%
4.78 % 29th day of each
month beginning on
December 29, 2014
December 1, 2014 -
August 29, 2019
Colombia
10-Dec-14
Citibank, N.A.
Cross currency
$
15,000,000 Citibank,
Variable rate
8.25 % 4th day of March,
("Citi")
interest rate swap
N.A.
3-month Libor
plus 2.8%
December 4, 2014 -
December 3, 2019
June, Sept, Dec.
beginning on March 4,
2015
Panama
9-Dec-14
Bank of Nova
Interest rate swap
$
10,000,000 Bank of
Scotia
("Scotiabank")
Nova
Scotia
Variable rate
30-day Libor
plus 3.5%
5.16 % 28th day of each
month beginning
December 29, 2014
November 28, 2014 -
November 29, 2019
Honduras
23-Oct-14
Citibank, N.A.
Cross currency
$
5,000,000 Citibank,
Variable rate
11.6 % 22nd day of January,
("Citi")
interest rate swap
N.A.
3-month Libor
plus 3.5%
April, July, and
October beginning on
January 22, 2015
October 22, 2014 -
October 22, 2017
Panama
1-Aug-14
Bank of Nova
Interest rate swap
$
5,000,000 Bank of
Scotia
("Scotiabank")
Nova
Scotia
Panama
22-May-14 Bank of Nova
Interest rate swap
$
19,800,000 Bank of
Scotia
("Scotiabank")
Nova
Scotia
Panama
22-May-14 Bank of Nova
Interest rate swap
$
3,970,000 Bank of
Scotia
("Scotiabank")
Nova
Scotia
Variable rate
30-day Libor
plus 3.5%
Variable rate
30-day Libor
plus 3.5%
Variable rate
30-day Libor
plus 3.5%
4.89 % 21st day of each month
beginning on
September 22, 2014
August 21, 2014 -
August 21, 2019
4.98 % 4th day of each month
beginning on June 4,
2014
May 5, 2014 -
April 4, 2019
4.98 % 4th day of each month
beginning on June 4,
2014
May 5, 2014 -
April 4, 2019
We measure the fair value for all financial assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the
financial statements on a recurring basis during the reporting period. We have designated the interest rate swaps and cross-
currency interest rate swap agreements as hedging instruments and have accounted for them under hedge accounting rules.
Derivatives listed on the table below were designated as cash flow hedging instruments. The table summarizes the effect of the
fair value of interest rate swap and cross-currency interest rate swap derivative instruments that qualify for derivative hedge
accounting and its associated tax effect on accumulated other comprehensive (income) / loss (in thousands, except footnote data):
Derivatives designated as cash flow
hedging instruments
Cross-currency interest rate swaps(1)
Interest rate swaps
Cross-currency interest rate swaps
Net fair value of derivatives
designated as hedging instruments
Balance Sheet
Location
Other non-current
assets
Other long-term
liabilities
Other long-term
liabilities
August 31, 2016
Net Tax
Effect
Fair
Value
Net
OCI
August 31, 2015
Net Tax
Effect
Fair
Value
Net
OCI
$
3,224
(1,248)
1,976 $
4,129 $
(1) $ (4,128)
(448)
115
(333)
(387)
98
289
(1,066)
320
(746)
(1,312)
482
830
$
1,710 $
(813) $
897 $
2,430 $
579 $ (3,009)
(1) The beneficial tax effect of these swaps is largely offset by a valuation allowance.
28
The Company did not settle any derivatives during fiscal year 2016. The following table summarizes the derivatives
that were settled during the twelve months ended August 31, 2015 (in thousands):
Date
23-Jul-15
31-Jul-15
31-Jul-15
6-Aug-15
Payment of
Derivative
Obligation
Foreign
Exchange on
Derivative
Obligation
$
$
5,141
1,343
4,029
4,944
15,457
2,929
670
2,011
3,181
8,791
Recognize
Settlement of
Derivative
Right net of
Bank Fees
(2,859)
(657)
(1,971)
(3,056)
(8,543)
Swap
Derivative
(Gain)Loss
50
11
21
70
152
(1)
(1) Reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to other income (expense) for settlement of derivative
instruments in the amount of $100,000, net of tax.
From time to time, we enter into non-deliverable forward exchange contracts. These contracts are treated for accounting
purposes as fair value contracts and do not qualify for derivative hedge accounting.
The following table summarizes these agreements as of August 31, 2016:
Dates
entered into
Aug-16
Derivative
Financial
Counter-party
Derivative
Financial
Instrument
Banco Colpatria Forward foreign
Subsidiary
Colombia
Colombia
Aug-16
Citibank, N.A.
Costa Rica (1) 31-Aug-16
Citibank, N.A.
exchange contracts
Forward foreign
exchange contracts
Forward foreign
exchange contracts
Notional
Amount
(in thousands) Settlement Date
Effective Period
of Forward
$
$
$
4,800 October 2016 -
November 2016
460 November 23,
2016
3,750 August 30, 2017
August 2016 -
November 2016
August 2016 -
November 2016
August 31, 2016-
August 30, 2017
(1) The original non-deliverable forward foreign-exchange contract, entered on August 31, 2015, was settled on August 30, 2016
and reissued on August 31, 2016 for the same amount of $3.8 million.
The following table summarizes the fair value of foreign currency forward contracts that do not qualify for derivative
hedge accounting (in thousands):
Derivatives designated as fair value hedging instruments
Foreign currency forward contracts
Net fair value of derivatives designated as hedging
instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting
August 31, 2016
August 31, 2015
Balance Sheet
Location
Other accrued
expenses
Fair Value
$
(110)
$
(110)
Balance Sheet
Location
Other accrued
expenses
Fair Value
$
$
(66)
(66)
29
Short-Term Borrowings and Long-Term Debt
Short-term borrowings consist of lines of credit which are secured by certain assets of the Company and its subsidiaries.
The short-term borrowing facilities are summarized below (in thousands):
Total Amount
of Facilities
Short-term
Borrowings
Letters of
Credit
Facilities
Available
Weighted average
interest rate
August 31, 2016
August 31, 2015
$
$
65,000 $
57,691 $
16,534 $
6,606 $
9,224 $
728 $
39,242
50,357
10.1 %(1)
5.9 %
Facilities Used
(1)
Increased from prior year due to increased borrowing in the Company’s Colombia subsidiary for which we pay a
higher interest rate.
As of August 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company had approximately $40.0 million of short-term facilities in the U.S. that
require compliance with certain quarterly financial covenants. As of August 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company was in compliance
with respect to these covenants. Each of the facilities expires annually and is normally renewed.
The following table provides the changes in our long-term debt for the twelve months ended August 31, 2016:
(Amounts in thousands)
Balances as of August 31, 2015
Proceeds from long-term debt incurred during the period:
Costa Rica subsidiary
Trinidad subsidiary
Repayments of long-term debt:
Repayment of loan by Trinidad subsidiary
Regularly scheduled loan payments
Reclassifications of long-term debt
Translation adjustments on foreign-currency debt of subsidiaries
whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar (2)
Balances as of August 31, 2016
Current
portion of
long-
term debt
Long-term
debt (net of
current
portion)
Total
$
17,169 $
73,365 $
90,534 (1)
—
1,000
(2,771)
(553)
(731)
7,370
6,000
—
(13,200)
731
7,370
7,000
(2,771)
(13,753)
—
451
14,565 $
(724)
73,542 $
(273)
88,107 (3)
$
(1) The carrying amount on non-cash assets assigned as collateral for this total was $104.1 million. No cash assets were assigned
as collateral for this total.
(2) These foreign currency translation adjustments are recorded within Other comprehensive income.
(3) The carrying amount on non-cash assets assigned as collateral for this total was $102.4 million. No cash assets were assigned
as collateral for this total.
As of August 31, 2016, the Company had approximately $76.0 million of long-term loans in Trinidad, Panama, El
Salvador, Honduras, Costa Rica, Barbados and Colombia that require these subsidiaries to comply with certain annual or quarterly
financial covenants, which include debt service and leverage ratios. As of August 31, 2016, the Company was in compliance
with all covenants or amended covenants.
30
As of August 31, 2015, the Company had approximately $85.0 million of long-term loans in Trinidad, Panama, El
Salvador, Honduras, Costa Rica, Barbados, and Colombia that require these subsidiaries to comply with certain annual or
quarterly financial covenants, which include debt service and leverage ratios. As of August 31, 2015, the Company was in
compliance with all covenants or amended covenants.
Contractual Obligations
Contractual obligations
Long-term debt and interest(1)
Operating leases(2)
Additional capital contribution commitments
to joint ventures(3)
Data recovery services(4)
Distribution center services(5)
Medley, Miami Distribution Center (6)
Warehouse club construction commitments (7)
Total
$
$
Less than
1 Year
1 to 3
Years
Payments due in:
4 to 5
Years
After
5 Years
Total
18,929 $
11,246
45,830 $
22,030
31,280 $
18,794
2,557 $
68,786
98,596
120,856
884
37
166
46,000
1,500
78,762 $
—
—
—
—
—
67,860 $
—
—
—
—
—
50,074 $
—
—
—
—
—
71,343 $
884
37
166
46,000
1,500
268,039
(1) Long-term debt includes debt with both fixed and variable interest rates. We have used variable rates as of August 31, 2016
to calculate future estimated payments related to the variable rate items. For the portion of the loans subject to interest rate
swaps and cross-currency interest rate swaps, we have used the fixed interest rate as set by the interest rate swaps.
(2) Operating lease obligations have been reduced by approximately $427,000 to reflect the amounts net of sublease income.
(3) Amounts shown are the contractual capital contribution requirements for our investment in the joint ventures that we have
agreed to make; however, the parties intend to seek alternate financing for these projects. The parties may mutually agree
on changes to the project, which could increase or decrease the amount of contributions each party is required to provide.
(4) Amounts shown are the minimum payments under our off-site data recovery services agreement.
(5) Amounts shown are the minimum payments under distribution center service agreements for Mexico City.
(6)
In March 2016, the Company entered into a contract to acquire a distribution center in Miami-Dade County, Florida. The
Company currently expects completion to be in the first half of calendar year 2017.
(7) The amounts shown represent contractual obligations for construction services not yet rendered.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have had, or are reasonably likely to have, a
material current or future effect on its financial condition or consolidated financial statements.
Repurchase of Equity Securities and Reissuance of Treasury Shares
At the vesting dates for restricted stock awards to our employees, we repurchase a portion of the shares that have vested
at the prior day's closing price per share, with the funds used to pay the employees' minimum statutory tax withholding
requirements related to the vesting of restricted stock awards. We do not have a stock repurchase program.
Shares of common stock repurchased by us are recorded at cost as treasury stock and result in the reduction of
stockholders’ equity in our consolidated balance sheets. We may reissue these treasury shares. When treasury shares are reissued,
we use the first in/first out (“FIFO”) cost method for determining cost of the reissued shares. If the issuance price is higher than
the cost, the excess of the issuance price over the cost is credited to additional paid-in capital (“APIC”). If the issuance price is
lower than the cost, the difference is first charged against any credit balance in APIC from treasury stock and the balance is
charged to retained earnings.
The following table summarizes the shares repurchased during fiscal years 2016 and 2015:
Shares repurchased
Cost of repurchase of shares (in thousands)
August 31,
2016
Years Ended
August 31,
2015
43,171
52,396
$
3,334 $
4,677 $
August 31,
2014
50,898
4,773
31
We have reissued treasury shares as part of our stock-based compensation programs. However, as summarized below,
no treasury shares were reissued during the periods presented:
Reissued treasury shares
Critical Accounting Estimates
August 31,
2016
Years Ended
August 31,
2015
August 31,
2014
—
—
—
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements requires that management make estimates and judgments that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Some of our accounting policies
require management to make difficult and subjective judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates of matters that
are inherently uncertain. Management continues to review its accounting policies and evaluate its estimates, including those
related to contingencies and litigation, income taxes, value added taxes, and long-lived assets. We base our estimates on historical
experience and on other assumptions that management believes to be reasonable under the present circumstances. Using different
estimates could have a material impact on our financial condition and results of operations.
Contingencies and Litigation: In the ordinary course of business, we are periodically named as a defendant in various
lawsuits, claims and pending actions and are exposed to tax risks (other than income tax). The principal risks that we insure
against are workers’ compensation, general liability, vehicle liability, property damage, employment practices, errors and
omissions, fiduciary liability and fidelity losses. If a potential loss arising from these lawsuits, claims, actions and non-income
tax issues is probable and reasonably estimable, we record the estimated liability based on circumstances and assumptions existing
at the time. The estimates affecting our litigation reserves can be affected by new claims filed after the balance sheet date with
respect to events occurring prior to the balance sheet date and developments in pending litigation that may affect the outcome of
the litigation. While we believe the recorded liabilities are adequate, there are inherent limitations in projecting the outcome of
litigation and in evaluating the probable additional tax associated with various non-income tax filing positions. As such, we are
unable to make a reasonable estimate of the sensitivity to change of estimates affecting our recorded liabilities. As additional
information becomes available, we assess the potential liability and revise our estimates as appropriate.
Income Taxes: We account for income taxes using the asset and liability method. Under the asset and liability method,
deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial
statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences and carry-
forwards are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is
recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is established when necessary to
reduce deferred tax assets to amounts expected to be realized. As of August 31, 2016, we evaluated our deferred tax assets and
liabilities and determined that a valuation allowance was necessary for certain foreign deferred tax asset balances, primarily
because of the existence of significant negative objective evidence, such as the fact that certain subsidiaries are in a cumulative
loss position for the past three years, indicating that certain net operating loss carry-forward periods are not sufficient to realize
the related deferred tax assets.
We and our subsidiaries are required to file federal and state income tax returns in the United States and various other
tax returns in foreign jurisdictions. The preparation of these tax returns requires us to interpret the applicable tax laws and
regulations in effect in such jurisdictions, which could affect the amount of tax we pay. In consultation with our tax advisors, we
base our tax returns on interpretations that we believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. The tax returns, however, are
subject to routine reviews by the various federal, state and foreign taxing authorities in the jurisdictions in which we or one of
our subsidiaries file tax returns. As part of these reviews, a taxing authority may disagree with respect to the income tax positions
we have taken (“uncertain tax positions”) and, therefore, require us or one of our subsidiaries to pay additional taxes.
We accrue an amount for our estimate of probable additional income tax liability. In certain cases, the impact of an
uncertain income tax position on the income tax return must be recognized at the largest amount that is more likely than not to
be sustained upon audit by the relevant tax authority. An uncertain income tax position will not be recognized if it has less than
50% likelihood of being sustained. This requires significant judgment, the use of estimates, and the interpretation and application
of complex tax laws. When facts and circumstances change, we reassess these probabilities and record any changes in the
consolidated financial statements as appropriate. There were no material changes in our uncertain income tax positions for the
periods ended on August 31, 2016 and 2015. During the first quarter of fiscal year 2015, one of the Company’s subsidiaries
received provisional assessments claiming $2.5 million of taxes, penalties and interest related to withholding taxes on certain
charges for services rendered by the Company. In addition, this subsidiary received provisional assessments totaling $5.1 million
for lack of deductibility of the underlying service charges due to the lack of withholding. Based on the Company's interpretation
32
of local law, rulings and jurisprudence (including Supreme Court precedents with respect to the deductibility assessment), the
Company expects to prevail in both instances and has not recorded a provision for these assessments.
We have not provided for U.S. deferred taxes on cumulative non-U.S. undistributed earnings as we deem such earnings
to be indefinitely reinvested. It is not practicable to determine the U.S. federal income tax liability that would be associated with
the repatriation earnings because of the complexity of the computation.
Tax Receivables: We pay Value Added Tax (“VAT”) or similar taxes (“input VAT”), income taxes, and other taxes
within the normal course of our business in most of the countries in which we operate related to the procurement of merchandise
and/or services we acquires and/or on sales and taxable income. We also collect VAT or similar taxes on behalf of the government
(“output VAT”) for merchandise and/or services we sell. If the output VAT exceeds the input VAT, then the difference is remitted
to the government, usually on a monthly basis. If the input VAT exceeds the output VAT, this creates a VAT receivable. In
most countries where we operate, the governments have implemented additional collection procedures, such as requiring credit
card processors to remit a portion of sales processed via credit card directly to the government as advance payments of VAT
and/or income tax. In the case of VAT, these procedures alter the natural offset of input and output VAT and generally leave us
with a net VAT receivable, forcing us to process significant refund claims on a recurring basis. With respect to income taxes
paid, if the estimated income taxes paid or withheld exceed the actual income tax due this creates an income tax receivable. We
either request a refund of these tax receivables or apply the balance to expected future tax payments. These refund or offset
processes can take anywhere from several months to several years to complete.
In most countries where we operate, the tax refund process is defined and structured with regular refunds or offsets.
However, in three countries there is either not a clearly defined process or the governments have alleged there is not a clearly
defined process to allow the authorities to refund VAT receivables. We, together with our tax and legal advisers, are currently
appealing these interpretations in court and expect to prevail. In one of these countries, where there is favorable jurisprudence,
the government performed an audit to verify the amount of the respective VAT receivables as a required precursor to any refund.
The balance of the VAT receivable in these countries was $7.6 million and $6.5 million as of August 31, 2016 and 2015,
respectively. In another country in which the Company has warehouse clubs, beginning in fiscal year 2015, a new minimum
income tax mechanism took effect, which requires us to pay taxes based on a percentage of sales rather than income. As a result,
we are making income tax payments substantially in excess of those we would expect to pay based on taxable income. The current
rules (which we have challenged in court) do not clearly allow us to obtain a refund or offset this excess income tax against other
taxes. As of August 31, 2016, the Company had deferred tax assets of approximately $1.9 million in this country. Also, the
Company had an income tax receivable balance of $2.5 million as of August 31, 2016, related to excess payments from fiscal
year 2015 and 2016. We have not placed any type of allowance on the recoverability of these tax receivables or deferred tax
assets because we believe that it is more likely than not that we will succeed in our refund request and/or court challenge on this
matter.
Our policy for classification and presentation of VAT receivables, income tax receivables and other tax receivables is as
follows:
(cid:120)
Short-term VAT and Income tax receivables, recorded as Other current assets: This classification is used for any
countries where our subsidiary has generally demonstrated the ability to recover the VAT or income tax receivable
within one year. We also classify as short-term any approved refunds or credit notes to the extent that we expect to
receive the refund or use the credit notes within one year.
(cid:120) Long-term VAT and Income tax receivables, recorded as Other non-current assets: This classification is used for
amounts not approved for refund or credit in countries where our subsidiary has not demonstrated the ability to obtain
refunds within one year and/or for amounts which are subject to outstanding disputes. An allowance is provided against
VAT and income tax receivable balances in dispute when we do not expect to eventually prevail in its recovery.
Long-lived Assets: We periodically evaluate our long-lived assets for indicators of impairment. Indicators that an asset
may be impaired are:
(cid:120)
(cid:120)
(cid:120)
(cid:120)
the asset's inability to continue to generate income from operations and positive cash flow in future periods;
loss of legal ownership or title to the asset;
significant changes in its strategic business objectives and utilization of the asset(s); and
the impact of significant negative industry or economic trends.
Management's judgments are based on market and operational conditions at the time of the evaluation and can include
management's best estimate of future business activity, which in turn drives estimates of future cash flows from these assets.
These periodic evaluations could cause management to conclude that impairment factors exist, requiring an adjustment of these
assets to their then-current fair market value. Future business conditions and/or activity could differ materially from the
projections made by management causing the need for additional impairment charges. No impairment charges have been
33
recorded during fiscal year 2016 related to the loss of legal ownership or title to assets; significant changes in the Company's
strategic business objectives or utilization of assets; or the impact of significant negative industry or economic trends. Loss/(gain)
on disposal of assets recorded during the years reported resulted from improvements to operations and normal preventive
maintenance.
Seasonality
Historically, our merchandising businesses have experienced holiday retail seasonality in their markets. In addition to
seasonal fluctuations, our operating results fluctuate quarter-to-quarter as a result of economic and political events in markets that
we serve, the timing of holidays, weather, the timing of shipments, product mix, and currency effects on the cost of U.S.-sourced
products which may make these products more or less expensive in local currencies and therefore more or less affordable.
Because of such fluctuations, the results of operations of any quarter are not indicative of the results that may be achieved for a
full fiscal year or any future quarter. In addition, there can be no assurance that our future results will be consistent with past
results or the projections of securities analysts.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and commodity price risk.
These market risks arise in the normal course of business. We do not engage in speculative trading activities. To manage the risk
arising from these exposures, we utilize interest rate swaps, cross-currency interest rate swaps, non-deliverable foreign currency
forward contracts and loans denominated in foreign currencies. For a discussion of our accounting policies for derivative
instruments and further disclosures, please see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 12 - Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities.
Each market risk sensitivity analysis presented below is based on hypothetical scenarios used to calibrate potential risk
and do not represent our view of future market changes. The effect of a change in a particular assumption is calculated without
adjusting any other assumption. In reality, however, a change in one factor could cause a change in another factor, which may
magnify or negate other sensitivities.
Interest Rate Risk
We are exposed to changes in interest rates as a result of our short-term borrowings and long-term debt borrowings. We
have mitigated a portion of our interest rate risk by managing the mix of fixed and variable rate debt and by entering into interest
rate swaps and cross-currency interest rate swaps to hedge interest rate risk. The notional amount, interest payment and maturity
dates of the swap match the terms of the associated debt.
The table below provides information about our financial instruments that are sensitive to changes in interest rates. For
debt obligations, the table represents the principal cash flows and related weighted-average interest rates by expected maturity
dates. For interest rate swaps, including cross-currency interest rate swaps, the table represents the contractual cash flows and
weighted-average interest rates by the contractual maturity date, unless otherwise noted. The notional amounts are used to
calculate contractual cash flows to be exchanged under the contracts. The weighted-average variable rates are based upon
prevailing market interest rates and the outstanding balances as of August 31, 2016.
34
Annual maturities of long-term debt and derivatives are as follow (in thousands):
Long-Term Debt:
2017
2018
Twelve Months Ended August 31,
(Amounts in thousands)
2020
2021
2019
Thereafter
Total
Long-term debt with fixed
interest rate
Weighted-average interest
rate
Long-term debt with variable
interest rate
Weighted-average interest
rate
Total long-term debt
$
$
$
5,252
$
5,324
$
4,894
$
7,559
$
7,177
$
386
$
30,592
(1)
8.06 %
8.06 %
8.06 %
8.16 %
6.55 %
8.00 %
7.88 %
8,850
$
8,651
$
19,911
$
13,558
$
1,217
$
2,017
$
54,204
3.53 %
$
14,102
3.53 %
$
13,975
3.55 %
$
24,805
3.43 %
$
21,117
2.89 %
$
8,394
2.89%
$
2,403
3.48 %
84,796
(1)
Derivatives:
Interest Rate Swaps:
Variable to fixed interest
Weighted-average pay rate
Weighted-average receive
rate
Cross-Currency Interest
Rate Swaps:
Variable to fixed interest
Weighted-average pay rate
Weighted-average receive
rate
$
5,200
$
4.97 %
5,200
$
4.97 %
16,608
$
4.97 %
5,250
$
5.16 %
—
$
— %
—
$
—%
32,258
5.00 %
4.01 %
4.01 %
4.01 %
4.01 %
— %
—%
4.01 %
$
3,637
$
9.54 %
3,709
$
9.58 %
3,709
$
9.58 %
12,072
$
9.25 %
3,750
7.65 %
—
$
—%
26,877
9.16 %
4.06 %
4.06 %
4.06 %
4.15 %
3.31 %
—%
4.00 %
(1) The Company has disclosed the future annual maturities of long-term debt, for which it has entered into cross-currency
interest rate swaps, using the derivative obligation as of August 31, 2016 to estimate the future commitments. Therefore, the
total annual commitments reflects these obligations, including the effect of the cross-currency interest rate swaps on the total-
long term debt as disclosed on the consolidated balance sheet.
Foreign Currency Risk
We have foreign currency risks related to sales, operating expenses and financing transactions in currencies other than
the U.S. dollar. As of August 31, 2016, we had a total of 38 consolidated warehouse clubs operating in 12 foreign countries and
one U.S. territory, 30 of which operate under currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Approximately 52% of our net warehouse
sales are comprised of products we purchased in U.S. dollars and were sold in countries whose currencies were other than the
U.S. dollar. Approximately, 77% of our net warehouse sales are in foreign currencies. We may enter into additional foreign
countries in the future or open additional locations in existing countries, which may increase the percentage of net warehouse
sales denominated in foreign currencies.
Currency exchange rate changes either increase or decrease the cost of imported products that we purchase in U.S.
dollars and price in local currency. Price changes can impact the demand for those products in the market. Currency exchange
rates also affect the reported sales of the consolidated company when local currency-denominated sales are translated to U.S.
dollars. In addition, we revalue all U.S. dollar denominated assets and liabilities within those markets that do not use the U.S.
dollar as the functional currency. These assets and liabilities include, but are not limited to, excess cash permanently reinvested
offshore and the value of items shipped from the U.S. to our foreign markets. The gain or loss associated with this revaluation,
net of reserves, is recorded in other income (expense).
35
Foreign currencies in most of the countries where we operate have historically devalued against the U.S. dollar and are
expected to continue to devalue. The following tables summarize by country, for those countries with functional currencies other
than the U.S. dollar, the weakening of the countries' currency against the U.S. dollar (devaluation) or the strengthening of their
currencies (revaluation):
Country
Colombia
Costa Rica
Dominican Republic
Guatemala
Honduras
Jamaica
Nicaragua
Trinidad
Revaluation/(Devaluation)
Twelve Months Ended August 31,
2016
% Change
2015
% Change
5.39 %
(2.99) %
(2.04) %
1.65 %
(4.25) %
(8.27) %
(5.00) %
(5.60) %
(60.26) %
0.85 %
(3.21) %
1.13 %
(4.06) %
(4.37) %
(5.03) %
(0.04) %
We seek to manage foreign exchange risk by (1) adjusting prices on goods acquired in U.S. dollars on a periodic basis
to maintain our target margins after taking into account changes in exchange rates; (2) obtaining local currency loans from banks
within certain markets where it is economical to do so and where management believes the risk of devaluation and the level of
U.S. dollar denominated liabilities warrants this action; (3) reducing the time between the acquisition of product in U.S. dollars
and the settlement of that purchase in local currency; (4) maintaining a balance between assets held in local currency and in U.S.
dollars; and (5) by entering into cross-currency interest rate swaps and forward currency derivatives. We have local-currency-
denominated long-term loans in Costa Rica, Trinidad and Tobago, Guatemala and Barbados; we have cross-currency interest rate
swaps and forward currency derivatives in Costa Rica and Colombia; we have cross-currency interest rate swaps in Honduras
and we have interest rate swaps in Panama and El Salvador. Turbulence in the currency markets can have a significant impact on
the value of the foreign currencies within the countries in which we operate. We report the gains or losses associated with the
revaluation of these monetary assets and liabilities on our Consolidated Statements of Income under the heading “Other income
(expense), net.” Future volatility and uncertainties regarding the currencies in the countries that we operate in could have a
material impact on our operations in future periods. However, there is no way to accurately forecast how currencies may trade in
the future and, as a result, we cannot accurately project the impact of the change in rates on our future demand for imported
products, reported sales, or financial results.
We are exposed to foreign exchange risks related to U.S. dollar-denominated and other foreign-denominated cash, cash
equivalents and restricted cash, to U.S. dollar-denominated intercompany debt balances and to other U.S. dollar-denominated
debt/asset balances (excluding U.S. dollar-denominated debt obligations for which we hedge a portion of the currency risk
inherent in the interest and principal payments), within entities whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar. The following
table discloses the net effect on other income (expense) for these U.S. dollar-denominated and other foreign-denominated
accounts relative to hypothetical simultaneous currency devaluation in all the countries listed in the table above, based on balances
as of August 31, 2016:
Gains based on change in
U.S. dollar denominated
and other foreign
denominated cash, cash
equivalents and restricted
cash balances (in
thousands)
(Losses) based on
change in U.S. dollar
denominated inter-
company balances (in
thousands)
(Losses) based on
change in U.S. dollar
denominated other
asset/liability balances,
(in thousands)
Net gain (loss)
3,379 $
6,756 $
13,513 $
(3,290) $
(6,580) $
(13,159) $
(444) $
(888) $
(1,775) $
(355)
(712)
(1,421)
Overall weighted
negative currency
movement
5%
10%
20%
$
$
$
From time to time we have experienced a lack of availability of U.S. dollars in certain markets (U.S. dollar illiquidity).
This impedes our ability to convert local currencies obtained through warehouse sales into U.S. dollars to settle the U.S. dollar
liabilities associated with our imported products. In the second half of fiscal year 2016 and continuing into fiscal year 2017, we
are experiencing this situation in Trinidad (“TT”). We are limited in our ability to convert TT dollars that we generate through
sales of merchandise into U.S. dollars to settle U.S. dollar liabilities, increasing our foreign exchange exposure to any devaluation
of the TT dollar. The June 2016 International Monetary Fund Country Report for Trinidad and Tobago suggests that the TT dollar
could be overvalued, in the range of 20%-50% per U.S. dollar. Until such time that the uncertain state of tradable currency is
resolved, we plan to take steps to limit our exposure. We plan to reduce new shipments of merchandise to Trinidad from our
36
distribution center in Miami to levels that generally align with our Trinidad subsidiary’s ability to pay for the merchandise in U.S.
dollars. Although the situation is dynamic, based on recent levels of tradable currency available, we anticipate reducing U.S.
shipments to Trinidad by approximately 20% over the next three months. This is likely to result in our Trinidad subsidiary
running out of certain merchandise, which could negatively impact sales in Trinidad in the second fiscal quarter by an estimated
$8-$10 million. We plan to increase or decrease shipments from the U.S. in line with our ability to exchange TT dollars for other
hard currencies. We will continue to seek to maximize the level of tradable currency our Trinidad subsidiary can obtain. As of
August 31, 2016, we have net U.S. dollar denominated liabilities of approximately $18.9 million that would be exposed to a
potential devaluation of Trinidad dollars. If for example, a hypothetical 20% devaluation of the TT currency occurred, the net
effect on other expense would be approximately $3.8 million.
We are also exposed to foreign exchange risks related to local-currency-denominated cash and cash equivalents, to local-
currency-denominated debt obligations, to local-currency-denominated current assets and liabilities and to local-currency-
denominated long-term assets and liabilities within entities whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar. The following table
discloses the net effect on other comprehensive income (loss) for these local currency denominated accounts relative to
hypothetical simultaneous currency devaluation in all the countries listed in the table above, based on balances as of August 31,
2016:
Other comprehensive
loss on the decline in
local currency
denominated cash and
cash equivalents and
restricted cash (in
thousands)
Other
comprehensive gain
on the decline in
foreign currency
denominated debt
obligations (in
thousands)
Other comprehensive
loss on the decline in
all other foreign
currency denominated
current assets net of
current liabilities (in
thousands)
Other comprehensive
loss on the decline in
all other foreign
currency denominated
long-term assets net of
long-term liabilities (in
thousands)
$
$
$
4,097 $
8,195 $
16,389 $
2,019 $
4,037 $
8,075 $
7,935 $
15,871 $
31,741 $
12,317
24,634
49,268
Overall weighted
negative currency
movement
5%
10%
20%
In addition, we are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations associated with our U.S. dollar-denominated
debt obligations that we hedge. We hedge a portion of the currency risk inherent in the interest and principal payments associated
with this debt through the use of cross-currency interest rate swaps. The terms of these swap agreements are commensurate with
the underlying debt obligations. The aggregate fair value of these swaps was in a net asset position of approximately $1.2 million
at August 31, 2016 and approximately $2.0 million at August 31, 2015. A hypothetical 10% increase in the currency exchange
rates underlying these swaps from the market rates at August 31, 2016 would have resulted in a further increase in the value of
the swaps of approximately $1.3 million. Conversely, a hypothetical 10% decrease in the currency exchange rates underlying
these swaps from the market rates at August 31, 2016 would have resulted in a net decrease in the value of the swaps of
approximately of $1.4 million.
We use non-deliverable forward foreign exchange contracts primarily to address exposure to U.S. dollar merchandise
inventory expenditures made by our international subsidiaries whose functional currency is other than the U.S. dollar. Currently,
these contracts do not qualify for derivative hedge accounting. The market risk related to foreign currency forward contracts is
measured by estimating the potential impact of a 10% change in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to the local currency exchange
rates. The rates used to perform this analysis were based on the market rates in effect on August 31, 2016. A 10% appreciation of
the U.S. dollar relative to the local currency exchange rates would result in approximately a $539,000 net increase in the fair
value of the contracts. Conversely, a 10% depreciation of the U.S. dollar relative to the local currency exchange rates would result
in approximately a $659,000 net decrease in the fair value of the contracts. However, gains or losses on these derivative
instruments are economically offset by the gains or losses on the underlying transactions.
Commodity Price Risk
The increasing price of oil and certain commodities could have a negative effect on our operating costs and sales. Higher
oil prices can negatively impact the economic growth of the countries in which we operate, thereby reducing the buying power
of our members. Higher oil prices can also increase our operating costs, particularly utilities and distribution expenses.
Inflationary pressures on various commodities also may impact consumer spending. We do not currently seek to hedge commodity
price risk.
37
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of PriceSmart, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of PriceSmart, Inc. as of August 31, 2016 and 2015, and the
related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years
in the period ended August 31, 2016. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures
in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position
of PriceSmart, Inc. at August 31, 2016 and 2015, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended August 31, 2016, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),
PriceSmart, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of August 31, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control-
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework)
and our report dated October 27, 2016, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
San Diego, California
October 27, 2016
38
PRICESMART, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
Short-term restricted cash
Receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $7 as of August 31, 2016 and $0 as
of August 31, 2015, respectively
Merchandise inventories
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
Total current assets
Long-term restricted cash
Property and equipment, net
Goodwill
Deferred tax assets
Other non-current assets (includes $3,224 and $4,129 as of August 31, 2016 and August
31, 2015, respectively, for the fair value of derivative instruments)
Investment in unconsolidated affiliates
Total Assets
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Short-term borrowings
Accounts payable
Accrued salaries and benefits
Deferred membership income
Income taxes payable
Other accrued expenses (includes $110 and $66 as of August 31, 2016 and August 31,
2015, respectively, for the fair value of foreign currency forward contracts)
Long-term debt, current portion
Total current liabilities
Deferred tax liability
Long-term portion of deferred rent
Long-term income taxes payable, net of current portion
Long-term debt, net of current portion
Other long-term liabilities includes $1,514 and $1,699 for the fair value of derivative
instruments and $4,013 and $2,757 for post employment plans as of August 31, 2016 and
August 31, 2015, respectively)
Total Liabilities
August 31,
2016
2015
$
199,522 $
518
157,072
61
7,464
282,907
22,143
512,554
2,676
473,045
35,637
12,258
49,798
10,767
1,096,735 $
$
$
16,534 $
267,173
19,606
20,920
4,226
24,880
14,565
367,904
1,760
8,961
970
73,542
9,662
267,175
22,535
456,505
1,464
433,040
35,871
14,845
39,182
10,317
991,224
6,606
241,978
17,977
20,184
9,595
23,558
17,169
337,067
1,755
6,595
1,402
73,365
5,527
458,664
4,456
424,640
39
Equity:
Common stock $0.0001 par value, 45,000,000 shares authorized; 31,237,658 and
30,977,764 shares issued and 30,401,307 and 30,184,584 shares outstanding (net of
treasury shares) as of August 31, 2016 and August 31, 2015, respectively
Additional paid-in capital
Tax benefit from stock-based compensation
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
Retained earnings
Less: treasury stock at cost, 836,351 and 793,180 shares as of August 31, 2016 and August
31, 2015, respectively
Total Equity
Total Liabilities and Equity
3
412,369
11,321
(103,951)
351,060
3
403,168
10,711
(101,512)
283,611
(32,731)
638,071
1,096,735 $
(29,397)
566,584
991,224
$
See accompanying notes.
40
PRICESMART, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
Revenues:
Net warehouse club sales
Export sales
Membership income
Other income
Total revenues
Operating expenses:
Cost of goods sold:
Net warehouse club
Export
Selling, general and administrative:
Warehouse club operations
General and administrative
Pre-opening expenses
Loss/(gain) on disposal of assets
Total operating expenses
Operating income
Other income (expense):
Interest income
Interest expense
Other income (expense), net
Total other income (expense)
Income before provision for income taxes and
income (loss) of unconsolidated affiliates
Provision for income taxes
Income (loss) of unconsolidated affiliates
Net income
Net income per share available for distribution:
Basic net income per share
Diluted net income per share
Shares used in per share computations:
Basic
Diluted
Dividends per share
Years Ended August 31,
2015
2014
2016
$
2,820,740 $
33,813
45,781
4,842
2,905,176
2,721,132 $
33,279
43,673
4,519
2,802,603
2,444,314
31,279
38,063
3,911
2,517,567
2,417,366
32,260
2,321,074
31,765
2,083,933
29,731
252,130
64,344
1,191
1,162
2,768,453
136,723
1,307
(5,891)
(899)
(5,483)
131,240
(42,849)
332
88,723
241,285
56,371
3,737
2,005
2,656,237
146,366
1,058
(6,440)
(4,388)
(9,770)
136,596
(47,566)
94
89,124
2.92 $
2.92 $
2.95 $
2.95 $
$
$
$
29,928
29,933
29,848
29,855
$
0.70 $
0.70 $
212,476
49,944
3,331
1,445
2,380,860
136,707
853
(4,295)
984
(2,458)
134,249
(41,372)
9
92,886
3.07
3.07
29,747
29,757
0.70
See accompanying notes.
41
PRICESMART, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)
Net income
Other Comprehensive Income, net of tax:
Foreign currency translation adjustments (1)
Defined benefit pension plan:
Net gain (loss) arising during period
Amortization of prior service cost and actuarial gains included in
net periodic pensions cost
Total defined benefit pension plan
Derivative instruments: (2)
Unrealized gains/(losses) on change in
derivative obligations
Unrealized gains/(losses) on change in
fair value of interest rate swaps
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss) to other income (expense), for settlement of
derivatives
Total derivative instruments
Other comprehensive income (loss)
Comprehensive income
Years Ended August 31,
2015
2014
2016
88,723 $
89,124 $
92,886
(1,702) $
(50,130) $
(8,089)
$
$
(182)
(20)
(202)
65
(291)
(226)
1,826
(2,598)
(2,361)
828
260
5
265
—
101
—
(535)
(2,439)
86,284 $
(100)
(1,870)
(52,226)
36,898 $
(88)
13
(7,811)
85,075
$
(1) Translation adjustments arising in translating the financial statements of a foreign entity have no effect on the income taxes
of that foreign entity. They may, however, affect: (a) the amount, measured in the parent entity's reporting currency, of
withholding taxes assessed on dividends paid to the parent entity and (b) the amount of taxes assessed on the parent entity
by the government of its country. The Company has determined that the reinvestment of earnings of its foreign subsidiaries
are indefinite because of the long-term nature of the Company's foreign investment plans. Therefore, deferred taxes are not
provided for on translation adjustments related to non-remitted earnings of the Company's foreign subsidiaries.
(2) See Note 12 - Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.
See accompanying notes.
42
—
—
9
4
0
,
1
8
4
)
3
7
7
,
4
(
8
1
1
0
4
9
,
7
)
4
4
1
,
1
2
(
6
8
8
,
2
9
)
1
1
8
,
7
(
5
6
2
,
8
4
5
)
7
7
6
,
4
(
—
—
9
4
5
7
1
,
7
4
2
1
,
9
8
)
6
2
1
,
1
2
(
)
6
2
2
,
2
5
(
4
8
5
,
6
6
5
)
4
3
3
,
3
(
—
—
0
8
1
3
7
,
9
3
2
7
,
8
8
)
9
3
4
,
2
(
)
4
7
2
,
1
2
(
1
7
0
,
8
3
6
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
$
)
7
4
9
,
9
1
(
)
3
7
7
,
4
(
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
$
)
0
2
7
,
4
2
(
)
7
7
6
,
4
(
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
$
)
7
9
3
,
9
2
(
)
4
3
3
,
3
(
1
5
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
$
1
4
7
2
5
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
$
3
9
7
3
4
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
$
)
1
3
7
,
2
3
(
$
6
3
8
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
6
8
8
,
2
9
)
4
4
1
,
1
2
(
3
1
6
,
5
1
2
—
4
2
1
,
9
8
)
6
2
1
,
1
2
(
1
1
6
,
3
8
2
—
—
—
—
—
—
3
2
7
,
8
8
)
4
7
2
,
1
2
(
0
6
0
,
1
5
3
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
)
1
1
8
7
(
,
$
)
6
8
2
9
4
(
,
)
6
2
2
2
5
(
,
$
,
)
2
1
5
1
0
1
(
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
)
9
3
4
2
(
,
$
,
)
1
5
9
3
0
1
(
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
9
8
4
1
,
$
5
0
5
9
,
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
6
0
2
1
,
—
—
—
8
1
1
1
5
4
6
,
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
4
2
)
2
(
5
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
9
4
—
—
—
9
6
9
5
,
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
3
3
)
9
(
3
—
—
—
—
$
,
0
5
1
7
9
3
$
3
$
1
5
9
,
0
3
.
s
e
t
o
n
g
n
i
y
n
a
p
m
o
c
c
a
e
e
S
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0
1
6
—
—
—
0
8
—
—
—
1
2
1
9
,
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
6
5
2
—
4
—
—
—
—
$
1
1
7
0
1
,
$
,
8
6
1
3
0
4
$
3
$
8
7
9
,
0
3
$
1
2
3
1
1
,
$
,
9
6
3
2
1
4
$
3
$
8
3
2
,
1
3
3
4
l
a
t
o
T
y
t
i
u
q
E
k
c
o
t
S
y
r
u
s
a
e
r
T
t
n
u
o
m
A
s
e
r
a
h
S
d
e
n
i
a
t
e
R
s
g
n
i
n
r
a
E
d
e
t
a
l
u
m
u
c
c
A
r
e
h
t
O
e
v
i
s
n
e
h
e
r
p
m
o
C
)
s
s
o
L
(
e
m
o
c
n
I
t
i
f
e
n
e
B
x
a
T
m
o
r
F
d
e
s
a
B
k
c
o
t
S
n
o
i
t
a
s
n
e
p
m
o
C
l
a
n
o
i
t
i
d
d
A
n
i
-
d
i
a
P
l
a
t
i
p
a
C
k
c
o
t
S
n
o
m
m
o
C
t
n
u
o
m
A
s
e
r
a
h
S
.
C
N
I
,
T
R
A
M
S
E
C
I
R
P
Y
T
I
U
Q
E
F
O
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S
D
E
T
A
D
I
L
O
S
N
O
C
)
S
D
N
A
S
U
O
H
T
N
I
S
T
N
U
O
M
A
(
$
0
9
6
1
7
8
,
3
4
1
$
)
5
7
4
1
4
(
,
$
6
1
0
8
,
$
,
1
8
5
0
9
3
$
3
$
4
2
9
,
0
3
s
d
r
a
w
a
k
c
o
t
s
d
e
t
c
i
r
t
s
e
r
f
o
e
r
u
t
i
e
f
r
o
F
s
r
e
d
l
o
h
k
c
o
t
s
o
t
d
i
a
p
d
n
e
d
i
v
i
D
n
o
i
t
a
s
n
e
p
m
o
c
d
e
s
a
b
-
k
c
o
t
S
s
n
o
i
t
p
o
k
c
o
t
s
f
o
e
s
i
c
r
e
x
E
e
m
o
c
n
i
t
e
N
)
s
s
o
l
(
e
m
o
c
n
i
e
v
i
s
n
e
h
e
r
p
m
o
c
r
e
h
t
O
s
d
r
a
w
a
k
c
o
t
s
d
e
t
c
i
r
t
s
e
r
f
o
e
r
u
t
i
e
f
r
o
F
d
r
a
w
a
k
c
o
t
s
d
e
t
c
i
r
t
s
e
r
f
o
e
c
n
a
u
s
s
I
4
1
0
2
,
1
3
t
s
u
g
u
A
t
a
e
c
n
a
l
a
B
k
c
o
t
s
y
r
u
s
a
e
r
t
f
o
e
s
a
h
c
r
u
P
s
r
e
d
l
o
h
k
c
o
t
s
o
t
d
i
a
p
d
n
e
d
i
v
i
D
n
o
i
t
a
s
n
e
p
m
o
c
d
e
s
a
b
-
k
c
o
t
S
s
n
o
i
t
p
o
k
c
o
t
s
f
o
e
s
i
c
r
e
x
E
e
m
o
c
n
i
t
e
N
)
s
s
o
l
(
e
m
o
c
n
i
e
v
i
s
n
e
h
e
r
p
m
o
c
r
e
h
t
O
s
d
r
a
w
a
k
c
o
t
s
d
e
t
c
i
r
t
s
e
r
f
o
e
r
u
t
i
e
f
r
o
F
d
r
a
w
a
k
c
o
t
s
d
e
t
c
i
r
t
s
e
r
f
o
e
c
n
a
u
s
s
I
5
1
0
2
,
1
3
t
s
u
g
u
A
t
a
e
c
n
a
l
a
B
k
c
o
t
s
y
r
u
s
a
e
r
t
f
o
e
s
a
h
c
r
u
P
)
s
s
o
l
(
e
m
o
c
n
i
e
v
i
s
n
e
h
e
r
p
m
o
c
r
e
h
t
O
6
1
0
2
,
1
3
t
s
u
g
u
A
t
a
e
c
n
a
l
a
B
s
r
e
d
l
o
h
k
c
o
t
s
o
t
d
i
a
p
d
n
e
d
i
v
i
D
n
o
i
t
a
s
n
e
p
m
o
c
d
e
s
a
b
-
k
c
o
t
S
s
n
o
i
t
p
o
k
c
o
t
s
f
o
e
s
i
c
r
e
x
E
e
m
o
c
n
i
t
e
N
3
1
0
2
,
1
3
t
s
u
g
u
A
t
a
e
c
n
a
l
a
B
k
c
o
t
s
y
r
u
s
a
e
r
t
f
o
e
s
a
h
c
r
u
P
k
c
o
t
s
d
e
t
c
i
r
t
s
e
r
f
o
e
c
n
a
u
s
s
I
PRICESMART, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)
Operating Activities:
Net income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities:
Depreciation and amortization
Allowance for doubtful accounts
(Gain)/loss on sale of property and equipment
Deferred income taxes
Excess tax benefit on stock-based compensation
Equity in (gains) losses of unconsolidated affiliates
Stock-based compensation
Proceeds from the settlement of derivatives
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
Receivables, prepaid expenses and other current assets, accrued salaries and
benefits, deferred membership income and other accruals
Merchandise inventories
Accounts payable
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
Investing Activities:
Additions to property and equipment
Deposits for land purchase option agreements
Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment
Capital contributions to joint ventures
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
Financing Activities:
Proceeds from long-term bank borrowings
Repayment of long-term bank borrowings
Proceeds from short-term bank borrowings
Repayment of short-term bank borrowings
Repayment of long-term debt with cross-currency interest rate swaps
Cash dividend payments
Release of restricted cash
Excess tax benefit on stock-based compensation
Purchase of treasury stock
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
Years Ended August 31,
2015
2016
2014
$
88,723 $
89,124 $
92,886
39,794
7
1,162
2,875
(610)
(332)
9,121
—
(8,348)
(15,732)
23,202
139,862
(77,700)
(442)
86
(119)
(78,175)
14,370
(16,525)
28,927
(19,314)
—
(21,274)
—
610
(3,334)
80
(16,460)
(2,777)
42,450
157,072
199,522 $
34,445
—
2,005
2,972
(1,206)
(94)
5,969
8,543
(6,886)
(40,792)
16,423
110,503
(89,185)
1,095
368
(1,360)
(89,082)
52,977
(30,905)
51,664
(42,143)
(24,000)
(21,126)
26,920
1,206
(4,677)
49
9,965
(11,412)
19,974
137,098
157,072 $
28,475
—
1,445
2,362
(1,489)
(9)
6,451
—
(11,676)
(8,970)
27,800
137,275
(118,101)
(850)
142
(750)
(119,559)
41,942
(23,756)
28,168
(28,172)
—
(21,144)
8,000
1,489
(4,773)
118
1,872
(4,364)
15,224
121,874
137,098
$
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest, net of amounts capitalized
Income taxes
$
$
4,903 $
51,238 $
6,093 $
44,174 $
3,765
44,261
See accompanying notes.
44
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 – COMPANY OVERVIEW AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
PriceSmart, Inc.’s (“PriceSmart,” the “Company,” or "we") business consists primarily of international membership
shopping warehouse clubs similar to, but smaller in size than, warehouse clubs in the United States. As of August 31, 2016, the
Company had 38 consolidated warehouse clubs in operation in 12 countries and one U.S. territory (six in Costa Rica and
Colombia; five in Panama; four in Trinidad; three in Guatemala, Honduras and the Dominican Republic; two in El Salvador and
Nicaragua; and one each in Aruba, Barbados, Jamaica, and the United States Virgin Islands), of which the Company owns 100%
of the corresponding legal entities (see Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies). In fiscal year 2014, the Company
purchased land in Pereira and Medellin, Colombia and leased land in the city of Bogota, Colombia. The Company built new
warehouse clubs on these three sites. During fiscal year 2015 the Company opened the Bogota location in October 2014 and the
Pereira and Medellin locations in November 2014. Together with the three warehouse clubs that were already operating in
Colombia (one in Barranquilla and two in Cali), these three new clubs brought the number of operating PriceSmart warehouse
clubs in Colombia to six at the end of fiscal year 2015. The Company constructed a new warehouse club on land acquired in
May 2015 in Chia, Colombia that opened in September 2016, fiscal year 2017 bringing the total of warehouse clubs operating in
Colombia to seven. In September 2014, the Company acquired land in La Chorrera ("Costa Verde"), west of Panama City,
Panama, on which the Company opened its fifth PriceSmart warehouse club in Panama in June 2015. In April 2015, the Company
acquired land in Managua, Nicaragua. The Company constructed and then opened a warehouse club on this site in
November 2015. On December 4, 2015, the Company signed an option to acquire two properties and then swap them for 59,353
square feet of land adjacent to our San Pedro Sula warehouse club in Honduras. The Company exercised this option and
completed the swap during May 2016. The Company will use the acquired land to expand the parking lot for the San Pedro Sula
warehouse club.
The Company continues to explore other potential sites for future warehouse clubs in Central America, the Caribbean
and Colombia. The warehouse club sales and membership sign-ups experienced with the opening of warehouse clubs in Colombia
have reinforced the Company's belief that Colombia could be a market for additional PriceSmart warehouse clubs in other
Colombian cities.
Basis of Presentation - The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of PriceSmart, Inc., a Delaware
corporation, and its subsidiaries. Intercompany transactions between the Company and its subsidiaries have been eliminated in
consolidation.
Reclassifications to consolidated balance sheet recorded during fiscal year 2016 for fiscal year 2015 – Certain
reclassifications to the consolidated balance sheet have been made to prior fiscal year amounts to conform to the presentation in
the current fiscal year.
The Company early adopted ASU 2015-17 as of the second quarter of fiscal year 2016 with retrospective application to
prior periods. Accordingly, the Company reclassified current deferred tax assets and liabilities to long-term on its consolidated
balance sheet for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2015, which increased long-term deferred tax assets by $7.4 million and
decreased long-term deferred tax liabilities by $438,000. As of the third quarter of fiscal year 2016, the Company no longer
refers to these as Deferred tax assets-long term and Deferred tax liabilities-long term, and rather identifies them as Deferred tax
assets and Deferred tax liabilities on the balance sheet.
August 31, 2015
balance sheet line item
as previously reported
Amount
reclassified
August 31, 2015
balance sheet line item
as currently reported
—
14,845
—
1,755
(7,849) $
7,381 $
(30) $
(438) $
Deferred tax assets- current
Deferred tax assets - non-current
Deferred tax liabilities - current
Deferred tax liabilities - non-current
$
$
$
$
7,849 $
7,464 $
30 $
2,193 $
45
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Principles of Consolidation – The consolidated financial statements of the Company included herein include the assets,
liabilities and results of operations of the Company’s wholly owned subsidiaries and the investments and operating results of
joint ventures recorded under the equity method. All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated
in consolidation. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company pursuant to the rules and regulations
of the SEC and reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) that are, in the opinion of management,
necessary to fairly present the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows for the periods presented. As of August 31,
2016, all of the Company's subsidiaries were wholly owned. Additionally, the Company's ownership interest in real estate
development joint ventures as of August 31, 2016 is listed below:
Real Estate Development Joint Ventures
GolfPark Plaza, S.A.
Price Plaza Alajuela PPA, S.A.
Countries
Panama
Costa Rica
Ownership
50.0 %
50.0 %
Basis of
Presentation
Equity(1)
Equity(1)
(1) Joint venture interests are recorded as investment in unconsolidated affiliates on the consolidated balance sheets.
Use of Estimates – The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying
notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Variable Interest Entities – The Company reviews and determines at the start of each arrangement, or subsequently if
a reconsideration event occurs, whether any of its investments in joint ventures constitute a Variable Interest Entity (“VIE”) and
whether it must consolidate a VIE and/or disclose information about its involvement in a VIE. The Company has determined that
the joint ventures for GolfPark Plaza, S.A. and Plaza Price Alajuela PPA, S.A. are VIEs. The Company has determined that it is
not the primary beneficiary of the VIEs and, therefore, has accounted for these entities under the equity method.
Cash and Cash Equivalents – Cash and cash equivalents represent cash and short-term investments with maturities of
three months or less when purchased and proceeds due from credit and debit card transactions, which are generally settled within
a few days of the underlying transaction.
Restricted Cash – The changes in restricted cash are disclosed within the consolidated statement of cash flows based
on the nature of the restriction. The following table summarizes the restricted cash reported by the Company (in thousands):
Short-term restricted cash:
Restricted cash for land purchase option agreements
Short-term restricted cash
Total short-term restricted cash
August 31,
August 31,
2016
2015
$
$
442
76
518
$
$
—
61
61
Long-term restricted cash:
Other long-term restricted cash (1)
1,464
1,464
Total long-term restricted cash
Total restricted cash
1,525
(1) The other restricted cash consists mainly of cash deposits held within banking institutions in compliance with federal
2,676
2,676
3,194
$
$
$
$
$
$
regulatory requirements in Costa Rica and Panama.
Tax Receivables – The Company pays Value Added Tax (“VAT”) or similar taxes (“input VAT”), income taxes, and
other taxes within the normal course of its business in most of the countries in which it operates related to the procurement of
merchandise and/or services it acquires and/or on sales and taxable income. The Company also collects VAT or similar taxes on
behalf of the government (“output VAT”) for merchandise and/or services it sells. If the output VAT exceeds the input VAT,
then the difference is remitted to the government, usually on a monthly basis. If the input VAT exceeds the output VAT, this
creates a VAT receivable. In most countries where the Company operates, the governments have implemented additional
collection procedures, such as requiring credit card processors to remit a portion of sales processed via credit card directly to the
government as advance payments of VAT and/or income tax. In the case of VAT, these procedures alter the natural offset of
input and output VAT and generally leave the Company with a net VAT receivable, forcing the Company to process significant
46
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
refund claims on a recurring basis. With respect to income taxes paid, if the estimated income taxes paid or withheld exceed the
actual income tax due, this creates an income tax receivable. The Company either requests a refund of these tax receivables or
applies the balance to expected future tax payments. These refund or offset processes can take anywhere from several months to
several years to complete.
In most countries where the Company operates, the tax refund process is defined and structured with regular refunds or
offsets. However, in three countries there is either not a clearly defined process or the governments have alleged there is not a
clearly defined process to allow the authorities to refund VAT receivables. The Company, together with its tax and legal advisers,
is currently appealing these interpretations in court and expects to prevail. In one of these countries, where there is favorable
jurisprudence, the government performed an audit to verify the amount of the VAT receivables as a required precursor to any
refund. The balance of the VAT receivables in these countries was $7.6 million and $6.5 million as of August 31, 2016 and
August 31, 2015, respectively. In another country in which the Company has warehouse clubs, a new minimum income tax
mechanism took effect in fiscal year 2015, which requires the Company to pay taxes based on a percentage of sales rather than
income. As a result, the Company is making income tax payments substantially in excess of those it would expect to pay based
on taxable income. The current rules (which the Company has challenged in court) do not clearly allow the Company to obtain
a refund or to offset this excess income tax against other taxes. As of August 31, 2016, the Company had deferred tax assets of
approximately $1.9 million in this country. Also, the Company had an income tax receivable balance of $2.5 million as of August
31, 2016 related to excess payments from fiscal years 2015 and 2016. The Company has not placed any type of allowance on
the recoverability of these tax receivables or deferred tax assets, because the Company believes that it is more likely than not that
it will succeed in its refund request and/or court challenge on this matter.
The Company's policy for classification and presentation of VAT receivables, income tax receivables and other tax
receivables is as follows:
(cid:120)
Short-term VAT and Income tax receivables, recorded as Other current assets: This classification is used for any
countries where the Company's subsidiary has generally demonstrated the ability to recover the VAT or income tax
receivable within one year. The Company also classifies as short-term any approved refunds or credit notes to the extent
that the Company expects to receive the refund or use the credit notes within one year.
(cid:120) Long-term VAT and Income tax receivables, recorded as Other non-current assets: This classification is used for
amounts not approved for refund or credit in countries where the Company's subsidiary has not demonstrated the ability
to obtain refunds within one year and/or for amounts which are subject to outstanding disputes. An allowance is provided
against VAT and income tax receivable balances in dispute when the Company does not expect to eventually prevail in
its recovery.
The following table summarizes the VAT receivables reported by the Company (in thousands):
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
Other non-current assets
Total amount of VAT receivable reported
August 31,
2016
August 31,
2015
$
$
1,635 $
32,502
34,137 $
4,673
22,239
26,912
The following table summarizes the Income tax receivables reported by the Company (in thousands):
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
Other non-current assets
Total amount of income tax receivable reported
August 31,
2016
August 31,
2015
$
$
6,402 $
10,376
16,778 $
2,941
8,772
11,713
Lease Accounting – Certain of the Company's operating leases where the Company is the lessee (see "Revenue
Recognition Policy" for lessor accounting) provide for minimum annual payments that increase over the life of the lease. The
aggregate minimum annual payments are expensed on the straight-line basis beginning when the Company takes possession of
the property and extending over the term of the related lease including renewal options when the exercise of the option is
reasonably assured as an economic penalty may be incurred if the option is not exercised. The amount by which straight-line rent
exceeds actual lease payment requirements in the early years of the leases is accrued as deferred rent and reduced in later years
when the actual cash payment requirements exceed the straight-line expense. The Company also accounts in its straight-line
47
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
computation for the effect of any “rental holidays” and lessor-paid tenant improvements. In addition to the minimum annual
payments, in certain locations, the Company pays additional contingent rent based on a contractually stipulated percentage of
sales.
Merchandise Inventories – Merchandise inventories, which include merchandise for resale, are valued at the lower of
cost (average cost) or market. The Company provides for estimated inventory losses and obsolescence between physical inventory
counts on the basis of a percentage of sales. The provision is adjusted periodically to reflect the trend of actual physical inventory
count results, with physical inventories occurring primarily in the second and fourth fiscal quarters. In addition, the Company
may be required to take markdowns below the carrying cost of certain inventory to expedite the sale of such merchandise.
Fair Value Measurements – The Company measures the fair value for all financial and nonfinancial assets and
liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the consolidated financial statements on a recurring or nonrecurring
basis. The fair value of an asset is the price at which the asset could be sold in an orderly transaction between unrelated,
knowledgeable and willing parties able to engage in the transaction. A liability’s fair value is defined as the amount that would
be paid to transfer the liability to a new obligor in a transaction between such parties, not the amount that would be paid to settle
the liability with the creditor.
The Company has established a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring and
revaluing fair value. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; Level 2,
defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3, defined
as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions. The
Company was not required to revalue any assets or liabilities utilizing Level 1 or Level 3 inputs at the balance sheet dates. The
Company's Level 2 assets and liabilities revalued at the balance sheet dates, on a recurring basis, primarily included cash flow
hedges (interest rate swaps and cross-currency interest rate swaps) and forward foreign exchange contracts. In addition, the
Company utilizes Level 2 inputs in determining the fair value of long-term debt. The Company has elected not to revalue long-
term debt because this debt will be settled at the carrying value and not at the fair market value. The Company did not make any
significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value tiers during the periods reported on herein.
Nonfinancial assets and liabilities are revalued and recognized at fair value subsequent to initial recognition when there
is evidence of impairment. For the periods reported, no impairment of such nonfinancial assets was recorded.
The disclosure of fair value of certain financial assets and liabilities recorded at cost is as follows:
Cash and cash equivalents: The carrying value approximates fair value due to the short maturity of these instruments.
Short-term restricted cash: The carrying value approximates fair value due to the short maturity of these instruments.
Long-term restricted cash: Long-term restricted cash primarily consists of auto renewable 3-12 month certificates of
deposit, which are held as collateral against our long-term debt. The carrying value approximates fair value due to the
maturity of the underlying certificates of deposit within the normal operating cycle of the Company.
Accounts receivable: The carrying value approximates fair value due to the short maturity of these accounts.
Short-term VAT and Income tax receivables: The carrying value approximates fair value due to the short maturity of
these accounts.
Long-term VAT and Income tax receivables: The fair value of long-term receivables would normally be measured using
a discounted cash flow analysis based on the current market interest rates for similar types of financial instruments, with
an estimate of the time these receivables are expected to be outstanding. The Company is not able to provide an estimate
on the time these receivables, owed to the Company by various government agencies, are expected to be outstanding;
therefore, the Company has not presented a fair value on the long-term VAT and Income tax receivables.
Short-term debt: The carrying value approximates fair value due to the short maturity of these instruments.
Long-term debt: The fair value of debt is generally measured using a discounted cash flow analysis based on current
market interest rates for similar types of financial instruments. These inputs are not quoted prices in active markets but
48
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
they are either directly or indirectly observable; therefore, they are classified as Level 2 inputs. The carrying value and
fair value of the Company’s debt as of August 31, 2016 and August 31, 2015 is as follows (in thousands):
August 31, 2016
August 31, 2015
Carrying
Value
Fair
Value(1)
Carrying
Value
Fair
Value
Long-term debt, including current portion
$
88,107 $
85,654 $
90,534 $
88,307
(1) The Company has disclosed the fair value of long-term debt, including debt for which it has entered into cross-currency
interest rate swaps, using the derivative obligation as of August 31, 2016 to estimate the fair value of long-term debt, which
includes the effects that the cross-currency interest rate swaps have had on the fair value of long-term debt.
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities – The Company uses derivative financial instruments for hedging and
non-trading purposes to manage its exposure to changes in interest rates and currency exchange rates. In using derivative financial
instruments for the purpose of hedging the Company’s exposure to interest rates and currency exchange rate risks, the contractual
terms of a hedged instrument closely mirror those of the hedged item, providing a high degree of risk reduction and correlation.
Contracts that are effective at meeting the risk reduction and correlation criteria (effective hedge) are recorded using hedge
accounting. If a derivative financial instrument is an effective hedge, changes in the fair value of the instrument will be offset
in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) until the hedged item completes its contractual term. If any portion of the
hedge is deemed ineffective, the change in fair value of the hedged assets or liabilities will be immediately recognized in earnings
during the period. Instruments that do not meet the criteria for hedge accounting, or contracts for which the Company has not
elected hedge accounting, are valued at fair value with unrealized gains or losses reported in earnings during the period of the
change. Valuation techniques utilized in the fair value measurement of assets and liabilities presented on the Company’s
consolidated balance sheets were not changed from previous practice during the reporting period. The Company seeks to manage
counterparty risk associated with these contracts by limiting transactions to counterparties with which the Company has an
established banking relationship. There can be no assurance, however, that this practice effectively mitigates counterparty risk.
Cash Flow Instruments. The Company is a party to receive floating interest rate, pay fixed-rate interest rate swaps to
hedge the interest rate risk of certain U.S. dollar denominated debt within its international subsidiaries. The swaps are designated
as cash flow hedges of interest expense risk. These instruments are considered effective hedges and are recorded using hedge
accounting. The Company is also a party to receive variable interest rate, pay fixed interest rate cross-currency interest rate
swaps to hedge the interest rate and currency exposure associated with the expected payments of principal and interest of U.S.
denominated debt within its international subsidiaries whose functional currency is other than the U.S dollar. The swaps are
designated as cash flow hedges of the currency risk related to payments on the U.S. denominated debt. These instruments are
also considered to be effective hedges and are recorded using hedge accounting. Under cash flow hedging, the effective portion
of the fair value of the derivative, calculated as the net present value of the future cash flows, is deferred on the consolidated
balance sheets in accumulated other comprehensive loss. If any portion of an interest rate swap is determined to be an ineffective
hedge, the gains or losses from changes in fair value would be recorded directly in the consolidated statements of income.
Amounts recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss are released to earnings in the same period that the hedged
transaction impacts consolidated earnings. See Note 12 - Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities for information on the
fair value of interest rate swaps and cross-currency interest rate swaps as of August 31, 2016 and August 31, 2015.
Fair Value Instruments. The Company is exposed to foreign-currency exchange rate fluctuations in the normal course
of business. The Company is also exposed to foreign-currency exchange rate fluctuations on U.S. dollar- denominated liabilities
within its international subsidiaries whose functional currency is other than the U.S. dollar. The Company manages these
fluctuations, in part, through the use of non-deliverable forward foreign-exchange contracts that are intended to offset changes in
cash flow attributable to currency exchange movements. The contracts are intended primarily to economically address exposure
to U.S. dollar merchandise inventory expenditures made by the Company’s international subsidiaries whose functional currency
is other than the U.S. dollar. Currently, these contracts are treated for accounting purposes as fair value instruments and do not
qualify for derivative hedge accounting, and as such the Company does not apply derivative hedge accounting to record these
transactions. As a result, these contracts are valued at fair value with unrealized gains or losses reported in earnings during the
period of the change. The Company seeks to mitigate foreign-currency exchange-rate risk with the use of these contracts and
does not intend to engage in speculative transactions. These contracts do not contain any credit-risk-related contingent features
and are limited to less than one year in duration. See Note 12 - Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities for information on
the fair value of open, unsettled forward foreign-exchange contracts as of August 31, 2016 and August 31, 2015.
Early Settlement of Derivative Instruments Qualifying for Hedge Accounting. During the fourth quarter of fiscal year
2015, the Company's Colombia subsidiary paid off the outstanding principal balance of U.S. $24.0 million on loan agreements
that were entered into by the subsidiary with Scotiabank & Trust (Cayman) Ltd before the scheduled loan payment dates. The
Company's Colombia subsidiary also settled the cross-currency interest rate swaps that it had entered into with the Bank of Nova
49
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Scotia ("Scotia Bank") related to these loans during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2015. As indicated above, for a derivative
instrument to qualify for cash flow hedge accounting there must be an expectation that the derivative instrument will be highly
effective in achieving offsetting cash flows attributable to the hedged risk during the term of the hedge. As part of the
determination that a derivative instrument is highly effective at offsetting the exposure, the Company must determine that that
the forecasted transaction will occur; therefore, an entity's past ability to accurately predict forecasted transactions should be
considered when determining if a hedged transaction qualifies for cash flow hedge accounting. To the extent an entity has
developed a pattern of changing the probability of occurrence of forecasted transactions, the ability of the entity to accurately
predict foretasted transactions and the propriety of using hedge accounting in the future for similar forecasted transactions would
be called into question. The Company believes that the settlements of these derivatives does not demonstrate such a pattern and
does not disqualify the Company from the application of hedge accounting for the remaining hedging instruments and underlying
loans whose terms and conditions remain unchanged. The Company classifies cash payments or proceeds from termination of
derivatives as net cash provided by (used in) operating activities within the consolidated statements of cash flows.
The following table summarizes financial assets and liabilities measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring basis
in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of August 31, 2016 and August 31, 2015 (in thousands) for derivatives that qualify
for hedge accounting:
Assets and Liabilities as of August 31, 2016
Other non-current assets – (Cross-currency interest rate
swaps)
Other long-term liabilities – (Interest rate swaps)
Other long-term liabilities – (Cross-currency interest
rate swaps)
Total
$
$
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Total
— $
—
—
— $
3,224 $
(448)
(1,066)
1,710 $
— $
—
—
— $
3,224
(448)
(1,066)
1,710
Assets and Liabilities as of August 31, 2015
Other non-current assets – (Cross-currency interest rate
swaps)
Other long-term liabilities – (Interest rate swaps)
Other long-term liabilities – (Cross-currency interest
rate swaps)
Total
$
$
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Total
— $
—
—
— $
4,129 $
(387)
(1,312)
2,430 $
— $
—
—
— $
4,129
(387)
(1,312)
2,430
The following tables summarize financial assets and liabilities measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring basis
in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of August 31, 2016 and August 31, 2015 (in thousands) for derivatives that do
not qualify for hedge accounting:
Assets and Liabilities as of August 31, 2016
Other accrued expenses (Foreign currency forward
contracts)
Net fair value of derivatives designated as hedging
instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Total
— $
(110) $
— $
(110)
— $
(110) $
— $
(110)
$
$
50
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Assets and Liabilities as of August 31, 2015
Other accrued expenses (Foreign currency forward
contracts)
Net fair value of derivatives designated as hedging
instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
$
$
— $
(66) $
— $
— $
(66) $
— $
Total
(66)
(66)
Goodwill – The table below presents goodwill resulting from certain business combinations as of August 31, 2016 and
August 31, 2015 (in thousands). The change in goodwill is a result of foreign exchange translation losses.
Goodwill
August 31,
2016
August 31,
2015
Change
$
35,637 $
35,871 $
(234)
The Company reviews goodwill at the reporting unit for impairment. The Company first reviews qualitative factors for
each reporting unit in determining if an annual goodwill test is required. If the Company's review of qualitative factors indicates
a requirement for a test of goodwill impairment, because it is more likely than not that an impairment of goodwill may exist, the
Company then will assess whether the carrying amount of a reporting unit is greater than the estimated fair value. If the carrying
amount of a reporting unit is greater than zero and its estimated fair value exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting
unit is considered not impaired. If either the carrying amount of the reporting unit is not greater than zero or if the carrying amount
of the entity exceeds its estimated fair value, the Company performs a second test to determine whether goodwill has been
impaired and to calculate the amount of that impairment. The Company was not required to perform the second step for any
reporting units in 2016 or 2015.
Revenue Recognition – The Company recognizes merchandise sales revenue when title passes to the customer.
Membership income represents annual membership fees paid by the Company’s warehouse club members, which are recognized
ratably over the 12-month term of the membership. Membership refunds are prorated over the remaining term of the membership;
accordingly, no refund reserve is required to be established for the periods presented. The Company recognizes and presents
revenue-producing transactions on a net of value added/sales tax basis.
The Company began offering Platinum memberships in Costa Rica during fiscal year 2013, which provide members
with a 2% rebate on most items, up to an annual maximum of $500.00. Platinum members can apply this rebate to future
purchases at the warehouse club at the end of the annual membership period. The Company records this 2% rebate as a reduction
of revenue at the time of the sales transaction. Accordingly, the Company has reduced warehouse sales and has accrued a liability
within other accrued expenses. The rebate is issued annually to Platinum members on March 1 and expires August 31. Any
rebate amount not redeemed by August 31 is recognized as breakage revenue. The Company periodically reviews expired unused
rebates outstanding, and the expired unused rebates are recognized as Revenues: Other income on the consolidated statements of
income. The Company has determined that breakage revenue is insignificant; therefore, it records 100% of the Platinum
membership liability at the time of sale, rather than estimating breakage.
The Company recognizes gift certificate sales revenue when the certificates are redeemed. The outstanding gift
certificates are reflected as other accrued expenses in the consolidated balance sheets. These gift certificates generally have a
one-year stated expiration date from the date of issuance. However, the absence of a large volume of transactions for gift
certificates impairs the Company's ability to make a reasonable estimate of the redemption levels for gift certificates; therefore,
the Company assumes a 100% redemption rate prior to expiration of the gift certificate. The Company periodically reviews
unredeemed outstanding gift certificates, and the gift certificates that have expired are recognized as Revenues: Other income on
the consolidated statements of income.
Operating leases, where the Company is the lessor, with lease payments that have fixed and determinable rent increases
are recognized as revenue on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The Company also accounts in its straight-line computation
for the effect of any "rental holidays." Contingent rental revenue is recognized as the contingent rent becomes due per the
individual lease agreements.
Insurance Reimbursements – Receipts from insurance reimbursements up to the amount of the losses recognized are
considered recoveries. These recoveries are accounted for when they are probable of receipt. Insurance recoveries are not
recognized prior to the recognition of the related cost. Anticipated proceeds in excess of the amount of loss recognized are
51
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
considered a gains and are subject to gain contingency guidance. Anticipated proceeds in excess of a loss recognized in the
financial statements are not be recognized until all contingencies related to the insurance claim are resolved.
The Company’s Guatemala Pradera warehouse club experienced a fire in its merchandise receiving department during
the early morning hours of June 4, 2015. No members or employees were in the warehouse club at the time. The fire was
extinguished, but caused considerable smoke and some fire damage. The warehouse club was closed for nine days and reopened
on June 13, 2015. The Company is insured for these costs and filed an insurance claim with its insurance provider. During the
quarter ended August 31, 2015, the Company recorded an initial receivable of approximately $2.8 million against the expected
insurance payment related to expenses associated with the write off of inventory, equipment disposals, building repairs, other
associated costs recognized related to the fire and for current replacement costs for assets lost in the fire in excess of the net book
value (disposal cost). The Company received as of August 31, 2015 approximately $300,000 in payments against the claim filed
and the receivable recorded. Of this amount, approximately $76,000 was recorded as a gain on disposal of assets, as proceeds
received from the insurance reimbursement were in excess of the amount of loss recognized on the disposal of assets. Additionally,
the Company recorded approximately $28,000 for the disposal of assets damaged during the fire, for which it had not yet been
reimbursed. As of August 31, 2015, the Company's receivable related to this insurance claim was approximately $2.6 million.
The Company’s insurance policy also addresses coverage for business interruption. During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2015,
the Company filed a claim with its insurance carrier for approximately $332,000 related to business interruption for which the
Company did not record a receivable. Insurance proceeds for reimbursements related to business interruptions are considered
gain contingencies and are not recognized in the financial statements until the period in which all contingencies are resolved and
the gain is realized. During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2015, the Company expensed to cost of goods sold, net warehouse
club expenses of approximately $165,000 related to the write off of inventory not covered by insurance. Additionally, the
Company expensed to selling, general and administrative expenses approximately $34,000 in salaries related to the clean up and
preparation of the warehouse club for reopening.
The Company received the final insurance settlement payments of approximately $3.1 million during the quarter ended
November 30, 2015. As a result, the Company recorded a credit to cost of goods sold of approximately $165,000 during the
period that reflects the reversal of the inventory written off previously and now covered under the claim and gain on the disposal
of assets for $85,000 that included reimbursement from the insurance for assets disposed of in fiscal year 2015. Additionally, the
Company recorded during the quarter ended November 30, 2015 other income from insurance proceeds of approximately
$202,000 during the period that reflects the amount reimbursed to the Company for business interruption coverage, net of taxes
and other miscellaneous amounts charged to the Company by the insurance company for storage of the damaged inventory.
Cost of Goods Sold – The Company includes the cost of merchandise, food service and bakery raw materials, and one
hour photo supplies in cost of goods sold. The Company also includes in cost of goods sold the external and internal distribution
and handling costs for supplying merchandise, raw materials and supplies to the warehouse clubs. External costs include inbound
freight, duties, drayage, fees, insurance, and non-recoverable value-added tax related to inventory shrink, spoilage and damage.
Internal costs include payroll and related costs, utilities, consumable supplies, repair and maintenance, rent expense, building and
equipment depreciation at the Company's distribution facilities and payroll and other direct costs for in store demonstrations.
Vendor consideration consists primarily of volume rebates, time-limited product promotions, slotting fees,
demonstration reimbursements and prompt payment discounts. Volume rebates that are not threshold based are incorporated into
the unit cost of merchandise reducing the inventory cost and cost of goods sold. Volume rebates that are threshold based are
recorded as a reduction to cost of goods sold when the Company achieves established purchase levels that are confirmed by the
vendor in writing or upon receipt of funds. On a quarterly basis, the Company calculates the amount of rebates recorded in cost
of goods sold that relates to inventory on hand and this amount is reclassified as a reduction to inventory, if significant. Product
promotions are generally linked to coupons that provide for reimbursement to the Company from vendor rebates for the product
being promoted. Slotting fees are related to consideration received by the Company from vendors for preferential "end cap"
placement of the vendor's products within the warehouse club. Demonstration reimbursements are related to consideration
received by the Company from vendors for the in store promotion of the vendors' products. The Company records the reduction
in cost of goods sold on a transactional basis for these programs. Prompt payment discounts are taken in substantially all cases,
and therefore, are applied directly to reduce the acquisition cost of the related inventory, with the resulting effect recorded to cost
of goods sold when the inventory is sold.
Selling, General and Administrative – Selling, general and administrative costs are comprised primarily of expenses
associated with warehouse operations. Warehouse operations include the operating costs of the Company's warehouse clubs,
including all payroll and related costs, utilities, consumable supplies, repair and maintenance, rent expense, building and
equipment depreciation, and bank and credit card processing fees. Also included in selling, general and administrative expenses
are the payroll and related costs for the Company's U.S. and regional purchasing and management centers.
Pre-Opening Costs – The Company expenses pre-opening costs (the costs of start-up activities, including organization
costs and rent) as incurred.
52
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Asset Impairment Costs – The Company periodically evaluates its long-lived assets for indicators of impairment.
Management's judgments are based on market and operational conditions at the time of the evaluation and can include
management's best estimate of future business activity. These periodic evaluations could cause management to conclude that
impairment factors exist, requiring an adjustment of these assets to their then-current fair value. Future business conditions and/or
activity could differ materially from the projections made by management causing the need for additional impairment charges.
Contingencies and Litigation – The Company records and reserves for loss contingencies if (a) information available
prior to issuance of the consolidated financial statements indicates that it is probable that an asset had been impaired or a liability
had been incurred at the date of the consolidated financial statements and (b) the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. If
one or both criteria for accrual are not met, but there is at least a reasonable possibility that a loss will occur, the Company does
not record and reserve for a loss contingency but describes the contingency within a note and provides detail, when possible, of
the estimated potential loss or range of loss. If an estimate cannot be made, a statement to that effect is made.
Foreign Currency Translation – The assets and liabilities of the Company’s foreign operations are translated to U.S.
dollars when the functional currency in the Company’s international subsidiaries is the local currency and not U.S. dollars. Assets
and liabilities of these foreign subsidiaries are translated to U.S. dollars at the exchange rate on the balance sheet date, and
revenue, costs and expenses are translated at average rates of exchange in effect during the period. The corresponding translation
gains and losses are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income or loss. These adjustments will affect
net income upon the sale or liquidation of the underlying investment. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in currencies
other than the functional currency of the respective entity (primarily U.S. dollars) are revalued to the functional currency using
the exchange rate on the balance sheet date. These foreign exchange transaction gains (losses), including transactions recorded
involving these monetary assets and liabilities, are recorded as Other income (expense) in the consolidated statements of income.
The following table summarizes the amounts recorded for the twelve month periods ending August 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014 (in
thousands):
Currency gain (loss)
Years Ended August 31,
2016
2015
2014
$
(899) $
(4,388) $
984
Income Taxes – The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method. Under the asset and
liability method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributed to differences between
the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary
differences and carry-forwards are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change
in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is established when
necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to amounts expected to be realized.
The Company and its subsidiaries are required to file federal and state income tax returns in the United States and various
other tax returns in foreign jurisdictions. The preparation of these tax returns requires the Company to interpret the applicable tax
laws and regulations in effect in such jurisdictions, which could affect the amount of tax paid by the Company. The Company, in
consultation with its tax advisors, bases its tax returns on interpretations that are believed to be reasonable under the
circumstances. The tax returns, however, are subject to routine reviews by the various federal, state and foreign taxing authorities
in the jurisdictions in which the Company or one of its subsidiaries files tax returns. As part of these reviews, a taxing authority
may disagree with respect to the income tax positions taken by the Company (“uncertain tax positions”) and, therefore, require
the Company or one of its subsidiaries to pay additional taxes.
The Company accrues an amount for its estimate of probable additional income tax liability. In certain cases, the impact
of an uncertain income tax position on the income tax return must be recognized at the largest amount that is more-likely-than-
not to be sustained upon audit by the relevant tax authority. An uncertain income tax position will not be recognized if it has less
than 50% likelihood of being sustained. This requires significant judgment, the use of estimates, and the interpretation and
application of complex tax laws. When facts and circumstances change, the Company reassesses these probabilities and records
any changes in the consolidated financial statements as appropriate. There were no material changes in the Company's uncertain
income tax positions for the periods ended on August 31, 2016 and August 31, 2015. During the first quarter of fiscal year 2015,
one of the Company’s subsidiaries received provisional assessments claiming $2.5 million of taxes, penalties and interest related
to withholding taxes on certain charges for services rendered by the Company. In addition, this subsidiary received provisional
assessments totaling $5.1 million for lack of deductibility of the underlying service charges due to the lack of withholding. Based
on a review of the Company's tax advisers' interpretation of local law, rulings and jurisprudence (including Supreme Court
precedents with respect to the deductibility assessment), the Company expects to prevail in both instances and has not recorded
a provision for these assessments. Also, in another country, beginning in fiscal year 2015, a new minimum income tax mechanism
53
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
took effect, which requires the Company to pay taxes based on a percentage of sales rather than income. As a result, the Company
is making income tax payments substantially in excess of those it would expect to pay based on taxable income. The current rules
(which the Company has appealed) do not clearly allow the Company to obtain a refund or offset this excess income tax against
other taxes. As of August 31, 2016, the Company had deferred tax assets of approximately $1.9 million in this country. Also,
the Company had an income tax receivable balance of $2.5 million as of August 31, 2016 related to excess payments from fiscal
years 2015 and 2016. The Company has not placed any type of allowance on the recoverability of these tax receivables or
deferred income taxes, because the Company believes that it is more likely than not that it will succeed in its appeal on the matter.
The Company has not provided for U.S. deferred taxes on cumulative non-U.S. undistributed earnings as such earnings
are deemed by the Company to be indefinitely reinvested. It is not practicable to determine the U.S. federal income tax liability
that would be associated with such earnings because of the complexity of the computation.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
FASB ASC 740 ASU 2016-16- Income Taxes (Topic 740)—Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory
In October 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”)
No. 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740)—Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory. Currently U.S. GAAP, prohibits
recognizing current and deferred income tax consequences for an intra-entity asset transfer until the asset has been sold to an
outside party. ASU 2016-16 states that an entity should recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an
asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs.
The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods
within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted. The amendments should be applied on a modified retrospective basis
through a cumulative-effect adjustment directly to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. The Company
will evaluate the impact adoption of this guidance may have on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
FASB ASC 230 ASU 2016-15- Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230)—Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments
(a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force)
In August 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic
230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. This ASU addresses stakeholders’ concerns regarding diversity
in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows under Topic
230, Statement of Cash Flows, and other Topics. In particular, ASU No. 2016-15 addresses eight specific cash flow issues in an
effort to reduce this diversity in practice: (1) debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs; (2) settlement of zero-coupon bonds;
(3) contingent consideration payments made after a business combination; (4) proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims;
(5) proceeds from the settlement of corporate-owned life insurance policies, including bank-owned life insurance policies; (6)
distributions received from equity method investees; (7) beneficial interests in securitization transactions; and (8) separately
identifiable cash flows and application of the predominance principle.
The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods
within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted. The Company will evaluate the impact adoption of this guidance may
have on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
FASB ASC 718 ASU 2016-09-Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based
Payment Accounting
In March, 2016, the FASB issued amendments to the guidance on employee share-based payment accounting intended
to improve the accounting for employee share-based payments. This ASU simplifies several aspects of the accounting for share-
based payment award transactions, including:
(cid:120) The income tax consequences
(cid:120) Classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and
(cid:120) Classification on the statement of cash flows
The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and interim periods
within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted for any organization in any interim or annual period. The Company will
evaluate the impact adoption of this guidance may have on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
FASB ASC 405 ASU 2016-04 Liabilities-Extinguishments of Liabilities (Subtopic 405-20): Recognition of Breakage for Certain
Prepaid Stored-Value Cards
54
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
On March 8, 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-04, Recognition of Breakage for Certain
Prepaid Stored-Value Products, a consensus of the FASB’s Emerging Issues Task Force. The new guidance creates an exception
under ASC 405-20, Liabilities – Extinguishments of Liabilities, to derecognize financial liabilities related to certain prepaid
stored-value products using a revenue-like breakage model.
Prepaid stored-value products are products with stored monetary value that can be redeemed for goods, services, and/or
cash (e.g., gift cards). The issuers frequently experience breakage whereby consumers do not redeem the entire balance of their
prepaid stored-value cards.
The new guidance requires issuers that record financial liabilities related to prepaid stored-value products to follow the
same breakage model required by ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers for non-financial liabilities. If an entity
expects to be entitled to a breakage amount for a liability resulting from the sale of a prepaid stored-value card, the entity shall
derecognize the amount related to the expected breakage in proportion to the pattern of rights expected to be exercised by the
card holder only to the extent that it is probable that a significant reversal of the recognized breakage amount will not subsequently
occur. If an entity does not expect to be entitled to a breakage amount for prepaid stored-value cards, the entity shall derecognize
the amount related to breakage when the likelihood of the customer exercising its remaining rights becomes remote.
The amendments in this ASU are effective on a prospective or retrospective basis for public entities for fiscal years and
interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted. The Company will
evaluate the impact adoption of this guidance may have on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
FASB ASC 842 ASU 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842): Amendments to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification
In February 2016, the FASB issued amendments to the guidance on lease accounting. Under the new guidance, for all
leases longer than 12 months, a lessee will be required to record a lease liability for all payments arising from a lease and also
record a right of use asset for the term of the lease. Under the new guidance lessor accounting is largely unchanged.
The amendment in this ASU is effective on a modified retrospective basis for public entities for fiscal years and interim
periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The Company will evaluate
the impact adoption of this guidance may have on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
FASB ASC 740 ASU 2015-17 Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes
In November 2015, the FASB issued amended guidance eliminating the requirement for organizations to present
deferred tax liabilities and assets as current and noncurrent in a classified balance sheet. Instead, organizations will be required
to classify all deferred tax assets and liabilities as noncurrent.
The amendment in this ASU is effective on a prospective or retrospective basis for public entities for fiscal years and
interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is allowed. The Company has
elected early adoption of this amendment to the guidance. The Company has reclassified all deferred tax assets and liabilities as
noncurrent. See Note 1 – Company Overview and Basis of Presentation for details.
FASB ASC 330 ASU 2015-11 -Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory
In July 2015, the FASB issued guidance that will require an entity to measure in scope inventory at the lower of cost and
net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably
predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. Subsequent measurement is unchanged for inventory measured
using LIFO or the retail inventory method. This amendment applies to entities that measure inventory value using the average
cost method. The amendments in this ASU more closely align the measurement of inventory in GAAP with the measurement of
inventory in International Financial Reporting Standards.
The amendment in this ASU is effective on a prospective basis for public entities for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application is permitted as of the beginning of an
interim or annual reporting period. Adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's
consolidated financial statements.
FASB ASC 350 ASU 2015-05 - Customers Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement
In April 2015, the FASB issued amended guidance on about whether a cloud computing arrangement includes a software
license. If a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license, then the customer should account for the software license
55
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
element of the arrangement consistent with the acquisition of other software licenses. If a cloud computing arrangement does not
include a software license, the customer should account for the arrangement as a service contract. The amendments do not change
the accounting for a customer’s accounting for service contracts.
The amendments in this ASU are effective for public entities for annual periods, including interim periods within those
annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. An entity can elect to adopt the amendments
either: (1) prospectively to all arrangements entered into or materially modified after the effective date; or (2) retrospectively.
Adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
FASB ASC 606 ASU 2014-09 - Revenue from Contracts with Customers.
In May 2014, the FASB issued amended guidance on contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or contracts
for the transfer of nonfinancial assets, unless those contracts are within the scope of other standards (e.g., insurance contracts or
lease contracts). The guidance requires an entity to recognize revenue on contracts with customers relating to the transfer of
promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in
exchange for those goods or services. The guidance requires that an entity depict the consideration by applying the following
steps:
Step 1: Identify the contract(s) with a customer.
Step 2: Identify the performance obligations in the contract.
Step 3: Determine the transaction price.
Step 4: Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract.
Step 5: Recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation.
The amendments in this ASU were deferred by ASU 2015-14 for all entities by one year and is effective for annual
reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. Earlier application
is permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within
that reporting period. This amendment is to be either retrospectively adopted to each prior reporting period presented or
retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying this ASU recognized at the date of initial application. Management
is evaluating the impact adoption of this guidance may have on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
NOTE 3 – PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment are stated at historical cost. The historical cost of acquiring an asset includes the costs incurred
to bring it to the condition and location necessary for its intended use. Depreciation is computed on the straight-line basis over
the estimated useful lives of the assets. The useful life of fixtures and equipment ranges from three to 15 years and that of certain
components of building improvements and buildings from 10 to 25 years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter
of the life of the improvement or the expected term of the lease. In some locations, leasehold improvements are amortized over
a period longer than the initial lease term where management believes it is reasonably assured that the renewal option in the
underlying lease will be exercised because an economic penalty may be incurred if the option is not exercised. The sale or
purchase of property and equipment is recognized upon legal transfer of property.
Property and equipment consist of the following (in thousands):
Land
Building and improvements
Fixtures and equipment
Construction in progress
Total property and equipment, historical cost
Less: accumulated depreciation
Property and equipment, net
August 31,
2016
131,896 $
305,420
186,409
46,861
670,586
(197,541)
473,045 $
August 31,
2015
128,071
278,982
164,916
26,679
598,648
(165,608)
433,040
$
$
56
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Depreciation and amortization expense (in thousands):
Years Ended August 31,
2015
2014
2016
Depreciation and amortization expense
$
39,794 $
34,445 $
28,475
The Company capitalizes interest on expenditures for qualifying assets over a period that covers the duration of the
activities required to get the asset ready for its intended use, provided that expenditures for the asset have been made and interest
cost is being incurred. Interest capitalization continues as long as those activities and the incurrence of interest cost continue. The
amount capitalized in an accounting period is determined by applying the capitalization rate (average interest rate) to the average
amount of accumulated expenditures for the qualifying asset during the period. The capitalization rates are based on the interest
rates applicable to borrowings outstanding during the period.
Total interest capitalized (in thousands):
Total interest capitalized
Total interest capitalized (in thousands):
Balance as of
August 31,
2016
August 31,
2015
$
7,380 $
6,961
Interest capitalized
Years Ended August 31,
2015
2014
2016
$
1,082 $
1,055 $
1,482
A summary of asset disposal activity for fiscal years 2016, 2015 and 2014 is as follows (in thousands):
Fiscal Year 2016
Fiscal Year 2015
Fiscal Year 2014
Historical
Cost
Accumulated
Depreciation
Proceeds from
disposal
Gain/(Loss)
recognized
$
$
$
7,578 $
11,740 $
14,733 $
6,330 $
9,367 $
13,146 $
86 $
368 $
142 $
(1,162)
(2,005)
(1,445)
The Company constructed a new warehouse club on land acquired in May 2015 in Chia, Colombia that opened in
September 2016, fiscal year 2017 bringing the total of warehouse clubs operating in Colombia to seven. On December 4, 2015
the Company signed an option to acquire two properties and then swap them for 59,353 square feet of land adjacent to the
Company’s San Pedro Sula warehouse club in Honduras. The parcels of land exchanged are all undeveloped contiguous land
parcels that make them similar in all respects. The transaction was completely nonmonetary in nature, and the transaction did
not generate any gain recognition. The accounting basis of the new property equals $1.9 million (the net book value of the real
estate exchanged). The Company exercised this option and completed the swap during May 2016. The Company will use the
acquired land to expand the parking lot for the San Pedro Sula warehouse club. In March 2016, the Company entered into a
contract, subject to customary contingencies, to acquire a distribution center in Medley, Miami-Dade County, Florida, where we
will transfer the majority of our current Miami distribution center activities once the construction of the building is complete and
the building is ready for occupancy. The Company expects construction to be completed in first half of calendar 2017.
The Company also recorded within accounts payable and other accrued expenses approximately $280,000 and $1.7
million as of August 31, 2016 and $458,000 million and $1.5 million as of August 31, 2015 of liabilities related to the acquisition
and/or construction of property and equipment, respectively.
NOTE 4 – EARNINGS PER SHARE
The Company presents basic net income per share using the two-class method. The two-class method is an earnings
allocation formula that treats a participating security as having rights to earnings that otherwise would have been available to
common stockholders and that determines basic net income per share for each class of common stock and participating security
according to dividends declared (or accumulated) and participation rights in undistributed earnings that would have been available
to common stockholders. A participating security is defined as a security that may participate in undistributed earnings with
common stock. The Company’s capital structure includes securities that participate with common stock on a one-for-one basis
57
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
for distribution of dividends. These are the restricted stock awards and restricted stock units authorized within the 2013 Equity
Incentive Award Plan. The Company determines the diluted net income per share by using the more dilutive of the two class-
method or the treasury stock method and by including the basic weighted average of outstanding stock options in the calculation
of diluted net income per share under the two-class method and including all potential common shares assumed issued in the
calculation of diluted net income per share under the treasury stock method.
The following table sets forth the computation of net income per share for the twelve months ended August 31, 2016,
2015 and 2014 (in thousands, except per share amounts):
Net income
Less: Allocation of income to unvested stockholders
Net earnings available to common stockholders
Basic weighted average shares outstanding
Add dilutive effect of stock options (two-class method)
Diluted average shares outstanding
Basic net income per share
Diluted net income per share
NOTE 5 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Dividends
Years Ended August 31,
2015
2014
2016
$
$
$
$
88,723 $
(1,431)
87,292 $
29,928
5
29,933
2.92 $
2.92 $
89,124 $
(1,137)
87,987 $
29,848
7
29,855
2.95 $
2.95 $
92,886
(1,652)
91,234
29,747
10
29,757
3.07
3.07
The following table summarizes the dividends declared and paid during fiscal years 2016, 2015 and 2014.
First Payment
Second Payment
Declared
2/3/2016
2/4/2015
1/23/2014
Record
Date
Date
Paid
Amount
Record
Date
Date
Paid
0.70 2/15/2016 2/29/2016 $
0.70 2/13/2015 2/27/2015 $
2/28/2014 $
0.70
2/14/2014
0.35 8/15/2016 8/31/2016 $
0.35 8/14/2015 8/31/2015 $
0.35 8/15/2014 8/29/2014 $
Amount
$
$
$
Amount
0.35
0.35
0.35
The Company anticipates the ongoing payment of semi-annual dividends in subsequent periods, although the actual
declaration of future dividends, the amount of such dividends, and the establishment of record and payment dates is subject to
final determination by the Board of Directors at its discretion after its review of the Company’s financial performance and
anticipated capital requirements.
58
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Comprehensive Income and Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
The following table discloses the changes in each component of other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax (in
thousands):
Foreign
currency
translation
adjustments
Defined
benefit
pension
plans
(Amounts in thousands and net of income taxes)
Balances as of August 31, 2013
Other comprehensive income (loss)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss)
Balances as of August 31, 2014
Other comprehensive income (loss)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss)
Balances as of August 31, 2015
Other comprehensive income (loss)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss)
Balances as of August 31, 2016
$
$
(42,321) $
(8,089)
—
(50,410) $
(50,130)
—
$
(100,540) $
(1,702)
—
$
(102,242) $
Derivative
Instruments
998
101 (1)
$
$
Total
(41,475)
(7,728)
(152)
260
5 (2)
113
65
(291) (2)
(113)
(182)
$
$
(20) (2)
(315)
$
(88) (1)(3)
$
1,011
(1,770) (1)
(83)
(49,286)
(51,835)
(100) (1)(3)
(859)
$
(535) (1)
(391)
(101,512)
(2,419)
— (1)(3)
$
(1,394)
(20)
(103,951)
(1) See Note 12 - Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.
(2) Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) related to the minimum pension liability are
included in warehouse club operations in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Income.
(3) Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for settlement of derivative instruments are
included in other income (expense), net in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Income.
Retained Earnings Not Available for Distribution
The following table summarizes retained earnings designated as legal reserves of various subsidiaries which cannot be
distributed as dividends to PriceSmart, Inc. according to applicable statutory regulations (in thousands):
Retained earnings not available for distribution
NOTE 6 – POST EMPLOYMENT PLANS
Defined Contribution Plans
August 31,
2016
August 31,
2015
$
5,926 $
5,479
PriceSmart offers a defined contribution 401(k) retirement plan to its U.S. employees including warehouse club
employees in the U.S. Virgin Islands, which allows employees to enroll in the plan after 90 days of employment. Enrollment in
these plans begins on the first of the month following the employee's eligibility. The Company makes nondiscretionary
contributions to the 401(k) plan with a 4% “Company Contribution” based on the employee’s salary regardless of the employee’s
own contributions to the plan up to the IRS maximum allowed. Effective January 1, 2016, the Company makes nondiscretionary
contributions to the 401(k) plan of 2% to the non-officer employees that defer at least 2% of their salary. Employer contributions
to the 401(k) plan for the Company's U.S. employees were $1.7 million, $1.3 million and $1.2 million during fiscal years 2016,
2015 and 2014, respectively.
PriceSmart also offers and/or is implementing defined contribution retirement plans in most of its subsidiaries. The
Company makes nondiscretionary contributions to these plans based on the employee’s salary, regardless of the employee’s own
contributions to the plan, up to the maximum allowed. The expenses associated with the plans for the Company’s non-US
Employees were $3.1 million, $1.8 million and $1.5 million during fiscal years 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively.
59
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Post-Employment Benefit Plans
The Company's subsidiaries located in three countries are parties to unfunded post-employment benefit plans in which
the subsidiary is required to pay a specified benefit upon retirement, voluntary departure or death of the employee. The amount
of the benefit is predetermined by a formula based on the employee's earnings history, tenure of service and age. Because the
obligation to provide benefits arises as employees render the services necessary to earn the benefits pursuant to the terms of the
plan, the Company recognizes the cost of providing the benefits over the projected employee service periods. These payments
are only due if an employee reaches certain thresholds, such as tenure and/or age. Therefore, these plans are treated as defined
benefit plans. For these defined benefit plans, the Company has engaged actuaries to assist with estimating the current costs
associated with these future benefits. The liabilities for these unfunded plans are recorded as non-current liabilities.
The following table summarizes the amount of the funding obligation and the line items in which it is recorded on the
consolidated balance sheets as of August 31, 2016 and 2015 and consolidated statements of income for the fiscal years ended
August 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands):
Other Long-Term
Liability
Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Loss
August 31,
2016
2015
2016
2015
Operating Expenses
Year Ended August 31,
2015
2016
2014
Start of period
Service cost
Interest cost
Prior service cost
(including amortization)
Actuarial gains/(losses)
Totals
$
$
(807) $
234
(51)
—
(258)
(882) $
(628) $
66
(21)
(311)
87
(807) $
172 $
—
—
35
258
465 $
(148) $
—
—
407
(87)
172 (1) $
— $
35
52
56
(87)
56 $
— $
192
21
(232)
(91)
(110) $
—
356
14
15
(8)
377
(1) The Company has recorded a deferred tax (liability)/asset of $150,000 and $59,000 as of August 31, 2016 and 2015,
respectively, relating to the unrealized expense on defined benefit plans. The Company also recorded accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, for $(315,000) and $(113,000) as of August 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
The valuation assumptions used to calculate the liability for the defined benefit plans differ based on the country
where the plan applies. These assumptions are summarized as follows:
Valuation Assumptions:
Discount rate
Future salary escalation
Percentage of employees assumed to withdraw from Company without a benefit
(“turnover”)
Percentage of employees assumed to withdraw from Company with a benefit
(“disability”)
Year Ended August 31,
2015
2016
1.5% to 10.8 %
3.5% to 10.8%
3.0% to 5.5 %
3.0% to 5.5%
4% to 19.5%
3.5% to 19.5 %
0.5% to 11.4%
0.5% to 11.4 %
60
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Other Post-Employment Plans
Some of the Company’s subsidiaries are parties to funded and unfunded post-employment benefit plans based on services
that the employees have rendered. These plans require the Company to pay a specified benefit on retirement, voluntary departure
or death of the employee, or monthly payments to an external fund manager. The amount of these payments is predetermined by
a formula based on the employee's earnings history and tenure of service. Since the obligation to provide benefits are based on
services that the employees have rendered, the cost associated with providing the benefits is recognized as the employee provides
those services. The employees' rights to receive payment on these plans are not dependent on their reaching certain thresholds
like age or tenure. For these post-employment benefit plans, the Company has accrued liabilities that are recorded as accrued
salaries and benefits and other long-term liabilities. The following table summarizes the amounts recorded on the balance sheet
and amounts expensed on the consolidated statements of income (in thousands):
Accrued Salaries
and Benefits
Other Long-Term
Liability
Restricted Cash
Held (1)
Operating Expenses
2016
2015
2016
Years Ended August 31,
2016
2015
2015
2016
2015
2014
Other Post
Employment Plans
$
358 $
318 $
2,395 $
1,949 $
2,188 $
1,403 $
1,026 $
1,722 $
490
(1) With some locations, local statutes require the applicable Company subsidiary to deposit cash in its own name with
designated fund managers. The funds earn interest which the Company recognizes as interest income.
NOTE 7 – STOCK BASED COMPENSATION
The three types of equity awards offered by the Company are stock options (“options”), restricted stock awards (“RSAs”)
and restricted stock units (“RSUs”). Compensation related to options is accounted for by applying the valuation technique based
on the Black-Scholes model. Compensation related to RSAs and RSUs is based on the fair market value at the time of grant with
the application of an estimated forfeiture rate. The Company recognizes the compensation cost related to these awards over the
requisite service period as determined by the grant, amortized ratably or on a straight line basis over the life of the grant. The
Company utilizes “modified grant-date accounting” for true-ups due to actual forfeitures at the vesting dates. The Company
records the tax savings resulting from tax deductions in excess of expense for stock-based compensation as additional paid-in
capital and the tax deficiency resulting from stock-based compensation in excess of the related tax deduction as a reduction in
paid-in capital, based on the Tax Law Ordering method. In addition, the Company reflects the tax savings (deficiency) resulting
from the taxation of stock-based compensation as a financing cash flow in its consolidated statement of cash flows, rather than
as operating cash flows.
RSAs have the same cash dividend and voting rights as other common stock and are considered to be currently issued
and outstanding shares of common stock. Shares of common stock subject to RSUs are not issued nor outstanding until vested,
and RSUs do not have the same dividend and voting rights as common stock. However, all outstanding RSUs have accompanying
dividend equivalents, requiring payment to the employees and directors with unvested RSUs of amounts equal to the dividend
they would have received had the shares of common stock underlying the RSUs been actually issued and outstanding. Payments
of dividend equivalents to employees are recorded as compensation expense.
The Company adopted the 2013 Equity Incentive Award Plan (the "2013 Plan") for the benefit of its eligible employees,
consultants and non-employee directors on January 22, 2013. The 2013 Plan provides for awards covering up to (1) 600,000
shares of common stock plus (2) the number of shares that remained available for issuance as of January 22, 2013 under three
equity participation plans previously maintained by the Company. The number of shares reserved for issuance under the 2013
Plan increases during the term of the plan by the number of shares relating to awards outstanding under the 2013 Plan or any of
the prior plans that expire, or are forfeited, terminated, canceled or repurchased, or are settled in cash in lieu of shares. However,
in no event will more than an aggregate of 1,233,897 shares of the Company’s common stock be issued under the 2013 Plan. The
following table summarizes the shares authorized and shares available for future grants:
Shares authorized for issuance as of August 31, 2016
(including shares originally authorized for issuance under prior plans)
944,905
August 31,
2016
615,889
August 31,
2015
847,876
2013 Plan
Shares available to grant
61
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The following table summarizes the components of the stock-based compensation expense for the twelve-month periods
ended August 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands), which are included in general and administrative expense and warehouse
club operations in the consolidated statements of income:
Options granted to directors
Restricted stock awards
Restricted stock units
Stock-based compensation expense
Years Ended August 31,
2015
2014
2016
$
$
72 $
7,103
1,946
9,121 $
86 $
4,599
1,284
5,969 $
91
5,326
1,034
6,451
The following tables summarize other information related to stock-based compensation:
Remaining unrecognized compensation cost (in thousands)
Weighted average period of time over which this cost will be recognized
(years)
August 31,
2016
Balance as of
August 31,
2015
August 31,
2014
$
32,380 $
18,421 $
21,196
4
5
6
August 31,
2016
Years Ended
August 31,
2015
August 31,
2014
Excess tax benefit (deficiency) on stock-based compensation (in
thousands)
$
610 $
1,206 $
1,489
The Company began issuing restricted stock awards in fiscal year 2006 and restricted stock units in fiscal year 2008.
The restricted stock awards and units vest over a five to ten year period and the unvested portion of the award is forfeited if the
employee or non-employee director leaves the Company before the vesting period is completed. Restricted stock awards and
units activity for the twelve-months ended August 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 was as follows:
Grants outstanding at beginning of period
Granted
Forfeited
Vested
Grants outstanding at end of period
August 31,
2016
366,021
276,530
(1,372)
(131,299)
509,880
Years Ended
August 31,
2015
488,416
36,382
(10,738)
(148,039)
366,021
August 31,
2014
623,424
14,828
(2,669)
(147,167)
488,416
The following table summarizes the weighted average per share grant date fair value for restricted stock awards and
units for the twelve-months of fiscal years 2016, 2015 and 2014:
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Restricted stock awards and units granted
Restricted stock awards and units vested
Restricted stock awards and units forfeited
August 31,
2016
Years Ended
August 31,
2015
August 31,
2014
$
$
$
84.69 $
71.19 $
— $
88.40 $
45.20 $
65.67 $
105.76
39.91
54.21
62
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The following table summarizes the total fair market value of restricted stock awards and units vested for the period (in
thousands):
August 31,
2016
Years Ended
August 31,
2015
August 31,
2014
Total fair market value of restricted stock awards and units vested (in
thousands)
$
10,139 $
13,192 $
13,797
At the vesting dates of restricted stock awards, the Company repurchases shares at the prior day's closing price per share,
with the funds used to pay the employees' minimum statutory tax withholding requirements. The Company expects to continue
this practice going forward. The following table summarizes this activity during the period:
Shares repurchased
Cost of repurchase of shares (in thousands)
August 31,
2016
Years Ended
August 31,
2015
43,171
52,396
$
3,334 $
4,677 $
August 31,
2014
50,898
4,773
The Company reissues treasury shares as part of its stock-based compensation programs. There have been not been any
reissuances of treasury shares during fiscal years 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
The following table summarizes the stock options outstanding:
Stock options outstanding
August 31,
2016
August 31,
2015
16,000
20,000
Due to the substantial shift from the use of stock options to restricted stock awards and units, the Company believes
stock option activity is no longer significant and that any further disclosure on options is not necessary.
NOTE 8 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Legal Proceedings
From time to time, the Company and its subsidiaries are subject to legal proceedings, claims and litigation arising in the
ordinary course of business and property ownership. The Company evaluates such matters on a case by case basis, and vigorously
contests any such legal proceedings or claims which the Company believes are without merit. The Company establishes an
accrual for legal proceedings if and when those matters reach a stage where they present loss contingencies that are both probable
and reasonably estimable. In such cases, there may be a possible exposure to loss in excess of any amounts accrued. The Company
monitors those matters for developments that would affect the likelihood of a loss and the accrued amount, if any, thereof, and
adjusts the amount as appropriate. If the loss contingency at issue is not both probable and reasonably estimable, the Company
does not establish an accrual, but will continue to monitor the matter for developments that will make the loss contingency both
probable and reasonably estimable. If it is at least a reasonable possibility that a material loss will occur, the Company will
provide disclosure regarding the contingency. The Company believes that the final disposition of the pending legal proceedings,
claims and litigation will not have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations or liquidity. It is possible,
however, that the Company's future results of operations for a particular quarter or fiscal year could be impacted by changes in
circumstances relating to such matters.
Taxes
The Company is required to file federal and state tax returns in the United States and various other tax returns in foreign
jurisdictions. The preparation of these tax returns requires the Company to interpret the applicable tax laws and regulations in
effect in such jurisdictions, which could affect the amount of tax paid by the Company. The Company, in consultation with its
tax advisors, bases its tax returns on interpretations that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. The tax returns,
however, are subject to routine reviews by the various taxing authorities in the jurisdictions in which the Company files its returns.
As part of these reviews, a taxing authority may disagree with respect to the interpretations the Company used to calculate its tax
liability and therefore require the Company to pay additional taxes.
63
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The Company accrues an amount for its estimate of probable additional income tax liability. In certain cases, the impact
of an uncertain income tax position on the income tax return must be recognized at the largest amount that is more-likely-than-
not to be sustained upon audit by the relevant tax authority. An uncertain income tax position will not be recognized if it has less
than 50% likelihood of being sustained (see Note 9 - Income Taxes for additional information).
In evaluating the exposure associated with various non-income tax filing positions, the Company accrues for probable
and estimable exposures for non-income tax related tax contingencies. As of August 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company has
recorded within other accrued expenses a total of $4.0 million and $4.1 million, respectively, for various non-income tax related
tax contingencies.
While the Company believes the recorded liabilities are adequate, there are inherent limitations in projecting the outcome
of litigation, in estimating probable additional income tax liability taking into account uncertain tax positions and in evaluating
the probable additional tax associated with various non-income tax filing positions. As such, the Company is unable to make a
reasonable estimate of the sensitivity to change of estimates affecting its recorded liabilities. As additional information becomes
available, the Company assesses the potential liability and revises its estimates as appropriate.
During fiscal year 2014, the Company was required to make tax payments with respect to various income tax cases that
it is currently appealing, and during the first quarter of fiscal year 2015, the Company received provisional tax assessments with
respect to deductibility and withholdings. These payments and assessments are discussed in further detail within Note 9, Income
Taxes.
Other Commitments
The Company is committed under non-cancelable operating leases for the rental of facilities and land (see Note 11
Leases).
The Company is also committed to non-cancelable construction services obligations for various warehouse club
developments and expansions. As of August 31, 2016 the Company had approximately $1.5 million in contractual obligations
for construction services not yet rendered.
The Company has entered into a land purchase option agreement that has not been recorded as a commitment, for which
the Company has recorded within the balance sheet deposits for approximately $642,000. The land purchase option agreements
can be canceled at the sole option of the Company. The Company does not have a time table of when or if it will exercise this
land purchase option, due to the uncertainty related to the completion of the Company's due diligence review. The Company's
due diligence review includes evaluations of the legal status of the property, the zoning and permitting issues related to acquiring
approval for the construction and operation of a warehouse club and any other issues related to the property itself that could
render the property unsuitable or limit the property's economic viability as a warehouse club site. If the purchase option agreement
is exercised, the cash use would be approximately $16.9 million.
In March 2016, the Company entered into a contract, subject to customary contingencies, to acquire a distribution center
in Medley, Miami-Dade County, Florida, to which it will transfer the majority of its current Miami distribution center activities
once the construction of the building is complete and the building is ready for occupancy. The Company currently expects
construction to be completed in the first half of calendar year 2017. The total purchase price is approximately $46.0 million.
During March 2016, the Company deposited into escrow $300,000 of cash and approximately $8.8 million through an irrevocable
and unconditional standby letter of credit payable to the seller. This letter of credit also contains an automatic one year renewal
and entitles the seller to draw upon this letter of credit fully or partially on demand if the seller, per the underlying purchase
contract, is entitled to draw down upon the letter of credit under prescribed conditions.
See Note 14 - Unconsolidated Affiliates for a description of additional capital contributions that may be required in
connection with joint ventures to develop commercial centers adjacent to PriceSmart warehouse clubs in Panama and Costa Rica.
The Company contracts for distribution center services in Mexico. The contract for this distribution center's services
expires on August 31, 2017, with the applicable fees and rates to be reviewed at the beginning of each calendar year. Future
minimum service commitments related to this contract through the end of the contract term are approximately $166,000.
64
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
NOTE 9 – INCOME TAXES
Income from continuing operations before provision for income taxes and loss of unconsolidated affiliates includes the
following components (in thousands):
United States
Foreign
Income from continuing operations before provision for income taxes
and loss of unconsolidated affiliates
Years Ended August 31,
2015
2016
$
25,533 $
105,707
41,694 $
94,902
2014
34,927
99,322
$
131,240 $
136,596 $
134,249
Significant components of the income tax provision are as follows (in thousands):
Current:
U.S.
Foreign
Total
Deferred:
U.S.
Foreign
Valuation allowance charge (release)
Total
Provision for income taxes
Years Ended August 31,
2016
2015
2014
$
$
$
$
$
9,269 $
30,705
39,974 $
832 $
(82)
2,125
2,875 $
42,849 $
10,918 $
33,676
44,594 $
3,941 $
(3,100)
2,131
2,972 $
47,566 $
11,921
29,120
41,041
613
(381)
99
331
41,372
The reconciliation of income tax computed at the Federal statutory tax rate to the provision for income taxes is as follows
(in percentages):
Federal tax provision at statutory rates
State taxes, net of federal benefit
Differences in foreign tax rates
Permanent items and other adjustments
Increase (decrease) in foreign valuation allowance
Provision for income taxes
Years Ended August 31,
2015
35.0 %
2016
35.0 %
0.2
(5.6)
2.0
1.0
32.6 %
0.4
(4.2)
2.3
1.3
34.8 %
2014
35.0 %
0.3
(5.2)
0.8
(0.1)
30.8 %
65
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets as of August 31, 2016 and 2015 are shown below (in
thousands):
Deferred tax assets:
U.S. net operating loss carryforward
Foreign tax credits
Deferred compensation
U.S. timing differences and alternative minimum tax credits
Foreign net operating losses
Foreign timing differences:
Accrued expenses and other timing differences
Depreciation and amortization
Deferred income
Gross deferred tax assets
U.S. deferred tax liabilities (depreciation and other timing differences)
Foreign deferred tax liabilities netted against deferred tax assets
U.S. valuation allowance
Foreign valuation allowance
Net deferred tax assets
August 31,
2016
2015
$
$
3,226 $
185
1,706
2,846
13,414
3,807
8,923
3,606
37,713
(3,944)
(8,848)
(652)
(12,011)
12,258 $
4,611
—
1,563
2,438
9,493
5,385
6,855
3,474
33,819
(3,761)
(4,677)
(652)
(9,884)
14,845
As of August 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company had net deferred tax liabilities of $1.8 million at the end of each period,
$1.8 million arising from timing differences in certain subsidiaries.
For fiscal year 2016, the effective tax rate was 32.6%. The decrease in the effective rate versus the prior year was
primarily attributable to an intercompany transaction between PriceSmart, Inc. and its Colombian subsidiary in support of
PriceSmart’s ongoing market development and growth in Colombia. This intercompany transaction resulted in a favorable impact
on the effective tax rate of 3% due to reductions to taxable income in the U.S. and a resulting increase in taxable income in our
Colombia subsidiary. This income did not generate income tax expense in Colombia, because the additional taxable income in
Colombia was fully offset by the reversal of valuation allowances on accumulated net losses in that subsidiary. We expect a
similar favorable impact to the consolidated Company’s effective tax rate over the next several quarters. Additionally, in
comparison to the prior year, there was an offsetting unfavorable impact of 1.5% due to the establishment of a valuation allowance
against the deferred tax assets of the Company’s Barbados subsidiary.
For fiscal year 2016, management concluded that a valuation allowance continues to be necessary for certain U.S. and
foreign deferred tax assets, primarily because of the existence of negative objective evidence, such as the fact that certain
subsidiaries are in a cumulative loss position for the past three years, and the determination that certain net operating loss
carryforward periods are not sufficient to realize the related deferred tax assets. The Company factored into its analysis the
inherent risk of forecasting revenue and expenses over an extended period of time and also considered the potential risks
associated with its business. Additionally, regarding the Company’s Barbados subsidiary, while the Company forecasts
profitability for the immediate and foreseeable future, due to the existence of negative objective evidence from recent years, the
establishment of a valuation allowance of approximately $2.0 million was necessary in order to reduce deferred tax assets to
amounts expected to be realized. The Company had net foreign deferred tax assets of $8.9 million and $10.6 million as of
August 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
The Company has U.S. federal and state tax NOLs at August 31, 2016 of approximately $7.4 million and $7.4 million,
respectively. The federal and state NOLs generally expire during periods ranging from 2016 through 2027, unless previously
utilized. In calculating the tax provision and assessing the likelihood that the Company will be able to utilize the deferred tax
assets, the Company considered and weighed all of the evidence, both positive and negative, and both objective and subjective.
The Company factored in the inherent risk of forecasting revenue and expenses over an extended period of time and considered
the potential risks associated with its business. Using the Company's U.S. income from continuing operations and projections of
future taxable income in the U.S., the Company was able to determine that there was sufficient positive evidence to support the
conclusion that it was more likely than not that the Company would be able to realize substantially all of its U.S. NOLs by
generating sufficient taxable income during the carry-forward period. However, the Company maintains a valuation allowance
on substantially all of its state NOLs due to the adoption of single sale factor apportionment in California, which significantly
reduces taxable income in this state.
66
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The Company has determined that due to a deemed change of ownership (as defined in Section 382 of the Internal
Revenue Code) in October 2004, there will be annual limitations in the amount of U.S. taxable income of approximately $3.5
million that may be offset by NOLs. The Company does not believe this will impact the recoverability of these NOLs.
The Company does not provide for income taxes which would be payable if undistributed earnings of its foreign
subsidiaries were remitted to the U.S., because the Company considers these earnings to be permanently reinvested as
management has no plans to repatriate undistributed earnings and profits of foreign affiliates. As of August 31, 2016 and 2015,
the undistributed earnings of these foreign subsidiaries are approximately $472.5 million and $405.2 million, respectively. Upon
distribution of those earnings in the form of dividends or otherwise, the Company would be subject to both U.S. income taxes
and withholding taxes payable to the foreign countries, but would also be able to offset unrecognized foreign tax
credits. Determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred U.S. income tax liability is not practicable because of the
complexities associated with its hypothetical calculation.
The Company accrues for the estimated additional amount of taxes for uncertain income tax positions if the likelihood
of sustaining the tax position does not meet the more likely than not standard for recognition of tax benefits.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows (in thousands):
Years Ended August 31,
2015
2014
2016
Balance at beginning of fiscal year
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year
Settlements
Expiration of the statute of limitations for the assessment of taxes
Balance at end of fiscal year
$
$
8,159 $
—
—
(405)
7,754 $
8,786 $
—
—
(627)
8,159 $
9,373
964
(1,093)
(458)
8,786
As of August 31, 2016, the liability for income taxes associated with uncertain tax benefits was $7.8 million and can be
reduced by $7.2 million of tax benefits associated with timing adjustments which are recorded as deferred tax assets and liabilities.
The net amount of $600,000, if recognized, would favorably affect the Company's financial statements and favorably affect the
Company's effective income tax rate.
The Company expects changes in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits in the next 12 months as the result of a lapse
in various statutes of limitations. The lapse of statutes of limitations in the 12-month period ending August 31, 2017 could result
in a total income tax benefit amounting up to $129,000.
The Company recognizes interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense. As of August 31,
2016 and 2015, the Company had accrued $370,000 and $619,000, respectively, for the payment of interest and penalties (before
income tax benefit).
The Company has various appeals pending before tax courts in its subsidiaries' jurisdictions. Any possible settlement
could increase or decrease earnings but is not expected to be significant. Audit outcomes and the timing of audit settlements are
subject to significant uncertainty. During the first quarter of fiscal year 2015, one of the Company’s subsidiaries received
provisional assessments claiming $2.5 million of taxes, penalties and interest related to withholding taxes on certain charges for
services rendered by the Company. In addition, this subsidiary received provisional assessments totaling $5.1 million for lack of
deductibility of the underlying service charges due to the lack of withholding. Based on a review of the Company's tax advisers'
interpretation of local law, rulings and jurisprudence (including Supreme Court precedents with respect to the deductibility
assessment), the Company expects to prevail in both instances and has not recorded a provision for these assessments. In another
country in which the Company has warehouse clubs, beginning in fiscal year 2015, a new minimum income tax mechanism took
effect, which requires the Company to pay taxes based on a percentage of sales rather than income. As a result, the Company is
making income tax payments substantially in excess of those it would expect to pay based on taxable income. The current rules
(which the Company has challenged in court) do not clearly allow the Company to obtain a refund or to offset this excess income
tax against other taxes. As of August 31, 2016, the Company had deferred tax assets of approximately $1.9 million in this country.
Also, the Company had an income tax receivable balance of $2.5 million as of August 31, 2016 related to excess payments from
fiscal years 2015 and 2016. The Company has not placed any type of allowance on the recoverability of these tax receivables or
deferred tax assets, because the Company believes that it is more likely than not that it will succeed in its refund request and/or
court challenge on this matter.
67
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The Company and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state and foreign
jurisdictions. The Company is generally no longer subject to income tax examinations by tax authorities in its major jurisdictions
except for the fiscal years subject to audit as set forth in the table below:
Tax Jurisdiction
U.S. federal
California (U.S.) (state return)
Florida(U.S.) (state return)
Aruba
Barbados
Costa Rica
Colombia
Dominican Republic
El Salvador
Guatemala
Honduras
Jamaica
Mexico
Nicaragua
Panama
Trinidad
U.S. Virgin Islands
Spain
Fiscal Years Subject to Audit
2000 to 2005, 2007, 2013 to the present
2005, 2007 and 2012 to the present
2007 and 2013 to the present
2012 to the present
2010 to the present
2011 to the present
2011 to the present
2011 to the present
2009 to 2010 and 2013 to the present
2009, 2012 to the present
2012 to the present
2010 to the present
2011 to the present
2012 to the present
2013 to the present
2010 to the present
2001 to the present
2013 to the present
Generally for U.S. federal and U.S. Virgin Islands tax reporting purposes, the statute of limitations is three years from
the date of filing of the income tax return. If and to the extent the tax year resulted in a taxable loss, the statute is extended to
three years from the filing date of the income tax return in which the carryforward tax loss was used to offset taxable income in
the carryforward year. Given the historical losses in these jurisdictions and the Section 382 change in control limitations on the
use of the tax loss carryforwards, there is uncertainty and significant variation as to when a tax year is no longer subject to audit.
NOTE 10 – DEBT
Short-term borrowings consist of lines of credit which are secured by certain assets of the Company and its subsidiaries.
The short-term borrowing facilities are summarized below (in thousands):
Total Amount
of Facilities
Short-term
Borrowings
Letters of
Credit
Facilities
Available
Weighted average
interest rate
August 31, 2016
August 31, 2015
$
$
65,000 $
57,691 $
16,534 $
6,606 $
9,224 $
728 $
39,242
50,357
10.1 %(1)
5.9 %
Facilities Used
(1) Increased from prior year due to an increase in the loan rate in the Company’s Colombia Subsidiary
As of August 31, 2016 and August 31, 2015, the Company had approximately $40.0 million of short-term facilities in
the U.S. that require compliance with certain quarterly financial covenants. As of August 31, 2016 and August 31, 2015, the
Company was in compliance with respect to these covenants.
68
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The following table provides the changes in long-term debt for the twelve months ended August 31, 2016:
(Amounts in thousands)
Balances as of August 31, 2015
Proceeds from long-term debt incurred during the period:
Costa Rica subsidiary
Trinidad subsidiary
Repayments of long-term debt:
Repayment of loan by Trinidad subsidiary
Regularly scheduled loan payments
Reclassifications of long-term debt
Translation adjustments on foreign-currency debt of subsidiaries
whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar (2)
Balances as of August 31, 2016
Current
portion of
long-
term debt
Long-term
debt (net of
current
portion)
Total
$
17,169 $
73,365 $
90,534
(1)
—
1,000
(2,771)
(553)
(731)
7,370
6,000
—
(13,200)
731
7,370
7,000
(2,771)
(13,753)
—
451
14,565 $
(724)
73,542 $
(273)
88,107
(3)
$
(1) The carrying amount on non-cash assets assigned as collateral for this total was $104.1 million. No cash assets were assigned
as collateral for this total.
(2) These foreign currency translation adjustments are recorded within Other comprehensive income.
(3) The carrying amount on non-cash assets assigned as collateral for this total was $102.4 million. No cash assets were assigned
as collateral for this total.
The following table provides a summary of the long-term loans entered into by the Company:
Loans entered into by the Company's subsidiaries with a balloon payment due at the end of
the loan term and with non-cash assets and/or cash or cash equivalents assigned as
collateral and with/without established debt covenants
Loans entered into by the Company's subsidiaries for which the subsidiary has entered into
an interest rate swap with non-cash assets and/or cash or cash equivalents assigned as
collateral and with/without established debt covenants
Loans entered into by the Company's subsidiaries with non-cash assets and/or cash or cash
equivalents assigned as collateral and with/without established debt covenants
Loans entered into by the Company's subsidiaries for which the subsidiary has entered into
a cross-currency interest rate swap with non-cash assets and/or cash or cash equivalents
assigned as collateral and with/without established debt covenants
Total long-term debt
Less: current portion
Long-term debt, net of current portion
August 31,
2016
August 31,
2015
$
21,945 $
12,225
32,258
37,458
9,717
12,564
24,187
88,107
14,565
73,542 $
28,287
90,534
17,169
73,365
$
As of August 31, 2016, the Company had approximately $76.0 million of long-term loans in Trinidad, Panama, El
Salvador, Honduras, Costa Rica, Barbados and Colombia that require these subsidiaries to comply with certain annual or quarterly
financial covenants, which include debt service and leverage ratios. As of August 31, 2016, the Company was in compliance
with all covenants or amended covenants.
As of August 31, 2015, the Company had approximately $85.0 million of long-term loans in Trinidad, Panama, El
Salvador, Honduras, Costa Rica, Barbados, and Colombia that require these subsidiaries to comply with certain annual or
quarterly financial covenants, which include debt service and leverage ratios. As of August 31, 2015, the Company was in
compliance with all covenants or amended covenants.
69
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Annual maturities of long-term debt are as follows (in thousands):
Years Ended August 31,
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Thereafter
Total (1)
Amount
14,102
13,975
24,805
21,117
8,394
2,403
84,796
$
$
(1)
In the case of loans subject to cross-currency interest rate swaps, the Company has used the effective rate to the Company
under the applicable derivative obligation as of August 31, 2016 to disclose the future commitments of the related long-term
debt.
70
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
NOTE 11 – LEASES
The Company is committed under non-cancelable operating leases for the rental of facilities and land. These leases expire
or become subject to renewal between August 17, 2017 and January 29, 2044.
As of August 31, 2016, the Company’s warehouse clubs occupied a total of approximately 2,835,117 square feet of which
522,131 square feet were on leased property. The following is a summary of the warehouse clubs and Company facilities located
on leased property:
Facility Type
Location
Warehouse Club
Salitre, Colombia
Via Brazil, Panama
Warehouse Club
Miraflores, Guatemala (1) Warehouse Club
Pradera, Guatemala
Warehouse Club
Tegucigalpa, Honduras Warehouse Club
Oranjestad, Aruba
Warehouse Club
Port of Spain, Trinidad Warehouse Club
Warehouse Club
St. Thomas, U.S.V.I.
Storage Facility
Barbados
Employee Parking
Chaguanas, Trinidad
Container Parking
Chaguanas, Trinidad
Storage and Distribution
Facility
Jamaica
Date Opened
October 29, 2014
December 4, 1997
April 8, 1999
May 29, 2001
May 31, 2000
March 23, 2001
December 5, 2001
May 4, 2001
December 1, 2012
May 1, 2009
April 1, 2010
September 1, 2012
Approximate
Square
Footage
Current Lease
Expiration Date
Remaining
Option(s)
to Extend
20 years
10 years
98,566 January 29, 2044
68,696 October 31, 2026
68,977 December 31, 2020 5 years
48,438 May 28, 2021
64,735 May 30, 2020
64,627 March 23, 2021
54,046 July 5, 2031
54,046 February 28, 2020
12,517 November 30, 2025 3 years
none
none
10 years
none
10 years
4,944 April 30, 2024
65,340 March 31, 2025
none
none
17,000 July 14, 2019
2 years
Santo Domingo,
Dominican Republic
Bogota, Colombia (2)
San Diego, CA (3)
Miami, FL(4)
Panama
Costa Rica
Trinidad
Central Offices
June 1, 2010
2,002 January 14, 2021
5 years
Central Offices
Corporate Headquarters
Distribution Facility
Central Offices
Storage and
Distribution Facility
Storage and
Distribution Facility
October 21, 2010
April 1, 2004
March 1, 2008
November 4, 2014
7,812 December 31, 2017 none
43,027 May 31, 2026
5 years
371,476 December 31, 2027 5 years
17,975 December 12, 2028 15 years
January 28, 2013
37,674 January 27, 2019
3 years
August 18, 2014
17,110 August 17, 2017
none
(1)
In April 2016, the Company executed an amendment to the existing lease to expand the facility’s parking lot by 2,918 square
feet of space.
(3)
(2) On August 31, 2016, the Company executed a contract to expand the central office space to include an additional 1,884
square feet of space, effective September 1, 2016. The additional space is not included in the table above; however, the lease
is included in the calculation of future minimum lease commitments.
In January 2015, the Company executed a fourth amendment to include 2,799 square feet of space, in which the Company
sub-leased all 2,799 square feet of space to another party through October 2016. The 2,799 square feet of space is not included
in the above table.
In August 2016, the Company executed a fourth amendment to the existing lease, to extend the portion of the lease pertaining
to 100,295 square feet of space through December 31, 2027.
(4)
71
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The following table summarizes the components of rental expense charged for operating leases of open locations for
fiscal years 2016, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands):
Minimum rental payments
Deferred rent accruals
Total straight line rent expense
Contingent rental payments
Common area maintenance expense
Rental expense
Years Ended August 31,
2016
2015
2014
9,986 $
1,363
11,349
3,208
1,369
15,926 $
10,074 $
1,355
11,429
3,137
1,321
15,887 $
7,952
1,514
9,466
3,220
1,212
13,898
$
$
Future minimum lease commitments for facilities under these leases with an initial term in excess of one year are as
follows (in thousands):
Years Ended August 31,
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Thereafter
Total
Leased
Locations(1)
$
$
11,246
11,311
10,719
10,081
8,714
68,786
120,857
(1) Operating lease obligations have been reduced by approximately $426,823 to reflect sub-lease income. Certain obligations
under leasing arrangements are collateralized by the underlying asset being leased.
The following table summarizes the components of rental income recorded for operating leases for fiscal years 2016,
2015 and 2014 (in thousands):
Minimum rental receipts
Deferred rent accruals
Total straight line rent income
Contingent rental receipts
Common maintenance area income
Rental income
Years Ended August 31,
2015
2014
2016
2,735 $
56
2,791
112
151
3,054 $
2,873 $
47
2,920
86
148
3,154 $
2,646
187
2,833
59
129
3,021
$
$
The Company entered into leases as landlord for rental of land and/or building space for properties it owns. The
following is a schedule of future minimum rental income on non-cancelable operating leases with an initial term in excess of one
year from owned property as of August 31, 2016 (in thousands):
Years Ended August 31,
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Thereafter
Total
72
Amount
2,131
1,730
1,480
1,328
1,169
5,276
13,114
$
$
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
NOTE 12 – DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
The Company is exposed to interest rate risk relating to its ongoing business operations. To manage interest rate
exposure, the Company enters into hedge transactions (interest rate swaps) using derivative financial instruments. The objective
of entering into interest rate swaps is to eliminate the variability of cash flows in the LIBOR interest payments associated with
variable-rate loans over the life of the loans. As changes in interest rates impact the future cash flow of interest payments, the
hedges provide a synthetic offset to interest rate movements.
In addition, the Company is exposed to foreign currency and interest rate cash flow exposure related to a non-functional
currency long-term debt some of its wholly owned subsidiaries. To manage this foreign currency and interest rate cash flow
exposure, the Company’s subsidiary entered into a cross-currency interest rate swap that converts its U.S. dollar denominated
floating interest payments to functional currency fixed interest payments during the life of the hedging instrument. As changes
in foreign exchange and interest rates impact the future cash flow of interest payments, the hedge is intended to offset changes in
cash flows attributable to interest rate and foreign exchange movements.
These derivative instruments (cash flow hedging instruments) are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, with the
effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative reported as a component of other comprehensive income (loss) and
reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction is determined to be ineffective. There
were no such amounts recorded for ineffectiveness for the periods reported herein related to the interest rate or cross-currency
interest rate swaps of long-term debt.
The Company is exposed to foreign-currency exchange-rate fluctuations in the normal course of business, including
foreign-currency exchange-rate fluctuations on U.S. dollar denominated liabilities within its international subsidiaries whose
functional currency is other than the U.S. dollar. The Company manages these fluctuations, in part, through the use of non-
deliverable forward foreign-exchange contracts that are intended to offset changes in cash flow attributable to currency exchange
movements. These contracts are intended primarily to economically address exposure to U.S. dollar merchandise inventory
expenditures made by the Company’s international subsidiaries whose functional currency is other than the U.S. dollar. Currently,
these contracts do not qualify for derivative hedge accounting. The Company seeks to mitigate foreign-currency exchange-rate
risk with the use of these contracts and does not intend to engage in speculative transactions. These contracts do not contain any
credit-risk-related contingent features.
Cash Flow Hedges
As of August 31, 2016, all of the Company’s interest rate swap and cross-currency interest rate swap derivative financial
instruments are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges. The Company formally documents the hedging relationships for its
derivative instruments that qualify for hedge accounting.
73
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The following table summarizes agreements for which the Company has recorded cash flow hedge accounting
transactions during the twelve months ended August 31, 2016:
Date
Entered
into
Derivative
Financial
Counter-
party
Derivative
Financial
Instruments
Initial
US$
Notional
Amount
Bank
US$
loan
Held
with
Floating Leg
(swap
counter-
party)
Fixed Rate
for PSMT
Subsidiary
Settlement
Dates
28-Aug-15 Citibank, N.A.
Cross currency
$
7,500,000 Citibank,
Variable rate
7.65 % 28th day of August,
Subsidiary
Costa Rica
("Citi")
interest rate swap
N.A.
3-month Libor
plus 2.50%
November, February,
and May beginning on
November 30, 2015
Honduras
24-Mar-15 Citibank, N.A.
Cross currency
$
8,500,000 Citibank,
Variable rate
10.75 % 24th day of March,
("Citi")
interest rate swap
N.A.
3-month Libor
plus 3.25%
June, September, and
December beginning
on June 24, 2015
Effective
Period of swap
August 28, 2015 -
August 28, 2020
March 24,2015 -
March 20, 2020
El Salvador
16-Dec-14
Bank of Nova
Interest rate swap
$
4,000,000 Bank of
Scotia
("Scotiabank")
Nova
Scotia
Variable rate
30-day Libor
plus 3.5%
4.78 % 29th day of each
month beginning on
December 29, 2014
December 1, 2014 -
August 29, 2019
Colombia
10-Dec-14
Citibank, N.A.
Cross currency
$
15,000,000 Citibank,
Variable rate
8.25 % 4th day of March,
("Citi")
interest rate swap
N.A.
3-month Libor
plus 2.8%
December 4, 2014 -
December 3, 2019
June, Sept, Dec.
beginning on March 4,
2015
Panama
9-Dec-14
Bank of Nova
Interest rate swap
$
10,000,000 Bank of
Scotia
("Scotiabank")
Nova
Scotia
Variable rate
30-day Libor
plus 3.5%
5.16 % 28th day of each
month beginning
December 29, 2014
November 28, 2014 -
November 29, 2019
Honduras
23-Oct-14
Citibank, N.A.
Cross currency
$
5,000,000 Citibank,
Variable rate
11.6 % 22nd day of January,
("Citi")
interest rate swap
N.A.
3-month Libor
plus 3.5%
April, July, and
October beginning on
January 22, 2015
October 22, 2014 -
October 22, 2017
Panama
1-Aug-14
Bank of Nova
Interest rate swap
$
5,000,000 Bank of
Scotia
("Scotiabank")
Nova
Scotia
Panama
22-May-14 Bank of Nova
Interest rate swap
$
19,800,000 Bank of
Scotia
("Scotiabank")
Nova
Scotia
Panama
22-May-14 Bank of Nova
Interest rate swap
$
3,970,000 Bank of
Scotia
("Scotiabank")
Nova
Scotia
Variable rate
30-day Libor
plus 3.5%
Variable rate
30-day Libor
plus 3.5%
Variable rate
30-day Libor
plus 3.5%
4.89 % 21st day of each month
beginning on
September 22, 2014
August 21, 2014 -
August 21, 2019
4.98 % 4th day of each month
beginning on June 4,
2014
May 5, 2014 -
April 4, 2019
4.98 % 4th day of each month
beginning on June 4,
2014
May 5, 2014 -
April 4, 2019
For the twelve-month periods ended August 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 the Company included the gain or loss on the
hedged items (that is, variable-rate borrowings) in the same line item—interest expense—as the offsetting gain or loss on the
related interest rate swaps as follows (in thousands):
Income Statement Classification
Interest expense for the years ended August 31, 2016
Interest expense for the years ended August 31, 2015
Interest expense for the years ended August 31, 2014
Interest
expense on
borrowings(1)
Cost of
swaps (2)
$
$
$
3,087 $
2,205 $
674 $
1,982 $
2,827 $
1,632 $
Total
5,069
5,032
2,306
(1) This amount is representative of the interest expense recognized on the underlying hedged transactions.
(2) This amount is representative of the interest expense recognized on the cross-currency interest rate swaps designated as cash
flow hedging instruments.
74
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The total notional balance of the Company’s pay-fixed/receive-variable interest rate swaps and cross-currency interest
rate swaps was as follows (in thousands):
Floating Rate Payer (Swap Counterparty)
Scotiabank
Citibank N.A.
Total
Notional Amount as of
August 31,
2016
30,188 $
32,258
62,446 $
$
$
August 31,
2015
37,458
34,287
71,745
The following table summarizes the fair value of interest rate swap and cross-currency interest rate swap derivative
instruments that qualify for derivative hedge accounting (in thousands, except footnote data):
Derivatives designated as cash flow
hedging instruments
Cross-currency interest rate swaps(1)
Interest rate swaps
Cross-currency interest rate swaps
Net fair value of derivatives
designated as hedging instruments
Balance Sheet
Location
Other non-current
assets
Other long-term
liabilities
Other long-term
liabilities
August 31, 2016
Net Tax
Effect
Fair
Value
Net
OCI
August 31, 2015
Net Tax
Effect
Fair
Value
Net
OCI
$
3,224
(1,248)
1,976 $
4,129 $
(1) $ (4,128)
(448)
115
(333)
(387)
98
289
(1,066)
320
(746)
(1,312)
482
830
$
1,710 $
(813) $
897 $
2,430 $
579 $ (3,009)
(1) The beneficial tax effect of these swaps was largely offset by a valuation allowance in fiscal year 2015. By contrast, in fiscal
year 2016, the fair value of the cross-currency interest rate swap in Colombia no longer was offset by a valuation allowance
as the derivatives position changed to a deferred tax liability.
There were no derivatives settled during the twelve months ended August 31, 2016. The following table summarizes the
derivatives that were settled during the twelve months ended August 31, 2015 (in thousands):
Date
23-Jul-15
31-Jul-15
31-Jul-15
6-Aug-15
Payment of
Derivative
Obligation
$
$
5,141
1,343
4,029
4,944
15,457
Foreign
Exchange on
Derivative
Obligation
Recognize
Settlement of
Derivative
Right net of
Bank Fees
Swap
Derivative
(Gain)Loss
2,929
670
2,011
3,181
8,791
(2,859)
(657)
(1,971)
(3,056)
(8,543)
50
11
21
70
152 (1)
(1) Reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to other income (expense) for settlement of derivative
instruments in the amount of $100,000 net of tax.
Fair Value Instruments
The Company has entered into non-deliverable forward foreign-exchange contracts. These contracts are treated for
accounting purposes as fair value contracts and do not qualify for derivative hedge accounting. The use of non-deliverable
forward foreign-exchange contracts is intended to offset changes in cash flow attributable to currency exchange movements.
These contracts are intended primarily to economically hedge exposure to U.S. dollar merchandise inventory expenditures made
by the Company’s international subsidiaries whose functional currency is other than the U.S. dollar.
75
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The following table summarizes these agreements as of August 31, 2016:
Dates
entered into
Aug-16
Derivative
Financial
Counter-party
Derivative
Financial
Instrument
Banco Colpatria Forward foreign
Subsidiary
Colombia
Colombia
Aug-16
Citibank, N.A.
Costa Rica (1) 31-Aug-16
Citibank, N.A.
exchange contracts
Forward foreign
exchange contracts
Forward foreign
exchange contracts
Notional
Amount
(in thousands) Settlement Date
Effective Period
of Forward
$
$
$
4,800 October 2016 -
November 2016
460 November 23,
2016
3,750 August 30, 2017
August 2016 -
November 2016
August 2016 -
November 2016
August 31, 2016-
August 30, 2017
(1) The original non-deliverable forward foreign-exchange contract, entered on August 31, 2015, was settled on August 30, 2016
and reissued on August 31, 2016 for the same amount of $3.8 million.
For the twelve-month periods ended August 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, the Company included in its consolidated
statements of income the forward derivative (gain) or loss on the non-deliverable forward foreign-exchange contracts as follows
(in thousands):
Income Statement Classification
Other income (expense), net
Years Ended August 31
2015
2016
2014
$
(166) $
6,533 $
(463)
The following table summarizes the fair value of foreign currency forward contracts that do not qualify for derivative
hedge accounting (in thousands):
Derivatives designated as fair value hedging instruments
Foreign currency forward contracts
Net fair value of derivatives designated as hedging
instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting
NOTE 13 – RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS
August 31, 2016
August 31, 2015
Balance Sheet
Location
Other accrued
expenses
Fair Value
$
(110)
$
(110)
Balance Sheet
Location
Other accrued
expenses
Fair Value
$
$
(66)
(66)
Use of Private Plane: From time to time members of the Company’s management use private planes owned in part
by La Jolla Aviation, Inc. to travel to business meetings in Latin America and the Caribbean. La Jolla Aviation, Inc. is solely
owned by The Robert and Allison Price Trust, and Robert Price the Company's Chairman of the Board, is a Director and Officer
of La Jolla Aviation, Inc. The Company has reimbursed La Jolla Aviation for such travel at the hourly rate of the Company's
private aircraft for such travel. The Company incurred expenses of approximately $182,000, $225,000 and $59,000 for the years
ended August 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, for these services.
Relationship with Aseprismar: Aseprismar is a PriceSmart employee association located in Costa Rica that purchases
discarded packaging materials received by the Company from incoming shipments of merchandise. The Company recorded
approximately $123,000, $157,000 and $48,000 in other income from the sale of packaging materials to Aseprismar for the years
ended August 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. In addition, the Company also contracts with Aseprismar for freight
transportation between the Company's Costa Rica warehouse clubs. The Company incurred approximately $80,000, $35,000 and
$17,000 for freight expense with Aseprismar for the years ended August 2016, 2015 and 2014.
Relationship with Francisco Velasco: Francisco Velasco is the Executive Vice President, General Counsel, Secretary
and Chief Ethics and Compliance Officer for the Company. As part of his employment agreement dated July 2016, the Company
entered into an agreement to purchase his home in Chicago, IL, in July based on its appraised value for approximately $625,000.
The agreement also states that the Company will lease the property back to Francisco Velasco for $2,500 a month until he relocates
to San Diego, CA. The Company also reimburses Francisco Velasco the monthly the lease payments. For the year ended August
31, 2016, the Company charged and then reimbursed approximately $2,500. The Company intends to sell this property once
Francisco Velasco has fully relocated.
76
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Relationships with Edgar Zurcher: Edgar Zurcher is a director of the Company. Mr. Zurcher is a partner in a law firm
that the Company utilizes in certain legal matters. The Company incurred approximately $26,000, $18,000 and $27,000 in legal
expenses with this firm for the years ended August 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Mr. Zurcher is also a director of a
company that owns 40% of Payless ShoeSource Holdings, Ltd., which rents retail space from the Company. The Company has
recorded approximately $1.4 million in rental income for this space during each of the years ended August 31, 2016, 2015 and
2014. Additionally, Mr. Zurcher is a director of Molinos de Costa Rica S.A. The Company paid approximately $502,000,
$496,000 and $461,000 for products purchased from this entity during the years ended August 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014,
respectively. Also, Mr. Zurcher is a director of Roma Prince S.A. PriceSmart purchased products from this entity for
approximately $1.2 million for the year ended August 31, 2016 and $1.3 million for each of the years ended August 31, 2015 and
2014.
Relationship with Gonzalo Barrutieta: Gonzalo Barrutieta is a director of the Company. Mr. Barrutieta is also a member
of the Board of Directors of Office Depot Mexico, S.A. de C.V., which operates OD Panama, S.A. ("ODP"), which rents retail
space from the Company. The Company has recorded approximately $272,000, $266,000 and $261,000 in rental income and
common area maintenance charges for this space during the years ended August 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. On
December 11, 2015, the Company's joint venture Golf Park Plaza, S.A. ("GPP") transferred final ownership of land to ODP,
following its execution of the related purchase option. The deed was recorded with the relevant agencies in Panama during
February 2016. ODP had on July 15, 2011 (fiscal year 2011), entered into a 30 year operating lease, with an option to buy, for
approximately 26,000 square feet of land owned by GPP. The option to purchase the land had a three-year limit beginning in
April 2013. As part of this transaction, ODP: (i) made an initial deposit to GPP in the sum of approximately $545,000 at the time
of signing the agreement; (ii) paid a second deposit of approximately $436,000 at the time its building was completed and its
store opened to the public; (iii) paid monthly rent per the lease clause of the agreement which the Company recognized on a
straight line basis; and (iv) contracted to pay an additional $109,000, less rental payments of $39,000 previously applied per the
lease clause, when ODP exercised its option to purchase the land. ODP opened its store in April of 2013. GPP recorded rental
income on a straight line basis for approximately $106,000, $72,000 and $12,000 during the fiscal years ended August 31, 2015,
2014 and 2013, respectively. During fiscal year 2016 GPP recorded rental income for approximately $1,000. GPP recorded a
gain, net of tax, on the sale of the land for approximately $851,000 during February 2016. ODP paid approximately $1,000,
$106,000 and $72,000 in rental payments during the fiscal years ended August 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Relationships with Price Family Charitable Organizations: During the years ended August 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014,
the Company sold approximately $427,000, $371,000 and $222,000, respectively, of supplies to Price Philanthropies Foundation.
Robert Price, Chairman of the Company's Board of Directors, is the Chairman of the Board and President of Price Philanthropies
Foundation and Price Charities. Sherry S. Bahrambeygui, a director of the Company and Vice Chair of the Board, serves as
Executive Vice President, Secretary and Vice Chairman of the Boards of Price Charities, fka San Diego Revitalization Corp., and
Price Philanthropies Foundation. The Company also participated initially with Price Charities, a charitable non-profit public
benefit corporation, in a charitable program known as “Aprender y Crecer” ("Learn and Grow”) by allowing PriceSmart members
to donate money in the warehouse clubs to that program. Beginning January 1, 2015, the Aprender y Crecer program was
transferred from Price Charities to Price Philanthropies Foundation. The Company is also participating with Price Philanthropies
and selected vendors where the vendors channel donations through the Company based on a percentage of sales of their products
within the warehouse clubs. The Company collaborated with Price Charities, Price Philanthropies Foundation, and local charitable
groups to use these donations to acquire and deliver supplies to schools in the communities surrounding PriceSmart clubs. Vendors
send their donations to PriceSmart, which records them as a liability for donations received. The liability for donations received,
but not yet applied to the purchase of school supplies was approximately $139,000, and $36,000 as of August 31, 2016 and 2015,
respectively.
Relationships with Mitchell G. Lynn: Mr. Lynn has been a director of the Company since November 2011. Mr. Lynn is the
founder, limited partner and a general Partner of CRI 2000, LP, dba Combined Resources International ("CRI"), which designs,
develops and manufactures consumer products for domestic and international wholesale distribution, primarily through
warehouse clubs. The Company paid approximately $625,000, $353,000 and $157,000 for products purchased from this entity
during the years ended August 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Mr. Lynn is also a founder, limited partner and a general
partner of ECR4Kids, LP ("ECR") which designs, manufactures and sells educational/children's products to wholesale dealers.
The Company paid approximately $3,000, $31,000 and $3,000 for products purchased from this entity during the years ended
August 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Relationship with Golf Park Plaza, S.A.: Golf Park Plaza, S.A. is a real estate joint venture located in Panama entered
into by the Company in 2008 (see Note 14 - Unconsolidated Affiliate). On December 12, 2013, the Company entered into a lease
agreement for approximately 17,976 square feet (1,670 square meters) of land with Golf Park Plaza, S.A. upon which the
Company constructed its central offices in Panama. The lease term is for 15 years with three options to renew for five years each
at the Company's discretion. The monthly lease expense is approximately $8,800. For the twelve months ended August 31, 2016,
2015 and 2014 the Company recognized rent expense of $105,700 $105,700 and $79,000 for this lease, respectively.
77
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Relationships with Pierre Mignault: Mr. Pierre Mignault was elected to the Board of Directors, effective August 1, 2015.
Mr. Mignault has been a consultant for the Company since September 2009, serving as an independent sourcing agent with
Canadian suppliers. In his role as an independent sourcing agent, Mr. Mignault received commissions of $208,000, $154,000 and
$74,000 from certain vendors related to the sale of product to the Company in fiscal years 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. In
his role as consultant for the Company, he earned $60,000 in each year for the twelve months ended August 31, 2016, 2015 and
2014.
NOTE 14 – UNCONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES
The Company determines whether any of the joint ventures in which it has made investments is a Variable Interest Entity
(“VIE”) at the start of each new venture and if a reconsideration event has occurred. At this time, the Company also considers
whether it must consolidate a VIE and/or disclose information about its involvement in a VIE. A reporting entity must consolidate
a VIE if that reporting entity has a variable interest (or combination of variable interests) that will absorb a majority of the VIE's
expected losses, receive a majority of the VIE's expected residual returns, or both. A reporting entity must consider the rights
and obligations conveyed by its variable interests and the relationship of its variable interests with variable interests held by other
parties to determine whether its variable interests will absorb a majority of a VIE's expected losses, receive a majority of the
VIE's expected residual returns, or both. The reporting entity that consolidates a VIE is called the primary beneficiary of that
VIE.
In 2008, the Company entered into real estate joint ventures to jointly own and operate separate commercial retail centers
adjacent to warehouse clubs in Panama (Golf Park Plaza, S.A.) and Costa Rica (Plaza Alajuela, S.A.). Due to the initial nature
of the joint ventures and the continued commitments for additional financing, the Company determined these joint ventures are
VIEs. Since all rights, obligations and the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the VIE's economic
performance is shared equally by both parties within each joint venture, the Company has determined that it is not the primary
beneficiary of the VIEs and, therefore, has accounted for these entities under the equity method. Under the equity method, the
Company's investments in unconsolidated affiliates are initially recorded as an investment in the stock of an investee at cost and
are adjusted for the carrying amount of the investment to recognize the investor's share of the earnings or losses of the investee
after the date of the initial investment.
On December 12, 2013, the Company entered into a lease agreement for approximately 17,976 square feet (1,670 square
meters) of land with Golf Park Plaza, S.A. upon which the Company constructed its central offices in Panama. Construction of
the offices was completed in October 2014. The lease term is for 15 years with three options to renew for five years each at the
Company's discretion. The Company recognized $105,700 in rent expense for the fiscal years ended August 31, 2016 and 2015.
On December 11, 2015, the Company's joint venture Golf Park Plaza, S.A. ("GPP") transferred final ownership of land
to OD Panama, S.A. ("ODP"), which is operated by Office Depot Mexico, S.A. de C.V., following its execution of the related
purchase option. The deed was recorded with the relevant agencies in Panama during February 2016. ODP had on July 15, 2011
(fiscal year 2011), entered into a 30 year operating lease, with an option to buy, for approximately 26,000 square feet of land
owned by GPP. The option to purchase the land had a three-year limit beginning in April 2013. As part of this transaction, ODP:
(i) made an initial deposit to GPP in the sum of approximately $545,000 at the time of signing the agreement; (ii) paid a second
deposit of approximately $436,000 at the time its building was completed and its store opened to the public; (iii) paid monthly
rent per the lease clause of the agreement which the Company recognized on a straight line basis; and (iv) contracted to pay an
additional $109,000, less rental payments of $39,000 previously applied per the lease clause, when ODP exercised its option to
purchase the land. ODP opened its store in April of 2013. GPP recorded rental income on a straight line basis for approximately
$106,000, $72,000 and $12,000 during the fiscal years ended August 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. During fiscal year
2016 GPP recorded rental income for approximately $1,000. GPP recorded a gain, net of tax, on the sale of the land for
approximately $851,000 during February 2016. Gonzalo Barrutieta, who is a director of the Company, is also a member of the
Board of Directors of Office Depot Mexico, S.A. de C.V., which operates ODP.
78
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The table below summarizes the Company’s interest in these VIEs and the Company’s maximum exposure to loss as a
result of its involvement with these VIEs as of August 31, 2016 (in thousands):
%
Ownership
Initial
Investment
Additional
Investments
Net
(Loss)/Income
Inception to
Date
Company’s
Variable
Interest
in Entity
Commitment
to Future
Additional
Investments(1)
Company's
Maximum
Exposure
to Loss in
Entity(2)
50 % $
50 %
$
4,616 $
2,193
6,809 $
2,402 $
1,236
3,638 $
310 $
10
320 $
7,328 $
3,439
10,767 $
99 $
785
884 $
7,427
4,224
11,651
Entity
GolfPark Plaza, S.A.
Price Plaza Alajuela, S.A.
Total
(1) The parties intend to seek alternate financing for the project, which could reduce the amount of investments each party would
be required to provide. The parties may mutually agree on changes to the project, which could increase or decrease the
amount of contributions each party is required to provide.
(2) The maximum exposure is determined by adding the Company’s variable interest in the entity and any explicit or implicit
arrangements that could require the Company to provide additional financial support.
The summarized financial information of the unconsolidated affiliates is as follows (in thousands):
Current assets
Noncurrent assets
Current liabilities
Noncurrent liabilities
Net income (loss)
NOTE 15 – SEGMENTS
August 31,
2016
August 31,
2015
$
$
$
$
663 $
11,752 $
219 $
16 $
432
12,157
1,120
11
Years Ended August 31,
2015
2014
2016
$
332 $
94 $
18
The Company and its subsidiaries are principally engaged in the international operation of membership shopping in 38
warehouse clubs located in 13 countries/territories that are located in Central America, the Caribbean and Colombia. In addition,
the Company operates distribution centers and corporate offices in the United States. The Company has aggregated its warehouse
clubs, distribution centers and corporate offices into reportable segments. The Company’s reportable segments are based on
management’s organization of these locations into operating segments by general geographic location, used by management and
the Company's chief operating decision maker in setting up management lines of responsibility, providing support services, and
making operational decisions and assessments of financial performance. Segment amounts are presented after converting to U.S.
dollars and consolidating eliminations. Certain revenues, operating costs and inter-company charges included in the United States
segment are not allocated to the segments within this presentation, as it is impractical to do so, and they appear as reconciling
items to reflect the amount eliminated on consolidation of intersegment transactions.
Prior to fiscal year 2015, the Company's reportable segments were the United States, Latin American and the Caribbean.
During the second quarter of fiscal year 2015, the Company created a new reportable segment comprised of its Colombia
Operations and separated the Colombia Operations from the Latin America Operations, renaming that reportable segment Central
America Operations. The Company has made this change as a result of the information that the Company's chief operating
decision maker regularly reviews for purposes of allocating resources and assessing performance and the growing level of
investment and sales activity in Colombia. Therefore, beginning in the second quarter of fiscal year 2015, the Company has
reported its financial performance based on these new reportable segments and retrospectively adopted this change for the
disclosure of financial information presented by reportable segment. This presentation more closely reflects the information
reviewed by the Company's chief operating decision maker.
The Company also retrospectively, early adopted ASU 2015-17, as of the second quarter of fiscal year 2016.
Accordingly, the Company reclassified current deferred tax assets and liabilities to noncurrent on its consolidated balance sheet
reported for fiscal year ended 2015.
79
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The following table summarizes the impact of this reclassifications on segment reporting:
United
States
Operations
Central
American
Operations
Caribbean
Operations
Colombia
Operations
Reconciling
Items
Total
As of August 31, 2015
Total assets as previously reported
Reclassification of deferred tax liabilities short term and
long term to deferred tax assets long term
Total assets as currently reported
As of August 31, 2014
Total assets as previously reported
Reclassification of deferred tax liabilities short term and
long term to deferred tax assets long term
Total assets as currently reported
$
89,167 $
491,548 $
239,311 $
171,666 $
— $
991,692
$
(34)
89,133 $
(393)
491,155 $
(39)
239,272 $
(2)
171,664 $
—
— $
(468)
991,224
$
91,175 $
457,395 $
223,251 $
166,249 $
— $
938,070
$
(38)
91,137 $
(680)
456,715 $
(14)
223,237 $
—
166,249 $
—
— $
(732)
937,338
80
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The following tables summarize by segment certain revenues, operating costs and balance sheet items (in thousands):
Years Ended August 31, 2016
Revenue from external customers
Intersegment revenues
Depreciation and amortization
Operating income
Interest income from external sources
Interest income from intersegment sources
Interest expense from external sources
Interest expense from intersegment sources
Provision for income taxes
Net income
Long-lived assets (other than deferred tax assets)
Goodwill
Investment in unconsolidated affiliates
Total assets
Capital expenditures, net
Years Ended August 31, 2015
Revenue from external customers
Intersegment revenues
Depreciation and amortization
Operating income
Interest income from external sources
Interest income from intersegment sources
Interest expense from external sources
Interest expense from intersegment sources
Provision for income taxes
Net income
Long-lived assets (other than deferred tax assets)
Goodwill
Investment in unconsolidated affiliates
Total assets
Capital expenditures, net
Years Ended August 31, 2014
Revenue from external customers
Intersegment revenues
Depreciation and amortization
Operating income
Interest income from external sources
Interest income from intersegment sources
Interest expense from external sources
Interest expense from intersegment sources
Provision for income taxes
Net income
Long-lived assets (other than deferred tax assets)
Goodwill
Investment in unconsolidated affiliates
Total assets
Capital expenditures, net
United
States
Operations
Central
American
Operations
Caribbean
Operations
Colombia
Operations
Reconciling
Items(1)
Total
$
$
$
33,885 $
1,086,677
4,775
8,576
25
2,519
—
61
10,047
(1,459)
19,222
—
—
100,744
8,617
33,320 $
1,107,592
2,733
26,728
79
3,142
5
126
15,548
11,490
15,391
—
—
89,133
1,655 (2)
31,279 $
959,297
2,238
22,191
18
2,603
34
120
12,739
9,360
16,584
—
—
91,137
7,627
1,758,853 $
—
18,673
136,613
802
944
4,823
2,059
23,227
108,777
271,039
31,091
10,767
515,478
29,375
1,625,567 $
—
15,115
130,763
811
282
4,147
1,204
24,618
102,397
255,576
31,211
10,317
491,155
54,735
1,503,446 $
—
12,992
119,101
631
325
2,530
1,054
21,542
96,204
236,663
31,383
8,863
456,715
35,802
840,648 $
5,941
9,907
52,044
381
554
547
1,854
8,697
43,708
108,426
4,546
—
287,088
11,402
821,047 $
5,626
9,605
49,351
114
556
607
1,966
6,787
41,626
107,746
4,660
—
239,272
10,619
785,225 $
5,265
9,062
45,343
159
561
712
2,014
6,701
38,534
108,409
4,725
—
223,237
9,534
271,790 $
—
6,439
(4,984)
99
—
521
49
878
(6,777)
137,599
—
—
193,425
30,300
322,669 $
—
6,992
(1,488)
54
—
1,681
684
613
(7,401)
105,290
—
—
171,664
24,172
197,617 $
—
4,183
4,881
45
—
1,019
301
390
3,597
131,300
—
—
166,249
68,177
— $
(1,092,618)
—
(55,526)
—
(4,017)
—
(4,023)
—
(55,526)
—
—
—
—
— $
(1,113,218)
—
(58,988)
—
(3,980)
—
(3,980)
—
(58,988)
—
—
—
—
—
— $
(964,562)
—
(54,809)
—
(3,489)
—
(3,489)
—
(54,809)
—
—
—
—
—
2,905,176
—
39,794
136,723
1,307
—
5,891
—
42,849
88,723
536,286
35,637
10,767
1,096,735
79,694
2,802,603
—
34,445
146,366
1,058
—
6,440
—
47,566
89,124
484,003
35,871
10,317
991,224
91,181
2,517,567
—
28,475
136,707
853
—
4,295
—
41,372
92,886
492,956
36,108
8,863
937,338
121,140
(1) The reconciling items reflect the amount eliminated on consolidation of intersegment transactions.
(2) The decrease in operating income and net income for the United States Operations in fiscal year 2016 compared to fiscal
year 2015 was primarily a result of the increase in operating expenses related to intercompany transactions with the
Company’s Colombia subsidiary of approximately $10.9 million. This activity results in reductions to taxable income in the
U.S. that lowered the provision for income taxes by approximately $3.9 million.
NOTE 16 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
The Company has evaluated all events subsequent to the balance sheet date of August 31, 2016 through the date of
issuance of these consolidated financial statements and has determined that there are no subsequent events that require disclosure.
81
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
NOTE 17 – QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
Summarized quarterly financial information for fiscal years 2016, 2015 and 2014 is as follows (in thousands, except per
share data):
Fiscal Year 2016
Total net warehouse club and export sales
Total cost of goods sold
Net income from continuing operations
Net income
Basic net income per share
Diluted net income per share
Fiscal Year 2015
Total net warehouse club and export sales
Total cost of goods sold
Net income from continuing operations
Net income
Basic net income per share
Diluted net income per share
Fiscal Year 2014
Total net warehouse club and export sales
Total cost of goods sold
Net income from continuing operations
Net income
Basic net income per share
Diluted net income per share
Three Months Ended,
Year Ended,
Nov 30, 2015 Feb 29, 2016 May 31, 2016 Aug 31, 2016 Aug 31, 2016
2,854,553
$
2,449,626
$
88,723
$
88,723
$
2.92
$
2.92
$
698,316 $
596,644 $
22,272 $
22,272 $
0.74 $
0.74 $
765,536 $
657,725 $
25,942 $
25,942 $
0.85 $
0.85 $
691,638 $
597,242 $
16,837 $
16,837 $
0.55 $
0.55 $
699,063 $
598,015 $
23,672 $
23,672 $
0.78 $
0.78 $
Three Months Ended,
Year Ended,
Nov 30, 2014 Feb 28, 2015 May 31, 2015 Aug 31, 2015 Aug 31, 2015
2,754,411
$
2,352,839
$
89,124
$
89,124
$
2.95
$
2.95
$
686,436 $
586,114 $
22,447 $
22,447 $
0.75 $
0.75 $
738,349 $
631,810 $
24,835 $
24,835 $
0.82 $
0.82 $
684,780 $
587,860 $
21,195 $
21,195 $
0.70 $
0.70 $
644,846 $
547,055 $
20,647 $
20,647 $
0.68 $
0.68 $
Three Months Ended,
Year Ended,
Nov 30, 2013 Feb 28, 2014 May 31, 2014 Aug 31, 2014 Aug 31, 2014
2,475,593
$
2,113,664
$
92,886
$
92,886
$
3.07
$
3.07
$
611,785 $
519,931 $
21,856 $
21,856 $
0.73 $
0.73 $
663,931 $
568,075 $
28,278 $
28,278 $
0.93 $
0.93 $
604,462 $
515,930 $
21,320 $
21,320 $
0.70 $
0.70 $
595,415 $
509,728 $
21,432 $
21,432 $
0.71 $
0.71 $
82
MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
The Company's common stock has been quoted and traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol
“PSMT” since September 2, 1997. As of October 20, 2016, there were approximately 26,532 holders of record of the common
stock.
2016 FISCAL QUARTERS
First Quarter
Second Quarter
Third Quarter
Fourth Quarter
2015 FISCAL QUARTERS
First Quarter
Second Quarter
Third Quarter
Fourth Quarter
Dates
Stock Price
From
To
High
Low
9/1/2015 11/30/2015 $
12/1/2015
3/1/2016
6/1/2016
2/29/2016
5/31/2016
8/31/2016
97.26 $
93.80
88.95
94.28
9/1/2014 11/30/2014 $
12/1/2014
3/1/2015
6/1/2015
2/28/2015
5/31/2015
8/31/2015
96.96 $
93.35
86.03
102.75
76.65
70.11
78.00
76.00
85.23
79.44
75.20
81.48
83
The graph below matches PriceSmart, Inc.'s cumulative 5-Year total shareholder return on common stock
with the cumulative total returns of the NASDAQ Composite index and the NASDAQ Retail Trade index. The graph
tracks the performance of a $100 investment in our common stock and in each index (with the reinvestment of all
dividends) from 8/31/2011 to 8/31/2016.
COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
Among PriceSmart, Inc., the NASDAQ Composite Index
and the NASDAQ Retail Trade Index
$300
$250
$200
$150
$100
$50
$0
8/11
8/12
8/13
8/14
8/15
8/16
PriceSmart, Inc.
NASDAQ Composite
NASDAQ Retail Trade
*$100 invested on 8/31/11 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends.
Fiscal year ending August 31.
PriceSmart, Inc.
NASDAQ Composite
NASDAQ Retail Trade
100.00
100.00
100.00
112.67
121.11
120.48
133.38
144.70
140.76
140.12
186.94
160.37
133.97
195.63
205.05
132.84
215.46
244.07
8/11
8/12
8/13
8/14
8/15
8/16
The stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.
84
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
There were no sales of unregistered securities during the year ended August 31, 2016.
Dividends
Declared
2/3/2016
2/4/2015
1/23/2014
First Payment
Second Payment
Record
Date
Date
Paid
Amount
Record
Date
Date
Paid
0.70 2/15/2016 2/29/2016 $
0.70 2/13/2015 2/27/2015 $
2/28/2014 $
0.70
2/14/2014
0.35 8/15/2016 8/31/2016 $
0.35 8/14/2015 8/31/2015 $
0.35 8/15/2014 8/29/2014 $
Amount
$
$
$
Amount
0.35
0.35
0.35
The Company anticipates the ongoing payment of semi-annual dividends in subsequent periods, although the actual
declaration of future dividends, the amount of such dividends, and the establishment of record and payment dates is subject to
final determination by the Board of Directors at its discretion after its review of the Company’s financial performance and
anticipated capital requirements.
Repurchase of Equity Securities
Upon vesting of restricted stock awarded by the Company to employees, the Company repurchases shares and withholds
the amount of the repurchase payment to cover employees’ tax withholding obligations. As set forth in the table below, during
fiscal year 2016, the Company repurchased a total of 43,171 shares in the indicated months. These were the only repurchases of
equity securities made by the Company during fiscal year 2016. The Company does not have a stock repurchase program.
(a)
Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased
(b)
Average
Price Paid
Per Share
(c)
Total Number of
Shares Purchased
as Part of Publicly
Publicly Announced
Plans or Programs
— $
—
—
—
26,637
—
723
—
—
—
1,978
13,833
43,171 $
—
—
—
—
73.43
—
83.75
—
—
—
79.01
83.91
77.22
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(d)
Maximum Number
of Shares That May
Yet Be Purchased
Under the
Plans or Programs
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Period
September 1, 2015 - September 30, 2015
October 1, 2015 - October 31, 2015
November 1, 2015 - November 30, 2015
December 1, 2015 - December 31, 2015
January 1, 2016 - January 31, 2016
February 1, 2016 - February 29, 2016
March 1, 2016 - March 31, 2016
April 1, 2016 - April 30, 2016
May 1, 2016 - May 31, 2016
June 1, 2016 - June 30, 2016
July 1, 2016 - July 31, 2016
August 1, 2016 - August 31, 2016
Total
85
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY
Directors
The table below indicates the name, current position with the Company and age of each director:
Name
Robert E. Price
Sherry S. Bahrambeygui
Gonzalo Barrutieta
Gordon B. Hanson
Katherine L. Hensley
Leon C. Janks
Jose Luis Laparte
Mitchell Lynn
Gary Malino
Pierre Mignault
Edgar Zurcher
Information Regarding Directors:
Position
Chairman of the Board
Vice Chair of the Board
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director, Chief Executive Officer and President
Director
Director
Director
Director
Age
74
52
50
52
79
67
50
67
59
68
65
Robert E. Price has been Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company since July 1994 and served as Chief
Executive Officer of the Company from April 2006 until July 2010. Mr. Price served as Interim Chief Executive Officer of the
Company from April 2003 until April 2006 and also served as Interim President of the Company from April 2003 until October
2004. Mr. Price also served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company from July 1994 until January 1998. Mr.
Price is President of Price Charities, fka San Diego Revitalization Corp. Mr. Price previously served as Chairman of the Board
of Price Enterprises, Inc. (“PEI”) from July 1994 until November 1999 and was President and Chief Executive Officer of PEI
from July 1994 until September 1997. Mr. Price was Chairman of the Board of Price/Costco, Inc. (“Price/Costco”) from October
1993 to December 1994. From 1976 to October 1993, he was Chief Executive Officer and a director of The Price Company
(“TPC”). Mr. Price served as Chairman of the Board of TPC from January 1989 to October 1993, and as its President from 1976
until December 1990. Mr. Price has been a Manager of The Price Group, LLC since August 2000. Mr. Price’s significant
experience as an executive and director of warehouse club merchandising businesses, as well as his extensive knowledge of the
Company’s business, history and culture, contribute to the Board of Directors’ conclusion that he should serve as a director of
the Company.
Sherry S. Bahrambeygui has been a director of the Company since November 2011 and Vice Chair of the Board since
October 2016. Ms. Bahrambeygui joined The Price Group, LLC in September 2006 and has served as a Managing Member since
January 2007. Additionally, Ms. Bahrambeygui serves as Executive Vice President, Secretary and Vice Chairman of the Boards
of Price Charities (fka San Diego Revitalization Corp.), and Price Philanthropies Foundation, and is the Chief Executive Officer
of PS Ivanhoe, LLC, a commercial real estate company. Ms. Bahrambeygui was a licensed stockbroker and a founding partner
of the law firm of Hosey & Bahrambeygui, LLP. She has practiced law with an emphasis in employment, compensation, business
and corporate matters since 1993 and had provided consultation and legal representation to the Company from time-to-time
between 2001 and 2008. Ms. Bahrambeygui was admitted in August 2015 to the Bar of the Supreme Court of the United States.
Ms. Bahrambeygui’s thorough understanding of the business and operations of the Company, as well as having effectively
assisted the Company on certain legal and business matters, contribute to the Board of Directors’ conclusion that she should serve
as a director of the Company.
Gonzalo Barrutieta has been a director of the Company since February 2008. Mr. Barrutieta was employed in several
capacities with Grupo Gigante, S.A. de C. V. from 1994 to 2006, including as Director of Real Estate and New Business
Development. Since 1994, he has served as a member of the board of directors of Grupo Gigante. From 2002 through 2005,
Mr. Barrutieta was a director of PriceSmart Mexico (formerly a joint venture between the Company and Grupo Gigante) and
served as Chief Executive Officer of PriceSmart Mexico from 2003 to 2005. Mr. Barrutieta has also been a director of Hoteles
Presidente since 2004, of Office Depot Mexico since 2005, of Radio Shack Mexico from 2005 until 2012, and has served as
President and director of Operadora IPC de Mexico since 2007. Mr. Barrutieta’s experience as an executive and director of
international merchandising businesses, as well as his general knowledge and understanding of the markets in Central America,
contribute to the Board of Directors’ conclusion that he should serve as a director of the Company.
Gordon H. Hanson has been a director of the Company since April 2014. Mr. Hanson has been a tenured member of the
economics faculty at the University of California, San Diego since 2001. At UC San Diego, Mr. Hanson is the Acting Dean of
the School of Global Policy and also directs the Center on Global Transformation. From 1998 to 2001, he was a tenured member
of management faculty to the University of Michigan, and from 1992 to 1998, he was on the economics faculty of the University
86
of Texas. From 2009 until 2014, he served as a director of the Washington Office on Latin America, a non-profit organization
working to promote civic advancement in the region, chairing their development committee. Mr. Hanson’s extensive background
in the analysis of the economies of Latin America, including over two decades of experience in consulting for international
financial organizations, contribute to the Board of Directors’ conclusion that he should serve as director of the Company.
Katherine L. Hensley has been a director of the Company since July 1997 and served as a director of PEI from December
1994 until July 1997. She is a retired partner of the law firm of O’Melveny & Myers in Los Angeles, California. Ms. Hensley
joined O’Melveny & Myers in 1978 and was a partner from 1986 to 1992. From 1994 to 2000, Ms. Hensley served as a trustee
of Security First Trust, an open-end investment management company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
Ms. Hensley’s extensive background in the legal field, including her experience in executive compensation and corporate matters,
and her many years of service to the Company as a member of the Board of Directors, contribute to the Board of Directors’
conclusion that she should serve as a director of the Company.
Leon C. Janks has been a director of the Company since July 1997 and served as a director of PEI from March 1995 until
July 1997. He has been a partner in the accounting firm of Green, Hasson & Janks LLP in Los Angeles, California since 1980
and serves as its Managing Partner. Mr. Janks has extensive experience in domestic and international business, serving a wide
variety of clients in diverse businesses. Mr. Janks is a certified public accountant. Mr. Janks’ experience, and his significant
accounting, financial and tax expertise and his many years of service to the Company as a member of the Board of Directors,
contribute to the Board of Directors’ conclusion that he should serve as a director of the Company.
Jose Luis Laparte has been a director of the Company since February 2008, Chief Executive Officer of the Company
since July 2010 and President of the Company since October 2004. Mr. Laparte initially served as a consultant for the Company
from December 2003 to October 2004. Prior to joining the Company as a consultant, Mr. Laparte worked for more than 14 years
at Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. in Mexico and the United States in progressively responsible positions. From October 2002 through
September 2003, he served as Vice President of Sam’s International, where he directed and managed the company’s operations,
finance, sales, marketing, product development and merchandising. From May 2000 to October 2002, he served as Vice President,
Wal-Mart de Mexico, responsible for sales and the expansion of the Sam’s Club format in Mexico. Mr. Laparte’s background
and experience as an executive overseeing numerous operational aspects of the international merchandising business, including
sales, product development, merchandising, marketing, finance and information technology, contribute to the Board of Directors’
conclusion that he should serve as a director of the Company.
Mitchell G. Lynn has been a director of the Company since November 2011. Mr. Lynn served in several senior executive
positions and as the President and a director of TPC prior to its merger in 1993 with Costco, Inc., and from 1993 until 1994, he
served as an executive officer, director and member of the Executive Committee of Price/Costco. Mr. Lynn also was a member
of The Price Group, LLC from 2005 to 2008. Mr. Lynn is a founding and continuing director of Bodega Latina Corporation, dba
El Super, a 61-store warehouse-style grocery retailer that targets the Hispanic market in the Western United States. Mr. Lynn is
also the founder, limited partner and a general partner of CRI 2000, LP, dba Combined Resources International (“CRI”), which
designs, develops and manufactures consumer products under various brand names for domestic and international wholesale
distribution, primarily through warehouse clubs. Mr. Lynn also is a founder, limited partner and a general partner of ECR4Kids
LP (“ECR”), which designs, manufactures and sells educational/classroom products to wholesale dealers Mr. Lynn is a certified
public accountant (inactive) and a licensed real estate broker in California. Mr. Lynn’s extensive prior experience in both the
warehouse club business and general retailing and his significant knowledge relating to accounting and financial matters
contribute to the Board of Directors’ conclusion that he should serve as a director of the Company.
Gary Malino has been a director of the Company since April 2016. Mr. Malino is a former senior executive of Realty
Income Corporation, a real estate investment trust (REIT) listed on the New York Stock Exchange. Mr. Malino joined Realty
Income Corporation in 1985 and was the Chief Financial Officer from 1994 until 2001 when he was promoted to President and
Chief Operating Officer, the position he held until his retirement in 2014. Prior to joining Realty Income, Mr. Malino was a
certified public accountant for a Los Angeles based accounting firm (1981-1985) and assistant controller with McMillin
Development Company, a real estate development company (1979-1981). Mr. Malino’s extensive experience as a prior executive
of a publicly traded company, his accounting background and his extensive experience with finance and real estate matters
contributed to the Board of Directors’ conclusion that he should serve as a Director of the Company.
Pierre Mignault has been a director of the Company since August 2015. Mr. Mignault has more than 45 years’ experience
in the retail sector, starting his career in 1969 as a management trainee with The Bay Department Stores (Hudson’s Bay Company)
and working through a series of executive positions, ultimately serving as General Manager for the eastern region from 1983
until 1985. From 1985 to 1993, he served as Chief Executive Officer of Price Club Canada. Mr. Mignault served as Chief
Executive Officer of Probigo Inc., a Canadian public company and the second largest food retailer in Canada, from 1993 until it
was acquired by Loblaw Companies Limited in November 1998, remaining with that company through March 1999. From 2000
until September 2005, he was Chairman of Fly America Furniture, a private company. Mr. Mignault’s extensive knowledge and
significant experience in both the warehouse club business and general retailing contribute to the Board of Directors’ conclusion
that he should serve as a director of the Company.
87
Edgar Zurcher has been a director of the Company since October 2009 and also served as a director of the Company from
November 2000 to February 2008. Mr. Zurcher has been a partner in the law firm Zurcher, Odio & Raven in Costa Rica since
1980, which the Company uses as counsel for certain legal matters. Mr. Zurcher is also President of PLP, S.A., as well as a
director of Payless ShoeSource Holdings, Ltd. (“Payless Shoes”). PLP, S.A. owns 40% of Payless Shoes, which rents retail space
from PriceSmart. Additionally, Mr. Zurcher is a director of Molinos de Costa Rica Pasta and Roma S.A. dba Roma Prince S.A.,
from which the Company purchases products to sell to its members at its warehouse clubs, and is a director of Promerica Financial
Corporation, S.A. from which the Company received rental income and credit card fees in fiscal years 2007 and 2008.
Mr. Zurcher’s background in legal matters and his significant experience in Central America business and legal affairs contribute
to the Board of Directors’ conclusion that he should serve as a director of the Company.
Officers
The executive officers of the Company and their ages are as follows:
Name
Jose Luis Laparte
Rodrigo Calvo
Frank Diaz
Brud E. Drachman
John M. Heffner
John D. Hildebrandt
William J. Naylon
Francisco Velasco
Jesus Von Chong (1)
Position
Chief Executive Officer and President and Director
Executive Vice President – Real Estate
Executive Vice President – Logistics and Distribution
Executive Vice President – Construction and Facilities
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Executive Vice President – Operations
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
Executive Vice President, General Counsel, Secretary and
Chief Ethics and Compliance Officer
Executive Vice President – Merchandising
Age
50
45
47
61
62
58
54
45
50
(1) Jesus Von Chong became Executive Vice President – Merchandising effective September 1, 2016.
Jose Luis Laparte has been a director of the Company since February 2008, Chief Executive Officer of the Company
since July 2010 and as President of the Company since October 2004. Mr. Laparte initially served as a consultant for the Company
from December 2003 to October 2004. Prior to joining the Company as a consultant, Mr. Laparte worked for more than 14 years
at Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. in Mexico and the United States in progressively responsible positions. From October 2002 through
September 2003, he served as Vice President of Sam’s International, where he directed and managed the company’s operations,
finance, sales, marketing, product development and merchandising. From May 2000 to October 2002, he served as Vice President,
Wal-Mart de Mexico, responsible for sales and the expansion of the Sam’s Club format in Mexico.
Rodrigo Calvo has been Executive Vice President – Real Estate of the Company since June 2015. Mr. Calvo served as
Senior Vice President – Real Estate of the Company from January 2009 to June 2015 and was the Company’s Vice President –
Real Estate from October 2004 to January 2009. From 2001 to 2004 Mr. Calvo worked in the real estate development business
in Central America, and from 1994 to 1997 in engineering and construction.
Frank Diaz has been Executive Vice President – Logistics and Distribution since November 2015. Mr. Diaz served as
Senior Vice President – Logistics and Distribution from February 2010 to October 2015 and was the Company’s Vice President
– Logistics and Distribution from September 2008 to February 2010. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Diaz worked more than
20 years in progressively responsible positions in the areas of logistics operations, strategic planning, commercial development
and customer experience with top-tier logistics companies including United Parcel Service, Federal Express and DHL.
Brud E. Drachman has been Executive Vice President – Construction and Facilities since August 2013, was Executive
Vice President—Construction Management of the Company from November 2005 until July 2013, served as Executive Vice
President—Real Estate and Construction of the Company from February 2005 through October 2005 and as Executive Vice
President—Construction and Private Label Merchandising from November 2004 until January 2005. Mr. Drachman served as
Executive Vice President— Real Estate and Construction of the Company from November 2002 until October 2004 and served
as Senior Vice President—Real Estate and Construction of the Company from August 1998 to October 2002. Mr. Drachman
previously served as Vice President—Real Estate and Construction at PEI from August 1994 to August 1997. Prior to joining
PEI in 1994, Mr. Drachman served as Project Manager at TPC beginning in 1987.
John M. Heffner has been Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company since January 2004, after
having served as a consultant to the Company on financial matters from September 2003 through December 2003. From February
2000 until August 2003, Mr. Heffner was Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Kyocera Wireless Corp.
Mr. Heffner’s previous professional experience was with Digital Equipment Corporation, where he held a variety of financial
management roles over a 20-year period, and with QUALCOMM Incorporated, where he was a Vice President of Finance from
July 1998 until February 2000.
88
John D. Hildebrandt has been Executive Vice President—Operations of the Company since February 2010.
Mr. Hildebrandt served as Executive Vice President—Central America and Trinidad Operations from March 2009 through
January 2010, as Executive Vice President—Central America Operations from August 2003 until February 2009, as Executive
Vice President—Caribbean and Asia Operations from July 2001 until July 2003 and as Senior Vice President of the Company
from September 2000 until July 2001. Mr. Hildebrandt previously served as Vice President of the Company from September
1998 until August 2000, overseeing operations in Central America. Mr. Hildebrandt served as the Company’s Country Manager
in the Philippines and Panama from August 1997 until August 1998, and as PEI’s Country Manager in the Philippines and Panama
from 1996 until the Company was spun off from PEI in August 1997. Prior to joining PEI as Country Manager in 1996,
Mr. Hildebrandt was a Senior Operations Manager of Price/Costco from 1994 through 1996, and served in various management
roles for TPC beginning in 1979.
William J. Naylon has been Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company since January 2002.
Mr. Naylon served as Executive Vice President—Merchandising of the Company from July 2001 until January 2002 and as
Senior Vice President of the Company from March 1998 until July 2001. From September 1995 through February 1998,
Mr. Naylon was Managing Director for the Company’s licensee warehouse club operation in Indonesia. Prior to joining the
Company, Mr. Naylon was a General Manager for Price/Costco and served in various management roles for TPC.
Francisco Velasco has been Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of the Company since July 2016,
and Chief Ethics and Compliance Officer since October 2016. Mr. Velasco served as Regional Counsel Latin America for
AbbVie Inc., a publicly traded global biopharmaceutical company. At AbbVie, Mr. Velasco was responsible for its legal affairs
in Latin America, managing over a dozen in-house counsel plus supporting staff covering over 20 countries. Mr. Velasco attended
law school in Mexico, has a Masters of Law degree from Georgetown University and has an MBA degree from Duke University.
Jesus Von Chong has been Executive Vice President – Merchandising since September 2016 and was Executive Vice
President – Foods Merchandising from November 2015 through August 2016. He served as Senior Vice President of
Merchandising for Central America beginning in 2003, added Colombia to his responsibilities in March 2011 and the Caribbean
Region in April 2015. He served as a Regional Merchandising Director for Panama, Costa Rica and Dominican Republic in 2000.
He was first employed by the Company as a Buyer in the Company’s operations in Panama in 1996. Mr. Von Chong progressed
to head Buyer in 1998, Warehouse Manager for Via Brasil Operations in 1999 and to Panama’s Country Manager in 2000.
89
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Corporate Offices
9740 Scranton Road
San Diego, CA 92121
(858) 404-8800
Stock Exchange Listing
NASDAQ Global Select Market
Stock Symbol: PSMT
Annual Meeting
Wednesday, February 1, 2017 at 10:00 AM
PriceSmart, Inc. Corporate Headquarters
9740 Scranton Road
San Diego, CA 92121
Transfer Agent
Computershare Shareowner Services LLC
480 Washington Blvd.
Jersey City, NJ 07310
Telephone: (888) 867-6003
TDD for Hearing Impaired: (800) 952-9245
Outside U.S.: (201) 680-6578
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Ernst & Young LLP
4370 La Jolla Village Drive, Suite 500
San Diego, CA 92122
PriceSmart's annual reports to the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form 10-K and any quarterly reports on Form 10-Q,
as amended, will be provided free of charge upon written request to Investor Relations, PriceSmart, Inc., 9740 Scranton Road.,
San Diego, CA 92121. Internet users can access PriceSmart's web site at http://www.pricesmart.com.
90
DIRECTORS & OFFICERS OF PRICESMART, INC.
Robert E. Price
Sherry Bahrambeygui
Gonzalo Barrutieta
Gordon Hanson
Katherine Hensley
Leon Janks
Jose Luis Laparte
Mitch Lynn
Pierre Mignault
Edgar Zurcher
Jose Luis Laparte
Rodrigo Calvo
Frank Diaz
Brud E. Drachman
John M. Heffner
John D. Hildebrandt
William J. Naylon
Francisco Velasco
Jesus Von Chong
Chairman of the Board
Vice Chairman
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Chief Executive Officer & President
Executive Vice President, Real Estate
Executive Vice President, Logistics and Distribution
Executive Vice President, Construction & Facilities
Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
Executive Vice President, Operations
Executive Vice President & Chief Operating Officer
Executive Vice President, Secretary & General Counsel
& Chief Compliance Officer
Executive Vice President, & Chief Merchandising Officer
Catherine D. Alvarez - Smith
Ana Luisa Bianchi
Fabiola Burbano-Marin
Bob Coulson
J. Ernesto Grijalva
Glenn E. Harmon
Jose Lopez
Jose Luis Marin
Michael L. McCleary
Atul Patel
Laura Santana
Chris Souhrada
Manrique Ugalde
Pedro Vera
J. Phillip Wilson
Benjamin M. Woods
Senior Vice President, International Controller
Senior Vice President, Merchandising – Local Latin America
Senior Vice President, Global Human Resources
Senior Vice President, Merchandising – U.S. Non-Foods
Senior Vice President, Latin America & Caribbean Legal Affairs
Senior Vice President, Bakery and Food Service
Senior Vice President, Merchandising – Fresh Foods
Senior Vice President, Marketing & Member Services
Senior Vice President, Corporate Controller
Senior Vice President, Treasurer
Senior Vice President, Information Technology
Senior Vice President, Operations – Central America
Senior Vice President, Business Development
Senior Vice President, Operations – South America
Senior Vice President, Merchandising – U.S. Hardlines
Senior Vice President, Distribution
Linda C. Brickson
Guadalupe Cefalu
Eduardo Franceschi
Paul Kovaleski
Jonathan Mendoza
Michelle Obediente
Kelly Orme
Eric Torres
Melissa Twohey
Vice President, U.S. Controller
Vice President, Financial Planning & Analysis
Vice President, Operations – Central America
Vice President, Operations – Caribbean
Vice President, Construction and Facilities
Vice President, Merchandising – Regional Foods
Vice President, Merchandising – U.S. Electronics/E-Commerce
Vice President, Facility Maintenance and Equipment
Vice President, Merchandising – U.S. Foods
91
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
®