Quarterlytics / Consumer Defensive / Discount Stores / PriceSmart

PriceSmart

psmt · NASDAQ Consumer Defensive
Claim this profile
Ticker psmt
Exchange NASDAQ
Sector Consumer Defensive
Industry Discount Stores
Employees 1001-5000
← All annual reports
FY2017 Annual Report · PriceSmart
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
B u s i n e s s M e m b e r

Diamond Member

2017

Annual Repor t

November 14, 2017

Dear PriceSmart Stockholders:

For the  fiscal  year ending August 31, 2017, our company recorded sales of $2.9 billion, a 3.2% increase
compared to the prior year of $2.8 billion.  Earnings per share for fiscal 2017 were $2.98 per share compared to $2.92 
per share a year earlier. We ended the year with a strong balance sheet: $162 million in cash and equivalents and a 
.15:1 debt to equity ratio.

With the recent opening of our seventh location in Costa Rica, there are now 40 PriceSmart warehouse clubs
operating in 13 countries with combined sales of $3.0 billion. Construction is proceeding on what will be our fourth 
location in the Dominican Republic scheduled to open in the spring of 2018. In addition, we have other locations in 
various stages of negotiation and due diligence. We look forward to announcing future locations as soon as all permits
have been approved. We are also in various stages of improving existing PriceSmart warehouse clubs to better serve 
our members either by increasing the size of our buildings, adding parking, or both in Guatemala, Panama, Costa Rica 
and Jamaica.

mm

During the year we strengthened our distribution and logistics operation. In April, we acquired a 325,000 
square foot cross-dock facility in Miami built to support our growth and increase productivity in the shipment of U.S. 
merchandise to our markets. More recently we leased a 160,000 square foot distribution center in Costa Rica with a 
planned move in date of spring 2018 to reduce costs as we handle an increasing level of merchandise directly shipping 
to our markets. In addition to receiving full containers and truckloads of vendor specific products for redistribution to 
PriceSmart locations in Central America, this distribution center will have a packaging department and an area for 
fulfilling online orders. We are evaluating the benefits of opening additional distribution centers in our larger markets
as we evolve our logistics strategy.

We are also beginning to identify an expanded assortment of products and services for our more than 3 million
PriceSmart cardholders. We recently introduced special pricing on car rentals from Hertz and we are piloting our first 
two optical departments. We are also preparing to launch an updated and improved online shopping platform that will
focus on both business products for our business members and other merchandise for all of our members.

Our company is not only implementing a strategy to augment our traditional “brick and mortar” business 
with online shopping, we are addressing the required technology improvements needed in our back office. We will
soon  be  approving  a  major  investment  as  we  move  to  a  new  ERP,  the  computer  technology  required  to  operate  a 
business of our size and complexity. Not only do we need to address our ERP, we recognize the importance of full
d
utilization of technology to create back office and operational efficiencies and to take advantage of our data to better 
serve our members in the future.

We  continue  to  research  expansion  opportunities  into  new  Latin  American  markets.  Our  hesitancy  for 
expanding  to  new  countries  has  been  our  concern  about  the  availability  of  real  estate  sites  to  locate  PriceSmart 
locations. We are working to identify sites that can fit our needs. 

Our  management team, along  with the entire 8,000 member team of PriceSmart employees, are doing an 
outstanding job dedicating their working lives to the success of PriceSmart and supporting the values we hold  dear.
We want to especially recognize our Chief Financial Officer, John Heffner, who has announced that he will be retiring
in  2018. John  has  served  as  our  CFO  for  14  years,  arriving  at  PriceSmart  in  2003  when  our  company  was  living 
through very tough times. John’s leadership and commitment during those difficult days and ever since has contributed
immensely to our company’s growth and success. We will miss John and thank him for his years of service.

Along with operating our warehouse club business, we are actively involved in strengthening the social fabric 
in the countries where we operate PriceSmart warehouse clubs. With the financial support of Price Philanthropies, the 
Price family’s private foundation, we provide the entire school needs for over 100,000 children in countries where
PriceSmart warehouse clubs are located. We also make annual donations to nearly 200 social service agencies.

As  we  go  forward  in  fiscal  year  2018  and  beyond,  we  expect  to  capitalize  on  the  many  opportunities  to
improve  and  grow  our  business  by  adhering  to  the  basic  warehouse  club  values  and  practices  and  continuing  to 
innovate and evolve our business template.

On behalf of myself, our CEO Jose Luis Laparte, and our Board of Directors, best wishes for a wonderful 

holiday season and a healthy and happy New Year.

Sincerely,

Robert E. Price

  
 
PRICESMART, INC.

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND
OTHER INFORMATION
August 31, 2017

Selected Financial Data
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of August 31, 2017 and 2016
Consolidated Statements of Income for each of the three years in the period ended August 31, 2017
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for each of the three years in the period ended August 31, 2017
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for each of the three years in the period ended August 31, 2017
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the three years in the period ended August 31, 2017
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Additional Information
Directors & Officers of PriceSmart, Inc.

Page
1 
3 
32 
33 
35 
36 
37 
38 
F-40
76 
79 
80 

i

PRICESMART, INC.

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The  selected  consolidated  financial  data  presented  below is  derived  from  the  Company's  consolidated  financial 
statements and accompanying notes. This selected financial data should be read in conjunction with “Management's Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the consolidated financial statements and accompanying 
notes thereto included elsewhere in this report.

2017

Years Ended August 31,
2015
(in thousands, except income per common share)

2014

2016

2013

OPERATING RESULTS DATA:
Net warehouse club sales 
Export sales
Membership income
Other income 
Total revenues
Total cost of goods sold 
Total selling, general and administrative 
Preopening expenses
Loss (gain) on disposal of assets
Operating income
Total other income (expense)
Income before provision for income taxes and 
income (loss) of unconsolidated affiliates 
Provision for income taxes
Income (loss) of unconsolidated affiliates
Net income
INCOME PER COMMON SHARE -
BASIC:
Basic net income per share
INCOME PER COMMON SHARE -
DILUTED:
Diluted net income per share
Weighted average common shares - basic

$  2,910,062
 34,244
 47,743
 4,579
 2,996,628
 2,519,752
 338,642
 44
 1,961
 136,229
 (3,486)

$  2,820,740
 33,813
 45,781
 4,842
 2,905,176
 2,449,626
 316,474
 1,191
 1,162
 136,723
 (5,483)

$  2,721,132
 33,279
 43,673
 4,519
 2,802,603
 2,352,839
 297,656
 3,737
 2,005
 146,366
 (9,770)

$  2,444,314
 31,279
 38,063
 3,911
 2,517,567
 2,113,664
 262,420
 3,331
 1,445
 136,707
 (2,458)

$  2,239,266
 23,059
 33,820
 3,667
 2,299,812
 1,929,428
 240,924
 1,525
 889
 127,046
 (3,835)

 132,743
 (42,018)
 (1)
 90,724

$

 131,240
 (42,849)
 332
 88,723

$

 136,596
 (47,566)
 94
 89,124

$

 134,249
 (41,372)
 9
 92,886

$

 123,211
 (38,942)
 (4)
 84,265

 2.98

$

 2.92

$

 2.95

$

 3.07

$

 2.78

 2.98
 30,020

$

 2.92
 29,928

$

 2.95
 29,848

$

 3.07
 29,747

$

 2.78
 29,647

$

$

$

Weighted average common shares - diluted

 30,023

 29,933

 29,855

 29,757

 29,657

1

 
 
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA- (Continued)

BALANCE SHEET DATA:
Cash and cash equivalents
Restricted cash
Total assets
Long-term debt
Total PriceSmart stockholders’ equity
Dividends paid on common stock(1)

2017

2016

As of August 31,
2015
(in thousands)

2014

2013

$
 162,434
 3,278
$
$  1,177,514
 106,297
$
 708,767
$
 21,285
$

$
 199,522
 3,194
$
$  1,096,735
 88,107
$
 638,071
$
 21,274
$

$
$
$
$
$
$

 157,072
 1,525
 991,224
 90,534
 566,584
 21,126

$
$
$
$
$
$

 137,098
 29,366
 937,338
 91,439
 548,265
 21,144

$
$
$
$
$
$

 121,874
 40,759
 826,039
 73,020
 481,049
 18,133

(1) On February 1, 2017, February 3, 2016, February 4, 2015, January 23, 2014, and November 27, 2012, the Company declared

cash dividends on its common stock.

2

  
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

tt

r

This annual report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements concerning PriceSmart Inc.'s ("PriceSmart", the 
"Company" or "we") anticipated future revenues and earnings, adequacy of future cash flows, proposed warehouse club openings, 
the Company's performance relative to competitors and related matters. These forward-looking statements include, but are not 
limited to, statements containing the  words “expect,” “believe,” “will,” “may,” “should,” “project,” “estimate,” “anticipated,”
“scheduled,” and like expressions, and the negative thereof. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could
cause actual results to differ materially, including the following risks: our financial performance is dependent on international 
operations, which exposes us to various risks; any failure by us to manage our widely dispersed operations could adversely affect 
our  business;  we  face  significant  competition;  future  sales  growth  depends,  in  part,  on  our  ability  to  successfully  open  new 
warehouse clubs and grow sales in our existing locations; we might not identify in a timely manner or effectively respond to
changes in consumer preferences for merchandise, which could adversely affect our relationship with members, demand for our 
products and market share; although  we offer limited online shopping to our members in certain  markets, our sales could be
adversely affected if one or more major international online retailers were to enter our markets or if other competitors were t
o 
offer a superior online experience; failure to grow our e-commerce business through the integration of physical and digital retail
or otherwise, and the cost of our increasing e-commerce investments, may materially adversely affect our market position, net
d risks
sales and financial performance; our profitability is vulnerable to cost increases; we face difficulties in the shipment of, an
inherent in the importation of, merchandise to our warehouse clubs; we are exposed to weather and other natural disaster risks
that might not be adequately compensated by insurance; negative economic conditions could adversely impact our business in
various respects; our failure to maintain our brand and reputation could adversely affect our results of operations; we face the risk 
of exposure to product liability claims, a product recall and adverse publicity; we are subject to risks associated with possible
changes in our relationships with third parties with which we do business, as well as the performance of such third parties; we
could be subject to additional tax liabilities or subject to reserves on the recoverability of tax receivables; we face the possibility 
of operational interruptions related to union work stoppages; we are subject to volatility in foreign currency exchange rates and 
limits  on  our  ability  to  convert  foreign  currencies  into  U.S.  dollars;  we  face  compliance  risks  related  to  our  international 
operations; we rely extensively on computer systems to process transactions, summarize results and manage our business. Failure
to adequately maintain our systems and disruptions in our systems could harm our business and adversely affect our results of 
operations; we may experience difficulties implementing our new global enterprise resource planning system; any failure by us 
to maintain the security of the information that we hold relating to our company, members, employees and vendors, whether as a 
result of cybersecurity attacks on our information systems, failure of internal controls, employee negligence or malfeasance or
otherwise, could damage our reputation with members, employees, vendors and others, could disrupt our operations, could cause
us to incur substantial additional costs and to become subject to litigation and could materially adversely affect our operating 
results; we are subject to payment related risks; failure to attract and retain qualified employees, increases in wage and benefit
costs, changes in laws and other labor issues could materially adversely affect our financial performance; changes in accounting
standards and assumptions, projections, estimates and judgments by management related to complex accounting matters could 
significantly affect our financial condition and results of operations; a few of our stockholders own approximately 25.3% of our uu
voting stock as of August 31, 2017, which may make it difficult to complete some corporate transactions without their support
and may impede a change in control. The risks described above as well as the other risks detailed in the Company’s U.S. Securities 
and Exchange  Commission (“SEC”) reports, including the  Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K  filed  for the  fiscal  year 
ended August 31, 2017 filed on October 26, 2017, pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, see “Part I - Item 1A - Risk 
Factors,” could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. These risks are not the
only risks that the Company faces. The Company could also be affected by additional factors that apply to all companies operati
ng
ff
globally  and  in  the  U.S.,  as  well  as  other  risks  that  are  not  presently  known  to  the  Company  or  that  the  Company  currently
considers to be immaterial. 

3

Our business consists primarily of operating international membership shopping warehouse clubs similar to, but smaller 
in size than, warehouse clubs in the United States.  We operate in 13 countries/territories that are located in Latin America and 
the  Caribbean.    Our  ownership  in  all  operating  subsidiaries  as  of  August 31,  2017  is  100%,  and  they  are  presented  on  a 
consolidated basis.  The number of warehouse clubs in operation as of August 31, 2017 for each country or territory are as follows:

a

Country/Territory
Colombia
Costa Rica
Panama
Trinidad
Dominican Republic
Guatemala
Honduras
El Salvador
Nicaragua
Aruba
Barbados
U.S. Virgin Islands
Jamaica
Totals

Number of

Number of

Warehouse Clubs Warehouse Clubs
in Operation as of
in Operation as of
August 31, 2017
August 31, 2016
 6
 6
 5
 4
 3
 3
 3
 2
 2
 1
 1
 1
 1
 38

 7
 6
 5
 4
 3
 3
 3
 2
 2
 1
 1
 1
 1
 39

Actual and Anticipated
warehouse
club openings
in fiscal year 2018

 —
 1
 —
 —
 1
 —
 —
 —
 —
 —
 —
 —
 —
 2

  We constructed and opened a new warehouse club in Chia, Colombia, in September 2016 (fiscal year 2017) on land 
we acquired in May 2015, bringing the total of warehouse clubs operating in Colombia to seven. In April 2015, we acquired land
in Managua, Nicaragua.  We constructed and then opened a warehouse club on this site in November 2015 of fiscal year 2016 
bringing the total number of warehouse clubs operating in Nicaragua to two. 

On February 1, 2017,  we acquired land in  Santa Ana, Costa Rica upon  which  we opened a new  warehouse club on 
October 5, 2017, fiscal year 2018.  This new warehouse club brings the number of PriceSmart warehouse clubs operating in Costa 
Rica to seven. In June 2017, we acquired land in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic. We are currently building a warehouse
club on this site that we expect to open in the spring of calendar year 2018. This will bring the number of PriceSmart warehouse
clubs operating in Dominican Republic to four. We continue to explore other potential sites for future warehouse clubs in Central 
America, the Caribbean and Colombia.

Our warehouse clubs and local distribution centers are located in Latin America and the Caribbean, and our corporate
headquarters, U.S. buying operations and regional distribution centers are located primarily in the United States.  Our operating 
segments are the United States, Central America, the Caribbean and Colombia.

General Market Factors

Our  sales  and  profits  vary  from  market  to  market  depending  on  general  economic  factors,  including  GDP  growth; 
consumer  spending  patterns;  foreign  currency  exchange  rates;  political  policies  and  social  conditions;  local  demographic 
characteristics (such as population growth); the number of years PriceSmart has operated in a particular market; and the level of 
retail and wholesale competition in that market.

Currency fluctuations can be the largest variable affecting our overall sales and profit performance, as we experienced 
in fiscal year 2015 and 2016, as many of our markets are susceptible to foreign currency exchange rate volatility.  During fiscal 
year 2017, approximately 77% of our net warehouse sales were in markets whose functional currency is other than the U.S. dollar. 
Of these sales, approximately 52% were comprised of sales of products we purchased in U.S. dollars. 

f

Currency  fluctuations  within  our Colombia  market  adversely affected our consolidated results of operations  in prior
fiscal years. Major changes in the value of the Colombian peso (“COP”) relative to the U.S. dollar negatively impacted sales and 
margins in that market during fiscal years 2015 and 2016.  For example, in fiscal year 2016, the devaluation of the Colombian
peso against the U.S. dollar resulted in decreased U.S. dollar reported warehouse club sales for that market, after translation, by 
approximately 26% when compared to fiscal year 2015, following an approximately 60% devaluation that occurred in fiscal year 
2015.  A devaluation of the COP not only reduces the value of sales and membership income that is generated in Colombia when

4

 
translated to U.S. dollars for our consolidated results, but also increases the local currency price of imported merchandise, whichww
impacts  demand  for  a  significant  portion  of  the  Company’s  merchandise  offering.  This,  along  with  the  fact  that  we  are  still
relatively new in the  Colombian market, and the  sophisticated level of competition in that market, impacted overall business 
performance resulting in an operating loss in Colombia in fiscal years 2015 and 2016. A stabilization of the currency during fiscal
year 2017 has contributed to improving business conditions in Colombia, resulting in good sales growth and a return to operating
profitability in our Colombia segment.

Certain of our Central American and Caribbean markets have experienced some slowing of overall economic activity 
during  the  fiscal  year  which  may  continue  to  impact  the  level  of  consumer  spending  in  the  coming  months. In  particular,
Trinidad’s economy, with its dependence on oil and gas exports as a major source of income and resulting government policy to
manage its foreign exchange reserves, has been experiencing overall difficult economic conditions with a corresponding impact
on consumer spending. Other countries where general market conditions have provided a difficult operating environment which
USVI where Hurricanes Irma and Maria had a severe impact 
we expect may continue into fiscal year 2018 include Barbados, and 
on the infrastructure of the island. 

r

Our capture of retail and wholesale sales can vary from market to market due to competition and the availability of other 
shopping options for our members.  In larger, more developed countries, such as Costa Rica, Panama and Colombia, customers
have many alternatives available to them to satisfy their shopping needs, and therefore, our market share is less than in other
smaller countries, such as Jamaica and Nicaragua, where consumers have a limited number of shopping options.

Demographic characteristics within each of our markets can also affect both the overall level of sales and also future 
sales growth opportunities.  Island countries such as Aruba, Barbados and the U.S. Virgin Islands offer us limited upside for sales
growth given their overall market size.  Countries with a smaller upper and middle class consumer population, such as Honduras,
El  Salvador,  Jamaica  and  Nicaragua,  also  have  a  more  limited  potential  opportunity  for  sales  growth  as  compared  to  more
developed countries with larger upper and middle class consumer populations.

Political and other factors in each of our  markets  may have significant effects on our business.  For example,  when 
national elections are being held, the political situation can introduce uncertainty about how the leadership change may impact
the economy and affect near-term consumer spending. The need for increased tax revenue in certain countries can cause changes
in  tax  policies  affecting  consumer’s  personal  tax  rates,  and/or  added  consumption  taxes,  such  as  VAT  (value-added  taxes)
effectively raising the prices of various products.

From time to time we have experienced a lack of availability of U.S. dollars in certain markets (U.S. dollar illiquidity). 
This impedes our ability to convert local currencies obtained through warehouse sales into U.S. dollars to settle the U.S. dollar 
liabilities  associated  with  our  imported  products,  increasing  our  foreign  exchange  exposure  to  any  devaluation  of  the  local 
currency relative to the U.S. dollar.  During fiscal year 2017 and continuing into fiscal year 2018, we experienced this situation
in Trinidad (“TT”).  We have been and continue to work with our banks in Trinidad to source tradable currencies (including Euros
and Canadian dollars), but until the central bank in Trinidad makes more U.S. dollars available, this illiquidity condition is likely 
to continue. During part of the first half of fiscal year 2017 we limited shipments of merchandise to Trinidad from our distribution 
center  in  Miami  to  levels  that  generally  aligned  with  our  Trinidad  subsidiary’s  ability  to  source  U.S.  dollars  to  pay  for  that
merchandise. This resulted in a reduced level of shipments, which negatively affected sales in the second quarter, particularly 
December, although by less than our initial estimate. These actions did not impact the level of merchandise we obtain locally in
Trinidad.  Starting in the third quarter of fiscal year 2017, we were able to improve our sourcing of tradeable currencies, which,
in addition to other steps we took, allowed for a more normalized flow of imported merchandise during the third and fourth fiscal
quarters.  As of August 31, 2017, our Trinidad subsidiary had net U.S. dollar denominated assets of approximately $4.0 million.
However, the illiquidity situation remains in the Trinidad market, and we could face similar issues in sourcing U.S. dollars during
the first and second quarters of fiscal year 2018, which may require us to limit shipments from the U.S. to Trinidad in line with
our ability to exchange Trinidad dollars for tradeable currencies to manage our exposure to any potential devaluation.  

u

Business Strategy

Our business strategy is to operate membership warehouse clubs in Latin America and the Caribbean.  We sell a limited 
number of high volume products and services across a broad range of categories to business and families at the lowest possible 
prices.   PriceSmart  members  pay  an  annual  membership  fee,  and  that  fee, combined  with  volume  purchasing  and  operating
efficiencies throughout the supply chain, enable us to operate our business very efficiently  with lower margins and prices than 
conventional retail stores and wholesale suppliers.  

ff

While our traditional membership warehouse club strategy continues to work well in our markets, we recognize that 
technology is having an increasingly profound impact on shopping habits throughout the world.  We believe our business strategy
needs to be broadened to respond to changes in shopping habits so our members will have the shopping experience they desire.

5

Our  longer  range  strategic  objective  is  to  combine  the  traditional  membership  warehouse  club  “brick  and  mortar”

business with online shopping to provide the best shopping experience possible for our members.

Current and Future Management Actions

Generally, our operating efficiencies, earnings and cash flow improve as sales increase.  Higher sales provide greater 
purchasing power which often translates into lower cost of merchandise from our suppliers and lower prices for our members.  
Higher sales, coupled with continuous efforts to improve efficiencies through our distribution network and within our warehouse
clubs, also give us the opportunity to leverage our operating costs and reduce prices for our members.

u

We seek to grow sales by increasing transaction size and shopping frequency of our members by providing high quality, 
differentiated merchandise at a good value.  We also grow sales by attracting new members and improving the capacity of our 
through physical expansions
f
existing warehouse clubs to serve the growing membership base and level of
of the building or adding additional parking or improving the flow of merchandise to and within the warehouse club. Sales growt
h
w
is also achieved when we add new warehouse clubs with a corresponding increase in members in those markets that can support
that growth.  Sales during fiscal year 2017 were positively impacted by the addition of a new warehouse club that opened in Chia,
Colombia in September 2016, fiscal year 2017. Although we recognize that opening new warehouse club locations in certain 
existing markets can have adverse short-term implications for comparable store growth, as the new warehouse club will often
attract sales from existing locations, each decision to add a location in an existing market is based on a long-term outlook.  Overall,
for fiscal year 2017, net warehouse sales increased 3.2% when compared to fiscal year 2016. Finally, in the future we believe
that technology supported online sales will constitute a significant opportunity to grow sales. 

sales in those locations 

One of the distinguishing features of the warehouse club format is the role membership plays, both in terms of pricing
and member loyalty.  Membership fees are considered a component of overall gross margin and therefore allow us to reduce
merchandise prices.  In most of our markets, the annual membership fee is the equivalent of U.S. $35 for both business members
and non-business “Diamond” members.  In Colombia, the membership fee has been 65,000 (COP) (including VAT) since our 
initial entrance into the Colombian market.  The Colombian peso (COP) was trading at approximately 2,000 COP to $1.00 US 
dollar at that time.  More recently, the Colombian peso has been trading at approximately 3,000 COP to $1.00 US dollar so that 
the converted membership price in U.S. dollars decreased from approximately U.S. $30 to approximately U.S. $20.  In February,
we raised the membership fee in Colombia to 75,000 COP moving the converted membership price to approximately U.S. $25. 
In addition to the standard warehouse club membership, we have offered in Costa Rica what we call Platinum membership since 
2012  for  $75.   A  Platinum  membership  earns  a  2%  rebate  on  annual  purchases  up  to  a  maximum  $500  rebate  per  year.  In 
September, fiscal year 2018, we introduced the Platinum membership in Panama and plan on adding a Platinum membership 
level in the Dominican Republic in the next few months. We are considering expanding Platinum membership to other PriceSmart 
markets and may do so during fiscal year 2018.

Logistics and distribution efficiencies are an important part of what allows us to deliver high quality merchandise at low 
prices to our members.  We acquire a significant amount of merchandise internationally, which we receive primarily at our Miami
distribution centers.  In January 2017, we purchased a distribution center in Medley, Miami-Dade County, Florida, into which we
transferred our Miami dry distribution center activities from a leased facility during the third quarter of fiscal year 2017.  This
new  distribution  facility  will  increase  our  ability  to  efficiently  receive,  handle  and  distribute  merchandise.  We  then  ship  the
merchandise either directly to our warehouse clubs or to regional distribution centers located in some of our larger markets. Our
ability to efficiently receive, handle and distribute merchandise to the point where our members put that merchandise into their
shopping carts has a significant impact on our level of operating expenses and ultimately how low we can price our merchandise.
We continue to explore ways to improve efficiency, reduce costs and ensure a good flow of merchandise to our warehouse clubs.
As we continue to refine our logistics and distribution infrastructure, we are investing in regional distribution centers. We r
ecently 
rr
entered into a long-term lease for a 107,640 square foot distribution center in Costa Rica, with the expectation that this distribution 
center will improve the merchandise flow and in-stock conditions in our warehouse clubs, reduce merchandise costs and facilitat
e 
online sales to our members in Costa Rica. 

u

Purchasing land and constructing warehouse clubs is generally our largest ongoing capital investment.  Securing land 
for warehouse club locations is challenging within our markets, especially in Colombia, because suitable sites at economically 
feasible prices are difficult to find.  While our preference is to own rather than lease real estate, we have entered into real estate 
leases  in  certain  cases  (most  recently  our  Bogota,  Colombia  site)  and  will  likely  do  so  in  the  future.    Real  estate  ownership 
provides a number of advantages as compared to leasing, including lower operating expenses, flexibility to expand or otherwise 
enhance our buildings, long-term control over the use of the property and the residual value that the real estate may have in future
years.  In order to secure warehouse club locations, we occasionally have purchased more land than is actually needed for the
warehouse club facility.  To the extent that we acquire property in excess of what is needed for a particular warehouse club, we
generally have looked to either sell or develop the excess property.  Excess land at Alajuela (Costa Rica) and Brisas (Panama) is 
being developed by joint ventures formed by us and the sellers of the property.  We are employing a similar development strategy
for the excess land at the San Fernando, Trinidad and Arroyo Hondo, Dominican Republic locations where the properties are

ff

6

  
fully owned by us.  The profitable sale or development of real estate not required to operate a warehouse club is highly dependent 
on real estate market conditions.

We are currently engaged in the selection of a new global enterprise resource planning system (ERP) and evaluating 
other technology-related investments with the long-term objective of offering our members a seamless multi-channel experience. 
f
To oversee our efforts to identify and adopt new technologies that can help us better serve our members, our Board of Directors
t
has  approved  a  new  sub-committee  within  our  Board,  the  Innovation  Committee.   The  committee  members  include  Board 
Chairman Robert Price as Chairman of the committee, our CEO Jose Luis Laparte and two other members of our Board.  The 
Board of Directors has designated an incremental $3.0 to $5.0 million of technology-related spending for fiscal year 2018 for 
evaluation  and  selection  of  the ERP  vendor  and  to  fund  a  newly  established  team  to  direct  our  technology  investment  and 
preopening spending to develop a new online business that we hope to launch during the summer of 2018. Substantially all of 
this spending for fiscal year 2018 will be recorded as expenses on the statement of income that will impact earnings during the
upcoming fiscal year as we pursue these long-term initiatives, which will likely require further investments beyond the current
fiscal year.

Financial highlights for the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2017 included: 

(cid:120) Net warehouse club sales increased 3.6% over the comparable prior year period. We ended the quarter with 39 warehouse

(cid:120)

clubs compared to 38 warehouse clubs at the end of the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2016.  
Comparable  warehouse club  sales (that is, sales in the  warehouse clubs that  have been  open for greater than 13 1/2
calendar months) for the 13 weeks ended September 3, 2017 increased 1.9%.

(cid:120) Membership income for the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2017 increased 5.3% to $12.2 million.
(cid:120) Warehouse gross profits (net warehouse club sales less associated cost of goods sold) in the quarter increased 2.4%  over 
the prior-year period, and warehouse gross profits as a percent of net warehouse club sales were 14.6%, a decrease of 1
basis point (0.01%) from the same period last year.

(cid:120) Operating income for the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2017 was $30.8 million, a decrease of $2.0 million compared to 

the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2016. 

(cid:120) Our effective tax rate increased in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2017 to 33.9% from 30.4% in the fourth quarter of 

fiscal year 2016.  

(cid:120) Net income for the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2017 was $19.8 million, or $0.64 per diluted share, compared to $22.3

million, or $0.74 per diluted share, in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2016. 

Financial highlights for fiscal year 2017 included:

(cid:120) Net warehouse club sales increased 3.2% over the comparable prior year period.  We ended the year with 39 warehouse 
clubs compared to 38 warehouse clubs at the end of the fiscal year 2016.  Comparable warehouse club sales (that is, 
sales  in  the  warehouse  clubs  that  have  been  open  for  greater  than  13  1/2  calendar  months)  for  the  52  weeks  ended 
September 3, 2017 increased 1.5%.

(cid:120) Membership income for the fiscal year 2017 increased 4.3% to $47.7 million.
(cid:120) Warehouse gross profits (net warehouse club sales less associated cost of goods sold)  increased 4.8% over the same
prior year period and warehouse gross profits as a percent of net warehouse club sales were 14.5%, an increase of 23 
basis points (0.23%) from the same period last year.

f

(cid:120) Operating income for fiscal year 2017 was $136.2 million, a decrease of $494,000 million compared to fiscal year 2016.
Currency exchange transactions in the current year resulted in a $1.2 million gain compared to an $899,000  net loss 
(cid:120)
from currency exchange transactions last year.
The effective tax rate for fiscal year 2017 is 31.7%, as compared to the effective tax rate for fiscal year 2016 of 32.6%.  
(cid:120)
(cid:120) Net income for fiscal year 2017 was $90.7 million, or $2.98 per diluted share, compared to $88.7 million, or $2.92 per 

diluted share, in the prior year.

Financial highlights for fiscal year 2016 included:

(cid:120) Net warehouse club sales increased 3.7% over the comparable prior year period. 
(cid:120)

Comparable  warehouse club  sales (that is, sales in the  warehouse clubs that  have been  open for greater than 13 1/2
calendar months) for the 53 weeks ended September 4, 2016 decreased 0.8%.
(cid:120) Membership income for the fiscal year 2016 increased 4.8% to $45.8 million.
(cid:120) Warehouse gross profits (net warehouse club sales less associated cost of goods sold) increased 0.8% over the prior year 
period and warehouse gross profits as a percent of net warehouse club sales were 14.3%, a decrease of 40 basis points 
(0.40%) from the same period last year.

(cid:120) Operating income for fiscal year 2016 was $136.7 million, a decrease of $(9.6) million compared to fiscal year 2015.
(cid:120) We had a $(900,000) net loss from currency exchange transactions in the current year compared to a $(4.4) million net 

loss from currency exchange transactions last year.

7

  
(cid:120)

The  effective  tax  rate  for  fiscal  year  2016  is  32.6%,  as  compared  to  the  effective  tax  rate  for  fiscal  year  2015  of 
34.8%.  This reduction in the effective tax rate contributed approximately $0.06 per diluted share for the twelve-month
period.

(cid:120) Net income for fiscal year 2016 was $88.7 million, or $2.92 per diluted share, compared to $89.1 million, or $2.95 per 

diluted share, in the prior year.  

Comparison of Fiscal Year 2017 to 2016 and Fiscal Year 2016 to 2015

The  following  discussion  and  analysis  compares  the  results  of  operations  for  each  of  the  three  fiscal  years  ended 
August 31, 2017,  2016, and  2015  and  should  be  read  in  conjunction  with  the  consolidated  financial  statements  and  the
accompanying  notes  included  elsewhere  in  this  report.    Unless  otherwise  noted,  all  tables  present  U.S.  dollar  amounts  in
thousands.  Certain percentages presented are calculated using actual results prior to rounding.  Our operations consist of four 
reportable segments: Central America, the Caribbean, Colombia and the United States.  The Company’s reportable segments are 
based on management’s organization of these locations into operating segments by general geographic location, which are used 
by management and the Company's chief operating decision maker in setting up management lines of responsibility, providing
support services, and making operational decisions and assessments of financial performance.  Segment amounts are presented
after converting to U.S. dollars and consolidating eliminations.  From time to time, we revise the measurement of each segment's
operating  income,  including  certain  corporate  overhead  allocations,  and  other  measures  as  determined  by  the  information
regularly  reviewed  by  our  chief  operating  decision  maker.  When  we  do  so,  the  previous  period  amounts  and  balances  are 
reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation.

Growth

We  measure  our  growth  primarily  by  the  amount  of  the  period-over-period  growth  in  our  net  warehouse  sales,  our
comparable warehouse club sales (which include the impact of e-commerce sales) and our membership income. At times, we
make strategic investments that are focused on the long-term growth of the Company. These investments can impact near-term 
results; such as an opening of a new warehouse club in a market which can reduce reported comparable warehouse sales due to 
the cannibalization of sales from existing warehouse clubs; or negatively impact operating profit and net income, as fixed costs
are added in advance of achieving full projected sales. 

ww

Net Warehouse Club Sales

The following tables indicate the  net  warehouse club sales in the  reportable segments in  which  we operate, and the

percentage growth in net warehouse club sales by segment during fiscal years 2017, 2016 and 2015.

Years Ended

August 31, 2017

August 31, 2016

Central America
Caribbean
Colombia
Net warehouse club sales

Amount
$  1,756,716
 815,264
 338,082
$  2,910,062

% of net
sales
 60.4 % $
 28.0 %
 11.6 %
 100.0 % $

Increase/
(decrease)
from
prior year

 29,954
 (12,842)
 72,210
 89,322

Change

Amount

 1.7 % $  1,726,762
 828,106
 (1.6) %
 265,872
 27.2 %
 3.2 % $  2,820,740

% of net
sales
 61.2 %
 29.4 %
 9.4 %
 100.0 %

Years Ended

August 31, 2016

August 31, 2015

Central America
Caribbean
Colombia
Net warehouse club sales

Amount
$  1,726,762
 828,106
 265,872
$  2,820,740

% of net
sales
 61.2 % $
 29.4 %
 9.4 %
 100.0 % $

Increase/
(decrease)
from
prior year

 130,859
 18,826
 (50,077)
 99,608

Change

Amount

 8.2 % $  1,595,903
 809,280
 2.3 %
 315,949
 (15.8) %
 3.7 % $  2,721,132

% of net
sales
 58.6 %
 29.7 %
 11.6 %
 100.0 %

8

  
Comparison of 2017 and 2016

Overall net warehouse sales growth of 3.2% for fiscal year 2017 compared to fiscal year 2016 resulted from a 2.8% 

increase in transactions and a 1.0% increase in average ticket.

Net warehouse sales in our Central America segment increased 1.7% for fiscal year 2017. General weakness in Costa
Rica, our largest market in that segment, resulted in negative growth there of 2.6%.  All other Central American countries recorded
positive  growth  in  warehouse  sales  for  the  twelve-month  period, with  Panama,  Guatemala,  and  Honduras  all  recording  sales 
growth of between 4-5%. 

Our Caribbean segment had a full-year sales decline of 1.6% driven largely by sales decreases in Trinidad, our largest 
market in that segment. The difficult economic environment there continues to negatively impact consumer spending, and earlier 
in the year, we restricted shipments of U.S. goods for a period of three months as a result of currency illiquidity in the market. 
Trinidad net warehouse club sales for fiscal year 2017 declined 4.8% compared to fiscal year 2016.  The Company is not currently 
limiting shipments to Trinidad, but illiquidity concerns remain, which may again cause us to restrict shipments in the future.

Net warehouse sales in our Colombia segment reported growth with the addition of our new Chia club on September 1, 
2016 contributing to an overall net warehouse club sales growth of 27.2% for the twelve-month peri
od.  With the stabilization of 
the exchange rate between the Colombian peso and the U.S. dollar over the past eighteen months, we have seen an improving
sales picture in all of our warehouse clubs in Colombia. This, coupled with our efforts to source high quality merchandise from
local suppliers, resulted in a 15.2% increase in transactions in the fiscal year and average ticket growth of 10.4%.  During fiscal 
year 2016, the average exchange rate was 3,070 pesos to the dollar, and in the current fiscal year, the rate was 2,983.  

f

Comparison of 2016 and 2015

Net warehouse sales growth resulted from a 6.2% increase in transactions and a 2.4% decrease in the average sale.

Net warehouse sales growth in Central America was positively impacted by the openings of two new warehouse clubs,
one in Panama (June 2015) and one in Nicaragua (November 2015).  All other Central American countries without additional
warehouse clubs also recorded positive sales growth in fiscal year 2016 compared to fiscal year 2015.

The Caribbean segment had no new warehouse clubs opened in the comparable periods and recorded a 2.3% increase in 
net warehouse sales. A significant increase in the number of products subject to Value Added Taxes starting in February in Trinidad
and currency devaluations in both Trinidad and the Dominican Republic (the Company’s two largest markets in the Caribbean 
segment) resulted in a negative sales growth in the second half of the fiscal year compared to the same period last year.

f

Net warehouse sales in Colombia were significantly impacted during the fiscal year by the devaluation of the Colombian
peso relative to the U.S. dollar.  The strength of the U.S. dollar causes the price of imported merchandise to increase in Colombian 
pesos, which reduces sales volumes of those products.  In addition, net warehouse sales made in Colombian pesos when translated
yielded 26% fewer U.S. dollars in the fiscal year compared to the year ago period.  Net warehouse sales in local currency (COP)
for fiscal year 2016 grew 6.0%, reflecting the addition of three new warehouse clubs for fiscal year 2016 compared to fiscal year 
2015 and a stabilizing currency exchange rate in the fourth fiscal quarter of fiscal year 2016.

Net Warehouse Club Sales by Category

The following table indicates the approximate percentage of net sales accounted for by each major category of items

sold us during the fiscal years ended August 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.

Sundries (including health and beauty aids, tobacco, alcoholic beverages,
soft drinks, cleaning and paper products and pet supplies)

Hardlines (including major appliances, small appliances,  electronics,
hardware, office supplies, garden and patio, sporting goods, business
machines and automotive supplies)
Softlines (including apparel, domestics, cameras, jewelry, housewares, 
media, toys and home furnishings)
Other (including food court)

Years Ended August 31,
2016

2015

2017

27 %
53 %

11 %

7 %
2 %
100 %

27 %
53 %

11 %

7 %
2 %
100 %

26 %
54 %

12 %

6 %
2 %
100 %

9

    
  
Comparison of 2017 to 2016

The mix of sales by major category did not change between fiscal year 2017 and 2016.

Comparison of 2016 to 2015

There was a slight shift in the mix of sales by major category between fiscal year 2016 and 2015, with a slight decrease
in food and hardlines compared to the other categories. These categories were impacted more by price compression and the effect
of devaluation in Colombia than the other merchandise categories.

Comparable Sales

We  report  comparable  warehouse  club  sales  on  a  “same  week”  basis  with  13  weeks  in  each  quarter  beginning  on  a 
Monday and ending on a Sunday.  The periods are established at the beginning of the fiscal year to provide as close a match as
possible to the calendar month and quarter that is used for financial reporting purposes.  This approach equalizes the number of 
weekend days and weekdays in each period for improved sales comparison, as we experience higher warehouse club sales on the 
weekends.  Approximately every five years, the Company uses a 53-week year and a six-week “August” to account for the fact 
that 52 weeks is only 364 days.   For fiscal year 2016, we used a 53-week year and a six-week “August.”  Further, each of the 
warehouse clubs used in the calculations was open for at least 13 ½ calendar months before its results for the current period were 
compared with its results for the prior period.  For example, sales related to the warehouse club opened in Colombia on September 
1, 2016 will not be used in the calculation of comparable sales until November 2017. Sales transacted through our e-commerce 
platform are included in our calculation of comparable warehouse sales. 

The following tables indicate the comparable net warehouse club sales in the reportable segments in which we operate, 

u

and the percentage growth in net warehouse club sales by segment during fiscal years 2017 and 2016.

Central America
Caribbean
Colombia
Consolidated segments

Comparison of 2017 to 2016

Years Ended

August 31, 2017
% Increase in comparable
net warehouse sales

August 31, 2016
% Increase in comparable
net warehouse sales

 1.4 %
 (1.2) %
 10.2 %
 1.5 %

 1.6 %
 1.8 %
 (22.9) %
 (0.8) %

Comparable warehouse club sales for those warehouse clubs that were open for at least 13 ½ months for some or all of 
the 52-week period ended September 3, 2017 grew 1.5%.   Colombia recorded the highest comparable  warehouse club sales,
despite some cannibalized sales resulting from the opening of the new warehouse club in Chia, Colombia which is not yet included 
in the calculation of comparable sales. Often times, new warehouse clubs that we open are not far from existing warehouse clubs
u
that are included in the calculation for comparable warehouse club sales, as was the case in Colombia.  The new warehouse clubs
attract new members from areas not previously served by us, but they also create the opportunity for some existing members,
particularly those who now find the new clubs closer to their homes, to shop at the new locations.  This transfer of sales from
existing warehouse clubs that are included in the calculation of comparable warehouse club sales to new warehouse clubs that 
are not included in the calculation can have an adverse impact on reported comparable warehouse club sales.

The Caribbean segment experienced negative comparable net warehouse sales primarily due to the economic downturn 

in Trinidad.  We expect to experience a continued softness in the Trinidad economy during fiscal year 2018.

The Central America segment experienced low single digit growth in comparable sales  primarily due to the  general

weakness in the Costa Rica market.   

Comparison of 2016 to 2015

Comparable warehouse club sales for those warehouse clubs that were open for at least 13 ½ months for some or all of 
the  53  week  period  ending  September  4, 2016  decreased  0.8%,  compared  to  the  same  53-week  period  in  the  prior  year. 
Comparable warehouse sales were negatively impacted by the devaluation of the Colombian peso from the prior-year period.  Six
warehouse clubs in Colombia are included in the calculation of comparable warehouse sales. Excluding those warehouse clubs, 
the 53-week comparable warehouse sales for the other 30 warehouse clubs open for at least 13 ½ months increased 1.7%. We 
opened a new warehouse club west of Panama City, Panama in June 2015 and one in Managua, Nicaragua in November 2015.  

10

 
Membership Income

Years Ended

August 31,
2017

Increase/
(decrease)
from
prior year

Amount

Membership income - Central America
Membership income - Caribbean 
Membership income - Colombia 
Membership income - Total 

$

$

$

 29,832
 11,864
 6,047
 47,743 $

Number of accounts - Central America
Number of accounts - Caribbean
Number of accounts - Colombia
Number of accounts - Total

 829,735
 391,411
 321,693
 1,542,839

 1,264
 250
 448
 1,962

 29,307
 (1,800)
 24,908
 52,415

Membership 
income % to 
net warehouse
club sales

 1.7 % $
 1.5
 1.8
 1.6 % $

% Change
 4.4 %
 2.2
 8.0
 4.3 %

 3.7 %
 (0.5)
 8.4
 3.5 %

Years Ended

August 31,
2016

Increase
(decrease)
from
prior year

Amount

Membership income - Central America 
Membership income - Caribbean 
Membership income - Colombia 
Membership income - Total

$

$

$

 28,568
 11,614
 5,599
 45,781 $

 2,373
 574
 (839)
 2,108

Membership 
 income % to 
net warehouse
club sales

 1.7 % $
 1.4
 2.1
 1.6 % $

% Change
 9.1 %
 5.2
 (13.0)

 4.8 %

Number of accounts - Caribbean
Number of accounts - Colombia
Number of accounts - Total

Comparison of 2017 to 2016

 800,428
 393,211
 296,785
 1,490,424

 45,097
 16,664
 (57,522)
 4,239

 6.0 %
 4.4
 (16.2)

 0.3 %

August 31,
2016

Amount

 28,568
 11,614
 5,599
 45,781

 800,428
 393,211
 296,785
 1,490,424

August 31,
2015

Amount

 26,195
 11,040
 6,438
 43,673

 755,331
 376,547
 354,307
 1,486,185

Membership income is recognized ratably over the one-year life of the membership. The increase in membership income
primarily reflects a growth in membership accounts for which income is recognized during the last twelve months. The average
number of member accounts during the fiscal year was 3.0% higher than the year before. The income recognized per average
member  account  increased  1.5%.  In  February  2017,  we  increased  the  annual  membership  fee  in  Colombia  by  15.4%  to  the
equivalent  of  U.S.  $25  (at  the  year-end  exchange  rate  of  2,937  Colombian  pesos  per  U.S.  dollar),  which  had  the  effect  of 
increasing the membership income per average membership account in Colombia by 5.1%.

The growth in membership accounts from the end of fiscal year 2016 to the end of the current fiscal year in Colombia 
was primarily attributable to the new warehouse club in Chia which opened on September 1, 2016.   The Company’s twelve-
month renewal rate for the period ended August 31, 2017 improved to 85% from 80% for the twelve months ended August 31, 
2016.  

Comparison of 2016 to 2015

The increase in membership income primarily reflects a growth in membership accounts for which income is recognized
during fiscal year 2016. The average number of member accounts during the fiscal year was 7.6% higher than the year before. 
The  income  recognized  per  average  member  account  decreased  0.3%,  which  primarily  reflects  the  effect  of  the  impact  of 
devaluation in Colombia on the translation of membership fees in local currency to U.S. dollars. In Colombia, the membership is
priced in Colombian pesos (COP). At the August 2016 exchange rate, a membership in Colombia yielded approximately $19 

11

compared to approximately $35 in most other countries. We ended the fiscal year with a renewal rate of 80% for the twelve-
month period ended August 31, 2016.

ww

During fiscal year 2016, the Company experienced a net growth in membership accounts of 4,239 accounts, or 0.3%. 
Colombia’s membership accounts during the fiscal year declined 57,522, while the other countries grew by 61,761 accounts. The
decrease in overall accounts in Colombia was due to the first anniversary date for a large number of accounts associated with the 
three warehouse clubs in Colombia that opened in October and November 2015 and the low renewal rate for those accounts.  The
opening  of  these  three  warehouse  clubs  in  fiscal  year  2015  resulted  in  approximately  124,000  expiring  accounts  in  October, 
November  and  December from  the  record  number  of  new  member  sign-ups  experienced  at  the  opening  of  these  clubs.  As
expected,  we experienced a low renewal rate  for those expiring accounts due to a historically low renewal rate  for first  year 
members across our markets, the distance of our warehouse clubs in Bogota and Medellin to where certain members live, and the 
impact of price increases on imported products due to the Colombian peso devaluation.  While we continue to see new member 
sign-ups in Colombia, and an improving renewal rate of current members in Colombia, the twelve-month renewal rate is impacted 
by those non-renewals earlier in the fiscal year.   The Company’s twelve-month renewal rate for the period ended August 31,
2016 declined to 80% from 86% for the twelve months ended August 31, 2015.  Excluding Colombia, the twelve-month renewal
rate was 87% as of August 31, 2016, consistent with 87% in August 2015, November 2015, and February 2016. 

Results of Operations

Results of Operations Consolidated

Results of Operations Consolidated
(Amounts in thousands, except percentages and number of 
warehouse clubs)
Net warehouse club sales
Warehouse club sales gross margin
Warehouse club gross margin percentage
Total revenues
Percentage change from prior period
Total comparable warehouse club sales increase (decrease)
Total gross margin
Gross margin percentage to total revenues
Selling, general and administrative
Selling, general and administrative percentage of total 
revenues
Operating income - Central America 
Operating income - Caribbean 
Operating income - Colombia 
Operating Income - United States
Reconciling Items (3)
Operating income - Total 
Operating income as a percentage of total revenues
Warehouse clubs at period end
Warehouse club square feet at period end

August 31,
2017

Years Ended
August 31,
2016

August 31, 
2015

$
$

$

$

$

$
$
$
$
$
$

$
$

$

$

$

$
$
$
$
$
$

 2,910,062
 422,916

14.5 %

2,996,628

3.1 %
1.5 %

476,876

 15.9 %

 340,647

 11.4 %

 134,826
 47,190
 4,932
 10,436
 (61,155)
 136,229

4.5 %
39
2,926

 2,820,740
 403,374

14.3 %

2,905,176

3.7 %
 (0.8)%

455,550

 15.7 %

 318,827

$
$

$

$

$

 11.0 %

$
 135,232
 51,450
$
 (5,403)(1) $
 10,970 (2) $
$
 (55,526)
$
 136,723

4.7 %
38
2,836

 2,721,132
 400,058

14.7 %

2,802,603

11.3 %
2.7 %

449,764

 16.0 %

 303,398

 10.8 %

 129,555
 48,856
 (1,846)
 28,789
 (58,988)
 146,366

5.2 %
37
2,671

(1) The decrease in operating income for the Colombia segment in fiscal year 2016 compared to fiscal year 2015 was primarily
a result of a 26.0% average decrease in the value of the Colombian peso versus the U.S. dollar during fiscal year 2016.
(2) The decrease in operating income for the United States Operations in fiscal year 2016 compared to fiscal year 2015 was 
primarily a result of the increase in operating expenses related to intercompany transactions with the Company’s Colombia 
subsidiary of approximately $10.9 million.  

(3) Certain revenues, operating costs and inter-company charges included in the United States segment are not allocated to the 
segments within this presentation, as it is impractical to do so, and they appear as reconciling items  to reflect the amount 
eliminated on consolidation of intersegment transactions.

f

12

  
Comparison of 2017 to 2016

Warehouse Club gross margin as a percent of net warehouse sales increased 23 basis points (0.23%) to 14.5% for the 
twelve  months  ended August  31,  2017  compared  to  the  same  twelve  month  period  a  year  ago  due  to  increased  margins  in 
Colombia, resulting from improving market conditions and business performance.  Warehouse Club gross margins in Colombia 
increased 273 basis points (2.73%).  Warehouse Club gross margins in Central America and the Caribbean were approximately 
equal to the same period a year ago.

Selling, general, and administrative expenses consist of warehouse club operations, general and administrative expenses, 
pre-opening expenses, and loss/(gain) on disposal of assets.  In total, selling, general and administrative expenses increased $21.8 
million to 11.4% of sales compared to 11.0% of sales in fiscal year 2016.  Warehouse club operations expense was 9.2% of sales 
compared 8.9% a year ago.  Low or negative comparable warehouse club sales growth, particularly in Trinidad and Costa Rica, 
contributed to an overall increase in warehouse expense as a percent of sales in Central America and the Caribbean.  Colombia
had a 50 basis point (0.50%) improvement in warehouse club operations expense as a percent of sales compared to fiscal year
2016.  General and administrative expenses grew 8.8% to 2.4% of sales compared to a year ago at 2.2% of sales resulting from 
increased staffing in our buying department, information technology costs and costs associated with the relocation of an executive 
to our San Diego headquarters. Expenses incurred before a warehouse club is in operation are captured in pre-opening expenses,
which in fiscal year 2016 included the preopening expenses for Chia, Colombia and Masaya, Nicaragua.

f

tt

Operating income of $136.2 million was $494,000 below last year.  Higher net warehouse sales and membership income 
and increased warehouse club gross margins resulted in a $10.3 million increase in operating profit in Colombia compared to a 
year ago.  Operating income decreased $406,000 in Central America and $4.3 million in the Caribbean on the low or negative 
sales growth experienced in those segments. 

Comparison of 2016 to 2015

For the twelve months ended August 31, 2016, total gross margin as a percent of sales was 40 basis points (0.40%) lower
than the twelve months ended August 31, 2015.  Total gross margin as a percent of total consolidated revenues decreased 41 basis
points (0.41%) in Colombia from the year ago period largely as a result of pricing actions we took during the year to provide 
value on imported goods to our members. Total gross margins as a percent of sales in the non-Colombia markets were in aggregate
1 basis points (0.01%) higher.  This was largely due to increased margins in Central America segment offset by higher level of 
markdowns, reduced endcap activity and higher per unit distribution costs.

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 15 basis points (0.15%) year-over-year when compared to total 
revenues.  The Company incurred the expenses associated with five new warehouse clubs for all or a portion of fiscal year 2016 
compared to fiscal year 2015.  The combination of lower first year sales and resulting higher expense ratio for new warehouse 
clubs compared to more mature clubs, and the cannibalization of sales from an existing nearby club without the proportionate 
decrease in expenses, resulted in an overall 7 basis point (0.07%) increase in warehouse operations expense as a percent of net
warehouse sales.  Additionally,  added staffing to support the Company’s growth, most notably in the buying and information
technology areas, and increased deferred compensation expense associated with stock awards granted in the first quarter, added 
$3.0 million of selling, general and administrative expense in fiscal year 2016 compared to fiscal year 2015.

During the first and second quarters of fiscal year 2016, pre-opening expenses were related to the warehouse club opened 
in Managua, Nicaragua during November 2015, and during the third and fourth quarters, pre-opening expenses incurred were 
related to the new warehouse club opened in Chia, Colombia on September 1, 2016. This resulted in flat spending for both pre-
opening and asset disposal costs, when compared to total revenue, year-over-year. 

Interest Expense

Years Ended

August 31,
2017

August 31,
2016

Increase/
(decrease)
from prior
year

 645
 (394)
 635
 886

$

$

Amount

 4,991
 1,982
 (1,082)
 5,891

Amount

$

$

 5,636
 1,588
 (447)
 6,777

$

$

Interest expense on loans
Interest expense related to hedging activity
Capitalized interest
Net interest expense

13

  
Interest expense on loans

Capitalized interest
Net interest expense

Years Ended

August 31,
2016

August 31,
2015

Increase/
(decrease)
from prior
year

$

 187
 (709)
 (27)
 (549) $

Amount

 4,804
 2,691
 (1,055)
 6,440

Amount

$

$

 4,991
 1,982
 (1,082)
 5,891

$

$

Interest expense reflects borrowings by PriceSmart, Inc. and our wholly owned foreign subsidiaries to finance new land
acquisition  and  construction  for  new  warehouse  clubs,  warehouse  club  expansions,  and  distribution  centers,  the  capital
requirements of warehouse club operations and ongoing working capital requirements.

Comparison of 2017 to 2016

Net interest expense for fiscal year 2017 increased from a year ago, with an increase in 

long-term debt, primarily to
finance the acquisition of the distribution center in Miami, Florida and an additional loan within our Trinidad subsidiary as part 
efforts to improve liquidity. Additionally, a decrease in interest capitalized year-over-year, due to lower levels of construction
activities, also accounted for the increased interest expense.  These increases  were partially offset by the decrease in interest
expense related to hedging activity due to the retirement of loans and their related cross-currency interest rate hedges for our 
Colombia subsidiary.    

r

Comparison of 2016 to 2015

Net interest expense for the twelve-months ended August 31, 2016 decreased from the prior fiscal year due to a decrease
in interest expense from hedging activity.  This was primarily related to the decrease in the volatility in interest rates for the 
interest rates related to the hedged loans.  This decrease was partially offset by an increase in interest expense related the 
net 
increase of new loans for approximately $11.6 million year-on year.  

n

Other Income (Expense), net

Other income consists of currency gain or loss and proceeds from insurance reimbursements.

Years Ended

August 31,
2017
Increase/ 
(decrease) 
from prior
year

Amount

August 31,
2016

%Change

Amount

Other income (expense), net

$

 1,482

$

 2,381

 (264.8) % $

 (899)

Years Ended

August 31,
2016
Increase/ 
(decrease) 
from prior
year

Amount

August 31,
2015

%Change

Amount

Other income (expense), net

$

 (899) $

 3,489

 (79.5) % $

 (4,388)

Monetary  assets  and  liabilities  denominated  in  currencies  other  than  the  functional  currency  of  the  respective  entity
(primarily U.S. dollars) are revalued to the functional currency using the exchange rate on the balance sheet date.  These foreign 
exchange transaction gain (losses), including repatriation of funds, are recorded as currency gain or losses.  

t
Receipts from insurance reimbursements up to the amount of the  losses recognized are considered recoveries. These
recoveries are accounted for when they are probable of receipt. Insurance recoveries are not recognized prior to the recognition

14

  
of the related cost. Anticipated proceeds in excess of the amount of loss recognized are considered gains and are subject to gain
contingency guidance. Anticipated proceeds in excess of a loss recognized in the financial statements are not recognized until all
contingencies related to the insurance claim are resolved.

Comparison of 2017 to 2016

For the twelve-month period, we had a net gain associated with foreign currency transactions of approximately $1.2
million compared to an approximate $899,000 net loss in fiscal year 2016. This net gain resulted from the revaluation of net U.S.
dollar  assets  in  certain  markets  where  the  local  functional  currency  devalued  against  the  U.S.  dollar,  and  from  exchange
transactions,  net  of  any  exchange  reserve  movements.    We  also  continue  to  incur  higher  transaction  costs  associated  with 
converting TT dollars into available tradeable currencies such as Euros or Canadian dollars before converting them to U.S. dollars,
which  partially  offset  the  gains  resulting  from  revaluations. While  that  situation  continues  in  Trinidad,  we  have  taken  that 
additional cost into consideration in our pricing model.  

During  the  fourth  quarter  of  fiscal  year  2017,  we  recorded income  for  approximately  $241,000  due  to  an  insurance 

recovery for losses recognized in fiscal year 2015.

Comparison of 2016 to 2015

We had a net loss associated with foreign currency transactions of approximately $899,000 for fiscal year 2016 compared 
to a net loss of approximately $4.4 million for fiscal year 2015. The improvement in fiscal year 2016 compared to 2015 is mostly 
related  to  Colombia  where  we  took  a  number  of  actions  to  mitigate  any  large  exposures  to  the  Colombian  peso,  including
increased  capitalization  of  the  Colombian  subsidiary,  which  allows  for  timely  payments  by  the  Colombia  subsidiary  for 
merchandise and fixed assets shipped by PriceSmart, Inc. to Colombia. We experienced increased volatility of currencies within
our other markets that largely offset each other.

r

Provision for Income Taxes 

Current tax expense
Net deferred tax provision (benefit)
Provision for income taxes
Effective tax rate

Current tax expense
Net deferred tax provision (benefit)
Provision for income taxes
Effective tax rate

Years Ended

August 31,
2017

August 31,
2016

Increase/
(decrease)
from
prior year

 4,891 $
 (5,722)

 (831) $

Amount
 44,865
   (2,847)
 42,018

  31.7 %

$

$

Amount
 39,974
 2,875
 42,849

 32.6 %

Years Ended

August 31,
2016

August 31,
2015

Increase/
(decrease)
from
prior year

$

$

 (4,620)
 (97)
 (4,717)

$

$

Amount
 44,594
 2,972
 47,566

Amount
 39,974
 2,875
 42,849

 32.6 %

 34.8 %

$

$

$

$

15

 
Comparison of 2017 to 2016

For  fiscal  year  2017,  the  effective  tax  rate  was  31.7%.  The  decrease  in  the  effective  rate  versus  the  prior  year  was

primarily attributable to the following factors:

1. The favorable impact of 1.3% due predominantly to the non-recurrence in fiscal year 2017 of the adverse impact in
the prior year  from setting up a valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets of the Company’s Barbados 
subsidiary;

2. A decrease in fiscal year 2017 in the magnitude of an intercompany transaction between PriceSmart, Inc. and our
Colombian subsidiary in support of PriceSmart’s ongoing market development and growth in Colombia compared 
to  fiscal  year  2016. Reduction  to  this  intercompany  transaction,  year  over  year,  resulted  in  a  comparatively
unfavorable impact on the effective tax rate of 0.9% due to less reductions to taxable income in the U.S. and less
reciprocal increase in taxable income in our Colombia subsidiary in fiscal year 2017 compared to fiscal year 2016. 
u
This income did not generate income tax expense in Colombia, because the additional taxable income in Colombia
was fully offset by the reversal of valuation allowances on accumulated net losses in that subsidiary. We expect the
decrease of the favorable impact to the consolidated Company’s effective tax rate over the next several quarters to 
continue; and

3. The comparably favorable impact of 1.4% resulting from improved financial results in the Company’s Colombia 

subsidiary for which no tax benefit was recognized, net of adjustment to valuation allowance.

Comparison of 2016 to 2015

For  fiscal  year  2016,  the  effective  tax  rate  was  32.6%.  The  decrease  in  the  effective  rate  versus  the  prior  year  was
primarily  attributable  to  an  intercompany  transaction  between  PriceSmart,  Inc.  and  our  Colombian  subsidiary  in  support  of 
PriceSmart’s ongoing market development and growth in Colombia.  This intercompany transaction resulted in a favorable impact
on the effective tax rate of 3% due to reductions to taxable income in the U.S. and a resulting increase in taxable income in our 
Colombia subsidiary. This income did not generate income tax expense in Colombia, because the additional taxable income in 
Colombia was fully offset by the reversal of valuation allowances on accumulated net losses in that subsidiary.  We expect a
similar  favorable  impact  to  the  consolidated  Company’s  effective  tax  rate  over  the  next  several  quarters.   Additionally,  in
comparison to the prior year, there was an offsetting unfavorable impact of 1.5% due to the establishment of a valuation allowance
against the deferred tax assets of the Company’s Barbados subsidiary. While the Company’s forecasts indicate profitability for 
the immediate and foreseeable future, the existence of negative objective evidence from recent years established the need for a
valuation allowance of approximately $2.0 million in order to reduce deferred tax assets to amounts expected to be realized.

u

Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Summary of Changes in Other Comprehensive Income (loss)
Years Ended

August 31,
2017
(Decrease)
from

August 31,
2016
(Decrease)
from

August 31,
2015

Foreign currency 
translation adjustments

$ (108,539) $

 (6,297)

 6.2 % $  (102,242) $

 (1,702)

 1.7 % $  (100,540)

Amount

prior year % Change

Amount

prior year % Change

Amount

plan
Derivative Instruments
Total

 (442)
 (1,078)
$ (110,059) $

 (127)
316
 (6,108)

 40.3 %
 (22.7)%

 (315)
 (1,394)

 5.9 % $  (103,951) $

 (202)
 (535)
 (2,439)

 178.8 %
 62.3 %

 (113)
 (859)
 2.4 % $  (101,512)

Comparison of 2017 to 2016

Other comprehensive income/(loss) for fiscal years 2017 and 2016 resulted primarily from foreign currency translation
adjustments  related  to  the  assets  and  liabilities  and  the  translation  of  the  statements of  income  related  to  revenue,  costs  and
expenses of our subsidiaries whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar. When the functional currency in our international 
subsidiaries is the local currency and not U.S. dollars, the assets and liabilities of such subsidiaries are translated to U.S. dollars 
at the exchange rate on the balance sheet date, and revenue, costs and expenses are translated at average rates of exchange in

16

 
effect  during  the  period.  The  corresponding  translation  gains  and  losses  are  recorded  as  a  component  of  accumulated  other
comprehensive  income  or  loss.  These  adjustments  will  not  affect  net  income  until  the  sale  or  liquidation  of  the  underlying
investment. The reported other comprehensive income or loss reflects the unrealized increase or de
crease in the value in U.S. 
dollars of the net assets of the subsidiaries as of the date of the balance sheet, which will vary from period to period as exchange
rates  fluctuate.  During  fiscal  year  2017,  the  largest  translation  adjustments  were  related  to  the  translation  of  the  Costa  Rica, 
Dominican Republic and Nicaragua subsidiaries’ balance sheets and statements of income that required us to record losses to 
comprehensive net income on translation of approximately $6.8 million. 

ff

t

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Financial Position and Cash Flow

We  require  cash  to  fund  our  operating  expenses  and  working  capital  requirements,  including  the  investment  in
merchandise  inventories,  acquisition  of  land  and  construction  of new  warehouse  clubs  and  distribution  centers,  expansion  of 
existing warehouse clubs and distribution centers, acquisitions of fixtures and equipment, routine upgrades and maintenance of 
fixtures and equipment within existing warehouse clubs, investments in joint ventures in Panama and  Costa Rica to own and 
operate commercial retail centers located adjacent to the new warehouse clubs, the purchase of treasury stock upon the vesting
of restricted stock awards and payment of dividends to stockholders.  Our primary sources for funding these requirements are 
cash and cash equivalents on hand, cash generated from operations and bank borrowings.  We evaluate on a regular basis whether 
we may need to borrow additional funds to cover any shortfall in our ability to generate sufficient cash from operations to mee
t 
our operating and capital requirements.  As such, we may enter into or obtain additional loans and/or credit facilities to provide
additional liquidity when necessary.  In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 
230)—Restricted Cash. This ASU addresses the diversity in practice that exists regarding the classification and the presentation 
of changes in restricted cash on the statement of cash flows. The amendments in ASU No. 2016-18 require that a statement of 
cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents and amounts generally described as restricted
cash or restricted cash equivalents. Thus, amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should
be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and the end-of-period total amounts set 
forth on the statement of cash flows.  The Company early adopted this ASU, and has accordingly updated its liquidity analysis 
to reflect the change. 

d

t

The following table summarizes the cash and cash equivalents held by our foreign subsidiaries and domestically (in 
thousands).  Repatriation of cash and cash equivalents held by foreign subsidiaries may require us to accrue and pay taxes.  We
have no plans at this time to repatriate cash through the payment of cash dividends by our foreign subsidiaries to our domestic
operations and, therefore, have not accrued taxes that would be due from repatriation.

Cash and cash equivalents held by foreign subsidiaries
Cash and cash equivalents held domestically
Total cash and cash equivalents

August 31,
2017
 139,270
 26,442
 165,712

$

$

August 31,
2016
 163,247
 39,469
 202,716

$

$

From time to time we have experienced a lack of availability of U.S. dollars in certain markets (U.S. dollar illiquidity).  
This impedes our ability to convert local currencies obtained through warehouse sales into U.S. dollars to settle the U.S. dollar 
liabilities  associated  with  our  imported  products,  increasing  our  foreign  exchange  exposure  to  any  devaluation  of  the  local 
currency relative to the U.S. dollar.  During fiscal year 2017 and continuing into fiscal year 2018, we experienced this situation
in Trinidad (“TT”).  We have been and continue to work with our banks in Trinidad to source tradable currencies (including Euros
and Canadian dollars), but until the central bank in Trinidad makes more U.S. dollars available, this illiquidity condition is likely
to continue. During part of the first half of fiscal year 2017, we limited shipments of merchandise to Trinidad from our distribution 
center  in  Miami  to  levels  that  generally  aligned  with  our  Trinidad  subsidiary’s  ability  to  source  U.S.  dollars  to  pay  for  that
merchandise. This resulted in a reduced level of shipments, which negatively affected sales in the second quarter, particularly 
December, although by less than our initial estimate. These actions did not impact the level of merchandise we obtain locally in 
Trinidad.  Starting in the third quarter of fiscal year 2017, we were able to improve our sourcing of tradeable currencies, which,
in addition to other steps we took, allowed for a more normalized flow of imported merchandise during the third and fourth fiscal
quarters.  As of August 31, 2017, our Trinidad subsidiary had net U.S. dollar denominated assets of approximately $4.0 million.
However, the illiquidity situation remains in the Trinidad market, and we could face similar issues in sourcing U.S. dollars during
the first and second quarters of fiscal year 2018, which may require us to limit shipments from the U.S. to Trinidad in line with
our ability to exchange Trinidad dollars for tradeable currencies to manage our exposure to any potential devaluation. 

17

  
Our cash flows are summarized as follows (in thousands):

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
Effect of exchange rates
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

$

August 31,
2017
 122,856
 (135,217)
 (21,805)
 (2,838)
 (37,004) $

$

$

Years Ended
August 31,
2016
 141,531
 (78,175)
 (16,460)
 (2,777)
 44,119

August 31,
2015
 109,582
 (89,082)
 (16,955)
 (11,412)
 (7,867)

$

$

Our operating activities provided cash for all periods presented as summarized below:

Net income
Adjustments to reconcile net 
income to net cash provided from 
(used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization
(Gain) loss on sale of property and 
equipment
Deferred income taxes
Stock-based compensation 
expenses
Other non-cash operating
activities
Proceeds from settlement of 
derivatives
Net non-cash related expenses
Net income from operating 
activities reconciled for non-cash 
operating activities
Changes in operating assets and 
liabilities not including
merchandise inventories
Changes in merchandise
inventories
Net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities

August 31,
2017

Years Ended
August 31,
2016

August 31,
2015

Increase/
(Decrease)

2017 to 2016

2016 to 2015

$

 90,724

$

 88,723

$

 89,124

$

 2,001 $

 (401)

 46,292

 39,794

 34,445

 1,961
 (2,845)

 9,524

 1,162
 2,875

 8,511

 2,005
 2,972

 4,763

 1

 (325)

 (94)

 6,498

 799
 (5,720)

 1,013

 326

 5,349

 (843)
 (97)

 3,748

 (231)

 —
 54,933

$

 —
 52,017

$

 8,543
 52,634

$

$

 —
 2,916 $

 (8,543)
 (617)

 145,657

 140,740

 141,758

 4,917

 (1,018)

 5,238

 16,523

 8,616

 (11,285)

 7,907

 (28,039)

 (15,732)

 (40,792)

 (12,307)

 25,060

$

 122,856

$

 141,531

$

 109,582

$

 (18,675) $

 31,949

Net income from operating activities reconciled for non-cash operating activities increased approximately $4.9 million
for the twelve-months ended August 31, 2017 over the same period last year.  This was primarily a result of a year-over-year
increases in net income of approximately $2.0 million and a year-over-year increase in non-cash adjustments of approximately
$2.9 million.  The increase in non-cash adjustment was primarily the result of the increase in depreciation and amortization due
to  the  opening  in  fiscal  year  2017  of  a  new  warehouse  club  in  Colombia,  a  new  distribution  center  in  Miami  and  continued 
n
expansion of existing facilities combined with the normal ongoing additions to fixtures and equipment.  Additionally the non-
cash related expenses also increased due to stock-based compensation expenses for approximately $1.0 million associated with 
stock awards granted in the first quarter.  These were offset by year-on-year decreases in non-cash adjustments related to the
increase in deferred income taxes for approximately $5.7 million.  The increase in deferred tax assets was primarily the result of 
the non-recurrence of a valuation allowance established against the net deferred tax assets of the Company’s Barbados subsidiary
in fiscal year 2016; an increase in foreign tax credit generation related to our offshore warehouse club operations; and a decrease
in U.S. foreign tax credit utilization related to tax deduction timing.

t

Net income from operating activities reconciled for non-cash operating activities decreased approximately $1.0 million
for the twelve-months ended August 31, 2016 over the same period last year.  This was primarily a result of a year-over-year
decrease  in  net  income  of  approximately  $400,000  and  a  year-on-year  decrease  in  non-cash  adjustments  of  approximately
$617,000.  The decrease in non-cash adjustment was primarily the result of proceeds from settlements of derivatives recorded in
fiscal year 2015 for approximately $8.5 million, with no proceeds being recorded during fiscal year 2016.  This decrease to net

18

non-cash related expenses was partially offset by increases in depreciation expenses for approximately $5.3 million and increases 
in stock-based compensation expenses for approximately $3.7 million associated with stock awards granted in the first quarter of 
fiscal  year  2016.   The  increase  in  depreciation  is  due  to  new  warehouse  club  investments  and  the  continued  ongoing  capital 
improvements to existing warehouse clubs.

Our use of cash in investing activities for the period presented is summarized below:

Land acquisitions
Deposits for land purchase option 
agreements
Warehouse club expansion,
construction, and land 
improvements
Acquisition of fixtures and 
equipment
Proceeds from disposals of 
property and equipment
Capital contribution to joint 
ventures
Net cash flows used by (provided 
in) investing activities

August 31,
2017

Years Ended
August 31,
2016

August 31,
2015

$

 30,199

$

 3,161

$

 16,780

Increase/
(Decrease)

2017 to 2016
 27,038

$

2016 to 2015

$

 (13,619)

 300

 442

 (1,095)

 (142)

 1,537

 57,685

 47,410

 (377)

 —

 33,064

 41,475

 (86)

 119

 45,414

 26,991

 (368)

 1,360

 24,621

 (12,350)

 5,935

 14,484

 (291)

 (119)

 282

 (1,241)

$

 135,217

$

 78,175

$

 89,082

$

 57,042

$

 (10,907)

Net cash used in investing activities increased in fiscal year 2017 compared to fiscal year 2016 by approximately $57.0 
million.  This was primarily due to an increase in cash expenditures related to the acquisition of a distribution center in Medley, 
Miami-Dade County, Florida in January 2017, construction activities for a warehouse club in Santa Ana, Costa Rica that opened 
in  October 2017, construction activities for a warehouse club in the Santa Domingo, Dominican Republic that we plan to open 
in the spring of 2018 and construction activities for a warehouse club in Chia, Colombia that opened in September 2016.  The
Company also used cash for the acquisition of land in Costa Rica and the Dominican Republic. An
n
increase in overall warehouse 
a
club expansion activities, related to warehouse expansions in Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador during fiscal year 2017 also 
increased year-over-year investing activities.

Net cash used in investing activities decreased in fiscal year 2016 compared to fiscal year 2015 by approximately $10.9
million primarily due to decreases in cash expended for the purchase of land, the decrease in expenditures for warehouse club
expansion,  and  a  lower  level  of  construction  and  land  improvement  activities  during  fiscal  year  2016. These  decreases  were 
partially offset by period-over-period increases in the acquisition of fixtures and equipment and deposits for land purchase option 
agreements. During fiscal year 2016, expenditures for warehouse
 club expansions and for fixtures and equipment were associated 
with the construction of the completed warehouse club in Managua, Nicaragua that opened in November 2015 and construction
activities of a warehouse club in Chia, Colombia, during fiscal year 2016. Net cash used in investing activities in fiscal year 2015 
consisted of cash expended for the construction and completion of warehouse clubs in Bogota, Colombia ("Salitre"), Pereira,
Colombia,  and  Medellin,  Colombia  and  the  additions  of  fixtures  and  equipment  for  these  warehouse  clubs. Additionally,  we 
constructed a warehouse club in Panama during the first nine months of fiscal year 2015.  Acquisition of fixtures and equipment
increased  year-over-year  by  approximately  $14.4  million.  This  was  primarily  due  to  the  continued  normal  ongoing  capital 
expenditures for the upgrade and replacement of equipment and building and leasehold improvements.

r

r

As  of  August  31,  2017,  we  had  commitments  for  capital  expenditures  for  new  warehouse  club  construction  for
approximately $7.9 million related to our building of warehouse clubs in Santa Ana, Costa Rica and Santo Domingo, Dominican 
Republic.  We expect to spend between $120.0 million and $140.0 million in capital expenditures for ongoing replacement of 
ng warehouse clubs and land acquisitions during fiscal
equipment, building/leasehold improvements, expansion projects on existi
year  2018.    Future  capital  expenditures  will  be  dependent  on  the  timing  of  future  land  purchases  and/or  warehouse  club
construction activity.

x

We  have  entered  into  land  purchase  option  agreements  within  our  subsidiaries  that  have  not  been  recorded  as  a 
commitments,  for  which  we  have  recorded  deposits  of  approximately  $600,000.    The  land  purchase  option  agreements  can 
generally be canceled at our sole option with the deposits being fully refundable up and until all permits are issued.  We also
entered into a land lease option in one of our markets, for which no deposits have been made. We do not have a timetable of when 
or if we  will exercise these land purchase/lease options, due to the uncertainty related to the completion of our due diligence
reviews.  Our due diligence reviews include evaluations of the legal status of the property, the zoning and permitting issues related 
to acquiring approval for the construction and operation of a warehouse club and any other issues related to the property itself 

19

that  could  render  the  property  unsuitable  or  limit  the  property's  economic  viability  as
  a  warehouse  club  site.    If  all  of  these
r
purchase option agreements are exercised, the cash use for the acquisition of land would be  approximately $20.8 million.  We 
may enter into additional land purchase option agreements in the future. 

 In January 2017, the Company finalized its acquisition of a distribution center in Medley, Miami-Dade County, Florida, 
for a total purchase price of approximately $46.0 million and the Company transferred its Miami dry distribution center activities 
previously located in its leased facilities to this location.  This was completed during the third quarter of fiscal year 2017. The 
Company  has  terminated  and  intends  to  continue  to  terminate  leases  with  respect  to  portions  of  the  existing  leased  Miami 
distribution facilities or enter into sublease agreements for portions of the leased facilities.  

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities for the period presented is summarized below:

August 31,
2017

Years Ended
August 31,
2016

August 31,
2015

Increase/
(Decrease)

2017 to 2016

2016 to 2015

New bank loans offset by 
regularly scheduled payments on 
existing bank loans (loan 
activities)
New short-term bank loans, offset 
by payments
Repayment of long-term debt with
cross-currency and/or  interest rate
swaps
Cash dividend payments
Proceeds from exercise of stock 
options and the tax benefit related 
to stock-based compensation
Purchase of treasury stock related
to vesting of restricted stock
Net cash (used in)/provided by
financing activities

$

 31,638

$

 (2,155) $

 22,072 (1) $

 33,793 $

 (24,227)

 (16,501)

 9,613

 9,521

 (26,114)

 92

 (13,333)(2)
 (21,285)

 —
 (21,274)

 (24,000)(2)
 (21,126)

 (13,333)
 (11)

 24,000
 (148)

 869

 690

 1,255

 (3,193)

 (3,334)

 (4,677)

 179

 141

 (565)

 1,343

$

 (21,805)

$

 (16,460) $

 (16,955)

$

 (5,345) $

 495

(1) New bank loans offset by establishment of certificates of deposit held against loans and regularly scheduled payments 

on existing bank loans.

(2) Early pay down of long-term loans.

Net cash from long-term and short-term loan activities decreased approximately $5.7 million in fiscal year 2017 when 
compared to fiscal year  2016, with an overall increase in cash due to long-term and short-term loan activities for the year of 
approximately $1.8 million.  This increase in cash from long-term and short-term loan activities was primarily comprised of the
addition of a new loan for approximately $35.7 million related to the acquisition of the Miami distribution center and a new loan
within our Trinidad subsidiary for approximately $12.0 million.  These additional loan amounts were offset by regularly scheduled
long-term loan payments of $16.1 million, additional net payments of approximately $16.5 million on short-term loans and the
early pay down of a loan within our Panama subsidiary for approximately $13.3 million.  

Net cash provided by long-term and short-term loan activities decreased approximately $27.1 million in fiscal year 2016 
over fiscal year 2015.  We received cash during fiscal year 2016 from short-term borrowings for approximately $28.9 million and
cash from additional long-term loans entered into by our subsidies of approximately $14.4 million.  This increase in cash was 
offset by repayments of long-term loans of approximately $2.8 million and regularly scheduled loan payments of $13.7 million.  
Additional  payments  for  approximately  $19.3  million  on  the  short-term  loans  were  recorded. This  activity  accounted  for  an
overall increase in cash provided by long-term and short-term loan activities of approximately $7.5 million.  

r

20

Contractual Obligations

Contractual obligations
Long-term debt and interest(1)
Operating leases(2)
Additional capital contribution commitments 
to joint ventures(3)
Data recovery services(4)
Distribution center services(5)
Medley, Miami Dry Distribution Center Exit 
Obligation(6)
Warehouse club construction commitments (7)
Total

$

$

Less than
1 Year

1 to 3
Years

Payments due in:
4 to 5
Years

After
5 Years

18,358
11,596

$

34,406
22,807

$

20,907
18,509

$

32,626
116,066

$

884
372
152

—
466
304

—
—
—

—
—
—

Total
106,297
168,978

884
838
456

57
7,891
39,310

$

—
—
57,983

$

—
—
39,416

$

—
—
148,692

$

57
7,891
285,401

(1) Long-term debt includes debt with both fixed and variable interest rates. We have used rates as of August 31, 2017 to

calculate future estimated payments related to the variable rate items.  For the portion of the loans subject to interest rate
swaps and cross-currency interest rate swaps, we have used the fixed interest rate as set by the interest rate swaps.

(2) Operating lease obligations have been reduced by approximately $928,000 to reflect the amounts net of sublease income.  
Operating lease obligations include $4.9 million of lease payment obligations for the prior leased Miami distribution center.  
For the purposes of calculating the minimum lease payments, no reduction was considered for the potential sub-lease income 
the Company could receive during the remaining lease term.  This potential sub-lease income was considered, however, for 
the purposes of calculating the exit obligation of $57,000 recorded on the balance sheet as of August 31, 2017.  Projected
income from any executed sub-leases would be used to reduce the amount reported as minimum lease payments.

(3) Amounts shown are the contractual capital contribution requirements for our investment in the joint ventures that we have 
agreed to make; however, the parties intend to seek alternate financing for these projects.  The parties may mutually agree
on changes to the project, which could increase or decrease the amount of contributions each party is required to provide.

uu

(4) Amounts shown are the minimum payments under our off-site data recovery services agreement. 
(5) Amounts shown are the minimum payments under distribution center service agreements for Mexico City.
(6)

r

In  January  2017,  the  Company  purchased  a  distribution  center  in  Medley,  Miami-Dade  County,  Florida.  The  Company 
transferred its Miami dry distribution center activities that were previously in a leased facility to the new facility, during the 
third quarter of fiscal year 2017. As part of this transaction, the Company has recorded an exit obligation related to the lease
of the previous distribution center.  Some portions of the vacated previously leased space were subleased (and subsequently 
returned to the  landlord) while the remainder remains available for sublease.  As part of the subleases the Company  has 
agreed to execute and deliver to the landlord of the leased facility a letter of credit (“LOC”) in the amount of $500,000 which
entitles the landlord to draw on the LOC based on a decreasing scale over four years, if certain conditions occur related to 
nonpayment by the new tenant.  Although this agreement is considered a guarantee, in measuring the fair value, the Company 
considers the risk and probability of default by the third party tenant as not likely nor probable, based on the Company’s 
review of the third party tenant’s financial position as well as the third party’s considerable capital investment into the leased 
facility.  Therefore, the Company has not recorded a liability for this guarantee, nor included a related commitment in the 
above chart.

(7) The amounts shown represent contractual obligations for construction services not yet rendered.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The  Company  does  not  have  any  off-balance  sheet  arrangements  that  have  had,  or  are  reasonably  likely  to  have,  a 

material current or future effect on its financial condition or consolidated financial statements.

Repurchase of Equity Securities and Reissuance of Treasury Shares

At the vesting dates for restricted stock awards to our employees, we repurchase a portion of the shares that have vested 
at  the  prior  day's  closing  price  per  share,  with  the  funds  used  to  pay  the  employees'  minimum  statutory  tax  withholding 
requirements related to the vesting of restricted stock awards.  We do not have a stock repurchase program.

Shares  of  common  stock  repurchased  by  us  are  recorded  at  cost  as  treasury  stock  and  result  in  the  reduction  of 
stockholders’ equity in our consolidated balance sheets.  We may reissue these treasury shares.  When treasury shares are reissued,
we use the first in/first out (“FIFO”) cost method for determining cost of the reissued shares.  If the issuance price is higher than
the cost, the excess of the issuance price over the cost is credited to additional paid-in capital (“APIC”).  If the issuance price is 
lower than the cost, the difference is  first charged against any credit balance in APIC  from treasury stock and the balance is 
charged to retained earnings.

21

The following table summarizes the shares repurchased during fiscal years 2017, 2016 and 2015:

Shares repurchased

August 31,
2017

Years Ended
August 31,
2016

August 31,
2015

 38,634
 3,193

$

 43,171
 3,334

$

 52,396
 4,677

$

We have reissued treasury shares as part of our stock-based compensation programs.

t

 However, as summarized below,

we did not reissue any treasury shares during the fiscal years 2017, 2016 and 2015. 

Dividends

The following table summarizes the dividends declared and paid during fiscal years 2017, 2016 and 2015.

Declared
2/3/2017
2/3/2016
2/4/2015

First Payment

Record
Date

Date
Paid

Second Payment
Date
Paid

Record
Date

Amount

Amount
   $  0.70     2/15/2017    2/28/2017   $  0.35     8/15/2017    8/31/2017   $  0.35
   $  0.70     2/15/2016    2/29/2016 $  0.35     8/15/2016    8/31/2016 $  0.35
$  0.70     2/13/2015    2/27/2015 $  0.35     8/14/2015    8/31/2015 $  0.35

Amount

We anticipate the ongoing payment of semi-annual dividends in subsequent periods, although the actual declaration of 
a
future  dividends,  the  amount  of  such  dividends,  and  the  establishment  of  record  and  payment  dates  is  subject  to  final
determination by the Board of Directors at its discretion after its review of the Company’s financial performance and anticipated 
capital requirements.

n

Financing Activities

Financing Activities

In August 2017, the Company’s Panama subsidiary paid off outstanding loan principal balance of U.S. $13.3 million 
under  loan  agreement  entered  into  with Scotiabank. The  Company’s  subsidiary  also  settled  the  interest  rate  swap  that  it  had
entered into with Scotiabank related to this loan.

On March 31, 2017, the Company's Trinidad subsidiary entered into a loan agreement with Citibank, N.A. The agreement 
provides for a US $12.0 million loan to be repaid in eight quarterly principal payments plus interest.  The interest rate is set at 
the 90 day LIBOR rate plus 3%.  The loan was funded on March 31, 2017.

On  January  27,  2017  the  Company  entered  into  a  10-year  real  estate  secured  loan  with  MUFG  Union  Bank,  N.A. 
(“Union Bank”). The loan establishes a credit facility of up to 75% LTV of the acquired property at a variable interest rate of 30-
day LIBOR plus 1.7% for a ten-year term, with monthly principal and interest payments, maturing in 2027. The monthly principal 
and  interest  payments  begin  in April  2019.   An  initial  loan  amount  of  $35.7  million  was  funded  on  January  27,  2017.   The 
Company entered into an interest rate hedge on November 7, 2016 with Union Bank for $35.7 million, the notional amount.  The
Company will receive variable 30-day LIBOR plus 1.7% and pay fixed (3.65%), with an effective date of March 1, 2017 and
maturity date of March 1, 2027.

f

On May 31, 2016, the Company's Trinidad subsidiary entered into a loan agreement with First Caribbean International 
Bank (“FCIB”).  The agreement supplements the outstanding loan facility agreement between the same parties.  The amount 
outstanding under the original loan was approximately $2.8 million as of May 31, 2016.  The agreement provides for a U.S. $7.0
million  loan  to  be  repaid  in  60  monthly  principal  payments plus  interest,  and  balloon  payment  of  $2.0  million  due  on  the
repayment date.  The interest rate is set at the 90 day LIBOR rate plus 2.75%.  The $7.0 million loan was funded and the pre-
existing $2.8 million dollar loan was paid in full on June 8, 2016.   

On September 18, 2015, the Company's Costa Rica subsidiary entered into a loan agreement with Banco BAC San Jose 
S.A. The agreement establishes a credit facility for 3.955 billion Costa Rican Colones ("CRC") (approximately U.S. $7.4 million) 
with a fixed interest rate of 7.5% for the first two years, and a rate of 3.0% over the rate of interest used by individual commercial 
banks as a basis for their lending rates as published by the Central Bank of Costa Rica for the remainder of the term.  The loan
term is for seven years with a twelve-month grace period on principal repayment.  Monthly interest is due beginning with the 
first  month  and  monthly  principal  payments  are  due  after  the twelve-month  grace  period  ends.    The  loan  was  funded  on
September 30, 2015.

22

 
 
Derivatives

We are exposed to certain risks relating to our ongoing business operations.  One risk managed by us using derivative 
instruments is interest rate risk.  To manage interest rate exposure, we enter into hedging transactions (interest rate swaps) using
derivative financial instruments.  The objective of entering into interest rate swaps is to eliminate the variability of cash flows in
the interest payments associated with variable-rate LIBOR loans over the life of the loans.  As changes in interest rates impac
t 
the future cash flow of interest payments, the hedges provide a synthetic offset to interest rate movements.

ff

r

In addition, we are exposed to foreign currency and interest rate cash flow exposure related to non-functional currency
long-term debt of two of our wholly owned subsidiaries.  To manage foreign currency and interest rate cash flow exposure, these
subsidiaries enter into cross-currency interest rate swaps that convert their U.S. dollar denominated floating interest payments to
functional currency fixed interest payments during the life of the hedging instrument.  As changes in foreign exchange and interest
rates impact the future cash flow of interest payments, the hedges are intended to offset changes in cash flows attributable to
interest rate and foreign exchange movements.

We are also exposed to foreign-currency exchange-rate fluctuations on U.S. dollar denominated liabilities within our 
international subsidiaries whose functional currency is other than the U.S. dollar.  We manage these fluctuations, in part, through 
the use of non-deliverable forward foreign-exchange contracts that are intended to offset changes in cash flow attributable to 
currency  exchange  movements.    The  contracts  are  intended primarily  to  economically  address  exposure  to  U.S.  dollar 
merchandise  inventory  expenditures  made  by  our  international  subsidiaries  whose  functional  currency  is  other  than  the  U.S.
dollar.  We seek to mitigate foreign-currency exchange-rate risk with the use of these contracts and do not intend to engage in
speculative transactions.  Currently, these contracts do not contain any credit-risk-related contingent features.  These contracts do 
not qualify for derivative hedge accounting.  The forward currency hedges are not effective cash flow hedges because the notional
amount and maturity date of the forward contract does not coincide with the accounts payable balance and due dates.  The hedge
ineffectiveness is measured by use of the “hypothetical derivative method,” and we record the changes in the fair value of the
forward contract related to the re-measurement of the payable at spot exchange rates as exchange rate gains or losses.  The implied
interest rate included within the forward contract is reflected in earnings as interest expense.

u

t

For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the gain or loss
on the derivative is reported as a component of other comprehensive income (loss) and reclassified into earnings in the same
period or periods during which the hedged transaction is determined to be ineffective.  There were no such amounts for the periods
reported herein.

23

  
The following table summarizes agreements for which we recorded cash flow hedge accounting transactions during the

twelve months ended August 31, 2017:

Subsidiary
PriceSmart, Inc 

Date 
Entered 
into
7-Nov-16

Costa Rica 

28-Aug-15

Derivative
Financial 
Counter-
party 
MUFG Union 
Bank, N.A. 
("Union 
Bank")
Citibank, N.A.
("Citi")

Honduras 

24-Mar-15  Citibank, N.A.

El Salvador 

16-Dec-14

Colombia 

10-Dec-14

Panama

9-Dec-14

Honduras 

23-Oct-14 

("Citi")

Bank of Nova 
Scotia 
("Scotiabank") 
Citibank, N.A.
("Citi")

Bank of Nova 
Scotia 
("Scotiabank") 
Citibank, N.A.
("Citi")

Derivative
Financial 
Instruments 

Interest rate
swap

Cross currency 
interest rate 
swap

Cross currency 
interest rate 
swap

Interest rate
swap

Cross currency 
interest rate 
swap

Interest rate
swap

Cross currency 
interest rate 
swap

Panama

Panama

Panama

1-Aug-14

Bank of Nova 
Scotia 
("Scotiabank") 
22-May-14  Bank of Nova 

Scotia 
("Scotiabank") 
22-May-14  Bank of Nova 

Scotia 
("Scotiabank") 

Interest rate
swap

Interest rate
swap

Interest rate
swap

Initial
US$
Notional 
Amount

Bank 
US$
loan 
Held 
with 

 35,700,000  Union 

Bank

 7,500,000 Citibank, 

N.A.

 8,500,000 Citibank, 

N.A.

 4,000,000 Bank of 

Nova 
Scotia

 15,000,000  Citibank, 

N.A.

 10,000,000  Bank of 

Nova 
Scotia

 5,000,000 Citibank, 

N.A.

 5,000,000 Bank of 

Nova 
Scotia

 19,800,000  Bank of 

Nova 
Scotia

 3,970,000 Bank of 

Nova 
Scotia

Floating Leg 
(swap
counter-
party)
Variable rate
1-month Libor 
plus 1.7%

Variable rate
3-month Libor 
plus 2.50%

Variable rate
3-month Libor 
plus 3.25%

Variable rate
30-day Libor 
plus 3.5%
Variable rate
3-month Libor 
plus 2.8%

Variable rate
30-day Libor 
plus 3.5%
Variable rate
3-month Libor 
plus 3.5%

Variable rate
30-day Libor 
plus 3.5%
Variable rate
30-day Libor 
plus 3.5%
Variable rate
30-day Libor 
plus 3.5%

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

Fixed Rate
for PSMT 
Subsidiary 

Settlement
Dates 

 3.65  % 1st day of each month 
beginning on April 1,
2017 

 7.65  % 28th day of August, 
November, February,
and May beginning on 
November 30, 2015 
 10.75 % 24th day of March, 

June, September, and 
December beginning
on June 24, 2015

 4.78  % 29th day of each month 
beginning  on 
December 29, 2014

 8.25  % 4th day of March,

June, Sept, Dec.
beginning on March 4,
2015 

 5.16  % 28th day of each month 

beginning 
December 29, 2014

 11.6  % 22nd day of January,

April, July, and 
October beginning on 
January 22, 2015 

Effective
Period of swap

March 1, 2017 -
March 1, 2027

August 28, 2015 -
August 28, 2020

March 24,2015 - 
March 20, 2020

December 1, 2014 -
August 29, 2019

December 4, 2014 -
December 3, 2019

November 28, 2014 
-
November 29, 2019
October 22, 2014 -
October 22, 2017

 4.89  % 21st day of each month 
beginning on 
September 22, 2014 

 4.98  % 4th day of each month 

beginning on June 4,
2014 

 4.98  % 4th day of each month 

beginning on June 4,
2014 

August 21, 2014 -
August 21, 2019

Settled on 
August 31, 2017

May 5, 2014 - 
April 4, 2019 

We  measure  the  fair  value  for  all  financial  assets  and  liabilities  that  are  recognized  or  disclosed  at  fair  value  in  the
financial  statements  on  a  recurring  basis  during  the  reporting period.   We  have  designated  the  interest  rate  swaps  and  cross-
currency  interest  rate  swap  agreements  as  hedging  instruments and  have  accounted  for  them  under  hedge  accounting  rules. 
Derivatives listed on the table below were designated as cash flow hedging instruments.  The table summarizes the effect of the
fair  value  of  interest  rate  swap  and  cross-currency  interest  rate  swap  derivative  instruments  that  qualify  for  derivative  hedge
accounting and its associated tax effect on accumulated other comprehensive (income) / loss (in thousands, except footnote data):

Derivatives designated as cash flow 
hedging instruments

Cross-currency interest rate swaps

Interest rate swaps

Cross-currency interest rate swaps
Net fair value of derivatives 
designated as hedging instruments

Balance Sheet
Location
Other non-current 
assets
Other long-term 
liabilities
Other long-term 
liabilities

August 31, 2017
Net Tax
Effect

Fair
Value

Net
OCI

August 31, 2016
Net Tax
Effect

Fair
Value

Net
OCI

$  2,547

 (950)

 1,597 $  3,224

 (1,248)

 1,976

 (231)

 80

 (151)

 (448)

 (451)

 135

 (316)

 (1,066)

 115

 320

 (333)

 (746)

$  1,865 $

 (735) $  1,130 $  1,710 $

 (813) $

 897

From time to time, we enter into non-deliverable forward exchange contracts.  These contracts are treated for accounting
purposes as fair value contracts and do not qualify for derivative hedge accounting.  As of August 31, 2017 the Company did not
have any open non-deliverable forward foreign-exchange contracts. 

24

The following table summarizes the fair value of foreign currency forward contracts that do not qualify for derivative

hedge accounting (in thousands):

Derivatives designated as fair value hedging 
instruments

Foreign currency forward contracts

Foreign currency forward contracts
Net fair value of derivatives designated as hedging 
instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting

Short-Term Borrowings and Long-Term Debt

August 31, 2017

August 31, 2016

Balance Sheet
Location
Other current 
assets
Other accrued 
expenses

Balance Sheet
Location
Other current 
assets
Other accrued 
expenses

Fair Value

$

 —

 —

 —

Fair Value

$

 34

 (144)

$

 (110)

Short-term borrowings consist of lines of credit which are secured by certain assets of the Company and its subsidiaries,
which, in some cases, are guaranteed by the Company. The following table summarizes the balances of total facilities, facilities
used and facilities available (in thousands):

Total Amount
of Facilities

Short-term
Borrowings

Letters of
Credit

Facilities
Available

Weighted average
interest rate

August 31, 2017
August 31, 2016

$
$

 69,000
 65,000

$
$

 — $
$

 16,534

 966
 9,224

$
$

 68,034
 39,242

 — %
 10.1 %

Facilities Used

As of August 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had approximately $40.0 million of short-term facilities in the U.S. that 
require compliance with certain quarterly financial covenants.  As of August 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company was in compliance
with respect to these covenants.  Each of the facilities expires annually and is normally renewed.

The following table provides the changes in our long-term debt for the twelve months ended August 31, 2017:

(Amounts in thousands)
Balances as of August 31, 2016

 incurred during the period:

MUFG Union Bank
Trinidad subsidiary
Repayments of long-term debt:
Repayment of loan by Panama subsidiary
Regularly scheduled loan payments
Translation adjustments on foreign-currency debt of subsidiaries
whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar (2)
Balances as of August 31, 2017

Current
portion of
long-
term debt

Long-term
debt (net of 
current
portion)

Total

$

 14,565

$

 73,542

$

 88,107 (1)

 —
 6,000

 (2,000)
 (225)

 35,700
 6,000

 (11,333)
 (15,837)

 35,700
 12,000

 (13,333)
 (16,062)

 18
 18,358

$

$

 (133)
 87,939

$

 (115)
 106,297 (3)

(1) The carrying amount on non-cash assets assigned as collateral for this total was $102.4 million.  No cash assets were assigned 

as collateral for this total. 

(2) These foreign currency translation adjustments are recorded within Other comprehensive income.
(3) The carrying amount on non-cash assets assigned as collateral for this total was $128.4 million.  No cash assets were assigned 

as collateral for this total.

As  of August 31,  2017,  the  Company  had  approximately  $85.6  million  of  long-term  loans  in  Trinidad,  Panama,  El 
Salvador, Honduras, Costa Rica, Barbados and Colombia that require these subsidiaries to comply with certain annual or quarterly
financial covenants, which include debt service and leverage ratios.  As of August 31, 2017, the Company was in compliance 
with all covenants or amended covenants.

As  of August 31,  2016,  the  Company  had  approximately  $76.0  million  of  long-term  loans  in  Trinidad,  Panama,  El 
Salvador, Honduras, Costa Rica, Barbados and Colombia that require these subsidiaries to comply with certain annual or quarterly

25

  
financial covenants, which include debt service and leverage ratios.  As of August 31, 2016, the Company was in compliance
with all covenants or amended covenants.

Critical Accounting Estimates

The preparation of our consolidated financial statements requires that management make estimates and judgments that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements  and  the  reported  amounts  of  revenue  and  expenses during  the  reporting  period.   Some  of  our  accounting  policies
require management to make difficult and subjective judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates of matters  that 
are inherently  uncertain.  Management continues to review its accounting policies and evaluate its estimates, including those
related to contingencies and litigation, income taxes, value added taxes, and long-lived assets.  We base our estimates on historical 
experience and on other assumptions that management believes to be reasonable under the present circumstances.  Using different
uu
estimates could have a material impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

Income Taxes:  We account for income taxes using the asset and liability method.  Under the asset and liability method,
deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial
statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases.  Deferred tax assets and liabilities are 
measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences and carry-
forwards are expected to be recovered or settled.  The effect on deferred tax assets and  liabilities of a change in tax rates is
recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.  A valuation allowance is established when necessary to
reduce deferred tax assets to amounts expected to be realized.  As of August 31, 2017, we evaluated our deferred tax assets and
liabilities  and  determined  that  a  valuation  allowance  was  necessary  for  certain  foreign  deferred  tax  asset  balances,  primarily
because of the existence of significant negative objective evidence, such as the fact that certain subsidiaries are in a cumulative
loss position for the past three years, indicating that certain net operating loss carry-forward periods are not sufficient to realize
the related deferred tax assets.

We and our subsidiaries are required to file federal and state income tax returns in the United States and various other
tax  returns  in  foreign  jurisdictions.   The  preparation  of  these  tax  returns  requires  us  to  interpret  the  applicable  tax  laws  and
regulations in effect in such jurisdictions, which could affect the amount of tax we pay.  In consultation with our tax advisors, we
base our tax returns on interpretations that we believed to be reasonable under the circumstances.  The tax returns, however, are
subject to routine reviews by the various federal, state and foreign taxing authorities in the jurisdictions in which we or one of 
our subsidiaries file tax returns.  As part of these reviews, a taxing authority may disagree with respect to the income tax positions 
we have taken (“uncertain tax positions”) and, therefore, require us or one of our subsidiaries to pay additional taxes.

We accrue an amount for our estimate of probable additional income tax liability.  In certain cases,  the impact of an 
uncertain income tax position on the income tax return must be recognized at the largest amount that is more likely than not to
be sustained upon audit by the relevant tax authority.  An uncertain income tax position will not be recognized if it has less than 
50% likelihood of being sustained.  This requires significant judgment, the use of estimates, and the interpretation and application 
of  complex  tax  laws.    When  facts  and  circumstances  change,  we  reassess  these  probabilities  and  record  any  changes  in  the
consolidated financial statements as appropriate.  There were no material changes in our uncertain income tax positions for the
periods ended on August 31, 2017 and 2016.  During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2017, one of the Company’s subsidiaries 
received assessments claiming $2.6 million of taxes, penalties and interest related to withholding taxes on certain charges for
services rendered by the Company.  In addition, this subsidiary received assessments totaling $5.3 million for lack of deductibility 
of the underlying service charges due to the lack of withholding.  Based on the Company's interpretation of local law, rulings and 
jurisprudence (including Supreme Court precedents with respect to the deductibility assessment), the Company expects to prevail
in both instances and has not recorded a provision for these assessments.

We have not provided for U.S. deferred taxes on cumulative non-U.S. undistributed earnings as we deem such earnings
to be indefinitely reinvested.  It is not practicable to determine the U.S. federal income tax liability that would be associated with
the repatriation earnings because of the complexity of the computation.

Tax Receivables: We pay Value Added Tax (“VAT”) or similar taxes (“input VAT”), income taxes, and other taxes
within the normal course of our business in most of the countries in which we operate related to the procurement of merchandise
and/or services we acquires and/or on sales and taxable income.  We also collect VAT or similar taxes on behalf of the government 
(“output VAT”) for merchandise and/or services we sell.  If the output VAT exceeds the input VAT, then the difference is remitted 
to the government, usually on a monthly basis.  If the input VAT exceeds the output VAT, this creates a VAT receivable.  In 
most countries where we operate, the governments have implemented additional collection procedures, such as requiring credit 
card processors to remit a portion of sales processed via credit card directly to the government as advance payments of VAT 
and/or income tax.  In the case of VAT, these procedures alter the natural offset of input and output VAT and generally leave us
with a net VAT receivable, forcing us to process significant refund claims on a recurring basis.  With respect to income taxes 
paid, if the estimated income taxes paid or withheld exceed the actual income tax due this creates an income tax receivable.  We 

d

26

 
either request a refund of these tax receivables or apply the balance to expected future tax payments.  These refund or offset
processes can take anywhere from several months to several years to complete.

In most countries where the Company operates, the tax refund process is defined and structured with regular refunds or 
offsets.  However, as of August 31, 2017, in one country the government has alleged there is not a clearly defined process to
allow the  tax authorities to refund VAT receivables.  As of August 31, 2016, there were three countries that lacked a clearly 
defined process; however, during the third and fourth quarters of 2017, two of these countries clarified the refund mechanism, 
which we are currently pursuing. The Company, together with our tax and legal advisers, is currently seeking clarification in 
court in the country without a clearly defined process and expects to prevail. The balance of the VAT receivable in the country
with undefined refund mechanisms was approximately $1.2 million and $800,000 as of August 31, 2017 and August 31, 2016, 
respectively.  In another country in which the Company has warehouse clubs, beginning in fiscal year 2015, a new minimum 
income tax mechanism took effect, which requires us to pay taxes based on a percentage of sales rather than income.  As a result,
we are making income tax payments substantially in excess of those we would expect to pay based on taxable income. The current 
rules (which we have challenged in court) do not clearly allow us to obtain a refund or offset this excess income tax against other 
taxes.  As of August 31, 2017, the Company had deferred tax assets of approximately $2.0 million in this country.  Also, the
Company had an income tax receivable balance of $4.3 million as of August 31, 2017 related to excess payments from fiscal year 
2015 to 2017. We have not placed any type of allowance on the recoverability of these tax receivables or deferred tax assets
because we believe that it is more likely than not that we will ultimately succeed in our refund requests, related appeals and/or 
court challenge on this matter. 

Our policy for classification and presentation of VAT receivables, income tax receivables and other tax receivables is as

follows:

(cid:120)

(cid:120)

Short-term  VAT  and  Income  tax  receivables,  recorded  as  Other  current  assets:  This  classification  is  used  for  any
countries  where  our  subsidiary  has  generally  demonstrated the  ability  to  recover  the  VAT  or  income  tax  receivable 
within one year.  We also classify as short-term any approved refunds or credit notes to the extent that we expect to 
receive the refund or use the credit notes within one year. 

Long-term  VAT  and  Income  tax  receivables,  recorded  as  Other  non-current  assets:    This  classification  is  used  for 
amounts not approved for refund or credit in countries where our subsidiary has not demonstrated the ability to obtain 
refunds within one year and/or for amounts which are subject to outstanding disputes.  An allowance is provided against
VAT and income tax receivable balances in dispute when we do not expect to eventually prevail in its recovery. 

y

Long-lived Assets: We periodically evaluate our long-lived assets for indicators of impairment.  Indicators that an asset

may be impaired are:

(cid:120)
(cid:120)
(cid:120)
(cid:120)

the asset's inability to continue to generate income from operations and positive cash flow in future periods;
m
loss of legal ownership or title to the asset;
significant changes in its strategic business objectives and utilization of the asset(s); and
the impact of significant negative industry or economic trends.

Management's judgments are based on market and operational conditions at the time of the evaluation and can include 
management's best estimate of future business activity, which in turn drives estimates of future cash flows from these assets. 
These periodic evaluations could cause management to conclude that impairment factors exist, requiring an adjustment of these
assets  to  their  then-current  fair  market  value.    Future  business  conditions  and/or  activity  could  differ  materially  from  the
projections  made  by  management  causing  the  need  for  additional  impairment  charges.    No  impairment  charges  have  been 
recorded during fiscal year 2017 related to the loss of legal ownership or title to assets; significant  changes in the Company's
strategic business objectives or utilization of assets; or the impact of significant negative industry or economic trends.  Loss/(gain)
on  disposal  of  assets  recorded  during  the  years  reported  resulted  from  improvements  to  operations  and  normal  preventive
maintenance.

Seasonality

Historically, our merchandising businesses have experienced holiday retail seasonality in their markets.  In addition to 
seasonal fluctuations, our operating results fluctuate quarter-to-quarter as a result of economic and political events in markets that
we serve, the timing of holidays, weather, the timing of shipments, product mix, and currency effects on the cost of U.S.-sourced 
products  which  may  make  these  products  more  or  less  expensive  in  local  currencies  and  therefore  more  or  less  affordable.  
Because of such fluctuations, the results of operations of any quarter are not indicative of the results that may be achieved for a 
full fiscal year or any future quarter.  In addition, there can be no assurance that our future results will be consistent with past 
results or the projections of securities analysts.

h

ff

27

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

We are exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and commodity price risk. 
These market risks arise in the normal course of business. We do not engage in speculative trading activities. To manage the risk 
arising from these exposures, we utilize interest rate swaps, cross-currency interest rate swaps, non-deliverable foreign currency
forward  contracts  and  loans  denominated  in  foreign  currencies.  For  a  discussion  of  our  accounting  policies  for  derivative
instruments and further disclosures, please see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 12 - Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities.

Each market risk sensitivity analysis presented below is based on hypothetical scenarios used to calibrate potential risk 
and do not represent our view of future market changes. The effect of a change in a particular assumption is calculated without
adjusting any other assumption. In reality, however, a change in one factor could cause a change in another factor, which may 
n
magnify or negate other sensitivities.

Interest Rate Risk

We are exposed to changes in interest rates as a result of our short-term borrowings and long-term debt borrowings. We
have mitigated a portion of our interest rate risk by managing the mix of fixed and variable rate debt and by entering into interest 
rate swaps and cross-currency interest rate swaps to hedge interest rate risk. The notional amount, interest payment and maturity 
dates of the swap match the terms of the associated debt.

The table below provides information about our financial instruments that are sensitive to changes in interest rates. For
debt obligations, the table represents the principal cash flows and related weighted-average interest rates by expected maturity
dates. For interest rate swaps, including cross-currency interest rate swaps, the table represents the contractual cash flows and
weighted-average  interest  rates  by  the  contractual  maturity  date,  unless  otherwise  noted.  The  notional  amounts  are  used  to 
calculate  contractual  cash  flows  to  be  exchanged  under  the  contracts.  The  weighted-average  variable  rates  are  based  upon 
prevailing market interest rates and the outstanding balances as of August 31, 2017.

t

Annual maturities of long-term debt and derivatives are as follow (in thousands):

2018

2019

Twelve Months Ended August 31, 
(Amounts in thousands)
2021

2022

2020

Thereafter

Total

Long-Term Debt:

Long-term debt with fixed
interest rate
Weighted-average interest
rate
Long-term debt with variable
interest rate
Weighted-average interest
rate
Total long-term debt

Derivatives:

Interest Rate Swaps:
Variable to fixed interest
Weighted-average pay rate
Weighted-average receive 
rate

Cross-Currency Interest
Rate Swaps:
Variable to fixed interest
Weighted-average pay rate
Weighted-average receive 
rate

$

$

$

$

 5,414

 8.48%

 12,943

 4.39%

 18,357

$

$

$

 4,987

 8.48%

 13,159

 4.40%

 18,146

$

$

$

 3,810

 8.69%

 16,700

 3.63%

 20,510

$

$

$

 11,248

 8.40%

 2,443

 3.00%

 13,691

$

$

$

 400

 8.00%

 2,566

 3.00%

 2,966

$

$

$

 — $

 25,859

(1) 

 —%

 8.49%

 32,627

 3.00%

 32,627

$

$

 80,438

 3.59%

 106,297

(1) 

 3,200

$

 5,067

$

 6,626

$

 1,275

$

 1,275

$

 31,981

$

 49,424

 4.96%

 4.73%

$

 4,100

$

 9.48%

 4.58%

 4.97%

 4.73%

 4,100

 9.48%

 4.58%

 4.88%

 4.43%

 3.65%

 3.01%

$

 10,100

$

 7,788

$

 8.50%

 4.72%

 9.26%

 4.20%

 3.65%

 3.01%

 —
 —%

 —%

 3.65%

 3.01%

 4.03%

 3.49%

$

 26,088

 9.03%

 4.52%

 —%

 —%

(1) The  Company  has  disclosed  the  future  annual  maturities  of  long-term  debt,  for  which  it  has  entered  into  cross-currency 
interest rate swaps, using the derivative obligation as of August 31, 2017 to estimate the future commitments. Therefore, the
total annual commitments reflects these obligations, including the effect of the cross-currency interest rate swaps on the total-
long term debt as disclosed on the consolidated balance sheet.

Foreign Currency Risk

We have foreign currency risks related to sales, operating expenses and financing transactions in currencies other than 
the U.S. dollar. As of August 31, 2017, we had a total of 39 consolidated warehouse clubs operating in 12 foreign countries and 

28

one U.S. territory, 31 of which operate under currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Approximately 52% of our net warehouse 
sales are comprised of products we purchased in U.S. dollars and were sold in countries whose currencies were other than the
U.S. dollar. Approximately, 77% of our net  warehouse sales are in markets  whose functional currency is other than the U.S.
dollar. We may enter into additional foreign countries in the future or open additional locations in existing countries, which may 
increase the percentage of net warehouse sales denominated in foreign currencies.

ff

Currency  exchange  rate  changes  either  increase  or  decrease  the  cost  of  imported  products  that  we  purchase  in  U.S.
dollars and price in local currency. Price changes can impact the demand for those products in the market. Currency exchange 
rates also affect the reported sales of the consolidated company when local currency-denominated sales are translated to U.S.
dollars. In addition, we revalue all U.S. dollar denominated assets and liabilities within those markets that do not use the  U.S. 
dollar as the functional currency. These assets and liabilities include, but are not limited to, excess cash permanently reinvested 
offshore and the value of items shipped from the U.S. to our foreign markets. The gain or loss associated with this revaluation,
net of reserves, is recorded in other income (expense).

Foreign currencies in most of the countries where we operate have historically devalued against the U.S. dollar and are 
expected to continue to devalue.  The following tables summarize by country, for those countries with functional currencies other
than the U.S. dollar, the weakening of the countries' currency against the U.S. dollar (devaluation) or the strengthening of their
currencies (revaluation):

Country
Colombia
Costa Rica
Dominican Republic
Guatemala
Honduras
Jamaica
Nicaragua
Trinidad

Revaluation/(Devaluation)
Twelve Months Ended August 31,

2017
% Change

2016
% Change

 (0.11)%
 (4.19)%
 (3.52)%
 3.47 %
 (2.11)%
 (1.59)%
 (5.00)%
 (0.58)%

 5.39 %
 (2.99) %
 (2.04) %
 1.65 %
 (4.25) %
 (8.27) %
 (5.00) %
 (5.60) %

k
We seek to manage foreign exchange risk by (1) adjusting prices on goods acquir

ed in U.S. dollars on a periodic basis 
to maintain our target margins after taking into account changes in exchange rates; (2) obtaining local currency loans from banks
within certain markets where it is economical to do so and where management believes the risk of devaluation and the level of 
U.S. dollar denominated liabilities warrants this action; (3) reducing the time between the acquisition of product in U.S. dollars
and the settlement of that purchase in local currency; (4) maintaining a balance between assets held in local currency and in U.S. 
dollars; and (5) by entering into cross-currency interest rate swaps and forward currency derivatives. We have local-currency-
denominated long-term loans in Costa Rica, Trinidad and Tobago, Guatemala and Barbados; we have cross-currency interest rate 
swaps and forward currency derivatives in Costa Rica and Colombia; we have cross-currency interest rate swaps in Honduras
and we have interest rate swaps in Panama and El Salvador. Turbulence in the currency markets can have a significant impact on 
the value of the foreign currencies within the countries in which we operate. We report the gains or losses associated with  the
revaluation of these monetary assets and liabilities on our Consolidated Statements of Income under the heading “Other income
(expense),  net.”  Future  volatility  and  uncertainties  regarding  the  currencies  in  the  countries  that  we  operate  in  could  have  a 
material impact on our operations in future periods. However, there is no way to accurately forecast how currencies may trade in 
the future and, as a result, we cannot accurately project the impact of the change in rates on our future demand for imported 
products, reported sales, or financial results.

uu

29

We are exposed to foreign exchange risks related to U.S. dollar-denominated and other foreign-denominated cash, cash 
equivalents and restricted cash, to U.S. dollar-denominated intercompany debt balances and to other U.S. dollar-denominated 
debt/asset  balances  (excluding  U.S.  dollar-denominated  debt  obligations  for  which  we  hedge  a  portion  of  the  currency  risk 
inherent in the interest and principal payments), within entities whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar. The following 
table  discloses  the  net  effect  on  other  income  (expense)  for  these  U.S.  dollar-denominated  and  other  foreign-denominated
accounts relative to hypothetical simultaneous currency devaluation in all the countries listed in the table above, based on ba
lances 
as of August 31, 2017:

n

Gains based on change in 
U.S. dollar denominated 
and other foreign
denominated cash, cash
equivalents and restricted
cash balances (in
thousands)

(Losses) based on 
change in U.S. dollar 
denominated inter-
company balances (in
thousands)

(Losses) based on 
change in U.S. dollar 
denominated other
asset/liability balances,
(in thousands)

Net gain (loss)

$
$
$

 2,655
 5,310
 10,621

$
$
$

 (2,369) $
 (4,737) $
 (9,475) $

 (879) $
 (1,758) $
 (3,515) $

 (593)
 (1,185)
 (2,369)

Overall weighted 
negative currency
movement
5%
10%
20%

From time to time we have experienced a lack of availability of U.S. dollars in certain markets (U.S. dollar illiquidity).  
This impedes our ability to convert local currencies obtained through warehouse sales into U.S. dollars to settle the U.S. dollar 
liabilities associated with our imported products.  During fiscal year 2017 and continuing into fiscal year 2018, we experienced 
this  situation  in  Trinidad  (“TT”).    We  are  limited  in  our  ability  to  convert  TT  dollars  that  we  generated  through  sales  of 
merchandise into U.S. dollars to settle U.S. dollar liabilities, increasing our foreign exchange exposure to any devaluation of the 
TT dollar. We are working with our banks to source other tradable currencies (such as Euros and Canadian dollars), but until the
central bank in Trinidad makes more U.S. dollars available, this condition will continue and we plan to take steps to limit our
exposure to a potential devaluation. During part of the first half of fiscal year 2017 we maintained shipments of merchandise to 
Trinidad from our distribution center in Miami at levels that generally aligned with our Trinidad subsidiary’s ability to pay for 
the merchandise in U.S. dollars. This resulted in a reduced level of shipments, which negatively affected sales in the second 
quarter, particularly December, although by less than our initial estimate. These actions did not impact the level of merchandise 
we obtain locally in Trinidad.  Starting in the third quarter of fiscal year 2017, we were able to improve our sourcing of tradeable 
currencies, which allowed for a more normalized flow of imported merchandise during the third and fourth fiscal quarters.  Due
to the actions taken by us, as of August 31, 2017, our Trinidad subsidiary had net U.S. dollar denominated assets of approximat
ely 
$4.0 million. However the illiquidity situation remains in the Trinidad market, and we expect to face similar issues in sourcing
U.S. dollars during the first and second quarters of fiscal year 2018 to those we faced in the same quarters of fiscal year 201
7.
r
Going forward, we could again find ourselves in a net U.S. dollar denominated liability position that may require us to limit 
shipments from the U.S. to Trinidad in line with our ability to exchange Trinidad dollars for tradeable currencies or to reduce our 
exposure to a potential devaluation.  If, for example, a hypothetical 20% devaluation of the Trinidad currency occurred while w
e 
held levels of net U.S. denominated liabilities similar to those at August 31, 2016 ($18.9 million), the net effect on other expense 
would be approximately $3.8 million. This may result in once again limiting shipments to our Trinidad subsidiary, causing it to
run out of certain merchandise, from time to time, during fiscal year 2018.

x

d

f

ff

f

We are also exposed to foreign exchange risks related to local-currency-denominated cash and cash equivalents, to local-
currency-denominated  debt  obligations,  to  local-currency-denominated  current  assets  and  liabilities  and  to  local-currency-
denominated long-term assets and liabilities within entities whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar. The following ta
ble
discloses  the  net  effect  on  other  comprehensive  income  (loss)  for  these  local  currency  denominated  accounts  relative  to
hypothetical simultaneous currency devaluation in all the countries listed in the table above, based on balances as of August 31, 
2017:

w

Other comprehensive 
loss on the decline in
local currency 
denominated cash and 
cash equivalents and 
restricted cash (in
thousands)

Other 
comprehensive gain 
on the decline in
foreign currency
denominated debt
obligations (in 
thousands)

Other comprehensive 
loss on the decline in
all other foreign 
currency denominated
current assets net of 
current liabilities (in 
thousands)

Other comprehensive 
loss on the decline in
all other foreign 
currency denominated 
long-term assets net of 
long-term liabilities (in 
thousands)

$
$
$

 3,668
 7,335
 14,671

$
$
$

 (1,647)
 (3,295)
 (6,590)

$
$
$

 9,529
 19,057
 38,115

$
$
$

 13,363
 26,726
 53,451

Overall weighted 
negative currency
movement
5%
10%
20%

30

In addition, we are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations associated with our U.S. dollar-denominated
debt obligations that we hedge. We hedge a portion of the currency risk inherent in the interest and principal payments associa
ted 
with this debt through the use of cross-currency interest rate swaps. The terms of these swap agreements are commensurate with 
the underlying debt obligations. The aggregate fair value of these swaps was in a net asset position of approximately $1.3 million 
at August 31, 2017 and approximately $1.2 million at August 31, 2016. A hypothetical 10% increase in the currency exchange 
rates underlying these swaps from the market rates at August 31, 2017 would have resulted in a further increase in the value of 
the swaps of approximately $654,000. Conversely, a hypothetical 10% decrease in the currency exchange rates underlying these
swaps from the market rates at August 31, 2017 would have resulted in a net decrease in the value of the swaps of approximately
of $574,000.

y

f

We use non-deliverable forward foreign exchange contracts primarily to address exposure to U.S. dollar merchandise 
inventory expenditures made by our international subsidiaries whose functional currency is other than the U.S. dollar. Currently,
these contracts do not qualify for derivative hedge accounting. The market risk related to foreign currency forward contracts is
measured by estimating the potential impact of a 10% change in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to the local currency exchange 
rates. The net increase or decrease in the fair value of these derivative instruments are economically offset by the gains or losses
on the underlying transactions. 

Commodity Price Risk

The increasing price of oil and certain commodities could have a negative effect on our operating costs and sales. Higher
oil prices can negatively impact the economic growth of the countries in which we operate, thereby reducing the buying power 
of  our  members.  Higher  oil  prices  can  also  increase  our  operating  costs,  particularly  utilities  and  distribution  expenses.
Inflationary pressures on various commodities also may impact consumer spending. We do not currently seek to hedge commodity 
price risk.

There have been no changes in the Company's internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) or 
15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act), during the fiscal year ended August 31, 2017, that have materially affected, or are reasonably 
likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

The certifications required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 are filed as Exhibit 31.1 and 31.2 to this 

report.

31

 
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of PriceSmart, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of PriceSmart, Inc. as of August 31, 2017 and 2016, and the
related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years
in the period ended August 31, 2017. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a).
These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures 
in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable
basis for our opinion.

f

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position 
of PriceSmart, Inc. at August 31, 2017 and 2016, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the 
three years in the period ended August 31, 2017, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our
opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
present fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), 
PriceSmart Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of August 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control-
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) 
and our report dated October 26, 2017, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

San Diego, California
October 26, 2017

32

PRICESMART, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)

ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
Short-term restricted cash
Receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $7 as of August 31, 2017 and $7 as 
of August 31, 2016, respectively
Merchandise inventories
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 
Total current assets
Long-term restricted cash
Property and equipment, net
Goodwill
Deferred tax assets 
Other non-current assets (includes $2,547 and $3,224 as of August 31, 2017 and August 
31, 2016, respectively, for the fair value of derivative instruments)
Investment in unconsolidated affiliates
Total Assets
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

Short-term borrowings
Accounts payable
Accrued salaries and benefits
Deferred membership income
Income taxes payable
Other accrued expenses (includes $0 and $110 as of August 31, 2017 and August 31, 2016,
respectively, for the fair value of foreign currency forward contracts)
Long-term debt, current portion
Total current liabilities
Deferred tax liability 
Long-term portion of deferred rent
Long-term income taxes payable, net of current portion
Long-term debt, net of current portion
Other long-term liabilities (includes $682 and $1,514 for the fair value of derivative 
instruments and $5,051 and $4,013 for post employment plans as of August 31, 2017 and 
August 31, 2016, respectively)
Total Liabilities

August 31,

2017

2016

$

 162,434
 460

$

 6,460
 310,946

 510,370
 2,818
 557,829
 35,642
 15,412

 199,522
 518

 7,464
 282,907
 22,143
 512,554
 2,676
 473,045
 35,637
 12,258

$

$

 44,678
 10,765
 1,177,514

$

 49,798
 10,767
 1,096,735

 — $

 272,248
 19,151
 22,100
 5,044

 26,483
 18,358
 363,384
 1,812
 8,914
 909
 87,939

 16,534
 267,173
 19,606
 20,920
 4,226

 24,880
 14,565
 367,904
 1,760
 8,961
 970
 73,542

 5,789
 468,747

 5,527
 458,664

33

 
 
Equity:
Common stock $0.0001 par value, 45,000,000 shares authorized; 31,275,727 and 
31,237,658 shares issued and 30,400,742 and 30,401,307 shares outstanding (net of 
treasury shares) as of August 31, 2017 and August 31, 2016, respectively
Additional paid-in capital
Tax benefit from stock-based compensation
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
Retained earnings
Less: treasury stock at cost, 874,985 and 836,531 shares as of August 31, 2017 and August 
31, 2016, respectively
Total Equity
Total Liabilities and Equity

 3
 422,762
 11,486
 (110,059)
 420,499

 3
 412,369
 11,321
 (103,951)
 351,060

 (35,924)
 708,767
 1,177,514

$

 (32,731)
 638,071
 1,096,735

$

See accompanying notes.

34

PRICESMART, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

Revenues:
Net warehouse club sales
Export sales
Membership income
Other income
Total revenues
Operating expenses:
Cost of goods sold:
Net warehouse club
Export
Selling, general and administrative:
Warehouse club operations
General and administrative
Pre-opening expenses
Loss/(gain) on disposal of assets
Total operating expenses
Operating income
Other income (expense):
Interest income
Interest expense
Other income (expense), net
Total other income (expense)
Income before provision for income taxes and 
income (loss) of unconsolidated affiliates
Provision for income taxes
Income (loss) of unconsolidated affiliates
Net income
Net income per share available for distribution:
Basic net income per share
Diluted net income per share
Shares used in per share computations:

Diluted
Dividends per share

Years Ended August 31,
2016

2015

2017

$

$

 2,910,062
 34,244
 47,743
 4,579
 2,996,628

$

 2,820,740
 33,813
 45,781
 4,842
 2,905,176

 2,721,132
 33,279
 43,673
 4,519
 2,802,603

 2,487,146
 32,606

 268,629
 70,013
 44
 1,961
 2,860,399
 136,229

 1,809
 (6,777)
 1,482
 (3,486)

 132,743
 (42,018)
 (1)
 90,724

 2,417,366
 32,260

 252,130
 64,344
 1,191
 1,162
 2,768,453
 136,723

 1,307
 (5,891)
 (899)
 (5,483)

 131,240
 (42,849)
 332
 88,723

 2.98
 2.98

 30,020
 30,023
 0.70

$
$

$

 2.92
 2.92

 29,928
 29,933
 0.70

$
$

$

 2,321,074
 31,765

 241,285
 56,371
 3,737
 2,005
 2,656,237
 146,366

 1,058
 (6,440)
 (4,388)
 (9,770)

 136,596
 (47,566)
 94
 89,124

 2.95
 2.95

 29,848
 29,855
 0.70

$

$
$

$

See accompanying notes.

35

PRICESMART, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)

Net income

Foreign currency translation adjustments (1)
Defined benefit pension plan:

Net gain (loss) arising during period
Amortization of prior service cost and actuarial gains included in 
net periodic pensions cost
Total defined benefit pension plan
Derivative instruments: (2)

Unrealized gains/(losses) on change in 
derivative obligations
Unrealized gains/(losses) on change in 
fair value of interest rate swaps
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss) to other income (expense), for settlement of 
derivatives

Total derivative instruments
Other comprehensive income (loss)
Comprehensive income

Years Ended August 31,
2016

2015

2017

 90,724

$

 88,723

$

 89,124

 (6,297) $

 (1,702) $

 (50,130)

 (166)

 39
 (127)

 81

 254

 (182)

 (20)
 (202)

 65

 (291)
 (226)

 1,826

 (2,598)

 (2,361)

 828

 (19)
 316
 (6,108)
 84,616

$

 —
 (535)
 (2,439)
 86,284

$

 (100)
 (1,870)
 (52,226)
 36,898

$

$

$

Translation adjustments arising in translating the financial statements of a foreign entity have no effect on the income taxes 
of  that  foreign  entity.   They  may,  however,  affect:  (a)  the amount,  measured  in  the  parent  entity's  reporting  currency,  of 
withholding taxes assessed on dividends paid to the parent entity and (b) the amount of taxes assessed on the parent entity 
by the government of its country.  The Company has determined that the reinvestment of earnings of its foreign subsidiaries 
are indefinite because of the long-term nature of the Company's foreign investment plans.  Therefore, deferred taxes are not
provided for on translation adjustments related to non-remitted earnings of the Company's foreign subsidiaries.

(2) See Note 12 - Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.

See accompanying notes.

36

.

C
N
I

,

T
R
A
M
S
E
C
I
R
P

Y
T
I
U
Q
E
F
O
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S
D
E
T
A
D
I
L
O
S
N
O
C

)
S
D
N
A
S
U
O
H
T
N
I
S
T
N
U
O
M
A

(

—

—

9
4

)
7
7
6
,
4
(

5
6
2
,
8
4
5

5
7
1
,
7

)
6
2
1
,
1
2
(

4
2
1
,
9
8

)
6
2
2
,
2
5
(

4
8
5
,
6
6
5

)
4
3
3
,
3
(

—

0
8

1
3
7
,
9

3
2
7
,
8
8

)
9
3
4
,
2
(

)
4
7
2
,
1
2
(

)
3
9
1
,
3
(

1
7
0
,
8
3
6

—

—

4
0
7

4
5
8
,
9

4
2
7
,
0
9

)
8
0
1
,
6
(

)
5
8
2
,
1
2
(

7
6
7
,
8
0
7

$
)
0
2
7
,
4
2
(

)
7
7
6
,
4
(

$

1
4
7

2
5

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

$
)
7
9
3
,
9
2
(

)
4
3
3
,
3
(

$

3
9
7

3
4

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

$
)
1
3
7
,
2
3
(

)
3
9
1
,
3
(

$

6
3
8

9
3

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

$
)
4
2
9
,
5
3
(

$

5
7
8

3
1
6
,
5
1
2

$
)
6
8
2
,
9
4
(

$

5
0
5
,
9

$

0
5
1
,
7
9
3

$

3

$

1
5
9
0
3

,

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

)
6
2
1
,
1
2
(

4
2
1
,
9
8

1
1
6
,
3
8
2

—

)
4
7
2
,
1
2
(

3
2
7
,
8
8

0
6
0
,
1
5
3

—

—

—

—

—

—

)
5
8
2
,
1
2
(

4
2
7
,
0
9

9
9
4
,
0
2
4

—

—
—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

)
6
2
2
,
2
5
(

$
)
2
1
5
,
1
0
1
(

)
9
3
4
,
2
(

$
)
1
5
9
,
3
0
1
(

—
—

—

—
—

—

—

—

—
—

)
8
0
1
,
6
(

$
)
9
5
0
,
0
1
1
(

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

6
0
2
,
1

—

—

—

9
4

—

—

—

9
6
9
,
5

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

3
3

)
9
(

3

—

—

—

—

$

1
1
7
,
0
1

$

8
6
1
,
3
0
4

$

3

$

8
7
9
0
3

,

—

—

—

0
1
6

—

—

—

—

—

0
8

1
2
1
,
9

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

6
5
2

4

—

—

—

—

$

1
2
3
,
1
1

$

9
6
3
,
2
1
4

$

3

$

8
3
2
1
3

,

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

5
6
1

—

—

—

4
0
7

9
8
6
,
9

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

3
6

)
7
3
(

2
1

—

—

—

—

$

6
8
4
,
1
1

$

2
6
7
,
2
2
4

$

3

$

6
7
2
1
3

,

l
a
t
o
T

y
t
i
u
q
E

k
c
o
t
S
y
r
u
s
a
e
r
T

t
n
u
o
m
A

s
e
r
a
h
S

d
e
n
i
a
t
e
R

s
g
n
i
n
r
a
E

d
e
t
a
l
u
m
u
c
c
A

r
e
h
t
O

e
v
i
s
n
e
h
e
r
p
m
o
C

)
s
s
o
L
(
e
m
o
c
n
I

t
i
f
e
n
e
B
x
a
T

m
o
r
F

d
e
s
a
B
k
c
o
t
S

n
o
i
t
a
s
n
e
p
m
o
C

l
a
n
o
i
t
i
d
d
A

n
i
-
d
i
a
P

l
a
t
i
p
a
C

k
c
o
t
S
n
o
m
m
o
C

t
n
u
o
m
A

s
e
r
a
h
S

s
d
r
a
w
a
k
c
o
t
s

d
e
t
c
i
r
t
s
e
r

f
o
e
r
u
t
i
e
f
r
o
F

s
r
e
d
l
o
h
k
c
o
t
s
o
t
d
i
a
p
d
n
e
d
i
v
i
D

n
o
i
t
a
s
n
e
p
m
o
c
d
e
s
a
b
-
k
c
o
t
S

s
n
o
i
t
p
o

k
c
o
t
s

f
o
e
s
i
c
r
e
x
E

e
m
o
c
n
i

t
e
N

)
s
s
o
l
(

e
m
o
c
n
i

e
v
i
s
n
e
h
e
r
p
m
o
c

r
e
h
t
O

d
r
a
w
a
k
c
o
t
s

d
e
t
c
i
r
t
s
e
r

f
o
e
c
n
a
u
s
s
I

s
r
e
d
l
o
h
k
c
o
t
s
o
t
d
i
a
p
d
n
e
d
i
v
i
D

n
o
i
t
a
s
n
e
p
m
o
c
d
e
s
a
b
-
k
c
o
t
S

s
n
o
i
t
p
o

k
c
o
t
s

f
o
e
s
i
c
r
e
x
E

5
1
0
2
,
1
3

t
s
u
g
u
A

t
a

e
c
n
a
l
a
B

k
c
o
t
s
y
r
u
s
a
e
r
t

f
o
e
s
a
h
c
r
u
P

e
m
o
c
n
i

t
e
N

)
s
s
o
l
(

e
m
o
c
n
i

e
v
i
s
n
e
h
e
r
p
m
o
c

r
e
h
t
O

6
1
0
2
,
1
3

t
s
u
g
u
A

t
a

e
c
n
a
l
a
B

k
c
o
t
s
y
r
u
s
a
e
r
t

f
o
e
s
a
h
c
r
u
P

s
d
r
a
w
a
k
c
o
t
s

d
e
t
c
i
r
t
s
e
r

f
o
e
r
u
t
i
e
f
r
o
F

d
r
a
w
a
k
c
o
t
s

d
e
t
c
i
r
t
s
e
r

f
o
e
c
n
a
u
s
s
I

)
s
s
o
l
(

e
m
o
c
n
i

e
v
i
s
n
e
h
e
r
p
m
o
c

r
e
h
t
O

7
1
0
2
,
1
3

t
s
u
g
u
A

t
a

e
c
n
a
l
a
B

s
r
e
d
l
o
h
k
c
o
t
s
o
t
d
i
a
p
d
n
e
d
i
v
i
D

n
o
i
t
a
s
n
e
p
m
o
c
d
e
s
a
b
-
k
c
o
t
S

s
n
o
i
t
p
o

k
c
o
t
s

f
o
e
s
i
c
r
e
x
E

e
m
o
c
n
i

t
e
N

4
1
0
2
,
1
3
t
s
u
g
u
A

t
a

e
c
n
a
l
a
B

k
c
o
t
s
y
r
u
s
a
e
r
t

f
o
e
s
a
h
c
r
u
P

k
c
o
t
s

d
e
t
c
i
r
t
s
e
r

f
o
e
c
n
a
u
s
s
I

7
3

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PRICESMART, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)

Operating Activities:
Net income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities:
Depreciation and amortization
Allowance for doubtful accounts
(Gain)/loss on sale of property and equipment
Deferred income taxes
Excess tax benefit on stock-based compensation
Equity in (gains) losses of unconsolidated affiliates
Stock-based compensation
Proceeds from the settlement of derivatives
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
Receivables, prepaid expenses and other current assets, accrued salaries and 
benefits, deferred membership income and other accruals
Merchandise inventories
Accounts payable
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
Investing Activities:
Additions to property and equipment
Deposits for land purchase option agreements
Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment
Capital contributions to joint ventures
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
Financing Activities:
Proceeds from long-term bank borrowings
Repayment of long-term bank borrowings
Proceeds from short-term bank borrowings
Repayment of short-term bank borrowings
Repayment of long-term debt with cross-currency interest rate swaps
Cash dividend payments
Excess tax benefit on stock-based compensation
Purchase of treasury stock
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at beginning of period
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at end of period

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest, net of amounts capitalized
Income taxes

Years Ended August 31,
2016

2017

2015

$

 90,724 $

 88,723

$

 89,124

 46,292
 —
 1,961
 (2,845)
 (165)
 1
 9,689
 —

 1,894
 (28,039)
 3,344
 122,856

 (135,294)
 (300)
 377
 —
 (135,217)

 47,700
 (29,395)
 678
 (17,179)
 —
 (21,285)
 165
 (3,193)
 704
 (21,805)
 (2,838)
 (37,004)
 202,716
 165,712

$

 39,794
 7
 1,162
 2,875
 (610)
 (332)
 9,121
 —

 (6,679)
 (15,732)
 23,202
 141,531

 (77,700)
 (442)
 86
 (119)
 (78,175)

 14,370
 (16,525)
 28,927
 (19,314)
 —
 (21,274)
 610
 (3,334)
 80
 (16,460)
 (2,777)
 44,119
 158,597
 202,716

 5,915 $
 48,530 $

 4,903
 51,238

$

$
$

 34,445
 —
 2,005
 2,972
 (1,206)
 (94)
 5,969
 8,543

 (7,807)
 (40,792)
 16,423
 109,582

 (89,185)
 1,095
 368
 (1,360)
 (89,082)

 52,977
 (30,905)
 51,664
 (42,143)
 (24,000)
 (21,126)
 1,206
 (4,677)
 49
 (16,955)
 (11,412)
 (7,867)
 166,464
 158,597

 6,093
 44,174

$

$
$

38

The following table provides a reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash reported within the

statement of financial position that sum to the total of the same amounts shown in the statement of cash flows:

Years Ended August 31,
2016
 199,522
 518
 2,676

2017
 162,434
 460
 2,818

$

$

2015
 157,072
 61
 1,464

$

 165,712

$

 202,716

$

 158,597

Cash and cash equivalents

$

Long-term restricted cash
Total Cash, Cash equivalents, and restricted cash shown in statement of cash 
flows

See accompanying notes.

39

PRICESMART, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1 – COMPANY OVERVIEW AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

PriceSmart,  Inc.’s  (“PriceSmart,”  the  “Company,”  or  "we")  business  consists  primarily  of  international  membership
shopping warehouse clubs similar to, but smaller in size than, warehouse clubs in the United States.  As of August 31, 2017, the
Company had 39 consolidated warehouse clubs in operation in 12 countries and one U.S. territory (seven in Colombia; six in 
Costa Rica; five in Panama; four in Trinidad; three each in Guatemala, Honduras and the Dominican Republic; two each in El 
Salvador and Nicaragua; and one each in Aruba, Barbados, Jamaica, and the United States Virgin Islands), of which the Company
owns 100% of the corresponding legal entities (see Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies).  The Company opened 
a new warehouse club in Chia, Colombia in September 2016, fiscal year 2017, bringing the total of warehouse clubs operating in 
Colombia to seven.  The Company opened a new warehouse club in Managua, Nicaragua in November 2015, fiscal year 2016, 
bringing the total of warehouse clubs operating in Nicaragua to two. In February 2017 the Company acquired land in Santa Ana,
Costa Rica upon which the Company opened a new warehouse club on October 5, 2017. This new warehouse club brings the
number of PriceSmart warehouse clubs operating in Costa Rica to seven. In June 2017, the Company acquired land in Santo 
Domingo, Dominican Republic. The Company is currently building a warehouse club on this site that the Company expects to
open in the spring of calendar year 2018. This will bring the number of PriceSmart warehouse clubs operating in Dominican 
Republic to four.

The Company continues to explore other potential sites for future warehouse clubs in Central America, the Caribbean 

and Colombia. 

Basis of Presentation - The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally 
accepted  accounting  principles.  The  consolidated  financial  statements  include  the  accounts  of  PriceSmart,  Inc.,  a  Delaware
corporation, and its subsidiaries. Intercompany transactions between the Company and its subsidiaries have been eliminated in 
consolidation.

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Principles of Consolidation – The consolidated financial statements of the Company included herein include the assets, 
liabilities and results of operations of the Company’s wholly owned subsidiaries and the investments and operating results of 
joint ventures recorded under the equity method.  All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated 
in consolidation. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company pursuant to the rules and regulations
of  the  SEC  and  reflect  all  adjustments  (consisting  of  normal  recurring  adjustments)  that  are,  in  the  opinion  of  management, 
necessary to fairly present the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows for the periods presented.  As of August 31,
2017,  all  of  the  Company's  subsidiaries  were  wholly  owned.   Additionally,  the  Company's  ownership  interest  in  real  estate
development joint ventures as of August 31, 2017 is listed below:

Real Estate Development Joint Ventures
GolfPark Plaza, S.A.
Price Plaza Alajuela PPA, S.A.

Countries
Panama
Costa Rica

Ownership

 50.0 %
 50.0 %

Basis of
Presentation
Equity(1)
Equity(1)

(1)

Joint venture interests are recorded as investment in unconsolidated affiliates on the consolidated balance sheets.

ff

Use of Estimates – The preparation of  financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to 
make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying 
notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Variable Interest Entities – The Company reviews and determines at the start of each arrangement, or subsequently if 
a reconsideration event occurs, whether any of its investments in joint ventures constitute a Variable Interest Entity (“VIE”) and 
whether it must consolidate a VIE and/or disclose information about its involvement in a VIE. The Company has determined that
the joint ventures for GolfPark Plaza, S.A. and Plaza Price Alajuela PPA, S.A. are VIEs.  The Company has determined that it is
not the primary beneficiary of the VIEs and, therefore, has accounted for these entities under the equity method.

n

Cash and Cash Equivalents – Cash and cash equivalents represent cash and short-term investments with maturities of 
three months or less when purchased and proceeds due from credit and debit card transactions, which are generally settled within
a few days of the underlying transaction.

–

F-40

 
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) 

Restricted Cash – The changes in restricted cash are disclosed within the consolidated statement of cash flows based

n

on the nature of the restriction. The following table summarizes the restricted cash reported by the Company (in thousands):

Short-term restricted cash:
Restricted cash for land purchase option agreements
Other short-term restricted cash
Total short-term restricted cash

Long-term restricted cash:
Other long-term restricted cash (1)
Total long-term restricted cash
Total restricted cash

August 31,
2017

August 31,
2016

$

$

$
$
$

 300
 160
 460

 2,818
 2,818
 3,278

$

$

$
$
$

 442

 518

 2,676
 2,676
 3,194

(1) Other long-term restricted cash consists mainly of cash deposits held within banking institutions in compliance with federal 

regulatory requirements in Costa Rica and Panama.

Tax Receivables – The Company pays Value Added Tax (“VAT”) or similar taxes (“input VAT”), income taxes, and 
other taxes within the normal course of its business in most of the countries in which it operates related to the procurement o
f 
f
merchandise and/or services it acquires and/or on sales and taxable income.  The Company also collects VAT or similar taxes on 
behalf of the government (“output VAT”) for merchandise and/or services it sells.  If the output VAT exceeds the input VAT,
then the difference is remitted to the government, usually on a monthly basis.  If the input VAT exceeds the output VAT, this 
creates  a  VAT  receivable.  In  most  countries  where  the  Company  operates,  the  governments  have  implemented  additional
collection procedures, such as requiring credit and debit card processors to remit a portion of sales processed via credit and debit 
card directly to the government as advance payments of VAT and/or income tax.  In the case of VAT, these procedures alter the 
natural offset of input and output VAT and generally leave the Company with a net VAT receivable, forcing the Company to 
process significant refund claims on a recurring basis. With respect to income taxes paid, if the estimated income taxes paid or 
withheld exceed the actual income tax due, this creates an income tax receivable.  The Company either requests a refund of these 
tax receivables or applies the balance to expected future tax payments.  These refund or offset processes can take anywhere from 
several months to several years to complete. 

f

f

In most countries where the Company operates, the tax refund process is defined and structured with regular refunds or 
offsets.  However, as of August 31, 2017, in one country the government has alleged there is not a clearly defined process to
allow the  tax authorities to refund VAT receivables.  As of August 31, 2016, there were three countries that lacked a clearly 
defined process; however, during the third and fourth quarters of 2017, two of these countries clarified the refund mechanism,
which we are currently pursuing. The Company, together with our tax and legal advisers, is currently seeking clarification in
court in the remaining country without a clearly defined process and expects to prevail. The balance of the VAT receivable in the
country with undefined refund mechanisms was approximately $1.2 million and $800,000 as of August 31, 2017 and August 31,
2016, respectively.  In another country in which the Company operates warehouse clubs, a new minimum income tax mechanism 
took effect in fiscal year 2015, which requires the Company to pay taxes based on a percentage of sales rather than income. As a
result, the Company is making income tax payments substantially in excess of those it would expect to pay based on taxable 
income. The current rules (which the Company has challenged in court) do not clearly allow the Company to obtain a refund or 
to offset this excess income tax against other taxes. As of August 31, 2017, the Company had deferred tax assets of approximate
ly
t
$2.0 million in this country. Also, the Company had an income tax receivable balance of  $4.3 million as of August 31, 2017 
related  to  excess  payments  from  fiscal  years  2015  to  2017.  The  Company  has  not  placed  any  type  of  allowance  on  the
recoverability of these tax receivables or deferred tax assets because the Company believes that it is more likely than not that it
will ultimately succeed in its refund requests, related appeals and/or court challenge on this matter. 

The  Company's  policy  for  classification  and  presentation  of  VAT  receivables,  income  tax  receivables  and  other  tax 

AA

receivables is as follows:

(cid:120)

Short-term  VAT  and  income  tax  receivables,  recorded  as  Other  current  assets:  This  classification  is  used  for  any 
countries  where the Company's subsidiary  has  generally demonstrated the ability to recover the VAT or income tax
receivable within one year.  The Company also classifies as short-term any approved refunds or credit notes to the extent
that the Company expects to receive the refund or use the credit notes within one year. 

F-41

  
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) 

(cid:120)

Long-term  VAT  and  income  tax  receivables,  recorded  as  Other  non-current  assets:    This  classification  is  used  for 
amounts not approved for refund or credit in countries where the Company's subsidiary has not demonstrated the ability
to obtain refunds within one year and/or for amounts which are subject to outstanding disputes.  An allowance is provided
against VAT and income tax receivable balances in dispute when the Company does not expect to eventually prevail in
its recovery. The Company does not currently have any allowances provided against VAT and income tax receivables.

The following table summarizes the VAT receivables reported by the Company (in thousands):

Prepaid expenses and other current assets
Other non-current assets
Total amount of VAT receivable reported

August 31,
2017

August 31,
2016

$

$

 6,650
 24,904
 31,554

$

$

 1,635
 32,502
 34,137

The following table summarizes the income tax receivables reported by the Company (in thousands):

Prepaid expenses and other current assets
Other non-current assets
Total amount of income tax receivable reported

August 31,
2017

August 31,
2016

$

$

 6,403
 10,492
 16,895

$

$

 6,402
 10,376
 16,778

–

Lease  Accounting  –  Certain  of  the  Company's  operating  leases  wher

e  the  Company  is  the  lessee  (see  "Revenue
Recognition Policy" for lessor accounting) provide for minimum annual payments that increase over the life of the lease. The
aggregate minimum annual payments are expensed on the straight-line basis beginning when the Company takes possession of 
the  property  and  extending  over  the  term  of  the  related  lease  including  renewal  options  when  the  exercise  of  the  option  is 
reasonably assured as an economic penalty may be incurred if the option is not exercised. The amount by which straight-line rent 
exceeds actual lease payment requirements in the early years of the leases is accrued as deferred rent and reduced in later years 
when  the  actual  cash  payment  requirements  exceed  the  straight-line  expense. The  Company  also  accounts  in  its  straight-line
computation for the effect of  any  “rental  holidays” and lessor-paid tenant improvements. In addition to the  minimum annual 
payments, in certain locations, the Company pays  additional contingent rent based on a contractually stipulated percentage of 
sales.

Merchandise Inventories – Merchandise inventories, which include merchandise for resale, are valued at the lower of 
cost (average cost) or market. The Company provides for estimated inventory losses and obsolescence between physical inventory 
counts on the basis of a percentage of sales. The provision is adjusted periodically to reflect the trend of actual physical inventory
count results, with physical inventories occurring primarily in the second and fourth fiscal quarters. In addition, the Company
may be required to take markdowns below the carrying cost of certain inventory to expedite the sale of such merchandise.

f

Stock Based Compensation – The Company offers three types of equity awards: stock options (“options”), restricted 
stock awards (“RSAs”) and restricted stock unit (“RSUs”). Compensation related to options is accounted for by applying the
valuation technique based on the Black-Scholes model. Compensation related to RSAs and RSUs is based on the fair market 
value at the time of grant with the application of an estimated forfeiture rate. The Company recognizes the compensation cost
related to these awards over the requisite service period as determined by the grant, amortized ratably or on a straight line basis
over the life of the grant. The Company utilizes “modified grant-date accounting” for true-ups due to actual forfeitures at the
vesting  dates.  The  Company  records  the  tax  savings  resulting  from  tax  deductions  in  excess  of  expense  for  stock-based
compensation as additional paid-in capital and the tax deficiency resulting from stock-based compensation in excess of the related
tax deduction as a reduction in paid-in capital, based on the Tax Law Ordering method. In addition, the Company reflects the tax 
savings  (deficiency)  resulting  from  the  taxation  of  stock-based compensation  as  a  financing  cash  flow  in  its  consolidated 
statement of cash flows, rather than as an operating cash flow.

RSAs have the same cash dividend and voting rights as other common stock and are considered to be currently issued 
and outstanding shares of common stock. Shares of common stock subject to RSUs are not issued nor outstanding until vested, 
and RSUs do not have the same dividend and voting rights as common stock. However, all outstanding RSUs have accompanying
dividend equivalents, requiring payment to the employees and directors with unvested RSUs of amounts equal to the dividend 
they would have received had the shares of common stock underlying the RSUs been actually issued and outstanding. Payments
of dividend equivalents to employees are recorded as compensation expense.

F-42

  
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) 

Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations – In January 2017, the Company purchased a distribution center in Medley, Miami-
Dade  County,  Florida. The  Company  transferred  its  Miami  dry  distribution  center  activities  that  were  previously  in  a  leased 
facility to the new facility during the third quarter of fiscal year 2017. As part of this transaction, the Company has recorded an
exit obligation related to the lease of the previous distribution center. The obligation consists of the costs associated with the exit 
or disposal activity measured initially at its fair value as of May 1, 2017, the date on which the obligation was incurred. The
se 
costs are primarily comprised of the costs to terminate the operating lease and other associated costs, including costs to consolidate
or close facilities, net of any potential sub-lease income the Company could receive during the remaining lease term. In periods
subsequent to initial measurement, changes to the exit obligation, including any changes resulting from a revision to either  the
timing or the amount of estimated cash flows over the remaining lease period, is measured using the credit-adjusted risk-free rate 
that was used to measure the initial obligation. During the third quarter of fiscal year 2017, the Company initially recorded an
obligation  related  to  this  exit  activity  for  approximately  $496,000  within  other  long-term  liabilities.  The  Company’s  exit
obligation recorded as of August 31, 2017 is approximately $57,000. Exit costs of approximately $1.4 million were recorded to
net warehouse club cost of goods sold for the twelve months ended August 31, 2017.

f

Fair  Value  Measurements  – The  Company  measures  the  fair  value  for  all  financial  and  nonfinancial  assets  and
liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the consolidated financial statements on a recurring or nonrecurr
ing
basis.    The  fair  value  of  an  asset  is  the  price  at  which  the  asset  could  be  sold  in  an  orderly  transaction  between  unrelated,
knowledgeable and willing parties able to engage in the transaction. A liability’s fair value is defined as the amount that would 
 parties, not the amount that would be paid to settle
y
be paid to transfer the liability to a new obligor in a transaction between such
the liability with the creditor.

t

The  Company  has  established  a  three-tier  fair  value  hierarchy,  which  prioritizes  the  inputs  used  in  measuring  and
revaluing fair value. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; Level 2,
defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3, defined 
as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions.
The
Company was not required to revalue any assets or liabilities utilizing Level 1 or Level 3 inputs at the balance sheet dates.  The 
Company's Level 2 assets and liabilities revalued at the balance sheet dates, on a recurring basis, consisted of cash flow hedges 
(interest rate swaps and cross-currency interest rate swaps) and forward foreign exchange contracts.  In addition, the Company
utilizes Level 2 inputs in determining the fair value of long-term debt.  The Company has elected not to revalue long-term debt
because this debt will be settled at the carrying value and not at the fair market value.  The Company did not make any significant
transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value tiers during the periods reported on herein.

n

Nonfinancial assets and liabilities are revalued and recognized at fair value subsequent to initial recognition when there 

is evidence of impairment.   For the periods reported, no impairment of such nonfinancial assets was recorded.

The disclosure of fair value of certain financial assets and liabilities recorded at cost is as follows:

Cash and cash equivalents: The carrying value approximates fair value due to the short maturity of these instruments.

Short-term restricted cash:  The carrying value approximates fair value due to the short maturity of these instruments.

Long-term restricted cash:  Long-term restricted cash primarily consists of auto renewable 3-12 month certificates of 
deposit, which are held as collateral against our long-term debt. The carrying value approximates fair value due to the 
maturity of the underlying certificates of deposit within the normal operating cycle of the Company.

Accounts receivable:  The carrying value approximates fair value due to the short maturity of these accounts.

Short-term VAT and Income tax receivables:  The carrying value approximates fair value due to the short maturity of 
these accounts.

Long-term VAT and income tax receivables: The fair value of long-term receivables would normally be measured using 
a discounted cash flow analysis based on the current market interest rates for similar types of financial instruments, with
an estimate of the time these receivables are expected to be outstanding. The Company is not able to provide an estimate
as to the time these receivables, owed to the Company by various government agencies, are expected to be outstanding;
therefore, the Company has not presented a fair value on the long-term VAT and income tax receivables.

Short-term debt: The carrying value approximates fair value due to the short maturity of these instruments.

F-43

  
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) 

Long-term debt: The fair value of debt is generally measured using a discounted cash flow analysis based on current
market interest rates for similar types of financial instruments.  These inputs are not quoted prices in active markets but 
they are either directly or indirectly observable; therefore, they are classified as Level 2 inputs. The carrying value and 
fair value of the Company’s debt as of August 31, 2017 and August 31, 2016 is as follows (in thousands):

August 31, 2017

August 31, 2016

Carrying
Value

Fair
Value(1)

Carrying
Value

Fair
Value

Long-term debt, including current portion

$

 106,297

$

 102,911

$

 88,107

$

 85,654

(1) The Company has disclosed the fair value of long-term debt, including debt for which it has entered into cross-currency 
interest rate swaps, using the derivative obligation as of August 31, 2017 to estimate the fair value of long-term debt, which
includes the effects that the cross-currency interest rate swaps have had on the fair value of long-term debt.

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities – The Company uses derivative financial instruments for hedging and non-
trading purposes to manage its exposure to changes in interest rates and currency exchange rates.  In using derivative financial 
instruments for the purpose of hedging the Company’s exposure to interest rates and currency exchange rate risks, the contractual
terms of a hedged instrument closely mirror those of the hedged item, providing a high degree of risk reduction and correlation.
Contracts  that  are  effective  at  meeting  the  risk  reduction  and  correlation  criteria  (effective  hedge)  are  recorded  using  hedge 
accounting.   If a derivative financial instrument is an effective hedge, changes in the fair value of the instrument will be offset 
in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) until the hedged item completes its contractual term.  If any portion of the 
hedge is deemed ineffective, the change in fair value of the hedged assets or liabilities will be immediately recognized in earnings 
during the period.   Instruments that do not meet the criteria for hedge accounting, or contracts for which the Company has not
elected hedge accounting, are valued at fair value with unrealized gains or losses reported in earnings during the period of the 
change.  The  Company  did  not  change  valuation  techniques  utilized  in  the  fair  value  measurement  of  assets  and  liabilities
presented on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets during the reporting period.  The Company seeks to manage counterparty 
risk associated with these contracts by limiting transactions to counterparties with which the Company has an established banking
relationship. There can be no assurance, however, that this practice effectively mitigates counterparty risk.

r

Cash Flow Instruments.  The Company is a party to receive floating interest rate, pay fixed-rate interest rate swaps to
hedge the interest rate risk of certain U.S. dollar denominated debt within its international subsidiaries. The swaps are designated 
as cash flow hedges of interest expense risk.  These instruments are considered effective hedges and are recorded using hedge 
accounting.   The Company is also a party to receive variable interest rate, pay fixed interest rate cross-currency interest rate
swaps to hedge the interest rate and currency exposure associated with the expected payments of principal and interest of U.S.
denominated  debt  within  its  international  subsidiaries  whose  functional  currency  is  other  than  the  U.S  dollar. The  swaps  are 
ff
designated as cash flow hedges of the currency risk related to payments on the U.S. denominated debt.  These instruments are 
also considered to be effective hedges and are recorded using hedge accounting.  Under cash flow hedging, the effective portion
of the fair value of the derivative, calculated as the net present value of the future cash flows, is deferred on the consolidated 
balance sheets in accumulated other comprehensive loss. If any portion of an interest rate swap is determined to be an ineffective
hedge,  the  gains  or  losses  from  changes  in  fair  value  would  be  recorded  directly  in  the  consolidated  statements  of  income. 
Amounts  recorded  in  accumulated  other  comprehensive  loss  are  released  to  earnings  in  the  same  period  that  the  hedged
transaction impacts consolidated earnings. See Note 12 - Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities for information on the 
fair value of interest rate swaps and cross-currency interest rate swaps as of August 31, 2017 and August 31, 2016.

Fair Value Instruments.  The Company is exposed to foreign-currency exchange rate fluctuations in the normal course 
of business. This includes exposure to foreign-currency exchange rate fluctuations on U.S. dollar-denominated liabilities within
the Company’s international subsidiaries whose functional currency is other than the U.S. dollar.  The Company manages these 
fluctuations, in part, through the use of non-deliverable forward foreign-exchange contracts that are intended to offset changes in 
cash flows attributable to currency exchange movements.  The contracts are intended primarily to economically address exposure 
to U.S. dollar merchandise inventory expenditures made by the Company’s international subsidiaries whose functional currency 
is other than the U.S. dollar. Currently, these contracts are treated for accounting purposes as fair value instruments and do not 
qualify for derivative hedge accounting, and as such the Company does not apply derivative hedge accounting to record these 
transactions. As a result, these contracts are valued at fair value with unrealized gains or losses reported in earnings during the 
period of the change. The Company seeks to mitigate foreign-currency exchange-rate risk with the use of these contracts and 
does not intend to engage in speculative transactions. These contracts do not contain any credit-risk-related contingent features
and are limited to less than one year in duration. See Note 12 - Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities for information on 
the fair value of open, unsettled forward foreign-exchange contracts  as of August 31, 2017 and August 31, 2016.

F-44

  
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) 

The following table summarizes financial assets and liabilities measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring basis
in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of August 31, 2017 and August 31, 2016 (in thousands) for derivatives that qualify
for hedge accounting:

Assets and Liabilities as of August 31, 2017
Other non-current assets – (Cross-currency interest rate 
swaps)
Other long-term liabilities – (Interest rate swaps)
Other long-term liabilities – (Cross-currency interest 
rate swaps)
Total

Assets and Liabilities as of August 31, 2016
Other non-current assets – (Cross-currency interest rate 
swaps)
Other long-term liabilities – (Interest rate swaps)
Other long-term liabilities – (Cross-currency interest 
rate swaps)
Total

Quoted Prices
 in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)

Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)

$

$

 — $
 —

 —
 — $

 2,547
 (231)

 (451)
 1,865

$

$

 — $
 —

 —
 — $

Quoted Prices
 in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)

Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)

$

$

 — $
 —

 —
 — $

 3,224
 (448)

 (1,066)
 1,710

$

$

 — $
 —

 —
 — $

Total

 2,547
 (231)

 (451)
 1,865

Total

 3,224
 (448)

 (1,066)
 1,710

Goodwill – The table below presents goodwill resulting from certain business combinations as of August 31, 2017 and 

August 31, 2016 (in thousands).  The change in goodwill is a result of foreign exchange translation losses.

Goodwill

August 31,
2017

August 31,
2016

Change

$

 35,642

$

 35,637

$

 5

The Company reviews goodwill at the reporting unit for impairment. The Company first reviews qualitative factors for 
each reporting unit in determining if an annual goodwill test is required. If the Company's review of qualitative factors indicates 
a requirement for a test of goodwill impairment, because it is more likely than not that an impairment of goodwill may exist, the
Company then will assess whether the carrying amount of a reporting unit is greater than the estimated fair value. If the carrying 
amount of a reporting unit is greater than zero and its estimated fair value exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting 
rr
g amount 
unit is considered not impaired. If either the carrying amount of the reporting unit is not greater than zero or if the carryin
of  the  entity  exceeds  its  estimated  fair  value,  the  Company  performs  a  second  test  to  determine  whether  goodwill  has  been 
impaired and to calculate the amount of that impairment. The Company was not required to perform the second step for any
reporting units in 2017 or 2016.

f

Revenue  Recognition  –  The  Company  recognizes  merchandise  sales  revenue  when  title  passes  to  the  customer. 
Membership income represents annual membership fees paid by the Company’s warehouse club members, which are recognized 
ratably over the 12-month term of the membership.  Membership refunds are prorated over the remaining term of the membership; 
accordingly, no refund reserve is required to be established for the periods presented.  The Company recognizes and presents 
revenue-producing transactions on a net of value added/sales tax basis. 

The Company began offering Platinum memberships in Costa Rica during fiscal year 2013, which provide members
with a 2% rebate on most items, up to an annual maximum of $500.  Platinum members can apply this rebate to future purchases 
at the warehouse club at the end of the annual membership period.  The Company records this 2% rebate as a reduction of revenue
at the time of the sales transaction.  Accordingly, the Company has reduced warehouse sales and has accrued a liability within 
other  accrued  expenses.  The rebate  is  issued  annually  to  Platinum  members  on  March 1  and  expires August 31.  Any  rebate

F-45

  
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) 

amount  not  redeemed  by August 31  is  recognized  as  breakage  revenue. The  Company  periodically  reviews  expired  unused 
rebates outstanding, and the expired unused rebates are recognized as Revenues: Other income on the consolidated statements of 
income.  The  Company  has  determined  that  breakage  revenue  is  insignificant;  therefore,  it  records  100%  of  the  Platinum 
membership liability at the time of sale, rather than estimating breakage.  In September of fiscal year 2018, we introduced the
Platinum membership in Panama and plan on adding a Platinum membership level in the Dominican Republic in the next few 
months. We are considering expanding Platinum membership to other PriceSmart markets and may do so during fiscal year 2018.

The  Company  recognizes  gift  certificate  sales  revenue  when  the  certificates  are  redeemed.  The  outstanding  gift 
certificates are reflected as other accrued expenses in the consolidated balance sheets. These gift certificates generally have a
one-year  stated  expiration  date  from  the  date  of  issuance.  However,  the  absence  of  a  large  volume  of  transactions  for  gift 
certificates impairs the Company's ability to make a reasonable estimate of the redemption levels for gift certificates; therefore,
the  Company  assumes  a  100%  redemption  rate  prior  to  expiration  of  the  gift  certificate. The  Company  periodically  reviews
unredeemed outstanding gift certificates, and the gift certificates that have expired are recognized as Revenues: Other income on
the consolidated statements of income. 

ff

Operating leases, where the Company is the lessor, with lease payments that have fixed and determinable rent increases
are recognized as revenue on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The Company also accounts in its straight-line computation 
for  the  effect  of  any  "rental  holidays."  Contingent  rental  revenue  is  recognized  as  the  contingent  rent  becomes  due  per  the
individual lease agreements.

Insurance Reimbursements – Receipts from insurance reimbursements up to the amount of the losses recognized are 
considered  recoveries.  These  recoveries  are  accounted  for  when  they  are  probable  of  receipt.  Insurance  recoveries  are  not
recognized  prior  to  the  recognition  of  the  related  cost. Anticipated  proceeds  in  excess  of  the  amount  of  loss  recognized  are 
considered gains and are subject to gain contingency guidance. Anticipated proceeds in excess of a loss recognized in the financial
statements are not recognized until all contingencies related to the insurance claim are resolved.

a

Cost of Goods Sold – The Company includes the cost of merchandise, food service and bakery raw materials, and one 
hour photo supplies in cost of goods sold. The Company also includes in cost of goods sold the external and internal distribution
and handling costs for supplying merchandise, raw materials and supplies to the warehouse clubs. External costs include inbound
freight, duties, drayage, fees, insurance, and non-recoverable value-added tax related to inventory shrink, spoilage and damage.
Internal costs include payroll and related costs, utilities, consumable supplies, repair and maintenance, rent expense and building
and equipment depreciation at the Company's distribution facilities and payroll and other direct costs for in-store demonstrations. 

t

Vendor  consideration  consists  primarily  of  volume  rebates,  time-limited  product  promotions,  slotting  fees,
demonstration reimbursements and prompt payment discounts. Volume rebates that are not threshold based are incorporated into
the unit cost of merchandise reducing the inventory cost and cost of goods sold. Volume rebates that are threshold based are 
recorded as a reduction to cost of goods sold when the Company achieves established purchase levels that are confirmed by the
vendor in writing or upon receipt of funds. On a quarterly basis, the Company calculates the amount of rebates recorded in cost
of goods sold that relates to inventory on hand and this amount is reclassified as a reduction to inventory, if significant.  Product 
promotions are generally linked to coupons that provide for reimbursement to the Company from vendor rebates for the product 
being promoted.  Slotting fees are related to consideration received by the Company  from vendors for preferential "end cap"
placement  of  the  vendor's  products  within  the  warehouse  club.  Demonstration  reimbursements are  related  to  consideration 
received by the Company from vendors for the in store promotion of the vendors' products. The Company records the reduction 
in cost of goods sold on a transactional basis for these programs. Prompt payment discounts are taken in substantially all cases,
and therefore, are applied directly to reduce the acquisition cost of the related inventory, with the resulting effect recorded to cost 
of goods sold when the inventory is sold.

Selling, General and Administrative – Selling, general and administrative costs are comprised primarily of expenses 
associated  with  warehouse  operations. Warehouse  operations  include  the  operating  costs  of  the  Company's  warehouse  clubs,
including  all  payroll  and  related  costs,  utilities,  consumable  supplies,  repair  and  maintenance,  rent  expense,  building  and 
equipment depreciation, and bank and credit card processing fees. Also included in selling, general and administrative expenses
are the payroll and related costs for the Company's U.S. and regional purchasing and management centers.

Pre-Opening Costs – The Company expenses pre-opening costs (the costs of start-up activities, including organization 

costs and rent) as incurred.

Asset  Impairment  Costs  – The  Company  periodically  evaluates  its  long-lived  assets  for  indicators  of  impairment. 
Management's  judgments  are  based  on  market  and  operational  conditions  at  the  time  of  the  evaluation  and  can  include
management's best estimate of future business activity. These periodic evaluations could  cause  management to conclude that 

F-46

  
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) 

impairment factors exist, requiring an adjustment of these assets to their then-current fair value. Future business conditions and/or 
activity could differ materially from the projections made by management causing the need for additional impairment charges.

Contingencies and Litigation – The Company records and reserves for loss contingencies if (a) information available 
prior to issuance of the consolidated financial statements indicates that it is probable that an asset had been impaired or a liability
had been incurred at the date of the consolidated financial statements and (b) the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated.  If 
one or both criteria for accrual are not met, but there is at least a reasonable possibility that a loss will occur, the Company does
not record and reserve for a loss contingency but describes the contingency within a note and provides detail, when possible, of 
the estimated potential loss or range of loss. If an estimate cannot be made, a statement to that effect is made.

Foreign Currency Translation – The assets and liabilities of the Company’s foreign operations are translated to U.S.
dollars when the functional currency in the Company’s international subsidiaries is the local currency and not U.S. dollars. Assets
and  liabilities  of  these  foreign  subsidiaries are  translated  to  U.S.  dollars  at  the  exchange  rate  on  the  balance  sheet  date,  and 
revenue, costs and expenses are translated at average rates of exchange in effect during the period. The corresponding translation
gains and losses are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income or loss.  These adjustments will affect 
net income upon the sale or liquidation of the underlying investment. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in currencies
other than the functional currency of the respective entity (primarily U.S. dollars) are revalued to the functional currency using 
the exchange rate on the balance sheet date. These foreign exchange transaction gains (losses), including transactions recorded
e.
t
involving these monetary assets and liabilities, are recorded as Other income (expense) in the consolidated statements of incom
The following table summarizes the amounts recorded for the twelve month periods ending August 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 (in 
thousands):

Currency gain (loss)

Years Ended August 31,
2016

2015

2017

$

 1,241

$

 (899)

$

 (4,388)

Income Taxes  – The Company accounts  for income taxes using the asset and liability  method. Under the asset and 
liability method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributed to differences between
the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and 
liabilities  are  measured  using  enacted  tax  rates  expected  to  apply  to  taxable  income  in  the  years  in  which  those  temporary
differences and carry-forwards are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change
in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.  A valuation allowance is established when
necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to amounts expected to be realized.

The Company and its subsidiaries are required to file federal and state income tax returns in the United States and various 
other tax returns in foreign jurisdictions. The preparation of these tax returns requires the Company to interpret the applicable tax 
laws and regulations in effect in such jurisdictions, which could affect the amount of tax paid by the Company. The Company, in
consultation  with  its  tax  advisors,  bases  its  tax  returns  on  interpretations  that  are  believed  to  be  reasonable  under  the
circumstances. The tax returns, however, are subject to routine reviews by the various federal, state and foreign taxing authorities 
in the jurisdictions in which the Company or one of its subsidiaries files tax returns. As part of these reviews, a taxing authority
may disagree with respect to the income tax positions taken by the Company (“uncertain tax positions”) and, therefore, require
the Company or one of its subsidiaries to pay additional taxes.

The Company accrues an amount for its estimate of probable additional income tax liability.  In certain cases, the impact 
of an uncertain income tax position on the income tax return must be recognized at the largest amount that is more-likely-than-
not to be sustained upon audit by the relevant tax authority.  An uncertain income tax position will not be recognized if it has less 
than  50%  likelihood  of  being  sustained.  This  requires  significant  judgment,  the  use  of  estimates,  and  the  interpretation  and
application of complex tax laws. When facts and circumstances change, the Company reassesses these probabilities and records 
any changes in the consolidated financial statements as appropriate.  There were no material changes in the Company's uncertain
income tax positions for the periods ended on August 31, 2017 and August 31, 2016. See Note 9 – for income tax details.

ff

The Company has not provided for U.S. deferred taxes on cumulative non-U.S. undistributed earnings as such earnings
are deemed by the Company to be indefinitely reinvested. It is not practicable to determine the U.S. federal income tax liability 
that would be associated with such earnings because of the complexity of the computation.

F-47

PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements – Not Yet Adopted

FASB ASC 815 ASU 2017-12 Derivatives and Hedging - Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities  

The  FASB  has  issued  Accounting  Standards  Update  (ASU)  No.  2017-12,  Derivatives  and  Hedging  (Topic  815): 
Targeted  Improvements  to  Accounting  for  Hedging  Activities,  which  aims  to  improve  the  financial  reporting  of  hedging 
relationships  to  better  portray  the  economic  results  of  an  entity’s  risk  management  activities  in  its  financial  statements.  The
amendments in this ASU better align an entity’s risk management activities and financial reporting for hedging relationships 
through changes to both the designation and measurement guidance for qualifying hedging relationships and the presentation of 
hedge results. To satisfy that objective, the amendments expand and refine hedge accounting for both non-financial and financial 
risk components, and align the recognition and presentation of the effects of the hedging instrument and the hedged item in the
financial statements. 

Additionally, the amendments (1) permit hedge accounting for risk components in hedging relationships involving non-
financial risk and interest rate risk; (2) change the guidance for designating fair value hedges of interest rate risk and for measuring
the change in fair value of the hedged item in fair value hedges of interest rate risk; (3) continue to allow an entity to exclude
option premiums and forward points from the assessment of hedge effectiveness; and (4) permit an entity to exclude the portion 
of the change in fair value of a currency swap that is attributable to a cross-currency basis spread from the assessment of hedge 
effectiveness. The  amendments  in  this ASU  are  effective  for  annual  periods  beginning  after  December  15,  2018  and  interim 
periods within those annual periods. The Company will evaluate the impact adoption of this guidance may have on the Company’s 
consolidated financial statements. 

n

FASB ASC 715 ASU 2017-09 - Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718)—Scope of Modification Accounting 

The FASB has issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2017-09, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 
718):  Scope  of  Modification  Accounting,  which  seeks  to  provide  clarity,  reduce  diversity  in  practice,  and  reduce  cost  and 
complexity when applying the guidance in Topic 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation, regarding a change to the terms or 
conditions of a share-based payment award.  This ASU provides guidance concerning which changes to the terms or conditions
of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting in Topic 718. Specifically, an entity is to 
account for the effects of a modification, unless all of the following are satisfied: (1) the fair value (or calculated value or intrinsic
value, if such an alternative measurement method is used) of the modified award is the same as the fair value (or calculated value
or intrinsic value, if such an alternative measurement method is used) of the original award immediately before the original award
is  modified;  (2)  the  vesting  conditions  of  the  modified  award  are  the  same  as  the  vesting  conditions  of  the  original  award
immediately before the original award is modified; and (3) the classification of the modified award as an equity instrument or as
a liability instrument is the same as the classification of the original award immediately before the original award is modified.
The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within
those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted. The Company will evaluate the impact adoption of this guidance may have on
the Company’s consolidated financial statements.  

ff

FASB ASC 715 ASU 2017-07- Compensation—Retirement Benefits (Topic 715) 
Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost 

—

— Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic 

In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-07, Compensation—Retirement Benefits (Topic 715) — Improving
the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost. This ASU  is designed to improve
t
guidance related to the presentation of defined benefit costs in the income statement. In particular, ASU 2017-07 requires that
an 
employer report the service cost component in the same line item(s) as other compensation costs arising from services rendered
by  the  pertinent  employees  during  the  period. The  amendments in  this  ASU  are  effective  for  annual  periods  beginning  after
December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted. The Company will evaluate the 
impact adoption of this guidance may have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. 

—

n

n

FASB ASC 350 ASU 2017-04- Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment

In January 2017, the FASB issued Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill
Impairment. This ASU simplifies the manner in which an entity is required to test goodwill for impairment by eliminating Step 
2 from the  goodwill impairment test. Under the amendments in this  ASU, an entity should (1) perform its annual or interim 
n
goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, and (2) recognize an impairment 
charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value, with the understanding that the loss
recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. 

F-48

  
 
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) 

Additionally, ASU 2017-04 requires any reporting unit with a zero or negative carrying amount to perform Step 2 of the
goodwill impairment test. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019. The 
Company will evaluate the impact adoption of this guidance may have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. 

FASB ASC 740 ASU 2016-16- Income Taxes (Topic 740)—Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory

—

In  October 2016,  the  FASB  issued  ASU  No.  2016-16,  Income  Taxes  (Topic  740)—Intra-Entity  Transfers  of  Assets
Other Than Inventory. Currently, U.S. GAAP prohibits recognizing current and deferred income tax consequences for an intra-
entity asset transfer until the asset has been sold to an outside party. ASU 2016-16 states that an entity should recognize the
income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs. 

The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods
within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted. The amendments should be applied on a modified retrospective basis 
through a cumulative-effect adjustment directly to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. The Company
will evaluate the impact adoption of this guidance may have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. 

FASB ASC 230 ASU 2016-15- Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230)—Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments 
(a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force)

r

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain 
Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. This ASU addresses stakeholders’ concerns regarding diversity in practice in how certain
cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows under Topic 230, Statement of Cash
Flows, and Other Topics. In particular, ASU No. 2016-15 addresses eight specific cash flow issues in an effort to reduce this 
diversity  in  practice:  (1)  debt  prepayment  or  debt  extinguishment  costs;  (2)  settlement  of  zero-coupon  bonds;  (3)  contingent 
consideration payments made after a business combination; (4) proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims; (5) proceeds
from the settlement of corporate-owned life insurance policies, including bank-owned life insurance policies; (6) distributions
received from equity method investees; (7) beneficial interests in securitization transactions; and (8) separately identifiable cash 
flows and application of the predominance principle. 

The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods 
within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted. The amendments in this ASU should be applied using a retrospective
transition method to each period presented. If it is impracticable to apply the amendments retrospectively for some of the issues, 
the amendments for those issues would be applied prospectively as of the earliest date practicable. The Company will evaluate 
the impact adoption of this guidance may have on the Company's consolidated financial statements. 

FASB ASC 718 ASU 2016-09 - Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based 
Payment Accounting

In March 2016, the FASB issued new guidance on stock compensation intended to simplify accounting for share-based 
payment transactions. The guidance will change accounting for income taxes, forfeitures, and minimum statutory tax 
withholding requirements. The new standard is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after
December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted. The Company plans to adopt this guidance at the beginning of its first 
quarter of fiscal year 2018.  

(cid:120)

(cid:120)

(cid:120)

The Company has evaluated the amendments requiring recognition of excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies
in the income statement and will apply this approach prospectively. Under the treasury method for calculating
earnings per share, the excess tax benefit/deficiencies will no longer be used to determine the diluted net income 
per share.  The Company determined that the adoption of this guidance will not have a material effect on the
result of operations and the calculation of earnings per share.  The Company has used the two-step method for 
the diluted net income per share calculation over the last several years. 
The Company has evaluated the amendments related to the presentation of employee taxes paid on the statement 
of cash flows when an employer withholds shares to meet the minimum statutory withholding requirement and 
will apply this approach retrospectively. The Company determined that the adoption of this guidance will not
have a material effect on the consolidated statements of cash flows.
The Company has evaluated the amendments related to the timing of when excess tax benefits are recognized, 
the effect of minimum statutory withholding requirements, forfeitures, and intrinsic value and will apply this
methodology using a modified retrospective transition method. The Company has elected to eliminate recording
a forfeiture rate on the expense recorded.  The elimination of the forfeiture rate requires recording a cumulative-
effect adjustment by reducing retained earnings and incr
easing Additional Paid in Capital, at the beginning of 
f
the year of adoption, which is September 1, 2017, for the service periods already incurred for unvested shares.  

F-49

PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) 

FASB ASC 842 ASU 2016-02 -Leases (Topic 842): Amendments to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification

In February 2016, the FASB issued guidance codified in ASC 842, Leases, which supersedes the guidance in ASC 840, 
Leases.  ASC 842 will be effective for the Company on September 1, 2019, and the Company expects to apply the transition
practical expedients allowed by the standard.  Note 11 – “Leases” provides details on the Company’s current lease arrangements.  
While the Company continues to evaluate the provisions of ASC 842 to determine how it will be affected, the primary effect will
be to require recording right-of-use assets and corresponding lease obligations for current operating leases.  The Company expects
the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated balance sheets, but not on the consolidated 
statements of income or cash flows.

FASB ASC 330 ASU 2015-11 -Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory

In July 2015, the FASB issued guidance that will require an entity to measure in-scope inventory at the lower of cost 
and net realizable value.  Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably 
predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation. This amendment applies to entities, like the Company, that measure
inventory value using the average cost method.  The amendments in this ASU more closely align the measurement of inventory
in GAAP with the measurement of inventory in International Financial Reporting Standards.

The  amendment  in  this ASU  is  effective  on  a  prospective basis  for  public  entities  for  fiscal  years  beginning  after
December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years.  Early application is permitted as of the beginning of an
interim or annual reporting period.  The Company determined that the adoption of this guidance will not have a material effect 
on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

FASB ASC 606 ASU 2014-09 - Revenue from Contracts with Customers

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued new guidance on the recognition of revenue 
from contracts with customers. The guidance combines the requirements for reporting revenue and requires disclosures sufficient
to  describe  the  nature,  amount,  timing,  and  uncertainty  of  revenue  and  cash  flows  arising  from  these  contracts. Transition  is 
permitted either retrospectively or as a cumulative effect adjustment as of the date of adoption. The new standard is effective for
fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company plans to adopt this guidance
at the beginning of its first quarter of fiscal year 2019. The Company is evaluating the impact of adoption of this guidance on alln
potentially significant revenue transactions that will be impacted by the new standard on the Company's consolidated financial 
statements and related disclosures as a result of adopting this standard.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements Adopted

FASB ASC 230 ASU 2016-18- Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230)—Restricted Cash 

—

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230)—Restricted Cash. This 
ASU addresses the diversity in practice that exists regarding the classification and the presentation of changes in restricted cash 
on the statement of cash flows. 

The amendments in ASU No. 2016-18 require that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the 
total of cash, cash equivalents and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Thus, amounts
generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when 
reconciling the beginning-of-period and the end-of-period total amounts set forth on the statement of cash flows. The amendments
in this ASU are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those fiscal years and 
will be applied using a retrospective transition method to each period presented.   The Company early adopted this ASU as of 
August 31, 2017. The adoption of this ASU impacted the presentation of cash flows with inclusion of restricted cash flows for
each of the presented periods.

mm

f

FASB ASC 740 ASU 2015-17 -Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes

In  November 2015,  the  FASB  issued  amended  guidance  eliminating  the  requirement  for  organizations  to  present
deferred tax liabilities and assets as current and noncurrent in a classified balance sheet.  Instead, organizations will be required
to classify all deferred tax assets and liabilities as noncurrent.

The amendment in this ASU is effective on a prospective or retrospective basis for public entities for fiscal years and 
interim  periods  within  those  annual  periods  beginning  after  December 15,  2016.    Early  adoption  is  allowed.   The  Company

F-50

  
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) 

retrospectively adopted this amended guidance during the second quarter of fiscal year 2016 and now presents all deferred taxes
as either long-term assets or long-term liabilities. The Company’s fiscal year 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K and Quarterly 
Reports on Form 10-Q presented the restatement of quarterly and annual periods for fiscal year 2015 to reflect the impact to the
Consolidated Balance Sheets.  

FASB ASC 350 ASU 2015-05 - Customers Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement

In April 2015, the FASB issued amended guidance about whether a cloud computing arrangement includes a software 
license.  If a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license, then the customer should account for the software license
element of the arrangement consistent with the acquisition of other software licenses.  If a cloud computing arrangement does 
not include a software license, the customer should account for the arrangement as a service contract.  The amendments do not 
change the accounting for a customer’s accounting for service contracts.

The amendments in this ASU are effective for public entities for annual periods, including interim periods within those 
annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2015.  Early adoption was permitted.  An entity was able to adopt the amendments 
either: (1) prospectively to all arrangements entered into or materially modified after the effective date; or (2) retrospectively. 
The Company adopted this amended guidance as of September 1, 2016.  Adoption of this guidance did not generate a change in 
accounting principle, changes in financial statement line items, or the requirement to prospectively or retrospectively adopt a
method of transition.

r

NOTE 3 – PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment are stated at historical cost. The historical cost of acquiring an asset includes the costs incurred
to bring it to the condition and location necessary for its intended use. Depreciation is computed on the straight-line basis over 
the estimated useful lives of the assets. The useful life of fixtures and equipment ranges from three to 15 years and that of c
ertain 
components of building improvements and buildings from 10 to 25 years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter 
of the life of the improvement or the expected term of the lease. In some locations, leasehold improvements are amortized over 
a period longer than the initial lease term where management believes it is reasonably assured that the renewal option in the 
underlying  lease  will  be  exercised  because  an  economic  penalty  may  be  incurred  if  the  option  is  not  exercised. The  sale  or 
purchase of property and equipment is recognized upon legal transfer of property.

m

Property and equipment consist of the following (in thousands):

Land
Building and improvements
Fixtures and equipment
Construction in progress
Total property and equipment, historical cost
Less: accumulated depreciation
Property and equipment, net

Depreciation and amortization expense (in thousands):

August 31,
2017
 161,579
 382,236
 198,147
 40,224
 782,186
 (224,357)
 557,829

$

$

August 31,
2016
 131,896
 305,420
 186,409
 46,861
 670,586
 (197,541)
 473,045

$

$

Years Ended August 31,
2016

2015

2017

Depreciation and amortization expense

$

 46,292

$

 39,794

$

 34,445

The Company capitalizes interest on expenditures for qualifying assets over a period that covers the duration of the 
activities required to get the asset ready for its intended use, provided that expenditures for the asset have been made and interest
cost is being incurred. Interest capitalization continues as long as those activities and the incurrence of interest cost continue. The
amount capitalized in an accounting period is determined by applying the Company’s consolidated capitalization rate (average 
interest rate) to the average amount of accumulated expenditures for the qualifying asset, for each country, during the period. The 
capitalization rates are based on the interest rates applicable to borrowings outstanding during the period.

F-51

  
 
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) 

Total interest capitalized (in thousands):

Total interest capitalized

Total interest capitalized (in thousands):

Interest capitalized

Balance as of

August 31,
2017

August 31,
2016

$

 8,262

$

 7,380

Years Ended August 31,
2016

2015

2017

$

 447

$

 1,082

$

 1,055

A summary of asset disposal activity for fiscal years 2017, 2016 and 2015 is as follows (in thousands):

Fiscal Year 2017
Fiscal Year 2016
Fiscal Year 2015

Historical
Cost

$
$
$

 19,774
 7,578
 11,740

Accumulated
Depreciation
 17,436
$
 6,330
$
 9,367
$

Proceeds from
disposal

Gain/(Loss)
recognized

$
$
$

 377
 86
 368

$
$
$

 (1,961)
 (1,162)
 (2,005)

The  Company  constructed  a  new  warehouse  club  on  land  acquired  in  May  2015  in  Chia,  Colombia  that  opened  in 
September 2016, fiscal year 2017, bringing the total of warehouse clubs operating in Colombia to seven. On December 4, 2015 
the  Company  signed  an  option  to  acquire  two  properties  and  then  swap  them  for  59,353  square  feet  of  land  adjacent  to  the
Company’s San Pedro Sula warehouse club in Honduras.  The parcels of land exchanged are all undeveloped contiguous land 
parcels that make them similar in all respects.  The transaction was completely nonmonetary in nature, and the transaction did 
not generate any gain recognition.  The accounting basis of the new property equals $1.9 million (the net book value of the real
estate exchanged).  The Company exercised this option and completed the swap during May 2016. The Company will use the
acquired  land  to  expand  the  parking  lot  for  the  San  Pedro  Sula  warehouse  club.  In  January  2017,  the  Company  finalized  its 
acquisition of a distribution center in Medley, Miami-Dade County, Florida, for a total purchase price of approximately $46.0 
million. The Company transferred its Miami dry distribution center activities previously located in its leased facilities to this new 
facility.  This was completed during the third quarter of fiscal year 2017.

n

The  Company  also  recorded within  accounts  payable  and  other  accrued  expenses  approximately  $612,000  and  $3.1
million,  respectively,  as  of August 31,  2017  and  $476,000  and  $1.5  million,  respectively,  as  of August 31,  2016  of  liabilities
related to the acquisition and/or construction of property and equipment.

NOTE 4 – EARNINGS PER SHARE

The Company presents basic net income per share using the two-class method. The two-class method is an earnings 
allocation formula that treats  a participating security as having rights to earnings that otherwise would have been available to 
common stockholders and that determines basic net income per share for each class of common stock and participating security
according to dividends declared (or accumulated) and participation rights in undistributed earnings that would have been availablea
to common stockholders.  A participating security is defined as a security that may pa
rticipate in undistributed earnings  with
common stock.  The Company’s capital structure includes securities that participate with common stock on a one-for-one basis 
for distribution of dividends.  These are the restricted stock awards and restricted stock units authorized within the 2013 Equity
Incentive Award Plan.  The Company determines the diluted net income per share by using the more dilutive of the two class-
method or the treasury stock method and by including the basic weighted average of outstanding stock options in the calculation
of diluted net income per share under the two-class method and including all potential common shares assumed issued in the
calculation of diluted net income per share under the treasury stock method.

u

F-52

  
 
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) 

The following table sets forth the computation of net income per share for the twelve months ended August 31, 2017, 

2016 and 2015 (in thousands, except per share amounts):

Net income

Net earnings available to common stockholders
Basic weighted average shares outstanding
Add dilutive effect of stock options (two-class method)
Diluted average shares outstanding
Basic net income per share
Diluted net income per share

NOTE 5 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Dividends

Years Ended August 31,
2016

2015

2017

 90,724
 (1,321)
 89,403
 30,020
 3
 30,023
 2.98
 2.98

$

$

$
$

 88,723
 (1,431)
 87,292
 29,928
 5
 29,933
 2.92
 2.92

$

$

$
$

 89,124
 (1,137)
 87,987
 29,848
 7
 29,855
 2.95
 2.95

$

$

$
$

The following table summarizes the dividends declared and paid during fiscal years 2017, 2016 and 2015. 

First Payment

Second Payment

Declared
2/3/2017
2/3/2016
2/4/2015

Record
Date

Date
Paid

Record
Date

Date
Paid

Amount

Amount
   $  0.70     2/15/2017    2/28/2017   $  0.35     8/15/2017    8/31/2017   $  0.35
   $  0.70     2/15/2016    2/29/2016 $  0.35     8/15/2016    8/31/2016 $  0.35
8/31/2015 $  0.35

2/27/2015 $  0.35

8/14/2015

2/13/2015

Amount

$  0.70

The Company anticipates the ongoing payment of  semi-annual dividends in  subsequent  periods, although the actual
declaration of future dividends, the amount of such dividends, and the establishment of record and payment dates is subject to 
final  determination  by  the  Board  of  Directors  at  its  discretion  after  its  review  of  the  Company’s  financial  performance  and 
anticipated capital requirements.

F-53

  
 
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) 

Comprehensive Income and Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

The  following  table  discloses  the  changes  in  each  component  of  other  comprehensive  income  (loss),  net  of  tax  (in 

thousands):

Foreign
currency
translation
adjustments

Defined
benefit
pension
plans

(Amounts in thousands and net of income taxes)
Balances as of August 31, 2014
Other comprehensive income (loss)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other 
comprehensive income (loss)
Balances as of August 31, 2015
Other comprehensive income (loss)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other 
comprehensive income (loss)
Balances as of August 31, 2016
Other comprehensive income (loss)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other 
comprehensive income (loss)
Balances as of August 31, 2017

$

$

$

$

 (50,410) $
 (50,130)

 —
 (100,540) $
 (1,702)

 —
 (102,242) $
 (6,297)

 —
 (108,539) $

Derivative
Instruments
 1,011
 (1,770)(1)

 (100)(1)(3)
 (859)
 (535)(1)

 — (1)(3)

 (1,394)

 316 (1)

 — (1)(3)

$

$

$

 113
 65

 (291)(2)
 (113)
 (182)

 (20)(2)
 (315)
 (166)

 39 (2)

 (442)

$

 (1,078)

Total

 (49,286)
 (51,835)

 (391)
 (101,512)
 (2,419)

 (20)
 (103,951)
 (6,147)

 39
 (110,059)

$

$

$

$

(1) See Note 12 – “Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.”
(2) Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) related to the  minimum pension liability  are 

included in warehouse club operations in the Company's consolidated statements of income.

(3) Amounts  reclassified  from  accumulated  other  comprehensive  income  (loss)  for  settlement  of  derivative  instruments  are

included in other income (expense), net in the Company's consolidated statements of income.

Retained Earnings Not Available for Distribution

The following table summarizes retained earnings designated as legal reserves of various subsidiaries which cannot be

distributed as dividends to PriceSmart, Inc. according to applicable statutory regulations (in thousands):

Retained earnings not available for distribution

NOTE 6 – POST EMPLOYMENT PLANS

Defined Contribution Plans

August 31,
2017

August 31,
2016

$

 6,459

$

 5,926

PriceSmart  offers  a  defined  contribution  401(k)  retirement  plan  to  its  U.S.  employees,  including  warehouse  club
employees in the U.S. Virgin Islands, which auto-enrolls employees in the plan immediately on the first day of employment.  The
Company makes nondiscretionary contributions to the 401(k) plan with a 4% “Company Contribution” based on the employee’s 
salary regardless of the employee’s own contributions to the plan up to the IRS maximum allowed.  Effective January 1, 2016,
the Company also makes nondiscretionary contributions to the 401(k) plan to the non-officer employees that defer up to 2% of 
their salary.  Employer contributions to the 401(k) plan for the Company's U.S. employees were $1.8 million, $1.7 million and 
$1.3 million during fiscal years 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. 

PriceSmart also offers and/or is implementing defined contribution retirement plans in most of its subsidiaries.  The 
Company makes nondiscretionary contributions to these plans based on the employee’s salary, regardless of the employee’s own 
contributions to the plan,  up to the  maximum allowed.  The expenses associated  with the plans  for the  Company’s  non-U.S. 
employees were $3.1 million, $3.1 million and $1.8 million during fiscal years 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively.  

F-54

  
 
  
 
 
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) 

Defined Benefit Plans

The Company's subsidiaries located in three countries are parties to unfunded post-employment benefit plans, (defined 
benefit plans), in which the subsidiary is required to pay a specified benefit upon retirement, voluntary departure or death of the
employee. The amount of the benefit is predetermined by a formula based on the employee's earnings history, tenure of service 
and age. Because the obligation to provide benefits arises as employees render the services necessary to earn the benefits pursuant
to the terms of the plan, the Company recognizes the cost of providing the benefits over the projected employee service periods.
These payments are only due if an employee reaches certain thresholds, such as tenure and/or age. Therefore, these plans are 
treated as defined benefit plans. For these defined benefit plans, the Company has engaged actuaries to assist with estimating the
current costs associated with these future benefits. The liabilities for these unfunded plans are recorded as non-current liabilities.

f

The following table summarizes the amount of the funding obligation and the line items in which it is recorded on the 
consolidated balance sheets as of August 31, 2017 and 2016 and consolidated statements of income for the fiscal years ended
August 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 (in thousands):

Other Long-Term
Liability

Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Loss

August 31,

2017

2016

2017

2016

Operating Expenses
Year Ended August 31,
2016

2017

2015

Start of period
Service cost
Interest cost
Prior service cost 
(amortization)
Actuarial gains/(losses)

Totals

$

$

 (882) $
 88
 (80)

 (196)
 (1,070) $

 (807) $
 234
 (51)

 —
 (258)
 (882) $

 465 $
 —
 —

 (55)
 240
 650 $

$

 172
 —
 —

 35
 258
 465 (1)   $

 — $
 119
 80

 55
 (45)
 209 $

 — $
 35
 52

 56
 (87)
 56 $

 —
 192
 21

 (232)
 (91)
 (110)

(1) The  Company  has  recorded  a  deferred  tax  (liability)/asset  of  $208,000  and  $150,000  as  of August  31,  2017  and  2016,
respectively, relating to the unrealized expense on defined benefit plans. The Company  also recorded accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, for $(442,000) and $(315,000) as of August 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

The valuation assumptions used to calculate the liability for the defined benefit plans differ based on the country 

where the plan applies. These assumptions are summarized as follows:

Valuation Assumptions:
Discount rate
Future salary escalation
Percentage of employees assumed to withdraw from Company without a benefit 
(“turnover”)
Percentage of employees assumed to withdraw from Company with a benefit 
(“disability”)

Year Ended August 31,

2017

2016

3.5%  to 10.5%
3.0%  to  5.0%

3.5%  to 10.8%
3.0%  to  5.5%

3.9%  to 19.5%

4.0%  to 19.5%

0.5%  to  6.0%

0.5%  to 11.4%

For the fiscal year ending August 31, 2018, the Company expects to recognize, as components of net periodic benefit 

cost, the following amounts currently recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (in thousands):

Prior service cost
Actuarial gain/loss

Expected Recognition 
Year Ended August 31,
2018

$

$

 55
 31
 86

F-55

  
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) 

Other Post-Employment Benefit Plans

Some of the Company’s subsidiaries are parties to funded and unfunded post-employment benefit plans based on services 
that the employees have rendered. These plans require the Company to pay a specified benefit on retirement, voluntary departure
or death of the employee, or monthly payments to an external fund manager. The amount of these payments is predetermined by
a formula based on the employee's earnings history and tenure of service.  Because the obligation to provide benefits arises as
employees render the services necessary to earn the benefits pursuant to the terms of the plan, the cost associated with providing 
the benefits is recognized as the employee provides those services. The employees' rights to receive payment on these plans are
not dependent on their reaching certain thresholds like age or tenure. Therefore, these plans are not treated as defined benefit 
plans. For these post-employment benefit plans, the Company has accrued liabilities that are recorded as accrued salaries and
benefits and other long-term liabilities. The following table summarizes the amounts recorded on the balance sheet and amounts 
aa
expensed on the consolidated statements of income (in thousands):

Accrued Salaries
and Benefits

Other Long-Term
Liability

Restricted Cash
Held (1)

Operating Expenses

2017

2016

2017

Years Ended August 31,
2017

2016

2016

2017

2016

2015

Other Post-
Employment Plans

$

 425 $

 358 $

 2,720 $

 2,395 $  2,493 $  2,188 $  1,017 $  1,026 $  1,722

(1) With  some  locations,  local  statutes  require  the  applicable  Company  subsidiary  to  deposit  cash  in  its  own  name  with 

designated fund managers. The funds earn interest which the Company recognizes as interest income.

NOTE 7 – STOCK BASED COMPENSATION

The three types of equity awards offered by the Company are stock options (“options”), restricted stock awards (“RSAs”) 
and restricted stock units (“RSUs”).  Compensation related to options is accounted for by applying the valuation technique based 
on the Black-Scholes model. Compensation related to RSAs and RSUs is based on the fair market value at the time of grant with
the application of an estimated forfeiture rate.  The Company recognizes the compensation cost related to these awards over the
requisite service period as determined by the grant, amortized ratably or on a straight line basis over the life of the grant.  The 
Company utilizes “modified grant-date accounting” for true-ups due to actual forfeitures at the vesting dates.  The Company
records the tax savings resulting from tax deductions in excess of expense for stock-based compensation as additional paid-in
capital and the tax deficiency resulting from stock-based compensation in excess of the related tax deduction as a reduction in
paid-in capital, based on the Tax Law Ordering method.  In addition, the Company reflects the tax savings (deficiency) resulting 
from the taxation of stock-based compensation as a financing cash flow in its consolidated statement of cash flows, rather than
as operating cash flows.

r

RSAs have the same cash dividend and voting rights as other common stock and are considered to be currently issued
and outstanding shares of common stock.  Shares of common stock subject to RSUs are not issued nor outstanding until vested,
and RSUs do not have the same dividend and voting rights as common stock.  However, all outstanding RSUs have accompanying
dividend equivalents, requiring payment to the employees and directors with unvested RSUs of amounts equal to the dividend 
they would have received had the shares of common stock underlying the RSUs been actually issued and outstanding.  Payments
of dividend equivalents to employees and directors are recorded as compensation expense and as director fees, respectively.

The Company adopted the 2013 Equity Incentive Award Plan (the "2013 Plan") for the benefit of its eligible employees, 
consultants and non-employee directors on January 22, 2013. The 2013 Plan provides for awards covering up to (1)  600,000 
shares of common stock plus (2) the number of shares that remained available for issuance as of January 22, 2013 under three 
equity participation plans previously maintained by the Company. The number of shares reserved for issuance under the 2013 
Plan increases during the term of the plan by the number of shares relating to awards outstanding under the 2013 Plan or any of
the prior plans that expire, or are forfeited, terminated, canceled or repurchased, or are settled in cash in lieu of shares. However,

F-56

  
 
 
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) 

in no event will more than an aggregate of 1,233,897 shares of the Company’s common stock be issued under the 2013 Plan. The 
following table summarizes the shares authorized and shares available for future grants:

f

Shares authorized for issuance as of August 31, 2017
(including shares originally authorized for issuance under prior plans)
 944,905

2013 Plan

Shares available to grant

August 31,
2017
 637,822

August 31,
2016
 615,889

The following table summarizes the components of the stock-based compensation expense for the twelve-month periods
ended August 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 (in thousands), which are included in general and administrative expense and warehouse 
club operations in the consolidated statements of income:

Options granted to directors

Restricted stock units
Stock-based compensation expense

Remaining unrecognized compensation cost (in thousands)
Weighted average period of time over which this cost will be recognized 
r
(years)

Years Ended August 31,
2016

2015

2017

$

$

 18
 7,301
 2,370
 9,689

$

$

 72
 7,103
 1,946
 9,121

$

$

 86
 4,599
 1,284
 5,969

August 31,
2017

Balance as of
August 31,
2016

August 31,
2015

$

 26,382

$

 32,380

$

 18,421

 3

 4

 5

August 31,
2017

Years Ended
August 31,
2016

August 31,
2015

Excess tax benefit (deficiency) on stock-based compensation (in 
thousands)

$

 165

$

 610

$

 1,206

The Company began issuing restricted stock awards in fiscal year 2006 and restricted stock units in fiscal year 2008. 
The restricted stock awards and units vest from a one-year to ten-year period and the unvested portion of the award is forfeited if 
the employee or non-employee director leaves the Company before the vesting period is completed. Restricted stock awards and 
units activity for the twelve-months ended August 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 was as follows:

Grants outstanding at beginning of period

Forfeited
Vested
Grants outstanding at end of period

August 31,
2017
 509,880
 56,724
 (40,023)
 (122,213)
 404,368

Years Ended
August 31,
2016
 366,021
 276,530
 (1,372)
 (131,299)
 509,880

August 31,
2015
 488,416
 36,382
 (10,738)
 (148,039)
 366,021

F-57

PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) 

The following table summarizes the weighted average per share grant date fair value for restricted stock awards and 

units for fiscal years 2017, 2016 and 2015:

Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Restricted stock awards and units granted
Restricted stock awards and units vested
Restricted stock awards and units forfeited

August 31,
2017

Years Ended
August 31,
2016

August 31,
2015

$
$
$

 87.43
 77.85
 77.19

$
$
$

 84.69
 71.19

$
$
 — $

 88.40
 45.20
 65.67

The following table summarizes the total fair market value of restricted stock awards and units vested for the period (in 

thousands):

August 31,
2017

Years Ended
August 31,
2016

August 31,
2015

Total fair market value of restricted stock awards and units vested (in 
thousands)

$

 10,135

$

 10,139

$

 13,192

At the vesting dates of restricted stock awards, the Company repurchases shares at the prior day's closing price per share,
with the funds used to pay the employees' minimum statutory tax withholding requirements.  The Company expects to continue
this practice going forward.  The following table summarizes this activity during the period:

Shares repurchased

August 31,
2017

Years Ended
August 31,
2016

August 31,
2015

 38,634
 3,193

$

 43,171
 3,334

$

 52,396
 4,677

$

The Company reissues treasury shares as part of its stock-based compensation programs.  There have been not been any

reissuances of treasury shares during fiscal years 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.  

Due to the substantial shift from the use of stock options to restricted stock awards and units, the Company believes 

stock option activity is no longer significant and that any further disclosure on options is not necessary.

n

NOTE 8 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Legal Proceedings

From time to time, the Company and its subsidiaries are subject to legal proceedings, claims and litigation arising in the 
ordinary course of business and property ownership.  The Company evaluates such matters on a case by case basis, and vigorously
contests  any  such  legal  proceedings  or  claims  which  the  Company  believes  are  without  merit.   The  Company  establishes  an
accrual for legal proceedings if and when those matters reach a stage where they present loss contingencies that are both probable
and reasonably estimable. In such cases, there may be a possible exposure to loss in excess of any amounts accrued. The Company
monitors those matters for developments that would affect the likelihood of a loss and the accrued amount, if any, thereof, and
adjusts the amount as appropriate. If the loss contingency at issue is not both probable and reasonably estimable, the Company
does not establish an accrual, but will continue to monitor the matter for developments that will make the loss contingency both t
probable  and  reasonably  estimable.  If  it  is  at  least  a  reasonable  possibility  that  a  material  loss  will  occur,  the  Company  will
provide disclosure regarding the contingency.  The Company believes that the final disposition of the pending legal proceedings, 
 is possible,
claims and litigation will not have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations or liquidity. It
however, that the Company's future results of operations for a particular quarter or fiscal year could be impacted by changes in
circumstances relating to such matters.

n

F-58

  
 
 
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) 

Taxes

The Company is required to file federal and state tax returns in the United States and various other tax returns in foreign 
jurisdictions. The preparation of these tax returns requires the Company to interpret the applicable tax laws and regulations in
effect in such jurisdictions, which could affect the amount of tax paid by the Company. The Company, in consultation with its 
tax advisors, bases its tax returns on interpretations that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. The tax returns,
however, are subject to routine reviews by the various taxing authorities in the jurisdictions in which the Company files its returns. 
As part of these reviews, a taxing authority may disagree with respect to the interpretations the Company used to calculate its tax
liability and therefore require the Company to pay additional taxes.

uu

The Company accrues an amount for its estimate of probable additional income tax liability.  In certain cases, the impact
of an uncertain income tax position on the income tax return must be recognized at the largest amount that is more-likely-than-
not to be sustained upon audit by the relevant tax authority.  An uncertain income tax position will not be recognized if it has less 
than 50% likelihood of being sustained (see Note 9 - Income Taxes for additional information). 

t

In evaluating the exposure associated with various non-income tax filing positions, the Company accrues for probable 
and  estimable  exposures  for  non-income  tax  related  tax  contingencies.   As  of  August 31,  2017  and  2016,  the  Company  has
recorded within other accrued expenses a total of $3.4 million and $4.0 million, respectively, for various non-income tax related 
tax contingencies.

While the Company believes the recorded liabilities are adequate, there are inherent limitations in projecting the outcome 
of litigation, in estimating probable additional income tax liability taking into account uncertain tax positions and in evaluating 
the probable additional tax associated with various non-income tax filing positions.  As such, the Company is unable to make a 
reasonable estimate of the sensitivity to change of estimates affecting its recorded liabilities.  As additional information becomes
available, the Company assesses the potential liability and revises its estimates as appropriate. 

Other Commitments

The Company  is  committed  under  non-cancelable  operating  leases for  the  rental  of  facilities  and  land  (see  Note  11 

“Leases”). 

In January 2017, the Company purchased a distribution center in Medley, Miami-Dade County, Florida.  The Company 
transferred its Miami dry distribution center activities that were previously in the leased facility to the new facility during the 
third  quarter  of  fiscal  year  2017.    Some  portions  of  the  vacated  previously  leased  space  were  subleased  (and  subsequently 
returned to the landlord) while the remainder remains available for sublease.  As part of the subleases the Company has agreed 
es 
f
to execute and deliver to the landlord of the leased facility a letter of
 credit (“LOC”) in the amount of $500,000 which entitl
the landlord to draw on the LOC based on a decreasing scale over four years, if certain conditions occur related to nonpayment
by the new tenant.  Although this agreement is considered a guarantee, in measuring the fair value, the Company considers the 
risk and probability of default by the third party tenant as not likely nor probable, based on the Company’s review of the third
party tenant’s financial position as well as the third party’s considerable capital investment into the leased facility.  Therefore,
the Company has not recorded a liability for this guarantee. 

u

f

The  Company  is  also  committed  to  non-cancelable  construction  services  obligations  for  various  warehouse  club 
developments and expansions.  As of August 31, 2017, the Company had approximately $7.9 million in contractual obligations
for construction services not yet rendered.

The Company has entered into land purchase option agreements that have not been recorded as commitments, for which
the Company has recorded within restricted cash and deposits approximately $600,000.  The land purchase option agreements 
can be canceled at the sole option of the Company.  The Company does not have a timetable of when or if it will exercise these 
land purchase options, due to the uncertainty related to the completion of the Company's due diligence reviews. The Company's 
due diligence reviews include evaluations of the legal status of each property, the zoning and permitting issues related to acquiring
approval for the construction and operation of a  warehouse club and any other issues related to the property itself that could 
render  the  property  unsuitable  or  limit  the  property's  economic viability  as  a  warehouse  club  site.  If  the  purchase  option 
agreements are exercised, the cash use would be approximately $20.8 million.

q

f

See Note 14 – “Unconsolidated Affiliates” for a description of additional capital contributions that may be required in 
connection with joint ventures to develop commercial centers adjacent to PriceSmart warehouse clubs in Panama and Costa Rica.

f

F-59

  
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) 

The Company contracts for distribution center services in Mexico.  The contract for this distribution center's services 
expires on August 31, 2020, with the applicable fees and rates to be reviewed at the beginning of each calendar year.  Future 
minimum service commitments related to this contract through the end of the contract term are approximately $456,000.

NOTE 9 – INCOME TAXES

Income from continuing operations before provision for income taxes and loss of unconsolidated affiliates includes the 

following components (in thousands):

United States
Foreign
Income from continuing operations before provision for income taxes
and loss of unconsolidated affiliates

$

$

Years Ended August 31,
2016

2017

 24,773
 107,970

$

 25,533
 105,707

$

2015

 41,694
 94,902

 132,743

$

 131,240

$

 136,596

Significant components of the income tax provision are as follows (in thousands):

Current:
U.S.
Foreign
Total
Deferred:
U.S.
Foreign
Valuation allowance charge
Total
Provision for income taxes

Years Ended August 31,
2016

2017

2015

$

$

$

$
$

 12,185
 32,680
 44,865

$

$

 (2,584) $
 (1,750)
 1,487
 (2,847) $
$
 42,018

 9,269
 30,705
 39,974

 832
 (82)
 2,125
 2,875
 42,849

$

$

$

$
$

 10,918
 33,676
 44,594

 3,941
 (3,100)
 2,131
 2,972
 47,566

The reconciliation of income tax computed at the Federal statutory tax rate to the provision for income taxes is as follows 

(in percentages):

Federal tax provision at statutory rates
State taxes, net of federal benefit
Differences in foreign tax rates
Permanent items and other adjustments
Increase in foreign valuation allowance
Provision for income taxes

Years Ended August 31,
2016
 35.0 %

2017
 35.0 %

2015
 35.0 %

 0.3
 (5.2)
 1.5
 0.1

 0.2
 (5.6)
 2.0
 1.0

 0.4
 (4.2)
 2.3
 1.3

 31.7 %

 32.6 %

 34.8 %

F-60

  
 
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) 

Significant  components  of  the  Company’s  deferred  tax  assets  as  of August 31,  2017  and  2016  are  shown  below  (in

thousands):

Deferred tax assets:
U.S. net operating loss carryforward
Foreign tax credits
Deferred compensation
U.S. timing differences and alternative minimum tax credits
Foreign net operating losses
Foreign timing differences:

Depreciation and amortization
Deferred income
Gross deferred tax assets
U.S. deferred tax liabilities (depreciation and other timing differences)
Foreign deferred tax liabilities netted against deferred tax assets
U.S. valuation allowance
Foreign valuation allowance
Net deferred tax assets

August 31,

2017

2016

$

$

 1,684
 3,794
 1,633
 3,042
 10,247

 3,871
 9,514
 4,037
 37,822
 (3,646)
 (4,744)
 (488)
 (13,532)
 15,412

$

$

 3,226
 185
 1,706
 2,846
 13,414

 3,807
 8,923
 3,606
 37,713
 (3,944)
 (8,848)
 (652)
 (12,011)
 12,258

As of August 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had net deferred tax liabilities of $1.8 million at the end of each period,

arising from timing differences in certain subsidiaries.

For  fiscal  year  2017,  the  effective  tax  rate  was  31.7%.  The  decrease  in  the  effective  rate  versus  the  prior  year  was 

primarily attributable to the following factors:

(i)  Decrease  in  fiscal  year  2017  in  the  magnitude  of  an intercompany  transaction  between  PriceSmart,  Inc.  and  our 
Colombian subsidiary in support of PriceSmart’s ongoing market development and growth in Colombia compared to fiscal year
2016. Reduction to this intercompany transaction, year over year, resulted in a comparatively unfavorable impact on the effective 
tax rate of 0.9% due to less reductions to taxable income in the U.S. and less reciprocal increase in taxable income in our Colombia 
subsidiary in fiscal  year 2017 compared to fiscal  year 2016. This income did not  generate income tax expense in  Colombia,
because the additional taxable income in Colombia was fully offset by the reversal of valuation allowances on accumulated net
losses in that subsidiary. The Company expects the decrease of the favorable impact to the consolidated Company’s effective tax 
rate over the next several quarters to continue; 

(ii)  The comparably favorable impact of 1.4% resulting from improved financial results in the Company’s Colombia

subsidiary for which no tax benefit was recognized, net of adjustment to valuation allowance and; 

(iii) The favorable impact of 1.3% due predominantly to the non-recurrence of the impact from setting up a valuation 

allowance against the deferred tax assets of the Company’s Barbados subsidiary in the prior year.

For fiscal year 2017, management concluded that a valuation allowance continues to be necessary for certain U.S. and
foreign  deferred  tax  assets,  primarily  because  of  the  existence  of  negative  objective  evidence,  such  as  the  fact  that  certain 
subsidiaries  are  in  a  cumulative  loss  position  for  the  past  three  years,  and  the  determination  that  certain  net  operating  loss
carryforward  periods  are  not  sufficient  to  realize  the  related  deferred  tax  assets. The  Company  factored  into  its  analysis  the 
inherent  risk  of  forecasting  revenue  and  expenses  over  an extended  period  of  time  and  also  considered  the  potential  risks
associated with its business. Additionally, while the Company continues to forecast profitability for its Barbados subsidiary for 
the immediate and foreseeable future, in fiscal year 2016, due to the existence of negative objective evidence from recent years,
the Company established a valuation allowance of approximately $2.0 million to reduce deferred tax assets to amounts expected
to be realized. The Company had net foreign deferred tax assets of $9.4 million and $8.9 million as of August
31, 2017 and 2016, 
respectively.

ff

f

The Company had U.S. federal and state tax NOLs at August 31, 2017 of approximately $3.4 million and $5.5 million,
respectively. The federal and state NOLs generally expire  during periods ranging from  2017 through 2027, unless previously
utilized. In calculating the tax provision and assessing the likelihood that the Company will be able to utilize the deferred tax

F-61

  
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) 

assets, the Company considered and weighed all of the evidence, both positive and negative, and both objective and subjective. 
The Company factored in the inherent risk of forecasting revenue and expenses over an extended period of time and considered
the potential risks associated with its business. Using the Company's U.S. income from continuing operations and projections of
future taxable income in the U.S., the Company was able to determine that there was sufficient positive evidence to support the
conclusion  that  it  was  more  likely  than  not  that  the  Company  would  be  able  to  realize  substantially  all  of  its  U.S.  NOLs  by
generating sufficient taxable income during the carry-forward period. However, the Company maintains a valuation allowance 
on substantially all of its state NOLs due to the adoption of single sales factor apportionment in California, which significantly
reduces taxable income in that state.

The  Company  has  determined  that  due  to  a  deemed  change  of  ownership  (as  defined  in  Section 382  of  the  Internal
Revenue Code) in October 2004, there will be annual limitations in the amount of U.S. taxable income of approximately  $3.5 
million that may be offset by NOLs. The Company does not believe this will impact the recoverability of these NOLs. 

The  Company  does  not  provide  for  income  taxes  which  would  be  payable  if  undistributed  earnings  of  its  foreign 
subsidiaries  were  remitted  to  the  U.S.,  because  the  Company considers  these  earnings  to  be  permanently  reinvested  as 
management has no plans to repatriate undistributed earnings and profits of foreign affiliates. As of August 31, 2017 and 2016,
the undistributed earnings of these foreign subsidiaries are approximately $544.6 million and $472.5 million, respectively. Upon 
distribution of those earnings in the form of dividends or otherwise, the Company would be subject to both U.S. income taxes 
and  withholding  taxes  payable  to  the  foreign  countries,  but  would  also  be  able  to  offset  unrecognized  foreign  tax 
credits.   Determination  of  the  amount  of  unrecognized  deferred  U.S.  income  tax  liability  is  not  practicable  because  of  the 
complexities associated with its hypothetical calculation.

The Company accrues for the estimated additional amount of taxes for uncertain income tax positions if the likelihood

of sustaining the tax position does not meet the more-likely-than-not-standard for recognition of tax benefits.

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows (in thousands):

Balance at beginning of fiscal year
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year
Settlements
Expiration of the statute of limitations for the assessment of taxes
Balance at end of fiscal year

Years Ended August 31,
2016

2017

2015

$

$

 7,754
 36
 (65)
 (31)
 7,694

$

$

 8,159
 —
 —
 (405)
 7,754

$

$

 8,786
 —
 —
 (627)
 8,159

As of August 31, 2017, the liability for income taxes associated with uncertain tax benefits was $7.7 million and can be
reduced by $7.0 million of tax benefits associated with timing adjustments that are recorded as deferred tax assets and liabilities.
The net amount of $700,000, if recognized, would favorably affect the Company's financial statements and favorably affect the
Company's effective income tax rate.

The Company expects changes in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits in the next 12 months as the result of a lapse 
in various statutes of limitations. The lapse of statutes of limitations in the twelve-month period ending August 31, 2018 could 
result in a total income tax benefit amounting up to $26,000.

The Company recognizes interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense. As of August 31,
2017 and 2016, the Company had accrued $214,000 and $370,000, respectively, for the payment of interest and penalties (before
income tax benefit). 

The Company has various appeals pending before tax courts in its subsidiaries' jurisdictions.  Any possible settlement
could increase or decrease earnings but is not expected to be significant. Audit outcomes and the timing of audit settlements are
subject  to  significant  uncertainty. One  of  the  Company’s  subsidiaries  received  assessments  claiming $2.6  million  of  taxes, 
penalties and interest related to  withholding taxes on certain charges  for services rendered by the Company. In addition, this 
subsidiary received assessments totaling $5.3 million for lack of deductibility of the underlying service charges due to the lack 
of withholding.  Based on a review of the Company's tax advisers' interpretation of local law, rulings and jurisprudence (including 
Supreme Court precedents with respect to the deductibility assessment), the Company expects to prevail in both instances and
has not recorded a provision for these assessments. However, the Company had to submit these amounts as advanced payments
to the government while it appeals.   

F-62

  
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) 

In another country in which the Company has warehouse clubs, beginning in fiscal year 2015, a new minimum income 
tax mechanism took effect, which requires the Company to pay taxes based on a percentage of sales rather than income.  As a 
result, the Company is making income tax payments substantially in excess of those it would expect to pay based on taxable
income.  The current rules (which the Company has challenged in court) do not clearly allow the Company to obtain a refund or 
to offset this excess income tax against other taxes.  As of August 31, 2017, the Company had deferred tax assets of approximately
$2.0 million in this country.  Also, the Company had an income tax receivable balance of  $4.3 million as of August 31, 2017
related  to  excess  payments  from  fiscal  years  2015  and  2017.    The  Company  has  not  placed  any  type  of  allowance  on  the
recoverability of these tax receivables or deferred tax assets, because the Company believes that it is more likely than not that it 
will succeed in its refund request and/or court challenge on this matter. 

The Company and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state and foreign
jurisdictions. The Company is generally no longer subject to income tax examinations by tax authorities in its major jurisdictions 
except for the fiscal years subject to audit as set forth in the table below: 

Tax Jurisdiction
U.S. federal
California (U.S.) (state return)
Florida(U.S.) (state return)
Aruba
Barbados
Costa Rica
Colombia
Dominican Republic
El Salvador
Guatemala
Honduras
Jamaica
Mexico
Nicaragua
Panama
Trinidad
U.S. Virgin Islands
Spain

Fiscal Years Subject to Audit
2000 to 2005, 2007, 2014 to the present
2005 and 2013 to the present
2014 to the present
2012 to the present
2011 to the present
2011 to the present
2012 and 2014 to the present
2011 to 2012 and 2014 to the present
2009 to 2010 and 2014 to the present
2009, 2012 to the present
2012 to the present
2011 to the present
2012 to the present
2013 to the present
2014 to the present
2011 to the present
2001 to the present
2013 to the present

Generally for U.S. federal and U.S. Virgin Islands tax reporting purposes, the statute of limitations is three  years from 
the date of filing of the income tax return.  If and to the extent the tax year resulted in a taxable loss, the statute is extended to 
three years from the filing date of the income tax return in which the carryforward tax loss was used to offset taxable income in
the carryforward year.  Given the historical losses in these jurisdictions and the Section 382 change in control limitations on the
 audit.
ff
use of the tax loss carryforwards, there is uncertainty and significant variation as to when a tax year is no longer subject to

NOTE 10 – DEBT

Short-term borrowings consist of lines of credit which are secured by certain assets of the Company and its subsidiaries,
which, in some cases, are guaranteed by the Company. The following table summarizes the balances of total facilities, facilities
used and facilities available (in thousands):

Total Amount
of Facilities

Short-term
Borrowings

Letters of
Credit

Facilities
Available

Weighted average
interest rate

August 31, 2017
August 31, 2016

$
$

 69,000
 65,000

$
$

 — $
$

 16,534

 966
 9,224

$
$

 68,034
 39,242

 — %
 10.1 %

Facilities Used

As of August 31, 2017 and August 31, 2016, the Company had approximately $40.0 million of short-term facilities in 
the U.S. that require compliance with certain quarterly financial covenants.  As of August 31, 2017 and August 31, 2016, the
Company was in compliance with respect to these covenants.  Each of the facilities expires annually and is normally renewed.

F-63

  
  
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) 

The following table provides the changes in long-term debt for the twelve months ended August 31, 2017:

(Amounts in thousands)
Balances as of August 31, 2016

 incurred during the period:

MUFG Union Bank
Trinidad subsidiary
Repayments of long-term debt:
Repayment of loan by Panama subsidiary
Regularly scheduled loan payments
Translation adjustments on foreign-currency debt of subsidiaries
whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar (2)
Balances as of August 31, 2017

Current
portion of
long-
term debt

Long-term
debt (net of 
current
portion)

Total

$

 14,565

$

 73,542

$

 88,107 (1)

 —
 6,000

 (2,000)
 (225)

 35,700
 6,000

 (11,333)
 (15,837)

 35,700
 12,000

 (13,333)
 (16,062)

 18
 18,358

$

$

 (133)
 87,939

$

 (115)
 106,297 (3)

(1) The carrying amount on  non-cash assets assigned as collateral for these loans  was  $102.4 million.   No cash assets  were 

assigned as collateral for these loans.

(2) These foreign currency translation adjustments are recorded within Other comprehensive income.
(3) The carrying amount on  non-cash assets assigned as collateral for these loans  was  $128.4 million.   No cash assets  were 

assigned as collateral for these loans as of August 31, 2017.

In August 2017, the Company’s Panama subsidiary paid off the outstanding principal balance of U.S. $13.3 million on
a loan agreement entered into with Scotiabank. The Company’s subsidiary also settled the interest rate swap that it had entered
into with Scotiabank related to this loan.

d

On March 31, 2017, the Company's Trinidad subsidiary entered into a loan agreement with Citibank, N.A. The agreement 
provides for a $12.0 million loan to be repaid in eight quarterly principal payments plus interest. The interest rate is set at the 90
day LIBOR rate plus 3%. The loan was funded on March 31, 2017.

In January 2017, the Company finalized its acquisition of a distribution center in Medley, Miami-Dade County, Florida
for  a  total  purchase  price  of  approximately  $46.0  million.  The  Company  transferred  its  Miami  distribution  center  activities 
previously located in leased facilities to the new distribution center during the third quarter of fiscal year 2017. To finance the
r
acquisition of this property, the Company entered into a 10-year real estate secured loan with MUFG Union Bank, N.A. (“Union 
Bank”)  for  $35.7  million  in  January  2017. This  loan  has  a  variable  interest  rate  of  30-day  LIBOR  plus  1.7%,  with  monthly
principal and interest payments maturing in 2027. The monthly principal and interest payments begin in April 2019. The Company 
also entered into an interest rate hedge with Union Bank for $35.7 million, the notional amount. Under the hedge, the Company 
will receive variable interest equal to 30-day LIBOR plus 1.7% and pay fixed interest at a rate of 3.65%, with an effective date
of March 1, 2017 and maturity date of March 1, 2027.

F-64

  
 
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) 

The following table provides a summary of the long-term loans entered into by the Company: 

Loans entered into by the Company's subsidiaries with a balloon payment due at the end of 
the loan term and with non-cash assets assigned as collateral and with/without established
debt covenants
Loans entered into by the Company's subsidiaries for which the subsidiary has entered into
an interest rate swap with non-cash assets assigned as collateral and with/without 
established debt covenants
Loans entered into by the Company's subsidiaries with non-cash assets assigned as 
collateral and with/without established debt covenants
Loans entered into by the Company's subsidiaries for which the subsidiary has entered into 
a cross-currency interest rate swap with non-cash assets assigned as collateral and 
with/without established debt covenants
Total long-term debt
Less: current portion
Long-term debt, net of current portion

August 31,
2017

August 31,
2016

$

 18,200

$

 21,945

 49,424

 17,585

 21,088
 106,297
 18,358
 87,939

$

$

 32,258

 9,717

 24,187
 88,107
 14,565
 73,542

As  of August 31,  2017,  the  Company  had  approximately  $85.6  million  of  long-term  loans  in  Trinidad,  Panama,  El
Salvador, Honduras, Costa Rica, Barbados and Colombia that require these subsidiaries to comply with certain annual or quarterly
financial covenants, which include debt service and leverage ratios.  As of August 31, 2017, the Company was in compliance
with all covenants or amended covenants.

As  of August 31,  2016,  the  Company  had  approximately  $76.0  million  of  long-term  loans  in  Trinidad,  Panama,  El
Salvador,  Honduras,  Costa  Rica,  Barbados,  and  Colombia  that  require  these  subsidiaries  to  comply  with  certain  annual  or 
quarterly  financial  covenants,  which  include  debt  service  and  leverage  ratios.   As  of August 31,  2016,  the  Company  was  in
compliance with all covenants or amended covenants.

Annual maturities of long-term debt are as follows (in thousands):

t

Years Ended August 31,
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Thereafter
Total

Amount

 18,358
 16,279
 18,127
 17,941
 2,966
 32,626
 106,297

$

$

F-65

  
 
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) 

NOTE 11 – LEASES

The Company is committed under non-cancelable operating leases for the rental of facilities and land. These leases expire

or become subject to renewal between December 31, 2017 and January 29, 2044.

As of August 31, 2017, the Company’s warehouse clubs occupied a total of approximately 2,925,731 square feet of which 
522,131 square feet were on leased property. The following is a summary of the warehouse clubs and Company facilities located 
on leased property:

Facility Type

Location
Warehouse Club
Salitre, Colombia
Warehouse Club
Via Brazil, Panama
Miraflores, Guatemala Warehouse Club
Pradera, Guatemala 
Warehouse Club
Tegucigalpa, Honduras Warehouse Club
Oranjestad, Aruba
Warehouse Club
Port of Spain, Trinidad Warehouse Club
Warehouse Club
St. Thomas, U.S.V.I.
Storage Facility
Barbados
Employee Parking
Chaguanas, Trinidad
Container Parking
Chaguanas, Trinidad
Storage and
Distribution Facility

Jamaica

Date Opened
October 29, 2014
December 4, 1997
April 8, 1999
May 29, 2001
May 31, 2000
March 23, 2001
December 5, 2001
May 4, 2001
December 1, 2012
May 1, 2009
April 1, 2010

Approximate
Square
Footage

Current Lease
Expiration Date

 98,566
January 29, 2044
 68,696 October 31, 2026
 68,977 December 31, 2020
 48,438 May 28, 2021
 64,735 May 30, 2020
 64,627 March 23, 2021
 54,046
 54,046
 12,517 November 30, 2025

July 5, 2031
February 28, 2020

 4,944 April 30, 2024
 65,340 March 31, 2025

Remaining
Option(s)
to Extend
20 years
10 years
5 years
none
none
10 years
none
10 years
3 years
none
none

September 1, 2012

17,000

July 14, 2019

2 years

Santo Domingo,
Dominican Republic
Bogota, Colombia
San Diego, CA (1)
Miami, FL(2)
Miami, FL
Panama

Costa Rica

Costa Rica (3)

Panama

Trinidad(4)

Central Offices

June 1, 2010

2,002

January 14, 2021

5 years

October 21, 2010
Central Offices
Corporate Headquarters
April 1, 2004
Dry Distribution Facility March 1, 2008
Cold Distribution Facility August 1, 2016
Central Offices
Storage and
Distribution Facility
Distribution Facility and 
Parking Lot
Distribution Facility  
Storage and
Distribution Facility

January 28, 2013

August 18, 2014

August 14, 2017

March 26, 2018

November 4, 2014

 9,707 December 31, 2017

 45,826 May 31, 2026
July 31, 2021

 206,041
 100,295 December 31, 2027
 17,975 December 12, 2028

none
5 years
none
none
15 years

37,674

January 27, 2019

3 years

233,794 March 25, 2038

10 years

 4,874 August 13, 2020

2 years

17,110 August 17, 2017

none

(2)

(1) On October 31, 2016, the contract to sub-lease 2,799 square feet of space to a third party expired.  The Company has since
occupied all 2,799 square feet of space as an expansion to its Corporate Headquarters and included the additional square feet 
in the table above.
In  January  2017,  the  Company  purchased  a  distribution  center  in  Medley,  Miami-Dade  County,  Florida.   The  Company 
transferred its Miami dry distribution center activities that were previously in the leased facility to the new facility during
the third quarter of fiscal year 2017.  Some portions of the vacated space were subleased (and subsequently returned to the 
landlord) while the remainder remains available for sublease.
In June 2017, the Company executed a contract to acquire 233,794 square feet of space for a regional distribution center and 
parking lot. Delivery date is expected to be March 26, 2018 and June 26, 2018, respectively. 

(3)

t

(4) Although the Company’s lease agreement for the Trinidad storage and distribution facility expired on August 17, 2017, the 
Company continues to occupy the space as an agreement for a one-year renewal has been reached with the landlord, pending 
execution of the contract.  The Company has also included this one-year lease as part of the minimum lease commitments.     

F-66

  
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) 

The following table summarizes the components of rental expense charged for operating leases of open locations for 

fiscal years 2017, 2016 and 2015 (in thousands):

Minimum rental payments

Total straight line rent expense
Contingent rental payments
Common area maintenance expense
Rental expense

Years Ended August 31,

2017

2016

2015

 11,223
 (80)
 11,143
 3,320
 1,174
 15,637

$

$

 9,986
 1,363
 11,349
 3,208
 1,369
 15,926

$

$

 10,074
 1,355
 11,429
 3,137
 1,321
 15,887

$

$

Future minimum lease commitments for facilities under these leases with an initial term in excess of  one year are as 

follows (in thousands):

Years Ended August 31,

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

Thereafter

Total

$

Leased

Locations(1)

 11,596

 11,715

 11,093

 9,615

 8,894

 116,066

$

 168,979 (2)(3)

(1) Operating lease obligations have been reduced by approximately $928,000 to reflect sub-lease income. Certain obligations

under leasing arrangements are collateralized by the underlying asset being leased.

(2) As of August 31, 2016, total future minimum lease commitments were $120.9 million.  The increase during fiscal year 2017 
is primarily related to the extension of an existing lease within the Company’s Guatemala subsidiary for its Pradera location.
The  subsidiary  signed  an  extension  on  November  25,  2016,  extending  the  lease  termination  date  from  May  31,  2021  to
November 30, 2043. The lease extension included the real property at this location currently used by the Company and added 
additional  square  footage  in  the  same  shopping  center  to  the  lease.  This  has  effectively  provided  the  Company  with 
possession of substantially all of the real property available at that location. The Company plans to expand and upgrade the 
current warehouse club and parking areas and to improve access into and out from the location.

(3) Future minimum lease payments include $3.2 million of lease payment obligations for the prior leased Miami distribution 
center.  For the purposes of calculating the minimum lease payments, no reduction was considered for the potential sub-lease
income  the  Company  could  receive  during  the  remaining  lease  term.    This  potential  sub-lease  income  was  considered, 
however, for the purposes of calculating the exit obligation of $57,000 recorded on the balance sheet as of August 31, 2017.  
Projected income for any executed sub-leases would be used to reduce the amount reported as minimum lease payments. 

The following table summarizes the components of rental income recorded for operating leases for fiscal years  2017, 

2016 and 2015 (in thousands): 

Minimum rental receipts
Deferred rent accruals
Total straight line rent income
Contingent rental receipts
Common maintenance area income
Rental income

Years Ended August 31,
2016

2017

2015

 2,654
 (17)
 2,637
 121
 141
 2,899

$

$

 2,735
 56
 2,791
 112
 151
 3,054

$

$

 2,873
 47
 2,920
 86
 148
 3,154

$

$

F-67

PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) 

f
The Company is the landlord for rental of land and/or building space for propertie

s it owns. The following is a schedule 
of  future  minimum  rental  income  on  non-cancelable  operating  leases  with  an  initial  term  in  excess  of  one  year  from  owned 
property as of August 31, 2017 (in thousands):

Years Ended August 31,
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Thereafter
Total

Amount

 2,427
 2,103
 1,835
 1,562
 941
 4,407
 13,275

$

$

NOTE 12 – DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES

The  Company  is  exposed  to  interest  rate  risk  relating  to  its  ongoing  business  operations.  To  manage  interest  rate 
exposure, the Company enters into hedge transactions (interest rate swaps) using derivative financial instruments.  The objective 
of entering into interest rate swaps is to eliminate the variability of cash flows in the LIBOR interest payments associated with 
variable-rate loans over the life of the loans.  As changes in interest rates impact the future cash flow of interest payments, the 
hedges provide a synthetic offset to interest rate movements.

In addition, the Company is exposed to foreign currency and interest rate cash flow exposure related to a non-functional
currency long-term debt held by various of its wholly owned subsidiaries. To manage this foreign currency and interest rate cas
h 
u
flow exposures, the Company’s subsidiaries enter into cross-currency interest rate swaps that convert its U.S. dollar denominated 
floating interest payments to functional currency fixed interest payments during the life of the hedging instrument.  As changes
in foreign exchange and interest rates impact the future cash flow of interest paymen
ts, the hedge is intended to offset changes in
cash flows attributable to interest rate and foreign exchange movements.

t

These derivative instruments (cash flow hedging instruments) are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, with the 
effective  portion  of  the  gain  or  loss  on  the  derivative  reported  as  a  component  of  other  comprehensive  income  (loss)  and
reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction is determined to be ineffective.  There
were no such amounts recorded for ineffectiveness for the periods reported herein related to the interest rate or cross-currency
interest rate swaps of long-term debt.

The Company is exposed to foreign-currency exchange-rate fluctuations in the normal course of business, including
foreign-currency  exchange-rate  fluctuations  on  U.S.  dollar  denominated  liabilities  within  its  international  subsidiaries  whose
functional currency is other than the U.S. dollar.  The Company  manages these fluctuations, in part, through the use of non-
deliverable forward foreign-exchange contracts that are intended to offset changes in cash flow attributable to currency exchange 
movements.   These  contracts  are  intended  primarily  to  economically  address  exposure  to  U.S.  dollar  merchandise  inventory
expenditures made by the Company’s international subsidiaries whose functional currency is other than the U.S. dollar. Currently, 
these contracts do not qualify for derivative hedge accounting. The Company seeks to mitigate foreign-currency exchange-rate 
risk with the use of these contracts and does not intend to engage in speculative transactions. These contracts do not contain any
credit-risk-related contingent features.

Cash Flow Hedges

As of August 31, 2017, all of the Company’s interest rate swap and cross-currency interest rate swap derivative financial
instruments are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges. The Company formally documents the hedging relationships for its 
derivative instruments that qualify for hedge accounting.

F-68

  
  
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) 

The  following  table  summarizes  agreements  for  which  the  Company  has  recorded  cash  flow  hedge  accounting 

transactions during the twelve months ended August 31, 2017:

Subsidiary 
PriceSmart, Inc 

Date
Entered 
into
7-Nov-16

Costa Rica

28-Aug-15

Derivative
Financial 
Counter-
party
MUFG Union 
Bank, N.A. 
("Union 
Bank")
Citibank, N.A.
("Citi")

Honduras 

24-Mar-15  Citibank, N.A.

El Salvador

16-Dec-14

Colombia 

10-Dec-14

Panama

9-Dec-14 

Honduras 

23-Oct-14 

("Citi")

Bank of Nova
Scotia 
("Scotiabank")
Citibank, N.A.
("Citi")

Bank of Nova
Scotia 
("Scotiabank")
Citibank, N.A.
("Citi")

Derivative
Financial 
Instruments 

Interest rate 
swap

Cross currency 
interest rate 
swap

Cross currency 
interest rate 
swap

Interest rate 
swap

Cross currency 
interest rate 
swap
Interest rate 
swap

Cross currency 
interest rate 
swap

Panama

Panama

Panama

1-Aug-14

Bank of Nova
Scotia 
("Scotiabank")
22-May-14  Bank of Nova

Scotia 
("Scotiabank")
22-May-14  Bank of Nova

Scotia 
("Scotiabank")

Interest rate 
swap

Interest rate 
swap

Interest rate 
swap

Initial
US$
Notional 
Amount

Bank 
US$
loan 
Held
with 

 35,700,000  Union 

Bank

 7,500,000  Citibank,

N.A.

 8,500,000  Citibank,

N.A.

 4,000,000  Bank of 

Nova 
Scotia 

 15,000,000  Citibank,

N.A.

 10,000,000  Bank of 

Nova 
Scotia 

 5,000,000  Citibank,

N.A.

 5,000,000  Bank of 

Nova 
Scotia 

 19,800,000  Bank of 

Nova 
Scotia 

 3,970,000  Bank of 

Nova
Scotia 

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

$

Floating Leg 
(swap
counter-
party)
Variable rate
1-month Libor 
plus 1.7%

Variable rate
3-month Libor 
plus 2.50%

Variable rate
3-month Libor 
plus 3.25%

Variable rate
30-day Libor 
plus 3.5%
Variable rate
3-month Libor 
plus 2.8%
Variable rate
30-day Libor 
plus 3.5%
Variable rate
3-month Libor 
plus 3.5%

Variable rate
30-day Libor 
plus 3.5%
Variable rate
30-day Libor 
plus 3.5%
Variable rate
30-day Libor 
plus 3.5%

Fixed Rate
for PSMT
Subsidiary

Settlement 
Dates 

 3.65  % 1st day of each month 
beginning on April 1,
2017 

 7.65  % 28th day of August, 

November, February, 
and May beginning on 
November 30, 2015 

 10.75 % 24th day of March,

June, September, and 
December beginning
on June 24, 2015

 4.78  %  29th day of each month 
beginning  on 
December 29, 2014

 8.25  %  4th day of March, June,

Sept, Dec. beginning
on March 4, 2015 

 5.16  %  28th day of each month 

beginning 
December 29, 2014

 11.6  %  22nd day of January, 

April, July, and 
October beginning on 
January 22, 2015

Effective
Period of swap

March 1, 2017 -
March 1, 2027

August 28, 2015 -
August 28, 2020

March 24,2015 - 
March 20, 2020

December 1, 2014 - 
August 29, 2019

December 4, 2014 - 
December 3, 2019

November 28, 2014 
-
November 29, 2019
October 22, 2014 -
October 22, 2017

 4.89  %  21st day of each month 
beginning on 
September 22, 2014 

 4.98  %  4th day of each month 

beginning on June 4,
2014 

 4.98  % 4th day of each month 

beginning on June 4,
2014 

August 21, 2014 -
August 21, 2019

Settled on 
August 31, 2017

May 5, 2014 - 
April 4, 2019 

For the twelve-month periods ended August 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the Company included the gain or loss on the 
hedged items (that is, variable-rate borrowings) in the same line item—interest expense—as the offsetting gain or loss on the 
related interest rate swaps as follows (in thousands):

Income Statement Classification
Interest expense for the year ended August 31, 2017
31, 2016
Interest expense for the year ended August 31, 2015

Interest
expense on
borrowings(1)
 3,605
$
 3,087
$
 2,205
$

$
$
$

Cost of
swaps (2)

 1,588
 1,982
 2,827

$
$
$

Total

 5,193
 5,069
 5,032

(1) This amount is representative of the interest expense recognized on the underlying hedged transactions.
(2) This amount is representative of the interest expense recognized on the interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedging 

d

instruments.

F-69

PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) 

The total notional balance of the Company’s pay-fixed/receive-variable interest rate swaps and cross-currency interest 

rate swaps was as follows (in thousands):

Floating Rate Payer (Swap Counterparty)
Union Bank
Citibank N.A.
Scotiabank
Total

Notional Amount as of

August 31,
2017

August 31,
2016

$

$

 35,700
 26,088
 13,724
 75,512

$

$

 —
 30,188
 32,258
 62,446

The following table summarizes the  fair  value of interest rate swap and cross-currency interest rate swap derivative 

instruments that qualify for derivative hedge accounting (in thousands, except footnote data):

Derivatives designated as cash flow 
hedging instruments

Cross-currency interest rate swaps

Interest rate swaps

Cross-currency interest rate swaps
Net fair value of derivatives 
designated as hedging instruments

Fair Value Instruments

Balance Sheet
Location
Other non-current 
assets
Other long-term 
liabilities
Other long-term 
liabilities

August 31, 2017
Net Tax
Effect

Fair
Value

Net
OCI

August 31, 2016
Net Tax
Effect

Fair
Value

Net
OCI

$  2,547

 (950)

 1,597 $  3,224

 (1,248)

 1,976

 (231)

 80

 (151)

 (448)

 (451)

 135

 (316)

 (1,066)

 115

 320

 (333)

 (746)

$  1,865 $

 (735) $  1,130 $  1,710 $

 (813) $

 897

The  Company  has  entered  into  non-deliverable  forward  foreign-exchange  contracts.   These  contracts  are  treated  for 
accounting  purposes  as  fair  value  contracts  and  do  not  qualify  for  derivative  hedge  accounting.   The  use  of  non-deliverable 
forward  foreign-exchange contracts  is intended to offset changes in cash  flow attributable to currency exchange  movements. 
These contracts are intended primarily to economically hedge exposure to U.S. dollar merchandise inventory expenditures made 
by the Company’s international subsidiaries whose functional currency is other than the U.S. dollar.

ff

As of August 31, 2017 the Company did not have any open non-deliverable forward foreign-exchange contracts.

For  the  twelve-month  periods  ended August  31,  2017,  2016  and  2015,  the  Company  included  in  its  consolidated
statements of income the forward derivative (gain) or loss on the non-deliverable forward foreign-exchange contracts as follows
(in thousands):

Income Statement Classification
Other income (expense), net

on the consolidated balance sheet at August 31, 2017 or 2016.

NOTE 13 – RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Years Ended August 31
2016

2017

2015

$

 (387)

$

 (166) $

 6,533

e were no significant related assets or liabilities recorded 

Use of Private Plane:  From time to time members of the Company’s management use private planes owned in part 
by La Jolla Aviation, Inc. to travel to business meetings in Latin America and the Caribbean.  La Jolla Aviation, Inc. is solely
owned by The Robert and Allison Price Trust, and Robert Price the Company's Chairman of the Board, is a Director and Officer
of La Jolla Aviation, Inc. The Company has reimbursed La Jolla Aviation for such travel at the hourly rate of the Company's
private aircraft for such travel. The Company incurred expenses of approximately $182,000 and $225,000 for the years ended 
August 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, for these services. The Company did not use these services during the twelve months 
ended August 31, 2017.

f

F-70

  
 
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) 

Relationship with Aseprismar: Aseprismar is a PriceSmart employee association located in Costa Rica that purchases
discarded  packaging  materials  received  by  the  Company  from  incoming  shipments  of  merchandise.  The  Company  recorded 
approximately $128,000, $123,000 and $157,000 in other income  from the sale of packaging materials to Aseprismar for the
years ended August 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. In addition, the Company also contracts with Aseprismar for freight 
transportation between the Company's Costa Rica warehouse clubs. The Company incurred approximately $66,000, $80,000 and 
$35,000 for freight expense with Aseprismar for the years ended August 2017, 2016 and 2015.

Relationship with Francisco Velasco: Francisco Velasco is the Executive Vice President, General Counsel, Secretary
and Chief Ethics and Compliance Officer for the Company.  As part of his employment agreement dated July 2016, the Company
purchased his home in Chicago, IL, in July based on its appraised value for approximately $625,000. The Company also leased 
the property back to Francisco Velasco for $2,500 a month until he relocated to San Diego, CA.  The Company also reimbursed 
Francisco  Velasco  for  the  monthly  lease  payments.  For  the  year  ended  August  31,  2016,  the  Company  charged  and  then 
reimbursed approximately $2,500. There were no charges or reimbursements made during the year ended August 31, 2017. The 
Company intends to sell this property.

Relationships with Edgar Zurcher: Edgar Zurcher is a director of the Company. Mr. Zurcher is a partner in a law firm 
that the Company utilizes in certain legal matters. The Company incurred approximately $82,000, $26,000 and $18,000 in legal
expenses with this firm for the years ended August 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.  Mr. Zurcher is also a director of a 
company  that  owns  40%  of  Payless  ShoeSource  Holdings,  Ltd.,  which  rents  retail  space  from  the  Company. The  Company
recorded approximately $1.5 million in rental income for this space during the year ended August 31, 2017 and $1.4 million for
each  of  the  fiscal  years  ended,  2016  and  2015.  Additionally,  Mr.  Zurcher  is  a  director  of  Molinos  de  Costa  Rica  S.A.  The
Company paid approximately $636,000, $502,000 and $496,000 for products purchased from this entity during the years ended 
August  31,  2017,  2016  and  2015,  respectively.  Also,  Mr.  Zurcher  is  a  director  of  Roma Prince  S.A. PriceSmart  purchased 
products from this entity for approximately $1.1 million, $1.2 million and $1.3 million for the years ended August 31, 2017, 2016 
and 2015, respectively. 

Relationship with Gonzalo Barrutieta: Gonzalo Barrutieta is a director of the Company. Mr. Barrutieta is also a member
of the Board of Directors of Office Depot Mexico, S.A. de C.V., which operates OD Panama, S.A. ("ODP"), which rents retail
space from the Company. The Company has recorded approximately  $277,000, $272,000 and $266,000 in rental income and 
common  area  maintenance  charges  for  this  space  during  the  years  ended August  31,  2017,  2016  and  2015,  respectively.  In
addition, on December 11, 2015, the Company's joint venture Golf Park Plaza, S.A. ("GPP") transferred final ownership of land 
to ODP, following its execution of the related purchase option.  The deed was recorded with the relevant agencies in Panama 
during February 2016.  ODP had on July 15, 2011 (fiscal year 2011), entered into a 30 year operating lease, with an option to 
buy, for approximately 26,000 square feet of land owned by GPP.  The option to purchase the land had a three-year limit beginning
in April 2013.  As part of this transaction, ODP: (i) made an initial deposit to GPP in the sum of approximately $545,000 at the
 its building was completed and
time of signing the agreement; (ii) paid a second deposit of approximately $436,000 at the time
its store opened to the public; (iii) paid monthly rent per the lease clause of the agreement which the Company recognized on a
straight line basis; and (iv) contracted to pay an additional $109,000, less rental payments of $39,000 previously applied per the 
lease clause,  when ODP exercised its option to purchase the land. GPP recorded rental income of approximately  $1,000 and
$106,000, during the fiscal years ended August 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.  GPP recorded a gain, net of tax, on the sale of 
the land of approximately $851,000 during February 2016. 

f

Relationships with Price Family Charitable Organizations: During the years ended August 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, 
the Company sold approximately $393,000, $427,000 and $371,000, respectively, of supplies to Price Philanthropies Foundation. 
Robert Price, Chairman of the Company's Board of Directors, is the Chairman of the Board and President of Price Philanthropies 
Foundation  and  Price  Charities.  Sherry  S.  Bahrambeygui,  a  director of  the  Company  and Vice  Chair  of  the  Board,  serves  as
Executive Vice President, Secretary and Vice Chairman of the Boards of Price Charities, fka San Diego Revitalization Corp., and
Price  Philanthropies  Foundation. The  Company  also  participated  initially  with  Price  Charities,  a charitable  non-profit  public
benefit corporation, in a charitable program known as “Aprender y Crecer” ("Learn and Grow”) by allowing PriceSmart members 
to  donate  money  in  the  warehouse  clubs  to  that  program. Beginning  January  1,  2015,  the Aprender  y  Crecer  program  was 
transferred  from  Price  Charities  to  Price  Philanthropies  Foundation.  Since  2015,  the  Company  has  participated  with  Price
Philanthropies and selected vendors where the vendors channel donations through the Company based on a percentage of sales
of their products within the warehouse clubs. The Company collaborated with Price Charities, Price Philanthropies Foundation 
and local charitable groups to use these donations to acquire and deliver supplies to schools in the communities surrounding 
PriceSmart  clubs.  Vendors  send  their  donations  to  PriceSmart,  which  records  them  as  a  liability  for  donations  received.  The
liability for donations received, but not yet applied to the purchase of school supplies was approximately $102,000 and $139,000
as of August 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

y

Relationships with Mitchell G. Lynn: Mr. Lynn has been a director of the Company since November 2011. Mr. Lynn is the 
founder, limited partner and a general partner of CRI 2000, LP, dba Combined Resources International ("CRI"), which designs,

F-71

PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) 

develops  and  manufactures  consumer  products  for  domestic  and  international  wholesale  distribution,  primarily  through
warehouse clubs. The Company paid approximately $437,000, $625,000 and $353,000 for products purchased from this entity 
during the years ended August 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Mr. Lynn is also a founder, limited partner and a general
partner of ECR4Kids, LP ("ECR") which designs, manufactures and sells educational/children's products to wholesale dealers. 
The Company paid approximately $8,000, $3,000 and $31,000 for products purchased from this entity during the years ended 
August 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Mr. Lynn is also associated with Procuro, Inc., which is a services company that
specializes in Cold Chain Management solutions.  Mr. Lynn owns less than one percent of the issued and outstanding Procuro, 
Inc. shares and cannot significantly influence Procuro, Inc. The Company paid to Procuro, Inc. approximately $71,000, $95,000
and $76,000 for products purchased from this entity during the years ended August 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Relationship with Golf Park Plaza, S.A.: Golf Park Plaza, S.A. is a real estate joint venture located in Panama entered
into by the Company in 2008 (see Note 14 - Unconsolidated Affiliate). On December 12, 2013, the Company entered into a lease 
agreement  for  approximately  17,976  square  feet  (1,670  square  meters)  of  land  with  Golf  Park  Plaza,  S.A.  upon  which  the 
Company constructed its central offices in Panama. The lease term is for 15 years with three options to renew for five years each
at the Company's discretion. The monthly lease expense is approximately $8,800. For the twelve months ended August 31, 2017, 
2016 and 2015, the Company recognized rent expense of $105,700 for this lease for each such fiscal year.

Relationships with Pierre Mignault: Pierre Mignault was elected to the Board of Directors, effective August 1, 2015. 
Mr.  Mignault  has  been  a  consultant  for  the  Company  since  September  2009,  serving  as  an  independent  sourcing  agent  with 
Canadian suppliers. In his role as an independent sourcing agent, Mr. Mignault received commissions of $224,000, $208,000 and 
$154,000 from certain vendors related to the sale of product to the Company in fiscal years 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
In his role as consultant for the Company, he earned $60,000 in each year for the twelve months ended August 31, 2017, 2016
and 2015.

NOTE 14 – UNCONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES

The Company determines whether any of the joint ventures in which it has made investments is a Variable Interest Entity
(“VIE”) at the start of each new venture and if a reconsideration event has occurred.  At this time, the Company also considers
whether it must consolidate a VIE and/or disclose information about its involvement in a VIE.  A reporting entity must consolidate
a VIE if that reporting entity has a variable interest (or combination of variable interests) that will absorb a majority of the VIE's 
expected losses, receive a majority of the VIE's expected residual returns, or both.  A reporting entity must consider the rights 
and obligations conveyed by its variable interests and the relationship of its variable interests with variable interests held by other
parties to determine whether its variable interests will absorb a majority of a VIE's expected losses, receive a majority of  the
VIE's expected residual returns, or both.  The reporting entity that consolidates a VIE is called  the primary beneficiary of that 
VIE.

In 2008, the Company entered into real estate joint ventures to jointly own and operate separate commercial retail centers 
adjacent to warehouse clubs in Panama (Golf Park Plaza, S.A.) and Costa Rica (Plaza Alajuela, S.A.).  Due to the initial nature
of the joint ventures and the continued commitments for additional financing, the Company determined these joint ventures are 
VIEs.  Since all rights, obligations and the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the VIE's economic
performance is shared equally by both parties within each joint venture, the Company has determined that it is not the primary
beneficiary of the VIEs and, therefore, has accounted for these entities under the equity method.  Under the equity method, the
Company's investments in unconsolidated affiliates are initially recorded as an investment in the stock of an investee at cost and 
are adjusted for the carrying amount of the investment to recognize the investor's share of the earnings or losses of the investee
after the date of the initial investment.

On December 12, 2013, the Company entered into a lease agreement for approximately 17,976 square feet (1,670 square
meters) of land with Golf Park Plaza, S.A. upon which the Company constructed its central offices in Panama.  Construction of 
the offices was completed in October 2014.  The lease term is for 15 years with three options to renew for five years each at the
Company's discretion.  The Company recognized $105,700 in rent expense for the fiscal years ended August 31, 2017, 2016 and 
2015.

On December 11, 2015, the Company's joint venture Golf Park Plaza, S.A. ("GPP") transferred final ownership of land 
to OD Panama, S.A. ("ODP"), which is operated by Office Depot Mexico, S.A. de C.V., following its execution of the related 
purchase option.  The deed was recorded with the relevant agencies in Panama during February 2016.  ODP had on July 15, 2011 
(fiscal year 2011), entered into a 30 year operating lease, with an option to buy, for approximately  26,000 square feet of land
owned by GPP.  The option to purchase the land had a three-year limit beginning in April 2013.  As part of this transaction, ODP:
(i) made an initial deposit to GPP in the sum of approximately $545,000 at the time of signing the agreement; (ii) paid a second 
deposit of approximately $436,000 at the time its building was completed and its store opened to the public; (iii) paid monthly

F-72

  
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) 

rent per the lease clause of the agreement which the Company recognized on a straight line basis; and (iv) contracted to pay an
additional $109,000, less rental payments of $39,000 previously applied per the lease clause, when ODP exercised its option to
purchase the land.  ODP opened its store in April of 2013.  GPP recorded rental income on a straight line basis for approximately
$106,000, $72,000 and $12,000 during the fiscal years ended August 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.  During fiscal year 
2016  GPP  recorded  rental  income  for  approximately  $1,000.    GPP  recorded  a  gain,  net  of  tax,  on  the  sale  of  the  land  for 
approximately $851,000 during February 2016.  Gonzalo Barrutieta, who is a director of the Company, is also a member of the
Board of Directors of Office Depot Mexico, S.A. de C.V., which operates ODP.

The table below summarizes the Company’s interest in these VIEs and the Company’s maximum exposure to loss as a 

result of its involvement with these VIEs as of August 31, 2017 (in thousands):

%
Ownership

Initial
Investment

Additional
Investments

Net
(Loss)/Income
Inception to
Date

Company’s
Variable
Interest
in Entity

Commitment
to Future
Additional
Investments(1)

Company's
Maximum
Exposure
to Loss in
Entity(2)

 50 % $
 50 %

$

 4,616 $
 2,193
 6,809 $

 2,402 $
 1,236
 3,638 $

 294 $
 24
 318 $

 7,312 $
 3,453
 10,765 $

 99 $

 785
 884 $

 7,411
 4,238
 11,649

Entity
GolfPark Plaza, S.A.
Price Plaza Alajuela, S.A.
Total

(1) The parties intend to seek alternate financing for the project, which could reduce the amount of investments each party would 
be required to provide.  The parties may mutually agree on changes to the project, which could increase or decrease the 
amount of contributions each party is required to provide.

(2) The maximum exposure is determined by adding the Company’s variable interest in the entity and any explicit or implicit 

arrangements that could require the Company to provide additional financial support.

The summarized financial information of the unconsolidated affiliates is as follows (in thousands):

Current assets
Noncurrent assets
Current liabilities
Noncurrent liabilities

Net income (loss)

NOTE 15 – SEGMENTS

August 31,
2017

August 31,
2016

$
$
$
$

 1,221
 11,207
 226
 26

$
$
$
$

 663
 11,752
 219
 16

Years Ended August 31,
2016

2015

2017

$

 (1)

$

 332

$

 94

The Company and its subsidiaries are principally engaged in the international operation of membership shopping in 39 
warehouse clubs located in 13 countries/territories that are located in Central America, the Caribbean and Colombia.  In addition,
the Company operates distribution centers and corporate offices in the United States.  The Company has aggregated its warehouse
clubs, distribution centers and corporate offices into reportable segments.  The Company’s reportable segments are based on
management’s organization of these locations into operating segments by general geographic location, used by management and 
the Company's chief operating decision maker in setting up management lines of responsibility, providing support services, and
making operational decisions and assessments of financial performance.  Segment amounts are presented after converting to U.S.
dollars and consolidating eliminations.  Certain revenues, operating costs and inter-company charges included in the United States 
segment are not allocated to the segments within this presentation, as it is impractical to do so, and they appear as reconciling
items to reflect the amount eliminated on consolidation of intersegment transactions. From time to time, the Company revises the 
measurement of each segment's operating income and net income, including certain corporate overhead allocations, and other 
measures  as  determined  by  the  information  regularly  reviewed  by  the  Company's  chief  operating  decision  maker. When  the
Company does so, the previous period amounts and balances are reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation.

The following tables summarize by segment certain revenues, operating costs and balance sheet items (in thousands):

F-73

  
PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) 

Years Ended August 31, 2017

Revenue from external customers

Intersegment revenues

Depreciation and amortization

Operating income (loss)

Interest income from external sources

Interest income from intersegment sources

Interest expense from external sources

Interest expense from intersegment sources

Provision for income taxes

Net income (loss)

Long-lived assets (other than deferred tax assets)

Goodwill

Investment in unconsolidated affiliates

Total assets

Capital expenditures, net

Years Ended August 31, 2016

Revenue from external customers

Intersegment revenues

Depreciation and amortization

Operating income (loss)

Interest income from external sources

Interest income from intersegment sources

Interest expense from external sources

Interest expense from intersegment sources

Provision for income taxes

Net income (loss)

Goodwill

Investment in unconsolidated affiliates

Total assets

Capital expenditures, net

Years Ended August 31, 2015

Revenue from external customers

Intersegment revenues

Depreciation and amortization

Operating income (loss)

Interest income from external sources

Interest income from intersegment sources

Interest expense from external sources

Interest expense from intersegment sources

Provision for income taxes

Net income (loss)

Long-lived assets (other than deferred tax assets)

Goodwill

Investment in unconsolidated affiliates

Total assets

Capital expenditures, net

United
States
Operations

Central
American
Operations

Caribbean
Operations

Colombia 
Operations

Reconciling
Items(1)

Total

$

 34,244 $

 1,789,889  $

 827,920  $

 344,575  $

 — $

 2,996,628  

 110 

 (1,143,432)

 1,138,526

 6,653

 10,436

 13

 739

 762

 42

 9,560

 3,893

 70,353

 —

 —

 147,650

 56,229

 —

 20,252  

 134,826  

 914  

 882  

 4,127  

 1,106  

 4,796  

 10,205  

 47,190  

 740  

 546  

 548  

 990  

 23,368  

 107,797  

 7,654  

 38,403  

 9,182 

 4,932 

 142 

 —

 1,340 

 34 

 1,436 

 1,786 

 296,915  

 122,616  

 126,206 

 31,118  

 10,765  

 4,524  

 —

 —

 —

 544,683  

 303,234  

 181,947 

 50,977  

 26,586  

 3,232 

 —

 (61,155)

 —

 (2,167)

 —

 (2,172)

 —

 (61,155)

 —

 —

 —

 —

 —

 1,086,677

 4,775
 10,970 (2)

 —

 18,673  

 5,941  

 9,907  

 135,232  

 51,450  

 25

 2,519

 —

 61

 10,047

 935 (2)

 802  

 944  

 4,823  

 2,059  

 23,227  

 381  

 554  

 547  

 1,854  

 8,697  

 —

 (1,092,618)

 6,439 

 (5,403)

 99 

 —

 521 

 49 

 878 

 —

 (55,526)

 —

 (4,017)

 —

 (4,023)

 —

 107,396  

 43,114  

 (7,196)

 (55,526)

 —

 —

 100,744

 8,617

31,091

 10,767  

4,546

 —

 —

 —

 515,478  

 287,088  

 193,425 

 29,375  

 11,402  

 30,300 

 —

 —

 —

 —

 —

 46,292  

 136,229  

 1,809  

 —

 6,777  

 —

 42,018  

 90,724  

 616,090  

 35,642  

 10,765  

 1,177,514  

 137,024  

 —

 39,794  

 136,723  

 1,307  

 —

 5,891  

 —

 42,849  

 88,723  

 536,286  

 35,637  

 10,767  

 1,096,735  

 79,694  

$

 33,885 $

 1,758,853  $

 840,648  $

 271,790  $

 — $

 2,905,176  

$

 33,320 $

 1,625,567  $

 821,047  $

 322,669  $

 — $

 2,802,603  

 1,107,592

 2,733

 28,789

 79

 3,142

 5

 126

 15,548

 13,551

 15,391

 —

 —

 89,133

 1,655

 —

 15,115  

 5,626  

 9,605  

 129,555  

 48,856  

 811  

 282  

 4,147  

 1,204  

 24,618  

 114  

 556  

 607  

 1,966  

 6,787  

 —

 (1,113,218)

 6,992 

 (1,846)

 54 

 —

 1,681 

 684 

 613 

 —

 (58,988)

 —

 (3,980)

 —

 (3,980)

 —

 101,190  

 41,130  

 (7,759)

 (58,988)

 255,576  

 107,746  

 105,290 

 31,211  

 10,317  

 4,660  

 —

 —

 —

 491,155  

 239,272  

 171,664 

 54,735  

 10,619  

 24,172 

 —

 —

 —

 —

 —

 —

 34,445  

 146,366  

 1,058  

 —

 6,440  

 —

 47,566  

 89,124  

 484,003  

 35,871  

 10,317  

 991,224  

 91,181  

F-74

Long-lived assets (other than deferred tax assets)

 19,222

 271,039  

 108,426  

 137,599 

PRICESMART, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) 

(1) The reconciling items reflect the amount eliminated on consolidation of intersegment transactions.
(2)The decrease in operating income and net income for the United States Operations in fiscal year 2016 compared to fiscal year
2015  was  primarily  a  result  of  the  increase  in  operating  expenses  related  to  intercompany  transactions  with  the  Company’s 
Colombia subsidiary of approximately $10.9 million.  This activity results in reductions to taxable income in the U.S. that lowered 
the provision for income taxes by approximately $3.9 million. 

NOTE 16 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

The Company  has evaluated  all events subsequent to the balance sheet date of August 31, 2017 through the date of 
issuance of these consolidated financial statements and has determined that, except as set forth below, there are no subsequent
events that require disclosure.

Non-deliverable forward foreign-exchange contracts

The Company’s Colombia subsidiary has entered into five forward exchange contracts for approximately $5.0 million

with settlement dates of November and December 2017.

NOTE 17 – QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)

Summarized quarterly financial information for fiscal years 2017, 2016 and 2015 is as follows (in thousands, except per 

share data):

Fiscal Year 2017
Total net warehouse club and export sales
Total cost of goods sold
Net income
Basic net income per share
Diluted net income per share

Fiscal Year 2016
Total net warehouse club and export sales
Total cost of goods sold
Net income
Basic net income per share
Diluted net income per share

Fiscal Year 2015
Total net warehouse club and export sales
Total cost of goods sold
Net income
Basic net income per share
Diluted net income per share

Three Months Ended,

Year Ended,
Nov 30, 2016 Feb 28, 2017 May 31, 2017 Aug 31, 2017 Aug 31, 2017
 2,944,306
$
 2,519,752
$
 90,724
$
 2.98
$
 2.98
$

 717,174 $
 617,598 $
 18,838 $
 0.62 $
 0.62 $

 780,445 $
 667,563 $
 27,219 $
 0.90 $
 0.90 $

 719,874 $
 615,920 $
 19,798 $
 0.64 $
 0.64 $

 726,813 $
 618,671 $
 24,869 $
 0.82 $
 0.82 $

Three Months Ended,

Year Ended,
Nov 30, 2015 Feb 29, 2016 May 31, 2016 Aug 31, 2016 Aug 31, 2016
 2,854,553
$
 2,449,626
$
 88,723
$
 2.92
$
 2.92
$

 691,638 $
 597,242 $
 16,837 $
 0.55 $
 0.55 $

 698,316 $
 596,644 $
 22,272 $
 0.74 $
 0.74 $

 765,536 $
 657,725 $
 25,942 $
 0.85 $
 0.85 $

 699,063 $
 598,015 $
 23,672 $
 0.78 $
 0.78 $

Three Months Ended,

Year Ended,
Nov 30, 2014 Feb 28, 2015 May 31, 2015 Aug 31, 2015 Aug 31, 2015
 2,754,411
$
 2,352,839
$
 89,124
$
 2.95
$
 2.95
$

 684,780 $
 587,860 $
 21,195 $
 0.70 $
 0.70 $

 686,436 $
 586,114 $
 22,447 $
 0.75 $
 0.75 $

 738,349 $
 631,810 $
 24,835 $
 0.82 $
 0.82 $

 644,846 $
 547,055 $
 20,647 $
 0.68 $
 0.68 $

F-75

 
  
 
PRICESMART, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The Company's common stock has been quoted and traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol
“PSMT” since September 2, 1997. As of October 18, 2017, there were approximately 23,510 holders of record of the common 
stock. 

2017 FISCAL QUARTERS
First Quarter
Second Quarter
Third Quarter
Fourth Quarter

2016 FISCAL QUARTERS
First Quarter
Second Quarter
Third Quarter
Fourth Quarter

Dates

Stock Price

From

To

High

Low

9/1/2016
12/1/2016
3/1/2017
6/1/2017

11/30/2016 $
2/29/2017
5/31/2017
8/31/2017

9/1/2015
12/1/2015
3/1/2016
6/1/2016

11/30/2015 $
2/29/2016
5/31/2016
8/31/2016

$

$

 92.40
 92.15
 93.60
 89.20

 97.26
 93.80
 88.95
 94.28

 80.35
 82.50
 85.85
 80.50

 76.65
 70.11
 78.00
 76.00

76

 
  The graph below matches PriceSmart, Inc.'s cumulative 5-Year total shareholder return on common stock with the 
cumulative total returns of the NASDAQ Composite index and the NASDAQ Retail Trade index. The graph tracks
the performance of a $100 investment in our common stock and in each index (with the reinvestment of all
dividends) from 8/31/2012 to 8/31/2017. 

COMPAPP RISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVAA

E TOTATT L RETURN*

Among PriceSmart, Inc., the NASDAQ Composite Index
and the NASDAQ Retail Trade Index

$300

$250

$200

$150

$100

$50

$0

8/12

8/13

8/14

8/15

8/16

8/17

PriceSmart, Inc.

NASDAQ Composite

NASDAQ Retail Trade

*$100 invested on 8/31/12 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends.
Fiscal year ending August 31.

PriceSmart, Inc.
NASDAQ Composite 
NASDAQ Retail Trade 

8/12

100.00
100.00
100.00

8/13

8/14

118.38 
118.95 
117.24 

124.37 
154.14 
135.84 

8/15 

118.91 
162.16 
175.92 

8/16

117.91
178.11
210.55

8/17

115.63 
221.23 
242.10 

The stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

There were no sales of unregistered securities during the year ended August 31, 2017. 

77

  
  
  
Dividends

Declared
2/3/2017
2/3/2016
2/4/2015

First Payment

Record
Date
2/15/2017

Date
Paid

Second Payment
Date
Paid

Record
Date
8/15/2017

Amount
$  0.70

Amount
8/31/2017 $  0.35
   $  0.70     2/15/2016    2/29/2016 $  0.35     8/15/2016    8/31/2016 $  0.35
8/31/2015 $  0.35

Amount
2/28/2017 $  0.35

2/27/2015 $  0.35

2/13/2015

8/14/2015

$  0.70

The Company anticipates the ongoing payment of  semi-annual dividends in  subsequent  periods, although the actual
declaration of future dividends, the amount of such dividends, and the establishment of record and payment dates is subject to 
final  determination  by  the  Board  of  Directors at  its  discretion  after  its  review  of  the  Company’s  financial  performance  and 
anticipated capital requirements. 

Repurchase of Equity Securities

Upon vesting of restricted stock awarded by the Company to employees, the Company repurchases shares and withholds
the amount of the repurchase payment to cover employees’ tax withholding obligations. As set forth in the table below, during
fiscal year 2017, the Company repurchased a total of 38,634 shares in the indicated months. These were the only repurchases of 
equity securities made by the Company during fiscal year 2017. The Company does not have a stock repurchase program.

Period
September 1, 2016 - September 30, 2016

November 1, 2016 - November 30, 2016
December 1, 2016 - December 31, 2016
January 1, 2017 - January 31, 2017
February 1, 2017 - February 29, 2017
March 1, 2017 - March 31, 2017
April 1, 2017 - April 30, 2017
May 1, 2017 - May 31, 2017
June 1, 2017 - June 30, 2017
July 1, 2017 - July 31, 2017
August 1, 2017 - August 31, 2017
Total

(a)
Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased

(b)
Average
Price Paid
Per Share
 —
 —
 —
 —
 82.96
 84.70
 91.30
 —
 —
 —
 84.65
 81.10
 82.66

 — $
 —
 —
 —
 23,283
 108
 771
 —
 —
 —
 2,398
 12,074
 38,634

$

(c)
Total Number of
Shares Purchased
as Part of Publicly
Publicly Announced
Plans or Programs

(d)
Maximum Number
of Shares That May
Yet Be Purchased
Under the
Plans or Programs

 —
 —
 —
 —
 —
 —
 —
 —
 —
 —
 —
 —
 —

N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

78

  
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Corporate Offices
9740 Scranton Road
San Diego, CA 92121
(858) 404-8800

Stock Exchange Listing
NASDAQ Global Select Market
Stock Symbol: PSMT

Annual Meeting
Wednesday, January 24, 2018 at 10:00 AM
PriceSmart, Inc. Corporate Headquarters
9740 Scranton Road
San Diego, CA 92121

Transfer Agent
Computershare Shareowner Services LLC
480 Washington Blvd.
Jersey City, NJ 07310
Telephone: (888) 867-6003
TDD for Hearing Impaired: (800) 952-9245
Outside U.S.: (201) 680-6578

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Ernst & Young LLP
4370 La Jolla Village Drive, Suite 500
San Diego, CA 92122

PriceSmart's annual reports to the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form 10-K and any quarterly reports on Form 10-Q,
as amended, will be provided free of charge upon written request to Investor Relations, PriceSmart, Inc., 9740 Scranton Road., 
San Diego, CA 92121. Internet users can access PriceSmart's web site at http://www.pricesmart.com.

79

  
 
  
 
 
DIRECTORS & OFFICERS OF PRICESMART, INC.

Chairman of the Board
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director

Chief Executive Officer & President
Executive Vice President - Real Estate
Executive Vice President - Chief Merchandising Officer
Executive Vice President - Logistics and Distribution
Executive Vice President - Construction & Facilities
Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
Executive Vice President - Operations
Executive Vice President & Chief Operating Officer
Executive Vice President - Information Technology
Executive Vice President - General Counsel, Chief Ethics & Compliance 
Officer, and Secretary

Robert E. Price   
Sherry Bahrambeygui 
Gonzalo Barrutietaa
Gordon Hanson  n
Leon Janks 
Jose Luis Laparte 
Mitch Lynn
n
Gary Malino 
Pierre Mignault  t
r
Edgar Zurcher

Jose Luis Laparte 
Rodrigo Calvo
Jesus Von Chong 
Frank Diaz 
Brud E. Drachman 
John M. Heffnerr
John D. Hildebrandt  
William J. Naylon
n
Laura Santana  
Francisco Velasco

a

Catherine D. Alvarez-Smith
Ana Luisa Bianchi
Bob Coulson
n
J. Ernesto Grijalva 
Paul Kovaleski   
Jose Lopez 
Jose Luis Marin  
Michael L. McCleary
y
Alberto Morales
Atul Patel
Chris Souhrada
Pedro Vera
a
J. Phillip Wilson
n
Benjamin M. Woods 

Senior Vice President - International Controller
Senior Vice President - Merchandising – Latin America Local
Senior Vice President - Merchandising – Nonfoods 
Senior Vice President - Legal Affairs – Latin America/Caribbean
ff
Senior Vice President - Other Business
Senior Vice President - Merchandising – Fresh Foods
Senior Vice President - Marketing & Member Services
Senior Vice President - Corporate Controller
Senior Vice President - Human Resources
Senior Vice President - Treasurer
Senior Vice President - Operations – ES/GT/HN/CR
Senior Vice President - South America
Senior Vice President - Merchandising – U.S. Hardlines
Senior Vice President - US/Caribbean Fresh Foods

n

Alexa Bodden  
Linda C. Brickson
n
u
Guadalupe Cefalu
Eduardo Franceschi 
Jonathan Mendozaa
Michelle Obediente 
Kelly Orme 
Emma Reyes 
Ronald Rodriquez
Christina Santmyre 
Eric Torres 
Melissa Twoheyy

Vice President - Membership & Marketing - CAM/Colombia
Vice President - U.S. Controller
Vice President - Forecasting & Planning
Vice President - Operations – Panama/Nicaragua
Vice President - Construction & Facilities
Vice President - Merchandising – Regional Foods
Vice President – Merchandising – Electronics
Vice President - International Logistics & Trade Compliance
Vice President - Logistics
Vice President - Distribution
Vice President - Facility Maintenance & Equipment
Vice President – Merchandising – US Foods

80

  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
®