Quarterlytics / Consumer Defensive / Agricultural Farm Products / Pro Medicus

Pro Medicus

pme · ASX Consumer Defensive
Claim this profile
Ticker pme
Exchange ASX
Sector Consumer Defensive
Industry Agricultural Farm Products
Employees 51-200
← All annual reports
FY2013 Annual Report · Pro Medicus
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
T
R
O
P
E
R
L
A
U
N
N
A

P

R

O

M

E

D

I

C

U

S

L

I

M

I

T

E

D

A

N

N

U

A

L

R

E

P

O

R

T

2

0

1

3

450 Swan Street  

Richmond, VIC, 3121 

(03) 9429 8800

www.promedicus.com.au 

www.promedicus.com 

www.visageimaging.com

ProMed 2013 Annual Report Cover Artwork.indd   1

4/10/13   10:47 AM

 
 
 
 
 
1  Highlights 2012/2013

3  CEO and Chairman’s Letter 

5  Financial Summary

7  Business Background

9  Global Leadership Team

11

  The Year in Review 

13

  Into the Future

15

  Financial Statements

16

  Director’s Report

60  Director’s Declaration

62  Independent Audit Report

64  ASX Additional Information

65  Corporate Governance

71  Corporate Information

S
T
N
E
T
N
O
C

2012–2013 
HIGHLIGHTS

FINANCIAL SUMMARY
 X Profit after tax of $5.13 million – up 186.5%

 X Revenue from continuing operations $11.37 million – in line with previous year

 X Cash reserves of $18.02 million – increase of 247.2%

 X Company remains debt free

 X Dividend of 2.0c per share – fully franked

BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS
 X Ongoing deployment of Coral, the company’s new technology platform

 X North America revenue increased by 26.9%

 X Pivotal sale to vRad – one of the world’s largest radiology groups

 X Increased interest in Visage technology 

ProMed 2013 Annual Report Cover Artwork.indd   2

ProMed AR13 Final.indd   1

1    

10/10/13   4:15 PM

4/10/13   10:47 AM

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dr Sam Hupert

Peter Kempen

Dear Shareholders,

The 2013 financial year saw a mix 
of results for the company. Whilst 
North American revenue increased by 
26.9% this was offset by decreases in 
the company’s European operations 
as well as increased costs associated 
with the ongoing commercialisation  
of Coral, the company’s new 
technology platform. 

In July 2012, the company sold the 
Amira software platform business  
to a European IT company for  
€12.1 million (approximately  
A$14 million), having bought the 
business in February 2009 as part 
of its acquisition of Visage Imaging 
from Mercury Computer Systems. 
The sale generated a one-off, after-
tax profit of $8.45 million. This was 
partially offset by an assessment of 
the carrying value of the company’s 
intangible assets which yielded an 
after-tax impairment loss of $3.22 
million resulting in a full year profit of 
$5.13 million. 

During the year significant 
progress was made on the ongoing 
deployment and implementation 
of Coral, the company’s new RIS 
technology platform in Australia. The 
company is pleased to announce 
that the new RIS technology platform 
has been successfully implemented 
at a number of new client sites and 
is scheduled to be rolled out to 
our existing customer base in the 
near future. To date, feedback for 
the product has been very positive 
reconfirming our belief that this 
new system represents a quantum 
improvement over anything currently 
in the market.

The company has also continued 
investing in ongoing R & D of the 
Visage 7 suite of products which, 
based on the company’s unique 
thin client technology, combines 
conventional 2D x-ray imaging with the 
new 3D volume rendering of images. 

The company continues to see the 
benefits resulting from management 
changes made late in 2010 and we 
anticipate these will continue to 
be instrumental in maintaining the 
company on a long term course of 
profitable growth.

The company announced in 
May 2013 that its wholly-owned 
subsidiary, Visage Imaging Inc, has 
signed a pivotal five-year agreement 
with US group vRad (Virtual 
Radiologic), one the world’s largest 
radiology groups. vRad, whose more 
than 400 radiologists read more than 
7 million radiology studies annually, 
will implement Visage 7 as a central 
component of its new technology 
platform focused on delivering a real-
time, ‘read anywhere, read anytime’ 
environment. 

This agreement represented a 
key milestone for Pro Medicus in 
North America. Revenue from this 
contract is expected to commence 
in the October/November timeframe 
and build as the Visage software 
is progressively rolled out to vRad 
sites thereby providing significant 
upside potential. The company is 
also experiencing increased interest 
in Visage from others in the North 
American market which your directors 
feel is encouraging. 

The vRad deal continues the trend 
towards the increased adoption of 
a pay per use pricing model. Whilst 
this does not have the same degree 
of upfront payment as an outright 
purchase (capital) model, it provides 
a growing recurring revenue stream 
which longer term will provide greater 
predictability of future earnings. 

Pro Medicus now has the strongest 
balance sheet in its history with a 
cash position of $18.02 million as at 
the end of June 2013, up from $5.19 
million in June 2012 an increase of 
247.2%. This provides sufficient 
reserves to fund the anticipated 
growth of the business from internal 
sources. The company continues to 
be debt free. 

As a result, your directors were 
pleased to announce an increased 
dividend of 2c per share fully franked 
and believe that our strong balance 
sheet leaves us well placed to 
maintain our dividend policy in the 
coming years.

We would also like to express our 
sincere thanks to our fellow directors 
and to the energetic team we have at 
both Pro Medicus and Visage Imaging, 
each of whom has contributed to a 
year that continues to put us on a 
solid path for the future. 

Yours faithfully, 

Peter Kempen 
CHAIRMAN

Dr Sam Hupert 
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICE

I

N
A
M
R
A
H
C
D
N
A
O
E
C

R
E
T
T
E
L

2     Annual Report 2013

3    

 
 
 
YEAR  
ENDED 
30 JUNE 2013
All figures in $A thousands unless 
otherwise stated

2013 
$’000

11,374
-0.04%

327
-89.1%

11,701
-18.7%

7,327
+190.2%

5,131
+186.5%

2012  
$’000

11,379 
+1.8%

3,013 
+4.3%

14,392 
+2.3%

2,525 
+321.5%

1,791 
+256.1%

29,418

23,144

Revenues from Continuing Operations

Revenues from Discontinued Operations (Amira)

Total Revenues

Operating Profit Before Interest and Income Tax

Net Profit After Tax

Total Assets 30 June

Shareholders’ Funds 30 June

20,959

16,002

Net Tangible Assets per Share at 30 June (cents)

Earnings per Share (cents)

15.0

5.1
+183.3%

5.0

1.8 
+260.0%

I

L
A
C
N
A
N
F

I

Y
R
A
M
M
U
S

4     Annual Report 2013

5    

 
 
PRO MEDICUS IS A LEADING PROVIDER OF IT 
PRODUCTS AND SERVICES TO THE HEALTHCARE 
INDUSTRY. WORKING TOGETHER WITH OUR CLIENTS 
WORLDWIDE, PRO MEDICUS IS HELPING TO SOLVE 
OUR CLIENT’S DAILY CHALLENGE OF DELIVERING 
IMPROVED LEVELS OF HEALTH CARE BY MAKING 
SURE OUR USERS HAVE THE RIGHT INFORMATION AT 
THE RIGHT TIME, AND ARE ABLE TO PUT IT TO USE 
IN THE MOST EFFICIENT MANNER. BUILDING ON OUR 
CLINICAL AND PRACTICE MANAGEMENT EXPERTISE, 
WE HAVE FOUND INCREASINGLY INNOVATIVE WAYS 
TO DELIVER VALUE TO OUR CLIENTS. 

In February of 2009, the company 
acquired Visage Imaging in the 
US which has expanded the Pro 
Medicus product portfolio into the 
clinical imaging space as well as 
providing the company with its own 
presence in both Europe and the US.

The suite of Pro Medicus solutions 
which previously comprised of 
Practice Management, e-health and 
digital imaging integration products 
now includes the Visage suite of 
2-D and 3-D digital radiology (PACS) 
and Advanced Visualisation clinical 
products plus a comprehensive range 
of services centred on the company’s 
numerous offerings. These include 
training and installation, hardware 
configuration and ongoing technical 
and end user support.

In addition to the 2-D PACS 
and 3-D/advanced visualisation 
products, the Visage Imaging 
acquisition brought with it  
a number of other revenue  
streams including OEM (original 
equipment manufacturer) and  
dealer relationships.

The activities of Pro 
Medicus in the financial 
year ending June 30, 2013 
can be characterised by the 
following revenue streams:

Radiology Information 
Systems (RIS)/Practice 
Management
The business consists of a range of 
integrated software applications and 
services that are designed to aid the 
management of medical practices. 
The primary products in this area 
include medical accounting, clinical 
reporting, appointments/scheduling 
and marketing/management 
information applications.  Services 
include network design and 
implementation, hardware sourcing 
and configuration, staff and 
management training and ongoing 
technical and end user support.

E-health 
Pro Medicus’ Internet-based 
e-health offering, promedicus.net, 
enables referring doctors to receive 
encrypted clinical reports via the 
Internet to a centralised “In-Tray” 
run on a doctor’s computer. These 
reports are then electronically 
incorporated into the patients’ 
medical record, doing away with 
the need for double handling or 
manual filing. Over 26,000 Australian 
doctors are registered users of 
promedicus.net.

Integration products
Pro Medicus has developed a 
range of highly modular integration 
products which provide a seamless 
interface between the Pro Medicus 
Practice Management System 
and a number of 3rd party PACS/
digital imaging products allowing 
large diagnostic imaging providers 
to incrementally implement this 
technology across their enterprise. 
Revenue is generated from the 
sale of software licenses for the 
integration modules, implementation 
services and ongoing support.  

Visage 3-D Advanced 
Visualisation
Advanced visualisation allows CT 
and MRI images to be reconstructed 
in 3D and 4D (3D with motion). A 
growing number of specialist areas 
are being revolutionised by this 
technology including cardiology, 
where it provides 3-D reconstruction 
of coronary arteries from high 
definition CT images, oncology 
via the introduction of PET CT and 
advanced areas of stroke treatment 
and neuro-radiology. This product 
can be interfaced to a broad range 
of third-party PACS Systems and is 
sold as a 3-D “plug in “. Revenue 
is derived by sale of licences and 
ongoing support.

The Visage 7  
Enterprise Viewer
The Visage 7 Enterprise Viewer 
combines the 3-D/4-D and 
advanced visualisation capabilities 
with the full gamut of 2-D reading 
functionality creating a truly unique 
thin client streaming Universal 
viewing platform that enables 
radiologist to read anything from a 
2-D chest x-ray to a complicated 
3-D cardiac study all within the one 
viewer. The Enterprise viewer can 
be interfaced with a broad range 
of third party image archiving and 
distribution products. These include 
other 3rd party PACS systems 
upon which Visage technology can 
be overlaid as well as the growing 
industry trend for vendor neutral 
archives (VNA).  Traditionally revenue 
for this product has been generated 
from sale of licences and ongoing 
support however we are seeing the 
increased adoption of a pay per use 
licensing model which is helping 
to build growing annuity revenue 
streams for the company particularly 
in the US.

Visage 3D PACS 
As a result of the extensive R & D 
undertaken post the Visage Imaging 
acquisition, the company now has 
its own comprehensive 2D-3D /
PACS offering which combines the 
Visage 7 Enterprise Viewer with 
the ability to store and archive 
radiological images creating one of 
the world’s first “3-D PACS”. The 
company is now selling this solution 
in North America, Australia, and 
select countries within Europe. 

Due to the highly modular nature 
of our product offering, Visage 
technology can be successfully 
deployed in the vast majority of 
radiology environments including 
private imaging centres, remote 
reading/teleradiology groups as well 
as large teaching hospitals opening 
up markets previously not available 
or only partially accessible to us. 

Life Sciences — Research
The Amira business was sold to 
Visualization Sciences Group  
(VSG) in July 2012 for a sum of € 
€12.1 million.

D
N
U
O
R
G
K
C
A
B

S
S
E
N
S
U
B

I

6     Annual Report 2013

7    

 
Key Personnel

Danny Tauber 
General Manager 
Australia 

After graduating in 1986 Danny 
Tauber started his career with 
chartered accountants Warnocks 
gaining experience in taxation and 
general accounting. He then started 
his own property development 
company and spent a number of 
years gaining project management 
and general finance skills. An 
interest in IT led Danny into the 
computer industry where he worked 
for a company producing hotel 
management systems. Danny joined 
Pro Medicus in 1993 and has been 
with the company for over 20 years. 
Danny has progressed through the 
company to his current position of 
General Manager – Australia which he 
assumed on the 1st of January 2011. 

Malte Westerhoff 
General Manager 
Europe

Malte Westerhoff is the General 
Manager for Visage Imaging GmbH, 
the European branch of Visage 
Imaging. He is also the Chief 
Technical Officer and is responsible 
for product management and the 
R&D groups of Visage Imaging 
globally. He has more than eleven 
years of experience in medical 
imaging and software development, 
holding positions in research and 
industry. Dr. Westerhoff holds a 
master’s degree in physics from 
Technical University, Berlin, and  
a PhD in computer science  
and mathematics from Free 
University, Berlin. 

Mr. Westerhoff is one of the 
founders of Indeed - Visual 
Concepts GmbH and author and 
co-author of many scientific papers 
in scientific visualization and high-
performance computing and was 
instrumental in developing many of 
the patented and patent pending 
technologies that form the basis of 
Visage Imaging’s product portfolio. 
Prior to joining the Pro Medicus 
group, he has served at Mercury 
Computer Systems and Indeed - 
Visual Concepts in senior positions. 
Before that, he has worked at Zuse 
Institute Berlin (ZIB) as scientist in 
brain research.

Brad Levin 
General Manager 
North America  
& Global Vice President of Marketing 

Brad Levin’s broad experience has 
spanned a variety of leadership 
roles, including government, 
consulting, and marketing. While 
in government, Brad worked as 
a PACS subject matter expert for 
the renowned US Department 
of Defence’s Digital Imaging 
Network–Picture Archiving 
and Communications System 
(DIN-PACS) initiative, as well as 
consulting for top healthcare 
institutions across the US. 

After leaving his consulting role, 
Brad went on to spearhead 
marketing for two web-based 
PACS start-ups, first AMICAS, and 
then Dynamic Imaging. Both firms 
experienced rapid commercial 
growth leading to acquisition, by 
Vitalworks and GE Healthcare, 
respectively. In his most recent 
role, Brad was GE Healthcare’s 
commercial Marketing Director, 
where he had radiology and 
cardiology marketing responsibility 
for their RIS, PACS and CVIT 
product portfolios.  Brad joined 
Visage Imaging in August 2011.

I

P
H
S
R
E
D
A
E
L

L
A
B
O
L
G

M
A
E
T

8     Annual Report 2013

9    

 
 
United States
The Group employs 8 people in North 
America to fulfill the sales marketing 
and professional services roles. 
Revenue from North America increased 
by 26.9% compared to the previous 
year.  This was largely attributable to an 
increase in transaction based revenue 
from sales of Visage technology as 
more contracts come on stream as well 
as an increase in Original Equipment 
Manufacturer (OEM) sales in this region.

Europe
Pro Medicus established a presence  
in Europe with the acquisition of Visage 
Imaging GmbH in late January 2009.  
The group has 38 employees in its Berlin 
office who undertake research and 
development of Visage Imaging products 
worldwide as well as sales, marketing 
and service/support functions for the 
group’s European operations. Revenue 
from our European operations decreased 
by 22.6% compared to the previous  
year due to deteriorating European 
market conditions.

COMPANY OFFICES

Pro Medicus Limited — Melbourne
This is the company’s Global and Australian headquarters and is 
the base for all Australian sales, marketing, service and support as 
well as R&D for Coral the company’s new technology platform. 

Visage Imaging GmbH — Berlin
This is the company’s European headquarters and houses 38 staff, 
the majority which are involved in product research and development 
and ongoing product support. This office also forms the base of the 
company’s European operations including order administration and 
both direct and OEM sales activities.

Visage Imaging Inc — San Diego 
This is the company’s US headquarters and is the base for 8 staff 
who are involved in sales, marketing, training/implementation and 
applications support for both the Visage Imaging offerings and the 
existing Pro Medicus products.

Australia
The Group employs 28 people in Australia who 
undertake research and development of Pro 
Medicus products (RIS) as well as sales and 
service/support functions.

The Group’s Australian revenue was marginally 
above last year’s result despite an increasingly 
competitive local market with overall profit being 
affected by increased costs associated with the 
ongoing commercialisation and roll-out of the 
Company’s new Coral RIS technology platform.

The company now has a growing number of 
installations of its new technology platform (Coral) 
and is commencing the roll-out of this exciting 
technology to its existing customer base.

Promedicus.net, the company’s e-health offering, 
continued to hold its strong market position 
despite increasing competition.

3
1
0
2
–
2
1
0
2

I

W
E
V
E
R

10     Annual Report 2013

11    

 
EXPANDED PRODUCT  
PORTFOLIO

GROUND BREAKING 
VISAGE 7 TECHNOLOGY

CONTINUED  
US EXPANSION

ADDRESSING  
HOSPITAL MARKETS

NEW RIS TECHNOLOGY  
PLATFORM

PAY PER USE  
LICENSING MODEL

E
H
T
O
T
N

I

E
R
U
T
U
F

THE BOARD AND 
MANAGEMENT BELIEVE 
THE COMPANY IS 
WELL POSITIONED TO 
BUILD ON THE SOLID 
PROGRESS IT HAS MADE 
THROUGHOUT THE 2013 
FINANCIAL YEAR. 
In North America it is anticipated that 
the company will continue to build 
on its base of pay per use revenue 
as a result of the vRad rollout which 
is scheduled to commence in the 
October/November timeframe.  
This will be supplemented by growth 
in transaction numbers from existing 
contracts and any future sales  
the company may make throughout 
the period.

In Australia, the ongoing roll-out of 
the company’s new RIS technology 
platform will continue to cement Pro 
Medicus position as the premium 
provider of Practice Management 
(RIS) systems which the company 
anticipates will lead to further sales of 
this technology.

Key factors predicted to drive growth include:
Expanded geographical 
footprint
The company is looking to further 
build on its presence in North 
America as well as consolidate 
its position in Australia. In North 
America, our strategy of developing 
direct sales has been very successful 
with an increasing percentage of the 
company’s revenue coming from this 
region, a trend we feel will continue in 
the coming year.

Multiple licencing models
Over the past year, the company 
has seen an increase in the pay per 
use licensing model in both Australia 
and North America. We believe this 
will continue to gain momentum 
as more and more clients opt for 
an operational model. This has the 
potential to build growing annuity 
revenue streams to supplement the 
upfront, capital licence model that 
has traditionally been used.

Fully integrated product 
offering
With the ongoing commercialisation 
of Coral our new RIS technology 
platform, we are fulfilling our aim 
of fully integrating our new RIS 
technology platform with our leading 
edge Visage  7.0 suite of products 
thereby creating the first fourth-
generation, end-to-end single-vendor 
‘thin client’ PACS/RIS solution in  
the market. Over the past year,  
we have seen a clear trend in 
Australia where all new sales have 
been for the combined solution 
of Coral and Visage technologies 
providing early confirmation of  
our multi product strategy. 

New Technology
The company will continue the rollout 
of its New Technology RIS Platform. 
This platform, the culmination of 
many years of intense R & D effort 
will see Pro Medicus cement its 
position at the forefront of radiology 
information system (RIS) and 
practice management technology.  
A key feature of this technology is 
the ability for clients to configure 
business-specific workflow and rules 
to suit their needs without the need 
to customize the program, a new 
concept for the radiology industry.

The company will also continue 
to make significant investments in 
R&D for its flagship Visage 7 suite 
of products which it believes will 
continue to differentiate our offering in 
both the 2-D PACS and 3-D advanced 
visualisation space opening up more 
opportunities in a broad range of 
radiology market segments.

12     Annual Report 2013

13    

 
 
CONTENTS

Directors’ Report  ...............................................................................................................16
Auditor’s Independence Declaration  .................................................................................24
Statement of Comprehensive Income  ...............................................................................25
Statement of Financial Position  .........................................................................................26
Statement of Changes in Equity  ........................................................................................27
Statement of Cash Flows  ..................................................................................................28
Notes to the Financial Statements  ....................................................................................29
Note 1   Corporate Information  ......................................................................................29
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies  ...................................................29
Note 2 
Significant Accounting Judgements, Estimates and Assumptions  .................38
Note 3 
Financial Risk Management Objectives and Policies  ......................................39
Note 4 
Operating Segments  ........................................................................................41
Note 5 
Income and Expenses  .....................................................................................43
Note 6 
Income Tax  .......................................................................................................44
Note 7 
Discontinued Operations  .................................................................................45
Note 8 
Note 9 
Earnings per Share ...........................................................................................46
Note 10  Dividends Paid and Proposed  .........................................................................46
Note 11  Cash and Cash Equivalents  .............................................................................47
Note 12  Trade and Other Receivables (Current)  ............................................................48
Inventory  ..........................................................................................................48
Note 13 
Note 14  Plant and Equipment  .......................................................................................49
Note 15 
Intangible Assets  ..............................................................................................50
Note 16   Trade and Other Payables (Current)  .................................................................52
Note 17   Provisions  .........................................................................................................52
Note 18   Contributed Equity and Reserves  ....................................................................52
Note 19   Share based Payment Plan  ..............................................................................53
Note 20   Commitments  ..................................................................................................55
Note 21   Events after the Balance Sheet Date  ...............................................................55
Note 22   Auditors’ Remuneration  ...................................................................................56
Note 23   Key Management Personnel  ............................................................................56
Note 24   Related Party Disclosure  ..................................................................................58
Note 25   Contingencies  ..................................................................................................58
Note 26   Parent Entity Information  .................................................................................59
Directors’ Declaration  ........................................................................................................60
Independent Auditor’s Report  ...........................................................................................62
ASX Additional Information  ...............................................................................................64
Corporate Governance Statement  ....................................................................................65
Corporate Information  .......................................................................................................71

15    

S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S

I

L
A
C
N
A
N
F

I

 
DIRECTORS’ 
REPORT 

THE NAMES AND DETAILS 
OF THE COMPANY’S 
DIRECTORS IN OFFICE 
DURING THE FINANCIAL 
YEAR AND UNTIL THE 
DATE OF THIS REPORT 
ARE AS FOLLOWS:

Peter Terence Kempen 
F.C.A, F.A.I.C.D 
Chairman

Peter Kempen joined Pro Medicus 
as a Director on 12 March 2008. He 
is Chairman of Ivanhoe Grammar 
School and Chairman of Australasian 
Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group. He 
is also a Director of the Yara Pilbara 
group of companies.

Peter has previously been Chairman 
of Patties Food Limited, Chairman 
of Danks Holdings Limited and 
Managing Partner of Ernst & Young 
Corporate Finance Australia.

Peter is a Fellow of the Institute of 
Chartered Accountants in Australia 
and a Fellow of the Australian 
Institute of Company Directors.

Peter became Chairman in August 
2010 before which he served  
as a Non Executive Director of  
the company.

Peter is also Chairman of the  
audit committee.

Roderick Lyle 
LL.B., B.Com, LL.M (Lond), 
MBA (Melb)  
Non Executive Director

Roderick joined Pro Medicus Limited 
as a Director on 23 November 2010. 
He is a Senior Partner of Clayton Utz 
and is former Managing Partner of the 
Melbourne office.

Roderick is a member of the Law 
Institute of Victoria, a member of the 
Law Society of New South Wales and 
a member of the Law Society London. 

Roderick is recognised as one of 
Australia’s leading commercial 
lawyers. He has been a key advisor in 
a large number of significant mergers 
and acquisitions and equity capital 
markets transactions. Roderick also 
serves on the audit committee.

Dr Sam Aaron Hupert 
M.B.B.S.  
Managing Director and  

Chief Executive Officer

Co-founder of Pro Medicus Limited 
in 1983, Sam Hupert is a Monash 
University Medical School graduate 
who commenced General Practice 
in 1980. Realising the significant 
potential for computers in medicine 
he left general practice in late 1984 to 
devote himself full time to managing 
the Group. 

Sam served as CEO from the time he 
co-founded the company until October 
2007 at which time he stepped down 
to become an executive director. Sam 
resumed full time CEO activities in 
October of 2010.

Clayton James Hatch 
CPA 
Chief Financial Officer and 
Company Secetary

Clayton was appointed Company 
Secretary on 1 July 2009.

Clayton has strong experience 
in financial and management 
accounting having worked in a 
Finance role for several years. 
Clayton joined Pro Medicus in June 
2008 and has progressed through 
the company to his current position 
of Chief Financial Officer which he 
assumed on the 1st July 2012.

Anthony Barry Hall 
B.Sc. (Hons), M.Sc. 
Executive Director and  
Technology Director 

Co-founder of Pro Medicus Limited in 
1983, Anthony Hall has been principal 
architect and developer of the core 
software systems. His current role is 
to oversee product development and 
plan the future technical direction of 
the Group.

INTERESTS IN THE SHARES AND OPTIONS OF THE COMPANY

As at the date of this report, the interests of the directors in the shares and options of the Company were:

Ordinary Shares

Options over Ordinary Shares

30,068,500

30,072,660

378,082

140,000

CENTS

1.0

1.0

1.0

NIL

NIL

200,000

200,000

Cents

5.12

5.12

$’000

1,002

1,002

1,002

A. B. Hall

S. A. Hupert

P. T. Kempen

R. Lyle

EARNINGS PER SHARE

Basic earnings per share

Diluted earnings per share

DIVIDENDS

ORDINARY SHARES

Final dividends recommended:

Normal dividend plan

Dividends paid in the year:

Interim for the year

Final dividend for 2012 shown as recommended in the 2012 report:

Normal dividend plan

OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW

Corporate Structure
Pro Medicus Limited is a company 
limited by shares that is incorporated 
and domiciled in Australia. 

Nature of operations and  
principal activities  
The principal activities of the Group 
during the year were the supply of 
product and services to diagnostic 
imaging groups and a range of 
other entities predominately within 
the private medical market. These 
products and services include:

Radiology Information Systems (RIS)

 ▶ Innovative proprietary medical 

software for practice management 
(RIS);

 ▶ Training, installation and professional 

services;

 ▶ After sale support and service 

products;

 ▶ Promedicus.net secure email; and

 ▶ Digital radiology integration products 

Visage PACS

 ▶ Innovative clinical software that 

provides radiologist with advanced 
visualisation capability for viewing 
3-D and 4-D images;

 ▶ PACS/Digital imaging software that 
is sold both direct and to original 
equipment manufacturers (OEM).

 ▶ Training, installation and 
professional services;

 ▶ Support and service products;

The Company undertakes R&D in 
Australia for it Practice Management 
(RIS) and promedicus.net products 
including R&D for Coral, its new 
technology platform.

Its R&D base in Europe is where 
the bulk of the R&D for the Visage 
Imaging product set is carried 
out. The Company has continued 
development of the Visage 7 product 
line throughout the period.

16     Annual Report 2013

17    

 
 
DIRECTORS’ REPORT cont.

REVIEW AND 
RESULTS OF 
OPERATIONS 

Investment Activities
Surplus funds which are held in 
several currencies are invested by 
the Group in a cash management 
account and terms deposits to 
maximise the interest return.

Performance Indicators
Management and the Board  
monitor overall performance,   
from the strategic plan through  
to the performance of the Group  
against operating plans and  
financial budgets.

The Board, together with 
management, have identified key 
performance indicators (KPIs) that 
are used to monitor performance. 
Key management monitor these 
KPIs on a regular basis and Directors 
receive appropriately structured 
board reports for review prior to each 
monthly Board meeting allowing 
them to actively monitor the Group’s 
performance.

Dynamics of the Business
Australia 
The Group employs 28 people in 
Australia who undertake research 
and development of Pro Medicus 
products (RIS) as well as sales and 
service/support functions.

The Group’s Australian revenue was 
marginally above last year’s result 
despite an increasingly competitive 
local market with overall profit being 
affected by increased costs associated 
with the ongoing commercialisation 
and rollout of the Company’s new Coral 
RIS technology platform.

Promedicus.net, the company’s 
e-health offering, continued to hold 
its strong market position despite 
increasing competition.

North America 
The Group employs 8 people in 
North America to fulfil the sales 
marketing and professional services 
roles. Revenue from North America 
increased by 26.9% compared 
to the previous year. This was 
largely attributable to an increase 
in transaction based revenue from 
sales of Visage technology as more 
contracts come on stream as well 
as an increase in Original Equipment 
Manufacturer (OEM) sales.

18     Annual Report 2013

Europe 
Pro Medicus established a presence 
in Europe with the acquisition of 
Visage Imaging GmbH in late January 
2009. The group has 38 employees 
in its Berlin office who undertake 
research and development of Visage 
Imaging products worldwide as well as 
sales, marketing and service/support 
functions for the group’s European 
operations. Revenue from our 
European operations decreased  
by 22.6% compared to the previous 
year due to deteriorating European 
market conditions.

Financials
Full year revenue of the Group from 
continuing operations, decreased 
marginally from $11.38m to $11.37m, 
a decrease of 0.4%.

The result from the underlying 
operations for the year was a loss 
of $0.65m. The underlying loss is 
made up of reported profit after-tax 
of $5.13m, less the after-tax profit 
of $8.61m of Amira and after-tax net 
currency gain of $0.39m, and adding 
back the after-tax impairment expense 
of $3.22m. This result was impacted 
by additional costs, mainly associated 
with the ongoing commercialisation 
and roll out of Coral RIS to the market.

Profit after tax for the period was 
$5.13m an increase of 186.5% from 
the previous year.

The key driver of the profit increase 
was the sale of Amira business in 
July 2012 which generated a one-off 
after-tax profit of $8.45m. This was 
partially offset by a decrease in the 
carrying value of some the company’s 
intangible assets which resulted in an 
after-tax impairment loss of $3.22m. 

Investments for Future 
Performance
The Company will continue to direct 
resources into the development of 
new products and is committed to the 
continued development of Coral, its 
new RIS technology platform as well 
as the ongoing development of the 
Visage Imaging PACS product.

It is anticipated that this strategy of 
ongoing development will continue 
to position Pro Medicus as a market 
leader and enable the group to 
leverage its expanded product 
portfolio and geographical spread. 

The Group remains committed 
to providing staff with access to 
appropriate training and development 

programs, together with the resources 
to complete their duties. 

The directors express their gratitude 
for the efforts of the management 
team and all employees in achieving 
this year’s result.

REVIEW OF FINANCIAL 
CONDITION

Capital Structure
The Company has a sound capital 
structure with a strong financial 
position, with no debt.

Treasury Policy
With the increase in overseas 
operations there is an increased 
currency risk as a consequence of 
contracts written in and cash being 
held in foreign currencies. Whilst 
this is offset to a degree by having 
operations in North America and 
Europe, this change in risk profile has 
been noted by the board and action  
is being taken to manage this risk.

The treasury function, co-ordinated 
within Pro Medicus Limited, is 
limited to maximising interest return 
on surplus funds and managing 
currency risk. The treasury operates 
within policies set by the Board, 
which is responsible for ensuring that 
management’s actions are in line with 
Board policy.

Cash from Operations
Net cash flows from operating 
activities for the current period was 
a positive $3.81m, with receipts 
from customers totalling $11.68m 
compared with payments of $8.26m  
to suppliers and employees. The 
group continued to hold total cash 
assets of $18.02 million and increase 
of 247.21% from last year.

Liquidity and Funding
The Group is cash flow positive, has 
adequate cash reserves and has no 
overdraft facility. Sufficient funds are 
held to finance operations.

Risk Management
The Company takes a proactive 
approach to risk management. The 
Board is responsible for ensuring 
that risks, and also opportunities, 
are identified on a timely basis and 
that the Group’s objectives and 
activities are aligned with the risks and 
opportunities identified by the Board. 

The Company believes that it is crucial 
for all Board members to participate 
in this process, as such the Board has 
not established separate committees 
for areas such as risk management, 
environmental issues, occupational 
health and safety or treasury.

SIGNIFICANT EVENTS 
AFTER THE BALANCE 
DATE 
A Final Dividend of 1.0 cents per share 
has been declared post 1 July. Please 
refer Note 10.

The Board has a number of 
mechanisms in place to ensure 
that management’s objectives and 
activities are aligned with the risks 
identified by the Board. These include 
the following:

 ▶ Board approval of strategic plans, 
which encompass the Company’s 
vision, mission and strategy 
statements, designed to meet 
stakeholder needs and manage 
business risk;

 ▶ Implementation of Board approved 
operating plans and budgets and 
Board monitoring of progress 
against these budgets, including 
the establishment and monitoring 
of KPIs;

 ▶ Overseeing of appropriate backup 
procedures for important company 
data; and

 ▶ Routine review by key executives 

of its established Quality Assurance 
program and corrective action 
recommendations stemming from it. 

Corporate Governance
In recognising the need for the highest 
standards of corporate behaviour and 
accountability, the directors of Pro 
Medicus Limited support and have 
adhered to the principles of good 
corporate governance. Please refer  
to the separate “Corporate 
Governance” section for more details 
of specific policies.

SIGNIFICANT 
CHANGES IN THE 
STATE OF AFFAIRS 
Shareholders’ equity increased by 
31.0% from $16.00m to $20.96m. 
This movement was largely the result 
of the sale of the Amira business, 
offset by the impairment loss during 
the year.

LIKELY 
DEVELOPMENTS AND 
EXPECTED RESULTS 
The Directors anticipate that the 2014 
financial year will see more opportunity 
crystallise for the company due to 
improved prospects in North America 
and the continued commercialisation 
and roll out of Coral, the company’s 
new technology RIS platform.

Key components that are likely 
to affect the performance of the 
company are:

 ▶ Growing interest in the Visage suite 
of products in the North American 
market has resulted in a number 
of sales opportunities that the 
Company is actively pursuing.

 ▶ The ability of the expanded Visage 
product set to address key market 
segments such as large public/
teaching hospitals in addition to  
the private radiology and 
teleradiology markets.

 ▶ The continued adoption of advanced 

visualisation and 3-D capability 
throughout the radiology profession.

 ▶ Increased revenue being generated 
from transaction based contracts 
including the Vrad contract that 
was announced in May which is 
anticipated to come on stream in the 
first half of the 2014 financial year.

 ▶ Improved sales prospects for Coral, 
the company’s New Technology RIS 
platform as the rollout of this new 
platform continues.

As a result, it is anticipated that 
the 2014 financial year will show 
continued improvement in profits. 
However, this is dependant on 
many market factors over which the 
directors have limited or no control.

ENVIRONMENTAL 
REGULATION AND 
PERFORMANCE 
The Group has no identified risk with 
regard to environmental regulations 
currently in force. There have been  
no known breaches by the Group of 
any regulations.

SHARE OPTIONS 

Un-issued Shares
As at the date of this report, there 
were 1,675,000 un-issued ordinary 
shares under options refer to Note 19 
of the financial statements for further 
details of the options outstanding.

Option holders do not have any right, 
by virtue of the option, to participate in 
any share issue of the Company.

Shares Issued as a Result 
of the Exercise of Options
During the financial year, no share 
options were exercised by ex-
employees. During the financial year 
no share options expired. No directors 
or key management personnel in the 
current year have exercised any option 
to acquire fully paid ordinary shares in 
Pro Medicus Limited. 

INDEMNIFICATION 
AND INSURANCE  
OF DIRECTORS  
AND OFFICERS 
During the year, Pro Medicus Limited 
indemnified Clayton Utz and each 
one or more of the past, present or 
future partners of Clayton Utz (other 
than Mr. Lyle) against any liability 
(including a liability incurred by 
Clayton Utz to pay legal costs) arising 
out of Mr. Lyle’s activities as  
a Director of Pro Medicus Limited.

During or since the financial year, 
the Company has paid premiums in 
respect of a contract for Directors’ & 
Officers’/Company Re-Imbursement 
Liability insurance for directors, 
officers and Pro Medicus Limited 
for costs incurred in defending 
proceedings against them.

Disclosure of the amount of insurance 
and the terms of this cover is 
prohibited by the insurance policy.

19    

DIRECTORS’ REPORT cont.

REMUNERATION 
REPORT (audited)
This remuneration report for the 
year ended 30 June 2013 outlines 
the remuneration arrangements of 
the Group in accordance with the 
requirements of the Corporations 
Act 2001 and its Regulations.  
This information has been audited 
as required by section 308(3C) of 
the Act.

The remuneration report details 
the remuneration arrangements for 
key management personnel (KMP) 
who are defined as those persons 
having authority and responsibility 
for planning, directing and controlling 
the major activities of the Company 
and the Group, directly or indirectly, 
including any director (whether 
executive or otherwise) of the Group.

For the purposes of this report, the 
term ‘executive’ includes the Chief 
Executive Officer (CEO), executive 
directors and other senior executives 
of the Group.

Remuneration committee
Remuneration and nomination 
issues are handled at the full Board 
level. The Board due to the small

number of directors decided this. 
No Committees for these functions 
have been established at this time.

Board members, as per groupings 
detailed below, are responsible 
for determining and reviewing 
compensation arrangements.

In order to maintain good corporate 
governance the Non-Executive 
Directors assume responsibility 
for determining and reviewing 
compensation arrangements for the 
Executive Directors of the Group. 
The Executive Directors in turn 
are responsible for determining 
and reviewing the compensation 
arrangements for the Non-Executive 
Directors. The CEO, in conjunction 
with the full Board reviews the terms 
of employment for all executives.

The assessment considers the 
appropriateness of the nature and 
amount of remuneration of such 
executives on a periodic basis by 
reference to relevant employment 
market conditions with the overall 
objective of ensuring maximum 
stakeholder benefit from the 
retention of a high quality Board  
and executive team. 

(i) Non – Executive Directors

Peter Terence Kempen

Chairman 

Roderick Lyle 

Director (non-executive) 

(ii) Executive Directors

Dr Sam Aaron Hupert

Managing Director and CEO

Anthony Barry Hall

Technology Director

(ii) Other Executives

Danny Tauber

Malte Westerhoff

General Manager – Pro Medicus 
Limited

Managing Director – Visage Imaging 
GmbH 

Brad Levin

General Manager – Visage Imaging Inc

Remuneration philosophy
The performance of the group 
depends upon the quality of its 
Directors and Executives. To prosper, 
the Company must attract, motivate 
and retain highly skilled directors and 
executives.

To this end, the Company provides 
competitive rewards to attract high 
calibre Executives.

Remuneration structure
In accordance with best practice 
corporate governance, the structure 
of Non-Executive Director and 
Executive’s remuneration is separate 
and distinct.

Non-Executive Director 
remuneration
Objective
The Board seeks to set aggregate 
remuneration at a level which 
provides the Company with the 
ability to attract and retain Directors 
of the highest calibre, whilst 
incurring a cost which is acceptable 
to shareholders.

Structure
The Constitution and the ASX 
Listing Rules specify that the 
aggregate remuneration of Non-
Executive Directors shall be 
determined from time to time by 
a general meeting. An amount not 
exceeding the amount determined is 
then divided between the Directors 
as agreed. The latest determination 
was at the Annual General Meeting 
held on 4 November 2005 when 
shareholders approved an aggregate 
remuneration of $500,000 per year.

The amount of the aggregate 
remuneration sought to be approved 
by shareholders and the manner 
in which it is apportioned amongst 
Directors is reviewed annually. The 
Board considers fees paid to Non-
Executive Directors of comparable 
companies when undertaking the 
annual review process.

Each Director receives a fee for 
being a Director of the Company. No 
additional fee is paid for time spent 
on Audit Committee business.

Non-Executive Directors have long 
been encouraged by the Board 
to hold shares in the Company 
(purchased by the Director on 
market). It is considered good 
governance for the Directors to 
have a stake in the Company on 
whose board they sit. The Non-
Executive Directors of the Company 
participate in the Employee Share 
Incentive Scheme [Option based] 
which was established in 2000 to 
provide incentive for participants.

The remuneration of Non-Executive 
Directors for the period ending  
30 June 2013 is detailed in Table 1 
of this report.

Executives  
(including Executive 
Directors remuneration)
Objective
The Group aims to reward 
Executives with a level and mix of 
remuneration commensurate with 
their position and responsibilities 
within the Group and so as to:

 ▶ align the interests of Executives 

with those of shareholders;

 ▶ ensure total remuneration is 

competitive by market standards.

Structure
Employment Contracts have been 
entered into with all Executives of 
the Group. Details of these contracts 
are provided on page 22.

Remuneration consists predominately 
of fixed remuneration. Variable 
remuneration is provided occasionally 
at the Board’s discretion including 
both short term incentives (STI) and 
long term incentives (LTI).

The Company does not have a policy 
regarding Executives entering into 
contracts to hedge their exposure to 

share options granted as part of their 
remuneration package.

Fixed Remuneration
Objective
The level of fixed remuneration is 
set so as to provide a base level 
of remuneration which is both 
appropriate to the position and is 
competitive in the market.

Fixed remuneration is reviewed 
annually and the process consisting 
of a review of group wide, business 
and individual performance, relevant 
comparative remuneration in the 
market and internal and, where 
appropriate, external advice on 
policies and practices. As noted 
above, the company conducting the 
review has access to external advice 
independent of management.

Executives, including Executive 
Directors are given the opportunity 
to receive their fixed (primary) 
remuneration in a variety of forms 
including cash and fringe benefits 
such as motor vehicles and expense 
payment plans. It is intended that 
the manner of payment chosen will 
be optimal for the recipient without 
creating undue cost for the group.

The fixed remuneration is detailed in 
Table 1 of this report.

Variable Remuneration  
– Long Term Incentive (LTI)
Roderick Lyle was granted options 
in 2011-12 under the Employee 
Share Option Scheme with a 5 year 
vesting period.

A long term incentive plan was 
established during 2011-12 whereby 
Senior Executives of Group were 
offered performance rights over 
the ordinary shares of Pro Medicus 
Limited. The performance rights, 
issued for nil consideration, are 

offered for a 5 year period and 
vest 3 years after granting date 
on completion of service. This 
long term incentive plan includes 
performance hurdles related to 
profitability which is set on an 
annualised basis by the Board.

Variable Pay  
– Short Term Incentive (STI)
Short term incentives in the form of 
cash bonuses were paid to key staff 
based on a mix of company based 
and personal performance targets.

STI bonus for 2013
For the 2013 financial year, the total 
amount of STI cash bonus either 
paid or accrued at year end was 
$202,898. The maximum amount 
payable under STI was $247,598.

Key Performance Indicators
Actual STI payments granted to 
key staff depended on the extent 
to which specific targets set at 
the time of employment were met. 
The targets consist of a number 
of Key Performance Indicators 
(KPIs) covering both financial (Sales 
Targets) and non-financial measures 
of performance.

Shareholder Returns
The directors are confident that the 
holdings of reserve cash is sufficient 
to underpin the development and 
expansion needs of the company 
as the business looks to increase its 
penetration of existing markets.

The company has maintained 
cash holdings and the increased 
return on net assets and equity as 
shown in the table below reflects 
the increased level of profit in the 
current period.

Basic earnings per share — reported (cents)

Return on assets (%)

Return on equity (%)

Dividend payout ratio (%) — normal dividend plan

Dividend payout ratio (%) — total dividend 

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

5.1

25.6

24.2

39.7

39.7

1.8

11.3

11.2

84.0

84.0

0.5

3.0

3.3

0.0

0.0

3.9

23.8

23.5

51.2

51.2

5.1

33.4

38.5

59.0

59.0

Available franking credits ($’000)

1,641

2,638

2,921

4,821

4,042

20     Annual Report 2013

21    

DIRECTORS’ REPORT cont.

Employment Contracts
Executive Directors
Executive Service Contracts, on 
similar terms and conditions, have 
been prepared for all Executive 
Directors of the Company. 

These agreements provide the 
following major terms:

 ▶ Each executive will receive a 

remuneration package per annum 
which is to be reviewed annually;

 ▶ The agreements protect the 

Company and Group’s confidential 
information and provide that any 
inventions or discoveries of an 
executive become the property of 
the Group;

 ▶ Non-competition during 

employment and for a period of 12 
months thereafter; and

 ▶ Termination by the Company on 
six months notice or payment of 
six months remuneration in lieu of 
notice or a combination of both 
(or without notice or payment in 
lieu in the event of misconduct or 
other specified circumstances). The 
agreements may be terminated by 
the executives on the giving of six 
months notice.

Executives (excluding 
Executive Directors)
All Executives have rolling contracts. 
The Group may terminate the 
Executive’s employment agreement 
by providing six months written 
notice or providing payment in lieu 
of the notice period (based on the 
fixed component of the Executive’s 
remuneration). The Group may 
terminate the contract at any time 
without notice if serious misconduct 
has occurred. Where termination 
with cause occurs the Executive 
is only entitled to that portion of 
remuneration that is fixed, and only 
up to the date of termination. On 
termination with cause any unvested 
options will immediately be forfeited.

Remuneration of key management personnel of the company and the Group
Table 1: Remuneration of key management personnel for the year ended 30 June 2013.

SHORT-TERM

NON–
MONETARY 
BENEFITS

POST 
EMPLOYMENT

SUPER- 
ANNUATION

LONG 
TERM

LONG 
SERVICE 
LEAVE

SALARY & 
FEES

CASH 
BONUS

SHARE-BASED 
PAYMENT

TOTAL

TOTAL 
PERFORMANCE 
RELATED %

PERFORMANCE 
RIGHTS

OPTIONS

30 JUNE 2013

Directors

P T Kempen

47,720

S A Hupert

255,000

A B Hall

R. Lyle

255,000

45,872

–

–

–

–

Executives

D Tauber

301,871

35,000

M Westerhoff

295,323 138,666

B Levin

185,136

29,232

8,280

–

–

–

–

–

–

24,000

25,000

25,000

4,128

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

80,000

280,000

280,000

11,270

61,270

–

–

–

–

13,129

4,817

9,000

4,606

368,423

2,209

–

–

–

10,500

1,415

448,113

–

–

214,368

9.5%

30.9%

13.6%

1,385,922 202,898

8,280

93,466

4,817

19,500

17,291 1,732,174

Compensation options granted, vested and exercised during the year as part of 
remuneration 
126,000 shares with a fair value of $31,500 ($0.25 per performance right) were granted as performance rights to 
Malte Westerhoff with a grant date of 24 September 2012. The performance rights have a 3 year vesting period and 
are automatically exercised upon completion of the vesting period.

108,000 shares with a fair value of $27,000 ($0.25 per performance right) were granted as performance rights to 
Danny Tauber with a grant date of 24 September 2012. The performance rights have a 3 year vesting period and are 
automatically exercised upon completion of the vesting period.

22     Annual Report 2013

Table 2: Remuneration of key management personnel for the year ended 30 June 2012

SHORT-TERM

NON–
MONETARY 
BENEFITS

POST 
EMPLOYMENT

SUPER- 
ANNUATION

LONG 
TERM

LONG 
SERVICE 
LEAVE

SALARY & 
FEES

CASH 
BONUS

SHARE-BASED 
PAYMENT

TOTAL

TOTAL 
PERFORMANCE 
RELATED %

SHARES

OPTIONS

30 JUNE 2012

Directors

P T Kempen

47,924

115,000

115,000

45,872

S A Hupert

A B Hall

R. Lyle

Executives

D Tauber

301,871

M Westerhoff

232,412

B Levin

162,917

1,020,996

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

-

8,076

–

–

–

–

–

–

24,000

25,000

25,000

4,128

–

–

–

–

13,129

4,830

2,274

–

–

–

8,076

93,531

4,830

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

-

1,040

81,040

–

–

140,000

140,000

23,498

73,498

11,554

331,384

3,060

237,746

–

162,917

39,152

1,166,585

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

Compensation options granted, vested and exercised during the year as part of remuneration 
200,000 shares with a fair value of $45,116 ($0.23 per option) were granted as options to Roderick Lyle with a grant 
date of 18 November 2011. The share options have an exercise price of $0.55. The options have a first exercise date 
of 18 November 2012 and can be exercised at anytime through to expiry date of 18 November 2021. The options 
vest 20% each year over a 5 year period on completion of service.

For details of the valuation of options, including models and assumptions used please refer to Note 19.

DIRECTORS’ MEETINGS
The numbers of meetings of directors (including meetings of committees of directors) held during the year and the 
number of meetings attended by each director were as follows:

DIRECTORS’ MEETINGS

ELIGIBLE TO ATTEND

AUDIT COMMITTEE

ELIGIBLE TO ATTEND

Number of meetings held:

Number of meetings attended:

P. T. Kempen

R. Lyle

A. B. Hall

S. A. Hupert

12

12

12

12

12

2

2

2

2

2

12

12

12

12

2

2

2

2

Committee membership
As at the 30 June 2013, the company had an Audit Committee comprising the 2 Non-Executive Directors and  
2 Executive Directors.

ROUNDING
The amounts contained in this report 
and in the financial report have been 
rounded to the nearest $1,000 (where 
rounding is applicable) under the 
option available to the Company 
under ASIC Class Order 98/0100. 
The Company is an entity to which 
the Class Order applies.
AUDITOR 
INDEPENDENCE 
AND NON–AUDIT 
SERVICES
The directors received a declaration 
from the auditor of Pro Medicus 
Limited (refer page 24).

NON–AUDIT SERVICES
The following non–audit services were provided by the company’s auditor, 
Ernst & Young. The directors are satisfied that the provision of non–audit 
services is compatible with the general standard of independence for the 
auditors imposed by the Corporations Act. The nature and scope of the non–
audit service provided means that auditor independence is not compromised.

Ernst & Young received the following amount for the provision of non–audit services:
Professional services rendered in respect to taxation matters 
$64,080
Signed in accordance with a resolution of the Directors.

P T Kempen 
Director 
Melbourne, 23 August 2013

23    

 
DIRECTORS’ REPORT cont.

AUDITOR’S INDEPENDENCE
DECLARATION

Ernst & Young 
8 Exhibition Street 
Melbourne  VIC  3000   Australia 
GPO  Box 67  Melbourne  VIC  3001 

Tel: +61  3 9288  8000 
Fax:  +61  3 8650  7777 
ey.com/au 

Auditor's Independence Declaration to  the  Directors of  Pro Medicus 
Limited 

In relation to our  audit of the  financial report  of  Pro  Medicus  Limited for  the  financial year  ended 
30  June 2013, to the best of my  knowledge and  belief,  there have  been no  contraventions of  the 
auditor independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 or  any  applicable code  of 
professional conduct. 

Ernst & Young 

David  Petersen 
Partner 
Melbourne 

23  August 2013 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF 
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

CONSOLIDATED

FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2013 

Continuing Operations

Revenue

Finance Revenue
Revenue

Cost of Sales
Gross Profit

Other Income/(Expenses)

Accounting and Secretarial Fees

Advertising and Public Relations

Depreciation and Amortisation

Insurance

Legal Costs

Operating Lease Expense — minimum lease payments

Impairment Expense

Other Expenses

Salaries and Employee Benefits Expense

Travel and Accommodation
Profit/(loss) for the year from continuing operations before tax

Income tax benefit/(expense)
Profit/(loss) for the year from continuing operations

Discontinued operations

Profit/(loss) after tax for the year from discontinued operations
Profit for the year

Other Comprehensive Income

Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit and loss

Foreign Currency translation

Other comprehensive income for the period
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOR THE YEAR, NET OF TAX

Earnings per share (cents per share)

Basic for net profit for the year 

Diluted for net profit for the year

Earnings per share for continued operations (cents per share)

Basic for net profit for the year from continued operations

Diluted for net profit for the year from continued operations

NOTES

5

6(a)

6(b)

15 (iii)

6(b)

7

8

18

9

9

2013

$’000

11,154

220

11,374

(473)

10,901

686

(440)

(670)

(2,948)

(362)

(108)

(338)

(4,600)

(604)
(5,915)

(504)

(4,902)

1,425

(3,477)

8,608

5,131

1,777
1,777
6,908

5.12¢

5.12¢

(3.5¢)

(3.5¢)

2012

$’000

11,313

66

11,379

(546)

10,833

812

(419)

(601)

(2,936)

(332)

(127)

(360)

–

(55)

(5,379)

(417)

1,019

(263)

756

1,035

1,791

(533)

(533)

1,258

1.8¢

1.8¢

0.8¢

0.8¢

24     Annual Report 2013

25    

A member firm of Ernst & Young  Global Limited 

Liability limited by a  scheme approved under  Professional Standards Legis lation 

12 

	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
 
	
  
	
  
 
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT  
OF FINANCIAL POSITION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT  
OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

AS AT 30 JUNE 2013

ASSETS

Current Assets

Cash and cash equivalents
Trade and other receivables
Income tax receivable
Inventories
Prepayments

Assets classified held for sale
Total Current Assets

Non-current Assets

Deferred tax asset
Plant and equipment
Intangible assets
Total Non-current Assets 
TOTAL ASSETS

LIABILITIES 
Current Liabilities
Trade and other payables
Income tax payable
Provisions

Liabilities directly associated with the assets classified as held for sale
Total Current Liabilities 
Non-current Liabilities
Deferred tax liabilities
Provisions
Total Non-current Liabilities 
TOTAL LIABILITIES
NET ASSETS

EQUITY
Contributed equity
Share Reserve
Foreign Currency Translation Reserve
Retained earnings
TOTAL EQUITY

NOTES

11
12

13

7
14
15

16

17

7
17

18
18
18
18

CONSOLIDATED

2012

$’000

5,193
1,692
135
101
157
7,278
2,647
9,925

1,596
356
11,267
13,219
23,144

1,708
-
1,224
2,932
945
3,877

3,234
31
3,265
7,142
16,002

327
172
(1,681)
17,184
16,002

2013

$’000

18,023
2,648
–
113
101
20,885
–
20,885

1,089
334
7,110
8,533
29,418

1,046
4,176
1,310
6,532
–
6,532

1,903
24
1,927
8,459
20,959

327
226
96
20,310
20,959

FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2013

At 1 July 2011

Profit for the year

Other comprehensive income

Total comprehensive income for the period

Transaction with owners in their capacity as owners

Share Based Payment

Share Bay-Back

Dividends

At 30 June 2012

ISSUED 
CAPITAL

$’000

330 

SHARE 
RESERVE

$’000

122

CONSOLIDATED

FOREIGN CURRENCY 
TRANSLATION 
RESERVE

RETAINED 
EARNINGS

TOTAL 
EQUITY

$’000

$’000

$’000

(1,148)

15,894

15,198

–

–

–

–

(3)

–

–

–

–

50

–

–

–

(533)

(533)

–

–

–

1,791

1,791

–

(533)

1,791

1,258

–

–

50

(3)

(501)

(501)

327

172

(1,681)

17,184

16,002

At 1 July 2012

327

172

(1,681)

17,184

16,002

Profit for the year

Other comprehensive income

Total comprehensive income for the period

Transaction with owners in their capacity as owners

Share Based Payment

Dividends

At 30 June 2013

–

–

–

–

–

327

–

–

–

54

–

226

–

5,131

5,131

1,777

1,777

–

1,777

5,131

6,908

–

–

96

–

54

(2,005)

(2,005)

20,310

20,959

26     Annual Report 2013

27    

 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT  
OF CASH FLOWS

NOTES TO THE  
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2013

NOTES

Cash flows from operating activities

Receipts from customers 

Payments to suppliers and employees 

Income tax (paid)/refunded 
Net cash flows from operating activities

Cash flows from investing activities

Capitalised Development Costs 

Interest received

Net inflow from sale of Amira, net of cash disposed

Purchase of plant and equipment

Proceeds from disposal of plant & equipment

Net cash flows used in investing activities

Cash flows from financing activities

Payment of dividends on ordinary shares
Net cash flows used in financing activities

Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

Net foreign exchange differences

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

11

15

8

14

14

10

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

11

CONSOLIDATED

2013
$’000

11,681 

(8,260) 

392 

3,813 

(3,239)

220

13,883

(137)

7

10,734

(2,005)

(2,005)

12,542

288

5,193

18,023

2012
$’000

16,416

(8,716)

(1,824)

5,876

(3,354)

66

–
(129)

11

(3,406)

(501)

(501)

1,969

(31)

3,255

5,193

1. CORPORATE 

INFORMATION
  The financial report of Pro 

Medicus Limited (the Company) 
for the year ended 30 June 
2013 was authorised for issue in 
accordance with a resolution of 
directors on 23 August 2013.
  Pro Medicus Limited is a for 

profit company limited by shares 
incorporated in Australia whose 
shares are publicly traded on the 
Australian Securities Exchange.
  The nature of the operations and 

principal activities of the Group are 
described in the Directors’ Report.

2. SUMMARY OF 
SIGNIFICANT  
ACCOUNTING 
POLICIES

(a)  Basis of Preparation
The financial report is a 
general-purpose financial 
report, which has been 
prepared in accordance 
with the requirements of 
the Corporations Act 2001, 

Australian Accounting 
Standards and other 
authoritative pronouncements 
of the Australian Accounting 
Standards board. The financial 
report has also been prepared 
on a historical cost basis.
The financial report is presented 
in Australian dollars and all 
values are rounded to the 
nearest thousand dollars ($000) 
unless otherwise stated.

(b)  Statement of compliance 

with IFRS 
The financial report complies with 
Australian Accounting Standards 
and International Financial 
Reporting Standards (IFRS) 
as issued by the International 
Accounting Standards Board. 

(c)  New accounting standards 

and interpretations 

(i)  Changes in Accounting policy  

and disclosures

The accounting polices adopted are 
consistent with those of the previous 
financial year except as follows:

The Group has adopted the following 
new and amended Australian 
Accounting Standards and AASB 
Interpretations as of 1 July 2012. 
Adoption of these standards did 
not have any effect on the financial 
position or performance of the Group.
AASB 2011–9 — Amendments to 
Australian Accounting Standards 
— Presentation of Other 
Comprehensive Income (AASB  1, 
5, 7, 101, 112, 120, 121, 132, 133, 
134, 1039 & 1049)  
This  standard requires entities  to 
group  items  presented in  other  
comprehensive  income   on  the  
basis  of  whether  they  might  be  
reclassified subsequently to profit or 
loss and those that will not:

(ii)  Accounting Standards and  

Interpretation issued but  not 
yet  effective

Australian Accounting Standards and  
Interpretations that have  recently been 
issued or amended but are  not yet 
effective have  not been adopted by 
the  Group  for the  annual reporting  
period  ending  30 June 2013. These 
are outlined in the table below.

REFERENCE

TITLE

SUMMARY

AASB 10

Consolidated 
Financial 
Statements

AASB 12

Disclosure of 
Interests in 
Other Entities

AASB 10 establishes a new control model that 
applies to all entities.  It replaces parts of AASB 127 
Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements 
dealing  with the accounting for consolidated 
financial statements and  UIG-112
Consolidation — Special Purpose Entities.
The new control model broadens the situations 
when an entity is considered to be controlled by 
another entity and includes new guidance for
applying the model to specific situations, including 
when acting as a manager may give control, the 
impact of potential  voting rights and when holding 
less  than a majority voting rights may give control.
Consequential amendments were also made to 
this and other standards via AASB 2011–7 and 
AASB 2012–10.

AASB 12 includes all disclosures relating to an 
entity’s  interests in subsidiaries, joint arrangements, 
associates and structured entities. New disclosures 
have  been introduced about  the judgments made 
by management to determine whether control 
exists, and to require summarised information about  
joint arrangements, associates, structured entities 
and subsidiaries with non- controlling interests.

IMPACT 
ON GROUP 
FINANCIAL 
REPORT

APPLICATION 
DATE FOR 
GROUP

No impact

1 July 2013

APPLICATION 
DATE OF 
STANDARD

1 January 
2013

1 January 
2013

No impact

1 July 2013

28     Annual Report 2013

29    

 
 
 
 
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS cont.

REFERENCE

TITLE

SUMMARY

AASB 13

Fair Value 
Measurement

AASB 
119

Employee 
Benefits

AASB 
2012-2

AASB 
2012-5

AASB 
2012-9

Amendments 
to Australian 
Accounting 
Standards – 
Disclosures 
– Offsetting 
Financial Assets 
and Financial 
Liabilities

Amendments 
to Australian 
Accounting 
Standards 
arising from 
Annual 
Improvements 
2009–2011 
Cycle

Amendments 
to AASB 1048 
arising from 
the withdrawal 
of Australian 
Interpretation 
1039

AASB 13 establishes a single source of guidance 
for determining the fair value of assets and 
liabilities. AASB 13 does not change when an entity 
is required to use fair value, but rather, provides 
guidance on how to determine fair value when fair 
value is required or permitted. Application of this 
definition may result in different fair values being 
determined for the relevant assets.
AASB 13 also expands the disclosure requirements 
for all assets or liabilities carried at fair value. This 
includes information about the assumptions made 
and the qualitative impact of those assumptions on 
the fair value determined.
Consequential amendments were also made to 
other standards via AASB 2011-8.

The main change introduced by this standard is to 
revise the accounting for defined benefit plans. The 
amendment removes the options for accounting 
for the liability, and requires that the liabilities 
arising from such plans is recognized in full with 
actuarial gains and losses being recognized in other 
comprehensive income. It also revised the method 
of calculating the return on plan assets.
The revised standard changes the definition of 
short-term employee benefits. The distinction 
between short-term and other long-term employee 
benefits is now based on whether the benefits are 
expected to be settled wholly within 12 months after 
the reporting date.
Consequential amendments were also made  
to other standards via AASB 2011-10.

AASB 2012-2 principally amends AASB 7 Financial 
Instruments: Disclosures to require disclosure of the 
effect or potential effect of netting arrangements, 
including rights of set- off associated with the 
entity’s recognised financial assets and recognised 
financial liabilities, on the entity’s financial position, 
when all the offsetting criteria of AASB 132 are  
not met.

AASB 2012-5 makes amendments resulting  
from the 2009-2011 Annual Improvements Cycle. 
The Standard addresses a range of improvements, 
including the following:
 ▶ repeat application of AASB 1 is permitted  

(AASB 1); and

 ▶ clarification of the comparative information 

requirements when an entity provides a third 
balance sheet (AASB 101 Presentation of 
Financial Statements).

AASB 2012-9 amends AASB 1048
Interpretation of Standards to evidence  
the withdrawal of Australian Interpretation  
1039 Substantive Enactment of Major Tax Bills  
in Australia.

APPLICATION 
DATE FOR 
GROUP

1 July 2013

APPLICATION 
DATE OF 
STANDARD

1 January 
2013

IMPACT 
ON GROUP 
FINANCIAL 
REPORT

The Group 
will amend 
the future 
financial 
reports to 
comply with 
AASB 13

1 July 2013

1 January 
2013

The Group 
will amend 
the future 
financial 
reports to 
comply with 
AASB 119

1 January 
2013

No impact

1 July 2013

1 January 
2013

No impact

1 July 2013

1 January 
2013

No impact

1 July 2013

IMPACT 
ON GROUP 
FINANCIAL 
REPORT

APPLICATION 
DATE FOR 
GROUP

No impact

1 July 2014

APPLICATION 
DATE OF 
STANDARD

1 January 
2014

REFERENCE

TITLE

SUMMARY

Amendments 
to Australian 
Accounting 
Standards 
– Offsetting 
Financial Assets 
and Financial 
Liabilities

AASB 2012-3 adds application guidance to 
AASB 132 Financial Instruments: Presentation 
to address inconsistencies identified in applying 
some of the offsetting criteria of AASB 132, 
including clarifying the meaning of “currently 
has a legally enforceable right of set-off” and 
that some gross settlement systems may be 
considered equivalent to net settlement.

AASB 
2012-3

AASB 
2011-4

Amendments 
to Australian 
Accounting 
Standards 
to Remove 
Individual Key 
Management 
Personnel 
Disclosure 
Requirements 
[AASB 124]

This amendment deletes from AASB 124 
individual key management personnel disclosure 
requirements for disclosing entities that are not 
companies. It also removes the individual KMP 
disclosure requirements for all disclosing entities 
in relation to equity holdings, loans and other 
related party transactions.

1 January 
2013

1 July 2013

The Group 
will amend 
the future 
financial 
reports to 
comply 
with AASB 
2011-4

1 January 
2015

No impact

1 July 2015

AASB 9

Financial 
Instruments

AASB 9 includes requirements for the classification 
and measurement of financial assets. It was further 
amended by AASB 2010-7 to reflect amendments 
to the accounting for financial liabilities.
These requirements improve and simplify the 
approach for classification and measurement of 
financial assets compared with the requirements of 
AASB 139. The main changes are described below.
(a)  Financial assets that are debt instruments 

will be classified based on (1) the objective of 
the entity’s business model for managing the 
financial assets; (2) the characteristics of the 
contractual cash flows.

(b) Allows an irrevocable election on initial 

recognition to present gains and losses on 
investments in equity instruments that are not 
held for trading in other comprehensive income. 
Dividends in respect of these investments that 
are a return on investment can be recognised 
in profit or loss and there is no impairment or 
recycling on disposal of the instrument.
(c)  Financial assets can be designated and 

measured at fair value through profit or loss 
at initial recognition if doing so eliminates 
or significantly reduces a measurement or 
recognition inconsistency that would arise from 
measuring assets or liabilities, or recognising the 
gains and losses on them, on different bases.
(d) Where the fair value option is used for financial 

liabilities the change in fair value is to be 
accounted for as follows:
 ▶ The change attributable to changes in  

credit risk are presented in other 
comprehensive income (OCI)

 ▶ The remaining change is presented in  

profit or loss

Further amendments were made by AASB 
2012–6 which amends the mandatory effective date 
to annual reporting periods beginning on or after 
1 January 2015. AASB 2012-6 also modifies the 
relief from restating prior periods by amending AASB 
7 to require additional disclosures on transition to 
AASB 9 in some circumstances.
Consequential amendments were also made 
to other standards as a result of AASB 9, 
introduced by AASB 2009-11 and superseded  
by AASB 2010-7 and 2010-10.

30     Annual Report 2013

31    

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS cont.

(d) Basis of consolidation

The consolidated financial 
statements comprise the 
financial statements of Pro 
Medicus Limited and its 
subsidiaries as at 30 June each 
year (the Group).

Subsidiaries are all those entities 
over which the Group has the 
power to govern the financial 
and operating policies so as 
to obtain benefits from their 
activities. The existence and 
effect of potential voting rights 
that are currently exercisable or 
convertible are considered when 
assessing whether a Group 
controls another entity.

The financial statements of 
the subsidiaries are prepared 
for the same reporting period 
as the parent company, using 
consistent accounting policies. 
In preparing the consolidated 
financial statements, all 
intercompany balances and 
transactions, income and 
expenses and profit and losses 
resulting from intragroup 
transactions have been 
eliminated in full.

Subsidiaries are fully 
consolidated from the date 
on which control is obtained 
by the Group and cease to be 
consolidated from the date on 
which control is transferred out 
of the Group.

The acquisition of subsidiaries 
is accounted for using 
the acquisition method of 
accounting. The acquisition 
method of accounting involves 
recognising at acquisition date, 
separately from goodwill, the 
identifiable assets acquired, 
the liabilities assumed and any 
non-controlling interest in the 
acquiree. The identifiable assets 
acquired and the liabilities 
assumed are measured at their 
acquisition date fair values.

The difference between the 
above items and the fair value 
of the consideration (including 
the fair value of any pre- existing 
investment in the acquiree) 
is goodwill or a discount on 
acquisition.

A change in the ownership 
interest of a subsidiary that does 
not result in a loss of control, 
is accounted for as an equity 
transaction.

Non-controlling interests are 
allocated their share of net 
profit after tax in the statement 
of comprehensive income and 
are presented within equity in 
the consolidated statement of 
financial position, separately 
from the equity of the owners of 
the parent.

Losses are attributed to the non-
controlling interest even if that 
results in a deficit balance. 

If the Group loses control over a 
subsidiary, it

 – Derecognises the assets 
(including goodwill) and 
liabilities of the subsidiary.

 – Derecognises the carrying 

amount of any non–controlling 
interest.

 – Derecognises the cumulative 

translation differences, 
recorded in equity.

 – Recognises the fair value of 
the consideration received.

 – Recognises the fair value of 
any investment retained.

 – Recognises any surplus or 

deficit in profit or loss.

 – Reclassifies the parent’s 
share of components 
previously recognised in other 
comprehensive income to 
profit or loss.

(e) Business combinations

Business combinations are 
accounted for using the 
acquisition method. The 
consideration transferred in a 
business combination shall be 
measured at fair value, which 
shall be calculated as the sum of 
the acquisition date fair values 
of the assets transferred by the 
acquirer, the liabilities incurred by 
the acquirer to former owners of 
the acquiree and the equity issued 
by the acquirer, and the amount 
of any non–controlling interest in 
the acquiree. For each business 
combination, the acquirer 

measures the non–controlling 
interest in the acquiree either at 
fair value or at the proportionate 
share of the acquiree’s identifiable 
net assets. Acquisition–related 
costs are expensed as incurred.

When the Group acquires a 
business, it assesses the financial 
assets and liabilities assumed 
for appropriate classification and 
designation in accordance with 
the contractual terms, economic 
conditions, the Group’s operating 
or accounting policies and other 
pertinent conditions as at the 
acquisition date. 

If the business combination is 
achieved in stages, the acquisition 
date fair value of the acquirer’s 
previously held equity interest in 
the acquiree is remeasured at fair 
value as at the acquisition date 
through profit or loss.

Any contingent consideration to 
be transferred by the acquirer 
will be recognised at fair value at 
the acquisition date. Subsequent 
changes to the fair value of the 
contingent consideration which is 
deemed to be an asset or liability 
will be recognised in accordance 
with AASB 139 either in profit or 
loss or in other comprehensive 
income. If the contingent 
consideration is classified as 
equity, it shall not be remeasured.

(f)  Operating segments

An operating segment is a 
component of an entity that 
engages in business activities 
from which it may earn revenues 
and incur expenses (including 
revenues and expenses relating 
to transactions with other 
components of the same entity), 
whose operating results are 
regularly reviewed by the entity’s 
chief operating decision maker to 
make decisions about resources 
to be allocated to the segment 
and assess its performance 
and for which discrete financial 
information is available. This 
includes start up operations 
which are yet to earn revenues. 

Management will also consider 
other factors in determining 
operating segments such as the 
existence of a line manager and 
the level of segment information 
presented to the board of directors.

Operating segments have been 
identified based on the information 
provided to the chief operating 
decision makers – being the 
executive management team.

The group aggregates two or more 
operating segments when they have 
similar economic characteristics and 
the segments are similar in each of 
the following respects:

 ▶ Nature of the products and services

 ▶ Type or class of customer for the 

products and services

 ▶ Nature of the regulatory environment

Operating segments that meet the 
quantitative criteria as prescribed 
by AASB 8 are reported separately. 
However, an operating segment 
that does not meet the quantitative 
criteria is still reported separately 
where information about the 
segment would be useful to users 
of the financial statements.

Information about other business 
activities and operating segments 
that are below the quantitative 
criteria are combined and disclosed 
in a separate category for “all  
other segments”.

(g) Revenue recognition

Revenue is recognised to the extent 
that it is probable that the economic 
benefits will flow to the Group 
and the revenue can be reliably 
measured. The following specific 
recognition criteria must also be met 
before revenue is recognised:

Rendering of services
Revenue from the installation 
and ongoing support of software 
applications and services is 
recognised by reference to the 
stage of completion of a contract 
or contracts in progress. Stage 
of completion is measured by 
completion of identifiable service 
segments as a percentage of the 
total services to be provided for each 
contract, which is determined by a 
quotation with the customer.

Service Revenue is recognised over 
the term of the contract. Where 
revenue is received in advance, 
revenue is recognised in the period 
during which the service is provided.

Where the contract outcome cannot 
be reliably measured, revenue is 
recognised only to the extent that 
costs have been incurred.

Licences
License revenue is recognised 
when control of the right to be 
compensated for the license can be 
reliably measured. License revenue 
is recognised when ownership of 
the goods have passed to the buyer, 
which is usually after the software 
application has been installed and is 
ready for use by the buyer.

Interest
Revenue is recognised as the 
interest accrues (using the effective 
interest method, which is the rate 
that exactly discounts estimated 
future cash receipts through 
the expected life of the financial 
instrument) to the net carrying 
amount of the financial asset.

(h) Leases

The determination of whether 
an arrangement is or contains a 
lease is based on the substance of 
the arrangement and requires an 
assessment of whether the fulfilment 
of the arrangement is dependant on 
the use of a specific asset or assets 
and the arrangement conveys a right 
to use the asset.

Group as a lessee
Leases where the lessor retains 
substantially all the risks and 
benefits of ownership of the asset 
are classified as operating leases. 

Operating lease payments are 
recognised as an expense in the 
statement of comprehensive income 
on a straight–line basis over the 
lease term.

(i)  Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents in the 
statement of financial position 
comprise cash at bank and in hand 
and short term deposits with an 
original maturity of three months or 
less that are readily convertible to 
known amounts of cash and which 
are subject to an insignificant risk of 
changes of value.

For the purposes of the Cash Flow 
Statement, cash and cash equivalents 
consist of cash and cash equivalents 
as defined above.

(j)  Trade and other receivables

Trade and intercompany receivables 
are recognised initially at fair value 
and subsequently measured at 
amortised cost less an allowance for 
any uncollectible amounts.

A provision for impairment is made 
when there is objective evidence 
that Pro Medicus will not be able to 
collect the debts. Financial difficulty 
of the debtors is considered objective 
evidence by the Group. Bad debts 
are written off when identified.

(k)  Inventories

Inventories are valued at the lower 
of cost and net realisable value. The 
cost of finished goods represents the 
purchase cost.

Net realisable value is the estimated 
selling price in the ordinary course 
of business, less estimated costs of 
completion and the estimated costs 
necessary to make the sale.

(l)  Derivative financial 

instruments and hedging

The Group has not transacted any 
derivative financial instruments 
to hedge its risk associated 
foreign currency and interest rate 
fluctuations. 

(m) Investments and other 

financial assets

Investments and financial assets in 
the scope of AASB 139 Financial 
Instruments: Recognition and 
Measurement are categorised 
as either financial assets at fair 
value through profit or loss, loans 
and receivables, held–to–maturity 
investments, or available–for–sale 
financial assets. The classification 
depends on the purpose for which 
the investments were acquired 
or originated. Designation is re–
evaluated at each reporting date, but 
there are restrictions on reclassifying 
to other categories. When financial 
assets are recognised initially, they 
are measured at fair value, plus, 
in the case of assets not at fair 
value through profit or loss, directly 
attributable transaction costs.

32     Annual Report 2013

33    

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS cont.

Recognition and 
derecognition
All regular way purchases and sales 
of financial assets are recognised 
on the trade date i.e., the date that 
the Group commits to purchase 
the asset. Regular way purchases 
or sales are purchases or sales of 
financial assets under contracts that 
require delivery of the assets within 
the period established generally 
by regulation or convention in the 
market place. Financial assets are 
derecognised when the right to 
receive cash flows from the financial 
assets has expired or when the entity 
transfers substantially all the risks 
and rewards of the financial assets. If 
the entity neither retains nor transfers 
substantially all of the risks and 
rewards, it derecognises the asset if it 
has transferred control of the assets.

Subsequent 
measurement

(i)  Financial assets at fair value  

through profit or loss
Financial assets classified as 
held for trading are included in 
the category “financial assets at 
fair value through profit or loss”. 
Financial assets are classified 
as held for trading if they are 
acquired for the purpose of 
selling in the near term with 
the intention of making a profit. 
Derivatives are also classified as 
held for trading unless they are 
designated as effective hedging 
instruments. Gains or losses on 
financial assets held for trading 
are recognised in profit or loss 
and the related assets are 
classified as current assets in the 
statement of financial position.

 (ii) Loans and receivables

Loans and receivables including 
loan notes and loans to key 
management personnel are 
non–derivative financial assets 
with fixed or determinable 
payments that are not quoted in 
an active market. Such assets 
are carried at amortised cost 
using the effective interest rate 
method. Gains and losses are 
recognised in profit or loss when 
the loans and receivables are 
derecognised or impaired. These 
are included in current assets, 
except for those with maturities 
greater than 12 months after 
reporting date, which are 
classified as non–current.

(n) Foreign currency translation

(i)  Functional and presentation    

currency
Both the functional and 
presentation currency of 
Pro Medicus Limited and its 
Australian subsidiaries are 
Australian dollars ($). The United 
States subsidiaries’ functional 
currency is United States Dollars. 
The subsidiary in Germany 
has a functional currency of 
Euro. Foreign subsidiaries 
are translated to presentation 
currency (see below for 
consolidated reporting).

(ii) Transactions and balances

Transactions in foreign currencies 
are initially recorded in the 
functional currency by applying the 
exchange rates ruling at the date 
of the transaction. Monetary assets 
and liabilities denominated in 
foreign currencies are retranslated 
at the rate of exchange ruling at the 
reporting date.

Non–monetary items that are 
measured in terms of historical 
cost in a foreign currency are 
translated using the exchange 
rate as at the date of the initial 
transaction. Non–monetary items 
measured at fair value in a foreign 
currency are translated using the 
exchange rates at the date when 
the fair value was determined.

 (iii) Translation of Group   
  Companies’ functional  

currency to presentation  
currency
The results of the United States 
and German subsidiaries are 
translated into Australian dollars 
(presentation currency) using 
an average exchange rate 
for the trading period. Assets 
and liabilities are translated at 
exchange rates prevailing at 
reporting date.

Exchange variations resulting 
from the translation are 
recognised in the foreign currency 
translation reserve in equity.

On consolidation, exchange 
differences arising from the 
translation of the net investments 
in foreign subsidiaries are taken 
to the foreign currency translation 
reserve. If a foreign subsidiary 
were sold, the proportionate 

share of exchange differences 
would be transferred out of equity 
and recognised in the statement 
of comprehensive income.

(o) Income tax

Current tax assets and liabilities 
for the current and prior periods 
are measured at the amount 
expected to be recovered from or 
paid to the taxation authorities. 
The tax rates and tax laws used 
to compute the amount are those 
that are enacted or substantively 
enacted by the reporting date.

Deferred income tax is provided 
on all temporary differences at the 
reporting date between the tax 
bases of assets and liabilities and 
their carrying amounts for financial 
reporting purposes.

Deferred income tax liabilities 
are recognised for all taxable 
temporary differences, except: 

 ▶ where the deferred income tax 
liability arises from the initial 
recognition of an asset or liability 
in a transaction that is not a 
business combination and, at the 
time of the transaction, affects 
neither the accounting profit nor 
taxable profit or loss.

 ▶ when the taxable temporary 
difference is associated with 
investments in subsidiaries, 
associates or interests in joint 
ventures, and the timing of 
the reversal of the temporary 
difference can be controlled and 
it is probable that the temporary 
difference will not reverse in the 
foreseeable future.

Deferred income tax assets are 
recognised for all deductible 
temporary differences, carry 
forward of unused tax assets 
and unused tax losses, to the 
extent that it is probable that 
taxable profit will be available 
against which the deductible 
temporary differences, and the 
carry–forward of unused tax 
assets and unused tax losses 
can be utilised, except:

 ▶ where the deferred income tax 
asset relating to the deductible 
temporary difference arises from 
the initial recognition of an asset 
or liability in a transaction that is 
not a business combination and, 
at the time of the transaction, 
affects neither the accounting 
profit nor taxable profit or loss.

 ▶ when the deductible temporary 
difference is associated with 
investments in subsidiaries, 
associates or interests in joint 
ventures, in which case a deferred 
tax asset is only recognised to 
the extent that it is probable that 
the temporary difference will 
reverse in the foreseeable future 
and taxable profit will be available 
against which the temporary 
difference can be utilised.

The carrying amount of deferred 
income tax assets is reviewed at each 
reporting date and reduced to the 
extent that it is no longer probable that 
sufficient taxable profit will be available 
to allow all or part of the deferred 
income tax asset to be utilised.

Unrecognised deferred income 
tax assets are reassessed at each 
reporting date and are recognised to 
the extent that it has become probable 
that future taxable profit will allow the 
deferred tax asset to be recovered.

Deferred income tax assets and 
liabilities are measured at the tax 
rates that are expected to apply to 
the year when the asset is realised 
or the liability is settled, based on 
the tax rates (and tax laws) that 
have been enacted or substantively 
enacted at the reporting date.

Deferred tax assets and deferred tax 
liabilities are offset only if a legally 
enforceable right exists to set off 
current tax assets against current tax 
liabilities and the deferred tax assets 
and liabilities relate to the same taxable 
entity and the same taxation authority.

Income taxes relating to items 
recognised directly in equity are 
recognised in equity and not in the 
statement of comprehensive income.

Tax consolidation 
legislation
Pro Medicus Limited and its wholly–
owned Australian controlled entities 
implemented the tax consolidation 
legislation as of 1 July 2009.

The head entity, Pro Medicus Limited 
and the controlled entities in the 
tax consolidated group continue to 
account for their own current and 
deferred tax amounts. The Group has 
applied the Group allocation approach 
to determining the appropriate 
amount of current taxes and deferred 
taxes to allocate to members of the 
tax consolidated group.

In addition to its own current and deferred tax amounts, Pro Medicus also 
recognises the current tax liabilities (or assets) and the deferred tax assets 
arising from unused tax losses and unused tax credits assumed from 
controlled entities in the tax consolidated group.

Pro Medicus Limited and its 100% owned Australian resident subsidiaries 
formed a tax consolidated group with effect from 1 January 2009. Pro 
Medicus Limited is the head entity of the tax consolidated group. An allocation 
of income tax liabilities between the entities of the tax consolidated group will 
be made should the head entity default on its tax payment obligations. No 
such amounts have been recognised in the financial statements on the basis 
that the possibility of default is remote.

(p) Other taxes

Revenues, expenses and assets are recognised net of the amount of 
GST except:

 ▶ when the GST incurred on a purchase of goods and services is not 

recoverable from the taxation authority, in which case the GST is recognised 
as part of the cost of acquisition of the asset or of the expense item as 
applicable; and

 ▶ receivables and payables are stated with the amount of GST included.

The net amount of GST recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation 
authority is included as part of receivables or payables in the statement of 
financial position.

Cash flows are included in the Cash Flow Statement on a gross basis and 
the GST component of cash flows arising from investing and financing 
activities, which is recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation authority are 
classified as operating cash flows.

Commitments and contingencies are disclosed net of the amount of GST 
recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation authority.

(q) Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations

The Group classifies non-current assets and disposal groups as held for 
sale if their carrying amounts will be recovered principally through a sale 
transaction rather than through continuing use. Non-current assets and 
disposal groups classified as held for sale are measured at the lower 
of their carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell. The criteria for 
held for sale classification is regarded as met only when the sale is highly 
probable and the asset or disposal group is available for immediate sale in 
its present condition. Management must be committed to the sale, which 
should be expected to qualify for recognition as a completed sale within 
one year from the date of classification.

Discontinued operations are excluded from the results of continuing 
operations and are presented as a single amount as profit or loss after tax 
from discontinued operations in the income statement.

Property, plant and equipment and intangible assets are not depreciated 
or amortised once classified as held for sale.

(r)  Plant and equipment

Plant and equipment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and 
any impairment in value.

Depreciation is calculated on a straight–line basis over the estimated 
useful life of the asset as follows: 

2013

2012

Property Improvements

2 to 7 years

2 to 7 years

Motor Vehicles

Office Equipment

4 to 5 years

4 to 5 years

2 to 7 years

2 to 7 years

Furniture and Fittings

5 years

5 years

Research and Development Equipment

3 to 4 years

3 to 4 years

34     Annual Report 2013

35    

 
 
 
 
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS cont.

An item of plant and equipment is 
derecognised upon disposal or when 
no future economic benefits are 
expected to arise from the continued 
use of the asset.

Any gain or loss arising on de–
recognition of the asset (calculated 
as the difference between the net 
disposal proceeds and the carrying 
amount of the item) is included in 
the statement of comprehensive 
income in the period the item is 
derecognised.

Impairment
The carrying values of plant 
and equipment are reviewed for 
impairment at each reporting date, 
with recoverable amount being 
estimated when events or changes 
in circumstances indicate that the 
carrying value may be impaired.

For an asset that does not generate 
largely independent cash inflows, the 
recoverable amount is determined for 
the cash generating unit to which the 
asset belongs.

If any such indication exists and 
where the carrying values exceed 
the estimated recoverable amount, 
the assets or cash–generating  
units are written down to their 
recoverable amount.

The recoverable amount of plant 
and equipment is the greater of fair 
value less costs to sell and value 
in use. In assessing value in use, 
the estimated future cash flows are 
discounted to their present value 
using a pre–tax discount rate that 
reflects current market assessments 
of the time value of money and the 
risks specific to the asset.

(s) Intangible assets 

Intangible assets acquired 
separately or in a business 
combination are initially 
measured at cost. The cost of  
an intangible asset acquired in  
a business combination is its fair 
value as at date of acquisition. 
Following initial recognition, 
intangible assets with a finite 
life are carried at cost less any 
accumulated amortisation  
and any accumulated 
impairment losses.

Amortisation is calculated on 
a straight–line basis over the 
estimated useful life of the asset. 

Intangible assets, excluding 
development costs, created 

within the business are not 
capitalised and expenditure is 
charged against profits in the 
period in which the expenditure 
is incurred.

Intangible assets are tested 
for impairment where an 
indicator of impairment exists, 
either individually or at the 
cash generating unit level. The 
recoverable amount is estimated 
and an impairment loss is 
recognised to the extent that the 
recoverable amount is lower than 
the carrying value.

The amortisation period 
and method is renewed at 
each financial year end and 
adjustments, where applicable, 
are made on a prospective basis. 

Research and  
development costs
Research costs are expensed 
as incurred.
An intangible asset arising from 
development expenditure on an 
internal project is recognised only 
when the group can demonstrate the 
technical feasibility of completing 
the intangible asset so that it will 
be available for sale or use, its 
intention to complete and its ability 
to use or sell the asset, how the 
asset will generate future economic 
benefits, the availability of resources 
to complete the development 
and the ability to measure reliably 
the expenditure attributable to 
the intangible asset during its 
development. Following initial 
recognition of the development 
expenditure, the cost model is 
applied requiring the asset be 
carried at cost less any accumulated 
amortisation and accumulated 
impairment losses. Any expenditure 
so capitalised is amortised on a 
straight line basis over the period of 
expected benefit from the related 
project (5 years). 

Development expenditure includes 
costs of materials and services 
and salaries and wages and other 
employee related costs arising from 
the generation of the intangible asset.

The carrying value of an intangible 
asset arising from development 
expenditure is tested for impairment 
annually when the asset is not yet 
available for use or more frequently 
when an indication of impairment 
arises during the reporting period.

Intellectual Property – 
Software
Three separately identifiable 
intangible assets, in the form of 
software intellectual property, have 
previously been identified in the 
business acquisition of Visage 
Imaging;

 ▶ Visage CS

 ▶ Visage PACS and 

 ▶ Amira

Following initial recognition, 
Intellectual property is measured 
at cost less any accumulated 
amortisation. A useful life of 5 years 
has been determined.

Software Licenses
The Group identified a separate 
intangible asset in the form of 
software licenses, in the business 
acquisition of Visage Imaging.

Following initial recognition, 
software licenses are measured 
at cost less any accumulated 
amortisation. A useful life of  
4 years has been determined.

Customer List
The Group identified a separate 
intangible asset in the form of 
a customer list, in the business 
acquisition of Visage Imaging.

Following initial recognition,  
the customer list is measured  
at cost less any accumulated 
amortisation. A useful life of 4 years 
has been determined.

(t)  Trade and other payables
Trade payables and other 
payables are carried at 
amortised cost and represent 
liabilities for goods and services 
provided to the Group prior to 
the end of the financial year that 
are unpaid and arise when the 
Group becomes obliged to make 
future payments in respect of  
the purchase of these goods  
and services.

(u)  Provisions

Provisions are recognised 
when the Group has a present 
obligation (legal or constructive) 
as a result of a past event, it 
is probable that an outflow of 
resources embodying economic 
benefits will be required to settle 
the obligation and a reliable 
estimate can be made of the 
amount of the obligation.

When the Group expects 
some or all of a provision to be 
reimbursed, for example under 
an insurance contract, the 
reimbursement is recognised 
as a separate asset but only 
when the reimbursement is 
virtually certain. The expense 
relating to any provision is 
presented in the statement of 
comprehensive income net of 
any reimbursement.

Provisions are measured at the 
present value of management’s 
best estimate of the expenditure 
required to settle the present 
obligation at the reporting date.

Dividends payable are recognised 
when a legal or constructive 
obligation to pay the dividend 
arises, typically following 
approval of the dividend at a 
meeting of directors.

(v) Employee leave benefits

Provision is made for employee 
entitlement benefits accumulated 
as a result of employees 
rendering services up to the 
reporting date.

(i)  Wages salaries, annual leave   

and sick leave
Liabilities for wages and salaries 
and annual leave, expected to be 
settled within twelve months of 
the reporting date are recognised 
in respect of employees’ services 
up to the reporting date. They 
are measured at the amounts 
expected to be paid when the 
liabilities are settled. Expenses 
for non–accumulating sick leave 
are recognised when the leave is 
taken and are measured at the 
rates paid.

(ii)  Long Service Leave

The liability for long service leave 
is recognised and measured as 
the present value of expected 
future payments to be made in 
respect of services provided by 
employees up to the reporting 
date, using the projected unit 
credit method. Consideration is 
given to expected future wage 
and salary levels, experience 
of employee departures, and 
periods of service. Expected 
future payments are discounted 
using market yields at the 
reporting date on national 
government bonds with terms 
to maturity and currencies that 
match, as closely as possible the 
estimated future cash outflows.

(w) Share based payment  

transactions

(i) Equity settled transactions:
The Group provides benefits to its 
employees (including KMP) in the 
form of share-based payments, 
whereby employees render services 
in exchange for shares or rights over 
shares (equity-settled transactions).

There are currently two plans in place 
to provide these benefits:

 ▶ The Employee Share Option Plan 

(ESOP), which provides benefits to 
directors and senior executives.

 ▶ The Long Term Incentive Plan 

(LTIP), which provides benefits to 
directors and senior executives.

The cost of these equity-settled 
transactions with employees (for 
awards granted after 7 November 
2002 that were unvested at 1 
January 2005) is measured by 
reference to the fair value of the 
equity instruments at the date at 
which they are granted. The fair value 
is determined using a Black Scholes 
model, further details of which are 
given in note 19.

In valuing equity-settled transactions, 
no account is taken of any vesting 
conditions, other than conditions 
linked to the price of the shares 
of Pro Medicus Limited (market 
conditions) if applicable.

The cost of equity-settled transactions 
is recognised, together with a 
corresponding increase in equity, over 
the period in which the performance 
and/or service conditions are fulfilled 
(the vesting period), ending on the 
date on which the relevant employees 
become fully entitled to the award (the 
vesting date).

At each subsequent reporting date 
until vesting, the cumulative charge 
to the statement of comprehensive 
income is the product of:

(i) The grant date fair value of the award;

(ii) For options with non–market  
vesting conditions, the current  
best estimate of the number of 
awards that will vest, taking  
into account such factors as the 
likelihood of employee turnover 
during the vesting period and 
the likelihood of non–market 
performance conditions being  
met; and

(iii) The expired portion of the  

vesting period.

The charge to the statement of 
comprehensive income for the period 
is the cumulative amount as calculated 
above less the amounts already 
charged in previous periods. There is a 
corresponding entry to equity.

Until an award has vested, any 
amounts recorded are contingent 
and will be adjusted if more or fewer 
awards vest than were originally 
anticipated to do so. Any award 
subject to a market condition is 
considered to vest irrespective of 
whether or not that market condition 
is fulfilled, provided that all other 
conditions are satisfied.

If the terms of an equity–settled 
award are modified, as a minimum 
an expense is recognised as if the 
terms had not been modified. An 
additional expense is recognised 
for any modification that increases 
the total fair value of the share–
based payment arrangement, 
or is otherwise beneficial to the 
employee, as measured at the date 
of modification.

If an equity–settled award is 
cancelled, it is treated as if it had 
vested on the date of cancellation, 
and any expense not yet recognised 
for the award is recognised 
immediately. However, if a new award 
is substituted for the cancelled award 
and designated as a replacement 
award on the date that it is granted, 
the cancelled and new award are 
treated as if they were a modification 
of the original award, as described in 
the previous paragraph.

The dilutive effect, if any, of 
outstanding options is reflected 
as additional share dilution in the 
computation of diluted earnings per 
share (see note 9).

(x) Contributed equity

Ordinary shares are classified as 
equity. Incremental costs directly 
attributable to the issue of new 
shares or options are shown in 
equity as a deduction, net of tax, 
from the proceeds.

(y) Earnings per share

Basic earnings per share 
is calculated as net profit 
attributable to members of the 
Group, adjusted to exclude any 
costs of servicing equity (other 
than dividends) divided by the 
weighted average number of 
ordinary shares, adjusted for any 
bonus element.

36     Annual Report 2013

37    

 
 
 
 
 
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS cont.

Diluted earnings per share 
is calculated as net profit 
attributable to members of  
the Group adjusted for 

 – Costs of servicing equity  
(other than dividends)

 – The after tax effect of 
dividends and interest 
associated with dilutive 
potential ordinary shares that 
have been recognised as 
expenses; and

 – Other non–discretionary 
changes in revenue or 
expenses during the period 
that would result from the 
dilution of potential ordinary 
shares and 

 – Dilutive potential ordinary 
shares adjusted for any  
bonus element.

3. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING JUDGEMENTS,  
    ESTIMATES AND ASSUMPTIONS
The preparation of the financial statements requires management to 
make judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the reported 
amounts in the financial statements. Management continually evaluates 
its judgements and estimates in relation to assets, liabilities, contingent 
liabilities, revenue and expenses. Management bases its judgements and 
estimates on historical experience and on other various factors it believes to 
be reasonable under the circumstances, the result of which form the basis of 
the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from 
other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different 
assumptions and conditions.

Management has identified the following critical accounting policies for which 
significant judgements, estimates and assumptions are made. Actual results 
may differ from these estimates under different assumptions and conditions 
and may materially affect financial results or the financial position reported in 
future periods.

Further details of the nature of these assumptions and conditions may be 
found in the relevant notes to the financial statements.

(i) Significant accounting judgements

and then divided by the weighted 
average number of ordinary shares.

(z)  Comparatives

Where necessary, comparatives 
have been reclassified and 
repositioned for consistency  
with current year disclosures. 

(aa) Government Grants

Recovery of deferred tax assets:
Deferred tax assets are recognised for deductible temporary differences as 
management considers that it is probable that future taxable profits will be 
available to utilise those temporary differences.

Capitalisation of Development costs:
Development costs are only capitalised by the Group when it can be 
demonstrated that the technical feasibility of completing the intangible asset 
is valid so that the asset will be available for use or sale.

Research and Development 
tax credits are recognized in 
accordance with AASB 120: 
Accounting for Government 
Grants and Government 
Assistance. The Research 
and development tax credit 
is recognised when there is 
reasonable assurance that the 
grant will be received and all 
conditions have been complied 
with. The Grant is recognised as a 
reduction to the cost base of the 
intangible and released to income 
as a reduction in amortization 
expense over the expected useful 
life of the related asset. The 
amount recognised for the period 
to 30 June 2013 is $654,439.
(2012:$463,242).

Impairment of non–financial assets 
The Group assesses impairment of all assets at each reporting date by 
evaluating conditions specific to the Group and to the particular asset that 
may lead to impairment. If an impairment trigger exists the recoverable 
amount of the asset is determined. Given the current uncertain economic 
environment management considered that the indicators of impairment were 
significant enough and as such these assets have been tested for impairment 
in this financial period.

Taxation
The Group’s accounting policy for taxation requires management’s judgement 
as to the types of arrangements considered to be a tax on income in contrast 
to an operating cost. Judgement is also required in assessing whether 
deferred tax assets and certain deferred tax liabilities are recognised on the 
statement of financial position. Deferred tax assets, including those arising 
from un-recouped tax losses, capital losses and temporary differences, 
are recognised only where it is considered more likely than not that they 
will be recovered, which is dependent on the generation of sufficient future 
taxable profits. Deferred tax liabilities arising from temporary differences 
in investments, caused principally by retained earnings held in foreign tax 
jurisdictions, are recognised unless repatriation of retained earnings can 
be controlled and are not expected to occur in the foreseeable future. 

38     Annual Report 2013

Assumptions about the generation 
of future taxable profits and 
repatriation of retained earnings 
depend on management’s estimates 
of future cash flows. These depend 
on estimates of future sales 
volumes, operating costs, capital 
expenditure, dividends and other 
capital management transactions. 
Judgements are also required 
about the application of income 
tax legislation. These judgements 
and assumptions are subject to 
risk and uncertainty, hence there 
is a possibility that changes in 
circumstances will alter expectations, 
which may impact the amount of 
deferred tax assets and deferred tax 
liabilities recognised on the statement 
of financial position and the amount 
of other tax losses and temporary 
differences not yet recognised. In 
such circumstances, some or all of 
the carrying amounts of recognised 
deferred tax assets and liabilities 
may require adjustment, resulting in a 
corresponding credit or charge to the 
statement of comprehensive income.

Net investment in Foreign 
Operations
The Group maintains inter-company 
loans it assesses to represent a part 
of its net investment in its foreign 
operations. The judgements made in 
assessing these loans to represent 
net investments are on the basis the 
loans are neither planned nor likely 
to be settled within the foreseeable 
future, the loans do not include 
trade receivables or trade payable 
and the loans represent a return of 
funds from their investment in the 
respective subsidiaries.

(ii) Significant accounting 
estimates and assumptions

Capitalisation of 
development costs
The capitalisation of development 
costs includes an overhead rate 
which has been estimated from total 
costs. The estimated development 
overheads rate has been calculated 
by dividing the development labour 
costs over total labour costs to give 
a percentage of development labour 
rate. The development labour rate 
is then applied against the total 
overheads of the company, to give an 
estimate of the amount of overheads 
that relates to development.

4. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES       
    AND POLICIES
The group’s principal financial instruments are cash and short–term deposits. 

The main purpose of these financial instruments is to provide finance for the 
Group’s operations. The Group has various other financial assets and liabilities 
such as trade receivables and trade payables, which arise directly from its 
operations. The main risks arising from the Group’s financial instruments are 
foreign currency risk, interest risk and credit risk. The Board manages each 
of these risks as detailed below.

Foreign currency risk
The Group has transactional currency exposure, which arise from sales made 
in currencies other than the Group’s functional currency.

Approximately 51% (2012: 62%) of the Group’s sales are denominated in 
currencies other than the functional currency, and these sales would be 
predominately offset by currency exposure on costs. Foreign bank accounts 
have also been established, to create a natural hedge and reduce the need for 
regular transfers from the functional currency (AUD) cash holdings.

At 30 June the Group had the following exposure to US$ foreign currency that 
is not designated in cash flow hedges

CONSOLIDATED

Financial assets

Cash and cash equivalents

Financial liabilities

Trade and other payables

Net exposure

2013

$000

25

25

–

25

2012

$000

56

56

–

56

At 30 June the Group had the following exposure to CAD$ foreign currency 
that is not designated in cash flow hedges

CONSOLIDATED

Financial assets

Cash and cash equivalents

Financial liabilities

Trade and other payables

Net exposure

2013

$000

1,145 

1,145 

–

1,145 

2012

$000

1,185

1,185

–

1,185

At 30 June the Group had the following exposure to GBP₤ foreign currency 
that is not designated in cash flow hedges

CONSOLIDATED

Financial assets

Cash and cash equivalents

Financial liabilities

Trade and other payables

Net exposure

2013

$000

566 

566

–

566 

2012

$000

420

420

–

420

39    

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS cont.

At 30 June the Group had the following exposure to EUR€ foreign currency that is not designated in cash flow hedges

At 30 June 2013, if interest rates had moved, as illustrated in the table below, with all other variables held constant, 
post tax profit and equity (excluding retained profits) would have been affected as follows:

Financial assets

Cash and cash equivalents

Financial liabilities

Trade and other payables

Net exposure

CONSOLIDATED

2013

$000

9,295 

9,295 

–

9,295 

2012

$000

57

57

–

57

At 30 June, had the Australian Dollar moved, as illustrated in the table below, with all other variables held constant, 
post tax profit and equity (excluding retained profits) would have been affected as follows:

JUDGEMENTS OF REASONABLY POSSIBLE 
MOVEMENTS:

AUD/USD +10%

AUD/USD – 5%

AUD/CAD +10%

AUD/CAD – 5%

AUD/GBP +10%

AUD/GBP – 5%

AUD/EUR +10%

AUD/EUR – 5%

POST TAX PROFIT 
HIGHER/(LOWER)

OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME HIGHER/
(LOWER)

2013

$’000

(2)

1

(114)

57

(57)

28

(930)

465

2012

$’000

(6)

3

(118)

59

(42)

21

(6)

3

2013

$’000

(24)

12

–

–

–

–

(107)

54

2012

$’000

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

Management believe the reporting date risk exposures are representative of the risk exposure inherent in the financial 
instruments. 

Credit risk
Credit risk arises from the financial instruments of the Group, which comprise 
cash and cash equivalents and trade and other receivables. The Group’s 
exposure to credit risk arises from potential defaults of the counter–party, with 
a maximum exposure equal to the carrying amount of the financial assets.

Interest risk
The Group exposure to market 
interest rates relates primarily to 
the company’s cash and cash 
equivalents.

The Group trades only with recognised, credit worthy third parties.

It is the Group’s policy that all customers who wish to trade on credit terms are 
subject to credit assessment.

In addition, receivable balances are monitored on an ongoing basis with the 
result that the Group’s exposure to bad debts is not significant.

As the Group trades predominantly within the Diagnostic Imaging market there is 
a concentration of credit risk. Given the underlying Government funding support 
for Radiology in Hospital settings and the Imaging Centre and Diagnostic Imaging 
market, and the commercial successes achieved by the Group to date, credit risk 
is considered to be minimal. 

Cash and cash equivalents are held with several financial institutions, with the 
majority held with the Westpac Banking Corporation, a AA rated bank.

At reporting date, the Group had the 
following financial assets exposed to 
Australian Variable interest rate risk 
that are not designated in cash flow 
hedges:

Cash and Cash equivalents in the 
Group ($’000’s) $18,023 (2012: 
$5,193).

The Group’s policy is to place cash 
balances in either 30 day term 
deposits or commercial bills that 
earn higher interest rates.

CONSOLIDATED

JUDGEMENTS OF REASONABLY POSSIBLE MOVEMENTS:

+1% (100 basis points)

– 1% (100 basis points)

POST TAX PROFIT  
HIGHER/(LOWER) 

OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME 
HIGHER/(LOWER)

2013

$’000

180

(180)

2012

$’000

–

–

2013

$’000

52

(52)

2012

$’000

–

–

Liquidity risk
The Group has minimal liquidity risk as it has cash reserves of $18.0m, with no borrowings.

These cash reserves are deemed to be adequate and the Board believes they will underpin the ongoing growth of  
the business.

The table below reflects all contractually fixed pay-offs for settlement and repayments resulting from recognised financial 
liabilities. Cash flows for financial liabilities without fixed amount of timing are based on the conditions existing at 30 
June 2013.

The remaining contractual maturities of the Group’s financial liabilities are:

CONSOLIDATED

2013

$000

407

18

33

588 

1,046 

2012

$000

889

–

–

819

1,708

<30 days

31–60 days

61–90 days

Over 90 days

TOTAL

5. OPERATING SEGMENTS
The Group has identified its operating segments based on the internal reports 
that are reviewed and used by the executive management team (the chief 
operating decision makers) in assessing performance and in determining the 
allocation of resources.

The operating segments are identified by management based on country of 
origin. Discrete financial information is reported to the executive management 
team on at least a monthly basis.

Types of products and services 
The Group produces integrated software applications for the health care 
industry. In addition, the Group provides services in the form of installation 
and support. 

Accounting policies and inter–segment transactions
The accounting policies used by the Group in reporting segments internally is 
the same as those contained in note 2 to the financial statements and in the 
prior periods except as detailed below:

Inter–entity sales
Inter–entity sales are recognised based on an internally set transfer price. The 
price aims to reflect what the business operation could achieve if they sold 
their output and services to external parties at arm’s length.

40     Annual Report 2013

41    

 
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS cont.

AUSTRALIA

EUROPE

NORTH AMERICA

TOTAL OPERATIONS

2013

$’000

2012

$’000

2013

$’000

2012

$’000

2013

$’000

2012

$’000

2013

$’000

2012

$’000

5,479

1,750

7,229

5,428

1,755

7,183

2,807

3,519

6,326

3,625

3,263

6,888

2,868

2,260

11,154

11,313

–

–

5,269

5,018

2,868

2,260

16,423

16,331

(5,269)

(5,018)

11,154

11,313

(744) 

509

342 

624

(120) 

(180)

(522) 

220

(4,600)

1,425

(3,477)

953

66

–

(263)

756

OPERATING SEGMENTS

Revenue

Sales to external customers 

Inter–segment Sales

Total segment revenue

Inter–segment elimination

Total consolidation revenue

Results

Segment Result

Interest Revenue

Non segment expense 
Impairment Expense

Income Tax Expense

Net Profit

Assets

Non–Current Assets 

11,052

11,344

185

225

822

663

–

26,386

17,084

22,688

38,260

29,091

22,873

–

6,619

6,844

42

267

2,503

2,812

55

11,279

11,624

933

1,089

1,596

1,959

51,577

25,662

2,947

63,945

38,882

(34,527)

(18,385)

29,418

20,497

Deferred Tax Asset

Current Assets

Segment Assets

Inter-segment elimination

Total Assets

Liabilities

Segment Liabilities

Inter-segment elimination

Total Liabilities

Other segment information

Capital expenditure

Depreciation and amortisation

Cash flow information

Net cash flow from  
operating activities

Net cash flow from  
investing activities

Net cash flow from  
financing activities

31,545

17,250

5,045

1,171

2,379

4,044

38,969

22,465

(30,510)

(16,268)

8,459

6,197

2,999

2,498

2,445

2,521

346

413

988

952

23

37

39

28

3,368

2,948

3,472

3,501

3,458

5,759

(1,567)

(1,267)

1,922

1,384

3,813

5,876

(2,885)

(2,398)

11,713

(969)

1,906

(39)

10,734

(3,406)

(2,005)

(501)

–

–

–

–

(2,005)

(501)

Product information
Revenue from external customers

Radiology Information Systems (RIS)

Picture Archiving Communications Systems (PACS)

Other income

NOTES

CONSOLIDATED

2013

$’000

5,817 

5,272 

65 

2012

$’000

5,778

5,471

64

Total revenue per statement of comprehensive income

11,154 

11,313

6. INCOME AND EXPENSES
(a) Other Income

Net Currency Gains

Net Currency (Loss)

Other Income

(b) Expenses

Depreciation and Amortisation

Motor Vehicles

Office Equipment

Furniture and Fittings and Property Improvements

Research & Development Equipment

Amortisation on capitalised development costs

Intangible assets

Total Depreciation and Amortisation Expense

Salaries and Employee Benefits Expense

Wages & Salaries

Long service leave provision

Share–based payment

Defined contribution plan expense

Total Salaries and Employee Benefits Expense

14

14

14

14

14

14

1,590

(1,034)

130 

686

2,356

(1,544)

–

812

3

135

13

1

2,419

377 

2,948

4

133

6

7

2,354

432

2,936

5,054

4,526

27

54

780

5,915

18

50

785

5,379

42     Annual Report 2013

43    

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS cont.

NOTES

CONSOLIDATED

2013

$’000

2012

$’000

7. INCOME TAX
The major components of income tax expense are:

Statement of Comprehensive Income

Current income tax

Current income tax charge/(benefit)

Prior year adjustment

Deferred income tax

Relating to origination and reversal of temporary differences

Income tax expense/(benefit) reported in the statement of 
comprehensive income

A reconciliation between tax expense and the product of accounting 
profit before income tax multiplied by the Group’s applicable income 
tax rate is as follows:

Accounting profit before tax 

At the applicable statutory income tax rate in each country 

Prior year adjustment

Discontinued operations

Expenditure not allowable for income tax purposes

Other 

Income tax expense/(benefit) reported in the statement of 
comprehensive income

(324)

(276)

(825)

(1,425)

7,547

2,365

(276)

(3,841)

139

188

(1,425)

68

–

195

263

2,591

875

–

(537)

81

(156)

263

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT 
OF FINANCIAL POSITION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT 
OF COMPREHENSIVE 
INCOME

Deferred income tax 

Deferred income tax at 30 June relates to the following:

Deferred tax liabilities

Foreign Currency Exchange Gain

Intellectual Property expenses

Capitalised development expenses

Liabilities directly associated with the assets classified as held 
for sale

Other

2013

$’000

561

(318)

1,657

–

2

2012

$’000

435

(115)

3,593

(681)

2013

$’000

126

(203)

(1,936)

681

2

–

Deferred income tax liabilities

1,902

3,234

(1,332)

Deferred tax assets

Employee Entitlements

Tax Losses in Subsidiaries

Audit Fee Accrual

Other 

Deferred income tax assets

283

786

16

4

300

1,274

18

4

17

488

2

–

1,089

1,596

507

2012

$’000

233

(201)

28

–

–

60

(4)

138

5

(4)

135

Tax Consolidation
Pro Medicus Limited and its 100% owned Australian resident subsidiaries formed a tax consolidated group with effect 
from 1 January 2009. Pro Medicus Limited is the head entity of the tax consolidated group.

8. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS 
On 2 July 2012, the Group publicly announced the decision of its Board of Directors to sell its life sciences division of 
Visage Imaging, Amira. The business division of Amira is considered non-core to the operations of the Group and an 
offer to purchase the business was made from a French IT company, Visualization Sciences Group (VSG). The disposal 
of Amira was completed on 31 July 2012 for $14,144,000 in cash resulting in a pre-tax gain of $12,216,800.

The results of Amira for the period are presented below:

Revenue

Cost of Goods Sold

Gross Profit

Operating Expenses

Profit/(loss) before tax from a discontinued operation

Income tax expense

Profit/(loss) for the year from a discontinued operation

Gain on disposal of the discontinued operations

Attributable tax expense

Profit/(loss) after tax on disposal of the discontinued operation

NOTES

CONSOLIDATED

2013

$’000

327

(4)

323

(91)

232

(71)

161 

12,217

(3,770)

8,447

2012

$’000

3,013

(252)

2,761

(1,189)

1,572

(537)

1,035

–

–

–

Total profit after tax for the period from a discontinued operation

8,608

1,035

Cash inflow on sale:

Consideration received

Net cash disposed of with the discontinued operations 

Net cash inflow

The net cash flows incurred by Amira are as follows:

Operating

Investing

Financing

Net cash (outflow)/inflow

Earning per share

Basic from discontinued operations

Diluted from discontinued operations

14,144

(261)

13,883

276

–

–

276

1,069

(651)

–

418

CENTS

CENTS

8.6

8.6

1.1 

1.1

As Amira was sold prior to 30 June 2013,  the net assets of $1,927,000 which were  classified as held for sale  are  no 
longer  included  in the Consolidated statement of financial position.

Unrecognised temporary differences
At 30 June 2013, there are no temporary differences associated with the Group’s investments in subsidiaries being 
recognised as the parent is able to control the timing of the reversal of any temporary differences and it is not probable 
any temporary difference will reverse in the foreseeable future.

44     Annual Report 2013

45    

 
 
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS cont.

9. EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following reflects the income and share data used in the basic and diluted earnings per share 
computations:

Net Profit attributable to ordinary equity holders of the parent from 
continuing operations

Profit/(loss) attributable to ordinary equity holders of the parent 
from discontinuing operations

NOTES

CONSOLIDATED

2013

$’000

2012

$’000

(3,477,399) 

756,035

8,608,352

1,034,523

11. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Cash at bank and in hand

Short-term deposits

NOTES

CONSOLIDATED

2013

$’000

16,002

2,021

18,023

2012

$’000

5,140

53

5,193

Cash at bank earns interest at floating rates based on daily bank deposit rates.

Net Profit attributable to ordinary equity holders

5,130,953

1,790,558

Short term deposits are made for varying periods of between 20 days and 35 days, depending on the immediate 
cash requirements of the Group, and earn interest at the respective short-term deposit rates.

Weighted average number of ordinary shares for basic earnings per share

100,263,406

100,263,406

NUMBER

NUMBER

The fair value of cash and cash equivalents is their carrying value.

Reconciliation of net profit after tax to net cash flows from operations

Effect of dilution:

Share options

–

Weighted average number of ordinary shares adjusted for the effect of dilution

100,263,406

There have been no other transactions involving ordinary shares or potential ordinary shares 
between the reporting date and the date of completion of these financial statements

–

100,280,000

10. DIVIDENDS PAID AND PROPOSED
Declared and paid during the year:

Dividends on ordinary shares

Final franked dividend for 2012: 1.0 cent (2011: nil)

Interim franked dividend for 2013: 1.0 cent (2012: 0.5 cents)

Proposed for approval by directors (not recognised as a liability as at 30 June):

Dividends on ordinary shares:

Final franked dividend for 2013: 1.0 cents (2012: 1.0 cents)

Total dividends proposed

Franking credit balance

1,003

1,002

2,005

1,002

1,002

–

501

501

1,002

1,002

 – franking account balance as at the end of the financial year at 

1,641

2,638

30% (2012: 30%)

 – franking credits that will arise from the payment of income tax 

payable as at the end of the financial year

 – franking debits that will arise from the payment of dividends as 

at the end of the financial year

 – franking credits that the entity may be prevented from 

distributing in the subsequent financial year

The amount of franking credits available for future reporting periods:

– impact on the franking account of dividends proposed or declared   
   before the financial report was authorised for issue but not recognised  
   as a distribution to equity holders during the period

The tax rate at which paid dividends have been franked is 30% (2012: 30%). 

Dividends proposed will be fully franked. 

–

–

–

–

–

–

1,641

2,638

(430)

(430)

1,211

1,779

Net profit 

Adjustments for:

Depreciation of Property Plant and Equipment

Amortisation of Intangible Assets

Interest Received classified in Investing Activities

Foreign currency (gain)/loss

Share buy back

Share option expense

Net inflow from sale of Amira, net of cash disposed

Impairment expense

Write back of discontinued intangible asset 

Changes in assets and liabilities

(Increase)/decrease in trade and other receivables

(Increase)/decrease in inventory

(Increase)/decrease in deferred tax asset

(Increase)/decrease in prepayments

(Decrease)/increase in deferred income

(Decrease)/increase in trade and other payables

(Decrease)/increase in tax provision

(Decrease)/increase in deferred income tax liability

(Decrease)/increase in employee entitlements

Net cash flow from operations

5,131

1,791

152

2,796

(220)

(566)

–

54

(13,883)

4,600

2,269

1,479

(13)

507

56

(570)

(357)

4,312

(2,013)

79

3,813

150

3,351

(66)

(812)

(4)

50

–

_

_

2,089

52

135

42

118

169

(1,219)

60

(30)

5,876

46     Annual Report 2013

47    

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS cont.

NOTES

12. TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES (CURRENT)
Trade receivables

Provision for impairment

Research & development tax receivable

Asset held for sale

Other receivables

Fair value approximates carrying value due to the short term nature of receivables.

a) Allowance for impairment loss

Movements in the provision for impairment loss were as follows:

At 1 July

Charge to/(write back of) provision for the year

Foreign exchange translation

At 30 June

2013

$’000

1,830

(65)

1,765

654

–

229

2,648

86

(29)

8

65

2012

$’000

1,538

(86)

1,452

463

(378)

155

1,692

118

(22)

(10)

86

At June 30, the ageing analysis of trade receivables is as follows:

TOTAL

0-30 DAYS

31-60 DAYS

61-90 DAYS

+91 DAYS

+91 DAYS

2013 Consolidated

2012 Consolidated

1,830

1,538

* Past due not impaired (‘PDNI’)

** Considered Impaired (‘CI’)

811

1,054

PDNI*

158

277

PDNI*

194

63

PDNI*

667

58***

CI*

65

86

*** Payment terms nil (2012: $17,377) on these debtors have been renegotiated. The company has been in direct 
contact with these debtors and is satisfied that payment will be received in full.

13. INVENTORIES (CURRENT)
Finished goods (at net realisable value)

NOTES

CONSOLIDATED

2013

$’000

113

2012

$’000

101

Inventory write downs  recognised as an expense total nil (2012: $46,095)

CONSOLIDATED

14. PLANT & 

EQUIPMENT

CONSOLIDATED

PROPERTY 
IMPROVEMENTS

MOTOR 
VEHICLES

OFFICE 
EQUIPMENT

FURNITURE 
& FITTINGS

RESEARCH & 
DEVELOPMENT 
EQUIPMENT

$’000

$’000

$’000

$’000

$’000

22

9

–

2

(4)

29

326

(297)

29

16

8

–

–

(2)

22

14

–

–

–

(3)

11

560

(549)

11

19

–

–

(1)

(4)

14

274

85

(3)

38

(135)

259

1,739

(1,480)

259

293

140

(11)

(15)

(133)

274

TOTAL

$’000

356

99

(7)

38

1

–

–

–

(1)

(152)

–

334

45

5

(4)

(2)

(9)

35

342

(307)

209

3,176

(209)

(2,842)

35

52

–

–

(3)

(4)

45

–

8

–

–

–

334

388

148

(11)

(19)

(7)

1

(150)

356

Year ended 30 June 2013

At 1 July 2012 net of 
accumulated depreciation

Additions

Disposals

Exchange differences

Depreciation charge for the 
year

At 30 June 2013 net of 
accumulated depreciation

At 30 June 2013

Cost 

Accumulated depreciation and 
impairment

Net carrying amount

Year ended 30 June 2012

At 1 July 2011 net of 
accumulated depreciation

Additions

Disposals

Exchange differences

Depreciation charge for the year

At 30 June 2012 net of 
accumulated depreciation

At 30 June 2012

Cost 

Accumulated depreciation and 
impairment

309

(287)

550

(536)

1,489

(1,215)

325

(280)

209

2,882

(208)

(2,526)

Net carrying amount

22

14

274

45

1

356

48     Annual Report 2013

49    

 
 
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS cont.

15. INTANGIBLE ASSETS

CONSOLIDATED

Year ended 30 June 2013

At 1 July 2012 net of accumulated 
amortisation and impairment

Additions - internal development

Disposals

Exchange differences

Impairment

Amortisation charge for the year

At 30 June 2013 net of accumulated 
amortisation and impairment

At 30 June 2013

Cost

Accumulated amortisation and impairment

Net carrying amount

Year ended 30 June 2012

At 1 July 2011 net of accumulated 
amortisation and impairment

Additions - internal development

Additions

Disposals

Asset held for sale

Exchange differences

Amortisation charge for the year from  
a discontinued operation

Amortisation charge for the year

At 30 June 2011 net of accumulated 
amortisation and impairment

At 30 June 2012

Cost

Asset held for sale

Accumulated amortisation and impairment

INTELLECTUAL 
PROPERTY I)

CUSTOMER 
LIST II)

DEVELOPMENT 
COSTS III)

TOTAL

SOFTWARE 
LICENSES 
IV)

$’000

$’000

$’000

$’000

$’000

585

21

10,642

19

11,267

–

–

–

–

(369)

216

1,848

(1,632)

216

(21)

–

–

–

213

(213)

–

3,259

–

–

(4,600)

(2,419)

6,882

–

–

1

–

(8)

12

3,259

(21)

1

(4,600)

(2,796)

7,110

16,522

(9,640)

6,882

282

18,865

(270)

(11,755)

12

7,110

1,554

77

11,884

18

13,533

–

–

–

(367)

–

(232)

(370)

585

3,006

(367)

(2,054)

–

–

–

(3)

–

(53)

21

213

–

(192)

3,347

–

–

(1,902)

–

(333)

–

11

–

–

(1)

–

3,347

11

–

(2,269)

(4)

(565)

(2,354)

(9)

(2,786)

10,642

19

11,267

20,294

(1,902)

(7,750)

448

23,961

–

(2,269)

(429)

(10,425)

Net carrying amount

585

21

10,642

19

11,267

i)  Intellectual Property was acquired 

in 2009 through the Visage 
Imaging business combination 
and is carried at cost less 
accumulated amortisation. Three 
separately identifiable intangible 
assets, in the form of software 
intellectual property, have 
been identified in the business 
acquisition of Visage Imaging; 
Visage CS, Visage PACS and 
Amira. The carrying amounts are 
Visage CS ($180,579) and Visage 
PACS ($34,986), while Amira has 
been sold and is a discontinued 
operation (refer Note 8). These 
intangible assets have been 
assessed as having a finite life 
and are amortised using the 
straight line method over a  
period of 5 years, commencing 
February 2009.

ii)  A Customer List was acquired in 
2009 through the Visage Imaging 
business combination and has 
since been sold with the Amira 
discontinued operation (refer 
Note 8).

iii) Development costs have been 

capitalised at cost. This intangible 
asset has been assessed 
as having a finite life and is 
amortised using the straight line 
method over a period of 5 years. 
As at 30 June 2013 the carrying 
values of capitalised development 
costs are Visage CS ($3,843,521) 
RIS ($2,428,846) and Visage 
PACS ($609,504), all sit within  
the Australian operating segment.

The Group undertook an impairment 
assessment of the capitalised 
development costs as at 31 
December 2012. The recoverable 
amount of development costs 
have been determined based on 
a value in use calculation using 
cash flow projections from financial 
budgets approved by the Board 
of Directors covering a five-year 
period. The projected cash flows 
were updated to reflect the change in 
forecast revenues to a pay per view 
(operational) model, thereby reducing 
the forecasted revenue from previous 
periods and a post tax discount 
rate of 20% (30 June 2012:18%) 

was applied. Cash flows beyond a 5 
year period have been extrapolated 
using a 2.5% growth rate (30 June 
2012:2.5%). All other assumptions 
remained consistent with those 
disclosed in Note 2s. As a result 
of the updated analysis, the Group 
recognised an impairment charge at 
31 December 2012 of $4,600,000 
against the Capitalised Development 
costs (RIS - $870,000, Visage PACS 
- $3,300,000, MagicWeb - $430,000). 
The Group undertook an impairment 
assessment at 30 June 2013 and 
no further impairment charges were 
recorded at this date.

Key assumptions used in 
value in use calculations
The calculation of value in use for 
development costs is most sensitive 
to the following assumptions:

- Revenue forecasts

- Discount rates

- Growth rates used to extrapolate 
cash flows beyond the forecast 
period

Revenue forecasts – Revenue 
forecasts are based on current 
year consolidated budgets for each 
geographical segment. Estimated 
growth rates are then used to 
forecast the following four years 
revenue for each product used in 
each geographical segment. Total 
forecast segment growth rates range 
from (22%) to 186% across the 4 
year period.

Discount rates – Discount rates 
represent the current market 
assessment of risks specific to 
each cash generating unit (CGU), 
taking into consideration the time 
value of money and individual risks 
of the underlying assets that have 
not been incorporated in the cash 
flow estimates. The discount rate 
calculation is based on the specific 
circumstances of the Group and its 
operating segments and is derived 
from its weighted average return on 
assets (WARA). The WARA takes 
into account the cost of equity from 
expected return on investments by 
the Groups investors, whilst there 

is no debt for the group to take into 
account.

Specific risk is associated with 
the intangible asset nature and is 
incorporated by applying individual 
beta factors, which are evaluated 
annually.

Growth rate estimates – rates are 
based on industry based customer 
price index (CPI) forecasts. The long 
term rate of 2.5% was used in the 
current assessment.

Sensitivity to changes in 
assumptions
With regard to the assessment of 
value in use of development costs, 
the estimated recoverable amount 
is equal to its carrying value and 
consequently, any adverse change 
in key assumptions could result in 
a further impairment loss. The key 
assumptions for the recoverable 
amounts are discussed below:

Growth rate assumption – Rates are 
based on management’s estimated 
revenue forecast for the next 5 
year period for each geographical 
segment. The revised growth rates 
reflect a move towards operational 
revenue forecast thereby reducing 
the forecasted revenue from 
previous periods, however given 
the economic uncertainty, further 
reductions to growth estimates may 
be necessary in the future, resulting 
in further impairment.

Discount rates – The discount 
rate has been adjusted to reflect 
the current market assessment of 
the risks specific to the intangible 
assets and was estimated based on 
weighted average return on assets 
of the company. Further changes to 
the discount rate may be necessary 
in the future to reflect changing risks 
for the industry and changes to the 
weighted average return on assets. 
An increase in the discount rate may 
result in further impairment.

iv) Software Licences have been 
assessed as having a finite life and 
are amortised using the straight line 
method over a period of 4 years.

50     Annual Report 2013

51    

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS cont.

16. TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES (CURRENT)

NOTES

Trade payables

Other payables and accruals

Liabilities directly associated with the assets classified as held for sale

Deferred Income

CONSOLIDATED

2013

$’000

199

629

828

–

218

1,046

2012

$’000

454

730

1,184

(264)

788

1,708

(i) Trade payables are non-interest bearing and are normally settled on 30-day terms.

(ii) Other payables, other than inter-company payables are non-interest bearing and have an average term of 30 days.

Fair value approximates carrying value due to the short term nature of trade and other payables.

17. PROVISIONS 
Current

Long service leave

Annual leave

Non Current

Long service leave

487

823

453

771

1,310

1,224

24

24

31

31

i)  Long Service Leave 

Refer to note 2 (u)(ii) for the relevant accounting policy and a discussion of the significant estimations and 
assumptions applied in the measurement of this provision.

18. CONTRIBUTED EQUITY AND RESERVES

NOTES

(i) Ordinary shares

Cancellation for share buy-back

Issued and fully paid

Fully paid ordinary shares carry one vote per share and carry the right to dividends

CONSOLIDATED

2013

$’000

327 

–

327

(ii) Movements in shares on issue

At 1 July 2012

Cancellation for share buy-back

Issued for cash on exercise of options

 At 30 June 2013

At 1 July 2011

Cancellation for share buy-back

Issued for cash on exercise of options

At 30 June 2012

52     Annual Report 2013

NUMBER OF SHARES

100,263,406 

–

–

100,263,406

NUMBER OF SHARES

100,280,000

(16,594)

–

100,263,406                   

2012

$’000

330

(3)

327

$’000

327

–

–

327

$’000

330

(3)

–

327

Share Reserve (i) 

Balance at 1 July

Share options expensed

Balance at 30 June

Foreign Currency Translation Reserve (ii)

Balance at 1 July

Foreign Currency Movement

Balance at 30 June

Retained Earnings

Balance at 1 July

Net profit for the year

Dividends

Balance at 30 June

NOTES

CONSOLIDATED

2013

$’000

172

54

226

(1,681)

1,777

96

17,184

5,131

(2,005)

20,310

2012

$’000

122

50

172

(1,148)

(533)

(1,681)

15,894

1,791

(501)

17,184

(i) Share Reserve

19. SHARE BASED PAYMENT PLAN

The share reserve is used to record 
the value of share based payments 
provided to employees, including 
KMP,  as part of their remuneration. 
Refer to note 19 for further details of 
these plans.

(ii)  Foreign Currency translation 
reserve

The foreign currency translation 
reserve is used to record  exchange 
differences arising from the 
translation of the financial statements 
of foreign subsidiaries and for 
exchange differences arising from 
long term loan accounts resulting  
from net investment in subsidiaries.

Capital Management
When managing capital, 
management’s objective is to ensure 
the entity continues as a going 
concern as well as to maintain 
optimal returns to shareholders 
and benefits for other stakeholders. 
Management also aims to maintain 
a capital structure that ensures the 
lowest cost of capital available to 
the entity.

Management review the capital 
structure to take advantage of 
favourable costs of capital or 
high returns on assets. As the 
market is constantly changing, 
management may change the 
amount of dividends to be paid 
to shareholders, return capital to 
shareholders, or issue new shares.

During the year,  the company paid 
dividends of $2,005,268 (2012: 
$501,400).

Employee Share Option Scheme
An employee share incentive scheme was established on 25th August 
2000 whereby directors and staff of the Company were issued with options 
over the ordinary shares of Pro Medicus Limited. The options, issued for nil 
consideration, had an exercise price of $1.15 and 2,100,000 share options 
expired under the scheme on 25 August 2010. Options vested at 20% per 
annum commencing on the first anniversary of issue. The options cannot be 
transferred and will not be quoted on the ASX.

200,000 shares were granted as options to Peter Kempen on becoming a 
Director of the company in 2008 under a separate agreement. The options had 
a grant date of 12 March 2008 and an exercise price of $1.25. The fair value of 
the options at grant date was $40,852 ($0.13–$0.29 per option). The options 
have a first exercise date of 12 March 2009 and can be exercised at anytime 
through to expiry date of 12 March 2018. The options vest over a 5 year period 
on completion of service. At reporting date all options had vested. No options 
were exercised during the year.

900,000 shares were granted as options to key Visage Imaging employees 
under a separate agreement. The options had a grant date of 1 April 2010 
and an exercise price of $1.00. The fair value of the options at grant date was 
$67,278 ($0.07 per option). The options have a first exercise date of 1 April 2011 
and can be exercised at anytime through to expiry date of 1 April 2020. The 
options vest over a 5 year period on completion of service. At reporting date 
435,000 (48%) options had vested and 175,000 (19%) options had expired. No 
options were exercised during the year.

550,000 shares were granted as options to Key Executives under a separate 
agreement. The options had a grant date of 25 August 2010 and an exercise 
price of $1.00. The fair value of the options at grant date was $54,109 ($0.10 
per option). The options have a first exercise date of 25 August 2011 and can 
be exercised at anytime through to expiry date of 25 August 2020. The options 
vest over a 5 year period on completion of service. At reporting date 220,000 
(40%) options had vested. No options were exercised during the year.

200,000 shares were granted as options to Roderick Lyle on becoming a 
Director of the company in 2011 under a separate agreement. The options had 
a grant date of 18 November 2011 and an exercise price of $0.55. The fair value 
of the options at grant date was $45,116 ($0.23 per option). The options have 
a first exercise date of 18 November 2012 and can be exercised at anytime 
through to expiry date of 18 November 2021. The options vest over a 5 year 
period on completion of service. At reporting date 40,000 (20%) options had 
vested. No options were exercised during the year.

53    

 
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS cont.

Information with respect to the number of options granted under the employee share option scheme is as follows:

NUMBER OF 
OPTIONS

2013

WEIGHTED 
AVERAGE 
EXERCISE PRICE

Outstanding at the beginning of the year

1,675,000

– granted

– forfeited

– exercised

– expired

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

Outstanding at the end of the year

Exercisable at end of year

1,675,000

895,000

$0.98

$0.98

NUMBER OF 
OPTIONS

1,850,000

200,000

–

–

375,000

1,675,000

570,000

2012

WEIGHTED 
AVERAGE 
EXERCISE PRICE

$0.55

–

–

$1.16

$0.98

$1.07

All options above have been recognised in accordance with AASB 2 as the options were granted after 7 November 2002.

The outstanding balance as at 30 June 2013 is represented by:

 ▶ 200,000 options over ordinary shares with an exercise price of $1.25 each, exercisable until 12 March 2018

 ▶ 725,000 options over ordinary share with an exercise price of $1.00 each, exercisable until 1 April 2020

 ▶ 550,000 options over ordinary share with an exercise price of $1.00 each, exercisable until 25 August 2020

 ▶ 200,000 options over ordinary shares with an exercise price of $0.55 each, exercisable until 18 November 2021

Weighted average remaining contractual life 
The weighted average remaining contractual life for share options outstanding at 30 June 2013 is 6.94 years

(2012: 7.94 Years).

Range of exercise price
The range of exercise prices for options outstanding at the end of the year was $0.55 – $1.25 (2012: $0.55 – $1.25).

Weighted average fair value
The weighted average fair value of options granted during the year was nil (2012: $0.23).

Option pricing model
The fair value of the equity-settled share options granted is estimated as at the date of the grant using a Black

Scholes Model taking into account the terms and conditions upon which the options were granted.

The following table lists the inputs to the models used for the year ended 30 June 2013:

2013

Dividend yield

Expected volatility*

Risk–free interest rate

Expected life of options

Option exercise price

Weighted average share price at measurement date

nil 

nil 

nil

nil

nil

nil 

2012

3.91%

40.0%

6.0%

10 years

$1.00

$0.57

*The expected volatility rate was calculated measuring the standard deviation between the historical share price 
movements for the past 12 months.

Performance Rights
A long term incentive plan was established on 18th November 2011 whereby Senior Executives of Group were offered 
performance rights over the ordinary shares of Pro Medicus Limited. The performance rights, issued for nil consideration, 
are offered for a 5 year period and vest 3 years after granting date on completion of service. The performance rights cannot 
be transferred and will not be quoted on the ASX. This long term incentive plan includes performance hurdles related to the 
company and vesting conditions relating to the employee’s period of service.

At reporting date 387,000 performance rights had been granted during the year. The performance rights had a grant date of  
1 July 2012 and vest over 3 years on completion of service. The fair value of the performance rights at grant date was $96,750 
($0.25 per performance right).

Performance rights pricing model
The fair value of the equity-settled performance rights granted is estimated as at the date of the grant using a Black Scholes 
Model taking into account the terms and conditions upon which the performance rights were granted.

The following table lists the inputs to the models used for the year ended 30 June 2013:

Dividend yield

Expected volatility*

Risk–free interest rate

Expected life of options

Option exercise price

Weighted average share price at measurement date

2013

5.66%

70%

5%

3 years

$0.00

$0.25

2012

nil 

nil 

nil

nil

nil

nil 

*The expected volatility rate was calculated measuring the standard deviation between the historical share price movements for 
the past 12 months.

20 COMMITMENTS  

a) Operating lease commitments – Group as lessee

The Parent has entered into a commercial property lease for office premises. This lease has a life of 5 years with an 
option for a further 5 year period. There is no restriction placed upon the lessee by entering into this lease. The US 
operations have entered into a commercial property lease for office premises from 1 May 2010 for a 5 year period. 
The German operations have entered into a commercial property lease for office premises and can give notice to 
vacate 3 months prior to 30 April each year, whereby they sign into another 12 months. The German operations also 
have several motor vehicles leases which expire at various stages between August 2012 and February 2015.

Future minimum rentals payable under non–cancellable operating lease 
as at 30 June are as follows:

– Within one year 

– After one year and not more than five years

– After more than five years

NOTES

CONSOLIDATED

2013

$’000

372

777

–

2012

$’000

367

805

–

1,149

1,172

21 EVENTS AFTER THE BALANCE SHEET DATE

On 23 August 2013, the directors of Pro Medicus Limited declared a final dividend on ordinary shares in respect of the 
2013 financial year. This dividend comprises a normal dividend of 1.0 cents per share. The total amount of the dividend 
is $1,002,634 which represents a fully franked dividend of a total of 1.0 cents per share. The dividend has not been 
provided for in the 30 June 2013 financial statements.

54     Annual Report 2013

55    

 
 
 
 
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS cont.

22. AUDITOR’S REMUNERATION 

NOTES

Amounts received or due and receivable by Ernst & Young (Australia) for:

 – an audit or review of the financial report of the Company and any 

other entity in the Consolidated Group

 – other services in relation to the Company or Group

Amounts received or due and receivable by related practices of Ernst 
& Young (Australia):

 – audit of the financial report of Visage Imaging GmbH

23. KEY MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL
(a) Compensation for key management personnel

Short–term employee benefits

Post–employment benefits

Other long–term benefits

Share–based payment

Total compensation

(b) Option holdings of Key Management Personnel

CONSOLIDATED

2013

$’000

2012

$’000

135,300 

132,500

64,080 

21,130

199,380 

153,630

63,410 

63,500

262,790 

217,130

1,597,100

1,029,072

93,466

4,817

36,791

93,531

4,830

39,152

1,732,174

1,166,585

OPTIONS 
EXERCISED

NET CHANGE 
OTHER

BALANCE AT 
BEGINNING OF 
YEAR
1 JULY 2012

GRANTED AS 
REMU– 
NERATION

30 JUNE 2013

Directors 

P T Kempen

200,000

S A Hupert

A B Hall

R Lyle
Executives

D Tauber

M Westerhoff

B Levin
Total

–

–

200,000

350,000

350,000

–
1,100,000

# Includes forfeitures

–

–

–

-

–

–

–
–

–

–

–

-

–

–

–
–

BALANCE 
AT END OF 
YEAR
30 JUNE 
2013

200,000

–

–

NOT VESTED

VESTED

TOTAL

–

–

–

200,000

200,000

–

–

–

–

200,000

160,000

40,000

200,000

350,000

350,000

–
–
– 1,100,000

210,000

140,000

–
510,000

140,000

210,000

–
590,000

350,000

350,000

-
1,100,000

BALANCE AT 
BEGINNING OF 
YEAR
1 JULY 2011

GRANTED AS 
REMU– 
NERATION

30 JUNE 2012

Directors 

P T Kempen

200,000

S A Hupert

A B Hall

R Lyle
Executives

D Tauber

M Westerhoff

B Levin
Total

–

–

–

350,000

350,000

–
900,000

–

–

–

200,000

–

–

–
200,000

# Includes forfeitures

56     Annual Report 2013

OPTIONS 
EXERCISED

NET CHANGE 
OTHER

BALANCE 
AT END OF 
YEAR
30 JUNE 
2012

NOT VESTED

VESTED

TOTAL

–

–

–

–

–

–

–
–

–

–

–

–

200,000

200,000

–

–

–

–

–

200,000

350,000

350,000

–
–
– 1,100,000

280,000

210,000

–
720,000

70,000

140,000

–
380,000

350,000

350,000

–
1,100,000

#

–

–

–

-

–

–

#

–

–

–

–

–

–

(c) Shareholdings of Key Management Personnel

SHARES HELD IN PRO 
MEDICUS LIMITED 
(NUMBER)

30 JUNE 2013

Directors 

P T Kempen

S A Hupert

A B Hall

R Lyle
Executives

D Tauber

M Westerhoff

B Levin
Total

BALANCE  
1 JULY 2012

ORDINARY

GRANTED AS 
REMUNERATION

ON EXERCISE OF 
OPTIONS 

ORDINARY

ORDINARY

NET CHANGE  
OTHER

ORDINARY

BALANCE  
30 JUNE 2013

ORDINARY

328,082

30,072,660

30,068,500

100,000

150,000

–

–
60,719,242

–

–

–

–

–

–

–
–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–
–

50,000*

–

–

378,082

30,072,660

30,068,500

40,000*

140,000

–

–

–
90,000

150,000

–

–
60,809,242

*Peter Kempen purchased 50,000 shares throughout the year on the prevailing market  share price and  
 Roderick Lyle purchased 40,000 shares throughout the year on the prevailing market  share price.

SHARES HELD IN PRO 
MEDICUS LIMITED 
(NUMBER)

30 JUNE 2012

Directors 

P T Kempen

S A Hupert

A B Hall

R Lyle

Executives

D Tauber

M Westerhoff

B Levin

Total

BALANCE  
1 JULY 2011

ORDINARY

GRANTED AS 
REMUNERATION

ON EXERCISE OF 
OPTIONS 

ORDINARY

ORDINARY

NET CHANGE  
OTHER

ORDINARY

BALANCE 
30 JUNE 2012 

ORDINARY

169,647

30,072,660

30,068,500

47,987

150,000

–

–

60,508,794

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

158,435*

328,082

–

–

30,072,660

30,068,500

52,013*

100,000

–

–

–

150,000

–

–

210,448

60,719,24

*Peter Kempen purchased 158,435 shares throughout the year  on the prevailing market  share price and  
 Roderick Lyle purchased 52,013 shares throughout the year  on the prevailing market  share price.

(d) Performance Rights

A long term incentive plan was established during 2011–12 whereby  Senior Executives of Group were offered 
performance rights over the ordinary shares of Pro Medicus Limited.  The performance rights, issued for nil 
consideration, are offered for a 5 year period and vest 3 years after granting date  on completion of service. This 
long term incentive plan includes performance hurdles related to the company and vesting  conditions relating to the 
employee’s period of service. Refer to Note 19.

(e) Loans to Key Management Personnel

No loans are made to Key Management Personnel or staff.

Purchases
During the year lease payments of $169,476 (2012: $169,476) in respect of the Group’s operating premises at 450 
Swan Street Richmond were paid to Champagne Properties Pty. Ltd., an entity controlled by S. Hupert and A. Hall. 
Commercial arrangements on an ‘arms length basis’ have been determined by an independent assessment of rental 
and lease terms.

57    

200,000

30,000

170,000

200,000

(f) Other transactions and balances with Key Management Personnel

 
26. PARENT ENTITY INFORMATION

INFORMATION RELATING TO PRO MEDICUS LIMITED

Current  assets

Total assets

Current  Liabilities

Total Liabilities

Issued capital

Retained Earnings

Foreign Currency Translation Reserve

Share Reserve

Total shareholders equity

Profit/(loss)  of the parent entity

Total comprehensive income  of parent entity

2013 
$000

26,386

34,236

20,207

21,145

327

13,855

(1,317)

226

13,091

(1,689)

(1,689)

2012 
$000

15,841

24,487

6,492

7,757

327

16,231

–

172

16,730

980

980

The parent entity has not entered into any guarantees in relation to the debts of its subsidiaries. There are no 
contingent liabilities held against the parent entity. The parent entity does not have any contractual commitments for 
the acquisition of property, plant and equipment.

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS cont.

24. RELATED PARTY DISCLOSURE

(a) Subsidiaries

The consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of Pro Medicus Limited and the subsidiaries 
listed in the following table.

NAME

Promed (USA) Pty Ltd

PME IP Australia Pty Ltd

Visage Imaging (Aust) Pty Ltd

Pro Medicus (USA) LLC

Visage Imaging Inc

Visage Imaging GmbH

COUNTRY OF 
INCORPORATION

Australia

Australia

Australia

United States

United States

Germany

% EQUITY INTEREST

INVESTMENT $000

2013

100

100

100

100

100

100

2012

100

100

100

100

100

100

2013

2012

–

–

–

–

2,389

3,638

6,027

–

–

–

–

2,389

3,638

6,027

(b) Ultimate parent

Pro Medicus Limited is the ultimate Australian parent entity and the ultimate parent of the Group.

(c) Key management personnel

Details relating to KMPs, including remuneration paid, are included in note 23.

(d) Transactions with related parties

The following table provides the total amount of transactions that were entered into with related parties for the 
relevant financial year (for information regarding outstanding balances on related party trade receivables and 
payables at year–end. 

SALES TO 
RELATED

$000

Related party

Consolidated

Champagne Properties Pty Ltd – Rental lease 2013

Champagne Properties Pty Ltd – Rental lease 2012

–

–

PURCHASES FROM 
RELATED PARTIES

OTHER TRANSACTIONS 
WITH RELATED PARTIES 

$000

169

169

$000

–

–

Terms and conditions of transactions with related parties
Sales to and purchases from related parties are made in arm’s length transactions both at normal market prices and 
on normal commercial terms.

Outstanding balances at year end are unsecured, interest free and payable on demand. 

Entities within the group that own the Intellectual Property earn a 50% royalty from the sales made by other entities 
within the group.

Development costs undertaken by the German operations are reimbursed by the parent on commercial terms.

25. CONTINGENCIES

Tax related contingencies
Amended assessments from the Australian Taxation Office (ATO)
As a result of the ATO’s program of routine and regular tax audit, the Group anticipates that ATO audits may occur in 
the future. The Group is similarly subject to routine tax audits in certain overseas jurisdictions. The ultimate outcome 
of any future tax audits cannot be determined with an acceptable degree of reliability at this time. Newvertheless, 
the Group believes that it is making adequate provision for its taxation liabilities (including amounts shown as 
deferred and current tax liabilities) and is taking reasonable steps to address potentially contentious issues with 
the ATO. However, there may be an impact to the Group of any of the revenue authority investigations results in an 
adjustment that increases the Group’s taxation liabilities.

Ongoing transactions – transfer pricing
The Group has offshore operations in the United States and Germany (note 24). As disclosed in note 24, there are 
extra Group transactions, which include the Company and its US and German based subsidiaries Visage Imaging 
Inc and Visage Imaging GmbH and Pro Medicus Limited. These transactions are on an arm’s length basis and are 
conducted at normal market prices and on normal commercial terms.

Whilst there are no investigations currently in progress, such transactions are not subject to any statutory limit 
in Australia. 

58     Annual Report 2013

59    

DIRECTORS’  
DECLARATION

In accordance with a resolution of the directors of Pro Medicus Limited, I state that:

(1) In the opinion of the directors:

(a) 

the financial statements, notes and the additional disclosures included in the directors’ report designated  
as audited, of the consolidated entity are in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, including:

(i) 

(ii) 

giving a true and fair view of the consolidated entity’s financial position as at 30 June 2013 and  
of the performance for the year ended on that date; and 

complying with Accounting Standards (including the Australian Accounting Interpretations)  
and the Corporations Regulations 2001; and

(b) 

(c) 

there are reasonable grounds to believe that the consolidated entity will be able to pay its debts as and  
when they become due and payable.

the financial statements and notes comply with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as  
disclosed in Note 2(b).

(2) This declaration has been made after receiving the declarations required to be made to the directors in    
     accordance with section 295A of the Corporations Act 2001 for the financial year ended 30 June 2013. 

On behalf of the Board

P T Kempen

Chairman

Melbourne, 23 August 2013

I

T
D
U
A

T
N
E
D
N
E
P
E
D
N

I

T
R
O
P
E
R

60     Annual Report 2013

61    

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
INDEPENDENT AUDIT 
REPORT

Ernst & Young 
8 Exhibition Street 
Melbourne  VIC  3000   Australia 
GPO  Box 67  Melbourne  VIC  3001 

Tel: +61  3 9288  8000 
Fax:  +61  3 8650  7777 
ey.com/au 

Independent auditor's report  to  the  members of  Pro Medicus  Limited 

Report on  the financial report 

We have  audited the accompanying financial report  of Pro  Medicus  Limited  which  comprises the 
consolidated statement of financial position as  at 30  June 2013, the consolidated statement of 
comprehensive income, the consolidated statement of changes in equity and  the consolidated 
statement of  cash  flows  for  the year then ended, notes comprising a  summary of significant 
accounting policies  and  other explanatory information, and  the directors' declaration of  the 
consolidated entity comprising the company and  the entities it controlled at the year's end  or  from 
time to time during the  financial year. 

Directors' responsibility for the  financial report 

The  directors of the company are  responsible for  the preparation of the  financial report  that  gives  a 
true and  fair  view  in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards and  the  Corporations Act 
2001 and  for  such  internal controls as  the directors determine are  necessary to enable the 
preparation of the  financial report  that  is free  from  material misstatement, whether due  to fraud or 
error. In Note 2,  the directors also  state, in accordance with Accounting Standard AASB 101 
Presentation of Financial  Statements, that the financial statements comply  with International 
Financial Reporting  Standards. 

Auditor's responsibility 

Our  responsibility is to express an  opinion  on  the  financial report  based  on  our  audit. We conducted 
our  audit in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards. Those  standards require that we  comply 
with relevant ethical requirements relating to audit engagements and  plan  and  perform the audit  to 
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial report  is free  from  material misstatement. 

An audit  involves performing procedures to obtain audit  evidence about the amounts and 
disclosures in the  financial report. The  procedures selected depend on  the auditor's judgment, 
including the assessment of  the risks  of material misstatement of the  financial report, whether due 
to fraud or  error. In making  those risk  assessments, the auditor considers internal controls relevant 
to the entity's preparation and  fair  presentation of the  financial report  in order to design audit 
procedures that are  appropriate in the circumstances, but not for  the purpose of expressing an 
opinion  on  the effectiveness of the entity's internal controls. An audit  also  includes evaluating the 
appropriateness of accounting policies  used and  the reasonableness of  accounting estimates made 
by  the directors, as  well as  evaluating the overall presentation of the  financial report. 

We believe that the audit  evidence we  have  obtained is sufficient and  appropriate to provide a  basis 
for  our  audit opinion. 

Independence 

In conducting our  audit we  have  complied with the  independence requirements of the Corporations 
Act  2001.  We have  given  to the directors of  the company a written Auditor’s Independence 
Declaration, a  copy  of  which  follows  in the directors’ report. 

Opinion 

In our  opinion: 

a.  

the  financial report  of  Pro  Medicus  Limited is in accordance with the  Corporations Act 
2001, including: 

i 

ii 

giving  a  true and  fair  view  of the consolidated entity's financial position as  at 30  June 
2013 and  of its performance for  the year ended on  that date; and 

complying with Australian Accounting Standards and  the  Corporations Regulations 
2001; and 

b.  

the  financial report  also  complies with International Financial Reporting Standards as 
disclosed in Note 2. 

Report on  the remuneration report 

We have  audited the Remuneration Report included in pages 7-10 of the directors' report for  the 
year ended 30  June 2013. The  directors of  the company are  responsible for  the preparation and 
presentation of  the Remuneration Report in accordance with section 300A of the  Corporations Act 
2001. Our  responsibility is to express an  opinion  on  the Remuneration Report, based on  our  audit 
conducted in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards. 

Opinion 

In our  opinion, the Remuneration Report of Pro  Medicus  Limited for  the year ended 30  June 2013, 
complies with section 300A of the Corporations Act 2001. 

Ernst & Young 

David Petersen 
Partner 
Melbourne 

23  August 2013 

62     Annual Report 2013

63    

A member firm of Ernst & Young  Global Limited 

Liability limited by a  scheme approved under  Professional Standards Legis lation 

53 

54 

A member firm of Ernst & Young  Global Limited 

Liability limited by a  scheme approved under  Professional Standards Legis lation 

	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
 
	
  
 
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
	
  
ASX ADDITITIONAL
INFORMATION

Additional information required by the Australian Stock Exchange Ltd and not shown elsewhere in this report is  
as follows. 

(a)  Distribution of equity securities

The number of shareholders, by size of holding, in each class of share are:

1 – 1,000

1,001 – 5,000

5,001 – 10,000

10,001 – 100,000

100,001

and Over

ORDINARY SHARES

NUMBER OF 
HOLDERS

NUMBER OF 
SHARES

137 

334 

219 

289 

48

90,434

1,008,984

1,761,430

8,317,942

89,084,616

1,027 

100,263,406

The number of shareholders holding less than a marketable parcel are:

153

108,522

(b)  Twenty largest shareholders

The names of the twenty largest holders of quoted shares are:

1 Dr S Hupert (multiple shareholdings)

2 Mr A Hall (multiple shareholdings)

3 RBC Dexia Investor Services Australia Nominees P/L 

4 Citicorp Nominees Pty Ltd

5 Aust Executor Nominees Pty Ltd

6 BNP Parabis Nominees Pty Ltd

7 Equitas Nominees Pty Ltd

8 Brazil Farming Pty Ltd

9 Dr Russell Kay Hancock

10 Mr Bram Vander Jagt

11 Mr Timothy John Hannigan & Mrs Kerrie Helen Hannigan

12 Mr Alan Graham Rochford

13 Mr Ralph Ronald Stadus & Ms Denise Leslie Stadus

14 Mr Peter Terence Kempen & Mrs Elaine Margaret Kempen

15 Mr Evan Philip Clucas & Ms Leanne Jane Weston

16 Mr John Charles Plummer

17 Mr Stephen Geoffrey Wilson & Ms Denise Adele Prandi

18 Mr Colin Gregory Organ

19 Indicorp Consulting Group Pty Ltd

20 Mr Peter Propert Birrell & Mrs Dinny Mary Birrell

LISTED ORDINARY 
SHARES

PERCENTAGE OF  
ORDINARY SHARES

29.99%

29.99%

8.25%

6.17%

1.99%

1.57%

0.78%

0.66%

0.65%

0.60%

0.53%

0.46%

0.45%

0.38%

0.37%

0.36%

0.34%

0.27%

0.25%

0.23% 

84.30%

NUMBER 
OF 
 SHARES

30,072,660

30,068,500

8,275,528

6,187,247

2,000,000

1,577,605

783,250

660,000

650,000

600,000

530,000

464,052

455,556

378,082

368,217

365,000

337,537

271,000

250,000

232,000

84,526,234

(c)  Substantial shareholders

The names of substantial shareholders who have notified the Company in accordance with section 671B  
of the Corporations Law are:

S. Hupert

A Hall

Perpetual Limited RBC Dexia Investor Services Australia Nominees P/L 

Commonwealth Bank of Australia

(d)  Voting rights

All ordinary shares carry one vote per share without restriction.

NUMBER OF SHARES

30,072,660

30,068,500

8,275,528

6,187,247

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 
STATEMENT
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2013

The Board of Directors of Pro Medicus Limited is responsible for the corporate governance of the entity having 
regard to the ASX Corporate Governance Council (CGC) published guidelines as well as its corporate governance 
principles and recommendations. The Board guides and monitors the business and affairs of Pro Medicus Limited 
on behalf of the shareholders by whom they are elected and to whom they are accountable.

The table below summaries the Group’s compliance with the CGC’s recommendations. 

RECOMMENDATION

COMPLY 
YES/NO

REFERENCE/
EXPLANATION

ASX LISTING 
RULE/CGC 
RECOMMENDATIONS

Principle 1 
Lay solid foundations for management and 
oversight

Companies should establish the functions reserved to 
the board and those delegated to senior executives 
and disclose those functions

Companies should disclose the process for evaluating 
the performance of senior executives.

Yes

Page 70

ASX CGC 1.1

Yes

Page 68

ASX CGC 1.2

Companies should provide the information indicated in 
the guide to reporting on Principle 1.

Yes

ASX CGC 1.3

Principle 2 
Structure the board to add value

A majority of the board should be independent 
directors.

The chair should be an independent director.

The roles of chair and chief executive officer (CEO) 
should not be exercised by the same individual.

The board should establish a nomination committee.

Companies should disclose the process for evaluating 
the performance of the board, its committees and 
individual directors.

Companies should provide the information indicated in 
the guide to reporting on Principle 2.

Yes

Page 68

ASX CGC 2.1

Page 68

Page 68

Page 69

Page 68

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

ASX CGC 2.2

ASX CGC 2.3

ASX CGC 2.4

ASX CGC 2.5

ASX CGC 2.6

1.1

1.2

1.3

2.1

2.2

2.3

2.4

2.5

2.6

64     Annual Report 2013

65    

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT cont.

RECOMMENDATION

COMPLY 
YES/NO

REFERENCE/
EXPLANATION

ASX LISTING 
RULE/CGC 
RECOMMENDATIONS

Principle 3 
Promote ethical and responsible decision–making

3.1

Companies should establish a code of conduct and 
disclose the code or a summary of the code as to:

Yes

Page 69

ASX CGC 3.1

 ▶ The practices necessary to maintain confidence 

in the company’s integrity.

 ▶ The practices necessary to take into account 
their legal obligations and the reasonable 
expectations of their stakeholders.

 ▶ The responsibility and accountability of 

individuals for reporting and investigating 
reports of unethical practices.

Companies should establish a policy concerning 
diversity and disclose the policy or a summary of 
that policy.  The policy should include requirements 
for the board to establish measureable objectives for 
achieving gender diversity for the board to assess 
annually both the objectives and progress in achieving 
them.

Companies should disclose in each annual report the 
measureable objectives for achieving gender diversity 
set by the board in accordance with the diversity 
policy and progress towards achieving them.

Companies should disclose in each annual report 
the proportion of women employees in the whole 
organization, women in senior executive positions and 
women on the board.

Yes

Page 68

ASX CGC 3.2

Yes

Page 69

ASX CGC 3.3

Yes

Page 69

ASX CGC 3.4

Companies should provide the information indicated in 
the guide to reporting on Principle 3.

Yes

ASX CGC 3.5

Principle 4  
Safeguard integrity in financial reporting

The board should establish an audit committee.

Yes

Page 69

ASX CGC 4.1

The audit committee should be structured so that it:
 ▶ Consists only of non-executive directors.
 ▶ Consists of a majority of independent directors.
 ▶ Is chaired by an independent chair, who is not 

chair of the board.

 ▶ Has at least three members.

The audit committee should have a formal charter.

Companies should provide the information indicated in 
the guide to reporting on Principle 4.

Principle 5 
Make timely and balanced disclosure

Companies should establish written policies designed 
to ensure compliance with ASX Listing Rule disclosure 
requirements and to ensure accountability at a senior 
executive level for that compliance and disclose those 
policies or a summary of those policies.

ASX CGC 4.2

No

Yes

Yes

Page 69

ASX LR 12.7

Page 69

ASX CGC 4.3

ASX CGC 4.4

Yes

Page 70

ASX CGC 5.1

3.2

3.3

3.4

3.5

4.1

4.2

4.3

4.4

5.1

RECOMMENDATION

COMPLY 
YES/NO

REFERENCE/
EXPLANATION

5.2

Companies should provide the information indicated in 
the guide to reporting on Principle 5.

Yes

ASX LISTING 
RULE/CGC 
RECOMMENDATIONS

ASX CGC 5.2

Principle 6 
Respect the rights of shareholders

6.1

Companies should design a communications policy for 
promoting effective communication with shareholders 
and encouraging their participation at general 
meetings and disclose their policy or a summary of 
that policy.

Yes

Page 70

ASX CGC 6.1

6.2

Companies should provide the information indicated in 
the guide to reporting on Principle 6.

Yes

ASX CGC 6.2

7.1

7.2

7.3

Principle 7 
Recognise and manage risk

Companies should establish policies for the oversight 
and management of material business risks and 
disclose a summary of those policies.

The board should require management to design and 
implement the risk management and internal control 
system to manage the company's material business 
risks and report to it on whether those risks are being 
managed effectively. The board should disclose that 
management has reported to it as to the effectiveness 
of the company's management of its material business 
risks.

The board should disclose whether it has received 
assurance from the CEO [or equivalent] and the 
Chief Financial Officer (CFO) [or equivalent] that the 
declaration provided in accordance with section 295A 
of the Corporations Act is founded on a sound system 
of risk management and internal control and that the 
system is operating effectively in all material respects 
in relation to financial reporting risks.

Yes

Page 70

ASX CGC 7.1

Yes

Page 70

ASX CGC 7.2

Yes

Page 70

ASX CGC 7.3

7.4

Companies should provide the information indicated in 
the guide to reporting on Principle 7.

Yes

ASX CGC 7.4

Principle 8 
Remunerate fairly and responsibly

8.1

8.2

8.3

The board should establish a remuneration committee.

Companies should clearly distinguish the structure 
of non-executive directors' remuneration from that of 
executive directors and senior executives.

Companies should provide the information indicated in 
the guide to reporting on Principle 8.

Yes

Yes

Yes

Page 69

ASX CGC 8.1

Refer to 
Remuneration 
Report

ASX CGC 8.2

ASX CGC 8.3

Pro Medicus Limited’s corporate governance practices were in place  throughout the year ended 30 June 2013.

66     Annual Report 2013

67    

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT cont.

Structure of the Board
The skills, experience and expertise 
relevant to the position of director 
held by each director in office at the 
date of the annual report is included 
in the Directors’ Report. 

The composition of the Board was 
determined in accordance with the 
following principles and guidelines:

 ▶ The Board should comprise at least 
four directors and should maintain a 
majority of non–executive directors, 
or at least a 50/50 ratio of non–
executives and executive directors;

 ▶ The Chairperson must be a non–

executive director and not occupy 
the role of CEO;

 ▶ The Board should comprise 

directors with an appropriate range 
of qualifications and expertise; and

 ▶ The Board shall meet monthly 
and follow meeting guidelines 
set down to ensure all directors 
are made aware of, and have 
available all necessary information, 
to participate in an informed 
discussion of all agenda items.

Directors of Pro Medicus Limited are 
considered to be independent when 
they are independent of management 
and free from any business or other 
relationship that could materially 
interfere with – or could reasonably 
be perceived to materially interfere 
with the exercise of their unfettered 
and independent judgement.

In the context of director 
independence, “materiality” 
is considered from both the 
company and individual director 
perspective. The determination of 
materiality requires consideration 
of both quantitative and qualitative 
elements. An item is presumed to be 
quantitatively immaterial if it is equal 
or less than 5% of the appropriate 
base amount. It is presumed to be 
material (unless there is qualitative 
evidence to the contrary) if it is 
equal to or greater than 10% of the 
appropriate base amount. 

Qualitative factors considered 
include whether a relationship 
is strategically important, the 
competitive landscape, the nature of 
the relationship and the contractual 
or other arrangements governing 
it and other factors which point to 
the actual ability of the director in 
question to shape the direction of the 
company’s loyalty.

In accordance with the definition of independence above, and the materiality 
thresholds set, the following directors of Pro Medicus Limited are considered 
to be independent:

NAME

POSITION

P T Kempen

Chairman, Non–Executive Director,  
Chairman Audit Committee

R Lyle

Non–Executive Director

The Board wishes to advise that it continues to maintain responsibility for 
the actions of the chief executive officer and any tasks delegated to the 
management by the Board.

Directors’ Appointment Letters have not been revised in the prescribed 
format as the board considered this unnecessary given the small number 
of fairly recently appointed current directors who understand their roles and 
responsibilities. The board has undertaken that the recommended format 
should be used for any future director appointments.

Mr. Sam Hupert and Mr. Anthony Hall were directors in Pro Medicus Pty Ltd 
since incorporation in 1983. Mr. Peter Kempen was appointed in March 2008 
and Mr Roderick Lyle was appointed in November 2010.

Performance
The performance of the board and key executives is reviewed regularly 
against both measurable and qualitative indicators. During the reporting 
period the board conducted performance evaluations that involved  
an assessment of each board member’s and key executive’s  
performance against specific and measurable qualitative and  
quantitative performance criteria.

The performance criteria against which directors and executives are  
assessed are aligned with the financial and non–financial objectives of  
Pro Medicus Limited.

In order to ensure that the Board continues to discharge its responsibilities 
in an appropriate manner, the Chairman annually reviews the performance of 
all Directors who will be asked to retire from the board if not performing in a 
satisfactory manner.

Trading policy
Under the group’s security trading policy, an executive, director, or any 
employee of the group, must not trade in any securities of the parent 
company at any time when they are in possession of unpublished, price–
sensitive information in relation to those securities.

Before commencing to trade, an executive must first obtain the approval  
of the Company Secretary to do so and a director must obtain approval of  
the Chairman.

Only in exceptional circumstances will approval be forthcoming inside of the 
period which is 30 days after:

 ▶ One day following the announcement of the half–yearly and full year results as 

the case may be.

 ▶ One day following the holding of the annual general meeting.

 ▶ One day after any other form of earnings forecast update is given to the market.

As required by the ASX listing rules, the Group notifies the ASX of any 
transaction conducted by directors in the securities of the parent company.

Code of Conduct 
The board has developed a “Code of Conduct” consistent with the 
recommendations and details are disclosed on the company website.

Diversity 
The Group recognises the value contributed to the organisation by 
employing people with varying skills, cultural backgrounds, ethnicity and 
experience. Pro Medicus believes its diverse workforce is the key to its 
continued growth, improved productivity and performance.

We actively value and embrace the diversity of our employees and are 
committed to creating an inclusive workplace where everyone is treated 
equally and fairly, and where discrimination, harassment and inequity are not 
tolerated. While Pro Medicus is committed to fostering diversity at all levels, 
gender diversity has been and continues to be a priority for the Group.

To this end, the Group supports and complies with the recommendations 
contained in the ASX Corporate Governance Principles and 
Recommendations. The Group has established a diversity policy outlining 
the board’s measurable objectives for achieving diversity. This is assessed 
annually to measure the progress towards achieving those objectives.

The table below outlines the diversity objectives established by the board, the 
steps taken during the year to achieve these objectives and the outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

STEPS TAKEN/OUTCOME

Increase the number of 
women in the workforce, 
including senior 
management positions 
and at board level.

 ▶ There were no key senior female appointments 
made during the year as there were no key 
senior appointments made during the year.

 ▶ Pro Medicus appointed 2 females in managerial 

roles

 ▶ As at 30 June 2013, women represented 20% in 
the Group’s workforce (2012:20%), 20% in key 
executive positions (2012:20%) and 0%  
at board level (2012:0%)

 ▶ Women represented 20% of new hires during 

the year (2012:23%) 
For the upcoming financial year, the Group 
targets to increase female representation in  
the Group’s workforce to 25-30%

 ▶ Pro Medicus has set a zero tolerance policy 
against discrimination of employees at all 
levels. The company also provides avenues for 
employees to voice their concerns or report any 
discrimination.

 ▶ No cases of discrimination were reported 

during the year (2012: nil).

Promote an inclusive 
culture that treats the 
workforce with fairness 
and respect.

Provide career 
development 
opportunities for every 
employee, irrespective 
of any cultural, gender or 
other differences.

 ▶ Whilst Pro Medicus place focus on gender 

diversity, career development opportunities are 
equal for all employees.

 ▶ During the year, representation at training 

and development programs was based on 
performance of the employees.

The achievement of the measurable objectives in the current financial year 
was taken into consideration in assessing bonuses for employees. The Group 
will continue to review and update the measurable objectives to promote 
diversity for the upcoming year. 

Committees
Due to the small number of Directors, the Board decided it was more 
appropriate to handle nomination and remuneration issues at full Board level. 
No Committees for these functions have been established at this time. 

In addition the full Board handles any matters as and when they arise concerning 
environmental issues, occupational health and safety, finance and treasury. 

In order to maintain good corporate governance the Non–Executive 
Directors assume responsibility for determining and reviewing compensation 
arrangements for the Executive Directors of the Group. The Executive Directors 
in turn are responsible for determining and reviewing the compensation 
arrangements for the Non–Executive Directors. The CEO, in conjunction with 
the full Board reviews the terms of employment for all executives.

The Board has delegated the 
responsibility of executive 
remuneration to the management 
who will assess the appropriateness 
of the nature and amount of 
remuneration of such executives 
on a periodic basis by reference 
to relevant employment market 
conditions with the overall objective 
of ensuring maximum stakeholder 
benefit from the retention of a high 
quality board and executive team. 

The appointment of appropriately 
skilled Non–Executive Directors, 
together with a broadly unchanged 
business base has meant no new 
director nominations have been 
required to date. 

Strategic planning has been an 
important objective of the Board. 
Meetings are scheduled so that all 
Board members can attend and are 
conducted in an informal fashion 
to allow non–executive directors to 
gain enhanced industry, customer, 
product and research knowledge.

Audit Committee
The board has established an audit 
committee, which operates under a 
charter approved by the Board. 

It is the Board’s responsibility to 
ensure that an effective internal 
control framework exists within  
the entity. This includes internal 
controls to deal with both the 
effectiveness and efficiency of 
significant business processes.  
This also includes the safeguarding 
of assets, the maintenance of proper 
accounting records, and reliability 
of financial information as well as 
non–financial considerations such as 
the benchmarking of operational key 
performance indicators. 

The members of the audit 
committee are:

P T Kempen Chairman

S A Hupert

A B Hall

R Lyle

The audit committee is also 
responsible for nomination of the 
external auditor and reviewing the 
adequacy of the scope and quality 
of the annual statutory audit and half 
yearly audit review.

Due to the small number of Directors, 
all members of the Board serve on 
the Audit Committee, whilst the Board 
Chairman is also the Audit Committee 
Chairman as his area of expertise is in 
Accounting and Finance.

68     Annual Report 2013

69    

In accordance with ASX Principle 
7, the Board has received from the 
Management an assurance that internal 
risk management and internal control 
systems are effective. The Board has 
also received a declaration from the 
Chief Executive Officer and Chief 
Financial Officer in accordance with 
section 295A of the Corporations Act 
founded on the sound system of risk 
management an internal compliance 
and control which is operating 
effectively in respect to financial 
reporting risks. 

The Company up until late in the financial 
period was not exposed to any interest 
rate or significant currency sensitive loans 
or debts. Given the increase in overseas 
operations there is now an increased 
currency risk as a consequence of 
contracts written in and cash being held 
in foreign currencies. This change in risk 
profile has been noted by the board and 
action is being taken to manage this 
risk. The Board oversees appropriate 
backup procedures for important 
company data. Detailed annual review 
of insurance policies in force to ensure 
cover is at appropriate levels to safeguard 
key executives, Company assets and 
operations. The Board regularly considers 
succession planning to ensure staff of 
appropriate skill and experience are 
available to the Company. 

CORPORATE 
INFORMATION

ABN 25 006 194 752

Directors
The names of the Directors of the 
Company in office during the year 
and until the date of this report are: 

Peter Terence Kempen 
Chairman/Non–Executive Director/
Chairman Audit Committee 

Solicitors
Sci–Law Strategies 

Bankers
Westpac Banking Corporation

Auditors
Ernst & Young

Dr Sam Aaron Hupert  
Chief Executive Officer/ 
Managing Director 

Anthony Barry Hall 
Technology Director

Roderick Lyle 
Non–Executive Director

Company Secretary
Clayton James Hatch 

Registered Office 
450 Swan Street  
Richmond, VIC, 3121 
(03) 9429 8800

www.promedicus.com.au 
www.promedicus.com 
www.visageimaging.com

Share Registry 
Link Market Services Limited 
Level 12, 680 George Street 
Sydney NSW 2000,Australia

Mailing address: 
Link Market Services Limited 
Locked Bag A14 
Sydney South NSW 1235, Australia

Telephone +612 8280 7111 
Toll free  1300 554 474 
Facsimile +612 9287 0303 
Facsimile (proxy forms only)  
+612 9287 0309

registrars@linkmarketservices.com.au

www.linkmarketservices.com.au

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT cont.

Board Functions
As the Board acts on behalf of and 
is accountable to the shareholders, 
it seeks to identify the expectations 
of the shareholders, as well as other 
regulatory and ethical expectations 
and obligations. In addition, the 
Board is responsible for identifying 
areas of significant business risk and 
ensuring arrangements are in place 
to adequately manage those risks. 
The Board seeks to discharge these 
responsibilities in a number of ways.

The Board has delegated 
responsibility for the operation 
and administration of the group 
to the Chief Executive Officer and 
the executive team (as detailed in 
Note 23). The Board ensures that 
this team is appropriately qualified 
and experienced to discharge 
their responsibilities and has in 
place procedures to assess the 
performance of the Chief Executive 
and the executive team.

The Board is responsible for ensuring 
that management’s objectives 
and activities are aligned with the 
expectations and risks identified by 
the Board. The Board has a number 
of mechanisms in place to ensure 
this is achieved. In addition to the 
establishment of the committee 
referred to above, these mechanisms 
include the following:

 ▶ approval of strategic plans, which 
encompass the entity’s vision, 
mission and strategy statements, 
designed to meet stakeholders’ 
needs and manage business risk;

 ▶ involvement in developing 

the strategic plan (a dynamic 
document) and approving initiatives 
and strategies designed to ensure 
the continued growth and success 
of the entity;

 ▶ overseeing implementation of 

operating plans and budgets by 
management and monitoring of 
progress against budget – this 
includes the establishment and 
monitoring of key performance 
indicators (both financial and non–
financial) for all significant business 
processes; and

 ▶ utilising appropriately skilled 

professionals to provide advice 
on relevant discussion topics and 
procedures to allow Directors, in the 
furtherance of their duties, to seek 
independent professional advice at 
the Company’s expense.

Monitoring of the Board’s Performance and 
Communication to Shareholders — Continuous 
Disclosure Policy

The board has developed a written policy to ensure compliance with the ASX 
Listing Rules on continuous disclosure and has adopted measures to ensure 
the market and shareholders are fully informed. The measures in place require 
all potential market sensitive matters are discussed with the Chief Executive 
Officer who in conjunction with the Chairman and other relevant directors 
decide whether to make an appropriate announcement to the market. 

Only nominated authorised persons have the authority to release these 
communications to the ASX. This policy is displayed on the company website.

Shareholder Communication 

The Board of Directors aims to ensure that the shareholders, on behalf of whom 
they act, are informed of all information necessary to assess the performance of 
the Directors. Information is communicated to the shareholders through:

 ▶ the annual report which is distributed to all shareholders registered to receive 

copies;

 ▶  through the release of information to the market via the ASX

 ▶ the annual general meeting and other meetings so called to obtain 

approval for Board action as appropriate;

 ▶ an up to date website:  

www.promedicus.com.au;

 ▶ email contact with registered users; and

 ▶ special written communications to shareholders distributed with the  

dividend notifications.

The company is adopting procedures to ensure that any material  
given to a particular group is available to all interested parties via the 
company website. This includes any material presented at the Annual 
General Meeting.

A representative of the external auditors Ernst & Young will continue to 
attend the Annual General Meeting.

Risk Management Policies 

The Company takes a proactive approach to risk management. The Board is 
responsible for ensuring that risks are identified on a timely basis and that the 
Group’s objectives and activities are aligned with the risks identified by the Board.

The Company believes that it is crucial for all Board members to participate in 
this process; as such the Board has not established separate committees for 
areas such as risk management, environmental issues, occupational health 
and safety or treasury.

The Company is committed to the identification; monitoring and management of 
risks associated with its business activities and has included in its management 
and reporting systems a number of risk management controls, such as:

 ▶ Annual budgeting and monthly reporting systems for all operations which 
enable the monitoring of progress against performance targets and to 
evaluate trends

 ▶ Guidelines and limits on capital expenditure and purchasing authority matrix

 ▶ Executive approvals for staffing requirements

 ▶ Detailed monthly management reports including cash flow reports, and to 
identify any foreign currency risks associated with contracts written in and 
cash being held in foreign currencies

70     Annual Report 2013

71    

 
 
 
 
Did you know that you can 
access — and even update 
— information about your 
holdings in Pro Medicus 
Limited via the Internet. 

Visit Link Market Services’ website  
linkmarketservices.com.au and access a 
wide variety of holding information, make 
some changes online or download forms. 

You can
 X Check your current and previous 

holding balances 

 X Choose your preferred annual report 

1  Highlights 2012/2013

delivery option 

3  CEO and Chairman’s Letter 

 X Update your address details 

5  Financial Summary

 X Update your bank details 

7  Business Background

 X Lodge, or confirm lodgement of, your 
Tax File Number (TFN), Australian 
Business Number (ABN) or exemption 
  The Year in Review 

9  Global Leadership Team

 X Check transaction and dividend history 

11

 X Enter your email address 

13

  Into the Future

 X Check the share prices and graphs 

  Financial Statements

15

 X Download a variety of instruction forms 

  Director’s Report

16

 X Subscribe to email announcements 

60  Director’s Declaration

62  Independent Audit Report

You can access this information via a 
security login using your Security holder 
Reference Number (SRN) or Holder 
Identification Number (HIN) as well as your 
surname (or company name) and postcode 
(must be the postcode recorded on your 
holding record). 

65  Corporate Governance

64  ASX Additional Information

71  Corporate Information

Don’t miss out  
on your dividends 
Dividend cheques that are not banked are 
required to be handed over to the State 
Trustee under the Unclaimed Monies 
Act. You are reminded to bank cheques 
immediately. 
S
Better still, why not have us 
T
do your banking for you 
N
Wouldn’t you prefer to have immediate 
access to your dividend payment? Your 
E
dividend payments can be credited directly 
T
into any nominated bank, building society 
N
or credit union account in Australia as 
cleared funds on dividend payment date 
O
— and we will still mail [(or email if you 
prefer)] you a dividend advice confirming 
C
your payment details. Not only can we do 
your banking for you, but payment by direct 
credit eliminates the risk of cheque fraud. 

Designed & produced by Kajetan Design Group Pty.Ltd. Melbourne

ProMed AR13 Final.indd   72

ProMed 2013 Annual Report Cover Artwork.indd   2

10/10/13   4:06 PM

4/10/13   10:47 AM

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
T

R

O

P

E

R

L

A

U

N

N

A

P

R

O

M

E

D

I

C

U

S

L

I

M

I

T

E

D

A

N

N

U

A

L

R

E

P

O

R

T

2

0

1

3

450 Swan Street  
Richmond, VIC, 3121 
(03) 9429 8800

www.promedicus.com.au 
www.promedicus.com 
www.visageimaging.com

ProMed 2013 Annual Report Cover Artwork.indd   1

4/10/13   10:47 AM