Quarterlytics / Healthcare / Biotechnology / ProQR Therapeutics N.V.

ProQR Therapeutics N.V.

prqr · NASDAQ Healthcare
Claim this profile
Ticker prqr
Exchange NASDAQ
Sector Healthcare
Industry Biotechnology
Employees 51-200
← All annual reports
FY2015 Annual Report · ProQR Therapeutics N.V.
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
ANNUAL
REPORT 
2015

It’s in our RNA

Including magazine

ProQR Therapeutics N.V. 

T:  +31 88 166 7000 

W: www.proqr.com 

E:  info@proqr.com

Office Leiden:

Darwinweg 24, 2333 CR Leiden, 

The Netherlands

Office Palo Alto:

543 Bryant Street, Palo Alto, 

CA 94301, US

PAGE I
 Magazine
ANNUAL REPORT 2015

ProQR

Game-changing innovator  
in the interest of patients

For decades there was little hope for people with a rare genetic disease. 

Due to the innovative efforts of several companies, people with rare genetic 

diseases like cystic fibrosis (CF) may cherish hope. Since the discovery of RNA 

modification, a future beckons in which DNA errors can be corrected at the 

RNA level, overcoming some of the challenges that are associated with, for 

example, gene therapies. Undoubtedly, further development of this technolo-

gy offers hope of a better life for millions of patients. This is the world where 

ProQR Therapeutics is focusing.

Initially, ProQR was founded to beat 

a cure. ProQR originated from the 

cystic fibrosis in just one child. Now, 

drive of Dutchman Daniel de Boer, 

ProQR’s quest leads far beyond, as 

who was looking for a treatment 

its mission is to develop treatments 

for his son. He eventually founded 

for all patients with rare genetic 

ProQR together with preeminent 

diseases.

leaders in the biotech space: Dinko 

Valerio, Henri Termeer and Gerard 

quartered in the bioscience park in 

Leiden, the Netherlands. Surround-

ed by several other innovative 

organizations, ProQR’s scientific 

staff pioneer in the development of 

medicines in its relentless efforts to 

find medicines to fight rare genetic 

diseases. 

Since its inception in 2012, ProQR 

quickly advanced an RNA repair 

technology for CF that was discov-

ered by a world-renowned RNA sci-

entist from Massachusetts General 

Hospital and called their molecule 

QR-010. A second program called 

QR-110 was launched to fight the 

most common cause of genetic 

blindness in children, a disease 

called Leber’s congenital amaurosis. 

This program is based on a tech-

nology discovered by a university in 

the Netherlands. With pre-clinical 

data for the programs in hand, the 

company completed a successful 

IPO on the Nasdaq Stock Market in 

2014.

ProQR’s focus
ProQR has shown remarkable exe-

cution power. It has taken the initial 

idea of the QR-010 program for 

CF targeted at the ∆F508 mutation 

into two global clinical studies in 

a total of 80 CF patients to date. It 

advanced the second program, QR-

110, which targets Leber’s congeni-

tal amaurosis due to the p.Cys998X 

mutation and is moving this second 

program towards the clinic in 2016. 

With the start of it’s innovation unit, 

the company has been actively 

PAGE II
Ma ga zine
ANNUAL REP ORT 2015

Growth numbers

105

8

100

140M

10M

5
ProQRians

1
Programs

1
Targets under evaluation

520K
Capital raised in €

49K
Patient potential

2012

2013

2014

2015

RNA and our genes, in short

The company, with offices and labs 

Platenburg. 

expanding the pipeline to utilize its 

Genetic diseases are caused by a defect in our genes, our DNA. 

in Leiden (the Netherlands) and 

Palo Alto (CA, US), is a result of what 

is globally known as ‘patient-driven 

drug development’. It is a great 

RNA modification – the name of 
the game
Only four years after the company’s 

example of people impacted by a 

formation, ProQR is part of the 

disease starting their own quest for 

thriving global biotech sector, head-

RNA technologies to target severe 

These broken genes cause downstream effects on the proteins 

genetic disorders. ProQR now has 

which cause the diseases. To create proteins our cells make a 

promising programs in five thera-

copy of our genes, called the RNA, which functions as the blue-

peutic areas.  

print for proteins. ProQR’s technologies aim to repair the defects 

in the RNA to restore protein function and take away the underly-

ing cause of a disease. 

PAGE III
Magazine
ANNUAL REPORT 2015

PAGE IV
Ma ga zine
ANNUAL REP ORT 2015

RNA MODULATION 
an elegant approach

The ProQR way
Historically, there have not been many treatment 

tempting to fix the underlying defect at the genetic level 

small and do not need a vector or vehicle to be deliv-

•  Dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa, a severe disorder 

through DNA modification, which permanently changes 

ered to the target organ. The molecules are specifically 

that causes fragile skin

options for severe genetic diseases. Over the past few 

the genetic makeup of patients and is hard to deliver to 

designed for the disease and its particular defect and 

•  Usher syndrome, the most common cause of com-

decades, many new approaches have been developed 

the right cells and organs. ProQR aims to repair genetic 

therefore can have potential wide applicability. ProQR 

bined deaf and blindness

but there is still a clear unmet need for many patients. 

defects through RNA modification, which potentially 

has developed a toolbox of RNA technologies to make 

•  Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD), a com-

These new approaches include looking at an alternative 

removes the underlying cause of genetic diseases, but 

molecules with which the company can potentially treat 

mon disease causing vision loss

way to add the functionality lost by the genetic defect 

does not permanently alter cells. Furthermore, the 

many genetic disorders.

•  Friedreich’s ataxia, results in progressive damage to 

by adding the missing proteins, but the applicability is 

repair only takes place in cells that express the gene 

limited to some diseases only. Another approach is at-

that is causing the disease and the RNA molecules are 

How does the QR-010 molecule work? 
Unlike any other CF treatment currently in develop-

the nervous system

•  Huntington’s disease, affecting muscle coordination 

and cognition

ment, QR-010 aims to repair the ∆F508 mutation in the 

•  Beta-amyloid related disorders including Alzheimer’s 

RNA. After the RNA is repaired, a normal healthy CFTR 

disease, the most common form of dementia. 

Research and development pipeline

QRX-704
Huntington’s disease

QRX-313
Epidermolysis bullosa 

QRX-504
Fuchs (FECD)

QRX-411
Usher syndrome

QRX-604
Friedreich's ataxia

QRX-203
Alzheimer’s disease

QR-110
LCA
>2,000 patients

QR-010
cystic fibrosis
>49,000 patients

Innovation

Pre-clin 
development

Phase 1 & 
clinical PoC

Pivotal 
studies

protein can be formed that is expected to have normal 

function. The goal of ProQR’s QR-010 is to stop the 

progression of cystic fibrosis. 

How does the QR-110 molecule work? 
As with all of ProQR’s molecules, QR-110 aims to repair 

the mutation at the RNA level, in this case restoring 

CEP290 function. To target the p.Cys99X mutation in 

the CEP290 gene ProQR needed a different approach 

than the one used for QR-010 for CF. Therefore, a sec-

ond technology was licensed and QR-110 was designed.

Other molecules in development 
ProQR has a pipeline with molecules targeting more 

diseases than just CF and LCA. Other diseases that the 

company is working on include: 

The molecules are 
specifically designed 
for the disease and 
its particular defect 
and therefore can 
have potential wide 
applicability

Indy Klaver (14)

PAGE VI
Cys tic fibros is at a  glanc e
ANNUAL REP ORT 2015

Dreaming of  

a care-free life

A group of teenage girls on bikes enters a street in Oostzaan, a pretty rural 

town just north of Amsterdam. They chatter and laugh on the way home after 

a long day at school in nearby Zaanstad. For a neutral observer it would be 

difficult to distinguish the girl in the group who suffers from cystic fibrosis 

(CF), a rare genetic disease with a high mortality rate.

Cystic fibrosis at a glance

Cystic fibrosis is a life-threatening, genetic disease 
that causes persistent lung infections and progres-
sively limits the ability to breathe. In people with CF, 
a defect in the CFTR gene causes the production of 
faulty CFTR protein causing a thick, build-up of mu-
cus in the lungs, pancreas and other organs. In the 
lungs, the mucus clogs the airways and traps bacte-

ria leading to infections, extensive lung damage and 
eventually, respiratory failure. In the pancreas, the 
mucus prevents the release of digestive enzymes 
that allow the body to break down food and absorb 
vital nutrients. The most common CF mutation is 
the ∆F508 mutation that affects about 70% of the 
70,000 CF patients worldwide.

with severe coughing and lung in-

knows the whole routine is nec-

not there all the time. A life without 

fection. “Once or twice a year, when 

essary to lead a fairly normal life. 

the medication, without the rules 

a bacteria of some sort makes me 

“But it is just too much sometimes. I 

that are all ‘for your own good’. I 

sick, breathing becomes difficult. 

hate it, get angry, take it out on my 

hear that too often. I don’t want to 

It’s as if I am breathing through 

mom.” 

a straw. I sometimes experience 

be the problem child. I wish there 

was some sort of pill that would 

breathing difficulties, for example 

‘Fairly normal’ means that Lin-

get rid of CF for good.” In short, a 

when I try to run up the stairs at 

da and Indy can go on day trips, 

healthy, hassle-free life.

school. I have to stop and catch my 

shopping in Amsterdam or even to 

breath. Having an infection means 

an amusement park. Linda: “But 

Looking outside from the living 

I have to go to hospital. I need 

we will need to bring the bag with 

room, with dinner almost ready, 

Meet Indy Klaver, who just got 

hooked up to an oxygen tank.

a week or two with intravenous 

medication, nebulizer and other 

Indy spots a ray of sunshine over 

home. A 14 year-old 1.75 meters tall 

Havo/VWO high school student who 

is one of the 70,000 people around 

Today was good
Fortunately, it is not like that for 

the world that suffer from CF. CF is 

now with Indy. She says “Today was 

a rare and progressive genetic dis-

good. I even participated in sports 

ease, that mostly affects the lungs 

classes at school. I’m okay most of 

medication such as antibiotics and 

necessities. There is no spontaneity 

the flat, water-rich countryside of 

prednisolone to recover.”

in Indy’s life. Every step needs to be 

Oostzaan. “It’s almost spring and 

planned carefully.”

then comes summer. I like dry, 

A matter of discipline
“Staying out of hospital is a mat-

ter of discipline”, Indy’s mother 

Dreams for the future
Being a 14-year old, Indy does 

sunny summers. They are easy on 

my lungs and I love going out to the 

nearby Twiske nature area with my 

but also stretches to the pancreas, 

the times, provided I take care of 

Linda adds. Indy: “I get up early in 

have her dreams for the future. “I 

friends for a swim. Come to think of 

liver, kidneys, and intestine and is 

myself. When I take my medication, 

the morning, to take my oral and 

want to be a lawyer, to help other 

it… mum, do you think we can go to 

potentially fatal at a median age 

when I eat well and get enough 

nebulized medication. I go over this 

people. Or a DJ, doing shows every 

France this summer?” Linda leaves 

of 27 years in the United States. 

sleep, I have a good chance of stay-

routine again in the evening. I take 

night, sleeping late in the morning. 

the question unanswered for now. 

Indy may face a future of lung and 

ing out of trouble. And of staying 

healthy chocolate energy drinks to 

And having sushi for breakfast. 

She serves meatballs for dinner. 

digestion problems, of having to 

out of the hospital.” 

school. When I eat, I need to take 

Preferably, without the pills.” Some 

“Eat well”, she adds. “We need to 

take extensive medication, under-

enzyme tablets to prevent stomach 

moments later, after having given 

keep your body weight to at least 

going lengthy breathing treatments, 

The trouble Indy is referring to is 

aches. At night I take food supple-

her dreams some more thought: 

55 kilos. Don’t forget your pills, by 

and possibly progressing into being 

the occasional setback that starts 

ments via a feeding tube.” Indy 

“Or at least a life in which the CF is 

the way.” 

PAGE VI I
Magazi ne
ANNUAL REPORT 2015

BUILDING ON  
THE POTENTIAL OF 
RNA MODULATION

Promising programs in five therapeutic areas

The world is waiting for a breakthrough, game-changing innovation. ProQR’s target 

is to develop life-changing treatments with ProQR’s unique RNA modulation tech-

nologies, which could be the key to repair the underlying defects in genetic disease.

ProQR’s scientists are proud of the results for the 

one other CF disease causing mutation) with the option 

QR-010 molecule in the lab. The outcomes have been 

to enroll an additional 16. The NPD assay selectively 

promising and we believe no other experimental 

measures the activity of the impaired CFTR protein in 

medicine ever showed similar effects on CFTR function, 

the nasal epithelium in CF patients, which is similar to 

the protein that is defective in CF. ProQR has shown it 

the lung epithelium. Both studies are expected to re-

can move fast, by initiating two global clinical studies in 

port top-line data in mid to late 2016. Clinical develop-

under three years after its inception.

ment for its Leber’s congenital amaurosis program will 

be prepared in 2016, supported by a strong pre-clinical 

The first is a Phase 1b study evaluating the safety and 

proof of concept.

tolerability of inhaled QR-010 in 64 CF patients that 

are homozygous (carrying two copies) for the ∆F508 

Beyond these, there is a world of possible ideas and 

mutation. This study also measures some exploratory 

leads to be explored. The innovation unit – the com-

efficacy endpoints including a measure of lung func-

pany’s in-house discovery engine – currently has over 

tion. The second study is a proof-of-concept study eval-

100 disease targets under evaluation and has brought 

uating the effect of QR-010 on an important measure 

forward promising programs in five therapeutic areas. 

of CFTR function, nasal potential difference (NPD). The 

The company is organized in teams dedicated to one 

study plans to enroll 16 CF patients, eight homozygous 

program to ensure the utmost focus while the company 

(carrying two copies) for the ∆F508 mutation and eight 

is expanding. Based on its proprietary RNA technolo-

compound heterozygous (one copy of the ∆F508 plus 

gies, we believe ProQR is building a pipeline of hope. 

PAGE VII I
Ma ga zine
ANNUAL REP ORT 2015

125

ProQRians

Gender of employees

Average age

Number of nationalities

PAGE IX
Magazine
ANNUAL REPORT 2015

Dinko Valerio, 
biotech veteran and 
Chairman of the ProQR 
Supervisory Board

PAGE X
Ma ga zine
ANNUAL REP ORT 2015

 I witnessed critical 
scientists from 
outside change their 
minds instantly: 
we discovered 
something really 
valuable

“We leave no  

stone unturned”

Dinko Valerio, ProQR’s Chairman of the Supervisory Board, is a scientist and an 

entrepreneur. The gene therapy professor, founder and builder of Crucell, is 

fully aware of the great scientific potential of ProQR. Four years after having met 

Daniel de Boer, Valerio insists: “The crown jewel of ProQR is its success in tar-

geting diseases at the RNA level. It offers the potential for treating hundreds of 

genetic diseases. We feel a responsibility to live up to the great expectations.”

organization in order. We have the 

had my doubts. Then the data from 

turned. And third: impatience! This 

toolbox of RNA technologies. We 

in vivo experiments came in. They 

combination does beg the necessity 

have a whole series of programs 

were spectacular. I witnessed criti-

for high scrutiny on the other side. 

with potential and are on the brink 

cal scientists from outside change 

At ProQR we have surrounded 

of receiving our first human data. 

their minds instantly: we discovered 

ourselves with highly critical people, 

The principle remains the same – 

something really valuable. What 

who are the ‘top of the bill’ in their 

we try to repair genetic errors at 

followed – the programs, the leads, 

field to ensure the highest stan-

the RNA level in order to restore 

the studies - was the result of an-

dards.”

protein function in specific diseas-

other three years of execution and 

es.”

investing a lot of human energy. 

“Meanwhile, we try to monitor our 

But now we have something in 

entrepreneurial spirit. The greatest 

When did Valerio first realise that 

hand that may be able to target the 

danger is complacency. In the first 

ProQR potentially holds a ‘golden 

biological errors in cystic fibrosis, 

four years we have been hugely 

nugget’? “The first defining moment 

Leber’s congenital amaurosis and 

successful. We have built a great 

was during the initial meeting with 

beyond.”

Daniel. I noticed there that we could 

team in a short time, developed 

superb technology and got our 

lift each other to a higher level. 

Valerio: “We want to develop a drug 

finances in order. But we are not 

His impatience and his fearless 

for CF independently. It certainly 

there yet. We must first show that 

approach sparked my enthusiasm 

is an option to cooperate with 

we can help patients. With the read-

that has never left me. Until now, it 

partners for other programs. The 

out of our first clinical studies in CF 

has proved to be a great advantage 

management and the supervisory 

patients in the second half of this 

that a non-scientist, someone from 

board endorse this philosophy. We 

year we are very close to being able 

outside biotech, leads the way. He 

want to keep the drive and sustain 

to do that.”

is new to the fact that biotech is a 

the high energy, attract the best 

It was no coincidence that ProQR 

Our meeting led to the creation of 

long-term task. He has a healthy 

talent and move on.”

“And in the long run? “We have the 

founder and former IT entrepre-

ProQR. We recruited key figures 

neur Daniel de Boer and Dinko 

such as Henri Termeer and Gerard 

Valerio found each other. “After 

Platenburg and a large number of 

finding out that his son was a 

young scientists.” 

patient, he was looking for people 

who would join his quest for a cure 

for cystic fibrosis. I had been work-

Ready for great discoveries
Four years later, ProQR is ready 

kind of impatience and always 

pushes us to go faster.”

No stone unturned
According to Valerio, three human 

organization, the people, the tech-

nology and the external partners. 

This is a powerful combination that 

Spectacular data
The second defining moment came 

qualities are required in addition 

has the ability to make great things 

to the science to produce a drug 

happen.” 

when data from early experiments 

that works. “First, it is the enormous 

with a novel proprietary technology 

drive. Second, a lack of fear to try 

ing on gene therapy in this area. 

for great discoveries. “We have our 

was available. “It looked good, but I 

new things, to leave no stone un-

PAGE XI
Magazi ne
ANNUAL REPORT 2015

PAGE XII
Ma ga zine
ANNUAL REP ORT 2015

 A team’s 
 A team’s 
‘QUEST FOR
‘QUEST FOR
 TREATMENTS’
 TREATMENTS’

Since its formation, ProQR has grown exponentially, from 19 employees in 

2014 to well over 125 today. To all of them, the interest of the patients always 

comes first. Their mission is to make ProQR the innovation powerhouse that 

delivers actual progress in treating rare genetic diseases. 

ProQRians do not 
limit themselves 
to the beaten 
path, they will 
always ask ‘why’

ProQR was founded and built for 

that purpose, around a group of 

A deep desire
To be successful, ProQR scien-

limit themselves to the beaten path, 

atmosphere, in which people love 

belief that this is the way to make 

they will always ask ‘why’, and do 

to work and maintain productive 

things better. A team of rebels at 

biotech veterans with significant 

tists bring a lot more to the table 

whatever it takes to be successful.

and happy lives.

times, always prepared to challenge 

track records, supported by a 

than professionalism, knowledge 

strong staff of devoted and interna-

and a lot of experience in various 

tional scientists. Today, ProQR con-

demanding environments. Suc-

The purpose of ‘fun & joy’
ProQR’s culture promotes open-

It’s in our RNA
It takes a specific DNA, or RNA in 

established approaches and meth-

ods. We believe ProQR’s team is 

truly cutting new paths in the dense 

sists of a group of highly energized 

cess can only be the result of a 

ness, team spirit and personal 

this case, to be a ProQRian. Work-

forest of rare genetic diseases. 

and talented people with different 

deep desire to find new ways, new 

responsibility among its employees. 

ing at ProQR means being part of 

backgrounds from 27 different na-

technologies and new applications. 

We believe that the ‘fun & joy’ of 

a supportive and persistent team. 

tionalities with a common purpose: 

It actually comes from not going 

developing life-changing treatments 

A team that dares to be different, a 

using ground-breaking science to 

‘where the path may lead’, but in-

actually means something. At Pro-

team that is bold, a team that defies 

make a meaningful impact on the 

stead going ‘where there is no path 

QR, employees demand the utmost 

the impossible. A passionate team 

lives of patients. 

and leave a trail.’ ProQRians do not 

of themselves in a positive, fulfilling 

that thinks bigger, because of the 

PAGE XII I
Magazi ne
ANNUAL REPORT 2015

PAGE XIV
Ma ga zine
ANNUAL REP ORT 2015

“The WOW  
moments  
of discovering
new drugs”

We are all committed to making a 

difference in patients’ lives.”

‘Ideas engine’
Janne works in ProQR’s innovation 

unit, the ‘ideas engine’ of the com-

pany, a separate group of scientists 

responsible for the expansion of 

the company’s pipeline beyond 

CF and LCA. “The multicultural 

background offers a multitude of 

approaches and brings up lots of 

ideas on how and where we can ap-

ply current and new RNA technolo-

gies. Finding potential therapies for 

diseases is the name of the game. 

Janne Turunen,  
ProQR Innovation Unit

Janne Turunen is one of ProQR’s scientists who are actually working in the front 

line of drug development. The company’s Innovation Unit is ProQR’s idea cen-

First we develop the technology, 

the attitude that triggers discov-

ProQR introduced the seven Habits 

then we will take a disease model 

eries to happen. This allows ‘wow 

of Happiness, that sort of serve as 

where we think the technology may 

moments’, big and small, to happen 

the core values. These seven habits 

work. The next step is to provide a 

and keeps us motivated.”

shape the ProQR working code that 

proof of concept for the best ones. 

are managed by an actual Happi-

As soon as our department pro-

Janne insists that ProQR operates 

ness Manager, whose aim it is to 

vides this proof, other departments 

with a minimum of hierarchy. “Sure, 

secure and promote positive and 

go to work on the task of making it 

there are units and departments, 

healthy working conditions at the 

work in the real world.”

but a chat with the decision makers, 

company. “Celebrate both success 

scientific and business leads, is only 

and mistakes, is one of the habits. 

“We pitch our ideas – even during 

a few steps away. That is unique 

A drink, a nice dinner, sometimes 

lunch or at the coffee table – to 

and maintaining that company 

just music and some dancing on the 

each other and together we find 

culture is important. It is part of this 

department floor. Don’t be afraid, 

out if an idea has potential.

company’s lifeline and future. This 

approach people when you need 

is the company where a great idea 

help. Be prepared to help. Be open 

In the forefront
Janne believes that ProQR is very 

takes off without ten-page reports 

about your frustrations. At ProQR, 

being written first. Even now at 

we thrive in the exploring mode. It 

much in the forefront of develop-

125 people I feel it still has all the 

is part of the DNA of this company 

ments in the matured RNA domain. 

positive and exciting characteristics 

– perhaps I should say: the RNA, 

tre and pressure cooker at the same time, as Janne Turunen (36) explains. “This 

“Our aim is to bring the huge poten-

of an IT start up.”

is a great place to work, together with a very energetic group of people from 

various backgrounds, countries and experiences that works enormously hard 

towards the same goal.”

tial of RNA technology to the next 

level, to the reality of everyday. To 

be successful, we need people that 

Small but deliberate steps
As in pioneering? “Very much so. 

in that comparison. The quest for 

success is long and we need a lot 

are able to think across scientific ar-

Making small but deliberate steps 

of happiness and wow moments to 

eas and that are open and happy to 

towards creating impact with RNA 

reach the goal.” 

communicate to colleagues outside 

technology. The goal is clear, but 

haha! Some have compared us to 

Google, and there is some truth 

“I noticed this company for the fact 

much later I moved to Leiden and 

their direct field of expertise.” 

the route is not. We need to find 

that it is all about RNA research. 

became part of the ProQR quest 

the route by experimenting. We 

In Finland, where I was born and 

that goes far beyond just CF.” Janne 

ProQR needs explorers with at least 

decide to work with a specific meth-

raised, I did my Ph.D. studies on 

is not only in Leiden because of the 

one trait in common, says Janne: 

od that has not been used before. 

basic RNA biology. I was looking for 

scientific challenge. “It is also the 

“It is all about allowing yourself 

When an experiment is disappoint-

a way to put the science to work, 

passion that got me hooked. All 

to experiment, to venture with a 

ing, we try something else.”

to improve the lives of people. Not 

this work is leading to something. 

sort of ‘infantile’ curiosity. This is 

ANNUAL 
REPORT 
2015

ANNUAL

REPORT 

2015

It’s in our RNA

Including magazine

PAGE 1 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Table of Contents 

Table of Contents 

Message from the CEO 

Key figures 

Management Board 

Supervisory Board 

Management Board Report 

Supervisory Board Report 

Corporate Governance 

Risk Management 

Financial Statements 2015 

  2 

  3 

  4 

  5 

  7 

  13 

  16 

  25 

 27 

 
 
 
 
 
PAGE 2 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Message from the CEO 

Message from the CEO 

2015 was a remarkable year for ProQR. We have started enrolling not one but two clinical studies for our 

cystic fibrosis (CF) molecule QR-010 and brought a second molecule forward for Leber’s congenital amaurosis 

(LCA), QR-110. We grew our company to 125 talented employees all dedicated to improve the lives of patients 

in need. We expanded our headquarters in Leiden, NL and put our stick in the ground in the US with the 

opening of an office in Palo Alto, CA. The growth of our organization and facilities enabled us to make 

significant progress on our RNA based therapeutics pipeline.  

ProQR was founded in 2012 as a company focused on finding a treatment for patients with CF. Our molecule 

for ∆F508 CF, QR-010, is a single stranded, chemically modified antisense RNA oligonucleotide. We 

demonstrated that the naked molecule is well taken up by target cells and together with internationally 

recognized leaders we demonstrated that QR-010 restores normal levels of CFTR function, the protein 

affected by CF. In 2015, our team achieved a major milestone by dosing the first patient with CF with QR-010.  

Our two global trials are actively enrolling and are well supported by the CF medical community and patients. 

This is a truly exciting step in the development of our company and could lead to a transformative therapy for 

patients with CF. 

But our enthusiasm for the potential of RNA based therapeutics does not stop with CF. ProQR recognizes the 

significant potential of RNA based therapeutics for the treatment of eye disease, and as a result, in 2015 we 

strengthened our efforts in ophthalmology. Led by strong and experienced leadership, our ophthalmology 

team is driving several discovery stage programs and advanced QR-110 for LCA into pre-clinical development. 

LCA is the most common form of genetic blindness in children and we are targeting the most prevalent 

mutation. These very exciting programs hold an important promise for patients who will go blind without a 

meaningful treatment. 

Building on the strong progress in our CF and ophthalmology units, we boldly invested in our innovation 

team. The result is extraordinary – by applying our toolbox of RNA technologies we have invented and 

patented numerous molecules for severe genetic diseases like epidermolysis bullosa, Fuchs endothelial 

corneal dystrophy and Usher syndrome. We plan to continue to invest in our growing pipeline in 2016 to 

make a difference in many more lives of patients and their loved ones.   

On a personal note, I want to thank all ProQRians for another year of passion, commitment, energy, 

adventure, fun and hard work. Many thanks to patients, the clinical research teams and the medical and 

scientific communities for joining us in our efforts. And thanks to our shareholders for the continued support 

in our mission. I look forward to another exciting year in which we will readout our first two clinical trials of 

QR-010, move QR-110 towards clinical development and expand and advance our pipeline. 

Daniel de Boer 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Key figures 

PAGE 3 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Key figures 

dsssds  

2015 

2014 

Result from continued operations (in € 1,000) 

Net revenue 

Other income 

Research and development costs 

General and administrative costs 

Operating result 

Net result 

Balance sheet information (in € 1,000) 

Non-current assets 

Current assets 

Total assets 

Shareholders’ equity 

Non-current liabilities 

Current liabilities 

Cash flows (in € 1,000) 

Net cash used in operating activities 

Net cash used in investing activities 

Net cash generated by financing activities 

Ratio’s (in %) 

Current ratio 

Solvency 

Figures per share 

Weighted average number of shares outstanding 

Basic and diluted earnings per share (in €) 

Cash flow per share (in €) 

Employees (in FTE) 

Average number of staff for the period 

-- 

3,235 

(23,401) 

(6,837) 

(27,003) 

(20,832) 

2,340 

97,769 

100,109 

89,799 

4,824 

5,486 

(24,232) 

(1,324) 

1,620 

-- 

313 

(10,267) 

(6,507) 

(16,461) 

(12,127) 

1,350 

113,897 

115,247 

109,404 

2,829 

3,014 

(14,457) 

(1,233) 

119,883 

17.8 

89.7 

37.8 

94.9 

23,343,262 

11,082,801 

(0.89) 

(1.03) 

(1.09) 

9.40 

86.1 

37.8 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PAGE 4 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Management Board 

Management Board 

We have a two-tier board structure consisting of our Management Board (raad van bestuur) and a separate 

Supervisory Board (raad van commissarissen). The Management Board operates under the chairmanship of 

the Chief Executive Officer and shares responsibility for the deployment of ProQR’s strategy and policies, and 

the achievement of its objectives and results.  

Under Dutch Law, the Management Board has ultimate responsibility for the management and external 

reporting of the Company and is answerable to shareholders at the General Meeting of Shareholders. 

Pursuant to the two-tier corporate structure, the Management Board is accountable for its performance to a 

separate and independent Supervisory Board. 

The following table sets out information with respect to each of our Management Board members, their 

respective ages and their positions at the Company as of the date of this annual report. 

Name 

Gender 

Date of Birth 

Position 

Date of  
Appointment 

Term 
expires 

Daniel de Boer 

Male 

April 12, 1983 

Chief Executive Officer 

February 21, 2012 

René Beukema 

Male  March 26, 1964 

Chief Corporate 
Development Officer and 
General Counsel 

April 17, 2014 

2018 

2017 

The following sets forth biographical information regarding our management board members. 

Daniel de Boer is our founding Chief Executive Officer and has served as such since our incorporation in 

February 2012. Mr. de Boer is a passionate and driven entrepreneur and advocate for CF patients, and has 

assembled an experienced team of successful biotech executives as co-founders and early investors. As a 

serial entrepreneur in IT, he founded and led a number of tech companies through phases of growth, 

initiating development and launch of several IT related products in several European countries. Prior to 

founding ProQR, Mr. de Boer served as a founder and Chief Executive Officer of RNA Systems, founder and 

Chief Executive Officer of PC Basic, and founder and Chief Executive Officer of Running IT. Mr. de Boer is 

responsible for the overall strategy and general business in the company. 

René Beukema has served as our Chief Corporate Development Officer and General Counsel since April 2014. 

Mr. Beukema joined us in September 2013 and is a seasoned in-house corporate lawyer in the Dutch 

biotechnology arena. Prior to joining us, Mr. Beukema served as general counsel and corporate secretary of 

Crucell N.V. for twelve years, following his experience as a senior legal counsel at GE Capital / TIP Europe and 

legal counsel at TNT Express Worldwide. Mr. Beukema was also a venture partner of Aescap Venture, a life 

sciences venture capital firm. Mr. Beukema is the co-founder and advisor of Mytomorrows N.V., a Dutch life 

sciences company, and a member of the VU Medical Cancer Center children in Amsterdam. He holds a post-

doctoral degree in corporate law from the University of Nijmegen in co-operation with the Dutch Association 

of In-house Counsel (Nederlands Genootschap van Bedrijfsjuristen) and a Master’s degree in Dutch law from 

the University of Amsterdam. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PAGE 5 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Supervisory Board 

Supervisory Board 

The Supervisory Board supervises the policies of the Management Board and the general course of affairs of 

ProQR and advises the Management Board thereon. The Supervisory Board, in the two-tier corporate 

structure under Dutch law, is a separate and independent corporate body. 

The following table sets forth information with respect to each of our supervisory board members and their 

respective ages as of the date of this annual report. The terms of office of all our supervisory board members 

expire according to a rotation schedule drawn up by our supervisory board. 

Our supervisory board is currently composed of the following members, all of whom are independent under 

applicable NASDAQ standards and all of whom, with the exception of Mr. Antoine Papiernik are independent 

under the Dutch Corporate Governance Code (DCGC): 

Name 

Gender  Nationality 

Date of Birth 

Position  Date of Appointment 

Term expires 

Dinko Valerio 

Male 

NL 

August 3, 1956 

Chairman 

January 1, 2014 

Alison Lawton 

Female 

US  September 26, 1961 

Member 

September 17, 2014 

Antoine Papiernik  

Henri Termeer 

Paul Baart 

Male 

Male 

Male 

FR 

NL 

NL 

July 21, 1966 

Member 

January 1, 2014 

February 28, 1946 

Member 

January 1, 2014 

November 9, 1950 

Member 

June 10, 2015 

2016 

2018 

2018 

2016 

2019 

The following sets forth biographical information regarding our supervisory board members.  

Dinko Valerio is one of our founders and currently serves as the chairman of our supervisory board. Mr. 

Valerio has served on our supervisory board since January 2014. Mr. Valerio is a scientist and an experienced 

biotech entrepreneur with experience in both public and private companies as CEO and board member. Mr. 

Valerio is founder and former CEO of Crucell N.V., a Dutch biotech company, and founder and general 

partner of Aescap Venture, a life sciences venture capital firm. In 1999, Mr. Valerio was one of the founders of 

Galapagos Genomics N.V., a spinout from Crucell N.V. which develops novel mode of action medicines. 

Adding to his corporate experience, Mr. Valerio is a professor in the field of gene therapy of the 

hematopoietic system at the University of Leiden. He received his Master of Science degree in Biology from 

the University of Amsterdam in 1982 and completed his Ph.D. in Molecular Genetics with Honors at the 

University of Leiden in 1986. Mr. Valerio also was a visiting scientific specialist at Genentech Inc., San 

Francisco in 1985 and a postdoctoral fellow at the Salk Institute, San Diego from 1986 to 1987. He is an 

author on more than 100 articles in peer-reviewed journals and an inventor on 11 patent-families. We believe 

that Mr. Valerio's experience in the venture capital industry, particularly with biopharmaceutical companies, 

and his experience serving on the boards of directors of a number of biopharmaceutical companies provide 

him with the qualifications and skills to serve as chairman of our supervisory board. 

Alison Lawton has served on our supervisory board since September 2014. Ms Lawton is currently the Chief 

Operating officer of Aura Biosciences Inc. From January 2013 to January 2014, Ms. Lawton served as Chief 

Operating Officer of OvaScience, Inc., a public life sciences company. From 1991 to 2013, Ms. Lawton worked 

at various positions of increasing responsibility at Genzyme Corporation, or Genzyme, and subsequently at 

Sanofi-Aventis, following its 2011 acquisition of Genzyme, each a global biopharmaceutical company. Ms. 

Lawton served as head of Genzyme Biosurgery, where she was responsible for Genzyme’s global orthopedics, 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PAGE 6 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Supervisory Board 

surgical and cell therapy and regenerative medicine businesses. Prior to that, Ms. Lawton oversaw Global 

Market Access at Genzyme, which included Regulatory Affairs, Global Health Outcomes and Strategic Pricing, 

Global Public Policy, and Global Product Safety & Risk Management. Before joining Genzyme, Ms. Lawton 

worked for seven years in the United Kingdom at Parke-Davis, a pharmaceutical company. Ms. Lawton serves 

on the board of directors of Verastem, Inc., a public biopharmaceutical company. She also served on the 

board of directors of Cubist Pharmaceuticals for three years until its acquisition by Merck &Co., Inc. in 2015. 

She currently consults for X4 Pharmaceuticals. She is past President and Chair of the Board of Regulatory 

Affairs Professional Society and past FDA Advisory Committee member for Cell and Gene Therapy 

Committee. In 2016 she is joining the board of directors of CoLucid Pharmaceuticals. She earned her BSc in 

Pharmacology, with honors, from King’s College London. We believe that Ms. Lawton’s significant operational, 

international, regulatory and senior management experience within the pharmaceutical and biotechnology 

industries, as well as experience serving on a board of directors within the industry, provide her with the 

qualifications and skills to serve as a member of our supervisory board. 

Antoine Papiernik has served on our supervisory board since January 2014. Mr. Papiernik is managing partner 

at Sofinnova Partners, which he joined in 1997. Mr. Papiernik has been an initial investor and active board 

member in public companies like Actelion, Addex, Auris Medical, Orexo, NovusPharma (then sold to CTI), 

Movetis (then sold to Shire), Mainstay, Pixium and Stentys, which went public respectively on the Zurich Stock 

Exchange, the NASDAQ Global Market, the Stockholm Stock Exchange, the Milan Nuovo Mercato, the Belgium 

Stock Exchange, the Dublin Stock Exchange and EuroNext Paris, in Cotherix (initially NASDAQ listed, then sold 

to Actelion), Core Valve (sold to Medtronic), Fovea (sold to Sanofi Aventis) and Ethical Oncology Science (EOS, 

sold to ClovisOncology). Mr. Papiernik has also invested in and is a board member of private companies MD 

Start, ReCor, Shockwave Medical and Reflexion Medical. Mr. Papiernik has an MBA degree from the Wharton 

School of Business, University of Pennsylvania. We believe that Mr. Papiernik's experience in the venture 

capital industry, particularly with biopharmaceutical companies, and his experience serving on the boards of 

directors of a number of biopharmaceutical companies provide him with the qualifications and skills to serve 

as member of our supervisory board. 

Henri Termeer is vice chairman and has served on our supervisory board since January 2014. From October 

1983 to June 2011, Mr. Termeer served as chairman, president and chief executive officer of Genzyme 

Corporation. For ten years prior to joining Genzyme, Mr. Termeer worked for Baxter International 

Laboratories, Inc., a manufacturer of human health care products. Mr. Termeer resigned from Genzyme in 

June 2011 following the acquisition of Genzyme by Sanofi. Widely acknowledged for his contributions to the 

biotechnology industry and health care field, Mr. Termeer is active in the areas of humanitarian assistance, 

policy issues, and innovation in providing access to health care. He is a member of the board of each of 

Massachusetts General Hospital and Partners HealthCare and a member of the board of fellows of Harvard 

Medical School. Mr. Termeer is also a member of the board of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and 

serves on its Executive Committee and a board member of the Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO). He 

is a board member of the New England Healthcare Institute, a nonprofit, applied research health policy 

organization he was instrumental in founding and on the boards of Life Sciences Foundation, Boston Ballet, 

Museum of Science, WGBH and Project Hope. Mr. Termeer is also currently a board member of Abiomed Inc., 

Aveo Pharmaceuticals, Verastem, Inc., Moderna Therapeutics and was a board member of Allergan, Inc. from 

2014 through its acquisition by Actavis in March 2015. Mr. Termeer was chairman of the Federal Reserve 

Bank of Boston’s board of directors from 2010-2011. Mr. Termeer studied economics at the Economische 

Hogeschool (Erasmus University, the Netherlands) and earned an MBA from the Darden School at the 

University of Virginia. We believe that Mr. Termeer’s experience in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology 

industries and his experience serving on the boards of directors of a number of biopharmaceutical 

companies provide him with the qualifications and skills to serve as member of our supervisory board. 

 
 
PAGE 7 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Supervisory Board 

Paul Baart has served on our supervisory board since June 2015. Mr Baart made his career in public 

accounting in both the Netherlands and the USA. At PwC the Netherlands he served on the management 

board and the supervisory board. He was also a member of the global board of PwC International. He has 

served many large (listed) and international clients in various industries. He held professional qualifications 

both in the Netherlands and in the USA. He was chairman of Royal NIVRA, the Dutch Institute of Registered 

Accountants (now NBA), member of the Dutch Council on Annual Reporting (RJ) and supervisory board 

member of Nyenrode Business University. Present roles include outside member Enterprise Chamber 

Amsterdam Court of Appeal (Ondernemingskamer) and chairman Supervisory Board Grant Thornton the 

Netherlands. He studied business economics at the Vrije Universiteit in Amsterdam, where he also passed the 

Registeraccountantsexam. We believe that Mr. Baart’s significant international experience in public 

accounting, as well as his broad experience in management, oversight and boardroom consulting provide 

him with the qualifications and skills to serve as member of our supervisory board and chairman of our audit 

committee. 

 
 
PAGE 8 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Management Board Report 

Management Board Report 

The Company 

ProQR Therapeutics N.V., or “ProQR” or the “Company”, is dedicated to changing lives through the creation of 

transformative RNA medicines for the treatment of severe orphan diseases such as cystic fibrosis and Leber’s 

congenital amaurosis. Based on our unique proprietary RNA repair platform technologies we are growing our 

pipeline with patients and loved ones in mind. 

We were incorporated in the Netherlands, on February 21, 2012 and reorganized from a private company 

with limited liability to a public company with limited liability on September 23, 2014. Legal demerger of our 

Company was effectuated as per June 30, 2015. Our Company has its statutory seat in Leiden, the 

Netherlands. The address of its headquarters and registered office is Darwinweg 24, 2333 CR Leiden, the 

Netherlands.  

Operations 

We are an innovative biopharmaceutical company engaged in the discovery and development of RNA-based 

therapeutics for the treatment of severe genetic orphan disorders. Utilizing our unique proprietary RNA 

repair technologies we are building a pipeline in severe genetic disorders. We believe we can target rare 

genetic disorders in which a single protein is defective due to certain types of genetic mutations. We design 

our therapeutic candidates to specifically target and repair the defective messenger RNA, or mRNA, that is 

transcribed from a mutated gene in order to restore functional or normal (wild-type) protein and therefore, 

we believe, has the potential to modify the disease. We believe that this unique approach offers several 

advantages compared with small molecule, gene therapy and other therapeutic approaches in the treatment 

of certain genetic diseases. Our current clinical stage molecule is QR-010, a single stranded RNA-based 

oligonucleotide that is designed to repair the genetic defect in the most prevalent mutation in cystic fibrosis, 

or CF. We are currently studying this molecule in two global clinical trials in 80 CF patients. Our second 

molecule is QR-110, a single stranded RNA-based oligonucleotide that targets the most prevalent mutation in 

the CEP290 gene for Leber’s congenital amaurosis, or LCA, patients and is currently in preclinical 

development. Beyond that, our in-house discovery engine that we call the innovation unit has been active in 

building a pipeline based upon our toolbox of RNA technologies that we have in-licensed or developed in-

house. We have launched a number of discovery programs including programs in dystrophic epidermolysis 

bullosa, Usher syndrome, Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD), Huntington’s disease, Alzheimer’s 

disease and Friedreich’s ataxia. 

QR-010 and Cystic Fibrosis (CF) 

CF is a genetic disease that affects an estimated 70,000 to 100,000 patients worldwide and causes early 

morbidity and mortality. CF currently has no cure. The median age of death for CF patients in the US is 27 

years, and more than 90% of CF patients die from respiratory failure. To date, all but two of the therapies 

approved to treat CF patients are designed to treat the symptoms of CF rather than address the underlying 

cause. CF is caused by mutations in the gene that encodes for a protein called cystic fibrosis transmembrane 

conductance regulator, or CFTR. Although there are more than 1,900 different genetic mutations that cause 

CF patients. In CF patients, this mutated gene and the resulting defective protein lead to the dysfunction of 

multiple organ systems, including the lungs, pancreas and gastrointestinal tract. In the lung airways, absence 

of functional CFTR protein leads to unusually thick, sticky mucus that clogs the lungs and increases 

vulnerability to chronic, life-threatening lung infections.  

 
 
PAGE 9 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Management Board Report 

Our lead product candidate in the CF space, QR-010, a first-in-class RNA-based oligonucleotide, is designed to 

F508 mutation in 

the CFTR gene of CF patients and subsequently producing wild-type, or normal CFTR protein. QR-010 is 

designed to be self-administered through a small, handheld aerosol delivery device, or nebulizer, in the form 

of a mist inhaled into the lungs. In pre-clinical studies we have shown this method could allow maximum 

exposure of QR-010 to the primary target organ, the lung, as well as significant exposure to other affected 

organs through systemic absorption into the blood. Based on our extensive pre-clinical studies on safety, 

delivery and efficacy in relevant cell and animal models we have started two global clinical studies of QR-010 

in 2015.  

In June 2015, we started enrollment in our first clinical trial directly in CF patients. This Phase 1b clinical trial, 

which we refer to as PQ-010-001, is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 28-day dose-escalation 

study that is conducted in 23 sites in North America and Europe. The primary endpoint of the study is to 

evaluate the safety, tolerability and absorption, distribution and degradation, or pharmacokinetics, of single 

and multiple ascending doses of inhaled QR-010 in 64 CF patients carrying two copies (homozygotes) of the 

∆F508 mutation. As exploratory efficacy endpoints, this study will also assess sweat chloride, weight gain, 

CFQ-R Respiratory Symptom Score and lung function, measured by FEV1. These measures could be indicative 

of the potential efficacy of QR-010 although the study is not powered for statistical significance on these 

endpoints. In parallel with our Phase 1b trial we are conducting a proof-of-concept, or POC, study, which we 

refer to as PQ-010-002, designed to investigate the drug candidate’s ability to restore CFTR function in the 

nasal lining of eight ∆F508 homozygous (carry two allelic copies) and eight compound heterozygous (carry 

one copy of the ∆F508 mutation and one other disease causing mutation). We expect to report top-line data 

from both our Phase 1b trial and our POC study in mid to late 2016.  

QR-010 has been granted orphan drug designation in the United States and the European Union. Generally, if 

a product with an orphan drug designation subsequently receives the first marketing approval for the 

indication for which it has such designation, the product is entitled to a period of market exclusivity. This 

exclusivity precludes the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, or the European Medicines Agency, or 

EMA, as applicable, from approving another marketing application for the same or, in the European Union, a 

similar drug for the same indication for that time period, unless the later product is clinically superior. 

Orphan drug designation does not convey any advantage in, or shorten the duration of, the regulatory review 

and approval process.  

QR-110 and Leber’s Congenital Amaurosis (LCA) 

LCA is the most common genetic cause of blindness in childhood. LCA is caused by a genetic defect in 19 or 

more associated genes. The most common mutation is the p.Cys998X (also known as c.2991+1655A>G) in the 

CEP290 (Centrosomal protein of 290 kDa) gene. Although diagnosis rates vary, based on our estimations we 

believe this mutation occurs in approximately 2,000 patients in the Western world. Most patients affected by 

this mutation lose sight in the first few years of life. There is currently no disease modifying therapy available 

on the market or being tested in clinical development for this specific subtype of the disease. In LCA patients, 

this mutation leads to significant decrease of active CEP290 protein in the photoreceptor cells in the retina in 

the eye. The absence of this essential protein causes blindness. 

Our lead product candidate in the LCA space, QR-110, a first-in-class oligonucleotide, is designed to treat the 

disease by repairing the underlying cause in the mRNA, which results in the production of wild-type CEP290 

protein. The p.Cys998X mutation is a substitution of one nucleotide in the pre-mRNA that leads to a defective 

mRNA and non-functional protein. QR-110 is designed to bind to the mutated location in the pre-mRNA, 

thereby leading to normally spliced or wild-type mRNA, which could produce wild-type or normal protein. QR-

110 is designed to be administered through intravitreal injections in the eye. We believe the activity in pre-

clinical models of LCA provides support for the clinical development and therapeutic potential of QR-110. In 

 
 
PAGE 10 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Management Board Report 

2016 we intend to start our first clinical trial directly in LCA patients. There is recent precedent for an 

accelerated development path in another LCA mutation, and we believe this accelerated development 

pathway can also be applied to QR-110. 

We have filed for orphan drug designation for QR-110 in the U.S. and the European Union.  

Innovation pipeline 

Beyond CF and LCA, our innovation unit, which is our internal discovery engine, is currently evaluating over 

100 disease targets through our internal research or that of external collaborators. These disease targets are 

based on our multiple RNA technologies that were discovered internally or in-licensed. We have a rigorous 

evaluation process in identifying programs for our pipeline that includes establishing genetic causality, ability 

to deliver to the target organ, intellectual property protection, strong proof of concept, and a high unmet 

need. Our early stage programs are in various stages of discovery and target different severe genetic 

disorders where we believe our technologies have the potential to make a life altering impact for affected 

patients. These include programs for epidermolysis bullosa, a severe genetic skin disorder that impacts 

young children, Usher syndrome and Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) programs to further 

strengthen our ophthalmology franchise, programs in our early central nervous system, or CNS, franchise 

that include Huntington’s disease and Alzheimer’s disease as well as a program for Friedreich’s ataxia.  

Human resources 

At ProQR we have set ourselves the immense task of developing drugs that will potentially transform the lives 

of patients suffering from severe genetic diseases like cystic fibrosis and Leber’s congenital amaurosis. To 

make this happen we demand the utmost of ourselves. We actively create a caring atmosphere filled with fun 

and joy, in which we love to work and maintain productive and happy lives. At ProQR we foster 

empowerment, self development, creativity and a sense of community.  

We are a supportive, ingenious and persistent team that does things different. We're passionate and driven 

to change the lives of patients and their loved ones. 

Corporate social responsibility 

It is required by regulatory authorities to demonstrate the quality, safety and efficacy of a new drug in both 

animals and humans, before the authorities can approve the new product and will provide Marketing 

authorization. ProQR attaches great importance to minimalizing the number of animals needed in the 

obligatory animal studies and guarding their welfare. Our aim is to monitor continually that animal 

experiments will be performed only if there are no viable or legal alternatives.  

External collaborators contracted for the execution of our in-vivo pre-clinical studies (contract research 

organizations, CROs) are selected based on their expertise, quality and accreditations for laboratory animal 

care and welfare. The housing and husbandry must comply with the highest international standards. 

Personnel responsible for housing, husbandry and care of the animals must have received adequate and 

relevant documented education. 

We strive for welfare improvements to be implemented in CRO policies. An important achievement in 2014 

was that on our request our preferred CRO has replaced the housing which was compliant with their national 

legislations and installed new group housings with significantly more living space that to a larger extent take 

in consideration the physiological and behavioral needs of the laboratory animals concerned. This will also 

contribute to higher welfare standards in the studies for other (future) clients.  

 
 
 
PAGE 11 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Management Board Report 

Main financial developments 

Financial position 

In 2015, we successfully expanded our operating activities. Operating costs went up significantly while our 

liquidity and solvency went down. ProQR’s cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2015 amounted to  

€ 94,865,000 compared to € 112,736,000 at December 31, 2014. During the year 2015, operating cash used 

amounted to € 24,232,000, compared to € 14,457,000 in 2014. Shareholders’ equity decreased to  

€ 89,799,000. 

As at December 31, 2015, we had non-current liabilities of € 4,824,000, which fully consisted of borrowings 

from a government body. 

Income statement 

We have generated losses since our formation in February 2012. For the years ended December 31, 2013, 

2014 and 2015, we incurred net losses of approximately € 3,253,000, € 12,127,000 and € 20,832,000, 

respectively. As at December 31, 2015, we had an accumulated deficit of € 36,630,000. We expect to continue 

incurring losses for the foreseeable future as we continue our pre-clinical studies of our product candidates, 

continue clinical development of our product candidate QR-010, advance QR-110 into clinical development, 

increase investments in our other research programs, apply for marketing approval of our product 

candidates and, if approved, build a sales and marketing infrastructure for the commercialization of our 

product candidates. To date, we have not generated any revenues from royalties or product sales. Based on 

our current plans, we do not expect to generate royalty or product revenues for the foreseeable future. 

Other income is incidental by nature. In August 2014, we entered into an agreement with Cystic Fibrosis 

Foundation Therapeutics, Inc., or CFFT, a subsidiary of the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, pursuant to which CFFT 

agreed to provide us with up to $ 3 million to support the clinical development of QR-010. In 2015, the QR-010 

project has received funding of € 6 million from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation 

programme under grant agreement No 633545. Consequently, other income increased from € 313,000 in 

2014 to € 3,235,000 in 2015. We expect to continue generating other income from CFFT and Horizon 2020 in 

2016. 

Research and development costs increased to € 23,401,000 from € 10,267,000 in 2014. These research and 

development costs comprise allocated employee costs, costs related to our clinical trials, costs for production 

of clinical and pre-clinical compounds and drug substances by contract manufacturers, fees and other costs 

paid to contract research organizations, or CROs, costs of materials and laboratory consumables, license- and 

IP-costs and other allocated costs. These costs were primarily related to our product candidates, QR-010 and 

QR-110, and our innovation unit. Our research and development expense is highly dependent on the 

development phases of our product candidates and is expected to continue to increase, although it fluctuates 

significantly from period to period.  

The variances in research and development costs between the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 are 

mainly due to:  

 

 

 

costs we incurred on clinical studies for QR-010; 

increased staff costs as a result of increased staff working on (pre-)clinical development of our product 

candidates and the growth of our innovation unit. The number of full-time equivalent employees working 

on research and development increased from 40 at December 31, 2014 to 72 at December 31, 2015;  

increased costs for externally conducted studies, including various in vivo studies, proof of concept 

studies and dose ranging and toxicity studies conducted in connection with the development of our 

product candidates;  

 
 
PAGE 12 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Management Board Report 

 

 

 

 

costs for the production of QR-010 and QR-110 compounds, including the costs of a GMP batch of QR-

010 in preparation of our Phase 1b clinical study;  

increased laboratory costs including purchases of compounds and laboratory materials used by the 

research and development staff in proportion to the increase in the number of employees, and increased 

costs for the use of laboratories;  

increased project-related consultancy costs, including regulatory and intellectual property support; and  

increased share-based compensation, reflecting grants of share options to research and development 

staff made after we adopted our Option Plan in September 2013.  

General and administrative costs increased to € 6,837,000 in 2015 from € 6,507,000 in 2014. These general 

and administrative costs comprise employee costs, office costs, general consultancy costs and other costs. 

The increase was primarily related to:  

 

 

 

 

increased staff costs associated with the increase of our general and administrative staff from 19 full-

time equivalent employees at December 31, 2014 to 27 full-time equivalent employees at December 31, 

2015;  

increased office and general costs, including office rent, information technology and communication 

costs, travel costs and office consumables, as well as costs to improve our internal control environment 

in 2015;  

increased costs for legal support, accounting and other consultancy costs, including costs incurred in 

preparation of our IPO amounting to € 1,763,000 in 2014, resulting in a modest increase of total G&A 

costs in 2015; and  

increased share-based compensation, reflecting grants of share options to non-research and 

development staff made after we adopted our Option Plan in September 2013. 

In 2015 share-based compensation amounted to € 1,212,000, compared to € 646,000 in 2014. Net financial 

income amounted to € 6,171,000, compared to € 4,334,000 in 2014. This increase in financial income results 

from the interest income on the proceeds of our IPO and particularly foreign exchange differences on cash 

denominated in U.S. dollars.  

Outlook 

We expect to continue growing in 2016 in terms of research and development expenses as well as the 

number of employees compared to 2015. We believe we have sufficient cash to fund these expenses and to 

prepare the Company for future growth. Given the development stage of the Company, we do not anticipate 

revenues in the foreseeable future. 

Leiden, March 31, 2016 

On behalf of the Management Board, 

Daniel de Boer 

CEO 

 
 
PAGE 13 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Supervisory Board Report 

Supervisory Board Report 

ProQR Therapeutics has chosen for its governance structure to be a so-called two-tier system. In such a 

setting the Supervisory Board supervises and advises the Management Board in performing their 

management tasks and setting the strategy of the Company. The Supervisory Board as well as its individual 

members act in the interests of ProQR, its business and development and all of its stakeholders. 

During the year we welcomed James Shannon as Boardmember-elect. James is a seasoned pharma executive 

with ample know how in drug development from his previous positions as Chief Medical Officer at Glaxo 

SmithKline and Global Head Pharma Development at Novartis. With this, we believe that the Board is 

complete. All of the relevant industry-expertise is represented and as a collective the board members bring a 

wealth of experience in building and growing successful companies. Our interactions as a group as well as in 

the sub committees over the last year were intense and constructive. We believe that the executive Board of 

Directors benefitted from these interactions and, vice versa, it further strengthened the Supervisory Board’s 

confidence in our management. 

Below is a more specific description of the Supervisory Board’s activities during the financial year 2015 and 

other relevant information on its functioning. 

Activities of the Supervisory Board 

The Supervisory Board and the Board of Directors met 4 times during 2015, and have held various additional 

informal meetings and telephone conferences, both collectively and individually. During these meetings, the 

progress of the various projects, the main risks of the business, the funding and the strategic direction of the 

Company were discussed. In addition, a two day off-site was held during which specifically the long-term 

strategy of the company was discussed. The Supervisory Board meetings were very well attended (100%) and 

the Committees reported back on their activities to the full Supervisory Board on a regular basis. 

Committees of the Supervisory Board 

We have an audit committee, a compensation committee and a nominating and corporate governance 

committee. We have adopted a charter for each of these committees.  

Compensation Committee 

The Compensation Committee has met 3 times in 2015. 

Compensation report 2015 

In September 2014, the supervisory board adopted our Compensation Policy. This Compensation Policy also 

applied to the financial year 2015 and will apply to subsequent years. The Compensation Policy is designed 

based on the following principles: 

 

Three compensation pillars consisting of: 

 

 

 

Annual Base Salary 

Short Term Incentive (annual cash bonus) 

Long Term Incentive (Stock Option Plan) 

 

 

Flexibility: the Compensation Policy should provide flexibility to allow the Supervisory Board, acting on 

the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, to reward the Management Board in a fair and 

equitable manner; 

This Compensation Policy should drive the right kind of management behaviour, discourage unjustified 

risk taking and minimise any gaming opportunity; 

 
 
PAGE 14 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Supervisory Board Report 

 

This Compensation Policy should pay for performance, taking into account not only the measurable 

financial performance of / or milestones achieved by the Company, but also, where appropriate, the 

efforts made by the Management Board, individually and as a whole, in managing the Company. For the 

variable components, the Compensation Committee performs an analysis of the possible outcomes 

under different scenarios; 

  Design of the Compensation Policy shall be based on current legislation applicable in the Netherlands; 
 

This Compensation Policy shall foster alignment of interests with shareholders;  

 

 

The pension of the Management Board shall be based on the defined contribution system; and 

Pay differentials and position within the Company are taken into account and are considered and 

evaluated regularly.   

Annual Base Salary 

The Compensation Committee reviewed the annual base salary of the Management Board taking into 

consideration the Compensation Reference Group as contained in the Compensation Policy. Based on this 

review the annual base salary levels for 2015 have been set at EUR 285,000 for the CEO, Daniel de Boer and 

at EUR 255,000 for the chief corporate development officer and general counsel, René Beukema. 

Short Term Incentive  

The Compensation Committee reviewed the performance of the Company during 2015 in comparison to the 

objectives and reviewed the achievements of the members of the Management Board versus their personal 

objectives.  

Based on the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, the Supervisory Board decided early 2016 

that the CEO Daniel de Boer has achieved 100% and the chief corporate development officer and general 

counsel, René Beukema has achieved 100% of the objectives that had been set to determine their individual 

bonus awards for the year 2015. For 2015 the individual bonuses have been set at EUR 99,750 for Daniel de 

Boer and EUR 62,500 for René Beukema. These bonuses will be paid in cash in the first quarter of 2016.  

Long Term Incentive 

Based on the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, the Supervisory Board decided to grant 

stock options in 2015 to the CEO, Daniel de Boer and the chief corporate development officer and general 

counsel, René Beukema. Based on this decision stock options with an exercise price of USD 18.32 have been 

granted with respect to 23,902 shares to the CEO, Daniel de Boer and 8,713 shares to the chief corporate 

development officer and general counsel, René Beukema.  

Pensions 

The pension contributions paid during 2015 amount to EUR 10,180 for the CEO, Daniel de Boer and EUR 

14,304 for the chief corporate development officer and general counsel, René Beukema. 

Supervisory board remuneration 

In September 2014, our shareholders approved a compensation policy whereby members of our supervisory 

board will receive board fees of € 25,000 per year and the chairperson will receive board fees of € 30,000 per 

year. In addition, each board committee chairperson will receive € 5,000 per year for service on such 

committee (except for the chairperson for the nominating committee who will receive € 3,000), and each 

other member of a board committee will receive € 3,000 per year for service on such committee. On top of 

 
 
PAGE 15 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Supervisory Board Report 

that several supervisory board members were granted options as set out in Note 23 to the financial 

statements or EUR 40,000 in cash. 

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee 

The chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee elected to involve the entire 

Supervisory Board in the selection process of additional Supervisory Board members. Hence no formal 

nomination committee meeting was held. Based on discussions held, James Shannon was nominated to join 

the Supervisory Board. His appointment is subject to approval of the Annual General Meeting of 

Shareholders in June 2016. 

Audit Committee 

The audit committee met five times in 2015. Main topics addressed were the quarterly results, enterprise risk 

management and SOx implementation, F-3 shelf filing and the management letter of the external auditor for 

2015. 

The audit committee also reviewed ProQR’s annual financial statements, including non-financial information, 

prior to publication thereof. These financial statements for 2015 have been audited and provided with an 

unqualified opinion by our external auditor, Deloitte Accountants B.V., and were extensively discussed with 

the auditors in the meetings of the Supervisory Board, Audit Committee and Management Board on March 

24, 2016. The Supervisory Board is of the opinion that the Financial Statements 2015 meet all requirements 

and recommends that the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders adopts the financial statements and the 

appropriation of net result proposed by the Management Board. 

The Company’s external auditor attended all Audit Committee meetings. The Audit Committee evaluates the 

performance of Deloitte as independent external auditor annually. Due to the limited size of the Company, it 

was concluded that there was currently no need to appoint an internal auditor. 

The Supervisory Board is responsible for the quality of its own performance and it discusses, once a year on 

its own, without the members of the Management Board present, both its own functioning and that of the 

individual members, and the functioning of the Management Board and that of its individual members. The 

Supervisory Board discussed its composition and competencies and has nominated James Shannon to join 

the Supervisory Board based on this review. We feel the additional efforts of all staff at ProQR form a strong 

foundation for the success and growth of the Company and all milestones reached this past year. Therefore, 

we would like to express our thanks to the members of the Management Board, senior management and all 

other employees for their contribution and performance during the year. In particular we thank our 

shareholders for their continued support. 

Leiden, March 31, 2016 

On behalf of the Supervisory Board, 

Dinko Valerio 

Chairman 

 
 
 
PAGE 16 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Corporate Governance 

Corporate Governance 

ProQR attaches great importance to corporate governance. In this report, the Company addresses its overall 

corporate governance structure and states to what extent and how it applies the principles and best practice 

provisions of the Dutch Corporate Governance Code (“DCGC” or “the Code”). This report also includes the 

information which the Company is required to disclose pursuant to the Dutch governmental decree on Article 

10 Takeover Directive and the governmental decree on Corporate Governance.  

Deviations from certain aspects of the Code, when deemed necessary in the interests of the Company, will be 

disclosed in the Annual Report. Deviations are due to our Company being listed in the United States with 

most of our investors being outside of the Netherlands, as well as to the international business focus of our 

Company. As a Company listed on NASDAQ, we comply with NASDAQ’s corporate governance listing 

standards, except for instances where we follow our home country’s corporate governance practices in lieu of 

certain NASDAQ’s standards as explained below, as NASDAQ investors are more familiar with NASDAQ’s rules 

than with the Code. 

Substantial changes in the Company’s corporate governance structure and in the Company’s compliance with 

the DCGC, if any, will be submitted to the General Meeting of Shareholders for discussion under a separate 

agenda item. The Supervisory Board and the Management Board, which are responsible for the corporate 

governance structure of the Company, are of the opinion that the principles and best practice provisions of 

the DCGC that are addressed to the management board and the supervisory board, interpreted and 

implemented in line with the best practices followed by the Company, are being applied.  

The full text of the DCGC can be found at the website of the Monitoring Commission Corporate Governance 

Code (www.commissiecorporategovernance.nl) and for an overview of our conformity with the Code the 

following documents are available at our website (www.ProQR.com): audit committee charter, compensation 

committee charter, nominating and corporate governance committee charter and our code of business 

conduct and ethics. 

Management Board 

Our management board is responsible for the day-to-day management of our operations under the 

supervision of the supervisory board. The management board is required to:  

 

 

 

keep the supervisory board informed in a timely manner in order to allow the supervisory board to carry 

out its responsibilities;  

consult with the supervisory board on important matters; and  

submit certain important decisions to the supervisory board for its approval.  

Our management board may perform all acts necessary or useful for achieving our corporate purposes, 

other than those acts that are prohibited by law or by our articles of association. The management board as a 

whole and any management board member individually, are authorized to represent us in dealings with third 

parties.  

Under our articles of association, the number of management board members is determined by the 

supervisory board, and the management board must consist of at least one member. The supervisory board 

elects a CEO from among the members of the management board.  

 
 
PAGE 17 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Corporate Governance 

Members of the management board are appointed by the general meeting of shareholders upon a binding 

nomination of the supervisory board. Our general meeting of shareholders may at all times deprive such a 

nomination of its binding character by a resolution passed by at least two-thirds of the votes cast 

representing more than 50% of our issued share capital, following which our supervisory board shall draw up 

a new binding nomination.  

Our management board rules provide that, unless the resolution appointing a management board member 

provides otherwise, members of our management board will serve for a maximum term of four years. Our 

articles of association provide that the management board members must retire periodically in accordance 

with a rotation schedule adopted by the management board. A management board member who retires in 

accordance with the rotation schedule may be reappointed immediately for a term of not more than four 

years at a time.  

Supervisory Board  

Our supervisory board is responsible for the supervision of the activities of our management board and our 

Company’s general affairs and business. Our supervisory board may, also on its own initiative, provide the 

management board with advice and may request any information from the management board that it deems 

appropriate. In performing its duties, the supervisory board is required to act in the interests of our Company 

(including its stakeholders) and its associated business as a whole. The members of the supervisory board 

are not authorized to represent us in dealings with third parties.  

Pursuant to Dutch law, members of the supervisory board must be natural persons. Under our articles of 

association, the number of supervisory board members is determined by our supervisory board itself, 

provided there will be at least three supervisory board members. Our articles of association provide that 

members of the supervisory board are appointed by the general meeting of shareholders upon a binding 

nomination by the supervisory board. Our general meeting of shareholders may at all times deprive such a 

nomination of its binding character by a resolution passed by at least two-thirds of the votes cast 

representing more than 50% of our issued share capital, following which our supervisory board shall draw up 

a new binding nomination.  

Our supervisory board rules provide that members of our supervisory board will serve for a maximum 

duration of three four-year terms. Our articles of association provide that the supervisory board members 

must retire periodically in accordance with a rotation schedule adopted by the supervisory board. A 

supervisory board member who retires in accordance with the rotation schedule can be reappointed 

immediately. The rotation schedule provides that the terms of office of the members of our supervisory 

board are staggered, such that approximately one-fourth of our supervisory board members will be subject 

to election in any one year and which has the effect of creating a staggered board (which may in turn deter a 

takeover attempt). The supervisory board appoints a chairman from among its members.  

Save for Antoine Papiernik, each member of our supervisory board has been and remains fully independent 

within the meaning of best practice provision III.2.2 of the DCGC. Mr. Papiernik is affiliated with Sofinnova 

which holds 11.9 % of our shares and is therefore not independent within the meaning of best practice 

provision III.2.2.f of the Code. We feel this deviation is justified by his specific knowledge and experience of 

our business. Based on the above, we comply with best practice provision III.2.1 of the DCGC, according to 

which not more than one supervisory board member is allowed not to be independent. 

Under our articles of association, the general meeting of shareholders may suspend or remove supervisory 

board members at any time. A resolution of our general meeting of shareholders to suspend or remove a 

supervisory board member may be passed by a simple majority of the votes cast, provided that the 

resolution is based on a proposal by our supervisory board. In the absence of a proposal by our supervisory 

 
 
PAGE 18 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Corporate Governance 

board, a resolution of our general meeting of shareholders to suspend or remove a supervisory board 

member shall require a majority of at least two-thirds of the votes cast representing more than 50% of our 

issued share capital.  

In a meeting of the supervisory board, each supervisory board member is entitled to cast one vote. A 

supervisory board member may grant a written proxy to another supervisory board member to represent 

him at a meeting of the supervisory board. All resolutions by our supervisory board are adopted by a simple 

majority of the votes cast unless our supervisory board rules provide otherwise. In case of a tie in any vote of 

the supervisory board, the chairman of the supervisory board shall have the casting vote. Our supervisory 

board may also adopt resolutions outside a meeting, provided that such resolutions are adopted in writing, 

all supervisory board members are familiar with the resolution to be passed and provided that no 

supervisory board member objects to such decision-making process. 

Committees of the Supervisory Board  

We have an audit committee, a compensation committee and a nominating and corporate governance 

committee. We have adopted a charter for each of these committees.  

Audit Committee  

Our audit committee consists of Paul Baart (chairman), Antoine Papiernik and Alison Lawton. Paul Baart was 

appointed at our AGM on June 10, 2015. Until that date, Henri Termeer was the chairman of the audit 

committee. Each member satisfies the independence requirements of the NASDAQ listing standards / Rule 

10A-3(b)(1) under the Exchange Act, and each member, with the exception of Antoine Papiernik as stated 

above, meets  the criteria for independence set forth in best practice III.2.2 of the DCGC. Paul Baart, Henri 

Termeer and Antoine Papiernik each qualify as an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined by the SEC in 

Item 16A: “Audit Committee Financial Expert” and as determined by our supervisory board. The audit 

committee oversees our accounting and financial reporting processes and the audits of our financial 

statements. The audit committee is responsible for, among other things:  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

the operation of the internal risk management and control systems, including supervision of the 

enforcement of relevant primary and secondary legislation, and supervising the operation of codes of 

conduct; 

the provision of financial information by the company (choice of accounting policies, application and 

assessment of the effects of new rules, information about the handling of estimated items in the financial 

statements, forecasts, work of internal and external auditors, etc.); 

compliance with recommendations and observations of internal and external auditors; 

reviewing the need for an internal audit function; 

the policy of the company on tax planning; 

relations with the external auditor, including, in particular, his independence, remuneration and any non-

audit services for the company; 

the financing of the company; and 

the applications of information and communication technology. 

Compensation Committee  

Our compensation committee consists of Antoine Papiernik (chairman), Dinko Valerio, Henri Termeer and 

Alison Lawton. Each member satisfies the independence requirements of the NASDAQ listing standards / Rule 

10A-3(b)(1) under the Exchange Act, and each member, with the exception of Antoine Papiernik, meets the 

criteria for independence set forth in best practice III.2.2 of the DCGC. The compensation committee assists 

our supervisory board in reviewing and approving or recommending our compensation structure, including 

all forms of compensation relating to our supervisory board members, our management board members 

and our officers. Members of our management board may not be present at any compensation committee 

 
 
PAGE 19 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Corporate Governance 

meeting while their compensation is deliberated. Subject to and in accordance with the terms of the 

compensation policy approved by our general meeting of shareholders from time to time, as required by 

Dutch law, the compensation committee is responsible for, among other things:  

  making a proposal to the supervisory board for the remuneration policy to be pursued; 

  making a proposal for the remuneration of the individual members of the management board, for 

adoption by the supervisory board; such proposal shall, in any event, deal with: (i) the remuneration 

structure and (ii) the amount of the fixed remuneration, the shares and/or options to be granted and/or 

other variable remuneration components, pension rights, redundancy pay and other forms of 

compensation to be awarded, as well as the performance criteria and their application; and 

 

preparing the remuneration report as referred to in best practice provision II.2.12. 

Our supervisory board may also delegate certain tasks and powers under our Option Plan to the 

compensation committee.  

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee  

Our nominating and corporate governance committee consists of Dinko Valerio (chairman), Henri Termeer 

and Paul Baart. Each member satisfies the independence requirements of the NASDAQ listing standards as 

well as the criteria for independence set forth in best practice III.2.2 of the DCGC. The nominating and 

corporate governance committee assists our supervisory board in selecting individuals qualified to become 

our supervisory board members and management board members and in determining the composition of 

the management board, supervisory board and its committees and our officers. The nominating and 

corporate governance committee is responsible for, among other things:  

 

 

 

drawing up selection criteria and appointment procedures for supervisory board members and 

management board members; 

periodically assessing the size and composition of the supervisory board and the management board, 

and making a proposal for a composition profile of the supervisory board; 

periodically assessing the functioning of individual supervisory board members and management board 

members, and reporting on this to the supervisory board; 
  making proposals for appointments and reappointments; and 

 

supervising the policy of the management board on the selection criteria and appointment procedures 

for senior management. 

Insurance and Indemnification of Management Board and Supervisory Board Members  

Under Dutch law, management board members, supervisory board members and certain other 

representatives may be held liable for damages in the event of improper or negligent performance of their 

duties. They may be held jointly and severally liable for damages to the Company for infringement of the 

articles of association or of certain provisions of the Dutch Civil Code. They may also be liable towards third 

parties for infringement of certain provisions of the Dutch Civil Code. In certain circumstances they may also 

incur additional specific civil and criminal liabilities.  

Our articles of association provide that we will indemnify our management board members, supervisory 

board members, former management board members and former supervisory board members (each an 

“Indemnified Person”) against (i) any financial losses or damages incurred by such Indemnified Person and 

(ii) any expense reasonably paid or incurred by such Indemnified Person in connection with any threatened, 

pending or completed suit, claim, action or legal proceedings, whether civil, criminal, administrative or 

investigative and whether formal or informal, in which he becomes involved, to the extent this relates to his 

position with the Company, in each case to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law. No indemnification 

shall be given to an Indemnified Person (a) if a Dutch court has established, without possibility for appeal, 

 
 
PAGE 20 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Corporate Governance 

that the acts or omissions of such Indemnified Person that led to the financial losses, damages, suit, claim, 

action or legal proceedings result from either an improper performance of his duties as an officer of the 

Company or an unlawful or illegal act and (b) to the extent that his financial losses, damages and expenses 

are covered by an insurance and the insurer has settled these financial losses, damages and expenses (or has 

indicated that it would do so). Our supervisory board may stipulate additional terms, conditions and 

restrictions in relation to such indemnification.  

Board composition and diversity 

Our management board comprised two persons in 2015, both of whom are male. Our supervisory board has 

four male members and one female member. As a Company, we support diversity of culture, gender and age 

in our Company. Our current management board and supervisory board members were selected based on 

the required profile and talent and abilities of the members without positive or negative bias on gender, 

culture or age. In the future, this will continue to be our basis for selection of new board members. 

Controls and procedures 

Our managing board and our chief financial officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of our disclosure 

controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of December 31, 2015, have 

concluded that based on the evaluation of these controls and procedures required by Rule 13a-15(b) of the 

Exchange Act, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective. The internal risk management and 

control systems provide reasonable assurance that the financial reporting does not contain any errors of 

material importance and that the risk management and control systems worked properly in the year under 

review. 

Risk factors and the risk management approach, as well as the sensitivity of our results to external factors 

and variables are described in more detail in ”Risk Management”. Our internal control system has been 

discussed with the Audit Committee and the external auditors. 

In view of the requirements of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act, procedures are in place to enable the CEO 

(chief executive officer) and the CFO (chief financial officer) to provide certifications with respect to the 

Annual Report on Form 20F. 

General Meeting of Shareholders 

General meetings of shareholders are held in Leiden, Amsterdam, Rotterdam, The Hague, or in the 

municipality of Haarlemmermeer (Schiphol Airport), the Netherlands. All shareholders and others entitled to 

attend general meetings of shareholders are authorized to attend the general meeting of shareholders, to 

address the meeting and, in so far as they have such right, to vote, either in person or by proxy.  

We must hold at least one general meeting of shareholders each year, to be held within six months after the 

end of our financial year. A general meeting of shareholders shall also be held within three months after our 

management board has considered it to be likely that the Company’s equity has decreased to an amount 

equal to or lower than half of its paid up and called up capital. If the management board and supervisory 

board have failed to ensure that such general meetings of shareholders as referred to in the preceding 

sentences are held in a timely fashion, each shareholder and other person entitled to attend shareholders’ 

meetings may be authorized by the Dutch court to convene the general meeting of shareholders. 

Our management board and our supervisory board may convene additional extraordinary general meetings 

of shareholders whenever they so decide. Pursuant to Dutch law, one or more shareholders and/or others 

entitled to attend general meetings of shareholders, alone or jointly representing at least ten percent of our 

issued share capital may on their application, be authorized by the Dutch court to convene a general meeting 

of shareholders. The Dutch court will disallow the application if it does not appear to it that the applicants 

 
 
PAGE 21 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Corporate Governance 

have previously requested that the management board or supervisory board convenes a shareholders’ 

meeting and neither the management board nor the supervisory board has taken the necessary steps so that 

the shareholders’ meeting could be held within six weeks after the request.  

General meetings of shareholders are convened by a notice which includes an agenda stating the items to be 

discussed. For the annual general meeting of shareholders the agenda will include, among other things, the 

adoption of our annual accounts, the appropriation of our profits or losses and proposals relating to the 

composition and filling of any vacancies of the management board or supervisory board. In addition, the 

agenda for a general meeting of shareholders includes such items as have been included therein by our 

management board or our supervisory board. Pursuant to Dutch law, one or more shareholders and/or 

others entitled to attend general meetings of shareholders, alone or jointly representing at least 3% of the 

issued share capital have the right to request the inclusion of additional items on the agenda of shareholders’ 

meetings. Such requests must be made in writing, substantiated, or by a proposal for a resolution and 

received by us no later than the sixtieth day before the day the relevant general meeting is held. No 

resolutions will be adopted on items other than those which have been included in the agenda.  

We will give notice of each general meeting of shareholders by publication on our website and, to the extent 

required by applicable law, in a Dutch daily newspaper with national distribution, and in any other manner 

that we may be required to follow in order to comply with Dutch law, applicable stock exchange and SEC 

requirements. We will observe the statutory minimum convening notice period for a general meeting of 

shareholders.  

Pursuant to our articles of association, our management board may determine a record date 

(registratiedatum) of 28 calendar days prior to a general meeting of shareholders to establish which 

shareholders and others with meeting rights are entitled to attend and, if applicable, vote in the general 

meeting of shareholders. The record date, if any, and the manner in which shareholders can register and 

exercise their rights will be set out in the convocation notice of the general meeting. Our articles of 

association provide that a shareholder must notify the Company in writing of his identity and his intention to 

attend (or be represented at) the general meeting of shareholders, such notice to be received by us ultimately 

on the seventh day prior to the general meeting. If this requirement is not complied with or if upon direction 

of the Company to that effect no proper identification is provided by any person wishing to enter the general 

meeting of shareholders, the chairman of the general meeting of shareholders may, in his sole discretion, 

refuse entry to the shareholder or his proxy holder.  

Pursuant to our articles of association, our general meeting of shareholders is chaired by the chairman of our 

supervisory board. If the chairman of our supervisory board is absent and has not charged another person to 

chair the meeting in his place, the supervisory board members present at the meeting shall appoint one of 

them to be chairman. If no supervisory board members are present at the general meeting of shareholders, 

the general meeting of shareholders will be chaired by our CEO or, if our CEO is absent, another managing 

board member present at the meeting and, if none of them is present, the general meeting shall appoint its 

own chairman. The person who should chair the meeting may appoint another person in his stead.  

The chairman of the general meeting may decide at his discretion to admit other persons to the meeting. The 

chairman of the general meeting shall appoint another person present at the shareholders’ meeting to act as 

secretary and to minute the proceedings at the meeting. The chairman of the general meeting may instruct a 

civil law notary to draw up a notarial report of the proceedings at the Company’s expense, in which case no 

minutes need to be taken. The chairman of the general meeting is authorized to eject any person from the 

general meeting of shareholders if the chairman considers that person to disrupt the orderly proceedings. 

The general meeting of shareholders shall be conducted in the English language. 

 
 
PAGE 22 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Corporate Governance 

Voting Rights and Quorum Requirements  

In accordance with Dutch law and our articles of association, each issued ordinary share and preferred share 

confers the right on the holder thereof to cast one vote at the general meeting of shareholders. The voting 

rights attached to any shares held by us or our direct or indirect subsidiaries are suspended as long as they 

are held in treasury. Dutch law does not permit cumulative voting for the election of management board 

members or supervisory board members.  

Voting rights may be exercised by shareholders or by a duly appointed proxy holder (the written proxy being 

acceptable to the chairman of the general meeting of shareholders) of a shareholder, which proxy holder 

need not be a shareholder. Our articles of association do not limit the number of shares that may be voted by 

a single shareholder.  

Under our articles of association, blank votes, abstentions and invalid votes shall not be counted as votes 

cast. Further, shares in respect of which a blank or invalid vote has been cast and shares in respect of which 

the person with meeting rights who is present or represented at the meeting has abstained from voting are 

counted when determining the part of the issued share capital that is present or represented at a general 

meeting of shareholders. The chairman of the general meeting shall determine the manner of voting and 

whether voting may take place by acclamation.  

In accordance with Dutch law and generally accepted business practices, our articles of association do not 

provide quorum requirements generally applicable to general meetings of shareholders. To this extent, our 

practice varies from the requirement of NASDAQ Listing Rule 5620(c), which requires an issuer to provide in 

its bylaws for a generally applicable quorum, and that such quorum may not be less than one-third of the 

outstanding voting shares.  

Resolutions of the general meeting of shareholders are adopted by a simple majority of votes cast without 

quorum requirement, except where Dutch law or our articles of association provide for a special majority 

and/or quorum in relation to specified resolutions.  

Anti-takeover provisions 

We have adopted several provisions that may have the effect of making a takeover of our Company more 

difficult or less attractive, including: 

 

granting a perpetual and repeatedly exercisable call option to a protection foundation, which confers 

upon the protection foundation the right to acquire, under certain conditions, the number of preferred 

 

 

 

shares in the capital of the Company. The issuance of such preferred shares will occur upon the 

protection foundation’s exercise of the call option and will not require shareholder consent; 

the staggered four-year terms of our supervisory board members, as a result of which only 

approximately one-fourth of our supervisory board members will be subject to election in any one year; 

a provision that our management board members and supervisory board members may only be 

appointed upon a binding nomination by our supervisory board, which can be set aside by a two-thirds 

majority of our shareholders representing more than half of our issued share capital;  

a provision that our management board members and supervisory board members may only be 

removed by our general meeting of shareholders by a two-thirds majority of votes cast representing 

more than 50% of our issued share capital (unless the removal was proposed by the supervisory board); 

and  

 

a requirement that certain matters, including an amendment of our articles of association, may only be 

brought to our shareholders for a vote upon a proposal by our management board that has been 

approved by our supervisory board.  

 
 
PAGE 23 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Corporate Governance 

Deviations from the Dutch Corporate Governance Code 

The Code contains a “comply-or-explain” principle, offering the possibility to deviate from the Code as long as 

any such deviations are explained. We acknowledge the importance of good corporate governance. However, 

at this stage, we do not comply with all the provisions of the DCGC, to a large extent because we believe that 

deviations from such provisions  are in the interest of the Company, e.g. in order to attract and maintain 

individuals with specific biotech expertise. The main deviations from best practice provisions are listed below. 

 

Pursuant to the best practice provisions II.2.4 and II.2.5 of the DCGC, options granted to our 

management board members should not be exercisable during the first three years after the date of 

grant; shares granted to our management board members for no financial consideration should be 

retained by them for a period of at least five years or until they cease to hold office, whichever is the 

shorter period; and the number of options and/or shares granted to our management board members 

should be dependent on the achievement of pre-determined performance criteria. We do not intend to 

comply with all of the above requirements as we believe it is in the best interest of the company to 

attract and retain highly skilled management board members on conditions based on market practice, as 

we believe these are.  

 

Pursuant to best practice provision II.2.8 the remuneration of the management board in the event of 

dismissal may not exceed one year’s salary. The management services agreements with our 

management board members provide for a lump-sum equal to 24 months of the individual’s monthly 

gross fixed salary. Based on the risk profile of the Company and to be able to attract highly skilled 

management, we assumed this period to be appropriate. 

  Best practice provision III.7.1 prohibits the granting of shares or rights to shares to members of the 

supervisory board as compensation. It is common practice for companies listed on the NASDAQ Global 

Market to grant shares to the members of the supervisory board as compensation, in order to align the 

interests of the members of the supervisory board with our interests and those of our shareholders, and 

we have granted and expect to grant options to acquire ordinary shares to some of our supervisory 

board members.  

 

Pursuant to best practice provision III.7.2, any shares held by supervisory board members are long-term 

investments. We do not request our supervisory board members to comply to this provision. We believe 

it is in the best interest of the Company not to apply this provision in order to be able to attract and 

retain highly skilled supervisory board members on internationally competitive terms. 

  Best practice provision IV.1.1 provides that the general meeting of shareholders may pass a resolution to 

cancel the binding nature of a nomination for the appointment of a member of the management board 

or of the supervisory board or a resolution to dismiss such member by an absolute majority of the votes 

cast. It may be provided that such majority should represent a given proportion of the issued capital, but 

this proportion may not exceed one third. In addition, best practice IV.1.1. provides that if such 

proportion of the share capital is not represented at the meeting, but an absolute majority of the votes 

cast is in favor of a resolution to cancel the binding nature of the nomination, a new general meeting of 

shareholders will be convened where the resolution may be adopted by absolute majority, regardless of 

the proportion of the share capital represented at the meeting. Our articles of association provide that 

these resolutions can only be adopted with at least a 2/3 majority which must represent more than 50% 

of our issued capital, and that no such second meeting will be convened, because we believe that the 

decision to overrule a nomination by the management board or the supervisory board for the 

appointment or dismissal of a member of our management board or of our supervisory board must be 

widely supported by our shareholders.  

  Best practice provision IV.3.1 stipulates that meetings with analysts, presentations to analysts, 

presentations to investors and institutional investors and press conferences must be announced in 

advance on the Company’s website and by means of press releases. Provision must be made for all 

shareholders to follow these meetings and presentations in real time, for example by means of 

webcasting or telephone. After the meetings, the presentations must be posted on the Company’s 

 
 
PAGE 24 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Corporate Governance 

website. We believe that enabling shareholders to follow in real time all the meetings with analysts, 

presentations to analysts and presentations to investors, would create an excessive burden on our 

resources and therefore, we do not intend to comply with all of the above requirements.  

  Best practice provision IV.3.13 stipulates that an outline policy on bilateral contacts with the shareholders 

shall be formulated and published on the Company’s website. The Company has not formulated such 

policy as it believes this is already covered by our regular process for public disclosure of information. 

Summary of significant corporate governance differences from NASDAQ Listing Standards 

Our ordinary shares are listed on NASDAQ. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as related rules 

subsequently implemented by the SEC, requires foreign private issuers, including our Company, to comply 

with various corporate governance practices. As a foreign private issuer, subject to certain exceptions, the 

NASDAQ listing standards permit a foreign private issuer to follow its home country practice in lieu of the 

NASDAQ listing standards. Our corporate governance practices differ in certain respects from those that U.S. 

companies must adopt in order to maintain a NASDAQ listing. The home country practices followed by our 

Company in lieu of NASDAQ rules are described below:  

  We do not intend to follow NASDAQ’s quorum requirements applicable to meetings of shareholders. In 

accordance with Dutch law and generally accepted business practice, our articles of association do not 

provide quorum requirements generally applicable to general meetings of shareholders.  

  We do not intend to follow NASDAQ’s requirements regarding the provision of proxy statements for 

general meetings of shareholders. Dutch law does not have a regulatory regime for the solicitation of 

proxies and the solicitation of proxies is not a generally accepted business practice in the Netherlands. 

We do intend to provide shareholders with an agenda and other relevant documents for the general 

meeting of shareholders and shareholders will be entitled to give proxies and voting instructions to us 

and/or third parties. 

We intend to take all actions necessary for us to maintain compliance as a foreign private issuer under the 

applicable corporate governance requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the rules adopted by the 

SEC and NASDAQ’s listing standards.  

 
 
PAGE 25 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Risk Management 

Risk Management 

Our business is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties. In the table below, we focus on the key risks and 

uncertainties the Company currently faces. For the avoidance of doubt, this does not mean that the risks 

which were previously signaled and not described here are no longer relevant. For a complete understanding 

of the risks that we face you should also read the full list of risks and uncertainties as disclosed in item 3.D 

Risk Factors of the annual report on Form 20-F. Some of these risks and uncertainties are outside the control 

of the Company, others may be influenced or mitigated. In 2015, we have implemented a Risk & Control 

framework, based on the COSO 2013 internal control framework, to secure the Company’s in-control 

position. Consequently, our control environment has improved significantly compared to last year. As part of 

the SOx implementation program for 2016, we will further enhance the COSO 2013 framework and entity 

level controls. Improvement of our Risk & Control framework is an ongoing effort for the Company. 

Our main risks are those that threaten the achievement of the Company’s objectives, as well as the in-control 

position of the Company. If any of these risks actually occurs, our business, prospects, operating results and 

financial condition could suffer materially. These risks include, but are not limited to, the following:  

Risk related to 

Risk area 

Expected impact upon 
materialization 

Risk-mitigating actions 

Development and 
Regulatory Approval of 
our Product Candidates 

Our products will not be able to 

The Company will be unable to 

This is an inherent risk with drug 

demonstrate safety and efficacy 

commercialize the product and 

development as the safety and 

in the preclinical studies and 

therefore generate revenues. 

efficacy of products can only be 

clinical trials that are needed to 

obtain product approval. 

assessed when these studies 

are conducted. However, the 

Company has multiple products 

in the pipeline and therefore is 

diversified. The Company also 

monitors the progress of the 

programs and aims to make 

decisions that mitigate safety 

and efficacy related risks. 

The regulatory approval process 

Failure to comply with the 

Although the Company 

is lengthy, time-consuming and 

requirements in the regulatory 

monitors the regulatory 

unpredictable and products 

process could result in delays, 

landscape and engages with the 

developed may ultimately not 

suspension, refusals and 

authorities when it deems that 

lead to regulatory approval of 

withdrawal of approvals as well 

necessary, this is an inherent 

the product. 

as fines. 

risk in biotech drug 

development and therefore has 
limited mitigation abilities. 

We may not able to maintain 
orphan product exclusivity for 

We may not be able to obtain 
approval for our competing 

We have been granted orphan 
drug designation for QR-010 

QR-010 or obtain such status for 
QR-110 or future product 

products for a significant period 
of time. 

and have applied for orphan 
drug designation for QR-110. 

candidates for which we seek 
this status, or our competitors 

may be able to obtain orphan 
product exclusivity before we 

do. 

We intend to make the 
applications for other product 

candidates that meet the 
requirements. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PAGE 26 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Risk Management 

Risk related to 

Risk area 

Expected impact upon 
materialization 

Risk-mitigating actions 

Capital Needs and 
Financial Position 

The Company depends largely 

Volatility of the Company’s 

The ability of third party 

on equity financing and 

share price, failure to deliver 

financing is dependent on 

financing through third party 

under collaboration agreements 

external factors and is therefore 

collaboration agreements and 

and/or the reevaluation or 

not entirely in the Company’s 

government subsidies.  

withdrawal of government 

control. The Company monitors 

subsidies may have a negative 

the market conditions for 

impact on the Company's ability 

opportunities to add additional 

to obtain future financing. 

capital. 

Dependence on Third 
Parties 

The Company relies upon third-

Failure of third parties to 

The Company reviews and 

party contractors and service 

provide services of a suitable 

monitors the activities of the 

providers for the execution of 

quality and within acceptable 

third parties. These include 

several aspects of its preclinical 

timeframes may cause delay or 

setting contractual deliverables, 

and clinical development 

failure of the Company's 

quality assurance audits and 

programs, which include CRO’s, 

development programs. 

performance reports, among 

third party manufacturers and 

other service providers. 

other activities. 

Intellectual Property 

The Company is highly 

Inadequate intellectual property 

The Company files and 

dependent on its portfolio of 

protection or enforcement may 

prosecutes patent applications 

patents and other intellectual 

impede the Company’s ability to 

to protect its products and 

property, proprietary 

compete effectively. If the 

technologies to the best of its 

information and knowhow and 

Company is not able to protect 

knowledge and with assistance 

its ability to protect and enforce 

its trade secrets, know-how or 

from internal and external 

these assets.  

other proprietary information, 

counsel. Prior to disclosing any 

the value of its technology and 

confidential information to third 

The Company is subject to the 

product candidates could be 

parties, the Company maintains 

risk of infringing third party 

significantly diminished. 

strict confidentiality standards 

intellectual property rights. 

Intellectual property rights 

and agreements for 

conflicts may result in costly 

collaborating parties.  

litigation and could result in the 

Company having to pay 

substantial damages or limit the 

Company’s ability to 

commercialize its product 

candidates. 

Commercialization of Our 
Product Candidates 

We face competition from 

If our competitors develop 

Competition is an inherent risk 

entities that have developed or 

technologies or product 

for any industry including drug 

may develop product 

candidates more rapidly than 

development. Through our IP 

candidates for our target 

we do or their technologies, 

strategy and orphan drug 

indications, including companies 

including delivery technologies, 

designation application, we 

developing novel treatments for 

are more effective, our ability to 

attempt to have data exclusivity 

CF patients.  

develop and successfully 

for our products. Development 

commercialize our product 
candidates may be adversely 

in other companies is essentially 
out of our control but we 

affected. 

monitor the competitive 
landscape and incorporate that 

into our business strategy. 

In addition to the above key risks, the Company’s activities expose it to a variety of financial risks: market risk 

(including currency risk, interest rate risk and price risk), credit risk and liquidity risk. Unfavorable exchange 

rate developments and historically low interest rates may impact the financial income of the Company. The 

Company has a cash management policy in place to minimize potential adverse effects resulting from 

unpredictability of financial markets on the Company’s financial performance. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PAGE 27 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Financial Statements 2015 

Financial Statements 2015 

Consolidated statement of financial position at December 31, 2015 

dsssds  

ASSETS 

Non-current assets 

Intangible assets 

Property, plant and equipment 

Current assets 

Social securities and other taxes 

Prepayments and other receivables 

Cash and cash equivalents 

TOTAL ASSETS 

EQUITY 

Shareholders' equity 

Share capital 

Share premium reserve 

Equity settled employee benefits reserve 

Translation reserve 

Accumulated deficit 

LIABILITIES 

Non-current liabilities 

Finance lease liabilities 

Borrowings 

Current liabilities 

Finance lease liabilities 

Trade payables 

Social securities and other taxes 

Pension premiums 

Deferred income 

Other current liabilities 

Note 

December 31, 
2015 

December 31, 
2014 

€ 1,000 

€ 1,000 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

141 

2,199 

2,340 

956 

1,948 

94,865 

97,769 

163 

1,187 

1,350 

426 

735 

112,736 

113,897 

100,109 

115,247 

934 

123,595 

1,899 

1 

(36,630) 

89,799 

-- 

4,824 

4,824 

15 

885 

235 

16 

144 

4,191 

5,486 

934 

123,581 

687 

-- 

(15,798) 

109,404 

15 

2,814 

2,829 

34 

1,247 

341 

127 

-- 

1,265 

3,014 

TOTAL EQUITY AND LIABILITIES 

100,109 

115,247 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
PAGE 28 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Financial Statements 2015 

Consolidated statement of profit or loss and comprehensive income for the year ended 
December 31, 2015 

dsssds  

Other income 

Research and development costs 

General and administrative costs 

Total operating costs 

Operating result 

Financial income and expense 

Result before corporate income taxes 

Corporate income taxes 

Note 

2015 

€ 1,000 

2014 

€ 1,000 

15 

16 

18 

19 

3,235 

313 

(23,401) 

(6,837) 

(10,267) 

(6,507) 

(30,238) 

(16,774) 

(27,003) 

6,171 

(16,461) 

4,334 

(20,832) 

(12,127) 

-- 

-- 

Result for the year (attributable to equity holders of the Company) 

(20,832) 

(12,127) 

Other comprehensive income 

Items that will never be reclassified to profit or loss 

Items that are or may be reclassified to profit or loss 

Foreign operations – foreign currency translation differences 

1 

-- 

Total comprehensive income for the year 
(attributable to equity holders of the Company) 

(20,831) 

(12,127) 

Share information 

20 

Weighted average number of shares outstanding1 

23,343,262 

11,082,801 

Earnings per share attributable to the equity holders  
of the Company (expressed in Euro per share) 

Basic earnings per share1 

Diluted earnings per share1 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 

(0.89) 

(0.89) 

(1.09) 

(1.09) 

1 Basic and diluted earnings are equal due to the anti-dilutive nature of the options outstanding since the Company is loss-
making. 

 
 
 
 
                                                                 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PAGE 29 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Financial Statements 2015 

Consolidated statement of changes in equity for the year ended December 31, 2015 

Share 
Capital 

Share 
Premium 

Equity 
Settled 
Employee 
Benefit 
Reserve 

Translation 
Reserve 

Accumulated 
Deficit 

Total 
Equity 

€ 1,000 

€ 1,000 

€ 1,000 

€ 1,000 

€ 1,000 

€ 1,000 

Balance at January 1, 2014 

59 

3,482 

Result for the year 

Recognition of share-based 
payments 

-- 

-- 

-- 

-- 

Shares issued in the period 

880 

122,291 

Treasury shares issued 

(5) 

(2,192) 

Balance at December 31, 2014 

934 

123,581 

Result for the year 

Other comprehensive income 

Recognition of share-based 
payments 

Share options exercised 

-- 

-- 

-- 

0 

-- 

-- 

-- 

14 

41 

-- 

646 

-- 

-- 

687 

-- 

-- 

1,212 

-- 

Balance at December 31, 2015 

934 

123,595 

1,899 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 

-- 

-- 

-- 

-- 

-- 

-- 

-- 

1 

-- 

-- 

1 

(3,671) 

(89) 

(12,127) 

(12,127) 

-- 

-- 

-- 

646 

123,171 

(2,197) 

(15,798) 

109,404 

(20,832) 

(20,832) 

-- 

-- 

-- 

1 

1,212 

14 

(36,630) 

89,799 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PAGE 30 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Financial Statements 2015 

Consolidated statement of cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2015 

dsssds  

Cash flow from operating activities 

Result for the year 

Adjustments for: 

— Depreciation 

— Share-based compensation 

— Financial income and expense 

Changes in working capital 

Cash used in operations 

Corporate income tax paid 

Interest received/(paid) 

Note 

2015 

€ 1,000 

2014 

€ 1,000 

(20,831) 

(12,127) 

7, 8    

12 

18 

480 

1,212 

(6,171) 

637 

(24,673) 

-- 

441 

126 

646 

(4,334) 

1,090 

(14,599) 

-- 

142 

Net cash used in operating activities 

(24,232) 

(14,457) 

Cash flow from investing activities 

Purchases of intangible assets 

Purchases of property, plant and equipment 

(28) 

(1,296) 

(124) 

(1,109) 

Net cash used in investing activities 

(1,324) 

(1,233) 

Cash flow from financing activities 

Net proceeds from issuance of shares 

Proceeds from exercise of share options 

Proceeds from borrowings 

Redemption of financial lease 

Net cash generated by financing activities 

Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 

Currency effect cash and cash equivalents 

Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year 

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 

12 

13 

13 

11 

11 

-- 

14 

1,640 

(34) 

118,250 

-- 

1,667 

(34) 

1,620 

119,883 

(23,936) 

104,193 

6,065 

112,736 

4,414 

4,129 

94,865 

112,736 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
PAGE 31 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Financial Statements 2015 

Notes to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015 

1. General Information  

ProQR Therapeutics N.V., or “ProQR” or the “Company”, is a development stage company domiciled in the 

Netherlands that primarily focuses on the development and commercialization of novel therapeutic 

medicines.  

Since September 18, 2014, the Company’s ordinary shares are listed on the NASDAQ Global Market under 

ticker symbol PRQR. 

The Company was incorporated in the Netherlands, on February 21, 2012 and has been reorganized from a 

private company with limited liability to a public company with limited liability on September 23, 2014. The 

Company has its statutory seat in Leiden, the Netherlands. The address of its headquarters and registered 

office is Darwinweg 24, 2333 CR Leiden, the Netherlands. 

Legal demerger of our Company was effectuated as per June 30, 2015. At December 31, 2015, ProQR 

Therapeutics N.V. is the ultimate parent company of the following entities: 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ProQR Therapeutics Holding B.V. (the Netherlands, 100%); 

ProQR Therapeutics I B.V. (the Netherlands, 100%); 

ProQR Therapeutics II B.V. (the Netherlands, 100%); 

ProQR Therapeutics III B.V. (the Netherlands, 100%); 

ProQR Therapeutics IV B.V. (the Netherlands, 100%); 

ProQR Therapeutics I Inc. (United States, 100%). 

As used in these consolidated financial statements, unless the context indicates otherwise, all references to 

“ProQR”, the “Company” or the “Group” refer to ProQR Therapeutics N.V. including its subsidiaries. 

2. Basis of preparation 

(a) Statement of compliance  

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial 

Reporting Standards, or IFRS, as adopted by the European Union (“EU”). 

With reference to the income statement of the Company, use has been made of the exemption pursuant to 

Section 402 of Book 2 of the Netherlands Civil Code. 

(b) Basis of measurement  

The financial statements have been prepared on the historical cost basis except for financial instruments and 

share-based payment obligations which have been based on fair value. Historical cost is generally based on 

the fair value of the consideration given in exchange for assets.  

(c) Functional and presentation currency 

These consolidated financial statements are presented in euro, which is the Company’s functional currency. 

All amounts have been rounded to the nearest thousand, unless otherwise indicated. 

(d) Going Concern  

The management board of ProQR has, upon preparing and finalizing the 2015 financial statements, assessed 

the Company’s ability to fund its operations for a period of at least one year after the date of signing these 

financial statements.  

 
 
PAGE 32 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Financial Statements 2015 

The management board of the Company is confident about the continuity of the Company based on its 

existing funding, taking into account the Company’s current cash position and the projected cash flows based 

on the activities under execution on the basis of ProQR’s business plan and budget, which includes, amongst 

other activities, clinical studies using QR-010 in patients suffering from cystic fibrosis. 

(e) Use of estimates and judgements  

In preparing these consolidated financial statements, management has made judgements, estimates and 

assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, 

income and expenses. Actual results may differ from these estimates.  

Estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates 

are recognized in the period in which the estimate is revised if the revision affects only that period or in the 

period of the revision and future periods if the revision affects both current and future periods.  

Information about assumptions and estimation uncertainties that may have a significant risk of resulting in a 

material adjustment is included below. 

(i) Share-based payments  

Share options granted to employees and consultants are measured at the fair value of the equity instruments 

granted. Fair value is determined through the use of an option-pricing model considering, among others, the 

following variables:  

 

 

 

 

 

 

The exercise price of the option;  

The expected life of the option;  

The current value of the underlying shares;  

The expected volatility of the share price;  

The dividends expected on the shares; and  

The risk-free interest rate for the life of the option.  

For the Company’s share option plans, management’s judgment is that the Black-Scholes valuation method is 

the most appropriate for determining the fair value of the Company’s share options.  

Initially, the Company’s ordinary shares were not publicly traded and consequently the Company needed to 

estimate the fair value of its share and the expected volatility of that value. The expected volatility of all 

options granted was therefore based on the average historical volatility of the Company’s peers over a period 

that agrees with the expected option life. All assumptions and estimates are further discussed in Note 12(e) 

to the financial statements. The value of the underlying shares was determined on the basis of the prior sale 

of company stock method. As such, the Company has benchmarked the value per share to external 

transactions of Company shares and external financing rounds.  

For options granted from the moment of listing, the Company uses the closing price of the ordinary shares 

on the previous business day as exercise price of the options granted. 

The result of the share option valuations and the related compensation expense is dependent on the model 

and input parameters used. Even though Management considers the fair values reasonable and defensible 

based on the methodologies applied and the information available, others might derive a different fair value 

for the Company’s share options. 

 
 
PAGE 33 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Financial Statements 2015 

(ii) Corporate income taxes  

The Company recognizes deferred tax assets arising from unused tax losses or tax credits only to the extent 

that the Company has sufficient taxable temporary differences or there is convincing evidence that sufficient 

taxable profit will be available against which the unused tax losses or unused tax credits can be utilized. 

Management’s judgment is that such convincing evidence is currently not sufficiently available and a deferred 

tax asset is therefore only recognized to the extent that the Company has sufficient taxable temporary 

differences.  

(iii) Grant income  

Grants (to be) received are reflected in the balance sheet as other receivables or deferred income. At each 

balance sheet date, for grants approved, the Company estimates the associated costs incurred, the level of 

service performed and the progress of the associated projects. Based on this analysis grant income is 

recognized. 

(iv) Research and development expenditures  

Research expenditures are currently not capitalized but are reflected in the income statement because the 

criteria for capitalization are not met. At each balance sheet date, the Company estimates the level of service 

performed by the vendors and the associated costs incurred for the services performed.  

Although we do not expect the estimates to be materially different from amounts actually incurred, the 

understanding of the status and timing of services performed relative to the actual status and timing of 

services performed may vary and could result in reporting amounts that are too high or too low in any 

particular period.  

(f) Changes in accounting policies  

The financial statements have been prepared on the basis of International Financial Reporting Standards 

(“IFRS”), as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”). New Standards and 

Interpretations, which became effective as of January 1, 2015, did not have a material impact on our financial 

statements.  

3. Significant Accounting Policies  

The Company has consistently applied the following accounting policies to all periods presented in these 

consolidated financial statements. 

(a) Basis of consolidation 

(i) Subsidiaries 

Subsidiaries are entities controlled by the Group. The Group controls an entity when it is exposed to, or has 

rights to, variable returns from its involvement with the entity and has the ability to affect those returns 

through its power over the entity. The financial statements of subsidiaries are included in the consolidated 

financial statements from the date on which control commences until the date on which control ceases. 

(ii) Loss of control 

When the Group loses control over a subsidiary, it derecognises the assets and liabilities of the subsidiary, 

and any non-controlling interests and other components of equity. Any resulting gain or loss is recognised in 

profit or loss. Any interest retained in the former subsidiary is measured at fair value when control is lost.  

(iii) Transactions eliminated on consolidation 

Intra-group balances and transactions, and any unrealised income and expenses arising from intra-group 

transactions, are eliminated. Unrealised gains arising from transactions with equity-accounted investees are 

 
 
PAGE 34 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Financial Statements 2015 

eliminated against the investment to the extent of the Group’s interest in the investee. Unrealised losses are 

eliminated in the same way as unrealised gains, but only to the extent that there is no evidence of 

impairment. 

(b) Classes of financial instruments  

Financial instruments are both primary financial instruments, such as receivables and payables, and financial 

derivatives. For primary financial instruments, reference is made to the treatment per the corresponding 

balance sheet item.  

Financial derivatives are valued at fair value. Upon first recognition, financial derivatives are recognized at fair 

value and then revalued as at balance sheet date.  

(c) Foreign currencies  

(i) Foreign currency transactions 

Foreign currency transactions are translated into the functional currency using the exchange rates prevailing 

at the dates of the transactions.  

Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into the functional currency 

at the exchange rate at the reporting date. Non-monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign 

currencies that are measured at fair value are translated into the functional currency at the exchange rate 

when the fair value was determined. Foreign currency differences are generally recognized in profit or loss. 

Non-monetary items that are measured based on historical cost in a foreign currency are not translated. 

(ii) Foreign operations 

The assets and liabilities of foreign operations are translated into euro at exchange rates at the reporting 

date. The income and expenses of foreign operations are translated into euros at the exchange rates at the 

dates of the transactions. Foreign currency differences are recognized in OCI and accumulated in the 

translation reserve, except to the extent that the translation difference is allocated to NCI. 

(d) Recognition of other income  

Other income includes amounts earned from third parties and are recognized when earned in accordance 

with the substance and under the terms of the related agreements and when it is probable that the economic 

benefits associated with the transaction will flow to the entity and the amount of the income can be 

measured reliably. The grants are recognized in other income in the same period in which the related R&D 

costs are recognized. 

(e) Government grants—WBSO  

The WBSO (“afdrachtvermindering speur- en ontwikkelingswerk”) is a Dutch fiscal facility that provides 

subsidies to companies, knowledge centers and self-employed people who perform research and 

development activities (as defined in the WBSO Act). Under this Act, a contribution is paid towards the labor 

costs of employees directly involved in research and development. The contribution is in the form of a 

reduction of payroll taxes and social security contributions. Subsidies relating to labor costs are deferred and 

recognized in the income statement as negative labor costs over the period necessary to match them with 

the labor costs that they are intended to compensate.  

(f) Employee benefits  

(i) Short-term employee benefits 

Short-term employee benefits are expensed as the related service is provided. A liability is recognized for the 

amount expected to be paid if the Group has a present legal or constructive obligation to pay this amount as 

a result of past service provided by the employee and the obligation can be estimated reliably. 

 
 
PAGE 35 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Financial Statements 2015 

(ii) Share-based payment transactions  

The grant-date fair value of equity-settled share-based payment awards granted to employees is generally 

recognized as an expense, with a corresponding increase in equity, over the vesting period of the awards. The 

amount recognized as an expense is adjusted to reflect the number of awards for which the related service 

and non-market performance conditions are expected to be met, such that the amount ultimately recognized 

is based on the number of awards that meet the related service and non-market performance conditions at 

the vesting date. For share-based payment awards with non-vesting conditions, the grant-date fair value of 

the share-based payment is measured to reflect such conditions and there is no true-up for differences 

between expected and actual outcomes. 

(iii) Pension obligations  

The Company operates defined contribution pension plans for all employees funded through payments to 

insurance companies. The Company has no legal or constructive obligation to pay further contributions once 

the contributions have been paid. The contributions are recognized as employee benefit expense when they 

are due. Prepaid contributions are recognized as an asset to the extent that a cash refund or a reduction in 

the future payments is available.  

(g) Taxation  

Income tax expense represents the sum of the tax currently payable and deferred tax. It is recognized in 

profit or loss except to the extent that it relates to a business combination, or items recognized directly in 

equity or in OCI. 

(i) Current tax  

The tax currently payable is based on taxable profit for the year. Taxable profit differs from profit as reported 

in the income statement because of items of income or expense that are taxable or deductible in other years 

and items that are never taxable or deductible. The Company’s liability for current tax is calculated using tax 

rates that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the end of the reporting period. 

(ii) Deferred tax  

Deferred tax is recognized on differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities in the 

financial statements and the corresponding tax bases used in the computation of taxable profit.  

The carrying amount of deferred tax assets is reviewed at the end of each reporting period and reduced to 

the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profits will be available to allow all or part of the 

asset to be recovered. Since the Company does not expect to be profitable in the foreseeable future, its 

deferred tax assets are valued at nil.  

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply in the period in 

which the liability is settled or the asset realized, based on tax rates (and tax laws) that have been enacted or 

substantively enacted by the end of the reporting period. The measurement of deferred tax liabilities and 

assets reflects the tax consequences that would follow from the manner in which the Company expects, at 

the end of the reporting period, to recover or settle the carrying amount of its assets and liabilities.  

(h) Intangible assets  

(i) Licenses  

Acquired patents have a finite useful life and are carried at cost less accumulated amortization and 

impairment losses. Amortization is calculated using the straight-line method to allocate the cost of patents 

over their estimated useful lives (generally 10 years unless a patent expires prior to that date). Amortization 

begins when an asset is available for its intended use.  

 
 
PAGE 36 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Financial Statements 2015 

(ii) Research and development  

Research expenditures are recognized as expenses as incurred. Costs incurred on development projects are 

recognized as intangible assets of the date that it can be established that it is probable that future economic 

benefits that are attributable to the asset will flow to the Company considering its commercial and 

technological feasibility, generally when filed for regulatory approval for commercial production, and when 

costs can be measured reliably. Given the current stage of the development of the Company’s products no 

development expenditures have yet been capitalized.  

Registration costs for patents are part of the expenditures for the research and development project. 

Therefore, registration costs for patents are expensed as incurred as long as the research and development 

project concerned does not yet meet the criteria for capitalization.  

(iii) Other intangible assets 

Other intangible assets, including software, that are acquired by the Company and have finite useful lives are 

measured at cost less accumulated amortization and accumulated impairment losses. 

(iv) Amortization 

Amortization is calculated to write off the cost of intangible assets less their estimated residual values using 

the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives, and is recognized in profit or loss.  

The estimated useful lives for current and comparative periods are as follows: 

 

Software:  

3 years. 

Amortization methods, useful lives and residual values are reviewed at each reporting date and adjusted if 

appropriate. 

(i) Property, plant and equipment 

(i) Recognition and measurement 

Items of property, plant and equipment are measured at cost less accumulated depreciation and any 

accumulated impairment losses. If significant parts of an item of property, plant and equipment have 

different useful lives, then they are accounted for as separate items (major components) of property, plant 

and equipment. Any gain or loss on disposal of an item of property, plant and equipment is recognized in 

profit or loss. 

(ii) Depreciation 

Depreciation is calculated to write off the cost of items of property, plant and equipment less their estimated 

residual values using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives, and is recognized in profit or 

loss. Leased assets are depreciated over the shorter of the lease term and their useful lives unless it is 

reasonably certain that the Company will obtain ownership by the end of the lease term.  

The estimated useful lives of property, plant and equipment for current and comparative periods are as 

follows: 

 

 

Leasehold improvements:    

5 - 10 years. 

Laboratory equipment:  

5 years. 

  Other:  

3 - 5 years. 

Depreciation methods, useful lives and residual values are reviewed at each reporting date and adjusted if 

appropriate. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PAGE 37 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Financial Statements 2015 

(j) Impairment of tangible and intangible assets  

At the end of each reporting period, the Company reviews the carrying amounts of its tangible and intangible 

assets to determine whether there is any indication that those assets have suffered an impairment loss. If 

any such indication exists, the recoverable amount of the asset is estimated in order to determine the extent 

of the impairment loss (if any). Where it is not possible to estimate the recoverable amount of an individual 

asset, the Company estimates the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit to which the asset 

belongs. Where a reasonable and consistent basis of allocation can be identified, corporate assets are also 

allocated to individual cash-generating units, or otherwise they are allocated to the smallest group of cash-

generating units for which a reasonable and consistent allocation basis can be identified.  

Intangible assets with indefinite useful lives and intangible assets not yet available for use are tested for 

impairment at least annually, and whenever there is an indication that the asset may be impaired.  

The recoverable amount is the higher of fair value less costs to sell and value in use. In assessing value in use, 

the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that 

reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset for which 

the estimates of future cash flows have not been adjusted.  

 If the recoverable amount of an asset (or cash-generating unit) is estimated to be less than its carrying 

amount, the carrying amount of the asset (or cash-generating unit) is reduced to its recoverable amount. An 

impairment loss is recognized immediately in profit or loss, unless the relevant asset is carried at a revalued 

amount, in which case the impairment loss is treated as a revaluation decrease.  

Where an impairment loss subsequently reverses, the carrying amount of the asset (or cash-generating unit) 

is increased to the revised estimate of its recoverable amount, but so that the increased carrying amount 

does not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined had no impairment loss been 

recognized for the asset (or cash-generating unit) in prior years. A reversal of an impairment loss is 

recognized immediately in profit or loss, unless the relevant asset is carried at a revalued amount, in which 

case the reversal of the impairment loss is treated as a revaluation increase.  

(k) Financial assets  

All financial assets are recognized and derecognized on the trade date where the purchase or sale of a 

financial asset is under a contract whose terms require delivery of the financial asset within the timeframe 

established by the market concerned, and are initially measured at fair value, plus transaction costs, except 

for those financial assets classified as at fair value through profit or loss, which are initially measured at fair 

value.  

(i) Loans and receivables  

Trade receivables, loans and other receivables that have fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted 

in an active market are classified as “loans and receivables”. Loans and receivables are measured at 

amortized cost using the effective interest method, less any impairment.  

An allowance for doubtful accounts is established when there is objective evidence that the Company will not 

be able to collect all amounts due according to the original terms of receivables. Significant financial 

difficulties of the debtor, probability that the debtor will enter into bankruptcy or financial reorganization, and 

default or delinquency in payments are considered indicators that the trade receivable is impaired. Loans 

and receivables are included in ‘current assets’, except for maturities greater than 12 months after the 

balance sheet date, which are classified as ‘non-current assets’.  

For all financial assets, the fair value approximates its carrying value.  

 
 
PAGE 38 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Financial Statements 2015 

(l) Cash and cash equivalents  

Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand and all highly liquid investments with original maturities of 

three months or less that are convertible to a known amount of cash and bear an insignificant risk of change 

in value.  

(m) Financial liabilities and equity instruments  

Debt and equity instruments are classified as either financial liabilities or as equity in accordance with the 

substance of the contractual arrangement.  

(i) Equity instruments  

An equity instrument is any contract that evidences a residual interest in the assets of an entity after 

deducting all of its liabilities. Equity instruments issued by the Company are recognized at the proceeds 

received, net of direct issue costs.  

(ii) Other financial liabilities  

Other financial liabilities, including borrowings, are initially measured at fair value, net of transaction costs 

incurred, and are subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method, with interest 

expense recognized on an effective yield basis.  

The effective interest method is a method of calculating the amortized cost of a financial liability and of 

allocating interest expense over the relevant period. The effective interest rate is the rate that exactly 

discounts estimated future cash payments through the expected life of the financial liability, or, where 

appropriate, a shorter period.  

Borrowings and other financial liabilities are classified as ‘non-current liabilities,’ other than liabilities with 

maturities up to one year, which are classified as “current liabilities”.  

The Company derecognizes financial liabilities when the liability is discharged, cancelled or expired. For all 

financial liabilities, the fair value approximates its carrying amount.  

(n) Leases 

(i) Determining whether an arrangement contains a lease 

At inception of an arrangement, the Company determines whether such an arrangement is or contains a 

lease. 

At inception or on reassessment of an arrangement that contains a lease, the Company separates payments 

and other consideration required by such an arrangement into those for the lease and those for other 

elements on the basis of their relative fair values. If the Company concludes for a finance lease that it is 

impracticable to separate the payments reliably, then an asset and a liability are recognized at an amount 

equal to the fair value of the underlying asset. Subsequently, the liability is reduced as payments are made 

and an imputed finance cost on the liability is recognized using the Company’s incremental borrowing rate. 

(ii) Leased assets 

Assets held by the Company under leases that transfer to the Company substantially all of the risks and 

rewards of ownership are classified as finance leases. The leased assets are measured initially at an amount 

equal to the lower of their fair value and the present value of the minimum lease payments. Subsequent to 

initial recognition, the assets are accounted for in accordance with the accounting policy applicable to that 

asset.  

 
 
PAGE 39 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Financial Statements 2015 

Assets held under other leases are classified as operating leases and are not recognized in the Company’s 

statement of financial position. 

(iii) Lease payments 

Payments made under operating leases are recognized in profit or loss on a straight-line basis over the term 

of the lease. Lease incentives received are recognized as an integral part of the total lease expense, over the 

term of the lease. 

Minimum lease payments made under finance leases are apportioned between the finance expense and the 

reduction of the outstanding liability. The finance expense is allocated to each period during the lease term 

so as to produce a constant periodic rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability. 

4. New standards and interpretations not yet adopted 

A number of new standards, amendments to standards and interpretations are effective for annual periods 

beginning after 1 January 2016, and have not been applied in preparing these consolidated financial 

statements. Those which may be relevant to the Group are set out below. The Group does not plan to adopt 

these standards early. 

IFRS 9 Financial Instruments 

IFRS 9, published in July 2014, replaces the existing guidance in IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and 

Measurement. IFRS 9 includes revised guidance on the classification and measurement of financial 

instruments, including a new expected credit loss model for calculating impairment on financial assets, and 

the new general hedge accounting requirements. It also carries forward the guidance on recognition and 

derecognition of financial instruments from IAS 39. 

IFRS 9 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2018, with early adoption 

permitted. 

IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers 

IFRS 15 establishes a comprehensive framework for determining whether, how much and when revenue is 

recognised. It replaces existing revenue recognition guidance, including IAS 18 Revenue, IAS 11 Construction 

Contracts and IFRIC 13 Customer Loyalty Programmes. 

IFRS 15 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2018, with early adoption 

permitted. 

IFRS 16 Leases 

IFRS 16 specifies how a company will recognise, measure, present and disclose leases. The standard provides 

a single lessee accounting model, requiring lessees to recognise assets and liabilities for all leases unless the 

lease term is 12 months or less or the underlying asset has a low value. Lessors continue to classify leases as 

operating or finance, with IFRS 16’s approach to lessor accounting substantially unchanged from its 

predecessor, IAS 17. 

IFRS 16 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2019, with early adoption 

permitted. 

The adoption of these Standards and Interpretations are not expected to have a material effect on the 

financial statements.  

 
 
PAGE 40 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Financial Statements 2015 

5. Financial Risk Management  

5.1. Financial risk factors 

The Company’s activities expose it to a variety of financial risks: market risk (including currency risk, interest 

rate risk and price risk), credit risk and liquidity risk. The Company’s overall financial risk management seeks 

to minimize potential adverse effects resulting from unpredictability of financial markets on the Company’s 

financial performance.  

Financial risk management is carried out by the finance department. The finance department identifies and 

evaluates financial risks and proposes mitigating actions if deemed appropriate.  

(a) Market risk  

Market risk is the risk that changes in market prices – such as foreign exchange rates, interest rates and 

equity prices – will affect the Company’s income or the value of its holdings of financial instruments. The 

objective of market risk management is to manage and control market risk exposures within acceptable 

parameters, while optimizing the return. 

Foreign exchange risk 

Foreign exchange risk arises from future commercial transactions and recognized assets and liabilities in 

foreign currencies, primarily with respect to the U.S. Dollar. The Company has an exposure associated with 

the time delay between entering into a contract, budget or forecast and the realization thereof. The Company 

operates a foreign exchange policy to manage the foreign exchange risk against the functional currency 

based on the Company’s cash balances and the projected future spend per major currency. 

At December 31, 2015 there was a net liability in U.S. Dollars of € 1.1 million (2014: € 0.7 million). Foreign 

currency denominated receivables and trade payables are short term in nature (generally 30 to 45 days). As a 

result foreign exchange rate movements on receivables and trade payables, during the years presented had 

an immaterial effect on the financial statements.  

At year-end, a substantial amount of our cash balances are denominated in U.S. Dollars. This amount reflects 

our current expectation of future expenditure in U.S. dollars. 

A reasonably possible strengthening (weakening) of the U.S. Dollar by 10% against all other currencies at 

December 31 would have affected the measurement of our cash balances denominated in a U.S. Dollar and 

affected equity and profit or loss by € 5.2 million (2014: € 4.3 million). The analysis assumes that all other 

variables, in particular interest rates, remain constant. 

Price risk 

The market prices for the production of preclinical and clinical materials and services as well as external 

contracted research may vary over time. Currently, the commercial prices of any of the Company’s product 

candidates is uncertain. When the development products near the regulatory approval date or potential 

regulatory approval date, the uncertainty of the potential sales price decreases. The Company is not exposed 

to commodity price risk.  

Furthermore the Company does not hold investments classified as available-for-sale or at fair value through 

profit or loss, therefore are not exposed to equity securities price risk.  

 
 
PAGE 41 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Financial Statements 2015 

Cash flow and fair value Interest rate risk  

The Company’s exposure to interest rate risks is limited due to the use of loans with fixed rates. The 

Company has one loan and a financial lease with a fixed interest, totaling € 4,839,000 at December 31, 2015 

(2014: € 2,863,000). Details on the interest rates and maturities of these loans are provided in Note 13.  

(b) Credit risk  

Credit risk represents the risk of financial loss caused by default of the counterparty. The Company has no 

large receivables balances with external parties. The Company’s principal financial assets are cash and cash 

equivalents which are placed at ABN Amro and Rabobank. Our cash management policy is focused on 

preserving capital, providing liquidity for operations and optimizing yield while accepting limited risk (Short-

term credit ratings must be rated  A-1/P-1/F1 at a minimum by at least one of the Nationally Recognized 

Statistical Rating Organizations (NRSROs) specifically Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s or Fitch. Long-term credit 

rating must be rated A- or A3 at a minimum by at least one NRSRO). 

As of December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, substantially all of our cash and cash equivalents were 

placed at two large institutions, Rabobank and ABN Amro. Both institutions are highly rated (ratings of Aa2 

and A2 respectively) with sufficient capital adequacy and liquidity metrics. 

There are no financial assets past due date or impaired. No credit limits were exceeded during the reporting 

period. 

(c) Liquidity risk  

Liquidity risk represents the risk that an entity will encounter difficulty in meeting obligations associated with 

its financial liabilities. Prudent liquidity risk management implies ensuring sufficient availability of cash 

resources for funding of operations and planning to raise cash if and when needed, either through issue of 

shares or through credit facilities. Management monitors rolling forecasts of the Company’s liquidity reserve 

on the basis of expected cash flow.  

The table below analyzes ProQR’s undiscounted liabilities into relevant maturity groupings based on the 

remaining period at year-end until the contractual maturity date:  

dsssds  

At December 31, 2015 

Borrowings  

Finance lease liabilities   

Trade payables and other payables   

At December 31, 2014 

Borrowings  

Finance lease liabilities   

Trade payables and other payables   

Less than  
1 year 

Between  
1 and 2 years 

Between  
2 and 5 years 

€ 1,000 

€ 1,000 

€ 1,000 

Over 
5 years 

€ 1,000 

-- 

15 

5,471 

5,486 

-- 

34 

2,980 

3,014 

1,691 

4,712 

-- 

-- 

-- 

-- 

1,691 

4,712 

-- 

15 

-- 

15 

3,884 

-- 

-- 

3,884 

-- 

-- 

-- 

-- 

-- 

-- 

-- 

-- 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PAGE 42 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Financial Statements 2015 

5.2. Capital risk management 

The Company's objectives when managing capital are to safeguard the Company's ability to continue as a 

going concern in order to provide returns for shareholders, benefits for other stakeholders and to maintain 

an optimal capital structure to reduce the cost of capital. 

In order to maintain or adjust the capital structure, the Company may adjust the amount of dividends paid to 

shareholders (although at this time the Company does not have retained earnings and is therefore currently 

unable to pay dividends), return capital to shareholders, issue new shares or sell assets to reduce debt. 

The total amount of equity as recorded on the balance sheet is managed as capital by the Company. 

5.3. Fair value measurement 

For financial instruments that are measured on the balance sheet at fair value, IFRS 13 requires disclosure of 

fair value measurements by level of the following fair value measurement hierarchy: 

  Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1); 

 

 

Inputs other than quoted prices included within level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either 

directly (that is, as prices) or indirectly (that is, derived from prices) (level 2); and 

Inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (that is, unobservable 

inputs) (level 3). 

The Company has no assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value at December 31, 2015 and 2014. 

The carrying amount of all financial assets and financial liabilities is a reasonable approximation of the fair 

value and therefore information about the fair values of each class has not been disclosed.  

6. Segment Information  

The Company operates in one reportable segment, which comprises the discovery and development of 

innovative, RNA based therapeutics. The management board is identified as the chief operating decision 

maker. The management board reviews the operating results regularly to make decisions about resources 

and to assess overall performance.  

The Company has not generated any sales revenues since inception.  

All non-current assets of the Company are located in the Netherlands. The amounts provided to the 

management board with respect to total assets and liabilities are measured in a manner consistent with that 

of the financial statements. 

 
 
 
 
7. Intangible Assets  

dsssds  

Balance at January 1, 2014 

Cost   

Accumulated amortization 

Carrying amount 

Additions 

Movement for the period 

Balance at December 31, 2014 

Cost   

Accumulated amortization 

Carrying amount 

Additions 

Amortization 

Movement for the period 

Balance at December 31, 2015 

Cost   

Accumulated amortization 

Carrying amount 

PAGE 43 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Financial Statements 2015 

Licenses 

Software 

€ 1,000 

€ 1,000 

Total 

€ 1,000 

39 

-- 

39 

-- 

-- 

39 

-- 

39 

-- 

-- 

-- 

39 

-- 

39 

-- 

-- 

-- 

124 

124 

124 

-- 

124 

28 

(50) 

(22) 

152 

(50) 

102 

-- 

-- 

39 

124 

124 

163 

-- 

163 

28 

(50) 

(22) 

191 

(50) 

141 

In 2012, the Company acquired an exclusive license from the Massachusetts General Hospital. The initial 

payment in respect of the license, in the amount of € 39,000, will be amortized over the commercial life of 

products based on the license during the patent-life.  

There were no amortization charges in 2014. The amortization charge for 2015 is included in the general and 

administrative costs for an amount of € 50,000.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PAGE 44 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Financial Statements 2015 

8. Property, Plant and Equipment (‘PP&E’) 

dsssds  

Balance at January 1, 2014 

Cost   

Accumulated depreciation 

Carrying amount 

Additions 

Depreciation 

Disposals 

Movement for the period 

Balance at December 31, 2014 

Cost   

Accumulated depreciation 

Carrying amount 

Additions 

Depreciation 

Disposals 

Movement for the period 

Balance at December 31, 2015 

Cost   

Accumulated depreciation 

Carrying amount 

Leasehold 
 improvements 

Laboratory 
 equipment 

Other 

Total 

€ 1,000 

€ 1,000 

€ 1,000 

€ 1,000 

5 

(1) 

4 

321 

(16) 

-- 

305 

326 

(17) 

309 

659 

(77) 

-- 

582 

985 

(94) 

891 

190 

(19) 

171 

579 

(85) 

-- 

494 

769 

(104) 

665 

367 

(201) 

-- 

166 

1,136 

(305) 

831 

33 

(4) 

29 

209 

(25) 

-- 

184 

242 

(29) 

213 

415 

(145) 

(6) 

264 

651 

(174) 

477 

228 

(24) 

204 

1,109 

(126) 

-- 

983 

1,337 

(150) 

1,187 

1,441 

(423) 

(6) 

1,012 

2,772 

(573) 

2,199 

The depreciation charge is included in the research and development costs for an amount of € 361,000 (2014: 

€ 119,000) and in the general and administrative costs for an amount of € 62,000 (2014: € 7,000).  

9. Social Security and Other Taxes 

dsssds  

Value added tax 

Wage tax 

December 31, 
2015 

December 31, 
2014 

€ 1,000 

€ 1,000 

953 

3 

956 

426 

-- 

426 

All receivables are considered short-term and due within one year.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PAGE 45 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Financial Statements 2015 

10. Prepayments and Other Receivables  

dsssds  

Prepayments 

Other receivables 

All receivables are considered short-term and due within one year.  

11. Cash and Cash Equivalents  

dsssds  

Cash at banks 

Bank deposits 

December 31, 
2015 

December 31, 
2014 

€ 1,000 

€ 1,000 

1,401 

547 

1,948 

408 

327 

735 

December 31, 
2015 

December 31, 
2014 

€ 1,000 

€ 1,000 

94,865 

-- 

94,865 

83,084 

29,652 

112,736 

The cash at banks is at full disposal of the Company. Bank deposits are convertible into cash upon request of 

the Company. 

12. Shareholders’ Equity  

(a) Share capital  

dsssds  

Number of shares 2015 

Number of shares 2014 

Ordinary 

Preferred 

Ordinary 

Preferred 

In issue at January 1 

Issued for cash 

Conversion of preferred shares 

Exercise of share options 

Treasury shares issued 

23,338,154 

-- 

-- 

7,811 

-- 

In issue at December 31 – fully paid 

23,345,965 

-- 

-- 

-- 

-- 

-- 

-- 

6,108,152 

9,490,336 

8,265,179 

-- 

(525,513) 

23,338,154 

-- 

8,265,179 

(8,265,179) 

-- 

-- 

-- 

The authorized share capital of the Company amounting to € 934,000 consists of 23,345,965 ordinary shares 

with a par value of € 0.04 per share. All issued shares have been fully paid in cash. 

On April 17, 2014, the Company authorized and issued a total of 8,265,179 preferred shares, of which 619,682 

preferred shares were issued as a result of the conversion of the outstanding convertible loan. In addition, on 

the same date, 444,884 ordinary shares were issued to the Foundation “Stichting ProQR Therapeutics 

Participation”. The gross proceeds from this share issuance (excluding the shares issued to the Foundation) 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PAGE 46 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Financial Statements 2015 

amounted to € 41,998,000 while the transaction costs amounted to € 1,632,000, resulting in net proceeds of € 

40,366,000. The net proceeds received in cash amounted to € 37,806,000, while non-cash proceeds as a result 

of the conversion of the convertible loan amounted to € 2,560,000. 

On September 15, 2014, the general meeting of shareholders of the Company resolved to approve and effect 

a capital reorganization, including a share split and bonus share issuance. The combined effect of the share 

split and bonus share issuance was a 101.804232-for-1 share split of the outstanding ordinary and preferred 

shares held by the Company’s shareholders. This share split became effective on September 15, 2014. 

On September 18, 2014, the Company was listed at the NASDAQ Global Market under ticker symbol PRQR. In 

connection with this listing, the Company issued a total of 8,625,000 ordinary shares against the initial public 

offering price of $ 13.00, resulting in gross proceeds of $ 112,125,000 (€ 87,202,000). The number of shares 

issued includes the exercise of the overallotment option granted to the underwriters. The net proceeds 

raised in the offering amounted to € 80,376,000, net of € 8,589,000 of underwriting discounts and offering 

expenses, of which € 6,826,000 was processed through share premium and € 1,763,000 was included in the 

statement of comprehensive income as general and administrative costs.  

All of the issued preferred shares were converted into the Company’s ordinary shares. The conversion rate 

for the preferred shares was one-to-one, adjusted for the stock splits.  

(b) Treasury shares  

All treasury shares presented in the statement of changes in equity relate to ordinary shares that have legally 

been issued, but that are within control of the Company. At 31 December 2015, the Company held 1,174,849 

of the Company’s shares (2014: 1,182,660). 

(c) Equity settled employee benefit reserve  

The costs of share options for employees, members of the supervisory board and members of the 

management board are recognized in the income statement, together with a corresponding increase in 

equity during the vesting period, taking into account (deferral of) corporate income taxes. The accumulated 

expense of share options recognized in the income statement is shown separately in the equity category 

‘equity settled employee benefit reserve’ in the ‘statement of changes in equity’.  

(d) Translation reserve 

The translation reserve comprises all foreign currency differences arising from the translation of the financial 

statements of foreign operations.  

(e) Share options  

The Company operates an equity-settled share-based compensation plan which was introduced in 2013. 

Options may be granted to employees, members of the supervisory board, members of the management 

board and consultants. The compensation expenses included in operating costs for this plan were € 

1,212,000 in 2015 (2014: € 646,000), of which € 801,000 (2014: € 404,000) was recorded in general and 

administrative costs and € 411,000 (2014: € 242,000) was recorded in research and development costs.  

Options granted under this stock option plan are exercisable once vested. Any vesting schedule may be 

attached to the granted options, however the typical vesting period is four years (25% after every year). The 

options expire ten years after date of grant. Options granted under the stock option plan are granted at 

exercise prices which equal the fair value of the ordinary shares of the Company at the date of the grant.  

 
 
The Company accounts for its employee stock options under the fair value method. The fair value of the 

options is estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, with on average the 

PAGE 47 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Financial Statements 2015 

following assumptions:  

dsssds  

Risk-free interest rate 

Expected dividend yield 

Expected volatility 

Expected life in years 

Options  
granted in 2015 

Options  
granted in 2014 

1.497% 

0% 

86.8% 

5 years 

0.616% 

0% 

88.6% 

5 years 

The resulting weighted average grant date fair value of the options amounted to € 10.35 in 2015 (2014:  

€ 2.58). The stock options granted have a 10 year life following the grant date and are assumed to be 

exercised five years from date of grant for all awards. 

Movements in the number of options outstanding and their related weighted average exercise prices are as 

follows:  

dsssds  

Balance at January 1 

Granted 

Forfeited 

Exercised 

Lapsed 

Balance at December 31 

Exercisable 

2015 

2014 

Number of 
 options 

Average 
 exercise price 

Number of 
 options 

Average  
exercise price 

998,765 

125,798 

(7,817) 

(7,811) 

-- 

1,108,935 

339,352 

€ 2.78 

€ 15.27 

€ 4.64 

€ 1.78 

-- 

€ 4.19 

379,323 

691,722 

(11,095) 

(61,185) 

-- 

998,765 

94,729 

€ 1.11 

€ 3.52 

€ 1.20 

€ 1.11 

-- 

€ 2.78 

The options outstanding at December 31, 2015 had an exercise price in the range of € 1.11 to € 20.34 (2014: € 

1.11 to € 12.15) and a weighted-average contractual life of 8.3 years (2014: 9.2 years). 

The weighted-average share price at the date of exercise for share options exercised in 2015 was € 19.30 

(2014: € 3.04). 

Please refer to Note 23 for the options granted to key management personnel. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PAGE 48 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Financial Statements 2015 

13. Non-current liabilities  

(a) Borrowings  

dsssds  

Innovation credit 

Accrued interest on innovation credit 

Innovation credit (“Innovatiekrediet”)  

December 31, 
2015 

December 31, 
2014 

€ 1,000 

€ 1,000 

4,228 

596 

4,824 

2,588 

226 

2,814 

On June 1, 2012, ProQR was awarded an Innovation credit by the Dutch government, through its agency RVO 

(previously: “AgentschapNL”) of the Ministry of Economic Affairs, for the Company’s cystic fibrosis program. 

Amounts were drawn under this facility in the course of 2013, 2014 and 2015. The credit covers 35% of the 

costs incurred in respect of the program up to an initial maximum of € 5.0 million through December 31, 

2016.  

The credit is interest-bearing at a rate of 10% per annum. The credit, including accrued interest, is repayable 

in three instalments on August 31, 2017, August 31, 2018 and August 31, 2019, depending on the technical 

success of the program.  

The assets which are co-financed with the granted innovation credit are subject to a right of pledge for the 

benefit of RVO. 

(b) Finance lease liabilities  

dsssds  

Balance at January 1 

Initial recognition new finance leases  

Interest expense accrued 

Payment of finance lease liabilities 

Balance at December 31 

Current portion at December 31 

2015 

€ 1,000 

2014 

€ 1,000 

49 

-- 

-- 

(34) 

15 

15 

-- 

83 

-- 

-- 

(34) 

49 

(34) 

15 

Certain of the Company’s property, plant and equipment items are subject to finance leases. These leases 

relate to laboratory equipment. The net carrying amount of leased assets amounts to € 48,000 (2014: € 

64,000). 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PAGE 49 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Financial Statements 2015 

Future minimum lease payments under finance leases as at December 31, 2015 are as follows:  

dsssds  

2015 

2014 

Minimum 
payments 

Present value  
of payments 

Minimum 
payments 

Present value  
of payments 

Less than 1 year 

Between 1 and 5 years 

More than 5 years 

15 

-- 

-- 

15 

-- 

-- 

34 

15 

-- 

34 

15 

-- 

The interest used for the present value of payments is 2%.  

14. Current Liabilities  

dsssds  

Current portion finance lease liabilities 

Trade payables 

Social securities and other taxes 

Pension premiums 

Deferred income 

Accrued expenses and other liabilities 

December 31, 
2015 

December 31, 
2014 

€ 1,000 

€ 1,000 

15 

885 

235 

16 

144 

4,191 

5,486 

34 

1,247 

341 

127 

-- 

1,265 

3,014 

At December 31, 2015, current liabilities includes deferred income resulting from receipt of the first 

installment of the € 6 million grant from the European Commission (EC) under the Horizon 2020 program to 

finance the clinical development of QR-010. 

The majority of the Company’s current liabilities are denominated in euros.  

15. Other income  

dsssds  

Grant income 

Rental income from property subleases 

2015 

€ 1,000 

3,188 

47 

3,235 

2014 

€ 1,000 

313 

-- 

313 

In August 2014, the Company entered into an agreement with Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Therapeutics, Inc., 

or CFFT, a subsidiary of the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, pursuant to which CFFT agreed to provide the 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PAGE 50  / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Financial Statements 2015 

Company with up to $ 3 million to support the clinical development of QR-010. The grant is recognized in 

other income in the same period in which the related R&D costs are recognized. 

In 2015, the European Commission (EC) through its Horizon 2020 program awarded ProQR and its academic 

partners a grant of € 6 million (ProQR: € 4.4 million) to support the clinical development of QR-010 in the 

period up till December 31, 2017. Horizon 2020 is one of the largest research and innovation programs in the 

European Union with nearly € 80 billion in available funding for qualified projects from 2014 to 2020.  

Both grants are recognized in other income in the same period in which the related R&D costs are 

recognized. 

16. Research and Development Costs  

Research and development costs amounted to € 23,401,000 in 2015 (2014: € 10,267,000) and comprise 

allocated employee costs, the costs of materials and laboratory consumables, the costs of external studies 

including, amongst others, clinical studies and toxicology studies and external research, license- and IP-costs 

and allocated other costs.  

17. Employee Benefits  

dsssds  

Wages and salaries 

Social security costs 

Pension costs – defined contribution plans 

Equity-settled share based payments 

2015 

€ 1,000 

7,128 

596 

478 

1,212 

9,414 

2014 

€ 1,000 

3,845 

320 

217 

646 

5,028 

Average number of employees for the period 

86.1 

37.8 

Employees per activity at December 31 (converted to FTE): 

dsssds  

Research and Development 

General and Administrative 

December 31, 
2015 

December 31, 
2014 

72.4 

27.1 

99.5 

40.1 

18.7 

58.8 

Of all employees 94.5 FTE are employed in the Netherlands (2014: 54.8 FTE). 

Included in the wages and salaries for 2015 is a credit of € 372,000 (2014: € 301,000) with respect to WBSO 

subsidies.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
18. Financial Income and Expense  

dsssds  

Interest income 

Current accounts and deposits 

Interest costs 

Interest on loans and borrowings 

Foreign exchange result 

Net foreign exchange benefit/(loss) 

19. Income Taxes  

The calculation of the tax charge is as follows:  

dsssds  

PAGE 51 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Financial Statements 2015 

2015 

€ 1,000 

2014 

€ 1,000 

501 

183 

(395) 

(265) 

6,065 

4,416 

6,171 

4,334 

2015 

€ 1,000 

2014 

€ 1,000 

Income tax provision based on domestic rate (25%) 

5,208 

3,032 

Tax effect of: 

Non-deductible expenses 

Tax incentives 

Current year losses for which no deferred tax asset was recognized 

Income tax charge 

Effective tax rate 

(309) 

136 

(5,035) 

-- 

0% 

(207) 

2,065 

(4,890) 

-- 

0% 

Due to the operating losses incurred since inception the Company has no tax provisions as of the balance 

sheet date. Furthermore, no significant temporary differences exist between accounting and tax results.  

Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent on future earnings, if any, the timing and amount of which are 

uncertain. Accordingly, the Company has not yet recognized any deferred tax asset related to operating 

losses. As per December 31, 2015, the Company has a total amount of € 46.9 million (2014: € 26.8 million) tax 

loss carry-forwards available for offset against future taxable profits. According to current tax regulations the 

first amount of the tax loss carry-forwards will expire in 2021.  

20. Earnings Per Share  

(a) Basic and diluted earnings per share  

Basic earnings per share are calculated by dividing the result attributable to equity holders of the Company 

by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the year.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PAGE 52 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Financial Statements 2015 

dsssds  

Result attributable to equity holders of the Company (€ 1,000) 

Weighted average number of shares  

Basic (and diluted) earnings per share (€ per share) 

2015 

2014 

(20,832) 

(12,127) 

23,343,262 

11,082,801 

€ (0.89) 

€ (1.09) 

(b) Diluted earnings per share  

For the periods included in these financial statements, the share options are not included in the diluted 

earnings per share calculation as the Company was loss-making in all periods. Due to the anti-dilutive nature 

of the outstanding options, basic and diluted earnings per share are equal.  

(c) Dividends per share  

The Company did not declare dividends for any of the years presented in these financial statements.  

21. Operational Leases  

Since 2012, the Company is domiciled in Leiden. It currently has concluded rental agreements for laboratory 

space and offices at two locations and one office in the US.  

The lease expenditure charged to the income statement in 2015 amounts to € 703,000 (2014: € 258,000). The 

future aggregate minimum lease payments under non-cancellable operating leases are as follows: 

dsssds  

Less than 1 year 

Between 1 and 5 years 

More than 5 years 

December 31, 
2015 

December 31, 
2014 

€ 1,000 

€ 1,000 

1,837 

7,212 

-- 

9,049 

509 

277 

-- 

786 

The Company leases out a part of its offices in the US. In 2015, total sublease income amounted to € 47,000 

(2014: nil). At 31 December, the future minimum lease payments under non-cancellable leases are receivable 

as follows: 

dsssds  

Less than 1 year 

Between 1 and 5 years 

More than 5 years 

December 31, 
2015 

December 31, 
2014 

€ 1,000 

185 

-- 

-- 

185 

€ 1,000 

-- 

-- 

-- 

-- 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PAGE 53 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Financial Statements 2015 

22. Commitments and Contingencies  

(a) Claims  

There are no claims known to management related to the activities of the Company.  

(b) Patent license agreement  

The Company and the General Hospital Corporation (MGH) have entered into a Patent License Agreement 

pursuant to which the Company may have certain royalty obligations. The Company is also obligated to pay 

MGH up to $ 700,000 in milestone payments upon the achievement of certain development and regulatory 

milestones and, beginning after its first commercial sale of a product covered by the licensed patent rights, a 

$ 10,000 annual license fee which is creditable against royalties due to MGH in the same calendar year. In 

addition, the Company is obligated to pay MGH 2% of any net sales by the Company, its affiliates or 

sublicensees on licensed products made or sold in the United States, as well as a low double-digit percentage 

of any payments the Company may receive from any sublicensee anywhere in the world.  

The Company and the Radboud University Medical Center have entered into a Patent License Agreement 

under which the Company is granted a world-wide exclusive license pursuant to which the Company may 

have certain royalty obligations in relation to its product QR-110 for Leber’s congenital amaurosis. Pursuant 

to the terms the Company has made an upfront payment and has to make sales-based royalty payments 

after market authorization. The Company has the option to make a one-time payment in case the company 

terminates the agreement before or after regulatory approval of the product. The Company may terminate 

the agreement for any reason. 

The Company and the Radboud University Medical Center have entered into a Patent License Agreement 

under which the Company is granted a world-wide exclusive license under which the Company may have 

certain royalty obligations in relation to Type II Usher Syndrome. Pursuant to the terms the Company has 

made an upfront payment and has to make sales-based royalty payments after market authorization. The 

Company has the option to make a one-time payment in case the Company terminates the agreement before 

or after regulatory approval of the product. The Company may terminate the agreement for any reason. 

The Company and the Leiden University Medical Centre have entered into a Patent License Agreement under 

we were granted a world-wide exclusive license pursuant to which we may have certain royalty obligations in 

relation to several CNS diseases. The Company is also obligated to pay LUMC up to € 910,000 in milestone 

payments upon the achievement of certain development and regulatory milestones and, beginning after its 

first commercial sale of a product covered by the licensed patent rights, a € 50,000 annual license fee which is 

creditable against royalties due to LUMC in the same calendar year. In addition, the Company is obligated to 

pay LUMC 3% of any net sales by the Company, its affiliates or sublicensees on licensed products. The 

Company has the right to buy off the royalty obligations by a one-time payment of € 50 million. 

The Company and PARI Pharma GmbH entered into an agreement pursuant to which the Company is granted 

an exclusive license to the use of PARI’s eflow technology for the administration of oligonucleotide-based 

mutations. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, we have made an upfront payment, fees for 

development work and are obligated to make sales-based royalty payments after market authorization. 

(c) Clinical support agreement 

In August 2014, the Company entered into an agreement with Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Therapeutics, Inc., 

or CFFT, a subsidiary of the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, pursuant to which CFFT agreed to provide the 

Company with up to $ 3 million to support the clinical development of QR-010.  

 
 
PAGE 54 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Financial Statements 2015 

Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the Company is obligated to make a one-time milestone payment to 

CFFT of up to approximately $ 80 million, payable in three equal annual installments following the first 

commercial sale of QR-010, the first of which is due within 90 days following the first commercial sale. The 

Company is also obligated to make a one-time milestone payment to CFFT of up to $ 3 million if net sales of 

QR-010 exceed $ 500 million in a calendar year. Lastly, the Company is obligated to make a payment to CFFT 

of up to approximately $ 6 million if it transfers, sells or licenses QR-010 other than for certain clinical or 

development purposes, or if the Company enters into a change of control transaction. Either CFFT or the 

Company may terminate the agreement for cause, which includes the Company’s material failure to achieve 

certain commercialization and development milestones. The Company’s payment obligations survive the 

termination of the agreement.  

(d) Research and development commitments  

The Company has research and development commitments, mainly with CRO's, amounting to € 9,481,000 at 

December 31, 2015 (2014: € 1,758,000). Of these obligations an amount of € 9,084,000 is due in 2016, the 

remainder is due in 1 to 5 years. 

23. Related-Party Transactions  

Details of transactions between the Company and related parties are disclosed below.  

(a) Compensation of the Supervisory Board  

On June 10, 2015, a new member, Mr. Paul Baart, was appointed to our supervisory board. The remuneration 

of the supervisory board members in 2015 is set out in the table below:  

dsssds  

2015 

Mr. Dinko Valerio   

Mr. Henri Termeer 

Mr. Antoine Papiernik 

Ms. Alison Lawton  

Mr. Paul Baart 

Short term 
employee 
benefits 

Post 
employment 
benefits 

Share-based 
payment 

Total 

€ 1,000 

€ 1,000 

€ 1,000 

€ 1,000 

36 

34 

73 

31 

73 

247 

-- 

-- 

-- 

-- 

-- 

-- 

12 

11 

-- 

48 

-- 

71 

48 

45 

73 

79 

73 

318 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The remuneration of the supervisory board members in 2014 is set out in the table below: 

dsssds  

2014 

PAGE 55 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Financial Statements 2015 

Short term 
employee 
benefits 

Post 
employment 
benefits 

Share-based 
payment 

Total 

€ 1,000 

€ 1,000 

€ 1,000 

€ 1,000 

33 

33 

-- 

10 

76 

-- 

-- 

-- 

-- 

-- 

65 

57 

-- 

8 

130 

98 

90 

-- 

18 

206 

Mr. Dinko Valerio   

Mr. Henri Termeer 

Mr. Antoine Papiernik 

Ms. Alison Lawton  

As at December 31, 2015:  

  Mr. Valerio holds 943,420 ordinary shares in the Company, as well as 32,272 options. In 2014, Mr. Valerio 

was granted 64,646 options under the Option Plan to acquire depositary receipts issued for ordinary 

shares at an exercise price of € 1.11 per option. Under this option grant, 32,374 options were exercisable 

immediately, while the remaining 32,272 options vest in four annual equal tranches of 25% starting for 

the first time as of the first anniversary of the date of grant. Mr. Valerio exercised 32,374 options on June 

30, 2014, for which he received 32,374 depositary receipts issued for ordinary shares after payment of 

the exercise price. These depositary receipts have been included in his total number of ordinary shares 

held. 

  Mr. Termeer holds 1,730,714 ordinary shares in the Company as well as 28,709 options. In 2014, 

Mr. Termeer was granted 57,520 options under the Option Plan to acquire depositary receipts issued for 

ordinary shares at an exercise price of € 1.11 per option. Under this option grant 28,811 options were 

exercisable immediately, while the remaining 28,709 options vest in four annual equal tranches of 25% 

starting for the first time as of the first anniversary of the date of grant. Mr. Termeer exercised 28,811 

options on June 30, 2014, for which he received 28,811 depositary receipts issued for ordinary shares 

after payment of the total exercise price. These depositary receipts have been included in his total 

number of ordinary shares.  

  Mr. Antoine Papiernik does not hold any shares or options in the Company. As a managing partner of 

Sofinnova Partners SAS, the management company of Sofinnova Capital VII FCPR, holder of 2,769,125 

ordinary shares, Mr. Papiernik may be deemed to have share voting and investment power with respect 

to such shares.  

  Ms. Lawton holds 12,820 options. In 2014, Ms. Lawton was granted 7,850 options under the Option Plan 

to acquire depositary receipts issued for ordinary shares at an exercise price of € 10.03 per option. In 

2015, she was granted 4,970 options with an exercise price of € 16.10 per option. Under these option 

grants options vest in four annual equal tranches of 25% starting for the first time as of the first 

anniversary of the date of grant. 

  Mr. Paul Baart does not hold any shares or options in the Company.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PAGE 56 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Financial Statements 2015 

(b) Compensation of key management personnel  

Our management board is supported by our officers, or senior management. The total remuneration of the 

management board and senior management in 2015 amounted to € 2,420,000 with the details set out in the 

table below:  

dsssds  

Mr. D.A. de Boer 

Mr. R.K. Beukema  

Management Board 

Senior Management 

2015 

Short term 
employee 
benefits 

Post 
employment 
benefits 

Share-based 
payment 

Total 

€ 1,000 

€ 1,000 

€ 1,000 

€ 1,000 

3971 

3132 

710 

943 

1,653 

7 

13 

20 

27 

47 

164 

88 

252 

468 

720 

568 

414 

982 

1,438 

2,420 

1  
2  

Short term employee benefits in 2015 includes a bonus for Mr. Daniel de Boer, of € 100,000. 
Short term employee benefits in 2015 includes a bonus for Mr. René Beukema, of € 46,000. 

The total remuneration of the management board and senior management in 2014 amounted to € 1,818,000 

with the details set out in the table below:  

dsssds  

2014 

Mr. D.A. de Boer1 

Mr. R.K. Beukema2 

Management Board 

Senior Management 

Short term 
employee 
benefits 

Post 
employment 
benefits 

Share-based 
payment 

Total 

€ 1,000 

€ 1,000 

€ 1,000 

€ 1,000 

696 

154 

850 

448 

1,298 

10 

17 

27 

41 

68 

195 

55 

250 

202 

452 

901 

226 

1,127 

691 

1,818 

1  

2  

Short-term employee benefits in 2014 includes a bonus for our chief executive officer, Mr. Daniel de Boer, of € 500,000. 
Share-based payments includes € 165,000 of employee benefits resulting from the repayment of the loan by Mr. De Boer.  
Mr. René Beukema joined the Company on September 1, 2013 and was appointed to the management board on  
April 17, 2014. The table includes his remuneration received since January 1, 2014.  

As at December 31, 2015:  

  Mr. de Boer holds 1,213,201 ordinary shares in the Company as well as 79,894 options. In 2014, Mr. de 

Boer was awarded a total number of 55,992 options to acquire ordinary shares at € 3.04 per option. In 

2015, he was awarded 23,902 options at an exercise price of € 16.10 per option. These options vest over 

four years in equal annual installments and had a remaining weighted-average contractual life of 8.7 

years at December 31, 2015.  

  Mr. Beukema holds 284,720 ordinary shares in the Company as well as 147,065 options. In 2014, 

Mr. Beukema was awarded 30,541 options to acquire ordinary shares at € 3.04 per option. In 2015, he 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PAGE 57 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Financial Statements 2015 

was awarded 8,713 options at an exercise price of  

€ 16.10 per option. These options vest over four years in equal annual installments and had a remaining 

weighted-average contractual life of 8.0 years at December 31, 2015.  

ProQR does not grant any loans, advanced payments and guarantees to members of the Management and 

Supervisory Board. 

24. Subsequent events  

Material subsequent events have not been identified. 

 
 
 
PAGE 58 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Financial Statements 2015 

Company balance sheet at December 31, 2015 

(Before appropriation of result) 

dsssds  

ASSETS 

Non-current assets 

Intangible assets 

Property, plant and equipment 

Financial fixed assets 

Current assets 

Social securities and other taxes 

Prepayments and other receivables 

Cash and cash equivalents 

TOTAL ASSETS 

EQUITY 

Shareholders' equity 

Share capital 

Share premium reserve 

Equity settled employee benefits reserve 

Translation reserve 

Accumulated deficit 

Unappropriated result 

LIABILITIES 

Provisions 

Non-current liabilities 

Finance lease liabilities 

Borrowings 

Current liabilities 

Finance lease liabilities 

Trade payables 

Social securities and other taxes 

Pension premiums 

Deferred income 

Other current liabilities 

Note 

December 31, 
2015 

December 31, 
2014 

€ 1,000 

€ 1,000 

-- 

-- 

0 

0 

774 

1,638 

94,862 

97,274 

163 

1,187 

-- 

1,350 

426 

735 

112,736 

113,897 

97,274 

115,247 

934 

123,595 

1,899 

1 

(15,798) 

(20,832) 

89,799 

934 

123,581 

687 

-- 

(3,671) 

(12,127) 

109,404 

1,922 

-- 

-- 

4,824 

4,824 

-- 

-- 

38 

-- 

144 

547 

729 

15 

2,814 

2,829 

34 

1,247 

341 

127 

-- 

1,265 

3,014 

27 

28 

29 

30 

31 

32 

13 

33 

TOTAL EQUITY AND LIABILITIES 

97,274 

115,247 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
Company income statement for the year ended December 31, 2015 

dsssds  

Note 

Share in results of participating interests, after taxation 

27 

Other result after taxation 

Net result for the year 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 

PAGE 59 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Financial Statements 2015 

2015 

€ 1,000 

(14,104) 

(6,728) 

2014 

€ 1,000 

-- 

(12,127) 

(20,832) 

(12,127) 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
PAGE 60  / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Financial Statements 2015 

Notes to the Company financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015 

25. General 

The company financial statements are part of the 2015 financial statements of ProQR Therapeutics N.V. (the 

‘Company’) and have been prepared in accordance with the legal requirements of Part 9, Book 2 of the 

Netherlands Civil Code. 

With reference to the income statement of the company, use has been made of the exemption pursuant to 

Section 402 of Book 2 of the Netherlands Civil Code. 

26. Principles for the measurement of assets and liabilities and the determination of the result 

For setting the principles for the recognition and measurement of assets and liabilities and determination of 

the result for its company financial statements, the Company makes use of the option provided in section 

2:362(8) of the Netherlands Civil Code. This means that the principles for the recognition and measurement 

of assets and liabilities and determination of the result (hereinafter referred to as principles for recognition 

and measurement) of the company financial statements of the Company are the same as those applied for 

the consolidated IFRS financial statements. See page 31 for a description of these principles. 

Participating interests in group companies 

Participating interests in group companies are accounted for in the company financial statements according 

to the equity method. If the net asst value is negative, the participating interest is valued at nil. This likewise 

takes into account other long-term interests that should effectively be considered part of the net investment 

in the participating interest. If the company fully or partly guarantees the liabilities of the associated company 

concerned, or has the effective obligation respectively to enable the associated company to pay its (share of 

the) liabilities, a provision is formed. Upon determining this provision, provisions for doubtful debts already 

deducted from the receivables from the associated company are taken into account. Refer to the basis of 

consolidation accounting policy in the consolidated financial statements. 

Result of participating interests 

The share in the result of participating interests consists of the share of the Company in the result of these 

participating interests. In so far as gains or losses on transactions involving the transfer of assets and 

liabilities between the Company and its participating interests or between participating interests themselves 

can be considered unrealised, they have not been recognised. 

27. Financial fixed assets 

dsssds  

Participating interests in group companies 

December 31, 
2015 

December 31, 
2014 

€ 1,000 

€ 1,000 

0 

0 

-- 

-- 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Movements in participating interests were as follows: 

dsssds  

Net asset value as of January 1 

Demerger 

Share in results of participating interests, after taxation 

Exchange differences 

Change in provisions for negative net asset value 

Net asset value as of December 31 

PAGE 61 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Financial Statements 2015 

Participating 
interests  
in group 
 companies  

Total 

€ 1,000 

€ 1,000 

-- 

3,812 

(14,104) 

1 

10,291 

0 

-- 

-- 

-- 

-- 

-- 

-- 

Legal demerger of our Company was effectuated as per June 30, 2015. At December 31, 2015, the Company, 

having its statutory seat in Leiden, the Netherlands, is the ultimate parent company of the following 

consolidated participating interests: 

Name 

ProQR Therapeutics Holding B.V. 

ProQR Therapeutics I B.V. 

ProQR Therapeutics II B.V. 

ProQR Therapeutics III B.V. 

ProQR Therapeutics IV B.V. 

ProQR Therapeutics I Inc. 

Location 

Share in issued capital 

Leiden, the Netherlands 

Leiden, the Netherlands 

Leiden, the Netherlands 

Leiden, the Netherlands 

Leiden, the Netherlands 

Delaware, United States 

100% 

100% 

100% 

100% 

100% 

100% 

For details on the accounts receivable from participating interests and the other receivables, reference is 

made to note 29. 

28. Social Security and Other Taxes 

dsssds  

Value added tax 

All receivables are considered short-term and due within one year.  

December 31, 
2015 

December 31, 
2014 

€ 1,000 

€ 1,000 

774 

774 

426 

426 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PAGE 62 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Financial Statements 2015 

29. Prepayments and Other Receivables  

dsssds  

Accounts receivable from group companies 

Prepayments 

Other receivables 

All receivables are considered short-term and due within one year.  

30. Cash and Cash Equivalents  

dsssds  

Cash at banks 

Bank deposits 

December 31, 
2015 

December 31, 
2014 

€ 1,000 

€ 1,000 

855 

270 

513 

1,638 

-- 

408 

327 

735 

December 31, 
2015 

December 31, 
2014 

€ 1,000 

€ 1,000 

94,862 

-- 

94,862 

83,084 

29,652 

112,736 

The cash at banks is at full disposal of the Company. Bank deposits are convertible into cash upon request of 

the Company. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PAGE 63 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Financial Statements 2015 

31. Shareholders’ equity 

Share 
Capital 

Share 
Premium 

Equity 
Settled 
Employee 
Benefit 
Reserve 

Trans-
lation 
Reserve 

Accumu-
lated 
Deficit 

Unappro-
priated 
result 

Total 
Equity 

€ 1,000 

€ 1,000 

€ 1,000 

€ 1,000 

€ 1,000 

€ 1,000 

Balance at January 1, 2014 

59 

3,482 

Retained result 

Recognition of share-based 
payments 

-- 

-- 

-- 

-- 

Shares issued in the period 

880 

122,291 

Treasury shares issued 

Result for the year 

(5) 

-- 

(2,192) 

-- 

41 

-- 

646 

-- 

-- 

-- 

Balance at December 31, 
2014 

934 

123,581 

687 

Retained result 

Other comprehensive 
income 

Recognition of share-based 
payments 

Share options exercised 

Result for the year 

Balance at December 31, 
2015 

-- 

-- 

-- 

0 

-- 

-- 

-- 

-- 

14 

-- 

-- 

-- 

1,212 

-- 

-- 

-- 

-- 

-- 

-- 

-- 

-- 

-- 

-- 

1 

-- 

-- 

-- 

(418) 

(3,253) 

(89) 

(3,253) 

3,253 

(12,127) 

(12,127) 

-- 

646 

123,171 

(2,197) 

-- 

1 

1,212 

14 

-- 

-- 

-- 

-- 

-- 

-- 

(20,832) 

(20,832) 

-- 

-- 

-- 

-- 

-- 

-- 

-- 

-- 

(3,671) 

(12,127) 

109,404 

(12,127) 

12,127  

934 

123,595 

1,899 

1 

(15,798) 

(20,832) 

89,799 

The 2014 result was added to the accumulated deficit in accordance with the resolution of the Annual 

General Meeting of shareholders. At the upcoming Annual General Meeting of shareholders, it will be 

proposed to add the 2015 result to the accumulated deficit. For more details we refer to note 12 to the 

consolidated financial statements. 

32. Provisions 

dsssds  

December 31, 
2015 

December 31, 
2014 

Provision for negative equity group companies 

€ 1,000 

€ 1,000 

Balance at January 1 

Provisions made during the year 

Balance at December 31 

-- 

1,922 

1,922 

-- 

-- 

-- 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PAGE 64 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Financial Statements 2015 

33. Current Liabilities  

dsssds  

Current portion finance lease liabilities 

Trade payables 

Social securities and other taxes 

Pension premiums 

Deferred income 

Accrued expenses and other liabilities 

December 31, 
2015 

December 31, 
2014 

€ 1,000 

€ 1,000 

-- 

-- 

38 

-- 

144 

547 

729 

34 

1,247 

341 

127 

-- 

1,265 

3,014 

At December 31, 2015, current liabilities includes deferred income resulting from receipt of the first 

installment of the € 6 million grant from the European Commission (EC) under the Horizon 2020 program to 

finance the clinical development of QR-010. 

The majority of the Company’s current liabilities are denominated in euros.  

34. Commitments and Contingencies  

(a) Claims  

There are no claims known to management related to the activities of the Company.  

(b) Clinical support agreement 

In August 2014, the Company entered into an agreement with Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Therapeutics, Inc., 

or CFFT, a subsidiary of the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, pursuant to which CFFT agreed to provide the 

Company with up to $ 3 million to support the clinical development of QR-010.  

Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the Company is obligated to make a one-time milestone payment to 

CFFT of up to approximately $ 80 million, payable in three equal annual installments following the first 

commercial sale of QR-010, the first of which is due within 90 days following the first commercial sale. The 

Company is also obligated to make a one-time milestone payment to CFFT of up to $ 3 million if net sales of 

QR-010 exceed $ 500 million in a calendar year. Lastly, the Company is obligated to make a payment to CFFT 

of up to approximately $ 6 million if it transfers, sells or licenses QR-010 other than for certain clinical or 

development purposes, or if the Company enters into a change of control transaction. Either CFFT or the 

Company may terminate the agreement for cause, which includes the Company’s material failure to achieve 

certain commercialization and development milestones. The Company’s payment obligations survive the 

termination of the agreement.  

(c) Several liability and guarantees 

The Company has issued declarations of joint and several liabilities for debts arising from the actions of 

Dutch consolidated participating interests, as meant in article 2:403 of the Netherlands Civil Code. 

The Company constitutes a tax entity with its Dutch subsidiaries for corporate income tax purposes; the 

standard conditions prescribe that all companies of the tax entity are jointly and severally liable for the 

corporate income tax payable. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
35. Auditor fees 

The fees for services provided by our external auditor, Deloitte Accountants B.V., are specified below for each 

of the financial years indicated: 

PAGE 65 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Financial Statements 2015 

dsssds  

Audit fees 

Audit-related fees 

Tax fees 

All other fees 

Audit fees 

2015 

€ 1,000 

2014 

€ 1,000 

193 

-- 

-- 

-- 

193 

390 

-- 

-- 

-- 

390 

Consist of aggregate fees for professional services provided in connection with the annual audit of our 

financial statements, the review of our quarterly financial statements, consultations on accounting matters 

directly related to the audit, and comfort letters, consents and assistance with and review of documents filed 

with the SEC. Audit fees for 2014 also included fees associated with our initial public offering. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PAGE 66 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Financial Statements 2015 

Signing of the Annual Report 

Leiden, March 31, 2016, 

D.A. de Boer 

D. Valerio 

R.K. Beukema 

H.A. Termeer 

A.B. Papiernik 

A. Lawton 

P.R. Baart (as of June 10, 2015) 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PAGE 67 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Financial Statements 2015 

Other information 

Independent auditor’s report  

Reference is made to the independent auditor’s report as included hereinafter. 

Statutory arrangement concerning the appropriation of the result 

In Article 21 of the Company statutory regulations the following has been presented concerning the 

appropriation of result: 

1. The profit is at the free disposal of the General Meeting of Shareholders. 

2. The Company may only distribute profits to shareholders and other recipients to distributable profits to 

the extent that the equity exceeds the paid-up capital plus the reserves required by law. 

3. Distribution of profits shall take place after adoption of the annual accounts from which it becomes clear 

that distribution is permissible. 

4. When calculating the distribution of profits shares held by the Company shall be disregarded, unless this 

shares has been encumbered with usufruct or right of pledge or certificates thereof are issued as a result of 

which the entitlement to profits accrue to the usufructuary, pledgee or holder of the certificates. 

5. Certificates held by the Company or whereon the Company holds limited rights as a result of which the 

Company is entitled to distribution of profits shall also be disregarded when calculating the distribution of 

profits. 

6. The Company may make interim distributions, only if the requirements in paragraph 2 are met.  

Proposed result appropriation for the financial year 2015 

The Company proposes the general meeting of shareholders to add the loss for the year ended December 

31, 2015 of € 20,832,000 to the accumulated deficit. The financial statements reflect this proposal. 

Subsequent events 

Material subsequent events have not been identified. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PAGE 68 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Financial Statements 2015 

Independent auditor’s report 

To the Shareholders and Supervisory Board of ProQR Therapeutics N.V.  

Report on the audit of the financial statements 2015  

Our Opinion 

We have audited the financial statements 2015 of ProQR Therapeutics N.V. based in Leiden, The Netherlands. 

The financial statements include the consolidated financial statements and the company financial 

statements. 

In our opinion: 

 

The consolidated financial statements give a true and fair view of the financial position of ProQR 

Therapeutics N.V. as of December 31, 2015, and of its result and its cash flows for 2015 in accordance 

with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union (IFRS-EU) and with 

Part 9 of Book 2 of the Dutch Civil Code. 

 

The company financial statements give a true and fair view of the financial position of ProQR 

Therapeutics N.V. as of December 31, 2015, and of its result for 2015 in accordance with Part 9 of Book 2 

of the Dutch Civil Code. 

What we have audited 

The consolidated financial statements comprise: 

 

 

 

The consolidated statement of financial position as at December 31, 2015. 

The following consolidated statements for the year ended December 31, 2015:  profit or loss and 

comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows. 

The notes comprising a summary of the significant accounting policies and other explanatory 

information.  

The company financial statements comprise: 

 

 

 

The company balance sheet at December 31, 2015. 

The company income statement for the year ended December 31, 2015. 

The notes comprising a summary of the significant accounting policies and other explanatory 

information.  

Basis for our opinion 

We conducted our audit in accordance with Dutch law, including the Dutch Standards on Auditing. Our 

responsibilities under those standards are further described in the “Our responsibilities for the audit of the 

financial statements” section of our report. 

We are independent of ProQR Therapeutics N.V. in accordance with the Verordening inzake de 

onafhankelijkheid van accountants bij assurance-opdrachten (ViO) and other relevant independence 

regulations in the Netherlands. Furthermore we have complied with the Verordening gedrags- en 

beroepsregels accountants (VGBA). 

We believe the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our 

opinion. 

 
 
PAGE 69 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Financial Statements 2015 

Our audit approach 

As part of our audit we have determined materiality and used it to assess the risks of material misstatement. 

We have specifically assessed accounts where subjectivity is high because of estimates regarding uncertain 

future developments. We have likewise specifically focused on the risk related to management override of 

controls and the risk of material misstatement due to fraud. In addition, our audit expressly included the 

continuity and reliability of the automated information systems. 

Materiality 

Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, 

they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these 

financial statements. The materiality affects the nature, timing and extent of our audit procedures and the 

evaluation of the effect of identified misstatements on our opinion. 

Based on our professional judgement we determined the materiality for the financial statements as a whole 

at EUR 2 million. The materiality is based on 7,5% of normalized loss before tax. We have also taken into 

account misstatements and/or possible misstatements that in our opinion are material for the users of the 

financial statements for qualitative reasons. 

We agreed with the supervisory board that misstatements in excess of EUR 100,000, which are identified 

during the audit, would be reported to them, as well as smaller misstatements that in our view must be 

reported on qualitative grounds. 

Scope of the group audit 

ProQR Therapeutics N.V. is at the head of a group of entities. The financial information of this group is 

included in the financial statements of ProQR Therapeutics N.V.. 

Because we are ultimately responsible for the opinion, we are also responsible for directing, supervising and 

performing the group audit. In this respect we have determined the nature and extent of the audit 

procedures to be carried out for group entities. Decisive were the size and/or the risk profile of the group 

entities or operations. We have performed audit procedures on all group entities. The work is performed by 

the group engagement team. 

The financial administration for all group entities is centralized in the Netherlands. Consequently, we have 

centralized our audit approach and we have been able to obtain sufficient and appropriate audit evidence 

about the group’s financial information to provide an opinion about the financial statements. 

Our key audit matters 

Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our 

audit of the financial statements. We have communicated the key audit matters to the supervisory board. The 

key audit matters are not a comprehensive reflection of all matters discussed. 

These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the financial statements as a whole and in 

forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters. 

Research and development expenses 

The total research and development expenses for the year 2015 amounts to EUR 23.4 million. These research 

and development expenses consists of payroll costs of employees as well as outsourced research and 

development activities with third party suppliers. The research and development activities with these 

suppliers are concluded in master service agreements and statements of work. These outsourced research 

and development activities are typically performed over a period of time and allocation of expenses in each 

 
 
PAGE 70  / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Financial Statements 2015 

reporting period based on the progress of the work involves judgment. Our audit procedures included, 

amongst others, the review of the agreements with suppliers and the related accounting evaluation as well as 

the timing of expenses recognized. 

Significant contracts 

In 2015, ProQR Therapeutics N.V. concluded several significant contracts, amongst others, the agreements 

with European Commission in relation to H2020 grant and the above mentioned research and development 

agreements. These contracts contain terms and conditions that may require complex accounting and/or 

significant long-term commitments that require disclosure in the financial statements. Our audit procedures 

included, amongst others, the review of the contract register, review of the contract terms and related 

accounting evaluation of the impact on the financial statements including disclosures of the commitments.   

Cash and cash equivalents 

The total cash and cash equivalents as per December 31, 2015 amounts to EUR 94.9 million. We focused on 

this area as the cash and cash equivalents are material to the financial statements. We reconciled the bank 

balances to bank confirmations, recalculated the foreign exchange result on these balances and reviewed the 

bank confirmations and underlying agreements for deposit balances to assess the presentation and 

disclosure in the financial statements.  

Responsibilities of management and the supervisory board for the financial statements 

Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in 

accordance with EU-IFRS and Part 9 of Book 2 of the Dutch Civil Code, and for the preparation of the 

management board report in accordance with Part 9 of Book 2 of the Dutch Civil Code. Furthermore, 

management is responsible for such internal control as management determines is necessary to enable the 

preparation of the financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or 

error. 

As part of the preparation of the financial statements, management is responsible for assessing the 

company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Based on the financial reporting framework mentioned, 

management should prepare the financial statements using the going concern basis of accounting unless 

management either intends to liquidate the company or to cease operations, or has no realistic alternative 

but to do so. Management should disclose events and circumstances that may cast significant doubt on the 

company’s ability to continue as a going concern in the financial statements. 

The supervisory board is responsible for overseeing the company’s financial reporting process. 

Our responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements 

Our objective is to plan and perform the audit assignment in a manner that allows us to obtain sufficient and 

appropriate audit evidence for our opinion. 

Our audit has been performed with a high, but not absolute, level of assurance, which means we may not 

have detected all errors and fraud. 

For an overview of our responsibilities we refer to the appendix of this audit report. 

 
 
 
PAGE 71 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Financial Statements 2015 

Report on other legal and regulatory requirements 

Report on the management board report and the other information 

Pursuant to legal requirements of Part 9 of Book 2 of the Dutch Civil Code (concerning our obligation to 

report about the management board report and other information): 

  We have no deficiencies to report as a result of our examination whether the management board 

report, to the extent we can assess, has been prepared in accordance with Part 9 of Book 2 of the Dutch 

Civil Code, and whether the information as required by Part 9 of Book 2 of the Dutch Civil Code has 

been annexed. 

  We report that management board report, to the extent we can assess, is consistent with the financial 

statements. 

Engagement 

We were engaged by the supervisory board as auditor of ProQR Therapeutics N.V. as of the audit for the year 

2012 and operated as statutory auditor ever since that date. 

Amsterdam, March 31, 2016 

Deloitte Accountants B.V. 

P.J.M.A. van de Goor 

 
 
 
 
 
 
PAGE 72 / 72 
Annual Report 2015 
Financial Statements 2015 

Appendix to the independent auditor’s report 

Our responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements 

We have exercised professional judgment and have maintained professional skepticism throughout the audit, 

in accordance with Dutch Standards on Auditing, ethical requirements and independence requirements. Our 

audit included e.g.: 

 

Identifying and assessing the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to 

fraud or error, designing and performing audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtaining audit 

evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of not detecting a 

material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may 

involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control. 

  Obtaining an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures 

that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the 

 

 

 

 

effectiveness of the Company’s internal control. 

Evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting 

estimates and related disclosures made by management.  

Concluding on the appropriateness of management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting, and 

based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or 

conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. If we 

conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw attention in our auditor’s report to 

the related disclosures in the financial statements or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to modify our 

opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s report. 

However, future events or conditions may cause the Company ceasing to continue as a going concern. 

Evaluating the overall presentation, structure and content of the financial statements, including the 

disclosures. 

Evaluating whether the financial statements represent the underlying transactions and events in a 

manner that achieves fair presentation. 

We communicate with the Supervisory Board regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing 

of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant findings in internal control that we identify 

during our audit.  

We provide the Supervisory Board with a statement that we have complied with relevant ethical 

requirements regarding independence, and to communicate with them all relationships and other matters 

that may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence, and where applicable, related safeguards.  

From the matters communicated with the Supervisory Board, we determine those matters that were of most 

significance in the audit of the financial statements of the current period and are therefore the key audit 

matters. We describe these matters in our auditor’s report unless law or regulation precludes public 

disclosure about the matter or, in extremely rare circumstances, when non-mentioning is in the public 

interest. 

 
 
ANNUAL

REPORT 

2015

It’s in our RNA

Including magazine

ProQR Therapeutics N.V. 

T:  +31 88 166 7000 

W: www.proqr.com 

E:  info@proqr.com

Office Leiden:

Darwinweg 24, 2333 CR Leiden, 

The Netherlands

Office Palo Alto:

543 Bryant Street, Palo Alto, 

CA 94301, US