Contents
Vision & Mission Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Letter to our Shareholders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Financial Highlights . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
A Picture of Growth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
By the Numbers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Form 10-K. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Directors & Executives . . . . . . . . . Inside Back Cover
Prosperity Bancshares, Inc.® Board of Directors
Prosperity Bancshares, Inc.® Officers
Prosperity Bank® Board of Directors
Prosperity Bank® Executive Committee
Investor Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Back Cover
Our
Vision...
Provide our customers with a quality of
product and service that will meet or
exceed their expectations!
Our
Mission...
• Smile
• Greet the Customer by Name
• Try to say “YES” instead of no!
1
To our shareholders, customers and friends:
Without question, 2004 was the most successful year in
our history with net income reaching $34.7 million. This
represents an increase of $8.2 million or 30.70 percent when
compared with 2003. Earnings per fully diluted share were
$1.59 and were 16.90 percent higher than 2003.
We acquired two of the three remaining independent banks
in Travis County, Texas, adding seven full-service banking
centers, bringing our total banking centers to 58 in the
Houston, Dallas, Victoria and Austin areas.
The acquisitions of Village Bank and Trust and Liberty
Bank in Austin give us the opportunity to compete effectively
with other major banks in the Austin area.
In addition to theses two acquisitions, we announced the
signing of a definitive agreement to acquire First Capital
Bankers, Inc. and its Corpus Christi, Texas-based subsidiary
bank, FirstCapital Bank, ssb. At the end of December, First
Ned S. Holmes
Chairman of the Board
David Zalman
President & Chief Executive Officer
Capital Bankers had total assets of $761.6 million, loans of $499.0 million, deposits of $629.6 million and
shareholders’ equity of $61.7 million.
Immediately following the acquisition of First Capital Bankers, Inc., we will have a total of eighty-five banking
centers: Seven in the Austin area, sixteen in the Corpus Christi area, eleven in the Dallas area, thirty-three in the
Houston CMSA and eighteen in the fifteen contiguous counties south and southwest of Houston.
Internal Loan Growth
Two thousand and four saw a return to our historical internal “same store” growth levels. That is to say,
organically, loans grew 9.90 percent for the year. We ended the year with lenders in each of our 58
banking centers with the authority to meet our customers’ and prospects’ borrowing needs. This positions
us well for 2005.
2
$100,000 invested in PRSP at
IPO on 11/12/1998 was worth
$516,410 on 12/31/2004
Our Stock Performance for 2004
(percent)
Our shareholders are focused on stock perform-
ance. The adjacent graph reflects the value of
$100,000 invested in 1998 at year-end 2004.
Our stock has out performed both the
NASDAQ Bank Index and the Russell 3000 on
a continuous basis since May of 2001.
The Economy and the Unknowns
Source: CRSP, Center for Research in Security Prices, Graduate School of Business, The University of Chicago 2004.
Used with permission. All rights reserved. www.crsp.com. SNL Financial LC © 2004
Texas, along with the rest of the country, continues its economic recovery. The price of oil and natural gas provide
added impetus for our recovery. We expect net job growth to continue in the three major metropolitan areas we now
serve, Austin, Houston and Dallas. We also anticipate net job growth in the Corpus Christi area.
While we expect a rising interest rate environment throughout 2005, the economic indicators are positive in each of
our sub-markets.
Conclusion
As in prior years, throughout 2004, earnings per share, growth and asset quality were paramount. These will remain
major initiatives in 2005 as we integrate FirstCapital Bank.
We continue to look for acquisition opportunities that will add shareholder value while broadening and deepening
our penetration of the many Texas markets we now serve. We strive to provide a strong and consistent performance
rooted in a strategy of expanding our customer base while maintaining solid asset quality and cost controls.
Over the period 2000 through 2004 we have delivered a compound annual growth rate of 23.85 percent in assets,
26.00 percent in loans, 22.36 percent in deposits and 34.20 percent in net income.
Throughout 2005 we will be mindful of these accomplishments as we continue to execute our proven business strategy.
Ned S. Holmes
Chairman of the Board
David Zalman
President & Chief Executive Officer
3
Financial Highlights
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
Restated for the period 2000 through 2001,
pursuant to the Pooling of Interests resulting
from the acquisition of Commercial Bancshares
and its subsidiary, Heritage Bank.
Net Income (In 000’s)
Return on Average Assets
Return on Average Shareholders' Equity
Net Interest Margin (Tax Equivalent)
Efficiency Ratio
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
$ 10,701
$ 12,958
$ 21,321
$ 26,548
$ 34,707
1.02%
14.67%
3.56%
62.29%
1.09%
15.19%
3.71%
60.14%
20.73%
1.45%
18.66%
4.00%
50.36%
28.16%
1.32%
15.60%
3.64%
51.58%
29.94%
1.36%
14.27%
3.63%
49.23%
33.41%
Return on Average Tangible Shareholders' Equity
20.32%
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING (IN 000’S) (A)
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding Basic
16,064
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding Diluted
16,454
16,172
16,498
17,122
17,442
19,225
19,536
21,534
21,804
PER SHARE (A)
Net Income (Diluted)
Book Value at Year-End
Cash Dividends Declared
CAPITAL RATIOS
Equity to Assets Ratio
Tangible Equity to Tangible Assets Ratio
Tier 1 Risk Based Capital Ratio
Total Risk Based Capital Ratio
Leverage Ratio
BALANCE SHEET DATA (YEAR-END) (IN 000’S)
Loans
Securities
Deposits
Shareholders' Equity
Total Assets
$ 0.65
$ 0.79
$ 1.22
4.98
0.18
5.47
0.20
8.19
0.22
$ 1.36
10.49
0.25
$ 1.59
12.32
0.31
7.01%
5.02%
13.80%
14.93%
6.17%
7.02%
5.33%
18.34%
19.52%
7.57%
8.49%
4.70%
14.10%
15.30%
6.56%
9.15%
4.17%
15.82%
16.90%
7.10%
10.22%
4.38%
13.56%
14.67%
6.30%
$ 411,203
$ 424,400
$ 679,559
$ 770,053 $ 1,035,513
586,952
752,322
950,317
1,376,880
1,302,792
1,033,546
1,123,397
1,586,611
2,083,748
2,317,076
80,333
88,725
154,739
219,588
275,647
1,146,520
1,263,169
1,823,286
2,400,487
2,697,228
ASSET QUALITY RATIOS
Non-performing Assets to Loans
& Other Real Estate
0.32%
Net (Recoveries) / Charge-offs to Average Loans
(0.04%)
Allowance for Credit Losses to Total Loans
1.34%
COMMON STOCK MARKET PRICE
0.00%
0.06%
1.41%
0.38%
0.08%
1.41%
0.13%
0.23%
1.34%
0.17%
0.06%
1.27%
Common Stock Market Price-High
$ 10.00
$ 13.94
$ 19.95
$ 24.35
$ 29.53
Common Stock Market Price-Low
6.44
8.75
13.48
16.16
21.89
(A) Data for 2002 and prior years has been restated to include the two-for-one stock split effective May 31, 2002.
5
A Picture of Growth
2004 – In Austin
• The two largest independent banks in Travis County, Texas, Village Bank & Trust and Liberty Bank were
successfully integrated in August and September of 2004.
• Seven locations in Austin were added.
• Experienced lenders and significant community involvement became the immediate result as we welcomed
Edward Safady as Austin Area Chairman and Mike Meyer as President of our Lakeway Banking Center.
2005 – Corpus Christi, Victoria and Houston
• We announced the definitive agreement to acquire First Capital Bankers, Inc., and its subsidiary, FirstCapital Bank, ssb.
• At acquisition we will have 85 locations running from Corpus Christi up the NAFTA Highway, US 59, through Houston
and into Dallas and Austin.
• First Capital Bankers with $761.6 million in assets has approximately one third of its loans in each of the sub-markets of
Houston, Corpus Christi and Victoria. They will also add $629.6 million in deposits.
• Our combined company will have loans and deposits as depicted in the pie charts below.
COMBINED COMPANY LOAN COMPOSITION
PROSPERITY BANK AND FIRSTCAPITAL
COMBINED COMPANY DEPOSIT COMPOSITION
PROSPERITY BANK AND FIRSTCAPITAL
TOTAL LOANS: $1,534,506,000 Proforma 12-31-04
TOTAL DEPOSITS: $2,950,818,000 Proforma 12-31-04
• After the merger, Prosperity’s footprint will appear as shown on the following map:
PROSPERITY BANK® – represented by red triangles
PROSPERITY’S FOOTPRINT IN TEXAS
58 Full-service Locations
• 29 in Houston CMSA
• 11 in Dallas area
• 7 in Austin
• 11 along NAFTA Highway
FIRSTCAPITAL BANK – represented by blue squares
27 Full-service Locations
• 15 in Corpus Christi area
• 4 in Houston CMSA
• 8 in South Texas
7
By the Numbers
Net Income Growth
NET INCOME
• 2004 saw unprecedented growth in net income from $26.5 million in 2003
to $34.7 million, an increase of 30.70%. The adjacent graphic presentation
reflects net income growing from $10.7 million in 2000 to $34.7 million
in 2004. This represents a compound annual growth rate of 34.20%.
Asset Growth
TOTAL ASSETS
• Total assets up by 12.36% to $2.697 billion vs. 2003.
• At year-end 2000, total assets were $1.146 billion. The company
has experienced a compound annual growth rate of 23.85% over the period
2000 through 2004.
Asset Mix
• At year-end 2004, the asset mix reflected securities at 49% and loans at 38%.
Over the past year we have moved the loan to asset ratio from 31% at
December 2003, to 38% at year-end 2004.
Loan Growth & Portfolio Composition
• In 2004, loans grew to $1.035 billion. This was a 34.47% growth rate, reflecting
a 9.90% internal growth and a 24.50% acquisition growth. It is our goal to
continue to grow loans through the combination of our internal growth and
acquisition strategies.
ASSET MIX
LOAN GROWTH
• Loan portfolio composition for the years
LOAN PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION – 2001
LOAN PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION – 2004
2001 and 2004, as depicted on the
accompanying pie charts, reflect the
shift from 1-4 family residential and
home equity to commercial & industrial
and commercial real estate.
9
NON-PERFORMING LOANS TO TOTAL LOANS & ORE
Asset Quality
• We ended 2004 with $1.72 million in non-performing loans or 0.17% of
total loans and other real estate. This is slightly more than the $967 thousand
reported in 2003. Nevertheless, we continue well below our peers and remain
committed to asset quality.
NET CHARGE-OFFS TO AVERAGE LOANS
• For the year we had net charge-offs of $484 thousand compared to
$1.6 million in 2003. The improvement is the result of requiring acquisitions
to divest a larger portion of problem loans prior to merger consumation.
ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES
• Our allowance for credit losses ended the year at
1.27% of total loans. This was $13.1 million in total loan
loss reserves.
DEPOSITS BY TYPE
Deposit Portfolio Composition
• Approximately 66% of the bank’s fundings are in free, interest bearing checking,
and money market accounts. Only 18% of the deposits are in CDs and IRAs
over $100,000.
• We have no brokered CDs.
EFFICIENCY RATIO
Efficiency Ratio or How much of Each Dollar does
Prosperity Deliver to the Bottom Line
• As investors know, the lower the efficiency ratio, the more we are able to bring
to our bottom line. We improved the efficiency ratio from 51.58% in 2003 to
49.23% in 2004. We have been in the low 50s% to the high 40s% since 2001 when
we acquired Commercial Bancshares. One of our stated goals is to maintain the
efficiency ratio in a similar range.
10
Shareholders’ Equity
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
• Shareholders’ equity ended the year at $275.6 million, a 25.23% increase
over year-end 2003. For the period December 2000 through December 2004,
shareholders’ equity has grown from $80.3 million to $275.6 million, which
equates to a 36.10% compound annual growth rate.
Shareholders’ Tangible Equity
TANGIBLE EQUITY TO TANGIBLE ASSET RATIO
• Tangible equity ratio ended the year at 4.38%. As the accompanying graph
shows, the tangible equity ratio has ranged from a low of 4.17% to a high of
5.33%. Management is comfortable with this range as we continue executing
our internal growth and acquisition strategies.
Return on Average Shareholders’ Equity and
RETURN ON AVERAGE EQUITY
Average Tangible Equity
• The return on average shareholders’ equity fell from 15.60% to 14.27% as share-
holders’ equity increased from $219.6 million to $275.6 million. The increase
was due primarily to the acquisition of the two Austin area banks.
• The return on average tangible shareholders’ equity was 33.41%
RETURN ON AVERAGE TANGIBLE EQUITY
for 2004, up from 29.94% for 2003.
Return on Average Assets
RETURN ON AVERAGE ASSETS
• Return on average assets was 1.36% for 2004, as compared
with 1.32% for 2003. As noted previously, assets
grew by 12.36% while shareholders’ equity grew by 25.53%
from 2003 to 2004.
11
SHAREHOLDER PERSPECTIVE – THE PER SHARE VIEW
PER SHARE NET INCOME (DILUTED)
Per Share Net Income (Diluted)
• Net income grew 16.91% year-over-year 2003 to 2004, from $1.36
to $1.59. Over the period 2000 through 2004, the compound annual
growth rate was 25.10%.
BOOK VALUE AT YEAR END PER SHARE
Book Value per Share
• During the period 2000 through 2004, book value per share increased from
$4.98 to $12.32, which represents a 25.40% compound annual growth rate.
CASH DIVIDENDS PER SHARE
Dividends per Share
• We have increased the dividend payout from $0.18 per share in 2000
to $0.31 per share in 2004. We also announced an increase for 2005 to
$0.33 per share.
PROSPECTS FOR 2005
• We enter 2005 with 58 banking centers staffed by experienced bankers, “Real Bankers®,” with the skill and authority to
meet or exceed our customers’ needs. These same bankers are well-schooled in our Mission Statement. Our customers
will find no 1-800 telephone numbers as they are able to deal with local bankers for all their banking needs.
• We believe that our success is built on being a community bank with the ability to meet the needs of our customers
and prospects. Prosperity’s bankers live in their respective communities and are involved in those communities’
economic well-being.
• We will continue this same business model as we complete the acquisition of FirstCapital Bank. This merger will
add twenty-seven banking centers in the Corpus Christi, Victoria and Houston areas and substantially increase our
outstanding loans and deposits.
• We will continue to look for merger partners, i.e. banks, whose management is interested in partnering with us to
become part of our growing and dynamic Texas-based franchise.
• As in 2003, throughout 2004, and into 2005 our bankers taught and will teach the FDIC’s approved and endorsed
“Money Smart” program which offers consumers a level of education which fosters understanding and appreciation
of the benefits of commercial banks, their products, services and the role they play in each community.
12
(Mark One)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
______________________
FORM 10-K
[ X ] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For The Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2004
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 0-25051
PROSPERITY BANCSHARES, INC. ®
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
TEXAS
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
74-2331986
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
PROSPERITY BANK PLAZA
4295 SAN FELIPE
HOUSTON, TEXAS
(Address of principal executive offices)
77027
(Zip Code)
Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (713) 693-9300
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, par value
$1.00 per share
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file
such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and
will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of the Form 10-K or any amendment of this Form 10-K. [ ]
The aggregate market value of the shares of Common Stock held by non-affiliates, based on the closing price of the Common
Stock on the Nasdaq National Market System on June 30, 2004 was approximately $380.3 million.
As of March 1, 2005, the number of outstanding shares of Common Stock was 27,471,396.
Documents Incorporated by Reference:
Portions of the Company’s Proxy Statement relating to the 2005 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which will be filed within
120 days after December 31, 2004, are incorporated by reference into Part III, Items 10-14 of this Form 10-K.
PROSPERITY BANCSHARES, INC.
2004 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
®
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
PART II
Item 1. Business .......................................................................................................................................
General .....................................................................................................................................
2004 Mergers and Acquisitions................................................................................................
Recent Developments...............................................................................................................
Available Information ..............................................................................................................
Officers and Associates............................................................................................................
Banking Activities....................................................................................................................
Business Strategies...................................................................................................................
Competition..............................................................................................................................
Supervision and Regulation .....................................................................................................
1
1
2
2
3
3
3
4
4
5
Item 2. Properties ..................................................................................................................................... 11
Item 3. Legal Proceedings........................................................................................................................ 15
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.................................................................. 15
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer Purchases
of Equity Securities .................................................................................................................. 16
Item 6. Selected Consolidated Financial Data ......................................................................................... 18
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations ...... 20
Overview.................................................................................................................................. 21
Critical Accounting Policies..................................................................................................... 21
Results of Operations ............................................................................................................... 22
Financial Condition.................................................................................................................. 27
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk ...................................................... 42
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data............................................................................ 43
Item 9. Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure ...... 44
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures ............................................................................................................. 44
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant ..................................................................... 46
Item 11. Executive Compensation ............................................................................................................. 46
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management ......................................... 46
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.......................................................................... 46
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services...................................................................................... 46
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules ............................................................................... 47
Signatures
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
General
Prosperity Bancshares, Inc.
® , a Texas corporation (the “Company”), was formed in 1983 as a vehicle to acquire the former
Allied Bank in Edna, Texas which was chartered in 1949 as The First National Bank of Edna. The Company is a registered financial
holding company that derives substantially all of its revenues and income from the operation of its bank subsidiary, Prosperity Bank®
(“Prosperity Bank®” or the “Bank”). The Bank provides a broad line of financial products and services to small and medium-sized
businesses and consumers. As of December 31, 2004, the Bank operated fifty-eight (58) full-service banking locations; with twenty-
nine (29) in the Greater Houston Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area (“CMSA”), eleven (11) in eight contiguous counties
situated south and southwest of Houston and extending into South Texas, seven (7) in the Austin, Texas area and eleven (11) in the
Dallas/Fort Worth area. The Greater Houston CMSA includes Austin, Brazoria, Chambers, Fort Bend, Galveston, Harris, Liberty,
Montgomery, San Jacinto and Waller counties. The Company's headquarters are located at Prosperity Bank Plaza, 4295 San Felipe in
Houston, Texas and its telephone number is (713) 693-9300. The Company’s website address is www.prosperitybanktx.com.
The Company's market consists of the communities served by its locations in the Greater Houston Texas CMSA, additional
locations in eight contiguous counties located to the south and southwest of Houston, Texas, its eleven banking locations in the
Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas area and its seven locations in the Austin, Texas area. US Highway 59 (scheduled to become Interstate
Highway 69), which serves as the primary “NAFTA Highway” linking the interior United States and Mexico, runs directly through
the center of the Company’s market area. The increased traffic along this NAFTA Highway has enhanced economic activity in the
Company’s market area and created opportunities for growth. The diverse nature of the economies in each local market served by the
Company provides the Company with a varied customer base and allows the Company to spread its lending risk throughout a number
of different industries including farming, ranching, petrochemicals, manufacturing, tourism, recreation and professional service firms
and their principals. The Company's market areas outside of Houston, Dallas and Austin are dominated by either small community
banks or branches of large regional banks. Management believes that the Company, as one of the few mid-sized financial institutions
that combines responsive community banking with the sophistication of a regional bank holding company, has a competitive
advantage in its market areas and excellent growth opportunities through acquisitions, new Banking Center locations and additional
business development.
Operating under a community banking philosophy, the Company seeks to develop broad customer relationships based on
service and convenience while maintaining its conservative approach to lending and strong asset quality. The Company has grown
through a combination of internal growth, the acquisition of community banks, branches of banks and the opening of new banking
centers. Utilizing a low cost of funds and employing stringent cost controls, the Company has been profitable in every full year of its
existence, including the period of adverse economic conditions in Texas in the late 1980s. From 1988 to 1992, as a sound and
profitable institution, the Company took advantage of this economic downturn and acquired the deposits and certain assets of failed
banks in West Columbia, El Campo and Cuero, Texas and two failed banks in Houston, which diversified the Company's franchise
and increased its core deposits. The Company opened a full-service Banking Center in Victoria, Texas in 1993 and the following year
established a Banking Center in Bay City, Texas. The Company expanded its Bay City presence in 1996 with the acquisition of an
additional branch location from Norwest Bank Texas (now Wells Fargo), and in 1997, the Company acquired the Angleton, Texas
branch of Wells Fargo Bank. In 1998, the Company enhanced its West Columbia Banking Center with the purchase of a commercial
bank branch located in West Columbia and acquired Union State Bank in East Bernard, Texas.
1
From December 31, 1998 through December 31, 2004, the Company grew through internal growth and the completion of the
following acquisitions:
Acquired Entity
Completion Date
Number of
Banking Centers
Added (1)
South Texas Bancshares, Inc. ...........................
Compass Bank (5 branches) .............................
Commercial Bancshares, Inc. ...........................
Texas Guaranty Bank, N.A...............................
The First State Bank of Needville (2) ...............
Paradigm Bancorporation, Inc. .........................
Southwest Bank Holding Company..................
First National Bank of Bay City (2)..................
Abrams Centre Bancshares, Inc........................
Dallas Bancshares, Inc......................................
MainBancorp, Inc. ............................................
First State Bank of North Texas........................
Liberty Bancshares, Inc. ...................................
Village Bank and Trust, s.s.b............................
____________________________________
1999
2000
2001
2002
2002
2002
2002
2002
2003
2003
2003
2003
2004
2004
3
4
12
3
--
8
2
--
1
1
4
3
6
1
(1) The number of banking centers added gives effect to any locations of the acquired entity that were consolidated into existing
banking centers of the Company.
(2) The only banking center of the acquired entity was closed and consolidated into an existing banking center of the Company.
2004 Mergers and Acquisitions
On August 1, 2004, the Company completed its acquisition of Village Bank and Trust, s.s.b. (“Village”), Austin, Texas.
Under the terms of the agreement, the Company paid approximately $19.1 million in cash for all of the issued and outstanding capital
stock of Village. Village was privately held and operated one (1) banking office in the Lakeway area of Austin, Texas. As of June 30,
2004, Village had total assets of $110.9 million, loans of $79.7 million, deposits of $97.3 million and shareholders’ equity of $10.4
million.
On August 1, 2004, the Company completed its acquisition of Liberty Bancshares, Inc. (“Liberty”), Austin, Texas, pursuant
to which Liberty was merged into the Company and its wholly owned subsidiary, Liberty Bank, S.S.B., was merged into the Bank.
Under the terms of the agreement, the Company paid approximately $8.9 million in cash and issued approximately 1.3 million shares
of its Common Stock for all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Liberty and Liberty Bank and converted all outstanding
stock options to acquire Liberty common stock into options to acquire approximately 108,000 shares of Prosperity common stock.
Liberty was privately held and operated six (6) banking offices in Austin, Texas. As of June 30, 2004, Liberty had, on a consolidated
basis, total assets of $178.7 million, loans of $120.3 million, deposits of $158.9 million and shareholders’ equity of $16.5 million.
Recent Developments
On March 1, 2005, the Company completed its acquisition of FirstCapital Bankers, Inc. (“First Capital”), Corpus Christi,
Texas. Under the terms of the agreement, First Capital was merged into the Company and First Capital’s wholly owned subsidiary,
FirstCapital Bank, s.s.b. was merged into the Bank. The Company issued approximately 5.079 million shares of its common stock for
all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of First Capital and converted all outstanding options to acquire First Capital common
stock into options to acquire approximately 234,000 shares of Prosperity common stock. First Capital was privately held and
operated thirty-two (32) banking offices in and around Corpus Christi, Houston and Victoria, Texas, five of which were closed and
consolidated with existing banking centers of the Company. As of December 31, 2004, First Capital had, on a consolidated basis, total
assets of $761.6 million, loans of $499.0 million, deposits of $629.6 million and shareholders’ equity of $61.7 million.
2
On December 31, 2004, the Company redeemed in full the $12.4 million in junior subordinated debentures issued to
Prosperity Capital Trust I. Prosperity Capital Trust I in turn redeemed in full the trust preferred securities and common securities it
issued.
Available Information
The Company's website address is www.prosperitybanktx.com. The Company makes available free of charge on or through
its website its annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those
reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as soon as
reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Information contained on the Company's website is not incorporated by reference into this annual report on Form 10-K and is not part
of this or any other report.
Officers and Associates
The Company's directors and officers are important to the Company's success and play a key role in the Company's business
development efforts by actively participating in a number of civic and public service activities in the communities served by the
Company, such as the Rotary Club, Lion's Club, Pilot Club, United Way and Chamber of Commerce.
The Company has invested heavily in its officers and associates by recruiting talented officers in its market areas and
providing them with economic incentive in the form of stock options and bonuses based on cross-selling performance. The senior
management team has substantial experience in the Houston, Dallas and Austin markets and the surrounding communities in which
the Company has a presence. Each banking center location is administered by a local President or Manager with knowledge of the
community and lending expertise in the specific industries found in the community. The Company entrusts its banking center
Presidents and Managers with authority and flexibility within general parameters with respect to product pricing and decision making
in order to avoid the bureaucratic structure of larger banks. The Company operates each banking center as a separate profit center,
maintaining separate data with respect to each banking center's net interest income, efficiency ratio, deposit growth, loan growth and
overall profitability. Banking center presidents and managers are accountable for performance in these areas and compensated
accordingly. The Company has no 1-800 telephone numbers. Each banking center has its own listed local business telephone
number, which enables a customer to be served by a local banker with decision making authority.
As of December 31, 2004, the Company and the Bank had 653 full-time equivalent associates, 237 of whom were officers of
the Bank. The Company provides medical and hospitalization insurance to its full-time associates. The Company considers its
relations with associates to be excellent. Neither the Company nor the Bank is a party to any collective bargaining agreement.
Banking Activities
The Company, through the Bank, offers a variety of traditional loan and deposit products to its customers, which consist
primarily of consumers and small and medium-sized businesses. The Bank tailors its products to the specific needs of customers in a
given market. At December 31, 2004, the Bank maintained approximately 139,000 separate deposit accounts and 15,400 separate loan
accounts and 22.4% of the Bank’s total deposits were noninterest-bearing demand deposits. For the year ended December 31, 2004,
the Company's average cost of funds was 1.30%. The Company’s average cost of deposits (excluding borrowings) was 1.15% for the
year ended December 31, 2004.
The Company has been an active mortgage lender, with commercial mortgage and 1-4 family residential loans comprising
60.8% of the Company's total loans as of December 31, 2004. The Company also offers loans for automobiles and other consumer
durables, home equity loans, debit cards, internet banking and other cash management services and automated telephone banking. By
offering certificates of deposit, checking with interest accounts, savings accounts and overdraft protection at competitive rates, the
Company gives its depositors a full range of traditional deposit products.
The businesses targeted by the Company in its lending efforts are primarily those that require loans in the $100,000 to $8.0
million range. The Company offers these businesses a broad array of loan products including term loans, lines of credit and loans for
working capital, business expansion and the purchase of equipment and machinery, interim construction loans for builders and owner-
occupied commercial real estate loans. For its business customers, the Company has developed a specialized checking product called
Small Business Checking which provides fixed discounted fees for checking.
3
Business Strategies
The Company’s main objective is to increase deposits and loans internally, as well as through additional expansion
opportunities, while maintaining efficiency, individualized customer service and maximizing profitability. To achieve this objective,
the Company has employed the following strategic goals:
Continue Community Banking Emphasis. The Company intends to continue operating as a community banking organization
focused on meeting the specific needs of consumers and small and medium-sized businesses in its market areas. The Company will
continue to provide a high degree of responsiveness combined with a wide variety of banking products and services. The Company
staffs its Banking Centers with experienced bankers with lending expertise in the specific industries found in the community, giving
them authority to make certain pricing and credit decisions, thereby attempting to avoid the bureaucratic structure of larger banks.
Increase Loan Volume and Diversify Loan Portfolio. While maintaining its conservative approach to lending, the Company
has emphasized both new and existing loan products, focusing on growing its construction, commercial mortgage and commercial
loan portfolios. During the two-year period from December 31, 2002 to December 31, 2004, the Company’s construction loans grew
from $52.4 million to $109.6 million, or 109.2%. The Company’s commercial and industrial loans grew from $93.8 million to $144.4
million, or 54.0% and its commercial mortgages increased from $184.0 million to $369.2 million, or 100.7% for the same period. In
addition, the Company targets professional service firms such as legal and medical practices for both loans secured by owner-occupied
premises and personal loans to their principals.
Continue Strict Focus on Efficiency. The Company plans to maintain its stringent cost control practices and policies. The
Company has invested significantly in the infrastructure required to centralize many of its critical operations, such as data processing
and loan application processing. For its Banking Centers, which the Company operates as independent profit centers, the Company
supplies complete support in the areas of loan review, internal audit, compliance and training. Management believes that this
centralized infrastructure can accommodate substantial additional growth while enabling the Company to minimize operational costs
through certain economies of scale.
Enhance Cross-Selling. The Company recognizes that its customer base provides significant opportunities to cross-sell
various products and it seeks to develop broader customer relationships by identifying cross-selling opportunities. The Company uses
incentives and friendly competition to encourage cross-selling efforts and increase cross-selling results. Officers and associates have
access to each customer’s existing and related account relationships and are better able to inform customers of additional products
when customers visit or call the various Banking Centers or use their drive-in facilities. In addition, the Company includes product
information in monthly statements and other mailings.
Maintain Strong Asset Quality. The Company intends to maintain the strong asset quality that has been representative of its
historical loan portfolio. As the Company diversifies and increases its lending activities, it may face higher risks of nonpayment and
increased risks in the event of economic downturns. The Company intends, however, to continue to employ the strict underwriting
guidelines and comprehensive loan review process that has contributed to its low incidence of nonperforming assets and its minimal
charge-offs.
Expand Market Share Through Internal Growth and a Disciplined Acquisition Strategy. The Company intends to continue
seeking opportunities, both inside and outside its existing markets, to expand either by acquiring existing banks or branches of banks
or by establishing new Banking Centers. All of the Company's acquisitions have been accretive to earnings within 12 months after
acquisition date and have supplied the Company with relatively low-cost deposits which have been used to fund the Company's
lending and investing activities. However, the Company makes no guarantee that future acquisitions will be accretive to earnings
within any particular time period. Factors used by the Company to evaluate expansion opportunities include the similarity in
management and operating philosophies, whether the acquisition will be accretive to earnings and enhance shareholder value, the
ability to achieve economies of scale to improve the efficiency ratio and the opportunity to enhance the Company's market presence.
Competition
The banking business is highly competitive, and the profitability of the Company depends principally on its ability to
compete in its market areas. The Company competes with other commercial banks, savings banks, savings and loan associations,
credit unions, finance companies, mutual funds, insurance companies, brokerage and investment banking firms, asset-based nonbank
lenders and certain other nonfinancial entities, including retail stores which may maintain their own credit programs and certain
governmental organizations which may offer more favorable financing than the Company. The Company has been able to compete
effectively with other financial institutions by emphasizing customer service, technology and responsive decision-making with respect
to loans; by establishing long-term customer relationships and building customer loyalty; and by providing products and services
designed to address the specific needs of its customers.
4
Supervision and Regulation
The supervision and regulation of bank holding companies and their subsidiaries is intended primarily for the protection of
depositors, the deposit insurance funds of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) and the banking system as a whole,
and not for the protection of the bank holding company shareholders or creditors. The banking agencies have broad enforcement
power over bank holding companies and banks including the power to impose substantial fines and other penalties for violations of
laws and regulations.
The following description summarizes some of the laws to which the Company and the Bank are subject. References in this
annual report on Form 10-K to applicable statutes and regulations are brief summaries thereof, do not purport to be complete, and are
qualified in their entirety by reference to such statutes and regulations.
The Company
The Company is a financial holding company pursuant to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and a bank holding company
registered under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (“BHCA”). Accordingly, the Company is subject to
supervision, regulation and examination by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“Federal Reserve Board”). The
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, the BHCA and other federal laws subject financial and bank holding companies to particular restrictions on
the types of activities in which they may engage, and to a range of supervisory requirements and activities, including regulatory
enforcement actions for violations of laws and regulations.
Regulatory Restrictions on Dividends; Source of Strength. It is the policy of the Federal Reserve Board that bank holding
companies should pay cash dividends on common stock only out of income available over the past year and only if prospective
earnings retention is consistent with the organization's expected future needs and financial condition. The policy provides that bank
holding companies should not maintain a level of cash dividends that undermines the bank holding company's ability to serve as a
source of strength to its banking subsidiaries.
Under Federal Reserve Board policy, a bank holding company is expected to act as a source of financial strength to each of
its banking subsidiaries and commit resources to their support. Such support may be required at times when, absent this Federal
Reserve Board policy, a holding company may not be inclined to provide it. As discussed below, a bank holding company, in certain
circumstances, could be required to guarantee the capital plan of an undercapitalized banking subsidiary.
In the event of a bank holding company's bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, the trustee will be
deemed to have assumed and is required to cure immediately any deficit under any commitment by the debtor holding company to any
of the federal banking agencies to maintain the capital of an insured depository institution. Any claim for breach of such obligation
will generally have priority over most other unsecured claims.
Scope of Permissible Activities. Under the BHCA, bank holding companies generally may not acquire a direct or indirect
interest in or control of more than 5% of the voting shares of any company that is not a bank or bank holding company or from
engaging in activities other than those of banking, managing or controlling banks or furnishing services to or performing services for
its subsidiaries, except that it may engage in, directly or indirectly, certain activities that the Federal Reserve Board determined to be
closely related to banking or managing and controlling banks as to be a proper incident thereto. In approving acquisitions or the
addition of activities, the Federal Reserve considers whether the acquisition or the additional activities can reasonably be expected to
produce benefits to the public, such as greater convenience, increased competition, or gains in efficiency, that outweigh such possible
adverse effects as undue concentration of resources decreased or unfair competition, conflicts of interest or unsound banking practices.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, effective March 11, 2000, eliminated the barriers to affiliations
among banks, securities firms, insurance companies and other financial service providers and permits bank holding companies to
become financial holding companies and thereby affiliate with securities firms and insurance companies and engage in other activities
that are financial in nature. The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act defines “financial in nature” to include securities underwriting, dealing and
market making; sponsoring mutual funds and investment companies; insurance underwriting and agency; merchant banking activities;
and activities that the Federal Reserve Board has determined to be closely related to banking. No regulatory approval will be required
for a financial holding company to acquire a company, other than a bank or savings association, engaged in activities that are financial
in nature or incidental to activities that are financial in nature, as determined by the Federal Reserve Board.
Under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, a bank holding company may become a financial holding company by filing a
declaration with the Federal Reserve Board if each of its subsidiary banks is well capitalized under the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation Improvement Act (“FDICIA”) prompt corrective action provisions, is well managed, and has at least a satisfactory rating
under the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 (“CRA”). The Company became a financial holding company on April 18, 2000.
5
While the Federal Reserve Board is the “umbrella” regulator for financial holding companies and has the power to examine
banking organizations engaged in new activities, regulation and supervision of activities which are financial in nature or determined to
be incidental to such financial activities will be handled along functional lines. Accordingly, activities of subsidiaries of a financial
holding company will be regulated by the agency or authorities with the most experience regulating that activity as it is conducted in a
financial holding company.
Safe and Sound Banking Practices. Bank holding companies are not permitted to engage in unsafe and unsound banking
practices. The Federal Reserve Board's Regulation Y, for example, generally requires a holding company to give the Federal Reserve
Board prior notice of any redemption or repurchase of its own equity securities, if the consideration to be paid, together with the
consideration paid for any repurchases or redemptions in the preceding year, is equal to 10% or more of the company's consolidated
net worth. The Federal Reserve Board may oppose the transaction if it believes that the transaction would constitute an unsafe or
unsound practice or would violate any law or regulation. Depending upon the circumstances, the Federal Reserve Board could take the
position that paying a dividend would constitute an unsafe or unsound banking practice.
The Federal Reserve Board has broad authority to prohibit activities of bank holding companies and their nonbanking
subsidiaries which represent unsafe and unsound banking practices or which constitute violations of laws or regulations, and can
assess civil money penalties for certain activities conducted on a knowing and reckless basis, if those activities caused a substantial
loss to a depository institution. The penalties can be as high as $1.0 million for each day the activity continues.
Anti-Tying Restrictions. Bank holding companies and their affiliates are prohibited from tying the provision of certain
services, such as extensions of credit, to other services offered by a holding company or its affiliates.
Capital Adequacy Requirements. The Federal Reserve Board has adopted a system using risk-based capital guidelines to
evaluate the capital adequacy of bank holding companies. Under the guidelines, specific categories of assets are assigned different risk
weights, based generally on the perceived credit risk of the asset. These risk weights are multiplied by corresponding asset balances to
determine a "risk-weighted'' asset base. The guidelines require a minimum total risk-based capital ratio of 8.0% (of which at least
4.0% is required to consist of Tier 1 capital elements). Total capital is the sum of Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital. As of December 31, 2004,
the Company's ratio of Tier 1 capital to total tangible risk-weighted assets was 13.56% and its ratio of total capital to total tangible
risk-weighted assets was 14.67%. Tangible risk-weighted assets are calculated as total risk-weighted assets less intangible assets such
as goodwill and core deposit intangibles.
In addition to the risk-based capital guidelines, the Federal Reserve Board uses a leverage ratio as an additional tool to
evaluate the capital adequacy of bank holding companies. The leverage ratio is a company's Tier 1 capital divided by its average total
tangible consolidated assets. Certain highly rated bank holding companies may maintain a minimum leverage ratio of 3.0%, but other
bank holding companies are required to maintain a leverage ratio of 4.0%. As of December 31, 2004, the Company's leverage ratio
was 6.30%.
The federal banking agencies' risk-based and leverage ratios are minimum supervisory ratios generally applicable to banking
organizations that meet certain specified criteria, assuming that they have the highest regulatory rating. Banking organizations not
meeting these criteria are expected to operate with capital positions well above the minimum ratios. The federal bank regulatory
agencies may set capital requirements for a particular banking organization that are higher than the minimum ratios when
circumstances warrant. Federal Reserve Board guidelines also provide that banking organizations experiencing internal growth or
making acquisitions will be expected to maintain strong capital positions substantially above the minimum supervisory levels, without
significant reliance on intangible assets.
Imposition of Liability for Undercapitalized Subsidiaries. Bank regulators are required to take "prompt corrective action'' to
resolve problems associated with insured depository institutions whose capital declines below certain levels. In the event an institution
becomes “undercapitalized,” it must submit a capital restoration plan. The capital restoration plan will not be accepted by the
regulators unless each company having control of the undercapitalized institution guarantees the subsidiary's compliance with the
capital restoration plan up to a certain specified amount. Any such guarantee from a depository institution's holding company is
entitled to a priority of payment in bankruptcy.
The aggregate liability of the holding company of an undercapitalized bank is limited to the lesser of 5% of the institution's
assets at the time it became undercapitalized or the amount necessary to cause the institution to be “adequately capitalized.” The bank
regulators have greater power in situations where an institution becomes “significantly” or “critically” undercapitalized or fails to
submit a capital restoration plan. For example, a bank holding company controlling such an institution can be required to obtain prior
Federal Reserve Board approval of proposed dividends, or might be required to consent to a consolidation or to divest the troubled
institution or other affiliates.
6
Acquisitions by Bank Holding Companies. The BHCA requires every bank holding company to obtain the prior approval of
the Federal Reserve Board before it may acquire all or substantially all of the assets of any bank, or ownership or control of any voting
shares of any bank, if after such acquisition it would own or control, directly or indirectly, more than 5% of the voting shares of such
bank. In approving bank acquisitions by bank holding companies, the Federal Reserve Board is required to consider the financial and
managerial resources and future prospects of the bank holding company and the banks concerned, the convenience and needs of the
communities to be served, and various competitive factors.
Control Acquisitions. The Change in Bank Control Act prohibits a person or group of persons from acquiring "control'' of a
bank holding company unless the Federal Reserve Board has been notified and has not objected to the transaction. Under a rebuttable
presumption established by the Federal Reserve Board, the acquisition of 10% or more of a class of voting stock of a bank holding
company with a class of securities registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act, such as the Company, would, under the
circumstances set forth in the presumption, constitute acquisition of control of the Company.
In addition, any entity is required to obtain the approval of the Federal Reserve Board under the BHCA before acquiring 25%
(5% in the case of an acquirer that is a bank holding company) or more of the outstanding Common Stock of the Company, or
otherwise obtaining control or a “controlling influence” over the Company.
The Bank
The Bank is a Texas-chartered banking association, the deposits of which are insured by the Bank Insurance Fund (“BIF”) of
the FDIC. The Bank is not a member of the Federal Reserve System; therefore, the Bank is subject to supervision and regulation by
the FDIC and the Texas Banking Department. Such supervision and regulation subject the Bank to special restrictions, requirements,
potential enforcement actions and periodic examination by the FDIC and the Texas Banking Department. Because the Federal Reserve
Board regulates the bank holding company parent of the Bank, the Federal Reserve Board also has supervisory authority which
directly affects the Bank.
Equivalence to National Bank Powers. The Texas Constitution, as amended in 1986, provides that a Texas-chartered bank
has the same rights and privileges that are or may be granted to national banks domiciled in Texas. To the extent that the Texas laws
and regulations may have allowed state-chartered banks to engage in a broader range of activities than national banks, the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (“FDICIA”) has operated to limit this authority. FDICIA provides that no
state bank or subsidiary thereof may engage as principal in any activity not permitted for national banks, unless the institution
complies with applicable capital requirements and the FDIC determines that the activity poses no significant risk to the insurance
fund. In general, statutory restrictions on the activities of banks are aimed at protecting the safety and soundness of depository
institutions.
Financial Modernization. Under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, a national bank may establish a financial subsidiary and
engage, subject to limitations on investment, in activities that are financial in nature, other than insurance underwriting as principal,
insurance company portfolio investment, real estate development, real estate investment and annuity issuance. To do so, a bank must
be well capitalized, well managed and have a CRA rating of satisfactory or better. Subsidiary banks of a financial holding company or
national banks with financial subsidiaries must remain well capitalized and well managed in order to continue to engage in activities
that are financial in nature without regulatory actions or restrictions, which could include divestiture of the financial in nature
subsidiary or subsidiaries. In addition, a financial holding company or a bank may not acquire a company that is engaged in activities
that are financial in nature unless each of the subsidiary banks of the financial holding company or the bank has a CRA rating of
satisfactory of better.
Although the powers of state chartered banks are not specifically addressed in the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, Texas-chartered
banks such as the Bank, will have the same if not greater powers as national banks through the parity provision contained in the Texas
Constitution.
Branching. Texas law provides that a Texas-chartered bank can establish a branch anywhere in Texas provided that the
branch is approved in advance by the Texas Banking Department. The branch must also be approved by the FDIC, which considers a
number of factors, including financial history, capital adequacy, earnings prospects, character of management, needs of the
community and consistency with corporate powers.
Restrictions on Transactions with Affiliates and Insiders. Transactions between the Bank and its nonbanking subsidiaries,
including the Company, are subject to Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act. In general, Section 23A imposes limits on the amount
of such transactions, and also requires certain levels of collateral for loans to affiliated parties. It also limits the amount of advances to
third parties which are collateralized by the securities or obligations of the Company or its subsidiaries.
7
Affiliate transactions are also subject to Section 23B of the Federal Reserve Act which generally requires that certain
transactions between the Bank and its affiliates be on terms substantially the same, or at least as favorable to the Bank, as those
prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with or involving other nonaffiliated persons. The Federal Reserve has also issued
Regulation W which codifies prior regulations under Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act and interpretive guidance with
respect to affiliate transactions.
The restrictions on loans to directors, executive officers, principal shareholders and their related interests (collectively
referred to herein as "insiders'') contained in the Federal Reserve Act and Regulation O apply to all insured institutions and their
subsidiaries and holding companies. These restrictions include limits on loans to one borrower and conditions that must be met before
such a loan can be made. There is also an aggregate limitation on all loans to insiders and their related interests. These loans cannot
exceed the institution's total unimpaired capital and surplus, and the FDIC may determine that a lesser amount is appropriate. Insiders
are subject to enforcement actions for knowingly accepting loans in violation of applicable restrictions.
Restrictions on Distribution of Subsidiary Bank Dividends and Assets. Dividends paid by the Bank have provided a
substantial part of the Company's operating funds and for the foreseeable future it is anticipated that dividends paid by the Bank to the
Company will continue to be the Company's principal source of operating funds. Capital adequacy requirements serve to limit the
amount of dividends that may be paid by the Bank. Under federal law, the Bank cannot pay a dividend if, after paying the dividend,
the Bank will be “undercapitalized.” The FDIC may declare a dividend payment to be unsafe and unsound even though the Bank
would continue to meet its capital requirements after the dividend. Because the Company is a legal entity separate and distinct from
its subsidiaries, its right to participate in the distribution of assets of any subsidiary upon the subsidiary's liquidation or reorganization
will be subject to the prior claims of the subsidiary's creditors. In the event of a liquidation or other resolution of an insured
depository institution, the claims of depositors and other general or subordinated creditors are entitled to a priority of payment over
the claims of holders of any obligation of the institution to its shareholders, including any depository institution holding company
(such as the Company) or any shareholder or creditor thereof.
Examinations. The FDIC periodically examines and evaluates insured banks. Based on such an evaluation, the FDIC may
revalue the assets of the institution and require that it establish specific reserves to compensate for the difference between the FDIC-
determined value and the book value of such assets. The Texas Banking Department also conducts examinations of state banks but
may accept the results of a federal examination in lieu of conducting an independent examination.
Audit Reports. Insured institutions with total assets of $500 million or more must submit annual audit reports prepared by
independent auditors to federal and state regulators. In some instances, the audit report of the institution's holding company can be
used to satisfy this requirement. Auditors must receive examination reports, supervisory agreements and reports of enforcement
actions. In addition, financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, management's
certifications concerning responsibility for the financial statements, internal controls and compliance with legal requirements
designated by the FDIC, and an attestation by the auditor regarding the statements of management relating to the internal controls
must be submitted. For institutions with total assets of more than $3 billion, independent auditors may be required to review quarterly
financial statements. FDICIA requires that independent audit committees be formed, consisting of outside directors only. The
committees of such institutions must include members with experience in banking or financial management, must have access to
outside counsel, and must not include representatives of large customers.
Capital Adequacy Requirements. The FDIC has adopted regulations establishing minimum requirements for the capital
adequacy of insured institutions. The FDIC may establish higher minimum requirements if, for example, a bank has previously
received special attention or has a high susceptibility to interest rate risk.
The FDIC's risk-based capital guidelines generally require state banks to have a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to total
tangible risk-weighted assets of 4.0% and a ratio of total capital to total tangible risk-weighted assets of 8.0%. The capital categories
have the same definitions for the Bank as for the Company. As of December 31, 2004, the Bank's ratio of Tier 1 capital to total
tangible risk-weighted assets was 13.09% and its ratio of total capital to total tangible risk-weighted assets was 14.20%.
The FDIC's leverage guidelines require state banks to maintain Tier 1 capital of no less than 4.0% of average total tangible
assets, except in the case of certain highly rated banks for which the requirement is 3.0% of average total assets. The Texas Banking
Department has issued a policy which generally requires state chartered banks to maintain a leverage ratio (defined in accordance with
federal capital guidelines) of 5.0%. As of December 31, 2004, the Bank's ratio of Tier 1 capital to average total assets (leverage ratio)
was 6.07%.
Corrective Measures for Capital Deficiencies. The federal banking regulators are required to take "prompt corrective action''
with respect to capital-deficient institutions. Agency regulations define, for each capital category, the levels at which institutions are
"well capitalized,” “adequately capitalized,” “under capitalized,” “significantly under capitalized” and “critically under capitalized.” A
8
“well capitalized” bank has a total risk-based capital ratio of 10.0% or higher; a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6.0% or higher; a
leverage ratio of 5.0% or higher; and is not subject to any written agreement, order or directive requiring it to maintain a specific
capital level for any capital measure. An “adequately capitalized” bank has a total risk-based capital ratio of 8.0% or higher; a Tier 1
risk-based capital ratio of 4.0% or higher; a leverage ratio of 4.0% or higher (3.0% or higher if the bank was rated a composite 1 in its
most recent examination report and is not experiencing significant growth); and does not meet the criteria for a well capitalized bank.
A bank is “under capitalized” if it fails to meet any one of the ratios required to be adequately capitalized. The Bank is classified as
“well capitalized” for purposes of the FDIC’s prompt corrective action regulations.
In addition to requiring undercapitalized institutions to submit a capital restoration plan, agency regulations contain broad
restrictions on certain activities of undercapitalized institutions including asset growth, acquisitions, branch establishment and
expansion into new lines of business. With certain exceptions, an insured depository institution is prohibited from making capital
distributions, including dividends, and is prohibited from paying management fees to control persons if the institution would be
undercapitalized after any such distribution or payment.
As an institution's capital decreases, the FDIC's enforcement powers become more severe. A significantly undercapitalized
institution is subject to mandated capital raising activities, restrictions on interest rates paid and transactions with affiliates, removal of
management and other restrictions. The FDIC has only very limited discretion in dealing with a critically undercapitalized institution
and is virtually required to appoint a receiver or conservator.
Banks with risk-based capital and leverage ratios below the required minimums may also be subject to certain administrative
actions, including the termination of deposit insurance upon notice and hearing, or a temporary suspension of insurance without a
hearing in the event the institution has no tangible capital.
Deposit Insurance Assessments. The Bank must pay assessments to the FDIC for federal deposit insurance protection. The
FDIC has adopted a risk-based assessment system as required by FDICIA. Under this system, FDIC-insured depository institutions
pay insurance premiums at rates based on their risk classification. Institutions assigned to higher risk classifications (that is,
institutions that pose a greater risk of loss to their respective deposit insurance funds) pay assessments at higher rates than institutions
that pose a lower risk. An institution's risk classification is assigned based on its capital levels and the level of supervisory concern the
institution poses to the regulators. In addition, the FDIC can impose special assessments in certain instances. The current range of BIF
assessments is between 0% and 0.27% of deposits.
The FDIC established a process for raising or lowering all rates for insured institutions semi-annually if conditions warrant a
change. Under this system, the FDIC has the flexibility to adjust the assessment rate schedule twice a year without seeking prior
public comment, but only within a range of five cents per $100 above or below the premium schedule adopted. Changes in the rate
schedule outside the five cent range above or below the current schedule can be made by the FDIC only after a full rulemaking with
opportunity for public comment.
In addition to BIF assessments, banks insured under the BIF are required to pay a portion of the interest due on bonds that
were issued by the Financing Corporation (“FICO”) to help shore up the ailing Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation in
1987. With regard to the assessment for the FICO obligation, for the fourth quarter 2004, the BIF rate was .00146% of deposits.
Enforcement Powers. The FDIC and the other federal banking agencies have broad enforcement powers, including the power
to terminate deposit insurance, impose substantial fines and other civil and criminal penalties and appoint a conservator or receiver.
Failure to comply with applicable laws, regulations and supervisory agreements could subject the Company or its banking
subsidiaries, as well as officers, directors and other institution-affiliated parties of these organizations, to administrative sanctions and
potentially substantial civil money penalties. The appropriate federal banking agency may appoint the FDIC as conservator or receiver
for a banking institution (or the FDIC may appoint itself, under certain circumstances) if any one or more of a number of
circumstances exist, including, without limitation, the fact that the banking institution is undercapitalized and has no reasonable
prospect of becoming adequately capitalized; fails to become adequately capitalized when required to do so; fails to submit a timely
and acceptable capital restoration plan; or materially fails to implement an accepted capital restoration plan. The Texas Banking
Department also has broad enforcement powers over the Bank, including the power to impose orders, remove officers and directors,
impose fines and appoint supervisors and conservators.
Brokered Deposit Restrictions. Adequately capitalized institutions cannot accept, renew or roll over brokered deposits except
with a waiver from the FDIC, and are subject to restrictions on the interest rates that can be paid on such deposits. Undercapitalized
institutions may not accept, renew, or roll over brokered deposits.
9
Cross-Guarantee Provisions. The Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989 (“FIRREA”)
contains a “cross-guarantee” provision which generally makes commonly controlled insured depository institutions liable to the FDIC
for any losses incurred in connection with the failure of a commonly controlled depository institution.
Community Reinvestment Act. The CRA and the regulations issued thereunder are intended to encourage banks to help meet
the credit needs of their service area, including low and moderate income neighborhoods, consistent with the safe and sound
operations of the banks. These regulations also provide for regulatory assessment of a bank's record in meeting the needs of its service
area when considering applications to establish branches, merger applications and applications to acquire the assets and assume the
liabilities of another bank. FIRREA requires federal banking agencies to make public a rating of a bank's performance under the
CRA. In the case of a bank holding company, the CRA performance record of the banks involved in the transaction are reviewed in
connection with the filing of an application to acquire ownership or control of shares or assets of a bank or to merge with any other
bank holding company. An unsatisfactory record can substantially delay or block the transaction.
Consumer Laws and Regulations. In addition to the laws and regulations discussed herein, the Bank is also subject to certain
consumer laws and regulations that are designed to protect consumers in transactions with banks. While the list set forth herein is not
exhaustive, these laws and regulations include the Truth in Lending Act, the Truth in Savings Act, the Electronic Funds Transfer Act,
the Expedited Funds Availability Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, and the Fair Housing Act, among others. These laws and
regulations mandate certain disclosure requirements and regulate the manner in which financial institutions must deal with customers
when taking deposits or making loans to such customers. The Bank must comply with the applicable provisions of these consumer
protection laws and regulations as part of their ongoing customer relations.
The USA Patriot Act of 2001. The Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept
and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 ("USA Patriot Act") was enacted in October 2001. The USA Patriot Act is intended to strengthen
U.S. law enforcement's and the intelligence communities' ability to work cohesively to combat terrorism on a variety of fronts. The
potential impact of the USA Patriot Act on financial institutions of all kinds is significant and wide ranging. The USA Patriot Act
contains sweeping anti-money laundering and financial transparency laws and requires various regulations, including: (i) due diligence
requirements for financial institutions that administer, maintain, or manage private bank accounts or correspondent accounts for non-
U.S. persons; (ii) standards for verifying customer identification at account opening; (iii) rules to promote cooperation among
financial institutions, regulators and law enforcement entities in identifying parties that may be involved in terrorism or money
laundering; (iv) reports by nonfinancial trades and business filed with the Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement
Network for transactions exceeding $10,000; and (v) filing of suspicious activities reports involving securities by brokers and dealers
if they believe a customer may be violating U.S. laws and regulations.
Privacy. In addition to expanding the activities in which banks and bank holding companies may engage, the Gramm-Leach-
Bliley Act also imposed new requirements on financial institutions with respect to customer privacy. The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act
generally prohibits disclosure of customer information to non-affiliated third parties unless the customer has been given the
opportunity to object and has not objected to such disclosure. Financial institutions are further required to disclose their privacy
policies to customers annually. Financial institutions, however, will be required to comply with state law if it is more protective of
customer privacy than the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act.
Instability of Regulatory Structure
Various legislation, such as the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act which expanded the powers of banking institutions and bank
holding companies, and proposals to overhaul the bank regulatory system and limit the investments that a depository institution may
make with insured funds, is from time to time introduced in Congress. Such legislation may change banking statutes and the operating
environment of the Company and its banking subsidiaries in substantial and unpredictable ways. The Company cannot determine the
ultimate effect that any potential legislation, if enacted, or implemented regulations with respect thereto, would have, upon the
financial condition or results of operations of the Company or its subsidiaries.
10
Expanding Enforcement Authority
One of the major additional burdens imposed on the banking industry by FDICIA is the increased ability of banking
regulators to monitor the activities of banks and their holding companies. In addition, the Federal Reserve Board and FDIC possess
extensive authority to police unsafe or unsound practices and violations of applicable laws and regulations by depository institutions
and their holding companies. For example, the FDIC may terminate the deposit insurance of any institution which it determines has
engaged in an unsafe or unsound practice. The agencies can also assess civil money penalties, issue cease and desist or removal
orders, seek injunctions, and publicly disclose such actions. FDICIA, FIRREA and other laws have expanded the agencies' authority
in recent years, and the agencies have not yet fully tested the limits of their powers.
Effect on Economic Environment
The policies of regulatory authorities, including the monetary policy of the Federal Reserve Board, have a significant effect
on the operating results of bank holding companies and their subsidiaries. Among the means available to the Federal Reserve Board to
affect the money supply are open market operations in U.S. government securities, changes in the discount rate on member bank
borrowings, and changes in reserve requirements against member bank deposits. These means are used in varying combinations to
influence overall growth and distribution of bank loans, investments and deposits, and their use may affect interest rates charged on
loans or paid for deposits.
Federal Reserve Board monetary policies have materially affected the operating results of commercial banks in the past and
are expected to continue to do so in the future. The nature of future monetary policies and the effect of such policies on the business
and earnings of the Company and its subsidiaries cannot be predicted.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
As of December 31, 2004, the Company conducted business at 58 full-service banking centers. The Company’s headquarters
are located at Prosperity Bank Plaza, 4295 San Felipe, in the Galleria area in Houston, Texas. The Company owns all of the buildings
in which its banking centers are located other than those listed below. The expiration dates of the leases listed below do not include
renewal option periods which may be available.
Banking Center
Expiration Date of Lease
Abrams Centre.........................................
Bellaire ....................................................
City West .................................................
Congress ..................................................
Congress Drive-thru.................................
Copperfield ..............................................
Downtown ...............................................
Fairfield ...................................................
Galveston.................................................
Gladebrook ..............................................
Medical Center ........................................
Oak Hill ...................................................
Post Oak...................................................
Preston Road............................................
River Oaks ...............................................
Riverside..................................................
Waugh Drive............................................
William Canon.........................................
December 2008
October 2007
January 2009
August 2014
April 2005
January 2006
October 2012
May 2008
November 2010
October 2010
March 2008
May 2005
June 2007
September 2013
December 2009
July 2018
February 2011
November 2009
11
The following table sets forth specific information on each of the Company’s locations:
Location
Address
Deposits at December 31, 2004
(Dollars in thousands)
Abrams Centre
Aldine
Allandale
Angleton
Bay City
Beeville
Bellaire
Blooming Grove
Camp Wisdom
Cedar Hill
CityWest
Clear Lake
Cleveland
Congress
Copperfield
Corsicana
$ 35,164
18,478
13,520
56,964
81,277
75,150
36,024
12,142
25,439
39,996
17,403
52,911
107,020
97,704
11,682
20,731
9330 LBJ Freeway
Dallas, TX 75243
1906 Aldine Bender
Houston, TX 77032
1610 West North Loop
Austin, TX 78756
116 South Velasco
Angleton, TX 77516
1600 Seventh St.
Bay City, TX 77404
(includes drive-thru located approximately
¼ mile from main office)
100 South Washington
Beeville, TX 78102
6800 West Loop South Suite 100
Bellaire, TX 77401
109 South Fordyce Street
Blooming Grove, TX 76626
3515 West Camp Wisdom Road
Dallas, TX 75237
217 East FM 1382
Cedar Hill, TX 75104
2500 CityWest Blvd.
Houston, TX 77042
100 West Medical Center Blvd.
Webster, TX 77598
104 West Crockett
Cleveland, TX 77237
900 Congress Avenue
Austin, TX 78701
(includes drive-thru located approximately
¼ mile from main office)
8686 Highway 6 North
Houston, TX 77095
100 South Main Street
Corsicana, TX 75110
12
Location
Address
Deposits at December 31, 2004
(Dollars in thousands)
Cuero
Cypress
Dayton
Downtown
East Bernard
Edna
El Campo (Bank headquarters)
Ennis
Fairfield
Galveston
Gladebrook
Goliad
Highway 6-West
Hitchcock
Kiest
Lakeway
Liberty
$ 34,977
36,706
59,585
13,503
56,389
66,974
105,138
38,053
7,758
7,926
23,647
15,489
8,512
10,049
46,123
84,059
56,819
106 North Esplanade
Cuero, TX 77954
25820 U.S. 290
Cypress, TX 77429
106 North Main
Dayton, TX 77535
777 Walker, Suite L140
Houston, TX 77002
700 Church St.
East Bernard, TX 77435
102 North Wells
Edna, TX 77962
1301 North Mechanic
El Campo, TX 77437
207 South Clay
Ennis, TX 75119
15050 Fairfield Village Square Dr.
Cypress, TX 77433
2424 Market St.
Galveston, TX 77550
3934 FM 1960 West, Suite 100
Houston, TX 77068
145 North Jefferson
Goliad, TX 77963
1070 Highway 6 South
Houston, TX 77077
8300 Highway 6
Hitchcock, TX 77563
333 West Kiest Boulevard
Dallas, TX 75224
1415 Ranch Road 620 South
Lakeway, TX 78734
520 Main St.
Liberty, TX 77575
13
Location
Magnolia
Mathis
Medical Center
Memorial
Mont Belvieu
Needville
Oak Hill
Palacios
Post Oak
Preston Road
Red Oak
Research
River Oaks (Company headquarters)
Riverside
Sweeny
Tanglewood
Turtle Creek
Address
Deposits at December 31, 2004
(Dollars in thousands)
$ 30,697
32,146
27,524
22,503
13,654
24,880
16,587
24,075
104,814
15,152
54,587
9,026
143,104
3,528
12,008
13,204
23,468
18935 FM 1488
Magnolia, TX 77355
103 North Highway 359
Mathis, TX 78368
7505 South Main St., Suite 100
Houston, TX 77030
12602 Memorial Drive
Houston, TX 77024
10305 Eagle Drive
Mont Belvieu, TX 77580
13325 Highway 36
Needville, TX 77461
6132 Hwy 290 West
Austin, TX 78735
600 Henderson
Palacios, TX 77465
3040 Post Oak Blvd. Suite 150
Houston, TX 77056
18800 Preston Road
Dallas, TX 75252
500 North I-35 Service Road
Red Oak, TX 75154
8770 Research Blvd.
Austin, TX 78758
4295 San Felipe
Houston, TX 77027
1708 South Lakeshore Blvd.
Austin, TX 78741
206 North McKinney
Sweeny, TX 77480
5707 Woodway
Houston, TX 77057
3802 Oak Lawn Avenue
Dallas, TX 75219
14
Location
Address
Deposits at December 31, 2004
(Dollars in thousands)
Victoria
Waugh Drive
West Columbia
Westmoreland
Wharton
William Cannon
Winnie
Woodcreek
2702 North Navarro
Victoria, TX 77901
55 Waugh Drive
Houston, TX 77007
510 East Brazos
West Columbia, TX 77486
2415 South Westmoreland Rd.
Dallas, TX 75211
143 West Burleson
Wharton, TX 77488
1901 William Cannon
Austin, TX 78745
146 Spur 5
Winnie, TX 77665
2828 FM 1960 East
Houston, TX 77073
$ 58,334
48,981
48,906
61,125
76,180
2,544
11,897
64,839
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Neither the Company nor the Bank is currently a party to any material legal proceeding.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of 2004.
15
PART II.
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
The Company’s Common Stock began trading on November 12, 1998 and is listed on the Nasdaq National Market System
under the symbol “PRSP”. Prior to that date, the Common Stock was privately held and not listed on any public exchange or actively
traded. As of March 1, 2005, there were 27,471,396 shares outstanding and 1,020 shareholders of record. The number of beneficial
owners is unknown to the Company at this time.
The following table presents the high and low sales prices for the Common Stock reported on the Nasdaq National Market
during the two years ended December 31, 2004:
2004
Fourth Quarter .......................................
Third Quarter .........................................
Second Quarter ......................................
First Quarter...........................................
2003
Fourth Quarter .......................................
Third Quarter .........................................
Second Quarter ......................................
First Quarter...........................................
Dividends
High
$ 29.53
27.75
24.60
25.15
High
$ 24.35
22.99
19.90
19.84
Low
$ 26.09
23.23
21.89
22.30
Low
$ 20.75
18.65
16.16
16.30
Holders of Common Stock are entitled to receive dividends when, as and if declared by the Company’s Board of Directors
out of funds legally available therefor. While the Company has declared dividends on its Common Stock since 1994, and paid
quarterly dividends aggregating $0.3075 per share in 2004 and $0.25 per share in 2003, there is no assurance that the Company will
continue to pay dividends in the future.
The principal source of cash revenues to the Company is dividends paid by the Bank with respect to the Bank’s capital stock.
There are certain restrictions on the payment of such dividends imposed by federal and state banking laws, regulations and authorities.
Under federal law, the Bank cannot pay a dividend if it will cause the Bank to be "undercapitalized." The Bank is also subject to risk-
based capital rules that restrict its ability to pay dividends. The risk-based capital rules set a specific schedule for achieving minimum
capital levels in relation to risk-weighted assets. Regulatory authorities can impose stricter limitations on the ability of the Bank to
pay dividends if they consider the payment to be an unsafe or unsound practice.
The cash dividends declared per share by quarter (and paid on the first business day of the subsequent quarter) for the
Company’s last two fiscal years were as follows:
2004
2003
Fourth quarter .................................................
$0.0825
$0.0625
Third quarter....................................................
0.0750
Second quarter ................................................
0.0750
First quarter.....................................................
0.0750
0.0625
0.0625
0.0625
16
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
None.
Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans
As of December 31, 2004, the Company had two stock option plans, both of which were approved by the Company's
shareholders. In December 2004, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive
Plan (“2004 Plan”), which authorizes the issuance of up to 1,250,000 shares of Common Stock, subject to shareholder approval. The
Company’s shareholders approved the 2004 Plan at a special meeting of shareholders on February 23, 2005. The following table
provides information as of December 31, 2004 regarding the Company's equity compensation plans under which the Company’s
equity securities are authorized for issuance, other than the 2004 Plan:
Plan category
Equity compensation plans
approved by security holders..........
Equity compensation plans not
approved by security holders..........
Number of securities to
be issued upon exercise
of outstanding options,
warrants and rights
(a)
Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options
(b)
918,409(1)
$
19.64
--
--
Total ........................................
918,409
$
19.64
______________________________
Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation
plans (excluding
securities reflected
in column (a))
(c)
136,500
--
136,500
(1) Includes (a) 14,782 shares which may be issued upon exercise of options outstanding assumed by the Company in connection with
the acquisition of Paradigm Bancorporation, Inc. at a weighted average exercise price of $10.65 and (b) 31,127 shares which may be
issued upon exercise of options outstanding assumed by the Company in connection with the acquisition of MainBancorp, Inc. at a
weighted average exercise price of $16.26.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
None.
17
ITEM 6. SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected consolidated financial data for, and as of the end of, each of the years in the five-year period ended
December 31, 2004 are derived from and should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements and the
notes thereto and the information contained in “Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.” The consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 and for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2004 and the report thereon of Deloitte & Touche LLP are included elsewhere in this document. The
historical financial data of the Company has been restated to include the accounts and operations of Commercial Bancshares, Inc. for
all periods prior to February 23, 2001. All per share data for 2002 and prior years has been restated to include the two-for-one stock
split effective May 31, 2002.
2004
As of and for the Years Ended December 31,
2002
2001
2003
2000
Income Statement Data:
Interest income .....................................................
Interest expense ....................................................
Net interest income ..........................................
Provision for credit losses.....................................
Net interest income after provision
for credit losses .............................................
Noninterest income...............................................
Noninterest expense..............................................
Income before taxes..........................................
Provision for income taxes ...................................
Net income ...........................................................
Per Share Data(2):
Basic earnings per share .......................................
Diluted earnings per share ....................................
Book value per share ............................................
Cash dividends declared. ......................................
Dividend payout ratio ...........................................
Weighted average shares outstanding (basic)
(in thousands). ..................................................
Weighted average shares outstanding (diluted)
(in thousands). ..................................................
Shares outstanding at end of period
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
$ 111,756
29,789
81,967
880
$ 90,845
26,346
64,499
483
$ 80,742
28,101
52,641
1,010
$ 76,520
37,410
39,110
700
$ 70,079
36,751
33,328
275
81,087
23,071
51,707
52,451
17,744
$ 34,707
64,016
16,966
42,021
38,961
12,413
$ 26,548
38,410
8,635
51,631
11,594
32,349 28,715 (1)
18,330 (1)
30,876
9,555 5,372 (1)
33,053
7,796
25,616
15,233
4,532
$ 21,321 $ 12,958 (1) $ 10,701
$
1.61
1.59
12.32
0.31
19.22%
$
1.38
1.36
10.49
.25
$ 1.25 $ 0.80 (3)
0.79 (3)
5.47
0.195
1.22
8.19
0.22
18.29%
18.13%
24.39%
$ 0.67
0.65
4.98
0.18
25.75%
21,534
19,225
17, 122
16,172
16,064
21,804
19,536
17, 442
16,498
16,454
(in thousands). ..................................................
22,381
20,930
18, 896
16,210
16,144
Balance Sheet Data (at period end):
Total assets ...........................................................
Securities ..............................................................
Loans ....................................................................
Allowance for credit losses...................................
Total intangibles ...................................................
Total deposits .......................................................
Borrowings and notes payable..............................
Total shareholders' equity.....................................
Junior subordinated debentures ............................
Average Balance Sheet Data:
Total assets ...........................................................
Securities ..............................................................
Loans ....................................................................
Allowance for credit losses...................................
Total goodwill and intangibles .............................
Total deposits .......................................................
Total shareholders' equity.....................................
Junior subordinated debentures ............................
$2,697,228
1,302,792
1,035,513
13,105
164,672
2,317,076
38,174
275,647
47,424(4)
$2,400,487
1,376,880
770,053
10,345
124,755
2,083,748
30,936
219,588
59,804
$1,823,286
950,317
679,559
9, 580
72,410
1,586,611
37,939
154,739
34,030
$1, 263,169 $1,146,520
586,952
411,203
5,523
24,003
1,033,546
13,931
80,333
12,380
752,322
424,400
5,985
22,641
1,123,397
18,080
88,725
27,844
$2,543,088
1,383,790
871,736
11,454
139,405
2,189,695
243,274
59,288(5)
$2,006,869
1,108,153
697,235
9,525
81,485
1,749,045
170,167
39,400
$1,470,758
818,362
524,885
7,350
38,531
1,300,884
114,234
29,648
$1,191,783
666,241
419,553
5,586
22,807
1,061,195
85,319
19,468
$1,046,262
550,431
383,054
5,245
20,292
920,526
72,952
12,380
(Table continued on next page)
18
Performance Ratios:
Return on average assets...................................
Return on average equity..................................
Net interest margin ...........................................
Efficiency ratio (7) .............................................
Asset Quality Ratios (8):
Nonperforming assets to total loans and
other real estate. ............................................
Net loan charge-offs (recoveries)
to average loans .............................................
Allowance for credit losses to total
loans..............................................................
Allowance for credit losses to
nonperforming loans (9) .................................
Capital Ratios(8):
Leverage ratio...................................................
Average shareholders' equity to average
total assets.....................................................
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio. ..........................
Total risk-based capital ratio ............................
__________________
2004
As of and for the Years Ended December 31,
2003
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
2002
2001
2000
1.36%
14.27
3.56
49.23
1.32%
15.60
3.52
51.58
1.45%
1.09% (6)
15.19 (6)
18.66
3.86
50.36 60.14 (6)
3.50
1.02%
14.67
3.43
62.29
0.17%
0.13%
0.38% 0.00%
0.32%
0.06
0.23
0.08 0.06
(0.04)
1.27
1.34
1. 41
1.41
1.34
949.6
1,519.1
408.53
n/m(10)
700.89
6.30%
7.10%
6.56%
7.57%
6.17%
9.57
13.56
14.67
8.48
15.82
16.90
7.77
14.10
15.30
7.16
18.34
19.52
6.98
13.80
14.93
(1) Certain income statement data for the year ended December 31, 2001 includes merger-related expenses of $2.4 million, net of tax., incurred in
connection with the Commercial merger.
(2) Adjusted for a two-for one stock split effective May 31, 2002.
(3) Earnings per share amounts for the year ended December 31, 2001 include merger-related expenses of $2.4 million.
(4) Consists $15.5 million of junior subordinated debentures of Prosperity Statutory Trust II due July 31, 2031, $6.2 million of junior
subordinated debentures of Paradigm Capital Trust II due February 20, 2031, $12.9 million of junior subordinated debentures of Prosperity
Statutory Trust III due September 17, 2033 and $12.9 million of junior subordinated debentures of Prosperity Statutory Trust IV due
December 30, 2033.
(5) Consists of $12.4 million of junior subordinated debentures of Prosperity Capital Trust I due November 12, 2029 (fully redeemed on
December 31, 2004), $15.5 million of junior subordinated debentures of Prosperity Statutory Trust II due July 31, 2031, $6.2 million of junior
subordinated debentures of Paradigm Capital Trust II due February 20, 2031, $12.9 million of junior subordinated debentures of Prosperity
Statutory Trust III due September 17, 2033 and $12.9 million of junior subordinated debentures of Prosperity Statutory Trust IV due
December 30, 2033.
(6) Selected performance ratios for the year ended December 31, 2001 include the merger-related expenses of $2.4 million.
(7) Calculated by dividing total noninterest expense, excluding securities losses and credit loss provisions, by net interest income plus noninterest
income, excluding securities gains. Additionally, taxes are not part of this calculation.
(8) At period end, except for net loan charge-offs to average loans and average shareholders' equity to average total assets, which is for periods
ended at such dates.
(9) Nonperforming loans consist of nonaccrual loans, loans contractually past due 90 days or more, restructured loans and any other loan
management deems to be nonperforming.
(10) Amount not meaningful. Nonperforming assets totaled $1,000 at December 31, 2001.
19
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
Special Cautionary Notice Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Statements and financial discussion and analysis contained in this annual report on Form 10-K that are not historical facts are
forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Forward-looking statements are based on assumptions and involve a number of risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the
Company’s control. Many possible events or factors could affect the future financial results and performance of the Company and
could cause such results or performance to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements. These possible
events or factors include, without limitation:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
changes in interest rates and market prices, which could reduce the Company’s net interest margins, asset valuations and expense
expectations;
changes in the levels of loan prepayments and the resulting effects on the value of the Company’s loan portfolio;
changes in local economic and business conditions which adversely affect the Company’s customers and their ability to transact
profitable business with the company, including the ability of the Company’s borrowers to repay their loans according to their
terms or a change in the value of the related collateral;
increased competition for deposits and loans adversely affecting rates and terms;
the timing, impact and other uncertainties of future acquisitions, including the Company’s ability to identify suitable future
acquisition candidates, the success or failure in the integration of their operations, and the ability to enter new markets
successfully and capitalize on growth opportunities;
increased credit risk in the Company’s assets and increased operating risk caused by a material change in commercial, consumer
and/or real estate loans as a percentage of the total loan portfolio;
the failure of assumptions underlying the establishment of and provisions made to the allowance for credit losses;
changes in the availability of funds resulting in increased costs or reduced liquidity;
increased asset levels and changes in the composition of assets and the resulting impact on the Company’s capital levels and
regulatory capital ratios;
the Company’s ability to acquire, operate and maintain cost effective and efficient systems without incurring unexpectedly
difficult or expensive but necessary technological changes;
the loss of senior management or operating personnel and the potential inability to hire qualified personnel at reasonable
compensation levels;
changes in statutes and government regulations or their interpretations applicable to financial holding companies and the
Company’s present and future banking and other subsidiaries, including changes in tax requirements and tax rates;
acts of terrorism, an outbreak of hostilities or other international or domestic calamities, weather or other acts of God and other
matters beyond the Company’s control; and
other risks and uncertainties listed from time to time in the Company’s reports and documents filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
A forward-looking statement may include a statement of the assumptions or bases underlying the forward-looking statement.
The Company believes it has chosen these assumptions or bases in good faith and that they are reasonable. However, the Company
cautions you that assumptions or bases almost always vary from actual results, and the differences between assumptions or bases and
actual results can be material.
20
The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or otherwise revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a
result of new information, future events or otherwise, unless the securities laws require the Company to do so.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations analyzes the major elements of the
Company's balance sheets and statements of income. This section should be read in conjunction with the Company's consolidated
financial statements and accompanying notes and other detailed information appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-
K. The Commercial merger was accounted for as a pooling of interests and therefore the historical financial data of the Company has
been restated to include the accounts and operations of Commercial for all periods prior to February 23, 2001.
Overview
For the Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
The Company generates the majority of its revenues from interest income on loans, service charges on customer accounts and
income from investment in securities. The revenues are offset by interest expense paid on deposits and other borrowings and non-
interest expenses such as administrative and occupancy expenses. Net interest income is the difference between interest income on
earning assets such as loans and securities and interest expense on liabilities such as deposits and borrowings which are used to fund
those assets. Interest income is the Company’s largest source of revenue, representing 60.8% of total revenue during 2004. The level
of interest rates and the volume and mix of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities impact net interest income and margin. The
Company has recognized increased net interest income due primarily to an increase in the volume of interest-earning assets.
Three principal components of the Company’s growth strategy are internal growth, stringent cost control practices and
strategic merger transactions. The Company focuses on continual internal growth. Each Banking Center is operated as a separate
profit center, maintaining separate data with respect to its net interest income, efficiency ratio, deposit growth, loan growth and overall
profitability. Banking Center Presidents and Managers are accountable for performance in these areas and compensated accordingly.
The Company also focuses on maintaining stringent cost control practices and policies. The Company has invested significantly in the
infrastructure required to centralize many of its critical operations, such as data processing and loan application processing.
Management believes that this centralized infrastructure can accommodate substantial additional growth while enabling the Company
to minimize operational costs through certain economies of scale. The Company also intends to continue to seek expansion
opportunities. During 2003, eleven banking centers were acquired in the Dallas/Fort Worth area. The acquisitions of Abrams and
Dallas Bancshares were completed in May and June 2003, respectively, adding three banking centers in Dallas. The mergers with
MainBancorp and FSBNT were completed in November and December 2003, respectively, adding an additional eight banking centers
in Dallas. As a part of these acquisitions, two of the acquired banking centers were combined into existing banking centers nearby
bringing the total to nine banking centers added in 2003. During 2004, seven banking centers were acquired in the Austin, Texas
area. The acquisitions of both Liberty Bancshares, Inc. and Village Bank and Trust s.s.b. were completed on August 1, 2004.
Net income was $34.7 million, $26.6 million and $21.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002,
respectively, and diluted earnings per share were $1.59, $1.36 and $1.22, respectively, for these same periods. Earnings growth during
both 2004 and 2003 resulted principally from an increase in loan volume and acquisitions, including the Abrams, Dallas Bancshares,
MainBancorp, FSBNT, Liberty and Village acquisitions. Earnings growth during both 2003 and 2002 also resulted principally from an
increase in loan volume and acquisitions, including the Abrams, Dallas Bancshares, MainBancorp, FBNT, Texas Guaranty, First
State, Paradigm, FNB and Southwest acquisitions. The Company posted returns on average assets of 1.36%, 1.32% and 1.45% and
returns on average equity of 14.27%, 15.60% and 18.66% for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The
Company's efficiency ratio was 49.23% in 2004, 51.58% in 2003 and 50.36% in 2002.
Total assets at December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 were $2.697 billion, $2.400 billion and $1.823 billion, respectively. Total
deposits at December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 were $2.317 billion, $2.084 billion, and $1.587 billion, respectively, with deposit
growth in each period resulting from acquisitions and internal growth. Total loans were $1.036 billion at December 31, 2004, an
increase of $265.5 million or 34.5% from $770.1 million at the end of 2003. Total loans were $679.6 million at year-end 2002. At
December 31, 2004, the Company had $1.4 million in nonperforming loans and its allowance for credit losses was $13.1 million.
Shareholders' equity was $275.6 million, $219.6 million and $154.7 million at December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
On May 31, 2002, the Company effected a two-for-one stock split in the form of a 100 percent stock dividend to shareholders
of record on May 20, 2002. The Company issued approximately 8.1 million shares in connection with the split. All per share and
share information for 2002 and prior periods has been restated to reflect this split.
Critical Accounting Policies
The Company’s accounting policies are integral to understanding the results reported. The Company’s accounting policies
are described in detail in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements. The Company believes that of its significant accounting
policies, the allowance for credit losses may involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity:
21
Allowance for Credit Losses - The allowance for credit losses is a reserve established through charges to earnings in the form
of a provision for credit losses. Management has established an allowance for credit losses which it believes is adequate for estimated
losses in the Company's loan portfolio. Based on an evaluation of the loan portfolio, management presents a monthly review of the
allowance for credit losses to the Bank's Board of Directors, indicating any change in the allowance since the last review and any
recommendations as to adjustments in the allowance. In making its evaluation, management considers factors such as historical loan
loss experience, industry diversification of the Company's commercial loan portfolio, the amount of nonperforming assets and related
collateral, the volume, growth and composition of the Company’s loan portfolio, current economic changes that may affect the
borrower’s ability to pay and the value of collateral, the evaluation of the Company’s loan portfolio through its internal loan review
process and other relevant factors. Portions of the allowance may be allocated for specific credits; however, the entire allowance is
available for any credit that, in management’s judgment, should be charged off. Charge-offs occur when loans are deemed to be
uncollectible. The allowance for credit losses includes allowance allocations calculated in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 114, “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan,” as amended by SFAS 118, and
allowance allocations determined in accordance with SFAS No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies.”
Results of Operations
Net Interest Income
The Company’s operating results depend primarily on its net interest income, which is the difference between interest income
on interest-earning assets, including securities and loans, and interest expense incurred on interest-bearing liabilities, including
deposits and other borrowed funds. Interest rate fluctuations, as well as changes in the amount and type of earning assets and
liabilities, combine to affect net interest income. The Company’s net interest income is affected by changes in the amount and mix of
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, referred to as a “volume change.” It is also affected by changes in yields earned
on interest-earning assets and rates paid on interest-bearing deposits and other borrowed funds, referred to as a “rate change.”
The Company adopted FIN 46R, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” on January 1, 2004. FIN 46R requires that
Prosperity Capital Trust I, Prosperity Statutory Trust II, Prosperity Statutory Trust III, Prosperity Statutory Trust IV and Paradigm
Capital Trust II be deconsolidated from the consolidated financial statements. After adoption, the trust preferred securities issued by
each of the foregoing trusts are no longer shown in the consolidated financial statements. Instead, the junior subordinated debentures
issued by the Company to each of these trusts are shown as liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets and interest expense
associated with such junior subordinated debentures is shown as interest expense in the consolidated statements of income. The
dividend expense associated with the trust preferred securities for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003 was previously
shown as noninterest expense. Prior period data has been restated to reflect the adoption of FIN 46R.
2004 versus 2003. Net interest income before the provision for credit losses for the year ended December 31, 2004 was $82.0
million compared with $64.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, an increase of $17.5 million or 27.1%. The improvement
in net interest income for 2004 was principally due to an increase in average interest-earning assets to $2.302 billion at December 31,
2004 from $1.830 billion at December 31 2003, an increase of $471.3 million or 25.8%. The improvement in net interest income for
2004 was also partially due to a decrease in the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities that was greater than the decrease in the yield
on earning-assets. Total cost of interest-bearing liabilities decreased 15 basis points from 1.79% for the year ended December 31,
2003 to 1.64% for the year ended December 31, 2004 while total yield on interest-earning assets decreased only 10 basis points from
4.96% at December 31, 2003 to 4.86% at December 31, 2004. At December 31, 2004, period end demand deposits represent an
important component of funding sources and averaged 22.4% of total period end deposits in 2004 compared with 22.4% in 2003.
Net interest margin (not on a tax equivalent basis), defined as net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets,
for 2004 was 3.56% up four basis points from 3.52% in 2003. The increase in the net interest margin is attributable to an increase in
interest earning assets.
2003 versus 2002. Net interest income before provision for credit losses for the year ended December 31, 2003 was $64.5
million compared with $52.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, an increase of $11.9 million or 22.5%. The improvement
in net interest income for 2003 was principally due to an increase in average interest-earning assets. Average interest-earning assets
increased $466.2 million from $1.364 billion for the year ended December 31, 2002 to $1.830 billion for the year ended December 31,
2003. Total cost of interest-bearing liabilities decreased 73 basis points from 2.52% for the year ended December 31, 2002 to 1.79%
for the year ended December 31, 2003. Total yield on interest-earning assets decreased 96 basis points from 5.92% for the year ended
December 31, 2002 to 4.96% for the year ended December 31, 2003. The net interest margin (not on a tax equivalent basis) decreased
34 basis points to 3.52% for the year ended December 31, 2003 from 3.86% for the year ended December 31, 2002 due to the yield on
earning assets decreasing at a greater rate than the decrease in the cost of interest bearing liabilities.
22
The following table presents for the periods indicated the total dollar amount of average balances, interest income from
average interest-earning assets and the resultant yields, as well as the interest expense on average interest-bearing liabilities, expressed
both in dollars and rates. Except as indicated in the footnotes, no tax-equivalent adjustments were made and all average balances are
daily average balances. Any nonaccruing loans have been included in the table as loans carrying a zero yield.
Outstanding Earned/
Balance
Paid
Assets
Interest-earning assets:
Loans................................................................ $ 871,736 $ 55,779
Securities (1)......................................................
55,241
Federal funds sold and other temporary
1,383,790
2004
Average
Interest Average Average
Years Ended December 31,
2003
Interest
Earned/
Paid
Average
Yield/
Rate
Average
Interest Average
2002
Outstanding Earned/ Yield/
Rate
Balance
Paid
Yield/ Outstanding
Rate
Balance
(Dollars in thousands)
6.40%
3.99
$ 697,235
1,108,153
$ 46,686
43,911
6.70%
3.96
$ 524,885
818,362
$ 38,330
42,104
7.30%
5.14
investments ....................................................
46,121
736
1.60
24,976
248
0.99
20,956
308
1.47
Total interest-earning assets. .......................
2,301,647
111,756 4.86%
1,830,364
90,845
4.96%
1,364,203
80,742
5.92%
Less allowance for credit losses ......................
(11,454 )
(9,525 )
(7,350)
Total interest-earning assets, net
of allowance............................................... 2,290,193
Noninterest-earning assets ..............................
252,895
Total assets................................................... $2,543,088
Liabilities and shareholders' equity
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing demand deposits.................... $ 485,557 $
Savings and money market accounts. .............
Certificates of deposit......................................
Junior subordinated debentures.......................
Federal funds purchased and other
495,330
735,095
59,288
1,820,839
186,030
$2,006,869
1,356,853
113,905
$1,470,758
5,027
4,002
15,557
4,046
1.04% $
0.81
2.12
6.82
371,801
406,333
616,353
39,400
$ 4,187
3,502
14,944
2,630
1.13% $
0.86
2.42
6.68
249,045 $
315,717
505,796
29,648
3,162 1.27%
1.65
3.28
7.32
5,219
16,595
2,170
borrowings. ....................................................
40,119
1,157
2.88
38,824
1,083
2.79
16,435
955
5.81
Total interest-bearing
liabilities.....................................................
1,815,389
29,789
1.64%
1,472,711
26,346 1.79%
1,116,641
28,101
2.52%
Noninterest-bearing liabilities:
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits... ..........
Other liabilities.......................................... .....
473,713
10,712
Total liabilities. ............................................
2,299,814
Shareholders' equity ............................................
243,274
Total liabilities and shareholders'
equity. ........................................................ $2,543,088
354,558
9,433
1,836,702
170,167
230,326
9,557
1, 356,524
114,234
$2,006,869
$ 1,470,758
Net interest rate spread ........................................
3.21 %
3.17%
3.40%
Net interest income and margin (2) ......................
Net interest income and margin ..........................
(tax-equivalent basis) (3).....................................
__________________________________________
$
81,967
3.56%
$ 64,499 3.52%
$ 52,641 3.86%
$
83,631
3.63%
$ 66,612 3.64%
$ 54,564 4.00%
(1)
Yield is based on amortized cost and does not include any component of unrealized gains or losses.
(2)
The net interest margin is equal to net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets.
(3)
In order to make pretax income and resultant yields on tax-exempt investments and loans comparable to those on taxable investments and loans, a tax-
equivalent adjustment has been computed using a federal income tax rate of 35% for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 and other applicable
effective tax rates.
23
The following table presents information regarding the dollar amount of changes in interest income and interest expense for
the major components of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and distinguishes between the increase (decrease)
related to higher outstanding balances and the changes in interest rates. For purposes of this table, changes attributable to both rate and
volume which cannot be segregated have been allocated to rate.
Years Ended December 31,
2004 vs. 2003
2003 vs. 2002
Increase
(Decrease)
Due to Change in
Volume
Rate
Increase
(Decrease)
Due to Change in
Volume
Rate
Total
(Dollars in thousands)
Total
Interest-earning assets:
Loans............................................................................ $ 11,684
10,922
Securities......................................................................
Federal funds sold and other temporary
$
(2,591 ) $
408
9,093
11,330
$ 12,586
14,909
$
(4,230 )
(13,102 )
$ 8,356
1,807
investments............................................................
Total increase (decrease) in interest income ..........
210
22,816
278
(1,905 )
488
20,911
59
27,554
(119) (60)
10,103
(17,451 )
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing demand deposits.................................
Savings and money market accounts............................
Certificates of deposit. .................................................
Junior subordinated debentures ....................................
Federal funds purchased and other borrowings. ...........
Total increase (decrease) in interest expense ........
1,281
767
2,879
1,328
36
6,291
Increase (decrease) in net interest income ........................ $ 16,525
$
Provision for Credit Losses
840
500
(441 )
(267 )
(2,266 )
88
38
(2,848 )
613
1,416
74
3,443
943 $ 17,468
1,559
1,498
3,627
714
(534 )
(3,215 )
(5,278 )
(254 )
1,301 (1,173)
(10,454 )
(6,997 )
8,699
$ 18,855
$
1,025
(1,717 )
(1,651 )
460
128
(1,755 )
$ 11,858
The Company’s provision for credit losses is established through charges to income in the form of the provision in order to
bring the Company’s allowance for credit losses to a level deemed appropriate by management based on the factors discussed under
“Financial Condition - Allowance for Credit Losses”. The allowance for credit losses at December 31, 2004 was $13.1 million,
representing 1.27% of outstanding loans. The provision for credit losses for the year ended December 31, 2004 was $880,000
compared with $483,000 for the year ended December 31, 2003. In 2004, an additional $400,000 provision for credit losses was made
in anticipation of increased charge-offs related to loans acquired in merger transactions that year. Total net charge-offs for the year
ended December 31, 2004 were $485,000 compared with $1.6 million in net charge-offs for the year ended December 31, 2003. The
provision for credit losses for the year ended December 31, 2003 was $483,000 compared with $1.0 million for the year ended
December 31, 2002. In 2002, an additional $500,000 provision for credit loss was made in anticipation of increased charge-offs
related to loans acquired through acquisitions that year. The increased charge-offs were made in 2003, with net charge-offs of $1.6
million compared with $396,000 in net charge-offs for the year ended December 31, 2002.
Noninterest Income
The Company’s primary sources of recurring noninterest income are service charges on deposit accounts and other banking
service related fees. Non-interest income does not include loan origination fees which are recognized over the life of the related loan
as an adjustment to yield using the interest method. Banking related service fees include check cashing fees, official check fees, safe
deposit box rent and currency handling fees. For the year ended December 31, 2004, noninterest income totaled $23.1 million, an
increase of $6.1 million or 36.0% compared with $17.0 million in 2003. The increase was primarily due to an increase in insufficient
funds charges and customer service charges which resulted from an increase in the number of accounts due to the MainBancorp and
FSBNT acquisitions in the fourth quarter of 2003 and the Liberty and Village acquisitions completed in August 2004. The two
acquisitions in late 2003 and the two acquisitions in 2004 added approximately 33,500 deposit accounts and over 5,000 debit cards.
Noninterest income for 2003 was $17.0 million, an increase of $5.4 million or 46.3% from $11.6 million in 2002, resulting largely
from an increase in service charges due to the additional deposit accounts from the Abrams and Dallas Bancshares in 2003 and the
Paradigm, FNB and Southwest acquisitions in the third and fourth quarters of 2002.
24
The following table presents, for the periods indicated, the major categories of noninterest income:
2004
Years Ended December 31,
2003
(Dollars in thousands)
2002
Service charges on deposit accounts...................................
Banking related service fees ...............................................
Trust and investment income ..............................................
Gains on sales of assets (net) ..............................................
Gain on sale of securities ....................................................
Other noninterest income....................................................
Total noninterest income. ..............................................
$20,215
1,002
214
389(1)
78
1,173
$23,071
$14,236
780
502
379
--
1,069
$16,966
$ 9,764
527
444
39
--
820
$ 11,594
__________________________________
(1) Includes gains on the sale of TIB-The Independent BankersBank stock acquired in various acquisitions and a gain on the sale of
real property acquired in the Paradigm acquisition.
Noninterest Expense
For the year ended December 31, 2004, noninterest expense totaled $51.7 million, an increase of $9.7 million or 23.1%
compared with $42.0 million for the same period in 2003. This increase is principally due to increases in salaries and employee
benefits, net occupancy and depreciation costs, core deposit intangibles amortization and other expenses which includes advertising
expense. For the year ended December 31, 2003, noninterest expense totaled $42.0 million, an increase of $9.7 million or 29.9% over
$32.3 million for the same period in 2002. The increase is primarily attributable to the additional general operating costs associated
wit the acquisitions made in 2002. These items and other changes in the various components of noninterest expense are discussed in
more detail below.
The following table presents, for the periods indicated, the major categories of noninterest expense:
Salaries and employee benefits (1) ..............................................
Non-staff expenses:
2004
Years Ended December 31,
2003
(Dollars in thousands)
2002
$27,860
$22,422
$ 16,379
Net occupancy expense .................................................
Depreciation expense ....................................................
Data processing .............................................................
Regulatory assessments and FDIC insurance ................
Ad valorem and franchise taxes.....................................
Core deposit intangibles amortization ...........................
Communications expense (2)..........................................
Other..............................................................................
Total noninterest expense. ................................
4,814
2,843
2,036
524
1,154
1,781
2,929
7,766
$51,707
4,492
2,535
2,128
427
851
818
2,528
5,820
$42,021
3,439
1,830
2,131
367
676
192
1,926
5,409
$32,349
______________________
(1) Salaries and employee benefits expense includes $141,000 and $26,000 in 2004 and 2003 respectively, in compensation related
to the granting of stock options.
(2) Communications expense includes telephone, data circuits, postage and courier expenses.
Salaries and Employee Benefits. Salaries and employee benefits increased $5.4 million from $22.4 million at December 31,
2003 to $27.9 million at December 31, 2004 primarily due to increased staff associated with the MainBancorp and FSBNT
acquisitions in fourth quarter 2003 and the Village and Liberty acquisitions in 2004. The increase is also partially attributable to
annual merit increases. The number of associates employed by the Company increased from 629 at December 31, 2003 to 653 at
December 31, 2004. In accordance with the Company’s adoption of SFAS 123, salaries and employee benefits expense for the year
ended December 31, 2004 includes $141,000 in compensation expense related to the granting of stock options compared with $26,000
for the year ended December 31, 2003. Salaries and employee benefits increased $6.0 million from $16.4 million at December 31,
2002 to $22.4 million at December 31, 2003 primarily due to increased staff associated with the Abrams and Dallas Bancshares
acquisitions in 2003 and the Texas Guaranty, Paradigm, First State, FNB and Southwest acquisitions in 2002.
25
Net Occupancy and Depreciation Expenses. Net occupancy expense increased $322,000 or 7.2% to $4.8 million for the year
ended December 31, 2004 compared with $4.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. Depreciation expense increased
$308,000 from $2.5 million to $2.8 million for the same periods. Both increases are attributable to the addition of seven banking
centers associated with the acquisitions made in 2004 and an additional 6 banking centers associated with the FSBNT and
MainBancorp acquisitions in fourth quarter 2003. Net occupancy expense increased $1.1 million or 30.6% to $4.5 million for the
year ended December 31, 2003 compared with $3.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. Depreciation expense increased
$705,000 from $1.8 million to $2.5 million for the same periods. Both increases are attributable to the addition of nine banking centers
acquired in 2003.
Communications Expense. Communications expense includes telephone, data circuits, postage and courier expenses.
Communications expense was $2.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 compared with $2.5 million for the same period in
2003, an increase of $401,000 or 15.9%. The increase is attributable to the addition of seven banking centers in Austin, Texas in 2004
and an additional 6 banking centers associated with the FSBNT and MainBancorp acquisitions in fourth quarter 2003.
Communications expense increased $602,000 or 31.3% from $1.9 million for the year December 31, 2002 to $2.5 million for the same
period in 2003. The increase is associated with the addition of nine banking centers acquired in 2003.
Core Deposit Intangibles Amortization. Core deposit intangibles amortization was $1.8 million for the year ended December
31, 2004 compared with $818,000 for the same period in 2003, an increase of $963,000 or 117.7%. The increase is attributable to the
addition of $4.7 million in core deposit intangible assets related to the MainBancorp and FSBNT acquisitions in the fourth quarter of
2003 and the Liberty and Village acquisitions completed in August 2004. Core deposit intangibles are being amortized on an
accelerated basis over an eight year life. Core deposit intangibles amortization increased $626,000 or 326.0% from $192,000 for the
year December 31, 2002 to $818,000 for the same period in 2003. The increase is associated with the addition of $2.6 million in core
deposit intangible assets related to the acquisitions made in 2003.
Other Noninterest Expense. Other operating expenses of $7.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 represented an
increase of $1.9 million or 33.4% compared with $5.8 million in 2003. The increase is primarily attributable to increased advertising
costs and the additional general operating costs associated with the acquisition of seven banking centers in 2004 and the MainBancorp
and FSBNT acquisitions in the fourth quarter 2003. Other operating expenses increased $411,000 or 7.6% from $5.4 million at
December 31, 2002 to $5.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. The increase is attributable to additional operating
expenses related to the acquisitions made in 2003.
Efficiency Ratio. The efficiency ratio is a supplemental financial measure utilized in management’s internal evaluation of the
Company and is not defined under generally accepted accounting principles. The efficiency ratio is calculated by dividing total
noninterest expense, excluding securities losses and credit loss provisions, by net interest income plus noninterest income, excluding
securities gains. Taxes are not part of this calculation. An increase in the efficiency ratio indicates that more resources are being
utilized to generate the same volume of income, while a decrease would indicate a more efficient allocation of resources. The
Company's efficiency ratio was 49.23% at December 31, 2004, a decrease from 51.58% at December 31, 2003. The decrease reflects
the Company’s continued success in controlling operating expenses and the cost savings achieved with the acquisitions made in
2004. The Company’s efficiency ratio was 50.36% at December 31, 2002.
Income Taxes
The amount of federal income tax expense is influenced by the amount of taxable income, the amount of tax-exempt income,
the amount of nondeductible interest expense and the amount of other nondeductible expenses. For the year ended December 31,
2004, income tax expense was $17.7 million compared with $12.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 and $9.6 million for
the year ended December 31, 2002. The increases were primarily attributable to higher pretax net earnings which resulted from an
increase in net interest income for the year ended December 31, 2004 when compared to the same period in 2003 and 2002. The
effective tax rate in the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 was 33.8%, 31.9% and 30.9%, respectively. The effective
income tax rates differed from the U.S. statutory rate of 35% during the comparable periods primarily due to the effect of tax-exempt
income from loans and securities.
Impact of Inflation
The Company's consolidated financial statements and related notes included in this annual report on Form 10-K have been
prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. These require the measurement of financial position and
operating results in terms of historical dollars, without considering changes in the relative purchasing power of money over time due
to inflation.
26
Unlike many industrial companies, substantially all of the Company's assets and liabilities are monetary in nature. As a
result, interest rates have a more significant impact on the Company's performance than the effects of general levels of inflation.
Interest rates may not necessarily move in the same direction or in the same magnitude as the prices of goods and services. However,
other expenses do reflect general levels of inflation.
Financial Condition
Loan Portfolio
At December 31, 2004, total loans were $1.036 billion, an increase of $265.5 million or 34.5% from $770.1 million at
December 31, 2003. The growth in loans is primarily attributable to the combined effect of internal growth and the Liberty and
Village acquisitions. At December 31, 2004, total loans at the banking centers acquired in 2004 totaled $189.0 million. At December
31, 2004, total loans were 44.7% of deposits and 38.4% of total assets. At December 31, 2003, total loans were 37.0% of deposits and
32.1% of total assets. Loans increased 13.3% during 2003 from $679.6 million at December 31, 2002 to $770.1 million at December
31, 2003. The growth in loans is primarily attributable to internal growth and the 2003 acquisitions.
The following table summarizes the Company’s loan portfolio by type of loan as of the dates indicated:
2004
2003
December 31,
2002
2001
2000
Amount
Percent
Amount Percent Amount
Percent Amount Percent
Amount
Percent
(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial and industrial ............................ $ 144,432
Real estate:
Construction and land
13.9%
$ 93,989
12.2%
$ 93,797
13.8% $ 46,986 11.1% $ 46,529 11.3%
development. ............................................
1-4 family residential....................................
Home equity .................................................
Commercial mortgages.................................
Farmland.......................................................
Multifamily residential .................................
Agriculture......................................................
Other ...............................................................
Consumer (net of unearned discount). ..........
109,591
260,453
34,453
369,151
22,240
18,187
21,906
2,246
52,854
10.6
25.2
3.3
35.6
2.1
1.9
2.1
0.2
5.1
Total loans......................................... $1,035,513 100.0%
36,470
237,055
27,943
260,882
15,247
20,679
20,693
2,274
54,821
$770,053
4.7
30.8
3.6
33.9
2.0
2.7
2.7
0.3
7.1
52,377
206,586
23,249
183,970
11,887
15,502
24,683
3,020
64,488
100.0% $679,559
7.7
30.4
3.4
27.1
1.7
2.3
3.6
0.4
9.6
20,963
4.9
175,253 41.3
4.8
20,541
18.5
78,446
2.5
10,686
2.3
9,694
3.7
15,757
0.2
953
10.7
20,128
175,525
16,762
75,896
12,218
2,961
13,251
2,563
4.9
42.7
4.1
18.5
3.0
0.7
3.2
0.6
11.0
45,121
100.0% $ 424,400 100.0%
45,370
$411,203 100.0%
The Company is focused on growing its commercial mortgage and commercial loan portfolios. The Company’s commercial
mortgages grew from $260.9 million at December 31, 2003 to $369.1 million at December 31, 2004, an increase of $108.3 million or
41.5%. The Company’s commercial and industrial loans grew from $94.0 million at December 31, 2003 to $144.4 million at
December 31, 2004, an increase of $50.4 million or 53.7%.The Company offers a variety of commercial lending products including
term loans and lines of credit. The Company also offers a broad range of short to medium-term commercial loans, primarily
collateralized, to businesses for working capital (including inventory and receivables), business expansion (including acquisitions of
real estate and improvements) and the purchase of equipment and machinery. Historically, the Company has originated loans for its
own account and has not securitized its loans. The purpose of a particular loan generally determines its structure. All loans in the 1-4
family residential category were originated by the Company.
All loans above $1.5 million are evaluated and acted upon by an officers' loan committee, which meets weekly. In addition
to an officers’ loan committee evaluation, loans from $5.0 million to $10.0 million are evaluated and acted upon by the Directors Loan
Committee, which consists of three directors and meets as necessary and loans over $10.0 million must be evaluated and acted upon
by the full board of directors which meets monthly.
Commercial Loans. In nearly all cases, the Company's commercial loans are made in the Company's market areas and are
underwritten on the basis of the borrower's ability to service the debt from income. As a general practice, the Company takes as
collateral a lien on any available real estate, equipment or other assets owned by the borrower and obtains a personal guaranty of the
borrower or principal. Working capital loans are primarily collateralized by short-term assets whereas term loans are primarily
collateralized by long-term assets. In general, commercial loans involve more credit risk than residential mortgage loans and
commercial mortgage loans and, therefore, usually yield a higher return. The increased risk in commercial loans is due to the type of
collateral securing these loans. The increased risk also derives from the expectation that commercial loans generally will be serviced
principally from the operations of the business, and those operations may not be successful. Historical trends have shown these types
of loans to have higher delinquencies than mortgage loans. As a result of these additional complexities, variables and risks,
commercial loans require more thorough underwriting and servicing than other types of loans.
27
Commercial Mortgages. The Company makes commercial mortgage loans collateralized by real estate to finance the
purchase of real estate. The Company's commercial mortgage loans are collateralized by first liens on real estate, typically have
variable interest rates and amortize over a ten to 15 year period. Payments on loans secured by such properties are often dependent on
the successful operation or management of the properties. Accordingly, repayment of these loans may be subject to adverse conditions
in the real estate market or the economy to a greater extent than other types of loans. The Company seeks to minimize these risks in a
variety of ways, including giving careful consideration to the property's operating history, future operating projections, current and
projected occupancy, location and physical condition in connection with underwriting these loans. The underwriting analysis also
includes credit verification, appraisals and a review of the financial condition of the borrower.
1-4 Family Residential Loans. A significant portion of the Company's lending activity has consisted of the origination of 1-4
family residential mortgage loans collateralized by owner-occupied properties located in the Company's market areas. The Company
offers a variety of mortgage loan products which generally are amortized over five to 25 years. Loans collateralized by 1-4 family
residential real estate generally have been originated in amounts of no more than 90% of appraised value or have mortgage insurance.
The Company requires mortgage title insurance and hazard insurance. The Company has elected to keep all 1-4 family residential
loans for its own account rather than selling such loans into the secondary market. By doing so, the Company is able to realize a
higher yield on these loans; however, the Company also incurs interest rate risk as well as the risks associated with nonpayments on
such loans.
Construction Loans. The Company makes loans to finance the construction of residential and, to a limited extent,
nonresidential properties. Construction loans generally are collateralized by first liens on real estate and have floating interest rates.
The Company conducts periodic inspections, either directly or through an agent, prior to approval of periodic draws on these loans.
Underwriting guidelines similar to those described above are also used in the Company's construction lending activities. Construction
loans involve additional risks attributable to the fact that loan funds are advanced upon the security of a project under construction,
and the project is of uncertain value prior to its completion. Because of uncertainties inherent in estimating construction costs, the
market value of the completed project and the effects of governmental regulation on real property, it can be difficult to accurately
evaluate the total funds required to complete a project and the related loan to value ratio. As a result of these uncertainties,
construction lending often involves the disbursement of substantial funds with repayment dependent, in part, on the success of the
ultimate project rather than the ability of a borrower or guarantor to repay the loan. If the Company is forced to foreclose on a project
prior to completion, there is no assurance that the Company will be able to recover all of the unpaid portion of the loan. In addition,
the Company may be required to fund additional amounts to complete a project and may have to hold the property for an
indeterminate period of time. While the Company has underwriting procedures designed to identify what it believes to be acceptable
levels of risks in construction lending, no assurance can be given that these procedures will prevent losses from the risks described
above.
Agriculture Loans. The Company provides agricultural loans for short-term crop production, including rice, cotton, milo and
corn, farm equipment financing and agricultural real estate financing. The Company evaluates agricultural borrowers primarily based
on their historical profitability, level of experience in their particular agricultural industry, overall financial capacity and the
availability of secondary collateral to withstand economic and natural variations common to the industry. Because agricultural loans
present a higher level of risk associated with events caused by nature, the Company routinely makes on-site visits and inspections in
order to monitor and identify such risks.
Consumer Loans. Consumer loans made by the Company include direct “A”-credit automobile loans, recreational vehicle
loans, boat loans, home improvement loans, home equity loans, personal loans (collateralized and uncollateralized) and deposit
account collateralized loans. The terms of these loans typically range from 12 to 120 months and vary based upon the nature of
collateral and size of loan. Consumer loans entail greater risk than do residential mortgage loans, particularly in the case of consumer
loans that are unsecured or collateralized by rapidly depreciating assets such as automobiles. In such cases, any repossessed collateral
for a defaulted consumer loan may not provide an adequate source of repayment for the outstanding loan balance. The remaining
deficiency often does not warrant further substantial collection efforts against the borrower beyond obtaining a deficiency judgment.
In addition, consumer loan collections are dependent on the borrower's continuing financial stability, and thus are more likely to be
adversely affected by job loss, divorce, illness or personal bankruptcy. Furthermore, the application of various federal and state laws
may limit the amount which can be recovered on such loans.
28
The contractual maturity ranges of the commercial and industrial and construction and land development portfolios and the
amount of such loans with predetermined interest rates and floating rates in each maturity range as of December 31, 2004 are
summarized in the following table:
One Year
or Less
$72,934
84,235
$157,169
$ 39,873
117,296
$157,169
December 31, 2004
After One
Through
Five Years
After Five
Years
(Dollars in thousands)
$55,947
19,766
$75,713
$ 23,736
51,977
$75,713
$ 15,551
5,590
$21,141
$ 4,351
16,790
$21,141
Total
$ 144,432
109,591
$ 254,023
$ 67,960
186,063
$ 254,023
Commercial and industrial..............................................
Construction and land development ...............................
Total................................................................
Loans with a predetermined interest rate. .......................
Loans with a floating interest rate...................................
Total................................................................
Nonperforming Assets
The Company has several procedures in place to assist it in maintaining the overall quality of its loan portfolio. The
Company has established underwriting guidelines to be followed by its officers and the Company also monitors its delinquency levels
for any negative or adverse trends. There can be no assurance, however, that the Company's loan portfolio will not become subject to
increasing pressures from deteriorating borrower credit due to general economic conditions.
The Company requires appraisals on loans collateralized by real estate. With respect to potential problem loans, an evaluation
of the borrower's overall financial condition is made to determine the need, if any, for possible write-downs or appropriate additions to
the allowance for credit losses.
The Company generally places a loan on nonaccrual status and ceases accruing interest when the payment of principal or
interest is delinquent for 90 days, or earlier in some cases, unless the loan is in the process of collection and the underlying collateral
fully supports the carrying value of the loan. The Company generally charges off such loans before attaining nonaccrual status.
The Company's conservative lending approach has resulted in strong asset quality. The Company had $1.7 million in
nonperforming assets at December 31, 2004 compared with $927,000 at December 31, 2003 and $2.6 million at December 31, 2002.
Interest foregone on nonaccrual loans for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 was $54,000 and $38,000, respectively.
The following table presents information regarding past due loans and nonperforming assets at the dates indicated:
Nonaccrual loans. ..........................................................
Restructured loans. .........................................................
Other nonperforming loans.............................................
Accruing loans 90 or more days past due .......................
Total nonperforming loans..................................
Other real estate.............................................................
Total nonperforming assets................................
Nonperforming assets to total loans
2004
$
$
297
--
--
1,083
1,380
341
1,721
$
$
December 31,
2003
2002
(Dollars in thousands)
2001
2000
2
--
--
679
681
246
927
$ 1,125
--
1,100
120
2,345
219
$ 2,564
$
$
1
--
--
--
1
--
1
$
10
--
--
778
788
545
$ 1,333
and other real estate ..................................................
0.17%
0.13%
0.38%
0.00%
0.32%
29
Allowance for Credit Losses
The following table presents, for the periods indicated, an analysis of the allowance for credit losses and other related data:
Years Ended December 31,
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
(Dollars in thousands)
Average loans outstanding...........................................
$ 871,736
$ 697,235
$ 524,885
$419,553
$383,054
Gross loans outstanding at end of period. ....................
$1,035,513
$ 770,053
$ 679,559
$424,400
$411,203
Allowance for credit losses at
beginning of period .................................................
Balance acquired with the Liberty and Village
acquisitions in 2004, Abrams, Dallas Bancshares,
MainBancorp and FSBNT acquisitions in 2003,
Texas Guaranty, First State, Paradigm, FNB and
Southwest acquisitions in 2002 and the Compass
acquis ition in 2000,
respectively..............................
Provision for credit losses............................................
Charge-offs:
Commercial and industrial ......................................
Real estate and agriculture ......................................
Consumer................................................................
Recoveries:
Commercial and industrial ......................................
Real estate and agriculture ......................................
Consumer................................................................
Net (charge-offs) recoveries. .......................................
Allowance for credit losses at end of period................
Ratio of allowance to end of period
loans........................................................................
Ratio of net charge-offs (recoveries) to
average loans ..........................................................
Ratio of allowance to end of period
nonperforming loans ...............................................
___________________________
$
10,345
$
9,580
$
5,985
$
5,523
$ 5,031
2,365
880
(139 )
(613 )
(198 )
1,900
483
(810 )
(960 )
(471 )
239
65
161
(485 )
$ 13,105
159
198
266
(1,618 )
$ 10,345
2,981
1,010
(356 )
(231 )
(180 )
111
175
85
(396 )
$ 9580
--
700
(180 )
(175 )
(74 )
15
121
55
(238 )
5,985
46
275
(116 )
(38 )
(63 )
43
263
82
171
5,523
$
$
1.27%
0.06
1.34%
0.23
1.41 %
1.41 %
1.34 %
0.08
0.06
(0.04)
949.6
1,519.1
408.5
n/m(1)
700.89
(1) Amount not meaningful. Nonperforming loans totaled $1,000 at December 31, 2001.
The allowance for credit losses is a reserve established through charges to earnings in the form of a provision for credit
losses. Management has established an allowance for credit losses which it believes is adequate for estimated losses in the Company's
loan portfolio. Based on an evaluation of the loan portfolio, management presents a monthly review of the allowance for credit losses
to the Bank's Board of Directors, indicating any change in the allowance since the last review and any recommendations as to
adjustments in the allowance. In making its evaluation, management considers factors such as historical loan loss experience, industry
diversification of the Company's commercial loan portfolio, the amount of nonperforming assets and related collateral, the volume,
growth and composition of the Company’s loan portfolio, current economic changes that may affect the borrower’s ability to pay and
the value of collateral, the evaluation of the Company’s loan portfolio through its internal loan review process and other relevant
factors. Charge-offs occur when loans are deemed to be uncollectible.
The Company considers risk elements attributable to particular loan types or categories in assessing the quality of individual
loans. Some of the risk elements include:
for 1-4 family residential mortgage loans, the borrower's ability to repay the loan, including a consideration of the debt to
•
income ratio and employment and income stability, the loan to value ratio, and the age, condition and marketability of collateral;
for commercial mortgage loans and multifamily residential loans, the debt service coverage ratio (income from the
•
property in excess of operating expenses compared to loan payment requirements), operating results of the owner in the case of
30
owner-occupied properties, the loan to value ratio, the age and condition of the collateral and the volatility of income, property
value and future operating results typical of properties of that type;
for agricultural real estate loans, the experience and financial capability of the borrower, projected debt service coverage of
•
the operations of the borrower and loan to value ratio;
•
for construction and land development loans, the perceived feasibility of the project including the ability to sell developed
lots or improvements constructed for resale or ability to lease property constructed for lease, the quality and nature of contracts for
presale or preleasing, if any, experience and ability of the developer and loan to value ratio;
•
for commercial and industrial loans, the operating results of the commercial, industrial or professional enterprise, the
borrower's business, professional and financial ability and expertise, the specific risks and volatility of income and operating
results typical for businesses in that category and the value, nature and marketability of collateral; and
for non-real estate agricultural loans, the operating results, experience and financial capability of the borrower, historical
•
and expected market conditions and the value, nature and marketability of collateral.
In addition, for each category, the Company considers secondary sources of income and the financial strength and credit
history of the borrower and any guarantors.
The Company follows a loan review program to evaluate the credit risk in the loan portfolio. Through the loan review
process, the Company maintains an internally classified loan list which, along with the delinquency list of loans, helps management
assess the overall quality of the loan portfolio and the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses. Loans classified as “substandard”
are those loans with clear and defined weaknesses such as a highly-leveraged position, unfavorable financial ratios, uncertain
repayment sources or poor financial condition, which may jeopardize recoverability of the debt. Loans classified as “doubtful” are
those loans which have characteristics similar to substandard accounts but with an increased risk that a loss may occur, or at least a
portion of the loan may require a charge-off if liquidated at present. Loans classified as "loss'' are those loans which are in the process
of being charged off. For each classified loan, the Company generally allocates a specific loan loss reserve equal to a predetermined
percentage of the loan amount, depending on the classification.
In addition to the internally classified loan list and delinquency list of loans, the Company maintains a separate “watch list”
which further aids the Company in monitoring loan portfolios. Watch list loans have one or more deficiencies that require attention in
the short term or pertinent ratios of the loan account that have weakened to a point where more frequent monitoring is warranted.
These loans do not have all of the characteristics of a classified loan (substandard or doubtful) but do show weakened elements
compared with those of a satisfactory credit. The Company reviews these loans to assist in assessing the adequacy of the allowance for
credit losses.
In order to determine the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses, management considers the risk classification or
delinquency status of loans and other factors, such as collateral value, portfolio composition, trends in economic conditions and the
financial strength of borrowers. Management actively monitors the Company’s asset quality and establishes specific allowances for
loans which management believes require reserves greater than those allocated according to their classification or delinquent status.
An unallocated allowance is also established based on the Company's historical charge-off experience and existing general economic
and business conditions affecting the key lending areas of the Company, credit quality trends, collateral values, loan volume and
concentrations and seasoning of the loan portfolio. The Company then charges to operations a provision for credit losses to maintain
the allowance for credit losses at an adequate level determined by the foregoing methodology.
Federal and state bank regulators also require that a bank maintain a reserve that is sufficient to absorb an estimated amount
of unidentified potential losses based on management's perception of economic conditions, loan portfolio growth, historical charge-off
experience and exposure concentrations. Management, along with a number of economists, has perceived during the past year an
increasing instability in the national and Southeast Texas economies and a worldwide economic slowdown that could contribute to job
losses and otherwise adversely affect a broad variety of business sectors. In addition, as the Company has grown, its aggregate loan
portfolio has increased and since the Company has made a decision to diversify its loan portfolio into areas other than 1-4 family
residential mortgage loans, the risk profile of the Company's loans has increased. By virtue of its increased capital levels, the
Company is able to make larger loans, thereby increasing the possibility that one uncollectible loan would have a more severe adverse
impact.
At December 31, 2004, the allowance for credit losses totaled $13.1 million, or 1.27% of total loans. At December 31, 2003,
the allowance aggregated $10.4 million or 1.34% of total loans and at December 31, 2002, the allowance was $9.6 million, or 1.41%
of total loans.
31
The following tables describe the allocation of the allowance for credit losses among various categories of loans and certain
other information as of the dates indicated. The allocation is made for analytical purposes and is not necessarily indicative of the
categories in which future losses may occur. The total allowance is available to absorb losses from any segment of loans.
Balance of allowance for credit losses applicable to:
Commercial and industrial ............................................
Real estate .....................................................................
Agriculture ....................................................................
Consumer and other. .....................................................
Unallocated ...................................................................
Total allowance for credit losses......................
2004
2003
December 31,
Percent of
Loans to
Total Loans
Amount
(Dollars in thousands)
Percent of
Loans to
Total Loans
13.9%
78.7
2.1
5.3
--
100.0%
$
253
957
35
34
9,066
$ 10,345
12.2%
77.7
2.7
7.4
--
100.0%
Amount
$
274
503
12
26
12,290
$ 13,105
2002
December 31,
2001
Percent of
Loans to
Total Loans
Amount
Amount
Percent of
Loans to
Total Loans
(Dollars in thousands)
2000
Percent of
Loans to
Amount Total Loans
Balance of allowance for credit losses
applicable to:
Commercial and industrial............................... $ 559
397
42
71
8,781
Real estate.......................................................
Agriculture......................................................
Consumer and other. .......................................
Unallocated .....................................................
Total allowance for credit
13.8%
72.6
3.6
10.0
--
$ 357
553
11
10
5,054
11.1%
74.3
3.7
10.9
--
$ 625
116
17
28
4,737
11.3%
73.9
3.2
11.6
--
losses. .............................................. $ 9,850
100.0%
$ 5,985
100.0%
$ 5,523
100.0%
The Company believes that the allowance for credit losses at December 31, 2004 is adequate to cover losses inherent in the
portfolio as of such date. There can be no assurance, however, that the Company will not sustain losses in future periods, which could
be substantial in relation to the size of the allowance at December 31, 2004.
Securities
The Company uses its securities portfolio as a source of income, as a source of liquidity for cash requirements and to manage
interest rate risk. At December 31, 2004, investment securities totaled $1.30 billion, a decrease of $74.1 million or 5.4% from $1.38
million at December 31, 2003. The decrease in securities is primarily the result of the Company utilizing cash flow from the portfolio
to fund loan growth. Securities increased to $1.38 billion at December 31, 2003 from $950.3 million at December 31, 2002, an
increase of $426.7 million or 44.9%. The Company acquired $102.1 million in securities from the Abrams, Dallas Bancshares,
MainBancorp and FSNBT acquisitions in 2003. At December 31, 2004, securities represented 48.3% of total assets compared with
57.4% of total assets at December 31, 2003.
32
The following table summarizes the amortized cost of securities as of the dates shown (available-for-sale securities are not
adjusted for unrealized gains or losses).
December 31,
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
(Dollars in thousands)
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations
of U.S. government agencies. ...................................
$
30,726 $
48,762 $
70% non-taxable preferred stock .......................................
States and political subdivisions ........................................
Corporate debt securities....................................................
Collateralized mortgage obligations..............................
Mortgage-backed securities ...............................................
Qualified Zone Academy Bond (QZAB)...........................
24,000
37,698
10,787
238,994
957,354
8,000
44,015
45,738
15,902
178,487
1,032,861
8,000
97,098
44,029
50,994
25,338
168,282
552,515
8,000
$
143,397
$
334,562
24,058
43,503
22,712
17,378
492,940
8,000
19,085
38,819
24,906
18,307
142,354
8,000
Total....................................................................................
$ 1,307,559 $ 1,373,765
$ 946,256
$
751,988
$
586,033
The following table summarizes the contractual maturity of securities and their weighted average yields. Available-for-sale
securities are shown at fair value and held-to-maturity securities are shown at amortized cost. Equity securities are included in the
corporate debt securities category.
Within One
Year
After One Year
but
Within Five
Years
Amount
Yield
Amount
Yield
December 31, 2004
After Five Years
but
Within Ten
After Ten
Years
Years
Total
Amount
Yield
(Dollars in thousands)
Amount Yield
Total
Yield
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations
of U.S. government agencies ...........
$ 15,338
4.45%
$ 14,280
4.62%
$ 1,043
4.93 % $
--
--%
$ 30,661
4.55%
70% non-taxable preferred stock .............
--
--
--
--
--
--
States and political subdivisions. ..............
4,693
5.66
14,612
5.41
8,495
6.63
17,850
11,263
3.69
7.81
17,850
39,063
Corporate debt securities...........................
3,667
5.48
Collateralized mortgage obligations. ........
--
--
7,120
1,520
5.77
2.61
--
--
--
--
10,787
26,053
4.18
211,462
4.09
239,035
4.09
3.69
6.40
5.67
Mortgage-backed securities ......................
265
5.12
11,324
5.55
580,567
4.09
365,240
4.31
957,396
4.19
Qualified Zone Academy Bond (QZAB)..
--
--
--
--
8,000
2.00
--
--
8,000
2.00
Total...........................................................
$ 23,963
4.85%
$ 48,856
5.18%
$ 624,158
4.10 % $ 605,815
4.28% $1,302,792
4.24 %
The contractual maturity of mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations is not a reliable indicator of
their expected life because borrowers have the right to prepay their obligations at any time. Mortgage-backed securities monthly pay
downs cause the average lives of the securities to be much different than their stated lives. For purposes of the above table, tax-
exempt states and political subdivisions are calculated on a tax equivalent basis. The QZAB bond is not calculated on a tax equivalent
basis and it generates a tax credit of 7.18%, which is included in gross income. The 70% non-taxable preferred stock includes
investments in Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac)
preferred stock.
The Company does not own securities of any one issuer (other than the U.S. government and its agencies) for which
aggregate adjusted cost exceeds 10% of the consolidated shareholders' equity at December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003.
The average yield of the securities portfolio was 3.99% in 2004 compared with 3.96% in 2003 and 5.14% in 2002. The three
basis point increase was primarily due to the Company reinvesting funds at higher rates in 2004 compared to 2003. The decline in the
average yield from 2002 to 2003 primarily resulted from the investment of new funds received from deposit growth at lower current
yields and the reinvestment of proceeds from the early repayment of mortgage-backed securities in similar investments, also at lower
current yields. The early repayment of mortgage-backed securities primarily resulted from borrower refinancing due to lower market
interest rates. The overall growth in the securities portfolio over the comparable periods was primarily funded by deposit growth.
33
The following table summarizes the carrying value by classification of securities as of the dates shown:
2004
2003
December 31,
2002
(Dollars in thousands)
2001
2000
Available-for-sale......................................................
Held-to-maturity........................................................
Total..................................................................
$ 177,683
1,125,109
$1,302,792
$ 263,648
1,113,232
$1,376,880
$ 309,219
$ 482,233
641,098
270,089
$ 950,317
$ 752,322
$ 334,773
252,179
$ 586,952
The following tables present the amortized cost and fair value of securities classified as available-for-sale at December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002:
Amortized
Cost
December 31, 2004
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
(Dollars in thousands)
Fair
Value
Amortized
Cost
December 31, 2003
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
(Dollars in thousands)
Fair
Value
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations
of U.S. government agencies.......................... $ 10,579
$
70% non-taxable preferred stock ....................... 24,000
2
--
States and political subdivisions. ....................... 14,382
1,366
Collateralized mortgage obligations .................. 13,143
Mortgage-backed securities................................
112,050
Qualified Zone Academy Bond (QZAB)...........
8,000
Other ...................................................................
296
76
545
--
--
$
69
$10,512
$ 15,824
$
247
$
-- $ 16,071
6,150
17,850
--
35
15,748
13,184
44,015
15,141
17,745
502
112,093
159,525
--
--
8,000
296
8,000
283
--
1,798
510
1,179
--
--
327
43,688
--
68
16,939
18,187
224
160,480
--
8,000
--
283
619 $ 263,648
Total. ........................................................... $182,450
$ 1,989
$ 6,756 $ 177,683
$260,533
$ 3,734
$
Amortized
Cost
December 31, 2002
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
(Dollars in thousands)
Fair
Value
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations
of U.S. government agencies..........................
$ 18,511
$
70% non-taxable preferred stock .......................
States and political subdivisions ........................
Collateralized mortgage obligations ..................
Mortgage-backed securities................................
Qualified Zone Academy Bond (QZAB)...........
44,029
19,115
18,616
196,887
8,000
65
--
1,808
596
2,600
--
Total. ..........................................................
$305,158
$ 5,069
$ 1,008
$
--
884
--
14
$ 18,576
43,145
20,923
19,198
110
199,377
--
8,000
$309,219
The following tables present the amortized cost and fair value of securities classified as held-to-maturity at December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002:
December 31, 2004
Amortized Unrealized
Cost
Gains
Gross
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
(Dollars in thousands)
Fair
Value
Amortized
Cost
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations
of U.S. government agencies..................... $ 20,147
$
States and political subdivisions ...................
23,317
Corporate debt securities ...............................
10,491
Collateralized mortgage obligations. ............
225,851
661
510
301
97
$
6
15
--
$ 20,802
$ 32,938
23,812
30,597
10,792
15,619
802
225,146
160,742
December 31, 2003
Gross
Gross
Unrealized
Unrealized
Gains
Losses
(Dollars in thousands)
$ 1,591
1,121
743
1,338
7,806
$
14
--
--
191
3,175
Fair
Value
$ 34,515
31,718
16,362
161,889
877,967
843,948
873,336
$1,124,500
$1,113,232
$12,599 $ 3,380 $1,122,451
Mortgage-backed securities...........................
845,303
3,559
Total ....................................................... $1,125,109
$ 5,128
4,914
$ 5,737
34
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations
of U.S. government agencies..........................
States and political subdivisions ........................
Corporate debt securities ....................................
Collateralized mortgage obligations ..................
Mortgage-backed securities................................
Total...................................................................
Amortized
Cost
$ 78,587
31,879
25,338
149,666
355,628
$ 641,098
December 31, 2002
Gross
Unrealized Unrealized
Gross
Gains
Losses
(Dollars in thousands)
Fair
Value
$ 3,131
$
1,241
942
1,662
12,297
$ 19,273
--
6
$ 81,718
33,114
87
26,193
12
5
151,316
367,920
$
110
$ 660,261
Mortgage-backed securities are securities that have been developed by pooling a number of real estate mortgages and which
are principally issued by federal agencies such as Government National Mortgage Association (Ginnie Mae), Fannie Mae and Freddie
Mac. These securities are deemed to have high credit ratings, and minimum regular monthly cash flows of principal and interest are
guaranteed by the issuing agencies.
Unlike U.S. Treasury and U.S. government agency securities, which have a lump sum payment at maturity, mortgage-backed
securities provide cash flows from regular principal and interest payments and principal prepayments throughout the lives of the
securities. Mortgage-backed securities which are purchased at a premium will generally suffer decreasing net yields as interest rates
drop because home owners tend to refinance their mortgages. Thus, the premium paid must be amortized over a shorter period.
Therefore, these securities purchased at a discount will obtain higher net yields in a decreasing interest rate environment. As interest
rates rise, the opposite will generally be true. During a period of increasing interest rates, fixed rate mortgage-backed securities do not
tend to experience heavy prepayments of principal and consequently, the average life of this security will not be shortened. If interest
rates begin to fall, prepayments will increase. At December 31, 2004, 38.1% of the mortgage-backed securities held by the Company
had contractual final maturities of more than ten years with a weighted average life of 3.75 years.
Collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs) are bonds that are backed by pools of mortgages. The pools can be Ginnie Mae,
Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac pools or they can be private-label pools. CMOs are designed so that the mortgage collateral will generate
a cash flow sufficient to provide for the timely repayment of the bonds. The mortgage collateral pool can be structured to
accommodate various desired bond repayment schedules, provided that the collateral cash flow is adequate to meet scheduled bond
payments. This is accomplished by dividing the bonds into classes to which payments on the underlying mortgage pools are allocated
in different order. The bond’s cash flow, for example can be dedicated to one class of bondholders at a time, thereby increasing call
protection to bondholders. In private-label CMOs, losses on underlying mortgages are directed to the most junior of all classes and
then to the classes above in order of increasing seniority, which means that the senior classes have enough credit protection to be
given the highest credit rating by the rating agencies.
At the date of purchase, the Company is required to classify debt and equity securities into one of three categories: held-to-
maturity, trading or available-for-sale. At each reporting date, the appropriateness of the classification is reassessed. Investments in
debt securities are classified as held-to-maturity and measured at amortized cost in the financial statements only if management has
the positive intent and ability to hold those securities to maturity. Securities that are bought and held principally for the purpose of
selling them in the near term are classified as trading and measured at fair value in the financial statements with unrealized gains and
losses included in earnings. Investments not classified as either held-to-maturity or trading are classified as available-for-sale and
measured at fair value in the financial statements with unrealized gains and losses reported, net of tax, in a separate component of
shareholders' equity until realized.
Deposits
The Company’s lending and investment activities are primarily funded by deposits. The Company offers a variety of deposit
accounts having a wide range of interest rates and terms including demand, savings, money market and time accounts. The Company
relies primarily on competitive pricing policies and customer service to attract and retain these deposits. The Company does not have
or accept any brokered deposits.
Total deposits at December 31, 2004 were $2.32 billion, an increase of $233.3 million or 11.2% from $2.08 billion at
December 31, 2003. The increase is primarily attributable to internal growth and the Liberty and Village acquisitions in 2004. As of
December 31, 2004, the banking centers acquired in 2004 had approximately $227.0 million in total deposits. Noninterest-bearing
deposits of $518.4 million at December 31, 2004 increased $51.0 million or 10.9% from $467.4 million at December 31, 2003.
35
Noninterest-bearing deposits at December 31, 2003 were $467.4 million compared with $327.7 million at December 31, 2002.
Interest-bearing deposits at December 31, 2004 were $1.80 billion, up $182.4 million or 11.3% from $1.62 billion at December 31,
2003. Interest-bearing deposits at December 31, 2003 of $1.62 billion represented a $357.5 million or 28.4% increase from $1.26
billion at December 31, 2002. Total deposits at December 31, 2002 were $1.59 billion.
The daily average balances and weighted average rates paid on deposits for each of the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003
and 2002 are presented below:
Years Ended December 31,
2004
2003
2002
Amount
Rate
Amount
Rate
(Dollars in thousands)
Amount
Rate
Interest-bearing checking..............................................
Regular savings. ...........................................................
Money market savings..................................................
Time deposits. ..............................................................
Total interest-bearing deposits...........................
Noninterest-bearing deposits ........................................
Total deposits.....................................................
$ 485,557
110,801
384,529
735,095
1,715,982
473,713
$2,189,695
1.04%
0.59
0.87
2.12
1.43
--
1.12%
$ 371,801
88,651
317,682
616,353
1,394,487
354,558
$1,749,045
1.13%
0.66
0.92
2.42
1.62
--
1.29%
$ 249,045
58,218
257,499
505,796
1,070,558
230,326
$1,300,884
1.27 %
1.41
1.71
3.28
2.33
--
1.92 %
The Company’s ratio of average noninterest-bearing deposits to average total deposits for the years ended December 31,
2004, 2003, and 2002 was 21.6%, 20.3%, and 17.7%, respectively.
The following table sets forth the amount of the Company's certificates of deposit that are $100,000 or greater by time
remaining until maturity:
Three months or less..............................................................
Over three through six months...............................................
Over six through 12 months...................................................
Over 12 months .....................................................................
Total................................................................................
Other Borrowings
December 31, 2004
(Dollars in thousands)
$ 174,012
68,672
73,199
95,407
$ 411,290
The Company utilizes borrowings to supplement deposits to fund its lending and investment activities. Borrowings consist of
funds from the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) and correspondent banks. At December 31, 2004, the Company had $13.1
million in FHLB borrowings compared with $11.9 million in FHLB borrowings at December 31, 2003, all of which consisted of long-
term FHLB notes payable. The $1.2 million increase is attributable to the acquisition of one note from Village Bank and Trust, ssb,
partially offset by normal pay downs on the remaining notes. The maturity dates on the FHLB notes payable range from 2004 to 2028
and the interest rates range from 4.64% to 6.48%. FHLB advances are considered short-term, overnight borrowings. The Company
had no FHLB advances outstanding at December 31, 2004 and 2003. The highest outstanding balance of FHLB advances during 2004
was $50.0 million compared with $59.3 million during 2003. The Company had no federal funds purchased at December 31, 2004 or
2003.
At December 31, 2004, the Company had $25.1 million in securities sold under repurchase agreements compared with $19.0
million at December 31, 2003, an increase of $6.1 million or 31.8%. The increase is primarily attributable to the Liberty acquisition.
36
At December 31, 2004, the Company had four issues of junior subordinated debentures outstanding totaling $47.4 million as
shown in the following table:
Description
Issuance Date
Trust
Preferred
Securities
Outstanding
Prosperity Statutory Trust II
July 31, 2001
$15,000,000
Paradigm Capital Trust II (1)
Aug. 31, 2002
6,000,000
Junior
Subordinated
Debt Owed
to Trusts
Maturity
Date
$15,464,000
July 31, 2031
6,186,000 Feb. 20, 2031
Interest Rate
3-month LIBOR
+ 3.58%, not to
exceed 12.50%
3-month LIBOR
+ 4.50%
Prosperity Statutory Trust III
Aug. 15, 2003
12,500,000
6.50%(2)
12,887,000 Sept. 17, 2033
Prosperity Statutory Trust IV
Dec. 30, 2003
12,500,000
6.50%(3)
12,887,000 Dec. 30, 2033
______________________________
(1) Assumed in connection with the Paradigm acquisition on September 1, 2002.
(2) The debentures bear a fixed interest rate until September 17, 2008, when the rate begins to float on a quarterly basis based on the
three-month LIBOR plus 3.00%.
(3) The debentures bear a fixed interest rate until December 30, 2008, when the rate begins to float on a quarterly basis based on the
three-month LIBOR plus 2.85%.
On December 31, 2004, the Company redeemed in full the $12.4 million in junior subordinated debentures issued to
Prosperity Capital Trust I. Prosperity Capital Trust I in turn redeemed in full the trust preferred securities and common securities it
issued.
Each of the trusts is a capital or statutory business trust organized for the sole purpose of issuing trust securities and investing
the proceeds in the Company's junior subordinated debentures. The preferred trust securities of each trust represent preferred
beneficial interests in the assets of the respective trusts and are subject to mandatory redemption upon payment of the junior
subordinated debentures held by the trust. The common securities of each trust are wholly-owned by the Company. Each trust's ability
to pay amounts due on the trust preferred securities is solely dependent upon the Company making payment on the related junior
subordinated debentures. The debentures, which are the only assets of each trust, are subordinate and junior in right of payment to all
of the Company's present and future senior indebtedness. The Company has fully and unconditionally guaranteed each trust's
obligations under the trust securities issued by each respective trust to the extent not paid or made by each trust, provided such trust
has funds available for such obligations.
Under the provisions of each issue of the debentures, the Company has the right to defer payment of interest on the
debentures at any time, or from time to time, for periods not exceeding five years. If interest payments on either issue of the
debentures are deferred, the distributions on the applicable trust preferred securities and common securities will also be deferred.
In late 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Interpretation No. 46R (FIN 46R), "Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities, an interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51 (Revised December 2003)." FIN 46R requires that
trust preferred securities be deconsolidated from the Company's consolidated financial statements. The Company adopted FIN 46R on
January 1, 2004 and as a result, no longer reflects the trust preferred securities in its consolidated financial statements. Instead, the
junior subordinated debentures are shown as liabilities in the Company's consolidated balance sheets and interest expense associated
with the junior subordinated debentures is shown as interest expense in the Company's consolidated statements of income.
37
Interest Rate Sensitivity and Market Risk
The Company's asset liability and funds management policy provides management with the necessary guidelines for effective
funds management, and the Company has established a measurement system for monitoring its net interest rate sensitivity position.
The Company manages its sensitivity position within established guidelines.
As a financial institution, the Company's primary component of market risk is interest rate volatility. Fluctuations in interest
rates will ultimately impact both the level of income and expense recorded on most of the Company's assets and liabilities, and the
market value of all interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, other than those which have a short term to maturity. Interest
rate risk is the potential of economic losses due to future interest rate changes. These economic losses can be reflected as a loss of
future net interest income and/or a loss of current fair market values. The objective is to measure the effect on net interest income and
to adjust the balance sheet to minimize the inherent risk while at the same time maximizing income.
The Company manages its exposure to interest rates by structuring its balance sheet in the ordinary course of business. The
Company does not enter into instruments such as leveraged derivatives, interest rate swaps, financial options, financial future contracts
or forward delivery contracts for the purpose of reducing interest rate risk. Based upon the nature of the Company's operations, the
Company is not subject to foreign exchange or commodity price risk. The Company does not own any trading assets.
The Company's exposure to interest rate risk is managed by the Asset Liability Committee (“ALCO”), which is composed of
senior officers of the Company, in accordance with policies approved by the Company's Board of Directors. The ALCO formulates
strategies based on appropriate levels of interest rate risk. In determining the appropriate level of interest rate risk, the ALCO
considers the impact on earnings and capital of the current outlook on interest rates, potential changes in interest rates, regional
economies, liquidity, business strategies and other factors. The ALCO meets regularly to review, among other things, the sensitivity of
assets and liabilities to interest rate changes, the book and market values of assets and liabilities, unrealized gains and losses, purchase
and sale activities, commitments to originate loans and the maturities of investments and borrowings. Additionally, the ALCO reviews
liquidity, cash flow flexibility, maturities of deposits and consumer and commercial deposit activity. Management uses two
methodologies to manage interest rate risk: (1) an analysis of relationships between interest-earning assets and interest-bearing
liabilities; and (2) an interest rate shock simulation model. The Company has traditionally managed its business to reduce its overall
exposure to changes in interest rates.
An interest rate sensitive asset or liability is one that, within a defined time period, either matures or experiences an interest
rate change in line with general market interest rates. The management of interest rate risk is performed by analyzing the maturity and
repricing relationships between interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities at specific points in time (“GAP”) and by
analyzing the effects of interest rate changes on net interest income over specific periods of time by projecting the performance of the
mix of assets and liabilities in varied interest rate environments. Interest rate sensitivity reflects the potential effect on net interest
income of a movement in interest rates. A company is considered to be asset sensitive, or having a positive GAP, when the amount of
its interest-earning assets maturing or repricing within a given period exceeds the amount of its interest-bearing liabilities also
maturing or repricing within that time period. Conversely, a company is considered to be liability sensitive, or having a negative GAP,
when the amount of its interest-bearing liabilities maturing or repricing within a given period exceeds the amount of its interest-
earning assets also maturing or repricing within that time period. During a period of rising interest rates, a negative GAP would tend to
affect net interest income adversely, while a positive GAP would tend to result in an increase in net interest income. During a period
of falling interest rates, a negative GAP would tend to result in an increase in net interest income, while a positive GAP would tend to
affect net interest income adversely.
38
The following table sets forth the Company’s interest rate sensitivity analysis at December 31, 2004:
Volumes Subject to Repricing Within
0-30
days
31-180
days
181-365
days
Greater than
one year
Total
(Dollars in thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Securities (excluding unrealized loss of $4.8 million) $
Loans. ...................................................................
Federal funds sold and other earning assets ..........
Total interest-earning assets.......................
49,005
439,646
79,250
$ 567,901
$ 154,025
111,914
100
$ 266,039
$ 185,213
91,269
--
$ 276,482
$ 919,316
392,684
--
$1,312,000
$1,307,559
1,035,513
79,350
$2,422,422
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Demand, money market and savings
deposits.............................................................
$ 1,026,120
$
--
$
--
$
--
$1,026,121
Certificates of deposit and other
time deposits.....................................................
Junior subordinated debentures............................
Securities sold under repurchase agreements.......
FHLB advances and FHLB notes payable ............
Total interest-bearing liabilities........................
126,910
22,774
25,058
52
$ 1,200,914
288,740
--
--
262
$ 289,002
160,358
--
--
323
$ 160,681
196,590
24,650
--
12,479
$ 233,719
Period GAP......................................................
Cumulative GAP..............................................
Period GAP to total assets. ..............................
Cumulative GAP to total assets. ......................
$
$
(633,013 )
(633,013 )
$ (22,963 )
$ (655,976 )
$ 115,801
$(540,175 )
$1,078,281
$ 538,106
(23.47 ) %
(23.47 ) %
(0.85 ) %
(24.32 ) %
4.29 %
(20.03 ) %
39.98 %
19.95 %
772,598
47,424
25,058
13,116
$1,884,317
$ 538,106
While the GAP position is a useful tool in measuring interest rate risk and contributes toward effective asset and liability
management, it is difficult to predict the effect of changing interest rates solely on that measure, without accounting for alterations in
the maturity or repricing characteristics of the balance sheet that occur during changes in market interest rates. For example, the GAP
position reflects only the prepayment assumptions pertaining to the current rate environment. Assets tend to prepay more rapidly
during periods of declining interest rates than during periods of rising interest rates. Because of this and other risk factors not
contemplated by the GAP position, an institution could have a matched GAP position in the current rate environment and still have its
net interest income exposed to increased rate risk. Additionally, the Company had $518.4 million in noninterest bearing deposits at
December 31, 2004 which are not reflected in the table above and are not directly impacted by interest rate changes.
In addition to GAP analysis, the Company uses an interest rate risk simulation model and shock analysis to test the interest
rate sensitivity of net interest income and the balance sheet, respectively. Contractual maturities and repricing opportunities of loans
are incorporated in the model as are prepayment assumptions, maturity data and call options within the investment portfolio.
Assumptions based on past experience are incorporated into the model for nonmaturity deposit accounts. Based on the Company's
December 31, 2004 simulation analysis, the Company estimates that its current net interest income would decrease by approximately
4.60% over the next twelve months assuming an immediate 100 basis point decline in rates and increase by approximately 1.7% over
the next twelve months assuming an immediate 100 basis point increase in rates. The Company estimates that its current net interest
income would decrease by approximately 12.6% over the next twelve months assuming an immediate 200 basis point decline in rates
and increase by approximately 2.3% over the next twelve months assuming an immediate 200 basis point increase in rates. The
results are primarily from the behavior of demand, money market and savings deposits. The Company has found that historically,
interest rates on these deposits change more slowly than changes in the discount and federal funds rates. This assumption is
incorporated into the simulation model and is generally not fully reflected in a GAP analysis.
Liquidity
Liquidity involves the Company's ability to raise funds to support asset growth or reduce assets to meet deposit withdrawals
and other payment obligations, to maintain reserve requirements and otherwise to operate the Company on an ongoing basis. During
the three years ended December 31, 2004, the Company's liquidity needs have primarily been met by growth in core deposits and the
issuance of junior subordinated debentures, as previously discussed. Although access to purchased funds from correspondent banks is
available and has been utilized on occasion to take advantage of investment opportunities, the Company does not generally rely on
these external funding sources. The cash and federal funds sold position, supplemented by amortizing investment and loan portfolios,
have generally created an adequate liquidity position.
39
Asset liquidity is provided by cash and assets which are readily marketable or which will mature in the near future. As of
December 31, 2004, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $137.9 million, up from $83.7 million, at December 31, 2003.
The increase was mainly due to an increase in federal funds sold of $67.4 million, partially offset by a decrease in cash of $13.2
million. As of December 31, 2004, the Company had junior subordinated debentures outstanding of $47.4 million compared with
$59.8 million at December 31, 2003.
Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes the Company’s contractual obligations and other commitments to make future payments as
of December 31, 2004 (other than deposit obligations). The Company’s future cash payments associated with its contractual
obligations pursuant to its junior subordinated debentures, FHLB notes payable and operating leases as of December 31, 2004 are
summarized below. Payments for FHLB notes payable include interest of $6.1 million that will be paid over the future periods.
Payments related to leases are based on actual payments specified in underlying contracts.
1 year or less
More than 1
year but less
than 3 years
Payments due in:
3 years or
more but less
than 5 years
(Dollars in thousands)
5 years
or more
Junior subordinated debentures..............................
Federal Home Loan Bank notes payable...............
Operating leases....................................................
Total...........................................................
$
$
--
1,575
2,028
3,603
$
$
--
4,823
3,643
8,466
$
$
--
2,377
2,521
4,898
$
$
47,424
10,464
2,548
60,436
Off-Balance Sheet Items
Total
$ 47,424
19,239
10,740
$ 77,403
In the normal course of business, the Company enters into various transactions, which, in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States, are not included in its consolidated balance sheets. The Company enters into these
transactions to meet the financing needs of its customers. These transactions include commitments to extend credit and standby letters
of credit, which involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk and interest rate risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the
consolidated balance sheets.
The Company’s commitments associated with outstanding standby letters of credit and commitments to extend credit as of
December 31, 2004 are summarized below. Since commitments associated with letters of credit and commitments to extend credit
may expire unused, the amounts shown do not necessarily reflect the actual future cash funding requirements:
1 year or less
More than 1
year but less
than 3 years
3 years or
more but less
than 5 years
(Dollars in thousands)
5 years
or more
Total
Standby letters of credit .........................................
Commitments to extend credit ...............................
Total...........................................................
$
5,307
119,400
$ 124,707
$
$
548
17,938
18,486
$
$
8
1,739
1,747
$
$
--
51,768
51,768
5,863
$
190,845
$ 196,708
Standby Letters of Credit. Standby letters of credit are written conditional commitments issued by the Company to
guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. In the event the customer does not perform in accordance with the terms of
the agreement with the third party, the Company would be required to fund the commitment. The maximum potential amount of future
payments the Company could be required to make is represented by the contractual amount of the commitment. If the commitment is
funded, the Company would be entitled to seek recovery from the customer. The Company’s policies generally require that standby
letter of credit arrangements contain security and debt covenants similar to those contained in loan agreements.
Commitments to Extend Credit. The Company enters into contractual commitments to extend credit, normally with fixed
expiration dates or termination clauses, at specified rates and for specific purposes. Substantially all of the Company’s commitments
to extend credit are contingent upon customers maintaining specific credit standards at the time of loan funding. The Company
minimizes its exposure to loss under these commitments by subjecting them to credit approval and monitoring procedures.
Management assesses the credit risk associated with certain commitments to extend credit in determining the level of the allowance
for credit losses.
40
Capital Resources
Capital management consists of providing equity to support the Company’s current and future operations. The Company is
subject to capital adequacy requirements imposed by the Federal Reserve Board and the Bank is subject to capital adequacy
requirements imposed by the FDIC. Both the Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC have adopted risk-based capital requirements for
assessing bank holding company and bank capital adequacy. These standards define capital and establish minimum capital
requirements in relation to assets and off-balance sheet exposure, adjusted for credit risk. The risk-based capital standards currently in
effect are designed to make regulatory capital requirements more sensitive to differences in risk profiles among bank holding
companies and banks, to account for off-balance sheet exposure and to minimize disincentives for holding liquid assets. Assets and
off-balance sheet items are assigned to broad risk categories, each with appropriate relative risk weights. The resulting capital ratios
represent capital as a percentage of total risk-weighted assets and off-balance sheet items.
The risk-based capital standards issued by the Federal Reserve Board require all bank holding companies to have “Tier 1
capital” of at least 4.0% and “total risk-based” capital (Tier 1 and Tier 2) of at least 8.0% of total risk-weighted tangible assets. “Tier 1
capital” generally includes common shareholders' equity and qualifying perpetual preferred stock together with related surpluses and
retained earnings, less deductions for goodwill and various other intangibles. “Tier 2 capital” may consist of a limited amount of
intermediate-term preferred stock, a limited amount of term subordinated debt, certain hybrid capital instruments and other debt
securities, perpetual preferred stock not qualifying as Tier 1 capital, and a limited amount of the general valuation allowance for loan
losses. The sum of Tier 1 capital and Tier 2 capital is “total risk-based capital.”
The Federal Reserve Board has also adopted guidelines which supplement the risk-based capital guidelines with a minimum
ratio of Tier 1 capital to average total consolidated tangible assets, or “leverage ratio,” of 3.0% for institutions with well diversified
risk, including no undue interest rate exposure; excellent asset quality; high liquidity; good earnings; and that are generally considered
to be strong banking organizations, rated composite 1 under applicable federal guidelines, and that are not experiencing or anticipating
significant growth. Other banking organizations are required to maintain a leverage ratio of at least 4.0%. These rules further provide
that banking organizations experiencing internal growth or making acquisitions will be expected to maintain capital positions
substantially above the minimum supervisory levels and comparable to peer group averages, without significant reliance on intangible
assets.
Pursuant to FDICIA, each federal banking agency revised its risk-based capital standards to ensure that those standards take
adequate account of interest rate risk, concentration of credit risk and the risks of nontraditional activities, as well as reflect the actual
performance and expected risk of loss on multifamily mortgages. The Bank is subject to capital adequacy guidelines of the FDIC that
are substantially similar to the Federal Reserve Board's guidelines. Also pursuant to FDICIA, the FDIC has promulgated regulations
setting the levels at which an insured institution such as the Bank would be considered “well capitalized,” “adequately capitalized,”
“undercapitalized,” “significantly undercapitalized” and “critically undercapitalized.” Under the FDIC's regulations, the Bank is
classified “well capitalized” for purposes of prompt corrective action.
Total shareholders' equity increased to $275.6 million at December 31, 2004 from $219.6 million at December 31, 2003, an
increase of $56.1 million or 25.5%. This increase was primarily the result of net income of $34.7 million and an increase in Common
Stock issued of $32.0 million in connection with the Liberty acquisition, partially offset by dividends paid on the Common Stock of
$6.7 million. During 2003, shareholders' equity increased by $64.9 million or 41.9% from $154.7 million at December 31, 2002 due
primarily to net income of $26.5 million and an increase in Common Stock issued of $43.6 million in connection with the
MainBancorp and FSBNT acquisitions partially offset by dividends paid on the Common Stock of $4.9 million.
41
The following table provides a comparison of the Company's and the Bank's leverage and risk-weighted capital ratios as of
December 31, 2004 to the minimum and well capitalized regulatory standards:
Minimum Required
for Capital
Adequacy Purposes
To Be Categorized as
Well Capitalized Under Prompt
Corrective Action
Provisions
Actual Ratio at
December 31, 2004
The Company
Leverage ratio. .............................................
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio ......................
Total risk-based capital ratio........................
The Bank
Leverage ratio. .............................................
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio ......................
Total risk-based capital ratio........................
____________________
3.00% (1)
4.00
8.00
3.00% (2)
4.00
8.00
N/A
N/A
N/A
5.00 %
6.00
10.00
6.30 %
13.56
14.67
6.07 %
13.09
14.20
(1)
(2)
The Federal Reserve Board may require the Company to maintain a leverage ratio above the required minimum.
The FDIC may require the Bank to maintain a leverage ratio above the required minimum.
The trust preferred securities issued by the trusts are currently included in the Company's Tier 1 capital for regulatory purposes.
On March 1, 2005, the Federal Reserve Board adopted final rules that continue to allow trust preferred securities to be included in Tier 1
capital, subject to stricter quantitative and qualitative limits. Currently, trust preferred securities and qualifying perpetual preferred stock
are limited in the aggregate to no more than 25% of a bank holding company's core capital elements. The new rule amends the existing
limit by providing that restricted core capital elements (including trust preferred securities and qualifying perpetual preferred stock) can
be no more than 25% of core capital, net of goodwill and associated deferred tax liability. Because the 25% limit currently is calculated
without deducting goodwill, the final rule reduces the amount of trust preferred securities that the Company can include in Tier 1 capital.
The amount of such excess trust preferred securities are includable in Tier 2 capital. The new quantitative limits will be fully effective
March 31, 2009.
Assuming these final rules were effective at December 31, 2004, approximately $38.0 million of trust preferred securities would
count as Tier 1 capital. The excess amount of trust preferred securities may be included in Tier 2 capital. Assuming these final rules were
effective at December 31, 2004, the Company's consolidated capital ratios would have been:
Pro forma Consolidated Risk Based Capital Ratios:
Total capital (to risk weighted assets)....................
Tier I capital (to risk weighted assets) ...................
Tier I captital (to average assets) ...........................
14.67%
12.89%
5.99%
Each of the trusts issuing the trust preferred securities holds junior subordinated debentures the Company issued with a 30-year
maturity. The final rules provide that in the last five years before the junior subordinated debentures mature, the associated trust preferred
securities will be excluded from Tier 1 capital and included in Tier 2 capital. In addition, the trust preferred securities during this five-
year period would be amortized out of Tier 2 capital by one-fifth each year and excluded from Tier 2 capital completely during the year
prior to maturity of the debentures.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
For information regarding the market risk of the Company’s financial instruments, see “Item 7. Management’s Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation – Financial Condition - Interest Rate Sensitivity and Market
Risk”. The Company’s principal market risk exposure is to changes in interest rates.
42
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The financial statements, the reports thereon, the notes thereto and supplementary data commence at page 51 of this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.
The following table presents certain unaudited quarterly financial information concerning the Company’s results of
operations for each of the two years indicated below. The information should be read in conjunction with the historical consolidated
financial statements of the Company and the notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
CONSOLIDATED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA OF THE COMPANY
Quarter Ended 2004
(unaudited)
December 31
September 30
June 30
March 31
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Interest income............................................
Interest expense...........................................
Net interest income ................................
Provision for credit losses...........................
Net interest income after provision ........
Noninterest income .....................................
Noninterest expense ....................................
Income before income taxes ..................
Provision for income taxes..........................
Net income..................................................
Earnings per share:
Basic ......................................................
Diluted ...................................................
$ 30,308
8,106
22,202
220
21,982
6,233
13,987
14,228
4,892
$ 9,336
$ 0.417
$ 0.412
$ 28,763
7,696
21,067
420
20,647
6,111
13,194
13,564
4,618
$ 8,946
$ 0.410
$ 0.405
$ 26,313
6,962
19,351
120
19,231
5,455
12,067
12,619
4,257
$ 8,362
$ 26,372
7,025
19,347
120
19,227
5,272
12,459
12,040
3,977
$ 8,063
$ 0.399
$ 0.394
$ 0.385
$ 0.380
Quarter Ended 2003
(unaudited)
December 31
September 30
June 30
March 31
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Interest income............................................
Interest expense...........................................
Net interest income ................................
Provision for credit losses...........................
Net interest income after provision ........
Noninterest income .....................................
Noninterest expense ....................................
Income before income taxes ..................
Provision for income taxes..........................
Net income.............................................
Earnings per share:
Basic ......................................................
Diluted ...................................................
$ 25,054
6,650
18,404
123
18,281
4,796
12,458
10,619
3,427
$ 7,192
$ 0.359
$ 0.353
$ 21,365
6,375
14,990
120
14,870
4,326
9,707
9,489
3,019
$ 6,470
$ 0.341
$ 0.336
$ 22,214
6,653
15,561
120
15,441
4,005
9,925
9,521
3,024
$ 6,497
$ 22,212
6,668
15,544
120
15,424
3,839
9,931
9,332
2,943
$ 6,389
$ 0.343
$ 0.338
$ 0.338
$ 0.333
43
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL
DISCLOSURE
There have been no disagreements with accountants on any matter of accounting principles or practices or financial statement
disclosures during the two year period ended December 31, 2004.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, an evaluation was carried out by the Company’s
management, with the participation of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based upon that
evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were
effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.
No changes were made to the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934) during the last fiscal quarter that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial
reporting. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision of the Company’s
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of the Company’s financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles.
As of December 31, 2004, management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting
based on the criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting established in “Internal Control — Integrated Framework,”
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO) of the Treadway Commission. This assessment included controls over
the preparation of the schedules equivalent to the basic financial statements in accordance with the instructions for the Consolidated
Financial Statements for Bank Holding Companies (Form FRY-9C) to meet the reporting requirements of Section 112 of the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act. Based on the assessment, management determined that the Company maintained
effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on those criteria.
Deloitte & Touche, LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited the consolidated financial statements of
the Company included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, has issued an attestation report on management’s assessment of the
effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004. The report is included in this Item
under the heading “Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.”
44
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Prosperity Bancshares, Inc.
Houston, Texas
We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting, that Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) maintained effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee
of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Because management’s assessment and our audit were conducted to meet
the reporting requirements of Section 112 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act (FDICIA), management’s
assessment and our audit of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting included controls over the preparation of the
schedules equivalent to the basic financial statements in accordance with the instructions for the Consolidated Financial Statements
for Bank Holding Companies (Form FR Y-9C). The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control
over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over
financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over
financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing, and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal
control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinions.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal
executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company’s board of directors,
management, and other personnel to prove reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control
over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management
and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improver
management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to
the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies
or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, management’s assessment that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2004, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Also, in our opinion, the Company
maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on the criteria
established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission.
45
We have not examined and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance on management’s statement
referring to compliance with laws and regulations.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2004 of the Company and our report dated March 8,
2005, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.
Houston, Texas
March 8, 2005
PART III.
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The information under the captions “Election of Directors,” “Continuing Directors and Executive Officers”, “Section 16(a)
Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance”, “Corporate Governance and Nominating Procedures-Committees of the Board of
Directors-Audit Committee” and “Corporate Governance and Nominating Procedures-Code of Ethics” in the Company’s definitive
Proxy Statement for its 2005 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “2005 Proxy Statement”) to be filed with the Commission pursuant
to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is incorporated herein by reference in response to this
item.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information under the caption “Executive Compensation and Other Matters” in the 2005 Proxy Statement is incorporated
herein by reference in response to this item.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The information under the caption “Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock by Management of the Company and Principal
Shareholders” in the 2005 Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference in response to this item.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The information under the caption “Interests of Management and Others in Certain Transactions” in the 2005 Proxy
Statement is incorporated herein by reference in response to this item.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
The information under the caption “Fees and Services of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the 2005 Proxy
Statement is incorporated herein by reference in response to this item.
46
PART IV.
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedules
Reference is made to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the reports thereon, the notes thereto and supplementary data
commencing at page 51 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Set forth below is a list of such Consolidated Financial Statements:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2004 and 2003
Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Financial Statement Schedules
All supplemental schedules are omitted as inapplicable or because the required information is included in the Consolidated
Financial Statements or notes thereto.
Exhibits
Each exhibit marked with an asterisk is filed with this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Exhibit
Number (1)
Description
2.1 - Agreement and Plan of Reorganization, dated as of October 25, 2004, by and between the
Company and First Capital Bankers, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the
Company's Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Registration No. 333-121767)).
2.2
- Agreement and Plan of Reorganization dated as of May 1, 2002 by and between Prosperity
Bancshares, Inc. and Paradigm Bancorporation, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
2.1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Registration No. 333-91248))
2.3
-
Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of February 22, 2002 by and between Prosperity Bancshares,
Inc. and American Bancorp of Oklahoma, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to
the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2002)
2.4
2.5
2.6
2.7
- Agreement and Plan of Reorganization dated as of April 26, 2002 by and among Prosperity
Bancshares, Inc., Prosperity Bank and The First State Bank (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 2.2 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2002)
- Agreement and Plan of Reorganization by and between the Prosperity Bancshares, Inc and
Commercial Bancshares, Inc. dated November 8, 2000 (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Registration No. 333-52342))
- Agreement and Plan of Reorganization by and between Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. and South
Texas Bancshares, Inc. dated June 17, 1999 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the
Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1999)
- Agreement and Plan of Reorganization dated June 5, 1998 by and among Prosperity, Prosperity
Bank and Union State Bank (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-63267))
3.1
- Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Prosperity (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-63267))
47
3.2
- Amended and Restated Bylaws of Prosperity (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to
the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2001)
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
-
-
Form of certificate representing shares of Prosperity common stock (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 4 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No.
333-63267))
Indenture dated as of July 31, 2001 by and between Prosperity Bancshares, Inc., as Issuer, and
State Street Bank and Trust Company of Connecticut, National Association, with respect to the
Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures of Prosperity Bancshares, Inc.
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2001)
- Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of Prosperity Statutory Trust II dated as of July 31,
2001 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2001)
- Guarantee Agreement dated as of July 31, 2001 by and between Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. and
State Street Bank and Trust Company of Connecticut, National Association (incorporated herein
by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2001)
10.1┼
10.2┼
-
-
Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. 1995 Stock Option Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
10.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-63267))
Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. 1998 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
10.2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-63267))
10.3┼ -
Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
10.2 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Registration No. 333-121767))
10.4┼ - Amended and Restated Employment Agreement by and between Prosperity Bank and David
Zalman (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on
Form 8-K dated January 18, 2005)
10.5┼ - Amended and Restated Employment Agreement by and between Prosperity Bank and H. E.
Timanus, Jr. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Current Report on
Form 8-K dated January 18, 2005)
10.6┼ - Employment Agreement between the Company, Prosperity Bank and D. Michael Hunter
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company's Registration Statement on
Form S-4 (Registration No. 333-121767))
10.7┼
10.8┼
10.9┼
- Commercial Bancshares, Inc. Incentive Stock Option Plan for Key Employees (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8
(Registration No. 333-57238))
-
-
Form of Stock Option Agreement under the Commercial Bancshares, Inc. Incentive Stock Option
Plan for Key Employees (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to the Company's
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-57238))
Paradigm Bancorporation, Inc. 1999 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-100815))
10.10┼
- MainBancorp, Inc. 1996 Employee Stock Option Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
4.2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-110755))
48
10.11┼
-
Form of MainBancorp, Inc. Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No.
333-110755))
10.12┼* -
First Capital Bankers, Inc. 1996 Executive Stock Option Plan
10.13┼* - First Capital Bankers, Inc. Amended and Restated 1998 Stock Option Plan
21.1*
-
Subsidiaries of Prosperity Bancshares, Inc.
23.1*
- Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP
31.1*
- Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended.
31.2*
- Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended.
32.1*
- Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2*
- Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
-----------------------------------------
┼ Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
* Filed with this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(1) The Company has other long-term debt agreements that meet the exclusion set forth in Section 601(b)(4)(iii)(A)
of Regulation S-K. The Company hereby agrees to furnish a copy of such agreements to the Commission upon
request.
49
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Prosperity Bancshares, Inc., has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Houston and
State of Texas on March 14, 2005.
PROSPERITY BANCSHARES, INC.®
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this report has been signed by the following
persons on behalf of the registrant in the indicated capacities on March 14, 2005.
By: /s/DAVID ZALMAN
David Zalman
President and Chief Executive Officer
Signature
/s/DAVID ZALMAN
David Zalman
/s/NED S. HOLMES
Ned S. Holmes
/s/DAVID HOLLAWAY
David Hollaway
/s/H.E. TIMANUS, JR.
H.E. Timanus, Jr.
/s/JAMES A. BOULIGNY
James A. Bouligny
/s/CHARLES A. DAVIS, JR.
Charles A. Davis, Jr.
/s/WILLIAM H. FAGAN, M.D.
William Fagan, M.D.
/s/CHARLES J. HOWARD, M.D.
Charles Howard, M.D.
D. Michael Hunter
S. Reed Morian
/s/PERRY MUELLER, JR., D.D.S.
Perry Mueller, Jr., D.D.S.
/s/A. VIRGIL PACE, JR.
A. Virgil Pace, Jr.
/s/TRACY T. RUDOLPH
Tracy T. Rudolph
/s/HARRISON STAFFORD II
Harrison Stafford II
/s/ROBERT STEELHAMMER
Robert Steelhammer
Positions
President and Chief Executive Officer (principal
executive officer); Director
Chairman of the Board; Director
Chief Financial Officer (principal
financial officer and principal
accounting officer)
Executive Vice President and
Chief Operating Officer; Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
50
TABLE OF CONTENTS TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
®
Prosperity Bancshares, Inc.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm ...............................
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2004 and 2003......................
Page
52
53
Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002....................................................................................
54
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity for the
Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 .......................................
55
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 ............................................................
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements .......................................................
56
58
51
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Prosperity Bancshares, Inc.
Houston, Texas
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Prosperity Bancshares Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related statements of income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2004. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Prosperity Bancshares, Inc.
and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years
in the period ended December 31, 2004, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United State of America.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on the criteria established in
Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our
report dated March 8, 2005, expressed an unqualified opinion on management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting and an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting.
Houston, Texas
March 8, 2005
52
PROSPERITY BANCSHARES, INC.
®
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31,
2004
2003
(Dollars in thousands)
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks.......................................................
Federal funds sold..................................................................
Total cash and cash equivalents.......................................
Interest bearing deposits in financial institutions...................
Available for sale securities, at fair value .............................
Held to maturity securities, at cost........................................
Loans. ....................................................................................
Less allowance for credit losses.............................................
Loans, net ......................................................
Accrued interest receivable....................................................
Goodwill...............................................................................
Core deposit intangibles, net of accumulated amortization
of $2.8 million and $1.0 million, respectively .................
Bank premises and equipment, net .......................................
Other real estate owned ........................................................
Other assets............................................................................
TOTAL ASSETS...................................................................
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
LIABILITIES:
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing ...................................................
Interest-bearing..........................................................
Total deposits ................................................
Other borrowings..............................................................
Securities sold under repurchase agreements....................
Accrued interest payable...................................................
Other liabilities .................................................................
Junior subordinated debentures.........................................
Total liabilities...............................................
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY:
Preferred stock, $1 par value; 20,000,000 shares
$
58,760
79,150
137,910
200
177,683
1,125,109
1,035,513
(13,105 )
1,022,408
10,171
153,180
11,492
35,793
341
22,941
$2,697,228
$ 518,358
1,798,718
2,317,076
13,116
25,058
3,102
15,805
47,424
2,421,581
$ 71,983
11,730
83,713
262
263,648
1,113,232
770,053
(10,345 )
759,708
10,119
118,012
6,743
34,299
246
10,505
$2,400,487
$ 467,389
1,616,359
2,083,748
11,929
19,007
2,522
3,889
59,804
2,180,899
authorized; none issued or outstanding.....................
--
--
Common stock, $1 par value; 50,000,000 shares
authorized; 22,418,128 and 20,966,706
shares issued at December 31, 2004 and
2003, respectively; 22,381,040 and
20,929,618 shares outstanding at
December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively ...............
Capital surplus ..................................................................
Retained earnings..............................................................
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income -- net
unrealized (loss)gain on available for sale
securities, net of tax benefit of $1,669 and tax
of $1,090, respectively
Less treasury stock, at cost, 37,088 shares.......................
Total shareholders' equity..............................
22,418
134,288
122,647
(3,099 )
(607 )
275,647
20,967
102,594
94,610
2,024
(607 )
219,588
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’
EQUITY. ...................................................................
$2,697,228
$2,400,487
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
53
PROSPERITY BANCSHARES, INC.
®
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
For the Years Ended
December 31,
2004
2003
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
2002
$ 55,779
$ 46,686
$ 38,330
52,771
1,461
1,009
556
180
111,756
40,507
1,625
1,779
232
16
90,845
39,289
1,599
1,216
285
23
80,742
24,976
2,170
955
28,101
52,641
1,010
51,631
9,764
--
1,830
11,594
16,379
3,439
2,131
192
1,830
8,378
32,349
30,876
9,555
24,586
4,046
1,157
29,789
81,967
880
81,087
20,215
78
2,778
23,071
27,861
4,814
2,036
1,781
2,843
12,372
51,707
22,633
2,630
1,083
26,346
64,499
483
64,016
14,236
--
2,730
16,966
22,422
4,492
2,128
818
2,535
9,626
42,021
38,961
12,413
INTEREST INCOME:
Loans, including fees........................................
Securities:
Taxable. ......................................................
Nontaxable .................................................
70% nontaxable preferred dividends ..........
Federal funds sold.............................................
Deposits in financial institutions.......................
Total interest income. .............................
INTEREST EXPENSE:
Deposits. ...........................................................
Junior subordinated debentures ........................
Note payable and other borrowings ..................
Total interest expense .............................
NET INTEREST INCOME..................................
PROVISION FOR CREDIT LOSSES.............. ...
NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION
FOR CREDIT LOSSES....................................
NONINTEREST INCOME:
Service charges on deposit accounts.................
Gain on sale of securities..................................
Other.................................................................
Total noninterest income ........................
NONINTEREST EXPENSE:
Salaries and employee benefits.........................
Net occupancy expense ....................................
Data processing ................................................
Core deposit intangibles amortization ..............
Depreciation expense........................................
Other.................................................................
Total noninterest expense. ......................
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES................
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES..................
52,451
17,744
NET INCOME......................................................
$ 34,707
$ 26,548
$ 21,321
EARNINGS PER SHARE:
Basic .................................................................
Diluted..............................................................
$
$
1.61
1.59
$
$
1.38
1.36
$
$
1.25
1.22
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
54
PROSPERITY BANCSHARES, INC.
®
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Common Stock
Shares
Amount
Capital
Surplus
Other
Retained Comprehensive Treasury
Earnings
Income (loss) Stock
Total
Shareholders’
Equity
(Dollars in thousands, except share data)
Accumulated
88,725
21,321
2,427
23,748
260
45,875
(3 )
(3,866 )
154,739
26,548
(620 )
25,928
995
BALANCE AT JANUARY 1, 2002.................
Net income ...............................................
Net change in unrealized gain (loss)
on available for sale securities...............
Total comprehensive income....................
Sale of common stock in connection
16,218,022 $ 16,218 $ 16,865 $ 55,462
21,321
$
217
$
(37 ) $
2,427
with the exercise of stock options .........
104,504
105
155
Common stock issued in connection with
Paradigm acquisition .............................
2,580,502
2,580
43,295
Cash paid in lieu of fractional shares in
connection with the Paradigm
acquisition..............................................
Cash dividends declared, $0.22
per share ...............................................
(3)
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2002............ 18,903,028
18,903
60,312
Net income ...............................................
Net change in unrealized (loss) gain
on available for sale securities...............
Total comprehensive income....................
Sale of common stock in connection with
the exercise of stock options..................
170,638
171
824
Refund of escrow shares in connection
with the Paradigm acquisition ...............
Common stock issued in connection with
the Mainbancorp acquisition .................
1,499,966
1,500
33,149
Common stock issued in connection with
the FSBNT acquisition ..........................
Stock option compensation........................
Junior subordinated debentures issuance
costs ......................................................
Cash dividends declared, $0.25
per share ...............................................
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2003............
Net income ...............................................
Net change in unrealized (loss) gain
on available for sale securities...............
Total comprehensive income....................
Sale of common stock in connection with
393,074
393
8,538
25
(254 )
20,966,706
20,967
102,594
the exercise of stock options .................
206,321
206
840
Common stock issued in connection with
the Liberty acquisition...........................
Stock option compensation........................
Cash dividends declared, $0.31
1,245,191
1,245
30,713
141
(3,866 )
72,917
26,548
2,644
(37 )
(620 )
(570 )
(570 )
(4,855 )
94,610
34,707
2,024
(607 )
(5,123 )
34,649
8,931
25
(254 )
(4,855 )
219,588
34,707
(5,123 )
29,584
1,046
31,958
141
per share ...............................................
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2004............
(6,670 )
22,418,218 $ 22,418 $ 134,288 $ 122,647
$
(3,099 )
$
(6,670 )
(607 ) $ 275,647
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
55
PROSPERITY BANCSHARES, INC.
®
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income........................................................
Adjustments to reconcile net income
to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization......................
Provision for credit losses.............................
Net amortization of premium on
investments ...............................................
Gain on sale of premises,
equipment and other real estate.................
(Increase) decrease in accrued interest
receivable and other assets........................
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest
payable and other liabilities .....................
Total adjustments......................................
Net cash provided by operating activities .
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from maturities and
principal paydowns of held to
maturity securities.........................................
Purchase of held to maturity securities .............
Proceeds from maturities and
principal paydowns of available
for sale securities... .......................................
Proceeds from the sales of available for
sale securities................................................
Purchase of available for sale securities ...........
Net (increase) decrease in loans........................
Purchase of bank premises and equipment .......
Proceeds from sale of bank premises, equipment
and other real estate .....................................
Premium paid for Liberty Bancshares, Inc .......
Net liabilities acquired in the purchase of
Liberty Bancshares, Inc. (net of acquired
cash of $46,599) ...........................................
Premium paid for Village Bank and Trust ........
Net liabilities acquired in the purchase of
Village Bank and Trust (net of acquired cash
of $16,120) ...................................................
Premiums paid for Abrams Centre Bancshares,
Dallas Bancshares, MainBancorp and
FSBNT..........................................................
Net liabilities acquired in purchase of Abrams .
Centre Bancshares, Dallas Bancshares,
MainBancorp and FSBNT (net of acquired
cash of $115,918) .......................................
Premium paid for Texas Guaranty Bank,
The First State Bank, Paradigm Bancorporation,
First National Bank of Bay City and Southwest
Holding Company.........................................
Net liabilities acquired in purchase of Texas
Guaranty Bank, The First State Bank, Paradigm
Bancorporation, First National Bank of Bay
City and Southwest Holding Company (net of
acquired cash of $52,206 .............................
2004
For the Years Ended
December 31,
2003
(Dollars in thousands)
2002
$
34,707
$
26,548
$
21,321
5,122
880
4,869
(389 )
(5,550 )
6,729
11,661
46,368
3,353
483
9,707
2,022
1,010
4,317
(378 )
(39 )
3,663
7
(3,857 )
12,971
39,519
(2,520 )
4,797
26,118
257,501
(270,855 )
505,733
(973,480 )
211,467
(300,816 )
67,201
144,821
128,906
20,000
(299 )
(68,254 )
(895 )
2,522
(27,601 )
36,844
(12,181 )
8,606
--
(11,949 )
37,769
(3,485 )
3,243
--
--
--
--
--
(53,856 )
--
124,840
--
(119,527 )
37,291
(2,171 )
1,229
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
(49,769 )
(Table continued on following page)
--
--
59,158
56
PROSPERITY BANCSHARES, INC.
®
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Net decrease in interest-bearing deposits
in financial institutions..................................
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net (decrease) increase in noninterest-bearing
deposits. ........................................................
Net (decrease) increase in interest-bearing
deposits........................................................
Proceeds (repayments) of other borrowings and
securities sold under repurchase
agreements (net). ..........................................
Proceeds from issuance of junior
subordinated debentures ...............................
Junior subordinated debentures issuance costs .
Cash paid in lieu of fractional shares ................
Redemption of junior subordinated debentures
issued to Prosperity Capital Trust I (net) ......
Proceeds from stock option exercises ...............
Stock option compensation expense .................
Stock issued in connection with the Liberty
acquisition.....................................................
Stock issued in connection with the MainBancorp
and FSBNT acquisitions ...............................
Payments of cash dividends..............................
Net cash (used in) provided by
financing activities ..............................
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH
EQUIVALENTS ..............................................
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING
OF PERIOD......................................................
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF
PERIOD............................................................
INCOME TAXES PAID ......................................
INTEREST PAID.................................................
TRANSFER OF AVAILABLE FOR SALE
SECURITIES TO HELD TO MATURITY
SECURITIES ...................................................
For the Years Ended
December 31,
2004
2003
2002
(Dollars in thousands)
762
13,351
399
(225,967 )
397
(33,835 )
$
(9,892 )
$
23,579
$
10,118
(14,727 )
125,657
26,228
4,622
(24,340)
14,059
--
--
--
(12,000 )
1,046
141
31,958
--
(6,670 )
25,000
(254)
--
--
--
(3)
--
995
--
--
43,580
(4,855 )
--
260
--
--
--
(3,866 )
(5,522 )
189,362
46,796
$
54,197
$
2,914
$
39,079
83,713
80,799
41,720
$
$
$
$
137,910
19,464
29,368
--
$
$
$
$
83,713
14,397
26,215
$
$
$
80,799
9,182
26,250
--
$
241,756
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
57
®
AND SUBSIDIARIES
PROSPERITY BANCSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING POLICIES
Nature of Operations -- Prosperity Bancshares, Inc.® (“Bancshares”) and its subsidiaries, Prosperity Holdings of Delaware,
LLC (“Holdings”) and Prosperity Bank® (the “Bank”, and together with Bancshares and Holdings, collectively referred to as the
“Company”) provide retail and commercial banking services.
The Bank operates fifty-eight (58) full-service banking locations; with twenty-nine (29) in the Greater Houston Consolidated
Metropolitan Statistical Area (“CMSA”), eleven (11) in eight contiguous counties situated south and southwest of Houston and
extending into South Texas, eleven (11) in the Dallas/Fort Worth area and seven (7) in the Austin, Texas area with locations in Dallas-
Abrams Centre, Houston-Aldine, Austin-Allandale, Angleton, Bay City, Beeville, Blooming Grove, Houston-Bellaire, Dallas-Camp
Wisdom, Dallas-Cedar Hill, Houston-City West, Houston-Clear Lake, Cleveland, Austin-Congress, Corsicana, Houston-Copperfield,
Cuero, Cypress, Dayton, Houston-Downtown, East Bernard, Edna, El Campo, Ennis, Fairfield, Galveston, Houston-Gladebrook,
Goliad, Houston-Highway 6, Hitchcock, Dallas-Kiest, Austin-Lakeway, Liberty, Magnolia, Mathis, Houston-Medical Center,
Houston-Memorial, Mont Belvieu, Needville, Palacios, Oakhill, Houston-Post Oak, Dallas-Preston Road, Dallas-Red Oak, Austin-
Research Boulevard, Houston-River Oaks, Austin-Riverside, Sweeny, Houston-Tanglewood, Dallas-Turtle Creek, Victoria, Houston-
Waugh Drive, West Columbia, Dallas-Westmoreland, Wharton, Austin-William Cannon, Winnie and Houston-Woodcreek.
.
Principles of Consolidation -- The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Bancshares and its wholly
owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The accounting and reporting
policies of the Company conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and the
prevailing practices within the banking industry. A summary of significant accounting and reporting policies is as follows:
Use of Estimates -- The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at
the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results
could differ from these estimates.
Securities -- Securities held to maturity are carried at cost, adjusted for the amortization of premiums and the accretion of
discounts. Management has the positive intent and the Company has the ability to hold these assets as long-term securities until their
estimated maturities.
Securities available for sale are carried at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses are excluded from earnings and reported, net
of tax, as a separate component of shareholders' equity until realized. Securities within the available for sale portfolio may be used as
part of the Company's asset/liability strategy and may be sold in response to changes in interest risk, prepayment risk or other similar
economic factors.
Declines in the fair value of individual held to maturity and available for sale securities below their cost that are other than
temporary would result in write-downs of the individual securities to their fair value. The related write-downs would be included in
earnings as realized losses.
Premiums and discounts are amortized and accreted to operations using the level-yield method of accounting, adjusted for
prepayments as applicable. The specific identification method of accounting is used to compute gains or losses on the sales of these
assets. Interest earned on these assets is included in interest income.
Loans -- Loans are stated at the principal amount outstanding, net of unearned discount and fees. Unearned discount relates
principally to consumer installment loans. The related interest income for multipayment loans is recognized principally by the “sum of
the digits” method which records interest in proportion to the declining outstanding balances of the loans; for single payment loans,
such income is recognized using the straight-line method.
Nonrefundable Fees and Costs Associated with Lending Activities - Loan origination fees in excess of the associated
costs are recognized over the life of the related loan as an adjustment to yield using the interest method.
Generally, loan commitment fees are deferred, except for certain retrospectively determined fees, and recognized as an
adjustment of yield by the interest method over the related loan life or, if the commitment expires unexercised, recognized in income
upon expiration of the commitment.
58
PROSPERITY BANCSHARES, INC.
®
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
Nonperforming and Past Due Loans -- Included in the nonperforming loan category are loans which have been categorized
by management as nonaccrual because collection of interest is doubtful and loans which have been restructured to provide a reduction
in the interest rate or a deferral of interest or principal payments. When the payment of principal or interest on a loan is delinquent for
90 days, or earlier in some cases, the loan is placed on nonaccrual status unless the loan is in the process of collection and the
underlying collateral fully supports the carrying value of the loan. If the decision is made to continue accruing interest on the loan,
periodic reviews are made to confirm the accruing status of the loan. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, interest accrued
during the current year prior to the judgment of uncollectibility is charged to operations. Interest accrued during prior periods is
charged to allowance for credit losses. Generally, any payments received on nonaccrual loans are applied first to outstanding loan
amounts and next to the recovery of charged-off loan amounts. Any excess is treated as recovery of lost interest.
Restructured loans are those loans on which concessions in terms have been granted because of a borrower's financial
difficulty. Interest is generally accrued on such loans in accordance with the new terms.
Allowance for Credit Losses -- The allowance for credit losses is a valuation allowance available for losses incurred on
loans. All losses are charged to the allowance when the loss actually occurs or when a determination is made that such a loss is
probable. Recoveries are credited to the allowance at the time of recovery.
Throughout the year, management estimates the probable level of losses to determine whether the allowance for credit losses
is adequate to absorb losses in the existing portfolio. Based on these estimates, an amount is charged to the provision for credit losses
and credited to the allowance for credit losses in order to adjust the allowance to a level determined to be adequate to absorb losses.
Management's judgment as to the level of losses on existing loans involves the consideration of current and anticipated
economic conditions and their potential effects on specific borrowers; an evaluation of the existing relationships among loans,
probable credit losses and the present level of the allowance; results of examinations of the loan portfolio by regulatory agencies; and
management's internal review of the loan portfolio. In determining the collectibility of certain loans, management also considers the
fair value of any underlying collateral. The amounts ultimately realized may differ from the carrying value of these assets because of
economic, operating or other conditions beyond the Company's control.
Estimates of credit losses involve an exercise of judgment. While it is possible that in the short term the Company may
sustain losses which are substantial in relation to the allowance for credit losses, it is the judgment of management that the allowance
for credit losses reflected in the consolidated balance sheets is adequate to absorb probable losses that exist in the current loan
portfolio.
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan, as
amended by SFAS No. 118, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan - Income Recognition and Disclosure applies to all
impaired loans, with the exception of groups of smaller-balance homogeneous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment. A
loan is defined as impaired by SFAS No. 114 if, based on current information and events, it is probable that a creditor will be unable
to collect all amounts due, both interest and principal, according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Specifically, SFAS
No. 114 requires that the allowance for credit losses related to impaired loans be determined based on the difference of carrying value
of loans and the present value of expected cash flows discounted at the loan's effective interest rate or, as a practical expedient, the
loan's observable market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. At December 31, 2004, the
Company had $297,000 in nonaccrual loans, $1.1 million in 90 days or more past due loans, and no restructured loans. At December
31, 2003, the Company had $2,000 in nonaccrual loans, $679,000 in 90 days or more past due loans and no restructured loans.
Interest revenue received on impaired loans is either applied against principal or realized as interest revenue, according to
management's judgment as to the collectibility of principal.
Premises and Equipment -- Premises and equipment are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation expense
is computed principally using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets which range from three to 30 years.
59
PROSPERITY BANCSHARES, INC.
®
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
Goodwill -- Goodwill and intangible assets determined to have an indefinite useful life acquired in a purchase business
combination completed after June 30, 2001 are no longer amortized. Goodwill was amortized using the straight-line method through
December 31, 2001. Goodwill is annually assessed for impairment or when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. The Company bases its evaluation on such impairment factors as the nature of
the assets, the future economic benefit of the assets, any historical or future profitability measurements, as well as other external
market conditions or factors that may be present.
Amortization of Core Deposit Intangibles (CDI) – CDI is amortized using an accelerated amortization method over an
eight year period.
Income Taxes -- Bancshares files a consolidated federal income tax return. The Bank computes federal income taxes as if it
filed a separate return and remits to, or is reimbursed by, Bancshares based on the portion of taxes currently due or refundable.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated tax consequences attributable to differences between the
financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases.
Stock-Based Compensation – As of December 31, 2004, the Company had two stock-based employee compensation plans.
Prior to 2003, the Company accounted for those plans under the recognition and measurement provisions of APB Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related Interpretations. No stock-based employee compensation cost was reflected in
previously reported results, as all options granted under those plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying
common stock on the date of grant. In December 2002, the FASB issued Statement No. 148 (SFAS 148). Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation – Transition and Disclosure, an amendment to FASB Statement 123. SFAS 148 provides alternative methods of
transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. SFAS 148
was effective for financial statements for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002. Effective January 1, 2003, the Company
adopted the fair value recognition provisions of FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, as provided by
SFAS No. 148 for stock-based employee compensation (see Note 14).
For 2002, the Company did not recognize any stock based compensation expense in reported net income. If compensation
expense had been recorded based on the fair value at the grant date for awards consistent with SFAS No. 123, the Company’s net
income and earnings per share would have been as follows for the year ended December 31, 2002:
Year Ended December 31,
2002
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Net income as reported... ..................................................
Deduct: Total stock based employee compensation
expense determined under fair value based method
for all awards, net of related tax effects .................
Proforma net income......................................................
Earnings per share:
Basic-as reported ...................................................
Basic-proforma......................................................
Diluted-as reported ................................................
Diluted-proforma...................................................
$ 21,321
(180)
$ 21,141
$
$
$
$
1.25
1.24
1.22
1.21
Cash and Cash Equivalents -- For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash and due from
banks as well as federal funds sold that mature in three days or less.
Reclassifications -- Certain reclassifications have been made to 2003 and 2002 balances to conform to the current year
presentation. All reclassifications have been applied consistently for the periods presented.
60
PROSPERITY BANCSHARES, INC.
®
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
Earnings Per Share -- SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share, requires presentation of basic and diluted earnings per share.
Basic earnings per share has been computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding for the reporting period. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could
occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock. Net income per common
share for all periods presented has been calculated in accordance with SFAS No. 128. Outstanding stock options issued by the
Company represent the only dilutive effect reflected in diluted weighted average shares.
The following table illustrates the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:
2004
December 31,
2003
Per
Share
Amount
Amount
Per
Share
Amount Amount Amount Amount
2002
Per
Share
Net income ..........................................
Basic:
Weighted average shares
outstanding...............................
Diluted:
Weighted average shares
outstanding.................................
Effect of dilutive securities --
options........................................
(In thousands, except per share data)
$ 34,707
$ 26,548
$ 21,321
21,534
$ 1.61
19,225
$ 1.38
17,122
$ 1.25
21,534
270
19,225
311
17,122
320
Total................................................
21,804
$ 1.59
19,536
$ 1.36
17,442
$ 1.22
There were no stock options exercisable at December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 that would have had an anti-dilutive effect on
the above computation.
New Accounting Standards --
Statements of Financial Accounting Standards
SFAS No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity.” SFAS
150 establishes standards for how an issuer classifies, measures and discloses in its financial statements certain financial instruments
with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. SFAS 150 requires that an issuer classify financial instruments that are within its
scope as liabilities, in most circumstances. Such financial instruments include (i) financial instruments that are issued in the form of
shares that are mandatorily redeemable; (ii) financial instruments that embody an obligation to repurchase the issuer’s equity shares,
or are indexed to such an obligation, and that require the issuer to settle the obligation by transferring assets; (iii) financial instruments
that embody an obligation that the issuer may settle by issuing a variable number of its equity shares if, at inception, the monetary
value of the obligation is predominantly based on a fixed amount, variations in something other than the fair value of the issuer’s
equity shares or variations inversely related to changes in the fair value of the issuer’s equity shares; and (iv) certain freestanding
financial instruments. The Company adopted SFAS 150 on January 1, 2004 and its adoption did not have a material impact on the
Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
SFAS No. 123, “Share-Based Payment (Revised 2004).” SFAS 123R establishes standards for the accounting for transactions
in which an entity (i) exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services, or (ii) incurs liabilities in exchange for goods or services
that are based on the fair value of the entity’s equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of the equity instruments.
SFAS 123R eliminates the ability to account for stock-based compensation using APB 25 and requires that such transactions be
recognized as compensation cost in the income statement based on their fair values on the date of the grant. SFAS 123R is mandatory
for all entities on July 1, 2005.
61
PROSPERITY BANCSHARES, INC.
®
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretations
In December 2003, the FASB issued FIN 46R, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.” FIN 46R provides guidance on
how to identify a variable interest entity and determine when the assets, liabilities, non-controlling interests and results of operations
of a variable interest entity need to be included in a company’s consolidated financial statements. A company that holds variable
interest in an entity is required to consolidate the entity if the company’s interest in the variable interest entity is such that the
company will absorb a majority of the variable interest entity’s expected losses and/or receive a majority of the entity’s expected
residual returns, if they occur. As of December 31, 2004, the Company had no investments in variable interest entities requiring
consolidation. FIN 46R requires that Prosperity Capital Trust II, Prosperity Statutory Trust III, Prosperity Statutory Trust IV and
Paradigm Capital Trust II be deconsolidated from the consolidated financial statements. The Company adopted FIN 46R on January 1,
2004. After adoption, the trust preferred securities issued by each of the foregoing trusts are no longer shown in the consolidated
financial statements. Instead, the junior subordinated debentures issued by the Company to each of these trusts are shown as liabilities
in the consolidated balance sheets and interest expense associated with such junior subordinated debentures is shown in the
consolidated statements of income.
Emerging Issues Task Force
In May 2004, the EITF reached a consensus on Issue 03-03 (EITF 03-03) “Applicability of EITF Abstracts, Topic No. D-79,
‘Accounting for Retroactive Insurance Contracts Purchased by Entities Other Than Insurance Enterprises,’ to Claims-Made
Insurance Policies”. This EITF clarifies that a claims-made insurance policy that provides coverage for specific known claims prior to
the policy period contains a retroactive provision that should be accounted for accordingly; either separately, if practicable, or, if not
practicable, the claims-made insurance policy should be accounted for entirely as a retroactive contract. The Company adopted the
provisions of EITF No. 03-03 on January 1, 2004. The adoption of EITF 03-03 did not have a material impact on the Company’s
consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In March 2004, the EITF reached consensus on Issue 03-01 (EITF 03-01), “The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary
Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments.” EITF 03-01 includes new guidance for evaluating and recording impairment
losses on debt and equity investments, as well as new disclosure requirements for investments that are deemed to be temporarily
impaired. This Issue specifically addresses whether an investor has the ability and intent to hold an investment until recovery. In
addition, Issue 03-01 contains disclosure requirements that provide useful information about impairments that have not been
recognized as other-than-temporary for investments with in the scope of this Issue. On September 30, 2004, the Financial Accounting
Standards Board deferred the effective date of the Issue’s guidance on how to evaluate and recognize an impairment loss that is other-
than-temporary. This Issue’s guidance is pending the issuance of a final FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) relating to the draft FSP EITF
Issue 03-01-a, Implementation Guidance for the Application of Paragraph 16 of EITF Issue No. 03-01, “The Meaning of Other-Than-
Temporary Impairment and its Application to Certain Investments,” which the Board may issue as early as November. This deferral
did not change the disclosure guidance which remains effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2003. Matters being
considered by the FASB which may impact the Company’s financial reporting include the accounting as a component in determining
net income for declines in market value of debt securities which are due solely to changes in market interest rates and the effect of
sales of available-for-sale securities which have market values below cost at the time of sale and whether such sale indicates an
absence of intent and ability of the investor to hold to a forecasted recovery of the investment’s value to its original cost.
SEC Staff Accounting Bulletins
SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 105, “Application of Accounting Principles to Loan Commitments.” SAB 105
summarizes the views of the staff of the SEC regarding the application of generally accepted accounting principles to loan
commitments accounted for as derivative instruments. SAB 105 provides that the fair value of recorded loan commitments that are
accounted for as derivatives under SFAS 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” should not
incorporate the expected future cash flows related to the associated servicing of the future loan. In addition, SAB 105 requires
registrants to disclose their accounting policy for loan commitments. The provisions of SAB 105 must be applied to loan commitments
accounted for as derivatives that are entered into after March 31, 2004. The adoption of this accounting standard did not have a
material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
62
PROSPERITY BANCSHARES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
®
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
American Institute of Certified Public Accounting Statements of Position
SOP No. 03-3, “Accounting for Certain Loans or Debt Securities Acquired in a Transfer.” SOP 03-3 addresses accounting
for differences between the contractual cash flows of certain loans and debt securities and the cash flows expected to be collected
when loans or debt securities are acquired in a transfer and those cash flow differences are attributable, at least in part, to credit
quality. As such, SOP 03-3 applies to loans and debt securities acquired individually, in pools or as part of a business combination and
does not apply to originated loans. The application of SOP 03-3 limits the interest income, including accretion of purchase price
discounts, that may be recognized for certain loans and debt securities. Additionally, SOP 03-3 does not allow the excess of
contractual cash flows over cash flows expected to be collected to be recognized as an adjustment of yield, loss accrual or valuation
allowance, such as the allowance for possible loan losses. SOP 03-3 requires that increases in expected cash flows subsequent to the
initial investment be recognized prospectively through adjustment of the yield on the loan or debt security over its remaining life.
Decreases in expected cash flows should be recognized as impairment. In the case of loans acquired in a business combination where
the loans show signs of credit deterioration, SOP 03-3 represents a significant change from current purchase accounting practice
whereby the acquiree’s allowance for loan losses is typically added to the acquirer’s allowance for loan losses. SOP 03-3 is effective
for loans and debt securities acquired by the Company beginning January 1, 2005. Management is currently evaluating the impact the
adoption of SOP 03-3 will have on its financial statements.
Stock Split -- On May 31, 2002, the Company effected a two-for-one stock split in the form of a 100 percent stock dividend
to shareholders of record on May 20, 2002. The Company issued approximately 8.1 million shares in connection with the split. All
per share and share information has been restated to reflect this stock split.
2. ACQUISITIONS
On August 1, 2004, the Company completed its acquisition of Village Bank and Trust, s.s.b. (“Village”), Austin, Texas.
Under the terms of the agreement, the Company paid approximately $19.1 million in cash for all of the issued and outstanding capital
stock of Village. Village was privately held and operated one (1) banking office in the Lakeway area of Austin, Texas. As of June 30,
2004, Village had total assets of $110.9 million, loans of $79.7 million, deposits of $97.3 million and shareholders’ equity of $10.4
million.
In connection with the purchase, the Company paid a cash premium of $12.2 million, of which $331,000 was identified as
core deposit intangibles. The remaining $11.8 million of the premium was recorded as goodwill. The core deposit intangibles are
being amortized using an accelerated amortization method over an 8 year life.
The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. Accordingly, the assets and liabilities of the
acquired branch were recorded at their fair values at the acquisition date.
On August 1, 2004, the Company completed its acquisition of Liberty Bancshares, Inc. (“Liberty”), Austin, Texas, pursuant
to which Liberty merged into the Company and its wholly owned subsidiary, Liberty Bank, S.S.B., merged into the Bank. Under the
terms of the agreement, the Company paid approximately $8.9 million in cash and issued approximately 1.3 million shares of its
Common Stock for all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Liberty and Liberty Bank and all outstanding stock options of
Liberty Bank. Liberty was privately held and operated six (6) banking offices in Austin, Texas. As of June 30, 2004, Liberty had, on
a consolidated basis, total assets of $178.7 million, loans of $120.3 million, deposits of $158.9 million and shareholders’ equity of
$16.5 million.
In connection with the purchase, the Company paid a cash premium of $27.6 million of which $3.8 million was identified as
core deposit intangibles. The remaining $23.8 million of the premium was recorded as goodwill. The core deposit intangibles are
being amortized using an accelerated amortization method over an 8 year life.
The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. Accordingly, the assets and liabilities of the
acquired branches were recorded at their fair values at the acquisition date.
On December 9, 2003, the Company completed the merger of First State Bank of North Texas, Dallas, Texas (“FSBNT”)
into the Bank. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company paid approximately $12.6 million in cash and issued approximately
393,074 shares of its common stock for all outstanding shares of First State. First State was privately held and operated four (4)
63
PROSPERITY BANCSHARES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
®
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
banking offices in Dallas, Texas. One banking center was closed and consolidated with an existing banking center located nearby. As
of September 30, 2003, First State had total assets of $100.7 million, loans of $20.1 million, deposits of $91.4 million and
shareholders’ equity of $8.8 million.
In connection with the purchase, the Company paid a cash premium of $13.9 million of which $1.9 million was identified as
core deposit intangibles. The remaining $12.0 million of the premium was recorded as goodwill. The core deposit intangibles are
being amortized using an accelerated amortization method over an 8 year life.
The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. Accordingly, the assets and liabilities of the
acquired branches were recorded at their fair values at the acquisition date.
On November 1, 2003, the Company completed the merger of MainBancorp, Inc., Dallas Texas ("MainBancorp"), into the
Company. In connection with the transaction, MainBancorp's wholly owned subsidiary, mainbank, n.a., was merged into the Bank.
Under the terms of the agreement, the Company issued approximately 1.5 million shares of its Common Stock and paid approximately
$9.1 million in cash for all outstanding shares of MainBancorp stock. In addition, the Company assumed options to acquire 100,851
shares of its Common Stock. MainBancorp was privately held and operated four (4) banking offices in Dallas, Texas. As of
September 30, 2003, MainBancorp had, on a consolidated basis, total assets of $177.1 million, loans of $90.8 million, deposits of
$153.7 million and shareholders’ equity of $22.6 million.
In connection with the purchase, the Company paid a cash premium of $27.2 million of which $2.7 million was identified as
core deposit intangibles. The remaining $24.5 million of the premium was recorded as goodwill. The core deposit intangibles are
being amortized using an accelerated amortization method over an 8 year life.
The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. Accordingly, the assets and liabilities of the
acquired branches were recorded at their fair values at the acquisition date.
On June 1, 2003, the Company completed the merger of Dallas Bancshares, Dallas, Texas (“Dallas Bancshares”), into the
Company. In connection with the transaction, Dallas Bancshares’ wholly owned subsidiary, BankDallas, was merged into the Bank.
Under the terms of the agreement, the Company paid approximately $7.0 million in cash. Dallas Bancshares operated one (1) banking
office in Dallas, Texas. As of March 31, 2003, Dallas Bancshares had on a consolidated basis, total assets of $42.0 million, loans of
28.3 million, deposits of $37.6 million and shareholders’ equity of $4.3 million.
In connection with the purchase, the Company paid a cash premium of $3.0 million of which $45,000 was identified as core
deposit intangibles. The remaining $2.5 million of the premium was recorded as goodwill. The core deposit intangibles are being
amortized using an accelerated amortization method over an 8 year life.
The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. Accordingly, the assets and liabilities of the
acquired branches were recorded at their fair values at the acquisition date.
On May 6, 2003, the Company completed the merger of Abrams Centre Bancshares, Dallas, Texas (“Abrams”), into the
Company. In connection with the acquisition, Abrams’ wholly owned subsidiary, Abrams Centre National Bank, was merged into the
Bank. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company paid approximately $16.3 million in cash. Abrams operated two (2) banking
offices in Dallas, Texas. One banking center was closed and consolidated with an existing banking center located nearby. As of
March 31, 2003, Abrams, on a consolidated basis, had total assets of $96.5 million, loans of $31.7 million, deposits of $70.8 million
and shareholders’ equity of $14.0 million.
In connection with the purchase, the Company paid a cash premium of $6.7 million of which $430,000 was identified as core
deposit intangibles. The remaining $6.3 million of the premium was recorded as goodwill. The core deposit intangibles are being
amortized using an accelerated amortization method over an 8 year life.
The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. Accordingly, the assets and liabilities of the
acquired branches were recorded at their fair values at the acquisition date.
64
PROSPERITY BANCSHARES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
®
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
On November 1, 2002, the Company completed the acquisition of First National Bank of Bay City, Bay City, Texas
("FNB"), through the merger of FNB with and into the Bank. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company paid approximately
$5.1 million in cash for all of the issued and outstanding common stock of FNB. FNB operated one (1) location in Bay City, Texas,
which was closed and consolidated with the Bank’s Bay City Banking Center. As of November 1, 2002, FNB had total assets of $27.1
million, total loans of $8.2 million and total deposits of $23.8 million.
In connection with the purchase, the Company paid a cash premium of $2.2 million of which $168,000 was identified as core
deposit intangibles. The remaining $2.0 million of the premium was recorded as goodwill. The core deposit intangibles are being
amortized using an accelerated amortization method over an 8 year life.
The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. Accordingly, the assets and liabilities of the
acquired branches were recorded at their fair values at the acquisition date.
On October 1, 2002, the Company completed the acquisition of Southwest Bank Holding Company, Dallas, Texas
(“Southwest”). Southwest’s wholly owned subsidiary, Bank of the Southwest, Dallas, Texas, became a subsidiary of the Company.
Under the terms of the agreement, the Company paid approximately $19.6 million in cash. Southwest was privately held and operated
two (2) banking offices in Dallas, Texas. As of October 1, 2002, Southwest had total assets of $121.9 million, total loans of $58.7
million and total deposits of $108.9 million.
In connection with the purchase, the Company paid a cash premium of $5.7 million of which $640,000 was identified as core
deposit intangibles. The remaining $5.0 million of the premium was recorded as goodwill. The core deposit intangibles are being
amortized using an accelerated amortization method over an 8 year life.
The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. Accordingly, the assets and liabilities of the
acquired branches were recorded at their fair values at the acquisition date.
On September 1, 2002, the Company completed the acquisition of Paradigm Bancorporation, Inc. (“Paradigm”) in a stock
transaction. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company issued approximately 2.58 million shares of its common stock for all
outstanding shares of Paradigm (giving effect to the two for one stock split). Paradigm operated a total of eleven (11) banking offices -
six (6) in the greater metropolitan Houston area and five (5) in the nearby Southeast Texas cities of Dayton, Galveston, Mont Belvieu,
and Winnie, three (3) of which were closed following completion of the transaction. As of September 1, 2002, Paradigm had total
assets of $248.7 million, total loans of $175.7 million and total deposits of $218.3 million.
In connection with the purchase, the Company paid a cash premium of $36.6 million of which $2.8 million was identified as
core deposit intangibles. The remaining $33.8 million of the premium was recorded as goodwill. The core deposit intangibles are
being amortized using an accelerated amortization method over an 8 year life.
The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. Accordingly, the assets and liabilities of the
acquired branches were recorded at their fair values at the acquisition date.
On July 12, 2002, the Company completed the acquisition of The First State Bank, Needville, Texas (“First State”) for
approximately $3.7 million in cash. The Bank’s existing Needville Banking Center relocated into the former First State Bank location
effective July 15, 2002. As of July 12, 2002, First State had total assets of $16.3 million, loans of $5.5 million and deposits of $14.1
million.
In connection with the purchase, the Company paid a cash premium of $1.7 million of which $293,000 was identified as core
deposit intangibles. The remaining $1.4 million of the premium was recorded as goodwill. The core deposit intangibles are being
amortized using an accelerated amortization method over an 8 year life.
65
PROSPERITY BANCSHARES, INC.
®
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. Accordingly, the assets and liabilities of the
acquired branches were recorded at their fair values at the acquisition date.
On May 8, 2002, the Company completed the acquisition of Texas Guaranty Bank, N.A. (“Texas Guaranty”) for
approximately $11.8 million in cash. Texas Guaranty operated three (3) offices in Houston, Texas, all of which became full service
banking centers of the Bank. As of May 8, 2002, Texas Guaranty had total assets of $74.0 million, loans of $45.7 million and deposits
of $61.8 million.
In connection with the purchase, the Company paid a cash premium of $3.7 million of which $431,000 was identified as core
deposit intangibles. The remaining $3.3 million of the premium was recorded as goodwill. The core deposit intangibles are being
amortized using an accelerated amortization method over an 8 year life.
The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. Accordingly, the assets and liabilities of the
acquired branches were recorded at their fair values at the acquisition date.
66
PROSPERITY BANCSHARES, INC.
®
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
3. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Changes in the carrying amount of the Company’s goodwill and core deposit intangibles for fiscal 2004 and 2003 were as
follows:
Balance as of December 31, 2002 ..........................................
Less:
Amortization.......................................................................
Add:........................................................................................
Acquisition of Abrams Centre Bancshares.........................
Acquisition of Dallas Bancshares .......................................
Acquisition of MainBancorp ..............................................
Acquisition of FSBNT........................................................
Purchase accounting adjustments to prior year acquisitions:
Acquisition of Texas Guaranty Bank..................................
Acquisition of First State Bank of Needville......................
Acquisition of Paradigm Bancorporation ...........................
Acquisition of First National Bank of Bay City .................
Acquisition of Southwest Bank Holding Company............
Balance as of December 31, 2003 ..........................................
Less:
Amortization.......................................................................
Add:........................................................................................
Acquisition of Liberty Bancshares .....................................
Acquisition of Village Bank and Trust, ssb ........................
Acquisition of MainBancorp ..............................................
Acquisition of FSBNT........................................................
Purchase accounting adjustments to prior year acquisitions
(deferred tax adjustments):
Acquisition of FSBNT........................................................
Acquisition of MainBancorp ..............................................
Acquisition of Texas Guaranty Bank..................................
Acquisition of First State Bank of Needville......................
Acquisition of Paradigm Bancorporation ...........................
Acquisition of Abrams Centre ............................................
Acquisition of Dallas Bancshares .......................................
Acquisition of Southwest Bank Holding Company............
Balance as of December 31, 2004 .................................
Goodwill
Core Deposit Intangibles
(Dollars in thousands)
$
68,290
$
4,121
--
6,707
2,953
27,180
13,884
12
96
(826)
(311)
27
118,012
$
(818 )
430
45
2,657
--
--
--
--
308
--
6,743
--
(1,781 )
23,803
11,851
(203 )
(2,266 )
404
748
(9 )
(6 )
(127 )
153
24
796
153,180
3,797
331
300
2,102
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
11,492
$
$
$
Purchase accounting adjustments to prior year acquisitions were made to adjust deferred tax asset balances. Gross core deposit
intangibles outstanding were $14.3 million at December 31, 2004.
67
®
PROSPERITY BANCSHARES, INC
. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
Core deposit intangibles are amortized on an accelerated basis over their estimated lives which is 8 years. Amortization
expense related to intangible assets totaled $1.8 million in 2004, $818,000 in 2003 and $192,000 in 2002. The estimated aggregate
future amortization expense for intangible assets remaining as of December 31, 2004 is as follows (dollars in thousands):
2005 ................................................ $ 2,106
1,963
2006 ................................................
1,820
2007 ................................................
1,678
2008 ................................................
1,535
2009 ................................................
2,390
Thereafter........................................
Total......................................... $11,492
4. CASH AND DUE FROM BANKS
The Bank is required by the Federal Reserve Bank to maintain average reserve balances. “Cash and due from banks” in the
consolidated balance sheets includes amounts so restricted of $20.9 million and $29.6 million at December 31, 2004 and 2003,
respectively.
5. SECURITIES
The amortized cost and fair value of investment securities are as follows:
Amortized
Cost
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
December 31, 2004
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
(Dollars in thousands)
Fair
Value
Carrying
Value
Available for Sale
U.S. Treasury securities and
obligations of U.S. government
agencies. ...................................................
70% non-taxable preferred stock ..................
States and political subdivisions ...................
Collateralized mortgage obligations .............
Mortgage-backed securities. .........................
Qualified Zone Academy Bond ....................
Equity securities ...........................................
Total .........................................................
Held to Maturity
U.S. Treasury securities and
obligations of U.S. government
agencies. ...................................................
States and political subdivisions ...................
Corporate debt securities ..............................
Collateralized mortgage obligations .............
Mortgage-backed securities ..........................
$
10,579
24,000
14,382
13,143
112,050
8,000
296
$ 182,450
$
20,147
23,317
10,491
225,851
845,303
$
$
$
2
--
1,366
76
545
--
--
1,989
661
510
301
97
3,559
$
$
$
69
6,150
--
35
502
--
--
6,756
6
15
--
802
4,914
$
10,512
17,850
15,748
13,184
112,093
8,000
296
$ 177,683
$
20,802
23,812
10,792
225,146
843,948
Total .........................................................
$1,125,109
$
5,128
$
5,737
$1,124,500
$ 10,512
17,850
15,748
13,184
112,093
8,000
296
$ 177,683
$ 20,147
23,317
10,491
225,851
845,303
$1,125,109
68
®
PROSPERITY BANCSHARES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
Amortized
Cost
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
December 31, 2003
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
(Dollars in thousands)
Fair
Value
Carrying
Value
Available for Sale
U.S. Treasury securities and
obligations of U.S. government
agencies ....................................................
70% non-taxable preferred stock ..................
States and political subdivisions ...................
Collateralized mortgage obligations .............
Mortgage-backed securities ..........................
Qualified Zone Academy Bond ....................
Equity securities ...........................................
Total .........................................................
Held to Maturity
U.S. Treasury securities and
obligations of U.S. government
agencies ....................................................
States and political subdivisions ...................
Corporate debt securities ..............................
Collateralized mortgage obligations .............
Mortgage-backed securities ..........................
$
15,824
44,015
15,141
17,745
159,525
8,000
283
$ 260,533
$
32,938
30,597
15,619
160,742
873,336
$
$
$
$
$
$
247
--
1,798
510
1,179
--
--
3,734
1,591
1,121
743
1,338
7,806
--
327
--
68
224
--
--
619
$
16,071
43,688
16,939
18,187
160,480
8,000
283
$ 263,648
$ 16,071
43,688
16,939
18,187
160,480
8,000
283
$ 263,648
14
--
--
191
3,175
$
34,515
31,718
16,362
161,889
877,967
$ 32,938
30,597
15,619
160,742
873,336
Total .........................................................
$1,113,232
$ 12,599
$
3,380
$1,122,451
$1,113,232
In estimating other-than-temporary impairment losses, management considers, among other things, (i) the length of time and
the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (ii) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (iii) the
intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated
recovery in fair value.
Management has the ability and intent to hold its securities until they mature, at which time the Company will receive full
value for the securities. The unrealized losses are largely due to increases in market interest rates over the yields available at the time
the underlying securities were purchased. The fair value is expected to recover as the bonds approach their maturity date or repricing
date or if market yields for such investments decline. Management does not believe any of the securities are impaired due to reasons
of credit quality. Accordingly, as of December 31, 2004, management believes the impairments detailed in the table above are
temporary and no impairment loss has been realized in the Company’s consolidated statements of income.
69
PROSPERITY BANCSHARES, INC.
®
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
Securities with unrealized losses segregated by length of time such securities have been in a continuous loss position at
December 31, 2004 were as follows:
Available for Sale
U.S. Treasury securities and
obligations of U.S. government
agencies ................................................
70% non-taxable preferred stock ..............
Collateralized mortgage obligations .........
Mortgage backed securities ......................
Total..................................................
Held to Maturity
U.S. Treasury securities and
obligations of U.S. government
agencies ................................................
70% non-taxable preferred stock ..............
Collateralized mortgage obligations .........
Mortgage backed securities ......................
Total..................................................
Less than 12 Months
More than 12 Months
Total
Estimated Unrealized
Fair Value
Losses
Estimated
Fair Value
(Dollars in thousands)
Unrealized
Losses
Estimated Unrealized
Losses
Fair Value
$
9,979
12,250
2,921
44,229
$ 69,379
69
$
4,750
13
277
$ 5,109
$
--
5,600
2,132
17,086
$ 24,818
--
1,400
22
225
$ 1,647
$ 9,979
17,850
5,053
61,315
$ 94,197
69
$
6,150
35
502
$ 6,756
$
998
3,359
190,352
498,584
$ 693,293
$
6
15
802
3,422
$ 4,245
$
--
--
--
74,922
$ 74,922
--
--
--
1,492
$ 1,492
$
998
3,359
190,352
573,506
$768,215
$
6
15
802
4,914
$ 5,737
The amortized cost and fair value of investment securities at December 31, 2004, by contractual maturity, are shown below.
Actual maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations at any time
with or without call or prepayment penalties.
December 31, 2004
Held to Maturity
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
Available for Sale
Fair
Value
Amortized
Cost
(Dollars in thousands)
$
18,315
$
18,560
$
5,407
$ 5,383
30,129
5,511
--
53,955
31,138
5,708
--
55,406
5,918
11,727
34,204
57,256
5,883
12,027
29,113
52,406
Due in one year or less ..............................................
Due after one year through five
years......................................................................
Due after five years through ten
years......................................................................
Due after ten years.....................................................
Subtotal......................................................................
Mortgage-backed securities and
collateralized mortgage
obligations.............................................................
1,071,154
1,069,094
125,194
125,277
Total ......................................................................
$1,125,109
$1,124,500
$ 182,450
$ 177,683
Gross proceeds from the sale of securities classified as available for sale was approximately $20.1 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004 and resulted in a gain of $78,000 for the same period. There were no sales of securities in 2003.
The Company does not own securities of any one issuer (other than the U.S. government and its agencies) for which
aggregate adjusted cost exceeds 10% of the consolidated shareholders' equity at December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003.
70
PROSPERITY BANCSHARES, INC.
®
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
Securities with an amortized cost of $790.2 million and $600.4 million and a fair value of $789.6 million and $605.6 million
at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, were pledged to collateralize public deposits and for other purposes required or
permitted by law.
6. LOANS
The loan portfolio consists of various types of loans made principally to borrowers located in Southeast Texas, Dallas and
Austin and is classified by major type as follows:
Commercial and industrial..........................................
Real estate:
Construction and land
development ....................................................
1-4 family residential .............................................
Home equity ...........................................................
Commercial mortgages ..........................................
Farmland ................................................................
Multi-family residential..........................................
Agriculture ..................................................................
Other ...........................................................................
Consumer ....................................................................
Total ......................................................................
Less unearned discount ...............................................
December 31,
2004
2003
(Dollars in thousands)
$ 144,432
$
93,989
109,591
260,453
34,453
369,151
22,240
18,187
21,906
2,246
52,887
1,035,546
33
36,470
237,055
27,943
260,882
15,247
20,679
20,693
2,274
54,980
770,212
159
Total ......................................................................
$1,035,513
$ 770,053
The contractual maturity ranges of the commercial and industrial and construction and land development portfolios and the
amount of such loans with predetermined interest rates and floating rates in each maturity range are summarized in the following
table:
Commercial and industrial..............................................
Construction and land development ...............................
Total................................................................
Loans with a predetermined interest rate ........................
Loans with a floating interest rate...................................
Total................................................................
One Year
or Less
$72,934
84,235
$157,169
$ 39,873
117,296
$157,169
December 31, 2004
After One
Through
Five Years
After Five
Years
(Dollars in thousands)
$55,947
19,766
$75,713
$ 23,736
51,977
$75,713
$ 15,551
5,590
$21,141
$ 4,351
16,790
$21,141
Total
$ 144,432
109,591
$ 254,023
$ 67,960
186,063
$ 254,023
71
PROSPERITY BANCSHARES, INC.
®
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, loans outstanding to directors, officers and their affiliates totaled $8.1 million and $5.6
million, respectively. In the opinion of management, all transactions entered into between the Company and such related parties have
been, and are, in the ordinary course of business, made on the same terms and conditions as similar transactions with unaffiliated
persons.
An analysis of activity with respect to these related-party loans is as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
2004
2003
(Dollars in thousands)
Beginning balance....................................................
New loans and reclassified related loans .................
Repayments..............................................................
$ 5,589
4,217
(2,460 )
Ending balance.........................................................
$ 7,346
$ 9,804
3,333
(7,548 )
$ 5,589
7. ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES
An analysis of activity in the allowance for credit losses is as follows:
Balance at beginning of year. ...................................................
Balance acquired in the Texas Guaranty, First State,
Paradigm, FNB and Southwest acquisitions.............
Balance acquired in the Abrams, Dallas Bancshares,
Year Ended December 31,
2004
2003
2002
(Dollars in thousands)
$ 10,345
$ 9,580
$ 5,985
--
--
2,981
MainBancorp and FSBNT acquisitions ....................
-- 1,900
Balance acquired in the Liberty and Village
acquisitions ...............................................................
2,365
Addition -- provision charged to
operations ..................................................................
(Charge-offs) and recoveries:
Loans charged off ...............................................
Loan recoveries...................................................
880
(950 )
465
--
483
(2,241 )
623
Net (charge-offs) recoveries ................. .........................
(485 )
(1,618 )
--
--
1,010
(767 )
371
(396 )
Balance at end of year. .............................................................
$ 13,105
$ 10,345
$ 9,580
8. PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT
Premises and equipment are summarized as follows:
Year Ended
December 31,
2004
2003
(Dollars in thousands)
Land ...................................................................................
Buildings............................................................................
Furniture, fixtures and equipment......................................
Construction in progress ....................................................
Total............................................................................
Less accumulated depreciation ..........................................
Premises and equipment, net ......................................
$ 8,636
30,236
10,739
74
49,685
(13,892 )
$ 35,793
$ 7,907
27,823
9,980
106
45,816
(11,517 )
$ 34,299
72
PROSPERITY BANCSHARES, INC.
®
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
9. DEPOSITS
Included in interest-bearing deposits are certificates of deposit in amounts of $100,000 or more. These certificates and their
remaining maturities at December 31, 2004 were as follows:
Three months or less ...........................................................
Greater than three through six months ................................
Greater than six through twelve months .............................
Thereafter............................................................................
Total.............................................................................
December 31, 2004
(Dollars in thousands)
$ 174,012
68,672
73,199
95,407
$ 411,290
Interest expense for certificates of deposit in excess of $100,000 was $8.5 million, $7.4 million and $6.9 million, for the years
ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
The Company has no brokered deposits and there are no major concentrations of deposits with any one depositor.
10. OTHER BORROWINGS
Other Borrowings – The Company utilizes borrowings to supplement deposits to fund its lending and investment activities.
As needed, the Company obtains additional funds from the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) and correspondent banks. At
December 31, 2004, the Company had $13.1 million in FHLB borrowings compared with $11.9 million in FHLB borrowings at
December 31, 2003, all of which consisted of long-term FHLB notes payable. The $1.2 million increase is attributable to the
acquisition of one note from Village Bank and Trust, ssb partially offset by normal pay downs on the remaining notes. The maturity
dates on the FHLB notes payable range from 2004 to 2028 and the interest rates range from 4.64% to 6.48%. FHLB advances are
considered short-term, overnight borrowings. The Company had no FHLB advances outstanding at December 31, 2004 and 2003.
The highest outstanding balance of FHLB advances during 2004 was $50.0 million compared with $59.3 million during 2003. The
Company had no federal funds purchased at December 31, 2004 or 2003.
At December 31, 2004, the Company had $25.1 million in securities sold under repurchase agreements compared with $19.0
million at December 31, 2003, an increase of $6.1 million or 31.8%. The increase is primarily attributable to the Liberty acquisition.
11. INTEREST RATE RISK
The Company is principally engaged in providing real estate, consumer and commercial loans, with interest rates that are
both fixed and variable. These loans are primarily funded through short-term demand deposits and longer-term certificates of deposit
with variable and fixed rates. The fixed real estate loans are more sensitive to interest rate risk because of their fixed rates and longer
maturities.
73
®
PROSPERITY BANCSHARES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
12. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS WITH OFF-BALANCE-SHEET RISK
In the normal course of business, the Company is a party to various financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk to meet
the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit,
which involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the consolidated
balance sheets. The contract or notional amounts of these instruments reflect the extent of the Company's involvement in particular
classes of financial instruments.
The Company's exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for
commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount of these instruments. The
Company uses the same credit policies in making these commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance-sheet
instruments.
The following is a summary of the various financial instruments entered into by the Company:
December 31,
2004
2003
(Dollars in thousands)
Commitments to extend credit ..........................
Standby letters of credit ....................................
$190,845
5,863
$ 83,609
4,069
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition
established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment
of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being fully drawn upon, the total commitment amounts
disclosed above do not necessarily represent future cash funding requirements. At December 31, 2004, $24.6 million of commitments
to extend credit have fixed rates ranging from 2.25% to 18.00%.
Standby letters of credit are written conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a
customer to a third party. In the event the customer does not perform in accordance with the terms of the agreement with the third
party, the Company would be required to fund the commitment. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company
could be required to make is represented by the contractual amount of the commitment. If the commitment is funded, the Company
would be entitled to seek recovery from the customer. The Company’s policies generally require that standby letter of credit
arrangements contain security and debt covenants similar to those contained in loan agreements.
The Company evaluates customer creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if considered
necessary by the Company upon extension of credit, is based on management's credit evaluation of the customer.
13. INCOME TAXES
The components of the provision for federal income taxes are as follows:
2004
Year Ended December 31,
2003
(Dollars in thousands)
2002
Current ................................................................................
Deferred. .............................................................................
$ 16,211
1,533
$ 12,203
210
$ 8,963
592
Total....................................................................................
$ 17,744
$ 12,413
$ 9,555
74
PROSPERITY BANCSHARES, INC.
®
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
The provision for federal income taxes differs from the amount computed by applying the federal income tax statutory rate on
income as follows:
Taxes calculated at statutory rate... ...................................
Increase (decrease) resulting from:
Tax-exempt interest...............................................
Qualified Zone Academy Bond credit...................
Dividends received deduction ...............................
Amortization of CDI and goodwill........................
Other, net...............................................................
Year Ended December 31,
2004
2003
2002
$ 18,358
(Dollars in thousands)
$ 13,636
(612 )
(373 )
(286 )
623
35
(702 )
(373 )
(436 )
--
288
$ 10,807
(690 )
(373)
(298)
61
48
Total...................................................................................
$ 17,744
$ 12,413
$ 9,555
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:
December 31,
2004
(Dollars in thousands)
2003
Deferred tax assets:
Allowance for credit losses ....................................
Nonaccrual loan interest .........................................
Accrued liabilities...................................................
Transfers from acquired banks ...............................
Bank premises and equipment................................
Basis difference in loans.........................................
Unrealized loss on available for sale securities ......
Loss carry forwards ................................................
Credit carry forwards..............................................
Other.......................................................................
Total deferred tax assets......................................................
Deferred tax liabilities:
Accretion on investments .......................................
Bank premises and equipment................................
Goodwill and core deposit intangibles ...................
Securities premium amortization............................
Investments in partnerships ....................................
Prepaid expenses ....................................................
Unrealized gain on available for sale
securities............................................................
FHLB dividends .....................................................
Other.......................................................................
Total deferred tax liabilities...............................
$
$
4,193
104
349
--
1,080
199
1,669
1,280
2,077
282
11,233
(1,196 )
--
(4,879 )
(205 )
(1,259 )
(260 )
--
(98 )
--
(7,897 )
$
2,056
104
--
2,753
616
--
--
--
--
31
5,560
$
(702 )
--
(1,265)
(368)
--
--
(1,091 )
(25 )
--
(3,451 )
Net deferred tax assets. .......................................................
$
3,336
$
2,109
The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in
which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities,
projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. Based upon the level of historical taxable
income and estimates of future taxable income over the periods for which the deferred tax assets are deductible, management believes
it is more likely than not the Company will realize the benefits of these deductible differences at December 31, 2004.
75
PROSPERITY BANCSHARES, INC.
®
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
14. STOCK INCENTIVE PROGRAMS
The Company had two stock-based employee compensation plans at December 31, 2004. Prior to 2003, the Company
accounted for those plans under the recognition and measurement provisions of APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees, and related Interpretations. No stock-based employee compensation cost was reflected in previously reported results, as
all options granted under those plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of
grant. In December 2002, the FASB issued Statement No. 148 (SFAS 148). Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition
and Disclosure, an amendment to FASB Statement 123. SFAS 148 provides alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change
to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. SFAS 148 is effective for financial statements
for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002. Effective January 1, 2003, the Company adopted the fair value recognition
provisions of FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, as provided by SFAS No. 148 for stock-based
employee compensation.
During 1995, the Company's Board of Directors approved a stock option plan (the "1995 Plan") for executive officers and
key associates to purchase common stock of Bancshares. A total of 660,000 options have been granted under the 1995 plan as of
December 31, 2004. Compensation expense was not recognized for the stock options granted under the 1995 Plan because the options
had an exercise price approximating the fair value of Bancshares' common stock at the date of grant. The maximum number of shares
reserved for issuance pursuant to options granted under the 1995 Plan is 680,000 (after two-for-one and four-for-one stock splits).
Options to acquire a total of 88,000 shares of common stock of Bancshares were outstanding at December 31, 2004 of which 3,000
shares were exercisable.
During 1998, the Company's Board of Directors and shareholders approved a second stock option plan (the "1998 Plan")
which authorizes the issuance of up to 920,000 (after two-for-one stock split) shares of the common stock of Bancshares under both
"non-qualified" and "incentive" stock options to employees and "non-qualified" stock options to directors who are not employees.
The 1998 Plan also provides for the granting of restricted stock awards, stock appreciation rights, phantom stock awards and
performance awards on substantially similar terms. Compensation expense was not recognized for the stock options granted under the
1998 Plan because the options had an exercise price approximating the fair value of Bancshares common stock at the date of grant.
Options to purchase a total of 784,500 shares of common stock of Bancshares were outstanding at December 31, 2004, of which
36,300 shares were exercisable.
In December 2004, the Company's Board of Directors established the Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive Plan
(the "2004 Plan"), which was approved by the Company's shareholders on February 23, 2005. The 2004 Plan authorizes the issuance
of up to 1,250,000 shares of Common Stock upon the exercise of options granted under the 2004 Plan or upon the grant or exercise, as
the case may be, of other awards granted under the 2004 Plan. The 2004 Plan provides for the granting of incentive and nonqualified
stock options to employees and nonqualified stock options to directors who are not employees. The 2004 Plan also provides for the
granting of shares of restricted stock, stock appreciation rights, phantom stock awards and performance awards on substantially
similar terms. As of the March 1, 2005, no options or other awards had been granted under the 2004 Plan.
On September 1, 2002, the Company acquired Paradigm Bancorporation. The options to purchase shares of Paradigm
common stock outstanding at the effective time of the transaction were converted (at a rate of 1 to 1.08658) into options to purchase a
total of 34,673 shares of Bancshares Common Stock at exercise prices ranging from $8.28 to $11.50 per share. The converted options
are governed by the original plan under which they were issued. A total of 14,782 options were outstanding at December 31, 2004.
On November 1, 2003, the Company acquired MainBancorp, Inc. A portion of the options to purchase shares of
MainBancorp common stock outstanding at the effective time of the transaction were converted at the option of the holder into options
to purchase a total of 100,851 shares of Bancshares Common Stock at exercise prices ranging from $8.03 to $16.26 per share. The
converted options are governed by the original plan under which they were issued. A total of 31,127 options were outstanding at
December 31, 2004.
On August 1, 2004, the Company acquired Liberty Bancshares, Inc. A portion of the options to purchase shares of Liberty
Bank common stock outstanding at the effective time of the transaction, at the option of the holder, were converted into options to
purchase a total of 107,948 shares of Bancshares Common Stock at exercise prices ranging from $3.66 to $7.79 per share. The
converted options are governed by the original plan under which they were issued. No options were outstanding at December 31,
2004.
76
PROSPERITY BANCSHARES, INC.
®
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
2004
2003
2002
Year Ended December 31,
Number
of
Options
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
Number
of
Options
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
Number
of
Options
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
Options outstanding, beginning of period. 599,692
Options granted ........................................ 576,948 (1)
Options forfeited.......................................
(52,000)
Options exercised ..................................... (206,231 )
$ 11.69
22.69
19.65
4.60
684,153
$ 8.65
164,851 (2) 14.58
15.91
(78,674 )
5.83
(170,638 )
530,180
287,804 (3)
(29,237 )
(104,504 )
$ 4.47
16.92
15.55
2.48
Options outstanding, end of period........... 918,409
---------------------------------------------
$ 19.64
599,692
$ 11.69
684,153
$ 8.65
(1) Includes options to acquire 107,948 shares of Bancshares Common Stock assumed in connection with the Liberty acquisition.
(2) Includes options to acquire 100,851 shares of Bancshares Common Stock assumed in connection with the MainBancorp acquisition.
(3) Includes options to acquire 34,673 shares of Bancshares Common Stock assumed in connection with the Paradigm acquisition.
At December 31, 2004, there were 85,209 options exercisable under all plans at a weighted average exercise price of $14.00.
During 2004, 260,231 options were exercised. At December 31, 2003, there were 79,192 options exercisable under all plans at a
weighted average exercise price of $9.68 and 170,638 options were exercised. At December 31, 2002, there were 54,153 options
exercisable under all plans and 104,504 options were exercised.
During 2004, the Company granted 469,000 options under the 1998 Plan. The options were granted at exercise prices
ranging from $23.60 per share to $27.02 per share. Compensation expense in the amount of $141,000 was recorded.
During 2003, the Company granted 64,000 options under the 1998 Plan. The options were granted at exercise prices ranging
from $19.30 per share to $23.10 per share. Compensation expense in the amount of $24,000 was recorded.
During 2002, the Company granted 254,000 options under the 1998 Plan. The options were granted at exercise prices
ranging from $16.55 per share to $19.01 per share. Compensation expense was not recorded for the stock options because the exercise
price approximated the fair value of common stock at the date of grant and the Company had not adopted SFAS No. 123.
The weighted-average fair value of the stock options granted on the respective grant dates ranged from $5.09 to $6.94 in
2004 and ranged from $3.89 to $5.13 in 2003 respectively. The weighted-average remaining contractual life of options outstanding as
of December 31, 2004 ranged from 9.05 years to 9.80 years for the options granted in 2004 and ranged from 8.35 years to 8.84 years
for the options granted in 2003, respectively. The weighted-average fair value of the stock options on the grant dates ranged from
$3.89 to $5.13 in 2003 and ranged from $3.86 to $4.10 in 2002 respectively. The weighted-average remaining contractual life of
options outstanding as of December 31, 2004 ranged from 8.35 years to 8.84 years for the options granted in 2003 and ranged from
7.33 years to 7.91 years for the options granted in 2002, respectively.
The fair value of options was estimated using an option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:
Year Ended December 31,
2004
2003
2002
Expected life... ..................................................................
Risk free interest rate .........................................................
Volatility ............................................................................
Dividend yield....................................................................
5.82
3.56%
22.00%
1.13%
4.50
2.58%
23.00%
1.25%
4.50
5.57%
23.00%
1.31%
77
PROSPERITY BANCSHARES, INC.
®
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
The following table presents information relating to the Company’s stock options outstanding at December 31, 2004:
Range of Exercise Prices
Options Outstanding 2004
Number
Outstanding
Weighted Average
Weighted Average
Exercise Price Remaining Life (years)
$ 0.00 - $ 5.00............................................................
$ 5.01 - $10.00.............................................................
$10.01 - $15.00.............................................................
$15.00 - $20.00.............................................................
$20.01-$25.00...............................................................
$25.01 - $30.00.............................................................
80,000
13,433
143,349
202,627
75,000
404,000
$
2.76
7.52
10.10
17.68
23.56
22.02
2.07
5.46
8.36
7.76
9.34
9.80
918,409
$ 19.64
8.35
15. PROFIT SHARING PLAN
The Company has adopted a profit sharing plan pursuant to Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code whereby the
participants may contribute a percentage of their compensation as permitted under the Code. Matching contributions are made at the
discretion of the Company. Presently, The Company matches 50 % of an employee's contributions, up to 15% of compensation, not to
exceed the maximum allowable pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code and excluding catch-up contributions. Such matching
contributions were approximately $681,000, $593,000 and $439,000, for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002,
respectively.
16. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Leases – The following table presents a summary of non-cancelable future operating lease commitments as of December 31,
2004 (dollars in thousands):
2005...........................................................
2006...........................................................
2007...........................................................
2008...........................................................
2009...........................................................
Thereafter ..................................................
Total ..........................................................
$ 2,028
1,890
1,753
1,419
1,102
2,548
$ 10,740
It is expected that in the normal course of business, expiring leases will be renewed or replaced by leases on other property or
equipment.
Rent expense under all noncancelable operating lease obligations aggregated approximately $1.8 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004, $1.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 and $1.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2002.
Litigation -- The Company has been named as a defendant in various legal actions arising in the normal course of business.
In the opinion of management, after reviewing such claims with outside counsel, resolution of such matters will not have a materially
adverse impact on the consolidated financial statements.
17. REGULATORY MATTERS
The Company and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking
agencies. Any institution that fails to meet its minimum capital requirements is subject to actions by regulators that could have a direct
material effect on the Company's and the Bank’s financial statements. Under the capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory
framework for prompt corrective action, the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines based on the Bank’s assets, liabilities and
certain off- balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Company's and the Bank’s capital amounts
and the Bank’s classification under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action are also subject to qualitative judgements
by the regulators about the components, risk weightings and other factors.
78
PROSPERITY BANCSHARES, INC.
®
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
To meet the capital adequacy requirements, the Company and the Bank must maintain minimum capital amounts and ratios
as defined in the regulations. Management believes, as of December 31, 2004 that the Company and the Bank met all capital adequacy
requirements to which they are subject.
At December 31, 2004, the most recent notification from the FDIC categorized the Bank as “well capitalized” under the
regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well capitalized the Bank must maintain minimum total risk-
based, Tier I risk-based and Tier I leverage ratios as set forth in the table. There have been no conditions or events since that
notification which management believes have changed the Bank’s category.
The following is a summary of the Company's and the Bank’s capital ratios at December 31, 2004 and 2003 (dollars in
thousands):
Actual
For Capital
Adequacy Purposes
To Be Categorized As
Well Capitalized Under
Prompt Corrective
Action Provisions
Amount
Ratio
Amount
Ratio
Amount
Ratio
CONSOLIDATED:
As of December 31, 2004:
Total Capital
(to Risk Weighted Assets) ....................
$173,179
14.67%
$94,411
8.0%
N/A
N/A
Tier I Capital
(to Risk Weighted Assets) ....................
160,074
13.56
47,205
Tier I Capital
(to Average Tangible Assets) ...............
160,074
6.30
76,218
4.0
3.0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
As of December 31, 2003:
Total Capital
(to Risk Weighted Assets) ....................
$161,154
16.90%
$76,282
8.0%
N/A
N/A
Tier I Capital
(to Risk Weighted Assets) ....................
150,809
15.82
38,141
Tier I Capital
(to Average Tangible Assets) ...............
150,809
7.10
63,753
4.0
3.0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Actual
For Capital
Adequacy Purposes
To Be Categorized As
Well Capitalized Under
Prompt Corrective
Action Provisions
Amount
Ratio
Amount
Ratio
Amount
Ratio
PROSPERITY BANK® ONLY:
As of December 31, 2004:
Total Capital
(to Risk Weighted Assets) ....................
$167,157
14.20%
$94,156
8.0%
$117,695
10.0%
Tier I Capital
(to Risk Weighted Assets) ....................
154,052
13.09
47,078
4.0%
70,617
Tier I Capital
(to Average Tangible Assets) ...............
154,052
6.07
76,120
3.0%
126,867
6.0
5.0
As of December 31, 2003:
Total Capital
(to Risk Weighted Assets) ....................
$146,823
15.40%
$76,262
8.0%
$95,328
10.0%
Tier I Capital
(to Risk Weighted Assets) ....................
136,478
14.32
38,131
Tier I Capital
(to Average Tangible Assets)................
136,478
6.43
63,724
4.0
3.0
57,197
106,207
6.0
5.0
Dividends paid by Bancshares and the Bank are subject to restrictions by certain regulatory agencies. Dividends paid by
Bancshares during the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 were $6.7 million and $4.9 million, respectively. There were $40.0
million of dividends paid by the Bank to Bancshares during the year ended 2004 and $37.9 million paid by the Bank to Bancshares
during the year ended 2003.
79
PROSPERITY BANCSHARES, INC.
®
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
18. DISCLOSURES ABOUT FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Disclosures of the estimated fair value amounts of financial instruments have been determined by the Company using
available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. However, considerable judgment is necessarily required in
interpreting market data to develop the estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily
indicative of the amounts the Company could realize in a current market exchange. The use of different market assumptions and/or
estimation methodologies could have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments for which
it is practicable to estimate that value:
Cash and Cash Equivalents -- For these short-term instruments, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.
Interest-Bearing Deposits in Financial Institutions—The carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.
Securities -- For securities held as investments, fair value equals quoted market price, if available. If a quoted market price is
not available, fair value is estimated using quoted market prices for similar securities.
Loan Receivables -- For certain homogeneous categories of loans (such as some residential mortgages and other consumer
loans), fair value is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the risk-free Treasury rate for the applicable maturity,
adjusted for servicing and credit risk. The carrying value of variable rate loans approximates fair value because the loans reprice
frequently to current market rates.
Junior Subordinated Debentures– The fair value of the junior subordinated debentures was calculated using the quoted
market price.
Deposits -- The fair value of demand deposits, savings accounts and certain money market deposits is the amount payable on
demand at the reporting date. The fair value of fixed-maturity certificates of deposit is estimated using the rates currently offered for
deposits of similar remaining maturities.
Other Borrowings -- Rates currently available to the Company for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities are used
to estimate the fair value of existing debt using a discounted cash flows methodology.
Off-Balance Sheet Financial Instruments -- The fair value of commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is
estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreement
and the present creditworthiness of the counterparties.
Securities Sold Under Repurchase Agreements -- The fair value of securities sold under repurchase agreements is the
amount payable on demand at the reporting date.
80
PROSPERITY BANCSHARES, INC.
®
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
The estimated fair values of the Company's interest-earning financial instruments are as follows (dollars in thousands):
December 31,
2004
2003
Carrying
Amount
Fair
Value
Carrying
Amount
Fair
Value
Financial assets:
Cash and due from banks.........................................
Interest bearing deposits in financial institutions.....
Federal funds sold....................................................
Held to maturity securities.......................................
Available for sale securities... ..................................
Loans .......................................................................
Less allowance for credit losses...............................
Total .....................................................................................
Financial liabilities:
Deposits ...................................................................
Junior subordinated debentures................................
Other borrowings .....................................................
Securities sold under repurchase agreements...........
Federal Home Loan Bank notes payable .................
Total .....................................................................................
$
58,760
200
79,150
1,125,109
177,683
1,035,513
$
58,760
200
79,150
1,124,500
177,683
1,046,218
(13,105 )
(13,105 )
$ 2,463,310
$ 2,473,406
$ 2,317,076
47,424
--
25,058
13,116
$ 2,402,674
$ 2,322,213
42,795
--
25,058
14,021
$ 2,404,087
$
71,983
200
11,730
1,113,232
263,648
770,053
(10,345 )
$ 2,220,501
$ 2,083,748
59,804
--
19,006
11,929
$ 2,174,487
$
71,983
200
11,730
1,122,451
263,648
782,961
(10,345 )
$ 2,242,628
$ 2,089,859
60,704
--
19,006
13,015
$ 2,182,584
The differences in fair value and carrying value of commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit were not
material at December 31, 2004 and 2003.
The fair value estimates presented herein are based on pertinent information available to management as of the dates
indicated. Although management is not aware of any factors that would significantly affect the estimated fair value amounts, such
amounts have not been comprehensively revalued for purposes of these financial statements since those dates and, therefore, current
estimates of fair value may differ significantly from the amounts presented herein.
81
PROSPERITY BANCSHARES, INC.
®
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
19. JUNIOR SUBORDINATED DEBENTURES
At December 31, 2004, the Company had four issues of junior subordinated debentures outstanding totaling $47.4 million as
shown in the following table:
Description
Issuance Date
Trust
Preferred
Securities
Outstanding
Prosperity Statutory Trust II
July 31, 2001
$15,000,000
Paradigm Capital Trust II (1)
Aug. 31, 2002
6,000,000
Junior
Subordinated
Debt Owed
to Trusts
Maturity
Date
$15,464,000
July 31, 2031
6,186,000
Feb. 20, 2031
Interest Rate
3-month LIBOR
+ 3.58%, not to
exceed 12.50%
3-month LIBOR
+ 4.50%
Prosperity Statutory Trust III
Aug. 15, 2003
12,500,000
6.50%(2)
12,887,000
Sept. 17, 2033
Prosperity Statutory Trust IV
Dec. 30, 2003
12,500,000
6.50%(3)
12,887,000 Dec. 30, 2033
______________________________
(1) Assumed in connection with the Paradigm acquisition on September 1, 2002.
(2) The debentures bear a fixed interest rate until September 17, 2008, when the rate begins to float on a quarterly basis based on the three-month
LIBOR plus 3.00%.
(3) The debentures bear a fixed interest rate until December 30, 2008, when the rate begins to float on a quarterly basis based on the three-month
LIBOR plus 2.85%.
On December 31, 2004, the Company redeemed in full the $12.4 million in junior subordinated debentures issued to
Prosperity Capital Trust I. Prosperity Capital Trust I in turn redeemed in full the trust preferred securities and common securities it
issued.
Each of the trusts is a capital or statutory business trust organized for the sole purpose of issuing trust securities and investing
the proceeds in the Company's junior subordinated debentures. The preferred trust securities of each trust represent preferred
beneficial interests in the assets of the respective trusts and are subject to mandatory redemption upon payment of the junior
subordinated debentures held by the trust. The common securities of each trust are wholly-owned by the Company. Each trust's ability
to pay amounts due on the trust preferred securities is solely dependent upon the Company making payment on the related junior
subordinated debentures. The debentures, which are the only assets of each trust, are subordinate and junior in right of payment to all
of the Company's present and future senior indebtedness. The Company has fully and unconditionally guaranteed each trust's
obligations under the trust securities issued by each respective trust to the extent not paid or made by each trust, provided such trust
has funds available for such obligations.
Under the provisions of each issue of the debentures, the Company has the right to defer payment of interest on the
debentures at any time, or from time to time, for periods not exceeding five years. If interest payments on either issue of the
debentures are deferred, the distributions on the applicable trust preferred securities and common securities will also be deferred.
In late 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Interpretation No. 46R (FIN 46R), "Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities, an interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51 (Revised December 2003)." FIN 46R requires that
trust preferred securities be deconsolidated from the Company's consolidated financial statements. The Company adopted FIN 46R on
January 1, 2004 and as a result, no longer reflects the trust preferred securities in its consolidated financial statements. Instead, the
junior subordinated debentures are shown as liabilities in the Company's consolidated balance sheets and interest expense associated
with the junior subordinated debentures is shown as interest expense in the Company's consolidated statements of income.
82
PROSPERITY BANCSHARES, INC.
®
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
20. PARENT COMPANY ONLY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
PROSPERITY BANCSHARES, INC.
(Parent Company Only)
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31,
2004
2003
(Dollars in thousands)
ASSETS
Cash .....................................................................
Investment in subsidiary ......................................
Investment in Prosperity Capital Trust I ..............
Investment in Prosperity Statutory Trust II..........
Investment in Prosperity Statutory Trust III ........
Investment in Prosperity Statutory Trust IV ........
Investment in Paradigm Capital Trust II..............
Goodwill, net .......................................................
Other assets..........................................................
TOTAL .......................................................................
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
LIABILITIES:
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities ......
Junior subordinated debentures ...........................
Total liabilities ..........................................
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Common stock .....................................................
Capital surplus. ....................................................
Retained earnings.................................................
Unrealized (loss) gain on available
for sale securities, net of tax benefit and tax .....
Less treasury stock, at cost, 37,088 shares
Total shareholders' equity ..........................
$ 4,614
311,656
--
464
387
387
186
3,983
1,753
$323,430
$
359
47,424
47,783
22,418
134,288
122,647
(3,099 )
(607 )
275,647
TOTAL .......................................................................
$323,430
$ 14,398
259,284
380
464
387
387
186
3,983
245
$279,714
$
322
59,804
60,126
20,967
102,594
94,610
2,024
(607 )
219,588
$279,714
83
PROSPERITY BANCSHARES, INC.
®
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
PROSPERITY BANCSHARES, INC.
(Parent Company Only)
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
OPERATING INCOME:
Dividends from subsidiaries.....................
Other income............................................
Total income ...................................
OPERATING EXPENSE:
Junior subordinated debentures interest
expense .................................................
Other expenses .........................................
Total operating expense .................
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX BENEFIT AND
EQUITY IN UNDISTRIBUTED EARNINGS OF
SUBSIDIARIES.............................................
FEDERAL INCOME TAX BENEFIT ...............
INCOME BEFORE EQUITY IN UNDISTRIBUTED
EARNINGS OF SUBSIDIARIES..................
(DISTRIBUTIONS IN EXCESS OF EARNINGS)
EQUITY IN UNDISTRIBUTED EARNINGS
OF SUBSIDIARIES.....................................
2004
For the Years Ended December 31,
2003
(Dollars in thousands)
2002
$
40,000
112
40,112
$
37,900
79
37,979
$
18,350
66
18,416
4,046
369
4,415
2,630
278
2,908
2,170
174
2,344
35,697
1,498
35,071
990
16,072
797
37,195
36,061
16,869
(2,488 )
(9,513)
4,452
NET INCOME ...................................................
$
34,707
$
26,548
$
21,321
84
PROSPERITY BANCSHARES, INC.
®
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (Continued)
PROSPERITY BANCSHARES, INC.
(Parent Company Only)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Years Ended December 31,
2003
2004
2002
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income ....................................................
Adjustments to reconcile net income
to net cash provided by operating activities:
Equity in undistributed earnings
of subsidiaries........................................
Amortization of goodwill ..........................
(Increase) decrease in other assets. ............
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest
payable and other liabilities ..................
Total adjustments.......................................
Net cash provided by
(Dollars in thousands)
$ 34,707
$ 26,548
$ 21,321
2,488
--
(1,508 )
37
(1,017 )
9,513
--
369
( 164 )
9,718
(4,452 )
--
268
(43 )
(4,227 )
operating activities.....................
35,724
36,266
17,094
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Capital contribution to subsidiary..................
Net cash used in
investing activities ....................
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Issuance of common stock.............................
Redemption of junior subordinated
debentures (net) .........................................
Payments of cash dividends...........................
Cash paid to dissenting shareholders .............
Stock option compensation expense ..............
Cash paid for acquisitions..............................
Proceeds from issuance of junior
subordinated debentures (net) ................
Net cash used in by
financing activities………….
NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS. .....................
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING
OF PERIOD ..................................................
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF
PERIOD ........................................................
(10 )
(10 )
--
--
--
--
1,047
995
260
(12,000 )
(6,670 )
--
141
(28,016 )
--
(4,855 )
--
--
(44,805 )
--
(3,866 )
(3 )
--
(24,789)
--
24,770
--
(45,498 )
(23,895 )
(28,398)
(9,784 )
12,371
(11,304)
14,398
2,027
433
$
4,614
$ 14,398
$
2,027
85
Prosperity Bancshares, Inc.® Board of Directors
Ned S. Holmes
Chairman of the Board
James A. Bouligny
Perry Mueller, Jr., D.D.S.
Robert H. Steelhammer
David Zalman
President & Chief Executive Officer
Charles A. Davis, Jr.
A. Virgil Pace, Jr.
H. E. (Tim) Timanus, Jr.
Executive Vice President & Chief Operating Officer
William H. Fagan, M. D.
Tracy T. Rudolph
Charles J. Howard, M. D.
Harrison Stafford II
Prosperity Bancshares, Inc.® Officers
left to right
David Zalman
President & Chief Executive Officer
David Hollaway, CPA
Chief Financial Officer
denise Urbanovsky
Corporate Secretary
H. E. (Tim) Timanus, Jr.,
Executive Vice President & Chief Operating Officer
Peter Fisher
General Counsel
James D. (Dan) Rollins III
Senior Vice President
Prosperity Bank® Board of Directors
David Zalman
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
Peter Fisher
Vice Chairman & General Counsel
Errol John Dietze
Ned S. Holmes, Jr.
Jack Lord
Joseph B. Swinbank
Fred Zeidman
H. E. (Tim) Timanus, Jr.
President. & Chief Operating Officer
Edward Safady
Chairman, Austin Area Banking Centers, Austin
Leah Henderson
Clyde Lacy
Perry Mueller, Jr., D.D.S.
D. R. (Tom) Uher
Jim Barta, Advisory Director
James D. (Dan) Rollins III
Vice Chairman
Gerald Clark
Ned S. Holmes
Mohammad Ladjevardian
Matthew W. Plummer, Jr., D.M.D.
Joe Zalman, Jr.
Jason Downie, Advisory Director
Prosperity Bank® Executive Committee
David Zalman
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
H. E. (Tim) Timanus, Jr.
President & Chief Operating Officer
Peter Fisher
Vice Chairman & General Counsel
David Hollaway, CPA
Chief Financial Officer
James D. (Dan) Rollins III
Vice Chairman
Randy D. Hester
Chief Lending Officer, President Brazoria County
Banking Centers, West Columbia
Donald A. Bolton, Jr.
President, South Texas Area Banking Centers,
Victoria
Robert L. Benter
President, Houston Area Banking Centers,
Houston
Edward Safady
Chairman, Austin Area Banking Centers,
Austin
Jay W. Porter, Jr.
President, North Houston Banking Centers,
Houston
Mark D. Humphrey
President, Clear Lake & Hitchcock
Banking Centers, Houston
Thomas A. Miller
President, Wharton Banking Center,
Wharton
Chris A. Bagley
Chief Credit Officer, President
Waugh Drive Banking Center, Houston
Delos (Deke) Hayes
President, Dallas Area Banking Centers,
Dallas
Chris J. Delaup
President, River Oaks Banking Center,
Houston
Randall Reeves
President, Downtown Banking Center,
Houston
Investor information
Investor information
CORPORATE OFFICE
CORPORATE OFFICE
Prosperity Bancshares, Inc.®
Prosperity Bancshares, Inc.®
Prosperity Bank Plaza
Prosperity Bank Plaza
4295 San Felipe
4295 San Felipe
Houston, TX 77027
Houston, TX 77027
Telephone (713) 693-9300
Telephone (713) 693-9300
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
Copies of the Company’s 2004 Annual Report
Copies of the Company’s 2004 Annual Report
on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and
on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission will be mailed to share-
Exchange Commission will be mailed to share-
holders and other interested persons upon written
holders and other interested persons upon written
request to:
request to:
TRANSFER AGENT & REGISTRAR
TRANSFER AGENT & REGISTRAR
DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT PLAN ADMINISTRATOR
DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT PLAN ADMINISTRATOR
Computershare Investor Services
Computershare Investor Services
350 Indiana Street, Suite 800
350 Indiana Street, Suite 800
Golden, CO 80041
Golden, CO 80041
Telephone (303) 262-0600
Telephone (303) 262-0600
James D. (Dan) Rollins III
James D. (Dan) Rollins III
Senior Vice President
Senior Vice President
Prosperity Bancshares, Inc.®
Prosperity Bancshares, Inc.®
Prosperity Bank Plaza
Prosperity Bank Plaza
4295 San Felipe
4295 San Felipe
Houston, TX 77027
Houston, TX 77027
INVESTOR INQUIRIES
INVESTOR INQUIRIES
Analysts, investors, and others desiring
Analysts, investors, and others desiring
additional financial data about
additional financial data about
Prosperity Bancshares, Inc.® may contact:
Prosperity Bancshares, Inc.® may contact:
James D. (Dan) Rollins III
James D. (Dan) Rollins III
Senior Vice President
Senior Vice President
Prosperity Bancshares, Inc.®
Prosperity Bancshares, Inc.®
Prosperity Bank Plaza
Prosperity Bank Plaza
4295 San Felipe
4295 San Felipe
Houston, TX 77027
Houston, TX 77027
Telephone (713) 693-9300
Telephone (713) 693-9300
Facsimile (713) 693-9309
Facsimile (713) 693-9309
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
Deloitte & Touche, L. L. P.
Deloitte & Touche, L. L. P.
333 Clay Street, Suite 2300
333 Clay Street, Suite 2300
Houston, TX 77002-4196
Houston, TX 77002-4196
COUNSEL
COUNSEL
Bracewell & Patterson, L. L. P.
Bracewell & Patterson, L. L. P.
711 Louisiana Street, Suite 2900
711 Louisiana Street, Suite 2900
Houston, TX 77002-2781
Houston, TX 77002-2781
COMMON STOCK LISTING
COMMON STOCK LISTING
Shares of Prosperity Bancshares, Inc.®
Shares of Prosperity Bancshares, Inc.®
common stock are listed on the
common stock are listed on the
NASDAQ Stock Market under the symbol PRSP.
NASDAQ Stock Market under the symbol PRSP.
TRUST PREFERRED SECURITIES LISTING
TRUST PREFERRED SECURITIES LISTING
Shares of Paradigm Capital Trust II
Shares of Paradigm Capital Trust II
trust preferred securities are listed on the OTC
trust preferred securities are listed on the OTC
Bulletin Board under the symbol PDCTP.
Bulletin Board under the symbol PDCTP.
Prosperity Bancshares, Inc® is a registered financial holding company. Prosperity Bank®, its primary subsidiary, is a full-service bank that
Prosperity Bancshares, Inc® is a registered financial holding company. Prosperity Bank®, its primary subsidiary, is a full-service bank that
provides a full range of financial products and services to small and medium-sized businesses and consumers through fifty-eight (58)
provides a full range of financial products and services to small and medium-sized businesses and consumers through fifty-eight (58)
full-service banking locations in the Greater Houston Metropolitan area, the Dallas area, the Austin area, and in eight (8) contiguous
full-service banking locations in the Greater Houston Metropolitan area, the Dallas area, the Austin area, and in eight (8) contiguous
counties south and southwest of Houston, generally along the NAFTA Highway (US 59).
counties south and southwest of Houston, generally along the NAFTA Highway (US 59).
© Prosperity Bancshares, Inc.® 2005
© Prosperity Bancshares, Inc.® 2005