Annual Report 2006 Value Growth Opportunity Momentum Directors’ report The directors’ report of Prudential plc for the year ended 31 December 2006 is set out on pages 1 to 81, and includes the sections of the Annual Report referred to in these pages. Directors’ report Overview Prudential plc 1 2 Key performance indicators 3 Group financial highlights 4 Chairman’s statement 6 Group Chief Executive’s review 10 Value 12 Growth 14 Opportunity 16 Momentum Operating and financial review 19 Key performance indicators 22 Group overview 30 Business unit review: Insurance operations 30 United Kingdom 34 United States 37 Asia Asset management 42 Global 42 M&G 44 Asia Fund Management 45 PPM America Banking 46 Egg 47 Other corporate information 54 Risk management 67 Corporate responsibility review Corporate governance 73 Corporate governance report 80 Board of directors Other report to shareholders 83 Directors’ remuneration report 96 Summary of statutory and supplementary IFRS and EEV basis results Group financial statements 98 Index to Group financial statements 99 Consolidated income statement 100 Statement of changes in equity 102 Consolidated balance sheet 104 Consolidated cash flow statement Notes on the Group financial statements 105 Section A: Background and adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) 125 Section B: Summary of results 136 Section C: Group risk management 139 Section D: Life assurance business 176 Section E: Banking operations 181 Section F: Income statement notes 189 Section G: Financial assets and liabilities 200 Section H: Other information on balance sheet items 219 Section I: Other notes 240 Balance sheet of the parent company 241 Notes on the parent company financial statement 250 Statement of directors' responsibilities in respect of the Annual Report and the financial statements 251 Independent auditor's report to the members of Prudential plc 252 European Embedded Value (EEV) basis supplementary information 256 Notes on the European Embedded Value (EEV) basis supplementary information 281 Statement of directors' responsibilities in respect of the European Embedded Value (EEV) basis supplementary information 281 Independent auditor's report to Prudential plc on the European Embedded Value (EEV) basis supplementary information Additional information 282 Shareholder information 284 How to contact us Directors’ report: Prudential at a glance Our brands Financial highlights Comparisons are quoted at constant exchange rates Jackson National Life Insurance Company (Jackson) is one of the largest life insurance companies in the United States with three million policies and contracts in force. • Record APE sales of £614 million were up 21 per cent on prior year. New business profit margin (% of APE) of 42 per cent up from 41 per cent in the prior year. • EEV operating profit on continuing operations of £718 million, up 19 per cent on prior year in underlying terms. • IFRS operating profit on continuing operations of £408 million, up 14 per cent on prior year. Prudential is a leading life and pensions provider in the United Kingdom. M&G is Prudential's UK and European fund manager with £164 billion of funds under management as at 31 December 2006. • APE sales grew one per cent in 2006 to £900 million. • In 2006 operating profit grew 25 per cent • New business EEV grew nine per cent to £266 million. • IFRS operating profit increased 25 per cent to £500 million in 2006. to £204 million and underlying profits grew 28 per cent to £177 million. • Gross fund inflows increased by 70 per cent to £13.5 billion. Net fund inflows increased by 58 per cent to £6.1 billion. Operations and products Jackson offers variable, fixed and fixed index annuities, as well as term and permanent life insurance and institutional products. Through its affiliates and subsidiaries, Jackson also provides asset management and retail brokerage services. Jackson markets products in 50 states and the District of Columbia (in the State of New York through Jackson National Life Insurance Company of New York) through independent broker-dealers, independent agents, banks, regional broker-dealers and the registered investment adviser channel. Retail products • Annuities • Corporate pensions • With-profits and unit-linked bonds • Savings and investments • Protection • Equity release • Health insurance Wholesale products • Bulk annuities • Annuity back-books Jackson’s investment portfolio manager, PPM America Inc., manages over US$74 billion of assets. Product distribution channels • Business to business (consulting actuaries and Customers Three million policies and contracts in force Staff 2,700 benefit advisers) • Partnerships (affinities and banks) • Independent financial advisers • Multi-tie panels • Direct to customers (telephone, internet and mail) Location Headquartered in Lansing, Michigan Customers More than seven million Staff 6,000 Locations Dublin, London, Mumbai, Reading, Stirling On 29 January 2007 we announced that we had entered into a binding agreement to sell Egg Banking plc, our UK banking business, to Citi. Under the terms of the Agreement, the consideration payable is £575 million in cash subject to adjustment to reflect any change in net asset value between 31 December 2006 and completion. The transaction is subject to regulatory approvals and is expected to complete by the end of April 2007. Details of Egg’s performance during 2006 can be found in this Annual Report. M&G independently manages assets on behalf of a wide range of retail and institutional investors. M&G also acts as fund manager on many of the life and pensions products sold by Prudential in the UK and Europe, as well as managing Prudential’s balance sheet for profit. Retail business • Open Ended Investment Companies (OEICs) and Unit Trusts (UTs) • Investment Trusts (ITs) • Individual Savings Accounts (ISAs) and Personal Equity Plans (PEPs) M&G and Prudential branded mutual funds are distributed to retail investors in the UK, Europe, Asia and South Africa. M&G manages £19.2 billion of retail assets, invested in equities, fixed income and property. In the UK M&G is the fourth largest retail fund manager, with approximately one million unit holder accounts. Institutional business • Segregated fixed interest, pooled pension funds, structured and private finance • Segregated, pooled and global macro strategy mandates • Institutional customers include pension funds, insurance companies and other financial institutions M&G manages £25.8 billion of institutional assets, invested in equities, fixed income, property and private equity. Internal business M&G manages assets on behalf of Prudential’s long-term business funds, including with-profits and unit-linked funds, annuities and corporate pension products. M&G manages £119 billion of assets for Prudential customers, invested in equities, fixed income, property and private equity. Prudential Finance • Manages Prudential’s balance sheet • Leverages Prudential and M&G’s positioning and skills for profit Activities include bridging transactions, property financing and securities lending. Staff 1,500 Locations UK: London, Chelmsford Europe: Austria, France, Germany, Italy, Luxembourg, Spain, Switzerland Other: South Africa Prudential has life insurance and fund management operations in 12 markets. Life insurance • Sales on an APE basis grew 30 per cent • Represents 49 per cent of total Group new business profit • IFRS operating profit of £189 million, up 11 per cent on 2005, excluding exceptional items of net positive £30 million in 2005. Prudential is the leading European-based life insurer in Asia in terms of market coverage and number of top five market positions. Prudential Corporation Asia provides a comprehensive range of savings, protection and investment products tailored to the needs of each local market. It pioneered unit-linked products in Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia, the Philippines and Taiwan. In 2006, our operation in China was awarded eight new life licences, making a total of 18. Currently, Prudential Corporation Asia has a network of over 284,000 agents serving more than seven million customers across the region. Major strategic partnerships • CITIC Group in China • ICICI Bank in India • In addition, Prudential Corporation Asia has a number of distribution partnerships that include a number of leading banks such as Standard Chartered Bank. Staff 12,500 Locations China, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Taiwan, Thailand, Vietnam Fund management • In 2006 operating profit grew 85 per cent to £50 million, excluding 2005 exceptional costs of £16 million. • Prudential Corporation Asia’s Fund Management manages £29.2 billion of assets, which includes £6.2 billion of assets from the Group, £10.6 billion from Prudential Corporation Asia’s Life Funds and £12.3 billion from the retail operations. This is an increase of 22 per cent from end 2005. Retail assets increased by 33 per cent. • Retail mutual fund net inflows increased by 90 per cent to £2.5 billion. Prudential Asia Fund Management independently manages assets on behalf of a wide range of retail and institutional investors in Asia. Prudential Asia Fund Management is also a fund manager for life and pension products sold by Prudential UK and Prudential Corporation Asia. Retail business Prudential branded mutual funds are distributed to retail investors across Asia. Prudential Asia Fund Management manages £12.3 billion of retail assets investing in equities, fixed income and structured products. Prudential also manages collective investment schemes under Luxemburg domiciled Société d'investissement à capital variable (SICAV) under UCITS III. In Asia Prudential Asia Fund Management is the second largest retail fund manager for Asian sourced assets ex-Japan as at June 2006 (source: Asia Asset Management Magazine) with approximately two million unit holder accounts. Institutional and internal business Prudential Asia Fund Management manages £16.8 billion of institutional and internal assets, investing in equities, fixed income, property and private equity. Institutional investors include pension funds, government and quasi government entities and other financial institutions. Major strategic partnerships • Bank of China International in Hong Kong • CITIC Group in China • ICICI Bank in India Staff 1,350 (100% of ventures) Locations China, Hong Kong, India, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Singapore, Taiwan, United Arab Emirates, Vietnam Santa Monica Bismarck Appleton Lansing Chicago Denver New York New Jersey Tampa Dublin Derby Dudley London Reading Berlin Also part of M&G • Prudential Property Investment Managers (PruPIM) • PPM Capital • PPM South Africa Milan Dubai Delhi Mumbai Bangkok Beijing Tianjin Shanghai Taipei Guangzhou Hong Kong Hanoi Ho Chi Minh Seoul Tokyo Manila Kuala Lumpur Singapore Jakarta Directors’ report: Prudential at a glance Our brands Financial highlights Comparisons are quoted at constant exchange rates Jackson National Life Insurance Company (Jackson) is one of the largest life insurance companies in the United States with three million policies and contracts in force. • Record APE sales of £614 million were up 21 per cent on prior year. New business profit margin (% of APE) of 42 per cent up from 41 per cent in the prior year. • EEV operating profit on continuing operations of £718 million, up 19 per cent on prior year in underlying terms. • IFRS operating profit on continuing operations of £408 million, up 14 per cent on prior year. Prudential is a leading life and pensions provider in the United Kingdom. M&G is Prudential's UK and European fund manager with £164 billion of funds under management as at 31 December 2006. • APE sales grew one per cent in 2006 to £900 million. • In 2006 operating profit grew 25 per cent • New business EEV grew nine per cent to £266 million. • IFRS operating profit increased 25 per cent to £500 million in 2006. to £204 million and underlying profits grew 28 per cent to £177 million. • Gross fund inflows increased by 70 per cent to £13.5 billion. Net fund inflows increased by 58 per cent to £6.1 billion. Operations and products Jackson offers variable, fixed and fixed index annuities, as well as term and permanent life insurance and institutional products. Through its affiliates and subsidiaries, Jackson also provides asset management and retail brokerage services. Jackson markets products in 50 states and the District of Columbia (in the State of New York through Jackson National Life Insurance Company of New York) through independent broker-dealers, independent agents, banks, regional broker-dealers and the registered investment adviser channel. Retail products • Annuities • Corporate pensions • With-profits and unit-linked bonds • Savings and investments • Protection • Equity release • Health insurance Wholesale products • Bulk annuities • Annuity back-books Jackson’s investment portfolio manager, PPM America Inc., manages over US$74 billion of assets. Product distribution channels • Business to business (consulting actuaries and Customers Three million policies and contracts in force Staff 2,700 benefit advisers) • Partnerships (affinities and banks) • Independent financial advisers • Multi-tie panels • Direct to customers (telephone, internet and mail) Location Headquartered in Lansing, Michigan Customers More than seven million Staff 6,000 Locations Dublin, London, Mumbai, Reading, Stirling On 29 January 2007 we announced that we had entered into a binding agreement to sell Egg Banking plc, our UK banking business, to Citi. Under the terms of the Agreement, the consideration payable is £575 million in cash subject to adjustment to reflect any change in net asset value between 31 December 2006 and completion. The transaction is subject to regulatory approvals and is expected to complete by the end of April 2007. Details of Egg’s performance during 2006 can be found in this Annual Report. M&G independently manages assets on behalf of a wide range of retail and institutional investors. M&G also acts as fund manager on many of the life and pensions products sold by Prudential in the UK and Europe, as well as managing Prudential’s balance sheet for profit. Retail business • Open Ended Investment Companies (OEICs) and Unit Trusts (UTs) • Investment Trusts (ITs) • Individual Savings Accounts (ISAs) and Personal Equity Plans (PEPs) M&G and Prudential branded mutual funds are distributed to retail investors in the UK, Europe, Asia and South Africa. M&G manages £19.2 billion of retail assets, invested in equities, fixed income and property. In the UK M&G is the fourth largest retail fund manager, with approximately one million unit holder accounts. Institutional business • Segregated fixed interest, pooled pension funds, structured and private finance • Segregated, pooled and global macro strategy mandates • Institutional customers include pension funds, insurance companies and other financial institutions M&G manages £25.8 billion of institutional assets, invested in equities, fixed income, property and private equity. Internal business M&G manages assets on behalf of Prudential’s long-term business funds, including with-profits and unit-linked funds, annuities and corporate pension products. M&G manages £119 billion of assets for Prudential customers, invested in equities, fixed income, property and private equity. Prudential Finance • Manages Prudential’s balance sheet • Leverages Prudential and M&G’s positioning and skills for profit Activities include bridging transactions, property financing and securities lending. Staff 1,500 Locations UK: London, Chelmsford Europe: Austria, France, Germany, Italy, Luxembourg, Spain, Switzerland Other: South Africa Prudential has life insurance and fund management operations in 12 markets. Life insurance • Sales on an APE basis grew 30 per cent • Represents 49 per cent of total Group new business profit • IFRS operating profit of £189 million, up 11 per cent on 2005, excluding exceptional items of net positive £30 million in 2005. Prudential is the leading European-based life insurer in Asia in terms of market coverage and number of top five market positions. Prudential Corporation Asia provides a comprehensive range of savings, protection and investment products tailored to the needs of each local market. It pioneered unit-linked products in Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia, the Philippines and Taiwan. In 2006, our operation in China was awarded eight new life licences, making a total of 18. Currently, Prudential Corporation Asia has a network of over 284,000 agents serving more than seven million customers across the region. Major strategic partnerships • CITIC Group in China • ICICI Bank in India • In addition, Prudential Corporation Asia has a number of distribution partnerships that include a number of leading banks such as Standard Chartered Bank. Staff 12,500 Locations China, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Taiwan, Thailand, Vietnam Fund management • In 2006 operating profit grew 85 per cent to £50 million, excluding 2005 exceptional costs of £16 million. • Prudential Corporation Asia’s Fund Management manages £29.2 billion of assets, which includes £6.2 billion of assets from the Group, £10.6 billion from Prudential Corporation Asia’s Life Funds and £12.3 billion from the retail operations. This is an increase of 22 per cent from end 2005. Retail assets increased by 33 per cent. • Retail mutual fund net inflows increased by 90 per cent to £2.5 billion. Prudential Asia Fund Management independently manages assets on behalf of a wide range of retail and institutional investors in Asia. Prudential Asia Fund Management is also a fund manager for life and pension products sold by Prudential UK and Prudential Corporation Asia. Retail business Prudential branded mutual funds are distributed to retail investors across Asia. Prudential Asia Fund Management manages £12.3 billion of retail assets investing in equities, fixed income and structured products. Prudential also manages collective investment schemes under Luxemburg domiciled Société d'investissement à capital variable (SICAV) under UCITS III. In Asia Prudential Asia Fund Management is the second largest retail fund manager for Asian sourced assets ex-Japan as at June 2006 (source: Asia Asset Management Magazine) with approximately two million unit holder accounts. Institutional and internal business Prudential Asia Fund Management manages £16.8 billion of institutional and internal assets, investing in equities, fixed income, property and private equity. Institutional investors include pension funds, government and quasi government entities and other financial institutions. Major strategic partnerships • Bank of China International in Hong Kong • CITIC Group in China • ICICI Bank in India Staff 1,350 (100% of ventures) Locations China, Hong Kong, India, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Singapore, Taiwan, United Arab Emirates, Vietnam Santa Monica Bismarck Appleton Lansing Chicago Denver New York New Jersey Tampa Dublin Derby Dudley London Reading Berlin Also part of M&G • Prudential Property Investment Managers (PruPIM) • PPM Capital • PPM South Africa Milan Dubai Delhi Mumbai Bangkok Beijing Tianjin Shanghai Taipei Guangzhou Hong Kong Hanoi Ho Chi Minh Seoul Tokyo Manila Kuala Lumpur Singapore Jakarta Annual Report 2006 Value Growth Opportunity Momentum Directors’ report The directors’ report of Prudential plc for the year ended 31 December 2006 is set out on pages 1 to 81, and includes the sections of the Annual Report referred to in these pages. Directors’ report Overview Prudential plc 1 2 Key performance indicators 3 Group financial highlights 4 Chairman’s statement 6 Group Chief Executive’s review 10 Value 12 Growth 14 Opportunity 16 Momentum Operating and financial review 19 Key performance indicators 22 Group overview 30 Business unit review: Insurance operations 30 United Kingdom 34 United States 37 Asia Asset management 42 Global 42 M&G 44 Asia Fund Management 45 PPM America Banking 46 Egg 47 Other corporate information 54 Risk management 67 Corporate responsibility review Corporate governance 73 Corporate governance report 80 Board of directors Other report to shareholders 83 Directors’ remuneration report 96 Summary of statutory and supplementary IFRS and EEV basis results Group financial statements 98 Index to Group financial statements 99 Consolidated income statement 100 Statement of changes in equity 102 Consolidated balance sheet 104 Consolidated cash flow statement Notes on the Group financial statements 105 Section A: Background and adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) 125 Section B: Summary of results 136 Section C: Group risk management 139 Section D: Life assurance business 176 Section E: Banking operations 181 Section F: Income statement notes 189 Section G: Financial assets and liabilities 200 Section H: Other information on balance sheet items 219 Section I: Other notes 240 Balance sheet of the parent company 241 Notes on the parent company financial statement 250 Statement of directors' responsibilities in respect of the Annual Report and the financial statements 251 Independent auditor's report to the members of Prudential plc 252 European Embedded Value (EEV) basis supplementary information 256 Notes on the European Embedded Value (EEV) basis supplementary information 281 Statement of directors' responsibilities in respect of the European Embedded Value (EEV) basis supplementary information 281 Independent auditor's report to Prudential plc on the European Embedded Value (EEV) basis supplementary information Additional information 282 Shareholder information 284 How to contact us Directors’ report: Overview Prudential plc Prudential plc is an international retail financial services group that aims to help people secure and enhance their own and their dependants’ financial well-being by providing savings, protection and other products and services suited to their needs. We have strong franchises in three of the largest and most attractive markets in the world, where rising wealth and changing demographics are fuelling demand for life insurance and other long-term savings and protection products. Our strategy is to build successful and increasingly profitable businesses in each of these markets, and thereby maximise returns to our shareholders over time. Value G r o Momentum w t h O pportu nit y Value We continue to maintain a relentless focus on profitability and value, concentrating resources where we can generate the best returns for shareholders. See page 10 Growth Our strong positions in the markets in which we operate mean we are well placed to capture an increasing share of profitable growth in each. See page 12 Opportunity As we look ahead, we see enormous opportunities in all three of our regions, and we feel confident we have the skills and resources to take advantage of them. See page 14 Momentum The momentum we have built can be seen in the growth of our insurance and asset management businesses around the world. See page 16 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 1 Directors’ report: Overview Key performance indicators Keyperformance indicators APE new business premiums PVNBP EEV new business profit +16% 2006 £2,470m 2005 £2,134m* +12% 2006 £18,947m 2005 £16,860m* +20% 2006 £1,039m 2005 £869m* External funds under management Holding company cash flow EEV operating profit from long-term business +26% 2006 £57.2bn 2005 £45.4bn* +65% 2006 £(104)m 2005 £(298)m** +28% 2006 £2,209m 2005 £1,722m* IFRS operating profit –7% 2006 £893m 2005 £958m* *Comparison at constant exchange rates (CER). **Comparison at reported exchange rates (RER). 2 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Directors’ report: Overview Group financial highlights Group financial highlights Results summary European Embedded Value (EEV) basis results* UK insurance operations M&G Egg UK operations US operations Asian operations Other income and expenditure UK restructuring costs Operating profit from continuing operations based on longer-term investment returns Goodwill impairment charge Short-term fluctuations in investment returns Mark to market value movements on core borrowings Shareholders' share of actuarial and other gains and losses on defined benefit pension schemes Effect of changes in economic assumptions and time value of cost of options and guarantees Profit from continuing operations before tax Operating earnings per share from continuing operations after related tax and minority interests* Basic earnings per share Shareholders' funds, excluding minority interests International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) basis results* Statutory IFRS basis results Profit after tax attributable to equity holders of the Company Basic earnings per share Shareholders' funds, excluding minority interests Supplementary IFRS basis information Operating profit from continuing operations based on longer-term investment returns Operating earnings per share from continuing operations after related tax and minority interests* Dividends per share declared and paid in reporting period Dividends per share relating to reporting period Funds under management 2006 £m 686 204 (145) 745 718 864 (298) (53) 1,976 – 745 85 207 59 3,072 2005 £m 426 163 44 633 755 568 (244) – 1,712 (120) 1,068 (67) (47) (302) 2,244 57.6p 91.7p 56.6p 66.9p £11.9bn £10.3bn 2006 2005 £874m £748m 36.2p 31.6p £5.5bn £5.2bn 2006 2005 £893m £957m 26.4p 32.2p 2006 2005 16.44p 15.95p 17.14p 16.32p £251bn £234bn *Basis of preparation The EEV basis results have been prepared in accordance with the European Embedded Value Principles issued by the CFO Forum of European Insurance Companies in May 2004 and expanded by the Additional Guidance on EEV disclosures published in October 2005. The basis of preparation of statutory IFRS basis results and supplementary IFRS basis information is consistent with that applied for the 2005 full year results and financial statements. Consistent with previous reporting practice, the Group analyses its EEV basis results and provides supplementary analysis of IFRS profit before tax attributable to shareholders, so as to distinguish operating profit based on longer-term investment returns from other constituent elements of total profit. On both the EEV and IFRS bases, operating earnings per share are calculated using operating profits from continuing operations based on longer-term investment returns, after tax and minority interests. These profits exclude goodwill impairment charges, short-term fluctuations in investment returns and the shareholders' share of actuarial and other gains and losses on defined benefit pension schemes. Under the EEV basis, where additional profit and loss effects arise, operating profit based on longer-term investment returns also excludes the mark to market value movements on core borrowings and the effect of changes in economic assumptions and changes in the time value of cost of options and guarantees arising from changes in economic factors. After adjusting for related tax and minority interests, the amounts for these items are included in the calculation of basic earnings per share. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 3 Directors’ report: Overview Chairman’s statement Chairman’s statement The business today is in robust health, and faces exciting prospects in each of our chosen markets Sir David Clementi Chairman Full year dividend per share +5% 2006 17.14p 2005 16.32p 4 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Directors’ report: Overview Chairman’s statement 2006 was another good year for Prudential around the world, with strong performances in both the insurance and asset management businesses. do, of course, further enhance our overall product range, enabling us to accommodate the needs of the vast majority of retail investors. We made excellent progress against all our key financial measures, with EEV operating profits strongly ahead, average margins across the Group up, and record performances in terms of assets under management in both M&G and Asia. The one exception to this pleasing performance was Egg, where deteriorating conditions in the UK personal loans market resulted in larger than expected losses for the year. In January, we announced that we had reached agreement to sell Egg to Citi, having concluded that the offer made to us would realise greater value for our shareholders than we could achieve in the foreseeable future by retaining it. Throughout the year, we paid careful attention to the Group’s cash flow and capital position. We are well placed to fund our current organic growth plans; and the strength of our capital position has allowed us to look again at our dividend policy. This is set out in the Group Chief Executive’s review. The full year dividend per share for 2006 has increased by five per cent to 17.14 pence per share. Turning to our individual businesses, our UK business had a strong 2006 with good growth in profitability. We saw both new business margins and internal rates of return improve and these remain towards the top end of the market. We are taking a disciplined approach to our participation in the market, focusing on those areas where we can use our core strengths to achieve an attractive return. We feel confident that there are opportunities for profitable growth, particularly in retirement savings and income, and that we are well placed to capture them. Our US business saw another year of excellent progress, as we continued to use our strengths in product innovation, relationship-led distribution and IT, to capture a profitable share of the growing retirement market. In the last five years, Jackson new business sales have more than doubled and, as the first wave of the country’s large body of baby-boomers move into retirement over the next two decades, we see plenty of scope for continued growth in this market. In Asia, we maintained our strong track record of growth, while meeting our commitment to go cash positive during the year. The opportunities in the region are as clear and significant as ever, with high economic growth rates, high savings rates, and increasing personal wealth. We remain confident that our business in the region will continue to prosper. In Asset Management, our businesses around the world go from strength to strength, and are significant and increasing contributors to our Group. Not only are they critical to the performance of our traditional insurance products, they are also an increasingly powerful source of non-capital intensive profits. In addition, they Across all our businesses, in addition to managing our capital position on a Group-wide basis, we continue to find new ways to leverage and share resources and knowledge in areas such as risk management, IT and product development, for the benefit of Prudential as a whole. We believe that there remains significant further scope for collaboration of this kind in future. Towards the end of 2006, we appointed Barry Stowe as Chief Executive of Prudential Corporation Asia and as a member of the Board. His broad knowledge of the Asian insurance markets will be a tremendous asset to us as we continue to drive forward our aggressive growth plans for the region. Following the Annual General Meeting, Roberto Mendoza will step down as a director and I would like to thank him for his significant contribution since he joined in 2000. As we continue to grow our business in many different countries, we are committed to contributing to the social and economic well-being of the communities in which we operate, and we encourage our employees to participate in initiatives that strengthen those communities. In 2005 we launched the Chairman’s Award, an international volunteering programme which gives all employees the opportunity to become involved with a local charitable project, and which provides financial support alongside the investment of our employees’ time. The first awards under this programme were made in 2006 and I had the opportunity to spend time with one of the winning projects, and see at first hand the positive impact such initiatives can have, when the Board recently visited India. Alongside these community projects we also continue to invest heavily in financial capability as a core part of our corporate responsibility programme, since we recognise the important part we can play in enabling consumers to make informed financial decisions. As one of the UK’s leading property investors, we take our responsibility to the environment seriously. Our property arm, PRUPIM, has established a strong reputation for its thought leadership in the area of sustainability and continues to be the only real estate investment manager accredited to internationally-recognised environmental standard ISO14001. More details of our corporate responsibility programmes can be found later in this report. Looking at the Group as a whole, we believe that the business today is in robust health, and faces exciting prospects in each of our chosen markets. The opportunities for growth, particularly in the retirement savings and income arena, are significant, and we feel confident that we have the skills and capabilities needed to take full advantage of them. As ever, the talents and commitment of our people around the world will remain critical to our success, and I would like to thank them for their vital contributions in 2006. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 5 Directors’ report: Overview Group Chief Executive’s review GroupChief Executive’s review Our results in 2006 demonstrate excellent and continued progress in the delivery of the Group’s growth and value agenda Mark Tucker Group Chief Executive Total EEV basis operating profit from continuing operations +15% 2006 £1,976m 2005 £1,711m* EEV basis shareholders’ funds APE new business premiums +15% 2006 £11.9bn 2005 £10.3bn** +16% 2006 £2,470m 2005 £2,134m* *Comparison at constant exchange rates (CER). **Comparison at reported exchange rates (RER). 6 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Directors’ report: Overview Group Chief Executive’s review The Group’s strategy is centred on optimising our competitive advantages in life assurance, becoming a leading provider of financial services for the retirement market, and on the further development of our asset management businesses. In implementing this strategy our clear aim is to secure superior growth in value for our shareholders. In 2006, we continued to focus on developing our position in our chosen markets of Asia, the US and the UK; markets that we believe offer the greatest opportunity for sustained profitable growth. Total Group operating profit before tax was £1,976 million on a European Embedded Value (EEV) basis, an increase of 15 per cent, and the Group’s return on embedded value was 13.5 per cent (2005: 15.5 per cent). Statutory International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) operating profit before tax was £893 million (2005: £957 million). Across the Group’s insurance operations, new business increased by 16 per cent to £2,470 million, on an APE basis. Profits on new business exceeded £1 billion for the first time, 20 per cent up on 2005. Average margins across the Group remained strong and were 42 per cent (41 per cent in 2005) and returns on new business have also improved. Operating profit from the insurance businesses was £2,209 million, on an EEV basis, increasing by 28 per cent on 2005, and IFRS operating profit increased by 15 per cent to £1,087 million. In asset management we delivered record net flows at M&G and in our rapidly growing retail businesses in Asia. Net inflows of £8.6 billion were 66 per cent ahead of 2005 and external funds under management increased to £57 billion (2005: £46 billion). Operating profit from these businesses was £254 million, up 46 per cent on 2005. Difficult trading conditions in the UK personal loans market led to losses at Egg, the Group’s UK banking business, of £145 million (2005: profit £44 million). In January 2007 we received an offer for Egg from Citi and the business was sold for £575 million in cash, subject to completion adjustments. We expect this transaction to complete by the end of April 2007. The Group’s cash flow developed strongly in 2006 and its capital position remains robust. Taking into account our plans for sustained high levels of growth and a normalised level of scrip dividend uptake we expect our operating cash flow to be positive in 2008. In light of this the Board has reviewed its longer-term dividend policy. The Board recommends a final dividend of 11.72 pence per share, bringing the full-year dividend to 17.14 pence per share, an increase of five per cent over the full year 2005 dividend of 16.32 pence. The full year dividend is covered 1.5 times by post-tax IFRS operating profit from continuing operations. The Board will focus on delivering a growing dividend, which will continue to be determined after taking into account the Group’s financial flexibility and opportunities to invest in areas of the business offering attractive returns. The Board believes that in the medium term a dividend cover of around two-times is appropriate. Insurance operations The Group’s position in Asia continues to develop rapidly with the region accounting for almost 50 per cent of the Group’s 2006 new business profits. One of the key priorities in the region in 2006 was to continue to build our distribution capability. Agency remains the major channel in the region and during the year we added 115,000 agents, to total 285,000 agents by the end of the year. Building the agency force in a disciplined way in developing markets such as India, China and Indonesia is critical to success, whereas in some of the more developed markets in the region such as Hong Kong and Singapore where agency numbers are more stable, the main focus is on increasing productivity. Non-agency distribution is also developing strongly and accounted for 30 per cent of new business in 2006 (26 per cent in 2005) as we established a number of new and important relationships during the year. As well as experiencing rapid growth Asia became cash positive in 2006, in line with our previous forecast, with a net remittance of £28 million to the Group. In 2007 and beyond, Asia offers significant potential for profitable growth and we are on track to deliver on our target to at least double 2005 new business profits by 2009. We are in all the region’s major markets and see further opportunity to build distribution, improve productivity and efficiency and increase sales of our market leading unit-linked products. We also see scope to increase sales to our seven million existing customers; to use our regional and Group expertise to play a key role as the retirement market develops in a number of Asian countries; to extend our direct distribution capabilities and to increase selectively our presence in the Accident and Health product sector across a number of markets in the region. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 7 Directors’ report: Overview Group Chief Executive’s review Group Chief Executive’s review continued Our strategy in the US is to focus on the opportunities that exist in the growing retirement market as the US baby boomers retire, with a particular emphasis on variable annuities. We have market- leading product flexibility and high levels of product innovation, a focus on advice-based distribution and on maintaining high service levels at low cost. As a result our retail sales in 2006 grew at more than double the rate of the market overall. Variable annuity sales increased by 48 per cent over 2005, and we have achieved compound growth of 45 per cent over a five-year period. In 2007, our aim is to capitalise on the market position that the Jackson team have built, growing distribution and further developing the product range to address both existing and new market areas. For example, in January 2007, we launched a new simplified retirement annuity aimed at mutual fund representatives, extending our distribution reach. We remain confident that we can continue to outperform the market and gain profitable market share. In the UK, retail insurance new business increased by 14 per cent in 2006 and overall new business sales were up one per cent. We continued to focus on writing for value across the UK business with average margins increasing to 30 per cent (27 per cent in 2005). Returns on new business improved to 15 per cent and remain high compared with the rest of the UK market. Notwithstanding this strong performance, we have continued to assess the positioning of our UK insurance operations, examining a broad range of potential options with a clear goal of maximising value for our shareholders. We are confident that there are profitable opportunities for the Group in the retirement income and savings market. We have significant competitive advantages in the retirement income market, in particular our flow of internal vestings from our back book of personal pensions, and this market remains very attractive. We therefore see retail annuities and equity release and the nurturing of our existing policyholders as key parts of our strategy. In the wholesale annuity market we also have distinct competitive advantages but we will only write business that meets our required returns. Much of our Wealth and Health business is low margin and our strategy will be to improve returns through a much narrower business, exiting segments that are unprofitable and concentrating our effort only where we have a material and sustainable competitive advantage and where we can achieve returns significantly in excess of the cost of capital. We have withdrawn from provision of front-end commission individual pensions and will also exit front-end commission unit-linked bonds, segments of the market where we do not see that adequate returns can be made. We believe there is an opportunity in the retirement savings market for us to capitalise on our proven low risk multi-asset investment capabilities. We will bring a new range of products to the market based on these capabilities and with improved returns through a focus on trail, rather than front-end commission. We will concentrate our advice-based distribution activity on the significant number of investors approaching retirement who have substantial assets outside personal or corporate pension plans, or have investments in poorly performing funds, and require inflation protection. We also see opportunity to develop further our already strong position in the corporate pensions market and we will improve returns by focusing on schemes with higher case sizes and holding costs as volumes grow. We will participate in the health market through our existing joint venture with Discovery, which will be expanded to include our new Flexible Protection product. A combination of the strength of the Prudential brand in the UK, clearly differentiated products and the operational capabilities of Discovery, provide an excellent base to deliver profitable growth in these markets. The joint venture will be led by Discovery. EEV basis operating profit from long-term business from continuing operations +28% 2006 £2,209m 2005 £1,722m* EEV basis new business profit +20% 2006 £1,039m 2005 £869m* Asset management business IFRS operating profit +46% 2006 £254m 2005 £174m* *Comparison at constant exchange rates (CER). 8 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Directors’ report: Overview Group Chief Executive’s review Actions are in place to realise 65 per cent of the previously announced cost savings target of £115 million* for the UK insurance business. We have increased our annualised target cost savings to £195 million by 2010 and our current estimate is that these savings will lead to a £60 million positive impact on embedded value. Total restructuring costs are estimated to be up to £165 million*. We have initiated discussions with the regulator on the possible reattribution of the inherited estate of the Group’s main with-profits fund in the UK, Prudential Assurance Company. An Independent Policyholder Advocate has been nominated to represent policyholders should a decision be taken to proceed. We will only proceed if there are clear benefits to both policyholders and shareholders. If a decision is taken to proceed a formal appointment of the Policyholder Advocate could be expected to take place later this year. With a focused strategy in the UK based on our competitive advantages, we see opportunities for growth in the retail market at high margins and returns relative to the overall market. In the wholesale annuity market we will write business that meets our required returns and by definition the flows will be lumpy year on year. We are maintaining our 14 per cent IRR target for new business and we expect the UK’s shareholder-backed business to become a net capital generator for the Group by 2010. Asset management Maintaining superior investment performance is the key factor in the continuing growth and success of the Group’s asset management businesses. In 2006, the performance of M&G in the UK and Europe and our asset management businesses in Asia has again been very strong, adding value to our insurance businesses worldwide, supporting record net inflows and continuing the growth of the Group’s external funds under management. In 2007, we will continue to build on the strong growth over recent years in both M&G and in Asia. In addition, Jackson will enter the US retail mutual fund market for the first time, a significant market that continues to gain momentum, especially among the baby boomers. Group As a Group we are continuing to increase the level of co-operation and the exchange of ideas across our businesses. The Group’s asset management businesses are using their global presence, exchanging information to support their investment decisions and to enable the efficient management of over £6 billion of cross-border money. In our insurance businesses, which remain predominantly market specific, collaboration is taking place where there is a commercial benefit. Product development teams are working across the Group to access existing skills and expertise. In distribution, the UK business has utilised the very successful techniques developed by Jackson in the US, to segment the independent financial adviser market, saving time and cost and improving returns. Work is ongoing to consolidate our technology infrastructure in particular across the UK and the US. A single Customer Service Desktop is now under development and will be launched in 2007. Central to the management of the Group is capital efficiency and capital allocation. During 2006, we have made significant progress in the assessment of, and management of, risk on a Group-wide basis. This understanding provides a solid foundation as we continue to embed decision making on a risk-adjusted basis. Summary The Group goes into 2007 with strong momentum. I continue to see tremendous scope for the Group to build sustainable profitable growth and secure superior growth in value for our shareholders. (*Previously announced UK cost savings target of £150 million by 2009 included £35 million in relation to Egg, which was acquired by Citi in January 2007. Previously announced restructuring costs of £110 million included £25 million related to Egg.) Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 9 Directors’ report: Overview Value G r o Momentum w t h O pportu nit y M&G United States Asia Powerful positions in all key asset classes Creating value through innovation A comprehensive understanding of the long-term value drivers M&G launched the UK's first unit trust in 1931 and today manages £164 billion on behalf of its investors. M&G has scale in all key asset classes: it is one of the largest active managers in the UK stock market, one of the largest bond investors in the UK and one of the UK’s largest property investors. Jackson leverages its low-cost, flexible technology platform to manufacture innovative and customisable products that can be brought to the market quickly and efficiently. In 2006, 81 per cent of Jackson’s retail sales were from products and features developed and launched in the current and previous year. Jackson also has a statutory general expense to asset ratio that is significantly lower than its top 25 individual annuity peer competitors. Prudential actively manages its product portfolio in Asia to optimise returns on capital. It has a relatively high proportion of capital-efficient unit-linked products – 64 per cent in 2006 – and this, combined with higher relative proportions of regular premium policies and Accident and Health riders, has enabled the business to achieve strong new business profit margins as a percentage of weighted sales. We continue to maintain a relentless focus on profitability and value, concentrating resources where we can generate the best returns for shareholders 10 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Directors’ report: Overview United Kingdom Maximising profitable growth Prudential has pursued a strategy focusing on those areas where it has competitive advantage, targeting capital-efficient returns through selective participation within its chosen markets, Retirement Income, Wealth and Health and Wholesale. As a result, margin increased in 2006 to 30 per cent and the overall internal rate of return (IRR) increased to 15 per cent. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 11 Directors’ report: Overview Value G r o Momentum w t h O pportu nit y United Kingdom M&G United States Fast growth in health insurance and equity release Rapid sales growth and expansion into new markets Record variable annuity sales growth PruHealth celebrated its second anniversary in 2006 and already covers around 100,000 customers. At the heart of PruHealth lies a totally new approach to private medical insurance that recognises that the healthier people are, the less likely they are to need medical treatment. Prudential UK is also looking to grow the equity release business it started in 2006, having written over £100 million of new business in its first year. In the retail marketplace, M&G delivered record fund inflows in 2006 with gross fund inflows increasing by 75 per cent to £6.7 billion and net fund inflows more than doubling to £3.1 billion. Product innovation has remained key for opening up new markets for M&G and 66 per cent of gross mutual fund inflows in 2006 through UK and European distribution channels were into funds launched or re-engineered within the past six years. Jackson delivered record variable annuity sales in 2006 of £3.8 billion, up 48 per cent on the previous year. This reflects its distinct competitive advantages: an innovative product offering; an efficient and flexible technology platform; a relationship- driven distribution model; and award-winning service. Jackson increased its variable annuity market share to 4.6 per cent in 2006, and maintained its ranking of twelfth in total variable annuity sales. Our strong positions in the markets in which we operate mean we are well placed to capture an increasing share of profitable growth in each 12 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Directors’ report: Overview Asia Consistent outperformance in headline growth Life new business has grown at a CAGR of 22 per cent over the last five years and funds under management at a CAGR of 25 per cent. In 2006, Prudential’s funds under management ranking against international fund managers in Asia increased from fourth to second. The bottom line is also growing, strongly reflecting our increasing scale and efficiency. On a like-for-like basis operating IFRS profits for the life business were up 11 per cent and for the funds business up 85 per cent. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 13 Directors’ report: Overview Value G r o Momentum w t h O pportu nit y Asia United Kingdom M&G Well placed to leverage proven platform for long-term profitable growth Prudential Corporation Asia has a productive, scale agency force, strong partnerships, innovative products and a respected brand. Going forward, Prudential will also be exploring new initiatives in the retirement space, developing more direct distribution, launching new health products and implementing a disciplined and systematic cross-sell and up-sell programme with its over seven million existing customers. Significant opportunities in retirement savings and income A fast-growing industry and increasingly accessible markets Prudential is strongly positioned to benefit from the predicted growth in the UK retirement savings and income markets, driven by increasing longevity and the number of baby boomers heading towards retirement over the next few years. Prudential will also be looking to maximise value from the steadily increasing flow of vestings from its mature pensions book over the coming years. The asset management sector continues to benefit from the increasing shift by retail investors from opaque to transparent investment products, such as unit trusts, and M&G’s range of market-leading funds has positioned it very strongly to benefit from this trend. European cross-border distribution has accelerated and the trend in favour of ‘Open Architecture’ in both the UK and Europe has continued to open up significant bank and life company distribution opportunities. As we look ahead, we see enormous opportunities in all three of our regions, and we feel confident we have the skills and resources to take advantage of them 14 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Directors’ report: Overview United States 78 million baby boomers reaching retirement In the US, the first members of the 78 million baby boomer generation turned 60 (the average retirement age) in 2006. The ageing demographics of the US are expected to increase annual retirement distributions from $0.5 trillion in 2004 to more than $1 trillion per year by 2012. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 15 Directors’ report: Overview Value G r o Momentum w t h O pportu nit y United States Asia United Kingdom Sustained increases in both sales and market share Asia becomes cash positive while delivering rapid growth Continued focus on core strengths to drive profitable growth Up to the end of 2006 Jackson experienced five consecutive years of variable annuity sales growth, 11 consecutive quarters of market share increases, and 17 consecutive quarters of variable annuity asset growth. Jackson has only experienced a quarterly decline in variable annuity assets five times since the first quarter of 1998. The Group’s position in Asia continues to develop rapidly with the region accounting for almost 50 per cent of the Group’s 2006 new business profits. As well as experiencing rapid growth, Asia has become cash positive in 2006, in line with our previous forecast, with a net remittance of £28 million to the Group. In 2007 and beyond, Asia offers significant potential for profitable growth and we are on track to deliver on our target to at least double 2005 new business profits by 2009. In 2006, Prudential UK’s retail business increased sales by 14 per cent and new business profits by 67 per cent. Going forward, Prudential UK will focus on its core strengths, including its longevity expertise and its multi-asset allocation capabilities, to drive profitable growth in the retirement income and savings markets. In addition, it will continue to safeguard embedded value in its mature life and pensions business, through targeted cost reduction programmes. The momentum we have built can be seen in the growth of our insurance and asset management businesses around the world 16 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Directors’ report: Overview M&G Significant and sustained profit growth M&G delivered significant profit growth during 2006 on the back of rising market levels, strong net inflows and continued business diversification. Operating profits, which include performance-related fees, increased 25 per cent to £204 million. Underlying profits were £177 million, an increase of 28 per cent compared to the previous year. Over the past four years, underlying profits have grown by 38 per cent per year. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 17 Operating and financial review Prudential plc is the Group holding company and the principal activity of its subsidiary undertakings is the provision of financial services in the UK, the US and Asia. Particulars of principal subsidiary undertakings are given in note I6 on page 236. This Operating and Financial Review (OFR) has been prepared in accordance with the Accounting Standards Board’s Reporting Statement 1 – OFR, a reporting statement of voluntary best practice. 19 Key performance indicators 22 Group overview 30 Business unit review: Insurance operations 30 United Kingdom 34 United States 37 Asia Asset management 42 Global 42 M&G 44 Asia Fund Management 45 PPM America Banking 46 Egg 47 Other corporate information 54 Risk management 67 Corporate responsibility review 18 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Directors’ report: Operating and financial review Key performance indicators Key performance indicators The Group’s strategy is centred on optimising Prudential’s competitive advantages in life assurance, becoming a leading provider of financial services for the retirement market, and on the further development of the asset management businesses. In implementing this strategy Prudential’s clear aim is to secure superior growth in value for its shareholders. The following metrics represent the financial key performance indicators (KPIs) the directors use to judge the delivery of strategies and the management of the businesses: New business premiums, calculated on an Annual Premium Equivalents (APE) basis and on a Present Value of New Business Premiums (PVNBP) basis; European Embedded Value (EEV) basis new business profits; Internal rate of return (IRR) on new business; External funds under management (FUM); Holding company cash flow; EEV basis operating profit based on longer-term investment returns on long-term business and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) basis operating profit based on longer-term investment returns. New business premiums and new business profit Prudential’s focus is on value not volume, growing sales in areas that deliver the most profitable returns. In 2006 the Group grew weighted insurance sales, calculated on an APE basis, by 16 per cent and increased new business profits by 20 per cent compared to 2005 on a constant exchange rate (CER) basis. In line with the Group’s strategy to continue to deliver strong sustainable profitable sales growth, Prudential is well positioned in markets that offer highly attractive opportunities for strong organic growth over the next 10 years, and it is broadening its customer proposition and product range. APE new business premiums £m 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 2,470 2,134 1,854 2004 2005 2006 PVNBP £m 20,000 15,000 16,860 18,947 10,000 5,000 0 2005 2006 EEV basis new business profits £m 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 200 0 1,039 869 753 2004 2005 2006 Definition: APE new business premiums New business premiums reflect premiums attaching to covered business and premiums for contracts classified as investment products or other financial instruments under IFRS. New business premiums, on an APE basis, are calculated as the aggregate of regular new business contributions (shown on an annualised basis) plus 10 per cent single new business contributions. 2004 and 2005 comparatives are shown on a CER basis. Definition: PVNBP New business premiums, on a PVNBP basis, are calculated as equalling single premiums plus the present value of expected new business premiums of regular premium business, allowing for lapses and other assumptions made in determining the EEV basis new business profit. 2005 comparative is shown on a CER basis. Definition: EEV basis new business profits The present pre-tax value of future shareholder cash flows from new business, less a deduction for the cost of locked-in (encumbered) capital and the impact of the time value of options and guarantees. 2004 and 2005 comparatives are shown on a CER basis. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 19 Directors’ report: Operating and financial review Key performance indicators Key performance indicators continued Internal rate of return on new business Improving capital efficiency is at the heart of Prudential’s commitment to deliver superior growth in value for its shareholders. Prudential continually works to enhance the effectiveness of its capital management processes, to ensure that investment and capital allocation decisions are focused on those areas of activity that will generate the best returns to shareholders. IRR on new business % 25 20 15 10 5 0 >20 >20 18 14 15 15 2005 2006 2005 2006 2005 2006 UK US Asia Definition: Internal rate of return on new business The internal rate of return is equivalent to the discount rate at which the present value of the post-tax cash flows expected to be earned over the lifetime of the business written in shareholder-backed life funds is equal to the total invested capital to support the writing of the business. The capital included in the calculation of the IRR is equal to the amount required to pay acquisition costs and set up statutory reserves less premiums received, plus encumbered capital. The impact of the time value of options and guarantees is included in the calculation. External funds under management Prudential’s focus is to grow external funds under management and deliver sustained profitable growth from its asset management businesses. In 2006 external FUM grew by 26 per cent on 2005 (CER basis). This growth has been achieved through expanding into new markets and broadening the Group’s product range, and leveraging cross regional collaboration all underpinned by excellent investment performance. The fundamentals are in place to sustain this growth in the future. Definition: External funds under management External funds under management represent the value of the total investment products managed by the M&G and Asia asset management businesses, as published in the Group’s Interim and Annual Reports. 2004 and 2005 comparatives are shown on a CER basis. External funds under management £bn 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 57.2 45.4 37.0 2004 2005 2006 Holding company cash flow Prudential aims to generate cash for the Group without constraining the value opportunities in its businesses. The Group had a net cash outflow of £104 million in 2006, an improvement of 65 per cent on the prior year; and Asia became cash flow positive demonstrating the success of the regional business as a whole and the growing scale of the in-force books of newer markets. The Group is confident it has the capital and cash resources to fund its planned future organic growth. In 2007 the Group cash flow is expected to be positive including the cash proceeds from the sale of Egg. At an operational level the cash outflow is expected to be greater than in 2006, given the benefit this year of the regulatory change to the Financial Services Authority (FSA) reserving requirements in the UK. Taking into account plans for future growth, and a normalised level of scrip dividend it is expected that the operating cash flow will be positive in 2008. Definition: Holding company cash flow The increase or decrease in holding company cash during the reporting period. Holding company cash flow £m 800 600 400 200 0 -200 -400 -600 -800 -1,000 2004 2005 2006 20 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 ■ Total cash remitted to Group ■ Interest and dividends ■ Tax and corporate activities ■ Capital invested in business units –– (Decrease)/increase in cash Directors’ report: Operating and financial review Key performance indicators EEV basis operating profit based on longer-term investment returns on long-term business and IFRS basis operating profit based on longer-term investment returns Prudential’s objective is to achieve superior growth in value for its shareholders. This is shown by sustainable growth in operating profit, both on an EEV and IFRS basis. In 2006 the Group delivered a 28 per cent increase on 2005 (CER basis) in EEV operating profit on its long-term business. Prudential’s objective is to focus on its strengths and exploit opportunities in the local markets in which it operates. Prudential’s strategy of leveraging its knowledge and expertise across product development, distribution and administration, is designed to allow it to continue to deliver operating profit growth in the future. Total IFRS operating profit was seven per cent lower in 2006 than 2005 due to the losses in Egg during the year. However, excluding Egg, IFRS operating profit was up 14 per cent on 2005 (CER basis) reflecting the strong performance of the Group’s insurance and fund management businesses. EEV basis operating profit based on longer-term investment returns on long-term business £m 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 2,209 1,722 1,343 2004 2005 2006 IFRS basis operating profit based on longer-term investment returns £m 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 200 0 958 893 702 2004 2005 2006 Definition: EEV basis operating profit based on longer-term investment returns on long-term business The change in pre-tax value of EEV as a result of new business, expected investment returns and the unwind of the discount rate, the effect of changes in operating assumptions and any operating experience variances. It excludes the effect of short-term fluctuations in investment returns against the long-term assumptions, the effect of changes in economic assumptions, actuarial gains and losses on defined benefit pension schemes, the mark to market value movements on borrowings and goodwill impairment charges. 2004 and 2005 comparatives are shown on a CER basis. Definition: IFRS basis operating profit based on longer-term investment returns These profits exclude goodwill impairment charges, short-term fluctuations in investment returns and the shareholders’ share of actuarial and other gains and losses on defined benefit pension schemes. 2004 and 2005 comparatives are shown on a CER basis. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 21 Directors’ report: Operating and financial review Group overview Group overview Results highlights Annual premium equivalent (APE) sales1 Present value of new business premiums (PVNBP)1 Net investment flows External funds under management New business profit (NBP)1 NBP Margin (% APE)1 NBP Margin (% PVNBP)1 EEV basis operating profit from long-term business from continuing operations2, 3 Total EEV basis operating profit from continuing operations3 Total IFRS operating profit from continuing operations3 EEV basis shareholders’ funds (£bn) IFRS shareholders’ funds (£bn) Holding company cash flow CER RER4 2006 £m 2005 £m Percentage change 2005 £m Percentage change 2,470 18,947 8,633 57,199 1,039 42% 5.5% 2,209 1,976 893 11,883 5,488 (104) 2,134 16,860 5,183 45,378 869 41% 5.2% 1,722 1,711 958 9,991 4,986 (298) 16% 12% 67% 26% 20% 28% 15% (7)% 19% 10% 65% 2,138 16,892 5,189 46,329 867 41% 5.1% 1,723 1,712 957 10,301 5,194 (298) 16% 12% 66% 23% 20% 28% 15% (7)% 15% 6% 65% (1) The details shown include the effect of the bulk annuity transfer from the Scottish Amicable Insurance Fund (SAIF) to Prudential Retirement Limited, a shareholder-owned subsidiary of the Group. SAIF is a closed ring-fenced sub-fund of the PAC long-term fund established by a court approved scheme of arrangement in September 1997, whose results are solely for the benefit of SAIF policyholders. (2) Long-term business profits after deducting Asia development expenses and before restructuring costs. (3) Based on longer-term investment returns from continuing operations. Operating profit is stated excluding the effect of short-term fluctuations in investment returns against the long-term assumptions, the effect of changes in economic assumptions, actuarial gains and losses on defined benefit pension schemes, the mark to market value movements on borrowings and goodwill impairment charges. (4) Reported exchange rate (RER). In the Operating and Financial Review (OFR), year-on-year comparisons of financial performance are on a constant exchange rate (CER) basis, unless otherwise stated. The Group has delivered a strong set of results for 2006 as illustrated in the table above. The Group delivered record total APE sales of £2,470 million (2005: £2,134 million) and for the first time generated NBP in excess of £1 billion. This, together with the significant increase in contributions from the in-force business, drove a record EEV basis operating profit from the long-term business to £2.2 billion. The following year-on-year comparisons are presented on a RER basis. The EEV basis result before tax and minority interests was a profit of £3,072 million up 37 per cent on 2005. Within this, short-term fluctuations in investment return were £745 million (2005: £1,068 million), mainly driven by positive variances in the UK (£378 million) and Asia (£286 million). Changes in economic assumptions were negative £1 million (2005: negative £349 million). They include a positive change in the UK (£182 million), a negative change in the US (£51 million), and a negative change in Asia (£132 million). EEV basis shareholders’ funds were £11.9 billion (2005: £10.3 billion), an increase of £1.6 billion over last year, driven by a strong operating performance from all insurance and asset management business units. Earnings per share, based on EEV operating profit after tax and related minority interests, were 57.6 pence, compared with 56.6 pence in 2005. On an IFRS basis, operating profits (before tax) were £893 million (2005: £957 million), down seven per cent on last year principally due to the £145 million loss incurred by Egg. The Group delivered strong growth of 66 per cent in total net investment flows from its asset management businesses of £8.6 billion (2005: £5.2 billion). This performance contributed to the growth in total external investment funds under management that grew from £46.3 billion in 2005 to £57.2 billion in 2006. Earnings per share, based on total IFRS operating profit after tax and minority interests, were 26.4 pence compared with 32.2 pence in 2005. Holding company cash flow improved significantly from a cash outflow of £298 million in 2005 to a cash outflow of £104 million in 2006, reflecting higher capital remittances, and lower capital invested in the UK reflecting the benefit from a change in the Financial Services Authority (FSA) reserving regulations. The capital position of Prudential plc, measured under the Financial Conglomerate Directive (FCD) basis, will be submitted to the FSA by 30 April 2007 but is currently estimated to be in the region of £1.0 billion. 22 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Directors’ report: Operating and financial review Group overview The total capital invested by the Group to support new business sales, in terms of both initial strain and required capital, was £554 million in 2006. This represents £22.4 million per £100 million sales in terms of APE and £2.9 million per £100 million in terms of PVNBP sales. On 29 January 2007 Prudential announced that it had entered into a binding agreement to sell Egg to Citi for a consideration of £575 million, subject to adjustment to reflect any change in net asset value between 31 December 2006 and completion. Impact of currency movements Prudential has a diverse international mix of businesses with a significant proportion of its profit generated outside the UK. In 2006, 74 per cent of NBP and 67 per cent of IFRS operating profit was delivered from overseas operations. In preparing the Group’s consolidated accounts, results of overseas operations are converted at rates of exchange based on the average of the year, whilst shareholders’ funds are converted at year end rates of exchange. Changes in exchange rates from year to year have an impact on the Group’s results when these are converted into pounds sterling for reporting purposes. In some cases these exchange rate fluctuations can mask underlying business performance. Consequently, the Board has for a number of years reviewed the Group’s international performance on a CER basis. This basis eliminates the impact from conversion, the effects of which do not alter the long-term value of shareholders’ interests in Prudential’s non-UK businesses. Basis of preparation of results The European Union (EU) requires that all listed European groups prepare their financial statements in accordance with EU approved IFRS. Since 1 January 2005, Prudential has been reporting its primary results on an IFRS basis and 2006 represents the second year end of financial statements prepared under IFRS for the Group. In addition, as a signatory to the European Chief Financial Officers’ (CFO) Forum’s EEV Principles, Prudential has also been reporting supplementary results on an EEV basis for the Group’s long-term business since 2005. These results are combined with the IFRS basis results of the Group’s other businesses to provide a supplementary operating profit under EEV. Reference to operating profit relates to profit based on longer-term investment returns that excludes goodwill impairment charges, short-term fluctuations in investment returns, the mark to market movement on core borrowings, the shareholders’ share of actuarial and other gains and losses on defined benefit pension schemes, the effect of changes in economic assumptions and changes in the time value of options and guarantees caused by economic factors. will generally differ from the cash flow pattern. Over the life of a contract, however, aggregate IFRS profits will be the same as aggregate cash flow. In preparing its IFRS basis results the Group continues to provide supplementary analysis of the profit before shareholder tax so as to distinguish operating results based on longer-term investment returns, actuarial gains and losses on defined benefit pension schemes, and exceptional items. Life insurance products are, by their nature, long term and the profit on this business is generated over a significant number of years. Accounting under IFRS does not, in Prudential’s opinion, properly reflect the inherent value of these future profit streams. Prudential believes that embedded value reporting provides investors with a better measure of underlying profitability of the Group’s long-term businesses and is a valuable supplement to statutory accounts. Sales and funds under management Prudential delivered strong sales growth during 2006 with total new insurance sales up 11 per cent to £15.1 billion at CER. This resulted in record insurance sales of £2.5 billion on the APE basis, an increase of 16 per cent on 2005. At RER, APE was up 16 per cent on 2005. Strong growth came from the US, with APE up on 2005 by 21 per cent, and in Asia with APE up 30 per cent at CER. Sales under the PVNBP basis in 2006 increased by 12 per cent to £19 billion at CER. Total gross investment sales for 2006 were £33.9 billion, up 31 per cent on 2005 at CER. Net investment flows of £8.6 billion were up 67 per cent on last year at CER. Total external funds under management in 2006 increased by 23 per cent from £46.3 billion in 2005 to £57.2 billion at RER, reflecting net investment flows of £8.6 billion, and net market and other movements of £2.2 billion. At 31 December 2006, total insurance and investment funds under management were £251 billion, an increase of seven per cent from 2005 at RER. EEV basis operating profit from continuing operations Total EEV basis operating profit from continuing operations based on longer-term investment returns was £1,976 million, up 15 per cent from 2005 at CER. At RER, the result was up 15 per cent. This result reflects profitable growth in the insurance and funds management businesses. Prudential’s insurance businesses achieved significant growth, both in terms of NBP and in-force profit, resulting in a 28 per cent increase in operating profit over 2005 at CER. In broad terms, IFRS profits for long-term business contracts reflect the aggregate of statutory transfers from with-profits funds and profits on a traditional accounting basis for other long-term business. Although the statutory transfers from with-profits funds are closely aligned with cash flow generation, the pattern of IFRS profits over time from shareholder-backed long-term businesses In 2006, the Group generated record NBP from insurance business of £1,039 million, which was 20 per cent above 2005 at CER, driven by strong sales momentum in the US and Asia, achieved without compromising margins. At RER, NBP was up 20 per cent. The average Group NBP margin was 42 per cent (2005: 41 per cent) on an APE basis and 5.5 per cent Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 23 Directors’ report: Operating and financial review Group overview Group overview continued EEV basis operating profit on continuing operations Insurance business: UK US Asia Long-term business Development expenses Fund management business: M&G US broker-dealer and fund management Curian Asia fund management Banking: Egg Other income and expenditure 2006 £m 686 708 829 CER RER 2005 £m Percentage change 2005 £m Percentage change 426 731 585 61% (3)% 42% 28% 426 741 576 1,743 61% (4)% 44% 28% 2,223 1,742 (15) (20) (175)% (20) (75)% 204 18 (8) 50 264 163 24 (10) 11 188 25% (25)% 20% 355% 40% 163 24 (10) 12 189 25% (25)% 20% 317% 40% (145) (298) 44 (243) (430)% (23)% 44 (244) (430)% (22)% Total EEV basis operating profit on continuing operations 2,029 1,711 19% 1,712 19% Restructuring costs (53) 0 0 Total EEV basis operating profit on continuing operations after restructuring costs 1,976 1,711 15% 1,712 15% (2005: 5.2 per cent at CER) on a PVNBP basis. The overall margin has increased mainly driven by profitable sales of individual annuities in the UK and of variable annuities in the US. In-force profit increased 36 per cent on 2005 at CER to £1,184 million. At RER, in-force profit was up 35 per cent. In aggregate, net assumption changes were £38 million positive, and experience variances and other items were £111 million positive. The in-force profit in 2005 included a £148 million charge in respect of a persistency assumption change in the UK, and a credit in the US of £140 million reflecting an operating assumption change following price increases introduced on two blocks of in-force term life business. Asia’s development expenses (excluding the regional head office expenses) were £15 million, (2005: £20 million at CER). Results from the fund management business were £264 million (2005: £188 million), up 40 per cent on 2005 at CER. Egg losses were £145 million (2005: profit £44 million). Other income and expenditure totalled a net expense of £298 million compared with £244 million in 2005 at RER. This result includes £36 million of costs for the Asia head office costs (2005: £30 million); £83 million for the Group head office costs (2005: £70 million); net interest expense on central borrowings of negative £169 million (2005: £133 million); and a charge for share-based payments for Prudential schemes of £10 million (2005: £11 million). Total EEV basis operating profit includes £53 million in restructuring costs (nil in 2005), primarily related to the costs associated with the UK and Egg cost saving initiatives announced in July 2006. EEV basis profit before tax and minority interests from continuing operations Total EEV basis operating profit on continuing operations after restructuring costs 1,976 1,712 2006 £m RER 2005 £m Short-term fluctuations in investment returns: UK US Asia Other Actuarial gains and losses on defined benefit pension schemes Effect of change in economic assumptions: UK US Asia Effect of change in time value of cost of options and guarantees: UK US Asia Movement in mark to market value of core borrowings: US Other Goodwill impairment charge Profit from continuing operations before tax 745 378 64 286 17 207 (1) 182 (51) (132) 60 40 6 14 85 3 82 0 1,068 994 67 41 (34) (47) (349) (81) (3) (265) 47 31 11 5 (67) (2) (65) (120) 3,072 2,244 24 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Directors’ report: Operating and financial review Group overview The following year-on-year comparisons are presented on a RER basis. The EEV basis result before tax and minority interests was a profit of £3,072 million up 37 per cent on 2005. This reflects in part an increase in operating profit from £1,712 million in 2005 to £1,976 million in 2006. The profit before tax also includes £745 million in short-term fluctuations in investment returns (2005: £1,068 million), negative changes in economic assumptions of £1 million (2005: negative £349 million) and the effect of change in time value of options and guarantees of positive £60 million (2005: positive £47 million). The UK long-term business component of short-term fluctuations in investment returns of £378 million (2005: £994 million) primarily reflects the difference between the actual investment return for the with-profits life fund of 12.4 per cent (2005: 20 per cent) and the long-term assumed return of 7.5 per cent. The US short-term fluctuations in investment returns of £64 million primarily include a positive £46 million in respect of the difference between actual investment returns and long-term returns included in operating profit in respect of fixed income securities, related swap transactions and equity-based investments. It also includes a positive £17 million in relation to changed expectations of future profitability on variable annuity business in force due to the actual variable annuity investment account (‘separate account’) return exceeding the long-term return reported within operating profit, offset by the impact of the associated hedging position. In Asia, long-term business short-term investment fluctuations were £286 million, compared to £41 million last year. This reflects strong market performance across the region particularly in Vietnam, Hong Kong, Singapore and Taiwan. An actuarial gain on the defined benefit pension schemes was recorded in 2006 for £207 million (2005: loss £47 million). This gain primarily represents the difference between actual and expected investment returns for the schemes and the reduction in liabilities due to an increase in the risk discount rate resulting from increases in corporate bond returns. Negative economic assumption changes of £1 million in 2006 compared with negative economic assumption changes of £349 million in 2005. Economic assumption changes in 2006 comprised positive £182 million in the UK, negative £51 million in the US and negative £132 million in Asia. In the UK, economic assumption changes of positive £182 million reflect the impact of the increase in the future investment return assumption offset by the increase in the risk discount rate. In the US, economic assumption changes of negative £51 million primarily reflect increases in the risk discount rates following an increase in the US 10-year Treasury rate, partially offset by an increase in the separate account return assumption. In Asia, negative economic assumption changes were £132 million, of which £101 million is due to Taiwan. This primarily reflects the effect of delaying for a further year Prudential’s assumption of a gradual rise in interest rates. The economic scenarios used to calculate 2006 EEV basis results reflect the assumption of a phased progression of the bond yields from the current rates to the long- term expected rates. The projections assume that, in the average scenario, the current bond yields of around 2 per cent trend towards 5.5 per cent at 31 December 2013. Allowance is made for the mix of assets in the fund, the future investment strategy and the market value depreciation of the bonds as a result of the assumed yield increases. This gives rise to an average assumed fund earned rate that trends from 2.1 per cent to 5.7 per cent in 2014. The assumed fund earned rate falls to 1.4 per cent in 2007 and remains below 2.1 per cent for a further five years due to the depreciation of bond values as yields rise. Thereafter, the fund earned rate fluctuates around a target of 5.9 per cent. For the 2005 results the grading of bond yields, in the average scenario, was around 2 per cent towards 5.5 per cent at 31 December 2012. Consistent with the Group’s EEV methodology, a constant discount rate has been applied to the projected cash flows. The change in the time value of cost of options and guarantees was positive £60 million for the year (2005: positive £47 million), consisting of £40 million, £6 million and £14 million for the UK, the US and Asia, respectively. The mark to market movement on core borrowings (excluding Egg) was a positive £85 million (2005: negative £67 million) reflecting the reduction in fair value of core borrowings due to increases in interest rates. EEV basis profit after tax and minority interests Profit from continuing operations before tax Tax Profit from continuing operations for the financial year after tax before minority interests Discontinued operations (net of tax) Minority interests 2006 £m RER 2005 £m 3,072 2,244 (859) (653) 2,213 1,591 0 (1) 3 (12) Profit for the year attributable to equity holders of the Company 2,212 1,582 The following year-on-year comparisons are presented on a RER basis. Profit after tax and minority interests was £2,212 million (2005: £1,582 million). The tax charge of £859 million compares with a tax charge of £653 million in 2005. Minority interests in the Group results were £1 million (2005: £12 million). The effective tax rate at an operating tax level was 30 per cent (2005: 21 per cent), generally reflecting expected tax rates. The effective tax rate in 2005 was unusually low due to a number of factors, including favourable settlements reached with the tax authorities, and being able to take credit for Egg’s French losses. The effective tax rate at a total EEV level was 28 per cent (2005: 29 per cent) on a profit of £3,072 million. The higher rate of effective tax at a total level for 2005 was primarily due to the effect of impairment of goodwill (which does not attract tax relief) and the impact of short-term fluctuations and changes in economic assumptions not all of which are tax affected. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 25 Directors’ report: Operating and financial review Group overview Group overview continued Return on embedded value Prudential’s return on embedded value for 2006 was 13.5 per cent (2005: 15.5 per cent). This reduction is due to an increase in the opening shareholders’ funds at 1 January 2006, mainly affected by the UK short-term investment fluctuations in 2005, which was higher than the corresponding growth in after-tax operating profit. The return is based on EEV operating profit from continuing operations after tax and minority interests as a percentage of opening embedded value (shareholders’ funds on a EEV basis). IFRS basis operating profit (based on longer-term investment returns) Group operating profit before tax from continuing operations on the IFRS basis after restructuring costs was £893 million, a reduction of seven per cent on 2005 at CER. This figure includes £50 million of restructuring costs. Group operating profit before tax from continuing operations before restructuring costs was £943 million, a reduction of two per cent on 2005 at CER. This reduction is mainly caused by the loss of £145 million in Egg (2005: £44 million profit). At RER, operating profit before restructuring costs was down one per cent on the prior year. In the UK, IFRS operating profit for the long-term business increased 25 per cent to £500 million in 2006. This primarily reflected a 22 per cent increase in profits attributable to the with-profits business, a consequence of bonus declarations announced in February 2006 and 2007 and a benefit of £46 million from a change in reserving requirements. This was due to the FSA’s relaxation of reserving requirements under the policy statement that effected the proposal in CP 06/16. The result of £500 million excludes restructuring costs of £31 million in respect of implementation costs associated with Prudential UK and Egg cost saving initiatives announced in July 2006. In the US, total IFRS operating profit of £408 million was up 14 per cent on 2005 at CER. IFRS operating profit for long-term business was £398 million, up 16 per cent from £344 million in 2005 at CER. The US operations’ results are based on US GAAP, adjusted where necessary to comply with IFRS as the Group’s basis of presenting operating profit is based on longer-term investment returns. In determining the operating profit for US operations, longer-term returns for fixed income securities incorporate a risk margin reserve (RMR) charge for longer-term defaults and amortisation of interest-related realised gains and losses. The growth in Jackson’s IFRS operating profit mainly reflects increased fee and spread income. The fee income was driven by a 51 per cent increase in separate account assets held at year end, and improved returns on these assets. One-off items affecting the spread-based income were £33 million (2005: £44 million), net of DAC amortisation. The operating profit from non-long-term business was £10 million, a reduction on 2005 (2005: £14 million). The 2005 result, however, benefited from a one-off £5 million revaluation of an investment vehicle managed by PPM America (PPMA). Curian recorded losses of £8 million in 2006, down from £10 million in 2005, as the business continues to build scale. Asia’s operating profit for long-term business before development expenses of £15 million was £189 million, a six per cent decrease on 2005 at CER. However, this result was 11 per cent above prior year excluding a net positive £30 million contribution from exceptional items in 2005. Operating profit continues to be driven mainly by the established markets of Singapore, Malaysia and Hong Kong which represent £139 million of the total operating profit in 2006. There was an increased contribution from Indonesia and Vietnam as these operations continue to build scale. Four life IFRS basis operating profit based on longer-term investment returns Insurance business: UK US Asia Long-term business Development expenses Fund management business: M&G US broker-dealer and fund management Curian Asia fund management Banking: Egg Other income and expenditure Total IFRS basis operating profit based on longer-term investment returns Restructuring costs 2006 £m 500 398 189 1,087 CER RER 2005 £m Percentage change 2005 £m Percentage change 400 344 201 945 25% 16% (6)% 15% 400 348 195 943 25% 14% (3)% 15% (15) (20) (25)% (20) (25)% 204 18 (8) 50 264 (145) (248) 943 (50) 25% (25)% 20% 355% 40% (430)% (25)% (2)% 163 24 (10) 11 188 44 (198) 959 0 25% (25)% 20% 317% 40% (430)% (25)% (1)% 163 24 (10) 12 189 44 (199) 957 0 Total IFRS basis operating profit based on longer-term investment returns after restructuring costs 893 959 (7)% 957 (7)% 26 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Directors’ report: Operating and financial review Group overview operations made IFRS losses: China, India and Korea which are relatively new businesses rapidly building scale and Thailand which is marginally loss making. Within the net positive £30 million of exceptional items in 2005 there was a write-off of deferred acquisition costs (DAC) in Taiwan of £21 million. No write-off was required in 2006. The profits and recoverability of DAC in Taiwan are dependent on the rates of return earned and assumed to be earned on the assets held to cover liabilities and on future investment income and contract cash flows for traditional whole of life policies. If interest rates were to remain at current levels in 2007 the premium reserve, net of DAC, would be broadly sufficient. If interest rates were to remain at current levels in 2008 then some level of write-off of DAC may be necessary. However, the amount of the charge currently estimated to be £70-90 million is sensitive to the above mentioned variables. The Asian fund management operations reported an 85 per cent growth in operating profits to £50 million (2005: £11 million), excluding negative £16 million of exceptional items recorded in 2005, driven by strong contributions from the established markets of Singapore and Hong Kong. IFRS basis profit before tax from continuing operations Operating profit from continuing operations based on longer-term investment returns after restructuring costs Goodwill impairment charge Short-term fluctuations in investment returns Shareholders’ share of actuarial and other gains 2006 £m 893 0 162 RER 2005 £m 957 (120) 211 The following year-on-year comparisons are presented on a RER basis. Profit after tax and minority interests was £874 million compared with £748 million in 2005. The effective rate of tax on operating profits, based on longer-term investment returns, was 29 per cent (2005: 19 per cent). The effective rate of tax at the total IFRS profit level for continuing operations for 2006 was 28 per cent (2005: 24 per cent). The effective tax rate in 2006 was close to the expected tax rate of 31 per cent (which reflects the geographic split of profits). The effective tax rate in 2005 was unusually low due to a number of factors, including favourable settlements reached with the revenue authorities, and being able to take credit for Egg’s losses in France. Earnings per share Earnings per share, based on EEV basis operating profit from continuing operations after tax and related minority interests, were 57.6 pence, compared with 56.6 pence in 2005. Earnings per share, based on IFRS operating profit from continuing operations after tax and related minority interests, were 26.4 pence, compared with 32.2 pence in 2005. Basic earnings per share, based on total EEV basis profit after minority interests, were 91.7 pence, compared with 66.9 pence in 2005. Basic earnings per share, based on IFRS profit after minority interests, were 36.2 pence, compared with 31.6 pence in 2005. Dividend per share and losses on defined benefit pension schemes 167 (50) Profit before tax from continuing operations attributable to shareholders 1,222 998 The Board has reviewed its longer-term dividend policy in light of its expectation that the overall operating cash flow of the Group will be positive from 2008. The following year-on-year comparisons are presented on a RER basis. Total IFRS basis profits before tax and minority interests were £1,222 million in 2006, compared with £998 million for 2005. The increase reflects: a reduction in operating profit of £64 million; a decrease in short-term fluctuations in investment return, down £49 million from 2005; and a £217 million positive movement from the prior year in actuarial gains and losses attributable to shareholder-backed operations in respect of the Group’s defined benefit pension schemes. In addition, in 2006 there is no goodwill impairment charge (2005: £120 million). IFRS basis profit after tax Profit before tax from continuing operations 1,222 2006 £m RER 2005 £m 998 Tax Profit from continuing operations for the financial year after tax Discontinued operations (net of tax) Minority interests (347) (241) 875 0 (1) 757 3 (12) Profit for the year attributable to equity holders of the Company 874 748 The directors recommend a final dividend for 2006 of 11.72 pence per share payable on 22 May 2007 to shareholders on the register at the close of business on 13 April 2007. The interim dividend for 2006 was 5.42 pence per share. The total dividend for the year, including the interim dividend and the recommended final dividend, amounts to 17.14 pence per share compared with 16.32 pence per share for 2005, an increase of five per cent. The total cost of dividends in respect of 2006 was £418 million. The full-year dividend is covered 1.5 times by post-tax IFRS operating profit from continuing operations. Dividend cover is calculated as operating profit after tax on an IFRS basis, divided by the current year interim dividend plus the proposed final dividend. The Board will focus on delivering a growing dividend, which will continue to be determined after taking into account the Group’s financial flexibility and opportunities to invest in areas of the business offering attractive returns. The Board believes that in the medium term a dividend cover of around two times is appropriate. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 27 Directors’ report: Operating and financial review Group overview Group overview continued EEV basis shareholders’ funds £m Analysis of movement 2006 14,000 1,184 204 (145) 60 (366) 1,039 10.301 13,000 12,000 11,000 10,000 9,000 8,000 830 60 207 (1) (732) (359) (399) 11,883 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O A – 2006 opening shareholders’ funds B – Life new business profit C – Life in-force profit D – M&G E – Egg operating profit F – Other non-life operations G – Other income and expenditure (including Asia development expense and restructuring) H – Short-term fluctuations in investment returns I – Time value of cost of options and guarantees J – Actuarial Gains and losses on DB schemes K – Economic Assumption changes L – Tax, minority interest and others M – FX movements N – External dividends O – 2006 closing shareholders’ funds Shareholders’ funds On the EEV basis, which recognises the shareholders’ interest in long-term businesses, shareholders’ funds at 31 December 2006 were £11.9 billion, an increase of £1.6 billion from the 2005 year-end level (2005: £10.3 billion). This 15 per cent increase primarily reflects: total EEV basis operating profit of £1,976 million; a £745 million favourable movement in short-term fluctuations in investment returns; a £59 million positive movement due to changes in economic assumptions and in time value of options and guarantees; a positive movement on the mark to market of core debt of £85 million; the proceeds for the share capital issue of the parent company for £336 million, and a positive movement in the actuarial gains on the defined benefit pension schemes of £207 million. These were offset by: a tax charge of £859 million; the negative impact of £359 million for foreign exchange movements; the impact of the acquisition of the minority interest in Egg for £167 million, and dividend payments of £399 million made to shareholders. At year end 2006, the embedded value for the Asian long-term business was £2.5 billion. The established markets of Hong Kong, Singapore and Malaysia contribute £2.0 billion to the embedded value generated across the region with Korea (£191 million) and Vietnam (£198 million) making further substantial contributions. Prudential’s other markets of China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Thailand and the Philippines in aggregate contribute £336 million in embedded value. Growth in embedded value for the Asian business as a whole has been partially offset by a negative embedded value in Taiwan of £216 million. This is an improvement from the reported negative £311 million in 2005, which includes the *Economic capital is broadly considered to be the amount of capital a financial services firm’s own internal risk assessment determines it should hold to remain solvent following events that might be considered as unexpected, yet not so unlikely that they might never occur in practice. 28 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 associated cost of economic capital*, and reflects the impact of the low interest rate environment in Taiwan on the in-force business. The current mix of new business in Taiwan is weighted heavily towards unit-linked and protection products, representing 58 per cent and 17 per cent of new business APE in 2006, respectively. As a result, interest rates have little effect on new business profitability and a one per cent reduction in assumed interest rates would reduce new business margins in Taiwan by only two percentage points. However, the in-force book in Taiwan, predominantly made up of whole of life policies, has an embedded value that is sensitive to interest rate changes. A one per cent decrease in interest rates, along with consequential changes to assumed investment returns for all asset classes, market values of fixed interest assets and risk discount rates, would result in a £165 million decrease in Taiwan’s embedded value. A similar one per cent positive shift in interest rates would increase embedded value by £107 million. On the assumption that bond yields remained flat during 2007 and then trended towards 5.5 per cent in 2014 this would have reduced the 2006 Taiwan embedded value by £88 million. Sensitivity of the embedded value to interest rate changes varies considerably across the region. In aggregate, a one per cent decrease in interest rates, along with all consequential changes noted above, would result in a five per cent decrease to Asia’s embedded value. Statutory IFRS basis shareholders’ funds at 31 December 2006 were £5.5 billion. This compares with £5.2 billion at 31 December 2005. The increase primarily reflects: profit after tax and minority interests of £874 million, the proceeds from the share capital issue of the Company for £336 million, offset by the impact of the acquisition of Egg’s minority interests for £167 million, negative foreign exchange movements of £224 million, dividend payments to shareholders of £399 million, and the impact of unrealised holding losses on available-for-sale investments of £210 million. Directors’ report: Operating and financial review Group overview Holding company cash flow Cash remitted by business units: UK life fund transfer** UK other dividends (including special dividend) US Asia M&G Total cash remitted to Group Net interest paid Dividends paid Scrip dividends and share options Cash remittances after interest and dividends Tax received Corporate activities Cash flow before investment in businesses Capital invested in business units: UK Asia Total capital invested in business units Decrease in cash **In respect of current and prior year’s bonus declarations. 2006 £m 217 0 110 175 94 596 (128) (399) 91 160 122 (67) 215 (172) (147) (319) (104) 2005 £m 194 103 85 73 62 517 (115) (378) 55 79 107 (66) 120 (249) (169) (418) (298) The table above shows the Group holding company cash flow. Prudential believes that this format gives a clearer presentation of the use of the Group’s resources than the format of the statement required by IFRS. UK US Asia The Group holding company received £596 million in cash remittances from business units in 2006 (2005: £517 million) comprising the shareholders’ statutory life fund transfer of £217 million relating to the 2005 and 2006 bonus declarations from the UK, and remittances of £110 million, £175 million and £94 million from the US, Asia and M&G respectively. The last of three special dividends of £100 million was paid from the Prudential Assurance Company (PAC) shareholders’ funds in 2005 to the Group holding company in respect of profit arising from earlier business disposals. After net dividends and interest paid, there was a net cash inflow of £160 million (2005: £79 million). During 2006, the Group holding company paid £67 million in respect of corporate activities and received £122 million (2005: £107 million) in respect of Group relief on taxable losses. The Group invested £319 million (2005: £418 million) in its business units, comprising £172 million in the UK and £147 million in Asia. In 2006, Asia became a net contributor to the Group holding company cash flow for the first time, with a net remittance of £28 million. The capital investment in the UK was lower than planned reflecting a capital benefit from the FSA’s change of reserving requirements. Without this reserving change the UK would have required capital of approximately £230 million. In aggregate this gave rise to a decrease in cash of £104 million (2005: £298 million decrease). In 2007, the Group cash flow is expected to be positive including the cash proceeds from the sale of Egg. At an operational level the cash outflow is expected to be greater than in 2006, given the benefit this year of the regulatory change to the FSA reserving requirements in the UK. In 2007, the UK shareholders’ statutory transfer relating to the bonus declarations made in February 2006 and 2007 will be £261 million. Depending on the mix of business written and the opportunities available, cash invested to support the UK in 2007 is expected to be less than in 2006, up to £160 million and with the expectation that the UK shareholder-backed business will become cash positive in 2010. Taking into account plans for future growth, a normalised level of scrip dividend, the reducing UK capital requirement and increased remittances from the other life and asset management operations, it is expected that the operating cash flow of the Group holding company will be positive in 2008. New business capital usage 2006 Free surplus £m (221) (228) (105) (554) 2006 Required capital £m 176 196 11 383 2006 Net worth £m (45) (32) (94) (171) 2006 Value in force £m 231 200 467 898 The Group wrote £2,470 million of sales on an APE basis and £18,947 million on a PVNBP basis in 2006. In support of this amount of new business sales, the Group invested £554 million of capital. This amount covers both new business acquisition expenses, including commission, statutory reserves and the required capital, and amounts to approximately £22.4 million per £100 million of APE sales and £2.9 million per £100 million of sales on a PVNBP basis. In the UK, £221 million of capital was invested in 2006 to support APE sales of £900 million and PVNBP sales of £7,712 million. This amounts to approximately £24.6 million per £100 million of APE sales and £2.9 million per £100 million of sales on a PVNBP basis. In the US, £228 million of capital was invested in 2006 to support APE sales of £614 million and PVNBP sales of £6,103 million. This amounts to approximately £37.1 million per £100 million of APE sales and £3.7 million per £100 million of sales on a PVNBP basis. In Asia, £105 million of capital was invested in 2006 to support APE sales of £956 million and PVNBP sales of £5,132 million. This amounts to approximately £11 million per £100 million of APE sales and £2.0 million per £100 million of sales on a PVNBP basis. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 29 Directors’ report: Operating and financial review Business unit review: Insurance operations Business unit review Insurance operations United Kingdom 1. Market review and summary of strategy The UK retirement market continues to remain attractive with an ageing population driving demand for pre and post-retirement products. While many UK consumers remain overly indebted and are not saving enough for retirement, with a backdrop of reduced state and employer provision, they increasingly need to take control of their financial affairs. This positive demographic trend, together with an increasing concentration of wealth in the hands of those approaching retirement or already retired, will continue to fuel the opportunity for financial provision in, and preparing for, retirement. The impact of A-Day, the implementation of pensions simplification legislation in April 2006, initially dampened new business in certain areas, particularly in the retail annuities market, but subsequently led to considerable market growth in individual pensions, Self Invested Personal Pensions (SIPPs) and annuities. Much of the market growth in pensions savings reflected recycling of money as consumers consolidated existing pensions arrangements to one provider. The wholesale annuity and risk management market experienced increased competition over 2006, as short-term demand slowed and several new entrants started to participate. However, the long-term potential in this market remains considerable, with approximately £900 billion of funds held across a number of market segments. During 2006, Prudential UK Insurance Operations (Prudential UK) has continued to target capital efficient returns through selective participation within its chosen markets, Retirement Income, Wealth and Health and Wholesale. Going forward, Prudential UK will specifically focus on maximising value for shareholders through taking a leadership position in the retirement income and savings market. This will be achieved by building on its longevity and asset allocation strengths, as well as utilising its brand strength with older customers, targeting their specific retirement needs. This focus on maximising value will be achieved alongside a programme of cost cutting initiatives for both new business and Prudential UK’s back book to ensure that greater operating efficiencies are achieved. focused business model. In addition, FPP will continue to benefit from distribution to financial intermediaries through Prudential UK’s intermediary sales force. As of February 2007, PruHealth had 450 employees and over 100,000 customers, and its customer base, in contrast to the rest of the industry, has been growing at a rate of 15 per cent per month during 2006. Product leadership through strong innovation and multi-channel distribution strategy is expected to continue to deliver a significant market presence with 200,000 customers by the end of the year. PruHealth’s aim is to achieve breakeven in 2008 and to be profitable thereafter. Following the transfer of the protection business to the joint venture, the UK operations will be structured into three business units: Wholesale, Retail Retirement and Mature Life and Pensions. The strategy in Wholesale Retirement income is to participate selectively in bulk and back book buyouts, where Prudential UK is able to win business based on its financial strength, operational capability and superior track record as well as its extensive annuitant mortality risk assessment capabilities. Prudential UK will maintain a strict focus on value, only participating in transactions that generate an acceptable rate of return. In addition, Prudential UK provides pension management services (including full or partial buyouts) to corporate clients looking to manage or close pension deficits in cost-efficient ways. While there is currently limited activity in this market, Prudential UK believes opportunities will arise to help corporate clients manage significant amounts of pension assets, which are non-core to their operations. Retail Retirement will focus on savings and income for those customers nearing or in retirement. Retirement income will drive profitable growth in the core annuities business, building on the significant pipeline of vestings business over the next 30 years from maturing policies in its individual and corporate pensions books. This is enhanced by a number of strategic partnerships with third parties, where Prudential UK is the default annuity provider for customers vesting their pension at the point of retirement. The portfolio of retirement products also includes equity release products to provide more flexibility to customers with assets invested in property. Prudential will not participate directly in healthcare and protection but will instead expand its joint venture with Discovery Holding Limited (Discovery), the leading South African insurance company. It is expected that the Flexible Protection Plan (FPP) will be incorporated into the 50:50 Discovery joint venture during 2007. Both PruHealth and the FPP will utilise the successful ‘Vitality’ philosophy of a healthier lifestyle leading to lower protection premiums and have a dedicated sales force creating a more Prudential UK has exited the unprofitable front end commission markets for individual pensions and will transition from front end commission unit-linked bonds, particularly moving away from those areas of low persistency. Instead, Prudential UK will focus on new low risk multi-asset products which utilise Prudential UK’s strengths in asset allocation and use ‘factory gate pricing’ (negotiated between customer and adviser with separate advice costs). These products will target the significant number of retail United Kingdom APE sales NBP NBP margin (% APE) NBP margin (% PVNBP) Total EEV basis operating profit* Total IFRS operating profit* *Based on longer-term investment returns. 30 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 2006 £m 900 266 30% 3.4% 686 500 CER RER 2005 £m Percentage change 2005 £m Percentage change 892 243 27% 3.1% 426 400 1% 9% 61% 25% 892 243 27% 3.1% 426 400 1% 9% 61% 25% Directors’ report: Operating and financial review Business unit review: Insurance operations investors approaching retirement who have substantial assets outside personal or corporate pension plans, or have investments in poorly performing funds, and require inflation protection. Prudential UK remains committed to the corporate pensions market but will move to a tighter focus on larger schemes with better than average persistency and undertake a cost reduction programme. Together these are expected to deliver an IRR of 14 per cent by 2009. The corporate pensions book is an important source of vestings for the retail annuity business. Prudential UK will continue to deliver embedded value through the Mature Life and Pensions Business. It has an aggressive target to reduce per policy unit processing costs and is evaluating the best route for achieving this which will include one or all of internal cost cutting, further off-shoring or outsourcing. Prudential UK distributes products through both direct and intermediated channels. The direct channel will focus on capturing internal pension vesting business and Prudential UK’s equity release product via a specialist face-to-face direct sales force. The indirect channel will distribute products through retail intermediaries, strategic partners and through Employee Benefit Consultants (EBCs) and consulting actuaries. Participation within the intermediary market will be selective, targeting those advisers who focus on value and building client relationships. Prudential UK continues to investigate the opportunity for wrap platform development and views this as an integral component to ensure future access to distribution. Any involvement is likely to be in partnership with a third party. 2. Current year initiatives Over the course of 2006, Prudential UK has continued to deliver innovative new solutions to the market, building on the award-winning launches of PruHealth and the Property Value Release Plan, Prudential’s equity release product, in previous years. The new Flexible Protection Plan was launched in July 2006 to the Direct channel and to a limited group of intermediaries specialising in the protection market. This innovative protection product is designed to pay critical serious illness claimants earlier and more often than traditional protection products with, on average, four times as many serious illnesses covered. Payments are based on severity levels and multiple claims for the same illness or new illnesses are possible. Early results have been encouraging and as a result the product was rolled out nationally in February 2007 and is expected to be incorporated into the Discovery joint venture during 2007. Towards the end of 2006, Prudential UK received four stars in both the Life & Pension Providers category and the Investment Providers & Packages category at the FT Financial Adviser Practiv Services Awards. In addition, Prudential UK was ranked number one for service in the Life & Pension Annuities sector. These awards are widely recognised throughout the industry as independent recognition of a provider’s proposition, as they are voted on by intermediary financial advisers, who base the ratings on the level of service they receive from providers for new business processing, central processing, product support and commission payment. Prudential UK’s strength in retirement provision continued to be well recognised as it won the Moneywise Best Annuity Provider Award for the third year running and was awarded the best lifetime mortgage provider at the 2006 Equity Release Awards for the Property Value Release Plan, together with awards from Moneyfacts and Mortgage Strategy. In relation to its externally sourced annuity business, Prudential UK has signed further partnership agreements in 2006, including with Royal London which came into effect in September. This agreement allows Prudential UK to provide annuity quotes to all Royal London customers with maturing pensions which were originally written under various brands within the Royal London Group. In addition, Prudential UK signed an exclusive five-year agreement with Threadneedle as their supplier of annuities for their Stakeholder scheme, along with any future defined contribution schemes that Threadneedle acquires. This is a new area for Prudential UK that builds on its experience in providing annuities to the customers of life insurance companies. With the future growth in defined contribution schemes within the UK, Prudential UK expects more agreements of this type. Prudential UK and Save & Prosper have also signed a direct marketing agreement under which Save & Prosper will offer Prudential’s conventional annuity product on an exclusive basis to customers with maturing Save & Prosper pensions. The agreement is expected to take effect from mid-2007 and will run for five years. Prudential UK’s financial strength and continuing outstanding life fund investment returns have been well received by both customers and advisers, having a positive impact on with-profits product sales. Prudential UK has also signed new distribution agreements with National Australia Bank Group and Openwork for PruFund, Prudential UK’s unitised and smoothed investment plan. 3. Financial results and performance Prudential UK delivered a strong retail performance in 2006. Total APE sales of £900 million increased one per cent on 2005 and there was a nine per cent increase in NBP to £266 million, reflecting the significant increase in new business margin from 27 per cent to 30 per cent. This demonstrated the benefits of the selective participation strategy focusing on value pursued throughout 2006. APE new business premiums £m 1,000 800 600 400 200 0 892 900 2005 2006 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 31 Directors’ report: Operating and financial review Business unit review: Insurance operations Business unit review continued Insurance operations EEV basis new business profits £m 300 200 100 0 266 243 2005 2006 This performance was driven by underlying growth in the UK retail business (excludes credit life, bulks and back books): • Retail APE sales of £688 million were 14 per cent higher than 2005 (£605 million); • Retail NBP of £190 million was 67 per cent higher than 2005 (£114 million); and • Retail New business margin has increased to 28 per cent (2005: 19 per cent). Retail APE new business premiums £m 800 600 400 200 0 688 605 2005 2006 Retail EEV basis new business profits £m 190 200 150 100 114 50 0 2005 2006 32 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 The Retail life and pensions sales performance was primarily driven by strong individual annuity volumes, where Prudential UK has a 24 per cent market share (source: Association of British Insurers), together with increased sales of with-profits bonds and offshore bonds. These increases were offset by a decline in unit-linked bonds, protection and DWP rebate business. Individual annuity sales grew by 22 per cent to £271 million as the annuity market experienced increased activity in the second half of 2006 following the removal of uncertainty around A-Day pension changes. Sales volume has been driven primarily by the continued strength of internal vestings (which contributed around 50 per cent of individual annuity sales) together with the cumulative benefit of partnership deals signed in previous years. Individual annuity sales were also boosted by sales of with-profits annuities where sales have more than doubled to £37 million compared with 2005, and are expected to increase. From February 2007, customers are able to start using their Protected Rights Funds to buy with-profits annuities. This new feature is the first of its type and allows customers to combine 100 per cent of their pension into an asset-backed annuity without having to buy two separate annuities. Protected Rights is a term used to describe the funds held in a money purchase scheme derived from National Insurance rebates for those who contracted out of the State Earnings Related Pension Scheme (which was replaced by State Second Pension). With-profits sales were supported by the excellent with-profits bonus announcements in 2006, in respect of 2005, which were well received by both customers and advisers. This was reflected in APE sales of with-profits bonds up 44 per cent to £26 million. Corporate pension APE sales increased 23 per cent due in part to the continuing shift from defined benefit to defined contribution pension schemes but also due to the impact of A-Day. The sales upturn is also a reflection of Prudential UK’s re-engineered and improved account management capability, where the company works in partnership with the major Employee Benefit Consultants. Individual pension APE sales increased three per cent to £35 million due to increased activity following A-Day. PruHealth continues to grow strongly with full-year gross written premiums (GWP) up 300 per cent at £36 million (2005: £9 million). GWP from new lives (which is equivalent to new business APE) was £28 million. Contributing to this growth is the number of companies adopting PruHealth for their employee healthcare schemes, including the British Airways voluntary scheme, Smith and Nephew and Norton Rose. In the wholesale market, bulks and back book business APE volumes of £143 million were 70 per cent of those achieved in 2005. This reflected the selective participation strategy undertaken by Prudential UK to ensure margins and profitability were maintained in a period when the market experienced increased competition. Prudential UK completed two significant back book transactions in 2006. In January, it reached agreement with Royal London to acquire the portfolio of in-payment pension annuities that had been written primarily under the Royal London brand, but which also included some annuities written under the Refuge Assurance brand. The transaction generated premium income of £66 million on an APE basis. In June, Prudential Assurance Company (PAC) agreed to reinsure the non-profit immediate pension annuity portfolio of the Scottish Amicable Insurance Fund (SAIF) to Prudential Retirement Directors’ report: Operating and financial review Business unit review: Insurance operations Income Ltd (PRIL). SAIF is a closed sub-fund established by a court-approved Scheme of Arrangement in September 1997, in which Prudential shareholders have no economic interest. It contains a large proportion of the business originally written by the Scottish Amicable Life Assurance Society that was acquired by PAC in September 1997. The reinsurance premium for this transaction was £56 million on an APE basis. In December, Prudential UK reached agreement with Save & Prosper to acquire its portfolio of in-payment pension annuities. The book covers approximately 16,900 policies (weighted average age 72) with assets of around £135 million (£13.5 million APE). During 2007, the intention is for these annuity policies to transfer to Prudential, subject to legal and regulatory approvals, at which point Prudential will take over direct responsibility for the payment of all annuitants. Total credit life APE sales of £69 million generated NBP of £26 million in 2006 (£83 million and £35 million respectively in 2005). Credit life sales reduced in 2006 and will continue to do so in 2007 as Prudential UK’s credit life contract with Lloyds TSB, which in 2006 contributed APE sales of £63 million and NBP of £20 million, has not been renewed. Prudential UK will continue to participate in the credit life market, pricing on a case-by-case basis. In 2002, Prudential UK transferred its UK personal lines general insurance business to Winterthur, forming a strategic alliance with Churchill to offer Prudential-branded general insurance products for which Prudential receives a commission payment that has been offset against an advance payment made by Winterthur at completion resulting in a net payment to Prudential of £4 million in 2006. From 2008, under the terms of the contractual arrangement, the advance payment will have been fully offset, therefore Prudential UK is expected to receive approximately £30 million a year from the commission payments, although this will depend on the new business volumes and persistency rates. Prudential UK allocates shareholder capital to support new business growth across a wide range of products in the UK. The weighted average post-tax IRR on the capital allocated to new business growth in the UK in 2006 was 15 per cent, up by one percentage point from that achieved in 2005. The NBP increased nine per cent to £266 million, primarily reflecting an increase in margin from 27 per cent in 2005 to 30 per cent in 2006. This reflects an increase in profitability within the retail business, where the margin increased significantly, driven principally by individual annuities offset by a change in business mix following the lower sales of more profitable bulk annuities, credit life business and DWP rebates. EEV basis operating profit based on longer-term investment returns of £686 million, before restructuring costs of £34 million, were up 61 per cent on 2005. The in-force operating profit of £420 million was up 129 per cent on 2005, due to the increase in profits arising from the unwind of discount from the in-force book (reflecting an increase in the risk discount rates together with an increased opening embedded value); and because there were no operating assumption changes required in 2006, in comparison to 2005 when a charge of £148 million was made in respect of persistency. Other charges of £110 million include £32 million of costs associated with product and distribution development and complying with regulatory requirements including Sarbanes-Oxley; £9 million negative persistency experience variance; £14 million for an annual fee paid by the shareholder business to the PAC with-profits sub-fund for the use of the Prudential and Scottish Amicable trademarks; £16 million in respect of the tariff arrangement with SAIF, which is to be renegotiated in 2007; £26 million for tax related items and £13 million in relation other items. Prudential continues to manage actively the retention of the in-force book. During 2006, Prudential saw surrenders within its personal pension and DWP rebate business run ahead of assumptions following A-Day resulting in a small negative experience variance. All other lines of business performed in line with assumptions. IFRS operating profit before restructuring costs of £31 million increased 25 per cent to £500 million in 2006. This reflects a 22 per cent increase in profits attributable to the with-profits business, which contributed £368 million reflecting the strong investment performance of the Life-Fund and its impact on terminal bonuses. In addition, the result benefited from a £46 million positive impact of changes in FSA reserving requirements for protection and unit-linked products. 4. Outlook and forthcoming objectives While Prudential’s retail APE sales volume growth may fall in the short term, as it refocuses its retirement savings products, Prudential expects the UK financial services environment to remain favourable, and expects to achieve growth in line with the market (5 to 10 per cent) over the next five years. Prudential UK will continue to focus on profitable opportunities which deliver capital-efficient returns and will seek to maintain an aggregate 14 per cent IRR on new business. It will continue to pursue profitable opportunities in its chosen product areas and distribution channels in 2007. As previously announced, Prudential UK has targeted £150 million of cost savings by 2008 through the integration of Egg and other shareholder cost saving initiatives at a cost of £110 million. Of these target savings and costs, £35 million and £25 million respectively were due to be realised by Egg. Following the sale, the revised target savings for Prudential is £115 million. Prudential UK has, however, identified further cost saving initiatives which result in target cost savings for the UK business being increased to £195 million, to be achieved by 2010. The savings when achieved, net of restructuring costs, will result in a small positive assumption change on an EEV basis, estimated to be around £60 million. The cost savings will be achieved through a combination of internal cost saving, further off-shoring or outsourcing. The work of approximately 3,000 people in the customer service, customer operations and information technology areas will be in the core scope of this review. Prudential will comply with its legal obligations to consult with unions and employee representatives in relation to these proposals. The total cost of achieving the £195 million of savings is expected to be up to £165 million and will depend upon the final detail of the cost reduction programme. In connection with the sale of Egg, outline terms of a distribution agreement have been agreed in principle with Citi through which Prudential UK will provide life and pension products to Egg’s customers for a five-year period. Prudential UK sees Egg’s direct distribution capacity and access to its three million customers as powerful strategic assets, and this agreement enables it to preserve these benefits while reducing the risk to its balance sheet. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 33 Directors’ report: Operating and financial review Business unit review: Insurance operations Business unit review continued Insurance operations United States 1. Market review and summary of strategy The United States is the largest retirement savings market in the world, with 67 per cent, or US$12.9 trillion, of the world’s retirement assets concentrated in the US at the end of 2005 (Source: Cerulli Associates). As 78 million baby boomers (Source: US Census Bureau), born between 1946 and 1964, approach retirement age, the ageing demographics of the US are expected to increase annual retirement distributions to more than US$1 trillion per year by 2012. The combination of increasing average life expectancy and decreasing average retirement age in the US is leading to an increase in the average time individuals will spend in retirement. At the same time, the responsibility for providing income during retirement continues to shift away from institutions, such as government and employers, toward individuals. These changes, coupled with historically low savings rates in the US, have resulted in an increasing risk that individuals’ finances will be insufficient to cover the cost of living through retirement. These consumers will have a growing need for independent financial advice and increasingly seek guarantees and longevity protections from the financial products they purchase. Despite favourable demographics, US life insurers face challenges from both within and outside the industry. The US life insurance industry remains highly fragmented – the combination of all annuity companies ranked below the top 20 annuity sellers have more than twice the market share of the top annuity provider (Source: LIMRA) and competition for market share is expected to intensify. In addition to competing against each other, life insurers are increasingly competing with other financial services providers, in particular mutual fund companies and banks, for a share of retirement savings assets in the US. Sales of annuities in the career agency distribution channel continue to decline to the benefit of independent agents/broker-dealers due to increasing costs and regulatory burdens, as well as a growing pool of sophisticated investors increasingly seeking more independent investment advice. The US insurance industry faces continued regulatory scrutiny, particularly with respect to index and variable annuity products. The National Association of Securities Dealers Inc. (NASD) has issued guidelines requesting that its member firms provide stricter supervision of the marketing and sales of index annuities. In the variable annuity market, regulators continue to focus on product suitability in an effort to ensure that the products are sold appropriately to customers. There has also been regulatory pressure to reduce fees and costs associated with variable United States APE sales NBP NBP margin (% APE) NBP margin (% PVNBP) Total EEV basis operating profit* Total IFRS operating profit* annuities, which has increased advisor demand for providers to manufacture low-cost variable annuity options. Companies with quality distribution relationships, strong product manufacturing and below-industry-average cost structures are well positioned to compete effectively and continue to grow profitably. Significant convergence in the US financial services industry has yet to occur. As noted, the market remains fragmented with more business being consolidated organically among market participants with significant scale and sophisticated risk management functions. During 2006 and 2005, the S&P index increased 13.6 per cent and 3.0 per cent, respectively, increasing the attractiveness of products providing access to equity-based returns. During the same periods, interest rates trended upward. However, the short end of the yield curve rose more dramatically than the long end of the curve, resulting in a flat to inverted yield curve. This, combined with low spreads over Treasury bonds, created a difficult environment for the sale of properly priced fixed annuities. Jackson National Life Insurance Company (Jackson) provides retirement income and savings solutions in the mass and mass-affluent segments of the US market, primarily to near and post-retirees. It offers tools that help people plan for their retirement, and manufactures products with specialised features and guarantees to meet customers’ needs. By seeking to add value to both the representatives who sell Jackson products, and to their customers, Jackson has built a strong position in the US retirement savings and income market with the fastest growing variable annuity franchise measured by new sales growth during the past four years (Source: VARDS) and top-10 sales rankings in fixed index annuities and individual traditional deferred fixed annuities (Source: LIMRA). Jackson’s primary focus is manufacturing high-margin, capital-efficient products, such as variable annuities, and marketing these products to advice-based channels through its relationship-based distribution model. In developing new product offerings, Jackson leverages a low-cost, flexible technology platform to manufacture innovative, customisable products that can be brought to the market quickly. In 2006, 81 per cent of Jackson’s retail sales were from products and features developed and launched in 2006 and 2005. Jackson’s product offerings include variable, fixed and fixed index annuities, as well as life insurance and institutional products. Jackson’s annuity products are long-term personal retirement products, which offer tax-deferred accumulation on the funds invested until proceeds are withdrawn from the policy. Fixed annuities offer 2006 £m 614 259 42% 4.2% 718 408 CER RER 2005 £m Percentage change 2005 £m Percentage change 508 208 41% 4.1% 745 358 21% 25% (4)% 14% 515 211 41% 4.1% 755 362 19% 23% (5)% 13% *Based on longer-term investment returns and including broker-dealer and fund management and Curian. 34 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Directors’ report: Operating and financial review Business unit review: Insurance operations customers a guarantee of principal and a minimum guaranteed rate of return on their deposits. Fixed index annuities also offer these features, but vary from fixed annuities in that they offer the potential for additional interest to be credited based upon the performance of an equity index over a specified period. Variable annuity products differ from the fixed annuity products in that the returns to the customer will depend upon the performance of the underlying fund portfolio. Jackson’s variable annuity products offer a range of protection options, such as death, income and withdrawal benefits, which are priced separately by the company and can be elected by customers according to their individual needs. Jackson manages its exposure to equity market movements through a comprehensive hedging programme. Due to the increasing complexity of the retirement savings and income market and broad array of financial products being brought to market, professional advice is vital for customers to understand the choices available and to determine which products are best for their particular financial situation. Therefore, Jackson primarily markets its retail products through advice-based distribution channels, including independent agents, independent broker-dealer firms, regional broker-dealers, banks and registered investment advisors. Beginning in 2005, Jackson also began marketing products through its captive insurance agency, acquired through the purchase of Life of Georgia (LOG). Jackson supports its network of independent agents and advisors with award-winning marketing support and award-winning customer service. In 2006, the Service Quality Measurement Group recognised Jackson with a World Class Customer Satisfaction Award, and Jackson’s marketing campaigns won awards for achievement in graphic design, editorial content and overall communications excellence. Jackson complements its award-winning marketing and customer service with value-added services such as the Seminar Systems Unit, which helps advisors host educational seminars for clients on a variety of financial planning topics. In addition, Jackson recently launched the Retirement and Wealth Strategies Group, a unit dedicated to helping advisors better address their clients’ evolving retirement planning needs. By manufacturing and distributing a broad suite of platform-based products that can be tailored to an individual customer’s needs, Jackson has positioned itself to compete effectively in all phases of the business cycle based upon the quality and value of the products and services it provides, rather than price alone. Jackson’s institutional products division markets institutional products such as traditional Guaranteed Investment Contracts (GICs), Funding Agreements and Medium Term Note (MTN) funding agreements. Jackson distributes its institutional products directly to investors, through investment banks or through funding agreement brokers. This is a market in which Jackson continues to participate on an opportunistic basis. In early 2003, Jackson entered the registered investment advisor channel with the launch of Curian Capital. Curian provides innovative fee-based separately managed accounts and investment products to advisors through a sophisticated technology platform. In 1998, Jackson launched the National Planning Holdings (NPH) independent broker-dealer network with the formation of National Planning Corporation. Since its formation, NPH has grown through acquisitions to comprise four broker-dealer firms: INVEST Financial, Investment Centers of America, National Planning Corporation and SII Investments. By leveraging technology, NPH provides its advisors with the tools they need to operate their practices more efficiently. Through its relationship with NPH, Jackson has gained an important distribution outlet, plus invaluable insight into the needs of financial advisors and their clients. Jackson’s focus on current retirees and those approaching retirement age is not unique among US financial institutions. As a result, competition in this segment is expected to continue as the baby boomer generation retires and their retirement savings assets are moved from pre-retirement accumulation accounts into post-retirement income accounts. Jackson believes that its specialised product offerings, advice-based distribution model, sophisticated risk management function and low cost structure will offer a significant competitive advantage. As competition and regulatory challenges intensify, Jackson expects consolidation within the industry to continue at a measured pace. Further consolidation will provide an excellent opportunity for Jackson to leverage its efficient information technology platform and cost effective business model as an aggregator of annuity and life portfolios, as demonstrated with Jackson’s acquisition and integration of LOG in 2005. 2. Current year initiatives Jackson’s focus on maximising its opportunities in the evolving US market is embedded in the development of current and future strategic initiatives. These goals include a continued expansion of Jackson’s share of the US annuities and retail asset management markets. Expansion of Jackson’s share of the US annuities market will be largely contingent on continued expansion of existing product offerings, additional growth in new and existing distribution channels and opportunistic acquisition activity. Innovation in product design and speed to market continue to be key drivers of Jackson’s competitiveness. In January, Jackson added a five per cent annual benefit increase option to its popular lifetime guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefits (GMWBs). In February 2006, the company launched two new fixed index annuity contracts, Elite Choice and Elite Choice Rewards, which expanded the number of FIA products Jackson offers to five. In May, Jackson added five new GMWB options that provide contract holders with a guaranteed return of premium and lifetime income. Additionally, Jackson expanded its variable annuity fund offering during the year. In the near term, Jackson’s product development strategy includes further enhancement of its variable annuity offerings and the introduction of new guarantees, including a Guaranteed Minimum Accumulation Benefit (GMAB). In early 2007, Jackson launched a simplified retirement annuity that will serve as a low-cost option for financial advisors who are currently not participating in the variable annuity market. Additionally, Jackson launched its first set of retail Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 35 Directors’ report: Operating and financial review Business unit review: Insurance operations Business unit review continued Insurance operations mutual funds for distribution by existing wholesalers. Jackson’s new mutual funds are marketed as an additional option for financial advisors currently selling variable annuity products. Jackson will continue to build its relationship-based distribution advantage in the advice-based channels and explore additional distribution opportunities, including expansion into the wirehouse channel, as evidenced by the company’s recently announced distribution agreement with UBS. Jackson’s organisational flexibility and excellence in execution, coupled with its product innovation, successful distribution model and strong service offering, increased Jackson’s share of the US variable annuity market to 4.6 per cent in 2006 (VARDS), up from 3.6 per cent in 2005. Jackson also increased its share of variable annuity sales through the independent broker-dealer channel to 10.8 per cent at the end of 2006, up from 9.2 per cent at the end of 2005. Jackson continues to seek opportunities to deploy capital through opportunistic, value-creating acquisitions. Jackson demonstrated its ability to efficiently consolidate annuity and life portfolios by meeting or exceeding performance targets during the completion of its acquisition of LOG. Jackson integrated more than 1.5 million policies onto its platform within eight months of the acquisition date. The IRR on the acquisition of LOG exceeded 13 per cent and the purchase resulted in a gain of US$8.9 million (£4.8 million) as the net assets acquired exceeded the purchase price paid. Jackson’s continued expansion in the US retail asset management market will be led by the efforts of its independent broker-dealer network, NPH and Curian. NPH was ranked the seventh largest independent broker-dealer network in the US (source: Investment News magazine) and generated nearly US$12 billion in gross product sales and nearly US$500 million in revenues in 2006. Curian continues to be one of the fastest growing third-party separately managed account platforms in the US, with assets under management of US$2.4 billion at the end of 2006. Curian is expected to continue expansion of its product offerings and further improve efficiencies through planned improvements to its core technology system. Curian also continues to expand its distribution relationships with key financial institutions, as evidenced in recently announced agreements with AIG and Commonwealth Financial Group. 3. Financial results and performance Jackson has a diversified earnings base derived from spread, fee and underwriting income. Through strong growth in its variable annuity business during 2006, Jackson increased the share of revenue received from fee income and further diversified its revenue streams. Underwriting revenue from life insurance provides Jackson with stable cash flows to balance the volatility of cash flows from fixed annuities, thereby providing the company with a more stable earnings base and greater flexibility in how assets are invested. Jackson achieved record APE sales of £614 million in 2006, representing a 21 per cent increase on 2005, driven by strong growth in sales of variable annuities. On a PVNBP basis, new business sales were £6.1 billion. Retail APE sales in 2006 of £524 million were up 27 per cent. APE sales in the fourth quarter of 2006 were £147 million, up 43 per cent compared to the fourth quarter of 2005. 36 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 APE new business premiums £m 800 600 400 200 0 614 508 2005 2006 Jackson delivered record variable annuity sales in 2006 of £3.8 billion, up 48 per cent on last year. This reflects its distinct competitive advantages of an innovative product offering, an efficient and flexible technology platform, a relationship-driven distribution model and award-winning service. Jackson’s sales result was achieved in a market that grew 18 per cent year-on-year in 2006. Entry spreads for fixed annuities continued to be challenging during 2006, which limited the attractiveness of the market to Jackson. APE sales of £69 million were down 12 per cent on the same period in 2005. Fixed index annuity sales continued to be affected by the uncertain regulatory environment in the US. APE sales of £55 million were 10 per cent down on 2005. Jackson’s market share in 2006 was 3.7 per cent, compared to 3.8 per cent in the prior year. Institutional APE sales of £90 million were down eight per cent from 2005. Jackson participates in this market on an opportunistic basis. EEV basis NBP of £259 million was 25 per cent above the prior year, reflecting both a 21 per cent increase in APE sales and an increase in margin from 41 per cent to 42 per cent year-on-year. The increase in margin reflects a favourable business mix, economic assumption changes, and positive effects from the increase in election of high-margin guaranteed benefit options on variable annuity contracts, offset by more prudent operating assumptions. EEV basis new business profits £m 300 200 208 259 100 0 2005 2006 Directors’ report: Operating and financial review Business unit review: Insurance operations The variable annuity new business margin decreased slightly from 50 per cent in 2005 to 49 per cent in 2006. The fall in margin primarily reflects changes in assumptions for expenses and utilisation of lifetime guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefits, offset by economic assumption changes and a more favourable mix due to the increased election of guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefits. The fixed annuity new business margin fell from 23 per cent to 16 per cent reflecting changes to expense and cash withdrawal assumptions partly offset by economic assumption changes. The new business margin on institutional business improved due to the larger average duration contracts written during 2006. The average IRR on new business was 18 per cent compared to 15 per cent in 2005. While product IRRs are generally in line with returns reported for 2005 new business, the aggregate returns are higher due to a larger proportion of variable annuity sales in 2006 (64 per cent) as compared to 2005 (52 per cent). For variable annuities, the IRR has increased to 25 per cent in 2006 from 24 per cent last year due to higher interest rates and therefore a higher separate account return assumption. Total EEV basis operating profit for Jackson for 2006 was £708 million compared to £731 million in the prior year. In-force EEV profits of £449 million were 14 per cent below prior year profit of £523 million, primarily reflecting the inclusion in 2005 of an operating assumption change relating to price increases introduced on two older books of term life business representing £140 million. This was partially offset by an increase in the unwind of the in-force business during 2006 as a result of a higher opening embedded value and a higher risk discount rate as long-term interest rates increased. On a normalised basis, the EEV basis operating profit was up by 19 per cent. One-off items affecting the spread income variance totalled £46 million. The growth in IFRS operating profit for total US operations of 14 per cent from the prior year to £408 million primarily reflects an increase in fee and spread income over 2005. The improved spread income primarily reflects higher net average invested assets. Higher fee income was primarily driven by higher separate account assets given the growth in variable annuity sales, and an improvement in the average fees generated from those assets given the increase in election of high-margin guaranteed optional benefits. In 2006, spread income included a number of non-recurring items including mortgage prepayment fees, make-whole payments and total return swap income which together represent £33 million of spread, compared to £44 million in 2005, both net of DAC amortisation. At 31 December 2006, Jackson had more than US$74 billion (£38 billion) in GAAP assets. Of this total, US$22 billion related to separate account assets, an increase of more than US$7 billion compared to 2005 year end, further diversifying Jackson’s earnings toward fee-based income. NPH had a strong year with pre-tax profits up 51 per cent to £6 million. NPH, which is a network of four independent broker- dealers, increased gross product sales through the network to US$11.9 billion (£6.5 million) in 2006, an increase of 26 per cent over the prior year. NPH has also increased the number of registered advisors in its network to more than 2,600 at year end, further extending Jackson’s footprint in broker-dealer distribution. Curian recorded improved results with pre-tax losses of £8 million in 2006, improving from losses of £10 million in the prior year, as it continues to build scale in assets under management. At 31 December 2006, Curian had US$2.4 billion (£1.2 billion) of assets under management compared with US$1.7 billion (£853 million at CER) at the same point in the prior year. Jackson continues to maintain a strong capital position through capital conservation and strong earnings. At 31 December 2006, Jackson’s capital was well in excess of regulatory requirements with sufficient available capital to fund future bolt-on acquisitions. During 2006, Jackson increased the capital remittance to the Group to US$200 million, with future increases expected with continued growth. 4. Outlook and forthcoming objectives Jackson continues to deliver growth in the attractive US market and has further enhanced its competitive advantage in the variable annuity market, offering the product and service solutions that both customers and advisors desire. With its continued focus on product innovation, a proven relationship-based distribution model, award-winning service and excellence in execution, Jackson is well positioned to take advantage of the changing demographics and resulting opportunities in the US market. Asia 1.The Asian opportunity Asia remains a very attractive region for growth opportunities due to its high levels of economic activity translating into higher levels of personal wealth, greater disposable incomes and a growing appetite for good quality protection and savings products. Within this environment, ageing demographics are also beginning to drive increased household savings rates and an emerging need for retirement solutions. Asia APE sales NBP NBP margin (% APE) NBP margin (% PVNBP) Total EEV basis operating profit* Total IFRS operating profit* 2006 £m 956 514 54% 10.0% 829 189 CER RER 2005 £m Percentage change 2005 £m Percentage change 734 418 57% 10.3% 585 201 30% 23% 42% (6)% 731 413 56% 10.2% 576 195 31% 24% 44% (3)% *Based on longer-term investment returns and excluding fund management operations, development and Asia regional head office expenses. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 37 Directors’ report: Operating and financial review Business unit review: Insurance operations Business unit review continued Insurance operations Within Asia, each country typically has incumbent life insurers and asset managers and the majority of market share is concentrated in the top five players. For many years, these incumbents have used predominantly lower quality tied agency distribution and life products have tended to be simple, often with some form of guarantee that may be based on higher interest rates than the current prevailing ones. The country markets within Asia are extremely diverse and a ‘one size fits all’ business model does not work. Regional players must accommodate different stages of economic development, varying cultures, multiple languages, differing legal and regulatory regimes and competitors with different objectives and standards. Joint venture with local companies is also mandated in some markets and there is a limited pool of attractive partners. Regional players such as Prudential Corporation Asia have had considerable success across multiple Asian markets but, to date, this has been the exception rather than the rule with local players tending to stay within their markets and other international players, whilst successful in one or two markets, have not developed their businesses across the region. Opportunities for foreign players to access the Asia protection and savings markets have been increasing steadily and regulators in the region are becoming more accommodating regarding product and distribution innovation. These include unit-linked products, more professional non-agency channels and mandatory licensing of agents. Most notably, the significant markets of China and India have greatly opened up within the last few years. Despite the increasing opportunities in Asia, there are also challenges to expansion. Experienced staff and agents are very much in demand, particularly in markets such as China and India where the rapid growth of the industry has resulted in limited pools of resources. There is also the potential for mis-selling where there can often be a difference between the customer’s perception of product features and the reality which may take several years to become apparent. These challenges can be exacerbated by a media that is becoming more consumer focused as deregulation continues. During 2006, economic activity in the region remained strong and equity market performance was robust. We anticipate the Asian economic outlook will remain strong with domestic demand and foreign investment and capital inflow expected to increase, resulting in average GDP growth across Asia being around seven per cent for the next few years. 2. Prudential’s Asian strategy Since 1994 Prudential has implemented a strategy designed to build an Asian platform with the breadth and depth to deliver material shareholder value that is sustainable over the long term. This strategy has been executed by securing early access to countries with high potential customer bases, building and professionalising core tied agency distribution that is complemented by alternative channels such as bank partnerships, launching capital efficient consumer orientated products and supporting the entire structure with a sharp focus on excellent customer service. Underpinning the strategy is an investment in recruiting and training with the objective of retaining the best people in the industry. Prudential also continues to leverage the significant advantages from its well respected UK heritage including a 38 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 powerful brand, embodied by the Prudence icon, over 150 years experience as a market leader, and the governance and compliance infrastructure associated with a leading international business. Today, Prudential has life operations in 12 countries, including joint ventures with CITIC in China and ICICI in India. Prudential is a regional force in the life insurance and fund management business, and, at 31 December 2006 had 7.2 million customers in Asia and 14,000 staff. Brand recognition is high and Prudential’s customer centric delivery has been acknowledged through a number of awards, including second most trusted life insurance and asset management brand in India. Life insurance new business APE has grown at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 22 per cent since 2001 and funds under management, including Prudential’s market leading retail mutual fund business has grown at a CAGR of 25 per cent over the same period. For the first time this year, Asia also became a net contributor of cash to the Group, demonstrating the growing scale of the business. 3. Business priorities An ongoing priority for Prudential is to continue building distribution to drive growth. The agency strategy is tailored to each market, with the more developed markets typically focused on enhancing agency productivity and the newer markets emphasising increased distribution reach through growth in agent numbers. In China and India particularly, this means increasing geographic coverage through entering new cities and opening more branches. 2006 was a very successful year for the agency distribution channel with year-end 2006 agent numbers increasing by 114,000 in India, 11,000 in Indonesia and 5,000 in China compared to 2005. Agency productivity measured by APE per average agent also improved strongly during the year with Prudential’s more developed markets of Singapore, Hong Kong and Malaysia all showing double-digit improvement over 2005 of 23 per cent, 30 per cent and 32 per cent, respectively. Distribution from non-agency channels also grew strongly in 2006. Strong growth from bank distribution included record new business volumes from Standard Chartered Bank (SCB) in Hong Kong, an increasing proportion of new business from ICICI Bank in India and encouraging growth from Maybank and Singpost in Singapore. In addition, a new direct distribution initiative, PRUcall, was launched in Thailand during 2006, posting strong results to date. Prudential’s product strategy has been a key driver of its success. From the outset, the focus has been on predominantly regular premium products designed and targeted to meet customer needs. In the more emerging markets this is illustrated by the success of products that focus on providing for children and their education such as PRUkid in Vietnam. However, in an older and more developed market such as Korea, retirement-orientated unit-linked products such as PRUretire are proving popular. Prudential has led product innovation in a number of markets often working closely with the regulators. As a result, Prudential has been first to market with unit-linked products in Singapore, Malaysia, Taiwan, Indonesia, India, the Philippines and Korea. Unit-linked products are now a well established part of the overall portfolio generating 61 per cent of total new business APE in 2006 and, within the regulatory driven investment guidelines in each Directors’ report: Operating and financial review Business unit review: Insurance operations market, Prudential continues to expand the choice of investment funds available to customers, including third-party funds in markets where it makes sense. During 2006, Prudential launched a new universal life product in Malaysia to give customers more choice and in India, ICICI Prudential launched a ground-breaking new diabetes care product. Prudential has also made its first move into the takaful market by forming a joint venture with Bank Simpanan Nasional (BSN) in Malaysia and successfully launching its first linked product in November. As a result of this strategic focus on regular premium policies, capital efficient linked products and the high proportion of A&H riders, new business profit margins as a percentage of weighted sales tend to be higher in Asia than are seen elsewhere. The focus on effective distribution and profitable life products has proven more difficult to deliver in Japan. Neither tied agency nor general agency distribution were found to be economically viable and, whilst a profitable variable annuity product has been approved by the regulators, it has not been commercially attractive when compared to some competitor products. The business remains subscale and we continue to look for profitable growth opportunities in the market. Further demonstrating the benefits of scale that Prudential is beginning to realise in Asia, costs as a proportion of gross written premiums have been decreasing steadily from 16 per cent in 2002 to 11 per cent in 2006. However, continuing to increase efficiencies through greater use of common systems, platforms and processes across the region and the Group remains a priority. Prudential is committed to delivering material shareholder value from its Asian business and, during 2006, a number of steps were taken to strengthen the Asia regional management team with Barry Stowe becoming the new CEO in November 2006. Major market overviews China Prudential, with its joint venture partner CITIC, continues to be very well placed amongst the foreign players establishing themselves in this very attractive market. In 2006, CITIC-Prudential retained its position as the number two foreign player with new business APE growth of 56 per cent to £39 million and continued to successfully implement its strategy of geographic expansion receiving six new city licence awards from the regulators. New business profit margins of 43 per cent remain attractive but as would be expected, the business is currently making IFRS losses and consuming capital as it invests in new cities. The reduction in margin from 51 per cent in 2005 is primarily due to product mix and persistency assumption changes in 2006. Hong Kong The Hong Kong market grew strongly between 2000 and 2005 with a CAGR of 18 per cent and Prudential has consistently outperformed the market with a CAGR of 22 per cent over the same period. One reason for this is Prudential’s successful multi-channel model while most of the top five players in the market choose to focus on only one distribution channel. In 2006, 55 per cent of distribution came from agency and 45 per cent from bank distribution with SCB. During 2006, Hong Kong successfully focused on recruiting and training agents with average agent numbers and productivity up seven per cent and 15 per cent, respectively. Another priority for the business is to continue leveraging its strong partnership with SCB, and new business APE from this channel increased by 32 per cent in 2006. NBP margins on APE increased from 60 per cent to 69 per cent during 2006 reflecting improving experience. Hong Kong also generates material IFRS profits and is a net remitter of capital to the Group. As in Singapore and Korea, there are significant opportunities in the retirement sector in Hong Kong and Prudential is well placed with a marketing campaign already underway. India Prudential’s strategy of working with top quality joint venture partners has been very successful in India, where ICICI-Prudential Life is the clear leader amongst the private sector insurers and, with its nine per cent market share, is really making headway. This is a remarkable achievement given it has only been operating for six years. As reflected by the over 280 new branches opened during the year and the 165 per cent increase in agent numbers, the strategy in India has been to build scale rapidly. Bancassurance is also well established in India and generated 27 per cent of ICICI-Prudential’s new business in 2006. At 31 December 2006, ICICI-Prudential had 2.6 million policies in force. Whilst 96 per cent of India’s 2006 new business is made up of unit-linked products, margins are lower than in other Asian markets. This is driven primarily by relatively higher discount rates and more aggressive pricing. The margin of 23 per cent in 2006 is lower than the 29 per cent reported for 2005 primarily due to product mix and expense assumption changes. Prudential’s ownership of this venture is capped at 26 per cent by law and, although there is much speculation that this limit may be increased to 49 per cent in the future, there is no firm timetable in place. Prudential will consider an increase in its stake as and when this becomes a feasible option. Resulting from the fast pace of expansion, the business currently makes a loss under the IFRS basis and requires net capital injections. Indonesia Indonesia is a very attractive market with a population of 240 million and an increasingly stable and productive economy. Prudential is already a well established market leader and during 2006 has continued to aggressively expand its agency distribution with numbers up 49 per cent in the year. In addition to continuing to expand the agency force, Indonesia is expected to begin working with Citi in 2007 as announced at the time of the Egg sale. In 1997, Prudential successfully introduced unit-linked products in Indonesia, which now account for virtually all new business sold. The business is profitable under the IFRS basis and remitted surplus capital to the Group in 2006. Japan Prudential’s Japanese life insurance operation remains subscale, although 2006 saw new business double. A review of opportunities in Japan is underway. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 39 Directors’ report: Operating and financial review Business unit review: Insurance operations Business unit review continued Insurance operations Korea Prudential’s Korean life operation has an impressive growth track record with a CAGR of 82 per cent since its acquisition in 2001 and is the fastest growing company in the industry. This has resulted primarily from successful implementation of a multi-channel distribution and product innovation strategy that has differentiated Prudential from the market. New business APE in 2006 of £218 million was driven principally by the tied financial consultant channel (49 per cent) and the GA (broker) channel (38 per cent). Bancassurance volumes are limited by regulatory constraints which prescribe a maximum 25 per cent of banks’ sales volume from any one life insurer. This has negatively impacted bank distribution in Korea as Prudential reached this limit early on in the year with all its major bank partners. Direct distribution accounted for five per cent in 2006 and this reflects the more competitive environment at present. In 2007 Prudential will continue building on its advantaged distribution model, including new bank partnerships with Korea Bank and Shinhan Bank. Prudential Korea has benefited significantly from its innovative stance in the retirement space; and has been hugely successful with its ‘What’s your number’ campaign. Whilst lower than some other markets, new business profit margins in Korea remain attractive at 35 per cent and are driven by the high proportion of unit-linked products at 84 per cent of APE. As a result of its rapid growth, investment in building scale and the comparatively small size of the acquired in-force book, the business currently makes a loss under the IFRS basis and receives capital injections from the Group. Malaysia Prudential Malaysia had a challenging year in 2006 in part due to regulatory driven changes on illustrations which unsettled the industry. Against this backdrop Prudential Malaysia was able to grow by six per cent. Distribution in Malaysia is predominately tied agency as the current bank distribution regulations limit insurers to one bank partner. In 2007 the focus in Malaysia will be to continue expanding the agency force and further broaden the product range with a universal life product. For some time Prudential has seen the potential for takaful products in Malaysia and in 2006 formed a takaful joint venture with BSN, Prudential BSN Takaful. This launched in November and has started selling Shariah compliant linked life products through Prudential Malaysia’s tied agency force. Malaysia generates significant IFRS profits and makes material contributions of surplus capital to the Group. The Philippines Although it is a top 5 player in the Philippines, Prudential’s operation is small; during 2007 a major revamp of the agency channel and product portfolio will begin. Singapore Prudential is a leading player in Singapore and, over the five-year period 2001 to 2005, consistently outgrew the market. During 2006, Prudential Singapore delivered strong APE growth of 23 per cent driven by its strategy of growing and rejuvenating the agency force against the industry trend and implementing a number of agency productivity initiatives, including the 40 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 operationalisation of a sophisticated sales force automation tool to simplify the application process. Third-party distribution through Maybank and Singpost is also beginning to make meaningful contributions to new business. Prudential Singapore continues to sell a higher proportion of unit-linked business than the market supported by the strategy of enhancing the fund range. Given the size, longevity and quality of its in-force book, Singapore is a major contributor to Prudential Corporation Asia’s IFRS profits and generates material surplus operating cash which is remitted back to the Group. Looking ahead, growth opportunities in Singapore remain promising, particularly in the retirement space (both accumulation and drawn down). Taiwan Taiwan now has the highest life insurance penetration rate in the world measured by premiums as a percentage of GDP. To a large extent, however, this has been driven by competitors launching low-margin tactical products which capitalise on the current low interest rate environment. Prudential has deliberately avoided this tactic and its strategic priority continues to be to position the business for the long-term with quality, multi-channel distribution and profitable products. 2006 new business volumes decreased slightly compared to 2005 with agent numbers reducing by nine per cent reflecting the focus on quality as non-performers were terminated. There are also good opportunities for bancassurance in Taiwan and Prudential has five agreements in place with the intention to expand these further. Prudential continues to sell a higher proportion of unit-linked business than the market and for 2006 this was 58 per cent compared to 39 per cent. NBP margins at 55 per cent, are up from 51 per cent in 2005, at RER, primarily due to product mix changes. The Taiwan business continues to receive capital support from the Group to maintain solvency resulting from current negative spread on the back book acquired in 1999. During 2006, interest rates did not increase from their current low levels as expected, although the long-term assumption remains that these will rise. Looking ahead, priorities for the Taiwan life business include driving greater rider attachments and direct marketing with A&H products. Thailand For many years, Prudential has struggled to make headway with agency distribution in Thailand; however, during 2006 it launched a call centre in support of its direct marketing operation. Although still small, the results to date have been very encouraging contributing to new business APE growing 81 per cent in 2006. Vietnam In Vietnam, Prudential has retained its market leading position but the market continues to be depressed following the initial post-liberalisation boom. The longer-term potential remains excellent and Prudential continues to develop and build its agency distribution. Directors’ report: Operating and financial review Business unit review: Insurance operations 4. Financial results and performance In financial terms, 2006 was another strong year. Prudential Corporation Asia’s new business APE grew by 30 per cent to £956 million. New business profit margins remain robust at 54 per cent with the net two per cent change from 56 per cent in 2005 at RER, principally attributed to higher proportion of new business in the mix from lower margin geographies. The percentage of unit-linked products, which are more capital efficient, remained high at 64 per cent compared to 63 per cent in 2005. APE new business premiums £m 1,000 800 600 400 200 0 956 734 2005 2006 EEV basis new business profit £m 600 400 418 514 200 0 2005 2006 Long-term EEV operating profits of £829 million are up 42 per cent over 2005 and are principally driven by new business profits of £514 million and an 89 per cent increase in in-force profits, from £167 million in 2005 to £315 million in 2006. This includes the increase in unwind across all countries, positive operating assumption changes of £45 million together with positive experience and other variances of £16 million. Operating assumption changes include positive mortality and persistency assumption changes which are the net result of a number of small movements in countries across the region. In addition, there are positive expense assumption changes, primarily the result of uplifting the Prudential Asset Management (PAM) profit assumptions across Asia. Within experience variances, there is a positive persistency experience variance which is the net result of a number of small variances in countries across the region. There is negative expense experience in China and India, as expected, as these operations expand rapidly. Total EEV shareholders’ funds at 31 December 2006 were £2.5 billion, up 28 per cent on 31 December 2005. IFRS operating profits increased 11 per cent to £189 million, compared to 2005, excluding 2005 net exceptional items of positive £30 million. This reflects the steady increase in profits from the established markets of Singapore, Malaysia and Hong Kong with total IFRS operating profits of £139 million, and the emergence of profits on the IFRS basis from some of the newer operations as they build scale. Total shareholders’ funds on the IFRS basis, of £1.29 billion, increased by 12 per cent compared to 2005. IRRs for Asia were in excess of 20 per cent for 2006. In Asia, Prudential has target IRRs on new business at a country level of 10 percentage points over the country risk discount rate. Risk discount rates vary from five per cent to 18 per cent depending upon the risks in each country market. These target rates of return are average rates and the marginal return on capital on a particular product could be above or below the target. As expected, overall Prudential Asia became a net contributor of cash to the Group with a net remittance of surplus capital of £28 million during 2006. 5. Outlook for 2007 The opportunities for profitable growth in Asia remain compelling and Prudential is very well placed with an excellent platform. The focus going forward will be continuing to focus on developing its existing strengths in terms of growing agency scale and productivity, improving and expanding partnership distribution and continuing product innovation. There is also the opportunity to deepen and strengthen relationships with the over nine million customers already on the books with a disciplined and systematic approach. The retirement opportunity is clear and Prudential is developing a comprehensive approach to this in terms of accumulation, drawn down and associated protection needs. Prudential Asia will be leveraging its very successful Korean media campaign ‘What’s your number’ to other markets during 2007. Prudential has not leveraged its strengths to building scale direct distribution as yet and this will be a priority in the future. Prudential will also be re-examining its approach to health products as there are significant opportunities to create value for shareholders and customer above and beyond what is already being done. Prudential remains committed to the target of at least doubling its 2005 new business profit by 2009, and expect to generate increasing levels of cash from the region. In summary, the outlook for the life insurance business in 2007 remains very positive. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 41 Directors’ report: Operating and financial review Business unit review: Asset management Business unit review continued Asset management Global The Prudential Group’s asset management businesses are very successful. Not only do they provide value to the insurance businesses within the Group, but also are important profit generators in their own right, with low capital requirements and generating significant cash flow for the Group. The asset management businesses are well placed to capitalise on their leading market positions and strong track records in investment performance to deliver net flows and profit growth as well as strategically diversifying the Group’s investment propositions in retail financial services (RFS) markets that are increasingly favouring greater product transparency, greater cross-border opportunities and more open-architecture investment platforms. Wholesale profit streams are also growing. The Group’s asset management businesses operate different models and under different brands tailored to their markets and strengths, but are increasingly working together by managing money for each other with clear regional specialism, distributing each others’ products and sharing knowledge and expertise, such as credit research. Each business and its performance in 2006 is summarised below. M&G 1. Market review and summary of strategy M&G is Prudential’s UK and European fund management business and has £164 billion of funds under management, of which £119 billion relates to Prudential’s long-term business funds. M&G aims to maximise profitable growth by operating in markets where it has a leading position and competitive advantage, including retail fund management, institutional fixed income, pooled life and pension funds, property and private finance. M&G also manages Prudential’s balance sheet for profit. M&G is an investment-led business with a demonstrable focus on performance delivery and aims to offer attractive products in a variety of macro-economic environments. M&G has scale in all key asset classes: it is one of the largest active managers in the UK stock market, one of the largest bond investors in the UK and one of the UK’s largest property investors. M&G Gross investment flows Net investment flows Underlying profit before PRF performance-related fees Total IFRS operating profit* *Based on longer-term investment returns. 42 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 M&G is made up of three distinct and autonomous businesses – Retail, Wholesale and Prudential Finance – each with its own strategy for the markets in which it operates. The UK and European retail asset management industry has grown strongly during 2006 as rising stock markets have increased the value of existing funds under management and attracted investors back into the market. M&G’s retail strategy is to maximise the leverage of its strong investment performance, multi-channel distribution and efficient operating platform. The asset management sector has continued to benefit from the increasing shift by retail investors from opaque to transparent investment products, such as unit trusts, and M&G’s range of market leading funds has positioned it well to benefit from this trend. European cross-border distribution has accelerated and the trend in favour of ‘Open Architecture’ in both the UK and Europe has continued to open up significant bank and life company distribution opportunities. Parallel to this, distribution of mutual funds has become increasingly intermediated and has been accompanied by the rise of professional buyers who demand higher levels of service and investment information, areas in which M&G has considerable expertise. Institutional markets are demanding increasingly sophisticated and tailored products and 2006 saw a rising awareness of asset/liability matching and a continued shift from balanced to specialist mandates. These trends, plus the increased role of fixed income within portfolios, continue to play to the strength and scale of M&G’s wholesale business. M&G’s wholesale strategy is twofold: to add value to its internal clients through investment performance, liability matching and investment in innovative and attractive areas of capital markets and to utilise the skills developed primarily for internal funds to build new business streams and diversify revenues. Examples of new business streams include leveraged loans, collateralised debt obligations (CDOs), infrastructure finance and the Episode global macro hedge fund. Demand has increased for alternative investments and structured credit expertise, meaning that managers who offer value-adding skills, such as M&G, are able to command attractive margins. With its strong track record and market leading reputation, M&G remains well placed to continue to benefit from this trend. CER RER 2006 £m 2005 £m Percentage change 2005 £m Percentage change 13,486 6,101 177 204 7,916 3,862 138 163 70% 58% 28% 25% 7,916 3,862 138 163 70% 58% 28% 25% Directors’ report: Operating and financial review Business unit review: Asset management Prudential Finance was set up to manage Prudential’s balance sheet for profit. In addition to acting as the internal banker to the Prudential Group and its subsidiaries, Prudential Finance’s strategy is to leverage Prudential’s and M&G’s positioning and skills for profit. Its activities include bridging transactions, property financing and securities lending with a focus on deals which have high profitability and capital velocity but low capital usage. 2. Current year initiatives M&G maintained its reputation for strong fund performance and product innovation during 2006 and continued to expand its multi-channel distribution model. In the retail market, the excellent fund performance of M&G’s fund range was recognised by M&G being named Best Equity Group (Large) and Best Non UK Equity Group (Large) at the Lipper Fund Awards 2006. M&G continued to innovate during the year by extending its fixed income and property fund ranges with the launch of two new funds, the M&G Optimal Income Fund and the M&G European Property Fund. M&G expanded its retail distribution in 2006 by adding Spain to the European countries in which it operates and in the UK significantly expanded its links with life company platforms. In the wholesale marketplace, M&G benefited from increasing demand from clients for specialist mandates and liability matching, both of which are core areas of expertise for M&G. Strong fund performance was maintained with 86 per cent of segregated funds beating their benchmark over one year and 90 per cent over three years. M&G continued to develop its market leading positions in structured credit and leveraged loans and also its position in infrastructure finance. Utilising skills developed for the internal funds, M&G has built significant new business streams with external third parties over the past five years. In structured credit, seven new CDOs were launched in 2006 and M&G was named CDO manager of the year by the International Securitisation Report. M&G’s infrastructure fund, InfraCapital, made its first purchase as part of a consortium which made a successful bid for Associated British Ports plc. Following a soft launch in August 2005, M&G rolled out its Episode global macro hedge fund in February last year, a fund which again uses investment expertise originally developed for internal funds. Episode has been a notable success with external clients and by year end had reached assets under management of US$1.5 billion. 3. Financial results and performance M&G delivered significant profit growth during 2006 on the back of rising market levels, strong net inflows and continued business diversification. Operating profits, which include performance related fees (PRF), increased 25 per cent to £204 million. Underlying profits, excluding PRF, were £177 million, an increase of 28 per cent compared to the previous year. PRF increased by 11 per cent over 2005, totalling £27 million for 2006. As a result, M&G’s cost income ratio improved from 66 per cent to 64 per cent in 2006. IFRS basis operating profit based on longer-term investment returns £m 250 200 150 163 204 100 50 0 2005 2006 Net investment flows £m 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 6,101 3,862 2005 2006 External FUM £bn 50 40 30 20 10 0 45 36 2005 2006 In addition to adding significant value via the management of Prudential’s internal funds, M&G remains an important generator of earnings and cash for the Prudential Group. Since 2002, M&G has delivered strong profit growth which has seen underlying profits more than triple. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 43 Directors’ report: Operating and financial review Business unit review: Asset management Business unit review continued Asset management Outstanding fund performance led to record fund inflows into M&G’s retail and wholesale businesses during 2006. Gross fund inflows were £13.5 billion, an increase of 70 per cent on the previous year. Net fund inflows were their highest ever, increasing by 58 per cent to £6.1 billion. External funds under management grew significantly, up 24 per cent to £45 billion, and at this level represent over a quarter of M&G’s total funds under management. In the retail marketplace, demand remained strong for M&G’s high alpha equity and competitive fixed income and property offerings, with gross fund inflows increasing by 75 per cent to £6.7 billion and net fund inflows more than doubling to £3.1 billion. Product innovation has remained key for opening up new markets for M&G and 66 per cent of gross mutual fund inflows in 2006 through UK and European distribution channels were into funds launched or re-engineered within the past six years. Sales were strong across all retail markets. Excellent progress was made in the UK and across the European markets of Germany, Austria, Switzerland, Luxembourg, Italy and Spain. In Germany, the first European market entered (in 2002), M&G is now the number three foreign provider and in just four years has risen to number nine in net sales against all providers in the German marketplace. In an official FERI ranking of the best selling funds by UK fund managers across the UK and Europe in 2006, M&G had three funds represented in the top 20. In South Africa, M&G’s business was last year ranked number one by net inflows in the market only five years on from launch. M&G’s wholesale business also saw substantial growth, with gross fund inflows increasing by 66 per cent to £6.8 billion and net inflows rising 19 per cent to £3 billion. M&G’s scale and market reputation in fixed income continued to position it very favourably in both traditional areas of the market, such as segregated funds, and alternative areas such as structured credit. 4. Outlook and forthcoming objectives M&G’s priorities for the year ahead are to: • deliver investment outperformance to its clients; • distribute through existing channels and exploit new opportunities; • leverage its scale and capabilities to develop innovative products for the retail and wholesale marketplaces; and • deliver attractive returns to Prudential. Asia Net investment flows Total IFRS operating profit* *Based on longer-term investment results. Asia Fund Management 1. Market review The mutual fund market in Asia2 has grown at a CAGR of 22 per cent from end 2003 to end 2006 with £720 billion of assets under management at 31 December 2006 with Japan and Korea accounting for over three quarters of the total FUM. China and India have been the fastest growing markets over this period with annual growth rates of 57 per cent and 31 per cent respectively. Over the past few years, appetite for risk-based products has gradually been increasing and during 2006, Asian investors have shown increased interest in equity-focused funds. Regulatory change has also continued to drive demand for Luxembourg based offshore products. 2. Prudential’s strategy Prudential’s fund management business serves both the life companies in Asia by managing the life funds and by designing and managing the funds underlying the investment linked products and third-party customers through a growing mutual fund business. Given that the majority of individuals’ personal financial assets currently reside in bank deposits in Asia (Source: Citi Asia Pacific Household Balance Sheets 2005), Prudential continues to grow its third-party mutual fund business by developing strong customer propositions to cater to an estimated potential 450 million customers for mutual fund products in Asia. Prudential’s strategy is underpinned by building local operating entities with local market knowledge and expertise and supporting these with strong regional capabilities. Given the significance of bank distribution, broadening distribution reach involves developing strong relationships with regional and local bank distributors and providing better servicing. Continued delivery of strong and consistent fund performance is essential in maintaining the credibility of the Prudential brand in this market. Today, Prudential’s fund management business in Asia is the second largest retail fund management company in terms of Asia (ex Japan) sourced retail FUM as of June 2006 (Source: Asia Asset Management Sept 2006 for survey participants). Including institutional and insurance assets, Prudential’s fund management business was ranked in June 2006 as the third largest asset manager in terms of overall assets sourced in Asia ex Japan, compared with its fifth ranking in 2005. CER RER 2006 £m 2,532 50 2005 £m Percentage change 2005 £m Percentage change 1,321 11 92% 355% 1,328 12 91% 317% 2. Asia here refers to the eight countries of China, India, Korea, Japan, Taiwan, Singapore, Malaysia (Private Funds) and Hong Kong (Local retail funds) Sources: Cerulli Associates, Monetary Authority of Singapore, Association of Mututal Fund in India, Securities Inv Trust Association, KITCA. 44 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Directors’ report: Operating and financial review Business unit review: Asset management 3. Progress in 2006 In 2006, Prudential entered three new markets: China, Vietnam and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). In China, Prudential’s joint venture with CITIC launched two retail mutual funds during the year and raised £414 million (Prudential share at £137 million). In Vietnam, Prudential launched its first mutual fund and an offshore fund investing in Vietnam, together raising £163 million. A licence was obtained for doing business in the UAE, with an office in Dubai. Prudential continued to build on its existing platform in Asia with specific focus on the markets of India, Korea and Japan. In India, Prudential’s joint venture with ICICI Bank grew assets under management by 53 per cent; in Korea, Prudential’s business grew assets by 33 per cent and in Japan – the region’s largest market – assets grew by 20 per cent. PRUPIM Singapore – a joint venture with PRUPIM in the UK – was established with its first core fund with a gross asset value of US$616 million. This gives the business an entry into the real estate space which is a fast growing and attractive segment of the business. 4. Financial results and performance Prudential’s fund management business achieved record net inflows for 2006, with £2.5 billion being almost twice that of 2005. This reflects the strengths of the Asian Fund Management’s geographic and product diversification. Prudential’s total FUM as at 31 December were £29.2 billion and included £6.2 billion of assets from the Group, £10.6 billion from Prudential Corporation Asia’s life funds and £12.3 billion from the retail operations. This is an increase of 22 per cent from 31 December 2005, though mutual funds through the retail operations grew by 33 per cent. IFRS profits from fund management operations were £50 million, up 85 per cent on 2005, excluding 2005 exceptional items. 5. Outlook for 2007 The main focus for 2007 will be to continue to pursue profitable opportunities in all markets but more specifically in the key growth markets of China and India and the large Japanese and Korean markets. The fund range will continue to be expanded through expanding both onshore and offshore funds and developing real estate and Islamic funds. Distribution will be broadened and deepened through relationships with channel partners in the individual countries and regionally. PPM America 1. Market review and summary of strategy PPM America (PPMA) manages assets for Prudential’s US, UK and Asian affiliates. PPMA also provides investment services to other affiliated and unaffiliated institutional clients including CDOs, private investment funds, institutional accounts and mutual funds. PPMA’s strategy is focused on effectively managing existing assets, maximising synergies with international asset management affiliates and leveraging investment management capabilities across the Prudential Group. A summary of PPMA’s year end 2006 assets under management follows: PPMA funds under management US (US$ billions) Insurance Retail Institutional CDOs Total 45.5 0.0 0.2 3.6 49.3 UK 16.3 2.5 0.0 0.0 18.8 Asia 0.5 5.0 0.0 0.0 5.5 Total 62.3 7.5 0.2 3.6 73.6 2. Current year initiatives During 2006, PPMA executed several initiatives to improve operational effectiveness and scalability, including the enhancement of fixed income analytical capabilities. Initiatives designed to maximise synergies within the Group included leveraging PPMA’s capabilities to manufacture financial products distributed by affiliates. 3. Financial results and performance Investment performance was favourable in 2006, particularly across US affiliate portfolios, the US public equity and fixed income components of the portfolios managed for UK affiliates and CDOs. IFRS operating profit in 2006 was £12 million versus £20 million in 2005. The 2005 results benefited from a £5 million positive non-recurring item related to revaluation of a CDO. 4. Outlook and forthcoming objectives The 2007 outlook is positive driven by current momentum, favourable economic and market conditions, and the growth prospects of internal clients. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 45 Non-interest income reduced by 36 per cent to £138 million following a significant reduction in personal loan insurance income as Egg reduced its exposure to the unsecured loans business. Total new loan sales reduced to 83,000, which is approximately 50 per cent of the new volumes achieved in 2005. In addition, payment protection insurance (PPI) penetration rates were far lower than that experienced in 2005. Other non-interest card income is lower than 2005, reflecting consumer spend patterns and continuing regulatory focus on the creditor insurance market, resulting in reductions in commission revenue earned. Egg’s loan book performance reflects the industry-wide increase in consumers using individual voluntary arrangements, debt management companies and in some cases bankruptcy to alleviate their debt burden. Within the Egg personal loan portfolio, the number of customers employing debt management companies in the last quarter increased 18 per cent on the prior quarter. These arrangements typically result in lower recoveries from customers than have historically been achieved via Egg’s collection strategies. The overall deterioration in credit led to the total charge for bad debts increasing by £143 million to £382 million. Restructuring costs of £12 million were incurred during 2006. Directors’ report: Operating and financial review Business unit review: Banking Business unit review continued Banking Egg 1. Market review and summary of strategy The high level of consumer indebtedness has led to a sharp increase in the number of individuals seeking to restructure their credit obligations. This has been observed through higher levels of personal bankruptcies and individual voluntary arrangements: the number of personal insolvencies has risen at an annual rate of over 50 per cent. These factors have given rise to increased bad debt provisions across the UK banking industry. In January 2007, Prudential concluded that its current banking business does not represent the best opportunity for it to drive profitable growth in the future and it announced the sale of Egg to Citi for £575 million, with the transaction expected to complete later in 2007, subject to regulatory approvals. Citi is the largest credit card issuer in the world and a group that is well placed to develop and grow Egg’s franchise. As part of the transaction, Prudential has agreed in principle outline terms of a five-year agreement to distribute life and pension products through Egg. Prudential has also been selected as a strategic provider to Citi for the distribution of life insurance products to Citi’s consumer banking customers in Thailand, Indonesia and the Philippines. The transaction will improve Prudential’s capital position and is expected to increase Prudential’s solvency surplus under FCD by an estimated £300 million. 2. Financial results and performance Egg’s total operating loss in 2006 was £145 million, compared with a profit of £44 million in 2005. This result reflects a marked deterioration in industry-wide consumer behaviour. This has resulted in a reduction of net borrowing on credit cards as consumers reduce their spending and borrowing. In addition, bad debt experience is considerably worse than expected, particularly in relation to personal loans. During 2006, Egg made a number of changes to its lending approach. On unsecured loans, Egg’s strategy was to tactically reduce its exposure and it tightened the acceptance criteria throughout the year. This resulted in a significantly reduced level of sales, and associated insurance income. Egg also changed its approach to the management of the credit card book, and it adopted the standard industry policy of charging variable interest rates in relation to a customer’s expected risk profile. Throughout the industry, 2006 saw an increase in the application of balance transfer fees, therefore reducing the levels of balance transfer activity. Egg’s net interest income of £330 million increased six per cent in 2006. Slightly lower customer balances were offset by the effects of a higher interest rate environment. 46 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Directors’ report: Operating and financial review Other corporate information Other corporate information Explanation of balance sheet structure The Group’s capital on an IFRS basis comprises of shareholders’ funds of £5,488 million, subordinated long-term and perpetual debt of £1,989 million, other core structural borrowings of £1,074 million and the unallocated surplus of with-profits funds of £13.6 billion. Subordinated or hybrid debt is debt capital which has some equity-like features and which would rank below other senior debt in the event of a liquidation. These features allow hybrid debt to be treated as capital for FSA regulatory purposes. All of the Group’s hybrid debt which qualifies in this way is held at the Group level and is therefore taken as capital into the parent solvency test under the FCD. The FSA has established a structure for determining how much hybrid debt can count as capital which is similar to that used for banks. It categorises capital as Tier 1 (equity and preference shares), Upper Tier 2 and Lower Tier 2. Up to 15 per cent of Tier 1 can be in the form of hybrid debt and called ‘Innovative Tier 1’. At 31 December 2006, the Group held £763 million of Innovative Tier 1 capital, in the form of perpetual securities, £250 million of Upper Tier 2 and £1,103 million of Lower Tier 2 capital. Following the implementation of the FCD, it is advantageous to the Group from a regulatory capital standpoint to raise its long-term debt in hybrid form and it is the Group’s policy to take advantage of favourable market conditions as they arise to do so. The unallocated surplus of the with-profits funds represents assets in the life fund which have not yet been allocated either to policyholders or shareholders. They are not generally available to the Group other than as they emerge through the statutory transfer of the shareholders’ share of the surplus as it emerges from the fund over time. Weighted average cost of capital (WACC) Prudential’s commitment to its shareholders is to maximise the value of Prudential over time by delivering superior financial returns. Prudential’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC) is circa 9.6 per cent, which is based on the net core debt and shares outstanding at the end of 2006, an equity market premium of four per cent and a market beta of 1.4. Prudential’s WACC has increased since the end of 2005 largely due to an increase in interest rates and to equity forming a greater proportion of capital. Financial instruments The Group is exposed to financial risk through its financial assets, financial liabilities, and policyholder liabilities. The financial risk factors affecting the Group include market risk, foreign exchange risk, credit risk and liquidity risk. Information on the financial risk management objectives and policies of the Group and the exposure of the Group to the financial risk factors is given in Section C on pages 136 to 138. Further information on the use of derivatives and hedge accounting by the Group is also provided in notes D3 and G3 on pages 155 and 156 and 195 to 197 respectively. Shareholders’ borrowings and financial flexibility Net core structural borrowings at 31 December 2006 were £1,493 million compared with £1,611 million at 31 December 2005. This reflects the net cash outflow of £104 million, exchange conversion gains of £240 million and other adjustments of £18 million. After adjusting for holding company cash and short-term investments of £1,119 million, core structural borrowings of shareholder-financed operations (excluding Egg) at the end of 2006 totalled £2,612 million, compared with £2,739 million at the end of 2005. This decrease reflected exchange conversion gains of £135 million and other adjustments of £8 million. Core long-term loans at the end of 2006 included £1,626 million at fixed rates of interest with maturity dates ranging from 2007 to perpetuity. Core borrowings of £890 million were denominated in US dollars, to hedge partially the currency exposure arising from the Group’s investment in Jackson. Prudential has in place an unlimited global commercial paper programme. At 31 December 2006, commercial paper of £198 million, US$3,449 million and ¤85 million has been issued under this programme. Prudential also has in place a £5,000 million medium-term note (MTN) programme. At 31 December 2006, subordinated debt outstanding under this programme was £435 million and ¤520 million, and senior debt outstanding was US$18 million and £5 million. In addition, the holding company has access to £1,600 million committed revolving credit facilities, provided by 16 major international banks and a £500 million committed securities lending liquidity facility. These facilities have not been drawn on during the year. The commercial paper programme, the MTN programme, the committed revolving credit facilities and the committed securities lending liquidity facility are available for general corporate purposes and to support the liquidity needs of the parent company. The Group’s insurance and asset management operations are funded centrally. Egg, as a separate bank, is responsible for its own financing. The Group’s core debt is managed to be within a target level consistent with its current debt ratings. At 31 December 2006, the gearing ratio (debt, net of cash and short-term investments, as a proportion of EEV shareholders’ funds plus debt) was 11.2 per cent compared with 13.5 per cent at 31 December 2005. Prudential plc enjoys strong debt ratings from both Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s. Prudential long-term senior debt is rated A+ (stable outlook), A2 (stable outlook) and AA- from Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s and Fitch respectively, while short-term ratings are A1, P-1 and F1+. Based on EEV basis operating profit from continuing operations and interest payable on core structural borrowings (excluding Egg), interest cover was 12.2 times in 2006 compared with 10.8 times in 2005. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 47 Directors’ report: Operating and financial review Other corporate information Other corporate information continued Treasury policy Regulatory capital requirements The Group operates a central treasury function, which has overall responsibility for managing its capital funding programme as well as its central cash and liquidity positions. The aim of Prudential’s capital funding programme, which includes the £5,000 million MTN programme together with the unlimited commercial paper programme, is to maintain a strong and flexible funding capacity. Prudential UK and Prudential Corporation Asia use derivatives to reduce equity risk, interest rate and currency exposures, and to facilitate efficient investment management. In the US, Jackson uses derivatives to reduce interest rate risk, to facilitate efficient portfolio management and to match liabilities under fixed index policies. It is Prudential’s policy that all free-standing derivatives are used to hedge exposures or facilitate efficient portfolio management. Amounts at risk are covered by cash or by corresponding assets. Due to the geographical diversity of Prudential’s businesses, it is subject to the risk of exchange rate fluctuations. Prudential’s international operations in the US and Asia, which represent a significant proportion of operating profit and shareholders’ funds, generally write policies and invest in assets denominated in local currency. Although this practice limits the effect of exchange rate fluctuations on local operating results, it can lead to significant fluctuations in Prudential’s consolidated financial statements upon conversion of results into pounds sterling. The currency exposure relating to the conversion of reported earnings is not separately managed, as it is not in the economic interests of the Group to do so. The impact of gains or losses on currency conversions is recorded as a component of shareholders’ funds within the statement of recognised income and expense. The impact of exchange rate fluctuations in 2006 is discussed elsewhere in this OFR. Unallocated surplus of with-profits During 2006, the unallocated surplus, which represents the excess of assets over policyholder liabilities for the Group’s with-profits funds on a statutory basis, grew from £11.3 billion at 1 January to £13.6 billion at 31 December. This reflects an increase in the cumulative retained earnings arising on with-profits business that have yet to be allocated to policyholders or shareholders. The change in 2006 predominantly reflects the positive investment return earned by the PAC with-profits fund as a result of investment gains in the UK equity market. The FCD, which affects groups with significant cross-sector activities in insurance and banking/investment services, came into force for Prudential from 1 January 2005. Prior to this, since 1 January 2001 Prudential was required to meet the solvency requirements of the Insurance Groups Directive (IGD), as implemented by the FSA. The FSA has implemented the FCD by applying the sectoral rules of the largest sector, hence a group such as Prudential is classified as an insurance conglomerate and is required to focus on the capital adequacy requirements of the IGD, the Consolidated Life Directive and the Insurance Company Accounts Directive. The FCD requires a continuous parent company solvency test which requires the aggregating of surplus capital held in the regulated subsidiaries, from which Group borrowings are deducted, other than those subordinated debt issues which qualify as capital. No credit for the benefit of diversification is allowed for under this approach. The test is passed when this aggregate number is positive, and a negative result at any point in time is a notifiable breach of UK regulatory requirements. Due to the geographically diverse nature of Prudential’s operations, the application of these requirements to Prudential is complex. In particular, for many of our Asian operations, the assets, liabilities and capital requirements have to be recalculated based on FSA regulations as if the companies were directly subject to FSA regulation. The FCD position will be submitted to the FSA by 30 April 2007 but is currently estimated to be around £1.0 billion. A further gain of £0.3 billion is expected to arise in 2007 from the sale of Egg. The sale of Egg implies that Prudential may again be designated an ‘insurance group’ rather than its current treatment as a financial conglomerate, and thus will be required to meet the requirements of the IGD. This should not have a significant impact on the Group, as the FSA’s prudential requirements pertaining to insurance groups are very similar to those applying to insurance conglomerates, in particular because the FSA has decided to make the continuous parent solvency test mandatory from 31 December 2006 for all insurance groups. The European Commission is continuing to develop a new prudential framework for insurance companies, ‘the Solvency II project’ that will update the existing life, non-life and insurance groups directives. The main aim of this framework is to ensure the financial stability of the insurance industry and protect policyholders through establishing solvency requirements better matched to the true risks of the business. Like Basel 2, the new approach is expected to be based on the concept of three pillars – minimum capital requirements, supervisory review of firms’ assessments of risk and enhanced disclosure requirements. However, the scope is wider than Basel 2 and will cover valuations, the treatment of insurance groups, the definition of capital and the overall level of capital requirements. 48 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Directors’ report: Operating and financial review Other corporate information A key aspect of Solvency II is the focus on risks and, for example, capital requirements will be calibrated to a one year Value at Risk with a 99.5 per cent confidence level. Companies will be encouraged to improve their risk management processes and will be allowed to make use of internal economic capital models to enable a better understanding of risks. The emphasis on transparency and comparability would ensure a level playing field but not delivering this remains one of the key risks for the project. Prudential is actively engaged in policy discussions mainly through its participation in the Chief Risk Officer (CRO) Forum of major European insurance firms. Prudential has been emphasising the importance of level playing fields, in particular in connection with the treatment of operations outside the EU. The Commission intends to adopt proposals for a framework directive in mid-2007 which will contain high-level principles. These principles will be supplemented by implementing measures that will be adopted by the Commission and EU member states. Solvency II is then intended to be implemented around 2010. It is important that the EU policy makers keep up the progress to enable implementation by the suggested date. During 2006, the Committee of European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Supervisors (CEIOPS) invited EU insurance industry to participate in the second quantitative impact study, which provided useful input for supervisors and industry alike. The EU insurance industry will be participating in another quantitative impact study during the first half of 2007 with a view to provide quantitative input into the calibration of the capital requirements. Participation in these exercises involves a substantive commitment and is expected to yield benefits by providing evidence leading to a truly risk-based capital requirement. Financial strength of insurance operations United Kingdom The PAC’s long-term fund remains very strong. On a realistic valuation basis, with liabilities recorded on a market consistent basis, the free assets are valued at approximately £8.7 billion at 31 December 2006, before a deduction for the risk capital margin. The fund is rated AA+ by Standard & Poor’s, Aa1 by Moody’s and AA+ by Fitch Ratings. The with-profits sub-fund delivered a pre-tax return of 12.4 per cent in 2006, and over the last five years the fund has achieved a total return of 63.8 per cent against 41.1 per cent for the FTSE 100 total return and 50.2 per cent for the FTSE All-Share (Total Return) index (figures are to 31 December 2006, before tax and charges). Much of this excellent investment performance was achieved through the active asset allocation of the fund. As part of its asset allocation process, Prudential UK constantly evaluates prospects for different markets and asset classes. During the year, Prudential UK decreased its exposure to equities while increasing its exposure to corporate bonds and alternative assets, reflecting Prudential UK’s view that increased diversification in the assets of the with-profits sub-fund was appropriate. The table below shows the change in the investment mix of Prudential UK’s main with-profits fund: UK equities International equities Property Bonds Cash and other assets classes 2006 % 36 17 15 25 7 2005 % 40 19 15 21 5 2004 % 33 15 18 29 5 Total 100 100 100 United States The capital adequacy position of Jackson remains strong, having improved the capital ratio from 9.2 per cent in 2005 to 9.8 per cent in 2006. Jackson’s statutory capital, surplus and asset valuation reserve position improved year-on-year by US$193 million, after deducting the US$200 million of capital remitted to the parent company. Jackson’s financial strength is rated AA by Standard & Poor’s and A1 by Moody’s. Jackson’s invested asset mix on a US regulatory basis (excludes policy loans and reverse repo leverage) is as follows: Bonds: Investment Grade Public Investment Grade Private Non-Investment Grade Public Non-Investment Grade Private Commercial mortgages Private equities and real estate Equities, cash and other assets 2006 % 2005 % 2004 % 60 18 4 1 12 3 2 58 19 5 2 11 3 2 60 19 4 2 11 3 1 Total 100 100 100 Asia Prudential Corporation Asia maintains solvency margins in each of its operations so that these are at or above the local regulatory requirements. Across the region less than 40 per cent of non- linked funds are invested in equities. Both Singapore and Malaysia have discrete life funds, and have strong free asset ratios. The Hong Kong life operation is a branch of Prudential Assurance Company Limited and its solvency is covered by that business. Taiwan has Risk Based Capital regulatory solvency margins and Prudential ensures sufficient capital is retained in the business to cover these requirements. Redress of mortgage endowment products PAC’s main long-term business with-profits fund paid compensation of £11 million in 2006 in respect of mortgage endowment product mis-selling claims and held a provision of £60 million at 31 December 2006 to cover further claims. These compensation payments and provisions have had no impact on policyholders’ asset shares. As a result, policyholders’ bonuses and the shareholders’ share of these bonuses are unaffected, resulting in no impact on the Group’s profit before tax. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 49 Directors’ report: Operating and financial review Other corporate information Other corporate information continued A provision of £5 million was held at 31 December 2006 by shareholders’ funds to cover potential compensation in respect of mis-selling claims for Scottish Amicable mortgage endowment products sold since the acquisition of Scottish Amicable in 1997. In addition, a provision of £45 million was held at 31 December 2006 for the closed Scottish Amicable Insurance Fund (SAIF) in respect of mortgage endowment products sold prior to acquisition. This provision has no impact on shareholders. No further Scottish Amicable mortgage endowment products were sold after April 2001. In May 2006, the Group introduced a deadline for both Prudential and Scottish Amicable mortgage endowment complaints. Impacted customers have three years to lodge a mis-selling complaint in line with the time limit prescribed by the FSA and the ABI. Inherited estate of Prudential Assurance The assets of the main with-profits fund within the long-term insurance fund of PAC comprise the amounts that it expects to pay out to meet its obligations to existing policyholders and an additional amount used as working capital. The amount payable over time to policyholders from the with-profits fund is equal to the policyholders’ accumulated asset shares plus any additional payments that may be required by way of smoothing or to meet guarantees. The balance of the assets of the with-profits fund is called the ‘inherited estate’ and has accumulated over many years from various sources. The inherited estate represents the major part of the working capital of PAC’s long-term insurance fund. This enables PAC to support with-profits business by providing the benefits associated with smoothing and guarantees, by providing investment flexibility for the fund’s assets, by meeting the regulatory capital requirements that demonstrate solvency and by absorbing the costs of significant events or fundamental changes in its long-term business without affecting the bonus and investment policies. The size of the inherited estate fluctuates from year to year depending on the investment return and the extent to which it has been required to meet smoothing costs, guarantees and other events. PAC believes that it would be beneficial if there were greater clarity as to the status of the Inherited Estate. As a result, PAC has announced that it has begun a process to determine whether it can achieve that clarity through a reattribution of the inherited estate. As part of this process, a Policyholder Advocate has been nominated to represent policyholders’ interests. This nomination does not mean that a reattribution will occur. Given the size of the Group’s with-profits business any proposal is likely to be time consuming and complex to implement and is likely to involve a payment to policyholders from shareholders’ funds. If a reattribution is completed the inherited estate will continue to provide working capital for the long-term insurance fund. Defined benefit pension schemes The Group operates four defined benefit schemes, three in Prudential UK, of which the principal scheme is the Prudential Staff Pension Scheme (PSPS), and a small scheme in Taiwan. The level 50 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 of surplus or deficit of assets over liabilities for defined benefit schemes is currently measured in three ways: the actuarial valuation, FRS 17 (for subsidiary accounting in the UK) and IAS 19 for the Group financial statements. FRS 17 and IAS 19 are very similar. As at 31 December 2006, the shareholders’ share of the £65 million surplus for PSPS and the deficits of the other schemes amounted to an £8 million deficit net of related tax relief. Defined benefit schemes in Prudential UK are generally required to be subject to full actuarial valuation every three years to assess the appropriate level of funding for schemes having regard to their commitments. These valuations include assessments of the likely rate of return on the assets held within the separate trustee administered funds. PSPS was last actuarially valued as at 5 April 2005 and this valuation demonstrated the Scheme to be 94 per cent funded, with a shortfall of actuarially determined assets to liabilities of six per cent, representing a deficit of £243 million. The finalisation of the valuation as at 5 April 2005 was accompanied by changes to the basis of funding for the Scheme. For 2006 and future years, deficit funding amounts designed to eliminate the actuarial deficit over a 10-year period have been and are being made. Total contributions to the Scheme for deficit funding and employer’s contributions for ongoing service for current employees are expected to be of the order of £70-75 million per annum over a 10-year period. However, in 2006, total contributions, including amounts in arrears for the scheme year to 5 April 2006, were £137 million. Under IAS 19 the basis of valuation differs markedly from the full triennial valuation basis. In particular, it requires assets of the Scheme to be valued at their market value at the year end, while pension liabilities are required to be discounted at a rate consistent with the current rate of return on a high quality corporate bond. As a result, the difference between IAS 19 basis assets and liabilities can be volatile. For those schemes such as PSPS, which hold a substantial proportion of their assets in equity investments, the volatility can be particularly significant. For 2006, a £28 million pre-tax shareholder charge to operating results based on longer- term returns arises. In addition, outside the operating result, but included in total profits is a pre-tax shareholder credit of £167 for net actuarial gains. These gains primarily represent the difference between actual and expected investment returns for the schemes and the reduction in liabilities caused by an increase in the discount rate caused by increases in corporate bond returns. In 2006, the PSPS asset allocation was altered away from equity investments such that at 31 December 2006 the market value of equities for the Group’s defined benefit schemes represented 31 per cent (2005: 52 per cent) of the total asset value, whilst the bond portfolio accounted for 43 per cent (2005: 34 per cent). Surpluses and deficits on the Group’s defined benefit schemes are apportioned to the PAC life fund and shareholders’ funds based on estimates of employees’ service between them. At 31 December 2005, the deficit on the PSPS Scheme was apportioned in the ratio 70/30 between the life fund and shareholder-backed operations. This ratio was determined following extensive analysis of the source of the cumulative funding for the scheme to that date. This basis has been applied for 2006 to the assets and liability Directors’ report: Operating and financial review Other corporate information movements relating to the start position and also to the deficit funding paid in the year. However, the IAS 19 service cost for the year and employer contributions for ongoing service of current employees have been apportioned in the ratio relevant to current activity. At 31 December 2006, the total share of the surplus on PSPS and the deficit on the much smaller Scottish Amicable scheme attributable to the PAC life fund amounted to a net surplus of £66 million net of related tax relief. Products and drivers of insurance operations’ profits United Kingdom In common with other UK long-term insurance companies, Prudential UK’s products are structured as either with-profits (or participating) products, or non-participating products including annuities in payment and unit-linked products. Depending upon the structure, the level of shareholders’ interest in the value of policies and the related profit or loss varies. With-profits policies are supported by a with-profits sub-fund and can be single premium (for example, Prudence Bond) or regular premium (for example, certain corporate pension products). Prudential’s UK primary with-profits sub-fund is part of PAC’s long-term fund. The return to shareholders on virtually all with-profits products is in the form of a statutory transfer to PAC shareholders’ funds which is analogous to a dividend from PAC’s long-term fund and is dependent upon the bonuses credited or declared on policies in that year. There are two types of bonuses ‘annual’ and ‘final’. Annual bonuses are declared once a year, and once credited, are guaranteed in accordance with the terms of the particular product and are determined as a prudent proportion of the long-term expected future investment return on the underlying assets. ‘Final’ bonuses are only guaranteed until the next bonus declaration and are primarily determined on the actual smoothed investment return achieved over the life of the policy. Prudential’s UK with-profits policyholders currently receive 90 per cent of the distribution from the main with-profits sub-fund as bonus additions to their policies and shareholders receive 10 per cent as a statutory transfer. The defined charge participating sub-fund (DCPSF) forms part of the PAC long-term fund and comprises the accumulated investment content of premiums paid in respect of the defined charge participating with-profits business issued in France, and the defined charge participating with-profits business reassured into PAC from Prudential International Assurance plc and Canada Life (Europe) Assurance Ltd. All profits in this fund accrue to policyholders in the DCPSF. The profits from almost all of Prudential’s new non-participating business accrue solely to shareholders. Such business is written in the non-profit sub-fund within PAC’s long-term fund, or in various shareholder-owned direct or indirect subsidiaries, the most significant of which is Prudential Retirement Income Limited (PRIL), which also writes all new immediate annuities arising from vesting deferred annuity policies in the with-profits sub-fund of PAC. There is a substantial volume of in-force non-participating business in PAC’s with-profits sub-fund and that fund’s wholly-owned subsidiary Prudential Annuities Limited (PAL) which is closed to new business; profits from this business accrue to the with-profits sub-fund. United States Jackson’s principal retail savings products are sold as single premium fixed, variable or fixed index deferred annuities. Interest-sensitive fixed annuities are products which allow for tax-deferred accumulation of funds, with flexible payout options. They are used for asset accumulation in retirement planning and for providing income in retirement. The contractholder pays Jackson a premium, which is credited to the contractholder’s account. Periodically, interest is credited to the contractholder’s account and administrative charges are deducted, as appropriate. Jackson may reset the interest rate on each contract anniversary, subject to a guaranteed minimum, in line with state regulations. When the annuity matures, Jackson either pays the contractholder the amount in the contractholder account or begins making payments to the contractholder in the form of an immediate annuity product. This latter product is similar to a UK annuity in payment. Fixed annuity policies are subject to early surrender charges for the first six to nine years of the contract. In addition, the contract may be subject to a market value adjustment at the time of early surrender. During the surrender charge period, the contractholder may cancel the contract for the surrender value. Jackson’s profits on fixed annuities arise primarily from the spread between the return it earns on investments and the interest credited to the contractholder’s account (net of any surrender charges or market value adjustment) less expenses. Fixed index annuities (formerly referred to as equity-indexed annuities) are deferred annuities that allow for tax-deferred accumulation of funds, with flexible payout options. They are used for asset accumulation in retirement planning and for providing income in retirement. The contractholder pays Jackson a premium, which is credited to the contractholder’s account. Periodically, interest is credited to the contractholder’s account and administrative charges are deducted, as appropriate. Jackson guarantees an annual minimum interest rate, although actual interest credited may be higher and is linked to an equity index over its indexed option period. Jackson’s profit arises from the investment income earned and the fees charged on the contract, less the expenses incurred, which include the costs of the guarantees, and the interest credited to the contract. Fixed index annuities are subject to early surrender charges for the first five to 12 years of the contract. During the surrender charge period, the contractholder may cancel the contract for the surrender value. Variable annuities are tax-advantaged deferred annuities where the rate of return depends upon the performance of the underlying portfolio, similar in principle to UK unit-linked products. They are also used for asset accumulation in retirement planning and to provide income in retirement. The contractholder’s premiums are held apart from Jackson’s general account assets, in a separate account, which is analogous to a unit-linked fund. The contractholder can allocate the premiums between a variety of variable sub-accounts with a choice of fund managers and/or guaranteed fixed-rate options. The value of the portion of the separate account allocated to variable sub-accounts fluctuates with Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 51 Directors’ report: Operating and financial review Other corporate information Other corporate information continued the underlying investments. Variable annuity policies are subject to early surrender charges for the first three to six years of the contract. During the surrender charge period, the contractholder may cancel the contract for the surrender value. Jackson offers one variable annuity that has no early surrender charges. Jackson offers a choice of guaranteed benefit options within its variable annuity product portfolio which customers can elect and pay for. These include the guaranteed minimum death benefit (GMDB), which guarantees on death the contractholder receives a minimum value regardless of past market performance. These guaranteed death benefits might be expressed as the return of original premium, the highest past anniversary value of the contract, or as the original premium accumulated at a fixed rate of interest. In addition, there are two other types of guarantee, guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefits (GMWB) and guaranteed minimum income benefits (GMIB). GMWBs provide a guaranteed return of the principal invested by allowing for periodic withdrawals which are limited to a maximum percentage of the initial premium. One version of the GMWBs provides for a minimum annual withdrawal amount that is guaranteed for the contractholder’s life without annuitisation. GMIBs provide for a minimum level of benefits upon annuitisation regardless of the value of the investments underlying the contract at the time of annuitisation. The GMIB is reinsured. As the investment return on the separate account assets is attributed directly to the contractholders, Jackson’s profit arises from the fees charged on the contracts, less the expenses incurred, which include the costs of guarantees. Jackson also sells several types of life insurance including term life, universal life, survivorship universal life, and variable universal life. Term life provides protection for a defined period of time and a benefit that is payable to a designated beneficiary upon death of the insured. Universal life provides permanent individual life insurance for the life of the insured and includes a savings element. Survivorship universal life is a form of permanent life insurance that insures two people and pays the policy benefits after the death of the last surviving insured. Variable universal life is a life insurance policy that combines death benefit protection and the important tax advantages of life insurance with the long- term growth potential of professionally managed investments. Asia The life insurance products offered by Prudential Corporation Asia include a range of with-profits (participating) and non-participating term, whole life and endowment and unit-linked policies. Prudential also offers health, disablement, critical illness and accident cover to supplement its core life products. Prudential’s business in Asia is focused on regular premium products that provide both savings and protection benefits. In 2006, the new business profit mix was 60 per cent unit-linked, 18 per cent non-linked and 22 per cent A&H products. Unit-linked products combine savings with protection and the cash value of the policy depends on the value of the underlying unitised funds. Participating products provide savings with protection 52 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 where the basic sum assured can be enhanced by a profit share (or bonus) from the underlying fund as determined at the discretion of the insurer. Non-participating products offer savings with protection where the benefits are guaranteed or determined by a set of defined market related parameters. A&H products provide mortality or morbidity benefits and include health, disablement, critical illness and accident covers. A&H products are commonly offered as supplements to main life policies but can also be sold separately. The profits from participating policies are shared between the policyholder and insurer (typically in a 90:10 ratio) in the same way as with-profits business in the UK. Under unit-linked products the profits that arise from managing the policy, its investments and the insurance risk accrue entirely to shareholders, with investment gains accruing to the policyholder within the underlying unitised fund. The profits from A&H and non-participating products consist of any surplus remaining after paying policy benefits. Unit-linked products tend to have higher profits on the EEV basis of reporting than traditional non-linked products as expenses and charges are better matched and solvency capital requirements are lower. At the end of 2006, Prudential Corporation Asia offered unit-linked products in 10 of the 12 countries in Asia in which it operates. In addition to the life products described above, Prudential offers mutual fund investment products in India, Taiwan, Japan, Singapore, Malaysia, Hong Kong, Korea, Vietnam and China, allowing customers to participate in debt, equity and money market investments. It is also licensed in UAE. Prudential Corporation Asia earns a fee based on assets under management. Description of EEV basis reporting Prudential’s results are prepared on two bases of accounting, the supplementary EEV basis and the IFRS basis for the financial statements. Over the life of any given product, the total profit recognised will be the same under either the IFRS or the EEV basis. However, the two methods recognise the emergence of that profit differently, with profits emerging earlier under the EEV basis than under IFRS. This section explains how EEV differs from IFRS and why it is used. In broad terms, IFRS profits for long-term business reflect the aggregate of statutory transfers from with-profits funds and profit on a traditional accounting basis for other long-term business. The IFRS result, however, does not reflect the long-term benefits that arise in the future from current management initiatives and capital expenditure in the year under review, as it focuses instead on the amounts accruing to shareholders in the current year only from business already in force. The products sold by the life insurance industry are by their nature long-term, as it commits to service the products for many years into the future. The profit on these insurance sales is generated over a significant number of years and IFRS basis profits do not, in Prudential’s opinion, properly reflect the inherent value of these future profit streams. Directors’ report: Operating and financial review Other corporate information From 1997, Prudential and other major UK quoted financial groups adopted the achieved profits basis, a form of embedded value reporting, as a supplementary accounting measure in order to give a better reflection of the value attaching to the long-term insurance business and the current performance. changes in economic assumptions, the time value of the cost of options and guarantees and other short-term volatilities caused through market movements; other items (for example, profit from other Group operations, tax, and the effect of exchange movements); and dividends. In May 2004, the CFO Forum, representing the Chief Financial Officers of 19 European insurers, published the European Embedded Value Principles (Principles) which are designed to improve the transparency and consistency of embedded value reporting. Member companies, of which Prudential is one, agreed to adopt the Principles for supplementary reporting no later than the financial year end commencing 1 January 2005. Prudential fully adopted the Principles for the first time in respect of full-year 2005 results. For Prudential, EEV reporting represents an evolution from achieved profits reporting and it welcomes the improved clarity and consistency of information that it provides to investors although there is still some way to go before achieving full consistency. Compared to achieved profits, the principal differences are in respect of three areas: • inclusion of an explicit allowance for the impact of options and guarantees. This typically requires stochastic calculations, under which a large number of simulations are performed that provide a representation of the future behaviour of financial markets; • more active allowance for the combined impact of risk profile and encumbered capital in the selection of discount rates. This ensures that the risks to the emergence of shareholder cash flows are properly accounted for; and • enhanced disclosure that enables informed investors to understand better the key risks within the business and the basis of preparation of the results. The EEV basis not only provides a good indicator of the value being added by management in a given accounting period but it also demonstrates whether shareholder capital is being deployed to best effect. Indeed, insurance companies in many countries use comparable bases of accounting for management purposes. The EEV basis is a value based method of reporting in that it reflects the change in value of the business over the accounting period. This value is called the shareholders’ funds on the EEV basis which, at a given point in time, is the value of future cash flows expected to arise from the current book of long-term insurance business plus the net worth of the Company. In determining these expected cash earnings, Prudential makes full allowance for the risks attached to their emergence and the associated cost of capital and takes into account recent experience in assessing likely future persistency, mortality and expenses. The value added from new business (being the present value of the future cash flows arising from new business written in the year) is a key metric used in the management of the business. The change in value of business in force at the start of the year demonstrates how the existing book is being managed. Together they provide management and shareholders with valuable information about the underlying development of the business and the success or otherwise of management actions. EEV basis results are prepared by first of all setting best estimate assumptions, by product, for all relevant factors including levels of future investment returns, expenses, surrender levels and mortality. These assumptions are used to project future cash flows. The present value of the future cash flows is then calculated using a discount rate which reflects both the time value of money and the risks associated with the cash flows. The risk discount rate is determined by adding a risk margin to the appropriate risk free rate of return. The actual outcome may be different from that projected in which case the effect will be reflected in the experience variances for that year. The assumptions used for the EEV basis of accounting are set out on pages 260 to 264 in the notes that accompany the supplementary EEV basis information. An indication of the sensitivity of the results to changes in key assumptions is provided on pages 278 to 280. The EEV basis can be illustrated by considering a theoretical individual contract. Using assumptions for the drivers of future income and expenditure, a profile of future cash flows can be estimated. These cash flows are then discounted back to the point of sale to give a new business profit. The EEV basis profits emerging in each subsequent accounting period will comprise the unwinding of the discount (which arises from discounting future cash flows for one fewer period) and the profit or loss arising from any difference between the actual and expected experience, together with the effect of any changes of assumption where the directors believe a revision is required to the original estimates of future experience. Post-balance sheet events Important events affecting the Company after the end of the financial year are detailed in note I8 on page 239. Payment policy Economic assumptions as to future investment returns and inflation are based on market data. The change in value is typically analysed into the following components: the value added from new business sold during the year; the change in value from existing business already in place at the start of the year; short-term fluctuations in investment returns; the effect of It is the policy of the Group to agree terms of payment when orders for goods and services are placed and to pay in accordance with those terms. Trade creditor days, based on the ratio of amounts which were owed to trade creditors at the year end to the aggregate of the amounts invoiced by trade creditors during the year, were 22 days. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 53 Directors’ report: Operating and financial review Risk management Risk management Principles As a provider of financial services, including insurance, the Group’s business is the managed acceptance of risk. Prudential believes that effective risk management capabilities are a key competitive advantage and a strategic risk, capital and value management framework and risk management culture has been developed to enhance the Group’s embedded and franchise value. Risk is defined as the uncertainty that Prudential faces in successfully implementing its strategies and objectives. This includes all internal or external events, acts or omissions that have the potential to threaten the success and survival of Prudential. Risk is not only regarded as harmful, but is also considered in relation to achieving profitable returns through controlled risk taking. The control procedures and systems the Group has established are designed to manage, rather than eliminate, the risk of failure to meet business objectives and can only provide reasonable and not absolute assurance against material mis-statement or loss, and focus on aligning the levels of risk taking with the achievement of business objectives. The Group’s policy is to proactively identify, evaluate, and manage risk. This forms an essential element of delivering the Group’s performance ambition. In so doing, material risks will only be retained where this is consistent with Prudential’s risk appetite framework, i.e.: • the retention of the risk contributes to value creation; • the Group is able to withstand the impact of an adverse outcome; and • the Group has the necessary capabilities, expertise, processes and controls to manage the risk. A common risk language is used across the Group which allows meaningful comparisons to be made between different business units. Risks are broadly categorised as shown in Table 1. Risk governance Governance structure Prudential’s risk governance framework requires that all of the Group’s businesses and functions establish processes for identifying, evaluating and managing the key risks faced by the Group. The risk governance framework is based on the concept of ‘three lines of defence’: Risk Management, Risk Oversight and Independent Assurance (see diagram opposite). 1. Risk management: primarily responsible for strategy, performance management and risk control lies with the Board, the Group Chief Executive Officer and the chief executives of each business unit. 2. Risk oversight: risk management oversight is provided by Group-level risk committees, Group Chief Risk Officer (Group CRO) and Group Risk Function working with counterparts in the business units in addition to other functions, including Group Compliance and Group Security. 3. Independent assurance: independent assurance on the effectiveness of the Group’s and business unit control and risk management systems is provided by Internal Audit reporting to the Group and business unit audit committees. The risk management roles and responsibilities of the various management bodies and committees are described below: Risk categorisation Category Risk type Financial risks Market risk Credit risk Insurance risk Liquidity risk Non-financial risks Operational risk Definition The risk that arises from adverse changes in the value of, or income from, assets and changes in interest rates or exchange rates. The risk of loss if another party fails to perform its obligations, or fails to perform them in a timely fashion. The inherent uncertainty as to the occurrence, amount and timing of insurance liabilities. This includes adverse mortality, morbidity and persistency experience. The risk that a business, though solvent, either does not have the financial resources to meet its obligations as they fall due or can secure the resources only at excessive cost. The risk of direct or indirect loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people or systems, or from external events. Business environment risk Exposure to forces in the external environment that could significantly change the fundamentals that drive the business’s overall objectives and strategy. Strategic risk Regulatory compliance risk Ineffective, inefficient or inadequate senior management processes for the development and implementation of business strategy in relation to the business environment and the Group’s capabilities. The risk caused by changes in the compliance/regulatory environments for financial services products or failure to understand or effectively apply and comply with compliance/regulatory standards, principles and practices. 54 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Directors’ report: Operating and financial review Risk management Risk Governance Framework Risk Management Risk Oversight Independent Assurance Prudential plc Board Group Chief Executive Group Executive Committee Group Asset Liability Committee Group Audit Committee Business unit chief executives Group Chief Risk Officer Group Operational Risk Committee Group Risk Function Business unit risk functions Group-wide Internal Audit ■ Board/board committees ■ Personnel ■ Functions ■ Management committees –– Direct reporting line Provides support to committees Board The Board has overall responsibility for the system of internal control and risk management. In order to fulfil this responsibility, the Board: • determines (on advice from the Group Chief Executive) the amount and type of risk that the Group is prepared to accept, ensures the formulation of adequate risk management strategies and approves the overall framework for managing the risks faced by the Group; • seeks regular assurance, supported by the Group Audit Committee (GAC), that the system of controls is functioning effectively, and that the Group’s system of internal control is managing risk in the manner that it has approved; and • delegates authority (where necessary), via the Group Chief Executive, to the Group Executive Committee (GEC) and Group-level risk committees, as well as to senior management within the Group and business units. Group level management Group executive management (Group Chief Executive and GEC): the Group Chief Executive has overall responsibility for the risks facing the Group. The Group Chief Executive recommends to the Board the amount and type of risk that the Group is prepared to accept, and recommends risk management strategies as well as an overall framework for managing the risks faced by the Group (with support from the GEC, Group CRO and Group level risk committees). The Group Chief Executive provides regular updates to the Board on the risk position and risk policy. Group Chief Risk Officer: the Group CRO is responsible for providing risk management oversight for the Group. The Group CRO oversees Group Risk, Group Compliance, Group Security and, for management purposes only, the Group-wide Internal Audit function. The Group CRO is a member of the GEC and chairs the Group-level risk committees. Group level risk committees Group Asset Liability Committee (Group ALCO): responsible for oversight of financial risks (market, credit, liquidity and insurance risks) across the Group. It is chaired by the Group CRO and its membership includes senior business unit and Group executives (chief actuaries, principal ALM officers and chief investment officers) who are involved in the management of the aforementioned risks. The Group ALCO is supported by Group Risk. Group Operational Risk Committee (GORC): responsible for the oversight of non-financial risks (operational, business environment, regulatory compliance and strategic risks) across the Group. Responsibilities include monitoring operational risk and related policies and processes as they are applied throughout the Group. It is chaired by the Group CRO and its membership includes senior representatives of the business unit and Group Risk functions. The GORC is supported by Group Risk. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 55 Directors’ report: Operating and financial review Risk management Risk management continued Group Risk function The Group Risk function is a Group Head Office (GHO) oversight function that is structured independently of the business units. The purpose of the Group Risk department is to establish and embed a strategic risk, capital and value management framework and risk management culture consistent with Prudential’s risk appetite that protects and enhances the Group’s embedded and franchise value. Group Risk, under the guidance of the Group CRO, is also responsible for the continued development and expansion of the Risk Management Framework. Group Risk is responsible for establishing and maintaining the risk management agenda across the Group by: 1. Risk framework: Establishing structures and capabilities through designing, implementing and maintaining a consistent and harmonised risk management framework and policies spanning Economic, Regulatory and Rating Agency Capital, Risk Appetite and Risk-adjusted Profitability. 2. Risk monitoring: Establishing a ‘no surprises’ risk management culture accomplished by identifying the risk landscape, assessing and monitoring risk exposures and understanding change drivers. 3. Risk controlling: Implementing risk mitigation strategies and remedial actions where exposures are deemed inappropriate and managing the response to extreme events. 4. Risk communication: Communicating the Group risk, capital and profitability position to internal and external stakeholders and other commentators. 5. Risk culture: Fostering a risk management culture, providing quality assurance and facilitating the sharing of best practice risk measurement and management across the Group and industry. Group Risk acts as secretariat and adviser to the Group ALCO and GORC. In addition to the above primary responsibilities, Group Risk is also responsible for: • Group Insurance Risk Management (GIRM): procures and manages Group-wide insurance programmes; • Regulatory Developments: leads the Group’s response to regulatory and industry developments such as Solvency II; and • Actuarial Support: Group Risk provides actuarial support and oversight to the business unit and Group functions for regulatory and accounting measures (EEV, IFRS and US GAAP). Business unit management The business unit chief executives are accountable for the implementation and operation of an appropriate business unit risk framework and for ensuring compliance with the policy and minimum standards set by the Group. As the first line of defence, business units are responsible for identifying and managing business unit risks and providing regular risk reporting to the Group. 56 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Business units undertake risk self-assessments in accordance with the Group Risk Framework, with dedicated risk functions, risk committees (comprising business unit asset-liability committees and operational risk committees) and named individuals responsible for the operation of the Group Risk Framework in each business unit. Business unit risk functions report directly to the respective business unit chief executives who in turn are members of the GEC and report to the Group Chief Executive. Internal audit Group Audit Committee: the GAC provides independent assurance to the Board on the effectiveness of the Group’s system of internal controls and risk management. The GAC reviews the Group’s risk management framework, and regular risk reports. The GAC is supported by Group-wide Internal Audit. Group-wide Internal Audit (GwIA): the GwIA function independently assures the effective operation of the Group’s risk management framework across the Group. This involves the validation of methodology application, policy compliance and control adequacy. The GwIA Director reports all audit related matters to the GAC and reports for management purposes (but not audit related matters) to the Group CRO. Risk reporting The Group Risk function develops and maintains a process for the regular, systematic identification, measurement, monitoring and management of business unit and GHO risk exposures. The Group’s risk reporting framework forms an important part of the Group’s business planning process. As part of the annual preparation of its business plan, all of the Group’s businesses and functions are required to carry out a review of risks. This involves an assessment of the impact and likelihood of key risks and of the effectiveness of controls in place to manage them, and is reviewed regularly throughout the year. In addition, business units review opportunities and risks to business objectives regularly with the Group Chief Executive, the Group Finance Director and the Group CRO. Quarterly risk reports from the business units and Group are reported to Group Risk and the Group-level risk committees covering risks of Group significance. Regular reports are also made to Group and business unit audit committees by management, internal audit, compliance and legal functions. The Board is provided with regular updates on the Group’s economic capital position, risk appetite position and risk-adjusted profitability as part of the overall risk framework. This provides a top down overview of the Group’s risk profile measured on a consistent and economic basis. The insurance operations of the Group all prepare an annual financial condition report, which is reported on to the Board. The financial condition reports include an assessment of key risks affecting the business unit. The impact of large transactions or divergences from business plan is investigated by Group Risk as and when they are proposed, by Directors’ report: Operating and financial review Risk management considering the potential impacts on relevant risk reporting metrics (e.g. risk appetite position). New risk management initiatives such as new control frameworks and mitigation strategies are reported to the GEC while they are being developed. Policies and procedures The Group’s internal control processes, including risk management, are detailed in the Group Governance Manual. Detailed policies and procedures exist (at both the Group and business unit levels) covering risk, finance, legal, compliance, security, technology, audit, human resources and communications. The policy framework includes the following items (amongst others) of particular relevance to risk management: • the Group-wide policy on risk management (covering financial and non-financial risks) is detailed in the Group Risk Framework, which is maintained by Group Risk; • investment management policies for each business unit mandate are set out in Investment Management Agreements between the relevant business units and fund managers; • financial control policies (including financial reporting and business planning) are set out in business unit Financial Procedures Manuals; and • policies for all aspects of actuarial management (including regulatory reporting and asset liability management) are set out in business unit Actuarial Procedures Manuals. Group Security maintains detailed procedures to mitigate certain operational risks, including: fraud, money laundering, bribery, business continuity, information security and operational security. The Group prepares an annual business plan with three-year projections. Executive management and the Board receive monthly reports on the financial position of the Group and actual performance against plan, together with updated forecasts. All senior management committees within the Group and business units have clearly documented terms of references. Risk management Risk limits Group Risk Appetite The Group Risk Appetite framework sets out the Group’s tolerance to risk exposures, approach to risk/return optimisation and management of risk. The Board and GEC have set up Group-level risk appetite statements concerning the key risk exposures faced by the Group. The Group Risk Appetite statements set out the Group’s risk tolerance, or risk appetite, to ‘shocks’ to the key financial risk exposures (market, credit and insurance risk). In order to determine its risk appetite position, each business unit calculates the impacts (on earnings ‘flow’ and capital ‘stock’ measures) of a shock to market, credit and insurance risk exposures. The market and credit risk shocks include: parallel movements in interest rates, falls in equities, falls in property, changes in credit spreads and increases in credit losses. The insurance risk shocks include changes in assumptions for longevity, mortality, persistency and expenses. The Group Risk Appetite statements are defined in terms of earnings volatility and capital requirements, as follows: • Earnings volatility: The objectives of the limits are to ensure that (a) the volatility of earnings is consistent with stakeholder expectations, (b) the Group has adequate earnings (and cash flows) to service debt and expected dividends and (c) that earnings (and cash flows) are managed properly across geographies and are consistent with the Group’s funding strategies. The risk appetite statements for earnings volatility are defined in terms of two measures: EEV operating profit and IFRS operating profit; and Group Risk Appetite Framework Earnings measures (flow) IFRS EEV Capital measures (stock) Economic Regulatory (local/FCD) Business as usual Maintain target EEV operating profit Maintain target IFRS operating profit Earnings stress No large unexpected falls in EEV operating profit No large unexpected falls in IFRS operating profit Business as usual Capital stress Maintain target level of capitalisation Individual tail events should not significantly reduce financial resources Remain above minimum capitalisation Maintain suitable margin above Group solvency requirement over planning horizon Meet Group solvency requirement and hold sufficient resources to pay dividends and fund new business Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 57 Directors’ report: Operating and financial review Risk management Risk management continued • Capital requirements: The objectives of the limits are to ensure that (a) the Group is economically solvent, (b) the Group achieves its desired target rating to meet its business objectives, (c) supervisory intervention is avoided, (d) any potential capital strains are identified, and (e) accessible capital is available to meet business objectives. The risk appetite statements for capital are defined in terms of two measures: EU Financial Conglomerates Directive (FCD) capital requirements and Economic capital requirements. Risk appetite is part of the annual business planning cycle and the risk profile of the Group is monitored against the agreed limits throughout the year by Group Risk. Using submissions from business units, Group Risk calculates the Group’s position (allowing for diversification effects between business units) relative to the limits implied by the statements. A two-tier approach is used to apply the limits at business unit level. Firstly, indicative business unit risk limits are calculated; these ensure that, if each business unit keeps within its limits, the Group risk position would be within the Group limits. Secondly, the impact on the Group Risk Appetite position is considered as part of Group Risk’s scrutiny of large transactions or departures from plan proposed by individual business units. Any potential breaches of the Group Risk Appetite limits implied by a business unit plan will necessitate a dialogue process between GHO and the business units. Group-wide limits may not be breached if, for example, limits in other business units are not fully utilised, or the diversification effect at Group level of a particular risk with other business units means that the Group limit is not breached. Ultimately, authorisation to breach Group limits would require GEC approval. Group counterparty exposure limits In addition to business unit operational limits on credit risk, counterparty risk limits are also set at the Group level. Limits on total Group-wide exposures to a single counterparty are specified for different credit rating ‘buckets’. Actual exposures are monitored against these limits on a quarterly basis. Risk mitigation Prudential employs a range of risk mitigation strategies aimed at reducing the impact of a variety of risks. Key mitigation strategies include: adjustment of asset portfolios to reduce investment risks (such as duration mismatches or overweight counterparty exposures), use of derivatives to hedge market risks, reinsurance programmes to limit insurance risk, and corporate insurance programmes to limit impact of operational risks. Revisions to business plans (such as reassessment of bonus rates on participating business and scaling back of target new business volumes) may be also be used as a mitigating strategy. Primary responsibility for identifying and implementing controls and mitigation strategies rests with the business units. Group Risk provides oversight and advice to the mitigation process. The 58 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 quarterly risk reporting by business units to Group Risk includes details of the controls and mitigating actions being employed for each key risk (along with an assessment of the effectiveness of each control). Any mitigation strategies involving large transactions (e.g. a material derivative transaction) would be subject to scrutiny at Group level before implementation. Contingency plans are in place for a range of operational risk scenarios, including incident management and business continuity plans. As a contingency plan for liquidity risk, the Group has arranged access to committed revolving credit facilities and committed securities lending facilities. Asset liability management Prudential manages its assets and liabilities locally, in accordance with local regulatory requirements and reflecting the different types of liabilities of each business unit. Stochastic asset/liability modelling is carried out locally in the UK, the US and Asia to perform dynamic solvency testing and assess economic capital requirements. Reserve adequacy testing under a range of scenarios is also carried out, including scenarios prescribed by local regulatory bodies. The investment strategy for assets held to back liabilities is set locally by business units, taking into account the nature, term and currency of the liabilities, and any local regulatory requirements. The main principles are as follows: • for liabilities that are sensitive to interest rate movements (in particular, UK non-profit annuities and Jackson fixed annuities), cash flow analysis is used to construct a portfolio of fixed income securities whose value changes in line with the value of liabilities when interest rates change; • for participating business (in particular, the UK with-profits fund), stochastic asset-liability modelling is used to derive a strategic asset allocation and policyholder bonus strategy that (based on the model assumptions) will optimise policyholder and shareholder returns, while maintaining financial strength. The bonus strategy on participating business is an integral part of the asset-liability management approach for participating business; and • for unit-linked business, the assets held to cover policyholder unit accounts are invested as per the stated investment strategy or benchmark index given in the product marketing literature. Assets in respect of non-unit reserves (e.g. sterling reserves) are invested in fixed income securities (using a cash flow matching analysis). Derivative hedging strategies are also used on a controlled basis across the Group to manage exposure to market risks. Surplus assets held centrally are predominantly invested in short-term fixed income securities. The Group’s central treasury function, which is run by Prudential Finance, actively manages the surplus assets to maximise returns, subject to maintaining an acceptable degree of liquidity. Directors’ report: Operating and financial review Risk management Economic capital Overview Economic capital provides a realistic and consistent view of Prudential’s capital requirements across the Group, allowing for diversification benefits. Economic capital provides valuable insights into the risk profile of the Group and is an integral part of the Group’s risk management framework. The Group distinguishes between two distinct types of ’economic capital’ approaches. These are: • Group Economic Capital: Prudential’s Group economic capital is calculated using an integrated model of Group-wide risk, capturing dependencies and diversification benefits between different business units and risk categories. The capital requirement is determined based on a multi-year projection, thus taking into account the long-term nature of Prudential’s liabilities; and • 1-year Value at Risk Capital (1yr VaR Capital): 1yr VaR Capital is defined as the capital required to withstand a maximum loss over a time period of one year consistent with a confidence level of 99.5 per cent. This measure was developed internally as part of Prudential’s Risk-adjusted Profitability (RAP) approach to risk/return optimisation within the Group Risk Appetite framework. This measure captures the risk arising from individual risk types, and generally allows for diversification by using a correlation matrix approach. The methodology is continually being developed and improved. In addition to its risk management applications, the 1yr VaR Capital framework is used for Individual Capital Assessments (ICAS) in the UK and anticipated to form the basis of Prudential’s capital modelling for future regulatory reporting developments, such as Solvency II. These measures provide a consistent basis for comparing the risk profiles and capital requirements of different business units. The Group economic capital position and risk profile is reported to the Board annually, with more frequent updates on an ad hoc basis. Group Risk is responsible for developing and maintaining the economic capital models, and for calculating the Group economic capital position. Group economic capital methodology Prudential’s internal Group economic capital requirement is defined as the minimum amount of capital that the Group needs to hold in order to remain economically solvent over a 25-year horizon, given a target probability of insolvency appropriate for AA-rated debt. The target confidence level is based on historic default rates for AA-rated debt, and varies over the time horizon of the projection. The economic capital requirement is calculated in respect of existing contractual and discretionary liabilities only. For the purposes of calculating Group economic capital, Group ‘economic solvency’ is defined as the position where both: (a) the capital balance of the parent company is positive, and (b) all business units are solvent on the applicable local regulatory basis. This definition of solvency allows the Group’s capital position to be assessed on an economic basis while taking into account the actual regulatory constraints at the business unit level. The Group economic capital position is calculated using the Group Solvency Model (GSM) – an integrated stochastic asset/liability model of the Group economic solvency position. Projected economic scenarios in the GSM are generated using a stochastic economic scenario generator that captures all the correlations between different asset classes and geographies. Group economic capital results As at 31 December 2005, the Group economic capital requirement was £1.7 billion, compared to available capital resources of £4.1 billion. The Group economic capital requirement quoted is after allowance for diversification benefits between risk types and business units, and inclusive of the local regulatory capital requirements at the business unit level. The economic capital requirement is calculated for in-force liabilities only, excluding the impact of future new business and dividend distributions. Group Economic Capital Position £m Group Capital Position at year end 2005 AA basis Group Capital Position at year end 2004 AA basis 4,114 2,395 1,719 4,500 4,000 3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 4,500 4,000 3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 3,418 1,584 1,834 Available capital Required capital Capital surplus Available capital Required capital Capital surplus Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 59 Directors’ report: Operating and financial review Risk management Risk management continued Note that the economic capital surplus of £2.4 billion quoted above excludes any surplus in respect of the Group’s participating with-profits funds. For Group economic capital, it is assumed that any free assets in participating funds are ring-fenced to support the relevant fund (and excluded from the Group’s economic surplus). Any capital injections required by participating funds (on top of the ring-fenced free assets) are captured in the Group economic capital requirement calculation. For year end 2005, none of the Group’s participating funds required additional economic capital on top of the ring-fenced free assets. The allocation of economic capital (diversified) by risk type is shown below. The largest risk exposure is credit risk, which reflects the relative size of the exposure in Jackson, Prudential UK and Egg. The ALM risk exposure mainly reflects interest rate risk in Jackson and Taiwan. An increasingly significant component of the underwriting risk is attributable to longevity risk, which has increased due to the growth in annuity business being written in the UK shareholder fund. The standalone economic capital for Operational Risk has been relatively stable. The reason for the proportional increase shown above is that the other risk capital requirements have decreased in absolute terms, rather than a significant increase in Operational Risk from the 2004 year-end level. Scenario testing The impact of a range of deterministic ‘shock’ scenarios is tested using the Group economic capital model. The purpose is to assess the resilience of the Group’s economic solvency position to a range of key threat scenarios. For the year-end 2005, economic capital scenarios relating to stable, falling and rising interest rates were tested. In addition, scenarios proposed by the 2006 Financial Risk Outlook, as published by the FSA, were tested. The scenarios related to high oil prices, lower consumption and US dollar depreciation, and were considered individually and in combination. Finally, the potential expected effect of a pandemic on the Group was analysed. The impact of each scenario was tested by analysing the projected Group cash flow balances over 25 years. The results of the analysis showed that the projected net cash flow balance to the Group remains positive in all future years under each scenario tested. Business unit local economic capital assessments In addition to Group-level economic capital framework described above, business units also monitor their own economic capital requirements locally on a ‘stand alone’ basis (without allowance for diversification effects with the rest of the Group). The business unit economic capital assessments are reported regularly and included in the business unit financial condition reports. The business unit economic capital assessments allow management to put the local regulatory capital requirements into an economic context. Economic Capital Requirement split by business unit Risk exposure at year end 2005 AA basis Risk exposure at year end 2004 AA basis 17 6 2 5 4 3 1 UK with-profits 0% 2 UK shareholder 25% 3 Jackson 46% 4 Prudential Corporation Asia 12% 5 M&G 4% 6 Egg 12% 7 GHO 1% 17 6 5 4 2 3 1 UK with-profits 0% 2 UK shareholder 19% 3 Jackson 46% 4 Prudential Corporation Asia 16% 5 M&G 5% 6 Egg 12% 7 GHO 1% Economic Capital Requirement split by risk type Risk exposure at year end 2005 AA basis Risk exposure at year end 2004 AA basis 5 1 4 3 1 ALM 21% 2 Credit 48% 3 Underwriting 13% 4 Persistency 1% 5 Operational 18% 5 4 3 1 1 ALM 28% 2 Credit 47% 3 Underwriting 10% 4 Persistency 2% 5 Operational 13% 2 2 60 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Directors’ report: Operating and financial review Risk management Market risk Market risk is the risk of adverse financial impact due to changes in fair values of financial instruments from fluctuations in asset prices, foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. Market risk arises in business units due to fluctuations in the value of liabilities and the value of investments held. Prudential’s businesses are inherently subject to market fluctuations and general economic conditions. In the UK, this is because a significant part of Prudential’s shareholders’ profit is related to bonuses for policyholders declared on its with-profits products, which are broadly based on historic and current rates of return on equity, real estate and fixed income securities, as well as Prudential’s expectations of future investment returns. In the US, fluctuations in prevailing interest rates can affect results from Jackson, where the majority of its assets are invested in fixed income securities. In particular, fixed annuities and stable value products in Jackson expose the Group to the risk that changes in interest rates which are not fully reflected in the interest rates credited to customers will reduce earned spread. The earned spread is the difference between the amounts that Jackson is required to pay under the contracts and the rate of return it is able to earn on its general account investments to support the obligations under the contracts. Declines in spread from these products or other spread businesses that Jackson conducts could have a material impact on its profitability and solvency. For some non-linked investment products, in particular those written in some of the Group’s Asian operations, it may not be possible to hold assets which will provide cash flows to exactly match those relating to policyholder liabilities. This is particularly true in those countries where bond markets are not developed and in certain markets, such as Taiwan, where regulated surrender values are set with reference to the interest rate environment prevailing at time of policy issue. This is due to the duration and uncertainty of the liability cash flows and the lack of sufficient assets of a suitable duration. This results in a residual asset-liability mismatch risk which can be managed but not eliminated. Where interest rates in these markets remain lower than those implied by surrender values over a sustained period this could have an adverse impact on the Group’s reported profit. The management of market risk is undertaken at both business unit and Group level. Business units manage market risks locally using their local ALM frameworks and business unit ALCOs, and within local regulatory constraints. Business units may also be constrained by the requirement to meet policyholders’ reasonable expectations and to minimise or avoid market risk in a number of areas. At Group level, market risk is the responsibility of the Group ALCO, which has a remit to manage a number of investment related risks, in particular those faced by the shareholder funds throughout the Group. For each of the major components of market risk, described in more detail below, Prudential has put in place policies and procedures to set out how each risk should be managed and monitored, and the approach to setting an appropriate risk appetite. Currency risk Prudential currently operates in the UK, the US, 12 countries in Asia (including Taiwan, South Korea, Japan, Taiwan and China) and Europe. Due to the geographical diversity of Prudential’s businesses, it is subject to the risk of exchange rate fluctuations. Prudential’s international operations in the US and Asia, which represent a significant proportion of operating profit and shareholders’ funds, generally write policies and invest in assets denominated in local currency. Although this practice limits the effect of exchange rate fluctuations on local operating results, it can lead to significant fluctuations in Prudential’s consolidated financial statements upon translation of results into pounds sterling. The currency exposure relating to the translation of reported earnings is not separately managed. Consequently, this could impact on the Group’s gearing ratios (defined as debt over debt plus shareholders’ funds). The impact of gains or losses on currency translations is recorded as a component of shareholders’ funds within the statement of changes in equity. Prudential does not generally seek to hedge foreign currency revenues, as these are substantially retained locally to support the growth of the Group’s business and meet local regulatory and market requirements. However, where foreign surplus is deemed to be supporting UK capital or shareholders’ interests this exposure is hedged if it is deemed optimal from an economic perspective. Currency borrowings and derivatives are used to manage exposures within the limits that have been set. Interest rate risk Interest rate risk arises primarily from Prudential’s investments in long-term debt and fixed income securities. Interest rate risk also exists in policies that carry investment guarantees on early surrender or at maturity, where claim values can become higher than the value of backing assets when interest rates rise or fall. The Group manages this risk by adopting close asset-liability matching criteria, to minimise the impact of mismatches between the value of assets and liabilities from interest rate movements. Interest rate risk is also controlled through the use of a variety of derivative instruments, including futures, options and swaps, in order to hedge against unfavourable market movements in interest rates inherent in the underlying assets and liabilities. The impact of exposure to sustained low interest rates is regularly monitored. Equity risk The Group is subject to equity price risk due to daily changes in the market values of its equity securities portfolio. The Group’s shareholders are exposed to both direct equity shareholdings in its shareholder assets, and indirectly to the impact arising from changes in the value of equities held in policyholders funds from which management charges or a share of performance are taken, as well as from its interest in the free estate of long-term funds. At business unit level, equity price risk is actively managed through the use of derivative instruments, including futures and options, in order to mitigate anticipated unfavourable market movements where this lies outside the risk appetite of the fund concerned. Business units actively model the performance of equities through the use of stochastic models, in particular to understand the impact of equity performance on guarantees, options and bonus rates. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 61 Directors’ report: Operating and financial review Risk management Risk management continued In particular, Jackson actively hedges its exposure to the guarantees arising from its variable annuity business. Where possible, Jackson will seek to find offsetting exposures across its asset and liability portfolios and to conduct its hedging activities on a macro basis, and relies on option-based strategies to address tail risks. Although the macro approach and the hedging of tail events are not consistent with the way certain accounting methods test for effectiveness, our view is that the efficiency of execution and the need to hedge on an economic basis outweighs the need to avoid any short-term accounting volatility. The Group does not have material holdings of unquoted equity securities. In addition, local asset admissibility regulations require that business units hold diversified portfolios of assets thereby reducing exposure to individual equities. fund, pension annuity policyholders receive a guaranteed payment, for as long as they are alive. Prudential conducts rigorous research into longevity risk using data from its substantial annuitant portfolio. As part of its pension annuity pricing and reserving policy, Prudential UK assumes that current rates of mortality continuously improve over time at levels based on adjusted data from the Continuous Mortality Investigations (CMI) medium cohort table projections as published by the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries. Prudential’s voluntary discontinuance (persistency) assumptions reflect recent past experience for each relevant line of business, and any expectations of future persistency. Where appropriate, allowance is also made for the relationship, which is either assumed or historically observed, between persistency and investment returns and the resulting additional risk is allowed for. Credit risk Credit risk is the risk of loss in the value of financial assets due to counterparties failing to meet all or part of their obligations. Credit risk is Prudential’s most significant financial risk, and it is actively monitored by business units via business unit investment committees and ALCOs. In addition to business unit operational limits on credit risk (requiring business units to implement local credit risk policies), Prudential’s management of credit risk includes monitoring exposures at Group level. Large individual counterparty exposures are aggregated and monitored on a quarterly basis against centrally-set red zone, amber zone and green zone limits. This active monitoring of counterparty exposures, on a consolidated Group level, is undertaken by the Group ALCO. Financial assets are graded according to current credit ratings issued by the rating agencies. Financial assets are classified within the range of AAA to D ratings, with AAA being the highest possible rating. Typically, around 95 per cent of the Groups assets are rated within the investment grade category (BBB- and higher). The level of financial assets which fall outside the range of the ratings is also monitored on an ongoing basis, and this tends to be less than one per cent of shareholder assets at any given point in time. Insurance risk Prudential needs to make assumptions about a number of factors in determining the pricing of its products and for reporting the results of its long-term business operations. In common with other industry participants, the profitability of the Group’s businesses depends on a mix of factors including mortality and morbidity trends, voluntary discontinuance rates, investment performance, unit cost of administration and new business acquisition expense. For example, the assumption that Prudential makes about future expected levels of mortality is particularly relevant for its UK annuity business where in exchange for their accumulated pension Liquidity risk Liquidity risk is the risk that a business, though solvent, either does not have the financial resources to meet its obligations as they fall due or can secure the resources only at excessive cost. Business units have their own liquidity policies, which also depend on the maturity of the business, and the available assets in the markets. For Prudential UK, liquidity risk is managed through holding assets at the greater of a specified percentage of total funds managed or a specified multiple of the average peak daily cash flow over the last 12 months. For Jackson, modelling is performed on how quickly their different liabilities could be called, and how quickly they could also liquidate their assets, ensuring that at 30, 90 days and one year the cash available exceeds potential obligations. For Prudential Group, there is a committed corporate credit facility for liquidity. Non-financial risk Prudential’s Group Risk Framework also covers non-financial risks – operational risk, business environment risk, strategic risk and regulatory compliance risk. Prudential processes a large number of complex transactions across numerous and diverse products, and is subject to a number of different legal and regulatory regimes. Prudential outsources several operations, including certain UK processing and IT functions and is thus reliant upon the operational processing performance of its outsourcing partners. Business units are responsible for the management of the non- financial risks associated with their business. They conduct a formal self-assessment of material operational risks and assess their impact and likelihood. Business units also identify control available to mitigate the impact or likelihood or both of the identified risk. There is also an assessment of the control which considers the quality of the control’s design. 62 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Directors’ report: Operating and financial review Risk management Quantitative analysis is carried out for operational risks with material and potential direct losses (i.e. excluding opportunity costs and lost revenue). For each risk, the analysis describes the possible manifestations of the risk and the controls against it in each business unit and, on this basis, frequency and severity parameters are assigned to each risk. The effect of operational risk on the Group as a whole is analysed by aggregating the individual risks using a Group operational risk capital model, allowing for the correlations and diversification effects between different risk types and business units. Financial strength and capital management Prudential’s financial strength and credit ratings, which are intended to measure its ability to meet policyholder obligations, are an important factor affecting public confidence in most of Prudential’s products and, as a result, its competitiveness. Changes in methodologies and criteria used by rating agencies could result in downgrades that do not reflect changes in the general economic conditions or Prudential’s financial condition. Downgrades in Prudential’s ratings could have an adverse effect on its ability to market products and retain current policyholders. In addition, the interest rates Prudential pays on its borrowings are affected by its debt credit ratings, which are in place to measure Prudential’s ability to meet its contractual obligations. Prudential believes the credit rating downgrades it experienced in 2002 and 2003, together with the rest of the UK insurance industry, and in 2006 by Standard & Poor’s to bring it into line with the standard rating agency notching between operating subsidiary financial strength rating and the credit rating for other European insurance holding companies have not to date had a discernible impact on the performance of its business. Prudential’s long-term senior debt is rated as A2 (stable outlook) by Moody’s, A+ (stable outlook) by Standard & Poor’s and AA– (stable outlook) by Fitch. Prudential’s short-term debt is rated as P-1 by Moody’s, A-1 by Standard & Poor’s and F1+ by Fitch. The PAC long-term fund is rated Aa1 (stable outlook) by Moody’s, AA+ (stable outlook) by Standard & Poor’s and AA+ (stable outlook) by Fitch. Prudential’s insurance and investment management operations are generally conducted through subsidiaries. As a holding company, Prudential’s principal sources of funds are dividends from subsidiaries, shareholder-backed funds, the shareholder transfer from Prudential’s long-term funds and any amounts that may be raised through the issuance of equity, debt and commercial paper. Certain of the subsidiaries are regulated and therefore have restrictions that can limit the payment of dividends, which in some circumstances could limit the Group’s ability to pay dividends to shareholders. Summary of risk factors The International Organisation of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) has recommended that annual reports of publicly held companies include a section on risk factors which discusses inherent risks in the business and trading environment. The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requires listed companies to disclose prominently risk factors that are specific to the companies or their industries in their annual reports on Form 20-F filed with the SEC. The Accounting Standards Board’s Reporting Statement: Operating and Financial Review (OFR), recommends as best practice, that the OFR has a description of the principal risks and uncertainties facing the business. The European Union (EU) Prospectus Directive also requires disclosure of risk factors. A number of factors (risk factors) affect Prudential’s operating results, financial condition and trading price. The risk factors mentioned below should not be regarded as a complete and comprehensive statement of all potential risks and uncertainties. The information given is as of the date of this report, is not updated, and any forward-looking statements are made subject to the reservations specified on the inside back cover of the Annual Report. Prudential’s businesses are inherently subject to market fluctuations and general economic conditions. Prudential’s businesses are inherently subject to market fluctuations and general economic conditions. In the UK, this is because a significant part of Prudential’s shareholders’ profit is related to bonuses for policyholders declared on its with-profits products, which are broadly based on historic and current rates of return on equity, real estate and fixed income securities, as well as Prudential’s expectations of future investment returns. In the US, fluctuations in prevailing interest rates can affect results from Jackson, which has a significant spread-based business with the majority of its assets invested in fixed income securities. In particular, fixed annuities and stable value products written by Jackson expose the Group to the risk that changes in interest rates, which are not fully reflected in the interest rates credited to customers, will reduce spread. The spread is the difference between the amounts that Jackson is required to pay under the contracts and the rate of return it is able to earn on its general account investments to support the obligations under the contracts. Declines in spread from these products or other spread businesses that Jackson conducts could have a material impact on its businesses or results of operations. For some non-unit-linked investment products, in particular those written in some of the Group’s Asian operations, it may not be possible to hold assets which will provide cash flows to exactly match those relating to policyholder liabilities. This is particularly true in those countries where bond markets are not developed and in certain markets such as Taiwan where regulated surrender values are set by regulators with reference to the interest rate environment prevailing at time of policy issue. This results in a mismatch due to the duration and uncertainty of the liability cash Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 63 Directors’ report: Operating and financial review Risk management Risk management continued flows and the lack of sufficient assets of a suitable duration. This residual asset/liability mismatch risk can be managed but not eliminated. Where interest rates in these markets remain lower than surrender values over a sustained period this could have an adverse impact on the Group’s reported profit. In all markets in which Prudential operates, its businesses are susceptible to general economic conditions and changes in investment returns, which can change the level of demand for Prudential’s products. Past uncertain trends in international economic and investment climates which have adversely affected Prudential’s business and profitability could be repeated. This adverse effect would be felt principally through reduced investment returns and credit defaults. In addition, falling investment returns could impair Prudential’s operational capability, including its ability to write significant volumes of new business. Prudential in the normal course of business enters into a variety of transactions, including derivative transactions with counterparties. Failure of any of these counterparties, particularly in conditions of major market disruption, to discharge their obligations, or where adequate collateral is not in place, could have an adverse impact on Prudential’s results. Prudential is subject to the risk of exchange rate fluctuations owing to the geographical diversity of its businesses. Due to the geographical diversity of Prudential’s businesses, it is subject to the risk of exchange rate fluctuations. Prudential’s international operations in the US and Asia, which represent a significant proportion of operating profit and shareholders’ funds, generally write policies and invest in assets denominated in local currency. Although this practice limits the effect of exchange rate fluctuations on local operating results, it can lead to significant fluctuations in Prudential’s consolidated financial statements upon translation of results into pounds sterling. The currency exposure relating to the translation of reported earnings is not separately managed. Consequently, this could impact on the Group’s gearing ratios (defined as debt over debt plus shareholders’ funds). The impact of gains or losses on currency translations is recorded as a component of shareholders’ funds within the statement of changes in equity. Prudential conducts its businesses subject to regulation and associated regulatory risks, including the effects of changes in the laws, regulations, policies and interpretations and any accounting standards in the markets in which it operates. Changes in government policy, legislation or regulatory interpretation applying to companies in the financial services and insurance industries in any of the markets in which Prudential operates, which in some circumstances may be applied retrospectively, may adversely affect Prudential’s product range, distribution channels, capital requirements and, consequently, reported results and financing requirements. For instance, regulators in jurisdictions in which Prudential operates may change the level of capital required to be held by individual businesses. Also these changes could include possible changes in the regulatory framework for pension arrangements and policies, the regulation of selling practices and solvency requirements. In the UK several proposed and potential regulatory changes could 64 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 have significant effect on the types of products Prudential provides to its customers and intermediaries and how those products are priced, distributed and sold. These include the FSA’s move towards principles-based regulation, the FSA’s Treating Customers Fairly initiative, the FSA’s review of retail distribution, the proposed regulatory change affecting the UK pensions market and the implementation of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) and the Solvency II directive. Current EU directives require European financial services groups to demonstrate net aggregate surplus capital in excess of solvency requirements at the Group level in respect of shareholder-owned entities. The test is a continuous requirement, so that Prudential needs to maintain a somewhat higher amount of regulatory capital at the Group level than otherwise necessary in respect of some of its individual businesses to accommodate, for example, short-term movements in global foreign exchange rates, interest rates, deterioration in credit quality and equity markets. In addition, changes in the local regulatory regimes of designated territories could affect the calculation of the Group’s solvency position under FCD. Given the recently announced sale of Egg, and pending discussions with the FSA, Prudential may again become an insurance group rather than its current classification as a financial conglomerate. This would imply that Prudential would have to meet the requirements of the EU Insurance Groups Directive (IGD). This should not have a significant impact on the Group, as the FSA’s prudential requirements pertaining to insurance groups are very similar to those applying to financial conglomerates. The EU is also currently reviewing future solvency requirements (Solvency II) with a draft directive expected in mid 2007 for implementation by member states not earlier than 2010. Inconsistent application of these directives by regulators in different EU member states may place Prudential at a competitive disadvantage to other European financial services groups. Various jurisdictions in which Prudential operates have created investor compensation schemes that require mandatory contributions from market participants in some instances in the event of a failure of a market participant. As a major participant in the majority of its chosen markets, circumstances could arise where Prudential, along with other companies, may be required to make additional material contributions. Any further changes or modification of the recently introduced IFRS accounting policies and EEV guidance may require a change in the reporting basis of future results or a restatement of reported results. The resolution of several issues affecting the financial services industry could have a negative impact on Prudential’s reported results or on its reputation or on its relations with current and potential customers. Prudential is, and in the future may be, subject to legal and regulatory actions in the ordinary course of its business, both in the UK and internationally. This could be a review of business sold in the past under previously acceptable market practices at the time such as the requirement in the UK to provide redress to certain past purchasers of pension and mortgage endowment policies and regulatory reviews on products sold and industry practices, including in the latter case businesses it has closed. Directors’ report: Operating and financial review Risk management Regulators particularly, but not exclusively, in the US and the UK are increasingly interested in the approach that product providers use to select third-party distributors and to monitor sales made by them. In the US, federal and state regulators have focused on, and continue to devote substantial attention to, the mutual fund, variable annuity and insurance product industries. This includes new regulations in respect of the suitability of broker-dealers’ sales of certain products. As a result of publicity relating to widespread perceptions of industry abuses, there have been numerous regulatory inquiries and proposals for legislative and regulatory reforms. In Asia, regulatory regimes are developing at different speeds, driven by a combination of global factors and local considerations. There is a risk that new requirements are introduced that are retrospectively applied to sales made prior to their introduction. Litigation and disputes may adversely affect Prudential’s profitability and financial condition. Prudential is, and may be in the future, subject to legal actions and disputes in the ordinary course of its insurance, investment management and other business operations. These legal actions and disputes may relate to aspects of Prudential’s businesses and operations that are specific to Prudential, or that are common to companies that operate in Prudential’s markets. Legal actions and disputes may arise under contracts, regulations or from a course of conduct taken by Prudential, and may be class actions. Although Prudential believes that it has adequately reserved in all material aspects for the costs of litigation and regulatory matters, no assurance can be provided that such reserves are sufficient. Given the large or indeterminate amounts of damages sometimes sought, and the inherent unpredictability of litigation and disputes, it is possible that an adverse outcome could, from time to time, have an adverse effect on Prudential’s results of operation or cash flows. Prudential’s businesses are conducted in highly competitive environments with developing demographic trends and Prudential’s continued profitability depends on its management’s ability to respond to these pressures and trends. The markets for the UK, the US and Asian financial services are highly competitive, with several factors affecting Prudential’s ability to sell its products and its continued profitability, including price and yields offered, financial strength and ratings, range of product lines and product quality, brand strength and name recognition, investment management performance, historical bonus levels, developing demographic trends and customer appetite for certain savings products. In some of its markets Prudential faces competitors that are larger, have greater financial resources or a greater market share, offer a broader range of products or have higher bonus rates or claims-paying ratios. Further, heightened competition for talented and skilled employees with local experience, particularly in Asia, may limit the Group’s potential to grow its business as quickly as planned. Within the UK, Prudential’s principal competitors in the life insurance market include many of the major retail financial services companies including, in particular, Aviva, Legal & General, HBOS and Standard Life. Jackson’s competitors in the US include major stock and mutual insurance companies, mutual fund organisations, banks and other financial services companies such as AXA Financial Inc, Hartford Life Inc., Lincoln National, MetLife, Prudential Financial and TIAA-CREF. Prudential believes competition will intensify across all regions in response to consumer demand, technological advances the impact of consolidation, regulatory actions and other factors. Prudential’s ability to generate an appropriate return depends significantly upon its capacity to anticipate and respond appropriately to these competitive pressures. Downgrades in Prudential’s financial strength and credit ratings could significantly impact its competitive position and hurt its relationships with creditors or trading counterparties. Prudential’s financial strength and credit ratings, which are intended to measure its ability to meet policyholder obligations, are an important factor affecting public confidence in most of Prudential’s products and, as a result, its competitiveness. Changes in methodologies and criteria used by rating agencies could result in downgrades that do not reflect changes in the general economic conditions or Prudential’s financial condition. Downgrades in Prudential’s ratings could have an adverse effect on its ability to market products and retain current policyholders. In addition, the interest rates Prudential pays on its borrowings are affected by its debt credit ratings, which are in place to measure Prudential’s ability to meet its contractual obligations. Prudential believes the credit rating downgrades it experienced in 2002 and 2003, together with the rest of the UK insurance industry, and in 2006 by Standard & Poor’s to bring Prudential into line with the standard rating agency notching between operating subsidiary financial strength rating and the credit rating for other European insurance holding companies, have not to date had a discernible impact on the performance of its business. Prudential’s long-term senior debt is rated as A2 (stable outlook) by Moody’s, A+ (stable outlook) by Standard & Poor’s and AA– (stable outlook) by Fitch. Prudential’s short-term debt is rated as P-1 by Moody’s, A-1 by Standard & Poor’s and F1+ by Fitch. The PAC long-term fund is rated Aa1 (stable outlook) by Moody’s, AA+ (stable outlook) by Standard & Poor’s and AA+ (stable outlook) by Fitch. Adverse experience in the operational risks inherent in Prudential’s business could have a negative impact on its results of operations. Operational risks are present in all of Prudential’s businesses, including the risk of direct or indirect loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal and external processes, systems and human error or from external events. Prudential’s business is dependent on processing a large number of complex transactions across numerous and diverse products, and is subject to a number of different legal and regulatory regimes. In addition, Prudential outsources several operations, including certain UK processing and IT functions. In turn, Prudential is reliant upon the operational processing performance of its outsourcing partners. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 65 Prudential operates in a number of markets through joint ventures and other arrangements with third parties. These arrangements involve certain risks that Prudential does not face with respect to its consolidated subsidiaries. Prudential operates, and in certain markets is required by local regulation to operate, through joint ventures. Prudential’s ability to exercise management control over its joint venture operations and its investment in them depends on the terms of the joint venture agreements, in particular, the allocation of control among, and continued co-operation between, the joint venture participants. Prudential may also face financial or other exposure in the event that any of its joint venture partners fails to meet its obligations under the joint venture or encounters financial difficulty. In addition, a significant proportion of the Group’s product distribution is carried out through arrangements with third parties not controlled by Prudential and is dependent upon continuation of these relationships. A temporary or permanent disruption to these distribution arrangements could affect Prudential’s results of operations. Directors’ report: Operating and financial review Risk management Risk management continued Further, because of the long-term nature of much of Prudential’s business, accurate records have to be maintained for significant periods. Prudential’s systems and processes incorporate controls which are designed to manage and mitigate the operational risks associated with its activities. For example, any weakness in the administration systems or actuarial reserving processes could have an impact on its results of operations during the effective period. Prudential has not experienced or identified any operational risks in its systems or processes during 2006, or which have subsequently caused, or are expected to cause, a significant negative impact on its results of operations. Adverse experience against the assumptions used in pricing products and reporting business results could significantly affect Prudential’s results of operations. Prudential needs to make assumptions about a number of factors in determining the pricing of its products and for reporting the results of its long-term business operations. For example, the assumption that Prudential makes about future expected levels of mortality is particularly relevant for its UK annuity business. In exchange for a premium equal to the capital value of their accumulated pension fund, pension annuity policyholders receive a guaranteed payment, usually monthly, for as long as they are alive. Prudential conducts rigorous research into longevity risk, using data from its substantial annuitant portfolio. As part of its pension annuity pricing and reserving policy, Prudential UK assume that current rates of mortality continuously improve over time, at levels based on adjusted data from the Continuous Mortality Investigations (CMI) medium cohort table projections (as published by the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries). If mortality improvement rates significantly exceed the improvement assumed, Prudential’s results of operations could be adversely affected. A further example is the assumption that Prudential makes about future expected levels of the rates of early termination of products by its customers (persistency). This is particularly relevant to its lines of business other than its UK annuity business. Prudential’s persistency assumptions reflect recent past experience for each relevant line of business. Any expected deterioration in future persistency is also reflected in the assumption. If actual levels of future persistency are significantly lower than assumed (that is, policy termination rates are significantly higher than assumed), Prudential’s results of operations could be adversely affected. In common with other industry participants, the profitability of the Group’s businesses depends on a mix of factors including mortality and morbidity trends, policy surrender rates, investment performance, unit cost of administration and new business acquisition expense. As a holding company, Prudential is dependent upon its subsidiaries to cover operating expenses and dividend payments. Prudential’s insurance and investment management operations are generally conducted through direct and indirect subsidiaries. As a holding company, Prudential’s principal sources of funds are dividends from subsidiaries, shareholder-backed funds, the shareholder transfer from Prudential’s long-term funds and any amounts that may be raised through the issuance of equity, debt and commercial paper. Certain of the subsidiaries are regulated and therefore have restrictions that can limit the payment of dividends, which in some circumstances could limit the Group’s ability to pay dividends to shareholders. 66 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Directors’ report: Operating and financial review Corporate responsibility review Corporate responsibility review Acting responsibly Corporate Responsibility (CR) is fundamental to how Prudential operates and is a philosophy that is now embedded in the business. Prudential recognises that its stakeholders, which include its customers, people, shareholders and the communities around its businesses, increasingly support those companies that define and exhibit sound values around trust, ethics and environmental responsibility. Prudential also believes that its performance in key areas of conduct such as corporate governance, environmental management and employment practices can have a significant and positive impact on the Group’s financial performance. Prudential’s main focus in 2006 was to ensure that its CR strategy continued to align with its business objectives and with its stakeholder concerns. Management and policy Prudential has developed a Group Governance Framework which is underpinned by a Group Governance Manual and associated processes. This encompasses all key policies and procedures, for example its Group Code of Business Conduct, its CR Policy and its Health and Safety Policy. Prudential sets its own codes and policies that often go further than legislative requirements. Prudential also operates a Group Risk Framework which focuses on reputation issues. The controls, which are applicable across the Group, are clearly set out in the Group Governance Manual. Prudential’s Group Finance Director, Philip Broadley, has Board level responsibility for social, environmental and ethical risk management. The Board discusses Prudential’s performance on these areas at least once a year. The Board also reviews and approves Prudential’s CR report and strategy. Below the Board, the Corporate Responsibility Committee is a specialist Group-wide committee chaired by the Group Finance Director. It is responsible for reviewing business conduct and social and environmental policy and ensures consistency across the Group’s international businesses. The Corporate Responsibility team, which is located in Group Head Office, develops its strategy, provides training across the Group, and works closely with individual business units to provide advice, ensuring that the Group’s core values are maintained and assisting with the development and adaptation of Group-wide initiatives so that they not only fit the overall Group principles but also meet local needs. Group Code of Business Conduct Prudential’s Group Code of Business Conduct (the Code) sets out the ethical standards the Board requires of itself, its employees, agents and others working on behalf of the Group, in their dealings with employees, customers, shareholders, suppliers, competitors, the wider community and the environment. This policy is now in force across the Group and compliance by all business units is mandatory. The Code is published both internally on the Group Head Office intranet and externally on the Prudential website. It is also integrated within the Group Governance Manual and is covered by the annual compliance certification process. In 2006, we translated the Code into Chinese, Korean and Thai. These translations are now available on Prudential’s internet site. As part of the Corporate Responsibility strategy, Prudential engaged KPMG in 2006 to review, at the Group Head Office level, the Group Code of Business Conduct, the process by which Prudential communicates the Code and the systems in place for monitoring the Code. Prudential is currently in the process of reviewing the findings from this review and formulating a plan for implementing improvements. Stakeholder dialogue Stakeholder engagement enables employees and relevant external groups to help shape what Prudential does and ensure that their reasonable expectations are translated into business value. This means listening to and working with its stakeholders and being very clear about its intentions and priorities. During 2006, Prudential commissioned research organisation Ipsos Mori to help it gauge which CR issues are important to its key stakeholders. The results indicated that good environmental management and climate change are, perhaps unsurprisingly, very high on the agenda for companies in general. Issues such as ethical investment and transparent product information are also highlighted as important for financial services companies. In response, the CR team is working with the Group Health, Safety and Environment team and Prudential Property Investment Managers Limited (PRUPIM), part of M&G, to ensure that Prudential is effectively addressing and aligning its environmental management practices. Assisting people to manage their investments is fundamental to the Group’s business. Prudential UK has therefore continued to hold monthly MeetPru events, which give its customers the opportunity to meet members of the UK executive team and ask questions about both their own policies and broader issues, including the CR programme. M&G has developed a number of spin-free guides for investors which provide straight-forward, easy-to-understand information on a range of investment options, including bonds and equities, while also tackling subjects such as ‘understanding risk’. Improving financial capability The Group’s core financial education programme is based on the need to play its part in enabling consumers to make the right decisions for their individual needs. Such decisions range from debt management to savings needs. Informing and empowering consumers to make such decisions will, Prudential believes, build better and more permanent relationships between consumers and providers. Prudential began developing its Financial Literacy programme in the United Kingdom in 2001. Six years later, Prudential is seeing significant continued progress, both in the UK and internationally. In the UK, via partnerships with diverse organisations such as Citizens Advice; the Personal Finance Education Group (pfeg); Specialist Schools and Academies Trust and National Institute of Adult Continuing Education, thousands of adults and children are now benefiting from learning how to make decisions that will have a profound effect on their financial wellbeing. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 67 Directors’ report: Operating and financial review Corporate responsibility review Corporate responsibility review continued Prudential extended its initiative to Asia in 2004, with an innovative programme called Investing in Your Future, which focuses on women, who are often responsible for planning their family’s financial needs. This was first launched in China and rolled out in Vietnam in 2005. During 2006, Prudential extended this programme into India and piloted a project in Malaysia. To date, more than 10,000 women have graduated from the programme in Asia. Investing in our communities In 2006, Prudential invested £4.7 million in a wide range of projects around its business, supporting education, welfare and environmental initiatives. This total includes the significant contribution made by many of the people around the Group through volunteering, often linked with professional skills development. It also includes direct donations to charitable organisations of £3.15 million. In December 2005, The Chairman’s Award, the Group’s international employee volunteering programme was launched across the Group. The programme is managed by the Group CR team and is co-ordinated by local business unit champions around the world. Prudential recognises that many employees already make a significant contribution to charities as volunteers in their own free time. The Chairman’s Award was set up to recognise this involvement in the community and to give all the Group’s employees the opportunity to get involved with a local charitable project and to increase the value of the community support they offer through additional contributions. The charities that Prudential supports were selected following a Group-wide survey of its employees, which identified a preference for projects that address the needs of children and the elderly within their local community. Prudential has identified sustainable projects which, where possible, have education at their core. This lies at the heart of the Group CR programme aiming to raise levels of financial capability worldwide. In 2006, over 1,600 employees registered to volunteer and The Chairman’s Award supported over 50 projects around the world. For example, over 180 pre-school children in Thailand will be able to attend new child care centres thanks to the volunteering efforts of Prudential’s employees, where The Chairman’s Award is funding the redevelopment and refurbishment of four centres in the Srirattana district in the Srisaket province. Similarly, employees from Jackson in Denver have been volunteering through Junior Achievement’s schools programme, helping to educate and inspire young people to value free enterprise, business and economics to improve the quality of their lives. Over 160 students have benefited from the volunteering efforts of the Group’s employees. Responsible investment (RI) M&G‘s approach to responsible investment (RI) is set out in the booklet Issues Arising from Share Ownership, available at www.mandg.co.uk. RI has focused principally on equity markets. However, with more than £19 billion (as at 31 December 2006) of funds under management, PRUPIM, is one of the UK’s largest commercial property investment managers and accounts for over 80 per cent of Prudential’s direct environmental impact in the UK. 68 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Through participation in the Institutional Investor’s Group on climate change and its participation on the property working group of the United Nations Environment Programme Finance Initiative (UNEP FI), PRUPIM is creating awareness of the implications of climate change for property investment and how Prudential should address this. Employees The following information is given principally in respect of employees of the Group in the UK. The policy towards employees overseas is the same but the practical application of the policy varies according to local requirements. Equal opportunity Prudential recognises, respects and values difference and diversity. Its equal opportunities policy is to be fair, responsible and caring in all aspects of the business. The Group seeks to ensure all employees and applicants to its businesses are given equal opportunity in all aspects of employment to ensure that the Group’s businesses attract, retain and promote the best available talent. All the businesses work to embed these principles in all aspects of their management practices and to ensure that this is evident to employees in their day-to-day work. It is Group policy to give full and fair consideration and encouragement to the employment of applicants with suitable aptitudes and abilities, and to continuing the employment of staff who become disabled, and to providing training and career development opportunities to disabled employees. Employee involvement The Group has effective communication channels through which employees’ views can be sought on issues which concern them. Throughout the Group there is close consultation between management and other employees on appropriate matters of concern, with a view to keeping employees informed about the progress of the Group’s business and the economic factors affecting it. Communication with employees is achieved in a number of ways, including one-to-one staff briefings and through the Group’s intranet site. M&G’s Staff Consultative Committee and UK Insurance Operations’ Employee Forum promote communication and consultation throughout their respective businesses and provide for dialogue on a range of issues of interest to their staff. Following the creation of PGDS in 2006, which brought together IT infrastructure staff into one Group business, PGDS in the UK commenced the development of a staff consultative forum with the election of representatives. It is intended that this forum, along with effective direct consultation, will deliver an excellent two-way dialogue between staff and PGDS management. In 2006, employees were again invited to participate in the Prudential Savings-Related Share Option Scheme. The Scheme has now been operating for 23 years and 40 per cent of UK staff currently participate. The Prudential International Savings-Related Share Option Scheme (ISSOS) for employees has been operating since 2000 in Hong Kong, Malaysia and Singapore; since 2001 in Taiwan and India; and since 2003 in Korea. On average 15 per cent of employees in those countries covered by the ISSOS currently participate. In addition, since 2002 Prudential has operated the International Savings-Related Share Option Scheme for Non-Employees (ISSOSNE) for its agents in Hong Kong. Currently 11 per cent of agents participate. Directors’ report: Operating and financial review Corporate responsibility review Following shareholder agreement in 2000 to authorise the Board to introduce a Share Incentive Plan, The Prudential UK Share Incentive Plan (SIP) was introduced in 2004 for employees of Prudential UK Services Limited and The Prudential Assurance Company Limited, and in 2005 for employees of Prudential Services Limited. This plan enables employees to buy Prudential shares on a tax-efficient basis. For every four Partnership shares bought, an additional Matching share is granted. Currently 12 per cent of eligible staff participate. The trustees of each of the Group’s UK pension schemes include elected individuals. Training and development In the UK, Prudential is a member of the Employers’ Forum on Disability, the Employers in the Community Network, set up by the National Centre for Volunteering, Race for Opportunity and the Work Foundation. These organisations aim to share best practice, promote the benefits of a diverse workforce and make discrimination in the workplace a thing of the past. Engaging with employees and understanding their expectations about corporate values, transparency, career development, performance management, diversity and work-life balance is essential. This understanding helps the Group to attract, retain and motivate its employees. Prudential recognises that it will benefit from the opportunity for its employees to develop their talents and achieve satisfying and rewarding careers. Prudential is therefore committed to promoting individual development and regularly assesses employees’ abilities, progress and individual training needs. In Asia, employee education is provided across the Group’s Asian markets through PRUuniversity, which is available to all staff and is offered in multiple languages. Programmes are centrally credited and many are endorsed by external learning institutions. The courses cover CR, management and leadership, technical and business skills as well as a comprehensive range of self-improvement material including language courses. Treating customers fairly The financial services industry is working with the UK regulator, Government and consumers to improve the way they treat customers. Prudential now has more than seven million customers in Asia, over three million policies and contracts in force across the US through Jackson, and over seven million customers in the UK through Prudential UK. Prudential is committed to providing a high level of customer service, communicating openly with customers, providing clear information and to monitoring levels of satisfaction. Prudential UK has signed up to the Association of British Insurers’ (ABI) Customer Impact Scheme. This Scheme is part of the industry’s commitment to continuously build on customers’ experiences, and Prudential will participate in an annual customer survey, to measure changes in its customers’ experiences and attitudes. Jackson measures its customer service quality through annual benchmarking surveys. Prudential Corporation Asia surveyed a sample of its customers in each of its 16 retail businesses in Asia, to assess the likelihood of its customers recommending Prudential Corporation Asia to their family and friends. Environment/sustainable development Protecting the environment is essential for the quality of life of current and future generations. The challenge is to combine continuing economic growth with long-term sustainable development. Prudential will endeavour to ensure its policies and business actions promote the consideration of the environment. The CR team is working with its peers in other companies to develop an industry-wide approach to climate change. Prudential is part of the Forge Group, a consortium of financial institutions formed to address the CR issues facing the financial services industry and to develop a consistent approach towards their management. In November 2006, the Forge Group agreed that its focus in 2007 will be climate change and its strategic implications for the financial services sector. In the US, Jackson has carefully monitored and worked to minimise any negative environmental impact since it moved to its current headquarters in 2000, working with State and local authorities on new projects which protect the environment. Supply chain management Prudential recognises that its own social, environmental and economic impacts are associated not only with the products and services it supplies but also with the performance of its suppliers and contractors. It is Prudential’s policy to work in partnership with its suppliers to help them reduce their impact on the environment and to manage the challenges of sustainable growth. The number of suppliers engaged on a business as usual basis is very high. Prudential has therefore chosen to focus on those suppliers that potentially pose the greatest risk to the environment. As a result, Prudential has identified 55 suppliers to work with on the programme. Donations Prudential is committed to supporting the communities where it is an employer. In 2006, the Group spent £4.7 million in support of the community. Within this, direct donations to charitable organisations amounted to £3.15 million, of which £2.35 million came from European (EU) operations. This is broken down as follows: Education £1,068,000; Social and Welfare £809,000; Environment and Regeneration £82,000; Cultural £149,000 and Staff Volunteering £242,000. The aggregate figure for charitable donations from Prudential’s non-EU subsidiaries (Jackson and Prudential Corporation Asia) amounted to £0.8 million. It is the Group’s policy not to make donations to political parties or to incur political expenditure, within the meaning of those expressions as defined in the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000, and the Group did not make any such donations or incur any such expenditure in 2006. Further information can be found in Acting Responsibly, the Group’s Corporate Responsibility Report 2006/7, accessed at www.prudential.co.uk/prudential-plc/cr/ Hard copies of the report are available from the Group’s CR team: Laurence Pountney Hill, London EC4R 0HH. Tel: 020 7548 3706 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 69 Directors’ report: Operating and financial review Corporate responsibility review Corporate responsibility review continued Non-financial key performance table The table below summarises key programme areas against our commitments, and outlines some of the Group’s achievements to date and Prudential’s priorities for 2007. Progamme areas Financial Literacy Customers Key performance Indicator Measurement Continue to invest and help people to become more informed about their financial well-being and build the long-term capacity of community organisations to provide financial education. Monitor progress with charity partners. All charity partners to complete a post-donation evaluation form. Continue to maintain high standards of customer service. Tracking systems in place to monitor customer satisfaction. To provide information for customers in a variety of ways. To continue being a responsible investor on behalf of our clients. Contribute to the investment performance of M&G funds. To gain a comprehensive understanding of the costs and benefits of sustainable property investments. To implement relevant sustainable property investment techniques across our PRUPIM property portfolio in a way that will increase sustainability, while protecting and enhancing investor returns. Community Make a measurable and positive impact in the communities where we operate. Annual community spend as a percentage of pre-tax profit. Level of colleague volunteering. Employees Supply chain Environment Communicate internally about the value and benefit of CR, the goals and purpose of the organisation and the Group Code of Business Conduct. Maintain our commitment to health and safety management across the Group. Work with suppliers to maximise the beneficial social impact of our business, and reduce the environmental impact. Minimise our environmental impact, prevent pollution and unnecessary damage to the environment from our operations. Use a variety of communication channels e.g. CR e-learning module, employee magazines, Group intranet site, news updates, videos and webcasts. Total number of recordable health and safety incidents (under RIDDOR: Reporting of Injuries and Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations). Currently only measured in the UK. Total number of suppliers with whom we have discussed environmental or CR issues. Periodically review our environmental impact. Shareholders Focus on maximising long-term shareholder value, thereby delivering returns to investors. 70 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Ongoing measurement of building energy efficiency, water efficiency, waste recycling of our actively managed property portfolio. Dialogue with investors. Dialogue with investment analysts responsible for ethical investment funds. Inclusion in socially responsible indices e.g. FTSE4Good. Directors’ report: Operating and financial review Corporate responsibility review Progress in 2006 Prudential extended the financial literacy programme to India. Piloted the programme in Malaysia during December 2006. Prudential Corporation Asia has developed a detailed Customer Satisfaction model in Malaysia for its sales and service process. Jackson measures its customer service quality through annual benchmarking surveys. Prudential UK is accredited to the Association of British Insurers (ABI’s) Customer Impact Scheme. Prudential regularly updates customers on products and important financial topics through MeetPru events, Plan from the Pru, Pru News, the Prudential Magazine, and the M&G Spin-Free guides. Looking forward – in 2007 we plan to: Continue implementing the financial literacy programme in China, India and Vietnam, and we will review the pilot programme in Malaysia. Roll out the Customer Satisfaction model in Asia to other parts of its business and use feedback to improve customer service. Prudential UK plans to work closely with the ABI on the Customer Impact Scheme. Continue to provide customers with clear and responsible marketing information. M&G manages two ethical investment funds: Prudential M&G Light Green Fund and the Prudential Ethical Trust Fund. Continue to maintain active dialogue with our investee companies. Worked with the United Nations Environment Programme Finance Initiative (UNEP FI) to establish a Socially Responsible Property Investment Working Group. Play a central role in the activities of both the Investment Property Forum/Institutional Investors Group on Climate Change, Responsible Property Investment Working Group and the UNEP FI Responsible Property Investment Workstream. Based on IFRS statutory operating profit, Prudential’s community spend equates to 0.53 per cent. Continue to make a measurable and positive impact in the communities where we operate. Successfully launched the new employee volunteering programme, The Chairman’s Award and created appropriate relationships with charities in each of our markets to support this. Over 1,600 employees volunteered. Ensure we have community investment programmes running in most of our markets. Continued to update employees on CR initiatives and the Group Code of Business Conduct through the annual CR report, the annual CR webcast and fortnightly news updates. Update and roll out the CR e-learning module to all new employees. Continue to review and communicate our CR report and policies. We have recorded four RIDDOR accidents in the UK. Rolled out UK CR supply chain programme to 55 suppliers. Prudential developed a new Environmental Policy Statement which has been approved at Group level. A pilot scheme for an improved building management system is being tested in Reading, UK. If successful, this will reduce energy consumption and be introduced in other business units. Reviewed performance data. We have achieved ISO14001 certification for 10 actively managed properties. The Company has continued with a programme of dialogue with shareholders, across a broad geographic spread. Dialogue with investment analysts, CR rating agencies and research organisations responsible for ethical investment funds. Met FTSE4Good global CR criteria and awarded continued membership. Continue to work with business units to ensure compliance with the Group H&S Framework. Ensure each business unit produces an H&S action plan. Continue to work in partnership with our suppliers to help them reduce their social and environmental impacts. Provide environmental performance data across the Group. Establish an Environment Network initially in the UK and the US. We are continuing to roll out ISO14001 certification across our entire managed portfolio by the end of 2007. We are developing our monitoring and targeting system to measure environmental performance. Further dialogue with the investment community. Continue dialogue with the investment community. Continue to monitor progress and engage with the FTSE4Good co-ordinators. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 71 Directors’ report: Corporate governance Corporate governance 73 Corporate governance report 80 Board of directors 72 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Directors’ report: Corporate governance Corporate governance report Corporate governance report The directors are committed to high standards of corporate governance and support the Combined Code on Corporate Governance issued by the Financial Reporting Council (the Code). The Company has complied throughout the financial year ended 31 December 2006 with all of the provisions set out in Section 1 of the Code, and has applied the principles of the Code in the manner described below and in the directors’ remuneration report. The Group maintains a corporate website www.prudential.co.uk containing a wide range of information of interest to private and institutional investors where further information can be obtained, including the Group’s financial calendar. The Board As at 31 December 2006, the Board comprised the Chairman, six executive directors and seven independent non-executive directors, as set out on pages 80 and 81. Nick Prettejohn, Lord Turnbull and Barry Stowe were appointed as directors on 1 January 2006, 18 May 2006 and 1 November 2006 respectively. Rob Rowley and Mark Norbom ceased to be directors of the Company on 18 May 2006 and 14 December 2006 respectively. In accordance with the Articles of Association, Barry Stowe will retire and offer himself for election at the Annual General Meeting on 17 May 2007. Philip Broadley, Michael Garrett, Bridget Macaskill and Clark Manning will retire by rotation at the Annual General Meeting and offer themselves for re-election. The non-executive directors bring a wide range of business, financial and global experience to the Board. Biographical details of the current Board members appear on pages 80 and 81. Details of each director’s interests in shares and debentures of the Company and its subsidiary, Egg plc, which was listed until 20 February 2006, are set out in the directors’ remuneration report on page 88. Protections afforded to directors, including qualifying third party indemnities under the provisions of the Companies Act 1985, are detailed in the directors’ remuneration report on page 87. The roles of Chairman and Group Chief Executive are separate and clearly defined, and the scope of these roles has been approved by the Board so that no individual has unfettered powers of decision making. The Chairman is responsible for the leadership and governance of the Board as a whole and the Group Chief Executive for the management of the Group and the implementation of Board strategy and policy on the Board’s behalf. In discharging his responsibility, the Group Chief Executive is advised and assisted by the Group Executive Committee, comprising all the business unit heads and a Group head office team of functional specialists. James Ross is the Company’s Senior Independent Director, to whom concerns may be conveyed by shareholders if they are unable to resolve them through the existing mechanisms for investor communications, or where such channels are inappropriate. The Chairman meets, at least annually, with the non-executive directors without the executive directors being present. During 2006, the Board met 11 times and held a separate two-day strategy meeting. Each year, at least one of the Board meetings is held at one of the Group’s business operations to facilitate a fuller understanding of the diversity of the business. In June 2006, a Board meeting was held in Chicago. The Board also visited the offices of Jackson National Life Insurance Company (Jackson) in Lansing, Michigan, and took part in a day and a half of presentations given by senior members of the Jackson and PPM America management teams on the US businesses and future market opportunities. In November 2006, a Board meeting was held in Derby, which included presentations on the operations of Egg. The majority of the directors attended all scheduled Board meetings occurring during their period in office, apart from some absence due to ill health, family bereavements and one clash with a long-standing prior engagement. In addition, Mr Norbom was no longer required to attend Board meetings after it had been agreed that he would be leaving the Company. There were two additional Board meetings, and the majority of the directors attended those meetings. Where directors were not able to attend any of the meetings, their views were canvassed by the Chairman prior to the meeting. The table on page 77 details the number of Board and Committee meetings attended by each director throughout the year. A further six ad hoc Board Committee meetings took place during the year. In addition, the Chairman met with the non-executive directors without the executive directors present in December. The Board’s terms of reference, which are regularly reviewed, set out those matters specifically reserved to it for decision, in order to ensure that it exercises control over the Group’s affairs. These include approval of the annual and interim results, strategy and corporate objectives, operating plans, significant transactions and matters affecting the Company’s share capital. A corporate governance framework approved by the Board maps out the internal approvals processes and those matters which may be delegated. These principally relate to the operational management of the Group’s businesses and include pre-determined authority limits delegated by the Board to the Group Chief Executive for further delegation by him in respect of matters which are necessary for the effective day-to-day running and management of the business. The chief executive of each business unit, who in respect of his business unit responsibilities reports to the Group Chief Executive, has authority for management of that business unit and has established a management board comprising its most senior executives. In accordance with the Group Governance Framework, business unit chief executives certify annually their compliance with the requirements of the framework. The Board has adopted a Code of Business Conduct, which sets out the behaviour expected of staff in their dealings with shareholders, customers, fellow employees, suppliers and other stakeholders of the Group. A copy of the Company’s Code of Business Conduct may be found on the website at www.prudential.co.uk/prudential-plc/cr/managementpolicies/ codeofconduct The Board is responsible for ensuring that an effective system for succession planning and management development is in place. This is delivered through an established review process that is applied across all the businesses and covers both director and senior management succession and development. The Board reviews the outcomes of the review annually and actions arising from the review are implemented as part of the management development agenda. All directors have direct access to the services of the Company Secretary who advises them on all corporate governance matters, on Board procedures, and on compliance with applicable rules and regulations. In order to ensure good information flows, full Board Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 73 Directors’ report: Corporate governance Corporate governance report Corporate governance report continued and Committee papers are provided to the directors by the Company Secretary in the ordinary course approximately one week before each Board or Committee meeting. Other commitments of the Chairman and changes during the year are detailed in his biography on page 80. The Board is satisfied that these other commitments are not such as to interfere with the performance of the Chairman’s duties for the Group. Board Committees The Board has established audit, remuneration and nomination committees, each a standing committee of non-executive directors with written terms of reference, which are kept under regular review. Reports of each of those committees are included below: Audit Committee report The Group Audit Committee is a key element of the Group’s governance framework. This report sets out its responsibilities and the work the Committee has done to meet its objectives. Role of the Committee The Committee’s principal oversight responsibilities cover: • internal control and risk management; • internal audit; • half-year and full-year results, press releases and annual report and accounts; • accounting policies and key judgemental areas, Group policies for compliance with relevant regulations worldwide, including Sarbanes-Oxley procedures; • US filings and related external audit opinion; • external auditor’s interim management letter, external auditor’s full-year memorandum, external audit opinion and final management letter; • auditor independence, external auditor’s plans and audit strategy, effectiveness of the external audit process, external auditor’s qualifications, expertise and resources, economic service, and recommendations for the appointment/re- appointment of the external auditor; • framework and effectiveness of the Group’s systems of internal control and Turnbull compliance statement; • effectiveness of the Group Risk Framework and half-yearly key risk report; • internal audit plan and resources, and monitoring of the audit framework and internal audit effectiveness; • effectiveness of compliance processes and controls, and • external audit (including auditor independence); and performance against the Group Compliance Plan; • financial reporting. • audit committee effectiveness and terms of reference; The Committee has formal terms of reference set by the Board, which are reviewed regularly. • Group Security annual report, report on anti-money laundering and reporting of allegations from whistleblowers; Membership The Group Audit Committee is comprised exclusively of independent non-executive directors of the Company, as set out below: • International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and practices; • Supplementary Financial Reporting under European Embedded Value (EEV); and Kathleen O’Donovan ACA (Chairman) Keki Dadiseth FCA James Ross Lord Turnbull (appointed 1 January 2007) Full biographical details of the members of the Committee, including their relevant experience, are set out on pages 80 and 81. The Board has designated Kathleen O’Donovan as its audit committee financial expert for Sarbanes-Oxley Act purposes; she also has recent and relevant financial experience for the purposes of the Code. Meetings The Committee met nine times during the year. Additionally, by invitation, the Chairman of the Board, the Group Finance Director, the Group Chief Risk Officer, the Company Secretary, the Group- wide Internal Audit Director, and other senior staff from Internal Audit, Group Risk and Group Compliance where appropriate, as well as the external auditor, attended the majority of the meetings. The Chairman held preparatory meetings with the Group-wide Internal Audit Director, the Group Chief Risk Officer, the external auditor, the Group Finance Director and the Company Secretary before each Committee meeting, with the exception of single-issue meetings. A detailed annual agenda has been developed which ensures all matters for which the Committee is responsible are addressed at the appropriate time of year. The principal business of the Committee’s meetings includes: • changes in and implementation of Group Accounting Policies in compliance with International Accounting Standards and practices, including the European CFO Forum Principles and Guidance on Embedded Values and IFRS. During the year, the Committee’s standing agenda items also included reports from Group-wide Internal Audit, Group Risk, Group Compliance, Group Tax and Group Security. In addition, the Committee received presentations from some of the business unit chief executives and members of senior management. The Group Audit Committee Chairman reported to the Board on matters of particular significance after each Committee meeting, and the minutes of Committee meetings were circulated to all Board members. The Committee recognises the need to meet without the presence of executive management. Such sessions were held in February and July 2006 with the external and internal auditors, and in September 2006 with the internal auditors. Business unit audit committees Each business unit has its own audit committee whose members and chairmen are independent of the respective business unit. The chairmen of these committees are approved by the Chairman of the Group Audit Committee, and the committees are attended by business unit senior management including the business units’ chief executives and heads of finance, risk, compliance and internal audit. Business unit audit committees have similar terms 74 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Directors’ report: Corporate governance Corporate governance report of reference to the Group Audit Committee, and report significant issues to the Group Audit Committee when they arise. They approve the business unit internal audit plans and oversee the adequacy of internal audit resources, receive presentations from external audit, and meet privately with local external audit and the business unit heads of internal audit. Internal control and risk management The Group Audit Committee reviewed the Group’s statement on internal control systems prior to its endorsement by the Board. It also reviewed the policies and processes for identifying, assessing and managing business risks. Throughout the year, the Committee received the minutes of the Disclosure Committee and the Group Operational Risk Committee and noted their activities. Further information on those Committees appears on pages 79 and 55. Pursuant to the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Group must undertake an annual assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. In common with other companies which must comply with this legislation, this has required the Group to undertake a significant project to document and test its internal controls over financial reporting. The Committee has overseen the progress of this project through regular status reports submitted by management in 2006. During the year, the Group’s external auditor, KPMG Audit Plc, also reported to the Committee on the Company’s progress towards compliance with Section 404. The first annual assessment and related report from the external auditor will be included in the Group’s annual report on Form 20-F, which will be published in the coming months. Internal audit The Group Audit Committee regards its relationship with internal audit as a particularly important one. Group-wide Internal Audit plays an important role in supporting the Committee to fulfil its responsibilities under the Code and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Each of the Group’s business units has an internal audit team, the heads of which report to the Group-wide Internal Audit Director. Group- wide Internal Audit resources, plans and work are overseen by the Group Audit Committee and by business unit audit committees. Across the Group, total internal audit headcount stands at 118. The Group-wide Internal Audit Director reports functionally to the Committee and for management purposes to the Group Chief Risk Officer. During the year, the business unit audit committees reviewed and approved internal audit’s plans, resources and the results of its work. Reporting to the Group Audit Committee by Group-wide Internal Audit occurs through formal reports four times during the year and through private meetings, as well as additional regular private meetings between the Chairman of the Committee and the Group-wide Internal Audit Director. The Committee assesses the effectiveness of the internal audit function through a review carried out by external advisers, and through ongoing dialogue with the Group-wide Internal Audit Director. An external review of internal audit arrangements and standards was also conducted in 2006 to ensure that the activities and resources of internal audit are most effectively organised to support the oversight responsibilities of the Committee. This review, performed by Deloitte, confirmed that the internal audit function complies with the Institute of Internal Auditors’ international standards for the professional practice of internal auditing and is operating effectively. External audit The Group Audit Committee has a key oversight role in relation to the external auditor, KPMG Audit Plc, whose primary relationship is with the Committee. The Group’s Auditor Independence Policy ensures that the independence and objectivity of the external auditor is not impaired, and that the Group maintains a sufficient choice of appropriately qualified audit firms. The policy sets out four key principles which underpin the provision of non-audit services by the external auditor, namely that the auditor should not: • audit its own firm’s work; • make management decisions for the Group; • have a mutuality of financial interest with the Group; or • be put in the role of advocate for the Group. The Committee reviewed and updated the policy in December 2005. The Group has a policy that at least once every five years, the Committee undertakes a formal review to assess whether the external audit should be re-tendered. The external audit was last put out to competitive tender in 1999 when the present auditor was appointed. In both 2005 and 2006, the Committee formally considered the need to re-tender the external audit service and concluded that, given the significant changes in accounting and regulatory requirements, the interests of the Company were better served by retaining the existing auditor through a period of transition. In addition, the Committee concluded that there was nothing in the performance of the auditor requiring a change, except a rotation of audit partner, in line with the Auditing Practices Board Ethical Statements and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which the Group is effecting following approval of the 2006 Annual Report. During the year, the Committee assessed the qualification, expertise and resources, effectiveness and independence of the external auditor. In addition to the questioning of the external auditor and the Group Finance Director, which is a regular feature of meetings, the review of the effectiveness of the external audit process was conducted through a questionnaire-based exercise administered by Group-wide Internal Audit, supplemented by interviews with senior finance staff and Committee members. For the year ended 31 December 2006, the Committee approved fees of £10.1 million for audit services and other services supplied by its auditor pursuant to relevant legislation. In addition, the Committee approved other fees of £2.4 million, not related to audit work, and in accordance with the Group’s Auditor Independence Policy, these fees were approved prior to work commencing. These non-audit related fees amounted to 19 per cent of total fees paid to its auditor, KPMG Audit Plc. The Committee reviewed the non-audit services being provided to the Group by its auditor at regular intervals in 2006. These services primarily related to comfort and attestation letters, to assurance services associated with the implementation of Sarbanes-Oxley, to accounting and regulatory requirements, and to corporate finance transactions. Further information is provided in note I4 on page 235. Financial reporting The Group Audit Committee reviewed the interim and annual financial statements before their submission to the Board, paying particular attention to critical accounting policies and practices and any changes in them; decisions requiring a major element of judgement; unusual transactions; clarity of disclosures; significant Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 75 Nomination Committee report Sir David Clementi FCA MBA (Chairman) Bridget Macaskill James Ross The Nomination Committee is comprised exclusively of independent non-executive directors and the Chairman. The Group Chief Executive is also closely involved in the work of the Committee and is invited to attend and contribute to meetings of the Committee. The Committee meets as required to consider candidates for appointment to the Board and to make recommendations to the Board in respect of those candidates. The Committee, in consultation with the Board, evaluates the balance of skills, knowledge and experience on the Board and makes recommendations regarding appointments based on merit and against objective criteria and the requirements of the Group’s business. In appropriate cases, search consultants are used to identify suitable candidates. During 2006, the Committee held four meetings resulting in the appointment by the Board of Lord Turnbull as a non-executive director on 18 May 2006, and Barry Stowe as an executive director on 1 November 2006. Full biographical details of these new directors are set out on pages 80 and 81. During the year, the Nomination Committee continued the search for additional non-executive directors and employed professional search consultants to oversee the initial process. This process is ongoing. Board Committees – terms of reference The full terms of reference of the Group Audit, Remuneration and Nomination Committees are available on the Company’s website at www.prudential.co.uk/prudential-plc/aboutpru/ corporategovernance/boardcommittees/ Hard copies may be obtained upon written request to the Company Secretary at the Company’s registered office. Directors’ report: Corporate governance Corporate governance report Corporate governance report continued audit adjustments; the going concern assumption; compliance with accounting standards; and compliance with obligations under the Code and other applicable laws and regulations. In addition, the Committee is regularly briefed by senior management on developments in International Financial Reporting Standards. Confidential reporting At each meeting, the Committee received and reviewed a report on calls to the confidential reporting line, which is made available to employees to enable them to communicate confidentially on matters of concern, and actions taken in response to these calls. The Committee also considered whether any internal control implications arose from communications received. No internal control implications were raised from calls to the confidential helpline. Audit committee effectiveness During the year, the Group Audit Committee undertook a formal review of its own effectiveness and the Committee is satisfied, based on the findings of this review, that it had been operating as an effective audit committee, meeting all applicable legal and regulatory requirements. Further reviews of the effectiveness of the Committee will be undertaken annually. Remuneration Committee report Bridget Macaskill (Chairman) Keki Dadiseth FCA Michael Garrett Roberto Mendoza Full biographical details of the members of the Remuneration Committee, including their relevant experience, are set out on pages 80 and 81. The Remuneration Committee is comprised exclusively of independent non-executive directors of the Company. While the Chairman and Group Chief Executive are not members, they attend meetings unless they have a conflict of interest. The Remuneration Committee normally has scheduled meetings at least three times a year and a number of additional meetings, as required, to review remuneration policy and the application of that policy. The Remuneration Committee determines the remuneration packages of the Chairman and executive directors, and monitors the level and structure of remuneration for a defined population of senior management as determined by the Board. The Committee agreed principles for the level and structure of remuneration for this population. During 2006, a total of nine meetings were held. In framing its remuneration policy, the Committee has given full consideration to the provisions of Schedule A to the Code. The directors’ remuneration report prepared by the Board is set out in full on pages 83 to 95. In preparing the report, the Board has followed the provisions of the Code, the Listing Rules of the Financial Services Authority, and the Companies Act 1985 as amended from time to time, in particular by The Directors’ Remuneration Report Regulations 2002. Except in relation to the remuneration of the Group Chief Executive, when only the Chairman is consulted, the Remuneration Committee consults the Chairman and the Group Chief Executive about the Committee’s proposals relating to the remuneration of all executive directors. The Committee has access to professional advice inside and outside the Company. 76 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Directors’ report: Corporate governance Corporate governance report Attendance at Board and Committee meetings Directors’ independence, development and re-election The number of full Board and Committee meetings attended by each director during 2006 was as follows: Committee Audit Remuneration Committee Nomination Committee Meetings*** Meetings Full Board Meetings* No. of meetings in year 11 Sir David Clementi Philip Broadley Keki Dadiseth1 Michael Garrett2 Bridget Macaskill3 Clark Manning4 Michael McLintock5 Roberto Mendoza Mark Norbom6 Kathleen O’Donovan7 Nick Prettejohn James Ross Rob Rowley8 Barry Stowe9 Mark Tucker Lord Turnbull10 11 (11) 11 (11) 9 (11) 10 (11) 9 (11) 10 (11) 9 (11) 11 (11) 8 (11) 10 (11) 11 (11) 11 (11) 6 (6) 2 (2) 11 (11) 5 (5) Meetings** 9 n/a n/a 3 (9) n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 9 (9) n/a 9 (9) 4 (4) n/a n/a n/a 9 n/a n/a 8 (9) 9 (9) 9 (9) n/a n/a 9 (9) n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 4 4 (4) n/a n/a n/a 4 (4) n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 4 (4) 2 (2) n/a n/a n/a Figures in brackets indicate the maximum number of meetings which the individual could have attended in the period in which she/he was a Board or Committee member. *During 2006 there were nine scheduled Board meetings and two additional Board meetings. **During 2006 there were eight scheduled Audit Committee meetings and one additional meeting. ***During 2006 there were three scheduled Remuneration Committee meetings and six additional meetings. 1. Unable to attend two scheduled Board meetings and certain Audit and Remuneration Committee meetings due to illness and serious illness of a member of his immediate family. 2. Unable to attend one scheduled Board meeting due to a family bereavement. 3. Unable to attend one scheduled and one additional Board meeting held on consecutive days due to a family bereavement. 4. Attended all scheduled meetings, but was unable to attend one of the additional Board meetings due to a prior commitment. 5. Unable to attend one scheduled and one additional Board meeting due to illness. 6. Ceased to be a director on 14 December 2006 but not required to attend Board or Board Committee meetings on or after 21 September 2006. In addition, was unable to attend one earlier additional meeting due to a prior commitment. 7. Unable to attend one scheduled Board meeting due to a long-standing prior commitment. 8. Ceased to be a director on 18 May 2006. 9. Appointed as a director on 1 November 2006. 10. Appointed as a director on 18 May 2006. Independent professional advice The Board has approved a procedure whereby directors have the right in furtherance of their duties to seek independent professional advice at the Company’s expense. Copies of any instructions and advice given by an independent professional adviser to a director are supplied by the director to the Company Secretary who will, where appropriate, circulate to other directors sufficient information to ensure that other members of the Board are kept informed on issues arising which affect the Company or any of its subsidiaries. The Chairman was independent on appointment. Throughout the year all non-executive directors were considered by the Board to be independent in character and judgement. No non-executive director: • has been an employee of the Group within the last five years; • has, or has had within the last three years, a material business relationship with the Group; • receives remuneration from the Group other than a director’s fee; • has close family ties with any of the Group’s advisers, directors or senior employees; • represents a significant shareholder; or • has served on the Board for more than nine years. During the year to 28 February 2006, cross-directorships existed with Roberto Mendoza and Philip Broadley who both sat on the boards of Egg plc and Egg Banking plc (Egg), the Company’s subsidiaries. Egg plc had its own listing on the London Stock Exchange until 20 February 2006. The Board does not consider that this relationship in any way affected Mr Mendoza’s status as an independent director of the Company, as both Mr Broadley and Mr Mendoza disclosed their interests as director and Chairman of Egg respectively where appropriate. Egg plc became a wholly- owned subsidiary of the Company on 16 May 2006, and on 29 January 2007 the Company announced that it had entered into a binding agreement to sell Egg Banking plc. During the year, Keki Dadiseth was appointed as a non-executive director of ICICI Prudential Life Insurance Company Limited, an Indian company which is owned 26 per cent by Prudential, and of Prudential ICICI Trust Limited, an Indian company which is owned 49 per cent by Prudential. The Board does not consider that these appointments in any way affect Mr Dadiseth’s status as an independent director of Prudential. The Group is one of the UK’s largest institutional investors and the Board does not believe that this situation compromises the independence of those non-executive directors who are also on the boards of companies in which the Group has a shareholding. The Board also believes that such shareholdings should not preclude the Company from having the most appropriate and highest calibre non-executive directors. The term for which a non-executive director is appointed is usually an initial three-year term, following their election by shareholders at the first Annual General Meeting after their appointment. Their appointment is reviewed towards the end of this period against performance and the requirements of the Group’s businesses. The terms and conditions of appointment of non-executive directors are available for inspection at the Company’s registered office during normal business hours and at the Annual General Meeting. All directors are required to submit themselves for election at the first Annual General Meeting following their appointment by the Board, and for re-election at subsequent Annual General Meetings at least every three years, and also when reaching the age of 70. The Company Secretary supports the Chairman in providing tailored induction programmes for new directors and on-going training for all directors. On appointment, all directors embark upon a wide-ranging induction programme covering, amongst Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 77 Directors’ report: Corporate governance Corporate governance report Corporate governance report continued other things, the principal bases of accounting for the Group’s results, the role of the audit committee and the ambit of the internal audit function. In addition, they receive detailed briefings on the Group’s principal businesses, its product range, the markets in which it operates and the overall competitive environment. Other areas addressed include legal issues affecting directors of financial services companies, the Group’s governance arrangements, its investor relations programme, as well as its remuneration policies. A programme of on-going professional development was undertaken for all directors in 2006, which covered a number of sector-specific and business issues as well as legal, accounting and regulatory changes and developments. A cornerstone of the programme was a series of presentations made to the Board by the Jackson and PPM America management teams on the US businesses and future market opportunities, during the Board visit to Chicago and Lansing, Michigan, in June 2006. A further series of presentations was also given to the Board in November 2006 on the Egg business, when the Board visited Egg’s offices in Derby. Throughout their period in office, directors are continually updated on the Group’s businesses and the regulatory and industry-specific environments in which they operate. These updates can be in the form of written reports to the Board or meetings with senior executives and, where appropriate, external sources. Directors are also advised on appointment of their legal and other duties and obligations as a director of a UK-listed company both in writing and in face-to-face meetings with the Company Secretary. Performance evaluation An evaluation was carried out of the performance of the Board and its Committees for the year 2006, in line with the requirements of the Code. The aim was to improve the effectiveness of the Board and its Committees and the Group’s performance. The evaluation of the Board as a whole and of the Chairman was carried out by an independent consultant, following a briefing by the Chairman and the Senior Independent Director. Interviews were conducted with each Board member and the Company Secretary by the independent consultant. The interview questions were based on the Code and sought views on the effectiveness of the Board as a whole, the Chairman’s performance, and processes for making specific decisions during the year. The independent consultant prepared its report based on the interviews with directors. The overall results of the evaluation were presented to and reviewed by the Board in February 2007. The Board considered the report of the independent consultant and, without the Chairman present, met under the chairmanship of the Senior Independent Director to review the performance of the Chairman. In addition, the performance of the non-executive directors and the Group Chief Executive was evaluated by the Chairman in individual meetings. The Group Chief Executive individually appraised the performance of each of the executive directors. Relations with shareholders As a major institutional investor, the Company is acutely aware of the importance of maintaining good relations with its shareholders. The Company regularly holds discussions with major shareholders and a programme of meetings took place during 2006. Board members also regularly receive copies of the latest analysts’ and 78 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 brokers’ reports on the Company and the sector, to further develop their knowledge and understanding of external views about the Company. The Chairman and some of the non-executive directors provided feedback to the Board on issues raised with them by major shareholders. Should major shareholders wish to meet newly appointed directors they are welcome to do so. Annual General Meeting The Annual General Meeting will be held in the Churchill Auditorium at The Queen Elizabeth II Centre, Broad Sanctuary, Westminster, London SW1P 3EE on 17 May 2007 at 11.00am. The Company believes the Annual General Meeting is an important forum for both institutional and private shareholders and encourages attendance by all its shareholders. At its Annual General Meeting in 2006, the Company introduced voting on a poll on all resolutions, and the voting results, which included all votes cast for and against each resolution at the meeting, and all proxies lodged prior to the meeting, were indicated at the meeting and published on the Company’s website as soon as practicable after the meeting. The Company also disclosed the number of votes withheld at the meeting and on its website. This practice provides shareholders present with sufficient information regarding the level of support and opposition to each resolution, and ensures all votes cast either at the meeting or through proxies are included in the result. As with last year’s meeting, shareholders will again be given the opportunity to put questions to the Board on matters relating to the Group’s operation and performance. Major shareholders The number of accounts on the share register at 31 December 2006 was 79,881 (2005: 60,942). Further information about shareholdings in the Company is given on page 282. As at 14 March 2007, the Company had received notification in accordance with Rule 5.1.2 R of the UK Listing Authority’s Disclosure and Transparency Rules from Legal & General Investment Management Limited and Barclays PLC of holdings of 4.50 per cent and 3.02 per cent respectively of the Company’s ordinary share capital at the time of notification. The shareholder information section on pages 282 and 283 details further information that may be of interest to shareholders. Authority to purchase own shares At the Annual General Meeting in 2006, shareholders granted authority to the directors for the purchase by the Company of its own shares in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Companies Act 1985. This authority will expire at the end of the Annual General Meeting to be held in 2007 or 18 months from the date granted, whichever is earlier. Shares issued under authority to disapply pre-emption rights Details of shares issued during 2006 and 2005 are given in note H11 on page 211. Shares issued in 2004 disapplying pre-emption rights amounted to 567,121, which were issued under the Group’s share option schemes. The total of shares issued disapplying pre-emption rights amounted to less than 7.5 per cent over the last three years. Financial reporting The directors have a duty to report to shareholders on the performance and financial position of the Group and are responsible Directors’ report: Corporate governance Corporate governance report for preparing the financial statements on pages 99 to 249 and the supplementary information on pages 252 to 280. It is the responsibility of the auditor to form independent opinions, based on its audit of the financial statements and of the EEV basis supplementary information, and to report its opinions to the Company’s shareholders and to the Company respectively. Its opinions are given on pages 251 and 281. Company law requires the directors to prepare financial statements for each financial year which give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Company and of the Group. The criteria applied in the preparation of the financial statements are set out in the statement of directors’ responsibilities on page 250. After making appropriate enquiries, the directors consider that the Group has adequate resources to continue its operations for the forseeable future. The directors therefore continue to use the going concern basis in preparing the financial statements. Disclosure of information to auditor The directors who held office at the date of approval of this directors’ report confirm that, so far as they are each aware, there is no relevant audit information of which the Company’s auditor is unaware; and each director has taken all the steps that he or she ought to have taken as a director to make himself or herself aware of any relevant audit information and to establish that the Company’s auditor is aware of that information. Auditor A resolution for the re-appointment of KPMG Audit Plc as auditor of the Company until the end of the 2008 Annual General Meeting will be put to the Annual General Meeting on 17 May 2007. Risk management and internal control The Board has overall responsibility for the Group’s system of internal control, and for reviewing its effectiveness. All business units are required to confirm annually that they have undertaken risk management during the year as required by the Group Risk Framework, and that they have reviewed the effectiveness of the systems of internal control. The results of this review are reported to and reviewed by the Group Audit Committee and the Board, and it was confirmed that effective processes of internal control and risk management as required by the Group Risk Framework were in place throughout the period covered by this report, and that they complied with the revised guidance on the Combined Code issued in October 2005 (the Turnbull guidance). Business unit internal audit teams execute risk-based audit plans throughout the Group, from which all significant issues are reported to the Group Audit Committee as they arise. The procedures for the management of risk and the systems of internal control operated by the Group are described in more detail within the risk management section on pages 54 to 66. In line with the guidance on the Combined Code, the certification provided above does not apply to certain material joint ventures where the Group does not exercise full management control. In these cases, the Group satisfies itself on the adequacy of the policies adopted and their operation through the year by its representation in the joint ventures’ boards. In line with the Group Risk Framework and as set out within the section on risk governance on pages 54 to 57, the management of the relevant business unit discusses material issues and risks and includes them, where appropriate, in the regular risk reports to the Group. US corporate governance compliance The Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 (the Act) was passed by the US Congress in July 2002 to establish new or enhanced standards for corporate accountability in the US. As a result of the listing of its securities on the New York Stock Exchange, the Company is required to comply with the relevant provisions of the Act as they apply to foreign private issuers, and has adopted procedures to ensure this is the case. In particular, in relation to Section 302 of the Act, which covers disclosure controls and procedures, a Disclosure Committee has been established reporting to the Group Chief Executive, chaired by the Group Finance Director and comprising members of senior management. The objectives of this Committee are to: • assist the Group Chief Executive and the Group Finance Director in designing, implementing and periodically evaluating the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures; • monitor compliance with the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures; • review and provide advice to the Group Chief Executive and Group Finance Director with regard to the scope and content of all public disclosures made by the Company which are of material significance to the market or investors; and • review and consider, and where applicable follow up on, matters raised by other components of the disclosure process, including matters to be raised with the Group Audit Committee, the internal auditor or the external auditor of the Company’s internal controls to the extent they are relevant to the disclosure process. In discharging these objectives, the Committee helps to support the certifications by the Group Chief Executive and the Group Finance Director of the effectiveness of disclosure procedures and controls required by Section 302 of the Act. The provisions of Section 404 of the Act require the Company’s management to report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting in its annual report on Form 20-F, which is filed with the US Securities and Exchange Commission. This report on the effectiveness of internal control is required for the first time in respect of the year ended 31 December 2006, and in common with other companies which have to comply with this requirement, the Group has undertaken a significant project to document and test its internal controls over financial reporting in the format required by the Act. The first annual assessment and related report from the external auditor will be included in the Group’s annual report on Form 20-F that will be published in the coming months. In addition, the Disclosure Committee has regard to the UK Listing Regime, and evaluates whether or not a particular matter requires disclosure to the market. On behalf of the Board of directors Philip Broadley Group Finance Director 14 March 2007 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 79 Directors’ report: Corporate governance Board of directors Board of directors Chairman Executive directors 1 2 5 3 6 4 7 1. Sir David Clementi FCA MBA Chairman and Chairman of the Nomination Committee Sir David Clementi has been Chairman of Prudential since December 2002. In 2005, he was appointed as President of the Investment Property Forum. In 2003, he joined the Financial Services Authority’s Financial Capability Steering Group, and was appointed by the Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs to carry out a review of the regulation of legal services in England and Wales, which was completed in 2004. In 2003, he also joined the Financial Reporting Council, and became a non- executive director of Rio Tinto plc. He is also a board member of the Royal Opera House. From 1997 to 2002 he was Deputy Governor of the Bank of England. During this time, he served as a member of the Monetary Policy Committee and as a non-executive director of the Financial Services Authority. From 1975 to 1997 he worked for the Kleinwort Benson Group, latterly as Chief Executive. 2. Mark Tucker ACA Group Chief Executive Mark Tucker was re-appointed as an executive director in May 2005, when he also became Group Chief Executive. From May 2004 to March 2005 he was Group Finance Director, HBOS plc and director of Halifax plc. Previously, he was an executive director of Prudential from 1999 to 2003, and from 1993 to 2003 he was Chief Executive of Prudential Corporation Asia, and also held senior positions in Prudential’s businesses in the UK and the US. He first joined Prudential in 1986, having previously been a tax consultant at PriceWaterhouse UK in London. 3. Philip Broadley FCA Group Finance Director Philip Broadley has been an executive director of Prudential and Group Finance Director since May 2000. He is currently Chairman of the 100 Group of Finance Directors and a member of the Insurance Advisory Group of the International Accounting Standards Board. He is also President of the Przezornosc Charitable Foundation, which has been established in Poland in recognition of former policyholders with whom the Company lost contact. Previously, he was with the UK firm of Arthur Andersen, where he became a partner in 1993. 4. Clark Manning FSA MAAA Executive director Clark Manning has been an executive director of Prudential since January 2002. He is also President and Chief Executive Officer of Jackson National Life Insurance Company. He was previously Chief Operating Officer, Senior Vice President and Chief Actuary of Jackson National Life Insurance Company, which he joined in 1995. Prior to that, he was Senior Vice President and Chief Actuary for SunAmerica Inc, and prior to that Consulting Actuary at Milliman & Robertson Inc. He has more than 25 years’ experience in the life insurance industry, and holds both a bachelor’s degree in actuarial science and an MBA from the University of Texas. He also holds professional designations of Fellow of the Society of Actuaries (FSA) and Member of the American Academy of Actuaries (MAAA). 5. Michael McLintock Executive director Michael McLintock has been an executive director of Prudential since September 2000. He is also Chief Executive of M&G, a position he held at the time of M&G’s acquisition by Prudential in 1999. He joined M&G in 1992. He is also a non-executive director of Close Brothers Group plc. 6. Nick Prettejohn Executive director Nick Prettejohn has been an executive director of Prudential and Chief Executive, Prudential UK and Europe since 1 January 2006. He is also a board member of the ABI, Deputy Chairman of the Financial Services Practitioner Panel, and a board member of the Royal Opera House. Previously, he was Chief Executive of Lloyd’s of London from 1999 until 2005. He joined the Corporation of Lloyd’s in 1995 as Head of Strategy, and played a key role in the Reconstruction and Renewal process, which reorganised Lloyd’s after the losses of the late 1980s and early 1990s. Following the successful completion of the reorganisation in 1996, he became Managing Director of Lloyd’s Business Development Unit and in 1998 he also assumed responsibility for Lloyd’s North America business unit. Prior to his appointment to Lloyd’s, he was responsible for corporate strategy at National Freight Corporation plc, and prior to that he was a partner at management consultants Bain and Co and a director of private equity company Apax Partners. 7. Barry Stowe Executive director Barry Stowe has been an executive director of Prudential since 1 November 2006, and Chief Executive, Prudential Corporation Asia since 9 October 2006. Previously, he was President, Accident & Health Worldwide for AIG Life Companies. He joined AIG in 1995, and prior to that was President and CEO of NISUS, a subsidiary of Pan-American Life, from 1992-1995. Prior to NISUS, Barry spent 12 years at Willis Corroon in the US. 8. Keki Dadiseth FCA Independent non-executive director and member of the Audit and Remuneration Committee Keki Dadiseth has been an independent non- executive director of Prudential since April 2005. During 2006, he was appointed as a non-executive director of ICICI Prudential Life Assurance Company Limited and Prudential ICICI Trust Limited. He is also a member of the Advisory Board of Marsh & McLennan Companies Inc. and an International Advisor to Goldman Sachs. In addition, he is a director of Nicholas Piramal Limited, Siemens Limited, Britannia Industries Limited and The Indian Hotels Company Limited, all quoted on the Bombay Stock Exchange. He is also a director of the Indian School of Business and acts as a trustee of a number of Indian charities. Before he retired from Unilever in 2005, he was Director, Home and Personal Care, responsible for the HPC business of Unilever worldwide, a Board member of Unilever 80 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Directors’ report: Corporate governance Board of directors Non-executive directors 8 12 9 13 11 10 14 PLC and Unilever N.V. and a member of Unilever’s Executive Committee. He joined Hindustan Lever Ltd in India in 1973. 9. Michael Garrett Independent non-executive director and member of the Remuneration Committee Michael Garrett has been an independent non- executive director of Prudential since September 2004. He worked for Nestlé from 1961, becoming Head of Japan (1990 - 1993), and then Zone Director and Member of the Executive Board, responsible for Asia and Oceania, and in 1996 his responsibilities were expanded to include Africa and the Middle East. He retired as Executive Vice President of Nestlé in 2005. In addition, he served the Government of Australia as Chairman of the Food Industry Council and as a Member of the Industry Council of Australia, and was also member of the Advisory Committee for an APEC (Asia- Pacific Economic Cooperation) Food System, a Member of The Turkish Prime Minister’s Advisory Group and the WTO (World Trade Organization) Business Advisory Council in Switzerland. He remains a director of Nestlé companies in India and Japan, and was appointed Chairman of the Evian Group in 2001, a think tank and forum for dialogue promoting free trade. He also serves as a non- executive director on the Boards of the Bobst Group Switzerland and Hasbro Inc. in the US, and is a member of the Finance and Performance Review Committee of The Prince of Wales International Business Leaders Forum (IBLF). 10. Bridget Macaskill Independent non-executive director, Chairman of the Remuneration Committee and member of the Nomination Committee Bridget Macaskill has been an independent non- executive director of Prudential since September 2003. She rejoined the Board of Prudential having previously resigned due to a potential conflict of interest in 2001. She has been a member of the Remuneration Committee since 2003 and became Chairman of the Remuneration Committee on 18 May 2006. She is a non-executive director of the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae), and from 1 April 2007 she will also serve as a non-executive director on the board of Scottish & Newcastle PLC. She was previously a non-executive director of J Sainsbury Plc. Prior to that she spent 18 years at OppenheimerFunds Inc, a major New York based investment management company, the final 10 years of which she was Chief Executive Officer. 11. Roberto Mendoza Independent non-executive director and member of the Remuneration Committee Roberto Mendoza has been an independent non- executive director of Prudential since May 2000. He served as Chairman of the Remuneration Committee from 2002 until 18 May 2006. He is also Chairman of the Trinsum Group, and a non- executive director of Western Union Inc and of Paris Re. Previously, he was the non-executive Chairman of Egg plc and a non-executive director of The BOC Group plc, and prior to that he was Vice Chairman and director of JP Morgan & Co. Inc., a non-executive director of Reuters Group PLC, and a managing director of Goldman Sachs. 12. Kathleen O’Donovan ACA Independent non-executive director and Chairman of the Audit Committee Kathleen O’Donovan has been an independent non- executive director of Prudential since May 2003. She has been a member of the Audit Committee since 2003 and became Chairman of the Audit Committee on 18 May 2006. She is a non-executive director and Chairman of the Audit Committee of Great Portland Estates PLC and a non-executive director of ARM Holdings plc. She is also Chairman of the Invensys Pension Scheme. Previously, she was a non-executive director and Chairman of the Audit Committees of the EMI Group plc and the Court of the Bank of England, and a non-executive director of O2 plc. Prior to that, she was Chief Financial Officer of BTR and Invensys, and before that she was a partner at Ernst & Young. 13. James Ross Senior independent non-executive director and member of the Audit and Nomination Committee James Ross has been an independent non- executive director since May 2004 and the Senior Independent Director since May 2006. He holds non-executive directorships with McGraw Hill and Datacard in the United States and Schneider Electric in France. He is also Chairman of the Leadership Foundation for Higher Education. He was previously Chairman of National Grid plc and Littlewoods plc. He was also Chief Executive of Cable and Wireless plc and Chairman and Chief Executive of BP America Inc., and a Managing Director of the British Petroleum Company plc. 14. Lord Turnbull KCB CVO Independent non-executive director and member of the Audit Committee Lord Turnbull has been an independent non- executive director of Prudential since 18 May 2006, and a member of the Audit Committee since 1 January 2007. He entered the House of Lords as a Life Peer in 2005. In 2002 he became Secretary of the Cabinet and Head of the Home Civil Service until he retired in 2005. Prior to that, he held a number of positions in the civil service, including Permanent Secretary at HM Treasury; Permanent Secretary at the Department of the Environment (later Environment, Transport and the Regions); Private Secretary (Economics) to the Prime Minister; and Principal Private Secretary to Margaret Thatcher and then John Major. He joined HM Treasury in 1970. Lord Turnbull is a non-executive director of Frontier Economics Ltd, The British Land Company PLC and the Arup Group. He also works part-time as a Senior Adviser to the London partners of Booz Allen Hamilton (UK). Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 81 Other report to shareholders 83 Directors’ remuneration report 82 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 During last year, the Committee focused on consulting with investors leading up to the Annual General Meeting and, in the latter part of the year, on ensuring the remuneration principles were operated in practice. This year, the Committee will continue to keep the remuneration policy under review to ensure it is effectively aligned with the performance and development of Prudential’s business. The Committee will consult with major shareholders before making any material changes. I am confident the Committee’s approach aligns with shareholder interests, as well as rewarding Prudential’s executive directors appropriately for their performance. Bridget Macaskill Chairman, Remuneration Committee 14 March 2007 The terms of reference of the Remuneration Committee are available on the Company’s website and a copy may be obtained from the Company Secretary. Other report to shareholders Directors’ remuneration report Directors’ remuneration report For year ended 31 December 2006 Dear Shareholders, I am pleased to present the 2006 directors’ remuneration report for Prudential. Last year, following an extensive period of consultation, we launched two new Long Term Incentive Plans, which over 95 per cent of you approved. These plans are now a key part of Prudential’s remuneration policy. The primary focus of our remuneration policy is to attract, motivate and retain executives of the highest calibre and provide rewards, in relation to individual contributions, for enhancing shareholder value. The comprehensive review of remuneration which we undertook last year reaffirmed a strong set of remuneration principles: • a high proportion of total remuneration will be delivered through performance-related reward; • the total remuneration package for each executive director will be set in relation to the relevant local employment market; • a significant element of performance-related reward will be provided in the form of shares; • performance for business unit executives will be measured at both a business unit and Group level; and • performance measures will include both absolute financial measures and comparative measures as appropriate, to provide a clear alignment between the creation of shareholder value and reward. These principles will continue to provide a solid basis for the Remuneration Committee in setting the remuneration policy and the rewards for Prudential’s executive directors. The members of the Remuneration Committee during 2006, listed below, are all independent non-executive directors: Bridget Macaskill (Chairman – member throughout 2006, Chairman since 18 May 2006). Roberto Mendoza (member throughout 2006, Chairman until 18 May 2006). Keki Dadiseth Michael Garrett During last year, the Committee sought the views and assistance of Priscilla Vaccasin, Group Human Resources Director. The Committee also requested the assistance of Deloitte & Touche in their capacity to provide consultancy and market data, Towers Perrin and McLagan in their capacity to provide market data, and Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer and Slaughter and May in their capacity to provide advice on legal matters. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 83 Other report to shareholders Directors’ remuneration report Directors’ remuneration report continued For year ended 31 December 2006 Compliance with the Directors’ Remuneration Regulations This report has been approved by the Board and, as required by The Directors’ Remuneration Report Regulations 2002 (the Regulations), a resolution will be put to shareholders at the Annual General Meeting inviting them to consider and approve it. This report complies with the requirements of the Regulations and KPMG Audit Plc have audited the sections contained on pages 89 to 95, as required by the Companies Act 1985. Compliance with the Combined Code During the year, the Company has complied with Schedule A and Schedule B and the provisions relating to the Principles of Good Governance and Code of Best Practice of the Combined Code then in force regarding directors’ remuneration. Remuneration policy To achieve the aims of the Company’s remuneration policy, Prudential must continue to use remuneration practices relevant to the different markets in which the Company does business around the world. The Remuneration Committee considers remuneration within the context of the UK’s regulatory framework and shareholder views, and is guided by UK corporate governance standards. Elements of remuneration Total remuneration for our executive directors is comprised of the elements set out below. Element Salary Annual bonus Purpose Measure Provides the guaranteed element of pay necessary to recruit and retain the best people for our business Rewards achievement of business results and objectives which develop the business Scope of role and market position, as well as individual’s contribution and experience Group, business unit and individual performance Long term incentive Rewards superior performance related to shareholder value Group – relative TSR performance against peer group Business – internal growth measures Pension Provides income in retirement, where needed for the remuneration package to be competitive Total remuneration levels for executive directors are set by reference to levels in their relevant markets and all pay data is externally provided. Prudential’s remuneration structure for 2007 is summarised in the following table. Director Role Philip Broadley Clark Manning1 Michael McLintock2 Nick Prettejohn Barry Stowe Mark Tucker Group Finance Director President & CEO Jackson National Life Insurance Company Chief Executive M&G Chief Executive Prudential UK & Europe Chief Executive Prudential Corporation Asia Group Chief Executive Long Term Incentives Group Performance Share Plan Business Unit Performance Plan Annual Bonus Plan Target 50% Max Max 110% 160% Max n/a 100% 300%2 50% 50% 75% 120% 500%2 110% 110% 125% 230% 100%2 130% 130% 200% 230% Cash LTIP2 130% 130% n/a Annual salary from 1 January 2007 £567,100 $1,000,000 £320,000 £615,250 £500,000 £907,200 Annual Bonus Plan – Performance driven, paid in cash up to target, with payment for performance above target in the form of deferred shares. Bonuses are based on a combination of Group and Business unit financial measures, and the individual strategic objectives set for each director. Group Performance Share Plan – Share-based plan, driven by Total Shareholder Return (TSR) out-performance of an index comprised of peer companies over three years. Business Unit Performance Plan – Share and cash-based plan (split 50/50), driven by compound annual growth in Shareholder Capital Value (SCV) over three years with stretch targets for each region. Notes 1. Clark Manning is also eligible to receive an annual bonus which provides for a percentage share of a bonus pool based on the profits of Jackson National Life Insurance Company (Jackson). He is additionally eligible to participate in a US tax qualified all-employee profit sharing plan. 2. The annual bonus plan levels shown for Michael McLintock are for 2006. His remuneration arrangements will be reviewed with investors in 2007 (see section on Michael McLintock on page 86). All outstanding long-term awards held by the executive directors are detailed on pages 90 to 92. 84 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Other report to shareholders Directors’ remuneration report Salary The Remuneration Committee normally reviews executive directors’ salaries each year on an individual basis. Salaries are reviewed with respect to the relevant market, taking into account total remuneration. Annual incentive plans The annual incentive for executive directors is aligned with the interests of shareholders in that any part of the annual incentive award made for performance above target will be made in the form of a share award. Receipt of these shares is deferred and the shares are normally only released after three years. Dividends accumulate for the benefit of award holders during the deferral period. Bonuses awarded are not pensionable. Annual incentives are based on a combination of Group and business unit financial measures and the individual strategic objectives set for each individual director. Long-term incentive plans Group Performance Share Plan (Group PSP) This Group PSP delivers shares subject to performance over a three-year period. The performance measure for the award is Prudential’s Total Shareholder Return (TSR) performance compared to an index comprised of peer companies. The vesting schedule is set out in the following table and graph. Prudential’s TSR relative to the index at the end of the performance period Less than index return Index return Index return x 110% Index return x 120% Group Performance Share Plan Percentage of award that vests Percentage of award that vests 0% 25% 75% 100% 100 75 50 25 0 100% 110% 120% Extent to which TSR of Prudential exceeds TSR of the index Companies in the index for 2006 were: Aegon, Allianz, Aviva, Axa, Friends Provident, Generali, ING, Legal & General, Manulife and Old Mutual. For 2007, the comparator group consists of the same companies with the addition of Standard Life. To ensure close alignment with our shareholders’ long-term interests, participants will normally be entitled to receive the value of reinvested dividends over the performance period for those shares that vest. The Remuneration Committee must also be satisfied that the quality of the underlying financial performance justifies the level of award delivered at the end of the performance period and may adjust awards accordingly at its discretion. Business Unit Performance Share Plan (BUPP) This plan delivers share and cash-based awards, subject to a three-year performance period. The performance measure under the BUPP is Shareholder Capital Value (SCV) which is shareholders’ capital and reserves on a European Embedded Value (EEV) basis (using the European Embedded Value Principles for reporting adopted by European insurance companies) for each regional business unit. Payouts depend on the increase in SCV over the performance period, the required growth rates under the award being different for each of Prudential’s geographic regions. The vesting schedules are set out in the table below. Compound annual growth in Shareholder Capital Value over three years Percentage of award that vests UK Jackson Asia 0% 30% 75% 100% < 8% 8% 11% 14% < 8% 8% 10% 12% < 15% 15% 22.5% 30% Business Unit Performance Plan Percentage of award that vests 100 75 30 0 0% Threshold Maximum Compound annual growth in Shareholder Capital Value over three years To ensure close alignment with our shareholders’ long-term interests, participants will normally be entitled to receive the value of reinvested dividends over the performance period for those shares that vest. The Remuneration Committee must also be satisfied that the quality of the underlying financial performance justifies the level of award delivered at the end of the performance period and may adjust awards accordingly at its discretion. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 85 Other report to shareholders Directors’ remuneration report Directors’ remuneration report continued For year ended 31 December 2006 Michael McLintock In 2006, Michael McLintock participated in the M&G Chief Executive Long-Term Incentive Plan that provides a cash reward through phantom M&G share awards and options, whose value depends on the profit and fund performance of M&G over the performance period. The change in the phantom share price equals the change in M&G profit, modified up or down by the investment performance of M&G over the performance period. For 2006 the face value of the share award was £225,000. For 2006 the phantom option award had a face value of £367,800. Provided the phantom share options have value, they may be exercised in part or in full during annual exercise periods after three to seven years from the start of the performance period. The Committee has reviewed Michael McLintock’s remuneration against the arrangements in the fund management industry and as a result, during 2007, we will be consulting with our investors regarding his long-term incentives and his remuneration structure for 2007. Any resulting changes will be reported in the 2007 directors’ remuneration report. Pensions arrangements It is the Company’s policy to provide efficient pension vehicles to allow executive directors to save for their retirement and to make appropriate contributions to their retirement savings plans. The level of Company contribution is related to competitive practice in the executive directors’ employment market. The executive director employed in the US is eligible to participate in a 401K approved pension scheme on the same basis as all other US based employees. The executive director employed in Asia is eligible to receive a 25 per cent salary supplement for pension purposes. UK executive directors are offered a combination of HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) approved pension schemes and supplementary provision. Participation in the HMRC approved pension schemes is on the same basis as other employees who joined at the same date, with benefits based on basic salary up to the HMRC earnings cap. For defined benefit schemes, the policy is to retain a notional scheme earnings cap, replicating the HMRC earnings cap, which no longer exists after 6 April 2006 (A-Day). No employees with employment offers after 30 June 2003 were eligible for membership of the defined benefit schemes. Changes to UK pensions regulations took effect from A-Day. Executive directors were not compensated for the effects of any change in their taxation position as a result of these changes. The Company reviewed its policy in 2006 and for future UK executive director appointments, its policy is to provide a simple salary supplement of 25 per cent of salary. This will include, where relevant, any Company contributions to the staff defined contribution pension plan, which UK executive directors would be eligible to join. This plan has no salary cap. After A-Day, the policy is to discontinue further contributions to Funded Unapproved Retirement Benefit Schemes (FURBS) which were provided for some UK executive directors before this date. The application of this policy to executive directors is described on pages 94 and 95. 86 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Shareholding guidelines Executive directors should hold a substantial number of shares according to the following schedule. The executive directors will be encouraged to build up their shareholding over a five-year period. Group Chief Executive and Chief Executive M&G: 2 x salary (interim target of 1 x salary after three years) Other executive directors: 1 x salary Shares earned and deferred under the annual incentive plan are included in the guideline. At least half the shares released from long-term incentive awards after tax should be retained by the executive director until the guideline is met. Service contracts Chairman’s letter of appointment and benefits The Chairman, Sir David Clementi, is paid an annual fee and the contractual notice periods are 12 months from either party. The Chairman participates in a medical insurance scheme, has life assurance cover and has the use of a car and driver. He is entitled to a supplement to his fees, intended for pension purposes. He is not a member of any Group pension scheme providing retirement benefits. Directors’ service contracts and letters of appointment Executive directors have contracts that terminate on their normal retirement date. Following the new Age Discrimination legislation in the UK, the normal retirement date for the executive directors except Clark Manning was changed to the date of their 65th birthday. The normal retirement date for Clark Manning is the date of his 60th birthday. The normal notice of termination the Company is required to give executive directors is 12 months, although for newly appointed directors there may be an initial contractual period of up to two years before the 12 months’ notice period applies. When considering termination of service contracts, the Remuneration Committee will have regard to the specific circumstances of each case, including a director’s obligation to mitigate his loss. Philip Broadley Clark Manning Michael McLintock Nick Prettejohn Barry Stowe Mark Tucker Former executive director Mark Norbom Date of contract 12 April 2000 7 May 2002 21 November 2001 26 September 2005 18 October 2006 24 March 2005 Notice period to the Company Notice period from the Company 12 months 12 months 12 months* 12 months* 12 months 12 months 12 months 12 months 6 months 12 months 12 months 12 months 23 December 2003 12 months 12 months *The contract for Clark Manning is a renewable one-year fixed-term contract. The contract is renewable automatically upon the same terms and conditions unless the Company or Clark Manning gives at least 90 days’ notice prior to the end of the relevant term. In the case of the former, Clark Manning would be entitled to continued payment of salary and benefits for the period of one year from the day such notice is delivered to him. Payments of Clark Manning’s salary during the period following the termination of employment would be reduced by the amount of compensation earned by him from any subsequent employer or from any person for whom he performs services. Benefits to be provided during such period would also be cancelled to the extent that comparable benefits were available to him from these alternative sources. Other report to shareholders Directors’ remuneration report Barry Stowe joined Prudential on 26 September 2006. In order to compensate him for the loss of substantial amounts of outstanding long-term remuneration, he was awarded rights to Prudential plc American Depositary Receipts (ADRs) that vest as set out below: Vesting date 1 May 2007 1 May 2008 1 May 2009 1 Sept 2009 1 Jan 2010 1 May 2010 Prudential plc ADRs 3,544 3,544 3,544 14,353 3,544 1,055 Under normal circumstances, releases are conditional on his being employed by Prudential at the date of vesting. If there is a change of control of Prudential he may become entitled to retain any unvested awards. In order to compensate for the loss of share options, Barry Stowe has also been awarded 1,255 Prudential plc ADRs. Mark Norbom’s directorship with Prudential plc ended on 14 December 2006 but he remained in employment until 31 January 2007. Non-executive directors do not have service contracts but are appointed pursuant to letters of appointment with notice periods of six months without liability for compensation. Keki Dadiseth Michael Garrett Bridget Macaskill Roberto Mendoza Kathleen O’Donovan James Ross Lord Turnbull Date of initial Commencement date of appointment current term* by the Board Expiry date of current term 1 April 2005 1 September 2004 1 September 2003 25 May 2000 8 May 2003 6 May 2004 18 May 2006 AGM 2005 AGM 2005 AGM 2004 AGM 2004 AGM 2004 AGM 2005 AGM 2006 AGM 2008 AGM 2008 AGM 2007 AGM 2007 AGM 2007 AGM 2008 AGM 2009 *Under the terms of their letters of appointment, the non-executive directors serve for an initial term of three years following their election by shareholders at the Annual General Meeting after their appointment by the Board. Benefits and protections Executive directors receive certain benefits, principally participation in medical insurance schemes, the provision of a cash allowance for a car (except for Clark Manning), and, in some cases the use of a car and driver and security arrangements. No benefits are pensionable. The executive directors’ pension arrangements and life assurance provisions are set out in the directors’ pensions and life assurance section on pages 94 and 95. Executive directors are eligible to participate in either the Company’s UK or International Savings-Related Share Option Scheme (except for Clark Manning). Options granted under these schemes are not subject to performance conditions. Executive directors are entitled to participate in arrangements in certain M&G investment products on the same terms as available to other members of staff. In addition, the Company provides certain protections for directors and senior managers against personal financial exposure that they may incur in their capacity as such. This includes qualifying third party indemnity provisions (as defined under section 309B of the Companies Act 1985) in force for the benefit of the directors of the Company and of associated companies (as defined under section 309A of the Companies Act 1985), both of which were in force throughout 2006 and are currently in force. Policy on external appointments Subject to the Board’s approval, executive directors are able to accept external appointments as non-executive directors of other organisations. Non-executive directors’ remuneration Non-executive directors are not eligible to participate in annual incentive plans, long-term incentive plans or pension arrangements. Their fees are determined by the Board and reflect their individual responsibilities including committee membership as appropriate. The Board reviews the fees annually and the last change was made in 2006. The basic fee is £55,000 per annum. An additional fee of £25,000 per annum is paid to the Senior Independent Director. The additional Audit Committee chairmanship fee is £40,000 per annum. An additional fee of £15,000 per annum is paid to the other members of the Audit Committee. The additional Remuneration Committee chairmanship fee is £20,000 per annum. An additional fee of £7,500 per annum is paid to the other members of the Remuneration Committee. Annually, the non-executive directors use the net value of £25,000 of their total annual fees to purchase shares in the Company. Shares are purchased each quarter and are held at least until retirement from the Board. For the period he was Chairman of Egg, Roberto Mendoza received a fee of £75,000 per annum. Directors’ shareholdings The current shareholding policy is that as a condition of serving, all executive and non-executive directors are required to have beneficial ownership of 2,500 ordinary shares in the Company. This interest in shares must be acquired within two months of appointment to the Board if the director does not have such an interest upon appointment. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 87 Performance graph The line graph below shows the Total Shareholder Return (TSR) of the Company during the five years from 1 January 2002 to 31 December 2006 against the FTSE 100. Prudential TSR v FTSE 100 Total Returns Index (TRI) Total shareholder return % 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Dec 01 Dec 02 Dec 03 Dec 04 Dec 05 Dec 06 Prudential TSR FTSE 100 TRI Total Shareholder Return over the performance period is the growth in value of a share plus the value of dividends paid, assuming that the dividends are reinvested in the Company’s shares on the day on which they were paid. Other report to shareholders Directors’ remuneration report Directors’ remuneration report continued For year ended 31 December 2006 As stated on page 87, non-executive directors also use a proportion of their fees to purchase additional shares in the Company on a quarterly basis. The interests of directors in ordinary shares of the Company are set out below and include shares acquired under the Share Incentive Plan, the deferred annual incentive awards detailed in the table on other share awards on page 93, and interests in shares awarded on appointment. The interests of directors in shares of the Company include changes between 31 December 2006 and 14 March 2007. All interests are beneficial. Philip Broadley1 Sir David Clementi Keki Dadiseth Michael Garrett Bridget Macaskill Clark Manning Michael McLintock Roberto Mendoza Kathleen O’Donovan Nick Prettejohn James Ross Barry Stowe2 Mark Tucker Lord Turnbull *Or date of appointment if later. 1 Jan 2006* 31 Dec 2006 14 Mar 2007 32,853 23,849 4,012 15,674 12,581 24,953 202,809 140,517 10,185 2,501 8,111 0 134,353 2,500 71,599 33,582 5,676 18,113 14,858 25,589 291,337 215,203 12,331 57,730 10,387 66,678 199,088 3,885 71,666 33,582 5,676 18,113 14,858 25,589 291,337 215,203 12,331 57,730 10,387 66,678 199,088 3,885 Notes 1. The shares in the table include shares purchased under the Prudential Services Limited Share Incentive Plan together with Matching Shares (on a 1:4 basis) that will only be released if the employee remains in employment for three years. For Philip Broadley the total number of Matching Shares at 31 December 2006 was 111. 2. Barry Stowe’s interests in shares are made up of 33,339 American Depositary Receipts (representing 66,678 ordinary shares). The interests of directors in shares of the Company’s subsidiary, Egg plc, which was listed until 20 February 2006, are shown below. During 2006, Egg plc was acquired by Prudential plc on the basis of 0.2237 new Prudential plc shares for each Egg share held, and consequently there were no changes between the year end and 14 March 2007. Philip Broadley Roberto Mendoza Nick Prettejohn 1 Jan 2006 31 Dec 2006 2,610 300,000 312 0 0 0 88 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Other report to shareholders Directors’ remuneration report Directors’ remuneration for 2006 Salary/fees £000 Bonus £000 Other payments £000 Cash supplements for pension Benefits* £000 purposes** £000 Total emoluments 2006 £000 Total emoluments 2005 as reported in 2005 £000 Cash supplements for pension purposes in 2005 £000 Total emoluments 2005 including cash supplements for pension purposes £000 Chairman Sir David Clementi Executive directors Jonathan Bloomer (until 5 May 2005) Philip Broadley (notes 1 and 2) Clark Manning (notes 3 and 4) Michael McLintock (notes 5 and 6) Mark Norbom (until 14 December 2006; notes 7 to 10) Nick Prettejohn (from 1 January 2006; note 11) Barry Stowe (from 26 September 2006, notes 12 and 13) Mark Tucker (from 6 May 2005; notes 14 to 16) Mark Wood (until 17 October 2005) 473 530 502 320 491 575 133 840 477 1,412 1,515 412 368 95 913 46 113 632 479 60 29 59 107 44 1,174 1,943 1,938 455 1,000 1,751 1,878 83 95 27 562 550 1,000 1,751 1,905 91 196 155 1,345 1,174 150 1,324 87 86 89 33 1,119 347 126 210 2,089 1,130 865 8,253 127 399 1,257 865 8,652 Total executive directors 3,391 5,192 91 643 638 9,955 Non-executive directors Keki Dadiseth (from 1 April 2005; note 17) Michael Garrett Bridget Macaskill Roberto Mendoza Kathleen O’Donovan James Ross Rob Rowley (until 18 May 2006) Lord Turnbull (from 18 May 2006) 71 56 65 73 83 80 35 34 Total non-executive directors 497 71 56 65 73 83 80 35 34 497 37 50 50 135 60 60 90 482 37 50 50 135 60 60 90 482 Overall total 4,361 5,192 91 689 751 11,084 9,214 482 9,696 *Benefits include cash allowances for cars. **Pension supplements that are paid in cash are reported in this table for the first time. The policy on pensions is described in the section on pension arrangements on page 86. The pension arrangements for current executive directors are described in the section on directors’ pensions and life assurance on pages 94 and 95. Notes 1. In 2006, a deferred share award from his 2005 annual bonus valued at £209,090 was made to Philip Broadley. This is included in the 2005 total and further details are shown in the section on other share awards on page 93. 2. It is intended that a deferred share award from his 2006 annual bonus valued at £211,947 will be made to Philip Broadley. This is included in the 2006 bonus figure. 3. Clark Manning’s bonus figure excludes a contribution of £5,969 from a profit sharing plan, that has been made into a 401k retirement plan. This is included in the table on pension contributions on page 95. 4. It is intended that a deferred share award from his 2006 annual bonus valued at $121,360 will be made to Clark Manning. This is included in the 2006 bonus figure. 5. In 2006, a deferred share award from his 2005 annual bonus valued at £554,732 was made to Michael McLintock. This is included in the 2005 total and further details are shown in the section on other share awards on page 93. 6. It is intended that a deferred share award from his 2006 annual bonus valued at £555,000 will be made to Michael McLintock. This is included in the 2006 bonus figure. 7. In 2006, a deferred share award from his 2005 annual bonus valued at £119,790 was made to Mark Norbom. This is included in the 2005 total and further details are shown in the section on other share awards on page 93. 8. Mark Norbom’s directorship with Prudential plc ended on 14 December 2006 but he remained in employment until 31 January 2007. In connection with the termination of his employment he received a payment of £291,000 and will receive nine successive monthly payments of £55,792. He also continues to receive private medical and life cover, school fees and club memberships until 31 October 2007 and housing benefits until 5 May 2007, unless in each case he finds new employment which provides such benefits. 9. For 2006, Mark Norbom was also paid £90,603 in dividend equivalents from the awards detailed in the section on other share awards on page 93. This amount is included in the column headed Other payments. 10. Mark Norbom’s benefits include those that reflect his expatriate status, including costs of £153,071 related to housing. 11. It is intended that a deferred share award from his 2006 annual bonus valued at £80,673 will be made to Nick Prettejohn. This is included in the 2006 bonus figure. 12. Barry Stowe joined on 26 September 2006. As part of his appointment terms he was paid US$75,000, included in the 2006 bonus in the table above, as compensation for the loss of his 2006 bonus from his previous employer, The exchange rate used is US$1.8430 = £1. 13. Barry Stowe’s benefits include those that reflect his expatriate status, including costs of £43,403 related to housing. 14. In 2006, a deferred share award valued at £243,453 from his 2005 annual bonus was made to Mark Tucker. This is included in the 2005 total and further details are shown in the section on other share awards on page 93. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 89 Other report to shareholders Directors’ remuneration report Directors’ remuneration report continued For year ended 31 December 2006 Notes continued 15. It is intended that a deferred share award from his 2006 annual bonus valued at £492,744 will be made to Mark Tucker. This is included in the 2006 bonus figure. 16. Mark Tucker was eligible to be paid a housing allowance of £11,017 per month until 30 April 2006. This is included in the benefits figure. 17. Keki Dadiseth is paid an allowance of £10,478 per annum in respect of his accommodation expenses in London whilst on the Company’s business, in lieu of reimbursing hotel costs as is the usual practice for directors who are not resident in the UK. The Remuneration Committee reviewed each executive director’s individual contribution and the continuing strong operating performance of the Group in 2006 against the 2006 business plans and was satisfied the bonus payments made for the year were fully justified. Executive directors’ non-executive director earnings Executive directors who are released to serve as non-executive directors of other external companies retain the earnings resulting from such duties. In 2006, Michael McLintock earned £45,000 from an external company. Other directors served as non-executive directors on the boards of companies in the educational and cultural sectors without receiving a fee for those services. Directors’ outstanding long-term incentive awards The section below sets out the outstanding share awards under the Restricted Share Plan, the Group Performance Share Plan and the awards under additional long-term plans for the executive directors who run specific businesses. Share rights granted under the share-based long-term incentive plans Philip Broadley Clark Manning Plan name Restricted Share Plan Restricted Share Plan Restricted Share Plan Group Performance Share Plan Restricted Share Plan Restricted Share Plan Restricted Share Plan Group Performance Share Plan Business Unit Performance Plan (share element) Michael McLintock Restricted Share Plan Restricted Share Plan Restricted Share Plan Group Performance Share Plan Mark Norbom Restricted Share Plan Restricted Share Plan Group Performance Share Plan Business Unit Performance Plan (share element) Nick Prettejohn Group Performance Share Plan Business Unit Performance Plan (share element) Conditional share awards outstanding at 1 Jan 2006 (number of shares) Conditional awards in 2006 (number of shares) Year of initial award Market price of 2006 Releases or rights (options) granted award on upon vesting in 2006 (number of shares) date of of grant (pence) 2003 133,919 2004 210,713 2005 182,983 2006 170,127 591.5 527,615 170,127 2003 148,838 2004 196,174 2005 163,352 2006 241,415 591.5 Conditional share awards outstanding at 31 Dec 2006 (number of shares) –1 210,7132 182,9833 170,1274 563,823 –1 196,1742 163,3523 241,4154 Date of end of performance period 31 Dec 05 31 Dec 06 31 Dec 07 31 Dec 08 31 Dec 05 31 Dec 06 31 Dec 07 31 Dec 08 120,707 591.5 120,707 31 Dec 08 2006 2003 2004 2005 2006 508,364 362,122 45,620 67,429 58,555 64,199 591.5 171,604 64,199 2004 200,177 2005 182,983 2006 144,648 591.5 721,648 –1 67,4292 58,5553 64,1994 190,183 200,1772 182,9835 144,6486 31 Dec 05 31 Dec 06 31 Dec 07 31 Dec 08 31 Dec 06 31 Dec 07 31 Dec 08 2006 2006 2006 72,324 591.5 72,3246 31 Dec 08 383,160 216,972 600,132 149,964 591.5 149,9644 31 Dec 08 74,982 591.5 74,982 31 Dec 08 Mark Tucker Restricted Share Plan Group Performance Share Plan 2005 356,817 2006 337,044 591.5 356,817 337,044 224,946 224,946 356,8173 337,0444 693,861 31 Dec 07 31 Dec 08 90 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Other report to shareholders Directors’ remuneration report Cash rights granted under the Business Unit Performance Plan Plan name Clark Manning Business Unit Performance Plan (Cash element) Mark Norbom Business Unit Performance Plan (Cash element) Nick Prettejohn Business Unit Performance Plan (Cash element) Conditional awards outstanding at 1 Jan 2006 £000 Conditional awards in 2006 £000 Payments made in 2006 £000 Conditional awards outstanding at 31 Dec 2006 £000 Date of end of performance period – – – 577 361 374 577 31 Dec 08 3615 31 Dec 08 374 31 Dec 08 Year of initial award 2006 2006 2006 Restricted Share Plan awards For RSP awards prior to 2004, no rights were granted if the Company’s TSR performance as ranked against the comparator group was at the 60th percentile or below. For the 2004 and 2005 awards, no rights are granted if the Company’s TSR performance is below 50th percentile. For all awards, the maximum grant is made only if the TSR ranking of the Company is 20th percentile or above. Between these points, the size of the grant made is calculated on a straight-line sliding scale. In normal circumstances, directors may take up their right to receive shares at any time during the following seven years. 2006 Awards The awards made in respect of 2006 run to 31 December 2008. In determining the 2006 conditional share awards the shares were valued at their average share price during the preceding calendar year, and the price used to determine the number of shares was 498.45 pence. Group Performance Share Plan Awards under the Group Performance Share Plan are described on page 85. Business Unit Performance Plan Awards under the Business Unit Performance Plan are described on page 85. Notes 1. For the awards made in 2003 under the Restricted Share Plan, the Company’s TSR was ranked at 71st percentile at the end of the three-year performance period ending on 31 December 2005 and as a result the 2003 awards lapsed. 2. For the 2004 conditional RSP award the ranking of the Company’s TSR at the end of the three-year performance period ending on 31 December 2006 was 51st out of the remaining 89 companies in the FTSE (56th percentile) and as a result the awards lapsed. 3. For the awards under the 2005 Restricted Share Plan, as at 31 December 2006, Prudential’s TSR performance was ranked at 34th percentile compared to the FTSE 100 companies. 4. For the awards made in 2006 under the Group Performance Share Plan, as at 31 December 2006, Prudential’s TSR performance was at 106.7 per cent of the TSR performance of the index. 5. The 2005 RSP awards for Mark Norbom lapsed on the termination of his employment. 6. All awards granted to Mark Norbom under the 2006 LTIPs lapsed on the termination of his employment. 7. Mark Wood’s directorship ended effective 17 October 2005. Under his 2003 and 2004 conditional RSP awards, the ranking of the Company’s TSR in the month prior to his date of resignation of his directorship was below 50th percentile and as a result no release was made from these awards. 8. For the 2005 conditional RSP award to Mark Wood, the ranking of the Company’s TSR in the month prior to his date of resignation of his directorship was 27th and as a result 27.5 per cent of his award was released. This percentage takes into account pro-rating for his service during the three-year performance period. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 91 Other report to shareholders Directors’ remuneration report Directors’ remuneration report continued For year ended 31 December 2006 Business-specific long-term incentive plans Details of all outstanding awards under cash-based long-term incentive plans up to and including 2006 are set out in the table below. The performance period for all awards is three years. Clark Manning Business Cash LTIP Business Cash LTIP Business Cash LTIP Michael McLintock Phantom M&G options Phantom M&G options Phantom M&G options Phantom M&G options Phantom M&G shares Phantom M&G options Phantom M&G shares Phantom M&G options Phantom M&G shares Phantom M&G options Phantom M&G shares Mark Norbom Business Cash LTIP Business Cash LTIP Face value of conditional awards Year of initial award outstanding Conditionally awarded in 2006 £000 at 1 Jan 2006 £000 Payments made in 2006 £000 Face value of conditional awards outstanding at 31 Dec 2006 £000 Date of end of performance period 2003 2004 2005 2000 2001 2002 2003 2003 2004 2004 2005 2005 2006 2006 2004 2005 1,407 1,407 1,407 184 368 368 368 225 368 225 368 225 713 750 1,467 – 1,407 1,407 31 Dec 05 31 Dec 06 31 Dec 07 457 368 225 184 368 368 368 – 368 225 368 225 368 225 713 750 31 Dec 02 31 Dec 03 31 Dec 04 31 Dec 05 31 Dec 05 31 Dec 06 31 Dec 06 31 Dec 07 31 Dec 07 31 Dec 08 31 Dec 08 31 Dec 06 31 Dec 07 Total cash payments made in 2006 1,924 Clark Manning In 2003, 2004 and 2005, Clark Manning participated in a cash-based long-term plan that rewards the growth in appraisal value of Jackson. The award payout equals an initial award value adjusted by the Prudential plc share price change over the performance period. In order for any award to be made under the 2005 plan, the growth rate over the performance period must be eight per cent per annum compound or greater. At this level of performance, the initial award value is US$864,240. If the on-target performance level of 11.5 per cent per annum compound is achieved the initial award value is doubled. If the annual growth rate is at least 17.5 per cent, the payout increases to a maximum of three times the initial award value. For performance between these points, payouts are on a straight-line sliding scale. For the 2003 award, the results led to a payment of US$2,703,461. The face values of the awards for Clark Manning are converted at the average exchange rate for 2006 which was US$1.8430 = £1 (2005: US$1.8192 = £1). For the 2004 Business Cash LTIP, the compound annual growth rate in appraisal value was 21.64 per cent and as a result a payment of US$4,028,896 was made. Michael McLintock Michael McLintock’s 2003, 2004 and 2005 cash long-term incentive awards were under the M&G Chief Executive Long Term Incentive Plan that provides a cash reward through phantom M&G share awards and options. For these awards, the phantom share price at the beginning of the performance period was £1. The change in the phantom share price equals the change in M&G profit, modified up or down by the investment performance of M&G, over the performance period. For each year, the face value of the share award was £225,000 and the phantom option award had a face value of £367,800. Provided the phantom share options have value, they may be exercised in part or in full during annual exercise periods after three to seven years from the start of the performance period . For the 2003 award, the phantom share price at the end of the performance period was £2.03. This resulted in a payment from the phantom share award of £456,750 and a phantom option award of 367,800 units. Michael McLintock did not exercise any of these options. For the 2004 award, the phantom share price at the end of the performance period was £2.59. This resulted in a payment of £582,750 from the share element of the award. Mark Norbom Mark Norbom’s awards under the Business Cash LTIP for 2004 vested as a result of the Asia’s performance and a payment of £412,751 was made. On the termination of his employment his award under the 2005 Business Cash LTIP lapsed. Mark Wood Under the terms of the termination of his contract, payments were made to Mark Wood in 2006 from his 2003, 2004 and 2005 LTIP awards, taking into account performance and pro-rating for service during each respective performance period. The payments made to him were respectively £235,000, £180,556 and £103,056. 92 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Other report to shareholders Directors’ remuneration report Other share awards The table below sets out the share awards that have been made to executive directors under their appointment terms and those deferred from annual incentive plan payouts. The values of the deferred share awards are included in the bonus and total figures in the directors’ remuneration table on page 89. The number of shares is calculated using the average share price over the three business days commencing on the day of the announcement of the Group’s annual financial results for the relevant year. For the 2005 awards, the average share price was 671 pence. Conditional share awards outstanding at 1 Jan 2006 (number of shares) Year of initial grant Conditionally awarded in 2006 (number of shares) Scrip dividends accumulated (number of shares) Shares released in 2006 (number of shares) Conditional share awards outstanding at 31 Dec 2006 (number of shares) Date of end of restricted period Shares released in 2006 (number of shares) Market price at original date of award (pence) Market price at date of vesting or release (pence) Date of release Philip Broadley Deferred 2003 annual incentive award Deferred 2005 annual incentive award1 Michael McLintock Deferred 2003 annual incentive award Deferred 2004 annual incentive award Deferred 2005 annual incentive award1 Mark Norbom Awards under appointment terms2 Deferred 2004 annual incentive award Deferred 2005 annual incentive award1 Nick Prettejohn Awards under appointment terms3 Barry Stowe Awards under appointment terms4 Mark Tucker Deferred 2005 annual incentive award1 2004 6,229 158 6,387 31 Dec 06 2006 31,160 794 31,9541 31 Dec 08 2004 55,702 2005 91,420 1,419 2,330 57,121 31 Dec 06 93,750 31 Dec 07 2006 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 15,339 89,353 31,596 15,339 414,826 82,672 2,107 84,7791 31 Dec 08 15,339 – 89,3532 31,5962 15,3392 414,8262 01 Jan 06 15,339 16 Mar 06 01 Jan 07 01 Jan 08 01 Jan 09 20 Feb 13 439 627.5 2005 33,121 844 33,9652 31 Dec 07 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 17,852 454 18,3062 31 Dec 08 10,000 40,000 16,000 5,500 2,510 7,088 7,088 7,088 28,706 7,088 2,110 10,000 40,000 – – 16,000 5,500 31 Mar 06 10,000 31 Mar 06 31 Oct 06 40,000 15 Dec 06 31 Oct 07 31 Oct 08 627.5 627.5 667.5 710.5 2,510 27 Dec 06 702 705 2,510 – 7,088 7,088 7,088 28,706 7,088 2,110 21 Dec 06 01 May 07 01 May 08 01 May 09 01 Sept 09 01 Jan 10 01 May 10 36,282 924 – 37,2061 31 Dec 08 Notes 1. Under the annual bonus plans, the element of bonus for performance above target is made in the form of a share award deferred for three years. The value of the 2005 deferred share award is included in the total 2005 figure in the directors’ remuneration table on page 89. 2. Mark Norbom’s deferred shares under the 2004 Annual Incentive Plan (33,965 shares) and 2005 Annual Incentive Plan (18,306 shares) were released to him in February 2007. In addition, the 89,353 employer replacement shares which vested on 1 January 2007 were released and the Remuneration Committee exercised its discretion to allow a further 87,403 shares out of his awards under the appointment terms to vest, representing the proportion of the performance period which Mark Norbom had worked in respect of his pension replacement shares. Awards over 374,358 shares granted under the terms of Mark Norbom’s appointment lapsed. 3. In order to secure the appointment of Nick Prettejohn, he was awarded rights to Prudential plc shares that vest as set out in the table. In normal circumstances, releases are conditional on Nick Prettejohn being employed by Prudential at the date of vesting. If there is a change of control of Prudential he may be entitled to retain any unvested awards. 4. In order to secure the appointment of Barry Stowe, he was awarded rights to Prudential plc American Depositary Receipts, which vest as set out in the table. The figures in the table are the equivalent number of Prudential plc shares (one American Depositary Receipt equals two Prudential plc shares). In normal circumstances, releases are conditional on Barry Stowe being employed by Prudential at the date of vesting. If there is a change of control of Prudential he may be entitled to retain any unvested awards. 5. Mark Wood’s directorship ended with effect from 17 October 2005 and as part of the terms of the termination of his employment, 35,942 deferred shares under the 2004 annual incentive plan were released in 2006. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 93 Other report to shareholders Directors’ remuneration report Directors’ remuneration report continued For year ended 31 December 2006 Directors’ share options Options outstanding under the Savings-Related Share Option (SAYE) Scheme are set out below. The SAYE is open to all UK and certain overseas employees. Options under this scheme up to HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) limits are granted at a 20 per cent discount and cannot normally be exercised until a minimum of three years has elapsed. No payment has been made for the grant of any options. The price to be paid for exercise of these options is shown in the table below. No variations to any outstanding options have been made. Philip Broadley Michael McLintock Nick Prettejohn Mark Tucker Year of initial grant 2000 2003 2006 2005 Options outstanding at 1 Jan 2006 Exercised in 2006 Market price on exercise date (pence) Options forfeit in 2006 Options granted in 2006 Options outstanding at 31 Dec 2006 Market price at 31 Dec 2006 (pence) Original exercise price (pence) Exercise price adjusted for 2004 Rights Issue (pence) Earliest exercise date Latest exercise date 2,716 6,153 2,297 2,716 6,153 699.5 699.5 661 661 699.5 2,297 699.5 364 280 565 407 346 266 1 Jun 07 30 Nov 07 1 Jun 08 30 Nov 08 n/a 1 Jun 09 30 Nov 09 n/a 1 Dec 08 31 May 09 Notes 1. No gains were made by directors in 2006 on the exercise of share options (2005: nil). 2. No price was paid for the award of any option. 3. The highest and lowest share prices during 2006 were 743.5 pence and 538.5 pence respectively. Directors’ pensions and life assurance Philip Broadley participates in a non-contributory scheme that provides a pension of 1/60th of Final Pensionable Earnings for each year of service on retirement at age 60. Michael McLintock participates in a contributory scheme that provides a target pension of two-thirds of Final Pensionable Earnings on retirement at age 60 for an employee with 30 years or more potential service, for which his contribution is four per cent of basic salary. In both cases, Final Pensionable Earnings are capped by a notional scheme earnings cap which replicates the HMRC earnings cap in force before A-Day (6 April 2006). Philip Broadley and Michael McLintock are entitled to supplements based on the portion of their basic salary not covered for pension benefits under a HMRC approved scheme. These supplements are paid directly to them or, before A-Day, to a FURBS established in their name. They are provided with life assurance cover related to salary over the HMRC earnings cap. The cover is broadly equivalent to the death in service benefits provided under the relevant UK HMRC approved pension scheme. Nick Prettejohn is paid a salary supplement and he is a member of the staff defined contribution pension plan, which provides death in service benefits. The company contributions to the pension plan and his salary supplement are in total 25 per cent of his salary. Mark Tucker is paid a salary supplement of 25 per cent of his salary. He is also provided with life assurance cover of four times salary. Clark Manning participates in a US tax-qualified defined contribution plan (a 401k plan). He is also provided with life assurance cover of two times salary. Barry Stowe is paid a salary supplement of 25 per cent of his salary. He is also provided with life assurance cover of four times salary. Where supplements for pension purposes are paid in cash, the amounts are included in the table on directors’ remuneration on page 89. 94 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Other report to shareholders Directors’ remuneration report Details of directors’ pension entitlements under HMRC approved defined benefit schemes and supplements that are in the form of contributions to FURBS or other pension arrangements paid by the Company are set out in the following table. Additional pension earned during year ended 31 Dec 2006 Ignoring inflation on pension earned to 31 Dec 20051 £000 Allowing for inflation on pension earned to 31 Dec 20052 £000 – 2 – 3 – – – – – 2 – 3 – – – – Transfer value of accrued benefit at 31 Dec3 2006 B £000 – 111 – 397 – – – – 2005 A £000 – 82 – 336 – – – – Amount of (B – A) less contributions made by directors during 2006 £000 Contributions to FURBS or other pension and life assurance arrangements4 £000 – 29 – 49 – – – – 23 38 15 43 6 55 0 11 Sir David Clementi Philip Broadley Clark Manning Michael McLintock Mark Norbom Nick Prettejohn Barry Stowe Mark Tucker Age at 31 Dec 2006 Years of pensionable service at 31 Dec 2006 Accrued benefit at 31 Dec 2006 £000 57 45 48 45 48 46 49 49 – 6 – 14 – – – – – 12 – 34 – – – – Notes 1. As required by Stock Exchange Listing rules. 2. As required by the Companies Act remuneration regulations. 3. The transfer value equivalent has been calculated in accordance with Actuarial Guidance Note GN11. 4. As described under other supplementary arrangements. Supplements in the form of cash are included in the directors’ remuneration table on page 89. No enhancements to the retirement benefits paid to or receivable by directors or former directors other than the discretionary pension increases awarded to all pensioners have been made during the year. Total contributions to directors’ pension arrangements including cash supplements for pension purposes were £1,161,410 (2005: £1,111,602) of which £138,937 (2005: £361,145) related to money purchase schemes. Signed on behalf of the Board of directors Bridget Macaskill Chairman, Remuneration Committee 14 March 2007 Sir David Clementi Chairman 14 March 2007 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 95 Group financial statements Summary of statutory and supplementary IFRS and EEV basis results Summary of statutory and supplementary IFRS and EEV basis results Year ended 31 December 2006 The following tables show the results reported in the statutory financial statements on pages 99 to 249 and supplementary EEV basis results on pages 252 to 280. This page does not form part of the statutory financial statements. International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) basis results Statutory IFRS basis results Profit after tax attributable to equity holders of the Company Basic earnings per share Dividends per share declared and paid in reporting period Shareholders’ funds, excluding minority interests Supplementary IFRS basis information Operating profit from continuing operations based on longer-term investment returns Goodwill impairment charge Short-term fluctuations in investment returns Shareholders’ share of actuarial and other gains and losses on defined benefit pension schemes Profit before tax from continuing operations attributable to shareholders (including actual investment returns) Operating earnings per share from continuing operations after related tax and minority interests Dividends per share in respect of the reporting period (including interim dividend of 5.42p (2005: 5.30p) and final dividend of 11.72p (2005: 11.02p) declared after the end of the reporting period) Funds under management Supplementary European Embedded Value (EEV) basis results Operating profit from continuing operations based on longer-term investment returns Goodwill impairment charge Short-term fluctuations in investment returns Mark to market value movements on core borrowings Shareholders’ share of actuarial and other gains and losses on defined benefit pension schemes Effect of changes in economic assumptions and time value of cost of options and guarantees Profit before tax from continuing operations Operating earnings per share from continuing operations after related tax and minority interests Basic earnings per share Shareholders’ funds, excluding minority interests 2006 2005 £874m £748m 36.2p 31.6p 16.44p 15.95p £5.5bn £5.2bn 2006 £m 893 – 162 167 1,222 26.4p 2005 £m 957 (120) 211 (50) 998 32.2p 17.14p 16.32p £251bn £234bn 2006 £m 1,976 – 745 85 207 59 3,072 2005 £m 1,712 (120) 1,068 (67) (47) (302) 2,244 57.6p 91.7p 56.6p 66.9p £11.9bn £10.3bn Notes IFRS basis results The basis of preparation of statutory IFRS basis results and supplementary IFRS basis information is consistent with that applied for the 2005 results and financial statements. EEV basis results The EEV basis results are extracted from supplementary information and are not results that form part of the Group’s financial statements. Supplementary information The results shown above distinguish ‘operating profits’ based on longer-term investment returns from ‘profits before tax’. The reconciling items are presented in accordance with the Group’s policy as described in the Group’s financial statements and supplementary information. Items excluded from operating profit based on longer-term investment returns represent primarily the effects of altered investment market conditions (short-term fluctuations), actuarial gains and losses on defined benefit pension schemes, and exceptional items, including goodwill impairment. For EEV, the operating profit based on longer-term investment returns figure also excludes the mark to market value movements on core borrowings, the effect of changes in economic assumptions and the time value of the cost of options and guarantees. 96 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Group financial statements Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 97 Group financial statements Index to Group financial statements Index to Group financial statements Primary statements 99 Consolidated income statement 100 Statement of changes in equity 102 Consolidated balance sheet 104 Consolidated cash flow statement Notes on the Group financial statements Section A: Background and adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) 105 A1: Nature of operations 105 A2: Basis of preparation 105 A3: Critical accounting policies, estimates and judgements 111 A4: Significant accounting policies 121 A5: Adoption of IAS 32, IAS 39, and IFRS 4 at 1 January 2005 123 A6: New accounting pronouncements Section B: Summary of results 125 B1: Supplementary analysis of profit from continuing operations before tax attributable to shareholders 127 B2: Earnings per share 128 B3: Dividends 128 B4: New business 131 B5: Group balance sheet Section C: Group risk management 136 C: Group risk management Section D: Life assurance business 139 D1: Group overview 143 D2: UK insurance operations 153 D3: US operations 162 D4: Asian operations 168 D5: Capital position statement for life assurance businesses Section E: Banking operations 176 E1: Income statement for banking operations 177 E2: Balance sheet for banking operations 177 E3: Risk management overview 178 E4: Maturities of assets and liabilities and liquidity risk 179 E5: Losses on loans and advances 179 E6: Market risk 180 E7: Credit risk Section F: Income statement notes 181 F1: Segmental information 182 F2: Revenue 182 F3: Acquisition costs and other operating expenditure 183 F4: Finance costs: interest on core structural borrowings of shareholder-financed operations 183 F5: Tax 188 F6: Discontinued operations Section G: Financial assets and liabilities 189 G1: Financial instruments – designation and fair values 192 G2: Market risk 195 G3: Derivatives and hedging 198 G4: Derecognition, securitisation and collateral 198 G5: Impairment of financial assets 98 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Section H: Other information on balance sheet items 200 H1: Intangible assets attributable to shareholders 203 H2: Intangible assets attributable to the Prudential Assurance Company Limited (PAC) with-profits fund 204 H3: Reinsurers’ share of policyholder liabilities 205 H4: Tax assets and liabilities 205 H5: Accrued investment income and other debtors 206 H6: Property, plant and equipment 207 H7: Investment properties 208 H8: Investments in associates and joint ventures 210 H9: Assets and liabilities held for sale 210 H10: Cash and cash equivalents 210 H11: Shareholders’ equity: share capital, share premium and reserves 212 H12: Insurance contract liabilities and unallocated surplus of with-profits funds 212 H13: Borrowings 214 H14: Provisions and contingencies 218 H15: Other liabilities Section I: Other notes 219 I1: Staff and pension plans 227 I2: Share-based payments 234 I3: Key management remuneration 235 I4: Fees payable to auditor 235 I5: Related party transactions 236 I6: Subsidiary undertakings 238 I7: Commitments 239 I8: Post-balance sheet events – sale of Egg Banking plc 239 I9: Foreign exchange translation 239 I10: Cash flows 239 I11: 2005 balance sheet – reanalysis of assets and liabilities for acquired venture investment subsidiaries of the PAC with-profits sub-fund Parent company 240 Balance sheet of the parent company 241 Notes on the parent company financial statement 250 Statement of directors' responsibilities in respect of the Annual Report and the financial statements 251 Independent auditor's report to the members of Prudential plc European Embedded Value (EEV) basis supplementary information 252 Operating profit from continuing operations based on longer-term investment returns 253 Summarised consolidated income statement 253 Earnings per share 253 Dividends per share 254 Movement in shareholders’ capital and reserves (excluding minority interests) 255 Summarised consolidated balance sheet 256 Notes on the European Embedded Value (EEV) basis supplementary information 281 Statement of directors' responsibilities in respect of the European Embedded Value (EEV) basis supplementary information 281 Independent auditor's report to Prudential plc on the European Embedded Value (EEV) basis supplementary information Group financial statements Primary statement: Consolidated income statement Consolidated income statement Year ended 31 December 2006 Gross premiums earned Outward reinsurance premiums Earned premiums, net of reinsurance Investment income Other income Total revenue, net of reinsurance Benefits and claims and movement in unallocated surplus of with-profits funds Acquisition costs and other operating expenditure Finance costs: interest on core structural borrowings of shareholder-financed operations Goodwill impairment charge Total charges Profit before tax* Tax attributable to policyholders’ returns Profit before tax attributable to shareholders Tax expense Less: tax attributable to policyholders’ returns Tax attributable to shareholders’ profits Profit from continuing operations after tax Discontinued operations (net of tax) Profit for the year Attributable to: Equity holders of the Company Minority interests Profit for the year Earnings per share Basic (based on 2,413m and 2,365m shares respectively): Based on profit from continuing operations attributable to the equity holders of the Company Based on profit from discontinued operations attributable to the equity holders of the Company Diluted (based on 2,416m and 2,369m shares respectively): Based on profit from continuing operations attributable to the equity holders of the Company Based on profit from discontinued operations attributable to the equity holders of the Company Note 2006 £m 2005 £m 16,157 (171) 15,225 (197) F2 F2 F2 15,986 15,028 17,904 2,055 24,013 2,084 F1, F2 35,945 41,125 F3 F4 H1 F1 B1 F5 F5 F6 (28,421) (5,243) (210) – (33,100) (5,552) (208) (120) (33,874) (38,980) 2,071 (849) 1,222 (1,196) 849 2,145 (1,147) 998 (1,388) 1,147 (347) (241) 875 – 875 874 1 875 36.2p – 36.2p 36.2p – 36.2p 757 3 760 748 12 760 31.5p 0.1p 31.6p 31.5p 0.1p 31.6p *Profit before tax represents income net of post-tax transfers to unallocated surplus of with-profits funds, before tax attributable to policyholders and unallocated surplus of with-profits funds, unit-linked policies and shareholders’ profits. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 99 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Primary statement: Statement of changes in equity Statement of changes in equity Year ended 31 December 2006 Share capital £m Share premium £m Retained earnings £m Translation reserve £m Note 2006 Available- for-sale securities reserve £m Hedging Shareholders’ equity reserve £m £m Minority interests £m Total equity £m P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I Reserves Profit for the year Items recognised directly in equity: Exchange movements Movement on cash flow hedges Unrealised valuation movements on securities classified as available-for-sale: Unrealised holding losses arising during the year Less losses included in the income statement Related change in amortisation of deferred income and acquisition costs Related tax Total items of income and expense recognised directly in equity Total income and expense for the year Dividends Reserve movements in respect of share-based payments B3 Change in minority interests arising principally from purchase and sale of venture investment companies and property partnerships of the PAC with-profits fund and of other investments Acquisition of Egg minority interests I6 Share capital and share premium New share capital subscribed Transfer to retained earnings in respect of shares issued in lieu of cash dividends H11 H11 Treasury shares Movement in own shares in respect of share-based payment plans Movement in Prudential plc shares purchased by unit trusts consolidated under IFRS P a r e n t c o m p a n y 874 874 1 875 (224) (224) 7 7 (210) 7 (203) (74) 75 50 (298) (78) (298) (78) (2) 5 5 (210) 7 (203) 75 (26) (371) 503 (399) 15 874 (399) 15 (224) 7 (210) 7 (203) 75 (26) (371) 504 (399) 15 1 (167) (167) (84) (251) 43 43 3 333 336 336 (75) 75 6 0 6 0 6 0 E E V Net increase (decrease) in equity At beginning of year At end of year 3 119 122 258 1,564 1,822 404 3,236 3,640 (298) 173 (125) (78) 105 27 5 (3) 2 294 5,194 5,488 (40) 172 132 254 5,366 5,620 100 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Primary statement: Statement of changes in equity Share capital £m Share premium £m Retained earnings £m Translation reserve £m Note 2005 Available- for-sale securities reserve £m Reserves Profit for the year Items recognised directly in equity: Exchange movements Movement on cash flow hedges Unrealised valuation movements on securities classified as available-for-sale from 1 January 2005: Unrealised holding losses arising during the year Less losses included in the income statement Related change in amortisation of deferred income and acquisition costs Related tax Total items of income and expense recognised directly in equity Total income and expense for the year Cumulative effect of changes in accounting policies on adoption of IAS 32, IAS 39 and IFRS 4, net of applicable taxes at 1 January 2005 Dividends Reserve movements in respect of share-based payments Change in minority interests arising principally from purchase and sale of venture investment companies and property partnerships of the PAC with-profits fund A5 B3 Share capital and share premium New share capital subscribed Transfer to retained earnings in H11 respect of shares issued in lieu of cash dividends H11 Treasury shares Movement in own shares in respect of share-based payment plans Movement in Prudential plc shares purchased by unit trusts consolidated under IFRS Net increase (decrease) in equity At beginning of year A5 At end of year P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V 748 268 Hedging reserve £m Shareholders’ equity £m Minority interests £m Total equity £m 748 268 (4) 12 760 268 (3) 1 (4) (773) 22 (751) 307 152 65 333 (292) 748 333 (292) 1 (3) (3) 2 (173) (380) 15 397 0 55 (51) 51 0 3 (773) 22 (751) 307 218 38 786 226 (380) 15 55 0 3 1 13 (3) (1) 26 (773) 22 (751) 307 218 39 799 223 (380) 14 26 55 0 3 6 1,558 1,564 264 2,972 3,236 333 (160) 173 105 105 119 119 (3) (3) 705 4,489 5,194 35 137 172 740 4,626 5,366 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 101 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Primary statement: Consolidated balance sheet Consolidated balance sheet 31 December 2006 Assets Intangible assets attributable to shareholders: Goodwill Deferred acquisition costs and acquired in-force value of long-term business contracts Total Intangible assets attributable to PAC with-profits fund: In respect of acquired venture fund investment subsidiaries Deferred acquisition costs Total Total Other non-investment and non-cash assets: Property, plant and equipment Reinsurers’ share of policyholder liabilities Deferred tax assets Current tax recoverable Accrued investment income Other debtors Total Investments of long-term business, banking and other operations: Investment properties Investments accounted for using the equity method Financial investments: Loans and receivables Equity securities and portfolio holdings in unit trusts Debt securities Other investments Deposits Total Held for sale assets Cash and cash equivalents Total assets Note H1 (a) H1 (b) H2 (a) H2 (b) H6 H3 H4 H4 G1, H5 G1, H5 H7 H8 G1 2006 £m 2005 £m 1,341 2,497 3,838 830 31 861 1,341 2,405 3,746 679 35 714 4,699 4,460 1,133 945 1,012 404 1,900 1,052 6,446 910 1,278 755 231 1,791 1,305 6,270 14,491 6 13,180 5 11,573 78,892 81,719 5,401 7,759 13,245 71,985 82,471 3,879 7,627 199,841 192,392 H9 H10 463 5,071 728 3,586 B5 216,520 207,436 102 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Primary statement: Consolidated balance sheet Equity and liabilities Equity Shareholders’ equity Minority interests Total equity Liabilities Banking customer accounts Policyholder liabilities and unallocated surplus of with-profits funds: Insurance contract liabilities Investment contract liabilities with discretionary participation features Investment contract liabilities without discretionary participation features Unallocated surplus of with-profits funds Total Core structural borrowings of shareholder-financed operations: Subordinated debt (other than Egg) Other Egg subordinated debt Total Other borrowings: Operational borrowings attributable to shareholder-financed operations Borrowings attributable to with-profits funds Other non-insurance liabilities: Obligations under funding, securities lending and sale and repurchase agreements Net asset value attributable to unit holders of consolidated unit trusts and similar funds Current tax liabilities Deferred tax liabilities Accruals and deferred income Other creditors Provisions Other liabilities Held for sale liabilities Total Total liabilities Total equity and liabilities Note H11 2006 £m 2005 £m 5,488 132 5,620 5,194 172 5,366 G1 5,554 5,830 H12 123,213 120,436 26,523 G1 12,026 11,330 28,733 13,042 13,599 H12 G1 178,587 170,315 H13 H13 H13 G1, H13 G1, H13 G1, H13 G1 G1 H4 H4 G1 G1 H14 G1, H15 H9 1,538 1,074 2,612 451 3,063 5,609 1,776 4,232 2,476 1,303 3,882 517 1,398 464 1,652 387 1,646 1,093 2,739 451 3,190 6,432 1,898 4,529 965 962 3,077 506 1,478 972 1,770 146 16,311 14,405 B5 210,900 202,070 216,520 207,436 The consolidated financial statements on pages 99 to 239 were approved by the Board of directors on 14 March 2007. Sir David Clementi Chairman Mark Tucker Group Chief Executive Philip Broadley Group Finance Director Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 103 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Primary statement: Consolidated cash flow statement Consolidated cash flow statement Year ended 31 December 2006 Cash flows from operating activities Profit before tax* Changes in operating assets and liabilities: Investments Banking customer accounts Other non-investment and non-cash assets Policyholder liabilities (including unallocated surplus) Other liabilities (including operational borrowings) Interest income and expense and dividend income included in profit before tax Other non-cash items Operating cash items: Interest receipts Dividend receipts Tax paid Net cash flows from operating activities Cash flows from investing activities Purchases of property, plant and equipment Proceeds from disposal of property, plant and equipment Costs incurred on purchase of Egg minority interests Acquisition of subsidiaries, net of cash balances Disposal of subsidiaries, net of cash balances Net cash flows from investing activities Cash flows from financing activities Structural borrowings of the Group: Shareholder-financed operations: Issue Redemption Interest paid With-profits operations: Interest paid Equity capital: Issues of ordinary share capital Dividends paid Net cash flows from financing activities Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents at end of year Note 2006 £m 2005 £m 2,071 2,145 (13,748) (276) (232) 13,540 1,136 (10,056) 198 (21,462) (861) (957) 21,113 180 (8,410) 0 6,466 3,633 (523) 2,209 (174) 34 (6) (70) 114 (102) 5,946 2,680 (573) (199) (160) 6 – (68) 252 30 – (1) (204) 168 (308) (204) (9) (9) 15 (323) (522) 1,585 3,586 (100) 3 (328) (678) (847) 4,341 92 3,586 H6 I6 I6 I6 I10 H11 B3 H10 5,071 *Profit before tax represents income net of post-tax transfers to unallocated surplus of with-profits funds, before tax attributable to policyholders and unallocated surplus of with- profits funds, unit-linked policies and shareholders’ profits. It does not represent profit before tax attributable to shareholders. 104 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements A: Background and adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) A1: Nature of operations Prudential plc (the Company) together with its subsidiaries (collectively, the Group or Prudential) is an international financial services group with its principal operations in the UK, the US and Asia. The Group operates in the UK through its subsidiaries, primarily The Prudential Assurance Company Limited (PAC), Prudential Annuities Limited (PAL), Prudential Retirement Income Limited (PRIL), M&G Group Limited and Egg plc. On 29 January 2007 the Company announced that it had entered into a binding agreement to sell its Egg banking business to Citi, as described in note I8. In the US, the Group’s principal subsidiary is Jackson National Life Insurance Company (Jackson). The Group also has operations in Hong Kong, Malaysia, Singapore, Taiwan and other Asian countries. Prudential offers a wide range of retail financial products and services and fund management services throughout these territories. The retail financial products and services principally include life insurance, pensions and annuities as well as collective investments and deposit and mortgage banking services. Long-term business products written in the UK and Asia are principally with-profits deposit administration, other conventional and unitised with-profits policies and non-participating pension annuities in the course of payment. Long-term business also includes linked business written in the UK and Asia. The principal products written by Jackson are interest-sensitive deferred annuities and whole-life policies, variable annuities, guaranteed investment contracts, fixed index deferred annuities and term life insurance. Prudential plc is a public limited company incorporated and registered in England and Wales. The registered office is: Laurence Pountney Hill London EC4R 0HH Registered number: 1397169 A2: Basis of preparation The consolidated financial statements consolidate the Group and the Group’s interest in associates and jointly-controlled entities. The parent company financial statements present information about the Company as a separate entity and not about the Group. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared and approved by the directors in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as adopted by the European Union (EU). The Company has elected to prepare its parent company financial statements in accordance with UK Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). These are presented on pages 240 to 249. In 2005, the Group early adopted the amendment to IAS 39, ‘The Fair Value Option’ and IAS 19, ‘Employee Benefits’ (as amended in 2004). The Group has applied all IFRS standards and interpretations adopted by the EU and effective at 31 December 2006. A3: Critical accounting policies, estimates and judgements (a) Critical accounting policies Prudential’s discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of operations are based upon Prudential’s consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with IFRS adopted for use in the EU. Were the Group to apply IFRS as published by the International Accounting Standards Board, as opposed to EU-adopted IFRS, no additional adjustments would be required. The preparation of these financial statements requires Prudential to make estimates and judgements that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, and revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, Prudential evaluates its estimates, including those related to long-term business provisioning, the fair value of assets and the declaration of bonus rates. Prudential bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgements about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Critical accounting policies are defined as those that are reflective of significant judgements and uncertainties, and potentially give rise to different results under different assumptions and conditions. Prudential believes that its critical accounting policies are limited to those described below. The critical accounting policies in respect of the items discussed below are critical for the Group’s results insofar as they relate to the Group’s shareholder-financed business, in particular for Jackson. The policies are not critical in respect of the Group’s with-profits business. Accordingly, explanation is provided in this note and cross-referenced notes as to why the distinction between with-profits business and shareholder-backed business is relevant. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 105 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued A3: Critical accounting policies, estimates and judgements continued The items discussed below and in cross-referenced notes explain the effect of changes in estimates and the effect of reasonably likely changes in the key assumptions underlying these estimates as of the latest balance sheet date so as to provide analysis that recognises the different accounting effects on profit and loss or equity. In order to provide relevant analysis that is appropriate to the circumstances applicable to the Group’s businesses, the explanations refer to types of business, fund structure, the relationship between asset and policyholder liability measurement, and the differences in the method of accounting permitted under IFRS 4 for accounting for insurance contract assets, policyholder liabilities and unallocated surplus of the Group’s with-profits funds. Insurance contract accounting With the exception of contracts described in note D1, the Group’s life assurance contracts are classified as insurance contracts and investment contracts with discretionary participating features. As permitted by IFRS 4, assets and liabilities of these contracts (see below) are accounted for under previously applied GAAP. Accordingly, except as described below, the modified statutory basis (MSB) of reporting as set out in the revised Statement of Recommended Practice (SORP) issued by the Association of British Insurers (ABI) in November 2003 has been applied for the 2006 and 2005 results. From 1 January 2005, the Group has chosen to improve its accounting for UK regulated with-profits funds by the voluntary application of the UK accounting standard FRS 27, ‘Life Assurance’. Under this standard, the main accounting changes that were required for UK with-profits funds were: • derecognition of deferred acquisition costs and related deferred tax; and • replacement of MSB liabilities with adjusted realistic basis liabilities. The primary effect of these changes was to fundamentally alter the basis of accounting and carrying value of deferred acquisition costs (as set out in note H2) and the reported level of unallocated surplus of with-profits funds (as set out in note H12) from 1 January 2005. Under UK GAAP, the fund for future appropriations (FFA) represented the excess of assets over policyholder liabilities for the Group’s with-profits funds. Under IFRS the FFA is termed unallocated surplus and the Group has opted to account for it wholly as a liability with no allocation to equity. This treatment reflects the fact that shareholders’ participation in the cost of bonuses arises only on distribution. As a consequence of this accounting treatment, shareholder profits on with-profits business continue to reflect the one-ninth cost of declared bonus previously applied under UK GAAP. For Jackson, applying the MSB as applicable to overseas operations, the assets and liabilities of insurance contracts are accounted for under insurance accounting prescribed by US GAAP. For Asian operations the local GAAP is applied with adjustments, where necessary, to comply with UK GAAP. For Asian operations in countries where local GAAP is not well established and in which the business written is primarily non-participating business, US GAAP is used as the most appropriate proxy to local GAAP. The usage of these bases of accounting has varying effects on the way in which product options and guarantees are measured. For UK regulated with-profits funds, for the 2006 and 2005 results, options and guarantees are valued on a market consistent basis. The basis is described in note D2(d)(ii). For other operations a market consistent basis is not applied under the accounting basis described in note A4. Details of the guarantees, basis of setting assumptions, and sensitivity to altered assumptions are described in notes D3 and D4. Valuation and accounting presentation of fair value movements of derivatives and debt securities of Jackson Under IAS 39, derivatives are required to be carried at fair value. Unless hedge accounting is applied, value movements on derivatives are recognised in the income statement. For derivative instruments of Jackson, the Group has considered at length whether it is appropriate to undertake the necessary operational changes to qualify for hedge accounting so as to achieve matching of value movements in hedging instruments and hedged items in the performance statements. In reaching the decision a number of factors were particularly relevant. These were: • IAS 39 hedging criteria has been designed primarily in the context of hedging and hedging instruments that are assessable as financial instruments that are either stand-alone or separable from host contracts, rather than, for example, duration characteristics of insurance contracts; • the high hurdle levels under IAS 39 of ensuring hedge effectiveness at the level of individual hedge transactions for specific transactions; • the difficulties in applying the macro hedge provisions under IAS 39 (which are more suited to banking arrangements) to Jackson’s derivative book; • the complexity of asset and liability matching of US life insurers such as those with Jackson’s product range; and finally • whether it is possible or desirable, without an unacceptable level of costs and restraint on commercial activity, to achieve the accounting hedge effectiveness required under IAS 39. 106 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements A3: Critical accounting policies, estimates and judgements continued In this regard, the issues surrounding the IAS 39 application are very similar to those considered by other US life insurers when the US financial reporting standard FAS 133 was first applied for US GAAP reporting. Taking account of these considerations the Group has decided that, except for certain minor categories of derivatives, it is not appropriate to seek to achieve hedge accounting under IAS 39 by completely reconfiguring the structure of Jackson’s derivative book. As a result of this decision the total income statement results are more volatile as the movements in the value of Jackson’s derivatives are reflected within it. Under IAS 39, unless carried at amortised cost (subject to impairment provisions where appropriate) under the held-to-maturity category, debt securities are also carried at fair value. The Group has chosen not to classify any financial assets as held-to-maturity. Debt securities of Jackson are designated as available-for-sale with value movements being recorded as movements within shareholders’ equity. Presentation of results before tax The total tax charge for the Group reflects tax that in addition to relating to shareholders’ profits is also attributable to policyholders and unallocated surplus of with-profits funds and unit-linked policies. This is explained in more detail in note F5. However, pre-tax profits are determined after transfers to or from unallocated surplus of with-profits funds. These transfers are in turn determined after taking account of tax borne by with-profits funds. Consequently reported profit before the total tax charge is not representative of pre-tax profits attributable to shareholders. In order to provide a measure of pre-tax profits attributable to shareholders the Group has chosen to adopt an income statement presentation of the tax charge and pre-tax results that delineates between policyholder and shareholder components. Supplementary analysis of results and earnings attributable to shareholders With the exception of debt securities held by Jackson and Egg and assets classified as loans and receivables, all financial investments are designated as fair value through profit and loss. Short-term fluctuations in investment returns on such assets held by with-profits funds, and those of investment property for the accounting treatment is similarly based, do not affect reported shareholder results. This is because (i) unallocated surplus of with-profits funds are accounted for as liabilities and (ii) excess or deficits of income and expenditure of the funds over the required surplus for distribution are transferred to or from unallocated surplus. However, for shareholder-backed businesses the short-term fluctuations affect the result for the year and the Group provides additional analysis of results to provide information on results before and after short-term fluctuations in investment returns. Previously under UK GAAP (i.e. prior to 2005), the Group used operating profit based on longer-term investment returns before amortisation of goodwill as a supplemental measure of its results. For the purposes of measuring operating profit, investment returns on shareholder-financed business were based on the expected longer-term rates of return. For debt securities, the longer-term returns (including losses arising on the recognition of permanent diminutions in value) were averaged over five years for inclusion in operating profit. Under IFRS, the Group continues to use operating profit based on longer-term investment returns as a supplemental measure of its results, although the basis of calculation has been improved, as disclosed in note A4(d). (b) Critical accounting estimates and judgements Investments Determining the fair value of unquoted investments The Group holds financial investments which are not quoted on active markets. Their fair values are determined in full or in part by using valuation techniques. If the market for a financial investment of the Group is not active, the Group establishes fair value by using quotations from independent third parties, such as brokers or by using valuation techniques. The fair values of investments valued using a valuation technique at 31 December 2006 was £4,548 million (31 December 2005: £4,947 million). The valuation techniques include the use of recent arm’s length transactions, reference to other instruments that are substantially the same, discounted cash flow analysis, option adjusted spread models and enterprise valuation and may include a number of assumptions relating to variables such as credit risk and interest rates. Changes in assumptions relating to these variables could positively or negatively impact the reported fair value of these instruments. Additional details are explained in note G1. Determining impairments relating to financial assets Available-for-sale securities Financial investments carried on an available-for-sale basis are represented by Jackson’s and Egg’s debt securities portfolio. These are considered to be impaired if there has been a significant or prolonged period of decline in fair value below its amortised cost or if there is objective evidence of impairment. The consideration of this requires management’s judgement. Among the factors considered is whether the decline in fair value results from a change in quality of the security itself, or from a downward movement in the market as a whole and the likelihood of recovering the carrying value based on the current and short-term prospects of the issuer. Unrealised losses that are considered to be primarily the result of market conditions, such as increasing interest rates, unusual market volatility, or industry-related events, and where the Group also believes there is a reasonable expectation for recovery and, furthermore, it has the intent and ability to hold the investment until maturity or the market recovers, are usually determined to be temporary. Prudential’s review of fair value involves several criteria, including economic conditions, credit loss experience, other issuer-specific developments and future cash flows. These assessments are based on the best available information at the time. Factors such as market liquidity, the widening of bid/ask spreads and a change in cash flow assumptions can contribute to future price volatility. If actual experience differs negatively from the assumptions and other considerations used in the consolidated financial statements, unrealised losses currently in equity may be recognised in the income statement in future periods. Additional details are described in note G5. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 107 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued A3: Critical accounting policies, estimates and judgements continued Assets held at amortised cost Loans and receivables are carried at amortised cost using the effective interest rate method. The loans and receivables include loans collateralised by mortgages, deposits and loans to policyholders. For these assets, the Group measures the amount of any impairment loss by comparing the carrying amount of the asset with the present value of its estimated future cash flows. In estimating future cash flows, the Group looks at the expected cash flows of the assets and applies historical loss experience of assets with similar credit risks that has been adjusted for conditions in the historical loss experience which no longer exist or for conditions that are expected to arise. The estimated future cash flows are discounted using the financial asset’s original or variable effective interest rate and exclude credit losses that have not yet been incurred. The risks inherent in reviewing the impairment of any investment include the risk that market results may differ from expectations; facts and circumstances may change in the future and differ from estimates and assumptions; or the Group may later decide to sell the security as a result of changed circumstances. The principal holdings of loans and receivables where credit risk is of particular significance are loans and advances to customers held by Egg. Egg has significant concentrations of credit risk in respect of its unsecured lending on credit cards, personal loans and mortgage lending secured on property in the UK. The table in note E5 details the movements in the allowance for losses on such loans and advances. Changes in the estimates of credit risk in any reporting period could result in a change in the allowance for losses on the loans and advances. Insurance contracts Product classification IFRS 4 requires contracts written by insurers to be classified as either ‘insurance contracts’ or ‘investment contracts’ depending on the level of insurance risk transferred. If significant insurance risk is transferred by the contract then it is classified as an insurance contract. Contracts that transfer financial risk but not significant insurance risk are termed investment contracts. Furthermore, some contracts, both insurance and investment, contain discretionary participation features representing the contractual right to receive additional benefits as a supplement to guaranteed benefits: (a) that are likely to be a significant portion of the total contract benefits; (b) whose amount or timing is contractually at the discretion of the insurer; and (c) that are contractually based on asset or fund performance, as discussed in IFRS 4. Accordingly, insurers must perform a product classification exercise across their portfolio of contracts issued to determine the allocation to these various categories. IFRS 4 permits the continued usage of previously applied GAAP for insurance contracts and investment contracts with discretionary participating features. Except for UK regulated with-profits funds, as described subsequently, this basis has been applied by the Group. For investment contracts that do not contain discretionary participating features, IAS 39 and, where the contract includes an investment management element, IAS 18, apply measurement principles to assets and liabilities attaching to the contract that may diverge from those previously applied. The principal lines of business for which measurement changes arose on adoption of IFRS are certain unit-linked savings and similar contracts in the UK. Further details of this exercise are given in note D1. Valuation assumptions (i) Contracts of with-profits funds The Group’s insurance contracts and investment contracts with discretionary participating features are primarily with-profits and other protection type policies. For UK regulated with-profits funds, the contract liabilities are valued by reference to the UK Financial Services Authority’s (FSA) realistic basis. In aggregate, this basis has the effect of placing a value on the liabilities of UK with-profits contracts, which reflects the amounts expected to be paid based on the current value of investments held by the with-profits funds and current circumstances. The basis of determining liabilities for the Group’s with-profits business has little or no effect on the results attributable to shareholders. This is because movements on liabilities of the with-profits funds are absorbed by the unallocated surplus. The unallocated surplus represents the excess of assets over liabilities that have yet to be appropriated between policyholders and shareholders. Except through indirect effects, or in remote circumstances as described below, changes to liability assumptions are therefore reflected in the carrying value of the unallocated surplus rather than shareholders’ equity. A detailed explanation of the basis of liability measurement is contained in note D2(d)(ii). 108 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements A3: Critical accounting policies, estimates and judgements continued The Group’s other with-profits contracts are written in with-profits funds that operate in some of the Group’s Asian operations. The liabilities for these contracts and those of Prudential Annuities Limited, which is a subsidiary company of the PAC with-profits funds, are determined differently. For these contracts the liabilities are estimated using actuarial methods based on assumptions relating to premiums, interest rates, investment returns, expenses, mortality and surrenders. The assumptions to which the estimation of these reserves is particularly sensitive are the interest rate used to discount the provision and the assumed future mortality experience of policyholders. For liabilities determined using the basis described above for UK regulated with-profits funds, and the other liabilities described in the preceding paragraph, changes in estimates arising from the likely range of possible changes in underlying key assumptions have no direct impact on the reported profit. This lack of sensitivity reflects the with-profits fund structure, basis of distribution, and the application of previous GAAP to the unallocated surplus of with-profits funds as permitted by IFRS 4. Changes in liabilities of these contracts that are caused by altered estimates are absorbed by the unallocated surplus of the with-profits funds. As noted previously, the unallocated surplus is accounted for as a liability and thus, except in the remote circumstances where support for the funds by shareholders’ funds was required, changes in its level do not directly affect shareholders’ equity. The Company’s obligations and more detail on such circumstances are described in note H14. (ii) Other contracts Contracts, other than those of with-profits funds, are written in shareholder-backed operations of the Group. The significant shareholder- backed product groupings and the factors that may significantly affect IFRS results due to experience against assumptions or changes of assumptions vary significantly between business units. For some types of business the effect of changes in assumptions may be significant, whilst for others, due to the nature of the product, assumption setting may be of less significance. The nature of the products and the significance of assumptions are discussed in notes D2, D3 and D4. From the perspective of shareholder results the key sensitivity relates to assumed future investment returns for the Taiwan life operation as described in note D4. Jackson Jackson offers individual fixed annuities, fixed index annuities, immediate annuities, variable annuities, individual and variable life insurance and institutional products. With the exception of institutional products and an incidental amount of business for annuity certain contracts, which are accounted for as investment contracts under IAS 39, all of Jackson life assurance contracts are accounted for under IFRS 4 as insurance contracts by applying US GAAP, the previous GAAP used before IFRS adoption. Under US GAAP the requirements of SFAS 60 ‘Accounting and Reporting for Insurance Enterprises’ and SFAS 97 ‘Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises for certain Long-Duration Contracts and for Realized Gains and Losses from the Sale of Investments’ apply to these contracts. The accounting requirements under these standards and the effect of changes in valuation assumptions are considered below for fixed annuity, variable annuity and traditional life insurance contracts. Fixed annuity contracts, which are investment contracts under US GAAP terminology, are accounted for by applying in the first instance a retrospective deposit method to determine the liability for policyholder benefits. This is then augmented by potentially three additional amounts, namely deferred income, any amounts previously assessed against policyholders that are refundable on termination of the contract, and any premium deficiency, i.e., any probable future loss on the contract. These types of contract contain considerable interest rate guarantee features. Notwithstanding the accompanying market risk exposure, except in the circumstances of interest rate scenarios where the guarantee rates included in contract terms are higher than crediting rates that can be supported from assets held to cover liabilities, the accounting measurement of Jackson’s fixed annuity products is not generally sensitive to interest rate risk. This position derives from the nature of the products and the US GAAP basis of measurement. Variable annuity contracts written by Jackson may provide for guaranteed minimum death, income, or withdrawal features. In general terms, liabilities for these benefits are accounted for under US GAAP by using estimates of future benefits and fees under best estimate assumptions. For variable annuity business the key assumption is the expected long-term level of equity market returns which for 2006 and 2005 was 8.4 per cent per annum determined using a mean reversion methodology. Likely changes to this percentage return are not expected to be significant. These returns affect the level of future expected profits through their effects on the fee income with consequential impact on the amortisation of deferred acquisition costs as described below and the required level of provision for guaranteed minimum death benefit claims. For traditional life insurance contracts, provisions for future policy benefits are determined under SFAS 60 using the net level premium method and assumptions as of the issue date as to mortality, interest, policy lapses and expenses plus provisions for adverse deviation. Except to the extent of mortality experience, which primarily affects profits through variations in claim payments and the guaranteed minimum death benefit reserves, the profits of Jackson are relatively insensitive to changes in insurance risk. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 109 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued A3: Critical accounting policies, estimates and judgements continued Asian operations The insurance products written in the Group’s Asian operations principally cover with-profits business, unit-linked business, and other non-participating business. The results of with-profits business are relatively insensitive to changes in estimates and assumptions that affect the measurement of policyholder liabilities. As for the UK business, this feature arises because unallocated surplus is accounted for by the Group as a liability. The results of Asian unit-linked business are also relatively insensitive to changes in estimates or assumptions. The principal non-participating business in the Group’s Asian operations, for which changes in estimates and assumptions are important from year to year, is the traditional whole-life business written in Taiwan. The premiums for the in-force business for these contracts have been set by the regulator at different points for the industry as a whole. Premium rates were set to give a guaranteed minimum sum assured on death and a guaranteed surrender value on early surrender based on prevailing interest rates at the time of policy issue. Premium rates also included an allowance for mortality and expenses. The required rates of guarantee have fallen over time as interest rates have reduced from a high of eight per cent to current levels of around two per cent. The current low bond rates in Taiwan gives rise to a negative spread against the majority of these policies. The current cash costs of funding in force negative spread in Taiwan is around £40 million a year. The profits attaching to these contracts are particularly affected by the rates of return earned, and estimated to be earned on, the assets held to cover liabilities and on future investment income and contract cash flows. Under IFRS, the insurance contract liabilities of the Taiwan business are determined on the US GAAP basis as applied previously under UK GAAP. Under this basis the policy liabilities are calculated on sets of assumptions, which are locked-in at the point of policy inception, and a deferred acquisition cost is held in the balance sheet. The adequacy of the insurance contract liabilities is tested by reference to best estimates of expected investment returns on policy cash flows and reinvested income. The assumed earned rates are used to discount the future cash flows. The assumed earned rates consist of a long-term best estimate determined by consideration of long-term market conditions, and rates assumed to be earned in the trending in period. For 2005, it was projected that rates of return for Taiwanese bond yields would trend from the then current levels of some two per cent to 5.5 per cent by 31 December 2012. For 2006, it has been assumed that the longer-term bond rate will be attained one year later, i.e. by 31 December 2013. The liability adequacy test results are sensitive to the attainment of the trended rates during the trending period. Based on the current asset mix, margins in other contracts that are used in the assessment of the liability adequacy tests, and currently assumed future rates of return, if interest rates were to remain at current levels in 2007, and the target date for attainment of the long-term bond yield deferred to 31 December 2014, the premium reserve, net of deferred acquisition costs, would be broadly sufficient. If interest rates were to remain at current levels in 2008 with a further one year delay in the progression period, then some level of write-off of deferred acquisition costs may be necessary. However, the amount of the charge based on current in-force business which is estimated at £70-90 million, is sensitive for the previously mentioned variables. Furthermore, the actual amount of any write-off would be affected by the impact of new business written between 31 December 2006 and the future reporting dates to the extent that the business is taken into account as part of the liability adequacy testing calculations for the portfolio of contracts. The adequacy of the liability is also sensitive to the level of the projected long-term rate. The current long-term assumption of 5.5 per cent has been determined on a prudent best estimate basis by reference to detailed assessments of the financial dynamics of the Taiwanese economy. In the event that the rate applied was altered, the carrying value of the deferred acquisition costs and policyholder liabilities would potentially be affected. Details of this sensitivity are shown in note D4(h)(ii). Deferred acquisition costs Significant costs are incurred in connection with acquiring new insurance business. Except for acquisition costs of with-profits contracts of the UK regulated with-profits funds, which are accounted for under the realistic FSA regime as described in note A4, these costs, which vary with, and are primarily related to, the production of new business, are capitalised and amortised against margins in future revenues on the related insurance policies. The recoverability of the asset is measured and the asset is deemed impaired if the projected future margins are less than the carrying value of the asset. To the extent that the future margins differ from those anticipated, then an adjustment to the carrying value of the deferred acquisition cost asset will be necessary. The deferral and amortisation of acquisition costs is of most relevance to the Group’s results for shareholder-financed long-term business of Jackson and Asian operations. The majority of the UK shareholder-backed operations is for individual and group annuity business where the incidence of acquisition costs is negligible. 110 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements A3: Critical accounting policies, estimates and judgements continued Jackson National Life Insurance Company (Jackson) For term business, acquisition costs are deferred and amortised in line with expected premiums. For annuity business, acquisition costs are deferred and amortised in line with expected gross profits on the relevant contracts. For interest-sensitive business, the key assumption is the long-term spread between the earned rate and the rate credited to policyholders, which is based on the annual spread analysis. In addition, expected gross profits depend on mortality assumptions, assumed unit costs and terminations other than deaths (including the related charges), all of which are based on a combination of actual experience of the Jackson companies, industry experience and future expectations. A detailed analysis of actual experience is measured by the internally developed mortality studies. For variable annuity business, as described above, the key assumption is the expected long-term level of equity market returns, which for 2006 and 2005 was 8.4 per cent per annum determined using a mean reversion methodology. Asian operations The key shareholder-backed Asian operation is the Taiwan life business. The sensitivity of the results for this operation, including the potential effect on write-offs of deferred acquisition costs, is significant and is described above. Pensions The Group applies the requirements of IAS 19, ‘Employee benefits’, to its defined benefit pension schemes. Due to the inclusion of actuarial gains and losses in the income statement rather than being recognised directly in equity, the results of the Group are affected by changes in interest rates for corporate bonds that affect the rate applied to discount projected pension payments and changes in mortality assumptions. The economic participation in the surplus or deficits attaching to the main Prudential Staff Pension Scheme (PSPS) and the smaller Scottish Amicable Pensions Scheme (SAPS) are shared between the PAC with-profits sub-fund (WPSF) and shareholder operations. The economic interest reflects the source of contributions over the scheme life, which in turn reflects the activity of the members during their employment. In the case of PSPS, at 31 December 2004, the attribution between the WPSF and shareholders’ funds was in the ratio 80/20. In 2005, following extensive analysis, this ratio was revised to 70/30 at 31 December 2005. Movements in the apportionment of the surplus or deficit for PSPS between the WPSF and shareholders’ funds in 2006 reflects the 70/30 ratio application to movements in the carrying value of assets and liabilities as at 31 December 2005 but with service cost and contributions for ongoing service apportioned by reference to the cost allocation for activity of current employees. For SAPS the ratio for both 2006 and 2005 is estimated to be 50/50 between the WPSF and shareholders’ funds. Deferred tax Deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that they are regarded as recoverable, that is to the extent that, on the basis of all the available evidence, it can be regarded as more likely than not that there will be suitable taxable profits against which the losses can be relieved. The UK taxation regime applies separate rules to trading and capital profits and losses. The distinction between temporary differences that arise from items of either a capital or trading nature may affect the recognition of deferred tax assets. The judgements made, and uncertainties considered, in arriving at deferred tax balances in the financial statements are discussed in note H4. Goodwill Goodwill impairment testing requires the exercise of judgement by management as to prospective future cash flows. A4: Significant accounting policies (a) Financial instruments (other than long-term business contracts classified as financial instruments under IFRS 4) Investment classification Upon initial recognition, financial investments are measured at fair value. Subsequently, the Group is permitted under IAS 39, subject to specific criteria, to designate its investments as either financial investments at fair value through profit and loss, financial investments held on an available-for-sale basis, financial investments held-to-maturity or loans and receivables. The Group holds financial investments on the following bases: (i) Financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit and loss – this comprises assets and liabilities designated by management as fair value through profit and loss on inception. These investments are measured at fair value with all changes thereon being recognised in investment income. (ii) Financial investments on an available-for-sale basis – this comprises assets that are designated by management and/or do not fall into any of the other categories. These investments are carried at fair value. Interest income is recognised on an effective interest basis in the income statement. Unrealised gains and losses relating to changes in fair value are recognised in equity. Upon disposal or impairment, accumulated unrealised gains and losses are transferred from equity to the income statement as realised gains or losses. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 111 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued A4: Significant accounting policies continued (iii) Loans and receivables – this comprises investments that have fixed or determinable payments and are not designated as fair value through profit and loss or available-for-sale. These investments include loans collateralised by mortgages, deposits, loans to policyholders and other unsecured loans and receivables. These investments are carried at amortised cost using the effective interest method. The Group has designated certain financial assets as fair value through profit and loss as these assets are managed and their performance is evaluated on a fair value basis. These assets represent all of the Group’s financial assets except all loans and receivables and debt securities held by Jackson and Egg. Debt securities held by Jackson and Egg are accounted for on an available-for-sale basis. The use of the fair value option is consistent with the Group’s risk management and investment strategies. The Group uses the trade date method to account for regular purchases and sales of financial assets with the exception of Egg’s loans and advances to customers which are on a settlement day basis. Use of fair values The Group uses current bid prices to value its quoted investments. Actively traded investments without quoted prices are valued using external broker bid prices. If there is no active established market for an investment, the Group applies an appropriate valuation technique such as a discounted cash flow technique. Impairments The Group assesses at each balance sheet date whether there is objective evidence that a financial asset or group of financial assets not held at fair value through profit and loss is impaired. A financial asset or group of financial assets is impaired and impairment losses are incurred only if there is objective evidence of impairment as a result of one or more events that have occurred after the initial recognition of the asset (a loss event) and that a loss event (or events) has an impact on the estimated future cash flows of the financial asset or group of financial assets that can be reliably estimated. Objective evidence that a financial asset or group of financial assets is impaired includes observable data that comes to the attention of the Group. For assets designated as available-for-sale, the impairment is measured as the difference between the amortised cost of the asset and its fair value which is removed from the available-for-sale reserve within equity and recognised in the income statement. For loans and receivables carried at amortised cost, the impairment amount is the difference between amortised cost and the present value of the expected cash flows discounted at the original effective interest rate. If, in subsequent periods, an impaired debt security held on an available-for-sale basis or an impaired loan or receivable recovers in value (in part or in full), and this recovery can be objectively related to an event occurring after the impairment, then the previously recognised impairment loss is reversed through the income statement (in part or in full). Derivatives and hedge accounting Derivative financial instruments are used to reduce or manage investment, interest rate and currency exposures, to facilitate efficient portfolio management and for investment purposes. The Group’s policy is that amounts at risk through derivative transactions are covered by cash or by corresponding assets. The Group may designate certain derivatives as hedges. This includes fair value hedges, cash flow hedges and hedges of net investments in foreign operations. If the criteria for hedge accounting are met then the following accounting treatments are applied from the date at which the designation is made and the accompanying requisite documentation is in place: (i) Hedges of net investments in foreign operations – the effective portion of any change in fair value of derivatives or other financial instruments designated as net investment hedges are recognised in equity. The ineffective portion of changes in the fair value of the hedging instrument is recorded in the income statement. The gain or loss on the hedging instrument recognised directly in equity is recognised in the income statement on disposal of the foreign operation. (ii) Fair value hedges – movements in the fair value of the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk are recognised in the income statement. (iii) Cash flow hedges – the effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives designated as cash flow hedges is recognised in equity. Movements in fair value relating to the ineffective portion are booked in the income statement. Amounts recognised directly in equity are recorded in the income statement in the periods in which the hedged item affects profit or loss. P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V All derivatives that do not meet the relevant hedging criteria are carried at fair value with movements in fair value being recorded in the income statement. Embedded derivatives Embedded derivatives are held by various Group companies including Jackson and Egg. They are embedded within other non-derivative host financial instruments to create hybrid instruments. Where economic characteristics and risks of the embedded derivatives are not closely related to the economic characteristics and risks of the host instrument, and where the hybrid instrument is not measured at fair value with the changes in fair value recognised in the income statement, the embedded derivative is bifurcated and carried at fair value as a derivative in accordance with IAS 39. 112 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements A4: Significant accounting policies continued Securities lending including repurchase agreements The Group is party to various securities lending agreements under which securities are loaned to third parties on a short-term basis. The loaned securities are not derecognised; rather, they continue to be recognised within the appropriate investment classification. The Group’s policy is that collateral in excess of 100 per cent of the fair value of securities loaned is required from all securities borrowers and typically consists of cash, debt securities, equity securities or letters of credit. In cases where the Group takes possession of the collateral under its securities lending programme, the collateral, and corresponding obligation to return such collateral, are recognised in the consolidated balance sheet. To further minimise credit risk, the financial condition of counterparties is monitored on a regular basis. Derecognition of financial assets and liabilities The Group’s policy is to derecognise financial assets when it is deemed that substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred. The Group also derecognises a financial asset when the contractual rights to the cash flows from the financial asset expire. Where the Group neither transfers nor retains substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership, the Group will derecognise the financial asset where it is deemed that the Group has not retained control of the financial asset. Where the transfer does not result in the Group transferring the right to receive the cash flows of the financial assets, but does result in the Group assuming a corresponding obligation to pay the cash flows to another recipient, the financial assets are also accordingly derecognised providing all of the following conditions are met: • the Group has no obligation to pay amounts to the eventual recipients unless it collects the equivalent amounts from the original asset; • the Group is prohibited by the terms of the transfer contract from selling or pledging the original asset; and • the Group has an obligation to remit any cash flows it collects on behalf of the eventual recipients without material delay. The Group derecognises financial liabilities only when the obligation specified in the contract is discharged, cancelled or has expired. Securitisation of assets Egg has issued debt securities in order to finance certain portfolios of loan and investment assets. These obligations are secured on Egg’s assets. The securitised assets and the related liabilities are presented gross within the relevant headings in the balance sheet under the ‘gross presentation’ method. Borrowings Although initially recognised at fair value, net of transaction costs, borrowings, excluding liabilities of consolidated collateralised debt obligations, are subsequently accounted for on an amortised cost basis using the effective interest method. Under the effective interest method, the difference between the redemption value of the borrowing and the initial proceeds (net of related issue costs) is amortised through the income statement to the date of maturity. Financial liabilities designated at fair value through profit and loss The Group has designated under IAS 39 classification certain financial liabilities at fair value through profit and loss as these instruments are managed and their performance evaluated on a fair value basis. These instruments include liabilities related to consolidated collateralised debt obligations and net assets attributable to unit holders of consolidated unit trusts and similar funds. (b) Long-term business contracts Income statement treatment Premiums and claims Premium and annuity considerations for conventional with-profits policies and other protection type insurance policies are recognised when due. Premiums and annuity considerations for linked policies, unitised with-profits and other investment type policies are recognised when received or, in the case of unitised or unit-linked policies, when units are issued. These amounts exclude any taxes or duties assessed based on premiums. Policy fees charged on linked and unitised with-profits policies for mortality, asset management and policy administration are recognised as revenue when related services are provided. Claims paid include maturities, annuities, surrenders and deaths. Maturity claims are recorded on the policy maturity date. Annuity claims are recorded when the annuity becomes due for payment. Surrenders are recorded when paid and death claims are recorded when notified. For investment contracts which do not contain discretionary participating features, the accounting reflects the deposit nature of the arrangement, with premiums and claims reflected as deposits and withdrawals and taken directly to the balance sheet. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 113 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued A4: Significant accounting policies continued Acquisition costs Costs of acquiring new insurance business, principally commissions, marketing and advertising costs and certain other costs associated with policy issuance and underwriting that are not reimbursed by policy charges, are specifically identified and capitalised as part of deferred acquisition costs (DAC), which are included as an asset in the balance sheet. The DAC asset in respect of insurance contracts is amortised against margins in future revenues on the related insurance policies, to the extent that the amounts are recoverable out of the margins. Recoverability of the unamortised DAC asset is assessed at the time of policy issue and reviewed if profit margins have declined. Under IFRS, investment contracts (excluding those with discretionary participation features) are required to be accounted for as financial liabilities in accordance with IAS 39 and, where relevant, the provisions of IAS 18 in respect of the attaching investment management features of the contracts. The Group’s investment contracts primarily comprise of certain unit-linked savings contracts in the UK and Asia and contracts with fixed and guaranteed terms in the US (such as guaranteed investment contracts and annuity-certains). Incremental, directly attributable acquisition costs relating to the investment management element of these contracts are capitalised and amortised in line with the related revenue. If the contracts involve up-front charges, this income is also deferred and amortised through the income statement in line with contractual service provision. UK regulated with-profits funds The UK GAAP basis applied in 2004 was the MSB, which closely reflected the Peak 1 regulatory basis of the UK FSA. Prudential’s long-term business written in the UK comprises predominantly life insurance policies under which the policyholders are entitled to participate in the returns of the funds supporting these policies. Business similar to this type is also written in certain of the Group’s Asian operations and subject to local market and regulatory conditions. Such policies are called with-profits policies. Prudential maintains with-profits funds within the Group’s long-term business funds, which segregate the assets and liabilities and accumulate the returns related to that with-profits business. The amounts accumulated in these with-profits funds are available to provide for future policyholder benefit provisions and for bonuses to be distributed to with-profits policyholders. The bonuses, both annual and final, reflect the right of the with-profits policyholders to participate in the financial performance of the with-profits funds. Shareholders’ profits with respect to bonuses declared on with-profits business correspond to the shareholders’ share of the cost of bonuses as declared by the Board of directors. The shareholders’ share currently represents one-ninth of the cost of bonuses declared for with-profits policies. Annual bonuses are declared and credited each year to with-profits policies. The annual bonuses increase policy benefits and, once credited, become guaranteed. Annual bonuses are charged to the profit and loss account in the year declared. Final bonuses are declared each year and accrued for all policies scheduled to mature and for death benefits expected to be paid during the next financial year. Final bonuses are not guaranteed and are only paid on policies that result from claims through the death of the policyholder or maturity of the policy within the period of declaration or by concession on surrender. No policyholder benefit provisions are recorded for future annual or final bonus declarations. From 1 January 2005, the previous UK GAAP basis was replaced under a policy improvement to align with the UK accounting standard FRS 27, ‘Life Assurance’. FRS 27 is underpinned by the FSA’s Peak 2 basis of reporting. This Peak 2 basis, which came into effect for the first time for 2004 regulatory reporting, requires the value of liabilities to be calculated as: • a with-profits benefits reserve (WPBR); plus • future policy related liabilities (FPRL); plus • the realistic current liabilities of the fund. P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I The WPBR is primarily based on the retrospective calculation of accumulated asset shares but is adjusted to reflect future policyholder benefits and other outgoings. By contrast, the Peak 1 basis addresses, at least explicitly, only declared bonuses. P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V The FPRL must include a market consistent valuation of costs of guarantees, options and smoothing, less any related charges, and this amount is determined using either a stochastic approach, hedging costs or a series of deterministic projections with attributed probabilities. Under the Peak 1 basis there is an allowance on a deterministic basis for the intrinsic value of these costs. The assumptions used in the stochastic models are calibrated to produce risk-free returns on each asset class. Volatilities of, and correlations between, investment returns from different asset classes are as determined by the Group’s Portfolio Management Group but are also market consistent. The cost of guarantees, options and smoothing is very sensitive to the bonus, market value reduction (MVR) and investment policy the Group employs and therefore the stochastic modelling incorporates a range of management actions that would help to protect the fund in adverse scenarios. Substantial flexibility has been included in the modelled management actions in order to reflect the discretion that the Group retains in adverse investment conditions, thereby avoiding the creation of unreasonable minimum capital requirements. The management actions assumed are consistent with management’s policy for with-profits funds and the disclosures made in the publicly available Principles and Practices of Financial Management. 114 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements A4: Significant accounting policies continued Under FRS 27, the main changes that are required for UK with-profits funds are: • derecognition of deferred acquisition costs and related deferred tax; and • replacement of MSB liabilities for with-profits business with adjusted realistic basis liabilities. Adjusted realistic basis liabilities represent the Peak 2 basis realistic liabilities for with-profits business included in Form 19 of the FSA regulatory returns, but after excluding the element for the shareholders’ share of the future bonuses. This latter item is recognised as a liability for the purposes of regulatory returns but, for accounting purposes under FRS 27, consistent with the current basis of financial reporting, shareholder transfers are recognised only on declaration. Unallocated surplus The unallocated surplus represents the excess of assets over policyholder liabilities for the Group’s with-profits funds. In 2006 and 2005, as allowed under IFRS 4, the Group has opted to continue to record unallocated surplus of with-profits funds wholly as a liability. The annual excess (shortfall) of income over expenditure of the with-profits funds, after declaration and attribution of the cost of bonuses to policyholders and shareholders, is transferred to (from) the unallocated surplus each year through a charge (credit) to the income statement. The balance retained in the unallocated surplus represents cumulative income arising on the with-profits business that has not been allocated to policyholders or shareholders. The balance of the unallocated surplus is determined after full provision for deferred tax on unrealised appreciation on investments. Other insurance contracts (i.e. contracts which contain significant insurance risk as defined under IFRS 4) For these contracts UK GAAP has been applied, which reflects the MSB. Under this basis the following approach applies: Other UK insurance contracts Other UK insurance contracts that contain significant insurance risk include unit-linked, annuity and other non-profit business. For the purposes of local regulations, segregated accounts are established for linked business for which policyholder benefits are wholly or partly determined by reference to specific investments or to an investment-related index. The interest rates used in establishing policyholder benefit provisions for pension annuities in the course of payment are adjusted each year. Mortality rates used in establishing policyholder benefit provisions were based on published mortality tables adjusted to reflect actual experience. Overseas subsidiaries The assets and liabilities of insurance contracts of overseas subsidiaries are determined initially using local GAAP bases of accounting with subsequent adjustments where necessary to comply with the Group’s accounting policies. Jackson The future policyholder benefit provisions for Jackson’s conventional protection-type policies are determined using the net level premium method under US GAAP principles and assumptions as of the issue date as to mortality, interest, policy lapses and expenses plus provisions for adverse deviations. For non-conventional protection-type policies, the policyholder benefit provision included within policyholder liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet is the policyholder account balance. For the business of Jackson, the determination of the expected emergence of margins, against which the amortisation profile of the DAC asset is established, is dependent on certain key assumptions. For single premium deferred annuity business, the key assumption is the expected long-term spread between the earned rate and the rate credited to policyholders. For variable annuity business, the key assumption is the expected long-term level of equity market returns which, for 2006 and 2005, was 8.4 per cent per annum implemented using a mean reversion methodology. These returns affect the level of future expected profits through their effects on fee income and the required level of provision for guaranteed minimum death benefit claims. P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I Jackson accounts for the majority of its investment portfolio on an available-for-sale basis (see investment policies above) whereby unrealised gains and losses are recognised directly in equity. As permitted by IFRS 4, Jackson has used shadow accounting. Under shadow accounting, to the extent that recognition of unrealised gains or losses on available-for-sale securities causes adjustments to the carrying value and amortisation patterns of deferred acquisition costs and deferred income, these adjustments are recognised directly in equity to be consistent with the treatment of the gains or losses on the securities. Asian operations The future policyholder benefit provisions for Asian businesses are determined in accordance with methods prescribed by local GAAP adjusted to comply, where necessary, with UK GAAP. For the Hong Kong business, which is a branch of the PAC, and the Singapore and Malaysian operations the valuation principles and sensitivities to changes of assumptions of conventional with-profits and other protection-type policies are similar to those described above for equivalent products written by the UK operations. P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V For Asian operations in countries where local GAAP is not well established and in which the business written is primarily non-participating and linked business, US GAAP is used as the most appropriate proxy to local GAAP. The future policyholder benefit provisions for non- linked business are determined using the net level premium method, with an allowance for surrenders, maintenance and claim expenses. Rates of interest used in establishing the policyholder benefit provisions vary by operation depending on the circumstances attaching to each block of business. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 115 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued A4: Significant accounting policies continued Although the basis of valuation of Prudential’s overseas operations is in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 1985 and ABI SORP, the valuation of policyholder benefit provisions for these businesses may differ from that determined on a UK MSB for UK operations with the same features. Liability adequacy The Group performs liability adequacy testing on its insurance provisions to ensure that the carrying amounts of provisions (less related deferred acquisition costs and present value of in-force business – see policy on Business Acquisitions and Disposals) is sufficient to cover current estimates of future cash flows. When performing the liability adequacy test, the Group discounts all contractual cash flows and compares this amount to the carrying value of the liability. Any deficiency is immediately charged to the income statement. Reinsurance In the normal course of business, the Group seeks to reduce loss exposure by reinsuring certain levels of risk in various areas of exposure with other insurance companies or reinsurers. An asset or liability is recognised in the consolidated balance sheet representing premiums due to or payments due from reinsurers and the share of losses recoverable from reinsurers. The measurement of reinsurance assets is consistent with the measurement of the underlying direct insurance contracts. Gains arising on the purchase of reinsurance contracts by Jackson are deferred and amortised over the contract duration. Any loss is recognised in the income statement immediately. Investment contracts (contracts which do not contain significant insurance risk as defined under IFRS 4) For investment contracts with discretionary participation features, the accounting basis is consistent with the accounting for similar with- profits insurance contracts. Other investment contracts are accounted for on a basis that reflects the hybrid nature of the arrangements whereby part is accounted for as a financial instrument under IAS 39 and the investment management service component is accounted for under IAS 18. For those investment contracts in the US with fixed and guaranteed terms, the Group uses the amortised cost model to measure the liability. On contract inception, the liability is measured at fair value less incremental, directly attributable acquisition costs. Remeasurement at future reporting dates is on an amortised cost basis utilising an effective interest rate methodology whereby the interest rate utilised discounts to the net carrying amount of the financial liability. Those investment contracts without fixed and guaranteed terms are designated at fair value through profit and loss. Fair value is based upon the fair value of the underlying assets of the fund. Where the contract includes a surrender option its carrying value is subject to a minimum carrying value equal to its surrender value. (c) Other assets, liabilities, income and expenditure Basis of consolidation The Group consolidates those entities it is deemed to control. The degree of control is determined by the ability of the Group to govern the financial and operating policies of an entity in order to obtain benefits. Consideration is given to other factors such as potential voting rights. The Group has consolidated some special purpose entities (SPEs), such as funds holding collateralised debt obligations (CDOs) where equity investors do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties. These SPEs are consolidated because the Group is deemed to control them under IFRS. The Group holds investments in internally and externally managed Open-ended Investment Companies (OEICs) and unit trusts. The Group’s percentage ownership levels in these entities can fluctuate from day to day according to changes in the Group’s and third party participation in the funds. In instances where the Group’s ownership of internally managed funds declines marginally below 50 per cent and, based on historical analysis and future expectations the decline in ownership is expected to be temporary, the funds continue to be consolidated as subsidiaries under IAS 27. P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Where the Group exercises significant influence or has the power to exercise significant influence over an entity, generally through ownership of 20 per cent or more of the entity’s voting rights, but does not control the entity, then this is considered to be an investment in an associate. With the exception of those referred to below, the Group’s investments in associates are recorded at the Group’s share of the associates’ net assets. The carrying value of investments in associates is adjusted each year for the Group’s share of the entities’ profit or loss. This does not apply to investments in associates held by the Group’s insurance or investment funds including the venture capital business or mutual funds and unit trusts, which are carried at fair value through profit and loss. The Group’s investments in joint ventures are recognised using proportional consolidation whereby the Group’s share of an entity’s individual balances are combined line-by-line with similar items into the Group financial statements. Other interests in entities, where significant influence is not exercised, are carried as investments at fair value through profit and loss. 116 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements A4: Significant accounting policies continued The consolidated financial statements of the Group include the assets, liabilities and results of the Company and subsidiary undertakings in which Prudential has a controlling interest, using accounts drawn up to 31 December 2006 except where entities have non-coterminous year ends. In such cases, the information consolidated is based on the accounting period of these entities and is adjusted for material changes up to 31 December. Accordingly, the information consolidated is deemed to cover the same period for all entities throughout the Group. The results of subsidiaries are included in the financial statements from the date acquired to the effective date of disposal. All inter-company transactions are eliminated on consolidation. Results of investment management activities include those for managing internal funds. Investment properties Investments in tenant occupied leasehold and freehold properties are carried at fair value, with changes in fair value included in the income statement. Properties are valued annually either by the Group’s qualified surveyors or professional external valuers using the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) guidelines. The RICS guidelines apply separate assumptions to the value of the land, buildings and tenancy associated with each property. Each property is externally valued at least once every three years. The cost of additions and renovations is capitalised and considered when estimating fair value. Leases of investment property where the Group has substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership are classified as finance leases (leasehold property). Finance leases are capitalised at the lease’s inception at the lower of the fair value of the leased property and the present value of the minimum lease payments. Where a lease has a contingent rent element, the rent is calculated in accordance with individual lease terms and charged as an expense as incurred. Pension schemes The Group operates a number of pension schemes around the world. The largest of these schemes is the PSPS, a defined benefit scheme. The Group also operates defined contribution schemes. Defined contribution schemes are schemes where the Company pays contributions into a fund and the Company has no legal or constructive obligation to pay further contributions should the assets of that fund be insufficient to pay the employee benefits relating to employee service in both current and prior periods. Defined benefit schemes are post-employment benefit plans that are not defined contribution schemes. For the Group’s defined benefit schemes, if the present value of the defined benefit obligation exceeds the fair value of the scheme assets, then a liability is recorded in the Group’s balance sheet. The Group utilises the projected unit credit method to calculate the defined benefit obligation. Estimated future cash flows are then discounted at a high-quality corporate bond rate to determine its present value. These calculations are performed by independent actuaries. The plan assets of the Group’s pension schemes exclude several insurance contracts that have been issued by the Group. These assets are excluded from plan assets in determining the pension obligation recognised in the consolidated balance sheet. The aggregate of the actuarially determined service costs of the currently employed personnel and the unwind of discount on liabilities at the start of the period, less the expected investment return on scheme assets at the start of the period, is charged to the income statement. Actuarial gains and losses as a result of changes in assumptions or experience variances are also charged or credited to the income statement. Contributions to the Group’s defined contribution schemes are expensed when due. Once paid, the Group has no further payment obligations. Any prepayments are reflected as an asset on the balance sheet. Share-based payments The Group offers share award and option plans for certain key employees and a Save As You Earn (SAYE) plan for all UK and certain overseas employees. The arrangements for distribution to employees of shares held in trust relating to share award plans and for entitlement to dividends depend upon the particular terms of each plan. Shares held in trust relating to these plans are conditionally gifted to employees. P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I The compensation expense charged to the income statement is primarily based upon the fair value of the options granted, the vesting period and the vesting conditions. The Group revises its estimate of the number of options likely to be exercised at each balance sheet date and adjusts the charge to the income statement accordingly. Where the share-based payment depends upon vesting outcomes attaching to market-based performance conditions, additional modelling is performed to estimate the fair value of the awards. No subsequent adjustment is then made to the fair value charge for awards that do not vest on account of these performance conditions not being met. The Company has established trusts to facilitate the delivery of Prudential plc shares under employee incentive plans and savings-related share option schemes. None of the trusts that hold shares for employee incentive and savings plans continue to hold these shares once they are issued to employees. The cost to the Company of acquiring these treasury shares held in trusts is shown as a deduction from shareholders’ equity. P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 117 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued A4: Significant accounting policies continued Tax The Group’s UK subsidiaries each file separate tax returns. Jackson and other foreign subsidiaries, where permitted, file consolidated income tax returns. In accordance with UK tax legislation, where one domestic UK company is a 75 per cent owned subsidiary of another UK company or both are 75 per cent owned subsidiaries of a common parent, the companies are considered to be within the same UK tax group. For companies within the same tax group, trading profits and losses arising in the same accounting period may be offset for purposes of determining current and deferred taxes. Current tax expense is charged or credited to operations based upon amounts estimated to be payable or recoverable as a result of taxable operations for the current year. To the extent that losses of an individual UK company are not offset in any one year, they can be carried back for one year or carried forward indefinitely to be offset against profits arising from the same company. Deferred taxes are provided under the liability method for all relevant temporary differences, being the difference between the carrying amount of an asset or liability in the balance sheet and its value for tax purposes. IAS 12, ‘Income Taxes’ does not require all temporary differences to be provided for, in particular, the Group does not provide for deferred tax on undistributed earnings of subsidiaries where the Group is able to control the timing of the distribution and the temporary difference created is not expected to reverse in the foreseeable future. The tax effects of losses available for carry forward are recognised as an asset. Deferred tax assets are only recognised when it is probable that future taxable profits will be available against which these losses can be utilised. Deferred tax related to charges or credits taken directly to equity is also credited or charged directly to equity and is subsequently recognised in the income statement together with the deferred gain or loss. The tax charge for long-term business includes tax expense on with-profits funds attributable to both the policyholders and the shareholders. Different tax rules apply under UK law depending upon whether the business is life insurance or pension business. Tax on the life insurance business is based on investment returns less expenses attributable to that business. Tax on the pension business is based on the shareholders’ profits or losses attributable to that business. The shareholders’ portion of the long-term business is taxed at the shareholders’ rate with the remaining portion taxed at rates applicable to the policyholders. Basis of presentation of tax charges Historically, under Companies Act requirements, tax charges attributable to policyholders and unallocated surplus of with-profits funds and unit-linked policies were charged, together with tax charges attributable to the long-term business result attributable to shareholders, as an expense in the long-term business technical account of the profit and loss account. In the non-technical section (i.e. the summary profit and loss section attributable to shareholders) the post-tax balance transferred from the long-term business technical account was grossed up by attributable shareholder tax to derive the pre-shareholder tax long-term business result. Tax charges in the non-technical account reflected the aggregate of the shareholder tax on the long-term business result and on the Group’s other results. Under UK Listing Authority rules, profit before tax is required to be presented. This requirement, coupled with the fact that IFRS does not contemplate tax charges which are attributable to policyholders and unallocated surplus of with-profits funds and unit-linked policies, necessitates the reporting of total tax charges within the presented results. The result before all taxes (i.e. ‘profit before tax’ as shown in the income statement) represents income net of post-tax transfers to unallocated surplus of with-profits funds, before tax attributable to policyholders and unallocated surplus of with-profits funds, unit-linked policies and shareholders. Separately within the income statement, ‘profit before tax attributable to shareholders’ is shown after deduction of taxes attributable to policyholders and unallocated surplus of with-profits funds and unit-linked policies. Tax charges on this measure of profit reflect the tax charges attributable to shareholders. In determining the tax charges attributable to shareholders, the Group has applied a methodology consistent with that previously applied under UK GAAP reflecting the broad principles underlying the tax legislation of life assurance companies. Property, plant and equipment All property, plant and equipment such as owner occupied property, computer equipment and furniture and fixtures, are carried at depreciated cost. Costs including expenditure directly attributable to the acquisition of the assets are capitalised. Depreciation is calculated and charged on a straight-line basis over an asset’s estimated useful life. The residual values and useful lives are reviewed at each balance sheet date. If the carrying amount of an asset is greater than its recoverable amount then its carrying value is written down to that recoverable amount. Leasehold improvements to owner occupied property are depreciated over the life of the lease. Assets held under finance leases are capitalised at their fair value. Business acquisitions and disposals Business acquisitions are accounted for by applying the purchase method of accounting, which adjusts the net assets of the acquired company to fair value at the date of purchase. The excess of the costs of acquisition over the fair value of the assets and liabilities of the acquired entity is recorded as goodwill. Should the fair value of the identifiable assets and liabilities of the entity exceed the cost of acquisition then this amount is recognised immediately in the income statement. Income and expenses of acquired entities are included in the income statement from the date of acquisition. Revenues and expenses of entities sold during the period are included in the income statement up to the date of disposal. The gain or loss on disposal is calculated as the difference between sale proceeds, net of selling costs, less the net assets of the entity at the date of disposal. 118 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements A4: Significant accounting policies continued For life insurance company acquisitions, the adjusted net assets include an identifiable intangible asset for the present value of in-force business which represents the profits that are expected to emerge from the acquired insurance business. The present value of in-force business is calculated using best estimate actuarial assumptions for interest, mortality, persistency and expenses and is amortised over the anticipated lives of the related contracts in the portfolio. An intangible asset may also be recognised in respect of acquired investment management contracts representing the fair value of contractual rights acquired under these contracts. The Company uses the economic entity method to purchase minority interests. Under the economic entity method any difference between consideration and the share of net assets acquired is recorded directly in equity. Goodwill Goodwill arising on acquisitions of subsidiaries and businesses is capitalised and carried on the Group balance sheet as an intangible asset at initial value less any accumulated impairment losses. Goodwill impairment testing is conducted annually and when there is an indication of impairment. For the purposes of impairment testing, goodwill is allocated to cash generating units. These cash generating units reflect the smallest group of assets that includes the goodwill and generates cash flows that are largely independent of the cash inflows from other groups of assets. If the carrying amount of the cash generating unit exceeds its recoverable amount then the goodwill is considered impaired. Impairment losses are recognised immediately in the income statement and may not be reversed in future periods. Acquired intangible assets Intangible assets acquired on the purchase of a subsidiary or portfolio of contracts are valued at acquisition and carried at amortised cost. Amortisation calculated is charged on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the assets. The residual values and useful lives are reviewed at each balance sheet date. Cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash at bank and in hand, deposits held at call with banks, treasury bills and other short-term highly liquid investments with less than 90 days maturity from the date of acquisition. Rights of offset Assets and liabilities in the consolidated financial statements are only reported on a net basis when there is a legally enforceable right to offset and there is an intention to settle on a net basis. Segments In accordance with IAS 14, ‘Segment Reporting’ the Group reports its results and certain other financial information by primary and secondary segments. The Group’s primary segments are its business segments, namely, long-term business, banking and broker-dealer and fund management. The Group’s secondary segments are its geographical segments, namely, UK, US and Asia. Shareholders’ dividends Dividends to shareholders are recognised as a liability in the period in which they are declared. Where scrip dividends are issued, the value of such shares, measured as the amount of the cash dividend alternative, is credited to reserves and the amount in excess of the nominal value of the shares issued is transferred from the share premium account to retained earnings. Share capital Where there is no obligation to transfer assets, shares are classified as equity. The difference between the proceeds received on issue of the shares, net of share issue costs, and the nominal value of the shares issued, is credited to share premium. Where the Company purchases shares for the purposes of employee incentive plans, the consideration paid, net of issue costs, is deducted from retained earnings. Upon issue or sale any consideration received is credited to retained earnings net of related costs. P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I Foreign exchange The Group’s consolidated financial statements are presented in pounds sterling, the Group’s presentation currency. Accordingly, the results and financial position of foreign subsidiaries must be translated into the presentation currency of the Group from their functional currencies, i.e. the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates. All assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries are converted at year end exchange rates whilst all income and expenses are converted at average exchange rates where this is a reasonable approximation of the rates prevailing on transaction dates. The impact of these currency translations is recorded as a separate component of equity. Foreign currency borrowings that have been used to provide a hedge against Group equity investments in overseas subsidiaries, are translated at year end exchange rates and taken directly to shareholders’ equity. Other foreign currency monetary items are translated at year end exchange rates with changes recognised in the income statement. Foreign currency transactions are translated at the spot rate prevailing at the time. P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 119 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued A4: Significant accounting policies continued (d) Presentation of supplementary analysis of profit before tax attributable to shareholders The Group provides supplementary analysis of profit before tax attributable to shareholders that distinguishes operating profit based on longer-term investment returns from other constituent elements of the total profit. Operating profit based on longer-term investment returns Prior to the adoption of IFRS, under UK GAAP, the Group used operating profit based on longer-term investment returns before amortisation of goodwill as a supplemental measure of its results. For the purposes of measuring operating profit, investment returns on shareholder-financed business were based on the expected longer-term rates of return. Under IFRS, the Group continues to use operating profit based on longer-term investment returns as a supplemental measure of its results. In determining profit on this basis the following key elements are applied to the results of the Group’s shareholder-financed operations. (i) Debt securities and equity securities Longer-term investment returns comprise income and longer-term capital returns. For debt securities the longer-term capital returns comprise two elements. These are a risk margin reserve based charge for expected defaults, which is determined by reference to the credit quality of the portfolio, and amortisation of interest-related realised gains and losses to operating results based on longer-term investment returns to the date when sold bonds would have otherwise matured. (ii) Derivative value movements Value movements for Jackson’s equity-based derivatives and variable annuity product embedded derivatives are included in operating profits based on longer-term investment returns. The inclusion of these movements is so as to broadly match with the results on the Jackson variable annuity book that pertain to equity market movements. Other derivative value movements are excluded from operating results based on longer-term investment returns. These derivatives are primarily held by Jackson as part of a broadly-based hedging programme for features of Jackson’s bond portfolio (for which value movements are booked directly to shareholders’ equity rather than income statement) and product liabilities (for which US GAAP accounting does not reflect the economic features being hedged). These key elements are of most importance in determining the operating results based on longer-term investment returns of Jackson. Items excluded from operating profit based on longer-term investment returns Items excluded from operating profit based on longer-term investment returns but included in profit before tax attributable to shareholders of continuing operations, include goodwill impairment charges, short-term fluctuations in investment returns (i.e. actual less longer-term returns), actuarial gains and losses on defined benefit pension schemes and exceptional items. With the exception of derivatives used for managing equity exposure of Jackson and other derivatives where value movements match other items in operating results based on longer-term investment returns, value movements on derivatives held by Jackson are included within short-term fluctuations. For the purposes of distinguishing actuarial gains and losses on defined benefit pension schemes in this analysis, plan assets include Prudential policies held by the schemes. 120 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements A5: Adoption of IAS 32, IAS 39 and IFRS 4 at 1 January 2005 The standards of IAS 32, IAS 39 and IFRS 4 were adopted on 1 January 2005. The principal effects of adopting these standards arose in the Group’s UK long-term business contracts, Jackson’s debt securities and derivative instruments and Egg’s banking assets, liabilities and derivatives positions. The following table demonstrates the effects of adoption of IAS 32, IAS 39 and IFRS 4 on the IFRS balance sheet at 1 January 2005. Effect of adoption of IAS 32, IAS 39 and IFRS 4 UK insurance operations (note i) £m At 31 Dec 2004 £m Banking and non- insurance operations (note iii) £m Grossing-up and other format changes £m Jackson (note ii) £m Total effect £m At 1 Jan 2005 £m Assets Intangible assets attributable to shareholders: Goodwill Deferred acquisition costs and acquired in-force value of long-term business Total Intangible assets attributable to PAC with-profits fund: In respect of acquired venture fund investment subsidiaries Deferred acquisition costs Total Total Other non-investment and non-cash assets: Property, plant and equipment Reinsurers’ share of policyholder liabilities Deferred tax assets Current tax recoverable Accrued investment income Other debtors Total Investments of long-term business, banking and other operations: Investment properties Investments accounted for using the equity method Financial investments: Loans and receivables Equity securities and portfolio holdings in unit trusts Debt securities Other investments Deposits Total investments Held for sale assets Cash and cash equivalents Total assets 1,461 2,244 3,705 858 798 1,656 5,361 967 1,018 827 159 1,733 1,171 5,875 13,303 5 12,430 54,466 76,374 2,537 5,271 (456) (1,198) 4,163 23 23 (456) (456) (765) (765) (742) 10 67 (1) 66 10 (55) (21) (76) 1 6 1,023 234 5 1,262 1,461 1,811 3,272 858 33 891 (433) (433) (765) (765) 7 (50) (49) (92) 58 (2) 89 145 84 (50) (50) (16) 967 1,018 911 159 1,683 1,121 5,859 13,303 5 3 12,433 (21) 54,445 77,319 945 2,956 419 5,255 (16) 1,330 165,716 100 4,341 95 (27) 68 164,386 (145) 100 4,341 180,063 (877) 872 53 68 116 180,179 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 121 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued A5: Adoption of IAS 32, IAS 39 and IFRS 4 at 1 January 2005 continued P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I Equity and liabilities Equity Shareholders’ equity Minority interests Total equity Liabilities Banking customer accounts Policyholder liabilities and unallocated surplus: Insurance contract liabilities Investment contract liabilities with discretionary participation features Unallocated surplus of the with-profits funds: Reflecting application of ‘realistic’ basis provisions for UK regulated with-profits funds Reflecting previous UK GAAP basis of provisioning Investment contract liabilities without discretionary participation features Technical provisions in respect of non-linked business Technical provisions for linked liabilities Total policyholder liabilities Core structural borrowings of shareholder-financed operations: Subordinated debt (other than Egg) Other Egg subordinated debt Total Operational borrowings attributable to shareholder-financed operations Borrowings attributable to with-profits funds Other non-insurance liabilities: Obligations under funding, securities lending and sale and repurchase agreements Net asset value attributable to unit holders of consolidated unit trusts and similar funds Current tax liabilities Deferred tax liabilities Accruals and deferred income Other creditors Provisions Other liabilities Total other non-insurance liabilities Total liabilities Total equity and liabilities P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Notes The changes shown above include the impact of remeasurement for: (i) UK insurance operations 1,429 1,368 2,797 451 3,248 6,421 2,137 3,819 808 1,018 2,350 655 1,009 1,006 1,175 11,840 175,437 180,063 Effect of adoption of IAS 32, IAS 39 and IFRS 4 UK insurance operations (note i) £m At 31 Dec 2004 £m Banking and non- insurance operations (note iii) £m Grossing-up and other format changes £m Jackson (note ii) £m Total effect £m At 1 Jan 2005 £m 4,489 137 4,626 6,607 (22) 273 (22) 273 (25) (3) (28) 84 226 (3) 223 4,715 134 4,849 84 6,691 103,582 103,582 103,582 22,661 22,661 22,661 16,122 (7,807) 8,315 (8,315) 8,315 (16,122) 8,315 104,996 24,066 145,184 7,020 (51) (787) (51) 9,788 9,788 (111,965) (104,996) (24,066) (24,066) 9,788 (838) 144,346 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 (4) 121 (88) (46) 403 386 1,434 1,368 2,802 451 3,253 6,677 2,137 3,819 808 1,014 2,471 567 963 1,006 1,578 12,226 (107) 175,330 116 180,179 207 62 (13) 256 (91) 8 15 (68) (855) (877) (4) 218 229 443 599 872 (6) (88) (54) 83 (65) 81 53 76 76 68 68 (a) The reduction in shareholders’ equity of £22 million includes £20 million relating to certain unit-linked and similar contracts that do not contain significant insurance risk and are therefore categorised as investment contracts under IFRS 4. 122 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements A5: Adoption of IAS 32, IAS 39 and IFRS 4 at 1 January 2005 continued Notes continued (b) Changes to insurance assets and liabilities of the PAC with-profits fund following the improvement of accounting policy applied on adoption of IFRS 4. The changes correspond to those applicable if the Group had adopted FRS 27 under UK GAAP. As a result of the policy improvement, liabilities, deferred acquisition costs, deferred tax and unallocated surplus of UK regulated with-profits funds are remeasured as described in note A4. At 1 January 2005, the unallocated surplus is subject to a transition adjustment of £(7.8) billion. Shareholders’ equity is not affected by this change. The unallocated surplus of £8.3 billion at 1 January 2005 post-IAS 39 and IFRS 4 adoption, comprises £8.0 billion for the PAC with-profits fund and £0.3 billion for Asian subsidiaries. The £8.0 billion for the PAC with-profits fund represents: Regulatory basis realistic surplus of with-profits sub-fund and SAIF Add back: regulatory basis provision for future shareholder transfers Less: other adjustments to align with accounting basis Accounts basis £bn 6.0 2.9 (0.9) 8.0 (ii) Jackson Under IAS 39, Jackson’s debt securities and derivative financial instruments are remeasured to fair value from the lower of amortised cost and, if relevant, impaired value. Fair value movements on debt securities, net of ‘shadow’ changes to deferred acquisition costs and related deferred tax are recorded directly to equity. Fair value movements on derivatives are recorded in the income statement. (iii) Banking and non-insurance operations Under IAS 39, for Egg, changes to opening equity at 1 January 2005 arise from altered policies for effective interest rate on credit card receivables, impairment losses on loans and advances, fair value adjustments on wholesale financial instruments and embedded derivatives in equity savings products. The net effect on shareholders’ equity of these changes, after tax, is a deduction of £15 million. A further £10 million reduction in equity arises on fair valuation of certain centrally held financial instruments and derivatives. A6: New accounting pronouncements The following standards, interpretations and amendments have either been effective and adopted in 2006 or have been issued but are not yet effective in 2006. This is not intended to be a complete list as only those standards, interpretations and amendments that are anticipated to have an impact upon the Group’s financial statements have been discussed. Accounting pronouncements adopted in 2006 Amendment to IAS 39, ‘Cash Flow Hedge Accounting of Forecast Intra-Group Transactions’ Amendments in respect of cash flow hedge accounting of forecast intra-group transactions were issued in April 2005 to clarify the accounting treatment of certain foreign currency cash flow hedges. The amendments are effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2006. Amendment to IAS 39 and IFRS 4, ‘Financial Guarantee Contracts’ Issued in August 2005, the amendments to IAS 39 and IFRS 4 in respect of financial guarantee contracts are effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2006. These amendments define a financial guarantee contract and address initial and subsequent measurement issues. These amendments apply even if the contract meets the definition of an insurance contract under IFRS 4 although they allow continuation of accounting under IFRS 4 if the contracts were considered to be insurance contracts and documented as such. Amendment to IAS 21, ‘Net Investment in a Foreign Operation’ Issued in December 2005, the amendments to IAS 21 clarify the definition of a foreign operation and the recognition of exchange difference in a net investment in a foreign operation. The amendments are effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2006. The adoption of these aforementioned amendments did not have a material impact on the financial statements of the Group. Accounting pronouncements not yet effective IFRS 7, ‘Financial Instruments: Disclosures’ IFRS 7 replaces IAS 30, ‘Disclosures in the Financial Statements of Banks and Similar Financial Institutions’, which dealt with disclosures for banking operations, and the disclosure requirements of IAS 32, ‘Financial Instruments: Disclosure and Presentation’. The latter, therefore, becomes a standard dealing wholly with presentation of financial instruments. IFRS 7 is intended to complement the principles for recognising, measuring and presenting financial assets and financial liabilities in IAS 32 and IAS 39, ‘Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement’. The objective of IFRS 7 is to require entities to provide disclosures in their financial statements to enable the users of financial statements to evaluate the significance of financial instruments for the entity’s financial position and performance and the nature and extent of risks arising from financial instruments to which the entity is exposed and how the entity manages those risks. Consequential amendments have been made to other standards as a result of the release of IFRS 7, notably IAS 1, ‘Presentation of Financial Statements’, and IFRS 4, ‘Insurance Contracts’. IFRS 7 was issued on 18 August 2005 and is effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2007. Revised IFRS 4, ‘Implementation Guidance’ Revised IFRS 4, ‘Implementation Guidance’, was issued in December 2005 and is effective in conjunction with the adoption of IFRS 7 as discussed above. The revisions relate to disclosures around insurance contracts. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 123 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued A6: New accounting pronouncements continued Amendment to IAS 1, ‘Capital Disclosures’ As a result of the issue of IFRS 7, IAS 1 was amended in August 2005 to include a requirement to disclose information on the entity’s objectives, policies and processes for managing capital. This amendment will become effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2007. IFRS 8, ‘Operating Segments’ IFRS 8 requires entities to adopt the ‘management approach’ to reporting the financial performance of its operating segments. The amount of each operating segment item to be reported is the measure reported to the chief operating decision maker, which in some instances will be non-GAAP. IFRS 8 will require the Group to provide an explanation of the basis on which the segment information is prepared and a reconciliation to the amount recognised in the Group’s consolidated financial statements. This standard is effective for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2009. IFRIC 9, ‘Reassessment of Embedded Derivatives’ IFRIC 9 will require the Group to assess whether an embedded derivative is required to be separated from the host contract and accounted for as a derivative when it first becomes a party to the contract. Subsequent reassessment is prohibited unless there is a change in the terms of the contract that significantly modifies the cash flows that otherwise would be required under the contract, in which case a reassessment is required. This interpretation became effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 June 2006. IFRIC 10, ‘Interim Financial Reporting and Impairment’ IFRIC 10 addresses the apparent conflict between the requirements of IAS 34, ‘Interim Financial Reporting’, and those in other standards on the recognition and reversal in financial statements of impairment losses on goodwill and certain financial assets. IFRIC 10 states that any such impairment losses recognised in an interim financial statement may not be reversed in subsequent interim or annual financial statements. This interpretation became effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 November 2006. The Group is currently assessing the impact of the aforementioned standards, interpretations and amendments on its financial statements. The Group has not early adopted any of the above noted items. 124 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements B: Summary of results B1: Supplementary analysis of profit from continuing operations before tax attributable to shareholders This information is provided as supplementary information under the Group’s accounting policies. It is not required by IFRS standards. UK operations UK insurance operations (note ii) M&G Egg Total US operations Jackson (notes ii and iii) Broker-dealer and fund management (including Curian losses of £8m (2005: £10m)) Total Asian operations Long-term business (note ii) Fund management (note iv) Development expenses Total Other income and expenditure Investment return and other income Interest payable on core structural borrowings Corporate expenditure: Group Head Office Asia Regional Head Office Charge for share-based payments for Prudential schemes (note viii) Total UK restructuring costs (note ix) Operating profit from continuing operations based on longer-term investment returns (note i) Goodwill impairment charge (note v) Short-term fluctuations in investment returns on shareholder-backed business (note vi) Shareholders’ share of actuarial and other gains and losses on defined benefit pension schemes (note vii) 2006 £m 500 204 (145) 559 398 10 408 189 50 (15) 224 58 (177) (83) (36) (10) (248) (50) 893 – 162 167 Profit from continuing operations before tax attributable to shareholders 1,222 2005 £m 400 163 44 607 348 14 362 195 12 (20) 187 87 (175) (70) (30) (11) (199) – 957 (120) 211 (50) 998 Notes (i) Operating profit based on longer-term investment returns Operating profit based on longer-term investment returns is a supplemental measure of results. For the purposes of measuring operating profit, investment returns on shareholder-financed business are based on expected long-term rates of return. The expected long-term rates of return are intended to reflect historical real rates of return and, where appropriate, current inflation expectations adjusted for consensus economic and investment forecasts. The significant operations that require adjustment for the difference between actual and long-term investment returns are Jackson and certain businesses of the Group’s Asian operations. The amounts included in operating results for long-term capital returns for debt securities comprise two components. These are a risk margin reserve based charge for expected defaults, which is determined by reference to the credit quality of the portfolio, and amortisation of interest-related gains and losses for operating results based on longer-term results to the date when sold bonds would otherwise have matured. (ii) Effect of changes to assumptions, estimates and bases of determining life assurance liabilities The results of the Group’s long-term business operations are affected by changes of assumptions and bases of preparation. These are described in notes D2(f), D3(f) and D4(f). In particular, the operating result for UK insurance operations for 2006 has benefited from a credit of £46 million due to altered regulatory requirements, as explained in note D2(f), whilst the operating result for Asian long-term business in 2005 benefited by a net of £52 million for changes in Singapore and Taiwan as described in note D4(f). (iii) Jackson – Summary of operating results (a) IFRS basis operating profits include the following longer-term investment returns (net of related change in amortisation of deferred acquisition costs) Longer-term returns on debt securities: Amortisation of interest-related gains (net of related change in amortisation of deferred acquisition costs) Risk margin reserve charge in respect of credit-related losses (net of related change in amortisation of deferred acquisition costs) (note b) Total Longer-term returns on equity type investments 2006 £m 38 (44) (6) 45 2005 £m 46 (45) 1 38 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 125 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued B1: Supplementary analysis of profit from continuing operations before tax attributable to shareholders continued Notes continued (b) The risk margin reserve (RMR) charge for 2006 is based on an average annual RMR of 23 basis points (2005: 24 basis points) on a book value of US$43.9bn (2005: US$43.3bn) (iv) Asian fund management business Operating profit for the Asian fund management business of £12 million for 2005 was determined after an exceptional cost of £16 million incurred in Taiwan due to bond fund restructuring required as a result of industry-wide regulatory change. (v) Goodwill impairment charge The charge for goodwill impairment of £120 million in 2005 related to the Japan life business. There was no impairment charge for goodwill in 2006. Further details of the Group’s goodwill are shown in notes H1 and H2. (vi) Short-term fluctuations in investment returns on shareholder-backed business The fluctuations arise as follows: US operations: Movements in market value of derivatives (other than equity-based) used for economic hedging purposes Actual less longer-term investment returns for other items Asian operations Other operations (vii) Shareholders’ share of actuarial and other gains and losses on defined benefit pension schemes Actuarial gains and losses Actual less expected return on scheme assets Experience gains on liabilities Gains (losses) on changes of assumptions for scheme liabilities Less: amount attributable to the PAC with-profits sub-fund Non-recurrent credit (charge) Shareholders’ share of credit arising from reduction in level of assumed future discretionary increases for Prudential Staff Pension Scheme (PSPS) for pensions in payment to 2.5% Losses on re-estimation of shareholders’ share of deficits arising from the PSPS (a) Strengthening in actuarial provisions for increase in ongoing contributions for future service of active scheme members (b) Total 2006 £m 34 20 134 (26) 162 2006 £m 156 18 311 485 (318) 167 – – – – 167 2005 £m 122 56 32 1 211 2005 £m 544 1 (489) 56 (58) (2) 35 (63) (20) (48) (50) (a) Up to 31 December 2004, the deficits arising on the PSPS had been assessed as being 80 per cent attributable to the PAC with-profits fund and 20 per cent to shareholder operations. In 2005, following additional analysis this apportionment was altered so that a ratio of 70/30 was applied to the PSPS deficit at 31 December 2005. For 2006, the opening deficit of the PSPS scheme has been allocated in the ratios 70/30 between the with-profits fund and shareholder-backed operations. The ratio has continued to be applied to movements in the financial position that relate to opening assets and liabilities. However, the service charge and contributions for ongoing service are allocated by reference to the cost allocation for current business. (b) As a result of the April 2005 scheme valuation and subsequent discussions, the contribution levels for future ongoing service of active members were approximately doubled. The charge of £20 million in 2005 reflected the actuarial provision for this increase in expenses for certain insurance contracts. Further details on the Group’s defined benefit pension schemes are shown in note I1. (viii) Share-based payments The charge for share-based payments for Prudential schemes is for the SAYE and Group performance-related schemes. (ix) UK restructuring costs are allocated as follows: UK insurance operations M&G Egg Unallocated corporate £m 31 2 12 5 50 126 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements B2: Earnings per share Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing the earnings attributable to ordinary shareholders by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the year, excluding those held in employee share trusts, which are treated as cancelled. For diluted earnings per share, the weighted average number of shares in issue is adjusted to assume conversion of all dilutive potential ordinary shares. The Group’s only class of dilutive potential ordinary shares are those share options granted to employees where the exercise price is less than the average market price of the Company’s ordinary shares during the year. 2006 Based on operating profit based on longer-term investment returns Short-term fluctuations in investment returns on shareholder-backed business Shareholders’ share of actuarial and other gains and losses on defined benefit pension schemes Based on profit for the year 2005 Based on operating profit based on longer-term investment returns Adjustments arising from: Goodwill impairment charge Short-term fluctuations in investment returns on shareholder-backed business Shareholders’ share of actuarial and other gains and losses on defined benefit pension schemes Based on profit for the year from continuing operations Adjustment for post-tax results of discontinued operations Based on profit for the year Before tax (note B1) £m Tax (note F5) £m 893 (257) 162 167 1,222 (40) (50) (347) Net of tax Minority and minority interests interests £m £m Basic earnings per share Pence Diluted earnings per share Pence 1 (2) – (1) 637 26.4p 26.4p 120 117 874 5.0p 5.0p 4.8p 4.8p 36.2p 36.2p Before tax (note B1) £m Tax (note F5) £m Minority interests £m Net of tax and minority interests £m Basic earnings per share Pence Diluted earnings per share Pence 957 (186) (10) 761 32.2p 32.2p (120) 211 (50) 998 3 1,001 – (70) 15 (241) 0 (241) – (2) – (12) 0 (12) (120) (5.1)p (5.1)p 139 5.9p 5.9p (35) (1.5)p (1.5)p 745 3 748 31.5p 0.1p 31.6p 31.5p 0.1p 31.6p Number of shares A reconciliation of the weighted average number of ordinary shares used for calculating basic and diluted earnings per share is set out as below: Weighted average shares for calculation of basic earnings per share Shares under option at end of year Number of shares that would have been issued at fair value on assumed option exercise Weighted average shares for calculation of diluted earnings per share 2006 (millions) 2005 (millions) 2,413 10 (7) 2,416 2,365 13 (9) 2,369 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 127 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued B3: Dividends Dividends declared and paid in reporting period Parent company: Interim dividend (2006: 5.42p, 2005: 5.30p per share) Final dividend for prior period (2005: 11.02p, 2004: 10.65p per share) Subsidiary company payment to minority interests Total 2006 £m 2005 £m 131 267 1 399 126 252 2 380 2005 £m 126 267 393 As a result of shares issued in lieu of dividends of £76 million (2005: £52 million), dividends paid in cash, as set out in the consolidated cash flow statement, were £323 million (2005: £328 million). 2006 £m Parent company dividends relating to reporting period: Interim dividend (2006: 5.42p, 2005: 5.30p per share) Final dividend (2006: 11.72p, 2005: 11.02p per share) Total 131 287 418 A final dividend of 11.72 pence per share was proposed by the directors on 14 March 2007. Subject to shareholders’ approval, the dividend will be paid on 22 May 2007 to shareholders on the register at the close of business on 13 April 2007. The dividend will absorb an estimated £287 million of shareholders’ funds. A scrip dividend alternative will be offered to shareholders. B4: New business Insurance products and investment products* UK operations US operations Asian operations Group total Insurance products gross premiums Investment products gross inflows Total 2006 £m 7,192 5,981 1,921 2005 £m 7,193 5,023 1,485 2006 £m 2005 £m 2006 £m 13,486 – 20,408 7,916 – 18,457 20,678 5,981 22,329 2005 £m 15,109 5,023 19,942 15,094 13,701 33,894 26,373 48,988 40,074 128 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements B4: New business continued Insurance products – new business premiums and contributions* UK insurance operations Direct to customer Individual annuities Individual pensions and life Department of Work and Pensions rebate business Total Business to business Corporate pensions Individual annuities Bulk annuities Total Intermediated distribution Life Individual annuities Individual and corporate pensions Total Partnerships Life Individual and bulk annuities: Bulk annuity reinsurance from the Scottish Amicable Insurance Fund* Individual and other bulk annuities Total Europe Life Total UK insurance operations US operations Fixed annuities Fixed index annuities Variable annuities Life Guaranteed investment contracts GIC – Medium Term Notes Total US operations Asian operations China Hong Kong India (Group’s 26% interest) Indonesia Japan Korea Malaysia Singapore Taiwan Other Total Asian operations Group total Single Regular Annual premium and contribution equivalents 2006 £m 2005 £m 2006 £m 2005 £m 2006 £m 2005 £m 816 60 161 1,037 536 264 85 885 961 919 130 2,010 720 29 244 993 242 212 511 965 1,112 995 108 2,215 840 814 560 1,500 2,900 – 1,814 2,628 159 201 – 9 – 9 162 – – 162 5 – 22 27 3 – – 3 – – 11 – 11 146 – – 146 6 – 25 31 3 – – 3 – 6,991 7,002 201 191 688 554 3,819 8 458 437 5,964 27 355 20 31 68 103 4 357 92 15 1,072 788 616 2,605 11 355 634 5,009 17 289 4 42 30 29 9 284 124 9 837 – – – 17 – – 17 36 103 105 71 7 208 72 72 139 36 849 14,027 12,848 1,067 – – – 14 – – 14 23 83 57 42 4 132 66 58 150 33 648 853 82 15 16 113 216 26 8 250 101 92 35 228 87 56 150 293 16 900 69 55 382 18 46 44 614 39 139 107 74 14 218 72 108 148 37 956 72 14 24 110 170 21 51 242 118 100 36 254 84 – 182 266 20 892 79 62 261 15 35 63 515 25 112 57 46 7 135 67 86 162 34 731 2,470 2,138 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 129 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued B4: New business continued Investment products – funds under management* 2006 UK operations Asian operations Group total 2005 UK operations Asian operations Group total 1 Jan 2006 £m 36,196 10,132 Gross inflows £m Market and other Redemptions £m movements 31 Dec 2006 £m £m 13,486 20,408 (7,385) (17,876) 44,946 2,649 (411) 12,253 46,328 33,894 (25,261) 2,238 57,199 1 Jan 2005 £m 28,705 8,538 Gross inflows £m Redemptions £m 7,916 18,457 (4,054) (17,130) 37,243 26,373 (21,184) Market and other movements £m 3,629 267 3,896 31 Dec 2005 £m 36,196 10,132 46,328 *The format of the tables shown above is consistent with the distinction between insurance and investment products as applied for previous financial reporting periods. With the exception of some US institutional business, products categorised as ‘insurance’ refer to those classified as contracts of long-term insurance business for regulatory reporting purposes, i.e. falling within one of the classes of insurance specified in part II of Schedule 1 to the Regulated Activities Order under FSA regulations. Annual premium and contribution equivalents are calculated as the aggregate of regular new business amounts and one-tenth of single new business amounts. The tables shown above are provided as an indicative volume measure of transactions undertaken in the reporting period that have the potential to generate profits for shareholders. The amounts shown are not, and not intended to be, reflective of premium income recorded in the IFRS income statement. The tables above include a bulk annuity transaction with the Scottish Amicable Insurance Fund (SAIF) with a premium of £560 million. The transaction reflects the arrangement entered into in June 2006 for the reinsurance of non-profit immediate pension annuity liabilities of SAIF to Prudential Retirement Income Limited (PRIL), a shareholder-owned subsidiary of the Group. SAIF is a closed ring-fenced sub-fund of the PAC long-term fund established by a Court approved Scheme of Arrangement in October 1997, which is solely for the benefit of SAIF policyholders. Shareholders have no interest in the profits of this fund, although they are entitled to investment management fees on this business. The inclusion of the transaction between SAIF and PRIL as new business in the tables reflects the transfer from SAIF to Prudential shareholders’ funds of longevity risk, the requirement to set aside supporting capital, and entitlement to surpluses arising on this block of business from the reinsurance arrangement. For Group reporting purposes the amounts recorded by SAIF and PRIL for the premium are eliminated on consolidation. The details shown above for insurance products include contributions for contracts that are classified under IFRS 4 ‘Insurance Contracts’ as not containing significant insurance risk. These products are described as investment contracts or other financial instruments under IFRS. Contracts included in this category are primarily certain unit-linked and similar contracts written in UK insurance operations and Guaranteed Investment Contracts and similar funding agreements written in US operations. New business premiums for regular premium products are shown on an annualised basis. Department of Work and Pensions rebate business is classified as single recurrent business. Internal vesting business is classified as new business where the contracts include an open market option. UK and Asian investment products referred to in the table for funds under management above are unit trust, mutual funds and similar types of retail fund management arrangements. These are unrelated to insurance products that are classified as ‘investment contracts’ under IFRS 4, as described in the preceding paragraph, although similar IFRS recognition and measurement principles apply to the acquisition costs and fees attaching to this type of business. US investment products are no longer included in the table above as they are assets under administration rather than funds under management. In previous periods new business premiums for intermediated distribution of UK insurance operations have included Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) rebate business for SAIF. As shareholders have no interest in SAIF, these are now excluded from the table above with comparatives restated accordingly. The amounts of new SAIF DWP rebate business written were £60 million for 2006, and £83 million for 2005. 130 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements B5: Group balance sheet The Group’s primary reporting segments are long-term business, banking, and broker-dealer and fund management. The Group’s secondary reporting segments are geographical namely the UK, the US, and Asia. Details of disclosures in accordance with the requirements of IAS 14 for segment assets and liabilities are shown below. Details of the primary reporting segments are as follows: Long-term business This segment comprises long-term products that contain both a significant and insignificant element of insurance risk. The products are managed together and not classified in this way other than for accounting purposes. This segment also includes activity of the PAC with- profits funds’ venture investments managed by PPM Capital and other investment subsidiaries held for the purpose of supporting the Group’s long-term business operations. Banking This segment consists of products provided by the Group’s online banking subsidiary, Egg. The nature of these products and the managing of the business differ from the risks inherent in the other business segments, and the regulatory environment of the banking industry differs from that of the other business segments. Note I8 includes details of the agreement in January 2007 to sell Egg Banking plc. Broker-dealer and fund management The investment management segment is comprised of both internal and third-party asset management services, inclusive of portfolio and mutual fund management, where the Group acts as an advisor, and broker-dealer activities. The nature of the products and the managing of the business differ from the risks inherent in the other business segments, and the regulatory environment of the investment management industry differs from that of the other business segments. Broker-dealer 2006 Consolidated total assets Consolidated total liabilities Segment assets by geographical segment UK US Asia Intra-group eliminations Total assets per balance sheet 2005 Consolidated total assets Consolidated total liabilities Segment assets by geographical segment UK US Asia Intra-group eliminations Total assets per balance sheet Long-term business £m Banking management £m and fund Unallocated to a segment £m £m Intra-group eliminations £m Total £m 201,937 9,498 5,564 3,672 (4,151) 216,520 (196,651) (9,206) (3,922) (5,272) 4,151 (210,900) 165,103 39,695 15,873 (4,151) 216,520 Long-term business £m Broker-dealer and fund Banking management £m £m Unallocated to a segment £m Intra-group eliminations £m Total £m 192,944 10,752 3,208 2,768 (2,236) 207,436 (187,662) (10,374) (1,597) (4,673) 2,236 (202,070) 154,900 41,700 13,072 (2,236) 207,436 To explain more comprehensively the assets, liabilities and capital of the Group’s businesses it is appropriate to provide an analysis of the Group’s balance sheet by a mixture of primary and secondary segments. This analysis is shown below for the Group balance sheet at 31 December 2006. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 131 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V B5: Group balance sheet continued Assets Intangible assets attributable to shareholders: Goodwill Deferred acquisition costs and acquired in-force value of long-term business contracts Total Intangible assets attributable to PAC with-profits fund: In respect of acquired venture fund investment subsidiaries Deferred acquisition costs UK insurance operations (note D2) £m M&G £m Egg (note E) £m Total UK operations £m US operations (note D3) £m Asian operations (note D4) £m Unallocated to a segment £m Intra-group eliminations £m Group total £m – 1,153 167 167 6 1,159 830 31 861 – – – – – – – – – – 1,153 16 172 173 1,326 1,712 1,728 612 784 830 31 861 – – – – – – 2,187 1,728 784 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 1,341 2,497 3,838 830 31 861 4,699 Total (notes H1 and H2) 1,028 1,159 Other non-investment and non-cash assets (notes G1 and H3 to H6) Investments of long-term business, banking and other operations (notes G1,H7 and H8) Held for sale assets (note H9) Cash and cash equivalents (note H10) 4,733 278 342 5,353 1,671 656 2,917 (4,151) 6,446 138,537 463 1,979 2,904 – 852 8,247 – 909 149,688 463 3,740 36,164 – 132 13,749 – 684 240 – 515 – – – 199,841 463 5,071 Total assets 146,740 5,193 9,498 161,431 39,695 15,873 3,672 (4,151) 216,520 132 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements B5: Group balance sheet continued UK insurance operations (note D2) £m M&G £m Egg (note E) £m Total UK operations £m US operations (note D3) £m Asian operations (note D4) £m Unallocated to a segment £m Intra-group eliminations £m Group total £m Equity and liabilities Equity Shareholders’ equity (note H11) Minority interests Total equity Liabilities Banking customer accounts (note G1) Policyholder liabilities and unallocated 1,263 79 1,342 – surplus of with-profits funds: Insurance contract liabilities (note H12) 80,323 Investment contract liabilities with discretionary participation features (note G1) Investment contract liabilities without discretionary participation features (note G1) Unallocated surplus of with-profits funds (reflecting application of ‘realistic’ basis provisions for UK regulated with-profits funds (notes D2(d)(ii) and H12) Total policyholder liabilities and unallocated surplus of with-profits funds Core structural borrowings of shareholder-financed operations (note H13): Subordinated debt (other than Egg) Other Egg subordinated debt (note H13) Total Operational borrowings attributable to shareholder-financed operations (notes G1 and H13) Borrowings attributable to with-profits funds (notes G1 and H13) Other non-insurance liabilities (notes G1, H4, H9, H14 and H15) Total liabilities 28,665 11,453 13,511 133,952 – – – – – 11 1,776 1,383 52 1,435 292 – 292 2,938 131 3,069 2,713 1 2,714 1,437 – 1,437 (1,600) – (1,600) – – – – – – – – – – – 4 – 5,554 5,554 – – – – – 80,323 30,184 12,706 28,665 – 11,453 1,562 68 27 – 13,511 – 88 – 133,952 31,746 12,889 – – – – – – – – – 451 451 – – – 451 451 – 127 127 – 127 2,819 2,834 743 – 1,776 – – – – – – – – 1,538 947 2,485 – 2,485 2,032 – – – – – 5,488 132 5,620 5,554 – 123,213 – – 28,733 13,042 – 13,599 – 178,587 – – – – – – – 1,538 1,074 2,612 451 3,063 5,609 1,776 9,659 145,398 3,754 3,758 382 13,795 4,365 1,547 755 (4,151) 16,311 9,206 158,362 36,981 14,436 5,272 (4,151) 210,900 Total equity and liabilities 146,740 5,193 9,498 161,431 39,695 15,873 3,672 (4,151) 216,520 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 133 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued B5: Group balance sheet continued This analysis is shown below for the Group balance sheet at 31 December 2005. UK insurance operations (note D2) £m M&G £m Egg (note E) £m Total UK operations £m US operations (note D3) £m Asian operations (note D4) £m Unallocated to a segment £m Intra-group eliminations £m Group total £m Assets Intangible assets attributable to shareholders: Goodwill Deferred acquisition costs and acquired in-force value of long-term contracts Total Intangible assets attributable to PAC with-profits fund: In respect of acquired venture fund investment subsidiaries Deferred acquisition costs Total Total (notes H1 and H2) Other non-investment and non-cash assets (notes G1 and H3 to H6) Investments of long-term business, banking and other operations (notes G1, H7 and H8) Held for sale assets (note H9) Cash and cash equivalents (note H10) – 1,153 199 199 6 1,159 679 35 714 913 – – – 1,159 – – – – – – – 1,153 16 172 205 1,358 1,634 1,650 566 738 679 35 714 – – – – – – 2,072 1,650 738 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 1,341 2,405 3,746 679 35 714 4,460 4,457 256 280 4,993 1,888 566 1,059 (2,236) 6,270 131,263 728 1,195 1,383 – 26 9,747 – 725 142,393 728 1,946 37,960 – 202 11,264 – 504 775 – 934 – – – 192,392 728 3,586 Total assets 138,556 2,824 10,752 152,132 41,700 13,072 2,768 (2,236) 207,436 134 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements B5: Group balance sheet continued UK insurance operations (note D2) £m M&G £m Egg (note E) £m Total UK operations £m US operations (note D3) £m Asian operations (note D4) £m Unallocated to a segment £m Intra-group eliminations £m Group total £m P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s Equity and liabilities Equity Shareholders’ equity (note H11) Minority interests Total equity Liabilities Banking customer accounts (note G1) Policyholder liabilities and unallocated surplus of with-profits funds: Insurance contract liabilities (note H12) Investment contract liabilities with discretionary participation features (note G1) Investment contract liabilities without discretionary participation features (note G1) Unallocated surplus of with-profits funds (reflecting application of ‘realistic’ basis provisions for UK regulated with-profits funds (notes D2(d)(ii) and H12) Total policyholder liabilities and 1,141 95 1,236 – 79,231 26,443 10,502 11,245 unallocated surplus of with-profits funds 127,421 Core structural borrowings of shareholder-financed operations (note H13): Subordinated debt (other than Egg) Other Egg subordinated debt (note H13) Total Operational borrowings attributable to shareholder-financed operations (notes G1 and H13) Borrowings attributable to with-profits funds (notes G1 and H13) Other non-insurance liabilities (notes G1, H4, H9, H14 and H15) Total liabilities – – – – – 17 1,898 1,398 – 1,398 303 75 378 2,842 170 3,012 2,969 2 2,971 1,288 – 1,288 (1,905) – (1,905) – – – – – – – – – – – 2 – 5,830 5,830 – – – – – 79,231 30,479 10,726 26,443 – 10,502 1,502 80 22 – 11,245 – 85 – 127,421 31,981 10,913 – – – – – – – – – 451 451 – – – 451 451 – 145 145 – 145 3,856 3,875 1,085 – 1,898 – – – – – – – – 1,646 948 2,594 – 2,594 1,472 – 7,984 137,320 1,424 1,426 237 9,645 5,518 871 607 (2,236) 14,405 10,374 149,120 38,729 11,784 4,673 (2,236) 202,070 Total equity and liabilities 138,556 2,824 10,752 152,132 41,700 13,072 2,768 (2,236) 207,436 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 135 A B C – – – – 5,194 172 5,366 5,830 – 120,436 – – 26,523 D 12,026 – 11,330 – 170,315 – – – – – – – 1,646 1,093 2,739 451 3,190 6,432 1,898 E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued C: Group risk management (i) Overview A significant part of the Group’s business involves the acceptance and management of risk. The Group’s risk management model requires the primary responsibility for risk management at an operational level to rest with business unit chief executives. The second line of defence of risk comprises oversight functions reporting to the Group Chief Executive together with business unit risk functions and risk management committees. The third line of defence comprises independent assurance from Internal Audit reporting to business unit and Group audit committees. The Group Risk Framework requires that all of the Group’s businesses and functions establish processes for identifying, evaluating and managing the key risks faced by the Group. The risk management of the Group has been given additional focus by the creation in 2005 of a new role of Group Chief Risk Officer (CRO). The CRO oversees all aspects of the Group’s risk management, including Financial Risk, Operational Risk, Compliance, and for management purposes, Internal Audit. Additional information on the Group’s risk framework, including the Group and business unit level risk committees, is included in the risk management section of the Group’s operating and financial review. As a provider of financial services, including insurance, the Group’s business is the managed acceptance of risk. The system of internal control is an essential and integral part of the risk management process. As part of the annual preparation of its business plan, all of the Group’s businesses and functions are required to carry out a review of risks. This involves an assessment of the impact and likelihood of key risks and of the effectiveness of the controls in place to manage them. The assessment is reviewed regularly throughout the year. In addition, business units evaluate opportunities and risks against business objectives regularly with the Group Chief Executive, Group Finance Director and the Group Chief Risk Officer. Businesses are required to confirm annually that they have undertaken risk management during the year as required by the Group Risk Framework, and that they have reviewed the effectiveness of the system of internal control. The results of these reviews are reported to the Audit Committee together with confirmation that the processes described above as required by the Group Risk Framework were in place throughout the period covered by the report. The businesses also confirm that they complied with Internal Control: Guidance on the Combined Code (the Turnbull guidance). In addition, Internal Audit executes a comprehensive risk-based audit plan throughout the Group, with all significant issues arising from the audit reported to the Group Audit Committee. The Group’s internal control framework includes detailed procedures set out in financial and actuarial procedure manuals. The Group prepares an annual business plan with three-year projections. Executive management and the Board receive monthly reports on the Group’s actual performance against plan, together with updated forecasts. The insurance operations of the Group all prepare a financial condition report which is presented to the Board, together with regular reports from the Group Finance Director on the financial position of the Group. (ii) Major risks The Group publishes separately within its Group Annual Report a section on key risk factors, which discusses inherent risks in the business and trading environment. (iii) Financial risks (a) Foreign exchange risk Prudential faces foreign exchange risk, primarily because its presentation currency is pounds sterling, whereas approximately 67 per cent of Prudential’s operating profit from continuing operations based on longer-term investment returns, as described in note B1, for the year ended 31 December 2006, came from Prudential’s US and Asian operations. The exposure relating to the translation of reported earnings is not separately managed although its impact is reduced by interest payments on foreign currency borrowings and by the adoption of average exchange rates for the translation of foreign currency revenues. Approximately 76 per cent of the Group’s IFRS basis shareholders’ funds at 31 December 2006 arose in Prudential’s US and Asian operations. To mitigate the exposure of the US component there are US$1.55 billion of borrowings held centrally. The Group has also entered into a US$2 billion net investment hedge (see note G3). Net of the currency position arising from these instruments some 43 per cent of the Group’s shareholders’ funds are represented by net assets in currencies other than sterling. (b) Liquidity risk Liquidity risk is the risk that Prudential may be unable to meet payment of obligations in a timely manner at a reasonable cost or the risk of unexpected increases in the cost of funding at appropriate maturities or rates. Liquidity management in each business seeks to ensure that, even under adverse conditions, Prudential has access to the funds necessary to cover surrenders, withdrawals and maturing liabilities. In practice, most of Prudential’s invested assets are marketable securities. This, combined with the fact that a large proportion of the liabilities contain discretionary surrender values or surrender charges, reduces the liquidity risk. The Group maintains committed borrowing and securities lending facilities. 136 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements (c) Credit risk Credit risk is the risk that a counterparty or an issuer of securities, which Prudential holds in its asset portfolio, defaults or another party fails to perform according to the terms of the contract. Some of Prudential’s businesses, in particular Jackson, Egg, the PAC with-profits fund and Prudential’s UK pension annuity business, hold large amounts of interest-sensitive investments that contain credit risk on which a certain level of defaults is expected. These expected losses are considered when Prudential determines the crediting rates, deposit rates and premium rates for the products that will be supported by these assets. The key shareholder businesses exposed to credit risks are Jackson and Egg. Certain over-the-counter derivatives contain a credit risk element that is controlled through evaluation of collateral agreements and master netting agreements on interest rate and currency swaps. Prudential is also exposed to credit-related losses in the event of non-performance by counterparties. Further analysis of the credit risks for Jackson is shown in note D3 and for Egg in note E7. (iv) Operational, compliance and fiscal risk Operational risk can result from a variety of factors, including failure to obtain proper internal authorisations or maintain internal controls, failure to document transactions properly, failure of operational and information security procedures or other procedural failures, computer system or software failures, other equipment failures, fraud, inadequate training or errors by employees. Compliance with internal rules and procedures designed to manage these risks is monitored by Prudential’s local management boards. Internal compliance managers who report to the local management boards monitor adherence to local regulatory requirements. The head of Prudential’s Group Compliance function reports directly to the Group Chief Risk Officer who submits regular reports to the Board of Directors. Compliance risk includes the possibility that transactions may not be enforceable under applicable law or regulation as well as the cost of rectification and fines, and also the possibility that changes in law or regulation could adversely affect Prudential’s position. Prudential seeks to minimise compliance risk by seeking to ensure that transactions are properly authorised and by submitting new or unusual transactions to legal advisers for review. Prudential is exposed to certain fiscal risks arising from changes in tax laws and enforcement policies and in reviews by taxation authorities of tax positions taken by Prudential in recent years. Prudential manages this risk and risks associated with changes in other legislation and regulation through ongoing review by relevant departments of proposed changes to legislation and by membership of relevant trade and professional committees involved in commenting on draft proposals in these areas. (v) Market risk Market risk is the risk that future changes in market prices may make a financial instrument less valuable. The primary market risks Prudential faces are equity risk and interest rate risk because most of its assets are investments that are either equity type investments and subject to equity price risk, or bonds, mortgages or cash deposits, the values of which are subject to interest rate risk. The amount of risk borne by Prudential’s shareholders depends on the extent to which its customers share the investment risk through the structure of Prudential’s products. The split of Prudential’s investments between equity investments and interest-sensitive instruments depends principally on the type of liabilities supported by those investments and the amount of capital Prudential has available. This mix of liabilities allows Prudential to invest a substantial portion of its investment funds in equity and property investments that Prudential believes produce greater returns over the long term. On the other hand Prudential has some liabilities that contain guaranteed returns and allow instant access (for example, interest-sensitive fixed annuities, immediate annuities and fixed rate customer bank deposits), which generally will be supported by fixed income investments. To reduce investment, interest rate and foreign exchange exposures, and to facilitate efficient investment management, Prudential uses derivative instruments. Prudential’s policy is that cash or corresponding assets cover amounts at risk through derivative contracts. (vi) Asset/liability management Prudential manages its assets and liabilities locally, in accordance with local regulatory requirements and reflecting the differing types of liabilities Prudential has in each business. As a result of the diversity of products offered by Prudential and the different regulatory environments in which it operates, Prudential employs different methods of asset/liability management, on both an in-force and new business basis. Stochastic modelling of assets and liabilities is undertaken in the Group’s insurance operations to assess economic capital requirements for different confidence intervals and time horizons. In addition, reserve adequacy testing under a range of scenarios and dynamic solvency analysis is carried out, including under certain scenarios mandated by the US, the UK and Asian regulators. A stochastic approach models the inter-relationship between asset and liability movements, taking into account asset correlation and policyholder behaviour, under a large number of possible scenarios. These scenarios are projected forward over a period of time, typically 25 years or longer, and the liabilities and solvency position of the fund are calculated in each scenario in each future year. This allows the identification of which extreme scenarios will have the most adverse effects and what the best estimate outcome may be. The fund’s policy on management actions, including bonus and investment policy, are then set in order that they are consistent with the available capital and the targeted risk of default. This differs from a deterministic model, which would only consider the results from one carefully selected scenario. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 137 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued C: Group risk management continued For businesses that are most sensitive to interest rate changes, such as immediate annuity business, Prudential uses cash flow analysis to create a portfolio of fixed income securities whose value changes in line with the value of liabilities when interest rates change. This type of analysis helps protect profits from changing interest rates. In the UK, the cash flow analysis is used in Prudential’s annuity and banking business while, in the US, it is used for its interest-sensitive and fixed index annuities and stable value products such as Guaranteed Investments Contracts (GICs). Perfect matching is not possible for interest-sensitive and fixed index annuities because of the nature of the liabilities (which include guaranteed surrender values) and options for prepayment contained in the assets. The US supervisory authorities require Jackson to calculate projections to test Jackson’s ability to run off its liabilities with assets equal to statutory reserves in a number of specified future economic scenarios. If Jackson is unable to satisfy all of these tests, which are carried out at least annually, then it may be required to establish additional statutory reserves. For businesses that are most sensitive to equity price changes, Prudential uses stochastic modelling and scenario testing to look at the expected future returns on its investments under different scenarios that best reflect the large diversity in returns that equities can produce. This allows Prudential to devise an investment and with-profits policyholder bonus strategy that, on the model assumptions, allows it to optimise returns to its policyholders and shareholders over time, while maintaining appropriate financial strength. Prudential uses this method extensively in connection with its UK with-profits business. When presenting regulatory returns to the UK supervisory authorities, the calculation of the statutory liabilities for solvency purposes on the FSA’s Peak 1 basis is required to incorporate a ‘resilience’ reserve that is sufficient to ensure that assets equal to the statutory reserves (including the resilience reserve) remain equal to statutory reserves in the event of certain prescribed changes in equity and real estate prices combined with prescribed rises and falls in interest yields. All of Prudential’s investments are held either for risk management or investment purposes. This is because almost all of the investments support policyholder or customer liabilities of one form or another. Any assets that Prudential holds centrally that are not supporting customer liabilities are predominantly invested in short-term fixed income and fixed maturity securities. (vii) Use of derivatives In the UK and Asia, Prudential uses derivatives to reduce equity risk, interest rate and currency exposures, and to facilitate efficient investment management. In the US, Prudential uses derivatives to reduce interest rate risk, to facilitate efficient portfolio management and to match liabilities under fixed index annuities policies. Details of the Group’s use of derivatives are explained in note G3. It is Prudential’s policy that cash or corresponding assets cover amounts at risk through derivative transactions. Derivative financial instruments used to facilitate efficient portfolio management and for investment purposes are carried at fair value with changes in fair value included in long-term investment returns. 138 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements D: Life assurance business D1: Group overview (a) Products and classification for IFRS reporting The measurement basis of assets and liabilities of long-term business contracts is dependent upon the classification of the contracts under IFRS. Under IFRS 4, contracts are initially classified as being either ‘insurance’ contracts, if the level of insurance risk in the contracts is significant, or investment contracts, if the risk is insignificant. Insurance contracts Insurance contracts are permitted to be accounted for under previously applied GAAP. The Group has chosen to adopt this approach. However, as an improvement to accounting policy, permitted by IFRS 4, the Group has applied the measurement principles for with-profits contracts of UK regulated entities and disclosures of the UK Standard FRS 27 from 1 January 2005. An explanation of the provisions under FRS 27 is provided in note D2. Under the previously applied GAAP, UK GAAP, the assets and liabilities of contracts are reported in accordance with the MSB of reporting as set out in the ABI SORP. The insurance contracts of the Group’s shareholder-backed business fall broadly into the following categories: • UK insurance operations – bulk and individual annuity business, written primarily by Prudential Retirement Income Limited, Prudential Pensions Limited, and other categories of non-participating UK business; • Jackson – fixed and variable annuity business and life insurance; and • Prudential Corporation Asia – non-participating term, whole life, and unit-linked policies, together with accident and health policies. Investment contracts Investment contracts are further delineated under IFRS 4 between those with and without discretionary participation features. For those contracts with discretionary participation features, IFRS 4 also permits the continued application of previously applied GAAP. The Group has adopted this approach, again subject to the FRS 27 improvement. For investment contracts that do not contain discretionary participation features, IAS 39 and, where the contract includes an investment management element, IAS 18, apply measurement principles to assets and liabilities attaching to the contract that may diverge from those previously applied. Contracts of the Group, which are classified as investment contracts that do not contain discretionary participation features, whose assets and liabilities were required to be remeasured from 1 January 2005 under these two standards can be summarised as: • UK – certain unit-linked savings and similar contracts; • Jackson – GICs and funding agreements – minor amounts of ‘annuity certain’ contracts; and • Prudential Corporation Asia – minor amounts for a number of small categories of business. The accounting for the contracts of UK insurance operations and Jackson’s GICs and funding agreements are considered in turn below: (i) Certain UK unit-linked savings and similar contracts Deferred acquisition costs Acquisition costs are deferred to the extent that it is appropriate to recognise an asset that represents the entity’s contractual right to benefit from providing investment management services and are amortised as the entity recognises the related revenue. IAS 18 further reduces the costs potentially capable of deferral to incremental costs only. Deferred acquisition costs are amortised to the income statement in line with service provision. Deferred income reserves These are required to be established under IAS 18 with amortisation over the expected life of the contract. The majority of the relevant UK contracts are single premium with the initial deferred income reflecting the ‘front-end load’ i.e. the difference between the premium paid and the amount credited to the unit fund. Deferred income is amortised to the income statement in line with service provision. The amortisation profile is either on a straight-line basis or, if more appropriate, a further deferral of income recognition is applied. Sterling reserves Prudent provisions established for possible future expenses not covered by future margins at a policy level reflecting the regulatory approach in the UK are not permitted under IFRS 4. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 139 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued D1: Group overview continued (ii) Jackson – GICs and funding arrangments Under a traditional GIC, the policyholder makes a lump sum deposit. The interest rate paid is fixed and established when the contract is issued. Funding agreements are of a similar nature but the interest rate may be floating, based on a rate linked to an external index. The US GAAP accounting requirements for such contracts are very similar to those under IFRS on the amortised cost model for liability measurement. (b) Concentration of risk (i) Business accepted The Group has a broadly based exposure to life assurance risk. This is achieved through the geographical spread of the Group’s operations and, within those operations, through a broad mix of product types. In addition, looking beyond pure insurance risk, the Group considers itself well developed in its approach to assessment of diversification benefits through its economic capital framework that is used for internal business management. The economic capital methodology seeks to apply a single yardstick to assess and quantify all risks attaching to the Group’s insurance business and associated capital requirements. Prudential’s internal Group economic capital requirement is defined as the minimum amount of capital that the Group needs to hold in order to remain economically solvent over a 25-year horizon, given a target probability of insolvency appropriate for AA-rated debt. The target confidence level is based on historic default rates for AA-rated debt, and varies over the time horizon of the projection. The economic capital requirement is calculated in respect of existing contractual and discretionary liabilities only. For the purposes of calculating Group economic capital, Group economic solvency is defined as the position where both: (a) the capital balance of the parent company is positive, and (b) all business units are solvent on the applicable local regulatory basis. This definition of solvency allows the Group’s capital position to be assessed on an economic basis while taking into account the actual regulatory constraints at the business unit level. The Group economic capital position is calculated using the Group Solvency Model (GSM) – an integrated stochastic asset/liability model of the Group economic solvency position. Projected economic scenarios in the GSM are generated using a stochastic economic scenario generator that captures all the correlations between different asset classes and geographies. The Group regularly determines the level of capital required to cover the risks to its existing contractual and discretionary insurance liabilities on an economic basis and its internal target solvency level. This level of required capital is determined after allowance for diversification across risk and geographies and the capturing of future shareholders’ transfers from the business units. This level is then compared with available capital on an equivalent basis (i.e. GAAP based shareholders’ equity after eliminating goodwill and including subordinated debt capital and valuation differences). The required capital is then analysed into its contributing parts by risk type namely asset/liability matching, credit risk, underwriting, persistency and operational risk. The largest risk exposure on a diversified basis, credit risk, reflects the relative size of the exposure to Jackson, Prudential UK shareholder annuities business, and Egg. An example of the diversification benefits for Prudential is that adverse scenarios do not affect all business units in the same way, providing natural hedges within the Group. For example, the Group’s US business is sensitive towards increasing interest rates, whereas, in contrast, several business units in Asia benefit from increasing rates. Conversely, these Asian business units are sensitive towards low interest rates, whereas the US benefits from falling interest rates. The economic capital framework also takes into account situations where factors are correlated, for example the extent of correlation between Asian and US economies. (ii) Ceded business The Group cedes certain business to other insurance companies. Although the ceding of insurance does not relieve the Group of liability to its policyholders, the Group participates in such agreements for the purpose of managing its loss exposure. The Group evaluates the financial condition of its reinsurers and monitors concentration of credit risk from similar geographic regions, activities or economic characteristics of the reinsurers to minimise its exposure from reinsurer insolvencies. There are no significant concentrations of reinsurance risk. (c) Guarantees Notes D2(b), D3(b), D4(b) and D4(h) provide details of guarantee features of the Group’s life assurance products. In the UK, guarantees of the with-profits products are valued for accounting purposes on a market consistent basis for 2006 as described in section D2(d)(ii). The UK business also has products with guaranteed annuity option features, mostly within SAIF, as described in section D2(b). There is little exposure to financial options and guarantees in the shareholder-backed business of the UK operations. The US business annuity products have a variety of option and guarantee features as described in section D3(b). Jackson’s derivative programme seeks to manage the exposures as described in section D3(c). The most significant exposure for the Group arises on Taiwan whole of life policies as described in section D4(h). 140 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements D1: Group overview continued (d) Amount, timing and uncertainty of future cash flows from insurance contracts The factors that affect the amount, timing and uncertainty of future cash flows from insurance contracts depend upon the businesses concerned as described in subsequent sections. In general terms, the Group is managed by reference to a combination of measures. These measures include IFRS basis earnings, net shareholder cash flow to or from business units from or to central funds, and movements in the present value of future expected distributable earnings of in-force long-term insurance business. The latter item when added to the net assets is commonly referred to as Embedded Value. The Group prepares and publishes supplementary information in accordance with the European Embedded Value (EEV) principles issued by the CFO Forum of European Insurance Companies in May 2004 and expanded by the addition of Additional Guidance on EEV Disclosures published in October 2005. Key elements of the EEV principles are the approach applied to allowing for risk and the use of best estimate assumptions to project future cash flows arising from the contracts. The business covered by the EEV basis results includes both investment contracts as well as insurance contracts (as defined under IFRS 4). Investment contracts form a relatively small part of the Group’s long-term business as demonstrated by the carrying value of policyholder liabilities shown in the Group balance sheet. The projected cash flows are those expected to arise under the contracts such as those arising from premiums, claims and expenses after appropriate allowance for future lapse behaviour and mortality and morbidity experience. The cash flows also include the expected future cash flows on assets covering liabilities and encumbered capital. Encumbered capital is based on the Group’s internal target for economic capital subject to it meeting at least the local statutory minimum requirements. Economic capital is assessed using internal models but does not take credit for the significant diversification benefits that exist within the Group. The valuation of the future cash flows also takes account of the ‘time value’ of option and guarantee features of the Group’s long-term business contracts. The time value reflects the variability of economic outcomes in the future. Where appropriate, a full stochastic valuation is undertaken to determine the value of the in-force business. Common principles are adopted across the Group for the stochastic asset model classes, for example, separate modelling of individual asset classes but with allowance for correlation between the various asset classes. In deriving the time value of financial options and guarantees, management actions in response to emerging investment and fund solvency conditions are modelled. In all instances, the modelled actions are in accordance with approved local practice and therefore reflect the options actually available to management. For the PAC with-profits sub-fund, the actions are consistent with those set out in the Principles and Practices of Financial Management. The present value of the future distributable earnings is calculated using a risk discount rate which reflects both the time value of money and the risks associated with the cash flows that are not otherwise allowed for. The risk allowance covers market and non-market risks. Under Capital Asset Pricing Methodology (CAPM), the discount rate is determined as the aggregate of the risk-free rate and the risk margin for market risk. The latter is calculated as the ‘beta’ times the equity risk premium. Under CAPM, the beta of a portfolio or product measures its relative market risk. The risk discount rates reflect the market risk inherent in each product group and hence the volatility of product cash flows. They are determined by considering how the profits from each product are impacted by changes in expected returns on various asset classes, and by converting this into a relative rate of return, it is possible to derive a product specific beta. Product specific discount rates are used in order to reflect the risk profile of each major territory and product group. No allowance is required for non-market risks where these are assumed to be fully diversifiable. The majority of non-market risks are considered to be diversifiable. Finance theory cannot be used to determine the appropriate component of beta for non-diversifiable non-market risks since there is no observable risk premium associated with it that is akin to the equity risk premium. Recognising this, a pragmatic approach has been used. A constant margin of 50 basis points (2005: 50 basis points) has been added to the risk margin derived for market risk to cover the non-diversifiable non-market risks associated with the business. For the UK shareholder-backed annuity business an additional margin of 100 basis points was used (2005: 100 basis points). Product level betas are calculated each year. They are combined with the most recent product mix to produce appropriate betas and risk discount rates for each major product grouping. Details of the key assumptions and sensitivity of the EEV value of in-force business are shown in the sections for each geographic segment that follow in this note. The sensitivity of the present value of the discounted future cash flows under the EEV methodology is of particular interest. The sensitivity provides an indication of the movement in the net value ascribable to potential variations in the amounts and timing of future cash flows to shareholders and the uncertainty attached to those cash flows. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 141 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued D1: Group overview continued (e) Sensitivity of IFRS basis profit or loss and equity to changes that have a material effect The factors that may significantly affect IFRS results due to changes of experience or assumptions vary significantly between business units. The most significant items are summarised below. UK insurance operations • With-profits business – investment performance subject to smoothing through declared bonuses; • unit-linked business – investment performance through fund management fees; and • annuity business – mortality experience and assumptions and credit risk. Jackson • Variable annuity business – fund management performance and incidence of guarantee features of the contracts; • fixed annuity business – spread differential between earned rate and rate credited to policyholder; and • fixed indexed annuity business – spread differential between earned rate and rate credited to policyholder and incidence of equity index participation features. Asian operations • With-profits business – as for UK insurance operations; • unit-linked business – as for UK insurance operations; and • non-participating business – return on assets covering the Taiwan whole of life policies. Where appropriate these issues are discussed in notes D2, D3 and D4. Lapse risk is not mentioned above and has variable impacts. In the UK, adverse persistency experience has led to losses in embedded value in 2005 and to a much lesser extent in 2006 reflecting a reduced level of projected statutory transfers from the PAC with-profits sub- fund. However, in any given year, the statutory transfer recognised in IFRS profits is only marginally affected by altered persistency trends. Jackson is sensitive to lapse risk. However, Jackson has swaption derivatives in place to ameliorate the effect of a sharp rise in interest rates, which would be the most likely cause of a sudden change in policyholder behaviour. (f) Duration of liabilities Under the terms of the Group’s contracts, as for life assurance contracts generally, the contractual maturity date is the earlier of the end of the contract term, death, other insurable events or surrender. The Group has therefore chosen to provide details of liability duration that reflect the actuarially determined best estimate of the likely incidence of these factors on contract duration. Details are shown in sections D2(i), D3(i) and D4(i). Effective interest rates, as defined in IAS 32, are not applicable to the Group’s insurance contracts and investment contracts with discretionary participation features. In the years 2002 to 2006, claims paid on the Group’s life assurance contracts including those now classified as investment contracts under IFRS 4 ranged from £11.8 billion to £15.9 billion. Indicatively it is to be expected that of the Group’s policyholder liabilities (excluding unallocated surplus) at 31 December 2006 of £165 billion, the amounts likely to be paid in 2007 will be of a similar magnitude. 142 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements D2: UK insurance operations (a) Summary balance sheet at 31 December 2006 In order to explain the different types of UK business and fund structure, the balance sheet of the UK insurance operations may be analysed by the assets and liabilities of the Scottish Amicable Insurance Fund, the PAC with-profits sub-fund, PRIL, unit-linked and other business. The assets and liabilities of these funds and subsidiaries are shown in the table below. PAC with-profits sub-fund (note i) Other funds and subsidiaries Scottish Amicable Insurance Fund (note ii) £m Excluding Prudential Annuities Limited £m Prudential Annuities Limited (note iii) £m Prudential Retirement Income Limited £m Total (note iv) £m Other non-profit unit-linked and other business (note v) £m UK insurance operations Total £m Total 2006 £m Total 2005 £m Assets Intangible assets attributable to shareholders: Deferred acquisition costs and acquired in-force value of long-term business contracts Intangible assets attributable to PAC with-profits fund: In respect of acquired venture fund investment subsidiaries Deferred acquisition costs Total – – – 5 5 5 – – 830 26 856 856 – – – – – – – – 830 26 856 856 – – – – – – 167 167 167 167 167 167 199 199 – – – – – – 167 167 830 31 861 1,028 4,733 679 35 714 913 4,457 Other non-investment and non-cash assets 320 2,530 292 2,822 482 1,109 1,591 Investments of long-term business and other operations: Investment properties Financial investments: Loans and receivables Equity securities and portfolio holdings in unit trusts Debt securities Other investments Deposits 1,437 10,174 385 10,559 393 2,040 2,433 14,429 12,670 207 666 212 878 43 – 43 1,128 1,130 7,509 4,306 211 530 40,876 16,795 1,955 3,998 365 13,801 186 355 41,241 30,596 2,141 4,353 20 12,669 37 549 11,476 5,890 72 1,380 11,496 18,559 109 1,929 60,246 53,461 2,461 6,812 58,526 49,452 2,688 6,797 Total investments 14,200 74,464 15,304 89,768 13,711 20,858 34,569 138,537 131,263 Held for sale assets Cash and cash equivalents – 147 463 827 – 123 463 950 – 30 – 852 – 882 463 1,979 728 1,195 Total assets 14,672 79,140 15,719 94,859 14,223 22,986 37,209 146,740 138,556 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 143 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued D2: UK insurance operations continued PAC with-profits sub-fund (note i) Other funds and subsidiaries Scottish Amicable Insurance Fund (note ii) £m Excluding Prudential Annuities Limited £m Prudential Annuities Limited (note iii) £m Prudential Retirement Income Limited £m Total (note iv) £m Other non-profit unit-linked and other business (note v) £m UK insurance operations Total £m Total 2006 £m Total 2005 £m – 24 24 – 55 55 – – – – 55 55 971 – 971 292 – 292 1,263 – 1,263 1,263 79 1,342 1,141 95 1,236 13,393 32,830 13,379 46,209 12,327 8,394 20,721 80,323 79,231 737 27,928 – 12 – – 27,928 12 – 11,886 1,625 13,511 – – – – – 28,665 26,443 11,441 11,441 11,453 10,502 – – 13,511 11,245 Equity and liabilities Equity Shareholders’ equity Minority interests Total equity Liabilities Policyholder liabilities and unallocated surplus of with-profits funds: Insurance contract liabilities Investment contract liabilities with discretionary participation features Investment contract liabilities without discretionary participation features Unallocated surplus of with-profits funds (reflecting application of ‘realistic’ provisions for UK regulated with-profits funds) Total 14,130 72,656 15,004 87,660 12,327 19,835 32,162 133,952 127,421 Operational borrowings attributable to shareholder-financed operations – Borrowings attributable to with-profits funds 112 406 Other non-insurance liabilities – 1,664 4,765 – – 715 – 1,664 5,480 – – 925 11 – 2,848 11 – 3,773 11 1,776 9,659 17 1,898 7,984 Total liabilities 14,648 79,085 15,719 94,804 13,252 22,694 35,946 145,398 137,320 Total equity and liabilities 14,672 79,140 15,719 94,859 14,223 22,986 37,209 146,740 138,556 Notes (i) For the purposes of this table and subsequent explanation, references to the WPSF also include, for convenience, the amounts attaching to the Defined Charges Participating Sub-fund. (ii) Scottish Amicable Insurance Fund (SAIF) is a separate sub-fund within the PAC long-term business fund. (iii) Wholly-owned subsidiary of the PAC WPSF that writes annuity business. (iv) Excluding policyholder liabilities of the Hong Kong branch of PAC. P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H (v) Within policyholder liabilities of £19,835 million for the non-profit unit-linked and other business is £17,679 million for unit-linked business. I (b) Products and guarantees Prudential’s long-term products in the UK consist of life insurance, pension products and pension annuities. These products are written primarily in: • one of three separate sub-funds of the PAC long-term fund, namely the with-profits sub-fund, the SAIF, and the non-profit sub-fund; • Prudential Annuities Limited, which is owned by the PAC with-profits sub-fund; • Prudential Retirement Income Limited, a shareholder-owned subsidiary; or • other shareholder-backed subsidiaries writing mainly non-profit unit-linked business. P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V 144 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements D2: UK insurance operations continued (i) With-profits products and PAC with-profits sub-fund Within the balance sheet of UK insurance operations at 31 December 2006, there are policyholder liabilities of £74.1 billion (2005: £73.2 billion) and unallocated surplus of £13.5 billion (2005: £11.2 billion) that relate to the WPSF. The WPSF mainly contains with-profits business but it also contains some non-profit business (unit-linked, term assurances and annuities). The WPSF’s profits are apportioned 90 per cent to its policyholders and 10 per cent to shareholders as surplus for distribution is determined via the annual actuarial valuation. With-profits products provide returns to policyholders through bonuses that are ‘smoothed’. There are two types of bonuses: ‘annual’ and ‘final’. Annual bonuses are declared once a year, and once credited, are guaranteed in accordance with the terms of the particular product. Unlike annual bonuses, final bonuses are guaranteed only until the next bonus declaration. When determining policy payouts, including final bonuses, Prudential considers policyholders’ reasonable expectations, the need to smooth claim values and payments from year to year and competitive considerations, together with ‘asset shares’ for specimen policies. Asset shares broadly reflect the value of premiums paid plus the investment return on the assets notionally attributed to the policy, less the other items to be charged such as expenses and the cost of the life insurance cover. For many years, UK with-profits product providers, such as Prudential, have been required by law and regulation to consider the reasonable expectations of policyholders in setting bonus levels. This concept is established by statute but is not defined. However, it is defined within the regulatory framework, which also more recently contains an explicit requirement to treat customers fairly. The WPSF held a provision of £47 million at 31 December 2006 (2005: £52 million) to honour guarantees on a small amount of guaranteed annuity products. SAIF’s exposure to guaranteed annuities is described below. Beyond the generic guarantees described above, there are very few explicit options or guarantees such as minimum investment returns, surrender values or annuities at retirement and any granted have generally been at very low levels. (ii) Annuity business Prudential’s conventional annuities include level, fixed increase and retail price index (RPI) annuities. They are mainly written within the subsidiaries PAL, PRIL, Prudential Pensions Limited and the PAC with-profits sub-fund, but there are some annuity liabilities in the non-profit sub-fund and SAIF. Prudential’s fixed-increase annuities incorporate automatic increases in annuity payments by fixed amounts over the policyholder’s life. The RPI annuities that Prudential offers provide for a regular annuity payment to which an additional amount is added periodically based on the increase in the UK RPI. Prudential’s with-profits annuities, which are written in the WPSF, combine the income features of annuity products with the investment smoothing features of with-profits products and enable policyholders to obtain exposure to investment return on the WPSF’s equity shares, property and other investment categories over time. Policyholders select an ‘anticipated bonus’ from the specific range Prudential offers for the particular product. The amount of the annuity payment each year depends upon the relationship between the anticipated bonus rate selected by the policyholder when the product is purchased and the bonus rates Prudential subsequently declares each year during the term of the product. If the total bonus rates fall below the anticipated rate, then the annuity income falls. At 31 December 2006, £29.0 billion (2005: £25.3 billion) of investments relate to annuity business of PAL and PRIL. These investments are predominantly in debt securities (including retail price index-linked bonds to match retail price index-linked annuities), loans and deposits and are duration matched with the estimated duration of the liabilities they support. (iii) SAIF SAIF is a ring-fenced sub-fund of the PAC long-term fund formed following the acquisition of the mutually owned Scottish Amicable Life Assurance Society in 1997. No new business may be written in SAIF, although regular premiums are still being paid on policies in force at the time of the acquisition and incremental premiums are permitted on these policies. P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I The fund is solely for the benefit of policyholders of SAIF. Shareholders have no interest in the profits of this fund although they are entitled to investment management fees on this business. The process for determining policyholder bonuses of SAIF with-profits policies, which constitute the vast majority of obligations of the funds, is similar to that for the with-profits policies of the WPSF. However, in addition, the surplus assets in SAIF are allocated to policies in an orderly and equitable distribution over time as enhancements to policyholder benefits i.e. in excess of those based on asset share. Provision is made for the risks attaching to some SAIF unitised with-profits policies that have MVR-free dates and for those SAIF products which have a guaranteed minimum benefit on death or maturity of premiums accumulated at four per cent per annum. The Group’s main exposure to guaranteed annuities in the UK is through SAIF and a provision of £561 million was held in SAIF at 31 December 2006 (2005: £619 million) to honour the guarantees. As SAIF is a separate sub-fund solely for the benefit of policyholders of SAIF this provision has no impact on the financial position of the Group’s shareholders’ equity. P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 145 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued D2: UK insurance operations continued (iv) Unit-linked (non-annuity) and other non-profit business Prudential UK insurance operations also have an extensive book of unit-linked policies of varying types and provide a range of other non-profit business such as credit life and protection contracts. These contracts do not contain significant financial guarantees. There are no guaranteed maturity values or guaranteed annuity options on unit-linked policies except for minor amounts for certain policies linked to cash units within SAIF. (c) Exposure to market risk (i) Non-linked life and pension business For with-profits business, the absence of guaranteed surrender values and the flexibility given by the operation of the bonus system means that the majority of the investments backing the with-profits business are in equities and real estate with the balance in debt securities, deposits and loans. The investments supporting the protection business are small in value and tend to be fixed maturities reflecting the guaranteed nature of the liabilities. (ii) Pension annuity business Prudential’s UK annuity business employs fixed income investments (including UK retail price index-linked assets) because the liabilities consist of guaranteed payments for as long as each annuitant or surviving partner is alive. Retail price index-linked assets are used to back pension annuities where the payments are linked to the RPI. (iii) Unit-linked business Except through the second order effect on investment management fees, the unit-linked business of the UK insurance operations is not exposed to market risk. The lack of exposure arises from the contract nature whereby policyholder benefits reflect asset value movements of the unit-linked funds. (d) Process for setting assumptions and determining liabilities (i) Overview The calculation of the contract liabilities involves the setting of assumptions for future experience. This is done following detailed review of the relevant experience including, in particular, mortality, expenses, tax, economic assumptions and where applicable, persistency. For with-profits business written in the WPSF or SAIF, a market consistent valuation is performed (as described in section (ii) below). Additional assumptions required are for persistency and the management actions under which the fund is managed. Assumptions used for a market consistent valuation typically do not contain margins, whereas those used for the valuation of other classes of business do. Mortality assumptions are set based on the results of the most recent experience analysis looking at the experience over recent years of the relevant business. For non-profit business, a margin for adverse deviation is added. Different assumptions are applied for different product groups. For annuitant mortality, assumptions for current mortality rates are based on recent experience investigations and expected future improvements in mortality. The expected future improvements are based on recent experience and projections of the business and industry experience generally. Maintenance and, for some classes of business, termination expense assumptions are expressed as per policy amounts. They are set based on the expenses incurred during the year, including an allowance for ongoing investment expenditure and allocated between entities and product groups in accordance with the operation’s internal cost allocation model. For non-profit business a margin for adverse deviation is added to this amount. Expense inflation assumptions are set consistent with the economic basis and based on the difference between yields on nominal gilts and index-linked gilts. The actual renewal expenses charged to SAIF will continue to be based on the tariff arrangement specified in the Scottish Amicable Life Assurance Society Scheme until 31 December 2007, when the tariff arrangement terminates. This provides an additional margin in SAIF as the unit costs derived from actual expenses (and used to derive the recommended assumptions) are generally significantly greater than the tariff costs. The assumptions for investment management expenses are based on the charges specified in agreements with the Group’s investment management operations, plus a margin for adverse deviation for non-profit business. Tax assumptions are set equal to current rates of taxation. For non-profit business excluding unit-linked business, the valuation interest rates used to discount the liabilities are based on the yields as at the valuation date on the assets backing the technical provisions. For fixed interest securities the gross redemption yield is used except for the PAL and PRIL annuity business where the internal rate of return of the assets backing the liabilities is used. For property it is the rental yield, and for equities it is the greater of the dividend yield and the average of the dividend yield and the earnings yield. An adjustment is made to the yield on non risk-free fixed interest securities and property to reflect credit risk. To calculate the non-unit reserves for linked business, assumptions have been set for the gross unit growth rate and the rate of inflation of maintenance expenses, as well as for the valuation interest rate as described above. 146 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements D2: UK insurance operations continued (ii) WPSF and SAIF The policyholder liabilities reported for the WPSF are primarily for two broad types of business. These are accumulating and conventional with-profits contracts. The policyholder liabilities of the WPSF are accounted for under FRS 27. The provisions have been determined on a basis consistent with the detailed methodology included in regulations contained in the FSA’s rules for the determination of reserves on the FSA’s ‘realistic’ Peak 2 basis. In aggregate, the regime has the effect of placing a value on the liabilities of UK with-profits contracts, which reflects the amounts expected to be paid based on the current value of investments held by the with-profits funds and current circumstances. These contracts are a combination of insurance and investment contracts with discretionary participation features, as defined by IFRS 4. The FSA’s Peak 2 calculation under the new realistic regime, which came fully into effect for the first time for 2004 regulatory reporting requires the value of liabilities to be calculated as: • the with-profits benefits reserve (WPBR); plus • future policy related liabilities (FPRL); plus • the realistic current liabilities of the fund. The WPBR is primarily based on the retrospective calculation of accumulated asset shares but is adjusted to reflect future expected policyholder benefits and other outgoings. By contrast, the Peak 1 basis addresses, at least explicitly, only declared bonuses. Asset shares are calculated as the accumulation of all items of income and outgo that are relevant to each policy type. Income comprises credits for premiums, investment returns (including unrealised gains), and miscellaneous profits. Outgo comprises charges for tax (including an allowance for tax on unrealised gains), guarantees and smoothing, mortality and morbidity, shareholders’ profit transfers, miscellaneous losses, and expenses and commission (net of any tax relief). The FPRL must include a market consistent valuation of costs of guarantees, options and smoothing, less any related charges, and this amount must be determined using either a stochastic approach, hedging costs or a series of deterministic projections with attributed probabilities. The assumptions used in the stochastic models are calibrated to produce risk-free returns on each asset class. Volatilities of, and correlations between, investment returns from different asset classes are as determined by the Group’s Portfolio Management Group and aim to be market consistent. The cost of guarantees, options and smoothing is very sensitive to the bonus, market value reduction (MVR), and investment policy employed and therefore the stochastic modelling incorporates a range of management actions that would help to protect the fund in adverse investment scenarios. Substantial flexibility has been included in the modelled management actions in order to reflect the discretion that is retained in adverse investment conditions, thereby avoiding the creation of unreasonable minimum capital requirements. The management actions assumed are consistent with the Group’s management policy for with-profits funds and the Group’s disclosures in the publicly available Principles and Practices of Financial Management. The contract liabilities for with-profits business also required assumptions for persistency. These are set based on the results of recent experience analysis. (iii) Annuity business The contract liabilities for PAL and PRIL are based on the FSA regulatory solvency basis. The valuation is then modified for IFRS reporting purposes to remove certain of the margins for prudence within the assumptions, and contingency reserves, both of which are required under the solvency basis applied for regulatory purposes, but not for financial accounting. The contract liabilities are the discounted value of future claim payments, adjusted for investment expenses and future administration costs. The interest rates used for discounting claim payments are derived from the yields on the assets held with an allowance for default and mismatching risk. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 147 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued D2: UK insurance operations continued The mortality assumptions are set in light of recent population and internal experience. The assumptions used are percentages of standard actuarial mortality tables with an allowance for future mortality improvements. Where annuities have been sold on an enhanced basis to impaired lives an additional age adjustment is made. The percentages of the standard table used are selected according to the source of business. The range of percentages used is set out in the following tables: 2006 In payment Males 106% – 126% PNMA00 (C = 2000) with medium cohort improvement table with a minimum annual improvement of 1.25% PAL Females 84% – 117% PNFA00 (C = 2000) with 75% of medium cohort improvement table with a minimum annual improvement of 0.75% Males 99% – 114% PNMA00 (C = 2000) with medium cohort improvement table with a minimum annual improvement of 1.25% PRIL Females 85% – 103% PNFA00 (C = 2000) with 75% of medium cohort improvement table with a minimum annual improvement of 0.75% In deferment AM92 minus 4 years AF92 minus 4 years AM92 minus 4 years AF92 minus 4 years 2005 In payment Males 93% – 100% PMA92 (C = 2004) with medium cohort improvement table with a minimum annual improvement of 1.25% PAL Females 84% – 105% PFA92 (C = 2004) with 75% of medium cohort improvement table with a minimum annual improvement of 0.75% Males 88% – 100% PMA92 (C = 2004) with medium cohort improvement table with a minimum annual improvement of 1.25% PRIL Females 84% – 102% PFA92 (C = 2004) with 75% of medium cohort improvement table with a minimum annual improvement of 0.75% In deferment AM92 minus 4 years AF92 minus 4 years AM92 minus 4 years AF92 minus 4 years 2004 In payment Males 97% – 111% PMA92 (C = 2004) with medium cohort improvement table with a minimum annual improvement of 1.25% PAL Females 92% – 105% PFA92 (C = 2004) with 75% of medium cohort improvement table with a minimum annual improvement of 0.75% Males 90% – 113% PMA92 (C = 2004) with medium cohort improvement table with a minimum annual improvement of 1.25% PRIL Females 85% – 104% PFA92 (C = 2004) with 75% of medium cohort improvement table with a minimum annual improvement of 0.75% In deferment AM92 minus 4 years AF92 minus 4 years AM92 minus 4 years AF92 minus 4 years (iv) Unit-linked (non-annuity) and other non-profit business The majority of other long-term business written in the UK insurance operations is unit-linked business or other business with similar features. For these contracts the attaching liability reflects the unit value obligation and provision for expenses and mortality risk. The latter component is determined by applying mortality assumptions on a basis that is appropriate for the policyholder profile. For unit-linked business, the assets covering unit liabilities are exposed to market risk, but the residual risk when considering the unit- linked liabilities and assets together is limited to the effect on fund-based charges. For those contracts where the level of insurance risk is insignificant the assets and liabilities arising under the contracts are distinguished between those that relate to the financial instrument liability and acquisition costs and deferred income that relate to the component of the contract that relates to investment management. Acquisition costs and deferred income are recognised consistent with the level of service provision in line with the requirements of IAS 18. (e) Reinsurance The Group’s UK insurance business cedes only minor amounts of business outside the Group. During 2006, reinsurance premiums for externally ceded business were £58 million (2005: £82 million) and reinsurance recoverable insurance assets were £510 million (2005: £750 million) in aggregate. The gains and losses recognised in profit and loss for these contracts were immaterial. 148 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements D2: UK insurance operations continued (f) Effect of changes in assumptions used to measure insurance assets and liabilities 2006 For with-profits business, there was no significant change in assumptions in 2006. There was no change in mortality assumptions for PAL in 2006 which had a material effect on the measurement of the insurance liabilities. Liabilities for PAL were increased by £47 million for the effect of change of assumptions for renewal expenses. As PAL is owned by the WPSF, this change had no effect on shareholder profit. In 2006, the FSA made regulatory changes for UK regulated shareholder-backed non-participating business. These changes were proposed in the consultative paper CP06/16 and confirmed in December 2006 policy statement PS06/14. The changes to the FSA rules allow insurance liabilities for this business to incorporate more realism. In particular this is achieved by: • setting technical provisions for expenses not directly attributable to one particular contract at a homogenous risk group level and not, as previously, at an individual contract level for all non-profit business; and • recognising the economic effect of making a prudent lapse rate assumption. Previously, no lapses were assumed. Under IFRS 4, the effect of this change is accounted for as a change in estimate and there is a consequent increase in operating profit based on longer-term investment returns of £46 million. In addition to the £46 million credit described above, a charge of £4 million was recognised in 2006 for the effect of change of assumption for renewal and termination expenses mainly in respect of PAC. 2005 For with-profits business the only significant change for 2005 was an altered basis of recognising liabilities and unallocated surplus for SAIF. This was to comply with actuarial guidance GN 45, which requires that for a closed fund where the fund will be distributed fully that the working capital is shown as zero, with the future enhancements to asset shares being increased by the free capital. Without the adjustment the unallocated surplus would have been approximately £700 million. Shareholder results and equity were not altered by this change. The change of mortality table for PAL explained in section D2(d) increased liabilities by £144 million. As PAL is owned by the WPSF this change had no affect on shareholder profit. For shareholder-backed non-participating business a number of changes of assumptions were made in 2005. Taken together these changes had the effect of reducing operating profit based on longer-term investment returns before shareholder tax by £36 million with consequent increase in liabilities. The reduction arose from a charge of £69 million for strengthened mortality assumptions, being partially offset by a net credit of £29 million in respect of a reduced level of expected defaults for debt securities, and a credit of £4 million for other changes. As described in section A4, the Group provides supplementary analysis of its profit before shareholder tax, distinguishing operating profit based on longer-term investment returns from short-term fluctuations in investment returns, actuarial gains and losses on defined benefit pension schemes, and exceptional items. In addition to the £36 million charge described above, an additional £20 million charge for 2005 for the effect of change of assumption for renewal expenses, which relates to an increase in ongoing future pension scheme contributions as described in section B1, was recorded as part of actuarial and other gains and losses excluded from operating profit but included in total profit before shareholder tax. The net charge of £36 million comprised amounts in respect of PAC (£35 million charge), Prudential Holborn Life (£2 million credit) and PRIL (£3 million charge). Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 149 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued D2: UK insurance operations continued (g) Amount, timing and uncertainty of future cash flows from insurance contracts At 31 December 2006, the EEV basis value of in-force business of UK insurance operations, after taking account of the cost of encumbered capital and the cost of the time value of financial options and guarantees, was £4,835 million (2005: £4,274 million). This value has been determined after applying the principles of valuation described in note D1 and the following key assumptions. Risk discount rate for in-force business at the start of the year Pre-tax expected long-term nominal rates of investment return: UK equities Overseas equities Property Gilts Corporate bonds Expected long-term rate of inflation Post-tax expected long-term nominal rate of return for the with-profits sub-fund Pensions business (where no tax applies) Life business The sensitivity of the value of in-force business and net worth to changes in key assumptions is as follows: Economic assumptions: Discount rates – 1% increase Interest rates (including consequential changes for assumed investment returns for all asset classes, market values of debt securities, and all risk discount rates): – 1% increase (note) – 1% decrease (note) Equity/property yields – 1% rise Equity/property market values – 10% fall Non-economic assumptions: Maintenance expenses – 10% decrease Lapse rates – 10% decrease Mortality and morbidity – 5% decrease in base rates (i.e. increased longevity) 2006 % 8.0 2005 % 7.7 8.6 8.6 to 9.3 7.1 4.6 5.3 3.1 8.1 8.1 to 8.75 6.4 4.1 4.9 2.9 7.5 6.6 7.1 6.3 £m £m (480) (432) 55 (70) 382 (502) 33 75 (87) 69 (99) 297 (480) 33 68 (62) Note 2005 comparatives have been adjusted to reflect refinements to the methodology in UK insurance operations, for the effect of interest rate movements. (h) Sensitivity of IFRS basis profit or loss and equity to changes that have a material effect The primary sensitivities that have a material effect on the IFRS basis results of the UK insurance operations relate to asset/liability matching and mortality experience for shareholder-backed annuity business. Further details are described below. (i) With-profits business SAIF Shareholders have no interest in the profits of SAIF but are entitled to the investment management fees paid on the business. P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V With-profits sub-fund business For with-profits business (including non-participating business of PAL which is owned by the WPSF) adjustments to liabilities and any related tax effects are recognised in the income statement. However, except for any impact on the annual declaration of bonuses, shareholders’ profit for with-profits business is unaffected. This is because IFRS basis profits for with-profits business, which are determined on the same basis as on preceding UK GAAP, solely reflect one-ninth of the cost of bonuses declared for the year. The main factors that influence the determination of bonus rates are the return on the investments of the fund, the effect of inflation, taxation, the expenses of the fund chargeable to policyholders and the degree to which investment returns are smoothed. Mortality and other insurance risk are relatively minor factors. Unallocated surplus represents the excess of assets over policyholder liabilities of the fund. As unallocated surplus of the WPSF is recorded as a liability, movements in its value do not affect shareholders’ profits or equity. The level of unallocated surplus is particularly sensitive to the level of investment returns on the portion of the life fund assets that represents the surplus. The effects for 2006 and 2005 are demonstrated in note D5. 150 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements D2: UK insurance operations continued (ii) Shareholder-backed annuity business Profits from shareholder-backed annuity business are most sensitive to: • the extent to which the duration of the assets held closely matches the expected duration of the liabilities under the contracts. Assuming close matching, the impact of short-term asset value movements as a result of interest rate movements will broadly offset changes in the value of liabilities caused by movements in valuation rates of interest; • actual versus expected default rates on assets held; • the difference between long-term rates of return on corporate bonds and risk-free rates; • the variance between actual and expected mortality experience; • the extent to which expected future mortality experience gives rise to changes in the measurement of liabilities; and • changes in renewal expense levels. A decrease in assumed mortality rates of one per cent would decrease gross profits by approximately £34 million (2005: £33 million). A decrease in credit default assumptions of five basis points would increase gross profits by £64 million (2005: £65 million). A decrease in renewal expenses (excluding investment management expenses) of five per cent would increase gross profits by £14 million (2005: £12 million). The effect on profits would be approximately symmetrical for changes in assumptions that are directionally opposite to those explained above. (iii) Unit-linked and other business Unit-linked and other business represents a comparatively small proportion of the in-force business of the UK insurance operations. Profits from unit-linked and similar contracts primarily arise from the excess of charges to policyholders, for management of assets under the Company’s stewardship, over expenses incurred. The former is most sensitive to the net accretion of funds under management as a function of new business and lapse and mortality experience. The accounting impact of the latter is dependent upon the amortisation of acquisition costs in line with the emergence of margins (for insurance contracts) and amortisation in line with service provision (for the investment management component of investment contracts). By virtue of the design features of most of the contracts which provide low levels of mortality cover, the profits are relatively insensitive to changes in mortality experience. (iv) Exposure to interest rate risk By virtue of the fund structure, product features and basis of accounting described in note D2(b) and (d), the policyholder liabilities of the UK insurance operations are, except for pension annuity business, not generally exposed to interest rate risk. For pension annuity, business liabilities are exposed to fair value interest rate risk. However, the net exposure to the PAC WPSF (for PAL) and shareholders (for liabilities of PRIL and the non-profit sub-fund) is very substantially ameliorated by virtue of the close matching of assets with appropriate duration. (i) Duration of liabilities With the exception of most unitised with-profits bonds and other whole of life contracts the majority of the contracts of the UK insurance operations have a contract term. However, in effect, the maturity term of contracts reflects the earlier of death, maturity, or lapsation. In addition, with-profit contract liabilities as noted in note D2(d) above include projected future bonuses based on current investment values. The actual amounts payable will vary with future investment performance of SAIF and the WPSF. To ascribe particular amounts payable to these contracts in future years does not provide appropriate information. The tables below show the carrying value of the policyholder liabilities. Separately, the Group uses cash flow projections of expected benefit payments as part of the determination of the value of in-force business when preparing EEV basis results. The tables below also show the maturity profile of the cash flows used for 2006 and 2005 for that purpose for insurance contracts, as defined by IFRS, i.e. those containing significant insurance risk, and investment contracts, which do not. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 151 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued D2: UK insurance operations continued 2006 With-profits business Insurance contracts £m Investment contracts £m Annuity business (Insurance contracts) Other Total £m PAL £m PRIL £m Total £m Insurance contracts £m Investment contracts £m Total £m Policyholder liabilities 46,223 28,677 74,900 13,379 12,327 25,706 8,394 11,441 19,835 % % % % % % % % % Expected maturity: 0 to 5 years 5 to 10 years 10 to 15 years 15 to 20 years 20 to 25 years Over 25 years 2005 47 28 13 6 3 3 23 22 17 15 13 10 36 26 15 10 7 6 32 24 18 12 7 7 30 23 17 12 8 10 Annuity business (Insurance contracts) 31 24 18 12 7 8 32 24 18 12 7 7 37 23 14 13 5 8 Other Insurance contracts £m Investment contracts £m 34 23 16 13 7 7 Total £m With-profits business Insurance contracts £m Investment contracts £m Total £m PAL £m PRIL £m Total £m Policyholder liabilities 47,435 26,443 73,878 14,068 8,324 22,392 9,404 10,502 19,906 Expected maturity: 0 to 5 years 5 to 10 years 10 to 15 years 15 to 20 years 20 to 25 years Over 25 years % 48 29 13 6 3 1 % 25 24 18 14 11 8 % 39 27 15 9 6 4 % 32 24 17 12 7 8 % 29 22 17 12 8 12 % 31 23 17 12 8 9 % 33 25 18 14 6 4 % 45 24 14 8 5 4 % 36 25 17 12 6 4 Notes (i) The cash flow projections of expected benefit payments used in the maturity profile table above are from value of in-force business and exclude the value of future new business, including vesting of internal pension contracts. (ii) Benefit payments do not reflect the pattern of bonuses and shareholder transfers in respect of the with-profits business. (iii) Investment contracts under Other comprise certain unit-linked and similar contracts accounted for under IAS 39 and IAS 18. (iv) For business with no maturity term included within the contracts, for example with-profits investment bonds such as Prudence Bond, an assumption is made as to likely duration based on prior experience. 152 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements D3: US operations (a) Summary balance sheet at 31 December 2006 Assets Intangible assets attributable to shareholders: Goodwill Deferred acquisition costs and acquired in-force value of long-term business contracts Total Other non-investment and non-cash assets Investments of long-term business and other operations: Investment properties Financial investments: Loans and receivables Equity securities and portfolio holdings in unit trusts Debt securities Other investments Deposits Total investments Cash and cash equivalents Total assets Equity and liabilities Equity Shareholders’ equity Minority interests Total equity Liabilities Policyholder liabilities: Long-term business Variable annuity separate account assets and liabilities* £m Fixed annuity, GIC and other business* £m Broker- dealer and fund Total management £m £m US operations Total 2006 £m Total 2005 £m – – – – – – – 1,712 1,712 1,588 1,712 1,712 1,588 20 20 – 11,367 – – – 3,254 343 20,146 542 457 3,254 11,710 20,146 542 457 11,367 24,762 36,129 – 99 99 16 – 16 83 – – – – 28 7 35 33 16 16 1,712 1,728 1,671 1,634 1,650 1,888 20 41 3,254 11,710 20,146 570 464 3,577 8,847 24,290 825 380 36,164 37,960 132 202 11,367 28,161 39,528 167 39,695 41,700 – – – 2,656 1 2,657 2,656 1 2,657 57 – 57 – – – – – 110 110 2,713 1 2,714 2,969 2 2,971 30,184 30,479 1,562 1,502 31,746 31,981 127 743 4,365 145 1,085 5,518 36,981 38,729 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Insurance contract liabilities Investment contract liabilities without discretionary participation features (GIC and annuity certain) Total 11,367 18,817 30,184 – 1,562 1,562 11,367 20,379 31,746 Core structural borrowings of shareholder-financed operations Operational borrowings attributable to shareholder-financed operations Other non-insurance liabilities – – – 127 743 4,255 127 743 4,255 Total liabilities Total equity and liabilities 11,367 25,504 36,871 11,367 28,161 39,528 167 39,695 41,700 *Assets and liabilities attaching to variable annuity business that are not held in the separate account are shown within other business. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 153 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued D3: US operations continued Summary policyholder liabilities (net of reinsurance) and reserves at 31 December 2006 The policyholder liabilities, net of reinsurers’ share of £427 million (2005: £520 million) reflect balances in respect of the following: Policy reserves and liabilities on non-linked business: Reserves for future policyholder benefits and claims payable Deposits on investment contracts (as defined under US GAAP) Guaranteed investment contracts Unit-linked (variable annuity) business 2006 £m 2005 £m 935 17,690 1,327 11,367 971 20,702 1,214 8,574 31,319 31,461 In addition to the policyholder liabilities above, Jackson has entered into a programme of funding arrangements under contracts which, in substance, are almost identical to GICs. The liabilities under these funding arrangements totalled £2,552 million (2005: £3,267 million) and are included in ‘other non-insurance liabilities’ in the balance sheet above. (b) Products and guarantees Jackson provides long-term savings and retirement products to retail and institutional customers throughout the US. Jackson offers fixed annuities (interest-sensitive, fixed indexed and immediate annuities), variable annuities (VA), life insurance and institutional products. (i) Fixed annuities Interest-sensitive annuities At 31 December 2006, interest-sensitive fixed annuities accounted for 31 per cent (2005: 36 per cent) of policy and contract liabilities of Jackson. Interest-sensitive fixed annuities are primarily deferred annuity products that are used for retirement planning and for providing income in retirement. They permit tax-deferred accumulation of funds and flexible payout options. The policyholder of an interest-sensitive fixed annuity pays Jackson a premium, which is credited to the policyholder’s account. Periodically, interest is credited to the policyholder’s account and in some cases administrative charges are deducted from the policyholder’s account. Jackson makes benefit payments at a future date as specified in the policy based on the value of the policyholder’s account at that date. The policy provides that at Jackson’s discretion it may reset the interest rate, subject to a guaranteed minimum. The minimum guarantee varies from 1.5 per cent to 5.5 per cent (2005: 1.5 per cent to 5.5 per cent) depending on the jurisdiction of issue and the date of issue, with 80 per cent (2005: 73 per cent) of the fund at three per cent or less. The average guarantee rate is 3.1 per cent (2005: 3.3 per cent). Approximately 35 per cent (2005: 29 per cent) of the interest-sensitive fixed annuities Jackson wrote in 2006 provide for a market value adjustment, that could be positive or negative, on surrenders in the surrender period of the policy. This formula-based adjustment approximates the change in value that assets supporting the product would realise as interest rates move up or down. The minimum guaranteed rate is not affected by this adjustment. Fixed indexed annuities Fixed indexed annuities accounted for seven per cent (2005: seven per cent) of Jackson’s policy and contract liabilities at 31 December 2006. Fixed indexed annuities vary in structure, but generally are deferred annuities that enable policyholders to obtain a portion of an equity-linked return (based on participation rates and caps) but provide a guaranteed minimum return. These guaranteed minimum rates are generally set at three per cent. Jackson hedges the equity return risk on fixed indexed products using futures and options linked to the relevant index. The cost of these hedges is taken into account in setting the index participation rates and caps. Jackson bears the investment and surrender risk on these products. Immediate annuities At 31 December 2006, immediate annuities accounted for two per cent (2005: two per cent) of Jackson’s policy and contract liabilities. Immediate annuities guarantee a series of payments beginning within a year of purchase and continuing over either a fixed period of years and/or the life of the policyholder. If the term is for the life of the policyholder, then Jackson’s primary risk is mortality risk. The implicit interest rate on these products is based on the market conditions that exist at the time the policy is issued and is guaranteed for the term of the annuity. 154 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements D3: US operations continued (ii) Variable annuities At 31 December 2006, VAs accounted for 38 per cent (2005: 32 per cent) of Jackson’s policy and contract liabilities. VAs are deferred annuities that have the same tax advantages and payout options as interest-sensitive and fixed indexed annuities. The primary differences between VAs and interest-sensitive or fixed indexed annuities are investment risk and return. If a policyholder chooses a VA, the rate of return depends upon the performance of the selected fund portfolio. Policyholders may allocate their investment to either the fixed or variable account. Investment risk on the variable account is borne by the policyholder, while investment risk on the fixed account is borne by Jackson through guaranteed minimum fixed rates of return. At 31 December 2006, approximately 13 per cent (2005: 19 per cent) of VA funds were in fixed accounts. Jackson issues VA contracts where it contractually guarantees to the contractholder either a) return of no less than total deposits made to the contract adjusted for any partial withdrawals, b) total deposits made to the contract adjusted for any partial withdrawals plus a minimum return, or c) the highest contract value on a specified anniversary date adjusted for any withdrawals following the contract anniversary. These guarantees include benefits that are payable in the event of death (guaranteed minimum death benefit (GMDB)), annuitisation (guaranteed minimum income benefit (GMIB)), or at specified dates during the accumulation period (guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefit (GMWB)). Jackson hedges these risks using equity options and futures contracts as described in note D3(c). (iii) Life insurance Jackson’s life insurance products accounted for 10 per cent (2005: nine per cent) of Jackson’s policy and contract liabilities at 31 December 2006. The products offered include variable universal life insurance, term life insurance and interest-sensitive life insurance. (iv) Institutional products Jackson’s institutional products consist of GICs, funding agreements (including agreements issued in conjunction with Jackson’s participation in the US Federal Home Loan Bank programme) and medium-term note funding agreements. At 31 December 2006, institutional products accounted for 12 per cent of policy and contract liabilities (2005: 14 per cent). Under a traditional GIC, the policyholder makes a lump sum deposit. The interest rate paid is fixed and established when the contract is issued. If deposited funds are withdrawn earlier than the specified term of the contract, an adjustment is made that approximates a market value adjustment. Under a funding agreement, the policyholder either makes a lump sum deposit or makes specified periodic deposits. Jackson agrees to pay a rate of interest, which may be fixed but which is usually a floating short-term interest rate linked to an external index. The average term of the funding arrangements is one to two years. Funding agreements terminable by the policyholder with less than 90 days’ notice account for less than one per cent (2005: one per cent) of total policyholder reserves. Medium-term note funding agreements are generally issued to support trust instruments issued on non-US exchanges or to qualified investors (as defined by SEC Rule 144A). Through the funding agreements, Jackson agrees to pay a rate of interest, which may be fixed or floating, to the holders of the trust instruments. (c) Risk management Jackson’s main exposures to market risk are through its exposure to interest rate risk and equity risk. Approximately 89 per cent (2005: 88 per cent) of its general account investments support interest-sensitive and fixed indexed annuities, life business and surplus and 11 per cent (2005: 12 per cent) support institutional business. All of these types of business contain considerable interest rate guarantee features and, consequently, require that the assets that support them are primarily fixed income or fixed maturity. Prudential is exposed primarily to the following risks in the US arising from fluctuations in interest rates: • the risk of loss related to meeting guaranteed rates of accumulation following a sharp and sustained fall in interest rates; • the risk of loss related to policyholder withdrawals following a sharp and sustained increase in interest rates; and • the risk of mismatch between the expected duration of certain annuity liabilities and prepayment risk and extension risk inherent in mortgage-backed securities. Jackson enters into financial derivative transactions, including swaps, forwards, put-swaptions, futures and options to reduce and manage business risks. These transactions manage the risk of a change in the value, yield, price, cash flows, or quantity of, or a degree of exposure with respect to assets, liabilities or future cash flows, which Jackson has acquired or incurred. Jackson generally uses free-standing derivative instruments for hedging purposes. Additionally, certain liabilities, primarily trust instruments supported by funding agreements, fixed indexed annuities, certain GMWB variable annuity features and reinsured GMIB variable annuity features contain embedded derivatives as defined by IAS 39, ‘Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement’. Jackson does not account for such derivatives as either fair value or cash flow hedges as might be permitted if the specific hedge documentation requirements of IAS 39 were followed. Financial derivatives, including derivatives embedded in certain host liabilities that have been separated for accounting and financial reporting purposes are carried at fair value. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 155 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued D3: US operations continued Value movements on the derivatives are reported within the income statement. Under the Group’s accounting policies supplementary analysis of the profit before taxes attributable to shareholders is provided as shown in note B1. In preparing this analysis, value movements on Jackson derivative contracts, other than for certain equity-based product management activities, are included within short-term fluctuations in investment returns and excluded from operating results based on longer-term investment returns. Value movements on derivative instruments used for certain equity-based product management activities are included within operating results based on longer-term investment returns, as the value movements broadly offset the economic impact of changed levels of benefit payments and reserves as equity markets fluctuate. The types of derivative used by Jackson and their purpose are as follows: • interest rate swaps generally involve the exchange of fixed and floating payments over the life of the agreement without an exchange of the underlying principal amount. These agreements are used for hedging purposes; • forwards consist of interest spreadlock agreements, in which Jackson locks in the forward interest rate differential between a swap and the corresponding US Treasury security. The forwards are held as a hedge of corporate spreads; • put-swaption contracts provide the purchaser with the right, but not the obligation, to require the writer to pay the present value of a long-duration interest rate swap at future exercise dates. Jackson purchases and writes put-swaptions with maturities up to 10 years. On a net basis, put-swaptions hedge against significant upward movements in interest rates; • equity index futures contracts and equity index call and put options are used to hedge Jackson’s obligations associated with its issuance of fixed indexed immediate and deferred annuities and certain VA guarantees. These annuities and guarantees contain embedded options which are fair valued for financial reporting purposes; • total return swaps in which Jackson receives equity returns or returns based on reference pools of assets in exchange for short-term floating rate payments based on notional amounts, are held for both hedging and investment purposes; and • cross-currency swaps, which embody spot and forward currency swaps and additionally, in some cases, interest rate swaps and equity index swaps, are entered into for the purpose of hedging Jackson’s foreign currency denominated funding agreements supporting trust instrument obligations. As noted above, Jackson is exposed to equity risk through the options embedded in the fixed indexed liabilities and GMDB and GMWB guarantees included in certain VA benefits. This risk is managed using a comprehensive equity hedging programme to minimise the risk of a significant economic impact as a result of increases or decreases in equity market levels while taking advantage of naturally offsetting exposures in Jackson’s operations. Jackson purchases external futures and options that hedge the risks inherent in these products, while also considering the impact of rising and falling separate account fees. As a result of this hedging programme, if the equity markets were to increase, Jackson’s free-standing derivatives would decrease in value. However, over time, this movement would be broadly offset by increased separate account fees and reserve decreases, net of the related changes to amortisation of deferred acquisition costs. Due to the nature of the free-standing and embedded derivatives, this hedge, while highly effective on an economic basis, may not completely mute the immediate impact of the market movements as the free-standing derivatives reset immediately while the hedged liabilities reset more slowly (see note (d) for further details on the valuation of the guarantees) and fees are recognised prospectively. It is estimated that an immediate increase in the equity markets of 10 per cent would result in a net accounting charge of up to £20 million, excluding the impact on future separate account fees. The actual impact on financial results would vary contingent upon the volume of new product sales and lapses, changes to the derivative portfolio, correlation of market returns and various other factors including volatility, interest rates and elapsed time. For risk management purposes, the US general account portfolio is divided substantially into assets that support the interest-sensitive life and fixed annuity business, the institutional business and the fixed indexed business. Jackson hedges the equity return risk on fixed indexed products by purchasing futures and options on the relevant index. Information on credit risk of debt securities and mortgage-backed securities For statutory reporting in the US, debt securities are classified into six quality categories specified by the Securities Valuation Office of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC). The categories range from Class 1 (the highest) to Class 6 (the lowest). Performing securities are designated as Classes 1 to 5. Securities in or near default are designated Class 6. Securities designated as Class 3, 4, 5 and 6 are non-investment grade securities. Generally, securities rated AAA to A by nationally recognised statistical ratings organisations are reflected in Class 1, BBB in Class 2, BB in Class 3 and B and below in Classes 4 to 6. If a designation is not currently available from the NAIC, Jackson’s investment advisor, PPM America, provides the designation for the purposes of disclosure below. 156 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements D3: US operations continued The following table shows the quality of publicly traded and SEC Rule 144A traded debt securities held by the US operations as at 31 December 2006 and 2005: 2006 Carrying value 2005 Carrying value NAIC designation: 1 2 3 4 5 6 £m % of total £m % of total 4,631 5,850 817 249 22 – 40 51 7 2 0 – 5,852 7,622 1,183 320 30 – 39 51 8 2 0 – 11,569 100 15,007 100 The following table shows the quality of the non-SEC Rule 144A traded private placement portfolio: NAIC designation: 1 2 3 4 5 6 The following table shows the quality of residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities: Residential mortgage-backed securities (included within debt securities) Total residential mortgage-backed securities Residential mortgage-backed securities rated AAA or equivalent by a nationally recognised statistical ratings organisation (including Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s and Fitch): Amount Percentage of total Residential mortgage-backed securities rated NAIC 1: Amount Percentage of total Commercial mortgage-backed securities (included within debt securities) Total commercial mortgage-backed securities Commercial mortgage-backed securities rated by a nationally recognised statistical ratings organisation (including Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s and Fitch): Amount Percentage of total Commercial mortgage-backed securities rated investment grade: Amount Percentage of total 2006 Carrying value 2005 Carrying value £m % of total £m % of total 861 1,345 212 40 – – 2,458 35 54 9 2 – – 100 1,368 1,471 299 51 – 11 3,200 43 46 9 2 – 0 100 2006 £m (unless otherwise stated) 2005 £m (unless otherwise stated) 2,827 2,303 1,750 61.9% 2,824 99.9% 2,002 86.9% 2,300 99.9% 1,155 1,385 1,090 94.4% 1,385 100.0% 1,076 93.2% 1,364 98.5% Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 157 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued D3: US operations continued (d) Process for setting assumptions and determining liabilities Under the MSB of reporting applied under IFRS 4 for insurance contracts, providing the requirements of the Companies Act, UK GAAP standards and the ABI SORP are met, it is permissible to reflect the previously applied UK GAAP basis. Accordingly, and consistent with the basis explained in note A4, in the case of Jackson the carrying values of insurance assets and liabilities are consolidated into the Group accounts based on US GAAP. Under US GAAP, investment contracts (as defined for US GAAP purposes) are accounted for by applying in the first instance a retrospective deposit method to determine the liability for policyholder benefits. This is then augmented by potentially three additional amounts. These amounts are for: • any amounts that have been assessed to compensate the insurer for services to be performed over future periods (i.e. deferred income); • any amounts previously assessed against policyholders that are refundable on termination of the contract; and • any probable future loss on the contract (i.e. premium deficiency). Capitalised acquisition costs and deferred income for these contracts are amortised over the life of the book of contracts. The present value of the estimated gross profits is generally computed using the rate of interest that accrues to policyholder balances (sometimes referred to as the contract rate). Estimated gross profits include estimates of the following elements, each of which will be determined based on the best estimate of amounts of the following individual elements over the life of the book of contracts without provision for adverse deviation for: • amounts expected to be assessed for mortality less benefit claims in excess of related policyholder balances; • amounts expected to be assessed for contract administration less costs incurred for contract administration; • amounts expected to be earned from the investment of policyholder balances less interest credited to policyholder balances; • amounts expected to be assessed against policyholder balances upon termination of contracts (sometimes referred to as surrender charges); and • other expected assessments and credits. VA contracts written by Jackson may, as described above, provide for GMDB, GMIB and GMWB features. In general terms, liabilities for these benefits are accounted for under US GAAP by using estimates of future benefits and fees under best estimate persistency assumptions. The GMDB liability is determined each period end by estimating the expected value of death benefits in excess of the projected account balance and recognising the excess rateably over the life of the contract based on total expected assessments. At 31 December 2006, the GMDB liability was valued using a series of deterministic investment performance scenarios, a mean investment return of 8.4 per cent (2005: 8.4 per cent) and assumptions for lapse, mortality and expense that are the same as those used in amortising the capitalised acquisition costs. The direct GMIB liability is determined by estimating the expected value of the annuitisation benefits in excess of the projected account balance at the date of annuitisation and recognising the excess rateably over the accumulation period based on total expected assessments. The assumptions used for calculating the direct GMIB liability at 31 December 2006 and 2005 are consistent with those used for calculating the GMDB liability. Jackson regularly evaluates estimates used and adjusts the additional GMDB and GMIB liability balances, with a related charge or credit to benefit expense, if actual experience or other evidence suggests that earlier assumptions should be revised. GMIB benefits are essentially fully reinsured, subject to annual claim limits. As this reinsurance benefit is net settled, it is considered to be a derivative under IAS 39 and is, therefore, recognised at fair value with the change in fair value included as a component of short-term derivative fluctuations. Most GMWB features are considered to be embedded derivatives under IAS 39. Therefore, provisions for these benefits are recognised at fair value, with the change in fair value included in operating profit based on longer-term investment returns. Certain GMWB features guarantee payments over a lifetime and, therefore, include mortality risk. Provisions for these GMWB amounts are valued consistent with the GMDB valuation method discussed above. 158 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements D3: US operations continued The fair values of the GMWB and GMIB reinsurance derivatives are calculated based on actuarial assumptions related to the projected cash flows, including benefits and related contract charges, over the expected lives of the contracts, incorporating expectations regarding policyholder behaviour in varying economic conditions. As the nature of these cash flows can be quite varied, stochastic techniques are used to generate a variety of market return scenarios for evaluation. The generation of these scenarios and the assumptions as to policyholder behaviour involve numerous estimates and subjective judgements, including those regarding expected market volatility, correlations of market returns and discount rates, utilisation of the benefit by policyholders under varying conditions, and policyholder lapsation. At each valuation date, Jackson assumes expected returns based on risk-free rates as represented by the LIBOR forward curve rates as of that date and market volatility as determined with reference to implied volatility data and evaluations of historical volatilities for various indices. The risk-free spot rates as represented by the LIBOR spot curve as of the valuation date are used to determine the present value of expected future cash flows produced in the stochastic process. With the exception of the GMDB, GMIB and GMWB features of VA contracts, the financial guarantee features of Jackson’s contracts are in most circumstances not explicitly valued, but the impact of any interest guarantees would be reflected as they are earned in the current account value (i.e. the US GAAP liability). For traditional life insurance contracts, provisions for future policy benefits are determined under US GAAP standards SFAS 60, ‘Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises’ using the net level premium method and assumptions as of the issue date as to mortality, interest, policy lapses and expenses plus provisions for adverse deviation. Institutional products are accounted for as investment contracts under IFRS with the liability classified as being in respect of financial instruments rather than insurance contracts, as defined by IFRS 4. In practice, there is no material difference between the IFRS and US GAAP basis of recognition and measurement for these contracts. Certain institutional products representing obligations issued in currencies other than US dollars have been hedged for changes in exchange rates using cross-currency swaps. The fair value of derivatives embedded in funding agreements, as well as foreign currency transaction gains and losses, are included in the carrying value of the trust instruments supported by funding agreements. (e) Reinsurance The principal reinsurance ceded by Jackson outside the Group is on term life insurance, direct and assumed accident and health business and GMIB variable annuity guarantees. In 2006, the premiums for such ceded business amounted to £66 million (2005: £78 million). Net commissions received on ceded business and claims incurred ceded to external reinsurers totalled £12 million and £53 million, respectively, during 2006 (2005: £13 million and £54 million respectively). There were no deferred gains or losses on reinsurance contracts in either 2006 or 2005. The reinsurance asset for business ceded outside the Group was £427 million (2005: £520 million). (f) Effect of changes in assumptions used to measure insurance assets and liabilities 2006 The operating profit based on longer-term investment returns of £408 million for US operations for 2006 has been determined after taking account of several changes of assumptions during the year. Generally, assumptions were modified in 2006 to conform to more recent experience. These changes included revisions to the assumptions regarding utilisation of free partial withdrawal options, resulting in a decrease in Deferred Acquisition Costs (DAC) of £12 million. In addition, several smaller changes relating to lapse rates, mortality rates and other assumptions, resulted in an increase of £6 million in DAC. Combined with other minor modifications, the resulting net impact of all changes during the year was a decrease in pre-tax profits of £7 million. 2005 The operating profit based on longer-term investment returns of £362 million for US operations for 2005 has been determined after taking account of material changes of assumptions during the year. Several assumptions were modified in 2005 to conform to more recent experience. The most significant changes included a DAC write-down of £21 million for single premium deferred annuities partial withdrawal changes and a Universal Life SOP 03-1, ‘Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises for Certain Non-traditional Long Duration Contracts and Separate Accounts’ reserve increase of £13 million due to increasing the mortality assumption. Several smaller changes relating to single premium whole life surrenders and annuity mortality and annuitisation rates, resulted in a £19 million benefit on adjusting amortisation of DAC. Combined with other minor modifications, the resulting net impact of all changes during the year was a decrease in pre-tax profits of £7 million. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 159 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued D3: US operations continued (g) Amount, timing and uncertainty of future cash flows from insurance contracts At 31 December 2006, the EEV basis value of in-force business of the US operations, after taking account of the cost of encumbered capital, and the cost of the time value of financial options and guarantees, was £1,320 million (2005: £1,251 million). This value has been determined after applying the principles of valuation described in note D1. The key assumptions in these projections are the risk discount rates, which are 8.4 per cent (2005: 8.0 per cent) for variable annuity business and 5.6 per cent (2005: 5.2 per cent) for other business, and the expected ultimate spread between the earned rate and the rate credited to policyholders for single premium deferred annuity business of 1.75 per cent. The sensitivity of the value of in-force business and net worth to changes in key assumptions is as follows: Economic assumptions: Discount rates – 1% increase Interest rates (including consequential changes for assumed investment returns for all asset classes, market values of debt securities and all risk discount rates): – 1% increase – 1% decrease Equity/Property yields – 1% rise Equity/Property market values – 10% fall Non-economic assumptions: Maintenance expenses – 10% decrease Lapse rates – 10% decrease Mortality and morbidity – 5% decrease in base rates (i.e. increased longevity) 2006 £m 2005 £m (127) (133) (190) 116 46 (58) 32 110 75 (144) 55 42 (55) 36 90 90 Notes 2005 comparatives have been adjusted to reflect the effect of equity falls where the impact of associated hedging activity on variable annuity business is now included. (h) Sensitivity of IFRS basis profit and equity to changes that have a material effect (i) Currency fluctuations Consistent with the Group’s accounting policies, the profits of the Group’s US operations are translated at average exchange rates and shareholders’ equity at the closing rate for the reporting period. For 2006, the rates were US$1.84 (2005: US$1.82) and US$1.96 (2005: US$1.72) to £1 sterling respectively. A 10 per cent increase in these rates would reduce reported profit before tax attributable to shareholders and shareholders’ equity attributable to US insurance operations by £42 million (2005: £48 million) and £247 million (2005: £270 million) respectively. (ii) Other sensitivities The principal determinants of variations in operating profit based on longer-term returns are: • growth in the size of assets under management covering the liabilities for the contracts in force; and • spread returns for the difference between investment returns and rates credited to policyholders. For the purpose of determining longer-term returns, adjustment is necessary for the normalisation of investment returns to remove the effects of short-term volatility in investment returns. • amortisation of deferred acquisition costs. For term business, acquisition costs are deferred and amortised in line with expected premiums. For annuity business, acquisition costs are deferred and amortised in line with expected gross profits on the relevant contracts. For interest-sensitive business, the key assumption is the expected long-term spread between the earned rate and the rate credited to policyholders, which is based on an annual spread analysis. In addition, expected gross profits depend on mortality assumptions, assumed unit costs and terminations other than deaths (including the related charges) all of which are based on a combination of actual experience of Jackson, industry experience and future expectations. A detailed analysis of actual experience is measured by internally developed mortality and persistency studies. For variable annuity business, the key assumption is the expected long-term level of equity market returns, which for 2006 and 2005 was 8.4 per cent per annum implemented using a mean reversion methodology. These returns affect the level of future expected profits through their effects on the fee income and the required level of provision for guaranteed minimum death benefit claims. 160 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements D3: US operations continued • variations in fees and other income, offset by variations in market value adjustment payments and, where necessary, strengthening of liabilities. Except to the extent of mortality experience, which primarily affects profits through variations in claim payments and GMDB reserves, the profits of Jackson are relatively insensitive to changes in insurance risk. (iii) Exposure to interest rate risk Notwithstanding the market risk exposure described in note D3(c), except in the circumstances of interest rate scenarios where the guarantee rates included in contract terms are higher than crediting rates that can be supported from assets held to cover liabilities, the accounting measurement of liabilities of Jackson products is not generally sensitive to interest rate risk. This position derives from the nature of the products and the US GAAP basis of measurement described in notes D3(b) and D3(d). (i) Duration of liabilities The Group uses cash flow projections of expected benefit payments as part of the determination of the value of in-force business when preparing EEV basis results. The maturity profile of the cash flows used for that purpose for 2006 and 2005 is as follows: Policyholder liabilities Expected maturity: 0 to 5 years 5 to 10 years 10 to 15 years 15 to 20 years 20 to 25 years Over 25 years 2006 2005 (note (i)) Fixed annuity and other business (including GICs and similar contracts) £m Fixed annuity and other usiness (including GICs and similar contracts) £m Variable annuity £m 20,379 11,367 23,407 % % 53 26 11 5 3 2 48 30 13 6 2 1 % 52 26 12 6 3 1 Variable annuity £m 8,574 % 47 31 13 6 2 1 Note (i) The presentation of the 2005 maturity profile has been altered to a discounted basis from the previously published undiscounted basis to conform to the current year’s presentation. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 161 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued D4: Asian operations (a) Summary balance sheet at 31 December 2006 Assets Intangible assets attributable to shareholders: Goodwill Deferred acquisition costs and acquired in-force value of long-term business contracts Total Other non-investment and non-cash assets Investments of long-term business and other operations: Investment properties Financial investments: Loans and receivables Equity securities and portfolio holdings in unit trusts Debt securities Other investments Deposits Total investments Cash and cash equivalents Total assets Equity and liabilities Equity Shareholders’ equity Liabilities Policyholder liabilities and unallocated surplus of with-profits funds: Insurance contract liabilities Investment contract liabilities with discretionary participation features Investment contract liabilities without discretionary participation features Unallocated surplus of with-profits funds Total Other non-insurance liabilities Total liabilities Total equity and liabilities With-profits business £m Unit-linked assets and liabilities £m – – – 100 30 418 3,102 2,025 35 93 5,703 220 – – – 28 – – 3,179 759 45 82 4,065 41 Other £m 172 612 784 528 11 2006 Total £m 172 612 784 656 41 2005 Total £m 172 566 738 566 39 486 617 2,620 11 236 904 6,898 5,404 91 411 1,105 4,959 4,742 45 374 3,981 13,749 11,264 423 684 504 6,023 4,134 5,716 15,873 13,072 – – 1,437 1,437 1,288 5,317 68 27 88 5,500 523 4,134 – – – 4,134 3,255 – – – 12,706 68 27 88 10,726 80 22 85 3,255 12,889 10,913 – 1,024 1,547 871 6,023 4,134 4,279 14,436 11,784 6,023 4,134 5,716 15,873 13,072 Summary policyholder liabilities (net of reinsurance) and unallocated surplus at 31 December 2006 The policyholder liabilities (net of reinsurance of £8 million (2005: £8 million)) and unallocated surplus shown in the table above reflect the following balances: With-profits and other non-linked business Unallocated surplus of Asian operations Unit-linked business 2006 £m 8,659 88 4,134 2005 £m 8,122 85 2,698 12,881 10,905 162 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements D4: Asian operations continued At 31 December 2006, the policyholder liabilities (net of reinsurance) and unallocated surplus for Asian operations of £12.9 billion (2005: £10.9 billion) comprised the following: 2006 £m Singapore Hong Kong Taiwan Malaysia Japan Other countries Total Asian operations 2005 £m 3,938 2,156 2,050 763 631 1,367 4,355 3,045 2,249 895 572 1,765 12,881 10,905 This amount covers a range of with-profits, unit-linked and non-participating contracts. (b) Products and guarantees The life insurance products offered by the Group’s Asian operations include a range of with-profits and non-participating term, whole life, endowment and unit-linked policies. The Asian operations also offer health, disability, critical illness and accident coverage to supplement its core life products. The terms and conditions of the contracts written by the Asian operations and, in particular, the products’ options and guarantees, vary from territory to territory depending upon local market circumstances. In general terms, the Asian participating products provide savings and protection where the basic sum assured can be enhanced by a profit share (or bonus) from the underlying fund as determined at the discretion of the insurers. The Asian operations’ non-participating term, whole life and endowment products offer savings and/or protection where the benefits are guaranteed or determined by a set of defined market related parameters. Unit-linked products combine savings with protection, the cash value of the policy depends on the value of the underlying unitised funds. Accident and Health (A&H) policies provide mortality or morbidity benefits and include health, disability, critical illness and accident coverage. A&H products are commonly offered as supplements to main life policies but can be sold separately. Subject to local market circumstances and regulatory requirements, the guarantee features described in note D2(b) in respect of UK business broadly apply to similar types of participating contracts written in the Hong Kong branch, Singapore and Malaysia. Participating products have both guaranteed and non-guaranteed elements. Non-participating long-term products are the only ones where the insurer is contractually obliged to provide guarantees on all benefits. Investment-linked products have the lowest level of guarantee if indeed they have any. Product guarantees in Asia can be broadly classified into four main categories; namely premium rate, cash value and interest rate guarantees, policy renewability and convertibility options. The risks on death coverage through premium rate guarantees are low due to appropriate product pricing. Cash value and interest rate guarantees are of three types: • Maturity values Maturity values are guaranteed for non-participating products and on the guaranteed portion of participating products. Declared annual bonuses are also guaranteed once vested. Future bonus rates and cash dividends are not guaranteed on participating products. • Surrender values Surrender values are guaranteed for non-participating products and on the guaranteed portion of participating products. The surrender value of declared reversionary bonuses are also guaranteed once vested. Market value adjustments and surrender penalties are used where the law permits such adjustments in cash values. • Interest rate guarantees It is common in Asia for regulations or market driven demand and competition to provide some form of capital value protection and minimum crediting interest rate guarantees. This would be reflected within the guaranteed maturity and surrender values. The guarantees are borne by shareholders for non-participating and investment-linked (non-investment guarantees only) products. Participating product guarantees are predominantly supported by the segregated life funds and their estates. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 163 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued D4: Asian operations continued The most significant book of non-participating business in the Asian operations is Taiwan’s whole of life contracts. For these contracts there are floor levels of policyholder benefits that accrue at rates set at inception which are set by reference to minimum terms established by local regulation also at the time of inception. These rates do not vary subsequently with market conditions. Under these contracts, the cost of premiums are also fixed at inception based on a number of assumptions at that time, including long- term interest rates, mortality assumptions and expenses. The guaranteed maturity and surrender values reflect the pricing basis. The main variable that determines the amounts payable under the contracts is the duration of the contracts, which is determined by death or surrender. The sensitivity of the IFRS result for these contracts is shown in note (h) below. Whole of life contracts with floor levels of policyholder benefits that accrue at rates set at inception are also written in the Korean life operations, though to a much less significant extent than in Taiwan. The Korean business has non-linked liabilities and linked liabilities at 31 December 2006 of £226 million and £316 million respectively (2005: £193 million and £91 million respectively). The business is much less sensitive to returns than Taiwan with the higher proportion of linked and health business. The other area of note in respect of guarantees is the Japanese business where pricing rates are higher than current bond yields. Lapse risk is a feature in that policyholders could potentially surrender their policies on guaranteed terms if interest rates significantly increased leaving the potential for losses if bond values had depreciated significantly. However, the business is matched to a relatively short realistic liability duration. The method for determining liabilities of insurance contracts for UK GAAP, and hence IFRS, purposes for some Asian operations is based on US GAAP principles and this method applies to contracts with cash value and interest rate guarantees. Following standard US GAAP procedure, premium deficiency reserve calculations are performed each year to establish whether the carrying values of the liabilities are insufficient. On the US GAAP basis the calculations are deterministic, that is to say based off a single set of projections, and expected long-term rates of return are applied. (c) Exposure to market risk The Asian operations sell with-profits and unit-linked policies and, although the with-profits business generally has a lower terminal bonus element than in the UK, the investment portfolio still contains a proportion of equities and, to a lesser extent, property. Non-participating business is largely backed by debt securities or deposits. With the principal exception of Taiwan’s whole of life policy book, as described in note (h) below, the exposure to market risk of the Group arising from its Asian operations is at modest levels. This arises from the fact that the Asian operations have a balanced portfolio of with-profits, unit-linked and other types of business. (d) Process for setting assumptions and determining liabilities The future policyholder benefit provisions for Asian businesses in the Group’s IFRS accounts and previously under the MSB, are determined in accordance with methods prescribed by local GAAP adjusted to comply, where necessary, with UK GAAP. For Asian operations in countries where local GAAP is not well established and in which the business written is primarily non-participating and linked business, US GAAP is used as the most appropriate reporting basis. Of the more significant Asian operations, this basis is applied in Taiwan, Japan and Vietnam. The future policyholder benefit provisions for non-linked business are determined under FAS 60 using the net level premium method, with an allowance for surrenders, maintenance and claims expenses. Rates of interest used in establishing the policyholder benefit provisions vary by operation depending on the circumstances attaching to each block of business. For the traditional business in Taiwan, the economic scenarios used to calculate the IFRS results reflect the assumption of a phased progression of bond yields from current rates to long-term expected rates. The projections assume that the current bond yields of around two per cent (2005: two per cent) trend towards 5.5 per cent (2005: 5.5 per cent) at 31 December 2013 (2005: 2012). (e) Reinsurance The Asian businesses cede only minor amounts of business outside the Group with immaterial effects on reported profit. During 2006, reinsurance premiums for externally ceded business were £47 million (2005: £37 million) and the reinsurance assets were £8 million (2005: £8 million) in aggregate. (f) Effect of changes in bases and assumptions used to measure insurance assets and liabilities 2006 There are no changes of assumptions that had a material impact on the 2006 results of Asian operations. 164 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements D4: Asian operations continued 2005 The 2005 results for Asian operations are affected in two significant ways for changes of basis or assumption. For the Singapore life business, under the basis applied previously for 2004 and earlier, liabilities of non-participating business were determined on a net premium basis using prescribed interest rates such that a very high degree of prudence resulted. This basis has been replaced under the Singapore risk-based capital framework, with one that, although still including provisions for adverse deviation, more accurately estimates the liability. This resulted in a change of estimate and reduction in the liability of £73 million. The second item reflects the application of liability adequacy testing for the Taiwan life business which has resulted in a write-off of deferred acquisition costs of £21 million in 2005. The assumptions for future investment returns for Taiwan are described in note (d) above. The loss reflects the reduction in 2005 in the expected yields over the trending period to the assumed long-term rate of 5.5 per cent for Taiwanese government bonds. Consistent with the application of US GAAP for Taiwanese insurance contracts under IFRS 4, this write-off resulted from a premium deficiency as defined under paragraphs 35-37 of SFAS 60, ‘Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises’ (SFAS 60), and a resulting unlocking of actuarial assumptions in accordance with paragraph 21 of SFAS 60. Under the standard liability adequacy testing required by SFAS 60, the net amount for the present value of future payments for benefits and claims less present value of future premiums, determined using revised assumptions based on actual and anticipated experience, i.e. the best estimate amount, has been compared against the balance sheet liability for policy benefits less unamortised acquisition costs. There were no other changes of assumptions that had a material impact on the 2005 results of Asian operations. (g) Amount, timing and uncertainty of future cash flows from insurance contracts At 31 December 2006, the EEV basis value of in-force business of the Asian operations, after taking account of the cost of encumbered capital and the cost of the time value of financial options and guarantees was £1,628 million (2005: £1,226 million). The most significant businesses in Asia are in Hong Kong, Malaysia, Singapore and Taiwan. These businesses account for 75 per cent (2005: 77 per cent) of the total value of business in force for the Asian operations. These EEV basis in-force values have been determined after applying the principles of valuation described in section D1 and the following key assumptions for the four most significant businesses. Hong Kong* Malaysia Singapore Taiwan *Hong Kong business is predominantly US dollar denominated. **Cash rates are used in setting the risk discount rates. 2006 Expected long-term rate of Government bond yield % inflation % 2.25 3.0 1.75 2.25 4.7 7.0 4.5 5.5 Risk discount rate (in-force business)** % 6.8 9.2 6.9 9.3 2005 Expected long-term rate of inflation % 2.25 3.0 1.75 2.25 Risk discount rate (in-force business)** % 6.15 9.0 6.8 9.4 Government bond yield % 4.8 7.0 4.5 5.5 The most significant equity holdings in Asian operations are in Hong Kong, Singapore and Malaysia. The arithmetic average equity return assumptions for these three territories at 31 December 2006 were 8.7 per cent, 9.3 per cent and 12.8 per cent respectively (2005: 8.6 per cent, 9.3 per cent and 12.8 per cent respectively). For Taiwan the same assumptions are applied as under IFRS (see note (d) above). Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 165 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued D4: Asian operations continued The sensitivity of the value of in-force business and net worth to changes in key assumptions is as follows: Economic assumptions: Discount rates – 1% increase Interest rates (including consequential changes for assumed investment returns for all assets classes, market values of debt securities and all risk discount rates): – 1% increase – 1% decrease Equity/Property yields – 1% rise Equity/Property market values – 10% fall Non-economic assumptions: Maintenance expenses – 10% decrease Lapse rates – 10% decrease Mortality and morbidity – 5% decrease in base rates (i.e. increased longevity) 2006 £m 2005 £m (271) (236) 42 (115) 154 (99) 45 93 77 49 (126) 136 (75) 45 87 69 In addition to these disclosures, for Asian operations as a whole it should be noted that the cash flows of the Taiwan life business are particularly sensitive to projected rates of investment return (as described in note (h)(ii) below). (h) Sensitivity of IFRS basis profit and equity to changes that have a material effect (i) Currency translation Consistent with the Group’s accounting policies, the profits of the Asian operations are translated at average exchange rates and shareholders’ equity at the closing rate for the reporting period. For 2006, the rates for the most significant operations are given in note I9. A 10 per cent increase in these rates and those of other Asian operations would have reduced reported profit before tax attributable to shareholders and shareholders’ equity, excluding goodwill attributable to Asian operations, by £33 million (2005: £23 million) and £116 million (2005: £101 million) respectively. (ii) Other sensitivities With-profits business Similar principles to those explained for UK with-profits business apply to profit emergence for the Asian with-profits business. Correspondingly, the profit emergence reflects bonus declaration and is relatively insensitive to period by period fluctuations in insurance risk or interest rate movements. Unit-linked business As for the UK insurance operations, the profits and shareholders’ equity related to the Asian operations is primarily driven by charges related to invested funds. For the Asian operations, substantially all of the contracts are classified as insurance contracts under IFRS 4, i.e. containing significant insurance risk. The sensitivity of profits and equity to changes in insurance risk is minor and, to interest rate risk, not material. Other non-participating business The principal other non-participating business of Asian operations is the traditional whole of life business written in Taiwan. The in-force business of the Taiwan life operation includes traditional whole of life policies where the premium rates have been set by the regulator at different points for the industry as a whole. Premium rates were set to give a guaranteed minimum sum assured on death and a guaranteed surrender value on early surrender based on prevailing interest rates at the time of policy issue. Premium rates also included allowance for mortality and expenses. The required rates of guarantee have fallen over time as interest rates have reduced from a high of eight per cent to current levels of around two per cent. The current low level of bond rates in Taiwan gives rise to a negative spread against the majority of these policies. The current cash cost of funding in-force negative spread in Taiwan is around £40 million a year. The profits attaching to these contracts are particularly affected by the rates of return earned, and estimated to be earned, on the assets held to cover liabilities and on future investment income and contract cash flows. Under IFRS, the insurance contract liabilities of the Taiwan business are determined on the US GAAP basis as applied previously under UK GAAP. Under this basis, the policy liabilities are calculated on sets of assumptions, which are locked in at the point of policy inception, and a deferred acquisition cost is held in the balance sheet. The adequacy of the insurance contract liabilities is tested by reference to best estimates of expected investment returns on policy cash flows and reinvested income. The assumed earned rates are used to discount the future cash flows. The assumed earned rates consist of a long-term best estimate determined by consideration of long-term market conditions and rates assumed to be earned in the trending period. For 2005, it was projected that rates of return for Taiwanese bond yields would trend from the then current levels of some two per cent to 5.5 per cent by 31 December 2012. For 2006, it has been assumed that the long-term bond rate will be attained one year later, i.e. by 31 December 2013. 166 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements D4: Asian operations continued The liability adequacy test results are sensitive to the attainment of the trended rates during the trending period. Based on the current asset mix, margins in other contracts that are used in the assessment of the liability adequacy tests and currently assumed future rates of return, if interest rates were to remain at current levels in 2007 and the target date for attainment of the long-term bond yield deferred to 31 December 2014, the premium reserve, net of deferred acquisition costs, would be broadly sufficient. If interest rates were to remain at current levels in 2008 with a further one year delay in the progression period, then some level of write-off of deferred acquisition costs may be necessary. However, the amount of the charge based on current in-force business, which is estimated at £70-90 million, is sensitive to the previously mentioned variables. Furthermore, the actual amount of any write-off would be affected by the impact of new business written between 31 December 2006 and the future reporting dates to the extent that the business is taken into account as part of the liability adequacy testing calculations for the portfolio of contracts. The adequacy of the liability is also sensitive to the level of the projected long-term rate. The current long-term assumption of 5.5 per cent has been determined on a prudent best estimate basis by reference to detailed assessments of the financial dynamics of the Taiwanese economy. In the event that the rate applied was altered, the carrying value of the deferred acquisition costs and policyholder liabilities would potentially be affected. At 31 December 2006, if the assumed long-term bond yield applied had been reduced by 0.5 per cent from 5.5 per cent to 5.0 per cent and continued to apply the same progression period to 31 December 2013, by assuming bond yields increase from current levels in equal annual instalments to the long-term rate, the premium reserve, net of deferred acquisition costs, would have been insufficient and there would have been a charge of some £60 million to the income statement. The impact of reducing the long-term rate by a further 0.5 per cent to 4.5 per cent would have increased this charge by some £160 million. The primary reason for the lower level of charge for the initial 0.5 per cent reduction is the current level of margins in the liability adequacy calculation. The effects of additional 0.5 per cent reductions in the assumed long-term rate below 4.5 per cent would be of a similar or slightly higher level to the £160 million noted previously. The effects of changes in any one year reflect the combination of the short-term and long-term factors described above. For the Korean and Japanese life business exposures described in note (b) above, the results are comparatively unaffected by changes of assumption. The accounts basis value of liabilities for both operations are of a similar order of magnitude to those that apply for the purposes of Group solvency calculations under the Financial Conglomerates Directive (FCD). (i) Duration of liabilities The Group uses cash flow projections of expected benefit payments as part of the determination of the value of in-force business when preparing EEV basis results. The maturity profile of the cash flows, taking account of expected future premiums and investment returns, is as follows: 2006 £m 2005 £m Policyholder liabilities Expected maturity: 0 to 5 years 5 to 10 years 10 to 15 years 15 to 20 years 20 to 25 years Over 25 years 12,801 10,828 % 22 20 16 13 10 19 % 23 25 19 12 8 13 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 167 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued D5: Capital position statement for life assurance businesses (a) Summary statement The Group’s capital position for life assurance businesses with reconciliations to shareholders’ equity is shown below. Available capital for each fund or group of companies is determined by reference to local regulation at 31 December 2006 and 2005. Other UK life assurance Total PAC subsidiaries and funds (note ii) £m WPSF with-profits fund £m (note i) £m Asian life assurance Jackson subsidiaries £m £m Total life assurance operations £m M&G £m Egg £m Parent company and shareholders’ equity of other subsidiaries and funds £m Group total £m – – – – – – – – – – 612 – 612 700 2,656 – 2,656 – 1,176 111 1,287 – 4,444 230 111 1,153 4,555 1,383 – 700 292 (1,519) 3,447 1,341 77 – 292 (1,442) 4,788 700 – – 1,312 2,656 1,287 5,255 1,383 292 (1,442) 5,488 31 December 2006 Group shareholders’ equity Held outside long-term funds: Net assets Goodwill Total Held in long-term funds (note iii) Total Group shareholders’ equity Adjustments to regulatory basis Unallocated surplus of with-profits SAIF £m – – – – – funds (note v) – 13,511 13,511 Shareholders’ share of realistic liabilities – (4,000) (4,000) Deferred acquisition costs of – – – – 88 13,599 (4,000) – non-participating business and goodwill not recognised for regulatory reporting purposes Jackson surplus notes (note iv) Adjustment from IAS 19 basis pension surplus attributable to WPSF to pension liability for regulatory purposes (note vii) Inadmissible assets of WPSF Other adjustments to restate these amounts to a regulatory basis (with SAIF and the WPSF on a Peak 2 realistic basis) (note v) Total adjustments Total available capital resources of life assurance businesses on local regulatory bases (5) – (26) – (31) – (146) (1,712) 127 – (673) – (2,562) 127 – – 5 0 (244) (256) (244) (256) – – – – – – (244) (256) (297) (292) (263) 1,012 (136) 321 8,688 8,688 (409) (573) (721) 6,985 0 8,688 8,688 903 2,083 566 12,240 168 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements D5: Capital position statement for life assurance businesses continued 31 December 2006 Policyholder liabilities With-profits liabilities of UK regulated with-profits funds: Insurance contracts Investment contracts (with discretionary participating features) Total Other liabilities: Insurance contracts: With-profits liabilities of non-UK regulated funds Unit-linked, including variable annuity Other life assurance business Investment contracts without discretionary participation features (principally unit-linked and similar contracts in the UK and GIC liabilities of Jackson) (note vi) Other UK Total PAC subsidiaries and funds (note ii) £m WPSF with-profits fund £m note (i) £m SAIF £m Asian life assurance Jackson subsidiaries £m £m Total life assurance operations £m 13,162 31,925 45,087 737 27,928 28,665 13,899 59,853 73,752 – – – – – – – – 2,659 47,746 – – 68 28,733 2,727 76,479 – 2,658 2,658 – 2,039 7,766 11,367 2,039 231 12,245 12,476 12,955 18,817 4,134 25,306 3,255 47,503 – 12 12 11,441 1,562 27 13,042 Total 231 14,296 14,527 32,162 31,746 10,074 88,509 Total policyholder liabilities shown in the consolidated balance sheet 14,130 74,149 88,279 32,162 31,746 12,801 164,988 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 169 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued D5: Capital position statement for life assurance businesses continued Other UK life assurance Total PAC subsidiaries and funds (note ii) £m WPSF with-profits fund (note i) £m £m Asian life assurance Jackson subsidiaries £m £m Total life assurance operations £m M&G £m Egg £m Parent company and shareholders’ equity of other subsidiaries and funds £m Group total £m – – – – – – – – – – 640 – 640 558 1,198 2,899 – 2,899 – 2,899 1,034 111 1,145 – 1,145 4,573 111 4,684 558 245 1,153 1,398 – 5,242 1,398 303 – 303 – 303 (1,826) 77 (1,749) – 3,295 1,341 4,636 558 (1,749) 5,194 SAIF £m – – – – – 31 December 2005 Group shareholders’ equity Held outside long-term funds: Net assets Goodwill Total Held in long-term funds (note iii) Total Group shareholders’ equity Adjustments to regulatory basis Unallocated surplus of with-profits funds (note v) Shareholders’ share of realistic liabilities – Deferred acquisition costs of – 11,245 (3,473) 11,245 (3,473) – – – – 85 – 11,330 (3,473) non-participating business and goodwill not recognised for regulatory reporting purposes Jackson surplus notes (note iv) Part of IAS 19 basis pension deficit attributable to WPSF not recognised for regulatory purposes (note vii) Inadmissible assets of WPSF Other adjustments to restate these amounts to a regulatory basis (with SAIF and the WPSF on a Peak 2 realistic basis) (note v) Total adjustments Total available capital resources of life assurance businesses on local regulatory bases (6) – (29) – (35) – (168) – (1,624) 145 (619) – (2,446) 145 – – 6 0 211 (20) 211 (20) – – – – – – 211 (20) 45 51 7,979 7,979 (271) (439) 837 (41) 576 (642) (575) 6,323 0 7,979 7,979 759 2,257 570 11,565 170 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements D5: Capital position statement for life assurance businesses continued 31 December 2005 Policyholder liabilities With-profits liabilities of UK regulated with-profits funds: Insurance contracts Investment contracts (with discretionary participating features) Total Other liabilities: Insurance contracts: With-profits liabilities of non-UK regulated funds Unit-linked, including variable annuity Other life assurance business Investment contracts without discretionary participation features (principally unit-linked and similar contracts in the UK and GIC liabilities of Jackson) (note vi) Other UK Total PAC subsidiaries and funds (note ii) £m WPSF with-profits fund (note i) £m £m SAIF £m Asian life assurance Jackson subsidiaries £m £m Total life assurance operations £m 13,043 32,557 45,600 751 25,692 26,443 13,794 58,249 72,043 – – – – – – – – – – 2,053 47,653 80 26,523 2,133 74,176 – 2,492 2,492 – 968 2,125 12,810 2,125 13,778 7,629 10,099 8,574 21,905 2,698 3,483 21,026 49,265 – – – 10,502 1,502 22 12,026 Total 968 14,935 15,903 28,230 31,981 8,695 84,809 Total policyholder liabilities shown in the consolidated balance sheet 14,762 73,184 87,946 28,230 31,981 10,828 158,985 Notes (i) WPSF unallocated surplus includes amounts related to the Hong Kong branch. Policyholder liabilities of the Hong Kong branch are included in the amounts of Asian life assurance subsidiaries. (ii) Excluding PAC shareholders’ funds that are included in ‘parent company and shareholders’ equity of other subsidiaries and funds’. (iii) The term shareholders’ equity held in long-term funds refers to the excess of assets over liabilities attributable to shareholders of funds which are required by law to be maintained with segregated assets and liabilities. (iv) For regulatory purposes the Jackson surplus notes are accounted for as capital. (v) Other adjustments to shareholders’ equity and unallocated surplus include amounts for the value of non-participating business for UK regulated with-profits funds, deferred tax, admissibility and other items measured differently on the regulatory basis. For Jackson the principal reconciling item is deferred tax related to deferred acquisition costs of £599 million (2005: £568 million). (vi) Insurance business accounted for as financial instruments under IAS 39. (vii) In determining the IAS 19 adjustment for the purposes of this table the surplus (deficit) in the Group’s main pension scheme used for the calculation includes amounts for investments in Prudential insurance policies (see note I1). (b) Basis of preparation, capital requirements and management Each of the Group’s long-term business operations is capitalised to a sufficiently strong level for its individual circumstances. Details by the Group’s major operations are shown below. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 171 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued D5: Capital position statement for life assurance businesses continued (i) UK insurance operations PAC WPSF and SAIF In common with other large UK regulated with-profits funds, PAC is required to hold capital equivalent to the greater of their regulatory requirement based on EU directives (i.e. the ‘regulatory peak’) and the new FSA basis calculation of expected liabilities (i.e. the ‘realistic peak’). Available capital of the WPSF and SAIF of £8.7 billion (2005: £8.0 billion) represents the excess of assets over liabilities on the FSA realistic basis. Unlike the previously discussed FRS 27 basis, realistic liabilities on the regulatory basis include the shareholders’ share of future bonuses. These amounts are shown before deduction of the risk capital margin (RCM) which is estimated to be £1.9 billion (2005: £2.4 billion) at 31 December 2006. The FSA’s basis of setting the RCM is to target a level broadly equivalent to a Standard & Poor’s credit rating of BBB and to judge this by ensuring there are sufficient assets to absorb a 1 in 200 year event. The RCM calculation achieves this by setting rules for the determination of margins to cover defined stress changes in asset values and yields for market risk, credit risk and termination risk for with-profits policies. As noted in section D2(d)(ii), PAC has discretion in its management actions in the case of adverse investment conditions. Management actions encompass, but are not confined to, investment allocation decisions, levels of reversionary bonuses, crediting rates and total claim values. To illustrate the flexibility of management actions, rates of regular bonus are determined for each type of policy primarily by targeting them at a prudent proportion of the long-term expected future investment return on the underlying assets. The expected future investment return is reduced as appropriate for each type of policy to allow for items such as expenses, charges, tax and shareholders’ transfers. However, the rates declared may differ by product type, or by date of payment of the premiums or date of issue of the policy, if the accumulated annual bonuses are particularly high or low relative to a prudent proportion of the achieved investment return. When target bonus levels change, the PAC board has regard to the overall financial strength of the long-term fund when determining the length of time over which it will seek to achieve the amended product target bonus level. In normal investment conditions, PAC expects changes to regular bonus rates to be gradual over time and changes are not expected to exceed one per cent per annum over any year. However, discretion is retained as to whether or not a regular bonus is declared each year, and there is no limit on the amount by which regular bonus rates can be changed. As regards smoothing of maturity and death benefits, in normal circumstances PAC does not expect most pay-out values on policies of the same duration to change by more than 10 per cent up or down from one year to the next, although some larger changes may occur to balance pay-out values between different policies. Greater flexibility may be required in certain circumstances, for example following a significant rise or fall in market values (either sudden or over a period of years) and in such situations the PAC board may decide to vary the standard bonus smoothing limits to protect the overall interests of policyholders. For surrender benefits, any substantial fall in the market value of the assets of the with-profits sub-fund would lead to immediate changes in the application of MVRs for accumulating with-profits policies, firstly to increase the size of MVRs already being applied and, secondly, to extend the range of policies for which an MVR is applied. Other UK life assurance subsidiaries and funds The available capital of £903 million (2005: £759 million) reflects the excess of regulatory basis assets over liabilities of the subsidiaries and funds, before deduction of the capital resources requirement of £809 million (2005: £718 million). The capital resources requirement for these companies broadly reflects a formula which, for active funds, equates to a percentage of regulatory reserves plus a percentage of death strains. (ii) Jackson The regulatory framework for Jackson is governed by the requirements of the US NAIC approved risk-based capital standards. Under the requirements life insurance companies report on a formula-based capital standard that they calculate by applying factors to various asset, premium and reserve items. The formula takes into account the risk characteristics of a company, including asset risk, insurance risk, interest rate risk and business risk. The available capital of Jackson shown above of £2,083 million (2005: £2,257 million) reflects US regulatory basis assets less liabilities excluding asset valuation reserves. The asset valuation reserve is designed to provide for future credit-related losses on debt securities and losses on equity investments. Available capital includes the effect of the interest maintenance reserve, which is designed by state regulators to defer recognition of non-credit related realised capital gains and losses and to recognise them rateably in the future. Jackson’s risk-based capital ratio is significantly in excess of regulatory requirements. 172 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements D5: Capital position statement for life assurance businesses continued (iii) Asian operations The available capital shown above of £566 million (2005: £570 million) represents the excess of local regulatory basis assets over liabilities before deduction of required capital of £211 million (2005: £149 million). These amounts have been determined applying the local regulations in each of the operations. At the country level, the businesses in Asia are subject to schemes in the jurisdictions in which they operate. The Hong Kong business branch of PAC and its capital requirements are subsumed within those of the PAC long-term fund. For the other material Asian operations, the details of the basis of determining regulatory capital and regulatory capital requirements are as follows: Singapore A new risk-based regulatory framework was introduced at the start of 2005 to replace the previous framework that used a net premium approach. For participating business, a gross premium reserve, determined using prudent best estimate assumptions and which makes allowance for future bonus, is held. The amount held is subject to a minimum of the higher of the assets attributed to participating business and a gross premium reserve calculated on specified assumptions, but without allowance for future bonus, that include prescribed provisions for adverse deviations (PADs). For non-participating business, gross premium reserves are held. For linked business the value of units is held together with a non-unit reserve calculated in accordance with standard actuarial methodology. From 1 January 2005, capital requirements are determined using a risk-based capital approach. Taiwan Basic policy reserves are determined using a net premium method. Both mortality and interest rates are specified. For more recent issues, the valuation rate of interest has been linked to the prevailing market rate on 10-year government bonds. Solvency capital is determined using a risk-based capital approach. Japan Mathematical reserves for traditional business are determined on a net premium basis using prescribed mortality and interest rates. Interest rates reflect the original pricing assumptions. For linked business the value of units is held together with a non-unit reserve calculated in accordance with standard actuarial methodology. With regard to solvency, the adjusted solvency capital assets of the Company must exceed 200 per cent of the risk related capital requirement value at risk. It is thus a risk-based capital approach. Malaysia Mathematical reserves for traditional business are determined on a modified net premium basis using prescribed mortality and interest rates (no higher than four per cent). For linked business the value of units is held together with a non-unit reserve calculated in accordance with standard actuarial methodology. The capital requirement is determined as four per cent of reserves plus a specified percentage of sums at risk. There is an overriding minimum capital requirement of 100 million Malaysian Ringgits. (iv) Group capital requirements In addition to the requirements at individual company level, FSA requirements under the FCD apply additional prudential requirements for the Group as a whole. Discussion of the Group’s estimated FCD position at 31 December 2006 is provided in the operating and financial review section of the Group’s 2006 Annual Report. (c) Movements in total available capital Total available capital for the Group’s life assurance operations has changed during 2006 as follows: Available capital at 31 December 2005 Changes in assumptions Changes in management policy Changes in regulatory requirements New business and other factors Available capital at 31 December 2006 WPSF (note i) £m 7,979 61 – – 648 8,688 Other UK subsidiaries and funds (note iv) £m SAIF (note ii) £m – – – – – – 759 (3) – 80 67 903 Jackson (note iii) £m 2,257 – – – (174) 2,083 Asian life assurance subsidiaries £m 570 (2) – – (2) Group total £m 11,565 56 – 80 539 566 12,240 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 173 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued D5: Capital position statement for life assurance businesses continued Detail on the movement for 2005 is as follows: Available capital at 31 December 2004 Changes: WPSF (note i) SAIF (note ii) Jackson (note iii) Other Available capital at 31 December 2005 2005 £m 9,006 2,615 (677) 461 160 2,559 11,565 Notes (i) WPSF The £648 million increase in available capital in 2006 for new business and other factors incorporates the effects of the strong investment returns in 2006 and the improved outlook for future investment returns. The increase in available capital in 2005, shown in the format as previously published, arises as follows: Investment return, net of tax and investment management expenses Decrease in inadmissible assets Decrease in cost of guarantees Decrease in cost of bonus smoothing Increase in the value of PAL and non-profit business Other 2005 £m 1,329 309 547 195 212 23 2,615 (ii) SAIF The decrease of £677 million in 2005 reflects the impact of FSA actuarial guidance note GN 45 as explained in note D2(f). (iii) Jackson The decrease of £174 million in 2006 reflects an underlying increase of £100 million (applying the 2006 year end exchange rate of 1.96) and £274 million of exchange translation loss. The increase of £461 million in 2005 reflects an underlying increase of £252 million (applying the 2005 year end exchange rate of 1.72) and £209 million of exchange translation gain. (iv) Other UK life assurance subsidiaries and funds The increase in available capital in 2006 from changes in regulatory requirements of £80 million is primarily due to regulatory changes for UK regulated shareholder-backed non-participating business from the FSA’s policy statement PS06/14 confirmed in December 2006. The changes allow liabilities for this business to incorporate more economic realism. Additional details are shown in note D2. The effect from the changes in assumptions of valuation interest rates on insurance liabilities is broadly matched by the corresponding effect on assets leaving no significant impact on the available capital. (d) Transferability of available capital For PAC and all other UK long-term insurers, long-term business assets and liabilities must, by law, be maintained in funds separate from those for the assets and liabilities attributable to non-life insurance business or to shareholders. Only the ‘established surplus’ – the excess of assets over liabilities in the long-term fund determined through a formal valuation – may be transferred so as to be available for other purposes. Distributions from the with-profits sub-fund to shareholders reflect the shareholders’ one-ninth share of the cost of declared policyholders’ bonuses. Accordingly, the excess of assets over liabilities of the PAC long-term fund is retained within that company. The retention of the capital enables it to support with-profits and other business of the fund by, for example, providing the benefits associated with smoothing and guarantees. It also provides investment flexibility for the fund’s assets by meeting the regulatory capital requirements that demonstrate solvency and by absorbing the costs of significant events or fundamental changes in its long-term business without affecting the bonus and investment policies. P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V For other UK long-term business subsidiaries, the amounts retained within the companies are at levels which provide an appropriate level of capital strength in excess of the regulatory minimum. For Jackson, capital retention is maintained at a level consistent with an appropriate rating by Standard & Poor’s. Currently Jackson is rated AA. Jackson can pay dividends on its capital stock only out of earned surplus unless prior regulatory approval is obtained. Furthermore, dividends which exceed the greater of 10 per cent of Jackson’s statutory surplus or statutory net gain from operations for the prior year require prior regulatory approval. 174 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements D5: Capital position statement for life assurance businesses continued For Asian subsidiaries, the amounts retained within the companies are at levels that provide an appropriate level of capital strength in excess of the local regulatory minimum. For ring-fenced with-profits funds, the excess of assets over liabilities is retained with distribution tied to the shareholders’ share of bonuses through declaration of actuarially determined surplus. The Singapore and Malaysian businesses may, in general, remit dividends to the UK, provided the statutory insurance fund meets the capital adequacy standard required under local statutory regulations. Available capital of the non-insurance business units is transferable to the life assurance businesses after taking account of an appropriate level of operating capital, based on local regulatory solvency targets, over and above basis liabilities. The economic capital model described in section D1 (concentration of risks) takes into account restrictions on mobility of capital across the Group with capital transfers to and from business units triggered at a solvency level consistent with these targets. The model takes into account restrictions on the availability to the Group of the estate of the various with-profits funds throughout the Group. (e) Sensitivity of liabilities and total capital to changed market conditions and capital management policies Prudential manages its assets, liabilities and capital locally, in accordance with local regulatory requirements and reflecting the different types of liabilities Prudential has in each business. As a result of the diversity of products offered by Prudential and the different regulatory requirements in which it operates, Prudential employs differing methods of asset/liability and capital management, depending on the business concerned. Stochastic modelling of assets and liabilities is undertaken in the UK, Jackson and Asia to assess the economic capital requirements under different confidence intervals and time horizons. In addition, reserve adequacy testing under a range of scenarios and dynamic solvency testing is carried out, including under certain scenarios mandated by the UK, the US and Asian regulators. A stochastic approach models the inter-relationship between asset and liability movements, taking into account asset correlation, management actions and policyholder behaviour under a large number of alternative economic scenarios. These scenarios are projected forward over a period of time, typically 25 years or longer, and the liabilities and solvency position of the fund are calculated in each scenario in each future year. The fund’s policy on management actions, including bonus and investment policy, continue to be set in order that they are consistent with the available capital and the targeted risk of default. The sensitivity of liabilities and other components of total capital vary depending upon the type of business concerned and this conditions the approach to asset/liability management. For example, for businesses that are most sensitive to interest rate changes, such as immediate annuity business, Prudential uses cash flow analysis to create a portfolio of debt securities whose value changes in line with the value of liabilities when interest rates change. This type of analysis helps protect profits from changing interest rates. This type of analysis is used in the UK for annuity business and by Jackson for its interest-sensitive and fixed indexed annuities and stable value products. For businesses that are most sensitive to equity price changes, Prudential uses stochastic modelling and scenario testing to look at the future returns on its investments under different scenarios which best reflect the large diversity in returns that equities can produce. This allows Prudential to devise an investment and with-profits policyholder bonus strategy that, on the model assumptions, allows it to optimise returns to its policyholders and shareholders over time while maintaining appropriate financial strength. Prudential uses this methodology extensively in connection with its UK with-profits business. (f) Intra-group arrangements in respect of SAIF Should the assets of SAIF be inadequate to meet the guaranteed benefit obligations to the policyholders of SAIF, the PAC long-term fund would be liable to cover any such deficiency. Due to the quality and diversity of the assets in SAIF and the ability of SAIF to revise guaranteed benefits in the event of an asset shortfall, the directors believe that the probability of either the PAC long-term fund or the Group’s shareholders’ funds, under their obligation to maintain the capital position of long-term funds generally, having to contribute to SAIF is remote. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 175 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued E: Banking operations The Group undertakes banking operations almost wholly through its subsidiary, Egg Banking plc. Financial information in respect of Egg Banking plc, together with amounts in respect of its former parent Egg plc and its associate IfOnline, have been included in this note. Note I6 shows details of the purchase of the minority interests in Egg plc in 2006. Note I8 includes details of the agreement in January 2007 to sell Egg Banking plc and its subsidiaries. The Group has presented the income statement and balance sheet for banking operations in a format that demonstrates the characteristics and principal operations specific to a bank. The format is different from that of the Group consolidated income statement and balance sheet; however, total (loss) profit for the year and net assets remain the same. To understand how the amounts presented from banking operations are consolidated in the Group financial statements, refer to the primary segmental information for the income statement in note F1 and the primary segmental information for the balance sheet in note B5. E1: Income statement for banking operations The (loss) profit included in the Group consolidated income statement in respect of banking operations is as follows: Interest income Interest expense Net interest income Fee and commission income Fee and commission expense Other operating income Operating income General administrative expenses Impairment losses on loans and cash advances to customers Other operating expenses Operating (loss) profit based on longer-term investment returns before restructuring costs Restructuring costs (part of £50m for Group) Short-term fluctuations in investment returns (Loss) profit before tax Tax attributable to shareholders’ profits (Loss) profit from continuing operations after tax Discontinued operations (net of tax) (Loss) profit for the year Note E5 F6 2006 £m 783 (453) 330 153 (23) 8 468 (192) (384) (37) (145) (12) 7 (150) 45 (105) – (105) 2005 £m 893 (581) 312 223 (23) 16 528 (216) (241) (27) 44 – – 44 1 45 3 48 Of the (loss) profit for the year in 2006 and 2005, a loss of £2 million and a profit of £9 million, respectively, are attributable to minority interests in Egg. Discontinued operations above relate to Egg France and Funds Direct and have been treated as discontinued operations in the Group’s consolidated income statement. For further information on discontinued operations, see note F6. 176 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements E2: Balance sheet for banking operations Assets, liabilities and shareholders’ funds included in the Group consolidated balance sheet in respect of banking operations are as follows: 2006 £m Assets Cash and balances with central banks Loans and advances to banks Securities purchased under agreement to resell Loans and advances to customers Investment securities Derivative financial instruments Other assets Total assets Liabilities Deposits by banks Customer accounts Debt securities issued Derivative financial instruments Other liabilities Subordinated liabilities Total liabilities Equity Shareholders’ equity Minority interests Total equity Total equity and liabilities E3: Risk management overview Egg offers banking and credit card products and intermediated services. Through its normal operations, Egg is exposed to a number of risks, the most significant of which are credit, operational, liquidity, market and currency risk. The overall responsibility for risk management and the risk appetite of Egg is set by the Egg Board and responsibility for managing these risks resides with the Egg Executive Committee. The exposure to specific risks is monitored by the Executive Committee through separate committees: the retail credit committee is responsible for retail credit risk, the wholesale credit committee is responsible for wholesale credit risk, the operational risk committee is responsible for operational risk and the asset and liability committee (ALCO) is responsible for liquidity, market and currency risk. Egg uses financial instruments including derivatives for the purpose of supporting the strategic and operational business activities and to reduce and eliminate the risk of loss arising from changes in interest rates and foreign exchange rates. Surplus retail and wholesale liabilities are invested in debt securities, including certificates of deposits, government gilts and other high investment grade assets. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 177 2005 £m 7 718 200 7,430 2,117 50 230 6 903 – 6,193 1,976 78 342 9,498 10,752 2,220 5,554 599 154 228 451 2,452 5,830 1,404 77 160 451 9,206 10,374 292 – 292 303 75 378 9,498 10,752 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued E4: Maturities of assets and liabilities and liquidity risk Liquidity risk is defined for Egg as not having sufficient financial resources available to meet its obligations as they fall due or if such resources can only be secured at excessive cost. Egg uses various methods including predictions of daily cash positions to monitor and manage liquidity risk. Maturity mismatches between lending and funding are managed within internal risk policy limits. It ensures that it holds sufficient assets, which are immediately realisable into cash without significant exposure to market risk or costs, to cover a realistic estimate of retail funds that could be withdrawn. While a significant proportion of retail savings balances are on instant access terms, in practice the majority of such funds represent a relatively stable and consistent funding base for Egg. The matching and controlled mismatching of the maturities and interest rates of assets and liabilities is fundamental to the management of a bank. It is unusual for banks ever to be completely matched since business transacted is often of uncertain terms and of different types. The following table analyses the assets and liabilities of Egg into relevant maturity groupings based on the remaining period at the balance sheet date to the contractual maturity date. P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I At 31 December 2006 Assets Cash and balances with central banks Loans and advances to banks Loans and advances to customers Investment securities Derivative financial instruments Other assets Total assets Liabilities Deposits by banks Customer accounts Debt securities issued Derivative financial instruments Other liabilities Subordinated liabilities Total liabilities Net liquidity gap At 31 December 2005 Assets Cash and balances with central banks Loans and advances to banks Securities purchased under agreement to resell Loans and advances to customers Investment securities Derivative financial instruments Other assets P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Total assets Liabilities Deposits by banks Customer accounts Debt securities issued Derivative financial instruments Other liabilities Subordinated liabilities Total liabilities Net liquidity gap 178 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Up to 1 month £m 6 876 1 466 61 68 1,478 18 5,427 – 56 117 – 5,618 From 1 month to 3 months £m From 3 months to 1 year £m From 1 year to 5 years £m – – 2,725 696 – 159 3,580 – 3 – – 68 – 71 – – 42 176 17 41 276 516 68 553 – 43 – 1,180 – 2 1,338 266 – 74 1,680 1,686 56 46 98 – – 1,886 5 years and over £m – 25 2,087 372 – – 2,484 – – – – – 451 451 (4,140) 3,509 (904) (206) 2,033 Up to 1 month £m From 1 month to 3 months £m From 3 months to 1 year £m From 1 year to 5 years £m 7 636 200 – 157 – 3 1,003 157 5,667 – 77 8 – 5,909 – 50 – 3,343 439 – 4 3,836 – 13 3 – 34 – 50 – – – 40 633 50 91 814 – 110 798 – 118 – 1,026 – 5 – 1,421 352 – 125 1,903 2,295 40 603 – – – 2,938 5 years and over £m – 27 – 2,626 536 – 7 3,196 – – – – – 451 451 Total £m 6 903 6,193 1,976 78 342 9,498 2,220 5,554 599 154 228 451 9,206 292 Total £m 7 718 200 7,430 2,117 50 230 10,752 2,452 5,830 1,404 77 160 451 10,374 (4,906) 3,786 (212) (1,035) 2,745 378 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements E5: Losses on loans and advances The following table details the movements in the allowance for losses on loans and advances to customers held by Egg in 2006 and 2005. The aggregate loss on loans at the end of the year and the charge during the year have been included in the consolidated financial statements. 2006 £m Balance at the beginning of the year Amounts written off New and additional provisions Transition adjustment to reflect adoption of IAS 39 at 1 January 2005 Balance at the end of the year E6: Market risk 335 (201) 384 – 518 2005 £m 250 (161) 241 5 335 Interest rate risk The primary market risk to which Egg is exposed is interest rate risk. Interest rate risk arises in Egg as a result of fixed rate, variable rate and non-interest bearing assets and liabilities. Exposure to interest rate movements arises when there is a mismatch between interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities. The composition of interest rate risk is closely monitored and managed on a day-to-day basis by the treasury function where professional expertise and systems exist to control it. This is primarily done via asset and liability models that look at the sensitivity of earnings to movements in interest rates to measure overall exposure which may then be hedged in accordance with the policy limits set by the ALCO. For the purpose of reducing interest rate risk, Egg uses a number of derivative instruments such as interest rate swaps and forward rate agreements (see note G3). Financial assets and liabilities not held at fair value through profit and loss and the weighted average effective interest rate for those balances are provided below: 2006 £m 2005 £m Assets Debt securities available-for-sale* Loans and receivables Liabilities Banking customer accounts Core structural borrowings of shareholder-financed operations Operational borrowings attributable to shareholder-financed operations 1,935 7,096 9,031 5,554 451 2,819 8,824 5.3% 9.0% 4.9% 6.2% 5.4% 2,046 8,148 10,194 5,830 451 3,856 10,137 4.6% 7.5% 4.3% 8.5% 4.5% *Egg has also classified £41 million (2005: £71 million) of debt securities as fair value through profit and loss. See note G2 for further information on interest rate risk. Currency risk The risks arising from assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are managed by a separate treasury function within Egg and within agreed limits set by the ALCO. During the year, cash flows generated by the foreign currency assets and liabilities are hedged by using derivative contracts to manage exposure to exchange rate fluctuations. At 31 December 2006, Egg held £357 million of assets and £1,751 million of liabilities with foreign currency exposure (2005: £539 million and £2,640 million respectively). Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 179 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued E7: Credit risk Egg takes on exposure to credit risk, which is the risk that a counterparty will be unable to pay amounts in full when due. To limit this risk, Egg places limits on the amount of risk accepted in relation to a particular borrower, groups of borrowers, and to particular geographical segments. The acceptable risk levels are monitored regularly and reviewed where appropriate. The following table identifies the geographical concentrations of credit risk, stated in terms of total assets and off-balance sheet items, held by Egg at 31 December 2006 and 2005: 2006 £m 2005 £m UK Rest of Europe Other Total* 18,132 244 243 18,840 399 380 18,619 19,619 *This includes £9,475 million (2005: £9,104 million) of off-balance sheet items, which mainly relate to unutilised credit limits on credit cards. The following is a breakdown of the credit risk borne by Egg for financial assets and off-balance sheet items at 31 December 2006 and 2005: Loans and advances to banks Securities purchased under agreement to resell Investment securities Loans and advances to customers Allowances for impairment losses on loans and advances to customers Fair value of derivative assets Off-balance sheet items (including unutilised credit limits on credit cards) Total credit risk net of allowances and provisions 2006 £m 903 – 1,970 6,711 (518) 78 9,475 2005 £m 718 200 2,117 7,765 (335) 50 9,104 18,619 19,619 At 31 December 2006, Egg had certain credit-related commitments in the form of unused credit limits on credit cards of £9,458 million (2005: £9,061 million) and pre-approved but unused borrowing limits on mortgages and personal loans of £8 million and £9 million respectively (2005: £14 million and £29 million respectively) which are included in off-balance sheet items above. Egg is potentially exposed to a loss totalling these amounts, but it is unlikely that such a loss would arise as these credit facilities were granted only on the basis of the customers having achieved certain credit standards. Additionally, it is unlikely, should all these customers utilise their credit or borrowing limits, that all of them would default on their debt entirely. Egg holds significant concentrations of credit risk with other financial institutions. At 31 December 2006, this was estimated at £8.7 billion (2005: £10.9 billion) of which £3.9 billion (2005: £5.7 billion) related to derivative financial instruments and £1.8 billion (2005: £2.3 billion) to credit default swaps. Egg also has significant credit exposure in asset-backed security products which totalled approximately £403 million at 31 December 2006 (2005: £496 million). With regard to loans and advances to customers, Egg has significant concentrations of credit risk in respect of its unsecured lending on credit cards, personal loans and mortgage lending secured on property in the UK. Assets pledged as collateral and securitisation Egg enters into securities lending arrangements, including repurchase agreements and over-the-counter derivative transactions as part of normal operating activities. Assets are pledged as collateral to support these activities. Collateral in respect of repurchase agreements was £nil and £5.2 million at 31 December 2006 and 2005, respectively. Collateral in respect of over-the-counter derivative transactions was £29.3 million and £30.9 million at 31 December 2006 and 2005, respectively. See note G4 where amounts relating to Egg have been included in the disclosure of these transactions on a Group basis. For further information on Egg’s securitisation of credit card receivables, see note G4. 180 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements F: Income statement notes F1: Segmental information The Group’s primary and secondary segments are described in detail in note B5. Primary segment information The segment results for the years ended 31 December 2006 and 2005 are as follows: Revenue Long-term business Banking Broker-dealer and fund management Unallocated corporate Intra group revenue eliminated on consolidation Total revenue, net of reinsurance per income statement Charges (before income tax attributable to policyholders and unallocated surplus of long-term insurance funds) Long-term business, including post-tax transfers to unallocated surplus of with-profits funds Banking Broker-dealer and fund management Unallocated corporate Intra group charges eliminated on consolidation Total charges per income statement Segment results – revenue less charges (continuing operations) Long-term business Banking Broker-dealer and fund management Unallocated corporate Profit before tax* Tax attributable to policyholders’ returns Profit before tax attributable to shareholders Tax attributable to shareholders’ profits Profit from continuing operations after tax Segment results – discontinued operations Banking Profit for the year 2006 £m 2005 £m 34,197 914 1,080 38 (284) 39,296 1,115 895 98 (279) 35,945 41,125 (32,162) (1,064) (797) (135) 284 (36,997) (1,071) (741) (450) 279 (33,874) (38,980) 2,035 (150) 283 (97) 2,071 (849) 1,222 (347) 875 2,299 44 154 (352) 2,145 (1,147) 998 (241) 757 – 875 3 760 *Profit before tax represents income net of post-tax transfers to unallocated surplus of with-profits funds, before tax attributable to policyholders and unallocated surplus of with-profits funds, unit-linked policies and shareholders’ profits. Within segment results above, the share of post-tax profit of associates that are equity accounted for of £1 million (2005: £nil) is allocated to the banking segment. In its capacity as fund manager to fellow Prudential plc subsidiaries, M&G earns fees for investment management and related services. These services are charged at appropriate arm’s length prices, typically priced as a percentage of funds under management. Total charges include £12,130 million (2005: £12,745 million) of non-cash expenses other than depreciation and amortisation mainly relating to changes in technical reserves and pension actuarial and other gains and losses. The majority of this amount is borne by the long-term business segment. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 181 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued F1: Segmental information continued Secondary segment information Although the Company is UK registered, the Group manages its business on a global basis. The operations are based in three main geographical areas: UK, US and Asia. Revenue UK US Asia Intra group revenue Total revenue per income statement F2: Revenue Long-term business premiums Insurance contract premiums Investment contracts with discretionary participation feature premiums Inwards reinsurance premiums Less: reinsurance premiums ceded Earned premiums, net of reinsurance Realised and unrealised gains and losses on securities at fair value through profit and loss Realised losses on available-for-sale securities, previously recognised directly in equity Interest (note i) Dividends Other investment income Investment income Fee income from investment contract business, fund management, banking and broker-dealer services Income from consolidated venture investments of the PAC with-profits funds Other income Total revenue Note (i) Interest income is calculated on the effective interest rate method for all financial assets that are not at fair value through profit and loss. F3: Acquisition costs and other operating expenditure Acquisition costs (note i) Staff and pension costs (see note I1) Administrative and operating costs (note ii) Total acquisition costs and other operating expenditure 2006 £m 2005 £m 22,126 8,562 5,541 (284) 30,688 6,912 3,804 (279) 35,945 41,125 2006 £m 2005 £m 13,805 1,249 1,103 (171) 13,583 1,366 276 (197) 15,986 15,028 6,887 (7) 6,609 3,666 749 14,640 (22) 5,896 2,731 768 17,904 24,013 1,024 1,031 2,055 926 1,158 2,084 35,945 41,125 2006 £m 1,238 723 3,282 5,243 2005 £m 1,413 991 3,148 5,552 Notes (i) Acquisition costs in 2006 comprise amounts related to insurance contracts of £1,165 million (2005: £1,307 million), and investment contracts and investment management contracts of £73 million (2005: £106 million). These costs include amortisation of £299 million (2005: £392 million) and £6 million (2005: £9 million) respectively. (ii) Administrative and operating costs include total depreciation and amortisation expense amounting to £516 million (2005: £541 million). Of this amount, £305 million (2005: £401 million) relates to amortisation of deferred acquisition costs of insurance contracts and investment management contracts, which is primarily borne by the long-term business segment. Of the remainder of the depreciation and amortisation charge of £211 million (2005: £140 million), £156 million (2005: £101 million) relates to long-term business, £44 million (2005: £28 million) to banking, £8 million (2005: £8 million) to fund management and £3 million (2005: £3 million) to central companies. 182 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements F4: Finance costs: interest on core structural borrowings of shareholder-financed operations Finance costs consist of £177 million (2005: £175 million) interest on core debt of the parent company and related finance subsidiaries and Jackson surplus notes and of £33 million (2005: £33 million) on Egg subordinated debt. P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s F5: Tax (a) Total tax expense by nature of expense An analysis of the total tax expense of continuing operations recognised in the income statement by nature of expense (benefit) is as follows: 2006 £m A 2005 £m B Current tax expense: Corporation tax Adjustments in respect of prior years Benefit from a previously unrecognised tax loss, tax credit or temporary difference from a prior period Total current tax Deferred tax arising from: Origination and reversal of temporary differences Benefit from a previously unrecognised tax loss, tax credit or temporary difference from a prior period Write-down or reversal of a previous write-down of a deferred tax asset Total deferred tax Total tax expense The total tax expense arises as follows: Current tax expense: UK Foreign Deferred tax expense: UK Foreign Total The total deferred tax expense arises as follows: Unrealised gains and losses on investments Short-term timing differences Capital allowances Balances relating to investment and insurance contracts Unused tax losses Deferred tax expense 645 (38) – 607 556 33 – 589 722 (209) (2) 511 870 5 2 877 1,196 1,388 2006 £m 334 273 607 319 270 589 2005 £m 339 172 511 780 97 877 1,196 1,388 2006 £m 236 156 4 198 (5) 589 2005 £m 599 263 13 3 (1) 877 In 2006, a deferred tax credit of £41 million (2005: £93 million) has been taken directly to reserves. When this amount is taken with the deferred tax expense shown above, the result is an increase of £548 million in the Group’s net deferred tax liability (2005: £784 million). In 2006, there is no tax relating to discontinued operations (2005: £nil) (see note F6). C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 183 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued F5: Tax continued (b) Reconciliation of effective tax rate The total tax expense is attributable to shareholders and policyholders as summarised in the income statement. (i) Summary of pre-tax profit and tax charge The income statement includes the following items: Profit before tax Tax attributable to policyholders’ returns Profit before tax attributable to shareholders Tax attributable to shareholders’ profits: Tax expense Less: tax attributable to policyholders’ returns Tax attributable to shareholders’ profits Profit from continuing operations after tax 2006 £m 2,071 (849) 1,222 2005 £m 2,145 (1,147) 998 (1,196) 849 (1,388) 1,147 (347) 875 (241) 757 (ii) Overview For the purposes of explaining the relationship between tax expense and accounting profit, it is appropriate to consider the sources of profit and tax by reference to those that are attributable to shareholders and policyholders, as follows: Profit before tax Taxation charge: Expected tax rate Expected tax charge Variance from expected tax charge (note v(ii)) Actual tax charge Average effective tax rate 2006 2005 Attributable to Attributable to policyholders* £m shareholders £m Total £m Attributable to shareholders £m Attributable to policyholders* £m Total £m 1,222 849 2,071 998 1,147 2,145 31% (374) 27 (347) 28% 100% (849) – (849) 100% 59% (1,223) 27 (1,196) 58% 35% (353) 112 (241) 24% 100% (1,147) – (1,147) 100% 70% (1,500) 112 (1,388) 65% *For the column entitled ‘Attributable to policyholders’, the profit before tax represents income, net of post-tax transfers to unallocated surplus of with-profits funds, before tax attributable to policyholders and unallocated surplus of with-profits funds and unit-linked policies. Due to the requirements of the financial reporting standards IAS 1 and IAS 12, the profit before tax and tax charge reflect the aggregate of amounts that are attributable to shareholders and policyholders. Profit before tax comprises profit attributable to shareholders and pre-tax profit attributable to policyholders of linked and with-profits funds and unallocated surplus of with-profits funds. The total tax charge for linked and with-profits business includes tax expense on unit-linked and with-profits funds attributable to policyholders, the unallocated surplus of with-profits funds and the shareholders’ profits. This feature arises from the basis of taxation applied to life and pension business, principally in the UK, but with similar bases applying in certain Asian operations, and is explained in note (iii) below. P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Furthermore, the basis of preparation of Prudential’s financial statements incorporates the additional feature that, as permitted under IFRS 4, the residual equity of the Group’s with-profits funds, i.e. unallocated surplus, is recorded as a liability with transfers to and from that liability reflected in pre-tax profits. This gives rise to anomalous effective tax rates for profits attributable to policyholders (as described in note (iv) below). In meeting the reconciliation requirements set out in paragraph 81(c) of IAS 12, the presentation shown in this disclosure note seeks to ensure that the explanation of the relationship between tax expense and accounting profit draw properly the distinction between the elements of the profit and tax charge that are attributable to policyholders and shareholders as explained below in notes (iv) and (v), respectively. The shareholder elements are the components of the profit and tax charge that are of most direct relevance to investors, and it is this aspect that the IAS 12 requirement is seeking to explain for companies that do not need to account for both with-profits and unit-linked funds, where tax is borne by the Company on the policyholders’ behalf and which is not contemplated by IFRS requirements. 184 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements F5: Tax continued (iii) Basis of taxation for UK life and pension business Different rules apply under UK tax law for taxing pension business and life insurance business and there are detailed rules for apportioning the investment return and profits of the fund between the types of business. The investment return referrable to pension business, and some other less significant classes of business, is exempt from taxation, but tax is charged on the profit that shareholders derive from writing such business at the corporate rate of tax. The rules for taxing life insurance business are more complex. Initially, the UK regime seeks to tax the regulatory basis investment return less management expenses (I-E) on this business as it arises. However, in determining the actual tax charge, a calculation of the shareholder profits for taxation purposes from writing life insurance business also has to be made and compared with the I-E profit. If the shareholder profit is higher than the I-E amount, then relief for expenses in the I-E calculation has to be restricted until the I-E profit equals the shareholder profit. If on the other hand, the I-E profit is the greater, then an amount equal to the shareholder profit is taxed at the corporate rate of tax, with the remainder of the I-E profit being taxed at the lower policyholder rate of tax. The purpose of this approach is to ensure that the Company is always as a minimum taxed on the profit, as defined for taxation purposes by reference to the Company’s regulatory returns (rather than IFRS basis results), that it has earned. The shareholders’ portion of the long-term business is taxed at the shareholders’ rate, with the remaining portion taxed at rates applicable to the policyholders. It is to be noted that the calculations described are determined using data from the regulatory basis returns rather than the IFRS basis results. The differences between the regulatory and accounting bases are significant and complex. (iv) Profits attributable to policyholders and related tax As noted above, it is necessary under IFRS requirements to include the total tax charge of the Company (both policyholder and shareholder elements) in the tax charge disclosed in the income statement. For with-profits business, total pre-tax profits reflect the aggregate of profits attributable to policyholders and shareholders. However, amounts attributable to the equity of with-profits funds are carried in the liability for unallocated surplus. Also, as described in note (iii), UK with-profits business is taxed on a basis that affects policyholders’ unallocated surplus of with-profits funds and shareholders. For the PAC with-profits sub-fund, transfers to and from unallocated surplus are recorded in the income statement, so that after charging the total tax borne by the fund, the net balance reflects the statutory transfer from the fund for the year. The statutory transfer represents 10 per cent of the actuarially determined surplus for the year that is attributable to shareholders. For SAIF similar transfers are made. However, in the case of SAIF, a net nil balance is derived, reflecting the lack of shareholder interest in the financial performance of the fund (other than through investment management arrangements). The accounting anomaly that arises under IFRS is that due to the fact that the net of tax profit attributable to with-profits policyholders is zero, the Company’s presentation of pre-tax profit attributable to policyholders reflects an amount that is the mirror image of the tax charge attributable to policyholders. For unit-linked business, pre-tax profits also reflect the aggregate of profits attributable to policyholders and shareholders. The pre-tax profits attributable to policyholders represent fees earned that are used to pay tax borne by the Company on policyholders’ behalf. The net of tax profit attributable to policyholders for unit-linked business is thus zero. The combined effect of these features is such that providing a reconciliation of the tax charge attributable to policyholders to an expected charge based on the standard corporate rate of tax on IFRS basis profits attributable to policyholders is not relevant. In summary, for accounting purposes, in all cases and for all reporting periods, the apparent effective rate for profit attributable to policyholders and unallocated surplus is 100 per cent. However, it is to be noted that the 100 per cent rate does not reflect a rate paid on the profits attributable to policyholders. It instead reflects the basis of accounting for unallocated surplus coupled with the distinction made for performance reporting between sources of profit attributable to shareholders, policyholders and unallocated surplus and IFRS requirements in respect of reporting of all pre-tax profits and all tax charges irrespective of policyholder or shareholder economic interest. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 185 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V UK insurance operations £m 469 (43) 0 426 30% 30% 30% 30% Jackson £m 398 53 0 451 35% 35% 35% 35% (141) 13 (139) (19) 0 0 (128) (158) 23 (4) 0 19 5 3 0 8 (118) 9 (134) (16) 0 0 (109) (150) Asian long-term business operations £m Other operations £m 175 134 0 309 25% 25% 25% 25% (44) (33) 0 (77) (10) 5 0 (5) (54) (28) 0 (82) Total £m 893 162 167 1,222 31% 28% 30% 31% (279) (45) (50) (374) 22 5 0 27 (257) (40) (50) (347) 29% 28% (149) 18 167 36 30% 30% 30% 30% 45 (6) (50) (11) 4 1 0 5 49 (5) (50) (6) 33% 17% 25% 26% 34% 33% 31% 27% P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued F5: Tax continued (v) Reconciliation of tax charge on profits attributable to shareholders 2006 Profit before tax attributable to shareholders: Operating profit based on longer-term investment returns (note iii) Short-term fluctuations in investment returns Shareholders’ share of actuarial and other gains and losses on defined benefit pension schemes Total Expected tax rate (note i): Operating profit based on longer-term investment returns (note iii) Short-term fluctuations in investment returns Shareholders’ share of actuarial and other gains and losses on defined benefit pension schemes Total Expected tax charge based on expected tax rates: Operating profit based on longer-term investment returns (note iii) Short-term fluctuations in investment returns Shareholders’ share of actuarial and other gains and losses on defined benefit pension schemes Total Variance from expected tax charge (note ii): Operating profit based on longer-term investment returns (note iii) Short-term fluctuations in investment returns Shareholders’ share of actuarial and other gains and losses on defined benefit pension schemes Total Actual tax charge: Operating profit based on longer-term investment returns (note iii) Short-term fluctuations in investment returns Shareholders’ share of actuarial and other gains and losses on defined benefit pension schemes Total Actual tax rate: operating profit : total 186 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements F5: Tax continued 2005 Profit before tax attributable to shareholders: Operating profit based on longer-term investment returns (note iii) Goodwill impairment charge Short-term fluctuations in investment returns Shareholders’ share of actuarial and other gains and losses on defined benefit pension schemes Total Expected tax rate (note i): Operating profit based on longer-term investment returns (note iii) Goodwill impairment charge Short-term fluctuations in investment returns Shareholders’ share of actuarial and other gains and losses on defined benefit pension schemes Total Expected tax charge based on expected tax rates: Operating profit based on longer-term investment returns (note iii) Goodwill impairment charge Short-term fluctuations in investment returns Shareholders’ share of actuarial and other gains and losses on defined benefit pension schemes Total Variance from expected tax charge (note ii): Operating profit based on longer-term investment returns (note iii) Goodwill impairment charge Short-term fluctuations in investment returns Shareholders’ share of actuarial and other gains and losses on defined benefit pension schemes Total Actual tax charge: Operating profit based on longer-term investment returns (note iii) Goodwill impairment charge Short-term fluctuations in investment returns Shareholders’ share of actuarial and other gains and losses on defined benefit pension schemes Total Actual tax rate: operating profit : total UK insurance operations £m 400 – 36 (20) 416 30% – 30% 30% 30% Jackson £m 348 – 178 0 526 35% – 35% 35% 35% (120) – (11) (122) – (62) 6 0 (125) (184) 3 – (5) (1) (3) (1) – 9 0 8 (117) – (16) (123) – (53) 5 0 (128) (176) Asian long-term business operations £m Other operations £m 175 – 32 3 210 26% – 26% 0% 26% (46) – (8) 0 (54) (17) – 9 0 (8) (63) – 1 0 (62) 34 (120) (35) (33) (154) 30% 0% 30% 30% 6% (10) 0 10 10 10 127 0 (12) 0 115 117 0 (2) 10 125 29% 31% 35% 33% 36% 30% (344)% (81)% Total £m 957 (120) 211 (50) 998 31% 0% 34% 32% 35% (298) 0 (71) 16 (353) 112 0 1 (1) 112 (186) 0 (70) 15 (241) 19% 24% Notes (i) Expected tax rates for profit attributable to shareholders Expected tax rates shown in the table above reflect the corporate tax rates generally applied to taxable profits of the relevant country jurisdictions. For Asian operations the expected tax rates reflect the corporate tax rate weighted by reference to the source of profits of the operations contributing to the aggregate business result. In 2005, the expected tax rate on total profits of 35 per cent was due to the inclusion of a goodwill impairment charge of £120 million which is not allowable for tax. In 2006, no goodwill impairment charge has been booked, and the expected tax rate on total profits of 31 per cent is lower in part due to this, and additionally due to the Asian long-term business (which is subject to lower tax rates than the UK and US) being a greater proportion of Group results. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 187 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued F5: Tax continued Notes continued (ii) Variances from expected tax charge for results attributable to shareholders For 2006, the principal variances arise from differences between the standard corporation tax rate and actual rates due to a number of factors, including: (a) The tax credit arising from relief for excess expenses in respect of the shareholder-backed protection business. (b) Prior year adjustments arising from routine revisions of tax returns. For 2005, the principal variances arise from differences between the standard corporation tax rate and actual rates for ‘other’ operations. This is due to a number of factors including: (a) The settlement of outstanding issues with HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) at amounts below those previously provided. The settlements related to a range of issues affecting both shareholder and policyholder taxes. Many of the issues had been in dispute for several years. The principal issues resolved were as follows: Firstly, HMRC had disputed the deductibility of commissions paid on credit life (protection) insurance. Prudential’s treatment of the commissions was consistent with industry practice. At the start of 2005 it looked likely that the dispute would only be settled through litigation. However, it proved possible to negotiate a settlement acceptable to both parties. Secondly, in 2000 Prudential transferred the insurance business previously carried on by two M&G subsidiaries into another subsidiary, Scottish Amicable Life (SAL). In 2002, Prudential transferred the entire business of SAL (including the old M&G business) into Prudential Assurance Company Limited. Both of these transactions were conducted under a statutory framework, which included obtaining High Court approval. The transactions were complex, leading to a difference in views between HMRC and Prudential as to the correct tax treatment of the transactions. These differences were resolved through a negotiated settlement. (b) The tax credit arising from relief for excess expenses in respect of the shareholder-backed protection business. (c) Prior year adjustments arising from routine revisions of tax returns. (d) The benefit from Egg’s previously unused French losses. P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D (iii) For 2006, operating profit based on longer-term investment returns is net of attributable restructuring costs and development expenses. In 2005, operating profit based on longer-term investment returns is net of development expenses. F6: Discontinued operations Profit generated by discontinued operations Revenue Expenses Pre-tax profit on results of discontinued operations Taxation Post-tax profit on results of discontinued operations Post-tax profit from discontinued operations 2006 £m 2005 £m – – – – – – 1 2 3 0 3 3 In the year ended 31 December 2005, discontinued operations comprised of Egg France and Funds Direct, both of which are included within banking operations in the segment analysis. The £3 million post-tax profit reported is comprised of £4 million from the release of surplus provision on the completion of the exit process from France, by Egg, partially offset by £1 million losses incurred by Funds Direct which was sold by Egg in October 2005. For the purposes of the 2006 financial statements, Egg is reported as part of continuing operations. Note I8 provides details of the agreement to sell Egg after the balance sheet date. E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V 188 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements G: Financial assets and liabilities G1: Financial instruments – designation and fair values The Group designates all financial assets as either fair value through profit and loss, available-for-sale, or as loans and receivables. Financial liabilities are designated as either fair value through profit and loss or amortised cost, or for investment contracts with discretionary participation features accounted for under IFRS 4 as described in note A4. P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s 2006 Financial assets Deposits Equity securities and portfolio holdings in unit trusts Debt securities (note i) Loans and receivables Other investments (note ii) Accrued investment income Other debtors 2006 Financial liabilities Banking customer accounts Core structural borrowings of shareholder-financed operations (note iii and note H13) Operational borrowings attributable to shareholder-financed operations (note H13) Borrowings attributable to with-profits funds (note H13) Obligations under funding, securities lending and sale and repurchase agreements Net asset value attributable to unit holders of consolidated unit trust and similar funds Investment contracts with discretionary participation features (note iii) Investment contracts without discretionary participation features Accruals and deferred income Other creditors Other liabilities (including derivatives) 2005 Financial assets Deposits Equity securities and portfolio holdings in unit trusts Debt securities (note i) Loans and receivables Other investments (note ii) Accrued investment income Other debtors Fair value through profit and loss £m Available- for-sale £m Loans and receivables £m – 78,892 59,812 – 5,401 – – – – 21,907 – – – – 7,759 – – 11,573 – 1,900 1,052 Total carrying value £m 7,759 78,892 81,719 11,573 5,401 1,900 1,052 Fair value £m 7,759 78,892 81,719 12,093 5,401 1,900 1,052 144,105 21,907 22,284 188,296 Fair value through profit and loss £m Amortised cost £m Total carrying value £m IFRS 4 £m Fair value £m – – – 553 5,554 3,063 5,609 1,223 – 4,232 – – – – – 5,554 5,554 3,063 3,297 5,609 1,776 5,609 1,798 4,232 4,229 2,476 – 11,480 – – 663 – – 1,562 517 1,398 989 – 28,733 – – – – 2,476 28,733 13,042 517 1,398 1,652 2,476 – 13,035 517 1,398 1,652 15,172 24,147 28,733 68,052 Fair value through profit and loss £m Available- for-sale £m Loans and receivables £m – 71,985 56,814 – 3,879 – – – – 25,657 – – – – 7,627 – – 13,245 – 1,791 1,305 Total carrying value £m 7,627 71,985 82,471 13,245 3,879 1,791 1,305 Fair value £m 7,627 71,985 82,471 14,268 3,879 1,791 1,305 132,678 25,657 23,968 182,303 A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 189 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued G1: Financial instruments – designation and fair values continued 2005 Financial liabilities Banking customer accounts Core structural borrowings of shareholder-financed operations (note iii and note H13) Operational borrowings attributable to shareholder-financed operations (note H13) Borrowings attributable to with-profits funds (note H13) Obligations under funding, securities lending and sale and repurchase agreements Net asset value attributable to unit holders of consolidated unit trust and similar funds Investment contracts with discretionary participation features (note iii) Investment contracts without discretionary participation features Accruals and deferred income Other creditors Other liabilities (including derivatives) Fair value through profit and loss £m Amortised cost £m Total carrying value £m IFRS 4 £m Fair value £m – – – 559 5,830 3,190 6,432 1,339 – 4,529 – – – – – 5,830 5,830 3,190 3,550 6,432 1,898 6,432 1,929 4,529 4,524 965 – 10,524 – – 851 – – 1,502 506 1,478 919 – 26,523 – – – – 965 26,523 12,026 506 1,478 1,770 965 – 12,035 506 1,478 1,770 12,899 25,725 26,523 65,147 Notes (i) As at 31 December 2006, £624 million (2005: £450 million) of convertible bonds were included in debt securities and £279 million (2005: £311 million) were included in borrowings. (ii) See note G3 for details of the derivative assets included. The balance also contains the PAC with-profits fund’s participation in various investment funds and limited liability property partnerships. (iii) It is impractical to determine the fair value of investment contracts with discretionary participation features due to the lack of a reliable basis to measure such features. Determination of fair value The fair values of the Group’s quoted investments are based on current bid prices. If the market for a financial investment of the Group is not active, the Group establishes fair value by using quotations from independent third parties, such as brokers, or by using valuation techniques. The fair value of investments valued using a valuation technique at 31 December 2006 was £4,548 million (31 December 2005: £4,947 million). The valuation techniques include the use of recent arm’s length transactions, reference to other instruments that are substantially the same, discounted cash flow analysis, option adjusted spread models and enterprise valuation and may include a number of assumptions relating to variables such as credit risk and interest rates. Changes in assumptions relating to these variables could positively or negatively impact the reported fair value of these instruments. The fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based upon available market information and judgements about the financial instruments, including estimates of the timing and amount of expected future cash flows and the credit standing of counterparties. Such estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the Group’s entire holdings of a particular financial instrument, nor do they consider the tax impact of the realisation of unrealised gains or losses. In some cases the fair value estimates cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets, nor can the disclosed value be realised in immediate settlement of the financial instrument. The loans and receivables have been shown net of provisions for impairment. The fair value of loans has been estimated from discounted cash flows expected to be received. The rate of discount used was the market rate of interest. The estimated fair value of derivative financial instruments reflects the estimated amount the Group would receive or pay in an arm’s length transaction. This amount is determined using quotations from independent third parties or valued internally using standard market practices. In accordance with the Group’s risk management framework, all internally generated valuations are subject to independent assessment against external counterparties’ valuations. The fair value of borrowings is based on quoted market prices, where available. Refer to section A4 for the determination of fair value for investment contracts without fixed and guaranteed terms (notably UK unit- linked policies). For investment contracts in the US with fixed and guaranteed terms the fair value is determined based on the present value of future cash flows discounted at current interest rates. The fair value of other financial liabilities is determined using discounted cash flows of the amounts expected to be paid. 190 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements G1: Financial instruments – designation and fair values continued Use of valuation techniques Valuation techniques – UK Of the financial investments that are not quoted on active markets, assets with a fair value at 31 December 2006 of £3,959 million (2005: £3,729 million) were held by UK operations. £3,563 million (2005: £3,466 million) of this amount related to assets held by with-profits operations and £396 million (2005: £263 million) related to assets held by the shareholder-backed UK annuity subsidiary Prudential Retirement Income Limited (PRIL). The majority of these assets are private debt securities such as private placements, project finance, asset securitisations and local authority securities. The securities are mainly long-dated and not regularly traded and are valued internally using market standard practices. These practices mainly use matrix pricing, which is based on assessing credit quality of the underlying borrower to derive a suitable discount rate relative to government securities. In accordance with the Group’s Risk Management Framework, all internally generated calculations are subject to independent assessment by the Group’s Fair Value Committees which comprise members who are independent of the fund managers involved in the day-to-day trading in these assets. The total amount of the change in fair value estimation using valuation techniques, including valuation techniques based on assumptions not wholly supported by observable market prices or rates, recognised in the profit and loss account in 2006 was a loss of £63 million (2005: a gain of £82 million) for the with-profits fund investments. Changes in values of assets of the with-profits funds are reflected in policyholder liabilities and unallocated surplus. Due to the liability accounting treatment of unallocated surplus, changes in values of securities held by with-profits funds have no direct effect on the profit or loss or shareholders’ equity. The total amount of the change in fair value estimation using valuation techniques, including those based on assumptions not wholly supported by observable market prices or rates, recognised in the profit and loss account in 2006 and which was attributable to shareholders, was a loss of £12 million (2005: a gain of £11 million) for the PRIL investments. Valuation techniques – US The other financial investments which are not quoted on active markets were assets held by Jackson that had a fair value of £589 million (2005: £1,218 million). The US operations of Prudential had two groups of assets which were valued using valuation techniques – derivatives that are accounted for under IAS 39 on a fair value through profit and loss basis and securities held by the Piedmont trust entity, an 80 per cent Jackson held static trust formed as a result of a securitisation of asset-backed securities in 2003 that are accounted for on an available-for-sale basis. As at 31 December 2006, the fair value of the derivative and Piedmont assets valued using valuation techniques was £184 million and £405 million, respectively (2005: £518 million and £700 million respectively). The majority of the factors entering into the valuation of the derivatives are readily observable in the market and, therefore, are not subject to interpretation in the model. The most significant non-observable factor is the level of implied volatility assumed in the valuation. Significant estimates and judgements are also employed in valuing certain asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities held by the Piedmont trust entity. These valuations may impact reported shareholder profit and loss amounts through the determination of impairment and recovery amounts. While management believes that the estimates and assumptions employed in developing the fair value estimates are reasonable and present management’s best estimate of such values, a reasonable range of values exists with respect to most assumptions utilised in determining these values. As a result of the potentially significant variability in the estimates of the assumptions used in these models, the range of reasonable estimates of the fair value of these securities is significant. Management has obtained broker bids on these securities that represent the value at which the Group could sell the investments, if forced. These bids are not based on full knowledge and hence analysis of the investments, but represent the best estimate of the worst case decline in market value of these securities. The broker bids for these securities at 31 December 2006 totalled £372 million, a difference of £33 million (2005: £514 million, a difference of £186 million). Interest income and expense The interest income on financial assets not at fair value through profit and loss for the year ended 31 December 2006 was £2,775 million (2005: £2,662 million). The interest expense on financial liabilities not at fair value through profit and loss for the year ended 31 December 2006 was £890 million (2005: £893 million). Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 191 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued G2: Market risk Interest rate risk The following table shows an analysis of the classes of financial assets and liabilities with direct exposure to interest rate risk. Each applicable class of the Group’s financial assets or liabilities is analysed between those exposed to fair value interest rate risk, cash flow interest rate risk and those with no direct interest rate risk exposure: Fair value interest rate risk £m Cash flow interest rate risk £m Not directly exposed to interest rate risk £m Total £m 4,872 55,504 4,521 292 2,887 26,215 7,052 2,601 – – – 2,508 7,759 81,719 11,573 5,401 65,189 38,755 2,508 106,452 – 3,063 2,282 1,486 851 1,562 393 5,554 – 3,320 219 3,381 – 379 – – 7 71 – 11,480 880 5,554 3,063 5,609 1,776 4,232 13,042 1,652 9,637 12,853 12,438 34,928 Fair value interest rate risk £m Cash flow interest rate risk £m Not directly exposed to interest rate risk £m 4,531 74,806 4,269 345 3,096 7,665 8,976 1,553 – – – 1,981 Total £m 7,627 82,471 13,245 3,879 83,951 21,290 1,981 107,222 – 3,190 1,638 916 703 723 276 7,446 5,830 – 4,780 883 3,826 779 380 – – 14 99 – 10,524 1,114 5,830 3,190 6,432 1,898 4,529 12,026 1,770 16,478 11,751 35,675 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V 2006 Financial assets Deposits Debt securities Loans and receivables Other investments (including derivatives) Financial liabilities Banking customer accounts Core structural borrowings of shareholder-financed operations Operational borrowings attributable to shareholder-financed operations Borrowings attributable to with-profits funds Obligations under funding, securities lending and sale and repurchase agreements Investment contracts without discretionary participation features Other liabilities (including derivatives) 2005 Financial assets Deposits Debt securities Loans and receivables Other investments (including derivatives) Financial liabilities Banking customer accounts Core structural borrowings of shareholder-financed operations Operational borrowings attributable to shareholder-financed operations Borrowings attributable to with-profits funds Obligations under funding, securities lending and sale and repurchase agreements Investment contracts without discretionary participation features Other liabilities (including derivatives) 192 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements G2: Market risk continued The following table sets out the Group’s commitments to lend funds at a fixed rate: Term to maturity: Less than 1 year 1 to 5 years 5 to 10 years 10 to 15 years 15 to 20 years Over 20 years 2006 2005 Weighted average interest rate % Amount £m – 8.9 6.9 6.7 – 6.5 – 2 55 19 – 7 83 Weighted average interest rate % 11.9 5.4 7.4 7.4 5.3 5.6 Amount £m 16 58 52 27 9 5 167 Of the above commitments £39 million (2005: £104 million) relates to US operations, £9 million (2005: £32 million) relates to the banking operations, £16 million (2005: £31 million) relates to Asian operations and £19 million (2005: £nil) relates to the UK operations. The table below details the effective interest rates for applicable classes of financial assets and liabilities not held at fair value through profit and loss, notably financial assets designated as available-for-sale, loans and receivables and liabilities held at amortised cost: Assets Deposits Debt securities Loans and receivables: Mortgage loans Policy loans Other loans Liabilities Banking customer accounts (note E2) Core structural borrowings of shareholder-financed operations (note H13) Operational borrowings attributable to shareholder-financed operations (note H13) Borrowings attributable to with-profits funds Obligations under funding, stocklending and sale and repurchase agreements Investment contracts without discretionary participation features Other liabilities (including derivatives) 2006 2005 Balance of financial instruments not at fair value through profit and loss £m Range of effective interest rates applicable as at 31 Dec 2006 % Balance of financial instruments not at fair value through profit and loss £m 7,759 21,907 2.4 – 5.4 5.2 – 17.8 4,421 819 6,333 41,239 3.7 – 10.7 3.0 – 8.8 6.7 – 11.0 7,627 25,657 4,928 865 7,452 46,529 Range of effective interest rates applicable as at 31 Dec 2005 % 1.6 – 5.4 4.0 – 8.0 2.3 – 7.6 3.0 – 9.0 4.5 – 10.5 5,554 0.9 – 5.5 5,830 1.6 – 5.0 3,063 5.5 – 9.4 3,191 5.5 – 9.4 5,609 1,223 4,232 1,562 989 22,232 5.9 – 8.2 3.0 – 7.6 2.6 – 6.2 2.0 – 8.2 0.0 – 0.0 6,432 1,339 4,529 1,502 918 23,741 2.2 – 6.5 6.0 – 10.0 2.4 – 8.0 2.0 – 8.2 0.0 – 0.0 For further information on effective interest rates specific to the banking operations, please refer to note E6. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 193 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued G2: Market risk continued In relation to interest rate exposure, the following table sets out the earlier of contractual maturities and repricing dates for applicable classes of financial instruments, excluding investment contracts without discretionary participation features: 2006 Financial assets Deposits Debt securities Loans and receivables Other investments (including derivatives) 1 year or less £m After 1 year to 5 years £m After 5 years to 10 years £m After 10 years to 15 years £m After 15 years to 20 years £m Over 20 years £m No stated maturity £m Total carrying value £m 7,656 3,395 2,905 2,615 33 14,712 2,803 209 19 19,227 3,168 129 – 10,121 743 106 – 8,395 716 5 51 25,333 350 237 – 536 888 2,100 7,759 81,719 11,573 5,401 16,571 17,757 22,543 10,970 9,116 25,971 3,524 106,452 Financial liabilities Banking customer accounts (note E2) Core structural borrowings of 5,498 56 shareholder-financed operations (note H13) 150 248 Operational borrowings attributable to shareholder-financed operations (note H13) 3,135 1,793 Borrowings attributable to with-profits funds (note H13) Obligations under funding, stocklending and sale and repurchase agreements Other liabilities (including derivatives) 33 4,232 1,033 331 – 301 – 250 521 541 – 19 14,081 2,729 1,331 – – 536 313 – 803 160 – 5,554 763 3,063 – 5,609 57 795 1,776 – 125 – 128 4,232 1,652 – 19 – 7 339 1,145 1,686 21,886 2005 Financial assets Deposits Debt securities Loans and receivables Other investments (including derivatives) 1 year or less £m 7,029 3,475 3,495 1,893 After 1 year to 5 years £m After 5 years to 10 years £m After 10 years to 15 years £m After 15 years to 20 years £m Over 20 years £m No stated maturity £m 38 11,857 4,275 189 20 23,162 1,875 83 – 9,610 1,393 17 52 24,754 172 208 488 1,019 836 1,460 Total carrying value £m 7,627 82,471 13,245 3,879 Financial liabilities Banking customer accounts (note E2) Core structural borrowings of shareholder-financed operations (note H13) Operational borrowings attributable to 15,892 16,359 25,140 5,790 – 40 399 – 249 shareholder-financed operations (note H13) 2,440 3,040 – 139 Borrowings attributable to with-profits funds (note H13) Obligations under funding, stocklending and sale and repurchase agreements Other liabilities (including derivatives) 39 4,529 1,096 309 – 256 775 – 71 – – 30 13,894 4,044 1,095 169 11,020 25,186 3,803 107,222 – 857 – – – 68 925 – 820 813 81 – 130 – 5,830 865 3,190 – 6,432 694 1,898 – 119 4,529 1,770 1,844 1,678 23,649 – – – 39 575 – 8,594 1,199 29 9,822 – – Durations of long-term business contracts, including investment contracts, are included in section D. 194 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements G2: Market risk continued Currency risk As at 31 December 2006, the Group held 16 per cent (2005: 18 per cent) and 15 per cent (2005: 21 per cent) of its financial assets and financial liabilities respectively, in currencies, mainly US dollar and Euro, other than the functional currency of the relevant business unit. The financial assets, of which 90 per cent (2005: 86 per cent) are held by the PAC with-profits fund, allow the PAC with-profits fund to obtain exposure to foreign equity markets. The financial liabilities, of which 14 per cent (2005: 22 per cent) are held by the PAC with-profits fund, mainly relate to foreign currency borrowings. The exchange risks inherent in these exposures are mitigated through the use of derivatives, mainly forward currency contracts (note G3 below). The amount of exchange gains recognised in the income statement in 2006, except for those arising on financial instruments measured at fair value through profit and loss, is £73 million (2005: £152 million). This constitutes £107 million (2005: £134 million) gains on Medium- Term Notes (MTN) liabilities and £34 million of net losses (2005: £18 million net gains), mainly arising on investments of the PAC with- profits fund. The gains on MTN liabilities are fully offset by value movements on cross-currency swaps, which are measured at fair value through profit and loss. See also note E3 for details of the market risks faced by the banking business. G3: Derivatives and hedging Derivatives The Group enters into a variety of exchange traded and over-the-counter derivative financial instruments, including futures, options, forward currency contracts and swaps such as interest rate swaps, cross-currency swaps, swaptions and credit default swaps. All over-the-counter derivative transactions are conducted under standardised ISDA (International Swaps and Derivatives Association Inc) master agreements and the Group has collateral agreements between the individual group entities and relevant counterparties in place under each of these market master agreements. The total fair value balances of derivative assets and liabilities as at 31 December 2006 were as follows: 2006 Derivative assets Derivative liabilities 2005 Derivative assets Derivative liabilities UK insurance operations £m 476 (268) 208 UK insurance operations £m 338 (403) (65) US £m 254 (92) 162 US £m 166 (208) (42) Banking operations £m Other operations £m 78 (154) (76) 90 (149) (59) Banking operations £m Other operations £m 50 (77) (27) 86 (163) (77) Total £m 898 (663) 235 Total £m 640 (851) (211) The above derivative assets and derivative liabilities are included in ‘other investments’ and ‘other liabilities’ in the primary statements. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 195 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued G3: Derivatives and hedging continued The notional amount of the derivatives, distinguishing between UK insurance, US, banking and other operations was as follows: As at 31 December 2006 Cross-currency swaps* Equity index call options Swaptions Futures Forwards* Inflation swaps Credit default swaps Single stock options Credit derivatives Put options FTSE swap Total return swaps Interest rate swaps As at 31 December 2005 Cross-currency swaps* Equity index call options Swaptions Futures Forwards* Inflation swaps Credit default swaps Single stock options Put options FTSE swap Total return swaps Interest rate swaps UK insurance operations US Banking operations Notional amount on which future payments are based Notional amount on which future payments are based Notional amount on which future payments are based Asset £m Liability £m Asset £m Liability £m 579 – 1,125 2,306 12,614 1,109 – – – – – 895 2,976 499 – – 2,463 12,465 1,109 – 6 – – – 833 3,388 537 583 13,540 – – – – – – 2,708 – 230 2,407 26 12 11,751 274 – – – – 18 – – 65 1,988 Asset £m 348 – – – 383 – 1,787 – – – 49 – 3,117 Liability £m 360 – – – 376 – – – – – 49 – 3,117 UK insurance operations US Banking operations Notional amount on which future payments are based Notional amount on which future payments are based Notional amount on which future payments are based Asset £m 800 – 1,125 1,621 10,711 1,070 – 83 – – 479 2,790 Liability £m 774 – – 1,239 10,878 1,070 – 18 – – 479 3,302 Asset £m 552 796 9,320 9 – – – – 1,427 – 612 2,367 Liability £m 392 13 14,562 – – – – – – – 120 4,250 Asset £m 941 – – – 743 – 2,256 – – 49 – 2,855 Liability £m 952 – – – 744 – – – – 49 – 2,855 *In addition, the other operations, including the Group Treasury function and the Asian operations, have cross-currency swap assets and liabilities with notional amounts of £754 million (2005: £2,761 million) and £1,743 million (2005: £2,692 million) respectively, forward currency contracts assets and liabilities with notional amounts of £443 million (2005: £501 million) and £63 million (2005: £167 million) respectively, interest rate swaps of £1,856 million (2005: £1,310 million) and £1,856 million (2005: £1,310 million) respectively and inflation swap liabilities with notional amounts of £150 million (2005: £nil). These derivatives are used for efficient portfolio management to obtain cost effective and efficient exposure to various markets in accordance with the Group’s investment strategies and to manage exposure to interest rate, currency, credit and other business risks. See also note D3 for use of derivatives by the Group’s US operations. The Group uses various interest rate derivative instruments such as interest rate swaps to reduce exposure to interest rate volatility. The UK insurance operations use various currency derivatives in order to limit volatility due to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations arising on securities denominated in currencies other than sterling. See also note G2 above. In addition, total return swaps and interest rate swaps are held for efficient portfolio management. As part of the efficient portfolio management of the PAC with-profits fund, the fund may, from time to time, invest in cash-settled forward contracts over Prudential plc shares, which are accounted for consistently with other derivatives. This is in order to avoid a mismatch of the with-profits investment portfolio with the investment benchmarks set for its equity-based investment funds. The contracts will form part of the long-term investments of the with-profits fund. These contracts are subject to a number of limitations for legal and regulatory reasons. 196 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements G3: Derivatives and hedging continued Some of the Group’s products, especially those sold in the US, have certain guarantee features linked to equity indexes. A mismatch between product liabilities and the performance of the underlying assets backing them, exposes the Group to equity index risk. In order to mitigate this risk, the relevant business units purchase swaptions, equity options and futures to match asset performance with liabilities under equity-indexed products. The US operations and some of the UK operations hold large amounts of interest-rate sensitive investments that contain credit risks on which a certain level of defaults is expected. These entities have purchased some swaptions in order to manage the default risk on certain underlying assets and hence reduce the amount of regulatory capital held to support the assets. Egg uses derivative instruments for the purpose of supporting the strategic and operational business activities and reducing and eliminating the risk of loss arising from changes in interest rates and foreign exchange rates. Derivatives are used solely to hedge risk exposures and Egg does not take any trading position in derivatives. For the purpose of reducing interest rate risk, Egg uses a number of derivative instruments, including interest rate swaps and forward agreements. Additionally, swaps are used to provide caps to the funding cost of the credit card product. Egg has also made general use of credit default swaps to manage credit risk without changing the underlying product or investment portfolios. For the purpose of reducing currency risk, Egg uses forward exchange contracts and currency swaps. Hedging The Group has formally assessed and documented the effectiveness of the following hedges: Fair value hedges The Group has a US$1 billion fair value hedge in place which hedges the interest exposure on the US$1 billion, 6.5 per cent perpetual subordinated capital securities. During 2006, the Group entered into a transaction to extend the term of the interest rate swap in this hedging relationship from 30 years to 50 years. In addition, the Group entered into a US$300 million fair value hedge in June 2006 to hedge the interest exposure on its US$300 million, 6.5 per cent perpetual subordinated capital securities. Jackson has had a collar fair value hedge in place since 1 March 2005. This common stock equity collar transaction was entered into to protect the Company’s unrealised gain of US$5.9 million on an equity investment. The hedge expires in March 2008. Cash flow hedges Egg has cash flow hedged certain balance sheet items which are subject to interest rate risk using interest rate and cross currency interest rate swaps, with the effective part of any gain or loss on the swaps recognised directly in equity. As at 31 December 2006, the notional amount of this cash flow hedge was £1,711 million (2005: £2,296 million). The cash flows are periodically updated based on the underlying banking portfolios. The net movement on ineffective positions of cash flow hedges recognised in the income statement in 2006 was a loss of £nil (2005: £0.2 million) Net investment hedges In November 2005, the Group’s US$500 million net investment hedge relating to the currency exposure of the US operations matured. In December 2005, the Group entered into a series of three-month period forward currency transactions which together form a US$2 billion net investment hedge of the currency exposure of the net investments in the US operations. The forward currency contracts were renewed throughout 2006. The forward currency contracts in place at 31 December 2006 expire in March 2007. The Group has designated perpetual subordinated capital securities totalling US$1.55 billion as a net investment hedge to hedge the currency risks related to the net investment in Jackson. The carrying value of the subordinated capital securities was £763 million (2005: £865 million) as at 31 December 2006. The foreign exchange gain of £110 million (2005: loss of £78 million) on translation of the borrowings to pounds sterling at the balance sheet date is recognised in the translation reserve in shareholders’ equity. The net investment hedges were 100 per cent effective. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 197 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued G4: Derecognition, securitisation and collateral Securities lending and reverse repurchase agreements The Group has entered into securities lending (including repurchase agreements) whereby blocks of securities are loaned to third parties, primarily major brokerage firms. The agreements require that amounts between 102 per cent and 105 per cent of the fair value of the loaned securities be held as collateral, depending on the quality of the collateral, calculated on a daily basis. The loaned securities are not removed from the Group’s consolidated balance sheet, rather they are retained within the appropriate investment classification. Collateral typically consists of cash, debt securities, equity securities and letters of credit. At 31 December 2006, the Group had lent £11,418 million (2005: £10,594 million) (of which £7,592 million (2005: £8,250 million) was lent by the PAC with-profits fund) of securities and held collateral under such agreements of £11,814 million (2005: £11,112 million) (of which £7,934 million (2005: £8,657 million) was held by the PAC with-profits fund). At 31 December 2006, the Group had entered into reverse repurchase transactions under which it purchased securities and had taken on the obligation to resell the securities for the purchase price of £1,435 million (2005: £1,214 million), together with accrued interest. Collateral and pledges under derivative transactions At 31 December 2006, the Group had pledged £263 million (2005: £403 million) for liabilities and held collateral of £212 million (2005: £193 million) in respect of over-the-counter derivative transactions. Securitisation During 2006, Egg transferred additional UK credit card receivables to its trust vehicle, Arch (Term) Limited, created in 2002 for the purpose of asset-backed securitisation, bringing the outstanding balance of assets in this vehicle to £2.8 billion (2005: £2.8 billion). The noteholders in securitisations from this vehicle have a proportional interest in each account balance in the trust. As at 31 December 2006, the value of this interest was £2.3 billion (2005: £2.3 billion). This securitisation does not qualify for derecognition under IAS 39 and the total portfolio is, therefore, included in loans and receivables. The funding giving rise to the note-holders interest is included within operational borrowings attributable to shareholder-financed operations. G5: Impairment of financial assets In accordance with the Group’s accounting policy set out in note A4, impairment reviews were performed for available-for-sale securities and loans and receivables. In addition, impairment reviews were undertaken for the reinsurers’ share of policyholder liability provisions. During the year ended 31 December 2006, impairment losses of £416 million (2005: £278 million) were recognised. These were mainly for loans and advances to customers in Egg and available-for-sale securities held by Jackson. Impairment losses recognised on available-for-sale securities amounted to £24 million (2005: £24 million). Of this amount, 76 per cent (2005: 28 per cent) has been recorded on structured asset-backed securities, primarily due to reduced cash flow expectations on such securities that are collateralised by diversified pools of primarily below investment grade securities. 22 per cent (2005: 53 per cent) of the losses related to the impairment of fixed maturity securities of two (2005: five) individual corporate issuers, reflecting deteriorating business outlook of the companies concerned. The impairment losses have been recorded in ‘acquisition costs and other operating expenditure’ in the income statement. In 2006, the Group realised gross losses on sales of available-for-sale securities of £58 million (2005: £29 million). 30 per cent (2005: 38 per cent) of these losses related to the disposal of fixed maturity securities of six (2005: five) individual issuers, which were disposed of to rebalance the portfolio in the US operations. The effect of those reasonably likely changes in the key assumptions underlying the estimates that underpin the assessment of whether impairment has taken place depends on the factors described in note A3. A key indicator of whether such impairment may arise in future, and the potential amounts at risk, is the profile of gross unrealised losses for fixed maturity and equity securities accounted for on an available-for-sale basis by reference to the time periods by which the securities have been held continuously in an unrealised loss position and by reference to the maturity date of the securities concerned. 198 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements G5: Impairment of financial assets continued For 2006, the difference between the carrying value and book cost of equity securities in gross unrealised loss position was £(1) million (2005: £(1) million). The following table shows the amounts of gross unrealised losses for fixed maturity securities classified as available- for-sale under IFRS in an unrealised loss position for the time periods indicated as at 31 December 2006 and 31 December 2005. 2006 Less than 6 months 6 months to 1 year 1 year to 2 years 2 years to 3 years 3 years to 4 years 4 years to 5 years 5 years to 6 years 2005 Less than 6 months 6 months to 1 year 1 year to 2 years 2 years to 3 years 3 years to 4 years 4 years to 5 years 5 years to 6 years Non- investment grade £m Investment grade £m Not rated £m (1) (3) (24) (5) (5) 0 (2) (40) (1) (1) (10) 0 0 0 (1) (13) (14) (10) (135) (9) (35) 0 0 (203) Non- investment grade £m Investment grade £m Not rated £m (17) (8) (8) (6) 0 (3) 0 (42) (10) (9) (5) 0 0 (1) 0 (25) (99) (40) (15) (42) 0 0 0 (196) Total £m (16) (14) (169) (14) (40) 0 (3) (256) Total £m (126) (57) (28) (48) 0 (4) 0 (263) The following table shows the amount of gross unrealised losses for fixed maturity securities classified as available-for-sale under IFRS in an unrealised loss position by maturity date of the securities as at 31 December 2006 and 31 December 2005. 2006 £m 2005 £m Less than 1 year 1 to 5 years 5 to 10 years More than 10 years Mortgage-backed securities and other debt securities Total (1) (29) (113) (51) (62) (256) 0 (23) (126) (41) (73) (263) Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 199 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued H: Other information on balance sheet items H1: Intangible assets attributable to shareholders (a) Goodwill Cost At 1 January Disposals (including, for 2005, goodwill of held for sale venture investment subsidiaries – see note H9) At 31 December Aggregate impairment At 1 January Impairment losses in the year recognised in the profit and loss Write-offs related to disposals and discontinued operations At 31 December Net book amount at 31 December 2006 £m 2005 £m 1,461 – 1,461 1,466 (5) 1,461 (120) – – (120) (5) (120) 5 (120) 1,341 1,341 During 2005, the acquired goodwill of the Japanese life company was tested for impairment and a charge of £120 million was separately disclosed in the consolidated income statement. The charge reflects the slower than expected development of the Japanese life business. Impairment testing Goodwill does not generate cash flows independently of other groups of assets and thus is assigned to cash generating units (CGUs) for the purposes of impairment testing. These CGUs are based upon how management monitors the business and represent the lowest level to which goodwill can be allocated on a reasonable basis. An allocation to CGUs of the Group’s goodwill attributable to shareholders is shown below: 2006 £m 2005 £m M&G Other 1,153 188 1,341 1,153 188 1,341 ‘Other’ represents goodwill amounts allocated across CGUs in Asia and US operations. These goodwill amounts are not individually material. Assessment of whether goodwill may be impaired With the exception of M&G, the goodwill attributable to shareholders in the balance sheet relates to acquired life businesses. The Company routinely compares the aggregate of net asset value and acquired goodwill on an IFRS basis of acquired life business with the value of the business as determined using the EEV methodology, as described in note D1. Any excess of IFRS over EEV carrying value is then compared with EEV basis value of current and projected future new business to determine whether there is any indication that the goodwill in the IFRS balance sheet may be impaired. Goodwill is tested for impairment by comparing the CGUs carrying amount, excluding any goodwill, with its recoverable amount. M&G The recoverable amount for the M&G CGU has been determined by calculating its value in use. This has been calculated by aggregating the present value of future cash flows expected to be derived from the component businesses of M&G (based upon management projections) and its current surplus capital. The discounted cash flow valuation has been based on a three-year plan prepared by M&G, and approved by the directors of Prudential plc, and cash flow projections for later years. As a cross check to the discounted cash flow analysis, a review was undertaken of publicly available information for companies engaged in businesses comparable to the component businesses, including reported market prices for such companies’ shares. In addition, a review was undertaken of publicly available terms of transactions involving companies comparable to the component businesses. In particular, comparison has been made of the valuation multiples implied by the discounted cash flow analysis to current trading multiples of companies comparable to the component businesses, as well as to multiples achieved in precedent transactions. 200 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements H1: Intangible assets attributable to shareholders continued The value in use is particularly sensitive to a number of key assumptions, as follows: (i) The assumed growth rate on forecast cash flows beyond the terminal year of the budget. A growth rate of 2.5 per cent has been used to extrapolate beyond the plan period. (ii) The risk discount rate. Differing discount rates have been applied in accordance with the nature of the individual component businesses. For retail and institutional business a risk discount rate of 12 per cent has been applied. This represents the average implied discount rate for comparable UK listed asset managers calculated by reference to risk-free rates, equity risk premiums of five per cent and an average ‘beta’ factor for relative market risk of comparable UK listed asset managers. A similarly granular approach has been applied for the other component businesses of M&G. (iii) That asset management contracts continue on similar terms. Management believes that any reasonable change in the key assumptions would not cause the carrying amount of M&G to exceed its recoverable amount. Japanese life company As noted above, the entire goodwill relating to the Japanese life operation of £120 million was deemed to be impaired in 2005 following impairment testing carried out. This testing was based on a recoverable amount for the Japanese company that was determined by calculating its value in use based on net present value cash flow projections. Such projections reflected existing business over the expected duration of the contracts and expected new business. A risk discount rate of five per cent was applied to the projected cash flows. On the basis of the results of this exercise, all goodwill held in relation to the Japanese business was written off in 2005. (b) Deferred acquisition costs and acquired in-force value of long-term business contracts attributable to shareholders The recoverable amount for the ventures entities controlled by the Group through PPM Capital has been determined on a portfolio CGU basis by aggregating fair values calculated for each entity less costs to sell these entities. Other intangible assets in the Group consolidated balance sheet attributable to shareholders consist of: Deferred acquisition costs (DAC) related to insurance contracts as classified under IFRS 4 Deferred acquisition costs related to investment management contracts, including life assurance contracts classified as financial instruments and investment management contracts under IFRS 4 Present value of acquired in-force policies for insurance contracts as classified under IFRS 4 Present value of future profits of acquired investment management contracts, including life assurance contracts classified as financial instruments and investment management contracts under IFRS 4 2006 £m 2005 £m 2,315 2,200 110 104 2,425 2,304 66 6 72 92 9 101 Total of deferred acquisition costs and acquired in-force value of long-term business contracts 2,497 2,405 Deferred acquisition costs related to insurance contracts attributable to shareholders The movement in deferred acquisition costs relating to insurance contracts attributable to shareholders is as follows: Deferred acquisition costs at 1 January 2005 Additions Amortisation Impairment Exchange differences Change in shadow DAC Deferred acquisition costs at 31 December 2005 Deferred acquisition costs at 1 January 2006 Additions Amortisation Exchange differences Change in shadow DAC Deferred acquisition costs at 31 December 2006 £m 1,620 495 (388) (21) 173 321 2,200 2,200 623 (299) (290) 81 2,315 In 2005, deferred acquisition costs of £21 million relating to the Taiwanese life assurance operation were impaired. See note D4(f) for further details. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 201 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued H1: Intangible assets attributable to shareholders continued Deferred acquisition costs related to investment management contracts attributable to shareholders Incremental costs associated with the origination of investment management contracts written by the Group’s insurance and fund management businesses are capitalised and amortised as the related revenue is recognised. Deferred acquisition costs related to investment management contracts are all internally generated. Amortisation of this intangible asset is included in the ‘acquisition costs and other operating expenditure’ line in the income statement. At 1 January 2005 Gross amount Accumulated amortisation Net book amount Year ended 31 December 2005 Opening net book amount Additions (through internal development) Amortisation Other charges At 31 December 2005 At 1 January 2006 Gross amount Accumulated amortisation Net book amount Year ended 31 December 2006 Opening net book amount Additions (through internal development) Amortisation Other charges Closing net book amount At 31 December 2006 Gross amount Accumulated amortisation Net book amount £m 80 (5) 75 75 45 (9) (7) 104 118 (14) 104 104 36 (6) (24) 110 130 (20) 110 Present value of acquired in-force business of long-term business contracts attributable to shareholders Prior to the adoption of IFRS 4, the present value of acquired in-force business (PVAIF) was accounted for under UK GAAP. On 1 January 2005, following the adoption of IFRS 4, PVAIF relating to investment contracts without discretionary participation features, which was previously included within long-term business, is removed and replaced by an asset representing the present value of the future profits of the investment management component of these contracts, where applicable. These contracts are accounted for under the provisions of IAS 18. The remainder of the PVAIF balance relates to insurance contracts and is accounted for under UK GAAP as permitted by IFRS 4. The amortisation charge is included in ‘acquisition costs and other operating expenditure’ in the income statement. The present value of future profits of acquired investment management contracts relates to unit-linked contracts acquired as part of the M&G acquisition in 1999. 202 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements H1: Intangible assets attributable to shareholders continued Amortisation is charged to the ‘acquisition costs and other operating expenditure’ line in the income statement over the period of provision of investment management services as those profits emerge. At 1 January 2005 Cost Accumulated amortisation Net book amount Year ended 31 December 2005 Opening net book amount Exchange differences Amortisation charge At 31 December 2005 At 1 January 2006 Cost Accumulated amortisation Net book amount Year ended 31 December 2006 Opening net book amount Exchange differences Amortisation charge Closing net book amount At 31 December 2006 Cost Accumulated amortisation Net book amount Insurance Investment contracts management £m £m 217 (113) 104 104 9 (21) 92 233 (141) 92 92 (4) (22) 66 220 (154) 66 12 0 12 12 0 (3) 9 12 (3) 9 9 0 (3) 6 12 (6) 6 H2: Intangible assets attributable to the PAC with-profits fund (a) Goodwill and other acquired intangible assets in respect of acquired venture fund investment subsidiaries Carrying value at 1 January 2006 Additions Amortisation charge Disposals (including held for sale subsidiaries) At 31 December 2006 Other acquired intangible assets £m 260 139 (41) (115) 243 Goodwill £m 419 336 – (168) 587 Total £m 679 475 (41) (283) 830 In the 2005 financial statements the following details were included: • at 1 January 2005, goodwill in respect of acquired venture fund investment subsidiaries was £784 million; • during 2005, acquisitions amounted to £151 million and disposals (including held for sale subsidiaries) amounted to £328 million; and • at 31 December 2005, the goodwill and other acquired intangible assets in respect of PAC with-profits fund were £607 million and £nil respectively. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 203 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued H2: Intangible assets attributable to the PAC with-profits fund continued In 2006, certain reclassifications were made to goodwill and other acquired intangible assets as explained in note I11. This resulted in the altered opening balances for goodwill and other acquired intangible assets as shown in the table above. All goodwill figures shown above reflect the cost. These have no impairment losses or other write-offs. All goodwill additions relate to the UK and the long-term business segments. Additional details on the acquisitions are provided in note I6. The recoverable amount for the venture fund investment subsidiaries controlled by the Group through PPM Capital has been determined on a portfolio CGU basis by aggregating fair values calculated for each entity less costs to sell these entities. The fair value of each entity is calculated by PPM Capital in accordance with the International Private Equity and Venture Capital Valuation Guidelines which set out industry best practice for determining the fair value of private equity investments. The guidelines require that an enterprise value is calculated for each investment, typically using an appropriate multiple applied to the Company’s maintainable earnings. All amounts relating to financial instruments ranking higher in a liquidation than those controlled by PPM Capital are then deducted from the enterprise value and a marketability discount applied to the result to give a fair value attributable to the instruments controlled by PPM Capital. The marketability discount ranges from 10 per cent to 30 per cent, depending on PPM Capital’s level of control over a realisation process. Management believes that any reasonable change in the key assumptions would not give rise to an impairment charge. (b) Deferred acquisition costs At 1 January Additions Amortisation At 31 December 2006 £m 35 2 (6) 31 2005 £m 33 6 (4) 35 These costs relate to non-participating business written by the PAC with-profits sub-fund. No deferred acquisition costs are established for the participating business. H3: Reinsurers’ share of policyholder liabilities Insurance contract liabilities Claims outstanding The movement on reinsurers’ share of insurance contract liabilities is as follows: At 1 January Amount included in income statement Foreign exchange translation differences At 31 December 2006 £m 878 67 945 2006 £m 1,203 (265) (60) 2005 £m 1,203 75 1,278 2005 £m 919 242 42 878 1,203 204 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements H4: Tax assets and liabilities Assets Of the £404 million (2005: £231 million) current tax recoverable, the majority is expected to be recovered in one year or less. Deferred tax asset Unrealised losses on investments Balances relating to investment and insurance contracts Short-term timing differences Capital allowances Unused deferred tax losses 2006 £m 83 439 472 18 – 1,012 2005 £m 84 317 258 91 5 755 Deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that they are regarded as recoverable, that is to the extent that, on the basis of all available evidence, it can be regarded as more likely than not that there will be suitable taxable profits from which the future reversal of the underlying temporary differences can be deducted. The UK taxation regime applies separate rules to trading and capital profits and losses. The distinction between temporary differences that arise from items of either a capital or trading nature may affect the recognition of deferred tax assets. Accordingly, for the 2006 results and balance sheet position at 31 December 2006, the possible tax benefit of approximately £333 million (2005: £333 million), which may arise from capital losses valued at approximately £1.7 billion (2005: £1.7 billion), is sufficiently uncertain that it has not been recognised. In addition, a potential deferred tax asset of £71 million (2005: £67 million), which may arise from trading losses of approximately £245 million (2005: £237 million), is sufficiently uncertain that it has not been recognised. Liabilities Of the £1,303 million (2005: £962 million) current tax liability, it is not practicable to estimate how much is expected to be settled in one year or less due to the uncertainty over when outstanding issues will be agreed with HM Revenue and Customs. Deferred tax liability Unrealised gains on investments Balances relating to investment and insurance contracts Short-term timing differences Capital allowances 2006 £m 2,346 613 916 7 3,882 2005 £m 1,907 554 536 80 3,077 Unprovided deferred income tax liabilities on temporary differences associated with investment in subsidiaries, associates and interests in joint ventures are considered to be insignificant due to the availability of various UK tax exemptions and reliefs. Discounting Deferred tax asset and liability balances have not been discounted. H5: Accrued investment income and other debtors Accrued investment income Interest receivable Other Other debtors Premiums receivable: From policyholders From intermediaries From reinsurers Other Total 2006 £m 2005 £m 1,331 569 1,900 1,235 556 1,791 200 12 22 818 1,052 2,952 230 10 21 1,044 1,305 3,096 Of the £2,952 million (2005: £3,096 million) of accrued investment income and other debtors, £800 million (2005: £992 million) is expected to be settled after one year or more. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 205 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued H6: Property, plant and equipment Property, plant and equipment comprise Group occupied properties, development property and tangible assets. A reconciliation of the carrying amount of these items from the beginning of the year to the end of the year is as follows: At 1 January 2005 Cost Accumulated depreciation Net book amount Year ended 31 December 2005 Opening net book amount Exchange differences Depreciation charge Additions Arising on acquisition of subsidiaries Disposals Reclassification from held for investment Closing net book amount At 1 January 2006 Cost Accumulated depreciation Net book amount Year ended 31 December 2006 Opening net book amount Exchange differences Depreciation charge Additions Arising on acquisition of subsidiaries Disposals Reclassification from held for investment Closing net book amount At 31 December 2006 Cost Accumulated depreciation Net book amount Group occupied Development property property £m £m 340 (35) 305 305 5 (6) 5 38 (105) – 242 279 (37) 242 242 (8) (6) 4 – (25) – 207 241 (34) 207 135 – 135 135 – – 27 – – 13 175 175 – 175 175 – – 36 – – 268 479 479 – 479 Tangible assets £m 1,094 (567) 527 527 6 (110) 128 44 (102) – 493 Total £m 1,569 (602) 967 967 11 (116) 160 82 (207) 13 910 1,082 (589) 493 1,536 (626) 910 493 (8) (139) 134 40 (73) – 910 (16) (145) 174 40 (98) 268 447 1,133 1,127 (680) 1,847 (714) 447 1,133 Of the above net book amounts, £102 million (2005: £125 million) of Group occupied property and £261 million (2005: £269 million) of tangible assets are attributable to consolidated venture investment subsidiaries of the PAC with-profits fund at 31 December 2006. All additions arising on acquisition of subsidiaries relate to acquisitions of venture investment subsidiaries of the PAC with-profits fund. Capital expenditure: property, plant and equipment by primary segment Long-term business Banking Broker-dealer and fund management Unallocated corporate Capital expenditure: property, plant and equipment by secondary segment UK US Asia 206 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 2006 £m 153 12 6 3 174 2006 £m 134 15 25 174 2005 £m 124 28 6 2 160 2005 £m 117 14 29 160 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements H7: Investment properties Investment properties principally relate to the PAC with-profits fund and are carried at fair value. A reconciliation of the carrying amount of investment properties at the beginning and end of the year is set out below: 2006 £m 2005 £m At 1 January Additions: Resulting from acquisitions Resulting from expenditure capitalised Resulting from acquisitions through business combinations Disposals Net gains from fair value adjustments Net foreign exchange differences Transfers to held for sale assets Transfers to development properties At 31 December The income statement includes the following items in respect of investment properties: Rental income from investment properties Direct operating expenses (including repairs and maintenance expenses) arising from investment properties: That generated rental income during the year That did not generate rental income during the year Total direct operating expenses 13,180 13,303 1,185 51 2 (398) 813 (42) (32) (268) 844 56 22 (1,224) 720 24 (552) (13) 14,491 13,180 2006 £m 744 118 8 126 2005 £m 765 133 7 140 Investment properties of £4,990 million (2005: £4,463 million) are held under finance leases. A reconciliation between the total of future minimum lease payments at the balance sheet date, and their present value is shown below: 2006 £m 2005 £m Future minimum lease payments at 31 December Future finance charges on finance leases Present value of minimum lease payments Future minimum lease payments are due as follows: Less than 1 year 1 to 5 years Over 5 years The present values of these minimum lease payments are: Less than 1 year 1 to 5 years Over 5 years 400 (325) 75 564 (450) 114 4 15 381 400 3 15 57 75 12 23 529 564 11 22 81 114 Contingent rent is that portion of the lease payments that is not fixed in amount but is based on the future value of a factor that changes other than with the passage of time. Contingent rent recognised as an expense in 2006 amounted to £11 million (2005: £21 million). Contingent rents recognised as income in the year amounted to £33 million (2005: £46 million). The Group’s policy is to rent investment properties to tenants through operating leases. Minimum future rentals to be received on non- cancellable operating leases are receivable in the following periods: 2006 £m 2005 £m Less than 1 year 1 to 5 years Over 5 years 658 2,382 6,135 702 2,535 7,005 9,175 10,242 The total minimum future rentals to be received on non-cancellable sub-leases for land and buildings for the year ended 31 December 2006 are £2,651 million (2005: £4,006 million). Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 207 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued H8: Investments in associates and joint ventures Investments in associates The Group had three associates at 31 December 2006 (2005: one) that are accounted for using the equity method. The Group acquired two new associates in 2006, a 30 per cent interest in Apollo Education and Training Organisation Vietnam and a 25 per cent interest in OYO Developments Limited, which are included in the summarised financial information below. IfOnline Group Limited (IfOnline), a company whose principal activity is mortgage intermediation, was held by the Group in both 2006 and 2005. The Group also has investments in associates which meet the IAS 28 criteria for measurement at fair value through profit and loss in accordance with IAS 39. Associates accounted for using the equity method During the year, IfOnline issued further shares to its shareholders which diluted the Group’s holding to 28.8 per cent (2005: 38.6 per cent) of the total issued share capital. Total share capital comprises 29.9 per cent of the ordinary share capital, 96.0 per cent of the preference share capital, a £1 Founder share capital and £1 AN share capital. IfOnline is not a listed investment. Equity accounting is applied based on its reporting period of the year to 30 November and is adjusted for material changes up to 31 December. Accordingly, the information is deemed to cover the same period as that of the Group. A summary of the movements in investments in associates accounted for using the equity method in 2006 and 2005 is set out below: Balance at 1 January 2005 Share of profit for the year after tax Balance at 31 December 2005 Acquisitions Share of profit for the year after tax Balance at 31 December 2006 Share of capital £m Share of reserves £m Share of net assets £m Goodwill £m Total carrying value £m 4 – 4 0 – 4 (6) 0 (6) 0 1 (5) (2) 0 (2) 0 1 (1) 7 – 7 0 – 7 5 0 5 0 1 6 There have been no changes recognised directly in the equity of associates that would also be recognised directly in equity by the Group. The Group’s share of the assets, liabilities, revenues and profit and loss of associates accounted for using the equity method at 31 December 2006 and 2005 is as follows: Financial position Total assets (excluding goodwill) Total liabilities Net assets Results of operations Revenue Profit in the year 2006 £m 2005 £m 4 (5) (1) 3 1 1 (3) (2) 2 0 Associates carried at fair value through profit and loss The Group’s associates that are carried at fair value through profit and loss comprise investments in OEICs, unit trusts, funds holding collateralised debt obligations, property unit trusts, and venture capital investments of the PAC with-profits fund managed by PPM Capital, where the Group has significant influence. These investments are incorporated both in the UK and overseas, and some have year ends which are non-coterminous with that of the Group. In these instances, the investments are recorded at fair value at 31 December 2006 based on valuations or pricing information at that specific date. The aggregate fair value of associates carried at fair value through profit and loss where there are published price quotations is approximately £2 billion (2005: £2 billion) at 31 December 2006. The aggregate assets of these associates are approximately £7 billion (2005: £9 billion). Aggregate liabilities, excluding liabilities to unit holders and shareholders for unit trusts and OEICs, are approximately £3 billion (2005: £3 billion). Fund revenues, with revenue arising in unit trusts and OEICs deemed to constitute the investment return for these vehicles, were approximately £0.4 billion (2005: £2 billion) and net profit in the year, excluding unit trusts and OEICs where all investment returns accrue to unit holders or shareholders respectively, was approximately £0.2 billion (2005: £0.1 billion). 208 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements H8: Investments in associates and joint ventures continued Investments in joint ventures Joint ventures represent activities over which the Group exercises joint control through contractual agreement with one or more parties. The Group’s significant joint ventures, which are accounted for using proportionate consolidation, comprise various joint ventures relating to property investments where the Group has a 50 per cent interest as well as the following interests: Investment ICICI Prudential Life Insurance Company Limited BOCI – Prudential Asset Management Limited PruHealth CITIC Prudential Fund Management Company Limited Prudential ICICI Asset Management Company Limited Prudential BSN Takaful Berhad % held Principal activity Country 26 36 50 33 49 49 Life assurance Pensions Private medical insurance Fund Management Fund Management India China UK China India General and life insurance Malaysia CITIC Prudential Fund Management Company Limited and Prudential ICICI Asset Management Company Limited were new joint ventures in 2005. Prudential ICICI Asset Management Company Limited was previously a subsidiary with an ownership interest of 55 per cent. However, in 2005, the Group sold a six per cent holding resulting in a new interest of 49 per cent. Hence, the Group now accounts for this investment as a joint venture, as there is a contractual agreement to share control. Prudential BSN Takaful Berhad is a new joint venture in 2006. In January 2006, the Group sold its 50 per cent interest in Marlborough Stirling Mortgage Services Limited for £2.9 million. The profit on sale before tax of £1.7 million is included in investment income in the consolidated income statement. The investments noted in the table above have the same accounting year end as the Group, except for Marlborough Stirling Mortgage Services Limited and Prudential ICICI Asset Management Company Limited. Although these two investments have a reporting period of 31 March, 12 months of financial information up to 31 December is recorded. Accordingly, the information is deemed to cover the same period as that of the Group. The summarised financial data for the Group’s share of investments in joint ventures is as follows: Financial position Current assets Non-current assets Total assets Current liabilities Non-current liabilities Total liabilities Net equity Results of operations Revenues Expenses Net loss 2006 £m 91 638 729 (47) (467) (514) 215 265 (273) (8) 2005 £m 233 281 514 (30) (272) (302) 212 156 (161) (5) There are several minor service agreements in place between the joint ventures and the Group. During 2006, the aggregate amount of the transactions was £4 million and the balance outstanding as at 31 December 2006 was £3.2 million. During 2006, ICICI Prudential Life Insurance Company Limited invested its own capital of £1.4 million into the joint venture to fund the operational needs of the business. The joint ventures have no significant contingent liabilities to which the Group is exposed nor does the Group have any significant contingent liabilities in relation to its interest in the joint ventures. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 209 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued H9: Assets and liabilities held for sale Assets and liabilities held for sale comprise investment property and consolidated venture subsidiaries of the PAC with-profits fund. Investment properties are classified as held for sale when contracts have been exchanged but the sale has not been completed at the period end. As at 31 December 2006, one venture subsidiary, Pharmacia Diagnostics, was classified as held for sale. The disposal of this subsidiary was completed on 18 January 2007. There were two venture subsidiaries at 31 December 2005 that were classified as held for sale; Upperpoint Distribution Limited and Taverner Hotel Group Pty Ltd. The sale of these venture subsidiaries was completed in 2006. Gains on disposal of held for sale assets and liabilities are recorded in ‘investment income’ within the income statement. Major classes of assets and liabilities held for sale are as follows: Assets Goodwill Intangible assets Property, plant and equipment Other assets Investment properties Non-current assets held for sale Liabilities Other liabilities Borrowings Non-current liabilities held for sale H10: Cash and cash equivalents 2006 £m 138 112 48 105 60 463 64 323 387 2005 £m 16 – 21 139 552 728 42 104 146 Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash in hand, balances with banks, and certain short-term deposits and debt instruments. Cash and cash equivalents included in the cash flow statement comprise the following balance sheet amounts: 2006 £m 2005 £m Cash Cash equivalents Total cash and cash equivalents 3,908 1,163 5,071 2,380 1,206 3,586 Cash and cash equivalents held in the parent company and finance subsidiaries are considered to be available for use by the Group. These funds amount to £437 million and £263 million in 2006 and 2005, respectively. The remaining amounts, generally not available for use by the Group, predominantly consist of cash and cash equivalents held for the benefit of policyholders and loans and advances to banks held by Egg. H11: Shareholders’ equity: share capital, share premium and reserves The authorised share capital of the Company is £220 million (2005: £170 million) (divided into 4,000,000,000 (2005: 3,000,000,000) ordinary shares of 5 pence each and 2,000,000,000 sterling preference shares of 1 pence each) and US$20 million (divided into 2,000,000,000 US dollar preference shares of 1 cent each) and Euros 20 million (divided into 2,000,000,000 Euro preference shares of 1 cent each). None of the preference shares have been issued. A summary of the ordinary shares in issue is set out below: Share capital and share premium Ordinary share capital: 2,444m (2005: 2,387m) Shares issued Share premium Reserves Retained earnings Translation reserve Available-for-sale and hedging reserves Total shareholders’ equity 210 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 2006 £m 2005 £m 122 1,822 3,640 (125) 29 5,488 119 1,564 3,236 173 102 5,194 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements H11: Shareholders’ equity: share capital, share premium and reserves continued Share capital and share premium 2005 Issued shares of 5p each fully paid: At the beginning of the year Transition adjustment on adoption of IAS 32, IAS 39 and IFRS 4 Shares issued under share option schemes Shares issued in lieu of cash dividends Transfer to retained earnings in respect of shares issued in lieu of cash dividends At end of the year 2006 Issued shares of 5p each fully paid: At the beginning of the year Shares issued under share option schemes Shares issued in lieu of cash dividends Shares issued in respect of acquisition of Egg minority interests Transfer to retained earnings in respect of shares issued in lieu of cash dividends At end of the year Number of ordinary shares Share capital £m Share premium £m 2,375,393,020 2,375,393,020 745,478 10,645,768 2,386,784,266 2,386,784,266 2,953,552 12,940,993 41,633,614 – 2,444,312,425 119 119 – – 119 119 – 1 2 – 122 1,558 2 1,560 4 51 (51) 1,564 1,564 15 75 243 (75) 1,822 Amounts recorded in share capital represent the nominal value of the shares issued. The difference between the proceeds received on issue of shares, net of issue costs, and the nominal value of shares issued is credited to the share premium account. At 31 December 2006, there were options outstanding under Save As You Earn schemes to subscribe for 10,722,274 (2005: 12,503,956) shares at prices ranging from 266 pence to 715 pence (2005: 266 pence to 715 pence) and exercisable by the year 2013 (2012). In addition, there are 4,113,481 (2005: 4,668,534) conditional options outstanding under the RSP and 1,623,637 (2005: nil) under the GPSP exercisable at nil cost within a 10-year period. The cost of own shares of £79 million as at 31 December 2006 (2005: £97 million) is deducted from retained earnings. The Company has established trusts to facilitate the delivery of shares under employee incentive plans and savings-related share option schemes. At 31 December 2006, 7.5 million (2005: 10.7 million) Prudential plc shares with a market value of £52 million (2005: £59 million) were held in such trusts. In 2006, the Company purchased 2.3 million (2005: 1.4 million) shares in respect of employee incentive plans at a cost of £15 million (2005: £6 million). The maximum number of shares held in the year was 10.7 million which was at the beginning of the year. Of this total, 4.8 million (2005: 5.7 million) shares were held in trusts under employee incentive plans. Of the total shares held in trust, 2.7 million (2005: 5 million) shares were held by a qualifying employee share ownership trust. These shares are expected to be fully distributed in the future on maturity of savings-related share option schemes at a weighted average exercise price of 303 pence (2005: 286 pence). The Group has consolidated a number of authorised investment funds where it is deemed to control these funds under IFRS. Certain of these funds hold shares in Prudential plc. The total number of shares held by these funds at 31 December 2006 was 4.9 million (2005: 5 million) and the cost of acquiring these shares of £26 million (2005: £26 million) is included in cost of own shares. The market value of these shares as at 31 December 2006 was £34 million (2005: £28 million). P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I Reserves The translation reserve represents cumulative foreign exchange translation differences taken directly to equity in accordance with IFRS, net of related tax. In accordance with IFRS 1, cumulative translation differences are deemed to be zero at 1 January 2004, the date of transition to IFRS. The hedging reserve consists of the portion of the cash flow hedge that is determined to be an effective hedge, net of related tax. The available-for-sale reserve includes gains or losses arising from changes in fair value of available-for-sale securities, net of related tax. P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 211 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued H12: Insurance contract liabilities and unallocated surplus of with-profits funds Movement in year At 1 January 2005 Income and expense included in the income statement Liabilities acquired on purchase of insurance business (note I6) Foreign exchange translation differences At 31 December 2005 At 1 January 2006 Income and expense included in the income statement Foreign exchange translation differences At 31 December 2006 H13: Borrowings Core structural borrowings of shareholder-financed operations Central companies Subordinated debt: ¤500m 5.75% Subordinated Notes 2021 (note i) £435m 6.125% Subordinated Notes 2031 US$1,000m 6.5% Perpetual Subordinated Capital Securities (note ii) US$250m 6.75% Perpetual Subordinated Capital Securities (note iii) US$300m 6.5% Perpetual Subordinated Capital Securities (notes iii and iv) ¤20m Medium Term Subordinated Notes 2023 (note v) Other debt: £150m 9.375% Guaranteed Bonds 2007 £249m 5.5% Bonds 2009 (note vi) £250m 5.875% Bonds 2029 £300m 6.875% Bonds 2023 Total central companies US operations US$250m 8.15% Surplus Notes 2027 (note vii) Egg £200m 6.875% Subordinated Notes 2021 £250m 7.5% Subordinated Notes 2013 Total Insurance Unallocated contract surplus of with- profits funds liabilities £m £m 103,582 12,193 837 3,824 8,315 3,003 0 12 120,436 11,330 120,436 7,811 (5,034) 11,330 2,296 (27) 123,213 13,599 2006 £m 2005 £m 335 427 484 125 154 13 341 426 554 142 169 14 1,538 1,646 150 248 249 300 947 150 249 249 300 948 2,485 2,594 127 145 201 250 451 201 250 451 3,063 3,190 Notes (i) The ¤500 million 5.75 per cent borrowings have been swapped into borrowings of £333 million with interest payable at six month £Libor plus 0.962 per cent. (ii) Interest on the US$1,000 million 6.5 per cent borrowings has been swapped into floating rate payments at three month US$Libor plus 0.80 per cent. (iii) This debt is exchangeable into preference shares at Prudential’s option. (iv) Interest on the US$300 million 6.5 per cent borrowings has been swapped into floating rate payments at three month US$Libor plus 0.0225 per cent. (v) The ¤20 million Medium Term Subordinated Notes were issued at 20-year Euro Constant Maturity Swap (capped at 6.5 per cent). These have been swapped into borrowings of £14 million with interest payable at three month £Libor plus 1.2 per cent. (vi) In February 2006, £1.3 million of the original bond issue of £250 million was redeemed. 212 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements H13: Borrowings continued Notes continued (vii) These Surplus Notes are unsecured and subordinated to all present and future indebtedness, policy claims and other creditor claims of the US operations. (viii) Maturity analysis The following table sets out the maturity analysis of the Group’s core structural borrowings: Less than 1 year 1 to 2 years 2 to 3 years 3 to 4 years 4 to 5 years Over 5 years Total Operational borrowings attributable to shareholder-financed operations Borrowings in respect of short-term fixed income securities programmes Commercial paper Floating Rate Notes 2007 Medium-Term Notes 2010 Non-recourse borrowings of investment subsidiaries managed by PPM America Non-recourse borrowings of investment subsidiaries (notes i and iii) Non-recourse borrowings of Piedmont and CDO funds (notes ii and iii) Borrowings in respect of banking operations (note iv) Other borrowings Bank loans and overdrafts Obligations under finance leases Total Notes (i) These borrowings include senior and subordinated debt. The senior debt is secured on the investments held by the relevant subsidiaries. The weighted average interest rates on the senior debt are variable based on a market rate and were 5.93 per cent and 4.48 per cent at 31 December 2006 and 31 December 2005 respectively. The interests of the holders of the subordinated debt issued by these subsidiaries are subordinate to the entitlements of the holders of the senior debt. (ii) Piedmont is an investment trust investing in certain asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities in the US. These borrowings pertain to debt instruments issued to external parties. (iii) In all instances the holders of the debt instruments issued by these subsidiaries and other companies and funds do not have recourse beyond the assets of those subsidiaries and funds. (iv) The borrowings in respect of banking operations comprise deposits by banks of £2,220 million (2005: £2,452 million) and unsubordinated debt securities issued by Egg of £599 million (2005: £1,404 million). The deposits by banks mainly relate to securitisation of credit card receivables. See also note G4. (v) Maturity analysis The following table sets out the maturity analysis of the Group’s operational borrowings attributable to shareholder-financed operations: Less than 1 year 1 to 2 years 2 to 3 years 3 to 4 years 4 to 5 years Over 5 years Total 2006 £m 3,135 533 946 266 48 681 5,609 2005 £m 2,440 1,055 523 1,013 449 952 6,432 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 213 2006 £m 150 – 248 – – 2,665 3,063 A B 2005 £m – 150 – 249 – 2,791 3,190 2006 £m 2005 £m C 2,017 5 10 2,032 76 667 743 2,819 9 6 15 1,461 – 11 1,472 133 952 1,085 3,856 11 8 19 5,609 6,432 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued H13: Borrowings continued Borrowings attributable to with-profits funds Non-recourse borrowings of venture fund investment subsidiaries £100m 8.5% Undated Subordinated Guaranteed Bonds of Scottish Amicable Finance plc (note i) Other borrowings (predominantly external funding of consolidated investment vehicles) Total 2006 £m 926 100 750 2005 £m 988 100 810 1,776 1,898 Notes (i) The interests of the holders of the bonds issued by Scottish Amicable Finance plc, a subsidiary of the Scottish Amicable Insurance Fund, are subordinate to the entitlements of the policyholders of that fund. (ii) Maturity analysis The following table sets out the maturity analysis of the Group’s borrowings attributable to with-profits funds: Less than 1 year 1 to 2 years 2 to 3 years 3 to 4 years 4 to 5 years Over 5 years Total H14: Provisions and contingencies Provisions Provision in respect of defined benefit pension schemes (note I1): (Surplus) deficit, gross of deferred tax, based on scheme assets held, including investments in Prudential insurance policies: Attributable to PAC with-profits fund (i.e. absorbed by the liability for unallocated surplus) Attributable to shareholder-financed operations (i.e. to shareholders’ equity) Add back: investments in Prudential insurance policies Provision after elimination of investments in Prudential insurance policies and matching policyholder liability from Group balance sheet Other provisions (see below) Total provisions Analysis of other provisions: At 1 January Charged to income statement: Additional provisions Unused amounts reversed Used during the year Exchange differences At 31 December Comprising: Legal provisions Restructuring provisions Other provisions 2006 £m 33 12 – 319 – 1,412 1,776 2005 £m 39 74 40 62 133 1,550 1,898 2006 £m 2005 £m (73) 8 (65) 287 222 242 464 2006 £m 176 172 (13) (89) (4) 242 11 76 155 242 329 214 543 253 796 176 972 2005 £m 181 85 (25) (63) (2) 176 11 41 124 176 Of the other provisions balance, £55 million (2005: £74 million) is expected to be settled within one year. Employer contributions expected to be paid into defined benefit pension schemes within one year are shown in note I1. 214 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements H14: Provisions and contingencies continued Legal provisions The legal provisions of £11 million (2005: £11 million) relate predominantly to Jackson. Jackson has been named in civil proceedings, which appear to be substantially similar to other class action litigation brought against many life insurers in the US, alleging misconduct in the sale of insurance products. During 2006, an additional provision of £3 million was made, £2 million was paid and there was a £1 million exchange gain. Restructuring provisions Restructuring provisions of £76 million (2005: £41 million) comprise £72 million (2005: £30 million) relating to restructuring activity of UK insurance operations, £4 million (2005: £1 million) relating to Egg and £nil (2005: £10 million) relating to closure costs in Japan. UK restructuring In 2004 and 2005, Prudential implemented restructurings relating to document management review, streamlining operations, and the relocation of activities to an offshore base in India. In December 2005, the Group announced an initiative for UK insurance operations to work more closely with Egg and M&G and in the process facilitate the realisation of substantial annualised pre-tax cost savings and opportunities for revenue synergies. At 1 January 2005, a provision of £49 million was brought forward, and during 2005 an additional £1 million was provided, £11 million of unused provision was released, and £9 million was paid. During 2006, an additional provision of £75 million was provided, £4 million of unused provision was released, and £29 million was paid. Egg restructuring At 1 January 2005, a provision of £17 million was brought forward relating to Egg’s withdrawal from the French market, of which £16 million was used during 2005. In 2006, as a result of the UK and Egg initiative described above, a provision of £11 million was set up, of which £8 million was used. Japan restructuring In 2005, Japan closed its Financial Advisor distribution channel. A £10 million provision was set up relating to closure and redundancy costs, which was used during 2006. Other provisions Other provisions of £155 million (2005: £124 million) include provisions of £134 million (2005: £94 million) relating to staff benefit schemes. During 2006, another £78 million was provided, £7 million of unused provision was released, and £31 million was paid. In 2005, a provision of £77 million was brought forward, an additional £27 million was provided and £10 million was paid. Other provisions also include £18 million (2005: £19 million) relating to various onerous contracts where, in 2006, an additional £1 million was provided and £2 million was used. In 2005, £29 million was brought forward, £6 million was released and £4 million was used. The remaining provisions of £3 million (2005: £11 million) include VAT provisions. Contingencies and related obligations Litigation In addition to the legal proceedings relating to Jackson mentioned above, the Group is involved in other litigation and regulatory issues arising in the ordinary course of business. Whilst the outcome of such matters cannot be predicted with certainty, the directors believe that the ultimate outcome of such litigation will not have a material adverse effect on the Group’s financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows. Pension mis-selling review In 1988, the UK government introduced new pensions legislation intended to encourage more individuals to make their own arrangements for their pensions. During the period from April 1988 to June 1994, many individuals were advised by insurance companies, Independent Financial Advisers and other intermediaries to not join, to transfer from or to opt out of their occupational pension schemes in favour of private pension products introduced under the UK Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988. The UK insurance regulator (previously the Personal Investment Authority, now the FSA), subsequently determined that many individuals were incorrectly advised and would have been better off not purchasing the private pension products sold to them. Industry participants are responsible for compensating the persons to whom private pensions were mis-sold. As a result, the FSA required that all UK life insurance companies review their potential cases of pension mis-selling and pay compensation to policyholders where necessary and, as a consequence, record a provision for the estimated costs. The Group met the requirement of the FSA to issue offers to all cases by 30 June 2002. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 215 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued H14: Provisions and contingencies continued The table below summarises the change in the pension mis-selling provision for the years ended 31 December 2006 and 2005. The change in the provision is included in benefits and claims in the income statement and the movement in unallocated surplus of with-profits funds has been determined accordingly. Balance at beginning of year Change arising from adoption of FRS 27 Changes to actuarial assumptions and method of calculation Discount unwind Redress to policyholders Payment of administrative costs Balance at end of year 2006 £m 331 – 108 15 (48) (5) 401 2005 £m 487 (109) (28) 14 (21) (12) 331 The pension mis-selling provision is included within the liabilities in respect of investment contracts with discretionary participation features under IFRS 4. The liability accounting for the contracts which are the subject of the mis-selling provision is reflected in two elements, namely the core policyholder liability determined on the basis applied for other contract liabilities and the mis-selling provision. The overall liability for these contracts remains appropriate in the context of the accounting for policyholder liabilities that determines the calculation of both elements. However, the constituent elements are reallocated and remeasured for the changes arising from the application of the realistic Peak 2 basis of liabilities for the core policyholder liability, as reflected in the IFRS policy improvement to apply the UK GAAP standard FRS 27 as described in section A4. The change arising from the adoption of FRS 27 in 2005 is due to two factors, namely: (i) Under the FRS 27 basis, which follows the FSA realistic Peak 2 approach, best estimate assumptions apply. Previously a margin for adverse deviation was incorporated; and (ii) The pension mis-selling provision is the additional amount needed i.e. between the value of the guarantees given to policyholders and the values of the personal pension policies. The latter item is calculated differently under the previous Peak 1 and Peak 2 bases. The Peak 1 calculation is deterministic and excludes provision for terminal bonus. The Peak 2 calculation is stochastic and includes provision for terminal bonus. The FSA periodically updates the actuarial assumptions to be used in calculating the provision, including interest rates and mortality assumptions. The pension mis-selling provision represents the discounted value of future expected payments, including benefit payments and all internal and external legal and administrative costs of adjudicating, processing and settling those claims. To the extent that amounts have not been paid, the provision increases each year reflecting the shorter period of discount. The directors believe that, based on current information, the provision, together with future investment return on the assets backing the provision, will be adequate to cover the costs of pension mis-selling as well as the costs and expenses of the Group’s pension review unit established to identify and settle such cases. Such provision represents the best estimate of probable costs and expenses. However, there can be no assurance that the current provision level will not need to be increased. The costs associated with the pension mis-selling review have been met from the inherited estate. Accordingly, these costs have not been charged to the asset shares used in the determination of policyholder bonus rates. Hence policyholders’ pay-out values have been unaffected by pension mis-selling. P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V In 1998, Prudential stated that deducting mis-selling costs from the inherited estate would not impact its bonus or investment policy and it gave an assurance that if this unlikely event were to occur, it would make available support to the fund from shareholder resources for as long as the situation continued, so as to ensure that policyholders were not disadvantaged. The assurance was designed to protect both existing policyholders at the date it was announced, and policyholders who subsequently purchased policies while the pension mis-selling review was continuing. This review was completed on 30 June 2002. The assurance will continue to apply to any policy in force at 31 December 2003, both for premiums paid before 1 January 2004, and for subsequent regular premiums (including future fixed, RPI or salary related increases and Department of Work and Pensions rebate business). The assurance has not applied to new business since 1 January 2004. New business in this context consists of new policies, new members to existing pension schemes plus regular and single premium top-ups, transfers and switches to existing arrangements. The maximum amount of capital support available under the terms of the assurance will reduce over time as claims are paid on the policies covered by it. The bonus and investment policy for each type of with-profits policy is the same irrespective of whether or not the assurance applies. Hence removal of the assurance for new business has had no impact on policyholder returns and this is expected to continue for the foreseeable future. 216 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements H14: Provisions and contingencies continued Mortgage endowment products review In common with several other UK insurance companies, the Group used to sell low-cost endowment products related to repayment of residential mortgages. At sale, the initial sum assured is set at a level such that the projected benefits, including an estimate of the annual bonus receivable over the life of the policy, will equal or exceed the mortgage debt. Because of a decrease in expected future investment returns since these products were sold, the FSA is concerned that the maturity value of some of these products will be less than the mortgage debt. The FSA has worked with insurance companies to devise a programme whereby the companies write to customers indicating whether they may have a possible shortfall and outline the actions that the customers can take to prevent this possibility. The Group is exposed to mortgage endowment products in respect of policies issued by Scottish Amicable Life plc (SAL) and policies issued by Scottish Amicable Life Assurance Society (SALAS) which were transferred into SAIF. At 31 December 2006, provisions of £5 million (2005: £6 million) in SAL and £45 million (2005: £50 million) in SAIF were held to cover potential compensation in respect of mortgage endowment product mis-selling claims. As SAIF is a separate sub-fund of the Prudential Assurance long-term business fund, this provision has no impact on shareholders. In addition, in the year ended 31 December 2006 Prudential Assurance’s main with-profits fund paid compensation of £11 million (2005: £24 million) in respect of mortgage endowment products mis-selling claims and at 31 December 2006 held a provision of £60 million (2005: £63 million) in respect of further compensation. The movement in this provision has no impact on the Group’s profit before tax. In May 2006, the Group introduced a deadline for both Prudential and Scottish Amicable mortgage endowment complaints. Impacted customers have three years to lodge a mis-selling complaint in line with the time limit prescribed by the FSA and the ABI. Guaranteed annuities Prudential Assurance used to sell guaranteed annuity products in the UK and at 31 December 2006 held a provision of £47 million (2005: £52 million) within the main with-profits fund to honour guarantees on these products. The Group’s main exposure to guaranteed annuities in the UK is through SAIF and at 31 December 2006 a provision of £561 million (2005: £619 million) was held in SAIF to honour the guarantees. As SAIF is a separate sub-fund of the Prudential Assurance long-term business fund, the movement in this provision has no impact on shareholders. Other matters Inherited estate of the PAC long-term fund The assets of the main with-profits fund within the long-term fund of PAC comprise the amounts that it expects to pay out to meet its obligations to existing policyholders and an additional amount used as working capital. The amount payable over time to policyholders from the with-profits fund is equal to the policyholders’ accumulated asset shares plus any additional payments that may be required by way of smoothing or to meet guarantees. The balance of the assets of the with-profits fund is called the ‘inherited estate’ and has accumulated over many years from various sources. The inherited estate represents the major part of the working capital of PAC’s long-term insurance fund. This enables the Company to support with-profits business by providing the benefits associated with smoothing and guarantees, by providing investment flexibility for the fund’s assets, by meeting the regulatory capital requirements that demonstrate solvency and by absorbing the costs of significant events or fundamental changes in its long-term business without affecting the bonus and investment policies. The size of the inherited estate fluctuates from year to year depending on the investment return and the extent to which it has been required to meet smoothing costs, guarantees and other events. PAC believes that it would be beneficial if there were greater clarity as to the status of the inherited estate. As a result, PAC has announced that it has begun a process to determine whether it can achieve that clarity through a reattribution of the inherited estate. As part of this process a Policyholder Advocate has been nominated to represent policyholders’ interests. This nomination does not mean that a reattribution will occur. P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I Given the size of the Group’s with-profits business any proposal is likely to be time consuming and complex to implement and is likely to involve a payment to policyholders from shareholders’ funds. If a reattribution is completed the inherited estate will continue to provide working capital for the long-term insurance fund. Support for long-term business funds by shareholders’ funds As a proprietary insurance company, the Group is liable to meet its obligations to policyholders even if the assets of the long-term funds are insufficient to do so. The assets, represented by the ‘unallocated surplus of with-profits funds’, in excess of amounts expected to be paid for future terminal bonuses and related shareholder transfers (the excess assets) in the long-term funds could be materially depleted over time by, for example, a significant or sustained equity market downturn, costs of significant fundamental strategic change or a material increase in the pension mis-selling provision. In the unlikely circumstance that the depletion of the excess assets within the long- term fund was such that the Group’s ability to satisfy policyholders’ reasonable expectations was adversely affected, it might become necessary to restrict the annual distribution to shareholders or to contribute shareholders’ funds to the long-term funds to provide financial support. P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 217 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued H14: Provisions and contingencies continued In 1997, the business of SALAS, a mutual society, was transferred to Prudential Assurance. In effecting the transfer, a separate sub-fund, SAIF, was established within Prudential Assurance’s long-term business fund. This sub-fund contains all the with-profits business and all other pension business that was transferred. No new business has been or will be written in the sub-fund and the sub-fund is managed to ensure that all the invested assets are distributed to SAIF policyholders over the lifetime of SAIF policies. With the exception of certain amounts in respect of the unitised with-profits life business, all future earnings arising in SAIF are retained for SAIF policyholders. Any excess (deficiency) of revenue over expense within SAIF during a period is offset by a transfer to (from) the SAIF unallocated surplus. Shareholders have no interest in the profits of SAIF but are entitled to the investment management fees paid on this business. With the exception of certain guaranteed annuity products mentioned earlier in this note, and certain products which include a minimum guaranteed rate of accumulation, the majority of SAIF with-profits policies do not guarantee minimum rates of return to policyholders. Should the assets of SAIF be inadequate to meet the guaranteed benefit obligations to the policyholders of SAIF, the Prudential Assurance long-term fund would be liable to cover any such deficiency. Due to the quality and diversity of the assets in SAIF and the ability of SAIF to revise guaranteed benefits in the event of an asset shortfall, the directors believe that the probability of either the Prudential Assurance long-term fund or the Group’s shareholders’ funds having to contribute to SAIF is remote. Guarantees and commitments Guarantee funds in both the UK and the US provide for payments to be made to policyholders on behalf of insolvent life insurance companies. These guarantee funds are financed by payments assessed on solvent insurance companies based on location, volume, and types of business. The Group estimated its reserve for future guarantee fund assessments for Jackson to be £9 million at 31 December 2006 (2005: £11 million). Similar assessments for the UK businesses were not significant. The directors believe that the reserve is adequate for all anticipated payments for known insolvencies. Jackson has commitments for future payments related to equity index call options totalling £0.3 million at 31 December 2006 (2005: £3 million). The commitments were entered into in the normal course of business to hedge obligations associated with the issuance of equity index-linked immediate and deferred annuities. The final payment is due in 2007. At 31 December 2006, Jackson has unfunded commitments of £174 million (2005: £227 million) related to its investments in limited partnerships and of £38 million (2005: £104 million) related to commercial mortgage loans. These commitments were entered into in the normal course of business and the directors do not expect a material adverse impact on the operations to arise from them. The Group has provided, from time to time, other guarantees and commitments to third parties entered into in the normal course of business but the directors do not consider that the amounts involved are significant. H15: Other liabilities Creditors arising from direct insurance and reinsurance operations Interest payable Derivative liabilities Other items Total 2006 £m 521 90 663 378 2005 £m 474 61 851 384 1,652 1,770 218 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements I: Other notes I1: Staff and pension plans (a) Staff and employment costs The average number of staff employed by the Group during the year were: Business operations: UK operations US operations Asian operations Venture investment subsidiaries of the PAC with-profits fund Total The costs of employment were: Business operations: Wages and salaries Social security costs Other pension costs (see below) Pension actuarial gains credited to income statement Venture investment subsidiaries of the PAC with-profits fund (see below) Total 2006 2005 10,914 2,863 12,114 8,898 10,708 2,588 9,652 8,713 34,789 31,661 2006 £m 2005 £m 825 65 72 (469) (397) 230 723 799 64 77 (155) (78) 206 991 Other pension costs comprises £45 million (2005: £54 million) relating to defined benefit schemes and £27 million (2005: £23 million) relating to defined contribution schemes. Of the defined contribution scheme costs, £14 million (2005: £13 million) related to overseas defined contribution schemes. The £45 million (2005: £54 million) comprises £29 million (2005: £43 million) charge on an economic basis, reflecting the total assets of the schemes, and a further £16 million (2005: £11 million) charge to adjust for amounts invested in Prudential insurance policies to arrive at the IAS 19 basis charge. The £469 million (2005: £155 million) of actuarial gains comprises £485 million (2005: £171 million) of actuarial gains on an economic basis and £16 million (2005: £16 million) actuarial losses for amounts invested in Prudential insurance policies. The derivation of these amounts is shown in note (b)(i)7 below. Of the £230 million (2005: £206 million) costs of employment for venture investment subsidiaries, £189 million (2005: £169 million) relates to wages and salaries, £27 million (2005: £31 million) relates to social security costs and £14 million (2005: £6 million) relates to pension costs. (b) Pension plans (i) Defined benefit plans 1. Summary The Group business operations operate a number of pension schemes. The specific features of these plans vary in accordance with the regulations of the country in which the employees are located, although they are, in general, funded wholly by the Group and based either on a cash balance formula or on years of service and salary earned in the last year or years of employment. The largest defined benefit scheme is the principal UK scheme, namely the Prudential Staff Pension Scheme (PSPS). 88 per cent (2005: 90 per cent) of the liabilities of the Group defined benefit schemes are accounted for within PSPS. The Group also operates two smaller defined benefit schemes for UK employees in respect of Scottish Amicable and M&G activities. For all three schemes the projected unit method was used for the most recent full actuarial valuations. There is also a small defined benefit scheme in Taiwan. As at 31 December 2006, the shareholders’ share of the surplus for PSPS and the deficits of the other schemes amounted to an £8 million deficit net of related tax relief (2005: £153 million deficit). These amounts are determined after including amounts invested by PSPS and the M&G scheme in Prudential policies as explained later in this note. Defined benefit schemes in the UK are generally required to be subject to full actuarial valuation every three years to assess the appropriate level of funding for schemes having regard to their commitments. These valuations include assessments of the likely rate of return on the assets held within the separate trustee administered funds. PSPS was last actuarially valued as at 5 April 2005 and this valuation demonstrated the scheme to be 94 per cent funded, with a shortfall of actuarially determined assets to liabilities of six per cent, representing a deficit of £243 million. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 219 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued I1: Staff and pension plans continued The finalisation of the valuation as at 5 April 2005 was accompanied by changes to the basis of funding for the scheme. For 2006 and future years, deficit funding amounts designed to eliminate the actuarial deficit over a 10-year period have been and are being made. Total contributions to the Scheme for deficit funding and employer’s contributions for ongoing service for current employees are expected to be of the order of £70-75 million per annum over a 10-year period. However, in the calendar year 2006, total contributions were £137 million. This amount reflects an increased level of current contributions for ongoing service and deficit funding backdated to 6 April 2005. These amounts compared to total contributions in 2005 of £19 million. Under IAS 19 the basis of valuation differs markedly from the full triennial valuation basis. In particular, IAS 19 requires assets of the scheme to be valued at their market value at the year end, while pension liabilities are required to be discounted at a rate consistent with the current rate of return on a high quality corporate bond. As a result, the difference between IAS 19 basis assets and liabilities can be volatile. For those schemes such as PSPS, which hold a substantial proportion of their assets in equity investments, the volatility can be particularly significant. The economic basis (including investments of PSPS and the M&G scheme in Prudential policies as assets) for 2006, a £28 million (2005: £21 million) pre-tax shareholder charge to operating results based on longer-term returns arises. In addition, outside the operating result, but included in total profits is a pre-tax shareholder credit of £167 million (2005: £32 million) for net actuarial gains. In addition, also on the economic basis, the PAC with-profits sub-fund was charged £1 million (2005: £22 million) for the aggregate of service cost and net finance income and benefited by £318 million (2005: £139 million) for its share of net actuarial gains on the scheme assets and liabilities. As shareholder profits for the PAC with-profits sub-fund reflects the surplus for distribution, these amounts are effectively absorbed by an increased charge in the income statement for the transfer to the liability for unallocated surplus. The actuarial gains primarily represent the difference between actual and expected investment returns for the schemes and the reduction in liabilities caused by an increase in the discount rate caused by increases in corporate bond returns. In 2006, the PSPS asset allocation was altered away from equity investments such that at 31 December 2006 the market value of equities for the Group’s defined benefit schemes represented 31 per cent (2005: 52 per cent) of the total asset value whilst the bond portfolio accounted for 43 per cent (2005: 34 per cent). The asset allocation is shown in note 5. Surpluses and deficits on the Group’s defined benefit schemes are apportioned to the PAC life fund and shareholders’ funds based on estimates of employees’ service between them. At 31 December 2005, the deficit on the PSPS was apportioned in the ratio 70/30 between the life fund and shareholder-backed operations. This ratio was determined following extensive analysis of the source of the cumulative funding for the scheme to that date. This basis has been applied for 2006 to the asset and liability movements relating to the position at 1 January 2006, and also to the deficit funding paid in the year. However, the IAS 19 service cost for the year and employer contributions for ongoing service of current employees, have been apportioned in the ratio relevant to current activity. Reflecting these two elements, at 31 December 2006, the total share of the surplus on PSPS and the deficit on the smaller Scottish Amicable scheme attributable to the PAC with-profits fund amounted to a net surplus of £66 million net of related tax relief. The discussions with the Scheme Trustee also led to an altered expectation in 2005 as to future discretionary increases. Previously, it had been the custom to award discretionary increases by reference to inflation levels. From 2005 it was intended that discretionary increases will in most circumstances not exceed 2.5 per cent. 2. Corporate Governance The rules of the Group’s largest pension arrangement, the defined benefit section of PSPS, a final salary scheme, specify that, in exercising its investment powers, the Trustee’s objective is to achieve the best overall investment return consistent with the security of the assets of the scheme. In doing this, regard is had to the nature and duration of the scheme’s liabilities. The Trustee sets the benchmark for the asset mix, following analysis of the liabilities by the Scheme’s Actuary and, having taken advice from the Investment Managers, then selects benchmark indices for each asset type in order to measure investment performance against a benchmark return. P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V The Trustee reviews strategy, the asset mix benchmark and the Investment Managers’ objectives every three years, to coincide with the Actuarial Valuation, or earlier if the Scheme Actuary recommends. Interim reviews are conducted annually based on changing economic circumstances and financial market levels. The Trustee sets the general investment policy and specifies any restrictions on types of investment and the degrees of divergence permitted from the benchmark, but delegates the responsibility for selection and realisation of specific investments to the Investment Managers. In carrying out this responsibility, the Investment Managers are required by the Pensions Act 1995 to have regard to the need for diversification and suitability of investments. Subject to a number of restrictions contained within the relevant investment management agreements, the Investment Managers are authorised to invest in any class of investment asset. However, the Investment Managers will not invest in any new class of investment asset without prior consultation with the Trustee. The Trustee consults the Principal Employer, the Prudential Assurance Company, on these investment principles, but the ultimate responsibility for the investment of the assets of the scheme lies with the Trustee. 220 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements I1: Staff and pension plans continued The investment policies and strategies for the other two UK defined benefit schemes, the M&G Group Pension Scheme and the Scottish Amicable Staff Pension Scheme, which are both final salary schemes, follow similar principles, but have different target allocations, reflecting the particular requirements of the schemes. 3. Assumptions The actuarial assumptions used in determining benefit obligations and the net periodic benefit costs for the years ended 31 December were as follows: Discount rate Rate of increase in salaries Rate of increase of pensions in payment for inflation: Guaranteed (maximum 5%) Guaranteed (maximum 2.5%)* Discretionary* Expected returns on plan assets 2006 % 5.2 5.0 3.0 2.5 2.5 5.9 2005 % 4.8 4.8 2.8 2.5 2.5 6.1 *The rates of 2.5 per cent shown are those for PSPS. Assumed rates of increase of pensions in payment for inflation for all other schemes are 3.0 per cent in 2006 (2005: 2.8 per cent). The change of assumption for discretionary increases first applied in 2005 following discussion with the PSPS trustee. For the purpose of future discretionary awards, it is assumed that a cap of a 2.5 per cent rate of increase will apply rather than, as previously applied, the assumed long-term inflation rate. The calculations are based on current actuarially calculated mortality estimates with a specific allowance made for future improvements in mortality, which is broadly in line with that adopted for the 92 series of mortality tables prepared by the Continuous Mortality Investigation Bureau of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries. The tables used for PSPS at 31 December 2006 were: Male: 100 per cent PMA92 with CMIR17 improvements to the valuation date and medium cohort improvements in future; and Female: 100 per cent PFA92 with CMIR17 improvements to the valuation date and medium cohort improvements in future. The assumed life expectancies on retirement at age 60, based on the mortality table used was: Retiring today Retiring in 15 years’ time The mean term of the current PSPS liabilities is around 20 years. Years Male 25.0 26.1 Female 28.1 29.1 Using external actuarial advice provided by Watson Wyatt Partners for the valuation of PSPS and by Aon Limited for the M&G scheme, and internal advice for the Scottish Amicable scheme, the most recent full valuations have been updated to 31 December 2006, applying the principles prescribed by IAS 19. P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I 4. Summary financial position The Group liability in respect of defined benefit pension schemes is as follows: Economic position: Surplus (deficit), gross of deferred tax, based on scheme assets held, including investments in Prudential insurance policies: Attributable to the PAC with-profits fund (i.e. absorbed by the liability for unallocated surplus) Attributable to shareholder-financed operations (i.e. to shareholders’ equity) Economic surplus (deficit) – as explained in note 5 below Add back: investments in Prudential insurance policies (offset on consolidation in the Group financial statements against insurance liabilities) Provision included in balance sheet under IAS 19 – as explained in note 7 below 2006 £m 2005 £m 73 (8) 65 (287) (222) (329) (214) (543) (253) (796) P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V The following disclosures explain the economic position and IAS 19 basis of accounting after eliminating investment in Prudential insurance policies on consolidation. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 221 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued I1: Staff and pension plans continued 5. Group economic financial position The economic financial position of the deferred benefit pension schemes reflects the total assets of the schemes including investments in Prudential policies. This is to be contrasted with the IAS 19 basis assets of the PSPS and M&G schemes, as consolidated into the Group balance sheet, which exclude investments in Prudential insurance policies which on the financial statement presentation are offset against policyholder liabilities. (i) The surplus or deficits on the PSPS and Scottish Amicable schemes are partially attributable to the PAC with-profits fund; and (ii) The M&G pension scheme has invested £161 million at 31 December 2006 (2005: £147 million) in Prudential insurance policies. Additionally, the PSPS scheme has invested £126 million at 31 December 2006 (2005: £106 million) in Prudential insurance policies. As required by IFRS, this amount of scheme asset is eliminated against the policyholder liability and hence, for the purposes of preparing the consolidated balance sheet, the IAS 19 basis net pension liability is £287 million (2005: £253 million) lower than the ‘economic basis’ surplus of £65 million (2005: ‘economic basis’ deficit of £543 million). On the ‘economic basis’, after including the underlying assets represented by the investments in Prudential insurance policies as scheme assets, the assets of the schemes at 31 December were: 2006 2005 Equities Bonds Properties Cash Total value of assets £m 1,628 2,259 638 750 5,275 % 31 43 12 14 100 £m 2,543 1,663 590 79 4,875 % 52 34 12 2 100 The present value of the liabilities of the four schemes at 31 December 2006 was £5,210 million (2005: £5,418 million). The resulting scheme surplus or deficit arising from the excess of assets over liabilities or vice versa at 31 December 2006 comprised surplus of £73 million (2005: deficit of £329 million) attributable to the PAC with-profits fund and deficit of £8 million (2005: deficit of £214 million) attributable to shareholder operations. The movements in the deficit on the ‘economic basis’ between scheme assets and liabilities were: Current service cost Contributions Other finance income Actuarial gains Net decrease 2006 £m (69) 152 40 485 608 2005 £m (65) 29 22 171 157 222 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements I1: Staff and pension plans continued Estimated pension scheme liability attributable to shareholder operations – economic basis Movements on the pension scheme deficits (determined on the ‘economic basis’), to the extent attributable to shareholder operations are as follows: 2006 Gross of tax deficit Related deferred tax Net of tax deficit 2005 Gross of tax deficit Related deferred tax Net of tax deficit At beginning of year £m (214) 61 (153) (175) 49 (126) Notes (i) Charge to operating results (based on longer-term investment returns) This comprises: Current service cost Finance income (expense): Interest on pension scheme liabilities Expected return on pension scheme assets Total charge net of finance income Less: amount attributable to PAC with-profits fund Charge to operating results, based on longer-term investment returns, attributable to shareholders (ii) Actuarial and other gains and losses This comprises: Actual less expected return on pension scheme assets Experience gains on scheme liabilities Changes in assumptions underlying the present value of scheme liabilities Total actuarial and other gains Less: amount attributable to PAC with-profits fund Actuarial gains attributable to shareholders Add: additional loss on change of estimate of allocation of opening 2005 deficit between shareholder operations and the PAC with-profits fund Charge for actuarial and other gains and losses attributable to shareholders, excluded from operating results based on longer-term investment returns, but included in profit before tax attributable to shareholders Actuarial and other gains and losses Charge to operating results (based on Actuarial gains (losses) longer-term attributable investment to shareholders returns) (note ii) (note i) £m £m Charge for revised estimate PSPS of Contributions paid by shareholder operations £m deficit allocation (note ii) £m (28) 9 (19) (21) 6 (15) 167 (50) 117 32 (9) 23 – – – (63) 19 (44) 67 (20) 47 13 (4) 9 2006 £m (69) (255) 295 40 (29) 1 (28) 2006 £m 156 18 311 485 (318) 167 – 167 At end of year £m (8) 0 (8) (214) 61 (153) 2005 £m (65) (257) 279 22 (43) 22 (21) 2005 £m 544 1 (374) 171 (139) 32 (63) (31) Since shareholder profits in respect of the PAC with-profits fund are a function of the actuarially determined surplus for distribution, the overall income statement result is not directly affected by the level of pension cost or other expenses attributable to the fund. Included within the charge for 2005 of £374 million for changes in assumptions is a credit for past service costs of £115 million for a reduction in the assumed level of discretionary increase for future pensions in payment for PSPS. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 223 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued I1: Staff and pension plans continued Estimated pension scheme surplus (deficit) attributable to PAC with-profits fund – economic basis Movements on the pension scheme surplus (deficits) (determined on the ‘economic basis’ under which PSPS scheme assets include investments in Prudential insurance policies) are as follows: 2006 Gross of tax surplus (deficit) Related deferred tax Net of tax surplus (deficit) 2005 Gross of tax deficit Related deferred tax Net of tax deficit Actuarial and other gains and losses Service cost less net finance income (note i above) £m Credit for revised estimate of PSPS deficit Contributions paid by PAC (note ii with-profits fund above) £m £m allocation Actuarial gains (losses) (note ii above) £m At beginning of year £m (329) 33 (296) (525) 53 (472) (1) 0 (1) (22) 2 (20) 318 (32) 286 139 (14) 125 – – – 63 (6) 57 85 (8) 77 16 (2) 14 At end of year £m 73 (7) 66 (329) 33 (296) The charges and credits for service cost, net finance income, and actuarial and other gains and losses are included within the income statement but taken account of in determining the charge in the income statement for the transfer to the liability for unallocated surplus of with-profits funds. 6. Movement in IAS 19 basis financial position The change in the present value of the benefit obligation and the change in fair value of the assets for the total of the PSPS, Scottish Amicable, M&G and Taiwan schemes over the period were as follows: IAS 19 basis: Investments change in in Prudential insurance policies £m fair value of plan assets £m IAS 19 basis: change in present value of benefit obligation £m Economic basis: total assets £m 4,622 253 4,875 4,622 253 4,875 279 1 148 140 (202) 16 1 4 16 (3) 295 2 152 156 (205) 4,988 287 5,275 (5,418) (5,418) (69) (255) (2) 329 205 (5,210) Economic basis: net obligation £m 4,875 (5,418) (543) (69) (255) 295 – 152 485 – 5,275 (5,210) 65 2006 Fair value of plan assets, beginning of year Present value of benefit obligation, beginning of year Service cost – current charge only Interest cost Expected return on plan assets Employee contributions Employer contributions Actuarial gains Benefit payments Fair value of plan assets, end of year Present value of benefit obligation, end of year Economic basis surplus 224 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements I1: Staff and pension plans continued 2005 Fair value of plan assets, beginning of year Present value of benefit obligation, beginning of year Less: PSPS scheme plan assets used to acquire Prudential insurance policies Service cost – current charge only Interest cost Expected return on plan assets Employee contributions Employer contributions Actuarial and other gains* Benefit payments Fair value of plan assets, end of year Present value of benefit obligation, end of year Economic basis deficit *Including £115 million credit for past service costs as described above. 7. IAS 19 basis financial position as consolidated The IAS 19 basis net pensions deficit can be summarised as follows: Fair value of plan assets, end of year Present value of funded benefit obligation Funded status Present value of unfunded obligations (M&G scheme)* Provision recognised in the balance sheet IAS 19 basis: change in fair value of plan assets £m Investments in Prudential insurance policies £m Economic basis: total assets £m 4,092 125 4,217 4,092 (99) 125 99 4,217 – 268 0 25 528 (192) 11 1 4 16 (3) 279 1 29 544 (195) 4,622 253 4,875 IAS 19 basis: change in present value of benefit obligation £m (4,917) (4,917) (65) (257) (1) (373) 195 (5,418) Economic basis: net obligation £m 4,217 (4,917) (700) – (65) (257) 279 – 29 171 – 4,875 (5,418) (543) 2006 £m 2005 £m 2004 £m 4,988 (5,023) 4,622 (5,228) 4,092 (4,777) (35) (187) (222) (606) (190) (796) (685) (140) (825) *The M&G pension scheme assets are invested in Prudential insurance policies. For IFRS accounting purposes, the M&G scheme is in effect unfunded. Please see above for more details. Components of net periodic pension cost Current service cost Interest cost Expected return on assets – economic basis Less: expected return on investments of scheme assets in Prudential insurance policies Expected return on assets – IAS 19 basis** Pension cost charge (as referred to in note I1(a)) Actuarial gains – economic basis Less: actuarial gains on investments of scheme assets in Prudential insurance policies Actuarial gains – IAS 19 basis (as referred to in note I1(a)) Net periodic pension credit (included within acquisition and other operating expenditure in the income statement) **In determining the expected return on plan assets for 2006, the 6.1 per cent rate shown above has been applied to the opening assets. 2006 £m 2005 £m (69) (255) 295 (16) 279 (45) 485 (16) 469 (65) (257) 279 (11) 268 (54) 171 (16) 155 424 101 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 225 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued I1: Staff and pension plans continued The long-term expected rate of return has been taken to be the weighted average (by market value) of the long-term expected rates of return on each major asset class shown below: 2006 2005 2004 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Plan assets (IAS 19 basis) Equity Bonds Properties Cash Total Long-term expected rate of return Equity Bonds Properties Cash Weighted average long-term expected rate of return £m % £m 1,432 2,185 621 750 4,988 29 44 12 15 100 2,376 1,593 575 78 4,622 % 51 35 12 2 100 £m 2,516 993 520 63 4,092 2006 % 7.5 4.8 6.8 5.0 5.9 % 61 24 13 2 100 2005 % 7.1 4.5 6.4 4.5 6.1 The expected rates of return have been determined by reference to long-term expectations, the carrying value of the assets and equity and other market conditions at the balance sheet date. The actual return on plan assets was £419 million (2005: £796 million) on an IAS 19 basis. None of the scheme assets included shares in Prudential plc or property occupied by the Prudential Group. Fair value of plan assets, end of year (IAS 19 basis) Present value of the benefit obligation, end of year Plan assets in deficit of benefit obligation Experience adjustments on plan liabilities Percentage of plan liabilities at 31 December Experience adjustments on plan assets (IAS 19 basis) Percentage of plan assets at 31 December 2006 £m 2005 £m 2004 £m 4,988 (5,210) 4,622 (5,418) 4,092 (4,917) (222) (796) (825) 18 1 (0.35)% (0.02)% 140 2.81% 11.42% 527 (17) 0.35% 112 2.74% Total employer contributions expected to be paid into the Group defined benefit schemes for the year ending 31 December 2007 amounts to £93 million (2006: £85 million). 8. Sensitivity of PSPS financial position to key variables The table below shows the sensitivity of the PSPS liabilities at 31 December 2006 of £4,607 million to changes in discount rates, inflation rates and mortality assumptions. Assumption Discount rate Discount rate Rate of inflation Change in assumption Impact on scheme liabilities on IAS 19 basis Decrease by 0.2% from 5.2% to 5.0% Increase scheme liabilities by 3.6% Increase by 0.2% from 5.2% to 5.4% Decrease scheme liabilities by 3.4% Decrease by 0.2% from 3.0% to 2.8% with consequent reduction in salary increases Decrease scheme liabilities by 1.3% Mortality rates Reduce rates from 100% of table to 95% Increase liabilities by 1.2% 226 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements I1: Staff and pension plans continued 9. Transfer value of PSPS scheme At 31 December 2006, it is estimated that the assets of the scheme are broadly sufficient to cover the liabilities of PSPS on a ‘buyout’ basis including an allowance for expenses. The ‘buyout’ basis refers to a basis that might apply in the circumstance of a transfer to another appropriate financial institution. In making this assessment it has been assumed that a more conservative investment strategy applies together with a more prudent allowance for future mortality improvements and no allowance for discretionary pension increases. (ii) Other pension plans The Group operates various defined contribution pension schemes including schemes in Jackson, Egg and Asia. As noted earlier, the cost of the Group’s contributions to these schemes in 2006 was £27 million (2005: £23 million). I2: Share-based payments (a) Relating to Prudential plc shares The Group maintains 10 main share award and share option plans relating to Prudential plc shares, which are described below. In the year ended 31 December 2006, two new incentive plans were created and approved by shareholders at the Annual General Meeeting. The Group Performance Share Plan (GPSP) and the Business Unit Performance Plan (BUPP) were established and directors were authorised to implement these schemes in the UK and other countries in which Prudential operates. The GPSP is the new incentive plan in which all executive directors and other senior executives within the Group can participate. This scheme was established as a replacement for the Restricted Share Plan (RSP) under which no further awards could be made after March 2006. Awards are granted either in the form of a nil cost option, conditional right over shares, or such other form that shall confer to the participant an equivalent economic benefit, with a vesting period of three years. The performance condition for the initial awards was on the basis that Total Shareholder Return (TSR) outperformed an index comprising of peer companies. This approach is more robust than a rank-based approach and ensures that maximum vesting is only achieved if the Company outperforms the average comparator performance by a significant margin. Outperformance would be measured on a compound basis and vesting of the awards between each performance point is on a straight-line sliding scale basis. Participants would be entitled to the value of reinvested dividends that would have accrued on the shares that vest. The RSP was, until March 2006, the Group’s long-term incentive plan for executive directors and other senior executives designed to provide rewards linked to shareholder return. Each year participants were granted a conditional option to receive a number of shares. There was a deferment period of three years at the end of which the award vested to an extent that depended on the performance of the Group’s shares including notional reinvested dividends and on the Group’s underlying financial performance. After vesting, the award may be exercised at zero cost at any time, subject to closed period rules, in the balance of a 10-year period. Shares are purchased in the open market by a trust for the benefit of qualifying employees. Currently, the trust holds at least the maximum number of shares conditionally awarded and not yet forfeited or exercised. The RSP replaced the Executive Share Option Scheme in 1995 and all options under this prior plan had been exercised at 31 December 2005. No rights were granted in the RSP if the Company’s TSR performance as ranked against the comparator group is below 50th percentile. For performance at 50th percentile, an award of 25 per cent of the maximum award is made. The maximum grant is made only if the TSR ranking of the Company is 20th percentile or above. Between these points, the size of the grant made is calculated on a straight-line sliding scale. This performance measure was chosen when the RSP was introduced as it reflected a combination of market practice, an assessment of Prudential’s main competitors and the focus of UK investors at that time. In normal circumstances, directors may take up their right to receive shares at any time during the following seven years. P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I The BUPP is an incentive plan created to provide a common framework under which awards would be made to the Chief Executives of Prudential UK & Europe insurance operations, Jackson and Prudential Corporation Asia, being a replacement to the existing incentive plans for these individuals. The plan is an incentive to promote ownership and encourage accountability for sustained long-term regional performance. Awards under this plan would be based on growth in Shareholder Capital Value on the European Embedded Value (EEV) basis with performance measured over three years. Upon vesting, half of the awards would be released as shares and the other half would be released in cash. Participants are entitled to receive the value of reinvested dividends over the performance period for those shares that vest. The growth parameters for the awards would be relevant to each region and vesting of the awards between each performance point is on a straight-line sliding scale basis. The Savings-Related Share Option Scheme is designed to foster share ownership among UK and certain non-UK employees. Permanent employees are eligible for this plan if they have been employed by the Group for the previous six months. At the outset, participants choose an option period (three, five or seven years, or a combination of these periods) and the amount of monthly contributions to be made from their earnings during the option period, which determines the number of options granted. The option price is fixed at the start and is based on a discount of 20 per cent to the market price. Participants may exercise their options within six months of the end of the option period. If options are not exercised, participants are entitled to receive a refund of their cash contributions plus interest. P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 227 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued I2: Share-based payments continued The Prudential International Savings-Related Share Option Scheme operates on a similar basis to the UK Savings-Related Share Option Scheme, for employees in Hong Kong, Malaysia, Singapore, Taiwan, India and Korea. The International Savings-Related Share Option Scheme for Non-Employees also operates on a similar basis to the UK Savings-Related Share Option Scheme, for agents in Hong Kong. No options may be granted under the three savings-related schemes described above if such grant would cause the number of shares which have been issued, or which remain issuable pursuant to options granted in the preceding 10 years under the scheme and other share option schemes operated by the Company, or which have been issued under any other share incentive scheme of the Company, to exceed 10 per cent of the Company’s issued ordinary share capital at the proposed date of grant. The Prudential UK Share Incentive Plan (SIP) is also designed to foster share ownership amongst staff in designated UK businesses. It enables employees to buy shares on a tax efficient basis. For every four partnership shares bought, an additional matching share is granted, purchased in the open market. Participants have voting rights and are entitled to dividend payments which are reinvested in the SIP. Partnership shares may be withdrawn from the scheme at any time while matching shares may only be withdrawn five years after their award date. Jackson operates a performance-related share award which, subject to the prior approval of the Jackson Remuneration Committee, may grant share awards to eligible employees in the form of a contingent right to receive shares or a conditional allocation of shares. These share awards have vesting periods of four years and are at nil cost to the employee. The employee does not have any beneficial ownership of the shares and, accordingly, does not have any right to dividends or voting rights attaching to the shares. Only issued shares purchased from the open market are used for the performance share award and there is no limit on the value of shares which may be granted to a participant in any year or over the life of the plan, which is usually no longer than 10 years. The Annual Incentive Plan is designed so that a portion of any overall award may be made in the form of a deferred share award. A deferred share award is awarded to board members in respect of any overall annual incentive award above 50 per cent of salary, and will represent the element of the bonus above 50 per cent of salary. The award is restricted for three years before it can be released, subject to close periods, to the participant who must not be under a period of notice at the time and must still be in employment of Prudential. The shares are held in the employee share trust and shares equivalent to dividends otherwise payable will accumulate up to the release date. The Share Participation Plan was designed to encourage share ownership amongst senior executives and to provide rewards based upon various performance factors of the Group. Each year, participants were offered the choice of a cash award, a matching share award if cash or shares to the value of the cash award were lodged, or a combination of 50 per cent of each. Share awards vested after five years for executive directors of Prudential plc and three years (formerly five years) for all other eligible employees and were transferred to the participants at no additional cost. Ordinary shares for share awards were purchased in the open market by a trust, which held them during the vesting period for the benefit of qualifying employees. At 31 December 2006, all outstanding shares in this plan have been paid for by employees and are registered in the names of the participants. No new shares have been granted in this scheme since 1999. In addition, there are other share awards which included the 1,000 Day Long Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) and other arrangements. The 1,000 Day LTIP plan is a UK insurance operations performance-based plan in which the UK Remuneration Committee could, at any time up to 5 October 2005, select employees at its absolute discretion, for participation in the plan. The performance period was 1,000 days and, based on the final performance level being at, or above, the threshold level, the committee shall grant participants 10 per cent of the allocated award in 2005, 20 per cent in 2006 and the remaining 70 per cent in 2007. There are no beneficial interests, or any rights to dividends until such time as the awards are released, at nil cost, to participants. The other arrangements relate to various awards that have been made without performance conditions to individual employees, typically in order to secure their appointment or ensure retention. 228 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements I2: Share-based payments continued Movements in share options outstanding under the Group’s share-based compensation plans relating to Prudential plc shares during 2006 and 2005 were as follows: 2006 2005 Options outstanding (including conditional options) Beginning of year: Granted Exercised Forfeited Expired Adjustment in respect of Egg’s employees End of year Number of options (millions) 17.2 7.7 (5.1) (1.2) (3.1) 1.0 16.5 Weighted average exercise price £ 2.23 2.96 2.75 0.85 4.09 3.64 2.47 Number of options (millions) Weighted average exercise price £ 18.4 3.7 (1.1) (1.9) (1.9) – 17.2 2.21 1.83 2.78 0.81 2.21 – 2.23 3.30 Options immediately exercisable, end of year 0.2 3.56 0.4 The weighted average share price of Prudential plc for the year ended 31 December 2006 was £6.25 compared to £5.01 for the year ended 31 December 2005. Movements in share awards outstanding under the Group’s share-based compensation plans relating to Prudential plc shares at 31 December 2006 and 2005 were as follows: Awards outstanding Beginning of year: Granted Exercised Forfeited Expired End of year 2006 Number of awards (millions) 2005 Number of awards (millions) 4.9 3.2 (1.0) (0.5) – 6.6 2.4 2.8 (0.1) (0.1) (0.1) 4.9 The following table provides a summary of the range of exercise prices for Prudential plc options (including conditional options) outstanding at 31 December 2006. Range of exercise prices Between £0 and £1 Between £1 and £2 Between £2 and £3 Between £3 and £4 Between £4 and £5 Between £5 and £6 Between £6 and £7 Between £7 and £8 Outstanding Weighted average remaining contractual life (years) Exercisable Weighted average exercise prices £ Number exercisable (millions) Weighted average exercise prices £ 8.6 – 2.3 2.0 3.6 3.3 0.6 0.9 4.8 – – 2.66 3.52 4.60 5.63 6.41 7.15 2.47 0.0 – 0.0 0.2 – 0.0 0.0 – 0.2 – – 2.66 3.62 – 5.79 6.34 – 3.56 Number outstanding (millions) 5.7 – 3.2 3.1 3.8 0.7 0.0 0.0 16.5 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 229 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued I2: Share-based payments continued The following table provides a summary of the range of exercise prices for Prudential plc options (including conditional options) outstanding at 31 December 2005. Outstanding Exercisable Range of exercise prices Between £0 and £1 Between £1 and £2 Between £2 and £3 Between £3 and £4 Between £4 and £5 Between £5 and £6 Between £6 and £7 Between £7 and £8 Weighted average remaining contractual life (years) Number outstanding (millions) Weighted average exercise prices £ Number exercisable (millions) Weighted average exercise prices £ 4.7 – 8.0 3.5 0.8 0.2 0.0 0.0 17.2 8.3 – 1.9 2.7 3.9 1.3 1.1 1.7 3.9 – – 2.66 3.53 4.07 5.63 6.56 7.15 2.23 – – – 0.4 – 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 – – – 3.29 – 5.39 6.66 7.15 3.30 The years shown above for weighted average remaining contractual life include the time period from end of vesting period to expiration of contract. The weighted average fair values of Prudential plc options and awards granted during the period are as follows: 2006 Weighted average fair value 2005 Weighted average fair value RSP and GPSP £ 4.30 Other options £ 2.05 Awards £ 6.46 RSP £ 2.96 Other options £ 1.82 Awards £ 4.59 The fair value amounts relating to all options including conditional nil cost options above were determined using the Black-Scholes and the Monte Carlo option-pricing models using the following assumptions: 2006 2005 Dividend yield (%) Expected volatility (%) Risk-free interest rate (%) Expected option life (years) Weighted average exercise price (£) Weighted average share price (£) RSP and GPSP 2.64 25.48 4.68 3.00 – 6.80 Other options 2.64 34.32 4.70 3.42 5.06 6.51 RSP 3.19 42.93 4.65 3.00 – 5.01 Other options 3.19 40.38 4.41 3.62 3.97 5.12 Under IFRS, compensation costs for all share-based compensation plans are determined using the Black-Scholes model and the Monte Carlo model. Share options and awards are valued using the share price at the date of grant. The compensation costs for all awards and options are recognised in net income over the plans’ respective vesting periods. The Group uses the Black-Scholes model to value all options other than the RSP and GPSP. For these options, the Group uses a Monte Carlo model in order to allow for the impact of the TSR performance conditions. These models are used to calculate fair values for share options and awards at the grant date based on the quoted market price of the stock at the measurement date, the amount, if any, that the employees are required to pay, the dividend yield, expected volatility, risk-free interest rates and exercise prices. The expected volatility is measured as the standard deviation of expected share price returns based on statistical analysis of daily share prices over a period up to the grant date equal to the expected life of options. Risk-free interest rates are UK gilt rates with projections for three, five and seven year terms to match corresponding vesting periods. Dividend yield is determined as the average yield over the year of grant and expected dividends are not incorporated into the measurement of fair value. For the RSP, volatility and correlation of the comparator group with the Group are required. These assumptions are based on the TSR of the comparators over a period up to the grant date equal to the performance period. For grants in 2006, an average comparator volatility of 24 per cent and an average correlation of comparators of 19 per cent were used. In addition, for the GPSP, volatility and correlation between Prudential and an index constructed from a simple average of the TSR growth of 10 companies is required. For grants in 2006, an average index volatility and correlation of 14 per cent and 71 per cent respectively, were used. 230 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements I2: Share-based payments continued When options are granted or awards made to employees, an estimate is made of what percentage is more than likely to vest, be forfeited, lapse or cancelled based on historical information. Based on these estimates, compensation expense to be accrued at that date is calculated and amortised over the vesting period. For early exercises of options or release of awards due to redundancy, death or resignation, the compensation expense is immediately recognised and for forfeitures due to employees leaving the Group, any previously recognised expense is reversed. However, if an employee loses their award because of the Group’s failure to meet the performance criteria, previously recognised expense is not reversed. During the year, the Group granted share options to certain non-employee independent financial advisors. Those options were measured using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with assumptions consistent with those of other share options. These transactions were measured using an option model because the Group does not receive a separate and measurable benefit from those non-employees in exchange for the options granted. As such, the fair value of the options themselves is more readily determinable than the services received in return. (b) Relating to Egg plc shares In April 2006, Prudential became bound or entitled to acquire shares in Egg following the announcement of its intention in December 2005 to acquire the minority interests in Egg representing approximately 21.7 per cent of the existing issued share capital of Egg. As a consequence of this acquisition, employees of Egg that were participants of its SAYE schemes were requested to either rollover all or part of their options for equivalent options in Prudential shares or to take no action. Employees could adopt different courses of actions for options granted on different dates but may only adopt one course of action in respect of each grant of options. The rollover was based on employees receiving 0.2237 Prudential shares for each Egg share that was under option with total amount payable for the new Prudential shares being exactly the same as the total amount payable for the Egg shares. In addition, all outstanding executive share options became exercisable and awards under the RSP were assessed against the performance conditions. None of the awards met the performance conditions and they have therefore lapsed in February 2006 following consideration of the performance measurement results by the Remuneration Committee. At 31 December 2006, SAYE options to acquire 135,003 Egg shares remains outstanding because certain employees chose not to take any action. In 2005, the Group maintained three main share award and share option plans relating to Egg shares, which are described below. Awards of shares were made under the RSP at no cost to eligible employees selected by the Remuneration Committee. All Egg’s directors and employees, including employees of its subsidiaries, were eligible to participate, subject to the discretion of the Remuneration Committee. It was, however, intended that participation would, in practice, be restricted to selected individuals in key positions. Employees within two years of their anticipated retirement date were not eligible to participate, except in circumstances which the Remuneration Committee considered to be exceptional. Egg established a discretionary employee benefit trust, the Egg Employee Trust, by a trust deed dated 26 April 2000 between Egg and Mourant & Co. Trustees Limited. At 31 December 2005, the trust held 3.4 million ordinary shares with a market value of £4.2 million which were intended to be used principally for delivery of shares under the employee incentive plans. These shares with a nominal value of £1.7 million were purchased on the open market at a cost of £4.5 million. Egg made the vesting of awards subject to the satisfaction of performance conditions from January 2004 onwards. Previously, the awards had been conditional on service completed. The arrangements for the distribution to employees of shares held in trust and for entitlement to dividend depended on the particulars of each award. Shares held in trust were conditionally gifted to employees. The costs of share awards were charged to the income statement evenly over the period of service for which awards were made for schemes granted after 7 November 2002. Egg also operated a sharesave scheme, which was an Inland Revenue approved all-employee Save as You Earn scheme. Under this scheme, employees entered into either three or five year contracts, at the end of which time they would be entitled to exercise their options and purchase shares at an exercise price fixed at a 20 per cent discount to the share price at the date of grant. Employees had six months after the contract matured in which to exercise the options. These options continued in force until their normal maturity dates. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 231 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued I2: Share-based payments continued Analysis of the movements in the number of shares and weighted average exercise price (with the exception of the Egg RSP where the exercise price is £nil) of options are set out below: Egg RSP awards made prior to 7 November 2002. Outstanding at beginning of year Forfeited Exercised Outstanding and exercisable at the end of year Egg RSP awards made after 7 November 2002. Outstanding at beginning of year Granted Forfeited Exercised Expired Outstanding and exercisable at the end of year Egg sharesave scheme awards made prior to 7 November 2002. Number (millions) 2006 – – – – Number (millions) 2006 6.1 – (2.2) – (3.9) – 2005 0.8 (0.7) (0.1) 0.0 2005 6.2 1.7 (1.5) (0.3) – 6.1 Outstanding at beginning of year Forfeited Exercised Transferred to Prudential SAYE scheme Outstanding and exercisable at the end of year 3 Year Employee Sharesave Scheme 5 Year Employee Sharesave Scheme Number (millions) Weighted average exercise price £ Number (millions) Weighted average exercise price £ 2006 0.5 (0.0) (0.2) (0.3) – 2005 0.7 (0.2) 0.0 – 0.5 2006 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 – 2005 1.16 1.20 1.15 – 1.15 2006 0.3 (0.0) (0.3) – – 2005 0.4 (0.1) – – 0.3 2006 1.20 1.30 1.20 – 1.24 2005 1.20 1.19 – – 1.20 Egg sharesave scheme awards made after 7 November 2002. Outstanding at beginning of year Granted Forfeited Exercised Transferred to Prudential SAYE scheme Outstanding and exercisable at the end of year 3 Year Employee Sharesave Scheme 5 Year Employee Sharesave Scheme Number (millions) Weighted average exercise price £ Number (millions) Weighted average exercise price £ 2006 3.2 – (0.3) (0.0) (2.8) 0.1 2005 3.0 0.9 (0.7) 0.0 – 3.2 2006 0.86 – 0.85 0.80 0.85 0.88 2005 0.85 0.86 0.87 0.80 – 0.86 2006 0.9 – (0.0) – (0.9) – 2005 1.0 0.1 (0.2) – – 0.9 2006 0.83 – 1.03 – 0.83 0.94 2005 0.84 0.86 0.88 – – 0.83 232 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements I2: Share-based payments continued Egg share option scheme awards made prior to 7 November 2002. Outstanding at beginning of year Forfeited Exercised Outstanding and exercisable at the end of year Number (millions) Weighted average exercise price £ 2006 2005 9.3 (2.1) (7.2) – 11.5 (2.2) – 9.3 2006 1.42 1.52 1.39 – 2005 1.42 1.43 – 1.42 The weighted average share price of Egg up to the date of delisting was 127 pence compared with 106 pence at 31 December 2005. The exercise prices and the weighted average remaining contractual life of the number of options outstanding at the year end are as follows: Restricted share plan Pre 2003 grant 2003 grant 2004 grant 2005 grant 3 Year Sharesave Scheme 2001 grant 2002 grant 2003 grant 2004 grant 2005 grant 5 Year Sharesave Scheme 2001 grant 2002 grant 2003 grant 2004 grant 2005 grant Share option schemes Pre 2003 grant 2006 Exercise price £ Number of options (millions) Weighted average remaining contractual life (years) Exercise price £ 2005 Weighted average Number of options (millions) remaining contractual life (years) – – – – – – 1.17 0.80 0.86 1.30 1.15 1.17 0.80 0.86 – – – – – – 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 – – – – – – – 0.9 1.9 – 0.9 1.9 2.9 3.9 – – – – 1.30 1.15 1.17 0.80 0.86 1.30 1.15 1.17 0.80 0.86 – 2.8 2.0 1.2 – 0.4 0.3 1.9 0.9 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.7 0.2 – 0.2 1.6 2.2 – – 0.9 1.9 2.9 0.9 1.9 2.9 3.9 4.9 1.42 – – 1.42 9.3 – P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H The fair value of the Egg RSP scheme at the date of grant was calculated using a Present Economic Value (binomial) model. The fair values of the sharesave schemes at the date of grant were determined using a Black-Scholes model. I In the year ended 31 December 2006, no options were granted on Egg plc shares. P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 233 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued I2: Share-based payments continued The significant assumptions and inputs used to estimate the fair value of the options granted in 2005 are as follows: Share price (£) Exercise price (£) Risk-free interest rate (%) (note i) Expected life (years) Expected volatility (%) (note ii) Dividend yield (%) Share price volatility of comparator group (%) (note iii) Fair value of option (£) 2005 3 Year Sharesave 5 Year Sharesave 1.03 0.86 4.14 3 40 – – 0.41 1.03 0.86 4.15 5 40 – – 0.50 RSP 1.09 – – 3 40 – 20 1.91 Notes (i) The risk-free interest rate reflects yields available on government bonds of similar terms at the date of grant. (ii) The expected volatility input is estimated based on Egg’s own historical volatility and the historical volatility of businesses in the banking sector. (iii) Analysis of the share price volatility of the FTSE 100 has been used as a reasonable proxy for the share price volatility of the comparator group of the RSP, this comparator group being the constituents of the FTSE 350 index. (c) Total share-based payment expense Total expense recognised in the year in the consolidated financial statements related to share-based compensation is as follows: Share-based compensation expense Amount accounted for as equity-settled Carrying value at 31 December of liabilities arising from share-based payment transactions Intrinsic value of above liabilities for which rights had vested at 31 December 2006 £m 22 14 18 3 2005 £m 19 15 10 1 I3: Key management remuneration Key management constitutes the directors of Prudential plc as they have authority and responsibility for planning, directing and controlling the activities of the Group. Total key management remuneration amounts to £13,524,000 (2005: £13,688,000). This comprises salaries and short-term benefits of £8,927,000 (2005: £8,087,000), post-employment benefits of £1,032,000 (2005: £1,020,000), termination benefits of £291,000 (2005: £1,600,000) and share-based payments of £3,286,000 (2005: £2,969,000). Post-employment benefits comprise the change in the transfer value of the accrued benefit relating to directors’ defined benefit pension schemes in the year and the total contributions made to directors’ other pension arrangements. The share-based payments charge is the sum of £1,880,000 (2005: £1,842,000), which is determined in accordance with IFRS 2, ‘Share- Based Payments’ (see note I2) and £1,406,000 (2005: £1,127,000) of deferred share awards. Total key management remuneration includes total directors’ emoluments of £11,084,000 as shown in the directors’ remuneration report on pages 83 to 95, and additional amounts in respect of pensions, share-based payments and termination benefits. Further information on directors’ remuneration is given in the directors’ remuneration report. 234 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements I4: Fees payable to auditor Fees payable to the Company’s auditor for the audit of the Company’s annual accounts Fees payable to the Company’s auditor and its associates for other services: Audit of subsidiaries and associates pursuant to legislation Other services supplied pursuant to legislation Other services relating to taxation Services relating to corporate finance transactions All other services Total 2006 £m 2.3 3.8 4.0 0.2 0.7 1.3 Restated 2005 £m 2.2 3.6 1.4 0.5 0.9 4.2 12.3 12.8 The format of the table has altered from last year in order to comply with new disclosure requirements and the 2005 comparative figures have been restated accordingly. In addition, there were fees of £0.2 million (2005: £0.1 million) for the audit of pension schemes. The Audit Committee regularly monitors the non-audit services provided to the Group by its auditor and has developed a formal Auditor Independence Policy which sets out the types of services that the auditor may provide, consistent with the guidance in Sir Robert Smith’s report ‘Audit Committees – Combined Code Guidance’ and with the provisions of the US Sarbanes-Oxley Act. The Audit Committee annually reviews the auditor’s objectivity and independence. More information on these issues is given in the corporate governance report on page 75. I5: Related party transactions Transactions between the Company and its subsidiaries are eliminated on consolidation. In addition, the Company has transactions and outstanding balances with certain unit trusts, OEICs, collateralised debt obligations and similar entities which are not consolidated and where a Group company acts as manager. These entities are regarded as related parties for the purposes of IAS 24. The balances are included in the Group’s balance sheet at fair value or amortised cost in accordance with their IAS 39 classifications. The transactions are included in the income statement and include amounts paid on issue of shares or units, amounts received on cancellation of shares or units and paid in respect of the periodic charge and administration fee. Further details of the aggregate assets, liabilities, revenues, profits or losses and reporting dates of entities considered to be associates under IFRS are disclosed in note H8. Various executive officers and directors of Prudential may from time to time purchase insurance, investment management or annuity products, or be granted mortgages or credit card facilities marketed by Prudential group companies in the ordinary course of business on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and security requirements, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other persons. Apart from the transactions with directors referred to below, no director had an interest in shares, transactions or arrangements that requires disclosure, other than those given in the directors’ remuneration report. Key management remuneration is disclosed in note I3. In 2006, three (2005: two) directors had credit card borrowings with Egg of £2,000 (2005: £7,000). In addition, in 2005 one director had a mortgage with Egg of £118,000 and one director had a life policy with a sum assured of £4.0 million. In 2006 and 2005, other transactions with directors were de-minimis both by virtue of their size and in the context of the directors’ financial positions. As indicated above, all of the above noted transactions are on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm’s length transactions. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 235 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued I6: Subsidiary undertakings (i) Principal subsidiaries The principal subsidiary undertakings of the Company at 31 December 2006, all wholly owned except PCA Life Assurance Company Limited, were: Main activity Country of Incorporation The Prudential Assurance Company Limited Prudential Annuities Limited* Prudential Retirement Income Limited (PRIL)* M&G Investment Management Limited* Egg Banking plc Jackson National Life Insurance Company* Prudential Assurance Company Singapore (Pte) Limited* PCA Life Assurance Company Limited* (99% owned) *Owned by a subsidiary undertaking of the Company. Insurance Insurance Insurance Investment management Banking Insurance Insurance Insurance England and Wales England and Wales Scotland England and Wales England and Wales US Singapore Taiwan Each subsidiary has one class of ordinary shares and operates mainly in its country of incorporation, except for PRIL which operates mainly in England and Wales. In January 2007, the Company announced that it had entered into a binding agreement to sell Egg Banking plc to Citi as set out in note I8. (ii) Dividend restrictions and minimum capital requirements Certain Group subsidiaries are subject to restrictions on the amount of funds they may transfer in the form of cash dividends or otherwise to the parent company. UK insurance companies are required to maintain solvency margins which must be supported by capital reserves and other resources, including unrealised gains on investments. Jackson can pay dividends on its capital stock only out of earned surplus unless prior regulatory approval is obtained. Furthermore, without the prior regulatory approval, dividends cannot be distributed if all dividends made within the preceding 12 months exceed the greater of Jackson’s statutory net gain from operations or 10 per cent of Jackson statutory surplus for the prior year. In 2007, the maximum amount of dividends that can be paid by Jackson without prior regulatory approval is US$412 million (£211 million) (in 2006: US$565 million (£329 million)). The Group’s Asian subsidiaries, mainly the Singapore and Malaysia businesses, may remit dividends to the Group, in general, provided the statutory insurance fund meets the capital adequacy standard required under local statutory regulations. PAC and Jackson are the two principal insurance subsidiaries of the Group, which together comprise approximately 76 per cent (2005: 77 per cent) of total Group assets. At 31 December 2006, the PAC long-term fund’s excess of available capital resources over its regulatory requirement (as per line 42 of Form 2 of the PAC FSA regulatory returns) was estimated to be £9.7 billion (2005: £6.0 billion) and the statutory capital and surplus of Jackson was US$3.7 billion (£1.9 billion) (2005: US$3.4 billion (£2.0 billion)). The Group capital position statement for life assurance businesses is set out in note D5. (iii) Acquisition of subsidiaries 2006 In December 2005, the Company announced its intention to acquire the minority interests in Egg representing approximately 21.7 per cent of the existing issued share capital of Egg. The whole of the minority interests were acquired in the first half of 2006. Under the terms of the offer, Egg shareholders received 0.2237 new ordinary shares in the Company for each Egg share resulting in the issue of 41.6 million new shares in the Company. The Company accounts for the purchase of minority interests using the economic entity method. Accordingly, £167 million has been charged to retained earnings representing the difference between the consideration paid (including expenses) of £251 million and the share of net assets acquired of £84 million. In January 2007, as described in note I8, the Company announced that it had agreed to sell its holding in Egg. 2005 On 18 May 2005, the Group purchased, in exchange for £142 million in cash, 100 per cent of the share capital of Life Insurance Company of Georgia, a life insurance company domiciled in the US, from ING Groep N.V. (ING). The results of Life Insurance Company of Georgia’s operations have been included in the consolidated financial statements commencing 18 May 2005, and contributed £4 million to the consolidated net profit. 236 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements I6: Subsidiary undertakings continued The carrying value immediately prior to acquisition of the assets and liabilities of Life Insurance Company of Georgia was as follows: Assets Financial investments Reinsurer’s share of policyholder liability provision Tax recoverable Other assets Cash and cash equivalents Total assets Equity and liabilities Equity Liabilities Insurance contract liabilities Other non-insurance liabilities Total liabilities Total equity and liabilities 2005 £m 920 12 4 6 47 989 141 837 11 848 989 A fair value adjustment of £1 million was made, representing the value of in-force business on acquisition. As indicated above, this amount may be adjusted depending upon the outcome of arbitration proceedings. There is currently no goodwill recorded on acquisition. Group revenue and consolidated net profit for the year ended 31 December 2005 are shown on a pro forma basis below as if the Life Insurance Company of Georgia acquisition took place on 1 January 2005. These pro forma amounts have been derived by adding pre-acquisition revenue and other components of net profit to these items included in the Group’s consolidated income statement. Earned premiums, net of reinsurance Investment and other income Total revenue Profit after tax for the year Pro forma 2005 £m 15,050 26,119 41,169 768 (iv) PAC with-profits fund acquisition The PAC with-profits fund acquired a number of venture capital holdings through PPM Capital in which the Group is deemed to have a controlling interest, in aggregate with, if applicable, other holdings held by, for example, the PSPS. There were three such acquisitions in 2006 and 2005. These were acquisitions for: 2006 • 53 per cent of the voting equity interests of Histoire D’or, a jewellery retail company, in April 2006; • 51 per cent of the voting equity interests of Azzuri Communications, a business IT service company, in June 2006; and • 60 per cent of the voting equity interests of Paramount plc, a restaurant company, in September 2006. 2005 • 40 per cent of the voting equity interests of Aperio Group Pty Ltd (AeP), a flexible packaging manufacturing company, in May 2005; • 75 per cent of the voting equity interests of Jost Luxembourg S.a.r.l. (JOST), a manufacturer of components of the truck and trailer industry, in August 2005; and • 75 per cent of the voting equity interests of BST Safety Textiles Luxembourg S.a.r.l. (BST), an airbag production company, in August 2005. These acquisitions are considered individually immaterial and therefore all information relating to ventures acquisitions has been presented in aggregate throughout this note. Due to the nature of venture investments, it is not practicable to provide certain information for those acquisitions, including the pro forma Group revenue and consolidated net profit information as if the acquisitions had occurred at the beginning of the year, and the carrying amounts, in accordance with IFRS, of each class of the acquirees’ assets, liabilities, and contingent liabilities immediately before acquisition. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 237 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements continued I6: Subsidiary undertakings continued The results of the aggregated ventures acquisitions in 2006 and 2005 have been included in the consolidated financial statements of the Group commencing on the respective dates of acquisition and contributed a loss of £7.7 million (2005: loss of £0.1 million) to earnings within the income statement, which is also reflected as part of the change in unallocated surplus of the with-profits fund. The table below identifies the net assets of these acquisitions and minor business purchases by existing venture holdings. This reconciles the net assets to the consideration paid in 2006 and 2005: Fair value Fair value on acquisition on acquisition 2005 £m 2006 £m Cash and cash equivalents Other current assets Property, plant and equipment Intangible assets other than goodwill Other non-current assets Less liabilities, including current liabilities and borrowings Less minority interests Net assets acquired Goodwill Cash consideration 18 31 45 139 100 (581) (248) 0 (248) 336 88 29 144 82 75 5 (437) (102) (1) (103) 105 2 Aggregate goodwill of £336 million (2005: £105 million) has been recognised for the excess of the cost over the Group’s interest in the net fair value of the entities’ assets, liabilities, and contingent liabilities acquired in 2006. (v) PAC with-profits fund disposals 2006 In 2006, Upperpoint Distribution Limited, Taverner Hotel Group Pty Ltd, Orefi, Aperio Group Pty Ltd and BST Safety Textiles Luxembourg S.a.r.l., all venture subsidiaries of the PAC with-profits fund, were disposed of for cash consideration of £133 million. Goodwill of £46 million and cash and cash equivalents of £19 million were disposed of. Note that, in addition, one venture subsidiary was classified as held for sale at 31 December 2006 (see note H9). 2005 In 2005, the Astron Group Ltd, Barracuda Group Ltd, Saint Clair Luxembourg S.a.r.l., RAL Holdings Ltd, Roventa-Henex Holdings SA and Global Brands Co. Inc., all venture subsidiaries of the PAC with-profits fund, were disposed of for cash consideration of £284 million. Goodwill of £312 million and cash and cash equivalents of £32 million were disposed of. Note that, in addition, two venture subsidiaries were classified as held for sale at 31 December 2005 (see note H9). I7: Commitments (i) Operating leases The Group leases various offices to conduct its business. Leases in which a significant portion of the risks and rewards of ownership are retained by the lessor are classified as operating leases. Payments made under operating leases (net of any incentives received from the lessor) are charged to the income statement on a straight-line basis over the period of the lease. 2006 £m 2005 £m Future minimum lease payments for non-cancellable operating leases fall due during the following periods: Not later than 1 year Later than 1 year and not later than 5 years Later than 5 years 53 142 160 61 186 204 The total minimum future sublease rentals to be received on non-cancellable operating leases for land and buildings for the year ended 31 December 2006 was £1 million (2005: £2 million). Minimum lease rental payments for the year ended 31 December 2006 of £50 million (2005: £55 million) are included in the consolidated income statement. (ii) Capital commitments The Group has provided, from time to time, certain guarantees and commitments to third parties including funding the purchase or development of land and buildings and other related matters. At 31 December 2006, the aggregate amount of contractual obligations to purchase and develop investment properties amounted to £146 million (2005: £199 million). The vast majority of these commitments have been made by the PAC with-profits fund. 238 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the Group financial statements I8: Post-balance sheet events – sale of Egg Banking plc On 29 January 2007, the Company announced that it had entered into a binding agreement to sell Egg Banking plc, Prudential’s UK banking business, to Citi. Under the terms of the agreement, the consideration payable to the Company by Citi is £575 million in cash, subject to adjustments to reflect any change in net asset value between 31 December 2006 and completion. In addition, the Company has agreed in principle, outline terms with Citi with respect to a UK distribution agreement through which Prudential will provide life and pensions products to Egg’s customer base for a five-year period. The Company has also been selected as a strategic provider to Citi for the distribution of life insurance products to Citi’s consumer banking customers in Thailand, Indonesia and the Philippines. The transaction is subject to regulatory approval and is expected to complete by the end of April 2007. I9: Foreign exchange translation Foreign currency profit and losses have been translated at average exchange rates for the year. Foreign currency assets and liabilities have been translated at year end rates of exchange. The principal exchange rates applied are: Local currency: £ Hong Kong Japan Malaysia Singapore Taiwan US I10: Cash flows Closing rate at 31 Dec 2006 15.22 233.20 6.90 3.00 63.77 1.96 Average for 2006 14.32 214.34 6.76 2.93 59.95 1.84 Closing rate at 31 Dec 2005 13.31 202.63 6.49 2.85 56.38 1.72 Average for 2005 14.15 200.13 6.89 3.03 58.47 1.82 Opening rate at 1 Jan 2005 14.92 196.73 7.30 3.13 60.84 1.92 Structural borrowings of shareholder-financed operations comprise core debt of the parent company and related finance subsidiaries, Jackson surplus notes and Egg debenture loans. Core debt excludes borrowings to support short-term fixed income securities programmes and non-recourse borrowings of investment subsidiaries of shareholder-financed operations. Cash flows in respect of these borrowings are included within cash flows from operating activities. Structural borrowings of with-profits operations relate solely to the £100 million 8.5 per cent undated subordinated guaranteed bonds which contribute to the solvency base of SAIF. Cash flows on other borrowings of with-profits funds, which principally relate to venture investment subsidiaries, are categorised as operating. Cash flows relating to discontinued operations, as detailed in note F6, are £nil and outflows of £5 million for 2006 and 2005 respectively. The outflows for 2005 are included in cash flows from operating activities. I11: 2005 balance sheet P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I Reanalysis of assets and liabilities for acquired venture investment subsidiaries of the PAC with-profits sub-fund Prior to 2006, no intangible assets other than goodwill had been identified for the acquired venture investment subsidiaries of the PAC with-profits sub-fund. In 2006, the Group re-evaluated the nature of the acquired assets and liabilities of those companies and has determined that there are some intangible assets that fall under the scope of IAS 38, ‘Intangible Assets’, and require separate identification. The Group has consequently altered the allocation between goodwill, intangible assets, and other assets and liabilities. No adjustment to the profits or amounts recorded for the individual line items in the income statement for 2005 was necessary. Accordingly, this reallocation has no effect on 2005 profit before or after tax or on shareholders’ equity at 31 December 2005. Certain reclassifications have been made to the balances presented in the comparative balance sheet at 31 December 2005 to conform this balance sheet to the current presentation as a result of this reallocation. The impact of the reclassifications is as follows: P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V £m Intangible assets attributable to the PAC with-profits sub-fund: Goodwill Other intangible assets Other debtors Unallocated surplus of with-profits funds Deferred tax liabilities (188) 260 (13) 27 (86) Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 239 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Balance sheet of the parent company Balance sheet of the parent company 31 December 2006 Fixed assets Investments: Shares in subsidiary undertakings Loans to subsidiary undertakings Current assets Debtors: Derivative assets Amounts owed by subsidiary undertakings Other debtors Cash at bank and in hand Less liabilities: amounts falling due within one year Commercial paper Other borrowings Derivative liabilities Amounts owed to subsidiary undertakings Tax payable Sundry creditors Accruals and deferred income Net current liabilities Total assets less current liabilities Less liabilities: amounts falling due after more than one year Subordinated liabilities Debenture loans Other borrowings Amounts owed to subsidiary undertakings Total net assets (excluding pensions) Pension assets (liabilities) (net of related deferred tax) Total net assets (including pensions) Capital and reserves Share capital Share premium Profit and loss account Shareholders’ funds Note 2006 £m 2005 £m 4 4 7 6 6 7 6 6 6 8 9 9 10 10 6,085 2,841 8,926 5,175 2,697 7,872 17 2,057 42 255 2,371 (2,017) (5) (100) (667) (290) (26) (42) 41 1,577 56 121 1,795 (1,461) – (144) (805) (171) (37) (41) (3,147) (2,659) (776) (864) 8,150 7,008 (1,533) (797) (10) (2,532) (1,646) (798) (11) (2,016) (4,872) (4,471) 3,278 34 3,312 122 1,822 1,368 3,312 2,537 (80) 2,457 119 1,564 774 2,457 The financial statements of the parent company on pages 240 to 249 were approved by the Board of directors on 14 March 2007. Sir David Clementi Chairman Mark Tucker Group Chief Executive Philip Broadley Group Finance Director 240 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the parent company financial statement Notes on the parent company financial statement 1. Nature of operations Prudential plc (the Company) is a parent holding company. The Company together with its subsidiaries (collectively, the Group) is an international financial services group with its principal operations in the UK, the US and Asia. The Group operates in the UK through its subsidiaries, primarily The Prudential Assurance Company Limited, Prudential Annuities Limited, Prudential Retirement Income Limited, M&G Group Limited and Egg Banking plc. In the US, the Group’s principal subsidiary is Jackson National Life Insurance Company. In Asia, the Group’s main operations are in Hong Kong, Malaysia, Singapore and Taiwan. The Company is responsible for the financing of each of its subsidiaries except Egg, which is responsible for its own financing. 2. Basis of preparation The financial statements of the Company, which comprise the balance sheet and related notes, are prepared in accordance with Section 226 of, and Schedule 4 to, the Companies Act 1985, which apply to companies generally. The Company has taken advantage of the exemption under Section 230 of the Companies Act 1985 from presenting its own profit and loss account. The financial statements are prepared in accordance with applicable accounting standards under UK Generally Accepted Accounting Practice (UK GAAP), including Financial Reporting Standards (FRS) and Statements of Standard Accounting Practice (SSAP). The Company has not prepared a cash flow statement on the basis that its cash flow is included within the cash flow statement in the consolidated financial statements. The Company is also exempt under the terms of FRS 8 from disclosing related party transactions with entities that are part of the Group or investees of the Group. In addition, the Company has taken advantage of the exemption within FRS 25, ‘Financial Instruments: Disclosure and Presentation’ from the disclosure requirements of this standard on the basis that the Company is included in the publicly available consolidated financial statements of the Group which include disclosures that comply with IAS 32, ‘Financial Instruments: Disclosure and Presentation’, which is equivalent to FRS 25. 3. Significant accounting policies Changes in accounting policies The Company has early adopted the amendment to FRS 17 issued in December 2006 in preparing the results for the year ended 31 December 2006. The main effect of this amendment is to replace the existing disclosure requirements of FRS 17 with those of IAS 19 ‘Employee Benefits’. The amended disclosures are shown in note 8. The measurement change from this amendment where pension assets should now be valued at current bid value rather than mid-market value, has an immaterial effect on the Company’s results. Significant accounting policies Shares in subsidiary undertakings Shares in subsidiary undertakings in the balance sheet of the Company are shown at the lower of cost and estimated realisable value. Loans to subsidiary undertakings Loans to subsidiary undertakings in the balance sheet of the Company are shown at cost, less provisions. Derivatives Derivative financial instruments are used to reduce or manage interest rate and currency exposures. The Company’s policy is that amounts at risk through derivative transactions are covered by cash or by corresponding assets. Derivative financial instruments are carried at fair value with changes in fair value included in the profit and loss account. Under FRS 26 ‘Financial Instruments Measurement’, hedge accounting is permissible only if certain criteria are met regarding the establishment of documentation and continued measurement of hedge effectiveness. For derivative financial instruments designated as fair value hedges, the movements in the fair value are recorded in the profit and loss account with the accompanying change in fair value of the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk. Borrowings Borrowings are initially recognised at fair value, net of transaction costs, and subsequently accounted for on an amortised cost basis using the effective interest method. Under the effective interest method, the difference between the redemption value of the borrowing and the initial proceeds (net of related issue costs) is amortised through the profit and loss account to the date of maturity. Dividends Dividends are recognised in the period in which they are declared. Dividends declared after the balance sheet date in respect of the prior reporting period are treated as a non-adjusting event. Where scrip dividends are issued, the value of such shares, measured as the amount of the cash dividend alternative, is credited to reserves and the amount in excess of the nominal value of the shares issued is transferred from the share premium account to retained profit. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 241 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the parent company financial statement Notes on the parent company financial statement continued 3. Significant accounting policies continued Share premium The difference between the proceeds received on issue of shares, net of issue costs, and the nominal value of the shares issued is credited to the share premium account. Foreign currency translation Foreign currency borrowings that have been used to finance or provide a hedge against Group equity investments in overseas subsidiaries, are translated at year end exchange rates. The impact of these currency translations is recorded within the profit and loss account for the year. Other assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are also converted at year end exchange rates with the related foreign currency exchange gains or losses reflected in the profit and loss account for the year. Tax Current tax expense is charged or credited to operations based upon amounts estimated to be payable or recoverable as a result of taxable operations for the current year. To the extent that losses of an individual UK company are not offset in any one year, they can be carried back for one year or carried forward indefinitely to be offset against profits arising from the same company. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognised in accordance with the provisions of FRS 19. The Company has chosen not to apply the option available of recognising such assets and liabilities on a discounted basis to reflect the time value of money. Except as set out in FRS 19, deferred tax is recognised in respect of all timing differences that have originated but not reversed by the balance sheet date. Deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is regarded as more likely than not that they will be recovered. The Group’s UK subsidiaries each file separate tax returns. In accordance with UK tax legislation, where one domestic UK company is a 75 per cent owned subsidiary of another UK company or both are 75 per cent owned subsidiaries of a common parent, the companies are considered to be within the same UK tax group. For companies within the same tax group, trading profits and losses arising in the same accounting period may be offset for the purposes of determining current and deferred taxes. Pensions The Company assumes a portion of the pension surplus or deficit of the Group’s largest pension scheme, the Prudential Staff Pension Scheme (PSPS). Further details are disclosed in note 8. The Company applies the requirements of FRS 17 (as amended in December 2006) to its portion of PSPS surplus or deficit. A pension surplus or deficit is recorded as the difference between the present value of the scheme liabilities and the fair value of the scheme assets. The assets and liabilities of the defined benefit pension schemes of the Prudential Group are subject to a full triennial actuarial valuation using the projected unit method. Estimated future cashflows are then discounted at a high quality corporate bond rate to determine its present value. These calculations are performed by independent actuaries. The aggregate of the actuarially determined service costs of the currently employed personnel and the unwind of the discount on liabilities at the start of the period, less the expected investment return on the scheme assets at the start of the period, is recognised in the profit and loss account. Actuarial gains and losses as a result of the changes in assumptions, the difference between actual and expected investment return on scheme assets or experience variances are recorded in the statement of total recognised gains and losses. 242 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the parent company financial statement 4. Investments of the Company At beginning of year Impairment provision against investment in Egg Other impairment provision Additional investment in subsidiary undertakings* Exchange rate movements Net advance of loans Provision against loans At end of year Shares in subsidiary Loans to subsidiary undertakings undertakings 2006 £m 2006 £m 5,175 (301) (10) 1,221 – – – 2,697 – – – (2) 197 (51) 6,085 2,841 *This amount principally comprises increases in the carrying value of subsidiaries consequent to an internal corporate reorganisation and the purchase of the Egg minority interests. 5. Subsidiary undertakings The principal subsidiary undertakings of the Company at 31 December 2006, all wholly owned except PCA Life Assurance Company Limited, were: The Prudential Assurance Company Limited Prudential Annuities Limited* Prudential Retirement Income Limited (PRIL)* M&G Investment Management Limited* Egg Banking plc Jackson National Life Insurance Company* Prudential Assurance Company Singapore (Pte) Limited* PCA Life Assurance Company Limited* (99% owned) *Owned by a subsidiary undertaking of the Company. Main activity Country of incorporation Insurance Insurance Insurance Investment management Banking Insurance Insurance Insurance England and Wales England and Wales Scotland England and Wales England and Wales US Singapore Taiwan Each subsidiary has one class of ordinary shares and operates mainly in its country of incorporation, except for PRIL which operates mainly in England and Wales. Egg Banking plc was a subsidiary of Egg plc. At 31 December 2005, the ordinary shares of Egg plc were listed and there was only one class of shares of which 78 per cent was owned by the Company, one per cent owned by other companies within the Prudential Group and 21 per cent owned by shareholders external to the Prudential Group. In December 2005, the Company announced its intention to acquire the minority interests in Egg and the whole of those interests were acquired in the first half of 2006. Under the terms of the offer, Egg shareholders received 0.2237 new ordinary shares in the Company for each Egg share resulting in the issue of 41.6 million new shares in the Company. In January 2007, the Company announced that it had entered into a binding agreement to sell Egg Banking plc to Citi, as set out in note 14. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 243 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the parent company financial statement Notes on the parent company financial statement continued 6. Borrowings Long-term loans Other borrowings Total 2006 £m Core structural borrowings: 248 £249m 5.5% Bonds 2009 (note i) 335 ¤500m 5.75% Subordinated Notes 2021 (note ii) 300 £300m 6.875% Bonds 2023 249 £250m 5.875% Bonds 2029 427 £435m 6.125% Subordinated Notes 2031 484 US$1,000m 6.5% Perpetual Subordinated Capital Securities (note iii) 125 US$250m 6.75% Perpetual Subordinated Capital Securities (note iv) US$300m 6.5% Perpetual Subordinated Capital Securities (notes iv and v) 149 13 ¤20m Medium Term Subordinated Notes 2023 (note vi) 2005 £m 249 341 300 249 426 554 142 169 14 2006 £m 2005 £m – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – 2006 £m 248 335 300 249 427 484 125 149 13 2005 £m 249 341 300 249 426 554 142 169 14 2,330 2,444 Total core structural borrowings Other borrowings (note vii): Commercial paper Floating Rate Notes 2007 Medium Term Notes 2010 Total borrowings Borrowings are repayable as follows: Within 1 year or on demand Between 2 and 5 years After 5 years Total borrowings Recorded in the balance sheet as: Subordinated liabilities Debenture loans 2,330 2,444 – – – – – – 2,330 2,444 2,017 5 10 2,032 1,461 – 11 1,472 2,017 5 10 4,362 1,461 – 11 3,916 Long-term loans Other borrowings Total 2006 £m 2005 £m 2006 £m 2005 £m 2006 £m 2005 £m 2,022 10 – 2,032 1,461 11 – 1,472 2,022 258 2,082 4,362 1,461 260 2,195 3,916 – 248 2,082 2,330 1,533 797 2,330 – 249 2,195 2,444 1,646 798 2,444 Notes (i) In February 2006, £1.3 million of the original bond issue of £250 million was redeemed. (ii) The ¤500 million 5.75 per cent borrowings have been swapped into borrowings of £333 million with interest payable at six month £Libor plus 0.962 per cent. (iii) Interest on the US$1,000 million 6.5 per cent borrowings has been swapped into floating rate payments at three month US$Libor plus 0.80 per cent. (iv) These debts are exchangeable into preference shares at Prudential’s option. (v) Interest on the US$300 million 6.5 per cent borrowings has been swapped into floating rate payments at three month US$Libor plus 0.0225 per cent. In 2006, the borrowings have been designated for hedge accounting at the Group consolidated level, but not at the Company level. (vi) The ¤20 million Medium Term Subordinated Notes were issued at 20-year Euro Constant Maturity Swap (capped at 6.5 per cent). These have been swapped into borrowings of £14 million with interest payable at three month £Libor plus 1.2 per cent. (vii) These borrowings support a short-term fixed income securities programme. (viii) Under the terms of the Group’s arrangements with its main UK banker, the bank has a right of set off between credit balances (other than those of long-term funds) and all overdrawn balances of those Group undertakings with similar arrangements. (ix) The interests of the holders of the Subordinated Notes and the Subordinated Capital Securities are subordinate to the entitlements of other creditors of the Company. 244 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the parent company financial statement 7. Derivative financial instruments The table below analyses the fair value of derivatives of the Company at 31 December: Derivative financial instruments held to manage interest rate and currency profile: Interest rate swaps Cross-currency swaps Inflation-linked swap Forward foreign currency contracts Total 2006 2005 Fair value assets £m Fair value liabilities £m Fair value assets £m Fair value liabilities £m 12 5 – – 17 27 2 67 4 100 29 12 – – 41 22 2 82 38 144 The change in fair value of the derivative financial instruments of the Company was a gain before tax of £131 million (2005: a loss before tax of £85 million). The Company has a US$1,000 million fair value hedge in place which hedges the interest exposure on the US$1,000 million 6.5 per cent perpetual subordinated capital securities. During 2006, the Company entered into a transaction to extend the term of the interest-rate swap of this hedging relationship from 30 years to 50 years. The derivative financial instruments were valued internally using standard market practices. In accordance with the Company’s risk management framework, all internally generated valuations are subject to independent assessment against external counterparties’ valuations. 8. Pension scheme financial position The majority of UK Prudential staff are members of the Group’s pension schemes. The largest scheme is the Prudential Staff Pension Scheme (PSPS). This scheme is primarily a defined benefit scheme but no employees with employment offers after 31 July 2003 are eligible for membership of the defined benefit section of the scheme. At 31 December 2006, on the FRS 17, ‘Retirement Benefits’ basis of valuation, PSPS accounts for 88 per cent (2005: 89 per cent) of the liabilities of the Group’s defined benefit schemes. For the purposes of preparing consolidated financial statements, the Group applies IFRS basis accounting including IAS 19, ‘Employee Benefits’. However, the individual accounts of the Company continue to apply UK GAAP. For 2006, this includes the early adoption of the amendment to FRS 17 issued in December 2006 which aligns the FRS 17 disclosures with IAS 19. During 2005, the allocation of surpluses and deficits attaching to PSPS between the Company and the unallocated surplus of the Prudential Assurance Company’s (PAC) with-profits funds was clarified. The surpluses or deficits of PSPS have been apportioned based on the weighted cumulative activity attaching to the contributions paid into the scheme in the past. Prior to 2005, 20 per cent of the deficit has been attributed to the Company and 80 per cent to the PAC with-profits fund. At 31 December 2005, the deficit of PSPS was apportioned in the ratio 30/70 between the Company and the PAC with-profits fund following detailed consideration of the sourcing of previous contributions. This ratio has continued to be applied for 2006 to movements in the financial position that relate to opening assets and liabilities. However, the FRS 17 service charge and ongoing employer contributions, are allocated by reference to the cost allocation for current activity. The projected unit method was used for the most recent full actuarial valuation. Defined benefit schemes are generally required to be subject to full actuarial valuation every three years to assess the appropriate level of funding for schemes having regard to their commitments. These valuations include assessments of the likely rate of return on the assets held within the separate trustee administered funds. PSPS was last actuarially valued as at 5 April 2005 and this valuation demonstrated the scheme to be 94 per cent funded, with a shortfall of actuarially determined assets to liabilities of six per cent, representing a deficit of £243 million. P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I The finalisation of the valuation as at 5 April 2005 was accompanied by changes to the basis of funding for the scheme. For 2006 and future years, deficit funding amounts designed to eliminate the actuarial deficit over a 10-year period have been and are being made. Total contributions to the scheme for deficit funding and employer contributions for ongoing service for current employees are expected to be of the order of £70 to 75 million per annum over a 10-year period. However, in 2006, total contributions for the year to 5 April 2006 were £137 million. This amount reflects the increased level of current contributions for ongoing service and deficit funding backdated to 6 April 2005. These amounts compared to total contributions in 2005 of £19 million. P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Using external actuarial advice provided by the professionally qualified actuaries, Watson Wyatt Partners, for the valuation of PSPS, the most recent full valuations have been updated to 31 December 2006 applying the principles prescribed by FRS 17. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 245 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the parent company financial statement Notes on the parent company financial statement continued 8. Pension scheme financial position continued The key assumptions adopted were: Price inflation Rate of increase in salaries Rate of increase in pension payments for inflation: Guaranteed (maximum 5%) Guaranteed (maximum 2.5%) Discretionary Rate used to discount scheme liabilities Long-term expected rate of return Equities Bonds Properties Other assets Weighted average long-term expected rate of return 2006 % 3.0 5.0 3.0 2.5 2.5 5.2 2006 % 7.5 4.9 6.8 5.0 5.9 2005 % 2.8 4.8 2.8 2.5 2.5 4.8 2005 % 7.1 4.5 6.4 4.5 6.1 The long-term expected rates of return have been determined after applying due consideration to the requirements of paragraph 54 of FRS 17, in particular, taking account of the values of the assets. Further details on the PSPS scheme, including mortality assumptions, are shown in note I1 ‘Staff and Pension Plans’ of the notes on the financial statements of the Group. The assets and liabilities of PSPS were: 31 Dec 2006 31 Dec 2005 31 Dec 2004 Equities Bonds Properties Other assets Total value of assets Present value of scheme liabilities Surplus (deficit) in the scheme Allocated as: Attributable to the PAC with-profits fund Attributable to the Company After deducting deferred tax, the amounts reflected in the balance sheet of the Company are: % 28.3 43.8 12.2 15.7 100.0 Value £m 1,346 2,077 580 745 4,748 4,607 141 93 48 141 34 % 52.1 33.9 12.3 1.7 100.0 Value £m 2,293 1,490 539 75 4,397 4,776 (379) (265) (114) (379) (80) The change in the present value of the scheme liabilities and the change in the fair value of the assets is as follows: Present value of scheme liabilities, beginning of year Service costs – current Service costs – past Interest Employee contributions Actuarial (gains) losses Benefit payments Present value of scheme liabilities, end of year 246 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Value £m 2,366 898 490 56 3,810 4,399 (589) (470) (119) (589) (83) 2006 £m 4,776 47 – 226 1 (249) (194) 4,607 % 62.1 23.6 12.9 1.4 100.0 2005 £m 4,399 44 (115) 228 0 405 (185) 4,776 Group financial statements Notes on the parent company financial statement 8. Pension scheme financial position continued Fair value of pension scheme assets, beginning of year Expected return on pension scheme assets Employee contributions Employer contributions* Actuarial and other gains Benefit payments Fair value of pension scheme assets, end of year *The contributions include deficit funding and ongoing contributions. Pension charge and actuarial gains (losses) of PSPS Pension charge Operating charge: Current service cost Past service cost Finance income (expense): Interest on pension scheme liabilities Expected return on pension scheme assets Total pension (charge) credit Less: amount attributable to the PAC with-profits fund Pension (charge) credit attributable to the Company Actuarial gains (losses) Actual less expected return on scheme assets (3% (2005: 11%) (2004: 3%) of assets) Experience gains (losses) on scheme liabilities (0% (2005: 0%) (2004: 1%) of liabilities) Changes in assumptions underlying the present value of scheme liabilities* Total actuarial gains (losses) (9% (2005: 2%) (2004: (1)%) of the present value of the scheme liabilities) Less: amount attributable to PAC with-profits fund Less: additional losses on change of estimate of allocation of opening PSPS deficit between the Company and the PAC with-profits fund Actuarial gains (losses) attributable to the Company *In 2006, a £37 million actuarial loss was recognised relating to the measurement of the death-in-service benefits. The total actual return on scheme assets for PSPS was £407 million (2005: £753 million). 2006 £m 4,397 266 1 137 141 (194) 4,748 2005 £m 3,810 253 0 19 500 (185) 4,397 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B 2006 £m 2005 £m C (47) – (226) 266 40 (7) (6) (13) 2005 £m 500 – (405) 95 (66) 29 (59) (30) (44) 115 (228) 253 25 96 (67) 29 2004 £m 104 (25) (128) (49) 39 (10) – (10) 2006 £m 141 17 232 390 (272) 118 – 118 D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V The actuarial gains before tax of £118 million (2005: actuarial losses of £30 million) attributable to the Company are recorded in the statement of total recognised gains and losses. Cumulative actuarial gains as at 31 December 2006 amount to £143 million (2005: £25 million). The additional loss of £59 million in 2005 reflects the changed estimate of allocation in the deficit of PSPS from a ratio of 20/80 between the Company and the PAC with-profits fund prior to 2005 to a ratio of 30/70 from 2005 onwards. Total employer contributions expected to be paid into the PSPS defined benefit scheme for the year ended 31 December 2007 amount to £75 million. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 247 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Notes on the parent company financial statement Notes on the parent company financial statement continued 9. Share capital and share premium The authorised share capital of the Company is £220 million (2005: £170 million) (divided into 4,000,000,000 (2005: 3,000,000,000) ordinary shares of 5 pence each and 2,000,000,000 sterling preference shares of 1 pence each) and US$20 million (divided into 2,000,000,000 US dollar preference shares of 1 cent each) and ¤20 million (divided into 2,000,000,000 Euro preference shares of 1 cent each). None of the preference shares has been issued. A summary of the ordinary shares in issue is set out below: Issued shares of 5 pence each fully paid At beginning of year Shares issued under share option schemes Shares issued in lieu of cash dividends Shares issued in respect of acquisition of Egg minority interests Transfer to retained profit in respect of shares issued in lieu of cash dividends At end of year Number of shares 2,386,784,266 2,953,552 12,940,993 41,633,614 – 2,444,312,425 Share capital 2006 £m 119 – 1 2 – 122 Share premium 2006 £m 1,564 15 75 243 (75) 1,822 At 31 December 2006, there were options subsisting under share option schemes to subscribe for 10,722,274 (2005: 12,503,956) shares at prices ranging from 266 pence to 715 pence (2005: 266 pence to 715 pence) and exercisable by the year 2013 (2005: 2012). In addition, there were 4,113,481 (2005: 4,668,534) conditional options outstanding under the Restricted Share Plan exercisable at nil cost in the balance of a 10-year period. No further options will be issued under the Restricted Share Plan which has been replaced by the Group Performance Share Plan. There were 1,623,637 (2005: nil) conditional options outstanding under the Group Performance Share Plan exercisable at nil cost in the balance of a 10-year period. Further information on the Group’s employee share options is given in note I2 ‘Share-based payments’ of the notes on the financial statements of the Group. 10. Profit of the Company and reconciliation of movement in shareholders’ funds The profit after tax of the Company for the year was £834 million (2005: £118 million). After dividends of £398 million (2005: £378 million), actuarial gains net of tax in respect of the pension scheme of £83 million (2005: losses of £21 million) and a transfer from the share premium account of £75 million (2005: £51 million) in respect of shares issued in lieu of cash dividends, retained profit at 31 December 2006 amounted to £1,368 million (2005: £774 million). The Company employs no staff. Fees payable to the Company’s auditor for the audit of the Company’s annual accounts were £0.1 million (2005: £0.1 million). In addition, the Company paid fees for other services of £0.6 million (2005: £0.6 million), which were wholly for services relating to corporate finance transactions. A reconciliation of the movement in the shareholders’ funds of the Company for the years ended 31 December 2006 and 2005 is given below: 2006 £m Profit for the year Dividends Actuarial gains (losses) recognised in respect of the pension scheme net of related tax (note 8) New share capital subscribed (note 9) Net movement in shareholders’ funds Shareholders’ funds at beginning of year Shareholders’ funds at end of year 834 (398) 436 83 336 855 2,457 3,312 2005 £m 118 (378) (260) (21) 55 (226) 2,683 2,457 248 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Notes on the parent company financial statement 11. Directors’ remuneration Information on directors’ remuneration is given in the directors’ remuneration report section within this Annual Report. Further information on the transactions of the directors with the Company and the Group is given in notes I3 ‘Key management remuneration’ and I5 ‘Related party transactions’ of the notes on the financial statements of the Group. 12. Dividends A final dividend of 11.72 pence per share was proposed by the directors on 14 March 2007. Subject to shareholders’ approval, the dividend will be paid on 22 May 2007 to shareholders on the register at the close of business on 13 April 2007. The dividend will absorb an estimated £287 million of shareholders’ funds. A scrip dividend alternative will be offered to shareholders. 13. Guarantees The Company provides a guarantee for the £150 million principal amount of the 9.375 per cent bonds due 2007, which have been issued by one of its finance subsidiaries. In certain instances the Company has also guaranteed that other subsidiaries will meet their obligations when they fall due for payment. 14. Post-balance sheet events On 29 January 2007, the Company announced that it had entered into a binding agreement to sell Egg Banking plc, Prudential’s UK banking business, to Citi. Under the terms of the agreement, the consideration payable to the Company by Citi is £575 million in cash, subject to adjustment to reflect any change in net asset value between 31 December 2006 and completion. As a consequence of this agreement, it is appropriate to impair the carrying value of the Company’s investment by £301 million as shown in note 4. The transaction is subject to regulatory approvals and is expected to complete by the end of April 2007. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 249 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements Statement of directors’ responsibilities in respect of the Annual Report and the financial statements Statement of directors’ responsibilities in respect of the Annual Report and the financial statements The directors are responsible for preparing the Annual Report and the Group and parent company financial statements in accordance with applicable law and regulations. Company law requires the directors to prepare Group and parent company financial statements for each financial year. Under that law the directors are required to prepare the Group financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as adopted by the European Union (EU) and have elected to prepare the parent company financial statements in accordance with UK Accounting Standards. The Group financial statements are required by law and IFRS as adopted by the EU to present fairly the financial position and performance of the Group; the Companies Act 1985 provides in relation to such financial statements that references in the relevant part of that Act to financial statements giving a true and fair view are references to their achieving a fair presentation. The parent company financial statements are required by law to give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the parent company. In preparing the Group and parent company financial statements, the directors are required to: • Select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently; • make judgements and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; • for the Group financial statements, state whether they have been prepared in accordance with IFRS as adopted by the EU; • for the parent company financial statements, state whether applicable UK Accounting Standards have been followed, subject to any material departures disclosed and explained in the parent company financial statements; and • prepare the financial statements on the going concern basis unless it is inappropriate to presume that the Group and the parent company will continue in business. The directors are responsible for keeping proper accounting records that disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the parent company and enable them to ensure that its financial statements comply with the Companies Act 1985. They have general responsibility for taking such steps as are reasonably open to them to safeguard the assets of the Group and to prevent and detect fraud and other irregularities. Under applicable law and regulations, the directors are also responsible for preparing a directors’ report, directors’ remuneration report and corporate governance statement that comply with that law and those regulations. The directors are responsible for the maintenance and integrity of the corporate and financial information included on the Company’s website. Legislation in the UK governing the preparation and dissemination of financial statements may differ from legislation in other jurisdictions. 250 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements Independent auditor’s report to the members of Prudential plc Independent auditor’s report to the members of Prudential plc We have audited the Group and parent company financial statements (the financial statements) of Prudential plc for the year ended 31 December 2006 which comprise the consolidated Group income statement, the consolidated Group and parent company balance sheets, the consolidated Group cash flow statement, the consolidated Group statement of change in shareholders’ equity and the related notes on pages 99 to 249. These financial statements have been prepared under the accounting policies set out therein. We have also audited the information in the directors’ remuneration report on pages 83 to 95 that is described as having been audited. This report is made solely to the Company’s members, as a body, in accordance with Section 235 of the Companies Act 1985. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the Company’s members those matters we are required to state to them in an auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the Company and the Company’s members as a body, for our audit work, for this report, or for the opinions we have formed. Respective responsibilities of directors and auditor The directors’ responsibilities for preparing the Annual Report and the Group financial statements in accordance with applicable law and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as adopted by the European Union (EU), and for preparing the parent company financial statements and the directors’ remuneration report in accordance with applicable law and United Kingdom Accounting Standards (United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice) are set out in the statement of directors’ responsibilities on page 250. Our responsibility is to audit the financial statements and the part of the directors’ remuneration report to be audited in accordance with relevant legal and regulatory requirements and International Standards on Auditing (UK and Ireland). We report to you our opinion as to whether the financial statements give a true and fair view and whether the financial statements and the part of the directors’ remuneration report to be audited have been properly prepared in accordance with the Companies Act 1985 and, as regards the Group financial statements, Article 4 of the International Auditing Standards Regulation. We also report to you whether in our opinion the information given in the directors’ report is consistent with the financial statements. In addition, we report to you if, in our opinion, the Company has not kept proper accounting records, if we have not received all the information and explanations we require for our audit, or if information specified by law regarding directors’ remuneration and other transactions is not disclosed. We review whether the corporate governance statement reflects the Company’s compliance with the nine provisions of the 2006 Combined Code specified for our review by the Listing Rules of the Financial Services Authority, and we report if it does not. We are not required to consider whether the Board’s statements on internal control cover all risks and controls, or form an opinion on the effectiveness of the Group’s corporate governance procedures or its risk and control procedures. We read other information contained in the Annual Report and consider whether it is consistent with the audited financial statements. We consider the implications for our report if we become aware of any apparent mis-statements or material inconsistencies with the financial statements. Our responsibilities do not extend to any other information. Basis of audit opinion We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK and Ireland) issued by the Auditing Practices Board. An audit includes examination, on a test basis, of evidence relevant to the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and the part of the directors’ remuneration report to be audited. It also includes an assessment of the significant estimates and judgements made by the directors in the preparation of the financial statements, and of whether the accounting policies are appropriate to the Group’s and Company’s circumstances, consistently applied and adequately disclosed. We planned and performed our audit so as to obtain all the information and explanations which we considered necessary in order to provide us with sufficient evidence to give reasonable assurance that the financial statements and the part of the directors’ remuneration report to be audited are free from material misstatement, whether caused by fraud or other irregularity or error. In forming our opinion we also evaluated the overall adequacy of the presentation of information in the financial statements and the part of the directors’ remuneration report to be audited. Opinion In our opinion: • the Group financial statements give a true and fair view, in accordance with IFRS as adopted by the European Union, of the state of the Group’s affairs as at 31 December 2006 and of its profit for the year then ended; • the Group financial statements have been properly prepared in accordance with the Companies Act 1985 and Article 4 of the IAS Regulation; • the parent company financial statements give a true and fair view, in accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice, of the state of the parent company’s affairs as at 31 December 2006; • the parent company financial statements and the part of the directors’ remuneration report to be audited have been properly prepared in accordance with the Companies Act 1985; and • the information given in the directors’ report is consistent with the financial statements. KPMG Audit Plc Chartered Accountants Registered Auditor London 14 March 2007 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 251 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements European Embedded Value (EEV) basis supplementary information European Embedded Value (EEV) basis supplementary information Year ended 31 December 2006 Operating profit from continuing operations based on longer-term investment returns* Results analysis by business area Note 2006 £m P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V UK operations New business Business in force Long-term business M&G Egg Total US operations New business Business in force Long-term business Broker-dealer and fund management Curian D Total Asian operations New business Business in force Long-term business Fund management Development expenses Total Other income and expenditure Investment return and other income Interest payable on core structural borrowings Corporate expenditure: Group Head Office Asia Regional Head Office Charge for share-based payments for Prudential schemes Total UK restructuring costs Operating profit from continuing operations based on longer-term investment returns Analysed as profits (losses) from: New business Business in force Long-term business Asia development expenses Other operating results UK restructuring costs Total 2005 £m 243 183 426 163 44 633 211 530 741 24 (10) 755 413 163 576 12 (20) 568 42 (175) (70) (30) (11) 266 420 686 204 (145) 745 259 449 708 18 (8) 718 514 315 829 50 (15) 864 8 (177) (83) (36) (10) (298) (244) (53) – 1,976 1,712 1,039 1,184 2,223 (15) (179) (53) 1,976 867 876 1,743 (20) (11) – 1,712 5 6 5 6 5 6 7 8 5 6 8 *EEV basis operating profit from continuing operations based on longer-term investment returns excludes goodwill impairment charges, short-term fluctuations in investment returns, the mark to market value movements on core borrowings, the shareholders’ share of actuarial and other gains and losses on defined benefit pension schemes, the effect of changes in economic assumptions and changes in the time value of cost of options and guarantees caused by economic factors. The amounts for these items are included in total EEV profit. The directors believe that operating profit, as adjusted for these items, better reflects underlying performance. Profit on ordinary activities and basic earnings per share include these items together with actual investment returns. This basis of presentation has been adopted consistently throughout this supplementary information. 252 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements European Embedded Value (EEV) basis supplementary information Summarised consolidated income statement – EEV basis Year ended 31 December 2006 Operating profit from continuing operations based on longer-term investment returns UK insurance operations M&G Egg UK operations US operations Asian operations Other income and expenditure UK restructuring costs Operating profit from continuing operations based on longer-term investment returns Goodwill impairment charge Short-term fluctuations in investment returns Mark to market value movements on core borrowings Shareholders’ share of actuarial and other gains and losses on defined benefit pension schemes Effect of changes in economic assumptions and time value of cost of options and guarantees Profit from continuing operations before tax (including actual investment returns) Shareholder tax Profit from continuing operations for the financial year after tax before minority interests Discontinued operations (net of tax) Profit for the year Attributable to: Equity holders of the Company Minority interests Profit for the year Earnings per share – EEV basis Year ended 31 December 2006 Continuing operations From operating profit, based on longer-term investment returns, after related tax and minority interests of £1,390m (2005: £1,339m) Based on profit from continuing operations after minority interests of £2,212m (2005: £1,579m) Discontinued operations Based on profit from discontinued operations after minority interests Total – based on total profit for the financial year after minority interests of £2,212m (2005: £1,582m) Average number of shares (millions) Dividends per share Year ended 31 December 2006 Dividends relating to the reporting period: Interim dividend (2006 and 2005) Final dividend (2006 and 2005) Total Dividends declared and paid in the reporting period: Current year interim dividend Final dividend for prior year Total Note 2006 £m 2005 £m 8 9 10 11 12 13 686 204 (145) 745 718 864 (298) (53) 1,976 – 745 85 207 59 3,072 (859) 2,213 – 2,213 2,212 1 2,213 426 163 44 633 755 568 (244) – 1,712 (120) 1,068 (67) (47) (302) 2,244 (653) 1,591 3 1,594 1,582 12 1,594 Note 2006 2005 14 14 57.6p 91.7p 56.6p 66.8p P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H – 91.7p 0.1p 66.9p I 2,413 2,365 2006 2005 P a r e n t c o m p a n y 5.42p 11.72p 5.30p 11.02p E E V 17.14p 16.32p 5.42p 11.02p 5.30p 10.65p 16.44p 15.95p Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 253 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements European Embedded Value (EEV) basis supplementary information European Embedded Value (EEV) basis supplementary information continued Movement in shareholders’ capital and reserves (excluding minority interests) – EEV basis Year ended 31 December 2006 Profit for the year attributable to equity shareholders of the Company Items taken directly to equity: Cumulative effect of changes in accounting policies on the adoption of IAS 32, IAS 39 and IFRS 4, net of related tax, at 1 January 2005 Unrealised valuation movements on Egg securities classified as available-for-sale Movement on cash flow hedges Exchange movements Related tax Acquisition of Egg minority interests New share capital subscribed Dividends Reserve movements in respect of share-based payments Treasury shares: Movement in own shares in respect of share-based payment plans Movement in Prudential plc shares purchased by unit trusts consolidated under IFRS Cumulative adjustments at 31 December 2006, net of related tax, for Jackson assets backing surplus and required capital Net increase in shareholders’ capital and reserves Shareholders’ capital and reserves at beginning of year (excluding minority interests) Note 2006 £m 2005 £m 2,212 1,582 – (2) 7 (359) (74) (167) 336 (399) 15 6 0 7 (25) (1) (4) 377 65 – 55 (380) 15 0 3 – 1,582 10,301 1,687 8,614 16(vi) 16 Shareholders’ capital and reserves at end of year (excluding minority interests) 15, 16 11,883 10,301 Comprising: UK operations: Long-term business M&G: Net assets Acquired goodwill Egg US operations Asian operations: Net assets Acquired goodwill Other operations: Holding company net borrowings Other net liabilities 5,813 5,132 230 1,153 292 7,488 3,360 2,637 172 245 1,153 303 6,833 3,418 2,070 172 (1,542) (232) (1,724) (468) Shareholders’ capital and reserves at end of year (excluding minority interests) 15, 16 11,883 10,301 Net asset value per share (in pence) Based on EEV basis shareholders’ funds of £11,883m (2005: £10,301m) Number of issued shares at year end (millions) 486p 2,444 432p 2,387 254 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements European Embedded Value (EEV) basis supplementary information Summarised consolidated balance sheet – EEV basis 31 December 2006 Total assets less liabilities, excluding insurance funds Less insurance funds*: Policyholder liabilities (net of reinsurers’ share) and unallocated surplus of with-profits funds Less shareholders’ accrued interest in the long-term business Total net assets Share capital Share premium Statutory basis shareholders’ reserves Additional EEV basis retained profit Note 2006 £m 2005 £m 183,130 174,231 (177,642) (169,037) 5,107 6,395 (171,247) (163,930) 16 11,883 10,301 122 1,822 3,544 6,395 119 1,564 3,511 5,107 Shareholders’ capital and reserves (excluding minority interests) 16 11,883 10,301 *Including liabilities in respect of insurance products classified as investment products under IFRS 4. The supplementary information on pages 252 to 280 was approved by the Board of directors on 14 March 2007. Sir David Clementi Chairman Mark Tucker Group Chief Executive Philip Broadley Group Finance Director Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 255 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements European Embedded Value (EEV) basis supplementary information Notes on the EEV basis supplementary information 1. Basis of preparation The EEV basis results have been prepared in accordance with the EEV principles issued by the CFO Forum of European Insurance Companies in May 2004 and expanded by the Additional Guidance on EEV Disclosures published in October 2005. Where appropriate the EEV basis results include the effects of adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). The EEV results for the Group are prepared for ‘covered business’ as defined by the EEV Principles. Covered business represents the Group’s long-term insurance business for which the value of new and in-force contracts is attributable to shareholders. The EEV basis results for the Group’s covered business are then combined with the IFRS basis results of the Group’s other operations. The definition of long-term business operations is consistent with previous practice and comprises those contracts falling under the definition of long-term insurance business for regulatory purposes together with, for US operations, contracts that are in substance the same as guaranteed investment contracts (GICs) but do not fall within the technical definition. Under the EEV Principles, the results for covered business incorporate the projected margins of attaching internal fund management. With two principal exceptions, covered business comprises the Group’s long-term business operations. The principal exceptions are for the closed Scottish Amicable Insurance Fund (SAIF) and for the presentational treatment of the financial position of two of the Group’s defined benefit pension schemes. A very small amount of UK group pensions business is also not modelled for EEV reporting purposes. SAIF is a ring-fenced sub-fund of the PAC long-term fund, established by a Court approved Scheme of Arrangement in October 1997. SAIF is closed to new business and the assets and liabilities of the fund are wholly attributable to the policyholders of the fund. In 2006, a bulk annuity arrangement between SAIF and Prudential Retirement Income Limited (PRIL), a shareholder-owned subsidiary, took place as explained in note 5a. Reflecting the altered economic interest from SAIF policyholders to Prudential shareholders, this arrangement represents a transfer from business of the Group that is not ‘covered’ to business that is ‘covered’ with consequential effect on the EEV basis results. As regards the Group’s defined benefit pension schemes, the surplus or deficit attaching to the Prudential Staff Pension Scheme (PSPS) and Scottish Amicable Pension scheme are excluded from the value of UK operations and included in the total for other operations. The surplus and deficit amounts are partially attributable to the Prudential Assurance Company (PAC) with-profits fund and shareholder- backed long-term business and partially to other parts of the Group. In addition to the IFRS surplus or deficit, the shareholders’ 10 per cent share of the PAC with-profits sub-fund’s interest in the movement on the financial position of the schemes is recognised for EEV reporting purposes. The directors are responsible for the preparation of the supplementary information in accordance with the EEV Principles. 2. Methodology (a) Embedded value Overview The embedded value is the present value of the shareholders’ interest in the earnings distributable from assets allocated to covered business after sufficient allowance has been made for the aggregate risks in that business. The shareholders’ interest in the Group’s long- term business comprises: • present value of future shareholder cash flows from in-force covered business (value of in-force business), less a deduction for the cost of locked-in (encumbered) capital; • locked-in (encumbered) capital; and • shareholders’ net worth in excess of encumbered capital. The value of future new business is excluded from the embedded value. P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Notwithstanding the basis of presentation of results (as explained in notes 4 and 6) no smoothing of market or account balance values, unrealised gains or investment returns is applied in determining the embedded value or the profit before tax. Value of in-force business The embedded value results are prepared incorporating best estimate assumptions about all relevant factors including levels of future investment returns, expenses, surrender levels and mortality. These assumptions are used to project future cash flows. The present value of the future cash flows is then calculated using a discount rate which reflects both the time value of money and the non-diversifiable risks associated with the cash flows that are not otherwise allowed for. The total profit that emerges over the lifetime of an individual contract as calculated using the embedded value basis is the same as that calculated under the IFRS basis. Since the embedded value basis reflects discounted future cash flows, under this methodology the profit emergence is advanced thus more closely aligning the timing of the recognition of profits with the efforts and risks of current management actions, particularly with regard to business sold during the year. 256 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements European Embedded Value (EEV) basis supplementary information 2. Methodology continued Cost of capital A charge is deducted from the embedded value for the cost of capital supporting the Group’s long-term business. This capital is referred to as encumbered capital. The cost is the difference between the nominal value of the capital and the discounted value of the projected releases of this capital allowing for investment earnings (net of tax) on the capital. The annual result is affected by the movement in this cost from year to year which comprises a charge against new business profit and generally a release in respect of the reduction in capital requirements for business in force as this runs off. Where capital is held within a with-profits long-term fund, the value placed on surplus assets in this fund is already discounted to reflect their release over time and no further adjustment is necessary in respect of encumbered capital. However, where business is funded directly by shareholders, the capital requires adjustment to reflect the cost of that capital to shareholders. Financial options and guarantees Nature of options and guarantees in Prudential’s long-term business UK insurance operations The only significant financial options and guarantees in the UK insurance operations arise in the with-profits sub-fund and SAIF. With- profits products provide returns to policyholders through bonuses that are smoothed. There are two types of bonuses: annual and final. Annual bonuses are declared once a year and, once credited, are guaranteed in accordance with the terms of the particular product. Unlike annual bonuses, final bonuses are guaranteed only until the next bonus declaration. The with-profits sub-fund held a provision on the Pillar 1 Peak 2 basis of £47 million (2005: £52 million) at 31 December 2006 to honour guarantees on a small amount of guaranteed annuity option products. Beyond the generic features described above, and the provisions held in respect of guaranteed annuities, there are very few explicit options or guarantees of the with-profits sub-fund such as minimum investment returns, surrender values, or annuity values at retirement and any granted have generally been at very low levels. The Group’s main exposure to guaranteed annuity options in the UK is through SAIF and a provision on the Pillar 1 Peak 2 basis of £561 million (2005: £619 million) was held in SAIF at 31 December 2006 to honour the guarantees. Jackson National Life (Jackson) The principal options and guarantees in Jackson are associated with the fixed annuity and variable annuity lines of business. Fixed annuities provide that, at Jackson’s discretion, it may reset the interest rate credited to policyholders’ accounts, subject to a guaranteed minimum. The guaranteed minimum return varies from 1.5 per cent to 5.5 per cent (2005: 1.5 per cent to 5.5 per cent), depending on the particular product, jurisdiction where issued, and date of issue. At 31 December 2006, 70 per cent (2005: 73 per cent) of the fund relates to policies with guarantees of three per cent or less. The average guarantee rate is 3.2 per cent (2005: 3.3 per cent). Fixed annuities also present a risk that policyholders will exercise their option to surrender their contracts in periods of rapidly rising interest rates, possibly requiring Jackson to liquidate assets at an inopportune time. Variable annuity contracts may contain guarantees of certain minimum payments in the event of death, withdrawal or annuitisation. These guarantees may be related to (a) the amount of total deposits made to the contract adjusted for any partial withdrawals, (b) the total deposits made to the contract adjusted for any partial withdrawals, plus a minimum annual return, or (c) the highest contract value on a specified anniversary date adjusted for any withdrawals following the contract anniversary. These guarantees generally protect the policyholder’s value in the event of poor equity market performance. P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I Jackson also issues fixed index annuities that enable policyholders to obtain a portion of an equity-linked return while providing a guaranteed minimum return. The guaranteed minimum returns would be of a similar nature to those described above for fixed annuities. Asian operations Subject to local market circumstances and regulatory requirements, the guarantee features described above in respect of UK business broadly apply to similar types of participating contracts written in the PAC Hong Kong branch, Singapore and Malaysia. Participating products have both guaranteed and non-guaranteed elements. Non-participating long-term products are the only ones where the insurer is contractually obliged to provide guarantees on all benefits. The most significant book of non-participating business in the Group’s Asian operations is Taiwan’s whole of life contracts. For these contracts there are floor levels of policyholder benefits that accrue at rates set at inception by reference to minimum returns established by local regulation. These rates do not vary subsequently with market conditions. Under these contracts the cost of premiums are also fixed at inception based on a number of assumptions at that time, including long-term interest rates, mortality assumptions and expenses. The guaranteed maturity and surrender values reflect the pricing basis. P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 257 Group financial statements European Embedded Value (EEV) basis supplementary information Notes on the EEV basis supplementary information continued 2. Methodology continued Time value The value of financial options and guarantees comprises two parts. One is given by a deterministic valuation on best estimate assumptions (the intrinsic value). The other part arises from the variability of economic outcomes in the future (the time value). Where appropriate, a full stochastic valuation has been undertaken to determine the value of the in-force business including the cost of capital. A deterministic valuation of the in-force business is also derived using consistent assumptions and the time value of the financial options and guarantees is derived as the difference between the two. The economic assumptions used for the stochastic calculations are consistent with those used for the deterministic calculations. Assumptions specific to the stochastic calculations such as equity volatility and credit losses reflect local market conditions and are based on a combination of actual market data, historic market data and an assessment of long-term economic conditions. Common principles have been adopted across the Group for the stochastic asset models, for example, separate modelling of individual asset classes but with an allowance for correlation between the various asset classes. Details of the key characteristics of each model are given in note 3. (b) Level of encumbered capital In adopting the EEV Principles, Prudential has based encumbered capital on its internal targets for economic capital subject to it being at least the local statutory minimum requirements. Economic capital is assessed using internal models, but when applying the EEV Principles Prudential does not take credit for the significant diversification benefits that exist within the Group. For with-profits business written in a segregated life fund, as is the case in the UK and Asia, the capital available in the fund is sufficient to meet the encumbered capital requirements. • UK: the economic capital requirements for annuity business are fully met by Pillar I requirements being four per cent of mathematical reserves, which are also sufficient to meet Pillar II requirements; • US: the level of encumbered capital has been set as 235 per cent of the risk-based capital required by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners at the Company Action Level (CAL), which is sufficient to meet the economic capital requirement; • Asia: the economic capital requirement is substantially higher than local statutory requirements in total. Economic capital requirements vary by territory, but in aggregate, the encumbered capital is equivalent to the amount required under the Financial Conglomerates Directive (FCD). The table below summarises the levels of encumbered capital as a percentage of the relevant statutory requirement: UK insurance operations Jackson Asian operations Capital as a percentage of relevant statutory requirement 100% of EU minimum 235% of CAL 100% of FCD (c) Risk discount rates Overview Under the EEV Principles, discount rates used to determine the present value of future cash flows are set equal to risk-free rates plus a risk margin. The risk margin should reflect any non-diversifiable risk associated with the emergence of distributable earnings that is not allowed for elsewhere in the valuation. Prudential has selected a granular approach to better reflect differences in risk inherent in each product group. The risk discount rate so derived does not reflect a market beta but instead reflects the expected volatility associated with the cash flows in the embedded value model. Since financial options and guarantees are explicitly valued under the EEV methodology, discount rates under EEV are set excluding the effect of these product features. P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V As Prudential’s UK shareholder-backed annuity business is predominantly backed by fixed interest securities, the beta methodology described above is not appropriate. We have therefore used a market consistent embedded value (MCEV) approach to derive an implied risk discount rate which is then applied to the projected cash flows. In the annuity MCEV calculations, the future cash flows were discounted using the gilt yield curve plus 34 basis points (2005: gilt yield curve plus 27 basis points). The 34 basis points was based on our assessment of the liquidity premium available in the yield on the assets backing the annuity liabilities. 258 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements European Embedded Value (EEV) basis supplementary information 2. Methodology continued Allowance for risk The risk allowance in the risk discount rate is determined as follows: Market risk Under the Capital Asset Pricing Methodology (CAPM) the discount rate is determined as: Discount rate = risk-free rate + (beta x equity risk premium) Under CAPM, the beta of a portfolio or product measures its relative market risk. The risk discount rates reflect the market risk inherent in each product group and hence the volatility of product cash flows. They are determined by considering how the profits from each product are affected by changes in expected returns on various asset classes. By converting this into a relative rate of return it is possible to derive a product specific beta. CAPM does not include any allowance for non-market risks since these are assumed to be fully diversifiable. For EEV purposes, however, a risk margin is added for non-diversifiable non-market risks and to cover Group level risks. Product-level betas are calculated each year. They are combined with the most recent product mix to produce appropriate betas and risk discount rates for each major product grouping. Diversifiable non-market risks No allowance is required for non-market risks where these are assumed to be fully diversifiable. The majority of non-market risks are considered to be diversifiable. Non-diversifiable, non-market risks Finance theory cannot be used to determine the appropriate component of beta for non-diversifiable non-market risks since there is no observable risk premium associated with it that is akin to the equity risk premium. Recognising this, a pragmatic approach has been used. A constant margin of 50 basis points (2005: 50 basis points) has been added to the risk margin derived for market risk to cover the non- diversifiable non-market risks associated with the business. For UK shareholder-backed annuity business an additional margin of 100 basis points was used (2005: 100 basis points). (d) Management actions In deriving the time value of financial options and guarantees, management actions in response to emerging investment and fund solvency conditions have been modelled. Management actions encompass, but are not confined to, the following areas: • investment allocation decisions; • levels of reversionary bonuses and credited rates; and • total claim values. Bonus rates are projected from current levels and varied in accordance with assumed management actions applying in the emerging investment and fund solvency conditions. In all instances, the modelled actions are in accordance with approved local practice and therefore reflect the options actually available to management. For the PAC with-profits sub-fund, the actions assumed are consistent with those set out in the Principles and Practices of Financial Management. (e) With-profits business and the treatment of the estate For the PAC with-profits sub-fund, the shareholders’ interest in the estate is derived by increasing terminal bonus rates so as to exhaust the estate over the lifetime of the in-force with-profits business. In those few extreme scenarios where the total assets of the life fund are insufficient to meet policyholder claims in full, the excess cost is fully attributed to shareholders. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 259 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements European Embedded Value (EEV) basis supplementary information Notes on the EEV basis supplementary information continued 2. Methodology continued (f) Pension costs The Group operates three defined benefit schemes in the UK. The principal scheme is the Prudential Staff Pension Scheme (PSPS). The other two, much smaller, schemes are the Scottish Amicable and M&G schemes. There is also a small scheme in Taiwan. Under IFRS the surpluses or deficits attaching to these schemes are accounted for in accordance with the provisions of IAS 19. The surpluses or deficits represent the difference between the market value of the schemes’ assets and the discounted value of projected future benefit payments to retired members and deferred pensioners and, to the extent of service to date, current employed members. For PSPS the surplus or deficit at the reporting date is allocated between the PAC with-profits sub-fund and shareholder-backed operations by reference to the activities of the members of the scheme during their period of service. For the 2005 year end the deficit at that time was allocated in the ratio 70/30. This ratio has continued to be applied to movements in the financial position that relate to opening assets and liabilities at 1 January 2006. However, the service charge and contribution for ongoing service are allocated by reference to the cost allocation for current business. Under the EEV basis the IAS 19 basis surplus or deficit is initially allocated in the same manner. The shareholders’ 10 per cent interest in the PAC with-profits sub-fund estate is determined after inclusion of the portion of the IAS 19 basis surplus or deficit attributable to the fund. Adjustments under EEV in respect of accounting for surpluses or deficits on defined benefit schemes are reflected as part of ‘Other Operations’, as shown in note 15. Separately, the projected cash flows of in-force covered business include contributions to the defined benefit schemes for future service based on the contribution basis applying to the schemes at the time of the preparation of the results. (g) Debt capital Core structural debt liabilities are carried at market value. 3. Assumptions (a) Best estimate assumptions Best estimate assumptions are used for the cash flow projections, where best estimate is defined as the mean of the distribution of future possible outcomes. The assumptions are reviewed actively and changes are made when evidence exists that material changes in future experience are reasonably certain. Assumptions required in the calculation of the value of options and guarantees, for example relating to volatilities and correlations, or dynamic algorithms linking liabilities to assets, have been set equal to the best estimates and, wherever material and practical, reflect any dynamic relationships between the assumptions and the stochastic variables. (b) Principal economic assumptions Deterministic In most countries, the long-term expected rates of return on investments and risk discount rates are set by reference to period end rates of return on cash or fixed interest securities. This ‘active’ basis of assumption setting has been applied in preparing the results of all the Group’s UK and US long-term business operations. For the Group’s Asian operations, the active basis is appropriate for business written in Japan, Korea and US dollar denominated business written in Hong Kong. 260 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements European Embedded Value (EEV) basis supplementary information 3. Assumptions continued An exception to this general rule is that for countries where long-term fixed interest markets are underdeveloped, investment return assumptions and risk discount rates are based on an assessment of longer-term economic conditions. Except for the countries listed above, this basis is appropriate for the Group’s Asian operations. Expected returns on equity and property asset classes are derived by adding a risk premium, also based on the long-term view of Prudential’s economists in respect of each territory, to the risk-free rate. In the UK, the equity risk premium is 4.0 per cent (2005: 4.0 per cent) above risk-free rates. The equity risk premium in the US is also 4.0 per cent (2005: 4.0 per cent). In Asia, equity risk premiums range from 3.0 per cent to 5.8 per cent (2005: 3.0 per cent to 5.75 per cent). Best estimate assumptions for other asset classes, such as corporate bond spreads, are set consistently. Assumed investment returns reflect the expected future returns on the assets held and allocated to the covered business at the valuation date. The table below summarises the principal financial assumptions: UK insurance operations Risk discount rate: New business In force Pre-tax expected long-term nominal rates of investment return: UK equities Overseas equities Property Gilts Corporate bonds Expected long-term rate of inflation Post-tax expected long-term nominal rate of return for the with-profits fund: Pension business (where no tax applies) Life business US operations (Jackson) Risk discount rate: New business In force Expected long-term spread between earned rate and rate credited to policyholders for single premium deferred annuity business US 10-year treasury bond rate at end of period Pre-tax expected long-term nominal rate of return for US equities Expected long-term rate of inflation 31 Dec 2006 % 31 Dec 2005 % 7.8 8.0 8.6 8.6 to 9.3 7.1 4.6 5.3 3.1 7.5 6.6 7.6 6.7 1.75 4.8 8.8 2.5 7.55 7.7 8.1 8.1 to 8.75 6.4 4.1 4.9 2.9 7.1 6.3 6.9 6.1 1.75 4.4 8.4 2.4 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 261 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements European Embedded Value (EEV) basis supplementary information Notes on the EEV basis supplementary information continued 3. Assumptions continued Asian operations Risk discount rate: New business In force Expected long-term rate of inflation Government bond yield Hong Kong (notes iii, iv, v) 31 Dec 2006 % 6.6 6.8 China 31 Dec 2006 % 12.0 12.0 4.0 9.0 2.25 4.7 India 31 Dec 2006 % Indonesia 31 Dec 2006 % Japan 31 Dec 2006 % 16.5 16.5 5.5 10.5 17.5 17.5 6.5 11.5 5.3 5.3 0.0 2.1 Korea 31 Dec 2006 % 9.5 9.5 2.75 5.0 China 31 Dec 2005 % 12.0 12.0 4.0 9.0 Hong Kong (notes iii, iv, v) 31 Dec 2005 % India 31 Dec 2005 % Indonesia 31 Dec 2005 % Japan 31 Dec 2005 % 5.9 6.15 2.25 4.8 16.5 16.5 5.5 10.5 17.5 17.5 6.5 11.5 5.0 5.0 0.0 1.8 Korea 31 Dec 2005 % 10.3 10.3 2.75 5.8 Malaysia Singapore Taiwan (notes iv, v) Philippines (notes iv, v) (notes ii, v) 31 Dec 2006 % 31 Dec 2006 % 31 Dec 2006 % 31 Dec 2006 % Thailand 31 Dec 2006 % Malaysia Vietnam (notes iv, v) 31 Dec 2005 % 31 Dec 2006 % Philippines 31 Dec 2005 % Singapore (notes iv, v) 31 Dec 2005 % Taiwan (notes ii, v) 31 Dec 2005 % Thailand 31 Dec 2005 % Vietnam 31 Dec 2005 % Risk discount rate: New business In force Expected long-term rate of inflation Government bond yield 9.5 9.2 3.0 7.0 16.5 16.5 5.5 10.5 6.9 6.9 8.8 13.75 9.3 13.75 1.75 4.5 2.25 5.5 3.75 7.75 Weighted risk discount rate (note i): New business In force Asia total 31 Dec 2006 % 9.8 8.8 16.5 16.5 5.5 10.5 Asia total 31 Dec 2005 % 9.8 8.4 9.4 9.0 3.0 7.0 16.5 16.5 5.5 10.5 6.7 6.8 1.75 4.5 9.0 9.4 13.75 13.75 2.25 5.5 3.75 7.75 16.5 16.5 5.5 10.5 Notes (i) The weighted discount rates for the Asian operations shown above have been determined by weighting each country’s discount rates by reference to the EEV basis operating result for new business and the closing value of in-force business. (ii) For traditional business in Taiwan, the economic scenarios used to calculate the 2006 and 2005 EEV basis results reflect the assumption of a phased progression of the bond yields from the current rates applying to the assets held to the long-term expected rates. The projections assume that in the average scenario, the current bond yields of around 2 per cent trend towards 5.5 per cent at 31 December 2013 (2005: 2 per cent trend towards 5.5 per cent at 31 December 2012). In projecting forward the Fund Earned Rate, allowance is made for the mix of assets in the fund, future investment strategy, and further market value depreciation of bonds held as a result of assumed future yield increases. These factors, together with the assumption of the phased progression in bond yields, give rise to an average assumed Fund Earned Rate that trends from 2.1 per cent for 2006 to 5.7 per cent for 2014. The assumed Fund Earned Rate falls to 1.4 per cent in 2007 and remains below 2.1 per cent for a further five years. This feature is due to the depreciation of bond values as yields rise. Thereafter, the assumed Fund Earned Rate fluctuates around a target of 5.9 per cent. This projection compares with that applied for the 2005 results of a grading from an assumed rate of 2.3 per cent for 2005 to 5.4 per cent for 2013. Consistent with the EEV methodology applied, a constant discount rate has been applied to the projected cash flows. (iii) The assumptions shown are for US dollar denominated business which comprises the larger proportion of the in-force Hong Kong business. (iv) Assumed equity yields The most significant equity holdings in the Asian operations are in Hong Kong, Singapore and Malaysia. The mean equity return assumptions for those territories at 31 December 2006 were 8.7 per cent (31 December 2005: 8.6 per cent), 9.3 per cent (31 December 2005: 9.3 per cent) and 12.8 per cent (31 December 2005: 12.8 per cent) respectively. To obtain the mean, an average over all simulations of the accumulated return at the end of the projection period is calculated. The annual average return is then calculated by taking the root of the average accumulated return minus 1. (v) For Singapore, Malaysia, Taiwan and Hong Kong, cash rates are used in setting the risk discount rates. 262 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements European Embedded Value (EEV) basis supplementary information 3. Assumptions continued Stochastic The economic assumptions used for the stochastic calculations are consistent with those used for the deterministic calculations described above. Assumptions specific to the stochastic calculations such as the volatilities of asset returns reflect local market conditions and are based on a combination of actual market data, historic market data and an assessment of longer-term economic conditions. Common principles have been adopted across the Group for the stochastic asset models, for example, separate modelling of individual asset classes but with allowance for correlation between the various asset classes. Details are given below of the key characteristics and calibrations of each model. UK insurance operations • Interest rates are projected using a two-factor model calibrated to actual market data; • the risk premium on equity assets is assumed to follow a log-normal distribution; • the corporate bond return is calculated as the return on a zero-coupon bond plus a spread. The spread process is a mean reverting stochastic process; and • property returns are modelled in a similar fashion to corporate bonds, namely as the return on a riskless bond, plus a risk premium, plus a process representative of the change in residual values and the change in value of the call option on rents. The rates to which the model has been calibrated are set out below: Mean returns have been derived as the annualised arithmetic average return across all simulations and durations. Standard deviations have been calculated by taking the annualised variance of the returns over all the simulations, taking the square root and averaging over all durations in the projection. For bonds the standard deviations relate to the yields on bonds of the average portfolio duration. For equity and property, they relate to the total return on these assets. The standard deviations applied are as follows: Government bond yield Corporate bond yield Equities: UK Overseas Property Standard deviation 2006 2.0 5.5 18.0 16.0 15.0 2005 2.0 5.5 18.0 16.0 15.0 Jackson • Interest rates are projected using a log-normal generator calibrated to actual market data; • corporate bond returns are based on Treasury securities plus a spread that has been calibrated to current market conditions and varies by credit quality; and • variable annuity equity and bond returns have been stochastically generated using a regime-switching log-normal model with parameters determined by reference to historical data. The volatility of equity fund returns ranges from 18.6 per cent to 28.1 per cent (2005: 18.6 per cent to 28.1 per cent), depending on risk class, and the volatility of bond funds ranges from 1.4 per cent to 2.0 per cent (2005: 1.4 per cent to 1.8 per cent). Asian operations The same asset return models, as used in the UK, appropriately calibrated, has been used for the Asian operations. The principal asset classes are government and corporate bonds. Equity holdings are much lower than in the UK whilst property is not held as an investment asset. The stochastic cost of guarantees is only of significance for the Hong Kong, Singapore, Malaysia and Taiwan operations. The mean stochastic returns are consistent with the mean deterministic returns for each country. The volatility of equity returns ranges from 18 per cent to 25 per cent (2005: 18 per cent to 26 per cent) and the volatility of government bond yields ranges from 1.4 per cent to 2.5 per cent (2005: 1.3 per cent to 2.2 per cent). Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 263 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements European Embedded Value (EEV) basis supplementary information Notes on the EEV basis supplementary information continued 3. Assumptions continued (c) Demographic assumptions Persistency, mortality and morbidity assumptions are based on an analysis of recent experience but also reflect expected future experience. Where relevant, when calculating the time value of financial options and guarantees, policyholder withdrawal rates vary in line with the emerging investment conditions according to management’s expectations. (d) Expense assumptions Expense levels, including those of service companies that support the Group’s long-term business operations, are based on internal expense analysis investigations and are appropriately allocated to acquisition of new business and renewal of in-force business. Exceptional expenses are identified and reported separately. Asia development and Regional Head Office expenses are charged to EEV basis results as incurred. No adjustment is made to the embedded value of covered business as the amounts of expenditure that relate to operating expenses are not material. Similarly, corporate expenditure for Group Head Office, to the extent not allocated to the PAC with-profits sub-fund, is charged to the EEV basis result as incurred. (e) Inter-company arrangements The EEV results for covered business incorporate the effect of the reinsurance arrangement of non-profit immediate pension annuity liabilities of SAIF to Prudential Retirement Income Limited, as described in note 5(a). In addition, the analysis of free surplus and value of in-force business takes account of the impact of contingent loan arrangements between Group companies. (f) Taxation and other legislation Current taxation and other legislation has been assumed to continue unaltered except where changes have been announced and the relevant legislation passed. (g) Fund management and service companies The value of future profits or losses from fund management and service companies that support the Group’s covered businesses are included in the profits for new business and the in-force value of the Group’s long-term business. 4. Accounting presentation (a) Analysis of profit before tax To the extent applicable, presentation of the EEV profit for the year is consistent with the basis the Group applies for analysis of IFRS basis profits before shareholder taxes between operating and non-operating results. Operating results reflect the underlying results of the Group’s continuing operations including longer-term investment returns. Operating results include the impact of routine changes of estimates and non-economic assumptions. Non-operating results include certain recurrent and exceptional items that primarily do not reflect the performance in the year of the Group’s continuing operations. (b) Investment return Profit before tax With the exception of debt securities held by Jackson, investment gains and losses during the year (to the extent that changes in capital values do not directly match changes in liabilities) are included directly in the profit for the year and shareholders’ funds as they arise. In the case of Jackson, market value movements on debt securities are initially recorded as movements in shareholder reserves, reflecting the available-for-sale (AFS) categorisation under IFRS. Similarly, the value movements on derivatives are recorded in the income statement. However, it is assumed that fixed income investments backing liabilities will normally be held until maturity. Therefore, unrealised gains and losses on these securities are not reflected in either the EEV or statutory basis results and, except on realisation or impairment of investments, only income received and the amortisation of the difference between cost and maturity values are recognised to the extent attributable to shareholders. This is consistent with the basis of valuation of future cash flows of in-force business, which inter alia, reflects spread basis earnings which are not directly affected by short-term value movements in fixed income securities. Similar principles apply to value movements on Jackson’s derivatives that are fair valued for IFRS reporting with value movements booked in the IFRS income statement. From 31 December 2006, fixed income securities backing the free surplus and required capital are accounted for at fair value. However, consistent with the AFS treatment applied for IFRS, movements in unrealised appreciation are accounted for in equity rather than in the income statement. Investment returns reflect those earned on a market basis over the period without smoothing, but after appropriate adjustments for movements in the additional shareholders’ interest recognised on the EEV basis. Operating profit Investment returns, including investment gains, in respect of long-term insurance business are recognised in operating results at the expected long-term rate of return. For the purposes of calculating the longer-term investment return to be included in the operating results of UK operations, where equity holdings are a significant proportion of investment portfolios, values of assets at the beginning of the reporting period are adjusted to remove the effects of short-term market volatility. 264 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements European Embedded Value (EEV) basis supplementary information 4. Accounting presentation continued For the purposes of determining the long-term returns for debt securities of shareholder-backed operations, a risk margin charge is included which reflects the expected long-term rate of default based on the credit quality of the portfolio. Interest-related realised gains and losses are amortised to the operating results over the maturity period of the sold bonds. For equity-related investments of Jackson, a long-term rate of return is assumed, which reflects the aggregation of risk-free rates and equity risk premium. (c) Pension costs Profit before tax Movements on the shareholders’ share of surplus or deficit of the Group’s defined benefit pension schemes adjusted for contributions paid in the year are recorded within the income statement. Consistent with the basis of distribution of bonuses and the treatment of the estate described in notes 2d) and 2e), the shareholders’ share incorporates 10 per cent of the proportion of the surplus or deficit attributable to the PAC with-profits sub-fund. The surplus or deficit is determined by applying the requirements of IAS 19. Actuarial gains and losses Actuarial gains and losses comprise: • the difference between actual and expected return on the scheme assets; • experience gains and losses on scheme liabilities; and • the impact of altered economic and other assumptions on the discounted value of scheme liabilities. These items are recorded in the income statement but, consistent with the IFRS basis of presentation, are excluded from operating results. (d) Effect of changes in economic assumptions and time value of cost of options and guarantees Movements in the value of in-force business caused by changes in economic assumptions and the time value of cost of options and guarantees resulting from changes in economic factors are recorded in non-operating results. (e) Results for fund management operations The results of the Group’s fund management operations include the profits from management of internal and external funds. For EEV basis reporting, Group shareholders’ other income is adjusted to deduct the expected margin for the year on management of covered business. The deduction is on a basis consistent with that used for projecting the results for covered business. Group operating profit accordingly includes the variance between actual and expected profit in respect of covered business. (f) Capital held centrally for Asian operations In adopting the EEV Principles Prudential has decided to set encumbered capital at its internal targets for economic capital. In Asia, the economic capital target is substantially higher than the local statutory requirements in total. Accordingly, capital is held centrally for Asian operations. For the purposes of the presentation of the Group’s operating results, it is assumed that the centrally held capital is lent interest free to the Asian operations. In turn, the results of the Asian operations include the return on that capital and Group shareholders’ other income for EEV basis reporting is consequently reduced. (g) Taxation The EEV profit for the year for covered business is calculated initially at the post-tax level. The post-tax profit is then grossed up for presentation purposes at the effective rate of tax. In general, the effective rate corresponds to the corporation tax rate on shareholder profits of the business concerned. (h) Foreign currency translation Foreign currency profit and losses have been translated at average exchange rates for the year. Foreign currency assets and liabilities have been translated at year end rates of exchange. The purpose of translating the profit and losses at average exchange rates, notwithstanding the fact that EEV profit represents the incremental value added on a discounted cash flow basis, is to maintain consistency with the methodology applied for IFRS basis reporting. P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I The principal exchange rates applied are: Local currency: £ Hong Kong Japan Malaysia Singapore Taiwan US Closing rate at 31 Dec 2006 Average Closing rate at for 2006 31 Dec 2005 Average Opening rate at 1 Jan 2005 for 2005 15.22 233.20 6.90 3.00 63.77 1.96 14.32 214.34 6.76 2.93 59.95 1.84 13.31 202.63 6.49 2.85 56.38 1.72 14.15 200.13 6.89 3.03 58.47 1.82 14.92 196.73 7.30 3.13 60.84 1.92 P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 265 Group financial statements European Embedded Value (EEV) basis supplementary information Notes on the EEV basis supplementary information continued 5. Premiums, operating profit and margins from new business (a) Premiums and contributions UK insurance operations Direct to customer Individual annuities Individual pensions and life Department of Work and Pensions rebate business Total Business to business Corporate pensions Individual annuities Bulk annuities Total Intermediated distribution Life Individual annuities Individual and corporate pensions Total Partnerships Life Individual and bulk annuities: Bulk annuity reinsurance from the Scottish Amicable Insurance Fund* Individual and other bulk annuities Total Europe Life P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I US operations Fixed annuities Fixed index annuities Variable annuities Life Guaranteed Investment Contracts GIC – Medium Term Notes Total US operations P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Asian operations China Hong Kong India (Group’s 26% interest) Indonesia Japan Korea Malaysia Singapore Taiwan Other Total Asian operations Group total 266 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Single Regular Annual premium and contribution equivalents Present value of new business premiums 2006 £m 2005 £m 2006 £m 2005 £m 2006 £m 2005 £m 2006 £m 2005 £m 816 60 161 1,037 536 264 85 885 961 919 130 2,010 720 29 244 993 242 212 511 965 1,112 995 108 2,215 840 814 560 1,500 2,900 – 1,814 2,628 159 201 – 9 – 9 162 – – 162 5 – 22 27 3 – – 3 – – 11 – 11 146 – – 146 6 – 25 31 3 – – 3 – 688 554 3,819 8 458 437 5,964 27 355 20 31 68 103 4 357 92 15 1,072 788 616 2,605 11 355 634 5,009 17 289 4 42 30 29 9 284 124 9 837 – – – 17 – – 17 36 103 105 71 7 208 72 72 139 36 849 14,027 12,848 1,067 – – – 14 – – 14 23 83 57 42 4 132 66 58 150 33 648 853 82 15 16 72 14 24 816 99 161 720 70 244 113 110 1,076 1,034 216 26 8 250 101 92 35 228 170 21 51 242 118 100 36 254 1,071 264 85 1,420 995 919 228 2,142 772 212 511 1,495 1,149 995 195 2,339 87 84 855 835 56 150 293 16 900 69 55 382 18 46 44 614 39 139 107 74 14 218 72 108 148 37 956 – 182 266 20 892 79 62 261 15 35 63 515 25 112 57 46 7 135 67 86 162 34 731 560 1,500 2,915 – 1,814 2,649 159 201 7,712 7,718 688 554 3,819 147 458 437 6,103 198 933 411 269 97 1,130 418 803 743 130 5,132 788 616 2,605 137 355 634 5,135 144 741 215 186 50 578 383 704 912 126 4,039 2,470 2,138 18,947 16,892 Total UK insurance operations 6,991 7,002 201 191 Group financial statements European Embedded Value (EEV) basis supplementary information 5. Premiums, operating profit and margins from new business continued *The tables shown above are provided as an indicative volume measure of transactions undertaken in the reporting period that have the potential to generate profits for shareholders. The amounts shown are not, and not intended to be, reflective of premium income recorded in the IFRS income statement. Annual premium and contribution equivalents are calculated as the aggregate of regular new business amounts and one-tenth of single new business amounts. The tables above include a bulk annuity transaction with the Scottish Amicable Insurance Fund (SAIF) with a premium of £560 million. The transaction reflects the arrangement entered into in June 2006 for the reinsurance of non-profit immediate pension annuity liabilities of SAIF to Prudential Retirement Income Limited (PRIL), a shareholder-owned subsidiary of the Group. SAIF is a closed ring-fenced sub- fund of the PAC long-term fund established by a Court approved Scheme of Arrangement in October 1997, which is solely for the benefit of SAIF policyholders. Shareholders have no interest in the profits of this fund, although they are entitled to investment management fees on this business. Accordingly, it is not part of covered business for EEV reporting purposes. The inclusion of the transaction betweeen SAIF and PRIL as new business, reflects the transfer from SAIF to Prudential shareholders’ funds of longevity risk, the requirement to set aside supporting capital and the entitlement to surpluses arising on this block of business arising from the reinsurance arrangement. Consistent with the transfer from uncovered to covered business and reflecting the transfers above, the transaction has been accounted for as new business for EEV basis reporting purposes. New business premiums reflect those premiums attaching to covered business, including premiums for contracts classified as investment products for IFRS basis reporting. New business premiums for regular premium products are shown on an annualised basis. Department of Work and Pensions rebate business is classified as single recurrent business. Internal vesting business is classified as new business where the contracts include an open market option. For previous periods the new business for intermediated distribution of UK insurance operations have included Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) rebate business for SAIF. These are excluded from the table above with comparatives restated accordingly. The amounts of new SAIF DWP rebate business written was £60 million in 2006 and £83 million in 2005. (b) Profit UK insurance operations Jackson (note i) Asian operations Total (i) Jackson net of tax profit Before capital charge Capital charge After capital charge Pre-tax £m 266 259 514 1,039 2006 2005 Pre-tax £m 243 211 413 867 Tax £m Post-tax £m (80) (91) (141) (312) 186 168 373 727 182 (14) 168 Tax £m Post-tax £m (73) (74) (124) (271) 170 137 289 596 150 (13) 137 In determining the EEV basis value of new business written in the year the policies incept, premiums are included in projected cash flows on the same basis of distinguishing annual and single premium business as set out for statutory basis reporting. Included within pre-tax new business profits shown in the table above are profits arising from fund management business falling within the scope of covered business of: P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I UK insurance operations Jackson Asian operations 2006 £m 9 2 23 34 2005 £m 7 2 10 19 P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 267 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements European Embedded Value (EEV) basis supplementary information Notes on the EEV basis supplementary information continued 5. Premiums, operating profit and margins from new business continued (c) Margins 2006 UK insurance operations Jackson Asian operations Total 2005 UK insurance operations Jackson Asian operations Total Asian operations: Hong Kong Korea Taiwan India China Other Total Asian operations New business premiums Single £m Regular £m Annual premium and contribution equivalent (APE) £m 6,991 5,964 1,072 201 17 849 900 614 956 Present value of new business premiums (PVNBP) £m 7,712 6,103 5,132 14,027 1,067 2,470 18,947 1,039 Pre-tax new business contribution £m New business margin (APE) % (PVNBP) % 266 259 514 30 42 54 42 3.4 4.2 10.0 5.5 New business premiums Single £m 7,002 5,009 837 12,848 Regular £m 191 14 648 853 Annual premium and contribution equivalent (APE) £m 892 515 731 Present value of new business premiums (PVNBP) £m 7,718 5,135 4,039 2,138 16,892 Pre-tax new business contribution £m New business margin (APE) % (PVNBP) % 243 211 413 867 27 41 56 41 3.1 4.1 10.2 5.1 New business margin (APE) 2006 % 2005 % 69 35 55 23 43 72 54 60 37 51 29 51 76 56 New business margins are shown on two bases, namely the margins by reference to the Annual Premium Equivalents (APE) and the Present Value of New Business Premiums (PVNBP). APEs are calculated as the aggregate of regular new business amounts and one-tenth of single new business amounts. PVNBPs are calculated as single premiums plus the present value of expected premiums of new regular premium business, allowing for lapses and other assumptions made in determining the EEV new business contribution. The table of new business premiums and margins above excludes SAIF DWP rebate premiums. In determining the EEV basis value of new business written in the year the policies incept, premiums are included in projected cash flows on the same basis of distinguishing annual and single premium business as set out for statutory basis reporting. New business contributions represent profits determined by applying the economic and non-economic assumptions applying at the end of the year. 268 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements European Embedded Value (EEV) basis supplementary information 6. Operating profit from business in force UK insurance operations Unwind of discount and other expected returns (note i) Cost of strengthened persistency assumption (note ii) Mortality related cost of capital charge (note iii) Other items (notes iv and vi) Jackson Unwind of discount and other expected returns: (note i) On value of in-force and required capital On surplus assets Spread experience variance Amortisation of interest-related realised gains and losses Profit on repricing Term contracts (Loss) profit from changes to other operating assumptions Other (vii) Asian operations Unwind of discount and other expected returns (note i) Change in operating assumptions (viii (a)) Experience variances and other items (viii (b)) Total 2006 £m 2005 £m 530 – – (110) 420 202 49 118 45 – (7) 42 449 254 45 16 315 1,184 424 (148) (47) (46) 183 160 52 89 53 140 10 26 530 162 (9) 10 163 876 Notes (i) For UK insurance and Asian operations, unwind of discount and other expected returns is determined by reference to the value of in-force business, required capital and surplus assets at the start of the year as adjusted for the effect of changes in economic and operating assumptions reflected in the current year. For the unwind of discount for UK insurance operations included in operating results based on longer-term returns a further adjustment is made. For UK insurance operations the amount represents the unwind of discount on the value of in-force business at the beginning of the year (adjusted for the effect of current year assumption changes), the expected return on smoothed surplus assets retained within the PAC with-profits sub-fund and the expected return on shareholders’ assets held in other UK long-term business operations. Surplus assets retained within the PAC with-profits sub-fund are smoothed for this purpose to remove the effects of short-term investment volatility from operating results. In the balance sheet and for total profit reporting, asset values and investment returns are not smoothed. For Jackson the return on surplus assets is shown separately. (ii) The £148 million cost of strengthened persistency assumption for 2005 applies to a number of products, primarily in respect of with-profits bonds. (iii) The £47 million charge for 2005 primarily relates to the cost of capital attaching to liability strengthening on the regulatory basis for annuity business. (iv) UK insurance operations other items represent: Cost associated with regulatory requirements including Sarbanes-Oxley, and product and distribution development Adjustments to the policyholder and shareholder taxes for non-participating business of the PAC long-term fund, after grossing up for notional tax Other items (note (v)) 2006 £m (32) (26) (52) (110) 2005 £m (45) 0 (1) (46) (v) Included within other items of £(52) million (2005: £(1) million) is a charge of £14 million (2005: £12 million) in respect of annual licence fee payments and a charge of £16 million (2005: £16 million) for expense over-runs in respect of a tariff agreement with SAIF. The licence fee payments are made by shareholder-backed subsidiaries of UK insurance operations, via a service company, to the PAC with-profits sub-fund for the right to use trademarks and for the goodwill associated with the purchase of the business of the Scottish Amicable Life Assurance Society in 1997. The licence fee arrangements run to 2017. The charge in respect of SAIF, which is not covered business, is borne by a service company and arises from a tariff arrangement which is currently onerous to shareholders. The tariff arrangement will be replaced at the end of 2007. Charges in respect of these items are reflected in the EEV and IFRS results on an annual basis. The charge for 2006 for other items also includes a negative persistency experience variance of £9 million. (vi) Expense assumptions The 2005 EEV basis financial statements included note disclosure explaining that in determining the appropriate expense assumptions for 2005 account had been taken of the cost synergies that were expected to arise with some certainty from the initiative announced in December 2005 from UK insurance operations working more closely with Egg and M&G. Without this factor there would have been a charge for altered expense assumptions of approximately £55 million. The half year 2006 EEV basis results were prepared on the same basis. The initiative was expected to provide annual savings to the cost base of UK operations in aggregate of £40 million. In addition, at the interim results stage, it was announced that an end to end review of the UK business, with the aim of reducing the overall cost base was underway. Total UK annual savings, including the £40 million mentioned above, were noted as being expected to be £150 million per annum comprising £100 million for Egg and shareholder-backed business of UK insurance operations and £50 million attaching to the with-profits sub-fund. The savings for the UK insurance operations cover both acquisition and renewal activity. Reflecting the underlying trend in unit costs, the interim results announcement noted that the element of the additional savings of £110 million that relate to long-term business was expected to be neutral in its effect on EEV basis results. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 269 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements European Embedded Value (EEV) basis supplementary information Notes on the EEV basis supplementary information continued 6. Operating profit from business in force continued Notes continued With the agreement to sell Egg Banking plc the actions necessary to implement these plans have been reassessed and additional initiatives put in place, as announced on 15 March 2007. In preparing the 2006 EEV basis results for UK insurance operations, account has been taken of the expense savings that are expected to arise from these initiatives. Without this factor the effect on the 2006 results would have been an additional charge of £44 million for the net effect of revised assumptions in line with 2006 unit costs. The size of this change reflects the lagged effect of the implementation of the previously announced initiatives which have affected run-rate savings as at 31 December 2006 but not translated to the same extent in unit costs over 2006 as a whole. (vii) Jackson The principal component of the £42 million credit in 2006 for other profit is £31 million of favourable mortality experience variance. (viii) Asian operations (a) Changes in operating assumptions The £45 million profit from changes in operating assumptions for Asian operations includes £24 million in respect of higher assumed investment management margins based on current experience, a further £24 million for the net effect of altered lapse rates across a number of territories and similarly a net £20 million for changes to mortality and morbidity assumptions offset by a charge of £23 million for other items. (b) Experience variances and other items Experience variances and other items of £16 million for 2006 comprise £35 million for favourable mortality variance and £18 million in respect of the investment return on capital held centrally in respect of Taiwan, offset by negative expense variances of £26 million in respect of China (£14 million) and India (£12 million) and £11 million of other charges. The negative expense variances are primarily a reflection of the expenses for new business being in excess of the target levels factored into the valuation of new business for these operations which are at a relatively early stage of development. On the basis of current plans, the target level for India is planned to be attained in 2009. In the case of China, the target level for existing operations is planned to be attained in 2011. 7. Investment return and other income IFRS basis Less: allocation of investment return on centrally held capital in respect of Taiwan business to operating result of Asian operations Less: projected fund management result in respect of covered business incorporated in opening EEV value of in-force business EEV basis 8. UK restructuring costs UK restructuring costs have been incurred as follows: UK insurance operations M&G Egg Unallocated corporate 2006 £m 58 (18) (32) 8 2005 £m 87 (21) (24) 42 2006 £m 34 2 12 5 53 The charge of £53 million comprises £50 million recognised on the IFRS basis and an additional £3 million recognised on the EEV basis for the shareholders’ share of costs incurred by the PAC with-profits sub-fund. The costs relate to the initiative announced in December 2005 for UK insurance operations to work more closely with Egg and M&G. 270 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements European Embedded Value (EEV) basis supplementary information 9. Short-term fluctuations in investment returns Long-term business: UK insurance operations (note i) Jackson (note ii) Asian operations (note iii) Share of investment return of funds managed by PPM America that are consolidated into Group results but attributable to external investors Share of profits of venture investment companies and property partnerships of the PAC with-profits sub-fund that are consolidated into Group results but are attributable to external investors Other operations Total 2006 £m 378 63 286 1 0 17 2005 £m 994 67 41 0 1 (35) 745 1,068 Notes (i) Short-term fluctuations in investment returns for UK insurance operations represent the difference between total investment returns in the year attributable to shareholders on the EEV basis and the longer-term return included within operating profit as described on schedule 4. The £378 million (2005: £994 million) reflects the PAC life fund investment return earned in the year of 12 per cent (2005: 20 per cent). (ii) Short-term fluctuations for Jackson comprise: Actual investment return on investments less long-term returns included within operating profit: Actual realised gains less default assumption and amortisation of interest-related realised gains and losses for fixed maturity securities and related swap transactions Actual less long-term return on equity-based investments and other items Investment return related gain due primarily to changed expectation of profits on in-force variable annuity business in future periods based on current period equity returns*, net of related hedging activity 2006 £m 2005 £m 20 26 17 63 5 58 4 67 *This adjustment arises due to market returns being higher than the assumed long-term rate of return. This gives rise to higher than expected year end values of variable annuity assets under management with a resulting effect on the projected value of future account values, and hence future profitability. (iii) Short-term fluctuations for Asian operations of £286 million in 2006 were due to strong market performance in most territories, in particular in Vietnam (£108 million) relating to increases in both bond and equity portfolios and in Hong Kong (£73 million) where an increase in the investment return on the equity portfolio more than offset the reductions in bond prices. Short-term fluctuations in Taiwan were £46 million and £41 million in Singapore. 10. Mark to market value movements on core borrowings Jackson Other operations 2006 £m 3 82 85 2005 £m (2) (65) (67) Core borrowings of the Group are marked to market value under EEV. As the liabilities are generally held to maturity or for the long term, no deferred tax asset has been established on the increase (compared to IFRS) in carrying value. Accordingly, no deferred tax charge (credit) is recorded in the results against the 2006 credit of £85 million (2005: charge of £67 million). P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I 11. Actuarial and other gains and losses on defined benefit pension schemes The gain of £207 million (2005: charge £47 million) included in total profit reflects the shareholders’ share of actuarial and other gains and losses on the Group’s defined benefit pension schemes. On the EEV basis, this gain (charge) includes a 10 per cent share of the actuarial gains and losses on the share attributable to the PAC with-profits sub-fund for the Prudential Staff and Scottish Amicable Pension Schemes. The very high level of shareholders’ actuarial gains in 2006 reflects the excess of market returns over the long-term assumption and the increase in discount rate applied in determining the present value of projected pension payment from 4.8 per cent at 31 December 2005 to 5.2 per cent at 31 December 2006. The 2005 full year charge of £47 million included a charge of £43 million for altered renewal expense assumptions arising from the prospective increase in employer contributions for the Prudential Staff Pension Scheme for future service of active members (as distinct from deficit funding). P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 271 Group financial statements European Embedded Value (EEV) basis supplementary information Notes on the EEV basis supplementary information continued 12. Effect of changes in economic assumptions and time value of cost of options and guarantees The profits (losses) on changes in economic assumptions and time value of cost of options and guarantees resulting from changes in economic factors for in-force business included within the profit from continuing operations before tax (including actual investment returns) arise as follows: 2006 2005 UK insurance operations (note i) Jackson (note ii) Asian operations (note iii) Total Change in economic assumptions £m Change in time value of cost of options and guarantees £m 182 (51) (132) (1) 40 6 14 60 Change in economic assumptions £m Change in time value of cost of options and guarantees £m (81) (3) (265) (349) 31 11 5 47 Total £m 222 (45) (118) 59 Total £m (50) 8 (260) (302) Notes (i) The effect of changes in economic assumptions for UK insurance operations reflects primarily movements in gilt rates of return which affect assumed rates of return and discount rates, as described in note 3. (ii) The charge of £51 million for Jackson in 2006 arises from the change in risk discount rate, partially offset by the positive effect of increased assumed future rate of return for separate account variable annuity business. Both changes reflect the 0.4 per cent increase in the 10 year treasury bond rate. (iii) The £132 million charge for 2006 for Asian operations for the effects of changes in economic assumptions mainly relates to Taiwan where there is a charge of £101 million arising from the delay in the assumed long-term yield projection, as described in note 3(ii) and the associated effect of this delay on the economic capital requirement. The principal cause of the Asia charges in 2005 of £265 million was for the reduction in short-term earned rates in Taiwan in 2005. This reduction had the effect of delaying the emergence of the expected long-term rate, and the associated effect of this delay on the economic capital requirement. 13. Taxation charge The tax charge comprises: Tax on operating profit from continuing operations Long-term business (note i): UK insurance operations (note ii and iii) Jackson (note iv) Asian operations (note ii) Other operations Total tax charge on operating profit from continuing operations Tax on items not included in operating profit Tax charge on short-term fluctuations in investment returns Tax charge (credit) on actuarial and other gains and losses on defined benefit pension schemes Tax credit on effect of changes in economic assumptions and time value of cost of options and guarantees (note v) Total tax charge on items not included in operating profit from continuing operations Tax charge on profit on ordinary activities from continuing operations (including tax on actual investment returns) 2006 £m 2005 £m 178 251 222 651 (64) 587 214 62 (4) 272 127 204 162 493 (130) 363 343 (14) (39) 290 859 653 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Notes (i) The profit for the year for covered business is in most cases calculated initially at the post-tax level. The post-tax profit for covered business is then grossed up for presentation purposes at the effective rates of tax applicable to the countries and periods concerned. In the UK, this is the UK corporation tax rate of 30 per cent. For Jackson, the US federal rate of 35 per cent is applied to gross up movements on the value of in-force business. Effects on statutory tax for the period affect the overall tax rate. For Asia, similar principles apply subject to the availability of taxable profits. (ii) Including tax relief on UK restructuring costs borne by UK insurance operations and Asia development expenses. (iii) The tax charge for UK insurance operations of £178 million includes a credit of £19 million in respect of a prior year tax adjustment for shareholder-backed business. (iv) The tax charge for Jackson of £251 million includes a charge in respect of prior years of £29 million and a charge of £26 million in respect of a change in valuation of deferred tax under EEV to reflect discounting over a period of four to 11 years depending upon the type of business concerned. These adjustments also have resulted in a reallocation from free surplus to the value of in-force business of £44 million. (v) The tax credit for 2006 on the effect of changes in economic assumptions includes a credit of £9 million in respect of a change in the tax rate for Malaysia. 272 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements European Embedded Value (EEV) basis supplementary information 14. Earnings per share (EPS) Operating EPS from continuing operations: Operating profit before tax Tax Minority interests Operating profit after tax and minority interests from continuing operations Operating EPS from continuing operations Total EPS from continuing operations: Total profit before tax Tax Minority interests Total profit after tax and minority interests from continuing operations Total EPS from continuing operations Average number of shares (millions) 2006 £m 2005 £m 1,976 (587) 1 1,390 57.6p 3,072 (859) (1) 2,212 91.7p 1,712 (363) (10) 1,339 56.6p 2,244 (653) (12) 1,579 66.8p 2,413 2,365 The average number of shares reflects the average number in issue adjusted for shares held by employee trusts and consolidated unit trusts and OEICs which are treated as cancelled. 15. Shareholders’ funds – segmental analysis UK operations Long-term business operations (notes i and ii): Smoothed shareholders’ funds (note iii) Actual shareholders’ funds less smoothed shareholders’ funds EEV basis shareholders’ funds M&G (note vii): Net assets of operations Acquired goodwill (note v) Egg (note vii) US operations Jackson (net of surplus note borrowings of £158m (2005: £183m) note vi): Shareholders’ funds before capital charge Capital charge (note iv) EEV basis shareholders’ funds Broker-dealer, fund management and Curian operations (note vii) Asian operations Long-term business (note i): Net assets of operations – EEV basis shareholders’ funds Acquired goodwill (note v) Fund management (note vii): Net assets of operations Acquired goodwill (note v) Other operations Holding company net borrowings (note vi) Other net liabilities (note vii) Total P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I 2006 £m 2005 £m 5,155 658 5,813 230 1,153 292 7,488 4,558 574 5,132 245 1,153 303 6,833 3,420 (117) 3,303 57 3,360 3,465 (117) 3,348 70 3,418 2,548 111 1,988 111 89 61 82 61 2,809 2,242 P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V (1,542) (232) (1,724) (468) (1,774) (2,192) 11,883 10,301 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 273 Group financial statements European Embedded Value (EEV) basis supplementary information Notes on the EEV basis supplementary information continued 15. Shareholders’ funds – segmental analysis continued Notes (i) A charge is deducted from the annual result and embedded value for the cost of capital supporting the Group’s long-term business operations. This capital is referred to as encumbered capital. The cost is the difference between the nominal value of the capital and the discounted value of the projected releases of this capital allowing for investment earnings (net of tax) on the capital. Where encumbered capital is held within a with-profits sub-fund, the value placed on surplus assets in the fund is already discounted to reflect its release over time and no further adjustment is necessary in respect of encumbered capital. (ii) The proportion of surplus allocated to shareholders from the UK with-profits business has been based on the present level of 10 per cent. Future bonus rates have been set at levels which would fully utilise the assets of the with-profits fund over the lifetime of the business in force. (iii) UK long-term business smoothed shareholders’ funds reflect an adjustment to the assets of the PAC with-profits sub-fund, for the purposes of determining the unwind of discount included in operating profits, to remove the short-term volatility in market values of assets. Shareholders’ funds in the balance sheet are determined on an unsmoothed basis. (iv) In determining the cost of capital of Jackson, it has been assumed that an amount equal to 235 per cent of the risk-based capital required by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) at the Company Action Level must be retained. The impact of the related capital charge is to reduce Jackson’s shareholders’ funds by £117 million (2005: £117 million). (v) Under IFRS, subject to impairment testing, goodwill is no longer amortised. Acquired goodwill of the Japanese life business was subject to an impairment charge of £120 million which was included in the 2005 results. P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C Goodwill attaching to venture fund investment subsidiaries of the PAC with-profits fund that are consolidated under IFRS are not included in the table above as the goodwill attaching to these companies is not relevant to the analysis of shareholders’ funds. (vi) Net core structural borrowings of shareholder-financed operations comprise: Holding company cash and short-term investments Core structural borrowings – central funds* Holding company net borrowings Core structural borrowings – Jackson 2006 £m 1,119 (2,661) (1,542) (158) (1,700) 2005 £m 1,128 (2,852) (1,724) (183) (1,907) *The altered carrying value of core structural borrowings under EEV compared to those under IFRS reflects the application of market values rather than cost. (vii) With the exception of the share of pension scheme surpluses (deficits) attributable to the PAC with-profits sub-fund which are included in other operations’ net liabilities, and the borrowings as described in note vi, the amounts shown for the items in the table above that are referenced to this note have been determined on the statutory IFRS basis. The pension scheme surplus (deficit) net of tax attributable to shareholders relating to the Prudential Staff Pension and Scottish Amicable Pension Schemes are determined as shown below: IFRS basis (re shareholder-backed operations) Additional amounts recognised under EEV (re shareholders’ 10% share of the surplus (deficit) attributable to the PAC with-profits sub-fund) EEV basis 2006 £m 19 6 25 2005 £m (113) (29) (142) D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V 274 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Total operating profit (loss) based on longer-term investment returns 652 378 Short-term fluctuations in investment returns (note 9) Mark to market value movements on core borrowings (note 10) Actuarial gains and losses on defined benefit pension schemes (note 11) Effect of changes in economic assumptions and time value of (34) 708 63 3 815 286 (34) 2,175 727 3 222 (45) (118) 59 Group financial statements European Embedded Value (EEV) basis supplementary information 16. Reconciliation of movement in shareholders’ funds Operating profit (including investment return based on long-term rates of returns) Long-term business: New business (note 5) Business in force (note 6) Asia development expenses M&G Egg Asian fund management operations US broker-dealer and fund management Curian Other income and expenditure UK restructuring costs (note 8) cost of options and guarantees (note 12) Profit on ordinary activities before tax (including actual investment returns) Tax on profits (losses) from continuing operations (note 13): Tax on operating profit Tax on short-term fluctuations in investment returns Tax on actuarial and other gains and losses on defined benefit pension schemes Tax on effect of changes in economic assumptions and time value of cost of options and guarantees Total tax (charge) credit Minority interests Profit for the financial year Unrealised valuation movements on Egg securities classified as available-for-sale Movement in cash flow hedges Exchange movements (note i) Related tax Intra group dividends (including statutory transfer) External dividends Reserve movements in respect of share-based payments Investment in operations (note ii) Other transfers (note iv) Movement in own shares in respect of share-based payment plans Movement on Prudential plc shares purchased by unit trusts consolidated under IFRS Acquisition of Egg minority interests Issues of share capital by parent company Cumulative adjustment at 31 December 2006, net of related tax, for Jackson assets backing surplus and required capital (note vi) Long-term business operations UK insurance operations £m Jackson £m Asian operations £m Total long-term business operations £m Other operations £m Group total £m 266 420 686 259 449 708 514 315 829 (14) 1,039 1,184 2,223 (14) 1,039 1,184 2,223 (15) 204 (145) 50 18 (8) (298) (53) 1,976 745 85 207 59 (1) 204 (145) 50 18 (8) (298) (19) (199) 18 82 207 1,252 729 983 2,964 108 3,072 (178) (113) (251) (21) (222) (75) (651) (209) 64 (5) (587) (214) (67) 16 55 4 (358) (256) (242) (856) (62) (62) 4 (859) (1) (3) (1) 894 473 741 2,108 104 2,212 (432) (169) (601) (271) (113) (90) (474) 127 (69) 10 10 95 (17) 232 (76) 7 7 (2) 7 242 (74) 474 (399) 15 (232) 76 6 0 (167) 336 (2) 7 (359) (74) (399) 15 6 0 (167) 336 7 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Net increase (decrease) in shareholders’ capital and reserves Shareholders’ capital and reserves at 1 January 2006 681 5,132 (45) 3,348 560 1,988 1,196 10,468 386 1,582 (167) 10,301 Shareholders’ capital and reserves at 31 December 2006 (notes (iii) and 15) 5,813 3,303 2,548 11,664 219 11,883 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 275 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements European Embedded Value (EEV) basis supplementary information Notes on the EEV basis supplementary information continued 16. Reconciliation of movement in shareholders’ funds continued Notes (i) Profits are translated at average exchange rates, consistent with the method applied for statutory IFRS basis results. The amounts recorded above for exchange rate movements reflect the difference between 2005 and 2006 exchange rates as applied to shareholders’ funds at 1 January 2006 and the difference between 31 December 2006 and average 2006 rates for profits. (ii) Investment in operations reflects increases in share capital. This includes certain non-cash items as a result of timing differences. (iii) For the purposes of the table above, goodwill related to Asia long-term operations (as shown in note 15) is included in ‘Other operations’. (iv) Other transfers (from) to long-term business operations to other operations represents: Adjustments for net of tax fund management projected profit of covered business Adjustment for investment return, net of related tax, on economic capital for Taiwan operations held centrally Other adjustments (note v) UK insurance operations £m (15) (54) (69) Jackson £m Asian operations £m (2) 12 10 (5) (13) 1 (17) Total long-term business operations £m (22) (13) (41) (76) (v) The other adjustment for UK insurance operations is merely technical in nature and is a reallocation of shareholders’ funds from net worth to central funds to more closely align the corporate and business unit structure for EEV reporting purposes. The Jackson other adjustment of £12 million is mainly for a tax related benefit arising from the US basis of filing. (vi) Previously the valuation placed on the assets backing Jackson’s surplus and required capital reflected the fact that generally they are held for the longer-term and excluded the short-term differences between market value and amortised cost. For the balance sheet at 31 December 2006 and prospectively these short-term value adjustments are now incorporated. At 31 December 2006, the balance sheet adjustment, net of related tax is an increase of £7 million. For 31 December 2005, the adjustment, if it had been booked at that date, was an increase of £19 million. Future movements for this item, consistent with the basis applied under IFRS for available-for-sale securities, will be booked in the statement of movement in shareholders’ capital and reserves. Long-term business operations UK insurance operations £m Jackson £m Asian operations £m Total long-term business operations £m Other operations £m Group total £m 1,263 4,550 5,813 2,656 647 3,303 1,176 1,372 5,095 6,569 393 (174) 5,488 6,395 2,548 11,664 219 11,883 147 831 910 1,073 (42) 962 1,015 2,866 5,129 (254) (40) 1,578 (117) (141) 2,156 (521) (7) 8,863 (892) (188) 5,813 3,303 2,548 11,664 Long-term business operations UK insurance operations £m 1,141 3,991 5,132 148 710 4,529 (192) (63) 5,132 Jackson £m 2,899 449 3,348 899 1,198 1,511 (117) (143) 3,348 Asian operations £m 1,034 954 1,988 Total long-term business operations £m Other operations £m Group total £m 5,074 5,394 120 (287) 5,194 5,107 10,468 (167) 10,301 (212) 974 835 2,882 1,771 (539) (6) 7,811 (848) (212) 1,988 10,468 EEV basis shareholders’ funds at 31 December 2006 Analysed as: Statutory IFRS basis shareholders’ funds Additional retained profit on an EEV basis EEV basis shareholders’ funds at 31 December 2006 Comprising: Free surplus Required capital Value of in-force business before deduction of cost of capital and of guarantees Cost of capital Cost of time value of guarantees EEV basis shareholders’ funds at 1 January 2006 Analysed as: Statutory IFRS basis shareholders’ funds Additional retained profit on an EEV basis EEV basis shareholders’ funds at 1 January 2006 Comprising: Free surplus Required capital Value of in-force business before deduction of cost of capital and of guarantees Cost of capital Cost of time value of guarantees 276 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements European Embedded Value (EEV) basis supplementary information 17. Reconciliation of net worth and value of in-force business Reconciliation of net worth and value of in-force business for 2006 (note i) Shareholders’ capital and reserves at 1 January 2006 (note vii) New business contribution (notes ii, iii) Expected return on existing business Existing business – transfer to net worth (note v) Changes of operating assumptions and experience variances (note viii) Changes of non-operating assumptions and experience variances and minority interests Profit after tax from continuing operations Exchange rate movements Intra group dividends (including statutory transfer) and investment in operations Cumulative adjustment at 31 December 2006, net of related tax, for Jackson assets backing surplus and required capital Other transfers from net worth (note ix) Required capital £m 2,882 383 91 (290) 20 48 252 (268) – Total net worth (note iv) £m 3,717 (171) 132 653 (9) 92 697 (337) (127) Value of in-force business (note vi) £m 6,751 898 641 (653) 31 494 1,411 (264) (115) Total long-term business £m 10,468 727 773 0 22 586 2,108 (601) (242) – – 7 (76) – – 7 (76) Free surplus £m 835 (554) 41 943 (29) 44 445 (69) (127) 7 (76) Shareholders’ capital and reserves at 31 December 2006 (note vii) 1,015 2,866 3,881 7,783 11,664 Notes (i) All figures are shown net of tax. (ii) The movements arising from new business contribution are as follows: Free surplus Required capital Total net worth Value of in-force Total long-term business (iii) The new business contribution arises as follows: UK insurance operations Jackson Asian operations (iv) Net worth consists of statutory solvency capital (or economic capital where higher) and unencumbered capital. (v) Existing business transfer to net worth UK insurance operations Jackson Asian operations 2006 (note iii) £m (554) 383 (171) 898 727 Value of in-force business (note ii) £m 231 200 467 898 Value of in-force business (note ii) £m (369) (116) (168) (653) Free surplus £m (221) (228) (105) (554) Free surplus £m 408 326 209 943 Required capital £m 176 196 11 383 Required capital £m (39) (210) (41) (290) Total net worth (note i) £m (45) (32) (94) (171) Total net worth (note i) £m 369 116 168 653 (vi) Value of in-force business includes the value of future margins from current in-force business less the cost of holding encumbered capital. (vii) Included in the EEV basis shareholders’ funds of long-term business operations of £11,664 million (2005: £10,468 million) is £257 million (2005: £174 million) in respect of fund management business falling within the scope of covered business as follows: UK insurance operations Jackson Asian operations 2006 £m 125 12 120 257 (viii) Included within the change of operating assumptions and experience variances is a reallocation from free surplus to the value of in-force business of £44 million in respect of the Jackson tax adjustments as detailed in note 13(iv). In addition, for other long-term operations, a reallocation from free surplus of £58 million to required capital of £26 million and the value of in-force business of £32 million has been made in respect of non-recurring adjustments. (ix) Other transfers from net worth Adjustment for net of tax fund management projected profits of covered business Adjustment for investment return net of related tax on economic capital for Taiwan operations held centrally Other adjustments 2006 £m (22) (13) (41) (76) Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 277 2005 £m (562) 409 (153) 749 596 Total long-term business £m 186 168 373 727 Total long-term business £m 0 0 0 0 2005 £m 120 12 42 174 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements European Embedded Value (EEV) basis supplementary information Notes on the EEV basis supplementary information continued 18. Sensitivity of results to alternative assumptions (a) Sensitivity analysis – economic assumptions The tables below show the sensitivity of the embedded value as at 31 December 2006 (2005) and the new business contribution after the effect of encumbered capital for 2006 and 2005 to: • one per cent increase in the discount rates; • one per cent increase and decrease in interest rates, including all consequential changes (assumed investment returns for all asset classes, market values of fixed interest assets, risk discount rates); • one per cent rise in equity and property yields; • ten per cent fall in market value of equity and property assets (not applicable for new business contribution); and • holding company statutory minimum capital (by contrast to economic capital). In each sensitivity calculation, all other assumptions remain unchanged except where they are directly affected by the revised economic conditions. P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C UK insurance operations £m Jackson £m Asian operations £m Total long-term £m 266 259 514 1,039 (46) 4 (11) 16 (28) 3 (17) 28 (56) (9) 7 23 (130) (2) (21) 67 5,813 3,303 2,548 11,664 (480) 55 (70) 382 (502) 8 (127) (190) 116 46 (58) 82 (271) 42 (115) 154 (99) 391 (878) (93) (69) 582 (659) 481 2006 D New business profit for 2006 As reported (note 5) Discount rates – 1% increase Interest rates – 1% increase Interest rates – 1% decrease Equity/property yields – 1% rise Embedded value of long-term operations at 31 December 2006 As reported (note 16) Discount rates – 1% increase Interest rates – 1% increase (notes i, ii) Interest rates – 1% decrease (notes i, ii) Equity/property yields – 1% rise Equity/property market values – 10% fall Statutory minimum capital E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V 278 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements European Embedded Value (EEV) basis supplementary information 18. Sensitivity of results to alternative assumptions continued 2005 New business profit for 2005 As reported (note 5) Discount rates – 1% increase Interest rates – 1% increase Interest rates – 1% decrease Equity/property yields – 1% rise Embedded value of long-term operations at 31 December 2005 As reported (note 16) Discount rates – 1% increase Interest rates – 1% increase (notes i, iii) Interest rates – 1% decrease (notes i, iii) Equity/property yields – 1% rise Equity/property market values – 10% fall (note iii) Statutory minimum capital Notes (i) Asian operations 2006 Asian operations Established markets Taiwan* Korea Vietnam Other UK insurance operations £m Jackson £m Asian operations £m Total long-term £m 243 (49) (4) (5) 13 211 (27) 2 (26) 24 413 (46) (6) 3 20 867 (122) (8) (28) 57 5,132 3,348 1,988 10,468 (432) 69 (99) 297 (480) 0 (133) (144) 55 42 (55) 79 (236) 49 (126) 136 (75) 431 (801) (26) (170) 475 (610) 510 Embedded value of long-term operations £m 2,039 (216) 191 198 336 2,548 Interest rates % of embedded value 1% increase £m 1% decrease £m 1% increase % 1% decrease % (55) 107 (5) (1) (4) 42 45 (165) 5 1 (1) (115) (3) 50 (3) (1) (1) 2 2 (76) 3 1 0 (5) *Taiwan sensitivity to starting bond rates (i.e. the starting bond rate for the progression to the assumed long-term rate): Taiwan Embedded value at 31 Dec 2006 £m 1% increase in the starting bond rates £m 1% decrease in the starting bond rates £m (216) 116 (125) For Taiwan: (a) If a delay of a further year to 31 December 2014 for the start and end of the progression period had been assumed in preparing the 2006 results, there would have been an additional charge of £(88) million. P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H 2005 Asian operations Established markets Taiwan* Korea Vietnam Other Embedded value of long-term operations £m 1,844 (311) 136 127 192 1,988 *Taiwan sensitivity to starting bond rates (i.e. the starting bond rate for the progression to the assumed long-term rate): Taiwan Interest rates % of embedded value 1% increase £m 1% decrease £m 1% increase % 1% decrease % I (57) 106 (3) 3 0 49 49 (174) 3 (2) (2) (126) (3) 34 (2) 2 0 2 3 (56) 2 (2) (1) (6) Embedded value at 31 Dec 2005 £m 1% increase in the starting bond rates £m 1% decrease in the starting bond rates £m (311) 104 (108) P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V (ii) Jackson sensitivities for 2006 to one per cent movements in interest rates include the effect on net worth as detailed in note 16 (vi). (iii) 2005 comparatives have been adjusted to reflect refinements to the methodology in UK insurance operations, for the effect of interest rate movements, and in Jackson, for the effect of equity falls where the impact of associated hedging activity on variable annuity business is now included. Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 279 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Group financial statements European Embedded Value (EEV) basis supplementary information Notes on the EEV basis supplementary information continued 18. Sensitivity of results to alternative assumptions continued (b) Sensitivity analysis – non-economic assumptions The tables below show the sensitivity of the embedded value as at 31 December 2006 (2005) and the new business contribution after the effect of required capital for 2006 and 2005 to: • ten per cent proportionate decrease in maintenance expenses (a 10 per cent sensitivity on a base expense assumption of £10 per annum would represent an expense assumption of £9 per annum); • ten per cent proportionate decrease in lapse rates (a 10 per cent sensitivity on a base assumption of five per cent would represent a lapse rate of 4.5 per cent per annum); and • five per cent proportionate decrease in base mortality and morbidity rates (i.e. increased longevity). UK insurance operations £m Jackson £m Asian operations £m Total long-term £m 266 10 8 (27) 1 (28) 259 514 1,039 6 21 6 6 0 13 42 14 14 0 29 71 (7) 21 (28) 5,813 3,303 2,548 11,664 33 75 (87) 7 (94) 32 110 75 75 0 45 93 77 77 0 110 278 65 159 (94) UK insurance operations £m Jackson £m Asian operations £m Total long-term £m 243 8 7 (39) 1 (40) 211 413 5 18 5 5 0 10 39 13 13 0 867 23 64 (21) 19 (40) 5,132 3,348 1,988 10,468 33 68 (62) 9 (71) 36 90 90 90 0 45 87 69 69 0 114 245 97 168 (71) 2006 New business profit for 2006 As reported (note 5) Maintenance expenses – 10% decrease Lapse rates – 10% decrease Mortality and morbidity – 5% decrease Change representing effect on: Life business Annuity business Embedded value of long-term operations for 2006 As reported (note 16) Maintenance expenses – 10% decrease Lapse rates – 10% decrease Mortality and morbidity – 5% decrease Change representing effect on: Life business Annuity business 2005 New business profit for 2005 As reported (note 5) Maintenance expenses – 10% decrease Lapse rates – 10% decrease Mortality and morbidity – 5% decrease Change representing effect on: Life business Annuity business Embedded value of long-term operations for 2005 As reported (note 16) Maintenance expenses – 10% decrease Lapse rates – 10% decrease Mortality and morbidity – 5% decrease Change representing effect on: Life business Annuity business 280 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Group financial statements European Embedded Value (EEV) basis supplementary information Statement of directors’ responsibilities in respect of the European Embedded Value (EEV) basis supplementary information The directors have chosen to prepare supplementary information in accordance with the EEV Principles issued in May 2004 by the CFO Forum of European Insurance Companies and expanded by the Additional Guidance on European Embedded Value Disclosures issued in October 2005. When compliance with the EEV Principles is stated, those principles require the directors to prepare supplementary information in accordance with the Embedded Value Methodology (EVM) contained in the EEV Principles and to disclose and explain any non- compliance with the EEV guidance included in the EEV Principles. In preparing the EEV supplementary information, the directors have: • prepared the supplementary information in accordance with the EEV Principles; • identified and described the business covered by the EVM; • applied the EVM consistently to the covered business; • determined assumptions on a realistic basis, having regard to past, current and expected future experience and to any relevant external data, and then applied them consistently; • made estimates that are reasonable and consistent; and • described the basis on which business that is not covered business has been included in the supplementary information, including any material departures from the accounting framework applicable to the Group’s financial statements. Independent auditor’s report to Prudential plc on the European Embedded Value (EEV) basis supplementary information We have audited the EEV basis supplementary information (the supplementary information) on pages 252 to 280 in respect of the year ended 31 December 2006. The supplementary information has been prepared in accordance with the EEV Principles issued in May 2004 by the CFO Forum as supplemented by the Additional Guidance on European Embedded Value Disclosures issued in October 2005 (together ‘the EEV Principles’) using the methodology and assumptions set out on pages 256 to 264. The EEV supplementary information should be read in conjunction with the Group’s financial statements which are on pages 99 to 249. This report is made solely to the Company in accordance with the terms of our engagement. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the Company those matters we have been engaged to state in this report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the Company for our audit work, for this report, or for the opinions we have formed. Respective responsibilities of directors and auditor As described in the statement of directors’ responsibilities on this page, the directors’ responsibilities include preparing the supplementary information on the EEV basis in accordance with the EEV Principles. Our responsibilities, as independent auditor, in relation to the supplementary information are established in the UK by the Auditing Practices Board, by our profession’s ethical guidance and the terms of our engagement. Under the terms of engagement we are required to report to the Company our opinion as to whether the supplementary information has been properly prepared in accordance with the EEV Principles using the methodology and assumptions set out on pages 256 to 264. We also report if we have not received all the information and explanations we require for this audit. Basis of audit opinion We conducted our audit having regard to International Standards on Auditing (UK and Ireland) issued by the Auditing Practices Board. An audit includes examination, on a test basis, of evidence relevant to the amounts and disclosures in the supplementary information. It also includes an assessment of the significant estimates and judgements made by the directors in the preparation of the supplementary information, and of whether the accounting policies applied in the preparation of the supplementary information are appropriate to the Group’s circumstances, consistently applied and adequately disclosed. We planned and performed our audit so as to obtain all the information and explanations which we considered necessary in order to provide us with sufficient evidence to give reasonable assurance that the supplementary information is free from material misstatement, whether caused by fraud or other irregularity or error. In forming our opinion, we also evaluated the overall adequacy of the presentation of the supplementary information. Opinion In our opinion, the EEV basis supplementary information for the year ended 31 December 2006 has been properly prepared in accordance with the EEV Principles using the methodology and assumptions set out on pages 256 to 264. KPMG Audit Plc Chartered Accountants London 14 March 2007 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 281 P r i m a r y s t a t e m e n t s A B C D E F G H I P a r e n t c o m p a n y E E V Additional information Shareholder information Shareholder information Analysis of registered shareholder accounts 31 December 2006 Size of shareholding Over 10,000,000 1,000,001 – 10,000,000 1,000,000 – 500,001 500,000 – 100,001 100,000 – 10,001 10,000 – 5,001 5,000 – 1,001 1,000 – 1 Total Number of shareholder accounts % of total number of shareholder accounts 43 302 159 562 2,638 3,634 23,511 49,032 79,881 0.06 0.38 0.20 0.70 3.30 4.55 29.43 61.38 100 Number of shares 1,146,115,227 893,517,664 112,240,399 132,304,239 67,576,527 25,366,369 52,361,471 14,830,529 2,444,312,425 % of total number of shares 46.89 36.56 4.59 5.41 2.76 1.04 2.14 0.61 100 Financial calendar Annual General Meeting Payment of 2006 final dividend Announcement of 2007 interim results Ex dividend date Record date 17 May 2007 22 May 2007 1 August 2007 15 August 2007 17 August 2007 Payment of 2007 interim dividend 24 September 2007 Shareholder enquiries Lloyds TSB Registrars The Causeway Worthing West Sussex BN99 6DA Tel: 0870 600 0190 Fax: 0870 600 3980 Textel: 0870 600 3950 (for hard of hearing) Dividend mandates Shareholders may find it convenient to have their dividends paid directly to their bank or building society account. If you wish to take advantage of this facility, please call Lloyds TSB Registrars on 0870 600 0190 and request a dividend mandate form. Alternatively, you may download a form from the Company website www.prudential.co.uk/prudential-plc/investors/ shareholder_services/ Evergreen scrip dividend scheme The Company will be offering an evergreen scrip dividend scheme in respect of the final dividend for the year ending 31 December 2006. The number of new shares each participating shareholder will be entitled to, is calculated by dividing the total cash dividend due at the record date (13 April 2007) by the scrip reference price. The scrip reference price is calculated as the average of the middle market quotations for the Company’s shares as derived from the Daily Official List of the London Stock Exchange for the five business days which commenced on 11 April 2007. Once signed up to the evergreen scrip, shareholders will automatically receive shares for all future scrip dividends. This election can be cancelled at any time by the shareholder. Further details of the scrip dividend scheme was mailed to shareholders on 30 March 2007, and is also available on the Company website www.prudential.co.uk/prudential-plc/investors/ The evergreen scrip is subject to shareholders’ approval, at the 2007 Annual General Meeting, of a resolution authorising directors to offer scrip dividend to shareholders until the 2012 Annual General Meeting (at which time such authorisation will need to be renewed) and a resolution amending the Articles of Association of the Company to accommodate the ‘evergreen’ nature of the evergreen scrip. Annual report – future mailings Under the new Companies Act 2006 provisions, the Company is notifying shareholders this year that they will no longer receive hard copies of the Annual Report, but will instead receive a notification by email/post that the Annual Report is available on the Company website www.prudential.co.uk/prudential-plc/investors/ The Company advises shareholders to register with Shareview (details below) in order to receive email notifications, therefore maximising the environmental benefits of this process. Shareholders can elect to receive hard copies of the Annual Report by completing the card attached to the Form of Proxy or by contacting Lloyds TSB Registrars on 0870 600 0190. 282 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Additional information Shareholder information Electronic communications Shareholders are encouraged to elect to receive shareholder documents electronically by registering with Shareview at www.shareview.co.uk This will save on printing and distribution costs, and create environmental benefits. When you register, you will be sent an email notification to advise when shareholder documents are available on our website and you will be provided with a link to that information. When registering, you will need your shareholder reference number which can be found on your share certificate or Form of Proxy. Please contact Lloyds TSB Registrars if you require any assistance or further information. Share dealing services The Company’s Registrars, Lloyds TSB Registrars, offer a postal dealing facility for buying and selling Prudential plc ordinary shares, telephone 0870 242 4244. They also offer a telephone and internet dealing service, Shareview, which provides a simple and convenient way of selling Prudential plc shares. For telephone sales call 0870 850 0852 between 8.30am and 4.30pm, Monday to Friday, and for internet sales log on to www.shareview.co.uk/dealing ShareGift Shareholders who only have a small number of shares whose value makes it uneconomic to sell them may wish to consider donating them to ShareGift (Registered Charity 1052686). The relevant share transfer form may be obtained from Lloyds TSB Registrars or from the Company website www.prudential.co.uk/ prudential-plc/investors/shareholder_services/ Further information about ShareGift may be obtained on 020 7337 0501 or from www.ShareGift.org There are no implications for capital gains tax purposes (no gain or loss) on gifts of shares to charity and it is also possible to obtain income tax relief. Irish branch register The Company operates a branch register for Irish shareholders. All enquiries regarding Irish branch register accounts should be directed to Capita Corporate Registrars Plc, Unit 5, Manor Street Business Park, Manor Street, Dublin 7. Telephone: 00 353 1 810 2400. American Depositary Receipts (ADRs) The Company’s ordinary shares are listed on the New York Stock Exchange in the form of American Depositary Shares, evidenced by ADRs and traded under the symbol PUK. Each American Depositary Share represents two ordinary shares. All enquiries regarding ADR holder accounts should be directed to JP Morgan, the authorised depositary bank, at JP Morgan Service Center, PO Box 3408, South Hackensack, NJ 07606-3408, USA. Telephone: 001 201 680 6630 or log on to www.adr.com Form 20-F The Company is subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in the USA as such requirements apply to foreign companies and files its Form 20-F with the SEC. Copies of Form 20-F can be found on the Company’s website at www.prudential.co.uk or on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 283 Additional information How to contact us How to contact us Prudential plc Laurence Pountney Hill London EC4R 0HH Tel: +44 (0)20 7220 7588 www.prudential.co.uk Sir David Clementi Chairman Mark Tucker Group Chief Executive Philip Broadley Group Finance Director Rebecca Burrows Group Communications Director Peter Maynard Group Legal Services Director & Company Secretary Priscilla Vacassin Group Human Resources Director Prudential UK & Europe 3 Sheldon Square London W2 6PR Tel: +44 (0)20 7334 9000 www.pru.co.uk Nick Prettejohn Chief Executive M&G Laurence Pountney Hill London EC4R 0HH Tel: +44 (0)20 7626 4588 www.mandg.co.uk Michael McLintock Chief Executive Prudential Corporation Asia 13th Floor One International Finance Centre 1 Harbour View Street Central Hong Kong Tel: +852 2918 6300 Fax: +852 2525 7522 www.prudentialcorporation-asia.com Barry Stowe Chief Executive Jackson National Life Insurance Company 1 Corporate Way Lansing Michigan 48951 United States Tel: +1 517 381 5500 www.jnl.com Clark Manning President & Chief Executive Officer Institutional Analyst and Investor Enquiries Tel: +44 (0)20 7548 3511 E-mail: investor.relations@prudential.co.uk Private Shareholder Enquiries Tel: +44 0870 600 0190 International shareholders’ tel: + 44 (0) 121 415 7047 Media Enquiries Tel: +44 (0)20 7548 2007 E-mail: media.relations@prudential.co.uk 284 Prudential plc Annual Report 2006 Prudential public limited company Incorporated and registered in England and Wales Registered office Laurence Pountney Hill London EC4R 0HH Registered number: 1397169 Prudential plc is a holding company, some of whose subsidiaries are authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority (FSA) Forward-Looking Statement This report may contain certain ‘forward-looking statements’ with respect to certain of Prudential's plans and its current goals and expectations relating to its future financial condition, performance, results, strategy and objectives. Statements containing the words ‘believes’, ‘intends’, ‘expects’, ‘plans’, ‘seeks’ and ‘anticipates’, and words of similar meaning, are forward-looking. By their nature, all forward-looking statements involve risk and uncertainty because they relate to future events and circumstances which are beyond Prudential's control including among other things, UK domestic and global economic and business conditions, market related risks such as fluctuations in interest rates and exchange rates, and the performance of financial markets generally; the policies and actions of regulatory authorities, the impact of competition, inflation, and deflation; experience in particular with regard to mortality and morbidity trends, lapse rates and policy renewal rates; the timing, impact and other uncertainties of future acquisitions or combinations within relevant industries; and the impact of changes in capital, solvency or accounting standards, and tax and other legislation and regulations in the jurisdictions in which Prudential and its affiliates operate. This may for example result in changes to assumptions used for determining results of operations or re-estimations of reserves for future policy benefits. As a result, Prudential's actual future financial condition, performance and results may differ materially from the plans, goals, and expectations set forth in Prudential's forward-looking statements. Prudential undertakes no obligation to update the forward-looking statements contained in this report or any other forward-looking statements it may make. This report is printed on Revive 50:50. This paper is produced from 50 per cent recovered waste and 50 per cent virgin fibre, and the pulp is bleached using an Elemental Chlorine Free (ECF) process. The Forest Stewardship Council have given this paper their Mixed Sources accreditation, acknowledging it has been produced from recycled wood or fibre, well-managed forests and other controlled sources. The paper mill and printer are certified to the ISO 14001 environmental management standard. This report can be recycled. Designed and produced by CGI London. Printed by royle corporate print. Prudential public limited company Incorporated and registered in England and Wales Registered office Laurence Pountney Hill London EC4R 0HH Registered number: 1397169 Prudential plc is a holding company, some of whose subsidiaries are authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority (FSA) www.prudential.co.uk