Quarterlytics / Consumer Cyclical / Restaurants / Rave Restaurant Group, Inc.

Rave Restaurant Group, Inc.

rave · NASDAQ Consumer Cyclical
Claim this profile
Ticker rave
Exchange NASDAQ
Sector Consumer Cyclical
Industry Restaurants
Employees 11-50
← All annual reports
FY2015 Annual Report · Rave Restaurant Group, Inc.
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
RAVE Restaurant Group, Inc. 
2015 Annual Report 

  1 

 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION    
WASHINGTON, D. C.  20549 

FORM 10-K 

(Mark One) 
[X] 

[    ] 

Annual  Report  pursuant  to  Section  13  or  15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934  
For the fiscal year ended June 28, 2015. 
Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934  
For the transition period from _____ to _____. 

Commission File Number 0-12919 

RAVE RESTAURANT GROUP, INC. 

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) 

Missouri         
(State or jurisdiction of   
incorporation or organization) 

3551 Plano Parkway 
The Colony, Texas  
(Address of principal executive offices) 

45-3189287 
(I.R.S. Employer 
Identification No.) 

75056 
(Zip Code) 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:  (469) 384-5000 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: 

Title of class 

Common stock, par value $.01 each 

Name of each exchange on which registered 
NASDAQ Capital Market 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: 

None 

Indicate  by  check  mark  if  the  registrant  is  a  well-known  seasoned  issuer,  as  defined  in  Rule  405  of  the 

Securities Act.  Yes     No   

Indicate  by  check  mark  if  the  registrant  is  not  required  to  file  reports  pursuant  to  Section  13  or  Section 

15(d) of the Act.  Yes       No   

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the 
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. 
Yes   No ___ 

Indicate  by  check  mark  whether  the  registrant  has  submitted  electronically  and  posted  on  its  corporate 
Website, if  any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation 
S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for  such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post 
such files).  Yes__  No__ 

              Indicate  by  check  mark  if  disclosure  of  delinquent  filers  pursuant  to  Item  405  of  Regulation  S-K  is  not 

  2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information 
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [] 

Indicate  by  check  mark  whether  the  registrant  is  a  large  accelerated  filer,  an  accelerated  filer,  a  non-
accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company.  See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and 
“smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.   

Large accelerated filer         Accelerated filer       Non-accelerated filer        Smaller reporting company   

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).  

Yes ___     No   

As of December 28, 2014, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal 
quarter,  the  aggregate  market  value  of  the  voting  and  non-voting  common  equity  held  by  non-affiliates  was 
approximately $44.7 million computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold on the 
NASDAQ Capital Market. 

 As of September 24, 2015, there were 10,313,635 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding. 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE 

Portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement, to be filed pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities 
Exchange Act in connection with the registrant’s annual meeting of shareholders scheduled for November 17, 2015, 
have been incorporated by reference in Part III of this report. 

  3 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
          
 
Forward-Looking Statements  

This Form 10-K contains certain forward-looking statements, within the meaning of the Private Securities 
Litigation  Reform  Act  of  1995,  which  are  intended  to  be  covered  by  the  safe  harbors  created  thereby.    Forward-
looking statements include statements which are predictive in nature, which depend upon or refer to future events or 
conditions, or which include words such as “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “estimate” or similar 
expressions.    These  statements  include  the  plans  and  objectives  of  management  for  future  operations,  including 
plans and objectives relating to future  growth of our business activities and availability  of funds.  Statements  that 
address business and growth strategies, performance goals, projected financial condition and operating results, our 
understanding of our competition, industry and market trends, and any other statements or assumptions that are not 
historical facts are forward-looking statements. 

The forward-looking statements included in this Form 10-K are based on current expectations that 
involve numerous risks and uncertainties.  Assumptions relating to these forward-looking statements involve 
judgments  with  respect  to,  among  other  things,  future  economic,  competitive  and  market  conditions, 
regulatory  framework  and  future  business  decisions,  all  of  which  are  difficult  or  impossible  to  predict 
accurately and many of which are beyond our control.  Although we believe that the assumptions underlying 
these forward-looking statements are reasonable, any of the assumptions could be inaccurate and, therefore, 
there can be no assurance that the forward-looking statements included in this Form 10-K will prove to be 
accurate.  In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in these forward-looking statements, the inclusion 
of such information should not be regarded as a representation that our objectives and plans will be achieved. 

PART I 

ITEM 1.  BUSINESS. 

General 

Rave Restaurant Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively referred to as the “Company” or in the first 
person  notations  of  “we”,  “us”  and  “our”)  operate  and  franchise  pizza  buffet,  delivery/carry-out  and  express 
restaurants domestically and internationally under the trademark “Pizza Inn” and operate and franchise domestic fast 
casual  restaurants  under  the  trademarks  “Pie  Five  Pizza  Company”  or  “Pie  Five”.    We  provide  or  facilitate  the 
procurement  and  distribution  of  food,  equipment  and  supplies  to  our  domestic  and  international  system  of 
restaurants through our Norco Restaurant Services Company (“Norco”) division and through agreements with third 
party distributors.   

As of June 28, 2015, we owned and operated 26 restaurants comprised of 24 Pie Five restaurants (“Pie Five 
Units”) and two Pizza Inn buffet restaurants (“Buffet Units”).  As of that date, we also had 30 franchised Pie Five 
Units and 248 franchised Pizza Inn restaurants.  The 177 domestic franchised Pizza Inn restaurants were comprised 
of 99 Buffet Units, 21 delivery/carry-out restaurants (“Delco Units”) and 57 express restaurants (“Express Units”).  
The 71 international franchised Pizza Inn restaurants were comprised of 18 Buffet Units, 45 Delco Units and eight 
Express  Units.    Domestic  restaurants  were  located  predominantly  in  the  southern  half  of  the  United  States,  with 
Texas,  North  Carolina,  Arkansas  and  Tennessee  accounting  for  approximately  29%,  12%,  11%  and  8%, 
respectively, of the total number of domestic restaurants.   

Our History 

The  Company  has  offered  consumers  affordable,  high  quality  pizza  since  1958,  when  the  first  Pizza  Inn 
restaurant opened in Dallas, Texas.  We awarded our first franchise in 1963 and opened our first buffet restaurant in 
1969.  We began franchising the Pizza Inn brand internationally in the late 1970s.  In 1993, our stock began trading 
on  the  NASDAQ  Stock  Market,  and  presently  trades  on  the  NASDAQ  Capital  Market  under  the  ticker  symbol 
“RAVE.”  In June 2011, we opened the first Pie Five restaurant in Ft. Worth, Texas.  In November 2012, we signed 
our first franchise development agreement for Pie Five. 

  4 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Our Concepts 

We operate and franchise restaurant concepts under two distinct brands: Pie Five and Pizza Inn.   

Pie Five 

Pie Five is a fast-casual pizza concept that creates individualized pizzas which are baked in 140 seconds in 
our  specially  designed  oven.    Pizzas  are  created  at  the  direction  of  our  customers  who  choose  from  a  variety  of 
freshly  prepared  and  displayed  toppings,  cheeses,  sauces  and  doughs  and  complete  their  purchase  process  in  less 
than  five  minutes.    Customers  can  also  get  freshly  prepared  entrée  and  side  salads,  also  made  to  order  from  our 
recipes or at the customer's direction.  They can also choose from several baked daily desserts like brownies, cookie 
pies,  and  cakes.    A  variety  of  soft  beverages  are  available,  as  well  as  beer  and  wine  in  some  locations.    Pie  Five 
restaurants offer items at prices from $5.49 to $9.99, and the average ticket price per meal, including a drink,  was 
approximately $8.98 per person for fiscal year 2015. The average per person ticket is slightly higher in restaurants 
offering beer and wine. 

Pie Five restaurants typically  occupy leased, in-line or end-cap space of between  1,800 and 2,400 square 
feet in retail strip or multi-unit retail space.  The restaurants typically are located in high traffic, high visibility urban 
or suburban sites in mid- to large-size metropolitan areas.  With seating for 65 to 85 customers in most units, and 
patio seating where available, Pie Five restaurants primarily serve lunch and dinner to families, adults and kids of all 
ages.  Sales are predominantly on-premise though carry out is offered as well. Future sales growth initiatives may 
include expanded text ordering and catering services.  Due to the relatively compact footprint of the restaurants, and 
other operating advantages, we also believe Pie Five is well suited for non-traditional locations such as airports. 

Pizza Inn 

We  operate  Buffet  Units,  Delco  Units  and  Express  Units  under  the  Pizza  Inn  brand.    Buffet  Units  and 
Delco Units  feature  crusts that are hand-made  from dough  made fresh in the restaurant  each day.  Our pizzas are 
made  with  a  proprietary  all-in-one  flour  mixture,  real  mozzarella  cheese  and  a  proprietary  mix  of  classic  pizza 
spices.  In international markets, the menu mix of toppings and side items is occasionally adapted to local tastes.     

Buffet  Units  offer  dine-in,  carryout  and  catering  service  and,  in  many  cases,  also  offer  delivery  service.  
Buffet Units offer a variety of pizza crusts with standard toppings and special combinations of toppings in addition 
to  pasta,  salad,  sandwiches,  appetizers,  desserts  and  beverages,  including  beer  and  wine  in  some  locations,  in  an 
informal,  family-oriented  atmosphere.    We  occasionally  offer  other  items  on  a  limited  promotional  basis.    Buffet 
Units  are  generally  located  in  free  standing  buildings  or  strip  center  locations  in  retail  developments  in  close 
proximity to offices, shopping centers and residential areas.  The current standard Buffet Units are between 2,100 
and 4,500 square feet in size  and seat 120 to 185 customers.  The interior decor is designed to promote a casual, 
lively,  contemporary,  family-style  atmosphere.    Some  Buffet  Units  feature  game  rooms  that  offer  a  range  of 
electronic game entertainment for the entire family.  The buffet is typically offered at prices from $3.49 to $7.49, 
and  the  average  ticket  price,  including  a  drink,  was  approximately  $9.52  per  person  for  fiscal  year  2015.    The 
average per person ticket is slightly higher in restaurants offering beer and wine. 

Delco Units offer delivery and carryout service only and are typically located in shopping centers or other 
in-line  retail  developments.    Delco  Units  typically  offer  a  variety  of  crusts  and  some  combination  of  side  items.  
Delco Units occupy approximately 1,200 square feet, are primarily production facilities and, in most instances, do 
not offer seating.    The decor of the Delco Unit is designed to be bright and highly visible and feature neon lighted 
displays and awnings.  We have attempted to locate Delco Units strategically to facilitate timely delivery service and 
to provide easy access for carryout service.  

Express  Units serve our customers through a  variety of  non-traditional points of sale.    Express  Units are 
typically located in a convenience store, food court, college campus, airport terminal, travel plaza, athletic facility or 
other commercial facility.  They have limited or no seating and solely offer quick carryout service of a limited menu 
of pizza and other foods and beverages.  An Express Unit typically occupies approximately 200 to 400 square feet 
and  is  commonly  operated  by  the  operator  or  food  service  licensee  of  the  commercial  host  facility.    We  have 
developed a high-quality pre-prepared crust that is topped and cooked on-site, allowing this concept to offer a lower 
initial investment and reduced labor and operating costs  while  maintaining product quality and consistency.   Like 
Delco  Units,  Express  Units  are  primarily  production-oriented  facilities  and,  therefore,  do  not  require  all  of  the 
equipment, labor or square footage of the Buffet Unit.   

  5 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
Site Selection 

We  consider  the  restaurant  site  selection  process  critical  to  a  restaurant’s  long-term  success  and  devote 
significant  resources  to  the  investigation  and  evaluation  of  potential  sites.  The  site  selection  process  includes  a 
review  of  trade  area  demographics  through  the  use  of  a  third  party  customer  and  site  selection  tool,  as  well  as  a 
proprietary  evaluation  process.    We  may  also  rely  on  a  franchisee’s  knowledge  of  the  trade  area  and  market 
characteristics when selecting a location for a franchised restaurant. A member of our development team visits each 
potential domestic restaurant location.   

Development and Operations 

New Unit Development 

We  intend  to  expand  the  Pizza  Inn  system  domestically  and  internationally  in  markets  with  significant 
long-term  growth  potential  and  where  we  believe  we  can  use  our  competitive  strengths  to  establish  brand 
recognition and gain local market share.  While we plan to expand our Pizza Inn branded domestic restaurant base 
primarily  through  opening  new  franchised  restaurants  with  new  and  existing  franchisees,  we  will  continue  to 
evaluate our mix of Company-owned and franchised restaurants.  We  will evaluate the development of new Pizza 
Inn Buffet and Delco Units in international markets in fiscal 2016, particularly in the Middle East. 

In appropriate circumstances, we grant area developer rights for Pizza Inn restaurants in new and existing 
domestic  markets.    A  Pizza  Inn  area  developer  typically  pays  a  negotiated  fee  to  purchase  the  right  to  operate  or 
develop restaurants within a defined territory and, typically, agrees to a multi-restaurant development schedule. The 
area developer assists us in local franchise service and quality control in exchange for half of the franchise fees and 
royalties from all restaurants within the territory during the term of the agreement.   

In fiscal 2016, we intend to continue developing franchised Pie Five Units.  As of August 25, 2015, we had 
32  franchised  units  open  and  had  executed  multi-year  development  agreements  with  21  franchisees  for  up  to  an 
additional 375 Pie Five Units to be located in the U.S., including Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Delaware, 
Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, 
New  Jersey,  New  Mexico,  North  Carolina,  Oklahoma,  Pennsylvania,  Tennessee,  Texas,  Virginia,  Wisconsin  and 
Washington  D.C.    The  number  of  Pie  Five  Units  subject  to  a  development  agreement  is  scaled  relative  to  the 
estimated  development  potential  of  the  specified  geographic  area  and  requires  the  franchisee  to  achieve  specified 
unit development milestones over a period of time, typically five years, to maintain their development rights in the 
area.  The rate at which we will be able to continue to expand the Pie Five concept through franchise development is 
determined  in  part  by  our  success  at  selecting  qualified  franchisees,  by  our  ability  to  identify  satisfactory  sites  in 
appropriate markets and by our ability to continue training and monitoring our franchisees.  We intend to continue to 
focus on franchise development opportunities with experienced, well-capitalized, multi-restaurant operators.   

In  fiscal  2016,  we  also  intend  to  continue  to  develop  Company-owned  Pie  Five  Units  in  selected 
metropolitan areas throughout the United States.  Our ability to open new Company-owned Pie Five Units is largely 
dependent  on  our  ability  to  identify  and  secure  suitable  locations,  to  manage  and  fund  the  development  of  such 
locations and to train and staff the restaurants.  

Domestic Franchise Operations 

Franchise  and  development  agreements.    We  discontinued  offering  new  Delco  Franchises  during  fiscal 

2014.  Our current standard forms of franchise agreements provide for the following basic terms:  

  6 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Since  the Pizza Inn concept  was  first  franchised in 1963, industry  franchising concepts and development 
strategies  have  evolved,  and  our  present  franchise  relationships  are  evidenced  by  a  variety  of  contractual  forms.  
Common to those forms are provisions that: (i) require the franchisee to follow the Pizza Inn system of restaurant 
operation and management, (ii) require the franchisee to pay a franchise fee and continuing royalties, and (iii) except 
for Express Units, prohibit the development of one restaurant within a specified distance from another. 

  We  launched  the  franchise  program  for  Pie  Five  in  fiscal  2013.    Based  on  the  Pie  Five  development 
agreements currently in effect, we anticipate allocating significant internal resources to the growth of our Pie Five 
franchise and development operation in fiscal 2016.  Our Pie Five franchise agreement requires that the franchisees: 
(i)  follow  the  Pie  Five  system  of  restaurant  operation  and  management,  (ii)  pay  a  franchise  fee  and  continuing 
royalties, (iii) contribute a specified percentage of sales to a marketing fund managed by the Company, and (iv) only 
open restaurants that comply with site and design standards determined by the Company. 

Training.    We  offer  numerous  training  programs  for  the  benefit  of  franchisees  and  their  restaurant  crew 
managers.  The training programs, taught by experienced Company employees, focus on food preparation, service, 
cost  control,  sanitation,  safety,  local  store  marketing,  personnel  management  and  other  aspects  of  restaurant 
operation.    The  training  programs  include  group  classes,  supervised  work  in  Company-owned  restaurants  and 
special field seminars.  Initial and certain supplemental training programs are offered free of charge to franchisees, 
who  pay  their  own  travel  and  lodging  expenses.    New  franchisees  also  receive  on-site  training  from  Company 
employees  to  assist  with  their  first  two  restaurant  openings  under  their  development  agreements.    Restaurant 
managers train their staff through on-the-job training, utilizing video and printed materials produced by us. 

Standards.  We require franchisee adherence to a variety of standards designed to ensure proper operations 
and  to  protect  and  enhance  the  Pie  Five  and  Pizza  Inn  brands.    All  franchisees  are  required  to  operate  their 
restaurants  in  compliance  with  these  written  policies,  standards  and  specifications,  which  include  matters  such  as 
menu  items,  ingredients,  materials,  supplies,  services,  furnishings,  decor  and  signs.    Our  efforts  to  maintain 
consistent operations may result, from time to time, in the closing of certain restaurants that have not achieved and 
maintained  a  consistent  standard  of  quality  or  operations.  We  also  maintain  adherence  to  our  standards  through 
ongoing support and education of our franchisees by our franchise business consultants, who are deployed locally in 
markets where our franchisees are located.   

Company-Owned Restaurant Operations   

As  of  June  28,  2015,  we  operated  two  Buffet  Units  and  24  Pie  Five  Units,  primarily  in  the  Dallas/Fort 
Worth, Houston and Chicago metropolitan areas. We do not currently intend to operate any Delco Units or Express 
Units.  Our ability to open Company-owned restaurants is affected by a number of factors, including the terms of 
available  financing  and  our  ability  to  locate  suitable  sites,  negotiate  acceptable  lease  or  purchase  terms,  secure 
appropriate  local  governmental  permits  and  approvals,  supervise  construction  and  recruit  and  train  management 
personnel.    In  addition  to  generating  revenues  and  earnings,  we  use  domestic  Company-owned  restaurants  as  test 
sites for new products and promotions as well as restaurant operational improvements and as a forum for training 
new managers and franchisees.   

Developing  Company-owned  Pie  Five  Units  in  multiple  metropolitan  areas  is  a  key  component  of  our 
strategic plan.  In addition to providing the Company with an attractive economic return, we believe that developing 
a  domestic network of  Company-owned  Pie Five  Units is  an important  aspect of our strategy  for growing the Pie 
Five system.  Growth in both the franchised and Company-owned Pie Five Units in operation improves the system’s 

  7 

Buffet UnitExpress UnitPie Five UnitDevelopment fee per unit-                  -                  5,000          Franchise fee per unit25,000        5,000          20,000        Initial franchise term20 years5 years10 yearsRenewal period10 years5 years5 yearsRoyalty rate % of sales4%5%6%National Ad fund % of sales1%2%2%Required total ad spending % of sales5%2%5%Pizza Inn 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
overall  economies  of  scale  for  advertising,  marketing,  information  systems,  distribution  and  procurement  of  food 
products,  and  other  costs.    In  fiscal  2016,  we  plan  to  allocate  additional  resources  to  developing  and  operating 
Company-owned Pie Five Units.   

International Franchise Operations 

We  also  offer  master  license  rights  to  develop  Pizza  Inn  restaurants  in  certain  foreign  countries,  with 
negotiated  fees,  development  schedules  and  ongoing  royalties.    A  master  licensee  for  a  foreign  country  pays  a 
negotiated fee to purchase the right to develop and operate Pizza Inn restaurants within a defined territory, typically 
for a term of 20 years, plus a ten-year renewal option.  The master licensee agrees to a multi-restaurant development 
schedule and we train the master licensee to monitor and assist franchisees in their territory with local service and 
quality control, with support from us.  In return, the master licensee typically retains half the franchise fees and half 
the  royalties  on  all  restaurants  within  the  territory  during  the  term  of  the  agreement.    Master  licensees  may  open 
restaurants  that  they  own  and  operate,  or  they  may  open  sub-franchised  restaurants  owned  and  operated  by  third 
parties through agreements with the master licensee, but subject to our approval. 

Our first franchised restaurant outside of the United States opened in the late 1970s.  As of  June 28, 2015, 
there were 71 Pizza Inn restaurants operating internationally. With the exception of two restaurants in Honduras and 
one  in  Bangladesh,  all  of  the  restaurants  operated  or  sub-licensed  by  our  international  master  licensees  are  in  the 
United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia and adjoining countries. Our ability to continue to develop select international 
markets is affected by a number of factors, including our ability to locate experienced, well-capitalized developers 
who  can  commit  to  an  aggressive  multi-restaurant  development  schedule  and  achieve  maximum  initial  market 
penetration  with  minimal  supervision by  us.  In the future,  we  may also pursue international opportunities  for the 
development of Pie Five franchisees. 

Food and Supply Distribution 

Our  Norco  division  provides  product  sourcing,  purchasing,  quality  assurance,  research  and  development, 
franchisee order and billing services, and logistics support functions for both the Pizza Inn and Pie Five restaurant 
systems.    We  outsource  our  warehousing  and  distribution  services  to  reputable  and  experienced  restaurant 
distribution companies, including Performance Food Group, Inc. and its affiliates.  The distributors make deliveries 
to  all  domestic  restaurants  from  several  distribution  centers,  with  delivery  territories  and  responsibilities  for  each 
determined  according  to  geographical  region.    We  believe  this  division  of  responsibilities  for  our  purchasing, 
franchisee support and distribution systems has resulted in lower operating  costs and logistical efficiencies.  Norco 
also arranges for the distribution of certain products and equipment to some international franchisees. 

Effective  in  the  third  quarter  of  fiscal  2015,  we  changed  our  distribution  arrangements  to  shift  the 
responsibility for maintaining system-wide inventory from Norco to third party distributors.  As a result, as of June 
28,  2015,  inventory  consisted  primarily  of  food,  paper  products  and  supplies  stored  in  and  used  by  Company 
restaurants. 

Norco  is  able  to  leverage  the  advantages  of  direct  vendor  negotiations  and  volume  purchasing  of  food, 
equipment  and  supplies  for  the  franchisees’  benefit  in  the  form  of  a  concentrated,  one-truck  delivery  system, 
competitive  pricing  and  product  consistency.    Franchisees  are  able  to  purchase  all  products  and  ingredients  from 
Norco  and  have  them  delivered  by  experienced  and  efficient  distributors.    In  order  to  assure  product  quality  and 
consistency, our  franchisees are required to purchase from  Norco certain food products that are proprietary to the 
Pizza  Inn  and  Pie  Five  systems,  including  cheese,  pizza  sauce,  flour  mixture,  certain  meats  and  spice  blend.    In 
addition,  franchisees  purchase  other  non-proprietary  food  products  and  supplies  from  Norco.    Alternatively, 
franchisees  may  also  purchase  non-proprietary  products  and  supplies  from  other  suppliers  who  meet  our 
requirements for quality and reliability.    

Non-proprietary food and ingredients, equipment and other supplies sold by Norco are generally available 
from several qualified sources.  With the exception of several proprietary food products, such as cheese and dough 
flour,  we  are  not  dependent  upon  any  one  supplier  or  a  limited  group  of  suppliers.    We  contract  with  established 
food processors for the production of our proprietary products according to our specifications.   

We  have  not  experienced  any  significant  shortages  of  supplies  or  any  delays  in  receiving  our  food  or 
beverage inventories, restaurant supplies or products, and do not anticipate any difficulty in obtaining inventories or 
supplies in the foreseeable future.  Prices charged to us by our suppliers are subject to fluctuation, and we typically 
pass  increased  costs  or  savings  on  to  our  franchisees  through  changes  in  product  pricing.    We  do  not  engage  in 

  8 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
commodity  hedging  but  enter  into  pricing  arrangements  for  up  to  a  year  in  advance  for  certain  high  volume 
products. 

Marketing and Advertising 

By communicating a common brand message at the regional, local market and restaurant levels, we believe 
we can create and reinforce a strong, consistent marketing message to consumers and increase our market share.  We 
offer or facilitate a number of ways for the brand image and message to be promoted at the local and regional levels. 

The Pizza Inn Advertising Plan Cooperative (“PIAP Cooperative”) is a Texas cooperative association that 
is responsible for creating and producing  various marketing programs and materials, which may include  print and 
digital advertisements, direct mail materials, social media and e-mail marketing, television and radio commercials, 
in-store  promotional  materials,  and  related  marketing  and  public  relations  services.    Each  operator  of  a  domestic 
Buffet  Unit  or  Delco  Unit  is  entitled  to  membership  in  PIAP  Cooperative.    Nearly  all  of  our  existing  Pizza  Inn 
franchise  agreements  for  Buffet  Units  and  Delco  Units  require  the  franchisees  to  become  members  of  PIAP 
Cooperative.  Members contribute 1% of their sales to PIAP Cooperative.  PIAP Cooperative is managed by a board 
of trustees comprised of franchisee representatives who are elected by the members each year.  We do not have any 
ownership interest in PIAP Cooperative.  We provide certain administrative, marketing and other services to PIAP 
Cooperative and are paid by PIAP Cooperative for such services.  As of June 28, 2015, the Company-owned Buffet 
Units and substantially all of our domestic franchisees were members of PIAP Cooperative.  Operators of Express 
Units do not participate in PIAP Cooperative.  However, they contribute up to 1% of their sales directly to us to help 
fund  purchases  of  Express  Unit  marketing  materials  and  similar  expenditures.  International  franchisees  do  not 
participate in PIAP Cooperative.   

In  the  past  year  we  have  allocated  additional  resources  to  the  development  and  execution  of  marketing 
programs  for  the  Pie  Five  restaurant  system  to  benefit  Pie  Five  franchisees  and  Company-owned  restaurants  in 
different metropolitan areas.  Pie Five franchisees contribute a specified percentage of their sales to the Company to 
fund the creation and production of various marketing and advertising programs and materials, which may include 
print  and  digital  advertisements,  direct  mail  materials,  customer  satisfaction  systems,  social  media  and  e-mail 
marketing,  television  and  radio  commercials,  in-store  promotional  materials,  and  related  marketing  and  public 
relations services.  We anticipate continuing to expand Pie Five marketing activities commensurate with the growth 
of the Pie Five system.   

Pizza  Inn  and  Pie  Five  franchisees  are  required  to  conduct  independent  marketing  efforts  in  addition  to 
their participation in the national marketing programs for each brand.  We provide Company-owned and franchised 
restaurants with access to an assortment of local store marketing materials, including pre-approved print, radio, and 
digital  media  marketing  materials.    We  also  provide  local  store  marketing  materials  and  programs  specifically  to 
support new restaurant openings. 

Trademarks and Quality Control 

We own various trademarks, including the names “Pizza Inn” and “Pie Five,” that are used in connection 
with the restaurants and have been registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office.  The duration of 
our trademarks is unlimited, subject to periodic renewal and continued use.  In addition, we have obtained trademark 
registrations for our marks in several foreign countries and have periodically re-filed and applied for registration in 
others.  We believe that we hold the necessary rights for protection of the trademarks essential to our business. 

Government Regulation 

We  and our  franchisees are subject to various federal, state and local laws affecting  the operation of our 
restaurants.  Each restaurant is subject to licensing and regulation by a number of governmental authorities, which 
include  health,  safety,  sanitation,  wage  and  hour,  alcoholic  beverage,  building  and  fire  agencies  in  the  state  or 
municipality in which the restaurant is located.  Difficulties in obtaining, or the failure to obtain, required licenses or 
approvals could delay or prevent the opening of a new restaurant or require the temporary or permanent closing of 
existing restaurants in a particular area. 

We are subject to Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) regulation and to various state laws regulating the 
offer  and  sale  of  franchises.    The  FTC  requires  us  to  furnish  to  prospective  franchisees  a  franchise  disclosure 
document  containing  prescribed  information.    Substantive  state  laws  that  regulate  the  franchisor-franchisee 
relationship presently exist in a number of states, and bills have been introduced in Congress from time to time that 

  9 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
would  provide  for  further  federal  regulation  of  the  franchisor-franchisee  relationship  in  certain  respects.    Some 
foreign  countries  also  have  disclosure  requirements  and  other  laws  regulating  franchising  and  the  franchisor-
franchisee relationship.     

Employees 

As of August 25, 2015, we had 557 employees, including 53 in our corporate office and 57 full-time and 
447  part-time  employees  at  the  Company-owned  restaurants.    None  of  our  employees  are  currently  covered  by 
collective bargaining agreements. 

Industry and Competition 

The  restaurant  industry  is  intensely  competitive  with  respect  to  price,  service,  location  and  food  quality, 
and there are many well-established competitors with substantially greater brand recognition and financial and other 
resources than the Company.  Competitors include a large number of international, national and regional restaurant 
and  pizza  chains,  as  well  as  local  restaurants  and  pizza  operators.    Some  of  our  competitors  may  be  better 
established in the markets where our restaurants are or may be located.  Within the pizza segment of the restaurant 
industry,  we believe  that our  primary competitors are national pizza chains and several regional chains,  including 
chains executing a “take and bake” concept.  We also compete against the frozen pizza products available at grocery 
stores and large superstore retailers.  In recent years several competitors have developed fast-casual pizza concepts 
that compete with Pie Five in certain metropolitan areas.  A change in the pricing or other market strategies of one 
or more of our competitors could have an adverse impact on our sales and earnings. 

With respect to the sale of franchises, we compete with many franchisors of restaurants and other business 
concepts.  We believe that the principal competitive factors affecting the sale of franchises are product quality, price, 
value,  consumer  acceptance,  franchisor  experience  and  support,  and  the  quality  of  the  relationship  maintained 
between the franchisor and its franchisees.  In general, there is also active competition for management personnel 
and attractive commercial real estate sites suitable for our restaurants.   

Our  Norco  division  competes  with  both  national  and  local  distributors  of  food  and  other  restaurant 
suppliers.    The  distribution  industry  is  very  competitive.    We  believe  that  the  principal  competitive  factors  in  the 
distribution industry are product quality, customer service and price.  Norco or its designees are the sole authorized 
suppliers of certain proprietary products that all Pizza Inn or Pie Five restaurants are required to use. 

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS. 

Not required for a smaller reporting company. 

ITEM 1B.  UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS. 

Not applicable. 

ITEM 2.  PROPERTIES. 

The Company leases its 38,130 square foot corporate office facility pursuant to a sale-leaseback transaction 
with average annual lease payments of approximately $11.00 per square foot.  This lease began on December 19, 
2006 and has a ten year term. In August 2011, we secured a three year term sublease at $14.50 per square foot for 
18,360 square feet of the building beginning December 1, 2011.  

As of June 28, 2015, the Company also operated two Pizza Inn Buffet Units and 24 Pie Five Units from 
leased locations.  The operating leases cover premises from 1,765 to 4,634 square feet and have initial terms of from 
five to ten years at base rental rates of $18.00 to $42.00 per square foot and contain provisions permitting renewal 
for one or more specified terms. 

The  Company  has  two  leases  for  Buffet  Units  in  Texas  that  were  closed  in  fiscal  2008  and  2014. These 
leased properties are 4,000 and 4,347 square feet, have annual rental rates of approximately $13.00 and $30.00 per 
square  foot  and  expire  in  2015  and  2020,  respectively.    The  Company  is  currently  pursuing  alternatives  for 
subleasing or terminating these leases. 

  10 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ITEM 3.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS. 

The Company is subject to claims and legal actions in the ordinary course of its business.  The Company 
believes that all such claims and actions currently pending against it are either adequately covered by insurance or 
would  not  have  a  material  adverse  effect  on  the  Company’s  annual  results  of  operations,  cash  flows  or  financial 
condition if decided in a manner that is unfavorable to the Company.  

ITEM 4.  MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES. 

Not applicable. 

  11 

 
 
 
 
 
 
PART II 

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS 

AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES. 

As of August 25, 2015, there were approximately 1,933 stockholders of record of the Company's common 

stock. 

The Company had no sales of unregistered securities during fiscal 2015 or 2014. 

The  Company's  common  stock  is  listed  on  the  Capital  Market  of  the  NASDAQ  Stock  Market,  LLC 
(“NASDAQ”) under the symbol “RAVE”. The following table shows the highest and lowest price per share of the 
common stock during each quarterly period within the two most recent fiscal years, as reported by NASDAQ.  Such 
prices reflect inter-dealer quotations, without adjustment for any retail markup, markdown or commission. 

The Company did not pay any dividends on its common stock during the fiscal years ended  June 28, 2015 
or June 29, 2014.  Any determination to pay cash dividends in the future will be at the discretion of the Company’s 
board  of  directors  and  will  be  dependent  upon  the  Company’s  results  of  operations,  financial  condition,  capital 
requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors deemed relevant.  Currently, there is no intention to pay any 
dividends on our common stock.  

2007 Stock Purchase Plan 

On  May  23,  2007,  the  Company’s  board  of  directors  approved  a  stock  purchase  plan  (the  “2007  Stock 
Purchase Plan”) authorizing the purchase on our behalf of up to 1,016,000 shares of our common stock in the open 
market  or  in  privately  negotiated  transactions.    On  June  2,  2008,  the  Company’s  board  of  directors  amended  the 
2007  Stock  Purchase  Plan  to  increase  the  number  of  shares  of  common  stock  the  Company  may  repurchase  by 
1,000,000 shares to a total of 2,016,000 shares. On April 22, 2009 the Company’s board of directors amended the 
2007 Stock Purchase Plan again to increase the number of shares of common stock the Company may repurchase by 
1,000,000  shares  to  a  total  of  3,016,000  shares.  The  2007 Stock  Purchase  Plan  does  not  have  an  expiration  date.  
There were no stock purchases in the fiscal year ended June 28, 2015. 

The Company’s ability to purchase shares of our common stock is subject to various laws, regulations and 
policies as well as the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).   Subsequent 
to June 28, 2015, the Company has not repurchased any outstanding shares but may make further purchases under 
the 2007 Stock Purchase Plan.  The Company may also purchase shares of our common stock other than pursuant to 
the 2007 Stock Purchase Plan or other publicly announced plans or programs. 

  12 

HighLowFiscal 2015:Fourth Quarter Ended 6/28/201515.93$       10.72$             Third Quarter Ended 3/29/201516.20          6.96                 Second Quarter Ended 12/28/20148.23            6.12                 First Quarter Ended 9/28/20148.63            5.96                 Fiscal 2014:Fourth Quarter Ended 6/29/20146.74$          5.41$               Third Quarter Ended 3/30/20148.29            5.38                 Second Quarter Ended 12/29/20139.09            7.15                 First Quarter Ended 9/29/20138.21            5.51                  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Equity Compensation Plan Information 

The following table furnishes information with respect to the Company’s equity compensation plans as of 

June 28, 2015: 

Additional  information  regarding  equity  compensation  can  be  found  in  the  notes  to  the  consolidated 

financial statements. 

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA 

Not required for a smaller reporting company. 

ITEM  7.  MANAGEMENT'S  DISCUSSION  AND  ANALYSIS  OF  FINANCIAL  CONDITION  AND 

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS. 

Results of Operations 

The  following  discussion  should  be  read  in  conjunction  with  the  consolidated  financial  statements  and 
accompanying notes appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and may contain certain forward-
looking statements.  See “Forward-Looking Statements.”   

Overview 

The Company operates and franchises pizza buffet, delivery/carry-out and express restaurants domestically 
and  internationally  under  the  trademark  “Pizza  Inn”  and  operates  domestic  fast  casual  pizza  restaurants  under  the 
trademarks  “Pie  Five  Pizza  Company”  or  “Pie  Five”.  We  provide  or  facilitate  food,  equipment  and  supply 
distribution to our domestic and international system of restaurants through our Norco Restaurant Services Company 
division  and  through  agreements  with  third  party  distributors.  At  June  28,  2015,  Company-owned  and  franchised 
restaurants consisted of the following:  

  13 

Number of securities toWeighted-averageNumber of securitiesbe issued upon exerciseexercise price of remaining available for Planof outstanding options, outstanding options, future issuance underCategorywarrants, and rightswarrants, and rightsequity compensation plansEquity compensationplans approved bysecurity holders871,798                         $3.511,200,000                           Equity compensationplans not approved bysecurity holders-                                      $   -   -                                           Total871,798                         $3.511,200,000                           (in thousands, except unit data)EndingRetailEndingRetailEndingRetailUnitsSalesUnitsSalesUnitsSalesCompany-Owned2              1,471$    24            11,398$  26            12,869$   Domestic Franchised177          91,480    30            13,940    207          105,420   Total Domestic Units179          92,951$  54            25,338$  233          118,289$ International Franchised71            -               71            Pizza InnPie FiveAll Concepts 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
The domestic restaurants were located in 25 states predominately situated in the southern half of the United 

States.  The international restaurants were located in seven foreign countries.  

Basic  and  diluted  loss  per  common  share  increased  $0.01  to  a  loss  of  $0.19  and  $0.18,  respectively,  for 
fiscal 2015, compared to $0.18 and $0.17, respectively, in the prior fiscal year.  Net loss increased $0.2 million to a 
loss of $1.8 million for fiscal 2015 compared to a loss of $1.6 million for the prior fiscal year on revenues of $48.2 
million for fiscal 2015 as compared to $42.2 million  in fiscal 2014.  The increase in net loss from prior year  was 
primarily due to increased pre-opening expenses and higher general and administrative and franchise costs related to 
additional  personnel  and  other  resources  to  support  the  growth  of  Pie  Five  franchising  and  opening  of  Company-
owned restaurants.   

Adjusted EBITDA for the fiscal year ended June 28, 2015, improved $0.9 million to a positive $0.6 million 
compared to a negative $0.3 million for the comparable period of the prior fiscal year.  The following table sets forth 
a reconciliation of net income to Adjusted EBITDA for the periods shown (in thousands): 

Results of operations for fiscal 2015 and 2014 both included 52 weeks. 

  14 

June 28,June 29,20152014Net Loss(1,839)$        (1,567)$        Interest Expense113               142               Income Taxes(670)              (760)              Income Taxes--Discontinued Operations(86)                (58)                Depreciation and amortization1,617            1,454            EBITDA(865)$            (789)$            Stock compensation expense128               68                  Pre-opening costs721               161               Asset disposals, closure costs and restaurant impairment586               275               Adjusted EBITDA570$             (285)$            Fiscal Year Ended 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pie Five Brand Summary 

The  following  tables  summarize  certain  key  indicators  for  the  Pie  Five  franchised  and  Company-owned 

restaurants that management believes are useful in evaluating performance. 

Pie  Five  system-wide  retail  sales  increased  $14.4  million,  or  131.2%,  for  the  fiscal  year  ended  June  28, 
2015  when  compared  to  the  prior  year.    System-wide  average  weekly  sales  improved  by  $2,439,  or  19.6%,  from 
$12,468 in fiscal year 2014 to $14,907 for fiscal year 2015.  Compared to the fiscal year 2014, average units open in 
the period increased from 17 to 32.  Comparable store retail sales increased by 11.2% during fiscal 2015 compared 
to fiscal 2014. 

The following chart summarizes Pie Five restaurant activity for the fiscal year ended June 28, 2015: 

We  believe  that  the  net  addition  of  34  Pie  Five  Units  during  fiscal  2015  reflects  the  continuation  of  an 
accelerated pace of growth in the opening of Pie Five Units as franchised stores begin to open pursuant to previously 
executed franchise development agreements and the Company continues to develop its own stores in the Dallas-Fort 
Worth,  Houston,  Chicago  and  other  metropolitan  areas.    The  two  closed  franchised  locations  were  related  to  the 
conversion of a market region from a franchise market to a Company market. 

  15 

June 28,June 29,20152014Pie Five Retail Sales - Total Stores   Domestic - Franchised13,940$   2,857$        Domestic - Company-owned11,398     8,101        Total domestic retail sales25,338$   10,958$   Pie Five Comparable Store Retail Sales - Total7,892$     7,100$     Pie Five Average Units Open in Period   Domestic - Franchised16             5                  Domestic - Company-owned16             12             Total domestic Units32             17             Fiscal Year EndedBeginningEndingUnitsOpenedClosedUnitsDomestic - Franchised7               25             2               30             Domestic - Company-owned13             11             -                24             Total domestic Units20             36             2               54             Fiscal Year Ended June 28, 2015 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Average weekly sales for Company-owned Pie Five restaurants increased $906, or 7.1%, to $13,693 for the 
fiscal year ended June 28, 2015 compared to $12,787 for the same period of prior year. Company-owned Pie Five 
restaurant operating cash flow increased $0.8 million, or 75.0%, during the fiscal year 2015 compared to the same 
period of prior year.  Loss from continuing operations before taxes for Company-owned Pie Five stores increased 
$0.1 million the fiscal year ended June 28, 2015 compared to the same period of the prior year.   

For the Pie Five Company-owned restaurants, the increase in sales and restaurant operating cash flow  was 

due to an increase in store count.   

  16 

Pie Five - Company-Owned Restaurants(in thousands, except store weeks and average data)Fiscal Year EndedSept 28,Dec 28,March 29,June 28,June 28,20142014201520152015Store weeks169          182         212          264         827                        Average weekly sales14,199    13,336    13,432    13,826    13,693                  Average number of units13            14            16            20            16                          Restaurant sales (excluding partial weeks)2,400      2,427      2,848      3,650      11,324                  Restaurant sales2,405      2,438      2,855      3,700      11,398                  Restaurant operating cash flow413          346         439          571         1,769                    Allocated marketing and advertising expenses(120)        (122)        (143)        (185)        (570)                      Depreciation/amortization expense  (274)        (267)        (319)        (384)        (1,244)                   Pre-opening costs  (35)          (137)        (195)        (354)        (721)                      Operations management and extraordinary expenses(41)          (100)        (51)          (229)        (421)                      Deferred rent adjustment (net) and impairment-               -               -               -               -                             Loss from continuing operations before taxes  (57)          (280)        (269)        (581)        (1,187)                   Fiscal Year EndedSept 29,Dec 29,March 30,June 29,June 29,20132013201420142014Store weeks139          156         169          169         633                        Average weekly sales11,896    11,802    13,186    14,030    12,787                  Average number of units11            12            13            13            12                          Restaurant sales (excluding partial weeks)1,654      1,841      2,228      2,371      8,094                    Restaurant sales1,659      1,843      2,228      2,371      8,101                    Restaurant operating cash flow164          161         316          370         1,011                    Allocated marketing and advertising expenses(83)          (92)          (111)        (119)        (405)                      Depreciation/amortization expense  (256)        (237)        (280)        (274)        (1,047)                   Pre-opening costs  (86)          (70)          (4)             (1)            (161)                      Operations management and extraordinary expenses(41)          (59)          (59)          (50)          (209)                      Deferred rent adjustment (net) and impairment-               3              -               (253)        (250)                      Loss from continuing operations before taxes  (302)        (294)        (138)        (327)        (1,061)                   Three Months EndedThree Months Ended 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pizza Inn Brand Summary  

The  following tables  summarize  certain  key indicators  for  the Pizza Inn  franchised and  Company-owned 

domestic restaurants that management believes are useful in evaluating performance. 

Total domestic Pizza Inn retail sales increased $0.7 million, or 0.8% compared to the prior year.  The 
increase in domestic retail sales was primarily due to a $3.5 million, or 4.1% increase in comparable store sales 
compared to the prior fiscal year, partially offset by stores that closed.  Loss from continuing operations before taxes 
for Pizza Inn Company-owned restaurants was $0.5 million for the fiscal year 2015 and $0.4 million for the fiscal 
year 2014.  The fiscal year 2015 loss includes a $0.3 million impairment charge for a Company-owned Pizza Inn 
restaurant with insufficient projected future cash flows to recover the value of its long-lived assets. 

The following chart summarizes Pizza Inn restaurant activity for the fiscal year ended June 28, 2015: 

We  believe  that  the  net  decrease  of  three  domestic  Pizza  Inn  units  during  fiscal  2015  reflects  an  overall 
improving  trend  in  net  domestic  store  closures.  The  number  of  international  Pizza  Inn  units  continues  to  remain 
steady. 

  17 

Pizza Inn Retail Sales - Total Domestic StoresJune 28,June 29,Domestic Units20152014       Buffet - Franchised83,539$   81,960$          Delco/Express - Franchised7,941        8,377               Buffet - Company-owned1,471        1,870        Total domestic retail sales92,951$   92,207$   Pizza Inn Comparable Store Retail Sales - Total Domestic87,547$   84,065$   Pizza Inn Average Units Open in PeriodDomestic Units       Buffet - Franchised100           105                  Delco/Express - Franchised75             73                    Buffet - Company-owned2               2               Total domestic units177           180           Fiscal Year EndedBeginningEndingUnitsOpenedClosedUnitsDomestic UnitsBuffet - Franchised103           2               6               99             Delco/Express - Franchised77             6               5               78             Buffet - Company-owned2               -                -                2               Total domestic Units182           8               11             179           International Units (all types)71             -                -                71             Total Units253           8               11             250           Fiscal Year Ended June 28, 2015 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Terms 

The  Company’s  financial  statements  are  prepared  in  accordance  with  United  States  generally  accepted 
accounting principles (“GAAP”).  However, the Company also presents and discusses certain non-GAAP financial 
measures that it believes are useful to investors as measures of operating performance. Management may also use 
such  non-GAAP  financial  measures  in  evaluating  the  effectiveness  of  business  strategies  and  for  planning  and 
budgeting  purposes.    However,  these  non-GAAP  financial  measures  should  not  be  viewed  as  an  alternative  or 
substitute for the results reflected in the Company’s GAAP financial statements. 

The following key performance indicators presented herein, some of which represent non-GAAP financial 

measures, have the meaning and are calculated as follows:  

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

“EBITDA” represents earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. 
 “Adjusted  EBITDA”  represents  earnings  before  interest,  taxes,  depreciation  and  amortization,  stock 
compensation expense, pre-opening expense, gain/loss on sale of assets, costs related to closed restaurants 
and impairment charges. 
“Retail sales” represents the restaurant sales reported by our franchisees and Company-owned restaurants, 
which may be segmented by brand or domestic/international locations. 
“System-wide retail sales” represents combined retail sales for franchisee and Company-owned restaurants 
for a specified brand. 
“Comparable store retail sales” includes the retail sales for restaurants that have been open for at least 18 
months as of the end of the reporting period. The sales results for a restaurant that was closed temporarily 
for remodeling or relocation within the same trade area are included in the calculation only for the days that 
the restaurant was open in both periods being compared. 
“Store  weeks”  represent  the  total  number  of  full  weeks  that  specified  restaurants  were  open  during  the 
period. 
“Average  units  open”  reflects  the  number  of  restaurants  open  during  a  reporting  period  weighted  by  the 
percentage of the weeks in a reporting period that each restaurant was open. 
“Average  weekly  sales”  for  a  specified  period  is  calculated  as  total  retail  sales  (excluding  partial  weeks) 
divided by store weeks in the period. 
“Restaurant  operating  cash  flow”  represents  the  pre-tax  income  earned  by  Company-owned  restaurants 
before (1) allocated marketing and advertising expenses, (2) depreciation and amortization, (3) pre-opening 
expenses,  (4)  operations  management  and  extraordinary  expenses  and  (5)  deferred  rent  adjustment  (net) 
and impairment. 
“Pre-opening  expenses”  consist  primarily  of  certain  costs  incurred  prior  to  the  opening  of  a  restaurant, 
including: (1) marketing and promotional expenses, (2) accrued rent,  and (3) manager salaries, employee 
payroll and related training costs. 

Financial Results 

Revenues: 

Revenues are derived  from  (1) sales of  food, paper products and  supplies from Norco to franchisees,  (2) 
franchise  royalties  and  franchise  fees,  and  (3)  Company-owned  restaurant  operations.  Financial  results  are 
dependent  in  large  part  upon  the  volume,  pricing  and  cost  of  the  products  and  supplies  sold  to  franchisees.  The 
volume  of  products  sold  by  Norco  to  franchisees  is  dependent  on  the  level  of  franchisee  chain-wide  retail  sales, 
which  are  impacted  by  changes  in  comparable  store  sales  and  restaurant  count,  and  the  mix  of  products  sold  to 
franchisees through Norco rather than through third-party food distributors. 

Total revenues for fiscal 2015 and for the same period in the prior fiscal year were $48.2 million and $42.2 

million, respectively.  Revenue for these periods consisted of the following: 

  18 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Food and Supply Sales 

Food and supply sales by Norco include food and paper products and other distribution revenues. For fiscal 
2015, food and supply sales increased 6.9% to $30.8 million compared to $28.8 million for the prior fiscal year due 
to an increase in sales to franchisees.  This increase was driven by a $12.2 million, or 13.1%, increase in domestic 
franchisee retail sales attributable to an increase in the average number of stores open and an increase in comparable 
store sales in the current year when compared to prior year.   

Franchise Revenue 

Franchise  revenue,  which  includes  income  from  domestic  and  international  royalties  and  license  fees, 
increased to $4.5  million  for  fiscal 2015 compared to $3.4  million  for the prior fiscal  year as the result of  higher 
domestic  and  international  royalties  resulting  from  higher  franchisee  retail  sales  and  an  increase  in  franchise  and 
development fees due to increased Pie Five store openings. 

Restaurant Sales 

Restaurant sales, which consist of revenue generated by Company-owned restaurants, increased 29.1%, or 
$2.9 million, to $12.9 million for fiscal 2015 compared to $10.0 million for the prior fiscal year.  This increase was 
due to 11 new Company-owned Pie Five Units in fiscal 2015, partially offset by the closing of one Company-owned 
Pizza Inn buffet restaurant in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014. 

Costs and Expenses: 

Cost of Sales 

Cost  of  sales  primarily  includes  food  and  supply  costs,  distribution  fees,  labor  and  general  and 
administrative expenses directly related to restaurant  sales. These costs increased 13.7%, or $5.0 million, to $41.3 
million  for  fiscal  2015  compared  to  $36.3  million  for  the  prior  fiscal  year.    The  increase  in  cost  of  sales  was 
primarily due to the increased number of Company-owned Pie Five restaurants compared to the prior year. 

Franchise Expenses 

Franchise  expenses  include  selling,  general  and  administrative  expenses  directly  related  to  the  sale  and 
continuing  service  of  domestic  and  international  franchises.    These  expenses  increased  to  $3.2  million  from  $2.9 
million  in the  prior fiscal  year  primarily due to  higher payroll, travel and  marketing costs during fiscal 2015 as a 
result of the addition of personnel to develop and grow the Pie Five franchise system.   

General and Administrative Expenses 

General  and  administrative  expenses  increased  $0.4  million  to  $4.8  million  for  fiscal  2015  compared  to 
$4.4 million for the prior fiscal year primarily due to operating expenses associated with new Company-owned Pie 
Five restaurants and future growth plans.  

Pre-Opening Expense 

The Company's pre-opening costs are expensed as incurred and generally include payroll and other direct 
costs associated with training new managers and employees prior to opening  a new restaurant, rent and other unit 
operating expenses incurred prior to opening, and promotional costs associated with the opening of Company-owned 
restaurants.  Pre-opening expenses increased to $0.7 million from $0.2 million in the prior year primarily due to the 
accelerating rate of Pie Five store openings. 

  19 

June 28,June 29,20152014Food and supply sales30,787$        28,810$        Franchise revenue4,543            3,443            Restaurant sales12,869          9,971            Total revenue48,199$        42,224$         
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Impairment Expenses 

The  Company  reviews  long-lived  assets  for  impairment  when  events  or  circumstances  indicate  that  the 
carrying  value  of  such  assets  may  not  be  fully  recoverable.  Impairment  is  evaluated  based  on  the  sum  of 
undiscounted estimated future cash flows expected to result from use of an asset compared to its carrying value. If 
impairment is recognized, the carrying value of the impaired asset is reduced to its fair value, based on discounted 
estimated future cash flows. During fiscal year 2015, the Company tested its long-lived assets for impairment and 
recognized  pre-tax,  non-cash  impairment  charges  of  $0.3  million  related  to  the  carrying  value  of  one  Pizza  Inn 
restaurant. 

Provision for Bad Debt 

Bad debt provision related to accounts receivable from franchisees decreased to $0.2 million in fiscal 2015 
compared  to  $0.3  million  in  the  prior  year.    The  Company  believes  that  this  provision  and  related  allowance  for 
doubtful  accounts  adequately  reserves  for  outstanding  receivables  due  from  franchisees  whose  restaurants  closed 
and for outstanding receivables due from continuing franchisees. For restaurants that are anticipated to close or are 
exhibiting signs of financial distress, credit terms are typically restricted, weekly food orders are required to be paid 
prior  to  delivery  and  royalty  and  advertising  fees  are  collected  as  add-ons  to  the  delivered  price  of  weekly  food 
orders. 

Interest Expense 

Interest expense decreased  nominally for the fiscal  year ended June 28, 2015, compared to the prior year 
due to lower average borrowings on the Company’s credit facilities in the current year which was paid in full in the 
second quarter of fiscal 2015. 

Provision for Income Tax 

Income tax benefit for fiscal 2015 decreased $0.1 million to $0.7 million and was calculated on an effective 
income tax rate that is consistent with the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate of 34% adjusted for state income tax 
effects  and  permanent  difference  items.    The  decrease  in  tax  benefit  in  fiscal  2015  was  due  to  a  decrease  in  the 
effective tax rate to 28.6% in fiscal 2015 from 33.9% in fiscal 2014 due primarily to adjusted state tax calculations.  
Management  believes  that  future  operations  will  generate  sufficient  taxable  income,  along  with  the  reversal  of 
temporary differences, to fully realize the net deferred tax assets of $2.6 million. 

Discontinued Operations 

Discontinued  operations  include  losses  from  two  Pizza  Inn  locations  in  Texas.    One  is  a  leased  building 
associated  with  a  Company-owned  restaurant  closed  during  fiscal  2008.    The  other  is  results  of  operations  for  a 
Company-owned restaurant that was closed in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 due to declining sales. 

Sources and Uses of Funds 

Liquidity and Capital Resources 

Our  primary  sources  of  liquidity  are  cash  flows  from  operating  activities  and  proceeds  from  the  sale  of 

common stock.  

Cash  flows  from  operating  activities  are  generally  the  result  of  net  income  adjusted  for  depreciation  and 
amortization and changes in working capital.  Cash provided by operations was $2.0 million in fiscal 2015 compared 
to cash used by operations of $0.1 million in fiscal year 2014.   

The  Company  used  cash  for  investing  activities  of  approximately  $6.7  million  in  fiscal  2015  mainly  for 
new Company-owned Pie Five Units. The Company used cash for investing activities of approximately $2.0 million 
in fiscal 2014 mainly for new Company-owned Pie Five stores. 

  20 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash  flows  from  financing  activities  generally  reflect  changes  in  the  Company's  net  borrowings,  stock 
options exercised and proceeds from the sale of stock during the period. During fiscal 2015, the Company had a net 
decrease of $0.8 million in bank debt.  During fiscal 2014, the Company had a net decrease of $1.8 million in bank 
debt.    During  fiscal  2015,  the  Company  had  proceeds  from  the  sale  of  stock  of  $8.3  million  compared  to  $5.6 
million in the prior fiscal year.  During fiscal 2015, the Company had proceeds from the exercise of stock options of 
$0.4 million compared to $0.1 million in the prior fiscal year. 

On May 20, 2013, the Company entered into an At-the-Market Issuance Sales Agreement with MLV & Co. 
LLC (“MLV”) pursuant to which the Company could offer and sell shares of its common stock having an aggregate 
offering price of up to $3,000,000 from time to time through MLV, acting as agent (the “2013 ATM Offering”). The 
2013 ATM Offering was undertaken pursuant to Rule 415 and a shelf Registration Statement on Form S-3 which 
was declared effective by the SEC on May 13, 2013.  On November 20, 2013, the Company and MLV amended the 
At-the-Market Issuance Sales Agreement and the SEC declared effective a new shelf Registration Statement on 
Form S-3 to increase the 2013 ATM Offering by $5,000,000.  The Company ultimately sold an aggregate of 
1,257,609 shares in the 2013 ATM Offering, realizing aggregate net proceeds of $7.8 million.   

On  October  1,  2014,  the  Company  entered  into  a  new  At  Market  Issuance  Sales  Agreement  with  MLV 
pursuant  to  which  the  Company  could  initially  offer  and  sell  shares  of  its  common  stock  having  an  aggregate 
offering price of up to $5,000,000 from time to time through MLV, acting as agent (the “2014 ATM Offering”).  On 
February 13, 2015, the aggregate offering amount of the 2014 ATM Offering  was increased to $10,000,000.   The 
2014  ATM  Offering  is  being  undertaken  pursuant  to  Rule  415  and  a  shelf  Registration  Statement  on  Form  S-3 
which  was  declared  effective  by  the  SEC  on  August  8,  2014.  Through  June  28,  2015,  the  Company  had  sold  an 
aggregate of 767,463 shares in the 2014 ATM Offering, realizing aggregate net proceeds of $7.1 million.   

Credit Facilities  

On  August  28,  2012,  the  Company  entered  into  a  Loan  and  Security  Agreement  (the  “F&M  Loan 
Agreement”) with The F&M Bank & Trust Company (“F&M”) providing for a $2.0 million revolving credit facility 
(with a $500 thousand letter of credit subfacility), a $2.0 million fully funded term loan facility and a $6.0 million 
advancing term loan facility.  An origination fee of 0.5% of the total credit facilities was paid at closing.  At closing, 
F&M funded a $2.0 million term loan payable in 48 equal monthly installments of principal plus accrued interest at 
a  fixed  rate  of  4.574%  per  annum.    Amounts  repaid  under  this  fully  funded  term  loan  could  not  be  reborrowed.  
Initial  proceeds  from  the  F&M  Loan  Agreement  were  used  to  repay  amounts  borrowed  under  a  previous  credit 
facility that subsequently was canceled.  

On June 13, 2013 the Company entered into a First Amendment to the F&M Loan Agreement that revised 
certain financial covenants to address proceeds from the Company’s at-the-market offerings of common stock.  On 
September 10, 2013 the Company entered into a Second Amendment to the F&M Loan Agreement that specified the 
application of prepayments to the loan amortization schedule and revised certain definitions. 

The  Company  could  borrow,  repay  and  reborrow  under  the  revolving  credit  facility  through  August  28, 
2014, at which time all amounts outstanding under the revolving credit facility would mature. The Company did not 
draw borrowings on the revolving credit facility during fiscal 2015 and allowed it to expire.  An unused commitment 
fee of 0.50% per annum was payable quarterly on the average unused portion of the revolving credit facility.  

Through  August  28,  2014,  F&M  had  agreed  to  make  up  to  $6.0  million  in  additional  term  loans  to  the 
Company.        However,  no  amounts  were  outstanding  on  the  advancing  term  loan  facility  at  the  expiration  of  the 
advance period.  As of September 26, 2014, the balance on the initial term loan facility was also paid in full.  As a 
result, the F&M Loan Agreement expired by its terms. 

Liquidity 

We expect to fund continuing operations and planned capital expenditures for the next fiscal year primarily 
from cash on hand and operating cash flow, with additional potential funding from the 2014 ATM Offering and debt 
borrowings.  Based on budgeted and year-to-date cash flow information, we believe that we have sufficient liquidity 
to satisfy our cash requirements for the 2016 fiscal year.  

  21 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires the Company’s management to 
make  estimates  and  assumptions  that  affect  our  reported  amounts  of  assets,  liabilities,  revenues,  expenses  and 
related disclosure of contingent liabilities.  The  Company  bases its estimates on  historical experience and  various 
other assumptions that it believes are reasonable under the circumstances.  Estimates and assumptions are reviewed 
periodically.  Actual results could differ materially from estimates. 

The  Company  believes  the  following  critical  accounting  policies  require  estimates  about  the  effect  of 
matters that are inherently uncertain, are susceptible to change, and therefore require subjective judgments.  Changes 
in  the  estimates  and  judgments  could  significantly  impact  the  Company’s  results  of  operations  and  financial 
condition in future periods. 

Accounts receivable consist primarily of receivables  generated from food and supply  sales to franchisees 
and franchise royalties.  The Company records a provision for doubtful receivables to allow for any amounts which 
may  be  unrecoverable  based  upon  an  analysis  of  the  Company’s  prior  collection  experience,  customer 
creditworthiness and current economic trends.  Actual realization of accounts receivable could differ materially from 
the Company’s estimates. 

Prior to January 5, 2015, inventory consisted primarily of food, paper products and supplies primarily 

warehoused by the Company’s third-party distributors for distribution system-wide and was stated at lower of cost 
or market, with cost determined according to the weighted average cost method.  The valuation of such inventory 
required us to estimate the amount of obsolete and excess inventory based on estimates of future demand for our 
products within specific time horizons, generally nine months or less.  The possibility of overestimating demand 
subjected us to risk of inventory write-down which could have had a negative impact on the Company’s gross 
margin. 

Effective  in  the  third  quarter  of  fiscal  2015,  we  changed  our  distribution  arrangements  to  shift  the 
responsibility for maintaining system-wide distribution inventory from Norco to third party distributors.  As a result, 
as  of  June  28,  2015,  inventory  consisted  primarily  of  food,  paper  products  and  supplies  stored  in  and  used  by 
Company  restaurants  and  was  stated  at  lower  of  first-in,  first-out  (“FIFO”)  or  market.    The  valuation  of  such 
restaurant inventory requires us to estimate the amount of obsolete and excess inventory based on estimates of future 
retail sales by Company-owned restaurants.  Overestimating retail sales by Company-owned restaurants could result 
in the write-down of inventory which would have a negative impact on the gross margin of such Company-owned 
restaurants. 

The  Company  reviews  long-lived  assets  for  impairment  when  events  or  circumstances  indicate  that  the 
carrying  value  of  such  assets  may  not  be  fully  recoverable.  Impairment  is  evaluated  based  on  the  sum  of 
undiscounted estimated future cash flows expected to result from use of an asset compared to its carrying value. If 
impairment is recognized, the carrying value of the impaired asset is reduced to its fair value based on discounted 
estimated future cash flows.  During fiscal year 2015, the Company tested its long-lived assets for impairment and 
recognized  pre-tax,  non-cash  impairment  charges  of  $0.3  million  related  to  the  carrying  value  of  one  Company-
owned Buffet Unit in Texas.  During fiscal year 2014, the Company tested its long-lived assets for impairment and 
recognized  pre-tax,  non-cash  impairment  charges  of  $0.3  million  related  to  the  carrying  value  of  two  Company-
owned Pie Five Units in Texas.  

The Company periodically evaluates the realizability of its deferred tax assets based upon the Company’s 
analysis of existing tax credits by jurisdiction and expectations of the Company’s ability to utilize these tax assets 
through a review of estimated future taxable income and establishment of tax strategies.  These estimates could be 
materially impacted by changes in future taxable income, the results of tax strategies or changes in tax law. 

The  Company  recognizes  food  and  supply  revenue  when  products  are  delivered  and  the  customer  takes 
ownership  and  assumes  risk  of  loss,  collection  of  the  relevant  receivable  is  probable,  persuasive  evidence  of  an 
arrangement exists and the sales price is fixed or determinable.  Franchise revenue consists of income from license 
fees, royalties, and area development and foreign master license sales.  License fees are recognized as income when 
there has been substantial performance of the agreement by both the franchisee and the Company, generally at the 
time the restaurant is opened.  Royalties are recognized as income when earned. 

  22 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The  Company  accounts  for  uncertain  tax  positions  in  accordance  with  ASC  740-10,  which  prescribes  a 
comprehensive  model  for  how  a  company  should  recognize,  measure,  present,  and  disclose  in  its  financial 
statements uncertain tax positions that it has taken or expects to take on a tax return.   ASC 740-10 requires that a 
company  recognize  in  its  financial  statements  the  impact  of  tax  positions  that  meet  a  “more  likely  than  not” 
threshold, based on the technical merits of the position.  The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from 
such a  position  should be  measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than  fifty percent likelihood of 
being realized upon ultimate settlement.  As of June 28, 2015 and June 29, 2014, the Company had no uncertain tax 
positions. 

The  Company assesses its exposures to loss contingencies  from legal  matters based upon factors  such as 
the current status of the cases and consultations with external counsel and provides for the exposure by accruing an 
amount if it is judged to be probable and can be reasonably estimated. If the actual loss from a contingency differs 
from management’s estimate, operating results could be adversely impacted. 

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK. 

Not required for a smaller reporting company. 

ITEM 8.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA 

See  information  set  forth  on  Index  to  Consolidated  Financial  Statements  and  Supplementary  Data 

appearing on page F-1 of this report on Form 10-K. 

ITEM  9.  CHANGES  IN  AND  DISAGREEMENTS  WITH  ACCOUNTANTS  ON  ACCOUNTING  AND                

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE. 

None. 

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES. 

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures 

The  Company’s  management,  with  the  participation  of  the  Company’s  principal  executive  officer  and 
principal financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the 
end  of  the  period  covered  by  this  report.  Based  on  that  evaluation,  the  principal  executive  officer  and  principal 
financial  officer  concluded  that  the  Company’s  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  as  of  the  end  of  the  period 
covered by this report, were effective in assuring that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in 
reports  filed  under  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934  is  (i)  accumulated  and  communicated  to  management, 
including  the  principal  executive  officer  and  principal  financial  officer,  as  appropriate  to  allow  timely  decisions 
regarding disclosure, and (ii) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the 
SEC’s rules and forms. 

Management Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting 

The  Company’s  management  is  responsible  for  establishing  and  maintaining  adequate  “internal  control 
over  financial  reporting”  (as  defined  in  Rule  13a-15(f)  under  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934).    Under  the 
supervision  and  with  the  participation  of  management,  including  our  principal  executive  officer  and  principal 
financial officer, the Company has conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial 
reporting.  The  Company’s  management  based  it’s  evaluation  on  criteria  set  forth  in  the  framework  in  Internal 
Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.  
Based  upon  that  evaluation,  management  has  concluded  that  our  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  was 
effective as of June 28, 2015.  During the most recent fiscal quarter, there have been no changes in the Company’s 
internal controls over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, 
its internal control over financial reporting.   

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION. 

There is no information required to be disclosed under this Item. 

  23 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PART III 

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE. 

The  information required by  this Item is incorporated by reference from the  Company’s definitive proxy 
statement to be filed with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year 
covered by this report. 

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION. 

The  information required by  this Item is incorporated by reference from the  Company’s definitive proxy 
statement to be filed with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year 
covered by this report. 

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND 

RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS. 

The  information required by  this Item is incorporated by reference from the  Company’s definitive proxy 
statement to be filed with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year 
covered by this report. 

ITEM  13.  CERTAIN  RELATIONSHIPS  AND  RELATED  TRANSACTIONS  AND  DIRECTOR 

INDEPENDENCE. 

The information required by  this Item is incorporated by reference from the  Company’s definitive proxy 
statement to be filed with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year 
covered by this report. 

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES. 

The information required by  this Item is incorporated by reference from the  Company’s definitive proxy 
statement to be filed with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year 
covered by this report. 

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.  

PART IV 

(a) 1.  The financial statements filed as part of this report are listed in the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements 

and Supplementary Data appearing on page F-1 of this report on Form 10-K. 

    2.  Any financial statement schedule filed as part of this report is listed in the Index to Consolidated Financial 

Statements and Supplementary Data appearing on page F-1 of this report on Form 10-K. 

    3.  Exhibits:    

        3.1 

        3.2 

        10.1 

Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Rave Restaurant Group, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 
3.1 to Form 8-K filed January 8, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).  

Amended and Restated Bylaws of Rave Restaurant Group, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to Form 8-K 
filed January 8, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference). 

2005 Non-Employee Directors Stock Award Plan of the Company and form of Stock Option Award 
Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.25 to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 26, 2005 and 
incorporated herein by reference).* 

        10.2 

2005 Employee Incentive Stock Option Award Plan of the Company and form of Stock Option 
Award Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.26 to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 26, 2005 and 

  24 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
       
   
   
       
   
   
       
 
 
 
 
  
 
   
   
incorporated herein by reference).* 

10.3 

10.4 

        10.5 

        10.6 

10.7 

10.8 

2015 Long Term Incentive Plan of the Company (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed November 
20, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference).* 

Form of Stock Option Grant Agreement under the Company’s 2015 Long Term Incentive Plan 
(filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K filed November 20, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference).* 

Employment letter dated November 8, 2012, between the Company and Randall Gier (filed as 
Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed November 15, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference).* 

Employment letter dated April 7, 2014, between the Company and Tim Mullany (filed as Exhibit 
10.1 to Form 8-K filed April 30, 2014, and incorporated herein by reference).* 

At Market Issuance Sales Agreement between the Company and MLV & Co. LLC dated October 1, 
2014 (filed as Exhibit 1.1 to Form 8-K filed October 1, 2014, and incorporated herein by reference). 

Advisory  Services  Agreement  between  the  Company  and  NCM  Services,  Inc.  dated  February  20, 
2014  (filed  as  Exhibit  10.1  to  Form  8-K  filed  February  24,  2014,  and  incorporated  herein  by 
reference).*  

21.1 

List of Subsidiaries. 

23.1 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. 

        31.1 

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer. 

        31.2 

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer. 

        32.1 

Section 1350 Certification of Principal Executive Officer. 

        32.2 

Section 1350 Certification of Principal Financial Officer. 

101 

Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T.  

* Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

  25 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
   
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
   
 
 
       
   
   
       
   
   
       
   
   
       
   
   
       
   
  
       
 
 
SIGNATURES 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly 
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. 

Date: September 24, 2015 

Rave Restaurant Group, Inc. 
By: /s/ Randall E. Gier       

Randall E. Gier 
President and Chief Executive Officer 

By: /s/ Timothy E. Mullany 

Timothy E. Mullany 
Chief Financial Officer 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following 
persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. 

Name and Position 
/s/ Randall E. Gier       
Randall E. Gier 
President and Chief Executive Officer 
(Principal Executive Officer) 

   Date 
   September 24, 2015 

/s/Timothy E. Mullany  
Tim Mullany 
Chief Financial Officer 
(Principal  Financial  and  Accounting 
Officer) 

   September 24, 2015 

   September 24, 2015 

/s/Mark E. Schwarz 
Mark E. Schwarz 
Director and Chairman of the Board 

/s/Ramon D. Phillips 
Ramon D. Phillips 
Director and Vice Chairman of the 
Board 

/s/ Steven M. Johnson 
Steven M. Johnson 
Director 

/s/Robert B. Page 
Robert B. Page 
Director 

/s/ William C. Hammett, Jr. 
William Hammett 
Director 

/s/ Clinton J. Coleman 
Clinton J. Coleman 
Director 

   September 24, 2015 

   September 24, 2015 

   September 24, 2015 

   September 24, 2015 

   September 24, 2015 

  26 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
   
      
   
      
   
   
      
   
   
      
   
      
   
      
   
 
   
      
   
      
   
   
      
   
   
      
   
      
   
   
      
   
   
      
   
      
   
   
      
   
   
      
   
      
   
   
      
 
 
      
 
      
 
   
      
 
 
      
 
      
 
 
 
 
Exhibit 21.1 

SUBSIDIARIES OF RAVE RESTAURANT GROUP, INC. 

Name of Subsidiary 

Jurisdiction of Organization 

Pizza Inn, Inc.* 
   (d/b/a Pizza Inn) 

Pie Five Pizza Company, Inc.* 
   (d/b/a Pie Five Pizza Company or Pie Five) 

Pie Five Restaurants, Inc.* 

PIBC Holding, Inc.*   

Pizza Inn Beverage Corp.* 

Pie Five Beverage Corp.* 

Missouri 

Texas 

Texas 

Texas 

Texas 

Texas 

*   Does business under its corporate name as well as any referenced assumed name. 

  27 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Exhibit 23.1 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

Rave Restaurant Group, Inc. 
The Colony, Texas 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (Nos. 033-71700, 
333-77617, 333-76296 and 333-177436) and Forms S-3 (Nos. 333-188344, 333-191559 and 333-197507) of Rave 
Restaurant  Group,  Inc.  of  our  report  dated  September  24,  2014,  relating  to  the  consolidated  financial  statement, 
which appears in this Form 10-K.  

Montgomery Coscia Greilich LLP 
Plano, Texas 

September 24, 2015 

  28 

 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Exhibit 31.1 

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER 
Pursuant to section 3.02 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

I, Randall E. Gier, certify that: 

1. 

I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Rave Restaurant Group, Inc. (“the Registrant”);  

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state 
a  material  fact  necessary  to  make  the  statements  made,  in  light  of  the  circumstances  under  which  such 
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, 
fairly  present  in  all  material  respects  the  financial  condition,  results  of  operations  and  cash  flows  of  the 
Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  

4.  The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure 
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control 
over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Registrant and 
have:  

a.  Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or  caused  such  disclosure  controls  and 
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the 
Registrant,  including  its  consolidated  subsidiaries,  is  made  known  to  us  by  others  within  those 
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  

b.  Designed  such  internal  control  over  financial  reporting,  or  caused  such  internal  control  over 
financial  reporting  to  be  designed  under  our  supervision,  to  provide  reasonable  assurance 
regarding  the  reliability  of  financial  reporting  and  the  preparation  of  financial  statements  for 
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

c.  Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in 
this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of 
the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  

d.  Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that 
occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in 
the  case  of  an  annual  report)  that  has  materially  affected,  or  is  reasonably  likely  to  materially 
affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and  

5.  The  Registrant’s  other  certifying  officer  and  I  have  disclosed,  based  on  our  most  recent  evaluation  of 
internal  control  over  financial  reporting,  to  the  Registrant’s  auditors  and  the  audit  committee  of  the 
Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  

a.  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control 
over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to 
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  

b.  Any  fraud,  whether  or  not  material,  that  involves  management  or  other  employees  who  have  a 

significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.  

Date: September 24, 2015 

   By:   /s/ Randall E. Gier           
 Randall E. Gier 
 President and Chief Executive Officer 
 (Principal Executive Officer) 

  29 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Exhibit 31.2 

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER 
Pursuant to Section 3.02 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

I, Timothy E. Mullany, certify that: 

1. 

I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Rave Restaurant Group, Inc. (“the Registrant”); 

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state 
a  material  fact  necessary  to  make  the  statements  made,  in  light  of  the  circumstances  under  which  such 
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, 
fairly  present  in  all  material  respects  the  financial  condition,  results  of  operations  and  cash  flows  of  the 
Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  

4.  The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure 
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control 
over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Registrant and 
have:  

a.  Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or  caused  such  disclosure  controls  and 
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the 
Registrant,  including  its  consolidated  subsidiaries,  is  made  known  to  us  by  others  within  those 
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  

b.  Designed  such  internal  control  over  financial  reporting,  or  caused  such  internal  control  over 
financial  reporting  to  be  designed  under  our  supervision,  to  provide  reasonable  assurance 
regarding  the  reliability  of  financial  reporting  and  the  preparation  of  financial  statements  for 
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

c.  Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in 
this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of 
the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  

d.  Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that 
occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in 
the  case  of  an  annual  report)  that  has  materially  affected,  or  is  reasonably  likely  to  materially 
affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and  

5.  The  Registrant’s  other  certifying  officer  and  I  have  disclosed,  based  on  our  most  recent  evaluation  of 
internal  control  over  financial  reporting,  to  the  Registrant’s  auditors  and  the  audit  committee  of  the 
Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  

a.  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control 
over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to 
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  

b.  Any  fraud,  whether  or  not  material,  that  involves  management  or  other  employees  who  have  a 

significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.  

Date: September 24, 2015 

   By:   /s/ Timothy E. Mullany     

 Timothy E. Mullany 
Chief Financial Officer 
 (Principal Financial Officer) 

  30 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Exhibit 32.1 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED 
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  

The  undersigned  officer  of  Rave  Restaurant  Group,  Inc.  (the  “Company”),  does  hereby  certify,  to  such 
officer’s knowledge, that the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 28, 2015, 
and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-K”) fully complies with 
the  requirements  of  Section  13(a)  or  15(d),  as  applicable,  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934  and  the 
information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of 
operations of the Company.  

Date: September 24, 2015 

   By:  /s/  Randall E. Gier       

President and Chief Executive Officer 
(Principal Executive Officer) 

  31 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Exhibit 32.2 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED 
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  

The  undersigned  officer  of  Rave  Restaurant  Group,  Inc.  (the  “Company”),  does  hereby  certify,  to  such 
officer’s knowledge, that the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 28, 2015, 
and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-K”) fully complies with 
the  requirements  of  Section  13(a)  or  15(d),  as  applicable,  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934  and  the 
information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of 
operations of the Company. 

Date: September 24, 2015 

   By:  /s/ Timothy E. Mullany     

 Timothy E. Mullany 
 Chief Financial Officer 
 (Principal Financial Officer) 

  32 

 
 
 
 
 
 
RAVE RESTAURANT GROUP, INC. 
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA 

Description 

Page No. 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm – Montgomery Coscia Greilich LLP 

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended June 28, 2015 and June 29, 2014. 

Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 28, 2015 and June 29, 2014. 

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity for the years ended June 28, 2015 and June 
29, 2014. 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended June 28, 2015 and June 29, 2014. 

Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information for the years ended June 28, 2015 and 
June 29, 2014. 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. 

F-2 

F-3 

F-4 

F-5 

F-6 

F-6 

F-7 

F 

1 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

Board of Directors and Shareholders 
Rave Restaurant Group, Inc. 
The Colony, Texas 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Rave Restaurant Group, Inc. as of June 28, 2015 and 
June 29, 2014 and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the  fiscal 
years then ended.  These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.  Our responsibility is 
to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United 
States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the 
financial  statements  are  free  of  material  misstatement.    The  Company  is  not  required  to  have  an  audit  of  its  internal 
control over financial reporting.  Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis 
for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion 
on  the  effectiveness  of  the  Company’s  internal  control  over  financial  reporting.  Accordingly,  we  express  no  such 
opinion.    An  audit  also  includes  examining,  on  a  test  basis,  evidence  supporting  the  amounts  and  disclosures  in  the 
financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as 
evaluating  the  overall  financial  statement  presentation.    We  believe  that  our  audits  provide  a  reasonable  basis  for  our 
opinion. 

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial 
position of Rave Restaurant Group, Inc. as of June 28, 2015 and June 29, 2014, and the results of its operations and cash 
flows for the fiscal years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of 
America. 

/s/ Montgomery Coscia Greilich LLP 
Plano, Texas 
September 24, 2015 

F  2 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
F  3 

June 28,June 29,20152014REVENUES:48,199$               42,224$               COSTS AND EXPENSES:Cost of sales41,307                 36,325                 Franchise expenses3,154                    2,931                    General and administrative expenses4,792                    4,373                    Pre-opening expenses721                       161                       Impairment of long-lived assets and other lease charges300                       253                       Bad debt153                       253                       Interest expense113                       142                       50,540                 44,438                 LOSS FROM CONTINUINGOPERATIONS BEFORE TAXES(2,341)                  (2,214)                  Income tax benefit(670)                     (760)                     LOSS FROMCONTINUING OPERATIONS(1,671)                  (1,454)                  Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes(168)                     (113)                     NET LOSS(1,839)$                (1,567)$                LOSS PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK - BASIC:Loss from continuing operations(0.17)$                  (0.17)$                  Loss from discontinued operations(0.02)$                  (0.01)$                  Net loss(0.19)$                  (0.18)$                  LOSS PER SHARE OF COMMONSTOCK - DILUTED:Loss from continuing operations(0.16)$                  (0.16)$                  Loss from discontinued operations(0.02)$                  (0.01)$                  Net loss(0.18)$                  (0.17)$                  Weighted average commonshares outstanding - basic9,7448,635Weighted average commonshares outstanding - diluted10,3069,173See accompanying Report of Independent Registered PublicAccounting Firm and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.RAVE RESTAURANT GROUP, INCCONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS(In thousands, except per share amounts)Fiscal Year Ended 
F  4 

RAVE RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS(In thousands, except share amounts)June 28,June 29,ASSETS20152014CURRENT ASSETSCash and cash equivalents$5,958            $2,796            Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtfulaccounts of $193 and $276, respectively3,437            3,276            Notes receivable24                  81                  Inventories180               1,703            Income tax receivable492               386               Deferred income tax assets729               951               Prepaid expenses and other872               173               Total current assets11,692          9,366            LONG-TERM ASSETSProperty, plant and equipment, net10,020          5,133            Long-term notes receivable119               134               Long-term deferred tax asset1,864            939               Deposits and other276               396               Total assets$23,971          $15,968          LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITYCURRENT LIABILITIESAccounts payable - trade$2,875            $2,023            Accrued expenses1,267            926               Deferred rent155               163               Deferred revenues374               177               Bank debt-                     500               Total current liabilities4,671            3,789            LONG-TERM LIABILITIESBank debt, net of current portion-                     267               Deferred rent, net of current portion893               822               Deferred revenues, net of current portion1,166            791               Deferred gain on sale of property9                    34                  Other long-term liabilities22                  23                  Total liabilities6,761            5,726            COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (See Notes F and J)SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITYCommon stock, $.01 par value; authorized 26,000,000shares; issued 17,374,735 and 16,240,412 shares, respectively;outstanding 10,255,335 and 9,121,012 shares, respectively174               162               Additional paid-in capital24,700          15,905          Retained earnings16,972          18,811          Treasury stock at cost7,119,400 shares(24,636)        (24,636)        Total shareholders' equity 17,210          10,242          Total liabilities and shareholders' equity $23,971          $15,968          See accompanying Report of Independent Registered PublicAccounting Firm and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F 5 Paid-inRetainedSharesAmountCapitalEarningsSharesAmountTotal BALANCE, JUNE 30, 20138,193 153$ 10,174$ 20,378$ (7,119) (24,636)$ 6,069$ Stock compensation expense- - 68 - - - 68 Stock options exercised39 - 82 - - - 82 Sale of Stock889 9 5,581 - - - 5,590 Net loss- - - (1,567) - - (1,567) BALANCE, JUNE 29, 20149,121 162$ 15,905$ 18,811$ (7,119) (24,636)$ 10,242$ Stock compensation expense- - 128 - - - 128 Stock options exercised170 2 424 - - - 426 Sale of stock964 10 8,243 - - - 8,253 Net loss- - - (1,839) - - (1,839) BALANCE, JUNE 28, 201510,255 174$ 24,700$ 16,972$ (7,119) (24,636)$ 17,210$ Accounting Firm and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.Common StockAdditional
RAVE RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY(In thousands)See accompanying Report of Independent Registered PublicTreasury Stock F 6 June 28,June 29,20152014CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:Net loss(1,839)$ (1,567)$ Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash provided by (used in) operating activities:Impairment of fixed assets and other assets300 253 Depreciation and amortization1,617 1,454 (Gain) loss on the sale of assets49 (97) Provision for bad debt153 48 Stock compensation expense128 68 Deferred income taxes(703) (840) Changes in operating assets and liabilities:Notes and accounts receivable(240) (70) Income tax receivable(107) (41) Inventories1,523 (88) Prepaid expenses and other(705) (213) Deferred revenue545 404 Accounts payable - trade852 451 Accrued expenses404 163 Cash provided by (used for) operating activities1,977 (75) CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:Proceeds from sale of assets- 106 Capital expenditures(6,727) (2,068) Cash used for investing activities(6,727) (1,962) CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:Borrowings of bank debt- - Repayments of bank debt(767) (1,758) Proceeds from sale of stock8,253 5,590 Proceeds from exercise of stock options426 82 Cash provided by financing activities7,912 3,914 Net increase in cash and cash equivalents3,162 1,877 Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year2,796 919 Cash and cash equivalents, end of year5,958$ 2,796$ CASH PAID FOR:Interest113$ 142$ Income taxes19$ 17$ Accounting Firm and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.Fiscal Year EndedRAVE RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS(In thousands)See accompanying Report of Independent Registered PublicSUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION RAVE RESTAURANT GROUP, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOTE A - ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES: Description of Business: Rave Restaurant Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively referred to as the “Company”, or in the first person notations of “we”, “us” and “our”) operate and franchise pizza buffet, delivery/carry-out and express restaurants domestically and internationally under the trademark “Pizza Inn” and operate and franchise domestic fast casual restaurants under the trademarks “Pie Five Pizza Company” or “Pie Five”. We provide or facilitate the procurement and distribution of food, equipment and supplies to our domestic and international system of restaurants through our Norco Restaurant Services Company (“Norco”) division and through agreements with third party distributors. As of June 28, 2015, we owned and operated 26 restaurants comprised of 24 Pie Five restaurants (“Pie Five Units”) and two Pizza Inn buffet restaurants (“Buffet Units”). As of that date, we also had 30 franchised Pie Five Units and 248 franchised Pizza Inn restaurants. The 177 domestic franchised Pizza Inn restaurants were comprised of 99 Buffet Units, 21 delivery/carry-out restaurants (“Delco Units”) and 57 express restaurants (“Express Units”). The 71 international franchised Pizza Inn restaurants were comprised of 18 Buffet Units, 45 Delco Units and eight Express Units. Domestic restaurants were located predominantly in the southern half of the United States, with Texas, North Carolina, Arkansas and Tennessee accounting for approximately 29%, 12%, 11% and 8%, respectively, of the total number of domestic restaurants. Principles of Consolidation: The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Rave Restaurant Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries, all of which are wholly owned. All appropriate inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated. Reclassifications: Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period amounts to conform to the current period presentation. Cash and Cash Equivalents: The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Concentration of Credit Risk: Financial instruments, which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk, consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents. At June 28, 2015 and June 29, 2014 and at various times during the fiscal years then ended, cash and cash equivalents were in excess of Federal Depository Insurance Corporation insured limits. We do not believe we are exposed to any significant credit risk on cash and cash equivalents. Inventories: Inventory consists primarily of food, paper products and supplies stored in and used by Company restaurants and was stated at lower of first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) or market. The valuation of such restaurant inventory requires us to estimate the amount of obsolete and excess inventory based on estimates of future retail sales by Company-owned restaurants. Overestimating retail sales by Company-owned restaurants could result in the write-down of inventory which would have a negative impact on the gross margin of such Company-owned restaurants. F 7 Closed Restaurants and Discontinued Operations: In April, 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-08, Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity, which modifies the definition of discontinued operations to include only disposals of an entity that represent strategic shifts that have or will have a major effect on an entity’s operation and requires entities to disclose information about disposals of individually significant components that do not meet the definition of discontinued operations. The standard is effective prospectively for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2014, with early adoption permitted. This pronouncement did not have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements The authoritative guidance on “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” requires that discontinued operations that meet certain criteria be reflected in the statement of operations after results of continuing operations as a net amount. This guidance also requires that the operations of closed restaurants, including any impairment charges, be reclassified to discontinued operations for all periods presented. The authoritative guidance on “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities,” requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred. This authoritative guidance also establishes that fair value is the objective for initial measurement of the liability. Discontinued operations include losses from two Pizza Inn locations in Texas. One is a leased building associated with a Company-owned restaurant closed during fiscal 2008. The other is results of operations for a Company-owned restaurant that was closed in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 due to declining sales. Property, Plant and Equipment: Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Repairs and maintenance are charged to operations as incurred while major renewals and betterments are capitalized. Upon the sale or disposition of a fixed asset, the asset and the related accumulated depreciation or amortization are removed from the accounts and the gain or loss is included in operations. The Company capitalizes interest on borrowings during the active construction period of major capital projects. Capitalized interest is added to the cost of the underlying asset and amortized over the estimated useful life of the asset. Depreciation and amortization are computed on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets or, in the case of leasehold improvements, over the term of the lease including any reasonably assured renewal periods, if shorter. The useful lives of the assets range from three to ten years. Impairment of Long-Lived Asset and other Lease Charges: The Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment when events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be fully recoverable. Impairment is evaluated based on the sum of undiscounted estimated future cash flows expected to result from use of an asset compared to its carrying value. If impairment is recognized, the carrying value of the impaired asset is reduced to its fair value, based on discounted estimated future cash flows. During fiscal year 2015 and 2014, the Company tested its long-lived assets for impairment and recognized pre-tax, non-cash impairment charges of $0.3 million each year related to the carrying value of one Company-owned Buffet Unit in Texas and two Company-owned Pie Five Units in Texas. Accounts Receivable: Accounts receivable consist primarily of receivables from food and supply sales and franchise royalties. The Company records a provision for doubtful receivables to allow for any amounts that may be unrecoverable based upon an analysis of the Company's prior collection experience, customer creditworthiness and current economic trends. After all attempts to collect a receivable have failed, the receivable is written off against the allowance. Finance charges may be accrued at a rate of 18% per year, or up to the maximum amount allowed by law, on past due receivables. The interest income recorded from finance charges is immaterial. F 8 Notes Receivable: Notes receivable primarily consist of accounts receivable from franchisees converted into notes. The majority of amounts and terms are contained under formal promissory and personal guarantee agreements. All notes allow for early payment without penalty. Fixed principle and interest payments are due weekly or monthly. Interest income is recognized monthly. Notes receivable mature at various dates through 2024 and bear interest at rates that range from 5% to 7% (6% average rate at June 28, 2015). Management evaluates the creditworthiness of franchisees by considering credit history and sales to evaluate credit risk. Management determines interest rates based on credit risk of the underlining franchisee. The Company monitors payment history to determine whether or not a loan should be placed on a nonaccrual status or impaired. The Company charges off notes receivable based on an account-by-account analysis of the borrower’s current economic conditions, monthly payments history and historical loss experience. The allowance for doubtful notes receivable is included with the allowance for doubtful accounts. Notes receivable as of June 28, 2015 totaled $143,000, of which $24,000 was included in current assets and $119,000 was included in long-term assets in the accompanying balance sheet. The principal balance outstanding on the notes receivable and expected principal collections for the next five years and thereafter were as follows as of June 28, 2015 (in thousands): Two notes totaling $48,813 were charged off for the fiscal year ended June 28, 2015. Income Taxes: Income taxes are accounted for using the asset and liability method pursuant to the authoritative guidance on Accounting for Income Taxes. Deferred taxes are recognized for the tax consequences of "temporary differences" by applying enacted statutory tax rates applicable to future years to differences between the financial statement and carrying amounts and the tax bases of existing assets and liabilities. The effect on deferred taxes for a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. The Company recognizes future tax benefits to the extent that realization of such benefits is more likely than not. Management evaluates the deferred tax asset at the end of each fiscal quarter to determine if an allowance against the deferred tax asset is required, and at the end of fiscal years 2015 and 2014 determined that it was more likely than not that the deferred tax asset would be fully realized based on the expectation of future taxable income and the future reversal of temporary differences. Therefore, no allowance was recorded. This determination and future estimates could be impacted by changes in future taxable income, the results of tax strategies or changes in tax laws. The Company follows authoritative guidance that prescribes a comprehensive model for how a company should recognize, measure, present, and disclose in its financial statements uncertain tax positions that it has taken or expects to take on a tax return. This authoritative guidance requires that a company recognize in its financial statements the impact of tax positions that meet a “more likely than not” threshold, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. As of June 28, 2015 and June 29, 2014, the Company had no uncertain tax positions. Federal returns for tax years 2011 through 2014 remained open for examination as of June 28, 2015. F 9 NotesReceivable201621201792018122019152020 and thereafter86143$ Pre-Opening Expense: The Company's pre-opening costs are expensed as incurred and generally include payroll and other direct costs associated with training new managers and employees prior to opening a new restaurant, rent and other unit operating expenses incurred prior to opening, and promotional costs associated with the opening. Related Party Transactions: On February 20, 2014, the Company entered into an Advisory Services Agreement (the “Agreement”) with NCM Services, Inc. (“NCMS”) pursuant to which NCMS provides certain advisory and consulting services to the Company. NCMS is indirectly owned and controlled by Mark E. Schwarz, the Chairman of the Company. The term of the Agreement commenced December 30, 2013, and continues quarterly thereafter until terminated by either party. Pursuant to the Agreement, NCMS was paid an initial fee of $150,000 and earns quarterly fees of $50,000 and an additional fee of up to $50,000 per quarter (not to exceed an aggregate of $100,000 in additional fees). The quarterly and additional fees are waived if the Company is not in compliance with all financial covenants under its primary credit facility or to the extent that payment of those fees would result in non-compliance with such financial covenants. As of June 28, 2015, the accrued liability relating to services performed by NCMS was $133,336. Revenue Recognition: The Company recognizes food and supply revenue when products are delivered and the customer takes ownership and assumes risk of loss, collection of the relevant receivable is probable, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists and the sales price is fixed or determinable. The Company's Norco division sells food and supplies to franchisees on trade accounts under terms common in the industry. Shipping and handling costs billed to customers are recognized as revenue and the associated costs are included in cost of sales. Franchise revenue consists of income from license fees, royalties, and area development and foreign master license sales. License fees are recognized as income when there has been substantial performance of the agreement by both the franchisee and the Company, generally at the time the restaurant is opened. Royalties are recognized as income when earned. For the fiscal years ended June 28, 2015 and June 29, 2014, 82% and 91%, respectively, of franchise revenue was comprised of recurring royalties. We recognize restaurant sales when food and beverage products are sold. The Company reports revenue net of sales and use taxes collected from customers and remitted to governmental taxing authorities. Stock Options: We account for stock options using the fair value recognition provisions of the authoritative guidance on Share- Based Payments. The Company uses the Black-Scholes formula to estimate the value of stock-based compensation for options granted to employees and directors and expects to continue to use this acceptable option valuation model in the future. The authoritative guidance also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost to be reported as a financing cash flow. The Company’s stock-based compensation plans are described more fully in Note H. Stock options under these plans are granted at exercise prices equal to the fair market value of the Company’s stock at the dates of grant. Generally those options vest ratably over various vesting periods. Fair Value of Financial Instruments: The carrying amounts of accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments. The Company had no bank debt at June 28, 2015. Advertising and Marketing Costs: Advertising and marketing costs are expensed as incurred and totaled $0.7 million for both fiscal years ended June 28, 2015, and June 29, 2014. Advertising and marketing costs are included in cost of sales and general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations. F 10 Contingencies: Provisions for legal settlements are accrued when payment is considered probable and the amount of loss is reasonably estimable in accordance with the authoritative guidance on Accounting for Contingencies. If the best estimate of cost can only be identified within a range and no specific amount within that range can be determined more likely than any other amount within the range, and the loss is considered probable, the minimum of the range is accrued. Legal and related professional services costs to defend litigation are expensed as incurred. Use of Management Estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires the Company’s management to make estimates and assumptions that affect its reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and related disclosure of contingent liabilities. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and other various assumptions that it believes are reasonable under the circumstances. Estimates and assumptions are reviewed periodically. Actual results could differ materially from estimates. Fiscal Year: The Company's fiscal year ends on the last Sunday in June. The fiscal year ended June 28, 2015 and the fiscal year ended June 29, 2014 both contained 52 weeks. NOTE B – PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT: Property, and plant and equipment consist of the following (in thousands): Depreciation and amortization expense was approximately $1.6 million and $1.5 million for the fiscal years ended June 28, 2015 and June 29, 2014, respectively. NOTE C - ACCRUED EXPENSES: Accrued expenses consist of the following (in thousands): F 11 Estimated UsefulJune 28,June 29,Lives20152014Equipment, furniture and fixtures3 - 7 yrs$6,927 $4,864 Software5 yrs637 424 Vehicle2 - 3 yrs19 19 Leasehold improvements 10 yrs or lease term, if shorter9,134 4,820 16,717 10,127 Less: accumulated depreciation/amortization(6,697) (4,994) $10,020 $5,133 June 28,June 29,20152014Compensation$587 $455 Other506 244 Professional fees79 132 Insurance loss reserves95 95 $1,267 $926
NOTE D - LONG-TERM DEBT: On August 28, 2012, the Company entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (the “F&M Loan Agreement”) with The F&M Bank & Trust Company (“F&M”) providing for a $2.0 million revolving credit facility (with a $500 thousand letter of credit subfacility), a $2.0 million fully funded term loan facility and a $6.0 million advancing term loan facility. An origination fee of 0.5% of the total credit facilities was paid at closing. At closing, F&M funded a $2.0 million term loan payable in 48 equal monthly installments of principal plus accrued interest at a fixed rate of 4.574% per annum. Amounts repaid under this fully funded term loan could not be reborrowed. Initial proceeds from the F&M Loan Agreement were used to repay amounts borrowed under a previous credit facility that subsequently was canceled. On June 13, 2013 the Company entered into a First Amendment to the F&M Loan Agreement that revised certain financial covenants to address proceeds from the Company’s at-the-market offerings of common stock. On September 10, 2013 the Company entered into a Second Amendment to the F&M Loan Agreement that specified the application of prepayments to the loan amortization schedule and revised certain definitions. The Company could borrow, repay and reborrow under the revolving credit facility through August 28, 2014, at which time all amounts outstanding under the revolving credit facility would mature. The Company did not draw borrowings on the revolving credit facility during fiscal 2015 and allowed it to expire. An unused commitment fee of 0.50% per annum was payable quarterly on the average unused portion of the revolving credit facility. Through August 28, 2014, F&M had agreed to make up to $6.0 million in additional term loans to the Company. However, no amounts were outstanding on the advancing term loan facility at the expiration of the advance period. As of September 26, 2014, the balance on the initial term loan facility was also paid in full. As a result, the F&M Loan Agreement expired by its terms. Management believes the cash on hand combined with cash from operations and proceeds from the 2014 ATM Offering will be sufficient to fund operations for the next 12 months. NOTE E - INCOME TAXES: Provision for income taxes from continuing operations consists of the following (in thousands): Included in loss from discontinued operations is $86,000 and $59,000 of tax benefit for the fiscal years ended June 28, 2015 and June 29, 2014, respectively. The effective income tax rate varied from the statutory rate for the fiscal years ended June 28, 2015 and June 29, 2014 as reflected below (in thousands): F 12 June 28,June 29,20152014Current - Federal$- $- Current - Foreign24 - Current - State29 18 Deferred - Federal(674) (722) Deferred - State(49) (56) Provision for income taxes$(670) $(760) Fiscal Year Ended The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to the net deferred tax assets consisted of the following (in thousands): At the end of fiscal 2015, the Company had federal and state net operating loss carryforwards of $5.1 million and $1.8 million that are available to reduce future taxable income and will begin to expire in 2033. Of these amounts, approximately $0.6 million is related to excess stock compensation that will be recorded as additional paid-in capital when realized as a reduction in taxes payable. These net operating loss carryforwards result in a deferred tax asset of $1.6 million and $0.7 million at June 28, 2015, and June 29, 2014, respectively. Management believes that future operations will generate sufficient taxable income, along with the reversal of temporary differences, to fully realize the net deferred tax asset. NOTE F - LEASES: Premises occupied by Company-owned restaurants are leased for initial terms of five to ten years, and each has multiple renewal terms. Certain lease agreements contain either a provision requiring additional rent if sales exceed specified amounts or an escalation clause based upon a predetermined multiple. In fiscal 2007, the Company sold its corporate office building and distribution facility located at 3551 Plano Parkway, The Colony, Texas, and entered into a ten-year lease agreement for the corporate office building. F 13 June 28,June 29,20152014Federal income taxes based on 34%of pre-tax income$(796) $(763) State income tax, net of federal effect(13) (52) Permanent adjustments44 8 Foreign tax credits24 - Other71 47 $(670) $(760)
June 28,June 29,20152014CurrentReserve for bad debt$69 $98 Deferred fees124 54 Other reserves and accruals536 798 729 950 Non CurrentCredit carryforwards180 181 Net operating loss carryforwards1,633 734 Depreciable assets51 24 Total gross deferred tax asset2,593 1,889 Valuation allowance- - Net deferred tax asset$2,593 $1,889 Future minimum rental payments under non-cancelable leases, net of subleases, with initial or remaining terms of one year or more at June 28, 2015 were as follows (in thousands): Rental expense consisted of the following (in thousands): NOTE G - EMPLOYEE BENEFITS: The Company has a tax advantaged savings plan that is designed to meet the requirements of Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”). The current plan is a modified continuation of a similar savings plan established by the Company in 1985. Employees who have completed six months of service and are at least 21 years of age are eligible to participate in the plan. The plan provides that participating employees may elect to have between 1% and 15% of their compensation deferred and contributed to the plan subject to certain IRS limitations. Effective June 27, 2005, the Company contributes on behalf of each participating employee an amount equal to 50% of the employee’s contributions up to 4% of compensation. Separate accounts are maintained with respect to contributions made on behalf of each participating employee. Employer matching contributions and earnings thereon are invested in the same investments as each participant’s employee deferral. The plan is subject to the provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, as amended, and is a profit sharing plan as defined in Section 401(k) of the Code. For the fiscal years ended June 28, 2015 and June 29, 2014, total matching contributions to the tax advantaged savings plan by the Company on behalf of participating employees were approximately $39,000 and $12,000, respectively. NOTE H - STOCK OPTIONS: In June 2005, the 2005 Employee Incentive Stock Option Award Plan (the “2005 Employee Plan”) was approved by the Company’s shareholders with a plan effective date of June 23, 2005. Under the 2005 Employee Plan, officers and employees of the Company were eligible to receive options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock. Options were granted at market value of the stock on the date of grant, were subject to various vesting and exercise periods as determined by the Compensation Committee of the board of directors, and could be designated as non-qualified or incentive stock options. A total of 1,000,000 shares of common stock were authorized for issuance under the 2005 Employee Plan. During the 2015 fiscal year, options to purchase 92,000 shares were granted under the 2005 Employee Plan. Also during the 2015 fiscal year, 3,000 shares of common stock were issued upon the exercise of options granted under the 2005 Employee Plan. The 2005 Employee Plan expired by its terms on June 23, 2015. The shareholders also approved the 2005 Non-Employee Directors Stock Award Plan (the “2005 Directors Plan”) in June 2005, to be effective as of June 23, 2005. Directors not employed by the Company were eligible to receive stock options under the 2005 Directors Plan. Options for common stock equal to twice the number of shares of F 14 OperatingLeases2016$2,41420172,07720181,75720191,70920201,660Thereafter5,946$15,563
June 28,June 29,20152014Minimum rentals$1,666 $1,448 Sublease rentals(221) (182) $1,445 $1,266 Fiscal Year Ended common stock acquired during the previous fiscal year, up to 40,000 shares per year, were automatically granted to each non-employee director on the first day of each fiscal year. Options were granted at market value of the stock on the first day of each fiscal year, with vesting periods beginning at a minimum of six months and with exercise periods up to ten years. A total of 650,000 shares of Company common stock were authorized for issuance pursuant to the 2005 Directors Plan. During the 2015 fiscal year, 28,800 options were granted under the 2005 Directors Plan. Also during the 2015 fiscal year, 167,200 shares of common stock were issued upon the exercise of options granted under the 2005 Directors Plan. The 2005 Directors Plan expired by its terms on June 23, 2015. The 2015 Long Term Incentive Plan (the “2015 LTIP”) was approved by the Company’s shareholders on November 18, 2014, and became effective June 1, 2015. Officers, employees and non-employee directors of the Company are eligible to receive awards under the 2015 LTIP. A total of 1,200,000 shares of common stock are authorized for issuance under the 2015 LTIP. Awards authorized under the 2015 LTIP include incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, restricted shares, restricted stock units and rights (either with or without accompanying options). The 2015 LTIP provides for options to be granted at market value of the stock on the date of grant and have exercise periods determined by the Compensation Committee of the board of directors. The Compensation Committee may also determine the vesting periods, performance criteria and other terms and conditions of all awards under the 2015 LTIP. As of June 28, 2015, no awards had been granted under the 2015 LTIP. A summary of stock option transactions under all of the Company’s stock option plans and information about fixed-price stock options is as follows: At June 28, 2015, the total intrinsic value of options outstanding was $8.6 million and of options exercisable was $4.3 million. The following table provides information on options outstanding and options exercisable as of June 28, 2015: F 15 Weighted-Weighted-AverageAverageExerciseExerciseSharesPriceSharesPriceOutstanding at beginningof year921,198 2.92$ 851,306 2.54$ Granted120,800 6.57$ 147,892 4.92$ Exercised(170,200) 2.50$ (39,144) 2.12$ Forfeited/Canceled/Expired- -$ (38,856) 3.15$ Outstanding at end of year871,798 3.51$ 921,198 2.92$ Exercisable at end of year406,378 2.63$ 473,659 2.43$ Weighted-average fair value ofoptions granted during the year3.16$ 3.64$ Total intrinsic value of options exercised425,944$ 82,845$ June 28, 2015 June 29, 2014Fiscal Year Ended We determine fair value following the authoritative guidance as follows: Valuation and Amortization Method. We estimate the fair value of share-based awards granted using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. We amortize the fair value of all awards on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods, which are generally the vesting periods. Expected Life. The expected life of awards granted represents the period of time that they are expected to be outstanding. Unless a life is specifically stated, we determine the expected life using the “simplified method” in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 110 since we do not have sufficient historical share option exercise experience. Expected Volatility. Using the Black-Scholes option valuation model, we estimate the volatility of our common stock at the date of grant based on the historical volatility of our common stock. Risk-Free Interest Rate. We base the risk-free interest rate used in the Black-Scholes option valuation model on the implied yield currently available on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with an equivalent remaining term equal to the expected life of the award. Expected Dividend Yield. We have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock in the last ten years and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Consequently, we use an expected dividend yield of zero in the Black-Scholes option valuation model. Expected Forfeitures. We use historical data to estimate pre-vesting option forfeitures. We record stock-based compensation only for those awards that are expected to vest. The following weighted average assumptions were used for options granted in the last two fiscal years: The share based compensation expense is included in general and administrative expense in the statement of operations. F 16 Weighted-AverageOptionsRemainingWeighted-OptionsWeighted-Range ofOutstandingContractualAverageExercisableAverageExercise Pricesat June 28, 2015Life (Years)Exercise Priceat June 28, 2015Exercise Price$1.55 - 1.9581,3064.1$1.9081,306$1.90$1.96 - 2.3590,0003.0$2.3290,000$2.32$2.36 - 2.75397,0007.2$2.57145,000$2.60$2.76 - 3.3055,0007.0$3.1155,000$3.11$3.31 - 3.8141,5287.5$3.8112,458$1.52$5.51 - 5.748,6648.0$5.748,664$5.74$5.95 - 6.25153,3008.9$6.0612,450$6.02$6.26 - 8.1645,0008.9$8.091,500$8.16871,7986.9$3.51406,378$2.63Options OutstandingOptions ExercisableJune 28,June 29,Fiscal Year Ended20152014Expected life (in years)5.9 6.0 Expected volatility39.1%42.8%Risk-free interest rate1.9%1.5%Expected forfeiture rate47.1%58.2% At June 28, 2015, the Company had unvested options to purchase 465,420 shares with a weighted average grant date fair value of $2.66. The total remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested awards amounted to approximately $0.4 million at June 28, 2015. The weighted average remaining requisite service period of the unvested awards was 15.1 months. Stock compensation expense of $0.1 million was recognized in each of fiscal years 2015 and 2014. NOTE I - SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY: On April 22, 2009, the board of directors of the Company amended the stock repurchase plan first authorized on May 23, 2007, and previously amended on June 2, 2008, by increasing the aggregate number of shares of common stock the Company may repurchase under the plan to a total of 3,016,000 shares. No shares were repurchased during fiscal 2015 and, as of June 28, 2015, there were 848,425 shares available to repurchase under the plan. On May 20, 2013, the Company entered into an At-the-Market Issuance Sales Agreement with MLV & Co. LLC (“MLV”) pursuant to which the Company could offer and sell shares of its common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $3,000,000 from time to time through MLV, acting as agent (the “2013 ATM Offering”). The 2013 ATM Offering was undertaken pursuant to Rule 415 and a shelf Registration Statement on Form S-3 which was declared effective by the SEC on May 13, 2013. On November 20, 2013, the Company and MLV amended the At-the- Market Issuance Sales Agreement and the SEC declared effective a new shelf Registration Statement on Form S-3 to increase the 2013 ATM Offering by $5,000,000. The Company ultimately sold an aggregate of 1,257,609 shares in the 2013 ATM Offering, realizing aggregate net proceeds of $7.8 million. On October 1, 2014, the Company entered into a new At Market Issuance Sales Agreement with MLV pursuant to which the Company could initially offer and sell shares of its common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $5,000,000 from time to time through MLV, acting as agent (the “2014 ATM Offering”). On February 13, 2015, the aggregate offering amount of the 2014 ATM Offering was increased to $10,000,000. The 2014 ATM Offering is being undertaken pursuant to Rule 415 and a shelf Registration Statement on Form S-3 which was declared effective by the SEC on August 8, 2014. Through June 28, 2015, the Company had sold an aggregate of 767,463 shares in the 2014 ATM Offering, realizing aggregate net proceeds of $7.1 million. The Company pays to MLV a fee equal to 3% of the gross sales price in addition to reimbursing certain costs. Expenses associated with the 2013 ATM Offering and 2014 ATM Offering were $42,000 and $43,000 in fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014, respectively, which includes fees and expense reimbursement to MLV and legal and other offering expenses incurred by the Company. NOTE J - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES: The Company is subject to various claims and contingencies related to employment agreements, franchise disputes, lawsuits, taxes, food product purchase contracts and other matters arising out of the normal course of business. Management believes that any such claims and actions currently pending are either covered by insurance or would not have a material adverse effect on the Company's annual results of operations or financial condition if decided in a manner that is unfavorable to us. NOTE K - EARNINGS PER SHARE: The Company computes and presents earnings per share (“EPS”) in accordance with the authoritative guidance on Earnings Per Share. Basic EPS excludes the effect of potentially dilutive securities while diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that would occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised, converted or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the earnings of the entity. The following table shows the reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of the basic EPS calculation to the numerator and denominator of the diluted EPS calculation (in thousands, except per share amounts). F 17 NOTE L– SEGMENT REPORTING: The Company has two reportable operating segments as determined by management using the “management approach” as defined by the authoritative guidance on Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information: (1) Franchising and Food and Supply Distribution, and (2) Company-owned Restaurants. These segments are a result of differences in the nature of the products and services sold. Corporate administration costs, which include, but are not limited to, general accounting, human resources, legal and credit and collections, are partially allocated to the two operating segments. Other revenue consists of nonrecurring items. The Franchising and Food and Supply Distribution segment establishes franchisees and franchise territorial rights and sells and distributes proprietary and non-proprietary food and other items to franchisees. Revenue for this segment is derived from the sale of distributed products and franchise royalties, franchise fees and sale of area development and foreign master license rights. Assets for this segment include equipment, furniture and fixtures. The Company-owned Restaurant segment includes sales and operating results for all Company-owned restaurants. Assets for this segment include equipment, furniture and fixtures for the Company-owned restaurants. Corporate administration and other assets primarily include the deferred tax asset, cash and short-term investments, as well as furniture and fixtures located at the corporate office and trademarks and other intangible assets. All assets are located within the United States. Summarized in the following tables are net sales and operating revenues, depreciation and amortization expense, income from continuing operations before taxes, capital expenditures and assets for the Company's reportable segments as of and for the fiscal years ended June 28, 2015 and June 29, 2014 (in thousands): F 18 June 28,June 29,20152014Loss from continuing operations(1,671)$ (1,454)$ Discontinued operations(168) (113) Net loss available to common stockholders(1,839)$ (1,567)$ BASIC:Weighted average common shares9,7448,635Loss from continuing operations per common share(0.17)$ (0.17)$ Discontinued operations per common share(0.02) (0.01) Net loss per common share(0.19)$ (0.18)$ DILUTED:Weighted average common shares9,7448,635Stock options562538Weighted average common shares outstanding10,3069,173Loss from continuing operations per common share(0.16)$ (0.16)$ Discontinued operations per common share(0.02) (0.01) Net loss per common share(0.18)$ (0.17)$ Fiscal Year Ended The following table provides information on our foreign and domestic revenues: F 19 June 28,June 29,20152014Net sales and operating revenues:Franchising and food and supply distribution35,330$ 32,253$ Company-owned restaurants (1)12,869 9,971 Consolidated revenues48,199$ 42,224$ Depreciation and amortization:Franchising and food and supply distribution24$ 19$ Company-owned restaurants (1)1,374 1,244 Combined1,398 1,263 Corporate administration and other219 191 Depreciation and amortization1,617$ 1,454$ Loss from continuing operations before taxesFranchising and food and supply distribution (2)1,492$ 762$ Company-owned restaurants (1) (2)(1,429) (1,212) Combined63 (450) Impairment of long-lived assets and other lease charges(300) (253) Corporate administration and other (2)(2,104) (1,511) Loss from continuing operations before taxes(2,341)$ (2,214)$ Capital Expenditures:Franchising and food and supply distribution-$ -$ Company-owned restaurants6,443 1,918 Corporate administration284 150 Combined capital expenditures6,727$ 2,068$ Assets:Franchising and food and supply distribution4,314$ 5,231$ Company-owned restaurants11,088 4,631 Corporate administration8,569 6,106 Combined assets23,971$ 15,968$ (1)Company stores that were closed are included in discontinued operations in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations.(2)Portions of corporate administration and other have been allocated to segments.Fiscal Year Ended
Geographic information (revenues):United States47,509$ 41,342$ Foreign countries690 882 Consolidated total48,199$ 42,224$ CORPORATE INFORMATION OFFICERS Randall E. Gier President/Chief Executive Officer Timothy E. Mullany Chief Financial Officer/Secretary DIRECTORS Mark E. Schwarz Chairman of the Board Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Newcastle Capital Management, L.P. Ramon D. Phillips Former Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Hallmark Financial Services, Inc. Robert B. Page Independent Restaurant Consultant Former Chief Executive Officer of Backyard Burgers, Inc. William C. Hammett, Jr. Former Chief Executive Officer of iH3, LLC Clinton J. Coleman Managing Director of Newcastle Capital Management, L.P. Steven M. Johnson Jimmy John’s Franchisee and Former Chief Executive Officer of F&H Acquisition Corp CORPORATE OFFICE RAVE Restaurant Group, Inc. 3551 Plano Parkway The Colony, TX 75056 (469) 384-5000 Internet: http://www.raverg.com NORCO DISTRIBUTION CENTER Norco Restaurant Services Company 3551 Plano Parkway The Colony, TX 75056 (469) 384-5050 STOCK EXCHANGE AND TRADING SYMBOL RAVE Restaurant Group, Inc. common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Market System under the symbol “RAVE”. STOCK TRANSFER AGENT Securities Transfer Corporation 2591 Dallas Parkway, Suite 102 Frisco, TX 75034 INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM Montgomery, Coscia and Greilich, LLP Plano, TX OUTSIDE LEGAL COUNSEL McGuire, Craddock & Strother, P.C. Dallas, TX LOCATIONS DOMESTIC Alabama Georgia Kentucky Missouri Oklahoma Tennessee Illinois Nebraska Kansas Florida Mississippi North Carolina Arkansas Maryland Louisiana New Mexico South Carolina South Dakota Texas Indiana Utah Virginia Michigan Washington DC INTERNATIONAL Bahrain Bangladesh Honduras Kuwait Oman Saudi Arabia United Arab Emirates INVESTOR INFORMATION For further information about the company’s common stock, please write to the Investor Relations Department at the company’s corporate office. ANNUAL MEETING The Annual Meeting of Shareholders will take place on Tuesday, November 17, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. at RAVE Restaurant Group, Inc. 3551 Plano Parkway The Colony, TX 75056 F 20