Quarterlytics / Industrials / RBR Group Limited

RBR Group Limited

rbr · ASX Industrials
Claim this profile
Ticker rbr
Exchange ASX
Sector Industrials
Industry
Employees 11-50
← All annual reports
FY2011 Annual Report · RBR Group Limited
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
R U B I C O N (cid:2)
Resources Limited

A B N   8   1

3

1 5   8 5 7   9 8 8

2011 ANNUAL REPORT

CORPORATE 
DIRECTORY

Directors

Company  
Secretary 

Principal 
Registered  
Office

Ian Macpherson - Non-Executive Chairman 
Peter Eaton - Managing Director  
Ian Buchhorn - Non-Executive Director

Auditor

Sam Middlemas

Butler Settineri (Audit) Pty Ltd  
Unit 16, 1st Floor,  
100 Railway Road, Subiaco
Western Australia 6008 

Level 2, 91 Havelock Street, West Perth
Western Australia 6005 

PO Box 534, West Perth  
Western Australia 6872 

Telephone:  (08) 9214 7500 
Facsimile: 
(08) 9214 7575 

Email: 
info@rubiconresources.com.au  
Internet:  www.rubiconresources.com.au

Share  
Registry

Security Transfer Registrars Pty Limited 
770 Canning Highway, Applecross 
Western Australia 6153 

Telephone:  (08) 9315 2333 
Facsimile: 
(08) 9315 2233 

Email:  registrar@securitytransfer.com.au 

Stock  
Exchange

The Company's shares are quoted on  
the Australian Stock Exchange.
The Home Exchange is Perth.

ASX Code  

RBR - ordinary shares

CONTENTS

Chairman’s Letter  01

Statement of Cashflows   22

Review of Operations  02

Notes to the Financial Statements  23

Concise Financial Report  11

Directors’ Declaration  24

Directors’ Report  12

Auditor’s Independence Declaration  25

Statement of Comprehensive Income  19

Independent Audit Report  26

Statement of Financial Position  20

Corporate Governance Statement  28

Statement of Changes In Equity  21

ASX Additional Information  36

\\   Annual Report  2011

CHAIRMAN’S 
LETTER

DEAR SHAREHOLDERS,

On behalf of the Board of Directors of Rubicon 
Resources Ltd (“Rubicon” or “the Company”) I 
present the Company’s Annual Report for 2011,  
my first year as Chair.

Notwithstanding, Rubicon retains five active joint 
ventures with large and mid-cap companies under 
which the Company is carried for total expenditures 
of approximately $7m.

At the AGM in November 2010 your Board were 
confident that Rubicon was on the path to success 
and a positive market re-rating in calendar 2011 on 
the basis of:

(cid:115)(cid:0) our extensive and prospective project portfolio;
(cid:115)(cid:0) our strong joint venture alliances; and
(cid:115)(cid:0) our capital structure and improved cash position.

Unfortunately the March quarter of 2011 has proved 
to be the only positive period since then.

The 2011 year has continued to be a difficult year for 
junior exploration companies with Rubicon, and the 
sector in general, affected by limits on access to new 
capital, weakening commodity prices and resultant 
downward pressure on market capitalisation.

As outlined in my recent (25 August 2011) letter to 
shareholders, whilst we maintain that our West 
Australian exploration tenements and interests are 
both high quality and well located within well 
endowed mineralised belts, the projects now require 
the large drill budgets that are more suited to larger 
mining companies.  Given the continued weakness 
in capital markets and declining interest amongst 
larger Industry participants in early stage broad-base 
exploration this is not, at present, a viable alternative 
available to Rubicon. 

The Company continues to actively seek alternate 
forms of funding for its remaining 100% owned 
Australian projects either through further joint venture 
or outright divestment. The Caesar Hill (Traka 
Resources Ltd) Joint Venture is the most recent 
example of this partnership strategy. 

Whilst actively reducing direct early stage exploration 
efforts, Rubicon continues to search for more 
advanced, higher production potential projects, 
which we believe will deliver greater value to the 
Company in the near term. 

Again, as I outlined in my August letter, major areas 
of focus for both desk top reviews and project visits 
to date have been West Africa and Indonesia. More 
recently we have extended the country review efforts 
to include Turkey.

We look forward to updating shareholders on our 
company strategy in this regard at the forthcoming 
annual general meeting.

Whilst it has been a difficult and sometimes 
frustrating year we are confident our project review 
and assessment efforts will be successful as we 
head towards the new calendar year.

Thank you for your continued support.

Ian Macpherson

Chairman

BELOW (from left to right): 
Peter Eaton, Ian Macpherson  
Andrew Ford, Ian Buchhorn 
and Sam Middlemas

“we are confident our project 
review and assessment efforts 
will be successful as we head 
towards the new calendar year.”

1

“ create shareholder returns through the 
successful acquisition of projects that 
we believe have the capacity to 
become profitable mining operations.”

OPERATIONAL OVERVIEW

Rubicon's goal is to create shareholder returns 
through the successful acquisition of projects that we 
believe have the capacity to become profitable 
mining operations.  Rubicon also believes that its 
existing tenement portfolio in Western Australia has 
significant exploration merit for gold in particular, but 
requires larger drilling budgets than our current 
capital base allows.  For this reason, Rubicon 
continues to attempt to add value for shareholders 
through joint ventures with quality partners or other 
exploration partnerships.  

Rubicon controls some 3,500km² of prospective 
tenements in Western Australia (Figure 1). In the first 
half of the year, Rubicon continued active exploration 
of these projects, with key results as follows:

(cid:115)(cid:0) Ongoing aircore drilling of the Celia project 

defined numerous gold-anomalous structures 
over many kilometres of strike.  

(cid:115)(cid:0) Reverse circulation (RC) drilling at Jeedamya 
confirmed the presence of a volcanogenic 
massive sulphide (VMS) system with anomalous 
copper and zinc.

(cid:115)(cid:0) Drilling by joint venture partners at 

Yindarlgooda defined a significant area of gold 
mineralisation at the Red Dale North prospect. 

CORPORATE OVERVIEW

Rubicon listed on 2 February 2007 and now has 
142.3 million shares on issue and 12.1 million 
unlisted options as at the date of this report. As at 30 
June 2011, the Company retained $2.8 million cash.

In November 2010, a successful Share Purchase 
Plan was completed to raise $1,000,000 at a price 
of 4 cents per share.  The offering was over-
subscribed and 25,000,000 Rubicon shares were 
issued accordingly.

Also in November 2010, Mr Ian Macpherson joined 
the Board of Rubicon as Non-Executive Chairman.  
Mr Macpherson is a Chartered Accountant with 

(cid:115)(cid:0) A major airborne electromagnetic (VTEM) 

survey was completed over the Caesar Hill 
and Jackie Junction tenements at Warburton, 
defining numerous anomalies at Caesar Hill.  

(cid:115)(cid:0) The Wyloo iron ore tenement was granted 

late in the year and Rubicon has commenced 
exploration for buried Channel Iron Deposits.   

Following a decision to change the strategy of the 
Company in late 2010, Rubicon has focussed its 
activities on pursuing more advanced projects, both in 
Australia and internationally.  Rubicon has reviewed a 
large number of project opportunities, principally for 
gold and copper, but also for other commodities.  
Coupled with this search there has been the pursuit of 
new joint ventures or other divestment/funding options 
for Rubicon's Western Australian tenements.  During 
the year, Vale S.A., St Barbara Ltd and Dominion 
Mining Ltd withdrew from the Warburton, Rocky Dam 
and Yalla Burra joint ventures respectively.  However, 
new joint ventures were agreed with Integra Mining 
Ltd at Yindarlgooda and Kingsgate Consolidated Ltd 
and Traka Resources Ltd at Warburton.  

Rubicon’s exploration expenditure for the year 
comprised $2.1 million, including $0.67 million in 
joint venture contributions from Vale.  The majority 
of this expenditure was incurred in the first half.  

over thirty years experience in finance, principally in 
the provision of corporate and financial advice to 
the mining and mineral exploration industry.   
Mr Macpherson took up a placement of 12,500,000 
ordinary shares in Rubicon at 4 cents per share, 
raising $500,000.  The placement was approved by 
shareholders at the November 2010 Annual General 
Meeting.  Mr Macpherson is now Rubicon's largest 
shareholder with a 9.0% holding in the company.

An additional 10,000,000 shares were also issued 
to sophisticated investors in November 2010, 
raising an additional $400,000.

2

\\   Annual Report  2011

REVIEW 
OF OPERATIONS

RIGHT: Figure 1 - 
Location Map 
Showing Rubicon 
Projects

FIGURE 1

CELIA PROJECT

Rubicon has a ground holding of approximately 
1,200km2 over the southern part of the Laverton 
Tectonic Zone, one of Australia’s most productive 
gold provinces, hosting gold deposits including 
Sunrise Dam (+10m oz of gold), Wallaby (7.1m oz), 
Granny Smith (2.5m oz), Safari Bore (0.5m oz) and 
Red October (0.3m oz) (Figures 1 & 2).  The 
project leases also cover part of the ultramafic belt 
that hosts the Eucalyptus Bore nickel laterite 
deposit and includes Rubicon’s Larkins Find 
lateritic nickel deposit with an inferred resource of 
5.2 million tonnes at 0.8% nickel and 0.08% 
cobalt.  In addition, the Celia project area has 
numerous outcropping banded iron formations 
(BIFs) that are considered prospective for 
magnetite iron mineralisation.

Exploration work completed on the Celia project 
during the year comprised ongoing aircore drilling to 
test new targets and follow up previously defined 
anomalies.  An additional 128 aircore holes for 
6,327 metres were drilled to test gold targets at the 
Safari North, Red October Extended, Butcher Well 
South, Butcher Well Southeast and Crimson Belle 
prospects (Figure 2).  Drill programs were 
completed on newly granted tenements at the 
Crimson Belle and Butcher Well South East 
prospects, as was follow up drilling on gold 
anomalies defined from previous drilling.  This 
drilling confirmed the prospectivity of a number of 
structures for gold mineralisation, with gold 
anomalism recorded over considerable strike 
lengths.   Significant results are tabulated in Table 1 
and include:

(cid:115)(cid:0) At Safari North, drilling defined gold 

anomalism in a northerly trending structure 
over a 500m strike length around RCAC063 
(10m @ 1.85g/t gold).  Two scissor holes 
drilled beneath RCAC063 returned broad low 
grade zones (43m @ 0.23g/t gold), indicating 
an approximately 20 metre thick zone of low 
grade steeply dipping gold mineralisation.

(cid:115)(cid:0) At Butcher Well South East, traverse drilling 

defined a low order anomaly over 4.4 
kilometres along the same structure that 
hosts the Safari North prospect and the 
Safari Bore gold deposit to the south. Best 
results of 11m @ 0.34g/t and 4m @ 1.03g/t 
gold were reported. 

(cid:115)(cid:0) At Red October Extended, significant gold 

anomalism is associated with the intersection 
of a granite-greenstone contact and a 
northeasterly-trending structural dislocation 
that controls the Red October deposit to 
the northeast.  A best intersection of 7m @ 
0.85g/t gold was reported.

(cid:115)(cid:0) Drilling along the Mt Hornet Shear System, 

which is host to the Butcher Well gold deposit 
(0.3m ounces gold), returned 4m @ 0.22g/t 
gold at Butcher Well South. Twenty kilometres 
to the north along the same structural system 
at Crimson Belle, a best result of 4m @ 1.57g/t 
gold was intersected.

(cid:115)(cid:0) Other significant results include 1m @ 6.71g/t 
gold on BIF-hosted gold mineralisation at Gap 
Bore and 3m @ 2.85g/t gold at Choir Boy.

3

FIGURE 2

ABOVE: Figure 2 - 
Celia and Jeedamya 
Project Tenements, 
Geology & Deposits 

4

\\   Annual Report  2011

REVIEW 
OF OPERATIONS
CONTINUED

RIGHT: Table 1 
Celia Project - 
Significant Gold 
Intersections  
(> 1 gram-metre) 

PROSPECT
Gap Bore 2

HOLE  
ID
RCRB022

HOLE 
TYPE
RAB

NORTHING 
(M)
6738643

EASTING    
(M)
435760

FROM 
(M)
11

TO 
(M)
12

INTERVAL 
(M)
1

GOLD          
(G/T) 
6.71

TABLE 1

Gap Bore 3

RCRB059

Choir Boy

RCRB072

Safari North

RCAC0063
RCAC0083
RCAC0133
RCAC0159
RCAC0291
RCAC0292

RAB

RAB

Aircore
Aircore
Aircore
Aircore
Aircore
Aircore

6736599

437115

6736170

434569

6746090
6750100
6750403
6745695
6746088
6746082

443614
442503
442511
443657
443642
443575

Red October 
Extended
Crimson Belle

Butcher Well 
South

Butcher Well 
South East

RCAC0106 Aircore

6765708

439401

RCAC0183 Aircore

6769900

431005

RCRB0182
RCRB0202
RCAC0129
RCAC0216
RCAC0244
RCAC0266
RCAC0286

RAB
RAB
RAB
Aircore
Aircore
Aircore
Aircore

6757598
6753604

6760277
6759910
6757097
6759901
6756900

436100
436604

439791
439896
440990
439929
441000

20

44

21
50
62
46
41
36
52

38

28

32
42

46
54
41
48
60

24

48

31
58
66
50
84
38
55

48

32

36
46

58
58
44
72
64

4

4

10
8
4
4
43
2
3

10

4

4
4

12
4
3
24
4

0.74

2.17

1.85
0.21
0.44
0.26
0.23
0.90
0.36
0.72

1.57

0.30
0.30

0.34
1.03
0.78
0.17
0.34

CELIA PROJECT (CONTINUED)

The Celia project area has numerous BIF ridges 
outcropping throughout.  The Celia BIFs have an 
anomalously high magnetic intensity in relation to 
other Eastern Goldfields BIF occurrences, which is 
similar in magnitude to that of the iron deposits of 
the Midwest and Southern Cross regions.  The 
Celia BIFs all lie within 100 kilometres of the 
under-utilised Leonora-Esperance rail line (Figure 2).

Previous rock chip sampling was undertaken on a 
nominal 800m spacing over suitable BIF outcrops.  
Average grades of 250 samples (at a 25% Fe lower 
cut) are 31.2% Fe, 51.3% SiO2, 0.1% P2O5 and 
0.5% Al2O3.  These are excellent results in 
comparison to other Western Australian magnetite 
deposits under consideration for development.  
Sampled (outcrop) widths range up to 26 metres. 

JEEDAMYA PROJECT

The Jeedamya project is located near Kookynie,  
to the south of Leonora (Figures 1 & 2).  During  
the year, Rubicon tested previously-defined 
electromagnetic (EM) anomalies with deep RC drill 
holes.  Three holes for 744 metres were drilled into 
the three best defined conductors.  All three holes 
intersected zones of intense silica-pyrrhotite-pyrite 
alteration with minor chalcopyrite, within a mafic 
volcanic-sedimentary chert package at the contact 
with either an intermediate volcanic or a porphyritic 
felsic unit.

The altered zones exhibit consistently anomalous 
copper and zinc values of up to 0.5% zinc and 
0.3% copper, but typically less than 0.1%.   
Best results of 9m @ 0.25% zinc and 16m @ 0.11% 
copper were recorded within the altered zone in 
RDRC033 (Figure 3), which was sited under a 
shallow hole drilled by a previous explorer. The 
results are considered indicative of a VMS system, 
with the presence of semi-massive pyrrhotite 
anomalous in copper and zinc a feature of VMS 
alteration systems.  A joint venture partner is being 
sought to fund further drilling.

5

 
 
 
 
FIGURE 3

FIGURE 4

ABOVE: Figure 3 - 
Cross Section through 
RDRC033, Jeedamya

RIGHT: Figure 4 - 
Yindarlgooda Project – 
Geology, Tenements 
& Prospects 

6

\\   Annual Report  2011

REVIEW 
OF OPERATIONS
CONTINUED

YINDARLGOODA PROJECT

The Yindarlgooda Project comprises approximately 
800km2 of tenure centred 55km east of Kalgoorlie 
(Figure 4).  Known gold mineralisation within 
Rubicon tenure occurs at the Queen Lapage and 
QE1 deposits and Rubicon tenements are located 
adjacent to the recently-discovered 400,000 ounce 
Salt Creek gold deposit.  

Rubicon currently has two separate joint ventures 
with Integra Mining Ltd, a joint venture with 
Brimstone Resources Ltd and has significant 
ground in its own right (Figure 4).  

Peters Dam Joint Venture (Integra Mining Ltd 
earning 51 or 70% (at Rubicon’s election))

In July 2009, Rubicon entered into the Peters Dam 
joint venture with Integra Mining Ltd (Integra), on 
tenements adjacent to Integra’s Salt Creek gold 
deposit (Figure 4).  Under the terms of the 
agreement, Integra may spend $1.5 million over 
three years to earn a 51% interest in the tenements.  

At Rubicon’s election, Integra may then earn an 
additional 19% by the additional expenditure of 
$1.0 million over a further two years.  

During the year, RC drilling at Red Dale North and 
Salt Creek East (11 holes for 1,540 metres), RAB 
drilling at the Ross Teddy prospect (12 holes for 
369 metres) and a gravity survey over Salt Creek 
East and on tenements northeast of the Daisy 
Milano Mine were completed.

At Red Dale North, Integra drilled six RC holes to 
follow up on gold anomalism in previous Rubicon 
drilling, which included 28m @ 0.53g/t and 16m @ 
0.73g/t gold. Significant intercepts are shown in 
Table 2.  Gold mineralisation was intersected within 
hangingwall mafic sediments and shales adjacent 
to a footwall felsic volcanic unit, dipping shallowly to 
the east.  A north-south long section (Figure 5) 
shows the consistent zones of gold mineralisation 
across the limited extent of drilling to date.  Further 
drilling is planned.

TABLE 2

HOLE ID

NORTHING 
(MGA)

EASTING 

(MGA) AZIMUTH

DIP

RDNRC001

6562790

405530

RDNRC002

6562795

405590

090

090

-60

-60

FROM 
(M)
19
48

TO 
(M)
37
52

INTERVAL 
(M)
18
4

RDNRC003

6562715

405560

000

-60

RDNRC004

6562675

405560

000

-60

RDNRC005

6562710

405530

RDNRC006

6562715

405485

090

090

-60

-60

26
27
36
49
45
47
24
43
48

incl.
incl.
incl.

incl.

incl.

54
29
37
51
50
50
30
52
52

28
2
1
2
5
3
6
9
4

GOLD 
(G/T) 
0.16
1.13
NSV
0.63
3.46
1.00
2.23
1.56
1.90
0.91
1.33
2.32
NSV

FIGURE 5

RIGHT: Table 2 Red 
Dale North - 
Significant Drilling 
Intercepts

BELOW: Figure 5 - 
Red Dale North 
Prospect, Cross 
Section 405 560mE

7

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
FIGURE 6

FIGURE 7

ABOVE: Figure 6 – 
Warburton Project 
Location, Tenements, 
Geology & Targets 

RIGHT: Figure 7 - 
Location of Caesar 
Hill VTEM Anomalies 
on Gravity Tilt 
Processed Image

8

\\   Annual Report  2011

REVIEW 
OF OPERATIONS
CONTINUED

YINDARLGOODA PROJECT (CONTINUED)

Queen Lapage Joint Venture  
(Integra Mining Ltd earning 51-70%  
(at Rubicon's election))

In June 2011, Rubicon entered into the Queen 
Lapage Joint Venture with Integra on five tenements 
of approximately 100km2 that were previously part 
of the Rocky Dam Joint Venture (Figure 4). 

The Queen Lapage Joint Venture tenure 
encompasses the QE1 gold deposit, which occurs 
on the regionally important Randalls Fault.  Various 
other prospects with significant supergene gold 
anomalism are associated with this corridor.  Better 
intercepts at QE1 from shallow RC drilling include 
6m @ 6.33g/t, 6m @ 3.24g/t, 4m @ 3.79g/t, 8m @ 
2.48g/t and 8m @ 2.81g/t gold and are associated 
with sulphidic quartz veins in weathered shales and 
banded iron formation.  The agreement does not 
cover the Queen Lapage open cut mine.

The joint venture also covers the Rocky Dam base 
metal prospects, where previous drilling has 
intersected massive and disseminated pyrite with low 
grade base metal mineralisation (best result of 18m @ 
0.74% zinc and 0.20% copper).  Rubicon has a 
significant strike extent of the prospective volcano-
sedimentary sequence that hosts this mineralisation 
and hosts conductivity anomalies defined in 
electro-magnetic surveys.  These have not been drill 
tested as yet.

Integra may then earn an additional 19% by the 
additional expenditure of $1.0m over a further two 
years.  Integra must spend a minimum of $335,000 
in the first 12 months before withdrawal, including 
$150,000 in direct drilling costs.  Integra must then 
spend a minimum of $150,000 in direct drilling 
costs in the second and third years of the first 
earn-in phase of the joint venture and also in the 
first year of the second earn-in phase, if this is 
enacted.  The minimum drilling commitments will 
ensure that exploration is focused towards 
value-adding drilling activities. 

Mt McLeay Joint Venture  
(Brimstone Resources Ltd earning 51% to 70% 
(at Rubicon’s election))

During the year, Empire Resources Ltd assigned their 
rights in the Mt McLeay joint venture to Brimstone 
Resources Ltd, a private company that purchased 
the rights to the Penny's Find resource south of the 
joint venture tenements. As a result, there was no 
significant work undertaken on the tenements.

Rubicon Tenure (100%)

During the year, St Barbara Ltd withdrew from the 
Rocky Dam joint venture and Dominion Mining Ltd 
withdrew from the Yalla Burra joint venture.  At Rocky 
Dam, St Barbara completed RAB and aircore drilling 
at the Five Bob (32 holes for 1,897m) and Five Bob 
West prospects (10 holes for 608 metres).

Under the terms of the agreement, Integra may 
spend $1.0m over three years to earn a 51% 
interest in the tenements.  At Rubicon’s election, 

Joint venture partners are being sought for  
Rubicon tenure. 

WARBURTON PROJECT

The Warburton Project comprises approximately 
900km2 of exploration licences and two licences in 
ballot within the western Musgrave Province (Figures 
1 & 6).  The project has potential for the discovery of 
stratabound sediment-hosted copper (e.g. Mt Isa 
and Michigan Copper belt), magmatic nickel-copper 
(e.g. Babel/Nebo, Voisey’s Bay) and felsic-related 
gold mineralisation (e.g. Handpump prospect).

Anomaly 14 is particularly interesting, as geophysical 
modelling indicates that the anomaly has a high 
conductance consistent with massive Ni-Cu-PGE 
mineralisation and models as a steeply dipping 
tabular body.  The anomaly occurs over four lines, 
giving a potential 800m strike length.  Anomalies 1 
and 5 along strike to the north of anomaly 14 each 
extend over a strike length of 600m.

During the year, Rubicon and joint venture partner 
Vale S.A. flew two major airborne VTEM (Versatile 
Time Domain Electromagnetic) surveys over the 
Jackie Junction and Caesar Hill prospects.

The Caesar Hill VTEM survey was flown over the 
eastern half of the Caesar Hill tenement (Figure 6), 
where basal Giles Complex rocks have been 
previously mapped.  There has been no ground 
work undertaken on the Caesar Hill tenement to 
date and there have been no Native Title 
agreements signed for the tenement.  

The Caesar Hill survey identified four high priority 
targets located in the northwest of the tenement,  
all associated with prospective Giles Complex rock 
types in potential “feeder dyke” positions as inferred 
for the Babel-Nebo copper (Cu)-nickel (Ni)-Platinum 
Group Elements (PGE) mineralisation (Figure 7). 

Rubicon believes that the conductors identified have 
potential for the discovery of massive sulphide 
deposits, associated with significant amounts of 
disseminated Ni-Cu-PGE mineralisation and remain 
highly attractive targets.  This target style has many 
similarities to the nearby Babel-Nebo deposit of 
BHP-Billiton, located 16km to the southeast (Figure 7). 

The Jackie Junction VTEM survey identified several 
single line anomalies, which could represent small 
zones of massive sulphide surrounded by 
disseminated mineralisation; however, they may 
also be due to variations in overburden conductivity 
such as palaeochannels.  As such, the tenements 
were relinquished.

In early 2011, Vale withdrew from the Warburton 
joint venture.  Since that time, Rubicon has entered 
into two new joint ventures in the Warburton area.  
These are as follows:

9

REVIEW 
OF OPERATIONS
CONTINUED

WARBURTON PROJECT (CONTINUED)

Bentley Joint Venture  
(Kingsgate Consolidated Ltd earning 70%)

In December 2010, Rubicon entered into an 
agreement with Quadrio Resources Pty Ltd (a wholly 
owned subsidiary of Kingsgate Consolidated Ltd) 
(“Kingsgate”) to explore Exploration License 69/2578.  

Under the terms of the agreement, Kingsgate has 
the right to earn a 70% interest in the Bentley 
tenements through expenditure of $750,000 over a 
five year period.  Kingsgate will spend a minimum of 
$140,000 (net of Land Access Agreement costs) 
within 12 months from the commencement date.  
An additional granted tenement and two additional 
tenements under ballot (Figure 6) may be brought 
into the joint venture, with a commensurate 
increase in expenditure commitment.

The joint venture is contingent on signing an 
acceptable Land Access Agreement with the 
relevant Land Council and its Traditional Owners  
on terms acceptable to Kingsgate.  

WYLOO CHANNEL IRON PROJECT

The Wyloo project comprises two exploration 
licences, located 30km northwest of the Paulsens 
Gold deposit and 200km south of Dampier in the 
western Pilbara district of Western Australia (Figure 1).  
Exploration will target Channel Iron Deposits (CIDs) 
located along the western margin of the Hamersley 
Province.  Significant CID deposits such as those at 
the Robe River Iron Associates Pannawonica 
operations, Bungaroo Creek and Cane River Valley 
indicate that these deposits trend along ancient 
drainage systems to the west of the Hamersley

OTHER PROJECTS

The Errolls Project tenement, is located 
immediately northwest of the Barrambie vanadium 
deposit, approximately 80km north of Sandstone 
in Western Australia.  The tenement contains the 
interpreted northern extension of the highly 
magnetic gabbro complex that hosts the 
Barrambie magnetite-vanadium resource under 
shallow cover and is considered prospective for 
vanadium, magnetite and platinum group metals 
(PGMs) (Figure 1).

Competent Persons Statement

Kingsgate is a focused gold exploration and mining 
company and intends to principally explore for gold 
in the tenement as part of a larger project area, 
following the recent discovery of the Handpump 
gold mineralisation in the area by a third party.  The 
Bentley tenement has a structural setting and 
similar rock types to those at Handpump.

Caesar Hill Joint Venture  
(Traka Resources Ltd earning 70%)

In September 2011, Rubicon entered into an 
agreement with Traka Resources Ltd to explore the 
Caesar Hill Exploration License.  

Under the terms of the agreement, Traka has the 
right to earn a 70% interest in the Caesar Hill 
tenement through expenditure of $800,000 over a 
five year period, commencing from, and contingent 
on, gaining access for exploration through a Land 
Access Agreement.  Traka will spend a minimum of 
$150,000 (net of Land Access Agreement costs) 
within 12 months from the commencement date.

outcrops.  Two of these potential drainages may occur 
under recent alluvial drainages on E08/2078, which 
has recently been granted. 

Rubicon has also entered into an agreement with 
Onslow Resources Ltd to allow Onslow to mine 
river shingles from an excised mining lease within 
E08/2078.  Rubicon will receive a royalty of $0.50/
tonne on all material mined and will retain rights to 
all metals beneath the recent alluvial channel. 

At the Paddy Well Uranium Project, located 
340km east of Carnarvon in the Gascoyne region of 
Western Australia, previous explorers have identified 
primary uranium mineralisation in a vein network 
system within a chloritic alteration halo, associated 
with a surficial secondary uranium zone.  This 
setting is a classic East Alligator uranium setting, 
warranting exploration follow-up (Figure 1).

The information in this report that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr Peter Eaton, the Managing 
Director of Rubicon Resources Limited, who is a Member of the Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Eaton has sufficient 
experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and the activity being reported to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in 
the 2004 edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves, and consents 
to the release of information in the form and context in which it appears here.T

10

\\   Annual Report  2011

CONCISE 
FINANCIAL REPORT

The concise financial report is an extract from the full financial 
report of Rubicon Resources Limited for the year ended 30 June 
2011.  The financial statements and specific disclosures included  
in the concise financial report have been derived from the full 
financial report of Rubicon Resources Limited, and cannot be 
expected to provide as full an understanding of the financial 
performance, financial position and financing and investing  
activities of the Company as the full financial report.

Further financial information can be obtained from Rubicon 
Resources Limited’s full financial report, a copy of which, including 
the independent auditor’s report, is available to all shareholders on 
the Company’s website at www.rubiconresources.com.au, and 
will be sent to shareholders without charge on request.

FOR THE YEAR ENDED 
30 JUNE 2011

11
1111111111111

DIRECTORS’ 
REPORT

The Directors present their report on Rubicon Resources Limited for the year ended 30 June 2011.

DIRECTORS 

The names and details of the Directors of Rubicon Resources Limited during the financial year and until the date of this report are:

Ian Macpherson – BComm. CA

Non Executive Chairman 

Appointed 18 October 2010

Mr Macpherson is a Chartered Accountant with over thirty years experience in finance, principally in the provision of corporate and 
financial advice to the mining and mineral exploration industry.  In his early career, Mr Macpherson was a partner at KMG Hungerfords, 
which built up a specialist practice in the provision of corporate and financial advice to the mining and mineral exploration industry.  In 
1987 the firm merged with Arthur Andersen & Co.

In 1990, Mr Macpherson established Ord Partners (later to become Ord Nexia) and has specialised in the area of corporate advice with 
particular emphasis on capital structuring, equity and debt raising, corporate affairs and Stock Exchange compliance for public 
companies in the mining and industrial areas.  He has further been involved in numerous asset acquisitions and disposals.  He has acted 
in the role of Director and Company Secretary for a number of his clients and is currently a Non-Executive Chairman of Kimberly Rare 
Earth Limited (2 December 2010 to present), a Non-Executive Director of Navigator Resources Ltd (1 July 2003 to present), Avita Medical 
Ltd (5 March 2008 to present) and formerly Nimrodel Resources Ltd (17 July 2007 to 2 August 2011) and Sihayo Gold Limited (24 April 
2009 to 3 June 2010).  Ord Nexia has recently merged with MGI Perth and Mr Macpherson remains as a consultant to that group.

Mr Macpherson is a Member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia and past member of the Executive Council of the 
Association of Mining Exploration Companies (WA) Inc.

Peter Eaton – B.Sc (Hons), MAusIMM

Managing Director 

Appointed 3 July 2006

Mr Eaton is a geologist with more than 30 years of experience in exploration, mining and acquisitions roles in Australia and internationally 
(principally in the Asia–Pacific region).  Prior to joining Rubicon he was General Manager – Geology and Business Development with 
Aditya Birla Minerals Limited.  During his tenure there, Mr Eaton was a part of the team that completed a feasibility study on, and 
commissioned, the Nifty underground copper mine and completed a $300m capital raising and ASX listing of the company.  Mr Eaton 
previously held senior technical management positions with WMC Limited, including site–based chief geologist roles and senior regional 
exploration roles and has also had significant corporate experience in a number of listed exploration companies, including the previous 
role of Managing Director.

Ian Buchhorn – B.Sc (Hons), Dipl. Geosci (Min. Econ), MAusIMM

Non Executive Director 

Appointed 19 August 2005

Mr Buchhorn is a Mineral Economist and Geologist with more than 30 years experience.  He was the founding Managing Director of 
Heron Resources Limited for a period of 11 years until early 2007 and now continues as Executive Director.  Mr Buchhorn previously 
worked with a number of international mining companies and has worked on nickel, bauxite and industrial mineral mining and 
exploration, gold and base metal project generation and corporate evaluations. For the last 24 years Mr Buchhorn has acquired and 
developed mining projects throughout the Eastern Goldfields of Western Australian and has operated as a Registered Mine Manager.

During the three year period to the end of the financial year, Mr Buchhorn continues to hold a directorship in Heron Resources Limited 
(17 February 1995 to present).  He previously held directorships in Polaris Minerals NL (18 September 2006 to 7 January 2010) and 
Southern Cross Goldfields Ltd (24 July 2007 to 15 March 2010).  

Mr Robert Middlemas was appointed as Non Executive Director on 1 February 2010 and resigned on 18 October 2010. 

COMPANY SECRETARY

Robert (Sam) Middlemas – B.Com, PGradDipBus, CA.

Mr Middlemas was appointed Company Secretary and Chief Financial Officer on 17 July 2006.  He is a chartered accountant with more 
than 20 years experience in various financial and company secretarial roles with a number of listed public companies operating in the 
resources sector.  He is the principal of a corporate advisory company which provides financial and secretarial services specialising in 
capital raisings and initial public offerings.  Previously Mr Middlemas worked for an international accountancy firm.  His fields of expertise 
include corporate secretarial practice, financial and management reporting in the mining industry, treasury and cash flow management 
and corporate governance.

12

\\   Annual Report  2011

PRINCIPAL ACTIVITIES

The principal activities of the Company during the financial year consisted of mineral exploration and development principally in Western Australia.

There have been no significant changes in these activities during the financial year.

DIVIDENDS

No dividend has been paid since the end of the previous financial year and no dividend is recommended for the current year.

REVIEW OF OPERATIONS AND ACTIVITIES

The Company recorded an operating loss after income tax for the Year ended 30 June 2011 of $1,667,115 compared to an operating 
loss after income tax of $2,622,297 for the Year ended 30 June 2010. The large difference is related to significantly higher write-downs 
on exploration projects during the 2010 period and a reduced level of exploration activity during the current year.

The Company’s cash position remained strong at the end of the year at $2,760,616, following the successful Share Purchase Plan and 
Placement during November 2010, which raised a total of $1,900,000 at an issue price of 4 cents per share.

Rubicon is a mineral exploration company, currently focussed on gold and copper exploration in Western Australia, where it controls some 
3,500km² of prospective tenements.  Rubicon’s project portfolio consists of large contiguous areas within highly mineralised provinces.  

Rubicon’s strategy for ultimate growth is to combine the following elements:

(cid:115)(cid:0) Ongoing commitment to the identification and  review of projects/corporate opportunities that we believe have the capacity to 

successfully develop into a profitable mine, both in Australia and countries overseas,

(cid:115)(cid:0) Maximise the commercial value of the existing tenement portfolio through the ongoing establishment and maintenance of suitable 

joint ventures and other alternate funding arrangements where appropriate, and

(cid:115)(cid:0) continued exploration of Rubicon properties where appropriate.

Rubicon’s major projects are as follows:

(cid:115)(cid:0) The Celia project in the southern Laverton Tectonic Zone, where Rubicon has 1,200km2 of tenure around existing gold operations 

that is prospective for gold, nickel and iron.

(cid:115)(cid:0) The Yindarlgooda gold and base metal project located east of Kalgoorlie where Rubicon has tenements in its own right and three 

separate joint venture agreements with Integra Mining Ltd (two) and Brimstone Resources Ltd earning an interest in Rubicon tenure.

(cid:115)(cid:0) The Warburton project in the Western Musgrave Province, where Rubicon has two joint ventures with Kingsgate Consolidated and 

Traka Resources.

(cid:115)(cid:0) The Wyloo project where Rubicon will commence exploration for channel iron deposits.

CORPORATE AND FINANCIAL POSITION

As at 30 June 2011 the Company had cash reserves of $2.8 million.  

RISK MANAGEMENT

The Board is responsible for the oversight of the Company’s risk management and control framework. Responsibility for control and risk 
management is delegated to the appropriate level of management with the Managing Director having ultimate responsibility to the Board for 
the risk management and control framework.

Areas of significant business risk to the Company are highlighted in the Business Plan presented to the Board by the Managing Director 
each year.

Arrangements put in place by the Board to monitor risk management include monthly reporting to the Board in respect of operations and 
the financial position of the Company.

EMPLOYEES

The Company has 5 employees as at 30 June 2011 (2010: 8 employees). 

13

DIRECTORS’ 
REPORT

EARNINGS/LOSS PER SHARE 

Basic loss per share
Diluted loss per share

2011
CENTS
(1.36)

(1.36)

2010
CENTS
(2.94)

(2.94)

SIGNIFICANT CHANGES IN THE STATE OF AFFAIRS

In the opinion of the Directors there were no significant changes in the state of affairs of the Company that occurred during the financial 
year under review.

OPTIONS OVER UNISSUED CAPITAL

UNLISTED OPTIONS

During the financial year the Company granted the following unlisted options over unissued ordinary shares to the following Directors.   
All options were issued for Nil consideration:

ISSUED TO
Ian Macpherson

Peter Eaton

Peter Eaton

Peter Eaton

Ian Buchhorn

NUMBER OF 
OPTIONS 
GRANTED
2,500,000

EXERCISE  
PRICE
10 cents each

VALUE PER 
OPTION AT 
GRANT DATE
1.84 cents

VALUE OF 
OPTIONS 
GRANTED
$46,000

1,500,000

1,500,000

1,000,000

2,000,000

10 cents each

1.84 cents

15 cents each

1.55 cents

20 cents each

1.35 cents

10 cents each

1.84 cents

$27,600

$23,250

$13,500

$36,800

EXPIRY 
DATE
31 October 2014

31 October 2014

31 October 2014

31 October 2014

31 October 2014

Since 30 June 2011 and up until the date of this report there have been no further options issued.

As at the date of this report unissued ordinary shares of the Company under option are:

NUMBER OF OPTIONS ON ISSUE

6,000,000

1,500,000

1,000,000

2,600,000

1,000,000

EXERCISE 
PRICE

EXPIRY 
DATE

10 cents each

31 October 2014

15 cents each

31 October 2014

20 cents each

31 October 2014

14 cents each

13 January 2014

25 cents each

31 December 2011

The above options represent unissued ordinary shares of the Company under option as at the date of this report.  These unlisted options 
do not entitle the holder to participate in any share issue of the Company.

The holders of unlisted options are not entitled to any voting rights until the options are exercised into ordinary shares. 

The names of all persons who currently hold options granted are entered in a register kept by the Company pursuant to Section 168(1) of 
the Corporations Act 2001 and the register may be inspected free of charge.

No person entitled to exercise any option has or had, by virtue of the option, a right to participate in any share issue of any other 
body corporate.

CORPORATE STRUCTURE

Rubicon Resources Limited (ACN 115 857 988) is a company limited by shares that was incorporated on 19 August 2005 and is 
domiciled in Australia.    

EVENTS SUBSEQUENT TO BALANCE DATE

There has not arisen since the end of the financial year any item, transaction or event of a material and unusual nature likely, in the 
opinion of the Directors of the Company to affect substantially the operations of the Company, the results of those operations or the state 
of affairs of the Company in subsequent financial years.

14

\\   Annual Report  2011

LIKELY DEVELOPMENTS AND EXPECTED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Likely developments in the operations of the Company are included elsewhere in this Annual Report.  Disclosure of any further 
information has not been included in this report because, in the reasonable opinion of the Directors, to do so would be likely to prejudice 
the business activities of the Company.

ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION AND PERFORMANCE

The Company holds various exploration licences to regulate its exploration activities in Australia.  These licences include conditions and 
regulations with respect to the rehabilitation of areas disturbed during the course of its exploration activities.  So far as the Directors are 
aware there has been no known breach of the Company’s licence conditions and all exploration activities comply with relevant 
environmental regulations.

INFORMATION ON DIRECTORS

As at the date of this report the Directors’ interests in shares and unlisted options of the Company are as follows:

DIRECTOR
Ian Macpherson

Peter Eaton

Ian Buchhorn

TITLE
Non-Executive Chairman
Appointed on 18 October 2010 
Managing Director
Appointed on 3 July 2006
Non-Executive Director
Appointed on 19 August 2005

DIRECTORS’ MEETINGS 

DIRECTORS’ 
INTERESTS 
IN ORDINARY 
SHARES
12,831,630

DIRECTORS’ 
INTERESTS 
IN UNLISTED 
OPTIONS
2,500,000

1,475,000

4,000,000

8,859,777

2,000,000

The number of meetings of the Company’s Directors held in the period each Director held office during the financial year and the 
numbers of meetings attended by each Director were:

DIRECTOR
I Macpherson
I Buchhorn
P Eaton
S Middlemas

REMUNERATION REPORT

BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ MEETINGS
Meetings held 
while a director

Meetings 
Attended
7
10
10
3

7
10
10
3

Recommendation 8.1 of the ASX Corporate Governance Council’s Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations (2nd edition) 
states that the Board should establish a Remuneration Committee.  The Board has formed the view that given the number of Directors on 
the Board, this function could be performed just as effectively with full Board participation.  Accordingly it was resolved that there would be 
no separate Board sub-committee for remuneration purposes.

This report details the amount and nature of remuneration of each Director of the Company and executive officers of the Company during 
the year.

REMUNERATION REPORT

OVERVIEW OF REMUNERATION POLICY

The Board of Directors is responsible for determining and reviewing compensation arrangements for the Directors and the executive 
team.  The broad remuneration policy is to ensure that remuneration properly reflects the relevant person’s duties and responsibilities, 
and that the remuneration is competitive in attracting, retaining and motivating people of the highest quality.  The Board believes that the 
best way to achieve this objective is to provide the Managing Director and the executive team with a remuneration package consisting of 
a fixed and variable component that together reflects the person’s responsibilities, duties and personal performance.  An equity based 
remuneration arrangement for the Board and the executive team is in place.  The remuneration policy is to provide a fixed remuneration 
component and a specific equity related component, with no performance conditions. The Board believes that this remuneration policy is 
appropriate given the stage of development of the Company and the activities which it undertakes and is appropriate in aligning Director 
and executive objectives with shareholder and business objectives.

15

DIRECTORS’ 
REPORT
CONTINUED

REMUNERATION REPORT (CONTINUED) 

The remuneration policy in regard to setting the terms and conditions for the Managing Director has been developed by the Board taking 
into account market conditions and comparable salary levels for companies of a similar size and operating in similar sectors.

Directors receive a superannuation guarantee contribution required by the government, which is currently 9% per annum and do not 
receive any other retirement benefit. Some individuals, however, have chosen to sacrifice part or all of their salary to increase payments 
towards superannuation.

All remuneration paid to Directors is valued at cost to the Company and expensed.  Options are valued using either the Black-Scholes 
methodology or the Binomial model.  In accordance with current accounting policy the value of these options is expensed over the 
relevant vesting period.

NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS

The Board policy is to remunerate Non-Executive Directors at market rates for comparable companies for time, commitment and 
responsibilities. The Board determines payments to the Non-Executive Directors and reviews their remuneration annually, based on 
market practice, duties and accountability.  Independent external advice is sought when required.  The maximum aggregate amount of 
fees that can be paid to Non-Executive Directors is subject to approval by shareholders at a General Meeting.  The annual aggregate 
amount of remuneration paid to Non-Executive Directors was approved by shareholders on 7 November 2006 and is not to exceed 
$200,000 per annum.  Actual remuneration paid to the Company’s Non-Executive Directors is disclosed below.  Remuneration fees for 
Non-Executive Directors are not linked to the performance of the Company.  However, to align Directors’ interests with shareholder 
interests, the Directors are encouraged to hold shares in the Company and have all received options.

MANAGING DIRECTOR AND SENIOR MANAGEMENT

The remuneration of the Managing Director is dictated by his executive service agreement.

The Company aims to reward executives with a level of remuneration commensurate with their position and responsibilities within the 
Company so as to:

(cid:115)(cid:0) Reward executives for Company and individual performance against targets set by reference to appropriate benchmarks;
(cid:115)(cid:0) Reward executives in line with the strategic goals and performance of the Company; and
(cid:115)(cid:0) Ensure that total remuneration is competitive by market standards.

STRUCTURE

Remuneration consists of the following key elements:

(cid:115)(cid:0) Fixed remuneration; and

(cid:115)(cid:0)

Issuance of unlisted options

FIXED REMUNERATION

Fixed remuneration consists of base remuneration (which is calculated on a total cost basis including any employee benefits e.g. motor 
vehicles) as well as employer contributions to superannuation funds.

The level of fixed remuneration is set so as to provide a base level of remuneration which is both appropriate to the position and is 
competitive in the market.

Remuneration packages for the staff who report directly to the Managing Director are based on the recommendation of the Managing 
Director, subject to the approval of the Board in the annual budget setting process.

SERVICE AGREEMENT

The Managing Director, Mr Peter Eaton is employed under contract.  The current Service Agreement commenced on 26 June 2006.  

Under the terms of the present contract:

(cid:115)(cid:0) The Service Agreement has no fixed term.
(cid:115)(cid:0) Mr Eaton may resign from his position and thus terminate the contract by giving three months written notice.  On resignation any 

options that have not yet vested will lapse.

(cid:115)(cid:0) The Company may terminate the contract by providing three months written notice or provide payment in lieu of notice by the 

Company.  Any options that have vested, or will vest during the notice period will be available for exercise, whilst the options that 
have not yet vested will be forfeited.

16

\\   Annual Report  2011

(cid:115)(cid:0) The Company may terminate the contract at any time without notice if serious misconduct has occurred.  Where termination with 
cause occurs, the Managing Director is only entitled to that portion of remuneration which is fixed, and only up to the date of 
termination.  On termination with cause, any unvested options will immediately lapse.

(cid:115)(cid:0)

If the Managing Director and the Company agree to terminate the contract by mutual consent, or if the Managing Director is 
removed, or if the Company enters into a deed of arrangement with creditors, placed under the control of receivers or is in breach 
of regulations, the Company will pay a sum to the Managing Director up to a maximum of twelve months pro rata of base salary.  

Details of the nature and amount of each element of the emoluments of each Director and Executive Officer of Rubicon Resources 
Limited paid/accrued during the year are as follows:

2010/2011
Directors

I Macpherson – Chairman (i)

P Eaton – Managing Director

I Buchhorn – Non Executive 

S Middlemas – Non Executive (ii)

Executives

S Middlemas (ii) Company Secretary

A Ford – Exploration Manager

2009/2010

Directors

I Buchhorn – Chairman 

P Eaton – Managing Director

S Middlemas – Non Executive (ii)

J Shipp – Retired Chairman (iii)

Executives

S Middlemas (ii) Company Secretary

A Ford – Exploration Manager (iv)

K Cassidy – Exploration Manager (v)

PRIMARY

Base Salary/
Fees
$

Motor Vehicle/
Bonus
$

POST 
EMPLOYMENT
Superannuation
Contributions
$

43,348

247,999

57,500

7,200

48,980

186,000

45,335

193,948

10,000

16,098

57,882

109,154

107,284

-

9,346

3,901

22,320

-

-

-

-

-

9,346

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

16,740

3,363

50,000

-

35,246

-

9,824

4,236

EQUITY
COMPENSATION

Options
$

46,000

64,350

36,800

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

28,900

28,900

-

Total
$

93,249

344,015

94,300

7,200

48,980

202,740

48,698

253,294

10,000

51,344

86,782

147,878

111,520

i)  Mr Macpherson was appointed Non executive Chairman on 18 October 2010

ii)  Mr Middlemas was appointed a Non executive director on 1 February 2010, and resigned on 18 October 2010 – all fees as a director and 

company secretary were paid to Sparkling Investments Pty Ltd

iii)  Mr Shipp retired as Chairman on 1 February 2010

iv)  Mr Ford was appointed Exploration Manager on 23 November 2009 

v)  Mr Cassidy resigned from the Company on 9 October 2009

Other than the Directors and executive officers disclosed above there were no other executive officers who received emoluments during 
the financial year ended 30 June 2011.

INDEMNIFYING OFFICERS AND AUDITOR

During the year the Company paid an insurance premium to insure certain officers of the Company.  The officers of the Company 
covered by the insurance policy include the Directors named in this report.

The Directors and Officers Liability insurance provides cover against all costs and expenses that may be incurred in defending civil or criminal 
proceedings that fall within the scope of the indemnity and that may be brought against the officers in their capacity as officers of the 
Company.  The insurance policy does not contain details of the premium paid in respect of individual officers of the Company.  Disclosure of 
the nature of the liability cover and the amount of the premium is subject to a confidentiality clause under the insurance policy.

The Company has not provided any insurance for an auditor of the Company.

17

DIRECTORS’ 
REPORT
CONTINUED

INDEMNIFYING OFFICERS AND AUDITOR (CONTINUED)

SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

The terms and conditions of each grant of options affecting remuneration in this or future reporting periods are as follows:

Ian Macpherson

Peter Eaton

Peter Eaton

Peter Eaton

Ian Buchhorn

GRANTED

Number

2,500,000

1,500,000

1,500,000

1,000,000

2,000,000

Date of 
Grant

TERMS & CONDITIONS FOR EACH GRANT
Exercise 
Option  
Price ($)
Value ($)

Date of  
Vesting

25 Nov 2010

25 Nov 2010

25 Nov 2010

25 Nov 2010

25 Nov 2010

25 Nov 2010

25 Nov 2010

25 Nov 2010

25 Nov 2010

25 Nov 2010

0.0184

0.0184

0.0155

0.0135

0.0184

0.10

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.10

Expiry Date

31 Oct 2014

31 Oct 2014

31 Oct 2014

31 Oct 2014

31 Oct 2014

There were no amounts payable on the issue of the options, and there are no performance conditions attached.  All options previously 
issued are now fully vested and are exercisable at any time subject to employment being maintained.  When exercisable, each option is 
convertible into one ordinary share of Rubicon Resources Limited. 

AUDITORS’ INDEPENDENCE DECLARATION 

Section 370C of the Corporations Act 2001 requires the Company’s auditors Butler Settineri (Audit) Pty Ltd, to provide the Directors of 
the Company with an Independence Declaration in relation to the audit of the financial report.  This Independence Declaration is attached 
and forms part of this Directors’ Report.

NON-AUDIT SERVICES

The external auditors have not undertaken any non-audit work during the financial year.  

PROCEEDINGS ON BEHALF OF THE COMPANY

No person has applied for leave of Court to bring proceedings on behalf of the Company or intervene in any proceedings to which the 
Company is a party for the purpose of taking responsibility on behalf of the Company for all or any part of those proceedings.  The 
Company was not party to any such proceedings during the year.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

In recognising the need for the highest standards of corporate behaviour and accountability, the Directors of the Company support and have 
adhered to the principles of corporate governance. The Company’s corporate governance statement is contained in the Annual Report.

DATED at Perth this 21st day of September 2011

Signed in accordance with a resolution of the Directors

P Eaton

Managing Director

18

\\   Annual Report  2011

STATEMENT OF 
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2011

Other income 

Employee expenses

Non-Executive Directors’ fees

Insurance expenses

Company Secretarial fees

Corporate expenses

Depreciation 

Rent

Recruitment

Employee costs recharged to capitalised exploration

Expense of share-based payments

Exploration Written off

Other expenses 

Loss before income tax 

Income tax 

Net loss attributable to members of the Company

Other Comprehensive Loss net of tax

Total Comprehensive Loss

Basic earnings/(loss) per share
(cents per share)
Diluted earnings/(loss) per share
(cents per share)

THE COMPANY

2011
$

2010
$

182,039

132,892

736,187

111,949

21,473

48,980

79,578

23,118

103,006

-

(657,216)

147,150

1,096,620

138,309

1,667,115

-

828,128

110,040

22,470

57,882

70,122

56,523

101,764

42,087

(753,003)

75,140

2,039,920

104,116

2,622,297

-

1,667,115

2,622,297

-

-

1,667,115

2,622,297

(1.36) cents

(2.94) cents

(1.36) cents

(2.94) cents

The above Statement of Comprehensive Income should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.

19

STATEMENT OF 
FINANCIAL POSITION
AS AT 30 JUNE 2011

ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS

Cash and cash equivalents 

Other receivables

Other assets

TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS

NON-CURRENT ASSETS

Plant and equipment and motor vehicles

Capitalised mineral exploration expenditure

TOTAL NON-CURRENT ASSETS

TOTAL ASSETS

LIABILITIES
CURRENT LIABILITIES

Trade and other payables

Provisions 

TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES

TOTAL LIABILITIES

NET ASSETS

EQUITY
Contributed equity

Share Option Reserve

Accumulated losses

TOTAL EQUITY

2011
$

2010
$

2,760,616

2,640,356

3,430

15,333

25,399

19,883

2,779,379

2,685,638

38,099

3,488,405

3,526,504

6,305,883

59,421

3,479,375

3,538,796

6,224,434

59,103

32,703

91,806

91,806

292,278

98,114

390,392

390,392

6,214,077

5,834,042

14,741,596

12,841,596

586,640

(9,114,159)

6,214,077

439,490

(7,447,044)

5,834,042

The above Statement of Financial Position should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.

20

\\   Annual Report  2011

STATEMENT OF 
CHANGES IN EQUITY 
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2011

BALANCE AT 1 JULY 2009

TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

TRANSACTIONS WITH OWNERS IN THEIR 
CAPACITY AS OWNERS

Shares issued during the year

Directors and Employees options

BALANCE AT 30 JUNE 2010

TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

TRANSACTIONS WITH OWNERS IN THEIR 
CAPACITY AS OWNERS

Shares issued during the year

Directors and Employees options

BALANCE AT 30 JUNE 2011

CONTRIBUTED 
EQUITY

SHARE BASED 
PAYMENT 
RESERVE

11,868,496

364,350

-

973,100

-

12,841,596

-

1,900,000

-

14,741,596

-

-

75,140

439,490

-

-

147,150

586,640

LOSSES

(4,824,747)

(2,622,297)

TOTAL

7,408,099

(2,622,297)

-

-

(7,447,044)

(1,667,115)

973,100

75,140

5,834,042

(1,667,115)

-

-

(9,114,159)

1,900,000

147,150

6,214,077

The above statements of changes in equity should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.

21

STATEMENT OF 
CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2011

Cash flows from operating activities

Interest received

Payments to suppliers and employees (inclusive of goods and services tax)

Net cash used in operating activities

Cash flows from investing activities

Payments for exploration and evaluation

Funds received from sale of exploration tenement

Funds received from joint venture partners

Payments for plant and equipment and motor vehicles

Net cash used in investing activities

Cash flows from financing activities

Proceeds from the issue of shares

Net cash provided by financing activities

Net increase (decrease) in cash held

Cash at the beginning of the financial year

Cash at the end of the financial year

The above Statement of Cash Flows should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.

2011
$

140,289

(496,153)

(355,864)

2010
$

132,892

(613,650)

(480,758)

(2,096,943)

(1,947,416)

-

674,863

(1,796)

-

823,862

(10,187)

(1,423,876)

(1,133,741)

1,900,000

1,900,000

120,260

2,640,356

2,760,616

960,600

960,600

(653,899)

3,294,255

2,640,356

22

\\   Annual Report  2011

NOTES 
TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2011

1. 

BASIS OF PREPARATION

The concise financial report has been prepared in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001 and Accounting Standard AASB 1039 
‘Concise Financial Reports’.  The concise financial report including the financial statements and specific disclosures included in the 
concise financial report has been derived from the full financial report of Rubicon Resources Limited (“Rubicon” or “Company”).   

Rubicon Resources Limited is a company limited by shares incorporated and domiciled in Australia whose shares are publicly traded on 
the official list of the Australian Stock Exchange.  The financial statements are presented in Australian dollars which is the Company’s 
functional currency.

2. 

SALES REVENUE

The Company had no sales revenue.

3. 

DIVIDENDS

There were no dividends paid or payable during the financial year.

4. 

SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Company operates predominantly in one segment involved in the mineral exploration and development industry.   Geographically the 
Company is domiciled and operates in one segment being Australia.

5. 

EVENTS SUBSEQUENT TO BALANCE DATE

There has not arisen since the end of the financial year any item, transaction or event of a material and unusual nature likely, in the 
opinion of the Directors of the Company to affect substantially the operations of the Company, the results of those operations or the state 
of affairs of the Company in subsequent financial years.

23

DIRECTORS’ 
DECLARATION

The directors declare that in their opinion, the concise financial report of Rubicon Resources Limited for the year ended 30 June 2011 as 
set out on pages 12 to 23 complies with Accounting Standard AASB 1039: Concise Financial Reports.

The concise financial report is an extract from the full financial report for the year ended 30 June 2011.  The financial statements and 
specific disclosures included in the concise financial report have been derived from the full financial report.

The concise financial report cannot be expected to provide as full an understanding of the financial performance, financial position and 
financing and investing activities of the Company as the full financial report which is available on request.

This declaration is made in accordance with a resolution of directors.

P Eaton

Managing Director

21 September 2011

24

\\   Annual Report  2011

AUDITORS’ 
INDEPENDENCE DECLARATION 

25

INDEPENDENT AUDIT 
REPORT 

26

\\   Annual Report  2011

27

CORPORATE 
GOVERNANCE STATEMENT

This statement outlines the main corporate governance practices in place during the financial year, which comply with the ASX Corporate 
Governance Council recommendations unless otherwise stated.  A copy can be found on the Company website at 
www.rubiconresources.com.au.

1. 

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

1.1 

ROLE OF THE BOARD AND MANAGEMENT - ASX PRINCIPLE 1

The Board of Rubicon Resources Limited is responsible for its corporate governance, that is, the system by which the Company is 
managed.  In governing the Company, the Directors must act in the best interests of the Company as a whole.  It is the role of senior 
management to manage the Company in accordance with the direction and delegations of the Board and the responsibility of the Board 
to oversee the activities of management in carrying out these delegated duties.

In carrying out its governance role, the main task of the Board is to drive the performance of the Company.  The Board must also ensure 
that the Company complies with all of its contractual, statutory and any other legal obligations, including the requirements of any 
regulatory body.  The Board has the final responsibility for the successful operations of the Company.  In addition the board is responsible 
for identifying areas of significant business risk and ensuring arrangements are in place to adequately manage those risks.

To assist the Board to carry out its functions, it has developed a Code of Conduct to guide the Directors and key executives in the 
performance of their roles.  The Code of Conduct is detailed in Section 3.1 of this Statement.

The Board represents shareholders’ interests in developing and then continuing a successful mineral resources business, which seeks to 
optimise medium to long-term financial gains for shareholders. By not focusing on short-term gains for shareholders, the Board believes 
that this will ultimately result in the interests of all stakeholders being appropriately addressed when making business decisions.

The Board is responsible for ensuring that the Company is managed in such a way to best achieve this desired result. Given the size of 
the Company’s exploration and development activities, the Board currently undertakes an active, not passive role. 

The Board is responsible for evaluating and setting the strategic directions for the Company, establishing goals for management and monitoring 
the achievement of these goals. The Managing Director is responsible to the Board for the day-to-day management of the Company.

The Board has sole responsibility for the following:

(cid:115)(cid:0) Appointing and removing the Managing Director and any other executive director and approving their remuneration;
(cid:115)(cid:0) Appointing and removing the Company Secretary/Chief Financial Officer and approving their remuneration; 
(cid:115)(cid:0) Determining the strategic direction of the Company and measuring the performance of management against approved strategies;
(cid:115)(cid:0) Reviewing the adequacy of resources for management to properly carry out approved strategies and business plans; 
(cid:115)(cid:0) Adopting operating and exploration expenditure budgets at the commencement of each financial year and monitoring the 

progress by both financial and non-financial key performance indicators;

(cid:115)(cid:0) Monitoring the Company’s medium term capital and cash flow requirements;
(cid:115)(cid:0) Approving and monitoring financial and other reporting to regulatory bodies, shareholders and other organisations;
(cid:115)(cid:0) Determining that satisfactory arrangements are in place for auditing the Company’s financial affairs;
(cid:115)(cid:0) Reviewing and ratifying systems of risk management and internal compliance and control, codes of conduct and compliance with 

legislative requirements; and

(cid:115)(cid:0) Ensuring that policies and compliance systems consistent with the Company’s objectives and best practice are in place and that 

the Company and its officers act legally, ethically and responsibly on all matters.

The Board’s role and the Company’s corporate governance practices are being continually reviewed and improved as the Company’s 
business develops.

The Board convenes regular meetings with such frequency as is sufficient to appropriately discharge its responsibilities.

The Board may from time to time, delegate some of its responsibilities listed above to its senior management team.

The Managing Director is responsible for running the affairs of the Company under delegated authority from the Board and implementing 
the policies and strategy set by the Board.  In carrying out his responsibilities the Managing Director must report to the Board in a timely 
manner and ensure all reports to the Board present a true and fair view of the Company’s operational results and financial position.

The role of management is to support the Managing Director and implement the running of the general operations and financial business 
of the Company, in accordance with the delegated authority of the Board.

28

\\   Annual Report  2011

1.2 

COMPOSITION OF THE BOARD - ASX PRINCIPLE 2

To add value to the Company, the Board has been formed so that it has effective composition, size and commitment to adequately 
discharge its responsibilities and duties.  The names of the Directors and their qualifications and experience are disclosed in the Directors’ 
Report.  Directors are appointed based on the specific professional qualifications, corporate experience, resource industry knowledge and 
experience, public company management experience, technical and operational skills required by the Company at this time.

The Company’s board changed during the year with the appointment of Mr Ian Macpherson as Non-Executive Chairman, on 18 October 
2010.  Mr Sam Middlemas the Company Secretary resigned from the board on this date and Mr Ian Buchhorn who was acting Chairman 
reverted to a Non-Executive Director role.  As a consequence, the board comprised one Executive (Managing Director) and two 
Non-Executive Directors.  The Company recognises the importance of Non-Executive Directors and the external perspective and advice 
that Non-Executive Directors can off offer.

None of the board meets the independence criteria under the ASX Corporate Governance Council Recommendations 2.1, as all 
Directors are either executives, substantial shareholders or have been consultants to the Company within the last three years.  The Board 
views shareholdings of Directors as important, although this is outside the ASX Recommendations criteria for independence, as it 
believes it more correctly aligns the Board with shareholder interests.  In addition, the Non-Executive Chairman Ian Macpherson does not 
meet the ASX Corporate Governance Council Recommendation 2.2 as his is not an independent director. 

At present the Board considers that the Company is not currently of a size, nor are its affairs of such complexity to justify the expense of 
the appointment of additional independent Non-Executive Directors.  The existing Directors provide the necessary diversity of 
qualifications, skill and experience and bring quality and independent judgement to all relevant issues.

If the Company’s activities increase in size, nature and scope the size of the Board will be reviewed and the optimum number of directors 
required for the Board to properly perform its responsibilities and functions will be re-assessed.

The Board acknowledges that a greater proportion of independent Non-Executive Directors is desirable over the longer term and will be 
seeking to demonstrate that it is monitoring the Board’s composition as required.

The membership of the Board, its activities and composition is subject to periodic review. The criteria for determining the identification 
and appointment of a suitable candidate for the Board shall include the quality of the individual’s background, experience and 
achievement, compatibility with other Board members, credibility within the Company’s scope of activities, intellectual ability to contribute 
to Board duties and physical ability to undertake Board duties and responsibilities.

Directors are initially appointed by the full Board subject to election by shareholders at the next Annual General Meeting. Under the 
Company’s Constitution the tenure of Directors (other than Managing Director) is subject to re-appointment by shareholders not later 
than the third anniversary following their last appointment. Subject to the requirements of the Corporations Act 2001, the Board does not 
subscribe to the principle of retirement age and there is no maximum period of service as a Director. A managing director may be 
appointed for any period and on any terms the Directors think fit and, subject to the terms of any agreement entered into, the Board may 
revoke any appointment.

1.3 

RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE BOARD - ASX PRINCIPLE 1

In general, the Board is responsible for, and has the authority to determine, all matters relating to the policies, practices, management and 
operations of the Company.  It is required to do all things that may be necessary to be done in order to carry out the objectives of the Company.  

Without intending to limit this general role of the Board, the principal functions and responsibilities of the Board include the following:

(cid:115)(cid:0) Leadership of the Company - overseeing the Company and establishing codes that reflect the values of the Company and guide 

the conduct of the Board, management and employees.

(cid:115)(cid:0) Strategy Formulation - working with senior management to set and review the overall strategy and goals for the Company and 

ensuring that there are policies in place to govern the operation of the Company.

(cid:115)(cid:0) Overseeing Planning Activities - overseeing the development of the Company’s strategic plans (including exploration programmes 

and initiatives) and approving such plans as well as the annual budget.

(cid:115)(cid:0) Shareholder Liaison - ensuring effective communications with shareholders through an appropriate communications policy and 

promoting participation at general meetings of the Company.

(cid:115)(cid:0) Monitoring, Compliance and Risk Management - overseeing the Company’s risk management, compliance, control and 

accountability systems and monitoring and directing the operational and financial performance of the Company.

(cid:115)(cid:0) Company Finances - approving expenses in excess of those approved in the annual budget and approving and monitoring 

acquisitions, divestitures and financial and other reporting.

(cid:115)(cid:0) Human Resources - appointing, and, where appropriate, removing the Managing Director as well as reviewing the performance of 
the Managing Director and monitoring the performance of senior management in their implementation of the Company’s strategy.

(cid:115)(cid:0) Ensuring the Health, Safety and Well-Being of Employees - in conjunction with the senior management team, developing, 

overseeing and reviewing the effectiveness of the Company’s occupational health and safety systems to ensure the well-being of 
all employees.

(cid:115)(cid:0) Delegation of Authority - delegating appropriate powers to the Managing Director to ensure the effective day-to-day management 

of the Company and establishing and determining the powers and functions of the Committees of the Board.

29

CORPORATE 
GOVERNANCE STATEMENT
CONTINUED

1. 

BOARD OF DIRECTORS (CONTINUED)

1.4 

BOARD POLICIES - ASX PRINCIPLE 3

1.4.1  Conflicts of Interest

Directors must:

(cid:115)(cid:0) disclose to the Board actual or potential conflicts of interest that may or might reasonably be thought to exist between the 

interests of the Director and the interests of any other parties in carrying out the activities of the Company; and 

(cid:115)(cid:0)

if requested by the Board, within seven days or such further period as may be permitted, take such necessary and reasonable 
steps to remove any conflict of interest.

If a Director cannot, or is unwilling to, remove a conflict of interest then the Director must, as per the Corporations Act 2001, absent 
himself from the room when discussion and/or voting occurs on matters about which the conflict relates.  

1.4.2  Commitments

Each member of the Board is committed to spending sufficient time to enable them to carry out their duties as a Director of the Company.

1.4.3  Confidentiality

In accordance with legal requirements and agreed ethical standards, Directors and key executives of the Company have agreed to keep 
confidential, information received in the course of the exercise of their duties and will not disclose non-public information except where 
disclosure is authorised or legally mandated.

1.4.4 

Independent Professional Advice

The Board collectively and each Director has the right to seek independent professional advice at the Company’s expense, up to 
specified limits, to assist them to carry out their responsibilities.

1.4.5  Related Party Transactions

Related party transactions include any financial transaction between a Director and the Company.  Unless there is an exemption under 
the Corporations Act 2001 from the requirement to obtain shareholder approval for the related party transaction, the Board cannot 
approve the transaction.

1.4.6  Trading in the Company Shares

The Company’s share trading policy imposes basic trading restrictions on all employees of the Company with ‘inside information’, and 
additional trading restrictions on the Directors of the Company.  

‘Inside information’ is information that:

(cid:115)(cid:0)

(cid:115)(cid:0)

is not generally available; and

if it were generally available, it would, or would be likely to, influence investors in deciding whether to buy or sell the Company’s securities.

If an employee possesses inside information, the person must not:

trade in the Company’s securities;

(cid:115)(cid:0)
(cid:115)(cid:0) advise others or procure others to trade in the Company’s securities; or
(cid:115)(cid:0) pass on the inside information to others – including colleagues, family or friends – knowing (or where the employee or Director 

should have reasonably known) that the other persons will use that information to trade in, or procure someone else to trade in, 
the Company’s securities.

This prohibition applies regardless of how the employee or Director learns the information (e.g. even if the employee or Director overhears 
it or is told in a social setting).

In addition to the above, Directors must notify the Company Secretary as soon as practicable, but not later than 2 business days, after 
they have bought or sold the Company’s securities or exercised options. In accordance with the provisions of the Corporations Act 2001 
and the ASX Listing Rules, the Company on behalf of the Directors must advise the ASX of any transactions conducted by them in the 
securities of the Company.

Breaches of this policy will be subject to disciplinary action, which may include termination of employment.

1.4.7  Attestations by Managing Director and Company Secretary 

In accordance with the Board’s policy, the Managing Director and the Company Secretary/Chief Financial Officer made the 
attestations recommended by the ASX Corporate Governance Council as to the Company’s financial condition prior to the Board 
signing this Annual Report.

30

\\   Annual Report  2011

2. 

BOARD COMMITTEES

The Board considers that the Company is not currently of a size, nor are its affairs of such complexity, to justify the formation of separate 
or special committees at this time.  The Board as a whole is able to address the governance aspects of the full scope of the Company’s 
activities and to ensure that it adheres to appropriate ethical standards.  

The Board has, however, established a framework for the management of the Company including a system of internal controls, a 
business risk management process and the establishment of appropriate ethical standards.

The full Board currently holds meetings at such times as may be necessary to address any general or specific matters as required.

If the Company’s activities increase in size, scope and nature, the appointment of separate or special committee’s will be reviewed by the 
Board and implemented if appropriate.

2.1 

AUDIT COMMITTEE - ASX PRINCIPLE 4

The Company does not have an audit committee.  While this is a departure from ASX Corporate Governance Council Recommendations 
4.1 and 4.2, it provides a more efficient mechanism based on the size of the Board and the complexity of the Company.

In the absence of an audit committee, the Board sets aside time at two Board meetings during the year to meet with the auditors and to 
deal with the issues and responsibilities usually delegated to the audit committee so as to ensure the integrity of the financial statements 
of the Company and the independence of the external auditor.

The Board in its entirety reviews the audited annual financial statements and the audit reviewed half-yearly financial statements and any 
reports which accompany published financial statements.

The Board in its entirety considers the appointment of the external auditor and reviews the appointment of the external auditor, their 
independence, the audit fee and any questions of resignation or dismissal.

The Board is also responsible for establishing policies on risk oversight and management.

2.2 

REMUNERATION COMMITTEE - ASX PRINCIPLE 9

The Company does not have a remuneration committee.  While this is a departure from ASX Corporate Governance Council 
Recommendation 9.1, it provides a more efficient mechanism based on the size and complexity of the Company.  

The responsibilities of the Board in its entirety include setting policies for senior officers’ remuneration, setting the terms and conditions of 
employment for the Managing Director, reviewing the Rubicon Resources Limited Employee Share Option Plan, reviewing superannuation 
arrangements, reviewing the remuneration of Non-Executive Directors and undertaking an annual review of the Managing Director’s 
performance, including setting, with the Managing Director, goals for the coming year and reviewing progress in achieving those goals.

The Company is committed to remunerating its executives in a manner that is market competitive and consistent with best practice as 
well as supporting the interests of shareholders.  

There is no scheme to provide retirement benefits, other than statutory superannuation, to Non-Executive Directors.

For a full discussion of the Company’s remuneration philosophy and framework and the remuneration received by Directors in the current 
period please refer to the Remuneration Report, which is contained within the Directors’ Report. 

2.3 

NOMINATION COMMITTEE - ASX PRINCIPLE 2

The Company does not have a nomination committee.  While this is a departure from ASX Corporate Governance Council 
Recommendation 2.4, it provides a more efficient mechanism based on the size and complexity of the Company.

The responsibilities of the Board in its entirety include devising criteria for Board membership, regularly reviewing the need for various 
skills and experience on the Board and identifying specific individuals for nomination as Directors for review by the Board.  The Board 
also oversees management succession plans, including the Managing Director and his direct reports, and evaluates the Board’s 
performance and makes recommendations for the appointment and removal of Directors.

Directors are appointed based on the specific governance skills required by the Company.  Given the size of the Company and the 
business that it operates, the Company aims at all times to have at least one Director with experience in the mining and exploration 
industry, appropriate to the Company’s market.  In addition, Directors should have the relevant blend of personal experience in:

(cid:115)(cid:0) accounting and financial management;

legal skills; and

(cid:115)(cid:0)
(cid:115)(cid:0) Managing Director – appropriate business experience.

31

CORPORATE 
GOVERNANCE STATEMENT
CONTINUED

3. 

ETHICAL STANDARDS

The Board acknowledges the need for continued maintenance of the highest standard of corporate governance practice and ethical 
conduct by all Directors and employees of the Company.

3.1 

CODE OF CONDUCT FOR DIRECTORS AND KEY EXECUTIVES - ASX PRINCIPLE 3

The Board has adopted a Code of Conduct for Directors and key executives to promote ethical and responsible decision-making. The 
code is based on a code of conduct for Directors prepared by the Australian Institute of Company Directors.  

In accordance with legal requirements and agreed ethical standards, Directors and key executives of the Company:

(cid:115)(cid:0) will act honestly, in good faith and in the best interests of the whole Company;
(cid:115)(cid:0) owe a fiduciary duty to the Company as a whole;
(cid:115)(cid:0) have a duty to use due care and diligence in fulfilling the functions of office and exercising the powers attached to that office;
(cid:115)(cid:0) will undertake diligent analysis of all proposals placed before the Board;
(cid:115)(cid:0) will act with a level of skill expected from directors and key executives of a publicly listed company;
(cid:115)(cid:0) will use the powers of office for a proper purpose, in the best interests of the Company as a whole;
(cid:115)(cid:0) will demonstrate commercial reasonableness in decision making;
(cid:115)(cid:0) will not make improper use of information acquired as Directors and key executives;
(cid:115)(cid:0) will not disclose non-public information except where disclosure is authorised or legally mandated;
(cid:115)(cid:0) will keep confidential, information received in the course of the exercise of their duties and such information remains the property 
of the Company from which it was obtained and it is improper to disclose it, or allow it to be disclosed, unless that disclosure has 
been authorised by the person from whom the information is provided, or is required by law;

(cid:115)(cid:0) will not take improper advantage of the position of Director or use the position for personal gain or to compete with the Company;
(cid:115)(cid:0) will not take advantage of Company property or use such property for personal gain or to compete with the Company; 
(cid:115)(cid:0) will protect and ensure the efficient use of the Company’s assets for legitimate business purposes; 
(cid:115)(cid:0) will not allow personal interests, or the interests of any associated person, to conflict with the interests of the Company;
(cid:115)(cid:0) have an obligation to be independent in judgment and actions, and Directors will take all reasonable steps to be satisfied as to the 

soundness of all decisions of the Board;

(cid:115)(cid:0) will make reasonable enquiries to ensure that the Company is operating efficiently, effectively and legally towards achieving its goals;
(cid:115)(cid:0) will not engage in conduct likely to bring discredit upon the Company;
(cid:115)(cid:0) will encourage fair dealing by all employees with the Company’s suppliers, competitors and other employees;
(cid:115)(cid:0) will encourage the reporting of unlawful/unethical behaviour and actively promote ethical behaviour and protection for those who 

report violations in good faith;

(cid:115)(cid:0) will give their specific expertise generously to the Company; and
(cid:115)(cid:0) have an obligation, at all times, to comply with the spirit, as well as the letter of the law and with the principles of this Code.

3.2 

CODE OF ETHICS AND CONDUCT - ASX PRINCIPLE 3

The Company has implemented a Code of Ethics and Conduct, which provides guidelines aimed at maintaining high ethical standards, 
corporate behavior and accountability within the Company.  

All Directors and employees are expected to:

(cid:115)(cid:0)

(cid:115)(cid:0)

respect the law and act in accordance with it;

respect confidentiality and not misuse Company information, assets or facilities;

value and maintain professionalism;

(cid:115)(cid:0)
(cid:115)(cid:0) avoid real or perceived conflicts of interest;
(cid:115)(cid:0) act in the best interests of shareholders;
(cid:115)(cid:0) by their actions, contribute to the Company’s reputation as a good corporate citizen, which seeks the respect of the community 

and environment in which it operates;

(cid:115)(cid:0) perform their duties in ways that minimise environmental impacts and maximise workplace safety;
(cid:115)(cid:0) exercise fairness, courtesy, respect, consideration and sensitivity in all dealings within their workplace and with customers, 

suppliers and the public generally; and

(cid:115)(cid:0) act with honesty, integrity, decency and responsibility at all times.

32

\\   Annual Report  2011

An employee that breaches the Code of Ethics and Conduct may face disciplinary action. If an employee suspects that a breach of  
the Code of Ethics and Conduct has occurred or will occur, he or she must advise that breach to management. No employee will be 
disadvantaged or prejudiced if he or she reports in good faith a suspected breach. All reports will be acted upon and kept confidential.

As part of its commitment to recognising the legitimate interests of stakeholders, the Company has established the Code of Ethics and 
Conduct to guide compliance with legal and other obligations to legitimate stakeholders.  These stakeholders include employees, 
government authorities, creditors and the community as whole.  This Code includes the following:

Responsibilities to Shareholders and the Financial Community Generally - ASX Principle 10

The Company complies with the spirit as well as the letter of all laws and regulations that govern shareholders’ rights.  The Company has 
processes in place designed to ensure the truthful and factual presentation of the Company’s financial position and prepares and 
maintains its accounts fairly and accurately in accordance with the generally accepted accounting and financial reporting standards.

Employment Practices

The Company endeavours to provide a safe workplace in which there is equal opportunity for all employees at all levels of the Company.  
The Company does not tolerate the offering or acceptance of bribes or the misuse of the Company’s assets or resources.

Responsibilities to the Community

As part of the community, the Company:

is committed to conducting its business in accordance with applicable environmental laws and regulations and encourages all employees 
to have regard for the environment when carrying out their jobs;

(cid:115)(cid:0) encourages all employees to engage in activities beneficial to their local community; and

(cid:115)(cid:0)

supports community charities.

The Company supports the Indigenous Community and:

(cid:115)(cid:0)

is committed to conducting its business in accordance with applicable heritage laws and regulations and encourages all 
employees to have regard for the specific rights of indigenous communities when carrying out their jobs; and

(cid:115)(cid:0) encourages all employees to engage in activities beneficial to the indigenous community.

Responsibility to the Individual 

The Company is committed to keeping private information, which has been provided by employees and investors, confidential and 
protecting it from uses other than those for which it was provided.

Conflicts of Interest

Employees and Directors must avoid conflicts as well as the appearance of conflicts between their personal interests and the interests of 
the Company.

How the Company Monitors and Ensures Compliance with its Code

The Board, management and all employees of the Company are committed to implementing this Code of Ethics and Conduct and each 
individual is accountable for such compliance.  

Disciplinary measures may be imposed for violating the Code.

33

CORPORATE 
CORPORATE 
GOVERNANCE STATEMENT
GOVERNANCE
CONTINUED

4. 

DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION

4.1 

CONTINUOUS DISCLOSURE TO ASX - ASX PRINCIPLE 5

The continuous disclosure policy requires all executives and Directors to inform the Managing Director or, in their absence, the Company 
Secretary of any potentially material information as soon as practicable after they become aware of that information. 

Information is material if it is likely that the information would influence investors who commonly acquire securities on ASX in deciding 
whether to buy, sell or hold the Company’s securities.

Information is not material and need not be disclosed if:

(cid:115)(cid:0) a reasonable person would not expect the information to be disclosed or it is material but due to a specific valid commercial 

reason is not to be disclosed; and

the information is confidential; or

(cid:115)(cid:0)
(cid:115)(cid:0) one of the following applies:

 –

 –

 –

 –

 –

 –

 –

 –

it would breach a law or regulation to disclose the information;

the information concerns an incomplete proposal or negotiation;

the information comprises matters of supposition or is insufficiently definite to warrant disclosure;

the information is generated for internal management purposes;

the information is a trade secret;

it would breach a material term of an agreement, to which the Company is a party, to disclose the information;

it would harm the Company’s potential  or possible patent application; or

the information is scientific data that release of which may benefit the Company’s potential competitors.

The Managing Director is responsible for interpreting and monitoring the Company’s disclosure policy and where necessary informing the 
Board. The Company Secretary is responsible for all communications with ASX.

4.2 

COMMUNICATION WITH SHAREHOLDERS - ASX PRINCIPLE 6

The Company places considerable importance on effective communications with shareholders. 

The Company’s communication strategy requires communication with shareholders and other stakeholders in an open, regular and 
timely manner so that the market has sufficient information to make informed investment decisions on the operations and results of the 
Company. The strategy provides for the use of systems that ensure a regular and timely release of information about the Company to be 
provided to shareholders.  Mechanisms employed include:

(cid:115)(cid:0) announcements lodged with ASX;
(cid:115)(cid:0) ASX Quarterly Reports;
(cid:115)(cid:0) half Yearly Report and Annual Report; and 
(cid:115)(cid:0) presentations at the Annual General Meeting/General Meetings.

The Board encourages the full participation of shareholders at the Annual General Meeting to ensure a high level of accountability and 
understanding of the Company’s strategy and goals. 

The Company also posts all reports, ASX and media releases and copies of significant business presentations on the Company’s website.

34

\\   Annual Report  2011

5. 

RISK MANAGEMENT

5.1 

IDENTIFICATION OF RISK - ASX PRINCIPLE 7

The Board is responsible for the oversight of the Company’s risk management and control framework. Responsibility for control and risk 
management is delegated to the appropriate level of management within the Company with the Managing Director and Company 
Secretary having ultimate responsibility to the Board for the risk management and control framework.

Areas of strategic, operational, legal, business and financial risks are identified, assessed and monitored to assist the Company to 
achieve its business objectives, and are highlighted in the Business Plan presented to the Board by the Managing Director each year.  
The main operational risks have been identified as retaining quality staff, commodity prices and exchange rate fluctuations, the generally 
increasing cost of operations in the mining industry, Native Title issues and access to capital.

Arrangements put in place by the Board to monitor risk management include monthly reporting to the Board in respect of operations and 
the financial position of the Company.

5.2 

INTEGRITY OF FINANCIAL REPORTING - ASX PRINCIPLE 7

The Company’s Managing Director and Company Secretary report in writing to the Board that:

(cid:115)(cid:0)

(cid:115)(cid:0)

(cid:115)(cid:0)

the financial statements of the Company for each half and full year present a true and fair view, in all material aspects, of the 
Company’s financial condition and operational results and are in accordance with accounting standards;

the above statements are founded on a sound system of risk management and internal compliance and control, which 
implements the policies adopted by the Board; and

the Company’s risk management and internal compliance and control framework is operating efficiently and effectively in all 
material respects.  

5.3 

AUDIT AND ROLE OF AUDITOR - ASX PRINCIPLE 6

The Company’s internal preparation of the Half Yearly audit review and the Financial Year audit includes preparing the Financial 
Statements and accompanying explanatory notes, conducting a series of routine reviews and financial tests and reviewing the carrying 
value of all assets.  The Company auditor is required to attend the Annual General Meeting and be available to answer shareholder 
questions about the conduct of the audit and the preparation and content of the auditor’s report.

Rubicon provides updates on the changes in its circumstances as and when they occur by continuous disclosure in compliance with the 
ASX Listing Rules, press releases, investor presentations and making all announcements and corporate information available on the 
Company’s website.

6. 

PERFORMANCE REVIEW - ASX PRINCIPLE 8

The Board has adopted a self-evaluation process to measure its own performance during each financial year. This process includes a 
review in relation to the composition and skills mix of the Directors of the Company.

Arrangements put in place by the Board to monitor the performance of the Company’s executives include:

(cid:115)(cid:0) a review by the Board of the Company’s financial performance; and
(cid:115)(cid:0) annual performance appraisal meetings incorporating analysis of key performance indicators with each individual to ensure that 

the level of reward is aligned with respective responsibilities and individual contributions made to the success of the Company.

35

ASX 
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 

SUMMARY OF MINING TENEMENTS

SUB-PROJECT

TENEMENT  
ID

NATURE OF 
INTEREST

DATE 
GRANTED

SUB-PROJECT

TENEMENT  
ID

NATURE OF 
INTEREST

DATE 
GRANTED

E15/00918
Yindarlgooda
E25/00392
Yindarlgooda
E25/00335
Yindarlgooda
E25/00355
Yindarlgooda
E25/00422
Yindarlgooda
E25/00456
Yindarlgooda
E26/00153
Yindarlgooda
E26/00154
Yindarlgooda
E27/00330
Yindarlgooda
E27/00337
Yindarlgooda
E27/00425
Yindarlgooda
E27/00430
Yindarlgooda
E27/00431
Yindarlgooda
E27/00443
Yindarlgooda
E27/00449
Yindarlgooda
E27/00454
Yindarlgooda
E27/00456
Yindarlgooda
M25/00344
Yindarlgooda
P25/01992
Yindarlgooda
P27/01924 - 1927
Yindarlgooda
P27/01947 - 1949
Yindarlgooda
P28/01213
Yindarlgooda
E15/00869
Peter Dam JV
E25/00307
Peter Dam JV
E25/00319
Peter Dam JV
E25/00376
Peter Dam JV
E25/00379
Peter Dam JV
E25/00390
Peter Dam JV
E25/00391
Peter Dam JV
E25/00433
Peter Dam JV
E25/00434
Peter Dam JV
P27/01711
Mt McLeay JV
P27/01748 - 1749
Mt McLeay JV
P27/01954
Mt McLeay JV
P27/01979
Mt McLeay JV
P27/02006
Mt McLeay JV
Queen Lapage JV E25/00273
Queen Lapage JV E25/00326
Queen Lapage JV E27/00426
Queen Lapage JV E25/00455
Queen Lapage JV E27/00291

Yindarlgooda Project
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2

Celia Project

Laverton Tectonic E38/02221 
Laverton Tectonic E38/02222
Laverton Tectonic E38/02224
Laverton Tectonic E38/02267
Laverton Tectonic E38/02304
Laverton Tectonic E38/02306
Laverton Tectonic E38/02490
Laverton Tectonic E38/02491
Mt Celia
Mt Celia
Mt Celia
Mt Celia
Mt Celia
Mt Celia
Mt Celia
Mt Celia

E31/00926 - 927
E31/00949
E31/00951
E31/00956
E31/00957
E31/00963
E31/00964
E39/01278

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

2-Mar-2007
29-Dec-2009
26-Feb-2007
10-Nov-2009
24-May-2010
8-Jun-2011
6-May-2011
6-May-2011
9-Feb-2009
26-Feb-2007
8-Sep-2010
25-Jan-2011
Pending
4-Jul-2011
Pending
Pending
Pending
14-Dec-2010
28-Jan-2009
23-Apr-2008
22-Sep-2008
3-Feb-2011
21-Dec-2005
21-Jun-2005
21-Feb-2006
30-Jan-2009
22-Dec-2009
10-Nov-2009
10-Nov-2009
22-Nov-2011
22-Nov-2011
28-May-2008
28-May-2008
19-Feb-2009
29-Oct-2009
29-Jun-2010
23-Mar-2006
1-Nov-2006
8-Sep-2010
25-Mar-2011
28-Apr-2006

23-Mar-2010
1-Sep-2009
17-Aug-2010
9-Feb-2010
26-Mar-2010
17-Aug-2010
21-Jul-2011
Pending
7-Dec-2010
29-Jun-2011
26-Sep-2011
Pending
23-Aug-2011
9-Sep-2011
Pending
14-May-2008

Mt Celia
Mt Celia
Mt Celia
Mt Celia
Mt Celia
Mt Celia
Mt Celia
Mt Celia
Mt Celia
Mt Celia
Mt Celia
Mt Celia
Mt Celia
Mt Celia
Mt Celia
Mt Celia
Mt Celia
Mt Celia
Mt Celia
Mt Celia
Mt Celia
Mt Celia
Mt Celia
Mt Celia
Mt Celia
Mt Howe
Mt Howe
Mt Howe
Mt Howe
Butchers Well
Butchers Well
Butchers Well
Yilgangi
Yilgangi
Yilgangi
Yilgangi
Yilgangi

Celia Project (Continued)
1
E39/01363
1
E39/01369
1
E39/01370
1
E39/01430
1
E39/01444
1
E39/01460
1
E39/01462
1
E39/01478
1
E39/01486 
1
E39/01487
1
E39/01488
1
E39/01489
1
E39/01504
1
E39/01515
1
E39/01539 
1
E39/01548
1
E39/01560 - 1561
1
E39/01576
1
E39/01580
1
P39/04887
1
P39/04899 - 4901
1
P39/04935
1
P39/04977
1
P39/05028
1
P39/05035 - 5036
1
E39/01132
1
E39/01182
1
E39/01248
1
E39/01317
1
E39/01403
1
E39/01409
1
E39/01410
1
E31/00721
1
E31/00814
1
E31/00958 - 959
1
P31/01815
1
P31/01832 - 1834

Desdemona Project

Kookynie
Kookynie

E40/00195
E40/00293

Caesar Hill JV
Warburton
Bentley JV
Bentley JV
Bentley JV

Wyloo
Wyloo

Errolls 

Warburton Project

E69/02253
E69/02192
E69/02578
E69/02656
E69/02885 - 2886

Wyloo Project

E08/02078
E08/02228

Erolls Project

E57/00837

Paddy Well Project

Paddy Well  

E09/01796

Wallareenya Project

Wallareenya
Wallareenya

E45/03809
E45/03833

Leonora Project

Leonora Project

P37/08042

1
1

2
1
2
2
2a

1
1

1

1

1
1

1

18-Sep-2008
5-Sep-2008
24-Feb-2009
23-Sep-2009
29-Oct-2009
5-Jan-2010
8-Feb-2010
26-Feb-2010
27-May-2010
9-Mar-2010
27-May-2010
25-Mar-2010
27-Jul-2010
27-Jul-2010
18-Nov-2010
15-Oct-2010
17-Dec-2010
11-Mar-2011
28-Apr-2011
25-Nov-2008
27-Mar-2009
9-Jan-2009
23-Jul-2009
1-Dec-2009
24-Dec-2009
27-Oct-2006
16-Oct-2007
13-Aug-2007
16-Jun-2008
23-Jul-2009
23-Jul-2009
23-Jul-2009
23-Nov-2006
25-Nov-2008
18-Aug-2008
28-May-2008
28-Aug-2008

20-Apr-2006
4-May-2011

19-Jul-2007
14-Apr-2008
Pending
3-Nov-2010
Pending

2-Aug-2011
19-Aug-2011

Pending

21-Apr-2011

Pending
Pending

Pending

1.  Tenements 100% owned by Rubicon Resources Ltd
2.  Tenements 100% owned by Rubicon Resources Limited, subject to joint venture
2a. Tenements 100% owned by Rubicon Resources Limited, subject to joint venture - contested application
3.  Tenements 100% owned by Heron Resources Limited or its subsidiaries;  Rubicon Resources Limited has all non-nickel exploration and mining rights

36

\\   Annual Report  2011

Pursuant to the Listing Requirements of the Australian Stock Exchange Limited, the shareholder information set out below was applicable 
as at 5 October 2011.

A. 

DISTRIBUTION OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Analysis of numbers of shareholders by size of holding:

DISTRIBUTION SHAREHOLDERS
1 – 1,000
1,001 – 5,000
5,001 – 10,000
10,001 – 100,000
More than 100,000
Totals

NUMBER OF 
SHAREHOLDERS
231
335
209
659
235
1,669

NUMBER OF 
SHARES

71,226
881,464
1,645,334
25,844,720
113,861,754
142,304,498

There were 1,020 holders of less than a marketable parcel of ordinary shares.

B. 

SUBSTANTIAL SHAREHOLDERS

An extract of the Company’s Register of Substantial Shareholders (who holds 5% or more of the issued capital) is set out below.

SHAREHOLDER NAME
I Macpherson & Associates
I J Buchhorn and related entities

C. 

TWENTY LARGEST SHAREHOLDERS

The names of the twenty largest holders of quoted shares are listed below:

ISSUED ORDINARY SHARES 

Number of Shares
12,863,630
8,859,777

Percentage of Shares

9.04%
6.22%

SHAREHOLDER NAME
FATS PL (MACIB Super A/C)
FATS PL (MACIB FAM A/C)
Kurana Pty Ltd (Buchhorn Unit Fund)
CVRD Australia EA Pty Ltd
VALE Aust EA PL
Barker Bruce G&WA (Barker Retmnt Fund)
Sandhurst Ttees Ltd (JMFG Consol A/C)
Masen Properties Pty Ltd
Hazurn PL (Buchhorn S/F A/C)
PASO Holdings PL
Gregorach PL
Hopetoun Nom PL
Wise Daniel Paul (Ark Inv A/C)
National Nom PL
Citicorp Nom PL
Eaton Peter Charles & Teresa (Eaton S/F A/C)
Kavalex PL
Dupy Oliver R&JE (Enerjee S/F A/C)
Mizon Annette Sylvia (Bobbin S/F A/C)
Lawrence Crowe Cons PL (LCC S/F A/C)

D. 

UNQUOTED OPTIONS

OPTIONS
Unlisted options exercisable at 10 cents each by 31 October 2014
Unlisted options exercisable at 15 cents each by 31 October 2014
Unlisted options exercisable at 20 cents each by 31 October 2014
Unlisted options exercisable at 14 cents each by 13 January 2014

LISTED ORDINARY SHARES 

Number

7,500,000
5,331,630
5,062,537
4,000,000
2,423,995
2,405,753
2,250,000
2,010,000
1,855,906
1,698,626
1,550,000
1,538,485
1,538,485
1,526,951
1,487,136
1,475,000
1,470,866
1,175,000
1,126,515
1,111,949
48,538,834 

Percentage Quoted
5.27%
3.75%
3.56%
2.81%
1.70%
1.69%
1.58%
1.41%
1.30%
1.19%
1.09%
1.08%
1.08%
1.07%
1.05%
1.04%
1.03%
.83%
.79%
.78%
34.10%

NUMBER OF OPTIONS

6,000,000
1,500,000
1,000,000
2,600,000
11,100,000

E. 

VOTING RIGHTS

In accordance with the Company’s Constitution, voting rights in respect of ordinary shares are on a show of hands whereby each 
member present in person or by proxy shall have one vote and upon a poll each share shall have one vote. 

37

Level 2, 91 Havelock Street, West Perth
Western Australia 6005 

PO Box 534, West Perth 
Western Australia 6872

Telephone:  (08) 9214 7500 
Facsimile: 
(08) 9214 7575  
Email: info@rubiconresources.com.au  

www.rubiconresources.com.au