Quarterlytics / Industrials / Aerospace & Defense / Redwire

Redwire

rdw · LSE Industrials
Claim this profile
Ticker rdw
Exchange LSE
Sector Industrials
Industry Aerospace & Defense
Employees 1001-5000
← All annual reports
FY2015 Annual Report · Redwire
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
Redrow plc

A N N U A L   R E P O R T   2 0 1 5

R
e
d
r
o
w
p
l
c

A
n
n
u
a
l

R
e
p
o
r
t
2
0
1
5

Redrow plc

Redrow House, St. David’s Park, Flintshire CH5 3RX
Tel: 01244 520044 Fax: 01244 520720

Email: groupservices@redrow.co.uk

 
 
 
 
Strategic Report

Governance Report

WE STRIVE TO CREATE 
ENVIRONMENTS THAT 
WILL STAND THE   
TEST OF TIME AND 
WHERE PEOPLE CAN 
APPRECIATE AND 
ENJOY THEIR 
SURROUNDINGS

H E R I T A G E

P R E M I E R

R E G E N T

The Heritage Collection combines the  
best of traditional architecture with modern 
interiors designed for family living.

Influenced by traditional residences, the Premier 
range of Redrow’s Heritage Collection offers 
elegant homes in outstanding locations.

The Regent Collection is inspired by elegant  
formal townhouses and offers modern, flexible 
family-friendly interiors across multiple floors. 

Read more on pages 12 to 13

Read more on pages 14 to 15

Read more on pages 16 to 17

1

Redrow plc Annual Report 2015

1

A B O D E

Abode homes offer a fresh, contemporary  
approach to home design, with clean lines and 
open plan layouts for a new way of living.

B E S P O K E

Unique homes in unique locations, our  
Bespoke Collection is designed to make the  
most of exceptional environments. 

Read more on pages 18 to 19

Read more on pages 20 to 23

PAGE TITLERedrow’s committed and enthusiastic team take enormous pride in the homes we build  and the communities we create. As a prestigious housebuilder, Redrow has a reputation for highly imaginative design, build quality and excellent customer service. Our collections  have something for everyone:Financial StatementsRedrow plc Annual Report 2015Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Shareholder InformationW E   P R I D E   O U R S E LV E S   O N
D E L I V E R I N G   Q UA L I T Y   H O M E S 
TO   O U R   C U S TO M E R S  A N D  VA L U E 
TO   O U R   S H A R E H O L D E R S

E S S E N T I A L   R E A D I N G

O U R   I N V E S T M E N T   C A S E
Pages 4 to 5

O U R   B U S I N E S S   M O D E L
Pages 6 to 7

O U R   S T R A T E G Y
Pages 8 to 9

C H A I R M A N ’ S   S TAT E M E N T
Pages 24 to 25

C O N T E N T S

Strategic Report

03 

Financial Highlights

04   Our Investment Case

06   Our Business Model

08  Our Strategy

10   Our Markets

Governance Report

56  

Corporate Governance Report

60 

64 

Board of Directors

Audit Committee Report

68   Nomination Committee Report

69  

Sustainability Committee Report

24  

Chairman’s Statement

70   Directors’ Remuneration Report

26   Operating Review

34 

38 

Financial Review

Risk Management and Risks

44  

Sustainability

84 

88 

Directors’ Report

Statement of Directors’  
Responsibilities

Financial Statements

89  

94  

94  

95 

96 

97 

Independent Auditors’ Report

Consolidated Income Statement

Consolidated Statement  
of Comprehensive Income

Balance Sheets

Statement of Changes in Equity

Statement of Cash Flows

98  

Accounting Policies

102   Notes to the Financial Statements

Shareholder Information

125   Notice of Annual General Meeting

129  Glossary

130   Corporate and Shareholder Information

131   Five Year Summary

Governance Report

Financial Statements

Shareholder Information

FI N A N C I A L   H I G H L I G H T S

£204m

44.5p

£133m

28.6p

£69m

15.6p

13

14

15

PROFIT  
BEFORE TAX

£204m

+53%

13

14

15

ADJUSTED EARNINGS 
PER SHARE

44.5p

+56%

O P E R AT I O N A L   H I G H L I G H T S

117

103

92

3,451

2,963

2,474

26.4%

20.5%

12.3%

13

14

15

RETURN 
ON EQUITY

26.4%

+29%

£524m

£482m

£260m

13

14

15

13

14

15

13

14

15

OUTLETS AT JUNE

PRIVATE LEGAL COMPLETIONS

PRIVATE ORDER BOOK

+14%

+16%

+9%

2

3

PAGE TITLEStrategic ReportRedrow plc Annual Report 2015Redrow plc Annual Report 2015O U R   I N V E S T M E N T   C A S E

W H Y   C H O O S E 
R E D R O W ?

EXPERTISE IN  
LAND BUYING 

EXCELLENT 
PRODUCT RANGE 

SUCCESSFUL 
LEADERSHIP TEAM 

A STRONG AND EFFICIENT 
BALANCE SHEET 

RESPONDING TO 
CUSTOMERS’ DEMANDS 

Redrow has the 
expertise and resources 
to ensure that the  
right land opportunities 
are taken to  
optimise returns.

Redrow’s portfolio of 
brands have excellent 
kerb appeal. Customer 
feedback about our 
product is very 
positive and this is 
endorsed by our track 
record in winning 
industry awards.

K E Y   2 0 1 5 
H I G H L I G H T S

c.5,900 plots added to
current land bank

Regent Collection revenue 
increased by 200% in year

c.2,000 plots pulled
through from forward
land bank

Redrow Homes wins Five 
Star Award for Customer 
Satisfaction for five 
consecutive years

Redrow’s strong, 
experienced and successful 
leadership team, together 
with its management 
structure, fosters a coherent 
and timely approach to 
implementing strategy  
and delivering results.
Career development is 
strongly encouraged  
through training.

15% of workforce on 
structured training 
programmes

12% of workforce on 
personal development plans

50% of director 
appointments in last two 
years from internal 
promotions

Redrow has a strong balance 
sheet with net assets of £849m 
and a balance of equity and debt. 
The Group is focused on delivering 
superior levels of return on capital 
employed and return on equity 
from an efficient use of its  
capital base.

By listening to and understanding our 
customers’ requirements, we continue 
to evolve our product and customer 
service. This involves broadening our 
channels to market, increasing our 
customer interaction throughout their 
home buying journey, building homes 
in appropriate locations and increasing 
our selection of options to allow 
customers to personalise their 
new homes.

CORPORATE 
SUSTAINABILITY AND 
RESPONSIBILITY 

Redrow understands that our 
strategy, performance and future 
expectations are inextricably 
linked to the creation of value 
through our socio-economic and 
environmental relationships.

Return on equity up 29% to 26.4% 

Return on capital employed up 
27% to 22.8%

14% growth in outlets to 
117 at June 2015

29% growth in Homes 
private revenue

£10m extras sold; 67%  
increase on 2014 levels

Over 200 hectares of public  
open space created, up 90%

£128m committed to fund 
improvements to local 
communities, up 13%

O U R 
B E N C H M A R K 
F O R   S U C C E S S 
I N   2 0 1 8

TUR NOVER (£bn)

OPERATING MARGIN (%)

E P S ( P )

ROE  (%)

£1.15bn

£1.60bn

T
E
G
R
A
T

£0.86bn

£0.60bn

15.9%

11.9%

18.5%

19.0%

T
E
G
R
A
T

44.5p

62.0p

T
E
G
R
A
T

28.6p*

15.6p*

20.5%

12.3%

26.4%

25.0%

T
E
G
R
A
T

4

5

*Excludes exceptional items and deferred tax rate changes

13

14

15

18

13

14

15

18

13

14

15

18

13

14

15

18

Strategic ReportGovernance ReportFinancial StatementsRedrow plc Annual Report 2015Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Shareholder InformationO U R   B US I N E S S   M O D E L

REDROW PRIDES ITSELF ON BEING  
A RESPONSIBLE DEVELOPER, DELIVERING SUSTAINABLE 
DEVELOPMENTS AND SUSTAINABLE RETURNS

C A P A B I L I T I E S

 KPIs

 LAN D &  P L
IN A QU A LIT
D BAN K

N
A
L

A
T
N
I
A
M

A N N I N G

DESIG

N & T

E

Y

C

H

N

I

C

A

L

 Q

U

  P

A

R

L
I

T

O

D

Y

U

P

C

R

E

O

A

D
U
C
T

L O N G - T E R M 
S U S TA I N A B L E 
VA L U E

G   
INDUSTRY L E A D I N
  S
T I N
ALES AND MA R K E

G   

R
E
L
A
T

I

O
N

S

H

I

P

S

S

U

S

T

AIN

A

  SALES & MARK E T I N G  
BILITY 

R E L A T I O N S H I P S

Land & Planning
The quality and location of our land bank is 
fundamental to delivering sustainable and 
profitable growth. Our experienced land teams 
focus on the investment and promotion of 
strategic land together with shorter term 
opportunities where we can add value through 
our master planning and technical expertise.

R
I
S

K

Design & Technical
Good design is at the heart of 
sustainable development. Our 
design and technical teams 
pride themselves on creating 
well designed, attractive and 
practical homes within high 
quality living environments.

Build
Quality of build underpins  
our ability to deliver a quality 
home to our customers. Our 
efficient and cost effective 
build incorporates carefully 
researched, proven products, 
materials and technologies.

Sales & Marketing
We aim to make the 
homebuying process as 
personal, straightforward  
and enjoyable as possible for 
our customers. We aim to 
provide excellent customer 
service throughout.

M

A

N

A

G

E

M
E

N
T

O U R   S T R A T E G Y

D 
UIL
 B

V E R N A NCE    

O

  G

MAINTAIN  
A QUALITY  
LAND BANK

PRODUCE 
A QUALITY 
PRODUCT

INDUSTRY 
LEADING SALES  
& MARKETING

TRAINING  
FOR THE  
FUTURE

EXCELLENT 
CUSTOMER  
SERVICE

HIGH STANDARDS 
IN HEALTH & 
SAFETY

IMPROVE  
RETURNS

See our strategy  
on pages 8 to 9

Customers
Our customers are fundamental to our 
business and we take great care to research 
their needs, listen to their feedback and 
respond with new homes where every  
detail is carefully considered. This enables 
us to create high quality homes and  
engenders loyalty and referral.

Our People
Our people are at the heart of our  
business; we invest in attracting and  
retaining talented staff, providing career 
development, training and delivering 
succession planning for the future.

Our Suppliers & Subcontractors
We work closely with experienced  
suppliers and subcontractors to  
deliver quality products and workmanship 
and to maintain a strong supply chain.

SUSTAINABLE OUTCOMES

D E S I G N
housing that benefits people

C U S T O M E R S
changing the way people live

C O M M U N I T Y
and the communities in which 
they live

P E O P L E
developing skills & 
creating opportunities

E N V I R O N M E N T
focused on sustainable growth

KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
We have ten key performance indicators to help measure 
the performance of our business.

RISK MANAGEMENT
Our risk management framework provides a structured 
and consistent process for identifying, assessing and 
responding to risks.

GOVERNANCE
We remain committed to high standards of corporate 
governance. Our Main Board has a balance of Executive 
Directors and Non-Executive Directors.

SUSTAINABILITY
We aim to be a responsible, profitable business; reducing 
our negative effects and increasing our positive effects 
on both people and the environment.

See our KPIs on page 9 

Read more on pages 38 to 42 

Read more on pages 56 to 88 

Read more on pages 44 to 55 

6

7

Strategic ReportGovernance ReportFinancial StatementsRedrow plc Annual Report 2015Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Shareholder Information 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
O U R   S T R AT E G Y

DELIVERING A PREMIUM BRAND WITH A HIGH QUALITY PRODUCT FOR 
OUR CUSTOMERS AND GROWING RETURNS FOR OUR SHAREHOLDERS

STRATEGY

MEASURE*

2018 OBJECTIVES

KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

Performance

2015

2014

Comment

We are focused on using our expertise to acquire sufficient quality  
land in appropriate locations on competitive terms to deliver our  
growth objectives. Ensuring that we obtain current and forward land with 
suitable planning potential are fundamental in delivering our strategy.

Land bank years

• Maintain land bank

3.9 years 

4.0 years 

at c.4 years

Land bank maintained to support increasing 
legal completion numbers

Sales outlets

• Increase sales outlets

117

103

Outlets up 14%

We aim to deliver well designed, well built, attractive homes. We are 
continuing to develop our portfolio of brands to enable us to increasingly 
We have a clearly defined strategy, experienced personnel and the ability to 
deliver more choice for our customers in both product and location.
act quickly if required, enabling opportunities and returns to be optimised.

Private reservation rate

• Maintain an appropriate
balance in availability of
our portfolio of brands
in the right locations

0.68

0.70

Private reservation rate marginally down on 
prior year levels

MAINTAIN  
A QUALITY  
LAND BANK

PRODUCE 
A QUALITY 
PRODUCT

We continue to enhance our customers’ interaction throughout their home 
buying journey and beyond. Customer feedback, both formal and informal, 
We have a clearly defined strategy, experienced personnel and the ability to
is important in helping us evolve our offering to benefit future customers, 
act quickly if required, enabling opportunities and returns to be optimised.
from an enhanced online experience through an increased array of 
customer options to an improved handover experience.

INDUSTRY LEADING 
SALES & MARKETING

Revenue

• Revenue increasing

£1,150m

£864m

Revenue up 33%

to £1.6bn

Number of trainees

•  Maintain level of trainees

243

202

Trainee numbers up 20% and maintained at 
15% of an increased workforce

We are focused on developing the skills of our current team and ensuring 
we attract both experienced talent and new and enthusiastic young 
We have a clearly defined strategy, experienced personnel and the ability to 
people into our business to underpin our growth objectives. Our training 
act quickly if required, enabling opportunities and returns to be optimised.
centre, dedicated training team and innovative graduate and apprentice 
programmes play an important role in delivering our strategy.

Over the last year we have undertaken a fundamental review of this 
important aspect of our business. We will shortly be implementing 
We have a clearly defined strategy, experienced personnel and the ability to 
comprehensive improvements to our customer service to ensure we  
act quickly if required, enabling opportunities and returns to be optimised.
are well placed to deliver the best possible customer experience as our 
number of customers increases in line with our growth strategy.

Five star customer 
satisfaction rating

We are dedicated to maintaining the highest standards of health and 
safety as our business grows. We have expanded our own in-house 
We have a clearly defined strategy, experienced personnel and the ability to 
dedicated team of Health and Safety professionals to ensure that our 
act quickly if required, enabling opportunities and returns to be optimised.
teams on site are appropriately trained, supported and audited.

Accident incident 
rate by site

representing 15% of
increasing workforce

•  Maintain HBF five
star customer
satisfaction rating

•  Accident incident rate
by site maintained at
0.3 or below

5 star

5 star

Five star HBF customer satisfaction rating achieved 
for five consecutive years

0.23

0.37

38% improvement in accident incident rate

We have a clearly defined growth strategy, to increase revenue, profits  
and returns to shareholders by increasing outlets and legal completions 
over the medium term.

EPS

ROE

ROCE

• EPS increasing to 62p

• ROE of 25%

• ROCE of 21%

44.5p

26.4%

22.8%

28.6p

20.5%

18.0%

Up 56%

Up 29%

Up 27%

* Read Glossary on page 129 to see how we calculate our key performance indicators

9

TRAINING FOR  
THE FUTURE

EXCELLENT 
CUSTOMER  
SERVICE

HIGH STANDARDS 
IN HEALTH & 
SAFETY

IMPROVE  
RETURNS

8

Strategic ReportGovernance ReportFinancial StatementsRedrow plc Annual Report 2015Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Shareholder InformationO U R   M A R K E T S

Strategic Report Approval
The Strategic Report outlined on pages  
3 to 55 has been approved by the Board.

By order of the Board

Graham Cope
Company Secretary

7 September 2015

Our Markets
The housing market plays an important role in 
the UK economy with underlying demand for 
housing being fundamentally strong. 

approvals in the second quarter compared to 
the first quarter, with 66,000 approvals per 
month compared to 61,000 approvals per 
month. (Chart 3).

is being maintained by the continued high 
frequency of cash transactions, which 
accounted for nearly 37% of all property 
transactions in the last 12 months. 

Planning
The National Policy Planning Framework  
was published in March 2012 as part of the 
Government’s action to ensure the supply  
of housing in response to higher demand.  
The process was further streamlined in 2015 
with the newly consolidated Development 
Management Procedure Order, aiming to 
simplify and improve the planning process  
for all users of the system. 

The number of applications granted is at its 
highest level since 2008/09 and the approval 
rate has been maintained at the 13 year high 
achieved last year, again increasing the supply 
of residential land in the market. (Chart 1).

Mortgage Approvals
Mortgage approvals are a key indicator of  
the level of activity in the housing market. 
These remain significantly below 2007 levels 
(1,259,000 approvals in the calendar year),  
but are continuing to increase year on year. 
(Chart 2).

Seasonally adjusted figures for the first half 
of 2015 showed an increase in mortgage 

Housing Supply
NHBC new build starts increased by 1% in the 
year to June 2015, compared to the previous 
year, rising to 123,600. The number of private 
sector starts was 10.9% higher than in the 
previous year, which was offset by a 20.0% 
decrease in affordable sector starts. The HBF 
survey found that the biggest constraints to 
supply at June 2015 were planning delays, 
labour availability and labour cost, while 
problems with materials availability and 
prices have eased since June 2014.

These new start rates are still significantly 
below the growth the Government predicts – 
recent housing projections indicated that 
220,000 additional households will be formed 
each year up to 2022 per the Department for 
Communities and Local Government (DCLG). 
(Chart 4).

Residential Transactions
Residential transactions in England and Wales 
increased by 14% in the calendar year 2014 
compared to 2013, increasing to 1,101,000. 
This builds on the 15% increase that occurred 
in 2013. The continued increase in transactions 

UK average prices per the Nationwide House 
Price Index increased by 4.1% in the 12 months 
to June 2015, significantly down on the 11.5% 
increase observed in the 12 months to June 
2014. These price increases were again 
influenced by the London market, where 
average prices increased by 7.3% in the same 
period, a marked drop from the 25.8% increase 
shown in the period to June 2014. (Chart 5).

Help to Buy
In the March 2015 Budget, the Government 
announced the creation of the “Help to Buy: 
ISA scheme”. This scheme will be available to 
first time buyers purchasing either new build  
or second hand properties. The Government 
will provide £50 for every £200 saved to a 
maximum of £3,000, which will be paid 
following the purchase of a new home at a 
value of up to £250,000 outside London 
(£450,000 in London). 

The ISA accounts will be available through 
banks and building societies and are expected 
to be available from Autumn 2015.

Starter Homes Initiative
The Starter Homes Initiative was launched in 
February 2015 where young first time buyers, 
under the age of 40, can sign up for 100,000 
cut-price starter homes, with 20% off the 
asking price. The Government has introduced 
changes to the planning rules where builders 
would not be required to pay S106 
contributions on Starter Homes built on 
commercial and industrial land that is 
under-used or unviable at present. In  
return the new homes would be provided  
at a minimum 20% discount on market price. 

Social Housing 
In the 2015 Summer Budget, the Government 
introduced a reduction in rents in social 
housing of 1% a year for the next four years, 
beginning in April 2016. The aim of the cap  
is to force Housing Associations and Local 
Authorities to deliver efficiency savings, but 
the Office for Budgetary Responsibility has 
warned that this could lead to thousands of 
fewer affordable homes being built, due to  
the Housing Associations being unable to 
obtain the required funding based on the 
reduced rents.

MARKE T OPPORTUNITIES
H EL P   TO   B U Y   U P DAT E

The Help to Buy scheme has now been running since April 2013. DCLG figures show that in 
the two years to March 2015, c.47,000 properties were purchased using the equity loan 
scheme, with the majority of sales (82%) to first time buyers. The first 12 months of the 
scheme recorded c.19,000 properties purchased, with c.28,000 purchased in the second  
12 months, showing that the popularity of the scheme is increasing.

Redrow and Help to Buy
Redrow’s customers have been able to use the Help to Buy scheme to purchase their  
homes since its inception, with 82 legal completions using the scheme in the three months 
to June 2013, 1,023 in the year to June 2014 and 1,374 in the year to June 2015. This 
represents 40% of private legal completions in 2015, an increase on the 35% that took 
advantage of the scheme in 2014.

Chart 1

Chart 2

Chart 3

Chart 4

Chart 5

769

736

61

62

62

68

65

67

575

593

610

2015 – 360

2010 – 336

PLA N NIN G APPLIC ATIONS   
GR AN T ED TO  MARCH (‘000)

MORTGAG E APPROVALS 
C ALENDAR YEAR (‘000) 

MORTGAGE APPROVALS 201 5 
(SEAS ONALLY A DJUSTED) ( ‘00 0) 

10

11

12

13

14

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Source: Department for Communities and  
Local Government – District Level applications

Source: Bank of England, CML

Source: Bank of England, CML

40

35

30

25

20

15

10

5

0

Sep 12

Dec 12

Mar 13

Jun 13

Sep 13

Dec 13

Mar 14

Jun 14

Sep 14

Dec 14

Mar 15

Jun 15

UK Average
London Average

500

450

400

350

300

250

200

150

100

50

0

Q1 
2012

Q2 
2012

Q3 
2012

Q4 
2012

Q1 
2013

Q2 
2013

Q3 
2013

Q4 
2013

Q1 
2014

Q2 
2014

Q3 
2014

Q4 
2014

Q1 
2015

Q2 
2015

NH B C B U IL D  STA RT S 
( E NG LAND AND WALE S)  ( ‘0 00)

H OU SE PR ICE S   
NATI ONW IDE   H OUSE  PR ICE  INDE X (£’000 )

10

11

Strategic ReportGovernance ReportFinancial StatementsRedrow plc Annual Report 2015Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Shareholder InformationUnderstanding our customers’ needs

Heritage Collection homes are designed with both the dynamics of 
family life and the desire for a home with real kerb appeal in mind. 
Combining the best of traditional architecture and craftsmanship 
with high specification interiors, the Heritage Collection creates a 
place that our customers are proud to call home.

Delivering customer experience

Delivering customer experience

is excellent and so much better than the competitors. I would buy 
another one if we moved again. From the sales consultant to the 
site manager, everyone’s been fantastic – nothing is  

“The quality of the build and the fixtures and fittings  
too much trouble.”

Stephen Vickery 
Redrow customer at Davington Park, 
Faversham, Kent

different. They have character. It was great being able to choose 
the finish of the kitchen, the bathroom tiles and the fitted 
wardrobe in the master bedroom. It made a massive difference as 

“A lot of new builds look the same, but Redrow homes are 
it meant everything would go with my chosen colour scheme.”

Louisa Hayes 
Redrow customer at The Willows, 
East Leake, Nottinghamshire

Above: The Cambridge house type at Riverside View, Lancaster, Lancashire | Below(L): Kitchen from The Balmoral house type

12

13

PAGE TITLEStrategic ReportGovernance ReportFinancial StatementsRedrow plc Annual Report 2015Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Shareholder InformationStrategic Report

Governance Report

Financial Statements

Shareholder Information

Understanding our customers’ needs

The Premier range of the Heritage Collection of superb 
homes with impressive proportions and luxury  
specifications exceed the expectations of even  
the most demanding home buyer. 

Delivering customer experience 

Delivering customer experience

“Purchasing our Balmoral home in Horsforth is the best  

decision we ever made. I always wanted a house with kerb 
appeal and now we finally have one! The layout gives us so much 
space and is well planned to suit a modern lifestyle. Redrow 
includes so many things that other developers would class as 
extras. The quality of the fixtures and fittings is amazing.  

It’s our dream home.”

Rehna Khan 
Redrow customer at The Limes, Horsforth Vale, 
West Yorkshire

“We decided to look at Redrow’s Heritage homes after 

hearing great reviews and found them to be light, spacious and 
welcoming. Our Highgrove home has an impressive gallery 
landing and we love the beautiful large kitchen. The high quality 
of the build is evident throughout the house and the fittings  

are excellent.”

Andy Morgan 
 Redrow customer at St Denys Gate, 
Lisvane, Cardiff 

14

15

Above: The Bromley house type at Stretton Green, Stretton, Cheshire | Below: Interiors from The Highgrove house type 

Strategic ReportRedrow plc Annual Report 2015Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Understanding our customers’ needs

Inspired by the elegant formal townhouse residences and 
external spaces of the past, Redrow’s Regent Collection offers 
flexible, spacious interiors across multiple floors appropriate  
for a suburban environment.

Delivering customer experience 

Delivering customer experience

are contemporary in design whilst retaining a classic Georgian 
style. The bold external architecture is complemented by a 

“We love that Redrow’s Regent Collection homes  
luxurious, modern and flexible interior.”

Andrew Hawley 
Redrow customer at St Andrew’s Place at Southbank, 
 Newton Kyme, North Yorkshire

“A lot of new developments tend to look ultra-modern but the 

Regent Collection is very traditional with Georgian architectural 
influences. Inside, the rooms are very spacious and the 
specification is superb with quality materials used throughout. 
We enjoyed being able to choose the finish of the kitchen cabinets 

and work surfaces and the bathroom tiles.”

 Steve Kane 
Redrow customer at Ratio, Erith, Kent 

St Andrew’s Place, Newton Kyme, North Yorkshire

16

17

PAGE TITLEStrategic ReportGovernance ReportFinancial StatementsRedrow plc Annual Report 2015Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Shareholder InformationGovernance Report

Financial Statements

Shareholder Information

Understanding our customers’ needs

Abode by Redrow delivers open plan living, creating modern urban 
homes full of light and life. They offer a fresh, contemporary 
approach to home design for people who love apartment style 
sociability but want more space in and around their home. They  
are also ideally designed for more urban locations.

Delivering customer experience 

Delivering customer experience

“Before Abode we hadn’t been able to find anything that 

ticked all of our boxes; i.e. an attractive exterior, a high quality 
interior that makes the most of the space with funky and 
interesting decor and a garage. We also loved the wet rooms at 
Abode as they’re extremely spacious, in fact, I can’t see us ever 

going back to having a normal bathroom now.”

Michael Spray 
Redrow customer at Abode, Buckley, Flintshire

so the fresh look of Abode with the brick finish and grey tile  
roof was perfect. The contemporary open plan ground floor  
really suits us as there’s a well equipped kitchen and a large  

“We didn’t want anything flamboyant or old fashioned  
living space.”

Andy Overton 
Redrow customer at Abode, Leegomery, Shropshire

18

19

Above: Abode at Buckley, Flintshire | Below: Abode at St. Neots, Cambridgeshire

Strategic ReportGovernance ReportFinancial StatementsRedrow plc Annual Report 2015Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Shareholder InformationUnderstanding our customers’ needs

Our bespoke collection allows Redrow to design unique homes 
within unique locations, from wonderful imaginative lakeside 
homes with private jetties, to magnificent coastal apartments 
with breathtaking balcony views, these exquisite developments 
offer something very special. 

Delivering customer experience 

Delivering customer experience

in the kitchen. It’s incredibly stylish and spacious and we love 
the fact that it’s open plan. The whole house has been cleverly 
designed and we love the basement too with its fabulous  

“We love the whole house but we seem to spend all of our time 
cinema room.”

 Jacqui Bond 
Redrow customer at Lytham Quays, 
Lytham, Lancashire

“Every day we wake up and think how lucky are we to live in 

such a lovely home. When friends and family visit they all say 
‘wow’, because it’s a very modern building and we have gone very 
modern with our choices. Our old house was 200 years old! Tony 
worked as a builder for 50 years and he was quite taken aback by 

the quality.”

 Peggy Venn
Redrow customer at Lymington Shores, 
Lymington, Hampshire

Lymington Shores, Lymington, Hampshire

20

21

PAGE TITLEStrategic ReportGovernance ReportFinancial StatementsRedrow plc Annual Report 2015Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Shareholder InformationGovernance Report

Financial Statements

Shareholder Information

Understanding our customers’ needs

Redrow understand the demand for quality homes without 
compromise in some of the most exclusive and sought after 
locations in and around the city. These exceptional residences 
are a reflection of our craftsmanship and innovation.

Delivering customer experience 

Delivering customer experience

“The design of the apartment is really well thought out. The 

building looks like a sailing ship, with beautiful balconies that 
overlook the river and lovely big windows that let lots of light in. 
We’ve got lovely yet practical wooden floors and granite surfaces 
throughout the home, while the bathrooms are just stunning.  
I like the gardens too. In all, I think it’s a fantastic development,  

in a beautiful spot.”

Victoria Barlow  
Redrow customer at Kingston Riverside, 
Kingston upon Thames, Greater London

“We picked Kingston Riverside over several new-build 

developments because of the design and location. A favourite 
feature is the beautifully landscaped communal roof garden, 
which uniquely links the two buildings of the development. With 
its stunning views over the River Thames and peaceful 

atmosphere, it provides the perfect place to spend time.”

 Alesja Bojarchuk and Dimitry Volos 
Redrow customers at Kingston Riverside, 
Kingston upon Thames, Greater London

22

23

Above and below left: Amberley Waterfront, Little Venice, London

Strategic ReportRedrow plc Annual Report 2015Redrow plc Annual Report 2015C H A I R M A N ’ S   S TAT E M E N T

IT GIVES ME GREAT PLEASURE TO REPORT 
STRONG GROWTH FOR REDROW

Steve Morgan
Chairman

At a time when the UK needs a substantial 
increase in home building, it gives me great 
pleasure to report strong growth for Redrow. 
Turnover comfortably exceeded £1bn for the 
first time and the number of new homes 
completed rose to 4,022, a 12% increase over 
last year and 42% increase over 2013.

Financial Results
Group turnover rose 33% to a record £1.15bn 
(2014: £864m) for the financial year. Whilst 
this included £65m of turnover from the sale of 
commercial property, freehold reversions and 
land, our core housing turnover was itself up 
26% at £1,085m (2014: £861m). This was due 
to a 12% rise in legal completions to 4,022 
(2014: 3,597) and a 13% rise in average selling 
price to £269,800 (2014: £239,500).

Gross margin improved from 21.7% to 23.8%,  
as 88% of our completions came from sites 
purchased post downturn with normal margins 
and as house price inflation exceeded build cost 
inflation, particularly in the south of England.

Operating profit was 54% higher at £213m 
(2014: £138m). This equates to an operating 
margin of 18.5% (2014: 15.9%), exceeding our 
2017 target of 18% two years early.

Operating expenses again increased in absolute 
terms as we continue to invest in growing the 
business and opening new divisions. However, 
as a percentage of turnover, they have further 
reduced from 5.8% in 2014 to 5.3% in 2015. 

We expect to maintain overheads at between 
5% and 5.5% of turnover going forward.

Pre-tax profits were up 53% to a record £204m 
(2014: £133m).

Net assets increased by 22% to £849m (2014: 
£696m) and Capital Employed rose 16% to 
£1,003m (2014: £868m). Return on Capital 
Employed improved from 18% to 22.8%, 
again beating our 2017 target of 20% two 
years early, and Return on Equity rose from 
20.5% to 26.4%.

We continue to invest significantly in land and 
work in progress. We have increasingly 
negotiated deferred terms on many of our land 
purchases and have also purchased more land 
on a subject to planning basis. This, together 
with our strong operating cash generation, has 
enabled us to reduce our net debt to £154m at 
the end of the financial year, giving gearing of 
18.1% (2014: 24.8%). We expect net debt to 
increase in the current year with ongoing 
investment in inventory.

Given the excellent financial performance of the 
business this year, whilst we continue to invest 
in growth, the Board is proposing an increase  
in the final dividend to 4p per share (2014: 2p), 
making 6p per share for the full year. Subject  
to shareholder approval at the Annual General 
Meeting, this will be paid on 13 November 2015 
to shareholders on the register at the close of 
business on 25 September 2015.

Market
Demand for new homes has been strong 
throughout the year, although there were 
the normal seasonal variations.

The Government’s Help to Buy scheme remains 
a major driver for the industry to increase 
output and in this financial year 1,374 (40%) of 
our private legal completions utilised the Help 
to Buy scheme, up from 1,023 (35%) last year.

Mortgage availability and mortgage rates 
continue to improve, whilst the Mortgage 
Market Review rules appear to be delivering 
more prudent lending.

The sales rate for the last financial year was 
robust at 0.68 per week, albeit slightly lower 
than the peak of 0.70 in the 2014 financial 
year, when Help to Buy had its initial impact. 
As I have previously stated, we expect growth 
in the business in the future to come from 
increasing outlets, rather than sales rate. To 
that end, I am pleased to report that at the 
end of June 2015 we were operating from  
117 outlets, 14% more than June 2014 when 
there were 103.

The total value of private reservations secured 
in the year amounted to £1.1bn, including our 
Joint Venture (JV) site at Croydon, an increase 
of 5% over the previous year. All regions 
performed well and our order book at the end 
of June was a record £565m (including our JV 
site), an increase of 13% over last year.

Sir Michael chaired the Lyons Housing 
Commission to produce a road map for 
increasing house building in this country.  
Prior to this, following a long and distinguished 
career in local government, Sir Michael was 
Chairman of the BBC.

The continued growth and success of the 
Redrow business has been achieved through 
the hard work and commitment of our people. 
I would like to thank them for their efforts 
and continued support in delivering our 
strategic objectives.

Current Trading and Outlook
Assisted by Help to Buy, demand for new 
homes continues to be strong and indeed, this 
strength in the market is reflected across the 
country. Redrow is committed to continued 
growth and to contribute to increasing the 
number of new homes built. 

We have a strong pipeline of attractive sites in 
excellent locations and a high quality industry 
leading product. We have entered the year with 
a record order book and reservations to date 
are running 5% ahead of last year at 0.68 sales 
per outlet per week. We have secured 820 
(2014: 640) private reservations in the first  
10 weeks, some 28% ahead of last year.

Redrow is in great shape and I am looking 
forward to another year of significant progress.

Steve Morgan
Chairman

7 September 2015

Last year I reported that due to the roll out  
of the Regent Collection and Abode, together 
with apartment schemes in and around 
London, we expected the proportion of 
turnover accounted for by our primary brand, 
the Heritage Collection, to reduce over time  
to 70%. In 2015 the Heritage Collection 
accounted for 76% (2014: 77%) of private 
turnover. The successful roll out of the Regent 
Collection continues and it now represents 4% 
of private turnover (2014: 1.6%). Around 20% 
of turnover is derived from bespoke schemes 
and we now have a number of Abode 
developments under construction.

Land and Planning
During the year we secured 5,892 new plots, of 
which 1,975 were converted from our forward 
land bank. At June 2015 our current land bank 
totalled 18,216 plots, a 9% increase on the 
previous year. The average plot cost has 
increased to £70,000 (2014: £63,000), primarily 
as a result of a change in geographical mix of 
the land bank, with over 50% of plots being in 
the south of England compared to 44% in June 
2014. This plot cost equates to 23.5% of our 
current average selling price, broadly in line 
with previous years. The percentage of 
provisioned land in the land bank has now 
reduced to 2%. By June 2017 it will be zero.

The Local Plan process has noticeably improved 
since the introduction of the NPPF; however, 
Local Plans are still taking far too long in many 
parts of the country. We welcome the 
Government’s ‘Fixing the Foundations’ 
initiative aimed at pushing Local Authorities 
into taking their housing delivery 
responsibilities seriously. 

Converting forward land holdings into new 
sites remains a key driver for the industry.  
Last year there was a noticeable increase in  
the number of outline planning approvals. 
However, gaining reserved matters and 
detailed planning consents is still taking far too 
long. Increasing housing supply in the UK is 
dependent on increasing the number of outlets; 
yet, despite the increase in headline planning 

consents, the number of outlets in the industry 
has barely grown. This situation will not 
improve until the burden of red tape associated 
with needless planning reports and conditions 
has been removed. 

We welcome the principle of the Government’s 
Starter Homes Initiative and eagerly await the 
details of how this will be delivered. Getting 
first time buyers and young people onto the 
housing ladder is fundamental to the health  
of the owner-occupier market.

People
As the business continues to grow we have 
again expanded our workforce significantly. In 
the last year we have added over 300 direct 
jobs (2014: 232) across all disciplines, an 
increase of 23%. Indeed, in the six years since I 
returned to the business in 2009, the number 
of people directly employed has increased by 
999 to 1,651. The number is, of course, very 
substantially higher when indirect jobs from 
our subcontractors and suppliers are added. 
The new homes industry continues to create 
significant economic growth for the benefit of 
all our stakeholders and the whole economy.

As has been widely reported, one of the biggest 
constraints to growth for the housebuilding 
industry is the shortage of skilled labour. 
Redrow continues to take a lead role in 
developing the next generation of workers at 
all levels. This year we have had a record intake 
of new recruits; 83 apprentices, 28 graduates 
and 32 specialist functional trainees. We are 
constantly creating new ideas to develop skills; 
for example we have introduced, in partnership 
with Glyndŵr University, a Higher 
Apprenticeship scheme for engineers and 
designers which starts with a BTEC Diploma 
and can lead to a full degree. In total, 250 
direct employees are trainees in various 
disciplines – at 15% of our workforce, this is 
the highest ratio in the home building industry.

I am delighted to welcome Sir Michael Lyons  
as a Non-Executive Director, who joined the 
Board with effect from 6 January 2015. In 2014 

24

25

Strategic ReportGovernance ReportFinancial StatementsRedrow plc Annual Report 2015Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Shareholder InformationO P E R AT I N G   R E V I E W

I AM DELIGHTED TO REPORT A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN  
TURNOVER AND PRE-TAX PROFITS, BOTH A RECORD FOR THE GROUP

John Tutte
Group Chief Executive

unfounded and the unequivocal outcome 
has brought further stability to the market, 
particularly with the announcement that Help 
to Buy in England is to be extended to 2020. 
Sadly the Welsh Assembly has yet to make such 
a commitment which is affecting the industry’s 
confidence to invest for the future.

Wales aside, the prospects for the housing 
market elsewhere are encouraging. The 
underlying improvement in the economy 
coupled with a competitive mortgage market 
means more people can afford to buy their first 
home or trade up, and a more active housing 
market is also allowing many to trade down  
as a lifestyle choice. The key to meeting the 
increase in demand and tackling the severe 
housing shortage hinges upon bringing more 
sites through the planning system and 
addressing the skills shortage.

Managing Increased Demand
The last government did a lot to improve the 
planning system and the new administration’s 
recently published productivity plan –‘Fixing 
the foundations: creating a more prosperous 
nation’, sets out a clear intention and 
determination to build more homes that 
people can afford. Whilst a well communicated 
policy at government level is essential to 
building more homes, ultimately delivery is 
very much in the hands of local authorities 
where all too often planning is stifled by local 
politics, a lack of resources and unnecessary 
bureaucracy. To materially increase output 
these fundamental issues have to be addressed.

We try hard to overcome these planning 
obstacles by consulting with local communities 
and working closely with planning 
departments. Indeed, at Maidenhead, where 
Harrow Estates recently achieved planning 
permission for 271 new homes on a brownfield 
site released from the greenbelt, we were 
complimented by the planning committee  
on our collaborative approach.

Tackling the industry’s skills shortage has been a 
priority for us in recent years. We have annually 
increased our intake of trainees and apprentices 
and now employ c.250 young people on 
structured training programmes across the 
business. We also continue to develop our 
people at all levels and last year we completed 
3,859 days of training, a 30% increase: much of 
this was carried out at our dedicated training 
centre or remotely through e-learning. We 
have extended our graduate programme and 
introduced a Higher Apprenticeship scheme for 
engineers and designers in partnership with 
Glyndŵr University. For the second year running 
we have been listed as a Top 100 Apprenticeship 
Employer in the National Apprenticeship Service 
awards. It is very satisfying that our training and 
career development programmes are helping to 
deliver our future managers and leaders with 
over half of our annual Director appointments 
coming from internal promotions.

Notwithstanding our commitment to tackling 
the skills shortage, we continue to experience 
trade shortages in some parts of the country 
and most acutely in new operating areas where 

The Group has reported an excellent financial 
performance for the year. Total completions 
exceeded 4,000 with private sales increasing  
by 16% in the year. Turnover was at record 
levels with private revenues above £1bn for  
the first time in the Group’s history.

Central to the Group’s strategy is the quality  
of its product, but fundamental to these strong 
results is the dedication and expertise of the 
people we employ across the business. A team 
of people that has grown by over 20% in the 
past year with a significant proportion of those 
new recruits being young people taking their 
first career steps. We now employ over 1,650 
people of which 15% are on structured training 
programmes including 130 apprentices. And it 
is very reassuring to know that our people rate 
working for us so highly: in our most recent 
employee survey, 97% of those that responded 
said they enjoy the work they do for Redrow 
and 95% think we are a good employer. 

The Market
The early months of the financial year were 
tougher by comparison to the summer of 2013 
that was buoyed by the introduction of the 
Government’s Help to Buy scheme in the 
Spring of that year. Help to Buy continues to  
be an attractive incentive for our buyers and 
accounted for around 40% of reservations in 
the year with the largest take-up being those 
buying their first home.

As the year progressed the market improved 
with both sales rates and prices lifting. Concerns 
over the impact of the election were largely 

26

we need to establish a base of subcontractors 
that can meet our demanding standards. As a 
consequence we have faced build delays that 
inevitably have a knock-on effect to customer 
satisfaction. We have also seen build costs 
increase during the year. Material prices have 
stabilised but labour costs, particularly for those 
trades in short supply, have risen substantially: 
we estimate that overall build costs have 
increased by in excess of 5% over the past year 
and we anticipate this trend will continue for 
sometime to come. We do however expect any 
build cost increases will be more than offset  
by modest house price inflation.

It was very pleasing to once again achieve a 
five star rating in the annual HBF Customer 
Satisfaction Awards. However balancing the 
need to deliver on time against rising customer 
expectations means that maintaining a 90%  
or better rating is becoming more challenging. 
To address this we have invested heavily in 
customer service over the past year increasing 
both the size and quality of our teams in 
readiness to launch our Customer First 

initiative. Customer First is being rolled-out 
across the business throughout financial year 
2016. It more closely engages with customers 
at an early stage with managers dedicated to 
providing a high level of service supported by 
the latest hand-held technology. Customer 
First will complement Redrow’s reputation for 
delivering well designed quality homes with 
industry leading customer service.

On the subject of quality, for the second time 
in the last three years, a Redrow Site Manager 
was the supreme winner for the large builder 
category in the NHBC Pride in the Job Awards. 
Rob Summers, our Site Manager at Cwm Calon 
in South Wales, was the eventual winner with 
Paul Greenaway our Site Manager at The 
Harringtons in Exeter also reaching the final. 
This year we have been awarded a record  
18 Pride in the Job Awards.

Building Responsibly and Sustainably
As well as ensuring we deliver homes built to 
high standards, we are also conscious of the 
need to build responsibly and sustainably. 

STR ATEGY IN ACTION

MAINTAIN A  QUALIT Y L AND BANK 
L A N D   ACQ U I S I T I O N ,   C A D D I N G TO N ,   B ED F O R DS H I R E

MAINTAIN  
A QUALITY  
LAND BANK

Redrow acquired a former test track and 
storage centre from General Motors in 
December 2014. The 59 acre brownfield site 
situated within the Bedfordshire Green Belt 
has an outline planning permission for the 
development of up to 325 homes and a 
community centre.

More than 30 acres of the site will be  
given over to open space and woodland 
with the remaining area creating a leafy 
and green setting for homes from  
Redrow’s Heritage Collection.

The innovative part of the development 
plan is for 46 affordable homes to be 
provided at no cost to a community trust 
in perpetuity. The rental income from 
these homes will be used to fund a local 
bus service and other facilities which will 
benefit residents of the development and 
the neighbouring community.

Our design team are finalising details for 
the development with work scheduled to 
start later this year.

Last year we increased build output by over 
20% but despite this, we managed to reduce 
our notifiable accidents per site from 0.37 in 
2014 to 0.23 in 2015. We were also successful 
in the annual NHBC Safety Awards with three 
of our Site Managers, from a total of 29 across 
the country, being highly commended.

Our developments continue to reduce their 
impact upon the environment and make 
increasing contributions to local communities. 
Our carbon emissions are down and 56%  
of the homes we built last year contained 
recycling facilities and 57% were on 
‘brownfield’ sites. We almost doubled  
the amount of public open space we created 
to 209 hectares and committed £128m of 
funds to local communities. 

Product at the Centre of Divisional Growth
Our product differentiates us from our major 
competitors. Throughout our developments  
we focus on delivering homes that are both 
attractive and functional. We have an 
unwavering attention to detail and a 
programme of continuous improvement  
that ensures our designs respond to changing 
trends and customer demands. My Redrow is 
also reinforcing our commitment to provide 
customers with greater choice to tailor their 
homes to meet their needs: last year we sold 
£10m of extras to customers. 

The Heritage Collection accounts for around 
80% of private volumes and underpins the 
Group’s enviable reputation for designing and 
building high quality well-planned homes.  
We have extended the range during the year  
to include more house types aimed at those 
looking to trade down.

The Regent Collection with its traditional 
elevations and modern interiors is proving 
popular amongst buyers looking to live in 
higher density housing in urban environments. 
Abode is our contemporary version of Regent 
sharing similar footprints but with simple 
modern elevations and open plan living space. 
The number of Regent and Abode outlets is 
expected to steadily increase.

We are able to apply the same attention to 
detail we have on our standard ranges to 
bespoke solutions. Most of these developments 
are apartment schemes, particularly in London, 
although in places such as South Cerney in the 
Cotswolds, we have created one-off designs for 
lakeside living.

Aerial photograph of Caddington, Bedfordshire site

27

Strategic ReportGovernance ReportFinancial StatementsRedrow plc Annual Report 2015Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Shareholder InformationO P E R AT I N G   R E V I E W   C O N T I N U E D

The number of private apartments completed 
during the year increased by 24% and 
represented 14.8% of private sales compared 
to 13.9% last year. Social housing, as a 
consequence of the timing of delivery, 
reduced from 17.6% in 2014 to 14.2% in 2015. 
Although moving forward this position will  
be reversed and social housing is set to be a 
larger proportion of output, the government’s 
announcement regarding year-on-year 

reductions in social rents for the duration 
of this parliament, has created a hiatus  
that will affect the delivery of social  
housing in the short term. 

Our nationwide reputation for designing and 
building quality homes on well-planned sites 
has supported our divisional growth. The 
Heritage Collection in particular has been  
the bedrock for growth in our new regional 

divisions. We continue to expand and open  
a new division each year – in 2014 we  
established a West Country division based in 
Exeter that has made a significant contribution 
in the year and we recently split our business in 
the East to create divisions north and south of 
the Thames. We have also recently announced 
a reorganisation of our London operation to 
meet our planned growth in the fastest 
growing area in the country.

STR ATEGY IN ACTION

HOUSE T YPE DESIGN 
P RO D U C E   A   Q UA L I T Y   P RO D U C T

PRODUCE  
A QUALITY 
PRODUCT

Since the launch of the Arts & Crafts influenced Heritage Collection  
in 2010 we have further developed our housing portfolio. We have 
introduced large houses with an enhanced specification including our 
Premier house types and our Regent Collection of elegant townhouses.

We have also thought outside the box to develop our Abode 
Collection of homes, which bring modern apartment-style living 
to a two-storey house type environment. 

We have worked closely with our kitchen designers to achieve 
handle-less kitchen units presented as ‘floating’ island and peninsular 
units; a contemporary and desirable feature. Open plan layouts 
maximise space and light, giving customers the ability to use their 
homes as they wish. Homes also have the advantage of underfloor 
heating and wet rooms for a quality spacious feel.

London
London will now operate as a region in its  
own right. The new region will cover all London 
boroughs. It will bring together the expertise 
and skills we have amassed developing sites in 
the Capital and allow us to undertake more of 
our own construction with less reliance upon 
main contractors. Initially there will be two 
divisions with capacity to add a third at some 
point in the future. 

The Colindale Gardens division will focus 
entirely on delivering this highly important 
development for the Group. We recently 
received a resolution to grant planning for 
2,900 new homes and up to 100,000 sq.ft.  
of commercial space. Under the planning 
agreement we will be providing healthcare 
and nursery facilities, land for a new school, 
a significant contribution to upgrade 
Colindale tube station and 4 hectares of 
public open space and gardens. Colindale 
Gardens has a gross development value of 
over £1bn and is expected to take ten years 
to build. 

The Greater London division will oversee  
our other sites across the Capital including 
our Joint Venture in Croydon.

The new region will have a number of 
centralised functions including land buying, 
sales and marketing, customer service  
and finance.

STR ATEGY IN ACTION

MY REDROW 
I N D US T RY   L E A D I N G   S A L E S   A N D   M A R K E T I N G

INDUSTRY  
LEADING SALES  
& MARKETING

My Redrow, our direct internet channel to our customers, has grown from strength to 
strength since launching in April 2013. It continues to lead the way in the housebuilding 
industry, providing our customers with support from their initial search to moving into  
their new Redrow home.

It also enables them to personalise their home by choosing from an extensive range of 
extras and upgrades for their home, which can all be ordered online.

Now with c.27,000 members and growing by an average of 1,000 new members per  
month, My Redrow was substantially upgraded and moved to a faster operating platform 
in March 2015.

The re-vamped My Redrow includes new features to further improve the online 
customer experience.

We worked closely with a number of existing My Redrow members who were keen to 
support us and provided feedback both on the prototype and first release beta test 
platform. Their involvement and support has been invaluable in providing a customer 
centric solution.

Since the re-launch we’ve had a fantastic response from our customers, who are telling  
us how much easier the new design is to use. We’ve seen this culminate in a record month 
in April for sales of optional extras totalling £1.4 million. 

My Redrow will continue to evolve and additional enhancements are already in planning.

Abode at Buckley, Flintshire

28

Blake Tower, The Barbican, London

Customer using My Redrow, our direct internet channel 

29

Strategic ReportGovernance ReportFinancial StatementsRedrow plc Annual Report 2015Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Shareholder InformationO P E R AT I N G   R E V I E W   C O N T I N U E D

STR ATEGY IN ACTION

COMMERCIAL  AND TECHNIC AL   APPRENTICES 
T R A I N I N G   F O R   T H E   FU T U R E

TRAINING  
FOR THE 
FUTURE

Two new apprentice programmes are helping to ensure a steady  
flow of talented, enthusiastic and suitably skilled young people into 
the business. 

We’ve developed a two year Commercial Apprenticeship with Coleg 
Cambria and the Chartered Surveyors Trust. Apprentices are working 
towards their BTEC Diploma in Construction and the Built Environment 
and NVQ Level 3 in Quantity Surveying, with training taking place on a 
block release basis at our UK headquarters or national training centre. 

Each apprentice is based in the commercial team at one of our 
Divisional offices, where they learn all aspects of quantity surveying, 
e.g. estimating project costs, tendering, purchasing and ensuring that
developments are delivered within budget. Following completion of

the apprentice programme there is the opportunity to go on to 
complete a fully accredited RICS degree. 

Our Technical Apprentice programme, developed with Coleg Cambria 
and Glyndŵr University, combines a formal learning programme 
delivered in-house and ‘on the job’ practical experience. The course 
covers designing new housing developments, including planning and 
drawing site layouts, plus engineering design for associated roads, 
sewers and utilities. Apprentices complete a BTEC Diploma in 
Construction and the Built Environment and an NVQ in either Civil 
Engineering or Architectural Technology. On completing their 
apprenticeship they can progress to a fully accredited degree at 
Glyndŵr University.

To preserve our growth, last year we acquired 
just under 6,000 plots across 52 sites and, 
after taking into account legal completions, 
land sales and replans, our owned and 
contracted land bank increased by nearly 
1,500 plots to 18,216.

The Forward Land portfolio continues to make 
an important contribution to the owned land 
bank. Last year we pulled-through 1,975 plots 
across 22 sites and we expect 2016 will be 
particularly strong with over 3,800 plots at 

Colindale and Woodford in Stockport on-track 
to contribute. We also added over 1,300 plots 
to the Forward Land bank after taking into 
account transfers and adjustments as a result 
of our regular strategic review. With some 
uncertainty over emerging local planning 
policies, we have taken a particularly cautious 
view on sites within the ‘greenbelt’.

The geographical spread of the land bank is 
trending towards the south as we focus on 
opening more outlets and divisions in this 

part of the country: over half the owned  
and contracted land bank is now in the South 
and Greater London and this is expected to 
increase further with sites such as Colindale 
coming through.

Despite a strengthening housing market, we 
have found plenty of land opportunities within 
the areas we operate that can be acquired on 
terms that meet our hurdle rates and we 
expect this to continue to be the case. 

STR ATEGY IN ACTION

CUSTOMER FIR ST
E XC EL L EN T   C US TO M ER   S ERV I C E

EXCELLENT  
CUSTOMER  
SERVICE

Over the last year, we sold over 4,000 homes. Throughout that time 
we’ve been measuring how happy our customers are and how likely 
they are to recommend us to other people.

With more importance being placed on good customer service  
than ever before, we’ve been working on a company-wide customer 
service strategy, aptly named ‘Customer First’. We’re committed  
to making continuous improvements in customer service and we 
are targeting an increase in our Net Promoter Score (NPS) over the 
course of the year.

Over the last 12 months we have implemented a number of positive 
changes across the business, including;

• An organisational restructure of all customer service departments

•

•

•

 New handover policies for finished homes allowing more
time for any remedial works

 A re-engineered customer journey, proactively introducing
the customer service team at the earliest opportunity and
developing relationships

 Updates to the website and bespoke customer service
management software

• Brand new web and app platforms to support our customers

Over the next few months we will finish rolling out the most 
comprehensive improvements to customer service that Redrow  
has ever seen, helping to ensure we give our customers the best 
experience possible.

Technical Apprentices attended a week’s block release BTEC Level 3 Diploma course, delivered by Coleg Cambria, at Redrow’s head office, St David’s Park

The Central London market softened during 
the year in response to the threat of mansion 
tax, increases in Stamp Duty Land Tax and 
uncertainties in the wider global economy.  
As a consequence, we curtailed our land 
buying in the so called ‘super prime’ areas  
and focused more on sites in the outer London 
boroughs where demand is strong and selling 
prices remain affordable for those that work 
in the Capital.

Investing to Grow Outlets
As our sales rates and average selling prices 
reach optimal levels, our future growth will rely 
largely on increasing the number of outlets 
from which we operate and expanding our 
divisional structure. 

Last year we opened 54 new outlets, and after 
taking into account the closure of 40, we 
ended the year on 117 active outlets: a net 

increase of 14. In financial year 2016 we 
expect to open around 55 new outlets,  
after taking into account a higher number  
of closures weighted to the second-half, we  
are forecasting to end the year on 128 outlets 
and maintain our strong track record of 
increasing outlets year-on-year: by the end  
of this financial year our outlets will have 
grown by over 50% since 2012.

Our newly launched iPad application – Redrow Fine Tune

30

31

Strategic ReportGovernance ReportFinancial StatementsRedrow plc Annual Report 2015Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Shareholder InformationO P E R AT I N G   R E V I E W   C O N T I N U E D

STR ATEGY IN ACTION

HE ALTH &  SAFE T Y INITIATIVES 
H I G H   S TA N DA R DS   I N   H E A LT H   &   S A FE T Y

HIGH STANDARDS  
IN HEALTH  
& SAFETY

Redrow has launched a year-long campaign to raise awareness of four hazards  
which adversely affect the health of thousands of construction workers every year: 

• Dust and respiratory diseases

• Hand Arm Vibration

• Skin problems including dermatitis and skin cancer

• Noise

Research shows that although there has been a substantial reduction in the number of  
fatal injuries in the construction industry, there were still an estimated 76,000 cases of 
work-related ill health last year, including 31,000 new cases identified in the year.

Across the industry approximately 2.3 million working days were lost – 1.7 million of them 
due to ill health. The combined cost to society of injuries and new cases of ill health is more 
than £1.1 billion per year; and the effects can be devastating for individuals and their 
families in terms of quality of life and financial security. 

Nine divisional roadshows were delivered across the country in May and June to raise 
awareness among Redrow contractors and their employees of the hazards associated with 
inhalation of construction dusts and hand arm vibration syndrome, which can be caused by 
prolonged exposure to high frequency vibrating power tools. Attendees of these events 
were also shown various extraction equipment and HAVi meters that can be used to reduce 
dust exposure and monitor the time that their operatives are exposed to vibrating work 
equipment. These roadshow workshops were delivered by the Redrow Health and Safety 
team supported by Dave Arscott, National Technical Manager for Brandon Hire. 

Roadshows are being supported with fact sheets, posters and toolbox talks. 

Well Positioned for Future Growth
The outlook for the market is encouraging.  
We have an improving economy, a competitive 
mortgage market and an underlying strong 
demand for more homes.

Whilst there is still much to do to improve 
and speed-up the planning system, more 
consents are being granted and this is helping 
to ensure the land market remains benign and 
attractive. Our biggest challenge will be to 
overcome the planning and technical 
obstacles we face to close land deals  
and bring outlets on-stream sooner.

Last year for the first time we set three year 
targets. We have now updated those targets 
for 2018 and expect turnover to increase by 
40% to £1.6bn, operating margins to improve 
to 19% and return on capital employed to  
be in excess of 21% despite our ongoing 
investment in land and inventory to grow  
our outlets. We also set a target of 25% for 
return on equity.

As we continue to grow the number of outlets 
from which we operate we will inevitably 
increase the pressure on our teams and 
contractors to deliver. We can however draw 
comfort from our track record of recruiting, 
retaining and developing our people. We have  
a team of people that are proud to work for 
Redrow and understand and share our values  
to build a great product and deliver excellent 
customer service.

John Tutte
Group Chief Executive

7 September 2015

Contractors at one of Redrow’s Health & Safety workshop roadshows

32

The Worcester house type at Summerhill Park, Liverpool

33

Strategic ReportGovernance ReportFinancial StatementsRedrow plc Annual Report 2015Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Shareholder InformationFI N A N C I A L   R E V I E W

THE GROUP HAS EXCEEDED THE £200M PROFIT 
BEFORE TAX MILESTONE FOR THE FIRST TIME

Tax
The corporation tax charge for the year was 
£42m. The Group’s tax rate for 2015 was 
20.75% (2014: 22.50%). The normalised rate 
of tax for the year ending 30 June 2016 is 
projected to be 20% based on rates which  
are substantively enacted.

The Group paid £22m of corporation tax in the 
year (2014: £nil) in the normal quarterly pattern 
having now fully utilised the tax losses generated 
by downturn losses. Payments in the normal 
quarterly pattern will continue going forward.

Dividends
The Board has proposed a 2015 final dividend 
double that of last year at 4.0p per share which 
will be paid on 13 November 2015.

A final dividend of 2.0p per share in respect  
of the year ended June 2014 was paid in 
November 2014 (November 2013: 1.0p), and  
an interim dividend of 2.0p per share in respect 
of the year ended June 2015 was paid in  
May 2015 (May 2014: 1.0p), totalling £15m.

Returns
Net assets at 30 June 2015 were £849m (2014: 
£696m), a 22% increase. Capital employed at 
the same date was £1,003m (2014: £868m) an 
increase of 16%. Our return on capital employed 
increased in the year from 18.0% to 22.8%, again 
exceeding our 2017 target. Due to our judicious 
use of debt as well as equity to fund our growth, 
we were able to increase our return on equity by 
29% from 20.5% to 26.4%, one of the highest 
returns in the sector. Whilst we will need to 
increase our investment in inventory to achieve 
our growth targets we aim to deliver ROCE of at 
least 21% and ROE of 25% in 2018.

STR ATEGY IN ACTION

IMPROVE RE TURNS
B I S H O P S   CO U RT   D E V ELO P M EN T

IMPROVE 
RETURNS

Harrow Estates has a wealth of experience in land remediation and master planning  
and, by working closely with our Homes Divisions, together they bring synergies which 
deliver improved returns for Redrow as a whole. Our Bishops Court development is an 
example of this.

The Group acquired our Bishops Court site, 
a former quarry in Exeter, which had latterly 
been used for sand and concrete supplies 
and carried a nature conservation 
designation, in December 2011. The Homes 
Division and Harrow worked closely 
together to compile a detailed planning 
application which was submitted in March 
2012. A remediation strategy was 
developed by Harrow specifically designed 
with the layout and foundation solutions 
underpinning the detailed planning 
application in mind.

Planning for 190 homes was granted in April 
2013 allowing remediation works to begin 
on site controlled by Harrow. This left the 
Homes Division free to finalise their design 
work and section agreements to allow a 
start on site immediately after remediation 
was completed.

Working together they unlocked a land 
opportunity, delivered an efficient,  
cost effective remediation strategy and 
reduced the time from land purchase to 
the start of house build on site leading  
to improved returns.

Bishops Court, aerial view

Barbara Richmond
Group Finance Director

reversionary interest in our development at 
One Commercial Street, London, £8m from 
the sale of a number of freeholds of London 
developments and £10m from sundry  
land sales.

Gross profit increased by £86m in the year to 
£274m (2014: £188m) giving a gross margin of 
23.8% (2014: 21.7%). In addition to increased 
revenues this is due to the decrease in the 
proportion of our homes legal completions 
from provisioned land acquired before the 
downturn from 20% to 12% and house price 
inflation net of build cost inflation. 

We expect the proportion of provisioned plots 
in cost of sales to be zero by 2018.

As a consequence of this strong growth the 
Group generated an operating profit in the year 
of £213m (2014: £138m), a 54% increase. This 
represents an operating margin of 18.5% 
(2014: 15.9%) and means we have exceeded 
our 2017 target operating margin of 18%. We 
are now targeting an operating margin of 19% 
by 2018.

Net financing costs at £9m were £1m higher 
than the prior year due to increased imputed 
interest payable on deferred land creditors as 
we continue to invest in land opportunities and 
successfully negotiate deferred terms.

The record profit before tax of £204m (2014: 
£133m) delivered in the year produced a basic 
earnings per share up 57% at 44.5p (2014: 28.3p). 

Profitability
This year the Group again delivered record 
results with revenue of £1,150m (2014: 
£864m), exceeding the £1bn turnover 
milestone for the first time and profit before 
tax of £204m (2014: £133m), exceeding the 
£200m milestone for the first time.

Total Group revenue rose 33% to £1.15bn. 
Private homes revenue increased by 29% to 
£1,026m (2014: £798m) as a result of a 16% 
increase in private homes legal completions 
and a 10% increase in average selling price. 
Social homes revenue reduced by 6% to £59m 
as a result of timing differences on legal 
completions. In addition there was £65m of 
other revenue. This comprised £47m from the 
sale of all the commercial units and 

Chart 1

2015

2014

 North

 Central 

 South
  Greater 
London

 North

 Central 

 South
  Greater 
London

282
304
326

238
1,150

221
253
251

139
864

Chart 2

Homes
Other

65

1,085

3

861

5

600

12

467

Chart 3

39

Chart 4

0.2%

0.5%

18.5%

}

2.6%

Chart 5

ROCE
ROE

15.9%

0.8%

0.6%

0.5%

20

12

6

26.4

22.8

20.5

18.0

12.2

12.3

8.7

8.4

R E V E N U E   B Y   
G E O G R A P H Y   ( £ M )

R E V E N U E   ( £ M )

PROVISIONED PLOTS   
IN CO ST OF SALES (%)

12

13

14

15

13

14

15

16

2
17

2014

Provisioned 
Plot 
Reduction

Net HPI

Reduced 
Social

Margin on 
Other 
Revenue

Overhead

2015

12

12

13

13

14

14

15

15

OP E RATI N G  MARG I N B RI DG E  ( %)

ROCE &  ROE  (%)

34

35

Strategic ReportGovernance ReportFinancial StatementsRedrow plc Annual Report 2015Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Shareholder InformationFI N A N C I A L   R E V I E W   C O N T I N U E D

Inventories
Our investment in land increased by 27% in 
the year to £1,020m (2014: £802m). This 
produced an 8% increase in our land bank of 
plots owned with planning permission and also 
reflected investment in strategic sites, notably 
Colindale, London, Ebbsfleet in Kent and 
Woodford, South Manchester.

The land market remains stable with good 
quality opportunities available. Our owned plot 
cost has increased by £8,000 per plot to 
£68,000 at June 2015, 23% of the average 
selling price of private legal completions in the 
year (2014: 22%).

Our investment in work in progress increased 
by 35% in the year to £480m (2014: £355m). 
This reflected a continued increase in active 
outlets and further investment in newly 
acquired substantial developments and large 
apartment schemes in the South of England.

Our net realisable value provision on land and 
work in progress reduced by £20m to £28m in 
the year. Provisioned plots represented a 
minimal 2% of our owned land bank at June 
2015 (2014: 6%).

Land creditors increased by £108m to £266m 
at June 2015 as we continue to be successful in 
negotiating deferred terms with land vendors.

Receivables
Trade receivables decreased by £7m during the 
year to £29m (2014: £36m) with the receipt of 
£9m of deferred consideration from the 
disposal of our Scotland business which took 
place in June 2011. Other receivables increased 
by £2m to £23m due mainly to the timing of 
the recovery of VAT paid on land purchases.

Trade payables and accruals increased by  
£84m to £281m reflecting increased levels 
of production activity.

that our facilities remain aligned to our 
strategic and operational objectives and 
market conditions.

Cash flow and Net Debt
Net debt decreased by £18m to £154m at June 
2015 (2014: £172m) giving gearing of 18.1% at 
the year-end (2014: 24.8%). The small decrease 
in net debt reflects our success in delivering 
operating cash flow receipts capable of funding 
the growth in the business, supporting an 
increase in dividend payments and a return to 
corporation tax payments in the year. 

On 18 March 2015 we extended our Revolving 
Credit Facility of £350m and a £15m bilateral 
facility previously maturing in March 2018 to 
March 2020 on better financial terms. 

Our current banking syndicate comprises 
five banks and in addition to our committed 
facilities, Redrow also has further 
uncommitted bank facilities which are used 
to assist day to day cash management.

(ii) Interest rate risk

The Group is exposed to interest rate risk
as it borrows money at floating rates.
Redrow uses simple risk management
products, notably sterling denominated
interest rate swaps, as appropriate to
manage this risk. Such products are not
used for speculative or trading purposes.

Financing and Treasury Management
Financial management at Redrow is conducted 
centrally using policies approved by the Board.

Redrow regularly reviews its hedging
requirements. No hedging was undertaken
in the year.

Redrow is a UK based house builder and 
therefore the main focus of its financial risk 
management surrounds the management of 
liquidity and interest rate risk.

(i) Liquidity

The Group regularly prepares and reviews
its cash flow forecasts which are used to
manage liquidity risks in conjunction
with the maintenance of appropriate
committed banking facilities to ensure
adequate headroom.

Facilities are kept under regular review and
the Group maintains regular contact with
its banks and other financial institutions;
this ensures Redrow remains attuned to
new developments and opportunities and

Pensions
As at June 2015, the Group’s financial 
statements showed a £3m deficit (2014: £11m 
deficit) in respect of the defined benefits section 
of The Redrow Staff Pension Scheme (which 
closed to future accrual with effect from 
1 March 2012). The £8m decrease in the deficit 
is mainly due to improved returns on scheme 
assets in the year. Pension benefits are now 
provided via the Redrow Group Personal Pension 
Plan which is a type of defined contribution plan.

Barbara Richmond
Group Finance Director

7 September 2015

Chart 6

Chart 7

Plot cost in cost of sales as % ASP
Plot cost in current land bank as % ASP

24.5

25.1

22.0

22.0

22.3

23.4

23.5

20.9

12

12

13

13

14

14

15

15

PLOT  CO ST (%)

36

2015

2014

4,510
 North
 Central  4,395
8,188
 South
  Greater 
London

1,123
18,216

 North

 Central 

 South
  Greater 
London

4,639
4,635
6,094

1,356
16,724

CURRENT LAND BY   
GEOGRAPHY (NO. PLOTS)

Chart 8

Owned
Owned and Contracted

70

68

63

60

56

57

49

50

12

12

13

13

14

14

15

15

PLOT COSTS (£’000)

Cerney on the Water, South Cerney, Gloucestershire 

37

Strategic ReportGovernance ReportFinancial StatementsRedrow plc Annual Report 2015Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Shareholder InformationR I S K   M A N AG E M E N T   A N D   R I S K S

HOW WE MANAGE RISK

BOARD OVERSIGHT

Main Board

Audit Committee

Nomination Committee

Remuneration Committee

Sustainability Committee

OPERATIONAL COMMITTEES

Executive Committee

Our Risk Management Process
Once strategic and financial objectives have 
been set by the Main Board, principal risks are 
identified by the Executive Committee which 
could affect the Company’s ability to achieve 
those objectives.

The Risk Register is formulated from the 
principal risks and is updated on an annual 
basis to reflect any changes to the risk profile 
of the organisation.

Following the updates to the Risk Register and 
the subsequent approval obtained from the 
Audit Committee, actions to minimise and 
where possible eliminate those risks are 

incorporated into policies and procedures, 
monthly management meetings and weekly 
operational meetings.

Certain risks are mitigated through the risk 
being transferred contractually or through  
the insurance markets.

Our Risk Assessment Process
Analysis of the strategic objectives enables 
risks faced by the organisation to be identified. 
The top level risks each have an individual risk 
owner responsible for updating the importance 
of the risk in current market conditions and any 
changes required in the management of the 
risk on an annual basis.

The Risk Register is circulated to the  
divisional management teams for collation 
of their feedback as part of the annual risk 
review process.

The risk owners update the scoring of the 
relevant sections of the Risk Register to  
reflect any changes to the risk impact and 
probability. Internal controls over these risks 
are categorised into “prevent controls”  
or “detect controls”.

The Risk Register is reviewed by the Audit 
Committee to ensure the risks are appropriate 
to the business.

Divisional Boards

Functional Seminars

Team Meetings

OUR RISK ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT PROCESS

POLICIES FOR HIGHLIGHTING AND CONTROLLING RISK

Land Appraisal

Budgeting

Price & Sales Monitoring

Cost Reviews

PROCEDURES AND INTERNAL CONTROLS

Authorisation Processes

Business Process Reviews

Site Completion Reviews

Business Policies and Procedures

System Based Controls

PEOPLE AND CULTURE

Professionalism

Strong Communication

Qualified Personnel

Agree Strategic and Financial Objectives

Executive Board Establish Principal Risks

Assign Risks to Owners

Annual Review by Divisional Management Teams

Risks and Scoring Updated by Owners

Feedback to Risk Owners

Updated Risk Register Reviewed by Operational Finance Team

Executive Board Review and Sign-Off

Pride and Achievement

Interests Aligned with Shareholders

Commitment to Training

Audit Committee Review and Sign-Off

BUSINESS RISK

Update Risk Register

Update Policies and Procedures

Risks incorporated into Management and Operational Meetings

Activity

Action

38

39

Strategic ReportGovernance ReportFinancial StatementsRedrow plc Annual Report 2015Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Shareholder InformationR I S K   M A N AG E M E N T   A N D   R I S K S   C O N T I N U E D

Category

Risk 

Risk Owner

Key Controls and Mitigating Strategies

Risk Movement

Category

Risk 

Risk Owner

Key Controls and Mitigating Strategies

Risk Movement

Group Chief 
Executive

Close monitoring of, and proactive management 
response to, key indicators of the housing market.

Housing Market conditions
The conditions within the  
UK housing market are 
fundamental to Redrow’s 
business performance.

Improve 
Returns

Improve 
Returns

Improve 
Returns

Excellent 
Customer 
Service

Group Finance 
Director

Availability of  
mortgage finance
Lending criteria and deposit 
requirements for mortgages 
remain key issues in the 
current environment.

Liquidity and funding
The Group requires  
appropriate facilities for 
its short term liquidity and 
long term funding needs.

Group Finance 
Director

Customer service
The failure of our customer 
services may undermine 
Redrow’s ability to fulfil its 
business objectives.

Regional Chief 
Executive

Review of weekly sales.

Monitoring of competitor performance and 
incentives given.

Regular review and improvement of the  
product range in response to changes in 
market conditions.

Proactively engage with the Government, 
lenders and insurers to support the new and 
second hand housing market.

Support Government initiatives such as Help  
to Buy and Help to Buy “Mortgage Guarantee”.

Monitoring of consumer credit legislation.

Panel of New Build Mortgage Specialists utilised 
to provide an immediate update in respect of 
regulatory changes.

Bank facilities with appropriate covenants  
and headroom obtained. An extension to 
committed banking facilities has been  
obtained encompassing a reduction in margin.

Capital structure regularly reviewed.

Regular communication with investors 
and relationship banks.

Strong forecasting and budgeting process 
providing a clear view of future cash flows.

The new Customer First business processes are 
currently being introduced to further improve 
our customer experience.

Improved customer engagement through My 
Redrow section of our website to support our 
customers when purchasing a new home.

Ensure high quality design to deliver 
sustainable communities.

Maintain a 
Quality 
Land bank

Maintain a 
Quality 
Land bank

Produce a 
Quality 
Product

Improve 
Returns

Group Development 
Director

Clearly defined strategy and long term 
focus on forward land.

Close monitoring of market conditions by 
experienced management team.

Strong, experienced and knowledgeable land, 
planning and technical teams.

Utilisation of external lawyers with appropriate 
Professional Indemnity Insurance for larger  
site acquisitions.

Group Development 
Director

Close monitoring of planning environment 
by experienced management team.

Land procurement
The ability to purchase land 
suitable for our products and 
the timing of future land 
purchases are fundamental to 
the Group’s future performance.

Planning and  
regulatory environment
The ability to respond and 
adapt to the changing planning 
and regulatory environment 
is key to Redrow’s future 
business performance.

Local knowledge of divisional planning and 
technical teams.

Well prepared, high quality planning  
submissions addressing local concerns and 
demonstrating good design.

Additional controls have been introduced during 
the year to monitor the funding quality of the 
Housing Associations, with social housing quotes 
being signed off prior to land deals proceeding.

Design is an integral part of our business.

Focus on high build quality, with regular 
site visits being undertaken.

Product changes implemented during  
the year have improved our flexibility to 
planning changes.

The Regent Collection has been rolled out 
to provide exceptional kerb appeal and a 
distinctive lifestyle.

The Abode Collection has been introduced in  
the year to provide a contemporary alternative 
to the Regent Collection. 

Proactive management of software 
security updates.

Regular third party testing of the Group’s 
cyber security systems.

Quarterly internal audit procedures introduced 
during the year.

Group Design and 
Technical Director

Appropriateness of product
The failure to design and build 
a desirable product for our 
customers at the appropriate 
price may undermine Redrow’s 
ability to fulfil its business 
objectives.

IT Director

Cyber security
Failure of the Group’s IT 
systems and the security 
of our internal systems,  
data and our websites.

No change

Increase

Decrease

40

41

Strategic ReportGovernance ReportFinancial StatementsRedrow plc Annual Report 2015Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Shareholder InformationR I S K   M A N AG E M E N T   A N D   R I S K S   C O N T I N U E D

Category

Risk 

Risk Owner

Key Controls and Mitigating Strategies

Risk Movement

High 
Standards 
in Health 
& Safety

Improve 
Returns

Training 
for the 
Future

Improve 
Returns

Group Health and 
Safety Director

Health and safety/
environment
A significant Health and  
Safety or environmental 
incident may put people,  
the environment and  
Redrow’s reputation at risk.

Dedicated Health and Safety team operating 
across the Group to ensure appropriate 
standards are applied.

Regular site visits and audits are undertaken.

All staff receive appropriate training through 
in-house and external programmes.

Divisional CDM Client inspection process has 
been implemented during the year in response 
to increased Health and Safety requirements.

Health and Safety monitoring forms part of  
the monthly divisional Board reporting packs.

Group Commercial 
Director

Utilisation of suppliers, main contractors 
and subcontractors with a strong track  
record and reputation.

Key supplier, main contractor 
or subcontractor failure 
The failure or inability to 
expand capacity of a key 
supplier, main contractor or 
subcontractor may disrupt 
Redrow’s ability to manage  
its production process in  
an efficient and cost  
effective manner.

Close monitoring of supplier, main  
contractor and subcontractor quality 
through annual assessments.

Group Monthly Product Development  
meetings now being held as a consequence 
of the increased regulatory environment.

The shortage of skilled trades is mitigated by 
the monitoring of the subcontract supply  
chain to maintain the appropriate number  
of companies for each trade.

Subcontractor utilisation on sites is monitored 
to ensure workload and capacity are aligned.

National training centre.

Remuneration strategy reviewed regularly 
and benchmarked to retain quality staff.

Personal Development Programmes.

Graduate training and undergraduate 
placement programmes.

Apprentice training programme including 
office apprentices.

Communication enhanced through the Employee 
Survey and circulation of the InSight e-magazine.

Group Human 
Resources Director

Attracting and retaining staff
The loss of key staff and  
our failure to attract high 
quality employees may inhibit 
Redrow’s ability to achieve its 
business objectives.

Fraud/uninsured losses
A significant fraud or uninsured 
loss could damage the financial 
performance of Redrow.

Finance Director 
Operations

Systems, policies and procedures have  
been designed to segregate duties and 
minimise the opportunity for fraud.

Regular Business Process Reviews undertaken to 
ensure compliance with policies and procedures.

Divisional Action Plans have been 
implemented during the year as part of 
the Business Process Review.

Timely management reporting and challenge.

Business driven insurance strategy.

No change

Increase

Decrease

42

The Letchworth house type at Aston Fields, Shifnal, Shropshire

43

Strategic ReportGovernance ReportFinancial StatementsRedrow plc Annual Report 2015Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Shareholder InformationSUSTAINABILITY

OUR KEY ACHIEVEMENTS IN 2015

DESIGN

CUSTOMERS

COMMUNITY

PEOPLE

ENVIRONMENT

We are proud to build 
beautiful homes that are 
warm and efficient to run,  
on attractive developments 
that are healthy, vibrant 
communities in 
which to live. 

As well as ensuring we provide 
our customers with the best 
experience possible when 
buying their new home, we 
are also engaging with them 
on our sustainability strategy 
and the sustainability features 
of our homes. 

Provision of local economic 
development opportunities 
plays a crucial part in 
encouraging the 
establishment of sustainable 
communities. We are proud of 
the positive contribution that 
we make wherever we work. 

Our reputation as a good 
employer with excellent staff 
development is confirmed by 
our employees, over 90% of 
whom said Redrow is an 
employer they are proud to 
work for in a recent survey. 

We aim to provide a sustainable 
environment for our customers 
and local communities. As part 
of this we have established 
exciting new partnerships  
with conservation Non-
Governmental Organisations 
(NGOs) who are helping us 
improve ecology.

See pages 46 to 47

See pages 48 to 49

See pages 50 to 51

See pages 52 to 53

See pages 54 to 55

209

5

5

5

5

5

£128m

3,859

2.64

2.57

£113m

2,952

110

14

15

Hectares

11

12

13

14

15

14

15

5* Satisfaction Rating Since 2011

Funds Committed

PUBLIC OPEN 
SPACE CREATED

INDEPENDENT CUSTOMER 
SATISFACTION HBF RATING

We have almost doubled  
the total amount of public 
open space we have created

Maintaining our excellent HBF 
5 star customer service rating 
for a fifth successive year

More than half of our  
homes have integrated 
domestic recycling facilities

Continued success  
of My Redrow

79% of our homes are  
fitted with smart meters  
to monitor energy usage

Engaging with our customers 
on sustainable homes

MONIES COMMITTED TO 
FUND IMPROVEMENT OF 
LOCAL COMMUNITIES

13% increase in monies 
committed to fund 
improvement of  
local communities

We have improved our 
considerate constructor score 
whilst at the same time 
substantially increasing  
build activity

14

15

Days Delivered

TRAINING DAYS 
DELIVERED

14

15

Tonnes CO2e/100m2 of Build

CARBON 
EMISSIONS

3,859 training days delivered, 
up 30%

Carbon emissions reduced, 
relative to increased build

305 direct employment  
new jobs created

Partnership projects underway 
with RSPB and Bumblebee 
Conservation Trust

Offices and sites equipped 
with defibrillators

Reduced RIDDOR injuries  
by over 35%

Percentage of responsibly 
sourced timber continues  
to increase

Indicates that a video is available at redrow.co.uk/tv

V I S I T   O U R   N E W   S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y   P A G E S   A T
www.redrowplc .co.uk/sustainability 

44

45

Redrow plc Annual Report 2015 Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Strategic ReportGovernance ReportFinancial StatementsShareholder InformationDESIGN

THE EFFICIENT DESIGN OF OUR HOMES MEANS AS WELL  
AS ENJOYING COSY LIVING SPACES, OUR CUSTOMERS ALSO  
BENEFIT FROM LOWER RUNNING COSTS

PL A NS   FO R   2016

•  Continue to collate data on our design, 
construction and verification processes 
to inform improvements and refine the 
quality of design and construction of 
our new homes in response to the Zero 
Carbon Hub led project – “Designed 
versus As-Built Performance”

•  Develop Building Information 

Modelling (BIM) with the emphasis 
on integration with existing 
information structures alongside 
BIM-ready tools such as Autodesk 
Revit and Navisworks; and work 
closely with all our supply chain 
partners to develop information 
flow and improve the format in 
which we receive our data

Objective

2014

2015

2018 target

Progress

Public open space

Heat loss from home

% of homes incorporating  
renewable technologies

Reduce water usage  
(litres/head/day)

Homes including domestic 
recycling facilities

Homes fitted with  
smart meters

Building information  
modelling (BIM) development

110  
hectares

209  
hectares

Continual 
investment

54% better 
than 1970s

54% better 
than 1970s

66% better 
than 1970s

23%

19%

75%

105

105

80

47%

56%

75%

67%

79%

100%

Level 2

Level 2

Level 3

“The consistent quality  
of our design sets  
our product apart  
from the rest”

Improvement / level maintained

Decline

Summary of Progress 
The controlled growth of the business and the 
rise in completions has been mirrored by an 
increase in the public open space delivered to 
communities in association with our 
developments. We pride ourselves on the 
quality of our landscaping designs, which make 
an intrinsic contribution to the overall 
character of a development and the amenity 
for our customers. We have sought to improve 
the value of our open space contribution 
through our partnerships with the Bumblebee 
Conservation Trust and birds and wildlife 

charity RSPB; and it is pleasing to see the  
total space we provided rise to 209 hectares 
(2014: 110 hectares).

Encouraging sustainable living within the home 
is just as important as providing the right 
external environment and we’re pleased to 
report a 9% increase in the number of homes 
we constructed which included domestic 
recycling facilities to 56% (2014: 47%); and, 
with the assistance of our partners E.ON, a 
12% rise in the number of smart meters fitted 
to 79% (2014: 67%).

209

110

14

15

Hectares

PUBLIC OPEN  
SPACE CREATED

56%

47%

79%

67%

14

15

Percentage of Homes

HOMES WITH INTEGRATED  
RECYCLING FACILITIES

14

15

Percentage of Homes

HOMES FITTED  
WITH SMART METERS

GOOD DESIGN CAN HELP CREATE HEALTHY,  
SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES FOR ALL

In a statement issued in July 2015, the 
Government announced further measures  
as part of its Productivity Plan to reduce net 
regulation on housebuilders. These included 
cancelling the introduction of the zero carbon 
Allowable Solutions offsetting scheme and the 
proposed 2016 increase in on-site energy 
efficiency standards. Nevertheless, we will 
continue to work to improve on the quality  
and performance of our build specifications.

BIM Update
Development work on BIM continues and  
98% of all our designs are now drawn through 
Autodesk Revit, enabling us to quantify all 
required elements from the house type  
models created.  

Smartroof 
We have trialled a number of modern 
construction methods this year including the 
innovative Smartroof system. This involves  
the off site manufacture of a patented 
pre-insulated panel system which simply slots 
together, spanning from gable to gable to 
provide a complete, structural ‘room in roof’ 
solution. This provides our customers with a 
highly insulated living space in what would 
have been their attic.

This method of construction brings a number 
of specific benefits to Redrow in terms of site 
safety, thermal performance, consistent 
quality, speed of construction and reduced 
waste. The design simplifies scaffolding, 
reduces the amount of time spent working at 
height and susceptibility to wind damage and 
inclement weather during construction. The 
system also encourages a tidier site, reducing 
the risk of slips and trips.

D E S I G N I N G   SUS TA I N A B L E   CO M M U N IT I E S

Castle Fields, Barton Seagrove, Northamptonshire

Our Castle Fields and River View developments at Barton Seagrave provide perfect 
examples of how we help our customers to be environmentally friendly, help them  
to save money and provide substantial benefits for the community. 

The 54 acre site will deliver up to 450 new homes meeting Code for Sustainable Homes 
level 4 compliance, achieving a minimum 25% reduction in carbon emissions over relevant 
building regulations, as well as meeting a site-wide 30% energy reduction target, assisted 
by high quality photovoltaic installations on all homes.

Residents are encouraged to use pedal power to get around, as individual homes include 
cycle storage facilities and the design of the development includes a comprehensive cycle 
path network. The latter takes in a series of landscaped public open spaces with individual 
character, together with play areas and a large attenuation pond that forms part of the 
sustainable urban drainage system (SuDs).  In addition Redrow has protected and enhanced 
the nearby Southfield Farm Marsh, which is a ‘Site of Special Scientific Interest’ due to its 
rich and diverse rare vegetation and important wildlife habitat.

Customers can also take comfort in the fact that their new homes are helping to  
provide a package of community benefits worth £6m. As part of this commitment we  
are building a new community centre and extending an existing allotment site to the 
north of the development with the gift of a 7,592 square metres parcel of land, which  
will provide an additional 27 allotments and will be managed by the local council.

46

47

Fitting Smartroof panels at Goetre Uchaf, Bangor

Redrow plc Annual Report 2015 Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Strategic ReportGovernance ReportFinancial StatementsShareholder InformationCUSTOMERS

WE WANT TO PROVIDE OUR CUSTOMERS WITH THE  
BEST POSSIBLE HOME-BUYING EXPERIENCE

WE ARE BROADENING ENGAGEMENT WITH OUR  
CUSTOMERS ON SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES

PL A NS   FO R   2016

•  Embed and refine our  
Customer First brand 

•  Continue to update and  

roll-out sustainability training  
for sales teams

•  Review strategies with our  

Sales and Marketing team based 
on the results of our customer 
attitudes research

“Customers are  
our first priority at  
Redrow and we strive  
to deliver an exemplary  
customer service”

£10m

£6m

14

15

Customer Extras

CUSTOMER EXTRAS 
ON MY REDROW

Objective

2014

2015

2018 target

Progress

Independent customer  
satisfaction HBF rating

5 stars

5 stars

No.1 in 
customer 
service  
for home 
building in 
the UK

% of our customers recommending 
us to a friend per NHBC research

93%

90.2%

>95%

My Redrow Registrations

11,149

13,774

15,000

Customer extras

£6m

£10m

£15m

NHBC Pride in the Job Awards

14% of sites 15% of sites 20% of sites

Improvement / level maintained

Decline

Customer First
Customers are our first priority at Redrow,  
so we are delighted to report that for the fifth 
year running we received a 5 star independent 
HBF Customer Satisfaction rating. Not content 
with this we have progressively rolled out our 
“Customer First” strategy during the year with 
the aim of becoming Number 1 in customer 
service for home building in the UK. We believe 
that great customer service will sell homes and 
that customer service is our culture, not simply 
a department.

Our customers are fundamental to the 
business so we endeavour to listen and do 
everything we can to make sure that buying 
and owning their Redrow home is the best it 
can be. To deliver this commitment we have 

designed our new “Made for You” customer 
journey, which guides and supports our 
customers throughout the home buying 
process in five different steps from Exchange  
of Contracts to Move in Day. 

Registrations for My Redrow, our award winning 
direct internet channel to our customers, have 
increased 24% to 13,774 in the year. This has led 
to a strong increase in sales of customer extras, 
which have already exceeded our 2018 target of 
£10m. We have therefore increased our 2018 
target to £15m.

Sustainability Training Modules 
Our sales teams are often the first point of 
contact with our customers, who may use the 
opportunity to ask detailed questions about  
the sustainable features of their potential new 
home. We have previously highlighted that 

5

5

5

5

5

13,774

11,149

11

12

13

14

15

14

15

5* Satisfaction Rating Since 2011

Number of My Redrow Registrations

INDEPENDENT CUSTOMER  
SATISFACTION HBF RATING

MY REDROW  
REGISTRATIONS

our sales teams require a thorough 
understanding of the sustainable features of 
our new homes and associated communities  
to be able to effectively communicate the 
benefits to our customers. To support the 
training already rolled out this year in 
conjunction with our principal photovoltaic 
suppliers, JJM Building Supplies, sustainability 
training modules have been developed and 
added into the Sales, Construction and 
Technical development courses.

How to Videos
To complement our customer guidance we 
have created a series of short informative 
“How to” videos, available on Redrow TV, 
which provide easily understood information, 
advice and demonstrations for our customers 
on the operation and maintenance of internal 
and external home features. They also include 
sustainability features such as photovoltaics, 
composting and rain water harvesting.

Build Quality
Quality of build lies at the heart of customer 
satisfaction and at Redrow we pride ourselves 
on both the quality of design and construction  
of the homes and developments we build. 

The NHBC Pride in the Job Awards are the 
house building industry’s long standing and 
most prestigious recognition of site managers 
who achieve the highest standards and have 
been instrumental in driving up the quality of 
new homes over the last 35 years. Success is 
not only an accolade for the site manager, his 
team and the associated trades, but also 
provides our customers with a measure of  
the quality of our products. Our commitment 
to quality is underlined by the quality of our 
construction teams.

This year we congratulate 14 of our site 
managers who collected Pride in the Job 
Quality Awards in 2014 and in particular Paul 
Greenaway (South West), Rob Summers and 
Syd James (South Wales), Dave Williams (NW) 
and Stuart Bullough (Lancashire) who went on 
to collect Seal of Excellence Awards. 

Special mention goes to Rob Summers who once 
again collected a Supreme Award, the ultimate 
accolade, for his site at Cwm Calon, Ystrad 
Mynach. The first round of 2015 Pride in the Job 
has just been announced, with Redrow site 
managers securing a record 18 Quality Awards.

I N V E S T I G AT I N G   CUS TO M ER   AT T IT U D E S   
TO   SUS TA I N A B L E   D E V ELO PM EN T

With an estimated 220,000 new homes required each year to meet household projections, 
sustainability should be a fundamental consideration in the design and construction of all 
new homes and communities. Housing can have profound effects on how people live as a 
society, as well as having significant impacts on the environment. Despite this, there has 
been little research undertaken within the industry to examine the views of prospective 
customers on sustainable homes, their attitude to sustainable features and purchasing intent. 
Acknowledging this lack of data, Redrow has undertaken an in-depth research project led by 
its Sustainability Manager Nicola Owen, which has considered the purchase intentions of 
customers in respect of sustainable homes and the factors influencing their subsequent 
choices and decisions.

Contacting prospective customers on Redrow’s database elicited 1,730 responses and 
highlighted that customers are increasingly focusing on the value of sustainable development.

•  82% of respondents indicated a willingness to pay extra for a sustainable home  
•  60% agreed that they would be more likely to buy from a company building sustainable homes 
•   77.5% indicated they were confident about the positive environmental impact such a 

purchase was likely to have

Overall, the responses show that there is a growing customer preference towards sustainable 
homes and communities, but they also indicate that some uncertainty exists surrounding the 
choice of sustainable features. The data from this comprehensive study will be fed into our 
product design and sales and marketing strategies and will also inform further research to 
help us to deliver the homes our customers want and to encourage them to lead more 
sustainable lives.

Customers’ views drive our specification

48

49

Redrow plc Annual Report 2015 Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Strategic ReportGovernance ReportFinancial StatementsShareholder InformationCOMMUNITY

CREATING SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES IS  
THE HEART OF OUR BUSINESS

WE ARE PROUD OF THE POSITIVE CONTRIBUTION  
WE MAKE TO LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

PL A NS   FO R   2016

•  Develop alternative means of 
evaluating and promoting the 
sustainable value of our new  
homes to local communities

•  Carrying out comprehensive 

engagement with our stakeholders 
to further inform and develop  
our sustainability strategy

“Our continuing  
progress marks Redrow’s 
appreciation of the 
importance of social and 
economic investment at a 
local level for thriving 
sustainable communities”

Objective

2014

2015

2018 target

Progress

Monies committed to fund the 
improvement of local communities

£113m

£128m

Community consultations as  
% of planning submissions* 

New Metric

47%

Continued 
investment 
in local 
communities

Increased 
engagement

Considerate Constructors  
average score

Homes within 500m of  
a public transport node

34.54

34.82

>35

95%

95%

90%

* Minor planning submissions are excluded

Improvement / level maintained

Decline

Summary of Progress
We have again made substantial direct 
contributions to our local communities 
committing £128m, an increase of 13% over last 
year. Alongside the 12% increase in production 
achieved this year, we have also seen an 
improvement in our average Considerate 
Constructors’ score. 40 of our developments 
scored 30 or more, rating them as “Good”  
(2014: 10) and 23 of those scored 35+ rating 
them “Very Good”, more than tripling last year’s 
performance. Three sites, St Andrews Park in 
Halling, Kent, Howton Rise, in Newton Abbot, 
Devon, and Lymington Shores, in Lymington, 
Hampshire scored 40 or more, rating “Excellent”.

We’ve also maintained the number of homes we 
build within 500 metres of a public transport 
node at 95%, well above our Aspirations 2018 
target of 90%, and 99.6% of our homes are 
within 1,000m of a public transport node.

Community Consultations
Two years into our Redrow Aspirations 2018 Action 
Plan it is a suitable juncture to review some of the 
metrics we set with the benefit of experience. One 
metric which does not meaningfully measure 
progress is that relating to the number of 
community consultation events held, since they are 
clearly limited by the number of planning 
submissions made in any year. This year we have 
changed the metric to measure community 
consultations as a proportion of planning 
submissions made. This year this stands at 47% 
which we will target to improve year on year.

Our Contribution to Social, Economic  
and Environmental Sustainability
We continue to invest directly in our local 
communities in the form of social housing, S106 
contributions and Community Infrastructure 
Levy (CIL). The importance of the UK 
housebuilding industry to the UK economy and 

34.82

34.54

14

15

Average Score

99.6%

95%

Within 
500m

Within 
1000m

Percentage

£128m

£113m

14

15

Money Committed

CONSIDERATE CONSTRUCTORS  
AVERAGE SCORE

DISTANCE OF HOMES TO A  
PUBLIC TRANSPORT NODE IN 2015

MONIES COMMITTED TO FUND  
IMPROVEMENT OF LOCAL COMMUNITIES

its major contribution to social, economic and 
environmental sustainability was firmly 
underscored by a report published in March 2015, 
prepared by an independent planning, design and 
economics consultancy, Nathaniel Lichfield and 
Partners. The report was commissioned by the 
Home Builders Federation (HBF).

The scale of benefits the industry contributed 
in the past year is amply illustrated by the 
impressive headline figures:

•  £12.5bn invested in land and buildings  

for homes

•  £5.5bn spent on suppliers, 90% of  

which stayed in the UK

•  600,000 jobs generated

•  £5bn contributed to public services through 
tax paid, the construction of affordable 
housing and infrastructure improvements

•  £3.8bn spent in local shops and services  

by residents of new homes

•  £131m invested in open space, community, 

sport and leisure facilities

•  6.5m trees and shrubs were planted  

or retained

Ahead of this report, Redrow commissioned 
consultants Mott MacDonald (MM) to 
undertake various pieces of work to better 
understand the long term sustainability 
impacts of our own business, including a 
detailed analysis of the economic impact  
of our Barrow’s Green development at  
Widnes, Cheshire. 

Assessment was undertaken using MM’s 
Transparent Economic Assessment Model 
(TEAM), designed to calculate the economic 
impact of proposed infrastructure 
intervention and policy measures. TEAM 
has been developed in line with HM  
Treasury Green Book principles and  
Homes and Community Agency (HCA) 
additionality guidelines. The tool measures 
the potential stimulus to economic activity  
by estimating consequential employment, 
salary, Gross Value Added (GVA*) and 
investment benefits. 

ENGAGING PUPIL S IN ENERGY EFFICIENC Y

It is vitally important for the future that children understand about the impacts of climate 
change and how sustainable living can mitigate those effects. Redrow undertook a project 
with UTV Media involving engagement of schools from Kent and neighbouring Essex, who 
were invited to create a 60 second radio commercial promoting the benefits of new homes 
built with the environment in mind and explaining to other young people how important 
energy saving measures are in the home.

The winners of the competition, Bobbing Village School, in Sittingbourne, visited the studios 
of KMFM to have their advert professionally recorded and broadcast. The successful team 
were presented with a commemorative gold CD of their recording and a £500 cheque from 
Redrow for their Sustainability Projects Fund.

Teacher Lisa Bunning said: “We entered the competition as I thought it would be a useful and 
enjoyable way for my class to learn about an important global issue. The children benefitted 
from having a real purpose to their learning and were able to improve their understanding 
about energy efficiency, their speaking and listening skills, as well as using modern 
technology to produce their adverts.”

Photographs: A caption to go here to describe the images shown above

Bobbing Village School receiving their cheque for sustainability projects

The study concluded that in total the scheme, 
which will deliver 148 high quality 2, 3 and 4 
bedroom homes, will help to deliver 30 net 
additional full time employment jobs and 
£1.15m GVA/annum for the North West region.

Based on these findings we estimate that 1,080 
jobs have been created and £41.4m GVA/annum 
has been generated in those communities within 
which we work during the year as a result of our 

UK-wide construction activity. This excludes the 
additional benefits brought to these communities 
from the £128m invested via S106 contributions 
and Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) 
together with other measures to enhance local 
amenities and Green Infrastructure. The figures 
emphasise the significant and often unseen and 
valuable commitment which Redrow makes 
whenever we create a development.

50

51

* a measure in economics of the value of goods and services produced in an area, industry or sector of an economy.

Redrow plc Annual Report 2015 Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Strategic ReportGovernance ReportFinancial StatementsShareholder InformationPEOPLE

REDROW IS ALL ABOUT QUALITY AND THIS GIVES PEOPLE  
A REAL SENSE OF PRIDE AND ACHIEVEMENT

QUALITY AND SAFETY WORK HAND-IN-HAND

PL A NS   FO R   2016

Objective

•  Focus on improving inter-

departmental communications

•  Introduce enhanced  
e-learning platform

•  Extend succession planning  
to include junior positions 

•  Increase number of entries into 
NHBC Health and Safety Awards

•  Commitment to contractor 

engagement events

•  Independent health and safety 
assurance programme across  
the group

“ ‘The making of you’  
brand now underpins 
everything Redrow does 
from an employee 
perspective”

Trainees as percentage  
of workforce

2014

15%

2015

2018 target

Progress

15%

15%

Training days delivered

2,952

3,859

Graduate programme intake

22

28

Workforce under 25

15%

16.5%

Total workforce

1,346

1,651

Increasing 
training  
per head

Increase in 
line with 
growth

Maintain/
Increase

Maintain 
headcount 
growth

Health and Safety Awards

1 Highly 
commended

1 commended

3 Highly 
commended

Progressive 
improvement

Reportable accidents per site

0.37

0.23

0.3

Improvement / level maintained

Decline

Trainees
In 2013 we had 1,115 employees of whom 
14% were trainees. At that time we were 
aiming to employ 200 trainees at June 2015 
– in fact we have far exceeded that target and 
now have over 240 trainees in the business. 
Growth in direct employees has also been 
accelerated – over the last two years we  
have increased numbers by 25% and 23% 
respectively, creating around 540 new jobs  
in the process. We have therefore decided 
that our target for the percentage of trainees 
employed across Redrow will remain at  
15% for the next three years.

Training
Our focus on training continues to increase. 
With a 23% rise in headcount we actually  
saw a 30% rise in training days delivered.  
It is particularly pleasing to note that in only 
our second year of offering e-learning, our 
employees completed over 3,000 modules.  
This year we are extending our Graduate 
programme to offer a specific two year 
Construction programme which will  
introduce Graduates to all aspects of  
running a modern construction site and  
will lead to CIOB membership.

3,859

2,952

1,651

1,346

0.37

0.23

14

15

Training Days Provided

14

15

Number of Employees

14

15

Reportable Accidents per Site

NUMBER OF TRAINING DAYS

TOTAL WORKFORCE

REPORTABLE ACCIDENTS

52

Health and Safety
Accidents
Although the Group encountered a rise in 
overall accidents of 13% to 286 (2014: 253), 
stringent health and safety measures have 
resulted in the business reducing reportable 
injuries – as defined under the Reporting of 
Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences 
Regulations (RIDDOR) – by just over 35%.  
This is an excellent accomplishment 
considering a 14% increase in outlets open  
and 12% more plots completed in comparison 
to the previous year.

Redrow received 11 visits from the Health  
and Safety Executive (HSE), during 2014/15.  
No enforcement actions in the form of 
improvement or prohibition notices were 
issued following these visits.

Continual review of accident report 
information has allowed us to identify manual 
handling and slips, trips and falls as the primary 
cause of both first aid and reportable accidents 
within the business, mirroring those reported 
by other members of the Home Builders 
Federation (HBF).

The Health and Safety Team intends to 
re-categorise manual handling accidents  
on the Group’s accident reporting system to 
improve the data available for this accident 
causation category and we will be 
participating in a ‘slips and trips’ initiative 
during 2015/16, which will be co-ordinated  
by the HBF to raise awareness and reduce  
the number of incidents reported.

Awards
Three Redrow Site Managers secured Highly 
Commended Awards in this year’s National 
House-Building Council (NHBC) Health and 
Safety Awards designed to recognise and 
reward the very best in health and safety and 
to drive up safety standards in the industry by 
showcasing and sharing best practice.

These were outstanding results for our winning 
developments as only 29 awards were issued 
across the whole of the country in this category.

The award winning site managers are:

Redrow Midlands
Compton Park, Wolverhampton
Dave Dodd

Redrow Lancashire
Harbour Village, Fleetwood
Stuart Bullough

Redrow Lancashire
The Coppice, Banks, near Southport
Shaun Phoenix

Redrow also received a Special Award from the 
external judging panel at the NHBC Awards by 
being commended for our Automated External 
Defibrillator (AED) initiative, something that no 
other homebuilder has undertaken on this scale. 

Redrow now has fully automated external 
defibrillators at our St David’s Park 
headquarters, each of our divisional offices and 
the vast majority of our 100+ live outlets. 
Redrow’s defibrillators are registered on a 
national database, which provides emergency 
services in the area with details of AEDs 
available locally, providing potential lifesaving 
equipment to the company’s employees and 
subcontractors, and to members of the public 
and surrounding businesses.

The AED initiative was also recognised by  
the 2015 St John Ambulance Everyday Hero 
Awards, with Redrow being a shortlisted finalist 
in the Organisation of the Year category.

L–R David Bunyard H&S Manager, David Dodd Redrow Midlands, Stuart Bullough Redrow Lancashire, Shaun Phoenix 
Redrow Lancashire and Charlotte Weston H&S Manager, at the NHBC Health and Safety Awards 2015.

Dave Ford Redrow Group Health and Safety Director receiving the NHBC Commended Award with NHBC Chief Executive 
Officer Mike Quinton.

53

Redrow plc Annual Report 2015 Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Strategic ReportGovernance ReportFinancial StatementsShareholder InformationENVIRONMENT

WE ARE FOCUSING ON IMPROVING THE EFFICIENT USE  
OF MATERIALS, WATER AND ENERGY IN OUR ACTIVITIES

BUILDING SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES WITH ENRICHED ECOLOGY 
IMPROVES BIODIVERSITY AND POSITIVELY IMPACTS ON WELLBEING

PL A NS   FO R   2016

•  Further develop our biodiversity 
partnerships to extend their  
impact and share best practice

•  Focus on reduction and  
elimination of site waste

•  Further reduce carbon emissions 

from our operations

•  Develop our environmental 

management systems

Objective

2014

2015

2018 target

Progress

Total waste produced 
per 100m2 of build

8.1 tonnes/ 
100m²

9.84 tonnes/ 
100m2

7.5 tonnes/ 
100m²

Waste diverted from landfill

93.6%

92.6%

>95%

Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions

Site water consumption

2.64 tonnes 
CO2e/100m²
16.89 
m³/100m²

2.57 tonnes 
CO2e/100m2
21.01 
m3/100m2

10% 
reduction
Reduce  
m³/ 100m²

Divisional office energy audits

80%

80%

100%

Responsibly sourced timber

99.55%

99.82%

100%

% of build materials locally sourced

96%

% of subcontract labour  
employed locally

89%

93%

89%

95%

95%

Improvement / level maintained

Decline

“We are excited to be 
working with Redrow to 
create beautiful and 
harmonious landscapes for 
bumblebees that are in tune 
with nature…, as a 
responsible developer, 
Redrow could set the industry 
standard for collaboration 
with a wildlife NGO” 

Lucy Rothstein, CEO, BBCT

Summary Highlights 
Our carbon emissions, relative to increased 
build, have continued to reduce slightly this 
year following a significant drop in 2013/14. 
We continue to focus our efforts in this 
important area to ensure this progress 
continues and we have further divisional office 
energy audits planned for later this year. 

We have improved our reporting of waste 
generation to differentiate between 
construction, excavation and demolition 
waste, assisting us to effectively target waste 
elimination and necessitating the re-base of 
our targets. Construction waste diverted from 
landfill fell marginally to 92.6% (2014: 93.6%) 
however, our demolition waste stands at 
100% diverted.

Water use has proved more challenging  
due to our increased focus on considerate 
construction and the desire to be a responsible 
neighbour. In a very dry year, particularly in the 
south, we have used more water in dust control 
but are working to reduce water use further 
next year. 

GHG Reporting – Assurance
We aim to improve the transparency in  
our sustainability reporting and we have 
completed the first step in this process,  
having secured third party verification from 
leading inspection, verification, testing and 
certification company SGS. We have achieved 
limited assurance for our greenhouse gas data 
for 2013/14 as submitted to this year’s Carbon 
Disclosure Project, as well as this year’s data. 

2.64

2.57

99.55%

99.82%

Verification confirms our compliance with ISO 
14064-3: 2006, provides us with confidence in 
our future carbon management strategies and 
assures our stakeholders of the accuracy of  
our monitoring. See page 85 for our 
greenhouse gas emissions.

Sustainably Sourced Timber
Redrow Homes has been a participant in 
WWF’s Global Forest and Trade Network 
(GFTN) in the UK since 2003. All GFTN 
participants commit to progressively sourcing 
forest products from well managed sources. 

Achieving 100% responsibly sourced timber  
is one of our Aspirations 2018 targets and in 

the 2014 calendar year we made further 
progress towards our target with 99.82% 
(2013: 99.55%) of the timber and board 
material we purchased being Source Assessed/
Verified/Credibly Certified. This constitutes 
40.24% Source Assessed/Verified (e.g. PEFC 
purchased with Chain of Custody) and 59.58% 
Credibly Certified from forest sources meeting 
highest social and environmental standards 
(e.g. FSC purchased with Chain of Custody). 
Our ambition is to source 65% FSC by 2020.

WWF-UK Timber Scorecard
In response to the 2013 European Timber 
Regulation (EUTR), in May 2015 WWF-UK 
introduced their Timber Scorecard, ranking UK 

retailers, manufacturers and traders buying 
timber and timber products to raise awareness 
of the importance of tackling negative impacts 
on the world’s forests and to encourage the 
securing of timber and timber products from 
responsible sources. Assessment is based on 
verified performance information only for 2013 
or later and is expressed on a scale of 0 to 3 
“trees” where 3 “trees” represents an exemplar 
performance compliant to EUTR. We are 
delighted to report that Redrow was awarded a 
score of 2 “trees” in the recent May assessment.

SU PP O RT I N G   O U R   FLO R A   A N D   FAU N A

We are all increasingly being made aware of 
the plight of our wildlife in the face of climate 
change and the impact of modern living 
through the valuable work being done by 
various conservation organisations. We have 
put together two complementary partnerships 
to help us protect, enhance and create new 
habitats to support our flora and fauna 
wherever we work, and also promote the 
campaign work of the two organisations 
concerned, The Bumblebee Conservation  
Trust (BBCT) and The Royal Society for the 
Protection of Birds (RSPB).

The BBCT is an award winning and growing 
charity, established in response to concerns  
over the observed crash in bumblebee 

populations. It seeks to reverse population 
declines by 2020 through raising awareness 
and increasing understanding about 
bumblebees and the social, economic, 
environmental and cultural benefits that 
they and other pollinators contribute.

Redrow is proud to be the first UK homebuilder 
to partner with BBCT to provide habitat for 
bumblebees and other important pollinators.

To raise awareness with our customers, we 
have developed a co-branded seed dispenser 
tray and free packets of pollinator friendly 
seeds for our sales offices, as well as 
co-branded PR material such as a “Gardening 
for Wildlife” leaflet, seed impregnated 
change of address cards and welcome cards. 
BBCT is also providing us with guidance for 
our landscaping design at Old Park Village,  
in Pinhoe, Devon and our partnership has 
inspired a bee and nature themed bedroom 
design at our show home at Windsor Park,  
in Wakefield, West Yorkshire. Meanwhile,  
we have worked with BBCT to create 
pollinator friendly landscape areas in  
the parkland around our head office at  
St. David’s Park, Flintshire.

The RSPB needs little introduction and we 
are delighted to be able to support them in 
their “Give Nature a Home” campaign. The 

Bird boxes and other wildlife habitats installed  
at St. David’s Park, Flintshire

partnership between us is designed to 
strengthen the ability of each organisation 
to achieve sustainable development through 
early engagement in the design of targeted 
initiatives which benefit birds, biodiversity 
and people. We are co-operating to develop 
training workshops for key operations staff, 
producing co-branded advice and 
information for our customers offering 
guidance on best practice wildlife 
sustainability in and around their home. 

RSPB have engaged at an early design stage 
with our divisional technical team to provide 
input into Sustainable Urban Drainage 
Schemes (SuDs) and general design at Chaul 
End, Luton, including the building-in of 
features such as special swift nesting bricks.

55

14

15

Tonnes CO2e/100m2 of Build

CARBON EMISSIONS

54

CARBON FOOTPRINT DATA VERIFICATION

RESPONSIBLY SOURCED TIMBER

14

15

Percentage of Sourced Timber

Redrow Staff enjoying a Bumblebee Safari with  
Sinead Lynch from the Bumblebee Conservation Trust

Redrow plc Annual Report 2015 Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Strategic ReportGovernance ReportFinancial StatementsShareholder InformationThe Balmoral show home at The Limes, Horsforth Vale, Yorkshire

56

57

Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Strategic ReportGovernance ReportFinancial StatementsShareholder InformationCORPORATE GOVERNANCE

THE BOARD IS COMMITTED TO COMPLYING WITH CORPORATE 
GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES AND TO MAINTAINING HIGH STANDARDS  
OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Graham Cope
Company Secretary

The Board continues to believe that the 
balance of Non-Executives and Executive 
Directors has worked well. A number of Board 
meetings have been held in a number of the 
Divisions during the year and have included 
open discussion with the Management Teams 
on land acquisition, sales outlets, sales and 
our product. 

There have been no changes in corporate 
governance best practice during the financial 
year ended 30 June 2015.

Our 2015 Annual General Meeting will be held 
on Tuesday, 10 November 2015 and you will 
find the Notice of Annual General Meeting and 
some Explanatory Notes at the end of this 
Annual Report. For those who wish to attend 
the Board looks forward to meeting with you.

Graham Cope
Company Secretary

Dear Shareholder
I am delighted to introduce the Corporate 
Governance report outlining the Company’s 
approach to corporate governance. As outlined 
elsewhere in the report, the Board remains 
committed to high standards of corporate 
governance. This report on corporate 
governance sets out and explains in clear terms 
the processes in place which are essential for 
delivery of long-term success, while ensuring 
that the Company complies with all applicable 
laws and regulations and, of course, meeting 
the requirements of our shareholders and their 
representative bodies. 

This report has been prepared and approved by 
the Board and, on behalf of the Board, I confirm 
that during financial year ended 30 June 2015, 
the Company was compliant with the 
provisions of the UK Corporate Governance 
Code (“the Code”) other than as set out 
elsewhere in the Annual Report. This report 
also explains what the Board of Directors 
actually does and describes how it is 
responsible for setting the codes and values of 
the Company, thereby ensuring that the 
Company is run in the best interests of our 
shareholders and other stakeholders and how it 
interacts with its shareholders and explains the 
Company’s strategic goals and performance 
against them. 

The Blenheim house type from the Premier Heritage Collection

Introduction 
This report sets out the Company’s compliance with the UK Corporate 
Governance Code (“the Code”) issued by the Financial Reporting 
Council (www.frc.org.uk) and describes how the governance framework 
is applied by the Company.

The Directors have considered the contents and requirements of the 
Code and believe that throughout the year ended 30 June 2015, the 
Company has been compliant with the provisions of the Code.

The Board
The Board comprises an Executive Chairman, two further Executive 
Directors and four Independent Non-Executive Directors. 

Steve Morgan, as Chairman, is responsible for leadership of the Board and 
ensuring its effectiveness on all aspects of its role. The role of John Tutte, 
as Group Chief Executive, ensures that there is a clear division of 
responsibilities at the head of the Company between the running of the 
Board and the operational responsibility for the running of the Company’s 
business as required by the Code. This balanced approach also ensures no 
one individual has unfettered powers of decision. 

The governance structure is set out below:

Main Board

Non-Executive Team

• Senior Independent Director 
• Independent Non-Executive Directors

Executive Management Team

• Chairman  
• Group Chief Executive 
• Group Finance Director 
• Company Secretary 
• Group Regional Chief Executives 
• Group Human Resources Director 
• Group Sales & Marketing Director 
• Group Development Director

58

59

Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Strategic ReportGovernance ReportFinancial StatementsShareholder Information5
STEVE MORGAN (62) 
CHAIRMAN

4
JOHN TUTTE (59) 
GROUP CHIEF EXECUTIVE

3
BARBARA RICHMOND (55) 
GROUP FINANCE DIRECTOR

1
GRAHAM COPE (51) 
COMPANY SECRETARY

ROLE: He is primarily responsible for 
the effective working of the Board, 
taking a leading role in determining 
the Board’s composition and  
structure and ensuring that effective  
communications are maintained  
with shareholders. 

STRENGTHS AND SKILLS: Steve 
Morgan founded Redrow in 1974 and 
led the business from a small civil 
engineering contractor to become 
one of the UK’s leading home 
builders. He floated the Company in 
1994 and eventually stepped down 
as Chairman in November 2000, 
returning to the helm in March 2009.

Steve is also Chairman of 
Wolverhampton Wanderers, Carden 
Leisure and Trinity Aviation. He set 
up The Morgan Foundation in 2000, 
which is one of the largest charitable 
trusts in the north of England.

Steve is a Fellow of the Chartered 
Institute of Building and holds four 
Honorary Degrees. He was awarded 
an OBE in 1992.

M

ROLE: He is responsible for the 
operational management of the 
Group, the implementing of strategic 
plans and reporting on these to the 
Board. 

STRENGTHS AND SKILLS: John Tutte 
joined the Board of Redrow in July 
2002. In September 2009 he was 
promoted to Group Managing 
Director and in July 2014 became 
Group Chief Executive.

John qualified in civil engineering 
and has amassed more than 35 
years’ experience within the 
industry, having previously held  
the position as Chief Executive of 
Wilson Connolly plc.

ROLE: She is responsible for the  
financial management of the Group 
in its broadest sense. 

STRENGTHS AND SKILLS: Barbara 
Richmond joined the Board of 
Redrow in January 2010, bringing 
with her a proven track record, with 
over 20 years’ experience as Group 
Finance Director at a number of UK 
listed companies including Inchcape 
plc, Croda International PLC and  
Whessoe plc.

She has a strong background in both 
manufacturing and retail as well as 
having completed a number of major 
acquisitions and disposals 
throughout her career.

John was appointed to the board  
of the Home Builders Federation  
in February 2015.

Barbara was appointed a Non-
Executive Director of Lonza Group 
Ltd with effect from 16 April 2014.

M

Barbara is a Fellow of the Institute  
of Chartered Accountants in England 
and Wales and a graduate of the 
University of Manchester.

M

ROLE: He is responsible for 
governance structures and 
mechanisms, corporate conduct 
within the Company’s regulatory 
environment and circulars to 
shareholders and is the primary 
source of advice on the conduct of 
the business.

Graham is Company Secretary to  
the Main Board and Secretary to  
all Committees.

STRENGTHS AND SKILLS: Graham 
Cope joined Redrow as Head of  
Legal in November 2002 and was 
appointed Company Secretary two 
months later. He has over 20 years’ 
experience in the housebuilding 
sector, either working in-house or  
for clients in private practice.

Graham qualified as a Solicitor in 1989 
and is a member of the Law Society.

7

6

8

2

SIR MICHAEL LYONS (65)
NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

LIZ PEACE (62) 
NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

DEBBIE HEWITT (52) 
SENIOR INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR

NICK HEWSON (57) 
NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

ROLE: The Non-Executive Directors are members of the Board but do not form part of the Executive Management team. They have responsibility to  
constructively challenge and contribute to the development of strategy, scrutinise the performance of management, satisfy themselves that financial 
information is accurate and that financial controls and systems of risk management are robust and are responsible for determining appropriate levels of 
remuneration of the Executive Management team.

STRENGTHS AND SKILLS: Sir Michael 
joined the Redrow Board in January 
2015. He recently chaired the Lyons 
Housing Commission to produce a 
road map for increasing house 
building in this country. 

STRENGTHS AND SKILLS: Liz joined 
the Redrow Board in September 2014. 
She spent 13 years as the CEO of the 
British Property Federation and also 
had a long and distinguished career in 
the Civil Service. 

He is also Chairman of the English 
Cities Fund, which undertakes large 
scale urban regeneration schemes in 
a number of places and is Chairman 
of SQW Group and a strategic 
adviser to CBRE. 

She is currently a Non-Executive 
Director of Morgan Sindall Group plc 
and The Howard de Walden Estate. 
She is also a member of the Peabody 
Trust and a trustee of the property 
charity Land Aid.

Liz was awarded the CBE in the 2008 
New Year’s Honours List.

M   A   N   R    S

Prior to this, following a long and 
distinguished career in local 
government, Sir Michael completed 
a four year term as Chairman of  
the BBC and has held a range of 
non-executive positions across  
the three sectors.

M   A   N   R

STRENGTHS AND SKILLS: Debbie 
joined the Redrow Board in August 
2009. She has a wealth of board 
experience in executive and 
non-executive roles. 

She is currently the Non-Executive 
Chairman of Moss Bros plc, Evander 
Group, White Stuff and Visa UK.

She is also Non-Executive Director 
of NCC plc, The Restaurant Group 
PLC, BGL and Domestic & General.

Debbie has an MBA from Bath 
University, is a fellow of the 
Chartered Institute of Personnel and 
Development and was awarded the 
MBE in 2011 for services to business 
and the public sector.

M   A   N   R

STRENGTHS AND SKILLS: Nick 
joined the Redrow Board in 
December 2012. His business career 
to date has been spent mainly in the 
property industry, from commercial 
to residential.

Nick is currently a Non-Executive 
Director of Croma Security Solutions 
Group Plc.

Nick is a Fellow of the Institute of 
Chartered Accountants in England 
and Wales and has a degree in Law 
from Cambridge University.

M   A   N   R

Board Experience: 

 Finance 

 Property 

 Operational 

 Sustainability

Committee membership:  

M  Main Board  A  Audit Committee  N  Nomination Committee  R  Remuneration Committee  S  Sustainability Committee

4

2

1

3

5

6

7

8

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

AN ACTIVE, COMMITTED BOARD OF DIRECTORS  
WITH DIVERSE AND COMPLEMENTARY SKILL SETS

COMPOSITION  
OF THE BOARD

LENGTH OF TENURE OF  
NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS

MAIN BOARD  
BY GENDER

Non-executive 4

Executive 3

One to three years 3

Three to six years 1

Female 3

Male 4

60

61

Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Strategic ReportGovernance ReportFinancial StatementsShareholder Information 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE CONTINUED

The Board continued
Debbie Hewitt has already served a term  
of 6 years as a Non-Executive Director but  
the Board considers that it is appropriate that 
she continues for a further term of three years 
bearing in mind the relatively new members 
who have recently joined the Board and to  
give some continuity.

The Company Secretary acts as secretary  
to the Board and its Committees and his 
appointment and removal is a matter for the 
Board as a whole. The Company Secretary is a 
Member of the Executive Management Team 
and all Directors have access to his advice and 
services. In certain circumstances, Board 
Committees and individual Directors may wish 
to take independent professional advice in 
connection with their responsibilities and 
duties, and, in this regard, the Company will 
meet the reasonable costs and expenses 
incurred. Where appropriate, the Board 
delegates decisions to the Executive 
Management Team and other relevant 
management bodies.

Board Meetings 
The Board meets regularly and frequently,  
not less than six times during the year and 
maintains a close dialogue, as appropriate, 
between meetings. Board meetings are held  
at Head Office or Divisional Offices when 
visits are frequently made to a selection  
of developments accompanied by the local 
Management Team. Board papers are 
distributed in advance of the meetings to allow 
adequate time for review and preparation and 
include key strategic, operational and financial 
information. Attendance by individual Directors 
at Board meetings are set out below:

Details of internal control and risk 
management processes are included in the 
Audit Committee report on pages 64 to 67.

Board Balance and Independence
The Board considers that it is of a size and has  
a balance of skills, knowledge and experience 
that is appropriate for its business. The 
Executive Team provides the Board with an 
appropriate view of the detail of the business 
and the benefit of their significant collective 
experience of the UK house building industry 
and that enables it to discharge their respective 
duties and responsibilities effectively. The 
Non-Executive Directors bring a wealth of 
experience and understanding from outside the 
Company which enables them to challenge and 
help develop proposals on the Company’s 
strategy. All Non-Executive Directors holding 
office during the year ended 30 June 2015 are 
considered to be independent.

Details of the Directors’ respective experience 
is set out in their biographical profiles on pages 
60 to 61.

Under the Code, at least half the Board, 
excluding a Non-Executive Chairman, should 
comprise Non-Executive Directors determined 
by the Board to be independent. The Board 
currently comprises three Executive and four 
Independent Non-Executive Directors in 
compliance with the Code.

The Board considers that each Director is able 
to allocate sufficient time to the Company to 
discharge their responsibilities effectively. 

Table of Attendance

Name

Steve Morgan 

John Tutte 

Role 

Chairman 

Group Chief Executive 

Barbara Richmond

Group Finance Director

Debbie Hewitt

Nick Hewson

Liz Peace

Senior Independent Director

Non-Executive Director

Non-Executive Director

Sir Michael Lyons

Non-Executive Director

All details for the Directors are provided on pages 60 to 61.

Attendance at Meetings 

6/6

6/6

6/6 

6/6

6/6

6/6

3/3

Board Performance Evaluation and 
Professional Development
The Board undertook an internal formal 
evaluation of its own performance during the 
year ended 30 June 2015. This started with a 
questionnaire designed to assess performance 
and ongoing effectiveness across key areas in 
the financial year ended 30 June 2015 and to 
maintain visibility and progress during the 
financial year. Following the completion of the 
questionnaire, a report was presented to  
the Board and discussed and, as a result, the 
Board considers that it continues to operate 
effectively with meetings to facilitate debate 
and decision making. 

The evaluation also considered succession 
planning for the Executive Team. 

The Board recognises that a structured 
appraisal process and good training are 
important requirements across the Group.  
The Board receives regular presentations and 
briefings from those responsible for key Group 
disciplines. In addition, the Board maintains 
close working relationships with Divisional 
Management Teams. 

All Directors undertake a comprehensive 
induction programme following their 
first appointment.

The programme for the Non-Executive 
Directors is specifically designed to encompass 
the full breadth of the business and includes 
visits to operating businesses. 

During the year the formal appraisals of the 
Group Chief Executive and the Group Finance 
Director were undertaken by the Chairman.

All Independent Non-Executive Directors had 
an annual appraisal conducted by the Senior 
Independent Director.

Committees 
The Board is supported by Audit, Nomination, 
Remuneration and Sustainability Committees 
and their memberships, roles and activities are 
set out in separate reports; the Audit 
Committee Report can be found on pages 64 to 
67; the Nomination Committee Report on page 
68; the Remuneration Committee Report on 
pages 70 to 83; and the Sustainability 
Committee Report can be found on page 69.

Each Committee reports to and has Terms  
of Reference approved by the Board and the 
Minutes of the Committee meetings are 
circulated and the Committee Chairmen 
provide reports to the Board. 

The Chief Executive is responsible for:

•  operational management of the Group;

•   implementing strategic plans; and 

•  reporting on these to the Board

The Audit Committee is chaired by 
Nick Hewson, the Remuneration and the 
Nomination Committees are chaired by 
Debbie Hewitt and the Sustainability 
Committee by Liz Peace. 

The Board completed a performance evaluation 
of its Committees during the financial year 
ended 30 June 2015 and it was concluded  
they were contributing and functioning 
effectively and were complying with their 
terms of reference. 

Governance at Work in the Business 
The Board aims to meet governance  
best practice where it fits with the  
Company’s business. 

The Board has a formal schedule of matters 
reserved specifically for its decisions. 
The matters reserved include:

•  approval of Redrow’s long term objectives 

and strategy;

•  approval of the Annual Report, preliminary 

and half-yearly financial statements, interim 
management statements, trading updates 
and the recommendation of dividends; 

•   approval of any significant changes in 

accounting policies or practices; any changes 
relating to capital structure; approval of 
treasury policies; 

•  ensuring the maintenance of a sound system 
of internal control and risk management; 

•  approval of corporate acquisitions or 
disposals, significant land purchases 
or contracts; 

•  changes to the size, structure and 

composition of the Board; 

•  approval of significant policies, including 
Redrow’s Health and Safety policy; and

•  review of overall corporate governance 

arrangements.

The Chairman is primarily responsible for:

•  effective working of the Board;

•  taking a leading role in determining the 
Board’s composition and structure; and 

•  ensuring that effective communications  

are maintained with shareholders.

The Senior Independent Director supports the 
Chairman in ensuring the Board is effective and 
that constructive relations are maintained.  
In addition to acting as a Senior Independent 
Director, in which capacity she leads the 
annual performance evaluation of the 
Chairman she also provides an additional 
point of contact for shareholders. 

The Company has Directors’ and Officers’ 
insurance in place which insures Directors 
against certain liabilities, including legal costs.

Appointments and Re-Elections to  
the Board
The Nomination Committee has recommended 
the re-appointment of the Executive and 
Non-Executive Directors. The Nomination 
Committee report can be found on page 68. 

Under the Company’s Articles of Association, 
all Directors are subject to re-election at their 
first General meeting after appointment. The 
Board having been informed of the conditions 
of the Code on election and re-election, 
including that there should be a formal, 
rigorous and transparent procedure for the 
appointment of new directors to the Board,  
and that re-election is subject to continued 
satisfactory performance, has decided that  
all Directors will be submitting themselves  
for re-election at the Annual General Meeting. 
The Board has satisfied itself all Directors who 
will be submitting themselves for re-election 
continue to perform satisfactorily. Details of 
appropriate Annual General Meeting 
Resolutions can be found on page 125.

Capital Structure
The information of the capital structure of the 
Company is included in the Directors’ Report 
on pages 84 to 85.

Diversity 
The principle of Boardroom diversity is strongly 
supported by the Board. It is the Board’s policy 
that appointments to the Board will always be 
based on merit, so that the Board has the right 
individuals in place, and recognises that 
diversity is seen as an important consideration 
as part of the selective criteria used to assess 
candidates to achieve a balanced Board.

The table below sets out the current position 
of the Company on a gender basis.

Executive 
management team 

Redrow employees  
at June 2015 

Female

Male

2 (20%)

8 (80%)

536 (32%) 1,115 (68%)

Shareholder Engagement
The Company announces its financial results 
half-yearly and, immediately following their 
publication, undertakes formal presentations 
to equity analysts. These presentations are 
available on the Company’s website. 

During the year ended 30 June 2015, the 
Chairman, the Group Chief Executive and the 
Group Finance Director, together with the 
Senior Independent Director, also held a 
number of meetings with significant 
shareholders and subsequently briefed the 
Board on issues discussed at these meetings. 

Following the full year and half-yearly results’ 
announcement in September 2014 and 
February 2015, the Chairman, Group Chief 
Executive and Group Finance Director met 
current and potential significant shareholders. 
This embraced visits to London and Edinburgh 
and feedback from these meetings is 
independently collated and disseminated  
to the Board.

The Annual General Meeting takes place at a 
venue close to the Company’s Head Office. All 
Directors attended the Annual General Meeting 
on 10 November 2014. Shareholders are 
encouraged to attend the Annual General 
Meeting, which represents an opportunity for 
all shareholders attending to table questions 
formally during the meeting and informally 
afterwards to the Company’s Directors. 

Formal notification of the Annual General 
Meeting, through the Annual Report, is sent  
to shareholders at least 21 working days in 
advance. It is the Company’s policy to propose 
a separate Resolution at the Annual General 
Meeting on each substantive issue.

Redrow’s website, www.redrowplc.co.uk,  
gives access to current financial and  
corporate information.

Graham Cope
Company Secretary 

7 September 2015

62

63

Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Strategic ReportGovernance ReportFinancial StatementsShareholder InformationAUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT 

THE COMMITTEE’S PRINCIPAL RESPONSIBILITIES LIE IN REVIEWING  
THE GROUP’S FINANCIAL REPORTING, OVERSEEING THE APPOINTMENT 
AND WORK OF THE EXTERNAL AUDITORS AND REVIEWING REDROW’S 
INTERNAL CONTROL PROCESSES

Nick Hewson 
Chairman of the Audit Committee

review of the year ended June 2015 financial 
statements. The Committee Chairman also 
met with the Engagement Partner of the 
external Auditors and the Finance Director 
(Operations) to discuss Internal Audit matters. 
The Group Company Secretary acts as 
Secretary to the Committee.

Responsibilities and Terms of Reference
The key responsibilities of the Committee are:

•  monitoring the integrity of the financial 

statements of the accompanying reports to 
the shareholders and Corporate Governance 
Statements including reviewing the findings 
of external Auditors;

•  reviewing and monitoring the effectiveness 
of systems for internal control, financial 
reporting and risk management;

•  reviewing and overseeing the effectiveness 

of Internal Audit;

•  making recommendations to the Board in 

relation to the appointment and removal of 
external Auditors and approving the 
remuneration and terms of engagement; and 

Attendance at Meetings 

3/3

3/3

3/3

2/2

Committee Membership and Meetings
The four Members of the Committee are 
Independent Non-Executive Directors and  
the Board believes the Committee has the 
appropriate level of experience to fulfil its 
Terms of Reference. 

The Group Finance Director and Finance 
Director – Group Services attend meetings by 
invitation and both were present at all the 
meetings in the year ended 30 June 2015. The 
external Auditors, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 
(“PwC”), and the Finance Director (Operations) 
who has responsibility for Internal Audit, were 
also in attendance at all meetings.

The Committee met three times in the year 
ended 30 June 2015 and a summary of the 
principal activities of the Committee are  
listed below.

Detailed papers and information were 
circulated sufficiently in advance of meetings 
to allow proper consideration of the matters 
for discussion. The Committee also met 
privately with the external Auditors and with 
Internal Audit following the final audit and the 

Table of Attendance

Name

Nick Hewson 

Debbie Hewitt

Liz Peace

Sir Michael Lyons

Role 

Chairman

Member

Member

Member

64

•  reviewing and monitoring the external Audit 
process and independent activity of the 
Auditors as well as the nature and scope of 
the external Audit and its effectiveness.

The Committee’s Terms of Reference  
are available on the Company’s website  
(www.redrowplc.co.uk).

Audit Committee Reporting on  
Significant Issues
The primary areas of judgement which were 
considered by the Committee and how these 
were addressed is set out below.

Net realisable value of inventories
The Committee receives a paper prepared by 
management at each reporting date outlining 
the approach taken by management to assess 
the net realisable value of inventories together 
with details of sites with significant areas of 
judgement. The Group Finance Director and 
Finance Director – Group Services attend 
meetings by invitation to answer any  
questions the Committee may have.

The Committee also annually reviews the 
internal controls that are in place and reviews 
the findings of PwC’s testing of controls and 
processes for estimating as well as the 
adequacy of disclosures that management 
propose to be made in financial statements.

Defined benefit pension scheme valuation
The Committee receives details of the IAS 19R 
– Employee Benefits valuations carried out at 
each reporting date for management by the 
actuary who advises the Company and the 
underlying assumptions. A sensitivity analysis 
is also provided for its consideration. The 
Committee also receives details of the 
triennial independent scheme valuation report 
prepared by the Scheme Actuary and reviews 
key judgement areas made including relevant 
actuarial advice that has been received. In 
addition the Committee also reviews the 
findings of PwC’s testing of pension scheme 
assets and liabilities.

Main Activities During the Year 
The Committee followed a programme which  
is structured around the annual reporting cycle 
and received reports from Internal Audit, the 
external Auditors and management. 

The principal activities undertaken are  
shown below:

Audit Independence
PwC were appointed Auditors in 2003 having 
succeeded PricewaterhouseCoopers who 
were appointed in 1987. The current Audit 
Partner from PwC commenced his tenure 
following the conclusion of the year ended 
30 June 2010 audit.

The Committee has a formal policy in respect of 
the work of the external Auditors. The purpose 
of this policy is to ensure that the Auditor’s 
objectivity and independence is maintained by 
ensuring both that the nature of any non-audit 
work undertaken and the level of fees paid does 
not compromise the Auditor’s position. 

At its meeting in February 2015 the Committee 
considered whether to retain PwC as auditor 
and concluded that, in view of the quality of 
service provided and the cost effectiveness of 
the work carried out, it would be appropriate  
to retain them.

The Committee does not currently have a 
formal policy on re-tendering of the external 
audit. However, following the Order of the 
Competition and Markets Authority in relation 
to FTSE 350 companies which will require the 
Company to change its statutory auditor by 
the date of the Annual General Meeting prior 
to June 2020, the Committee will be 
considering its policy over the next 12 months.

Appointments in respect of non-audit work 
require the prior approval of the Committee 
within an established budget. In addition, no 
work can be undertaken by the external 
Auditors in any area where there is any 
identifiable risk that the work of an individual 
within the external Audit firm or the external 
Audit firm generally could conflict or 
compromise the quality, objectivity or 
independence of any audit or compliance  
work undertaken for the Group.

The external Auditors are not indemnified  
by the Company nor has the Company 
purchased liability insurance for them.

Details of fees paid to PwC are disclosed  
on page 102.

September 2014 A review of the full year 2014 results including the Annual Report and Accounts and a report from the external Auditors; and 

consideration of the Group risk assessment process and a going concern review.

February 2015

A review of the 2015 half-yearly report and going concern including a report from the external Auditors;

A review of the Terms of Reference of the Committee;

A review of the proposed external Audit strategy for 2015 and associated fees;

A review of the effectiveness of the external Audit process;

A review of the independence and objectivity of the external Auditors; and 

A review of the Committee’s effectiveness.

June 2015

A review of the appropriateness of the Group’s accounting policies;

A review of the Risk Register;

A review of the Group’s Whistleblowing Policy;

A review of the Group’s Anti-Bribery Policy;

A review of internal controls across the whole business; and 

An update on Internal Audit, its strategy and a review of the Internal Audit timetable for 2016.

September 2015 A review of the full year 2015 results, including the Annual Report and a report from the external Auditors; and 

consideration of the Group risk assessment process and a going concern review.

65

Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Strategic ReportGovernance ReportFinancial StatementsShareholder InformationAUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT CONTINUED

Risk Register
The Group formally reviews its prioritised Risk 
Register every year. The updated and reviewed 
Risk Register is then discussed and approved by 
the Committee. In addition, the Executive Board, 
through its regular meetings, reviews key areas 
of risk on an ongoing basis and considers 
whether the internal controls identified in 
relation to those risks remain appropriate. 

Insurance
The Board has appointed an experienced broker 
to advise on and co-ordinate all insurance 
matters across the Group and they liaise 
closely with appropriate Redrow personnel  
at Head Office and within the Divisions and 
report directly to the Group Finance Director.

Risk Management and Internal Audit
The Group’s Risk Register defines controls  
as prevent or detect and identifies owners 
for each high level risk. Feedback on the risks 
and controls is actively encouraged and is 
facilitated by links on the Group’s intranet  
to ensure the risks listed remain relevant  
and accurate. The Register itself is regularly 
maintained and is reviewed by the  
Committee annually. 

The Internal Audit strategy is discussed with 
PwC and discussed and agreed with the 
Committee. Suggested control improvements 
and any control weaknesses identified are 
followed up as appropriate. The cornerstone 
of the Internal Audit work undertaken is the 
Business Process Reviews. A risk-based 
programme was designed based on the Risk 
Register. The Business Process Review 
programme looks to provide assurance to the 
Group, by testing internal controls and 
reviewing specific risks, as well as seeking  
out best practice and sharing it across the 
Group and identifying business process 
improvements. Committee Members  
receive an Executive Summary of each 
Business Process Review report.

Internal Controls
The Board of Directors recognises its overall 
responsibility for the Group’s system of 
internal control and for monitoring its 
effectiveness. There is an ongoing process  
for identifying, evaluating and managing 
significant risks. However, in reviewing the 
effectiveness of internal control, any internal 
control system can only provide reasonable  
but not absolute assurance against material 
misstatement or loss. 

Key business activities, including finance, land 
acquisition, product design and procurement 
and information technology are controlled  
by the Executive Directors. All activity is 
organised within a defined structure with 
formal lines of responsibility, designated 
authority levels and a structured reporting 
framework. A formalised reporting structure 
is established within Redrow. The Executive 
Directors, the Company Secretary, Regional 
Chief Executives, Group Human Resources 
Director, Group Sales and Marketing Director 
and Group Development Director (“the 
Executive Board”) meet monthly to discuss 
the Group’s key issues, risks and opportunities. 
The Divisions also hold monthly board 
meetings which are attended on a rotational 
basis by the Executive Directors.

The key features of the Group’s internal 
controls are as follows:

•  defined authorisation levels exist over key 
areas such as land purchase, the placing of 
orders and contracts and staff recruitment;

•  a comprehensive prioritised Risk Register 

which is regularly reviewed and presented  
to the Audit Committee;

•  the Group’s management information 

systems provide weekly updates on key 
statistics and information in respect of sales 
and production and the content of these 
weekly reports is regularly reviewed to 
ensure it remains appropriate;

•  Redrow has an in-house Health and Safety 
Department and places great emphasis on 
the importance of health and safety and 
environment management. The department 
works closely with the Divisions to ensure 
that training is provided to employees and 
subcontractors. Best practice is shared and 
appropriate actions are taken to comply with 
health and safety best practice and 
legislation throughout the organisation;

•  the Board requires each Director in its 

operating divisions to complete an annual 
statement on Corporate Governance and 
related party transactions. The statement  
is designed to provide assurance that  
Group policies and procedures are being 
implemented and complied with in all 
material respects; 

•  in addition, key functional Directors 
complete a Principal Controls Self-
Assessment Questionnaire which is reviewed 
by the Board to assist in improvements in 
the control framework;

•  a weekly business report (“WBR”) comprising 
sales funnel information, gross margins and 
order book is produced for the Group, each 
Division and each site and circulated across 
the Group;

•  a monthly reporting pack is circulated in 

advance and reviewed at each of the Main, 
Executive and Divisional Board meetings. 
Annual budgets are set, with actual 
performance compared against the 
annual budget;

•  preparation and regular updates of  

Strategic Plans; 

•  a policy and procedures manual which covers 

all the significant aspects of the Group’s 
operations and describes the systems and 
controls that are to be applied; and 

•  daily statements of a reconciled cash 

position identifying significant payments  
are prepared, rolling cash flow forecasts are 
prepared and forecast banking covenant 
compliance are tested.

Throughout the year, the Committee has 
carried out assessments of internal control by 
considering documentation from the Executive 
Directors and the internal audit function as 
well as taking into consideration events since 
the year end. The internal controls extended to 
the financial reporting process and the 
preparation of consolidated accounts. The basis 
for the preparation of consolidated accounts 
has been undertaken in accordance with the 
Company’s Accounting policies as set out on 
pages 98 to 101.

The Committee therefore confirms that it is 
satisfied that the system of controls has been 
in operation throughout the financial year and 
up to the date of this report.

Whistleblowing
The Group has a widely publicised 
Whistleblowing Policy which enables 
employees and other stakeholders to raise 
concerns in confidence. The Committee has 
arranged to receive reports on all occasions 
when such issues are raised under this policy. 
The Whistleblowing Policy is formally reviewed 
and approved each year by the Committee.

Bribery Act
Following the introduction of the Bribery Act 
2010 the Company put in place a policy on 
bribery and corruption for all employees to 
strictly adhere to. The Company Secretary 
ensures that the policy is complied with, 
updates the policy, procedures and company 
code of practice as and when required and 
provides regular reports to the Committee.  
The Bribery Act policy is formally reviewed  
and approved each year by the Committee.

Training is given to all staff to highlight the 
various forms of bribery and all new staff attend 
an induction course at the commencement of 
their employment which includes a section 
relating to bribery and the implication on 
individuals and the company of an act of 
bribery either given or received. Every year, 
through its new internal e-learning facility, 
each employee will be required to complete  
a mandatory compliance test which reminds 
each employee of their obligations.

Performance evaluation 
The Committee completed a performance 
evaluation during the Financial Year and a 
report was presented to the Committee  
and discussed. The Committee was found  
to be effective and it was concluded that  
the Committee had fulfilled its remit and  
had in place appropriate Terms of Reference. 

Nick Hewson 
Chairman of the Audit Committee

7 September 2015

66

67

Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Strategic ReportGovernance ReportFinancial StatementsShareholder InformationNOMINATION COMMITTEE REPORT

SUSTAINABILITY COMMITTEE REPORT

THE COMMITTEE REVIEWS THE SIZE, STRUCTURE, BALANCE AND 
COMPOSITION OF THE BOARD AND IDENTIFIES AND NOMINATES 
FOR APPROVAL CANDIDATES TO FILL BOARD VACANCIES 

THE COMMITTEE ASSESSES THE IMPACT OF COMPANY  
OPERATIONS ON THE ENVIRONMENT AND COMMUNITIES  
AFFECTED BY ITS ACTIVITIES

Committee Membership and Meetings
All Members of the Committee are 
Independent Non-Executive Directors with 
Debbie Hewitt, the Senior Independent 
Director, being Chair of the Committee. The 
other Members of the Committee during the 
period ending 30 June 2015 were Nick Hewson, 
Liz Peace and Sir Michael Lyons.

The Committee met twice during the year 
ended 30 June 2015. For all meetings, papers 
were circulated sufficiently in advance to allow 
proper consideration of all matters for 
discussion. The Group Company Secretary acts 
as Secretary to the Committee.

Responsibilities and Terms of Reference
The key responsibilities of the Committee are:

•  reviewing the structure, size and 

composition of the Board (including skills, 
knowledge and experience) and making 
recommendations for further recruitment to 
the Board or proposing changes to the 
existing Board.

Debbie Hewitt
Chairman of the Nomination Committee

•  reviewing the leadership needs of the 

•  a review of the structure, size and 

Company, both executive and non-executive, 
ensuring appropriate succession planning for 
directors and other senior executives within 
the business.

•  leading the process for Board appointments 
ensuring they are conducted on merit and 
against objective criteria. 

•  making recommendations to the Board, 
including on the re-appointment of 
Non-Executive Directors, the re-election  
of Directors at the Annual General Meeting 
and the membership of the Audit, 
Nomination, Remuneration and 
Sustainability Committees. 

•  ensure that a formal structured and tailored 
induction programme is undertaken by any 
newly appointed member of the Board.

•  reviewing annually the time required from 

the non-executive directors.

The Committee’s Terms of Reference  
are published on the Group’s website 
(www.redrowplc.co.uk).

Main Activities During the Year 
During the year to 30 June 2015 the 
Committee undertook the following activities:

composition of the Board. The Committee 
recommended to the Board the 
appointment of an additional Non-
Executive Director to ensure appropriate 
succession planning of the Non-Executive 
Directors. The Committee subsequently 
concluded that the present Board balance 
and composition remains appropriate but 
that it will be kept under review.

•  undertook the recruitment process for the 

appointment of a new Non-Executive Director.

•  recommended that the Directors stand for 
re-election at the 2015 Annual General 
Meeting in accordance with UK Corporate 
Governance Code.

•  reviewed the Committee’s Terms of Reference.

The Directors were not present and did not vote 
when their individual proposals were discussed.

Performance Evaluation 
The Committee completed a performance 
evaluation during the Financial Year and a 
report was presented to the Committee and 
discussed. The Committee was found to be 
effective and it was concluded that the 
Committee had fulfilled its remit and had  
in place appropriate Terms of Reference.

Debbie Hewitt
Chairman of the Nomination Committee 

7 September 2015

Table of Attendance

Name

Debbie Hewitt

Nick Hewson

Liz Peace

Sir Michael Lyons

68

Role 

Chairman 

Member

Member

Member

Attendance at Meetings 

2/2

2/2

2/2

1/1

Liz Peace
Chairman of the Sustainability Committee

including environmental management 
systems, waste management systems, 
recycling and energy management.

•  to review the Company’s policies and 
reporting with regard to personnel 
recruitment, development and succession 
planning to ensure a sustainable and 
engaged workforce. 

•  reviewing the Housing Standards and their 

impact on the Company’s own design standards.

•  monitoring the Company’s response to 

environmental legislation and regulation, 
including the continuing impact of the Flood 
and Water Management Act 2010 and the 
changes to Part G, Part H and Part M 2013  
of the Building Regulations.

•  to have regard to the Company’s 

•  reviewing the new Sustainability website.

Committee Membership and Meetings
The Members of the Committee comprise Liz 
Peace, who is Chair of the Committee and an 
Independent Non-Executive Director, Nigel 
Smith, Group Research and Sustainability 
Director, and Karen Jones, Group Human 
Resources Director. 

The Committee met three times during the 
year ended 30 June 2015. For all meetings, 
papers were circulated sufficiently in advance 
to allow proper consideration of all matters 
for discussion. The Group Company Secretary 
acts as Secretary to the Committee.

Responsibilities and Terms of Reference
The key responsibilities of the Committee are:

•  to develop and monitor the Board’s  

approach to sustainability and to review  
and approve the sustainability targets 
proposed by management.

•  to assess the impact of the Company 
operations on the environment and 
communities affected by its activities, 
including the consideration of policies to 
enhance the benefits of those activities  
and mitigate any negative impact of  
those activities.

developments in customer engagement and 
service to ensure its values are upheld.

The Committee regularly reviews its Terms of 
Reference; these were last reviewed in March 
2015 and are published on the Group’s website 
(www.redrowplc.co.uk).

Main Activities During the Year 
During the year ended 30 June 2015 the principal 
activities of the Committee were as follows:

•  overseeing and receiving regular updates on 

the Company’s Aspirations 2018 sustainability 
action plan, following publication of the 
Sustainability Report in October 2013. This 
action plan included the delivery of focused 
training on environmental and sustainability 
matters to employees. 

•  monitoring the introduction of e- learning 

•  to have regard to environmental corporate 
social responsibility and community issues, 

and the introduction of Green Teams 
throughout the Divisions. 

Table of Attendance

Name

Liz Peace 

Nigel Smith 

Karen Jones 

Role 

Chairman 

Member

Member

Attendance at Meetings 

3/3

3/3

2/3

•  reviewing the Company’s environmental 

management standards. 

•  supporting the forging of new relationships 
between the Company and the RSPB and 
Bumblebee Conservation Trust.

•  monitoring the Company’s responses to 

numerous consultation papers and 
environmental surveys from the 
Government and its agencies and other 
stakeholders in the sustainability arena. 

•  initiating an internal review of how 

sustainability is managed and embedded 
within Company policies and how objectives 
should be set and measured within the context 
of the Company’s wider business targets.

Performance Evaluation 
The Committee completed a performance 
evaluation during the Financial Year and a 
report was presented to the Committee and 
discussed. The Committee was found to be 
effective and it was concluded that the 
Committee had fulfilled its remit and had in 
place appropriate Terms of Reference.

Liz Peace
Chairman of the Sustainability Committee 

7 September 2015

69

Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Strategic ReportGovernance ReportFinancial StatementsShareholder InformationDIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION REPORT

I am pleased to present the Directors’ 
Remuneration Report for the year ended 
30 June 2015. 

At the Annual General Meeting on 
10 November 2014, our Directors’ 
Remuneration Policy was put to a binding 
shareholder vote, which was approved by  
over 95% of the votes cast. The Remuneration 
Committee believes that this approved Policy 
continues to reflect our overall remuneration 
philosophy set out below, and we are 
therefore not proposing any changes to our 
Remuneration Policy this year. The full Policy 
is not included in this year’s report but an 
extract of the policy table (which explains 
how our framework operates) is set out on 
pages 72 to 73.

Debbie Hewitt
Chairman of the Remuneration Committee

The Annual Remuneration Report (pages 75 to 
83) provides details on the remuneration we 
paid in respect of 2015 and how we intend  
to operate our policies in 2016. It will be 
submitted to an advisory shareholder vote  
at the 2015 Annual General Meeting.

Our Philosophy – Aligning  
Reward with Performance
Our Remuneration strategy has been designed 
to reflect the needs of a UK based, capital 
intensive, house builder, with ambitious 
growth plans. We make long-term 
investments, which are successfully 
differentiated by the constant innovation and 
quality of our product. Successfully acquiring 
land, building quality homes and selling and 
handing them over on time, are all critical 
success factors and feature as part of our 
management incentive programmes. 

We adopt clear, simple and market competitive 
remuneration arrangements. The alignment of 
executive remuneration with the objectives of 
our shareholders has been the principal focus, 
ensuring remuneration structures are fully 
attuned to the business strategy. We aim to 
balance the short, medium and long term 
components of our remuneration, to ensure 
that we motivate and retain our executives and 
keep them focused on delivering long term, 
sustainable growth. The annual bonus 
encourages performance in key areas of 
strategic focus for the business and the Long 
Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) reflects our market 
related growth and return ambitions. 

Based on these principles, our remuneration 
framework, as codified in our Remuneration 
Policy, includes the following components: 

Fixed components

Variable components 

Salary

Benefits

Pension

Annual Bonus

LTIP

–  Market competitive

–  Maximum 100% of salary

–  Maximum 100% of salary 

–   Reflect nature of role, and skills  

–   Balanced scorecard of key performance 

–   Based on stretching long-term EPS  

and experience 

measures – PBT, ROCE, land bank,  
order book

and ROCE targets

–   Subject to clawback for five years  

–   50% deferred into shares – half vest  

following vesting

after one year and half after two years 

–   Cash and shares subject to clawback for  
five years following payment / vesting

–  100% of salary to be built up over five years from appointment

Shareholding guidelines

Shareholder Engagement
We remain committed to an ongoing and 
transparent dialogue with our shareholders on 
the issue of executive remuneration. In putting 
in place our current policy, I engaged with a 
number of our major shareholders and their 
valuable feedback was taken into account by 
the Committee in finalising the policy. 

At the Annual General Meeting in November 
2015, the Annual Report on Remuneration will 
be put to an advisory vote. The year ended 
30 June 2015 was a great year of progress for 
Redrow and in this context, we look forward to 
receiving your support on our approach to 
remuneration at the Annual General Meeting.

Debbie Hewitt
Chairman of the Remuneration Committee

We will continue to keep our policies under 
review to ensure they remain appropriate in 
the face of evolving best practice, regulatory 
developments and market data. 

2015 Outcomes – Aligned to  
Strong Performance
As described in detail on pages 3 to 55 of  
this Annual Report, 2015 was an outstanding 
year for Redrow, which saw:

•  Record profits of £204m before tax

•  Legal completions increasing by 12%

•  Record turnover of £1.15bn, up 33%

•  Underlying EPS increasing to 44.5p

•  ROCE increasing to 22.8%

•  Closing private order book increasing  

to £524m

•  c.5,900 plots added to the current land bank

The alignment between performance and 
reward which underpins our executive 
remuneration framework is reflected in the 
outcomes for the annual bonus and LTIP:

•  Based on exceptional performance, with the 
targets for maximum payment exceeded for 
all four of the annual bonus measures (PBT, 
ROCE, land bank, order book), the Committee 
determined that the annual bonus should pay 
out at the maximum level of 100% of salary 
for all of the Executive Directors. 50% of this 
will be paid in shares and half of these will be 
deferred for a period of one year and the 
remaining half deferred for two years; and

•  EPS of 44.5p and ROCE of 22.8% in 2015 
were both significantly above the targets  
for maximum vesting of 30.0p and 18%, 
respectively. The Committee therefore 
determined that the 2012 LTIP award  
should vest in full on 23 October 2015. 

The Committee has considered and re-
affirmed the policy that, given the highly 
competitive nature of the sector, annual 
bonus performance targets remain 
commercially sensitive immediately following 
the year end. Therefore, subject to the 
Committee determining that they are no 
longer commercially sensitive, it is intended 
that bonus targets will be disclosed on a two 
year delayed basis. In line with this policy, the 
targets for 2015 will be disclosed in the 2017 
report, and this report contains the bonus 
targets for the 2013 financial year.

Remuneration Decision for 2016
The Committee has decided to award salary 
increases to the Chairman, Chief Executive  
and Finance Director in line with all other 
employees, in line with our Policy. Salary 
increases of 2.8% for the Chairman, Chief 
Executive and the Finance Director will be 
effective from 1 July 2015. 

The annual bonus and LTIP will operate in  
line with the Policy. The EPS and ROCE target 
ranges for the 2016 LTIP award are set out  
on page 78 of this report.

70

71

This report has been prepared in accordance with the UK Corporate Governance Code, the relevant provisions of the  
Listing Rules and Schedule 8 of the Large and Medium-sized Companies and Groups (Accounts and Reports) (Amendment) Regulations 2013.

Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Strategic ReportGovernance ReportFinancial StatementsShareholder InformationDIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION REPORT CONTINUED

REMUNERATION POLICY
The Remuneration Policy became effective following shareholder approval at the 2014 Annual General Meeting. An extract of the remuneration 
policy table (with updated references, where relevant) and supporting disclosures is re-produced below for information only. The full Remuneration 
Policy is contained on pages 62 to 68 of the 2014 Annual Report and Accounts which is available in the investor relations section of the Group’s 
website, http://investors.redrowplc.co.uk/.

Policy Table for Executive Directors 

Component

Purpose / link to strategy Operation

Maximum

Performance framework

Base 
salary

To provide a market 
competitive element 
of fixed remuneration 
to attract and retain 
leaders of the required 
calibre to deliver  
the strategy. 

Salaries are determined by the Committee 
taking into account all relevant factors such  
as: the size and complexity of the Company, 
the scope and responsibilities of the role,  
the skills and experience of the individual  
and performance in role. 

The Committee’s assessment of the 
competitive market positioning of base salaries 
is based on consideration of market data from 
UK companies of similar size and complexity, 
and companies in the house-building sector. 

Salaries are normally reviewed annually,  
with any changes effective at the start of  
the financial year. 

There is no prescribed 
maximum salary. Any salary 
increases will normally be  
in line with those of the  
wider workforce. 

The Committee has discretion 
to award larger increases 
where it considers this 
appropriate, such as to  
reflect (for example):

–  a significant change in  

the size and complexity  
of the Company;

–  an increase in scope and 

Salaries effective from 1 July 2015 are shown 
on page 76 of the Annual Remuneration Report. 

responsibility of the role,  
or a change in role;

–  an Executive Director being 

moved to market positioning 
over time; and

–  an Executive Director falling 
below competitive market 
positioning.

Benefit provision, for  
which there is no prescribed 
monetary maximum, is set  
at an appropriate level for  
the specific nature and  
location of the role. 

Participation in all employee 
share plans is subject to 
statutory limits. 

Benefits

To provide a market 
competitive benefits 
package to support  
the Director in 
fulfilling their role. 

Benefits may include: a company car (or 
equivalent cash allowance), private medical 
insurance, permanent health insurance,  
fixed term group income protection and  
a death in service benefit.

Executive Directors may also participate in 
all-employee share plans on the same basis  
as other employees. 

The Committee has discretion to include, 
where it considers it appropriate to do so,  
other benefits to reflect specific individual 
circumstances, such as housing, relocation, 
travel, or other expatriate allowances. 

N/A

N/A

Pension

To provide a market 
competitive element 
of fixed remuneration 
for retirement 
planning.

Individuals are eligible to participate in  
the Company’s Defined Contribution (DC) 
pension scheme or receive a pension  
allowance cash supplement. 

The maximum DC contribution 
/ cash supplement (in respect 
of a financial year) is 20% of 
base salary. 

N/A

Executive Directors who are members of  
the Company’s Defined Benefit (DB) pension 
scheme will continue to receive benefits  
under the terms of that scheme. There will  
be no new entrants or accrual of future  
benefits under the DB scheme.

Component

Purpose / link to strategy Operation

Maximum

Performance framework

Annual 
bonus 

A variable pay 
opportunity which 
motivates and rewards 
annual performance 
and delivery of  
the strategy on  
an annual basis.

Deferral aligns reward 
with long term value 
of Redrow shares.

Long Term 
Incentive 
Plan (LTIP)

Designed to motivate 
and reward long-term 
performance and 
delivery of the 
strategy, and provide 
alignment with 
Redrow shareholders. 

The Committee determines participation levels 
each year. Targets are set by the Committee at 
the start of the relevant financial year and are 
assessed following the year end. 

A portion (currently 50%) of any bonus earned 
will be deferred into Redrow shares, which are 
awarded in the form of nil-cost options which 
vest after a period set by the Committee. 
Currently, half of the deferred shares vests 
after one year and half after two years,  
subject to continued employment. 

Following exercise of a vested deferred share 
award, participants will be entitled to receive 
an amount equal to the aggregate of any 
dividends which they would have been 
entitled to receive as a shareholder during  
the period between the grant and satisfaction 
of the award.

In future years, the Committee retains the 
discretion to change the deferred amount  
and / or lengthen the deferral period. 

Where appropriate, the Committee may 
determine that deferral is in the form of an 
equivalent cash award (which in all other 
respects mirrors the terms of the deferred 
share awards).

Clawback provisions apply to both the cash  
and deferred elements (see section below).

Awards may be made under the Redrow plc 
2014 Long Term Incentive Plan (LTIP). 

Awards are normally in the form of nil-cost 
options and vest subject to the satisfaction of 
performance conditions measured over a period 
of at least three years. 

The Committee may also determine that 
awards are made in the form of conditional 
share awards or as an equivalent cash award 
(which in all other respects mirrors the terms  
of the LTIP). 

Clawback provisions apply (see section below).

Awards under the 2014 LTIP may incorporate 
the right to receive (in cash or shares) the 
aggregate value of dividends paid on vested 
shares between the vesting date and the date 
on which the awards are satisfied, on such basis 
as the Committee may determine, which may 
assume the reinvestment of these dividends in 
shares on a cumulative basis.

Dividend amounts are not paid on any awards 
until such time as the performance conditions 
are achieved and shares vest.

100% of salary

Performance is assessed against key 
financial and operational performance 
measures linked to the delivery of the 
strategy and shareholder value 
determined each year by the Committee. 

The current performance measures are 
disclosed on page 76 of the Annual 
Remuneration Report.

The Committee retains discretion to 
adjust the measures and / or weightings 
in future years to reflect prevailing 
financial, strategic and operational 
objectives of the business or of the 
individual. However, a minimum of 50% 
of the total will always be based on key 
financial measures.

The Committee has discretion to adjust 
the level of pay out if the outcome from 
a formulaic assessment does not 
appropriately reflect underlying 
business performance. 

The maximum award 
which may be granted 
in respect of a 
financial year will 
normally not exceed 
100% of salary. 

The LTIP is based on performance 
measures aligned to the creation of 
long-term shareholder value, measured 
over a performance period of at least 
three years. The current performance 
measures are:

However, in 
exceptional 
circumstances only, 
the Committee may 
make awards of up  
to 200% of salary.

•  50% based on earnings per share 

(EPS); and

•  50% based on return on capital 

employed (ROCE)

For threshold performance, 20%  
of the maximum vests.

The Committee retains discretion  
to include additional or alternative 
financial performance measures and / 
or adjust the weightings in future years 
to reflect prevailing strategic or 
operational objectives of the business 
aligned with shareholder value creation. 

Performance conditions applicable to 
2015 LTIP awards may be amended  
if an event occurs which causes the 
Committee to consider that an 
amended performance condition  
would be more appropriate and not 
materially less difficult to satisfy. 

72

73

Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Strategic ReportGovernance ReportFinancial StatementsShareholder InformationDIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION REPORT CONTINUED

Where an individual waives any current or future right or entitlement to a remuneration payment or other benefit which he would otherwise be 
eligible to receive under any of the components set out in the Policy Table on pages 72 and 73, the Committee may determine that a charitable 
donation, which is, in its opinion, equivalent to the value of that payment or benefit, may be made by the Company.

ANNUAL REMUNERATION REPORT 
The tables below set out the remuneration for the Directors in respect of 2015. Further discussion of each of the components, including the intended 
operation of the policy for 2016, is set out on the pages which follow. Where indicated, these disclosures have been audited. 

The Committee reserves the right to make any remuneration payments and payments for loss of office (including exercising any discretions available 
to it in connection with such payments) notwithstanding that they are not in line with the Remuneration Policy set out above where the terms of 
the payment were agreed (i) before the Remuneration Policy came into effect or (ii) at a time when the relevant individual was not a director of the 
Company and, in the opinion of the Committee, the payment was not in consideration for the individual becoming a director of the Company. For 
these purposes “payments” includes the Committee satisfying awards of variable remuneration and, in relation to an award over shares, the terms  
of the payment are “agreed” at the time the award is granted.

The Committee may make minor amendments to the Remuneration Policy (for regulatory, exchange control, tax or administrative purposes or to 
take account of a change in legislation) without obtaining shareholder approval.

Clawback
For awards under the annual bonus plan (including deferred share awards) made in respect of the 2015 financial year onwards and awards under the 
2014 LTIP, the Committee has discretion to claw back awards in the event of a material misstatement of the Company’s audited financial results or 
employee misconduct. 

In such circumstances, at any time prior to the fifth anniversary of the payment of any cash bonus or vesting of a deferred bonus / LTIP award, the 
Committee has discretion to:

•  reduce, cancel or impose further conditions on outstanding deferred bonus / LTIP awards; or 

•  require the participant to repay (in cash or shares) some or all of the value delivered from a deferred bonus / LTIP awards; and / or

•  require the participant to repay some or all of any cash bonus received.

Where a charitable donation has been made in accordance with the Remuneration Policy, clawback will not apply. 

For deferred bonus plan awards granted in previous years, if a participant’s gross misconduct has resulted in the material misstatement of the  
Group accounts (or the accounts of one of its members), any unexercised awards will lapse immediately and the participant will forfeit any shares 
previously acquired under awards made under that plan. 

Service Contracts 
The service agreements of the Executive Directors are rolling contracts which were entered into on the dates shown in the table below. 

Name

Steve Morgan

John Tutte

Barbara Richmond

Contract date

Notice period from the Director

Notice period from the Company

01/01/11

01/07/14

18/01/10

6 months

12 months

6 months

6 months

12 months

12 months

The service agreements provide for formal notice to be served to terminate the agreement, by either the Company or the Executive Director,  
with the required period of notice shown in the table. The agreements do not include any provisions for pre-determined compensation for early 
termination. The Committee may terminate service agreements immediately by making a payment in lieu of notice consisting of base salary, 
benefits and pension for the unexpired period of notice. At the discretion of the Committee, this payment may be made as instalments over the 
period, subject to a duty to mitigate, or as a lump sum.

For future appointments, it is the Committee’s policy that notice periods will normally be 12 months from both the Director and the Company,  
and that payments in lieu of notice will comprise no more than base salary, benefits and pension only over the unexpired period of notice. 

The Non-Executive Directors’ terms of appointment are detailed in formal letters of appointment as shown in the table below. Each appointment  
is for a fixed initial period of three years although this term is terminable upon either party giving three months’ notice. 

Position

Date of initial appointment

Current date of appointment

Senior Independent Director 

Non-Executive

Non-Executive

Non-Executive

21/08/09

01/12/12

01/09/14

06/01/15

19/08/15

01/12/12

01/09/14

06/01/15

Name

Debbie Hewitt

Nick Hewson

Liz Peace

Sir Michael Lyons

74

Single Total Figure of Remuneration Table (audited)
The remuneration of the Executive Directors in respect of 2015 is shown in the table below (with the prior year comparative).

Salary

Benefits(ii)

Pension(iii)

Annual bonus(iv)

LTIP(v)

Total

£’000

2015

2014

2015

2014

2015

2014

2015

2014

2015

2014

2015

2014

Steve Morgan(i)

John Tutte

Barbara Richmond

15 

 540

 305

15

405

272

38 

 16

 15

22

16

15

–

 108

 61

–

81

54

–

540

305

–

405

272

–

1,004

670

–

939

626

53

2,208

1,356

37

1,846

1,239

(i) 

 Steve Morgan draws a nominal salary of £15k per annum which he donates via Payroll Giving to the Morgan Foundation, a UK registered charity of which Steve Morgan is a trustee.

 The Company also made a donation to the Morgan Foundation of £678k in respect of 2015 (2014: £654k). This donation amount is made up of a notional salary of £447k (being 
the balance of Steve Morgan’s notional salary of £462k less the £15k nominal salary) and £231k (being an amount in respect of the cash annual bonus which Steve Morgan waived 
his entitlement to). The notional cash bonus represents half of the total bonus for 2015, calculated using the notional salary of £462k and a bonus percentage of 100% of 
maximum, equivalent to that earned by John Tutte and Barbara Richmond). 

 The remaining half of Steve Morgan’s 2015 bonus amount (£231k) is deferred into cash awards over notional Redrow shares, and will become exercisable as described in footnote 
(iv) below. Steve Morgan’s 2012 LTIP award, also structured as a cash award over notional Redrow shares, will vest in full on 23 October 2015 based on performance to the 2015 
financial year (as described in the section below). The value of this award (calculated using the average share price over the last three months of 2015 in accordance with footnote 
(v) below) is £1,108k (2014: £1,065k). Steve Morgan currently intends to waive his entitlement to these awards at a future point (at any time during the relevant exercise period).  
A donation to the Morgan Foundation may be made by the Company of an amount equivalent to the cash value of the awards over notional Redrow shares at that time. Any such 
donation will be disclosed in the relevant remuneration report.

 Further details on the donation to the Morgan Foundation are given in the Directors’ report on page 85 and in note 22 to the financial statements.

(ii)  Benefits include a fully expensed company car (or equivalent cash allowance) and private health insurance.

(iii)  Pension includes the value of the cash allowance paid to John Tutte and Barbara Richmond in respect of the relevant year. 

(iv)   Annual bonus represents the full value of the bonus awarded in respect of the relevant financial year. Half of the bonus is deferred into Redrow shares, which vests in two tranches 
of 50% each, on the first and second anniversaries of the grant date, subject to continued employment. For Steve Morgan, deferral is in the form of cash awards over notional 
Redrow shares. 

(v) 

 LTIP represents the value of the LTIP award which vests in respect of a performance period ending in the relevant financial year. The 2015 column includes the value of the 2012 
LTIP award which will vest in full on 23 October 2015, using the average share price over the last three months of 2015. The 2014 column includes the vested value of the 2011 
LTIP award (which vested at 100% of maximum), based on the share price on the date of vesting (21 September 2014). 

The fees of the Non-Executive Directors in respect of 2015 are shown in the table below (with the prior year comparative). 

£’000

Alan Jackson (i)

Debbie Hewitt

Nick Hewson

Liz Peace(ii)

Sir Michael Lyons(iii)

(i)  Alan Jackson resigned on 1 September 2014

(ii)  Liz Peace was appointed to the Board on 1 September 2014

(iii)  Sir Michael Lyons was appointed to the Board on 6 January 2015

Fees

2015

17

68

45

38

22

2014

99

54

45

–

–

75

Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Strategic ReportGovernance ReportFinancial StatementsShareholder Information 
 
 
DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION REPORT CONTINUED

Key Components of Remuneration
The following sections describe how the Committee implemented key elements of the policy in 2015 and how the policy is intended to operate in 2016. 

Salary
The Committee’s policy on salary increases, as set out in the Remuneration Policy, is that they should normally be in line with increases for 
employees within the business. This approach has been applied consistently by the Committee over a number of years.

The average increase for all Redrow employees on 1 July 2015 was 3.86%. The Committee decided to award base salary increases for the Executive 
Directors of 2.8%, effective 1 July 2015, as follows:-

Steve Morgan

John Tutte

Barbara Richmond

2016

475

555

314

2015

462

540

305

Change

2.8%

2.8%

2.8%

Annual bonus
The maximum bonus opportunity for the Executive Directors during 2015 continued to be 100% of salary, in line with the Remuneration Policy. This 
was based on the achievement of stretching targets under a balanced scorecard of four equally weighted key performance measures. The scorecard 
combines measures which represent an appropriate balance between ‘backward looking’ financial performance (PBT and ROCE) and ‘forward looking’ 
strategic and operational measures (land bank and order book) which support shareholder value creation over the medium to long term. 

% of bonus opportunity 

Rationale

PBT

ROCE

Land bank

Order book

25%

25%

25%

25%

A fundamental measure of annual profitability

A measure of how effectively we use our capital base

Measures the foundation for our future success

A key indicator of medium term profitability

As described in detail on pages 3 to 55 of this Annual Report, 2015 was an outstanding year for Redrow. As a result of the targets for maximum 
payment being exceeded for all four of the measures, the Committee determined that the bonus should pay out at the maximum level, resulting in 
bonus awards to the Executive Directors as shown in the Single Total Figure of Remuneration on page 75. 

The Committee and Board of Redrow consider that, given the highly competitive nature of the sector, the annual bonus performance targets remain 
commercially sensitive in the period following the relevant financial year and it would therefore be inappropriate to disclose the targets at that point. 
Therefore, after careful consideration, the Committee’s policy on bonus target disclosure continues to be that, subject to the Committee determining 
that they are no longer commercially sensitive, it is intended that bonus targets will be disclosed in the Annual Remuneration Report on a two year 
delayed basis. Therefore, the targets for 2015 will be disclosed in the 2017 report. The targets from last year’s report (2014) will be disclosed next 
year (2016). In line with this policy, the Committee has confirmed that the targets for the 2013 annual bonus are no longer commercially sensitive 
and are therefore disclosed in the following table.

Long Term Incentive Plan (LTIP)
The LTIP is designed to motivate and reward long-term performance and delivery of the strategy and provide alignment with Redrow shareholders. 
The current policy is to make annual awards at the level of 100% of salary. 

The vesting of LTIP awards is based on performance of EPS and ROCE, pre-exceptional, with 50% relating to performance of each measure. 
The Committee believes that these two measures are transparent, are easy to understand, track and communicate, are cost effective to measure  
and fundamentally aligned to the strategic ambitions that have been communicated to the market:

•  EPS ensures that the team delivers strong ‘bottom line’ profitability and growth for shareholders; and

•  ROCE provides balance by requiring that profit is delivered efficiently from a capital perspective.

The Remuneration Committee has discretion to adjust the number of shares vesting from the award if it considers that performance in the metrics 
above is not sufficiently reflective of the general growth created by the market.

Steve Morgan’s awards under the LTIP are receivable in cash but in all other respects mirror the terms and conditions of the LTIP awarded to the other 
Executive Directors. 

The sections below summarise details of the LTIP awards which vested in respect of 2015 (2012 awards) and which were granted during the 2015 
financial year, both of which were made under the 2004 LTIP scheme. The final section provides details of awards which will be made during the 2016 
financial year under the 2014 LTIP scheme which was approved by shareholders at the 2014 AGM. 

LTIP awards vesting in respect of 2015 
The LTIP awards granted in September 2012 were based on performance over the three year performance period ending in 2015. Based on 
performance against the EPS and ROCE targets set when the award was granted, summarised in the table below, the Committee determined that the 
2012 LTIP awards will vest in full on 23 October 2015. The value of these vested awards is included in the 2015 LTIP column of the Single Total Figure 
of Remuneration on page 75. 

Award vesting level (for each component)

Nil

10%

30%

50%

Vesting between the points above is on a sliding scale basis

Actual performance

Vesting (% of total award)

EPS for 2014

ROCE for 2014

Below 24p

Below 14%

24p

27p

14%

16%

30p or above

18% or above

44.5p

50%

22.8%

50%

LTIP awards granted during 2015 
The LTIP awards granted in September 2014 will vest in September 2017 based on performance over the three year performance period ending in 
2017 as follows:

2013 Target range

Award vesting level (for each component)

PBT

ROCE

Land bank

Order book

Total

% of bonus 
opportunity

Threshold payout 
(10% of maximum)

Target payout  
(50% of maximum)

Maximum payout

Actual 2013 
performance

Payout (% of total 
bonus opportunity)

£60m

9.7%

£65m

10.7%

£70m

11.7%

£71m

12.2%

Based on a combination of targets for year-end active outlets and Gross 

92 active outlets/ 

Development Value purchased in the year

£1,175m GDV

£190m

£200m

£220m

£260m

25%

25%

25%

25%

100%

25%

25%

5%

25%

80%

Executive Directors are required to defer 50% of any bonus earned into shares, half of which will vest after one year and the remaining half after  
two years, subject to continued employment and clawback. Steve Morgan’s notional cash award is subject to the same deferral schedule. Clawback 
provisions for both the cash and deferred share elements will apply

For 2016, the annual bonus will operate on the same basis as for 2015, assessed using the same balanced scorecard of measures. In line with the 
policy outlined above, it is the current intention that the targets will be disclosed in the 2018 Annual Remuneration Report provided the Committee 
is comfortable they are no longer sensitive.

Nil

10%

30%

50%

Vesting between the points above is on a sliding scale basis

EPS for 2017

ROCE for 2017

Below 52p

Below 17.7%

52p

57.8p

17.7%

20.0%

63.6p or above

22.0% or above

76

77

Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Strategic ReportGovernance ReportFinancial StatementsShareholder InformationDIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION REPORT CONTINUED

Scheme Interests Awarded During 2015 (audited)
The following table sets out details of LTIP awards to Executive Directors during the 2015 financial year. 

Executive Director

Type of interest

Basis of award

Face value

Steve Morgan

John Tutte 

Barbara Richmond

LTIP (cash)

100% of salary

LTIP

LTIP

100% of salary

100% of salary

£462k

£540k

£305k

Threshold vesting  
(% of maximum)

End of performance period

20%

20%

20%

30 June 2017

30 June 2017

30 June 2017

Awards to John Tutte and Barbara Richmond are made in the form of nil-cost options. As described on page 77, awards to Steve Morgan are made in 
the form of cash which in all other respects mirror the terms of the awards to other directors. 

The face value has been calculated using the average share price used to determine the number of shares awarded, being 285p (the average, over the 
three days to the date of grant, 8 September 2014). 

Awards under the 2014 LTIP were made at 100% of the base salary for the current financial year in line with the rules of that scheme. 

LTIP awards to be granted during 2016 
Awards in the 2016 financial year will be made at the level of 100% of salary and will be subject to the following EPS and ROCE performance targets, 
measured over the three year period ending in 2018:

The table below provides details of the interests of the Executive Directors in incentive awards during the year.

Awards held 
at 1 July 2014

Grant date

Share  
price on 
grant 
£

Award  
vested

Awards 
granted  
in year

Awards 
exercised  
in year

Awards  
held at  
30 June 
2015

Exercise 
price 
£

From

To

9,453

15/11/2011

–  30/10/2014

0.95

2.76

–

–

–

(9,453)

–

0.95

01/01/15

01/07/15

8,163

–

8,163

2.21

01/01/18

01/07/18

323,834

21/09/2011

1.10

323,834

– (323,834)

–

246,164

23/10/2012

166,316

24/09/2013

–

08/09/2014

1.54

2.37

2.85

1.54

2.37

2.85

–

–

–

62,459

33,263

–

–

189,474

–

–

–

71,053

–

–

–

– 

–

–

246,164

166,316

189,474

62,459

66,526

71,053

Deferred bonus 2012

62,459

23/10/2012

Deferred bonus 2013

66,526

24/09/2013

Deferred bonus 2014

–

08/09/2014

John Tutte

SAYE 2012

SAYE 2015

LTIP 2011

LTIP 2012

LTIP 2013

LTIP 2014

874,752

419,556

268,690 (333,287) 810,155

4,545

11/11/2013

–

30/10/2014

2.48

2.76

–

–

–

4,081

–

–

4,545

4,081

1.98

01/01/17 

01/07/17

2.21

01/01/18

01/07/18

Award vesting level (for each component)

Nil

10%

30%

50%

Vesting between the points above is on a sliding scale basis

EPS for 2018

ROCE for 2018

Below 62.5p

Below 18.0%

62.5p

69.4p

18.0%

20.0%

76.3p or above

22.0% or above

Barbara Richmond

SAYE 2014

SAYE 2015

LTIP 2011

LTIP 2012

LTIP 2013

LTIP 2014

Shareholding guidelines and share interests
Under the shareholding guidelines, Executive Directors are expected to build and retain a shareholding in the Group at least equivalent to 100% of 
base salary. Following a review of the operation of the shareholding guidelines, the Committee has added a provision to the guidelines that the 
expected level of shareholding should be met within five years of appointment to the Board. As shown in the table below, all Executive Directors 
currently meet this guideline. Non-Executive Directors are not subject to a shareholding guideline. 

Statement of Shareholding and Scheme Interests (audited)
The following table sets out the shareholding (including connected persons) of the Directors in the Company as at 30 June 2015 and current interests 
in long-term incentives.

Executive Directors

Steve Morgan

John Tutte 

Barbara Richmond

Non-Executive Directors

Debbie Hewitt

Nick Hewson

Liz Peace

Sir Michael Lyons

Number of shares 
beneficially held at  
30 June 2015

Shareholding as  
% of salary 

Guideline met?

Yes

Yes

Yes

149,386,045

128,283%

220%

302%

299,621

231,954

21,605

19,000

3,400

–

Shareholding as a percentage of salary is calculated using the shareholding and base salary as at 1 July 2015 and the average share price for the final 
quarter of 2015.

1.54

2.37

2.85

1.54

2.37

2.85

1.54

2.37

2.85

1.54

2.37

2.85

215,889

21/09/2011

1.10

215,889

164,322

23/10/2012

111,579

24/09/2013

–

08/09/2014

–

–

–

107,018

–

–

–

–

–

41,693

22,316

–

47,719

(56,000) 159,889

–

–

–

–

–

–

164,322

111,579

107,018

41,693

44,632

47,719

582,660

279,898

158,818

(56,000) 685,478

Deferred bonus 2012

41,693

23/10/2012

Deferred bonus 2013

44,632

24/09/2013

Deferred bonus 2014

–

08/09/2014

Steve Morgan*

LTIP 2010

LTIP 2011

LTIP 2012

LTIP 2013

LTIP 2014

78,625

18/02/2011

1.30

–

367,012

21/09/2011

1.10

367,012

271,739

23/10/2012

183,158

24/09/2013

–

08/09/2014

–

–

–

–

162,105

–

–

–

78,246

–

–

–

68,948

36,632

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

78,625

367,012

271,739

183,158

162,105

137,897

73,263

78,246

Deferred bonus 2012

137,897

23/10/2012

Deferred bonus 2013

73,263

24/09/2013

Deferred bonus 2014

–

08/09/2014

1,111,694

472,592

240,351

– 1,352,045

* 

(i) 

(ii) 

All scheme interests held by Steve Morgan are receivable in cash on terms which in all other respects mirror those for other Executive Directors. 

 The performance conditions attached to 2010 LTIP awards were EPS, ROCE and TSR over the three year performance period to 2014.  
As disclosed in the 2013 Directors’ remuneration report, these awards vested at 19% of maximum on 18 February 2014.

 The performance conditions attached to 2011 LTIP awards are EPS and ROCE over the three year performance period to 2014.  
As disclosed in the 2014 Directors’ remuneration report, these awards vested in full on 21 September 2014.

(iii)   The performance conditions attached to 2012 LTIP awards are EPS and ROCE over the three year performance period to 2015.  

As disclosed on page 77, these awards will vest in full on 23 October 2015. 

(iv)  The performance conditions attached to 2013 LTIP awards were disclosed in the 2014 Directors’ remuneration report.

(v)  The performance conditions attached to the 2014 LTIP awards are shown on page 77.

(vi)  There are no further performance conditions attached to the exercise of the deferred bonus awards.

(vii)   Between 1 July 2015 and 7 September 2015 (being the latest practicable date prior to the posting of this report), there were no  

further changes to the directors’ interests set out in the Statement of shareholding and scheme interests above.

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

21/09/14

20/09/21

23/10/15

22/10/22

24/09/16

24/09/23

08/09/17

08/09/24

23/10/13

22/10/22

24/09/14

24/09/23

08/09/15

08/09/24

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

21/09/14

20/09/21

23/10/15

22/10/22

24/09/16

24/09/23

08/09/17

08/09/24

23/10/13

22/10/22

24/09/14

24/09/23

08/09/15

08/09/24

18/02/14

19/04/21

21/09/14

20/09/21

23/10/15

22/10/22

24/09/16

24/09/23

08/09/17

08/09/24

23/10/13

22/10/22

24/09/14

24/09/23

08/09/15

08/09/24

78

79

Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Strategic ReportGovernance ReportFinancial StatementsShareholder InformationDIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION REPORT CONTINUED

Pension
John Tutte is a deferred member of the Redrow Staff Pension Scheme (now closed to future accrual) and details of entitlements under this plan  
are set out below. He also receives a pension allowance supplement of 20% of salary. Barbara Richmond receives a pension allowance supplement 
equivalent to 20% of salary. The value of these cash supplements is included in the pension column of the Single Total Figure of Remuneration  
Table on page 75. John Tutte and Barbara Richmond are also covered by fixed term group income protection and death in service benefit.

Steve Morgan is a pensioner member of the Redrow Staff Pension Scheme.

Total Pension Entitlements (audited)
Details of the Executive Directors’ pension entitlements under the defined benefit section of the Redrow Staff Pension Scheme are as follows:

Director

John Tutte

Normal retirement date

Accrued benefit  
at 30 June 2015 
£ 

Benefits paid to 
Director during period 
up to 30 June 2015 
£

Defined Benefit  
accrued during period 
up to 30 June 2015 
£

24 June 2021

53,487

Nil

Nil

The normal retirement date shows the date at which the director can retire without actuarial reduction. No additional benefit is available on 
early retirement.

The accrued pension shown above is the amount of pension entitlement that would be paid each year on retirement on the normal retirement  
date, based on service to 29 February 2012. The Scheme closed the accrual of future benefits with effect from 1 March 2012.

Non-Executive Director Fee Policy
Debbie Hewitt was appointed Senior Independent Director on 1 September 2014 and received an increase from £55k to £70k in recognition of the 
increased responsibility and time commitment. Nick Hewson continues to receive a fee of £45k. Liz Peace and Sir Michael Lyons joined in 2015 and 
are each paid £45k. 

Supporting Disclosures and Additional Context
Percentage change in remuneration of Group Chief Executive
The table below shows the percentage change in the salary, benefits and annual bonus of the Group Chief Executive and of all Redrow employees 
who qualify for participation in the Company’s bonus and benefits plans between 2014 and 2015. 

Salary

Benefits

Annual bonus

Group Chief Executive

All Redrow employees

33.3%*

nil%

33.3%

4.2%

10%

-1%

* 

Reflects the change in role and substantial increase in remit and responsibilities on John Tutte’s promotion to Group Chief Executive with effect from 1 July 2014.

Relative importance of spend on pay
The chart below shows total employee remuneration and distributions to shareholders, in respect of 2015 and 2014 (and the difference between 
the two). 

£m

Total employee remuneration

Distributions to shareholders 

2015

81

22

2014

62

11

Change (%)

+31%

+100%

Total employee remuneration represents amounts included in note 7a to the accounts in respect of wages, social security, pension and incentive 
costs for all Group employees. Distributions to shareholders include the total dividend in respect of each financial year (see note 5 to the accounts). 
This represents 6 pence per share in respect of 2015 compared to 3 pence per share in respect of 2014 and 1 pence per share in respect of 2013 when 
dividends were reintroduced.

Performance graph and table
The chart below shows the TSR of Redrow in the five year period to 30 June 2015 against the TSR of the FTSE 250 and FTSE Small Cap. TSR refers to 
share price growth with re-invested dividends. The Committee believes the FTSE 250 and FTSE Small Cap indices are the most appropriate indices 
against which the TSR of Redrow should be measured.

Redrow
FTSE 250
FTSE Smalll Cap

350

300

250

200

150

100

50

)
0
0
1
o
t
d
e
s
a
b
-
e
r
(
n
r
u
t
e
r

l

r
e
d
o
h
e
r
a
h
s

l
a
t
o
T

0

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Year ended 30 June

The table below provides remuneration data for the Chairman/Group Chief Executive (as applicable) for each of the six financial years  
over the equivalent period. 

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Name

Steve Morgan

Steve Morgan

Steve Morgan

Steve Morgan

Steve Morgan

John Tutte

Remuneration / donations*

Bonus (% of Maximum)

LTIP vesting (% of Maximum)

£592k

52%

0%

£582k

50%

0%

£855k

100%

0%

£1,050k 

£1,922k

£2,208k

80%

19%

100%

100%

100%

100%

* 

 For Steve Morgan, this value includes the nominal salary and benefits disclosed in the Single Total Figure of Remuneration Table as well as Company donations to the Morgan 
Foundation, a UK registered charity of which Steve Morgan is a trustee, reflecting notional salary and waived annual cash bonus in respect of the relevant year, as disclosed in the 
footnotes to the Single Total Figure of Remuneration Table and in the Directors’ report on page 85 and in note 22 to the financial statements. It also includes the value of deferred 
bonus and vested LTIP cash awards in respect of each relevant year (calculated in accordance with the methodology applicable to the Single Total Figure of Remuneration Table).

80

81

Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Strategic ReportGovernance ReportFinancial StatementsShareholder Information 
 
 
 
 
DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION REPORT CONTINUED

External non-executive directorships held by Executive Directors
It is the Committee’s policy that, with the approval of the Board, Executive Directors may hold one non-executive directorship at another company in 
order to broaden their knowledge and experience to the benefit of the Company. The Executive Director may retain any fee received for these duties. 

Barbara Richmond is a non-executive director of Lonza Group Ltd and in line with the committee’s policy, she is entitled to retain the fees from  
this appointment. She received fees of £0.2m during 2015. 

Consideration of directors’ remuneration – Remuneration Committee and advisors
The Remuneration Committee is comprised solely of Non-Executive Directors and comprises Debbie Hewitt as Chairman, Nick Hewson,  
Liz Peace and Sir Michael Lyons. 

The Committee has agreed Terms of Reference detailing its authority and responsibilities. The Terms of Reference of the Committee are kept  
under regular review and are published on the Group’s website and include:

•  determining the Remuneration Policy in respect of the Executive Directors and the Company secretary (together “the Senior Executives”),  

taking into account the context of the Company’s overall approach to remuneration for all employees and within this Policy determining the  
total individual package of each Senior Executive;

•  determining performance targets and the extent of their achievement for both annual and long term incentive awards operated by the  

Company affecting Senior Executives; and

•  monitoring and approving the level and structure of remuneration of the Managing Directors immediately below the Senior Executives.

The Committee meets as often as is required but at least twice per year. The Committee met three times during the course of the financial year  
ended 30 June 2015 and details of Committee attendance are set out in the table below.

Table of Attendance

Name

Debbie Hewitt

Nick Hewson

Liz Peace

Sir Michael Lyons

Role 

Chairman 

Member

Member

Member

Attendance at Meetings 

3/3

3/3

2/2

2/2

The Committee retained Deloitte LLP as independent advisor to the Committee during the year. Deloitte LLP was originally appointed by the 
Committee in 2010 following a selection process undertaken by the Committee. Deloitte LLP is a member of the Remuneration Consultants  
Group and as such voluntarily operates under the Code of Conduct in relation to executive remuneration consulting in the UK. The Committee is 
comfortable that the Deloitte LLP engagement partner and team, that provide remuneration advice to the Committee, do not have connections  
with Redrow plc that may impair their objectivity and independence. The fees charged by Deloitte LLP for the provision of independent advice to  
the Committee during 2015 were £16k. Deloitte LLP also provides the Company with tax advisory services but does not have any other connection 
with the Company.

Statement of voting at Annual General Meeting
At the Annual General Meeting held on 10 November 2014, votes cast by proxy and at the meeting in respect of directors’ remuneration are shown 
in the table. 

Votes For

Votes Against

Resolution 

No.

%

No.

Approval of Remuneration Policy

301,510,353

95.27

14,960,556

Approval of remuneration report  
for year ended 30 June 2014

286,195,229

90.46

30,191,285

%

4.73

9.54

Total votes cast

Votes Withheld

316,470,909

546,398

316,386,514

630,793

By order of the Board

Debbie Hewitt
Chairman of the Remuneration Committee

7 September 2015

82

83

The Richmond at Hartford Grange, Hartford, Cheshire

Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Strategic ReportGovernance ReportFinancial StatementsShareholder InformationDIRECTORS’ REPORT

The Directors have pleasure in presenting to 
the shareholders their report and audited 
consolidated financial statements for the 
12 months ended 30 June 2015.

Results and Dividends
The Group made a profit after tax of £162m 
(2014: £103m). An interim dividend of 2.0p 
(2014: 1.0p) per share was paid on 1 May 2015. 
The Board proposes to pay, subject to 
shareholder approval, at the 2015 Annual 
General Meeting, a final dividend of 4.0p (2014: 
final dividend: 2.0p) per share in respect of the 
year ended 30 June 2015 on 13 November 2015 
to shareholders on the Register as at the close 
of business on 25 September 2015. The 
dividend re-investment plan gives shareholders 
the opportunity to re-invest their dividends.

A review of the performance of the Group and 
its future prospects is included in the Strategic 
Report on pages 3 to 55. Details of the financial 
risk management objectives and policies and 
associated risk exposure is given in note 14: 
Financial risk management.

Annual General Meeting
Notice of the 2015 Annual General Meeting to 
be held on Tuesday, 10 November 2015 is set 
out on pages 125 to 128. Members wishing to 
vote should return forms of proxy to the 
Company’s Registrar not less than 48 hours 
before the time for holding the meeting. 

The Executive Directors have formal service 
agreements and termination of their 
employment may be effective by 12 months’ 
notice given by the Company, except for Steve 
Morgan where the notice period is six months.

In accordance with the UK Corporate 
Governance Code, all the Directors will retire 
at the Annual General Meeting to be held on 
Tuesday, 10 November 2015, and, being 
eligible, offer themselves for re-appointment. 

Directors Interests
Details of the Directors’ interests are shown  
in the Directors’ Remuneration Report on  
pages 70 to 83. Related party transactions  
are disclosed in note 22 to the Financial 
Statements. A summary of remuneration 
provided to key management personnel is 
provided in note 7.

Powers of the Directors
Subject to the Company’s Articles of 
Association, UK legislation and any of the 
directions given by Special Resolution, the 
business of the Company is managed by the 
Board, which may exercise all the powers of the 
Company. Directors have been authorised to 
allot and issue shares and to make market 
purchases of the Company’s ordinary shares 
and these powers may be exercised under 
authority and Resolutions of the Company 
passed at its Annual General Meeting. 

Corporate Governance
The Board remains committed to high standards 
of corporate governance, details relating to the 
Company’s compliance with the UK Corporate 
Governance Code are given in the Corporate 
Governance Report on pages 56 to 88.

Directors
The Directors of the Company during the year to 
the date of signing are listed on page 75 of the 
Directors’ Remuneration report and the current 
Directors are also listed, together with their 
biographical details on pages 60 to 61.

The rules in relation to the appointment and 
replacement of Directors are as set out in the 
Company’s Articles of Association. 

Capital Structure
The Company has an authorised share capital 
of 480,000,000 ordinary shares of 10p each of 
which 369,799,938 have been issued. The 
Company has one class of ordinary shares 
which carry ordinary rights to dividends 
(subject to the Company’s Articles of 
Association). Each share carries the right to one 
vote at general meetings of the Company.

Details of Directors pay, service contracts  
and Directors interests in the ordinary shares 
of the Company are included in the Director’s 
Remuneration Report on pages 70 to 83.

Formal appraisals of the Executive Directors 
were undertaken during the Financial Year. 
All the Non-Executive Directors underwent  
an annual appraisal conducted by the Senior 
Independent Non-Executive Director.  
The Board confirms that Steve Morgan, John 
Tutte and Barbara Richmond, who stand for 
re-appointment as Executive Directors and 
Debbie Hewitt, Nick Hewson, Liz Peace and Sir 
Michael Lyons who stand for re-appointment 
as Non-Executive Directors, continue to be 
effective and demonstrate the appropriate 
commitment to their roles. 

84

No person has any special rights of control 
over the Company’s share capital and all  
issued shares are fully paid.

Authority was given to the Directors at last 
year’s Annual General Meeting to allot unissued 
shares up to an aggregate nominal amount of 
£12,326,665 equivalent to approximately 33% 
of the Company’s issued share capital and up to 
a further aggregate nominal amount of 
£12,326,665 in connection with an offer by way 
of a rights issue. The authority was not exercised 
during the year ending 30 June 2015 or prior to 
the date of this Report. The Company has no 
current intention of exercising the authority but 
nevertheless as this authority expires at the 
forthcoming Annual General Meeting the 

Directors will be seeking new authorities as  
set out in the Notice of Meeting.

Voting and Transfer of Shares
The Company’s Articles of Association do not 
contain any specific restrictions on the size  
of a shareholder’s holding or on the transfer  
of shares.

The Company is not aware of any  
agreements between shareholders that  
may result in restrictions on the transfer  
of securities and/or voting rights.

The Company’s Articles of Association do  
not contain and the Company is not aware of 
any restrictions on voting rights, including any 
limitations on voting rights of holders of a given 
percentage or number of votes, deadlines for 
exercising voting rights and arrangements by 
which the Company’s co-operation, financial 
rights carried by securities are held by a person 
other than the holder of the securities.

The voting rights attaching to the shares held 
by the Company’s Employee Benefit Trust are 
exercisable by Abacus Trust Company (Isle of 
Man), the Trustee of the Trust.

Substantial Holdings in the Company
As at 7 September 2015, the Company has 
been advised of the following notifiable 
interests of 3% or more in its ordinary shares:

149,386,045

Bridgemere Securities 
Limited (including  
Steve Morgan)
Toscafund Asset 
Management LLP
Schroders plc
FIL Limited
BlackRock Inc
Caledonia (Private) 
Investments Pty Limited 11,321,760

36,427,860
19,855,864
17,343,977
15,277,577

40.40%

9.85%
5.37%
4.69%
4.13%

3.06%

The persons set out in the table above have 
notified the Company pursuant to Rule 5 of  
the Disclosure and Transparency Rules of  
their interests in the ordinary share capital  
of the Company.

At 7 September 2015, no change in these 
holdings had been notified, nor, according  
to the registrar of members, did any other 
shareholder at that date have a notifiable 
holding of issued share capital.

Employees 
The Company’s employment policies do not 
discriminate between employees or potential 
employees on the grounds of gender, sexual 
orientation, age, colour, creed, ethnic origin, 
religious beliefs, pregnancy or maternity  
or trade union membership. It is Company  
policy to give full and fair consideration to 
applications for employment by, and the 
employment needs of disabled persons (and  

in the case of employment needs, persons 
who become disabled whilst employed by  
the Company) where requirements may be 
adequately covered by these persons and  
to comply with any current legislation  
with regard to disabled persons. 

The Company places considerable importance 
on the provision of training and development; 
training@redrow, a purpose built in-house 
training facility at Tamworth, completed  
3,859 training days during the year ended  
30 June 2015, including those which support 
the Company’s induction process.

The Directors recognise the importance of 
good communications with employees. The 
Divisions are encouraged to make their 
employees aware of the financial and economic 
factors affecting their respective Divisions and 
the Company as a whole. This is assisted 
through the medium of regular management 
meetings, staff publications, its internal staff 
‘InSight Magazine’ and the Redrow intranet.
Employees are consulted on a regular basis  
so that employee views may be taken into 
account when decisions are made that  
may affect their interests.

Employee share ownership is encouraged 
through savings related schemes.

Charitable and Political Donations
The Company made no political donations  
but paid £0.8m in charitable donations during 
the year, being £0.7m in respect of national 
charities and £0.1m in support of local 
charities. The Company and its employees are 
actively involved in fundraising activities for 
specific charities. The Company made a £0.7m 
donation during the year to the Morgan 
Foundation, a UK registered charity of which 
Steve Morgan is a Trustee. This is included 
within the charitable donations in respect of 
national charities noted above. 

Research and Development
The Company has a centralised Product 
Development Team charged with identifying  
and evaluating new construction techniques and 

products. In addition, the Company has a 
centralised Environmental and Sustainability 
Team, of which issues play a prominent role in the 
Company’s activities. The Company recognises  
its responsibilities to the community as a whole 
 and has adopted an environment strategy which 
is a core part of the Company’s objectives. 

The charge to the income statement in respect of 
research and development in the year was £1m.

Greenhouse Gas Emissions
This disclosure in the table below includes  
all of the emission sources required under the 
Companies Act 2006 (Strategic Report and 
Directors’ Report) Regulations 2013. These 
sources fall within our consolidated financial 
statement and we do not have responsibility  
for any emission sources that are not included  
in our consolidated statement.

This inventory of greenhouse gas emissions has 
been verified by SGS to a limited level of 
assurance, in accordance with ISO 14064-3:2006, 
as meeting the requirements of The Greenhouse 
Gas Protocol - A Corporate Accounting and 
Reporting Standard. Emissions have been 
calculated using the UK Government’s GHG 
Conversion Factors for Company Reporting: 
2014 and 2015 respectively.

Independent Auditors
A resolution to reappoint Pricewaterhouse 
Coopers LLP as external Auditors will be 
proposed at the Annual General Meeting on 
Tuesday, 10 November 2015.

Provision of Information to Auditors:
In the case of each Director in office at  
the date the Directors report is approved, 
confirm that:

(a) 

(b) 

 so far as the Director is aware, there is no 
relevant audit information of which the 
Company’s Auditors are unaware; and 

 he has taken all of the steps that he 
ought to have taken as a Director in order 
to make himself aware of any relevant 
audit information and to establish that 
the Company’s Auditors are aware of  
that information. 

Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Greenhouse gas emissions data for the year 1 July 2014 to 30 June 2015.

Going Concern
The Directors have acknowledged the  
guidance on going concern and financial 
reporting published by the Financial  
Reporting Council in October 2009.

As explained in the Financial Review on pages 
34 to 37, the Group maintains adequate 
committed banking facilities. As stated in note 
14 to the financial statements, at 30 June 2015, 
the Group had £215m of undrawn committed 
borrowing facilities available. 

After making appropriate enquiries, the 
Directors consider they have a reasonable 
expectation for stating that the Group and the 
Company have adequate resources to continue 
trading for the foreseeable future. These 
enquiries consisted of a detailed review the 
Group’s financial forecast for the period to  
31 December 2016. The forecasts take into 
account current market trends with reasonable 
judgements and estimates applied to arrive at 
future cash flow estimates. As part of the 
review, the Group analysed its forecast 
covenant compliance over this period linked to 
its banking facility, arriving at an assessment of 
the headroom evident between the forecast 
covenant test outturn and the outturn 
necessary to achieve covenant compliance.  
The review confirmed headroom within both 
financial covenants and facilities.

Accordingly, they continue to adopt the  
going concern basis in preparing the  
financial statements.

By order of the Board

Graham Cope
Company Secretary  
Redrow plc 
Registered no: 2877315

7 September 2015

Emissions from:
Scope 1 activities:
•  Combustion of fuel at our offices and sites
•  Business use of Redrow-owned and leased vehicles
Scope 2 activities:
• All purchased electricity
Total Greenhouse gas emissions:
• (Scope 1 + Scope 2)

Our preferred intensity ratio: 
Total Greenhouse gas emissions relative to build:

Current Reporting Year  
(1 July 14 to 30 June 15)

Comparison Year  
(1 July 13 to 30 June 14)

Units

8,636

2,899

11,535

2.57

7,240

2,770

tonnes of CO2e

tonnes of CO2e

10,010

tonnes of CO2e

2.64

tonnes of CO2e per 100m2 of build

85

Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Strategic ReportGovernance ReportFinancial StatementsShareholder InformationStrategic Report

Governance Report

Financial Statements

Shareholder Information

Riverside View, Lancaster, Lancashire

86

87

Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Redrow plc Annual Report 2015NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUEDS TAT E M E N T   O F   D I R E C TO R S ’   R E S P O N S I B I L I T I E S

I N D E P E N D E N T   AU D I TO R S ’   R E P O RT
TO THE MEMBERS OF REDROW plc

The Directors are responsible for preparing the Annual Report, the 
Directors’ Remuneration report and the financial statements in 
accordance with applicable law and regulations.

Company law requires the Directors to prepare financial statements for 
each Financial Year. Under that law, the Directors have prepared the 
Group and parent company financial statements in accordance with 
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as adopted by the 
European Union. Under company law, the Directors must not approve 
the financial statements unless they are satisfied that they give a true 
and fair view of the state of affairs of the Group and the Company and 
of the profit or loss of the Group for that period. In preparing these 
financial statements, the Directors are required to:

•  select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently; 

•  make judgements and accounting estimates that are reasonable  

and prudent;

•  state whether applicable IFRS as adopted by the European Union have 

been followed, subject to any material departures disclosed and 
explained in the financial statements; and

•  prepare the financial statements on the going concern basis unless it is 
inappropriate to presume that the Company will continue in business.

Each of the Directors, whose names and functions are listed below, 
confirms that, to the best of their knowledge:

•  the Group financial statements, which have been prepared in 

accordance with IFRS as adopted by the EU, give a true and fair view 
of the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit of the Group; and 

•  the Strategic Report contained on pages 3 to 55 includes a fair review 
of the development and performance of the business and the position 
of the Group, together with a description of the principal risks and 
uncertainties that it faces.

The Directors of Redrow plc as at the date of this statement are:

Steve Morgan, Chairman 
John Tutte, Group Chief Executive  
Barbara Richmond, Group Finance Director 
Debbie Hewitt, Senior Independent Non-Executive Director 
Nick Hewson, Non-Executive Director 
Liz Peace, Non-Executive Director 
Sir Michael Lyons, Non-Executive Director

By order of the Board

The Directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting records 
that are sufficient to show and explain the Company’s transactions and 
disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of 
the Company and the Group and enable them to ensure that the 
financial statements and the Directors’ Remuneration report comply 
with the Companies Act 2006 and, as regards the Group financial 
statements, Article 4 of the IAS Regulation. They are also responsible for 
safeguarding the assets of the Company and the Group and hence for 
taking reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and 
other irregularities.

Graham Cope
Company Secretary 

7 September 2015

Redrow plc 
Redrow House 
St. David’s Park  
Flintshire 
CH5 3RX

The Directors are responsible for the maintenance and integrity of the 
Company’s website. Legislation in the United Kingdom governing the 
preparation and dissemination of financial statements may differ from 
legislation in other jurisdictions. 

The Directors consider that the Annual Report, taken as a whole, is fair, 
balanced and understandable and provides the information necessary 
for shareholders to assess the Company’s performance, business model 
and strategy. 

Report on the financial statements

Our opinion
In our opinion Redrow plc’s Group financial statements and Company financial statements (the “financial statements”):

•  give a true and fair view of the state of the Group’s and of the Company’s affairs as at 30 June 2015 and of the Group’s profit and the Group’s and 

the Company’s cash flows for the year then ended;

•  the Group financial statements have been properly prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRSs”) as adopted 

by the European Union;

•  the Company financial statements have been properly prepared in accordance with IFRSs as adopted by the European Union and as applied in 

accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act 2006; and

•  the financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006 and, as regards the Group financial 

statements, Article 4 of the IAS Regulation.

What we have audited
The financial statements comprise:

•  the Group and Company balance sheets as at 30 June 2015;

•  the Group income statement and the Group and Company statements of comprehensive income for the year then ended;

•  the Group and Company statements of cash flows for the year then ended;

•  the Group and Company statements of changes in equity for the year then ended;

•  the accounting policies; and

•  the notes to the financial statements, which include other explanatory information.

Certain required disclosures have been presented elsewhere in the Annual Report, rather than in the notes to the financial statements. These are 
cross-referenced from the financial statements and are identified as audited.

The financial reporting framework that has been applied in the preparation of the financial statements is applicable law and IFRSs as adopted by  
the European Union and, as regards the company financial statements, as applied in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act 2006.

Materiality

Our audit approach
Overview
•  Overall group materiality: £10 million which represents 5% of profit before tax.

•  We performed an audit of the complete financial information of the Group.

Audit scope

Areas  
of focus

•  Net realisable value of inventories.

•  Valuation of pension scheme deficit.

The scope of our audit and our areas of focus
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK and Ireland) (“ISAs (UK & Ireland)”).

We designed our audit by determining materiality and assessing the risks of material misstatement in the financial statements. In particular, we looked 
at where the directors made subjective judgements, for example in respect of significant accounting estimates that involved making assumptions and 
considering future events that are inherently uncertain. As in all of our audits we also addressed the risk of management override of internal controls,  
including evaluating whether there was evidence of bias by the directors that represented a risk of material misstatement due to fraud. 

The risks of material misstatement that had the greatest effect on our audit, including the allocation of our resources and effort, are identified as 
“areas of focus” in the table on page 90. We have also set out how we tailored our audit to address these specific areas in order to provide an opinion 
on the financial statements as a whole, and any comments we make on the results of our procedures should be read in this context. This is not a 
complete list of all risks identified by our audit. 

88

89

Strategic ReportGovernance ReportFinancial StatementsShareholder InformationRedrow plc Annual Report 2015Redrow plc Annual Report 2015I N D E P E N D E N T   AU D I TO R S ’   R E P O RT   C O N T I N U E D
TO THE MEMBERS OF REDROW plc

Area of focus

How our audit addressed the area of focus

Net realisable value of inventories
See the Accounting Policies and Financial Risk Management sections  
for the directors’ disclosures of related accounting policies and key 
accounting estimates. See note 13 for the detailed disclosures on  
the inventory provision.

Exceptional net realisable value provisions were created in 2008 and 
2009 against the value of inventories, represented by land and work-in-
progress. £28 million of these provisions remain at the year end in 
relation to pre 2009 sites which have not yet completed. This constitutes 
the whole inventory provision as at the year end. The calculation of this 
provision involves a number of estimates, the most significant of which 
are forecast movements in the sales prices of plots and expected build 
costs. These assumptions could have a significant impact on the level of 
provisions recognised.

The carrying value of the remaining inventory balance is subject to 
estimates, in particular over the likelihood of planning consent being 
granted for the proposed developments. As this can have a significant 
impact on whether the value of the land is impaired, this is also an area 
of focus for us.

Valuation of pension scheme deficit
See the Accounting Policies and Financial Risk Management sections  
for the directors’ disclosures of related accounting policies and key 
accounting estimates. See note 7 for the detailed disclosures on the 
pension scheme deficit.

The Group operates a defined benefit pension scheme with a net deficit 
of £3 million at the year end. This deficit is derived from assets with a 
gross value of £103 million less the present value of obligations of £106 
million, both of which are significant in the context of the overall balance 
sheet and the result of the Group.

The valuation of this net liability is dependent on the application of 
significant judgements in the actuarial assumptions, in particular 
discount rates, future Retail Price Index (‘RPI’) inflation and mortality 
rates, and on the expected returns on investments.

Unfavourable changes in any of the key actuarial assumptions could  
lead to a material increase in the calculated net liability.

The pension scheme assets are invested in a mixture of pooled funds, 
individual equities, government and corporate bonds and cash.

For sites impacted by the exceptional net realisable value provisions, 
we compared forecast sales prices to actual prices achieved post 
year-end and assessed the accuracy of management’s historical 
forecasts by comparing net realisable values recognised in the prior 
year with actual sales prices achieved in the current year. We assessed 
expected market trends with reference to independent third party 
house price indices and our independently formed assumption. We also 
identified and tested any significant differences between budgeted and 
actual build costs recognised in the year. We did not identify any 
material differences between management’s estimations and actual 
results or independent indices.

We tested management’s controls over the process for estimating the 
expected remaining build costs, including the budgeting and review 
processes. We also inspected evidence of the Board’s review of forecast 
sales prices used in this provision model. We did not identify any 
significant deficiencies of control in this process.

We performed sensitivity analysis to identify the impact that changes  
in key assumptions, notably the overall market house price variance 
assumption, have on the provision calculation in challenging 
management on the overall levels of provisioning. We also considered 
the adequacy of the disclosures made in the financial statements 
regarding the provisions. We considered the assumptions used in the 
calculation of the provisions and the disclosures made to be appropriate.

For significant sites that have not yet been developed, we considered 
the latest stage of planning applications and assessed the accuracy of 
management’s historical estimates by comparing previous estimated 
impairments to actual outturns achieved. We did not identify any 
material differences between management’s estimations and actual 
results achieved.

We obtained and read the actuarial report that was prepared by an 
independent firm of actuaries and used by the directors in estimating 
the value of the Group’s liability in respect of the scheme. We tested 
the completeness and accuracy of the pension scheme membership 
data provided to management’s actuary on which the pension liability 
is calculated, comparing the data to the underlying payroll systems.  
We noted no material exceptions from our testing. 

We challenged the key assumptions used in the actuarial valuation, 
being the discount rate, future RPI inflation, mortality rates and 
expected returns on investments by comparing them to internally-
generated typical ranges used for such assumptions, taking into 
account the industry in which the Group operates and other specific 
characteristics of this pension scheme. The actuarial assumptions 
were within the typical ranges for similar pension schemes.

The pension scheme assets are invested in a mixture of pooled funds, 
individual equities, government and corporate bonds and cash. We 
obtained independent confirmations of the existence and valuation of 
all of the scheme assets from the external investment managers and 
tested the valuations of a sample of these assets by agreeing them to 
valuations obtained from independent third party sources. No material 
differences were identified from our testing performed.

How we tailored the audit scope
We tailored the scope of our audit to ensure that we performed enough work to be able to give an opinion on the financial statements as a whole, 
taking into account the geographic structure of the group, the accounting processes and controls, and the industry in which the group operates. 

The Group comprises one principal trading company and a number of smaller subsidiaries and joint ventures, all of which are based in the UK.

We performed audits of the Company and all of the Group’s subsidiaries and joint ventures. This gave us the evidence we needed for our opinion on 
the Group financial statements. All work was performed by the Group engagement team.

Materiality
The scope of our audit was influenced by our application of materiality. We set certain quantitative thresholds for materiality. These, together with 
qualitative considerations, helped us to determine the scope of our audit and the nature, timing and extent of our audit procedures and to evaluate 
the effect of misstatements, both individually and on the financial statements as a whole. 

Based on our professional judgement, we determined materiality for the financial statements as a whole as follows:

Overall group materiality

£10 million (2014: £6.6 million).

How we determined it

5% of profit before tax.

Rationale for benchmark applied

Consistent with last year, we have applied this benchmark, a generally accepted auditing practice, in the 
absence of indicators that an alternative benchmark would be more appropriate.

We agreed with the Audit Committee that we would report to them misstatements identified during our audit above £0.5 million  
(2014: £0.3 million) as well as misstatements below that amount that, in our view, warranted reporting for qualitative reasons.

Going concern
Under the Listing Rules we are required to review the directors’ statement, set out on page 88, in relation to going concern. We have nothing to 
report having performed our review.

As noted in the directors’ statement, the directors have concluded that it is appropriate to prepare the financial statements using the going concern 
basis of accounting. The going concern basis presumes that the group and company have adequate resources to remain in operation, and that the 
directors intend them to do so, for at least one year from the date the financial statements were signed. As part of our audit we have concluded  
that the directors’ use of the going concern basis is appropriate.

However, because not all future events or conditions can be predicted, these statements are not a guarantee as to the Group’s and Company’s ability 
to continue as a going concern.

Other required reporting

Consistency of other information
Companies Act 2006 opinions
In our opinion:

•  the information given in the Strategic Report and the Directors’ Report for the financial year for which the financial statements are prepared is 

consistent with the financial statements; and

•  the information given in the Corporate Governance Statement set out on pages 56 to 63 with respect to internal control and risk management 

systems and about share capital structures is consistent with the financial statements.

90

91

Strategic ReportGovernance ReportFinancial StatementsShareholder InformationRedrow plc Annual Report 2015Redrow plc Annual Report 2015I N D E P E N D E N T   AU D I TO R S ’   R E P O RT   C O N T I N U E D
TO THE MEMBERS OF REDROW plc

ISAs (UK & Ireland) reporting
Under ISAs (UK & Ireland) we are required to report to you if, in our opinion:

•  Information in the Annual Report is:

  −  materially inconsistent with the information in the audited financial statements; or

  − 

 apparently materially incorrect based on, or materially inconsistent with, our knowledge  
of the group and company acquired in the course of performing our audit; or

We have no exceptions to report 
arising from this responsibility.

  −  otherwise misleading. 

•   the statement given by the directors on page 88, in accordance with provision C.1.1 of the UK  

Corporate Governance Code (“the Code”), that they consider the Annual Report taken as a whole  
to be fair, balanced and understandable and provides the information necessary for members to  
assess the group’s and company’s performance, business model and strategy is materially inconsistent 
with our knowledge of the group and company acquired in the course of performing our audit.

We have no exceptions to report 
arising from this responsibility.

•   the section of the Annual Report on page 54, as required by provision C.3.8 of the Code, describing  
the work of the Audit Committee does not appropriately address matters communicated by us to  
the Audit Committee.

We have no exceptions to report 
arising from this responsibility.

Adequacy of accounting records and information and explanations received
Under the Companies Act 2006 we are required to report to you if, in our opinion:

•  we have not received all the information and explanations we require for our audit; or

•  adequate accounting records have not been kept by the company, or returns adequate for our audit have not been received from branches not 

visited by us; or

•  the company financial statements and the part of the Directors’ Remuneration Report to be audited are not in agreement with the accounting 

records and returns.

We have no exceptions to report arising from this responsibility.

Directors’ remuneration
Directors’ remuneration report – Companies Act 2006 opinion
In our opinion, the part of the Directors’ Remuneration Report to be audited has been properly prepared in accordance with the Companies Act 2006.

Other Companies Act 2006 reporting
Under the Companies Act 2006 we are required to report to you if, in our opinion, certain disclosures of directors’ remuneration specified by law are 
not made. We have no exceptions to report arising from this responsibility. 

Corporate governance statement
Under the Companies Act 2006 we are required to report to you if, in our opinion, a corporate governance statement has not been prepared by the 
company. We have no exceptions to report arising from this responsibility. 

Under the Listing Rules we are required to review the part of the Corporate Governance Statement relating to the company’s compliance with ten 
provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code. We have nothing to report having performed our review. 

Responsibilities for the financial statements and the audit

Our responsibilities and those of the directors
As explained more fully in the Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities set out on page 88, the directors are responsible for the preparation of the 
financial statements and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view.

Our responsibility is to audit and express an opinion on the financial statements in accordance with applicable law and ISAs (UK & Ireland). Those 
standards require us to comply with the Auditing Practices Board’s Ethical Standards for Auditors.

This report, including the opinions, has been prepared for and only for the company’s members as a body in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of 
the Companies Act 2006 and for no other purpose. We do not, in giving these opinions, accept or assume responsibility for any other purpose or to 
any other person to whom this report is shown or into whose hands it may come save where expressly agreed by our prior consent in writing.

What an audit of financial statements involves
An audit involves obtaining evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements sufficient to give reasonable assurance that the 
financial statements are free from material misstatement, whether caused by fraud or error. This includes an assessment of: 

•  whether the accounting policies are appropriate to the group’s and the company’s circumstances and have been consistently applied and 

adequately disclosed; 

•  the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by the directors; and

•  the overall presentation of the financial statements. 

We primarily focus our work in these areas by assessing the directors’ judgements against available evidence, forming our own judgements, and 
evaluating the disclosures in the financial statements.

We test and examine information, using sampling and other auditing techniques, to the extent we consider necessary to provide a reasonable basis 
for us to draw conclusions. We obtain audit evidence through testing the effectiveness of controls, substantive procedures or a combination of both. 

In addition, we read all the financial and non-financial information in the Annual Report to identify material inconsistencies with the audited 
financial statements and to identify any information that is apparently materially incorrect based on, or materially inconsistent with, the knowledge 
acquired by us in the course of performing the audit. If we become aware of any apparent material misstatements or inconsistencies we consider the 
implications for our report.

Ian Morrison 
(Senior Statutory Auditor) 
for and on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 
Chartered Accountants and Statutory Auditors 
Manchester

7 September 2015

92

93

Strategic ReportGovernance ReportFinancial StatementsShareholder InformationRedrow plc Annual Report 2015Redrow plc Annual Report 2015CO N S O L I DAT E D   I N CO M E   S TAT E M E N T
FOR THE 12 MONTHS ENDED 30 JUNE

B A L A N C E   S H E E T S
AS AT 30 JUNE

Revenue

Cost of sales

Gross profit

Administrative expenses

Operating profit before financing costs

Financial income

Financial costs

Net financing costs

Share of profit of joint ventures after interest and taxation

Profit before tax

Income tax expense

Profit for the year

Earnings per share – basic

 – diluted

Note

2

3

3

10

4

6

6

2015
£m

1,150

(876)

274

(61)

213

3

(12)

(9)

–

204

(42)

162

2014
£m

864

(676)

188

(50)

138

3

(11)

(8)

3

133

(30)

103

44.5p

44.4p

28.3p

28.2p

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE  INCOME
FOR THE 12 MONTHS ENDED 30 JUNE

Group

Company

Note

Profit for the year

Other comprehensive income/(expense)

Items that will not be reclassified to profit or loss

Remeasurements of post employment benefit obligations

7e

Deferred tax on actuarial (gains)/losses taken directly to equity

Other comprehensive income/(expense) for the year net of tax

2015 
£m

162

8

(2)

6

Total comprehensive income for the year

18

168

2014
 £m

103

(7)

1

(6)

97

2015 
£m

158

8

(2)

6

164

2014
 £m

9

(7)

1

(6)

3

94

Group

2015
£m

Note

Company

2014 
£m

2015
 £m

2014
 £m

Assets

Intangible assets

Property, plant and equipment

Investments

Deferred tax assets

Trade and other receivables

Total non‑current assets

Non-current assets held for sale

Inventories

Trade and other receivables

Current income tax receivables

Cash and cash equivalents

Total current assets

Total assets

Equity

Share capital

Share premium account

Other reserves

Retained earnings

Total equity

Liabilities

Bank loans

Trade and other payables

Deferred tax liabilities

Retirement benefit obligations

Long term provisions

Total non‑current liabilities

Bank overdrafts and loans

Trade and other payables

Current income tax liabilities

Total current liabilities

Total liabilities

Total equity and liabilities

8

9

10

11

12

9

13

12

4

14

17

18

18

18

14

15

11

7

16

14

15

2

12

17

5

13

49

–

2

11

11

8

15

47

1

1,500

1,157

39

–

56

1,595

1,644

37

59

8

745

849

150

84

1

3

7

245

60

471

19

550

795

42

–

55

1,255

1,302

37

59

8

592

696

175

54

1

11

6

247

52

307

–

359

606

1,644

1,302

–

–

–

4

–

4

–

–

741

1

56

798

802

37

59

7

524

627

150

–

–

3

–

153

–

22

–

22

175

802

The financial statements on pages 94 to 124 were approved by the Board of Directors on 7 September 2015 and were signed on its behalf by:

Steve Morgan 
Director 

Barbara Richmond
Director

Redrow plc Registered Number 2877315

–

–

–

6

–

6

–

–

622

3

53

678

684

37

59

7

375

478

175

–

–

11

–

186

–

20

–

20

206

684

95

Strategic ReportGovernance ReportFinancial StatementsShareholder InformationRedrow plc Annual Report 2015Redrow plc Annual Report 2015 
 
 
S TAT E M E N T   O F   C H A N G E S   I N   E Q U I T Y
FOR THE 12 MONTHS ENDED 30 JUNE

S TAT E M E N T   O F   C A S H   FLOW S
FOR THE 12 MONTHS ENDED 30 JUNE

Profit for the year

Other comprehensive income/(expense) for the year

Total comprehensive income relating to the year (net)

Dividend paid

Share-based payment

Movement in LTSIP/SAYE

Net increase in equity

Opening equity

Closing equity

Note

18

18

18

Group

Company

2015
 £m

162

6

168

(15)

–

–

153

696

849

2014
 £m

103

(6)

97

(7)

–

(3)

87

609

696

2015 
£m

158

6

164

(15)

–

–

149

478

627

2014 
£m

9

(6)

3

(7)

–

–

(4)

482

478

As permitted by Section 408 of the Companies Act 2006, the Income Statement of Redrow plc is not presented as a part of these financial statements.

The consolidated profit on ordinary activities after taxation for the financial year, excluding intra-Group dividends, is made up as follows:

Holding company

Subsidiary companies

2015 
£m

8

154

162

2014 
£m

9

94

103

96

Group

2015
 £m

Note

Cash flows from operating activities

Operating profit/(loss) before financing costs

Depreciation and amortisation

Adjustment for non-cash items

Operating profit/(loss) before changes in working capital and provisions

(Increase)/decrease in trade and other receivables

Increase in inventories

Increase in trade and other payables

Increase/(decrease) in provisions

Cash inflow/(outflow) generated from operations

Interest paid

Tax paid

Net cash inflow/(outflow) from operating activities

Cash flows from investing activities

Sale of business

Acquisition of software, property, plant and equipment

Interest received

Net (payments to)/receipts from joint ventures – continuing operations

Net cash inflow from investing activities

Cash flows from financing activities

Issue of bank borrowings

Repayment of bank borrowings

Purchase of own shares

Dividend paid

Net cash (outflow)/inflow from financing activities

(Decrease)/increase in net cash and cash equivalents

Net cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year

Net cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year

19

213

1

(5)

209

(2)

(343)

196

1

61

(6)

(22)

33

9

(1)

–

(6)

2

150

(175)

(2)

(15)

(42)

(7)

3

(4)

2014 
£m

138

1

(4)

135

(12)

(262)

67

(1)

(73)

(9)

–

(82)

10

(1)

–

5

14

175

(95)

(6)

(7)

67

(1)

4

3

Company

2015
 £m

2014
 £m

(2)

–

–

(2)

30

–

2

–

30

(6)

–

24

–

–

19

–

19

150

(175)

–

(15)

(40)

3

53

56

(1)

–

–

(1)

(68)

–

1

–

(68)

(7)

–

(75)

–

–

18

–

18

175

(95)

–

(7)

73

16

37

53

97

Strategic ReportGovernance ReportFinancial StatementsShareholder InformationRedrow plc Annual Report 2015Redrow plc Annual Report 2015ACCO U N T I N G   P O L I C I E S

Both the consolidated and Company financial statements have 
been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting 
Standards (IFRS) as adopted by the European Union (EU) and effective at 
30 June 2015, and in accordance with IFRS Interpretations Committee 
interpretations and the Companies Act 2006 as it applies to companies 
reporting under IFRS and Article 4 of the IAS Regulation and in 
accordance with the historical cost convention as modified by the 
revaluation of derivative financial instruments.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires 
the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts 
of assets and liabilities at the balance sheet date and the reported 
amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Whilst 
these estimates are based on management’s best knowledge of the 
amount, event or actions, actual results ultimately may differ from 
those estimates (refer to note 1).

The financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis.

Redrow plc is a public listed company, listed on the London Stock 
Exchange and domiciled in the UK.

The principal accounting policies have been applied consistently in the 
periods presented and are outlined below:

Basis of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements incorporate the financial 
statements of Redrow plc and all its subsidiaries, together with the 
Group’s share of the results and share of net assets of jointly controlled 
entities i.e. the financial statements of Redrow plc and entities controlled 
by Redrow plc (and its subsidiaries). Control is achieved where Redrow plc 
has the power to govern the financial and operating policies of an entity. 
Redrow plc’s accounting reference date is 30 June. Consistent with the 
normal monthly reporting process, the actual date to which the balance 
sheet has been drawn up is to 28 June 2015 (2014: 29 June 2014). For ease 
of reference all references to the year or 12 months and financial position 
are for the year ended 30 June and as at 30 June.

The Group has taken advantage of the exemption provided under 
Section 408 of the Companies Act 2006 not to present Redrow plc’s 
Company income statement. The profit for the financial year is dealt 
with in the statement of changes in equity.

a. Subsidiaries
Subsidiaries are all entities over which the Group has control. The Group 
controls an entity when the Group is exposed to, or has rights to, variable 
returns from its involvement with the entity and has the ability to affect 
those returns through its power over the entity. Subsidiaries are fully 
consolidated from the date on which control is transferred to the Group. 
They are deconsolidated from the date that control ceases. Identifiable 
assets acquired and liabilities and contingent liabilities assumed in a 
business combination are measured at their fair value at the date of 
acquisition. Any excess of the cost of acquisition over the fair value of the 
Group’s share of the identifiable net assets represents goodwill. Goodwill 
is subject to an annual impairment review, with any reduction in value 
being taken straight to the income statement.

Adjustments are made as necessary to the financial statements of 
subsidiaries to ensure consistency with the policies adopted by the Group.

All inter-company transactions and balances between Group companies 
are eliminated on consolidation.

b. Interests in joint ventures
The Group applies IFRS 11 to all joint arrangements. Under IFRS 11 
investments in joint arrangements are classified as either joint 

98

operations or joint ventures depending on the contractual rights and 
obligations of each investor. Redrow plc has assessed the nature of its 
joint arrangements and determined them to be joint ventures. Joint 
ventures are accounted for using the equity method.

Under the equity method of accounting, interests in joint ventures are 
initially recognised at cost and adjusted thereafter to recognise the 
Group’s share of the  post-acquisition profits or losses and movements 
in other comprehensive income. When the Group’s share of losses in a 
joint venture equals or exceeds its interests in the joint ventures, the 
Group does not recognise further losses, unless it has incurred 
obligations or made payments on behalf of the joint ventures.

Unrealised gains on transactions between the Group and its joint 
ventures are eliminated to the extent of the Group’s interest in the joint 
ventures. Unrealised losses are also eliminated unless the transaction 
provides evidence of an impairment of the asset transferred.

Revenue and Profit Recognition
Revenue represents the fair value received and receivable in respect of 
the sale of residential housing and land and of commercial land and 
developments net of value added tax and discounts. This is recognised 
on legal completion.

Profit is recognised on legal completion.

Segmental Reporting
The main operation of the Group is focused on housebuilding.

As it operates entirely within the United Kingdom, the Group has  
only one business and geographic segment. This is consistent with  
the information provided for internal reporting purposes to the Chief 
Operating Decision Maker (the Board). The Group has no key customers.

Exceptional Items
Exceptional items are those which in the opinion of the Board, are 
material by size or nature, non-recurring and of such significance that  
they require separate disclosure.

Net Financing Costs
Interest income is recognised on a time apportioned basis by reference 
to the principal outstanding and the effective interest rate. Interest 
costs are recognised in the income statement on an accruals basis in 
the period in which they are incurred.

Income and Deferred Tax
Income tax comprises current tax and deferred tax.

Current tax is based on taxable profits for the year and any appropriate 
adjustment to tax payable in respect of prior years. Taxable profit differs 
from profit before tax as shown in the income statement as it excludes 
income or expenditure items which are never chargeable or allowable for 
tax or which are chargeable or deductible in other accounting periods.

Deferred tax is provided in full, using the balance sheet liability method, 
on temporary differences arising between the carrying amounts of assets 
and liabilities in the consolidated financial statements and the 
corresponding tax bases used in the calculation of taxable profit.

Deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is probable that 
taxable profits will be available against which deductible temporary 
differences can be utilised. Deferred tax liabilities are recognised for all 
temporary differences. Deferred tax is calculated at the rates enacted at 
the balance sheet date.

Deferred tax is credited or charged in the income statement, consolidated 
statement of comprehensive income, or retained earnings as appropriate.

Intangible Assets – Computer Software
Acquired computer software licences are capitalised on the  
basis of costs incurred to bring to use the specific software and are 
amortised over their estimated useful lives of three years, charged 
to administrative expenses. These are reviewed for impairment whenever 
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying values may 
not be recoverable.

Property, Plant and Equipment
Freehold property comprises offices or other buildings held for 
administrative purposes. Freehold property is shown at cost less 
the subsequent depreciation of buildings. 

All other property, plant and equipment is stated at historic cost less 
depreciation. Historic cost includes any costs directly attributable to 
bringing the assets to the location and condition necessary for them to  
be capable of operating in the manner intended by management.

Land is not depreciated. Depreciation on other assets is charged so as to 
write off the cost of assets to their residual values over their estimated 
useful lives, on a straight line basis as follows:

Buildings within freehold property
Plant and machinery
Fixtures and fittings

50 years
5–10 years
3–5 years

The assets’ useful lives are reviewed and adjusted if appropriate at each 
balance sheet date.

These are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in 
circumstances indicate that the carrying values may not be recoverable.

The gain or loss arising on the disposal of an asset represents the 
difference between the sales proceeds and the carrying amount of  
the asset and is recognised in the income statement.

Non‑current Assets Held for Sale
Non-current assets are classified as assets held for sale when 
their carrying amount is to be recovered principally through a sale 
transaction and a sale is considered highly probable. They are stated at 
management’s best estimate of realisable value less estimated costs 
necessary to make the sale.

Investment in Subsidiary Companies
In the parent company books, the investment in its subsidiaries is held at 
cost less any impairment.

Leases
Leases in which substantially all of the risks and rewards of ownership are 
retained by the lessor are classified as operating leases. Rentals payable 
under operating leases are charged to work in progress or income on a 
straight line basis over the term of the relevant lease.

Net realisable value for land was assessed by estimating selling prices 
and cost (including sales and marketing expenses), taking into account 
current market conditions.

This net realisable value provision will be closely monitored for 
adequacy and appropriateness as regards under and over provision 
to reflect circumstances at future balance sheet dates. Any material 
change to the underlying provision will be reflected through cost of 
sales as an exceptional item.

Forward Land
Expenditure relating to forward land excluding owned sites without 
residential planning consent but including options, fees etc. is provided 
for when incurred. After exercise of an option and acquisition of land 
following the securing of planning permission, the provisions relating to 
that land are released. Expenditure incurred on owned sites without 
residential planning consent is included in inventories and is subject to  
a regular impairment review.

Employee Benefits
a. Pension obligation
IAS 19R – Employee Benefits, has been adopted with effect from 
1 July 2013. The change in the accounting standard has been adopted 
retrospectively and the comparative accounts have been restated. 
Under IAS 19R the separate calculations of an interest cost on the 
defined benefit obligation and an expected rate of return on plan assets 
have been replaced with a net interest charge calculated by applying the 
discount rate to the net defined benefit liability. The impact of the 
restatement on prior periods is shown in the table in note 7e.

The Group operates two pension schemes for its staff. The Redrow Staff 
Pension Scheme (the ‘Scheme’) closed to the accrual of new benefits 
with effect from 1 March 2012, with new benefits now being provided 
via the Redrow Group Personal Pension Plan (the ‘GPP’). The Scheme is 
externally invested and comprises two sections: a defined benefit 
section and a defined contribution section. A defined benefit plan is a 
pension plan which defines an amount of pension benefit that an 
employee will receive on retirement. It is funded through payments to 
trustee administered funds, determined by actuarial valuations carried 
out on at least a triennial basis. A defined contribution plan is a pension 
plan under which the Group pays agreed contributions into a separate 
fund for each employee and any subsequent pension payable to a 
specific employee is determined by the amount accumulated in their 
individual fund. The GPP is also a type of defined contribution plan.

The asset/(liability) recognised in the balance sheet in respect  
of the defined benefit section of the scheme is the present value of the 
defined benefit obligation at the balance sheet date, less the fair value 
of plan assets. The defined benefit obligation is determined using the 
projected unit credit method on an annual basis by an independent 
scheme actuary.

Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost and net realisable value less cash 
on account (which represents payments made against work in progress).

Actuarial gains and losses arising from experience adjustments and 
changes in actuarial assumptions are charged or credited to equity 
as they arise in full via the statement of comprehensive income.

Cost comprises land and associated acquisition costs, direct materials and 
subcontract work, other direct costs and those overheads (based on normal 
operating capacity) that have been incurred in bringing the inventories to 
their present location and condition, excluding borrowing costs.

Provisions are established to write down land where the estimated net  
sales proceeds less costs to complete exceed the current carrying value. 
Adjustments to the provisions will be required where selling prices or 
costs to complete change.

Scheme service costs are charged to cost of sales and administrative 
expenses as appropriate and scheme finance costs are included in net 
financing costs. Past service costs are recognised immediately in income.

In respect of the defined contribution section of the Scheme and the 
GPP, contributions are recognised as an employee benefit expense when 
they are due. The Group has no further payment obligations in respect of 
the above once the contributions have been paid.

99

Strategic ReportGovernance ReportFinancial StatementsShareholder InformationRedrow plc Annual Report 2015Redrow plc Annual Report 2015ACCO U N T I N G   P O L I C I E S   C O N T I N U E D

b. Bonus plans
The Group recognises a liability and an expense for bonuses where 
contractually obliged.

c. Share-based payments
The Group has applied the requirements of IFRS 2 ‘Share-based 
payments’. In accordance with the transitional provisions, IFRS 2 has been 
applied to all grants of equity instruments after 7 November 2002, which 
had not vested as of 1 July 2004. Equity settled share-based payments  
are measured at fair value on the date of grant and expensed on a straight 
line basis over the vesting period, based on the Group’s estimate of shares 
that will eventually vest.

d. Termination benefits
Termination benefits are payable when employment is terminated 
by the Group before normal retirement date by redundancy. 
These benefits are recognised by the Group in the period in which it 
becomes demonstrably committed to terminating the employment  
of current employees according to a detailed formal plan without 
possibility of withdrawal.

Financial Instruments
a. Land creditors
Deferred payments arising from land creditors are held at discounted 
present value using the effective interest method, in accordance with IAS 
39. The difference between the fair value and the nominal value is 
amortised over the deferment period via financing costs.

The interest rate applied is an equivalent loan rate available on the date  
of the land purchase.

b. Derivative financial instruments and hedge accounting
Derivative financial instruments are initially recorded at fair value and  
the fair value is remeasured to fair value at each reporting date.

The Group’s use of financial derivatives is governed by an interest rate risk 
management framework adopted by the Board which sets parameters to 
ensure an appropriate level of hedging is maintained to manage interest 
rate risk in respect of borrowings.

The policy prohibits any trading in derivative financial instruments or 
their use for speculative purposes.

The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivative financial 
instruments which are designated and which qualify as cash flow hedges 
are recognised directly in equity in a hedge reserve. The gains or losses 
relating to the ineffective portion are recognised in the income statement 
immediately they arise.

c. Loans and receivables
Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or 
determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. They are 
included in current assets, except for maturities greater than 12 months 
after the balance sheet date which are classified as non-current assets. 
Loans and receivables include ‘trade receivables’ and ‘other receivables’ 
and cash and cash equivalents in the balance sheet.

Trade receivables are held at discounted present value less any 
impairment. The amount is then increased to settlement value  
over the settlement period via financing income.

d. Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash balances and call deposits. Bank 
overdrafts that are repayable on demand, forming an integral part of the 
Group’s cash management are included as a component of cash and cash 
equivalents for the purpose of the statement of cash flows.

e. Borrowings and trade payables
Interest bearing borrowings and trade payables are recorded when 
the proceeds are received, net of transaction costs incurred and 
subsequently at amortised cost. Any difference between the proceeds, 
net of transaction costs and the redemption value is recognised in the 
income statement over the period of the borrowings.

Onerous Contracts
Onerous contracts are contracts in which the unavoidable costs in 
meeting the obligations under the contract exceed the economic 
benefits expected to be received under it. Provision is made to reflect 
management’s best current estimate of the least net cost of either 
fulfilling or exiting the contract.

Share Capital
Ordinary shares are classed as equity.

Dividend Distribution
Dividend distribution to the Company’s shareholders is recognised as  
a liability in the Group’s financial statements in the period in which  
the dividends are declared.

Impact of New Standards and Interpretations
a. New standards
IFRS 10, ‘Consolidated financial statements’. This standard builds on existing 
principles by identifying the concept of control as the determining factor 
in whether an entity should be included within the consolidated financial 
statements. The standard provides additional guidance to assist in 
determining control where this is difficult to assess. This new standard 
might impact the entities that a group consolidates as its subsidiaries. 
Effective annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013 although 
endorsed for annual periods on or after 1 January 2014.

IFRS 11, ‘Joint arrangements’. This standard provides for a more realistic 
reflection of joint arrangements by focusing on the rights and 
obligations of the arrangement, rather than its legal form. There are two 
types of joint arrangement: joint operations and joint ventures. Joint 
operations arise where a joint operator has rights to the assets and 
obligations relating to the arrangement and hence accounts for its 
interest in assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses. Joint ventures arise 
where the joint operator has rights to the net assets of the arrangement 
and hence equity accounts for its interest. Proportional consolidation of 
joint ventures is no longer allowed. Effective annual periods beginning 
on or after 1 January 2013 although endorsed for annual periods on or 
after 1 January 2014.

IFRS 12, ‘Disclosures of interests in other entities’ This standard includes 
the disclosure requirements for all forms of interests in other entities, 
including joint arrangements, associates, special purpose vehicles and 
other off-balance-sheet vehicles. Effective annual periods beginning on 
or after 1 January 2013 although endorsed for annual periods on or after  
1 January 2014.

Amendments to IFRS 10, 11 and 12. These amendments also provide 
additional transition relief in IFRSs 10, 11 and 12, limiting the 
requirement to provide adjusted comparative information to only the 
preceding comparative period. For disclosures related to unconsolidated 

structured entities, the amendments will remove the requirement to 
present comparative information for periods before IFRS 12 is first 
applied. Effective for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013 and 
endorsed by the EU for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2014.

IAS 27 (revised 2011) ‘Separate financial statements’. This standard 
includes the provisions on separate financial statements that are left 
after the control provisions of IAS 27 have been included in the new IFRS 
10. Effective for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013 and 
endorsed by the EU for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2014.

IAS 28 (revised 2011) ‘Associates and joint ventures’. This standard 
includes the requirements for joint ventures, as well as associates, to be 
equity accounted following the issue of IFRS 11. Effective for periods 
beginning on or after 1 January 2013 and endorsed by the EU for periods 
beginning on or after 1 January 2014. 

Amendments to IAS 32 on Financial instruments asset and liability 
offsetting. This amendment updates the application guidance in IAS 32, 
‘Financial instruments: Presentation’, to clarify some of the 
requirements for offsetting financial assets and financial liabilities on 
the balance sheet. Effective annual periods on or after 1 January 2014.

Amendment to IAS 36, ‘Impairment of assets’ on recoverable amount 
disclosures. These amendments address the disclosure of information 
about the recoverable amount of impaired assets if that amount is 
based on fair value less costs of disposal. Effective annual periods on or 
after 1 January 2014.

Amendment to IAS 39 ‘Financial instruments: Recognition and 
measurement’, on novation of derivatives and hedge accounting 
(effective annual periods on or after 1 January 2014) These narrow-
scope amendments allow hedge accounting to continue in a situation 
where a derivative, which has been designated as a hedging instrument, 
is novated to effect clearing with a central counterparty as a result of 
laws or regulation, if specific conditions are met (in this context, a 
novation indicates that parties to a contract agree to replace their 
original counterparty with a new one). This relief has been introduced in 
response to legislative changes across many jurisdictions that would 
lead to the widespread novation of over-the-counter derivatives. These 
legislative changes were prompted by a G20 commitment to improve 
transparency and regulatory oversight of over-the-counter derivatives in 
an internationally consistent and non-discriminatory way. Similar relief 
will be included in IFRS 9, ‘Financial instruments’. Effective annual 
periods on or after 1 January 2014.

Amendment to IAS 32, ‘Financial instruments: Presentation’, on 
offsetting financial assets and financial liabilities. This amendment 
updates the application guidance in IAS 32, ‘Financial instruments: 
Presentation’, to clarify some of the requirements for offsetting financial 
assets and financial liabilities on the balance sheet. Effective for periods 
beginning on or after 1 January 2014 and endorsed by the EU on 
December 2012.

IFRIC 21, ‘Levies’. This interpretation is on IAS 37, ‘Provisions, contingent 
liabilities and contingent assets’. IAS 37 sets out criteria for the 
recognition of a liability, one of which is the requirement for the entity 
to have a present obligation as a result of a past event (known as an 
obligating event). The interpretation clarifies that the obligating event 
that gives rise to a liability to pay a levy is the activity described in the 
relevant legislation that triggers the payment of the levy. Effective 
annual periods on or after 1 January 2014.

b. New standards, amendments and interpretations issued but not effective 
for the financial year beginning 1 July 2013 and not early adopted
IFRS 9 ‘Financial instruments – classification and measurement’. This 
standard on classification and measurement of financial assets and 
financial liabilities will replace IAS 39. IFRS 9 has two measurement 
categories: amortised cost and fair value. All equity instruments are 
measured at fair value. A debt instrument is measured at amortised cost 
only if the entity is holding it to collect contractual cash flows and the 
cash flows represent principal and interest. For liabilities, the standard 
retains most of the IAS 39 requirements. These include amortised-cost 
accounting for most financial liabilities, with bifurcation of embedded 
derivatives. Effective for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2018.

Amendments to IFRS 9, ‘Financial instruments’, regarding general hedge 
accounting. These amendments to IFRS 9, ‘Financial instruments’, bring 
into effect a substantial overhaul of hedge accounting that will allow 
entities to better reflect their risk management activities in the financial 
statements. Effective for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2018 
but no date set yet for endorsement by the EU.

Amendment to IFRS 11, ‘Joint arrangements’ on acquisition of an 
interest in a joint operation. This amendment adds new guidance on 
how to account for the acquisition of an interest in a joint operation 
that constitutes a business. The amendments specify the appropriate 
accounting treatment for such acquisitions. Effective for periods 
beginning on or after 1 January 2016 but no date set yet for 
endorsement by the EU.

Amendment to IAS 16, ‘Property, plant and equipment’ and IAS 
38,’Intangible assets’, on depreciation and amortisation. In this 
amendment the IASB has clarified that the use of revenue based 
methods to calculate the depreciation of an asset is not appropriate 
because revenue generated by an activity that includes the use of an 
asset generally reflects factors other than the consumption of the 
economic benefits embodied in the asset. The IASB has also clarified 
that revenue is generally presumed to be an inappropriate basis for 
measuring the consumption of the economic benefits embodied in an 
intangible asset. Effective for periods beginning on or after 1 January 
2016 but no date set yet for endorsement by the EU.

Amendment to IAS 19,’Employee benefits’, regarding defined benefit 
plans. These narrow scope amendments apply to contributions from 
employees or third parties to defined benefit plans. The objective of the 
amendments is to simplify the accounting for contributions that are 
independent of the number of years of employee service, for example, 
employee contributions that are calculated according to a fixed 
percentage of salary. Effective annual periods on or after 1 July 2014 
although endorsed for annual periods on or after 1 February 2015.

IFRS 15 ‘Revenue from contracts with customers’. IFRS 15, ‘Revenue 
from contracts with customers’ is a converged standard from the IASB 
and FASB on revenue recognition. The standard will improve the 
financial reporting of revenue and improve comparability of the top line 
in financial statements globally. Effective for periods beginning on or 
after 1 January 2018 but no date set yet for endorsement by the EU.

Amendments to IAS 27, ‘Separate financial statements’ on the equity 
method. These amendments allow entities to use the equity method to 
account for investments in subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates in 
their separate financial statements. Effective for periods beginning on or 
after 1 January 2016 but no date set yet for endorsement by the EU.

100

101

Strategic ReportGovernance ReportFinancial StatementsShareholder InformationRedrow plc Annual Report 2015Redrow plc Annual Report 2015N OT E S   TO   T H E   FI N A N C I A L   S TAT E M E N T S

1. Critical accounting estimates and judgements
Estimates and judgements are continually evaluated and are based on historical experience and other factors, including expectations of future events 
that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Management considers the key sources of estimation uncertainty and critical accounting 
judgements relate to:

Carrying value of inventories
The Group carries inventories at the lower of cost and net realisable value less cash on account.

Due to the nature of development timescales, it is routinely necessary to estimate costs to complete and future revenues and to allocate non-unit 
specific development costs between units legally completing in the current financial year and in future periods.

A full review of the net realisable value of inventories was undertaken by the Group as at 30 June 2015.

Pensions
The Group has utilised assumptions including a rate of return on assets, mortality assumptions and a discount rate having been advised by its 
actuary. To the extent that such assumed rates are different from what actually transpires, the retirement benefit obligations of the Group  
would change.

2. Operating profit before financing costs

Operating profit before financing costs is stated after charging:

Inventories expensed in the year

Depreciation

Operating leases – plant and machinery

– other

Research and development expenditure

Auditors’ remuneration – fees payable to Company’s Auditors for audit services (i)

– fees payable to Company’s Auditors for other services (ii)

Fees payable to Company’s Auditors for audit services comprise:

Note

13

9

2015 
£m

2014
 £m

826

633

1

2

1

1

–

–

1

1

–

–

–

–

(i) 

 fees payable for the audit of parent company and consolidated financial statements £30,000 (2014: £30,000) and fees payable for the  
audit of the Company’s subsidiaries pursuant to legislation £117,280 (2014: £111,500).

(ii)    Auditors’ remuneration for other services comprised £20,000 (2014: £20,000) in respect of an independent review of the half-yearly financial 
statements (Audit related assurance services), and £8,200 (2014: £7,333) in respect of iXBRL tagging (Taxation compliance services).

3. Net financing costs

Interest payable on bank loans

Net interest expenses – pension scheme (note 7e)

Imputed interest on deferred land creditors

Financial costs

Other interest receivable

Financial income

Net financing costs

4. Income tax expense

Current tax charge

UK Corporation Tax at 20.75% (2014: 22.50%)

Deferred tax

Origination and reversal of temporary differences

Impact of changes in deferred tax rate

Total income tax charge in income statement

Reconciliation of tax charge for the year

Profit before tax

Tax calculated at UK Corporation Tax rate of 20.75% (2014: 22.50%)

Impact of change in deferred tax rate

Short term temporary differences

Tax charge for the year

Deferred tax recognised directly in equity

Relating to pension scheme

Current income tax receivable in the Company is £1m (2014: £3m).

5. Dividends
The following dividends were paid by the Group:

Prior year final dividend per share of 2.0p (2014: 1.0p); Current year interim dividend per share of 2.0p (2014: 1.0p)

2015
£m

(7)

–

(5)

(12)

3

3

(9)

2014 
£m

(7)

–

(4)

(11)

3

3

(8)

2015
£m

2014 
£m

41

1

–

42

204

42

–

–

42

(2)

(2)

2015
£m

15

15

–

29

1

30

133

30

1

(1)

30

1

1

2014 
£m

7

7

The Board decided to propose a final dividend of 4.0p per share in respect of 2015 (£15m (2014: £7m)). The dividend has not been provided for and 
there are no income tax consequences.

102

103

Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Strategic ReportGovernance ReportFinancial StatementsShareholder Information 
6. Earnings per ordinary share
The basic earnings per share calculation for the year ended 30 June 2015 is based on the weighted average number of shares in issue during the 
period of 364m (2014: 363m) excluding those held in trust under the Redrow Long Term Incentive Plan (6m shares (2014: 7m shares)), which are 
treated as cancelled.

Diluted earnings per share has been calculated after adjusting the weighted average number of shares in issue for all potentially dilutive shares held 
under unexercised options.

For the 12 months ended 30 June 2015

Basic earnings per share

Effect of share options and SAYE

Diluted earnings per share

Basic earnings per share

Adjustment to deferred tax rate change

Adjusted earnings per share

Adjusted diluted earnings per share are 44.4p (2014: 28.5p).

For the 12 months ended 30 June 2014

Basic earnings per share

Effect of share options and SAYE

Diluted earnings per share

Basic earnings per share

Adjustment to deferred tax rate change

Adjusted earnings per share

7. Employees
a. Cost (including Directors)

Wages and salaries

Social security costs

Other pension costs

Share-based payments

Earnings 
£m

Number  
of shares  
millions

162

–

162

364

1

365

Per share  
pence

44.5

(0.1)

44.4

Earnings 
£m

Number  
of shares  
millions

Per share  
pence

162

–

162

364

–

364

44.5

–

44.5

Earnings 
£m

Number  
of shares 
millions

Per share  
pence

103

–

103

363

2

365

28.3

(0.1)

28.2

Earnings 
£m

Number  
of shares 
millions

Per share  
pence

103

1

104

363

–

363

2015 
£m

64

8

7

2

81

28.3

0.3

28.6

2014 
£m

49

6

5

2

62

7. Employees continued
b. Number
The monthly average number of persons employed by the Group was:

Directors and administrative staff

Other personnel

2015 
Number

2014 
Number

629

901

1,530

482

763

1,245

c. Key management remuneration
Key management personnel, as defined under IAS 24 ‘Related party disclosures’, are identified as the Main Board together with Group  
Senior Management.

Summary key management remuneration is as follows:

Salaries and short term employee benefits

Share-based payments

2015 
£m

2014 
£m

2

2

4

2

1

3

In addition, the Redrow Staff Pension scheme paid £14,411 (2014: £14,060) to Steve Morgan in his capacity as an active Scheme pensioner.

Detailed disclosure of Directors’ emoluments and interests in shares are included in the Directors’ Remuneration report on pages 70 to 83, which 
form part of these financial statements.

d. Share-based payments
Save As You Earn Share Option scheme (SAYE)
The Redrow plc SAYE scheme is open to all employees and share options can be exercised either three or five years after the date of grant, depending 
on the length of the savings contract. The SAYE schemes are not subject to performance conditions.

The SAYE schemes have been valued using the Black-Scholes pricing model.

Options granted during the year

Date of grant

Fair value at measurement date

Share price

Exercise price

Option life (contract length)

Expected dividend yield

Risk free interest rate

2015 

1,172,005

2014 

969,704

1 January 2015

1 January 2014

£1.01

£2.76

£2.21

£0.98

£2.48

£1.98

3/5 years

3/5 years

2.7%

1.5%

1.3%

1.5%

The expected volatility on SAYE schemes is based on the historic volatility of the Group’s share price over periods equal to the length of the 
savings contract.

Long Term Share Incentive scheme (LTSIP)
Except in specified circumstances, options granted under the scheme are exercisable between three and ten years after the date of grant.

Options granted under the LTSIP on 8 September 2014 were granted to a limited number of Senior Executives. The scheme is discussed in greater 
detail within the Directors’ Remuneration report.

The Long Term Share Incentive schemes have been valued using the Black-Scholes pricing model.

104

105

Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Redrow plc Annual Report 2015NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUEDStrategic ReportGovernance ReportFinancial StatementsShareholder Information7. Employees continued
d. Share-based payments continued

Options granted during the year

Date of grant

Fair value at the measurement date

Share price

Exercise price

Expected volatility

Option life

Expected dividend yield

Risk free interest rate

2015

377,194

2014

368,842

8 September 2014

24 September 2013

£2.53

£2.75

£0.00

N/A†

3 years

2.7%

N/A†

£2.21

£2.37

£0.00

N/A†

3 years

2.3%

N/A†

†  For nil-cost awards not subject to a market based condition, volatility and risk free rate are not applicable.

The fair value at the measurement date of the LTSIP granted on 8 September 2014 comprises £2.53 in respect of non-market based  
performance conditions.

The fair value at the measurement date of the LTSIP granted on 24 September 2013 comprises £2.21 in respect of non-market based  
performance conditions.

Deferred Bonus Incentive (DBI)
Grants under the DBI were limited to Senior Management. Except in specified circumstances options granted under the scheme are exercisable 
between one and ten years after the date of grant for Tranche 1 and between two and ten years after the date of grant for Tranche 2 and are not 
subject to performance conditions.

The DBI has been valued using the Black-Scholes pricing model.

Options granted during the year

Date of grant

Fair value at the measurement date

Share price

Exercise price

Expected volatility

Option life

Expected dividend yield

Risk free interest rate

2015
Tranche 1

625,688

2015 
Tranche 2

625,634

2014 
Tranche 1

453,003

2014 
Tranche 2

453,003

8 September 2014

8 September 2014

24 September 2013

24 September 2013

£2.69

£2.75

£0.00

N/A†

1 year

2.20%

N/A†

£2.62

£2.75

£0.00

N/A†

2 years

2.40%

N/A†

£2.32

£2.37

£0.00

N/A†

1 year

2.08%

N/A†

£2.27

£2.37

£0.00

N/A†

2 years

2.08%

N/A†

†  For nil-cost awards not subject to a market based condition, volatility and risk free rate are not applicable.

Company Share Option Plan (CSOP)
Grants under the CSOP were limited to Senior Management. Except in specified circumstances, options granted to those other than the  
Executive Directors are exercisable between three and ten years after the date of grant and are not subject to performance conditions. 

7. Employees continued
d. Share-based payments continued
Share options outstanding
The following share options were outstanding at 30 June 2015:

Type of scheme

Long Term Share Incentive 2010

Long Term Share Incentive 2011

Long Term Share Incentive 2012

Long Term Share Incentive 2013

Long Term Share Incentive 2014

Deferred Bonus Incentive 2012 – Tranche 1

Deferred Bonus Incentive 2012 – Tranche 2

Deferred Bonus Incentive 2013 – Tranche 1

Deferred Bonus Incentive 2013 – Tranche 2

Deferred Bonus Incentive 2014 – Tranche 1

Deferred Bonus Incentive 2014 – Tranche 2

Company Share Option Plan

Save As You Earn

Save As You Earn

Save As You Earn

Save As You Earn

Save As You Earn

Date of grant

Number  
of options 
2015

Number  
of options  
2014

Exercise 
 price

18 February 2011

–

30,470

21 September 2011

159,889

721,070

23 October 2012

544,757

544,757

24 September 2013

368,842

368,842

8 September 2014

377,194

23 October 2012

54,341

23 October 2012

168,035

24 September 2013

159,060

24 September 2013

395,052

8 September 2014

572,585

8 September 2014

572,537

–

120,010

330,163

422,507

422,507

–

–

21 November 2008

161,865

263,780

1 January 2010

1,836

21,108

1 January 2011

180,874

199,164

1 January 2012

234,416

986,209

1 January 2014

863,174

947,162

1 January 2015

1,139,027

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

£1.25

£1.42

£0.98

£0.95

£1.98

£2.21

The total share options outstanding at 30 June 2015 under the Long Term Share Incentive Plan, Company Share Option Plan and the Save As You 
Earn schemes represent 1.6% of the issued share capital (2014: 1.5%).

106

107

Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Redrow plc Annual Report 2015NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUEDStrategic ReportGovernance ReportFinancial StatementsShareholder Information7. Employees continued
d. Share-based payments continued
Movements in the year
The number and weighted average exercise prices of share options is as follows:

Long Term Share Incentive scheme:

Outstanding at the beginning of the year

Lapsed during the year

Exercised during the year

Granted during the year

Outstanding at the end of the year

Exercisable at the end of the year

Deferred Bonus Incentive scheme:

Outstanding at the beginning of the year

Lapsed during the year

Exercised during the year

Granted during the year

Outstanding at the end of the year

Exercisable at the end of the year

Company Share Option Plan:

Outstanding at the beginning of the year

Lapsed during the year

Exercised during the year

Outstanding at the end of the year

Exercisable at the end of the year

Save As You Earn scheme:

Outstanding at the beginning of the year

Lapsed during the year

Exercised during the year

Granted during the year

Outstanding at the end of the year

Exercisable at the end of the year

Number 
 of options 
2015

Weighted  
average 
 exercise price 
 2015

Number 
 of options 
2014

Weighted  
average 
 exercise price 
 2014

1,665,139

–

(591,651)

377,194

1,450,682

159,889

1,295,187

(67,586)

(557,313)

1,251,322

1,921,610

381,436

263,780

–

(101,915)

161,865

161,865

2,153,643

(146,637)

(759,684)

1,172,005

2,419,327

3,402

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

£1.25

£1.25

£1.25

£1.25

£1.25

£0.98

£1.83

£0.96

£2.21

£1.91

£0.95

2,880,423

(1,460,121)

(124,005)

368,842

1,665,139

30,470

701,636

(55,467)

(256,988)

906,006

1,295,187

120,010

499,588

(77,937)

(157,871)

263,780

263,780

1,936,830

(141,418)

(611,473)

969,704

2,153,643

18,290

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

£1.25

£1.25

£1.25

£1.25

£1.25

£0.99

£0.93

£1.01

£1.98

£1.41

£0.98

The weighted average share price at the date of exercise of share options exercised during the year was £3.34 (2014: £2.94).

The options outstanding at 30 June 2015 had a range of exercise prices of £nil to £2.21 (2014: £nil to £1.98) and a weighted average remaining 
contractual life of 6.0 years (2014: 4.6 years).

7. Employees continued
e. Retirement benefit schemes
The Redrow Staff Pension Scheme (the ‘Scheme’) comprises two sections: a funded, self-administered, defined benefit section and a funded defined 
contribution section. The defined benefit section was closed to all new entrants from July 2006, having been closed to all but a limited number of 
agreed new entrants from October 2001. Both sections of the Scheme were closed to future accrual with effect from 1 March 2012.

The total pension credit for the year was £1m (2014: charge of £12m). A credit of £7m related to the defined benefit section of the Scheme (2014: 
charge of £8m), with £1m being charged to the income statement (2014: charge of £1m) and a credit of £8m to the statement of comprehensive 
income (2014: charge of £7m). The charge arising from the defined contribution section was £6m (2014: £4m).

Triennial valuation
A full independent triennial actuarial valuation of the defined benefit section of the Scheme was undertaken at 1 July 2014 using the Projected Unit 
Method. In the opinion of the Actuary, there was a deficit of £20m in the defined benefit section of the Scheme, based on the Trustees’ technical 
provisions assumptions with the Scheme’s assets representing 82% of the Scheme’s technical provisions. As at 1 July 2014 the value of the defined 
benefit section of the Scheme’s assets was £92m. The previous triennial valuation was undertaken as at 1 July 2011 and reported a deficit of £10m.

Defined benefit scheme – IAS 19R valuation
Redrow has a policy of recognising all actuarial gains and losses for its defined benefit plan in the period in which they occur, outside the income 
statement, in the statement of comprehensive income.

This disclosure relates to the defined benefit section of the Scheme. The Scheme’s assets are held separately from the assets of Redrow and are 
administered by the trustees and managed professionally.

The latest formal actuarial valuation of the defined benefit section was carried out at 1 July 2014. This valuation has been updated  
to 30 June 2015 by a qualified actuary for the purposes of these accounts.

Based on the recovery plan agreed for the 1 July 2014 actuarial valuation, the Group expects to contribute £1m to the Scheme in the year ending  
30 June 2016. 

The major financial assumptions used in arriving at the IAS 19R valuation were:

Long term rate of increase in pensionable salaries

Rate of increase of benefits in payment (lesser of 5% per annum and RPI)1

Rate of increase of benefits in payment (lesser of 2.5% per annum and RPI)2

Discount rate

Inflation assumption – RPI

 – CPI

2015

n/a

3.2%

2.2%

3.8%

3.2%

2.2%

2014

n/a

3.4%

2.2%

4.3%

3.6%

2.6%

1  In respect of pensions in excess of the guaranteed minimum pension earned prior to 30 June 2006.

2  In respect of pensions in excess of the guaranteed minimum pension earned after 30 June 2006. Other pension increases are valued in a consistent manner.

The mortality tables used in the actuarial valuation were as follows (which make allowance for projected further improvements  
in mortality): 

For male members: 

SAPS CMI_2014 1.25% Long Term Trend (2014: SIN X A CMI_2010 1% Long Term Trend)

The life expectancies implied by these tables for typical members are:

Pensioner currently aged 65:  

Male 22.4 years (2014: Male 22.3 years)

The expected life used in the models has been adjusted, based on best estimates, to reflect exercise restrictions and behavioural considerations.

Future pensioner when aged 65: 

Male 23.7 years (2014: Male 23.3 years)

The charge to income in relation to equity settled share-based payments in the year is £2m (2014: charge £2m).

It has been assumed that the majority of members will commute part of their pension in return for a tax free cash sum on retirement.

The Scheme closed to future benefit accrual on 29 February 2012. Prior to the closure, active members received pensionable salary increases which 
were capped each year at the Retail Price Index (RPI) or 2.5% if lower. Deferred pensions are assumed to increase in line with the Consumer Price 
Index (CPI). At the date the Scheme closure was effected, the best estimate of future CPI was almost identical to the salary growth assumption, 
hence the closure does not result in any curtailment item.

108

109

Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Redrow plc Annual Report 2015NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUEDStrategic ReportGovernance ReportFinancial StatementsShareholder Information7. Employees continued
e. Retirement benefit schemes continued
The total assets, the split between the major asset classes in the Scheme, the present value of the Schemes’ liabilities and the amounts recognised in 
the balance sheet are shown below:

7. Employees continued
e. Retirement benefit schemes continued
The amount included in the balance sheet arising from the deficit in respect of the Group’s defined benefit section is as follows:

Group and Company

Equities

Property

Debt instruments

Other

Cash

Insurance policies

Total market value of assets

Present value of obligations

(Deficit) in the Scheme

2015
£m
Quoted  
market price in 
active market

2015
£m
No quoted  
market price in 
active market

33

1

48

8

7

–

97

–

–

–

4

–

2

6

2015 
£m
Total

33

1

48

12

7

2

103

(106)

(3)

The defined benefit obligation can be approximately attributed to the scheme members as follows:

Deferred members

Pensioner members

All benefits are vested at 30 June 2015 (unchanged from 30 June 2014).

The total amounts credited/(charged) against income in the year were as follows:

2014
£m
Quoted  
market price in 
active market

2014
£m
No quoted  
market price in 
active market

33

1

40

5

8

–

87

–

–

–

5

–

2

7

2015
%

72

28

100

2014 
£m
Total

33

1

40

10

8

2

94

(105)

(11)

2014
%

74

26

100

Balance sheet (deficit)

At start of year

Amounts credited/(charged) against statement of comprehensive income

Employer contributions paid

At end of year

Changes in the present value of the defined benefit obligation:

At start of year

Interest expense

Benefit payments

Actuarial losses arising from changes in demographic assumptions

Actuarial losses arising from changes in financial assumptions

Actuarial gains arising from experience adjustments

At end of year

Changes in the fair value of the Scheme’s assets:

At start of year

Interest income

Return on scheme assets excluding interest income

Scheme administration expenses

Normal employer contributions

Benefit payments

At end of year

Amounts included within the income statement:

Administrative expenses

Scheme administration expenses

Net interest on defined benefit liability

Amounts recognised in the statement of comprehensive income:

Return on scheme assets excluding interest income

Actuarial losses arising from changes in demographic assumptions

Actuarial losses arising from changes in financial assumptions

Actuarial gains arising from experience adjustments

110

Group and Company

2015 
£m

2014 
£m

(1)

–

(1)

10

(1)

(4)

3

8

7

(1)

–

(1)

2

–

(9)

–

(7)

(8)

Group and Company

2015 
£m

2014 
£m

(11)

7

1

(3)

105

4

(5)

1

4

(3)

106

94

4

10

(1)

1

(5)

103

(4)

(8)

1

(11)

95

4

(3)

–

9

–

105

91

4

2

(1)

1

(3)

94

111

Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Redrow plc Annual Report 2015NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUEDStrategic ReportGovernance ReportFinancial StatementsShareholder Information7. Employees continued
e. Retirement benefit schemes continued
Sensitivity of key assumptions
The table below gives a broad indication of the impact on the IAS 19R numbers to changes in assumptions and experience (away from the 
assumptions shown on page 109). All figures are before allowing for deferred tax.

Item

Increase/reduce discount rate by 0.25%

Increase/reduce inflation by 0.25% (assumed affects deferred and pensioner increases)

Change mortality assumption to include negative 1 year age rating

The above sensitivities are applied to adjust the defined benefit obligation at the end of the  
reporting period. Whilst the analysis does not take account of the full distribution of cashflows 
expected under the scheme, it does provide an approximation to the sensitivity assumptions shown.

No changes have been made to the method and assumptions used in the analysis from those used  
in the previous period.

Note that some of the changes illustrated above may take the actuarial basis outside a reasonable range.

Approximate impact  
on 2015 deficit

Approximate impact  
on 2014 deficit

-£6m/+£6m

+£6m/-£5m

+£3m

-£5m/+£6m

+£5m/-£5m

+£2m

8. Intangible assets 
Group

Cost

At 1 July 2013

Additions

At 30 June 2014

Additions

Disposals

At 30 June 2015

Accumulated amortisation

At 1 July 2013

Charge

At 30 June 2014

Charge

Disposals

At 30 June 2015

Net book value

At 30 June 2015

At 30 June 2014

At 30 June 2013

Goodwill 
£m

Software 
£m

Total
 £m

1

–

1

–

–

1

–

–

–

–

–

–

1

1

1

2

–

2

–

–

2

1

–

1

–

–

1

1

1

1

3

–

3

–

–

3

1

–

1

–

–

1

2

2

2

9. Property, plant and equipment
Group

Cost

At 1 July 2013

Additions

Disposals

At 30 June 2014

Additions

Transfer from Non-current assets held for resale

Disposals

At 30 June 2015

Accumulated depreciation

At 1 July 2013

Charge

Disposals

At 30 June 2014

Charge

Disposals

At 30 June 2015

Net book value

At 30 June 2015

At 30 June 2014

At 30 June 2013

10. Investments
a. Investments

Joint ventures

Subsidiary companies

Freehold  
property 
£m

Plant and  
machinery 
£m

Fixtures  
and fittings
 £m

Total 
£m

13

–

–

13

–

1

–

14

3

–

–

3

–

–

3

11

10

10

3

–

–

3

–

–

–

3

3

–

–

3

–

–

3

–

–

–

6

1

–

7

1

–

(3)

5

5

1

–

6

1

(3)

4

1

1

1

22

1

–

23

1

1

(3)

22

11

1

–

12

1

(3)

10

12

11

11

Group

Company

2015
£m

17

–

17

2014 
£m

11

–

11

2015 
£m

2014 
£m

–

–

–

–

–

–

112

113

Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Redrow plc Annual Report 2015NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUEDStrategic ReportGovernance ReportFinancial StatementsShareholder Information10. Investments continued
b. Investments in joint ventures

Share of joint venture net assets:

Current assets

Current liabilities

Non-current liabilities

Net (liabilities)

Loans from Group companies(i)

Share of post-tax profits from joint ventures:

Revenue

Cost of sales

Gross profit

Administrative expenses

Operating profit

Finance costs

Profit before tax

Taxation

(i) £15m of the loans to joint ventures are secured (2014: £9m).

The Group’s joint venture investments are:

Group

2015 
£m

Company

2014 
£m

2015 
£m

2014 
£m

14

(5)

(10)

(1)

18

17

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

11

(5)

(7)

(1)

12

11

8

(4)

4

–

4

–

4

(1)

3

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

10. Investments continued
c. Investments in subsidiary undertakings continued
Subsidiaries

Name
HB (HDG) Limited
Redrow Homes Limited
Harrow Estates plc
Redrow Real Estate Limited
Redrow Regeneration plc
Redmira Limited
HB (NW) Limited
HB (LCS) Limited
HB (MID) Limited
HB (SW) Limited
HB (SWA) Limited
HB (Y) Limited
HB (ESTN) Limited
HB (WM) Limited
HB (SM) Limited
HB (SN) Limited
HB (WC) Limited
HB (WX) Limited
HB (EM) Limited
HB (CD) Limited
HB (GRPS) Limited

Company 
Number
1990709
1990710
6825371
3996541
5405272
7587765
1189328
SC38052
2469449
3522335
2230870
2293006
4017345
3379746
3522321
537405
4984069
1940936
2827161
2034733
2898913

Name
HB (CPTS) Limited
HB (SE) Limited
HB (CSCT) Limited
HB (SC) Limited
HB (1995) Limited
Redrow Homes (Wallyford) Limited
Redrow Homes (London) Limited
St David’s Park Limited
PB0311 Limited
Debut Freeholds Limited
Tay Homes (Western) Limited
Tay Homes (Northern) Limited
Tay Homes (Midlands) Limited
Tay Homes (North West) Limited
Redrow Homes (Park Heights) Limited
Blue Capital (Jersey) Limited
Redrow Construction Limited
Poche Interior Design Limited
Redrow (Shareplan) Limited
Imagelines Limited
Redrow (Sudbury) Limited

Company 
Number
1079513
3988594
SC231364
SC74732
SC155021
SC205159
7472674
2479183
7577839
4638403
2806562
2708575
2183136
2189721
66240
110509
1375826
2169473
3520984
3520986
4558070

11. Deferred tax assets and liabilities
The following are the deferred tax assets and liabilities recognised by the Group and the movements thereon during the current and prior year:

•  its 50% shareholding in the ordinary share capital of The Waterford Park Company Limited, a company incorporated in Great Britain with a  

30 June year end. The Waterford Park Company Limited was formed to pursue the potential redevelopment of Watford Junction railway station; and

•  its 50% shareholding in the ordinary share capital of Menta Redrow Limited and Menta Redrow (II) Limited, both companies incorporated in  

Great Britain with a 30 June year end. Menta Redrow Limited and Menta Redrow (II) Limited were formed to pursue redevelopment opportunities 
in Croydon.

c. Investments in subsidiary undertakings

At 1 July 2014 and 30 June 2015

Company 
£m

–

The principal subsidiary company is Redrow Homes Limited. All subsidiary companies are incorporated in Great Britain except Redrow Homes 
(Park Heights) Limited and Blue Capital (Jersey) Limited which are incorporated in Jersey. A full list of subsidiary undertakings as at 30 June 2015 
is shown on page 115. The capital of all the subsidiary companies, consisting of ordinary shares, is wholly owned by HB (HDG) Limited which in 
turn is wholly and directly owned by Redrow plc.

Deferred tax assets
At 1 July 2013
Charge to income
Credit to equity
At 1 July 2014
Charge to income
Charge to equity
At 30 June 2015

Deferred tax liabilities
At 1 July 2013
Credit to income
Credit to equity
At 1 July 2014
Credit to income
Credit to equity
At 30 June 2015

Employee  
benefits 
 £m

Imputed  
interest  
£m

Share‑based  
payment 
 £m

Short term  
temporary  
differences 
 £m

Losses  
carried 
 forward 
 £m

2
–
1
3
–
(2)
1

3
–
–
3
–
–
3

–
–
–
–
–
–
–

5
(4)
–
1
–
–
1

27
(26)
–
1
(1)
–
–

Employee  
benefits  
£m

Imputed 
 interest  
£m

Share‑ based  
payment  
£m

Short term  
temporary 
 differences  
£m

Losses 
 carried  
forward 
 £m

–
–
–  
–
–
–  
–

–
–
–
–
–
–
–

–
–
–
–
–
–
–

(1)
–
–
(1)
–
–
(1)

–
–
–
–
–
–
–

Total  
£m

37
(30)
1
8
(1)
(2)
5

 Total  
£m

(1)
–
–
(1)
–
–
(1)

The Group has no material unrecognised deferred tax assets. The deferred tax balances in the Company relate to a deferred tax asset arising on 
retirement benefit obligations of £4m (2014: £6m).
A Corporation Tax rate of 20% from 1 April 2015 was substantively enacted on 2 July 2013. Accordingly deferred tax balances have been valued  
at the rate of 20% in these financial statements.
Changes to the UK corporation tax rates were announced in the Chancellor’s Budget on 8 July 2015. These include reductions to the main rate to 
reduce the rate to 19% from 1 April 2017 and to 18% from 1 April 2020. As the changes had not been substantively enacted at the balance sheet 
date their effects are not included in these financial statements. The overall effect of these changes, if they had applied to the deferred tax balance 
at the balance sheet date, would not be significant to the Group.

114

115

Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Redrow plc Annual Report 2015NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUEDStrategic ReportGovernance ReportFinancial StatementsShareholder Information12. Trade and other receivables

Non‑current assets

Trade receivables (net) 

Current assets

Trade receivables (net)

Amounts due from subsidiary companies

Other receivables

Prepayments and accrued income

Group

2015
£m

Company

2014 
£m

2015
£m

2014 
£m

13

13

16

–

19

4

39

15

15

21

–

15

6

42

–

–

–

741

–

–

741

–

–

–

622

–

–

622

Trade receivables due after more than one year are stated after an allowance of £13m has been made (2014: £12m) in respect of estimated irrecoverable 
amounts. This allowance is based on an estimate of default rates. £1m provision was made during the year (2014: £3m). £nil was utilised (2014: £nil).  
It is not considered that a material amount of current asset trade receivables are overdue for payment.

Trade and other receivables due between two and five years are £6m (2014: £4m) and due in more than five years are £7m (2014: £11m). The Group 
holds a charge over the underlying assets. At the balance sheet date, there is no material difference between the fair value of trade and other 
receivables and their carrying values as shown in the balance sheet.

13. Inventories

Land for development

Work in progress

Stock of showhomes

Payments on account

Group

Company

2015
£m

1,020

463

54

1,537

(37)

1,500

2014 
£m

802

361

30

1,193

(36)

1,157

2015
£m

2014 
£m

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

Inventories of £826m net of £20m net realisable value provision utilisation, were expensed in the year (2014: £633m net of £21m net realisable value 
provision utilisation). Work in progress includes £3m (2014: £3m) in respect of part exchange properties. Land held for development in the sum of 
£102m is subject to a legal charge as security in respect of deferred consideration (2014: £102m).

The carrying value of undeveloped land where net realisable value has been determined on the basis of a sale of land in its current state is £nil  
(2014: £nil). Of the net realisable value provision of £28m (2014: £48m), £17m (2014: £34m) is attributed to land and £11m (2014: £14m) is 
attributed to work in progress.

As discussed in note 1, the Group considers the carrying value of inventories to be a critical accounting judgement.

13. Inventories continued
The net realisable value provision movement is analysed below:

As at 1 July 2014

Utilised during the year

Created during the year

Released during the year

As at 30 June 2015

Total 
£m

48

(20)

3

(3)

28

The net realisable value provision relates to land with residential planning consent.

The net realisable value provisions of £3m and £3m created and released in the year are the result of our review at the balance sheet date in the 
context of prevailing market conditions and the re-assessment of selling prices and costs. They represent the creation of additional provisions  
against sites acquired pre June 2009 and the reduction of provisions already in place against such sites as required.

14. Financial risk management
The Group’s financial instruments comprise cash and cash equivalents, bank loans and overdrafts, derivative financial instruments and various items 
included within trade receivables and trade payables which arise during the normal course of business.

The tables below provide a summary of financial assets and liabilities by category.

The accounting policies for financial instruments have been applied to the following items: 

The Group

Assets per the balance sheet

Non-current trade and other receivables

Current trade and other receivables

Cash and cash equivalents

Liabilities per the balance sheet

Bank loans and overdrafts

Trade payables and other payables

Land creditors

Other financial liabilities are at amortised cost.

2015
Loans and  
receivables 
£m

2014 
Loans and  
receivables
 £m

13

35

56

104

15

36

55

106

2015 
Other  
financial  
liabilities 
£m

2014 
Other 
 financial  
liabilities 
£m

210

226

266

702

227

162

158

547

116

117

Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Redrow plc Annual Report 2015NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUEDStrategic ReportGovernance ReportFinancial StatementsShareholder Information14. Financial risk management continued
The Company

Assets per the balance sheet

Cash and cash equivalents

Amounts due from subsidiary companies

Liabilities per the balance sheet

Bank loans and overdrafts

Amounts due to subsidiary companies

2015
 Loans and 
receivables
 £m

2014 
Loans and 
receivables
 £m

56

741

797

53

622

675

2015 
Other 
financial 
liabilities 
£m

2014
 Other
 financial 
liabilities 
£m

150

14

164

175

14

189

The Group’s activities expose it to a variety of financial risks.

Financial risk management is conducted centrally using policies approved by the Board. Market risk is negligible due to the Group’s limited exposure 
to equity securities (some limited exposure arises through the Redrow Staff Pension Scheme’s investment portfolio) and the associated price risk. 
Its foreign exchange exposure is negligible given the nature of the Group’s business and its exclusive UK activities.

a. Liquidity risk and interest rate risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Group does not have sufficient financial resources to meet its obligations as they fall due. Liquidity risks are 
managed through the regular review of cash forecasts and by maintaining adequate committed banking facilities to ensure appropriate headroom.

At 30 June 2015, the Group had total unsecured bank borrowing facilities of £368m, representing £365m committed facilities and £3m 
uncommitted facilities.

The Group’s cash surpluses arise from short term timing differences. As a consequence the Group does not consider it bears significant risk of 
changes to income and cash flows as a result of movements on interest rates on its interest bearing assets.

The Group is exposed to interest rate risk as it borrows money at floating rates. The Group’s interest rate risk arises primarily from long term 
borrowings. In order to manage its interest rate risk, the Group from time to time enters into simple risk management products, almost exclusively 
interest rate swaps. All interest rate swaps are sterling denominated. The swaps are arranged so as to match with those of the underlying borrowings 
to which they relate. There was no ineffectiveness to be recorded in respect of these cash flow hedges in 2015 or 2014.

The following table shows the profile of interest bearing debt together with its effective interest rates, after taking account of interest rate swaps  
as at the balance sheet date and the periods in which they will reprice:

Bank overdraft

Bank loans – floating rate

Effective 
interest 
rate
%

2.0

2.7

2015

Zero  
to one 
year 
£m

60

–

60

Total
 £m

60

150

210

One 
 to two 
years
 £m

Two  
to five 
years 
£m

 Effective 
interest 
rate 
%

–

–

–

–

150

150

2.0

2.4

2014

Zero  
to one 
year
 £m

52

–

52

Total 
£m

52

175

227

One  
to two  
years
 £m

Two 
 to five 
years
 £m

–

–

–

–

175

175

14. Financial risk management continued
a. Liquidity risk and interest rate risk continued
The notional principal amounts in respect of the interest rate swaps together with their maturities are given in the table below:

2015

2014

Balance at  
30 June 
£m

–

–

Zero  
to one  
year 
£m

–

–

One  
to two  
years 
£m

–

–

For the year ended 30 June 2015, it is estimated that for any incremental general increase of 1% in interest rates applying for the full year the 
decrease in the Group’s profit before tax would be £2m (2014: £2m).

b. Maturity of bank loans and borrowings
The maturity of bank loans and borrowings is as below:

The Group

Due within one year

Due between one and two years

Due between two and five years

Maturities above include estimated interest payable to the maturity of the facilities.

The Company

Due within one year

Due between one and two years

Due between two and five years

2015
Bank  
overdraft
 £m

60

–

–

60

2015
Bank  
overdraft 
£m

–

–

–

–

2015
Bank  
loans
 £m

–

–

164

164

2015
Bank  
loans 
£m

–

–

164

164

2014 
Bank  
overdraft
 £m

52

–

–

52

2014
Bank  
overdraft 
£m

–

–

–

–

2014
Bank 
 loans
 £m

–

–

190

190

2014
Bank  
loans 
£m

–

–

190

190

Maturities above include estimated interest payable to the maturity of the facilities.

The Company was fully compliant with its banking covenants as at 30 June 2015.

At the year end, the Group and Company had £215m (2014: £190m) of undrawn committed bank facilities available.

There is no material difference between the fair value of the bank overdrafts and bank loans and their carrying values as shown in the balance sheet.

118

119

Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Redrow plc Annual Report 2015NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUEDStrategic ReportGovernance ReportFinancial StatementsShareholder Information14. Financial risk management continued
c. Amounts due in respect of development land
The Group’s policy permits land purchases to be made on deferred payment terms. In accordance with IAS 39, the deferred creditor is recorded at fair 
value and nominal value is amortised over the deferment period via financing costs, increasing the land creditor to its full cash settlement value on 
the payment date.

The interest rate used for each deferred payment is an equivalent loan rate available on the date of land purchase, as applicable to a loan lasting for a 
comparable period of time to that deferment.

The maturity profile of the total contracted cash payments in respect of amounts due in respect of land creditors at the balance sheet date is as follows:

2015

2014

d. Maturity of trade and other payables
These represent current liabilities due within one year.

Balance  
at 30 June 
£m

266

158

Total  
contracted  
cash  
payment 
£m

273

162

Due  
less than  
one year 
£m

182

104

Due 
 between  
one and 
 two years 
£m 

Due  
between  
two and  
five years 
£m

33

34

58

24

e. Credit risk
Credit risk arises from cash and cash equivalents, including call deposits with banks and financial institutions, derivative financial instruments and 
trade receivables. It represents the risk of financial loss where counterparties are unable to meet their obligations.

Credit risk is managed centrally in respect of cash and cash equivalents and derivative financial instruments. In respect of placing deposits with 
banks and financial institutions and funds, individual risk limits are approved by the Board. The table below shows the cash and cash equivalents as 
at the balance sheet date:

Held at Banks with at least an A- credit rating per Standard & Poor

Group

Company

2015
£m

56

56

2014
£m

55

55

2015 
£m

56

56

2014
 £m

53

53

No credit limits were exceeded during the reporting year or subsequently and the Group does not anticipate any losses from non-performance by 
these counterparties.

There is no specific concentration of credit risk in respect of home sales as the exposure is spread over a number of customers. In respect of trade 
receivables, the amounts presented in the balance sheet are stated after adjusting for any doubtful receivables, based on the judgement of the 
Group’s management through using both previous experience and knowledge of the current position of any more substantial receivables.

The Group monitors capital on the basis of the level of returns achieved on its capital base and, with respect to its financing structure, the gearing 
ratio. This is defined as net debt divided by equity.

The Group’s objective in managing capital is to safeguard its ability to continue as a going concern in order to deliver value to its Shareholders and 
other stakeholders. The Group operates within policies outlined by the Board in order to maintain an appropriate funding structure. The Board keeps 
the Group’s capital structure under review.

120

14. Financial risk management continued
f. Capital management continued
The total capital levels and gearing ratios as at 30 June 2015 and 30 June 2014 are as follows:

Total borrowings

Less cash and cash equivalents

Net debt

Equity

Total capital

Gearing ratio

2015
 £m

210

(56)

154

849

1,003

18%

2014
 £m

227

(55)

172

696

868

25%

The Company was fully compliant with its banking covenants at 30 June 2015.

g. Fair values
At 30 June 2015 there is no material difference between the fair value of financial instruments and their carrying values in the balance sheet.

15. Trade and other payables

Non‑current liabilities

Amounts due in respect of development land 

Other payables

Current liabilities

Trade payables

Amounts due in respect of development land

Amounts owed to subsidiary companies

Other payables

Other taxation and social security

Accruals and deferred income

Group

2015
 £m

Company

2014
 £m

2015
 £m

2014
 £m

84

–

84

221

182

–

5

3

60

471

54

–

54

156

104

–

6

–

41

307

–

–

–

–

–

14

–

–

8

22

–

–

–

–

–

14

–

–

6

20

Onerous  
contracts 
£m

Other
 £m

Total 
£m

At 1 July 2014

Provisions created during the year

Provisions released during the year

Provisions utilised during the year

At 30 June 2015

3

–

–

(1)

2

3

2

–

–

5

Provisions relate to onerous contracts (in place at June 2009 and viewed as onerous) and maintenance and sundry remedial costs in respect of 
development activities, which it is assessed will be utilised within four years.

6

2

–

(1)

7

121

f. Capital management
The Group defines total capital as equity plus net debt where net debt is calculated as total borrowings less cash and cash equivalents.

16. Long term provisions
The Group

Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Redrow plc Annual Report 2015NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUEDStrategic ReportGovernance ReportFinancial StatementsShareholder Information17. Share capital

Authorised

480,000,000 ordinary shares of 10p each (2014: 480,000,000) 

Issued and fully paid

As at 1 July 2014 and 30 June 2015

Options granted to Directors and employees under the LTSIP, the CSOP and the SAYE schemes are set out in note 7d.

18. Share capital, share premium account and reserves
The Group

2015 
£m

2014 
£m

48

37

48

37

Number of ordinary 
shares of 10p each

369,799,938

At 1 July 2013

Total comprehensive income

Shares issued

Dividends paid

Share-based payment

Movement in respect of LTSIP/SAYE

At 30 June 2014

Total comprehensive income

Shares issued

Dividends paid

Share-based payment

Movement in respect of LTSIP/SAYE

At 30 June 2015

Share  
premium 
account
 £m

 Other  
reserves 
£m

Share  
capital
 £m

37

–

–

–

–

–

59

–

–

–

–

–

37

59

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

37

59

 Retained 
 earnings
 £m

505

97

–

(7)

–

(3)

592

168

–

(15)

–

–

745

8

–

–

–

–

–

8

–

–

–

–

–

8

Other reserves
Other reserves consists of a £7m Capital redemption reserve (2014: £7m) and a £1m Consolidation reserve (2014: £1m).

Undistributable reserves
Other reserves are not available for distribution.

18. Share capital, share premium account and reserves continued
The Company

At 1 July 2013

Total comprehensive income

Shares issued

Dividends paid

At 30 June 2014

Total comprehensive income†

Shares issued

Dividends paid

At 30 June 2015

†  Includes dividends received from subsidiary companies.

Other reserves
Other reserves consists of a £7m Capital redemption reserve (2014: £7m).

Undistributable reserves
Other reserves are not available for distribution.

19. Movement in net (debt)/cash
The Group

Cash and cash equivalents

Bank overdrafts

Net cash and cash equivalents

Bank loans

Net debt

The Company

Cash and cash equivalents

Bank overdrafts

Net cash and cash equivalents

Bank loans

Net debt

Share  
capital 
£m

Share 
 premium  
account
 £m

Other 
 reserves 
£m

37

–

–

–

37

–

–

–

37

59

–

–

–

59

–

–

–

59

7

–

–

–

7

–

–

–

7

Retained 
 earnings
£m

379

3

–

(7)

375

164

–

(15)

524

At
 1 July 2014 
£m

 Cash flow 
£m

At 
30 June 2015
 £m

55

(52)

3

(175)

(172)

1

(8)

(7)

25

18

56

(60)

(4)

(150)

(154)

At
 1 July 2014 
£m

 Cash flow 
£m

At 
30 June 2015
 £m

53

–

53

(175)

(122)

3

–

3

25

28

56

–

56

(150)

(94)

122

123

Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Redrow plc Annual Report 2015NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUEDStrategic ReportGovernance ReportFinancial StatementsShareholder InformationN OT E S   TO   T H E   FI N A N C I A L   S TAT E M E N T S   C O N T I N U E D

N OT I C E   O F   A N N UA L   G E N E R A L   M E E T I N G

Financial Statements

Shareholder Information

20. Operating lease commitments

Within one year 

Within two to five years 

2015
 £m

3

3

2014 
£m

2

3

21. Contingent liabilities
The Company has guaranteed the bank borrowings of its subsidiaries. Performance bonds, financial guarantees in respect of certain deferred land 
creditors and other building or performance guarantees have been entered into in the normal course of business.

22. Related party transactions
Within the definition of IAS 24 ‘Related party disclosures’, the Board and key management personnel are related parties. Detailed disclosure of the 
remuneration of the Board is given in the Directors’ Remuneration report on pages 70 to 83. A summary of remuneration provided to key 
management personnel is provided in note 7c.

In addition, related party transactions were carried out with parties related to Steve Morgan during the year totalling £0.7m (Company £0.7m), 
primarily relating to the donation to the Morgan Foundation as described in the Directors’ Remuneration report on page 75 and in respect of the 
Group, relating to services provided by Harrow Estates plc on an arm’s length basis under promotional agreements forming part of the acquisition of 
the Harrow business.

As at 30 June 2015, an amount of £nil was due to Harrow Estates plc under normal trading terms.

There have been no other material transactions with key management personnel. There is no other difference between transactions with key 
management personnel of the Company and the Group.

The Company funds the operating companies through both equity investment and loans at commercial rates of interest. In addition, the Company 
provides its subsidiaries with the services of Senior Management, for which a recharge is made to those subsidiary companies based upon utilisation 
of services.

The amount outstanding from subsidiary undertakings at 30 June 2015 was £741m (2014: £622m). The amount owed to subsidiary undertakings at 
30 June 2015 was £14m (2014: £14m).

The Company provided the Group’s defined benefit pension scheme, as detailed in note 7e. Expected service costs were charged to the operating 
businesses at cost. There is no contractual arrangement or stated policy relating to the charge. Experience and actuarial gains are recognised in the 
Company, via the statement of comprehensive income.

The Group did not undertake any transactions with The Waterford Park Company Limited and Menta Redrow and Menta Redrow (II) joint ventures. 
The Group’s loans to its joint ventures are disclosed in note 10.

Notice is hereby given that the Annual General Meeting of Redrow plc 
will be held at Village Urban Resort St. David’s, St. David’s Park, Flintshire 
CH5 3YB on Tuesday 10 November 2015 at 12 noon for the following 
purposes. All resolutions will be proposed as ordinary resolutions except 
numbers 13 and 14 which will be proposed as special resolutions.

Resolution 1 – Annual Report
To receive and adopt the Directors’ report and the financial statements 
for the year ended 30 June 2015, together with the Auditors’ report.

Resolution 2 – Dividend
To declare a final dividend of 4.0p per ordinary share for the year  
ended 30 June 2015.

Resolution 3 – Re‑appointment of Director
To re-appoint Steve Morgan as a Director.

Resolution 4 – Re‑appointment of Director
To re-appoint John Tutte as a Director.

Resolution 5 – Re‑appointment of Director
To re-appoint Barbara Richmond as a Director.

Resolution 6 – Re‑appointment of Director
To re-appoint Debbie Hewitt as a Director.

Resolution 7 – Re‑appointment of Director
To re-appoint Nick Hewson as a Director.

Resolution 8 – Re‑appointment of Director
To re-appoint Liz Peace as a Director.

Resolution 9 – Appointment of Director
To appoint Sir Michael Lyons as a Director.

Resolution 10 – Re‑appointment of Auditors
To re-appoint PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as external Auditors to  
the Company, to hold office until the end of the next general meeting  
at which financial statements are laid before the Company and to 
authorise the Directors to fix their remuneration.

Resolution 11 – Directors’ Remuneration Report
To approve the Directors’ remuneration report (other than the 
remuneration policy) for the year ended 30 June 2015.

Resolution 12 – Authority to Allot Shares
That the Directors, in place of any existing authority conferred upon 
them for the purpose of Section 549/551 of the Companies Act 2006, be 
generally and unconditionally authorised pursuant to and in accordance 
with Section 551 of the Companies Act 2006 to exercise all powers of 
the Company to allot and to make offers or agreements to allot shares 
or grant rights to subscribe shares or convert any securities into shares:

(i)  up to an aggregate nominal amount of £12,326,665; and

(ii) 

 up to a further aggregate nominal amount of £12,326,665 in 
connection with an offer by way of a rights issue.

Provided that this authority shall (unless previously revoked or renewed) 
expire at the conclusion of the next Annual General Meeting of the 
Company (or 31 December 2016 whichever may be the earlier) but so 
that the Company may, before such expiry, make an offer or agreement 
which would or might require shares to be allotted or rights to subscribe 
for or to convert any security into shares to be granted after such expiry 
and the Directors may allot shares or grant rights to subscribe for or 
convert securities into shares in pursuance of such offer or agreement  
as if the authority had not expired.

For the purposes of this Resolution and Resolution 13, ‘rights issue’ 
means an offer to:

(a) 

 ordinary shareholders in proportion (as nearly as may be 
practicable) to their existing holdings; and

(b) 

 people who are holders of other equity securities if this is required 
by the rights of those securities or, if the Directors consider it 
necessary, as permitted by the rights of those securities,

to subscribe further securities by means of the issue of a renounceable 
letter (or other negotiable document) which may be traded for a period 
before payment for the securities is due, but subject in both cases to 
such exclusions or other arrangements as the Directors may deem 
necessary or expedient in relation to treasury shares, fractional 
entitlements, record dates or legal, regulatory or practical problems  
in, or under the laws of, any territory.

124

125

Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Strategic ReportGovernance ReportShareholder InformationN OT I C E   O F   A N N UA L   G E N E R A L   M E E T I N G   C O N T I N U E D

Financial Statements

Shareholder Information

Resolution 13 – Authority to Disapply Pre‑emption Rights
That, subject to the passing of Resolution 12, the Directors be given 
power to make allotments of equity securities (as defined in Section 
560(1) of the Companies Act 2006) wholly for cash:

(i) 

 pursuant to the authority given by paragraph (i) of Resolution 12 
and to sell shares which are held in treasury pursuant to Section 
560(3) of the Companies Act 2006 and in each case:

a) 

in connection with a pre-emptive offer; and 

b) 

 otherwise than in connection with a pre-emptive offer, up to an 
aggregate nominal amount of £1,849,000; and

(ii) 

 pursuant to the authority given by paragraph (ii) of Resolution 12 in 
connection with a pre-emptive rights issue,

as if Section 561(1) of the Act did not apply to any such allotment, and 
such power shall (unless previously revoked or renewed) expire at the 
earlier of the conclusion of next Annual General Meeting of the 
Company, or 31 December 2016 save that the said power shall permit 
the Company to make an offer or enter into an agreement before the 
expiry of such power which would or might require equity securities to 
be allotted after such expiry and the Directors may allot equity 
securities in pursuance of such offer or agreement as if such power 
conferred had not expired. For the purposes of this Resolution, the 
nominal amount of any securities shall be taken to be, in the case of 
rights to subscribe for or convert any securities into shares of the 
Company, the nominal amount of such shares which may be allotted 
pursuant to such rights.

For the purposes of this Resolution:

“pre-emptive offer” means an offer of equity securities open for 
acceptance for a period fixed by the Directors to (a) holders (other than 
the Company) on the register on a record date fixed by the Directors of 
ordinary shares in proportion to their respective holdings and (b) other 
persons so entitled by virtue of the rights attaching to any other equity 
securities held by them, but subject in both cases to such exclusions or 
other arrangements as the Directors may deem necessary or expedient in 
relation to treasury shares, fractional entitlements, record dates or legal, 
regulatory or practical problems in, or under the laws of, any territory.

Resolution 14 – Calling of a General Meeting other than  
an Annual General Meeting
That a general meeting other than the Annual General Meeting may  
be called on not less than 14 clear days’ notice.

By order of the Board

Graham Cope
Company Secretary

7 September 2015

Registered office: 
Redrow House 
St. David’s Park 
Flintshire 
CH5 3RX 
Registered in England Number 2877315

Notes:
(i) 

 A Shareholder entitled to attend and vote may appoint a proxy or proxies to attend, 
speak and vote instead of him. A proxy need not be a member of the Company. A 
member may appoint more than one proxy, provided that each proxy is appointed 
to exercise the rights attached to a different share or shares held by him.

(ii) 

(iii) 

(iv) 

(v) 

(vi) 

 A form of proxy is enclosed which, if required, should be completed in accordance 
with the instructions set out therein and returned so as to reach the Company’s 
Registrars not later than 48 hours before the time of the meeting or any 
adjourned meeting. Completion of a form of proxy will not preclude a 
Shareholder from attending and voting at the meeting in person if they so wish.

 All Shareholders on the Register at 6.00pm on 6 November 2015 (or if the 
meeting is adjourned 48 hours before the time fixed for the meeting) and only 
those Shareholders are entitled to attend and vote at the Annual General Meeting 
in respect of the number of shares registered in their respective names at that 
time. Changes to entries on the Register after that time will be disregarded in 
determining the rights of any person to attend or vote at the meeting.

 The right to appoint a proxy does not apply to persons whose shares are held  
on their behalf by another person and who have been nominated to receive 
communications from the Company in accordance with Section 146 of the 
Companies Act 2006 (‘nominated persons’). Nominated persons may have a  
right under an agreement with the member who holds the shares on their behalf 
to be appointed (or to have someone else appointed) as a proxy. Alternatively, if 
nominated persons do not have such a right, or do not wish to exercise it, they 
may have a right under such an agreement to give instructions to the person 
holding the shares as to the exercise of voting rights.

 Any corporation which is a member can appoint one or more corporate 
representatives who may exercise on its behalf all of its powers as a member 
provided that they do not do so in relation to the same shares.

 Holders of ordinary shares are entitled to attend and vote at general meetings of 
the Company. The total number of issued ordinary shares in the Company on 7 
September 2015 is 369,799,938, carrying one vote each on a poll. Therefore, the 
total number of votes exercisable as at 7 September 2015 is 369,799,938.

 Shareholders should note that, under Section 527 of the Companies Act 2006, 
members meeting the threshold requirements set out in that section have the right 
to require the Company to publish on a website a statement setting out  
any matter relating to: (i) the audit of the Company’s accounts (including the 
Auditors’ report and the conduct of the audit) that are to be laid before the Annual 
General Meeting for the financial year beginning 1 July 2014; or (ii) any circumstance 
connected with an auditor of the Company appointed for the financial year beginning 
1 July 2014 ceasing to hold office since the previous meeting at which annual 
accounts and reports were laid. The Company may not require the Shareholders 
requesting any such website publication to pay its expenses in complying with 
Sections 527 or 528 (requirements as to website availability) of the Companies Act 
2006. Where the Company is required to place a statement on a website under 
Section 527 of the Companies Act 2006, it must forward the statement to the 
Company’s Auditors not later than the time when it makes the statement available 
on the website. The business which may be dealt with at the Annual General Meeting 
for the relevant financial year includes any statement that the Company has been 
required under Section 527 of the Companies Act 2006 to publish on a website.

 Members may not use any electronic address provided in either this notice  
of meeting or any related documents (including the enclosed form of proxy)  
to communicate with the Company for any purposes other than those  
expressly stated.

(vii) 

 Any member attending the meeting has the right to ask questions. The Company 
must cause to be answered any such question relating to the business being dealt 
with at the meeting but no such answer need be given if: (a) to do so would 
interfere unduly with the preparation for the meeting or involve the disclosure of 
confidential information; (b) the answer has already been given on a website in 
the form of an answer to a question; or (c) it is undesirable in the interests of the 
Company or the good order of the meeting that the question be answered.

(viii)   A copy of this notice and other information required by Section 311A of the 

Companies Act 2006 can be found at www.redrow.co.uk.

(ix) 

 If you are in any doubt as to what action you should take, you are recommended 
to immediately seek your own personal financial advice from your stockbroker, 
bank manager, solicitor, accountant or other independent financial adviser duly 
authorised under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000.

(x) 

(xi) 

 If you have sold or otherwise transferred all of your ordinary shares in the 
Company, please forward this document, together with the accompanying Form 
of Proxy, as soon as possible to the purchaser or transferee or to the stockbroker, 
bank manager, or other agent through whom the sale or transfer was effected for 
onward transmission to the purchaser or transferee.

 Under Section 338 and Section 338A of the Companies Act 2006, members 
meeting the threshold requirements in those sections have the right to require 
the Company: (i) to give, to members of the Company entitled to receive notice 
of the meeting, notice of a resolution which may properly be moved and is 
intended to be moved at the meeting; and/or (ii) to include in the business to be 
dealt with at the meeting any matter (other than a proposed resolution) which 
may be properly included in the business. A resolution may properly be moved or 
a matter may properly be included in the business unless: (a) (in the case of a 
resolution only) it would, if passed, be ineffective (whether by reason of 
inconsistency with any enactment or the Company’s constitution or otherwise); 
(b) it is defamatory of any person; or (c) it is frivolous or vexatious. Such a request 
may be in hard copy form or in electronic form, must identify the resolution of 
which notice is to be given or the matter to be included in the business, must be 
authorised by the person or persons making it, must be received by the Company 
not later than 26 September 2015, being the date six clear weeks before the 
meeting, and (in the case of a matter to be included in the business only) must be 
accompanied by a statement setting out the grounds for the request.

(xii) 

 Copies of the Directors’ service contracts will be available for inspection at the 
registered office during normal business hours on any business day and at the 
place of the Annual General Meeting for at least 15 minutes before the meeting  
is held until its conclusion.

(xiii)   The register of Directors’ interests in the share capital of the Company will  
be available for inspection at the place of the meeting from 11.45am on 
10 November 2015 until the conclusion of the meeting. None of the Directors 
has a service contract which cannot be terminated within one year without 
payment of compensation.

(xiv)   CREST members who wish to appoint a proxy or proxies through the CREST 

electronic proxy appointment service may do so for the meeting (and any 
adjournment of the meeting) by following the procedures described in the CREST 
Manual. CREST Personal Members or other CREST sponsored members (and those 
CREST members who have appointed a voting service provider) should refer to 
their CREST sponsor or voting service provider, who will be able to take the 
appropriate action on their behalf.

(xv) 

 In order for a proxy appointment or instruction made by means of CREST to be 
valid, the appropriate CREST message (a ‘CREST Proxy Instruction’) must be 
properly authenticated in accordance with Euroclear’s specifications and must 
contain the information required for such instructions, as described in the CREST 
Manual (available via www.euroclear.com/CREST). The message (regardless of 
whether it constitutes the appointment of a proxy or an amendment to the 
instruction given to a previously appointed proxy) must, in order to be valid, be 
transmitted so as to be received by the issuer’s agent (ID 3RA50) by the latest 
time(s) for receipt of proxy appointments specified in note (ii) above. For this 
purpose, the time of receipt will be taken to be the time (as determined by the 
timestamp applied to the message by the CREST Applications Host) from which 
the issuer’s agent is able to retrieve the message by enquiry to CREST in the 
manner prescribed by CREST. After this time any change of instructions to a 
proxy appointed through CREST should be communicated to him by other means.

(xvi)   CREST members (and, where applicable, their CREST sponsors or voting service 

providers) should note that Euroclear does not make available special procedures 
in CREST for any particular messages. Normal system timings and limitations will 
therefore apply in relation to the input of CREST Proxy Instructions. It is the 
responsibility of the CREST member concerned to take (or, if the CREST member 
is a CREST personal member or sponsored member or has appointed a voting 
service provider, to procure that his CREST sponsor or voting service provider 
takes) such action as shall be necessary to ensure that a message is transmitted 
by means of the CREST system by any particular time. In this connection, CREST 
members (and, where applicable, their CREST sponsors or voting service 
providers) are referred, in particular, to those sections of the CREST Manual 
concerning practical limitations of the CREST system and timings.

(xvii)  The Company may treat as invalid a CREST Proxy Instruction in the circumstances 

set out in Regulation 35(5)(a) of the Uncertificated Securities Regulations 2001.

(xviii)  If you have any questions about the meeting or need any special assistance at the 
meeting, please contact the Company Secretary at the registered office or 
telephone 01244 520044 during normal business hours.

126

127

Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Strategic ReportGovernance Report 
 
 
N OT I C E   O F   A N N UA L   G E N E R A L   M E E T I N G   C O N T I N U E D

G LO S S A RY

Financial Statements

Shareholder Information

Explanatory Notes to Annual General Meeting Resolutions:
Resolutions 1 to 12 are proposed as ordinary resolutions. This means 
that for each of those resolutions to be passed, more than half of the 
votes cast must be in favour of the resolution. Resolutions 13 and 14  
are proposed as special resolutions. This means that for each of those 
resolutions to be passed, at least three-quarters of the votes cast must 
be in favour of the resolution.

Resolution 2 – Dividend
Subject to approval at the meeting, the dividend will be paid on 
13 November 2015 to shareholders on the register at the close of 
business on 25 September 2015.

Resolutions 3–9 – Re-appointment and appointment of Directors
As required by the UK Corporate Governance Code, all Directors retire 
and offer themselves for re-election. Following changes to the Listing 
Rules which took effect in May 2014, Resolutions 6, 7, 8 and 9 must be 
approved both by a simple majority of all Shareholders, and by a simple 
majority of the independent Shareholders (that is all Shareholders other 
than Steve Morgan and his concert parties). For full biographies of all 
Directors and further details in relation to their re-election, please see 
page 61 and page 63.

Resolution 10 – Re-appointment of Auditors
The Company is required to appoint Auditors at every general  
meeting at which the accounts are presented to Shareholders.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP were appointed at last year’s Annual 
General Meeting and are willing to seek re-appointment this year. It is 
normal practice for a Company’s Directors to be authorised to agree  
the Auditors’ fees. If this resolution is passed, the Audit Committee  
will approve the fees for recommendation to the Board.

Resolution 11 – Directors’ remuneration
This resolution deals with the remuneration of the directors and  
seeks approval of the remuneration paid to the directors during the  
year under review respectively.

The Company is required to ask shareholders to approve the Directors’ 
Remuneration Report. This is set out on pages 70 to 83 of the  
Annual Report. Resolution 11 is an advisory vote.

Resolution 12 – Authority to allot shares
Shareholders are being invited to renew the authority given to Directors 
in previous years to allot new shares. If passed, Resolution 12 would 
renew this authority by authorising the Directors to allot shares up to  
an aggregate nominal amount of £12,326,665 (which is equivalent to 
approximately 33% of the total issued ordinary share capital of the 
Company, exclusive of treasury shares, as at 7 September 2015) and a 
further £12,326,665 only in respect of a rights issue (which is equivalent 
to approximately 33% of the total issued ordinary share capital of the 
Company, exclusive of treasury shares as at 7 September 2015). This is  
in line with corporate governance guidelines. The authority will expire  
at the conclusion of the next Annual General Meeting of the Company 
or, if earlier, 31 December 2016.

The Company does not, as of 7 September 2015 hold any shares  
in treasury.

The Directors will exercise the authority to allot only when satisfied  
that it is in the interests of the Company to do so. 

There are no present plans to undertake a rights issue or to allot new 
shares other than in connection with employee share and incentive 
plans. The Directors consider it desirable to have the maximum 
flexibility permitted by corporate governance guidelines to respond to 
market developments and to enable allotments to take place to finance 
business opportunities as they arise.

Resolution 13 – Authority to disapply pre-emption rights
The Directors may only allot shares and other equity securities, or sell 
treasury shares, for cash (other than in connection with an employee 
share scheme) to persons who are not already Shareholders in the 
Company if authorised to do so by the Shareholders in a general 
meeting. The purpose of paragraph (i) of Resolution 13 is to authorize 
the Directors to allot new shares pursuant to the authority given in 
paragraph (i) of Resolution 12, or sell treasury shares, for cash in 
connection with a pre-emptive offer or rights issue, or (ii) otherwise up 
to an aggregate nominal amount of £1,849,000, in each case without 
first offering them to existing members. The sum in (ii) represents 
approximately 5% of the Company’s current issued share capital 
(excluding treasury shares) as at 7 September 2015. The resolution also 
enables the Directors to modify the strict requirements for a rights issue 
in circumstances where they consider it necessary or expedient.

In addition, if the Company has purchased its own shares and holds them 
in treasury, this resolution would give the Directors power to sell these 
shares for cash to persons other than existing Shareholders, subject to the 
same limit that would apply to issues of shares for cash to these persons.

The Board considers the authority in Resolution 12 to be appropriate in 
order to allow the Company flexibility to finance business opportunities or 
to conduct a pre-emptive offer or rights issue without the need to comply 
with the strict requirements of the statutory pre-emption provisions.

The authority will expire on whichever is the earlier of the conclusion  
of the next Annual General Meeting or 31 December 2016.

Resolution 14 – Calling of a general meeting other than an  
Annual General Meeting
Under the Companies Act 2006 the notice period required for general 
meetings of the Company is 21 days unless Shareholders approve a 
shorter notice period, which cannot, however, be less than 14 clear days. 
Annual General Meetings of the Company will continue to be held on at 
least 21 clear days’ notice.

Resolution 14 seeks such approval. The approval will be effective until 
the Company’s next Annual General Meeting, when it is intended that a 
similar resolution will be prepared.

Documents Available for your Inspection
Copies of the following documents will be available for inspection during 
normal business hours on Monday to Friday each week (public holiday 
excepted) at the Company’s registered office and at the office of 
Linklaters LLP at One Silk Street, London EC2Y 8HQ from the date of this 
document up to and including the date of the Annual General Meeting 
and at the place of the Annual General Meeting from 11.45am until the 
close of the meeting:

•  the Articles of Association and Memorandum of the Company; and

•  the service agreements and letters of appointment of the Directors. 

NPPF
The National Policy Planning Framework

HBF
Home Builders Federation

NHBC
National House-Building Council 

How Key Performance Indicator Measures are Calculated:

Land bank years
No. of plots in owned land bank at 30 June divided by  
no. of legal completions in financial year

Sales outlets 
No. of sales outlets open at 30 June

Private reservation rate
No. of private reservations per week in financial  
year divided by average no. of sales outlets

Revenue
Revenue per consolidated income statement

Number of trainees
No. of trainees at 30 June

Five star customer satisfaction rating
Independent HBF customer satisfaction rating

Accident incident rate by site
No. of notifiable accidents in financial year divided by  
average no. of sites

Return on capital employed (ROCE)
Operating profit before exceptional items adjusted for joint  
ventures as a percentage of opening and closing capital employed

Return on equity (ROE)
Profit before tax before exceptional items adjusted for joint  
ventures as a percentage of opening and closing net assets

Earnings per share (EPS)
Profit attributable to ordinary equity shareholders (excluding  
exceptional items and deferred tax rate changes) divided by  
the weighted average no. of ordinary shares in issue during  
the financial year

128

129

Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Strategic ReportGovernance ReportFinancial Statements

Shareholder Information

FI V E   Y E A R   S U M M A RY
12 MONTHS ENDED 30 JUNE

Revenue

Operating profit before exceptional items and financing costs

Operating profit before exceptional items and financing costs  
as a percentage of turnover

Profit before tax

Net assets

Net debt

2011  
£m

453

31

2012  
£m

479

48

2013* 
£m

605

73

2014  
£m

864

138

2015  
£m

1,150

213

6.9%

10.0%

12.1%

15.9%

18.5%

25

459

(75)

43

562

(14)

69

609

(91)

133

696

(172)

204

849

(154)

Gearing – net debt as a percentage of capital and reserves

16.4%

2.5%

14.9%

24.8%

18.1%

Return on capital employed – operating profit before exceptional  
items adjusted for joint ventures as a percentage of opening and  
closing capital employed

Return on equity

Number of legal completions

Earnings per ordinary share

Dividends paid per ordinary share

Net assets per ordinary share

* Restated to reflect the application of IAS 19R – Employee Benefits.

6.1%

5.7%

2,626

4.4p

–

8.7%

8.4%

2,458

9.7p

–

12.2%

12.3%

2,827

14.6p

–

18.0%

20.5%

3,597

28.3p

2.0p

22.8%

26.4%

4,022

44.5p

4.0p

148.6p

151.8p

165.0p

188.1p

229.5p

CO R P O R AT E   A N D   S H A R E H O L D E R   I N F O R M AT I O N

Shareholder Discounts
The Company offers a discount of 1% to Shareholders off the purchase 
price of a new Redrow home. In order to qualify for the discount a 
purchaser must hold a minimum of 2,500 ordinary shares in Redrow plc 
for a minimum of 12 months prior to the date of reservation, subject to 
a cap of £5,000.

Details of our current developments are available on our website:  
www.redrow.co.uk 

Group Contacts 
Officers and advisers

Company Secretary 
Graham Cope

Registered Office
Redrow House 
St. David’s Park 
Flintshire 
CH5 3RX 
Registered Number 2877315

Registrars
Computershare Investor Services PLC 
The Pavilions 
Bridgwater Road 
Bristol 
BS99 6ZZ

Stockbrokers
Barclays 
5 The North Colonnade 
Canary Wharf 
London E14 4BB

Peel Hunt  
Moor House 
120 London Wall 
London 
EC2Y 5ET

Independent Auditors
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 
Chartered Accountants and Statutory Auditors 
101 Barbirolli Square 
Lower Mosley Street 
Manchester 
M2 3PW

Solicitors
Linklaters LLP 
One Silk Street 
London  
EC2Y 8HQ

130

131

Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Strategic ReportGovernance ReportN OT E S

Strategic Report

Governance Report

Financial Statements

Shareholder Information

132

Redrow plc Annual Report 2015

Redrow plc Annual Report 2015

133
133

Redrow plc Annual Report 2015Strategic ReportGovernance ReportFinancial StatementsShareholder InformationRedrow plc

A N N U A L   R E P O R T   2 0 1 5

R
e
d
r
o
w
p
l
c

A
n
n
u
a
l

R
e
p
o
r
t
2
0
1
5

Redrow plc

Redrow House, St. David’s Park, Flintshire CH5 3RX
Tel: 01244 520044 Fax: 01244 520720

Email: groupservices@redrow.co.uk