Quarterlytics / Healthcare / Reliq Health Technologies / FY2014 Annual Report

Reliq Health Technologies
Annual Report 2014

RHT · ASX Healthcare
Claim this profile
Ticker RHT
Exchange ASX
Sector Healthcare
Industry
Employees 11-50
← All annual reports
FY2014 Annual Report · Reliq Health Technologies
Loading PDF…
AnnuAl RepoRt 2014

Directors
Dr Martin Blake
Non-executive Chairman

Ms Liza Dunne
Managing Director

Mr Simon Panton
Non-executive Director

Dr Timothy St Pierre
Executive Director

Dr Jason Loveridge
Non-executive Director

company secretary
Mr Adrian Bowers

securities exchange  
listing
Resonance Health Limited shares are listed  
on the Australian Securities Exchange.
ASX Code: RHT

registereD office  
anD principal place  
of business
Ground Floor,
278 Stirling Highway
CLAREMONT WA 6010
Telephone: +61 8 9286 5300
Facsimile: +61 8 9286 1179

postal aDDress
PO Box 1135
NEDLANDS WA 6909

Website anD e-mail aDDress
www.resonancehealth.com
Email: info@ferriscan.com

auDitors
HLB Mann Judd
Level 4,
130 Stirling Street
PERTH WA 6000

share registry
Advanced Share Registry Ltd
110 Stirling Highway
NEDLANDS WA 6009
Tel: +61 8 9389 8033
Fax: +61 8 9389 7871

bankers
National Australia Bank Limited

solicitors
Steinepreis Paganin
Level 4, The Reed Building
16 Milligan Street
PERTH WA 6000

ResonAnce heAlth limited

Corporate InformatIon 
Chairman and Managing Director’s Report 

Snap Shot 

Year in Review 

Directors’ Report  

Corporate Governance Statement  

Auditor’s Independence Declaration  

Statement of Comprehensive Income  

Statement of Financial Position  

Statement of Changes in Equity  

Statement of Cash Flows  

Notes to the Financial Statements  

Directors’ Declaration  

Independent Auditor’s Report  

Shareholders 

page

2

3

4

7

16

22

23

24

25

26

27

54

55

57

our business

Resonance  Health  specialises  in  the  development 
and  delivery  of  medical  imaging  software  and 
services.  The  Company’s  products  are  used  by 
clinicians in the diagnosis and management of human 
disease and by pharmaceutical companies in their 
clinical trials. Resonance Health has demonstrated 
its  expertise  in  liver  imaging  technologies  with 

FerriScan®,  now  globally  recognised  as  the  gold 
standard in the measurement of liver iron overload. 
Our most recent product HepaFat-Scan® has gained 
regulatory  clearance  for  the  measurement  of  liver 
fat  in  the  US,  Europe  and  Australia  and  a  pipeline 
product  for  the  measurement  of  liver  fibrosis  is  
in development.

AnnuAl RepoRt 2014 

1

ContentsFinancial year 2014 saw strong growth 
in FerriScan® sales and the regulatory 
clearance of our new product  
HepaFat-Scan®. 

Our focus on the coming year is to 
explore a range of commercialisation 
initiatives for HepaFat-Scan® and 
continue with our development of an 
MRI liver fibrosis test.

Following the capital raise completed 
mid-year, we have the funds to invest 
in these two key initiatives. 

We plan to invest funds into the 
automation of HepaFat-Scan® with 
the longer term objective of enabling 
radiology facilities anywhere in the world 
to use the HepaFat-Scan® technology in 
a cloud based solution. This provides the 
opportunity to deliver the HepaFat-Scan® 
technology in a very cost effective way 
whilst protecting the key aspects of the 
underlying IP. Work has commenced to 
investigate this solution. 

In the meantime, we are providing 
HepaFat-Scan® through the Company’s 
traditional business model whereby 
image data is uploaded to the 
Company’s secure web facility and 
Resonance Health provides the result 
back to the radiology facility. This central 
lab for image analysis is ideally suited 
to the provision of services for clinical 
trials where a centralised and quality 
controlled analysis facility is required. 
With a large number of therapies now 
in development for fatty liver disease, 
clinical trials provide a significant target 
market for the Company.

Some of our existing customers are 
now piloting HepaFat-Scan® and 
providing us with feedback on the 
service. We are also engaging with 
medical practitioners across several 
disciplines that have an interest in 
the health consequences of fatty liver 
disease. We engaged a consulting firm 
to canvas a range of medical specialist 
groups regarding the potential utility of 
HepaFat-Scan® in their specific fields 
of medicine. Apart from damage that 
may be caused to the liver tissue there 
are other serious consequences for 
fatty liver disease. Fatty liver disease is 
closely associated with diabetes and 
recent studies have shown a direct 
link to liver cancer without progressing 
through liver fibrosis. Fatty liver 
disease is also the number one risk 
factor for cardiovascular disease. 

The regulatory clearances gained 
during the year for HepaFat-Scan® 
are an important first step in the 
commercialisation path. Our pilot site 
customers are providing us invaluable 
feedback and a validation study is 
being planned to provide further peer 
reviewed data to support the product. 
Clinical studies and publications 
regarding the value of HepaFat-Scan® 
in specific clinical applications will be 
important as we seek to have HepaFat-
Scan® included in clinical guidelines in 
the future. 

Resonance Health is delighted to be 
invited to join the Forum on Facilitating 
Drug Development for the Treatment 
of Liver Disease. The US based 
Forum provides the opportunity for 
key opinion leaders and stakeholders 
to work together in the development 
of safe and effective therapies and 
diagnostic tools to treat liver disease. 
Stakeholders include the US National 
Institutes of Health (NIH), the US 
Food and Drug Administration (FDA), 
specialist physicians, academics, 
patient communities and major 
pharmaceutical companies. 

Investment will also continue into the 
development of an MRI diagnostic test 
for liver fibrosis. This continues to be a 
key pillar of our liver diagnostic portfolio 
and we have been buoyed by the results 
we have achieved. Patients with liver 
disease require a non-invasive test to 
accurately grade the liver fibrosis so 
appropriate treatment decisions can 
be made. The earlier the diagnosis, 
the better the outcome for the patient. 
A liver biopsy is still the gold standard 
test for diagnosing liver fibrosis. Due to 
the risks involved in this procedure, it 
is often delayed until liver damage has 
become extensive.

The Company has conducted two 
clinical studies in recent years that 
have provided a complex and very 
large amount of imaging data for the 
liver fibrosis project. The work that 
has been performed to date has 
provided some promising results. 
We are committing additional funds 
to this project as we believe it has 
the potential to deliver an exciting 
new technology to address a large 
unmet clinical need. We are also 
actively seeking partnerships with 
research groups, universities and 
government agencies to partner with 
the development of the technology.   

Operationally, the 2014 financial year 
delivered strong growth in the Services 
Business Unit. Sales volumes were up 
32% on the prior year and revenue was 
$2.28 million, up 50%. A profit of $662k 
was reported in the Services Business 
Segment compared to a profit of $71k 
in the prior year. The growth in the 
number of radiology facilities providing 
FerriScan® and increase in the number 
of referring doctors provides a solid 
base for growth.

A net loss after tax of $72k was reported 
compared to a net loss in the prior year 
of $204k. The company increased its 
cash holdings from $1.1 to $2.1m at 
the end of the reporting period. This 
included funds received of $1.277m in 
the 2014 financial year from the rights 
issue and placement of shares. A further 
$650k was received after 30 June 2014, 
making the total cash contributed from 
the capital raise of $1.927m.

The outlook for the company is good. 
The FerriScan® business unit is cash 
flow positive, profitable and growing. 
HepaFat-Scan® for the diagnosis of 
fatty liver disease has gained regulatory 
clearance and is ideally suited for the 
clinical trial sector for pharmaceutical 
therapies in development for fatty 
liver disease. The capital raised will 
enable the company to continue its 
progress towards the development of 
an MRI test to accurately diagnosis the 
presence and degree of liver fibrosis, 
with the goal of replacing the need for 
an invasive liver biopsy.

Liza Dunne 
Managing Director

Dr Martin Blake 
Chairman

2 

ResonAnce heAlth limited

Chairman and managing direCtor’s report23 consecutive months of year on year sales volume growth

50% increase in sales revenue from the previous year

50+ new radiology centres using FerriScan®

33% increase in referring clinicians from the previous year

FDA, TGA and CE Mark clearance for HepaFat-Scan®

Commercial roll out for HepaFat-Scan® commenced

10%
2011

14%
2012

2010

11%
2013

32%
2014

Annual Sales Volume Growth

32%  

increase in  
sales volumes  
from 2012

AnnuAl RepoRt 2014 

3

Snap Shotferriscan® 

Key Features of HepaFat-Scan®

HepaFat-Scan® provides an 
accurate volume percentage of  
fat in liver tissue. 

HepaFat-Scan® has  
been clinically validated 
against independent biopsy 
measurements of liver fat.

HepaFat-Scan® imaging can  
be performed on standard 1.5 
Tesla MRI scanners.

HepaFat-Scan® is a very quick  
1 minute MRI scan.

HepaFat-Scan® is provided  
as an image analysis service  
with a fee charged for  
each analysis performed.

There is no requirement for  
radiology customers to purchase 
new software or hardware.

HepaFat-Scan® results are 
reliable and reproducible 
between MRI centres and models 
of scanners.

Large liver region is included in 
the analysis, 300 times larger 
than a liver biopsy sample 
providing a more accurate result.

FerriScan® continues to be the global gold standard 
method-of-choice for the measurement of liver  
iron concentration. 

In addition to clinicians utilising FerriScan® for the management of patients 
with iron overload conditions, major pharmaceutical companies choose 
FerriScan® for the assessment of iron chelators in clinical trials.

The regulated and quality-assured service model provided by Resonance  
Health provides clinicians, pharmaceutical companies and patients with  
accurate and reliable results with which to make informed treatment decisions.

In addition to FerriScan®, an increasing number of our customers are also 
utilising our Cardiac T2* measurement service to assess the cardiac iron of 
their patients. In some medical conditions cardiac iron overload can occur 
once a certain liver iron threshold is reached. A Cardiac T2* measurement 
can provide important information for assessing the risk of cardiac failure and 
arrhythmia in patients with iron overload. 

FerriScan® and Cardiac T2*  
Sales Growth

Partnerships with  
Pharmaceutical Companies

Resonance Health has been working 
with pharmaceutical companies 
developing iron chelation drugs for over 
ten years. FerriScan® provides a definitive 
measurement of a patient’s liver iron 
concentration and is used to assess the 
efficacy of iron chelation drugs under 
development in clinical trials.

Resonance Health has also been 
working in partnership with major 
pharmaceutical companies to  
improve the health outcomes of 
patients suffering from iron  
overload conditions. The program 
involve pharmaceutical companies 
purchasing FerriScans® so patients 
can be accurately assessed for  
iron overload.

hepafat-scan®

Resonance Health is delighted 
to have achieved 23 consecutive 
months of sales volume growth.  
The 2013-2014 financial year had 
a sales volume growth of 32% 
compared to the previous year  
which delivered a 50% growth in 
revenue year on year. 

FerriScan® availability  
continues to spread globally

FerriScan® is now available in more 
than 200 radiology centres in over  
30 countries. The 2013-2014  
financial year saw a substantial 
increase in the number of new 
FerriScan® centres with over 60  
new facilities set up for FerriScan® 
during the year. 

FerriScan® also became available in  
6 new countries during the year: 
Algeria, Bulgaria, Israel, Kuwait, 
Morocco and South Africa. 14 
additional FerriScan® facilities came 
on line in the UK during the year, 11 in 
Australia, 8 in Italy and 7 in the USA.

The referrer base for FerriScan® and 
Cardiac T2* continues to grow with a 
33% increase in the number of referring 
clinicians from the previous year. This 
demonstrates the growing level of trust 
and acceptance of the technology in 
the medical industry.

4 

ResonAnce heAlth limited

HepaFat-Scan® gained international regulatory clearance in 
the US (Food and Drug Administration), Europe (CE Mark) and 
Australia (Therapeutic Goods Administration) during the year. 

The 2013-2014 financial year welcomed some exciting milestones for Resonance Health 
with  the  launch  of  our  new  HepaFat-Scan®  technology.  HepaFat-Scan®  is  a  software 
solution that enables the accurate measurement of liver fat using MRI scanners. 

HepaFat-Scan®  can  be  used  for  the  screening,  diagnosis,  treatment  planning  and 
monitoring of patients in a variety of clinical conditions that involve elevated liver fat.

Year in review 2014Key Features of HepaFat-Scan®

Fatty Liver Disease  

Fatty liver disease is a build-up of excess fat in the liver cells. In some cases, fatty 
liver disease damages the organ and leads to serious complications such as liver 
cirrhosis and cancer. Risk factors for fatty liver disease include overweight and 
obesity, diabetes and elevated triglyceride levels. The damage caused by fatty 
liver disease can often be halted or reversed if diagnosed before damage to the 
liver has occurred. HepaFat-Scan® enables patients to be accurately diagnosed 
for fatty liver disease utilising MRI scanners.

Fatty  liver  disease  is  a  major  healthcare  burden  in  developed  countries.  The 
prevalence of the disease is expected to increase with the global obesity epidemic 
and the trend in developing countries towards the Western lifestyles.

Fatty liver disease is projected to be the 
leading cause of liver transplants in the 
US by 2020.

An estimated one in five people in the United Kingdom have 
Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD). The cost to the 
National Health Service is estimated to be £4.2 billion and will 
be double that by 2050.

An estimated 20%-30% 
of the US population 
has fatty liver disease

The prevalence of NAFLD in urban India 
is 20-30% and accounted for almost 50% 
of the cases of liver cirrhosis 

The prevalence 
of fatty liver 
disease in China 
has doubled in 
the last 10 years 

5.5 million 
Australians have 
fatty liver disease 
including 40% of all 
adults over 50.

In the United States, liver 
biopsies performed on potential 
liver donors revealed that 20% of 
donors were ineligible for organ 
donation based on the degree of 
the steatosis (>30%).

Diagnostic Advantage of  
HepaFat-Scan®

A liver biopsy is the gold stand test 
to diagnose fatty liver disease. Due 
to the risks involved in the procedure, 
imaging alternatives are preferred. An 
ultrasound is often used to detect the 
presence of fat in the liver. However, 
ultrasound can only detect very high 
levels of fat (>30%) yet liver fat levels 
over 5% are considered abnormal.

HepaFat-Scan® provides the  
medical community with a safe,  
non-invasive accurate measurement 
of the percentage of the liver that is 
fat. Small changes can be detected 
so improvements can be assessed 
over time.

AnnuAl RepoRt 2014 

5

Year in review 2014Clinical Applications for HepaFat-Scan®

HepaFat-Scan® may be used in both adults and paediatrics in a variety of clinical setting where a definitive measurement of liver 
fat is required. These may include the following:

   A definitive fatty liver  

disease diagnosis and  
for patient education  
and counselling.

   Screening for the suitability 

   To monitor a patient 

of living donors for liver 
transplants. HepaFat-Scan®  
may assist in determining the 
viability of the liver without 
using liver biopsy.

undergoing an intervention 
program (e.g. weight loss 
program).

  Liver fat analysis on  
patients already being  
screened or monitored for  
liver fibrosis or cirrhosis. 

  Monitoring intervention 
programs such as pre  
and post-operative  
bariatric surgery.

   Monitor patients at risk of 
developing diabetes as 
improvements in NAFLD have 
been found to directly reduce 
the development of diabetes.

   Liver surgery planning  

   To screen patients  

as high levels of liver fat  
can have a detrimental  
outcome on surgery. 

prior to prescribing known 
hepatotoxic medications.

   Monitor patients at risk  

of cardiovascular disease. 
NAFLD is the leading risk  
factor for CVD.

Pharmaceutical  
Therapies for NAFLD

Whilst there are currently no FDA 
approved drugs for NAFLD there are 
several drug candidates being studied 
to address this growing epidemic. 
HepaFat-Scan® provides a safe, 
accurate, readily available alternative to 
diagnose patients with fatty liver disease 
and to assess the outcome of patients 
in clinical trials. Resonance Health has 
extensive experience in providing image 
services in multicentre clinical trials and 
is ISO 13485 quality certified.

Once new therapies come to  
market to treat fatty liver disease,  
HepaFat-Scan® will provide a non-
invasive, safe alternative to diagnose 
patients and monitor their outcomes.

in the pipeline – liver 
fibrosis Diagnostic tool

The development of an MRI based 
method to assess liver fibrosis continues 
to be part of the company’s strategic 
focus on developing diagnostic products 

to address liver disease. The current 
gold standard diagnostic tool for liver 
fibrosis is a liver biopsy. Our goal is 
to develop an accurate non-invasive 
solution to diagnose and grade liver 
fibrosis that would provide patients with a 
significantly better option for their disease 
management that is currently available. 

Positive progress was made towards 
the development of a liver fibrosis 
diagnostic tool and collaborations with 
research partners are providing further 
advances towards this goal.

How the HepaFat-Scan® Service Works 

Following a 2-3 minute scan, patient image data are transmitted electronically to Resonance Health’s 
central image analysis facility over a secure network. The HepaFat-Scan® analysis process is applied 
to provide the volume % of fat in tissue.

MRI images 
transmitted 
securely to 
Resonance Health 
Analysis Centre

HepaFat-Scan® liver fat 
concentration report available for 
secure download within target 
time of 48 hours

Patient scanned at MRI Centre

HepaFat-Scan® analysis process 
applied to images received

6 

ResonAnce heAlth limited

HepaFat-ScanTM Report 

Report #:   
1400001 
Patient ID:  
C123456 
Patient name:   C123456 (de-identified) 
Birth date: 

20 Jan 1998 

Scan date: 
07 August 2014 
Analysis date:  20 August 2014 
Referrer: 
MRI Centre: 

Dr Doctor 
MRI Central 

Volume fraction of fat in liver:  9.6% 

The outline represents the liver region used for the HepaFat-Scan analysis. 

Authorised by: Service Centre Manager 

Resonance Health Analysis Services Pty Ltd                          www.resonancehealth.com 

 0805                  ARTG : 223853           510(k): K122035                         

Year in review 2014 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The Directors present their report on the consolidated entity, consisting of Resonance Health Limited and the 
entities it controlled, together with the annual financial report for the financial year ended 30 June 2014. In order 
to comply with the provisions of the Corporations Act 2001, the directors report as follows:

Directors

The names, qualifications and experience of directors in office during the financial year and until the date of this report are as 
follows. Directors were in office for this entire period unless otherwise stated.

Dr Martin Blake
MBBS,FRANZCR,
FAANMS, MBA, GAICD

Ms Liza Dunne
B.Bus, GDipAppFin,
GAICD

Mr Simon Panton

Position: 
Chairman — Independent and Non-
Executive (appointed as Director 4 
October 2007 and as Chairman 16 
December 2010)

Experience: 
Dr Blake is a Radiologist and Nuclear 
Physician and brings significant 
technical and industry experience 
to Resonance Health. Dr Blake 
received FAANMS as a post nominal 
in recognition of his Nuclear Medicine 
Specialist training undertaken in 1994 
& 1995.

He has been a Partner of Perth 
Radiological Clinic since 1997  
and is currently the Chairman  
of that Company.

Dr Blake has an MBA from Melbourne 
University, is a Graduate of the Australian 
Institute of Company Directors and 
holds directorships on a number of 
private Company boards.

Other current directorships: 
None

Former directorships in last 3 years: 
None

Special responsibilities:  
Chairman of the Audit Committee
Chairman of the Remuneration 
Committee

Position: 
Managing Director — Executive 
(appointed 23 October 2008)

Position:  
Director — Non-Executive  
(appointed 5 October 2009)

Experience: Mr Panton has been 
a strong supporter of the Company 
and the FerriScan® technology over 
a number of years and is a major 
shareholder of Resonance Health. 
Mr Panton brings skills in business 
and marketing having run his own 
successful business.

Other current directorships:  
None

Former directorships in last 3 years: 
None

Special responsibilities:
Member of the Audit Committee
Member of the Remuneration Committee

Experience: 
Ms Dunne joined Resonance Health 
in October 2003 and has been 
actively involved in all aspects of 
the business including business 
development, commercialisation of 
FerriScan®, developing alliances with 
pharmaceutical industry partners and 
obtaining regulatory approval in various 
countries.

Ms Dunne has in depth experience 
in senior positions across industry. 
She worked for IBM for eleven 
years in financial, marketing and 
management positions and spent five 
years with KPMG Consulting working 
across a broad spectrum of industry 
and project areas that focused on 
improved business processes and 
implementation of new technology.

Ms Dunne holds a Business Degree,  
a Graduate Diploma in Applied 
Finance and is a Graduate of the 
Australian Institute of Company 
Directors.

Other current directorships:  
None

Former directorships in last 3 years: 
None

AnnuAl RepoRt 2014 

7

DIRECTORS’ REPORT 
Dr Timothy St Pierre
B.Sc(Hons), PhD

Dr Jason Loveridge
B.Sc, PhD, FRSM

Mrs Naomi Haydari
B.Bus, B SSc, CPA

Position:  
Director — Executive  
(appointed 21 August 2006)

Position: 
Director — Non-Executive  
(appointed 7 February 2013)

Experience: 
Dr St Pierre is widely published in the 
field of iron in medicine and biology 
and has a reputation as a key opinion 
leader in the understanding of the 
fundamental properties of the iron 
deposits that occur in iron overload 
diseases. Dr St Pierre, a Professor at 
The University of Western Australia, 
led the team which developed the 
FerriScan® technology. Dr St Pierre 
has strong links with international 
key opinion leaders in the field of 
iron overload diseases and regularly 
participates in international research 
collaborations. Dr St Pierre won 
a Clunies Ross Award from the 
Australian Academy of Technological 
Sciences and Engineering for his work 
on non-invasive measurement of tissue 
iron deposits.

Experience: 
Dr. Loveridge FRSM has a Ph.D. in 
Biochemistry, a B.Sc. in Biochemistry  
and Microbiology (Class II/I Honours)  
and is a Fellow Royal Society of Medicine.

Dr. Loveridge has been working with 
young, growth orientated businesses 
in the biotech and medtech industries 
for over 20 years. As an active venture 
investor he established a lengthy track 
record of successful participation 
in European, US and Israeli based 
healthcare companies. Based in 
Europe he also has considerable 
international experience at board level 
and a particular interest in business 
development, mergers & acquisitions.

Other current directorships:
None

Other current directorships: 
None

Former directorships in last 3 years: 
None

Former directorships in last 3 years: 
None

Special responsibilities: 
None

Special responsibilities:
Member of the Audit Committee
Member of the Remuneration 
Committee

Position: 
Company Secretary (on maternity leave)

Experience: 
Mrs Haydari has experience in 
managing the financial obligations 
of ASX listed corporations across a 
diverse range of industries.

Mrs Haydari holds a Business Degree 
(Accounting), a Social Science Degree 
and is a qualified CPA.

Mrs Haydari commenced maternity 
leave effective 28th November 2013.

Mr Adrian Bowers
B.Bus, CPA,
Chartered Secretary

Position: 
Company Secretary acting while Mrs 
Haydari is on maternity leave.

Experience: 
Mr Bowers has experience in 
managing the financial affairs of public 
corporations across a diverse range of 
industries.

Mr Bowers holds a Bachelor of 
Business, is a CPA and qualified 
Chartered Secretary.

8 

ResonAnce heAlth limited

DIRECTORS’ REPORTinterests in the shares  
of the company

The following relevant interests in 
shares of the Company were held by 
the directors during the period. There 
has been no change in directors’ and 
executives’ shareholdings to the date of 
this report.

Number of fully paid ordinary shares

6,464,677

3,253,385

65,960,972

-

9,078,750

84,757,784

Directors

Dr M Blake

Ms L Dunne

Mr S Panton

Dr J Loveridge

Dr T St Pierre

Total

Executives

Mrs N Haydari

Total

incentive shares  
and options

review of 
operations

FerriScan®:

FerriScan® is a patent protected 
software medical device used to 
assess the amount of iron in the 
liver through the analysis of MRI 
images. The FerriScan® software is 
used at the Company’s ISO 13485 
certified central facility to provide an 
image analysis and reporting service 
to hospitals and pharmaceutical 
companies around the world. We 
are currently providing FerriScan® 
analysis and reporting services to 
clients in over 20 countries and in 
the last 12 months we have seen 
considerable growth in the number of 
FerriScan® clients.

-

-

During the year sales volumes 
increased 32% over the previous 
financial year and over 50 new 
radiology facilities were set up for 
FerriScan® imaging. Collaborative 
programs with pharmaceutical 
companies have expanded the 
availability of the FerriScan® services to 
new markets.

The Company does not have an option 
plan. Accordingly, no options were 
issued as part of remuneration to 
directors or specified executives during 
the current or previous financial year.

Dividends paid  
or recommended

No dividend was paid or declared for 
the financial year.

principal activities

The Company’s business involves the 
development and commercialisation 
of technologies and services for the 
quantitative analysis of radiological 
images in a regulated and quality 
controlled environment. 

The Company’s core product is 
FerriScan®, a non-invasive liver diagnostic 
technology used for the measurement of 
iron in the liver.

Sales revenue for the year ended 
30 June 2014 was $2,284,565 
representing an increase of 50% from 
the previous year’s sales revenue of 
$1,527,188. The Company completed 
a record number of 5,596 FerriScan® 
images up 32% from prior year’s 4,247 
images. Pre-paid revenue received 
in the prior year of $313,805 was 
earned for accounting purposes and 
recognised as revenue during the 
current year.

Receipts from customers were 
$2,179,241 up 17% from the previous 
year’s receipts.

Variations in volume growth and revenue 
growth are the result of changes in the 
mix of services provided. Contracts 
with pharmaceutical companies 
include project management and data 
management services in addition to 
the FerriScan® analysis and reporting 
services. Growth in the routine use of 
FerriScan® by hospitals does not include 
these additional project related services.

HepaFat-Scan®:

HepaFat-Scan® is a software medical 
device for the measurement of fat in 
the liver addressing the rapidly growing 
fatty liver market. HepaFat-Scan® 
was cleared for marketing by the US 
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 
in December 2013 and was listed on 
the Australian Register of Therapeutic 
Goods (ARTG) and gained the CE 
Mark(European Community approval) 
in May 2014 for marketing approval in 
Europe. Commercialisation activities 
have focused on the following activities:

Completion of a US market access 
report which has expanded the 
potential markets for HepaFat-Scan® 
and is directing our initial target 
marketing activities.

Engaging with the Company’s existing 
customer base to use HepaFat-Scan® 
for patients with fatty liver related 
disorders. Several customers are now 
piloting HepaFat-Scan® in the US and 
Australia.

Engaging with pharmaceutical 
companies developing therapies 
to address fatty liver disease. The 
Company’s ISO 13485 certified core 
lab is ideally suited to provide services 
for pharmaceutical companies 
conducting clinical trials where a 
determination of the amount of fat in 
the liver is required. Resonance Health 
has been providing services to clinical 
trials for over 10 years.

An agreement has been reached in 
principal with a leading US hospital 
regarding an independent validation 
study of HepaFat-Scan®.

Work has commenced to further 
automate the use of the HepaFat-
Scan® software, enabling scale up 
for large volume use. Many countries 
in Asia are now experiencing a 
rapidly growing prevalence of fatty 
liver disease and the Company is 
developing a solution to provide a  
low cost option to these markets.

Liver Fibrosis:

Resonance Health is also developing 
imaging tools for the quantification of 

AnnuAl RepoRt 2014 

9

DIRECTORS’ REPORTliver fibrosis using MRI technology. 
A noninvasive alternative to a liver 
biopsy to assess the degree of liver 
fibrosis is a large unmet need.

The Company has conducted a 
number of studies which have  
shown some promising results.  
The most recent work has focused 
on the assessment of contrast-
enhanced images to detect subtle 
features within the images which 
distinguish fibrosis. Whilst this work 
has not been finalised, to date it has 
not provided results which are better 
than those previously obtained. Using 
non-contrast enhanced images, the 
Company’s technology accurately 
scored the level of liver fibrosis in 
90% of the 29 cases. However, 
when tested with a separate set 
of images, the same results could 
not be achieved. The Company is 
undertaking further investigation 
into understanding the less than 
satisfactory results on the  
second measurements.

While the Company’s liver fibrosis 
product is not currently at a position 
to be commercialised, the results 
are encouraging and the Company is 
still pursuing its objectives in regard 
to the development of a unique and 
novel MRI test to accurately assess 
the degree of liver fibrosis.

financial summary

A net loss was recorded for the year 
of $72,415 compared to a net loss of 
$204,481 in the previous financial year. 
Sales revenue was $2,284,565, an 
increase of 50% over the prior year due 
to an increase in the volume of work. 
Total income was 35% higher than 
the prior year. The Company received 
no Export Market Development Grant 
(EMDG) in the FY 2013/14 compared to 
$146,051 received in the previous year. 
The FerriScan® and Services Business 
Segment reported a profit of $661,665 
compared to a profit of $70,641 in  
the previous financial year, an increase 
of 836%. 

Normal operating expenses (excluding 
depreciation, amortisation, foreign 
exchange expense and due diligence 

onetime costs) were 3% lower than the 
prior year. Total expenditure for the year 
was $2,384,818 compared to the prior 
year total expenditure of $2,070,539 for 
the following reasons:

Year on Year difference

the Statement of Financial Position and 
expenditure of $89,326 (2013: $34,677) 
and amortisation expense, $70,874 
(2013: $56,212) recognised in Research 
and Development in the Statement 
of Comprehensive Income and 
$25,804 (2013: $46,821) recognised in 
Employee Benefits.

($54,649)

Operating Results

Amortisation charges 
are higher $89,326 
(2013: $34,677) 

Foreign exchange 
expense of $53,879 
compared to prior year 
foreign exchange gain 
of $156,584

Onetime charge for 
due diligence cost of 
$119,573

Other Items

Total

($210,463)

($119,573)

$70,406

($314,279)

The loss for the year also reflects a 
reduced income tax benefit of $3,367 
compared to $156,911 in the previous 
financial year as the Group moves into 
a tax paying position.

Resonance Health has cash at bank of 
$2,097,607 at the end of the financial 
year compared to $1,092,943 in the 
previous financial year and has no debt.

Cash flows from operating activities 
generated positive cash of $64,239. This 
excludes cash expenditure of $94,629 
associated with the due diligence of a 
potential acquisition target.

No Research and Development Tax 
Rebate was received in the FY 2013/14 
year compared to $188,645 received in 
the FY 2012/13. A rebate of $115,949 
has been recorded as part of other 
receivables at balance date.

The Company raised $1,277,521 (less 
costs) via the issue of 25,550,419 
million shares at 5 cents per share.

Research and development 
expenditure focused on the Company’s 
HepaFat-Scan® and fibrosis products 
totalled $376,409 during the year 
(2013: $343,047). This comprised 
capitalised development costs of 
$190,404 (2013: $205,337) that are 
recognised as an intangible asset in 

The net loss of the consolidated entity 
for the financial year after tax was 
$72,415 (2013: $204,481).

Significant Changes in State of Affairs

There were no significant changes in 
the state of affairs of the Company 
during the financial year, other than as 
set out in this report.

Significant Events After  
Balance Date

On 12 September 2014 as part of the 
Shortfall Entitlement, the Company 
placed 13 million shares at $0.05 
per share. This raised a further cash 
amount of $650,000.

Likely Developments and Expected 
Results of Operations

Comments on expected results of the 
operations of the consolidated entity are 
included in this report under the review 
of operations.

Disclosure of information regarding 
likely developments in the operations 
of the consolidated entity in future 
financial years and the expected 
results of those operations is likely to 
result in unreasonable prejudice to the 
Company. Accordingly, this information 
has not been disclosed in this report.

Environmental Legislation

The consolidated entity’s operations 
are not subject to any significant 
environmental legislation.

Indemnification and Insurance of 
Directors and Officers

The Company has agreed to indemnify 
all the directors and secretaries of the 
Company for any liabilities to another 

10 

ResonAnce heAlth limited

DIRECTORS’ REPORTperson (other than the Company or 
related body corporate) that may arise 
from their position as directors of the 
Company and its controlled entities, 
except where the liability arises out of 
conduct involving a lack of good faith. 

During the financial year the Company 
paid a premium of $13,000 (2013: 
$13,000) to insure the directors and 
secretaries of the Company and 
its controlled entities against any 
liability incurred in the course of their 
duties to the extent permitted by 
the Corporations Act 2001. It is not 
possible to apportion the premium 
between amounts relating to the 
insurance against legal costs and those 
relating to other liabilities.

remuneration report 
(auDiteD)

This report outlines the remuneration 
arrangements in place for the key 
management personnel of Resonance 
Health Limited for the financial year 
ended 30 June 2014. The information 
provided in this remuneration report has 
been audited as required by Section 
308 (3C) of the Corporations Act 2001.

Key management personnel are 
defined as those persons having 
authority and responsibility for 
planning, directing and controlling the 
major activities of the Company and the 
Group, directly or indirectly, including 
any director (whether executive or 
otherwise) of the parent Company and 
the Company Secretary.

Key Management Personnel

 (i) Directors

  Dr Martin Blake – Chairman
  Ms Liza Dunne – Managing Director
  Mr Simon Panton
  Dr Timothy St Pierre
  Dr Jason Loveridge

(ii) executives

 Mrs Naomi Haydari - Company 
Secretary (on Maternity Leave)

Remuneration Policy

The Board’s policy for determining the 
nature and amount of remuneration for 

Board members and senior executives 
of the consolidated entity is as follows:
•	

set competitive remuneration 

packages to attract the highest 

calibre of employees in the 

context of prevai ling market 
conditions, particular experience 
of the individual concerned and 
the overall performance of the 
Company; and

•	

reward employees for performance 
that results in long-term growth 
in shareholder wealth, with the 
objective of ensuring maximum 
stakeholder benefit from the 
retention of a high quality board 
and executive team.

The Board of Resonance Health 
Limited believes the remuneration 
policy to be appropriate and effective in 
its ability to attract and retain the best 
executives and directors to run and 
manage the consolidated entity, as well 
as create goal congruence between 
directors, executives and shareholders.

Remuneration Committee

Non-executive Director 
Remuneration

The Board seeks to set aggregate 
remuneration at a level that provides 
the Company with the ability to attract 
and retain directors of the highest 
calibre, whilst incurring a cost that is 
acceptable to shareholders.

Non-executive directors’ fees not 
exceeding an aggregate of $250,000 
per annum have been approved by the 
Company in a general meeting.

The amount of aggregate remuneration 
sought to be approved by shareholders 
and the manner in which it is 
apportioned amongst directors is 
reviewed annually. The Board considers 
fees paid to non-executive directors 
of comparable companies when 
undertaking the annual review process.

Each of the non-executive directors 
receives a fixed fee for their services 
as directors. There is no direct link 
between remuneration paid to any of the 
directors and corporate performance.

The Remuneration Committee of the 
Board of Directors of the Company 
is responsible for determining and 
reviewing compensation arrangements 
for directors and the executive team.

Executive Remuneration

Remuneration consists of fixed 
remuneration and variable 
remuneration.

The remuneration policy, setting the 
terms and conditions for the executive 
directors and other senior executives, 
was developed by the remuneration 
committee and approved by the Board.

The remuneration committee  
reviews executive packages  
annually by reference to the 
consolidated entity’s performance, 
executive performance and 
comparable information from  
industry sectors and other listed 
companies in similar industries. The 
assistance of an external consultant 
or remuneration surveys are used  
where necessary.

Remuneration Structure

In accordance with best practice 
Corporate Governance, the structure  
of non-executive director and  
executive remuneration is separate  
and distinct.

 (i) fixed remuneration

 Fixed remuneration is reviewed 
annually. The process consists of 
a review of relevant comparative 
remuneration in the market and 
internally, and where appropriate, 
external advice on policies and 
practices. The Committee has 
access to external, independent 
advice where necessary.

 All executives (except Dr St Pierre) 
receive a base salary (which  
is based on factors such as  
length of service and  
experience), superannuation  
and fringe benefits.

 Executives receive a 
superannuation guarantee 
contribution required by the 
government, which for the year  
is 9.25%, and do not receive any 
other retirement benefits.

AnnuAl RepoRt 2014 

11

DIRECTORS’ REPORT 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(ii) variable remuneration

 All bonuses and incentives 
are linked to predetermined 
performance criteria. The Board 
may, however, exercise its discretion 
in relation to approving incentives 
and bonuses, and can recommend 
changes to the committee’s 
recommendations. Any changes 
must be justified by reference to 
measurable performance criteria.

 All remuneration paid to directors 
and executives is valued at the cost 
to the Company and expensed 
or capitalised. Securities given to 
directors and executives are valued 
as the difference between the 
market price of those shares and 
the amount paid by the director or 
executive. There are currently no 
securities on issue.

Executive Officer’s Employment 
Agreements
Ms Dunne was appointed to the role 
of Managing Director of Resonance 
Health Ltd on 23 October 2008. Her 
employment agreement provides for 
a salary of $272,500 pa inclusive of 
superannuation and the provision of 
three months notice for termination or 
resignation without cause.

Mrs Haydari was appointed to the role 
of Company Secretary of Resonance 
Health Ltd on 19 March 2012. Mrs 
Haydari resigned as Company 
Secretary on 28 November 2013 to 
take 12 months maternity leave. Her 
employment agreement provides for an 
equivalent full time salary of $136,250 
pa inclusive of superannuation for 22.5 
hours per week and the provision of 
one months notice for termination or 
resignation without cause.

Consultancy Services Agreement for 
Executive Director Dr Tim St Pierre

The Company has an agreement with 
The University of Western Australia (UWA) 
for consulting services provided by Dr St 
Pierre. Under this agreement consulting 
services provided for duties of Chief 
Scientific Officer totalling $67,119 (2013: 
$94,544) and no fixed fee for his services 
as a non-executive director (2013: $nil) 
were incurred during the financial year. 
These amounts are included in Dr Tim 
St Pierre’s remuneration disclosed in the 
following table.

Details of remuneration for year enDeD 30 June 2014

The remuneration for key management personnel of the consolidated entity during the year was as follows:

Short-term
Employee 
Benefits

Post 
Employment
Benefits

Equity

Total

Salary &
Fees
$

Superannuation
Contributions
$

Shares/
Options
$

$

Performance
Related
%

Non-Executive Directors’ remuneration

Dr M Blake

Mr S Panton

Dr J Loveridge

Total

Executive Directors’ remuneration

Ms L Dunne

Dr T St Pierre1

Total

Executive Directors’ remuneration

Mrs N Haydari2

Total

54,920

27,460

45,000

127,380

250,000

67,119

317,119

59,411

59,411

5,080

2,540

-

7,620

23,125

-

23,125

4,460

4,460

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

60,000

30,000

45,000

135,000

273,125

67,119

340,244

63,871

63,871

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1  Dr St Pierre’s remuneration represents director’s fees earned during the financial year and consulting fees for duties as Chief 
Scientific Officer paid to The University of Western Australia in full.

2 Mrs Naomi Haydari commenced maternity leave effective 28th November 2013.

12 

ResonAnce heAlth limited

DIRECTORS’ REPORT 
 
 
Details of remuneration for year enDeD 30 June 2013

The remuneration for key management personnel of the consolidated entity during the year was as follows:

Short-term
Employee 
Benefits

Post 
Employment
Benefits

Equity

Total

Salary &
Fees
$

Superannuation
Contributions
$

Shares/
Options
$

$

Performance
Related
%

Non-Executive Directors’ remuneration

Dr M Blake

Mr S Panton

Total

Executive Directors’ remuneration

Ms L Dunne

Dr T St Pierre1

Total

Executive Directors’ remuneration

Mrs N Haydari

Total

55,046

33,639

12,500

101,185

250,000

94,544

344,544

75,000

75,000

4,954

3,028

-

7,982

22,500

-

22,500

6,750

6,750

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

60,000

36,667

12,500

109,167

272,500

94,544

367,044

81,750

81,750

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1   Dr St Pierre’s remuneration represents director’s fees earned during the financial year and consulting fees for duties as Chief 
Scientific Officer paid to The University of Western Australia in full.

Shareholdings of key management personnel

The numbers of ordinary shares in the Company held during the financial year by key management personnel of the consolidated 
Group including their personally related entities are set out below.

Balance
1/7/2013

Received as
Remuneration

Net Change
Other*

Received during
the year on
exercise of options

Balance
30/6/2014

Directors

Dr M Blake

Ms L Dunne

Dr T St Pierre

Dr J Loveridge

6,224,677

3,153,385

9,078,750

-

Mr S Panton

65,960,972

Total

84,417,784

-

-

-

240,000

100,000

-

-

-

340,000

-

-

-

-

-

-

6,464,677

3,253,385

9,078,750

-

65,960,972

84,757,784

AnnuAl RepoRt 2014 

13

DIRECTORS’ REPORTShareholdings of key management personnel

The numbers of ordinary shares in the Company held during the financial year by key management personnel of the consolidated 
Group including their personally related entities are set out below.

Balance
1/7/2013

Received as
Remuneration

Net Change
Other*

Received during
the year on
exercise of 
options

Balance
30/6/2014

Executives

Mrs N Haydari

Total

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Key management personnel options and rights holdings

No options or rights are held by any member of KMP.

There were no other transactions with KMP’s during the year.

End of Remuneration Report

14 

ResonAnce heAlth limited

DIRECTORS’ REPORTMeetings of Directors

The number of meetings of the Company’s Board of directors and each Board committee held during the year ended 30 June 
2014, and the numbers of meetings attended by each director were:

Directors Meetings

Audit Committee Meetings

Remuneration Committee
Meetings

Number 
eligible
to attend

Number
attended

Number 
eligible
to attend

Number
attended

Number
eligible
to attend

Number
attended

Dr M Blake

Ms L Dunne

Mr S Panton

Dr T St Pierre

Dr J Loveridge

10

10

10

10

10

Corporate Governance

10

10

10

8

10

2

-

2

-

2

2

-

2

-

2

2

-

2

-

2

2

-

2

-

2

In recognising the need for the highest 
standards  of  corporate  behaviour 
and  accountability,  the  directors  of 
Resonance Health Limited support and 
adhere  to  the  principles  of  corporate 
governance. The Company’s corporate 
governance  statement 
is  contained 
in  the  following  section  of  this  annual 
report.

Proceedings on Behalf of Company

No  person  has  applied  for  leave  of 
Court  to  bring  proceedings  on  behalf 
of  the  Company  or  intervene  in  any 
proceedings  to  which  the  Company 
is  a  party  for  the  purpose  of  taking 
responsibility on behalf of the Company 
for all or any part of those proceedings. 
The  Company  was  not  a  party  to  any 
such proceedings during the year.

provided during the year by the auditor 
are  outlined  in  Note  22  to  the  financial 
statements.  The  directors  are  satisfied 
that the provision of non-audit services 
is compatible with the general standard 
of  independence  for  auditors  imposed 
by the Corporations Act 2001.

The  directors  are  of  the  opinion  that 
the  services  do  not  compromise  the 
auditor’s 
independence  as  all  non-
audit  services  have  been  reviewed  to 
ensure  that  they  do  not  impact  the 
integrity  and  objectivity  of  the  auditor 
and  none  of  the  services  undermine 
the general principles relating to auditor 
independence  as  set  out  in  Code  of 
Conduct  APES  110  Code  of  Ethics  for 
Professional  Accountants 
issued  by 
the  Accounting  Professional  &  Ethical 
Standards Board. 

Auditor  Independence  and  Non-
audit Services

This report is made in accordance with 
a resolution of the Board of Directors.

Section  307C  of 
the  Corporations 
Act  2001  requires  our  auditors,  HLB 
Mann Judd, to provide the directors of 
the  Company  with  an  Independence  
Declaration  in  relation  to  the  audit  of 
the  annual  report.  This  Independence 
Declaration  is  set  out  on  page  20  and 
forms  part  of  this  Directors’  Report  for 
the year ended 30 June 2014.

Non-audit Services

Details  of  amounts  paid  or  payable 
to  the  auditor  for  non-audit  services  

Dr Martin Blake
Chairman

Perth, Western Australia
Dated this 26 September 2014

AnnuAl RepoRt 2014 

15

DIRECTORS’ REPORTResonance Health Limited is committed to protecting and enhancing shareholder value and adopting best practice governance 
policies and practices. This Corporate Governance Statement outlines the main Corporate Governance practices that were 
in place throughout the financial year, which comply with the Australian Securities Exchange (‘ASX’) Corporate Governance 
Council published guidelines as well as its corporate governance principles and recommendations unless otherwise stated. 
Where a recommendation has not been followed, this is clearly stated along with an explanation for the departure.

principle 1

Lay solid foundations for management and oversight

The Board is the governing body of the Company. The Board and the Company act within a statutory framework – principally 
the Corporations Act and also the Constitution of the Company. Subject to this statutory framework, the Board has the authority 
and the responsibility to perform the functions, determine the policies and control the affairs of Resonance Health Limited.

The Board must ensure that Resonance Health Limited acts in accordance with prudent commercial principles, and satisfies 
shareholders – consistent with maximising the Company’s long term value.

The Company has established the functions reserved to the Board. The Board Charter summarises the role, responsibilities, 
policies and processes of the Board of Resonance Health Limited and comments on the Board’s approach to corporate 
governance.

The primary responsibilities of the Board include:

•	 Charting the direction, strategies and financial objectives of the Company and ensuring appropriate resources are available
•	 Monitoring the implementation of those policies and strategies and the achievement of those financial objectives
•	 Monitoring compliance with control and accountability systems, regulatory requirements and ethical standards
•	 Ensuring the preparation of accurate financial reports and statements
•	 Reporting to shareholders and the investment community on the performance and state of the Company
•	 Appointing and monitoring the performance of senior executives
•	 Establishing proper succession plans for management of the Company

The  Company  has  established  the  functions  delegated  to  senior  executives.  The  Board  Charter  summarises  the  role  and 
responsibilities of the Managing Director and the Company Secretary.

The  Board  delegates  responsibility  for  day  to  day  management  of  the  Company  to  the  Managing  Director.  However,  the 
Managing Director must consult the Board on matters that are sensitive, extraordinary or of a strategic nature. The Company 
Secretary supports the effectiveness of the Board.

Separate functions of the Board and management existed and were practised throughout the year.

ASX Corporate Governance Council Principle 1 recommendation 1.2 requires companies to disclose the process for evaluating 
the performance of senior executives.

The performance of executives is measured against criteria agreed annually with each executive and is based predominantly 
on the achievement of agreed milestones.

Details of matters reserved to the Board and delegated to senior executives are outlined in the Board Charter. A copy of the 
Board Charter is publically available on the Company’s website.

The Board complied with the ASX Corporate Governance Council Principle 1 at all times during the year except as noted above.

16 

ResonAnce heAlth limited

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENTprinciple 2

Structure the Board to add value

The composition of the Board has been determined on the basis of providing the Company with the benefit of a broad range of 
technical, commercial and financial skills, combined with an appropriate level of experience at a senior corporate level. Details 
of each Director’s skills and experience are set out in the Directors’ report.

The ASX guidelines recommend that a listed Company should have a majority of Directors who are independent. The Board did 
not comply with the ASX Corporate Governance Council Principle 2 Recommendation 2.1 throughout the year. The Board did not 
have a majority of independent Directors at all times during the financial year. 

A Director is considered independent when the Director does not have any relationship with the Company that would be considered 
to affect the independent status as outlined in the ASX Corporate Governance Council Principle 2 Recommendation 2.1.

In the context of director independence, ‘materiality’ is considered from both the Company and individual director perspective. 
The  determination  of  materiality  requires  consideration  of  both  quantitative  and  qualitative  elements.  An  item  is  presumed 
to  be  quantitatively  immaterial  if  it  is  equal  or  less  than  5%  of  the  appropriate  base  amount.  It  is  presumed  to  be  material 
(unless there is evidence to the contrary) if it is equal or greater than 10% of the appropriate base amount. Qualitative factors 
considered include whether a relationship is strategically important, the competitive landscape, the nature of the relationship 
and the contractual or other arrangements governing it and other factors which point at the actual ability in question to shape 
the direction of the Company’s loyalty.

Directors during the financial year were:

•	 Dr Martin Blake – Independent – Chairman
•	 Ms Liza Dunne – Executive – Not independent – Managing Director
•	 Mr Simon Panton – Not independent – substantial shareholder
•	 Dr Tim St Pierre – Executive – Not independent – Chief Scientific Officer
•	 Dr Jason Loveridge - Independent- Non-executive Director

A description of the skills and experience of each director and their period of office is disclosed in the Directors’ Report. The ASX 
Corporate  Governance  Council  Principle  2  Recommendation  2.2  recommends  that  the  Chairman  should  be  an  independent 
director. The role of Chairman was performed by an independent director at all times during the financial year. The ASX Corporate 
Governance  Council  Principle  2  Recommendation  2.3  recommends  that  the  roles  of  Chairman  and  Managing  Director  be 
exercised by different individuals. The Company complied with this recommendation at all times during the financial year.

The roles of Chairman and Managing Director are exercised by different individuals, providing for clear division of responsibility 
at  the  head  of  the  Company.  Their  roles  and  responsibilities,  and  the  division  of  responsibilities  between  them,  are  clearly 
understood and there is regular communication between them.

Directors  are  subject  to  re-election  by  rotation  at  annual  general  meetings  as  stipulated  in  the  Corporations  Act  and  the 
Company’s Constitution. There is no maximum term for non-executive director appointments. Newly elected Directors must 
seek re-election at the first general meeting of shareholders following their appointment.

The remuneration of the Directors is determined by the Nomination and Remuneration Committee. Further information and the 
components of remuneration for Directors are set out in the Directors’ Report.

ASX Corporate Governance Council Principle 2.4 recommends that the Nomination Committee should consist of a majority of 
independent Directors, be chaired by an independent Director and have at least three members.

The members of the Nomination and Remuneration Committee during the financial year were:

•	 Dr Martin Blake – (Chairman) – Independent
•	 Mr Simon Panton – Not Independent
•	 Dr Jason Loveridge-Independent
Nomination and Remuneration Committee consists of three Non-executive Directors.

The  number  of  meetings  attended  by  each  member  of  the  Nomination  and  Remuneration  Committee  are  detailed  in  the 
Directors’ Report.

AnnuAl RepoRt 2014 

17

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENTASX Corporate Governance Council Principle 2.5 recommends that the performance of the Board should be reviewed regularly 
against appropriate measures. The Company does not have a formal process for evaluating the performance of the Board, 
its Committees or individual Directors. Accordingly, there was no formal evaluation of the Board, its Committees or individuals 
Directors during the reporting period.

The Company has a procedure in place for Directors to take independent professional advice at the expense of the Company.

Prior to the appointment of a new director, the Nomination and Remuneration Committee assesses the skills represented on the 
Board by the non-executive Directors and determines whether those skills meet the skills identified as required. The Committee 
will then implement a process to identify suitable candidates for appointment. The Committee makes recommendations to the 
Board on candidates it considers appropriate for appointment. Induction procedures are in place to ensure new Directors are 
able to participate fully and actively in Board decision-making at the earliest opportunity. Directors are encouraged to engage 
in  continuing  education  and  are  encouraged  to  update  and  enhance  their  skills  and  knowledge.  Directors  meet  regularly 
to discuss the performance of the Company and to attend to regulatory requirements. The Company Secretary distributes 
information before each Board meeting to enable Directors to discharge their duties effectively.

The Company’s Constitution requires a director of the Company to not hold office without re-election past the third annual 
general meeting following the director’s appointment or three years, whichever is longer. The Company discloses its Nomination 
and Remuneration Committee Charter on the Company’s website. The Board complied with the ASX Corporate Governance 
Council Principle 2 at all times during the year except as noted above.

principle 3

Promote ethical and responsible decision-making

The Board places great emphasis on ethics and integrity in all its business dealings.

In regards to Principle 3.1 the Board considers the business practices and ethics exercised by individual Board members and 
key executives to be of the highest standards.

The Company has a code of conduct as to the:

•	
•	
•	

practices necessary to maintain confidence in the Company’s integrity;

practices necessary to take into account their legal obligations and the expectations of shareholders; and

responsibility and accountability of individuals for reporting and investigating reports of unethical practices.

These practices are outlined in the Company’s Board Charter, Communication Policy, Continuous Disclosure Charter, Share 
Trading Policy, Audit and Risk Charter and Nomination and Remuneration Charter. These documents are disclosed on the 
Company’s website.

Trading in the Company’s shares

The  Company’s  policy  restricts  Directors  and  employees  from  acting  on  material  information  until  it  has  been  released  to 
the  market  and  adequate  time  has  been  given  for  this  to  be  reflected  in  the  securities’  prices.  Statutory  provisions  of  the 
Corporations Act dealing with insider trading have been strictly complied with.

The Company’s Share Trading Policy is disclosed on the Company’s website.

Diversity Policy

The Board currently does not have a Diversity Policy. Gender Diversity is demonstrated within the Company as follows:

Resonance Health currently has one female member of a five member board. The Managing Director, CFO/Company Secretary 
(on Maternity Leave) and two Managers of the Company are women.

Currently, Resonance Health has women who hold 20% of total Board membership. Additionally 32% of all current employees 
are women and 26% of all Management/Executive roles are filled by women.

The Board currently has no measurable objectives on achieving greater gender diversity within the Company.

The Board complied with the ASX Corporate Governance Council Principle 3 Recommendations at all times during the year.

18 

ResonAnce heAlth limited

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENTprinciple 4

Safeguard integrity in financial reporting

The Board has established an Audit and Risk Committee that operates in accordance with the Company’s Audit and Risk 
Charter.  It  is  the  Board’s  responsibility  to  ensure  that  an  effective  internal  control  framework  exists  within  the  entity.  This 
includes internal controls to deal with both the effectiveness and efficiency of significant business processes, including the 
safeguarding of assets, the maintenance of proper accounting records, and the reliability of financial information. The Board has 
delegated responsibility for the establishment and framework of internal controls and ethical standards for the management of 
the consolidated entity to the Audit Committee.

The Committee also provides the Board with additional assurance regarding the reliability of financial information for inclusion 
in the financial reports. All members of the Audit Committee are non-executive Directors.

ASX  Corporate  Governance  Council  Principle  4.2  recommends  that  the  Audit  Committee  should  consist  only  of  non-
executive with a majority of independent Directors, be chaired by an independent director who is not chair of the Board and 
have at least three members.

The members of the Audit and Risk Committee during the financial year were:

•	 Dr Martin Blake (Chairman) - Independent
•	 Mr Simon Panton – Not independent
•	 Dr Jason Loveridge - Independent

The qualifications of each member of the Audit and Risk Committee and the number of meetings attended are detailed in the 
Directors’ Report.

The  Audit  and  Risk  Committee  generally  invites  the  Managing  Director,  Company  Secretary,  and  external  auditors  to 
attend meetings.

The Company discloses its Audit and Risk Committee Charter on the Company’s website.

The Company’s external auditors have a policy for the rotation of audit engagement partners. A new Audit Partner was assigned 
to the Company with effect for the 2014 financial year in line with this policy.

The Board has not complied with the ASX Corporate Governance Council Principle 4 Recommendations at all times during 
the year. The Chairman of the Board is also Chairman of the committee which is not in accordance with Principle 4.2, however 
given the size of the company and the Chair’s Independent status it is reasonable and acceptable.

principle 5

Make timely and balanced disclosure

The Company complies with all disclosure requirements to ensure that Resonance Health manages the disclosure of price 
sensitive  information  effectively  and  in  accordance  with  the  requirements  as  set  out  by  regulatory  bodies.  The  Managing 
Director  and  Company  Secretary  are  authorised  to  communicate  with  shareholders  and  the  market  in  relation  to  Board 
approved disclosures.

The Company has a written policy designed to ensure compliance with ASX Listing Rule disclosures and accountability at 
a senior executive level for that compliance. The details of this policy are outlined in the Company’s Continuous Disclosure 
Charter which is displayed on the Company’s website.

All announcements made to the ASX are placed on the Company’s web site immediately after public release.

The Board complied with the ASX Corporate Governance Council Principle 5 Recommendations at all times during the year.

AnnuAl RepoRt 2014 

19

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENTprinciple 6

Respect the rights of shareholders

The  Company  has  a  Communications  Policy  that  details  the  Company’s  strategy  to  communicate  with  shareholders  and 
actively promote shareholder involvement in the Company. It aims to continue to increase and improve the information available 
to  shareholders  on  its  website.  All  Company  announcements,  presentations  to  analysts  and  other  significant  briefings  are 
posted on the Company’s website after release to the Australian Securities Exchange.

The Board complied with the ASX Corporate Governance Council Principle 6 Recommendations at all times during the year.

principle 7

Recognise and manage risk

The Board oversees the establishment, implementation and ongoing review of the Company’s risk management and internal 
control system. Recommendation 7.1 requires that the Company has a formal risk management policy and internal compliance 
and control system. Resonance Health Limited, through its operating subsidiary Resonance Health Analysis Services Pty Ltd, 
maintained a Quality Management System (QMS) to international standards ISO13485:2003 for the whole financial year which 
encompass formal risk analysis processes.

Recommendation 7.2 requires implementation and review of the Company’s risk management and internal control system. The 
Company did not have a separately established risk committee. However, the duties and responsibilities typically delegated to 
such a committee are expressly included in the role of the Audit and Risk Committee and the main Board. The Board does not 
believe that any marked efficiencies or enhancements would be achieved by the creation of a separate risk committee.

In addition, the QMS requires the appointment of a Management Representative that reports directly to the Board of Directors. 
The Company also has in place classes of insurance at levels which, in the reasonable opinion of the Directors, are appropriate 
for its size and operations. Management has reported the effectiveness of the Company’s management of its material business 
risks to the Board during the reporting period.

In accordance with Recommendation 7.3 the Managing Director and the Chief Financial Officer provide written statements 
at each reporting period regarding the integrity of the financial statements and the Company’s risk management and internal 
compliance and control systems.

The Company’s Audit and Risk Charter is displayed on the Company’s website.

The Company’s external auditor is invited to attend the annual general meeting and questions from shareholders regarding the 
conduct of the audit and the preparation and content of the auditor’s report are welcomed.

The Company’s Communication Policy is displayed on the Company’s website. 

The Board complied with the ASX Corporate Governance Council Principle 7 Recommendations at all times during the year.

20 

ResonAnce heAlth limited

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENTprinciple 8

Remunerate fairly and responsibly

The Board has a Nomination and Remuneration Committee. Members of the Committee are outlined under Principle 2 above.

ASX Corporate Governance Council Principles recommend that the Remuneration Committee should consist of a majority of 
independent Directors, be chaired by an Independent Director and have at least three members.

The Nomination and Remuneration Committee regularly review the level and composition of remuneration of non-executive 
Directors,  executive  Directors  and  senior  management  with  regards  to  industry  best  practice,  Company  and  individual 
performance. During Financial year ended 30 June 2014 the Nomination and Remuneration Committee met two times.

The Company pays fees to The University of Western Australia for services provided by Dr St Pierre who is an executive Director 
of the Company.

All executive employees receive a base salary and superannuation. The Company does not have a share or option incentive 
plan. Accordingly, executive employees do not receive any equity based remuneration unless specifically approved on a case 
by case basis at a general meeting.

The members of the Nomination and Remuneration Committee are outlined in Principle 2. Their attendance at Nomination and 
Remuneration Committee meetings is detailed in the Directors’ Report. Director disclosure requirements are detailed in the 
notes to the financial statements.

The Nomination and Remuneration Committee Charter is displayed on the Company’s website.

The Board complied with the ASX Corporate Governance Council Principle 8 Recommendations at all times during the year.

AnnuAl RepoRt 2014 

21

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT-20-  

RESONANCE HEALTH LIMITED 

AUDITOR’S INDEPENDENCE DECLARATION 

As lead auditor for the audit of the consolidated financial report of Resonance Health Limited for the year ended 30 June 
2014, I declare that to the best of my knowledge and belief, there have been no contraventions of: 

(a) 

the auditor independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 in relation to the audit;  and 

(b) 

any applicable code of professional conduct in relation to the audit. 

Perth, Western Australia 
26 September 2014 

L Di Giallonardo
Partner 

HLB Mann Judd (WA Partnership)  ABN 22 193 232 714 

Level 4, 130 Stirling Street Perth WA 6000.  PO Box 8124 Perth BC 6849 Telephone +61 (08) 9227 7500. Fax +61 (08) 9227 7533. 

Email: hlb@hlbwa.com.au.  Website: http://www.hlb.com.au 

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation 

HLB Mann Judd (WA Partnership) is a member of 

 International, a worldwide organisation of accounting firms and business advisers. 

22 

ResonAnce heAlth limited

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Note

2(a)

2(b)

Sales revenue

Other income

Revenue

Employee benefits expense

Consulting and professional services

Research and development

Depreciation expense

Amortisation expense

Marketing and travel

Statutory and compliance

Foreign exchange gain

Due diligence expense

Other expenses

Loss before income tax benefit

Income tax benefit

3

Net loss for the year attributable to owners of the parent

Other comprehensive income 
Items that may be reclassified to profit and loss

Exchange differences arising on translation of foreign operations

Exchange differences arising on translation of foreign loan

Other comprehensive income/(loss) for the year, net of tax

Total comprehensive loss for the year attributable to owners
of the parent

Consolidated

2014 
$

2013 
$

2,284,565

24,471

2,309,036

(1,323,033)

(63,877)

(70,874)

(19,242)

(89,326)

(173,232)

(139,345)

(53,879)

(119,573)

(332,437)

(75,782)

3,367

(72,415)

1,527,188

181,959

1,709,147

(1,376,376)

(61,068)

(56,212)

(18,475)

(34,677)

(218,641)

(146,186)

156,584

-

(315,488)

(361,392)

156,911

(204,481)

(9,249)

9,827

578

(59,079)

(61,495)

(120,574)

(71,837)

(325,055)

Basic (loss) per share (cents per share)

5

(0.02)

(0.1)

The accompanying notes form part of these financial statements.

AnnuAl RepoRt 2014 

23

STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOMEFOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014Consolidated

Note

2014 
$

2013 
$

7

8

9

10

11

12

9

13

3

15

14

15

2,097,607

499,399

24,602

2,621,608

29,448

1,563,284

3,004

59,099

1,092,943

388,631

24,524

1,506,098

44,302

1,462,204

3,004

59,099

1,654,835

1,568,609

4,276,443

3,074,707

460,429

144,316

48,610

244,480

897,835

40,013

40,013

407,985

31,734

-

313,805

753,524

80,222

80,222

937,848

833,746

937,848

833,746

16(a)

68,703,510

(105,066)

(65,259,849)

3,338,595

67,534,039

(105,644)

(65,187,434)

2,240,961

Current Assets

Cash and cash equivalents

Trade and other receivables

Other assets

Total Current Assets

Non-Current Assets

Plant and equipment

Intangible assets

Other financial assets

Other assets

Total Non-Current Assets

Total Assets

Current Liabilities

Trade and other payables

Current tax liability

Provisions

Other liabilities

Total Current Liabilities

Non-Current Liabilities

Provisions

Total Non-Current Liabilities

Total Liabilities

Net Assets

Equity

Issued capital

Reserves

Accumulated losses

Total Equity

24 

ResonAnce heAlth limited

STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITIONFOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014 
Consolidated

Issued
Capital
$

Foreign
Currency
Translation
Reserve
$

Option
Reserve
$

Accumulated
Losses
$

Total 
Equity
$

Balance at 1 July 2012

67,534,039

(51,354)

66,284

(64,982,953)

2,566,016

Loss for the year

Other comprehensive loss

Total comprehensive loss for the year

Shares issued during the year

-

-

-

-

-

(120,574)

(120,574)

-

-

-

-

-

(204,481)

(204,481)

-

(120,574)

(204,481)

(325,055)

-

-

Balance at 30 June 2013

67,534,039

(171,928)

66,284

(65,187,434)

2,240,961

Loss for the year

Other comprehensive income

Total comprehensive income/(loss)  
for the year

-

-

-

-

578

578

Shares issued during the yearof foreign loan

1,169,471

-

-

-

-

-

(72,415)

(72,415)

-

578

(72,415)

(71,837)

-

1,169,471

Balance at 30 June 2014

68,703,510

(171,350)

66,284

(65,259,849)

3,338,595

The accompanying notes form part of these financial statements.

AnnuAl RepoRt 2014 

25

STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITYFOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014Consolidated

Note

2014 
$

2013 
$

Inflows/(Outflows)

Cash flows from operating activities

Receipts from customers

Payments to suppliers and employees

Due diligence expense

Grants received

Interest received

Income tax received

Net cash (used in)/provided by operating activities

7(i)

Cash flows from investing activities

Payments for plant and equipment

Payments for intangible assets

Net cash (used in) investing activities

Cash flows from financing activities

Share issues

Share issue costs

Net cash provided by financing activities

Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

Foreign exchange differences on cash balances

Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of period

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period

7

2,179,241

(2,134,816)

(94,629)

-

19,814

-

(30,390)

(4,389)

(190,406)

(194,795)

1,277,521

(48,672)

1,228,849

1,003,664

1,000

1,092,943

2,097,607

1,860,846

(2,096,671)

-

146,051

38,157

188,645

137,028

(25,625)

(205,337)

(230,962)

-

-

-

(93,934)

6,703

1,180,174

1,092,943

26 

ResonAnce heAlth limited

STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWSFOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014 
note 1: statement of significant accounting policies

(a) Basis of preparation

The financial report is a general purpose financial report which has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the 
Corporations Act 2001, Accounting Standards and Interpretations and complies with other requirements of the law.

The financial report has been prepared on a historical cost basis, except for available-for-sale investments, which have been 
measured at fair value. Cost is based on the fair values of the consideration given in exchange for assets.

The financial report is presented in Australian dollars. The Company is a listed public Company, incorporated and operating 
in Australia and the United States of America. The Company’s business involves the development and commercialisation of 
technologies and services for the quantitative analysis of radiological images in a regulated and quality controlled environment.

(b) Adoption of new and revised standards

In the year ended 30 June 2014, the Directors have reviewed all of the new and revised Standards and Interpretations issued 
by the AASB that are relevant to the Group’s operations and effective for the current annual reporting period.

It has been determined by the Directors that there is no impact, material or otherwise, of the new and revised Standards and 
Interpretations on the Group’s business and, therefore, no change is necessary to Group accounting policies.

The Directors have also reviewed all new Standards and Interpretations that have been issued but are not yet effective for the 
year ended 30 June 2014. As a result of this review the Directors have determined that there is no impact, material or otherwise, 
of the new and revised Standards and Interpretations on the Group’s business and, therefore, no change necessary to Group 
accounting policies.

(c) Statement of compliance

The financial report was authorised for issue on 26 September 2014.

The  financial  report  complies  with  Australian  Accounting  Standards,  which  include  Australian  equivalents  to  International 
Financial  Reporting  Standards  (AIFRS).  Compliance  with  AIFRS  ensures  that  the  financial  report,  comprising  the  financial 
statements and notes thereto, complies with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).

(d) Basis of consolidation

The consolidated financial statements comprise the separate financial statements of Resonance Health Limited (“Company” 
or “parent entity”) and its subsidiaries as at 30 June each year (“the Group”). Control is achieved where the Company has the 
power to govern the financial and operating policies of an entity so as to obtain benefits from its activities.

The financial statements of the subsidiaries are prepared for the same reporting period as the parent Company, using consistent 
accounting policies.

In preparing the consolidated financial statements, all intercompany balances and transactions, income and expenses and 
profit and losses resulting from intra-group transactions have been eliminated in full. Subsidiaries are fully consolidated from the 
date on which control is transferred to the Group and cease to be consolidated from the date on which control is transferred 
out of the Group. Control exists where the Company has the power to govern the financial and operating policies of an entity 
so as to obtain benefits from its activities.

Business combinations have been accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting (refer Note 1(ab)). Non-controlling 
interests represent the portion of profit or loss and net assets in subsidiaries not held by the Group and are presented separately 
in the statement of comprehensive income and within equity in the consolidated statement of financial position. Losses are 
attributed to the non-controlling interest even if that results in a deficit balance.

AnnuAl RepoRt 2014 

27

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014note 1: statement of significant accounting policies

(e) Critical accounting judgements and key sources of estimation uncertainty

The application of accounting policies requires the use of judgements, estimates and assumptions about carrying values of 
assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. The estimates and associated assumptions are based on 
historical experience and other factors that are considered to be relevant.

Actual results may differ from these estimates.

The estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions are recognised in the period in which 
the estimate is revised if it affects only that period, or in the period of the revision and future periods if the revision affects both 
current and future periods.

Impairment of intangibles

The Group determines whether intangibles with indefinite useful lives are impaired at least on an annual basis. This requires 
an estimation of the recoverable amount of the cash generating units to which the intangibles with indefinite useful lives are 
allocated. The assumptions used in this estimation of recoverable amount and the carrying amount of intangibles with indefinite 
useful lives are discussed in Note 11.

Additionally, the Group assesses impairment at the end of each reporting period by evaluating conditions and events specific 
to the Group that may indicate impairment triggers. Recoverable amounts of relevant assets are reassessed using value-in-use 
calculations which incorporate various key assumptions.

With respect to cash flow projections growth rates have been factored into valuation models for the next five years on the 
basis of management’s expectations regarding the Group’s continued ability to increase market share based on contractual 
obligations already in place and historical sales growth rates. Historic Group averages have been used to reflect projected cash 
flow growth rates in year 1 and year 2. In subsequent periods a consistent growth rate has been attached as a conservative 
estimate for use in the impairment calculation.

Pre-tax discount rate of 10% which includes a risk component, has been used throughout the value in use model.

Development expenditure is considered to be sensitive to these assumptions as they are not ready for use. Therefore sensitivity 
analysis of 5% and 10% reduction in revenue and the use of a pre-tax discount rate of 15%, have been calculated and did not 
indicate an impairment.

Share-based payment transactions

The Group measures the cost of cash-settled share-based payments at fair value at the grant date.

(f) Segment reporting

Operating segments are reported in a manner consistent with the internal reporting provided to the chief operating decision 
maker.  The  chief  operating  decision  maker,  who  is  responsible  for  allocating  resources  and  assessing  performance  of  the 
operating segments, has been identified as the Board of Directors of Resonance Health Limited.

(g) Foreign currency translation

Both the functional and presentation currency of Resonance Health Limited and its Australian subsidiaries is Australian dollars. 
Each entity in the Group determines its own functional currency and items included in the financial statements of each entity 
are measured using that functional currency.

Transactions  in  foreign  currencies  are  initially  recorded  in  the  functional  currency  by  applying  the  exchange  rates  ruling  at 
the date of the transaction. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are retranslated at the rate of 
exchange ruling at the statement of financial position date.

All exchange differences in the consolidated financial report are taken to profit or loss.

Non-monetary items that are measured in terms of historical cost in a foreign currency are translated using the exchange rate 
as at the date of the initial transaction.

Non-monetary items measured at fair value in a foreign currency are translated using the exchange rates at the date the fair 
value was determined.

28 

ResonAnce heAlth limited

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014note 1: statement of significant accounting policies

(g) Foreign currency translation (Continued)

The functional currency of the foreign operation Resonance USA Inc. is United States dollars (US$). As at the reporting date 
the assets and liabilities of this subsidiary are translated into the presentation currency of Resonance Health Limited at the rate 
of exchange ruling at the balance date and the statement of comprehensive income is translated at the average exchange rate 
for the year. The exchange differences arising on the translation are taken directly to a separate component recognised in the 
foreign currency translation reserve in equity. On disposal of a foreign entity, the deferred cumulative amount recognised in 
equity relating to that particular foreign operation is recognised in the Statement of Comprehensive Income.

(h) Revenue recognition

Revenue is recognised to the extent that it is probable that economic benefits will flow to the Group and the revenue can be 
reliably measured. The following specific recognition criteria must also be met before revenue is recognised:

(i) Sale of Goods

Revenue is recognised when the significant risks and rewards of ownership of the goods have passed to the buyer and the 
costs incurred or to be incurred in respect of the transaction can be measured reliably. Risks and rewards of ownership are 
considered passed to the buyer at the time of delivery of the goods to the customer.

 (ii)  Rendering of services
Revenue from the rendering of a service is recognised upon the delivery of the service to the customers.

 (iii) Interest income
 Interest revenue is recognised on a time proportionate basis that takes into account the effective yield on the financial asset.

(i) Borrowing costs
Borrowing costs are recognised as an expense when incurred.

(j) Lease

 Leases  are  classified  as  finance  leases  whenever  the  terms  of  the  lease  transfer  substantially  all  the  risks  and  rewards  if 
ownership to the lessee. All other leases are classified as operating leases.

 Assets held under finance lease are initially recognised at their fair value or, if lower, the present value of the minimum lease 
payments, each determined at the inception of the lease. The corresponding liability to the lessor is included in the statement 
of financial position as a finance lease obligation.

 Lease  payments  are  apportioned  between  finance  charges  and  the  reduction  of  the  lease  obligation  so  as  to  achieve  a 
constant rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability. Finance charges are charged directly against income unless 
they are directly attributable to qualifying assets, in which case they are capitalised in accordance with the general policy on 
borrowing costs.

Finance lease assets are depreciated on a straight line basis over the estimated useful life of the asset.

 Operating lease payments, where the lessor effectively retains substantially all of the risks and benefits of ownership of the 
leased items, are recognised as an expense on a straight line basis over the lease term, except where another systematic basis 
is more representative of the time pattern in which economic benefits from the lease asset are consumed.

(k) Income tax

The  income  tax  expense  or  benefit  for  the  period  is  the  tax  payable  on  the  current  period’s  taxable  income  based  on  the 
applicable  income  tax  rate  for  each  jurisdiction  adjusted  by  changes  in  deferred  tax  assets  and  liabilities  attributable  to 
temporary difference and to unused tax losses.

The current income tax charge is calculated on the basis of the tax laws enacted or substantively enacted at the end of the 
reporting period in the countries where the Company’s subsidiaries and associates operate and generate taxable income. 
Management periodically evaluates positions taken in tax returns with respect to situations in which applicable tax regulation 
is subject to interpretation. It establishes provisions where appropriate on the basis of amounts expected to be paid to the 
tax authorities.

AnnuAl RepoRt 2014 

29

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014 
 
 
 
 
 
 
note 1: statement of significant accounting policies

(k) Income tax (Continued)

Current tax assets and liabilities for the current and prior periods are measured at the amount expected to be recovered from 
or  paid  to  the  taxation  authorities.  The  tax  rates  and  tax  laws  used  to  compute  the  amount  are  those  that  are  enacted  or 
substantially enacted by the balance date.

Deferred income tax is provided on all temporary differences at the balance date between the tax bases of assets and liabilities 
and their carrying amounts for financial reporting purposes.

Deferred income tax liabilities are recognised for all taxable temporary differences except:

•	 when the deferred income tax liability arises from the initial recognition of goodwill or of an asset or liability in a transaction 
that is not a business combination and that, at the time of the transaction, affects neither the accounting profit nor taxable 
profit or loss; or

•	 when  the  taxable  temporary  difference  is  associated  with  investments  in  subsidiaries,  associates  or  interests  in  joint 
ventures, and the timing of the reversal of the temporary difference can be controlled and it is probable that the temporary 
difference will not reverse in the foreseeable future.

Deferred income tax assets are recognised for all deductible temporary differences, carry-forward of unused tax assets and 
unused tax losses, to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be available against which the deductible temporary 
differences and the carry-forward of unused tax credits and unused tax losses can be utilised, except:

•	 when the deferred income tax asset relating to the deductible temporary difference arises from the initial recognition of an 
asset or liability in a transaction that is not a business combination and, at the time of the transaction, affects neither the 
accounting profit, nor taxable profit or loss; or

•	 when the deductible temporary difference is associated with investments in subsidiaries, associates or interests in joint 
ventures,  in  which  case  a  deferred  tax  asset  is  only  recognised  to  the  extent  that  it  is  probable  that  the  temporary 
difference will reverse in the foreseeable future and taxable profit will be available against with the temporary difference 
can be utilised.

The carrying amount of deferred income tax assets is reviewed at each balance date and reduced to the extent that it is no 
longer probable that sufficient taxable profit will be available to allow all or part of the deferred income tax asset to be utilised.
Unrecognised deferred income tax assets are reassessed at each balance date and are recognised to the extent that it is has 
become probable that future taxable profit will allow the deferred tax asset to be recovered.

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the year when the asset 
is realised or the liability is settled, based on tax rates (and tax laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted at the 
balance date.

Income taxes relating to items recognised directly in equity are recognised in equity and not in profit or loss. Deferred tax assets 
and deferred tax liabilities are offset only if a legally enforceable right exists to set off current tax assets against current tax 
liabilities and the deferred tax assets and liabilities relate to the same taxable entity and the same taxation authority.

(l) Other taxes

Revenues, expenses and assets are recognised net of the amount of Goods and Services Tax (GST) except:

•	 when the GST incurred on a purchase of goods and services is not recoverable from the taxation authority, in which case 
the GST is recognised as part of the cost of acquisition of the asset or as part of the expense item as applicable; and

receivables and payables, which are stated with the amount of GST included.

•	
The net amount of GST recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation authority is included as part of receivables or payables in 
the statement of financial position.

Cash flows are included in the Statement of Cash Flows on a gross basis and the GST component of cash flows arising from 
investing and financing activities, which is recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation authority are classified as operating 
cash flows.

Commitments and contingencies are disclosed net of the amount of GST recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation authority.

30 

ResonAnce heAlth limited

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014note 1: statement of significant accounting policies

(m) Impairment of assets

The Group assesses at each balance date whether there is an indication that an asset may be impaired. If any such indication exists, 
or when annual impairment testing for an asset is required, the Group makes an estimate of the asset’s recoverable amount. An 
asset’s recoverable amount is the higher of its fair value less costs to sell and its value in use and is determined for an individual asset, 
unless the asset does not generate cash inflows that are largely independent of those from other assets or groups of assets and 
the asset’s value in use cannot be estimated to be close to its fair value. In such cases the asset is tested for impairment as part of 
the cashgenerating unit to which it belongs. When the carrying amount of an asset or cash-generating unit exceeds its recoverable 
amount, the asset or cash-generating unit is considered impaired and is written down to its recoverable amount.

In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate 
that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and adjusted risk specific to the asset. Impairment losses 
relating to continuing operations are recognised in those expense categories consistent with the function of the impaired asset 
unless the asset is carried at revalued amount (in which case the impairment loss is treated as a revaluation decrease).

An assessment is also made at each balance date as to whether there is any indication that previously recognised impairment 
losses may no longer exist or may have decreased. If such indication exists, the recoverable amount is estimated. A previously 
recognised impairment loss is reversed only if there has been a change in the estimates used to determine the asset’s recoverable 
amount since the last impairment loss was recognised. If that is the case the carrying amount of the asset is increased to its 
recoverable amount. That increased amount cannot exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined, net of 
depreciation, had no impairment loss been recognised for the asset in prior years. Such reversal is recognised in statement of 
comprehensive income unless the asset is carried at revalued amount, in which case the reversal is treated as a revaluation 
increase. After such a reversal the depreciation charge is adjusted in future periods to allocate the asset’s revised carrying 
amount, less any residual value, on a systematic basis over its remaining useful life.

(n) Cash and cash equivalents

Cash comprises cash at bank and in hand. Cash equivalents are short term, highly liquid investments that are readily convertible 
to known amounts of cash and which are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value.

Bank overdrafts are shown within borrowings in current liabilities in the statement of financial position. For the purposes of the 
Statement of Cash Flows, cash and cash equivalents consist of cash and cash equivalents as defined above.

(o) Trade and other receivables

Trade receivables are measured on initial recognition at fair value and are subsequently measured at amortised cost using 
the effective interest rate method, less any allowance for impairment. Trade receivables are generally due for settlement within 
periods ranging from 14 days to 90 days.

Impairment of trade receivables is continually reviewed and those that are considered to be uncollectible are written off by 
reducing the carrying amount directly. An allowance account is used when there is objective evidence that the Group will not 
be able to collect all amounts due according to the original contractual terms.

Factors considered by the Group in making this determination include known significant financial difficulties of the debtor, review of 
financial information and significant delinquency in making contractual payments to the Group. The impairment allowance is set equal 
to the difference between the carrying amount of the receivable and the present value of estimated future cash flows, discounted at 
the original effective interest rate. Where receivables are short-term discounting is not applied in determining the allowance.

The amount of the impairment loss is recognised in the statement of comprehensive income within other expenses. When a trade 
receivable for which an impairment allowance had been recognised becomes uncollectible in a subsequent period, it is written 
off against the allowance account. Subsequent recoveries of amounts previously written off are credited against other expenses 
in the statement of comprehensive income.

(p) Financial assets

Financial assets in the scope of AASB 139 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement are classified as either financial 
assets at fair value through profit or loss, loans and receivables, held-to-maturity investments, or available-for-sale investments, 
as appropriate. Where financial assets are recognised initially, they are measured at fair value, plus, in the case of investments not 
at fair value through profit or loss, directly attributable transaction costs. The Group determines the classification of its financial 
assets after initial recognition and, when allowed and appropriate, re-evaluates this designation at each financial year-end.

AnnuAl RepoRt 2014 

31

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014note 1: statement of significant accounting policies

(p) Financial assets (Continued)

All regular way purchases and sales of financial assets are recognised on the trade date, i.e. the date that the Group commits 
to purchase the asset. Regular way purchases or sales of financial assets under contracts that require delivery of the assets 
within the period established generally by regulation or convention in the marketplace.

(i) Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss
 Financial assets classified as held for trading are included in the category ‘financial assets at fair value through profit or 
loss’. Financial assets are classified as held for trading if they are acquired for the purpose of selling in the near term. Gains 
or losses on investments held for trading are recognised in profit or loss.

(ii) Held-to-maturity investments
 Non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments and fixed maturity are classified as held-tomaturity 
when the Group has the positive intention and ability to hold to maturity. Investments intended to be held for an undefined 
period are not included in this classification.

(iii) Loans and receivables
 Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets that are not quoted in an active market. Gains and losses are 
recognised in the profit or loss when the loans and receivables are derecognised or impaired.

(iv) Available-for-sale investments
 Available-for-sale investments are those non-derivative financial assets that are designated as available-for-sale or are not 
classified as any of the three preceding categories. After initial recognition available-for-sale investments are measured at 
fair value with gains or losses being recognised as a separate component of equity until the investment is derecognised or 
until the investment is determined to be impaired, at which time the cumulative gain or loss previously reported in equity 
is recognised in profit or loss.

The fair value of investments that are actively traded in organised financial markets is determined by reference to quoted market 
bid prices at the close of business on the balance date. For investments with no active market, fair value is determined using 
valuation techniques. Such techniques include using recent arm’s length market transactions; reference to the current market 
value of another instrument that is substantially the same; discounted cash flow analysis and option pricing models.

(q) Derecognition of financial assets and liabilities

(i) Financial assets
 A  financial  asset  (or,  where  applicable,  a  part  of  a  financial  asset  or  part  of  a  group  of  similar  financial  assets)  is 
derecognised when:

•	

•	

the	rights	to	receive	cash	flows	from	the	asset	have	expired;

	the	Group	retains	the	right	to	receive	cash	flows	from	the	asset,	but	has	assumed	an	obligation	to	pay	them	in	full	
without material delay to a third party under a ‘pass-through’ arrangement; or

•	

the	Group	has	transferred	its	rights	to	receive	cash	flows	from	the	asset	and	either:

(a) has transferred substantially all the risks and rewards of the asset, or

(b)  has neither transferred nor retained substantially all the risks and rewards of the asset, but has transferred control 

of the asset.

When  the  Group  has  transferred  its  rights  to  receive  cash  flows  from  an  asset  and  has  neither  transferred  nor  retained 
substantially all the risks and rewards of the asset nor transferred control of the asset, the asset is recognised to the extent of 
the Group’s continuing involvement in the asset.

 (ii) Financial liabilities
A financial liability is recognised when the obligation under the liability is discharged or cancelled or expired.

 When an existing financial liability is replaced by another from the same lender on substantially different terms, or the terms 
of an existing liability are substantially modified, such an exchange or modification is treated as a derecognition of the 
original liability and the recognition of a new liability, and the difference in the respective carrying amounts is recognised 
in profit or loss.

32 

ResonAnce heAlth limited

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
	
	
	
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
note 1: statement of significant accounting policies

(r) Impairment of financial assets

The Group assess at each balance date whether a financial asset or group of financial assets is impaired.

(i) Financial assets carried at amortised cost
 If there is objective evidence that an impairment loss on loans and receivables carried at amortised cost has been incurred, 
the amount of the loss is measured as the difference between the asset’s carrying amount and the present value of estimated 
future  cash  flows  (excluding  future  credit  losses  that  have  not  been  incurred)  discounted  at  the  financial  asset’s  original 
effective  interest  rate  (i.e.  the  effective  interest  rate  computed  at  initial  recognition).  The  carrying  amount  of  the  asset  is 
reduced either directly or through use of an allowance account. The amount of the loss is recognised in profit or loss.

 The Group first assesses whether objective evidence of impairment exists individually for financial assets that are individually 
significant, and individually or collectively for financial assets that are not individually significant. If it is determined that no 
objective evidence of impairment exists for an individually assessed financial asset, whether significant or not, the asset is 
included in a group of financial assets with similar credit risk characteristics and that group of financial asset is collectively 
assessed  for  impairment.  Assets  that  are  individually  assessed  for  impairment  and  for  which  an  impairment  loss  is  or 
continues to be recognised are not included in a collective assessment of impairment.

 If,  in  a  subsequent  period,  the  amount  of  the  impairment  loss  decreases  and  the  decrease  can  be  related  objectively 
to an event occurring after the impairment was recognised, the previously recognised impairment loss is reversed. Any 
subsequent reversal of an impairment loss is recognised in profit or loss, to the extent that the carrying value of the asset 
does not exceed its amortised cost at the reversal date.

(ii) Financial assets carried at cost
 If there is objective evidence that an impairment loss has been incurred on an unquoted equity instrument that is not carried 
at  fair  value  (because  its  fair  value  cannot  be  reliably  measured),  the  amount  of  the  loss  is  measured  as  the  difference 
between the asset’s carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows, discounted at the current market 
rate of return for a similar financial asset. Such impairment loss should not be reversed in subsequent periods.

(iii) Available-for-sale investments
 If  there  is  objective  evidence  that  an  available-for-sale  investment  is  impaired,  an  amount  comprising  the  difference 
between its cost (net of any principal repayment and amortisation) and its current fair value, less any impairment loss 
previously recognised in profit or loss, is transferred from equity to the income statement. Reversals of impairment losses 
for equity instruments classified as available-for-sale are not recognised in profit. Reversals of impairment losses for debt 
instruments are reversed through profit or loss if the increase in an instrument’s fair value can be objectively related to an 
event occurring after the impairment loss was recognised in profit or loss.

(s) Plant and equipment

Plant and equipment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and any accumulated impairment losses.

Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the assets as follows:

Plant and equipment  

3 – 5 years

The assets’ residual values, useful lives and amortisation methods are reviewed, and adjusted if appropriate, at each financial 
year end.

(i) Impairment
 The carrying values of plant and equipment are reviewed for impairment at each balance date, with recoverable amount 
being estimated when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may be impaired.

 The recoverable amount of plant and equipment is the higher of fair value less costs to sell and value in use. In assessing 
value  in  use,  the  estimated  future  cash  flows  are  discounted  to  their  present  value  using  a  pre-tax  discount  rate  that 
reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset.

 For an asset that does not generate largely independent cash inflows, recoverable amount is determined for the cash-generating 
unit to which the asset belongs, unless the asset’s value in use can be estimated to be close to its fair value.

AnnuAl RepoRt 2014 

33

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
note 1: statement of significant accounting policies

(s) Plant and equipment (Continued)
An impairment exists when the carrying value of an asset or cash-generating units exceeds its estimated recoverable amount. 
The asset or cash-generating unit is then written down to its recoverable amount.

Impairment losses for plant and equipment are recognised in the statement of comprehensive income.

(ii) Derecognition and disposal
 An item of plant and equipment is derecognised upon disposal or when no further future economic benefits areexpected 
from its use or disposal.

 Any gain or loss arising on derecognition of the asset (calculated as the difference between the net disposal proceeds and 
the carrying amount of the asset) is included in the statement of comprehensive income in the year the asset is derecognised.

(t) Intangible assets

Internally generated intangible assets – research and development expenditure

Expenditure  on  research  activities  is  recognised  as  an  expense  in  the  period  in  which  it  is  incurred.  Where  no  internally-
generated intangible asset can be recognised, development expenditure is recognised as an expense in the period as incurred.

An intangible asset arising from development expenditure on an internal project is recognised if, and only if, all of the following 
have been demonstrated:

The technical feasibility of completing the intangible asset so that it will be available for use or sale;

The intention to complete the intangible asset and use or sell it;

•	
•	
•	 How the intangible asset will generate probable future economic benefits;
•	

The availability of adequate technical, financial and other resources to complete development and to use or sell the intangible 
asset; and

The ability to measure reliably the expenditure attributable to the intangible asset during its development.

•	
The amount initially recognised for internally generated intangible assets is the sum of the expenditure incurred from the date 
when the intangible asset first meets the recognition criteria listed above.

(u) Trade and other payables

Trade payables and other payables are carried at amortised costs and represent liabilities for goods and services provided 
to the Group prior to the end of the financial year that are unpaid and arise when the Group becomes obliged to make future 
payments in respect of the purchase of these goods and services. The amounts are unsecured and are usually paid within 30 
days of recognition. Trade and other payables are presented as current liabilities unless payment is not due within 12 months.

(v) Interest-bearing loans and borrowings

Borrowings are initially recognised at fair value, net of transaction costs incurred. Borrowings are subsequently measured at 
amortised cost. Any difference between the proceeds (net of transaction costs) and the redemption amount is recognised in 
profit or loss over the period of the borrowings using the effective interest method.

Borrowings are removed from the statement of financial position when the obligation specified in the contract is discharged, 
cancelled or expired. The difference between the carrying amount of a financial liability that has been extinguished or transferred 
to another party and the consideration paid, including any non-cash assets transferred or liabilities assumed, is recognised in 
profit or loss as other income or finance costs.

Borrowings are classified as current liabilities unless the Group has an unconditional right to defer settlement of the liability for 
at least 12 months after the reporting period.

(w) Provisions

Provisions  are  recognised  when  the  Group  has  a  present  obligation  (legal  or  constructive)  as  a  result  of  a  past  event,  it  is 
probable  that  an  outflow  of  resources  embodying  economic  benefits  will  be  required  to  settle  the  obligation  and  a  reliable 

34 

ResonAnce heAlth limited

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014 
 
 
note 1: statement of significant accounting policies

(w)  Provisions (Continued)

estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation. Provisions are not recognised forfuture operating losses. Provisions are 
measured at the present value or management’s best estimate of the expenditure required to settle the present obligation at 
the end of the reporting period.

(x) Employee benefits

Wages, salaries, annual leave, sick leave and long service leave

Liabilities for wages and salaries, including non-monetary benefits, annual leave, long service leave and sick leave expected 
to be settled within 12 months of the balance date are recognised in sundry creditors in respect of employees’ services up to 
the balance date. They are measured at the amounts expected to be paid when the liabilities are settled. Liabilities for non-
accumulating sick leave are recognised when the leave is taken and are measured at the rates paid or payable.

(y) Share-based payment transactions

Equity-settled transactions

The Group uses agreements where payment for services rendered are settled by the issuance of fully paid shares or options 
in the Company.

The cost of these equity-settled transactions is measured by reference to the fair value of the equity instruments at the date 
they are granted and is recognised, together with a corresponding increase in equity, over the period in which the service 
is provided.

(z) Issued capital

Ordinary shares are classified as equity. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new shares or options are shown 
in equity as a deduction, net of tax, from the proceeds.

(aa) Earnings per share (“EPS”)

Basic EPS is calculated as net profit/loss attributable to members of the parent, adjusted to exclude any costs of servicing 
equity (other than dividends) and preference share dividends, divided by the weighted average number of ordinary shares, 
adjusted for any bonus element.

Diluted EPS is calculated as net profit/loss attributable to members of the parent, adjusted for:

•	
•	

•	

costs of servicing equity (other than dividends) and preference share dividends;

the after tax effect of dividends and interest associated with dilutive potential ordinary shares that have been recognised 
as expenses; and

other non-discretionary changes in revenues or expenses during the period that would result from the dilution of potential 
ordinary shares;

divided by the weighted average number of ordinary shares and dilutive potential ordinary shares, adjusted for any bonus element.

(ab) Business combinations

The  acquisition  method  of  accounting  is  used  to  account  for  all  business  combinations,  including  business  combinations 
involving entities or business under common control, regardless of whether equity instruments or other assets are acquired. 
The consideration transferred for the acquisition of a subsidiary comprises the fair value of the assets transferred, the liabilities 
incurred and the equity interests issued by the group. The consideration transferred also includes the fair value of any contingent 
consideration arrangements and the fair value of any pre-existing equity interest in the subsidiary. Acquisition-related costs are 
expenses as incurred.

Identifiable  assets  acquired  and  liabilities  and  contingent  liabilities  assumed  in  a  business  combination  are,  with  limited 
exceptions,  measured  initially  at  their  fair  values  at  the  acquisition  date.  On  an  acquisition-by-acquisition  basis,  the  group 
recognises any non-controlling interest in the acquiree either at fair value or at the non-controlling interest’s proportionate share 
of the acquiree’s net identifiable assets.

AnnuAl RepoRt 2014 

35

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014note 1: statement of significant accounting policies

(ab) Business combinations (Continued)

The excess of the consideration transferred, the amount of any non-controlling interest in the acquiree and the acquisition-date 
fair value of any previous equity interest in the acquiree over the fair value of the group’s share of the net identifiable assets 
acquired is recorded as goodwill. If those amounts are less than the fair value of the net identifiable assets of the subsidiary 
acquired and the measurement of all amounts has been reviewed, the difference is recognised directly in profit or loss as a 
bargain purchase.

Where  settlement  of  any  part  of  cash  consideration  is  deferred,  the  amounts  payable  in  the  future  are  discounted  to  their 
present value as at the date of exchange. The discount rate used is the entity’s incremental borrowing rate, being the rate at 
which a contingent consideration is classified as either equity or a financial liability. Amounts classified as a financial liability are 
subsequently remeasured to fair value with changes in fair value recognised in profit or loss.

(ac) Parent entity financial information

The financial information for the parent entity, Resonance Health Limited, disclosed in Note 20 has been prepared on the same 
basis as the consolidated financial statements, except as set out below.

(i) Investments in subsidiaries, associates and joint venture entities
 Investments  in  subsidiaries,  associates  and  joint  venture  entities  are  accounted  for  at  cost  in  the  parent  entity’s 
financial statements.

note 2: revenues anD expenses

(a)

 Sales revenue

Sales to external customers

(b) Other income

Grants received

Interest received

(c) Expenses

Consolidated

2014 
$

2013 
$

2,284,565

1,527,188

-

24,471

24,471

146,051

35,908

181,959

Rental expense on operating leases

101,997

98,074

36 

ResonAnce heAlth limited

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014 
 
note 3: income tax benefit

Income tax recognised in profit or loss

The major components of tax benefit are:

Current taxation

Adjustments recognised in the current year in relation to the current 
tax of prior years – R&D tax offset

Consolidated

2014 
$

2013 
$

(112,582)

(31,734)

115,949

3,367

188,645

156,911

The prima facie income tax benefit on pre-tax accounting loss 
from operations reconciles to the income tax benefit in the financial 
statements as follows:

Accounting loss before income tax

(75,782)

(361,392)

Income tax benefit calculated at 30%

Effect of expenses that are not deductible in determining taxable profit

Effect of unused tax losses not recognised as deferred tax assets

Effect of prior year adjustments

Effect of temporary differences not recognised as deferred tax assets 
and liabilities

Effect of capital raising costs recognised directly in equity

Tax refund receivable (research and development tax offset)

Income tax benefit reported in the statement of comprehensive income

22,735

(131,726)

886

-

(36,892)

32,415

115,949

3,367

108,418

(170,727)

(30,229)

(16,340)

77,144

-

188,645

156,911

AnnuAl RepoRt 2014 

37

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014note 3: income tax benefit

Unrecognised deferred tax balances

The following deferred tax assets and liabilities have not been brought to account:

Deferred tax assets:

Losses available for offset against future taxable income - revenue

2,200,004

2,200,889

Consolidated

2014 
$

2013 
$

Depreciation timing differences

Business related costs

Unrealised foreign exchange losses

Accrued expenses and liabilities

Deferred tax liabilities:

Capitalised research and development costs

Accrued income

Prepayments

Income tax benefits not recognised directly in equity

Share issue costs

Recognised balances

Current tax liability

Income tax payable

34,913

71,993

97,838

81,331

45,423

3,160

88,292

80,565

2,486,079

2,418,329

468,985

1,777

7,380

478,142

438,661

380

7,357

446,398

32,415

152,765

144,316

31,734

38 

ResonAnce heAlth limited

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014note 4: segment reporting

Segment Information

The chief operating decision maker is considered to be the Company’s Board of Directors. The Group’s operating segments 
are determined by differences in the type of activities performed. The financial results of the Group’s operating segments are 
reviewed by the Board of Directors on a quarterly basis.

Business Segments

The following table presents revenue and profit/loss information and certain asset and liability information regarding business 
segments for the year ended 30 June 2014.

Segment revenue

Sales to external customers

Interest revenue

Total segment revenue

Services 
$

Research and 
Development
$

Corporate
$

Total 
$

2,284,565

-

2,284,565

-

-

-

-

2,284,565

24,471

24,471

24,471

2,309,036

Segment profit/(loss) before tax

661,665

(96,678)

(640,769)

(75,782)

Other segment information included in loss

Income tax benefit

Segment assets

Segment liabilities

-

3,367

-

3,367

499,399

849,225

1,563,282

2,213,762

4,276,443

-

88,623

937,848

The consolidated entity derived 38% of its external customer sales revenue from one major customer.

AnnuAl RepoRt 2014 

39

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014note 4: segment reporting

The following table presents revenue and profit/loss information and certain asset and liability information regarding business 
segments for the year ended 30 June 2013.

Segment revenue

Sales to external customers

Grant revenue

Interest revenue

Total segment revenue

Services 
$

Research and 
Development
$

Corporate
$

Total 
$

1,527,188

146,051

-

1,673,239

-

-

-

-

-

-

35,908

35,908

1,527,188

146,051

35,908

1,709,147

Segment profit/(loss)

70,641

24,868

(299,990)

(204,481)

Other segment information included in loss

Income tax benefit

Segment assets

Segment liabilities

-

156,911

-

156,911

388,631

590,816

1,462,204

1,223,872

3,074,707

48,599

194,331

833,746

40 

ResonAnce heAlth limited

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014note 5: earnings per share

Basic loss per share (cents per share)

(0.02)

0.1)

(a) Loss used in the calculation of basic earnings per share

(72,415)

(204,481)

Consolidated

2014 
$

2013 
$

2014  
Number

2013 
Number

(b)  Weighted average number of ordinary shares for the purposes  

of basic loss per share

363,572,613

360,991,365

The calculation does not include shares under option that could potentially dilute basic earnings per share in the future as no 
options are on issue.

note 6: DiviDenDs

No dividend was paid or declared for the current or previous financial year.

note 7: cash anD cash equivalents

Deposits at call

Term deposits

Consolidated

2014 
$

497,607

1,600,000

$2,097,607

2013 
$

492,943

600,000

1,092,943

Deposits at call earn interest at floating rates based on daily bank deposit rates.

Term deposits are made for varying periods depending on the immediate cash requirements of the Group and earn interest at 
the respective term deposit rates.

AnnuAl RepoRt 2014 

41

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014note 7: cash anD cash equivalents (continueD)

(i) Reconciliation of loss for the year to net cash flows from operating activities

Loss for the year

Non-cash flows in loss:

Depreciation

Amortisation of intangible assets

Changes in net assets and liabilities:

(Increase)/Decrease in receivables

(Increase)/Decrease in other assets (current)

(Increase) in assets (non-current)

Decrease in trade creditors and other payables

Increase in current tax liabilities

Decrease/(increase) in other liabilities

Net cash (used in)/provided by operating activities

(ii) Financing facilities

Unsecured credit card:

Amount used

Amount unused

Net cash (used in)/provided by operating activities

Secured credit card:

Amount used

Amount unused

(iii) Cash balances not available for use

Security deposits:

Credit card

Lease premises

42 

ResonAnce heAlth limited

Consolidated

2014 
$

2013 
$

(72,415)

(204,481)

19,242

89,326

(111,191)

(78)

-

1,469

112,582

(69,325)

(30,647)

18,475

34,677

240,927

2,446

(708)

29,669

31,734

(15,711)

137,028

Consolidated

2014 
$

2013 
$

11,073

8,927

20,000

1,202

18,798

20,000

12,834

7,166

20,000

493

19,507

20,000

Consolidated

2014 
$

2013 
$

20,000

39,099

59,099

20,000

39,099

59,099

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014 
 
 
note 8: traDe anD other receivables

Current

Trade receivables

Other receivables

Consolidated

2014 
$

2013 
$

365,592

133,807

499,399

342,203

46,428

388,631

The average credit period on sales of goods and rendering of services is 14 to 90 days.

Aging of past due but not impaired

Up to 30 days

60-90 days

90-120 days

120+ days

Net cash (used in)/provided by operating activities

Movement in the allowance for impairment

Balance at the beginning of the year

Impairment losses recognised on receivables

Balance at the end of the year

Consolidated

2014 
$

2013 
$

84,668

23,984

33,748

-

142,400

-

-

-

159,789

31,751

15,281

-

206,821

-

-

-

In  determining  the  recoverability  of  a  trade  receivable,  the  Group  considers  any  changes  in  the  credit  quality  of  the 
trade receivable from the date credit was granted up to the reporting date. No allowance has been made for estimated 
irrecoverable trade receivable amounts arising from the past rendering of services in relation to a specific debtor amount. 
The concentration of credit risk is significant with 33% (2013: 29%) of trade receivables relating to one major customer. 
The remaining trade receivables relate to a large and unrelated customer base. The directors believe no further increase 
is required in excess of the allowance for impairment.

note 9: other assets

Current

Prepayments

Non-Current

Deposits

Consolidated

2014 
$

2013 
$

24,602

24,524

59,099

59,099

AnnuAl RepoRt 2014 

43

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014note 10: plant anD equipment

Fixtures and equipment

At cost

Less: Accumulated depreciation

Total property, plant and equipment

Reconciliation

Consolidated

2014 
$

2013 
$

273,820

(244,372)

29,448

269,432

(342,203)

44,302

Reconciliation of the carrying amount of each class of property, plant and equipment is set out below:

Fixtures and equipment

Carrying amount at the beginning of the year

Additions

Depreciation expense

Carrying amount at the end of the year

note 11: intangible assets

Development expenditure

At cost

Less: Accumulated amortisation

Total development expenditure

Reconciliation

Reconciliation of the carrying amount of intangible assets is set out below:

Development expenditure

Carrying amount at the beginning of the year

Additions

Amortisation expense

Carrying amount at the end of the year

44,302

4,388

(19,242)

29,448

37,152

25,625

(18,475)

44,302

1,687,285

(124,003)

1,563,282

1,496,881

(34,677)

1,462,204

1,462,204

190,404

(89,326)

1,563,282

1,291,544

205,337

(34,677)

1,462,204

Development expenditure relates to costs incurred in developing MRI image analysis tools for the diagnosis and clinical 
management of human disease.

During  the  current  financial  year  this  development  has  related  to  a  new  liver  fat  assessment  tool,  further  refinement  of 
FerriScan® and the next stage of development of a MRI based liver fibrosis tool.

The recoupment of development expenditure is dependent on the successful development and commercialisation or sale 
of the technology developed. The directors are required to assess at each reporting date whether there is an indication 
that an asset may be impaired. If any such indication exists an estimate is made of the asset’s recoverable amount. Where 
the asset’s carrying value exceeds the estimated recoverable amount a provision for impairment is recognised. 

In  making  this  assessment  the  directors  had  regard  to  the  size  of  the  liver  fibrosis  and  liver  fat  markets,  competing 
products, experience gained with the FerriScan® technology, the likely period over which these revenues are expected to 
be generated and the likelihood of any technological obsolescence.

44 

ResonAnce heAlth limited

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014note 11: intangible assets (continueD)

The recoverable amount of development expenditure detailed above is determined based on value-in-use calculations.

Value-in-use is calculated based on the present value of cash flow projections over a five year period. The cash flows are 
discounted using the yield of a 10 year government bond at the beginning of the budget period.

The following assumptions were used in the value-in-use calculations:

 Growth rate was based on contractual obligations already in place and historical sales growth rates.

•	
•	 Costs are calculated taking into account historical margins and trends as well as estimated weighted average inflation 

rates over the period, which are consistent with inflation rates appropriate to historic company rates.

•	 Discount rate was based on the market risk free rate of a 10 year government bond.

note 12: available for sale investments

Available for sale-carried at fair value

Shares in listed corporations

Less: impairment

note 13: traDe anD other payables

Current

Trade payables (i)

Sundry creditors and accruals

Consolidated

2014 
$

2013 
$

14,337

(11,333)

3,004

136,618

323,811

460,429

14,337

(11,333)

3,004

256,494

151,491

407,985

 (i)  Trade  payables  are  non-interest  bearing  and  are  normally  settled  on  30  day  terms.  Information  regarding  the 

effective interest rate and credit risk of current payables is set out in Note 17.

note 14: other liabilities

Current

Unearned income

note 15: provisions

Current: Long service leave

Non-current: Long service leave

244,480

313,805

48,610

40,013

88,623

-

80,222

80,222

AnnuAl RepoRt 2014 

45

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014 
note 15: provisions (continueD)

Reconciliation

Balance at the beginning of the year

Balance at the beginning of the year

Arising during the year

Carrying amount at the end of the year

note 16: issueD capital

Consolidated

2014 
$

2013 
$

80,222

8,401

88,623

68,488

11,734

80,222

Consolidated

2014

2013

Number

$

Number

$

Issued Paid Up Capital

386,541,784

68,703,510

360,991,365

67,534,039

Ordinary shares entitle the holder to participate in dividends and the proceeds on winding up of the company in proportion 
to the number of and amounts paid on the shares held.

On a show of hands every holder of ordinary shares present at a meeting in person or by proxy, is entitled to one vote, 
and upon a poll each share is entitled to one vote.

Ordinary shares have no par value and the company does not have a limited amount of authorised capital.

Movements during the period

Ordinary shares

Number of shares

Issue Price $

Balance at the beginning of the financial year

360,991,365

67,534,039

Placement 17 April 2014 at $0.05 each

Rights issue 17 June 2014 at $0.05 each

Share capital issue costs

Balance at the end of the financial year

10,000,000

15,550,419

-

500,000

777,521

108,050)

386,541,784

68,703,510

46 

ResonAnce heAlth limited

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014note 17: financial instruments

(a) Capital risk management

The Group controls the capital of the Company in order to maintain an appropriate debt to equity ratio and to ensure that 
the Company can fund its operations and continue as a going concern. The Group’s overall strategy remains unchanged 
from  the  previous  financial  year.  The  capital  structure  of  the  Group  consists  of  cash  and  cash  equivalents  and  equity 
attributable  to  equity  holders  of  the  parent,  comprising  issued  capital,  reserves  and  retained  earnings.  None  of  the 
Group’s entities are subject to externally imposed capital requirements. Operating cash flows are used to maintain and 
expand operations, as well as to make routine expenditures.

(b) Categories of financial instruments

Financial assets/(liabilities)

Cash and cash equivalents

Loans and receivables

Available for sale financial assets

Other financial assets

Payables

Consolidated

2014 
$

2013 
$

2,097,607

499,399

3,004

59,099

(460,429)

1,092,943

388,631

3,004

59,099

407,985

The net fair values of all financial assets and liabilities approximate their carrying value.

(c) Financial risk management objectives

The Group is exposed to market risk (including currency risk, fair value interest rate risk and price risk), credit risk, liquidity 
risk and cash flow interest rate risk. The Group seeks to minimise the effects of these risks. The Group does not enter into 
or trade financial instruments, including derivative financial instruments, for speculative purposes.

(d) Market risk

The Group’s activities expose it primarily to the financial risk of changes in foreign currency exchange rates. There has 
been no change in the Group’s exposure to market risks or the manner in which it manages and measures the risk from 
the previous period.

AnnuAl RepoRt 2014 

47

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014note 17: financial instruments (continueD)

(e) Foreign currency risk management

The Group undertakes certain transactions denominated in foreign currencies, hence exposures to exchange rate fluctuations 
arise. Exchange rate exposures are managed within approved policy parameters. The Group does not engage in forward 
exchange contracts.

The carrying amount of the Group’s foreign currency denominated monetary assets and monetary liabilities at the reporting 
date is as follows:

United States Dollars

Great British Pounds

European Euros

Foreign currency sensitivity analysis

Liabilities

Assets

2014 
$

1,904

12,905

-

2013 
$

14,012

-

3,177

2014 
$

2013 
$

372,647

426,416

98,802

41,953

97,058

20,999

The Group is exposed to United States Dollar (USD), Great British Pound (GBP) and European Euro (EUR) currency fluctuations.

The  following  table  illustrates  the  Group’s  sensitivity  to  a  10%  increase  and  decrease  in  the  Australian  dollar  against  the 
relevant foreign currency. The sensitivity analysis includes only outstanding foreign currency denominated monetary items 
and adjusts their translation at the period end for a 10% change in foreign currency rates. A negative number indicates a 
decrease in profit and other equity where the Australian dollar strengthens against the respective currency. For a weakening 
of the Australian dollar against the respective currency there would be an equal and opposite impact on the profit and other 
equity and the balances below would be positive.

Profit or loss impact:

USD

GBP

EUR

2014 
$

2013 
$

(33,704)

(7,809)

(3,814)

(37,491)

(8,823)

(1,620)

48 

ResonAnce heAlth limited

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014note 17: financial instruments (continueD)

(f) Interest rate risk management

All financial assets and financial liabilities are non-interest bearing except for cash and cash equivalent balances. The following 
table details the Group’s expected maturities for cash and cash equivalent financial assets.

Cash and cash equivalent financial assets

2014

Less than
one month

One to three 
months

Total

$2,097,607

$59,099

$2,156,706

Weighted average effective interest rate

2.65%

3.42%

2013

$1,092,943

$59,099

$1,152,042

Weighted average effective interest rate

2.16%

4.57%

The Group is exposed to fluctuations in interest rates as it has deposited monies at floating and fixed interest rates.

The impact of a 10% change in interest rates will not have a material impact on the result for the year.

(g) Credit risk management

Credit risk is the risk that a counter party will not meet its obligations under a financial instrument or customer contract, leading 
to a financial loss. The Group is exposed to credit risk from its operating activities (primarily from customer receivables) and 
from its financing activities, including deposits with banks, foreign exchange transactions and other financial instruments.

Outstanding customer receivables are regularly monitored and any credit concerns highlighted to senior management. At 30 
June 2014, the Group had one customer that accounted for 33% of all trade receivables (2013: 29%).

The maximum exposure to credit risk, excluding the value of any collateral or other security at balance date in relation to each 
class  of  recognised  financial  assets  is  the  carrying  amount,  net  of  any  allowance  for  impairment  recorded  in  the  financial 
statements. The Group does not hold any collateral as security for any trade receivable.

(h) Equity price risk

TT  he  Group  is  exposed  to  equity  price  risks  arising  from  available-for-sale  financial  assets.  The  Group’s  investments  are 
publicly traded.

The impact of a 10% increase or decrease in the equity price will not have a material impact on the result for the year.

AnnuAl RepoRt 2014 

49

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014note 17: financial instruments (continueD)

(i) Liquidity risk management

Ultimate responsibility for liquidity risk management rests with the Board of directors, who have built an appropriate liquidity risk 
management framework for the management of the Group’s short, medium and long-term funding and liquidity management 
requirements.  The  Group  manages  liquidity  risk  by  maintaining  adequate  reserves  by  continually  monitoring  forecast  and 
actual cash flows and matching the maturity profiles of financial assets and liabilities. Included in Note 7 is a listing of additional 
undrawn facilities that the Group has at its disposal to further reduce liquidity risk.

The following table details the Group’s expected maturity for its financial liabilities.

2014

Non-interest bearing

2013

Non-interest bearing

(i) Liquidity risk management

Less than
one month

One to three 
months

Three months
to one year

Total

227,613

127,509

105,306

460,429

236,412

42,960

128,613

407,985

The net fair value of all financial assets and liabilities approximate their carrying values. No financial assets or financial liabilities, 
except for listed shares are readily traded on organized markets in standardised form.

The aggregate net fair values and carrying amounts of all financial assets and liabilities are disclosed in the financial statements.

note 18: commitments for expenDiture

Operating lease commitments

Commitments for minimum lease payments in relation to non-
cancellable operating leases for office premises are payable as follows:

Within one year

Later than 1 year but no later than 5 years

Total commitments not recognised in the financial statements

2014 
$

2013 
$

106,173

255,386

361,559

113,922

9,501

123,423

A lease over premises was entered into effective 1 August 2011 and has been extended from 1 August 2014 for a further 3 
years to July 2017.

50 

ResonAnce heAlth limited

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014note 19: relateD party Disclosure

The consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of Resonance Health Limited and the subsidiaries listed 
in the following table.

Name of entity 

Country of incorporation  Class of shares 

Equity holding

Resonance Health Analysis Services Pty Ltd

WA Private Health Care Services Pty Ltd

IVB Holdings Pty Ltd

Resonance USA Inc 

Australia

Australia

Australia

Australia

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

Ordinary

100%

100%

100%

100%

Resonance Health Limited is the ultimate Australian entity and ultimate parent of the Group.

Transactions with related parties

Transactions with related parties are on normal commercial terms and conditions no more favourable than those available to 
other parties unless otherwise stated.

Transactions with key management personnel

Refer to Note 23 for details of transactions with key management personnel.

During the year Resonance Health Analysis Services Pty Ltd repaid interest free loans to the Company totalling $356,000.

During the year the Company provided additional interest free loans to Resonance Health Analysis Services Pty Ltd  
totalling $200,000.

During the year the Company provided additional interest free loans to Resonance USA Inc. totalling US$90,500 (2013: $200,000).

A cumulative impairment of these loans of $4,176,719 was recorded up to balance date (2013: $4,545,135).

During the year expenses were paid by Resonance Health Analysis Services Pty Ltd totalling $243,495 (2013: $145,848) on 
behalf of the Company.

During the year expenses were paid by the Company on behalf of Resonance Health Analysis Services Pty Ltd totalling $43,146 
(2013: $193,789).

AnnuAl RepoRt 2014 

51

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014note 20: parent entity Disclosures

Financial Position

Assets

Current assets

Non-current assets

Total assets

Liabilities

Current liabilities

Total liabilities

Equity

Issued capital

Option reserve

Accumulated losses

Total equity

Financial Performance

Loss for the year

Other comprehensive income

Total comprehensive loss

2014 
$

2013 
$

1,718,326

1,048,591

2,766,917

238,486

238,486

645,467

1,015,346

1,660,813

94,122

94,122

68,703,510

66,284

67,534,039

66,284

(66,241,363)

(66,033,632)

2,528,431

1,566,691

Year ended  
30 June 2014 
$

Year ended  
30 June 2013 
$

(207,731)

-

(207,731)

(584,016)

-

(584,016)

note 21: events subsequent to reporting Date

On 12 September 2014 as part of the Shortfall Entitlement, the Company placed 13 million shares at $0.05 per share which raised 
a further cash amount of $650,000.

note 22: auDitors’ remuneration

During the year the following fees were paid or payable to the auditor:

Remuneration of the auditor of the Company for:

Auditing/reviewing financial report

Taxation compliance services

Consolidated

2014 
$

2013 
$

49,950

37,750

87,700

48,895

45,400

94,295

52 

ResonAnce heAlth limited

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014note 23: key management personnel Disclosures

(a) Details of key management personnel

 (i) Directors

Dr Martin Blake  

Chairman (non-executive)

Ms Liza Dunne  

Managing Director (executive)

Mr Simon Panton  

Director (non-executive)

Dr Jason Loveridge  

Director (non-executive)

Dr Tim St Pierre  

Director (executive)

 (ii) Executives

Mrs Naomi Haydari  

 Chief Financial Officer and Company Secretary 
on maternity leave effective 28th November 2013.

Key management personnel remuneration has been included in the Remuneration Report section of the Directors’ Report.

(b) Key Management Personnel Compensation

Refer to the Remuneration Report contained in the Directors’ Report for details of the remuneration paid or payable to each 
member of the Group’s key management personnel (KMP) for the year ended 30 June 2014.

The totals paid to KMP of the Company and the Group during the year are as follows:

Short term employee benefits

Post employment benefits

Share based payments

Total KMP compensation

2014 
$

2013 
$

503,910

35,205

-

539,115

520,729

37,232

-

557,961

AnnuAl RepoRt 2014 

53

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1.  

In the opinion of the directors:

a.  the accompanying financial statements, notes and the additional disclosures are in accordance with the 

Corporations Act 2001 including:

i.   giving a true and fair view of the Group’s financial position as at 30 June 2014 and of its performance for 

the year then ended; and

ii.  complying with Australian Accounting Standards (including the Australian Accounting Interpretations) 

and the Corporations Regulations 2001; and

b.  there are reasonable grounds to believe that the Company will be able to pay its debts as and when they 

become due and payable; and

c.  the financial statements and notes thereto are in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards 

issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.

2.   This declaration has been made after receiving the declarations required to be made to the directors in accordance 
with Section 295A of the Corporations Act 2001 for the financial year ended 30 June 2014.

This declaration is signed in accordance with a resolution of the Board of Directors.

Dr Martin Blake
Chairman

Place: Perth, Western Australia
Dated: 26 September 2014

54 

ResonAnce heAlth limited

DIRECTORS’ DECLARATION 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
-53-  

RESONANCE HEALTH LIMITED 

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT 
To the members of Resonance Health Limited 

Report on the Financial Report 

We have audited the accompanying financial report of Resonance Health Limited (“the company”), which comprises the 
consolidated statement of financial position as at 30 June 2014, the consolidated statement of comprehensive income, 
the consolidated statement of changes in equity and the consolidated statement of cash flows for the year then ended, 
notes  comprising  a  summary  of  significant  accounting  policies  and  other  explanatory  information,  and  the  directors’ 
declaration for the Group. The Group comprises the company and the entities it controlled at the year’s end or from time 
to time during the financial year. 

Directors’ responsibility for the financial report  

The directors of the company are responsible for the preparation of the financial report that gives a true and fair view in 
accordance  with  Australian  Accounting  Standards  and  the  Corporations  Act  2001  and  for  such  internal  control  as  the 
directors determine is necessary to enable the preparation of the financial report that is free from material misstatement, 
whether due to fraud or error.  

In  Note  1(c),  the  directors  also  state,  in  accordance  with  Accounting  Standard  AASB  101:  Presentation  of  Financial 
Statements, that the financial report complies with International Financial Reporting Standards. 

Auditor’s responsibility  

Our  responsibility  is  to  express  an  opinion  on  the  financial  report  based  on  our  audit.  We  conducted  our  audit  in 
accordance  with  Australian  Auditing  Standards.  Those  standards  require  that  we  comply  with  relevant  ethical 
requirements relating to audit engagements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the 
financial report is free from material misstatement.  

An  audit  involves  performing  procedures  to  obtain  audit  evidence  about  the  amounts  and  disclosures  in  the  financial 
report.  The  procedures  selected  depend  on  the  auditor’s  judgement,  including  the  assessment  of  the  risks  of  material 
misstatement  of  the  financial  report,  whether  due  to  fraud  or  error.  In  making  those  risk  assessments,  the  auditor 
considers internal control relevant to the company’s preparation  and fair  presentation of the financial report in order to 
design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on 
the  effectiveness  of  internal  control.  An  audit  also  includes  evaluating  the  appropriateness  of  accounting  policies  used 
and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by the directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of 
the financial report.  

Our audit did not involve an analysis of the prudence of business decisions made by directors or management. 

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.  

Independence 

In conducting our audit, we have complied with the independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001.  

Level 4, 130 Stirling Street Perth WA 6000.  PO Box 8124 Perth BC 6849 Telephone +61 (08) 9227 7500. Fax +61 (08) 9227 7533. 

Email: hlb@hlbwa.com.au.  Website: http://www.hlb.com.au 

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation 

HLB Mann Judd (WA Partnership) is a member of 

 International, a worldwide organisation of accounting firms and business advisers. 

AnnuAl RepoRt 2014 

55

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
-54-  

RESONANCE HEALTH LIMITED 

Auditor’s opinion  

In our opinion:  

(a) 

(b) 

the financial report of Resonance Health Limited is in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, including:  
(i) 

giving a true and fair view of the Group’s financial position as at 30 June 2014 and of its performance for 
the year ended on that date; and  
complying with Australian Accounting Standards and the Corporations Regulations 2001; and  
(ii) 
the financial report also complies with International Financial Reporting Standards as disclosed in Note 1(c).  

Report on the Remuneration Report 

We have audited the remuneration report included in the directors’ report for the year ended 30 June 2014. The directors 
of  the  company  are  responsible  for  the  preparation  and  presentation  of  the  remuneration  report  in  accordance  with 
section 300A of the Corporations Act 2001. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the remuneration report, based 
on our audit conducted in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards.  

Auditor’s opinion  

In  our  opinion  the  remuneration  report  of  Resonance  Health  Limited  for  the  year  ended  30  June  2014  complies  with 
section 300A of the Corporations Act 2001.  

HLB Mann Judd 
Chartered Accountants  

L Di Giallonardo 
Partner  

Perth, Western Australia 
26 September 2014 

56 

ResonAnce heAlth limited

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
aDDitional information for listeD public companies

The following additional information is disclosed in accordance with Section 4.10 of the Australian Stock Exchange Ltd 
Listing rules in respect of listed public companies only.

The following additional information is supplied as at October 2014.

1. Analysis of Shareholdings

Distribution of Shareholders (ASX Code: RHT) 
Number of Ordinary Shares Held

Ordinary Shares

Number of holders Number of shares

1 – 1,000

1,001 – 5,000

5,001 – 10,000

10,001 – 100,000

100,001 – and over

536

180

241

847

397

2,201

115,926

554,231

1,796,766

34,034,376

364,701,268

401,202,567

The number of shareholdings holding less than a marketable parcel of shares are 893.

2. Voting Rights 

Ordinary shares - each ordinary share is entitled to one vote when a poll is called, otherwise each member present at a 
meeting or by proxy has one vote on a show of hands.

AnnuAl RepoRt 2014 

57

ShareholderS 
  
 
  
 
3. Twenty Largest Shareholders of quoted Ordinary Shares

Name

Southam Investments 2003 Pty Ltd 

HSBC CUSTODY NOMINEES (AUSTRALIA) LIMITED

Number of 
Ordinary 
Shares

65,414,622

16,557,577

Mr Kevin Deeves and Mrs Pauline Deeves 

10,650,000

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Mr Sean Watkins-Saxon 

Timothy Guy St Pierre 

The University Of Western Australia

Mr Gregory Peter Wilson

8 Wanida Chau-Anusorn 

9

Mr Helmut Rocker

10 Mr Harry Basle

11 Mr Robert Panton

12 Walker Trusco Pty Ltd

13 MC Manangement Group Pty Ltd

14 Mr William Grove

15 Dr Martin Peter Blake

16 Mr Maximino Amoedo

17 ABN Amro Clearing Sydney Nominees Pty Ltd

18 Marcolongo Nominees Pty Ltd 

19 Anahein Pty Ltd

20 Mr Bruce Stevenson

4.  Substantial shareholders 

Percentage 
of Total

16.30

4.12

2.66

2.36

2.28

2.26

2.00

1.68

1.54

1.25

1.16

1.12

1.04

1.01

0.95

0.82

0.81

0.78

0.75

0.74

9,488,636

9,146,250

9,078,750

8,055,000

6,730,000

6,200,000

5,022,422

4,640,824

4,494,844

4,159,203

4,068,401

3,798,590

3,300,000

3,242,803

3,126,000

3,010,598

2,960,404

183,144,924

45.63

The names of substantial shareholders who have notified the Company in accordance with sections 709 and 710 of the 
Corporations Act 2001 are:

Southam Investments 2003 Pty Ltd  

        65,414,622    ordinary shares

58 

ResonAnce heAlth limited

ShareholderS  
 
  
  
 
  
  
 
AnnuAl RepoRt 2014 

59

Principal Place of Business 
Ground Floor  
278 Stirling Highway, Claremont WA 6010
Telephone: +61 8 9286 5300 | Facsimile: +61 9286 1179

Postal Address
PO Box 1135, Nedlands WA 6909

www.resonancehealth.com 
info@ferriscan.com