Annual Reports and
Financial Statements
2011
A
n
n
u
a
l
i
R
e
p
o
r
t
s
a
n
d
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
2
0
1
1
www.reedelsevier.com
1441_Reed_Covers_Final.indd 18
08/03/2012 18:32
Reed Elsevier is a world leading provider
of professional information solutions.
We leverage deep customer understanding to
deliver demonstrably improved outcomes to our
professional customers.
We do this by combining content and data with
analytics and technology in global platforms,
sharing institutional skills, assets and resources
across Reed Elsevier.
Contents
1
7
Overview
1 Chairman’s statement
2
4
2011 highlights
Chief Executive Officer’s
report
Business review
8 Reed Elsevier
10 Elsevier
14 LexisNexis Risk Solutions
LexisNexis Legal &
18
Professional
22 Reed Exhibitions
26
29 Corporate responsibility
Reed Business Information
39 Financial review
83
40
Chief Financial Officer’s
report
48 Principal risks
51 Governance
52 Board Directors
54
Chairman’s introduction
to corporate governance
Structure and corporate
governance
Report of the Nominations
Committee
Directors’ remuneration
report
Report of the Audit
Committees
55
62
63
80
Financial statements and
other information
84
Combined financial
statements
123 Summary combined financial
information in euros
137 Reed Elsevier PLC Annual
Report and Financial
Statements
161 Reed Elsevier NV Annual
Report and Financial
Statements
185 Additional information
for US investors
190 Shareholder information
194 Principal operating locations
Full report online
ThE REED ELSEVIER ANNUAL REPORTS AND FINANCIAL STATEmENTS 2011 ARE AVAILABLE TO VIEw ONLINE:
REPORTING.REEdElsEvIER.cOm/aR11
Forward looking statements
The Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011 contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of
the US Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the US Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These statements are
subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results or outcomes to differ materially from those currently being
anticipated. The terms “estimate”, “project”, “plan”, “intend”, “expect”, “should be”, “will be”, “believe” and similar expressions identify
forward-looking statements. Factors which may cause future outcomes to differ from those foreseen in forward-looking statements
include, but are not limited to competitive factors in the industries in which Reed Elsevier operates; demand for Reed Elsevier’s products
and services; exchange rate fluctuations; general economic and business conditions; legislative, fiscal, tax and regulatory developments
and political risks; the availability of third party content and data; breaches of our data security systems and interruptions in our information
technology systems; changes in law and legal interpretations affecting Reed Elsevier’s intellectual property rights and other risks
referenced from time to time in the filings of Reed Elsevier with the US Securities and Exchange Commission.
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
1
Chairman’s statement
Balance Sheet
We achieved strong cash generation in the year and paid out
approximately half of our free cash flow to shareholders as
dividends. The remaining free cash flow was used to fund
acquisitions made during the year, principally Accuity, CBI China
and Ascend, with year end net debt of $5.3 billion, compared to
$5.4 billion in the prior year.
Management and Boards
Following the reshaping of management in the business areas,
Erik has focused in the past 12 months on refreshing the central
functions with the appointment of Group General Counsel,
dedicated heads of Investor Relations and Corporate M&A and
new heads of Group Strategy, Business Analytics and Corporate
Communications, as he continues to build his team to take the
business forward.
In October, we announced that Mark Armour, Chief Financial
Officer, has decided to retire from the Boards of Reed Elsevier
at the end of 2012. The Nominations Committee has begun the
process of identifying his successor and has appointed an
executive search firm to review both internal and external
candidates. In the meantime Mark remains a key member of
the executive team.
In April, Adrian Hennah was appointed as a non-executive
member of our Boards following the approval by shareholders.
Adrian succeeded Lord Sharman, who stepped down at the Annual
General Meetings after nine years of valuable board service.
I am pleased to say that David Brennan will join our Boards as a
non-executive director with effect from 1 November 2012, subject
to shareholder approval at the Annual General Meetings in April.
David is currently Chief Executive Officer of AstraZeneca plc, a
global pharmaceutical company, which develops, manufactures
and markets prescription medicines and medical devices. As a
truly international executive with deep knowledge both of medical
research and of the world’s healthcare markets, he will bring
highly relevant experience to our board discussions.
Morris Tabaksblat
Sadly in October, our former Chairman, Morris Tabaksblat passed
away. Morris was Chairman of the Boards of Reed Elsevier from
1999-2005. He was much respected by all who knew and worked
with him and was a hugely influential figure in the successful
development of Reed Elsevier.
Corporate Responsibility
Our unique corporate social responsibility programmes are a
source of strength for Reed Elsevier. I fully support all our efforts
to ensure we achieve the highest levels of corporate responsibility
and ethical management. In the year, we pledged to increase the
percentage of women on the Reed Elsevier Boards by 2015 and
will make every effort to do so.
Anthony Habgood
Chairman
Reed Elsevier continued its
positive momentum in 2011.
All five business areas contributed
to underlying revenue growth
with underlying operating profits
growing well.
We delivered a good increase in earnings per share. Our cash flow
generation has allowed us to invest in our businesses, while
maintaining a strong balance sheet and we are recommending a
6% increase in the full year dividend. I am confident that our
actions will continue to strengthen our long term growth
prospects.
Underlying revenues, which exclude the effects of currency
translation and acquisitions and disposals, were up 2%, or 3%
excluding the cycling effect of biennial exhibitions, reflecting a
consistent performance from our subscription and online data
businesses. Our reported revenues were down 1% at £6,002m
expressed in sterling and down by 3% to €6,902m expressed in
euros, or flat in constant currencies.
Adjusted operating profits were up 5% at £1,626m in sterling
and up 3% at €1,870m in euros, or up 4% at constant currencies.
Adjusted earnings per share were up 8% for Reed Elsevier PLC
at 46.7p and 6% higher for Reed Elsevier NV at €0.83, up 6% at
constant currencies. Reported earnings per share for Reed
Elsevier PLC were up 19% at 32.4p and for Reed Elsevier NV
up 16% at €0.59.
Dividends
The Boards are recommending equalised final dividends of
15.90p for Reed Elsevier PLC and €0.326 for Reed Elsevier NV,
up respectively 6% and 8% against the prior year. This brings the
total for the year to 21.55p for Reed Elsevier PLC and €0.436 for
Reed Elsevier NV, both showing an increase of 6%. The differing
growth rates of the interim and final dividends for the two parent
companies reflect movements in the sterling-euro exchange rate
between dividend announcement dates.
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
2
OvERviEw
REED ELSEVIER
2011 highlights
Underlying revenue up 2% (3% excluding biennial exhibition cycling)
Underlying adjusted operating profit up 5%; up 4% at constant currencies
Adjusted EPS up 8% to 46.7p for Reed Elsevier PLC; up 6% to €0.83 for Reed Elsevier NV
Reported EPS up 19% to 32.4p for Reed Elsevier PLC; up 16% to €0.59 for Reed Elsevier NV
Full year dividend up 6% to 21.55p for Reed Elsevier PLC and €0.436 for Reed Elsevier NV
Net debt of £3.4bn; 2.3 times adjusted EBITDA (pensions and lease adjusted)
Reed Elsevier combined businesses
REvENUE
ADJUSTED OPERATiNG PROFiT
£m
€m
£m
€m
Underlying Growth +2%
Underlying Growth +5%
6,055
6,002
7,084
6,902
1,555
1,626
1,819
1,870
2010
2011
2010
2011
2010
2011
2010
2011
Parent companies
REED ElSEviER PlC
Adjusted EPS
pence
Dividend
pence
Growth +8%
Growth +6%
43.4
46.7
20.40
21.55
REED ElSEviER Nv
Adjusted EPS
€
Growth +6%
0.78
0.83
Dividend
€
Growth +6%
0.412
0.436
2010
2011
2010
2011
2010
2011
2010
2011
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
3
Reed Elsevier combined businesses
REPORTED FiGURES
For the year ended 31 December
Revenue
Operating profit
Profit before tax
Net profit
Net borrowings
ADJUSTED FiGURES
For the year ended 31 December
Operating profit
Operating margin
Profit before tax
Net profit
Operating cash flow
Operating cash flow conversion
Return on invested capital
Parent companies
Adjusted earnings per share
Reported earnings per share
Ordinary dividend per share
2011
£m
6,002
1,205
948
760
3,433
2011
£m
1,626
27.1%
1,391
1,060
1,515
93%
11.2%
£
2010
£m
6,055
1,090
768
642
3,455
£
2010
£m
Change
–1%
+11%
+23%
+18%
Change
1,555
+5%
25.7% +1.4% pts
+9%
1,279
+8%
983
0%
1,519
98%
10.6% +0.6% pts
2011
€m
6,902
1,386
1,090
874
4,119
2011
€m
1,870
27.1%
1,600
1,219
1,742
93%
11.2%
€
2010
€m
7,084
1,275
898
751
4,043
€
2010
€m
Change at
constant
currencies
0%
+8%
+20%
+15%
Change
-3%
+9%
+21%
+16%
Change at
constant
currencies
Change
+3%
1,819
25.7% +1.4% pts
+7%
1,496
+6%
1,150
-2%
1,777
98%
10.6% +0.6% pts
+4%
+7%
+6%
-1%
Change
underlying
+2%
Change
underlying
+5%
Reed Elsevier PlC
Reed Elsevier Nv
2011
2010
Change
2011
2010
Change
46.7p
32.4p
21.55p
43.4p
27.3p
20.40p
+8%
+19%
+6%
€0.83
€0.59
€0.436
€0.78
€0.51
€0.412
+6%
+16%
+6%
Change at
constant
currencies
+6%
The Reed Elsevier combined businesses encompass the businesses of Reed Elsevier Group plc and Elsevier Reed Finance BV, together
with their two parent companies, Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV (the “Reed Elsevier combined businesses”). The results of
Reed Elsevier PLC reflect its shareholders’ 52.9% economic interest in the Reed Elsevier combined businesses. The results of Reed
Elsevier NV reflect its shareholders’ 50% economic interest in the Reed Elsevier combined businesses. The respective economic
interests of the Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV shareholders take account of Reed Elsevier PLC’s 5.8% indirect interest
in Reed Elsevier NV.
Adjusted and underlying figures are additional performance measures used by management and are reconciled to the reported figures
in note 10 to the combined financial statements and note 9 to the respective parent company financial statements. Underlying growth
rates are calculated at constant currencies, and exclude the results of all acquisitions and disposals made both in the year and prior year
and assets held for sale. Constant currency growth rates are based on 2010 full year average and hedge exchange rates.
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
4
OvERviEw
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S REPORT
Chief Executive Officer’s report
Organic development remains at the core of our strategy, and
in 2011 we increased our investment and accelerated new product
launches, focusing on the provision of information solutions that
demonstrably improve the economics of our professional and
business customers. The increasing profitability of our business
reflects a combination of our global operating approach,
aiming to keep cost growth below revenue growth, and
portfolio development.
We operate in an environment where global professional
employment will grow across industries, information sources
and data volumes are multiplying, and the use of technology is
evolving. Our aim is to be a business that sells improved
outcomes for our professional customers in information
intensive industries, both as individuals and for the institutions
or businesses that they work for.
We want to deliver demonstrably improved outcomes to those
customers, helping them to make better decisions, achieve
better results, and be more productive.
We want to do this with tools that leverage deep customer
understanding, combining high quality content and data with
analytics and technology to build solutions that typically cost less
than 1% of our customers’ total cost base but can have a significant
positive impact on the remaining 99%.
We want to move towards this business type across all of Reed
Elsevier, building leading positions in long term global growth
markets, primarily through organic investment.
We will do this by leveraging our institutional skills, assets and
resources across the business to build solutions for our
customers and pursue cost efficiencies within our own business.
During the course of 2011, we have made significant progress
against our strategic priorities. We have continued to migrate the
business towards online solutions, with just over 20% of revenues
now still in print, down from over 50% five years ago.
Our geographic footprint is also evolving, with 17% of revenues
now generated outside North America and Europe, up from
12% five years ago.
We have actively developed the portfolio in the year with
expansion of online data services and the exit from small
businesses that are no longer aligned with our strategic
direction in all five business areas.
Erik Engstrom, Chief Executive Officer
2011 was a year of good progress
both strategically and financially.
Our large subscription and data
businesses performed well and
uncertainty in the macro economic
environment in the latter part of
the year had only a limited impact
on some of our more cyclical
businesses.
FORMAT TRANSiTiON
GEOGRAPHiC EvOlUTiON
2006
2011
Percent of revenues outside North America and Europe
Electronic
37%
Print
22%
17%
12%
Print
51%
Face to face
15%
Face to face
12%
Electronic
63%
2006
2011
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
5
Financial results
On an underlying basis revenues grew 2% in 2011, but excluding
the negative impact of biennial event cycling in Reed Exhibitions,
underlying revenues grew 3%, compared to 1% in 2010, with
all five business areas returning to growth for the first time
since 2007.
Underlying adjusted operating profit grew 5% reflecting the
improved revenue growth in the businesses, a continued focus
on operational efficiency, and the disposal of lower margin
businesses.
Despite increasing organic investment in our business and the
completion of a number of acquisitions, we improved our return
on invested capital by 60 basis points to 11.2% for the year.
We have also taken our net debt to EBITDA ratio back down into
a range that we are very comfortable with, ending the year at
2.3x on a pension and lease adjusted basis.
Business area priorities
In Elsevier, our priorities are to improve research outcomes
and productivity for researchers and their managers through
expanded content and integrated analytics & technology
platforms, to drive remaining print to electronic migration in
health sciences leveraging global platforms, and to relentlessly
pursue process innovation and efficiency through global
shared services.
We made good progress on these priorities in 2011, with our
author, editor and reviewer satisfaction and loyalty scores
reaching all time highs, double digit growth in article submissions,
and continued growth in citation share. We also expanded our
global platforms for both science and health content. Science
& Technology reported underlying revenue growth of 4% in 2011,
with good growth in research and databases. In Health Sciences
revenues were flat, with double digit growth in electronic
revenues across all segments offset by declines in print book
sales to individuals and pharma promotion.
In lexisNexis Risk Solutions, our priorities are to drive growth
in insurance through an active new product pipeline that improves
carrier economics across their workflows and to leverage our
leading database and technology platform to expand into adjacent
risk markets and new geographies.
In 2011 we achieved good growth in insurance data & analytics and
business services reflecting solid demand for our core products
and increasing adoption of new products, and we have just brought
on our first commercial UK insurance customer. Screening
revenues slowed in the second half reflecting US hiring trends,
and federal government markets remained under pressure.
Underlying revenues were up 4% and adjusted operating profits
up 12% reflecting cost savings, notably in technology, and from the
successful completion of the ChoicePoint integration.
In lexisNexis legal & Professional our priorities are to
progressively introduce the next generation legal products,
to leverage the new platform globally in order to drive print
to electronic migration and long term international growth,
and to upgrade our operational infrastructure and gradually
rebuild margins.
In 2011 we launched the second release of Lexis Advance in the
US and expanded our international solutions. Revenues returned
to slight underlying growth in both the US and internationally,
with growth in research and litigation tools and in practice
management, and moderating declines in news & business
to corporate customers and in electronic listings. Margins were
broadly flat, as expected.
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
UNDERlYiNG REvENUE GROwTH EXClUDiNG BiENNiAl CYCliNG
UNDERlYiNG ADJUSTED OPERATiNG PROFiT GROwTH
+6%
+4%
+3%
+1%
+10%
+9%
+5%
-1%
2007
2008
-5%
2009
2010
2011
2007
2008
-9%
2009
2010
2011
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
6
OvERviEw
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S REPORT
At Reed Exhibitions our priorities are to drive organic growth by
leveraging global sector groups and technology platforms and
to prioritise faster growing geographies and sectors through
launches and small acquisitions.
In 2011 we rolled out our Nova web platform to the vast majority
of our shows. During the year we launched 43 new shows, and
completed a number of small acquisitions. Underlying revenue
growth was 10% excluding biennial cycling, with good growth
across all geographies in 2011. The net cycling out of biennial
shows held back overall growth in 2011 with underlying revenues
and adjusted operating profits flat and up 2% respectively.
In Reed Business information our priorities are to drive expansion
in global data services organically and through acquisition, to
reshape the portfolio through organic transformation and
selective disposals, and to continue to realign the cost base.
In 2011 we built out data services organically and acquired Accuity
and CBI China, we transformed one of our leading brands with the
combination of Flight with Ascend, and we divested a number of
magazines and service operations. We returned to underlying
revenue growth of 1% for the year, and adjusted operating profits
were up 15%, with the majority of the margin increase reflecting
organic development, supported by our exits from low margin
businesses.
Corporate responsibility
We continue to prioritise and make progress against our corporate
responsibility objectives, beginning with the unique contributions
we make as a business, including sustainable access to
information. We are also focused on good management of the
material issues affecting all companies in areas ranging from
governance and community to supply chain and the environment.
Outlook
The macro economic outlook remains uncertain, but by delivering
highly valued products and services to our professional
customers, and a relentless focus on process efficiency, we
expect to deliver another year of underlying revenue and profit
growth in 2012.
I am confident that we have both the management team and
institutional skills to address the opportunities that our
professional end markets offer us and to face the challenges that
today’s macro economic environment present. We have extensive
insight into our customers’ needs and are focused on delivering
the content and solutions that create value for them and
significantly improve their outcomes and economics. Our
employees show unrivalled commitment to achieving these
goals and I would like to thank them for their continued
enthusiasm and dedication to our customers and to creating
increasing value for Reed Elsevier and our shareholders.
The business and financial reviews, set out in pages 7 to 28
describe in more detail our markets, businesses and the
performance and outlook by business.
Erik Engstrom
Chief Executive Officer
RETURN ON iNvESTED CAPiTAl
NET DEBT/EBiTDA
11.8%
12.1%
10.4%
10.6%
11.2%
3.3x
2.9x
2.2x
2.5x
2.3x
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Pension and lease adjusted; calculated in US dollars; 2007 pro forma
for special distribution; 2008 pro forma for ChoicePoint acquisition
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
7
Business
review
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
In this section
Reed Elsevier
8
10 Elsevier
14 LexisNexis Risk Solutions
18 LexisNexis Legal & Professional
22 Reed Exhibitions
26 Reed Business Information
29 Corporate responsibility
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
8
BUSINESS REVIEW
REED ELSEVIER
Reed Elsevier
Reed Elsevier is a world leading provider of professional information
solutions. We leverage deep customer understanding to deliver
demonstrably improved outcomes to our professional customers.
We do this by combining content and data with analytics and technology
in global platforms, sharing institutional skills, assets and resources
across Reed Elsevier.
We aim to build leading positions in long term global growth markets.
Our customer facing activities are grouped into five business areas:
Risk Solutions
Legal & Professional
Elsevier’s scientific and medical information
and tools help its customers improve outcomes
in science and health.
LexisNexis Risk Solutions provides data and
analytics that enable its customers to evaluate
and manage risks associated with transactions
and improve performance.
LexisNexis Legal & Professional provides legal,
tax, regulatory and news & business information
and analysis to legal, corporate, government,
accounting and academic markets.
Reed Exhibitions is the world’s largest events
business, with over 475 events in 34 countries.
Reed Business Information is a provider of data
services, business information and marketing
solutions to business professionals.
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
9
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
Revenue
Elsevier
LexisNexis Risk Solutions
LexisNexis Legal & Professional
Reed Exhibitions
Reed Business Information
Adjusted operating profit
Elsevier
LexisNexis Risk Solutions
LexisNexis Legal & Professional
Reed Exhibitions
Reed Business Information
Unallocated items
2011
£m
2,058
908
1,634
707
695
6,002
768
362
229
167
110
(10)
1,626
2010
£m
2,026
927
1,691
693
718
6,055
724
354
238
158
89
(8)
1,555
Change
Change at constant
currencies
Change
underlying
+2%
–2%
–3%
+2%
–3%
–1%
+6%
+2%
–4%
+6%
+23%
+5%
+1%
+1%
–2%
+1%
–4%
0%
+3%
+6%
–4%
+4%
+22%
+4%
+2%
+4%
+1%
0%
+1%
+2%
+4%
+12%
–2%
+2%
+15%
+5%
Adjusted operating profit is presented as an additional performance measure used by management and is stated before amortisation and impairment of acquired intangible
assets and goodwill, exceptional restructuring (none in 2011) and acquisition related costs, disposal gains and losses and other non operating items, related tax effects and
movements in deferred taxation assets and liabilities that are not expected to crystallise in the near term and include the benefit of tax amortisation where available on
acquired goodwill and intangibles assets. Adjusted operating profit is also grossed up to exclude the equity share of taxes in joint ventures. Reconciliations between the
reported and adjusted figures are provided in note 10 to the combined financial statements. Underlying growth rates are calculated at constant currencies and exclude the
results of all acquisitions and disposals made both in the year and prior year and assets held for sale. Constant currency growth rates are based on 2010 full year exchange
and hedge exchange rates.
REVENUE
£6,002m
12%
12%
34%
AdjUStEd oPERAtINg PRofIt
£1,626m
7%
10%
14%
47%
Elsevier
LexisNexis Risk
Solutions
LexisNexis Legal &
Professional
Reed Exhibitions
Reed Business
Information
27%
15%
22%
REVENUE By foRmAt
REVENUE By gEogRAPhIc mARkEt
£6,002m
22%
15%
£6,002m
17%
Electronic
Face to face
Print
63%
18%
54%
3%
8%
Elsevier
LexisNexis Risk
Solutions
LexisNexis Legal &
Professional
Reed Exhibitions
Reed Business
Information
North America
UK
Netherlands
Rest of Europe
Rest of World
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
10
BUSINESS REVIEW
ELSEVIER
Elsevier’s scientific and medical
information and tools help its
customers improve outcomes in
science and health.
Elsevier is the world’s leading provider of scientific and medical
information and serves scientists, health professionals and
students worldwide. Its objective is to help its customers
advance science and improve healthcare by providing world
class information and innovative solutions that enable
customers to make critical decisions, enhance productivity
and improve outcomes.
Total revenues for the year ended 31 December 2011 were
£2,058m. Elsevier is a global business with principal operations
in Amsterdam, Beijing, Boston, Chennai, Delhi, London, Madrid,
Milan, Munich, New York, Oxford, Paris, Philadelphia, Rio de
Janeiro, St. Louis, San Diego, Singapore and Tokyo. Elsevier
has 6,900 employees.
Elsevier is organised around two market-facing businesses:
Science & Technology, which serves the scientific and technology
communities, and Health Sciences, which serves the health
community. Both of these businesses are supported by a global
shared services organisation which provides integrated editorial
systems and production services, product platforms, distribution,
and other support functions.
Science & technology is the world’s leading scientific information
provider. It delivers a wide array of information and workflow
tools that help researchers generate valuable insights in the
advancement of scientific discovery and improve the productivity
of research. Its customers are scientists, academic institutions,
research leaders and administrators, corporations and
governments which rely on Elsevier to: provide high quality
content; review, publish, disseminate and preserve research
findings; and create innovative tools to help focus research
strategies and improve their effectiveness.
Elsevier publishes over 240,000 new science & technology
research articles each year through some 1,250 journals,
many of which are the foremost publications in their field and a
primary point of reference for new research. The vast majority
of customers receive these journals through ScienceDirect,
the world’s largest database of scientific and medical research,
providing access to over 10 million scientific and medical journal
articles, used by over 7 million researchers each year.
Elsevier also publishes over 700 new English language science
& technology book titles annually, supporting bibliographic data,
indexes and abstracts, and review and reference works. 15,000
online books are available on ScienceDirect, with over 1,000 online
books added each year.
Other major products include Scopus and Reaxys. Scopus is the
largest abstract and citation database of research literature in the
world, with abstracts and bibliographic information on more than
45 million scientific research articles from 19,000 peer reviewed
journals and 5,000 international publishers. Scopus also has data
on more than 24 million patents. Reaxys is a leading solution for
synthetic chemists that integrates chemical reaction and
compound data searching with synthesis planning.
In December 2011, Elsevier acquired Ariadne Genomics a provider
of pathway analysis tools and semantic technologies for life
science researchers which will complement Elsevier’s efforts
to serve the needs of researchers in the pharma biotech sector.
A major challenge facing researchers and institutions is the ever
growing amount of research and related information with limited
time to identify and analyse what is most relevant. To address this
challenge, Elsevier has been developing a suite of new products
that significantly improve the speed at which researchers are able
to find the most relevant information and analyse this information
using the most innovative applications. SciVerse Hub provides a
The SciVerse platform combines content from
Elsevier products with a new discovery hub
and community developed applications
Science Direct is the world’s largest database
of scientific and medical research articles
One of the world’s leading medical journals
since 1823
Scopus is the world’s largest scientific
abstract and citation database
Leading web-based chemical reaction
workflow solution for industrial chemists
Integrated, online resources that complement
Elsevier’s nursing textbook content
SciVal provides research performance
tools for academic institutions and
funding intelligence
Premier life sciences journal with the
highest impact factor in biochemistry
and molecular biology
Clinical decision support tool to identify areas
for improvement in medical practice
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
11
single search interface for accessing ScienceDirect, Scopus and
scientific web content. In addition, SciVerse Application Marketplace
& Developer Network enables researchers and third party
developers to build customised applications on top of Elsevier’s
information and other data and analytics enhancing the utility of
the underlying content.
Following a successful collaboration since 2007, Elsevier acquired
QUOSA in January 2012. QUOSA’s technological capabilities will
raise the efficiency of the search and discovery process and will
also allow researchers to manage information more efficiently.
Elsevier is continuing to develop the SciVal suite of products
that help academic and government institutions evaluate their
research performance, determine research strategies and
increase institutional efficiencies. Leveraging bibliometric data,
such as citations from Scopus, SciVal Spotlight helps institutions
and governments to identify their distinctive research strengths,
evaluate performance and increase the focus of their R&D
investments. SciVal Funding assists researchers and institutions
in identifying grants that are most relevant in their research areas.
SciVal Experts enables researchers to establish a directory of
experts in their area of interest, while SciVal Strata facilitates
performance benchmarking by research teams.
health Sciences is a world leading medical information provider.
Through its medical journals, books, major reference works,
databases and online information tools, Elsevier provides critical
information and analysis on which its customers rely to base
their decisions, to improve medical outcomes and enhance the
efficiency of healthcare. Health Sciences serves medical
researchers, doctors, nurses, allied health professionals
and students, as well as hospitals, research institutions,
health insurers, managed healthcare organisations and
pharmaceutical companies.
Elsevier publishes over 700 health sciences journals, including
on behalf of learned societies, and, in 2011, 1,500 new health
sciences book titles and clinical reference works were published
both in print and through ScienceDirect and other electronic
platforms such as MD Consult. MD Consult is a leading online
clinical information service with more than 2,400 institutional
customers. Flagship titles include market leading medical
journals such as The Lancet, and major medical reference works
such as Gray’s Anatomy, Nelson’s Pediatrics and Netter’s Atlas of
Human Anatomy. In addition to its local language publishing in
many countries across the world, Health Sciences leverages its
content and solutions into new markets through local language
versioning. In November 2011, ClinicalKey was launched in beta
allowing physicians to access the leading reference and
evidence-based medicine in a single, fully-integrated site built
to accommodate their clinical information workflows.
Elsevier is a leader in medical education and training resources,
particularly to the nursing and allied health professions. From
print and electronic books to virtual clinical patient care, Health
Sciences supports students, teaching faculties and healthcare
organisations in education and practice. A strong focus is on the
further development of innovative electronic services: the Evolve
portal provides a rich resource to support faculty and students
and now has 3 million registered users; Evolve Reach (Health
Education Systems Inc.) provides online review and testing tools
for nursing and the allied health professions; Evolve Teach
provides online resources and solutions to support faculty.
A growing area of focus is clinical decision support, providing
online information and analytics to deliver patient-specific
solutions at the point of care to improve patient outcomes. Gold
Standard provides critical information on drug interactions to
assist effective treatment; CPM Resource Center provides a data
driven framework to support nurses in undertaking procedures;
Nursing Consult provides nursing care guidelines in trauma and
disease management; MEDai uses patient data and analytics to
help identify areas for improvement in clinical practice within
hospitals and lower costs for the payers of healthcare through
preventative interventions. In February 2011, Elsevier entered the
emerging clinical decision support market in China through the
acquisition of Datong, a leading online provider of drug information
that helps Chinese hospitals to improve quality of care through
better drug usage.
Elsevier also provides services to the pharmaceutical industry
through advertising and sponsored communications to the
specialist community it serves. In 2011, Elsevier continued the
restructuring of this business focusing more on the services
which leverage Health Sciences’ core information and
distribution platform.
REVENUE By foRmAt
£2,058m
Print/Other
37%
REVENUE By gEogRAPhIc mARkEt
£2,058m
Rest of World
Electronic
63%
North America
Europe
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
12
BUSINESS REVIEW
ELSEVIER
market opportunities
The science and medical information markets have good long
term demand growth characteristics. The importance of research
and development to economic performance and competitive
positioning is well understood by governments, academic
institutions and corporations. This is reflected in the long term
growth in R&D spend and in the number of researchers
worldwide, leading to greater research output and publishing.
Additionally, there is growing demand for tools that allow research
to better target and improve the spend and efficiency of the
research process.
In health, market growth is also supported by demographic
trends, with ageing populations that require more healthcare,
rising prosperity in developing economies with increasing
expectations of better healthcare provision, and the increasing
focus on improving medical outcomes and efficiency.
Given that a significant proportion of scientific research and
healthcare is funded directly or indirectly by governments, spending
is influenced by governmental budgetary considerations. The
commitment to research and health provision does, however,
remain high, even in more difficult budgetary environments.
Strategic priorities
Elsevier’s strategic goal is to make valued contributions to the
communities it serves in advancing science, improving medical
outcomes and enhancing productivity. To achieve this, Elsevier is
focused on: building world-class content; deepening its customer
engagement to identify how better to help them achieve their
desired outcomes more efficiently and effectively; delivering
tools which link, analyse and illuminate content and data to help
customers make critical decisions and improve their productivity;
increasing its investment in high-growth markets and disciplines;
and continuously improving organisational efficiency.
In Science & Technology, priorities are to continually enhance
the quality and relevance of research and reference content
and expand data sets, while adding greater functionality and
utility to SciVerse, ScienceDirect, Scopus and new tools to assist
researcher productivity. The SciVal suite of performance and
planning tools will continue to be expanded to help academic and
government institutions target their research spend and improve
research efficiency and economic outcomes.
In Health Sciences, priorities are to continue to enhance the
quality and relevance of its content and actively manage the
ongoing format shift from print to electronic information
consumption by developing improved electronic solutions that
add more value to its users and customers. Additionally, Health
Sciences continues to build out clinical decision support services
to meet customer demand for tools that deliver better medical
outcomes and lowers costs for payers, physicians and hospitals.
Elsevier is also focused on increasing growth in emerging
markets through expansion of local publishing and versioning
of content and electronic services.
Business model, distribution channels and competition
Science and medical research is principally disseminated on a
paid subscription basis to the research facilities of academic
institutions, government and corporations, and, in the case of
medical and healthcare journals, also to individual practitioners
and medical society members. Advertising and promotional
revenues are derived from pharmaceutical and other companies.
Electronic products, such as ScienceDirect, Scopus and MD Consult,
are generally sold direct to customers through a dedicated sales
force that has offices around the world. Subscription agents
facilitate the sales and administrative process for print journals.
Books are sold through traditional and online book stores,
wholesalers and, particularly in medical and healthcare markets,
directly to end users.
Competition within science and medical publishing is generally on
a title by title and product by product basis. Competing journals,
books and databases are typically published by learned societies
and other professional publishers. Workflow tools face similar
competition as well as from software companies and internal
solutions developed by customers.
RELAtIVE ImPAct fActoR
hEALth ScIENcES ELEctRoNIc REVENUE
0.96
0.96
1.00
1.02
1.06
24%
27%
32%
37%
40%
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Improvement in relative journal quality of Elsevier’s journal portfolio
through attracting the highest quality research.
Growing demand for online information and analytics driven by increasing
focus on improving medical outcomes and efficiency.
Relative impact factor is the average citation impact of Elsevier journal content
compared to other publishers (industry average = 1). Based on citation data from
Thomson Reuters.
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
13
Revenue
Science & Technology
Health Sciences
Adjusted operating profit
2011
£m
1,076
982
2,058
768
2010
£m
1,015
1,011
2,026
724
Change
Change at constant
currencies
Change
underlying
+6%
-3%
+2%
+6%
+4%
-2%
+1%
+3%
+4%
0%
+2%
+4%
2011 financial performance
Increasing global scientific and medical research activity
supported good growth in research information and online
tools. health Sciences saw continued pressure on print book
sales to individuals and European pharma promotion, but
achieved good growth in global medical research and clinical
decision support.
Underlying revenues and adjusted operating profits were up 2%
and 4% respectively.
Science & Technology generated underlying revenue growth
of 4%. Global research activity has continued to grow broadly
in line with long term historical trends, and Elsevier generated
good growth in the volume of articles submitted and published
in the year, and improved the quality of articles relative to other
publishers as measured by citation share. As academic research
becomes increasingly interdisciplinary and collaborative across
geographies, Elsevier is providing information and analytical tools
that help academic institutions to achieve better research outcomes.
Sales of databases and tools grew strongly.
Health Sciences underlying revenues were flat. Our global
medical research business benefited from similar drivers to those
in the Science & Technology research business, and online clinical
decision support achieved double digit growth as healthcare
customers look to achieve improved medical outcomes and
increased efficiency. Across Health Sciences, online solutions and
electronic products grew well and now account for nearly 40% of
revenues. European pharma promotion declines have continued,
and print book sales to individuals came under increasing
pressure, reflecting the format shift to online, and lower
enrolment in US nursing and health profession career schools.
Our business in emerging markets, most notably India, China and
in Latin America performed well.
Underlying cost growth was 1%, reflecting ongoing emphasis on
process efficiencies and procurement savings offsetting business
growth and spending on new product development and sales &
marketing initiatives.
outlook
The customer budgetary environment remains broadly similar
to that seen last year with variations by both geography and
customer. In research, we expect volume growth to continue,
and the subscription renewal process for 2012 is well progressed.
In health, we expect the transition from print to electronic to
continue, with strong demand for electronic solutions offset by
print declines. Overall, modest underlying revenue growth is
expected in 2012 for Elsevier.
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
REVENUE
£m
AdjUStEd oPERAtINg PRofIt
£m
1,507
1,700
1,985
2,026
2,058
693
724
768
568
477
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
14
BUSINESS REVIEW
LExISNExIS RISk SOLUTIONS
Risk Solutions
LexisNexis Risk Solutions
provides data and analytics that
enable its customers to evaluate
and manage risks associated
with transactions and improve
performance.
Risk Solutions is a leading provider of solutions that combine
proprietary, public and third-party information, analytics and
advanced technology. These solutions assist customers in
evaluating, predicting and managing risk and improving
operational effectiveness, predominantly in the US.
Total revenues for the year ended 31 December 2011 were £908m.
LexisNexis Risk Solutions is headquartered in Alpharetta, Georgia
and has principal operations in Georgia, Florida, and Ohio, and has
4,000 employees.
LexisNexis Risk Solutions is organised around market facing
industry/sector groups: insurance, government, screening, and
business services (including the receivables management,
financial services and corporate groups), of which insurance
is the most significant. These groups are supported by a
shared infrastructure providing technology operations, data
management, and other support functions including compliance
and marketing. A number of transactional support activities,
including some financial processes, are provided from a shared
services organisation managed by the LexisNexis Legal &
Professional business. The Legal & Professional business also
distributes Risk Solutions products into legal markets in the
US and internationally.
Insurance Solutions provides the most comprehensive
combination of data and analytics to property and casualty (P&C)
personal and commercial insurance carriers in the US to improve
critical aspects of their business, from customer acquisition and
underwriting to policy servicing and claims handling. Information
solutions, including the US’s most comprehensive personal loss
history database C.L.U.E., help insurers assess risks and provide
important inputs to underwriting policy. Recently introduced
products include Data Prefill, which provides accurate
information directly into the insurance workflow on customers,
potential customers and their auto ownership, and Current Carrier,
which identifies current or previous insurance as well as any
lapses in coverage.
Business Services provides financial institutions with risk
management, identity verification, fraud detection, credit risk
management, and compliance solutions. These include “know
your customer” and anti-money laundering products. The
business provides risk and identity management solutions for
corporate customers in retail, telecommunications and utilities
sectors. Receivables management solutions help debt recovery
professionals in the segmentation, management and collection of
consumer and business debt. The Risk Solutions business also
provides identity verification and risk related information to the
legal industry.
C.L.U.E.®
Most comprehensive US personal insurance
claims database
LexisNexis®
Data Prefill
Tool to automate insurance application
process providing critical information
insurers need to quote and underwrite
a policy
LexisNexis® Anti-Money
Laundering Solutions
Content and information for anti-money
laundering compliance, risk mitigation
and enhanced due diligence
Accurint® for Collections
The leading online US solution to help locate
debtors quickly and accurately
Accurint® LE Plus
Integrated suite of tools for US law
enforcement investigators
LexisNexis®
Identity Management
Range of solutions to help clients verify that
an identity exists and authenticate individuals
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
15
government Solutions provides investigative solutions to US
federal, state and local law enforcement and government
agencies to help solve criminal and intelligence cases and to
identify fraud, waste and abuse in government programmes.
Screening Solutions focuses on employment-related, resident
and volunteer screening, with the largest segment being
pre-employment screening services offered across a number
of industries including retail, recruitment, banking, and
professional services.
During 2011, Risk Solutions sharpened its focus on its data and
analytics activities with the sale of the insurance software
business, while Reed Elsevier’s acquisition of Accuity
complements and enhances Risk Solutions’ offerings in
anti-money laundering. There has also been a continued focus
on developing a pipeline of new solutions for selected adjacent
markets, sectors and geographies.
The identity verification and risk evaluation solutions provided by
Risk Solutions utilise a comprehensive database of public records
and proprietary information, which is the largest database of its
kind in the US market today. LexisNexis Accurint is the flagship risk
assessment product, powered by the High Performance Cluster
Computing (HPCC) technology. This technology enables Risk
Solutions to provide its customers with highly relevant search
results swiftly and to create new, low-cost solutions quickly and
efficiently. In 2011, Risk Solutions launched an open-source
initiative called HPCC Systems to broaden usage, tap the
innovation of the development community and to more fully
compete in the “big data” market. Response to date has been very
positive, with press articles, website traffic, speaking invitations,
and source code downloads all significantly ahead of expectations.
market opportunities
Risk Solutions operates in markets with strong long term
underlying growth drivers: insurance underwriting transactions;
insurance, healthcare and entitlement fraud; credit defaults
and financial fraud; regulatory compliance and due diligence
requirements surrounding customer enrolment and employment;
and security considerations.
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
REVENUE By foRmAt
£908m
Print/Other 4%
REVENUE By SEgmENt*
£908m
Government
Screening
Electronic
96%
Insurance
Solutions
Business
Services
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
*100% revenue in North America.
m
a
t
i
o
n
16
BUSINESS REVIEW
LExISNExIS RISk SOLUTIONS
In the insurance segment, growth is supported by increasing
transactional activity in the auto and property insurance markets
and the increasing adoption by insurance carriers of more
sophisticated data and analytics in the prospecting, underwriting
and claims evaluation processes, to determine appropriate risk
pricing, increase competitiveness and improve operating cost
efficiency. Transactional activity is driven by insurance quoting
and switching as consumers seek better policy terms, stimulated
by increasing competition between insurance companies, high
levels of carrier advertising, and rising levels of internet quoting
and policy binding.
In screening, demand is driven mainly by employer hiring activity
and, in receivables management, by levels of consumer debt and
the prospects of recovering those debts. Both of these markets
are linked to employment conditions in the US. A number of factors
support growth for risk solutions in the financial services market,
including new credit originations, continued high fraud losses,
stringent regulatory compliance requirements, and increasing
anti-money laundering fines. In corporate markets, demand is
supported by growth in online retail sales and continued high
levels of credit card fraud. Growth in government markets is
driven by the increasing use of data and analytics to combat
criminal activity and fraud, and to address security issues.
The level and timing of demand in this market is influenced by
government funding considerations.
Strategic priorities
Risk Solutions’ strategic goal is to make businesses and
government more effective, through a better understanding
of the risks associated with individuals, other businesses and
transactions and by providing the tools to help manage those
risks. To achieve this, Risk Solutions is focused on: expanding
the range of products across customer workflows; leveraging
our advanced technology capabilities; delivering innovative
new products and expanding the range of risk management
solutions across adjacent markets; and addressing international
opportunities in selected markets to meet local risk
management needs.
Business model, distribution channels and competition
Risk Solutions’ products are predominantly sold on a
transactional basis directly to insurance carriers and
corporations, and primarily on a subscription basis to
government entities.
Risk Solutions and Verisk sell data and analytics solutions to
insurance carriers but largely address different activities. Risk
Solutions’ principal competitors in commercial and government
sectors include Thomson Reuters and major credit bureaus.
Major competitors in pre-employment screening are Altegrity
and First Advantage.
gRoWth IN IdENtIty VERIfIcAtIoN tRANSActIoNS
gRoWth IN INSURANcE cLAImS tRANSActIoNS
+30%
+17%
2010
2011
2010
2011
Growth in identity verification transactions driven by customers across
our markets looking to verify individuals and businesses to comply with
regulations and prevent identity theft and fraud.
Increasing penetration of the insurance carrier workflow with uptake of
products to investigate claims, adjudicate them quickly and identify fraud
and subrogation opportunities.
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
17
Revenue
Adjusted operating profit
2011
£m
908
362
2010
£m
927
354
Change
-2%
+2%
Change at constant
currencies
+1%
+6%
Change
underlying
+4%
+12%
LexisNexis Risk Solutions and LexisNexis Legal & Professional, previously combined as one LexisNexis business, have operated as two distinct businesses from 1 January
2011. Comparative profit figures and growth rates are presented on a pro forma basis.
2011 financial performance
continued good growth in insurance data & analytics and
business services reflects solid demand for our core products
and the successful extension of the range of services that we
provide. Screening revenues slowed in the second half reflecting
hiring trends, and US federal government markets remained
under pressure.
Underlying revenues and adjusted operating profits were up 4%
and 12% respectively.
The insurance data & analytics business generated revenue
growth of 7%, driven by the increasing adoption of solutions across
the insurance workflow from marketing through to claims handling
that improve underwriting economics and operational efficiency.
In November, LexisNexis Risk Solutions completed the sale of its
infrastructure software business, focusing the insurance
business on high value data and analytics.
Business services achieved growth of 4%, reflecting good growth
in credit scoring and anti-money laundering for the financial
services industry and e-commerce for corporate markets,
moderated by the effect of a softening in the US real estate market
on the mortgage-related business.
Screening solutions grew 3%, with growth slowing over the
course of the year as operational improvements in sales force
effectiveness and increased penetration of the mid-size corporate
market were offset by a US hiring environment that weakened as
the year progressed. Government solutions revenues declined as
the wind down of some lower margin one-off federal sales were
only partly offset by growth in state and local revenues, driven by
increased focus on fraud, waste and abuse.
Underlying costs declined 1% despite the business growth
and new product investment, reflecting cost savings, notably
in technology, and from the successful ChoicePoint integration.
The adjusted operating margin increased by 1.7 percentage
points to 39.9%.
outlook
In 2012, we expect good growth in insurance data and analytics
to continue, driven by sustained demand for core underwriting
products and growth from new products. We expect business
services to continue to perform well, supported by new product
growth in financial services and corporate markets. The screening
solutions outlook is more uncertain given the US employment
environment, and in government solutions, while federal budgets
remain under pressure, growth is expected from state and
local government.
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
REVENUE
£m
378
AdjUStEd oPERAtINg PRofIt
£m
865
927
908
354
362
2008
2009
2010
2011
2010*
2011
*On a pro forma basis
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
18
BUSINESS REVIEW
LExISNExIS LEGAL & PROFESSIONAL
Legal & Professional
LexisNexis Legal & Professional
provides legal, tax, regulatory and
news & business information and
analysis to legal, corporate,
government, accounting and
academic markets.
LexisNexis Legal & Professional is a world leading provider of
content and information solutions for legal and other corporate
markets. Serving customers in more than 100 countries,
LexisNexis Legal & Professional provides resources and
services that inform decisions, increase productivity and drive
new business.
Total revenues for the year ended 31 December 2011 were
£1,634m. LexisNexis Legal & Professional is headquartered
in New York and has principal operations in Ohio and New Jersey
in the United States, in London and Paris in Europe, Canada, and
in several other countries in Africa and Asia Pacific. It has 10,300
employees worldwide.
LexisNexis Legal & Professional is organised through market
facing businesses, the most significant of which are Research
& Litigation Solutions and Business Solutions in the US and
LexisNexis Europe, Africa & Australasia and LexisNexis Asia
outside the US. These are supported by global shared services
organisations providing platform and product development,
operational and distribution services, and other support
functions.
LexisNexis is a leading provider of legal and business information
and analysis to law firms, corporations and government
throughout the US. Electronic information solutions and
innovative workflow tools, developed through close collaboration
with customers, help law firms and other legal and business
professionals make better informed decisions in the practice of
law and in managing their businesses.
In Research & Litigation Solutions, the flagship products for legal
research are Lexis.com and Lexis Advance, which provide federal
and state statutes and case law, together with analysis and expert
commentaries from sources such as Matthew Bender and Michie
and the leading citation service Shepard’s, which advises on the
continuing relevance of case law precedents. Through its suite
of litigation services, LexisNexis additionally provides lawyers
with tools for electronic discovery, evidence management,
case analysis, court docket tracking, e-filing, expert witness
identification and legal document preparation. LexisNexis also
partners with law schools to provide services to students as
part of their training.
In December 2011, LexisNexis released in the US the next iteration
of Lexis Advance, an innovative web application designed to
transform how legal professionals conduct research. Built on
an advanced technology platform, Lexis Advance allows primary
researchers within legal and professional organisations to find
highly relevant information more easily and efficiently, helping
them to drive better outcomes. The release is the next step in a
series of Lexis Advance launches with future releases continuing to
expand available content and add new innovative tools. LexisNexis
employs lawyers and trained editors with professional legal
backgrounds who review, annotate and update the legal content to
help ensure each document in its collection is current and linked
to other related documents. This domain expertise combined with
Lexis®
Unparalleled legal, news and public records
content for legal professionals
Lexis® for Microsoft® Office
Integration of LexisNexis content, open web
search and Microsoft Office
Lexis® Library
LexisNexis® Uk flagship legal online product
Matthew Bender®
Critical analysis, checklists, forms, and
practice guides authored by industry experts
covering over 50 major practice areas
Premier citation service
Lexis® PSL
LexisNexis® Uk legal practical
guidance service
New online legal research tool that
transforms the way legal professionals
conduct research
Lawyers.comSM
Leading website for consumers seeking legal
information and counsel
JurisClasseur
Largest, most authoritative online legal
resource in France
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
19
the application of Reed Elsevier’s “big data” HPCC technology
means LexisNexis is able to update its entire legal collection
faster and more efficiently, while also identifying and linking
content, thereby uncovering previously undiscovered
relationships between documents.
In the US in 2011, LexisNexis launched LexisNexis Firm Manager,
an online legal practice management application for solo
practitioners and small law practices. Among other product
releases, LexisNexis also released Early Data Analyzer which
provides lawyers with early insight into the size and scope of
discovery and an updated version of Lexis for Microsoft Office
which enables lawyers to conduct their Lexis searches within
Microsoft applications such as Word and Outlook.
In 2011, LexisNexis rationalised its electronic discovery offerings
and divested the Applied Discovery business.
LexisNexis Business Solutions provides law firms with practice
management solutions, including time and billing systems, case
management, cost recovery and document management
services. LexisNexis assists law firms in their client development
through Lawyers.com, showcasing the qualifications and
credentials of more than one million lawyers and law firms
in the US and internationally, and providing law firms with
website development, search engine optimisation and other
web marketing services.
LexisNexis also provides its legal and information services to US
government, corporate and academic customers, including news
and business information and public records. In addition to
research and litigation services, capabilities for these customers
include specialist products for corporate counsel focused on
regulatory compliance, intellectual property management, and
management of external counsel.
In International markets outside the United States, LexisNexis
serves legal, corporate, government and academic markets
in Europe, Canada, Africa and Asia Pacific with local and
international legal, tax, regulatory and business information.
The most significant businesses are in the Uk, France, Australia
and Canada.
LexisNexis is focused across all its geographies on leveraging
best in class content and its market leading international online
product platform to deliver innovative electronic information
services and workflow tools to help legal and business
professionals make better informed decisions more efficiently.
Penetration of online information services is growing and print
based products now account for less than 40% of LexisNexis total
revenues outside the US.
In the Uk, LexisNexis is a leading legal information provider
in its market. It delivers a wide array of content and services,
comprising an unrivalled collection of primary and secondary
legislation, case law, expert commentary, and forms and
precedents. Its extensive portfolio includes Halsbury’s Laws
of England, Simon’s Taxes and Butterworths Company Law
Service delivered through the Uk’s flagship online product
LexisLibrary and in print. Other electronic products include
Lexis Legal Intelligence, a resource on legal practice for lawyers,
and media monitoring and reputation management tools for
the corporate market such as the NexisDirect research tool.
Additionally, LexisNexis provides law firms with practice
management solutions.
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
REVENUE By foRmAt
£1,634m
Print/Other
25%
REVENUE By gEogRAPhIc mARkEt
£1,634m
Rest of World
Electronic
75%
Europe
North America
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
20
BUSINESS REVIEW
LExISNExIS LEGAL & PROFESSIONAL
In France, LexisNexis is a provider of information to lawyers,
notaries and courts with JurisClasseur and La Semaine Juridique
being the principal publications, delivered through lexisnexis.fr
and in print. These content sources are, as in the Uk, being
combined with new content and innovative workflow tools to
develop practical guidance and practice management solutions.
In international markets in 2011, LexisNexis continued to roll out
Legal Intelligence. Designed to match the way lawyers work,
Lexis Legal Intelligence provides primary law, practical guidance,
learning and productivity tools in one place. It reduces the time
it takes to get the answers and documents lawyers need, helping
to make practice more effective. In the Uk, the practical guidance
service LexisPSL now has 13 practice areas including company,
commercial, corporate, banking and finance, and will expand
again in 2012. A similar service has been launched in Australia,
with five practice areas in 2011. In France, LexisNexis is
completing the development of Lexis360, an innovative solution
for legal professionals that combines semantic and federated
search capabilities with practical guidance, legal concept
navigation and brand-leading JurisClasseur content.
In 2011, LexisNexis Legal & Professional strengthened its position
in key emerging markets including India. LexisNexis released an
initial version of Lexis India, an online legal research platform
created specifically for the legal professionals and practitioners,
corporate counsels, legal researchers, academics and
government institutions in India.
market opportunities
Longer term growth in legal and regulatory markets worldwide is
driven by increasing levels of legislation, regulation, regulatory
complexity and litigation, and an increasing number of lawyers.
Additional market opportunities are presented by the increasing
demand for online information solutions and practice management
tools that improve the quality and productivity of research, deliver
better legal outcomes, and improve business performance.
Notwithstanding this, legal activity and legal information markets
are also influenced by economic conditions and corporate activity,
as has been seen with the dampening impact on demand of the
recent global recession and the somewhat subdued environment
that followed in North America and in Europe.
Strategic priorities
LexisNexis Legal & Professional’s strategic goal is to enable
better legal outcomes and be the leading provider of productivity
enhancing information and information-based workflow solutions
in its markets. To achieve this LexisNexis is focused on: building
world class content; developing next generation product
platforms, tools and infrastructure to deliver best-in-class
outcomes for legal and business professionals with greater
speed and efficiency; building client development and practice
management tools enabling customers to be more successful
in their markets; international expansion and growth of online
products and solutions; increasing LexisNexis’ presence in
emerging markets; and improving operational efficiency.
In the US, the focus is on the continuing development of the
next generation of legal research and practice solutions as well
as a major upgrade in operations infrastructure and customer
service and support platforms to provide an integrated and
superior customer experience across US legal research,
litigation services, practice management and client development.
Progressive product introductions, often based on the Lexis
Advance platform, over the next few years will combine advanced
technology with enriched content, sophisticated analytics and
applications to enable LexisNexis’ customers to make better
legal decisions and drive better outcomes for their organisations
and clients.
Outside the US, LexisNexis is focused on growing online services
and developing further high quality actionable content and
workflow tools, including the development of practical guidance
and practice management applications. Additionally, LexisNexis
is focusing on the expansion of its activities in emerging markets.
Business model, distribution channels and competition
LexisNexis Legal & Professional products and services are
generally sold directly to law firms and to corporate, government
and academic customers on a paid subscription basis, with
subscriptions with law firms often under multi-year contracts.
Principal competitors for LexisNexis in US legal markets are
West (Thomson Reuters), CCH (Wolters kluwer) and Bloomberg,
and Bloomberg and Factiva (News Corporation) in news and
business information. Competitors in litigation solutions also
include software companies. Major international competitors
include Thomson Reuters, Wolters kluwer and Factiva.
INtERNAtIoNAL LEgAL ELEctRoNIc REVENUE
moBILE APP doWNLoAdS
43%
46%
51%
53%
55%
+332%
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2010
2011
Growth in international (outside US) online solutions and workflow tools to
help lawyers make better informed decisions more efficiently.
Strong growth in the adoption and number of mobile apps.
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
21
Revenue
Adjusted operating profit
2011
£m
1,634
229
2010
£m
1,691
238
Change
-3%
-4%
Change at constant
currencies
-2%
-4%
Change
underlying
+1%
-2%
LexisNexis Risk Solutions and LexisNexis Legal & Professional, previously combined as one LexisNexis business, have operated as two distinct businesses from 1 January
2011. Comparative profit figures and growth rates are presented on a pro forma basis.
2011 financial performance
LexisNexis Legal & Professional revenues returned to
underlying revenue growth in 2011, and margins were broadly
flat as expected. most of our legal markets have stabilised,
and we stepped up new product launch activity.
Underlying revenues and adjusted operating profits were up 1%
and down 2% respectively.
Our US research & litigation revenues returned to slight growth,
benefiting from a stabilisation in legal industry activity. We
achieved good growth in lexis.com searches and in new sales
of research and litigation tools and services to law firms,
government and corporate legal customers. Growth in practice
management tools was offset by continued but moderating
declines in news & business information to corporate customers,
and in web based listings.
International markets outside the US also returned to growth.
Electronic revenues grew 7% reflecting strong demand for legal
tools and solutions, although this was largely offset by further
print declines as format transition continued. Print based
products now account for less than 40% of revenue.
Significant progress has been made in the development of next
generation legal offerings with a number of new product releases
during the course of the year including the latest release of
Lexis Advance in December, targeting research intensive lawyers.
Initial feedback from the legal community has been very positive,
positioning us well for future product releases.
Underlying cost growth was 1% reflecting continued investment
in next generation legal offerings and sales & marketing, offset
by continued cost initiatives. The adjusted operating margin was
broadly flat at 14.0%.
outlook
In 2012 we intend to continue to introduce new products that will
better serve our legal and corporate customer base. However,
legal markets remain stable but subdued, limiting revenue and
margin growth potential in the short term.
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
REVENUE
£m
AdjUStEd oPERAtINg PRofIt
£m
1,562
1,692
1,691
1,634
238
229
2008
2009
2010
2011
2010*
2011
*On a pro forma basis
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
22
BUSINESS REVIEW
REED ExHIBITIONS
Reed Exhibitions is the world’s
leading events business, with over
475 events in 34 countries.
Reed Exhibitions’ portfolio of exhibitions and conferences serves
44 industry sectors across the Americas, Europe, the Middle East
and Asia Pacific. In 2011 Reed Exhibitions brought together over
six million event participants from around the world, generating
billions of dollars in business for its customers.
Total revenues for the year ended 31 December 2011 were £707m.
Reed Exhibitions is a global business headquartered in London
and has principal offices in Paris, Vienna, Norwalk (Connecticut),
Abu Dhabi, Beijing, Tokyo, Sydney and São Paulo. Reed Exhibitions
has 2,800 employees worldwide.
Reed Exhibitions organises market leading events that are
relevant to industry needs, where participants from around the
world come together to do business, network and learn. Its
exhibitions and conferences encompass a wide range of sectors,
including: broadcasting, TV, music & entertainment; building &
construction; electronics & electrical engineering; alternative
energy, oil & gas; engineering, manufacturing & processing;
gifts; interior design; IT & telecoms; jewellery; life sciences &
pharmaceuticals; marketing; property & real estate; sports
& recreation; and travel.
In January 2012 Reed Exhibitions took full ownership of our joint
venture, Alcantara Machado, Brazil’s leading exhibition organiser.
market opportunities
Growth in the exhibitions market is correlated to business to
business marketing spend, historically driven by levels of
corporate profitability, which itself has followed overall growth
in GDP, and business investment. Emerging markets and growth
industries provide additional opportunities. As some events are
held other than annually, growth in any one year is affected by the
cycle of non-annual exhibitions.
The world’s entertainment content market
International machinery trade fair
Event for the restaurant, hotel, café and
catering industries
Premier global event for the travel industry
The North American jewellery industry’s
premier trade event
Leading international exhibition for personal
care ingredients
The world’s property market
World platform for sustainable future
energy solutions
One of the largest business gifts & home
fairs in China
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
23
Strategic priorities
Reed Exhibitions’ strategic goal is to provide market leading
events in growth sectors, especially in higher growth geographies,
that enable businesses to target and reach new customers
quickly and cost effectively and to provide a platform for industry
participants to do business, network and learn. To achieve
this, Reed Exhibitions is focused on: driving organic growth by
leveraging global sector groups and technology platforms,
developing the portfolio through a combination of new launches,
strategic partnerships and selective acquisitions in high growth
sectors and geographies; and further developing websites,
analytics and other online tools to enhance the exhibition
experience and add to customer return on investment in
event participation.
In 2011, at a portfolio level, this strategy delivered 43 new events in
high growth sectors such as the Gift and Home industry in China,
Incentive Travel in the USA, and Smart Grids in Japan and
Singapore, as well as further acquisitions to build out our leading
position in Brazil, enter Mexico and Morocco, and increase our
exposure to the Renewable Energy industry in the Uk. In terms
of systems and customer experience, Reed Exhibitions has
continued to invest in developing its event web platform which
is now used by more than 70% of events.
Business model, distribution channels and competition
The substantial majority of Reed Exhibitions’ revenues are from
sales of exhibition space. The balance includes conference fees,
advertising in exhibition guides, sponsorship fees and, for some
shows, admission charges. Exhibition space is sold directly or
through local agents where applicable. Reed Exhibitions often
works in collaboration with trade associations, which use the
events to promote access for members to domestic and export
markets, and with governments, for whom events can provide
important support to stimulate foreign investment and promote
regional and national enterprise.
Reed Exhibitions is the market leader in a fragmented industry,
holding less than a 10% global market share. Other international
exhibition organisers include UBM, Informa IIR and some of the
larger German Messe, including Messe Frankfurt, Messe
Düsseldorf and Messe Munich. Competition also comes from
industry trade associations and convention centre and exhibition
hall owners.
NUmBER of EVENt LAUNchES
EVENtS IN EmERgINg mARkEtS
43
35
139
99
2010
2011
2010
2011
New event launches focusing on high growth sectors and geographies.
Significant increase in events taking place in high growth geographies
through new launches and acquisitions.
REVENUE By foRmAt
£707m
Other 2%
REVENUE By gEogRAPhIc mARkEt*
£707m
Rest of World
North America
Face to face
98%
Europe
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
*On an event location basis.
m
a
t
i
o
n
24
BUSINESS REVIEW
REED ExHIBITIONS
Revenue
Adjusted operating profit
2011
£m
707
167
2010
£m
693
158
Change
+2%
+6%
Change at constant
currencies
+1%
+4%
Change
underlying
0%
+2%
2011 financial performance
the net cycling out of biennial shows held back growth in 2011.
Excluding biennial cycling, underlying revenue growth was 10%,
with good growth across all geographies. New launch activity
was accelerated, and we have made a number of selective
acquisitions which have increased our presence in high
growth markets.
Underlying revenues and adjusted operating profits were flat
and up 2% respectively.
In Europe, underlying revenue grew 6% excluding biennial cycling,
with Mipcom and Mapic performing particularly well. Mipim,
Reed Exhibitions’ largest individual show, returned to good growth
after experiencing a decline in 2010. In North America underlying
revenues grew 16% excluding cycling, with strong performances
across a wide range of events. Outside Europe and North America
underlying revenue growth was 13% excluding biennial events,
including particularly strong growth in China, Brazil, Russia and
the Middle East.
New launch activity was accelerated in 2011, leveraging our
global sector groups and technology platform, with 43 new events,
the vast majority of which were in faster growing markets and
sectors. In addition to new launches, Reed Exhibitions made a
number of small complementary acquisitions during the year
including Multiplus, serving the biofuels industry, and Expo
Seguridad, extending our security sector portfolio into Latin
America. In January 2012 Reed Exhibitions took full ownership of
our joint venture, Alcantara Machado, Brazil’s leading exhibition
organiser. In addition to expanding our presence in this high
growth market, this will help to reduce the revenue impact of
biennial cycling in future years.
Underlying costs were down 1%, reflecting tight cost control,
while funding the significantly increased launch programme and
build out of global industry groups and information technology
capabilities. The adjusted operating margin was 0.8 percentage
points higher than in 2010 at 23.6%.
outlook
2012 revenues will benefit from the net cycling in of biennial
events. 2012 has started well, with good performances from
annual shows, albeit with some signs of softness in European
markets. We remain alert to how changes in the macro economic
environment may impact customer sentiment as the year
progresses, particularly in Europe.
REVENUE
£m
AdjUStEd oPERAtINg PRofIt
£m
707
638
693
707
577
183
139
152
158
167
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
25
IMAGE OF TOKYO SHOW
Finetech Japan
Reed Exhibitions Japan hosted a packed Finetech just one month after the devastating earthquake that hit the country
in March 2011. Finetech Japan is the world’s largest tradeshow in the field of liquid crystal and plasma display
manufacturing, and is held in Tokyo each April.
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
26
BUSINESS REVIEW
REED BUSINESS INFORMATION
Reed Business Information
is a provider of data services,
business information and
marketing solutions to business
professionals.
Reed Business Information (RBI) provides data services,
information and marketing solutions to business professionals
in the Uk, the US, Continental Europe, Asia and Australia.
It produces industry critical data services and lead generation
tools, online community and job sites as well as business
magazines with market leading positions in many sectors.
Total revenues for the year ended 31 December 2011 were £695m.
RBI is a global business headquartered in Sutton in the Uk and has
principal operations in Amsterdam in the Netherlands, Boston,
Los Angeles, Skokie (Illinois) and Norcross (Georgia) in the US as
well as Paris, Milan, Madrid, Bilbao, Sydney and Shanghai. RBI has
5,600 employees worldwide.
RBI’s data services enable businesses and professionals to
enhance productivity through quicker and easier access to
insightful and comprehensive industry information. Online
marketing solutions, business to business magazines, online lead
generation services and community websites provide effective
marketing channels for advertisers to reach target audiences
and for industry professionals to access valued information.
RBI’s market leading data services include: ICIS, a global
information and pricing service for the petrochemicals and energy
sector; BankersAccuity (previously Bankers’ Almanac and Accuity),
a leading provider of reference data on the banking industry;
XpertHR, an online service providing human resources data,
regulatory guidance, best practices and tools for HR professionals;
and Reed Construction Data, a provider of online construction data
to the North American construction industry.
The major online marketing solutions include: totaljobs.com,
a major Uk online recruitment site; and Hotfrog, a global online
business directory. Premier publishing brands include Variety
in the US, New Scientist in the Uk and the Elsevier magazine in
the Netherlands.
In 2011, RBI continued to significantly reshape its portfolio,
addressing continued growth opportunities in data services and
the accelerated migration of customer marketing spend to web
media while managing value from the remaining print businesses.
During the year RBI expanded the data services businesses with
three significant acquisitions. In January 2011, RBI completed the
transaction to take majority ownership of CBI China, the market
leading petrochemical and energy information service in China,
Global provider of news and pricing data to the
chemical and energy industries
Online aircraft and engine data used by
airline industry to inform decisions and
identify opportunities
A leading supplier of banking intelligence
to the global financial industry
Construction data, building product
information, cost data, market analysis
and advertising channels to construction
industry professionals
Leading HR legal compliance and good
practice toolkit
Premier source of entertainment business
news and analysis since 1905
World’s leading science and technology
media brand
Leading news and opinion magazine in the
Netherlands
Uk generalist job website attracting over
3.7 million jobseekers and carrying over
125,000 jobs every month
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
27
bringing unrivalled coverage of the important and growing
Chinese and Asian chemicals and energy markets, strengthening
ICIS’s global position. In June 2011, RBI acquired Ascend, a leading
provider of online fleet data and valuations to the aviation industry,
complementing RBI’s existing data and content services and the
aerospace platform, Flightglobal. In November 2011, RBI completed
the acquisition of Accuity Inc. for a total cost of £343m. Accuity is a
leading US provider of online subscription-based data solutions
for the financial services industry which enable customers to
maximise the accuracy of their banking and payment transactions,
and to minimise the risk of non-compliance with government
regulations in these transactions. Accuity is being integrated with
RBI’s Bankers’ Almanac, to form BankersAccuity, establishing a
global standard for payment efficiency and compliance solutions.
RBI continued to create value from its existing magazine brands,
whilst exiting a number of titles including those in the computing,
social care and road transport markets in the Uk and the
construction market in the Netherlands. RBI also sold the Uk
QSS magazine subscription fulfilment business during the course
of the year.
market opportunities
The growing need for authoritative industry data and information is
driving demand for online subscription data services and providing
new opportunities. Business to business marketing spend has
historically been driven by levels of corporate profitability, which
itself has followed GDP growth, and business investment.
Strategic priorities
RBI’s strategic goal is to help business professionals achieve
better outcomes with information and decision support in its
individual markets. Its areas of strategic focus are: further
growing the data services businesses; restructuring the business
magazines and advertising driven portfolio, to develop online
services in key markets and support print franchises through
brand extensions and redesign; and to realign the cost base with
revenue expectations and drive further organisational
effectiveness.
Business model, distribution channels and competition
Across the RBI portfolio, user and subscription revenues now
account for 62% of the total business with the remaining 38% derived
from print and online advertising and lead generation. RBI electronic
revenue streams now account for 51% of total revenue.
Data services are typically sold directly on a subscription or
transactional basis. Business magazines are distributed on a paid
or controlled circulation basis. Advertising and lead generation
revenues are sold directly or through agents.
RBI’s data services and titles compete with a number of publishers
on a service and title by title basis including: UBM, McGraw Hill
and Wolters kluwer as well as many niche and privately-owned
competitors. RBI competes for online advertising with other
business to business websites as well as Monster, Google and
other search engines.
ELEctRoNIc REVENUE
USER ANd SUBScRIPtIoN REVENUE
34%
38%
30%
46%
51%
44%
46%
54%
59%
62%
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Demand for online data services and marketing solutions drives increasing
proportion of online revenue.
Increasing proportion of user and subscription revenues driven by organic
growth in subscription businesses and portfolio change.
REVENUE By SEgmENt
£695m
REVENUE By gEogRAPhIc mARkEt
£695m
Other business
magazines/services
Data services
Rest of World
North America
Major marketing
solutions
Leading brands
Rest of
Europe
Netherlands
UK
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
28
BUSINESS REVIEW
REED BUSINESS INFORMATION
Revenue
Adjusted operating profit
2011
£m
695
110
2010
£m
718
89
Change
-3%
+23%
Change at constant
currencies
-4%
+22%
Change
underlying
+1%
+15%
2011 financial performance
RBI returned to underlying revenue growth, with strong growth
in data services mostly offset by continued weakness in print
advertising. We made significant further progress on portfolio
realignment with acquisitions in data services and disposals
of print magazine titles. the majority of the margin increase
reflects organic development, supported by our exits from
low margin businesses.
Underlying revenues and adjusted operating profits were up
1% and 15% respectively.
The major data services businesses, which accounted for 25%
of RBI revenues in 2011, delivered underlying revenue growth
of 9%, with strong growth in ICIS, Bankers’ Almanac and XpertHR,
partially offset by Reed Construction Data serving the challenged
US construction industry. Online marketing solutions grew 2%,
driven largely by Totaljobs in the Uk online recruitment market,
offset by weakness in lead generation businesses, BuyerZone and
Hotfrog. Leading brands saw stable revenues, with online growth
compensating for print advertising declines. Other business
magazines and communities saw an underlying revenue decline
of 5% reflecting continued print advertising market weakness.
Underlying costs were down 2%, reflecting continuing measures
taken to realign the cost base. Adjusted operating margins
increased 3.4 percentage points to 15.8%.
RBI built on its existing data services offerings with three
acquisitions made in the year. The acquisition of a majority stake
in CBI China brings a market leading petrochemical and energy
information business to complement ICIS. The combination of
Accuity, acquired in November, with Bankers’ Almanac creates
leading positions in payment efficiency, transaction compliance and
bank counterparty assessment for the financial services industry.
Ascend, a leading provider of online aircraft and valuation data to
the aviation industry, complements the Flightglobal aerospace
business. A number of disposals were also made during the
course of the year, including Uk road transport and computing
titles and the QSS magazine subscription fulfilment business.
outlook
Good growth in data services is expected to continue in 2012
offset by softness in print advertising. RBI will have a full year
contribution from the recent acquisitions of CBI China, Ascend and
Accuity, partially offset by the effects of small disposals. In the
current economic environment, we remain cautious on the near
term outlook for advertising and marketing based revenues.
REVENUE
£m
AdjUStEd oPERAtINg PRofIt
£m
906
987
891
718
695
121
126
89
89
110
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
29
Corporate
responsibility
The Corporate Responsibility Report is an
integral part of our Annual Reports and
Financial Statements. This section highlights
key achievements relative to our 2011 corporate
responsibility objectives. You can read the
full 2011 Corporate Responsibility Report at
reporting.reedelsevier.com/cr11
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
30
BUSINESS REVIEW
CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY
Corporate responsibility
Corporate responsibility ensures
good management of risks and
opportunities, helps us attract
and retain the best people, and
strengthens our corporate
reputation. It means performing
to the highest commercial and
ethical standards and channelling
our knowledge and strengths,
as global leaders in our industries,
to make a difference to society.
Constant engagement with stakeholders, including shareholders,
employees, communities, governments, and members of civil
society, helps us determine material corporate responsibility
issues. The Reed Elsevier Boards, senior management,
and the Corporate Responsibility Forum oversee corresponding
objectives and monitor performance against them.
We concentrate on the unique contributions we make as a
business and on good management of the material areas that
affect all companies encompassing:
1. Our unique contributions
2. Governance
3. People
4. Customers
5. Community
6. Supply chain
7. Environment
1. Our unique contributions
We focus on areas where we can make a positive impact on society
through our knowledge, resources and skills. This includes
universal sustainable access to information, advance of science
and health, promotion of the rule of law and justice, and protection
of society.
Elsevier, the world’s largest scientific publisher, plays an
important role in advancing human welfare and economic
progress through its science and health information which spurs
knowledge and enables critical decision making. To ensure access
to this information, Elsevier supports key programmes in places
where resources are often scarce. Among them is Research4Life,
in partnership with United Nations agencies and other publishers,
which provides core and cutting-edge scientific information to
researchers in more than 100 developing countries. In 2011, we
made available all content on ScienceDirect encompassing around
2,000 peer-reviewed journals and 15,000 books and made another
950 health science books available. In the year, there were over
three million Research4Life article downloads from ScienceDirect.
In addition to support for ongoing projects, the Elsevier
Foundation committed $650,000 through its Innovative Libraries
in Developing Countries programme to support infrastructure-
building and access to primary source material through grants to
libraries like Tanzania’s Sokoine National Agricultural Library and
the National University of Laos. Other Foundation grants focused
on supporting nurse faculties and helping early- to mid-career
women scientists balance family responsibilities with their
academic careers. During the year, at the request of the US
Secretary of State, Elsevier chaired a State Department session
on promoting women in science in the developing world and
participated in meetings of the UN Commission on the Status
of Women.
LexisNexis Risk Solutions tools and resources help protect society.
It supports non-profit organisations such as the National Center
for Missing & Exploited Children (NCMEC) and the Cal Ripken Sr.
Foundation, in addition to a number of large youth development
organisations. Since 2007, LexisNexis has completed more than
5.4 million volunteer background checks for such organisations,
identifying over 475,000 individuals with at least one criminal
conviction attempting to gain employment or to volunteer with a
non-profit organisation, including over 1,021 registered sex
offenders. Employees helped create the ADAM programme which
assists in the safe recovery of missing children. In partnership with
NCMEC, ADAM distributes missing child posters to police, news
media, schools, businesses, medical centres, and other recipients
within a specific geographic search area. Since launching in 2000,
126 children have been located. Through the year, LexisNexis Risk
Solutions helped spread information on the importance of
volunteer background screening.
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
31
Case study
Reed Elsevier supported the 2011 UNICEF report, Children’s
Vulnerability to Climate Change and Disaster Impacts in
East Asia and the Pacific, with access to product, experts,
editorial assistance, and funding.
Millions of children across East Asia and the Pacific already
suffer from a lack of access to clean water and proper
sanitation, and are vulnerable to food shocks and risks of
disease. The report showed that climate change will likely
worsen this situation.
The UNICEF report presents an analysis of the climate
change trends and potential impacts on children in East
Asia and the Pacific, based on findings from country studies
in Indonesia, Mongolia, the Philippines and Kiribati and
Vanuatu in the Pacific, as well as children’s perspectives
on climate change and other research.
While the report suggests that the impacts of climate
change vary from country to country, children in all
Image UNI82296: © UNICEF/NYHQ2010-0452/Cullen
countries were aware that changes in their environment
were already present. Many stated that climate change
has affected their families’ livelihoods and, in some cases,
caused parents to take them out of school to help collect
water and fuel and supplement household income. In
Mongolia, children noted harsher winters and declining
water resources and in the Philippines children spoke of
heavier rainy periods.
The report cites evidence showing that when children are
educated, informed and involved, they share information
with others in their communities and are better able to
prepare and protect themselves. According to Anupama
Rao Singh, UNICEF Regional Director for East Asia and the
Pacific, “Now is the time to put in place adaptation strategies
that ensure that the risks specific to children are addressed.
By doing this, we will go some way in helping to build a
climate-resilient world for children.”
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
32
BUSINESS REVIEW
CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY
LexisNexis Legal & Professional promotes justice through its
products and services. Its Rule of Law Resource Center is a free
online community covering topics like human rights, protecting
minority communities, and anti-human trafficking. During the
year, as lead sponsor of the World Justice Project, LexisNexis
contributed to the Project’s Rule of Law Index, a quantitative
assessment tool ranking 66 countries, and supported the Asia
Pacific Rule of Law Conference in Kuala Lumpur. LexisNexis
chaired the human trafficking panel at the International Bar
Association International Conference, helped advance the
Business Coalition Against Human Trafficking, and was primary
sponsor of the UK film premiere Not My Life, a documentary filmed
on five continents highlighting the wide-scale nature of the
problem; in conjunction with the premier, LexisNexis introduced
a handbook on human trafficking. During the year, LexisNexis
South Africa provided pro bono assistance to governments across
Africa by updating and publishing the laws/law reports of Kenya,
Nigeria, Malawi, Ghana, Mauritius and Swaziland, to facilitate
transparency in the administration of justice and law enforcement.
The winner of the $50,000 first prize was the Tagore-SenGupta
Foundation for a project to install 12 community-level arsenic
removal units in remote villages and schools in Cambodia where
arsenic groundwater contamination is rife. The arsenic removal
units use regenerable adsorbents and do not require electricity or
costly maintenance; the technology will provide local employment
in the construction and installation of units and in the caretaking
phase of the project. Second prize of $25,000 was awarded to
Jenna Forsyth, whose project focuses on low-resource chlorine
generation to address unsafe drinking water and poor sanitation in
the Nyanza province of western Kenya, one of the poorest regions
in the country. In partnership with the Program for Appropriate
Technology in Health, the school-based pilot involves a prototype
chlorine generator using salt, water and battery power to
generate chlorine for water disinfection. On a single battery
charge, the device can run for 200 cycles, generating 40,000 litres
of clean water. Both projects were featured in the Elsevier journal
Water Research. The 2012 Environmental Challenge was
launched in November 2011.
Reed Exhibitions’ trade shows provide platforms for supporting
our corporate responsibility focus areas. At the 2011 World Travel
Market, its global event for the travel industry, Reed Exhibitions
marked World Responsible Tourism Day with the Responsible
Tourism Awards, recognising sector initiatives in areas like
poverty reduction, low carbon transport and technology, and
conservation. Over the last eight years, Reed Exhibitions has
given free space at the London Book Fair to Book Aid International,
which annually provides over 500,000 books – including those
donated from across Reed Elsevier – to readers in the developing
world, enabling the charity to engage with a wide range of potential
book and financial donors.
Reed Business Information (RBI) uses the power of its brands to
aid communities. Variety, the leading entertainment industry news
source published by RBI, has established initiatives like the Power
of Youth to spur young entertainers to support philanthropic and
humanitarian causes, and to encourage their fans to do so as well.
Since its inception in 2007, Power of Youth has raised more than
$1 million to aid children; in 2011 beneficiaries included St. Jude
Children’s Research Hospital, Share Our Strength, and Alex’s
Lemonade Stand, a charity which fights childhood cancer, begun
by the child of a former Elsevier employee who lost her battle
with the disease in 2004. In conjunction with the Power of Youth,
Variety released its annual Youth Impact Report demonstrating
the impact young people make in the industry and in their
communities. Variety has built on the Power of Youth model with
the Power of Women and the Power of Comedy, highlighting how
celebrity can be used to beneficial effect.
Drawing on expertise across Reed Elsevier, in 2011 we awarded
prizes in the first Reed Elsevier Environmental Challenge to
projects that improve sustainable access to water where it is
presently at risk. We made relevant products available from our
businesses to over 100 registrants from more than 50 countries.
2011 OBjEctIVES
Progress
Complete RE Environmental
Challenge; launch plans
for 2012
Undertake UNICEF project on
the impact of climate change
on children
Further expansion of
Research4Life
Winners announced and
highlighted at World
Water Week reception
in Stockholm; 2012
Environmental Challenge
launched in November
Supported publication of
Children’s Vulnerability to
Climate Change; profiled in
key publications including
The Lancet and LexisNexis
Environment and Climate
Change Center
Enabled access to all
ScienceDirect content,
encompassing 9.5 million
articles/chapters; addition
of relevant legal material
from LexisNexis
2012 OBjEctIVES
Expand alternative energy product portfolio
Facilitate deeper country analysis of UNICEF climate
change and children report
Broaden reach of Reed Elsevier Environmental Challenge
Increase pro bono partnerships
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
33
2. Governance
3. People
The Reed Elsevier Code of Ethics and Business Conduct (Code) is
disseminated to every employee setting the standard for our
corporate and individual conduct. Encompassing topics such as
fair competition, anti-bribery, and human rights, it encourages
open and principled behaviour. Over 99% of current employees
completed online Code training by the close of 2011. In addition,
99% of employees in English speaking countries completed a data
privacy and security course and 5,000 employees completed
online training on fair competition with more employees
scheduled for both courses in 2012. In the year, all US managers
completed anti-harassment training. We are committed to
ensuring full compliance with the provisions of the UK Bribery Act,
and 99% of all employees completed anti-bribery training in 2011.
As a signatory of the United Nations Global Compact (UNGC) –
businesses must align their governance and operations with ten
principles related to human rights, labour, environment and
anti-corruption – we demonstrated leadership in 2011 by serving
on the Advisory Group for the United Kingdom, the UNGC Supply
Chain Advisory Group, and CEO Water Mandate Steering
Committee. In the year, we shared best practice in a European
local networks guide, provided video content on the UNGC for
lawyers, and held webinars on the UNGC for our suppliers and
for members of the UK network.
2011 OBjECtIVES
Progress
Code of Ethics and Business
Conduct course completion by
95% of all employees
Full alignment with Adequate
Procedures Guidance under
the UK Bribery Act; 95%
completion of anti-bribery
training by relevant employees
in higher risk roles and
geographies
Implementation of updated
records management policy
99% completion achieved
Alignment activities
included risk assessments,
intermediary due diligence,
and internal reviews by
internal audit; training
completed by 99% of all
employees globally
US policy and retention
schedule issued, along with
online policy review and
certification process for
employees
2012 OBjECtIVES
Completion of Code training by 100% of employees within
90 days of their employment start date
Continue bribery law compliance activities, with particular
reference to the UK Bribery Act and US Foreign Corrupt
Practices Act
Records Management Policy roll out to the UK and
other countries
Our 30,500 people are our strength. Our workforce is 54% female
and 46% male, with an average length of service of 8 years.
The Reed Elsevier Diversity and Inclusion (D&I) Statement
articulates our commitment to a diverse workforce and
environment that respects individuals and their contributions,
regardless of their gender, race, or other characteristics. In 2011,
we made progress on our D&I strategy, including by identifying
one senior champion from each of our business units to serve
on a D&I Advisory Group. They are supported by our wider D&I
Working Group, which met throughout the year to share internal
best practice and hear from experts on topics like unconscious
bias and creating a D&I culture. We encourage affinity groups,
like women’s forums, which provide support and mentoring and
encourage community involvement.
The Reed Elsevier Nominations Committee considers the
knowledge, experience and background of individual Board
directors. In the year, in line with the recommendations of the UK
Davies Review, the Committee announced a 2013 target of 30%
women on the Reed Elsevier NV Combined Board and 22% women
on the Reed Elsevier PLC Board.
Our employees have the right to a healthy and safe workplace
as outlined in the Reed Elsevier Health and Safety Policy. We
concentrate on areas of greatest risk, for example, warehouses,
events and exhibitions. However, as a primarily office based
company, our key impact areas are stress, slips/trips and falls.
To reduce our severity rate (lost days per 200,000 hours worked),
we conduct risk assessments, and work with a third party in the
US to assign a nurse case manager to each complex or severe
claim. We achieved a 35% reduction in the severity rate since 2008.
In the year, Ernst & Young benchmarked our health and safety
performance against organisations in our sector and others.
We are seen as a strong performer in 13 of 19 criteria, however
there were a number of areas where we can strengthen activities,
including by advancing our reporting on wellbeing performance
and its benefits to the business which we will address in the
year ahead.
Through a new US (where we have our largest concentration of
employees) programme, REACH, we promoted workplace
wellbeing through health screenings, online assessments, stress
awareness training, and weight loss and smoking cessation
programmes. We also introduced financial incentives for
participation in such activities.
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
34
BUSINESS REVIEW
CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY
4. Customers
In 2011, we surveyed more than 250,000 customers through Net
Promoter Score (measuring customer loyalty) and business
dashboard programmes. This allows us to deepen understanding
of their needs and drives forward a customer centric culture
across Reed Elsevier. Results, reviewed by the CEO and senior
managers and communicated to staff, illuminate where we are
doing well and where we must do better. To aid colleagues who
work with customers, we launched a webinar series, CR as a
Sales Tool, to help them articulate our commitment to CR and the
benefits it provides to our business such as reducing our risk and
strengthening our corporate reputation. We aim to expand
this with an online resource, the CR Sales Academy, in 2012.
In the year, the Reed Elsevier Editorial Policy was updated to
indicate the importance of making a clear distinction between fact
and opinion and user-generated or other content. It also states
that we encourage dialogue on our content, including through
social media.
We are committed to improving access to our products and
services for all users, regardless of physical ability. In 2011,
we reviewed key products including ScienceDirect, SciVal Experts,
SciVerse Hub, and MC Strategies Learning Management Software.
To review accessibility issues around Elsevier’s Article of the
Future, we set up a multi-university working group which met
regularly in the year to ensure new and advanced article pages
would be accessible to all, including disabled users who rely
on assistive technologies like screen readers. The Accessibility
Working Group held educational webinars with disabled users
and accessibility experts, and helped develop a new Elsevier-wide
Accessibility Policy. The Working Group also produced RE
Accessibility Matters to share accessibility information with
staff across the group. In the year, Elsevier’s Global Books Digital
Archive fulfilled 3,726 disability requests, about 40% through
AccessText.org, a service we helped establish.
2011 OBjECtIVES
Progress
Launch CR webinars on
non-financial performance to
support customer-facing staff
Consult on Reed Elsevier
Editorial Policy
Assess accessibility of key
product websites
Introduced CR as Sales
Tool webinars covering
the full range of Reed
Elsevier’s non-financial
performance
Policy updated following
review by editorial staff and
sector benchmarking
Reviews of ScienceDirect,
SciVal Experts, SciVerse
Hub, MC Strategies LMS
platform
2012 OBjECtIVES
Roll out updated Editorial Policy
Develop CR Sales Academy
Develop Reed Elsevier accessibility policy
We expanded our annual re:fit2win global competition in 2011,
adding swimming to the existing categories of walking, cycling
and running. Winning teams received $1,000 for the charity of their
choice. 84 teams took part across Reed Elsevier and ran, walked,
cycled and swam a total of 60,016 miles/96,586 kilometres.
2011 OBjECtIVES
Progress
Begin implementation of
diversity and inclusion (D&I)
strategy in key locations
New and improved people
sections of external and
internal websites
Benchmark health and safety
performance
Extend preventive care
programmes
D&I Advisory Group
formed; review of providers
for manager training pilot
and online course for all
employees; review of
group recruitment policies;
communicated with
senior leaders to share
D&I strategy
New people section on
www.reedelsevier.com and
revamp of content for new
global intranet launching
in 2012
Sector review by Ernst &
Young completed by
year end
New REACH programme
launched with 50 wellbeing
coordinators across US;
expanded workstation
assessments in UK through
Complywise
2012 OBjECtIVES
Undertake global employee opinion survey
Initiate diversity and inclusion training pilot
Capture and report on wellbeing performance and
its benefits
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
35
Case study
In 2010, Reed Elsevier launched a global fundraising
drive to raise funds for Plan International’s Because I’m a Girl
campaign, helping disadvantaged girls in India gain
educational opportunities and awareness of their legal and
employment rights. By the close of 2011, nearly $70,000
had been raised through staff fundraising and
company matching.
The Because I’m a Girl project in the urban slums of Delhi
addresses critical issues impeding education for children,
particularly girls. A key goal has been to create child friendly
schools that are inclusive, healthy, and protective for all
children, and where children, families, and communities
are involved. The project has focused on building the
capacity of teachers, headmasters, and other government
officials and creating a supportive environment that will
help to achieve better school retention rates and improve
academic performance. To date, the project has covered
three schools and seven child development centres.
Plan and its local partners have also helped the
communities and parents support children’s school
attendance and monitor the quality of the education they
receive. The results so far include over 600 girls and boys
enrolled in early child care and development centres, and
95% of children eligible for primary school enrolled. More
than 750 women and adolescent girls are now aware of
the government-sponsored centres available to them and
409 community leaders have received training on the
importance of educating girls. Plan estimates nearly 5,000
more girls will benefit in 2012, helping address issues that
continue to affect their attendance at school, such as poor
sanitation facilities and sexual harassment.
“An educated girl can take her decision appropriately.
She can handle family in a better way. She can also become
economically independent and oppose violence.”
Comment from Neetu, a women’s group member.
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
36
BUSINESS REVIEW
CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY
5. Community
6. Supply chain
We require our suppliers to meet the high standards we set for
ourselves. Our Supplier Code of Conduct stipulates adherence to
all laws and best practice in areas such as human rights, labour
and the environment. Through our Socially Responsible Supplier
(SRS) database, we tracked 457 critical, preferred, and strategic
suppliers, and those we deem high risk according to criteria from
the Corporate Executive Board’s Global Country Analysis Support
Tool, human trafficking data from the US State Department, and
rankings in the Environmental Performance Index (EPI) produced
by Yale University and Columbia University. The tracking list
changes year on year based on the number of suppliers we do
business with who meet the required criteria. We started 2011
with 37% of suppliers on the SRS tracking list as signatories to the
Supplier Code and reached 64% by year end. We have embedded
signing the Supplier Code into our e-sourcing tool as one of the
criteria for doing business with us and have an additional 1,700
signed codes.
Specialist supply chain auditors, Intertek, undertook 41 external
audits of high risk suppliers, with four deferred and completed in
January 2012. Any incidence of Supplier Code non-compliance
identified in the audit process triggers a corrective action plan
with supplier remediation required on all issues.
To engage suppliers on key issues, we introduced a Socially
Responsible Supplier Academy covering the audit process,
environmental management, diversity and inclusion, community
engagement, and the UN Global Compact, among other topics.
2011 OBjECtIVES
Progress
75% of key suppliers as
Supplier Code of Conduct
signatories
45 external audits of high risk
suppliers
Introduce Socially Responsible
Supplier Academy
Reached 292 or 64%; 1,701
other Code signatories
41 external audits completed;
four deferred to and
completed in January 2012
Held 24 classes on 11 topics
2012 OBjECtIVES
75% of key suppliers as Supplier Code of Conduct
signatories
50 external audits of high risk suppliers
Broaden Socially Responsible Supplier Academy
Reed Elsevier Cares, our global community programme,
promotes education for disadvantaged young people aligned
with our unique contributions as a business, and allows staff up to
two days off per year for their own community work. We donated
£2.4 million in cash (including through matching gifts) and the
equivalent of £7.9 million in products, services, and staff time
in 2011.
An international network of more than 150 RE Cares Champions
engage colleagues throughout the year in activities such as the
RE Cares Challenge, which rewards business sponsored
community engagement.
Each September we hold RE Cares Month to celebrate our
community activities and in 2011 launched a global RE Cares Day
which involved nearly 4,000 staff in local community projects.
Among these was a science publishing day which Elsevier Chennai
hosted for children in their final year of study at the St. Louis
School for the Deaf and Blind.
During the month we held our annual global book drive yielding
nearly 2,500 books for local and developing world readers, and
announced the winners of the first ever Recognising Those Who
Care Awards to highlight the contributions to RE Cares of eight
individuals and four teams. Individual winners from each of Reed
Elsevier’s business units took part in a Habitat for Humanity
project in Honduras, led by Y.S. Chi, Reed Elsevier’s head of
Corporate Affairs. The winning teams were from Elsevier San
Diego, LexisNexis Australia, Reed Exhibitions Norwalk, and RBI
UK who won cash prizes to donate to their chosen charities.
After the devastating earthquake and tsunami in Japan on
11 March 2011, we acted quickly to ensure the safety and
well-being of our staff in the country. Employees across Reed
Elsevier also responded, contributing more than $200,000 in
employee fundraising and matching gifts across the company to
support relief efforts. We also provided access to our expertise.
For example, Elsevier provided medical professionals responding
to the crisis with free access to MD Consult and First Consult,
allowing them to search Elsevier content at the point of care, with
online access via the First Consult iPhone/iPad app. In addition,
Reed Business Information’s Bankers' Almanac helped banking
clients publish alternative contact details for staff that relocated
in the aftermath of the earthquake.
2011 OBjECtIVES
Progress
Launch RE Cares recognition
awards
Launched Recognising
Those Who Care Awards
programme with senior
management participation
2012 OBjECtIVES
25% of employees volunteering through RE Cares
Reach 10,000 disadvantaged young people through
volunteering, in-kind and cash donations
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
37
7. Environment
2011 OBjECtIVES
Progress
Undertake data centre
efficiency study
20% of electricity from
renewables or offsets
Establish Green Team
Environmental Training
Academy
2012 OBjECtIVES
Conducted study at major
US data centre
Achieved 23%
First module, Why it
Matters, introduced
Launch updated environmental targets
25% of electricity from renewable energy or offsets
50% of key locations to achieve five or more RE
Environmental Standards
In 2011, we held extensive consultations with stakeholders to
review our environmental targets. Our updated targets reflect
our performance and key issues and can be found along with full
environmental performance details in the 2011 Corporate
Responsibility Report at reporting.reedelsevier.com/cr11
We worked with IBM on a data centre efficiency study at one of
our major US data centres in Ohio to identify opportunities for
environmental and financial improvements. We have developed
an implementation plan and are rolling out findings to other data
centres across the business.
Our Environmental Champions network, employee-led Green
Teams, and engagement through networks such as Publishers
Database for Responsible Ethical Paper Sourcing, inform
management plans to address our environmental impact. Among
them is the Reed Elsevier Environmental Standards programme,
which sets benchmark performance levels and inspires green
competition among offices. In 2011, 40 sites (31% of key locations)
achieved five or more standards attaining green status. Reed
Elsevier’s Chief Financial Officer sent an email to all staff
recognising these locations on World Environment Day and also
identified Green Heroes across the company who were nominated
by their peers for their environmental efforts. In the year, we
invited children of/known to staff to submit their ideas for solving
environmental challenges which resulted in an online publication,
Our Children’s Environment.
We have a positive environmental impact through our
environmental publications and services which spread good
practice, encourage debate, and aid researchers and decision
makers. The most recent results from independent Market
Analysis System show our share of citations in environmental
science represented 33% of the total market, and 67% in energy
and fuels.
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
KEy PERfORmaNCE INdICatORS
CO2 emissions (2006-2015)2
Total energy (2008-2015)
Travel emissions (2008-2015)
Water (2008-2015)
Waste recycled (2015)
Target
-10%
-5%
-5%
-10%
70%
Intensity achievement
to date1
Absolute achievement
to date
-19%
1%
-23%
-8%
n/a
8%
13%
-13%
3%
66%
2011
Absolute figure
182,186 tCO2e
269,626 MWh
35,451 tCO2e
456,795 m3
7,559 t
2011
Intensity figure
(Absolute/revenue £m)
30.36
44.93
5.91
76.11
1.26
1 The percentage variance between absolute performance divided by revenue in 2011 compared with absolute performance divided by revenue in start year.
2 Gross CO2e emissions (Scopes 1, 2 and Scope 3 business travel).
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
38
BUSINESS REVIEW
CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY
We achieved the following recognition in 2011:
Gold
Ethical Funds recognition
Included in Leadership Index
Scored in top 15% of companies
Ethibel Pioneer and Ethibel Excellence
Included
Sector leader
Sustainability Awards finalist
VBDO Supply Chain Award
Retained in Goldman Sachs Sustain fund of
“best managed companies around the globe
that will succeed on a sustainable basis”
Triodos Bank Sustainable Equity/
Bond Fund, first in publishing sector
THE FULL 2011 CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY REPORT IS AVAILABLE AT REPORtING.REEdElSEVIER.COm/CR11
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
39
Financial
review
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
In this section
40 Chief Financial Officer’s report
48 Principal risks
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
40
FInancIal REVIEW
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER’S REPORT
Chief Financial Officer’s report
Reported figures
Total revenue was £6,002m (2010: £6,055m). At constant
currencies, revenue was flat compared with the prior year,
but down 1% at reported exchange rates. Underlying revenue
growth was 2%, or 3% excluding the net cycling out of biennial
exhibitions. This compares with underlying revenue growth in the
prior year of 2%, or 1% excluding the biennial exhibition cycling.
The underlying revenue performance reflects the continued
portfolio development, new product introduction, expanded sales
& marketing, and other actions taken to improve the business.
Revenue performance across the business is described in the
Business Review.
ReCOnCiliatiOn OF RepORted Revenues yeaR-On-yeaR
yEaR to 31 dEcEmbER
2010 revenue
Underlying growth
Acquisitions
Disposals
Currency effects
2011 revenue
£m
Change
6,055
88
46
(156)
(31)
6,002
+2%
+1%
-3%
-1%
-1%
Reported operating profit, after amortisation of acquired
intangible assets, acquisition related costs and, in 2010,
exceptional restructuring costs was £1,205m (2010: £1,090m).
The increase reflects the improved trading performance
described in the Business Review and no exceptional
restructuring costs.
The amortisation charge in respect of acquired intangible assets,
including the share of amortisation in joint ventures, amounted to
£359m (2010: £349m).
Exceptional restructuring costs were nil (2010: £57m, in respect
of the restructuring of RBI). Acquisition related costs amounted
to £52m (2010: £50m), most significantly in respect of technology
integration within LexisNexis Risk Solutions. Disposals and other
non operating losses were £21m (2010: £46m), including the share
of disposal profits in joint ventures.
Net finance costs were lower at £235m (2010: £276m), reflecting
the strong free cash flow, term debt redemptions and the expiry
of interest rate swaps.
The reported profit before tax was £948m (2010: £768m). The
reported tax charge was £181m (2010: £120m). The reported net
profit attributable to the parent companies’ shareholders was
£760m (2010: £642m).
mark armour, Chief Financial Officer
2011 saw good financial progress
reflecting the improved trading
performance, strong cash flow
and capital discipline. earnings
grew well and post-tax returns
on invested capital increased to
11.2%. Reed elsevier’s balance
sheet remains strong with
acquisition activity funded by free
cash flow and disposals and net
debt 2.3 times adjusted eBitda.
REVEnuE
£m
5,334
4,584
6,071
6,055
6,002
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
41
Reported figures
Revenue
Operating profit
Profit before tax
Net profit
Net borrowings
adjusted figures
Operating profit
Operating margin
Profit before tax
Net profit
Operating cash flow
Operating cash flow conversion
Return on invested capital
2011
£m
2010
£m
Change
Change
at constant
currencies
Change
underlying
+2%
+5%
6,002
1,205
948
760
3,433
1,626
27.1%
1,391
1,060
1,515
93%
11.2%
6,055
1,090
768
642
3,455
-1%
+11%
+23%
+18%
+5%
1,555
25.7% +1.4%pts
+9%
1,279
+8%
983
1,519
0%
98%
10.6% +0.6%pts
0%
+8%
+20%
+15%
+4%
+7%
+6%
-1%
Reed Elsevier uses adjusted and underlying figures as additional performance measures. Adjusted figures are stated before the amortisation of acquired intangible assets,
exceptional restructuring (none in 2011) and acquisition related costs, disposal gains and losses and other non operating items, related tax effects and movements in deferred
taxation assets and liabilities that are not expected to crystallise in the near term and include the benefit of tax amortisation where available on acquired goodwill and
intangible assets. Adjusted operating profit is also grossed up to exclude the equity share of taxes in joint ventures. Exceptional restructuring costs in 2010 related to the
restructuring of the Reed Business Information business. Acquisition related costs relate to acquisition integration and professional and other transaction related fees and
adjustments to deferred and contingent consideration. Reconciliations between the reported and adjusted figures are set out in note 10 to the combined financial statements.
Underlying growth rates are calculated at constant currencies, and exclude the results of all acquisitions and disposals made both in the year and prior year and assets held for
sale. Constant currency growth rates are based on 2010 full year average and hedge exchange rates.
adjusted figures
Adjusted operating profit was £1,626m (2010: £1,555m), up 5%.
At constant currencies, adjusted operating profits were up 4%.
Underlying growth in adjusted operating profits was 5%.
Profit performance across the business is described in the
Business Review.
ReCOnCiliatiOn OF adjusted OpeRating pROFit
yeaR-On-yeaR
yEaR to 31 dEcEmbER
£m
Change
2010 adjusted operating profit
Underlying growth
Acquisitions
Disposals
Currency effects
2011 adjusted operating profit
1,555
73
8
(25)
15
1,626
+5%
+1%
-2%
+1%
+5%
Underlying costs were flat against the prior year, despite business
growth and additional spending on new product development and
sales & marketing, reflecting the continued focus on process
efficiency and procurement savings, and the benefit of prior year
restructuring. Total costs fell by 2% at constant currencies,
including acquisitions and disposals.
The overall adjusted operating margin at 27.1% was 1.4 percentage
points higher than last year. This included a 0.4 percentage point
benefit to margin of the multi-year subscription currency hedging
programme and other currency translation effects.
Changes in undeRlying Revenue, COst and pROFit
yEaR to 31 dEcEmbER 2011
Adjusted
operating
cost
Adjusted
operating
profit
Revenue
Elsevier
LexisNexis Risk Solutions
LexisNexis Legal & Professional
Reed Exhibitions
Reed Business Information
Reed Elsevier – underlying
+2%
+4%
+1%
0%
+1%
+2%
+1%
-1%
+1%
-1%
-2%
0%
+4%
+12%
-2%
+2%
+15%
+5%
adjustEd opERatIng pRoFIt
adjustEd opERatIng pRoFIt maRgIn
£m
1,379
1,137
1,570
1,555
1,626
24.8%
25.9%
25.9%
25.7%
27.1%
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
m
a
t
i
o
n
42
FInancIal REVIEW
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER’S REPORT
The net pension expense, before the net pension financing credit,
was £96m (2010: £80m), the increase reflecting the effect of lower
discount rates on the service cost and lower curtailment credits of
£9m (2010: £17m) from changes to plan design. The net pension
financing credit was £34m (2010: £26m) reflecting the higher
market value of scheme assets at the beginning of the year
compared with a year before. The share based and related
remuneration charge was £27m (2010: £11m).
Adjusted profit before tax was £1,391m (2010: £1,279m), up 9%,
and up 7% at constant currencies, reflecting the increase in
adjusted operating profits and the lower net interest expense.
ReCOnCiliatiOn OF adjusted and RepORted pROFit
BeFORe tax
yEaR to 31 dEcEmbER
Adjusted profit before tax
Amortisation of acquired intangible assets
Exceptional restructuring costs
Acquisition related costs
Reclassification of tax in joint ventures
Disposals and other non operating items
Reported profit before tax
2011
£m
1,391
(359)
–
(52)
(11)
(21)
948
2010
£m
1,279
(349)
(57)
(50)
(9)
(46)
768
The effective tax rate on adjusted profit before tax at 23.3% was
0.6 percentage points higher than in the prior year, reflecting the
geographic mix of the net increase in pre-tax profits. The effective
tax rate on adjusted profit before tax excludes movements in
deferred taxation assets and liabilities that are not expected to
crystallise in the near term, and includes the benefit of tax
amortisation where available on acquired goodwill and intangible
assets. This more closely aligns with cash tax costs over the
longer term. Adjusted operating profits and taxation are grossed
up for the equity share of taxes in joint ventures.
The application of tax law and practice is subject to some
uncertainty and amounts are provided in respect of this.
Issues are raised during the course of regular tax audits
and discussions including on the deductibility of interest on
cross-border financing are ongoing. Although the outcome
of open items cannot be predicted, no material impact on
results is expected from such issues.
The adjusted net profit attributable to shareholders of £1,060m
(2010: £983m) was up 8% and up 6% at constant currencies.
Cash flows
Adjusted operating cash flow was £1,515m (2010: £1,519m),
flat compared with the prior year or down 1% at constant
currencies. The rate of conversion of adjusted operating profits
into cash flow was 93% (2010: 98%). The lower level of cash flow
conversion reflects higher capital expenditure in 2011 and lower
depreciation due to disposals and accelerated depreciation
in 2010.
COnveRsiOn OF adjusted OpeRating pROFit intO Cash
yEaR to 31 dEcEmbER
Adjusted operating profit
Capital expenditure
Depreciation and amortisation of internally
developed intangible assets
Working capital and other items
Adjusted operating cash flow
Cash flow conversion
2011
£m
1,626
(350)
207
32
1,515
93%
2010
£m
1,555
(311)
237
38
1,519
98%
Capital expenditure included within adjusted operating cash flow
was £350m (2010: £311m), including £265m (2010: £228m) in
respect of capitalised development costs included within
internally generated intangible assets. The increase from the
prior year reflects increased investment in new products and
related infrastructure, particularly in the LexisNexis Legal &
Professional business.
Free cash flow – after interest and taxation – was £1,062m
(2010: £1,131m) before acquisition related spend and cash flows
relating to prior year exceptional restructuring programmes.
The decrease reflects higher taxes paid at £218m (2010: £101m)
before taking account of tax relief in respect of acquisition related
and exceptional restructuring spend, with 2010 benefiting from
tax repayments from prior years.
Payments made in respect of acquisition related costs amounted
to £38m (2010: £51m), principally in respect of the ChoicePoint
integration. Payments in respect of the prior year exceptional
restructuring programmes were £52m (2010: £99m), principally
relating to severance and vacant property costs. Net tax paid was
reduced by £5m (2010: £42m) in respect of acquisition related and
exceptional restructuring spend.
Free cash flow before dividends was £977m (2010: £1,023m).
Ordinary dividends paid to shareholders in the year, being the
2010 final and 2011 interim dividends, amounted to £497m (2010:
£483m). Free cash flow after dividends was £480m (2010: £540m).
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
43
ReCOnCiliatiOn OF net deBt yeaR-On-yeaR
yEaR to 31 dEcEmbER
Net debt at 1 January
Free cash flow post dividends
Acquisitions/disposals:
Disposals*
Acquisitions*
Net proceeds from share options exercised
Other
Currency translation
2011
£m
(3,455)
480
73
(555)
9
(9)
24
2010
£m
(3,931)
540
40
(39)
11
1
(77)
Net debt at 31 December
(3,433)
(3,455)
* Including cash tax relief/payment.
The ratio of net debt to adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest,
tax, depreciation and amortisation) at 31 December 2011 was
1.8x (2010: 1.9x), and 2.3x (2010: 2.5x) on a pensions and lease
adjusted basis.
liquidity
In May 2011, the first of two one year extension options was
exercised on the US$2.0bn committed bank facility taking the
maturity to June 2014. This back up facility provides security of
funding for US$2.0bn of short term debt to June 2014. In January
2012, $450m of US term debt maturing in June 2012 was
redeemed early, taking advantage of the make-whole election.
After taking account of committed bank facilities and available
cash resources, no borrowings mature until 2014. The strong
free cash flow of the business, the available resources and back
up facilities, and Reed Elsevier’s ability to access debt capital
markets are expected to provide sufficient liquidity to repay or
refinance borrowings as they mature.
Details on the treasury policies of the Combined Businesses are
on pages 46 and 47 and in note 18 to the Combined Financial
Statements.
FRee Cash FlOw
yEaR to 31 dEcEmbER
Adjusted operating cash flow
Interest paid
Tax paid
Free cash flow before exceptional spend
Restructuring/acquisition related costs*
Free cash flow before dividends
Ordinary dividends
Free cash flow post dividends
* Including cash tax relief/repayments.
Funding
2011
£m
1,515
(235)
(218)
1,062
(85)
977
(497)
480
2010
£m
1,519
(287)
(101)
1,131
(108)
1,023
(483)
540
debt
Net borrowings at 31 December 2011 were £3,433m, a decrease
of £22m since 31 December 2010. Excluding currency translation
effects, net debt increased by £2m, with acquisitions funded from
free cash flow and disposals. Expressed in US dollars, net
borrowings at 31 December 2011 were $5,325m, a decrease
of $62m since 31 December 2010.
Gross borrowings after fair value adjustments at 31 December
2011 amounted to £4,282m (2010: £4,302m). The fair value of
related derivative assets was £123m (2010: £105m). Cash
balances totalled £726m (2010: £742m).
As at 31 December 2011, after taking into account interest rate
and currency derivatives, a total of 69% of Reed Elsevier’s gross
borrowings were at fixed rates with a weighted average remaining
life of 4.7 years and interest rate of 5.8%. Taking into account the
cash balances and the fair value of derivatives, as at 31 December
2011, 86% of Reed Elsevier’s net borrowings were at fixed rates.
Cash spend on acquisitions, investments and the buy out of
non-controlling interests was £557m, including debt acquired
of £18m and deferred consideration of £25m payable on past
acquisitions. Net cash proceeds from disposals was £80m. Net
tax paid was increased by £5m (2010: £50m repayment) in respect
of acquisitions and disposals. Net proceeds from the exercise of
share options were £9m (2010: £11m). No share repurchases were
made by the parent companies in the year (2010: nil) and no shares
of the parent companies were purchased by the employee benefit
trust (2010: nil).
adjustEd opERatIng cash FloW conVERsIon
tERm dEbt matuRIty pRoFIlE
97%
102%
99%
98%
93%
$m
594
1,015
921
950
620
500
286
551
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020 >2021
m
a
t
i
o
n
44
FInancIal REVIEW
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER’S REPORT
Capital employed and returns
elsevier Reed Finance Bv
summaRy BalanCe sheet
as at 31 dEcEmbER
Goodwill and acquired intangible assets
Internally developed intangible assets
Investments and net assets held for sale
Property, plant and equipment
Net pension deficit
Working capital
2011
£m
7,628
595
215
288
(242)
(1,060)
2010
£m
7,429
469
184
291
(170)
(1,000)
structure
Elsevier Reed Finance BV, the Dutch parent company of the
Elsevier Reed Finance BV group (“ERF”), is directly owned by
Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV. ERF provides treasury,
finance, intellectual property and reinsurance services to the
Reed Elsevier Group plc businesses through its subsidiaries in
Switzerland: Elsevier Finance SA (“EFSA”), Elsevier Properties
SA (“EPSA”) and Elsevier Risks SA (“ERSA”). These three Swiss
companies are organised under one Swiss holding company,
which is in turn owned by Elsevier Reed Finance BV.
Capital employed
7,424
7,203
Net capital employed was £7,424m (2010: £7,203m) at
31 December 2011, an increase of £221m.
The carrying value of goodwill and acquired intangible assets
increased by £199m, reflecting acquisitions in 2011 less the annual
amortisation charge. An amount of £311m was capitalised in the
year as acquired intangible assets and £300m as goodwill.
Development costs of £270m (2010: £228m) were capitalised
within internally developed intangible assets most notably
investment in new products and related infrastructure in the
LexisNexis Legal & Professional business.
Net pension obligations, i.e. pension obligations less pension
assets, at 31 December 2011 were £242m (31 December 2010:
£170m). This included a net deficit of £87m (31 December 2010:
£24m) in respect of funded schemes, which were on average 98%
funded at the end of the year. The increase in the overall net deficit
reflects a reduction in average discount rates at the end of the year
compared with the end of the prior year.
Negative working capital increased by £60m, reflecting an
increase in deferred revenue on subscription growth and lower
physical inventory.
Gross capital employed at 31 December 2011 was £11,968m
(2010: £11,661m) after adding back cumulative accumulated
amortisation and impairment of acquired intangible assets and
goodwill. The increase of £307m principally reflects acquisition
activity and investments in new products and infrastructure.
The return on average capital employed in the year was 11.2%
(2010: 10.6%). This is based on adjusted operating profits for the
year, less tax at the effective rate, and the average of the capital
employed at the beginning and end of the year, retranslated at
the average exchange rates, adjusted to exclude the gross up
to goodwill in respect of deferred tax liabilities established on
acquisitions in relation to intangible assets. The increase in
the return reflects the improved trading performance, strong
cash flow and capital efficiency.
activities
EFSA is the principal treasury centre for the Reed Elsevier
combined businesses. It is responsible for all aspects of treasury
advice and support for Reed Elsevier Group plc’s businesses
operating in Continental Europe, Latin America, the Pacific Rim,
India, China and certain other territories, and undertakes foreign
exchange and derivatives dealing services for the whole of Reed
Elsevier. EFSA also arranges or directly provides Reed Elsevier
Group plc businesses with financing for acquisitions, product
development and other general requirements and manages cash
pools, investments and debt programmes on their behalf.
EPSA actively manages intellectual property assets including
trademarks such as The Lancet and databases such as Reaxys and
PharmaPendium. In 2011 it continued to strengthen its position
as a centre of excellence in the management and development of
intellectual property assets. ERSA is responsible for reinsurance
activities for Reed Elsevier.
major developments
In 2011, EFSA was active in arranging the financing and foreign
currency contracts for Reed Elsevier Group plc companies related
to cross border dividends and acquisitions. It negotiated and
advised Reed Elsevier Group plc companies on a number of
banking and cash management arrangements in Continental
Europe and Asia and continued to advise on treasury matters,
including interest rate, foreign currency and certain other
financial exposures.
The average balance of cash under management by EFSA in 2011,
on behalf of Reed Elsevier Group plc and its parent companies,
was approximately US$0.8bn (2010: US$0.8bn).
liabilities and assets
At 31 December 2011, 91% (2010: 84%) of ERF’s gross assets
were held in US dollars and 9% (2010: 15%) in euros, including
US$8.6bn (2010: US$8.7bn) and €0.6bn (2010: €0.6bn) in loans
to Reed Elsevier Group plc subsidiaries. Loans made to
Reed Elsevier Group plc businesses are funded from equity,
long term debt of US$2bn and short term debt of US$0.5bn
backed by committed bank facilities. Sources of long term
debt include Swiss domestic public bonds, bilateral term loans,
private placements and syndicated bank facilities. Short term
debt is primarily derived from euro and US commercial
paper programmes.
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
45
2011
£m
389
561
2010
£m
327
520
32.4p
46.7p
21.55p
27.3p
43.4p
20.40p
€m
437
610
€m
376
575
€0.59
€0.83
€0.436
€0.51
€0.78
€0.412
Change
at constant
currencies
+6%
+6%
+6%
+6%
Change
+19%
+8%
+19%
+8%
+6%
+16%
+6%
+16%
+6%
+6%
Dividend cover, based on adjusted earnings per share and the
total interim and proposed final dividends for the year, is 2.2 times
(2010: 2.1x) for Reed Elsevier PLC and 1.9 times (2010: 1.9x) for
Reed Elsevier NV. The dividend policy of the parent companies is,
subject to currency considerations, to grow dividends broadly in
line with adjusted earnings per share whilst maintaining dividend
cover (being the number of times the annual dividend is covered
by the adjusted earnings per share) of at least two times over the
longer term.
parent companies
Reed Elsevier plc
Reported net profit
Adjusted net profit
Reported earnings per share
Adjusted earnings per share
Ordinary dividend per share
Reed Elsevier nV
Reported net profit
Adjusted net profit
Reported earnings per share
Adjusted earnings per share
Ordinary dividend per share
For the parent companies, Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier
NV, adjusted earnings per share were up 8% at 46.7p (2010: 43.4p)
and 6% at €0.83 (2010: €0.78) respectively. At constant rates of
exchange, the adjusted earnings per share of both companies
increased by 6%.
The reported earnings per share for Reed Elsevier PLC
shareholders was 32.4p (2010: 27.3p) and for Reed Elsevier NV
shareholders was €0.59 (2010: €0.51). The increase reflects the
improved trading performance, no exceptional restructuring
costs and lower net interest expense.
The equalised final dividends proposed by the respective Boards
are 15.9p per share for Reed Elsevier PLC and €0.326 per share for
Reed Elsevier NV, 6% and 8% higher respectively compared with
the prior year final dividends. This gives total dividends for the
year of 21.55p (2010: 20.40p) and €0.436 (2010: €0.412), both up
6%. (The difference in growth rates in the equalised final
dividends, and in the earlier interim dividends, reflects changes in
the euro: sterling exchange rate since the respective prior year
dividend announcement dates.)
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
adjustEd Eps gRoWth at constant cuRREncIEs
dIVIdEnds
Reed Elsevier PLC
pence
Reed Elsevier NV
€
20.40
21.55
0.412
0.436
+15%
+12%
2007
2008
-9%
2009
-6%
2010
+6%
2011
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
2010
2011
2010
2011
m
a
t
i
o
n
46
FInancIal REVIEW
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER’S REPORT
accounting policies
The combined financial statements are prepared in accordance
with International Financial Reporting Standards as endorsed
by the European Union and as issued by the International
Accounting Standards Board following the accounting policies
shown on pages 88 to 93. The most significant accounting policies
in determining the financial condition and results of the combined
businesses, and those requiring the most subjective or complex
judgement, relate to the valuation of goodwill and intangible
assets, share based remuneration, pensions, litigation, taxation
and property provisioning. Further detail is provided in the
accounting policies on pages 91 to 93.
treasury policies
The Boards of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV have
requested that Reed Elsevier Group plc and Elsevier Reed Finance
BV have due regard to the best interests of Reed Elsevier PLC and
Reed Elsevier NV shareholders in the formulation of treasury
policies. Financial instruments are used to finance the Reed
Elsevier businesses and to hedge transactions. Reed Elsevier’s
businesses do not enter into speculative transactions. The main
treasury risks faced by Reed Elsevier are liquidity risk, interest
rate risk, foreign currency risk and credit risk. The Boards of the
parent companies agree overall policy guidelines for managing
each of these risks and the Boards of Reed Elsevier Group plc and
Elsevier Finance SA agree policies (in line with parent company
guidelines) for their respective business and treasury centres.
A summary of these policies is given below.
capital and liquidity management
The capital structure is managed to support Reed Elsevier’s
objective of maximising long term shareholder value through
appropriate security of funding, ready access to debt and capital
markets, cost effective borrowing and flexibility to fund business
and acquisition opportunities whilst maintaining appropriate
leverage to optimise the cost of capital.
Over the long term Reed Elsevier targets cash flow conversion
(the proportion of adjusted operating profits converted into cash)
and credit metrics to reflect this aim and that are consistent with a
solid investment grade credit rating. Levels of net debt should not
exceed those consistent with such a rating other than for relatively
short periods of time, for instance following an acquisition. The
principal metrics utilised are free cash flow (after interest, tax and
dividends) to net debt, net debt to EBITDA (earnings before
interest, taxation, depreciation and amortisation) and EBITDA to
net interest and these metrics are monitored and reported to
senior management and the board representatives on a quarterly
basis. Cash flow conversion of 90% or higher is consistent with the
rating target. The cash flow conversion in 2011 was 93% and as at
31 December 2011 net debt to adjusted EBITDA was 2.3x (2010:
2.5x) on a pensions and lease adjusted basis.
Reed Elsevier’s use of cash over the longer term reflects these
objectives through a progressive dividend policy, selective
acquisitions and, from time to time when conditions suggest,
share repurchases whilst retaining the balance sheet strength to
maintain access to the most cost effective sources of borrowing
and to support Reed Elsevier’s strategic ambition in evolving
publishing and information markets.
The balance of long term debt, short term debt and committed
bank facilities is managed to provide security of funding, taking
into account the cash generation of the business and the uncertain
size and timing of acquisition spend. Reed Elsevier maintains
a range of borrowing facilities and debt programmes from a
variety of sources to fund its requirements at short notice and at
competitive rates. The significance of Reed Elsevier Group plc’s
US operations means that the majority of debt is denominated in
US dollars. Policy requires that no more than US$1.5bn of term
debt issues should mature in any 12-month period and no more
than US$3.0bn in any 36-month period. In addition, minimum
levels of borrowings with maturities over three and five years are
specified, depending on the level of net debt and free cash flow.
From time to time, Reed Elsevier may redeem term debt early or
repurchase outstanding debt in the open market depending on
market conditions.
There were no changes to Reed Elsevier’s long term approach
to capital and liquidity management during the year.
Interest rate exposure management
Reed Elsevier’s interest rate exposure management policy is
aimed at reducing the exposure of the combined businesses to
changes in interest rates. The proportion of interest expense that
is fixed on net debt is determined by reference to the level of net
interest cover. Reed Elsevier uses fixed rate term debt, interest
rate swaps, forward rate agreements and interest rate options to
manage the exposure. Interest rate derivatives are used only to
hedge an underlying risk and no net market positions are held.
After taking into account interest rate and currency derivatives,
at 31 December 2011 interest expense was fixed on an average
of £2.4bn of forecast debt for the next 24 months. This fixed rate
debt reduces to £2.0bn by the end of 2013 and reduces further
thereafter with all but £0.4bn of fixed rate term debt (not swapped
to floating rate) having matured by the end of 2019.
At 31 December 2011, fixed rate term debt (not swapped to floating
rate) amounted to £2.4bn (2010: £2.5bn) and had a weighted average
life remaining of 5.7 years (2010: 6.4 years) and a weighted average
interest rate of 6.5% (2010: 6.4%). Interest rate derivatives in place
at 31 December 2011, which fix the interest cost on an additional
£0.6bn (2010: £0.6bn) of variable rate debt, have a weighted average
maturity of 0.8 years (2010: 1.1 years) and a weighted average
interest rate of 3.2% (2010: 4.2%).
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
47
Foreign currency exposure management
Translation exposures arise on the earnings and net assets of
business operations in countries other than those of each parent
company. These exposures are hedged, to a significant extent, by a
policy of denominating borrowings in currencies where significant
translation exposures exist, most notably US dollars. Currency
exposures on transactions denominated in a foreign currency
are required to be hedged using forward contracts. In addition,
recurring transactions and future investment exposures may be
hedged, in advance of becoming contractual. The precise policy
differs according to the specific circumstances of the individual
businesses. Highly predictable future cash flows may be covered
for transactions expected to occur during the next 24 months (50
months for Elsevier science and medical subscription businesses)
within limits defined according to the period before the transaction
is expected to become contractual. Cover takes the form of foreign
exchange forward contracts.
As at 31 December 2011, the amount of outstanding foreign
exchange cover against future transactions was £1.3bn
(2010: £1.1bn).
credit risk
Reed Elsevier has a credit exposure for the full principal amount
of cash and cash equivalents held with individual counterparties.
In addition, it has a credit risk from the potential non performance
by counterparties to financial instruments; this credit risk
normally being restricted to the amounts of any hedge gain and
not the full principal amount being hedged. Credit risks are
controlled by monitoring the credit quality of counterparties,
principally licensed commercial banks and investment banks
with strong long term credit ratings, and the amounts outstanding
with each of them.
Reed Elsevier has treasury policies in place which do not allow
concentrations of risk with individual counterparties and do not
allow significant treasury exposures with counterparties which
are rated lower than A/A2 by Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s or Fitch.
At 31 December 2011, cash and cash equivalents totalled £726m,
of which 98% was held with banks rated A/A2 or better.
mark armour
Chief Financial Officer
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
48
FInancIal REVIEW
PRINCIPAL RISKS
principal risks
Reed Elsevier has established risk management practices that
are embedded into the operations of the businesses, based on
the framework in internal control issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organisations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
The principal risks facing Reed Elsevier, which have been
considered by the Audit Committees and Boards, are described
below. It is not possible to identify every risk that could affect our
businesses, and the actions taken to mitigate the risks described
below cannot provide absolute assurance that a risk will not
materialise and/or adversely affect our business or financial
performance. Our risk management and internal control
processes are described in the Structure and Corporate
Governance section. A description of the business and a
discussion of factors affecting performance is set out in the Chief
Executive Officer’s report and Business Review. Financial risks
are discussed in the Chief Financial Officer’s report and in note 18
to the combined financial statements. Our approach to managing
environmental and other non financial risks is set out in the
Business Review and the separate Corporate Responsibility
Report. Important specific risks identified include:
ExtERnal RIsks
Risk
description and impact
mitigation
Economy and
market
conditions
Demand for our products and services may be
impacted by factors such as the economic environment
in the US, Europe and other major economies, and
government funding.
Intellectual
property rights
data resources
paid
subscriptions
Our products and services are largely comprised of
intellectual property content delivered through a variety
of media. We rely on trademark, copyright, patent and
other intellectual property laws to establish and protect
our proprietary rights in these products and services.
There is a risk that our proprietary rights could be
challenged, limited, invalidated or circumvented which
may impact demand for and pricing of our products
and services.
A number of our businesses rely extensively upon
content and data from external sources. Data is
obtained from public records, governmental
authorities, customers and other information
companies, including competitors. The disruption or
loss of data sources, because of changes in the law or
because data suppliers decide not to supply them, could
adversely affect our products and services if we were
unable to arrange for substitute sources in a timely
manner or at all.
Our scientific, technical and medical (STM) primary
publications, like those of most of our competitors,
are published on a paid subscription basis. There is
continuous debate in the government, academic
and library communities, which are the principal
customers for our STM publications, regarding
whether such publications should be funded
instead through fees charged to authors and from
governmental and other subsidies or made freely
available after a period following publication. If these
methods of STM publishing are widely adopted or
mandated, it could adversely affect our revenue
from paid subscription publications.
Our businesses are focused on professional markets
which have generally been more resilient in periods
of economic downturn. We deliver information
solutions, many on a subscription basis, which
are important to our customers’ effectiveness
and efficiency.
We actively engage in developing and promoting the
legal protection of intellectual property rights. In our
businesses, subscription contracts with customers
contain provisions as to the use of proprietary content.
We are also vigilant as to the use of our content and,
as appropriate, take legal action to challenge illegal
distribution sources.
We seek as far as possible to have proprietary content.
Where content is supplied to us by third parties, we seek
to have contracts which provide mutual commercial
benefit. We also maintain an active dialogue with
regulatory authorities on privacy and other data related
issues, and promote, with others, the responsible use
of data.
We engage extensively with stakeholders in the STM
community to better understand their needs and deliver
value to them. While we adopt a number of publishing
models and continue to experiment, through the
principal paid subscription model we encourage the
submission of research output by scientists without the
penalty of publishing cost. We focus on the integrity and
quality of research through the editorial and peer review
process; we invest in efficient editorial and distribution
platforms and in innovation in platforms and tools to
make content and data more accessible and actionable;
and we ensure vigilance on plagiarism and the long term
preservation of research findings.
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
49
stRatEgIc RIsks
Risk
description and impact
mitigation
customer
acceptance of
products
competition
acquisitions
Reed Elsevier’s businesses are dependent on the
continued acceptance by our customers of our
products and services and the value placed on them.
Failure to meet evolving customer needs could impact
demand for our products and consequently adversely
affect our revenue.
We are focused on the needs and economics of our
customers and seek to provide content and innovative
solutions that help them achieve better outcomes and
enhance productivity.
Our businesses operate in highly competitive
markets. These markets continue to change in
response to technological innovations, changing
legislation, regulatory changes, the entrance of new
competitors and other factors. Failure to anticipate
market trends could impact the competitiveness of our
products and services and consequently adversely
affect our revenue.
To remain competitive we continuously invest
significant resources in our products and services,
and the infrastructure to support them. We gain
insights into our markets, evolving customers’ needs
and opportunities, the potential application of new
technologies and business models, and the actions
of competitors, and these insights inform our market
strategies and operational priorities.
We acquire businesses to reshape and strengthen our
portfolio. If we are unable to generate the anticipated
benefits such as revenue growth, synergies and/or
cost savings associated with these acquisitions this
could adversely affect return on invested capital and
financial condition.
Our acquisitions are made within the framework of our
overall strategy. We have a well formulated process for
reviewing and executing acquisitions and for managing
the post acquisition integration. This process is
underpinned with clear strategic, financial and ethical
acquisition criteria. We closely monitor the
performance of acquisitions.
opERatIonal RIsks
Risk
description and impact
mitigation
technology
failure
data security
supply chain
dependencies
Our businesses are increasingly dependent on
electronic platforms and networks, primarily the
internet, for delivery of products and services. They
could be adversely affected if our electronic delivery
platforms and networks experience a significant failure,
interruption, or security breach.
We have established procedures for the protection of
our technology assets. These include the development
of business continuity plans, including IT disaster
recovery plans and back-up delivery systems, to
reduce business disruption in the event of a major
technology failure.
Our businesses maintain databases and information
online, including personal information. Breaches of
our data security or failure to comply with applicable
legislation or regulatory or contractual requirements
could damage our reputation and expose us to risk of
loss or litigation and increased regulation.
We have established data privacy and security
programmes. We test and re-evaluate our procedures
and controls with the aim of ensuring that personal
data is protected and that we comply with relevant
legislation, regulatory and contractual requirements.
Our organisational and operational structures have
increased dependency on outsourced and offshored
functions. Poor performance or failure of third parties
to whom we have outsourced activities could adversely
affect our business performance, reputation and
financial condition.
We select our vendors with care and establish service
level agreements that we closely monitor, including
through key performance indicators and targeted
supplier audits. We have also developed business
continuity plans to reduce disruption in the event of
a major failure by a vendor.
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
50
FInancIal REVIEW
PRINCIPAL RISKS
FInancIal RIsks
Risk
pensions
tax
treasury
description and impact
mitigation
We have well established professional management
of our pension schemes and we focus on maintaining
appropriate asset allocation and plan designs. We
review our funding requirements on a regular basis with
the assistance of independent actuaries and ensure that
the funding plans are sufficient to meet future liabilities.
We have clear and consistent tax policies and tax
matters are dealt with by a professional tax function,
supported by external tax advisors. We maintain an
open dialogue with the relevant tax authorities and are
vigilant in ensuring that we comply with tax legislation.
Reed Elsevier’s approach to funding and management
of interest rate and foreign currency exposures is
described on pages 46 and 47. The approach to the
management of financial risks is described in note 18
to the combined financial statements.
We operate a number of pension schemes around the
world, the largest schemes being of the defined benefit
type in the UK, the US and the Netherlands. The assets
and obligations associated with defined benefit pension
schemes are particularly sensitive to changes in the
market values of assets and the market related
assumptions used to value scheme liabilities. Adverse
changes to inter alia asset values, discount rates or
inflation could increase future pension costs and
funding requirements.
Our businesses operate worldwide and our earnings are
subject to taxation in many differing jurisdictions and at
differing rates. We seek to organise our affairs in a tax
efficient manner, taking account of the jurisdictions in
which we operate. However, tax laws that apply to Reed
Elsevier businesses may be amended by the relevant
authorities or interpreted differently which could
adversely affect our reported results.
The Reed Elsevier combined financial statements
are expressed in pounds sterling and are subject to
movements in exchange rates on the translation of the
financial information of businesses whose operational
currencies are other than sterling. The US is our most
important market and, accordingly, significant
fluctuations in the US dollar exchange rate could
significantly affect our reported results.
Macro economic, political and market conditions may
also adversely affect the availability of short and long
term funding, volatility of interest rates, currency
exchange rates and inflation.
REputatIonal RIsks
Risk
Ethics
Environmental
description and impact
mitigation
As a world leading provider of professional information
solutions to the Science, Medical, Risk, Legal and
Business sectors we are expected to adhere to high
standards of independence and ethical conduct.
A breach of generally accepted ethical business
standards could adversely affect our business
performance, reputation and financial condition.
The Reed Elsevier Code of Ethics and Business Conduct
is provided to every employee and is supported by
training on specific topics. It encompasses such topics
as fair competition, anti-bribery and human rights and
it encourages open and principled behaviour. We also
have well established processes for reporting and
investigating unethical conduct. Our major suppliers
are required to adopt our Supplier Code of Conduct.
Reed Elsevier and its businesses have an impact on
the environment, principally through the use of energy
and water, waste generation and, in our supply chain,
through our paper use and print and production
technologies. Failure to manage our environmental
impact could adversely affect our reputation.
We are committed to reducing these impacts by limiting
resource use and by efficiently employing sustainable
materials and technologies. We require our major
suppliers and contractors to meet the same objectives.
We seek to ensure that Reed Elsevier’s businesses are
compliant with all relevant environmental regulation.
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
51
Governance
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
In this section
52 Board Directors
54 Chairman’s introduction to
corporate governance
55 Structure and corporate governance
62 Report of the Nominations Committee
63 Directors’ remuneration report
80 Report of the Audit Committees
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
52
governance
board directors
Board Directors
Executive Directors
Non-Executive Directors
erik engstrom (48)
chief executive officer
anthony Habgood (65)
chairman
■ ● ◆
Mark elliott (62)
chairman of the remuneration committee
■ ● ◆
appointed: chief executive officer since 2009.
Joined reed elsevier as chief executive officer
of elsevier in 2004
Nationality: swedish
Past appointments: Prior to joining reed
elsevier was a partner at General atlantic
Partners. before that was President and chief
operating officer of random House inc and,
before its merger with random House,
President and chief executive officer of bantam
doubleday dell, North america. began his
career as a consultant with McKinsey. served
as a non-executive director of eniro ab and
svenska cellulosa aktiebolaget sca.
education: Holds a bsc from stockholm school
of economics, an Msc from the royal institute of
technology in stockholm, and gained an Mba
from Harvard business school as a Fulbright
scholar.
appointed: 2009
Nationality: british
other appointments: chairman of Whitbread plc
and of Preqin Holding Limited.
Past appointments: chairman of bunzl plc and
of Mölnlycke Healthcare Limited and served as
chief executive of bunzl plc, chief executive of
tootal Group plc and a director of the boston
consulting Group inc. Formerly non-executive
director of Geest plc; Marks and spencer plc;
National Westminster bank plc; Powergen plc;
and sVG capital plc.
education: Holds an Ma in economics from
cambridge University and an Ms in industrial
administration from carnegie Mellon
University. He is a visiting Fellow at
oxford University.
appointed: 2003
Nationality: american
other appointments: chairman of QinetiQ Group
plc and a non-executive director of G4s plc.
Past appointments: Until his retirement in 2008,
was general manager of ibM Global solutions,
having held a number of positions with ibM,
including managing director of ibM europe,
Middle east and africa.
Mark armour (57)
chief Financial officer
robert Polet (56)
Non-executive director
■ ◆
sir david reid (65)
senior independent director
▲ ■ ● ◆
appointed: 1996
Nationality: british
other appointments: Non-executive director
of sabMiller plc.
Past appointments: Prior to joining reed
elsevier as deputy chief Financial officer in
1995, was a partner in Price Waterhouse.
education: Holds an Ma in engineering from
cambridge University and qualified as a
chartered accountant.
appointed: 2007
Nationality: dutch
other appointments: chairman of safilo Group
s.p.a. and a non-executive director of: Philip
Morris international inc; Wilderness Holdings
Limited; and William Grant & sons Limited.
Member of the supervisory board of Nyenrode
Foundation.
Past appointments: President and chief
executive officer of Gucci Group from 2004
to 2011, having previously spent 26 years at
Unilever working in a variety of marketing and
senior executive positions throughout the world,
including president of Unilever’s Worldwide ice
cream and Frozen Foods division.
appointed: 2003
Nationality: british
other appointments: chairman of
intertek Group plc.
Past appointments: Was chairman of tesco PLc
from 2004 to 2011, having previously been
executive deputy chairman until december
2003, and Finance director from 1985 to 1997.
Formerly chairman of Kwik-Fit and a
non-executive director of de Vere PLc,
Legal & General Group plc and Westbury PLc.
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
53
Adrian Hennah (54)
Non-executive Director
▲◆
Lisa Hook (53)
Non-executive Director
▲ ● ◆
Appointed: April 2011
Nationality: British
Other appointments: Chief Financial Officer
of Smith & Nephew plc.
Past appointments: Chief Financial Officer of
invensys plc, having previously held various
senior finance and management positions with
GlaxoSmithKline for 18 years.
Appointed: 2006
Nationality: American
Other appointments: President and Chief
executive Officer of Neustar inc and a director
of the Ocean Foundation.
Past appointments: President and Chief
executive Officer at Sun Rocket inc. Before that
she was President of AOL Broadband, Premium
and Developer Services. Prior to joining AOL,
she was a founding partner at Brera Capital
Partners LLC. Previously Chief Operating
Officer of time Warner telecommunications
and has served as senior advisor to the Federal
Communications Commission Chairman and
a senior counsel to Viacom Cable.
Marike van Lier Lels (52)
Member of the Supervisory Board
of Reed elsevier NV
◆
Appointed: 2010
Nationality: Dutch
Other appointments: Member of the supervisory
boards of KPN NV, USG People NV, tKH Group
NV and Maersk BV. A member of various Dutch
governmental advisory boards.
Past appointments: executive Vice President
and Chief Operating Officer of the Schiphol
Group. Prior to joining Schiphol Group, was a
member of the executive board of Deutsche
Post euro express and held various senior
positions with Nedlloyd.
Ben van der Veer (60)
Chairman of the Audit Committees
▲ ● ◆
Appointed: 2009
Nationality: Dutch
Other appointments: Member of the
supervisory boards of AeGON NV, tomtom NV,
Siemens Nederland NV and Koninklijke
FrieslandCampina NV.
Past appointments: Chairman of the executive
board of KPMG in the Netherlands and a
member of the management committee of the
KPMG international board until his retirement
in 2008, having joined KPMG in 1976.
Board committee Membership
▲
Audit Committees: Reed elsevier Group plc, Reed
elsevier PLC and Reed elsevier NV
■ Remuneration Committee: Reed elsevier Group plc
●
Nominations Committee: joint Reed elsevier PLC
and Reed elsevier NV
Corporate Governance Committee: joint Reed
elsevier PLC and Reed elsevier NV
◆
Both of the executive directors are directors of Reed
elsevier Group plc and Reed elsevier PLC and
members of the executive Board of Reed elsevier NV.
Mrs van Lier Lels is a member of the Supervisory Board
of Reed elsevier NV. All of the other non-executive
directors are directors of Reed elsevier Group plc and
Reed elsevier PLC and members of the Supervisory
Board of Reed elsevier NV.
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
54
governance
Chairman’s introduCtion to Corporate governanCe
Chairman’s introduction to corporate governance
Reed Elsevier is committed to
applying the highest standards
of corporate governance in
whichever jurisdiction it
operates.
the Board of reed elsevier group plc, reed elsevier pLC and the
Combined Board of reed elsevier nv (the Boards) are responsible
for the governance of reed elsevier and have put in place
procedures which provide accountability, transparency, probity
and a focus on the sustainable success of reed elsevier over the
longer term.
i believe that the Boards and their committees have a good
combination of skills and experience and we continue to review
the balance of the Boards in our succession planning to ensure
there is an appropriate balance of skills, experience,
independence, knowledge and diversity on the Board.
the reports of the committees on the following pages in this
section explain the systems in place to ensure compliance with
applicable corporate governance policies in the areas of board
composition (including diversity) and assessment of board
effectiveness, remuneration policy, systems of internal control
and risk management and relations with shareholders.
the main areas of focus concerning corporate governance during
2011 were:
the Boards considered the changes introduced by the uK
Corporate governance Code published in may 2010, and i am
pleased to report that reed elsevier fully complied with the
new Code during the year.
the Boards considered their policy on board diversity,
including female representation on the Boards, and in
september 2011 announced their aspirational goals regarding
the percentage of women they aim to have on the Boards.
the nominations Committee has continued to plan for the
orderly succession of non-executive directors to the Boards,
ensuring that there is progressive refreshing of the Boards
whilst maintaining the right balance of skills, experience,
independence and knowledge.
Following the announcement that mark armour, Chief
Financial officer, would be retiring at the end of 2012, the
Boards have put in place a process for the recruitment of
a successor.
an external independent evaluation of the performance of the
Boards, their committees and directors was undertaken.
a talent review of key executive positions was conducted
during 2011.
the audit Committees conducted a formal review during
2011 of the performance of the external auditors and the
effectiveness of the external audit process and reviewed
the resources, budget and effectiveness of the internal
audit function.
the audit Committees received presentations from divisional
CFos within reed elsevier on the finance organisation, finance
priorities and risk management of their respective divisions,
updates from the reed elsevier group plc group treasurer on
pension arrangements and funding, compliance with treasury
policies and risk management and a presentation from the
head of group taxation on tax policies and related matters.
the following reports describe in more detail how reed elsevier
has applied the principles of good governance in the activities
of the Boards.
anthony Habgood
Chairman
15 February 2012
the following chart outlines areas of significant skills and expertise of the non-executive directors on the Boards.
executive board experience in a large international listed company
Knowledge of corporate governance issues for listed companies
operational experience in reed elsevier’s product markets
operational experience in reed elsevier’s main geographical markets
marketing, customer relations
operational experience with telecommunication/computer technology, electronic publishing
management of human resources, selection and remuneration of executives
Corporate social responsibility
Legal matters
Banking, tax and corporate finance
Financial and organisational audit
Corporate strategy and organisation
percentage of the
non-executive
directors
56
89
33
89
78
56
89
89
78
44
67
89
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
55
Structure and corporate governance
Corporate structure
REED ELSEVIER PLC
REED ELSEVIER NV
REED ELSEVIER GROUP PLC
Publishing and Information Businesses
Elsevier
LexisNexis
Risk
Solutions
LexisNexis
Legal &
Professional
Reed
Exhibitions
Reed
Business
Information
the Boards of both Reed elsevier PLC and Reed elsevier NV have
agreed, other than in special circumstances, to recommend
equivalent gross dividends (including, with respect to the dividend
on Reed elsevier PLC ordinary shares, the associated UK tax
credit) based on the equalisation ratio. A Reed elsevier PLC
ordinary share pays dividends in sterling and is subject to UK tax
law with respect to dividend and capital rights. A Reed elsevier NV
ordinary share pays dividends in euros and is subject to Dutch tax
law with respect to dividend and capital rights. the exchange
rate used for each dividend calculation is the spot euro/sterling
exchange rate, averaged over a period of five consecutive business
days commencing on the tenth business day before the
announcement of the proposed dividend.
ELSEVIER REED FINANCE BV
Financing Activities
Corporate governance
Reed elsevier was created in January 1993, when Reed elsevier
PLC and Reed elsevier NV contributed their respective
businesses to two jointly owned companies, Reed elsevier Group
plc, a UK registered company which owns the publishing and
information businesses, and elsevier Reed Finance BV, a Dutch
registered company which owns the financing activities. Reed
elsevier PLC and Reed elsevier NV have retained their separate
legal and national identities and are publicly held companies.
Reed elsevier PLC’s securities are listed in London and New York,
and Reed elsevier NV’s securities are listed in Amsterdam and
New York. Following the merger of their respective businesses,
Reed elsevier PLC and Reed elsevier NV entered into a Governing
Agreement to regulate their relationship, including the economic
interests of the parties and the composition of their Boards and
those of Reed elsevier Group plc and of elsevier Reed Finance BV.
Equalisation arrangements
Reed elsevier PLC and Reed elsevier NV each hold a 50% interest
in Reed elsevier Group plc. Reed elsevier PLC holds a 39%
interest in elsevier Reed Finance BV, with Reed elsevier NV
holding a 61% interest. Reed elsevier PLC additionally holds a
5.8% indirect equity interest in Reed elsevier NV, reflecting the
arrangements entered into between the two companies at the
time of the merger, which determined the equalisation ratio
whereby one Reed elsevier NV ordinary share is, in broad terms,
intended to confer equivalent economic interests to 1.538 Reed
elsevier PLC ordinary shares. the equalisation ratio is subject to
change to reflect share splits and similar events that affect the
number of outstanding ordinary shares of either Reed elsevier
PLC or Reed elsevier NV.
Under the equalisation arrangements, Reed elsevier PLC
shareholders have a 52.9% economic interest in the Reed elsevier
combined businesses, and Reed elsevier NV shareholders (other
than Reed elsevier PLC) have a 47.1% economic interest in the
Reed elsevier combined businesses. Holders of ordinary shares
in Reed elsevier PLC and Reed elsevier NV enjoy substantially
equivalent dividend and capital rights with respect to their
ordinary shares.
compliance with codes of best practice
the Boards of Reed elsevier PLC and Reed elsevier NV have
implemented standards of corporate governance and disclosure
policies applicable to companies listed on the stock exchanges of
the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and the United States. the
effect of this is that a standard applying to one will, where not in
conflict, also be observed by the other.
the Boards of Reed elsevier PLC and Reed elsevier NV (which
comprises an executive Board and a Supervisory Board, together
the Combined Board) support the principles and provisions of
corporate governance contained in the UK Corporate Governance
Code issued by the Financial Reporting Council in May 2010 (the
UK Code) and those contained in the Dutch Corporate Governance
Code issued in December 2008 (the Dutch Code). the principles
and provisions set out in the UK Code and the Dutch Code have
applied throughout the financial year ended 31 December 2011.
Reed elsevier PLC, which has its primary listing on the London
Stock exchange, has complied throughout the year with the UK
Code. Reed elsevier NV, which has its primary listing on the
euronext Amsterdam Stock exchange, has complied throughout
the year with the UK Code, and subject to limited exceptions as
explained in the Reed elsevier NV Report of the Supervisory Board
and the executive Board on pages 162 to 165, has applied the best
practice provisions of the Dutch Code. the ways in which Reed
elsevier PLC and Reed elsevier NV have applied the main
principles of the UK Code are described below. For further
information on the application of the Dutch Code by Reed elsevier
NV, see the Corporate Governance Statement of Reed elsevier NV
published on the Reed elsevier website, www.reedelsevier.com.
Business model
As required by C.1.2 of the UK Code, pages 4 to 28 describe the
business and the progress made in 2011 against Reed elsevier’s
long term business priorities, aimed to deliver better outcomes
for our customers and create value for Reed elsevier and
shareholders.
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
56
govERnancE
StRUCtURe AND CORPORAte GOVeRNANCe
Relations with shareholders
Reed elsevier PLC and Reed elsevier NV participate in regular
dialogue with institutional shareholders. Presentations are made
by the Chairman, Chief executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer following the announcement of the interim and full year
results and these are simultaneously webcast. A conference call
with investors was also held following the third quarter interim
Management Statement. two investor seminars on specific areas
of the business were held in 2011 which were also webcast and
currently for 2012 two investor seminars are planned and these
will also be webcast. the Chief executive Officer, the Chief
Financial Officer and the investor relations team meet institutional
shareholders on a regular basis and the Chairman also makes
himself available to major institutions as appropriate. A trading
update is provided ahead of the Annual General Meetings of the
two companies and towards the end of the financial year through
interim Management Statements. the interim and annual results
announcements and presentations, together with the interim
Management Statements, investor seminar presentations and
other important announcements and corporate governance
documents concerning Reed elsevier, are published on the Reed
elsevier website, www.reedelsevier.com. in accordance with the
provisions of the Dutch Code, Reed elsevier NV has adopted a
bilateral shareholder contact policy, which is also published on
the Reed elsevier website. the Boards of Reed elsevier PLC and
Reed elsevier NV commission periodic reports on the attitudes
and views of the companies’ institutional shareholders and the
results are presented to the respective Boards.
Both Reed elsevier PLC and Reed elsevier NV offer e-voting
facilities in relation to proxy voting at shareholder meetings.
the Annual General Meetings provide an opportunity for the
Boards to communicate with individual shareholders. the
Chairman, the Chief executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer,
the chairmen of the Board Committees, other directors and a
representative of the external auditors are available to answer
questions from shareholders.
Board induction and information
On appointment and as required, directors receive training
appropriate to their level of previous experience. this includes the
provision of a tailored induction programme so as to provide newly
appointed directors with information about the Reed elsevier
businesses and other relevant information to assist them in
performing their duties. Non-executive directors are encouraged
to visit the Reed elsevier businesses to meet management and
senior staff.
All directors have full and timely access to the information
required to discharge their responsibilities fully and efficiently.
they have access to the services of the respective company
secretaries, other members of Reed elsevier’s management and
staff, and external advisors. Directors may take independent
professional advice in the furtherance of their duties, at the
relevant company’s expense.
in addition to scheduled board and board committee meetings held
during the year, directors attend many other meetings and site visits.
Where a director is unable to attend a board or board committee
meeting he or she is provided with all relevant papers and information
relating to that meeting and is able to discuss issues arising with
the respective chairman and other board members.
Board evaluation
in 2011 the Corporate Governance Committee appointed an
external evaluator (Consilium Board Review), who had no other
connection with Reed elsevier, to carry out an independent
evaluation of the Boards’ effectiveness. the external evaluator
used questionnaires completed by all directors, had meetings
with each of the directors and attended a meeting of the Boards.
the Chairman also held interviews with each member of the
Boards to individually discuss board effectiveness and the review
of the Chairman was led by the senior independent director. the
operation and constitution of the Boards and their Committees
were also evaluated and the findings reported to the Boards.
the Committee and the Boards have fully reviewed and discussed
the findings of the independent evaluation of the performance of
the Boards and their Committees and the individual directors. the
senior independent director also led the Committee’s review of the
assessment as it related to the Chairman during which he
absented himself from the meeting. Based on the assessments of
each director and on the board effectiveness review, the
Committee believes that the performance of each director
continues to be effective and that they demonstrate commitment
to their respective roles in Reed elsevier.
the Committee also believes, based on the review, that the Boards
function effectively and collaboratively and with an appropriate
level of engagement with management. in seeking to further its
effectiveness, the Boards will work to ensure they achieve an
appropriate balance of focus among financial, operational and
strategic matters at each board meeting, in line with the
recommendations of the review.
The Boards
the Board of Reed elsevier PLC, the Combined Board of Reed
elsevier NV and the Board of Reed elsevier Group plc are
harmonised. All of the directors of Reed elsevier Group plc are
also directors of Reed elsevier PLC and are a member of either
the executive Board or the Supervisory Board of Reed elsevier NV.
Reed elsevier NV may nominate for appointment to the
Supervisory Board up to two directors who are not appointed
to the Boards of either Reed elsevier PLC or Reed elsevier
Group plc. Currently, one such director has been appointed
to the Supervisory Board. the names, nationality and
biographical details of each director at the date of this report
appear on pages 52 and 53.
there is a schedule of matters reserved to the Boards and
approved delegated authorities to the Chief executive Officer
and other senior executives. there is a clear separation of the
roles of the Chairman and the Chief executive Officer which
is set out in writing.
the Boards of Reed elsevier PLC, Reed elsevier NV, Reed elsevier
Group plc and elsevier Reed Finance BV each comprise a balance
of executive and non-executive directors who bring a wide range
of skills and experience to the deliberations of the Boards. the
Boards review the independence of the non-executive directors
every year, based on the criteria for independence set out in the
UK Code. the UK Code does not consider the Chairman to be
independent due to the unique role the Chairman has in corporate
governance. Notwithstanding this, Anthony Habgood met the
independence criteria contained in the UK Code when he was
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
57
appointed Chairman in 2009. the Boards consider all non-
executive directors (other than the Chairman) to be independent
of management and free from any business or other relationship
which could materially interfere with their ability to exercise
independent judgement.
Notwithstanding that Mark elliott and Sir David Reid will at the
time of the forthcoming Annual General Meeting have served on
the Boards for nine years, they will both stand for re-appointment
to allow for an orderly transition to newly appointed directors. the
Boards have determined that they remain independent in character
and judgement despite having served on the Boards for more than
nine years and there are also no relationships or circumstances
which are likely to affect their independent judgement.
the Boards of Reed elsevier PLC and of Reed elsevier NV have
appointed Sir David Reid to act as senior independent director,
who is available to meet with institutional shareholders and assist
in resolving concerns in cases where alternative channels are
deemed inappropriate. the senior independent director also leads
the annual assessment of the functioning and performance of
the Chairman of Reed elsevier PLC/Chairman of the Supervisory
Board of Reed elsevier NV. A profile, which identifies the skills and
experience of the non-executive directors of Reed elsevier PLC
and the members of the Supervisory Board of Reed elsevier NV,
is available on the Reed elsevier website, www.reedelsevier.com.
Reed elsevier PLC and Reed elsevier NV shareholders maintain
their rights to appoint individuals to the respective Boards in
accordance with the provisions of the Articles of Association of
these companies. Subject to this, no individual may be appointed
to the Boards of Reed elsevier PLC, Reed elsevier NV (either of
the executive Board or the Supervisory Board) or Reed elsevier
Group plc unless recommended by the joint Nominations
Committee. Members of the Committee abstain when their
own re-appointment is being considered.
As a general rule, letters of appointment in respect of
non-executive directors of Reed elsevier PLC and members of the
Supervisory Board of Reed elsevier NV provide that individuals
will serve for an initial term of three years, and are typically
expected to serve two three-year terms, although the Boards may
invite an individual to serve for an additional period of three years.
the respective Articles of Association of Reed elsevier PLC and
Reed elsevier NV provide that all directors should be subject to
retirement at least every three years and are then able to make
themselves available for re-election by shareholders at
subsequent Annual General Meetings. Notwithstanding the
provisions of the said Articles of Association, the Boards comply
with the recommendations contained in the UK Code, and all
directors seek re-election by shareholders annually.
Board changes
Changes during the year in the composition of the Boards of Reed
elsevier PLC, Reed elsevier NV and Reed elsevier Group plc are
noted in the board attendance table below.
Following a recommendation from the Nominations Committee,
Adrian Hennah was appointed a non-executive director of Reed
elsevier PLC and a member of the Reed elsevier NV Supervisory
Board at the respective Annual General Meetings in April 2011,
and was also appointed a non-executive director of Reed elsevier
Group plc. Lord Sharman retired from the Boards at the
conclusion of the Reed elsevier NV and Reed elsevier PLC
Annual General Meetings in April 2011. in accordance with the
recommendation in the UK Code, all directors will retire from the
Boards at the respective Annual General Meetings and, being
eligible, they will offer themselves for re-election. taking into
account the assessment by the Corporate Governance Committee
of the qualifications, performance and effectiveness of each
individual director seeking re-election, the Boards have accepted
a recommendation from the Nominations Committee that each
director be proposed for re-election at the Annual General
Meeting of the respective company.
BoaRd attEndancE
Reed elsevier PLC
Reed elsevier NV
Reed elsevier Group plc
Members
Mark Armour
Mark elliott
erik engstrom
Anthony Habgood
Adrian Hennah
Lisa Hook
Marike van Lier Lels
Robert Polet
Sir David Reid
Lord Sharman
Ben van der Veer
Date of
appointment
(cessation)
during the year
Number of
meetings
held whilst
a director
Number of
meetings
attended
Number of
meetings
held whilst
a director
Number of
meetings
attended
Number of
meetings
held whilst
a director
Number of
meetings
attended
6
6
6
6
4
6
n/a
6
6
2
6
6
6
6
6
4
6
n/a
6
5
1
6
6
6
6
6
4
6
6
6
6
2
6
6
6
6
6
4
6
6
6
5
1
6
7
7
7
7
5
7
n/a
7
7
2
7
7
7
7
7
5
6
n/a
7
6
1
7
April 2011
(April 2011)
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
58
govERnancE
StRUCtURe AND CORPORAte GOVeRNANCe
Elsevier Reed Finance Bv has a two-tier board structure comprising a Supervisory Board and a Management Board. the Supervisory
Board consists of Rudolf van den Brink (Chairman), Mark Armour, Ben van der Veer and Marike van Lier Lels, with the Management
Board consisting of Jacques Billy, Gerben de Jong and Jans van der Woude. Appointments to the Supervisory Board and the
Management Board are made by elsevier Reed Finance BV’s shareholders, in accordance with the company’s Articles of Association.
ELSEvIER REEd FInancE Bv
Members
Mark Armour
Jacques Billy
Rudolf van den Brink
Gerben de Jong
Marike van Lier Lels
Ben van der Veer
Jans van der Woude
Board committees
Number of
meetings
held whilst
a director
Number of
meetings
attended
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
in accordance with the principles of good corporate governance, the following committees have been established by the respective
Boards. All of the committees have written terms of reference, which are published on the Reed elsevier website,
www.reedelsevier.com. Membership of each committee during the year is set out below.
audit committees: Reed elsevier PLC, Reed elsevier NV and Reed elsevier Group plc have established Audit Committees. the
Committees comprise only non-executive directors. the Committees are chaired by Ben van der Veer. A report of the Audit Committees,
setting out their role and main activities during the year, appears on pages 80 to 82.
audIt coMMIttEES
Members
Adrian Hennah
Lisa Hook
Sir David Reid
Lord Sharman
Ben van der Veer
Date of
appointment
(cessation)
during the year
April 2011
(April 2011)
Number of
meetings
held whilst a
Committee
member
Number of
meetings
attended
3
5
5
2
5
2
4
3
2
5
the functions of an audit committee in respect of the financing activities are carried out by the Supervisory Board of elsevier Reed
Finance BV.
Remuneration committee: Reed elsevier Group plc has established a Remuneration Committee, which is responsible for considering
the remuneration for the executive directors and the Chairman. the Committee comprises only non-executive directors, and is chaired
by Mark elliott. A Directors’ Remuneration Report, which has been approved by the Boards of Reed elsevier Group plc, Reed elsevier
PLC and Reed elsevier NV, appears on pages 63 to 79. this report also serves as disclosure of the directors’ remuneration policy, and the
remuneration and interests of the directors in the shares of the two parent companies, Reed elsevier PLC and Reed elsevier NV.
REMunERatIon coMMIttEE
Members
Mark elliott
Anthony Habgood
Robert Polet
Sir David Reid
Number of
meetings
held whilst a
Committee
member
Number of
meetings
attended
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
3
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
59
nominations committee: Reed elsevier PLC and Reed elsevier NV have established a joint Nominations Committee. the Committee
comprises only non-executive directors, and is chaired by Anthony Habgood. A report of the Nominations Committee, setting out its role
and main activities during the year, appears on page 62.
noMInatIonS coMMIttEE
Members
Mark elliott
Anthony Habgood
Lisa Hook
Sir David Reid
Lord Sharman
Ben van der Veer
Date of
appointment
(cessation)
during the year
Number of
meetings
held whilst a
Committee
member
Number of
meetings
attended
April 2011
(April 2011)
January 2011
5
5
4
5
2
5
5
5
3
3
1
5
corporate governance committee: Reed elsevier PLC and Reed elsevier NV have established a joint Corporate Governance
Committee, which is responsible for reviewing ongoing developments and best practice in corporate governance. the Committee is also
responsible for assessing the performance of the directors and recommending the structure and operation of the various committees
of the Boards and the qualifications and criteria for membership of each committee, including the independence of members of the
Boards. the Committee comprises only non-executive directors, and is chaired by Anthony Habgood.
coRPoRatE govERnancE coMMIttEE
Members
Mark elliott
Anthony Habgood
Adrian Hennah
Lisa Hook
Marike van Lier Lels
Robert Polet
Sir David Reid
Lord Sharman
Ben van der Veer
Internal control
Parent companies
the Boards of Reed elsevier PLC and Reed elsevier NV exercise
independent supervisory roles over the activities and systems of
internal control of Reed elsevier Group plc and elsevier Reed
Finance BV. the Boards of Reed elsevier PLC and Reed elsevier NV
have each adopted a schedule of matters which are required to be
brought to them for decision. in relation to Reed elsevier Group plc
and elsevier Reed Finance BV, the Boards of Reed elsevier PLC and
Reed elsevier NV approve the strategy and the annual budgets, and
receive regular reports on the operations, including the treasury
and risk management activities of the two companies. Major
transactions proposed by the Boards of Reed elsevier Group plc or
elsevier Reed Finance BV require the approval of the Boards of both
Reed elsevier PLC and Reed elsevier NV.
the Reed elsevier PLC and Reed elsevier NV Audit Committees
meet on a regular basis to review the systems of internal control
and risk management of Reed elsevier Group plc and elsevier
Reed Finance BV.
Date of
appointment
(cessation)
during the year
Number of
meetings
held whilst a
Committee
member
Number of
meetings
attended
April 2011
(April 2011)
4
4
3
4
4
4
4
1
4
4
4
3
4
4
4
4
1
4
operating companies
the Board of Reed elsevier Group plc is responsible for the system
of internal control of the Reed elsevier publishing and information
businesses, while the Boards of elsevier Reed Finance BV are
responsible for the system of internal control in respect of the
finance group activities. the Boards of Reed elsevier Group plc
and elsevier Reed Finance BV are also responsible for reviewing
the effectiveness of their systems of internal control.
the Boards of Reed elsevier Group plc and elsevier Reed Finance
BV have each implemented an ongoing process for identifying,
evaluating, monitoring and managing the more significant risks
faced by their respective businesses. these processes have been
in place throughout the year ended 31 December 2011 and up to
the date of the approvals of the Annual Reports and Financial
Statements 2011.
Reed Elsevier group plc
Reed elsevier Group plc has an established framework of
procedures and internal controls, with which the management
of each business is required to comply. Group businesses are
required to maintain systems of internal control which are
appropriate to the nature and scale of their activities and address
all significant operational and financial risks that they face. the
Board of Reed elsevier Group plc has adopted a schedule of
matters that are required to be brought to it for decision.
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
60
govERnancE
StRUCtURe AND CORPORAte GOVeRNANCe
Reed elsevier Group plc has a Code of ethics and Business
Conduct that provides a guide for achieving its business goals and
requires officers and employees to behave in an open, honest,
ethical and principled manner. the Code also outlines confidential
procedures enabling employees to report any concerns about
compliance, or about Reed elsevier’s financial reporting
practice. the Code is published on the Reed elsevier website,
www.reedelsevier.com.
each division has identified and evaluated its major risks, the
controls in place to manage those risks and the levels of residual
risk accepted. Risk management and control procedures are
embedded into the operations of the business and include the
monitoring of progress in areas for improvement that come to
management and board attention. the major risks identified
include business continuity, protection of it systems and data,
challenges to intellectual property rights, management of strategic
and operational change, evaluation and integration of acquisitions,
and recruitment and retention of personnel. Further detail on the
principal risks facing Reed elsevier is set out on pages 48 to 50.
the major strategic risks facing the Reed elsevier Group plc
businesses are considered by the Board. Reed elsevier’s Chief
Risk Officer is responsible for providing regular reports to the
Board and Audit Committee. Working closely with business
management and with the central functions, the role of the Chief
Risk Officer is to ensure that Reed elsevier is managing its
business risks effectively and in a coordinated manner across
the business with clarity on the respective responsibilities and
interdependencies. Litigation and other legal regulatory matters
are managed by legal directors in europe and the United States.
the Reed elsevier Group plc Audit Committee receives regular
reports on the identification and management of material risks
and reviews these reports. the Audit Committee also receives
regular reports from both internal and external auditors on
internal control and risk management matters. in addition, each
division is required, at the end of the financial year, to review the
effectiveness of internal controls and risk management and
report its findings on a detailed basis to the management of Reed
elsevier Group plc. these reports are summarised and, as part
of the annual review of effectiveness, submitted to the Audit
Committee of Reed elsevier Group plc. the Chairman of the
Audit Committee reports to the Board on any significant internal
control matters arising.
Elsevier Reed Finance Bv
elsevier Reed Finance BV has established policy guidelines,
which are applied to all elsevier Reed Finance BV companies.
the respective Boards of elsevier Reed Finance BV have adopted
schedules of matters that are required to be brought to them for
decision. Procedures are in place for monitoring the activities of
the finance group, including a comprehensive treasury reporting
system. the major risks affecting the finance group have been
identified and evaluated and are subject to regular review. the
controls in place to manage these risks and the level of residual
risk accepted are monitored by the Boards.
annual review
As part of the year end procedures, the Audit Committees and
Boards of Reed elsevier PLC, Reed elsevier NV, Reed elsevier
Group plc and elsevier Reed Finance BV review the effectiveness
of the systems of internal control and risk management during the
last financial year. the objective of these systems is to manage,
rather than eliminate, the risk of failure to achieve business
objectives. Accordingly, they can only provide reasonable, but not
absolute, assurance against material misstatement or loss. the
Boards have confirmed, subject to the above, that as regards
financial reporting risks, the respective risk management and
control systems provide reasonable assurance against material
inaccuracies or loss and have functioned properly during the year.
Responsibilities in respect of the
financial statements
the directors of Reed elsevier PLC, Reed elsevier NV, Reed elsevier
Group plc and elsevier Reed Finance BV are required to prepare
financial statements as at the end of each financial period, in
accordance with applicable law and regulations, which give a true
and fair view of the state of affairs, and of the profit or loss, of the
respective companies and their subsidiaries, joint ventures and
associates. they are responsible for maintaining proper accounting
records, for safeguarding assets, and for taking reasonable steps to
prevent and detect fraud and other irregularities. the directors are
also responsible for selecting suitable accounting policies and
applying them on a consistent basis, making judgements and
estimates that are prudent and reasonable.
Applicable accounting standards have been followed and the
Reed elsevier combined financial statements, which are the
responsibility of the directors of Reed elsevier PLC and Reed
elsevier NV, are prepared using accounting policies which comply
with international Financial Reporting Standards.
Going concern
the directors of Reed elsevier PLC and Reed elsevier NV, having
made appropriate enquiries, consider that adequate resources
exist for the combined businesses to continue in operational
existence for the foreseeable future and that, therefore, it is
appropriate to adopt the going concern basis in preparing the 2011
financial statements. in reaching this conclusion, the directors of
Reed elsevier PLC and Reed elsevier NV have had due regard to
the combined businesses’ financial position as at 31 December
2011, the strong free cash flow of the combined businesses, Reed
elsevier’s ability to access capital markets and the principal risks
facing Reed elsevier.
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
61
A commentary on the Reed elsevier combined businesses’
cash flows, financial position and liquidity for the year ended
31 December 2011 is set out in the Chief Financial Officer’s Report
on pages 42 to 44. this shows that after taking account of available
cash resources and committed bank facilities that back up short
term borrowings, none of Reed elsevier’s borrowings fall due
within the next two years. Reed elsevier’s policies on liquidity,
capital management and management of risks relating to interest
rate, foreign exchange and credit exposures are set out on pages
46 and 47. Further information on liquidity of the combined
businesses can be found in note 18 of the combined financial
statements. the principal risks facing Reed elsevier are set out
on pages 48 to 50.
US certificates
As required by Section 302 of the US Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 and
by related rules issued by the US Securities and exchange
Commission, the Chief executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of Reed elsevier PLC and of Reed elsevier NV certify in the
respective Annual Reports 2011 on Form 20-F to be filed with the
Commission that they are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures and that they have:
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
that material information relating to Reed elsevier is made
known to them;
evaluated the effectiveness of Reed elsevier’s disclosure
controls and procedures;
based on their evaluation, disclosed to the Audit Committees
and the external auditors all significant deficiencies in the
design or operation of disclosure controls and procedures and
any frauds, whether or not material, that involve management
or other employees who have a significant role in Reed
elsevier’s internal controls; and
presented in the Reed elsevier Annual Report 2011 on Form
20-F their conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures.
A Disclosure Committee, comprising the company secretaries of
Reed elsevier PLC and Reed elsevier NV and other senior Reed
elsevier managers, provides assurance to the Chief executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer regarding their Section 302
certifications.
Section 404 of the US Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 requires the Chief
executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Reed elsevier PLC
and of Reed elsevier NV to certify in the respective Annual Reports
2011 on Form 20-F that they are responsible for maintaining
adequate internal control structures and procedures for financial
reporting and to conduct an assessment of their effectiveness.
the conclusions of the assessment of internal control structures
and financial reporting procedures, which are unqualified, are
presented in the Reed elsevier Annual Report 2011 on Form 20-F.
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
62
govERnancE
RePORt OF tHe NOMiNAtiONS COMMittee
Report of the Nominations Committee
composition of the Boards
During the year the main focus of the Committee has been
succession planning in relation to the appointment of non-
executive directors to refresh the Boards arising from the
impending retirement of long serving non-executive directors.
Also, following the announcement in October 2011 that Mark
Armour, the Chief Financial Officer, had decided to retire at the
end of 2012, the Committee has begun the process to identify
his successor.
there is a formal, rigorous and transparent procedure
for the recruitment of candidates to the Boards, and such
recommendations are made solely on the basis of a candidate’s
merit, against objective criteria. in this recruitment process,
the Committee seeks to ensure that the Boards and where
appropriate, their committees, comprise an appropriate balance
of skills, experience, independence and knowledge of Reed
elsevier’s businesses.
in recommending appointments to the Boards, the Committee
considers the knowledge, experience and background of individual
directors and has regard to the benefits of diversity, including
gender. the Committee has reviewed the recommendations of the
Davies Review “Women on boards” issued in February 2011, which
sets an aspirational target of 25% female representation on FtSe
100 boards by 2015. By 2013 we anticipate the Reed elsevier NV
Combined Board will be comprised of 30% women and the Reed
elsevier PLC Board will be comprised of 22% women. in addition,
a diversity and inclusion strategy was adopted in 2010 with support
of senior leadership throughout Reed elsevier, with each business
unit asked to incorporate diversity and inclusion into its strategic
plans. Further details are provided in the Corporate Responsibility
report on pages 29 to 38.
this report has been prepared by the joint Nominations
Committee of Reed elsevier PLC and Reed elsevier NV and has
been approved by the respective Boards.
Role of the committee
the principal role of the Committee is to provide assistance to the
Boards of Reed elsevier PLC, Reed elsevier NV and Reed elsevier
Group plc by identifying individuals qualified to become directors
and recommending to the Boards the appointment of such
individuals.
the main responsibilities of the Committee are set out in
written terms of reference (available at www.reedelsevier.com)
and include:
(i)
(ii)
to develop and agree the desired profile for potential
candidates for board membership;
in consultation with external search consultants, agree the
specification for the recruitment of new directors which
provides a formal and transparent procedure for the
selection and appointment of new directors to the Boards;
(iii) to recommend to the Boards the appointment of candidates
subject, where appropriate, to the approval of shareholders
of Reed elsevier PLC and Reed elsevier NV;
(iv) to recommend to the Boards directors to serve on Board
Committees, having regard to the criteria for service on each
committee as set out in the terms of reference for such
committees, and to recommend members to serve as the
Chair of those committees;
(v)
in consultation with the Chairman of the Remuneration
Committee and appropriate external consultants, to develop
proposals for the remuneration or fees for new directors;
(vi) to make recommendations to the Boards in relation to the
possible re-appointment of directors at the Annual General
Meetings of Reed elsevier PLC and Reed elsevier NV.
committee membership
the Committee comprises only non-executive directors, and is
chaired by Anthony Habgood. the other members are Mark elliott,
Lisa Hook (appointed to the Committee in April 2011), Sir David
Reid and Ben van der Veer. Lord Sharman ceased to be a member
of the Committee upon his retirement from the Boards in April
2011. the Committee met five times during the year.
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
63
Directors’ remuneration report
Remuneration Committee
64 Constitution and terms of reference
Executive directors
64 Remuneration philosophy and policy
66 The total remuneration package
73 Service contracts
Non-executive directors
74 Policy on non-executive directors’ fees
Total Shareholder Return graphs
75 Total Shareholder Return graphs
Remuneration and share tables
75 Directors’ emoluments and fees
76 Directors’ shareholdings in Reed Elsevier
77 Share-based awards in Reed Elsevier
The Directors’ Remuneration Report (the Report) describes
how Reed Elsevier applies the principles of good governance
relating to directors’ remuneration. This Report has been
prepared by the Remuneration Committee of Reed Elsevier
Group plc (the Committee) in accordance with regulations
made under the Companies Act 2006 and the Dutch Corporate
Governance Code (the Dutch Code).
The Report was approved by the Boards of Reed Elsevier Group
plc, Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV and will be
submitted to shareholders for an advisory vote at the Annual
General Meeting of Reed Elsevier PLC.
The audited parts of the Report
In compliance with the Large and Medium-sized Companies
and Groups (Accounts and Reports) Regulations 2008, and
under Title 9, Book 2 of the Civil Code in the Netherlands, the
following elements of this Report have been audited: the table
entitled ‘Transfer values of accrued pension benefits’ on page
73; the tables showing ‘Aggregate emoluments’ and ‘Individual
fees of non-executive directors’ on pages 75 and 76; the tables
on ‘Individual emoluments of executive directors’ and
‘Directors’ shareholdings in Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed
Elsevier NV’ on page 76; and the section ‘Share-based awards
in Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV’ on pages 77 and 78.
Introduction from Remuneration
Committee Chairman
During 2011, awards granted under the 2008-10 cycle of the
Executive Share Option Scheme (ESOS) and the Long-Term
Incentive Plan (LTIP) lapsed for executive directors as a result
of performance conditions not being met. ESOS and LTIP awards
granted under the 2009-11 cycle of these plans also lapsed
for executive directors prior to the date of this Report for the
same reasons.
During the year, the executive directors were eligible to participate
in the Bonus Investment Plan (BIP) and took full advantage of the
investment opportunity available to them. In addition, grants of
market value options with a face value of 150% of base salary
(half of the permitted maximum) were made during 2011 under
ESOS to the executive directors.
No new multi-year incentives were introduced for executive
directors in 2011. The executive directors were not eligible for
further awards under the Reed Elsevier Growth Plan (REGP)
and did not receive any other multi-year incentive awards.
The Committee decided to award the executive directors a salary
increase of 2.5% each effective 1 January 2012. This level of
increase is in line with 2012 increases applicable to the wider
employee population and other senior executives.
Annual bonuses payable for 2011 to the executive directors were
close to target reflecting good progress in the business during
the year.
We previously indicated to shareholders that we intend to come
back in due course with proposals for the implementation of a
more regular, annual, LTIP for executive directors from 2013
onwards in relation to which initial discussions and work
commenced in the second part of 2011. This work will continue in
2012 with a view to drawing up proposals for discussion with
shareholders ahead of the 2013 AGMs.
During the year, Reed Elsevier announced that Mark Armour will
retire on 31 December 2012. The terms and conditions which will
apply in relation to the retirement are summarised on page 74 of
this Report.
Our approach to preparing this Report has been to meet the
highest standards of disclosure, balancing in a thoughtful and
responsible manner the UK legislative requirements with best
practice guidelines on disclosure in the Netherlands. In preparing
this Report, the Committee had regard to the approach adopted by
other large global businesses subject to disclosure requirements
in more than one jurisdiction. As in prior years, our aim has been to
produce a clear, informative and understandable report.
Mark Elliott
Chairman, Remuneration Committee
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
64
governance
directors’ remuneration report
Remuneration Committee
constitution
throughout 2011, the committee consisted of independent
non-executive directors, as defined by the uK corporate
Governance code and the dutch code, and the chairman of reed
elsevier Group plc. details of committee members and meeting
attendance are contained in the section on ‘structure and
corporate governance’ on page 58 of the annual reports. the
company secretary also attends the meetings in his capacity as
secretary to the committee. at the invitation of the committee
chairman, the ceo of reed elsevier Group plc attends appropriate
parts of the meetings. the ceo of reed elsevier Group plc is not in
attendance during discussions pertaining to his remuneration.
the Global Human resources director provided material advice
to the committee during the year.
advisers
towers Watson acted as external advisers to the committee
throughout 2011 and also provided market data and data analysis.
towers Watson also provided actuarial and other human
resources consultancy services directly to some reed elsevier
companies.
the individual consultants involved in advising the committee do
not provide advice to the executive directors or act on their behalf.
Terms of reference
the committee reviewed its terms of reference prior to the date of
this report in the context of the uK corporate Governance code,
applicable legislation and current practice and guidance which
resulted in a number of minor amendments. the revised terms of
reference describe the committee’s responsibilities as follows:
Executive directors
to establish the remuneration policy for the executive directors
and determine the remuneration in all its forms (including
pensions and share plan participation), the terms of the service
contracts and all other terms and conditions of employment
of the executive directors of reed elsevier Group plc and
reed elsevier pLc and on the advice of the chairman the
remuneration terms of the ceo (with respect to reed elsevier
nV, the committee recommends to the supervisory Board the
remuneration policy and the remuneration in all its forms for
the ceo and other executive directors); and
approve any compensation or termination payments made
to executive directors of reed elsevier Group plc and reed
elsevier pLc.
Senior management
on the advice of the chief executive officer, to approve the
remuneration policy of other senior leaders and of the
company secretary; and
to monitor the level and structure of remuneration for this
group of executives.
Reed Elsevier Chairman
on the advice of the senior independent director, to determine
the remuneration of the reed elsevier chairman (with
respect to reed elsevier nV, to recommend, on advice of
the senior independent director, to the combined Board the
chairman’s remuneration in respect of his chairmanship of
reed elsevier nV).
General
to review the ongoing appropriateness and relevance of the
remuneration policy, in particular the performance-related
elements and their compatibility with risk policies and
systems;
to review and recommend amendments to the rules of all
share-based incentive plans including the formulation of
suitable performance conditions for share based awards and
options, and where necessary, to submit them for approval
by shareholders;
to maintain an open and ongoing dialogue with institutional
investors on major remuneration policy issues; and
to discharge its duties with due regard to any published
corporate governance guidelines, codes or recommendations
regarding the remuneration of directors of listed companies
and formation and operation of share schemes which the
committee considers relevant or appropriate including, but
not limited to, the uK and dutch corporate Governance codes.
a copy of the terms of reference of the committee can be found on
the reed elsevier website, www.reedelsevier.com.
Executive directors
remuneration philosophy and policy
the context for reed elsevier’s remuneration policy and practices
is set by the needs of a global business with business areas that
operate internationally by line of business. Furthermore, reed
elsevier pLc and reed elsevier nV’s respective stock market
listings in London and amsterdam combined with the majority of
its employees being based in the us provides a particular set of
challenges in the design and operation of remuneration policy.
our remuneration philosophy
reed elsevier’s guiding remuneration philosophy for senior
executives is based on the following precepts:
performance-related compensation with demanding
performance standards.
creation of shareholder value.
competitive remuneration opportunity to attract and retain the
best executive talent from anywhere in the world.
a balanced mix of remuneration between fixed and variable
elements, and annual and longer term performance.
aligning the interests of executive directors with shareholders
and other stakeholders.
our remuneration policy
in line with this guiding philosophy our remuneration policy is
described below.
reed elsevier aims to provide a total remuneration package
that is able to attract and retain the best executive talent from
anywhere in the world, at an appropriate level of cost.
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
65
In reaching decisions on executive remuneration, the
Committee takes into account the remuneration arrangements
and levels of increase applicable to senior management and
Reed Elsevier employees generally.
The Committee considers the social, governance, and
environmental implications of its decisions, particularly when
setting and assessing performance objectives and targets,
and seeks to ensure that incentives are consistent with the
appropriate management of risk.
50%
Total targeted remuneration of senior executives will be
competitive with that of executives in similar positions in
comparable companies, which includes global sector peers
and companies of similar scale and international complexity.
Competitiveness is assessed in terms of total remuneration
(i.e. salary, annual and multi-year incentives and benefits).
The intention is to provide total remuneration that reflects
sustained individual and business performance; i.e. median
performance will be rewarded by total remuneration that is
positioned around the median of relevant market data and
upper quartile performance by upper quartile total
remuneration.
The Committee will consider all available discretion to claw
back any payouts made on the basis of materially misstated
data. With effect from 2009, the rules of all incentive plans were
amended to provide for specific provisions in this regard.
The Committee considers it important to encourage personal
investment and ongoing holding of Reed Elsevier PLC and/or
Reed Elsevier NV securities among the senior executive
population. Executive directors and other senior executives
are subject to minimum shareholding requirements.
How the performance measures in the incentives link to our
business strategy
Our annual incentive plan is focused on operational excellence as
measured by the financial measures of revenue, profit and cash
generation. In addition, a significant portion of the annual bonus
is dependent upon the achievement of annual key performance
objectives (KPOs) that create a platform for sustainable future
performance. These KPOs align with Reed Elsevier’s strategic
plans and range from the delivery of specific projects and the
achievement of customer metrics or efficiency targets to
corporate and social responsibility objectives.
The Committee believes that one of the main drivers of long
term shareholder value is sustained growth in profitability,
underpinned by appropriate capital discipline. Therefore growth
in earnings per share and targeted return on invested capital are
both utilised in our multi-year incentives.
The balance between fixed and performance-related pay
We aim to provide each executive director with an annual total
remuneration package comprising fixed and variable pay with the
majority of an executive director’s total remuneration package
linked to performance. At target performance, incentive pay
makes up approximately 70% of the total remuneration package
as shown in the pie chart. The core components of the total
remuneration package are described in detail in the remainder
of this Report.
20%
Fixed pay elements 30%
Salary
Pensions and
other benefits
10%
Variable pay elements 70%
Annual incentive
Multi-year incentives
20%
To illustrate how our levels of compensation are driven by
business performance we have produced the chart below (scale
in percent of base salary). This shows the way in which annual
remuneration payable to an executive director would vary under
different performance scenarios. For the purposes of this
illustration assumptions have been made in relation to vesting/
payout levels at the different levels of performance.
700%
600%
500%
400%
300%
200%
100%
0%
Minimum
Threshold
Target
Maximum
Salary
Annual incentive
Multi-year incentives
Our approach to market positioning and benchmarking
The market competitiveness of total remuneration (i.e. salary,
annual and multi-year incentives and benefits) is assessed against
a range of relevant comparator groups as follows:
Global peers operating in businesses similar to those
of Reed Elsevier (including Thomson Reuters, WPP, Pearson,
John Wiley, Wolters Kluwer, Dun & Bradstreet, Experian,
McGraw-Hill, UBM, DMGT, Informa, Lagardère and FICO).
Companies listed on the London Stock Exchange (cross-
industry but excluding those in the financial services sector) of
a similar size (measured by aggregate market capitalisation)
and international scope.
Companies listed on the New York Stock Exchange
(cross-industry but excluding those in the financial services
sector) of a similar size (measured by aggregate market
capitalisation) and international scope.
Companies listed on the Amsterdam Stock Exchange,
cross-industry and of a similar size (measured by aggregate
market capitalisation) and international scope.
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
66
govERNaNCE
DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION REPORT
The composition of the respective comparator groups is subject
to minor changes year on year reflecting changes in the size,
international scope and listing status of specific companies during
the year.
The competitiveness of our remuneration packages is assessed
by the Committee as part of the annual review cycle for pay and
performance, in line with the process set out below.
First, the overall competitiveness of the total remuneration
packages is assessed both against the market and taking
account of remuneration levels within Reed Elsevier more
widely. The appropriate positioning of an individual’s total
remuneration against the market is determined based on
the Committee’s judgement of individual performance
and potential.
The Committee then considers market data and benchmarks
for the different elements of the package including salary,
total annual cash and total remuneration. While relevant
benchmark information is a meaningful input to the process,
they inform rather than drive the outcome of the review.
If it is determined that a total remuneration competitive gap
exists, the Committee believes that this should be addressed
via a review of performance-linked compensation elements
in the first instance.
Benefits, including medical and retirement benefits, are
positioned to reflect local country practice.
The total remuneration package
Each element of the remuneration package for executive directors is designed to achieve specific objectives, as described in this section.
In aggregate, they create a unified and balanced reward mix and competitive employment proposition. The value of the reward package
is only maximised through the integrated delivery of annual and longer term performance. Reward for the delivery of business results
is connected with reward for value flowing to shareholders. Through the use of a range of performance metrics such as earnings per
share, return on invested capital, profit after tax, revenue, cash flow conversion rate and total shareholder return and the assessment
of performance over multiple time-horizons, the incentive arrangements are structured in such a way that reward cannot be maximised
through inappropriate short term risk-taking.
The table below summarises the component parts of the remuneration package provided to the executive directors during 2011. This
includes the bonuses earned for performance during 2011, payouts received from and awards granted under the multi-year incentives
during the year.
Component
Base salary (page 67)
Retirement benefits
(page 72)
other benefits
annual incentive (page 67)
(earned for 2011 and payable
in March 2012)
Multi-year
incentives granted
(page 68)
Multi-year
incentives vested
(2008–10 cycle)
ESOS
BIP
LTIP
ESOS
Shareholding requirement
(page 72)
Erik Engstrom
£1,025,000
Mark armour
£628,776
UK defined benefit plan
UK defined benefit plan
Includes company car or
cash allowance and private
medical benefit
Includes company car or
cash allowance and private
medical benefit
£1,021,925
£611,799
Market value options over
139,146 PLC and 92,953 NV
ordinary shares
61,176 NV ADRs
Lapsed
Lapsed
Market value options over
85,358 PLC and 57,021 NV
ordinary shares
56,876 PLC and 37,687 NV
ordinary shares
Lapsed
Lapsed
300% of salary
200% of salary
Policy in relation to the individual remuneration elements is described in greater detail in the remainder of this section.
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
67
The KPOs are individual to each executive director. Each executive
director is set up to six KPOs to reflect critical business priorities
for which he is accountable. The KPO component for the executive
directors and other senior executives will contain at least one KPO
relating to the achievement of specific sustainability objectives
and targets contained within Reed Elsevier’s corporate
responsibility agenda.
Against each objective, measurable milestone targets are set
for the year. All financial targets and KPOs are approved by the
Committee and are subject to formal assessment at the end of
each year. The Chairman of Reed Elsevier Group plc presents his
assessment of performance against KPOs for the CEO of Reed
Elsevier Group plc to the Committee while the CEO of Reed Elsevier
Group plc presents his assessment of KPO performance for the
CFO of Reed Elsevier Group plc. The Committee then discusses
and agrees the final KPO score for each executive director.
aIP payments for 2011
In assessing the level of bonus payments for 2011, the Committee
noted the following performances:
Reed Elsevier
% change over 2010 at constant exchange rates
Underlying
revenue growth
+2%
Total adjusted
PAT
+6%
Reed Elsevier continued its positive momentum in 2011. All five
business areas contributed to underlying revenue growth,
excluding biennial cycling, with underlying operating profits
showing good growth. Underlying revenues, which exclude the
effects of currency translations and acquisitions and disposals,
were up 2%, or 3% excluding the cycling effect of biennial
exhibitions, reflecting a consistent performance from our
subscription and online data businesses. Adjusted operating
profits were up 4% at constant currencies. Total costs, including
acquisitions and disposals, fell by 2% at constant exchange rates
and adjusted operating margins at 27.1% were 1.4 percentage
points higher than last year. Adjusted operating cash flow was flat
compared with the prior year or down 1% at constant currencies.
The lower level of cash flow conversion reflects among other
things higher capital expenditure through increased investment
in new products and related infrastructure in 2011. Returns on
invested capital increased to 11.2%, 0.6 percentage points higher
than in 2010, reflecting improvements in trading performance,
strong cash flow and capital efficiency.
Overall, the sum of the individual scores achieved against the four
AIP components was close to target for both executive directors,
resulting in the following bonuses for 2011:
2011 annual bonus
(to be paid in March 2012)
% of 2011 base
salary earnings
Erik Engstrom
Mark Armour
£1,021,925
£611,799
99.7%
97.3%
Base salary
Salary reflects the role and the sustained value of the executive
in terms of skills, experience and contribution in the context of
the relevant market.
Salaries for executive directors are reviewed annually in the
context of the competitiveness of total remuneration and Reed
Elsevier’s guidelines for wages and salaries agreed for the whole
of Reed Elsevier for the forthcoming financial year. Any increases
typically take effect on 1 January.
The Committee decided to award a salary increase of 2.5% to each
executive director which increased base salaries with effect from
1 January 2012 to £1,050,625 for Erik Engstrom and £644,495 for
Mark Armour. In determining the salary recommendation for
executive directors, the Committee considered, among other
inputs, 2012 salary guidance for Reed Elsevier’s most significant
employee locations globally. The salary recommendations for the
executive directors are within the guidelines agreed for those
employees in respect of 2012 increases.
In respect of salaries for the broader employee population, Reed
Elsevier uses the same factors to determine the levels of increase
across all employee populations globally: i.e. relevant pay market,
skills, experience and contribution. Reed Elsevier operates across
many diverse countries in terms of their remuneration structures
and practices. Any increases awarded to different employee
groups in different geographies reflect this diversity and range of
practices. An increase of approximately 2.5% on average will be
awarded across the senior management population globally for
2012. This level of increase is in line with increases provided to the
wider employee population.
annual incentive
The Annual Incentive Plan (AIP) provides focus on the delivery of
stretching annual financial targets and the achievement of annual
objectives and milestones that create a platform for sustainable
future performance.
For 2012, executive directors have a target bonus opportunity of
100% of salary that is weighted as follows across four elements
(unchanged from 2011):
Measure
Revenue
Adjusted Profit After Tax
Cash Flow Conversion Rate
Key Performance Objectives (KPOs)
Weighting
30%
30%
10%
30%
The target bonus opportunity for the financial measures is payable
for the achievement of highly stretching financial targets. The four
elements are measured separately, such that there could be a
payout on one element and not on others.
For 2012, the minimum threshold on the financial elements of the
AIP at which a bonus starts to accrue is 94% of target achievement
and the maximum bonus is 150% of target (unchanged from 2011),
although the Committee decided to slightly adjust the payout slope
for financials between threshold and maximum to align executive
directors with other executives and employees. This means that
part of the bonus will accrue for achieving threshold whilst a
higher level of out-performance will be required to achieve the
maximum bonus.
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
68
govERNaNCE
DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION REPORT
Multi-year incentives
The multi-year incentives comprise the REGP, BIP, ESOS and LTIP.
The purpose of the multi-year incentives is to provide focus on
the delivery of the medium to longer term strategy and holding
executives accountable for the delivery of that strategy while
driving value creation through sustained financial performance,
capital discipline and the delivery of returns for shareholders.
In addition, the multi-year incentives are structured so as to
encourage personal investment and ongoing shareholding in Reed
Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV securities among the senior
executive population in order to promote alignment with
shareholders and to provide focus on the share price.
Awards under the multi-year incentives take the form of restricted
shares and market value options which typically vest over a period
of three years except for the REGP under which awards vest over
three and five years. The vesting of all awards made to executive
directors under these plans is subject to meeting a number of
stretching performance targets based on internal financial
metrics and total shareholder return. Additionally, in the case
of ESOS, a financial pre-grant performance condition applies
which determines the annual size of the available grant pool
for all participants in the plan.
Reed Elsevier growth Plan (REgP)
The key features of the REGP are summarised below.
REED ELSEvIER gRoWTH PLaN (REgP)
Feature
Frequency of award
Eligibility
Detail
One-off arrangement
Awards were made on 26 May 2010
CEO and CFO of Reed Elsevier Group plc
As a condition of participation, the executive directors were required to hold Reed Elsevier
securities on the date of grant to the value of 300% of salary in the case of the CEO and 200%
of salary in the case of the CFO. Any personal shares invested under the BIP did not count
towards this holding requirement
The executive directors are required to maintain shareholdings at the respective levels
throughout the life of the plan (i.e. for five years) or until such time as they cease to be eligible for
further payouts under the plan, if earlier
Performance period
Five years split into an initial period of three financial years followed by a further two
financial years
Performance conditions
Opportunity to receive partial payout after three years
Relative TSR measured against three comparator groups, adjusted EPS and ROIC (see section
entitled ‘Performance measures and targets’)
The performance metrics have equal weighting, with one third of the award vesting based on
performance against the respective metric (additive measurement)
Vesting scale
Cap
Performance hurdle and scaled vesting
The number of shares capable of vesting is capped at 150% of the number comprised in the initial
performance share award
Dividend equivalents
Dividend equivalents accrue during the performance period and are paid out in cash when the
shares are released, to the extent that the underlying securities vest
Other provisions
On a change of control, awards vest on a pro-rated basis and subject to performance based on
an assessment of progress against targets at the time the change of control occurs
Claw-back applies
Awards under the plan are satisfied with shares purchased in the market
reed elsevier annual reports and Financial statements 2011
69
MecHanIcS
the chart below illustrates how the reGp operates
3 YEARS: 2010-12
H1 2013
2 YEARS: 2013-14
50% of
performance
shares are
released
Release of remaining 50% of the
performance shares is deferred until
H1 of 2015 subject to continued employment
Subject to performance against three metrics,
up to a 1 for 1 match can be earned over years
4 and 5 on the deferred performance shares
Performance share
award of 600%
of salary
Performance
tested
EPS
1/3RD
TSR
1/3RD
Performance
share award
ROIC
1/3RD
EPS
1/3RD
TSR
1/3RD
ROIC
1/3RD
On the date of grant the CEO committed 300% of salary and the
CFO 200% of salary in shares to the plan which must be retained
throughout the life of the plan or until the executive directors cease
to be eligible for further payouts, if earlier
Subject to performance against three metrics,
up to a 1 for 1 match can be earned over years
4 and 5 on the personal shareholding committed
under the plan
Overall payout from the plan to each executive director is capped at 150% of the shares comprised in the performance share award
H1 2015
Release of deferred
performance shares
Release of matching
shares earned
Release of committed
holding – the
regular shareholding
guidelines continue
to apply to the
executive directors
Performance measures and targets
Total Shareholder return (TSr)
the vesting of one third of the reGp award is subject to reed
elsevier’s tsr performance compared against three comparator
groups (the tsr tranche).
as reed elsevier accesses equity capital markets through three
exchanges – London, amsterdam and new York – in three
separate currency zones, three distinct comparator groups are
used – a sterling comparator Group, a euro comparator Group
and a us dollar comparator Group. the tsr performance of
reed elsevier pLc ordinary shares (based on the London listing)
is measured against the sterling comparator Group, the tsr
performance of reed elsevier nV ordinary shares (based on the
amsterdam listing) is measured against the euro comparator
Group; and the tsr performance of reed elsevier pLc adrs
and reed elsevier nV adrs (based on the new York listing) is
measured against the us dollar comparator Group. the
averaging period applied for tsr measurement purposes is six
months prior to the start of the financial year in which the award
was made and the final six months of the last financial year of the
performance period.
tsr performance is measured separately against each
comparator group and the proportion of the tsr tranche that
vests is the sum of the payouts achieved against the three
comparator groups.
3 year period:
2010-12
tsr ranking within the
relevant tsr
comparator group
Vesting percentage
of each third of the
tsr tranche
Below median
median
upper quartile
0%
30%
100%
5 year period:
2010-14
Vesting percentage
of each third of the
tsr tranche
0%
30%
100%
Vesting is on a straight-line basis for ranking between the median
and the upper quartile.
TSr comparators groups
the constituents of each comparator group were selected on the
following basis:
companies included in the relevant market index as at
31 december 2009 and nearest in size to reed elsevier in terms
of market capitalisation.
the relevant market indices are: (1) Ftse 100 for the sterling
comparator Group; (2) euronext100 and the daX 30 for the
euro comparator Group; and (3) the s&p 500 for the us dollar
comparator Group.
the following companies were excluded for this purpose:
– companies with mainly domestic revenues (as they do not
reflect the global nature of reed elsevier’s customer base);
– those engaged in extractive industries (as they are exposed to
commodity cycles); and
– financial services companies (as they have a different risk/
reward profile).
relevant listed global peers operating in businesses similar to
those of reed elsevier not otherwise included were added to
the relevant comparator group.
set out overleaf are the comparators included in each currency
group applicable to awards made in 2010 under the reGp.
o
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
70
govERNaNCE
DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION REPORT
Sterling
Comparator
group*
Aggreko
AstraZeneca
Autonomy Corp.
BAE Systems
British Airways
British American Tobacco
Bunzl
Burberry Group
Cobham
Compass Group
DMGT
Diageo
Experian
GlaxoSmithKline
Intercontinental Hotels
Imperial Tobacco Group
Informa
Inmarsat
International Power
Intertek Group
Invensys
Johnson Matthey
Kingfisher
National Grid
Pearson
Reckitt Benckiser Group
Rexam
Rolls-Royce Group
SABMiller
Sage Group
Shire
Smith & Nephew
Smiths Group
Thomas Cook Group
TUI Travel
Unilever (LSE)
United Business Media
Vodafone
Wolseley
WPP
Euro
Comparator
group*
Accor
Adidas
Ahold
Air Liquide
Akzo Nobel
Alstom
ASML Holding
BASF
BMW
Carrefour
Christian Dior
Daimler
Deutsche Post
EADS
Essilor Intl.
Heineken
Hermes Intl.
K+S
Lafarge
Lagardère Groupe
Linde
LVMH
MAN
Metro
Michelin
Pernod-Ricard
Philips Eltn. Koninklijke
Portugal Telecom SGPS
PPR
Renault
Saint-Gobain
SAP
Schneider Electric
Suez Environnement
Thales
ThyssenKrupp
TNT
Unilever (AEX)
Vallourec
Veolia Environnement
Volkswagen
Wolters Kluwer
US Dollar
Comparator
group*
3M
Adobe Systems
Agilent Techs.
Air Prds. & Chems.
Amazon.com
Analog Devices
Applied Mats.
Avon Products
Baxter Intl.
Becton Dickinson
Caterpillar
Colgate-Palmolive
Corning
Cummins
Deere
Dow Chemical
Dun & Bradstreet
E. I. du Pont de Nemours
eBay
Emerson Electric
Fico
Ford Motor
Genzyme
H.J. Heinz
Illinois Tool Works
John Wiley
Johnson Controls
Juniper Networks
Life Technologies
McDonalds
McGraw-Hill
Micron Technology
Motorola
News Corp
Nike
Nvidia
Paccar
PPG Industries
Spectra Energy
Texas Insts.
Thomson Reuters (NYSE)
United Technologies
Yum! Brands
*Reflects the composition of the comparator group as at the date of grant.
Return on invested capital (RoIC)
The vesting of one third of the REGP award is subject to the
percentage return on invested capital of Reed Elsevier PLC and
Reed Elsevier NV (the ROIC tranche) as follows:
3 years:
2010-12
2 years:
2013-14
Vesting percentage
of ROIC tranche
ROIC in 2012, subject to
actual exceeding 2009
ROIC calculated on the
same basis
Below 10.2%
10.2%
11.2% or above
ROIC in 2014
Below 10.7%
10.7%
12.7% or above
0%
60%
100%
Vesting is on a straight-line basis for performance between the
minimum and maximum levels.
For the purposes of the plan, the following definitions apply:
Invested capital = arithmetic average of the opening and closing
capital employed for the Reed Elsevier combined businesses
for the financial year with all cumulative amortisation and
impairment charges for acquired intangible assets and
goodwill added back. In addition, any exceptional restructuring
and acquisition integration charges (net of tax) are capitalised
for these purposes and changes in exchange rates and
movements in pension deficits are excluded.
Return = adjusted operating profit for the Reed Elsevier
combined businesses before amortisation and impairment
of acquired intangible assets and goodwill, exceptional
restructuring and acquisition integration charges. In addition,
it is grossed up to exclude the equity share of taxes in joint
ventures and further adjusted to exclude net pension financing
credit movement, after applying the effective rate of tax used
for adjusted earnings calculations and using exchange rates
to match those used in the calculation of invested capital.
In order to ensure that the performance score achieved is a fair
reflection of underlying business performance, the Committee
retains discretion to determine the treatment of major disposals
and acquisitions that require board approval. Any significant
adjustments made to the final performance score will be
disclosed to shareholders.
adjusted earnings per share (EPS)
The vesting of one third of the REGP award is subject to
performance against growth in adjusted earnings per share
measured at constant currencies (Adjusted EPS) (the EPS
tranche) as follows:
3 years:
2010-12
2 years:
2013-14
Vesting percentage
of EPS tranche
Average Adjusted
EPS growth in years
2011 and 2012
(subject to average
Adjusted EPS growth over
the whole three year
period being positive)
Below 5% p.a.
5% p.a.
9% p.a. or above
Average
Adjusted
EPS growth over
the two year
period
Below 7% p.a.
7% p.a.
13% p.a. or above
0%
60%
100%
Vesting is on a straight-line basis for performance between the
minimum and maximum levels.
For the purposes of the plan, the following definitions apply:
Earnings = adjusted reported earnings measured at constant
currencies. Adjustments include amortisation and impairment
of acquired intangible assets and goodwill, exceptional
restructuring and acquisition integration charges, gains/
losses on business disposals and tax rate anomalies (deferred
tax). The Committee retains discretion to adjust for changes in
the net pension financing credit.
Number of shares = weighted average number of shares in
issue excluding shares held in treasury.
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
71
A multi-year incentive award was granted to senior leaders below
the Board in 2011. Grants are made on a rolling three year basis
and awards are in the form of performance shares that vest
subject to the same performance metrics and vesting scales
applicable to the REGP and the targets set for each metric are
aligned to the five-year performance scale applicable to the
executive directors under the REGP.
Executive Share option Scheme (ESoS)
The key features of the ESOS are summarised below.
Feature
Frequency of award
Eligibility
Vesting period
Detail
Annual grant of market value options
Broadest multi-year incentive operated by Reed Elsevier
Annual awards are made to approximately 1,000 employees across some 20+ countries including
the executive directors
Three years from the date of grant
Options are exercisable between three and ten years from the date of grant or on cessation of
employment (for defined categories of approved leavers), if earlier
Performance conditions
Pre-grant performance condition of adjusted EPS growth which determines the size of the annual
grant pool available for grants to all participants (see below)
Post-grant performance hurdle of adjusted EPS growth applicable to the vesting of awards to
executive directors
Cap
Maximum annual award (in terms of the aggregate market value of the shares under option at the
Other provisions
date of grant) of three times salary per executive director
On a change of control, awards vest subject to performance based on an assessment of progress
against targets at the time the change of control occurs; participants may exchange their awards
for awards in the acquiring company, if available
Claw-back applies
Awards under the plan are satisfied with newly issued shares
The size of the total grant pool available for all participants in a
given year is determined based on growth in average compound
adjusted EPS measured in constant currencies (Adjusted EPS)
over the three years prior to grant as follows:
Average Adjusted EPS growth p.a.
over the three years prior to grant
% of the 2003 grant pool
available for distribution
Less than 6%
6% or more but less than 8%
8% or more but less than 10%
10% or more but less than 12%
12% or more
50%
75%
100%
125%
150%
Adjusted EPS growth for the three years ended 31 December 2011
was less than 6% p.a. which means that the available grant pool for
ESOS awards in 2012 is 50% of the 2003 pool.
During 2011, the executive directors received each a grant of
150% of base salary of market value options (50% of the permitted
maximum). The vesting of the award is subject to an Adjusted EPS
growth hurdle of 6% p.a.
During the year the 2008-10 cycle of ESOS lapsed for executive
directors as a result of EPS performance being below the
threshold required for vesting. Prior to the date of this Report, the
Committee determined that the 2009-11 cycle of ESOS also lapsed
for executive directors as the Adjusted EPS growth hurdle of 8%
p.a. on vesting was not achieved.
Bonus Investment Plan (BIP)
The bonus investment plan is a voluntary plan aimed at
encouraging personal investment in, and ongoing holding of, Reed
Elsevier shares to promote greater alignment with shareholders
and support the retention of key talent. The current bonus
investment plan was approved by shareholders at the 2010 Annual
General Meetings of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV and
replaced the bonus investment plan implemented in 2003.
Under the BIP, participants may invest their own funds to purchase
Reed Elsevier securities or allocate securities already owned
outright for investment under the plan up to a specified maximum.
In return, the participant is granted a matching award which vests
over three years subject to performance (i.e. a maximum match of
1 for 1 can be earned on the personal investment). It is a condition
of vesting that the underlying personal investment is retained
throughout the vesting period. Dividend equivalents accrue on the
matching shares during the vesting period and are paid out in cash
at the end to the extent that the matching award vests. The table
overleaf summarises the key features of the BIP.
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
72
govERNaNCE
DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION REPORT
Feature
Frequency of award
Eligibility
Performance period
Performance conditions
Vesting scale
Personal investment
Other provisions
Detail
Annual grants of matching awards
Ten-year life of the plan
Implemented in 2010 with first matching awards granted in May 2010
Approximately 150 senior executives including executive directors
Participation is voluntary
Three financial years
Average adjusted EPS growth measured in constant currencies and ROIC (see below)
50% of the award is subject to adjusted EPS growth and 50% subject to ROIC
Performance hurdle and scaled vesting
Up to 100% of the target bonus opportunity net of tax
On a change of control, awards vest on a pro-rated basis and subject to performance based on
an assessment of progress against targets at the time the change of control occurs, unless the
Committee determines that awards should not vest and instead be exchanged for equivalent
awards over shares in the acquiring company (i.e. rollover applies)
Claw-back applies
Awards under the plan are satisfied with shares purchased in the market
The following targets and vesting scale apply to awards granted
under the BIP in 2011:
cycle of LTIP had also lapsed as the minimum performance hurdle
of 10% adjusted EPS growth was not met.
Match earned on personal
investment
Average growth in Adjusted EPS
(%) over
the 3 year performance period
0%
50%
75%
100%
below 4% p.a.
4% p.a.
6.5% p.a.
9% p.a. or above
ROIC (%) in the
third year of the
performance
period
below 10.4%
10.4%
10.9%
11.4% or above
The same EPS targets as set out in the table above will apply to
awards of matching shares to be granted in 2012 under the 2012-14
cycle of the plan. The targets applicable to the ROIC proportion will
be increased to 11.0% at threshold and 12.0% at maximum with
straight-line vesting for performance between the points. The
executive directors will be eligible to participate in BIP in 2012.
The vesting scale and performance metrics applicable to awards
granted in 2010 under the BIP are the same as above, except that
the EPS proportion is measured over years two and three of the
performance period (i.e. 2011 and 2012) with vesting of the EPS
component being subject to average EPS growth over the whole
three year vesting period being positive. The targets applicable to
the ROIC proportion under the 2010-12 cycle were 0.2% lower than
the targets applicable to the 2011-13 cycle, with a threshold of
10.2% and maximum vesting for achieving ROIC of 11.2% or above
in the third year of the performance period. Straight-line vesting
applies for performance between the points.
Long Term Incentive Plan (LTIP)
No awards under the LTIP were given to executive directors in 2011
and no awards will be made in 2012.
Awards under this plan were in the form of restricted shares, with
half of the award being over shares in Reed Elsevier PLC and the
other half over shares in Reed Elsevier NV. A three year
performance period applies and awards vest based on the growth
in average compound adjusted EPS growth measured at constant
currencies and Reed Elsevier’s TSR performance compared to a
group of industry peers. The 2008-10 cycle of LTIP lapsed during
2011 as a result of performance conditions not being met. At the
date of this Report, it had also been determined that the 2009-11
No further award cycles remain outstanding under this plan at the
date of this Report.
Shareholding requirement
The Committee believes that one of the aspects that creates closer
alignment between senior management and shareholders is to
require executives to build up and maintain a significant personal
stake in Reed Elsevier. The shareholding requirements applicable
to the executive directors are set out in the table below and, as
described on page 68, were pre-requisites to participate in the
REGP. Shareholding requirements also apply to selected senior
executives below the Board.
Meeting the relevant shareholding requirement is both a condition
of the vesting of awards as well as a pre-requisite to maintain
eligibility to receive future awards under the multi-year
incentives.
On 31 December 2011, the executive directors’ shareholdings were
as follows (valued at the mid-market closing prices of Reed
Elsevier securities):
Shareholding requirement
(in % of 31 December 2011
annualised base salary)
Actual shareholding as at
31 December 2011
(in % of 31 December 2011
annualised base salary)
Erik Engstrom
Mark Armour
300%
200%
396%
376%
other employee share plans
UK-based executive directors are eligible to participate in the
HMRC approved all-employee UK Savings-Related Share Option
Scheme (SAYE).
Retirement benefits
Retirement benefit provisions are set in the context of the total
remuneration for each executive director, taking account of age
and service and against the background of evolving legislation
and practice in Reed Elsevier’s major countries of operation.
Base salary is the only pensionable element of remuneration.
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
73
Erik Engstrom and Mark Armour are provided with UK defined
benefit pension arrangements under which they accrue a pension
of 1/30th of salary for every year of service (up to a maximum of
two thirds of salary). The pension is provided through a
combination of:
the main UK Reed Elsevier Pension Scheme for salary
restricted to a cap, determined annually on the same basis as
the pre-April 2006 Inland Revenue earnings cap, and
Reed Elsevier’s unapproved pension arrangement for salary
above the cap.
Prior to 1 November 2007, Erik Engstrom was not a member of
any company pension scheme and Reed Elsevier made annual
contributions of 19.5% of his salary to his personal pension plan.
From 1 November 2007 contributions to his designated retirement
account ceased and he became a member of the UK defined
benefit pension arrangement.
Transfer values of accrued pension benefits
The pension arrangements for the directors include life
assurance cover while in employment, an entitlement to a pension
in the event of ill health or disability and a spouse’s and/or
dependants’ pension on death.
The increase in the transfer value of the directors’ pensions, after
deduction of contributions, is shown in the table below. Transfer
values have been calculated in accordance with the guidance note
GN11 published by the UK Institute of Actuaries and Faculty of
Actuaries. The transfer values at 31 December 2011 have been
calculated using the transfer value basis adopted by the trustees
of the pension scheme from 1 October 2008.
The transfer value in respect of individual directors represents a
liability in respect of directors’ pension entitlement, and is not an
amount paid or payable to the director.
Transfer
value
of accrued
pension at
31 December
2010
Transfer
value
of accrued
pension at
31 December
2011
Increase in
transfer
value during
the year
(net of
director’s
contributions)
Age at
31 December
2011
Director’s
contributions
Erik Engstrom
Mark Armour
48
57
£7,377
£7,377
£1,366,389
£5,643,891
£2,099,132
£6,758,053
£725,366
£1,106,785
Accrued
annual
pension at
31 December
2011
£142,375
£354,522
Increase in
accrued
annual
pension
during
the year
£36,799
£29,097
Transfer
value at
31 December
2011 of
increase
in accrued
pension
during the year
(net of inflation
and director’s
contributions)
£460,465
£249,862
Increase in
accrued
annual
pension
during
the year
(net of
inflation)
£31,732
£13,495
Service contracts
Executive directors are employed under service contracts that
provide for a maximum of one year’s notice. The contracts neither
specify a predetermined level of severance payment nor contain
specific provisions in respect of a change in control. The
Committee believes that, as a general rule, notice periods should
be 12 months and that the executive directors should, subject to
any legal constraints within their base country, be required to
mitigate their losses in the event of termination. The Committee
will, however, note local market conditions so as to ensure that the
terms offered are appropriate to attract and retain top executives
operating in global businesses.
The contractual terms of the executive directors (and for
approximately 100 other senior executives) include certain
covenants as follows:
non-competition restrictions apply which prevent the executive
from working in a capacity which competes with any Reed
Elsevier business which he/she was involved with during the
preceding 12 months; from recruiting Reed Elsevier employees
and from soliciting Reed Elsevier customers and suppliers for
a period of 12 months after leaving employment;
in the event of the executive resigning, he/she will immediately
lose all rights to any outstanding awards under the multi-year
incentives including any vested but unexercised options; and
in the event of a breach of the covenants, any gains made or
payouts received, in the period starting six months prior and
ending 12 months after leaving employment, on the vesting or
exercise of awards from the multi-year incentives may be
repayable.
Each executive director has a service contract with Reed Elsevier
Group plc, as summarised in the table below.
Current contract date
Date employment commenced
Expiry date (subject to notice period)
Notice period
Subject to
Erik Engstrom
Mark Armour
14 March 2011
7 October 1996
23 August 2004
1 February 1995
14 June 2028
Retires 31 December 2012
12 months
12 months
English law
English law
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
74
governance
directors’ remuneration report
Mark armour’s retirement terms
the following terms will apply to mark armour in connection with
his retirement on 31 december 2012:
his participation in the reGp will cease once the performance
share award has been performance-tested in 2013. all of the
performance shares earned will be released at that time and
dividend equivalents relating to the earned shares will be paid
in cash at the same time. the vesting of the performance
shares will be subject to the cap applicable to the reGp, with
the cap being pro-rated by 3/5th to reflect his years of actual
service during the performance period of 1 January 2010
through to 31 december 2014. He will not be eligible for a grant
of matching shares in 2013 and there will be no further
entitlement for payments under this plan;
his shareholding requirement under the reGp of two times
salary will cease in 2013, once the extent of any vesting of the
performance share award under the reGp has been
determined;
no esos award will be made to him in 2012;
existing covenants relating to non-competition, non-
solicitation and confidentiality will remain in place for
12 months post-retirement;
all unvested share-based awards will be treated in accordance
with the rules of the plans, and outstanding esos options
remain exercisable for up to three and a half years from
retirement;
he will be eligible to draw his pension under the uK reed
elsevier pension scheme and the unapproved pension
arrangement in accordance with the terms of those schemes
from 1 January 2013; and
no further payments will be due.
Policy on external appointments
the committee believes that the experience gained by allowing
executive directors to serve as non-executive directors on the
boards of other organisations is of benefit to reed elsevier.
accordingly, executive directors may, subject to the approval of the
chairman and the chief executive officer, serve as non-executive
directors on the boards of up to two non-associated companies (of
which only one may be to the board of a major company) and they
may retain remuneration arising from such appointments.
mark armour is a non-executive director of saBmiller plc and
received remuneration of £100,694 during 2011 (£59,610 during
2010 reflecting pro-rata payments since appointment).
Non-executive directors
Policy on non-executive directors’ fees
the policy on non-executive directors’ fees is a matter for the
Boards, subject to applicable law, and does not fall within the
committee’s remit.
reed elsevier seeks to recruit non-executive directors with the
experience to contribute to the boards of a dual-listed global
business and with a balance of personal skills that will make a
major contribution to the Boards and their committee structures.
With the exception of marike van Lier Lels who serves only on the
supervisory Board of reed elsevier nV, non-executive directors,
including the chairman, are appointed to the Boards of reed
elsevier Group plc, reed elsevier pLc and the supervisory Board
of reed elsevier nV. non-executive directors’ fees reflect the
directors’ membership of the three Boards.
the primary source for comparative market data is the practice of
Ftse 50 companies, although reference is also made to aeX and
us listed companies.
non-executive directors, including the chairman, serve under
letters of appointment and are not entitled to notice of, or
payments following, retirement from the Boards.
Fee levels
non-executive directors receive an annual fee in respect of their
memberships of the Boards of reed elsevier pLc, reed elsevier
nV and reed elsevier Group plc. the fee paid to marike van
Lier Lels, who serves only on the supervisory Board of reed
elsevier nV, reflects her time commitment to that company and to
other companies within the reed elsevier combined businesses.
non-executive directors are reimbursed for expenses incurred in
attending meetings. they do not receive any performance-related
bonuses, pension provision, share options or other forms of
benefit, except for the following: the chairman is in receipt of
private medical benefit and non-executive directors and the
chairman are provided with tax filing support to meet any tax filing
obligations arising from their directorships with reed elsevier in
countries other than their home country.
Fees may be reviewed annually, although in practice they have
changed on a less frequent basis. during 2011, fees were reviewed
for non-executive directors, supervisory Board members and
the chairman, taking account of market practice and general
governance trends. prior to that, fees for non-executive directors
and supervisory Board members had last been reviewed in 2007
and increased with effect from 1 January 2008 although a
separate fee for the senior independent director was introduced
with effect from 1 January 2011.
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
75
The changes in fees resulting from the 2011 review, which took
effect on 1 January 2012, are set out in the table below.
REED ELSEVIER NV v AEX – 5 YEARS
Chairman
Non-executive directors
Senior Independent Director
Chairman of:
– Audit Committee
– Remuneration Committee
annual fee 2012
Annual fee 2011
£550,000
£500,000
£65,000/€80,000 £55,000/€75,000
£20,000
£20,000
£25,000/€30,000 £15,000/€20,000
£15,000
£20,000
The total annual fee payable to Marike van Lier Lels is €65,000
(€48,000 in 2011). The Chairman of Reed Elsevier does not receive
committee chairman fees.
Total Shareholder Return graphs
As required by the Large and Medium-sized Companies and
Groups (Accounts and Reports) Regulations 2008, the graphs in
this section show the Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV
total shareholder return performance, assuming dividends were
reinvested. They compare the Reed Elsevier PLC performance
with that achieved by the FTSE 100, and the Reed Elsevier NV
performance with the performance achieved by the Euronext
Amsterdam (AEX) Index, over the five-year period from
31 December 2006 to 31 December 2011.
For the five-year period from 31 December 2006, the TSR for Reed
Elsevier PLC was 7.1%, against a FTSE 100 return of 5.9%. For
Reed Elsevier NV during the same period, TSR was minus 18.3%
against an AEX Index return of minus 27%. Reed Elsevier PLC is a
member of the FTSE 100 index and Reed Elsevier NV is a member
of the AEX Index. Therefore, these indices are relevant.
REED ELSEVIER PLC v FTSE 100 – 5 YEARS
120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Reed Elsevier PLC
FTSE 100
120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Reed Elsevier NV
AEX Index
For the purposes of the charts, the total shareholder return is
calculated on the basis of the average share price in the 30 trading
days prior to the respective year end and on the assumption that
dividends were reinvested.
Remuneration and share tables
The information set out in this section forms part of the audited
disclosures in this Report. For the purposes of the disclosures in
this section, the average exchange rates for the relevant year have
been used.
Directors’ emoluments and fees
aggregate emoluments
The emoluments of the directors of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed
Elsevier NV (including any entitlement to fees or emoluments
from either Reed Elsevier Group plc or Elsevier Reed Finance BV)
were as follows:
Salaries and fees
Benefits
Annual performance-related bonuses
Payments for loss of office
Pension contributions
Total
2011
£’000
2,590
56
1,634
–
42
4,322
2010
£’000
3,324
97
2,351
499
43
6,314
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
76
govERNaNCE
DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION REPORT
Individual fees of non-executive directors
Mark Elliott
Anthony Habgood
Adrian Hennah (from 20 April 2011)
Lisa Hook
Marike van Lier Lels (from 13 January 2010)
Robert Polet
Sir David Reid
Lord Sharman (until 20 April 2011)
Ben van der Veer
Total
2011
£ **
2010
£ **
70,000
500,000*
38,475
55,000
41,739***
55,000
75,000
18,333
82,609***
936,156
70,000
500,000*
–
55,000
39,744
55,000
55,000
63,750
71,225
909,719
*Excludes private medical insurance benefit of £1,329 in respect of 2011 (£1,244 in 2010).
** The above figures exclude an imputed notional benefit in respect of tax filing support provided to non-executive directors for tax filings in countries other than their home
country resulting from their directorship with Reed Elsevier. The incremental assessable benefit charge per relevant tax return has been agreed by PwC to amount to £300.
*** The fees for Marike van Lier Lels and Ben van der Veer are paid in euro and were €48,000 and €95,000 respectively for 2011. For reporting purposes these were converted
into pounds sterling at the average exchange rate for the year of reporting.
other required disclosures
No loans, advances or guarantees have been provided on behalf of any director.
The 2008-10 cycle of awards made under ESOS and LTIP lapsed for the executive directors as a result of performance conditions not
being met. The executive directors made no notional pre-tax gains during 2011 on any multi-year incentives (also none in 2010).
Individual emoluments of executive directors
Erik Engstrom
Mark Armour
Total
Salary
£
1,025,000
628,776
1,653,776
Benefits
£
28,492
22,988
51,480
Bonus
£
1,021,925
611,799
1,633,724
Total 2011
£
2,075,417
1,263,563
3,338,980
Total 2010
£
2,028,108
1,248,742
3,276,850
Market value options awarded under ESOS and restricted shares awarded in the year of reporting under the BIP are set out by executive
director on pages 77-78. Vesting is subject to performance conditions relating to growth in adjusted EPS and ROIC as described in the
front section of this Report. The maximum number of options that can vest under the ESOS and the maximum number of restricted
shares that can vest under the BIP is equivalent to the awards granted. Erik Engstrom was the highest paid director in 2011.
Directors’ shareholdings in Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier Nv
The interests of those individuals who were directors of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV as at 31 December 2011 in the issued
share capital of the respective companies at the beginning and end of the year are shown below.
Mark Armour
Mark Elliott
Erik Engstrom
Anthony Habgood
Adrian Hennah
Lisa Hook
Marike van Lier Lels
Robert Polet
Sir David Reid
Ben van der Veer
Reed Elsevier PLC
ordinary shares
Reed Elsevier NV
ordinary shares
1 January
2011*
31 December
2011
1 January
2011*
31 December
2011
248,742
–
107,040
50,000
–
–
–
–
–
–
248,742
–
107,040
50,000
5,163
–
–
1,000
–
–
136,889
–
383,450
25,000
–
–
–
–
–
1,298
136,889
7,600
447,356
25,000
–
–
–
–
–
5,000
*On date of appointment if subsequent to 1 January 2011.
There have been no changes in the interests of the directors in Reed Elsevier PLC or Reed Elsevier NV ordinary shares at the date of
this Report.
reed elsevier annual reports and Financial statements 2011
77
Share-based awards in reed elsevier PLc and reed elsevier nv
details of vested options (shown in orange) and unvested options and restricted shares held by executive directors in reed elsevier pLc
(pLc) and reed elsevier nV (nV) as at 31 december 2011 are shown in the tables below. the shading in the tables denotes awards
granted during the year of reporting. the vesting of outstanding unvested awards is subject to performance conditions in accordance
with the provisions of the respective plan rules. For disclosure purposes, any pLc and nV adrs awarded under the Bip have been
converted into ordinary share equivalents. at the date of this report there have been no changes in the options or restricted shares held
by executive directors in office at 31 december 2011 other than those relating to the 2009-11 cycles of esos and Ltip as disclosed on
pages 71 and 72. the market price at the date of award of grants made under the multi-year incentives are based on the middle market
price of the respective security.
Erik Engstrom
oPTIonS
esos
Ltip
total pLc ords
total nV ords
no. of
options
held on
1 Jan
2011
63,460
43,866
154,517
105,412
178,895
120,198
143,000
94,000
146,923
95,399
–
–
325,163
224,766
Year of
grant
2004
2005
2006
2008
2009
2011
2004
option
over:
pLc ord
nV ord
pLc ord
nV ord
pLc ord
nV ord
pLc ord
nV ord
pLc ord
nV ord
pLc ord
nV ord
pLc ord
nV ord
no. of
options
granted
during
2011
no. of
options
exercised
during
2011
market
price per
share at
exercise
Gross
gains
made on
exercise
£/€
option
price
£4.780
€10.30
£5.335
€11.31
£5.305
€11.47
£6.275
€12.21
£5.420
€9.415
£5.390
92,953 €8.969
£4.78
€10.30
139,146
1,011,958
683,641
139,146
92,953
no. of
shares
vested
during
2011
market
price per
share at
vesting
notional
gross
gains at
vesting
£/€
*Lapsed prior to the date of this report.
SHareS
Bip
Ltip
reGp
no. of
unvested
shares
held on
1 Jan
2011
140,378
68,500
45,000
103,902
67,465
643,086
no. of
shares
awarded
during
2011
market
price per
share at
award
€8.310
122,352 €8.969
£6.275
€12.21
£5.420
€9.415
£4.665
Year of
grant
2010
2011
2008
2009
2010
type of
security
nV ord
nV ord
pLc ord
nV ord
pLc ord
nV ord
pLc ord
nV ord
422,310
€8.310
total pLc ords
total nV ords
815,488
675,153
122,352
*Lapsed prior to the date of this report.
no. of
options
held on
31 dec
2011
63,460
43,866
154,517
105,412
178,895
120,198
–
–
146,923
95,399
139,146
92,953
325,163
224,766
1,008,104
682,594
no. of
unvested
shares
held on
31 dec
2011
140,378
122,352
–
–
103,902
67,465
643,086
422,310
746,988
752,505
unvested
options
vesting on:
options
exercisable
until:
23 aug 2014
23 aug 2014
17 Feb 2015
17 Feb 2015
13 mar 2016
13 mar 2016
Lapsed
Lapsed
Lapsed*
Lapsed*
5 may 2014 5 may 2021
5 may 2014 5 may 2021
23 aug 2014
23 aug 2014
date of
vesting
H1 2013
H1 2014
Lapsed
Lapsed
Lapsed*
Lapsed*
50% H1 2013
50% H1 2015
50% H1 2013
50% H1 2015
o
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
78
govERNaNCE
DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION REPORT
Mark Armour
No. of
options
held on
1 Jan
2011
62,974
44,882
74,000
51,926
150,422
102,618
158,836
106,720
144,000
94,000
147,692
95,899
–
–
290,481
199,467
2,173
Year of
grant
2001
2002
2005
2006
2008
2009
2011
2004
2010
Option
over:
PLC ord
NV ord
PLC ord
NV ord
PLC ord
NV ord
PLC ord
NV ord
PLC ord
NV ord
PLC ord
NV ord
PLC ord
NV ord
PLC ord
NV ord
PLC ord
No. of
options
granted
during
2011
No. of
options
exercised
during
2011
Market
price per
share at
exercise
Gross
gains
made on
exercise
£/€
Option
price
£6.590
€14.75
£6.000
€13.94
£5.335
€11.31
£5.305
€11.47
£6.275
€12.21
£5.420
€9.415
£5.390
85,358
57,021 €8.969
£4.872
€10.57
£4.176
oPTIoNS
ESOS
LTIP
SAYE
Total PLC ords
Total NV ords
No. of
shares
vested
during
2011
Market
price per
share at
vesting
Notional
gross
gains at
vesting
£/€
1,030,578
695,512
85,358
57,021
No. of
unvested
shares
held on
1 Jan
2011
65,054
42,512
–
–
67,000
44,000
76,397
49,605
394,495
259,062
602,946
395,179
No. of
shares
awarded
during
2011
Market
price per
share at
award
£4.665
€8.310
56,876
£5.390
37,687 €8.969
£6.275
€12.21
£5.420
€9.415
£4.665
€8.310
56,876
37,687
*Expired unexercised on 23 February 2011.
**Lapsed prior to the date of this Report.
SHaRES
BIP
LTIP
REGP
Year of
grant
2010
2011
2008
2009
2010
Type of
security
PLC ord
NV ord
PLC ord
NV ord
PLC ord
NV ord
PLC ord
NV ord
PLC ord
NV ord
Total PLC ords
Total NV ords
**Lapsed prior to the date of this Report.
No. of
options
held on
31 Dec
2011
–
–
74,000
51,926
150,422
102,618
158,836
106,720
–
–
147,692
95,899
85,358
57,021
290,481
199,467
2,173
908,962
613,651
No. of
unvested
shares
held on
31 Dec
2011
65,054
42,512
56,876
37,687
–
–
76,397
49,605
394,495
259,062
592,822
388,866
Unvested
options
vesting on:
Options
exercisable
until:
Expired*
Expired*
22 Feb 2012
22 Feb 2012
17 Feb 2015
17 Feb 2015
13 Mar 2016
13 Mar 2016
Lapsed
Lapsed
Lapsed**
Lapsed**
5 May 2014 5 May 2021
5 May 2014 5 May 2021
19 Feb 2014
19 Feb 2014
1 Aug 2013 1 Feb 2014
Date of
vesting
H1 2013
H1 2013
H1 2014
H1 2014
Lapsed
Lapsed
Lapsed**
Lapsed**
H1 2013
H1 2013
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
79
Approved by the Board of Reed Elsevier Group plc on
15 February 2012.
Mark Elliott
Chairman of the Remuneration Committee
Approved by the Board of Reed Elsevier PLC on
15 February 2012.
Mark Elliott
Non-Executive Director
Approved by the Combined Board of Reed Elsevier NV
on 15 February 2012.
Mark Elliott
Member of the Supervisory Board
other required disclosures in respect of share-based awards
The number of shares and options that vest in respect of all
outstanding (unvested) awards under the multi-year incentives
depend on the extent to which performance conditions are met.
In respect of the REGP, the maximum number of shares that can
vest is 150% of the number of shares shown in the tables above.
In respect of ESOS and BIP, the number of awards shown in the
table is the maximum capable of vesting. ESOS awards vest on
the third anniversary and expire on the tenth anniversary of the
date of grant. For LTIP, the number of shares shown in the share
tables reflects the target award.
Options under the SAYE scheme, in which all eligible UK
employees are invited to participate, are granted at a maximum
discount of 20% to the market price at time of grant. They are
normally exercisable after the expiry of three or five years from
the date of grant. No performance targets are attached to these
option grants as the SAYE is an all-employee scheme.
The middle market price of a Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary share
at the date of award of grants in 2011 under the BIP was £5.39.
The middle market price of a Reed Elsevier NV ordinary share
at the date of award of grants in 2011 under the BIP was €8.969.
The middle market price of a Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary share
during the year was in the range of £4.613 to £5.905 and at
31 December 2011 was £5.19. The middle market price of a Reed
Elsevier NV ordinary share during the year was in the range of
€7.588 to €10.27 and at 31 December 2011 was €9.007.
Dilution
At 31 December 2011, the estimated potential dilution over a
ten-year period from awards over Reed Elsevier PLC shares
under all share-based plans was 5.1% of the Reed Elsevier PLC
share capital. The estimated potential dilution over the same
period in respect of awards over Reed Elsevier NV shares was
5.3% of the Reed Elsevier NV share capital at 31 December 2011.
The estimated potential dilution in relation to executive
share-based plans was 4.6% of the Reed Elsevier PLC and 5% of
the Reed Elsevier NV share capital at 31 December 2011.
Employee Benefit Trust
Any securities required to satisfy entitlements under the REGP,
LTIP and BIP are provided by the Employee Benefit Trust (EBT) from
market purchases. As a potential beneficiary under the EBT in the
same way as other employees of Reed Elsevier, each executive
director is deemed to be interested in all the shares held by the EBT
which, at 31 December 2011, amounted to 14,051,025 Reed Elsevier
PLC ordinary shares (1.12% of issued share capital) and 7,380,906
Reed Elsevier NV ordinary shares (0.96% of issued share capital).
These numbers include ordinary share equivalents held in the
form of Reed Elsevier PLC ADRs and Reed Elsevier NV ADRs.
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
80
governance
RepoRt of the Audit Committees
Report of the Audit Committees
This report has been prepared by the audit committees of
reed elsevier PLc and reed elsevier nv in conjunction with the
audit committee of reed elsevier group plc (the committees)
and has been approved by the respective Boards. It provides
an overview of the membership, responsibilities and activities
of the committees.
Membership
the Committees each comprise at least three independent
non-executive directors. the members of each of the Committees
that served during the year are: Ben van der Veer (Chairman of the
Committees), Lisa hook, sir david Reid, Lord sharman (until his
retirement in April 2011) and Adrian hennah (from appointment
in April 2011). sir david Reid and Adrian hennah, both uK
chartered accountants, and Ben van der Veer, a registered
accountant in
the Netherlands, are considered to have significant, recent and
relevant financial experience. Biographies of the members of each
of the Committees are set out on pages 52 and 53 and details of the
number of meetings attended by each of the members are
provided on page 58.
Appointments to the Committees are made on the
recommendation of the Nominations Committee and are for
periods of up to three years, extendable by no more than two
additional three-year periods, so long as the member continues
to be independent. details of the remuneration policy in respect
of members of the Committees and the remuneration paid to
members for the year ended 31 december 2011 are set out in the
directors’ Remuneration Report on pages 63 to 79.
responsibilities
the main role and responsibilities of the Committees in relation to
the respective companies are set out in written terms of reference
and include:
(i)
to monitor the integrity of the financial statements of the
company, and any formal announcements relating to the
company’s financial performance, reviewing significant
financial reporting judgements contained therein;
(ii)
to review the company’s internal financial controls and the
company’s internal control and risk management systems;
(iii) to monitor and review the effectiveness of the company’s
internal audit function;
(iv) to make recommendations in relation to the appointment of
the external auditor and to approve the remuneration and
terms of engagement of the external auditor;
(v)
to review and monitor the external auditors’ independence
and objectivity and the effectiveness of the audit process,
taking into consideration relevant professional and
regulatory requirements; and
(vi) to develop and recommend policy on the engagement of the
external auditor to supply non audit services and to monitor
compliance.
the Committees report to the respective Boards on their activities
identifying any matters in respect of which they consider that
action or improvement is needed and making recommendations
as to the steps to be taken.
the Reed elsevier Group plc Audit Committee fulfils this role in
respect of the publishing and information operating business.
the functions of an audit committee in respect of the financing
activities are carried out by the supervisory Board of elsevier
Reed finance BV. the Reed elsevier pLC and Reed elsevier NV
Audit Committees fulfil their roles from the perspective of the
parent companies and both Committees have access to the
reports to and the work of the Reed elsevier Group plc Audit
Committee and the elsevier Reed finance BV supervisory Board
in this respect.
the Committees have explicit authority to investigate any matters
within their terms of reference and have access to all resources
and information that they may require for this purpose.
the terms of reference of each Audit Committee are reviewed
annually and a copy of each is published on the Reed elsevier
website, www.reedelsevier.com.
Principal activities
the Committees hold meetings five times a year: in January,
february, June, July and december, and reports on these meetings
are made to the respective Boards at the next board meetings. the
principal business of these meetings typically includes:
– January: review of critical accounting policies and practices,
and significant financial reporting issues and judgements arising
in connection with the annual financial statements, including
appropriateness of the going concern assumption; review of
risk management activities, compliance and internal control
effectiveness; reviewing and approving the internal audit plan;
review of internal audit findings; review of the Reed elsevier
policy on auditor independence and the fees paid to the external
auditor for audit and non audit services; review of information
technology security;
– february: review of external audit findings; review and
recommending for approval to the Boards of annual financial
statements, results announcement, annual report on
form 20-f and related formal statements; review of treasury
policy compliance;
– June: monitoring and assessing the qualification, performance,
expertise, resources, objectivity and independence of the
external auditors and the effectiveness of the external audit
process; agreeing the external audit plan; reviewing significant
financial reporting issues and judgements arising in connection
with the interim financial statements; review of significant
external financial reporting and regulatory developments;
review of tax policies: review of compliance activities; review
of report from external auditors on control matters; review of
internal audit findings;
– July: review of critical accounting policies and practices, and
significant financial reporting issues and judgements arising
in connection with the interim financial statements, including
appropriateness of the going concern assumption; review of
external audit findings; review and recommending for approval
to the Boards of the interim financial statements, results
announcement and related formal statements; review of risk
management activities and internal audit findings; review and
approval of the external audit engagement letters; review of
estimated external audit fees;
reed elsevier Annual Reports and financial statements 2011
81
– december: review of year end financial reporting and accounting
(v) reviewed and approved the internal audit plan for 2011
issues; review of significant external financial reporting and
regulatory developments; review of external audit findings to
date; review of internal audit findings; review of the terms of
reference and effectiveness of internal audit; review of the terms
of reference of the Audit Committees.
the Audit Committee meetings are typically attended by the Chief
financial officer, the Reed elsevier Group plc group financial
controller, chief risk officer and director of internal audit, and
audit partners of the external auditors. Additionally, the managing
director and senior representatives of the external auditors of
elsevier Reed finance BV attend the July and february meetings
of the parent company Audit Committees. At least one meeting
each year, the Committees meet separately with the external
auditors without management present. At least once annually, the
Chairman of the Audit Committee meets separately with the Reed
elsevier Group plc chief risk officer and director of internal audit.
in discharging their principal responsibilities in respect of the 2011
financial year, the Committees have:
(i)
received and discussed reports from the Reed elsevier Group
plc group financial controller that set out areas of significance
in the preparation of the financial statements, including:
review of the carrying values of goodwill and intangible
assets for possible impairment, review of estimated useful
lives of intangible assets, accounting for pensions and related
assumptions, accounting for share based remuneration
and related assumptions, review of the carrying value of
investments, accounting treatment for acquisitions and
disposals and business restructuring, application of revenue
recognition and cost capitalisation policies, review of tax
reserves and provisions for lease obligations, and the
use of the going concern basis in the preparation of the
financial statements.
(ii) reviewed the critical accounting policies and compliance
with applicable accounting standards and other disclosure
requirements and received regular update reports on
accounting and regulatory developments.
(iii) received and discussed regular reports on the management
of material risks and reviewed the effectiveness of the
systems of internal control. As part of this review, detailed
internal control evaluation and certification is obtained from
management across the operating businesses, reviewed by
internal audit and discussed with the Committees.
(iv) received and discussed regular reports from the Reed
elsevier Group plc chief risk officer and director of internal
audit summarising the status of the Reed elsevier risk
management activities and the findings from internal audit
reviews and the actions agreed with management. Areas of
focus in 2011 included: project management of development
spend, particularly in relation to the significant product and
infrastructure investment in the us legal business;
acquisition integration activities; regulatory compliance and
review of information security including the management of
data privacy; business continuity planning; and continued
compliance with the requirements of section 404 of the us
sarbanes-oxley Act relating to the documentation and
testing of internal controls over financial reporting.
and monitored execution, including progress in respect of
recommendations made. Reviewed the resources, budget
and effectiveness of the internal audit function.
(vi) received presentations from the Reed elsevier Group plc
vice president compliance on the compliance programmes,
including the operation of Reed elsevier’s codes of conduct,
training programmes, whistleblowing arrangements and
procedures in respect of the uK Bribery Act requirements;
from the Reed elsevier inc. general counsel on the
management of data privacy, security and compliance; and
from the Reed elsevier Group plc it security officer on
information technology security.
(vii) received updates from the Reed elsevier Group plc group
treasurer on pension arrangements and funding, compliance
with treasury policies and risk management, and on global
insurance arrangements.
(viii) received a presentation from the Reed elsevier Group plc
head of group taxation on tax policies and related matters.
(ix) received regular updates from the chief financial officer on
developments within the finance function.
(x) received presentations on a rotational basis from the chief
financial officers of major businesses on the priorities for
the finance functions of those businesses and the risk
management and internal control activities.
the external auditors have attended all meetings of the
Committees. they have provided written reports at the february,
June, July and december meetings summarising the most
significant findings from their audit work. these reports have been
discussed by the Committees and actions agreed where necessary.
external audit effectiveness
the Audit Committees have the delegated responsibility for
reviewing the effectiveness of the external audit and overseeing
the independence and objectivity of the auditors. Reed elsevier
has a well established policy on audit effectiveness and
independence of auditors that sets out inter alia: the
responsibilities of each Audit Committee in the selection of
auditors to be proposed for appointment or reappointment at the
respective annual general meeting and for agreement on the
terms of their engagement and the scope of the annual audit; the
auditor independence requirements and the policy on the
provision of non audit services; the rotation of audit partners and
staff; and the conduct of meetings between the auditors and the
Audit Committees. the policy is available on the Reed elsevier
website, www.reedelsevier.com.
the auditors are precluded from engaging in non audit services
that would compromise their independence or violate any
professional requirements or regulations affecting their
appointment as auditors. in general, the auditors may not provide
a service which creates a mutuality of interest; places the auditor
in a position to audit their own work; results in the auditor acting in
a capacity akin to that of a company manager or employee; or puts
the auditor in the role of advocate for the company. the policy sets
out specific services that may not be provided by the auditors.
the auditors may, however, provide non audit services which do
o
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
f
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
82
governance
RepoRt of the Audit Committees
not conflict with their independence, and where their skills and
experience make them a logical supplier of the services, subject to
pre-approval by the Audit Committee. the Committees have, each
quarter, reviewed and agreed the non audit services provided in
2011, together with the associated fees which are set out in note 3
to the combined financial statements. the non audit services
provided were in the areas of tax compliance, due diligence and
other transaction related services.
the external auditors are required to rotate the lead audit
partners responsible for the audit engagements every five years.
the lead engagement partner for Reed elsevier pLC has now
completed his third year of auditing Reed elsevier’s financial
statements and the lead engagement partner for Reed elsevier
NV has completed two years. Any decision to open the audit to
tender is taken only on the recommendation of the Committees.
the external auditors have confirmed their independence
and compliance with the Reed elsevier policy on auditor
independence.
the Committees conducted an annual review during 2011 of the
performance of the external auditors and the effectiveness of the
external audit process for the year ended 31 december 2010. As
part of this process, the Committees reviewed the report on the
external auditors by the Audit inspection unit of the uK financial
Reporting Council issued in June 2011. Based on these reviews,
and on their subsequent observations on the planning and
execution of the external audit for the year ended 31 december
2011, the Committees have recommended to the respective
Boards that resolutions for the reappointment of the external
auditors be proposed at the forthcoming Annual General
meetings. deloitte LLp and deloitte Accountants BV or their
predecessor deloitte firms were first appointed respectively
auditors of Reed elsevier pLC and Reed elsevier NV for the
financial year ended 31 december 1994. in addition to the annual
review of the performance of the external auditors and the
effectiveness of the audit process, at least every four years the
Committees will consider whether the objectives of the audit
would be better served through a formal tender process for the
auditor appointment.
the effectiveness of the operation of the Audit Committees was
reviewed as part of the effectiveness review of the Boards in
february 2012.
Ben van der veer
Chairman of the Audit Committees
15 february 2012
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
83
Financial
statements
and other
information
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
In this section
84 Combined financial statements
88 Accounting policies
94 Notes to the combined
financial statements
122 Independent auditors’ report
123 Summary combined financial
information in euros
137 Reed Elsevier PLC Annual Report and
Financial Statements
161 Reed Elsevier NV Annual Report and
Financial Statements
185 Additional information for US investors
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
84
FInancIal statEmEnts and othER InFoRmatIon
COmBINEd FINANCIAL StAtEmENtS
Combined income statement
FoR thE YEaR EndEd 31 dEcEmBER
Revenue
Cost of sales
Gross profit
Selling and distribution costs
Administration and other expenses
Operating profit before joint ventures
Share of results of joint ventures
operating profit
Finance income
Finance costs
Net finance costs
disposals and other non operating items
Profit before tax
taxation
net profit for the year
Attributable to:
Parent companies’ shareholders
Non-controlling interests
net profit for the year
Note
1
2
7
7
8
9
Combined statement of comprehensive income
FoR thE YEaR EndEd 31 dEcEmBER
net profit for the year
Exchange differences on translation of foreign operations
Actuarial losses on defined benefit pension schemes
Fair value movements on available for sale investments
Fair value movements on cash flow hedges
transfer to net profit from hedge reserve (net of tax)
tax recognised directly in equity
other comprehensive (expense)/income for the year
total comprehensive income for the year
Attributable to:
Parent companies’ shareholders
Non-controlling interests
total comprehensive income for the year
Note
5
18
9
2011
£m
6,002
(2,126)
3,876
(1,075)
(1,626)
1,175
30
1,205
17
(252)
(235)
(22)
948
(181)
767
760
7
767
2011
£m
767
32
(113)
(1)
(24)
37
42
(27)
740
733
7
740
2010
£m
6,055
(2,209)
3,846
(1,091)
(1,687)
1,068
22
1,090
8
(284)
(276)
(46)
768
(120)
648
642
6
648
2010
£m
648
94
(63)
–
(58)
46
29
48
696
690
6
696
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
Combined statement of cash flows
FoR thE YEaR EndEd 31 dEcEmBER
cash flows from operating activities
Cash generated from operations
Interest paid
Interest received
tax paid (net)
net cash from operating activities
cash flows from investing activities
Acquisitions
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
Expenditure on internally developed intangible assets
Purchase of investments
Proceeds from disposals of property, plant and equipment
Net proceeds from other disposals
dividends received from joint ventures
net cash used in investing activities
cash flows from financing activities
dividends paid to shareholders of the parent companies
distributions to non-controlling interests
Increase/(decrease) in short term bank loans, overdrafts and commercial paper
Repayment of other loans
Repayment of finance leases
Acquisition of non-controlling interests
Proceeds on issue of ordinary shares
net cash used in financing activities
Note
11
11
85
2011
£m
2010
£m
1,735
(247)
12
(218)
1,282
(481)
(85)
(265)
(10)
7
80
33
(721)
(497)
(9)
210
(248)
(22)
(48)
9
(605)
1,649
(295)
8
(9)
1,353
(50)
(83)
(228)
(5)
7
6
24
(329)
(483)
(8)
(143)
(394)
(7)
–
11
(1,024)
decrease in cash and cash equivalents
11
(44)
–
movement in cash and cash equivalents
At start of year
decrease in cash and cash equivalents
Exchange translation differences
at end of year
742
(44)
28
726
734
–
8
742
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
86
FInancIal statEmEnts and othER InFoRmatIon
COmBINEd FINANCIAL StAtEmENtS
Combined statement of financial position
as at 31 dEcEmBER
non-current assets
Goodwill
Intangible assets
Investments in joint ventures
Other investments
Property, plant and equipment
Net pension assets
deferred tax assets
current assets
Inventories and pre-publication costs
trade and other receivables
derivative financial instruments
Cash and cash equivalents
assets held for sale
total assets
current liabilities
trade and other payables
derivative financial instruments
Borrowings
taxation
Provisions
non-current liabilities
Borrowings
deferred tax liabilities
Net pension obligations
Provisions
liabilities associated with assets held for sale
total liabilities
net assets
capital and reserves
Combined share capitals
Combined share premiums
Combined shares held in treasury
translation reserve
Other combined reserves
combined shareholders’ equity
Non-controlling interests
total equity
Note
14
15
16
16
17
5
19
20
21
11
22
23
24
26
24
19
5
26
22
28
28
28
29
2011
£m
4,729
3,494
124
64
288
–
212
8,911
190
1,483
149
726
2,548
44
11,503
2,657
69
982
677
39
4,424
3,300
1,236
242
87
4,865
17
9,306
2,197
223
2,723
(663)
88
(199)
2,172
25
2,197
2010
£m
4,441
3,457
136
48
291
55
151
8,579
228
1,475
134
742
2,579
–
11,158
2,584
80
516
646
71
3,897
3,786
1,192
225
88
5,291
–
9,188
1,970
224
2,754
(677)
29
(387)
1,943
27
1,970
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
Combined statement of changes in equity
Balance at 1 January 2010
total comprehensive income
for the year
dividends paid
Issue of ordinary shares,
net of expenses
decrease in share based
remuneration reserve
Settlement of share awards
Exchange differences on
translation of capital
and reserves
Balance at 1 January 2011
total comprehensive income
for the year
dividends paid
Issue of ordinary shares,
net of expenses
Increase in share based
remuneration reserve
Acquisitions
Acquisition of
non-controlling interests
Settlement of share awards
Exchange differences on
translation of capital
and reserves
Balance at 31 december 2011
note
13
13
combined
share
capitals
£m
combined
share
premiums
£m
combined
shares held
in treasury
£m
translation
reserve
£m
other
combined
reserves
£m
combined
shareholders’
equity
£m
non-
controlling
interests
£m
225
2,807
(698)
(100)
(502)
1,732
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
11
–
–
–
–
–
–
9
(1)
224
(64)
2,754
12
(677)
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
9
–
–
–
–
(1)
223
(40)
2 ,723
–
–
–
–
–
–
7
7
(663)
94
–
–
–
–
35
29
32
–
–
–
–
–
–
27
88
596
(483)
690
(483)
–
(7)
(9)
11
(7)
–
18
–
(387)
1,943
701
(497)
733
(497)
–
27
–
(43)
(7)
9
27
–
(43)
–
7
–
(199)
2,172
27
6
(8)
–
–
–
2
27
7
(9)
–
–
5
(5)
–
–
25
87
total
equity
£m
1,759
696
(491)
11
(7)
–
2
1,970
740
(506)
9
27
5
(48)
–
–
2,197
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
88
FInancIal statEmEnts and othER InFoRmatIon
ACCOUNtING POLICIES
Accounting policies
the Reed Elsevier combined financial statements are prepared in
accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards
(IFRS) as endorsed by the European Union and as issued by the
International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). the combined
financial statements are prepared on a going concern basis, as
explained on pages 60 and 61.
Adjusted operating profits are also grossed up to exclude the
equity share of taxes in joint ventures. Adjusted operating cash
flow is measured after dividends from joint ventures and net
capital expenditure, but before payments in relation to exceptional
restructuring and acquisition related costs. Reconciliations
between reported and adjusted figures are provided in note 10.
the Reed Elsevier accounting policies under IFRS are set out below.
Basis of preparation
the equalisation agreement between Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed
Elsevier NV has the effect that their shareholders can be regarded
as having the interests of a single economic group. the Reed
Elsevier combined financial statements (“the combined financial
statements”) represent the combined interests of both sets of
shareholders and encompass the businesses of Reed Elsevier
Group plc and Elsevier Reed Finance BV and their respective
subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures, together with the
two parent companies, Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV
(“the combined businesses”).
In preparing the combined financial statements, subsidiaries of
Reed Elsevier Group plc and Elsevier Reed Finance BV are
accounted for under the purchase method and investments in
associates and joint ventures are accounted for under the equity
method. All transactions and balances between the combined
businesses are eliminated.
On acquisition of a subsidiary, or interest in an associate or joint
venture, fair values, reflecting conditions at the date of acquisition,
are attributed to the net assets, including identifiable intangible
assets acquired. this includes those adjustments made to bring
accounting policies into line with those of the combined
businesses. the results of subsidiaries sold or acquired are
included in the combined financial statements up to or from the
date that control passes from or to the combined businesses.
Non-controlling interests in the net assets of the combined
businesses are identified separately from combined
shareholders’ equity. Non-controlling interests consist of the
amount of those interests at the date of the original acquisition
and the non-controlling share of changes in equity since the date
of acquisition.
these financial statements form part of the statutory information
to be provided by Reed Elsevier NV, but are not for a legal entity
and do not include all the information required to be disclosed by a
company in its financial statements under the UK Companies Act
2006 or the dutch Civil Code. Additional information is given in the
Annual Reports and Financial Statements of the parent companies
set out on pages 137 to 184. A list of principal businesses is set out
on page 194.
In addition to the figures required to be reported by applicable
accounting standards, adjusted profit and operating cash flow
figures have been presented as additional performance
measures. Adjusted figures are shown before amortisation of
acquired intangible assets, exceptional restructuring and
acquisition related costs, disposal gains and losses and other non
operating items, related tax effects and movements in deferred
taxation assets and liabilities that are not expected to crystallise
in the near term and include the benefit of tax amortisation where
available on acquired goodwill and intangible assets.
Foreign exchange translation
the combined financial statements are presented in pounds
sterling. Additional information providing a translation into euros
of the primary Reed Elsevier combined financial statements and
selected notes is presented on pages 123 to 136.
transactions in foreign currencies are recorded at the rate of
exchange prevailing on the date of the transaction. At each
statement of financial position date, monetary assets and
liabilities that are denominated in foreign currencies are
retranslated at the rate prevailing on the statement of financial
position date. Exchange differences arising are recorded in the
income statement other than where hedge accounting applies
as set out below.
Assets and liabilities of foreign operations are translated at
exchange rates prevailing on the statement of financial position
date. Income and expense items and cash flows of foreign
operations are translated at the average exchange rate for the
period. Significant individual items of income and expense and
cash flows in foreign operations are translated at the rate
prevailing on the date of transaction. Exchange differences arising
are classified as equity and transferred to the translation reserve.
When foreign operations are disposed of, the related cumulative
translation differences are recognised within the income
statement in the period.
Reed Elsevier uses derivative financial instruments, primarily
forward contracts, to hedge its exposure to certain foreign
exchange risks. details of Reed Elsevier’s accounting policies
in respect of derivative financial instruments are set out below.
Revenue
Revenue represents the invoiced value of sales less anticipated
returns on transactions completed by performance, excluding
customer sales taxes and sales between the combined
businesses.
Revenues are recognised for the various categories of turnover
as follows: subscriptions – on periodic despatch of subscribed
product or rateably over the period of the subscription where
performance is not measurable by despatch; circulation and
transactional – on despatch or occurrence of the transaction;
advertising – on publication or over the period of online display;
and exhibitions – on occurrence of the exhibition.
Where sales consist of two or more independent components
whose value can be reliably measured, revenue is recognised
on each component as it is completed by performance, based on
attribution of relative value.
Employee benefits
the expense of defined benefit pension schemes and other
post-retirement employee benefits is determined using the
projected unit credit method and charged in the income statement
as an operating expense, based on actuarial assumptions
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
89
reflecting market conditions at the beginning of the financial year.
Actuarial gains and losses are recognised in full in the statement
of comprehensive income in the period in which they occur.
Past service costs are recognised immediately to the extent that
benefits have vested, or, if not vested, on a straight line basis over
the period until the benefits vest.
Net pension obligations in respect of defined benefit schemes are
included in the statement of financial position at the present value
of scheme liabilities, less the fair value of scheme assets. Where
schemes are in surplus, i.e. assets exceed liabilities, the net
pension assets are separately included in the statement of
financial position. Any net pension asset is limited to the extent
that the asset is recoverable through reductions in future
contributions.
the expense of defined contribution pension schemes and other
employee benefits is charged in the income statement as incurred.
share based remuneration
the fair value of share based remuneration is determined at the
date of grant and recognised as an expense in the income
statement on a straight line basis over the vesting period, taking
account of the estimated number of shares that are expected to
vest. market based performance criteria are taken into account
when determining the fair value at the date of grant. Non-market
based performance criteria are taken into account when
estimating the number of shares expected to vest. the fair value of
share based remuneration is determined by use of a binomial or
monte Carlo simulation model as appropriate. All Reed Elsevier’s
share based remuneration is equity settled.
Borrowing costs
Borrowing costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition,
construction or production of an asset that takes a substantial
period of time to bring to use are capitalised. All other interest
on borrowings is expensed as incurred. the cost of issuing
borrowings is generally expensed over the period of borrowing
so as to produce a constant periodic rate of charge.
taxation
the tax expense represents the sum of the tax payable on the
current year taxable profits, adjustments in respect of prior year
taxable profits, and the movements on deferred tax that are
recognised in the income statement.
the tax payable on current year taxable profits is calculated using
the applicable tax rates that have been enacted, or substantively
enacted, by the date of the statement of financial position.
deferred tax is the tax arising on differences between the carrying
amounts of assets and liabilities in the financial statements and
their corresponding tax bases used in the computation of taxable
profit, and is accounted for using the balance sheet liability
method. deferred tax liabilities are generally recognised for
all taxable temporary differences and deferred tax assets are
recognised to the extent that, based on current forecasts,
it is probable that taxable profits will be available against which
deductible temporary differences can be utilised. deferred tax
is not recognised on temporary differences arising in respect
of goodwill that is not deductible for tax purposes.
deferred tax is calculated using tax rates that have been
substantively enacted at the date of the statement of financial
position. Full provision is made for deferred tax which would
become payable on the distribution of retained profits from foreign
subsidiaries, associates or joint ventures.
movements in deferred tax are charged or credited in the income
statement, except when they relate to items charged or credited
directly to equity, in which case the deferred tax is also recognised
in equity. deferred tax credits in respect of share based
remuneration are recognised in equity to the extent that expected
tax deductions exceed the related expense.
Goodwill
On the acquisition of a subsidiary or business, the purchase
consideration is allocated between the net tangible and intangible
assets on a fair value basis, with any excess purchase consideration
representing goodwill. Goodwill arising on acquisitions also
includes amounts corresponding to deferred tax liabilities
recognised in respect of acquired intangible assets.
Goodwill is recognised as an asset and reviewed for impairment
at least annually. Any impairment is recognised immediately in
the income statement and not subsequently reversed.
On disposal of a subsidiary or business, the attributable amount
of goodwill is included in the determination of the profit or loss
on disposal.
Intangible assets
Intangible assets acquired as part of a business combination are
stated in the statement of financial position at their fair value as at
the date of acquisition, less accumulated amortisation. Internally
generated intangible assets are stated in the statement of
financial position at the directly attributable cost of creation
of the asset, less accumulated amortisation.
Intangible assets acquired as part of business combinations
comprise: market related assets (e.g. trademarks, imprints,
brands); customer related assets (e.g. subscription bases,
customer lists, customer relationships); editorial content;
software and systems (e.g. application infrastructure, product
delivery platforms, in-process research and development);
contract based assets (e.g. publishing rights, exhibition rights,
supply contracts); and other intangible assets. Internally
generated intangible assets typically comprise software and
systems development where an identifiable asset is created that
is probable to generate future economic benefits.
Intangible assets, other than brands and imprints determined
to have indefinite lives, are amortised systematically over their
estimated useful lives. the estimated useful lives of intangible
assets with finite lives are as follows: market and customer
related assets – 3 to 40 years; content, software and other
acquired intangible assets – 3 to 20 years; and internally
developed intangible assets – 3 to 10 years. Brands and imprints
determined to have indefinite lives are not amortised and are
subject to impairment review at least annually.
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
90
FInancIal statEmEnts and othER InFoRmatIon
ACCOUNtING POLICIES
Property, plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment are stated in the statement of
financial position at cost less accumulated depreciation. No
depreciation is provided on freehold land. Freehold buildings and
long leases are depreciated over their estimated useful lives up to
a maximum of 50 years. Short leases are written off over the
duration of the lease. depreciation is provided on other assets
on a straight line basis over their estimated useful lives as follows:
leasehold improvements – shorter of life of lease and 10 years;
plant – 3 to 20 years; office furniture, fixtures and fittings – 5 to 10
years; computer systems, communication networks and
equipment – 3 to 7 years.
Investments
Investments, other than investments in joint ventures and
associates, are stated in the statement of financial position at
fair value. Investments held as part of the venture capital portfolio
are classified as held for trading, with changes in fair value
reported through the income statement. All other investments
are classified as available for sale with changes in fair value
recognised directly in equity until the investment is disposed of or
is determined to be impaired, at which time the cumulative gain or
loss previously recognised in equity is brought into the net profit or
loss for the period. All items recognised in the income statement
relating to investments, other than investments in joint ventures
and associates, are reported as non operating items.
Available for sale investments and venture capital investments
held for trading represent investments in listed and unlisted
securities. the fair value of listed securities is determined based
on quoted market prices, and of unlisted securities on
management’s estimate of fair value based on standard valuation
techniques, including market comparisons and discounts of future
cash flows, having regard to maximising the use of observable
inputs and adjusting for risk. Independent valuation experts are
used as appropriate.
Investments in joint ventures and associates are accounted for
under the equity method and stated in the statement of financial
position at cost as adjusted for post-acquisition changes in Reed
Elsevier’s share of net assets, less any impairment in value.
Impairment
At each statement of financial position date, reviews are carried
out of the carrying amounts of tangible and intangible assets and
goodwill to determine whether there is any indication that those
assets have suffered an impairment loss. If any such indication
exists, the recoverable amount, which is the higher of value in use
and fair value less costs to sell, of the asset is estimated in order
to determine the extent, if any, of the impairment loss. Where the
asset does not generate cash flows that are independent from
other assets, value in use estimates are made based on the cash
flows of the cash generating unit to which the asset belongs.
Intangible assets with an indefinite useful life are tested for
impairment at least annually and whenever there is any indication
that the asset may be impaired.
If the recoverable amount of an asset or cash generating unit is
estimated to be less than its net carrying amount, the net carrying
amount of the asset or cash generating unit is reduced to its
recoverable amount. Impairment losses are recognised
immediately in the income statement in administration and
other expenses.
Inventories and pre-publication costs
Inventories and pre-publication costs are stated at the lower of
cost, including appropriate attributable overhead, and estimated
net realisable value. Pre-publication costs, representing costs
incurred in the origination of content prior to publication, are
expensed systematically reflecting the expected sales profile
over the estimated economic lives of the related products,
generally up to five years.
leases
Assets held under leases which confer rights and obligations
similar to those attaching to owned assets are classified as assets
held under finance leases and capitalised within property, plant
and equipment or software and the corresponding liability to
pay rentals is shown net of interest in the statement of financial
position as obligations under finance leases. the capitalised value
of the assets is depreciated on a straight line basis over the
shorter of the periods of the leases or the useful lives of the
assets concerned. the interest element of the lease payments
is allocated so as to produce a constant periodic rate of charge.
Operating lease rentals are charged to the income statement
on a straight line basis over the period of the leases. Rental income
from operating leases is recognised on a straight line basis over
the term of the relevant lease.
cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash balances, call deposits
and other short term highly liquid investments and are held in the
statement of financial position at fair value.
assets held for sale
Assets of businesses that are available for immediate sale in their
current condition and for which a sales process has been initiated
are classified as assets held for sale, and are carried at the lower of
amortised cost and fair value less costs to sell. Non-current assets
are not amortised or depreciated following their classification as
held for sale. Liabilities of businesses held for sale are also
separately classified on the statement of financial position.
Financial instruments
Financial instruments comprise investments (other than
investments in joint ventures or associates), trade receivables,
cash and cash equivalents, payables and accruals, provisions,
borrowings and derivative financial instruments.
Investments (other than investments in joint ventures and
associates) are classified as either held for trading or available
for sale, as described above. (these investments are classified
as either Level 1 or 2 in the IFRS 7 fair value hierarchy.)
trade receivables are carried in the statement of financial position
at invoiced value less allowance for estimated irrecoverable
amounts. Irrecoverable amounts are estimated based on the
ageing of trade receivables, experience and circumstance.
Borrowings (other than fixed rate borrowings in designated
hedging relationships and for which the carrying value is adjusted
to reflect changes in the fair value of the hedged risk), payables,
accruals and provisions are recorded initially at fair value and
subsequently at amortised cost.
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
91
derivative financial instruments are used to hedge interest rate
and foreign exchange risks. Changes in the fair value of derivative
financial instruments that are designated and effective as hedges
of future cash flows are recognised (net of tax) directly in equity in
the hedge reserve. If a hedged firm commitment or forecasted
transaction results in the recognition of a non financial asset or
liability, then, at the time that the asset or liability is recognised,
the associated gains or losses on the derivative that had previously
been recognised in equity are included in the initial measurement
of the asset or liability. For hedges that do not result in the
recognition of an asset or a liability, amounts deferred in equity
are recognised in the income statement in the same period in which
the hedged item affects net profit or loss. Any ineffective portion
of hedges is recognised immediately in the income statement.
derivative financial instruments that are not designated as
hedging instruments are classified as held for trading and
recorded in the statement of financial position at fair value, with
changes in fair value recognised in the income statement.
Where an effective hedge is in place against changes in the fair
value of fixed rate borrowings, the hedged borrowings are
adjusted for changes in fair value attributable to the risk being
hedged with a corresponding income or expense included in the
income statement within finance costs. the offsetting gains or
losses from remeasuring the fair value of the related derivatives
are also recognised in the income statement within finance costs.
When the related derivative expires, is sold or terminated, or no
longer qualifies for hedge accounting, the cumulative change in
fair value of the hedged borrowing is amortised in the income
statement over the period to maturity of the borrowing using the
effective interest method.
the fair values of interest rate swaps, interest rate options,
forward rate agreements and forward foreign exchange contracts
represent the replacement costs calculated using observable
market rates of interest and exchange. the fair value of long term
borrowings is calculated by discounting expected future cash
flows at observable market rates. (these instruments are
accordingly classified as Level 2 in the IFRS 7 fair value hierarchy.)
Cash flow hedge accounting is discontinued when a hedging
instrument expires or is sold, terminated or exercised, or no
longer qualifies for hedge accounting. At that time, any cumulative
gain or loss on the hedging instrument recognised in equity is
either retained in equity until the firm commitment or forecasted
transaction occurs, or, where a hedged transaction is no longer
expected to occur, is immediately credited or expensed in the
income statement.
Provisions
Provisions are recognised when a present obligation exists as a
result of a past event, the obligation is reasonably estimable and
it is probable that settlement will be required. Provisions are
measured at the best estimate of the expenditure required to
settle the obligation at the statement of financial position date.
shares held in treasury
Shares of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV that are
repurchased by the respective parent companies and not
cancelled are classified as shares held in treasury. the
consideration paid, including directly attributable costs, is
recognised as a deduction from equity. Shares of the parent
companies that are purchased by the Reed Elsevier Group plc
Employee Benefit trust are also classified as shares held in
treasury, with the cost recognised as a deduction from equity.
critical judgements and key sources of estimation uncertainty
the most significant accounting policies in determining the
financial condition and results of the Reed Elsevier combined
businesses, and those requiring the most subjective or complex
judgement, relate to the valuation of goodwill and intangible
assets, share based remuneration, pensions, litigation, taxation,
and property provisioning.
Goodwill and intangibles
On acquisition of a subsidiary or business, the purchase
consideration is allocated between the net tangible and intangible
assets other than goodwill on a fair value basis, with any excess
purchase consideration representing goodwill. the valuation of
acquired intangible assets represents the estimated economic
value in use, using standard valuation methodologies, including
as appropriate, discounted cash flow, relief from royalty and
comparable market transactions. Acquired intangible assets
are capitalised and amortised systematically over their estimated
useful lives, subject to impairment review.
Appropriate amortisation periods are selected based on
assessments of the longevity of the brands and imprints, the
strength and stability of customer relationships, the market
positions of the acquired assets and the technological and
competitive risks that they face. Certain intangible assets in
relation to acquired science and medical publishing businesses
have been determined to have indefinite lives. the longevity of
these assets is evidenced by their long established and well
regarded brands and imprints, and their characteristically
stable market positions.
the carrying amounts of goodwill and indefinite lived intangible
assets in each business are reviewed for impairment at least
annually. the carrying amounts of all other intangible assets are
reviewed where there are indications of possible impairment.
An impairment review involves a comparison of the carrying
value of the asset with estimated values in use based on latest
management cash flow projections. Key areas of judgement in
estimating the values in use of businesses are the growth in cash
flows over a five-year forecast period, the long term growth rate
assumed thereafter and the discount rate applied to the forecast
cash flows.
the discount rates used are based on the Reed Elsevier weighted
average cost of capital, adjusted to reflect a risk premium specific
to each business. the pre-tax discount rates applied are 11.5% for
Elsevier, 12.0% for LexisNexis Risk Solutions, 12.0% for
LexisNexis Legal & Professional, 12.0-12.5% for Reed Exhibitions
and 11.5-13.0% for Reed Business Information. the nominal long
term growth rates, which are based on historical growth rates and
the growth prospects for businesses, do not exceed 3%. there
were no charges for impairment of acquired intangible assets
and goodwill in 2011 (2010: nil).
A sensitivity analysis has been performed based on changes
in key assumptions considered to be reasonably possible by
management: an increase in the discount rate of 0.5%; a decrease
in the compound annual growth rate for adjusted operating cash
flow in the five-year forecast period of 2.0%; and a decrease in
perpetuity growth rates of 0.5%. the sensitivity analysis shows
that no impairment charges would result under any of the
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
92
FInancIal statEmEnts and othER InFoRmatIon
ACCOUNtING POLICIES
sensitivity scenarios. Further information is provided in note 14 to
the combined financial statements.
Share based remuneration
Share based remuneration is determined based on the fair value
of an award at the date of grant, and is spread over the vesting
period on a straight line basis, taking into account the number of
shares that are expected to vest. the fair value of awards is
determined at the date of grant by use of a binomial or monte Carlo
simulation model as appropriate, which requires judgements to
be made regarding share price volatility, dividend yield, risk free
rates of return and expected option lives. the number of awards
that are expected to vest requires judgements to be made
regarding forfeiture rates and the extent to which performance
conditions will be met. the assumptions are determined in
conjunction with independent actuaries based on historical
data and trends.
Provisions for liabilities are recognised when it is probable that a
settlement is required. Although the outcome of legal proceedings
is uncertain, the ultimate resolution of such matters is not
expected to have a material impact on results.
Taxation
Reed Elsevier is subject to tax in numerous jurisdictions, giving
rise to complex tax issues that require management to exercise
judgment in making tax determinations. While Reed Elsevier is
confident that tax returns are appropriately prepared and filed, the
application of tax law and practice is subject to some uncertainty
and amounts are provided in respect of this. Issues are raised
during the course of regular tax audits and discussions including
on the deductibility of interest in the US on certain cross-border
financing are ongoing. Although the outcome of open items cannot
be predicted, no material impact on results is expected from
such issues.
the assumptions of share price volatility of 29%, of expected share
option life of four years, and of expected lapse rate of 2-5% are
based on relevant historical data. Other judgements made on
grant are based on market data. Assumptions as to future
performance against non market related vesting conditions are
based on management estimates. the charge for share based
and related remuneration was £27m in 2011 (2010: £11m). Further
information is provided in note 6 to the combined financial
statements.
Pensions
Accounting for defined benefit pension schemes involves
judgement about uncertain events, including the life expectancy
of the members, salary and pension increases, inflation, the
return on scheme assets and the rate at which the future
pension payments are discounted. Estimates for these factors
are used in determining the pension cost and liabilities reported
in the financial statements. these best estimates of future
developments are made in conjunction with independent
actuaries. Each scheme is subject to a periodic review by
independent actuaries.
the principal assumptions as at 31 december 2011, expressed
as a weighted average of the various defined benefit pension
schemes, were a discount rate of 5.2% (2010: 5.6%; 2009: 5.8%),
an expected return on scheme assets of 6.2% (2010: 6.8%; 2009:
7.0%), an expected rate of salary increases of 3.5% (2010: 4.1%;
2009: 4.0%) and inflation of 2.9% (2010: 3.2%; 2009: 3.1%). Future
pension increases are assumed at 2.9% (2010: 3.2%; 2009: 3.1%)
and average life expectancy of 87-90 years (2010: 87-89 years) for
scheme members currently aged 45 and 60 years. the net defined
benefit pension expense was £23m (2010: £22m). Excluding the
net pension financing credit, the service cost was £57m (2010:
£48m) after pension curtailment credits of £9m (2010: £17m)
from changes to pension plan design and staff reductions.
the net pension financing credit is based on market data at
the beginning of the year and was £34m (2010: £26m) reflecting
the higher market value of scheme assets. Further information
and sensitivity analysis is provided in note 5 to the combined
financial statements.
Litigation
Reed Elsevier is involved in various legal proceedings, which
arise in the normal course of its business, relating to commercial
disputes, employment, data security and product liability.
Reed Elsevier’s policy in respect of deferred taxation is to provide
in full for all taxable temporary differences using the balance
sheet liability method. deferred tax assets are only recognised
to the extent that they are considered recoverable based on
forecasts of available taxable profits against which they can
be utilised over the near term.
Property provisions
Reed Elsevier has exposures to sub-lease shortfalls in respect
of certain property leases for periods up to 2024. Provisions are
recognised for net liabilities expected to arise on these exposures.
Estimation of the provisions requires judgement in respect of
future head lease costs, sub lease income and the length of
vacancy periods. the charge for property provisions was
£16m (2010: £36m) relating to surplus property arising on the
restructuring, sale and closure of RBI businesses and includes
expected losses on sub leases entered into during 2011 and an
estimate of vacancy periods and future market conditions.
Further information is provided in note 26 to the combined
financial statements.
Other significant accounting policies
the accounting policies in respect of revenue recognition,
pre-publication costs and development spend are also significant
in determining the financial condition and results of the Reed
Elsevier combined businesses, although the application of
these policies is more straightforward.
Revenue recognition policies, while an area of management
focus, are generally straightforward in application as the timing
of product or service delivery and customer acceptance for the
various revenue types can be readily determined. Allowances for
product returns are deducted from revenues based on historical
return rates. Where sales consist of two or more components that
operate independently, revenue is recognised as each component
is completed by performance, based on attribution of relative
value.
Pre-publication costs incurred in the creation of content prior to
production and publication are typically deferred and expensed
over their estimated useful lives based on sales profiles. Such
costs typically comprise direct internal labour costs and
externally commissioned editorial and other fees. Estimated
useful lives generally do not exceed five years. Annual reviews
are carried out to assess the recoverability of carrying amounts.
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
93
development spend embraces investment in new product and
other initiatives, ranging from the building of new online delivery
platforms, to launch costs of new services, to building new
infrastructure applications. Launch costs and other operating
expenses of new products and services are expensed as incurred.
the costs of building product applications and infrastructure are
capitalised as intangible assets and amortised over their
estimated useful lives. Impairment reviews are carried out at
least annually.
standards and amendments effective for the year
the interpretations and amendments to IFRS effective for 2011
have not had a significant impact on Reed Elsevier’s accounting
policies or reporting.
standards, amendments and interpretations not yet effective
New accounting standards and amendments and their expected
impact on the future accounting policies and reporting of Reed
Elsevier are set out below.
IAS19 – Employee Benefits (Revised) (effective for the 2013
financial year). the revised standard inter alia changes the
methodology to be used in the calculation of the net pension
financing credit or charge in relation to defined benefit pension
schemes. Under the revised standard, pension asset returns
included within the net pension financing credit or charge are
to be calculated by reference to the discount rate of a high quality
corporate bond (being also the discount rate applied in the
calculation of pension obligations) and no longer based on the
expected returns on scheme assets. typically the effect will be
to reduce the asset returns recognised in the income statement.
Comparative figures will be restated. the revised standard also
prohibits the use of certain accounting alternatives, previously
permitted, that enabled the smoothing of volatility in the income
statement and balance sheet in relation to pensions. this will not
affect Reed Elsevier’s pension accounting as such alternatives
were not applied. there is no change to the measurement of
pension scheme assets and obligations under the revised
standard for Reed Elsevier.
IFRS9 – Financial Instruments (effective for the 2015 financial
year). the standard replaces the existing classification and
measurement requirements in IAS39 for financial assets by
requiring entities to classify them as being measured either at
amortised cost or fair value depending on the business model
and contractual cash flow characteristics of the asset. For
financial liabilities, IFRS9 requires an entity choosing to
measure a liability at fair value to present the portion of the
change in its fair value due to changes in the entity’s own credit
risk in the other comprehensive income rather than the income
statement. Adoption of the standard is not expected to have
a significant impact on the measurement, presentation or
disclosure of financial assets and liabilities in the combined
financial statements.
IFRS10 – Consolidated Financial Statements (effective for
the 2013 financial year). the standard introduces a single
consolidation model for all entities based on control, irrespective
of the nature of the investee. IFRS10 replaces IAS27 – Separate
Financial Statements. Adoption of the standard is not expected
to significantly impact the measurement, presentation or
disclosure of the consolidation of entities in the combined
financial statements.
IFRS11 – Joint Arrangements (effective for the 2013 financial year).
this standard classifies joint arrangements as either joint
ventures or a joint operation and removes the option to
proportionately consolidate joint ventures. IFRS11 replaces IAS28
– Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures. Adoption of the
standard is not expected to significantly impact the measurement,
presentation or disclosure of the joint ventures in the combined
financial statements.
IFRS12 – disclosure of Interests in Other Entities (effective for
the 2013 financial year). the standard combines the disclosure
requirements for subsidiaries, joint arrangements, associates
and unconsolidated structured entities into one standard.
Adoption of the standard may result in additional disclosures
in the combined financial statements but is not expected to have
a significant impact on Reed Elsevier’s reporting.
IFRS13 – Fair Value measurement (effective for the 2013 financial
year). the standard consolidates the guidance and disclosure
requirements of fair value measurement contained throughout
IFRS and also requires new disclosures related to valuation
techniques and inputs into fair value measurements. Adoption
of the standard is not expected to significantly impact the
measurement, presentation or disclosure of financial assets
and liabilities in the combined financial statements.
IAS1 – Presentation of Items of Other Comprehensive Income
– Amendments to IAS1 (effective for the 2012 financial year).
the standard amends the grouping of items presented in the
statement of comprehensive income into items that may be
reclassified (or recycled) to the profit or loss in a future period and
items that will never be reclassified. Adoption of the standard will
lead to some re-presentation of the items in the statement of
comprehensive income in the combined financial statements.
Additionally, a number of interpretations have been issued which
are not expected to have any significant impact on Reed Elsevier’s
accounting policies and reporting.
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
94
Financial statements and other inFormation
Notes to the combiNed fiNaNcial statemeNts
Notes to the combined financial statements
for the year ended 31 december 2011
1 Segment analysis
Reed elsevier’s reported segments are based on the internal reporting structure and financial information provided to the chief
executive officer and boards.
Reed elsevier is a world leading provider of professional information solutions organised in 2011 as five business segments: elsevier,
providing scientific, technical and medical information solutions; lexisNexis Risk solutions, providing risk information and analytics to
business and government customers; lexisNexis legal & Professional, providing legal, tax, regulatory and business information
solutions to professionals, business and government customers; Reed exhibitions, organising trade exhibitions and conferences; and
Reed business information, providing information and marketing solutions to business professionals.
With effect from 1 January 2011 lexisNexis was reorganised as two separate businesses, lexisNexis Risk solutions and lexisNexis
legal & Professional, which are accordingly now presented separately. comparative figures have been restated on a proforma basis as
if the businesses had operated separately in the prior year.
adjusted operating profit is one of the key financial measures used by management to evaluate performance and allocate resources. it is
stated before amortisation of acquired intangible assets, exceptional restructuring (none in 2011), the share of profit on disposals in joint
ventures, acquisition related costs, and is grossed up to exclude the equity share of taxes in joint ventures. adjusted operating profit is
reconciled to operating profit in note 10.
analysis by business segment
revenue
operating profit
adjusted operating profit
elsevier
lexisNexis Risk solutions
lexisNexis legal & Professional
Reed exhibitions
Reed business information
sub-total
corporate costs
Unallocated net pension financing credit
total
2011
£m
2,058
908
1,634
707
695
6,002
–
–
6,002
2010
£m
2,026
927
1,691
693
718
6,055
–
–
6,055
2011
£m
695
181
144
132
68
1,220
(49)
34
1,205
2010
£m
647
165
159
127
–
1,098
(34)
26
1,090
2011
£m
768
362
229
167
110
1,636
(44)
34
1,626
2010
£m
724
354
238
158
89
1,563
(34)
26
1,555
Revenue is analysed before the £128m (2010: £116m) share of joint ventures’ revenue, of which £23m (2010: £24m) relates to lexisNexis
legal & Professional, principally to Giuffrè, £103m (2010: £89m) relates to Reed exhibitions and £2m (2010: £3m) relates to Reed
business information.
share of post-tax results of joint ventures of £30m (2010: £22m) included in operating profit comprises £4m (2010: £4m) relating to
lexisNexis legal & Professional, £25m (2010: £17m) relating to Reed exhibitions and £1m (2010: £1m) relating to Reed business
information. the unallocated net pension credit of £34m (2010: £26m) comprises the expected return on pension scheme assets of
£235m (2010: £217m) less interest on pension scheme liabilities of £201m (2010: £191m).
analysis oF revenue by geographical origin
North america
United Kingdom
the Netherlands
Rest of europe
Rest of world
total
2011
£m
3,103
947
616
783
553
6,002
2010
£m
3,213
907
620
825
490
6,055
reed elsevier annual Reports and financial statements 2011
1 Segment analysis continued
analysis oF revenue by geographical market
North america
United Kingdom
the Netherlands
Rest of europe
Rest of world
total
analysis oF revenue by type
subscriptions
circulation/transactions
advertising
exhibitions
other
total
analysis by business segment
elsevier
lexisNexis Risk solutions
lexisNexis legal & Professional
Reed exhibitions
Reed business information
total
expenditure on
acquired goodwill and
intangible assets
capital
expenditure
additions
amortisation
of acquired
intangible assets
depreciation and
other amortisation
2011
£m
43
–
–
36
532
611
2010
£m
13
–
34
6
1
54
2011
£m
94
23
203
22
18
360
2010
£m
81
31
179
12
12
315
2011
£m
72
156
78
24
29
359
2010
£m
75
149
72
23
30
349
2011
£m
69
26
87
10
15
207
2010
£m
74
29
94
14
26
237
capital expenditure comprises additions to property, plant and equipment and internally developed intangible assets. amortisation
of acquired intangible assets includes amounts in respect of joint ventures of £4m (2010: £4m) in Reed exhibitions. other than the
depreciation and amortisation above, non cash items include a £27m charge (2010: £7m credit) relating to the recognition of share based
remuneration, comprising £5m (2010: £2m credit) in elsevier, £3m (2010: £2m) in lexisNexis Risk solutions, £6m (2010: £1m credit) in
lexisNexis legal & Professional; £3m (2010: £1m credit) in Reed exhibitions, £2m (2010: £3m credit) in Reed business information and
£8m (2010: £2m credit) in corporate.
analysis oF non-current assets by geographical location
North america
United Kingdom
the Netherlands
Rest of europe
Rest of world
total
2011
£m
6,984
517
123
783
292
8,699
2010
£m
6,716
456
140
851
210
8,373
Non-current assets by geographical location exclude amounts relating to deferred tax and net pension assets.
95
2010
£m
3,303
490
204
1,131
927
6,055
2010
£m
2,709
1,760
491
675
420
6,055
2011
£m
3,219
485
189
1,095
1,014
6,002
2011
£m
2,819
1,649
437
700
397
6,002
o
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
f
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
96
Financial statements and other inFormation
Notes to the combiNed fiNaNcial statemeNts
Notes to the combined financial statements
for the year ended 31 december 2011
2 Operating profit
operating profit is stated after charging/(crediting) the following:
staff costs
Wages and salaries
social security costs
Pensions
share based and related remuneration
total staff costs
depreciation and amortisation
amortisation of acquired intangible assets
share of joint ventures’ amortisation of acquired intangible assets
amortisation of internally developed intangible assets
depreciation of property, plant and equipment
total depreciation and amortisation
other expenses and income
Pre-publication costs, inventory expenses and other cost of sales
operating lease rentals expense
operating lease rentals income
depreciation and amortisation charges are included within administration and other expenses.
3 Auditors’ remuneration
auditors’ remuneration
for audit services
for non audit services
total auditors’ remuneration
Note
5
15
15
17
2011
£m
1,535
173
62
27
1,797
355
4
132
75
566
2010
£m
1,594
179
54
11
1,838
345
4
158
79
586
2,126
116
(11)
2,209
123
(11)
2011
£m
4.7
1.1
5.8
2010
£m
4.5
1.2
5.7
auditors’ remuneration for audit services comprises £0.5m (2010: £0.4m) payable to the auditors of the parent companies and £4.2m
(2010: £4.1m) payable to the auditors of the parent companies and their associates for the audit of the financial statements of the
operating and financing businesses, including the review and testing of internal controls over financial reporting in accordance with the
Us sarbanes-oxley act. auditors’ remuneration for non audit services comprises: £0.7m (2010: £0.9m) for taxation services, £0.2m
(2010: £0.3m) for other audit related services and £0.2m (2010: nil) for due diligence and other transaction related services. Reed
elsevier’s policy on auditor independence is set out on pages 81 and 82.
reed elsevier annual Reports and financial statements 2011
97
4 Personnel
number oF people employed
business segment
elsevier
lexisNexis Risk solutions
lexisNexis legal & Professional
Reed exhibitions
Reed business information
sub-total
corporate/shared functions
total
geographical location
North america
United Kingdom
the Netherlands
Rest of europe
Rest of world
total
5 Pension schemes
at 31 december
average during the year
2011
2010
2011
2010
6,900
4,000
10,300
2,800
5,600
29,600
900
30,500
16,000
4,600
1,600
3,700
4,600
30,500
6,700
4,400
10,300
2,600
5,300
29,300
900
30,200
16,500
4,600
1,700
3,800
3,600
30,200
6,900
4,300
10,400
2,700
5,400
29,700
900
30,600
16,300
4,600
1,600
3,800
4,300
30,600
6,800
4,500
10,400
2,600
5,800
30,100
900
31,000
16,900
4,700
1,800
4,000
3,600
31,000
a number of pension schemes are operated around the world. the major schemes are of the defined benefit type with assets held in
separate trustee administered funds. the largest schemes, which cover the majority of employees, are in the UK, the Us and the
Netherlands. Under these plans, employees are entitled to retirement benefits dependent on the number of years service provided.
the principal assumptions for the purpose of valuation under ias19 – employee benefits are determined for each scheme in conjunction
with the respective schemes’ independent actuaries and are presented below as the weighted average of the various defined benefit
pension schemes. the defined benefit pension expense for each year is based on the assumptions and scheme valuations set at
31 december of the prior year.
discount rate
expected rate of return on scheme assets
expected rate of salary increases
inflation
future pension increases
2011
5.2%
6.2%
3.5%
2.9%
2.9%
as at 31 december
2010
5.6%
6.8%
4.1%
3.2%
3.2%
2009
5.8%
7.0%
4.0%
3.1%
3.1%
the expected rates of return on individual categories of scheme assets are determined by reference to relevant market indices and
market expectations of real rates of return. the overall expected rate of return on scheme assets is based on the weighted average
of each asset category.
mortality assumptions used in assessing defined benefit obligations make allowance for future improvements in longevity and have
been determined by reference to applicable mortality statistics and the actuaries’ expectations for each scheme. the average life
expectancies assumed in the valuation of the defined benefit obligations are set out below.
average liFe expectancy (at 31 december)
member currently aged 60
member currently aged 45
2011
2010
male
(years)
Female
(years)
male
(years)
female
(years)
88
89
87
88
88
89
87
88
o
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
f
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
98
Financial statements and other inFormation
Notes to the combiNed fiNaNcial statemeNts
Notes to the combined financial statements
for the year ended 31 december 2011
5 Pension schemes continued
the pension expense recognised within the income statement comprises:
service cost (including curtailment credits of £9m (2010: £17m))
interest on pension scheme liabilities
expected return on scheme assets
Net defined benefit pension expense
defined contribution pension expense
total pension expense
2011
£m
57
201
(235)
23
39
62
2010
£m
48
191
(217)
22
32
54
the amount recognised in the statement of financial position in respect of defined benefit pension schemes at the start and end of the
year and the movements during the year were as follows:
at start of year
service cost
interest on pension scheme liabilities
expected return on scheme assets
actuarial (loss)/gain
contributions by employer
contributions by employees
benefits paid
exchange translation differences
at end of year
2011
defined
benefit
obligations
£m
Fair value
of scheme
assets
£m
net
pension
obligations
£m
defined
benefit
obligations
£m
2010
fair value
of scheme
assets
£m
Net
pension
obligations
£m
(3,677)
(57)
(201)
–
(78)
–
(11)
141
7
(3,876)
3,507
–
–
235
(35)
66
11
(141)
(9)
3,634
(170)
(57)
(201)
235
(113)
66
–
–
(2)
(242)
(3,302)
(48)
(191)
–
(261)
–
(11)
139
(3)
(3,677)
3,067
–
–
217
198
154
11
(139)
(1)
3,507
(235)
(48)
(191)
217
(63)
154
–
–
(4)
(170)
the net pension obligations of £242m (2010: £170m) at 31 december 2011 comprise schemes in deficit with net pension obligations of
£242m (2010: £225m) and schemes in surplus with net pension assets of nil (2010: £55m).
as at 31 december 2011 the defined benefit obligations comprise £3,721m (2010: £3,531m) in relation to funded schemes and £155m
(2010: £146m) in relation to unfunded schemes. the weighted average duration of defined benefit scheme liabilities is 19 years (2010:
19 years). deferred tax liabilities of nil (2010: £15m) and deferred tax assets of £86m (2010: £78m) are recognised in respect of the
pension scheme surpluses and deficits respectively.
the fair value of scheme assets held as equities, bonds and other assets, and their expected rates of return as at 31 december, are
shown below:
equities
bonds
other
total
2011
2010
expected
rate of
return on
scheme
assets
8.7%
3.7%
4.3%
6.2%
Fair value
of scheme
assets
£m
proportion
of total
scheme
assets
1,699
1,722
213
3,634
47%
47%
6%
100%
expected
rate of
return on
scheme
assets
8.7%
4.4%
5.1%
6.8%
fair value
of scheme
assets
£m
Proportion
of total
scheme
assets
1,963
1,318
226
3,507
56%
38%
6%
100%
the actual return on scheme assets for the year ended 31 december 2011 was a £200m gain (2010: £415m gain).
reed elsevier annual Reports and financial statements 2011
99
5 Pension schemes continued
a summary of pension balances in respect of funded and unfunded schemes for the five years ended 31 december 2011 is set out below:
fair value of scheme assets
defined benefit obligations
net pension (obligations)/surplus
2011
£m
3,634
(3,876)
(242)
2010
£m
3,507
(3,677)
(170)
2009
£m
3,067
(3,302)
(235)
2008
£m
2,682
(3,051)
(369)
2007
£m
3,018
(2,968)
50
Gains and losses arising on the revaluation of pension scheme assets and liabilities that have been recognised in the statement of
comprehensive income are set out below:
Gains and losses arising during the year:
experience (losses)/gains on scheme liabilities
experience (losses)/gains on scheme assets
actuarial (losses)/gains arising on the present value of scheme liabilities
due to changes in:
– discount rates
– inflation
– life expectancy and other actuarial assumptions
Net cumulative (losses)/gains at start of year
Net cumulative (losses)/gains at end of year
2011
£m
(27)
(35)
(238)
182
5
(113)
(152)
(265)
2010
£m
(43)
198
(162)
(50)
(6)
(63)
(89)
(152)
2009
£m
18
301
(249)
(124)
60
6
(95)
(89)
2008
£m
(9)
(765)
202
198
27
(347)
252
(95)
2007
£m
(28)
34
367
(152)
3
224
28
252
Regular contributions to defined benefit pension schemes in respect of 2012 are expected to be approximately £60m.
sensitivity analysis
Valuation of Reed elsevier’s pension scheme liabilities involves judgements about uncertain events, including the life expectancy of the
members, salary and pension increases, inflation and the rate at which the future pension payments are discounted. estimates are used
for each of these factors, determined in conjunction with independent actuaries. differences arising from actual experience or future
changes in assumptions may materially affect future pension charges. in particular, changes in assumptions for discount rates,
inflation and life expectancies would have the following approximate effects on the annual net pension expense and the defined benefit
pension obligations:
increase/decrease of 0.25% in discount rate:
decrease/increase in annual net pension expense
decrease/increase in defined benefit pension obligations
increase/decrease of one year in assumed life expectancy:
increase/decrease in annual net pension expense
increase/decrease in defined benefit pension obligations
increase/decrease of 0.25% in the expected inflation rate:
increase/decrease in annual net pension expense
increase/decrease in defined benefit pension obligations
£m
3
168
5
94
7
144
additionally, the annual net pension expense includes an expected return on scheme assets. a 5% increase/decrease in the market
value of equity investments held by the defined benefit pension schemes would, absent any change in their expected long term rate of
return, increase/decrease the amount of the expected return on scheme assets by £7m and would decrease/increase the amount of the
net pension obligations by £85m.
o
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
f
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
100 Financial statements and other inFormation
Notes to the combiNed fiNaNcial statemeNts
Notes to the combined financial statements
for the year ended 31 december 2011
6 Share based remuneration
Reed elsevier provides a number of share based remuneration schemes to directors and employees. the principal share based
remuneration schemes are the executive share option schemes (esos), the long term incentive Plan (ltiP), the Reed elsevier Growth
Plan (ReGP), the Retention share Plan (RsP) and the bonus investment Plan (biP). share options granted under esos and ltiP are
exercisable after three years and up to ten years from the date of grant at a price equivalent to the market value of the respective shares
at the date of grant. conditional shares granted under esos, ltiP, RsP and biP are exercisable after three years for nil consideration
if conditions are met. conditional shares granted under ReGP are exercisable for nil consideration if conditions are met after three and
five years. other awards principally relate to all employee share based saving schemes in the UK and the Netherlands.
share based remuneration awards are, other than upon retirement or in exceptional circumstances, subject to the condition that the
employee remains in employment at the time of exercise. share options and conditional shares granted under ltiP, RsP and biP in 2009
and prior years are subject to the achievement of growth targets of Reed elsevier Plc and Reed elsevier NV adjusted earnings per share
measured at constant exchange rates. ltiP grants made in 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 are also variable subject to the achievement of an
additional total shareholder return performance target.
conditional shares granted under ltiP, ReGP, RsP and biP in 2010 and 2011 are subject to the achievement of growth targets of Reed
elsevier Plc and Reed elsevier NV adjusted earnings per share measured at constant exchange rates as well as the achievement of
a targeted percentage return on invested capital of Reed elsevier Plc and Reed elsevier NV. ltiP grants in 2010 and 2011 and ReGP
grants are also variable subject to the achievement of a total shareholder return performance target.
the weighted average fair value per award is based on full vesting on achievement of non market related performance conditions and
stochastic models for market related components. the conditional shares and option awards are recognised in the income statement
over the vesting period, being between three and five years, on the basis of expected performance against the non market related
conditions, with the fair value related to market related components unchanging. further details of performance conditions are given
in the directors’ Remuneration Report on pages 63 to 79.
2011 grants
share options
– esos
– other
total share options
conditional shares
– esos
– ltiP
– RsP
– biP
total conditional shares
2010 grants
share options
– esos
– other
total share options
conditional shares
– esos
– ltiP
– ReGP
– RsP
– biP
total conditional shares
in respect of
reed elsevier plc
ordinary shares
in respect of
reed elsevier nv
ordinary shares
Weighted
average fair
value per
award
£
Weighted
average fair
value per
award
£
number of
shares
’000
number of
shares
’000
2,053
633
2,686
755
1,822
322
1,339
4,238
0.98
1.03
0.99
4.85
4.56
4.73
5.43
4.90
1,372
381
1,753
504
1,217
5
607
2,333
1.41
0.97
1.32
6.91
6.65
7.15
8.00
7.06
in respect of
Reed elsevier Plc
ordinary shares
in respect of
Reed elsevier NV
ordinary shares
Weighted
average fair
value per
award
£
Weighted
average fair
value per
award
£
Number of
shares
’000
Number of
shares
’000
2,204
846
3,050
751
1,677
1,038
236
1,714
5,416
0.77
0.99
0.83
4.23
4.01
6.99
4.23
4.64
4.82
1,448
381
1,829
493
1,101
681
155
820
3,250
1.08
0.82
1.02
6.37
6.11
10.66
6.37
6.93
7.32
reed elsevier annual Reports and financial statements 2011
101
6 Share based remuneration continued
the main assumptions used to determine the fair values, which have been established with advice from and data provided by
independent actuaries, are set out below.
assumptions For grants made during the year
Weighted average share price at date of grant
– esos
– ltiP
– ReGP
– RsP
– biP
– other
expected share price volatility
expected option life
expected dividend yield
Risk free interest rate
expected lapse rate
in respect of
reed elsevier plc
ordinary shares
in respect of
reed elsevier nv
ordinary shares
2011
2010
2011
2010
£5.39
£5.31
£5.26
£5.43
£5.13
29%
4 years
3.6%
1.9%
2-5%
£4.69
£4.67
£4.67
£4.67
£4.64
£5.22
26%
4 years
3.5%
1.8%
3-5%
€8.97
€8.89
€9.27
€9.21
€9.03
29%
4 years
4.1%
2.5%
2-4%
€8.36
€8.31
€8.31
€8.33
€8.11
€8.86
26%
4 years
3.9%
1.2%
3-4%
expected share price volatility has been estimated based on relevant historic data in respect of the Reed elsevier Plc and Reed elsevier
NV ordinary share prices. expected share option life has been estimated based on historical exercise patterns in respect of Reed
elsevier Plc and Reed elsevier NV share options.
the share based remuneration awards outstanding as at 31 december 2011, in respect of both Reed elsevier Plc and Reed elsevier NV
ordinary shares, are set out below.
share options
outstanding at 1 January 2010
Granted
exercised
forfeited
expired
outstanding at 1 January 2011
Granted
exercised
forfeited
expired
outstanding at 31 december 2011
exercisable at 31 december 2010
exercisable at 31 december 2011
in respect of
reed elsevier plc
ordinary shares
in respect of
reed elsevier nv
ordinary shares
Weighted
average
exercise
price
(pence)
number of
shares
’000
Weighted
average
exercise
price
(€)
number of
shares
’000
35,685
3,050
(2,008)
(1,355)
(1,661)
33,711
2,686
(1,626)
(2,001)
(3,230)
29,540
22,048
20,061
547
455
470
496
554
544
509
493
479
640
534
552
552
25,917
1,829
(184)
(1,008)
(1,721)
24,833
1,753
(201)
(1,941)
(2,803)
21,641
18,735
16,876
11.74
8.45
8.63
8.75
6.71
11.45
8.99
8.84
10.94
8.68
10.99
11.88
11.56
o
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
f
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
102 Financial statements and other inFormation
Notes to the combiNed fiNaNcial statemeNts
Notes to the combined financial statements
for the year ended 31 december 2011
6 Share based remuneration continued
conditional shares
outstanding at 1 January 2010
Granted
Vested
forfeited
outstanding at 1 January 2011
Granted
Vested
forfeited
outstanding at 31 december 2011
in respect of
reed elsevier plc
ordinary shares
in respect of
reed elsevier nv
ordinary shares
number of shares
’000s
number of shares
’000s
8,148
5,416
(678)
(849)
12,037
4,238
(580)
(1,799)
13,896
4,921
3,250
(425)
(453)
7,293
2,332
(383)
(975)
8,267
the weighted average share price at the date of exercise of share options and vesting of conditional shares during 2011 was 554p (2010:
522p) for Reed elsevier Plc ordinary shares and €9.71 (2010: €8.82) for Reed elsevier NV ordinary shares.
range oF exercise prices For outstanding share options
2011
2010
reed elsevier plc ordinary shares (pence)
401-450
451-500
501-550
551-600
601-650
651-700
total
reed elsevier nv ordinary shares (euro)
7.01-8.00
8.01-9.00
9.01-10.00
10.01-11.00
11.01-12.00
12.01-13.00
13.01-14.00
14.01-15.00
15.01-16.00
total
Weighted
average
remaining
period until
expiry
(years)
number of
shares under
option
’000
Number of
shares under
option
’000
Weighted
average
remaining
period until
expiry
(years)
2,148
7,793
11,662
2,726
5,176
35
29,540
120
3,233
3,686
3,921
4,865
2,339
2,025
1,426
26
21,641
2.9
3.6
5.5
0.8
5.7
0.3
4.4
7.2
8.6
5.3
2.3
3.5
6.0
0.5
5.1
0.3
4.5
2,017
8,919
11,299
3,153
6,053
2,270
33,711
137
2,062
3,915
4,385
5,670
2,653
2,502
3,414
95
24,833
3.3
4.5
5.6
1.6
6.6
0.2
4.6
8.2
9.0
6.0
3.3
4.4
6.8
1.4
3.2
0.8
3.9
share options are expected, upon exercise, to be met principally by the issue of new ordinary shares but may also be met from shares
held by the Reed elsevier Group plc employee benefit trust (ebt) (see note 28). conditional shares will be met from shares held by
the ebt.
reed elsevier annual Reports and financial statements 2011
103
7 Net finance costs
interest on short term bank loans, overdrafts and commercial paper
interest on other loans
interest on obligations under finance leases
total borrowing costs
losses on loans and derivatives not designated as hedges
Finance costs
interest on bank deposits
Gains on loans and derivatives not designated as hedges
Finance income
net finance costs
2011
£m
(28)
(212)
(1)
(241)
(11)
(252)
12
5
17
(235)
2010
£m
(33)
(236)
(1)
(270)
(14)
(284)
7
1
8
(276)
finance costs include £15m (2010: £26m) transferred from the hedge reserve. a net loss of £3m (2010: £15m) on interest rate derivatives
designated as cash flow hedges was recognised directly in equity in the hedge reserve to be recognised in future periods.
8 Disposals and other non operating items
Revaluation of held for trading investments
loss on disposal of businesses
net loss on disposals and other non operating items
9 Taxation
current tax
United Kingdom
the Netherlands
Rest of world
total current tax charge
deferred tax
total taxation charge
the current tax charge includes a tax credit of nil (2010: £7m) in respect of prior year disposals.
2011
£m
6
(28)
(22)
2011
£m
64
87
107
258
(77)
181
2010
£m
8
(54)
(46)
2010
£m
44
58
64
166
(46)
120
o
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
f
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
104 Financial statements and other inFormation
Notes to the combiNed fiNaNcial statemeNts
Notes to the combined financial statements
for the year ended 31 december 2011
9 Taxation continued
a reconciliation of the notional tax charge based on average applicable rates of tax (weighted in proportion to accounting profits) to the
actual total tax expense is set out below.
Profit before tax
tax at average applicable rates
tax on share of results of joint ventures
Prior year credits on disposals
Non deductible loss on disposals
Net tax on share based remuneration
Non deductible amounts and other items
tax expense
tax expense as a percentage of profit before tax
the following tax has been recognised directly in equity during the year.
tax on actuarial movements on defined benefit pension schemes
tax on fair value movements on cash flow hedges
deferred tax credit on share based remuneration
net tax credit recognised directly in equity
10 Adjusted figures
2011
£m
948
180
(9)
–
4
3
3
181
19%
2011
£m
36
5
1
42
2010
£m
768
118
(7)
(7)
10
2
4
120
16%
2010
£m
16
12
1
29
Reed elsevier uses adjusted figures as additional performance measures. adjusted figures are stated before amortisation of acquired
intangible assets, exceptional restructuring (none in 2011) and acquisition related costs, disposal gains and losses and other non
operating items, related tax effects and movements in deferred taxation assets and liabilities that are not expected to crystallise in the
near term and include the benefit of tax amortisation where available on acquired goodwill and intangible assets. adjusted operating
profit is also grossed up to exclude the equity share of taxes in joint ventures. exceptional restructuring costs in 2010 related to the
restructuring of the Reed business information business. acquisition related costs relate to acquisition integration, professional and
other transaction related fees, and adjustments to deferred and contingent consideration.
adjusted operating cash flow is measured after net capital expenditure and dividends from joint ventures but before payments in
relation to exceptional restructuring and acquisition related costs. adjusted figures are derived as follows:
operating profit
adjustments:
amortisation of acquired intangible assets
exceptional restructuring costs
acquisition related costs
share of profit on disposals in joint ventures
Reclassification of tax in joint ventures
adjusted operating profit
Profit before tax
adjustments:
amortisation of acquired intangible assets
exceptional restructuring costs
acquisition related costs
Reclassification of tax in joint ventures
disposals and other non operating items
adjusted profit before tax
2011
£m
1,205
359
–
52
(1)
11
1,626
2010
£m
1,090
349
57
50
–
9
1,555
948
768
359
–
52
11
21
1,391
349
57
50
9
46
1,279
reed elsevier annual Reports and financial statements 2011
10 Adjusted figures continued
Profit attributable to parent companies’ shareholders
adjustments (post tax):
amortisation of acquired intangible assets
exceptional restructuring costs
acquisition related costs
disposals and other non operating items
deferred tax credits on acquired intangible assets not expected to crystallise in the near term
adjusted profit attributable to parent companies’ shareholders
cash generated from operations
dividends received from joint ventures
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
Proceeds from disposals of property, plant and equipment
expenditure on internally developed intangible assets
Payments in relation to exceptional restructuring costs
Payments in relation to acquisition related costs
adjusted operating cash flow
11 Statement of cash flows
reconciliation oF operating proFit beFore joint ventures to cash generated From operations
operating profit before joint ventures
amortisation of acquired intangible assets
amortisation of internally developed intangible assets
depreciation of property, plant and equipment
share based remuneration
total non cash items
decrease in inventories and pre-publication costs
(increase)/decrease in receivables
decrease in payables
(increase)/decrease in working capital
cash generated from operations
cash FloW on acquisitions
Purchase of businesses
investment in joint ventures
deferred payments relating to prior year acquisitions
total
o
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
f
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
105
2010
£m
642
337
37
30
37
(100)
983
1,649
24
(83)
7
(228)
99
51
1,519
2010
£m
1,068
345
158
79
(7)
575
35
24
(53)
6
1,649
2010
£m
(38)
–
(12)
(50)
2011
£m
760
355
–
33
16
(104)
1,060
1,735
33
(85)
7
(265)
52
38
1,515
2011
£m
1,175
355
132
75
27
589
32
(37)
(24)
(29)
1,735
2011
£m
(455)
(1)
(25)
(481)
Note
12
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
106 Financial statements and other inFormation
Notes to the combiNed fiNaNcial statemeNts
Notes to the combined financial statements
for the year ended 31 december 2011
11 Statement of cash flows continued
reconciliation oF net borroWings
cash & cash
equivalents
£m
borrowings
£m
related
derivative
financial
instruments
£m
2011
£m
2010
£m
at start of year
742
(4,302)
105
(3,455)
(3,931)
decrease in cash and cash equivalents
Net movement in short term bank loans, overdrafts and commercial paper
Repayment of other loans
Repayment of finance leases
change in net borrowings resulting from cash flows
borrowings in acquired businesses
inception of finance leases
fair value adjustments to borrowings and related derivatives
exchange translation differences
at end of year
(44)
–
–
–
(44)
–
–
–
28
726
–
(210)
248
22
60
(18)
(8)
(9)
(5)
(4,282)
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
17
1
123
(44)
(210)
248
22
16
(18)
(8)
8
24
(3,433)
–
143
394
7
544
–
(2)
11
(77)
(3,455)
Net borrowings comprise cash and cash equivalents, loan capital, finance leases, promissory notes, bank and other loans, and those
derivative financial instruments that are used to hedge the fair value of fixed rate borrowings.
cash and cash equivalents include £4m (2010: £4m) held in trust to satisfy liabilities in respect of change of control obligations related
to the acquisition of choicePoint.
12 Acquisitions
during the year a number of acquisitions were made for a total consideration of £492m (2010: £43m), after taking account of net cash
acquired of £24m, the most significant of which was the acquisition of accuity inc. for £331m, net of cash acquired, which completed on
1 November 2011. the net assets of the businesses acquired are incorporated at their fair value to the combined businesses. Provisional
fair values of the consideration given and of the assets and liabilities acquired are summarised below.
Goodwill
intangible assets
Property, plant & equipment
current assets
current liabilities
borrowings
current tax
deferred tax
net assets acquired
consideration (after taking account of £24m net cash acquired)
less: consideration deferred to future years
less: acquisition date fair value of equity interest
net cash flow
Fair
value
2011
£m
300
311
1
23
(46)
(18)
(1)
(78)
492
492
(27)
(10)
455
fair
value
2010
£m
27
27
–
–
(2)
–
–
(9)
43
43
(5)
–
38
Goodwill, being the excess of the consideration over the net tangible and intangible assets acquired, represents benefits which do not
qualify for recognition as intangible assets, including the ability of a business to generate higher returns than individual assets, skilled
workforces, acquisition synergies that are specific to Reed elsevier, and high barriers to market entry. in addition, goodwill arises on
the recognition of deferred tax liabilities in respect of intangible assets for which amortisation does not qualify for tax deductions.
reed elsevier annual Reports and financial statements 2011
107
12 Acquisitions continued
the fair values of the assets and liabilities acquired are provisional pending the completion of the valuation exercises. final fair values
will be incorporated in the 2012 combined financial statements. there were no significant adjustments to the provisional fair values of
prior year acquisitions established in 2010.
the businesses acquired in 2011 contributed £34m to revenue, increased adjusted operating profit by £8m, increased adjusted profit
attributable by £8m, decreased profit attributable by £10m, and contributed £7m to net cash inflow from operating activities for the part
year under Reed elsevier ownership and before taking account of acquisition financing costs. had the businesses been acquired at the
beginning of the year, on a pro forma basis the Reed elsevier revenues, adjusted operating profit, adjusted profit attributable and profit
attributable for the year would have been £6,065m, £1,643m, £1,071m and £771m respectively before taking account of acquisition
financing costs.
13 Equity dividends
ordinary dividends declared in the year
Reed elsevier Plc
Reed elsevier NV
total
2011
£m
248
251
499
2010
£m
245
240
485
ordinary dividends declared in the year, in amounts per ordinary share, comprise: a 2010 final dividend of 15.0p and a 2011 interim
dividend of 5.65p giving a total of 20.65p (2010: 20.4p) for Reed elsevier Plc; and a 2010 final dividend of €0.303 and a 2011 interim
dividend of €0.110 giving a total of €0.413 (2010: €0.402) for Reed elsevier NV.
the directors of Reed elsevier Plc have proposed a final dividend of 15.9p (2010: 15.0p). the directors of Reed elsevier NV have proposed
a final dividend of €0.326 (2010: €0.303). the total cost of funding the proposed final dividends is expected to be £390m, for which no
liability has been recognised at the statement of financial position date.
ordinary dividends paid and proposed relating to the Financial year
Reed elsevier Plc
Reed elsevier NV
total
2011
£m
259
265
524
2010
£m
245
246
491
dividends paid to Reed elsevier Plc and Reed elsevier NV shareholders are, other than in special circumstances, equalised at the gross
level inclusive of the UK tax credit of 10% received by certain Reed elsevier Plc shareholders. the cost of funding the Reed elsevier Plc
dividends is therefore similar to that of Reed elsevier NV.
14 Goodwill
at start of year
acquisitions
disposals/reclassified as held for sale
exchange translation differences
at end of year
2011
£m
4,441
300
(26)
14
4,729
2010
£m
4,339
27
(38)
113
4,441
the carrying amount of goodwill is after cumulative amortisation of £1,332m (2010: £1,407m) which was charged prior to the adoption
of ifRs and £49m (2010: £58m) of subsequent impairment charges.
o
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
f
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
108 Financial statements and other inFormation
Notes to the combiNed fiNaNcial statemeNts
Notes to the combined financial statements
for the year ended 31 december 2011
14 Goodwill continued
impairment review
impairment testing of goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets is performed at least annually based on cash generating units
(cGUs). a cGU is the smallest identifiable group of assets that generate cash inflows that are largely independent of the cash inflows
from other groups of assets. Goodwill impairment testing is performed on the basis of 24 cGUs. cGUs which are not individually
significant have been aggregated for presentation purposes. typically, when an acquisition is made the acquired business is fully
integrated into the relevant business unit and cGU, and the goodwill arising is allocated to the cGUs, or groups of cGUs, that are
expected to benefit from the synergies of the acquisition.
the carrying value of goodwill recorded in the major groups of cGUs is set out below.
goodWill
elsevier
lexisNexis Risk solutions
lexisNexis legal & Professional Us
lexisNexis legal & Professional international
lexisNexis legal & Professional
Reed exhibitions continental europe
Reed exhibitions other
Reed exhibitions
Reed business information Us
Reed business information UK
Reed business information Nl
Reed business information international
Reed business information
total
2011
£m
991
1,733
1,070
113
1,183
289
76
365
52
352
23
30
457
4,729
2010
£m
994
1,720
1,064
115
1,179
293
66
359
63
71
24
31
189
4,441
Reed elsevier’s goodwill impairment testing methodology, assumptions and sensitivity analysis are disclosed within critical judgements
and key sources of estimation uncertainty on pages 91 to 93.
reed elsevier annual Reports and financial statements 2011
15 Intangible assets
cost
at 1 January 2010
acquisitions
additions
disposals
exchange translation differences
at 1 January 2011
acquisitions
additions
disposals/reclassified as held for sale
exchange translation differences
at 31 december 2011
amortisation
at 1 January 2010
charge for the year
disposals
exchange translation differences
at 1 January 2011
charge for the year
disposals/reclassified as held for sale
exchange translation differences
at 31 december 2011
net book amount
at 31 december 2010
at 31 december 2011
109
total
£m
6,967
27
230
(176)
138
7,186
311
270
(278)
(2)
7,487
3,335
503
(157)
48
3,729
487
(215)
(8)
3,993
market and
customer
related
£m
content,
software
and other
£m
total
acquired
intangible
assets
£m
internally
developed
intangible
assets
£m
2,535
11
–
–
85
2,631
196
–
(38)
13
2,802
437
161
–
12
610
160
(30)
4
744
3,390
16
–
(99)
44
3,351
115
–
(189)
(14)
3,263
2,260
184
(93)
33
2,384
195
(149)
(8)
2,422
5,925
27
–
(99)
129
5,982
311
–
(227)
(1)
6,065
2,697
345
(93)
45
2,994
355
(179)
(4)
3,166
1,042
–
230
(77)
9
1,204
–
270
(51)
(1)
1,422
638
158
(64)
3
735
132
(36)
(4)
827
2,021
2,058
967
841
2,988
2,899
469
595
3,457
3,494
intangible assets acquired as part of business combinations comprise: market related assets (e.g. trademarks, imprints, brands);
customer related assets (e.g. subscription bases, customer lists, customer relationships); and content, software and other intangible
assets (e.g. editorial content, software and product delivery systems, other publishing rights, exhibition rights and supply contracts).
included in content, software and other acquired intangible assets are assets with a net book value of £531m (2010: £619m) that arose on
acquisitions completed prior to the adoption of ifRs that have not been allocated to specific categories of intangible assets. internally
developed intangible assets typically comprise software and systems development where an identifiable asset is created that is
probable to generate future economic benefits.
included in market and customer related intangible assets are £370m (2010: £368m) of brands and imprints relating to elsevier
determined to have indefinite lives based on an assessment of their historical longevity and stable market positions. indefinite lived
intangibles are tested for impairment at least annually using the same value in use assumptions as set out in critical judgements and
key sources of estimation uncertainty on pages 91 to 93.
o
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
f
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
110 Financial statements and other inFormation
Notes to the combiNed fiNaNcial statemeNts
Notes to the combined financial statements
for the year ended 31 december 2011
16 Investments
investments in joint ventures
available for sale investments
Venture capital investments held for trading
total
2011
£m
124
8
56
188
2010
£m
136
10
38
184
the value of venture capital investments held for trading, determined by reference to quoted market prices, amounted to £17m (2010:
£12m). the value of other venture capital investments and available for sale investments has been determined by reference to other
observable market inputs.
an analysis of changes in the carrying value of investments in joint ventures is set out below.
at start of year
share of results of joint ventures
dividends received from joint ventures
disposals
additions
exchange translation differences
at end of year
2011
£m
136
30
(33)
(6)
1
(4)
124
2010
£m
135
22
(24)
(1)
–
4
136
the principal joint ventures at 31 december 2011 are exhibition joint ventures within Reed exhibitions and Giuffrè (an italian legal
publisher in which Reed elsevier has a 40% shareholding) within lexisNexis legal & Professional.
summarised aggregate information in respect of joint ventures and Reed elsevier’s share is set out below.
Revenue
Net profit for the year
total assets
total liabilities
net assets
Goodwill
total
total joint ventures
reed elsevier share
2011
£m
254
62
255
(137)
118
2010
£m
235
46
264
(132)
132
2011
£m
128
30
122
(66)
56
68
124
2010
£m
116
22
122
(62)
60
76
136
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
17 Property, plant and equipment
Cost
At start of year
Acquisitions
Capital expenditure
Disposals/reclassified as held for sale
Exchange translation differences
At end of year
Accumulated depreciation
At start of year
Disposals/reclassified as held for sale
Charge for the year
Exchange translation differences
At end of year
2011
2010
Land and
buildings
Fixtures and
equipment
Total
£m
Land and
buildings
Fixtures and
equipment
246
–
8
(16)
–
238
115
(6)
9
–
118
578
1
82
(78)
(1)
582
418
(69)
66
(1)
414
824
1
90
(94)
(1)
820
533
(75)
75
(1)
532
238
–
7
(5)
6
246
106
(5)
12
2
115
626
–
78
(141)
15
578
466
(127)
67
12
418
111
Total
£m
864
–
85
(146)
21
824
572
(132)
79
14
533
Net book amount
120
168
288
131
160
291
No depreciation is provided on freehold land of £46m (2010: £48m). The net book amount of property, plant and equipment at
31 December 2011 includes £4m (2010: £2m) in respect of assets held under finance leases relating to fixtures and equipment.
18 Financial instruments
Details of the objectives, policies and strategies pursued by Reed Elsevier in relation to financial instruments and capital management
are set out on pages 46 and 47 of the Financial Review. The main financial risks faced by Reed Elsevier are liquidity risk, market risk –
comprising interest rate risk and foreign exchange risk – and credit risk. Financial instruments are used to finance the Reed Elsevier
businesses and to hedge interest rate and foreign exchange risks. Reed Elsevier’s businesses do not enter into speculative derivative
transactions. Details of financial instruments subject to liquidity, market and credit risks are described below.
Liquidity risk
Reed Elsevier maintains a range of borrowing facilities and debt programmes to fund its requirements, at short notice and at
competitive rates. The remaining contractual maturities for borrowings and derivative financial instruments are shown in the table
below. The table shows undiscounted principal and interest cash flows and includes contractual gross cash flows to be exchanged as
part of cross currency interest rate swaps and forward foreign exchange contracts where there is a legal right of set-off.
At 31 December 2011
Borrowings
Fixed rate borrowings
Floating rate borrowings
Derivative financial liabilities
Interest rate derivatives
Cross currency interest rate swaps
Forward foreign exchange contracts
Derivative financial assets
Interest rate derivatives
Cross currency interest rate swaps
Forward foreign exchange contracts
Total
Carrying
amount
£m
Within
1 year
£m
1-2 years
£m
2-3 years
£m
3-4 years
£m
4-5 years
£m
More than
5 years
£m
Total
£m
Contractual cash flow
(3,568)
(714)
(553)
(646)
(814)
(2)
(863)
(2)
(248)
(65)
(524)
(1)
(1,694)
(5)
(4,696)
(721)
(10)
–
(59)
(9)
(6)
(1,019)
39
99
11
(4,202)
13
14
987
(1,219)
(3)
(173)
(421)
27
208
414
(764)
–
(189)
(256)
6
248
252
(804)
–
–
–
5
–
–
(308)
–
–
–
–
–
–
(12)
(368)
(1,696)
5
–
–
(520)
3
–
–
(1,696)
59
470
1,653
(5,311)
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
112 FiNANCiAL sTATEMENTs AND oThER iNFoRMATioN
NOTES TO ThE COmBINED FINANCIAL STATEmENTS
Notes to the combined financial statements
for the year ended 31 December 2011
18 Financial instruments continued
At 31 December 2010
Borrowings
Fixed rate borrowings
Floating rate borrowings
Derivative financial liabilities
Interest rate derivatives
Cross currency interest rate swaps
Forward foreign exchange contracts
Derivative financial assets
Interest rate derivatives
Cross currency interest rate swaps
Forward foreign exchange contracts
Total
Carrying
amount
£m
(3,711)
(591)
Within
1 year
£m
(370)
(383)
(25)
–
(55)
(19)
(5)
(1,283)
19
100
15
(4,248)
15
14
1,262
(769)
Contractual cash flow
1-2 years
£m
2-3 years
£m
3-4 years
£m
4-5 years
£m
more than
5 years
£m
Total
£m
(558)
(53)
(8)
(7)
(413)
10
14
401
(614)
(833)
(6)
(2)
(179)
(154)
20
209
154
(791)
(865)
(99)
–
(190)
(32)
–
248
33
(905)
(246)
(67)
(2,210)
(5)
(5,082)
(613)
(1)
–
–
–
–
–
(314)
(6)
–
–
(36)
(381)
(1,882)
–
–
–
(2,221)
45
485
1,850
(5,614)
The carrying amount of derivative financial liabilities comprises £64m (2010: £68m) in relation to cash flow hedges and £5m (2010: £12m)
not designated as hedging instruments. The carrying amount of derivative financial assets comprises £123m (2010: £105m) in relation to
fair value hedges, £10m (2010: £12m) in relation to cash flow hedges and £16m (2010: £17m) not designated as hedging instruments.
At 31 December 2011, Reed Elsevier had access to a $2,000m committed bank facility maturing in June 2014, which was undrawn.
The bank facility, together with certain of Reed Elsevier’s private placements, are subject to financial covenants. Reed Elsevier was
in compliance with these covenants for the year ended 31 December 2011.
After taking account of the maturity of committed bank facilities that back short term borrowings at 31 December 2011, and after
utilising available cash resources, no borrowings mature within two years (2010: nil), 44% of borrowings mature in the third year (2010:
23%), 18% in the fourth and fifth years (2010: 27%), 27% in the sixth to tenth years (2010: 39%), and 11% beyond the tenth year (2010: 11%).
Market risk
Reed Elsevier’s primary market risks are to interest rate fluctuations and exchange rate movements. Derivatives are used to hedge or
reduce the risks of interest rate and exchange rate movements and are not entered into unless such risks exist. Derivatives used by
Reed Elsevier for hedging a particular risk are not specialised and are generally available from numerous sources. The impact of
market risks on net post employment benefit obligations and taxation is excluded from the following market risk sensitivity analysis.
Interest rate risk
Reed Elsevier’s interest rate exposure management policy is aimed at reducing the exposure of the combined businesses to changes
in interest rates.
At 31 December 2011, 69% of gross borrowings were either fixed rate or had been fixed through the use of interest rate swaps, forward
rate agreements and options. A 100 basis point reduction in interest rates would result in an estimated decrease in net finance costs of
£5m (2010: £3m), based on the composition of financial instruments including cash, cash equivalents, bank loans and commercial paper
borrowings at 31 December 2011. A 100 basis point rise in interest rates would result in an estimated increase in net finance costs of £5m
(2010: £3m).
The impact on net equity of a theoretical change in interest rates as at 31 December 2011 is restricted to the change in carrying value
of floating rate to fixed rate interest rate derivatives in a designated cash flow hedge relationship and undesignated interest rate
derivatives. A 100 basis point reduction in interest rates would result in an estimated reduction in net equity of £3m (2010: £8m) and a
100 basis point increase in interest rates would increase net equity by an estimated £4m (2010: £9m). The impact of a change in interest
rates on the carrying value of fixed rate borrowings in a designated fair value hedge relationship would be offset by the change in
carrying value of the related interest rate derivative. Fixed rate borrowings not in a designated hedging relationship are carried at
amortised cost.
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
113
18 Financial instruments continued
Foreign exchange rate risk
Translation exposures arise on the earnings and net assets of business operations in countries with currencies other than sterling, most
particularly in respect of the US businesses. These exposures are hedged, to a significant extent, by a policy of denominating borrowings
in currencies where significant translation exposures exist, most notably US dollars (see note 24).
A theoretical weakening of all currencies by 10% against sterling at 31 December 2011 would decrease the carrying value of net assets,
excluding net borrowings, by £472m (2010: £457m). This would be offset to a large degree by a decrease in net borrowings of £270m
(2010: £270m). A strengthening of all currencies by 10% against sterling at 31 December 2011 would increase the carrying value of net
assets, excluding net borrowings, by £590m (2010: £570m) and increase net borrowings by £330m (2010: £329m).
A retranslation of the combined businesses’ net profit for the year assuming a 10% weakening of all foreign currencies against sterling
but excluding transactional exposures would reduce net profit by £54m (2010: £51m). A 10% strengthening of all foreign currencies
against sterling on this basis would increase net profit for the year by £65m (2010: £62m).
Credit risk
Reed Elsevier seeks to limit interest rate and foreign exchange risks described above by the use of financial instruments and as a result
has a credit risk from the potential non performance by the counterparties to these financial instruments, which are unsecured. The
amount of this credit risk is normally restricted to the amounts of any hedge gain and not the principal amount being hedged. Reed
Elsevier also has a credit exposure to counterparties for the full principal amount of cash and cash equivalents. Credit risks are
controlled by monitoring the credit quality of these counterparties, principally licensed commercial banks and investment banks with
strong long term credit ratings, and the amounts outstanding with each of them.
Reed Elsevier has treasury policies in place which do not allow concentrations of risk with individual counterparties and do not allow
significant treasury exposures with counterparties which are rated lower than A/A2 by Standard & Poor’s, moody’s or Fitch.
Reed Elsevier also has credit risk with respect to trade receivables due from its customers that include national and state governments,
academic institutions and large and small enterprises including law firms, book stores and wholesalers. The concentration of credit
risk from trade receivables is limited due to the large and broad customer base. Trade receivable exposures are managed locally in the
business units where they arise. Where appropriate, business units seek to minimise this exposure by taking payment in advance and
through management of credit terms. Allowance is made for bad and doubtful debts based on management’s assessment of the risk
taking into account the ageing profile, experience and circumstance. The maximum exposure to credit risk is represented by the
carrying amount of each financial asset, including derivative financial instruments, recorded in the statement of financial position.
Included within trade receivables are the following amounts which are past due but for which no allowance has been made. Past due
up to one month £212m (2010: £241m); past due two to three months £54m (2010: £58m); past due four to six months £20m (2010: £16m);
and past due greater than six months £5m (2010: £5m). Examples of trade receivables which are past due but for which no allowance has
been made include those receivables where there is no concern over the creditworthiness of the customer and where the history of
dealings with the customer indicate the amount will be settled.
hedge accounting
The hedging relationships that are designated under IAS39 – Financial Instruments are described below:
Fair value hedges
Reed Elsevier has entered into interest rate swaps and cross currency interest rate swaps to hedge the exposure to changes in the fair
value of fixed rate borrowings due to interest rate and foreign currency movements which could affect the income statement.
Interest rate derivatives (including cross currency interest rate swaps) with a principal amount of £1,081m (2010: £1,093m) were in
place at 31 December 2011 swapping fixed rate term debt issues denominated in sterling, euros and Swiss francs (ChF) to floating rate
sterling, euro and US dollar (USD) debt respectively for the whole of their term.
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
114 FiNANCiAL sTATEMENTs AND oThER iNFoRMATioN
NOTES TO ThE COmBINED FINANCIAL STATEmENTS
Notes to the combined financial statements
for the year ended 31 December 2011
18 Financial instruments continued
The gains and losses on the borrowings and related derivatives designated as fair value hedges, which are included in the income
statement, for the two years ended 31 December 2011 were as follows:
GAiNs/(LossEs) oN BoRRoWiNGs
AND RELATED DERivATivEs
GBP debt
Related interest rate swaps
EUR debt
Related interest rate swaps
ChF debt
Related ChF to USD cross currency
interest rate swaps
Total GBP, EUR and ChF debt
Total related interest rate derivatives
Net gain
1 January
2010
£m
Fair value
movement
gain/(loss)
£m
Exchange
gain/(loss)
£m
1 January
2011
£m
Fair value
movement
gain/(loss)
£m
Exchange
gain/(loss)
£m
31 December
2011
£m
9
(9)
–
(2)
2
–
(48)
48
–
(41)
41
–
(16)
16
–
(10)
10
–
(37)
37
–
(63)
63
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
(1)
1
–
(1)
1
–
(7)
7
–
(12)
12
–
(86)
86
–
(105)
105
–
(23)
23
–
3
(3)
–
3
(3)
–
(17)
17
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
(1)
1
–
(1)
1
–
(30)
30
–
(9)
9
–
(84)
84
–
(123)
123
–
All fair value hedges were highly effective throughout the two years ended 31 December 2011.
Gross borrowings as at 31 December 2011 included £43m (2010: £51m) in relation to fair value adjustments to borrowings
previously designated in a fair value hedge relationship which were de-designated in 2008. The related derivatives were closed
out on de-designation with a cash inflow of £62m. £8m (2010: £10m) of these fair value adjustments were amortised in the year as
a reduction to finance costs.
Cash flow hedges
Reed Elsevier enters into two types of cash flow hedge:
(1)
Interest rate derivatives which fix the interest expense on a portion of forecast floating rate debt (including commercial paper, short
term bank loans and floating rate term debt).
(2) Foreign exchange derivatives which fix the exchange rate on a portion of future foreign currency subscription revenues forecast by
the Elsevier science and medical businesses for up to 50 months.
movements in the hedge reserve (pre-tax) in 2010 and 2011, including gains and losses on cash flow hedging instruments, were
as follows:
hedge reserve at 1 January 2010: losses deferred
Losses arising in 2010
Amounts recognised in income statement
Exchange translation differences
hedge reserve at 1 January 2011: losses deferred
Losses arising in 2011
Amounts recognised in income statement
Exchange translation differences
hedge reserve at 31 December 2011: losses deferred
interest rate
hedges
£m
Foreign
exchange
hedges
£m
Total hedge
reserve
pre-tax
£m
(38)
(15)
26
(2)
(29)
(3)
15
–
(17)
(51)
(43)
35
–
(59)
(21)
33
1
(46)
(89)
(58)
61
(2)
(88)
(24)
48
1
(63)
All cash flow hedges were highly effective throughout the two years ended 31 December 2011.
A tax credit of £15m (2010: £21m) in respect of the above gains and losses at 31 December 2011 was also deferred in the hedge reserve.
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
115
18 Financial instruments continued
Of the amounts recognised in the income statement in the year, losses of £33m (2010: £35m) were recognised in revenue, and losses of
£15m (2010: £26m) were recognised in finance costs. A tax credit of £11m (2010: £15m) was recognised in relation to these items.
The deferred losses on cash flow hedges at 31 December 2011 are currently expected to be recognised in the income statement in future
years as follows:
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Losses deferred in hedge reserve at end of year
interest rate
hedges
£m
Foreign
exchange
hedges
£m
Total hedge
reserve
pre-tax
£m
(13)
(4)
–
–
–
(17)
(14)
(19)
(10)
(3)
–
(46)
(27)
(23)
(10)
(3)
–
(63)
Dividends paid to Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV shareholders are, other than in special circumstances, equalised at the gross
level inclusive of the UK tax credit of 10% received by certain Reed Elsevier PLC shareholders. The cost of funding the Reed Elsevier PLC
dividends is therefore similar to that of Reed Elsevier NV.
19 Deferred tax
Deferred tax assets
Deferred tax liabilities
Total
2011
£m
212
(1,236)
(1,024)
2010
£m
151
(1,192)
(1,041)
movements in deferred tax liabilities and assets are summarised as follows:
Deferred tax liabilities
Deferred tax assets
Excess of tax
allowances
over
amortisation
£m
Acquired
intangible
assets
£m
Pensions
assets
£m
other
temporary
differences
£m
Excess of
amortisation
over tax
allowances
£m
Tax losses
carried
forward
£m
Pensions
liabilities
£m
other
temporary
differences
£m
Deferred tax (liability)/asset
at 1 January 2010
Credit/(charge) to profit
Credit/(charge) to equity
Transfers
Acquisitions
Exchange translation
differences
(216)
2
–
–
–
(1,007)
100
–
–
(9)
(9)
(28)
Deferred tax (liability)/asset
at 1 January 2011
(223)
(944)
(Charge)/credit to profit
Credit to equity
Transfers
Acquisitions
Disposals/reclassified
as held for sale
Exchange translation
differences
(6)
–
–
–
–
(2)
131
–
–
(85)
–
(2)
Deferred tax (liability)/asset
at 31 December 2011
(231)
(900)
(31)
(7)
23
–
–
–
(15)
(10)
25
–
–
–
–
–
(18)
1
7
–
–
–
(10)
(94)
–
–
–
1
(2)
27
(14)
–
–
–
–
13
3
–
–
–
–
–
(105)
16
9
4
–
–
–
–
13
32
–
–
2
–
1
48
122
(40)
(7)
–
–
3
78
(3)
11
–
–
–
–
86
Total
£m
(1,064)
46
29
(11)
(9)
50
–
6
(11)
–
2
(32)
47
24
6
(17)
5
(1)
(2)
(1,041)
77
42
(17)
(78)
–
(7)
62
(1,024)
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
116 FiNANCiAL sTATEMENTs AND oThER iNFoRMATioN
NOTES TO ThE COmBINED FINANCIAL STATEmENTS
Notes to the combined financial statements
for the year ended 31 December 2011
20 Inventories and pre-publication costs
Raw materials
Pre-publication costs
Finished goods
Total
21 Trade and other receivables
Trade receivables
Allowance for doubtful debts
Prepayments and accrued income
Total
2011
£m
6
115
69
190
2010
£m
6
130
92
228
2011
£m
1,361
(63)
1,298
185
1,483
2010
£m
1,361
(73)
1,288
187
1,475
Trade receivables are predominantly non-interest bearing and their carrying amounts approximate to their fair value.
Trade receivables are stated net of allowances for bad and doubtful debts. The movements in the provision during the year were
as follows:
At start of year
Charge for the year
Trade receivables written off
Disposals
Exchange translation differences
At end of year
22 Assets and liabilities held for sale
The major classes of assets and liabilities of operations classified as held for sale are as follows:
Goodwill
Intangible assets
Inventories
Deferred tax assets
Trade and other receivables
Total assets held for sale
Trade and other payables
Total liabilities associated with assets held for sale
2011
£m
73
15
(23)
(1)
(1)
63
2010
£m
80
15
(22)
–
–
73
2011
£m
2010
£m
19
7
1
1
16
44
17
17
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
117
23 Trade and other payables
Payables and accruals
Deferred income
Total
24 Borrowings
2011
£m
1,245
1,412
2,657
2010
£m
1,276
1,308
2,584
Financial liabilities measured at amortised cost:
Short term bank loans, overdrafts and commercial paper
Finance leases
Other loans
Other loans in fair value hedging relationships
Other loans previously in fair value hedging relationships
Total
2011
Falling due in
more than
1 year
£m
Falling due
within 1 year
£m
596
2
384
–
–
982
–
6
1,466
1,204
624
3,300
2010
Falling due
within 1
year
£m
Falling due in
more than
1 year
£m
379
7
130
–
–
516
–
15
1,944
1,198
629
3,786
Total
£m
596
8
1,850
1,204
624
4,282
Total
£m
379
22
2,074
1,198
629
4,302
The total fair value of financial liabilities measured at amortised cost is £2,745m (2010: £2,796m). The total fair value of other loans in fair
value hedging relationships is £1,237m (2010: £1,279m). The total fair value of other loans previously in fair value hedging relationships is
£707m (2010: £685m).
Analysis by year of repayment
2011
2010
short term
bank loans,
overdrafts
and
commercial
paper
£m
other loans
£m
Finance
leases
£m
596
–
–
–
–
–
–
596
384
618
725
188
401
1,362
3,294
3,678
2
3
2
1
–
–
6
8
Short term
bank loans,
overdrafts
and
commercial
paper
£m
Other loans
£m
Finance
leases
£m
379
–
–
–
–
–
–
379
130
382
636
825
188
1,740
3,771
3,901
7
7
8
–
–
–
15
22
Total
£m
982
621
727
189
401
1,362
3,300
4,282
Total
£m
516
389
644
825
188
1,740
3,786
4,302
Within 1 year
Within 1 to 2 years
Within 2 to 3 years
Within 3 to 4 years
Within 4 to 5 years
After 5 years
Total
Short term bank loans, overdrafts and commercial paper were backed up at 31 December 2011 by a $2,000m (£1,290m) committed bank
facility maturing in June 2014, which was undrawn.
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
118 FiNANCiAL sTATEMENTs AND oThER iNFoRMATioN
NOTES TO ThE COmBINED FINANCIAL STATEmENTS
Notes to the combined financial statements
for the year ended 31 December 2011
24 Borrowings continued
Analysis by currency
US dollars
£ sterling
Euro
Other currencies
Total
2011
2010
short term
bank loans,
overdrafts
and
commercial
paper
£m
other loans
£m
Finance
leases
£m
485
–
91
20
596
2,431
730
517
–
3,678
8
–
–
–
8
Short term
bank loans,
overdrafts
and
commercial
paper
£m
Other loans
£m
Finance
leases
£m
225
–
123
31
379
2,566
707
628
–
3,901
22
–
–
–
22
Total
£m
2,924
730
608
20
4,282
Total
£m
2,813
707
751
31
4,302
Included in the US dollar amounts for other loans above is £363m (2010: £364m) of debt denominated in Swiss francs (ChF 500m; 2010:
ChF 500m) that was swapped into US dollars on issuance and against which there are related derivative financial instruments, which, as
at 31 December 2011, had a fair value of £84m (2010: £86m).
25 Lease arrangements
Finance leases
At 31 December 2011 future finance lease obligations fall due as follows:
Within one year
In the second to fifth years inclusive
Less future finance charges
Total
Present value of future finance lease obligations payable:
Within one year
In the second to fifth years inclusive
Total
The fair value of the lease obligations approximates to their carrying amount.
2011
£m
2010
£m
2
6
8
–
8
2
6
8
8
17
25
(3)
22
7
15
22
operating leases
Reed Elsevier leases various properties, principally offices and warehouses, which have varying terms and renewal rights that are
typical to the territory in which they are located.
At 31 December 2011 outstanding commitments under non-cancellable operating leases fall due as follows:
Within one year
In the second to fifth years inclusive
After five years
Total
Of the above outstanding commitments, £605m (2010: £609m) relate to land and buildings.
2011
£m
129
305
206
640
2010
£m
128
306
208
642
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
119
25 Lease arrangements continued
Reed Elsevier has a number of properties that are sub-leased. The future lease receivables contracted with sub-tenants fall as follows:
Within one year
In the second to fifth years inclusive
After five years
Total
26 Provisions
At start of year
Charged
Utilised
Exchange translation differences
At end of year
2011
£m
21
38
19
78
2011
Property
£m
Restructuring
£m
105
16
(12)
–
109
54
–
(37)
–
17
Total
£m
159
16
(49)
–
126
2010
Property
£m
Restructuring
£m
89
36
(22)
2
105
106
31
(82)
(1)
54
Property provisions relate to estimated sub-lease shortfalls and guarantees given in respect of certain property leases for various
periods up to 2024.
At 31 December 2011 provisions are included within current and non-current liabilities as follows:
Current liabilities
Non-current liabilities
Total
27 Contingent liabilities and capital commitments
There are contingent liabilities amounting to £15m (2010: £18m) in respect of property lease guarantees.
2011
£m
39
87
126
2010
£m
17
25
5
47
Total
£m
195
67
(104)
1
159
2010
£m
71
88
159
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
120 FiNANCiAL sTATEMENTs AND oThER iNFoRMATioN
NOTES TO ThE COmBINED FINANCIAL STATEmENTS
Notes to the combined financial statements
for the year ended 31 December 2011
28 Combined share capitals, share premiums and shares held in treasury
Combined share capitals exclude the shares of Reed Elsevier NV held by a subsidiary of Reed Elsevier PLC. Disclosures in respect
of share capital are given in note 12 to the Reed Elsevier PLC consolidated financial statements and note 13 to the Reed Elsevier NV
consolidated financial statements.
Combined share premiums exclude the share premium in respect of shares of Reed Elsevier NV held by a subsidiary of Reed
Elsevier PLC.
At 31 December 2011, shares held in treasury related to 14,051,025 (2010: 14,654,161) Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shares and 7,380,906
(2010: 7,781,790) Reed Elsevier NV ordinary shares held by the Reed Elsevier Group plc Employee Benefit Trust (EBT); and 34,196,298
(2010: 34,196,298) Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shares and 23,952,791 (2010: 23,952,791) Reed Elsevier NV ordinary shares held by the
respective parent companies.
The EBT purchases Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV shares which, at the trustees’ discretion, can be used in respect of the
exercise of share options and to meet commitments under conditional share awards.
At 31 December 2011, shares held by the EBT were £159m (2010: £166m).
29 Other combined reserves
At start of year
Profit attributable to parent companies’ shareholders
Dividends paid
Actuarial losses on defined benefit pension schemes
Fair value movements on available for sale investments
Fair value movements on cash flow hedges
Tax recognised directly in equity
Increase/(decrease) in share based remuneration reserve
Settlement of share awards
Transfer from hedge reserve to net profit (net of tax)
Acquisition of non-controlling interests
Exchange translation differences
At end of year
hedge
reserve
2011
£m
other
reserves
2011
£m
(67)
–
–
–
–
(24)
5
–
–
37
–
1
(48)
(320)
760
(497)
(113)
(1)
–
37
27
(7)
–
(43)
6
(151)
Total
2011
£m
(387)
760
(497)
(113)
(1)
(24)
42
27
(7)
37
(43)
7
(199)
Total
2010
£m
(502)
642
(483)
(63)
–
(58)
29
(7)
(9)
46
–
18
(387)
Other reserves principally comprise retained earnings, the share based remuneration reserve and available for sale investment
reserve.
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
121
30 Related party transactions
Transactions between the Reed Elsevier combined businesses have been eliminated within the combined financial statements.
Transactions with joint ventures were made on normal market terms of trading and comprise sales of goods and services of
£1m (2010: £1m).
As at 31 December 2011, amounts owed by joint ventures were £3m (2010: £2m). Key management personnel are also related parties
and comprise the executive directors of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV. Transactions with key management personnel are set
out below.
Salaries and other short term employee benefits
Post employment benefits
Share based remuneration
Total
31 Exchange rates
The following exchange rates have been applied in preparing the combined financial statements:
2011
£m
3
–
4
7
2010
£m
5
1
(1)
5
Euro to sterling
US dollars to sterling
32 Approval of financial statements
income statement
statement of
financial position
2011
1.15
1.60
2010
1.17
1.55
2011
1.20
1.55
2010
1.17
1.56
The combined financial statements were approved and authorised for issue by the Boards of directors of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed
Elsevier NV on 15 February 2012.
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
122 FiNANCiAL sTATEMENTs AND oThER iNFoRMATioN
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT
Independent auditors’ report
to the members of Reed Elsevier PLC and shareholders of Reed Elsevier NV
The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgement,
including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement
of the combined financial statements, whether due to fraud or
error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers
internal control relevant to the entity’s preparation of the
combined financial statements in order to design audit procedures
that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose
of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s
internal control.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient
and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.
opinion on the combined financial statements
In our opinion the combined financial statements:
give a true and fair view of the state of the combined
businesses’ affairs as at 31 December 2011 and of its profit
for the year then ended; and
have been properly prepared in accordance with IFRSs as
adopted by the European Union.
other matter
We have also audited the information in the parts of the Directors’
Remuneration Report presented in the Reed Elsevier Annual
Reports and Financial Statements (“the Remuneration Report”)
that are described as having been audited. The separate audit
reports on the consolidated financial statements of Reed Elsevier
PLC and Reed Elsevier NV, which have been audited under locally
adopted standards and which include the other opinions required
by local laws and regulations, appear on pages 156 and 178.
Douglas King (Senior statutory auditor)
For and on behalf of
Deloitte LLP
Chartered Accountants
and Statutory Auditor
London, United Kingdom
15 February 2012
A Sandler
Deloitte Accountants B.v.
Amsterdam
The Netherlands
15 February 2012
Report on the combined financial statements
We have audited the combined financial statements of Reed
Elsevier PLC (registered in England and Wales), Reed Elsevier NV
(registered in Amsterdam), Reed Elsevier Group plc (registered
in England and Wales), Elsevier Reed Finance BV (registered in
Amsterdam) and their respective subsidiaries, associates and
joint ventures (together “the combined businesses”), for the year
ended 31 December 2011 (“the combined financial statements”),
which comprise the combined income statement, the combined
statement of comprehensive income, the combined statement
of cash flows, the combined statement of financial position, the
combined statement of changes in equity, the accounting policies
and the related notes 1 to 32 .
Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the
members of Reed Elsevier PLC and shareholders of Reed Elsevier
NV those matters we are required to state to them in an auditor’s
report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by
law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other
than Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV, and the members
of Reed Elsevier PLC as a body and the shareholders of Reed
Elsevier NV as a body, for our audit work, for this report, or for
the opinions we have formed.
Responsibilities of directors
As explained more fully in the Directors’ Responsibilities
Statement, the directors are responsible for the preparation of the
combined financial statements in accordance with International
Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union
(“IFRS”) and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view
and for such internal control as it determines is necessary to
enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from
material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
Auditors’ responsibilities
Our responsibility is to audit and express an opinion on the
combined financial statements in accordance with International
Standards on Auditing (UK and Ireland) as issued by the United
Kingdom Auditing Practices Board, and Dutch law, including the
Dutch Standards on Auditing. Those standards require us to
comply with our respective professions’ ethical requirements,
including Auditing Practices Board’s Ethical Standards for
Auditors and the International Ethical Standards Board of
Accountants Code of Ethics.
scope of the audit of the combined financial statements
An audit involves obtaining evidence about the amounts and
disclosures in the combined financial statements sufficient to give
reasonable assurance that the combined financial statements are
free from material misstatement, whether caused by fraud or
error. This includes an assessment of: whether the accounting
policies are appropriate to the combined businesses’
circumstances and have been consistently applied and adequately
disclosed; the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates
made by the directors; and the overall presentation of the
combined financial statements. In addition, we read all the
financial and non-financial information in the annual report to
identify material inconsistencies with the audited combined
financial statements. If we become aware of any apparent material
misstatements or inconsistencies we consider the implications
for our report.
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
123
Summary
combined
financial
information
in euros
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
In this section
124 Combined income statement
124 Combined statement of
comprehensive income
125 Combined statement of cash flows
126 Combined statement of
financial position
127 Combined statement of
changes in equity
128 Notes to the summary combined
financial information in euros
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
124 Financial statements and other information
COmBiNed FiNANCiAl StAtemeNtS iN euROS
Introduction
the Reed elsevier combined financial statements are presented in pounds sterling. this summary financial information presents the
primary combined financial statements and selected notes in euros using the exchange rates provided in note 31 to the combined
financial statements.
Combined income statement
Note
1
1
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER
Revenue
Cost of sales
Gross profit
Selling and distribution costs
Administration and other expenses
Operating profit before joint ventures
Share of results of joint ventures
Operating profit
Finance income
Finance costs
Net finance costs
disposals and other non operating items
Profit before tax
taxation
Net profit for the year
Attributable to:
Parent companies’ shareholders
Non-controlling interests
Net profit for the year
Combined statement of comprehensive income
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER
Net profit for the year
exchange differences on translation of foreign operations
Actuarial losses on defined benefit pension schemes
Fair value movements on available for sale investments
Fair value movements on cash flow hedges
transfer to net profit from hedge reserve (net of tax)
tax recognised directly in equity
Other comprehensive income for the year
Total comprehensive income for the year
Attributable to:
Parent companies’ shareholders
Non-controlling interests
Total comprehensive income for the year
2011
€m
6,902
(2,445)
4,457
(1,236)
(1,870)
1,351
35
1,386
20
(290)
(270)
(26)
1,090
(208)
882
874
8
882
2011
€m
882
107
(130)
(1)
(28)
43
48
39
921
913
8
921
2010
€m
7,084
(2,584)
4,500
(1,276)
(1,974)
1,250
25
1,275
9
(332)
(323)
(54)
898
(140)
758
751
7
758
2010
€m
758
196
(74)
–
(68)
54
34
142
900
893
7
900
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
Combined statement of cash flows
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER
Cash flows from operating activities
Cash generated from operations
interest paid
interest received
tax paid (net)
Net cash from operating activities
Cash flows from investing activities
Acquisitions
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
expenditure on internally developed intangible assets
Purchase of investments
Proceeds from disposals of property, plant and equipment
Net proceeds from other disposals
dividends received from joint ventures
Net cash used in investing activities
Cash flows from financing activities
dividends paid to shareholders of the parent companies
distributions to non-controlling interests
increase/(decrease) in short term bank loans, overdrafts and commercial paper
Repayment of other loans
Repayment of finance leases
Acquisition of non-controlling interests
Proceeds on issue of ordinary shares
Net cash used in financing activities
Note
4
4
125
2011
€m
2010
€m
1,995
(284)
14
(251)
1,474
(553)
(98)
(305)
(11)
8
92
38
(829)
(572)
(10)
241
(285)
(25)
(55)
10
(696)
1,929
(345)
9
(10)
1,583
(58)
(97)
(267)
(6)
8
7
28
(385)
(565)
(9)
(168)
(461)
(8)
–
13
(1,198)
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents
4
(51)
–
Movement in cash and cash equivalents
At start of year
decrease in cash and cash equivalents
exchange translation differences
At end of year
868
(51)
54
871
822
–
46
868
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
126 FINANCIAl sTATEMENTs AND OTHER INFORMATION
COmBiNed FiNANCiAl StAtemeNtS iN euROS
Combined statement of financial position
As AT 31 DECEMBER
Non-current assets
Goodwill
intangible assets
investments in joint ventures
Other investments
Property, plant and equipment
Net pension assets
deferred tax assets
Current assets
inventories and pre-publication costs
trade and other receivables
derivative financial instruments
Cash and cash equivalents
Assets held for sale
Total assets
Current liabilities
trade and other payables
derivative financial instruments
Borrowings
taxation
Provisions
Non-current liabilities
Borrowings
deferred tax liabilities
Net pension obligations
Provisions
liabilities associated with assets held for sale
Total liabilities
Net assets
Capital and reserves
Combined share capitals
Combined share premiums
Combined shares held in treasury
translation reserve
Other combined reserves
Combined shareholders’ equity
Non-controlling interests
Total equity
Note
2011
€m
2010
€m
5,675
4,192
149
77
346
–
254
10,693
228
1,780
179
871
3,058
53
13,804
3,188
83
1,178
813
47
5,309
3,960
1,483
290
105
5,838
21
11,168
2,636
5,196
4,045
159
56
341
64
177
10,038
267
1,725
157
868
3,017
–
13,055
3,023
94
604
755
83
4,559
4,430
1,395
263
103
6,191
–
10,750
2,305
268
3,268
(796)
297
(431)
2,606
30
2,636
262
3,222
(792)
229
(648)
2,273
32
2,305
2
4
5
6
5
2
6
7
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
Combined statement of changes in equity
Combined
share
capitals
€m
Combined
share
premiums
€m
Combined
shares held
in treasury
€m
Translation
reserve
€m
Other
combined
reserves
€m
Combined
share-
holders’
equity
€m
Non-
controlling
interests
€m
Balance at 1 January 2010
total comprehensive
income for the year
dividends paid
issue of ordinary shares,
net of expenses
decrease in share based
remuneration reserve
Settlement of share awards
exchange differences on
translation of capital
and reserves
Balance at 1 January 2011
total comprehensive
income for the year
dividends paid
issue of ordinary shares,
net of expenses
increase in share based
remuneration reserve
Settlement of share awards
Acquisitions
Acquisition of
non-controlling interests
exchange differences
on translation of
capital and reserves
Balance at 31 December 2011
252
3,144
(782)
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
13
–
–
–
–
–
–
11
10
262
65
3,222
(21)
(792)
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
10
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
8
–
–
79
196
–
–
–
–
(46)
229
107
–
–
–
–
–
–
(753)
1,940
697
(565)
–
(8)
(11)
893
(565)
13
(8)
–
(8)
–
(648)
2,273
806
(572)
913
(572)
–
31
(8)
–
10
31
–
–
30
7
(9)
–
–
–
4
32
8
(10)
–
–
–
6
(49)
(49)
(6)
(55)
6
268
36
3,268
(12)
(796)
(39)
297
9
(431)
–
2,606
–
30
–
2,636
127
Total
equity
€m
1,970
900
(574)
13
(8)
–
4
2,305
921
(582)
10
31
–
6
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
128 FINANCIAl sTATEMENTs AND OTHER INFORMATION
NOteS tO the SummARy COmBiNed FiNANCiAl iNFORmAtiON iN euROS
Notes to the summary combined financial information
in euros
1 Segment analysis
ANAlYsIs BY BusINEss sEgMENT
Revenue
Operating profit
Adjusted operating profit
elsevier
lexisNexis Risk Solutions
lexisNexis legal & Professional
Reed exhibitions
Reed Business information
Sub-total
Corporate costs
unallocated net pension financing credit
Total
2011
€m
2,367
1,044
1,879
813
799
6,902
–
–
6,902
2010
€m
2,370
1,085
1,978
811
840
7,084
–
–
7,084
2011
€m
799
208
166
152
78
1,403
(56)
39
1,386
2010
€m
757
193
186
149
–
1,285
(40)
30
1,275
2011
€m
883
416
263
192
127
1,881
(50)
39
1,870
2010
€m
847
414
279
185
104
1,829
(40)
30
1,819
Revenue is analysed before the €147m (2010: €136m) share of joint ventures’ revenue, of which €26m (2010: €28m) relates to lexisNexis
legal & Professional, principally to Giuffrè, €119m (2010: €104m) relates to Reed exhibitions and €2m (2010: €4m) relates to Reed
Business information.
Share of post-tax results of joint ventures of €35m (2010: €25m) included in operating profit comprises €5m (2010: €5m) relating to
lexisNexis legal & Professional, €29m (2010: €19m) relating to Reed exhibitions and €1m (2010: €1m) relating to Reed Business
information. the unallocated net pension credit of €39m (2010: €30m) comprises the expected return on pension scheme assets of
€270m (2010: €254m) less interest on pension scheme liabilities of €231m (2010: €224m).
ANAlYsIs OF REvENuE BY gEOgRAPHICAl ORIgIN
North America
united Kingdom
the Netherlands
Rest of europe
Rest of world
Total
ANAlYsIs OF REvENuE BY gEOgRAPHICAl MARkET
North America
united Kingdom
the Netherlands
Rest of europe
Rest of world
Total
ANAlYsIs OF REvENuE BY TYPE
Subscriptions
Circulation/transactions
Advertising
exhibitions
Other
Total
2011
€m
3,569
1,089
708
900
636
6,902
2011
€m
3,702
558
217
1,259
1,166
6,902
2011
€m
3,242
1,896
503
805
456
6,902
2010
€m
3,759
1,061
726
965
573
7,084
2010
€m
3,864
573
239
1,323
1,085
7,084
2010
€m
3,170
2,059
574
790
491
7,084
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
129
1 Segment analysis continued
ANAlYsIs BY BusINEss sEgMENT
elsevier
lexisNexis Risk Solutions
lexisNexis legal & Professional
Reed exhibitions
Reed Business information
Total
Expenditure on
acquired goodwill and
intangible assets
Capital
expenditure
additions
Amortisation
of acquired
intangible assets
Depreciation and
other amortisation
2011
€m
50
–
–
41
612
703
2010
€m
15
–
41
7
1
64
2011
€m
108
27
234
25
20
414
2010
€m
95
36
210
14
14
369
2011
€m
83
179
90
28
33
413
2010
€m
88
174
84
27
35
408
2011
€m
80
29
100
12
17
238
2010
€m
87
34
110
16
30
277
Capital expenditure comprises additions to property, plant and equipment and internally developed intangible assets. Amortisation of
acquired intangible assets includes amounts in respect of joint ventures of €5m (2010: €4m) in Reed exhibitions. Other than the
depreciation and amortisation above, non cash items include €31m charge (2010: €8m credit) relating to the recognition of share based
remuneration and comprise €6m charge (2010 €m: €2m credit) in elsevier, €4m charge (2010: €2m charge) in lexisNexis Risk
Solutions, €7m charge (2010: €1m credit) in lexisNexis legal & Professional; €3m charge (2010: €1m credit) in Reed exhibitions,
€2m charge (2010: €4m credit) in Reed Business information and €9m charge (2010: €2m credit) in Corporate.
ANAlYsIs OF NON-CuRRENT AssETs BY gEOgRAPHICAl lOCATION
North America
united Kingdom
the Netherlands
Rest of europe
Rest of world
Total
2011
€m
8,381
620
148
940
350
10,439
2010
€m
7,858
533
164
996
246
9,797
Non-current assets by geographical location exclude amounts relating to derivative financial instruments, deferred tax assets and net
pension assets.
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
130
FINANCIAl sTATEMENTs AND OTHER INFORMATION
NOteS tO the SummARy COmBiNed FiNANCiAl iNFORmAtiON iN euROS
Notes to the summary combined financial information
in euros
2 Pension schemes
the pension expense recognised within the income statement comprises:
Service cost (including curtailment credits of €10m (2010: €20m))
interest on pension scheme liabilities
expected return on scheme assets
Net defined benefit pension expense
defined contribution pension expense
Total pension expense
2011
€m
65
231
(270)
26
45
71
2010
€m
56
224
(254)
26
37
63
the amount recognised in the statement of financial position in respect of defined benefit pension schemes at the start and end of the
year and the movements during the year were as follows:
At start of year
Service cost
interest on pension scheme liabilities
expected return on scheme assets
Actuarial (loss)/gain
Contributions by employer
Contributions by employees
Benefits paid
exchange translation differences
At end of year
Defined
benefit
obligations
€m
2011
Fair value
of scheme
assets
€m
Net pension
obligations
€m
defined
benefit
obligations
€m
2010
Fair value
of scheme
assets
€m
Net pension
obligations
€m
(4,302)
(65)
(231)
–
(90)
–
(13)
162
(112)
(4,651)
4,103
–
–
270
(40)
76
13
(162)
101
4,361
(199)
(65)
(231)
270
(130)
76
–
–
(11)
(290)
(3,698)
(56)
(224)
–
(306)
–
(13)
163
(168)
(4,302)
3,435
–
–
254
232
180
13
(163)
152
4,103
(263)
(56)
(224)
254
(74)
180
–
–
(16)
(199)
the net pension obligations of €290m (2010: €199m) at 31 december 2011 comprise schemes in deficit with net pension obligations of
€290m (2010: €263m) and schemes in surplus with net pension assets of nil (2010: €64m).
As at 31 december 2011 the defined benefit obligations comprise €4,465m (2010: €4,131m) in relation to funded schemes and €186m
(2010: €171m) in relation to unfunded schemes.
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
131
3 Adjusted figures
Reed elsevier uses adjusted figures as additional performance measures. Adjusted figures are stated before amortisation of acquired
intangible assets, exceptional restructuring and acquisition related costs, disposal gains and losses and other non operating items,
related tax effects and movements in deferred taxation assets and liabilities that are not expected to crystallise in the near term and
includes the benefit of tax amortisation where available on acquired goodwill and intangible assets. Adjusted operating profit is also
grossed up to exclude the equity share of taxes in joint ventures. exceptional restructuring costs in 2010 relate to the restructuring of the
Reed Business information business. Acquisition related costs relate to acquisition integration and professional and other transaction
related fees and adjustments to deferred and contingent consideration.
Adjusted operating cash flow is measured after net capital expenditure and dividends from joint ventures but before payments in
relation to exceptional restructuring and acquisition related costs.
Operating profit
Adjustments:
Amortisation of acquired intangible assets
exceptional restructuring costs
Acquisition related costs
Share of profit on disposals in joint ventures
Reclassification of tax in joint ventures
Adjusted operating profit
Profit before tax
Adjustments:
Amortisation of acquired intangible assets
exceptional restructuring costs
Acquisition related costs
Reclassification of tax in joint ventures
disposals and other non operating items
Adjusted profit before tax
Profit attributable to parent companies’ shareholders
Adjustments (post tax):
Amortisation of acquired intangible assets
exceptional restructuring costs
Acquisition related costs
disposals and other non operating items
deferred tax credits on acquired intangible assets not expected to crystallise in the near term
Adjusted profit attributable to parent companies’ shareholders
Cash generated from operations
dividends received from joint ventures
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
Proceeds from disposals of property, plant and equipment
expenditure on internally developed intangible assets
Payments in relation to exceptional restructuring costs
Payments in relation to acquisition related costs
Adjusted operating cash flow
2011
€m
1,386
413
–
59
(1)
13
1,870
2010
€m
1,275
408
67
58
–
11
1,819
1,090
898
413
–
59
13
25
1,600
408
67
58
11
54
1,496
874
751
408
–
38
19
(120)
1,219
1,995
38
(98)
8
(305)
60
44
1,742
394
44
35
43
(117)
1,150
1,929
28
(97)
8
(267)
116
60
1,777
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
132
FINANCIAl sTATEMENTs AND OTHER INFORMATION
NOteS tO the SummARy COmBiNed FiNANCiAl iNFORmAtiON iN euROS
Notes to the summary combined financial information
in euros
4 Statement of cash flows
RECONCIlIATION OF OPERATINg PROFIT BEFORE jOINT vENTuREs TO CAsH gENERATED FROM OPERATIONs
Operating profit before joint ventures
Amortisation of acquired intangible assets
Amortisation of internally developed intangible assets
depreciation of property, plant and equipment
Share based remuneration
Total non cash items
decrease in inventories and pre-publication costs
decrease in receivables
decrease in payables
Decrease in working capital
Cash generated from operations
CAsH FlOw ON ACquIsITIONs
Purchase of businesses
investment in joint ventures
deferred payments relating to prior year acquisitions
Total
RECONCIlIATION OF NET BORROwINgs
2011
€m
1,351
408
152
86
31
677
37
(42)
(28)
(33)
1,995
2011
€m
(523)
(1)
(29)
(553)
2010
€m
1,250
404
185
92
(8)
673
40
28
(62)
6
1,929
2010
€m
(44)
–
(14)
(58)
Cash & cash
equivalents
€m
Borrowings
€m
Related
derivative
financial
instruments
€m
2011
€m
2010
€m
At start of year
868
(5,034)
123
(4,043)
(4,402)
increase in cash and cash equivalents
Net movement in short term bank loans, overdrafts and commercial paper
Repayment of other loans
Repayment of finance leases
Change in net borrowings resulting from cash flows
Borrowings in acquired businesses
inception of finance leases
Fair value adjustments to borrowings and related derivatives
exchange translation differences
At end of year
(51)
–
–
–
(51)
–
–
–
54
871
–
(241)
285
25
69
(21)
(9)
(11)
(132)
(5,138)
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
20
5
148
(51)
(241)
285
25
18
(21)
(9)
9
(73)
(4,119)
–
168
461
8
637
–
(2)
13
(289)
(4,043)
Net borrowings comprise cash and cash equivalents, loan capital, finance leases, promissory notes, bank and other loans, and those
derivative financial instruments that are used to hedge the fair value of fixed rate borrowings.
Cash and cash equivalents include €5m (2010: €5m) held in trust to satisfy liabilities in respect of change of control obligations related
to the acquisition of ChoicePoint.
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
133
5 Acquisitions
during the year a number of acquisitions were made for a total consideration of €566m (2010: €51m), after taking account of net cash
acquired of €28m, the most significant of which was the acquisition of Accuity inc. for €381m, net of cash acquired, which completed on
1 November 2011. the net assets of the businesses acquired are incorporated at their fair value to the combined businesses. Provisional
fair values of the consideration given and of the assets and liabilities acquired are summarised below.
Goodwill
intangible assets
Property, plant & equipment
Current assets
Current liabilities
Borrowings
Current tax
deferred tax
Net assets acquired
Consideration (after taking account of €28m net cash acquired)
less: consideration deferred to future years
less: acquisition date fair value of equity interest
Net cash flow
Fair
value
2011
€m
345
358
1
27
(53)
(21)
(1)
(90)
566
566
(31)
(12)
523
Fair
value
2010
€m
32
32
–
–
(2)
–
–
(11)
51
51
(6)
–
45
Goodwill, being the excess of the consideration over the net tangible and intangible assets acquired, represents benefits which do not
qualify for recognition as intangible assets, including the ability of a business to generate higher returns than individual assets, skilled
workforces, acquisition synergies that are specific to Reed elsevier, and high barriers to market entry. in addition, goodwill arises on the
recognition of deferred tax liabilities in respect of intangible assets for which amortisation does not qualify for tax deductions.
the fair values of the assets and liabilities acquired are provisional pending the completion of the valuation exercises. Final fair values
will be incorporated in the 2012 combined financial statements. there were no significant adjustments to the provisional fair values of
prior year acquisitions established in 2010.
the businesses acquired in 2011 contributed €39m to revenue, increased adjusted operating profit by €9m, increased adjusted profit
attributable by €9m, decreased profit attributable by €12m, and contributed €8m to net cash inflow from operating activities for the part
year under Reed elsevier ownership and before taking account of acquisition financing costs. had the businesses been acquired at the
beginning of the year, on a pro forma basis the Reed elsevier revenues, adjusted operating profit, adjusted profit attributable and profit
attributable for the year would have been €6,975m, €1,889m, €1,232m and €887m respectively before taking account of acquisition
financing costs.
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
134 FINANCIAl sTATEMENTs AND OTHER INFORMATION
NOteS tO the SummARy COmBiNed FiNANCiAl iNFORmAtiON iN euROS
Notes to the summary combined financial information
in euros
6 Borrowings
Financial liabilities measured at amortised cost:
Short term bank loans, overdrafts and commercial paper
Finance leases
Other loans
Other loans in fair value hedging relationships
Other loans previously in fair value hedging relationships
Total
2011
Falling due
within
1 year
€m
Falling due in
more than
1 year
€m
715
2
461
–
–
1,178
–
7
1,759
1,445
749
3,960
2010
Falling due
within
1 year
€m
Falling due in
more than
1 year
€m
444
8
152
–
–
604
–
18
2,274
1,402
736
4,430
Total
€m
715
9
2,220
1,445
749
5,138
total
€m
444
26
2,426
1,402
736
5,034
the total fair value of financial liabilities measured at amortised cost is €3,294m (2010: €3,271m). the total fair value of other loans in
fair value hedging relationships is €1,484m (2010: €1,496m). the total fair value of other loans previously in fair value hedging
relationships is €848m (2010: €801m).
Analysis by year of repayment
2011
2010
short term
bank loans,
overdrafts and
commercial
paper
€m
Other loans
€m
Finance
leases
€m
715
–
–
–
–
–
–
715
461
742
870
226
481
1,634
3,953
4,414
2
3
3
1
–
–
7
9
Short term
bank loans,
overdrafts and
commercial
paper
€m
Other loans
€m
Finance
leases
€m
444
–
–
–
–
–
–
444
152
447
744
965
220
2,036
4,412
4,564
8
8
10
–
–
–
18
26
Total
€m
1,178
745
873
227
481
1,634
3,960
5,138
total
€m
604
455
754
965
220
2,036
4,430
5,034
Within 1 year
Within 1 to 2 years
Within 2 to 3 years
Within 3 to 4 years
Within 4 to 5 years
After 5 years
Total
Short term bank loans, overdrafts and commercial paper were backed up at 31 december 2011 by a $2,000m (€1,548m) committed bank
facility maturing in June 2014, which was undrawn.
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
135
6 Borrowings continued
Analysis by currency
uS dollars
£ sterling
euro
Other currencies
Total
2011
2010
short term
bank loans,
overdrafts and
commercial
paper
€m
Other loans
€m
Finance
leases
€m
582
–
109
24
715
2,918
876
620
–
4,414
9
–
–
–
9
Short term
bank loans,
overdrafts and
commercial
paper
€m
Other loans
€m
Finance
leases
€m
263
–
144
37
444
3,002
827
735
–
4,564
26
–
–
–
26
Total
€m
3,509
876
729
24
5,138
total
€m
3,291
827
879
37
5,034
included in the uS dollar amounts for other loans above is €435m (2010: €425m) of debt denominated in Swiss francs (ChF 500m; 2010:
ChF 500m) that was swapped into uS dollars on issuance and against which there are related derivative financial instruments which, as
at 31 december 2011, had a fair value of €100m (2010: €100m).
7 Provisions
At start of year
Charged
utilised
exchange translation differences
At end of year
2011
Property
€m
Restructuring
€m
123
18
(14)
4
131
63
–
(42)
–
21
Total
€m
186
18
(56)
4
152
2010
Property
€m
Restructuring
€m
99
42
(26)
8
123
120
36
(96)
3
63
Property provisions relate to estimated sub-lease shortfalls and guarantees given in respect of certain property leases for various
periods up to 2024.
At 31 december 2011 provisions are included within current and non-current liabilities as follows:
Current liabilities
Non-current liabilities
Total
2011
€m
47
105
152
total
€m
219
78
(122)
11
186
2010
€m
83
103
186
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
136 FINANCIAl sTATEMENTs AND OTHER INFORMATION
NOteS tO the COmBiNed FiNANCiAl iNFORmAtiON iN euROS
Notes to the summary combined financial information
in euros
8 Other combined reserves
At start of year
Profit attributable to parent companies’ shareholders
dividends paid
Actuarial losses on defined benefit pension schemes
Fair value movements on cash flow hedges
Fair value movements on available for sale investments
tax recognised directly in equity
increase/(decrease) in share based remuneration reserve
Settlement of share awards
transfer from hedge reserve to net profit (net of tax)
Acquisition of non-controlling interests
exchange translation differences
At end of year
9 Exchange rates
Sterling to euro
uS dollars to euro
Hedge
reserve
2011
€m
Other
reserves
2011
€m
(79)
–
–
–
(28)
–
6
–
–
43
–
–
(58)
(569)
874
(572)
(130)
–
(1)
42
31
(8)
–
(49)
9
(373)
Total
2011
€m
(648)
874
(572)
(130)
(28)
(1)
48
31
(8)
43
(49)
9
(431)
total
2010
€m
(753)
751
(565)
(74)
(68)
–
34
(8)
(11)
54
–
(8)
(648)
Income statement
2011
0.87
1.39
2010
0.85
1.32
statement of
financial position
2011
0.83
1.29
2010
0.85
1.33
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
137
Reed Elsevier PLC
Annual Report and
Financial Statements
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
In this section
138 Directors’ report
144 Consolidated financial statements
148 Group accounting policies
149 Notes to the consolidated
financial statements
156 Independent auditor’s report on the
consolidated financial statements
157 Parent company financial statements
158 Notes to the parent company
financial statements
159 Independent auditor’s report on the
company financial statements
160 5 year summary
Company number: 77536
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
138 FInancIal statEmEnts and othER InFoRmatIon
ReeD elSevIeR PlC
Directors’ report
The directors present their report, together with the financial
statements of the group and company, for the year ended
31 December 2011.
As a consequence of the merger of the company’s businesses
with those of Reed elsevier Nv in 1993, described on page 55, the
shareholders of Reed elsevier PlC and Reed elsevier Nv can be
regarded as having the interests of a single economic group.
The Reed elsevier combined financial statements represent the
combined interests of both sets of shareholders and encompass
the businesses of Reed elsevier Group plc, elsevier Reed Finance
Bv and their respective subsidiaries, associates and joint
ventures, together with the parent companies, Reed elsevier PlC
and Reed elsevier Nv (“the combined businesses” or “Reed
elsevier”). This directors’ report and the financial statements of
the group and company should be read in conjunction with the
combined financial statements and other reports set out on pages
1 to 122. A review of the Reed elsevier combined businesses and
their performance in the year is set out on pages 8 to 28, a
summary of the principal risks facing Reed elsevier is set out on
pages 48 to 50, and the Reed elsevier statement on Corporate
Responsibility is set out on pages 29 to 38.
Principal activities
The company is a holding company and its principal investments
are its direct 50% shareholding in Reed elsevier Group plc and
39% shareholding in elsevier Reed Finance Bv, which are engaged
in publishing and information activities and financing activities
respectively. The remaining shareholdings in these two
companies are held by Reed elsevier Nv. Reed elsevier PlC also
has an indirect equity interest in Reed elsevier Nv. Reed elsevier
PlC and Reed elsevier Nv have retained their separate legal
identities and are publicly held companies. Reed elsevier PlC’s
securities are listed in london and New York and Reed elsevier
Nv’s securities are listed in Amsterdam and New York.
Financial statement presentation
The consolidated financial statements of Reed elsevier PlC
include the 52.9% economic interest that shareholders have under
the equalisation arrangements in the Reed elsevier combined
businesses, accounted for on an equity basis.
Under the terms of the merger agreement, dividends paid to Reed
elsevier PlC and Reed elsevier Nv shareholders are, other than in
special circumstances, equalised at the gross level inclusive of the
UK tax credit received by certain Reed elsevier PlC shareholders.
Because of the tax credit, Reed elsevier PlC normally requires
proportionately less cash to fund its net dividend than Reed
elsevier Nv does to fund its gross dividend. An adjustment is
therefore required in the consolidated income statement of Reed
elsevier PlC to share this tax benefit between the two sets of
shareholders in accordance with the equalisation agreement. The
equalisation adjustment arises on dividends paid by Reed elsevier
PlC to its shareholders and it reduced the consolidated attributable
earnings by £13m (2010: £13m), being 47.1% of the total amount of
the tax credit.
In addition to the reported figures, adjusted profit figures are
presented as additional performance measures used by
management. These exclude the tax credit equalisation
adjustment and, in relation to the results of joint ventures, the
company’s share of amortisation of acquired intangible assets,
acquisition related costs, disposal gains and losses and other non
operating items, related tax effects and movements in deferred
taxation assets and liabilities not expected to crystallise in the
near term and include the benefit of tax amortisation where
available on acquired goodwill and intangible assets.
consolidated income statement
Reed elsevier PlC’s shareholders’ 52.9% share of the adjusted
profit before tax of the Reed elsevier combined businesses was
£736m (2010: £677m). Reported profit before tax, including the
Reed elsevier PlC shareholders’ share of amortisation charges,
acquisition related costs and disposals and other non operating
items, was £390m (2010: £328m). The increase reflects the
improved trading performance, lower interest costs and no
exceptional restructuring costs in 2011.
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
139
At elsevier, Science & Technology reported good growth in
research and databases. Health Sciences underlying revenues
were flat, with double digit revenue growth in electronic revenue
across all segments offset by declines in print book sales to
individuals and in pharma promotion. lexisNexis Risk Solutions
achieved good growth in insurance data & analytics and business
services, although screening revenues slowed in the second half
reflecting US hiring trends, and federal government markets
remained under pressure. lexisNexis legal & Professional
revenues returned to slight underlying growth in both the US and
internationally, with growth in research and litigation tools and
in practice management, and moderating declines in news and
business to corporate customers and in electronic listings.
Reed exhibitions saw good growth across all geographies,
excluding biennial cycling. Reed Business Information returned
to underlying revenue growth, with strong growth in data services
mostly offset by continued weakness in print advertising. The
overall adjusted operating margin was 1.4 percentage points
higher despite additional spending on new product development
and sales & marketing, reflecting the sale and closure of low
returning assets and continued focus on process efficiency and
procurement savings, and the benefit of prior year restructuring
and currency effects.
Reed elsevier PlC’s shareholders’ share of the adjusted profit
attributable of the combined businesses was £561m (2010: £520m).
After deducting the company’s share of the post tax charge for
amortisation of acquired intangible assets, and acquisition related
costs, disposal gains and losses and other non operating items
and deferred taxes not expected to crystallise in the near term,
the reported net profit for the year was £389m (2010: £327m).
Adjusted earnings per share increased 8% to 46.7p (2010: 43.4p).
At constant rates of exchange, the adjusted earnings per share
were 6% higher. Including the effect of the tax credit equalisation
as well as amortisation of acquired intangible assets, acquisition
related costs, disposal gains and losses and other non operating
items, and tax adjustments, the basic earnings per share were
32.4p (2010: 27.3p).
consolidated statement of financial position
The consolidated statement of financial position of Reed elsevier
PlC reflects its 52.9% economic interest in the net assets of Reed
elsevier which as at 31 December 2011 was £1,149m (2010:
£1,028m). The £121m increase in net assets reflects the
company’s share in the attributable profits of Reed elsevier
partially offset by dividends paid.
dividends
The Board is recommending an equalised final dividend of
15.9p per ordinary share (2010: 15.0p). This gives total ordinary
dividends for the year of 21.55p (2010: 20.4p). The final dividend
will be paid on 21 May 2012 to shareholders on the Register on
27 April 2012.
Dividend cover, based on adjusted earnings per share and the
total interim and proposed final dividends for the year, is 2.2 times.
The Boards of the company and Reed elsevier Nv have adopted
dividend policies in recent years in respect of their equalised
dividends that, subject to currency considerations, grow dividends
broadly in line with adjusted earnings per share whilst maintaining
dividend cover (being the number of times the annual dividend is
covered by the adjusted earnings per share) of at least 2.0 times
over the longer term.
The total dividend paid on the ordinary shares in the financial year
was £248m (2010: £245m).
Parent company financial statements
The individual parent company financial statements of Reed
elsevier PlC are presented on pages 157 to 159, and are prepared
under UK Generally Accepted Accounting Practice (UK GAAP).
Parent company shareholders’ funds as at 31 December 2011
were £3,163m (2010: £2,791m).
corporate Governance
The company has complied throughout the year with the
provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code issued in
May 2010 (the “UK Code”). The UK Code is publicly available at
www.frc.org.uk. Details of how the principles of the UK Code have
been applied and the directors’ statement on internal control are
set out in the Structure and Corporate Governance report on
pages 55 to 61.
Details of the role and responsibilities, membership and activities
of the Reed elsevier Audit Committees, including the company’s
Audit Committee, are set out in the Report of the Audit Committees
on pages 80 to 82.
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
140 FInancIal statEmEnts and othER InFoRmatIon
ReeD elSevIeR PlC
Directors’ report
directors
The following served as directors of the company during the year:
A J Habgood (Chairman)
e engstrom (Chief executive Officer)
M H Armour (Chief Financial Officer)
M W elliott
A N Hennah (appointed 20 April 2011)
l Hook
R B Polet
Sir David Reid (senior independent director)
lord Sharman of Redlynch OBe (retired 20 April 2011)
B van der veer
Biographical details of the directors at the date of this report are
given on pages 52 and 53.
Directors are appointed in accordance with the Articles of
Association, which provides that any director appointed during
the year holds office only until the next following Annual General
Meeting and is then eligible for election by the shareholders.
The company’s Articles of Association provide that at every Annual
General Meeting of the company, one third of the directors (or if their
number is not a multiple of three the number nearest to one third)
shall retire from office and, if they wish, put themselves up for
re-election by the shareholders. The UK Code, applicable in respect
of the company’s financial year beginning 1 January 2011,
recommends that all directors should seek re-election by
shareholders annually. Accordingly, the Board implemented this
provision with effect from the Annual General Meeting in April 2011.
The office of director shall be vacated if he or she: (i) resigns; (ii)
becomes bankrupt or compounds with his or her creditors
generally; (iii) is or may be suffering from a mental illness; (iv) is
prohibited by law from being a director; or (v) is removed from
office pursuant to the company’s Articles of Association. Subject
to the shareholders’ rights to appoint individuals to the Board in
accordance with the company’s Articles of Association, no
individual may be appointed to the Board unless such appointment
is recommended by the Nominations Committee.
At the Annual General Meeting held in April 2011, Adrian Hennah
was appointed a non-executive director and lord Sharman retired
as a non-executive director.
In accordance with the provisions of the UK Code, all directors will
retire from the Board at the Annual General Meeting in 2012 and,
being eligible, they will each offer themselves for re-election.
Taking into account the assessment by the Corporate Governance
Committee of the qualifications, performance and effectiveness of
each individual director seeking re-election, the Board has
accepted a recommendation from the Nominations Committee
that each director be proposed for re-election at the 2012 Annual
General Meeting.
The Board, in conjunction with external recruitment consultants,
has been conducting a search for a suitable candidate as a
non-executive director and, on the recommendation of the
Nominations Committee. David Brennan will be proposed for
appointment as a non-executive director of Reed elsevier PlC
and as a member of the Supervisory Board of Reed elsevier Nv, with
effect from 1 November 2012 at the Reed elsevier PlC and Reed
elsevier Nv Annual General Meetings in April 2012. Mr Brennan was
appointed chief executive officer of AstraZeneca PlC in 2006. He
has over 35 years experience in the biopharmaceutical industry and
in the development, manufacturing and commercialisation of
innovative medicines. Mr Brennan will bring highly relevant
experience to our board discussions. Subject to his appointment at
the Annual General Meetings, he will also be appointed a
non-executive director of Reed elsevier Group plc.
The notice period applicable to the service contracts of
e engstrom and M H Armour is 12 months. The remaining
directors seeking re-election at the 2012 Annual General
Meeting do not have service contracts.
Details of directors’ remuneration and their interests in the share
capital of the company are provided in the Directors’
Remuneration Report on pages 63 to 79.
share capital
The company’s issued share capital comprises a single class of
ordinary shares, all of which are listed on the london Stock
exchange. All issued shares are fully paid up and carry no
additional obligations or special rights. each share carries the
right to one vote at general meetings of the company. In a general
meeting, subject to any rights and restrictions attached to any
shares, on a show of hands every member who is present in
person shall have one vote and every proxy present who has been
duly appointed by one or more members entitled to vote on the
resolution has one vote (although a proxy has one vote for and one
vote against the resolution if: (i) the proxy has been duly appointed
by more than one member entitled to vote on the resolution; and (ii)
the proxy has been instructed by one or more of those members to
vote for the resolution and by one or more other of those members
to vote against it). Subject to any rights or restrictions attached to
any shares, on a vote on a resolution on a poll every member
present in person or by proxy shall have one vote for every share of
which he is the holder. Proxy appointments and voting instructions
must be received by the company’s registrars not less than 48
hours before a general meeting. There are no specific restrictions
on the size of a holding nor on the transfer of shares, which are
both governed by the general provisions of the Articles of
Association and prevailing legislation. The company is not aware
of any agreements between shareholders that may result in
restrictions on the transfer of shares or on voting rights attached
to the shares.
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
141
At the 2011 Annual General Meeting, shareholders passed a
resolution authorising the directors to allot shares up to a nominal
value of £9m, representing less than 5% of the company’s issued
share capital. Since the 2011 Annual General Meeting no shares
have been issued under this authority. The shareholder authority
also permitted the directors to allot shares in order to satisfy
entitlements under employee share plans, and details of such
allotments are noted below. The authority to allot shares will
expire at the 2012 Annual General Meeting, and a resolution to
further extend the authority will be submitted to the shareholders
at the 2012 Annual General Meeting.
During the year, 1,627,341 ordinary shares in the company were
issued in order to satisfy entitlements under employee share
plans as follows:
337,841 under a UK SAYe share option scheme at prices
between 401.6p and 504.0p per share.
1,286,962 under executive share option schemes at prices
between 451.5p and 542.0p per share.
2,538 under lTIP scheme at 487.25p per share.
The issued share capital as at 31 December 2011 is shown in note
12 to the consolidated financial statements.
authority to purchase shares
At the 2011 Annual General Meeting, shareholders passed a
resolution authorising the purchase of up to 124.9 million ordinary
shares in the company (representing less than 10% of the issued
ordinary shares) by market purchase. No shares were purchased
under this authority during the year. As at 31 December 2011 there
were 34,196,298 ordinary shares held in treasury, representing
2.73% of the issued ordinary shares. The authority to make market
purchases will expire at the 2012 Annual General Meeting, and a
resolution to further extend the authority will be submitted to the
shareholders at the 2012 Annual General Meeting.
substantial share interests
As at 15 February 2012, the company had been notified by the
following shareholders that they held an interest of 3% or more in
voting rights of the issued share capital of the company:
lloyds Banking Group plc
BlackRock Inc.
Silchester International Investment
legal & General Group plc
6.90%
5.02%
3.99%
3.40%
The percentage interests stated above are as disclosed at the date
on which the interests were notified to the company.
Employee benefit trust
The Trustee of the Reed elsevier Group plc employee Benefit Trust
held an interest in 14,051,025 ordinary shares in the company
(representing 1.12% of the issued ordinary shares) as at 31
December 2011. The Trustee may vote or abstain from voting any
shares it holds in any way it sees fit.
significant agreements – change of control
The Governing Agreement between Reed elsevier PlC and Reed
elsevier Nv states that upon a change of control of Reed elsevier
PlC (for these purposes, the acquisition by a third party of 50% or
more of the issued share capital having voting rights), should there
not be a comparable offer from the offeror for Reed elsevier Nv,
Reed elsevier Nv may serve notice upon Reed elsevier PlC
varying certain provisions of the Governing Agreement, including
the governance and the standstill provisions.
There are a number of borrowing agreements including credit
facilities that in the event of a change of control of both Reed
elsevier PlC and Reed elsevier Nv and, in some cases, a
consequential credit rating downgrade to sub-investment grade
may, at the option of the lenders, require repayment and/or
cancellation as appropriate.
Powers of directors
Subject to the provisions of the Companies Act 2006, the
company’s Articles of Association and any directions given by
special resolutions, the business of the company shall be
managed by the Board which may exercise all the powers of the
company.
directors’ indemnity
In accordance with the company’s Articles of Association, the
company has granted directors an indemnity, to the extent
permitted by law, in respect of liabilities incurred as a result of
their office. The company also purchased and maintained
throughout the year Directors’ and Officers’ liability insurance in
respect of itself and its directors.
Related party transactions
Internal controls are in place to ensure that any related party
transactions involving directors or their connected persons are
carried out on an arm’s length basis and are properly recorded.
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
142
FInancIal statEmEnts and othER InFoRmatIon
ReeD elSevIeR PlC
Directors’ report
conflict of interest
The company’s Articles of Association permit the Board to approve
situations where a director has an interest that conflicts, or may
possibly conflict, with the interests of the company. The Board has
established a formal system whereby the Nominations Committee
considers and decides whether to authorise any such conflict or
potential conflict, and whether to impose limits or conditions when
giving authorisation. In reaching its decision, the Nominations
Committee is required to act in a way it considers would be most
likely to promote the success of the company.
creditor payment policy
Reed elsevier companies agree terms and conditions for business
transactions with suppliers, including the terms of payment. Reed
elsevier does not operate a standard code in respect of payments
to suppliers. The average time taken to pay suppliers during the
year was between 30 and 45 days (2010: between 30 and 45 days).
charitable donations
Through the Reed elsevier Cares programme, which concentrates
on education for disadvantaged young people, Reed elsevier
companies made donations during the year for charitable
purposes amounting to £2.4m (2010: £2.3m) of which £0.5m
(2010: £0.5m) was in the United Kingdom. Further information
concerning the Reed elsevier Cares programme is available
from the Reed elsevier Corporate Responsibility Report at
reporting.reedelsevier.com/cr11
Political donations
Reed elsevier does not make donations to eU political
organisations or incur eU political expenditure. In the United
States, Reed elsevier companies donated £53,550 (2010: £53,000)
to political organisations. In line with US law, these donations were
not made at federal level, but only to candidates and political
parties at the state and local levels.
Financial statements and accounting records
The directors are responsible for preparing the directors’ report
and the financial statements in accordance with applicable law
and regulations.
Company law requires the directors to prepare financial
statements for each financial year. Under that law the directors
are required to prepare the consolidated financial statements in
accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as
adopted by the european Union and Article 4 of the IAS Regulation
and have elected to prepare the parent company financial
statements in accordance with United Kingdom Generally
Accepted Accounting Practice (United Kingdom Accounting
Standards and applicable law). Under company law the directors
must not approve the accounts unless they are satisfied that they
give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the company and of
the profit or loss of the company for that period.
In preparing the parent company financial statements, the
directors are required to: select suitable accounting policies and
then apply them consistently; make judgments and accounting
estimates that are reasonable and prudent; state whether
applicable UK Accounting Standards have been followed, subject
to any material departures being disclosed and explained in the
financial statements; and prepare the financial statements on a
going concern basis unless it is inappropriate to presume that the
company will continue in business.
In preparing the group financial statements, IAS1 requires that
directors: properly select and apply accounting policies; present
information, including accounting policies, in a manner that
provides relevant, reliable, comparable and understandable
information; provide additional disclosures when compliance with
the specific requirements in IFRSs are insufficient to enable users
to understand the impact of particular transactions, other events
and conditions on the entity’s financial position and financial
performance; and make an assessment of the company’s ability to
continue as a going concern.
The directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting
records that are sufficient to show and explain the company’s
transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time
the financial position of the company and enable them to ensure
that the financial statements comply with the Companies Act 2006.
They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the
company and hence for taking reasonable steps for the prevention
and detection of fraud and other irregularities.
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
143
A commentary on the Reed elsevier combined businesses’
cash flows, financial position and liquidity for the year ended
31 December 2011 is set out in the Chief Financial Officer’s Report
on pages 42 to 44. This shows that, after taking account of
available cash resources and committed bank facilities that back
up short term borrowings, none of Reed elsevier’s borrowings fall
due within the next two years. Reed elsevier’s policies on liquidity,
capital management and management of risks relating to interest
rate, foreign exchange and credit exposures are set out on pages
46 and 47. Further information on liquidity of the combined
businesses can be found in note 18 of the combined financial
statements. The principal risks facing Reed elsevier are set out on
pages 48 to 50.
auditors
Resolutions for the re-appointment of Deloitte llP as auditors of
the company and to authorise the directors to fix their
remuneration will be submitted to shareholders at the 2012
Annual General Meeting.
By order of the Board
Registered Office
henry Udow
Secretary
15 February 2012
1-3 Strand
london
WC2N 5JR
directors’ responsibility statement
The Board confirms that to the best of its knowledge:
the consolidated financial statements, prepared in accordance
with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by
the International Accounting Standards Board and as adopted
by the european Union, give a true and fair view of the financial
position and profit or loss of the group; and
the directors’ report includes a fair review of the development
and performance of the business and the position of the group,
together with a description of the principal risks and
uncertainties that it faces.
Neither the company nor the directors accept any liability to any
person in relation to the Annual Report except to the extent that
such liability could arise under english law. Accordingly, any
liability to a person who has demonstrated reliance on any untrue
or misleading statement or omission shall be determined in
accordance with Section 90A of the Financial Services and
Markets Act 2000.
disclosure of information to auditors
As part of the process of approving the company’s 2011 financial
statements, the directors have taken steps pursuant to section
418(2) of the Companies Act 2006 to ensure that they are aware of
any relevant audit information and to establish that the company’s
auditors are aware of that information. In that context, so far as the
directors are aware, there is no relevant audit information of
which the company’s auditors are unaware.
Going concern
The directors, having made appropriate enquiries, consider that
adequate resources exist for the combined businesses to continue
in operational existence for the foreseeable future and that,
therefore, it is appropriate to adopt the going concern basis in
preparing the 2011 financial statements. In reaching this
conclusion, the directors have had due regard to the combined
businesses’ financial position as at 31 December 2011, the strong
free cash flow of the combined businesses, Reed elsevier’s
ability to access capital markets and the principal risks facing
Reed elsevier.
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
144 FInancIal statEmEnts and othER InFoRmatIon
ReeD elSevIeR PlC
Consolidated income statement
FoR thE YEaR EndEd 31 dEcEmBER
Administrative expenses
effect of tax credit equalisation on distributed earnings
Share of results of joint ventures
Operating profit
Finance income
Profit before tax
Taxation
Profit attributable to ordinary shareholders
Note
1
2
11
5
6
2011
£m
(2)
(13)
404
389
1
390
(1)
389
2010
£m
(2)
(13)
342
327
1
328
(1)
327
Consolidated statement of comprehensive income
FoR thE YEaR EndEd 31 dEcEmBER
Profit attributable to ordinary shareholders
Share of joint ventures’ other comprehensive (expense)/income for year
total comprehensive income for the year
2011
£m
389
(14)
375
2010
£m
327
25
352
Earnings per ordinary share
FoR thE YEaR EndEd 31 dEcEmBER
Basic earnings per share
Diluted earnings per share
Note
8
8
2011
pence
32.4
32.1
2010
pence
27.3
27.1
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
145
Consolidated statement of cash flows
FoR thE YEaR EndEd 31 dEcEmBER
cash flows from operating activities
Cash used by operations
Interest received
Tax paid
net cash used in operating activities
cash flows from investing activities
Dividends received from joint ventures
Increase in investment in joint ventures
net cash received from/(used in) investing activities
cash flows from financing activities
equity dividends paid
Proceeds on issue of ordinary shares
(Increase)/decrease in net funding balances due from joint ventures
net cash from financing activities
Note
10
11
11
7
10
2011
£m
2010
£m
(2)
1
(1)
(2)
600
–
600
(248)
8
(358)
(598)
(2)
1
(3)
(4)
589
(596)
(7)
(245)
9
247
11
movement in cash and cash equivalents
–
–
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
146 FInancIal statEmEnts and othER InFoRmatIon
ReeD elSevIeR PlC
Consolidated statement of financial position
as at 31 dEcEmBER
non-current assets
Investments in joint ventures
total assets
current liabilities
Taxation
total liabilities
net assets
capital and reserves
Called up share capital
Share premium account
Shares held in treasury (including in joint ventures)
Capital redemption reserve
Translation reserve
Other reserves
total equity
The consolidated financial statements were approved by the Board of directors, 15 February 2012.
a J habgood
Chairman
m h armour
Chief Financial Officer
Note
11
12
13
2011
£m
1,158
1,158
9
9
1,149
180
1,176
(308)
4
159
(62)
1,149
2010
£m
1,037
1,037
9
9
1,028
180
1,168
(312)
4
142
(154)
1,028
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
147
Consolidated statement of changes in equity
FoR thE YEaR EndEd 31 dEcEmBER
share
capital
£m
share
premium
£m
Note
shares
held in
treasury
£m
capital
redemption
reserve
£m
translation
reserve
£m
other
reserves
£m
total equity
£m
Balance at 1 January 2010
Total comprehensive income for the year
equity dividends paid
Issue of ordinary shares, net of expense
Share of joint ventures’ settlement of share
awards by employee benefit trust
Share of joint ventures’ decrease in
share based remuneration reserve
Balance at 1 January 2011
Total comprehensive income for the year
equity dividends paid
Issue of ordinary shares, net of expenses
Share of joint ventures’ settlement of share
awards by employee benefit trust
Share of joint ventures’ increase in share
based remuneration reserve
Share of joint ventures’ acquisition of
non-controlling interests
equalisation adjustments
Balance at 31 december 2011
7
7
180
–
–
–
–
–
180
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
180
1,159
–
–
9
–
–
1,168
–
–
8
–
–
–
–
1,176
(317)
–
–
–
5
–
(312)
–
–
–
4
–
–
–
(308)
4
–
–
–
–
–
4
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
4
92
50
–
–
–
–
142
17
–
–
–
–
–
–
159
(202)
302
(245)
–
(5)
(4)
(154)
358
(248)
–
(4)
14
(23)
(5)
(62)
916
352
(245)
9
–
(4)
1,028
375
(248)
8
–
14
(23)
(5)
1,149
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
148 FInancIal statEmEnts and othER InFoRmatIon
ReeD elSevIeR PlC
Group accounting policies
Basis of preparation
These consolidated financial statements have been prepared
under the historical cost convention in accordance with applicable
accounting standards. They report the consolidated statements of
income, cash flow and financial position of Reed elsevier PlC, and
have been prepared in accordance with International Financial
Reporting Standards (IFRS) as endorsed by the european Union
and as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board
(IASB).
The consolidated financial statements are prepared on a going
concern basis, as explained on page 143.
Unless otherwise indicated, all amounts shown in the financial
statements are in millions of pounds.
The basis of the merger of the businesses of Reed elsevier PlC
and Reed elsevier Nv is set out on page 55.
determination of profit
The Reed elsevier PlC share of the Reed elsevier combined
results has been calculated on the basis of the 52.9% economic
interest of the Reed elsevier PlC shareholders in the Reed
elsevier combined businesses, after taking account of results
arising in Reed elsevier PlC and its subsidiaries. Dividends paid
to Reed elsevier PlC and Reed elsevier Nv shareholders are,
other than in special circumstances, equalised at the gross level
inclusive of the UK tax credit received by certain Reed elsevier
PlC shareholders.
In Reed elsevier PlC’s consolidated financial statements, an
adjustment is required to equalise the benefit of the tax credit
between the two sets of shareholders in accordance with the
equalisation agreement. This equalisation adjustment arises
on dividends paid by Reed elsevier PlC to its shareholders and
reduces the consolidated attributable earnings by 47.1% of the
total amount of the tax credit.
The accounting policies adopted in the preparation of the
combined financial statements are set out on pages 88 to 93.
Investments
Reed elsevier PlC’s 52.9% economic interest in the net assets
of the combined businesses has been shown on the statement
of financial position as investments in joint ventures, net of the
assets and liabilities reported as part of Reed elsevier PlC and
its subsidiaries. Investments in joint ventures are accounted for
using the equity method.
Foreign exchange translation
Transactions in foreign currencies are recorded at the rate
of exchange prevailing on the date of the transaction. At each
statement of financial position date, monetary assets and
liabilities that are denominated in foreign currencies are
retranslated at the rate prevailing on the statement of financial
position date. exchange differences arising are recorded in the
income statement. The exchange gains or losses relating to the
retranslation of Reed elsevier PlC’s 52.9% economic interest
in the net assets of the combined businesses are classified as
equity and transferred to the translation reserve.
When foreign operations are disposed of, the related cumulative
translation differences are recognised within the income
statement in the period.
taxation
The tax expense represents the sum of the tax payable on the
current year taxable profits, adjustments in respect of prior
year taxable profits and the movements on deferred tax that are
recognised in the income statement. Tax arising in joint ventures
is included in the share of results of joint ventures.
The tax payable on current year taxable profits is calculated using
the applicable tax rate that has been enacted, or substantively
enacted, by the date of the statement of financial position.
Deferred tax is the tax arising on differences between the carrying
amounts of assets and liabilities in the financial statements and
their corresponding tax bases used in the computation of taxable
profit, and is accounted for using the balance sheet liability
method. Deferred tax liabilities are generally recognised for
all taxable temporary differences and deferred tax assets are
recognised to the extent that, based on current forecasts, it is
probable that taxable profits will be available against which
deductible temporary differences can be utilised.
Deferred tax is calculated using tax rates that have been
substantively enacted at the date of the statement of financial
position. Full provision is made for deferred tax which would
become payable on the distribution of retained profits from
foreign subsidiaries, associates or joint ventures.
Movements in deferred tax are charged and credited in the income
statement, except when they relate to items charged or credited
directly to equity, in which case the deferred tax is also recognised
in equity.
critical judgements and key sources of estimation uncertainty
Critical judgements in the preparation of the combined financial
statements are set out on pages 91 to 93.
standards, amendments and interpretations not yet effective
Recently issued standards, amendments and interpretations and
their impact on future accounting policies and reporting have been
considered on page 93 of the combined financial statements.
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
149
Notes to the consolidated financial statements
for the year ended 31 December 2011
1 Administrative expenses
Administrative expenses include £799,000 (2010: £742,000) paid in the year to Reed elsevier Group plc under a contract for the services
of directors and administrative support. Reed elsevier PlC has no employees (2010: nil).
2 Effect of tax credit equalisation on distributed earnings
The tax credit equalisation adjustment arises on ordinary dividends paid by Reed elsevier PlC to its shareholders and reduces the
consolidated profit attributable to ordinary shareholders by 47.1% of the total amount of the tax credit, as set out in the accounting
policies on page 148.
3 Auditor’s remuneration
Audit fees payable by Reed elsevier PlC were £28,000 (2010: £27,000). Further information on the audit and non audit fees paid by the
Reed elsevier combined businesses to Deloitte llP and its associates is set out in note 3 to the combined financial statements.
4 Related party transactions
All transactions with joint ventures, which are related parties of Reed elsevier PlC, are reflected in these financial statements. Key
management personnel are also related parties and comprise the executive directors of Reed elsevier PlC. Transactions with key
management personnel are set out in note 30 to the combined financial statements.
5 Finance income
Finance income from joint ventures
6 Taxation
UK corporation tax
2011
£m
1
2011
£m
1
A reconciliation of the notional tax charge based on the applicable rate of tax to the actual total tax expense is set out below.
Profit before tax
Tax at applicable rate 26.5% (2010: 28%)
Tax at applicable rate on share of results of joint ventures
Other
tax expense
2011
£m
390
103
(107)
5
1
2010
£m
1
2010
£m
1
2010
£m
328
92
(96)
5
1
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
150 FInancIal statEmEnts and othER InFoRmatIon
ReeD elSevIeR PlC
Notes to the consolidated financial statements
for the year ended 31 December 2011
7 Equity dividends
oRdInaRY dIvIdEnds dEclaREd In thE YEaR
Ordinary shares
Final for prior financial year
Interim for financial year
total
2011
pence
15.0p
5.65p
20.65p
2010
pence
15.0p
5.4p
20.4p
2011
£m
180
68
248
2010
£m
180
65
245
The directors of Reed elsevier PlC have proposed a final dividend of 15.9p (2010: 15.0p). The cost of funding the proposed final dividend is
expected to be £191m. No liability has been recognised at the statement of financial position date.
oRdInaRY dIvIdEnds PaId and PRoPosEd RElatInG to thE FInancIal YEaR
Ordinary shares
Interim (paid)
Final (proposed)
total
8 Earnings per ordinary share (“EPS”)
2011
pence
5.65p
15.9p
21.55p
2010
pence
5.4p
15.0p
20.4p
Basic earnings per share
Based on 52.9% interest in total operations
of the combined businesses
diluted earnings per share
2011
2010
Weighted
average
number of
shares
(millions)
1,202.0
1,202.0
1,211.7
Earnings
£m
389
402
389
EPs
£m
32.4
33.4
32.1
Weighted
average
number of
shares
(millions)
1,199.1
1,199.1
1,205.1
earnings
£m
327
340
327
ePS
£m
27.3
28.4
27.1
The diluted ePS figures are calculated after taking account of the effect of potential additional ordinary shares arising from share
options and conditional shares.
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
151
8 Earnings per ordinary share (“EPS”) continued
The weighted average number of shares is after deducting shares held in treasury. Movements in the number of shares in issue net of
treasury shares for the year ended 31 December 2011 are shown below.
nUmBER oF oRdInaRY shaREs
Year ended 31 december
At start of year
Issue of ordinary shares
Net release of shares by employee benefit trust
at end of year
Weighted average number of equivalent ordinary shares during the year
9 Adjusted figures
shares in
issue
(millions)
1,249.3
1.6
–
1,250.9
treasury
shares
(millions)
(48.9)
–
0.6
(48.3)
2011
shares in
issue net of
treasury
shares
(millions)
2010
Shares in
issue net of
treasury
shares
(millions)
1,200.4
1.6
0.6
1,202.6
1,202.0
1,197.7
2.0
0.7
1,200.4
1,199.1
Adjusted profit and earnings per share figures are used by management as additional performance measures. The adjusted figures are
derived as follows:
EaRnInGs PER shaRE
Reported figures
effect of tax credit equalisation on distributed earnings
Profit attributable to ordinary shareholders based on 52.9% economic
interest in the Reed elsevier combined businesses
Share of adjustments in joint ventures:
Amortisation of acquired intangible assets
exceptional restructuring costs
Acquisition related costs
Disposals and other non operating items
Deferred tax adjustments
adjusted figures
Profit attributable to
ordinary shareholders
Basic earnings
per share
2011
£m
389
13
402
188
–
17
8
(54)
561
2010
£m
327
13
340
178
20
15
20
(53)
520
2011
pence
32.4
1.0
2010
pence
27.3
1.1
33.4
28.4
15.6
–
1.5
0.7
(4.5)
46.7
14.8
1.7
1.2
1.7
(4.4)
43.4
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
152 FInancIal statEmEnts and othER InFoRmatIon
ReeD elSevIeR PlC
Notes to the consolidated financial statements
for the year ended 31 December 2011
10 Statement of cash flows
REconcIlIatIon oF admInIstRatIvE ExPEnsEs to cash UsEd BY oPERatIons
Administrative expenses
cash used by operations
REconcIlIatIon oF nEt FUndInG BalancEs dUE FRom JoInt vEntUREs
At start of year
Cash flow
at end of year
11 Investments in joint ventures
REconcIlIatIon oF nEt FUndInG BalancEs dUE FRom JoInt vEntUREs
Share of results of joint ventures
Share of joint ventures’ other comprehensive (expense) /income
Share of joint ventures’ acquisition of non-controlling interests
Share of joint ventures’ increase/(decrease) in share based remuneration reserve
equalisation adjustments
Dividends received from joint ventures
Increase in investment in joint ventures
Increase/(decrease) in net funding balances due from joint ventures
Net movement in the year
At start of year
at end of year
2011
£m
(2)
(2)
2011
£m
274
358
632
2011
£m
404
(14)
(23)
14
(18)
(600)
–
358
121
1,037
1,158
2010
£m
(2)
(2)
2010
£m
521
(247)
274
2010
£m
342
25
–
(4)
(13)
(589)
596
(247)
110
927
1,037
During the year the company received a dividend of £600m from Reed elsevier Group plc.
Summarised information showing total amounts in respect of joint ventures and Reed elsevier PlC shareholders’ 52.9% share is set
out below.
Revenue
net profit for the year
total joint ventures
2011
£m
6,002
767
2010
£m
6,055
648
Reed Elsevier Plc
shareholders’ share
2011
£m
3,175
404
2010
£m
3,203
342
Reed elsevier PlC’s share of joint ventures’ net profit attributable to parent company shareholders for the year excludes the net loss
that arose directly in Reed elsevier PlC of £2m (2010: £2m).
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
153
11 Investments in joint ventures continued
Total assets
Total liabilities
net assets
Attributable to:
Joint ventures
Non-controlling interests
Funding balances due from joint ventures
total
total joint ventures
Reed Elsevier Plc
shareholders’ share
2011
£m
11,503
(9,306)
2,197
2,172
25
2,197
2010
£m
11,158
(9,188)
1,970
1,943
27
1,970
2011
£m
6,085
(5,559)
526
526
–
526
632
1,158
2010
£m
5,903
(5,140)
763
763
–
763
274
1,037
The above amounts exclude assets and liabilities held directly by Reed elsevier PlC and include the counterparty balances of amounts
owed to and by other Reed elsevier businesses. Included within Reed elsevier PlC’s share of assets and liabilities are cash and cash
equivalents of £384m (2010: £393m) and borrowings of £2,265m (2010: £2,276m) respectively.
12 Share capital and shares held in treasury
aUthoRIsEd
Ordinary shares of 1451⁄116p each
Unclassified shares of 1451⁄116p each
total
no. of shares
1,250,913,565
788,785,984
All of the ordinary shares rank equally with respect to voting rights and rights to receive dividends. There are no restrictions on the
rights to transfer shares.
callEd UP shaRE caPItal – IssUEd and FUllY PaId
At start of year
Issue of ordinary shares
at end of year
no. of shares
1,249,286,224
1,627,341
1,250,913,565
2011
£m
180
–
180
No. of shares
1,247,275,833
2,010,391
1,249,286,224
£m
180
114
294
2010
£m
180
–
180
The issue of ordinary shares relates to the exercise of share options. Details of share option and conditional share schemes are set out in
note 6 to the Reed elsevier combined financial statements.
Details of shares held in treasury are provided in note 28 to the Reed elsevier combined financial statements.
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
154 FInancIal statEmEnts and othER InFoRmatIon
ReeD elSevIeR PlC
Notes to the consolidated financial statements
for the year ended 31 December 2011
13 Other reserves
At start of year
Profit attributable to ordinary shareholders
Share of joint ventures’:
Actuarial losses on defined benefit pension schemes
Fair value movements on available for sale investments
Fair value movements on cash flow hedges
Tax recognised directly in equity
Increase/(decrease) in share based remuneration reserve
Settlement of share awards by employee benefit trust
Acquisition of non-controlling interests
Transfer to net profit from hedge reserve
equalisation adjustments
equity dividends paid
at end of year
2011
£m
(154)
389
(60)
(1)
(12)
22
14
(4)
(23)
20
(5)
(248)
(62)
2010
£m
(202)
327
(33)
–
(31)
15
(4)
(5)
–
24
–
(245)
(154)
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
155
14 Contingent liabilities
There are contingent liabilities in respect of borrowings of joint ventures guaranteed by Reed elsevier PlC as follows:
Guaranteed jointly and severally with Reed Elsevier nv
2011
£m
3,920
2010
£m
3,924
Financial instruments disclosures in respect of the borrowings covered by the above guarantees are given in note 18 to the Reed elsevier
combined financial statements.
15 Principal joint ventures
Reed Elsevier Group plc
Incorporated and operating in Great Britain
1-3 Strand
london WC2N 5JR
Holding company for operating businesses involved in
science & medical, risk management, legal and business
publishing and organisation of trade exhibitions
Elsevier Reed Finance Bv
Incorporated in the Netherlands
Radarweg 29
1043 NX Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Holding company for financing businesses
18,385 ordinary R shares
18,385 ordinary e shares
100,000 7.5% cumulative preference non voting shares
equivalent to a 50% equity interest
133 ordinary R shares
205 ordinary e shares
equivalent to a 39% equity interest
The e shares in Reed elsevier Group plc and elsevier Reed Finance Bv are owned by Reed elsevier Nv.
16 Principal subsidiary
Reed holding Bv
Incorporated in the Netherlands
Radarweg 29
1043 NX Amsterdam, the Netherlands
191 ordinary shares
% holding
100%
–
100%
100%
–
% holding
100%
At 31 December 2011 Reed Holding Bv owned 4,303,179 (2010: 4,303,179) shares of a separate class in Reed elsevier Nv. The
equalisation arrangements entered into between Reed elsevier PlC and Reed elsevier Nv at the time of the merger give Reed
elsevier PlC a 5.8% economic interest in Reed elsevier Nv.
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
156 FInancIal statEmEnts and othER InFoRmatIon
ReeD elSevIeR PlC
Independent auditor’s report on the consolidated
financial statements to the members of Reed elsevier PlC
We have audited the consolidated financial statements of
Reed elsevier PlC for the year ended 31 December 2011 (“the
consolidated financial statements”), which comprise the
consolidated income statement, the consolidated statement of
comprehensive income, the consolidated statement of cash flows,
the consolidated statement of financial position, the consolidated
statement of changes in equity, the group accounting policies and
the related notes 1 to 16. The financial reporting framework that
has been applied in their preparation is applicable law and
International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRSs") as adopted
by the european Union.
This report is made solely to the company’s members, as a body,
in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the Companies Act 2006.
Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the
company’s members those matters we are required to state to
them in an auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest
extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility
to anyone other than the company and the company’s members as
a body, for our audit work, for this report, or for the opinions we
have formed.
Respective responsibilities of directors and auditor
As explained more fully in the Directors’ Responsibilities
Statement, the directors are responsible for the preparation
of the consolidated financial statements and for being satisfied
that they give a true and fair view.
Our responsibility is to audit and express an opinion on the
consolidated financial statements in accordance with applicable
law and International Standards on Auditing (UK and Ireland).
Those standards require us to comply with the Auditing Practices
Board’s ethical Standards for Auditors.
scope of the audit of the financial statements
An audit involves obtaining evidence about the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements sufficient to give
reasonable assurance that the financial statements are free
from material misstatement, whether caused by fraud or error.
This includes an assessment of: whether the accounting
policies are appropriate to the group’s circumstances and
have been consistently applied and adequately disclosed; the
reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by the
directors; and the overall presentation of the financial statements.
In addition, we read all the financial and non-financial information
in the annual report to identify material inconsistencies with the
audited financial statements. If we become aware of any apparent
material misstatements or inconsistencies we consider the
implications for our report.
opinion on financial statements
In our opinion the consolidated financial statements:
give a true and fair view of the state of the group’s affairs as
at 31 December 2011 and of its profit for the year then ended;
have been properly prepared in accordance with IFRSs as
adopted by the european Union; and
have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of
the Companies Act 2006 and Article 4 of the IAS Regulation.
opinion on other matter prescribed by the companies act 2006
In our opinion the information given in the Directors’ Report for the
financial year for which the financial statements are prepared is
consistent with the consolidated financial statements.
matters on which we are required to report by exception
We have nothing to report in respect of the following:
Under the Companies Act 2006 we are required to report to you if,
in our opinion:
certain disclosures of directors’ remuneration specified by law
are not made; or
we have not received all the information and explanations we
require for our audit.
Under the listing Rules we are required to review:
the directors’ statement, contained within the Structure and
Corporate Governance report, in relation to going concern;
the part of the Corporate Governance report relating to
the company’s compliance with the nine provisions of the
2008 Combined Code specified for our review; and
certain elements of the report to shareholders by the Board
on directors’ remuneration.
other matter
We have reported separately on the parent company financial
statements of Reed elsevier PlC for the year ended 31 December
2011 and on the information in the parts of the Directors’
Remuneration Report presented in the Reed elsevier Annual
Reports and Financial Statements 2011 that are described as
having been audited.
Douglas King (Senior statutory auditor)
For and on behalf of
deloitte llP
Chartered Accountants and Statutory Auditor
london
United Kingdom
15 February 2012
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
Parent company balance sheet
as at 31 dEcEmBER
Fixed assets
Investments in subsidiary undertakings
Investments in joint ventures
current assets
Debtors: amounts due from joint ventures
creditors: amounts falling due within one year
Other creditors
Taxation
Amounts owed to subsidiary undertakings
net current assets
net assets
capital and reserves
Called up share capital
Share premium account
Shares held in treasury
Capital redemption reserve
Other reserves
Profit and loss reserve
shareholders’ funds
Note
1
1
157
2010
£m
309
2,304
2,613
274
274
(10)
(9)
(77)
(96)
178
2,791
180
1,168
(224)
4
134
1,529
2,791
2011
£m
309
2,308
2,617
632
632
–
(9)
(77)
(86)
546
3,163
180
1,176
(224)
4
148
1,879
3,163
The parent company financial statements were approved by the Board of directors, 15 February 2012.
a J habgood
Chairman
m h armour
Chief Financial Officer
Parent company reconciliation of shareholders’ funds
At 1 January 2010
Profit attributable to ordinary shareholders
equity dividends paid
Issue of ordinary shares, net of expenses
equity instruments granted to employees
of combined businesses
At 1 January 2011
Profit attributable to ordinary shareholders
equity dividends paid
Issue of ordinary shares, net of expenses
equity instruments granted to employees
of combined businesses
at 31 december 2011
share
capital
£m
share
premium
account
£m
shares
held in
treasury
£m
capital
redemption
reserve
£m
other
reserves
£m
Profit
and loss
reserve
£m
180
–
–
–
–
180
–
–
–
–
180
1,159
–
–
9
–
1,168
–
–
8
–
1,176
(224)
–
–
–
–
(224)
–
–
–
–
(224)
4
–
–
–
–
4
–
–
–
–
4
138
–
–
–
(4)
134
–
–
–
14
148
1,187
587
(245)
–
–
1,529
598
(248)
–
–
1,879
total
£m
2,444
587
(245)
9
(4)
2,791
598
(248)
8
14
3,163
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
158 FInancIal statEmEnts and othER InFoRmatIon
ReeD elSevIeR PlC
Parent company accounting policies
Basis of preparation
The parent company financial statements have been prepared
under the historical cost convention in accordance with UK
Generally Accepted Accounting Practice (UK GAAP). Unless
otherwise indicated, all amounts in the financial statements are
in millions of pounds.
The parent company financial statements are prepared on a going
concern basis, as explained on page 143.
As permitted by section 408 of the Companies Act 2006, the
company has not presented its own profit and loss account.
The Reed elsevier PlC accounting policies under UK GAAP are
set out below.
Investments
Fixed asset investments in the Reed elsevier combined
businesses are stated at cost, less provision, if appropriate, for
any impairment in value. The fair value of the award of share
options and conditional shares over Reed elsevier PlC ordinary
shares to employees of the Reed elsevier combined businesses
are treated as a capital contribution.
Principal joint ventures and subsidiaries are set out in notes 15 and
16 of the Reed elsevier PlC consolidated financial statements.
shares held in treasury
The consideration paid, including directly attributable costs, for
shares repurchased is recognised as shares held in treasury and
presented as a deduction from total equity. Details of share capital
and shares held in treasury are set out in notes 12 of the Reed
elsevier PlC consolidated financial statements and note 28 of the
Reed elsevier combined financial statements.
Foreign exchange translation
Transactions entered into in foreign currencies are recorded at
the exchange rates applicable at the time of the transaction.
taxation
Deferred taxation is provided in full for timing differences using
the liability method. Deferred tax assets are only recognised to
the extent that they are considered recoverable in the short term.
Deferred taxation balances are not discounted.
Notes to the parent company financial statements
1 Investments
At 1 January 2010
Increase in investments
equity instruments granted to Reed elsevier employees
At 1 January 2011
equity instruments granted to Reed elsevier employees
at 31 december 2011
subsidiary
undertaking
£m
Joint
ventures
£m
309
–
–
309
–
309
1,702
596
6
2,304
4
2,308
total
£m
2,011
596
6
2,613
4
2,617
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
159
Independent auditor’s report on the parent company
financial statements to the members of Reed elsevier PlC
We have audited the parent company financial statements of Reed
elsevier PlC for the year ended 31 December 2011 (“the company
financial statements”) which comprise the parent company
balance sheet, the parent company reconciliation of shareholders’
funds, the parent company accounting policies and the related
note on page 158. The financial reporting framework that has been
applied in their preparation is applicable law and United Kingdom
Accounting Standards (United Kingdom Generally Accepted
Accounting Practice).
This report is made solely to the company’s members, as a body,
in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the Companies Act 2006.
Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the
company’s members those matters we are required to state to
them in an auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest
extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility
to anyone other than the company and the company’s members as
a body, for our audit work, for this report, or for the opinions we
have formed.
Respective responsibilities of directors and auditor
As explained more fully in the Directors’ Responsibilities
Statement the directors are responsible for the preparation of the
parent company financial statements and for being satisfied that
they give a true and fair view. Our responsibility is to audit and
express an opinion on the parent company financial statements in
accordance with applicable law and International Standards on
Auditing (UK and Ireland). Those standards require us to comply
with the Auditing Practices Board’s ethical Standards for Auditors.
scope of the audit of the financial statements
An audit involves obtaining evidence about the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements sufficient to give
reasonable assurance that the financial statements are free from
material misstatement, whether caused by fraud or error. This
includes an assessment of: whether the accounting policies are
appropriate to the parent company’s circumstances and have
been consistently applied and adequately disclosed; the
reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by the
directors; and the overall presentation of the financial statements.
In addition, we read all the financial and non-financial information
in the annual report to identify material inconsistencies with the
audited financial statements. If we become aware of any apparent
material misstatements or inconsistencies we consider the
implications for our report.
opinion on financial statements
In our opinion the parent company financial statements:
give a true and fair view of the state of the parent company’s
affairs as at 31 December 2011 and of its profit for the year
then ended;
have been properly prepared in accordance with United
Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice; and
have been prepared in accordance with the requirements
of the Companies Act 2006.
opinion on other matters prescribed by the companies act 2006
In our opinion:
the part of the Directors’ Remuneration Report to be audited
has been properly prepared in accordance with the Companies
Act 2006; and
the information given in the Directors’ Report for the financial
year for which the financial statements are prepared is
consistent with the parent company financial statements.
matters on which we are required to report by exception
We have nothing to report in respect of the following matters
where the Companies Act 2006 requires us to report to you if,
in our opinion:
adequate accounting records have not been kept by the parent
company, or returns adequate for our audit have not been
received from branches not visited by us; or
the parent company financial statements and the part of the
Directors’ Remuneration Report to be audited are not in
agreement with the accounting records and returns; or
certain disclosures of directors’ remuneration specified
by law are not made; or
we have not received all the information and explanations
we require for our audit.
other matter
We have reported separately on the consolidated financial
statements of Reed elsevier PlC for the year ended
31 December 2011.
Douglas King (Senior statutory auditor)
For and on behalf of
deloitte llP
Chartered Accountants and Statutory Auditor
london
United Kingdom
15 February 2012
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
160 FInancIal statEmEnts and othER InFoRmatIon
ReeD elSevIeR PlC
5 year summary
combined financial information
Revenue – continuing operations
Reported operating profit – continuing operations
Adjusted operating profit – continuing operations
Reported profit attributable to shareholders – total operations
Adjusted profit attributable to shareholders – total operations
Reed Elsevier Plc consolidated financial information
Reported profit attributable to shareholders
Adjusted profit attributable to shareholders
Reported earnings per ordinary share (pence)
Adjusted earnings per ordinary share (pence)
Dividend per ordinary share (pence)
Note
2
2
2
3
4
3
4
5
2011
£m
6,002
1,205
1,626
760
1,060
389
561
32.4p
46.7p
21.55p
2010
£m
6,055
1,090
1,555
642
983
327
520
27.3p
43.4p
20.4p
2009
£m
6,071
787
1,570
391
982
195
519
17.2p
45.9p
20.4p
2008
£m
5,334
901
1,379
476
919
241
486
22.1p
44.6p
20.3p
2007
£m
4,584
888
1,137
1,200
852
624
451
49.7p
35.9p
18.1p
(1) Adjusted figures are presented as additional performance measures used by management and are stated before amortisation and
impairment of acquired intangible assets and goodwill, exceptional restructuring and acquisition related costs, and in respect of
attributable profit, reflect a tax rate that excludes the effect of movements in deferred taxation assets and liabilities that are not
expected to crystallise in the near term and include the benefit of tax amortisation where available on acquired goodwill and
intangible assets. Acquisition related finance costs and profit and loss from disposal gains and losses and other non operating
items are also excluded from the adjusted figures.
(2) Revenue, reported operating profit and adjusted operating profit are presented for continuing operations. Net profit from
discontinued operations is included in profit attributable to shareholders.
(3) Reported profit attributable to shareholders and reported earnings per share are based on the 52.9% share of the Reed elsevier
combined profit attributable to shareholders, adjusted to equalise the benefit of the UK dividend tax credit with Reed elsevier Nv
shareholders as a reduction in reported profits.
(4) Adjusted profit attributable to shareholders and adjusted earnings per share are based on the 52.9% share of the Reed elsevier
combined profit attributable to Reed elsevier PlC shareholders.
(5) Dividend per ordinary share is based on the interim dividend and proposed final dividend for the relevant year, and does not include
the 82.0p per share special distribution in 2008.
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
161
Reed Elsevier NV
Annual Report and
Financial Statements
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
In this section
162 Report of the Supervisory Board and the
Executive Board
166 Consolidated financial statements
168 Group accounting policies
170 Notes to the consolidated financial
statements
178 Independent auditor’s report on the
consolidated financial statements
179 Parent company financial statements
180 Parent company accounting policies
181 Notes to the parent company financial
statements
182 Additional information
183 Independent auditor’s report on the
parent company financial statements
184 5 year summary
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
162 FInancIal statEmEnts and othER InFoRmatIon
REEd El SEvIER Nv
Report of the Supervisory Board and the Executive Board
The Supervisory Board and the Executive Board (which jointly
make up “the Combined Board”) present their joint report,
together with the financial statements of the group and of the
company, for the year ended 31 december 2011.
As a consequence of the merger of the company’s businesses
with those of Reed Elsevier PlC in 1993, described on page 55,
the shareholders of Reed Elsevier Nv and Reed Elsevier PlC can
be regarded as having the interests of a single economic group.
The Reed Elsevier combined financial statements represent the
combined interests of both sets of shareholders and encompass
the businesses of Reed Elsevier Group plc, Elsevier Reed Finance
Bv and their respective subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures,
together with the parent companies, Reed Elsevier Nv and Reed
Elsevier PlC (“the combined businesses” or “Reed Elsevier”).
This report of the Supervisory Board and the Executive Board and
the consolidated and parent company financial statements should
be read in conjunction with the Reed Elsevier combined financial
statements and other reports set out on pages 1 to 136, which are
incorporated by reference herein. Summary combined financial
information in euros is set out on pages 123 to 136. The combined
financial statements on pages 84 to 122 are to be considered as
part of the notes to the statutory financial statements. The annual
report of Reed Elsevier Nv within the meaning of article 2:391 of
the dutch Civil Code consists of pages 162 to 165 and, incorporated
by reference, pages 1 to 136. The Corporate Governance Statement
of Reed Elsevier Nv dated 15 February 2012 is published on the
Reed Elsevier website (www.reedelsevier.com) and is incorporated
by reference herein as per the vaststellingsbesluit nadere
voorschriften inhoud jaarverslag January 2010 article 2a
under 1 sub b.
Principal activities
The company is a holding company and its principal investments
are its direct 50% shareholding in Reed Elsevier Group plc and its
direct 61% shareholding in Elsevier Reed Finance Bv, which are
engaged in publishing and information activities and financing
activities respectively. The remaining shareholdings in these two
companies are held by Reed Elsevier PlC.
Reed Elsevier Nv and Reed Elsevier PlC have retained their
separate legal identities and are publicly held companies. Reed
Elsevier Nv’s securities are listed in Amsterdam and New York
and Reed Elsevier PlC’s securities are listed in london and
New York.
Financial statement presentation
The consolidated financial statements of Reed Elsevier Nv include
the 50% economic interest that its shareholders (including Reed
Elsevier PlC, which has an indirect 5.8% interest in the company)
have under the equalisation arrangements in the Reed Elsevier
combined businesses, accounted for on an equity basis.
Under the terms of the merger agreement, dividends paid to Reed
Elsevier Nv and Reed Elsevier PlC shareholders are, other than in
special circumstances, equalised at the gross level inclusive of the
UK tax credit received by certain Reed Elsevier PlC shareholders.
In addition to the reported figures, adjusted profit figures are
presented as additional performance measures used by
management. These exclude, in relation to the results of joint
ventures, the company’s share of amortisation of acquired
intangible assets, acquisition related costs, disposal gains and
losses and other non operating items, related tax effects and
movements in deferred taxation assets and liabilities not expected
to crystallise in the near term and include the benefit of tax
amortisation where available on acquired goodwill and
intangible assets.
consolidated income statement
Reed Elsevier Nv’s shareholders’ 50% share of the adjusted profit
before tax of the Reed Elsevier combined businesses was €800m
(2010: €748m). Reported profit before tax, including the Reed
Elsevier Nv shareholders’ share of amortisation, acquisition
related costs and disposals and non operating items, was €438m
(2010: €379m). The increase reflects the improved trading
performance, lower interest costs and no exceptional
restructuring costs in 2011.
At Elsevier, Science & Technology reported good growth in
research and databases. Health Sciences underlying revenues
were flat, with double digit revenue growth in electronic revenue
across all segments offset by declines in print book sales to
individuals and in pharma promotion. lexisNexis Risk Solutions
achieved good growth in insurance data & analytics and business
services, although screening revenues slowed in the second half
reflecting US hiring trends, and federal government markets
remained under pressure. lexisNexis legal & Professional
revenues returned to slight underlying growth in both the US and
internationally, with growth in research and litigation tools and
in practice management, and moderating declines in news and
business to corporate customers and in electronic listings.
Reed Exhibitions saw good growth across all geographies,
excluding biennial cycling. Reed Business Information returned
to underlying revenue growth, with strong growth in data services
mostly offset by continued weakness in print advertising. The
overall adjusted operating margin was 1.4 percentage points
higher despite additional spending on new product development
and sales & marketing, reflecting the sale and closure of low
returning assets and continued focus on process efficiency and
procurement savings, and the benefit of prior year restructuring
and currency effects.
Reed Elsevier Nv ’s shareholders’ share of the adjusted profit
attributable of the combined businesses was €610m (2010:
€575m). After deducting the company’s share of the post tax
charge for amortisation of acquired intangible assets, acquisition
related costs, disposal gains and losses and other non operating
items and deferred taxes not expected to crystallise in the near
term, the reported net profit for the year was €437m (2010: €376m).
Adjusted earnings per share increased 6% to €0.83 (2010: €0.78).
At constant rates of exchange, the adjusted earnings per share
were 6% higher. Including amortisation of acquired intangible
assets, acquisition related costs, disposal gains and losses and
other non operating items, and tax adjustments, the basic
earnings per share were €0.59 (2010: €0.51).
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
163
consolidated statement of financial position
The consolidated statement of financial position of Reed Elsevier
Nv reflects its 50% economic interest in the net assets of Reed
Elsevier which as at 31 december 2011 was €1,303m (2010:
€1,137m). The €166m increase in net assets reflects the
company’s share in the attributable profits of Reed Elsevier
partially offset by dividends paid.
Parent company financial statements
In accordance with article 2:362(1) of the dutch Civil Code, the
individual parent company financial statements of Reed Elsevier
Nv (presented on pages 179 to 183) are prepared under UK
generally accepted accounting practice (UK GAAP) The profit
attributable to the shareholders of Reed Elsevier Nv was €17m
(2010: €1,102m) and net assets as at 31 december 2011, principally
representing the investments in Reed Elsevier Group plc and
Elsevier Reed Finance Bv under the historical cost method and
loans to their subsidiaries, were €4,630m (2010: €4,884m). Free
reserves as at 31 december 2011 were €4,385m (2010: €4,655m),
comprising reserves and paid-in surplus less shares held in
treasury.
dividends
The Combined Board is recommending an equalised final dividend
of €0.326 per ordinary share, up 8% compared with the prior year.
This gives total ordinary dividends for the year of €0.436 (2010:
€0.412), up 6% on 2010. The final dividend will be paid on
21 May 2012.
dividend cover, based on adjusted earnings per share and the
total interim and proposed final dividends for the year, is 1.9 times.
The Boards of the company and Reed Elsevier PlC have adopted
dividend policies in recent years in respect of their equalised
dividends that, subject to currency considerations, grow dividends
broadly in line with adjusted earnings per share whilst maintaining
dividend cover (being the number of times the annual dividend is
covered by the adjusted earnings per share) of at least two times
over the longer term.
The total dividend paid on the ordinary shares in the financial year
was €289m (2010: €281m).
share capital
during 2011, 200,738 ordinary shares in the company were issued
as follows:
104,250 under convertible debentures at prices between
€7.354 and €9.512
96,488 under executive share option schemes at prices
between €7.301 and €9.415
Information regarding shares outstanding at 31 december 2011 is
shown in note 13 to the consolidated financial statements.
As at 31 december 2011 31,333,697 of the ordinary shares were
held in treasury including 7,380,906 held by the Reed Elsevier
Group plc Employee Benefit Trust. No R shares were held
in treasury.
As at 15 February 2012, based on the public database of and on
notification received from the Netherlands Authority for the
Financial Markets, the company is aware of interests in the capital
and voting rights of the issued share capital of the company of at
least 5% by Reed Elsevier PlC and Mondrian Investment
Partners limited.
corporate Governance
Reed Elsevier Nv and Reed Elsevier PlC are subject to various
corporate governance principles and best practice codes, in
particular the dutch Corporate Governance Code (the dutch Code)
and the UK Corporate Governance Code issued in May 2010 (the
UK Code). Reed Elsevier Nv may not apply fully the verbatim
language of these codes, but does fully apply the principles and
best practice provisions other than, in respect of the dutch Code,
the following for reasons explained below:
Best practice provision II.2.5: Executive directors are required
to build up a minimum shareholding and Reed Elsevier uses
long term incentive arrangements in the form of awards of
shares which may vest after three years. The intent of this
shareholding policy is to align the interests of senior executives
and shareholders. This intent is in compliance with the dutch
Code. Shares received on joining Reed Elsevier in
compensation for benefits forfeited under incentive schemes
from a previous employer are not to be considered as part of
the minimum shareholding in this context.
Best practice provision II.2.8: Reed Elsevier has
arrangements that are commensurate with local and legal
requirements to ensure a competitive employment offer to
its board members. Executive directors have employment
agreements under English law that provide for notice periods
not exceeding one year. There are currently no executive
directors with employment agreements under dutch law. In
the event of dismissal, notice is given in accordance with the
agreed notice period. The payment during the notice period
may be mitigated if the director finds other employment within
this period. The application of this arrangement may fall within
the best practice provision that remuneration in the event of
dismissal may not exceed the fixed component of one year’s
salary. There are no other severance arrangements in place
for the executive directors and none of the employment
agreements contain severance pay arrangements. Although
the principle that severance pay should not exceed the fixed
component of one year’s salary is supported, there may be
exceptional circumstances where this maximum would be
manifestly unreasonable that could justify additional
compensation on termination for loss of variable remuneration
components. Full disclosure on remuneration in event of
dismissal is provided in the directors’ Remuneration Report.
Best practice provisions II.2.13 and II.2.14: In view of their
detailed specificity and complexity and because of the
confidential or potentially commercially sensitive nature of the
information concerned, individual performance targets and
achievements relevant for variable executive remuneration
will only be disclosed in general terms.
Best practice provision II.3.4 and III.6.3: The disclosure of
transactions where directors have a conflict of interest, as
required by these provisions, shall be qualified to the extent
required under applicable rules and laws pertaining to the
disclosure of price sensitive information, confidentiality and
justified aspects of competition.
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
164 FInancIal statEmEnts and othER InFoRmatIon
REEd El SEvIER Nv
Principle III.7: The remuneration of Supervisory Board
members is determined by the Combined Board in the context
of the board harmonisation with Reed Elsevier PlC and Reed
Elsevier Group plc, having regard for the maximum per annum
approved by the general meeting of shareholders.
Best practice provision IV.1.1: Appointments, suspensions and
removal procedures for members of the Executive Board and
the Supervisory Board are set out in the Corporate Governance
Statement 2011. In order to safeguard the agreed board
harmonisation with the Board of Reed Elsevier PlC, the
Articles of Association of Reed Elsevier Nv provide that a
resolution of the General Shareholders’ Meeting to appoint a
member of the Executive or Supervisory Board other than in
accordance with the proposal of the Combined Board shall
require a majority of at least two thirds of the votes cast if less
than one half of the company’s issued capital is represented at
the meeting. Given the still generally low attendance rate at
shareholders’ meetings in the Netherlands, the Boards believe
that this qualified majority requirement is appropriate for this
purpose.
Best practice provision IV.3.1: It is considered impractical and
unnecessary to provide access for shareholders to all
meetings with analysts and all presentations to investors in
real time. Price sensitive and other information relevant to
shareholders is disclosed as required or as appropriate and
made available on the website. Presentations made following
the announcement of the interim and full year results are
simultaneously webcast. Investor seminars are also webcast.
For further information on the application of the dutch Code, see
the Corporate Governance Statement of Reed Elsevier Nv
published on the Reed Elsevier website, www.reedelsevier.com.
significant agreements – change of control
The governing agreement between Reed Elsevier Nv and Reed
Elsevier PlC states that upon a change of control of Reed Elsevier
Nv (for these purposes, the acquisition by a third party of 50% or
more of the issued share capital having voting rights), should there
not be a comparable offer from the offeror for Reed Elsevier PlC,
Reed Elsevier PlC may serve notice upon Reed Elsevier Nv
varying certain provisions of the governing agreement, including
the governance and the standstill provisions.
There are a number of borrowing agreements including credit
facilities that in the event of a change of control of both Reed
Elsevier Nv and Reed Elsevier PlC and, in some cases, a
consequential credit rating downgrade to sub-investment grade
may, at the option of the lenders, require repayment and/or
cancellation as appropriate.
directors
The following individuals served as members of the Supervisory
and Executive Boards during the year:
the supervisory Board
A Habgood (Chairman)
M Elliott
A Hennah
the Executive Board
E Engstrom (Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer)
M Armour
(appointed 20 April 2011)
(Chief Financial Officer)
l Hook
M van lier lels
R Polet
Sir david Reid
lord Sharman of Redlynch OBE
(retired 20 April 2011)
B van der veer
At the Annual General Meeting held in April 2011, Adrian Hennah
was appointed as a member of the Supervisory Board and lord
Sharman retired as a member of the Supervisory Board.
All members of the Executive Board and the Supervisory Board
will stand for re-appointment at the Annual General Meeting in
April 2012, including Mark Elliott and Sir david Reid, who will at
that time have served on the Supervisory Board for nine years.
A search is being conducted in conjunction with external
consultants for two suitable candidates to join the Supervisory
Board. This has resulted in the Nominations Committee
recommending to the Combined Board the appointment of david
Brennan as member of the Supervisory Board of Reed Elsevier Nv
and as a non-executive director of Reed Elsevier PlC with effect
from 1 November 2012. This will be proposed at the Annual
General Meetings in April 2012. In order to allow for an orderly
transition to new members of the Supervisory Board, it will be
proposed at the Annual General Meeting to reappoint Mark Elliot
and Sir david Reid for one additional year.
Biographical details of the directors at the date of this report are
given on pages 52 and 53. details of the remuneration of the
members of the Executive Board and of the Supervisory Board and
their interests in the share capital of the company are provided in
the directors’ Remuneration Report on pages 63 to 79.
Financial statements and accounting records
The financial statements provide a true and fair view of the state of
affairs of the company and the group as of 31 december 2011 and
of the profit or loss in 2011. In preparing the financial statements,
the Supervisory Board and the Executive Board ensure that
suitable accounting policies, consistently applied and supported
by reasonable judgements and estimates, have been used and
applicable accounting standards have been followed. The Boards
are responsible for keeping proper accounting records, which
disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial
position of the company and enable them to ensure that the
financial statements comply with the law. The Boards have
general responsibility for taking reasonable steps to safeguard
the assets of the company and to prevent and detect fraud and
other irregularities.
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
165
Internal control
As required under sections II.1.4. and II.1.5. of the dutch Code, the
Audit Committee and the Combined Board have reviewed the
effectiveness of the systems of internal control and risk
management during the last financial year. The objective of these
systems is to manage, rather than eliminate, the risk of failure to
achieve business objectives. Accordingly, they can only provide
reasonable, but not absolute, assurance against material
misstatement or loss. The outcome of this review has been
discussed with the external auditors. The Combined Board
confirmed that as regards financial reporting, the risk
management and control systems provide reasonable assurance
against material inaccuracies or loss and have functioned
properly during the financial year.
directors’ responsibility statement
The Combined Board confirms, to the best of its knowledge, that:
the consolidated financial statements, prepared in accordance
with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by
the International Accounting Standards Board and as adopted
by the European Union, give a true and fair view of the financial
position and profit or loss of the group; and
the Report of the Supervisory Board and the Executive Board
includes a fair review of the development and performance of
the business during the financial year and the position of the
group as at 31 december 2011 together with a description of the
principal risks and uncertainties that it faces.
Neither the company nor the directors accept any liability to any
person in relation to the Annual Report except to the extent that
such liability arises under dutch law.
disclosure of information to auditors
As part of the process of approving the company’s 2011 financial
statements, the Supervisory and the Executive Boards and their
members have taken steps to ensure that all relevant information
was provided to the company’s auditors and, so far as the Boards
are aware, there is no relevant audit information of which the
company’s auditors are unaware.
Going concern
The Combined Board, having made appropriate enquiries,
considers that adequate resources exist for the combined
businesses to continue in operational existence for the
foreseeable future and that, therefore, it is appropriate to adopt
the going concern basis in preparing the 2011 financial
statements. In reaching this conclusion, the Combined Board has
had due regard to the combined businesses’ financial position as
at 31 december 2011, the strong free cash flow of the combined
businesses, Reed Elsevier’s ability to access capital markets and
the principal risks facing Reed Elsevier.
A commentary on the Reed Elsevier combined businesses’
cash flows, financial position and liquidity for the year ended
31 december 2011 is set out in the Chief Financial Officer’s Report
on pages 42 to 44. This shows that, after taking account of
available cash resources and committed bank facilities that back
up short term borrowings, none of Reed Elsevier’s borrowings fall
due within the next two years. Reed Elsevier’s policies on liquidity,
capital management and management of risks relating to interest
rate, foreign exchange and credit exposures are set out on pages
46 and 47. Further information on liquidity of the combined
businesses can be found in note 18 of the combined financial
statements. The principal risks facing Reed Elsevier are set out on
pages 48 to 50.
auditors
Resolutions for the re-appointment of deloitte Accountants Bv as
auditors of the company and authorising the Supervisory Board to
determine their remuneration will be submitted to the
forthcoming Annual General Meeting on 24 April 2012.
the Executive Board
E Engstrom (Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer)
M Armour
(Chief Financial Officer)
Signed by:
the supervisory Board
A Habgood (Chairman)
M Elliott
A Hennah
l Hook
M van lier lels
R Polet
Sir david Reid
B van der veer
Registered office
Radarweg 29
1043 NX The Netherlands
Chamber of Commerce Amsterdam
Register file No: 33155037
15 February 2012
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
166 FInancIal statEmEnts and othER InFoRmatIon
REEd El SEvIER Nv
Consolidated income statement
FoR thE YEaR EndEd 31 dEcEmBER
Administrative expenses
Share of results of joint ventures
Operating profit
Finance income
Profit before tax
Taxation
Profit attributable to ordinary shareholders
Note
2
11
5
6
Consolidated statement of comprehensive income
FoR thE YEaR EndEd 31 dEcEmBER
Profit attributable to ordinary shareholders
Share of joint ventures’ other comprehensive income for the year
total comprehensive income for the year
Earnings per ordinary share
FoR thE YEaR EndEd 31 dEcEmBER
Basic earnings per share
diluted earnings per share
Consolidated statement of cash flows
FoR thE YEaR EndEd 31 dEcEmBER
cash flows from operating activities
Cash used by operations
Interest received
Tax paid
net cash from operating activities
cash flows from investing activities
dividends received from joint ventures
Increase in investment in joint ventures
net cash from investing activities
cash flows from financing activities
Equity dividends paid
Proceeds on issue of ordinary shares
decrease/(increase) in net funding balances due from joint ventures
net cash used in financing activities
2011
€m
(2)
420
418
20
438
(1)
437
2011
€m
437
20
457
2010
€m
(2)
367
365
14
379
(3)
376
2010
€m
376
71
447
Note
8
8
2011
€
0.59
0.59
2010
€
0.51
0.51
Note
10
11
11
7
10
2011
€m
2010
€m
(3)
20
(5)
12
–
–
–
(289)
2
275
(12)
(1)
14
(4)
9
1,093
(719)
374
(281)
2
(104)
(383)
movement in cash and cash equivalents
–
–
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
167
Consolidated statement of financial position
as at 31 dEcEmBER
non-current assets
Investments in joint ventures
current assets
Amounts due from joint ventures
Cash and cash equivalents
total assets
current liabilities
Payables
Taxation
total liabilities
net assets
capital and reserves
Share capital issued
Paid-in surplus
Shares held in treasury (including in joint ventures)
Translation reserve
Other reserves
total equity
Consolidated statement of changes in equity
Balance at 1 January 2010
Total comprehensive income for the year
Equity dividends paid
Issue of ordinary shares, net of expenses
Share of joint ventures’ settlement of share awards by
employee benefit trust
Share of joint ventures’ decrease in share based
remuneration reserve
Equalisation adjustments
Exchange translation differences
Balance at 1 January 2011
Total comprehensive income for the year
Equity dividends paid
Issue of ordinary shares, net of expenses
Share of joint ventures’ settlement of share awards by
employee benefit trust
Share of joint ventures’ increase in share based
remuneration reserve
Share of joint ventures’ acquisition of non-controlling
interest
Equalisation adjustments
Exchange translation differences
Balance at 31 december 2011
Note
7
7
share
capital
€m
Paid-in
surplus
€m
shares held
in treasury
€m
translation
reserves
€m
other
reserves
€m
53
–
–
1
–
–
–
–
54
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
54
2,168
–
–
1
–
–
–
–
2,169
–
–
2
–
–
–
–
–
2,171
(434)
–
–
–
5
–
–
(4)
(433)
–
–
–
4
–
–
–
(3)
(432)
(153)
98
–
–
–
–
–
4
(51)
54
–
–
–
–
–
–
3
6
(664)
349
(281)
–
(5)
(4)
3
–
(602)
403
(289)
–
(4)
16
(25)
5
–
(496)
Note
2011
€m
2010
€m
11
1,359
1,198
2
3
5
1,364
10
51
61
1,303
54
2,171
(432)
6
(496)
1,303
12
13
14
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
2
3
5
1,203
11
55
66
1,137
54
2,169
(433)
(51)
(602)
1,137
total
equity
€m
970
447
(281)
2
–
(4)
3
–
1,137
457
(289)
2
–
16
(25)
5
–
1,303
168 FInancIal statEmEnts and othER InFoRmatIon
REEd El SEvIER Nv
Group accounting policies
These consolidated financial statements, which have been
prepared under the historic cost convention, report the
consolidated statements of income, cash flow and financial
position of Reed Elsevier Nv. Unless otherwise indicated, all
amounts shown in the financial statements are in millions
of euros.
As required by a regulation adopted by the European Parliament,
the consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards
(IFRS) as endorsed by the European Union and as issued by the
International Accounting Standards Board (IASB).
The consolidated financial statements are prepared on a going
concern basis, as explained on page 165.
The Reed Elsevier combined financial statements presented in
pounds sterling on pages 84 to 122 form an integral part of the
notes to Reed Elsevier Nv’s statutory financial statements. The
primary combined financial statements and selected notes are
presented in euros on pages 123 to 136.
As a consequence of the merger of the company’s businesses
with those of Reed Elsevier PlC, described on page 55, the
shareholders of Reed Elsevier Nv and Reed Elsevier PlC can be
regarded as having the interests of a single economic group,
enjoying substantially equivalent ordinary dividend and capital
rights in the earnings and net assets of the Reed Elsevier
combined businesses.
The Reed Elsevier Nv consolidated financial statements are
presented incorporating Reed Elsevier Nv’s investments in the
Reed Elsevier combined businesses accounted for using the
equity method, as adjusted for the effects of the equalisation
arrangement between Reed Elsevier Nv and Reed Elsevier PlC.
The arrangement lays down the distribution of dividends and net
assets in such a way that Reed Elsevier Nv’s share in the profit
and net assets of the Reed Elsevier combined businesses equals
50%, with all settlements accruing to shareholders from the
equalisation arrangements taken directly to reserves.
Because the dividend paid to shareholders by Reed Elsevier Nv is
equivalent to the Reed Elsevier PlC dividend plus, other than in
special circumstances, the UK tax credit received by certain Reed
Elsevier PlC shareholders, Reed Elsevier Nv normally distributes
a higher proportion of the combined profit attributable than Reed
Elsevier PlC. Reed Elsevier PlC’s share in this difference in
dividend distributions is settled with Reed Elsevier Nv and is
credited directly to consolidated reserves under equalisation.
Reed Elsevier Nv can pay a nominal dividend on its R shares
held by a subsidiary of Reed Elsevier PlC that is lower than the
dividend on the ordinary shares. Equally, Reed Elsevier Nv has
the possibility to receive dividends directly from dutch affiliates.
Reed Elsevier PlC is compensated by direct dividend payments
by Reed Elsevier Group plc. The settlements flowing from these
arrangements are also taken directly to consolidated reserves
under equalisation.
combined financial statements
The accounting policies adopted in the preparation of the
combined financial statements are set out on pages 88 to 93.
These include policies in relation to intangible assets. Such assets
are amortised over their estimated useful economic lives which,
due to their longevity, may be for periods in excess of five years.
Basis of valuation of assets and liabilities
Reed Elsevier Nv’s 50% economic interest in the net assets of
the combined businesses has been shown on the consolidated
statement of financial position as investments in joint ventures,
net of the assets and liabilities reported as part of Reed Elsevier
Nv. Joint ventures are accounted for using the equity method.
Cash and cash equivalents are stated at fair value. Other assets
and liabilities are stated at historical cost, less provision, if
appropriate, for any impairment in value.
Foreign exchange translation
Transactions in foreign currencies are recorded at the rate of
exchange prevailing on the date of the transaction. At each
statement of financial position date, monetary assets and
liabilities that are denominated in foreign currencies are
retranslated at the rate prevailing on the statement of financial
position date. Exchange differences arising are recorded in
the income statement. The gains or losses relating to the
retranslation of Reed Elsevier Nv’s 50% interest in the net
assets of the combined businesses are classified as equity and
transferred to the translation reserve.
When foreign operations are disposed of, the related cumulative
translation differences are recognised within the income
statement in the period.
taxation
The tax expense represents the sum of the tax payable on the
current year taxable profits, adjustments in respect of prior year
taxable profits and the movements on deferred tax that are
recognised in the income statement. Tax arising in joint ventures
is included in the share of results of joint ventures.
The tax payable on current year taxable profits is calculated using
the applicable tax rate that has been enacted, or substantively
enacted, by the date of statement of financial position.
deferred tax is the tax arising on differences between the carrying
amounts of assets and liabilities in the financial statements and
their corresponding tax bases used in the computation of taxable
profit, and is accounted for using the balance sheet liability
method. deferred tax liabilities are generally recognised for all
taxable temporary differences and deferred tax assets are
recognised to the extent that, based on current forecasts, it is
probable that taxable profits will be available against which
deductible temporary differences can be utilised.
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
169
deferred tax is calculated using tax rates that have been
substantively enacted at the date of the statement of financial
position. Full provision is made for deferred tax which would
become payable on the distribution of retained profits from
foreign subsidiaries, associates or joint ventures.
Movements in deferred tax are charged and credited in the income
statement, except when they relate to items charged or credited
directly to equity, in which case the deferred tax is also recognised
in equity.
critical judgements and key sources of estimation uncertainty
Critical judgements in the preparation of the combined financial
statements are set out on pages 91 to 93.
standards, amendments and interpretations not yet effective
Recently issued standards, amendments and interpretations and
their impact on future accounting policies and reporting have been
considered on page 93 of the combined financial statements.
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
170 FInancIal statEmEnts and othER InFoRmatIon
REEd El SEvIER Nv
Notes to the consolidated financial statements
for the year ended 31 december 2011
1 Basis of preparation
The consolidated financial statements of Reed Elsevier Nv reflect the 50% economic interest that its shareholders have under the
equalisation arrangements in the Reed Elsevier combined businesses, accounted for on an equity basis.
The Reed Elsevier combined financial statements are presented in pounds sterling, which is the functional currency of Reed Elsevier
Group plc, a UK registered company which owns the publishing and information businesses of Reed Elsevier. The following analysis
presents how the consolidated financial statements of Reed Elsevier Nv, presented in euros, are derived from the Reed Elsevier
combined financial statements.
REEd ElsEVIER nV consolIdatEd PRoFIt attRIButaBlE to oRdInaRY shaREholdERs
2011
2010
Reed Elsevier combined businesses net profit attributable to parent company shareholders
in pounds sterling
Reed Elsevier combined businesses net profit attributable to parent company shareholders
in pounds sterling translated into euros at average exchange rates
Reed Elsevier combined businesses net profit attributable to parent company shareholders in euros
Reed Elsevier Nv’s 50% share of combined net profit attributable to ordinary shareholders
REEd ElsEVIER nV consolIdatEd total EquItY
Reed Elsevier combined shareholders’ equity in pounds sterling
Reed Elsevier combined shareholders’ equity in pounds sterling translated into euros
at year end exchange rates
Reed Elsevier Nv’s 50% share of combined equity
£760m
£642m
€874m
€874m
€437m
€751m
€751m
€376m
2011
2010
£2,172m £1,943m
€2,606m €2,273m
€1,303m €1,137m
2 Administrative expenses
Administrative expenses are stated after the gross remuneration for present and former directors of Reed Elsevier Nv in respect of
services rendered to Reed Elsevier Nv and the combined businesses. Fees for members of the Supervisory Board of Reed Elsevier Nv of
€0.3m (2010: €0.3m) are included in gross remuneration. Insofar as gross remuneration is related to services rendered to Reed Elsevier
Group plc group and Elsevier Reed Finance Bv group, it is borne by these groups. Reed Elsevier Nv has no employees (2010: nil).
3 Auditor’s remuneration
Audit fees payable by Reed Elsevier Nv were €50,000 (2010: €48,000). Further information on the audit and non audit fees paid by the
Reed Elsevier combined businesses to deloitte Accountants B.v. and its associates is set out in note 3 to the combined financial
statements.
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
171
4 Related party transactions
All transactions with joint ventures, which are related parties of Reed Elsevier Nv, are reflected in these financial statements. Key
management personnel are also related parties and comprise the members of the Executive Board of Reed Elsevier Nv. Transactions
with key management personnel are set out in note 30 to the combined financial statements.
5 Finance income
Finance income from joint ventures
6 Taxation
2011
€m
20
2010
€m
14
A reconciliation of the notional tax charge based on the applicable rate of tax to the actual total tax expense is set out below.
Profit before tax
Tax at applicable rate: 25.0% (2010: 25.5%)
Tax at applicable rate on share of results of joint ventures
Other
Tax expense
7 Equity dividends
oRdInaRY dIVIdEnds dEclaREd In thE YEaR
Ordinary shares
Final for prior financial year
Interim for financial year
total
R shares
2011
€m
438
110
(105)
(4)
1
2011
€m
212
77
289
–
2010
€m
379
97
(94)
–
3
2010
€m
205
76
281
–
2011
€m
2010
€m
€0.303
€0.110
€0.413
–
€0.293
€0.109
€0.402
–
The directors of Reed Elsevier Nv have proposed a final dividend of €0.326 (2010: €0.303). The cost of funding the proposed final dividend
is expected to be €228m. No liability has been recognised at the statement of financial position date.
oRdInaRY dIVIdEnds dEclaREd In thE YEaR
Ordinary shares
Interim (paid)
Final (proposed)
total
R shares
2011
€
2010
€
€0.110
€0.326
€0.436
–
€0.109
€0.303
€0.412
–
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
172 FInancIal statEmEnts and othER InFoRmatIon
REEd El SEvIER Nv
Notes to the consolidated financial statements
for the year ended 31 december 2011
8 Earnings per ordinary share (“EPS”)
Basic earnings per share
diluted earnings per share
2011
2010
Weighted
average
number of
shares
(millions)
735.3
740.8
Earnings
€m
437
437
EPs
€
0.59
0.59
Weighted
average
number of
shares
(millions)
734.5
737.8
Earnings
€m
376
376
EPS
€
0.51
0.51
The diluted EPS figures are calculated after taking account of the effect of potential additional ordinary shares arising from share
options and conditional shares.
The weighted average number of shares reflects the equivalent ordinary shares amount taking into account the R shares and is after
deducting shares held in treasury. Movements in the number of shares in issue net of treasury shares for the year ended 31 december
2011 are shown below.
numBER oF oRdInaRY shaREs
Year ended 31 december
At start of year
Issue of ordinary shares
Net release of shares by employee benefit trust
at end of year
Weighted average number of equivalent ordinary shares during the year
shares in
issue
(millions)
treasury
shares
(millions)
723.9
0.2
–
724.1
(31.7)
–
0.4
(31.3)
2011
shares in
issue net of
treasury
shares
(millions)
2010
Shares in
issue net of
treasury
shares
(millions)
692.2
0.2
0.4
692.8
735.3
691.5
0.2
0.5
692.2
734.5
The average number of equivalent ordinary shares takes into account the R shares in the company held by a subsidiary of
Reed Elsevier PlC, which represents a 5.8% interest in the company’s share capital.
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
173
9 Adjusted figures
Adjusted profit and earnings per share figures are used by management as additional performance measures. The adjusted figures are
derived as follows:
EaRnInGs PER shaRE
Profit attributable to
ordinary shares
Basic earnings
ordinary shares
Reported figures
Share of adjustments in joint ventures:
Amortisation of acquired intangible assets
Exceptional restructuring costs
Acquisition related costs
disposals and other non operating items
deferred tax adjustments
adjusted figures
10 Statement of cash flows
REconcIlIatIon oF admInIstRatIVE ExPEnsEs to cash usEd BY oPERatIons
Administrative expenses
Net movement in payables
cash used by operations
REconcIlIatIon oF nEt FundInG BalancEs duE FRom joInt VEntuREs
At start of year
Cash flow
at end of year
2011
€m
437
204
–
19
10
(60)
610
2010
€m
376
197
22
18
21
(59)
575
2011
€
0.59
0.28
–
0.03
0.01
(0.08)
0.83
2011
€m
(2)
(1)
(3)
2011
€m
1,359
(275)
1,084
2010
€
0.51
0.27
0.03
0.02
0.03
(0.08)
0.78
2010
€m
(2)
1
(1)
2010
€m
1,255
104
1,359
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
174 FInancIal statEmEnts and othER InFoRmatIon
REEd El SEvIER Nv
Notes to the consolidated financial statements
for the year ended 31 december 2011
11 Investments in joint ventures
Share of results of joint ventures
Share of joint ventures’ other comprehensive income
Share of joint ventures’ increase/(decrease) in share based remuneration reserve
Share of joint ventures’ acquisition of non-controlling interests
Equalisation adjustments
dividends received from joint ventures
Increase in investment in joint ventures
(Increase)/decrease in net funding balances due from joint ventures
Net movement in the year
At start of year
at end of year
2011
€m
420
20
16
(25)
5
–
–
(275)
161
1,198
1,359
2010
€m
367
71
(4)
–
3
(1,093)
719
104
167
1,031
1,198
Summarised information showing total amounts in respect of joint ventures and Reed Elsevier Nv shareholders’ 50% share is set
out below:
Revenue
net profit for the year
total joint ventures
Reed Elsevier nV
shareholders’ share
2011
€m
6,902
882
2010
€m
7,084
758
2011
€m
3,451
420
2010
€m
3,542
367
Reed Elsevier Nv’s share of joint ventures’ net profit attributable to parent company shareholders for the year excludes the net profit
that arose directly in Reed Elsevier Nv of €17m (2010: €9m).
Total assets
Total liabilities
net assets/(liabilities)
Attributable to:
Joint ventures
Non-controlling interests
Net funding balances due from joint ventures
total
total joint ventures
2011
€m
13,804
(11,168)
2,636
2010
€m
13,055
(10,750)
2,305
2,606
30
2,636
2,273
32
2,305
Reed Elsevier nV
shareholders’ share
2011
€m
6,897
(6,622)
275
275
–
275
1,084
1,359
2010
€m
6,523
(6,684)
(161)
(161)
–
(161)
1,359
1,198
The above amounts exclude assets and liabilities held directly by Reed Elsevier Nv and include the counterparty balances of amounts
owed to and by other Reed Elsevier businesses. Included within Reed Elsevier Nv’s share of assets and liabilities are cash and cash
equivalents of €433m (2010: €431m) and borrowings of €2,561m (2010: €2,508m) respectively.
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
175
12 Payables
Included within payables are employee convertible debenture loans of €8m (2010: €9m) with a weighted average interest rate of 3.13%
(2010: 3.30%). depending on the conversion terms, the surrender of €200 par value debenture loans qualifies for 50 Reed Elsevier Nv
ordinary shares.
13 Share capital and shares held in treasury
authoRIsEd
Ordinary shares of €0.07 each
R shares of €0.70 each
total
IssuEd and FullY PaId
At 1 January 2010
Issue of ordinary shares
At 1 January 2011
Issue of ordinary shares
at 31 december 2011
no. of shares
1,800,000,000
26,000,000
R shares
number
4,303,179
–
4,303,179
–
4,303,179
ordinary
shares
number
R shares
€m
ordinary
shares
€m
723,692,901
184,116
723,877,017
200,738
724,077,755
3
–
3
–
3
50
1
51
–
51
€m
126
18
144
total
€m
53
1
54
–
54
The issue of shares relates to the exercise of share options. details of share option and conditional share schemes are set out in note 6
to the Reed Elsevier combined financial statements.
At 31 december 2011 4,303,179 R shares were held by a subsidiary of Reed Elsevier PlC. The R shares are convertible at the election
of the holders into ten ordinary shares each and each R share carries an entitlement to cast ten votes. They have otherwise the same
rights as the ordinary shares, except that Reed Elsevier Nv may pay a lower dividend on the R shares.
details of shares held in treasury are provided in note 28 to the Reed Elsevier combined financial statements.
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
176 FInancIal statEmEnts and othER InFoRmatIon
REEd El SEvIER Nv
Notes to the consolidated financial statements
for the year ended 31 december 2011
14 Other reserves
At start of year
Profit attributable to ordinary shareholders
Share of joint ventures’:
Actuarial losses on defined benefit pension schemes
Fair value movements on available for sale investments
Fair value movements on cash flow hedges
Tax recognised directly in equity
Increase/(decrease) in share based remuneration reserve
Acquisition of non-controlling interests
Settlement of share awards by employee benefit trust
Transfer to net profit from hedge reserve
Equalisation adjustments
Equity dividends paid
at end of year
15 Contingent liabilities
There are contingent liabilities in respect of borrowings of joint ventures guaranteed by Reed Elsevier Nv as follows:
Guaranteed jointly and severally with Reed Elsevier Plc
2011
€m
(602)
437
(65)
(1)
(14)
24
16
(25)
(4)
22
5
(289)
(496)
2010
€m
(664)
376
(37)
–
(34)
17
(4)
–
(5)
27
3
(281)
(602)
2011
€m
4,704
2010
€m
4,591
Financial instruments disclosures in respect of the borrowings covered by the above guarantees are given in note 18 to the Reed Elsevier
combined financial statements.
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
16 Principal joint ventures
Reed Elsevier Group plc
Incorporated and operating in Great Britain
1-3 Strand
london WC2N 5JR
Holding company for operating businesses involved in
science & medical, risk management, legal and business
publishing and organisation of trade exhibitions
Elsevier Reed Finance BV
Incorporated in the Netherlands
Radarweg 29
1043 NX Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Holding company for financing businesses
18,385 ordinary R shares
18,385 ordinary E shares
100,000 7.5% cumulative preference non voting shares
Equivalent to a 50% equity interest
133 ordinary R shares
205 ordinary E shares
Equivalent to a 61% equity interest
177
% holding
100%
–
100%
100%
–
The R shares in Reed Elsevier Group plc and Elsevier Reed Finance Bv and the non-voting preference shares in Reed Elsevier Group plc
are owned by Reed Elsevier PlC.
In addition, Reed Elsevier Nv holds shares with special dividend rights in Reed Elsevier Overseas Bv, a subsidiary of Reed Elsevier
Group plc with registered offices in Amsterdam. These shares are included in the amount shown under investments in joint ventures
and enable Reed Elsevier Nv to receive dividends from companies within the same tax jurisdiction.
A list of companies within Reed Elsevier is filed with the Amsterdam Chamber of Commerce in the Netherlands.
17 Approval of financial statements
The consolidated financial statements were signed and authorised for issue by the Combined Board of directors on 15 February 2012.
a j habgood
Chairman of the Supervisory Board
and the Combined Board
m h armour
Chief Financial Officer
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
178 FInancIal statEmEnts and othER InFoRmatIon
REEd El SEvIER Nv
Independent auditor’s report on the consolidated
financial statements to the shareholders of Reed Elsevier Nv
opinion with respect to the consolidated financial statements
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements give a true
and fair view of the financial position of Reed Elsevier Nv as at
31 december 2011, and of its results and its cash flows for the year
then ended in accordance with International Financial Reporting
Standards as adopted by the European Union and with Part 9 of
Book 2 of the dutch Civil Code.
Report on other legal and regulatory requirements
Pursuant to the legal requirement under 2:393 sub 5 at e and f of
the dutch Civil Code, we have no deficiencies to report as a result
of our examination whether the report of the Supervisory Board
and the Executive Board, to the extent we can assess, has been
prepared in accordance with Part 9 of Book 2 of this Code, and
whether the information as required under section 2:392 sub 1
at b-h has been annexed. Further we report that the report of the
Supervisory Board and the Executive Board, to the extent we can
assess, is consistent with the consolidated financial statements
as required by 2:391 sub 4 of the dutch Civil Code.
deloitte accountants B.V.
A Sandler
Amsterdam
The Netherlands
15 February 2012
Report on the consolidated financial statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial
statements 2011 which are part of the financial statements of
Reed Elsevier Nv, Amsterdam, which comprise the consolidated
statement of financial position as at 31 december 2011, the
consolidated income statement, the consolidated statement of
comprehensive income, the consolidated statement of cash
flows, and the consolidated statement of changes in equity for
the year then ended and the notes, comprising a summary of the
accounting policies and other explanatory information, as set
out in pages 166 to 177.
management’s responsibility
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair
presentation of the consolidated financial statements in
accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as
adopted by the European Union and with Part 9 of Book 2 of the
dutch Civil Code, and for the preparation of the report of the
Supervisory Board and the Executive Board in accordance
with Part 9 of Book 2 of the dutch Civil Code. Furthermore,
management is responsible for such internal control as it
determines necessary to enable the preparation of financial
statements that are free from material misstatement, whether
due to fraud or error.
auditor’s responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the consolidated
financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit
in accordance with dutch law, including the dutch Standards on
Auditing. This requires that we comply with ethical requirements
and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance
about whether the consolidated financial statements are free from
material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence
about the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial
statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s
judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material
misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether
due to fraud or error.
In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal
control relevant to the entity’s preparation and fair presentation
of the consolidated financial statements in order to design audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not
for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of
the entity’s internal control. An audit also includes evaluating
the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the
reasonableness of accounting estimates made by management,
as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated
financial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient
and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
Parent company profit and loss account
FoR thE YEaR EndEd 31 dEcEmBER
Administrative expenses
dividends received from joint ventures
Finance income from joint ventures
Taxation
Profit attributable to ordinary shareholders
Parent company balance sheet
as at 31 dEcEmBER
Fixed assets
Investments in joint ventures
current assets
Amounts due from joint ventures – funding
Amounts due from joint ventures – other
Cash
creditors: amounts falling due within one year
Taxation
Other creditors
net current assets
net assets
capital and reserves
Share capital issued
Paid-in surplus
Shares held in treasury
Other reserves
Reserves
shareholders’ funds
179
2011
€m
(2)
–
20
(1)
17
2010
€m
(2)
1,093
14
(3)
1,102
Note
2011
€m
2010
€m
3,602
3,597
1
1,084
2
1,086
3
1,089
(51)
(10)
(61)
1,028
4,630
54
2,171
(336)
191
2,550
4,630
1,359
2
1,361
3
1,364
(55)
(22)
(77)
1,287
4,884
54
2,169
(336)
175
2,822
4,884
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
The parent company financial statements were signed and authorised for issue by the Combined Board of directors on 15 February 2012.
a j habgood
Chairman of the Supervisory Board
m h armour
Chief Financial Officer
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
180 FInancIal statEmEnts and othER InFoRmatIon
REEd El SEvIER Nv
Parent company reconciliation of shareholders’ funds
At 1 January 2010
Profit attributable to ordinary shareholders
Equity dividends paid
Issue of shares, net of expenses
Equity instruments granted to employees of combined businesses
At 1 January 2011
Profit attributable to ordinary shareholders
Equity dividends paid
Issue of shares, net of expenses
Equity instruments granted to employees of combined businesses
at 31 december 2011
share
capital
issued
€m
Paid-in
surplus (
€m
i)
shares
held in
treasury
€m
other
reserves (
€m
ii) Reserves (
€m
iii)
53
–
–
1
–
54
–
–
–
–
54
2,168
–
–
1
–
2,169
–
–
2
–
2,171
(336)
–
–
–
–
(336)
–
–
–
–
(336)
179
–
–
–
(4)
175
–
–
–
16
191
2,001
1,102
(281)
–
–
2,822
17
(289)
–
–
2,550
total
€m
4,065
1,102
(281)
2
(4)
4,884
17
(289)
2
16
4,630
(i) Within paid-in surplus, an amount of €1,994m (2010: €1,992m) is free of tax.
(ii) Other reserves relate to equity instruments granted to employees of the combined businesses under share based remuneration
arrangements. Other reserves do not form part of free reserves.
(iii) Free reserves of the company at 31 december 2011 were €4,385m (2010: €4,655m), comprising reserves and paid-in surplus less
shares held in treasury.
Parent company accounting policies
Basis of preparation
The parent company financial statements have been prepared
under the historical cost convention. As permitted by 2:362
subsection 1 of the dutch Civil Code for companies with
international operations, the parent company financial statements
have been prepared in accordance with UK Generally Accepted
Accounting Practice (UK GAAP) ensuring consistency. The
financial information relating to the company is recognised in the
consolidated financial statements.
The parent company financial statements are prepared on a going
concern basis, as explained on page 165.
The Reed Elsevier Nv accounting policies under UK GAAP are set
out below.
Investments
Fixed asset investments in the combined businesses are stated
at cost, less provision, if appropriate, for any impairment in value.
The fair value of the award of share options and conditional
shares over Reed Elsevier Nv ordinary shares to employees
of the Reed Elsevier combined businesses are treated as a
capital contribution.
Principal joint ventures are set out in note 16 of the
Reed Elsevier Nv consolidated financial statements.
Short term investments are stated at the lower of cost and
net realisable value. Other assets and liabilities are stated at
historical cost, less provision, if appropriate, for any impairment
in value.
shares held in treasury
The amount of consideration paid, including directly attributable
costs, for shares repurchased is recognised as shares held in
treasury and presented as a deduction from total equity.
Foreign exchange translation
Transactions entered into in foreign currencies are recorded at
the exchange rates applicable at the time of the transaction.
taxation
deferred taxation is provided in full for timing differences using
the liability method. deferred tax assets are only recognised to
the extent that they are considered recoverable in the short term.
deferred taxation balances are not discounted.
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
181
Notes to the parent company financial statements
1 Other creditors
Other creditors include €8m (2010: €9m) of employee convertible debenture loans with a weighted average interest rate of 3.13%
(2010: 3.30%). depending on the conversion terms, the surrender of €200 par value debenture loans qualifies for 50 Reed Elsevier Nv
ordinary shares.
2 Reconciliations to consolidated financial statements
A reconciliation of the parent company profit attributable to ordinary shareholders prepared under UK GAAP and the consolidated profit
attributable to ordinary shareholders prepared under IFRS and presented under the equity method is provided below:
YEaR EndEd 31 dEcEmBER
Parent company profit attributable to ordinary shareholders
Share of results of joint ventures
dividends received from joint ventures
consolidated profit attributable to ordinary shareholders using the equity method
2011
€m
17
420
–
437
2010
€m
1,102
367
(1,093)
376
A reconciliation between the parent company shareholders’ funds prepared under UK GAAP and the consolidated shareholders’ funds
prepared under IFRS and presented under the equity method is provided below:
as at 31 dEcEmBER
Parent company shareholders’ funds
Cumulative share of results of joint ventures less cumulative dividends received from joint ventures
Cumulative currency translation adjustments
Cumulative equalisation and other adjustments
Share of treasury shares held by joint ventures’ employee benefit trust
Share of IFRS adjustments in joint ventures
Equity instruments granted to employees of combined businesses
consolidated shareholders’ funds using the equity method
2011
€m
4,630
(2,327)
(214)
103
(96)
(602)
(191)
1,303
2010
€m
4,884
(2,747)
(271)
145
(97)
(602)
(175)
1,137
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
182 FInancIal statEmEnts and othER InFoRmatIon
REEd El SEvIER Nv
Additional information
R shares
Reed Elsevier Nv has two types of shares: ordinary shares of €0.07 nominal value and R shares of €0.70 nominal value. Each R share is
convertible into 10 ordinary shares and is entitled to cast ten (10) votes. Otherwise it has the same rights as an ordinary share, except that
Reed Elsevier Nv may pay a lower dividend on it, but not less than 1% of the nominal value of an R share.
Profit allocation
The Articles of Association provide that distributions of dividend may only be made insofar as the company’s equity exceeds the amount
of the paid in capital, increased by the reserves which must be kept by virtue of the law and may be made in cash or in shares, at the
proposal of the Combined Board. distribution of dividends on ordinary shares and on the class R shares shall be made in proportion to
the nominal value of each share. The Combined Board may resolve that the dividend to be paid on each class R share shall be lower than
the dividend to be paid on each ordinary share, resolving at the same time what amount of dividend shall be paid on each ordinary share
and each class R share, respectively.
PRoPosal FoR allocatIon oF PRoFIt
Final dividend on ordinary shares for prior financial year
Interim dividend on ordinary shares for financial year
dividend on R shares
Retained (loss)/profit
2011
€m
212
77
–
(272)
17
2010
€m
205
76
–
821
1,102
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
183
Independent auditor’s report on the parent company
financial statements to the shareholders of Reed Elsevier Nv
opinion with respect to the parent company financial statements
In our opinion, the parent company financial statements give a
true and fair view of the financial position of Reed Elsevier Nv as at
31 december 2011, and of its results and its cash flows for the year
then ended in accordance with accounting practices generally
accepted in the United Kingdom and with Part 9 of Book 2 of the
dutch Civil Code.
Report on other legal and regulatory requirements
Pursuant to the legal requirement under 2:393 sub 5 at e and f of
the dutch Civil Code, we have no deficiencies to report as a result
of our examination whether the report of the Supervisory Board
and the Executive Board, to the extent we can assess, has been
prepared in accordance with Part 9 of Book 2 of this Code, and
whether the information as required under section 2:392 sub 1
at b-h has been annexed. Further we report that the report of
the Supervisory Board and the Executive Board, to the extent
we can assess, is consistent with the parent company financial
statements as required by 2:391 sub 4 of the dutch Civil Code.
deloitte accountants B.V.
A Sandler
Amsterdam
The Netherlands
15 February 2012
Report on the company financial statements
We have audited the accompanying parent company financial
statements 2011 which are part of the financial statements of Reed
Elsevier Nv, Amsterdam, which comprise the parent company
balance sheet as at 31 december 2011, the parent company profit
and loss account for the year then ended, the parent company
reconciliation of shareholders’ funds and the notes, comprising
a summary of the accounting policies and the additional
information, as set out in pages 179 to 182.
management’s responsibility
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair
presentation of the parent company financial statements both in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United Kingdom and with Part 9 of Book 2 of the dutch Civil Code,
and for the preparation of the report of the Supervisory Board and
the Executive Board in accordance with Part 9 of Book 2 of the
dutch Civil Code. Furthermore, management is responsible for
such internal control as it determines necessary to enable the
preparation of financial statements that are free from material
misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
auditor’s responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the parent company
financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit
in accordance with dutch law, including the dutch Standards on
Auditing. This requires that we comply with ethical requirements
and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance
about whether the parent company financial statements are free
from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence
about the amounts and disclosures in the parent company
financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the
auditor’s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of
material misstatement of the parent company financial
statements, whether due to fraud or error.
In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal
control relevant to the entity’s preparation and fair presentation
of the parent company financial statements in order to design
audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but
not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness
of the entity’s internal control. An audit also includes evaluating
the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the
reasonableness of accounting estimates made by management,
as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the parent
company financial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient
and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
184 FInancIal statEmEnts and othER InFoRmatIon
REEd El SEvIER Nv
5 year summary
combined financial information
Revenue – continuing operations
Reported operating profit – continuing operations
Adjusted operating profit – continuing operations
Reported profit attributable to shareholders – total operations
Adjusted profit attributable to shareholders – total operations
Reed Elsevier nV consolidated financial information
Reported profit attributable to shareholders
Adjusted profit attributable to shareholders
Reported earnings per ordinary share (€)
Adjusted earnings per ordinary share (€)
dividend per ordinary share (€)
Note
2
2
2
3
2011
€m
6,902
1,386
1,870
874
1,219
437
610
€0.59
€0.83
€0.436
2010
€m
7,084
1,275
1,819
751
1,150
376
575
€0.51
€0.78
€0.412
2009
€m
6,800
881
1,758
438
1,099
219
550
€0.32
€0.79
€0.400
2008
€m
6,721
1,135
1,737
587
1,159
294
580
€0.44
€0.87
€0.404
2007
€m
6,693
1,296
1,660
1,709
1,244
855
622
€1.10
€0.80
€0.425
(1) Adjusted figures are presented as additional performance measures used by management and are stated before amortisation and
impairment of acquired intangible assets and goodwill, exceptional restructuring and acquisition related costs, and in respect of
attributable profit, reflect a tax rate that excludes the effect of movements in deferred taxation assets and liabilities that are not
expected to crystallise in the near term and includes the benefit of tax amortisation where available on acquired goodwill and
intangible assets. Acquisition related costs and profit and loss from disposal gains and losses and other non operating items are
also excluded from the adjusted figures.
(2) Revenue, reported operating profit and adjusted operating profit are presented for continuing operations. Net profit from
discontinued operations is included in profit attributable to shareholders.
(3) dividend per ordinary share is based on the interim dividend and proposed final dividend for the relevant year, and does not include
the €1.767 per share special distribution in 2008.
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
185
Other
information
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
In this section
Additional information for US Investors
186 Reed Elsevier combined businesses
188 Reed Elsevier PLC
189 Reed Elsevier NV
Shareholder information
190 Shareholder information
192 Contacts
193 2012 financial calendar
Principal operating locations
194 Principal operating locations
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
186 FInAncIAl StAtEmEntS And othER InFoRmAtIon
REEd ELSEV iER COmBiNEd BuSiNESSES
Reed Elsevier combined businesses
Summary financial information in US dollars
Basis of preparation
The summary financial information is a simple translation of the Reed Elsevier combined financial statements into uS dollars at the
stated rates of exchange. The financial information provided below is prepared under iFRS as used in the preparation of the Reed
Elsevier combined financial statements. it does not represent a restatement under uS GAAP which would be different in some
significant respects.
ExchAngE RAtES FoR tRAnSlAtIon
uS dollars to sterling
income statement
Statement of financial
position
2011
1.60
2010
1.55
2011
1.55
2010
1.56
Combined income statement
FoR thE YEAR EndEd 31 dEcEmBER
Revenue
Operating profit
Profit before tax
Profit attributable to parent companies’ shareholders
Adjusted operating profit
Adjusted profit before tax
Adjusted profit attributable to parent companies’ shareholders
2011
US$m
9,603
1,928
1,517
1,216
2,602
2,226
1,696
2010
uS$m
9,385
1,690
1,190
995
2,410
1,982
1,524
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
187
Combined statement of cash flows
FoR thE YEAR EndEd 31 dEcEmBER
Net cash from operating activities
Net cash used in investing activities
Net cash used in financing activities
decrease in cash and cash equivalents
movement in cash and cash equivalents
At start of year
decrease in cash and cash equivalents
Exchange translation differences
At end of year
Adjusted operating cash flow
Combined statement of financial position
AS At 31 dEcEmBER
Non-current assets
Current assets
Assets held for sale
total assets
Current liabilities
Non-current liabilities
Liabilities associated with assets held for sale
total liabilities
net assets
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
2011
US$m
2,052
(1,154)
(968)
(70)
1,158
(70)
37
1,125
2,424
2010
uS$m
2,097
(510)
(1,587)
–
1,189
–
(31)
1,158
2,354
2011
US$m
13,812
3,949
68
17,829
6,857
7,541
26
14,424
3,405
2010
uS$m
13,383
4,023
–
17,406
6,079
8,254
–
14,333
3,073
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
188 FInAncIAl StAtEmEntS And othER InFoRmAtIon
REEd ELSEV iER PLC
Reed Elsevier PLC
Summary financial information in US dollars
Basis of preparation
The summary financial information is a simple translation of the Reed Elsevier PLC consolidated financial statements into uS dollars
at the stated rates of exchange. The financial information provided below is prepared under iFRS as used in the preparation of the Reed
Elsevier PLC consolidated financial statements. it does not represent a restatement under uS GAAP which would be different in some
significant respects.
ExchAngE RAtES FoR tRAnSlAtIon oF StERlIng ($:£1)
income statement
Statement of financial position
Consolidated income statement
FoR thE YEAR EndEd 31 dEcEmBER
Profit attributable to ordinary shareholders
Adjusted profit attributable to 52.9% interest in Reed Elsevier combined businesses
Share of joint ventures’:
Amortisation of acquired intangible assets
Exceptional restructuring costs
Acquisition related costs
disposals and other non operating items
deferred tax adjustments
Profit attributable to 52.9% interest in Reed Elsevier combined businesses
dAtA PER AmERIcAn dEPoSItARY ShARE (AdS)
Earnings per AdS based on 52.9% interest in Reed Elsevier combined businesses
Adjusted
Basic
Net dividend per AdS declared in the year
Net dividend per AdS paid and proposed in relation to the financial year
Consolidated statement of financial position
AS At 31 dEcEmBER
Shareholders’ equity
2011
US$:£
1.60
1.55
2010
uS$:£
1.55
1.56
2011
US$m
622
898
(301)
–
(27)
(13)
86
643
2011
US$
$2.99
$2.07
$1.32
$1.38
2010
uS$m
507
806
(276)
(31)
(23)
(31)
82
527
2010
uS$
$2.69
$1.69
$1.26
$1.26
2011
US$m
1,781
2010
uS$m
1,604
Adjusted earnings per American depositary Share is based on Reed Elsevier PLC shareholders’ 52.9% share of the adjusted profit
attributable of the Reed Elsevier combined businesses, which excludes amortisation of acquired intangible assets, exceptional
restructuring and acquisition related costs, disposal gains and losses and other non operating items, related tax effects and movements
in deferred tax assets and liabilities that are not expected to crystallise in the near term and include the benefit of tax amortisation where
available on acquired goodwill and intangible assets. Adjusted figures are additional performance measures used by management and
are described in note 9 to the Reed Elsevier PLC consolidated financial statements.
Reed Elsevier PLC shares are quoted on the New York Stock Exchange and trading is in the form of American depositary Shares (AdSs),
evidenced by American depositary Receipts (AdRs), representing four Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shares. (CuSiP No. 758205207;
trading symbol, RuK; Bank of New York is the AdR depositary.)
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
189
Reed Elsevier NV
Summary financial information in US dollars
Basis of preparation
The summary financial information is a simple translation of the Reed Elsevier NV consolidated financial statements into uS dollars at
the stated rates of exchange. The financial information provided below is prepared under iFRS as used in the preparation of the Reed
Elsevier NV consolidated financial statements. it does not represent a restatement under uS GAAP which would be different in some
significant respects.
ExchAngE RAtES FoR tRAnSlAtIon oF EURo ($:€1)
income statement
Statement of financial position
Consolidated income statement
FoR thE YEAR EndEd 31 dEcEmBER
Adjusted profit attributable to ordinary shareholders
Share of joint ventures’:
Amortisation of acquired intangible assets
Exceptional restructuring costs
Acquisition related costs
disposals and other non operating items
deferred tax adjustments
Profit attributable to ordinary businesses
dAtA PER AmERIcAn dEPoSItARY ShARE (AdS)
Earnings per AdS based on 50% interest in Reed Elsevier combined businesses
Adjusted
Basic
Net dividend per AdS declared in the year
Net dividend per AdS paid and proposed in relation to the financial year
Consolidated statement of financial position
AS At 31 dEcEmBER
Shareholders’ equity
2011
US$:€
1.39
1.29
2010
uS$:€
1.32
1.33
2011
US$m
849
(284)
–
(26)
(14)
83
608
2011
US$
$2.31
$1.64
$1.15
$1.21
2010
uS$m
762
(261)
(29)
(24)
(28)
78
498
2010
uS$
$2.07
$1.35
$1.07
$1.09
2011
US$m
1,683
2010
uS$m
1,516
Adjusted earnings per American depositary Share is based on Reed Elsevier NV shareholders’ 50% share of the adjusted profit
attributable of the Reed Elsevier combined businesses, which excludes amortisation of acquired intangible assets, exceptional
restructuring and acquisition related costs, disposal gains and losses and other non operating items, related tax effects and movements
in deferred tax assets and liabilities that are not expected to crystallise in the near term and includes the benefit of tax amortisation
where available on acquired goodwill and intangible assets. Adjusted figures are additional performance measures used by
management and are described in note 9 to the Reed Elsevier NV consolidated financial statements.
Reed Elsevier NV shares are quoted on the New York Stock Exchange and trading is in the form of American depositary Shares (AdSs),
evidenced by American depositary Receipts (AdRs), representing two Reed Elsevier NV ordinary shares. (CuSiP No. 758204200;
trading symbol, ENL; Bank of New York is the AdR depositary.)
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
190 FInAncIAl StAtEmEntS And othER InFoRmAtIon
ShAREhOLdER iNFORmATiON
Shareholder information
Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
The Annual Reports and Financial Statements for the Reed
Elsevier combined businesses, Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed
Elsevier NV for the year ended 31 december 2011, and the
Corporate Governance Statement of Reed Elsevier NV are
available on the Reed Elsevier website, and from the registered
offices of the respective parent companies shown on page 192.
Additional financial information, including the interim and Full
Year Results Announcements, interim management Statements
and presentations is also available on the Reed Elsevier website
www.reedelsevier.com.
The Reed Elsevier combined financial statements set out in the
Annual Reports and Financial Statements are expressed in
sterling, with summary combined financial information expressed
in euros. The financial statements of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed
Elsevier NV are expressed in sterling and euros respectively.
Interim results
Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV no longer publish interim
results in hard copy. The interim results are available on the Reed
Elsevier website.
Share price information
Reed Elsevier PLC’s ordinary shares are quoted on the London
Stock Exchange.
Reed Elsevier NV’s ordinary shares are quoted on the Euronext
Amsterdam Stock Exchange.
The Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV ordinary shares are
quoted on the New York Stock Exchange in the form of American
depositary Shares (AdSs), evidenced by American depositary
Receipts (AdRs). Each Reed Elsevier PLC AdR represents four
Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shares. Each Reed Elsevier NV AdR
represents two Reed Elsevier NV ordinary shares.
The Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV ordinary share
prices and the AdR prices may be obtained from the Reed Elsevier
website, other online sources and the financial pages of some
newspapers.
FOR FuRThER iNFORmATiON ViSiT www.REEdElSEvIER.com
Information for Reed Elsevier Plc
ordinary shareholders
Shareholder services
The Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary share register is administered
by Equiniti Limited. Equiniti provides a free online portal for
shareholders at www.shareview.co.uk. Shareview provides
shareholders with instant access to details of their shareholding
and dividend payments, with the ability to update personal details
and to register a bank mandate. Equiniti’s contact details appear
on page 192.
Electronic communications
While hard copy shareholder communications continue to be
available to those shareholders actively requesting them, in
accordance with the Companies Act 2006 and its Articles of
Association, Reed Elsevier PLC uses the Reed Elsevier website
as the main method of communicating with shareholders.
By registering their details online at Shareview, shareholders
can be notified by email when shareholder communications
are published on the website. Shareholders can also use the
Shareview website to appoint a proxy to vote on their behalf at
shareholder meetings.
Shareholders who hold their Reed Elsevier PLC shares through
CREST may appoint proxies for shareholder meetings through
the CREST electronic proxy appointment service by using the
procedures described in the CREST manual.
dividend mandates
Shareholders are encouraged to have their dividends paid
directly into a uK bank or building society account. This method
of payment reduces the risk of delay or loss of dividend cheques
in the post and ensures the account is credited on the dividend
payment date. A dividend mandate form can be obtained online
at www.shareview.co.uk, or by contacting Equiniti at the address
shown on page 192.
Equiniti has established a service for overseas shareholders in
over 30 countries, which enables shareholders to have their
dividends automatically converted from sterling and paid directly
into their nominated bank account. Further details of this service,
and the fees applicable, are available at www.shareview.co.uk or
by contacting Equiniti at the address shown on page 192.
dividend Reinvestment Plan
Shareholders can choose to reinvest their Reed Elsevier PLC
dividends by purchasing further shares through the dividend
Reinvestment Plan (“dRiP”) provided by Equiniti. Further
information concerning the dRiP facility, together with the terms
and conditions and an application form can be obtained online at
www.shareview.co.uk/dividends or by contacting Equiniti at the
address shown on page 192.
Share dealing service
A telephone and internet dealing service is available through
Reed Elsevier PLC’s Registrar, which provides a simple way for
uK-resident shareholders to buy or sell Reed Elsevier PLC
shares. For telephone dealing call 08456 037 037 between 8.00am
and 4.30pm, monday to Friday, and for internet dealing log on to
www.shareview.co.uk/dealing. You will need your shareholder
account number shown on your dividend tax voucher.
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
191
Individual savings accounts (ISA)
A single company iSA for Reed Elsevier PLC shares is
available through Equiniti. details may be obtained from
www.shareview.co.uk/iSA, by writing to Equiniti at the address
shown on page 192, or by calling their iSA helpline on 0871 384 2244.
Sharegift
The Orr mackintosh Foundation operates a charity share donation
scheme for shareholders with small parcels of shares whose
value makes it uneconomic to sell them. details of the scheme
can be obtained from the ShareGift website at www.sharegift.org,
or by telephoning ShareGift on 020 7930 3737.
Sub-division of ordinary shares and share consolidation
On 28 July 1986 each Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary share of £1
nominal value was sub-divided into four ordinary shares of 25p
each. On 2 may 1997 each 25p ordinary share was sub-divided into
two ordinary shares of 12.5p each. On 7 January 2008 the ordinary
shares of 12.5p each were consolidated on the basis of 58 new
ordinary shares of 1451⁄116p nominal value for every 67 ordinary
shares of 12.5p each held.
capital gains tax
The mid-market price of Reed Elsevier PLC’s £1 ordinary shares
on 31 march 1982 was 282p. Adjusting for the sub-divisions and
share consolidation referred to above, results in an equivalent
mid-market price of 40.72p for each existing ordinary share of
1451⁄116p nominal value.
warning to shareholders – unsolicited investment advice
many companies have become aware that their shareholders have
received unsolicited phone calls or correspondence concerning
investment matters. These are typically from overseas-based
‘brokers’ who target uK shareholders, offering to sell them what
often turn out to be worthless or high-risk shares in uS or uK
investments. These operations are commonly known as ‘boiler
room scams’.
Shareholders are advised to be very wary of any unsolicited
advice, offers to buy shares at a discount or offers of free company
reports. if you receive any unsolicited investment advice, check
that the person or organisation is properly authorised by the FSA
before getting involved by visiting www.fsa.gov.uk/register/ and
contacting the firm using the details on the register. if you deal
with an unauthorised firm, you will not be eligible to receive
payment under the Financial Service Compensation Scheme.
The FSA can be contacted at www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/doing/
regulated/law/alerts/overseas.shtml.
Information for Reed Elsevier nv
ordinary shareholders
Shareholder enquiries
Enquiries from holders of Reed Elsevier NV registered ordinary
shares in relation to share transfers, dividends, change of address
and bank accounts should be directed to the Company Secretary
of Reed Elsevier NV, at the registered office address shown on
page 192.
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
dividends
dividends on Reed Elsevier NV ordinary shares are declared and
paid in euros. Registered shareholders in Reed Elsevier NV will
receive dividends from the company by transmission to the bank
account which they have notified to the company. dividends on
shares in bearer form are paid through the intermediary of a bank
or broker.
dividend Reinvestment Plan
By instructing their bank or intermediary, shareholders can
choose to reinvest their Reed Elsevier NV dividends by purchasing
further shares through the dividend Reinvestment Plan (“dRiP”)
provided by Royal Bank of Scotland N.V. Further information
concerning the dRiP facility can be obtained online at
www.securitiesinfo.nl.
consolidation of ordinary shares
On 7 January 2008 each Reed Elsevier NV ordinary share of €0.06
each were consolidated on the basis of 58 new ordinary shares of
€0.07 each for every 67 ordinary shares of €0.06 held.
Information for Reed Elsevier Plc and
Reed Elsevier nv AdR holders
The Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV AdR depositary is
BNY mellon. Reed Elsevier PLC’s CuSiP number is 758205207
and its trading symbol is RuK. Each Reed Elsevier PLC AdR
represents four Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shares. Reed Elsevier
NV’s CuSiP number is 758204200 and its trading symbol is ENL.
Each Reed Elsevier NV AdR represents two Reed Elsevier NV
ordinary shares.
AdR shareholder services
Enquiries concerning Reed Elsevier PLC or Reed Elsevier NV
AdRs should be addressed to the AdR depositary at the address
shown on page 192.
dividends
dividend payments on Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV
AdRs are converted into uS dollars by the AdR depositary.
Annual Report on Form 20-F
The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the Reed Elsevier combined
businesses, Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV will be filed
electronically with the united States Securities and Exchange
Commission. A copy of Form 20-F for the year ended 31 december
2011 will be available on the Reed Elsevier website, or from the
AdR depositary at the address shown on page 192.
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
Reed Elsevier nv
Radarweg 29
1043 NX Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 (0)20 485 2222
Fax: +31 (0)20 485 2032
deloitte Accountants B.V.
Orlyplein 10
1043 dP Amsterdam
The Netherlands
listing/paying agent
Royal Bank of Scotland N.V.
Gustav mahlerlaan 10
1082 PP Amsterdam
The Netherlands
www.SEcURItIESInFo.nl
192 FInAncIAl StAtEmEntS And othER InFoRmAtIon
CONTACTS
Contacts
Reed Elsevier Plc
1-3 Strand
London WC2N 5JR
united Kingdom
Tel: +44 (0)20 7930 7077
Fax: +44 (0)20 7166 5799
Auditors
deloitte LLP
2 New Street Square
London EC4A 3BZ
united Kingdom
Registrar
Equiniti Limited
Aspect house
Spencer Road
Lancing
West Sussex
BN99 6dA
united Kingdom
www.ShAREvIEw.co.Uk
Tel: 0871 384 2960
(calls charged at 8p per minute from a BT landline,
other telephony providers’ costs may vary)
Tel: +44 121 415 7047 (non-uK callers)
Reed Elsevier Plc and Reed Elsevier nv AdR depositary
BNY mellon (AdRs)
PO Box 358516
Pittsburgh PA15252-8516
uSA
www.AdRBnY.com
email: shrrelations@bnymellon.com
Tel: +1 888 269 2377
+1 201 680 6825 (outside the uS)
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
193
2012 financial calendar
16 February
24 April
24 April
25 April
25 April
26 April
27 April
30 April
21 may
29 may
26 July
8 August
10 August
31 August
7 September
8 november
Plc
nv
Plc
nv
nv
Plc
Plc
nv
Plc
nv
Plc
nv
Plc
nv
Plc
nv
Plc
nv
Plc
nv
Plc
nv
Plc
nv
Plc
nv
Announcement of Results for the year ended 31 december 2011
interim management Statement issued in relation to the 2012 financial year
Annual General meeting – Reed Elsevier NV, hotel Okura, Ferdinand Bolstraat 33, 1072 Lh Amsterdam
Annual General meeting – Reed Elsevier PLC, millennium hotel, Grosvenor Square, London W1K 2hP
Ex-dividend date – 2011 final dividend, Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shares and AdRs
Ex-dividend date – 2011 final dividend, Reed Elsevier NV ordinary shares and AdRs
Record date – 2011 final dividend, Reed Elsevier PLC ordinary shares and AdRs
Record date – 2011 final dividend, Reed Elsevier NV ordinary shares and AdRs
Payment date – 2011 final dividend, Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV ordinary shares
Payment date – 2011 final dividend, Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV AdRs
Announcement of interim Results for the six months to 30 June 2012
Ex-dividend date – 2012 interim dividend, Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV ordinary shares and AdRs
Record date – 2012 interim dividend, Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV ordinary shares and AdRs
Payment date – 2012 interim dividend, Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV ordinary shares
Payment date – 2012 interim dividend, Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV AdRs
interim management Statement issued in relation to the 2012 financial year
The following tables set out dividends paid (or proposed) in relation to the three financial years 2009–2011.
Final dividend for 2011*
interim dividend for 2011
Final dividend for 2010
interim dividend for 2010
Final dividend for 2009
interim dividend for 2009
per Plc ordinary share
per nv ordinary share
Payment date
15.90p
5.65p
15.00p
5.40p
15.00p
5.40p
€0.326
€0.110
€0.303
€0.109
€0.293
€0.107
21 may 2012
26 August 2011
17 may 2011
27 August 2010
21 may 2010
28 August 2009
*Proposed dividend, to be submitted for approval at the respective Annual General meetings of Reed Elsevier PLC and Reed Elsevier NV in April 2012.
Final dividend for 2011
interim dividend for 2011
Final dividend for 2010
interim dividend for 2010
Final dividend for 2009
interim dividend for 2009
per Plc AdR
**
$0.36860
$0.97236
$0.33480
$0.86010
$0.35164
per nv AdR
**
$0.26875
$0.73118
$0.23512
$0.62137
$0.26060
Payment date
29 may 2012
2 September 2011
24 may 2011
3 September 2010
28 may 2010
4 September 2009
**Payment will be determined using the appropriate £/uS$ and €/uS$ exchange rate on 21 may 2012.
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
194 FInAncIAl StAtEmEntS And othER InFoRmAtIon
PRiNCiPAL OPERATiNG LOCATiONS
Principal operating locations
Reed Elsevier
1-3 Strand
London WC2N 5JR, uK
Tel: +44 (0)20 7930 7077
Fax: +44 (0)20 7166 5799
Radarweg 29
1043 NX Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 (0)20 485 2222
Fax: +31 (0)20 485 2032
125 Park Avenue, 23rd Floor
New York, NY 10017, uSA
Tel: +1 212 309 8100
Fax: +1 212 309 8187
FOR FuRThER iNFORmATiON OR CONTACT
dETAiLS, PLEASE CONSuLT OuR WEBSiTE:
www.REEdElSEvIER.com
Elsevier
Radarweg 29
1043 NX Amsterdam
The Netherlands
www.ElSEvIER.com
The Boulevard, Langford Lane
Kidlington, Oxford OX5 1GB, uK
1600 John F. Kennedy Blvd
Suite 1800, Philadelphia
PA 19103, uSA
www.US.ElSEvIERhEAlth.com
3251 Riverport Lane
maryland heights, mO 63043, uSA
lexisnexis legal & Professional
125 Park Avenue, 23rd Floor
New York, NY 10017, uSA
www.lExISnExIS.com
9443 Springboro Pike
miamisburg, Oh 45342, uSA
halsbury house, 35 Chancery Lane
London WC2A 1EL, uK
www.lExISnExIS.co.Uk
lexisnexis Risk Solutions
1000 Alderman drive
Alpharetta, GA 30005, uSA
www.lExISnExIS.com/RISk/
Reed Exhibitions
Gateway house, 28 The Quadrant
Richmond, Surrey TW9 1dN, uK
www.REEdExPo.com
Reed Business Information
Quadrant house, The Quadrant
Sutton, Surrey Sm2 5AS, uK
www.REEdBUSInESS.co.Uk
Elsevier Reed Finance Bv
Radarweg 29
1043 NX Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 (0)20 485 2222
Fax: +31 (0)20 485 2032
Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011
195
Notes
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
i
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
196 FInAncIAl StAtEmEntS And othER InFoRmAtIon
NOTES
Notes
Reed Elsevier is a world leading provider
of professional information solutions.
We leverage deep customer understanding to
deliver demonstrably improved outcomes to our
professional customers.
We do this by combining content and data with
analytics and technology in global platforms,
sharing institutional skills, assets and resources
across Reed Elsevier.
Credits
designed and produced by
saslondon.com
Board photography by
Julian Calder
Printed by
Pureprint Group, ISO14001, FSC® certified and CarbonNeutral®
The paper used in the report contains 100% recycled content, of
which 100% is de-inked post-consumer waste. All of the pulp is
bleached using an elemental chlorine free process (ECF). Printed
in the UK by Pureprint using their alcofree® and pureprint®
environmental printing technology; vegetable inks were used
throughout. Pureprint is a CarbonNeutral® company. Both
manufacturing mill and printer are ISO14001 registered and are
Forest Stewardship Council® (FSC) chain-of-custody certified.
Contents
1
7
Overview
1 Chairman’s statement
2
4
2011 highlights
Chief Executive Officer’s
report
Business review
8 Reed Elsevier
10 Elsevier
14 LexisNexis Risk Solutions
LexisNexis Legal &
18
Professional
22 Reed Exhibitions
26
29 Corporate responsibility
Reed Business Information
39 Financial review
83
40
Chief Financial Officer’s
report
48 Principal risks
51 Governance
52 Board Directors
54
Chairman’s introduction
to corporate governance
Structure and corporate
governance
Report of the Nominations
Committee
Directors’ remuneration
report
Report of the Audit
Committees
55
62
63
80
Financial statements and
other information
84
Combined financial
statements
123 Summary combined financial
information in euros
137 Reed Elsevier PLC Annual
Report and Financial
Statements
161 Reed Elsevier NV Annual
Report and Financial
Statements
185 Additional information
for US investors
190 Shareholder information
194 Principal operating locations
Full report online
ThE REED ELSEVIER ANNUAL REPORTS AND FINANCIAL STATEmENTS 2011 ARE AVAILABLE TO VIEw ONLINE:
REPORTING.REEdElsEvIER.cOm/aR11
Forward looking statements
The Reed Elsevier Annual Reports and Financial Statements 2011 contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of
the US Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the US Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These statements are
subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results or outcomes to differ materially from those currently being
anticipated. The terms “estimate”, “project”, “plan”, “intend”, “expect”, “should be”, “will be”, “believe” and similar expressions identify
forward-looking statements. Factors which may cause future outcomes to differ from those foreseen in forward-looking statements
include, but are not limited to competitive factors in the industries in which Reed Elsevier operates; demand for Reed Elsevier’s products
and services; exchange rate fluctuations; general economic and business conditions; legislative, fiscal, tax and regulatory developments
and political risks; the availability of third party content and data; breaches of our data security systems and interruptions in our information
technology systems; changes in law and legal interpretations affecting Reed Elsevier’s intellectual property rights and other risks
referenced from time to time in the filings of Reed Elsevier with the US Securities and Exchange Commission.
1441_Reed_Covers_Final.indd 18
08/03/2012 19:34
Annual Reports and
Financial Statements
2011
A
n
n
u
a
l
i
R
e
p
o
r
t
s
a
n
d
F
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
s
2
0
1
1
www.reedelsevier.com
1441_Reed_Covers_Final.indd 18
08/03/2012 18:32