Research Frontiers Inc. Annual Report 2017

FY2017 Annual Report · Research Frontiers Inc.

Loading PDF…

(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:2)(cid:1)(cid:3)(cid:1)(cid:4)(cid:1)(cid:3)(cid:1)(cid:5)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:1)(cid:6)(cid:1)(cid:7)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:8)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:1)(cid:9)(cid:1)(cid:10)(cid:1)(cid:11)(cid:1)(cid:12)(cid:1)(cid:3)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:1)(cid:4)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:12)(cid:1)(cid:10)(cid:1)(cid:6)(cid:1)(cid:13)(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:14)(cid:1)(cid:15)(cid:1)(cid:16)(cid:1)7(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:5)(cid:1)(cid:10)(cid:1)(cid:10)(cid:1)(cid:18)(cid:1)(cid:5)(cid:1)(cid:19)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:1)(cid:3)(cid:1)(cid:20)(cid:1)(cid:9)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:1)(cid:11)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:9)(cid:1)(cid:10)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:8)(cid:1)(cid:9)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:1)(cid:21)(cid:1)(cid:1)(cid:16)(cid:1)(cid:15)(cid:1)(cid:22)(cid:1)(cid:23)(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)

(cid:14)(cid:1)(cid:15)(cid:1)(cid:16)(cid:1)7(cid:1)

(cid:1)

(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)

(cid:1)

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) of
THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017

Commission File Number 000-14893

RESEARCH FRONTIERS INCORPORATED
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

DELAWARE
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)

240 CROSSWAYS PARK DRIVE
WOODBURY, NEW YORK
(Address of principal executive offices)

11-2103466
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

11797-2033
(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (516) 364-1902

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Class
Common Stock, $0.0001 Par Value

Name of Exchange
on Which Registered
The NASDAQ Stock
Market

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes [ ] No [X]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes

[ ] No [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports),
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every
Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and
will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller
reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller
reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer [ ]

Accelerated filer [ ]

Non-accelerated filer [ ]

Smaller reporting company [X]

Emerging growth company [ ]

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period

for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes [ ] No [X]

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30,
2017 (the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter), computed based on the closing sale price
of $1.29 was $24,494,488. In making this computation, all direct and indirect shares known to be owned by directors and executive
officers of the Company and all direct and indirect shares known to be owned by other persons holding in excess of 5% of the Company’s
common stock have been deemed held by “affiliates” of the Company, and awards of restricted stock subject to vesting are assumed to
have been fully issued and outstanding. Nothing herein shall prejudice the right of the Company or any such person to deny that any
such director, executive officer, or stockholder is an “affiliate.”

On March 12, 2018, the registrant had 24,043,846 shares of Common Stock outstanding.

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

Forward-Looking Statements

PART I

Information included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K may contain forward-looking statements within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are not statements of
historical facts, but rather reflect our current expectations concerning future events and results. We generally use the
words “believes,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “likely,” “will” and similar expressions to identify
forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements, including those concerning our expectations, involve risks,
uncertainties and other factors, some of which are beyond our control, which may cause our actual results, performance
or achievements, or industry results, to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements
expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These risks, uncertainties and factors include, but are not limited
to, those factors set forth in this Annual Report on Form 10-K under “Item 1A. – Risk Factors” below. Except as required
by applicable law, including the securities laws of the United States, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or
revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. You are
cautioned not to unduly rely on such forward-looking statements when evaluating the information presented in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.

General:

As used herein, “we,” “us,” “our,” the “Company” or “Research Frontiers” means Research Frontiers Incorporated
unless otherwise indicated. Research Frontiers operates in a single business segment which is engaged in the development
and marketing of technology and devices to control the flow of light (see Note 1). We develop and license our patented
suspended particle device (“SPD-Smart”) light-control technology to other companies that manufacture and/or market the:
(i) SPD-Smart chemical emulsion, (ii) light-control film made from the chemical emulsion, (iii) the light-control panels
made by laminating the film, (iv) electronics to power end-products incorporating the film, or (v) lamination services for,
and the end-products themselves such as “smart” windows, skylights and sunroofs. Research Frontiers currently has over
40 companies that, in the aggregate, are licensed to primarily serve four major SPD-Smart application areas (aerospace,
architectural, automotive and marine products) in every country of the world. In addition, in 2013 we launched our
VariGuard business unit that markets and sells SPD-Smart products directly to customers for specialty uses such as the
protection of artwork and light-sensitive documents in museums and private collections.

The Company has entered into a number of license agreements covering its light control technology. During 2017,
four licensees accounted for 35%, 15%, 10% and 9%, respectively of fee income recognized during the year. During 2016
four licensees accounted for 30%, 27%, 15% and 7%, respectively of fee income recognized for the year. During 2015,
three licensees accounted for 33%, 15%, and 9%, respectively, of fee income recognized for the year. In addition, during
the year ended December 31, 2015, approximately 14% of revenues related to fees generated by a large architectural glass
project.

Research Frontiers was incorporated in New York in 1965 to continue early work that Dr. Edwin Land, founder
of Polaroid Corporation, and others had done in the area of light-control beginning in the 1930s. Research Frontiers was
reincorporated in Delaware in 1989. Since 1965, Research Frontiers has actively worked to develop and license its own
SPD technology, which it protects using patents, trade secrets and know-how. Although patent and trade secret protection
is not a guarantee of commercial success, Research Frontiers currently has 225 patents that have been issued worldwide.
In addition, the Company has current patent applications in the US and other countries that if granted, would add a
significant number of additional patents to its portfolio. The Company has and continues to devote significant resources to
develop, license and protect its intellectual property position.

SPD-Smart products use microscopic light-absorbing nanoparticles that are typically suspended in a film. These
particles align when an electrical voltage is applied, thus permitting light to pass through the film. Adjustment of the voltage
to the SPD film gives users the ability to quickly, precisely and consistently regulate the amount of light, glare and heat
passing through the window, skylight, sunroof, window shade or other SPD-Smart end-product. This SPD film can be
incorporated between two layers of glass or plastic, or combinations of both, to produce a laminate that has enhanced
energy efficiency, light-control and security performance properties.

Research Frontiers believes that the SPD industry is in the initial phase of growth. SPD light-control technology
may have commercial applicability in many products where variable light-control is desired. Some existing product
applications for SPD-Smart glass or plastic include the following:

● Automotive:

sunroofs, sunvisors, side windows and rear windows;

● Aerospace and marine:
windows, doors, partitions, sunvisors, and skylights.
● Architectural:

commercial and residential windows, doors, skylights, and partitions for new construction, replacement,
and retrofit applications;

In addition to the product applications listed above, SPD-SmartGlass technology may also offer potential benefits
in the development of new flat panel displays, light conservation panels, neonatal incubators, consumer electronics,
eyewear, self-dimming automotive rear-view mirrors and other reflective information displays. However, such products
need additional product design, engineering or testing before the commercial potential of such SPD-SmartGlass products
can be determined.

Some of our licensees consider the stage of development, product introduction strategies and timetables, and other
plans to be proprietary or secret. Unless required to disclose such information, the Company may limit its disclosure of
licensees’ activities until such licensees, or their customers, make their own public announcements of planned or actual
product launches.

Some of the early sales and uses of SPD technology were to low volume commercial installations and some have
involved concept and test installations by licensees and their customers. Recent progress with regard to market development
and commercialization activity has been the result of focused and active efforts by Research Frontiers and its key licensees
who have invested in product development and improvements, production facilities, increased production capacity,
durability, performance testing, quality control and assurance, and marketing programs.

Beginning in late 2011, higher volume sales of SPD products commenced with the launch by Daimler AG of the
Magic Sky Control™ all glass roof option on their Mercedes-Benz SLK (subsequently renamed SLC). In early 2012, sales
of the Magic Sky Control™ all glass roof option commenced on their Mercedes-Benz SL. In mid-2014, sales of the Magic
Sky Control™ all glass roof option commenced on the new S-Class Coupe with other Mercedes-Benz S-Class variants
began offering the Magic Sky Control™ all glass roof option in 2015 and 2016.

Research Frontiers believes that with the normal progression of product and manufacturing improvements, and as
licensees become more experienced at the lamination, fabrication and installation of SPD-Smart products for various
applications, the adoption rates for SPD-Smart products will grow and accelerate, which we expect will increase the stream
of royalty income for the Company. Research Frontiers believes the largest and most predictable near and intermediate
term market for its technology will be automotive glass.

As part of their marketing and branding programs, many of our licensees have developed their own trademarks
for SPD-Smart emulsion, film, and end-products and these are listed in their respective press releases, product brochures,
advertising and other promotional materials. Research Frontiers uses the following trademarks: SPD-Smart™, SPD-
SmartGlass™, VaryFast™, SPD-CleanTech™, SPD Clean Technology™, SmartGlass™, The View of the Future -
Everywhere you Look™, Powered by SPD™, Powered by SPD-CleanTech™, Powered by SPD Clean Technology™, SG
Enabled™, SPD Green and Clean™, SPD On-Board™, Speed Matters™, VariGuard™ and Visit SmartGlass.com - to
change your view of the world™.

In each of the last three fiscal years the Company devoted substantially all of its time to the development of one
class of products, namely SPD-Smart light-control technology, and therefore revenue analysis by class is not provided
herein. Information about our operations and those of our licensees is included below and in our financial statements and
notes thereto.

The Company does not believe that future sales will be seasonal in any material respect. The Company does not
currently directly manufacture products on its own but rather depends on activities of its licensees and vendors. Due to the
nature of the Company’s business operations and the fact that the Company is not presently a manufacturer, there is no
backlog of orders for the Company’s products.

The Company believes that compliance with federal, state and local provisions which have been enacted or
adopted regulating the discharge of materials into the environment, or otherwise relating to the protection of the
environment, will not have a material effect upon the capital expenditures, earnings and competitive position of the
Company. The Company has no material capital expenditures for environmental control facilities planned for the remainder
of its current fiscal year or its next succeeding fiscal year.

Employees:

On March 12, 2018, the Company had seven full-time employees, four of whom are technical personnel, and the
rest of whom perform legal, finance, marketing, investor relations, and administrative functions. Of these employees, two
have obtained doctorates in chemistry, one has a master’s degree in chemistry, and one has extensive industrial experience
in electronics and electrical engineering. Two employees also have additional postgraduate degrees in business
administration and one has a doctorate in jurisprudence. Also the Company’s suppliers and licensees have people on their
teams with advanced degrees in a number of areas relevant to the commercial development of products using the
Company’s technology. The success of the Company is dependent upon, among other things, the services of its senior
management, the loss of which could have a material adverse effect upon the prospects of the Company.

Smart Glass Industry Trends:

There are favorable converging global trends in the major near-term markets for smart glass and SPD-Smart
products. The potential for smart glass products is significant and is expected to attain economies of scale with increasing
high volume production. This increased production is also expected to bring down end product costs and expand market
opportunities.

In both public and private sectors across the world, there are substantial efforts targeted toward the promotion and
use of energy efficient smart glass materials, including those used in automobiles, windows and other architectural glazings,
aircraft and boats. Products using SPD-Smart technology continue to be exhibited at trade shows, conferences, and industry
events, with such products not only being exhibited by our licensees but also by their customers and by OEMs. While there
can be no assurance that these trends will continue, to the extent that they do continue, each is expected to have a beneficial
effect on future interest in SPD-Smart technology.

In September 2017, MarketsandMarkets issued Smart Glass Market by Technology (Suspended Particle Display,
Electrochromic, Liquid Crystal, Photochromic, Thermochromic), Application (Architecture, Transportation, Consumer
Electronics), and Geography - Global Forecast to 2023. This market research report concludes that the smart glass market
is expected to grow from USD $2.8 Billion in 2016 to reach USD $8.35 Billion by 2023, with a growth rate of 16.6%
between 2017 and 2023. The study concluded that:

● Key factors driving the growth of this market are the growing demand for smart glass in automobile
applications, strong government support through mandates and legislations for energy-efficient
construction, and optimal energy saving through smart glass applications.

● Suspended Particle Devices (SPD) technology is expected to grow at the highest growth rate during the
forecast period. Furthermore, the transportation market segment is expected to dominate the smart glass
market during the forecast period.

● A higher cost of smart glass is the major factor restraining the growth of the market. Manufacturers find
it difficult to quantify the return on investment to end users and, hence, its application has been mainly
across the high-end and luxury verticals. However, with the opening of large-volume manufacturing
facilities, the manufacturers are expected to achieve economy of scale, which, in turn, will lower the cost.
With the increasing volume of production, the cost of smart glass is estimated to reduce by 30%–40%.

Automotive Market:

In the automotive industry, global trends include the introduction of larger sunroofs and panoramic roof panels in

transportation vehicles, and a higher percentage of these vehicles having a sunroof or using more glass in the roof.

SPD-SmartGlass has also been shown in armored automotive glass applications, recreational vehicles, and a new
market is also beginning to develop for personalized custom conversions of automobiles for owners who wish to express
themselves through the design of the cars they own and/or drive.

Aircraft Market:

In the aircraft industry, there is a trend towards larger windows with more passenger control and functionality. In
the “transport category” (primarily large commercial passenger aircraft) segment, the world’s two largest aircraft
manufacturers are both promoting the size of the windows in new aircraft platforms already being delivered (e.g. Boeing
787 and Airbus A350). In the “general aviation” category (primarily business jets, private or chartered smaller aircraft) this
trend is true as well. For example, Gulfstream is promoting the size of the windows on their G650 platform, and Bombardier
highlights the size of the cabin window on the upcoming Global 7000 and 8000 platforms. Several OEMs either already
offer, or have announced their interest to include, electronically dimmable windows in their aircraft – including Boeing,
Airbus, Bombardier, Embraer, Textron-Beechcraft, HondaJet, Airbus Helicopter, Bell Helicopter, Dassault, Epic and One
Aviation.

Electronically dimmable windows for aircraft may use SPD technology, or may use other smart window
technologies such as liquid crystal or electrochromic technology. A window system using electrochromic technology was
introduced in the Boeing 787. There have been concerns raised that this aircraft’s electronically dimmable windows are
not dark enough for long haul flights, transmit too much heat into the cabin, and have a switching speed that is too slow.

The Company believes its SPD technology offers important performance advantages over other technologies
including faster, more uniform response time, superior heat-rejection when the aircraft is parked on the ramp, superior
acoustic insulation, an automated dimming system to continuously maintain a constant level of light in the cabin in real-
time, and weight-savings. Leading companies manufacturing electromechanical pleated window shades have products that
incorporate SPD-Smart windows into their designs, and Tier 1 suppliers of other cabin systems (e.g. cabin management
systems) are featuring SPD-Smart electronically dimmable windows in mockups.

SPD technology is also the only commercially available light-control smart window technology known to have
passed the stringent safety and durability tests required by the aviation industry and to have received a Supplemental Type
Certificate (STC) from the Federal Aviation Administration. Today, SPD-Smart electronically dimmable windows are
flying in 33 models of various aircraft including those used in commercial aviation, general aviation and military aviation.
SPD-Smart products have recently been selected by aircraft manufacturers as standard equipment on new production
platforms including the Honda Aircraft HondaJet, Textron-Beechcraft King Air 250, 350i and C90GTx, Epic Aircraft
E1000, and One Aviation Eclipse 700.

Architectural Market:

The architectural community is actively increasing the use of daylight harvesting, green building technologies and
building automation systems to more effectively capture and control natural light as part of energy reduction strategies to
offset cooling/heating costs and electricity used by artificial lighting. In addition to design, aesthetic and other benefits, the
expanded use of glass also supports a growing body of research which finds that the presence of and control over incoming
natural light improves an individual’s well-being and productivity. Products using SPD-Smart light-control technology –
sunroofs, windows, skylights, partitions and others – can play an important role in supporting these converging global
trends.

For architectural applications, various market forces and the distinctive features of SPD-SmartGlass are having a
positive influence on interest for SPD-Smart products. Many architects are specifying more glass in their designs to satisfy
building occupants’ desire for greater connectedness with the outside environment. In addition, there is increasing interest
in improving energy efficiency in both commercial and residential buildings. Various studies indicate that buildings in the
United States and Europe now account for an estimated 39-40% of total energy use and upwards of 70% or more of
electricity consumption. Many architects and building owners are striving for sustainable, “green” buildings that are highly
energy-efficient, reduce environmental impact, and improve occupant health and well-being. In addition, the design
community is increasingly interested in advanced daylighting systems in buildings that lower electrical lighting usage and
reduce heating and cooling loads. Because of this, the ability to control light, glare and heat in these building applications
is very important and advanced solutions often are needed to optimize operating efficiencies. SPD-Smart architectural
products instantly and precisely provide shading, glare control and heat management solutions for offices and homes,
especially when these products are available for new construction, replacement and retrofit projects. These products include
insulated glass units, single-panel retrofits, unusually shaped glazings, and products with advanced fabrications such as
those with ballistic- and blast-resistant capabilities.

In 2015, Research Frontiers’ patented SPD-SmartGlass technology was selected as the exclusive smart glass for
the USA Pavilion at the World’s Fair, Expo Milano 2015. The USA Pavilion featured 312 large panels of SPD-SmartGlass
manufactured under license from Research Frontiers by Isoclima S.p.A. Each panel measures approximately 1 meter by 3
meters, making the total surface area in the roof more than 10,000 square feet. This is the largest known installation of
smart glass in the world for a roof application and was seen by over 6 million people.

Marine Market:

In the marine application, where light-control needs are especially important, many yacht manufacturers currently
employ less than ideal glazing solutions as they try to satisfy various shading and solar control objectives. For example,
some report having to use as many as five different types of glass in a typical yacht to satisfy diverse glazing needs. SPD-
Smart marine products can reduce the number of different types of glass used in these yachts because of its increased
functionality, superior performance and versatility. SPD-Smart marine products provide an innovation that allows these
operators to manage incoming light, glare and heat while achieving privacy or maintaining one’s view as desired.

Historical Background and Recent Developments:

SPD-Smart Film Production:

An important material used in SPD-Smart end-products is SPD light-control film that varies the tint of glass or
plastic. In early 2007, our licensee Hitachi Chemical began producing their initial SPD-Smart light-control film on their
first factory line. During the second half of 2009, Hitachi Chemical announced that they had begun mass production on
their new, larger capacity production line and expanded their annual production capacity to 400,000 square meters (over
4.3 million square feet).

Hitachi Chemical’s production line is dedicated exclusively to the production of SPD-Smart film. In July 2009,
Hitachi Chemical launched its website dedicated to its SPD-Smart light control film and during 2009, Hitachi Chemical
outlined in its press releases and public presentations that it plans to “accelerate the use of SPD film, which holds significant
potential for growth” and noted that “SPD film is positioned as one of the key emerging products promoted by Hitachi
Chemical to become a future leading product for the company.”

Customers for Hitachi Chemical’s SPD-Smart film are end-product licensees of Research Frontiers. These
licensees receive the film, laminate it between glass or plastic substrates, and then fabricate end-products which are sold
into various industries. Most end-product licensees pay Research Frontiers a royalty on the sale of these end-products that
typically range from 10-15%.

Hitachi Chemical expanded its SPD film product portfolio by initiating commercial production of a “lighter”
version of its film. Both the SPD “dark” and “light” versions of the films provide a high range of visible light transmission.
The best-selling SPD “dark” film has a range of approximately 0.5% to 55.0%. This leads to contrast ratios (the ratio of
clear to dark light transmission) of up to 110:1. The commercialization of both “dark” and “light” versions of SPD-film
provides greater design and performance options for end-product applications.

In December 2014, Research Frontiers was granted a patent relating to the production of SPD-films with even

higher light and dark transmission states than currently are available commercially.

Other companies are currently licensed by Research Frontiers to sell SPD-Smart light-control film to other
licensees of Research Frontiers. None of these other companies has yet announced commercial SPD film products for sale.

SPD-Smart Automotive Products:

Research Frontiers and its licensees are currently working with multiple automotive manufacturers to introduce
SPD-Smart windows, sunroofs and roof systems on both concept and production vehicles. Research Frontiers’ end-product
licensees in this sector include: American Glass Products, Asahi Glass, Custom Glass, Daimler AG, DuPont, Hanamac,
Isoclima, Pilkington Glass, Pittsburgh Glass Works, Saint-Gobain Vision Systems, Tint-It JSC and Advnanotech. The
Company’s automotive glass licensees account for the majority of all glass produced for the automotive market throughout
the world.

Automotive OEMs:

In 2011, Daimler AG began using SPD-SmartGlass technology in its Magic Sky Control™ panoramic glass roof
as an option on its new Mercedes-Benz 2012 SLK. In 2012, Daimler AG began offering its Magic Sky Control™ panoramic
glass roof as an option on its new Mercedes-Benz 2013 SL. These SPD products allow drivers and passengers to change
the tint of the car roof from dark to clear quickly with a touch of a button. The SLK and SL are the first large-scale series
production vehicles to offer SPD-SmartGlass. The Research Frontiers licensees involved with the production of the Magic
Sky Control™ roof for the SLK and SL include Hitachi Chemical, which manufactures the SPD-Smart light-control film
in Japan. Automotive glass companies Nippon Sheet Glass in Japan and its subsidiary, Pilkington, in the UK and Germany
then process and laminates Hitachi’s SPD film into the glass for the Magic Sky Control™ roof.

In late 2014, Daimler AG began offering its Magic Sky Control™ as an option on the new Mercedes-Benz S-
Class Coupe. In 2015 other S-Class variants (i.e. Standard Wheel base W222, Long Wheel Base V222, Maybach S600
X222 and the Maybach Pullman Limousine) began offering Magic Sky Control™ as an option. The all-new Mercedes-
Benz S-Class is the third large-scale serial production vehicle to offer Magic Sky Control™ using SPD-Smart technology.
The Research Frontiers licensees involved with the production of the Magic Sky Control™ roof for the S-Class include
Hitachi Chemical, which manufactures the SPD-Smart light-control film and Asahi Glass Corporation which then process
and laminates Hitachi’s SPD film into the glass for the Magic Sky Control™ roof.

The S-Class Coupe offers the largest panoramic Magic Sky Control™ roof ever put into serial production. The
surface area of the panoramic roof using SPD-SmartGlass technology on the S-Class is approximately three times the size
of the roof glass used on the current SLC and SL roadster. With the addition (announced in August 2017) of the new 2018
S450 and S450 4MATIC S-Class Sedans, a total of 14 Mercedes-Benz model variants now offer this remarkable panoramic
smart glass roof:

● S 450 S-Class Sedan
● S 450 4MATIC S-Class Sedan
● S 560 4MATIC S-Class Sedan
● AMG S 63 S-Class Sedan
● Mercedes-Maybach S 560 4MATIC
● S550 4MATIC S-Class Coupe
● AMG S63 S-Class Coupe
● AMG S65 S-Class Coupe
● SLC 300 Roadster
● AMG SLC 43 Roadster
● SL 450 Roadster
● SL 550 Roadster
● AMG SL63 Roadster
● AMG SL65 Roadster (Standard Equipment)

A key factor in the broad adoption of SPD technology in various automotive windows is its cost. Typically, the
cost for new technology products decrease as production volumes increase. The price per square foot of SPD-SmartGlass
reported by our licensees has gone down over time in the automotive market. Royalties from the Magic Sky Control
panoramic roofs for the S-Class vehicles are generally between $150-250/car. Royalties from the Magic Sky Control roofs
for the SLC and SL vehicles are between $100-150/car. The roofs on the S-Class is approximately two to three times the
surface area of the roofs on the SLC and SL vehicles.

Research Frontiers believes that the addition of the S-Class car model is also significant since it applies our SPD-
Smart light-control technology to the broader class of vehicles by moving beyond roadsters to coupes and passenger sedans.
Historically, since its debut over 40 years ago, the S-Class represents the premier platform to introduce new technologies
to the customer, which in many cases expand to the other less expensive model lines within the Mercedes-Benz brand.

In November 2015 at the Los Angeles Auto Show, Mercedes-Benz launched a refreshed Mercedes-Benz SL. The
press release from Mercedes-Benz it stated, “Another feature which has been retained is the unique optional extra MAGIC
SKY CONTROL: when closed, the panoramic vario-roof automatically changes from dark to transparent or vice-versa
within just a few seconds.” The MAGIC SKY CONTROL feature is a carry-over from the previous model. Other new
features include a new front end, new headlamps, more powerful engines, a new transmission, among many others.

In January 2016 at the North American International Auto Show in Detroit, Mercedes-Benz premiered the new
Mercedes-Benz SLC, which will be available in the spring of 2016. The press release from Mercedes-Benz when the SLC
was first announced stated, “A feature that continues to be unique to the SLC is the panoramic vario-roof with Magic Sky
Control – this glass roof is lightened or darkened at the touch of a button. This means that it provides an open-air feeling
at any time, but when required gives welcome shade under a hot sun.” The Magic Sky Control feature, using Research
Frontiers SPD-SmartGlass technology, is a carry-over from the SLC’s predecessor model, the SLK roadster.

Other automakers continue to develop and evaluate the use of SPD technology in their windows systems. Such

window systems include sunroofs, side-windows, rear-windows and front-window visors.

Some automakers and their suppliers have incorporated SPD-SmartGlass in concept vehicles, with some of these

concept vehicles being exhibited at major auto shows:

●

January 2018:

A number of different companies showcased SPD-Smart products at CES 2018. In the automotive industry, Fisker
debuted its new Fisker E-Motion with a unique and innovative four-segment SPD SmartGlass roof. In addition to use
in its large curved panoramic roof, Fisker says that it plans to offer SPD-SmartGlass technology on the side windows
of this new electric vehicle.

Continental Corporation (“Continental”) also showcased their Intelligent Glass Control system using SPD technology
at CES 2018 to demonstrate how it makes cars safer, more private and comfortable, lighter and more energy-efficient.

●

January 2017:

Corning introduced a concept car that features an SPD-SmartGlass panoramic roof and rear glass at the 2017 Consumer
Electronics Show. This large roof and curved rear glass is made using SPD-SmartGlass light-control film laminated
between Corning’s Gorilla® Glass, a special chemically-strengthened thin and lightweight glass.

At the 2017 Consumer Electronics Show, Continental Corporation (“Continental”) showcased an advanced version of
its SPD-equipped vehicle that it originally showcased at the 2016 Consumer Electronics Show. This vehicle has
enhanced and more sophisticated electronics, Continental indicated that its Intelligent Glass Control system increases
passenger comfort and lowers CO2 emissions by keeping the interior of the vehicle cooler. As a result, smaller, more
efficient and lighter air conditioning units could be used. Calculations showed a reduction in CO2 emissions of four
grams per kilometer. Continental also estimates that their Intelligent Glass Control system can increase the driving
range of electric vehicles by 5.5%

●

January 2016:

Continental Corporation showcased its “Intelligent Glass Control” system on a demonstration vehicle at a special event
at the Consumer Electronics Show (CES) in Las Vegas. This vehicle, a Ford Mondeo station wagon, used SPD-
SmartGlass technology to enable the glass in all eleven side and rear windows and in the top sunvisor portion of the
windshield to change its transparency and darken instantly through electric control signals.

● March 2015:

The Lincoln Motor Company, the luxury automotive brand of the Ford Motor Company, introduced the Lincoln
Continental Concept car using an SPD-SmartGlass electronically tinting sunroof. This Lincoln Continental Concept
car featuring SPD-SmartGlass also made its Asian debut at Auto Shanghai in April 2015.

● September 2012:

BMW debut at the Paris Motor Show its new BMW Concept Active Tourer. This vehicle’s entire composite glass roof

uses patented SPD-SmartGlass technology.

● March 2012:

Mercedes-Benz debuted at the Geneva International Motor Show its public evaluation of the Limited Edition Viano
Pearl. This vehicle displays the capabilities and conceptual use of SPD-SmartGlass on the side glass of vehicles from
Mercedes-Benz.

● December 2011:

Toyota debuted its FS Hybrid Concept at the 2011 Tokyo Motor Show in Tokyo, Japan. The FS Hybrid Concept
demonstrated the use of SPD-Smart™ technology in side glass.

● September 2011:

Audi debuted its A2 concept car at the Frankfurt International Auto Show in Frankfurt, Germany. The A2 is an electric-

powered passenger car equipped with a large SPD-Smart™ panoramic glass roof.

Automotive Aftermarket:

While the highest volume market for which SPD-Smart technology is being developed is new car production by
the world’s automakers, the aftermarket upgrade market also presents near-term opportunities in the automotive market.
Research Frontiers licensee American Glass Products (AGP) is offering its Vario Plus Sky SPD-SmartGlass to the
automotive aftermarket. In May of 2017 Hanamac International Ltd. acquired a license from Research Frontiers Inc. to
produce and sell SPD-SmartGlass automotive windows for the South Korean aftermarket. In March of 2013 Research
Frontiers announced that it had added two new licensees, Tint-It JSC and Advnanotech, both of whom are targeting the
automotive aftermarket in Russia.

Recreational Vehicles//Motor Homes:

● May 2017:

At Caravan Salon in Dusseldorf, Germany, premium recreational vehicle supplier Lippert Components, and Knaus, a
leading manufacturer of leisure vehicles in Europe, both featured the world premiere of dimmable windows using
SPD-SmartGlass technology. These electronically dimmable smart windows, which dramatically improve the
recreational vehicle passenger experience, were supplied by Vision Systems, a licensee of Research Frontiers.

● September 2014:

Global Caravan Technologies, Inc. unveiled the CR-1 Carbon which features the MagicView™ roof and
MagicView™ windshield with SPD-SmartGlass. This special glass which totals 28 square feet, was jointly developed
with Research Frontiers’ licensee Vision Systems. SPD nanotechnology on this vehicle allows infinitely variable
control of privacy between blackout and clear and can be controlled by any smart-phone or other smart-devices. In
addition to controlling the level of light and glare coming into the RV, the MagicView™ SPD-SmartGlass on RVs
offers many other advantages. This technology provides unsurpassed thermal insulation: SPD-SmartGlass
substantially rejects solar heat from entering RVs through windows. The SPD-SmartGlass achieves its maximum dark
state when the RV is parked/turned off and no power is consumed.

●

January 2012:

Vision Systems announced that Notin, manufacturer of motorhomes and campers, selected Visions Systems’ Nuance
brand of SPD-SmartGlass for the skylight of Notin’s Angara luxury motorhome. In October 2013 at Busworld 2013,
Vision Systems showcased a new sun visor using SPD-Smart light-control film technology and a light sensor to
automatically and dynamically adjust the sun visor to deal with changing light and glare conditions. Vision Systems
indicated that they have been working for almost two years with a major automotive OEM to test the ease of
installation, reliability, design and performance of their new sun visor in real world conditions. They further indicated
that customer reaction regarding the effectiveness and ease of use of this product has been excellent. The fact that this
feature can be installed in the aftermarket should bring these benefits to a wider range of drivers.

Rail Transport:

● September 2017:

Vision Systems announced to the press in September 2017 that it had just signed contract to supply SPD-Smart Nuance
windows for a new proposed special Shinkansen bullet train which will be put in service for the 2020 Tokyo Olympics.

● May 2017:

AGC Asahi Glass announced its light control glass, WONDERLITETM, was adopted for JR East luxury sleeper train,
Train Suite Shiki-shima (“Shiki-shima”), which began service on May 1. JR East’s luxury sleeper train Shiki-shima,
conceptualized as a train for ‘enjoying changes in time and space’, has been designed with individualized themes for
each compartment. Of particular note, the front carriage, containing a special area for enjoying panoramic views of
Japan’s landscape, has been outfitted with WONDERLITETM light control glass, which makes it possible to adjust
passing sunlight simply with a switch.

● September 2016:

Vision Systems and their customers and strategic partners, exhibited many different types of SPD-Smart products at

InnoTrans 2016. Products included:

(a) A full-scale train cabin mockup equipped with many SPD-Smart passenger windows

(b) SPD-Smart windows with integrated transparent information displays

(d) SPD-Smart windows with multi-zone switching capabilities

(e) Train passenger SPD-Smart windows

(f) Aftermarket driver cabin SPD-Smart windows

● September 2014:

In September 2014, Poma (a leading supplier of cable transport systems) showcased at Innotrans 2014 its Cabine H2
cable car. The windows in this cable transport vehicle used Research Frontiers licensee Vision Systems’ “Nuance”
SPD solution. Innotrans 2014 is the largest international trade fair for rail transport technology with over 160,000
visitors and is held every two years in Berlin, Germany. At this fair Bombardier, featured their “FLEXITY 2” tram
platform using an electronically dimmable window produced by Vision Systems. In addition, AGC, one of the largest
producers of flat glass in the world, featured its “WONDERLITE” SPD-SmartGlass train window.

Automotive Armored Glass Market:

Within the automotive market, a potentially additional sector is the armored glass market. Armored glass
(sometimes referred to as “transparent armor” and “bullet-resistant glass”) encompasses the military, non-military
government, and civilian markets. In addition, SPD-Smart technology in this market not only provides the benefits of light-
control and UV blockage, it also enhances security by introducing darker tints and privacy. A number of the Company’s
licensees including American Glass Products, GKN, Isoclima and Pittsburgh Glass Works are recognized industry leaders
in the armored glass market.

SPD-Smart Aircraft Products:

Five aircraft manufacturers have announced that they have selected SPD-Smart dimmable window products as

standard or optional equipment for their production aircraft:

● Honda Aircraft Company:

The new HondaJet, with first delivery in December 2015, comes with SPD-Smart electronically dimmable windows
as standard equipment on all passenger windows.

● Textron-Beechcraft has SPD-Smart electronically dimmable windows as standard equipment on all models of its King

Air aircraft:

● The King Air 250, with first delivery during 2015

● The King Air 350i, with first delivery during 2015

● The King Air C90GTx, with first deliveries during the first quarter of 2016

● ONE Aviation announced the selection of SPD-Smart electronically dimmable windows for its upcoming Eclipse 700

platform.

● Epic Aircraft has selected SPD-Smart electronically dimmable windows for its upcoming Epic E1000 aircraft.

● Dassault Aviation:

The Falcon 5X was scheduled to come with SPD-Smart electronically dimmable skylights as standard equipment.
Subsequently, however, Dassault announced in December 2017 that they were terminating the Falcon 5X program and
announced the launch of a new Falcon program featuring the same cross section as the Falcon 5X. This aircraft is
scheduled to enter into service in 2022.

Other aircraft manufacturers and their suppliers continue to develop and evaluate the use of SPD technology in their
windows systems. Aircraft manufacturers have incorporated SPD-Smart electronically dimmable windows in
mockups, with some of these mockups being exhibited at major aviation shows:

● October 2017:

PPG Aerospace, in partnership with Vision Systems, launched a new product at the National Business Aviation
Association Convention and Exhibition in Las Vegas, Nevada. Nuance V2 Ultra Clear is a new product responding to
the industry requests for aircraft cabin shading systems that allow for brighter cabin interiors, while providing for more
effective shading. This Electronically Dimmable Window (EDW) solution uses patented SPD-Smart light control
technology developed by Research Frontiers.

●

July 2017:

ONE Aviation announced the selection of the ALTEOS electronically dimmable window (EDW) by PPG for its new
Eclipse 700 aircraft. The Eclipse 700 aircraft is an upgraded version of their Eclipse 500/550. The Alteos EDW utilizes
the NUANCE V2 shading product by Vision Systems that uses SPD-Smart light-control technology from Research
Frontiers. As ONE Aviation stated in the announcement, “A priority at ONE Aviation is to maximize ease of use and
passenger comfort. The PPG ALTEOS system provides both with simple and effective control of window shading.”

● May 2017:

Vision Systems, and PPG Aerospace, announced that they have reached a commercial agreement to work together on
developing new applications utilizing Vision Systems’ electronically dimmable window (EDW) shading solutions for
aircraft. These solutions use Research Frontiers’ SPD-Smart EDW technology and also combine the considerable
experience that both PPG Aerospace and Vision Systems have in supplying the aircraft industry with EDW systems.
As stated in their press release, “The agreement provides a framework for PPG and Vision Systems to pursue
opportunities in commercial, regional, military and general aviation applications that capitalize on each company’s
expertise.”

● October 2016:

At the MRO Europe conference Fokker Services, a division of GKN Aerospace, launched “Element EDW,” a new
electronically dimmable window system for commercial airliners. Developed in collaboration with Research Frontiers
licensee InspecTech Aero Service, this “smart transparency” controls and manages both beneficial and undesirable
outside elements coming into aircraft cabins through passenger windows.

Vision Systems exhibited SPD-Smart electronically dimmable windows (EDWs) at Aircraft Interiors Expo Asia and
at the National Business Aviation Association (NBAA) Business Aviation Convention & Exhibition. These products
improve the airline passenger experience by controlling light, glare, heat and noise entering the cabin.

● May 2016:

Easier SPD-Smart electronically dimmable window (EDW) control switches from InspecTech Aero Service were
featured at the EBACE aircraft show on the newly redesigned King Air 350i and 250 that were on display by Textron-
Beechcraft. Also at EBACE it was reported that the King Air C90GTx (the third King Air to offer SPD-Smart EDWs
as standard equipment) has received FAA certification, Textron highlighted the improved EDWs on their newly
redesigned aircraft as an important cabin enhancement.

Vision Systems debuted an Acti-Vision interactive aircraft window at the EBACE aircraft show that not only dims,
but brings the passenger important information such as flight status, moving map, satellite imagery, and even tourist
information about what the passenger is looking at out the window via a transparent video touchscreen built into the
window.

● April 2016:

Vision Systems introduced a solution for the light and glare issues commonly experienced in aircraft cockpits at the
Aircraft Interiors Expo. Vision Systems’ Nuance Smart Shell, using Research Frontiers SPD-Smart EDW technology,
is designed for lateral cockpit windows, which account for a large percentage of light and glare entering cockpits, and
are extremely difficult to shade. The Nuance Smart Shell EDW covers the entire window surface area and brings
dynamic solar control to aircraft cockpits – providing automated management of intense high-altitude light and glare,
and protection from harmful UV radiation.

● April 2015:

Vision Systems demonstrated its Nuance Touchless SPD-Smart EDW at the 2015 Aircraft Interiors Expo in Hamburg,
Germany. The new system allows passengers to use gestures, much like those used to operate a smart phone, to control
the tint of their aircraft windows, but without ever having to touch the window or any other aircraft interior component.

Isoclima showcased its CromaLite brand of SPD-Smart electronically dimmable windows at the Aircraft Interiors
Expo in Hamburg, Germany.

● March 2015:

Vision Systems unveiled its SPD-Smart Opti-Visor electronically dimmable sun visor for the aircraft market at the
Helicopter Association International Heli-Expo in Orlando, Florida.

● December 2014:

At the 2014 MEBA show in Dubai, U.A.E., Vision Systems unveiled a new generation of its Energia photovoltaic
autonomous SPD-Smart dimmable window – the new product is capable of producing more energy than the prior
generation.

● October 2014:

Epic Aircraft featured SPD-Smart windows in the mock-up of their upcoming E1000 aircraft. The mock-up was
unveiled at 2014 NBAA in Orlando, Florida.

● May 2014:

At the 2014 EBACE show in Geneva, Switzerland, Vision Systems unveiled a new SPD-Smart dimmable window
product that offers passengers the ability to independently control the tint of different “zones” within the same window.
At the same show, Vision Systems announced an improvement in the optical performance of its Nuance SPD-Smart
dimmable windows – a product offering wider amplitude between clear and dark.

● April 2014:

BAE Systems featured SPD-Smart electronically dimmable windows in their cabin management system mock-up at
the 2014 Hamburg Airshow. The windows can be controlled by the BAE system.

Vaupell featured an SPD-Smart electronically dimmable window in their commercial airliner window assembly at the
2014 Hamburg Airshow.

● October 2013:

At the 2013 AIX Americas show, Vision Systems’ strategic partner Vaupell announced they are offering the industry
a complete SPD-Smart light-control window system – Vision Systems’ SPD-Smart Noctis window and control system,
integrated with Vaupell’s window assembly. This product offering was showcased at Vaupell’s AIX Americas booth.
Vision Systems and Vaupell entered into a strategic partnership to develop and offer SPD-Smart Noctis and Nuance
windows to OEMs, including Vaupell’s longstanding customer Boeing.

At the 2013 NBAA, Vision Systems unveiled Energia – the world’s first self-powered dimmable window for aircraft
cabins. Energia adds the many practical, technical, and financial benefits of solar power to the instant switching speed,
wide range of light transmission, and relief from light, glare and heat that SPD-Smart aircraft windows already provide.
Energia operates without using the aircraft’s electrical system because it integrates a transparent photovoltaic layer
that is capable of producing its own energy – from the sun, or from artificial light sources. Energia facilitates the
installation of dimmable windows on new production and aftermarket aircraft. It is completely independent of the
cabin’s wiring, and no modifications to the aircraft’s existing electrical system are required. Energia was developed in
collaboration with Sunpartner Technologies, Vision Systems partner and the inventor and manufacturer of the
transparent photovoltaic panel. In March 2014, Vision Systems announced that Energia had been selected as a finalist
in the prestigious 2014 Crystal Cabin Award.

In a press release at the 2013 NBAA in Las Vegas, GKN stated: “In addition to the Global 7000/8000, the aircraft
transparencies operation equips the Beechcraft KingAir, the Lear 35/45 and 60 – and the complete Embraer aircraft
family. The company’s latest passenger windows are the largest and most effective on the market and GKN Aerospace
is developing new dimmable cabin management technology that will include full cabin blackout – providing
passengers with new levels of comfort and environmental control during their journey.”

●

June 2013

At the Paris Air Show, Vision Systems announced it will open its first-ever U.S. SPD-SmartGlass factory, investing
nearly $1.2 million in capital expenditures to serve customers with strong U.S. operations. The new factory was
highlighted by Florida Governor Rick Scott and Vision Systems President and CEO Carl Putman, with Research
Frontiers President and CEO Joseph M. Harary and others in attendance for this special announcement. This
announcement of a further expansion to the United States indicates an acceleration of existing and projected business
in North and South America where major aircraft OEMs and customers of Vision Systems are located, including
HondaJet and Gulfstream.

● May 2013:

Eurocopter featured SPD-Smart windows, and SPD-Smart cabin partitions, in the mock-up of their EC175 helicopter.
The mock-up was unveiled at EBACE 2013 in Geneva, Switzerland.

● April 2013:

Vision Systems debuted its new SPD-Smart window with integrated electronics and controls directly on the window
at the 2013 Hamburg Air Show. Developed with strategic partner Vaupell, a world leader in the production of aircraft
interior subassemblies for commercial aerospace applications, it became the first dimmable window with integrated
electronics and control panel directly on the aesthetically attractive window reveal.

● October 2012:

Honda Aircraft Company featured HondaJet SPD-Smart cabin windows at the 2012 National Business Aviation
Association (NBAA) Annual Meeting & Convention. The HondaJet’s passenger windows will use SPD technology as
standard equipment. SPD-Smart Nuance windows for the HondaJet went into production at Vision Systems’ new
Melbourne, Florida factory.

InspecTech announced enhancements to its electronics architecture used to control their iShade to enable the SPD-
Smart electronically dimmable windows to switch to their clearest state in the event of a power loss – that was a request
made by certain OEMs. InspecTech’s iShades now offer “the best of both worlds” - when unpowered on the ramp, the
windows automatically switch to their darkest, maximum heat-rejecting state, and when in the air, they instantly switch
to the clear state in the event of a loss of power.

InspecTech announced improvements to its iShade iQ including a higher light transmission, greater contrast ratio,
unprecedented optical clarity, superior acoustic and thermal insulation properties, and lighter weight.

● March 2012:

At the 2012 Aircraft Interiors Expo in Hamburg, Germany, Isoclima S.p.A. announced that Isoclima’s CromaLite
brand of SPD-Smart aerospace windows made their world premier. CromaLite is Isoclima’s SPD-Smart solar control
glazing product and enables users to efficiently control the transmitted solar radiation in both the visible and the solar
range. Dr. Alberto Bertolini, Executive Director of Isoclima, commented: “Our CromaLite brand of SPD-Smart
window offers many valuable light-control benefits: instant shading, glare control, UV rejection, the desire for
passenger comfort, and keeping aircraft cool when they are on the ground. We are very excited by the reactions we
have received from OEMs and cabin designers who are here at the Aircraft Interiors Expo, and are excited about our
growing portfolio of SPD-Smart CromaLite solutions for the transportation and architectural markets.”

Vision Systems announced that the company has invested over $750,000 to expand its existing factory in France to
add a production facility dedicated to the manufacture of its SPD-Smart Nuance and Noctis aerospace and
transportation windows and cabin dividers.

● November 2011:

Bombardier Aerospace featured SPD-Smart aircraft windows in their CSeries aircraft cabin mock-up at the 2011 Dubai
Airshow, equipping the business class windows in its mock-up with SPD-Smart aerospace windows.

Vision Systems exhibited its Nuance and Noctis brands of SPD-Smart aircraft cabin windows at the Dubai Airshow
in Dubai, United Arab Emirates. Nuance and Noctis SPD-Smart aerospace windows offer instant and precise light-
control at every level which provides OEMs and private aircraft owners a solar protection solution that enhances flying
comfort and supports fuel efficiency. These electronically dimmable aircraft and helicopter window shades and cabin
dividers are impact-resistant, completely silent, available in flat and curved surfaces, and can be controlled by the
cabin management system or by passengers. Vision Systems’ Noctis SPD-Smart product line offers enhanced blackout
solar protection and complete privacy. Also at the November 2011 Dubai Airshow, Vision Systems announced that
Bombardier Aerospace was featuring Vision Systems’ SPD-Smart aircraft windows in Bombardier’s CSeries aircraft
cabin mock-up. Bombardier equipped the business class windows in its mock-up with Vision Systems’ SPD-Smart
Noctis aerospace windows. Developed for the 100- to 149-seat market segment, the CSeries family of aircraft is
Bombardier’s all new mainline transport solution.

● April 2011:

InspecTech announced a new model of its SPD-Smart iShade window, branded iShade iQ. This model, in addition to
the light, glare and heat control, also reduces noise levels in the cabin.

●

January 2011:

Research Frontiers and GKN Aerospace Transparency Systems publicly announced the expansion of the scope of the
former license agreement to include the sale of SPD-Smart windows, window shades, interior partitions, cabin dividers
and other products for aircraft. The earlier license agreement with GKN focused on SPD-Smart products for armored
transportation applications. GKN Aerospace is the world-leading supplier of cockpit transparencies and passenger
cabin windows.

Key performance requirements for aircraft light-control windows:

● Level of darkness:

Solar radiation onboard aircraft is extreme, and requires a dimmable window that creates an environment dark enough
for passengers to sleep, even during daylight hours. Research Frontiers licensees now offer SPD-Smart windows that
can be set to block over 99.96% of incoming light, to meet the needs of OEMs and their customers.

● Switching speed:

Whenever a passenger wants relief from glare, SPD-Smart aircraft windows offer immediate response. Due to instant
switching, an infinite number of light-transmission states can be selected by the passenger or flight crew, from clear
to blackout, and any level of view-preserving tint in between.

● Heat-blocking:

Aircraft cabins can become hot when the aircraft is parked because of solar heat streaming through windows. The
result is an uncomfortably warm cabin upon boarding or the need to use jet fuel or auxiliary power units before
boarding to cool down the cabin. SPD-Smart aircraft windows automatically switch to their maximum heat-blocking
state, even when the aircraft is parked unpowered, and the cabin remains cool.

Additional challenges stated by OEMs and their customers that have been successfully met by SPD-Smart

dimmable aircraft windows include:

● Noise-blocking: the ability to reduce the amount of noise transmitted through windows
● Curved shapes: the ability to offer curved windows to meet interior design needs
● Weight-reduction: the ability to fabricate dimmable windows using lightweight plastics
● FAA certification: the ability to demonstrate full compliance with all FAA requirements

SPD-Smart Architectural Products:

Research Frontiers and its licensees are currently working with multiple architectural customers to introduce SPD-
Smart products including windows, skylights, partitions and doors. The architectural markets for these products are highly
fragmented and in general have a high sensitivity to price. In the near term, the Company expects SPD-SmartGlass products
primarily will be commercialized in specialty applications and/or sectors that value its distinctive performance attributes
including fast switching speed regardless of window size, a very wide range of visible light transmission, infinite light-
control between its dark and clear states, and availability in unusual shapes and sizes. Research Frontiers’ end-product
licensees in this sector include: Advnanotech (ADV), American Glass Products (AGP), Asahi Glass, Cricursa Cristales
Curvados, ID Research Pty Ltd. (“i-Glass”), Innovative Glass, LTI SmartGlass, NSG UMU Products Co., Ltd Prelco,
Isoclima, Traco (a business unit of Alcoa), Mecanica de Vidros Industria E Comercio (“MDV”), and Tint-It JSC.

In January 2017, Research Frontiers and NSG UMU Products Co., Ltd. announced that UMU Products has
acquired a license from Research Frontiers Inc. to produce and sell SPD-SmartGlass architectural intelligent products
throughout the United States, Canada, Mexico, Japan, the People’s Republic of China and Taiwan. The non-exclusive
license grants UMU Products, a subsidiary of world-leading glass manufacturer Nippon Sheet Glass, the right to
manufacture and sell SPD-SmartGlass products including windows, doors, solar shading screens, curtainwalls, skylights
and other intelligent smart glass architectural products.

In September 2016, Smartglass International announced that its Solar SmartGlass brand of SPD-SmartGlass has
been selected for both new construction and retrofit projects. An example of a retrofit project is the University of
Edinburgh’s historic McEwan Hall. The interior of this hall, built in 1897, is being refurbished. In an article on the
Smartglass International website, the company indicates that its Solar SmartGlass “…will be retrofitted to the internal
building walls to protect the beautiful paintings and features for many more years to come. The glass will increase the
functionality of the space by allowing instant control over the amount of light entering the hall. Smartglass International
will create bespoke solar switchable panels that will be fitted inside each of the 13 circular oculi, each more than 2 metres
in diameter.”

At its annual stockholders meeting in June 2015, Research Frontiers announced a small strategic investment in
Zuli Inc. a manufacturer of smartplugs. At this meeting, Joseph Harary demonstrated how the Zuli Smartplug integrates
with SPD SmartGlass products. Mr. Harary indicated that “Using a Zuli Smartplug, you can walk into a room with your
smartphone, and have the lights automatically turn on, temperature adjust, and the glass in your windows instantly go from
an energy-saving dark tint, to clear so you can see the magnificent views outside your home. Now, walk into another room
and have those lights and windows adjust too, while the Zuli Smartplug automatically shuts off your devices in the room
you left to save energy.”

In March 2015, it was announced that Research Frontiers’ patented SPD-SmartGlass technology has been selected
as the exclusive smart glass for the USA Pavilion at this year’s World’s Fair, Expo Milano 2015 from May through October,
2015. The USA Pavilion 312 large panels of SPD-SmartGlass manufactured under license from Research Frontiers by
Isoclima S.p.A. Each panel measures approximately 1 meter by 3 meters, making the total surface area in the roof more
than 10,000 square feet. This is the largest known installation of smart glass in the world for a roof application, and was
seen by over six million people.

SPD-Smart windows, skylights, doors and partitions offer various benefits in architectural applications. During
2009, independent tests were conducted by DSET Laboratories, a division of Atlas Material Testing Technology, in
accordance with ASTM and ASHRAE testing and calculation protocols. These test results demonstrate that SPD-Smart
windows have excellent solar heat rejection and control capabilities. In January 2011 a study published by the Department
of Engineering at the University of Cambridge concluded that SPD-Smart light-control windows are exceptionally energy
efficient, reducing solar heat gain by as much as 90%. The Cambridge study indicated that the real-world testing “confirms
theoretical predictions that SPD glass holds great energy saving potential and is a technology that can really help to reduce
energy wastage of glass facades.” In addition to SPD-Smart technology, the Cambridge study discussed alternative
dynamic glazing technologies that could be used in windows (e.g. electrochromics) and reported that SPD-Smart
technology did not have the disadvantages that limited the potential of these alternative technologies. For example, the
study cited that an electrochromic window that is 2.4 square meters can take up to 30 minutes to change from clear to dark.

In November 2011, Research Frontiers’ licensee Innovative Glass Corporation was awarded two 2010 Crystal
Achievement Awards for their smart window product line using our SPD-Smart light-control technology. In October 2010,
their SPD-SmartGlass product was awarded WFX’s (Worship Facilities Conference & Expo) New Product award for Best
Building System Material Product/Window. Innovative Glass has completed or is working on a variety of SPD-SmartGlass
projects in the commercial, residential and institutional markets. Innovative Glass also periodically exhibits its SPD-
SmartGlass architectural products at Glass Expo Northeast in Hauppauge, New York. Glass Expo Northeast is the region’s
largest conference and trade show dedicated to the architectural glass and metal industry.

Research Frontiers licensee SmartGlass International has announced completion of several high visibility SPD-
SmartGlass installations. During February 2012, the company announced installation of SPD-SmartGlass at CERN, the
European Organization for Nuclear Research, which is one of the world’s largest and most respected centers for scientific
research. SmartGlass International installed SPD-SmartGlass in CERN’s Globe of Science and Innovation that will house
a permanent exhibition and is intended to serve as a venue for a wide range of activities, conferences and other events, In
February 2011, SmartGlass International announced it supplied retrofit SPD-SmartGlass to five London television studios
of the Associated Press. The SPD-SmartGlass used in these projects harvests daylight when it’s needed, improves occupant
comfort by providing controllable solar shading during peak light conditions, and preserves views. Just prior to this
installation, it was announced that SmartGlass International installed retrofit SPD-SmartGlass panels at the set of
“Daybreak,” the breakfast anchor program from ITV, one of the UK’s largest commercial television networks.

Research Frontiers has added a number of new architectural licensees over the last several years. In 2014, Research
Frontiers added Teknoglass Solutions LLP and Diamond Glass. Teknoglass Solutions LLP acquired a license from
Research Frontiers Inc. to make and sell SPD-SmartGlass architectural smart window products in the United Kingdom and
Republic of Ireland. Diamond Glass acquired a license from Research Frontiers Inc. to make and sell SPD-SmartGlass
architectural smart window products throughout Europe. In November of 2013 Research Frontiers announced that it had a
new licensee, MDV, who is targeting the architectural market in Brazil. In March of 2013 Research Frontiers announced
that it had added two new licensees, Tint-It JSC and Advnanotech, both of whom are targeting the architectural market (in
addition to the automotive aftermarket discussed previously) in Russia.

SPD-Smart Marine Products:

Research Frontiers and its licensees are currently working with marine customers to introduce SPD-Smart
products including windows, doors and partitions. When our patented SPD-Smart light-control technology is used in yacht
windows and other products, users can quickly and precisely control and “tune” the amount of light, glare and heat coming
through their windows, while preserving their view. Diamond Sea Glaze Manufacturing commenced marketing activities
for products using SPD technology during the second quarter of 2011 but did not renew its license for SPD-SmartGlass
technology for the marine market which terminated at the end of December 2017.

In October 2016 Vision Systems announced at the Monaco Yacht Show and 2016 IBEX new relationships for
offering SPD-SmartGlass products with Taylor Made Systems, ProCurve Glass, and Yachtglass. In addition, the Monaco
Yacht Show hosted the world premiere of the “Edition 1” model of the “ARROW460 – Granturismo,” which has SPD-
Smart dimmable glazing products throughout the Silver Arrows Marine motor yacht supplied by Vision Systems and
designed by Mercedes-Benz Design.

In November 2015, Silver Arrows Marine in conjunction with Mercedes-Benz Style (a design arm of Mercedes-
Benz) unveiled a new yacht called the ARROW460 – Granturismo featuring an SPD-SmartGlass electronically dimmable
roof. The roof, which is supplied by licensee Vision Systems, will be able to be electrically risen, creating a “glass pergola”
effect on the yacht. First customer deliveries of this production yacht are planned to start in early 2016. Vision Systems
presented its products at the 2015 Marine Equipment Trade Show in Amsterdam in November 2015 and at the Monaco
Yacht Show in September 2015.

In November 2013, Hatteras Yachts unveiled their new flagship motor yacht, the 100 Raised Pilothouse with dual

SPD-SmartGlass skylights in the galley as standard equipment at the 2013 Fort Lauderdale Boat Show.

In February 2013, licensee Isoclima demonstrated its VebLite brand of SPD-SmartGlass for marine applications
at SEATEC 2013 in Italy. SEATEC 2013 is a leading international exhibition of technology and design for boats,
megayachts and ships.

In November 2012, licensee Isoclima exhibited its VebLite brand of SPD-SmartGlass for marine applications at
the Marine Equipment Trade (METS) Show 2012 in The Netherlands. VebLite is Isoclima’s SPD-Smart solar control and
privacy glazing product that functions like a venetian blind. It has multiple segments that provide instantly customizable
shading fully controlled by the passenger and can be operated individually to create the effect of a shade being raised or
lowered or moved to the side. This precisely controls where incoming heat and glare enter a yacht or boat through a window
or rooflite, and also controls privacy levels.

In addition to exhibiting its SPD-Smart marine products at METS 2012, licensee Vision Systems’ SPD-Smart
Nuance dimmable marine window was named the category winner in the prestigious METS 2012 Design Award METS
(DAME) competition for interior equipment, furnishing, materials and electrical fittings used in cabins. DAME is
considered the world’s most prestigious design competition for new marine equipment and accessories. In METS’ news
release about the DAME award, it was noted “The Jury felt that Nuance is a major innovation that will benefit designers
and owners greatly - with comparatively little increase in cost.”

In October 2011, Cheoy Lee Shipyards unveiled the Alpha 76 Express, its most advanced production yacht, which
is fully-equipped with the latest yacht design features including SPD-SmartGlass supplied by Research Frontiers licensee
Diamond Sea Glaze. The Alpha has approximately 150 square feet of SPD-SmartGlass at various places throughout the
vessel and it is the first large-scale production yacht to make such extensive use of SPD-SmartGlass. In October 2012,
Cheoy Lee Shipyards exhibited two yachts – the Alpha 76 Express and the Alpha 76 Flybridge – at the 2012 Fort
Lauderdale International Boat Show with SPD-SmartGlass.

VariGuard SmartGlass Business Unit:

In May of 2013 Research Frontiers announced the formation of its VariGuard SmartGlass business unit. This
business unit allows the Company to directly address market opportunities for SPD technology outside the scope of its
current license agreements or the focus of its licensees. VariGuard SmartGlass is a developmental activity for the Company
and its revenues are currently immaterial relative to the Company’s licensing activities.

The VariGuard SmartGlass business unit markets and sells SPD-Smart products directly to customers for specialty
uses such as the protection of artwork and light-sensitive documents in museums and private collections. The business uses
an optimized fabrication designed specifically for its exhibition panels. The production of these panels is outsourced to
current licensees that have experience producing SPD laminates.

Excessive light-exposure is a leading cause of irreversible damage to many precious objects, particularly works
on paper, textiles and watercolor. Presently, no display system is able to provide these artifacts with any protection against
visible light damage. VariGuard SmartGlass provides the world’s first and only display panels that limit an artifact’s light-
exposure only to when the artifact is being viewed. This provides unequalled protection for light-sensitive artifacts by
substantially reducing an artifact’s overall lux-hour exposure when compared to conventional display panels.

VariGuard SmartGlass marketing and exhibition activities include:

● January 2018: VariGuard SmartGlass showcased its SPD-SmartGlass products at the West Coast Art and

Framing Expo at Omega Moulding’s booth #431.

● December 2017: To raise awareness of the unprecedented benefits of VariGuard SmartGlass, the
company has launched an advertising campaign targeting the display case and custom framing industries.
The first phase of the campaign utilizes publications from leading conservation institutions in the US
(Journal of the American Institute of Conservation), UK (Institute of Conservation) as well the leading
institution for the picture framing industry (Picture Framing Magazine).

● May 2017: VariGuard SmartGlass showcased its SPD-SmartGlass products at the 45th annual meeting
of the American Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works (AIC) in Chicago at booth
#107.

● September 2015: The Church History Museum, operated by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day
Saints, installed 22 exhibit cases containing VariGuard SmartGlass panels to protect light sensitive
documents and artifacts. VariGuard panels provide a better viewing experience (by allowing substantially
higher gallery illumination levels), while simultaneously reducing damaging visible light-exposure to
artifacts.

● August 2015: The Smithsonian’s National Postal Museum selected VariGuard SmartGlass panels to

protect the 1856 British Guiana One Cent Magenta, the world’s most famous rare postage stamp.

● May 2015: VariGuard SmartGlass exhibited its products at the American Institute for Conservation of
Historic and Artistic Works (“AIC”) 43rd annual meeting in Miami, FL. Seth Van Voorhees, President
of the VariGuard SmartGlass business unit commented: “Our display panels offer the highest level of
protection against UV and visible light damage in the industry and they are being used in cases, frames
and wall cases to protect various light sensitive artifacts in museums internationally. Reinforcing the
benefits of VariGuard panels and how they limit light exposure, the Smithsonian National Postal Museum
presented a paper at this meeting entitled “(Year of Light) Lighten Up: Enhancing Visitor Experiences,”
which will discuss the positive impact that VariGuard panels have in protecting valuable artifacts and
enhancing the visitor experience.
January 2015: VariGuard SmartGlass exhibited its display panels at a Washington Conservation Guild
meeting focused on innovative new conservation technologies at the Smithsonian Institution’s S. Dillon
Ripley Center in Washington, DC.

●

● November 2014: VariGuard SmartGlass was invited to present at a meeting of the Washington
Conservation Guild which was entitled: “Outsmarting Light: SmartGlass Technology in Exhibitions”. At
this meeting, results of the light conservation benefits of its light control panels at the National Postal
Museum were reported. This study quantified the dramatic reduction (>86%) in light exposure that
artifacts experienced in cases using VariGuard SmartGlass display panels versus traditional glass display
panels.
June 2014: VariGuard SmartGlass business unit announced that the Smithsonian’s National Postal
Museum will use VariGuard SmartGlass panels based on SPD-SmartGlass technology at the “Behind the
Badge” exhibition in Washington, DC. This exhibit showcases the work of one of the nation’s oldest
federal law enforcement agencies and VariGuard panels are featured in display cases that showcase
historic light-sensitive artifacts.
January 2014: VariGuard SmartGlass announced that Omega Moulding will distribute its patented light
control SmartGlass products for frames and display cases in the United States and Canada. That month
Omega Moulding showcased the benefits of VariGuard SmartGlass products at the 15th Annual West
Coast Art and Frame Expo and National Conference in Las Vegas, NV.

●

● May 2013: VariGuard SmartGlass featured its panels in several framing applications at Museum Expo

2013 at the Baltimore Convention Center in Baltimore, MD.

More information about VariGuard SmartGlass can be found on its independent website at www.VariGuard.com.

Marketing Activities and Licensee Support:

In addition to supporting the efforts of its licensees, the Company also recognizes the need to develop the SPD
industry as a whole. As such, the Company continues to plan and execute complementary programs that build awareness
and interest in smart glass generally and demand for SPD-Smart products specifically. In 2017 and 2016 these programs
include presentations at various general industry conferences, participation in panel presentations and discussions hosted
by academia, development of trade association educational materials, and presentations to architects, designers, and other
influential specifiers. For example, during 2017 and 2016 the Company participated in clean tech, emerging growth and
automotive glass conferences in Europe, and during 2016 the Company presented at the Autonomous Vehicle Interior
Design & Technology Symposium in Novi, Michigan and was the keynote speaker, and event chairman, at the annual CTI
Automotive Glazing USA Conference in Rochester, Michigan.

The Company’s market development department has a number of other initiatives in place. To help guide and
prioritize its technical and marketing investments, the Company periodically retains outside strategic marketing and other
consultants to help generate increased short- and medium-term market penetrations for each of the major markets for the
Company’s light-control technology, and to provide support and guidance to the Company’s licensees worldwide.

The Company has emerged as a leading resource for market research information on the subject of smart glass.
Research Frontiers lectures and presents at industry conferences in areas of energy efficiency, daylight harvesting and
sustainability. The Company has published independent test data about SPD-SmartGlass, shared the results of its research
studies and test data with industry and the media, posted various reference materials to the Company’s website for global
dissemination, and published presentations, data and bylined articles.

Research Frontiers maintains an active role with various standards-setting organizations, including ASTM

International which has an active committee developing standards for smartglass.

In addition to Research Frontiers providing overarching support of licensees’ sales efforts by developing the SPD
industry as a whole, leveraging its prominence as a leading resource on the topic of smart glass, and maintaining an active
role with standards organizations, Research Frontiers also supports licensees’ marketing and sales efforts directly.
Activities include advising and assisting with branding strategies and advertising campaigns, website development and
other marketing materials, joint presentations to prospective customers, and additional support. As a focal point of interest
in smart glass, resulting in many consumer and business inquiries, Research Frontiers has an active referral program to
generate customer leads for its licensees.

As part of this mission to develop the industry and to support our licensees’ acquiring SPD projects, Research
Frontiers completed the construction of the SPD-SmartGlass Design Center. This Center is also configured as an interactive
and energy-efficient “smart” executive office and conference room, and is located at the Company’s corporate headquarters
in Woodbury, New York. The SPD-SmartGlass Design Center features leading-edge SPD-Smart windows of different
sizes (some floor-to-ceiling) and framing materials. It has a multi-functional electronic controller system for manual,
remote, and automatic SPD-SmartGlass switching, and windows that can be controlled remotely over the internet or using
a smart phone. This interactive area also contains other types of smart glass, such as those using liquid crystal and
electrochromic technologies, allowing users to operate and experience first-hand the differences in performance
characteristics of different types of smart glass. Additional showcases of SPD-SmartGlass are being established in other
geographic locations to make it convenient for even more people to experience the benefits of SPD-SmartGlass technology.

Research Frontiers’ Design Center is the only known public forum where designers, specifiers and end-users can
compare performance between SPD-Smart technology and products using other light-control technologies. Research
Frontiers believes that the growth of the smart glass industry will accelerate as more information is made available through
direct comparisons. Research Frontiers believes that SPD products will be strongly preferred over competing technologies
once a direct comparison is available to potential buyers. Research Frontiers continues to encourage its competitors to
participate in public forums where consumers of electronically tintable products can see the relative performance of
products that are available.

Licensees of Research Frontiers:

The Company’s licensees are currently categorized into four main areas: materials for making films (emulsions),
film, lamination of film to glass or plastic, and end-products. Emulsion makers produce and combine the necessary
materials (i.e. SPD particles and various liquids and special polymers) from which SPD-Smart films are made. The film
makers coat a thin layer of emulsion between two sheets of plastic film, each of which has a transparent conductive coating.
This emulsion is then partly solidified to form an SPD film that allows users to control the amount of light, glare and heat
passing through this film. The end-product licensees then integrate this film into a variety of SPD-Smart products, or make
electronic systems to control such SPD-Smart products. Some of these end-product licensees do their own lamination of
the SPD light-control film to glass or plastic, and some outsource this lamination to other companies. The names of this
growing list of licensees, and the year that their license agreements were entered into, are contained in the Exhibit section
of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Licensees of Research Frontiers that incorporate SPD technology into end-products will pay Research Frontiers
a royalty of 5-15% of net sales of licensed products under license agreements currently in effect, and may also be required
to pay Research Frontiers fees and minimum annual royalties. Licensees that sell components (such as SPD emulsion or
film) or lamination services to other licensees of Research Frontiers do not pay a royalty on such sale or service, and
Research Frontiers will collect a royalty from the licensee incorporating these components into their own SPD-Smart end-
products. Research Frontiers’ license agreements typically allow the licensee to terminate the license after some period of
time, and give Research Frontiers only limited rights to terminate before the license expires. The licenses granted by the
Company are non-exclusive and generally last as long as Research Frontiers’ patents remain in effect. Due to their
bankruptcy filings or other termination of their general business activities or for other reasons, the Company does not
believe that Polaroid Corporation, Kerros Limited, ThermoView Industries, BRG Group, SPD Technologies, SPD Systems,
and Film Technologies International are pursuing business activities with respect to SPD technology. Diamond Sea Glaze,
GKN and Hotel Technologies did not renew their license agreements. The Company and SPD Control Systems agreed to
terminate their license agreement in December 2014 which resulted in a grant back to Research Frontiers of certain rights
in SPD Control Systems’ intellectual property. Some of the Company’s other licensees are currently inactive with respect
to SPD technology, but may hereafter become active again. To date, the Company has not generated sufficient revenue
from its licensees to profitably fund its operations. All of the Company’s license agreements are included as exhibits to the
Company’s periodic reports filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).

The Company plans to continue to exploit its SPD-Smart light-control technology by entering into additional
license and other agreements with end-product manufacturers such as manufacturers of flat glass, flat panel displays and
automotive products, and with other interested companies who may wish to acquire rights to manufacture and sell the
Company’s proprietary emulsions and films. Although the Company believes based upon the status of current negotiations
that additional license agreements with third parties will be entered into, there can be no assurance that any such additional
license agreements will be consummated, or of the extent to which any current or future licensee of the Company will
produce or sell commercial products using the Company’s technology or generate meaningful revenue from sales of such
licensed products.

The Company’s plans also call for further development of its technology and the provision of additional
technological and marketing assistance to its licensees to develop commercially viable SPD-Smart products, and expand
the markets for such products. The Company cannot predict when or if new license agreements will be entered into or the
extent to which commercial products will result from its existing or future licensees because of general economic conditions
and the risks inherent in the developmental process and because commercialization is dependent upon the efforts of its
licensees as well as on the continuing research and development efforts of the Company.

Competitive Technologies:

The Company believes that SPD light-control technology, in which particles move under the influence of an

electric field, has certain performance advantages over other “smart glass” technologies.

The Company believes that pricing and product performance are the two main factors critical to the adoption of
smart glass products. Because the non-SPD smart glass technologies listed below do not have published, consistent pricing
or cost data that can be relied upon, the Company cannot accurately report its price position relative to these other
technologies. In terms of product performance, the Company believes that SPD-SmartGlass technology offers numerous
advantages over other smart glass technologies as discussed below.

Variable light transmission technologies can be classified into two basic types: “active” technologies that can be
controlled electrically by the user either automatically or manually, and “passive” technologies that can only react to
ambient environmental conditions such as changes in lighting or temperature. One type of passive variable light
transmission technology is photochromic technology; such devices change their level of transparency in reaction to external
ultra-violet radiation. As compared to photochromic technology, the Company’s SPD technology permits the user to adjust
the amount of light passing through the viewing area of the device, rather than the viewing area of the photochromic device
merely reacting to external radiation without control by the user. In addition, the reaction time necessary to change from
light to dark with SPD-Smart technology can be almost instantaneous, as compared to the much slower reaction time for
photochromic devices. Also, unlike SPD technology, photochromic technology does not function well at the high and low
ends of the temperature range in which smart windows and other devices are normally expected to operate, nor does
photochromic technology perform well in vehicles or other enclosed settings where existing glass is blocking incoming
ultra-violet light which is required for photochromic devices to operate.

Similarly, thermochromic smart windows are passive systems which change their light transmission properties as
sunlight heats or cools the glass. Because the light transmission properties of thermochromic systems are not controlled by
the user, their ability to adapt to the specific needs of occupants is very limited. For example, thermochromic glazings will
remain tinted on hot days even when occupants desire more daylight to enter the building or when they want to preserve
their views. SPD-Smart windows, which require very low amounts of power to operate, allow for much greater control of
incoming light, glare and heat and can be adjusted to any level of light transmission from dark to clear at any time. In
addition, SPD-Smart windows can block up to 99.5% of incoming light, a level many times darker than thermochromic
systems. The added advantage offers much higher levels of privacy and control over incoming solar energy. Companies
involved in thermochromic technology include Pleotint, Suntek and Ravenbrick.

Active, user-controllable technologies, sometimes referred to as “smart” technologies, are generally more useful
than passive technologies because they allow the user to actually control the state of the window. This control is achieved
with a manual adjustment, or automatically when coupled with a timer or sensing device such as a photocell, motion
detector, thermostat or other intelligent building system.

There are three main types of active devices which are compared below:

● Electrochromic devices (EC)
● Liquid crystal devices (LC)
● Suspended-particle devices (SPD)

Electrochromic Technology:

Electrochromic windows and rear-view mirrors use a direct current voltage to alter the molecular structure of
electrochromic materials (which can be in the form of either a liquid, gel or solid film) causing the material to darken.
When compared to electrochromic devices, SPD technology is expected to have numerous potential performance and
manufacturing advantages, including some or all of the following:

significantly faster response time, especially compared to larger electrochromic glazings
ability to precisely “tune” an infinite number of intermediate light-transmission states
consistent and uniform switching speed regardless of size of glazing area

●
●
●
● more reliable performance over a wider temperature range
● higher contrast ratios and the capability of achieving darker shaded states for large area product

applications

● unpowered state is dark, maximizing solar heat gain benefits when the room, office or vehicle is not in

use
lower electrical current drain

●
● higher estimated battery life in applications where batteries are used
● no “iris effect” (where light transmission changes first occur at the outer edges of a window or mirror

and then work their way toward the center) when changing from clear to dark and back again

● SPD technology is a film-based technology that can be applied to plastic, acrylic, and chemically

strengthened glass as well as glass, and which can be applied to curved as well as flat surfaces
available in single panels for retrofitting existing windows, skylights and doors

●

Many companies with substantially greater resources than Research Frontiers such as 3M, Gentex Corp.,
Pilkington, PPG Industries, Saint-Gobain and other large corporations have pursued or are pursuing projects in the
electrochromic area. While some of these companies have reportedly discontinued or substantially curtailed their work on
electrochromics due to technical problems and issues relating to the expense of these technologies, at least four companies
(Gentex, PPG Industries, View (formerly known as Soladigm), and Sage Electrochromics) are currently working to
commercialize electrochromic window products. In May 2012, Saint-Gobain acquired Sage Electrochromics and combined
all of their respective electrochromic manufacturing and developmental efforts.

Liquid Crystal Technology:

To date, the main types of liquid crystal smart windows have been produced by Taliq Corp. (a subsidiary of
Raychem Corp. which has since discontinued its liquid crystal operations and licensed its technology to others), Asahi
Glass Co., Gauzy, Nippon Sheet Glass, Saint-Gobain Glass, iGlass Projects Pty Limited, Polytronix, Inc., DMDisplays,
and 3M (which has also reportedly discontinued its liquid crystal film making operations). The first four companies listed
above are also licensees of Research Frontiers Inc. for SPD-Smart technology. Liquid crystal windows only change from
a cloudy, opaque milky-white to a clear state, are hazy when viewed at an angle and have no useful intermediate states. As
compared to liquid crystal windows, SPD smart windows are expected to have some or all of the following advantages:

● have less haze
● provide shading without loss of view
● operate over a wider temperature range
● use less power
● have higher contrast ratios
●
● permit an infinite number of intermediate states between a transparent state and a dark blue state, rather

absorb and block more light, rather than simply scatter it

than being just two states.

● offer superior solar heat gain control

In the flat panel display market, further development (such as the achievement of faster switching speeds sufficient
for full-motion video applications) is required if the Company expects to compete against display technologies that are
currently being used commercially such as liquid crystal displays (“LCDs”) and organic light-emitting diodes (“OLEDs”).
Some of the advantages that SPD displays might have include the ability to make displays without using sheet polarizers
or alignment layers, and lower light loss and a corresponding reduction in backlighting requirements. However, such
products need additional product design, engineering or testing before an evaluation of the commercial potential of such
SPD-SmartGlass products can be determined and when, or if, its licensees may begin to penetrate the flat panel display
market.

LCDs and other types of displays, liquid crystal windows, as well as electrochromic self-dimmable rear-view
mirrors, are already on the market, whereas products incorporating SPD technology (as well as electrochromic windows)
have only begun to appear in the marketplace. Therefore, the long-term durability and performance of SPD-Smart displays
have not yet been fully ascertained. The companies that manufacture LCD and other display devices, liquid crystal
windows, and electrochromic self-dimmable rear-view mirrors and windows, have substantially greater financial resources
and manufacturing experience than the Company. There is no assurance that comparable systems having the same
advantages of the Company’s SPD technology could not be developed by competitors at a lower cost or that other products
could not be developed which would render the Company’s products difficult to market or otherwise render our products
obsolete.

Research and Development:

As a result of the Company’s research and development efforts, the Company believes that its SPD technology is
now, or with additional development will become, usable in a number of commercial products. Such products may include
one or more of the following fields: “smart” windows, doors, skylights and partitions; variable light transmission eyewear
such as sunglasses and goggles; self-dimmable automotive sunroofs, windows, sunvisors, and mirrors; display
cases/frames; and instruments and other information displays that use digits, letters, graphic images, or other symbols to
supply information, including scientific instruments, aviation instruments, automobile dashboard displays and, if certain
improvements can be made in various features of the Company’s SPD technology that increases switching speed to the
levels needed for video applications, portable computer displays and flat panel television displays.

Even though the Company’s SPD technology has much faster switching speeds than electrochromic technology,
current switching speeds are not fast enough for such video applications. The Company believes that most of its research
and development efforts have applicability to products that may incorporate the Company’s technology. At its current state
of development, the Company’s technology has been judged sufficiently advanced by various of its licensees and their
customers for them to proceed with the development, introduction and sale of SPD-Smart products. However, the Company
is continuously investing in research and development because it believes that further improvements will result in
accelerated and increased market penetration. The Company intends to continue its research and development efforts for
the foreseeable future to improve its SPD light-control technology and thereby assist our licensees in the product
development, sales and marketing of various existing and new SPD-Smart products.

During the past few years, the Company and/or its licensees have made significant advances relating to materials
to enable (1) improved stability of SPD emulsions, (2) a wider range of light transmission, (3) improved film adhesion and
cohesion and (4) increased durability of SPD films/laminates, and (5) cost reductions. These advances have resulted in two
patents being issued to the Company in the US Patent Office and the corresponding patent applications are pending.

The Company has devoted most of the resources it has heretofore expended to research and development activities
with the goal of producing commercially viable SPD products and has developed working prototypes of SPD-Smart
products for several different applications, with primary emphasis on smart windows for various industries. In addition to
working with the Company’s licensees, Research Frontiers has also expanded its efforts to also work directly with some
of our licensees’ major customers.

Research Frontiers’ main goals in its research and development include:

reducing the voltage required to operate SPDs

● developing wider ranges of light transmission and quicker switching speeds
● developing different colored particles
●
● obtaining data and developing improved materials regarding environmental stability and longevity
● quantifying the degree of energy savings expected by users of the Company’s technology including the
degree that SPD technology can control heat and its contribution to energy savings directly and through
daylight harvesting strategies in sustainable building designs
continually striving to improve the performance and reducing material/production costs associated with
making SPD-Smart products

●

Excluding non-cash expenses of approximately $12,000, $16,000, and $146,000, associated with the grant of
stock options and restricted stock to the Company’s technical personnel, Research Frontiers incurred approximately
$788,000, $1,402,000 and $1,442,000 during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively, for
research and development costs. Research Frontiers plans to engage in substantial continuing research and development
activities to invest in future improvements in SPD light-control technology and to expand for its licensees the capabilities
of SPD-Smart technology and the markets for SPD-Smart products.

Patents and Proprietary Information:

Research Frontiers continues to make substantial investments to develop, license and protect its intellectual
property position. The Company has 23 United States and 202 foreign patents in force. The Company’s United States
patents expire at various dates from 2019 through 2034, while its foreign patents expire at various dates from 2018 through
2033.

The Company has current US and foreign patent applications that, if granted, would add a significant number of
additional patents to its portfolio. The Company believes that its SPD light-control technology is adequately protected by
its patent position and by its proprietary technological know-how. However, the validity of the Company’s patents has
never been contested in any litigation. The Company also possesses know-how and relies on trade secrets and nondisclosure
agreements to protect its technology. The Company generally requires any employee, consultant, or licensee having access
to its confidential information to execute an agreement whereby such person agrees to keep such information confidential.

Rights Plan:

In February 2013, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted a Stockholders’ Rights Plan (the “Rights Plan”) and
declared a dividend distribution of one right (a “Right”) for each outstanding share of Company common stock to
stockholders of record at the close of business on March 3, 2003 (“Record Time”) and authorized the issuance of one Right
in respect of each share of Common Stock issued after the Record Time and prior to the Separation Time.

“Separation Time” shall mean the earlier of the Close of Business on the tenth Business Day (or such later date
as the Board of Directors may from time to time fix by resolution adopted prior to the Separation Time that otherwise
would have occurred) following but not including (i) the date on which any Person commences a tender or exchange offer
that, if consummated, would result in such Person’s becoming an Acquiring Person, and (ii) the date of the first event
causing a Flip-in Date to occur; provided that if any tender or exchange offer referred to in clause (i) of this paragraph is
cancelled, terminated or otherwise withdrawn prior to the Separation Time without the purchase of any shares of Common
Stock pursuant thereto, such offer shall be deemed, for purposes of this paragraph, never to have been made.

Subject to certain exceptions listed in the Rights Plan, if a person or group has acquired beneficial ownership of,
or commences a tender or exchange offer for, 15% or more of the Company’s common stock, unless redeemed by the
Company’s Board of Directors, each Right entitles the holder (other than the acquiring person) to purchase from the
Company $80 worth of common stock for $40. If the Company is merged into, or 50% or more of its assets or earning
power is sold to, the acquiring company, the Rights will also enable the holder (other than the acquiring person) to purchase
$80 worth of common stock of the acquiring company for $40. The Rights will expire at the close of business on February
11, 2023, unless the Rights Plan is extended by the Company’s Board of Directors or unless the Rights are earlier redeemed
by the Company at a price of $.0001 per Right. The Rights are not exercisable during the time when they are redeemable
by the Company.

The above description highlights some of the features of the Company’s Rights Plan and is not a complete
description of the Rights Plan. A more detailed description and copy of the Rights Plan has been filed with the SEC and is
available from the Company upon request.

Subsequent Event:

In February 2018, a small group of long-time shareholders of the Company made an interest-free five-year loan
of $1.25 million to the Company which, upon the occurrence of certain conditions, is expected to convert into common
stock at a price equal to the market price of the Company’s common stock when the loan was made, plus warrants
exercisable at a premium to such market price. No payments are due on this note during its five-year term.

Available Information:

Our principal executive offices are located at 240 Crossways Park Drive, Woodbury, New York 11797, our
telephone number is (516) 364-1902, and our Internet website address is www.SmartGlass.com. We make available free
of charge on or through our Internet website our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current
reports on Form 8-K, proxy statements on Schedule 14A, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file
such materials with, or furnish them to, the SEC.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

In addition to the other information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, you should carefully consider the
following factors in evaluating us and our business. This Annual Report contains, in addition to historical information,
forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, some of which are beyond our control. Should one or more
of these risks and uncertainties materialize or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, our actual results could differ
materially. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed below,
as well as those discussed elsewhere in this Annual Report, including the documents incorporated by reference.

There are risks associated with investing in companies such as ours who are primarily engaged in research and
development. In addition to risks which could apply to any company or business, you should also consider the business we
are in and the following:

Source and Need for Capital.

As of December 31, 2017, we had approximately $1.7 million in cash and cash equivalents. In February 2018, a
small group of long-time shareholders of the Company made an interest-free five-year loan of $1.25 million to the Company
which, upon the occurrence of certain conditions, is expected to convert into common stock at a price equal to the market
price of the Company’s common stock when the loan was made, plus warrants exercisable at a premium to such market
price. No payments are due on this note during its five-year term.

As we take steps in the commercialization and marketing of our technology, or respond to potential opportunities
and/or adverse events, our working capital needs may change. We anticipate that if our cash and cash equivalents are
insufficient to satisfy our liquidity requirements, we will require additional funding to sustain our ongoing operations and
to continue our SPD technology research and development activities.

We have funded most of our activities through sales of our common stock to investors, and upon the exercise of
options and warrants. Eventual success of the Company and generation of positive cash flow will be dependent upon the
extent of commercialization of products using the Company’s technology by the Company’s licensees and payments of
continuing royalties on account thereof. We can give no assurances that we will generate sufficient revenues in the future
(through sales of our common stock, exercise of options and warrants, royalty fees, or otherwise) to satisfy our liquidity
requirements or sustain future operations, or that additional funding, if required, will be available when needed or, if
available, on favorable terms.

History of Operating Losses.

We have experienced net losses from operations, and we may continue to incur net losses from operations in the
future. We have incurred substantial costs and expenses in researching and developing our SPD technology. As of
December 31, 2017, we had a cumulative net loss of $109,062,827 since our inception. Our net loss was $2,413,859 in
2017, $4,238,410 in 2016 and $4,279,856 in 2015, (which includes non-cash accounting charge in 2017, 2016 and 2015 of
$76,299, $67,531 and $725,016 respectively, resulting from the expensing of grants of restricted stock and stock options).

We may not generate sufficient cash flows to cover our operating expenses.

As noted above, we have incurred recurring losses since inception and expect to continue to incur losses as a result
of costs and expenses related to our research and continued development of our SPD technology and our corporate general
and administrative expenses. Our limited capital resources and operations to date have been substantially funded through
sales of our common stock, exercise of options and warrants and royalty fees collected. As of December 31, 2017, we had
working capital of approximately $2.1 million, cash of approximately $1.7 million, shareholders’ equity of approximately
$2.6 million and an accumulated deficit of approximately $109.1 million. In the event that we are unable to generate
sufficient cash from our operating activities or raise additional funds, we may be required to delay, reduce or severely
curtail our operations or otherwise impede our on-going business efforts, which could have a material adverse effect on
our business, operating results, financial condition and long-term prospects.

We have never declared a cash dividend and do not intend to declare a cash dividend in the foreseeable future.

We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our common stock. Payment of dividends on our common
stock is within the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend upon our future earnings, capital requirements,
financial condition and other relevant factors. We do not anticipate declaring or paying any cash dividends on our common
stock in the foreseeable future.

We do not directly manufacture products using SPD technology. We currently depend upon the activities of our licensees
and their customers in order to be profitable.

We do not directly manufacture products using SPD technology. We currently depend upon the activities of our
licensees in order to be profitable. Although a variety of products have been sold by our licensees, and because it is up to
our licensees to decide when and if they will introduce products using SPD technology, we cannot predict when and if our
licensees will generate substantial sales of such products. Our SPD technology is currently licensed to over 40 companies.
Other companies are also evaluating SPD technology for use in various products. In the past, some companies have
evaluated our technology without proceeding further. While we expect that our licensees would be primarily responsible
for manufacturing and marketing SPD-Smart products and components, we are also engaging in market development
activities to support our licensees and build the smart glass industry. We cannot control whether or not our licensees will
develop SPD products. Some of our licensees appear to be more active than others, some appear to be better capitalized
than others, and some licensees appear to be inactive. There is no guarantee when or if our licensees will successfully
produce any commercial product using SPD technology in sufficient quantities to make the Company profitable.

SPD-Smart products have only recently been introduced.

Products using SPD technology have only recently begun to be introduced into the marketplace. Developing
products using new technologies can be risky because problems, expenses and delays frequently occur, and costs may or
may not come down quickly enough for such products using new technologies to rapidly penetrate mass market
applications.

SPD-Smart products face intense competition, which could affect our ability to increase our revenues.

The market for SPD-Smart products is intensely competitive and we expect competition to increase in the future.
We compete based on the functionality and the quality of our product. Many of our current and potential competitors have
significantly greater financial, technical, marketing and other resources than we have. In addition, many of our competitors
have well-established relationships with our current and potential customers and have extensive knowledge of our industry.
If our competitors develop new technologies or new products, improve the functionality or quality of their current products,
or reduce their prices, and if we are unable to respond to such competitive developments quickly either because our research
and development efforts do not keep pace with our competitors or because of our lack of financial resources, we may be
unable to compete effectively.

Declining production of automobiles, airplanes, boats and real estate could harm our business.

Our licensees’ commercialization efforts of SPD-Smart products could be negatively impacted if the global
production of automobiles, airplanes, boats and real estate construction declines significantly. If such commercialization
is reduced, our revenues, results of operations and financial condition could be negatively impacted.

Single source of SPD film.

Our end-product licensees require a source of SPD film to manufacture finished products. Currently, Hitachi
Chemical is the sole source of commercial quantities of SPD-film. There are several other companies that are licensed to
manufacture SPD-film, but they have not begun commercial production of this film. Our end-product licensees’ ability to
sell SPD products could be negatively impacted if there was a prolonged disruption in SPD-film availability. Such a
disruption could also negatively impact our revenues, results of operations and financial condition.

We are dependent on key personnel.

Our continued success will depend, to a significant extent, on the services of our directors, executive management
team, key personnel and certain key scientists. If one or more of these individuals were to leave the Company, there is no
guarantee that we could replace them with qualified individuals in a timely or economically satisfactory manner or at all.
The loss or unavailability of any or all of these individuals could harm our ability to execute our business plan, maintain
important business relationships and complete certain product development initiatives, which would have a material
adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial conditions.

Dependence on SPD-Smart technology.

Because SPD technology is the only technology we work with, our success depends upon the viability of SPD
technology which has yet to be fully proven. We have not fully ascertained the performance and long-term reliability of
our technology, and therefore there is no guarantee that our technology will successfully be incorporated into all of the
products which we are targeting for use of SPD technology. We expect that different product applications for SPD
technology will have different performance and reliability specifications. We expect that our licensees will primarily be
responsible for reliability testing, but that we may also continue to do reliability testing so that we can more effectively
focus our research and development efforts towards constantly improving the performance characteristics and reliability
of products using SPD technology.

Our patents and other protective measures may not adequately protect our proprietary intellectual property, and we may
be infringing on the rights of others.

Our intellectual property, particularly our proprietary rights in our SPD technology, is critical to our success. We
have received various patents, and filed other patent applications, for various applications and aspects of our SPD
technology. In addition, we generally enter into confidentiality and invention agreements with our employees and
consultants. Such patents and agreements and various other measures we take to protect our intellectual property from use
by others may not be effective for various reasons generally applicable to patents and their granting and enforcement. In
addition, the costs associated with enforcing patents, confidentiality and invention agreements or other intellectual property
rights may be expensive. Our inability to protect our proprietary intellectual property rights or gain a competitive advantage
from such rights could harm our ability to generate revenues and, as a result, our business and operations.

An unremediated material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting could adversely affect our
reputation, business or stock price.

As described under “Item 9A - Controls and Procedures,” we previously identified a control deficiency
constituting a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting related to our controls over the
determination of our allowance for doubtful accounts in 2016. We developed and implemented a plan to remediate this
material weakness and based on our evaluation have concluded that this material weakness has been remediated during
2017.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

The Company currently occupies approximately 9,500 square feet of space at an annual rental which in 2017 was
approximately $185,000 for its executive office, research facility and SPD-Smart Glass Design Center at 240 Crossways
Park Drive, Woodbury, New York 11797 under a lease expiring March 31, 2025. The Company believes that its space,
including its laboratory facilities, is adequate for its present needs.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Research Frontiers Inc. v. E Ink Corporation et al

On July 12, 2013, Research Frontiers Inc. initiated a lawsuit against E Ink Corporation; E Ink Holdings, Inc. (f/k/a
Prime View International Co., Ltd.); Amazon.com, Inc.; Sony Electronics Inc.; Sony Corporation; Barnes & Noble, Inc.;
and Barnesandnoble.com LLC in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware for patent infringement.

Research Frontiers seeks an injunction in addition to monetary damages and pre-judgment interest and other relief.
In this lawsuit, Research Frontiers asserts infringement by the named defendants of United States Patent No. 6,606,185,
entitled “SPD Films and Light Valves Comprising Liquid Suspensions of Heat-Reflective Particles of Mixed Metal Oxides
and Methods of Making Such Particles,” and United States Patent No. 5,463,491, entitled “Light Valve Employing a Film
Comprising an Encapsulated Liquid Suspension, and Method of Making Such Film.”

On December 2, 2013 Research Frontiers amended its complaint and asserted an additional claim of United States
No. 6,271,956 entitled “Method and Materials for Enhancing the Adhesion of SPD Films, and Light Valves Comprising
Same.” No hearing or trial dates have been set.

On August 2014, the US Patent and Trademark Office Board declined a petition by E Ink Corporation to invalidate

certain claims (1-2, 14-20, 22-27, and 29) of the 6,606,185 patent.

On November 1, 2015, the Claim Construction Hearing was held before Magistrate Judge Christopher J. Burke.
On December 13, 2016 the Court issued its decision on this hearing. On January 31, 2017 Research Frontiers and the
Defendants in the lawsuit entered into a joint stipulation to permit immediate appeal of the claim construction ruling. On
December 15, 2017 the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled in E Ink’s favor regarding the claim
construction ruling. An update about the status of the litigation is available on the court docket.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

N/A

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER

MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

(a) Market Information

(1) The Company’s common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol “REFR”.

As of March 12, 2018, there were 24,043,846 shares of common stock outstanding.

(2) The following table sets forth the range of the high and low selling prices (as provided by the National
Association of Securities Dealers) of the Company’s common stock for each quarterly period within the
past two fiscal years:

Quarter Ended:
March 31, 2016 ......................................................
June 30, 2016 .........................................................
September 30, 2016 ...............................................
December 31, 2016 ................................................

March 31, 2017 ......................................................
June 30, 2017 .........................................................
September 30, 2017 ...............................................
December 31, 2017 ................................................

Low

High

4.04
3.30
2.56
1.65

1.25
0.98
1.01
0.86

5.20
5.03
3.82
2.62

2.15
1.55
1.35
1.46

These quotations may reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down, or commission, and may not

necessarily represent actual transactions.

(b) Approximate Number of Security Holders

As of March 12, 2018, there were approximately 330 holders of record of the Company’s common stock and the
closing price of our common stock was $0.99 per share. The Company estimates that there are approximately 6,900
beneficial holders of the Company’s common stock.

The Company has not declared or paid cash dividends on its common stock for the two most recent fiscal years
and does not expect to declare or pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. There are no restrictions on the payment
of dividends.

(d) Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

None.

ITEM 6.

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following table sets forth selected data regarding the Company’s operating results and financial position. The
data for fiscal years 2017, 2016 and 2015 should be read in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations and our audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, which
are contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Statement of Operations Data:

2017

Year ended December 31,
2015

2014

2016

2013

Fee income ................................................ $ 1,509,070 $ 1,236,097 $ 2,007,482 $ 1,598,799 $ 2,161,359

Operating expenses (1) ............................... 3,127,979 4,086,408 4,742,166 4,425,718 6,036,792
Research and development (1) ...................
799,702 1,417,634 1,588,491 1,621,964 2,203,326
Total Expenses ...................................... 3,927,681 5,504,042 6,330,657 6,047,682 8,240,118

Operating loss ........................................... (2,418,611 ) (4,267,945 ) (4,323,175 ) (4,448,883 ) (6,078,759 )

Net investment income .............................

38,148
Net loss ................................................. $ (2,413,859 ) $ (4,238,410 ) $ (4,279,856 ) $ (4,413,722 ) $ (6,040,611 )

35,161

29,535

43,319

4,752

Basic and diluted net loss per common
share .......................................................... $
Dividends per share .................................. $

(0.10 ) $
0.00 $

(0.18 ) $
0.00 $

(0.19 ) $
0.00 $

(0.26 )
0.00

Weighted average number of common
shares outstanding ..................................... 24,043,846 24,043,846 24,007,974 23,663,229 22,946,019

2017

2016

As of December 31,
2014
2015

2013

Balance Sheet Data:

Total current assets ................................ $ 2,364,985 $ 4,588,974 $ 8,674,234 $ 10,367,561 $ 11,945,295
Total assets ............................................ 2,881,113 5,274,196 9,544,017 12,564,854 12,032,265
Total shareholders’ equity ..................... 2,567,366 4,904,926 9,075,805 12,082,170 11,869,937

(1) Reflects non-cash charges of $64,709, $51,093, $578,723, $823,584 and $2,266,610 to operating
expenses, and non-cash charges of $11,590, $16,438, $146,293, $219,333 and $648,294 to research and
development expenses relating to the issuance of stock and stock options in 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014 and
2013, respectively which increased the Company’s net loss for 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014, and 2013 by
$76,299, $67,531, $725,016, $1,042,917, and $2,914,904, respectively.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS

OF OPERATIONS

Forward-Looking Statements

Information included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K may contain forward-looking statements within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are not statements of
historical facts, but rather reflect our current expectations concerning future events and results. We generally use the
words “believes,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “likely,” “will” and similar expressions to identify
forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements, including those concerning our expectations, involve risks,
uncertainties and other factors, some of which are beyond our control, which may cause our actual results, performance
or achievements, or industry results, to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements
expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These risks, uncertainties and factors include, but are not limited
to, those factors set forth in this Annual Report on Form 10-K under “Item 1A. – Risk Factors” above. Except as required
by applicable law, including the securities laws of the United States, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or
revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. You are
cautioned not to unduly rely on such forward-looking statements when evaluating the information presented in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.

In reviewing Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, you

should refer to our consolidated financial statements and the notes related thereto.

Critical Accounting Policies

The following accounting policies are important to understanding our financial condition and results of operations
and should be read as an integral part of the discussion and analysis of the results of our operations and financial position.
For additional accounting policies, see Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements, “Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies.”

The Company has entered into a number of license agreements covering potential products using the Company’s
SPD technology. The Company receives fees and minimum annual royalties under certain license agreements and records
fee income on a ratable basis each quarter. In instances when sales of licensed products by its licensees exceed minimum
annual royalties, the Company recognizes fee income as the amounts have been earned. Certain of the fees are accrued by,
or paid to, the Company in advance of the period in which they are earned resulting in deferred revenue.

Royalty receivables are stated less allowance for doubtful accounts. The allowance represents estimated
uncollectible receivables usually due to licensees’ potential insolvency. The allowance includes amounts for certain
licensees where risk of default has been specifically identified. The Company evaluates the collectability of its receivables
on at least a quarterly basis and records appropriate allowances for uncollectible accounts when necessary.

The Company expenses costs relating to the development or acquisition of patents due to the uncertainty of the
recoverability of these items. All of our research and development costs are charged to operations as incurred. Our research
and development expenses consist of costs incurred for internal and external research and development. These costs include
direct and indirect overhead expenses.

The Company has historically used the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to determine the estimated fair value
of each option grant. The Black-Scholes model includes assumptions regarding dividend yields, expected volatility,
expected lives, and risk-free interest rates. These assumptions reflect our best estimates, but these items involve
uncertainties based on market conditions generally outside of our control. As a result, if other assumptions had been used
in the current period, stock-based compensation expense could have been materially impacted. Furthermore, if management
uses different assumptions in future periods, stock-based compensation expense could be materially impacted in future
years.

On occasion, the Company may issue to consultants either options or warrants to purchase shares of common
stock of the Company at specified share prices. These options or warrants may vest based upon specific services being
performed or performance criteria being met. In accounting for equity instruments that are issued to other than employees
for acquiring, or in conjunction with selling, goods or services, the Company is required to record consulting expenses
based upon the fair value of such options or warrants on the earlier of the service period or the period that such options or
warrants vest as determined using a Black-Scholes option pricing model and are marked to market quarterly using the
Black-Scholes option valuation model.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities
and the disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from these estimates. An example of a critical estimate
is the full valuation allowance for deferred taxes that was recorded based on the uncertainty that such tax benefits will be
realized in future periods.

Results of Operations

Overview

The majority of the Company’s fee income comes from the activities of several licensees participating in the
automotive market. The Company currently believes that the automotive market will be the largest source of its royalty
income over the next several years. The Company’s royalty income from this market may be influenced by numerous
factors including various trends affecting demand in the automotive industry and the rate of introduction of new technology
in OEM product lines. In addition to these macro factors, the Company’s royalty income from the automotive market could
also be influenced by specific factors such as whether the Company’s SPD-SmartGlass technology appears as standard
equipment or as an option on a particular vehicle, the number of additional vehicle models that SPD-SmartGlass appears
on, the size of each window on a vehicle and the number of windows on a vehicle that use SPD-SmartGlass, fluctuations
in the total number of vehicles produced by a manufacturer, and in the percentage of cars within model like produced with
SPD-SmartGlass, and changes in pricing or exchange rates. Certain license fees, which are paid to the Company in advance
of the accounting period in which they are earned resulting in the recognition of deferred revenue for the current accounting
period, which will be recognized as fee income in future periods. Also, licensees may offset some or all of their royalty
payments on sales of licensed products for a given period by applying these advance payments towards such earned royalty
payments.

In 2017 and 2016, the Company received royalty revenues from sales of the Magic Sky Control option on the S-
Class Coupe, Maybach and S-Class Sedan, and SL and SLK/SLC roadsters in excess of the minimum annual royalty levels
for the two licensees supplying products using the Company’s technology to Daimler. As such, royalties from these five
car models was accretive to the Company’s royalty revenue. Production efficiencies are expected to continue and accelerate
with the introduction of the higher vehicle production volumes for various car models going forward, and the Company
expects that lower pricing per square foot of the Company’s technology could expand the market opportunities, adoption
rates, and revenues for its technology in automotive and non-automotive applications. The Company expects to generate
additional royalty income from the near-term introduction of additional new car and aircraft models from other OEM’s
(original equipment manufacturers), continued growth of sales of products using the Company’s technology for the marine
industry in yachts and other watercraft, in trains, in museums, and in larger architectural projects.

Because the Company’s license agreements typically provide for the payment of royalties by a licensee on product
sales within 45 days after the end of the quarter in which a sale of a licensed product occurs (with some of the Company’s
more recent license agreements providing for payments on a monthly basis), and because of the time period which typically
will elapse between a customer order and the sale of the licensed product and installation in a home, office building,
automobile, aircraft, boat or any other product, there could be a delay between when economic activity between a licensee
and its customer occurs and when the Company gets paid its royalty resulting from such activity.

Year ended December 31, 2017 Compared to the Year ended December 31, 2016

The Company’s fee income for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $1,509,070, as compared to $1,236,097
for the year ended December 31, 2016. A substantial majority of this increase was principally the result of increase fees
earned during 2017 from licensees focused in automotive, marine, display and architectural industries which was partially
offset by slightly lower level of fee income from licensees focused in the aircraft industry (which the Company believes to
be temporary).

Operating expenses decreased by $958,429 for the year ended December 31, 2017 to $3,127,979 from $4,086,408
for the year ended December 31, 2016. A substantial majority of this decrease was the result of cost reduction initiatives
undertaken by the Company that resulted in lower payroll and related costs ($200,000), marketing and investor relations
costs ($125,000) and patent costs ($177,000), as well as lower bad debt expenses ($425,000). Included in operating
expenses is approximately $64,000 and $51,000 of non-cash compensation charges for the years ended December 31, 2017
and 2016, respectively.

Research and development expenditures decreased by $617,932 to $799,702 for the year ended December 31,
2017 from $1,417,634 for the year ended December 31, 2016. A substantial majority of this decrease was the result of cost
reduction initiatives undertaken by the Company that resulted lower payroll and related costs ($555,000) as well as lower
material costs ($23,000). Included in research and development expenses are approximately $12,000 and $16,000 of non-
cash compensation charges for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

The Company’s net investment income for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $4,752 as compared to $29,535
for the year ended December 31, 2016. The difference was primarily due to lower interest earned from cash balances
available for investment.

No income tax benefit or expense was recorded for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.

As a consequence of the factors discussed above, the Company’s net loss was $2,413,859 ($0.10 per common
share) for the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to $4,238,410 ($0.18 per common share) for the year ended
December 31, 2016.

Year ended December 31, 2016 Compared to the Year ended December 31, 2015

The Company’s fee income from licensing activities for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $1,236,097, as
compared to $2,007,482 for the year ended December 31, 2015. A substantial majority of this decrease was principally the
result of non-recurring fees earned in 2015 associated with the Company’s participation in the Milan Expo, and other non-
recurring fee income under several licenses in 2015. To a much lesser extent, fee income from automobiles and aircraft
using the Company’s technology was lower in 2016 due to: (1) lower production levels of certain car models in the period;
(2) lower costs to the OEM (and therefore lower royalties per car to the Company) for glass incorporating the Company’s
technology on certain car models, and (3) a design improvement in certain aircraft that caused a short-term reduction in
new window installations. These factors were partially offset by higher sales volumes on other car and aircraft models
using the Company’s technology.

Operating expenses decreased by $655,758 for the year ended December 31, 2016 to $4,086,408 from $4,742,166
for the year ended December 31, 2015. This decrease was the result of lower payroll and related costs ($588,000) and lower
marketing and investor relations costs ($75,000) partially offset by higher bad debt expenses ($157,000). Included in
operating expenses are approximately $51,000 and $579,000 of non-cash compensation charges for the years ended
December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Research and development expenditures decreased by $170,857 to $1,417,634 for the year ended December 31,
2016 from $1,588,491 for the year ended December 31, 2015. This decrease was the result of lower payroll and related
costs ($127,000) as well as lower material costs ($29,000). Included in research and development expenses are
approximately $16,000 and $146,000 of non-cash compensation charges for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015,
respectively.

The Company’s net investment income for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $29,535 as compared to
$43,319 for the year ended December 31, 2015. The difference was primarily due to lower interest earned from cash
balances available for investment.

No income tax benefit or expense was recorded for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.

As a consequence of the factors discussed above, the Company’s net loss was $4,238,410 ($0.18 per common
share) for the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to $4,279,856 ($0.18 per common share) for the year ended
December 31, 2015.

Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company has primarily utilized its cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments, and the proceeds from its
investments to fund its research and development, for marketing initiatives, and for other working capital purposes. The
Company’s working capital and capital requirements depend upon numerous factors, including, but not limited to, the
results of research and development activities, competitive and technological developments, the timing and costs of patent
filings, and the development of new licensees and changes in the Company’s relationship with existing licensees. The
degree of dependence of the Company’s working capital requirements on each of the foregoing factors cannot be quantified;
increased research and development activities and related costs would increase such requirements; the addition of new
licensees may provide additional working capital or working capital requirements, and changes in relationships with
existing licensees would have a favorable or negative impact depending upon the nature of such changes.

During 2017, the Company’s cash and cash equivalents balance increase by $46,244 principally as a result of cash
proceeds of $1,523,333 from the sale of an investment partially offset by cash used for operations of $1,470,540 and cash
used for the purchase of property and equipment of $6,549. At December 31, 2017 the Company had cash and short-term
investments of $1,737,847, working capital of $2,051,238 and total shareholders’ equity of $2,567,366.

Our quarterly projected cash flow shortfall, based on our current operations adjusted for any non-recurring cash
expenses for the next 12 months, is approximately $350,000-450,000 per quarter. We may eliminate some operating
expenses in the future, which will further reduce our cash flow shortfall if needed. Based on the expected benefit of expense
reductions and the recently completed convertible debt offering detailed in the Subsequent Event section of this report, we
expect to have sufficient working capital for the next 18 months of operations. Since last year we have reduced our cash
shortfall and are working to further reduce it and may seek new sources of financing.

During 2016, the Company’s cash and cash equivalents balance decreased by $4,020,707 principally because of
cash used for operations of $4,005,443 and cash used for the purchase of property and equipment of $11,715. At December
31, 2016 the Company had cash and short-term investments of $3,214,936 working capital of $4,219,704 and total
shareholders’ equity of $4,904,926.

During 2015, the Company’s cash and cash equivalents balance decreased by $1,857,227 principally because of
cash used for operations of $3,580,812 and cash used for the purchase of property and equipment of $316,185 partially
offset by cash proceeds from the maturity of a certificate of deposit of $1,491,295 as well as net proceeds of $548,475 from
the exercise of options and warrants. At December 31, 2015 the Company had working capital of $8,206,022 and total
shareholders’ equity of $9,075,805.

The Company expects to use its cash to fund its research and development of SPD light valves, its expanded
marketing initiatives, and for other working capital purposes. Based upon existing cash reserves, the funds raised in
February 2018 (detailed in the Subsequent Event section of this report), historical revenues and cash expenditures, the
Company believes that its current cash and cash equivalents would fund its operations until at least the fourth quarter of
2019. There can be no assurances that expenditures will not exceed the anticipated amounts or that additional financing, if
required, will be available when needed or, if available, that its terms will be favorable or acceptable to the Company.
Eventual success of the Company and generation of positive cash flow will be dependent upon the extent of
commercialization of products using the Company’s technology by the Company’s licensees and payments of continuing
royalties on account thereof. To date the Company has not generated sufficient revenue from its licensees to fully fund its
operations.

Inflation

The Company does not believe that inflation has a significant impact on its business.

Contractual Obligations

The Company occupies premises under an operating lease agreement which was to expire on March 31, 2025 and
requires minimum annual rent which rises over the term of the lease to approximately $222,000, plus tenant’s share of
applicable taxes. These lease obligations are summarized over time as of December 31, 2017:

Operating lease obligations ........ $ 185,000 $ 389,000 $ 412,000 $ 493,000 $ 1,479,000

<1 year

1-3 years 4-5 years >5 years

Total

Payments due by period

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company has no variable interest entities or other off-balance sheet obligation arrangements.

Related Party Transactions

None.

Forward Looking Statements

The information set forth in this Report and in all publicly disseminated information about the Company, including
the narrative contained in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”
above, includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is subject to the safe harbor created by that section. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on
these forward-looking statements as they speak only as of the date hereof and are not guaranteed.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK

At times, the Company invests available cash and cash equivalents in money market funds or in short-term U.S.
treasury securities with maturities that are generally one year or less. Although the rate of interest paid on such investments
in money market funds may fluctuate over time, each of the Company’s investments in U.S. treasury securities is made at
a fixed interest rate over the duration of the investment. Accordingly, the Company does not believe it is materially exposed
to changes in interest rates as it generally holds these treasury securities until maturity.

The Company does not currently have any sales, purchases, assets or liabilities determined in currencies other

than the U.S. dollar, and as such, is not subject to foreign currency exchange risk.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

The consolidated financial statements listed in Item 15(a)(1) and (2) are included in this Report beginning on page

F-1.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Company carried out an evaluation,
under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls
and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e). Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are
effective in timely alerting them to material information relating to the Company (including its consolidated subsidiary)
required to be included in the Company’s periodic SEC filings. Our officers have concluded that as of December 31, 2017
our disclosure controls and procedures are designed, and are effective, to ensure that information required to be disclosed
by our company in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported,
within the time periods specified in the commission’s rules and forms, and are also effective to ensure that information
required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to
our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosure. There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarterly
period ended December 31, 2017 (other than those that were implemented to remediate a material weakness identified in
2016 detailed below) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control
over financial reporting.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting,
as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Our internal control system is designed to provide reasonable
assurance to our management and Board of Directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial
statements. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer and
chief financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based
on the framework in Internal Control-Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission, or the COSO Framework. Based on our evaluation under the COSO Framework (2013) our
management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2017.

In connection with the preparation of our consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December
31, 2016, we identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting related to our controls over the
determination of our allowance for doubtful accounts. This control deficiency resulted in a material adjustment to our
provision for bad debt expense which is reflected in our annual financial statements as of and for the year ended December
31, 2016. As a result of this control deficiency we were unable to timely recognize if an adjustment was required to fairly
state our allowance for doubtful accounts. The deficiency constituted a material weakness in our internal control over
financial reporting.

Management implemented a remediation plan to address the control deficiency that led to the material weakness.
The remediation plan included, but is not limited to, the implementation of additional review procedures designed to
enhance our evaluation controls over our allowance for doubtful accounts. The enhanced review/evaluation procedures and
documentation standards were put in place and in operation starting in the first quarter of 2017. We have concluded as of
December 31, 2017 through our testing of the enhanced control that it is operating effectively and the previously identified
material weakness has been remediated.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes to controls (other than those that were implemented to remediate a material weakness
identified in 2016 detailed above) during the quarter ended December 31, 2017 that have materially affected or are
reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The Company has adopted a code of ethics applicable to its Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer,
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer, any Vice President and other employees of the Company with important roles in the
financial reporting process. This Code of Ethics was adopted by the entire Board of Directors of the Company, including
all of its Audit Committee members, in March 2004 in accordance with the requirements of the Sarbanes Oxley Act. The
code of ethics is available on the Company’s website at www.SmartGlass.com and was also filed as an exhibit to the
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. The Company intends to satisfy the
disclosure requirement under Item 10 of Form 8-K regarding any amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of this code
of ethics by posting such information on the website specified above.

The other information required by this Item 10 is incorporated by reference to the Company’s definitive Proxy

Statement to be filed with the Commission on or before April 30, 2018.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information required by this Item 11 is incorporated by reference to the Company’s definitive Proxy
Statement to be filed with the Commission on or before April 30, 2018. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth
herein or in any of the Company’s past or future filings with the SEC that might incorporate by reference the Company’s
definitive Proxy Statement, in whole or in part, the report of the compensation committee and the stock price performance
graph contained in such definitive Proxy Statement shall not be incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form
10-K or in any other such filings.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND

RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The information required by this Item 12 is incorporated by reference to the Company’s definitive Proxy

Statement to be filed with the Commission on or before April 30, 2018.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR

INDEPENDENCE.

The information required by this Item 13 is incorporated by reference to the Company’s definitive Proxy

Statement to be filed with the Commission on or before April 30, 2018.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

The information required by this Item 14 is incorporated by reference to the Company’s definitive Proxy

Statement to be filed with the Commission on or before April 30, 2018.

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

(a)(1) and (2) Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules

The following consolidated financial statements of Research Frontiers Incorporated are filed under “Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplemental Data” of this Report.

Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm .................................................................................... F-1
Consolidated Financial Statements:

Consolidated Balance Sheets, December 31, 2017 and 2016 .............................................................................. F-2
Consolidated Statements of Operations, Years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 ................................ F-3
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity, Years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 ............... F-4
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, Years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 .............................. F-5
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ............................................................................................................ F-6
Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts ................................................................................................... F-17

All other schedules have been omitted because they are not applicable, or not required, or the required information

is disclosed elsewhere in this Annual Report.

(a)(3)

Exhibits

3.1

3.2

4.1

4.2

10.1A*

10.1B*

10.1C*

10.2*

10.3*

Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company. Previously filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 1994, and incorporated herein by
reference.

Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company. Previously filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference.

Form of Common Stock Certificate. Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Registration Statement
on Form S-18 (Reg. No. 33-5573NY), declared effective by the Commission on July 8, 1986, and
incorporated herein by reference.

Rights Agreement dated as of February 18, 2003 between Research Frontiers Incorporated and Continental
Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Rights Agent, which includes as Exhibit A thereto the Form of Rights
Certificate. Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A dated
February 13, 2013, and incorporated herein by reference.

Employment Agreement effective as of January 1, 2009 between the Company and Joseph M. Harary.
Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 30, 2009 and
incorporated herein by reference.

Amendment to Employment Agreement effective as of June 12, 2014 between the Company and Joseph M.
Harary. Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 13, 2014
and incorporated herein by reference.

Employment Agreement effective as of January 1, 2014 between the Company and Seth L. Van Voorhees
Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 10-K dated December 31, 2013
and incorporated herein by reference.

Amended and Restated 1992 Stock Option Plan. Previously filed as Exhibit 4 to the Company’s Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (Reg. No. 33-86910) filed with the Commission on November 30, 1994, and
incorporated herein by reference.

1998 Stock Option Plan, as amended. Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Definitive Proxy
Statement dated April 30, 1998 filed with the Commission on April 29, 1998, 1994, and incorporated herein
by reference.

10.31*

2008 Equity Incentive Plan. Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement
dated April 30, 2008 filed with the Commission on April 29, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference.

10.4*

10.5

10.5.1

10.5.2

10.5.3

10.5.4

10.5.5

10.6

10.7

10.8

10.9

10.10

10.11

Form of Stock Option Agreement between the Company and recipients of stock options issued pursuant to
the Company’s Stock Option Plans. Previously filed as part of Exhibits 4.1, 4.2, and 4.3 to the Company’s
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Reg. No. 33-53030) filed with the Commission on October 6, 1992,
and incorporated herein by reference.

Lease Agreement dated November 7, 1986, between the Company and Industrial & Research Associates
Co. Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1986 and incorporated herein by reference.

First Amendment to Lease dated November 26, 1991 between the Company and Industrial and Research
Associates Co. Previously filed as an Exhibit to Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Registration Statement
on Form S-1 (Reg. No. 33-43768) declared effective by the Commission on December 17, 1991, and
incorporated herein by reference.

Second Amendment to Lease dated March 11, 1994 between the Company and Industrial and Research
Associates Co. Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 1993 and incorporated herein by reference.

Third Amendment to Lease dated July 14, 1998 between the Company and Industrial and Research
Associates Co. Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 1998 and incorporated herein by reference.

Fourth Amendment to Lease dated January 13, 2004 between the Company and Industrial and Research
Associates Co. Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference.

Fifth Amendment to Lease dated February 21, 2014 between the Company and CLK-HP 230-240
CROSSWAYS PARK LLC and LAKE PARK 230-240 CROSSWAYS PARK LLC. Previously filed as an
exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 and
incorporated herein by reference.

License Agreement effective as of August 2, 1995 between the Company and General Electric Company.
Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 2, 1995 with
portions omitted pursuant to the Registrant’s request for confidential treatment and filed separately with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, and incorporated herein by reference.

License Agreement effective as of April 29, 1996 between the Company and Glaverbel, S.A. Previously
filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31,
1996 with portions omitted pursuant to the Registrant’s request for confidential treatment and filed
separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and incorporated herein by reference.

License Agreement effective as of January 18, 1997 between the Company and Material Sciences
Corporation. Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 3,
1997 with portions omitted pursuant to the Registrant’s request for confidential treatment and filed
separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and incorporated herein by reference.

License Agreement effective as of March 31, 1997 between the Company and Hankuk Glass Industries,
Inc. Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter
ended September 30, 1997 with portions omitted pursuant to the Registrant’s request for confidential
treatment and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and incorporated herein by
reference.

License Agreement effective as of August 8, 1997 between the Company and Orcolite, a Unit of Monsanto
Company. Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter ended September 30, 1997 with portions omitted pursuant to the Registrant’s request for confidential
treatment and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and incorporated herein by
reference.

License Agreement effective as of June 25, 1999 between the Company and Dainippon Ink and Chemicals,
Incorporated. Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter ended June 30, 1999 with portions omitted pursuant to the Registrant’s request for confidential
treatment and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and incorporated herein by
reference.

10.12

10.13

10.14

10.15

10.16

10.17

10.18

10.19

10.20

10.21

10.22

10.23

License Agreement effective as of August 9, 1999 between the Company and Hitachi Chemical Co., Ltd.
Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
September 30, 1999 with portions omitted pursuant to the Registrant’s request for confidential treatment
and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and incorporated herein by reference.

License Agreement effective as of December 3, 1999 between the Company and Global Mirror GmbH &
Co. KG. Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 1999 with portions omitted pursuant to the Registrant’s request for confidential
treatment and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and incorporated herein by
reference.

License Agreement effective as of December 13, 1999 between the Company and Global Mirror GmbH &
Co. KG. Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 1999 with portions omitted pursuant to the Registrant’s request for confidential
treatment and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and incorporated herein by
reference.

License Agreement effective as of March 21, 2000 between the Company and ThermoView Industries, Inc.
Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1999 with portions omitted pursuant to the Registrant’s request for confidential treatment
and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and incorporated herein by reference.

License Agreement effective as of May 23, 2000 between the Company and Polaroid Corporation.
Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
June 30, 2000 with portions omitted pursuant to the Registrant’s request for confidential treatment and filed
separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and incorporated herein by reference.

License Agreement effective as of February 16, 2001 between the Company and AP Technoglass Co.
Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2001 with portions omitted pursuant to the Registrant’s request for confidential treatment
and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and incorporated herein by reference.

License Agreement effective as of March 21, 2001 between the Company and InspecTech Aero Service,
Inc. Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2001 with portions omitted pursuant to the Registrant’s request for confidential treatment
and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and incorporated herein by reference.

License Agreement effective as of March 28, 2001 between the Company and Film Technologies
International, Inc. Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2001 with portions omitted pursuant to the Registrant’s request for
confidential treatment and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and incorporated
herein by reference.

License Agreement effective as of November 29, 2001 between the Company and Avery Dennison
Corporation. Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2001 with portions omitted pursuant to the Registrant’s request for confidential
treatment and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and incorporated herein by
reference.

License Agreement effective as of February 4, 2002 between the Company and BOS GmbH & Co. KG.
Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2001 with portions omitted pursuant to the Registrant’s request for confidential treatment
and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and incorporated herein by reference.

License Agreement effective as of March 11, 2002 between the Company and Isoclima S.p.A. Previously
filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2001 with portions omitted pursuant to the Registrant’s request for confidential treatment and filed
separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and incorporated herein by reference.

License Agreement effective as of July 2, 2002 between the Company and Isoclima S.p.A. Previously filed
as an Exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002
with portions omitted pursuant to the Registrant’s request for confidential treatment and filed separately
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and incorporated herein by reference.

10.24

10.25

10.26

10.27

10.28

10.29

10.30

10.31

10.32

10.33

10.34

10.35

License Agreement effective as of August 19, 2002 between the Company and Razor’s Edge Technologies,
Inc. Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2002 with portions omitted pursuant to the Registrant’s request for confidential treatment
and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and incorporated herein by reference.

License Agreement effective as of October 7, 2002 between the Company and American Glass Products
(Glass Technology Investment Ltd.). Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 with portions omitted pursuant to the Registrant’s
request for confidential treatment and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and
incorporated herein by reference.

License Agreement effective as of October 7, 2002 between the Company and SPD Systems, Inc. Previously
filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2002 with portions omitted pursuant to the Registrant’s request for confidential treatment and filed
separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and incorporated herein by reference.

License Agreement effective as of October 24, 2002 between the Company and Cricursa Cristales Curvados
S.A. Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2002 with portions omitted pursuant to the Registrant’s request for confidential treatment
and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and incorporated herein by reference.

License Agreement effective as of December 9, 2002 between the Company and BRG Group, Ltd.
Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2002 with portions omitted pursuant to the Registrant’s request for confidential treatment
and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and incorporated herein by reference.

License Agreement effective as of December 13, 2002 between the Company and Laminated Technologies
Inc. Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2002 with portions omitted pursuant to the Registrant’s request for confidential treatment
and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and incorporated herein by reference.

License Agreement effective as of April 17, 2003 between the Company and Custom Glass Corporation.
Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2003 with portions omitted pursuant to the Registrant’s request for confidential treatment
and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and incorporated herein by reference.

License Agreement effective as of May 2, 2003 between the Company and Air Products and Chemicals,
Inc. Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2003 with portions omitted pursuant to the Registrant’s request for confidential
treatment and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and incorporated herein by
reference.

License Agreement effective as of May 30, 2003 between the Company and Kerros Limited. Previously
filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2003 with portions omitted pursuant to the Registrant’s request for confidential treatment and filed
separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and incorporated herein by reference.

License Agreement effective as of June 6, 2003 between the Company and Traco, Inc. Previously filed as
an Exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003
with portions omitted pursuant to the Registrant’s request for confidential treatment and filed separately
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and incorporated herein by reference.

License Agreement effective as of June 16, 2003 between the Company and Saint-Gobain Glass France
S.A. Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2003 with portions omitted pursuant to the Registrant’s request for confidential
treatment and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and incorporated herein by
reference.

License Agreement effective as of August 1, 2003 between the Company and Vision (Environmental
Innovation) Limited. Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 with portions omitted pursuant to the Registrant’s request for
confidential treatment and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and incorporated
herein by reference.

10.36

10.37

10.38

10.39

10.40

10.41

10.42

10.43

10.44

10.45

10.46

10.47

License Agreement effective as of November 13, 2003 between the Company and Innovative Glass
Corporation. Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2003 with portions omitted pursuant to the Registrant’s request for confidential
treatment and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and incorporated herein by
reference.

License Agreement effective as of December 11, 2003 between the Company and Leminur Limited.
Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2003 with portions omitted pursuant to the Registrant’s request for confidential treatment
and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and incorporated herein by reference.

License Agreement effective as of March 25, 2004 between the Company and Pilkington plc. Previously
filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2004 with portions omitted pursuant to the Registrant’s request for confidential treatment and filed
separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and incorporated herein by reference.

License Agreement effective as of April 5, 2004 between the Company and SmartGlass Ireland Ltd.
Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004 with portions omitted pursuant to the Registrant’s request for confidential treatment
and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and incorporated herein by reference.

License Agreement effective as of April 8, 2004 between the Company and Prelco Inc. Previously filed as
an Exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004
with portions omitted pursuant to the Registrant’s request for confidential treatment and filed separately
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and incorporated herein by reference.

License Agreement effective as of April 13, 2004 between the Company and E. I. Dupont De Nemours and
Company. Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2004 with portions omitted pursuant to the Registrant’s request for confidential
treatment and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and incorporated herein by
reference.

License Agreement effective as of September 3, 2004 between the Company and Nippon Sheet Glass Co.,
Ltd. Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004 with portions omitted pursuant to the Registrant’s request for confidential treatment
and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and incorporated herein by reference.

License Agreement effective as of October 25, 2005 between the Company and SPD Control Systems
Corporation. Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October
31, 2005 with portions omitted pursuant to the Registrant’s request for confidential treatment and filed
separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and incorporated herein by reference.

License Agreement effective as of March 30, 2006 between the Company and Dainippon Ink and
Chemicals. Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 4,
2006 with portions omitted pursuant to the Registrant’s request for confidential treatment and filed
separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and incorporated herein by reference.

License Agreement effective as of May 11, 2006 between the Company and Asahi Glass Company.
Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 15, 2006 with
portions omitted pursuant to the Registrant’s request for confidential treatment and filed separately with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, and incorporated herein by reference.

License Agreement effective as of March 19, 2007 between the Company and SmartGlass International
Ltd. Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 19, 2007
with portions omitted pursuant to the Registrant’s request for confidential treatment and filed separately
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and incorporated herein by reference.

License Agreement effective as of October 16, 2007 between Research Frontiers Incorporated and Glass
Wholesalers, Ltd. d/b/a Craftsman Fabricated Glass, Ltd. Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 18, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference.

10.48

10.49

10.50

10.51

10.52

10.53

10.54

10.55

10.56

10.57

License Agreement effective as of December 14, 2007 between Research Frontiers Incorporated and AGC
Flat Glass Europe SA. Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated
December 17, 2007 with portions omitted pursuant to the Registrant’s request for confidential treatment
and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and incorporated herein by reference.

License Agreement effective as of February 21, 2008 between Research Frontiers Incorporated and GKN
Aerospace Transparency Systems Inc. Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on
Form 8-K dated March 5, 2008 with portions omitted pursuant to the Registrant’s request for confidential
treatment and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and incorporated herein by
reference.

License Agreement effective as of September 29, 2008 between Research Frontiers Incorporated and PPG
Industries, Inc. (now known as Pittsburgh Glass Works, LLC). Previously filed as an Exhibit to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 6, 2008 with portions omitted pursuant to the
Registrant’s request for confidential treatment and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, and incorporated herein by reference.

License Agreement effective as of September 10, 2009 between Research Frontiers Incorporated and
Pilkington Group Ltd. Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated
September 15, 2009 with portions omitted pursuant to the Registrant’s request for confidential treatment
and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and incorporated herein by reference.

License Agreement effective as of January 25, 2010 between Research Frontiers Incorporated and Vision
Systems. Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 25,
2010 with portions omitted pursuant to the Registrant’s request for confidential treatment and filed
separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and incorporated herein by reference.

License Agreement effective as of February 8, 2010 between Research Frontiers Incorporated and ID
Research Pty Ltd. (iGlass). Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K
dated February 16, 2010 with portions omitted pursuant to the Registrant’s request for confidential
treatment and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and incorporated herein by
reference.

License Agreement effective as of December 13, 2010 between Research Frontiers Incorporated and
Diamond Sea-Glaze Manufacturing Ltd. Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report
on Form 8-K dated December 14, 2010 with portions omitted pursuant to the Registrant’s request for
confidential treatment and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and incorporated
herein by reference.

License Agreement effective as of December 22, 2010 between Daimler AG, Research Frontiers
Incorporated and SPD Control Systems Corp. Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K dated February 9, 2011 with portions omitted pursuant to the Registrant’s request for
confidential treatment and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and incorporated
herein by reference.

License Agreement effective as of February 19, 2013 between Tint-It JSC and Research Frontiers
Incorporated. Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 5,
2013 with portions omitted pursuant to the Registrant’s request for confidential treatment and filed
separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and incorporated herein by reference.

License Agreement effective as of August 6, 2012 between Advnanotech LLC and Research Frontiers
Incorporated. Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March
12, 2013 with portions omitted pursuant to the Registrant’s request for confidential treatment and filed
separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and incorporated herein by reference.

Code of Ethics of Research Frontiers Incorporated. Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference.

Subsidiaries of the Registrant - SPD Enterprises, Inc.

Consent of BDO USA, LLP - Filed herewith.

31.1

31.2

32.1

32.2

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Joseph M. Harary - Filed herewith.

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Seth L. Van Voorhees - Filed herewith.

Section 1350 Certification of Joseph M. Harary - Filed herewith.

Section 1350 Certification of Seth L. Van Voorhees - Filed herewith.

EX-101.INS XBRL INSTANCE DOCUMENT

EX-101.SCH XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION SCHEMA

EX-101.PRE XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION PRESENTATION LINKBASE

EX-101.LAB XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION LABEL LINKBASE

EX-101.CAL XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION CALCULATION LINKBASE

EX-101.DEF XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION DEFINITION LINKBASE

* Executive Compensation Plan or Arrangement.

ITEM 16. Form 10-K Summary

None.

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has

duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

SIGNATURES

RESEARCH FRONTIERS INCORPORATED

(Registrant)

/s/ Joseph M. Harary
Joseph M. Harary, President and CEO
(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ Seth L. Van Voorhees
Seth L. Van Voorhees, Vice President, CFO and Treasurer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Dated: March 13, 2018

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the

following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

Signature

/s/ Darryl Daigle
Darryl Daigle

/s/ Gregory G. Grimes
Gregory G. Grimes

/s/ Joseph M. Harary
Joseph M. Harary

/s/ Alexander Kaganowicz
Alexander Kaganowicz

/s/ Seth L. Van Voorhees
Seth L. Van Voorhees

Position

Director

Date

March 13, 2018

Director, President, CEO

March 13, 2018

Director

March 13, 2018

Vice President, CFO, Treasurer

March 13, 2018

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Shareholders and Board of Directors
Research Frontiers Incorporated
Woodbury, New York

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Research Frontiers Incorporated as of
December 31, 2017 and 2016 and the related statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2017 and the related notes and schedule presented in Item 15 (collectively
referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public
accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are
required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the
applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of
material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to
perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an
understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the
effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated
financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures
include examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures within the consolidated financial
statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ BDO USA, LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditors since 2005.

Melville, New York
March 13, 2018

F-1

RESEARCH FRONTIERS INCORPORATED
Consolidated Balance Sheets
December 31, 2017 and 2016

2017

2016

Assets

Current assets:

Cash and cash equivalents .................................................................................... $
Short-term investments .........................................................................................
Royalties receivable, net of reserves of $1,051,424 in 2017 and $1,110,020 in
2016 ......................................................................................................................
Prepaid expenses and other current assets ............................................................

1,737,847 $
-

1,691,603
1,523,333

597,441
29,697

1,117,146
256,892

Total current assets ...........................................................................................

2,364,985

4,588,974

Fixed assets, net ........................................................................................................
Deposits and other assets ..........................................................................................
Total assets ........................................................................................................ $

482,561
33,567
2,881,113 $

651,655
33,567
5,274,196

Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity

Current liabilities:

Accounts payable .................................................................................................. $
Accrued expenses and other .................................................................................
Deferred revenue ..................................................................................................
Total current liabilities ......................................................................................

58,090 $
254,833
824
313,747

29,932
339,338
-
369,270

Shareholders’ equity:

Common stock, par value $0.0001 per share; authorized 100,000,000 shares,
2,404
issued and outstanding 24,043,846 in 2017 and 2016 ..........................................
Additional paid-in capital ..................................................................................... 111,627,789 111,551,490
Accumulated deficit .............................................................................................. (109,062,827 ) (106,648,968 )
4,904,926

Total shareholders’ equity.................................................................................

2,567,366

2,404

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity .......................................................... $

2,881,113 $

5,274,196

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-2

RESEARCH FRONTIERS INCORPORATED
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015

2017

2016

2015

Fee income ................................................................................. $

1,509,070 $

1,236,097 $

2,007,482

Operating expenses ....................................................................
Research and development ........................................................
Total Expenses .......................................................................

3,127,979
799,702
3,927,681

4,086,408
1,417,634
5,504,042

4,742,166
1,588,491
6,330,657

Operating loss ........................................................................

(2,418,611 )

(4,267,945 )

(4,323,175 )

Net investment income ..............................................................

4,752

29,535

43,319

Net loss .................................................................................. $

(2,413,859 ) $

(4,238,410 ) $

(4,279,856 )

Basic and diluted net loss per common share ............................ $

(0.10 ) $

(0.18 ) $

(0.18 )

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding ........

24,043,846

24,007,974

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-3

RESEARCH FRONTIERS INCORPORATED
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity
Years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015

Common Stock

Amount

Additional
Paid-in
Capital

Accumulated
Deficit

Total

Balance, December 31, 2014 . 23,924,465 $

2,392 $ 110,210,480 $ (98,130,702 ) $ 12,082,170

Exercise of options and
119,381
warrants .................................
-
Share-based compensation .....
Net Loss .................................
-
Balance, December 31, 2015 . 24,043,846

-
Share-based compensation .....
Net Loss .................................
-
Balance, December 31, 2016 . 24,043,846

-
Share-based compensation .....
Net Loss .................................
-
Balance, December 31, 2017 . 24,043,846 $

12
-
-

-
-
(4,279,856 )
2,404 111,483,959 (102,410,558 )

548,463
725,016
-

-
-

-
(4,238,410 )
2,404 111,551,490 (106,648,968 )

67,531
-

-
-

-
(2,413,859 )
2,404 $ 111,627,789 $ (109,062,827 ) $

76,299
-

548,475
725,016
(4,279,856 )
9,075,805

67,531
(4,238,410 )
4,904,926

76,299
(2,413,859 )
2,567,366

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-4

RESEARCH FRONTIERS INCORPORATED
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015

Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss ...................................................................................... $

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in
operating activities:

2017

2016

2015

(2,413,859 ) $

(4,238,410 ) $

(4,279,856 )

Depreciation and amortization ...........................................
Stock based compensation .................................................
Loss on sale of fixed asset .................................................
Bad debts, net of recovery .................................................

175,643
76,299
-
43,215

188,501
67,531
1,775
480,563

140,170
725,016
-
324,286

Change in assets and liabilities:

Royalty receivables ............................................................
Prepaid expenses and other current assets .........................
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other .................
Deferred revenue................................................................
Net cash used in operating activities ..................................

476,490
227,195
(56,347 )
824
(1,470,540 )

(283,035 )
(123,427 )
(98,941 )
-
(4,005,443 )

(463,743 )
(12,213 )
(14,472 )
-
(3,580,812 )

Cash flows from investing activities:

Purchases of fixed assets ........................................................
Proceeds from sale of fixed asset ...........................................
Proceeds from sale of investments .........................................
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities ...............

(6,549 )
-
1,523,333
1,516,784

(11,715 )
6,000
(9,549 )
(15,264 )

(316,185 )

1,491,295
1,175,110

Cash flows from financing activities:
Net proceeds from issuances of common stock and exercise of
options and warrants ..................................................................
Net cash provided by financing activities ..............................

-
-

548,475
548,475

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents ................

46,244

(4,020,707 )

(1,857,227 )

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year ........................
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year ................................... $

1,691,603
1,737,847 $

5,712,310
1,691,603 $

7,569,537
5,712,310

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-5

RESEARCH FRONTIERS INCORPORATED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(1) Business and Basis for Presentation

Research Frontiers Incorporated (“Research Frontiers” or the “Company”) operates in a single business segment
which is engaged in the development and marketing of technology and devices to control the flow of light. Such devices,
often referred to as “light valves” or suspended particle devices (SPDs), use colloidal particles that are either incorporated
within a liquid suspension or a film, which is usually enclosed between two sheets of glass or plastic having transparent,
electrically conductive coatings on the facing surfaces thereof. At least one of the two sheets is transparent. SPD
technology, made possible by a flexible light-control film invented by Research Frontiers, allows the user to instantly and
precisely control the shading of glass/plastic manually or automatically. SPD technology has numerous product
applications, including: SPD-Smart™ windows, sunshades, skylights and interior partitions for homes and buildings;
automotive windows, sunroofs, sun-visors, sunshades, rear-view mirrors, instrument panels and navigation systems;
aircraft windows; museum display panels, eyewear products; and flat panel displays for electronic products. SPD-Smart
light control film is now being developed for, or used in, architectural, automotive, marine, aerospace and appliance
applications.

The Company has historically utilized its cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments, and the proceeds from
the sale of its investments to fund its research and development of SPD light valves, for marketing initiatives, and for other
working capital purposes. The Company’s working capital and capital requirements depend upon numerous factors,
including the results of research and development activities, competitive and technological developments, the timing and
cost of patent filings, and the development of new licensees and changes in the Company’s relationships with its existing
licensees. The degree of dependence of the Company’s working capital requirements on each of the foregoing factors
cannot be quantified; increased research and development activities and related costs would increase such requirements;
the addition of new licensees may provide additional working capital or working capital requirements, and changes in
relationships with existing licensees would have a favorable or negative impact depending upon the nature of such changes.
We have incurred recurring losses since inception and expect to continue to incur losses as a result of costs and expenses
related to our research and continued development of our SPD technology and our corporate general and administrative
expenses. Our limited capital resources and operations to date have been substantially funded through sales of our common
stock, exercise of options and warrants and royalty fees collected. As of December 31, 2017, we had working capital of
approximately $2.1 million, cash of approximately $1.7 million, shareholders’ equity of approximately $2.6 million and
an accumulated deficit of approximately $109.1 million. Our quarterly projected cash flow shortfall, based on our current
operations adjusted for any non-recurring cash expenses for the next 12 months, is approximately $350,000-450,000 per
quarter. We may eliminate some operating expenses in the future, which will further reduce our cash flow shortfall if
needed. Based on the expected benefit of expense reductions and the recently completed convertible debt offering detailed
in the Subsequent Event section of this report, we expect to have sufficient working capital for the next 18 months of
operations. Since last year we have reduced our cash shortfall and are working to further reduce it and may seek new
sources of financing.

In the event that we are unable to generate sufficient cash from our operating activities or raise additional funds,
we may be required to delay, reduce or severely curtail our operations or otherwise impede our on-going business efforts,
which could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, financial condition and long-term prospects.
The Company may seek to obtain additional funding through future equity issuances. There can be no assurance as to the
availability or terms upon which such financing and capital might be available. Eventual success of the Company and
generation of positive cash flow will be dependent upon the commercialization of products using the Company’s
technology by the Company’s licensees and payments of continuing royalties on account thereof. To date, the Company
has not generated sufficient revenue from its licensees to fund its operations.

(2) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

(a) Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers securities purchased with original maturities of three months or less to be cash
equivalents. Cash equivalents consist of short-term investments in money market accounts at December 31, 2017 and 2016.

Cash and cash equivalents are maintained at financial institutions and, at times, balances may exceed federally
insured limits. We have never experienced any losses related to these balances. FDIC insurance coverage is $250,000 per
depositor at each financial institution, and our non-interest bearing cash balances may again exceed federally insured limits.
Amounts on deposit in excess of federally insured limits at December 31, 2017 and 2016 is approximately $1.0 million
and $1.0 million, respectively.

F-6

(b) Short-term/Long-term Investments

The Company classifies investments in marketable securities as trading, available-for-sale or held-to-maturity at
the time of purchase and periodically re-evaluates such classifications. Trading securities are carried at fair value, with
unrealized holding gains and losses included in earnings. Held-to-maturity securities are recorded at cost and are adjusted
for the amortization or accretion of premiums or discounts over the life of the related security. Unrealized holding gains
and losses on available-for-sale securities are excluded from earnings and are reported as a separate component of
accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) until realized. In determining realized gains and losses, the cost of
securities sold is based on the specific identification method. Interest and dividends on the investments are accrued at the
balance sheet date. At December 31, 2017 and 2016 all investments were classified as held to maturity and consisted of
the following:

Certificates of Deposit
Investment

Maturity

Date

December 31, 2017
Value of Held to Maturity
Investments (based on cost)

December 31, 2016
Value of Held to Maturity
Investments (based on cost)

1,523,333

2/23/2017 $

- $

1,523,333

The Company elected to transfer the Certificates of Deposit investment that matured on February 23, 2017 to a

money market account.

Royalties receivable from licensees are recorded at the amounts specified within the license agreements when the
collectability of the receivable is reasonably assured. The allowance for doubtful accounts is the Company’s best estimate
of the amount of probable credit losses in the Company’s existing royalties receivable. The Company determines the
allowance based on historical write off experience as well as the current status of the Company’s customers. The Company
reviews its allowance for doubtful accounts periodically. Past due accounts are reviewed individually for collectability.
Account balances are charged off against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential
for recovery is considered remote. As of December 31, 2017 four companies accounted for 33%, 25%, 17% and 11%,
respectively, of the Company’s outstanding receivables. As of December 31, 2016, four companies accounted for 28%,
21%, 13% and 10%, respectively, of the Company’s outstanding receivables.

(d) Fixed Assets

Fixed assets are carried at cost. Depreciation and amortization are computed using the straight-line method over

the estimated useful lives of the assets.

(e) Revenue Recognition/Fee Income

The Company has entered into a number of license agreements covering its light control technology. The
Company receives minimum annual royalties under certain license agreements and records fee income on a ratable basis
each quarter. In instances when sales of licensed products by its licensees exceed minimum annual royalties, the Company
recognizes additional fee income as the amounts have been earned. Certain of the fees are accrued by, or paid to, the
Company in advance of the period in which they are earned resulting in deferred revenue. Such excess amounts are recorded
as deferred revenue and are typically recognized as fee income when earned. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, deferred
revenue balances were immaterial.

Fee income represents amounts earned by the Company under various license and other agreements (note 7)
relating to technology developed by the Company. During 2017, four licensees accounted for 35%, 15%, 10%, and 9%,
respectively of fee income recognized during the year. During 2016 three licensees accounted for 30%, 27%, and 15%,
respectively of fee income recognized for the year. During 2015, three licensees accounted for 33%, 15%, and 9%,
respectively, of fee income recognized for the year. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2015, approximately
14% of revenues related to fees generated by a large architectural glass project.

F-7

(f) Basic and Diluted Loss Per Common Share

Basic earnings (loss) per share excludes any dilution. It is based upon the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding during the period. Dilutive earnings (loss) per share reflects the potential dilution that would occur if
securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock. The Company’s
dilutive loss per share equals basic loss per share for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2017
because all common stock equivalents (i.e., options and warrants) were antidilutive in those periods. The number of options
and warrants that were not included because their effect is antidilutive was 1,436,910, 2,082,229, and 2,197,369, for 2017,
2016, and 2015, respectively.

(g) Research and Development Costs

Research and development costs are charged to expense as incurred.

(h) Patent Costs

The Company expenses costs relating to the development or acquisition of patents due to the uncertainty of the

recoverability of these items.

(i) Use of Estimates

The preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements requires management of the Company to
make a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reported amount of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during this period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

(j) Income Taxes

Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of
existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carry-forwards. Deferred tax
assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to be recovered or settled.

On December 22, 2017, The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (Act) was enacted into law. The Act provides for significant
changes to the US Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, that impact corporate taxation requirements, such as the
reduction of the federal tax rate for corporations from 35% to 21% and changes or limitations to certain tax deductions.
The reduction in the corporate tax rate under the Act required a one-time revaluation of certain tax-related assets to reflect
their value at the lower corporate tax rate of 21%. As such, the Company reduced the value of these assets by approximately
$10 million which primarily relates to the Company’s net operating loss carryforward. As the Company has determined in
accordance with ASC 740 that it is not more likely than not that it will realize this future tax benefit, the reduction in the
asset value was accompanied by a reduction for a like amount in the associated valuation allowance. In December 2017,
the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, Income Tax Accounting Implications of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
(“SAB 118”), which allows the Company to record provisional amounts during a measurement period not to extend beyond
one year from the enactment date. Since the Tax Act was passed late in the fourth quarter of 2017, and ongoing guidance
and accounting interpretation is expected over the next 12 months, the Company considers the accounting of the deferred
tax re-measurements, and other items to be provisional due to the forthcoming guidance and its ongoing analysis of final
year-end data and tax positions. The Company expects to complete its analysis within the measurement period in
accordance with SAB 118.

In accordance with ASC Topic 740 (FIN 48), we recognize tax benefits only for tax positions that are more likely
than not to be sustained upon examination by tax authorities. The amount recognized is measured as the largest amount of
benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement. Unrecognized tax benefits are tax
benefits claimed in tax returns that do not meet these recognition and measurement standards. We classify accrued interest
and penalties related to any unrecognized tax benefits in our income tax provision. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, we
do not have accrued interest and penalties related to any unrecognized tax benefits. We do not believe we have any uncertain
tax positions as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.

The tax years subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions include the years 2013 and forward by the U.S.

Internal Revenue Service and certain states. The Company is not currently being audited by any tax jurisdiction.

F-8

(k) Equity-Based Compensation

We recognize all stock-based compensation as an expense in the financial statements and such costs are measured
at the fair value of the award at the date of grant. In addition to reflecting compensation expense for new share-based
payment awards, expense is also recognized to reflect the remaining vesting period of awards that had been granted in prior
periods. Tax benefits related to stock option exercises are reflected as financing cash inflows.

The exercise price for stock options granted are generally set at the average for the high and low trading prices of
the Company’s common stock on the trading date immediately prior to the date of grant, and the related number of shares
granted are fixed at the date of grant.

In order to determine the fair value of stock options on the date of grant, the Company uses the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model. Inherent in this model are assumptions related to expected stock-price volatility, option term, risk-
free interest rate and dividend yield. While the risk-free interest rate and dividend yield are less subjective assumptions
that are based on factual data derived from public sources, the expected stock-price volatility and option term assumptions
require a greater level of judgment.

In connection with employee stock options and restricted stock grants, the Company charged to compensation
expense $76,299, $67,531 and $715,009, during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. As of
December 31, 2017 these awards were fully vested. In lieu of higher cash compensation, the Company has granted warrants
and non-employee options to consultants. These warrants and non-employee options vested ratably over various terms
ranging from 24 to 59 months. Non-employee options covering 24,000 shares were granted to consultants during 2014.
These non-employee options are valued at fair value at the time that the related services are provided using the Black
Scholes method and marked to market quarterly using the Black Scholes method. The Company incurred a charge to
operations of $10,007 in 2015 in connection with these warrants and non-employee options. There were no such charges
for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.

(l) Restricted Stock

Compensation cost for restricted stock is measured using the quoted market price of the Company’s common
stock at the date the common stock is granted. The compensation cost is recognized over the period between the issue date
and the vesting period for such shares. Restricted stock is included in total common shares outstanding upon the lapse of
any vesting conditions.

(m) Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company reviews long-lived assets to determine whether an event or change in circumstances indicates the
carrying value of the asset may not be recoverable. The Company bases its evaluation on such impairment indicators as
the nature of the assets, the future economic benefit of the assets and any historical or future profitability measurements,
as well as other external market conditions or factors that may be present. There was no impairment of long-lived assets
recorded during the years ended 2017, 2016 and 2015.

(n) Fair Value Measurements

The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current
transaction between willing parties. The carrying amounts of all financial instruments classified as a current asset or current
liability are deemed to approximate fair value because of the short maturity of those instruments.

Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 820 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (“ASC Topic
820”) establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures
about fair value measurements. ASC Topic 820 applies other previously issued accounting pronouncements that require or
permit fair value measurements but does not require any new fair value measurements.

ASC Topic 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability
in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC Topic 820 establishes a fair value
hierarchy that distinguishes between (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from
independent sources (observable inputs) and (2) an entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions
developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs).

F-9

We value financial instruments using a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in
measuring fair value. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for
identical assets or liabilities; Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active
markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no
market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions.

As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the fair value of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities including cash
and cash equivalents, royalty receivables and accounts payable approximated carrying value due to the short-term maturity
of these instruments.

(o) Recent Accounting Pronouncements

New Accounting Standards

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and the International Accounting Standards
Board (IASB) jointly issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers
(Topic 606), which clarifies the principles for recognizing revenue and develops a common revenue standard for GAAP
and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should
recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the
consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods and services. In July 2015, the FASB
approved a deferral of the ASU effective date from annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016 to
annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company will adopt the new revenue standard on a
modified retrospective basis as of January 1, 2018. The Company has not yet completed its assessment of the impact of
adopting the new revenue standard. The Company’s preliminary assessment has identified one revenue stream and has
identified three performance obligations in each of our contracts with customers. The Company is currently analyzing the
allocation of transaction price to each performance obligation and the pattern of recognition of revenue. The Company is
also assessing the new disclosure requirements.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, “Financial Instruments—Overall (Subtopic 825-10):
Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities,” which amends the guidance in U.S. GAAP
on the classification and measurement of financial instruments. Changes to the current guidance primarily affects the
accounting for equity investments, financial liabilities under the fair value option, and the presentation and disclosure
requirements for financial instruments. In addition, the ASU clarifies guidance related to the valuation allowance
assessment when recognizing deferred tax assets resulting from unrealized losses on available-for-sale debt securities. The
new standard is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and upon adoption, an
entity should apply the amendments by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to the balance sheet at the beginning of
the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective. Early adoption is not permitted except for the provision to
record fair value changes for financial liabilities under the fair value option resulting from instrument-specific credit risk
in other comprehensive income. The Company does not expect the application of this guidance to have a significant impact
on its financial position or results of operations.

In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Updated
(“ASU”) No. 2016-02, Leases. ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to apply a modified retrospective transition approach for
leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial
statements. Early adoption of the new guidance is permitted. While not yet in a position to assess the full impact of this
application of the new standard, the Company expects that the impact of recording the lease liabilities and the corresponding
right to use assets will have an impact on its total asset and liabilities with a minimal impact on equity.

In June 2016 the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement
of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments” (ASU 2016-13), that requires entities to use a new impairment model based on
expected losses. Under this new model an entity would recognize an impairment allowance equal to its current estimate of
credit losses on financial assets measured at amortized cost. ASU 2016-13 is effective for us beginning January 1, 2020
with early adoption permitted January 1, 2019. We are currently evaluating new processes to calculate credit losses in
accordance with ASU 2016-13 that, once completed, will determine the impact on our consolidated financial statements.
The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the provisions of this standard.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain
Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, which addresses eight specific cash flow issues with the objective of reducing diversity
in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15
is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those
fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the provisions of this standard.

F-10

(3) Fixed Assets

Depreciation and amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 was $175,643,
$188,501 and $140,170, respectively. Fixed assets and their estimated useful lives as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 are
as follows:

Equipment and furniture .............. $
Trade show materials ...................

Leasehold Improvements .............

Less accumulated depreciation
and amortization ..........................
$

(4) Accrued Expenses and Other

2017

2016

Estimated useful life

1,372,449 $
775,654

584,967
2,733,070

1,366,401
775,654

5 years
5 years

Life of lease or estimated

584,466
2,726,521

life of asset if shorter

(2,250,509 )
482,561 $

(2,074,866 )
651,655

Accrued expenses consist of the following at December 31, 2017 and 2016:

Payroll, bonuses and related benefits ................................ $
Professional services .........................................................
Deferred rent .....................................................................
Other ..................................................................................
$

47,932 $
4,400
202,141
360
254,833 $

128,246
4,400
206,332
360
339,338

2017

2016

(5) Income Taxes

Since inception, the Company has incurred losses from operations and as a result has not recorded income tax
expense. Benefits related to net operating loss carry-forwards and deferred items have been fully reserved since it is not
more likely than not that the Company will achieve profitable operations. For the year ended December 31, 2017, the
difference between the total income taxes at the federal statutory rate and the fact that there was no tax expense is
attributable to both the federal rate reduction that was enacted as a part of the Act on December 22, 2017 as well as the
change in the valuation allowance due to the net operating loss for the current year. The difference between the total income
taxes at the federal statutory rate for each of the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 and the fact that no income tax
benefit was recorded in each of these years is attributable to the change in the valuation allowance recorded in each year.

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets at December
31, 2017 and 2016 are presented below and reflect the new federal statutory rate enacted in 2017. The 2017 deferred tax
amount were adjusted for the effects of the new federal statutory rates.

2017

2016

Deferred tax assets:

Depreciation ................................................................... $
Allowance for bad debts .................................................
Net operating loss carry-forwards ..................................
Stock option expense ......................................................
Research and other credits ..............................................
Other temporary differences ...........................................
Total gross deferred tax assets ....................................
Less valuation allowance ................................................
$

89,000 $
225,000
15,575,000
257,000
1,266,000
15,000
17,427,000
(17,427,000 )
- $

116,000
393,000
24,916,000
1,272,000
1,210,000
15,000
27,922,000
(27,922,000 )
-

F-11

In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, the Company considers whether it is more likely than not that
some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent
upon future taxable income during the period in which those temporary differences become deductible. The Company
considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in
making this assessment. Based upon its historical operating losses, utilization of deferred tax assets cannot currently be
determined. Accordingly, the Company has recorded a full valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets, due to the
uncertainty regarding the future utilization of the deferred tax assets for all periods presented.

At December 31, 2017, the Company had a net operating loss carry-forward for federal income tax purposes of
approximately $73,000,000, varying amounts of which will expire in each year from 2018 through 2037. Research and
other credit carry-forwards of approximately $1,266,000 are available to the Company to reduce income taxes payable in
future years principally through 2037. The Company’s ability to utilize its net operating loss carryforwards and its current
year tax credits in future periods are subject to the 382 limitation.

(6) Shareholders’ Equity

(a) Common Stock and Warrants

During 2015, the Company received $548,475 in proceeds from the exercise of warrants. The Company received

no proceeds from the exercise of options and warrants during 2017 and 2016.

(b) Options and Warrants

(i) Employee Options

In 2008, the shareholders approved the Company’s 2008 Equity Incentive Plan which provides for the granting
of both incentive stock options at the fair market value at the date of grant and nonqualified stock options at the fair market
value at the date of grant to employees or non-employees who, in the determination of the Board of Directors, have made
or may make significant contributions to the Company in the future. The Company may also award stock appreciation
rights, restricted stock, or restricted stock units under this plan. The Company initially reserved 750,000 shares of its
common stock for issuance under this plan, and 150,182 options and other awards were available for issuance under this
plan as of December 31, 2017.

At the discretion of the Board of Directors, options expire in ten years or less from the date of grant and are
generally fully exercisable upon grant but in some cases may be subject to vesting in the future. Full payment of the exercise
price may be made in cash or in shares of common stock valued at the fair market value thereof on the date of exercise, or
by agreeing with the Company to cancel a portion of the exercised options.

The Company granted 204,000 fully vested options during 2015 and recorded share-based compensation of
$483,915. The Company granted 85,250 fully vested options during 2016 and recorded share-based compensation of
$67,531. The Company granted 158,000 fully vested options during 2017 and recorded share-based compensation of
$76,299. The Company valued these grants using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted
average assumptions:

2017

2016

2015

Fair value on grant date ............................... $
Expected Dividend yield .............................
Expected volatility .......................................
Risk free interest rate ...................................
Expected term of the option ........................

0.48 $
-
50 %
2.20 %
5 years

0.79 $
-
47 %
1.93 %
5 years

2.37
-
50 %
1.80 %

5 years

Activity for stock options is summarized below:

All options are exercisable at December 31, 2017.

In 2017, 2016 and 2015, the Company did not receive proceeds from the exercise of options.

F-12

Number of
Shares

Subject to Option

Weighted Average
Exercise
Price

Weighted Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term (Years)

Aggregate Intrinsic
Value

Balance at December 31, 2014 .

1,570,799 $

Granted .....................................
Cancelled ..................................
Exercised ..................................
Balance at December 31, 2015 .

Granted .....................................
Cancelled ..................................
Exercised ..................................
Balance at December 31, 2016 .

Granted .....................................
Cancelled ..................................
Exercised ..................................
Balance at December 31, 2017 .

204,000 $
(367,793 ) $
- $
1,407,006 $

85,250 $
(200,390 ) $
- $
1,291,866 $

158,000 $
(470,956 ) $
- $
978,910 $

(ii) Warrants and Non-Employee Options

Activity in warrants is summarized below:

7.49

5.26
7.70
-
7.11

1.83
5.89
-
6.96

1.06
10.57
-
4.26

5.2

6.2

6.2 $

7.1 $

Number of Shares
Underlying
Warrants and Non-
Employee
Options Granted

Weighted Average

Exercise Price

Balance at December 31, 2014 ..................................................

1,353,620 $

Exercised ...................................................................................
Terminated .................................................................................
Issued .........................................................................................
Balance at December 31, 2015 ..................................................

Exercised ...................................................................................
Terminated .................................................................................
Issued .........................................................................................
Balance at December 31, 2016 ..................................................

Exercised ...................................................................................
Terminated .................................................................................
Issued .........................................................................................
Balance at December 31, 2017 ..................................................

(137,174 )
(426,083 )
0
790,363 $

0
0
-
790,363 $

0
(332,363 )
-
458,000 $

5.64

4.73
6.09
0.00
5.56

0.00
0.00

5.56

0.00
4.36

6.43

In lieu of cash compensation, the Company has granted warrants and non-employee options to consultants. These
warrants and non-employee options vested ratably over various terms ranging from 12 to 59 months. Non-employee five
year options covering 24,000 shares were granted to consultants during 2014 that vested over a period of 12 months. These
non-employee options are valued at fair value at the time that the related services are provided using the Black-Scholes
option valuation model and marked to market quarterly using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. The Company
incurred a charge to operations of $10,007 for 2015 in connection with these warrants and non-employee options. There
were no such charges in 2017 and 2016.

Warrants and non-employee options generally expire from five to ten years from the date of issuance. At

December 31, 2017, all warrants and non-employee options outstanding were exercisable.

F-13

During 2017, 2016, and 2015, the Company did not issue restricted stock to its directors and employees.

In connection with prior grants of restricted stock to its directors and employees the Company charged $231,876,

to operations during 2015. There were no such charges during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.

(7) License and Other Agreements

The Company has entered into a number of license agreements covering various products using the Company’s
SPD technology. Some of these license agreements are limited to specific countries and/or markets. Licensees of Research
Frontiers who incorporate SPD technology into end products pay Research Frontiers an earned royalty of 5-15% of net
sales of licensed products under license agreements currently in effect, and may also be required to pay Research Frontiers
fees and minimum annual royalties. Licensees who sell products or components to other licensees of Research Frontiers
do not pay a royalty on such sale; Research Frontiers will collect such royalty from the licensee incorporating such products
or components into its own end-products. Research Frontiers’ license agreements typically allow the licensee to terminate
the license after some period of time, and give Research Frontiers only limited rights to terminate before the license expires.
Most licenses are non-exclusive and generally last as long as our patents remain in effect.

(8) Commitments

The Company has an employment agreement with two of its officers which provides for an annual base salary of
$450,000 and $255,000 respectively for calendar year 2018. Each of these employment agreements have an evergreen
provision that extend the term by one year on the anniversary date unless either the Company or the employee has given
notice that they will not be renewing the agreement upon the expiration of its term.

The Company has a defined contribution profit sharing (401K) plan covering employees who have completed one
year of service. Contributions are made at the discretion of the Company. The Company did not make any contributions to
this plan for 2017, 2016, or 2015.

The Company occupies premises under an operating lease agreement which expires on March 31, 2025. As of
December 31, 2017, the approximate minimum annual future rental commitments under lease agreements for the next five
years are as follows:

Year
Amount
2018 .......................... $ 186,000
2019 .......................... $ 191,000
2020 .......................... $ 197,000
2021 .......................... $ 199,000
Thereafter: ................. $ 707,000

Rent expense, including other occupancy related expenses, amounted to approximately $185,000, $184,000, and

$181,000, for 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively.

(9) Rights Plan

F-14

(10) Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

2017
Fee Income ................................................................. $
Operating loss .............................................................
Net loss .......................................................................
Basic and diluted net loss............................................
per common share (1) ...................................................

Quarter

First

Second

Third

Fourth (2)

393,116 $
(954,432 )
(952,555 )

348,179 $
(490,652 )
(489,812 )

488,336 $
(304,251 )
(303,138 )

279,439
(669,276 )
(668,354 )

(0.04 )

(0.02 )

(0.01 )

(0.03 )

2016
Fee Income ................................................................. $
Operating loss .............................................................
Net loss .......................................................................
Basic and diluted net loss............................................
per common share (1) ...................................................

Quarter

First

Second

Third

Fourth (2)

409,133 $
(1,187,591 )
(1,176,693 )

244,432 $
(1,124,730 )
(1,116,758 )

304,772 $
(566,063 )
(559,731 )

277,760
(1,389,561 )
(1,385,228 )

(0.06 )

(0.05 )

(0.02 )

(0.06 )

(1) Since per share information is computed independently for each quarter and the full year, based on the
respective average number of common shares outstanding, the sum of the quarterly per share amounts
does not necessarily equal the per share amounts for the year.

(2) The Company incurred higher costs in the fourth quarter of 2017 and 2016 due to: (i) $76,000 and $68,000
of stock and option compensation charges in 2017 and 2016, respectively, relating to common stock and
options granted to directors and employees, and $480,563 of bad debt expense recorded in the fourth
quarter of 2016.

(11) Subsequent Event

F-15

SCHEDULE II

RESEARCH FRONTIERS INCORPORATED
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
Years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015

Balance at
beginning of
period

Charged to cost
and expenses Deductions (1)

End of
period balance

Description

Allowance for uncollectible royalty receivables:

December 31, 2017 ............................................... $

1,110,020 $

43,215 $

101,811 $

1,051,424

December 31, 2016 ............................................... $

629,457 $

480,563 $

- $

1,110,020

December 31, 2015 ............................................... $

305,171 $

324,286 $

- $

629,457

(1) To write-off uncollectible receivables from the allowance for royalty receivable account.

F-16

Subsidiary of the Registrant:

SPD Enterprises, Inc. (a)

(a) SPD Enterprises, Inc. also conducts its business under VariGuard SmartGlass.

Exhibit 21

State or Country of
Organization

Delaware

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Exhibit 23

The Board of Directors
Research Frontiers Incorporated:

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-184785,
333-179099, 333-133858, 333-40369, 333-115052, 333-65219 and 333-159093) and Form S-8 (No. 333-80575, 333-
179097, 33-53030, 33-86910, 333-08623, 333-34163, 333-80575, 333-63374, 333-106754, 333-159094 and 333-196746)
of Research Frontiers Incorporated of our report dated March 13, 2018, relating to the consolidated financial statements
and the financial statement presented in Item 15 which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

/s/ BDO USA, LLP
Melville, NY

March 13, 2018

EXHIBIT 31.1

I, Joseph M. Harary, certify that:

CERTIFICATION

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Research Frontiers Incorporated (the “registrant”);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer’s and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to
be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer’s and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in

the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Dated: March 13, 2018

/s/ Joseph M. Harary
Joseph M. Harary
President, Chief Executive Officer

EXHIBIT 31.2

I, Seth L. Van Voorhees, certify that:

CERTIFICATION

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Research Frontiers Incorporated (the “registrant”);

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in

the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Dated: March 13, 2018

/s/ Seth L. Van Voorhees
Seth L. Van Voorhees
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
Treasurer and Principal Accounting Officer

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

EXHIBIT 32.1

In connection with the Annual Report of Research Frontiers Incorporated (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Joseph M. Harary, President and Chief Executive Officer and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition

and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Joseph M. Harary
Joseph M. Harary
President, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Executive
Officer
March 13, 2018

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

EXHIBIT 32.2

In connection with the Annual Report of Research Frontiers Incorporated (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Seth L. Van Voorhees, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Principal Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition

and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Seth L. Van Voorhees
Seth L. Van Voorhees
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
Treasurer and Principal Accounting Officer

March 13, 2018

(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)

(cid:1)