Revlon, Inc.
Annual Report 1999

Plain-text annual report

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K FOR ANNUAL AND TRANSITION REPORTS PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (Mark One) X ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999 OR TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from __________________ to __________________ Commission file number 1-11178 REVLON, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) DELAWARE (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) 625 Madison Avenue, New York, New York (Address of principal executive offices) 13-3662955 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 10022 (Zip Code) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (212) 527-4000 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) or 12(g) of the Act: Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered Class A Common Stock New York Stock Exchange, Inc. Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [X] As of March 8, 2000, 19,992,837 shares of Class A Common Stock and 31,250,000 shares of Class B Common Stock were outstanding. 11,250,000 shares of Class A Common Stock and all of the shares of Class B Common Stock were held by REV Holdings Inc., an indirectly wholly owned subsidiary of Mafco Holdings Inc. The aggregate market value of the registrant’s Class A Common Stock held by non-affiliates (using New York Stock Exchange, Inc. closing price as of March 8, 2000) was approximately $96,171,207. REVLON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULE Page Independent Auditors’ Report .................................................................................................................................. .F-2 Audited Financial Statements: Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 1999 and 1998..................................................................... .F-3 Consolidated Statements of Operations for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1999.................................................................................................................. .F-4 Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Deficiency and Comprehensive Loss for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1999 .......................................................................................... .F-5 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1999.................................................................................................................. .F-6 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements....................................................................................................... .F-7 Financial Statement Schedule: Schedule II--Valuation and Qualifying Accounts............................................................................................... .F-32 F-1 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT The Board of Directors and Stockholders Revlon, Inc.: We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Revlon, Inc. and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ deficiency and comprehensive loss and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1999. In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements we have also audited the financial statement schedule as listed on the index on page F-1. These consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Revlon, Inc. and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 1998 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1999, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein. KPMG LLP New York, New York March 30, 2000 F-2 REVLON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (dollars in millions, except per share data) Current assets: ASSETS Cash and cash equivalents.............................................................. Trade receivables, less allowances of $27.2 and $28.5, respectively........................................................... Inventories...................................................................................... Prepaid expenses and other............................................................ Total current assets................................................................. Property, plant and equipment, net........................................................ Other assets........................................................................................... Intangible assets, net............................................................................. Total assets............................................................................. LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIENCY Current liabilities: Short-term borrowings - third parties............................................. Current portion of long-term debt - third parties............................ Accounts payable........................................................................... Accrued expenses and other........................................................... Total current liabilities............................................................ Long-term debt - third parties .............................................................. Long-term debt - affiliates..................................................................... Other long-term liabilities..................................................................... Stockholders' deficiency: Preferred stock, par value $.01 per share; 20,000,000 shares authorized, 546 shares of Series A Preferred Stock issued and outstanding............................................................ Class B Common Stock, par value $.01 per share; 200,000,000 shares authorized, 31,250,000 issued and outstanding........... Class A Common Stock, par value $.01 per share; 350,000,000 shares authorized, 19,992,837 and 19,986,771 issued and outstanding, respectively........................................................ Capital deficiency........................................................................... Accumulated deficit since June 24, 1992....................................... Accumulated other comprehensive loss......................................... Total stockholders' deficiency................................................ Total liabilities and stockholders' deficiency.......................... December 31, 1999 December 31, 1998 $ 25.4 $ 34.7 332.6 278.3 51.3 687.6 336.4 177.5 356.8 1,558.3 37.6 10.2 139.8 409.7 597.3 1,737.8 24.1 214.0 54.6 0.3 0.2 (228.4) (773.5) (68.1) (1,014.9) 1,558.3 $ $ $ 536.0 264.1 69.9 904.7 378.9 173.5 372.9 1,830.0 27.9 6.0 134.8 389.7 558.4 1,629.9 24.1 265.6 54.6 0.3 0.2 (228.5) (402.0) (72.6) (648.0) 1,830.0 $ $ $ See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. F-3 REVLON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (dollars in millions, except per share data) Year Ended December 31, 1998 1999 1997 Net sales............................................................................................... Cost of sales......................................................................................... Gross profit..................................................................................... Selling, general and administrative expenses....................................... Business consolidation costs and other, net......................................... $ $ 1,861.3 686.1 1,175.2 1,347.6 40.2 $ 2,252.2 765.7 1,486.5 1,328.8 33.1 2,238.6 743.1 1,495.5 1,277.0 3.6 Operating (loss) income ................................................................. (212.6) 124.6 214.9 Other expenses (income): Interest expense.............................................................................. Interest income............................................................................... Amortization of debt issuance costs............................................... Foreign currency (gains) losses, net............................................... Miscellaneous, net.......................................................................... Other expenses, net.................................................................. 147.9 (2.8) 4.3 (0.5) 0.9 149.8 (Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes......... (362.4) Provision for income taxes................................................................... 9.1 (Loss) income from continuing operations.......................................... (371.5) (Loss) income from discontinued operations....................................... Loss from disposal of discontinued operations.................................... Extraordinary items - early extinguishments of debt........................... - - - 137.9 (5.2) 5.1 4.6 4.5 146.9 (22.3) 5.0 (27.3) (16.5) (47.7) (51.7) Net (loss) income ................................................................................ $ (371.5) $ (143.2) $ Basic (loss) income per common share: (Loss) income from continuing operations................................... (Loss) income from discontinued operations................................ Extraordinary items....................................................................... Net (loss) income per common share............................................ Diluted (loss) income per common share: (Loss) income from continuing operations................................... (Loss) income from discontinued operations................................ Extraordinary items....................................................................... Net (loss) income per common share............................................ $ $ $ $ (7.25) - - (7.25) (7.25) - - (7.25) $ $ $ $ (0.53) (1.26) (1.01) (2.80) (0.53) (1.26) (1.01) (2.80) $ $ $ $ 133.7 (4.2) 6.6 6.4 5.3 147.8 67.1 9.3 57.8 0.7 - (14.9) 43.6 1.13 0.01 (0.29) 0.85 1.13 0.01 (0.29) 0.85 Weighted average number of common shares outstanding: Basic.............................................................................................. 51,240,225 51,217,997 Diluted........................................................................................... 51,240,225 51,217,997 51,131,440 51,544,318 See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. F-4 REVLON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIENCY AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS (dollars in millions) Balance, January 1, 1997........................................ $ Issuance of common stock................................ Net capital contribution..................................... Comprehensive income: Net income.............................................. Adjustment for minimum pension liability........................ Currency translation adjustment............. Total comprehensive income............................ Balance, December 31, 1997.................................. Issuance of common stock................................ Comprehensive loss: Net loss.................................................... Adjustment for minimum pension liability........................ Revaluation of marketable securities...... Currency translation adjustment............. Total comprehensive loss.................................. Balance, December 31, 1998.................................. Issuance of common stock................................ Comprehensive loss: Net loss.................................................... Adjustment for minimum pension liability........................ Revaluation of marketable securities...... Currency translation adjustment............. Total comprehensive loss.................................. Accumulated Other Preferred Common Stock Stock Capital Deficiency Accumulated Comprehensive Deficit (a) Loss (b) 54.6 $ 0.5 $ (231.6) $ 0.2 0.3 (c) (302.4) $ (18.2) $ 43.6 7.9 (13.4) 54.6 0.5 (231.1) 2.6 (258.8) (23.7) (143.2) (28.0) (3.0) (17.9) (d) 54.6 0.5 (228.5) 0.1 (402.0) (72.6) (371.5) 27.6 (0.8) (22.3) Total Stockholders' Deficiency (497.1) 0.2 0.3 43.6 7.9 (13.4) 38.1 (458.5) 2.6 (143.2) (28.0) (3.0) (17.9) (192.1) (648.0) 0.1 (371.5) 27.6 (0.8) (22.3) (367.0) Balance, December 31, 1999.................................. $ 54.6 $ 0.5 $ (228.4) $ (773.5) $ (68.1) $ (1,014.9) ____________________ (a) Represents net loss since June 24, 1992, the effective date of the transfer agreements referred to in Note 16. (b) Accumulated other comprehensive loss includes a revaluation of marketable securities of $3.8 and $3.0 for 1999 and 1998, respectively, currency translation adjustments of $59.4, $37.1 and $19.2 for 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively, and adjustments for the minimum pension liability of $4.9, $32.5 and $4.5 for 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively. (c) Represents changes in capital from the acquisition of the Bill Blass business (See Note 16). (d) Accumulated other comprehensive loss and comprehensive loss each include a reclassification adjustment of $2.2 for realized gains associated with the sale of certain assets outside the United States. See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. F-5 REVLON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (dollars in millions) Year Ended December 31, 1998 (143.2) $ $ 1999 (371.5) CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: Net (loss) income............................................................................ Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash $ (used for) provided by operating activities: Depreciation and amortization................................................... Loss (income) from discontinued operations............................ Extraordinary items................................................................... Loss (gain) on sale of certain assets, net.................................... Change in assets and liabilities: Decrease (increase) in trade receivables............................. Increase in inventories........................................................ Decrease (increase) in prepaid expenses and other current assets........................................... Increase (decrease) in accounts payable............................. Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses and other current liabilities............................................... Other, net............................................................................ Net cash (used for) provided by operating activities....................... CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: Capital expenditures........................................................................ Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired.............................. Proceeds from the sale of certain assets.......................................... Net cash used for investing activities.............................................. CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Net increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings - third parties.... Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt - third parties.......... Repayment of long-term debt - third parties................................... Net proceeds from issuance of common stock................................ Net contribution from parent........................................................... Proceeds from the issuance of debt - affiliates................................ Repayment of debt - affiliates......................................................... Payment of debt issuance costs....................................................... Net cash provided by financing activities....................................... Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents....... Net cash used by discontinued operations....................................... Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents................ Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period..................... Cash and cash equivalents at end of period............................... $ Supplemental schedule of cash flow information: Cash paid during the period for: 1997 43.6 99.7 (0.7) 14.9 (4.4) (70.0) (16.9) 0.4 17.9 (2.8) (73.0) 8.7 (52.3) (40.5) 8.5 (84.3) 18.0 760.2 (690.2) 0.2 0.3 120.7 (120.2) (4.1) 84.9 (3.6) (3.4) 2.3 35.1 37.4 139.6 10.5 132.7 (64.5) 68.2 126.1 - - 1.6 187.1 (22.5) 12.6 10.8 20.5 (47.5) (82.8) (42.3) - 1.6 (40.7) 12.3 574.5 (464.9) 0.1 - 67.1 (67.1) (3.5) 118.5 (4.3) - (9.3) 34.7 25.4 111.3 64.2 51.7 (8.4) (43.0) (4.6) (11.4) (49.2) 52.5 (71.4) (51.5) (60.8) (57.6) 27.4 (91.0) (16.3) 1,469.1 (1,270.9) 1.1 - 105.9 (105.9) (23.9) 159.1 (2.0) (17.3) (2.7) 37.4 34.7 133.4 10.9 74.5 (57.6) 16.9 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Interest ............................................................................... $ Income taxes, net of refunds............................................... 146.1 8.2 Supplemental schedule of noncash investing activities: In connection with business acquisitions, liabilities were assumed (including minority interest and discontinued operations) as follows: Fair value of assets acquired............................................... $ Cash paid............................................................................ Liabilities assumed............................................................. $ - - - See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. F-6 REVLON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (dollars in millions, except per share data) 1. Significant Accounting Policies Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation: Revlon, Inc. (and together with its subsidiaries, the “Company”) conducts its business exclusively through its direct subsidiary, Revlon Consumer Products Corporation and its subsidiaries (“Products Corporation”). The Company manufactures and sells an extensive array of cosmetics and skin care, fragrances and personal care products, and professional products (products for use in and resale by professional salons). On March 30, 2000, the Company sold its worldwide professional products line (See Note 20 for further information). The Company’s principal customers include large mass volume retailers and chain drug stores, as well as certain department stores and other specialty stores, such as perfumeries. The Company also sells consumer and professional products to United States military exchanges and commissaries and has a licensing group. Unless the context otherwise requires, all references to the Company mean Revlon, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Through December 31, 1999, Revlon, Inc. has essentially had no business operations of its own and its only material asset has been all of the outstanding capital stock of Products Corporation. As such, its net (loss) income has historically consisted predominantly of its equity in the net (loss) income of Products Corporation and in 1999, 1998 and 1997 included approximately $1.2, $1.5 and $1.2, respectively, in expenses incidental to being a public holding company. The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries after elimination of all material intercompany balances and transactions. Further, the Company has made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of liabilities and the reporting of revenues and expenses to prepare these financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The Company is an indirect majority owned subsidiary of MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings Inc. (“MacAndrews Holdings”), a corporation wholly owned indirectly through Mafco Holdings Inc. (“Mafco Holdings” and, together with MacAndrews Holdings, “MacAndrews & Forbes”) by Ronald O. Perelman. Certain amounts in the prior year financial statements have been reclassified to conform with the current year’s presentation. Cash and Cash Equivalents: Cash equivalents (primarily investments in time deposits which have original maturities of three months or less) are carried at cost, which approximates fair value. Inventories: Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market value. Cost is principally determined by the first-in, first-out method. Property, Plant and Equipment and Other Assets: Property, plant and equipment is recorded at cost and is depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of such assets as follows: land improvements, 20 to 40 years; buildings and improvements, 5 to 50 years; machinery and equipment, 3 to 17 years; and office furniture and fixtures and capitalized software, 2 to 12 years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over their estimated useful lives or the terms of the leases, whichever is shorter. Repairs and maintenance are charged to operations as incurred, and expenditures for additions and improvements are capitalized. F-7 Included in other assets are permanent displays amounting to approximately $131.2 and $129.0 (net of amortization) as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively, which are amortized over 3 to 5 years. In addition, the Company has included in other assets charges related to the issuance of its debt instruments amounting to approximately $21.0 and $23.6 (net of amortization) as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively, which are amortized over the terms of the related debt instruments. Intangible Assets Related to Businesses Acquired: Intangible assets related to businesses acquired principally represent goodwill, the majority of which is being amortized on a straight-line basis over 40 years. The Company evaluates, when circumstances warrant, the recoverability of its intangible assets on the basis of undiscounted cash flow projections. When impairment is indicated, the Company writes down recorded amounts of goodwill to the amount of estimated undiscounted cash flows. Accumulated amortization aggregated $128.0 and $115.6 at December 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively. Revenue Recognition: The Company recognizes net sales upon shipment of merchandise. Net sales comprise gross revenues less expected returns, trade discounts and customer allowances. Cost of sales is reduced for the estimated net realizable value of expected returns. Income Taxes: Income taxes are calculated using the liability method in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” The Company is included in the affiliated group of which Mafco Holdings is the common parent, and the Company’s federal taxable income and loss will be included in such group’s consolidated tax return filed by Mafco Holdings. The Company also may be included in certain state and local tax returns of Mafco Holdings or its subsidiaries. For all periods presented, federal, state and local income taxes are provided as if the Company filed its own income tax returns. On June 24, 1992, Holdings (as hereinafter defined), the Company and certain of its subsidiaries and Mafco Holdings entered into a tax sharing agreement, which is described in Notes 13 and 16. Pension and Other Postretirement and Postemployment Benefits: The Company sponsors pension and other retirement plans in various forms covering substantially all employees who meet eligibility requirements. For plans in the United States, the minimum amount required pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, as amended, is contributed annually. Various subsidiaries outside the United States have retirement plans under which funds are deposited with trustees or reserves are provided. The Company accounts for benefits such as severance, disability and health insurance provided to former employees prior to their retirement, if estimable, on a terminal basis in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies,” as amended by SFAS No. 112, “Employers’ Accounting for Postemployment Benefits,” which requires companies to accrue for postemployment benefits when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of such liability can be reasonably estimated. Research and Development: Research and development expenditures are expensed as incurred. The amounts charged against earnings in 1999, 1998 and 1997 were $32.9, $31.9 and $29.7, respectively. F-8 Foreign Currency Translation: Assets and liabilities of foreign operations are generally translated into United States dollars at the rates of exchange in effect at the balance sheet date. Income and expense items are generally translated at the weighted average exchange rates prevailing during each period presented. Gains and losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are included in the results of operations. Gains and losses resulting from translation of financial statements of foreign subsidiaries and branches operating in non-hyperinflationary economies are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss. Foreign subsidiaries and branches operating in hyperinflationary economies translate nonmonetary assets and liabilities at historical rates and include translation adjustments in the results of operations. Effective January 1997 and for all of 1997 and 1998, the Company’s operations in Mexico have been accounted for as operating in a hyperinflationary economy. Effective January 1, 1999, the Company’s operations in Mexico have been accounted for as is required for a non-hyperinflationary economy. Effective July 1997, the Company’s operations in Brazil have been accounted for as is required for a non-hyperinflationary economy. The impact of the changes in accounting for Brazil and Mexico was not material to the Company’s operating results in 1997 and in 1999 for Mexico. Sale of Subsidiary Stock: The Company recognizes gains and losses on sales of subsidiary stock in its Consolidated Statements of Operations. Basic and Diluted (Loss) Income per Common Share and Classes of Stock: The basic (loss) income per common share has been computed based upon the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during each of the periods presented. Diluted (loss) income per common share has been computed based upon the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding and when appropriate the dilutive effect of stock options. The Company’s outstanding stock options represent the only potential dilutive common stock outstanding. The amounts of (loss) income used in the calculations of diluted and basic (loss) income per common share were the same in each year presented. The number of shares used in the calculation of diluted (loss) income per common share for 1997 was greater than the number of shares used in the calculation of basic (loss) income per common share for that year by 412,878 shares to give effect to the dilutive effect of outstanding stock options. The number of shares used in the calculation of diluted (loss) income per common share for 1999 and 1998 does not include any incremental shares that would have been outstanding assuming the exercise of stock options because the effect of those incremental shares would have been antidilutive. The Class A Common Stock, par value $.01 per share (the “Class A Common Stock”) and Class B Common Stock, par value $.01 per share (the “Class B Common Stock”) (collectively with the Class A Common Stock, the “Common Stock”) vote as a single class on all matters, except as otherwise required by law, with each share of Class A Common Stock entitling its holder to one vote and each share of the Class B Common Stock entitling its holder to ten votes. All of the shares of the Class B Common Stock are owned by REV Holdings Inc. (“REV Holdings”), an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Mafco Holdings. Mafco Holdings beneficially owns shares of Common Stock having approximately 97.4% of the combined voting power of the outstanding shares of Common Stock. The holders of the Company’s two classes of common stock are entitled to share equally in the earnings of the Company from dividends, when and if declared by the Board. Each outstanding share of Class B Common Stock is convertible into one share of Class A Common Stock. The Company designated 1,000 shares of Preferred Stock as the Series A Preferred Stock, of which 546 shares are outstanding and held by REV Holdings. The holder of Series A Preferred Stock is not entitled to receive any dividends. The Series A Preferred Stock is entitled to a liquidation preference of $100,000 per share before any distribution is made to the holders of Common Stock. The holder of the Series A Preferred Stock does not have any voting rights, except as required by law. The Series A Preferred Stock may be redeemed at any time by the Company, at its option, for $100,000 per share. However, the terms of Products Corporation’s various debt agreements currently restrict Revlon, Inc.’s ability to effect such redemption by generally restricting the amount of dividends or distributions Products Corporation can pay to Revlon, Inc. F-9 Stock-Based Compensation: SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” encourages, but does not require companies to record compensation cost for stock-based employee compensation plans at fair value. The Company has chosen to account for stock-based compensation plans using the intrinsic value method prescribed in Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related interpretation. Accordingly, compensation cost for stock options issued to employees is measured as the excess, if any, of the quoted market price of the Company’s stock at the date of the grant over the amount an employee must pay to acquire the stock (See Note 15). Derivative Financial Instruments: Derivative financial instruments are utilized from time to time by the Company to reduce interest rate and foreign exchange risks. The Company maintains a control environment, which includes policies and procedures for risk assessment and the approval, reporting and monitoring of derivative financial instrument activities. The Company does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading purposes. The differentials to be received or paid under interest rate contracts designated as hedges are recognized in income over the life of the contracts as adjustments to interest expense. Gains and losses on terminations of interest rate contracts designated as hedges are deferred and amortized into interest expense over the remaining life of the original contracts or until repayment of the hedged indebtedness. Unrealized gains and losses on outstanding contracts designated as hedges are not recognized. To qualify for hedge accounting, a contract must meet defined correlation and effectiveness criteria, be designated as a hedge and result in cash flows and financial statement effects that substantially offset those of the position being hedged. Derivative financial instruments that the Company temporarily continues to hold after the early termination of a hedged position, or that otherwise no longer qualify for hedge accounting, are marked-to- market, with gains and losses recognized in the Company’s Statements of Operations after the termination or disqualification. Gains and losses on contracts designated to hedge identifiable foreign currency commitments are deferred and accounted for as part of the related foreign currency transaction. Transaction gains and losses have not been material. In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities," which establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and for hedging activities. In June 1999, the FASB issued SFAS No. 137, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities - Deferral of the Effective Date of SFAS No. 133, an Amendment of SFAS No. 133,” which has delayed the required implementation of SFAS No. 133 such that the Company must adopt this new standard no later than January 1, 2001. The effect of adopting the new standard by the Company has not yet been determined. The Company plans to adopt the new standard on January 1, 2001. Advertising and Promotion: Costs associated with advertising and promotion are expensed in the year incurred. Advertising and promotion expenses were $411.8, $422.9 and $397.4 for 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively. F-10 2. Discontinued Operations During 1998, the Company completed the disposition of its approximately 85% equity interest in The Cosmetic Center, Inc. (the “Cosmetic Center”), along with certain amounts due from Cosmetic Center to the Company for working capital and inventory, to a newly formed limited partnership controlled by an unrelated third party. The Company received a minority limited partnership interest in the limited partnership as consideration for the disposition. Based upon the Company’s expectation that it would receive no future cash flows from the limited partnership, as well as other factors, the Company assigned no value to such interest. As a result, the Company recorded a loss on disposal of $47.7 during 1998. All prior periods were restated to reflect the results of operations of Cosmetic Center as discontinued operations. 3. Extraordinary Items The extraordinary loss of $51.7 in 1998 resulted primarily from the write-off of deferred financing costs and payment of call premiums associated with the redemption of the Senior Notes (as hereinafter defined) and the Senior Subordinated Notes (as hereinafter defined). The extraordinary loss in 1997 resulted from the write-off in the second quarter of 1997 of deferred financing costs associated with the early extinguishment of borrowings under a prior credit agreement and costs of approximately $6.3 in connection with the redemption of Products Corporation’s 10 7/8% Sinking Fund Debentures due 2010 (the “Sinking Fund Debentures”). The early extinguishment of borrowings under a prior credit agreement and the redemption of the Sinking Fund Debentures were financed by the proceeds from a new credit agreement, which became effective in May 1997 (the “Credit Agreement”). 4. Business Consolidation Costs and Other, Net realign and consolidate regional activities, In the fourth quarter of 1998, the Company committed to a restructuring plan to realign and reduce reconfigure certain personnel, exit excess leased real estate, manufacturing operations and exit certain product lines. During 1999, the Company continued to implement such restructuring for which it recorded a charge of $20.5 for employee severance and other personnel benefits, costs associated with the exit from leased facilities as well as other costs. Also in 1999, the Company consummated an exit from a non-core business, resulting in a charge of $1.6, which is included in the table below. Of the 720 and the 493 sales, marketing, administrative, factory and distribution employees worldwide for whom severance and other personnel benefits were included in the charges for the fourth quarter 1998 and during 1999, respectively, the Company had terminated 1,146 employees by December 31, 1999. During the fourth quarter of 1999, the Company continued to re-evaluate its organizational structure and implemented a new restructuring plan principally at its New York headquarters and New Jersey locations resulting in a charge of $18.1 principally for employee severance. As a part of this restructuring plan, the Company reduced personnel and consolidated excess leased real estate. Of the 208 sales, marketing and administrative employees for whom severance and other personnel benefits were included in the charge for the fourth quarter 1999, the Company had terminated 159 of these employees by December 31, 1999. In 1998 the Company recognized a gain of approximately $7.1 for the sale of the wigs and hairpieces portion of its business in the United States and included the amount in business consolidation costs and other, net. The cash and noncash elements of the restructuring charges recorded in 1999 approximate $38.8 and $1.4, respectively and in 1998 approximated $37.2 and $5.7, respectively. In 1997 the Company incurred business consolidation costs of $20.6 in connection with the implementation of its business strategy to rationalize factory operations. These costs primarily included severance for 415 factory and administrative employees and other costs related to the rationalization of certain factory and warehouse operations worldwide. Such costs were partially offset by an approximately $12.7 settlement of a claim and related gains of approximately $4.3 on the sales of certain factory operations outside the United States. As of December 31, 1998 and 1997 the Company had terminated 415 and 200 employees, respectively, relating to the 1997 charge. Details of the charges are as follows: F-11 Balance Beginning of Year Expense (Income) (Utilized) Received Cash Noncash Balance End of Year Employee severance and other 1999 personnel benefits.................................. $ 24.9 Factory, warehouse, office and other costs............................................... 12.1 37.0 $ $ $ 35.3 4.9 40.2 $ $ (35.6) (6.2) (41.8) $ $ - (1.4) (1.4) Employee severance and other 1998 personnel benefits.................................. $ 7.8 $ 26.6 $ (9.5) $ - Factory, warehouse, office and other costs............................................... Sale of assets................................................. Other (expense included in cost of sales)...... 3.2 - - 11.0 $ 1997 Employee severance and other personnel benefits.................................. $ Factory, warehouse, office and other costs............................................... Sale of assets................................................. Settlement of claim........................................ $ - - - - - $ $ $ 14.9 (8.4) 2.7 35.8 $ (2.4) 8.4 - (3.5) $ (3.6) - (2.7) (6.3) 14.2 $ (6.4) $ - $ 7.8 6.4 (4.3) (12.7) 3.6 $ (1.2) 4.3 12.7 9.4 $ (2.0) - - (2.0) $ 3.2 - - 11.0 $ $ $ $ 24.6 9.4 34.0 24.9 12.1 - - 37.0 As of December 31, 1999 and 1998, the unpaid balance of the business consolidation costs are included in accrued expenses and other in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. 5. Acquisitions In 1998 and 1997 the Company consummated acquisitions for a combined purchase price of $62.6 and $51.6 (excluding the acquisition of Cosmetic Center), respectively, with resulting goodwill of $63.7 and $35.8, respectively. These acquisitions were not significant to the Company’s results of operations. There were no acquisitions made by the Company in 1999. F-12 6. Inventories Raw materials and supplies......................................................... Work-in-process.......................................................................... Finished goods............................................................................ 7. Prepaid Expenses and Other Prepaid expenses........................................................................... Other............................................................................................. 8. Property, Plant and Equipment, Net Land and improvements................................................................ Buildings and improvements........................................................ Machinery and equipment............................................................ Office furniture and fixtures and capitalized software.................. Leasehold improvements.............................................................. Construction-in-progress............................................................... Accumulated depreciation............................................................ December 31, 1999 1998 74.1 19.7 184.5 278.3 $ $ 78.2 14.4 171.5 264.1 December 31, 1999 1998 36.7 14.6 51.3 $ $ 42.4 27.5 69.9 December 31, 1999 1998 41.3 174.1 222.9 112.5 28.1 16.0 594.9 (258.5) 336.4 $ $ 33.8 197.3 216.8 88.5 37.2 36.9 610.5 (231.6) 378.9 $ $ $ $ $ $ Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997 was $45.9, $40.5 and $38.4, respectively. 9. Accrued Expenses and Other Advertising and promotional costs and accrual for sales returns.......... Compensation and related benefits........................................................ Interest................................................................................................... Taxes, other than federal income taxes................................................. Restructuring and business consolidation costs..................................... Other...................................................................................................... December 31, 1999 1998 183.5 83.9 38.1 16.6 31.4 56.2 409.7 $ $ 158.3 68.6 39.4 27.5 27.1 68.8 389.7 $ $ F-13 10. Short-term Borrowings Products Corporation maintained uncommitted short-term bank lines of credit, that may be borrowed against at any time at December 31, 1999 and 1998 aggregating approximately $65.6 and $88.3, respectively, of which Interest rates on approximately $37.6 and $27.9 were outstanding at December 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively. amounts borrowed under such short-term lines at December 31, 1999 and 1998 ranged from 3.1% to 6.8% and from 2.9% to 8.6%, respectively, excluding Latin American countries in which the Company had outstanding borrowings of approximately $8.3 and $3.5 at December 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively. Compensating balances at December 31, 1999 and 1998 were approximately $14.2 and $10.3, respectively. Interest rates on compensating balances at December 31, 1999 and 1998 ranged from 4.0% to 4.7% and 1.9% to 5.8%, respectively. 11. Long-term Debt Working capital lines (a)......................................................................... Bank mortgage loan agreement due 2000 (b)......................................... 9 1/2% Senior Notes due 1999 (c).......................................................... 8 1/8 % Senior Notes due 2006 (d)......................................................... 9% Senior Notes due 2006 (e)................................................................ 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2008 (f).................................... Advances from Holdings (g)................................................................... Notes payable due through 2004 ............................................................ Less current portion................................................................................ December 31, 1999 588.2 9.9 - 249.4 250.0 649.8 24.1 0.7 1,772.1 (10.2) 1,761.9 $ $ 1998 272.2 13.6 200.0 249.3 250.0 649.8 24.1 1.0 1,660.0 (6.0) 1,654.0 $ $ (a) In May 1997, Products Corporation entered into the Credit Agreement with a syndicate of lenders, whose individual members change from time to time. The proceeds of loans made under the Credit Agreement were used to repay the loans outstanding under the credit agreement in effect at that time and to redeem the Sinking Fund Debentures. On November 10, 1999, the Credit Agreement was amended as described below. The Credit Agreement provides up to $723.0 at December 31, 1999 and consists of five senior secured facilities: $198.0 in two term loan facilities (the “Term Loan Facilities”), a $300.0 multi-currency facility (the “Multi-Currency Facility”), a $175.0 revolving acquisition facility, which may be increased to $375.0 under certain circumstances with the consent of a majority of the lenders (the “Acquisition Facility”), and a $50.0 special standby letter of credit facility (the “Special LC Facility” and together with the Term Loan Facilities, the Multi-Currency Facility and the Acquisition Facility, the “Credit Facilities”). The Multi-Currency Facility is available (i) to Products Corporation in revolving credit loans denominated in U.S. dollars (the “Revolving Credit Loans”), (ii) to Products Corporation in standby and commercial letters of credit denominated in U.S. dollars (the “Operating Letters of Credit”) and (iii) to Products Corporation and certain of its international subsidiaries designated from time to time in revolving credit loans and bankers’ acceptances denominated in U.S. dollars and other currencies (the “Local Loans”). At December 31, 1999 and 1998, Products Corporation had approximately $198.0 and $199.0, respectively, outstanding under the Term Loan Facilities, $235.2 and $9.7, respectively, outstanding under the Multi- Currency Facility, $155.0 and $63.5, respectively, outstanding under the Acquisition Facility and $29.8 and $29.0, respectively, of issued but undrawn letters of credit under the Special LC Facility. The Credit Facilities (other than loans in foreign currencies) bear interest as of December 31, 1999 at a rate equal to, at Products Corporation’s option, either (A) the Alternate Base Rate plus 2.50% (or 3.50% for Local Loans); or (B) the Eurodollar Rate plus 3.50%. Loans in foreign currencies bear interest as of December 31, 1999 at a rate equal to the Eurocurrency Rate or, in the case of Local Loans, the local lender rate, in each case plus 3.50%. The applicable margin is reduced in the event Products Corporation attains certain leverage ratios. Products Corporation pays the lender a commitment fee as of December 31, 1999 of 1/2 of 1% of the unused portion of the Credit Facilities. Under the Multi- Currency Facility, the Company pays the lenders an administrative fee of 1/4% per annum on the aggregate principal F-14 amount of specified Local Loans. Products Corporation also paid certain facility and other fees to the lenders and agents upon closing of the Credit Agreement. Prior to its termination date, the commitments under the Credit Facilities will be reduced by: (i) the net proceeds in excess of $10.0 each year received during such year from sales of assets by Holdings (or certain of its subsidiaries), Products Corporation or any of its subsidiaries (and $25.0 in the aggregate during the term with respect to certain specified dispositions), subject to certain limited exceptions, (ii) certain proceeds from the sales of collateral security granted to the lenders, (iii) the net proceeds from the issuance by Products Corporation or any of its subsidiaries of certain additional debt, (iv) 50% of the excess cash flow of Products Corporation and its subsidiaries (unless certain leverage ratios are attained) and (v) certain scheduled reductions in the case of the Term Loan Facilities, which commenced on May 31, 1998 in the aggregate amount of $1.0 annually over the remaining life of the Credit Agreement, and in the case of the Acquisition Facility, which commenced on December 31, 1999 in the amount of $25.0 and, as of December 31, 1999, in the amounts of $60.0 during 2000, $90.0 during 2001 and $25.0 during 2002 (which reductions will be proportionately increased if the Acquisition Facility is increased). As described below, as a result of the reduction in commitment resulting from the sale of the Company’s worldwide professional products line, the originally scheduled reductions in 2000 and 2001 have decreased. The Credit Agreement will terminate on May 30, 2002. The weighted average interest rates on the Term Loan Facilities, the Multi-Currency Facility and the Acquisition Facility were 9.9%, 8.1% and 9.8% at December 31, 1999, respectively, and 8.1%, 9.2% and 8.7% at December 31, 1998, respectively. The Credit Facilities, subject to certain exceptions and limitations, are supported by guarantees from Holdings and certain of its subsidiaries, Revlon, Inc., Products Corporation and the domestic subsidiaries of Products Corporation. The obligations of Products Corporation under the Credit Facilities and the obligations under the aforementioned guarantees are secured, subject to certain limitations, by (i) a mortgage on Products Corporation’s Phoenix, Arizona facility; (ii) the capital stock of Products Corporation and its domestic subsidiaries, 66% of the capital stock of its first tier foreign subsidiaries and the capital stock of certain subsidiaries of Holdings; (iii) domestic intellectual property and certain other domestic intangibles of (x) Products Corporation and its domestic subsidiaries and (y) certain subsidiaries of Holdings; (iv) domestic inventory and accounts receivable of (x) Products Corporation and its domestic subsidiaries and (y) certain subsidiaries of Holdings; and (v) the assets of certain foreign subsidiary borrowers under the Multi- Currency Facility (to support their borrowings only). The Credit Agreement provides that the liens on the stock and personal property referred to above may be shared from time to time with specified types of other obligations incurred or guaranteed by Products Corporation, such as interest rate hedging obligations, working capital lines and a subsidiary of Products Corporation’s yen-denominated credit agreement. The Credit Agreement contains various material restrictive covenants prohibiting Products Corporation from (i) incurring additional indebtedness or guarantees, with certain exceptions, (ii) making dividend, tax sharing and other payments or loans to Revlon, Inc. or other affiliates, with certain exceptions, including among others, permitting Products Corporation to pay dividends and make distributions to Revlon, Inc., among other things, to enable Revlon, Inc. to pay expenses incidental to being a public holding company, including, among other things, professional fees such as legal and accounting, regulatory fees such as Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) filing fees and other miscellaneous expenses related to being a public holding company, and to pay dividends or make distributions in certain circumstances to finance the purchase by Revlon, Inc. of its common stock in connection with the delivery of such common stock to grantees under any stock option plan, provided that the aggregate amount of such dividends and distributions taken together with any purchases of Revlon, Inc. common stock on the market to satisfy matching obligations under an excess savings plan may not exceed $6.0 per annum, (iii) creating liens or other encumbrances on their assets or revenues, granting negative pledges or selling or transferring any of their assets except in the ordinary course of business, all subject to certain limited exceptions, (iv) with certain exceptions, engaging in merger or acquisition transactions, (v) prepaying indebtedness, subject to certain limited exceptions, (vi) making investments, subject to certain limited exceptions, and as described below and (vii) entering into transactions with affiliates of Products Corporation other than upon terms no less favorable to Products Corporation or its subsidiaries than it would obtain in an arms’-length transaction. In addition to the foregoing, the Credit Agreement contains financial covenants requiring Products Corporation to maintain minimum interest coverage in 2001 and 2002, covenants that limit the leverage ratio of Products Corporation in 2001 and 2002, and covenants that limit the amount of capital expenditures. The events of default under the Credit Agreement include a Change of Control (as defined in the Credit Agreement) of Products Corporation, the acceleration of, or certain payment defaults under, indebtedness of REV F-15 Holdings in excess of $0.5 (which was eliminated by amendment in March 2000), and other customary events of default for such types of agreements. the "Asset Sales"); (v) change the reduction of the aggregate commitment The Credit Agreement contained financial covenants requiring Products Corporation to maintain minimum interest coverage and to limit its leverage ratio, among other things. As a result of the loss from continuing operations before taxes incurred by Products Corporation in the third quarter of 1999, the interest coverage and leverage ratios specified in the Credit Agreement were not achieved at September 30, 1999. On November 10, 1999 the Credit Agreement was amended to (i) eliminate the interest coverage ratio and leverage ratio covenants from the quarter ended September 30, 1999 through the year 2000 and to modify those covenants for the years 2001 and 2002; (ii) add a minimum EBITDA covenant for each quarter end during the year 2000; (iii) limit the amount that Products Corporation may spend for capital expenditures and investments including acquisitions; (iv) permit the sale of Products Corporation's worldwide professional products line and its non-core Latin American brands Colorama, Juvena, Bozzano and Plusbelle (such sales, is required upon consummation of any Asset Sale to an amount equal to 60% of the Net Proceeds (as defined in the Credit Agreement) from such Asset Sale as opposed to 100% of such Net Proceeds as provided under the Credit Agreement prior to the amendment; (vi) increase the “applicable margin” by ¾ of 1% and (vii) permit the amendment of a yen-denominated credit agreement (the “Yen Credit Agreement”). On March 30, 2000, approximately 60% of the $250.5 in Net Proceeds (as that term is defined in the Credit Agreement) from the sale of its worldwide professional products line was used to permanently reduce the aggregate commitment under the Credit Agreement to $572.7. As a result of such commitment reduction, as of March 30, 2000, the aggregate amount outstanding under the Term Loan Facilities was reduced by $79.8 to $118.2, and the aggregate commitments under the Acquisition Facility was reduced by $70.5 to $104.5. The scheduled reductions of the Acquisition Facility will also be reduced such that the total amount of such reductions is equal to the reduced aggregate Acquisition Facility commitment. The scheduled reductions of the Acquisition Facility changed from $60.0 to $35.8 during 2000, from $90.0 to $53.8 during 2001 and from $25.0 to $14.9 during 2002. that (b) The Pacific Finance & Development Corp., a wholly owned subsidiary of Products Corporation, is the borrower under the Yen Credit Agreement, which had a principal balance of approximately ¥1.0 billion as of December 31, 1999 (approximately $9.9 U.S. dollar equivalent as of December 31, 1999) after giving effect to the payment of approximately ¥539 million (approximately $4.6 U.S. dollar equivalent) in March 1999. On November 12, 1999, the borrower under the Yen Credit Agreement executed an amendment to the Yen Credit Agreement to eliminate the amortization payment due in March 2000 and to provide that the final maturity date of the Yen Credit Agreement will be the earlier of (i) the closing date of the sale of Products Corporation's professional products line and (ii) December 31, 2000. The applicable interest rate at December 31, 1999 under the Yen Credit Agreement was the Euro-Yen rate plus 2.75%, which approximated 3.6%. The interest rate at December 31, 1998 was the Euro-Yen rate plus 2.75%, which approximated 3.5%. In March 2000, the outstanding balance under the Yen Credit Agreement was repaid in accordance with its terms. (c) During 1999 Products Corporation redeemed the 9 1/2% Senior Notes due 1999 (the “1999 Notes”) with proceeds from the sale of the 9% Senior Notes due 2006 (the “9% Notes”). (d) The 8 1/8 % Notes due 2006 (the “8 1/8% Notes”) are senior unsecured obligations of Products Corporation and rank pari passu in right of payment with all existing and future Senior Debt (as defined in the indenture relating to the 8 1/8% Notes (the “8 1/8% Notes Indenture”)) of Products Corporation, including the 1999 the 9% Notes and the indebtedness under the Credit Notes until the maturity or earlier retirement thereof, Agreement, and are senior to the 8 5/8% Notes and to all future subordinated indebtedness of Products Corporation. The 8 1/8% Notes are effectively subordinated to the outstanding indebtedness and other liabilities of Products Corporation’s subsidiaries. Interest is payable on February 1 and August 1. The 8 1/8% Notes may be redeemed at the option of Products Corporation in whole or from time to time in part at any time on or after February 1, 2002 at the redemption prices set forth in the 8 1/8% Notes Indenture plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of redemption. In addition, at any time prior to February 1, 2001, Products Corporation may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the 8 1/8% Notes originally issued at a redemption price of 108 1/8% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, thereon to the date fixed for redemption, with, and to the extent Products Corporation receives, the net cash proceeds of one or more Public Equity Offerings (as defined in the 8 1/8% Notes Indenture), provided that at least $162.5 F-16 aggregate principal amount of the 8 1/8% Notes remains outstanding immediately after the occurrence of each such redemption. Upon a Change of Control (as defined in the 8 1/8% Notes Indenture), Products Corporation will have the option to redeem the 8 1/8% Notes in whole at a redemption price equal to the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, thereon to the date of redemption plus the Applicable Premium (as defined in the 8 1/8% Notes Indenture) and, subject to certain conditions, each holder of the 8 1/8% Notes will have the right to require Products Corporation to repurchase all or a portion of such holder’s 8 1/8% Notes at a price equal to 101% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, thereon to the date of repurchase. The 8 1/8% Notes Indenture contains covenants that, among other things, limit (i) the issuance of additional debt and redeemable stock by Products Corporation, (ii) the incurrence of liens, (iii) the issuance of debt and preferred stock by Products Corporation’s subsidiaries, (iv) the payment of dividends on capital stock of Products Corporation and its subsidiaries and the redemption of capital stock of Products Corporation and certain subordinated obligations, (v) the sale of assets and subsidiary stock, (vi) transactions with affiliates and (vii) consolidations, mergers and transfers of all or substantially all Products Corporation’s assets. The 8 1/8% Notes Indenture also prohibits certain restrictions on distributions from subsidiaries. All of these limitations and prohibitions, however, are subject to a number of important qualifications. (e) The 9% Notes are senior unsecured obligations of Products Corporation and rank pari passu in right of payment with all existing and future Senior Debt (as defined in the indenture relating to the 9% Notes (the “9% Notes Indenture”)) of Products Corporation, including the 1999 Notes until the maturity or earlier retirement thereof, the 8 1/8% Notes and the indebtedness under the Credit Agreement, and are senior to the 8 5/8% Notes and to all future subordinated indebtedness of Products Corporation. The 9% Notes are effectively subordinated to outstanding indebtedness and other liabilities of Products Corporation’s subsidiaries. Interest is payable on May 1 and November 1. The 9% Notes may be redeemed at the option of Products Corporation in whole or from time to time in part at any time on or after November 1, 2002 at the redemption prices set forth in the 9% Notes Indenture plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of redemption. In addition, at any time prior to November 1, 2001, Products Corporation may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the 9% Notes originally issued at a redemption price of 109% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, thereon to the date fixed for redemption, with, and to the extent Products Corporation receives, the net cash proceeds of one or more Public Equity Offerings (as defined in the 9% Notes Indenture), provided that at least $162.5 aggregate principal amount of the 9% Notes remains outstanding immediately after the occurrence of each such redemption. Upon a Change in Control (as defined in the 9% Notes Indenture), Products Corporation will have the option to redeem the 9% Notes in whole at a redemption price equal to the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, thereon to the date of redemption plus the Applicable Premium (as defined in the 9% Notes Indenture) and, subject to certain conditions, each holder of the 9% Notes will have the right to require Products Corporation to repurchase all or a portion of such holder’s 9% Notes at a price equal to 101% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, thereon to the date of repurchase. The 9% Notes Indenture contains covenants that, among other things, limit (i) the issuance of additional debt and redeemable stock by Products Corporation, (ii) the incurrence of liens, (iii) the issuance of debt and preferred stock by Products Corporation’s subsidiaries, (iv) the payment of dividends on capital stock of Products Corporation and its subsidiaries and the redemption of capital stock of Products Corporation and certain subordinated obligations, (v) the sale of assets and subsidiary stock, (vi) transactions with affiliates and (vii) consolidations, mergers and transfers of all or substantially all Products Corporation’s assets. The 9% Notes Indenture also prohibits certain restrictions on distributions from subsidiaries. All of these limitations and prohibitions, however, are subject to a number of important qualifications. (f) The 8 5/8% Notes due 2008 (the “8 5/8% Notes”) are general unsecured obligations of Products Corporation and are (i) subordinate in right of payment to all existing and future Senior Debt (as defined in the indenture relating to the 8 5/8% Notes (the “8 5/8% Notes Indenture”)) of Products Corporation, including the 1999 Notes until the maturity or earlier retirement thereof, the 9% Notes, the 8 1/8% Notes and the indebtedness under the F-17 Credit Agreement, (ii) pari passu in right of payment with all future senior subordinated debt, if any, of Products Corporation and (iii) senior in right of payment to all future subordinated debt, if any, of Products Corporation. The 8 5/8% Notes are effectively subordinated to the outstanding indebtedness and other liabilities of Products Corporation’s subsidiaries. Interest is payable on February 1 and August 1. The 8 5/8% Notes may be redeemed at the option of Products Corporation in whole or from time to time in part at any time on or after February 1, 2003 at the redemption prices set forth in the 8 5/8% Notes Indenture plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of redemption. In addition, at any time prior to February 1, 2001, Products Corporation may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the 8 5/8% Notes originally issued at a redemption price of 108 5/8% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, thereon to the date fixed for redemption, with, and to the extent Products Corporation receives, the net cash proceeds of one or more Public Equity Offerings (as defined in the 8 5/8% Notes Indenture), provided that at least $422.5 aggregate principal amount of the 8 5/8% Notes remains outstanding immediately after the occurrence of each such redemption. Upon a Change of Control (as defined in the 8 5/8% Notes Indenture), Products Corporation will have the option to redeem the 8 5/8% Notes in whole at a redemption price equal to the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, thereon to the date of redemption plus the Applicable Premium (as defined in the 8 5/8% Notes Indenture) and, subject to certain conditions, each holder of the 8 5/8% Notes will have the right to require Products Corporation to repurchase all or a portion of such holder’s 8 5/8% Notes at a price equal to 101% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, thereon to the date of repurchase. The 8 5/8% Notes Indenture contains covenants that, among other things, limit (i) the issuance of additional debt and redeemable stock by Products Corporation, (ii) the incurrence of liens, (iii) the issuance of debt and preferred stock by Products Corporation’s subsidiaries, (iv) the payment of dividends on capital stock of Products Corporation and its subsidiaries and the redemption of capital stock of Products Corporation, (v) the sale of assets and subsidiary stock, (vi) transactions with affiliates, (vii) consolidations, mergers and transfers of all or substantially all of Products Corporation’s assets and (viii) the issuance of additional subordinated debt that is senior in right of payment to the 8 5/8% Notes. The 8 5/8% Notes Indenture also prohibits certain restrictions on distributions from subsidiaries. All of these limitations and prohibitions, however, are subject to a number of important qualifications. The 1999 Notes Indenture, the 8 1/8% Notes Indenture, the 8 5/8% Notes Indenture and the 9% Notes Indenture contain customary events of default for debt instruments of such type. (g) During 1992, Revlon Holdings Inc., the indirect parent of the Company (“Holdings”), made an advance of $25.0 to Products Corporation, evidenced by subordinated noninterest-bearing demand notes. The notes were subsequently adjusted by offsets and additional amounts loaned by Holdings to Products Corporation. In June 1997, Products Corporation borrowed from Holdings approximately $0.5, representing certain amounts received by Holdings from the sale of a brand and the inventory relating thereto. In 1998, approximately $6.8 due to Products Corporation from Holdings was offset against the notes payable to Holdings. At December 31, 1999 the balance of $24.1 is evidenced by noninterest-bearing promissory notes payable to Holdings that are subordinated to Products Corporation’s obligations under the Credit Agreement. (h) Products Corporation borrows funds from its affiliates from time to time to supplement its working capital borrowings. No such borrowings were outstanding as of December 31, 1999 or 1998. The interest rates for such borrowings are more favorable to Products Corporation than interest rates under the Credit Agreement and, for borrowings occurring prior to the execution of the Credit Agreement, the credit facilities in effect at the time of such borrowing. The amount of interest paid by Products Corporation for such borrowings for 1999, 1998 and 1997 was $0.5, $0.8 and $0.6, respectively. The aggregate amounts of long-term debt maturities (at December 31, 1999), in the years 2000 through 2004 are $10.2, $67.5, $545.1, $0 and $0.1, respectively, and $1,149.2 thereafter. The Company expects that cash flows from operations and funds from currently available credit facilities and renewals of short-term borrowings will be sufficient to enable the Company to meet its anticipated cash requirements during 2000 on a consolidated basis, including for debt service. However, there can be no assurance that the F-18 combination of cash flow from operations, funds from existing credit facilities and renewals of short-term borrowings will be sufficient to meet the Company's cash requirements on a consolidated basis. If the Company is unable to satisfy such cash requirements, the Company could be required to adopt one or more alternatives, such as reducing or delaying capital expenditures, restructuring indebtedness, selling other assets or operations, or seeking capital contributions or loans from affiliates of the Company or issuing additional shares of capital stock of Revlon, Inc. Products Corporation has had discussions with an affiliate that is prepared to provide financial support to Products Corporation of up to $40 on appropriate terms through December 31, 2000. 12. Financial Instruments As of December 31, 1997, Products Corporation was party to a series of interest rate swap agreements totaling a notional amount of $225.0 in which Products Corporation agreed to pay on such notional amount a variable interest rate equal to the six month LIBOR to its counterparties and the counterparties agreed to pay on such notional amounts fixed interest rates averaging approximately 6.03% per annum. Products Corporation entered into these agreements in 1993 and 1994 (and in the first quarter of 1996 extended a portion equal to a notional amount of $125.0 through December 2001) to convert the interest rate on $225.0 of fixed-rate indebtedness to a variable rate. Products Corporation terminated these agreements in January 1998 and realized a gain of approximately $1.6, which was recognized upon repayment of the hedged indebtedness and is included in the extraordinary item for the early extinguishment of debt. Certain other swap agreements were terminated in 1993 for a gain of $14.0 that was amortized over the original lives of the agreements through 1997. The amortization of the 1993 realized gain in 1997 was approximately $3.1. Products Corporation enters into forward foreign exchange contracts and option contracts from time to time to hedge certain cash flows denominated in foreign currencies. At December 31, 1998, Products Corporation had outstanding forward foreign exchange contracts denominated in various currencies of approximately $197.5 and outstanding option contracts of approximately $51.0. Such contracts are entered into to hedge transactions predominantly occurring within twelve months. If Products Corporation had terminated these contracts on December 31, 1998 or the contracts then outstanding on December 31, 1997, no material gain or loss would have been realized. There were no forward foreign exchange or option contracts outstanding on December 31, 1999. The fair value of the Company’s long-term debt is estimated based on the quoted market prices for the same issues or on the current rates offered to the Company for debt of the same remaining maturities. The estimated fair value of long-term debt at December 31, 1999 and 1998 was approximately $444.2 and $63.1 less than the carrying values of $1,772.1 and $1,660.0, respectively. Because considerable judgment is required in interpreting market data to develop estimates of fair value, the estimates are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that could be realized or would be paid in a current market exchange. The effect of using different market assumptions or estimation methodologies may be material to the estimated fair value amounts. Products Corporation also maintains standby and trade letters of credit with certain banks for various corporate purposes under which Products Corporation is obligated, of which approximately $30.5 and $30.7 (including amounts available under credit agreements in effect at that time) were maintained at December 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively. Included in these amounts are $25.7 and $26.9, respectively, in standby letters of credit, which support Products Corporation’s self-insurance programs. The estimated liability under such programs is accrued by Products Corporation. The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, trade receivables, accounts payable and short-term borrowings approximate their fair values. F-19 13. Income Taxes In June 1992, Holdings, Revlon, Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries, and Mafco Holdings entered into a tax sharing agreement (as subsequently amended, the “Tax Sharing Agreement”), pursuant to which Mafco Holdings has agreed to indemnify Revlon, Inc. against federal, state or local income tax liabilities of the consolidated or combined group of which Mafco Holdings (or a subsidiary of Mafco Holdings other than Revlon, Inc. or its subsidiaries) is the common parent for taxable periods beginning on or after January 1, 1992 during which Revlon, Inc. or a subsidiary of Revlon, Inc. is a member of such group. Pursuant to the Tax Sharing Agreement, for all taxable periods beginning on or after January 1, 1992, Revlon, Inc. will pay to Holdings amounts equal to the taxes that Revlon, Inc. would otherwise have to pay if it were to file separate federal, state or local income tax returns (including any amounts determined to be due as a result of a redetermination arising from an audit or otherwise of the consolidated or combined tax liability relating to any such period which is attributable to Revlon, Inc.), except that Revlon, Inc. will not be entitled to carry back any losses to taxable periods ended prior to January 1, 1992. No payments are required by Revlon, Inc. if and to the extent that Products Corporation is prohibited under the Credit Agreement from making tax sharing payments to Revlon, Inc. The Credit Agreement prohibits Products Corporation from making any tax sharing payments other than in respect of state and local income taxes. Since the payments to be made by Revlon, Inc. under the Tax Sharing Agreement will be determined by the amount of taxes that Revlon, Inc. would otherwise have to pay if it were to file separate federal, state or local income tax returns, the Tax Sharing Agreement will benefit Mafco Holdings to the extent Mafco Holdings can offset the taxable income generated by Revlon, Inc. against losses and tax credits generated by Mafco Holdings and its other subsidiaries. As a result of net operating tax losses and prohibitions under the Credit Agreement there were no federal tax payments or payments in lieu of taxes pursuant to the Tax Sharing Agreement for 1999, 1998 or 1997. The Company has a liability of $0.9 to Holdings in respect of federal taxes for 1997 under the Tax Sharing Agreement. Pursuant to the asset transfer agreement referred to in Note 16, Products Corporation assumed all tax liabilities of Holdings other than (i) certain income tax liabilities arising prior to January 1, 1992 to the extent such liabilities exceeded reserves on Holdings’ books as of January 1, 1992 or were not of the nature reserved for and (ii) other tax liabilities to the extent such liabilities are related to the business and assets retained by Holdings. The Company’s (loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes and the applicable provision (benefit) for income taxes are as follows: Year Ended December 31, 1998 1999 (289.7) (72.7) (362.4) - 0.4 8.7 9.1 14.7 3.3 (8.8) - (0.1) 9.1 $ $ $ $ $ $ 15.3 (37.6) (22.3) - 0.6 4.4 5.0 12.1 (0.3) (7.7) 0.5 0.4 5.0 $ $ $ $ $ $ 1997 82.6 (15.5) 67.1 0.9 1.1 7.3 9.3 31.9 10.4 (34.1) 1.1 - 9.3 (Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes: Domestic............................................................................. Foreign................................................................................ Provision (benefit) for income taxes: Federal................................................................................ State and local..................................................................... Foreign................................................................................ Current................................................................................ Deferred.............................................................................. Benefits of operating loss carryforwards............................ Carryforward utilization applied to goodwill..................... Effect of enacted change of tax rates.................................. $ $ $ $ $ $ F-20 The effective tax rate on (loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes is reconciled to the applicable statutory federal income tax rate as follows: Statutory federal income tax rate............................................... State and local taxes, net of federal income tax benefit............. Foreign and U.S. tax effects attributable to operations outside the U.S.................................................. Tax write-off of U.S. investment in foreign subsidiary............. Nondeductible amortization expense......................................... Change in domestic valuation allowance.................................. Other.......................................................................................... Effective rate............................................................................. Year Ended December 31, 1998 1997 1999 (35.0) % 0.1 10.5 - 0.8 27.3 (1.2) 2.5 % (35.0) % 1.7 75.1 (232.9) 13.5 200.3 (0.3) 22.4 % 35.0 % 1.1 13.4 - 4.5 (43.5) 3.4 13.9 % The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities at December 31, 1999 and 1998 are presented below: Deferred tax assets: Accounts receivable, principally due to doubtful accounts.................................$ Inventories........................................................................................................... Net operating loss carryforwards - domestic....................................................... Net operating loss carryforwards - foreign.......................................................... Accruals and related reserves.............................................................................. Employee benefits............................................................................................... State and local taxes............................................................................................ Self-insurance...................................................................................................... Advertising, sales discounts and returns and coupon redemptions..................... Other.................................................................................................................... Total gross deferred tax assets..................................................................... Less valuation allowance............................................................................. Net deferred tax assets................................................................................. Deferred tax liabilities: Plant, equipment and other assets....................................................................... Other.................................................................................................................... Total gross deferred tax liabilities................................................................ December 31, 1999 1998 $ 5.0 16.8 221.9 122.2 16.1 43.0 12.7 1.8 36.4 29.3 505.2 (443.8) 61.4 (51.8) (4.5) (56.3) 4.2 12.1 190.3 111.0 22.6 32.5 13.1 2.2 30.5 27.5 446.0 (383.0) 63.0 (58.4) (8.2) (66.6) (3.6) Net deferred tax asset (liability)...................................................................$ 5.1 $ In assessing the reliability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. Based upon the level of historical taxable income for certain international markets and projections for future taxable income over the periods in which the deferred tax assets are deductible, management believes it is more likely than not that the Company will realize the benefits of certain deductible differences existing at December 31, 1999. The valuation allowance increased by $60.8 and $102.9 during 1999 and 1998, respectively and decreased by $54.0 during 1997. During 1999, 1998, and 1997, certain of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries used operating loss carryforwards to credit the current provision for income taxes by $8.8, $2.4, and $4.0, respectively. Certain other foreign operations F-21 generated losses during 1999, 1998 and 1997 for which the potential tax benefit was reduced by a valuation allowance. During 1998 and 1997, the Company used domestic operating loss carryforwards to credit the deferred provision for income taxes by $5.3 and $12.0, respectively. During 1997, the Company applied domestic operating loss carryforwards to credit the current provision for income taxes by $18.1. At December 31, 1999, the Company had tax loss carryforwards of approximately $975.1 that expire in future years as follows: 2000-$9.2; 2001-$19.9; 2002-$40.0; 2003-$22.1; 2004 and beyond-$699.5; unlimited-$184.4. The Company could receive the benefit of such tax loss carryforwards only to the extent it has taxable income during the carryforward periods in the applicable jurisdictions. In addition, based upon certain factors, including the amount and nature of gains or losses recognized by Mafco Holdings and its other subsidiaries included in the consolidated federal income tax return, the amount of net operating loss carryforwards attributable to Mafco Holdings and such other subsidiaries and the amounts of alternative minimum tax liability of Mafco Holdings and such other subsidiaries, pursuant to the terms of the Tax Sharing Agreement, all or a portion of the domestic operating loss carryforwards may not be available to the Company should the Company cease being a member of the Mafco Holdings consolidated federal income tax return. Appropriate United States and foreign income taxes have been accrued on foreign earnings that have been or are expected to be remitted in the near future. Unremitted earnings of foreign subsidiaries which have been, or are currently intended to be, permanently reinvested in the future growth of the business aggregated approximately $13.3 at December 31, 1999, excluding those amounts which, if remitted in the near future, would not result in significant additional taxes under tax statutes currently in effect. 14. Postretirement Benefits Pension: A substantial portion of the Company’s employees in the United States are covered by defined benefit pension plans. The Company uses September 30 as its measurement date for plan obligations and assets. Other Postretirement Benefits: The Company also has sponsored an unfunded retiree benefit plan, which provides death benefits payable to beneficiaries of certain key employees and former employees. Participation in this plan is limited to participants enrolled as of December 31, 1993. The Company also administers a medical insurance plan on behalf of Holdings, the cost of which has been apportioned to Holdings. The Company uses September 30 as its measurement date for plan obligations. F-22 Information regarding the Company’s significant pension and other postretirement plans at the dates indicated is as follows: Pension Plans Other Postretirement Benefits December 31, Change in Benefit Obligation: Benefit obligation - September 30 of prior year.................... $ Service cost........................................................................... Interest cost........................................................................... Plan amendments................................................................... Actuarial (loss) gain.............................................................. Curtailments.......................................................................... Benefits paid.......................................................................... Foreign exchange.................................................................. Plan participant contributions................................................ Benefit obligation - September 30 of current year................ Change in Plan Assets: Fair value of plan assets - September 30 of prior year.......... Actual return (loss) on plan assets......................................... Employer contributions......................................................... Plan participant contributions................................................ Benefits paid.......................................................................... Foreign exchange.................................................................. Fair value of plan assets - September 30 of current year...... Funded status of plans................................................................. Amounts contributed to plans during fourth quarter................... Unrecognized net loss (gain)...................................................... Unrecognized prior service cost.................................................. Unrecognized net (asset) obligation............................................ Accrued benefit cost.............................................................. $ Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets consist of: Prepaid expenses................................................................... $ Other long-term liabilities..................................................... Intangible asset...................................................................... Accumulated other comprehensive loss................................ Due from affiliate.................................................................. $ 1999 (438.6) $ (16.0) (28.7) - 46.8 - 19.1 - (0.8) (418.2) 286.0 52.1 4.5 0.8 (19.1) (0.6) 323.7 (94.5) 1.2 19.0 5.5 (0.7) (69.5) $ 1998 (364.8) $ (12.8) (27.0) 0.2 (51.6) 0.6 17.6 (0.1) (0.7) (438.6) 306.9 (6.5) 3.5 0.7 (17.6) (1.0) 286.0 (152.6) 1.0 96.6 7.3 (0.9) (48.6) $ $ 6.3 (81.4) - 4.9 0.7 (69.5) $ $ 8.7 (98.6) 7.8 32.5 1.0 (48.6) $ The following weighted-average assumptions were used in accounting for the plans: 1999 1998 (9.3) $ (0.1) (0.7) - 0.3 - 0.6 - - (9.2) - - 0.6 - (0.6) - - (9.2) 0.1 (1.6) - - (10.7) $ $ - (10.7) - - 1.6 (9.1) $ (8.7) (0.1) (0.7) - (0.3) - 0.5 - - (9.3) - - 0.5 - (0.5) - - (9.3) 0.1 (1.4) - - (10.6) - (10.6) - - 1.7 (8.9) International Plans 1998 6.2% 9.6 4.9 1999 6.5% 9.2 4.5 1997 7.1% 10.1 5.3 Discount rate................................................ 7.50% 9.5 Expected return on plan assets..................... 5.3 Rate of future compensation increases........ 1999 U.S. Plans 1998 6.75% 9.0 5.3 1997 7.75% 9.0 5.3 F-23 The components of net periodic benefit cost for the plans are as follows: Service cost............................................... $ Interest cost............................................... Expected return on plan assets.................. Amortization of prior service cost............ Amortization of net transition asset.......... Amortization of actuarial loss (gain)........ Settlement loss.......................................... Curtailment loss........................................ Portion allocated to Holdings................... $ Pension Plans Other Postretirement Benefits Year Ended December 31, 1999 16.0 28.7 (26.6) 1.7 (0.2) 5.0 - - 24.6 (0.3) 24.3 $ $ 1998 12.8 27.0 (27.4) 1.8 (0.2) 1.0 - 0.3 15.3 (0.3) 15.0 $ $ 1997 11.7 26.0 (23.0) 1.8 (0.2) 1.2 0.2 0.1 17.8 (0.3) 17.5 $ $ 1999 0.1 0.7 - - - (0.3) - - 0.5 0.1 0.6 $ $ 1998 0.1 0.7 - - - (0.3) - - 0.5 0.1 0.6 $ $ 1997 0.1 0.7 - - - (0.2) - - 0.6 0.1 0.7 Where the accumulated benefit obligation exceeded the related fair value of plan assets, the projected benefit obligation, accumulated benefit obligation, and fair value of plan assets for the Company’s pension plans are as follows: Projected benefit obligation................................................................................. $ Accumulated benefit obligation........................................................................... Fair value of plan assets....................................................................................... 1999 61.2 53.0 0.7 December 31, 1998 428.2 370.5 276.3 $ $ 1997 55.5 45.2 1.9 15. Stock Compensation Plan Since March 5, 1996, Revlon, Inc. has had a stock-based compensation plan as amended and restated as of February 12, 1999 (the “Plan”), which is described below. Revlon, Inc. applies APB Opinion No. 25 and its related interpretations in accounting for the Plan. Under APB Opinion No. 25, because the exercise price of Revlon, Inc.’s employee stock options equals the market price of the underlying stock on the date of grant, no compensation cost has been recognized. Had compensation cost for the Plan been determined consistent with SFAS No. 123, Revlon, Inc.’s net (loss) income and net (loss) income per diluted share of $(371.5) and $(7.25), respectively, for 1999, $(143.2) and $(2.80), respectively, for 1998, and $43.6 and $0.85, respectively, for 1997 would have been changed to the pro forma amounts of $(397.2) and $(7.75) for 1999, respectively, $(166.8) and $(3.25) for 1998, respectively, and $31.3 and $0.61, respectively, for 1997. The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of the grant using the Black- Scholes option-pricing model assuming no dividend yield, expected volatility of approximately 68% in 1999, 56% in 1998, and 39% in 1997; weighted average risk-free interest rate of 5.48% in 1999, 5.37% in 1998, and 6.54% in 1997; and a seven year expected average life for the Plan’s options issued in 1999, 1998 and 1997. The effects of applying SFAS No. 123 in this pro forma disclosure are not necessarily indicative of future amounts. Under the Plan, Revlon, Inc. may grant options to its employees for up to an aggregate of 7.0 million shares of Class A Common Stock. Non-qualified options granted under the Plan have a term of 10 years during which the holder can purchase shares of Class A Common Stock at an exercise price which must be not less than the market price on the date of the grant. Option grants vest over service periods that range from one to five years, except as disclosed below. Options granted in February 1999 with an original four year vesting term were modified in May 1999 to allow the options to become fully vested on the first anniversary date of the grant. During each of 1999, 1998 and 1997, the Company granted to Mr. Perelman, Chairman of the Board, options to purchase 300,000 shares of Class A Common Stock, which grants will vest in full on the fifth anniversary of the grant dates as to the 1998 and F-24 1997 grants and which vested 100% on the date of grant as to the 1999 grant. At December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997 there were 1,850,050, 403,950 and 98,450 options exercisable under the Plan, respectively. A summary of the status of the Plan as of December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997 and changes during the years then ended is presented below: Outstanding at December 31, 1996...... Granted................................................. Exercised.............................................. Forfeited............................................... Outstanding at December 31, 1997...... Granted................................................. Exercised.............................................. Forfeited............................................... Outstanding at December 31, 1998...... Granted................................................. Exercised.............................................. Forfeited............................................... Outstanding at December 31, 1999...... Shares (000) 891.1 Weighted Average Exercise Price $24.37 1,485.5 (12.1) (85.1) 2,279.4 1,707.8 (55.9) (166.8) 3,764.5 2,456.7 (5.8) (444.2) 5,771.2 32.64 24.00 29.33 29.57 36.65 26.83 32.14 32.71 16.89 27.94 27.03 26.42 The weighted average fair value of options granted during 1999, 1998 and 1997 approximated $10.65, $22.26, and $16.42, respectively. The following table summarizes information about the Plan’s options outstanding at December 31, 1999: Range of Exercise Prices $9.31 to $17.13 18.50 to 29.88 31.38 to 33.88 34.00 to 53.56 9.31 to 53.56 Number of Options 1,698.7 1,374.3 946.8 1,751.4 5,771.2 Outstanding Weighted Average Years Remaining 9.21 7.25 6.56 7.53 Exercisable Weighted Average Exercise Price $ 14.07 24.03 31.40 37.59 Number of Options 371.8 667.9 482.1 328.3 1,850.1 Weighted Average Exercise Price 15.11 $ 24.04 31.41 35.19 F-25 16. Related Party Transactions Transfer Agreements In June 1992, Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation entered into an asset transfer agreement with Holdings, which is an indirect parent of the Company and certain of its wholly owned subsidiaries (the “Asset Transfer Agreement”), and Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation entered into a real property asset transfer agreement with Holdings (the “Real Property Transfer Agreement” and, together with the Asset Transfer Agreement, the “Transfer Agreements”), and pursuant to such agreements, on June 24, 1992 Holdings transferred assets to Products Corporation and Products Corporation assumed all the liabilities of Holdings, other than certain specifically excluded assets and liabilities (the liabilities excluded are referred to as the “Excluded Liabilities”). Certain consumer products lines sold in demonstrator-assisted distribution channels considered not integral to the Company’s business and which historically had not been profitable (the “Retained Brands”) and certain of the assets and liabilities were retained by Holdings. Holdings agreed to indemnify Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation against losses arising from the Excluded Liabilities, and Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation agreed to indemnify Holdings against losses arising from the liabilities assumed by Products Corporation. The amounts reimbursed by Holdings to Products Corporation for the Excluded Liabilities for 1999, 1998 and 1997 were $0.5, $0.6 and $0.4, respectively. Certain assets and liabilities relating to divested businesses were transferred to Products Corporation on the transfer date and any remaining balances as of December 31 of the applicable year have been reflected in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as of such dates. At December 31, 1999 and 1998, the amounts reflected in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets aggregated a net liability of $23.6, of which $5.2 is included in accrued expenses and other and $18.4 is included in other long-term liabilities as of both dates. Operating Services Agreement In June 1992, Revlon, Inc., Products Corporation and Holdings entered into an operating services agreement (as amended and restated, and as subsequently amended, the “Operating Services Agreement”) pursuant to which Products Corporation has manufactured, marketed, distributed, warehoused and administered, including the collection of accounts receivable, the Retained Brands for Holdings. Pursuant to the Operating Services Agreement, Products Corporation was reimbursed an amount equal to all of its and Revlon, Inc.’s direct and indirect costs incurred in connection with furnishing such services, net of the amounts collected by Products Corporation with respect to the Retained Brands, payable quarterly. The net amounts due from Holdings to Products Corporation for such direct and indirect costs plus a fee equal to 5% of the net sales of the Retained Brands for 1998 and 1997 were $0.9 (which amount was offset against certain notes payable to Holdings) and $1.7, respectively. Reimbursement Agreements Revlon, Inc., Products Corporation and MacAndrews Holdings have entered into reimbursement agreements (the “Reimbursement Agreements”) pursuant to which (i) MacAndrews Holdings is obligated to provide (directly or through affiliates) certain professional and administrative services, including employees, to Revlon, Inc. and its subsidiaries, including Products Corporation, and purchase services from third party providers, such as insurance and legal and accounting services, on behalf of Revlon, Inc. and its subsidiaries, including Products Corporation, to the extent requested by Products Corporation, and (ii) Products Corporation is obligated to provide certain professional and administrative services, including employees, to MacAndrews Holdings (and its affiliates) and purchase services from third party providers, such as insurance and legal and accounting services, on behalf of MacAndrews Holdings (and its affiliates) to the extent requested by MacAndrews Holdings, provided that in each case the performance of such services does not cause an unreasonable burden to MacAndrews Holdings or Products Corporation, as the case may be. The Company reimburses MacAndrews Holdings for the allocable costs of the services purchased for or provided to the Company and its subsidiaries and for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with the provision of such services. MacAndrews Holdings (or such affiliates) reimburses the Company for the allocable costs of the services purchased for or provided to MacAndrews Holdings (or such affiliates) and for the reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with the purchase or provision of such services. The net amounts reimbursed by MacAndrews Holdings to the Company for the services provided under the Reimbursement Agreements for 1999, 1998 and 1997 were $0.5, $3.1 ($0.2 of which was offset against certain notes payable to Holdings), and $4.0, respectively. Each of F-26 Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation, on the one hand, and MacAndrews Holdings, on the other, has agreed to indemnify the other party for losses arising out of the provision of services by it under the Reimbursement Agreements other than losses resulting from its willful misconduct or gross negligence. The Reimbursement Agreements may be terminated by either party on 90 days’ notice. The Company does not intend to request services under the Reimbursement Agreements unless their costs would be at least as favorable to the Company as could be obtained from unaffiliated third parties. Tax Sharing Agreement Holdings, Revlon, Inc., Products Corporation and certain of its subsidiaries and Mafco Holdings are parties to the Tax Sharing Agreement, which is described in Note 13. Since payments to be made under the Tax Sharing Agreement will be determined by the amount of taxes that Revlon, Inc. would otherwise have to pay if it were to file separate federal, state or local income tax returns, the Tax Sharing Agreement will benefit Mafco Holdings to the extent Mafco Holdings can offset the taxable income generated by Revlon, Inc. against losses and tax credits generated by Mafco Holdings and its other subsidiaries. Registration Rights Agreement Prior to the consummation of the Company’s initial public equity offering on March 5, 1996, Revlon, Inc. and Revlon Worldwide Corporation (subsequently merged into REV Holdings), the then direct parent of Revlon, Inc., entered into the Registration Rights Agreement pursuant to which REV Holdings and certain transferees of Revlon, Inc.’s Common Stock held by REV Holdings (the “Holders”) have the right to require Revlon, Inc. to register all or part of the Class A Common Stock owned by such Holders and the Class A Common Stock issuable upon conversion of Revlon, Inc.’s Class B Common Stock owned by such Holders under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (a “Demand Registration”); provided that Revlon, Inc. may postpone giving effect to a Demand Registration up to a period of 30 days if Revlon, Inc. believes such registration might have a material adverse effect on any plan or proposal by Revlon, Inc. with respect to any financing, acquisition, recapitalization, reorganization or other material transaction, or if Revlon, Inc. is in possession of material non-public information that, if publicly disclosed, could result in a material disruption of a major corporate development or transaction then pending or in progress or in other material adverse consequences to Revlon, Inc. In addition, the Holders have the right to participate in registrations by Revlon, Inc. of its Class A Common Stock (a “Piggyback Registration”). The Holders will pay all out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with any Demand Registration. Revlon, Inc. will pay any expenses incurred in connection with a Piggyback Registration, except for underwriting discounts, commissions and expenses attributable to the shares of Class A Common Stock sold by such Holders. Other Pursuant to a lease dated April 2, 1993 (the “Edison Lease”), Holdings leased to Products Corporation the Edison research and development facility for a term of up to 10 years with an annual rent of $1.4 and certain shared operating expenses payable by Products Corporation, which, together with the annual rent, were not to exceed $2.0 per year. Pursuant to an assumption agreement dated February 18, 1993, Holdings agreed to assume all costs and expenses of the ownership and operation of the Edison facility as of January 1, 1993, other than (i) the operating expenses for which Products Corporation was responsible under the Edison Lease and (ii) environmental claims and compliance costs relating to matters that occurred prior to January 1, 1993 up to an amount not to exceed $8.0 (the amount of such claims and costs for which Products Corporation is responsible, the “Environmental Limit”). In addition, pursuant to such assumption agreement, Products Corporation agreed to indemnify Holdings for environmental claims and compliance costs relating to matters that occurred prior to January 1, 1993 up to an amount not to exceed the Environmental Limit and Holdings agreed to indemnify Products Corporation for environmental claims and compliance costs relating to matters that occurred prior to January 1, 1993 in excess of the Environmental Limit and all such claims and costs relating to matters occurring on or after January 1, 1993. Pursuant to an occupancy agreement, during 1998 and 1997 Products Corporation rented from Holdings a portion of the administration building located at the Edison facility and space for a retail store of Products Corporation’s now discontinued retail operation. Products Corporation provided certain administrative services, including accounting, for Holdings with respect to the Edison facility pursuant to which Products Corporation paid on behalf of Holdings costs associated with the Edison facility and was reimbursed by Holdings for such costs, less the amount owed by Products Corporation to Holdings pursuant to the Edison Lease and the occupancy agreement. In August 1998, Holdings sold the Edison facility to an unrelated third party, which assumed F-27 substantially all liability for environmental claims and compliance costs relating to the Edison facility, and in connection with the sale, Products Corporation terminated the Edison Lease and entered into a new lease with the new owner. Holdings agreed to indemnify Products Corporation to the extent rent under the new lease exceeds rent that would have been payable under the terminated Edison Lease had it not been terminated. The net amount reimbursed by Holdings to Products Corporation with respect to the Edison facility for 1999, 1998 and 1997 was $0.2, $0.5, and $0.7, respectively. During 1997, a subsidiary of Products Corporation sold an inactive subsidiary to a company that was its affiliate during 1997 and part of 1998 for approximately $1.0. Effective July 1, 1997, Holdings contributed to Products Corporation substantially all of the assets and liabilities of the Bill Blass business not already owned by Products Corporation. The contributed assets approximated the contributed liabilities and were accounted for at historical cost in a manner similar to that of a pooling of interests and, accordingly, prior period financial statements were restated as if the contribution took place prior to the beginning of the earliest period presented. On February 2, 1998, Revlon Escrow Corp., an affiliate of Products Corporation, issued and sold in a private placement $650.0 aggregate principal amount of 8 5/8% Notes and $250.0 aggregate principal amount of 8 1/8% Notes, with the net proceeds deposited into escrow. The proceeds from the sale of the 8 5/8% and 8 1/8% Notes were used to finance the redemption of Products Corporation’s $555.0 aggregate principal amount of 10 1/2% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2003 (the “Senior Subordinated Notes”) and $260.0 aggregate principal amount of 9 3/8% Senior Notes due 2001 (the “Senior Notes” and, together with the Senior Subordinated Notes, the “Old Notes”). Products Corporation delivered a redemption notice to the holders of the Senior Subordinated Notes for the redemption of the Senior Subordinated Notes on March 4, 1998, at which time Products Corporation assumed the obligations under the 8 5/8% Notes and the related indenture (the “8 5/8% Notes Assumption”), and to the holders of the Senior Notes for the redemption of the Senior Notes on April 1, 1998, at which time Products Corporation assumed the obligations under the 8 1/8% Notes and the related indenture (the “8 1/8% Notes Assumption” and, together with the 8 5/8% Notes Assumption, the “Assumption”). A nationally recognized investment banking firm rendered its written opinion that the Assumption, upon consummation of the redemptions of the Old Notes, and the subsequent release from escrow to Products Corporation of any remaining net proceeds from the sale of the 8 5/8% and 8 1/8% Notes are fair from a financial standpoint to Products Corporation under the 1999 Notes Indenture. Products Corporation leases certain facilities to MacAndrews & Forbes or its affiliates pursuant to occupancy agreements and leases. These included space at Products Corporation’s New York headquarters and at Products Corporation’s offices in London during 1999, 1998 and 1997 and in Hong Kong during 1997 and the first half of 1998. The rent paid to Products Corporation for 1999, 1998 and 1997 was $1.1, $2.9 and $3.8, respectively. Products Corporation’s Credit Agreement is supported by, among other things, guarantees from Holdings and certain of its subsidiaries. The obligations under such guarantees are secured by, among other things, the capital stock and certain assets of certain subsidiaries of Holdings. During 1998, the Company made advances of $0.25, $0.3 and $0.4 to Mr. Fellows, Ms. Dwyer and Mr. Levin, respectively, which advances were repaid in 1999. During 1999, the Company made an advance of $0.4 to Mr. Nugent. During 1997, Products Corporation used an airplane owned by a corporation of which Messrs. Gittis and Drapkin were the sole stockholders, for which Products Corporation paid approximately $0.2 in 1997. During 1998 and 1997, Products Corporation purchased products from a company that was its affiliate during part of 1998 and all of 1997, for which it paid approximately $0.4 and $0.9, respectively. During 1997, Products Corporation provided licensing services to a company that was its affiliate during 1997 In connection with the and part of 1998, for which Products Corporation was paid approximately $0.7 in 1997. termination of the licensing arrangement and its agreement to provide consulting services during 1998, Products Corporation received payments of $2.0 in 1998 and an additional $1.0 in 1999. F-28 A company that was an affiliate of the Company during part of 1999, and during 1998 and 1997 assembled lipstick cases for Products Corporation. Products Corporation paid approximately $0.1, $1.1, and $0.9 for such services for 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively. During 1999, Products Corporation made payments of $0.1 to a fitness center, an interest in which is owned by members of Mr. Drapkin's immediate family, for discounted health club dues for an executive health program of Products Corporation. 17. Commitments and Contingencies The Company currently leases manufacturing, executive, including research and development, and sales facilities and various types of equipment under operating lease agreements. Rental expense was $42.8, $43.7 and $46.1 for the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively. Minimum rental commitments under all noncancelable leases, including those pertaining to idled facilities, with remaining lease terms in excess of one year from December 31, 1999 aggregated $126.9; such commitments for each of the five years subsequent to December 31, 1999 are $31.2, $28.2, $25.1, $12.5 and $5.4, respectively. Such amounts exclude the minimum rentals to be received by the Company in the future under noncancelable subleases of $17.4. The Company and its subsidiaries are defendants in litigation and proceedings involving various matters. In the opinion of the Company’s management, based upon advice of its counsel handling such litigation and proceedings, adverse outcomes, if any, will not result in a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial condition or results of operations. In October and November 1999 six purported class actions were filed by each of Thomas Comport, Boaz Spitz, Felix Ezeir and Amy Hoffman, Ted Parris, Jerry Krim and Dan Gavish individually and on behalf of others similarly situated to them, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, against the Company and certain of its present and former officers and directors, alleging, among other things, violations of Rule 10b-5 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, through the alleged use of deceptive accounting practices during the period from October 29, 1997 through October 2, 1998, inclusive, in the Comport and Hoffman/Parris cases and October 30, 1997 through October 1, 1999, inclusive, in the Spitz, Ezeir, Krim and Gavish cases. Each of the actions seeks a declaration that it is properly brought as a class action, and unspecified damages, attorney fees and other costs. In January 2000, the court consolidated the six cases. The Company believes the allegations contained in these suits to be without merit and intends to vigorously defend against them. F-29 18. Quarterly Results of Operations (Unaudited) The following is a summary of the unaudited quarterly results of operations: Net sales....................................................................... $ 441.1 $ Gross profit.................................................................. 285.4 553.4 $ 368.5 452.4 $ 282.4 Year Ended December 31, 1999 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter 414.4 238.9 Loss from continuing operations.................................. (34.2) (a) (3.9) (a) (164.7) (a) (168.7) (a) Net loss......................................................................... (34.2) (3.9) (164.7) (168.7) Basic loss per common share: Loss from continuing operations......................... $ Net loss per common share..................................$ (0.67) $ (0.67) $ (0.08) $ (0.08) $ (3.21) $ (3.21) $ Diluted loss per common share: Loss from continuing operations......................... $ Net loss per common share..................................$ (0.67) $ (0.67) $ (0.08) $ (0.08) $ (3.21) $ (3.21) $ Year Ended December 31, 1998 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter Net sales....................................................................... $ 497.8 $ 575.3 $ Gross profit.................................................................. (Loss) income from continuing operations.................. Loss from discontinued operations.............................. Extraordinary items-early extinguishments of debt..... Net (loss) income......................................................... 334.5 (15.3) (4.6) (38.2) (58.1) 381.3 11.7 (26.9) (13.5) (28.7) Basic (loss) income per common share: 548.6 $ 362.5 - - 12.7 (Loss) income from continuing operations..........$ (0.30) $ 0.23 $ 0.25 $ Loss from discontinued operations...................... Extraordinary items............................................. (0.09) (0.75) (0.53) (0.26) - - Net (loss) income per common share.................. $ (1.14) $ (0.56) $ 0.25 $ Diluted (loss) income per common share: (Loss) income from continuing operations..........$ (0.30) $ 0.22 $ 0.24 $ Loss from discontinued operations...................... Extraordinary items............................................. (0.09) (0.75) (0.51) (0.26) - - Net (loss) income per common share.................. $ (1.14) $ (0.55) $ 0.24 $ (3.29) (3.29) (3.29) (3.29) 4th Quarter 630.5 408.2 (32.7) - (69.1) (0.71) (0.64) - (1.35) (0.71) (0.64) - (1.35) 12.7 (b) (36.4) (b) (a) Includes business consolidation costs of $8.2, $9.5, $4.4 and $18.1 in the first, second, third and fourth quarters, respectively. (See Note 4). Additionally the fourth quarter includes $22.0 of executive separation costs. (b) Includes a non-recurring gain of $7.1 in the third quarter and business consolidation costs of $42.9 in the fourth quarter (See Note 4). F-30 19. Geographic Information The Company manages its business on the basis of one reportable operating segment. See Note 1 for a brief description of the Company’s business. As of December 31, 1999, the Company had operations established in 28 countries outside of the United States and its products are sold throughout the world. The Company is exposed to the risk of changes in social, political and economic conditions inherent in foreign operations and the Company’s results of operations and the value of its foreign assets are affected by fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. The Company’s operations in Brazil have accounted for approximately 4.1%, 5.4% and 5.8% of the Company’s net sales for 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively. Net sales by geographic area are presented by attributing revenues from external customers on the basis of where the products are sold. During 1999, 1998 and 1997, Wal-Mart and its affiliates accounted for approximately 13.1%, 10.1% and 10.3% of the Company’s consolidated net sales, respectively. Although the loss of Wal-Mart as a customer could have an adverse effect on the Company, the Company believes that its relationship with Wal-Mart is satisfactory and the Company has no reason to believe that Wal-Mart will not continue as a customer. Geographic Areas: Net sales: United States................................................................ International................................................................. Long-lived assets: United States................................................................ International................................................................. Classes of Similar Products: Net sales: Cosmetics, skin care and fragrances............................ Personal care and professional.................................... Year Ended December 31, 1998 $ $ 1,343.7 908.5 2,252.2 $ $ 1999 1,046.2 815.1 1,861.3 1997 1,304.9 933.7 2,238.6 December 31, 1999 1998 611.3 259.4 870.7 $ $ 637.9 287.4 925.3 Year Ended December 31, 1998 $ $ 1,309.7 942.5 2,252.2 $ $ 1999 1,001.8 859.5 1,861.3 1997 1,319.6 919.0 2,238.6 $ $ $ $ $ $ 20. Subsequent Event On March 30, 2000, the Company completed the disposition of its worldwide professional products line, including professional hair care for use in and resale by professional salons, ethnic hair and personal care products, Natural Honey skin care and certain regional toiletries brands, for $315 in cash, before adjustments, plus $10 in purchase price payable in the future, contingent upon the purchasers' achievement of certain rates of return on their investment. The disposition involved the sale of certain of the Company's subsidiaries throughout the world devoted to the professional products line, as well as assets dedicated exclusively or primarily to the lines being disposed. The worldwide professional products line was purchased by a company formed by CVC Capital Partners, the Colomer family and other investors, led by Carlos Colomer, a former manager of the line that was sold, following arms’- length negotiation of the terms of the purchase agreement therefor, including the determination of the amount of the consideration. F-31 Schedule II REVLON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS Years Ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997 (dollars in millions) Balance at beginning of year Charged to cost and expenses Other deductions Balance at end of year Year ended December 31, 1999: Applied against asset accounts: Allowance for doubtful accounts.................... $ Allowance for volume and early payment 14.0 discounts.................................................... $ 14.5 Year ended December 31, 1998: Applied against asset accounts: Allowance for doubtful accounts.................... $ Allowance for volume and early payment 12.0 discounts.................................................... $ 13.9 Year ended December 31, 1997: Applied against asset accounts: Allowance for doubtful accounts.................... $ Allowance for volume and early payment 12.9 discounts.................................................... $ 12.0 $ $ $ $ $ $ 7.7 42.5 4.5 44.8 3.6 46.8 $ $ $ $ $ $ (7.1) (1) $ 14.6 (44.4) (2) $ 12.6 (2.5) (1) $ 14.0 (44.2) (2) $ 14.5 (4.5) (1) $ 12.0 (44.9) (2) $ 13.9 Notes: (1) Doubtful accounts written off, less recoveries, reclassifications and foreign currency translation adjustments. (2) Discounts taken, reclassifications and foreign currency translation adjustments. F-32 Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. SIGNATURES Revlon, Inc. (Registrant) By: /s/ Jeffrey M. Nugent By: /s/ Frank J. Gehrmann By: /s/ Laurence Winoker ---------------------------------------- Jeffrey M. Nugent President, Chief Executive Officer and Director ---------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- Frank J. Gehrmann Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Laurence Winoker Senior Vice President, Corporate Controller and Treasurer B -- E C Dated: March 30, 2000 Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the registrant on March 30, 2000 and in the capacities indicated. Signature Title * ___________________________________ (Ronald O. Perelman) * ___________________________________ (Howard Gittis) /s/ Jeffrey M. Nugent ___________________________________ (Jeffrey M. Nugent) * ___________________________________ (Donald G. Drapkin) * ___________________________________ (Meyer Feldberg) * ___________________________________ (Morton L. Janklow) * Chairman of the Board and Director Director President, Chief Executive Officer and Director Director Director Director Director ___________________________________ (Vernon E. Jordan) * ___________________________________ (Edward J. Landau) * ___________________________________ (Jerry W. Levin) * ___________________________________ (Linda Gosden Robinson) * ___________________________________ (Terry Semel) * ___________________________________ (Martha Stewart) Director Director Director Director Director * Robert K. Kretzman, by signing his name hereto, does hereby sign this report on behalf of the directors of the registrant after whose typed names asterisks appear, pursuant to powers of attorney duly executed by such directors and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. By: /s/ Robert K. Kretzman Robert K. Kretzman Attorney-in-fact Item 1. Description of Business Background Part I Revlon, Inc. (and together with its subsidiaries, the “Company”) conducts its business exclusively through its direct subsidiary, Revlon Consumer Products Corporation and its subsidiaries (“Products Corporation”). The Company manufactures, markets and sells an extensive array of cosmetics and skin care, fragrances and personal care products (“consumer products”). Revlon is one of the world's best known names in cosmetics and is a leading mass market cosmetics brand. The Company believes that its global brand name recognition, product quality and marketing experience have enabled it to create one of the strongest consumer brand franchises in the world, with products sold in approximately 175 countries and territories. The Company's products are marketed under such well-known brand names as Revlon, ColorStay, Revlon Age Defying, Almay and Ultima II in cosmetics; Moon Drops, Eterna 27, Ultima II and Jeanne Gatineau in skin care; Charlie and Fire & Ice in fragrances; and Flex, Outrageous, Mitchum, ColorStay, Colorsilk, Jean Nate, Plusbelle, Bozzano and Colorama in personal care products. To further strengthen its consumer brand franchises, the Company markets each core brand with a distinct and uniform global image, including packaging and advertising, while retaining the flexibility to tailor products to local and regional preferences. The Company was founded by Charles Revson, who revolutionized the cosmetics industry by introducing nail enamels matched to lipsticks in fashion colors over 65 years ago. Today, the Company has leading market positions in many of its principal product categories in the United States self-select distribution channel. The Company's leading market positions for its Revlon brand products include the number one positions in lip makeup and nail enamel (which the Company has occupied for the past 23 years), with the top three selling brands of lip makeup for 1999. The Revlon brand captured in 1996 and continued to hold in 1999 the number one position overall in color cosmetics (consisting of lip, eye and face makeup and nail enamel) in the United States self-select distribution channel, where its market share was 19.7% for 1999. The Company also has leading market positions in several product categories in certain markets outside of the United States, including in Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, Mexico and South Africa. All United States market share and market position data herein for the Company’s brands are based upon retail dollar sales, which are derived from A.C. Nielsen data. A.C. Nielsen measures retail sales volume of products sold in the United States self-select distribution channel. Such data represent A.C. Nielsen’s estimates based upon data gathered by A.C. Nielsen from market samples and are therefore subject to some degree of variance. In the United States, the self-select distribution channel includes independent drug stores and chain drug stores (such as Walgreens, CVS, Eckerds, Rite Aid and Longs), mass volume retailers (such as Wal-Mart, Target Stores and Kmart) and supermarkets and combination supermarket/drug stores (such as Albertson's, Kroger and H.E. Butt). Internationally, the self-select distribution channel includes retailers such as Boots in the United Kingdom and Western Europe, Shoppers Drug Mart in Canada and Wal-Mart worldwide. The foregoing retailers, among others, sell the Company’s products. Recent Developments On October 1, 1999 the Company announced that it had completed its review of strategic alternatives to maximize shareholder value and had decided to pursue the sale of its worldwide professional products line and its non-core Latin American brands Colorama, Juvena, Bozzano and Plusbelle. On March 30, 2000, the Company completed the disposition of its worldwide professional products line, including professional hair care products for use in and resale by professional salons, ethnic hair and personal care products, Natural Honey skin care and certain regional toiletries brands. Proceeds from the sale were $315 million in cash, (before adjustments), plus $10 million in contingent consideration based upon the business’ future performance. A portion of the net proceeds of approximately $150.3 million was used to reduce the aggregate commitment under the Credit Agreement (as described below) and the balance will be available for general corporate purposes. On March 28, 2000, Products Corporation executed a definitive agreement for the sale of its non-core Plusbelle brand in Argentina for $46.5 million in cash. The closing of the sale, which is expected to occur during the 2 second quarter, is subject to various conditions. A portion of the net proceeds of the sale will be used to reduce the aggregate commitment under the Credit Agreement and the balance will be available for general corporate purposes. The Company continues to pursue the sale of its non-core Colorama, Juvena and Bozzano brands in Brazil and is in discussions with prospective purchasers. If a transaction is consummated, a portion of the net proceeds will be applied to reduce the aggregate commitment under the Credit Agreement and the balance will be available for general corporate purposes. In the fourth quarter of 1998, the Company committed to a restructuring plan to realign and reduce personnel, exit excess leased real estate, reconfigure certain manufacturing operations and exit certain product lines. During 1999, the Company recorded a net charge of $20.5 million relating to such restructuring plan, principally for employee severance and other personnel benefits. Additionally, the Company adopted a plan to exit a non-core business as to which a charge of $1.6 million was recorded. realign and consolidate regional activities, During the fourth quarter of 1999, the Company continued to re-evaluate its organizational structure and implemented a new restructuring plan principally at its New York headquarters and New Jersey locations resulting in a charge of $18.1 million principally for employee severance. As part of this restructuring plan, the Company reduced personnel and consolidated excess real estate. In the fourth quarter of 1999, the Company also recorded a $22.0 million charge in connection with executive separation costs. The Company will continue to evaluate its organizational structure, which may result in additional restructuring charges in the future. Business Objectives and Strategy The Company's objective is to become the most dynamic leader in global beauty and skin care by being the most trusted supplier to its customers and consumers, the most innovative in meeting their needs, and the first to market with these innovations. To achieve its objectives the Company's business strategy, which is intended to improve its operating performance, is: • • • • • to attract and retain the best people in the industry; to build consistent global equities; to gain unique insights into its consumer needs and to execute flawlessly against those needs; to understand the needs of and to exceed the expectations of its trade partners; and to operate at benchmark levels of efficiency in all aspects of its business. 3 Products The Company manufactures and markets a variety of products worldwide. The following table sets forth the Company’s principal brands (a). BRAND COSMETICS SKIN CARE FRAGRANCES PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS Flex, Outrageous, Aquamarine, Mitchum, Lady Mitchum, Hi & Dri, ColorStay, Colorsilk, Frost & Glow, Revlon Shadings, Jean Nate′ Almay Moon Drops, Revlon Results, Eterna 27 Charlie, Charlie Red, Charlie White, Ciara Time-Off, Moisture Balance, Moisture Renew, Stay Clean Glowtion, Vital Radiance, CHR Revlon Almay Ultima II Significant Regional Brands Revlon, ColorStay, Revlon Age Defying, Super Lustrous, MoistureStay, Moon Drops, Line & Shine, New Complexion, Top Speed, Wet/Dry Shadow, EveryLash, Timeliner, StreetWear, Revlon Implements Almay, Time-Off, Amazing, One Coat, Stay Smooth, Skin Stays Clean, Moisture Balance Ultima II, Beautiful Nutrient, Wonderwear, The Nakeds, Full Moisture Colorama(b), Juvena(b), Jeanne Gatineau(b), Cutex(b) Jeanne Gatineau(b) Charlie Gold Plusbelle(b), Bozzano(b), Colorama(b), ZP-11 (a) Brands relating to the Company’s professional products line, ethnic products and Natural Honey products are not listed. (b) Trademark owned in certain markets outside the United States. Cosmetics and Skin Care. The Company sells a broad range of cosmetics and skin care products designed to fulfill specifically identified consumer needs, principally priced in the upper range of the self-select distribution channel, including lip makeup, nail color and nail care products, eye and face makeup and skin care products such as lotions, cleansers, creams, toners and moisturizers. Many of the Company's products incorporate patented, patent-pending or proprietary technology. The Company markets several different lines of Revlon lip makeup (which includes lipstick, lip gloss and liner). The Company's breakthrough ColorStay lipcolor, which uses patented transfer-resistant technology that provides long wear, is produced in approximately 50 shades. ColorStay Liquid Lip, a patented lip technology introduced in 1999, is produced in approximately 40 shades and builds on the strengths of the ColorStay foundation by offering long- wearing benefits in a new product form, which enhances comfort and shine. Super Lustrous lipstick is produced in approximately 70 shades. Moon Drops, a moisturizing lipstick, is produced in approximately 50 shades. Line & Shine 4 utilizes an innovative product form, combining lipliner and lip gloss in one package, and is produced in approximately 20 shades. MoistureStay uses patent-pending technology to moisturize the lips even after the color wears off, and is produced in approximately 40 shades. The Company's nail color and nail care lines include enamels, cuticle preparations and enamel removers. The Company's flagship Revlon nail enamel is produced in approximately 85 shades and uses a patented formula that provides consumers with improved wear, application, shine and gloss in a toluene-free and formaldehyde-free formula. Top Speed nail enamel is produced in approximately 80 shades and contains a patented speed drying polymer formula, which sets in 60 seconds. Revlon has the number one position in nail enamel in the United States self-select distribution channel. The Company also sells Cutex nail polish remover and nail care products in certain countries outside the United States. The Company sells face makeup, including foundation, powder, blush and concealers, under such Revlon brand names as Revlon Age Defying, which is targeted for women in the over 35 age bracket; ColorStay, which uses patent-pending transfer-resistant technology that provides long wear and won’t rub off benefits; and New Complexion, for consumers in the 18 to 34 age bracket. The Company's eye makeup products include mascaras, eyeliners, eye shadows and brow color. ColorStay eyecolor, mascara and brow color, Everylash mascara, Softstroke eyeliners and Revlon Wet/Dry eye shadows are targeted for women in the 18 to 49 age bracket. The Company's Almay brand consists of a complete line of hypo-allergenic, dermatologist-tested, fragrance-free cosmetics and skin care products targeted for consumers who want "a fresh, healthy, effortless look." Almay products include lip makeup, nail color, eye and face makeup and skin care products. In 1999, Almay expanded its flagship One Coat franchise to include One Coat Mascara Color & Curl; other One Coat products include One Coat Lipcolor, One Coat Nail Color, One Coat Gel Eye Pencil and One Coat Lip Shine. The Company also introduced Skin Stays Clean liquid and compact foundation makeup with its patented “clean pore complex.” Almay expanded its Stay Smooth franchise beyond its Anti-Chap Lipliner to Stay Smooth Mascara, a defining mascara with a built in comb. The Almay Amazing Collection features long-wearing mascaras, foundations and lipcolor. The Company's StreetWear brand consists of a quality, value-priced line of nail enamels, mascaras, lip and eye liners, lip glosses and body accessories that are targeted for the young, beauty savvy consumer. The Company's premium priced cosmetics and skin care products are sold under the Ultima II brand name, which is the Company's flagship premium priced brand sold throughout the world. Ultima II's products include lip makeup, eye and face makeup and skin care products including Glowtion, a line of skin brighteners that combines skin care and color; Full Moisture Foundation and lipcolor, Vital Radiance and CHR skin care products; the Beautiful Nutrient collection, a complete line of nourishing makeup that provides advanced nutrient protection against dryness; The Nakeds makeup, a trend-setting line of makeup emphasizing neutral colors; and Wonderwear. The Wonderwear collection includes a long-wearing foundation that uses patented technology, cheek and eyecolor products that use proprietary technology that provides long wear, and Wonderwear lipstick, which uses patented transfer-resistant technology. In the U.S. the Company has broadened the distribution of Ultima II into the self-select channel. The Company sells implements, which include nail and eye grooming tools such as clippers, scissors, files, tweezers and eye lash curlers. The Company's implements are sold individually and in sets under the Revlon brand name and are the number one brand in the United States self-select distribution channel. The Company also sells cosmetics in international markets under regional brand names including Colorama and Juvena in Brazil. The Company's skin care products, including moisturizers, are sold under brand names, including Eterna 27, Moon Drops, Revlon Results, Almay Time-Off Revitalizer, Clear Complexion and Ultima II Vital Radiance. In addition, the Company sells skin care products in international markets under internationally recognized brand names and under various regional brands, including the Company's premium priced Jeanne Gatineau. 5 Fragrances. The Company sells a selection of moderately priced and premium priced fragrances, including perfumes, eau de toilettes and colognes. The Company's portfolio includes fragrances such as Charlie and Ciara and line extensions such as Charlie Red and Charlie White. The Company's Charlie fragrance has been a market leader since the mid-1970's. In international markets, the Company distributes under license certain brands, including Versace and Van Gils. Personal Care Products. The Company sells a broad line of personal care consumer products, which complements its core cosmetics lines and enables the Company to meet the consumer's broader beauty care needs. In the self-select distribution channel, the Company sells haircare, antiperspirant and other personal care products, including the Flex, Outrageous and Aquamarine haircare lines throughout the world and the Colorama, Bozzano, Plusbelle and Juvena brands outside the United States; the breakthrough, patented ColorStay, as well as Colorsilk, Revlon Shadings and Frost & Glow hair coloring lines throughout most of the world; and the Mitchum, Lady Mitchum and Hi & Dri antiperspirant brands throughout the world. The Company also markets hypo-allergenic personal care products, including sunscreens, moisturizers and antiperspirants, under the Almay brand. Marketing Consumer Products. The Company markets extensive consumer product lines at a range of retail prices primarily through the self-select distribution channel and markets select premium lines through demonstrator-assisted channels, principally outside the U.S. Each line is distinctively positioned and is marketed globally with consistently recognizable logos, packaging and advertising designed to differentiate it from other brands. The Company's existing consumer product lines are carefully segmented, and new product lines are developed, to target specific consumer needs as measured by focus groups and other market research techniques. The Company uses print and television advertising and point-of-sale merchandising, including displays and samples. The Company's marketing emphasizes a uniform global image and product for its portfolio of core brands, including Revlon, ColorStay, Revlon Age Defying, Almay, Ultima II, Flex, Charlie, Outrageous and Mitchum. The Company coordinates advertising campaigns with in-store promotional and other marketing activities. The Company develops jointly with retailers carefully tailored advertising, point-of-purchase and other focused marketing programs. The Company uses network and spot television advertising, national cable advertising and print advertising in major general interest, women's fashion and women's service magazines, as well as coupons, magazine inserts and point-of-sale testers. The Company also uses cooperative advertising programs with some retailers, supported by Company-paid or Company-subsidized demonstrators, and coordinated in-store promotions and displays. The Company also has developed unique marketing materials such as the "Revlon Report," a glossy, color pamphlet distributed in magazines and on merchandising units, available in approximately 80 countries and approximately 20 languages, which highlights seasonal and other fashion and color trends, describes the Company's products that address those trends and contains coupons, rebate offers and other promotional material to encourage consumers to try the Company's products. Other marketing materials designed to introduce the Company's newest products to consumers and encourage trial and purchase include point-of-sale testers on the Company's display units that provide information about, and permit consumers to test, the Company's products, thereby achieving the benefits of an in-store demonstrator without the corresponding cost, magazine inserts containing samples of the Company's newest products, trial size products and "shade samplers," which are collections of trial size products in different shades. Additionally, the Company has its own website, which features current product and promotional information. New Product Development and Research and Development it The Company believes that is an industry leader in the development of innovative and techno- logically-advanced consumer products. The Company's marketing and research and development groups identify consumer needs and shifts in consumer preferences in order to develop new products, tailor line extensions and promotions and redesign or reformulate existing products to satisfy such needs or preferences. The Company's research and development group comprises departments specialized in the technologies critical to the Company's that promotes inter-departmental, various product categories as well as an advanced technology department cross-functional research on a wide range of technologies to develop new and innovative products. The Company independently develops substantially all of its new products. The Company also has entered into joint research projects with major universities and commercial laboratories to develop advanced technologies. 6 The Company believes that its Edison, New Jersey facility is one of the most extensive cosmetics research and development facilities in the United States. The scientists at the Edison facility are responsible for all of the Company's new product research worldwide, performing research for new products, ideas, concepts and packaging. The Company also has satellite research facilities in Brazil and France. The research and development group at the Edison facility also performs extensive safety and quality tests on the Company's products, including toxicology, microbiology and package testing. Additionally, quality control testing is performed at each manufacturing facility. As of December 31, 1999, the Company employed approximately 200 people in its research and development activities, toxicology, chemistry, microbiology, engineering, biology, dermatology and quality control. In 1999, 1998 and 1997, the Company spent approximately $32.9 million, $31.9 million and $29.7 million, respectively, on research and development activities. including specialists in pharmacology, Manufacturing and Related Operations and Raw Materials The Company manufactures Revlon brand color cosmetics, personal care products and fragrances and Ultima II cosmetics and skin treatment products for sale in the United States, Japan and most of the countries in Latin America and Southeast Asia at its Phoenix, Arizona facility and its Canadian facility. The Company manufactures Almay brand products for sale throughout the world at its Oxford, North Carolina facility. Implements for sale throughout the world are manufactured and/or assembled at the Company's Irvington, New Jersey facility. The Phoenix and Oxford facilities have been ISO-9002 certified. ISO-9002 certification is an internationally recognized standard for manufacturing facilities, which signifies that the manufacturing facility has achieved and maintains certain performance and quality commitment standards. The Company manufactures its entire line of consumer products (except implements) for sale in most of Europe at its Maesteg, South Wales facility. Production of cosmetics and personal care products also currently takes place at the Company's facilities in Canada, Venezuela, Mexico, New Zealand, Brazil, Argentina, France and South Africa. Production of color cosmetics for Japan and Mexico has been shifted primarily to the United States. The Maesteg facility has been certified by the British equivalent of ISO-9002. The globalization of the Company's core brands allows the Company to centralize production of some product categories for sale throughout the world within designated facilities and shift production of certain other product categories to more cost effective manufacturing sites to reduce production costs. Shifts of production may result in the closing of certain of the Company's manufacturing facilities, and the Company continually reviews its needs in this regard. In addition, as part of its efforts to continuously reduce costs, the Company attempts to ensure that a significant portion of its capital expenditures is devoted to improving operating efficiencies. The Company purchases raw materials and components throughout the world. The Company continuously pursues reductions in cost of goods through the global sourcing of raw materials and components from qualified vendors, utilizing its large purchasing capacity to maximize cost savings. The global sourcing of raw materials and components from accredited vendors also ensures the quality of the raw materials and components. The Company believes that alternate sources of raw materials and components exist and does not anticipate any significant shortages of, or difficulty in obtaining, such materials. The Company's improvements in manufacturing, sourcing and related operations have contributed to improved customer service, including an improvement in the percentage of timely order fulfillment from most of the Company's principal manufacturing facilities, and the timeliness and accuracy of new product and promotion deliveries. To promote the Company's understanding of and responsiveness to the needs of its retail customers, the Company has dedicated teams assigned to significant accounts, and has provided retail accounts with a designated customer service representative. As a result of these efforts, accompanied by stronger and more customer-focused management, the Company has developed strong relationships with its retailers. 7 Information Systems As part of the Company's comprehensive business process enhancement program the Company's management information systems have been substantially upgraded to provide comprehensive order processing, production and accounting support for the Company's business, as well as to upgrade certain information technology to be Year 2000 compliant. In addition, the Company developed a comprehensive plan to address Year 2000 issues. The Year 2000 plan addressed three main areas: (a) information technology systems; (b) non-information technology systems (including factory equipment, building systems and other embedded systems); and (c) business partner readiness (including without limitation customers, inventory and non-inventory suppliers, service suppliers, banks, insurance companies and tax and other governmental agencies). Since January 1, 2000, the Company has not experienced any adverse consequences resulting from Year 2000 issues relative to its systems or business partners. The Company believes that incremental out-of-pocket costs of its Year 2000 program (which do not include costs incurred in connection with the Company's comprehensive business process enhancement program) were not material. These costs included the cost of third party consultants, remediation of existing computer software and replacement and remediation of embedded systems. Distribution The Company's products are sold in approximately 175 countries and territories. The Company's worldwide sales force had approximately 1,000 people as of December 31, 1999 (which includes approximately 300 employees related to the professional products line which was sold in March 2000), including dedicated sales forces for cosmetics, skin care and fragrance products in the self-select distribution channel, for the demonstrator-assisted distribution channel, for personal care products distribution and, prior to the disposition of the worldwide professional products line, for salon distribution. In addition, the Company utilizes sales representatives and independent distributors to serve specialized markets and related distribution channels. United States. Net sales in the United States accounted for approximately 56.2% of the Company's 1999 net sales, a majority of which were made in the self-select distribution channel. The Company also sells a broad range of consumer products to United States Government military exchanges and commissaries. The Company licenses its trademarks to select manufacturers for products that the Company believes have the potential to extend the Company's brand names and image. As of December 31, 1999, 10 licenses were in effect relating to 15 product categories to be marketed in the self-select distribution channel. Pursuant to the licenses, the Company retains strict control over product design and development, product quality, advertising and use of its trademarks. These licensing arrangements offer opportunities for the Company to generate revenues and cash flow through earned royalties. International. Net sales outside the United States accounted for approximately 43.8% of the Company's 1999 net sales. The ten largest countries in terms of these sales, which include, among others, Spain, Brazil, the United Kingdom, Argentina, Australia, South Africa and Canada, accounted for approximately 31.9% of the Company's net sales in 1999. The Company is increasing distribution through the expanding self-select distribution channels outside the United States, such as drug stores/chemists, hypermarkets/mass volume retailers and variety stores, as these channels gain importance. The Company also distributes outside the United States through department stores and specialty stores such as perfumeries. At December 31, 1999, the Company actively sold its products through wholly owned subsidiaries established in 28 countries outside of the United States and through a large number of distributors and licensees elsewhere around the world. The Company continues to pursue strategies to establish its presence in new markets where the Company identifies opportunities for growth. In addition, the Company is building a franchise through local distributorships in northern and central Africa, where the Company intends to expand the distribution of its products by capitalizing on its market strengths in South Africa. 8 Customers The Company's principal customers include large mass volume retailers and chain drug stores, including such well known retailers as Wal-Mart, Target, Kmart, Walgreens, Rite Aid, CVS, Eckerds, Albertsons Drugs and Longs in the United States, Boots in the United Kingdom, Carrefour in Western Europe and Wal-Mart internationally. Wal-Mart and its affiliates worldwide accounted for approximately 13.1% of the Company's 1999 consolidated net sales. Although the loss of Wal-Mart as a customer could have an adverse effect on the Company, the Company believes that its relationship with Wal-Mart is satisfactory and the Company has no reason to believe that Wal-Mart will not continue as a customer. Competition The consumer products business is characterized by vigorous competition throughout the world. Brand recognition, together with product quality, performance and price and the extent to which consumers are educated on product benefits, have a marked influence on consumers' choices among competing products and brands. Advertising, promotion, merchandising and packaging, and the timing of new product introductions and line extensions, also have a significant impact on buying decisions, and the structure and quality of the sales force affect product reception, in-store position, permanent display space and inventory levels in retail outlets. The Company competes in most of its product categories against a number of companies, a number of which have substantially greater resources than the Company. In addition to products sold in the self-select and demonstrator-assisted distribution channels, the Company's products also compete with similar products sold door-to-door or through mail order or telemarketing by representatives of direct sales companies. The Company's principal competitors include L'Oreal S.A., The Procter & Gamble Company, Unilever N.V. and Estee Lauder, Inc. Seasonality The Company's business is subject to certain seasonal fluctuations, with net sales in the second half of the year benefiting slightly from increased retailer purchases in the United States for the back-to-school and Christmas selling seasons. Patents, Trademarks and Proprietary Technology The Company's major trademarks are registered in the United States and in many other countries, and the Company considers trademark protection to be very important to its business. Significant trademarks include Revlon, ColorStay, Revlon Age Defying, StreetWear, Flex, Plusbelle, Cutex (outside the U.S.), Mitchum, Eterna 27, Ultima II, Almay, Charlie, Jean Nate´, Revlon Results, Colorama, Fire & Ice, Moon Drops, Super Lustrous, Wonderwear and Colorsilk. The Company utilizes certain proprietary or patented technologies in the formulation or manufacture of a number of the Company's products, including ColorStay lipcolor and cosmetics, ColorStay hair color, classic Revlon nail enamel, Top Speed nail enamel, Revlon Age Defying foundation and cosmetics, New Complexion makeup, Wonderwear foundation, Wonderwear lipstick, Almay Time-Off skin care and makeup, Almay Amazing cosmetics, Almay One Coat eye makeup and cosmetics, Ultima II Vital Radiance skin care products and Outrageous shampoo. The Company also protects certain of its packaging and component concepts through design patents. The Company considers its proprietary technology and patent protection to be important to its business. 9 Government Regulation The Company is subject to regulation by the Federal Trade Commission and the Food and Drug Administration (the "FDA") in the United States, as well as various other federal, state, local and foreign regulatory authorities. The Phoenix, Arizona and Oxford, North Carolina manufacturing facilities are registered with the FDA as drug manufacturing establishments, permitting the manufacture of cosmetics that contain over-the-counter drug ingredients such as sunscreens. Compliance with federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations pertaining to discharge of materials into the environment, or otherwise relating to the protection of the environment, has not had, and is not anticipated to have, a material effect upon the capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position of the Company. State and local regulations in the United States that are designed to protect consumers or the environment have an increasing influence on product claims, contents and packaging. Industry Segments, Foreign and Domestic Operations The Company operates in a single segment. Certain geographic, financial and other information of the Company is set forth in Note 19 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company. Employees As of December 31, 1999, the Company employed the equivalent of approximately 11,000 full-time persons (which includes approximately 1,900 employees related to the professional products line which was sold in March 2000). As of December 31, 1999, approximately 1,700 of such employees in the United States were covered by collective bargaining agreements, (which includes approximately 400 employees related to the professional products line). The Company believes that its employee relations are satisfactory. Although the Company has experienced minor work stoppages of limited duration in the past in the ordinary course of business, such work stoppages have not had a material effect on the Company's results of operations or financial condition. 10 Item 2. Properties The following table sets forth as of December 31, 1999 the Company's major manufacturing, research and warehouse/distribution facilities, all of which are owned except where otherwise noted. Location Use Approximate Floor Space Sq. Ft. Oxford, North Carolina…………….. Manufacturing, warehousing, distribution and office Phoenix, Arizona…………………… Manufacturing, warehousing, distribution and office (partially leased) Jacksonville, Florida (a).................... Manufacturing, warehousing, distribution, research and office Edison, New Jersey....................….. Research and office (leased) Irvington, New Jersey...................... Manufacturing, warehousing and office São Paulo, Brazil............................. Manufacturing, warehousing, distribution, office and research Maesteg, South Wales............................................... Manufacturing, distribution and office Mississauga, Canada........................ Manufacturing, warehousing, distribution and office Santa Maria, Spain (a)....................... Manufacturing and warehousing Caracas, Venezuela.......................... Manufacturing, distribution and office Kempton Park, South Africa............ Warehousing, distribution and office (leased) Canberra, Australia.......................... Warehousing, distribution and office Isando, South Africa........................ Manufacturing, warehousing, distribution and office Buenos Aires, Argentina..............… Manufacturing, warehousing, distribution and office Bologna, Italy (a).............................. Manufacturing, warehousing, distribution and office Dublin, Ireland (a)............................ Manufacturing, warehousing, distribution and office (a) Facility was transferred to the purchaser of the professional products line in March 2000. 1,012,000 706,000 526,000 175,000 96,000 435,000 316,000 245,000 173,000 145,000 127,000 125,000 94,000 75,000 60,000 32,500 In addition to the facilities described above, additional facilities are owned and leased in various areas throughout the world, including the lease for the Company's executive offices in New York, New York (346,000 square feet, of which approximately 19,000 square feet were sublet to affiliates of the Company and approximately 78,000 square feet were sublet to unaffiliated third parties as of December 31, 1999). Management considers the Company's facilities to be well-maintained and satisfactory for the Company's operations, and believes that the Company's facilities provide sufficient capacity for its current and expected production requirements. Item 3. Legal Proceedings The Company is involved in various routine legal proceedings incident to the ordinary course of its business. The Company believes that the outcome of all pending legal proceedings in the aggregate is unlikely to have a material adverse effect on the business or consolidated financial condition of the Company. In October and November 1999 six purported class actions were filed by each of Thomas Comport, Boaz Spitz, Felix Ezeir and Amy Hoffman, Ted Parris, Jerry Krim and Dan Gavish individually and on behalf of others similarly situated to them, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, against the Company and certain of its present and former officers and directors, alleging, among other things, violations of Rule 10b-5 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, through the alleged use of deceptive accounting practices during the period from October 29, 1997 through October 2, 1998, inclusive, in the Comport and 11 Hoffman/Parris cases and October 30, 1997 through October 1, 1999, inclusive, in the Spitz, Ezeir, Krim and Gavish cases. Each of the actions seeks a declaration that it is properly brought as a class action, and unspecified damages, attorney fees and other costs. In January 2000, the court consolidated the six cases. The Company believes the allegations contained in these suits to be without merit and intends to vigorously defend against them. Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders No matter was submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this report. PART II Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings Inc. (“MacAndrews Holdings”), which is indirectly wholly owned by Ronald O. Perelman, through REV Holdings Inc. (“REV Holdings”), beneficially owns 11,250,000 shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock (representing 56.3% of the outstanding shares of Class A Common Stock) and all of the outstanding 31,250,000 shares of Class B Common Stock, which together represent approximately 83% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s Common Stock and have approximately 97.4% of the combined voting power of the outstanding shares of the Company’s Common Stock. The remaining 8,742,837 shares of Class A Common Stock outstanding at March 8, 2000 are owned by the public. As of March 8, 2000, there were 744 holders of record of Class A Common Stock. No dividends were declared or paid during 1999 or 1998. The terms of the Credit Agreement, the 8 5/8% Notes (as hereinafter defined), the 8 1/8% Notes (as hereinafter defined) and the 9% Notes (as hereinafter defined) currently restrict the ability of Products Corporation to pay dividends or make distributions to Revlon, Inc. See the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company and the Notes thereto. The table below shows the Company’s high and low quarterly stock prices for the years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998. 1999 Quarterly Stock Prices (1) 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter High......................................................................$ 22 1/4 $ 32 $ 29 1/8 $ 12 Low....................................................................... 13 1/2 19 1/8 18 7 1/2 High......................................................................$ 51 13/16 $ 56 1/16 $ Low....................................................................... 33 5/8 47 9/16 54 1/2 $ 30 7/8 1998 Quarterly Stock Prices (1) 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter 27 13/16 12 1/2 (1) Represents the closing price per share on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), which is the exchange on which shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock are listed. The Company’s symbol is REV. 12 Item 6. Selected Financial Data The Consolidated Statements of Operations Data for each of the years in the five-year period ended December 31, 1999 and the Balance Sheet Data as of December 31, 1999, 1998, 1997 and 1996 are derived from the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company, which have been audited by KPMG LLP, independent certified public accountants. The Balance Sheet Data as of December 31, 1995 is derived from unaudited consolidated financial statements, which have been restated to reflect the Company’s former retail and outlet store business as discontinued operations. The Selected Consolidated Financial Data should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company and the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” Statements of Operations Data: Net sales......................................................... $ 1,861.3 $ 2,252.2 $ 2,238.6 $ 2,092.1 $ 1,867.3 1999 Year Ended December 31, 1998 1996 1997 (dollars in millions, except per share data) 1995 Operating (loss) income................................. (212.6) (a) 124.6 (b) 214.9 (c) 199.2 (Loss) income from continuing operations.... (371.5) (27.3) Basic (loss) income from continuing operations per common share.................. $ (7.25) $ (0.53) Diluted (loss) income from continuing operations per common share.................. $ (7.25) $ (0.53) 57.8 1.13 1.13 $ $ Weighted average number of common shares outstanding: (d) Basic...................................................... Diluted................................................... 51,240,225 51,240,225 51,217,997 51,217,997 51,131,440 51,544,318 1999 1998 December 31, 1997 (dollars in millions) Balance Sheet Data: Total assets.................................................... $ Long-term debt, including current portion.... Total stockholders' deficiency....................... $ 1,558.3 1,772.1 (1,014.9) 1,830.0 1,660.0 (648.0) $ 1,756.0 1,425.2 (458.5) $ $ $ 147.5 (37.2) (0.88) (0.88) 24.4 0.49 0.49 $ $ 49,687,500 49,818,792 42,500,000 42,500,000 1996 1995 $ 1,617.3 1,361.0 (497.1) 1,532.6 1,476.7 (702.3) (a) Includes business consolidation costs and other, net and executive separation costs of $40.2 million and $22.0 million, respectively. See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. (b) Includes business consolidation costs and other, net aggregating $35.8 million. See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. (c) Includes business consolidation costs and other, net, of $3.6 million. See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. (d) Represents the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. 13 Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (dollars in millions) Overview The Company operates in a single segment and manufactures, markets and sells an extensive array of cosmetics and skin care, fragrances and personal care products, and, until the disposition of its professional products line in March 2000, had included professional products, which consisted of hair and nail care products principally for use in and resale by professional salons. In addition, the Company has a licensing group. Results of Operations The following table sets forth the Company’s net sales for each of the last three years: Net sales: United States ................................................................... International .................................................................... Year Ended December 31, 1999 1,046.2 815.1 1,861.3 $ $ $ $ 1998 1,343.7 908.5 2,252.2 1997 1,304.9 933.7 2,238.6 $ $ The following table sets forth certain statements of operations data as a percentage of net sales for each of the last three years: Year Ended December 31, 1999 1998 1997 Cost of sales*................................................................... Gross profit...................................................................... 36.9 % 63.1 34.0 % 66.0 33.2 % 66.8 Selling, general and administrative expenses ("SG&A")**............................................… Business consolidation costs and other, net..................... Operating (loss) income................................................... 72.4 2.2 (11.4) 59.0 1.5 5.5 57.1 0.1 9.6 * 1998 includes $2.7 (0.1% of net sales) for charges related to business consolidation costs. ** 1999 includes $22.0 (1.2% of net sales) for charges related to executive separation costs. 14 Year ended December 31, 1999 compared with year ended December 31, 1998 Net sales Net sales were $1,861.3 and $2,252.2 for 1999 and 1998, respectively, a decrease of $390.9, or 17.4% on a reported basis (a decrease of 14.9% on a constant U.S. dollar basis). United States. Net sales in the United States were $1,046.2 for 1999 compared with $1,343.7 for 1998, a decrease of $297.5, or 22.1%. Net sales for 1999 were adversely affected by lower than anticipated share growth, competitive activities and a reduction in the level of Company shipments to certain retailers to achieve such retailers’ new lower inventory target levels. The reduction of retailers’ target inventory levels will continue and is expected to adversely impact sales through the first half of 2000. New products in 1999 included EveryLash mascara, MoistureStay Sheer Lip Color, Revlon Age Defying compact makeup, Wet/Dry Eye Shadow, Almay Stay Smooth lip makeup and mascara, Almay Foundation with Skin Stays Clean attributes, products in the Almay One Coat collection, Mitchum Cool Dry antiperspirant and ColorStay Liquid Lip. International. Net sales outside the United States were $815.1 for 1999 compared with $908.5 for 1998, a decrease of $93.4, or 10.3%, on a reported basis (a decrease of 3.7% on a constant U.S. dollar basis). Net sales for 1999 on a constant U.S. dollar basis were affected by unfavorable economic conditions in certain markets outside the U.S., principally Brazil, which restrained consumer and trade demand, increased competitive activity and lower sales in certain markets, principally the United Kingdom and Canada. The decrease in net sales for 1999 on a reported basis also reflects the unfavorable effect on sales of a stronger U.S. dollar against certain foreign currencies, particularly the Brazilian real. Sales outside the United States are divided into three geographic regions. In Europe, which comprises Europe, the Middle East and Africa, net sales decreased by 9.2% on a reported basis to $369.5 for 1999 as compared with 1998 (a decrease of 4.3% on a constant U.S. dollar basis). In the Western Hemisphere, which comprises Canada, Mexico, Central America, South America and Puerto Rico, net sales decreased by 15.4% on a reported basis to $303.1 for 1999 as compared with 1998 (a decrease of 3.0% on a constant U.S. dollar basis). The Company's operations in Brazil are significant. In Brazil, net sales were $76.1 on a reported basis for 1999 compared with $122.5 for 1998, a decrease of $46.4, or 37.9% (a decrease of 3.1% on a constant U.S. dollar basis). On a reported basis, net sales in Brazil were adversely affected by the stronger U.S. dollar against the Brazilian real, unfavorable economic conditions and increased competitive activities. In the Far East, net sales decreased by 0.7% on a reported basis to $142.5 for 1999 as compared with 1998 (a decrease of 4.0% on a constant U.S. dollar basis). Net sales outside the United States, including, without limitation, in Brazil, may be adversely affected by generally weak economic conditions, political and economic uncertainties, including, without limitation, currency fluctuations and competitive activities in certain markets. Cost of sales As a percentage of net sales, cost of sales was 36.9% for 1999 compared with 34.0% for 1998. The increase in cost of sales as a percentage of net sales for 1999 compared with 1998 is due to changes in product mix, the effect of weaker local currencies on the cost of imported purchases by subsidiaries outside the U.S. and the effect of lower net sales. SG&A expenses As a percentage of net sales, SG&A expenses were 72.4% ($1,347.6) for 1999 compared with 59.0% ($1,328.8) for 1998. The increase in SG&A expenses as a percentage of net sales is due in large measure to the reduced levels of sales coupled with the Company’s decision to maintain throughout the second half of 1999 brand support intended to drive consumer purchasing and facilitate the inventory reduction process by U.S. retailers In addition, SG&A increased as a result of executive separation costs of $22.0, which were referred to earlier. partially offset by savings from the Company’s restructuring plan from 1998. 15 Business consolidation costs and other, net In the fourth quarter of 1998, the Company committed to a restructuring plan to realign and reduce personnel, exit excess leased real estate, reconfigure certain manufacturing operations and exit certain product lines. During 1999, the Company continued to implement such restructuring plan for which it recorded a charge of $20.5 for employee severance and other personnel benefits, costs associated with the exit from leased facilities as well as other costs. Also in 1999, the Company consummated an exit from a non-core business, resulting in an additional charge of $1.6, which is included in business consolidation costs and other, net. realign and consolidate regional activities, During the fourth quarter of 1999, the Company continued to re-evaluate its organizational structure and implemented a new restructuring plan principally at its New York headquarters and New Jersey locations resulting in a charge of $18.1 principally for employee severance. As part of this new restructuring plan, the Company reduced personnel and consolidated excess real estate. As a result of the new restructuring plan, executive separation costs, and the elimination of open positions, the Company anticipates annual savings of between $45 and $50, beginning in 2000. Operating (loss) income As a result of the foregoing, operating (loss) for 1999 was $(212.6) compared to operating income of $124.6 for 1998. Other expenses/(income) Interest expense was $147.9 for 1999 compared with $137.9 for 1998. The increase in interest expense for 1999 as compared with 1998 is due to higher average outstanding debt and higher interest rates under the Credit Agreement, partially offset by lower interest rates as a result of the refinancings in 1998. Foreign currency (gains) losses, net, were $(0.5) for 1999 compared with $4.6 in 1998. Foreign currency losses, net for 1998 consisted primarily of losses in several markets in Latin America. Provision for income taxes The provision for income taxes was $9.1 for 1999 compared with $5.0 for 1998. Discontinued operations During 1998, the Company completed the disposition of its approximately 85% ownership interest in The Cosmetic Center, Inc. (“CCI”) and, accordingly, the results of operations of CCI had been reported as discontinued operations along with the loss on disposal of such operations. 16 Year ended December 31, 1998 compared with year ended December 31, 1997 Net sales Net sales were $2,252.2 and $2,238.6 for 1998 and 1997, respectively, an increase of $13.6, or 0.6% (or 2.7% on a constant U.S. dollar basis). United States. Net sales in the United States were $1,343.7 for 1998 compared with $1,304.9 for 1997, an increase of $38.8, or 3.0%. The increase in net sales in 1998 reflects improvements in net sales of products in the Company's Almay and Ultima franchises and expansion of certain of the Company’s professional product lines including an acquisition. For the first half of 1998, net sales for the Company’s Revlon franchise increased as compared to the first half of 1997 as a result of continued consumer acceptance of new product offerings and general improvement in consumer demand for the Company's color cosmetics. Beginning in third quarter of 1998, such sales were adversely affected by a slowdown in the rate of growth in the mass market color cosmetics category and a leveling of market share. Additionally, net sales for 1998 were impacted by reduced purchases by some retailers, particularly chain drug stores, resulting from improved inventory management through systems upgrades and inventory reductions following several recent business combinations. Revlon brand color cosmetics continued as the number one brand in dollar market share in the U.S. self-select distribution channel. New product introductions (including, in 1998, certain products launched during 1997) generated incremental net sales in 1998, principally as a result of launches of Top Speed nail enamel, MoistureStay lip makeup, products in the New Complexion line, ColorStay shampoo, Almay Stay Smooth lip makeup, products in the Almay Amazing collection, products in the Almay One Coat collection, products in the Ultima II Beautiful Nutrient and Ultima II Full Moisture lipcolor lines and Ultima II Glowtion skin brighteners. International. Net sales outside the United States were $908.5 for 1998 compared with $933.7 for 1997, a decrease of $25.2, or 2.7%, on a reported basis (an increase of 2.4% on a constant U.S. dollar basis). The increase in net sales for 1998 on a constant dollar basis reflects the benefits of increased distribution, including acquisitions, and successful new product introductions in several markets including MoistureStay lip makeup and Top Speed nail enamel. The decrease in net sales for 1998 on a reported basis reflects the unfavorable effect on sales of a stronger U.S. dollar against most foreign currencies and unfavorable economic conditions in several international markets. These unfavorable economic conditions restrained consumer and trade demand outside the U.S., particularly in South America and the Far East, as well as Russia and other developing economies. Sales outside the United States are divided into three geographic regions. In Europe, which comprises Europe, the Middle East and Africa, net sales decreased by 2.6% on a reported basis to $406.9 for 1998 as compared with 1997 (an increase of 0.5% on a constant U.S. dollar basis). In the Western Hemisphere, which comprises Canada, Mexico, Central America, South America and Puerto Rico, net sales increased by 4.7% on a reported basis to $358.1 for 1998 as compared with 1997 (an increase of 9.5% on a constant U.S. dollar basis). The Company's operations in Brazil are significant. In Brazil, net sales were $122.5 on a reported basis for 1998 compared with $130.9 for 1997, a decrease of $8.4, or 6.4% (an increase of 0.5% on a constant U.S. dollar basis). On a reported basis, net sales in Brazil were adversely affected by the stronger U.S. dollar against the Brazilian real. In the Far East, net sales decreased by 17.5% on a reported basis to $143.5 for 1998 as compared with 1997 (a decrease of 7.4% on a constant U.S. dollar basis). Net sales outside the limitation in Brazil, were adversely impacted by generally weak economic United States, conditions, political and economic uncertainties, including without limitation currency fluctuations, and competitive activities in certain markets. including without Cost of sales As a percentage of net sales, cost of sales was 34.0% for 1998 compared with 33.2% for 1997. The increase in cost of sales as a percentage of net sales for 1998 compared with 1997 is due to changes in product mix, the effect of weaker local currencies on the cost of imported purchases, the effect of lower net sales in the second half of 1998 and the inclusion of $2.7 of other costs incurred to exit certain product lines outside the United States in connection with the restructuring charge in the fourth quarter of 1998. These factors were partially offset by the benefits of more efficient global production and purchasing. 17 SG&A expenses As a percentage of net sales, SG&A expenses were 59.0% for 1998 compared with 57.1% for 1997. SG&A expenses other than advertising and consumer-directed promotion expenses, as a percentage of net sales, were 40.2% for 1998 compared with 39.3% for 1997. The increase in SG&A expenses other than advertising and consumer-directed promotion expenses as a percentage of net sales was due primarily to the effects of lower than expected sales. The Company’s advertising and consumer-directed promotion expenditures were incurred to support existing product lines, new product launches and increased distribution. Advertising and consumer-directed promotion expenses as a percentage of net sales were 18.8%, or $422.9, for 1998 compared to 17.8%, or $397.4, for 1997. Business consolidation costs and other, net In the fourth quarter of 1998 the Company committed to a restructuring plan to realign and reduce reconfigure certain personnel, exit excess leased real estate, manufacturing operations and exit certain product lines. As a result, the Company recognized a net charge of $42.9 consisting of $26.6 of employee severance and termination benefits for 720 sales, marketing, administrative, factory and distribution employees worldwide, $14.9 of costs to exit excess leased real estate primarily in the United States and $2.7 of other costs described above in cost of sales, partially offset by a gain of $1.3 for the sale of a factory outside the United States. realign and consolidate regional activities, In the third quarter of 1998 the Company recognized a gain of approximately $7.1 for the sale of the wigs and hairpieces portion of its business in the United States. In 1997 the Company incurred business consolidation costs of $20.6 in connection with the implementation of its business strategy to rationalize factory operations. These costs primarily included severance for 415 factory and administrative employees and other costs related to the rationalization of certain factory and warehouse operations worldwide. Such costs were partially offset by an approximately $12.7 settlement of a claim and related gains of approximately $4.3 for the sales of certain factory operations outside the United States. Operating income As a result of the foregoing, operating income decreased by $90.3, or 42.0%, to $124.6 for 1998 from $214.9 for 1997. Other expenses/income Interest expense was $137.9 for 1998 compared with $133.7 for 1997. The increase in interest expense for 1998 as compared with 1997 is due to higher average outstanding borrowings partially offset by lower interest rates. Foreign currency losses, net, were $4.6 for 1998 compared to $6.4 for 1997. The foreign currency losses for 1998 consisted primarily of losses in several markets in Latin America. The losses in 1997 consisted primarily of losses in several markets in Europe and the Far East. 18 Provision for income taxes The provision for income taxes was $5.0 and $9.3 for 1998 and 1997, respectively. The decrease was primarily attributable to lower taxable income outside the United States in 1998. Discontinued operations During 1998, the Company completed the disposition of its approximately 85% equity interest in CCI. In connection with such transaction, the Company recorded a loss on disposal of $47.7 during 1998. (Loss) income from discontinued operations was $(16.5) (excluding the $47.7 loss on disposal) and $0.7 for 1998 and 1997, respectively. The 1997 period includes a $6.0 non-recurring gain resulting from the merger of Prestige Fragrance & Cosmetics, Inc., then a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, with and into CCI on April 25, 1997, partially offset by related business consolidation costs of $4.0. The 1998 period includes the Company's share of a non-recurring charge of $10.5 taken by CCI primarily related to inventory and severance. Extraordinary items The extraordinary loss of $51.7 in 1998 resulted primarily from the write-off of deferred financing costs and payment of call premiums associated with the redemption of Products Corporation’s 9 3/8% Senior Notes due 2001 (the “Senior Notes”) and Products Corporation’s 10 1/2% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2003 (the “Senior Subordinated Notes”). The extraordinary loss in 1997 resulted from the write-off of deferred financing costs associated with the extinguishment of borrowings under the credit agreement in effect at that time prior to maturity with proceeds from the Credit Agreement, and costs of approximately $6.3 in connection with the redemption of Products Corporation’s 10 7/8% Sinking Fund Debentures due 2010 (the "Sinking Fund Debentures"). Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources Net cash (used for)/provided by operating activities was $(82.8), $(51.5) and $8.7 for 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively. The increase in net cash used for operating activities for 1999 compared with 1998 was the result of operating losses and increased use of cash for business consolidation costs during 1999, partially offset by changes in working capital. The increase in net cash used for operating activities for 1998 compared with cash provided in 1997 resulted primarily from lower operating income and increased cash used for business consolidation costs in 1998. Net cash used for investing activities was $40.7, $91.0 and $84.3 for 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively. Net cash used for investing activities in 1999 related principally to capital expenditures. Net cash used for investing activities for 1998 and 1997 includes cash paid in connection with acquisitions of businesses and capital expenditures, partially offset by the proceeds from the sale of the wigs and hairpieces portion of the Company's business in the United States in 1998 and from the sale of certain assets in 1998 and 1997. Net cash used for investing activities for 1999, 1998 and 1997 included capital expenditures of $42.3, $60.8 and $52.3, respectively, and in 1998 and 1997 $57.6 and $40.5, respectively, used for acquisitions. Net cash provided by financing activities was $118.5, $159.1 and $84.9 for 1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively. Net cash provided by financing activities for 1999 included cash drawn under the Credit Agreement, partially offset by repayments of borrowings under the Credit Agreement, redemption of the 9 1/2% Senior Notes due 1999 (the “1999 Notes”) and repayments under Products Corporation’s Japanese yen-denominated credit agreement (the “Yen Credit Agreement”). Net cash provided by financing activities for 1998 included proceeds from the issuance of Products Corporation’s 9% Senior Notes due 2006 (the “9% Notes”), Products Corporation’s 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2008 (the “8 5/8% Notes”) and Products Corporation’s 8 1/8% Senior Notes due 2006 (the “8 1/8% Notes”) and cash drawn under the Credit Agreement, partially offset by the payment of fees and expenses related to the issuance of the 9% Notes, the 8 5/8% Notes and the 8 1/8% Notes, the redemption of the Senior Subordinated Notes and the Senior Notes, and the repayment of borrowings under the Yen Credit Agreement. Net cash provided by financing activities for 1997 included cash drawn under the credit agreement in effect at that time and the Credit Agreement, partially offset by the repayment of borrowings under the credit agreement in effect at that time, the payment of fees and expenses related to entering into the Credit Agreement, the repayment of 19 borrowings under the Yen Credit Agreement and the redemption of Products Corporation’s Sinking Fund Debentures. During 1998 and 1997, net cash used by discontinued operations was $17.3 and $3.4, respectively. In May 1997, Products Corporation entered into a credit agreement (as subsequently amended, the “Credit Agreement”) with a syndicate of lenders, whose individual members change from time to time. Prior to the commitment reduction resulting from the sale of the professional products line (See “Subsequent Event” below) the Credit Agreement provided up to $723.0 and comprises five senior secured facilities: $198.0 in two term loan facilities (the “Term Loan Facilities”), a $300.0 multi-currency facility (the “Multi-Currency Facility”), a $175.0 revolving acquisition facility, which may also be used for general corporate purposes and which may be increased to $375.0 under certain circumstances with the consent of a majority of the lenders (the “Acquisition Facility”), and a $50.0 special standby letter of credit facility (the “Special LC Facility”). At December 31, 1999, the Company had approximately $198.0 outstanding under the Term Loan Facilities, $235.2 outstanding under the Multi-Currency Facility, $155.0 outstanding under the Acquisition Facility and $29.8 of issued but undrawn letters of credit under the Special LC Facility. The Credit Agreement contained financial covenants requiring Products Corporation to maintain minimum interest coverage and to limit its leverage ratio, among other things. As a result of the loss from continuing operations before taxes incurred by Products Corporation in the third quarter of 1999, the interest coverage and leverage ratios specified in the Credit Agreement were not achieved at September 30, 1999. The Credit Agreement was amended on November 10, 1999 to (i) eliminate the interest coverage ratio and leverage ratio covenants from the quarter ended September 30, 1999 through the year 2000 and to modify those covenants for the years 2001 and 2002; (ii) add a minimum EBITDA covenant for each quarter end during the year 2000; (iii) limit the amount that Products Corporation may spend for capital expenditures and investments including acquisitions; (iv) permit the sale of Products Corporation's worldwide professional products line and its non-core Latin American brands Colorama, Juvena, Bozzano and Plusbelle (the “Asset Sales”); (v) change the reduction of the aggregate commitment that is required upon consummation of any Asset Sale to an amount equal to 60% of the “Net Proceeds” (as defined in the Credit Agreement) from such Asset Sale as opposed to 100% of such Net Proceeds as provided under the Credit Agreement prior to the amendment; (vi) increase the “applicable margin” by ¾ of 1% and (vii) permit the amendment of the Yen Credit Agreement described below. In March 2000, 60% of the Net Proceeds from the sale of its worldwide professional products line was applied to reduce the aggregate commitment under the Credit Agreement to $572.7 (See “Subsequent Event” below). In March 2000, the Credit Agreement was amended to eliminate the default upon the acceleration of or certain payment defaults under indebtedness of REV Holdings in excess of $0.5. A subsidiary of Products Corporation was the borrower under the Yen Credit Agreement, which had a principal balance of approximately ¥1.0 billion as of December 31, 1999 (approximately $9.9 U.S. dollar equivalent as of December 31, 1999) after giving effect to the payment of approximately ¥539 million (approximately $4.6 U.S. dollar equivalent) in March 1999. In November 1999, the borrower under the Yen Credit Agreement executed an amendment to the Yen Credit Agreement to eliminate the amortization payment due in March 2000 and to provide that the final maturity date of the Yen Credit Agreement will be the earlier of (i) the closing date of the sale of Products Corporation's professional products line and (ii) December 31, 2000. In March 2000, the outstanding balance under the Yen Credit Agreement was repaid in full in accordance with its terms. In November 1998, Products Corporation issued and sold $250.0 principal amount of 9% Notes, of which $200.0 was used to temporarily reduce borrowings under the Credit Agreement in anticipation of the redemption referred to below. On June 1, 1999, Products Corporation redeemed the $200.0 principal amount of 1999 Notes with borrowings from the Credit Agreement. Products Corporation borrows funds from its affiliates from time to time to supplement its working capital borrowings at interest rates more favorable to Products Corporation than interest rates under the Credit Agreement. No such borrowings were outstanding as of December 31, 1999. The Company's principal sources of funds are expected to be cash flow generated from operations (before interest) and borrowings under the Credit Agreement, other existing working capital lines and renewals thereof, as well as proceeds from the sale of one or more of the Company’s non-core Latin American brands. The Credit Agreement, the 8 5/8% Notes, the 8 1/8% Notes and the 9% Notes contain certain provisions that by their terms limit Products Corporation’s and/or its subsidiaries' ability to, among other things, incur additional debt. The Company's 20 principal uses of funds are expected to be the payment of operating expenses, working capital and capital expenditure requirements, expenses in connection with the Company’s restructuring referred to above and debt service payments. As required under the Credit Agreement, the Company used 60% of the Net Proceeds (as defined in the Credit Agreement) from the sale of its worldwide professional products line to reduce the aggregate commitment under the Credit Agreement. Additionally, the Company expects that it will receive cash proceeds from the sale of one or more of its non-core Latin American brands and that it will use 60% of the Net Proceeds, to reduce the aggregate commitment under the Credit Agreement. The Company estimates that capital expenditures for 2000 will be approximately $25, including upgrades to the Company's management information systems. The Company estimates that cash payments related to the restructuring plans referred to in Note 4 and executive separation costs will be approximately $35 in 2000. Pursuant to a tax sharing agreement, Revlon, Inc. may be required to make tax sharing payments to Mafco Holdings Inc. as if Revlon, Inc. were filing separate income tax returns, except that no payments are required by Revlon, Inc. if and to the extent that Products Corporation is prohibited under the Credit Agreement from making tax sharing payments to Revlon, Inc. The Credit Agreement prohibits Products Corporation from making any tax sharing payments other than in respect of state and local income taxes. Revlon, Inc. currently anticipates that, as a result of net operating tax losses and prohibitions under the Credit Agreement, no cash federal tax payments or cash payments in lieu of federal taxes pursuant to the tax sharing agreement will be required for 2000. Products Corporation enters into forward foreign exchange contracts and option contracts from time to time to hedge certain cash flows denominated in foreign currencies. There were no forward foreign exchange or option contracts outstanding at December 31, 1999. Products Corporation had forward foreign exchange contracts denominated in various currencies of approximately $197.5 (U.S. dollar equivalent) outstanding at December 31, 1998 and option contracts of approximately $51.0 at December 31, 1998. Such contracts are entered into to hedge transactions predominantly occurring within twelve months. If Products Corporation had terminated these contracts on December 31, 1998 no material gain or loss would have been realized. The Company expects that cash flows from operations and funds from currently available credit facilities and renewals of short-term borrowings will be sufficient to enable the Company to meet its anticipated cash requirements during 2000 on a consolidated basis, including for debt service. However, there can be no assurance that the combination of cash flow from operations, funds from existing credit facilities and renewals of short-term borrowings will be sufficient to meet the Company's cash requirements on a consolidated basis. If the Company is unable to satisfy such cash requirements, the Company could be required to adopt one or more alternatives, such as reducing or delaying capital expenditures, restructuring indebtedness, selling other assets or operations, or seeking capital contributions or loans from affiliates of the Company or issuing additional shares of capital stock of Revlon, Inc. Products Corporation has had discussions with an affiliate that is prepared to provide financial support to Products Corporation of up to $40 on appropriate terms through December 31, 2000. Revlon, Inc., as a holding company, will be dependent on the earnings and cash flow of, and dividends and distributions from, Products Corporation to pay its expenses and to pay any cash dividend or distribution on the Class A Common Stock that may be authorized by the Board of Directors of Revlon, Inc. There can be no assurance that any of such actions could be effected, that they would enable the Company to continue to satisfy its capital requirements or that they would be permitted under the terms of the Company's various debt instruments then in effect. The terms of the Credit Agreement, the 8 5/8% Notes, the 8 1/8% Notes and the 9% Notes generally restrict Products Corporation from paying dividends or making distributions, except that Products Corporation is permitted to pay dividends and make distributions to Revlon, Inc., among other things, to enable Revlon, Inc. to pay expenses incidental to being a public holding company, including, among other things, professional fees such as legal and accounting, regulatory fees such as Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) filing fees and other miscellaneous expenses related to being a public holding company and to pay dividends or make distributions in certain circumstances to finance the purchase by Revlon, Inc. of its Class A Common Stock in connection with the delivery of such Class A Common Stock to grantees under the Revlon, Inc. Second Amended and Restated 1996 Stock Plan, provided that the aggregate amount of such dividends and distributions taken together with any purchases of Revlon, Inc. common stock on the open market to satisfy matching obligations under the excess savings plan may not exceed $6.0 per annum. Euro Conversion 21 As part of the European Economic and Monetary Union, a single currency (the “Euro”) will replace the national currencies of the principal European countries (other than the United Kingdom) in which the Company conducts business and manufacturing. The conversion rates between the Euro and the participating nations’ currencies were fixed as of January 1, 1999, with the participating national currencies to be removed from circulation between January 1, 2002 and June 30, 2002 and replaced by Euro notes and coinage. During the transition period from January 1, 1999 through December 31, 2001, public and private entities as well as individuals may pay for goods and services using checks, drafts, or wire transfers denominated either in the Euro or the participating country’s national currency. Under the regulations governing the transition to a single currency, there is a “no compulsion, no prohibition” rule which states that no one can be prevented from using the Euro after January 1, 2002 and no one is obliged to use the Euro before July 2002. In keeping with this rule, the Company expects to either continue using the national currencies or the Euro for invoicing or payments. Based upon the information currently available, the Company does not expect that the transition to the Euro will have a material adverse effect on the business or consolidated financial condition of the Company. Forward-Looking Statements This annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999 as well as other public documents of the Company contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. The Company’s actual results may differ materially from those discussed in such forward-looking statements. Such statements include, without limitation, the Company’s expectations and estimates as to being the most trusted supplier, the most innovative and the first to market with innovations, attracting and retaining the best people in the industry, building consistent global equities, addressing consumer needs, exceeding trade partners’ expectations, operating at benchmark levels of efficiency, becoming the most dynamic leader in global beauty and skin care, the introduction of new products and expansion into markets, future financial performance, the effect on sales of lower retailer inventory targets, the effect on sales of political and/or economic conditions and competitive activities in certain markets, the Company’s estimate of restructuring activities, costs and benefits, cash flow from operations, capital expenditures, the Company’s the Company’s qualitative and quantitative estimates as to market risk sensitive instruments, expectations about the effects of the transition to the Euro, the availability of funds from currently available credit facilities, renewals of short-term borrowings, and capital contributions or loans from affiliates or the sale of assets or operations or additional shares of Revlon, Inc. and the Company’s intent to pursue the sale of one or more of its non- core regional Latin American brands, that it will consummate such sales during the second quarter of 2000 and its expectation regarding the proceeds of such sales. Statements that are not historical facts, including statements about the Company’s beliefs and expectations, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements can be identified by, among other things, the use of forward-looking language, such as “believe,” “expects,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “seeks,” “plans,” “scheduled to,” “anticipates” or “intends” or the negative of those terms, or other variations of those terms or comparable language, or by discussions of strategy or intentions. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update them. A number of important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward- looking statement. In addition to factors that may be described in the Company’s filings with the Commission, including this filing, the following factors, among others, could cause the Company’s actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by the Company: (i) difficulties or delays in becoming the most trusted supplier, the most innovative and the first to market with innovations, attracting and retaining the best people in the industry, building consistent global equities, addressing consumer needs, exceeding trade partners’ expectations, operating at benchmark levels of efficiency, becoming the most dynamic leader in global beauty and skin care, and in developing and introducing new products or failure of customers to accept new product offerings; (ii) changes in consumer preferences, including reduced consumer demand for the Company’s color cosmetics and other current products; (iii) difficulties or delays in the Company’s continued expansion into the self-select distribution channel and into certain markets and development of new markets; (iv) unanticipated costs or difficulties or delays in completing projects associated with the Company’s strategy to improve operating efficiencies ; (v) the inability to secure capital contributions or loans from affiliates or sell assets or operations or additional shares of Revlon, Inc.; (vi) effects of and changes in political and/or economic conditions, including inflation and monetary conditions, and in trade, monetary, fiscal and tax policies in international markets, including but not limited to Brazil; (vii) actions by competitors, including business combinations, technological breakthroughs, new products offerings and marketing and promotional successes; (viii) combinations among significant customers or the loss, insolvency or failure to pay debts by a significant customer or customers; (ix) lower than expected sales as a result of difficulties or delays in achieving retailers’ inventory target levels; (x) difficulties, delays or unanticipated costs or 22 less than expected benefits resulting from the Company’s restructuring activities; (xi) interest rate or foreign exchange rate changes affecting the Company and its market sensitive financial instruments; (xii) difficulties, delays or unanticipated costs associated with the transition to the Euro; and (xiii) difficulties or delays in pursuing the sale of one or more of its non-core Latin American brands, the inability to consummate such sales during the second quarter of 2000 or to secure the expected level of proceeds from such sales. Effect of New Accounting Standards In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” which establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and for hedging activities. In June 1999, the FASB issued SFAS No. 137, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities - Deferral of the Effective Date of SFAS No. 133, an Amendment of SFAS No. 133,” which has delayed the required implementation of SFAS No. 133 such that the Company must adopt this new standard no later than January 1, 2001. The effect of adopting the new standard by the Company has not yet been determined. The Company plans to adopt the new standard on January 1, 2001. Inflation In general, costs are affected by inflation and the effects of inflation may be experienced by the Company in future periods. Management believes, however, that such effects have not been material to the Company during the past three years in the United States or foreign non-hyperinflationary countries. The Company operates in certain countries around the world, such as Brazil, Venezuela and Mexico, that have experienced hyperinflation in the past three years. The Company's operations in Brazil were accounted for as operating in a hyperinflationary economy until June 30, 1997. Effective July 1, 1997, Brazil was considered a non-hyperinflationary economy. The impact of accounting for Brazil as a non-hyperinflationary economy was not material to the Company's operating results. Effective January 1997, Mexico was considered a hyperinflationary economy for accounting purposes. Effective January 1, 1999, Mexico was considered a non-hyperinflationary economy. In hyperinflationary foreign countries, the Company attempts to mitigate the effects of inflation by increasing prices in line with inflation, where possible, and efficiently managing its working capital levels. Subsequent Event On March 30, 2000, the Company completed the disposition of its worldwide professional products line, including professional hair care for use in and resale by professional salons, ethnic hair and personal care products, Natural Honey skin care and certain regional toiletries brands, for $315 in cash, before adjustments, plus $10 in purchase price payable in the future, contingent upon the purchasers' achievement of certain rates of return on their investment. The disposition involved the sale of certain of the Company's subsidiaries throughout the world devoted to the professional products line, as well as assets dedicated exclusively or primarily to the lines being disposed. The worldwide professional products line was purchased by a company formed by CVC Capital Partners, the Colomer family and other investors, led by Carlos Colomer, a former manager of the line that was sold, following arms’- length negotiation of the terms of the purchase agreement therefor, including the determination of the amount of the consideration. The following unaudited summary pro forma financial information gives effect to the sale of the worldwide professional products line as of January 1, 1999 in the case of the pro forma statement of operations data and as of December 31, 1999 in the case of the pro forma balance sheet data. The pro forma information includes certain adjustments, such as reduced interest expense and a reduction in long-term debt as a result of the repayment of debt with $296.3 of the net proceeds from the disposition. The unaudited pro forma statement of operations data exclude the gain on the sale of the professional products line and eliminate costs incurred to date in connection with the sale since the gain and associated costs are non-recurring. The unaudited summary pro forma financial information is not necessarily indicative of the results of operations of the Company had the sale occurred at January 1, 1999, or financial position at December 31, 1999 had the sale occurred at that date, nor is it necessarily indicative of future results. 23 REVLON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS (dollars in millions, except per share data) Historical Year Ended December 31, 1999 Results of Professional Products Line Net sales........................................................................... Cost of sales..................................................................... Gross profit................................................................. Selling, general and administrative expenses................... Business consolidation costs and other, net...................... $ 1,861.3 $ 686.1 1,175.2 1,347.6 40.2 (320.1) $ (118.7) (201.4) (168.9) (0.9) Operating loss ............................................................ (212.6) (31.6) Other expenses (income): Interest expense.......................................................... Other, net.................................................................... Other expenses, net.............................................. 147.9 1.9 149.8 (Loss) income from operations before income taxes....... (362.4) Provision for income taxes............................................... 9.1 (0.7) 1.3 0.6 (32.2) (2.6) Year Ended December 31, 1999 1,541.2 567.4 973.8 1,178.7 39.3 (244.2) 120.3 1.2 121.5 Adjustments $ (26.9) (2.0) (28.9) 28.9 (365.7) 6.5 (Loss) income from operations......................................... $ (371.5) $ (29.6) $ 28.9 $ (372.2) Basic and diluted (loss) income per common share: (Loss) income from operations.................................. $ (7.25) $ (7.26) Weighted average number of common shares outstanding: Basic and diluted....................................................... 51,240,225 51,240,225 24 REVLON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET (dollars in millions) Current assets: ASSETS Cash and cash equivalents........................................................... Trade receivables, net.................................................................. Inventories................................................................................... Prepaid expenses and other......................................................... Total current assets.............................................................. Property, plant and equipment, net..................................................... Other assets........................................................................................ Intangible assets, net.......................................................................... Total assets.......................................................................... LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIENCY Total current liabilities....................................................................... Long-term debt - third parties............................................................ Long-term debt - affiliates.................................................................. Other long-term liabilities.................................................................. Total stockholders' deficiency............................................................ Total liabilities and stockholders' deficiency....................... $ $ $ $ Professional December 31, Products December 31, 1999 1999 Line Adjustments Pro Forma 25.4 $ 332.6 278.3 51.3 687.6 336.4 177.5 356.8 1,558.3 $ (3.0) (78.4) (49.6) 6.7 (124.3) (41.5) (3.3) (111.4) (280.5) 597.3 $ (49.6) $ $ $ 1,737.8 24.1 214.0 (1,014.9) 1,558.3 $ (0.3) $ (296.3) (230.6) (280.5) $ 296.3 - $ 22.4 254.2 228.7 58.0 563.3 294.9 174.2 245.4 1,277.8 547.7 1,441.2 24.1 214.0 (949.2) 1,277.8 Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk Interest Rate Sensitivity The Company has exposure to changing interest rates, primarily in the United States. The Company’s policy is to manage interest rate risk through the use of a combination of fixed and floating rate debt. The Company from time to time makes use of derivative financial instruments to adjust its fixed and floating rate ratio. The table below provides information about the Company’s indebtedness that is sensitive to changes in interest rates. The table presents cash flows with respect to principal on indebtedness and related weighted average interest rates by expected maturity dates. Weighted average variable rates are based on implied forward rates in the yield curve at December 31, 1999. The information is presented in U.S. dollar equivalents, which is the Company’s reporting currency. Exchange Rate Sensitivity The Company manufactures and sells its products in a number of countries throughout the world and, as a In addition, a portion of the Company’s result, is exposed to movements in foreign currency exchange rates. borrowings are denominated in foreign currencies, which are also subject to market risk associated with exchange rate movement. The Company from time to time hedges major net foreign currency cash exposures generally through foreign exchange forward and option contracts. The contracts are entered into with major financial institutions to minimize counterparty risk. These contracts generally have a duration of less than twelve months and In addition, the Company enters into foreign currency swaps to hedge are primarily against the U.S. dollar. intercompany financing transactions. The forward foreign exchange and option contracts entered into during 1999 expired by December 31, 1999. 25 The Company does not hold or issue financial instruments for trading purposes. Debt 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Thereafter Total (US dollar equivalent in millions) Expected maturity date for year ended December 31, Fair Value Dec. 31, 1999 Short-term variable rate (various currencies). Average interest rate …………………… $37.6 8.3% Long-term fixed rate ($US) Average interest rate …………………… Long-term variable rate ($US) Average interest rate …………………… Long-term variable rate (various currencies)… 10.2 3.1% Average interest rate …………………… Total debt $ 67.2 9.5% 0.3 7.3% $405.8 9.7% 115.2 8.0% $0.1 7.3% $ 1,149.2 8.6% $ 37.6 $ 37.6 1,149.2 705.0 473.0 473.0 125.8 125.8 $ 1,785.6 $ 1,341.4 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Reference is made to the Index on page F-1 of the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company and the Notes thereto contained herein. Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure Not applicable. 26 Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant PART III The following table sets forth certain information concerning the Directors and executive officers of the Company. Each Director holds office until his successor is duly elected and qualified or until his resignation or removal, if earlier. Name Position Ronald O. Perelman Chairman of the Board, Chairman of the Executive Committee of the Board and Director Jeffrey M. Nugent Frank J. Gehrmann Wade H. Nichols III Donald G. Drapkin Meyer Feldberg Howard Gittis Morton L. Janklow Vernon E. Jordan Edward J. Landau Jerry W. Levin Linda Gosden Robinson Terry Semel Martha Stewart President, Chief Executive Officer and Director Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer Director Director Director Director Director Director Director Director Director Director The name, age (as of March 8, 2000), principal occupation for the last five years and selected biographical information for each of the Directors and executive officers of the Company are set forth below. Mr. Perelman (57) has been Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company and of the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary Products Corporation since June 1998, Chairman of the Executive Committee of the Board of the Company and of Products Corporation since November 1995, and a Director of the Company and of Products Corporation since their respective formations in 1992. Mr. Perelman was Chairman of the Board of the Company and of Products Corporation from their respective formations in 1992 until November 1995. Mr. Perelman has been Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Mafco Holdings Inc. (“Mafco Holdings” and, collectively with MacAndrews Holdings, “MacAndrews & Forbes”) and MacAndrews Holdings and various of its affiliates since 1980. Mr. Perelman is also Chairman of the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors of M&F Worldwide Corp. (“M&F Worldwide”) and is Chairman of the Board of Directors of Panavision Inc. (“Panavision”). Mr. Perelman is also a Director of the following corporations which file reports pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”): Golden State Bancorp Inc. (“Golden State”), Golden State Holdings Inc. (“Golden State Holdings”), M&F Worldwide, Panavision and REV Holdings. (On December 27, 1996, Marvel Entertainment Group, Inc. (“Marvel”), Marvel Holdings Inc. (“Marvel Holdings”), Marvel (Parent) Holdings Inc. 27 (“Marvel Parent”) and Marvel III Holdings Inc. (“Marvel III”), of which Mr. Perelman was a Director on such date, filed voluntary petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code.) Mr. Nugent (53) has been President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and of Products Corporation since December 5, 1999. He has been a Director of the Company and of Products Corporation since February 14, 2000. He had been Worldwide President and Chief Executive Officer of Neutrogena Corporation from January 1995 until December 5, 1999. Prior to that, Mr. Nugent held various senior executive positions at Johnson & Johnson. Mr. Gehrmann (45) was elected as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company and of Products Corporation in January 1998. From January 1997 until January 1998 he had been Vice President of the Company and of Products Corporation. Prior to January 1997 he served in various appointed senior executive positions for the Company and for Products Corporation, including Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Products Corporation’s Operating Groups from August 1996 to January 1998, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Products Corporation’s Worldwide Consumer Products business from January 1995 to August 1996, and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Products Corporation’s Revlon North America unit from September 1993 to January 1994. From 1983 through September 1993, Mr. Gehrmann held positions of increasing responsibility in the financial organizations of Mennen Corporation and the Colgate-Palmolive Company, which acquired Mennen Corporation in 1992. Prior to 1983, Mr. Gehrmann served as a certified public accountant at the international auditing firm of Ernst & Young. Mr. Nichols (57) has been Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer of the Company and of Products Corporation since January 1, 2000. He was Executive Vice President and General Counsel of the Company and of Products Corporation from January 1998 until December 31, 1999 and served as Senior Vice President and General Counsel of the Company and Products Corporation from their respective formations in 1992 until January 1998. Mr. Drapkin (52) has been a Director of the Company and of Products Corporation since their respective formations in 1992. He has been Vice Chairman of the Board of MacAndrews & Forbes and various of its affiliates since 1987. Mr. Drapkin was a partner in the law firm of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom for more than five years prior to 1987. Mr. Drapkin is also a Director of the following corporations which file reports pursuant to the Exchange Act: Algos Pharmaceutical Corporation, Anthracite Capital, Inc., BlackRock Asset Investors, The Molson Companies Limited, Nexell Therapeutics Inc., Playboy Enterprises, Inc., Warnaco Group, Inc. and Weider Nutrition International, Inc. (On December 27, 1996, Marvel, Marvel Holdings, Marvel Parent and Marvel III, of which Mr. Drapkin was a Director on such date, filed voluntary petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code.) Professor Feldberg (57) has been a Director of the Company since February 1997. Professor Feldberg has been the Dean of Columbia Business School, New York City, for more than the past five years. Professor Feldberg is also a Director of the following corporations which file reports pursuant to the Exchange Act: Federated Department Stores, Inc., PRIMEDIA Inc. and Paine Webber Group, Inc. (28 directorships within such fund complex). Mr. Gittis (66) has been a Director of the Company and of Products Corporation since their respective formations in 1992. He has been Vice Chairman of the Board of MacAndrews & Forbes and various of its affiliates since 1985. Mr. Gittis is also a Director of the following corporations which file reports pursuant to the Exchange Act: Golden State, Golden State Holdings, Jones Apparel Group, Inc., Loral Space & Communications Ltd., M&F Worldwide, Panavision, REV Holdings and Sunbeam Corporation. Mr. Janklow (69) has been a Director of the Company since July 1997. He has been Of Counsel to Janklow, Newborn & Ashley and Senior Partner of Janklow & Nesbit Associates, a New York City-based literary agency, since 1989 and Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Morton L. Janklow Associates, Inc., New York City since 1977. Mr. Janklow is also trustee of the Managed Accounts Services Portfolio Trust/Pace. Mr. Jordan (64) has been a Director of the Company since June 1996. Mr. Jordan has been a Managing Director of Lazard Freres & Co. LLC since January 2000. Since January 2000, Mr. Jordan has been Of Counsel at the Washington, D.C. law firm of Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, LLP, and was a Senior Partner of such firm 28 for more than five years prior thereto. He is also a Director of the following corporations which file reports pursuant to the Exchange Act: American Express Company, Callaway Golf Corporation, AMFM Inc., Dow Jones & Company, Inc., J.C. Penney Company, Inc., Ryder System, Inc., Sara Lee Corporation, Union Carbide Corporation and Xerox Corporation. He is also a trustee of Howard University. Mr. Landau (70) has been a Director of the Company since June 1996. Mr. Landau has been Of Counsel at the law firm of Wolf, Block, Schorr and Solis-Cohen LLP since February 1998, and was a Senior Partner of Lowenthal, Landau, Fischer & Bring, P.C., the predecessor to such firm, for more than five years prior to that date. Mr. Landau is also a Director of Offitbank Investment Fund, Inc., which files reports pursuant to the Exchange Act. Mr. Levin (55) was Chairman of the Board of the Company and of Products Corporation from November 1995 to June 1998 and has been a Director of the Company since its formation in 1992 and a Director of Products Corporation from its formation in 1992 to November 1998. Mr. Levin has been President and Chief Executive Officer and a Director of Sunbeam Corporation (“Sunbeam”) since June 1998 and was elected Chairman of the Sunbeam Board in March 1999. He has served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of The Coleman Company, Inc. (“Coleman”) since August 1998. Mr. Levin was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Company from 1997 to March 1998 and was Chairman of the Board and a Director of The Cosmetic Center, Inc. from April 1997 until December 1998. Mr. Levin was Chief Executive Officer of the Company and of Products Corporation from their respective formations in 1992 until 1997 and President of the Company and of Products Corporation from their respective formations in 1992 until November 1995. Mr. Levin has been Executive Vice President of MacAndrews Holdings since March 1989. For 15 years prior to joining MacAndrews Holdings, he held various senior executive positions with The Pillsbury Company. Mr. Levin is a Director of the following corporations which file reports pursuant to the Exchange Act: Ecolab, Inc., Sunbeam Corporation and U.S. Bancorp, Inc. Ms. Robinson (47) has been a Director of the Company since June 1996. Ms. Robinson has been Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Robinson Lerer & Montgomery, LLC, a New York City strategic communications consulting firm, since May 1996. For more than five years prior thereto she was Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Robinson Lerer Sawyer Miller Group, or its predecessors. Ms. Robinson is a trustee of Mt. Sinai Medical Center and Health System. Mr. Semel (57) has been a Director of the Company since June 1996. Mr. Semel has been Chairman of Windsor Media, Inc., Los Angeles, a diversified media company, since October 1999. He was Chairman of the Board and Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Warner Bros. Division of Time Warner Entertainment LP (“Warner Brothers”), Los Angeles, from March 1994 until October 1999 and of Warner Music Group, Los Angeles, from November 1995 until October 1999. For more than ten years prior to that he was President of Warner Brothers or its predecessor, Warner Bros. Inc. Mr. Semel is also a Director of Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation, which files reports pursuant to the Exchange Act. Ms. Stewart (58) has been a Director of the Company since June 1996. Ms. Stewart is the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc., New York City (formerly Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, LLC, New York City). She has been an author, founder of the magazine Martha Stewart Living, creator of a syndicated television series, a syndicated newspaper column and a catalog company, and a lifestyle consultant and lecturer for more than the past five years. Ms. Stewart is a Director of Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc., which files reports pursuant to the Exchange Act. 29 Board of Directors and Its Committees The Board of Directors has an Executive Committee, an Audit Committee and a Compensation and Stock Plan Committee (the “Compensation Committee”). The Executive Committee consists of Messrs. Perelman, Gittis and Nugent. The Executive Committee may exercise all of the powers and authority of the Board, except as otherwise provided under the Delaware General Corporation Law. The Executive Committee also serves as the Company’s nominating committee for Board membership. The Audit Committee, consisting of Mr. Landau, Professor Feldberg and Ms. Robinson, makes recommendations to the Board of Directors regarding the engagement of the Company’s independent auditors for ratification by the Company’s stockholders, reviews the plan, scope and results of the audit, and reviews with the auditors and management the Company’s policies and procedures with respect to internal accounting and financial controls, changes in accounting policy and the scope of the non-audit services which may be performed by the Company’s independent auditors, among other things. The Compensation Committee, currently consisting of Messrs. Gittis, Drapkin and Semel and Mr. Morton Janklow, who will not be standing for re-election as a director at the Annual Meeting, makes recommendations to the Board of Directors regarding compensation and incentive arrangements (including performance-based arrangements) for the Chief Executive Officer, other executive officers, officers and other key managerial employees of the Company. The Compensation Committee also considers and recommends awards pursuant to the Revlon, Inc. Second Amended and Restated 1996 Stock Plan, which was amended and restated as of December 17, 1996 and as of February 12, 1999 (the “Stock Plan”), and administers such plan. During 1999, the Board of Directors held six meetings and acted once by unanimous written consent, the Executive Committee acted four times by unanimous written consent, the Audit Committee held five meetings and the Compensation Committee held one meeting and acted nine times by unanimous written consent. During 1999, all Directors (other than Mr. Semel and Ms. Stewart) attended 75% or more of the meetings of the Board of Directors and of the Committees of which they were members. Compensation of Directors Directors who currently are not receiving compensation as officers or employees of the Company or any of its affiliates are paid an annual retainer fee of $25,000, payable in quarterly installments, and a fee of $1,000 for each meeting of the Board of Directors or any committee thereof they attend. 30 Item 11. Executive Compensation The following table sets forth information for the years indicated concerning the compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to the persons who served as Chief Executive Officer of the Company during 1999 and the four most highly paid executive officers, other than the Chief Executive Officers, who served as executive officers of the Company during 1999 (collectively, the “Named Executive Officers”), for services rendered in all capacities to the Company and its subsidiaries during such periods. Summary Compensation Table Annual Compensation (a) Long-Term Compensation Awards Name and Principal Position Year Salary ($) Bonus ($) Other Annual Compensation ($) Securities Underlying Options All Other Compensation ($) Jeffrey M. Nugent President and Chief Executive Officer (b) George Fellows Former President and Chief Executive Officer (c) M. Katherine Dwyer Former Senior Vice President (d) Irwin Engelman Former Vice Chairman and Chief Administrative Officer (e) Frank J. Gehrmann Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (f) Wade H. Nichols III Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer (g) 1999 160,256 0 36,382 300,000 38,743 1999 1998 1997 1999 1998 1997 1999 1,806,923 1,800,000 1,250,000 953,653 875,000 500,000 700,000 1,685,000 115,000 1,250,000 755,000 420,000 800,000 0 1999 1998 494,038 427,500 370,500 80,200 1999 1998 1997 593,558 555,000 525,000 216,450 83,600 274,000 107,848 88,549 22,191 13,940 9,651 5,948 0 3,089 3,343 17,964 19,457 24,215 170,000 170,000 170,000 75,000 75,000 125,000 75,000 65,000 30,000 40,000 40,000 30,000 1,849,051 33,181 30,917 496,304 21,585 18,377 540,000 14,244 17,297 37,802 33,195 23,089 (a) The amounts shown in Annual Compensation for 1999, 1998 and 1997 reflect salary, bonus and other annual compensation (including perquisites and other personal benefits valued in excess of $50,000) and amounts reimbursed for payment of taxes awarded to, earned by or paid to the persons listed for services rendered to the Company and its subsidiaries. The Company has a bonus plan (the “Executive Bonus Plan”) in which executives participate (including Mr. Nugent and Mr. Nichols (see “--Employment Agreements and Termination of Employment Arrangements”)). The Executive Bonus Plan provides for payment of cash compensation upon the achievement of predetermined corporate and/or business unit and individual performance goals during the calendar year established pursuant to the Executive Bonus Plan or by the Compensation Committee. Mr. Gehrmann's compensation is reported for 1999 and 1998 only because he did not serve as an executive officer of the Company prior to 1998. Each of Messrs. Engelman's and Nugent's compensation is reported for 1999 only because neither served as a paid executive officer of the Company prior to 1999. (b) Mr. Nugent served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company effective December 5, 1999. The amount shown for Mr. Nugent under Salary for 1999 is comprised of $76,923 in salary and $83,333 earned by Mr. 31 Nugent for consulting services provided by Mr. Nugent to the Company. Mr. Nugent did not receive a Bonus for 1999. The amount shown for Mr. Nugent under Other Annual Compensation for 1999 includes a payment of $36,382 in respect of gross ups for taxes on imputed income arising out of relocation expenses paid or reimbursed by the Company in 1999. The amount shown under All Other Compensation for 1999 reflects $38,743 in Company- paid relocation expenses. (c) Mr. Fellows served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company during 1999 until his resignation effective November 1999. The amount shown for Mr. Fellows under Bonus for 1999 is comprised of a special restructuring bonus of $1,685,000 paid to Mr. Fellows for 1999 upon achievement of business objectives set by the Compensation Committee. The amount shown for Mr. Fellows under Other Annual Compensation for 1999 includes $18,020 in respect of personal use of a Company-provided automobile and $17,145 in respect of Company-paid tax preparation expenses and payments in respect of gross ups for taxes on imputed income arising out of personal use of a Company-provided automobile and Company-provided air travel and for taxes on imputed income arising out of premiums paid or reimbursed by the Company in respect of life insurance. The amount shown under All Other Compensation for 1999 reflects $29,251 in respect of life insurance premiums, $4,800 in respect of matching contributions under the Revlon Employees' Savings, Profit Sharing and Investment Plan (the “401(k) Plan”), $15,000 in respect of matching contributions under the Revlon Excess Savings Plan for Key Employees (the “Excess Plan”) and $1,800,000 payable pursuant to Mr. Fellows' separation agreement. The amount shown for Mr. Fellows under Other Annual Compensation for 1998 includes $18,020 in respect of personal use of a Company-provided automobile and $15,445 in respect of membership fees and related expenses for personal use of a health and country club and payments in respect of gross ups for taxes on imputed income arising out of personal use of a Company-provided automobile and Company-provided air travel and for taxes on imputed income arising out of premiums paid or reimbursed by the Company in respect of life insurance. The amount shown under All Other Compensation for 1998 reflects $13,381 in respect of life insurance premiums, $4,800 in respect of matching contributions under the 401(k) Plan and $15,000 in respect of matching contributions under the Excess Plan. The amounts shown under Other Annual Compensation for 1997 reflect payments in respect of gross ups for taxes on imputed income arising out of personal use of a Company-provided automobile and for taxes on imputed income arising out of premiums paid or reimbursed by the Company in respect of life insurance. The amount shown under All Other Compensation for 1997 reflects $11,117 in respect of life insurance premiums, $4,800 in respect of matching contributions under the 401(k) Plan and $15,000 in respect of matching contributions under the Excess Plan. in effect at (d) Ms. Dwyer served as Senior Vice President of the Company during 1999 and resigned effective January 3, 2000. The amount shown for Ms. Dwyer under Bonus for 1999 is comprised of a special restructuring bonus of $755,000 paid to Ms. Dwyer for 1999 upon achievement of business objectives set by the Compensation Committee. The amounts shown under Bonus for 1998 and 1997 include an additional payment of $300,000 in each year pursuant to her employment agreement the time. The amounts shown for Ms. Dwyer under Other Annual Compensation for 1999, 1998 and 1997 reflect payments in respect of gross ups for taxes on imputed income arising out of personal use of a Company-provided automobile and payments in respect of gross ups for taxes on imputed income arising out of premiums paid or reimbursed by the Company in respect of life insurance. The amount shown under All Other Compensation for 1999 reflects $1,810 in respect of life insurance premiums, $4,800 in respect of matching contributions under the 401(k) Plan, $14,694 in respect of matching contributions under the Excess Plan and $475,000 payable pursuant to Ms. Dwyer's separation agreement. The amount shown under All Other Compensation for 1998 reflects $1,785 in respect of life insurance premiums, $4,800 in respect of matching contributions under the 401(k) Plan and $15,000 in respect of matching contributions under the Excess Plan. The amount shown under All Other Compensation for 1997 reflects $2,720 in respect of life insurance premiums, $4,800 in respect of matching contributions under the 401(k) Plan and $10,857 in respect of matching contributions under the Excess Plan. (e) Mr. Engelman became an executive officer of the Company in November 1998 and served as Vice Chairman and Chief Administrative Officer of the Company during 1999 until his resignation effective December 31, 1999. The amount shown for Mr. Engelman under All Other Compensation for 1999 reflects $15,000 in respect of matching contributions under the Excess Plan and $525,000 payable pursuant to Mr. Engelman's separation agreement. (f) Mr. Gehrmann became an executive officer of the Company in January 1998. The amount shown for Mr. Gehrmann under Bonus for 1999 reflects the bonus amount payable to Mr. Gehrmann pursuant to his employment 32 agreement. The amounts shown for Mr. Gehrmann under Other Annual Compensation for 1999 and 1998 reflects payments in respect of gross ups for taxes on imputed income arising out of personal use of a Company-provided automobile. The amount shown under All Other Compensation for 1999 reflects $4,800 in respect of matching contributions under the 401(k) Plan and $9,444 in respect of matching contributions under the Excess Plan. The amount shown under All Other Compensation for 1998 reflects $4,800 in respect of matching contributions under the 401(k) Plan and $12,497 in respect of matching contributions under the Excess Plan. (g) The amount shown for Mr. Nichols under Bonus for 1999 reflects the amount payable to Mr. Nichols under the Executive Bonus Plan, taking into account the guarantee by the Company of a minimum of 50% of targeted awards for 1999 (see “—Employment Agreements and Termination of Employment Arrangements”). The amount shown for Mr. Nichols under Bonus for 1997 were deferred pursuant to the Revlon Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Deferred Compensation Plan”) pursuant to which eligible executive employees who participate in the Executive Bonus Plan may elect to defer all or a portion of the bonus otherwise payable in respect of a calendar year. The amounts shown under Other Annual Compensation for 1999, 1998 and 1997 reflect payments in respect of gross ups for taxes on imputed income arising out of personal use of a Company-provided automobile and payments for taxes on imputed income arising out of premiums paid or reimbursed by the Company in respect of life insurance. The amount shown for Mr. Nichols under All Other Compensation for 1999 reflects $9,377 in respect of life insurance premiums, $4,800 in respect of matching contributions under the 401(k) Plan, $11,781 in respect of matching contributions under the Excess Plan and $11,844 in respect of above market earnings on compensation deferred under the Deferred Compensation Plan for each year in which compensation was deferred that were earned but not paid or payable during 1999. The amount shown under All Other Compensation for 1998 reflects $9,990 in respect of life insurance premiums, $4,800 in respect of matching contributions under the 401(k) Plan, $10,463 in respect of matching contributions under the Excess Plan and $7,942 in respect of above-market earnings on compensation deferred under the Deferred Compensation Plan for each year in which compensation was deferred that were earned but not paid or payable during 1998. The amount shown under All Other Compensation for 1997 reflects $4,252 in respect of life insurance premiums, $4,800 in respect of matching contributions under the 401(k) Plan, $11,606 in respect of matching contributions under the Excess Plan and $2,431 in respect of above-market earnings on compensation deferred under the Deferred Compensation Plan for each year in which compensation was deferred that were earned but not paid or payable during 1997. 33 OPTION GRANTS IN THE LAST FISCAL YEAR During 1999, the following grants of stock options were made pursuant to the Stock Plan to the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table: Individual Grants Number of Securities Underlying Options Granted (#) Percent of Total Options Granted to Employees in Fiscal Year Exercise or Base Price ($/SH) 300,000 170,000 75,000 75,000 40,000 25,000 40,000 12% 7% 3% 3% 3% 2% 9.31 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 24.13 15.00 Expiration Date 12/5/09 12/31/02 1/3/00 2/12/01 2/12/09 5/17/09 2/12/09 Name Jeffrey M. Nugent George Fellows M. Katherine Dwyer Irwin Engelman Frank J. Gehrmann Wade H. Nichols III Grant Date Value (a) Grant Date Present Value $ 1,968,360 1,547,340 682,650 682,650 364,080 407,784 364,080 The grants made during 1999 under the Stock Plan to Messrs. Fellows, Engelman and Nichols and Ms. Dwyer were made on February 12, 1999, vested fully on the first anniversary of the grant date, and have an exercise price equal to the NYSE closing price per share of the Class A Common Stock on the grant date, as indicated in the table above. The options granted to Mr. Nichols in 1999 consist of non-qualified options having a term of 10 years. The options granted to Messrs. Fellows and Engelman in 1999 consist of non-qualified options that expire on December 31, 2002 and February 12, 2001, respectively, and the options granted to Ms. Dwyer in 1999 consist of non-qualified options that expired on January 3, 2000, pursuant to her termination agreement. (See “-Employment Agreements and Termination of Employment Arrangements”). The grants made during 1999 under the Stock Plan to Mr. Gehrmann were made on February 12, 1999 (with respect to an option to purchase 40,000 shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock that vested in full on the first anniversary of the grant date) and May 17, 1999 (with respect to an option to purchase 25,000 shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock that vests 25% each year beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date and will become 100% vested on the fourth anniversary of the grant date) and consist of non-qualified options having a term of 10 years with an exercise price equal to the NYSE closing price per share of the Class A Common Stock on the applicable grant date, as indicated in the table above. The grant made during 1999 under the Stock Plan to Mr. Nugent was made on December 5, 1999, has an exercise price equal to the NYSE closing price per share of the Class A Common Stock on the first business day after the grant date, as indicated in the table above, and will not vest as to any portion until the third anniversary of the date of grant and will thereupon become 100% vested, except that upon termination of employment by Mr. Nugent for “good reason” or by the Company other than for “cause” under his employment agreement, such options will vest with respect to 33 1/3% of the shares subject thereto if such termination is on or after the first and before the second anniversaries of such grant and with respect to 66 2/3% if such termination is on or after the second and before the third anniversaries of such grant. During 1999, the Company also granted an option to purchase 300,000 shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock pursuant to the Stock Plan to Mr. Perelman, the Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company. The option vested in full on the grant date and has an exercise price of $15.00, the NYSE closing price per share of the Class A Common Stock on February 12, 1999, the date of the grant. (a) Grant Date Present Values were calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The model as applied used the grant dates of February 12, 1999 and May 17, 1999 with respect to the options granted on such dates and used the grant date of December 6, 1999 (the first business day after the date of grant) with respect to the option granted to Mr. Nugent on December 5, 1999. Stock option models require a prediction about the future movement of stock price. The following assumptions were made for purposes of calculating Grant Date Present 34 Values: (i) a risk-free rate of return of 5.18% with respect to the options granted on February 12, 1999, 6.24% with respect to the options granted on May 17, 1999, and 5.75% with respect to the option granted to Mr. Nugent on December 5, 1999, which were the rates as of the applicable grant dates for the U.S. Treasury Zero Coupon Bond issues with a remaining term similar to the expected term of the options; (ii) stock price volatility of 68% based upon the volatility of the Company’s stock price; (iii) a constant dividend rate of zero percent and (iv) that the options normally would be exercised on the final day of their seventh year after grant. No adjustments to the theoretical value were made to reflect the waiting period, if any, prior to vesting of the stock options or the transferability (or restrictions related thereto) of the stock options. The real value of the options in the table depends upon the actual performance of the Company's stock during the applicable period and upon when they are exercised. AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR AND FISCAL YEAR-END OPTION VALUES The following chart shows the number of stock options exercised during 1999 and the 1999 year-end value of the stock options held by the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table: Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) Value Realized ($) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Name Jeffrey M. Nugent George Fellows M. Katherine Dwyer Irwin Engelman Frank J. Gehrmann Wade H. Nichols III Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options at Fiscal Year-End (#) Exercisable/Unexercisable Value of Unexercised In-The- Money Options at Fiscal Year-End Exercisable/ Unexercisable (a)($) 0/300,000 205,000/255,000(b) 126,250/193,750(c) 18,750/131,250 21,000/118,000 55,000/85,000 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 (a) The market value of the underlying shares of Class A Common Stock at year end, calculated using $7 15/16, the December 31, 1999 NYSE closing price per share of Class A Common Stock, was less than the exercise price of all stock options listed in the table. The actual value, if any, an executive may realize upon exercise of a stock option depends upon the amount by which the market price of shares of Class A Common Stock exceeds the exercise price per share when the stock options are exercised. (b) Pursuant to Mr. Fellows' separation agreement effective November 1999, Mr. Fellows' 1998 option grant was cancelled; accordingly, the 1998 grant is not included in the option information in the above table for Mr. Fellows at fiscal year end. (c) The option information for Ms. Dwyer in the table above is correct as of December 31, 1999. Pursuant to Ms. Dwyer's separation agreement, effective January 3, 2000 unvested options were cancelled; accordingly, as of January 3, 2000 the number of securities underlying Ms. Dwyer's total outstanding options, all of which are exercisable, was 126,250. 35 Employment Agreements and Termination of Employment Arrangements Each of Messrs. Nugent, Gehrmann and Nichols has a current executive employment agreement with the Company's wholly owned subsidiary, Products Corporation. Mr. Nugent's employment agreement, effective December 5, 1999, provides that he will serve as President and Chief Executive Officer at a base salary of not less than $1,000,000 for 1999 and 2000, not less than $1,150,000 for 2001 and not less than $1,300,000 for 2002, and that management recommend to the Compensation Committee that he be granted options to purchase 300,000 shares of Class A Common Stock on December 5, 1999 (which grant was made) and 100,000 shares of Class A Common Stock on each of December 5, 2000 and 2001. At any time on or after December 31, 2002, Products Corporation may terminate the term of Mr. Nugent's agreement by 24 months' prior notice of non-renewal. During any such period after notice of non-renewal Mr. Nugent would be deemed an employee at will and would be eligible for severance under the Executive Severance Policy. Mr. Gehrmann entered into an employment agreement with Products Corporation dated as of May 10, 1999, which provides that he will serve as Chief Financial Officer at a base salary of not less than $500,000 and that management will recommend to the Compensation Committee that he be granted options to purchase 40,000 shares of Class A Common Stock each year during the term of the agreement (unless and until a “triggering event” (as defined in the employment agreement) were to occur). At any time, Products Corporation may give written notice of non-extension of the term of Mr. Gehrmann's agreement such that the term would expire on the third anniversary of such notice. Mr. Nichols' employment agreement with Products Corporation was amended and restated as of May 10, 1999 and amended as of January 1, 2000 and provides that he will serve as chief administrative officer or another equivalent executive position through February 28, 2003 at a base salary of not less than $650,000 and that management will recommend to the Compensation Committee that he be granted options to purchase 40,000 shares of Class A Common Stock each year during the term of the agreement (unless and until a “triggering event” (as defined in the employment agreement) were to occur). Mr. Fellows resigned from his employment with the Company effective November 1, 1999 and entered into a termination agreement with Products Corporation dated as of February 16, 2000 (the “Fellows Agreement”), which provides that he receive a separation allowance of $5,400,000 payable over a period to expire December 31, 2002, which allowance would be reduced in each calendar year on account of any compensation earned from employment or consulting services during such calendar year by an amount equal to fifty percent of the gross amount of such compensation earned up to $1,000,000. Pursuant to the Fellows Agreement, the Company made a payment to Mr. Fellows for 1999 in the amount of $1,800,000 and will make a payment for 2000 in the amount of $900,000. Ms. Dwyer resigned from her employment with the Company effective January 3, 2000 and entered into a termination agreement with Products Corporation dated as of November 23, 1999 (the “Dwyer Agreement”), which provides that she receive a separation allowance of $1,900,000 payable over a period of twenty-four months, the unpaid portion of which allowance would be reduced on account of any compensation earned for employment or consulting services after the date of acceptance of subsequent employment, provided that Ms. Dwyer could, upon commencing subsequent employment, elect instead of such reduction to be paid a cash lump sum amount equal to 50% of the remaining allowance. Pursuant to the Dwyer Agreement, the Company made a payment to Ms. Dwyer for 1999 of $475,000. Mr. Engelman resigned from his employment with the Company effective December 31, 1999 and entered into a termination agreement with Products Corporation dated as of November 17, 1999 (the “Engelman Agreement”), which provides that he receive severance pay for twelve months at a base salary rate of $700,000, which pay would not be reduced by compensation earned for employment of consulting services during the severance period. Pursuant to the Engelman Agreement, the Company made a payment to Mr. Engelman for 1999 in the amount of $525,000. During 1999, in connection with the Company's review of strategic alternatives and in order to retain its executives during such process, the Company guaranteed a minimum of 50% of targeted awards payable under the Executive Bonus Plan for 1999, regardless of achievement of corporate and/or business unit objectives. Messrs. Nugent's and Nichols' employment agreements provide for participation in the Executive Bonus Plan. Mr. Nugent's agreement also provides that he will receive not less than $500,000 as a bonus for 2000 regardless of whether Executive Bonus Plan objectives are attained for such year. Mr. Gehrmann's agreement provides for a bonus for 1999 equal to 75% of base salary and for 2000 and thereafter a bonus of 75% of Mr. Gehrmann's 1999 base salary payable in bi-weekly installments in lieu of annual bonus payments. All of the employment agreements currently in effect provide for continuation of life insurance and executive medical insurance coverage in the event of permanent disability and participation in other executive benefit plans on a basis equivalent to senior executives of the Company generally. The agreements with Messrs. Nugent and Nichols provide for Company-paid supplemental term 36 life insurance during employment in the amount of three times base salary, and all of the employment agreements currently in effect provide for Company-paid supplemental disability insurance. All of the employment agreements currently in effect provide for protection of Company confidential information and include a non-compete obligation. Mr. Gehrmann's agreement provides that in the event of termination of the term of the employment agreement by Mr. Gehrmann on 30 days' notice effective June 30, 2000 or for breach by the Company of a material provision of the employment agreement, failure of the Compensation Committee to adopt and implement the recommendations of management with respect to stock option grants, or following a “triggering event” (as defined in the employment agreement), Mr. Gehrmann would be entitled to continued base salary and bonus payments until the third anniversary of the date of termination (without reduction for compensation received by Mr. Gehrmann from other employment or consultancy) as well as continued participation in the Company's life insurance plan subject to a limit of two years and medical plans subject to the terms of such plans until the third anniversary of the date of termination or until Mr. Gehrmann were to become covered by like plans of another company. Mr. Nichols' agreement provides that in the event of termination of the term of the employment agreement by Mr. Nichols for breach by the Company of a material provision of the employment agreement, failure of the Compensation Committee to adopt and implement the recommendations of management with respect to stock option grants, or following a “triggering event” for “good reason” (as defined in the employment agreement), which event is not agreed to by Mr. Nichols, or by the Company (otherwise than for “cause”, as defined in the employment agreement, or disability), Mr. Nichols would be entitled, at his election, to severance pursuant to the Executive Severance Policy (see “- Executive Severance Policy”) (other than the six-month limit on lump sum payment provided for in the Executive Severance Policy, which provision would not apply to Mr. Nichols) or continued payments of base salary and bonus throughout the term and continued participation in the Company's life insurance plan subject to a limit of two years and medical plans subject to the terms of such plans throughout the term or until Mr. Nichols were covered by like plans of another company. Such payments to Mr. Nichols would only be reduced by compensation earned by Mr. Nichols from other employment or consultancy during such period if termination of employment were prior to a “triggering event” (as defined in the employment agreement). Mr. Nugent's agreement provides that in the event of termination of the term of the employment agreement by Mr. Nugent for breach by the Company of a material provision of the employment agreement or failure of the Compensation Committee to adopt and implement the recommendations of management with respect to stock option grants, or by the Company prior to December 31, 2002 (otherwise than for “cause” as defined in the employment agreement or disability), Mr. Nugent would be entitled, at his election, to severance pursuant to the Executive Severance Policy (see “-Executive Severance Policy”) (other than the six-month limit on lump sum payment provided for in the Executive Severance Policy, which provision would not apply to Mr. Nugent) or continued payments of base salary through December 31, 2004 and continued participation in the Company's life insurance plan subject to a limit of two years and medical plans subject to the terms of such plans through December 31, 2004 or until Mr. Nugent were covered by like plans of another company, continued Company-paid supplemental term life insurance and continued Company-paid supplemental disability insurance. Such payments to Mr. Nugent would be reduced by any compensation earned by Mr. Nugent from other employment or consultancy during such period. In addition, the employment agreement with Mr. Nugent provides that if he remains employed by Products Corporation or its affiliates until age 62, then upon any subsequent retirement he will be entitled to a supplemental pension benefit in a sufficient amount so that his annual pension benefit from all qualified and non-qualified pension plans of Products Corporation and its affiliates (expressed as a straight life annuity) equals $500,000. If Mr. Nugent's employment were to terminate prior to September 30, 2000 then he would receive no supplemental pension benefit. If his employment were to terminate on or after September 30, 2000 and prior to September 30, 2001 then he would receive 11.1% of the amount otherwise payable pursuant to his agreement and thereafter an additional 11.1% would accrue as of each September 30th on which Mr. Nugent is still employed (but in no event more than would have been payable to Mr. Nugent under the foregoing provision had he retired at age 62). Mr. Nugent would not receive any supplemental pension benefit and would be required to reimburse the Company for any supplemental pension benefits received if he were to terminate his employment prior to January 1, 2003 other than for “good reason” (as defined in the employment agreement), or if he were to breach the agreement or be terminated by the Company for “cause” (as defined in the employment agreement). Mr. Nugent’s employment agreement provides that he is entitled to a loan from Products Corporation of up to $500,000 for relocation expenses, which will be due and payable with interest at the applicable federal rate upon the earlier of the termination of his employment or five years from the initial loan. In addition, during the term of his employment agreement, Mr. Nugent will be entitled to additional compensation payable on a monthly basis equal to the amount actually paid by him in respect of interest and principal on a bank loan (the “Mortgage”) of up to 37 $1,500,000 obtained by Mr. Nugent to purchase a principal residence in the New York metropolitan area (the “Home Loan Payments”), plus a gross up for any taxes payable by Mr. Nugent as a result of such additional compensation. If Mr. Nugent terminates his employment for other than “good reason” or is terminated for “cause” (as such terms are defined in his employment agreement), then he shall be obligated to pay to Products Corporation an amount equal to the total amount of interest that would have been payable on the Home Loan Payments if the rate of interest on the Mortgage were the applicable federal rate in effect from time to time, plus the applicable tax gross up for such amounts. In addition, Mr. Nugent’s employment agreement provides that he shall be entitled to a special bonus, payable on January 15 of the year next following the year in which his employment terminates, equal to the product of (A) $1,500,000 less the amount of Home Loan Payments made prior to the termination multiplied by (B) the following percentages: for termination in 2000, 0%; for termination in 2001, 20%; for termination in 2002, 40%; for termination in 2003, 60%; for termination in 2004, 80%; and for termination in 2005 or thereafter, 100%. Notwithstanding the above, if Mr. Nugent terminates his employment for other than “good reason” or is terminated for “cause” (as such terms are defined in his employment agreement), or if he breaches certain post-employment covenants, any bonus described above shall be forfeited or repaid by Mr. Nugent, as the case may be. Executive Severance Policy Products Corporation's Executive Severance Policy provides that upon termination of employment of eligible executive employees, including Mr. Nugent and the other Named Executive Officers (other than Ms. Dwyer and Messrs. Fellows and Engelman), other than voluntary resignation or termination by Products Corporation for good reason, in consideration for the execution of a release and confidentiality agreement and the Company's standard employee non-competition agreement, the eligible executive will be entitled to receive, in lieu of severance under any employment agreement then in effect or under Products Corporation's basic severance plan, a number of months of severance pay in semi-monthly installments based upon such executive's grade level and years of service reduced by the amount of any compensation from subsequent employment, unemployment compensation or statutory termination payments received by such executive during the severance period, and, in certain circumstances, by the actuarial value of enhanced pension benefits received by the executive, as well as continued participation in medical and certain other benefit plans for the severance period (or in lieu thereof, upon commencement of subsequent employment, a lump sum payment equal to the then present value of 50% of the amount of base salary then remaining payable through the balance of the severance period). Pursuant to the Executive Severance Policy, upon meeting the conditions set forth therein, Messrs. Gehrmann, Nugent and Nichols would be entitled to severance pay equal to two years of base salary at the rate in effect on the date of employment termination plus continued participation in the medical and dental plans for two years on the same terms as active employees. 38 Defined Benefit Plans The following table shows the estimated annual retirement benefits payable (as of December 31, 1999) at normal retirement age (65) to a person retiring with the indicated average compensation and years of credited service, on a straight life annuity basis, after Social Security offset, under the Revlon Employees' Retirement Plan (the “Retirement Plan”), including amounts attributable to the Pension Equalization Plan, each as described below. Highest Consecutive Five-Year Average Compensation During Final 10 Years Estimated Annual Straight Life Annuity Benefits at Retirement With Indicated Years of Credited Service (a) 15 20 25 30 35 $ 600,000 700,000 800,000 900,000 1,000,000 1,100,000 1,200,000 1,300,000 1,400,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000 $151,701 177,701 203,701 229,701 255,701 281,701 307,701 333,701 359,701 385,701 500,000 500,000 $202,268 236,935 271,601 306,268 340,935 375,601 410,268 444,935 479,601 500,000 500,000 500,000 $252,835 296,168 339,502 382,835 426,168 469,502 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 $303,402 355,402 407,402 459,402 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 $303,402 355,402 407,402 459,402 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 (a)The normal form of benefit for the Retirement Plan and the Pension Equalization Plan is a straight life annuity. The Retirement Plan is intended to be a tax qualified defined benefit plan. Retirement Plan benefits are a function of service and final average compensation. The Retirement Plan is designed to provide an employee having 30 years of credited service with an annuity generally equal to 52% of final average compensation, less 50% of estimated individual Social Security benefits. Final average compensation is defined as average annual base salary and bonus (but not any part of bonuses in excess of 50% of base salary) during the five consecutive calendar years in which base salary and bonus (but not any part of bonuses in excess of 50% of base salary) were highest out of the last 10 years prior to retirement or earlier termination. Except as otherwise indicated, credited service includes all periods of employment with the Company or a subsidiary prior to retirement. The base salaries and bonuses of each of the Chief Executive Officer and the other Named Executive Officers are set forth in the Summary Compensation Table under columns entitled “Salary” and “Bonus,” respectively. The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, places certain maximum limitations upon the annual benefit payable under all qualified plans of an employer to any one individual. In addition, the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 limits the annual amount of compensation that can be considered in determining the level of benefits under qualified plans. The Pension Equalization Plan, as amended effective December 14, 1998, is a non-qualified benefit arrangement designed to provide for the payment by the Company of the difference, if any, between the amount of such maximum limitations and the annual benefit that would be payable under the Retirement Plan but for such limitations, up to a combined maximum annual straight life annuity benefit at age 65 under the Retirement Plan and the Pension Equalization Plan of $500,000. Benefits provided under the Pension Equalization Plan are conditioned on the participant's compliance with his or her non-competition agreement and on the participant not competing with Products Corporation for one year after termination of employment. The number of years of credited service under the Retirement Plan and the Pension Equalization Plan as of January 1, 2000 (rounded to full years) for Mr. Fellows is eleven years (which includes credit for prior service with Revlon Holdings Inc. (“Holdings”)), for Ms. Dwyer is six years, for Mr. Engelman is one year, for Mr. Gehrmann is six years and for Mr. Nichols is 21 years (which includes credit for prior service with Holdings). Mr. Nugent had no years of credited service as of January 1, 2000. 39 Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management The following table sets forth as of January 31, 2000 the number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned, and the percent so owned, by (i) each person known to the Company to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock, (ii) each director of the Company, (iii) each of the Chief Executive Officers during 1999 and each of the other Named Executive Officers during 1999 and (iv) all directors and executive officers of the Company as a group. The number of shares owned are those beneficially owned, as determined under the rules of the Commission, and such information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Under such rules, beneficial ownership includes any shares of Common Stock as to which a person has sole or shared voting power or investment power and any shares of Common Stock which the person has the right to acquire within 60 days through the exercise of any option, warrant or right, through conversion of any security or pursuant to the automatic termination of a power of attorney or revocation of a trust, discretionary account or similar arrangement. NAME AND ADDRESS OF BENEFICIAL OWNER AMOUNT AND NATURE OF BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP PERCENT OF CLASS Ronald O. Perelman 35 E. 62nd St. New York, NY 10021 Donald Drapkin M. Katherine Dwyer Irwin Engelman Meyer Feldberg George Fellows Frank J. Gehrmann Howard Gittis Morton L. Janklow Vernon E. Jordan Edward J. Landau Jerry W. Levin Wade H. Nichols III Jeffrey M. Nugent Linda Gosden Robinson Terry Semel Martha Stewart All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (14 Persons) *Less than one percent. 42,800,000 (Class A and Class B) (1) 83.5% 12,000 (Class A)(2) 131,117 (Class A)(3) 10,859 (Class A)(4) 0 384,686 (Class A)(5) 78,697 (Class A)(6) 15,000 (Class A) 0 0 100 451,489 (Class A)(7) 119,954 (Class A)(8) 0 0 5,000 (Class A)(9) 1,000 (10) 12,233,240 (Class A)(11) 31,250,000 (Class B) * * * 1.9% * * * 2.3% * * * 61.2% 100.0% (1) Mr. Perelman through Mafco Holdings (which through REV Holdings) beneficially owns 11,250,000 shares of Class A Common Stock (representing approximately 56.3% of the outstanding shares of Class A Common Stock) and all of the outstanding 31,250,000 shares of Class B Common Stock, which together represent approximately 83.0% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock and has approximately 97.4% of the combined voting power of the outstanding shares of Common Stock. All of the shares of Common Stock owned by REV Holdings are pledged by REV Holdings to secure obligations, and shares of intermediate holding companies are or may from time to time be pledged to secure obligations of Mafco Holdings or its affiliates. Mr. Perelman also holds an option to acquire 300,000 shares, which option vested on February 12, 1999. The vested option to acquire 300,000 shares together with the Class A and Class B Common Stock owned by Mr. Perelman represents approximately 83.5% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock. 40 (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) All of such shares are held by trusts for Mr. Drapkin's children and beneficial ownership is disclaimed. Includes 3,000 shares held directly; 625 shares acquired pursuant to the Company matching under the 401(k) Plan; 1,242 shares that Ms. Dwyer has the right to receive pursuant to the Company matching under the Excess Plan; 31,250, 31,250, 18,750 and 45,000 shares which may be acquired under options which vested on January 9, 1998, January 9, 1999, January 8, 1999 and February 28, 1999, respectively. Includes 10,000 shares owned jointly by Mr. Engelman's wife and 859 shares acquired pursuant to the Company matching under the Excess Plan. Includes 8,000 shares held directly; 314 shares acquired pursuant to the Company matching under the 401(k) Plan; 1,372 shares that Mr. Fellows has the right to receive pursuant to the Company matching under the Excess Plan; 42,500, 42,500, 120,000 and 170,000 shares which may be acquired under options which vested on January 9, 1999, January 9, 2000, February 28, 1999 and February 12, 2000, respectively. Includes 3,000 shares owned jointly by Mr. Gehrmann's wife; 578 shares acquired pursuant to the Company matching under the 401(k) Plan; 1,119 shares that Mr. Gehrmann has the right to receive pursuant to the Company matching under the Excess Plan; 2,500, 2,500, 2,500, 2,500, 3,000, 3,000, 3,000, 7,500, 7,500 and 40,000 shares which may be acquired under options which vested on February 28, 1997, February 28, 1998, February 28, 1999, February 28, 2000, January 9, 1998, January 9, 1999, January 9, 2000, January 8, 1999, January 8, 2000 and February 12, 2000, respectively. Includes 25,000 shares held directly by Mr. Levin; 1,000 shares owned by Mr. Levin's daughter as to which beneficial ownership is disclaimed; 129 shares acquired pursuant to the Company matching under the 401(k) Plan; 360 shares that Mr. Levin has the right to receive pursuant to the Company matching under the Excess Plan; 42,500, 42,500, 42,500, 42,500, 42,500, 42,500 and 170,000 shares which may be acquired under options which vested on January 9, 1998, January 9, 1999, January 9, 2000, January 8, 1999, January 8, 2000, March 2, 1999 and February 28, 1999, respectively. Includes 5,400 shares held directly; 568 shares acquired pursuant to the Company matching under the 401(k) Plan; 1,486 shares that Mr. Nichols has the right to receive pursuant to the Company matching under the Excess Plan; 7,500, 7,500, 7,500, 10,000, 10,000, 30,000 and 40,000 shares which may be acquired under options which vested on January 9, 1998, January 9, 1999, January 9, 2000, January 8, 1999, January 8, 2000, February 28, 1999 and February 12, 2000, respectively. Includes 2,000 shares owned by Mr. Semel's children as to which beneficial ownership is disclaimed and 3,000 shares owned jointly by Mr. Semel's wife. Includes 500 shares owned directly and 500 shares owned indirectly by the Martha Stewart Inc. Defined Benefit Pension Plan. Includes only shares held by persons who were directors and executive officers of the Company as of January 31, 2000. 41 Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions MacAndrews & Forbes beneficially owns shares of Common Stock having approximately 97.4% of the combined voting power of the outstanding shares of Common Stock. As a result, MacAndrews & Forbes is able to elect the entire Board of Directors of the Company and control the vote on all matters submitted to a vote of the Company's stockholders. MacAndrews & Forbes is wholly owned by Ronald O. Perelman, who is Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company. Transfer Agreements In June 1992, Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation entered into an asset transfer agreement with Holdings and certain of its wholly owned subsidiaries (the “Asset Transfer Agreement”), and Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation entered into a real property asset transfer agreement with Holdings (the “Real Property Transfer Agreement” and, together with the Asset Transfer Agreement, the “Transfer Agreements”), and pursuant to such agreements, on June 24, 1992 Holdings transferred assets to Products Corporation and Products Corporation assumed all the liabilities of Holdings, other than certain specifically excluded assets and liabilities (the liabilities excluded are referred to as the “Excluded Liabilities”). Certain consumer products lines sold in demonstrator assisted distribution channels considered not integral to the Company’s business and which historically had not been profitable (the "Retained Brands") and certain of the assets and liabilities were retained by Holdings. Holdings agreed to indemnify Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation against losses arising from the Excluded Liabilities, and Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation agreed to indemnify Holdings against losses arising from the liabilities assumed by Products Corporation. The amount reimbursed by Holdings to Products Corporation for the Excluded Liabilities for 1999 was $0.5 million. Operating Services Agreement In June 1992, Revlon, Inc., Products Corporation and Holdings entered into an operating services agreement (as amended and restated, and as subsequently amended, the “Operating Services Agreement”) pursuant to which Products Corporation has manufactured, marketed, distributed, warehoused and administered, including the collection of accounts receivable, the Retained Brands for Holdings. Pursuant to the Operating Services Agreement, Products Corporation was reimbursed an amount equal to all of its and Revlon, Inc.'s direct and indirect costs incurred in connection with furnishing such services, net of the amounts collected by Products Corporation with respect to the Retained Brands, payable quarterly. There were no amounts reimbursed by Holdings to Products Corporation for such direct and indirect costs for 1999. Reimbursement Agreements Revlon, Inc., Products Corporation and MacAndrews Holdings have entered into reimbursement agreements (the “Reimbursement Agreements”) pursuant to which (i) MacAndrews Holdings is obligated to provide (directly or through affiliates) certain professional and administrative services, including employees, to Revlon, Inc. and its subsidiaries, including Products Corporation, and purchase services from third party providers, such as insurance and legal and accounting services, on behalf of Revlon, Inc. and its subsidiaries, including Products Corporation, to the extent requested by Products Corporation, and (ii) Products Corporation is obligated to provide certain professional and administrative services, including employees, to MacAndrews Holdings (and its affiliates) and purchase services from third party providers, such as insurance and legal and accounting services, on behalf of MacAndrews Holdings (and its affiliates) to the extent requested by MacAndrews Holdings, provided that in each case the performance of such services does not cause an unreasonable burden to MacAndrews Holdings or Products Corporation, as the case may be. The Company reimburses MacAndrews Holdings for the allocable costs of the services purchased for or provided to the Company and its subsidiaries and for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with the provision of such services. MacAndrews Holdings (or such affiliates) reimburses the Company for the allocable costs of the services purchased for or provided to MacAndrews Holdings (or such affiliates) and for the reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with the purchase or provision of such services. The net amount reimbursed by MacAndrews Holdings to the Company for the services provided under the Reimbursement Agreements for 1999 was $0.5 million. Each of Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation, on the one hand, and MacAndrews Holdings, on the other, has agreed to indemnify the other party for losses arising out of 42 the provision of services by it under the Reimbursement Agreements other than losses resulting from its willful misconduct or gross negligence. The Reimbursement Agreements may be terminated by either party on 90 days' notice. The Company does not intend to request services under the Reimbursement Agreements unless their costs would be at least as favorable to the Company as could be obtained from unaffiliated third parties. Tax Sharing Agreement Revlon, Inc., for federal income tax purposes, is included in the affiliated group of which Mafco Holdings is the common parent, and Revlon, Inc.'s federal taxable income and loss is included in such group's consolidated tax return filed by Mafco Holdings. Revlon, Inc. also may be included in certain state and local tax returns of Mafco Holdings or its subsidiaries. In June 1992, Holdings, Revlon, Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries, and Mafco Holdings entered into a tax sharing agreement (as subsequently amended, the “Tax Sharing Agreement”), pursuant to which Mafco Holdings has agreed to indemnify Revlon, Inc. against federal, state or local income tax liabilities of the consolidated or combined group of which Mafco Holdings (or a subsidiary of Mafco Holdings other than Revlon, Inc. or its subsidiaries) is the common parent for taxable periods beginning on or after January 1, 1992 during which Revlon, Inc. or a subsidiary of Revlon, Inc. is a member of such group. Pursuant to the Tax Sharing Agreement, for all taxable periods beginning on or after January 1, 1992, Revlon, Inc. will pay to Holdings amounts equal to the taxes that Revlon, Inc. would otherwise have to pay if it were to file separate federal, state or local income tax returns (including any amounts determined to be due as a result of a redetermination arising from an audit or otherwise of the consolidated or combined tax liability relating to any such period which is attributable to Revlon, Inc.), except that Revlon, Inc. will not be entitled to carry back any losses to taxable periods ending prior to January 1, 1992. No payments are required by Revlon, Inc. if and to the extent Products Corporation is prohibited under the Credit Agreement from making tax sharing payments to Revlon, Inc. The Credit Agreement prohibits Products Corporation from making such tax sharing payments other than in respect of state and local income taxes. Since the payments to be made under the Tax Sharing Agreement will be determined by the amount of taxes that Revlon, Inc. would otherwise have to pay if it were to file separate federal, state or local income tax returns, the Tax Sharing Agreement will benefit Mafco Holdings to the extent Mafco Holdings can offset the taxable income generated by Revlon, Inc. against losses and tax credits generated by Mafco Holdings and its other subsidiaries. There were no cash payments in respect of federal taxes made by Revlon, Inc. pursuant to the Tax Sharing Agreement for 1999. Registration Rights Agreement Prior to the consummation of the Company's initial public equity offering in 1996, Revlon, Inc. and Revlon Worldwide Corporation (subsequently merged into REV Holdings), the then direct parent of Revlon, Inc., entered into the Registration Rights Agreement pursuant to which REV Holdings and certain transferees of Revlon, Inc.'s Common Stock held by REV Holdings (the “Holders”) have the right to require Revlon, Inc. to register all or part of the Class A Common Stock owned by such Holders and the Class A Common Stock issuable upon conversion of Revlon, Inc.'s Class B Common Stock owned by such Holders under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (a “Demand Registration”); provided that Revlon, Inc. may postpone giving effect to a Demand Registration up to a period of 30 days if Revlon, Inc. believes such registration might have a material adverse effect on any plan or proposal by Revlon, Inc. with respect to any financing, acquisition, recapitalization, reorganization or other material transaction, or if Revlon, Inc. is in possession of material non-public information that, if publicly disclosed, could result in a material disruption of a major corporate development or transaction then pending or in progress or in other material adverse consequences to Revlon, Inc. In addition, the Holders have the right to participate in registrations by Revlon, Inc. of its Class A Common Stock (a “Piggyback Registration”). The Holders will pay all out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with any Demand Registration. Revlon, Inc. will pay any expenses incurred in connection with a Piggyback Registration, except for underwriting discounts, commissions and expenses attributable to the shares of Class A Common Stock sold by such Holders. 43 Other Pursuant to a lease dated April 2, 1993 (the “Edison Lease”), Holdings leased to Products Corporation the Edison research and development facility for a term of up to 10 years with an annual rent of $1.4 million and certain shared operating expenses payable by Products Corporation which, together with the annual rent, were not to exceed $2.0 million per year. In August 1998, Holdings sold the Edison facility to an unrelated third party, which assumed substantially all liability for environmental claims and compliance costs relating to the Edison facility, and in connection with the sale Products Corporation terminated the Edison Lease and entered into a new lease with the new owner. Holdings agreed to indemnify Products Corporation to the extent rent under the new lease exceeds rent that would have been payable under the terminated Edison Lease had it not been terminated. The net amount reimbursed by Holdings to Products Corporation with respect to the Edison facility for 1999 was $0.2 million. During 1999, Products Corporation leased certain facilities to MacAndrews & Forbes or its affiliates to occupancy agreements and leases. These included space at Products Corporation's New York pursuant headquarters and at Products Corporation's offices in London. The rent paid to Products Corporation for 1999 was $1.1 million. Products Corporation's Credit Agreement is supported by, among other things, guarantees from Holdings and certain of its subsidiaries. The obligations under such guarantees are secured by, among other things, the capital stock and certain assets of certain subsidiaries of Holdings. Products Corporation borrows funds from its affiliates from time to time to supplement its working capital borrowings. No such borrowings were outstanding as of December 31, 1999. The interest rates for such borrowings are more favorable to Products Corporation than interest rates under the Credit Agreement and, for borrowings occurring prior to the execution of the Credit Agreement, the credit facilities in effect at the time of such borrowing. The amount of interest paid by Products Corporation for such borrowings for 1999 was $0.5 million. During 1998, the Company made advances of $0.25 million, $0.3 million and $0.4 million to Mr. Fellows, Ms. Dwyer, and Mr. Levin, respectively, which advances were repaid in 1999. During 1999, the Company made an advance of $0.4 million to Mr. Nugent. During 1999, a company that was an affiliate of the Company during part of 1999 assembled lipstick cases for Products Corporation. Products Corporation paid approximately $0.1 million for such services in 1999. During 1999, Products Corporation made payments of $0.1 million to a fitness center, an interest in which is owned by members of Mr. Drapkin's immediate family, for discounted health club dues for an executive health program of Products Corporation. The law firm of which Mr. Jordan is of counsel provided legal services to Revlon, Inc. and its subsidiaries during 1999, and it is anticipated that it will provide legal services to Revlon, Inc. and its subsidiaries during 2000. 44 PART IV Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K (a) List of documents filed as part of this Report: (1) Consolidated Financial Statements and Independent Auditors’ Report included herein: See Index on page F-1 (2) Financial Statement Schedule: See Index on page F-1 All other schedules are omitted as they are inapplicable or the required information is furnished in the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company or the Notes thereto. (3) List of Exhibits: Exhibit No. Description 3. 3.1 3.2 4. 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7 Certificate of Incorporation and By-Laws. Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Revlon, Inc. dated March 4, 1996. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 1996 of Revlon, Inc.). Amended and Restated By-Laws of Revlon, Inc. dated January 30, 1997. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996 of Revlon, Inc. (the “Revlon 1996 10-K”)). Instruments defining the right of security holders, including indentures. Indenture, dated as of February 1, 1998, between Revlon Escrow and U.S. Bank Trust National Association (formerly known as First Trust National Association), as Trustee, relating to the 8 1/8% Senior Notes due 2006 (the "8 1/8% Senior Notes Indenture"). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of Products Corporation filed with the Commission on March 12, 1998, File No. 333-47875 (the "Products Corporation 1998 Form S-1")). Indenture, dated as of February 1, 1998, between Revlon Escrow and U.S. Bank Trust National Association (formerly known as First Trust National Association), as Trustee, relating to the 8 5/8% Senior Notes Due 2006 (the "8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes Indenture"). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Products Corporation 1998 Form S-1). First Supplemental Indenture, dated April 1, 1998, among Products Corporation, Revlon Escrow, and the Trustee, amending the 8 1/8% Senior Notes Indenture. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Products Corporation 1998 Form S-1). First Supplemental Indenture, dated March 4, 1998, among Products Corporation, Revlon Escrow, (Incorporated by and the Trustee, amending the 8 5/8% Senior Subordinated Notes Indenture. reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Products Corporation 1998 Form S-1). Indenture, dated as of November 6, 1998, between Products Corporation and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as Trustee, relating to Products Corporation’s 9% Senior Notes due 2006. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.13 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 1998 of Revlon, Inc. (the "Revlon 1998 Third Quarter Form 10-Q")). Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of June 30, 1997, between Pacific Finance & Development Corp. and the Long-Term Credit Bank of Japan, Ltd. (the “Yen Credit Agreement”). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.11 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 1997 of Revlon, Inc.). First Amendment to the Yen Credit Agreement dated as of December 10, 1998. (Incorporated by 45 4.8 4.9 4.10 4.11 4.12 4.13 10. 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 10.5 10.6 10.7 reference to Exhibit 4.8 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 of Products Corporation filed with the Commission on December 18, 1998, File No. 33-69213 (the “Products Corporation 1998 S-4”)). Second Amendment to the Yen Credit Agreement dated as of November 12, 1999 by and among Pacific Finance & Development Corp. and General Electric Capital Corporation, assignee of the Long Term Credit Bank of Japan. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.13 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 1999 of Revlon, Inc. (the "Revlon 1999 Third Quarter Form 10-Q")). Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of May 30, 1997, among Products Corporation, The Chase Manhattan Bank, Citibank N.A., Lehman Commercial Paper Inc., Chase Securities Inc. and the lenders party thereto (the “Credit Agreement”). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.23 to Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of Revlon Worldwide (Parent) Corporation, filed with the Commission on June 26, 1997, File No. 33- 23451). First Amendment, dated as of January 29, 1998, to the Credit Agreement. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997 of Revlon, Inc. (the “Revlon 1997 10-K”)). Second Amendment, dated as of November 6, 1998, to the Credit Agreement. reference to Exhibit 4.12 to the Revlon 1998 Third Quarter Form 10-Q). (Incorporated by (Incorporated by Third Amendment, dated as of December 23, 1998, to the Credit Agreement. reference to Exhibit 4.12 to Amendment No. 1 to the Products Corporation 1998 Form S-4 filed with the Commission on January 22, 1999, File No. 33-69213). Fourth Amendment, dated as of November 10, 1999, to the Credit Agreement. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.12 to the Revlon 1999 Third Quarter Form 10-Q). Material Contracts. Asset Transfer Agreement, dated as of June 24, 1992, among Holdings, National Health Care Group, Inc., Charles of the Ritz Group Ltd., Products Corporation and Revlon, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Amendment No. 1 to the Revlon, Inc. Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the Commission on June 29, 1992, File No. 33-47100 (the “Revlon 1992 Amendment No. 1”)). Tax Sharing Agreement, dated as of June 24, 1992, among Mafco Holdings, Revlon, Inc., Products Corporation and certain subsidiaries of Products Corporation (the “Tax Sharing Agreement”). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Revlon 1992 Amendment No. 1). First Amendment, dated as of February 28, 1995, to the Tax Sharing Agreement. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994 of Products Corporation). Second Amendment, dated as of January 1, 1997, to the Tax Sharing Agreement. by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Revlon 1996 10-K). (Incorporated Second Amended and Restated Operating Services Agreement by and among Holdings, Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation, dated as of January 1, 1996 (the “Operating Services Agreement”). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Revlon 1996 10-K). Amendment to the Operating Services Agreement, dated as of July 1, 1997. reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Revlon 1997 10-K). (Incorporated by Employment Agreement amended and restated as of the 10th day of May, 1999, effective as of January 1, 1998, between Products Corporation and Wade H. Nichols (the "Nichols Employment Agreement"). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q 46 *10.8 *10.9 *10.10 10.11 10.12 10.13 10.14 10.15 10.16 10.17 10.18 *10.19 21. *21.1 23. *23.1 24. *24.1 *24.2 *24.3 for the quarterly period ended June 30, 1999 of Revlon, Inc.). Amendment, as of January 1, 2000 to the Nichols Employment Agreement. Employment Agreement dated as of May 10, 1999 between Products Corporation and Frank Gehrmann. Employment Agreement dated as of November 2, 1999 between Products Corporation and Jeffrey M. Nugent. Amended and Restated Revlon Pension Equalization Plan, amended and restated as of (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Annual Report on Form December 14, 1998. 10-K for year ended December 31, 1998 of Revlon, Inc.). Executive Supplemental Medical Expense Plan Summary dated July 1991. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of Revlon, Inc. filed with the Commission on May 22, 1992, File No. 33-47100 (the “Revlon 1992 Form S-1”)). Description of Post Retirement Life Insurance Program for Key Executives. reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Revlon 1992 Form S-1). (Incorporated by Benefit Plans Assumption Agreement dated as of July 1, 1992, by and among Holdings, Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1992 of Products Corporation). Revlon Executive Bonus Plan effective January 1, 1997. 10.20 to the Revlon 1996 10-K). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit Revlon Amended and Restated Executive Deferred Compensation Plan dated as of August 6, 1999. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to the Revlon 1999 Third Quarter Form 10-Q). (Incorporated by reference to Revlon Executive Severance Policy effective January 1, 1996. Exhibit 10.23 to the Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of Revlon, Inc. filed with the Commission on February 5, 1996, File No. 33-9958). Revlon, Inc. Second Amended and Restated 1996 Stock Plan (Amended and Restated as of February 12, 1999). (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 of Revlon, Inc. filed with the Commission on April 14, 1999, File No. 333-76267). Purchase Agreement dated as of February 18, 2000 by and among Revlon, Inc., Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, REMEA 2 B.V., Revlon Europe, Middle East and Africa, Ltd., Revlon International Corporation, Europeenne de Produits de Beaute S.A., Deutsche Revlon GmbH & Co. K.G., Revlon Canada, Inc., Revlon de Argentina, S.A.I.C., Revlon South Africa (Proprietary) Limited, Revlon (Suisse) S.A., Revlon Overseas Corporation C.A., CEIL – Comercial, Exportadora, Industrial Ltda., Revlon Manufacturing Ltd., Revlon Belgium N.V., Revlon (Chile) S.A., Revlon (Hong Kong) Limited, Revlon, S.A., Revlon Nederland B.V., Revlon New Zealand Limited, European Beauty Products S.p.A. and Beauty Care Professional Products Luxembourg, S.a.r.l. Subsidiaries. Subsidiaries of the Registrant. Consents of Experts and Counsel. Consent of KPMG LLP. Powers of Attorney. Power of Attorney of Ronald O. Perelman. Power of Attorney of Donald G. Drapkin. Power of Attorney of Meyer Feldberg. 47 *24.4 *24.5 *24.6 *24.7 *24.8 *24.9 *24.10 *24.11 27. Power of Attorney of Howard Gittis. Power of Attorney of Morton L. Janklow. Power of Attorney of Vernon E. Jordan, Jr., Esq. Power of Attorney of Edward J. Landau, Esq. Power of Attorney of Jerry W. Levin. Power of Attorney of Linda Gosden Robinson. Power of Attorney of Terry Semel. Power of Attorney of Martha Stewart. Financial Data Schedule. ____________________ * Filed herewith. (b) Reports on Form 8-K – None. 48 

Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above