Revlon, Inc. Annual Report 2004

FY2004 Annual Report · Revlon, Inc.

Loading PDF…

JACK L. STAHL
President and Chief Executive Ofﬁcer

DEAR SHAREHOLDERS:

Our Company accomplished a great deal in 2004.

We built on the signiﬁcant progress we made in 2003 to build our brands,
strengthen our retail partnerships and improve the Revlon organization. We
also made dramatic progress in improving our new product development
process, strengthening our capital structure, and embarking on the
implementation of our Destination Model — a series of strategic initiatives
and productivity programs designed to dramatically improve our proﬁt
margins over the next several years.

In addition, we aggressively managed the business during the year and delivered the operating proﬁt commit-
ments we laid out to the investment community for 2004. So, as we look back on a very eventful year, we are
pleased with what we’ve accomplished, and we are excited about the signiﬁcant opportunities that lie ahead.

Speciﬁc highlights of our Company’s progress in 2004 include:

• The achievement of a 7% operating income margin and Adjusted EBITDA1 of $193 million, including $6

million in restructuring expenses;

• A dramatic reduction in debt and interest expense, stemming from our successful debt-for-equity exchange

offers and subsequent reﬁnancings;

• The implementation and early success of our Destination Model;

• The development of breakthrough advertising with the potential to transform the traditional approach to

media in the mass market channel;

• The fourth quarter launch of our ﬁrst wave of new products borne from our new, cross-functional new product

development process; and

• The enhancement to our comprehensive corporate governance standards.

Building on the capital structure improvements made in 2004, earlier this year we consummated a notes offering
to reﬁnance two shorter-term maturities of debt and reduce our exposure to ﬂoating rate debt. These
transactions further strengthen our balance sheet and represent another building block in our goal to achieve
long-term proﬁtable growth and value creation.

A CLOSER LOOK AT 2004

This past year was a signiﬁcant one for Revlon on a number of critical dimensions. Not only did our important
color cosmetics business — which you will recall represents some two-thirds of our worldwide business — launch
new advertising and ready its ﬁrst wave of new products from our new, cross-functional new product
development process, but we also delivered signiﬁcantly improved operating proﬁtability and a dramatically
improved capital structure. The following pages provide a brief discussion of several key areas of progress made
during the year and the importance this progress represents to our future.

Financial Performance and Destination Model

While we recognize that we still have a lot to do, we are proud of the progress we made in 2004 to strengthen
our ﬁnancial performance. We dramatically improved our operating results, delivering signiﬁcant cost savings
stemming from the initial implementation of our Destination Model.

($ in millions, except per share data)

Key Data
Net Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
% of Net Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2003
$1,299
$21
1.6%

2004
$1,297
$89
6.9%

Net Earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted Earnings Per Share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
# Shares Outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

($154)
($2.47)
62,327,726

($143)*
($0.47)*
301,053,334

Change
—
+324%
+5.3 pts.

+7%
+81%
+383%

Includes charges of $91m ($0.30 per diluted share) in 2004 for the loss on the early extinguishment of debt.

Other Data
Adjusted EBITDA1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2003
$122

2004
$193

Change
+58%

Our Destination Model is a long-term proﬁt model that details the opportunities we believe exist to increase our
operating proﬁt margins by approximately eight to ten margin points within a ﬁve-year period of time beginning
in 2003. Our focus in 2004 was on increasing our efﬁciency and effectiveness in our promotional process,
reducing our global manufacturing and supply chain costs and reducing our manufacturing cost structure. We
made progress in each of these three areas during the year, and we expect to continue to implement these and
other productivity programs and initiatives in 2005 and beyond and to reach our Destination Model proﬁtability
level over the next several years.

Our International operations achieved another very strong year in 2004. Our business in the Asia Paciﬁc region
continued to lead this performance, on the strength of continued growth momentum in the key markets of
Australia and South Africa. Our business in Latin America also turned in a solid performance this past year. During
2004, we began to implement a strategic initiative to optimize our international supply chain, with our ﬁrst area
of focus being Europe. We made very good progress during this past year and expect to continue to reap the
beneﬁts of this important initiative as we move forward.

New Advertising and New Products Capability

During the year, we began to aggressively address the recent slowdown in the U.S. mass market channel for color
cosmetics. We understand what motivates consumers to buy and use cosmetics, and we recognized that the
advertising in the category was not tapping into the emotional elements that drive purchase intent.

To address this, we began to execute against a new advertising strategy that we believe is far more sophisticated
and emotionally based than anything that existed in this category. Our key retail customers have supported this
and other initiatives that we have begun to implement to drive fun and excitement in the category.

We also made meaningful progress on the new product development front, with the launch in the fourth quarter
of our ﬁrst wave of new products coming out of our new, cross-functional new product development process.
These new products, many of which are displayed within or on the cover of this Report, include both restages of
several existing franchises and completely new introductions. Included among the restages are our Revlon Age
Defying with Botaﬁrm, Revlon Super Lustrous Lipstick, and Revlon Nail Enamel. Completely new to the market
for 2005 are Revlon Fabulash Mascara, Revlon ColorStay 12-Hour Eye Shadow, Almay Intense i-Color, and Almay
Truly Lasting Color to name a few.

These new products represent just the beginning of our new capability in this area, and we are very excited about
the opportunities that we envision for the future.

New Capital Structure and Enhanced Corporate Governance

A dramatic achievement of 2004 was the improvement we made to our capital structure. We indicated during
2003 that improving our capital structure would take on increasing focus in 2004. Early in the year, we
consummated debt-for-equity exchange offers that converted over $800 million of debt into equity and
signiﬁcantly reduced our annual interest expense. But we didn’t stop there. In mid-year, we extended the
maturities on a portion of our debt through a series of reﬁnancing transactions, which also had the beneﬁt of
further reducing our annual interest expense.

More recently, in March of 2005, we took action to build on this progress and further strengthened our capital
structure through a notes offering that both extended the maturities of our debt that would have otherwise
matured in 2006 and reduced our exposure to ﬂoating rate debt.

And . . . we’re not done yet. We are committed to launching an equity offering by March 2006 and to use the
proceeds of the offering to reduce debt. This is just one more example of our ongoing focus on strengthening our
capital structure over time.

On the corporate governance front, the Company and our Board of Directors have made the continued
strengthening of our governance standards an important area of focus over the past couple of years. We
continue to maintain a majority of independent directors on our Board and, over the past year, our comprehen-
sive Corporate Governance Program was further enhanced, including the formation of an independent
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.

During the year, we welcomed to our Board Kenneth Wolfe, retired Chairman and CEO of Hershey Foods
Corporation, and Paul Bohan, retired Managing Director of Salomon Smith Barney, a unit of Citigroup Inc. These
two distinguished gentlemen will be invaluable to our Company as we move forward.

OUTLOOK FOR THE FUTURE

In closing, I can say with conﬁdence that Revlon is a much stronger Company today than at any time in recent
history. We have put in place many important building blocks and, while we still have much work to do, we are
well on our way to achieving our objective of long-term proﬁtable growth.

I am grateful to Revlon employees for all of their contributions and to all of our stakeholders for their support on
Revlon’s success journey.

Sincerely,

Jack L. Stahl
President and Chief Executive Ofﬁcer

April 2005

(1) Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP ﬁnancial measure that the Company deﬁnes as net earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation,
amortization, gains/losses on foreign currency transactions, gains/losses on the sale of assets, gains/losses on the early extinguishment
of debt, and miscellaneous expenses. Page A-1 of this Report contains a reconciliation to net loss and net cash used for operating
activities, the most directly comparable GAAP measures.

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K/A

FOR ANNUAL AND TRANSITION REPORTS PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

(Mark One)

(cid:1) ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

□ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from

For the ﬁscal year ended December 31, 2004

Commission ﬁle number 1-11178
REVLON, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as speciﬁed in its charter)

DELAWARE
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)

237 Park Avenue, New York, New York
(Address of principal executive ofﬁces)

13-3662955
(I.R.S. Employer
Identiﬁcation No.)

10017
(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (212) 527-4000

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) or 12(g) of the Act:

Title of each class
Class A Common Stock

Name of each exchange on which registered
New York Stock Exchange

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has ﬁled all reports required to be ﬁled by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to ﬁle such reports), and (2) has been subject to such ﬁling requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes (cid:1) No□

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent ﬁlers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained
herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in deﬁnitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. (cid:1)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated ﬁler (as deﬁned in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934).
Yes (cid:1) No □

As of December 31, 2004, 338,867,944 shares of Class A Common Stock and 31,250,000 shares of Class B Common
Stock were outstanding. 20,819,333 shares of Class A Common Stock and all of the shares of Class B Common Stock
were owned by REV Holdings LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and an indirectly wholly-owned subsidiary
of MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings Inc., and 169,291,308 shares of Class A Common Stock were beneﬁcially owned
by MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings Inc. and its afﬁliates. The aggregate market value of the registrant’s Class A
Common Stock held by non-afﬁliates (using the New York Stock Exchange closing price as of June 30, 2004, the last
business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second ﬁscal quarter) was approximately $438,834,044.

Explanatory Note:

Revlon, Inc. is ﬁling Amendment No. 1 to its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2004 ﬁled with the Securites and Exchange Commission (the ‘‘SEC’’ or the ‘‘Commission’’)
on March 10, 2005 to amend such report for the following reasons:

Revlon, Inc. previously disclosed in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2004, which it ﬁled with the SEC on March 10, 2005, that it intended to include the required reports
and attestations concerning its internal control over ﬁnancial reporting required under Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (‘‘Sarbanes-Oxley’’) and the related SEC rules and regulations in an
amendment to its Annual Report on Form 10-K in accordance with the SEC’s exemptive order in SEC
Release No. 50754, which provided qualiﬁed issuers with a 45-day extension for ﬁling these reports and
attestations. Revlon, Inc. has recently completed its analysis, documentation and testing of its system of
internal control over ﬁnancial reporting and has prepared its report on the effectiveness of its internal
control over ﬁnancial reporting, and Revlon, Inc.’s independent registered public accounting ﬁrm, KPMG
LLP, has completed its audit and report on management’s assessment of its internal control over ﬁnancial
reporting, each of which are required to be included in Revlon, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the ﬁscal year ended December 31, 2004 under Section 404 of Sarbanes-Oxley and the SEC’s related rules
and regulations. Accordingly, Revlon, Inc. is ﬁling this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A to include such
reports and attestations.

Revlon, Inc. also disclosed in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004
that its wholly-owned subsidiary, Revlon Consumer Products Corporation (‘‘Products Corporation’’),
intended to complete in the ﬁrst quarter of 2005 a reﬁnancing of its 81⁄8% Senior Notes due 2006 and its
9% Senior Notes due 2006. As previously announced on March 16, 2005, Products Corporation completed
an offering of $310 million aggregate principal amount of 9½% Senior Notes due 2011 and used the
proceeds to, among other things, defease all of the $116.2 million aggregate principal amount outstanding
of its 81⁄8% Senior Notes and all of the $75.5 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of its 9%
Senior Notes, each of which will be redeemed on April 15, 2005, and also prepaid $100 million of the term
loan facility under its 2004 credit agreement (together, the ‘‘2005 Reﬁnancing Transactions’’). Accordingly,
this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A amends certain information regarding the consummation of the 2005
Reﬁnancing Transactions.

Based on the foregoing, the following items were amended:

• ‘‘Part II – Item 9A – Controls and Procedures’’ has been amended in this Form 10-K/A to
include Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and
related conforming changes have been made in this Form 10-K/A in ‘‘Part II—Forward
Looking Statements’’, ‘‘Part III, Item 14—Principal Accountant Fees and Services’’ and
‘‘Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2—Certiﬁcations’’.

• Additionally, the report of Revlon, Inc.’s independent registered public accounting ﬁrm,
KPMG LLP, attesting on management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over
ﬁnancial reporting, has been added to this Form 10-K/A in the ﬁnancial statements at page
F-3.

• Further, as the 2005 Reﬁnancing Transactions were in fact consummated in the interim period
between the March 10, 2005 ﬁling of the Company’s original Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the ﬁscal year ended December 31, 2004 and the ﬁling of this amendment to such Form
10-K, the following sections have been amended in this Form 10-K/A to reﬂect the
consummation of the 2005 Reﬁnancing Transactions: ‘‘Part I, Item 1. – Business—Recent
Developments’’, ‘‘Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements—Subsequent Events’’
and ‘‘Part IV, Item 15.—Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules’’. ‘‘Note 9 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements—Long-term Debt’’ also has been amended to include
additional references to ‘‘(See ‘‘Subsequent Events’’ in Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements)’’.

In addition and pursuant to Rule 12b-15 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the
Company is ﬁling herewith certain currently dated certiﬁcations. No other information contained in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K is being amended hereby.

(Dollars in Millions, Except Per Share Data)

Part I

Item 1. Business

Background

Revlon, Inc. (and together with its subsidiaries, the ‘‘Company’’) conducts its business exclusively
through its direct subsidiary, Revlon Consumer Products Corporation (‘‘Products Corporation’’), which
manufactures, markets and sells an extensive array of cosmetics and skin care, fragrances and personal
care products. Revlon is one of the world’s leading mass-market cosmetics brands. Revlon believes that
its global brand name recognition, product quality and marketing experience have enabled it to create one
of the strongest consumer brand franchises in the world. The Company’s products are sold worldwide and
marketed under such well-known brand names as Revlon, ColorStay, Revlon Age Defying, Revlon Age
Defying with Botaﬁrm, Fabulash, Super Lustrous, and Skinlights, as well as Almay, including the
Company’s new Almay Intense i-color collection, in cosmetics; Vitamin C Absolutes, Eterna 27, Ultima II
and Jeanne Gatineau in skin care; Charlie in fragrances; and High Dimension, Flex, Mitchum, Colorsilk,
Jean Naté and Bozzano in personal care products.

The Company was founded by Charles Revson, who revolutionized the cosmetics industry by
introducing nail enamels matched to lipsticks in fashion colors over 70 years ago. Today, the Company has
leading market positions in a number of its principal product categories in the U.S. mass-market
distribution channel, including the lip, face makeup and nail enamel categories. The Company also has
leading market positions in several product categories in certain markets outside of the U.S., including in
Australia, Canada, Mexico and South Africa. The Company’s products are sold in more than 100
countries across six continents.

All U.S. market share and market position data herein for the Company’s brands are based upon
retail dollar sales, which are derived from ACNielsen data. ACNielsen measures retail sales volume of
products sold in the U.S. mass-market distribution channel. Such data represent ACNielsen’s estimates
based upon data gathered by ACNielsen from market samples, which ACNielsen adjusts from time to
time, and are therefore subject to some degree of variance. Additionally, as of August 4, 2001,
ACNielsen’s data do not reﬂect sales volume from Wal-Mart, Inc., which is the Company’s largest
customer, representing approximately 21.0% of the Company’s 2004 consolidated net sales.

The Company’s Plan

The Company’s plan consists of three main components: (1) the cost rationalization phase; (2) the
stabilization and growth phase; and (3) the continued growth momentum and accelerated growth phase.

Phase 1 — Cost Rationalization

In 1999 and 2000, the Company faced a number of strategic challenges. Accordingly, through 2001 the
Company focused its plan on lowering costs and improving operating efﬁciency. The Company believes
that the actions taken during 2000 and 2001 lowered aspects of the Company’s cost structure and
improved the Company’s manufacturing and operating efﬁciency, creating a platform for the stabilization
and growth stage of its plan.

Phase 2 — Stabilization and Growth

In February 2002, the Company announced the appointment of Jack L. Stahl, former president and
chief operating ofﬁcer of The Coca-Cola Company, as the Company’s new President and Chief Executive
Ofﬁcer.

Following the appointment of Mr. Stahl, the Company undertook an extensive review and evaluation
of the Company’s business to establish speciﬁc integrated objectives and actions to advance the next stage
in the Company’s plan. As a result of this review, the Company established three principal objectives:

•

creating and developing the most consumer-preferred brands;

becoming the most valuable partner to the Company’s retailers; and

becoming a top company where people choose to work.

The Company also conducted detailed evaluations and research of the strengths of the Revlon brand
and the Almay brand; the Company’s advertising and promotional efforts; the Company’s relationships
with the Company’s retailers and consumers; its retail in-store presence; and the strength and skills of the
Company’s organization. As a result, the Company developed the following key actions and investments
to support the stabilization and growth phase of its plan:

•

Increase advertising and media effectiveness. The Company is seeking to improve the effective-
ness of its marketing, including its advertising, by, among other things, targeting its advertising
spend to optimize its impact on the Company’s consumers, ensuring consistent messaging and
imagery in its advertising, in the graphics included in the Company’s wall displays and in other
marketing materials.

Increase the marketing effectiveness of the Company’s wall displays. The Company made
signiﬁcant improvements to its retail wall displays by streamlining its product assortment and
reconﬁguring product placement, intended to optimize cross-selling among the Company’s
various product categories on the wall displays and make the displays easier to merchandise and
stock. The Company has continued to focus on enhancing the effectiveness of its merchandiser
coverage to improve in-store stock levels and work with its retail customers to improve
replenishment of the Company’s products on the wall displays and to minimize out-of-stocks at
its retail customers.

• Adopt revised pricing strategies. The Company has been selectively adjusting prices on certain
stock keeping units, or SKUs, to better align the Company’s pricing with product beneﬁts and
competitive benchmarks.

•

Further strengthen the Company’s new product development process. The Company has
developed and is implementing a new cross-functional product development process intended to
optimize the Company’s ability to bring to market its new product offerings and to ensure that
the Company has products in key trend categories. The Company’s lineup of new products for
2005 is the result of this new product development process.

Implement a comprehensive program to develop and train the Company’s employees. The
Company continues to implement its comprehensive program to further develop the manage-
ment, leadership and communication skills of its employees, which the Company will regularly
assess as part of its goal to become a top company where people choose to work.

In December 2002, Revlon, Inc. announced that it would accelerate aspects of the implementation of
the stabilization and growth phase of its plan. The Company recorded charges of approximately $104 in
2002 and approximately $31 during 2003. These charges related to various aspects of the stabilization and
growth phase of the Company’s plan, primarily from sales returns and inventory writedowns from a
selective reduction of SKUs, reduced distribution of the Ultima II brand, higher allowances due to
selective price adjustments on certain products, professional expenses associated with the development of,
research in relation to, and execution of the stabilization and growth phase of the Company’s plan, and
writedowns associated with reconﬁguring existing wall displays at the Company’s retail customers. These
charges do not include brand support expenses and training and development costs.

Phase 3 — Continued Growth Momentum and Accelerated Growth

•

Further improve the new product development and implementation process.

• Continue to increase the effectiveness and reduce the cost of the Company’s display wall.

• Drive efﬁciencies across the Company’s overall supply chain. The Company plans to reduce
manufacturing costs by streamlining components and sourcing strategically and rationalizing its
supply chain in Europe, which will include moving certain production for the European markets
primarily to the Company’s Oxford, North Carolina facility, and entering into new warehousing
and distribution arrangements in the U.K.

• Optimize the effectiveness of the Company’s advertising, marketing and promotions.

• Continue the training and development of its organization. The Company will continue the
training and development of our employees so that we may continue to improve our capability
to execute our strategies while providing enhanced job satisfaction.

• Continue to strengthen the Company’s balance sheet and capital structure. The Company
strengthened its balance sheet by completing two signiﬁcant ﬁnancing transactions during 2004:
(i) the Company exchanged approximately $804 of Products Corporation’s debt, $54.6 of Revlon,
Inc.’s preferred stock and $9.9 of accrued interest for 299,969,493 shares of Revlon, Inc. Class A
common stock, with a par value of $0.01 per share (‘‘Class A Common Stock’’); and (ii) Products
Corporation entered into a new 2004 Credit Agreement (as hereinafter deﬁned), consisting of an
$800 term loan facility and a $160 asset-based multi-currency revolving credit facility, and used
the proceeds to reﬁnance its 2001 Credit Agreement (as hereinafter deﬁned) and to complete a
tender offer and subsequent redemption of all $363 aggregate principal amount outstanding of
its 12% Senior Secured Notes due 2005.

The Company is in the process of reviewing its advertising agencies as part of its strategy to optimize
the effectiveness of its advertising, marketing and promotions and the Company expects decisions related
to such matters will be made in the ﬁrst quarter of 2005. Continuing to implement and reﬁne the
Company’s plan could include taking advantage of opportunities to reposition, repackage or reformulate
one or more of the Company’s brands or product lines, launching new brands or product lines or further
reﬁning our approach to retail merchandising. Any of these actions, whose intended purpose would be to
create value through proﬁtable growth, could result in the Company making investments or recognizing
charges related to executing against such opportunities.

Recent Developments

On March 11, 2005, Products Corporation entered into, and on March 16, 2005 consummated the
transactions contemplated by, a Purchase Agreement (the ‘‘Purchase Agreement’’) with certain initial
purchasers (the ‘‘Initial Purchasers’’) for the sale of $310 aggregate principal amount of its 9½% Senior
Notes due 2011 (the ‘‘9½% Senior Notes’’). On March 16, 2005, Revlon, Inc. issued a press release
announcing that Products Corporation had completed its previously announced offering of $310
aggregate principal amount of the 9½% Senior Notes. The offering and the related transactions extended
the maturities of Products Corporation’s debt that would have otherwise been due in 2006 and reduced,
in part, Products Corporation’s exposure to ﬂoating rate debt.

principal amount outstanding of its 9% Senior Notes due 2006 (the ‘‘9% Senior Notes’’) and that it has
effected a covenant defeasance of its 81⁄8% Senior Notes and 9% Senior Notes by (i) mailing on March 16,
2005 irrevocable notices of redemption with respect to such notes, and (ii) irrevocably depositing on
March 16, 2005 in trust with the trustee under the indentures an amount sufﬁcient to redeem such notes.
Revlon, Inc. also indicated that Products Corporation used a portion of the proceeds from the offering (i)
to prepay $100 of indebtedness outstanding under the Term Loan Facility of its 2004 Credit Agreement
(as each such term is hereinafter deﬁned), together with accrued interest and the $5.0 prepayment fee
associated with such prepayment, and (ii) to pay a portion of the fees and expenses incurred in connection
with the transactions described above (such transactions being referred to as the ‘‘2005 Reﬁnancing
Transactions’’).

The 9½% Senior Notes were issued by Products Corporation pursuant to an indenture, dated as of
March 16, 2005 (the ‘‘9½% Senior Notes Indenture’’), by and between Products Corporation and U.S.
Bank National Association, as trustee. Pursuant to the terms of the 9½% Senior Notes Indenture, the 9½%
Senior Notes are senior unsecured debt of Products Corporation equal in right of payment with any of
Products Corporation’s present and future senior indebtedness. The 9½% Senior Notes bear interest at an
annual rate of 9½%, which will be payable on April 1 and October 1 of each year, commencing on October
1, 2005. The 9½% Senior Notes Indenture provides that Products Corporation may redeem the 9½%
Senior Notes at its option in whole or in part at any time on or after April 1, 2008, at the redemption prices
set forth in the 9½% Senior Notes Indenture. In addition, at any time prior to April 1, 2008, Products
Corporation is entitled to redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the 9½% Senior Notes
at a redemption price of 109.5% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any,
thereon to the date ﬁxed for redemption, with, and, to the extent actually received, the net cash proceeds
of one or more public equity offerings, provided that at least 65% of the aggregate principal amount of
the 9½% Senior Notes originally issued remains outstanding immediately after giving effect to such
redemption. In addition, the 9½% Senior Notes Indenture provides that Products Corporation is entitled
to redeem the 9½% Senior Notes at any time or from time to time prior to April 1, 2008, at a redemption
price per note equal to the sum of (1) the then outstanding principal amount thereof, plus (2) accrued and
unpaid interest (if any) to the date of redemption, plus (3) the greater of (i) 1.0% of the then outstanding
principal amount of such note at such time and (ii) the excess of (A) the present value at such redemption
date of (1) the redemption price of such note on April 1, 2008 (exclusive of any accrued interest) plus (2)
all required remaining scheduled interest payments due on such note through April 1, 2008, computed
using a discount rate equal to the applicable treasury rate plus 75 basis points, over (B) the then
outstanding principal amount of such note at such time. Pursuant to the 9½% Senior Notes Indenture,
upon a change of control (as deﬁned in the 9½% Senior Notes Indenture), each holder of the 9½% Senior
Notes has the right to require Products Corporation to make an offer to repurchase all or a portion of such
holder’s 9½% Senior Notes at a price equal to 101% of the principal amount of such holder’s 9½% Senior
Notes plus accrued interest.

The 9½% Senior Notes Indenture contains covenants which, subject to certain exceptions, limit the
ability of Products Corporation and its subsidiaries to, among other things, incur additional indebtedness,
pay dividends on or redeem or repurchase stock, engage in certain asset sales, make certain types of
investments and other restricted payments, engage in transactions with afﬁliates, restrict dividends or
payments from subsidiaries and create liens on their assets. The 9½% Senior Notes Indenture contains
customary events of default.

Notes (or September 12, 2005), use its best efforts to cause the exchange offer registration statement to
be declared effective under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the ‘‘Securities Act’’). Products
Corporation agreed to keep the exchange offer open for not less than 30 days (or longer if required by
applicable law) after the date notice of the exchange offer is mailed to the holders of the 9½% Senior
Notes. In addition, Products Corporation agreed that, in the event that applicable interpretations of the
staff of the SEC do not permit Products Corporation to effect such an exchange offer, or if for any other
reason the exchange offer is not consummated by the 210th day after the closing of the offering of the
9½% Senior Notes (or October 12, 2005), it will, at its cost, (a) as promptly as practicable, ﬁle a shelf
registration statement covering resales of the 9½% Senior Notes, (b) use its best efforts to cause the shelf
registration statement to be declared effective under the Securities Act and (c) use its best efforts to keep
effective the shelf registration statement until two years after its effective date. Products Corporation also
agreed that, if by the 90th day following the closing of the offering of the 9½% Senior Notes (or June 14,
2005), a registration statement has not been ﬁled with the SEC with respect to the exchange offer or the
resale of the 9½% Senior Notes, the rate per annum at which the 9½% Senior Notes bear interest will
increase by 0.5% from and including such date, until but excluding the earlier of (i) the date such
registration statement is ﬁled and (ii) the 210th day after the closing of the offering of the 9½% Senior
Notes (or October 12, 2005); and if by such date neither (i) the exchange offer is consummated nor (ii)
the shelf registration statement is declared effective, the rate per annum at which the 9½% Senior Notes
bear interest will increase by 0.5% from and including such date, until but excluding the earlier of (i) the
consummation of the exchange offer and (ii) the effective date of a shelf registration statement.

Products

The Company manufactures and markets a variety of products worldwide. The following table sets

forth the Company’s principal brands and certain selected products.

COSMETICS

HAIR

BEAUTY TOOLS

FRAGRANCE

ANTI-
PERSPIRANTS/
DEODORANTS

SKIN

Revlon

Almay

Colorsilk

Revlon Beauty Tools

Charlie

Mitchum

Gatineau

High Dimension

Jean Nate´

Almay

Ultima II

Frost & Glow

Cosmetics — Revlon: The Company sells a broad range of cosmetics and skin care products under
its ﬂagship Revlon brand designed to fulﬁll speciﬁcally-identiﬁed consumer needs, principally priced in
the upper range of the mass-market distribution channel, including lip makeup, nail color and nail care
products, eye and face makeup and skin care products such as lotions, cleansers, creams, toners and
moisturizers. Many of the Company’s products incorporate patented, patent-pending or proprietary
technology. See ‘‘New Product Development and Research and Development’’.

The Company markets several different lines of Revlon lip makeup (which address different
segments of the lip makeup category). The Company’s ColorStay lipcolor uses patented transfer-resistant
technology that provides long wear; ColorStay Overtime Lipcolor patented lip technology builds on the
strengths of the ColorStay franchise by offering long-wearing beneﬁts in a new product form, which
enhances comfort and shine. Super Lustrous lipstick is the Company’s ﬂagship wax-based lipcolor, which
has been further improved in 2005 with the addition of Liqui-Silk technology. In 2004, the Company
introduced Super Lustrous Lipgloss, providing a non-sticky, high-gloss shine that coordinates with Super
Lustrous shades.

The Company’s nail color and nail care lines include enamels, cuticle preparations and enamel
removers. The Company’s ﬂagship Revlon nail enamel uses a patented formula that provides consumers
with improved wear, application, shine and gloss in a toluene-free, formaldehyde-free and phthalate-free
formula. The Company also sells Cutex nail polish remover and nail care products in certain countries
outside the U.S. In 2003, the Company launched ColorStay Always On nail enamel, which offers 10-day
superior color and wear in an exclusive 2-step system.

The Company sells face makeup, including foundation, powder, blush and concealers, under such
Revlon brand names as Revlon Age Defying, which is targeted for women in the over-35 age bracket;
ColorStay and ColorStay Stay Natural, which uses patented transfer-resistant technology that provides
long wear and ‘‘won’t rub off’’ beneﬁts; New Complexion, for younger consumers and Skinlights skin
brighteners that brighten skin with sheer washes of color. In 2004, the Company updated and simpliﬁed
its line of blush products to better assist the consumer in her selection. For 2005, the Revlon Age Defying
franchise has been further improved with the incorporation of Botaﬁrm, to help reduce the appearance
of lines and wrinkles.

The Company’s eye makeup products include mascaras, eyeliners and eye shadows. In mascaras, key
franchises include ColorStay, both base ColorStay, as well as ColorStay Overtime lash tint, a patented
product that wears for up to three days, and Lash Fantasy Primer and Mascara, a double-ended mascara
that nourishes the lashes while lifting and lengthening. The eyeshadow franchises include Illuminance, an
eye shadow that gives a luminous ﬁnish, as well as Eyeglide Shimmer Shadow, a cream shadow in a
twist-up package. In 2005, the Company introduced Fabulash, with a lash-maximizing formula for 100%
fuller lashes.

Cosmetics — Almay: The Company’s Almay brand consists of a line of hypo-allergenic,
dermatologist-tested, fragrance-free cosmetics and skin care products. Almay products include lip
makeup, eye and face makeup, and skin care products. The Almay brand ﬂagship One Coat franchise
consists of lip makeup and eye makeup products including mascara, which was further improved in 2005.
The Company also sells Almay Nearly Naked Foundation in a touch-pad for a light, weightless feel, as
well as the Bright Eyes franchises, mascara and eyeliner, for bigger, brighter-looking eyes. In 2004, the
Company introduced Almay Whipped Gloss for a shine that nourishes lips. In 2005, Truly Lasting
Lipcolor was introduced, providing a long-wearing beneﬁt to consumers. The Almay Intense i-color
collection was also introduced in 2005 — designed to appeal to the consumers’ desire for simplicity, it
provides color-coordinated shades of shadow, liner and mascara for each eye color.

Hair: The Company sells both haircare and haircolor products throughout the world. In the US, the
Company’s Colorsilk brand was among the fastest growing haircolor brands in the mass-market
distribution channel in 2004. The Company also markets High Dimension haircolor, the ﬁrst and only
permanent haircolor that works in 10 minutes, as well as its Frost & Glow highlighting brand. In haircare,
the Company sells the Flex and Aquamarine lines in many countries and the Bozzano and Juvena brands
in Brazil.

Beauty Tools: The Company sells Revlon Beauty Tools, which include nail and eye grooming tools,
such as clippers, scissors, ﬁles, tweezers and eye lash curlers. Revlon Beauty Tools are sold individually
and in sets under the Revlon brand name and are the number one brand of beauty tools in the U.S.
mass-market distribution channel. In 2004, Revlon introduced a new line of pedicure products, as well as
2 new kits designed especially for traveling. In 2005, Revlon introduced 14 new Beauty Tool products,
including a new line called Expert Effects which have been designed ergonomically to enable proper
technique for expert-like results.

Fragrances: The Company sells a selection of moderately-priced and premium-priced fragrances,
including perfumes, eau de toilettes, colognes and body sprays. The Company’s portfolio includes
fragrances such as Charlie and Ciara as well as Jean Naté.

Anti-perspirants/deodorants:

In the area of anti-perspirants and deodorants, the Company markets
Mitchum and Hi & Dri antiperspirant brands in many countries. The Company also markets hypo-
allergenic personal care products, including antiperspirants, under the Almay brand.

Skin: The Company’s skin care products, including moisturizers, are sold under brand names
including Eterna 27, Vitamin C Absolutes, Almay Kinetin, Almay Milk Plus and Ultima II. In addition,
the Company sells skin care products in international markets under internationally-recognized brand
names and under various regional brands, including the Company’s premium-priced Jeanne Gatineau
brand, as well as Ultima II.

Marketing

The Company markets extensive consumer product lines at a range of retail prices primarily through
the mass-market distribution channel and outside the U.S. also markets select premium lines through
demonstrator-assisted channels.

The Company uses print and television advertising and point-of-sale merchandising, including
displays and samples. The Company’s marketing emphasizes a uniform global image and product for its
portfolio of core brands, including Revlon, ColorStay, Revlon Age Defying, Almay, Charlie and Mitchum.
The Company coordinates advertising campaigns with in-store promotional and other marketing
activities. The Company develops jointly with retailers carefully tailored advertising, point-of-purchase
and other focused marketing programs. The Company uses network and spot television advertising,
national cable advertising and print advertising in major general interest, women’s fashion and women’s
service magazines, as well as coupons and other trial incentives. In 2004, the Company expanded its media
reach utilizing ‘‘ non-traditional’’ vehicles such as outdoor, newspapers and movie theaters to supplement
the media mix.

The Company also uses cooperative advertising programs with some retailers, supported by
Company-paid or Company-subsidized demonstrators, and coordinated in-store promotions and displays.
These displays include ‘‘Revlon Reports,’’ which highlight seasonal and other fashion and color trends,
describe the Company’s products that address those trends and can include coupons, rebate offers and
other promotional material to encourage consumers to try the Company’s products. Other marketing
materials designed to introduce the Company’s newest products to consumers and encourage trial and
purchase in-store include trial-size products and couponing. Additionally, the Company maintains
separate websites, www.revlon.com and www.almay.com devoted to the Revlon and Almay brands,
respectively. Each of these websites feature current product and promotional information for the Revlon
and Almay brands, respectively, and are updated regularly to stay current with the Company’s new
product launches and other advertising and promotional campaigns.

New Product Development and Research and Development

The Company believes that it is an industry leader in the development of innovative and
technologically-advanced consumer products. The Company’s marketing and research and development
groups identify consumer needs and shifts in consumer preferences in order to develop new products,
tailor line extensions and promotions and redesign or reformulate existing products to satisfy such needs
or preferences. The Company’s research and development group comprises departments specialized in
the technologies critical to the Company’s various product categories, as well as an advanced technology
department that promotes inter-departmental, cross-functional research on a wide range of technologies
to develop new and innovative products. In connection with the implementation of the stabilization and
growth phase of the Company’s plan, the Company has developed and is implementing a new
cross-functional product development process intended to optimize the Company’s ability to bring to
market its new product offerings and to ensure that the Company has products in key trend categories.

The Company operates an extensive cosmetics research and development facility in Edison, New
Jersey. The scientists at the Edison facility are responsible for all of the Company’s new product research
worldwide, performing research for new products, ideas, concepts and packaging. The research and
development group at the Edison facility also performs extensive safety and quality tests on the
Company’s products, including toxicology, microbiology and package testing. Additionally, quality control
testing is performed at each manufacturing facility.

As of December 31, 2004, the Company employed approximately 180 people in its research and
development activities, including specialists in pharmacology, toxicology, chemistry, microbiology, engi-
neering, biology, dermatology and quality control. In 2004, 2003 and 2002, the Company spent
approximately $24.0, $25.4 and $23.3, respectively, on research and development activities.

Manufacturing and Related Operations and Raw Materials

During 2004, cosmetics and/or personal care products were produced at the Company’s facilities in
Oxford, North Carolina, Irvington, New Jersey, Venezuela, France, South Africa, China and Mexico and
at third-party owned facilities around the world, with the largest third-party manufacturer located in
Maesteg, Wales. On September 22, 2004, the Company exercised its contractual rights to terminate its
2002 supply agreement with Creative Outsourcing Solutions International Limited (‘‘COSi’’) that is
currently scheduled to become effective on June 30, 2005. The Company intends to transition such
manufacturing primarily to its Oxford North Carolina facility and distribution and warehousing to a local
U.K.-based third party and does not currently expect any disruption in its supply chain. The Company
continually reviews its manufacturing needs against its manufacturing capacity to identify opportunities
to reduce costs and operate more efﬁciently. The Company purchases raw materials and components
throughout the world. The Company continuously pursues reductions in cost of goods through the global
sourcing of raw materials and components from qualiﬁed vendors, utilizing its large purchasing capacity
to maximize cost savings. The global sourcing of raw materials and components from accredited vendors
also ensures the quality of the raw materials and components. The Company believes that alternate
sources of raw materials and components exist and does not anticipate any signiﬁcant shortages of, or
difﬁculty in obtaining, such materials.

Distribution

The Company’s products are sold in more than 100 countries across six continents. The Company’s
worldwide sales force had approximately 330 people as of December 31, 2004, including a dedicated sales
force for cosmetics, skin care, fragrance and personal care products in the mass-market distribution
channel in the U.S. In addition, the Company utilizes sales representatives and independent distributors
to serve specialized markets and related distribution channels.

United States and Canada. Net sales in the U.S. and Canada accounted for approximately 66% of
the Company’s 2004 net sales, a majority of which were made in the mass-market distribution channel.
The Company also sells a broad range of consumer products to U.S. Government military exchanges and
commissaries. The Company licenses its trademarks to select manufacturers for products that the
Company believes have the potential to extend the Company’s brand names and image. As of
December 31, 2004, ten (10) licenses were in effect relating to sixteen (16) product categories to be
marketed principally in the mass-market distribution channel. Pursuant to such licenses, the Company
retains strict control over product design and development, product quality, advertising and use of its
trademarks. These licensing arrangements offer opportunities for the Company to generate revenues and
cash ﬂow through royalties and renewal fees, some of which have been prepaid.

As part of its strategy to increase consumption of the Company’s products at retail, the Company has
enhanced and focused coverage by retail merchandisers who stock and maintain the Company’s
point-of-sale wall displays intended to ensure that high-selling SKUs are in stock and to ensure the
optimal presentation of the Company’s products in retail outlets. Additionally, the Company has
upgraded the technology available to its sales force to provide real-time information regarding inventory
levels and other relevant information.

International. Net sales outside the U.S. and Canada accounted for approximately 34% of the
Company’s 2004 net sales. The ten largest countries in terms of these sales, which include South Africa,
Australia, U.K., Japan, Hong Kong, Mexico, Brazil, France, Italy and Venezuela, accounted for
approximately 26% of the Company’s net sales in 2004. The Company distributes its products through
drug stores/chemists, hypermarkets/mass volume retailers and variety stores. The Company also
distributes outside the U.S. through department stores and specialty stores such as perfumeries. At
December 31, 2004, the Company actively sold its products through wholly-owned subsidiaries estab-
lished in 16 countries outside of the U.S. and through a large number of distributors and licensees
elsewhere around the world.

Customers

The Company’s principal customers include large mass volume retailers and chain drug stores,
including such well-known retailers as Wal-Mart, Target, Kmart, Walgreens, Rite Aid, CVS, Eckerd,
Albertsons Drugs and Longs in the U.S., Boots in the United Kingdom, Watsons in the Far East and
Wal-Mart internationally. Wal-Mart and its afﬁliates worldwide accounted for approximately 21.0% of the
Company’s 2004 consolidated net sales. The Company expects that Wal-Mart and a small number of other
customers will, in the aggregate, continue to account for a large portion of the Company’s net sales.
Although the loss of Wal-Mart or one or more of the Company’s other customers that may account for
a signiﬁcant portion of the Company’s sales, or any signiﬁcant decrease in sales to these customers or any
signiﬁcant decrease in retail display space in any of these customers’ stores, could have a material adverse
effect on the Company’s business, ﬁnancial condition or results of operations, the Company has no reason
to believe that any such loss of customers or decrease in sales will occur.

Competition

The consumer products business is highly competitive. The Company competes primarily on the basis
of: developing quality products with innovative performance features; shades, ﬁnishes and packaging;
educating consumers on our product beneﬁts; anticipating and responding to changing consumer demands
in a timely manner, including the timing of new product introductions and line extensions; offering
attractively priced products; maintaining favorable brand recognition; generating competitive margins
and inventory turns for its retail customers by providing market-right products and executing effective
pricing, incentive and promotion programs; ensuring product availability through effective planning and
replenishment collaboration with retailers; providing strong and effective advertising, marketing,
promotion and merchandising support; maintaining an effective sales force; and obtaining sufﬁcient retail
ﬂoor space, optimal in-store positioning and effective presentation of its products at retail. The Company
experienced declines in its market share in the U.S. mass-market in color cosmetics from the end of the
ﬁrst half of 1998 through the ﬁrst half of 2002, including a decline in its color cosmetics market share from
32.0% in the second quarter of 1998 to 22.3% in the second quarter of 2002. From the second half of 2002
through the end of 2003, the Company’s market share stabilized, achieving a 22.3% market share for 2003.
For 2004, the Revlon and Almay brands combined held U.S. mass-market share of 21.5%, compared with
22.3% for 2003. The Company competes in selected product categories against a number of multinational
manufacturers, some of which are larger and have substantially greater resources than the Company, and
which may therefore have the ability to spend more aggressively on advertising and marketing and have
more ﬂexibility than the Company to respond to changing business and economic conditions. In addition
to products sold in the mass-market and demonstrator-assisted channels, the Company’s products also
compete with similar products sold in prestige department store channels, door-to-door or through
mail-order or telemarketing by representatives of direct sales companies. The Company’s principal
competitors include L’Oréal S.A., The Procter & Gamble Company and The Estée Lauder Companies
Inc.

Patents, Trademarks and Proprietary Technology

The Company’s major trademarks are registered in the U.S. and in well over 100 other countries, and
the Company considers trademark protection to be very important to its business. Signiﬁcant trademarks
include Revlon, ColorStay, Revlon Age Defying, Skinlights, High Dimension, Frost & Glow, Illuminance,
Cutex (outside the U.S.), Mitchum, Eterna 27, Almay, Almay Kinetin, Ultima II, Flex, Charlie, Jean Naté,
Moon Drops, Super Lustrous and Colorsilk.

The Company utilizes certain proprietary, patent pending or patented technologies in the formula-
tion or manufacture of a number of the Company’s products, including ColorStay cosmetics, classic
Revlon nail enamel, Skinlights skin brightener, High Dimension hair color, Super Top Speed nail enamel,
Revlon Age Defying foundation and cosmetics, New Complexion makeup, Time-Off makeup, Amazing
Lasting cosmetics, and Almay One Coat cosmetics. The Company also protects certain of its packaging
and component concepts through design patents. The Company considers its proprietary technology and
patent protection to be important to its business.

Government Regulation

The Company is subject to regulation by the Federal Trade Commission (the ‘‘FTC’’) and the Food
and Drug Administration (the ‘‘FDA’’) in the United States, as well as various other federal, state, local
and foreign regulatory authorities, including the European Commission in the European Union (‘‘EU’’).
The Oxford, North Carolina manufacturing facility is registered with the FDA as a drug manufacturing
establishment, permitting the manufacture of cosmetics that contain over-the-counter drug ingredients,
such as sunscreens and antiperspirants. Compliance with federal, state, local and foreign laws and
regulations pertaining to discharge of materials into the environment, or otherwise relating to the
protection of the environment, has not had, and is not anticipated to have, a material effect upon the
Company’s capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position. State and local regulations in the U.S.
and regulations in the EU that are designed to protect consumers or the environment have an increasing
inﬂuence on the Company’s product claims, contents and packaging.

Industry Segments, Foreign and Domestic Operations

The Company operates in a single segment. Certain geographic, ﬁnancial and other information of
the Company is set forth in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Note 19 of the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company.

Employees

As of December 31, 2004, the Company employed approximately 6,300 people. As of December 31,
2004, approximately 150 of such employees in the U.S. were covered by collective bargaining agreements.
The Company believes that its employee relations are satisfactory. Although the Company has
experienced minor work stoppages of limited duration in the past in the ordinary course of business, such
work stoppages have not had a material effect on the Company’s results of operations or ﬁnancial
condition.

Item 2. Properties

The following table sets forth as of December 31, 2004 the Company’s major manufacturing, research

and warehouse/distribution facilities, all of which are owned except where otherwise noted.

Location

Use

Oxford, North Carolina . . . . . . Manufacturing, warehousing, distribution and ofﬁce (a)
Edison, New Jersey . . . . . . . . . . Research and ofﬁce (leased)
Irvington, New Jersey. . . . . . . . . Manufacturing, warehousing and ofﬁce (a)
Mexico City, Mexico . . . . . . . . . Manufacturing, distribution and ofﬁce
Caracas, Venezuela. . . . . . . . . . . Manufacturing, distribution and ofﬁce
Kempton Park, South Africa . . Warehousing, distribution and ofﬁce (leased) (b)
Canberra, Australia . . . . . . . . . . Warehousing, distribution and ofﬁce (leased)
Isando, South Africa . . . . . . . . . Manufacturing, warehousing, distribution and ofﬁce

Approximate
Floor
Space Sq. Ft.

1,012,000
123,000
96,000
150,000
145,000
127,000
125,000
94,000

(a) Properties subject to liens under the 2004 Credit Agreement.

(b) The Kempton Park, South Africa lease terminated on February 28, 2005 and a new lease was entered into for 120,000 sq. ft.

in Isando, South Africa. At December 31, 2004, this new facility was not operational, but it is now operational.

In addition to the facilities described above, the Company owns and leases additional facilities in
various areas throughout the world, including the lease for the Company’s executive ofﬁces in New York,
New York (approximately 176,749 square feet, of which approximately 5,900 square feet was sublet to the
Company’s afﬁliates as of December 31, 2004). Management considers the Company’s facilities to be
well-maintained and satisfactory for the Company’s operations, and believes that the Company’s facilities
and third party contractual supplier arrangements provide sufﬁcient capacity for its current and expected
production requirements.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

The Company is involved in various routine legal proceedings incident to the ordinary course of its
business. The Company believes that the outcome of all pending legal proceedings in the aggregate is
unlikely to have a material adverse effect on the business or consolidated ﬁnancial condition of the
Company. A purported class action lawsuit was ﬁled on September 27, 2000, in the United States District
Court for the Southern District of New York on behalf of Dan Gavish, Tricia Fontan and Walter Fontan
individually and allegedly on behalf of all others similarly situated who purchased the securities of Revlon,
Inc. and REV Holdings Inc. (a Delaware corporation and the predecessor of REV Holdings LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company (‘‘REV Holdings’’)) between October 2, 1998 and September 30, 1999
(the ‘‘Second Gavish Action’’). The complaint, amended by the plaintiffs in November 2001, alleged,
among other things, that Revlon, Inc., certain of its present and former ofﬁcers and directors and REV
Holdings Inc. violated, among other things, Rule 10b-5 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the ‘‘Exchange Act’’). On September 29, 2004, the United States District Court for the
Southern District of New York dismissed the Second Gavish Action, without prejudice. Revlon, Inc.’s
counsel has subsequently received a second amended complaint. If this matter is pursued, Revlon, Inc.
intends to defend it vigorously as the Company believes it is without merit. In light of the settlement of
the defendants’ insurance claim for this matter and the other purported class actions ﬁled in 1999 and
settled in June 2003, which the Company recorded in the fourth quarter of 2002, the Company does not
expect to incur any further expense in this matter.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

No matter was submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of the ﬁscal year

covered by this report.

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases

of Equity Securities

MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, which is wholly owned by Ronald O. Perelman, owns (i) 190,110,641
shares of Class A Common Stock (20,819,333 of which are owned by REV Holdings and 169,291,308 of
which are beneﬁcially owned by MacAndrews & Forbes) and (ii) all of the outstanding 31,250,000 shares
of Class B Common Stock of Revlon, Inc., with a par value of $0.01 per share (‘‘Class B Common Stock’’,
and together with the Class A Common Stock, the ‘‘Common Stock’’). Based on the shares referenced in
clauses (i) and (ii) above, and including Mr. Perelman’s vested stock options discussed in Part III, Item 12.
(Security Ownership of Certain Beneﬁcial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters)
of this Form 10-K, Mr. Perelman, directly and indirectly, through MacAndrews & Forbes, at December
31, 2004, beneﬁcially owned approximately 59.9% of Revlon, Inc.’s outstanding shares of Common Stock
and had approximately 77.2% of the combined voting power of the outstanding shares of Revlon, Inc.’s
Common Stock currently entitled to vote at its 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The remaining
148,757,303 shares of Revlon, Inc.’s Class A Common Stock outstanding at December 31, 2004 were
owned by the public. Revlon, Inc.’s Class A Common Stock is listed and traded on the New York Stock
Exchange (the ‘‘NYSE’’). As of December 31, 2004, there were 918 holders of record of Revlon, Inc.’s
Class A Common Stock. No dividends were declared or paid during 2004 or 2003 by Revlon, Inc. on its
Common Stock. The terms of the 2004 Credit Agreement, the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes
Line of Credit (each as hereinafter deﬁned), the 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes, the 81⁄8% Senior Notes
and the 9% Senior Notes (as each such series of notes is hereinafter deﬁned) currently restrict the ability
of Products Corporation to pay dividends or make distributions to Revlon, Inc., except in limited
circumstances. See Part III, Item 12. (Security Ownership of Certain Beneﬁcial Owners and Management
and Related Stockholder Matters) and the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company and the
Notes thereto.

The table below shows the Company’s high and low quarterly stock prices of Revlon, Inc.’s Class A

Common Stock on the NYSE for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003.

High. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Low . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1st
Quarter

$3.66
2.28

1st
Quarter

$3.54
2.40

2004 Quarterly Stock Prices(1)

2nd
Quarter

$3.50
2.70

3rd
Quarter

$2.94
2.11

2003 Quarterly Stock Prices(1)

2nd
Quarter

$3.67
2.62

3rd
Quarter

$3.70
2.66

4th
Quarter

$2.55
2.06

4th
Quarter

$2.96
2.20

(1) Represents the closing price per share of Revlon, Inc.’s Class A Common Stock on the NYSE, the exchange on which such

shares are listed. The Company’s stock trading symbol is ‘‘REV’’.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

The Consolidated Statements of Operations Data for each of the years in the ﬁve-year period ended
December 31, 2004 and the Balance Sheet Data as of December 31, 2004, 2003, 2002, 2001 and 2000 are
derived from the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company, which have been audited by
KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting ﬁrm. The Selected Consolidated Financial Data
should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes to
the Consolidated Financial Statements and ‘‘Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.’’

Statements of Operations Data (a):
Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross proﬁt (b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Selling, general and administrative expenses . .
Restructuring costs and other, net (c) . . . . . . . .
Operating income (loss ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loss on early extinguishment of debt . . . . . . . .
Loss from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . .

Basic and diluted loss from continuing

2004

$1,297.2
811.9
717.6
5.8
88.5
130.8

90.7(f)

(142.5)

Year Ended December 31,
2002 (d)
(dollars in millions, except per share amounts)

2003 (d)

2001

2000

$1,299.3
798.2
770.9
6.0
21.3
174.5
—
(153.8)

$1,119.4
615.7
717.0
13.6
(114.9)
159.0
—
(286.5)

$1,277.6
733.4
679.2
38.1
16.1
140.5
3.6
(153.7)

$1,409.4
835.1
765.1
54.1
15.9
144.5
—
(129.7)

operations per common share . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ (0.47)

$ (2.47)

$ (5.36)

$ (2.87)

$ (2.43)

Weighted average number of common shares

outstanding (in millions): (e)

Basic and diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

301.1

62.3

53.5

53.4

2004

2003

December 31,
2002
(dollars in millions)

2001

2000

Balance Sheet Data (a):
Total assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total indebtedness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total stockholders ’ deﬁciency . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 1,000.5
1,355.3
(1,019.9)

892.2
1,897.5
(1,725.6)

933.7
1,775.1
(1,638.5)

997.6
1,661.1
(1,282.1)

$ 1,101.8
1,593.8
(1,106.7)

(a)

(b)

(c)

In July 2001, the Company completed the disposition of the Colorama brand and facility in Brazil. In March and May 2000,
the Company completed the dispositions of its worldwide professional products line and the Plusbelle brand in Argentina,
respectively. Accordingly, the selected ﬁnancial data includes the results of operations of the professional products line,
Plusbelle and Colorama brands through the dates of disposition.

In connection with the Company’s restructuring activities described in note (c) below, from 2000 to 2002 the Company incurred
additional costs associated with the consolidation of its Phoenix and Canada facilities and its worldwide operations. The
Company recorded $1.5, $38.2 and $4.9 of such costs for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively, in
cost of sales.

In 2000, the Company initiated a new restructuring program, in line with its original restructuring plan developed in late 1998,
designed to improve proﬁtability by reducing personnel and consolidating manufacturing facilities. The 2000 restructuring
program focused on closing manufacturing operations in Phoenix, Arizona and Mississauga, Canada and consolidating
production into the Company’s plant in Oxford, North Carolina. The 2000 restructuring program also included the remaining
obligation for excess leased real estate at the Company’s headquarters, consolidation costs associated with closing the
Company’s facility in New Zealand and the elimination of several domestic and international executive and operational
positions, each of which was effected to reduce and streamline corporate overhead costs. Restructuring expenses incurred
between 2000 and 2004 were with respect to the 2000 restructuring program, the continued consolidation of the Company’s
worldwide operations or one-time restructuring events including employee severance costs.

(d) Results for 2003 and 2002 include expenses of approximately $31.0 in 2003 and approximately $104.0 in 2002 related to the

acceleration of the implementation of the stabilization and growth phase of the Company’s plan.

(e) Represents the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Upon consummation of the 2003
Rights Offering (as hereinafter deﬁned), the fair value, based on NYSE closing price of Revlon, Inc.’s Class A Common Stock
was more than the subscription price. Accordingly, basic and diluted loss per common share have been restated for all periods
prior to the 2003 Rights Offering to reﬂect the stock dividend of 1,262,328 shares of Revlon, Inc.’s Class A Common Stock (See
Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). On March 25, 2004, in connection with the Revlon Exchange Transactions
(as hereinafter deﬁned), the Company issued 299,969,493 shares of Class A Common Stock (See Note 9 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements). The shares issued in the Revlon Exchange Transactions are included in the weighted average number
of shares outstanding since the date of the respective transactions.

(f) Represents the loss on the exchange of equity for certain indebtedness in the Revlon Exchange Transactions (as hereinafter
deﬁned) and fees, expenses, premiums and the write-off of deferred ﬁnancing costs related to the Revlon Exchange
Transactions, the tender for and redemption of the 12% Senior Secured Notes (including the applicable premium) (as
hereinafter deﬁned) and the repayment of the 2001 Credit Agreement (as hereinafter deﬁned). (See Note 9 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements).

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

(dollars in millions, except per share data)

Overview

The Company is providing this overview in accordance with the SEC’s December 2003 interpretive
guidance regarding Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.

The Company operates in a single segment and manufactures, markets and sells an extensive array
of cosmetics and skin care, fragrances and personal care products. In addition, the Company has a
licensing group.

The Company has accelerated the implementation of its three-part plan to rationalize costs and to
grow the business. In 2002, the Company began the implementation of the stabilization and growth phase
of its plan.

The Company intends to capitalize on the actions taken during the stabilization and growth phase of
its plan, with the objective of increasing revenues and achieving proﬁtability over the long term. The
Company currently anticipates that the continued growth momentum and accelerated growth stage of its
plan will include various actions that represent reﬁnements of and additions to the actions taken during
the stabilization and growth phase of its plan, with the objective of balancing top-line growth with
improved operating margins and developing and implementing the Company’s productivity initiatives.
These ongoing initiatives include, among other things, actions to: (i) further improve the new product
development and introduction process; (ii) continue to increase the effectiveness and reduce the cost of
the Company’s display walls; (iii) drive efﬁciencies across the Company’s overall supply chain, including
reducing manufacturing costs by streamlining components and sourcing strategically and rationalizing its
supply chain in Europe, which will include moving certain production for the European markets to the
Company’s Oxford, North Carolina facility (the Company intends to transition such manufacturing
primarily to one or more of its other facilities and does not currently expect any disruption in its supply
chain) and entering into new warehousing and distribution arrangements in the U.K.; and (iv) optimize
the effectiveness of the Company’s advertising, marketing and promotions. This stage will also include
strengthening the Company’s balance sheet and capital structure, much of which, as discussed in Note 9
to the Consolidated Financial Statements, has been accomplished during 2004.

The Company believes that it has strengthened its organizational capability and it intends to continue
doing so. The Company also believes that it has strengthened its relationships with its key retailers in the
U.S., which has led to space gains and increased distribution in 2004 for certain of the Company’s
products.

On July 9, 2004, Products Corporation entered into the 2004 Credit Agreement and during July and
August 2004 used the proceeds of borrowings under the 2004 Credit Agreement to repay in full the $290.5
of outstanding indebtedness (including accrued interest) under Products Corporation’s 2001 Credit
Agreement, to purchase and redeem all $363 aggregate principal amount of Products Corporation’s 12%
Senior Secured Notes, and to pay fees and expenses incurred in connection with the 2004 Credit
Agreement, the Tender Offer and the Revlon Exchange Transactions, including the payment of expenses
related to a reﬁnancing that Products Corporation launched in May 2004 but did not consummate. The
balance of such proceeds in connection with the Term Loan Facility were available to Products
Corporation for general corporate purposes.

On March 25, 2004 Revlon, Inc. consummated the Revlon Exchange Transactions and reduced
Products Corporation’s debt by approximately $804 as of that date. Revlon, Inc. issued an additional
299,969,493 shares of Class A Common Stock and as of December 31, 2004 Revlon, Inc. had outstanding
approximately 338,867,944 shares of Class A Common Stock and 31,250,000 shares of Class B Common
Stock. MacAndrews & Forbes beneﬁcially owned approximately 221.4 million shares of the Common
Stock (representing approximately 59.9% of the outstanding shares of the Common Stock and
approximately 77.2% of the combined voting power of the Common Stock) as of December 31, 2004. (See
Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

Net sales in 2004 decreased $2.1 to $1,297.2, as compared to $1,299.3 in 2003, driven by higher total
returns, allowances and discounts, partially offset by favorable foreign currency translation and higher
shipments, as well as the prepayment of certain minimum royalties and renewal fees by licensees.

In the United States and Canada, 2004 net sales decreased $34.9 to $855.7 from $890.6 in 2003. The
decrease in 2004 was due to higher total returns, allowances and discounts which were due in part to a
higher returns provision for product discontinuances identiﬁed in 2004, higher returns from promotions,
and the fact that the 2003 provision for returns beneﬁted from a revision of previous estimates for returns
associated with the Company’s accelerated growth plan which were recorded in 2002, partially offset by
higher shipments and an increase in licensing revenue from prepayments of certain minimum royalties
and renewal fees by licensees of $11.8 in 2004 versus $5.3 in 2003. In International, in 2004, net sales
increased $32.8 to $441.5 from $408.7 in 2003. The increase in 2004 was due primarily to favorable foreign
currency translation.

In terms of U.S. marketplace performance, the U.S. color cosmetics category for 2004 declined
approximately 2.5% versus 2003. For 2004, the Revlon and Almay brands combined held U.S.
mass-market share of 21.5%, compared with 22.3% for 2003. Market share performance of existing
products under the Revlon and Almay brands increased from 2003 to 2004, offset in part by decreased
market share performance of new products under such brands. In hair color and beauty tools, the
Company gained market share in 2004, compared with 2003, increasing, respectively, from a 6.5% market
share for 2003 to 7.1% for 2004 and 22.6% market share for 2003 to 24.5% for 2004, while market share
was down for anti-perspirants/deodorants, decreasing from 6.3% in 2003 to 6.1% in 2004.

Net sales in the Company’s domestic and international operations in the normal course are subject
to the risk of being adversely affected by, among other things, one or more of the following: weak
economic conditions, category weakness, political uncertainties, military actions, terrorist activities,
adverse currency ﬂuctuations, competitive activities and changes in consumer purchasing habits, including
with respect to shopping channels.

Operating income in 2004 increased $67.2 to $88.5, as compared to $21.3 in 2003. The improvement
in 2004 reﬂected the absence of growth plan charges (which decreased operating income in 2003 by
approximately $31.2), the aforementioned higher licensing revenues (which included prepayments of
minimum royalties and renewal fees by licensees of $11.8 in 2004 versus $5.3 in 2003) and lower
advertising, partially offset by higher total returns, allowances and discounts and favorable foreign
currency translation.

The $90.7 loss on early extinguishment of debt for 2004 represents the loss on the exchange of equity
for certain indebtedness in the Revlon Exchange Transactions (such loss was equal to the difference
between the fair value of the equity securities issued and the book value of the related indebtedness
exchanged by third parties other than MacAndrews & Forbes or related parties) and fees, expenses and
the write-off of deferred ﬁnancing costs related to the Revlon Exchange Transactions, the tender for and
redemption of the 12% Senior Secured Notes (including the applicable premium) and the repayment of
the 2001 Credit Agreement. (See Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

Discussion of Critical Accounting Policies

In the ordinary course of its business, the Company has made a number of estimates and assumptions
relating to the reporting of results of operations and ﬁnancial condition in the preparation of its ﬁnancial
statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. Actual results could
differ signiﬁcantly from those estimates and assumptions. The Company believes that the following
discussion addresses the Company’s most critical accounting policies, which are those that are most
important to the portrayal of the Company’s ﬁnancial condition and results and require management’s
most difﬁcult, subjective and complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about
the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain.

Sales Returns:

The Company allows customers to return their unsold products when they meet certain Company-
established criteria as outlined in the Company’s trade terms. The Company regularly reviews and revises,
when deemed necessary, its estimates of sales returns based primarily upon actual returns, planned
product discontinuances, and promotional sales, which would permit customers to return items based
upon the Company’s trade terms. The Company records estimated sales returns as a reduction to sales and
cost of sales, and an increase in accrued liabilities and inventories. Returned products which are recorded
as inventories are valued based upon the amount that the Company expects to realize upon their
subsequent disposition. The physical condition and marketability of the returned products are the major
factors considered by the Company in estimating realizable value. Cost of sales includes the cost of
refurbishment of returned products. Actual returns, as well as realized values on returned products, may
differ signiﬁcantly, either favorably or unfavorably, from the Company’s estimates if factors such as
product discontinuances, customer inventory levels or competitive conditions differ from the Company’s
estimates and expectations and, in the case of actual returns, if economic conditions differ signiﬁcantly
from the Company’s estimates and expectations.

Trade Support Costs:

In order to support the retail trade, the Company has various performance-based arrangements with
retailers to reimburse them for all or a portion of their promotional activities related to the Company’s
products. The Company regularly reviews and revises, when deemed necessary, estimates of costs to the
Company for these promotions based on estimates of what has been incurred by the retailers. Actual costs
incurred by the Company may differ signiﬁcantly if factors such as the level and success of the retailers’
programs, as well as retailer participation levels, differ from the Company’s estimates and expectations.

Inventories:

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market value. Cost is principally determined by the
ﬁrst-in, ﬁrst-out method. The Company records adjustments to the value of inventory based upon its
forecasted plans to sell its inventories, as well as planned discontinuances. The physical condition (e.g.,
age and quality) of the inventories is also considered in establishing its valuation. These adjustments are
estimates, which could vary signiﬁcantly, either favorably or unfavorably, from the amounts that the
Company may ultimately realize upon the disposition of inventories if future economic conditions,
customer inventory levels, product discontinuances, return levels or competitive conditions differ from
the Company’s estimates and expectations.

Property, Plant and Equipment and Other Assets:

Property, plant and equipment is recorded at cost and is depreciated on a straight-line basis over the
estimated useful lives of such assets. Changes in circumstances such as technological advances, changes to
the Company’s business model, changes in the planned use of ﬁxtures or software or closing of facilities
or changes in the Company’s capital strategy can result in the actual useful lives differing from the
Company’s estimates.

Included in other assets are permanent wall displays, which are recorded at cost and amortized on a
straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of such assets. Intangibles other than goodwill are
recorded at cost and amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of such assets.

Long-lived assets, including ﬁxed assets, permanent wall displays and intangibles other than goodwill,
are reviewed by the Company for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that
the carrying amount of any such asset may not be recoverable. If the undiscounted cash ﬂows (excluding
interest) from the use and eventual disposition of the asset is less than the carrying value, the Company
recognizes an impairment loss, measured as the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value
of the asset. The estimate of undiscounted cash ﬂow is based upon, among other things, certain
assumptions about expected future operating performance. The Company’s estimates of undiscounted
cash ﬂow may differ from actual cash ﬂow due to, among other things, technological changes, economic

conditions, changes to its business model or changes in its operating performance. In those cases where
the Company determines that the useful life of other long-lived assets should be shortened, the Company
would depreciate the net book value in excess of the salvage value (after testing for impairment as
described above), over the revised remaining useful life of such asset thereby increasing amortization
expense. Additionally, goodwill is reviewed for impairment at least annually. The Company recognizes an
impairment loss to the extent that carrying value exceeds the fair value of the asset.

Pension Beneﬁts:

The Company sponsors pension and other retirement plans in various forms covering substantially
all employees who meet eligibility requirements. Several statistical and other factors which attempt to
estimate future events are used in calculating the expense and liability related to the plans. These factors
include assumptions about the discount rate, expected return on plan assets and rate of future
compensation increases as determined by the Company, within certain guidelines. In addition, the
Company’s actuarial consultants also use subjective factors such as withdrawal and mortality rates to
estimate these factors. The actuarial assumptions used by the Company may differ materially from actual
results due to changing market and economic conditions, higher or lower withdrawal rates or longer or
shorter life spans of participants, among other things. Differences from these assumptions may result in
a signiﬁcant impact to the amount of pension expense/liability recorded by the Company.

Results of Operations

Year Ended December 31, 2004 compared with the year ended December 31, 2003

In the tables, numbers in parenthesis (

) denote unfavorable variances.

Net sales:

United States and Canada . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
International . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Year Ended December 31,

2004

$ 855.7
441.5

$1,297.2

2003

$ 890.6
408.7

$1,299.3

Dollar
Change

$(34.9)

32.8 (1)

$ (2.1)(2)

Percent
Change

-3.9%
8.0%
-0.2%

(1) Excluding the impact of currency ﬂuctuations, International net sales increased 1.0%.

(2) Excluding the impact of currency ﬂuctuations, consolidated net sales decreased 2.7%.

United States and Canada.

Net sales in the U.S. and Canada decreased $34.9 or 4% in 2004, as compared with 2003, due to higher
total returns, allowances and discounts of approximately $51.0 partially offset by higher shipments of
approximately $3.3, the favorable impact of foreign currency translation of $5.9 and increased licensing
revenue of $6.9, primarily from the prepayments of minimum royalties and renewal fees by licensees of
$11.8 in 2004 versus $5.3 in 2003. The increase in returns, allowances and discounts in 2004 versus 2003
is due in part to higher returns provision for product discontinuances identiﬁed in 2004, higher returns
from promotions, and the fact that the 2003 provision for returns beneﬁted from a revision of previous
estimates for returns associated with the Company’s accelerated growth plan recorded in 2002.

In terms of U.S. marketplace performance, the U.S. color cosmetics category for 2004 declined
approximately 2.5% versus 2003. For 2004, the Revlon and Almay brands combined held U.S.
mass-market share of 21.5%, compared with 22.3% for 2003. Market share performance of existing
products under the Revlon and Almay brands increased from 2003 to 2004, offset in part by decreased
share performance of new products under such brands. In hair color and beauty tools, the Company
gained market share in 2004, compared with 2003, increasing, respectively, from a 6.5% market share for
2003 to 7.1% for 2004 and 22.7% market share for 2003 to 24.5% for 2004, while market share was down
for anti-perspirants/deodorants, decreasing from 6.3% in 2003 to 6.1% in 2004.

International.

Net sales in the Company’s international operations increased $32.8 or 8.0% in 2004, as compared
with 2003. Excluding the impact of foreign currency ﬂuctuations, international sales increased by 1.0% in
2004, as compared to 2003.

In Europe, which is comprised of Europe and the Middle East, net sales decreased by $3.7, or 3.0%,
to $120.6 for 2004, as compared with 2003. Excluding the impact of foreign currency ﬂuctuations, net sales
decreased by $15.1 or 12.2% in 2004, as compared with 2003. The decline in net sales excluding the impact
of foreign currency ﬂuctuations was due to lower sales in the U.K., in part due to reduced customer
inventory levels and higher allowances granted to customers (which the Company estimates contributed
to an approximate 9.4% reduction in net sales in 2004 for the region, as compared with 2003) and lower
sales to distributors in Russia and Germany (which the Company estimates contributed to an approximate
4.3% reduction in net sales in 2004 for the region, as compared with 2003), partially offset by increased
sales in Israel (which the Company estimates contributed to an approximate 1.3% increase in net sales in
2004 for the region, as compared with 2003).

On September 22, 2004, the Company exercised its contractual rights to terminate its 2002 supply
agreement with COSi that is currently scheduled to become effective on June 30, 2005. The Company
intends to transition such manufacturing primarily to its Oxford, North Carolina facility and distribution
and warehousing to a local U.K.-based third party and does not currently expect any disruption in its
supply chain. During 2004, COSi earned approximately $1.9 in performance-based payments. In
December 2004, the Company and COSi entered into a transitional agreement covering the period
through termination pursuant to which, among other things, COSi is eligible to receive $1.9 in additional
performance-based payments if they maintain speciﬁc production service level objectives under the
agreement (however, the Company expects that such payments, if any, will be fully set off against
payments that will become due to the Company from COSi in connection with the cessation of such
arrangement).

In Latin America, which is comprised of Mexico, Central America and South America, net sales
increased by $2.5 or 2.8%, to $94.7 for 2004, as compared with 2003. Excluding the impact of foreign
currency ﬂuctuations, net sales increased by $4.8 or 5.2% in 2004, as compared with 2003. The increase in
net sales excluding the impact of foreign currency ﬂuctuations was primarily due to increased sales in
Brazil, Venezuela and certain distributor markets (which the Company estimates contributed to an
approximate 11.5% increase in net sales for the region in 2004, as compared with 2003) due to improved
local economic and business conditions, partially offset by lower sales in Mexico (which the Company
estimates contributed to an approximate 5.2% reduction in net sales in 2004 for the region, as compared
with 2003).

In the Far East and Africa, net sales increased by $34.0 or 17.7%, to $226.2 for 2004, as compared with
2003. Excluding the impact of foreign currency ﬂuctuations, net sales increased $14.4 or 7.5% for 2004, as
compared with 2003. This increase was driven by higher sales in South Africa and Japan related to
favorable economic conditions (which the Company estimates contributed to an approximate 6.0%
increase in net sales in 2004 for the region, as compared with 2003).

Gross proﬁt:

Gross proﬁt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$811.9

$798.2

Year Ended December 31,
2003
2004

Dollar
Change

$13.7

Excluding foreign exchange ﬂuctuations, gross proﬁt for 2004 decreased $6.3, as compared to 2003,
reﬂecting higher total returns, allowances and discounts, partially offset by higher volumes, the
aforementioned increase in licensing revenue and lower cost of goods sold. Gross proﬁt as a percent of
sales, excluding the impact of foreign exchange, increased to 62.6% in 2004 from 61.4% in 2003 primarily
due to cost savings and the aforementioned higher licensing revenues, partially offset by higher total
returns, allowances and discounts.

SG&A expenses:

SG&A expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$717.6

$770.9

Year Ended December 31,
2003
2004

Dollar
Change

$53.3

SG&A expenses decreased $53.3, or 6.9%, to $717.6 for 2004, as compared to 2003, due primarily to
$36.7 of lower marketing spending and the absence of fees and expenses related to the stabilization and
growth phase of the Company’s plan in 2004 versus $26.1 of expenses in 2003, partially offset by $14.9 of
unfavorable foreign exchange ﬂuctuations.

Restructuring costs:

Restructuring costs and other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$5.8

$6.0

Year Ended December 31,
2003
2004

Dollar
Change

$0.2

The Company recorded $5.8 in 2004 and $6.0 in 2003 for employee severance and other personnel

beneﬁts. The Company expects to save $3.8 annually as a result of the charges taken in 2004.

Other expenses (income):

Interest expense. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$130.8

$174.5

Year Ended December 31,
2003
2004

Dollar
Change

$43.7

The decrease in interest expense of $43.7 for 2004, as compared to 2003, is primarily due to lower
consolidated debt during 2004, resulting from the Revlon Exchange Transactions, partially offset by
higher borrowings under the 2004 Credit Agreement to repay the 2001 Credit Agreement, tender for and
redeem the 12% Senior Secured Notes (including applicable premium and accrued interest) and to pay
fees and expenses. (See Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

Loss on early extinguishment of debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$90.7

$—

Year Ended December 31,
2003
2004

Dollar
Change

$(90.7)

The loss on early extinguishment of debt in 2004 represents the loss on the exchange of equity for
certain indebtedness in the Revlon Exchange Transactions (such loss was equal to the difference between
the fair value of the equity securities issued and the book value of the related indebtedness exchanged by
third parties other than MacAndrews & Forbes or related parties) and fees, expenses and the write-off of
deferred ﬁnancing costs related to the Revlon Exchange Transactions, the tender for and redemption of
the 12% Senior Secured Notes (including the applicable premium) and the repayment of the 2001 Credit
Agreement. (See Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

Miscellaneous, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$2.0

$0.5

Year Ended December 31,
2003
2004

Dollar
Change

$(1.5)

The increase in miscellaneous, net for 2004, as compared to the comparable 2003 period, is primarily
due to fees and expenses associated with the reﬁnancing that Products Corporation launched in May 2004
but did not consummate.

Provision for income taxes:

Provision for income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$9.3

$0.5

Year Ended December 31,
2003
2004

Dollar
Change

$(8.8)

The increase in the provision for income taxes in 2004 is due to higher taxable income in certain
in the 2004 period. Additionally, the 2004 and 2003 periods beneﬁted

markets outside the U.S.
approximately $2.9 and $7.0, respectively, from the favorable resolution of various tax audits.

Year ended December 31, 2003 compared with year ended December 31, 2002

In the tables, numbers in parenthesis ( ), denote unfavorable variances.

Net sales:

United States and Canada . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
International. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Year Ended December 31,

2003

$ 890.6
408.7

$1,299.3

2002

$ 760.1
359.3

$1,119.4

Dollar
Change

$130.5

49.4(1)

$179.9(2)

Percent
Change

17.2%
13.7%
16.1%

(1) Excluding the impact of currency ﬂuctuations, International net sales increased 4.6%.

(2) Excluding the impact of currency ﬂuctuations, consolidated net sales increased 12.6%.

United States and Canada.

The increase in net sales in the U.S. and Canada in 2003 was primarily driven by (1) lower net charges
for sales returns, allowances and discounts of $137.6 in the 2003 period since 2002 included signiﬁcant
amounts of returns due to the growth plan; and to revised estimates of returns based on favorable
experience in 2003 versus 2002 returns estimates; and (2) foreign currency translations beneﬁts, partially
offset by lower licensing revenues of $8.6 in 2003. Market share in the U.S. mass market for color
cosmetics for Almay and Revlon combined increased by 0.3% for the full year 2003 compared with 2002.
These sales and market share gains were achieved in the context of a weaker than expected U.S. mass
market color cosmetics category which, as measured by ACNielsen, declined by 1.9% during 2003.

International.

In Europe, which is comprised of Europe and the Middle East, net sales increased by $16.5, or 15.3%,
to $124.3 for 2003, as compared with 2002. The increase in the European region was primarily due to the
impact of favorable currency ﬂuctuations (which factor the Company estimates contributed to an
approximate 12.2% increase in net sales for the region) and increased sales volume and lower sales returns
in the U.K. and France (which factor the Company estimates contributed to an approximate 6.7% increase
in net sales for the region). Such factors were partially offset by lower sales volume in certain distributor
markets in Russia and Germany, where the Company’s distributors experienced ﬁnancial problems (which
factor the Company estimates contributed to an approximate 3.5% reduction in net sales for the region).

In Latin America, which is comprised of Mexico, Central America and South America, net sales
decreased by $1.9, or 2.0%, to $92.2 for 2003, as compared with 2002. The decrease in the Latin American
region was primarily due to decreased sales volume in Brazil and Mexico, where sales were impacted by
local adverse economic conditions, a decline in the mass retail category and a reduction of customer
inventory levels (which factors the Company estimates contributed to an approximate 10.0% reduction in
net sales for the region) and the impact of adverse currency ﬂuctuations (which factor the Company
estimates contributed to an approximate 9.4% reduction in net sales for the region), which was partially
offset by increased sales volume in Venezuela, Argentina and certain distributor markets (which factor
the Company estimates contributed to an approximate 17.0% increase in net sales for the region).

In the Far East and Africa, net sales increased by $34.8, or 22.1%, to $192.2 for 2003, as compared
with 2002. The increase in the Far East and Africa region was primarily due to the impact of favorable
currency ﬂuctuations (which factor the Company estimates contributed to an approximate 18.0% increase
in net sales for the region) and increased sales volume in South Africa, Japan and China, where the
Company’s products experienced strong demand as a result of favorable general economic conditions and
the effect of strong brand marketing activities (which factors the Company estimates contributed to an
approximate 4.0% increase in net sales for the region), which the Company believes were partially offset
by the economic impact of the SARS outbreak in China.

During 2002, the Company experienced production difﬁculties with COSi, its principal third party
manufacturer for Europe and certain other international markets, which operates the Maesteg facility. To
rectify this situation, on October 31, 2002 Products Corporation and such manufacturer terminated the
long-term supply agreement and entered into a new, more ﬂexible agreement which had signiﬁcantly
reduced volume commitments and, among other things, Products Corporation loaned COSi approxi-
mately $2.0 and COSi was eligible to earn performance-based payments of approximately $6.3 over a
4-year period contingent upon the supplier achieving speciﬁc production service level objectives. During
2003 and 2002, COSi earned approximately $1.8 and $1.6, respectively, in performance-based payments.

Gross proﬁt:

Gross proﬁt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$798.2

$615.7

Year Ended December 31,
2002
2003

Dollar
Change

$182.5

The $182.5 increase in gross proﬁt for 2003, as compared to the comparable 2002 period, is primarily
due to lower sales returns, allowances and discounts of $144.5 in the 2003 period (which includes the
impact of the stabilization and growth phase of the Company’s plan, which began in December 2002) and
higher sales volume of $43.8 (which includes the favorable impact of currency ﬂuctuations). Such
increases in 2003 were partially offset by unfavorable product mix in 2003 and a decrease in licensing and
other revenue of $8.4 in 2003. Gross margins in 2003 improved to 61.4% versus 55.0% in 2002 due to the
previously discussed lower sales returns, allowances and discounts.

SG&A expenses:

SG&A expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$770.9

$717.0

Year Ended December 31,
2002
2003

Dollar
Change

$(53.9)

The increase in SG&A expenses for 2003, as compared to 2002, was primarily due to higher brand
support of $38.7 principally related to the stabilization and growth phase of the Company’s plan, higher
personnel-related expenses and professional fees of $19.2 (including expenses related to the stabilization
and growth phase of the Company’s plan) and rent expense of $2.7, partially offset by lower depreciation
and amortization of $8.9 in the 2003 period due to accelerated amortization of wall displays in 2002 as the
Company transitioned to its new wall displays as part of the stabilization and growth phase of its plan.

Restructuring costs:

Restructuring costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$6.0

$13.6

Year Ended December 31,
2002
2003

Dollar
Change

$7.6

During 2003, the Company recorded a separate charge of $5.9, for employee severance and other

personnel beneﬁts in certain International operations.

and consolidating manufacturing facilities. The 2000 restructuring program focused on the Company’s
plans to close its manufacturing operations in Phoenix, Arizona and Mississauga, Canada and to
consolidate its cosmetics production into its plant in Oxford, North Carolina. The 2000 restructuring
program also includes the remaining obligation for excess leased real estate in the Company’s
headquarters, consolidation costs associated with the Company closing its facility in New Zealand, and the
elimination of several domestic and international executive and operational positions, each of which were
effected to reduce and streamline corporate overhead costs. During 2003 and 2002, the Company
continued to implement the 2000 restructuring program, and recorded charges of $0.1 and $13.6,
respectively, principally for additional employee severance and other personnel beneﬁts, primarily
resulting from reductions in the Company’s worldwide sales force, relocation and other costs related to
the consolidation of the Company’s worldwide operations.

The Company anticipates annualized savings of approximately $12 to $14 relating to the restructuring

charges recorded during 2003.

Other expenses (income):

Interest expense. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$174.5

$159.0

Year Ended December 31,
2002
2003

Dollar
Change

$(15.5)

The increase in interest expense for 2003, as compared to 2002, was primarily due to higher overall
borrowings during 2003, including amounts borrowed under the 2001 Credit Agreement (as hereinafter
deﬁned) and the 2003 MacAndrews & Forbes Loans (as hereinafter deﬁned) and higher interest rates
under the 2001 Credit Agreement as a result of the amendment to the 2001 Credit Agreement in February
2003. (See Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

Provision for income taxes:

Provision for income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$0.5

$4.8

Year Ended December 31,
2002
2003

Dollar
Change

$4.3

The reduction in the provision for income taxes in 2003 was primarily attributable to the resolution
of various tax audits, which reduced tax expense by approximately $7.0, partially offset by higher taxable
income in certain markets outside the United States.

Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources

Net cash used for operating activities was $94.2, $166.4 and $112.3 for 2004, 2003 and 2002,
respectively. This improvement in cash ﬂows in 2004 versus 2003 resulted primarily from higher operating
income, lower purchases of permanent displays, lower accrued expenses and lower cash spending in
connection with the stabilization and growth phase of the Company’s plan and lower interest payments.
The increase in net cash used for operating activities for 2003, compared to 2002, resulted primarily from
a decrease in accrued liabilities mainly associated with the implementation of the various aspects of the
stabilization and growth phase of the Company’s plan and higher spending on displays due to the roll out
of the Company’s reconﬁgured permanent wall displays, partially offset by lower net loss and lower
accounts receivable due to earlier payment terms with many of the Company’s large U.S. customers. The
Company received $11.8, $5.3 and $11.5 in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively, related to prepaid minimum
royalties under a licensing agreements.

Net cash used for investing activities was $18.9, $23.3 and $14.2 for 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
Net cash used for investing activities for 2004 primarily consisted of capital expenditures. Net cash used
for investing activities for 2003 primarily consisted of capital expenditures, partially offset by the proceeds
from the sale of the Company’s warehouse in Canada. Net cash used for investing activities for 2002
primarily consisted of capital expenditures.

Net cash provided by ﬁnancing activities was $174.5, $151.1 and $110.3 for 2004, 2003 and 2002,
respectively. Net cash provided by ﬁnancing activities for 2004 included cash drawn under each of the 2001
Credit Agreement, the 2004 $125 million MacAndrews & Forbes Loan (as hereinafter deﬁned), and the
Term Loan Facility under the 2004 Credit Agreement, partially offset by the repayment of borrowings
under the 2001 Credit Agreement (in connection with the reﬁnancing thereof), the 2004 $125 million
MacAndrews & Forbes Loan, payment of the redemption price, the applicable premium and interest in
connection with the tender for and redemption of Products Corporation’s 12% Senior Secured Notes due
2005 (the ‘‘12% Senior Secured Notes’’) and payment of ﬁnancing costs in connection with certain
amendments to the 2001 Credit Agreement during 2004, the Revlon Exchange Transactions, the 2004
Credit Agreement and the tender for and redemption of the 12% Senior Secured Notes. Net cash
provided by ﬁnancing activities for 2003 included cash drawn under the 2001 Credit Agreement and the
2003 MacAndrews & Forbes Loans (as hereinafter deﬁned) and net proceeds from the 2003 Rights
Offering (as hereinafter deﬁned), partially offset by the repayment of borrowings under the 2001 Credit
Agreement and payment of ﬁnancing costs. Net cash provided by ﬁnancing activities for 2002 included
cash drawn under the 2001 Credit Agreement, partially offset by the repayment of borrowings under the
2001 Credit Agreement and payment of ﬁnancing costs.

At December 31, 2004, Products Corporation had a liquidity position, of approximately $379,
consisting of cash and cash equivalents as well as available borrowings from the Multi-Currency Facility
(as hereinafter deﬁned) under the 2004 Credit Agreement and the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews &
Forbes Line of Credit.

2004 Credit Agreement

On July 9, 2004, Products Corporation entered into a new credit agreement (the ‘‘2004 Credit
Agreement’’) with certain of its subsidiaries as local borrowing subsidiaries, a syndicate of lenders, and
Citicorp USA, Inc., as multi-currency administrative agent, term loan administrative agent and collateral
agent.

The 2004 Credit Agreement provides up to $960.0 and consists of an $800.0 Term Loan Facility (the
‘‘Term Loan Facility’’) and a $160.0 asset-based multi-currency facility (the ‘‘Multi-Currency Facility’’),
the availability under which varies based upon the borrowing base that is determined relative to the value
of eligible accounts receivable, eligible inventory and eligible real property and equipment in the U.S. and
the U.K. from time to time. Products Corporation may request the Multi-Currency Facility to be
increased from time to time in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $50.0 subject to certain
exceptions and subject to the lenders’ agreement. The Multi-Currency Facility is available to: (i) Products
Corporation in revolving credit loans denominated in U.S. dollars, (ii) Products Corporation in swing line
loans denominated in U.S. dollars up to $25.0, (iii) Products Corporation in standby and commercial
letters of credit denominated in U.S. dollars and other currencies up to $50.0 and (iv) Products
Corporation and certain of its international subsidiaries designated from time to time in revolving credit
loans and bankers’ acceptances denominated in U.S. dollars and other currencies, in each case subject to
borrowing base availability. If the value of the eligible assets is not sufﬁcient to support the $160.0
borrowing base, Products Corporation will not have full access to the Multi-Currency Facility. Products
Corporation’s ability to make borrowings under the Multi-Currency Facility is also conditioned upon the
satisfaction of certain conditions precedent and Products Corporation’s compliance with other convenants
in the 2004 Credit Agreement, including a ﬁxed charge coverage ratio that applies when the excess
borrowing base is less than $30.0.

Products Corporation used the $800 of proceeds from borrowings under the Term Loan Facility to
repay in full the $290.5 of outstanding indebtedness (including accrued interest) under Products
Corporation’s credit agreement dated November 30, 2001 and which was scheduled to mature on May 30,
2005 (the ‘‘2001 Credit Agreement’’), to purchase and redeem in July and August 2004 (the ‘‘Tender
Offer’’) all of the $363 aggregate principal amount of the 12% Senior Secured Notes for a purchase price
of approximately $412.3 (including the applicable premium and accrued interest), and to pay fees and
expenses incurred in connection with the 2004 Credit Agreement, the Tender Offer for the 12% Senior
Secured Notes and the Revlon Exchange Transactions, including the payment of expenses related to a
reﬁnancing that Products Corporation launched in May 2004 but did not consummate. The balance of

such proceeds is available to Products Corporation for general corporate purposes. The Multi-Currency
Facility was undrawn at March 1, 2005.

The Multi-Currency Facility will terminate on July 9, 2009 and the loans under the Term Loan
Facility will mature on July 9, 2010; provided that the 2004 Credit Agreement will terminate on October
31, 2005 if the 81⁄8% Senior Notes are not repaid, redeemed, repurchased or defeased in full on or before
such date, on July 31, 2006 if the 9% Senior Notes are not repaid, redeemed, repurchased or defeased in
full on or before such date, and on October 30, 2007 if the 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes are not repaid,
redeemed, repurchased or defeased on or before such date such that not more than $25.0 in aggregate
principal amount of the 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes remain outstanding. In addition, it would be an
event of default under the 2004 Credit Agreement if Revlon, Inc. failed to undertake an approximately
$110.0 equity offering and transfer the net proceeds of such offering to Products Corporation to reduce
Products Corporation’s outstanding indebtedness by March 31, 2006. Although the Company intends to
reﬁnance its 81⁄8% Senior Notes in the ﬁrst quarter of 2005, in the event the Company does not do so, it
could reﬁnance such notes with the proceeds of a debt or equity offering. In order to facilitate any such
reﬁnancing that the Company may pursue through an equity offering, in March 2005, Revlon, Inc. and
MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings amended MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings’ obligation under the 2004
Investment Agreement to backstop a $109.7 equity offering to be conducted by Revlon, Inc. by
accelerating such obligation to October 31, 2005 from March 31, 2006 in the event that Products
Corporation has not as of such date reﬁnanced the 81⁄8% Senior Notes and the Revlon, Inc. conducts an
equity offering to effect such reﬁnancing. (See Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

The 2004 Credit Agreement requires Products Corporation to comply with various ﬁnancial
covenants and restrictions, including covenants and restrictions relating to indebtedness, liens, invest-
ments, mergers and acquisitions, dividends and transactions with afﬁliates of Products Corporation, each
of which is subject to limited exceptions. Additionally, the 2004 Credit Agreement contains ﬁnancial
covenants limiting the senior secured leverage ratio of Products Corporation (the ratio of Products
Corporation’s Senior Secured Debt to EBITDA, as each such term is deﬁned in the 2004 Credit
Agreement) to 5.50 to 1.00 for the four consecutive quarters ending during the period from December 31,
2004 to September 30, 2005; 5.00 to 1.00 for the four consecutive quarters ending during the period from
December 31, 2005 to December 31, 2006; and 4.50 to 1.00 for the four consecutive quarters ending March
31, 2007 and each subsequent quarter until the maturity date of the 2004 Credit Agreement, and, under
circumstances when the excess borrowing base under the Multi-Currency Facility is less than $30.0 for a
period of 30 consecutive days or more, requiring Products Corporation to maintain a consolidated ﬁxed
charge coverage ratio (the ratio of EBITDA minus Capital Expenditures to Cash Interest Expense for
such period, as each such term is deﬁned in the 2004 Credit Agreement) of 1.00 to 1.00.

2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit

On July 9, 2004, Products Corporation and MacAndrews & Forbes Inc. entered into an agreement,
which effective as of August 10, 2004 amended, restated and consolidated the facilities for the
MacAndrews & Forbes $65 million line of credit and the 2004 MacAndrews & Forbes $125 million term
loan (as to which after the Revlon Exchange Transactions the total term loan availability was $87) into
the single 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes line of credit (the ‘‘2004 Consolidated MacAndrews
& Forbes Line of Credit’’) with availability of $152 at March 1, 2005, the commitment under which
reduces to $87 as of July 1, 2005 and terminates on December 1, 2005. Loans are available under the 2004
Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit if (i) the Multi-Currency Facility under the 2004
Credit Agreement has been substantially drawn (after taking into account anticipated needs for Local
Loans and letters of credit), (ii) such borrowing is necessary to cause the excess borrowing base under the
Multi-Currency Facility to remain greater than $30, (iii) additional revolving loans are not available under
the Multi-Currency Facility or (iv) such borrowing is reasonably necessary to prevent or to cure a default
or event of default under the 2004 Credit Agreement. Loans under the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews
& Forbes Line of Credit bear interest (which is not payable in cash but is capitalized quarterly in arrears)
at a rate per annum equal to the lesser of (a) 12.0% and (b) 0.25% less than the rate payable from time
to time on Eurodollar loans under the Term Loan Facility under the 2004 Credit Agreement, which on
March 1, 2005 was 8.59%, provided, that at any time that the Eurodollar Base Rate under the 2004 Credit

Agreement is equal to or greater than 3.0%, the applicable rate to loans under the 2004 Consolidated
MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit will be equal to the lesser of (x) 12.0% and (y) 5.25% over the
Eurodollar Base Rate then in effect. In connection with the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes
Line of Credit, on July 15, 2004, Revlon, Inc., Fidelity Management & Research Company (‘‘Fidelity’’)
and MacAndrews & Forbes agreed to eliminate the Borrowing Limitation (as hereinafter deﬁned).

2004 Debt Reduction Transactions

In February 2004, the Company’s Board of Directors approved agreements with Fidelity and
MacAndrews & Forbes intended to dramatically strengthen the Company’s balance sheet. The decision
to enter into these transactions followed the announcement in December 2003 that the Company’s Board
of Directors had authorized management to begin exploring various alternatives to strengthen the
Company’s balance sheet and increase equity. Certain aspects of the reﬁnancings may be subject to Board
of Director, stockholder, lender, and regulatory approvals.

In March 2004, the Company exchanged approximately $804 of Products Corporation’s debt, $54.6
of Revlon, Inc. Preferred Stock and $9.9 of accrued interest for 299,969,493 shares of Class A Common
Stock (the ‘‘Revlon Exchange Transactions’’). As a result of the Revlon Exchange Transactions, Revlon,
Inc. reduced Products Corporation’s debt by approximately $804 on March 25, 2004. In addition to the
Revlon Exchange Transactions, pursuant to the 2004 Investment Agreement, Revlon, Inc. is committed
to conduct further rights and equity offerings in the amount of approximately $110 by the end of March
2006, the net proceeds of which will be transferred to Products Corporation to reduce its debt (such equity
offerings, together with the Revlon Exchange Transactions, are referred to as the ‘‘Debt Reduction
Transactions’’). The terms of any other equity offerings to be undertaken in connection with the Debt
Reduction Transactions, including the subscription prices, will be determined by Revlon, Inc.’s Board of
Directors at the appropriate times. (See ‘‘Recent Developments’’).

As part of the Revlon Exchange Transactions, MacAndrews & Forbes received Class A Common
Stock in respect of any and all outstanding amounts owing to it, as of the closing date of the Revlon
Exchange Transactions, under the MacAndrews & Forbes $100 term loan (which was approximately
$109.7 at March 25, 2004, including accrued interest), the 2004 MacAndrews & Forbes $125 million term
loan (which was approximately $38.9 at March 25, 2004, including accrued interest) and approximately
$24.1 of subordinated promissory notes. The portions of the 2004 MacAndrews & Forbes $125 million
term loan and the MacAndrews & Forbes $65 million line of credit (which was undrawn) not exchanged
in the Revlon Exchange Transactions remained available to Products Corporation, subject to the
Borrowing Limitation, which was subsequently eliminated. The 2004 MacAndrews & Forbes $125 million
term loan and the MacAndrews & Forbes $65 million line of credit were consolidated into the 2004
Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit in July 2004. (See Note 9 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements).

In another contemporaneous transaction to the Revlon Exchange Transactions, Revlon, Inc. and
Fidelity entered into a stockholders agreement (the ‘‘Stockholders Agreement’’) pursuant to which,
among other things, (i) Revlon, Inc. agreed to continue to maintain a majority of independent directors
(as deﬁned by NYSE listing standards) on its Board of Directors, as it currently does; (ii) Revlon, Inc.
would establish and maintain a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of
Directors, which it formed in March 2004; and (iii) Revlon, Inc. agreed to certain restrictions with respect
to Revlon, Inc.’s conducting any business or entering into any transactions or series of related transactions
with any of its afﬁliates, any holders of 10% or more of the outstanding voting stock or any afﬁliates of
such holders (in each case, other than its subsidiaries). The Stockholders Agreement will terminate at
such time as Fidelity ceases to be the beneﬁcial holder of at least 5% of Revlon, Inc.’s outstanding voting
in February 2004, Products
stock. Also,
Corporation entered into various amendments to its 2001 Credit Agreement that it entered into on
November 30, 2001, one of which added a new $64.4 term loan facility to the 2001 Credit Agreement (the
‘‘Exchange Bank Amendments’’), which agreement was subsequently reﬁnanced in July 2004, as discussed
above.

in conjunction with the Revlon Exchange Transactions,

As a result of the consummation of the Revlon Exchange Transactions, approximately $133.8
principal amount of the 81⁄8% Senior Notes, approximately $174.5 principal amount of the 9% Senior

Notes and approximately $322.9 principal amount of the 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes (collectively,
the ‘‘Revlon Exchange Notes’’) were exchanged for an aggregate of approximately 224.1 million shares of
Class A Common Stock, including such shares issued in exchange for accrued interest on the Revlon
Exchange Notes. Such amount of Revlon Exchange Notes exchanged included approximately $1.0 of the
9% Senior Notes and approximately $286.7 of the 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes tendered by
MacAndrews & Forbes and other entities related to it; and approximately $85.9 of the 9% Senior Notes,
approximately $77.8 of the 81⁄8% Senior Notes and approximately $32.1 of the 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated
Notes tendered by funds and accounts managed by Fidelity.

MacAndrews & Forbes exchanged approximately $109.7 of existing indebtedness (including princi-
pal and accrued interest) under the MacAndrews & Forbes $100 million term loan (as hereinafter
deﬁned) for approximately 43.9 million shares of Class A Common Stock, approximately $38.9 of existing
indebtedness (including principal and accrued interest) under the 2004 MacAndrews & Forbes $125
million term loan for approximately 15.6 million shares of Class A Common Stock and approximately
$24.1of indebtedness under certain subordinated promissory notes payable to MacAndrews & Forbes for
approximately 7.2 million shares of Class A Common Stock. REV Holdings exchanged all of Revlon,
Inc.’s previously outstanding Series A preferred stock for an aggregate of approximately 8.7 million shares
of Class A Common Stock and converted all of its shares of Revlon, Inc.’s previously outstanding Series
B preferred stock into 433,333 shares of Class A Common Stock.

As of December 31, 2004, Revlon, Inc. had outstanding 338,867,944 shares of its Class A Common
Stock and 31.25 million shares of its Class B Common Stock, with MacAndrews & Forbes beneﬁcially
owning as of that date approximately 221.4 million shares of the Common Stock (including approximately
32.6 million shares of the Class A Common Stock beneﬁcially owned by a family member of the
controlling stockholder with respect to which MacAndrews & Forbes holds a voting proxy). Such shares
beneﬁcially owned by MacAndrews & Forbes as of December 31, 2004 represented approximately 59.9%
of the outstanding shares of the Common Stock and approximately 77.2% of the combined voting power
of the Common Stock. Of the shares beneﬁcially owned by MacAndrews & Forbes as of that date, REV
Holdings owned approximately 20.8 million shares of Class A Common Stock and 31.25 million shares of
Class B Common Stock.

In connection with consummating the Revlon Exchange Transactions, Revlon, Inc. announced that
its previously announced plan to launch a rights offering and use the proceeds to reduce debt by a further
$50 by year-end 2004 was reduced to $9.7, as a result of $190.3 of Revlon Exchange Notes having been
exchanged in excess of the Revlon Exchange Notes committed to be exchanged by MacAndrews &
Forbes and Fidelity under their respective support agreements. This $190.3 more than satisﬁed Revlon,
Inc.’s plan to reduce debt through the Revlon Exchange Offers (as hereinafter deﬁned) by $150 in
addition to the Revlon Exchange Notes that were committed to be exchanged in the support agreements
with MacAndrews & Forbes and Fidelity. The $40.3 difference satisﬁed all but $9.7 of the Company’s plan
to reduce debt (in addition to the Revlon Exchange Notes) by a further $50 by year-end 2004. Because
the costs and expenses, as well as the use of organizational resources, associated with a $9.7 rights offering
would have been unduly disproportionate, Revlon, Inc.’s support agreements with MacAndrews & Forbes
and Fidelity and its investment agreement with MacAndrews & Forbes (the ‘‘2004 Investment
Agreement’’) relating to the Company’s debt reduction plan were amended to enable Revlon, Inc. to
satisfy the remaining $9.7 of debt reduction as part of the ﬁnal stage of the Company’s debt reduction plan.
Therefore, Revlon, Inc. now intends to conduct an equity offering of approximately $110 by the end of
March 2006 and to use such proceeds to reduce Products Corporation’s debt. Consistent with agreements
between MacAndrews & Forbes and Revlon, Inc. entered into contemporaneously with the agreements
relating to the Revlon Exchange Transactions, MacAndrews & Forbes agreed to back-stop the $110
equity offering. (See ‘‘Recent Developments’’).

Products Corporation’s EBITDA (as deﬁned in the 2001 Credit Agreement) for the four consecutive
ﬁscal quarters ended December 31, 2003 was less than the minimum of $230 required under the 2001
Credit Agreement for that period and Products Corporation’s leverage ratio was 1.66:1.00, which was in
excess of the maximum ratio of 1.10:1.00 permitted under the 2001 Credit Agreement for that period.
Accordingly, Products Corporation sought and on January 28, 2004 secured an amendment to the 2001
Credit Agreement (the ‘‘January 2004 Bank Amendment’’) that included waivers of compliance with

these covenants for the four quarters ended December 31, 2003 and, in light of the Company’s expectation
that its plan would affect Products Corporation’s ability to comply with these covenants under the 2001
Credit Agreement during 2004, an amendment to eliminate the EBITDA and leverage ratio covenants of
the 2001 Credit Agreement for the ﬁrst three quarters of 2004 and a waiver of compliance with such
covenants for the four quarters ending December 31, 2004 expiring on January 31, 2005. In July 2004, the
2001 Credit Agreement was repaid and reﬁnanced with the 2004 Credit Agreement.

In December 2003, Revlon, Inc. announced that its Board of Directors approved two loans from
MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, one to provide up to $100 (the ‘‘2004 MacAndrews & Forbes Loan’’),
if needed, to enable the Company to continue to implement and reﬁne its plan, and the other to provide
an additional $25 (the ‘‘$25 million MacAndrews & Forbes Loan’’) to be used for general corporate
purposes. The 2004 MacAndrews & Forbes Loan and $25 million MacAndrews & Forbes Loan were
consolidated into one term loan agreement (referred to herein as the ‘‘2004 MacAndrews & Forbes $125
million term loan’’).

The 2004 MacAndrews & Forbes $125 million term loan, as discussed in Note 9 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements, was consolidated with the MacAndrews & Forbes $65 million line of credit into the
2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit in July 2004, with availability of $152. (See Note
9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

2003 Financing Transactions

In February 2003, the Company entered into an investment agreement with MacAndrews & Forbes
Inc. (the ‘‘2003 Investment Agreement’’) pursuant to which the Company undertook and, on June 20,
2003, completed, a $50 equity rights offering (the ‘‘2003 Rights Offering’’), pursuant to which Revlon, Inc.
issued an additional 17,605,650 shares of its Class A Common Stock, including 3,015,303 shares subscribed
for by the public and 14,590,347 shares issued to MacAndrews & Forbes Inc. in a private placement
(representing the number of shares of Revlon, Inc.’s Class A Common Stock that MacAndrews & Forbes
Inc. would otherwise have been entitled to purchase pursuant to its basic subscription privilege, which was
approximately 83% of the shares of Revlon, Inc.’s Class A Common Stock offered in the 2003 Rights
Offering).

In addition, in connection with the 2003 Investment Agreement, MacAndrews & Forbes Inc. also
made available a $100 term loan to Products Corporation (the ‘‘MacAndrews & Forbes $100 million term
loan’’). The MacAndrews & Forbes $100 million term loan was exchanged for equity in connection with
the Revlon Exchange Transactions. (See Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

Additionally, MacAndrews & Forbes Inc. also provided Products Corporation with an additional $40
line of credit during 2003, which amount was originally to increase to $65 on January 1, 2004 (the
‘‘MacAndrews & Forbes $65 million line of credit’’) (the MacAndrews & Forbes $100 million term loan
and the MacAndrews & Forbes $65 million line of credit, each as amended, are referred to as the ‘‘2003
MacAndrews & Forbes Loans’’) and which was originally to be available to Products Corporation through
December 31, 2004 (which, as discussed in Note 9, was consolidated with the 2004 MacAndrews & Forbes
$125 million term loan into the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit in July 2004).

Sources and Uses

The Company’s principal sources of funds are expected to be operating revenues, cash on hand, funds
available for borrowing under the 2004 Credit Agreement, the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes
Line of Credit and other permitted lines of credit. (See Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).
The 2004 Credit Agreement, the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit, Products
Corporation’s 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2008 (the ‘‘85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes’’),
Products Corporation’s 81⁄8% Senior Notes due 2006 (the ‘‘81⁄8% Senior Notes’’) and Products Corpora-
tion’s 9% Senior Notes due 2006 (the ‘‘9% Senior Notes’’) contain certain provisions that by their terms
limit Products Corporation’s and its subsidiaries’ ability to, among other things, incur additional debt. See
‘‘Part I, Item 1—Recent Developments.’’

The Company’s principal uses of funds are expected to be the payment of operating expenses,
including expenses in connection with the continued implementation of, and reﬁnement to, the

Company’s plan, purchases of permanent wall displays, capital expenditure requirements, payments in
connection with the Company’s restructuring programs referred to herein, debt service payments and
costs and regularly scheduled pension contributions. Cash contributions to the Company’s pension and
post-retirement beneﬁt plans were approximately $34 in 2004 and the Company expects them to be
approximately $24 in 2005.

The Company has undertaken a number of programs to efﬁciently manage its cash and working
capital
including, among other things, programs to carefully manage inventory levels, centralized
purchasing to secure discounts and efﬁciencies in procurement, and providing additional discounts to U.S.
customers for more timely payment of receivables and careful management of accounts payable.

The Company previously estimated that charges related to the implementation of the stabilization
and growth phase of its plan would not exceed $160. The Company recorded charges of approximately
$104 in 2002, approximately $31 in 2003 and nil in 2004 related to the implementation of the stabilization
and growth phase of its plan. Cash payments related to the foregoing charges were approximately $80 and
$20 during 2003 and 2004, respectively.

The Company developed a new design for its wall displays (which the Company is continuing to
reﬁne as part of the implementation of its plan) and began installing them at certain customers’ retail
stores during 2002. While most of the new wall displays were installed during 2002 and 2003, the Company
continued to install the remainder of the wall displays during 2004. The Company is also reconﬁguring
existing wall displays at its retail customers. Accordingly, the Company accelerated the amortization of its
old wall displays. The Company estimates that purchases of wall displays for 2005 will be approximately
$50 to $60. The Company estimates that capital expenditures for 2005 will be approximately $20 to $30.

The Company expects that operating revenues, cash on hand and funds available for borrowing
under the 2004 Credit Agreement, the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit and
other permitted lines of credit will be sufﬁcient to enable the Company to cover its operating expenses for
2005, including cash requirements in connection with the Company’s operations, the continued imple-
mentation of, and reﬁnement to, the Company’s plan, cash requirements in connection with the
Company’s restructuring programs referred to above, the Company’s debt service requirements and
regularly scheduled pension contributions. (See Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).
However, there can be no assurance that such funds will be sufﬁcient to meet the Company’s cash
requirements on a consolidated basis. If the Company’s anticipated level of revenue growth is not
achieved because, for example, of decreased consumer spending in response to weak economic conditions
or weakness in the mass market cosmetics category, adverse changes in currency, increased competition
from the Company’s competitors, changes in consumer purchasing habits, including with respect to
shopping channels, or the Company’s advertising and marketing plans are not as successful as anticipated,
or if the Company’s expenses associated with the continued implementation of, and reﬁnement to, the
Company’s plan exceed the anticipated level of expenses, the Company’s current sources of funds may be
insufﬁcient to meet the Company’s cash requirements.

The U.S. mass-market color cosmetics category during 2004 and 2003 was softer than the Company
expected, declining by 2.5% in 2004 and 1.9% in 2003. Despite this softness in the U.S. mass-market color
cosmetics category, based upon the Company’s belief that its continued implementation of its plan is
proving effective, the Company intends to continue to support its plan. Additionally, in the event of a
decrease in demand for Products Corporation’s products, reduced sales, lack of increases in demand and
sales, changes in consumer purchasing habits, including with respect to shopping channels, and/or
increased returns or expenses associated with the continued implementation of, and reﬁnement to, the
Company’s plan exceed the Company’s expectations, any such development, if signiﬁcant, could reduce
Products Corporation’s revenues and could adversely affect Products Corporation’s ability to comply with
certain ﬁnancial covenants under the 2004 Credit Agreement and in such event the Company could be
required to take measures, including reducing discretionary spending.

or revising restructuring programs, restructuring indebtedness, selling assets or operations, seeking
additional capital contributions or loans from MacAndrews & Forbes, the Company’s other afﬁliates or
third parties, selling additional equity or debt securities of Revlon, Inc. (or debt securities of Products
Corporation) or reducing other discretionary spending. There can be no assurance that the Company
would be able to take any of the actions referred to above because of a variety of commercial or market
factors or constraints in the Company’s debt instruments, including, for example, market conditions being
unfavorable for an equity or debt offering, additional capital contributions or loans not being available
from afﬁliates or third parties, or that the transactions may not be permitted under the terms of the
Company’s various debt instruments then in effect, because of restrictions on the incurrence of debt,
incurrence of liens, asset dispositions and related party transactions. In addition, such actions, if ever
taken, may not enable the Company to satisfy its cash requirements or comply with its debt covenants if
the actions do not generate a sufﬁcient amount of additional capital.

The Company may have debt maturing in 2005 if and to the extent Products Corporation draws
under the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit. As noted in ‘‘Recent Develop-
ments’’, on March 8, 2005, Products Corporation announced its intention to complete, in the ﬁrst quarter
of 2005, a reﬁnancing of its 81⁄8% Senior Notes and 9% Senior Notes due 2006, which currently have
outstanding an aggregate principal amount of $116.2 and $75.5, respectively. The Company intends to
likewise reﬁnance Products Corporation’s 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes, with an aggregate principal
amount outstanding of $327.0, prior to their maturity in 2008. Under the 2004 Credit Agreement, Products
Corporation must reﬁnance the 81⁄8% Senior Notes by October 31, 2005, the 9% Senior Notes by July 31,
2006 and the 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes by October 30, 2007 (such that in the case of the 85⁄8%
Senior Subordinated Notes not more than $25.0 aggregate principal amount remains outstanding). In
addition, it would be an event of default under the 2004 Credit Agreement if Revlon, Inc. failed to
undertake a $110.0 equity offering and transfer the net proceeds of such offering to Products Corporation
to reduce Products Corporation’s outstanding indebtedness by March 31, 2006. As of March 1, 2005,
Products Corporation had drawn $800.0 under the Term Loan Facility of the 2004 Credit Agreement and
had availability of $143.1 under the Multi-Currency Facility and $152 under the 2004 Consolidated
MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit. (See Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

Revlon, Inc., as a holding company, will be dependent on the earnings and cash ﬂow of, and dividends
and distributions from, Products Corporation to pay its expenses and to pay any cash dividend or
distribution on Revlon, Inc.’s Class A Common Stock that may be authorized by the Board of Directors
of Revlon, Inc. The terms of the 2004 Credit Agreement, the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes
Line of Credit, the 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes, the 81⁄8% Senior Notes and the 9% Senior Notes
generally restrict Products Corporation from paying dividends or making distributions, except that
Products Corporation is permitted to pay dividends and make distributions to Revlon, Inc. to enable
Revlon, Inc., among other things, to pay expenses incidental to being a public holding company, including,
among other things, professional fees such as legal and accounting fees, regulatory fees such as
Commission ﬁling fees and other miscellaneous expenses related to being a public holding company and,
subject to certain limitations, to pay dividends or make distributions in certain circumstances to ﬁnance
the purchase by Revlon, Inc. of its Class A Common Stock in connection with the delivery of such Class
A Common Stock to grantees under the Amended and Restated Revlon, Inc. Stock Plan (the ‘‘Stock
Plan’’).

Products Corporation and certain of its subsidiaries, and MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings entered into
a tax sharing agreement (as subsequently amended and restated, the ‘‘MacAndrews & Forbes Tax Sharing
Agreement’’), pursuant to which MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings agreed to indemnify Revlon, Inc. and
Products Corporation against federal, state or local income tax liabilities of the MacAndrews & Forbes
Group (other than in respect of Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation) for taxable periods beginning on
or after January 1, 1992 during which Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation or a subsidiary of Products
Corporation was a member of such group. Pursuant to the MacAndrews & Forbes Tax Sharing
Agreement, for all such taxable periods, Products Corporation was required to pay to Revlon, Inc., which
in turn was required to pay to Revlon Holdings, amounts equal to the taxes that Products Corporation
would otherwise have had to pay if it were to ﬁle separate federal, state or local income tax returns
(including any amounts determined to be due as a result of a redetermination arising from an audit or
otherwise of the consolidated or combined tax liability relating to any such period which was attributable
to Products Corporation), except that Products Corporation was not entitled to carry back any losses to
taxable periods ending prior to January 1, 1992. No payments were required by Products Corporation or
Revlon, Inc. if and to the extent Products Corporation was prohibited under the terms of its 2004 Credit
Agreement from making tax sharing payments to Revlon, Inc. The 2004 Credit Agreement prohibits
Products Corporation from making such tax sharing payments under the MacAndrews & Forbes Tax
Sharing Agreement other than in respect of state and local income taxes. The MacAndrews & Forbes Tax
Sharing Agreement was amended, effective as of January 1, 2001, to eliminate a contingent payment to
Revlon, Inc. under certain circumstances in return for a $10 million note with interest at 12% and interest
and principal payable by MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings on December 31, 2005. As a result of tax net
operating losses and prohibitions under the 2004 Credit Agreement, there were no federal tax payments
or payments in lieu of taxes pursuant to the MacAndrews & Forbes Tax Sharing Agreement in respect of
2004.

Following the closing of the Revlon Exchange Transactions, Revlon, Inc. became the parent of a new
consolidated group for federal income tax purposes and Products Corporation’s federal taxable income
and loss will be included in such group’s consolidated tax returns. Accordingly, Revlon, Inc. and Products
Corporation entered into a new tax sharing agreement (the ‘‘Revlon Tax Sharing Agreement’’) pursuant
to which Products Corporation will be required to pay to Revlon, Inc. amounts equal to the taxes that
Products Corporation would otherwise have had to pay if Products Corporation were to ﬁle separate
federal, state or local income tax returns, limited to the amount, and payable only at such times, as
Revlon, Inc. will be required to make payments to the applicable taxing authorities. The 2004 Credit
Agreement does not prohibit payments from Products Corporation to Revlon, Inc. to the extent required
under the Revlon Tax Sharing Agreement. As a result of tax net operating losses, we expect that there
will be no federal tax payments or payments in lieu of taxes by Products Corporation to Revlon, Inc.
pursuant to the Revlon Tax Sharing Agreement in respect of 2004.

As a result of dealing with suppliers and vendors in a number of foreign countries, Products
Corporation enters into foreign currency forward exchange contracts and option contracts from time to
time to hedge certain cash ﬂows denominated in foreign currencies. There were foreign currency forward
exchange contracts with a notional amount of $31.5 outstanding at December 31, 2004. The fair value of
foreign currency forward exchange contracts outstanding at December 31, 2004 was $(2.3).

Disclosures about Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

The following table aggregates all contractual commitments and commercial obligations that affect

the Company’s ﬁnancial condition and liquidity position as of December 31, 2004:

Contractual Obligations

Total

Less than 1 year

1-3 years

4-5 years

After 5 years

Payments Due by Period
(dollars in millions)

Long-term Debt,

Including Current
Portion . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Interest on Long-term

$1,318.7

$ 10.5

$534.2

$774.0

Debt (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . .

461.6

108.4

257.2

96.0

Capital Lease

Obligations . . . . . . . . . . .

Operating Leases . . . . . . . .

Purchase Obligations (b) . .

5.9

145.5

30.1

Other Long-term
Obligations (c)

. . . . . . .

58.0

Total Contractual Cash

1.6

15.5

30.1

49.8

4.3

47.0

8.2

28.6

$54.4

Obligations . . . . . . . . . . .

$2,019.8

$215.9

$850.9

$898.6

$54.4

(a) Consists of interest on the 81⁄8% Senior Notes, 9% Senior Notes, 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes and the $800 Term Loan
Facility under the 2004 Credit Agreement through the respective maturity dates based upon assumptions regarding the amount
of debt outstanding under the 2004 Credit Agreement and assumed interest rates.

(b) Consists of purchase commitments for ﬁnished goods, raw materials, components and services pursuant to enforceable and
legally binding obligations which include all signiﬁcant terms, including ﬁxed or minimum quantities to be purchased; ﬁxed,
minimum or variable price provisions; and the approximate timing of the transaction.

(c) Consists primarily of obligations related to advertising, insurance, employment contracts and other personnel service contracts.
Such amounts exclude severance and other contractual commitments related to restructuring, which are discussed under
‘‘Restructuring Costs’’.

Off-Balance Sheet Transactions

The Company does not maintain any off-balance sheet transactions, arrangements, obligations or
other relationships with unconsolidated entities or others that are reasonably likely to have a material
current or future effect on the Company’s ﬁnancial condition, changes in ﬁnancial condition, revenues or
expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), ‘‘Share-Based Payment,’’ an
amendment to FASB Statements Nos. 123 and 95 (‘‘SFAS No. 123(R)’’), which replaces SFAS No. 123,
and supercedes APB Opinion No. 25, ‘‘Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.’’ SFAS No. 123(R)
requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock option, to be
recognized in the ﬁnancial statements based on their fair values beginning with the ﬁrst interim or annual
period after June 15, 2005, with early adoption encouraged. The pro forma disclosures previously
permitted under SFAS No. 123 no longer will be an alternative to ﬁnancial statement recognition. The
Company is required to adopt SFAS No. 123(R) in the third quarter of ﬁscal 2005, beginning July 1, 2005.
Under SFAS No. 123(R), the Company must determine the appropriate fair value model to be used for
valuing share-based payments, the amortization method for compensation cost and the transition method
to be used at the date of adoption. The transition methods are either a prospective method or a retroactive

method. Under the retroactive method, prior periods may be restated either as of the beginning of the
year of adoption or for all periods presented. The prospective method requires that compensation
expense be recorded for all unvested stock options and restricted stock at the beginning of the ﬁrst quarter
of adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), while the retroactive method would record compensation expense for
all unvested stock options and restricted stock beginning with the ﬁrst period restated. The Company is
evaluating the requirements of SFAS No. 123(R) and expects that the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) will
have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations and earnings per share. The
Company is currently evaluating the impact of SFAS 123(R) and has not yet determined the method of
adoption or the effect of adopting SFAS 123 (R), and it has not determined whether its adoption will
result in amounts in future period that are similar to the Company’s current pro forma disclosures under
SFAS No. 123.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, ‘‘Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets - An
Amendment of APB Opinion No. 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions’’ (‘‘SFAS No. 153’’).
SFAS No. 153 eliminates the exception from fair value measurement for nonmonetary exchanges of
similar productive assets in paragraph 21(b) of APB Opinion No. 29, ‘‘Accounting for Nonmonetary
Transactions,’’ and replaces it with an exception for exchanges that do not have commercial substance.
SFAS No. 153 speciﬁes that a nonmonetary exchange has commercial substance if the future cash ﬂows
of the entity are expected to change signiﬁcantly as a result of the exchange. SFAS No. 153 is effective for
the ﬁscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005 and is required to be adopted by the Company beginning
on January 1, 2006. The provisions of this statement will be applied prospectively. The Company is
currently evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 153 and does not expect that its adoption of SFAS No. 153
will have a material impact on its consolidated results of operations and ﬁnancial condition.

In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, ‘‘Inventory Costs - An Amendment of ARB No.
43, Chapter 4’’ (‘‘SFAS No. 151’’). SFAS No. 151 amends the guidance in ARB No. 43, Chapter 4,
‘‘Inventory Pricing,’’ to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight,
handling costs, and wasted material (spoilage). Among other provisions, the new rule requires that items
such as idle facility expense, excessive spoilage, double freight, and handling cost be recognized as
current-period charges regardless of whether they meet the criterion of ‘‘so abnormal’’ as stated in ARB
No. 43. Additionally, SFAS No. 151 requires that the allocation of ﬁxed production overheads to the costs
of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. SFAS No. 151 is effective for
ﬁscal years beginning after June 15, 2005 and is required to be adopted by the Company beginning on
January 1, 2006. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 151 but does not expect
that its adoption will have a material impact on its consolidated results of operations and ﬁnancial
condition.

In May 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 106-2 (‘‘FSP 106-2’’), ‘‘Accounting and
Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization
Act of 2003’’ which provides guidance on the accounting for the effects of the Medicare Act. FSP No.
106-2, which requires measurement of the Accumulated Postretirement Beneﬁt Obligation (‘‘APBO’’)
and net periodic postretirement beneﬁt cost to reﬂect the effects of the Medicare Act, supercedes FSP
106-1. FSP 106-2 is effective for interim or annual periods beginning after June 15, 2004. Adoption of FSP
106-2 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations and ﬁnancial
condition.

Inﬂation

In general, the Company’s costs are affected by inﬂation and the effects of inﬂation may be
experienced by the Company in future periods. Management believes, however, that such effects have not
been material to the Company during the past three years in the United States and in foreign
non-hyperinﬂationary countries. The Company operates in certain countries around the world, such as
Argentina, Brazil, Venezuela and Mexico that have in the past experienced hyperinﬂation. In hyperin-
ﬂationary foreign countries, the Company attempts to mitigate the effects of inﬂation by increasing prices
in line with inﬂation, where possible, and efﬁciently managing its working capital levels.

Subsequent Events

See ‘‘Part I, Item 1—Recent Developments.’’

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Interest Rate Sensitivity

The Company has exposure to changing interest rates, primarily in the U.S. under the Term Loan
Facility and Multi-Currency Facility of the 2004 Credit Agreement. The Company’s policy is to manage
interest rate risk through the use of a combination of ﬁxed and ﬂoating rate debt. The Company from time
to time makes use of derivative ﬁnancial instruments to adjust its ﬁxed and ﬂoating rate ratio. There were
no such derivative ﬁnancial instruments outstanding at December 31, 2004. The table below provides
information about the Company’s indebtedness that is sensitive to changes in interest rates. The table
presents cash ﬂows with respect to principal on indebtedness and related weighted average interest rates
by expected maturity dates. Weighted average variable rates are based on implied forward rates in the
yield curve at December 31, 2004. The information is presented in U.S. dollar equivalents, which is the
Company’s reporting currency.

Exchange Rate Sensitivity

The Company manufactures and sells its products in a number of countries throughout the world and,
as a result, is exposed to movements in foreign currency exchange rates. In addition, a portion of the
Company’s borrowings are denominated in foreign currencies, which are also subject to market risk
associated with exchange rate movement. The Company from time to time hedges major foreign currency
cash exposures generally through foreign exchange forward and option contracts. The contracts are
entered into with major ﬁnancial institutions to minimize counterparty risk. These contracts generally
have a duration of less than twelve months and are primarily against the U.S. dollar. In addition, the
Company enters into foreign currency swaps to hedge intercompany ﬁnancing transactions. The Company
does not hold or issue ﬁnancial instruments for trading purposes.

The following table presents the information required by Item 7A of Form 10-K as of December 31,

2004:

Expected maturity date for the year ended December 31,

2008

2009
(dollars in millions)

Thereafter

2005

2006

2007

Debt
Short-term variable rate

(various currencies) . . . . . .
Average interest rate (a) .

$36.6

4.3%

Long-term ﬁxed rate —

third party ($US) . . . . . . . .
Average interest rate. . . . .

8.5
8.1%

$183.2

$327.0

8.5%

8.6%

Fair Value
Dec. 31,
2004

Total

36.6

518.7

480.4

Long-term variable rate —

third party ($US) . . . . . . . .
Average interest rate (a) .

8.0
2.0
10.2% 10.2% 10.2% 10.2% 10.2%

$ 8.0

8.0

$766.0

10.2%

800.0

Total debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$47.1

$191.2

$335.0

$ 8.0

$766.0

$1,355.3

$1,317.0

Forward Contracts
Sell Hong Kong Dollars/Buy USD.
Buy Euros/Sell USD . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sell British Pounds/Buy USD . . . . .
Sell Australian Dollars/Buy USD . .
Sell Canadian Dollars/Buy USD. . .
Sell South African Rand/Buy

Average
Contractual
Rate
$/FC

0.1286
1.1939
1.8288
0.7265
0.7488

USD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

0.1516

Buy Australian Dollars/Sell New

Zealand Dollars . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Buy British Pounds/Sell Euros . . . .

Total forward contracts. . . . . . . . . . .

1.1222
0.6802

Original
US Dollar
Notional
Amount

Contract
Value
Dec. 31,
2004

Fair Value
Dec. 31,
2004

$ 0.3
1.0
6.3
11.0
3.9

7.0

0.9
1.1

$ 0.3
1.1
6.1
10.3
3.5

5.9

0.9
1.1

$ —
0.1
(0.2)
(0.7)
(0.4)

(1.1)

—
—

$31.5

$29.2

$(2.3)

(a) Weighted average variable rates are based upon implied forward rates from the yield curves at December 31, 2004.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Reference is made to the Index on page F-1 of the Consolidated Financial Statements of the

Company and the Notes thereto contained herein.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

Not applicable.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Company maintains disclosure controls and proce-
dures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s reports
under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
speciﬁed in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to
management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Ofﬁcer and Chief Financial Ofﬁcer, as appropri-
ate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. The Company’s management, with the

participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Ofﬁcer and Chief Financial Ofﬁcer, has evaluated the
effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the ﬁscal year covered
by this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A. As described below under Management’s Annual Report on
Internal Control over Financial Reporting, the Company has identiﬁed a material weakness in the
Company’s internal control over ﬁnancial reporting (as deﬁned in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f)). As a result of this material weakness, the Company’s Chief Executive Ofﬁcer and Chief
Financial Ofﬁcer have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form
10-K/A, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective.

In light of this material weakness, in preparing its ﬁnancial statements as of and for the ﬁscal year
ended December 31, 2004, the Company performed additional analyses and other post-closing procedures
pertaining to sales return estimates in an effort to ensure the Company’s consolidated ﬁnancial statements
included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K (and in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A) for the ﬁscal
year ended December 31, 2004 have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles. KPMG LLP’s report, dated March 9, 2005, expressed an unqualiﬁed opinion on our
consolidated ﬁnancial statements. Additionally, during the ﬁrst quarter of 2005, we implemented
additional controls and procedures, as discussed below in paragraph (d) of this Item 9A, that we believe
will remediate this weakness.

(b) Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. The Company’s
management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over ﬁnancial
reporting. The Company’s internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of ﬁnancial reporting and the preparation and fair presentation of published
ﬁnancial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those
policies and procedures that:

• pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reﬂect the

transactions and dispositions of its assets;

• provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation
of ﬁnancial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that its
receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of its
management and directors; and

• provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisi-
tion, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on its ﬁnancial
statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over ﬁnancial reporting may not prevent or detect
misstatements. Management’s projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over
ﬁnancial reporting as to future periods are subject to the risks that controls may become inadequate
because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate.

A material weakness is a signiﬁcant deﬁciency, or combination of signiﬁcant deﬁciencies, that results
in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim ﬁnancial
statements will not be prevented or detected. A signiﬁcant deﬁciency is a control deﬁciency, or
combination of control deﬁciencies, that adversely affects the Company’s ability to initiate, authorize,
record, process, or report external ﬁnancial information reliably in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles such that there is more than a remote likelihood that a misstatement of the
Company’s annual or interim ﬁnancial statements that is more than inconsequential will not be prevented
or detected.

The Company’s management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over
ﬁnancial reporting as of December 31, 2004 and in making this assessment used the criteria set forth by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control-Integrated
Framework in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). This assessment identiﬁed a deﬁciency in the Company’s policies and procedures related
to the periodic review and validation of the data input and outputs used in the Company’s estimates of

the reserves for sales returns in the U.S. As a result of this deﬁciency, an error in accounting for the
reserve for sales returns in the U.S. as of December 31, 2004 occurred and was not detected by the
Company. In this speciﬁc instance, performance of the Company’s review procedures did not identify the
omission of inventory located at certain stores acquired by a customer in 2004. This deﬁciency constituted
a material weakness in the Company’s internal control over ﬁnancial reporting as of December 31, 2004.

Revlon, Inc.’s management determined that, because of the material weakness described above, as of

December 31, 2004, the Company’s internal control over ﬁnancial reporting was not effective.

KPMG LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting ﬁrm that audited the
Company’s ﬁnancial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended
December 31, 2004, has issued an audit report on management’s assessment of the Company’s internal
control over ﬁnancial reporting. This report appears on page F-3.

(c) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There have not been any changes in
the Company’s internal control over ﬁnancial reporting during the ﬁscal quarter ended December 31, 2004
that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control
over ﬁnancial reporting. As described above in paragraph (b) of Item 9A under Management’s Annual
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, the Company identiﬁed a material weakness in the
Company’s internal control over ﬁnancial reporting and, as described below in paragraph (d) of this Item
9A, the Company made changes to its internal control over ﬁnancial reporting during the ﬁrst quarter of
2005 that are intended to remediate such weakness.

(d) Remediation of the Material Weakness in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. As
described above, management’s assessment of its internal control over ﬁnancial reporting identiﬁed a
material weakness in the Company’s internal control over ﬁnancial reporting related to the Company’s
review and validation of the data input and outputs used in the estimates of reserves for sales returns in
the U.S. Speciﬁcally, in 2004, an error of approximately $1.2 million in the estimate of the sales return
calculation for one of the Company’s large U.S. customers was not detected. The customer in question
acquired a signiﬁcant number of stores in 2004 and inventory of certain of those newly-acquired store
locations was not included in the data made available to the Company for estimating the reserves for sales
returns. As a result, during its 2004 year end closing, the Company understated its estimates of the sales
returns related to these newly-acquired stores by approximately $1.2 million. Our aggregate sales returns
reserve in the U.S. for the full ﬁscal year ended December 31, 2004 was approximately $83 million.
Although this control deﬁciency resulted in the error identiﬁed above, it did not result in a material
misstatement of our consolidated ﬁnancial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2004 or
for the interim periods within that year.

To remediate this material weakness, in the ﬁrst quarter of 2005, management implemented a
remediation program, including the establishment of additional controls, to strengthen its internal control
process with respect to the sales return calculation. This program and controls currently include, among
other things, the adoption of policies pursuant to which the following procedures will be performed:

In order to facilitate the estimate of sales returns in the future, following a merger, acquisition or
consolidation transaction involving signiﬁcant customers, the Company’s sales force will provide
inventory and point of sale information for each of the customers involved in the transaction to
provide a base line to estimate sales returns. The Company will then prepare a reconciliation
between the base line information and the sales return estimation for the combined customers
after giving effect to the transaction.

2. The Company will analyze separately inventory and/or point of sale information that are
maintained on different systems of signiﬁcant customers involved in a merger, acquisition or
consolidation transaction and will separately estimate returns for each of those customers.

3. The Company will enhance documentation and formal validation of key data and assumptions

used to calculate the sales returns.

4. The Company will formalize the analytical validation by accounting personnel of the sales return
calculation for signiﬁcant customers. This analysis will be reviewed and approved by both senior
ﬁnance and sales department executives.

Management believes that these actions and controls will strengthen our disclosure controls and
procedures, as well as our internal control over ﬁnancial reporting, and will remediate the material
weakness that the Company identiﬁed in its internal control over ﬁnancial reporting as of December 31,
2004. We have discussed this material weakness and our remediation program with our Audit Committee.

Item 9B. Other Information

At a meeting on March 7, 2005, the Compensation and Stock Plan Committee of the Board of
Directors of Revlon, Inc. determined the extent to which objective, performance-based criteria
established in early 2004 by the Compensation and Stock Plan Committee in respect of 2004 had been
satisﬁed, and approved partial cash bonus payouts under the Company’s Executive Bonus Plan in place
during 2004 based on the ﬁnal results for 2004. Information regarding cash bonus payments for 2004 to
Named Executive Ofﬁcers (as deﬁned below) of the Company is set forth in The Summary Compensation
Table in Part III, Item 11. (Executive Compensation) of this Form 10-K.

On March 7, 2005, the Company entered into a Second Amendment (the ‘‘Second Amendment’’) to
the 2004 Investment Agreement with MacAndrews & Forbes pursuant to which the parties accelerated
from March 31, 2006 to October 31, 2005 MacAndrews & Forbes’ obligation under the 2004 Investment
Agreement to back-stop a $109.7 equity offering to be conducted by Revlon, Inc. if Products Corporation
has not as of October 31, 2005 reﬁnanced the 81⁄8% Senior Notes and Revlon, Inc. conducts an equity
offering to effect such reﬁnancing. For a description of the material terms of the 2004 Investment
Agreement and the Second Amendment, see ‘‘Part I, Item 1—Recent Developments’’ and ‘‘Part III,
Item 13 — Certain Relationships and Related Transactions — Debt Reduction Transactions and Related
Agreements — Certain Agreements Relating to the Debt Reduction Transactions — 2004 Investment
Agreement.’’ A copy of the Second Amendment is attached to this Form 10-K as Exhibit 10.31 and the
terms of the Second Amendment are incorporated herein by reference.

Forward Looking Statements

This Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, as well as other public
documents and statements of the Company, contain forward-looking statements that involve risks and
uncertainties, which are based on estimates, objectives, visions, projections, forecasts, plans, strategies,
beliefs, intent, opportunities, drivers, destinations and expectations of the Company’s management. The
Company’s actual results may differ materially from those discussed in such forward-looking statements.
Such statements include, without limitation, the Company’s expectations and estimates (whether
qualitative or quantitative) as to:

(i)

(ii)

(iii)

the Company’s future ﬁnancial performance, including the Company’s belief that its plan
is proving effective and that it has strengthened its organizational capability (and its
expectation to continue to do so in 2005) and that it has strengthened its relationships with
its key retailers in the U.S.;

the effect on sales of political and/or economic conditions, political uncertainties, military
actions, terrorist activities, adverse currency ﬂuctuations, competitive activities, weak
economic conditions, category weakness and changes in consumer purchasing habits,
including with respect to shopping channels;

the charges and the cash costs resulting from implementing and reﬁning the Company’s
plan and the timing of such costs, including the Company’s belief that the continued
implementation and reﬁnement to its plan could include taking advantage of opportunities
to reposition, repackage and/or reformulate one or more of its brands or product lines
and/or launching new brands or product lines and/or further reﬁning its approach to retail
merchandising, any of which, whose intended purpose would be to create value through
proﬁtable growth, could result in the Company making investments and/or recognizing
charges related to executing against opportunities and the Company’s expectation that it
will complete its advertising review in the ﬁrst quarter of 2005;

(iv)

(v)

(vi)

(vii)

the Company’s plans regarding the continued growth momentum and accelerated growth
phase of its plan, including the Company’s plans to capitalize on the actions taken during
the stabilization and growth phase of its plan, with the objective of increasing revenues and
achieving proﬁtability over the long term, by reﬁning and adding to its plan, such as
developing and implementing the Company’s productivity initiatives, and the Company’s
expectation that such actions would help it achieve the objective of balancing top-line
growth with improved operating margins;

the Company’s plans to further improve its new product development and introduction
process;

the Company’s plans to continue to increase the effectiveness and reduce the cost of its
display walls;

the Company’s plans to drive efﬁciencies across its overall supply chain, including reducing
manufactory costs by streamlining components and sourcing strategically and rationalizing
its supply chain in Europe, the Company’s plan to transition its European manufacturing
from COSi primarily to the Company’s Oxford, North Carolina facility and to secure
warehousing and distribution services from third parties in the U.K, and its expectation
that such transition will not result in any disruption to its supply chain;

(viii)

the Company’s plans to optimize the effectiveness of its marketing, including advertising
and media, and promotions;

(ix)

(x)

(xi)

(xii)

(xiii)

the Company’s plans to strengthen its balance sheet and capital structure, including its
plans to reﬁnance Products Corporation’s 81⁄8% Senior Notes and 9% Senior Notes in the
ﬁrst quarter of 2005 and Products Corporation’s 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes by
October 30, 2007 prior to their maturity, and Revlon, Inc.’s plans, if Products Corporation
does not reﬁnance the 81⁄8% Senior Notes in the ﬁrst quarter of 2005, to reﬁnance such
notes with the proceeds of a debt or equity offering to be conducted by Revlon, Inc., by
October 31, 2005 and, absent any such equity offering Revlon, Inc.’s plans to conduct
further rights and equity offerings in the amount of approximately $110 by the end of
March 2006, the net proceeds of which would be transferred to Products Corporation to
reduce its debt;

restructuring activities, restructuring costs, the timing of restructuring payments and
annual savings and other beneﬁts from such activities;

operating revenues, cash on hand and availability of borrowings under Products Corpo-
ration’s 2004 Credit Agreement, the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of
Credit and other permitted lines of credit being sufﬁcient to satisfy the Company’s
operating expenses in 2005, including cash requirements referred to in item (xiii) below;

the availability of funds from Products Corporation’s 2004 Credit Agreement, the 2004
Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit and other permitted lines of credit,
restructuring indebtedness, selling assets or operations, capital contributions and/or loans
from MacAndrews & Forbes, the Company’s other afﬁliates and/or third parties and/or the
sale of additional equity or debt securities of Revlon, Inc. (or debt securities of Products
Corporation);

the Company’s uses of funds, including amounts required for the payment of operating
expenses, including expenses in connection with the continued implementation of, and
reﬁnement to, the Company’s plan, payments in connection with the Company’s purchases
of permanent wall displays, capital expenditures, restructuring programs, debt service
payments and regularly scheduled pension contributions, and its estimates of operating
expenses, working capital expenses, wall display costs, capital expenditures, cash contri-
butions to the Company’s pension plans and post-retirement beneﬁt plans, debt service
payments (including payments required under Products Corporation’s debt instruments)
and charges in connection with the Company’s growth plan;

(xiv) matters concerning the Company’s market-risk sensitive instruments;

(xv)

the effects of the Company’s adoption of certain accounting principles;

(xvi)

the Company’s estimates of the amount of U.S. federal net operating losses and the
alternative minimum tax losses available to the Company;

(xvii) the Company’s plan to efﬁciently manage its cash and working capital, including, among
other things, by carefully managing and reducing inventory levels, centralizing purchasing
to secure discounts and efﬁciencies in procurement, and providing additional discounts to
U.S. customers for more timely payment of receivables and carefully managing accounts
payable; and

(xviii) Revlon, Inc.’s belief that the remediation program that it has undertaken to date to
remediate the material weakness that it identiﬁed in its internal control over ﬁnancial
reporting will prove effective, including the Company’s belief that its remediation program
will strengthen its disclosure controls and procedures and internal control process with
respect to its sales return calculations.

Statements that are not historical facts, including statements about the Company’s beliefs and
expectations, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements can be identiﬁed by, among
other things, the use of forward-looking language, such as ‘‘believes,’’ ‘‘expects,’’ ‘‘estimates,’’ ‘‘projects,’’
‘‘forecast,’’ ‘‘may,’’ ‘‘will,’’ ‘‘should,’’ ‘‘seeks,’’ ‘‘plans,’’ ‘‘scheduled to,’’ ‘‘anticipates’’ or ‘‘intends’’ or the
negative of those terms, or other variations of those terms or comparable language, or by discussions of
strategy or intentions. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and except
for the Company’s ongoing obligations under the U.S. federal securities laws, the Company undertakes no
obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information,
future events or otherwise. Investors are advised, however, to consult any additional disclosures the
Company makes in its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q ﬁled in 2004 and Current Reports on Form 8-K
ﬁled with the Commission in 2004 and 2005 (which, among other places, can be found on the
Commission’s website at http://www.sec.gov, as well as on the Company’s website at www.revloninc.com).
The information available from time to time on such websites shall not be deemed incorporated by
reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K. A number of important factors could cause actual
results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement. In addition to factors
that may be described in the Company’s ﬁlings with the Commission, including this ﬁling, the following
factors, among others, could cause the Company’s actual results to differ materially from those expressed
in any forward-looking statements made by the Company:

(i)

(ii)

(iii)

unanticipated circumstances or results affecting the Company’s ﬁnancial performance,
including decreased consumer spending in response to weak economic conditions or
weakness in the category, changes in consumer preferences, such as reduced consumer
demand for the Company’s color cosmetics and other current products, changes in
consumer purchasing habits, including with respect to shopping channels, and actions by
technological break-
the Company’s competitors,
throughs, new products offerings, promotional spending and marketing and promotional
successes, including increases in market share;

including business combinations,

the effects of and changes in political and/or economic conditions, including inﬂation,
monetary conditions, military actions, terrorist activities, consumer purchasing habits,
including with respect to shopping channels, and in trade, monetary, ﬁscal and tax policies
in international markets;

unanticipated costs or difﬁculties or delays in completing projects associated with the
continued implementation of, and reﬁnement to, the Company’s plan or lower than
expected revenues or inability to achieve proﬁtability over the long term as a result of such
plan, including lower than expected sales, or higher than expected costs, arising from any
repositioning, repackaging and/or reformulating of one or more of the Company’s brands
or product lines and/or launching of new brands or product lines and/or further reﬁning its
approach to retail merchandising or difﬁculties or delays in completing its advertising
review during the ﬁrst quarter of 2005;

(iv)

difﬁculties, delays or unanticipated costs in implementing the Company’s plans regarding
the continued growth momentum and accelerated growth phase of its plan, including
difﬁculties, delays or unanticipated costs in taking actions to capitalize on the actions taken
during the stabilization and growth phase of its plan, which could affect the Company’s
ability to increase revenues and achieve proﬁtability over the long term, as well as
difﬁculties, delays or unanticipated costs related to the Company’s actions to reﬁne and
add to its plan, such as developing and implementing the Company’s productivity
initiatives, which could affect the Company’s ability to achieve its objective of balancing
top-line growth with improved operating margins;

(v)

difﬁculties, delays or unanticipated costs in connection with the Company’s plans to
further improve its new product development and introduction process, which could affect
the Company’s ability to effectively launch new products and/or reposition, repackage
and/or reformulate one or more of the Company’s brands or product lines and generate
revenues from such sources;

(vi)

difﬁculties, delays or unanticipated costs in implementing the Company’s plans to continue
to increase the effectiveness and reduce the cost of its display walls;

(vii) difﬁculties, delays or unanticipated costs in implementing the Company’s plans to drive
efﬁciencies across its overall supply chain,
including reducing manufactory costs by
streamlining components and sourcing strategically and rationalizing its supply chain in
Europe, including unexpected difﬁculties, delays, unanticipated costs or disruptions in
connection with its plans to transition European manufacturing from COSi primarily to
the Company’s Oxford, North Carolina facility and to secure warehousing and distribution
services from third parties in the U.K.;

(viii) difﬁculties, delays or unanticipated costs in implementing the Company’s plans to optimize
the effectiveness of its marketing, including advertising and media, and promotions;

(ix)

(x)

(xi)

difﬁculties, delays or unanticipated costs in, or the Company’s inability to consummate,
transactions to strengthen its balance sheet and capital structure, including difﬁculties,
delays or the inability of the Company to reﬁnance certain of Products Corporation’s debt,
including its plans to reﬁnance Products Corporation’s 81⁄8% Senior Notes and 9% Senior
Notes in the ﬁrst quarter of 2005 and Products Corporation’s 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated
Notes by October 30, 2007 prior to their maturity, and the Company’s plans, if Products
Corporation does not reﬁnance the 81⁄8% Senior Notes in the ﬁrst quarter of 2005, to
reﬁnance such notes with the proceeds of a debt or equity offering to be conducted by
Revlon, Inc. by October 31, 2005 and, absent any such equity offering, Revlon, Inc.’s plans
to conduct further rights and equity offerings to reduce Products Corporation’s debt in the
amount of approximately $110 by the end of March 2006, as well as the inability to issue
equity or debt securities, including Revlon, Inc. Class A Common Stock, for cash or in
exchange for Products Corporation’s indebtedness and difﬁculties, delays or the inability
of the Company to consummate the remaining Debt Reduction Transactions;

difﬁculties, delays or unanticipated costs or less than expected savings and other beneﬁts
resulting from the Company’s restructuring activities;

lower than expected operating revenues, the inability to secure capital contributions or
loans from MacAndrews & Forbes, the Company’s other afﬁliates and/or third parties;

(xii)

the unavailability of funds under Products Corporation’s 2004 Credit Agreement, the 2004
Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit or other permitted lines of credit;

(xiii) higher than expected operating expenses, sales returns, working capital expenses, wall
display costs, capital expenditures, restructuring costs, regularly scheduled cash pension
plan contributions, post-retirement beneﬁt plan contributions, growth plan charges or debt
service payments;

(xiv) interest rate or foreign exchange rate changes affecting the Company and its market

sensitive ﬁnancial instruments;

(xv) unanticipated effects of the Company’s adoption of certain new accounting standards;

(xvi) lower than expected U.S. federal net operating losses, CNOLs or alternative minimum tax

losses available to the Company;

(xvii) difﬁculties, delays or the inability of the Company to efﬁciently manage its cash and

working capital; and

(xviii) difﬁculties or delays that could affect the remediation program adopted by Revlon, Inc. to
remediate the material weakness that it identiﬁed in its internal control over ﬁnancial
reporting.

Factors other than those listed above could also cause the Company’s results to differ materially from
expected results. This discussion is provided as permitted by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
of 1995.

Part III INFORMATION

(Dollars in Part III are actual dollars, not millions)

Item 10. Directors and Executive Ofﬁcers of the Registrant

The following table sets forth certain information concerning the Directors and executive ofﬁcers of
the Company as of December 31, 2004. Each Director holds ofﬁce until his successor is duly elected and
qualiﬁed or until his resignation or removal, if earlier.

Name

Position

Ronald O. Perelman
Jack L. Stahl
Alan S. Bernikow
Paul J. Bohan
Donald G. Drapkin
Professor Meyer Feldberg
Howard Gittis
Edward J. Landau
Linda Gosden Robinson
Kenneth L. Wolfe

Chairman of the Board and Director
President, Chief Executive Ofﬁcer and Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director

The name, age (as of December 31, 2004), principal occupation for the last ﬁve years, selected
biographical information and period of service as a director of the Company of each of the Directors are
set forth below:

Mr. Perelman (61) has been Chairman of the Board of Directors of Revlon, Inc. and of Products
Corporation since June 1998 and a Director of Revlon, Inc. and of Products Corporation since their
respective formations in 1992. Mr. Perelman has been Chairman of the Board of Managers, Manager and
Chief Executive Ofﬁcer of REV Holdings, which ﬁles reports pursuant to the Exchange Act, since
December 2002. He was Chief Executive Ofﬁcer of REV Holdings Inc. (the predecessor of REV
Holdings) since 1997 and Chairman of its Board of Directors from 1993 through December 2002. Mr.
Perelman has been Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Ofﬁcer of MacAndrews & Forbes and
various of its afﬁliates since 1980. Mr. Perelman served as Chairman of the Board of Directors of
Panavision Inc. (‘‘Panavision’’) until September 2003 and thereafter began service as Co-Chairman. Mr.
Perelman is also a Director (or member of the Board of Managers, as applicable) of the following
companies which are required to ﬁle reports pursuant to the Exchange Act: Allied Security Holdings LLC
(‘‘Allied Security’’), M&F Worldwide Corp. (‘‘M&F Worldwide’’), Panavision and Scientiﬁc Games
Corporation (‘‘Scientiﬁc Games’’).

Mr. Stahl (51) has been President and Chief Executive Ofﬁcer of Revlon, Inc. and Products
Corporation since February 2002 and a Director of Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation since March
2002. Mr. Stahl served as President and Chief Operating Ofﬁcer of The Coca-Cola Company (‘‘Coca-
Cola’’) from February 2000 to March 2001. Prior to that, Mr. Stahl held various senior executive positions
at Coca-Cola where he began his career in 1979. Mr. Stahl is also a Director of the Cosmetic, Toiletry, and
Fragrance Association, Vice Chairman of the Board of the United Negro College Fund and is a member
of the Board of Governors of the Boys & Girls Clubs of America.

Mr. Bernikow (64) has been a Director of Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation since September
2003. Prior to his retirement in May 2003, Mr. Bernikow served as the Deputy Chief Executive Ofﬁcer of
Deloitte & Touche LLP (‘‘D&T’’) since 1998. Prior to that, Mr. Bernikow held various senior executive
positions at D&T and various of its predecessor companies, which he joined in 1966. Mr. Bernikow also
serves as a Director and as a member of the Audit Committee of Casual Male Retail Group, Inc. and as
a Director and as Chairman of the Audit Committee of Mack-Cali Realty Corporation, each of which are
required to ﬁle reports pursuant to the Exchange Act.

Mr. Bohan (59) has been a Director of Revlon, Inc. since March 2004. Prior to his retirement in
February 2001, Mr. Bohan was a Managing Director in a high-yield bond sales group of Salomon Smith
Barney, a unit of Citigroup Inc., a global ﬁnancial services holding company, having joined Salomon Smith
Barney in 1980. Mr. Bohan currently serves as a member of the Board of Directors of Arena Brands, Inc.
and Haynes International, Inc., which are both privately-held companies, and of the Board of Directors
of The New York Police & Fire Widows’ & Children’s Beneﬁt Fund. In addition, Mr. Bohan serves on the
audit committee of The New York Police & Fire Widows’ & Children’s Beneﬁt Fund.

Mr. Drapkin (56) has been a Director of Revlon, Inc. and of Products Corporation since their
respective formations in 1992. He has been Vice Chairman of the Board of MacAndrews & Forbes and
various of its afﬁliates since 1987. Mr. Drapkin was a partner in the law ﬁrm of Skadden, Arps, Slate,
Meagher & Flom LLP for more than ﬁve years prior to 1987. Mr. Drapkin is also a Director (or member
of the Board of Managers, as applicable) of the following companies which are required to ﬁle reports
pursuant to the Exchange Act: Allied Security, Anthracite Capital, Inc., Nephros Inc., Playboy
Enterprises, Inc. and SIGA Technologies, Inc.

Professor Feldberg (62) has been a Director of Revlon, Inc. since February 1997. Professor Feldberg
has been the Dean Emeritus and Sanford Bernstein Professor of Leadership and Ethics at Columbia
Business School since July 1, 2004, and was the Dean of Columbia Business School, New York City, from
July 1989 to June 2004. Professor Feldberg is also a Director of the following companies which are
required to ﬁle reports pursuant to the Exchange Act: Federated Department Stores, Inc., PRIMEDIA
Inc. and Sappi Limited. In addition, Professor Feldberg is also a director or trustee of certain registered
investment companies for which UBS Global Asset Management (U.S.) Inc. (formerly known as Brinson
Advisors, Inc.), a wholly-owned subsidiary of UBS AG, or one of its afﬁliates serves as investment
advisor, sub-advisor or manager, and a director of registered investment companies for which UBS
Financial Services Inc. or one of its afﬁliates serves as investment advisor, administrator or manager
(collectively, the ‘‘UBS Funds’’). In addition to being a member of Revlon, Inc.’s Audit Committee,
Professor Feldberg is also an audit committee member of PRIMEDIA Inc. and is a member of the audit
committees of the UBS Funds.

Mr. Gittis (70) has been a Director of Revlon, Inc. since its formation in 1992. Mr. Gittis was a
Director of, and served as the Vice Chairman of, Products Corporation from June 2002 through March
2004. Mr. Gittis was Vice Chairman of the Board of Managers and Manager of REV Holdings, which ﬁles
reports pursuant to the Exchange Act, from December 2002 until March 2004. He was a Director of REV
Holdings Inc. (the predecessor of REV Holdings) from its formation in 1993 through December 2002 and
Vice Chairman of its Board of Directors from March 1997 through December 2002. He has been Vice
Chairman of the Board of MacAndrews & Forbes and various of its afﬁliates since 1985. Mr. Gittis is
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Ofﬁcer of M & F Worldwide. Mr. Gittis is also a
Director of the following companies which are required to ﬁle reports pursuant to the Exchange Act:
Jones Apparel Group, Inc., Panavision and Scientiﬁc Games.

Mr. Landau (74) has been a Director of Revlon, Inc. since June 1996. Prior to his retirement in
February 2003, Mr. Landau was Of Counsel at the law ﬁrm of Wolf, Block, Schorr and Solis-Cohen LLP
(‘‘Wolf, Block’’) since February 1998, and was a Senior Partner of Lowenthal, Landau, Fischer & Bring,
P.C., a predecessor to such ﬁrm, for more than ﬁve years prior to that date. He has been a Director of
Products Corporation since June 1992.

Ms. Robinson (51) has been a Director of Revlon, Inc. since June 1996. Ms. Robinson has been
Chairman of Robinson, Lerer & Montgomery, LLC, a New York City strategic communications
consulting ﬁrm (‘‘RLM’’), since May 1996. Ms. Robinson was Chief Executive Ofﬁcer of RLM from May
1996 until January 2002. In March 2000, RLM was acquired by Young & Rubicam Inc. (‘‘Y&R’’) and Ms.
Robinson has served as Vice Chairman of Y&R since March 2000. In October 2000, Y&R was acquired
by the WPP Group plc (‘‘WPP’’). For more than ﬁve years prior to May 1996, she was Chairman of the
Board and Chief Executive Ofﬁcer of Robinson Lerer Sawyer Miller Group, or its predecessors. Ms.
Robinson also serves as a Director of Black Rock, Inc., which is required to ﬁle reports pursuant to the
Exchange Act.

Mr. Wolfe (65) has been a Director of Revlon, Inc. since March 2004. Mr. Wolfe served as Chairman
and Chief Executive Ofﬁcer of Hershey Foods Corporation (‘‘Hershey’’) from 1994 until his retirement
in December 2001. Mr. Wolfe joined Hershey in 1967 and held various executive positions, including
President and Chief Operating Ofﬁcer, before being appointed its Chairman and Chief Executive Ofﬁcer.
Mr. Wolfe is also a Director and Chairman of the audit committees of the following companies which are
required to ﬁle reports pursuant to the Exchange Act: Adelphia Communications Corporation and
Bausch & Lomb Incorporated. Since January 1, 2005, Mr. Wolfe has served as a member of the Board of
Trustees of various mutual funds managed by Fidelity.

Executive Ofﬁcers

The following table sets forth each of the executive ofﬁcers of Revlon, Inc. as of December 31, 2004,

except for Mr. Kretzman who became an executive ofﬁcer effective in March 2005:

Name

Jack L. Stahl
Thomas E. McGuire
Douglas H. Greeff
Robert K. Kretzman

Position

President and Chief Executive Ofﬁcer
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Ofﬁcer
Former Executive Vice President – Strategic Finance
Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Ofﬁcer, General Counsel
and Secretary

The following sets forth the ages, positions held with Revlon, Inc. and selected biographical

information for the executive ofﬁcers of Revlon, Inc., in each case as of December 31, 2004:

Mr. Stahl (51) has been President and Chief Executive Ofﬁcer of Revlon, Inc. and Products
Corporation since February 2002 and a Director of Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation since March
2002. Mr. Stahl served as President and Chief Operating Ofﬁcer of Coca-Cola from February 2000 to
March 2001. Prior to that, Mr. Stahl held various senior executive positions at Coca-Cola where he began
his career in 1979. Mr. Stahl is also a Director of the Cosmetic, Toiletry, and Fragrance Association and
Vice Chairman of the Board of the United Negro College Fund and is a member of the Board of
Governors of the Boys & Girls Clubs of America.

Mr. McGuire (50) has been Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Ofﬁcer of Revlon, Inc. and
Products Corporation since August 2003. Mr. McGuire was the Founder and Chief Executive Ofﬁcer of
Human Capital Formation, LLC from August 2001 until August 2003. Mr. McGuire was the Chief
Operating Ofﬁcer of Zyman Marketing Group from July 2000 until May 2001. From March 1982 until
June 2000, Mr. McGuire held various professional staff and senior ﬁnancial executive positions at
Coca-Cola.

Mr. Greeff (47) was Executive Vice President – Strategic Finance of Revlon, Inc. and Products
Corporation from August 2003 until February 2005 when he ceased employment with the Company. He
also served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Ofﬁcer of Revlon, Inc. and Products
Corporation from May 2000 until August 2003. From September 1998 to May 2000, Mr. Greeff was
Managing Director, Fixed Income Global Loans, and Co-head of Leverage Finance at Salomon Smith
Barney Inc. From January 1994 until August 1998, he was Managing Director, Global Loans and Head
of Leverage and Acquisition Finance at Citibank N.A.

Mr. Kretzman (53) has been Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Ofﬁcer, General Counsel and
Secretary of Revlon, Inc. and of Products Corporation since December 2003. Mr. Kretzman served as
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Revlon, Inc. and of Products Corporation from
January 2000 until December 2003. Prior to becoming General Counsel, Mr. Kretzman served as Senior
Vice President, Deputy General Counsel and Secretary from March 1998 to January 2000, as Vice
President, Deputy General Counsel and Secretary from January 1997 to March 1998, and as Vice
President and Secretary from September 1992 to January 1997. Mr. Kretzman joined the Company in 1988
as Senior Counsel responsible for mergers and acquisitions. Mr. Kretzman has also served as the
Company’s Chief Compliance Ofﬁcer since January 2000.

Compensation of Directors

Directors who currently are not receiving compensation as ofﬁcers or employees of Revlon, Inc. or
any of its afﬁliates (‘‘Non-Employee Directors’’) are paid an annual retainer fee of $35,000, payable in
quarterly installments, and a fee of $1,000 for each meeting of the Board of Directors or any committee
thereof that they attend. In May 2004, the Compensation Committee, after due consideration and
consultation with Mercer, approved a compensation structure for Revlon, Inc.’s Non-Employee Directors
pursuant to which, in addition to annual retainer fees and meeting fees, annual Awards may be made to
such directors. Under the program, the Compensation Committee will determine a maximum face value
of the annual option grant each year for each director (which face value amount cannot exceed $100,000
in any given year and was set at $75,000 for 2004), and the face value amount is divided by the closing
price on the NYSE of Revlon, Inc.’s Class A Common Stock on the date of the grant to determine the
number of options to be granted to the director. On May 10, 2004, the Compensation Committee granted
each of the Non-Employee Directors options to purchase 22,060 shares of Revlon, Inc.’s Class A Common
Stock, which options consist of non-qualiﬁed options having a term of seven years, become exercisable as
to 25% of the Award on December 31, 2004 and thereafter become cumulatively exercisable in additional
25% increments on each subsequent December 31st, and which have an exercise price equal to $3.40, the
per share closing market price on the NYSE of Revlon, Inc.’s Class A Common Stock on the grant date.

In recognition of their increased responsibilities, members of Revlon, Inc.’s Audit Committee are
paid an annual Audit Committee retainer fee of $10,000, in addition to the annual retainer fee for Board
membership, and a per meeting fee of $1,500 for each meeting of the Audit Committee that they attend.

Messrs. Bernikow and Landau are also non-employee members of the Board of Directors of Products
Corporation, Revlon, Inc.’s wholly-owned subsidiary, for which they are paid an annual retainer fee of
$25,000 per annum and a meeting fee of $1,000 for each meeting of the Board of Directors of Products
Corporation that they attend.

Audit Committee and Audit Committee Financial Expert

Revlon, Inc.’s Board of Directors has determined that Revlon, Inc.’s Audit Committee, consisting of
Linda Gosden Robinson, Alan S. Bernikow, Paul J. Bohan, Meyer Feldberg and Edward J. Landau, has
at least one ‘‘audit committee ﬁnancial expert’’. The Board determined that Alan S. Bernikow, based upon
his experience, training and education, qualiﬁes as an audit committee ﬁnancial expert in that he has (a)
an understanding of generally accepted accounting principles (‘‘GAAP’’) and ﬁnancial statements; (b) the
ability to assess the general application of GAAP in connection with accounting for estimates, accruals
and reserves; (c) experience preparing, auditing, analyzing or evaluating ﬁnancial statements that present
a breadth and level of complexity of accounting issues that are generally comparable to the breadth and
complexity of issues that can reasonably be expected to be raised by the Company’s ﬁnancial statements
as well as experience actively supervising one or more persons engaged in such activities; (d) an
understanding of internal controls and procedures for ﬁnancial reporting; and (e) an understanding of
audit committee functions. For certain biographical data concerning Mr. Bernikow, see Item 10,
‘‘Directors and Executive Ofﬁcers of the Registrant’’. The Board further determined that Mr. Bernikow
and the other members of the Audit Committee are independent of management pursuant to applicable
SEC rules and NYSE listing standards regarding the independence of board and audit committee
members, including the independence principles set forth in the Revlon, Inc. Board Guidelines for
Assessing Director Independence, which are posted on the Company’s website at www.revloninc.com.

Senior Financial Ofﬁcer Code of Ethics

The Company has a written Code of Business Conduct (the ‘‘Code of Business Conduct’’) that
includes a code of ethics (the ‘‘Senior Financial Ofﬁcer Code of Ethics’’) that applies to the Company’s
Chief Executive Ofﬁcer and senior ﬁnancial ofﬁcers (including the Company’s Chief Financial Ofﬁcer,
Controller and persons performing similar functions) (collectively, the ‘‘Senior Financial Ofﬁcers’’). In
addition to the Code of Business Conduct and the Senior Financial Ofﬁcer Code of Ethics being available
on the Company’s website, www.revloninc.com, the Company will provide a copy of the Senior Financial
Ofﬁcer Code of Ethics, without charge, upon written request to Robert K. Kretzman, Executive Vice

President and Chief Legal Ofﬁcer, Revlon, Inc., 237 Park Avenue, New York NY, 10017. If the Company
changes the Senior Financial Ofﬁcer Code of Ethics in any material respect or waives any provision of the
Senior Financial Ofﬁcer Code of Ethics for any of its Senior Financial Ofﬁcers, the Company expects to
provide the public with notice of any such change or waiver by publishing an appropriate description of
such event on its corporate website, www.revloninc.com, or by other appropriate means as required or
permitted under applicable rules of the Commission. The Company does not currently expect to make any
such waivers.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

The following table sets forth information for the years indicated concerning the compensation
awarded to, earned by or paid to the persons who served as Chief Executive Ofﬁcer of the Company
during 2004 and the four most highly paid executive ofﬁcers (see footnote (a) below), other than the Chief
Executive Ofﬁcer, who served as executive ofﬁcers of the Company during 2004 (collectively, the ‘‘Named
Executive Ofﬁcers’’), for services rendered in all capacities to the Company and its subsidiaries during
such periods.

Summary Compensation Table

Annual Compensation (a)

Long-Term
Compensation Awards

Name and Principal Position

Year

Salary
($)

Bonus
($)

Other
Annual
Compensation
($)

Restricted
Stock
Awards
($) (b)

Securities
Underlying
Options

All Other
Compensation
($)

Jack L. Stahl . . . . . . . . . . 2004 1,300,000
2003 1,300,000
2002 1,125,000 1,300,000

President and Chief
Executive Ofﬁcer (c)

95,677
— 103,244
82,999

455,000

8,181,000 5,520,000
— 100,000
400,000

3,820,000

173,631
173,277
3,966,746

Thomas E. McGuire . . . 2004
2003
Executive Vice

500,000
182,692

735,000
—

88,973
18,678

590,850
150,500

995,000
100,000

128,631
25,224

President and Chief
Financial Ofﬁcer (d)

Douglas H. Greeff . . . . . 2004
2003
2002

Former Executive
Vice President –
Strategic Finance (e)

889,817
884,833
811,365

313,980
190,720
600,960

15,529
13,820
16,670

—
—
226,800

— 1,009,264
14,056
—
8,974
75,000

(a) The amounts shown in Annual Compensation for 2004, 2003 and 2002 reﬂect salary, bonus and other annual compensation
(including, as required to be disclosed in accordance with Item 402 of Regulation S-K promulgated under the Exchange Act,
perquisites and other personal beneﬁts valued in excess of $50,000) and amounts reimbursed for payment of taxes awarded to,
earned by or paid to the persons listed for services rendered to the Company and its subsidiaries. For the periods reported, the
Company had an Executive Bonus Plan in which executives participated (including Messrs. Stahl, McGuire and Greeff) (see
‘‘— Employment Agreements and Termination of Employment Arrangements’’). The Executive Bonus Plan provided for
payment of cash compensation upon the achievement of predetermined business and personal performance objectives during
the calendar year that are established by the Compensation Committee, except that in respect of 2003, as a result of the
non-attainment of bonus objectives for that year, the Compensation Committee determined that no bonuses would be payable
under the Executive Bonus Plan or any other incentive compensation plan of the Company for that year. In addition, no salary
increases were provided in 2004 and the Company’s bonus plan target for 2004 was set at 50% of the regular bonus target. For
2004, the Company is reporting the compensation of Messrs. Stahl, McGuire and Greeff, its only executive ofﬁcers during 2004.
In February 2005, Mr. Greeff, the Company’s former Executive Vice President – Strategic Finance, ceased employment with
the Company.

(b) See footnotes (c), (d) and (e) below for information concerning the number, value and vesting schedules on restricted stock
awards to the Named Executive Ofﬁcers under the Stock Plan. The options granted to Named Executive Ofﬁcers during 2004
pursuant to the Stock Plan are discussed below under ‘‘Option Grants in the Last Fiscal Year.’’

(c) Mr. Stahl became President and Chief Executive Ofﬁcer of the Company during February 2002. In March 2005, Mr. Stahl will
receive a bonus of $455,000 in respect of 2004 pursuant to the terms of the Executive Bonus Plan, and based upon the
achievement of certain predetermined, objective performance-based bonus criteria that had been established in early 2004 by
the Compensation Committee. The amount shown for Mr. Stahl under Other Annual Compensation for 2004 includes $95,677
in respect of gross ups for taxes on imputed income arising out of (x) personal use of a Company-provided automobile, (y)
premiums paid or reimbursed by the Company in respect of life insurance and (z) reimbursements for mortgage principal and
interest payments pursuant to Mr. Stahl’s employment agreement, as amended. In addition, although not required to be
disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table above pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, Mr. Stahl’s compensation for
2004 also included (i) $21,188 in respect of use of a Company-provided automobile, (ii) $11,886 in Company-paid contributions
under the Company’s Executive Medical Plan, and (iii) $8,500 for tax preparation expenses in 2004. The amount shown under
All Other Compensation for 2004 reﬂects (i) $16,513 in respect of life insurance premiums, (ii) $135,968 of additional
compensation in respect of interest and principal payments on a mortgage loan which Products Corporation made to Mr. Stahl
on May 20, 2002 (prior to the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and its prohibitions on loans to executive ofﬁcers)
to purchase a principal residence in the New York metropolitan area pursuant to his employment agreement (see ‘‘—
Employment Agreements and Termination of Employment Arrangements’’), (iii) $6,150 in respect of matching contributions
under the Revlon Employees Savings, Investment and Proﬁt Sharing Plan (a 401(k) savings plan and, as amended and restated

from time to time, the ‘‘Savings Plan’’), and (iv) $15,000 in respect of matching contributions under the Revlon Excess Savings
Plan for Key Employees. On April 14, 2004, Mr. Stahl was awarded a grant of 2,700,000 shares of restricted stock under the
Stock Plan. The value of the restricted stock Awards granted to Mr. Stahl on April 14, 2004 as reﬂected in the table is based
on the $3.03 per share closing price of Revlon, Inc.’s Class A Common Stock on the NYSE on the grant date. The value of
these restricted stock Awards as of December 31, 2004 was $6,210,000, based on a per share price of $2.30, the closing price
of Revlon, Inc.’s Class A Common Stock on the NYSE on December 31, 2004. Provided Mr. Stahl remains continuously
employed by the Company, or if he is terminated by the Company without ‘‘cause’’ or if he terminates his employment for
‘‘good reason’’ (as each such term is described in Mr. Stahl’s employment agreement, as amended), his 2004 restricted stock
Award will vest in one-third increments beginning on April 14, 2005 and thereafter as to an additional one-third on each
subsequent anniversary of the grant date. No dividends will be paid on unvested restricted stock granted to Mr. Stahl in 2004.

The amount shown for Mr. Stahl under Other Annual Compensation for 2003 includes $103,244 in respect of gross ups for taxes
on imputed income arising out of (i) personal use of a Company-provided automobile, (ii) premiums paid or reimbursed by
the Company in respect of life insurance and (iii) reimbursements for mortgage principal and interest payments pursuant to
Mr. Stahl’s employment agreement, as amended. The amount shown under All Other Compensation for 2003 reﬂects (i)
$16,309 in respect of life insurance premiums, (ii) $135,968 of additional compensation in respect of interest and principal
payments on a mortgage loan which Products Corporation made to Mr. Stahl on May 20, 2002 to purchase a principal residence
in the New York metropolitan area pursuant to his employment agreement (see ‘‘— Employment Agreements and Termination
of Employment Arrangements’’), (iii) $6,000 in respect of matching contributions under the Savings Plan and (iv) $15,000 in
respect of matching contributions under the Revlon Excess Savings Plan for Key Employees.

Mr. Stahl received a guaranteed bonus of $1,300,000 in respect of 2002 pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement.
The amount shown for Mr. Stahl under Other Annual Compensation for 2002 includes $82,999 in respect of gross ups for taxes
on imputed income arising out of (i) personal use of a Company-provided automobile, (ii) premiums paid or reimbursed by
the Company in respect of life insurance, (iii) reimbursements for mortgage principal and interest payments pursuant to Mr.
Stahl’s employment agreement and (iv) relocation expenses paid or reimbursed by the Company in 2002. The amount shown
under All Other Compensation for 2002 reﬂects (i) $7,350 in Company-paid relocation expenses, (ii) $13,081 in respect of life
insurance premiums, (iii) $79,315 of additional compensation in respect of interest and principal payments on a mortgage loan
which Products Corporation made to Mr. Stahl on May 20, 2002 to purchase a principal residence in the New York metropolitan
area pursuant to his employment agreement (see ‘‘— Employment Agreements and Termination of Employment Arrange-
ments’’), (iv) $6,000 in respect of matching contributions under the Savings Plan, (v) $15,000 in respect of matching
contributions under the Revlon Excess Savings Plan for Key Employees and (vi) $3,846,000 for imputed income in connection
with receipt of an Award of restricted stock reﬂected in the Summary Compensation Table as to which he made an election
pursuant to Section 83(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (as amended, the ‘‘Code’’).

On February 17, 2002 (the ‘‘2002 Stahl Grant Date’’), Mr. Stahl was awarded a grant of 470,000 shares of restricted stock under
the Stock Plan and 530,000 shares of restricted stock under the Revlon, Inc. 2002 Supplemental Stock Plan (the ‘‘Supplemental
Stock Plan’’). The value of the restricted stock Awards granted to Mr. Stahl on the 2002 Stahl Grant Date as reﬂected in the
table is based on the $3.82 per share closing price of Revlon, Inc.’s Class A Common Stock on the NYSE on the 2002 Stahl
Grant Date. The value of these restricted stock Awards as of December 31, 2004 was $2,300,000, based on a per share price
of $2.30, the closing price of Revlon, Inc.’s Class A Common Stock on the NYSE on December 31, 2004. Provided Mr. Stahl
remains continuously employed by the Company, or if he is terminated by the Company without ‘‘cause’’ or if he terminates
his employment for ‘‘good reason’’ (as each such term is described in Mr. Stahl’s employment agreement, as amended), his 2002
restricted stock Award will vest as to one-third of the restricted shares on the day after which the 20-day average of the closing
price of Revlon, Inc.’s Class A Common Stock on the NYSE equals or exceeds $20.00 per share, an additional one-third of such
restricted shares will vest on the day after which such 20-day average closing price equals or exceeds $25.00 per share and the
balance will vest on the day after which such 20-day average closing price equals or exceeds $30.00 per share, provided (i)
subject to clause (ii) below, no portion of Mr. Stahl’s restricted stock Award will vest until the second anniversary of the 2002
Stahl Grant Date, unless such 20-day average closing price has equaled or exceeded $25.00 per share, (ii) all of the shares of
restricted stock awarded to Mr. Stahl will vest immediately in the event of a ‘‘change in control’’ as deﬁned in Mr. Stahl’s
restricted stock agreement and (iii) on the second and fourth anniversaries of the 2002 Stahl Grant Date, restrictions shall lapse
as to an additional 250,000 shares of such restricted stock and on the ﬁfth anniversary of the 2002 Stahl Grant Date, restrictions
shall lapse as to 500,000 shares of such restricted stock as to which restrictions had not previously lapsed. In accordance with
the terms of the grant, on June 18, 2004, the second anniversary of the 2002 Stahl Grant Date, restrictions lapsed as to 250,000
shares of Mr. Stahl’s restricted stock award. In the event that, prior to the ﬁfth anniversary of the 2002 Stahl Grant Date, and
subject to clause (ii) of the prior sentence, Mr. Stahl’s employment with the Company terminates as a result of Mr. Stahl’s
‘‘disability’’ (as such term is deﬁned or described in Mr. Stahl’s employment agreement, as amended), restrictions shall lapse
with respect to an additional number of shares of restricted stock, if any, such that the aggregate number of shares of restricted
stock as to which restrictions shall have lapsed will equal the greater of (i) 250,000 and (ii) the product of (X) 1,000,000 and
(Y) a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of full calendar months during which Mr. Stahl was employed after the
2002 Stahl Grant Date (disregarding service prior to March 1, 2002) and the denominator of which is 60. In addition, if Mr.
Stahl’s employment is terminated by Mr. Stahl for ‘‘good reason’’ or is terminated by the Company other than for ‘‘cause’’ or
‘‘disability’’ (as each such term is deﬁned or described in Mr. Stahl’s employment agreement, as amended) during the 120-day
period immediately preceding the date of a ‘‘change in control’’ (as deﬁned in Mr. Stahl’s restricted stock agreement), then the
shares of restricted stock previously forfeited upon such termination of employment will be reinstated and the restrictions
relating thereto will lapse and such shares will be deemed fully vested as of the date of the change in control. In the event that
cash or any in-kind distributions are made in respect of Revlon, Inc.’s Common Stock prior to the lapse of the restrictions
relating to any of Mr. Stahl’s restricted stock granted to Mr. Stahl on the 2002 Stahl Grant Date as to which the restrictions have
not lapsed, such dividends will be held by the Company and paid to Mr. Stahl when, and if, the restrictions on such restricted
stock lapse.

Mr. Stahl’s employment agreement was amended on December 17, 2004 to provide for continued vesting of equity awards
previously granted to Mr. Stahl in the event that he is terminated by the Company without ‘‘cause’’ or if Mr. Stahl shall
terminate his employment for ‘‘good reason’’ (as each such term is deﬁned or described in Mr. Stahl’s employment agreement,

as amended). Speciﬁcally, as described above, in the event that Mr. Stahl is terminated without ‘‘cause’’ or if he terminates his
employment for ‘‘good reason,’’ the stock option awards granted to Mr. Stahl by the Company on February 17, 2002, May 19,
2003 and April 14, 2004, and the restricted stock awards granted to Mr. Stahl on February 17, 2002 and April 14, 2004, shall
continue to vest in accordance with their terms as if Mr. Stahl’s employment had not been terminated and he had remained
employed by the Company, and those stock option awards shall remain exercisable until the later of (i) one year after such
existing option award becomes 100% fully vested and exercisable or (ii) 18 months following Mr. Stahl’s termination of
employment, but in no event beyond the original option term of each such award.

(d) Mr. McGuire became Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Ofﬁcer of the Company during August 2003. In March
2005, Mr. McGuire will receive a bonus of $135,000 in respect of 2004 pursuant to the terms of the Executive Bonus Plan,
$70,875 of which will be based upon the achievement of certain predetermined, objective performance-based bonus criteria
that had been established in early 2004 by the Compensation Committee and $64,125 of which will be a discretionary bonus
approved by the Compensation Committee in recognition of, among other things, Mr. McGuire’s signiﬁcant contributions to
the Company’s reﬁnancing activities during 2004. In addition, pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement, in January
2005 Mr. McGuire received a $600,000 retention incentive in respect of 2004, intended to assist him towards funding the
purchase of a home in the New York metropolitan area (see ‘‘— Employment Agreements and Termination of Employment
Arrangements’’). The amount shown for Mr. McGuire under Other Annual Compensation for 2004 includes $88,973 in respect
of gross ups for taxes on imputed income arising out of relocation expenses paid or reimbursed by the Company in 2004. In
addition, although not required to be disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table above pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation
S-K, Mr. McGuire’s compensation for 2004 also included $15,000 in respect of a cash car allowance. The amount shown under
All Other Compensation for 2004 reﬂects (i) $119,835 in Company-paid expenses for temporary corporate housing and travel
to and from Atlanta pending his relocation to the New York metropolitan area and (ii) $2,546 in respect of life insurance
premiums. On April 14, 2004, Mr. McGuire was awarded a grant of 195,000 shares of restricted stock under the Stock Plan.
The value of the restricted stock Awards granted to Mr. McGuire on April 14, 2004 as reﬂected in the table is based on the
$3.03 per share closing price of Revlon, Inc.’s Class A Common Stock on the NYSE on that date. The value of these restricted
stock Awards as of December 31, 2004 was $448,500, based on a per share price of $2.30, the closing price of Revlon, Inc.’s
Class A Common Stock on the NYSE on December 31, 2004. Provided Mr. McGuire remains continuously employed by the
Company, his 2004 restricted stock Award will vest in one-third increments beginning on April 14, 2005 and thereafter as to
an additional one-third on each subsequent anniversary of the grant date. No dividends will be paid on the unvested restricted
stock granted to Mr. McGuire in 2004.

On August 18, 2003 (the ‘‘2003 McGuire Grant Date’’), Mr. McGuire was awarded 50,000 shares of restricted stock under the
Stock Plan. The value of the restricted stock Awards granted to Mr. McGuire on the 2003 McGuire Grant Date as reﬂected
in the table is based on the $3.01 per share closing price of Revlon, Inc.’s Class A Common Stock on the NYSE on the 2003
McGuire Grant Date. The value of these restricted stock Awards as of December 31, 2004 was $115,000, based on a per share
price of $2.30, the closing price of Revlon, Inc.’s Class A Common Stock on the NYSE on December 31, 2004. The amount
shown for Mr. McGuire under Other Annual Compensation for 2003 includes $18,678 in respect of gross ups for taxes on
imputed income arising out of relocation expenses paid or reimbursed by the Company in 2003. The amount shown under All
Other Compensation for 2003 reﬂects (i) $24,732 in Company-paid relocation expenses and (ii) $492 in respect of premiums
under the Company’s basic life insurance program. Provided Mr. McGuire remains continuously employed by the Company,
his 2003 restricted stock Award will vest as to one-third of the restricted shares on the day after which the 20-day average of
the closing price of Revlon, Inc.’s Class A Common Stock on the NYSE equals or exceeds $20.00 per share, an additional
one-third of such restricted shares will vest on the day after which such 20-day average closing price equals or exceeds $25.00
per share and the balance will vest on the day after which such 20-day average closing price equals or exceeds $30.00 per share,
provided (i) subject to clause (ii) below, no portion of Mr. McGuire’s 2003 restricted stock Award will vest until the second
anniversary of the 2003 McGuire Grant Date, (ii) all of the shares of restricted stock awarded to Mr. McGuire in 2003 will vest
immediately in the event of a ‘‘change in control’’ (as deﬁned in Mr. McGuire’s restricted stock agreement) and (iii) all of the
shares of restricted stock granted to Mr. McGuire in 2003 that have not previously vested will fully vest on the third anniversary
of the 2003 McGuire Grant Date. No dividends will be paid on the unvested restricted stock granted to Mr. McGuire in 2003.

(e) Mr. Greeff served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Ofﬁcer of the Company during all of 2002 and until August
2003, when he became Executive Vice President – Strategic Finance of the Company. In February 2005, Mr. Greeff ceased
employment with the Company. In March 2005, Mr. Greeff will receive a bonus of $133,500 in respect of 2004 pursuant to the
terms of the Executive Bonus Plan, and based upon the achievement of certain predetermined, objective performance-based
bonus criteria that had been established in early 2004 by the Compensation Committee. In 2004, Mr. Greeff also received a
bonus of $180,480 pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement, as a special bonus in respect of repayment of a loan
made by the Company to Mr. Greeff when he joined the Company in 2000, prior to the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and its prohibition on loans to executive ofﬁcers (the ‘‘2000 Loan’’) (see ‘‘— Employment Agreements and
Termination of Employment Arrangements’’). The amount shown for Mr. Greeff under Other Annual Compensation for 2004
includes $15,529 in respect of gross ups for taxes on imputed income arising out of personal use of a Company-provided
automobile. In addition, although not required to be disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table above pursuant to Item
402 of Regulation S-K, Mr. Greeff’s compensation for 2004 also included $21,005 in respect of use of a Company-provided
automobile and $11,886 in Company-paid contributions under the Company’s Executive Medical Plan in 2004. The amount
shown for Mr. Greeff under All Other Compensation for 2004 reﬂects (i) $3,114 in respect of life insurance premiums,
(ii) $6,150 in respect of matching contributions under the Savings Plan and (iii) $1,000,000 to be paid in March 2005 pursuant
to the terms of Mr. Greeff’s employment agreement and the Greeff Separation Agreement (as deﬁned below), based upon the
completion of objectives relating to the successful completion of the Revlon Exchange Transactions and the reﬁnancing of
Products Corporation’s 2001 Credit Agreement with the 2004 Credit Agreement during 2004. (see ‘‘— Employment
Agreements and Termination of Employment Arrangements’’).

In 2003, Mr. Greeff received a bonus of $190,720 pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement as a special bonus in
respect of repayment of the 2000 Loan (see ‘‘— Employment Agreements and Termination of Employment Arrangements’’).
The amount shown for Mr. Greeff under Other Annual Compensation for 2003 includes $13,820 in respect of gross ups for
taxes on imputed income arising out of personal use of a Company-provided automobile. The amount shown for Mr. Greeff

under All Other Compensation for 2003 reﬂects (i) $3,056 in respect of life insurance premiums, (ii) $6,000 in respect of
matching contributions under the Savings Plan and (iii) $5,000 in respect of reimbursement of expenses in connection with an
amendment of Mr. Greeff’s employment agreement.

In 2002, Mr. Greeff received a bonus of $600,960, of which $200,960 was paid pursuant to the terms of his employment
agreement as a special bonus in respect of repayment of the 2000 Loan (see ‘‘— Employment Agreements and Termination
of Employment Arrangements’’) and the balance of $400,000 was a discretionary bonus paid in respect of 2002 pursuant to the
Executive Bonus Plan. The amount shown for Mr. Greeff under Other Annual Compensation for 2002 includes $16,670 in
respect of gross ups for taxes on imputed income arising out of personal use of a Company-provided automobile. The amount
shown under All Other Compensation for 2002 reﬂects (i) $2,974 in respect of life insurance premiums and (ii) $6,000 in respect
of matching contributions under the Savings Plan. On September 17, 2002 (the ‘‘2002 Greeff Grant Date’’), Mr. Greeff was
awarded a grant of 60,000 shares of restricted stock under the Stock Plan. The value of the restricted stock Awards granted to
Mr. Greeff on the 2002 Greeff Grant Date as reﬂected in the table is based on the $3.78 per share closing price of Revlon, Inc.’s
Class A Common Stock on the NYSE on the 2002 Greeff Grant Date. The value of these restricted stock Awards as of
December 31, 2004 was $138,000, based on a per share price of $2.30, the closing price of Revlon, Inc.’s Class A Common Stock
on the NYSE on December 31, 2004. As provided in the Greeff Separation Agreement (as deﬁned below), Mr. Greeff’s 2002
restricted stock Award will vest as to one-third of the restricted shares on the day after which the 20-day average of the closing
price of Revlon, Inc.’s Class A Common Stock on the NYSE equals or exceeds $20.00 per share, an additional one-third of such
restricted shares will vest on the day after which such 20-day average closing price equals or exceeds $25.00 per share and the
balance will vest on the day after which such 20-day average closing price equals or exceeds $30.00 per share, provided (i)
subject to clause (ii) below, no portion of Mr. Greeff’s 2002 restricted stock Award will vest until the second anniversary of the
2002 Greeff Grant Date, (ii) all of the shares of restricted stock awarded to Mr. Greeff in 2002 will vest immediately in the event
of a ‘‘change in control’’ (as deﬁned in Mr. Greeff’s restricted stock agreement) and (iii) all of the shares of restricted stock
granted to Mr. Greeff in 2002 which have not previously vested will fully vest on the third anniversary of the 2002 Greeff Grant
Date. No dividends will be paid on the unvested restricted stock granted to Mr. Greeff in 2002.

Mr. Greeff received a bonus of $511,200 in respect of 2001, of which $211,200 was paid pursuant to the terms of his employment
agreement as a special bonus in respect of repayment of the 2000 Loan (see ‘‘— Employment Agreements and Termination
of Employment Arrangements’’) and the balance of $300,000 was paid in respect of 2001 pursuant to the Executive Bonus Plan
as a short-term cash bonus in recognition of the Company’s successful reﬁnancing of its credit agreement in 2001 (which was
subsequently reﬁnanced in July 2004) and issuing Products Corporation’s 12% Senior Secured Notes (which were redeemed in
full during 2004). $150,000 of Mr. Greeff’s bonus in respect of 2001 was paid in 2002 and the remaining $150,000 was paid in
2003.

OPTION GRANTS IN THE LAST FISCAL YEAR

During 2004, the following grants of stock options were made pursuant to the Stock Plan to the

Named Executive Ofﬁcers:

Name

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options Granted
(#)

Individual Grants
Percent of
Total Options
Granted to
Employees In
Fiscal Year

Exercise or
Base Price
($/Sh)

Jack L. Stahl . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Thomas E. McGuire . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Douglas H. Greeff . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5,520,000
995,000
—

22.51%
4.06%
—

3.03
3.03
—

Grant
Date
Value (a)
Grant
Date
Present
Value
($)

11,476,080
2,068,605
—

Expiration
Date

4/14/11
4/14/11
—

The options granted to Messrs. Stahl and McGuire in 2004 under the Stock Plan were awarded on
April 14, 2004 and consist of non-qualiﬁed options having a term of 7 years. The options vested 25% on
December 31, 2004, will continue to vest in additional 25% increments on each December 31st thereafter
and will become 100% vested on December 31, 2007. The options have an exercise price equal to $3.03,
the per share closing price on the NYSE of Revlon, Inc.’s Class A Common Stock on such grant date, as
indicated in the table above.

(a) Grant Date Present Values were calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The model as applied used April 14,
2004 with respect to options granted to Messrs. Stahl and McGuire on such date. Stock option models require a prediction
about the future movement of stock price. The following assumptions were made for purposes of calculating Grant Date
Present Values: (i) a risk-free rate of return of 3.95%, which was the rate as of April 14, 2004 for the U.S. Treasury Zero
Coupon Bond issue with a remaining term similar to the expected term of the options; (ii) stock price volatility of 68.99% based
upon the volatility of the stock price of Revlon, Inc.’s Class A Common Stock; (iii) a constant dividend rate of zero percent;
and (iv) that the options normally would be exercised seven years from the grant date. No adjustments to the theoretical value
were made to reﬂect the waiting period, if any, prior to vesting of the stock options or the transferability (or restrictions related
thereto) of the stock options. The real value of the options in the table depends upon the actual performance of Revlon, Inc.’s
Class A Common Stock during the applicable period and upon when they are exercised.

AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES IN LAST
FISCAL YEAR AND FISCAL YEAR-END OPTION VALUES

The following chart shows the number of stock options exercised during 2004 and the 2004 year-end

value of the stock options held by the Named Executive Ofﬁcers:

Name

Shares
Acquired on
Exercise
During 2004

Value
Realized
During 2004

Jack L. Stahl . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Thomas E. McGuire . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Douglas H. Greeff . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

—
—
—

Number of Securities
Underlying Unexercised
Options at Fiscal
Year-End
Exercisable/
Unexercisable
at December 31, 2004 (#)

1,405,000/4,615,000
273,750/821,250
179,167/45,833

Value of In-The-Money
Options at Fiscal
Year-End
Exercisable/Unexercisable
at December 31, 2004 (a) ($)

—
—
—

(a) Amounts shown represent the difference between the exercise price of the options (exercisable or unexercisable, as the case
may be) and the market value of the underlying shares of Revlon, Inc.’s Class A Common Stock at year end, calculated using
$2.30, the December 31, 2004 closing price on the NYSE of Revlon, Inc.’s Class A Common Stock. As the closing price of
Revlon, Inc.’s Class A Common Stock on December 31, 2004 was less than the exercise price of the stock options referred to
in the table above, the options were not in-the-money as of that date and, accordingly, had no value. The actual value, if any,
an executive may realize upon exercise of a stock option depends upon the amount by which the market price of shares of
Revlon, Inc.’s Class A Common Stock exceeds the exercise price per share when the stock options are exercised.

Employment Agreements and Termination of Employment Arrangements

Each of Messrs. Stahl and McGuire has, and Mr. Greeff had, an executive employment agreement

with Products Corporation.

Mr. Stahl’s employment agreement, as amended (as so amended, his ‘‘employment agreement’’),
provides that he will serve as President and Chief Executive Ofﬁcer at a base salary of not less than
$1,300,000 per annum, and that he receive a bonus of not less than $1,300,000 in respect of 2002 (which
bonus was paid in February 2003) and grants of 1,000,000 shares of restricted stock and 400,000 options
upon joining the Company in 2002 (which grants were made on the 2002 Stahl Grant Date). The initial
term of Mr. Stahl’s employment agreement, as amended, ends on February 16, 2008, provided, however,
that at any time on or after February 17, 2005, Products Corporation may terminate Mr. Stahl’s
employment by 36 months’ prior written notice of non-renewal of the agreement.

Mr. Stahl’s employment agreement provides for participation in the Executive Bonus Plan and other
executive beneﬁt plans on a basis equivalent to other senior executives of the Company generally. Mr.
Stahl’s employment agreement provides for Company-paid supplemental disability insurance and
supplemental term life insurance coverage with a death beneﬁt of $10,000,000 during employment. The
employment agreement for Mr. Stahl also provides for protection of Company conﬁdential information
and includes a non-compete obligation.

Mr. Stahl’s employment agreement provides that in the event of termination of the term by Mr. Stahl
for ‘‘good reason’’ (as deﬁned in Mr. Stahl’s employment agreement), or by the Company (otherwise than
for ‘‘cause’’ or ‘‘disability’’ as each such term is deﬁned or described in Mr. Stahl’s employment
agreement), Mr. Stahl would be entitled, at his election, to severance pursuant to Products Corporation’s
Executive Severance Policy (see ‘‘— Executive Severance Policy’’) (other than the six-month limit on
lump sum payments provided for in such policy, which six-month limit provision would not apply to Mr.
Stahl); or continued payments of base salary, continued participation in the Company’s life insurance plan
(which life insurance coverage is subject to a limit of two years) and medical plans subject to the terms
of such plans, and continued Company-paid supplemental term life insurance, in each case through the
date occurring 36 months after the date of notice of non-renewal, or in the case of medical plan
participation only, until such earlier date on which Mr. Stahl were to become covered by like plans of
another company. In addition, Mr. Stahl’s employment agreement provides that if he remains employed
by Products Corporation or its afﬁliates until age 60, then upon any subsequent retirement he will be
entitled to a supplemental pension beneﬁt in a sufﬁcient amount so that his annual pension beneﬁt from
all qualiﬁed and non-qualiﬁed pension plans of Products Corporation and its afﬁliates, as well as any such
plans of Mr. Stahl’s past employers or their afﬁliates (expressed as a straight life annuity), equals $500,000.
If Mr. Stahl’s employment were to terminate on or after February 28, 2005 and prior to February 28, 2006,
then he would receive 24.99% of the supplemental pension beneﬁt otherwise payable pursuant to his
employment agreement and thereafter an additional 8.33% would accrue as of each February 28th on
which Mr. Stahl is still employed (but in no event more than would have been payable to Mr. Stahl under
the foregoing provision had he retired at age 60). Mr. Stahl would not receive any supplemental pension
beneﬁt and any amounts then being paid for supplemental pension beneﬁts would immediately cease if
he were to materially breach his employment agreement or be terminated by the Company for ‘‘cause’’
(as deﬁned in Mr. Stahl’s employment agreement). Mr. Stahl’s employment agreement provides for
continuation of group life insurance and executive medical insurance coverage in the event of permanent
disability.

Mr. Stahl’s employment agreement provides that he is entitled to a loan from Products Corporation
to satisfy state, local and federal income taxes (including any withholding taxes) incurred by him as a
result of his making an election under Section 83(b) of the Code in connection with the 1,000,000 shares
of restricted stock which were granted to him by the Company on the 2002 Stahl Grant Date. Mr. Stahl
received such loan from Products Corporation in the amount of $1,800,000 in March 2002, prior to the
passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and its prohibition on loans to executive ofﬁcers. Interest on
such loan is payable at the applicable federal rate required to avoid imputation of income tax liability. The
full principal amount of such loan and all accrued interest is due and payable on February 17, 2007 (the
ﬁfth anniversary of the 2002 Stahl Grant Date), provided that if Mr. Stahl terminates his employment for
‘‘good reason’’ or the Company terminates him other than for ‘‘disability’’ or ‘‘cause’’ (as each such term

is deﬁned or described in Mr. Stahl’s employment agreement), the outstanding balance of such loan and
all accrued interest would be forgiven. Such loan is secured by a pledge of the 1,000,000 shares of
restricted stock which were granted to Mr. Stahl on the 2002 Stahl Grant Date and such loan and pledge
are evidenced by a Promissory Note and a Pledge Agreement, each dated March 13, 2002. Mr. Stahl’s
employment agreement also provides that he is entitled to a mortgage loan to cover the purchase of a
principal residence in the New York metropolitan area and/or a Manhattan apartment, in the principal
amount of $2,000,000, which loan was advanced by Products Corporation to Mr. Stahl on May 20, 2002,
prior to the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The principal of the mortgage loan is repayable
on a monthly basis during the period from June 1, 2002 through and including May 1, 2032, with interest
at the applicable federal rate, with the unpaid principal and accrued and unpaid interest due in full 90 days
after Mr. Stahl’s employment with the Company terminates, whichever occurs earlier. Pursuant to his
employment agreement, Mr. Stahl is entitled to receive additional compensation payable on a monthly
basis equal to the amount repaid by him in respect of interest and principal on the mortgage loan, plus
a gross up for any taxes resulting from such additional compensation. If during the term of his
employment agreement Mr. Stahl terminates his employment for ‘‘good reason,’’ or the Company
terminates his employment other than for ‘‘disability’’ or ‘‘cause’’ (as each such term is deﬁned or
described in Mr. Stahl’s employment agreement), the mortgage loan from the Company would be forgiven
in its entirety.

Mr. Stahl’s employment agreement was amended on December 17, 2004 to extend the term of his
agreement to February 16, 2008 and to provide for continued vesting of equity awards previously granted
to Mr. Stahl in the event that he is terminated by the Company without ‘‘cause’’ or if Mr. Stahl terminates
his employment for ‘‘good reason’’ (as each such term is deﬁned or described in Mr. Stahl’s employment
agreement). Speciﬁcally, in the event that Mr. Stahl was terminated without ‘‘cause’’ or if he terminated
his employment for ‘‘good reason,’’ the stock option awards granted to Mr. Stahl by the Company on
February 17, 2002, May 19, 2003 and April 14, 2004, and the restricted stock awards granted to Mr. Stahl
on February 17, 2002 and April 14, 2004, would continue to vest in accordance with their terms as if Mr.
Stahl’s employment had not been terminated and he had remained employed by the Company, and those
stock option awards shall remain exercisable until the later of (i) one year after such existing option award
becomes 100% fully vested and exercisable or (ii) 18 months following Mr. Stahl’s termination of
employment, but in no event beyond the original option term of each such award; provided, however, that
in the event of continued vesting of any option awards or restricted stock awards, as described above, the
non-solicitation and non-competition covenants in Mr. Stahl’s employment agreement shall remain in
effect at least until the date that all existing equity awards are fully vested.

Mr. McGuire’s employment agreement with Products Corporation, as amended (as so amended, his
‘‘employment agreement’’), provides that he will serve as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Ofﬁcer at a base salary of not less than $500,000 per annum and that he receive a (i) retention incentive
of $600,000 to be paid not later than December 31, 2004 (which payment was made on January 13, 2005)
intended to assist him in purchasing a home in the New York metropolitan area, and (ii) grant of (A)
50,000 shares of restricted stock in 2003 (which grant was made on the 2003 McGuire Grant Date), (B)
100,000 options in 2003 (which grant was made on the 2003 McGuire Grant Date), (C) 25,000 options in
2004 (which grant was made on April 14, 2004) and (D) 25,000 options in 2005. The term of Mr. McGuire’s
employment agreement ends on August 17, 2006. During any period that his employment continues after
August 17, 2006, Mr. McGuire would be deemed an employee at will and would be eligible for severance
under Products Corporation’s Executive Severance Policy (see ‘‘— Executive Severance Policy’’),
provided that the Severance Period for Mr. McGuire shall not be less than 24 months.

Mr. McGuire’s employment agreement provides for participation in the Executive Bonus Plan and
other executive beneﬁt plans on a basis equivalent to other senior executives of the Company generally.
The employment agreement for Mr. McGuire also provides for protection of Company conﬁdential
information and includes a non-compete obligation.

Mr. McGuire’s employment agreement provides that in the event of termination of the term by Mr.
McGuire for material breach by the Company of a material provision of such agreement or failure of the
Compensation Committee to adopt and implement the recommendations of management with respect to
stock option or restricted stock grants to be provided under his employment agreement, or by the
Company (otherwise than for ‘‘cause’’ as deﬁned in Mr. McGuire’s employment agreement or disability),

Mr. McGuire would be entitled, at his election, to severance pursuant to the Executive Severance Policy
(see ‘‘— Executive Severance Policy’’) (provided that the Severance Period for Mr. McGuire shall not be
less than 24 months) or continued payments of base salary through August 17, 2006 and continued
participation in the Company’s life insurance plan, which life insurance coverage is subject to a limit of
two years, and medical plans, subject to the terms of such plans through August 17, 2006 or until Mr.
McGuire were covered by like plans of another company.

Mr. McGuire’s original employment agreement provided that Mr. McGuire was eligible for certain
relocation and retention beneﬁts with the expectation that he would sell his home in Atlanta by August
18, 2004 and complete his relocation to New York by October 18, 2004. Due to the signiﬁcant time that
Mr. McGuire spent on the Company’s reﬁnancing activities during 2004, which did not permit Mr.
McGuire to pursue his relocation, the employment agreement was amended in December 2004 to allow
Mr. McGuire until August 18, 2005 to sell his home in Atlanta, until October 18, 2005 to complete his
relocation to the New York metropolitan area and to extend the period that Products Corporation’s would
provide him with reasonable corporate housing until December 31, 2004.

Mr. Greeff ceased employment with the Company during February 2005 pursuant to the terms of a
separation agreement between Products Corporation and Mr. Greeff, dated as of February 18, 2005 (the
‘‘Greeff Separation Agreement’’). Under the Greeff Separation Agreement, Mr. Greeff will receive
severance pay and beneﬁts substantially in accordance with the terms provided in his employment
agreement with Products Corporation, as amended (as so amended, his ‘‘employment agreement’’). Mr.
Greeff’s employment agreement had provided that he would serve as Executive Vice President – Strategic
Finance at a base salary of not less than $650,000 per annum and that he would receive a grant of (i) 50,000
shares of restricted stock in 2001 (which grant was made on June 18, 2001), (ii) 50,000 options in 2001
(which grant was made on March 26, 2001) and (iii) 50,000 options in 2002 (which grant was made on
February 15, 2002). Mr. Greeff’s employment agreement provided for participation in the Executive
Bonus Plan and other executive beneﬁt plans on a basis equivalent to other senior executives of the
Company generally and for Company-paid supplemental disability insurance. The employment agree-
ment for Mr. Greeff also provided for protection of Company conﬁdential information and included a
non-compete obligation.

Mr. Greeff’s employment agreement provided that in the event of termination of the term by Mr.
Greeff for breach by the Company of a material provision of such agreement or failure of the
Compensation Committee to adopt and implement the recommendations of management with respect to
stock option grants, or by the Company prior to December 31, 2006 (otherwise than for ‘‘cause’’ as deﬁned
in Mr. Greeff’s employment agreement or disability), Mr. Greeff would be entitled, at his election, to 24
months severance pay pursuant to the Executive Severance Policy (see ‘‘— Executive Severance Policy’’)
(other than the six-month limit on lump sum payments provided for in the Executive Severance Policy,
which six-month limit provision would not apply to Mr. Greeff) or continued payments of base salary
through December 31, 2006 and continued participation in the Company’s life insurance plan (which life
insurance coverage is subject to a limit of two years) and medical plans, subject to the terms of such plans
through December 31, 2006 or until Mr. Greeff were covered by like plans of another company, and
continued Company-paid supplemental disability insurance. In addition, Mr. Greeff’s employment
agreement provided that if he remained employed by Products Corporation or its afﬁliates until age 62,
then upon any subsequent retirement he would have been entitled to a supplemental pension beneﬁt in
a sufﬁcient amount so that his annual pension beneﬁt from all qualiﬁed and non-qualiﬁed pension plans
of Products Corporation and its afﬁliates, as well as any such plans of Mr. Greeff’s past employers or their
afﬁliates (expressed as a straight life annuity), equaled $400,000. His employment agreement also
provided that if Mr. Greeff’s employment were to terminate on or after December 31, 2003 and prior to
December 31, 2004, then he would have received 36.36% of the supplemental pension beneﬁt otherwise
payable pursuant to his employment agreement and thereafter an additional 9.09% would accrue as of
each December 31st on which Mr. Greeff was still employed (but in no event more than would have been
payable to Mr. Greeff under the foregoing provision had he retired at age 62). Mr. Greeff would not have
received any supplemental pension beneﬁt and would have been required to reimburse the Company for
any supplemental pension beneﬁts received if he were to breach the employment agreement or be
terminated by the Company for ‘‘cause’’ (as deﬁned in Mr. Greeff’s employment agreement). Mr. Greeff’s

employment agreement provided for continuation of group life insurance and executive medical
insurance coverage in the event of permanent disability.

Mr. Greeff’s employment agreement provided that he was entitled to the 2000 Loan from Products
Corporation, in the amount of $800,000 (which loan he received in 2000, prior to the passage of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and its prohibition on loans to executive ofﬁcers), with the principal to be
payable in ﬁve equal installments of $160,000, plus interest at the applicable federal rate, on each of May
9, 2001, May 9, 2002, May 9, 2003, May 9, 2004 (which installments were each repaid) and May 9, 2005,
provided that the total principal amount of such loan and any accrued but unpaid interest at the applicable
federal rate (the ‘‘Loan Payment’’) was due and payable upon the earlier of the January 15th immediately
following the termination of Mr. Greeff’s employment for any reason, or May 9, 2005. In addition, Mr.
Greeff’s employment agreement provided that he was entitled to a special bonus, payable on each May
9th (which special bonus was paid on May 9, 2001, May 9, 2002, May 9, 2003 and May 9, 2004) and ending
with May 9, 2005, equal to the sum of the Loan Payment with respect to such year, provided that he
remained employed on each such May 9th, and provided further that in the event that Mr. Greeff
terminated his employment for ‘‘good reason’’ or was terminated for a reason other than ‘‘cause’’ (as such
terms are deﬁned in Mr. Greeff’s employment agreement), he would be entitled to a special bonus in the
amount of $800,000 minus the sum of any special bonuses paid through the date of such termination plus
accrued but unpaid interest at the applicable federal rate. Pursuant to the Greeff Separation Agreement,
Mr. Greeff is scheduled to make the Loan Payment by May 9, 2005 and receive a special bonus in an
equivalent amount on such date. Notwithstanding the above, the employment agreement provided that
if Mr. Greeff was to terminate his employment other than for ‘‘good reason’’ or the Company were to
terminate his employment for ‘‘cause’’ (as such terms are deﬁned in Mr. Greeff’s employment agreement),
or if he breached certain post-employment covenants, any bonus described above would be forfeited or
repaid by Mr. Greeff, as the case may be. Mr. Greeff’s employment agreement also provided that he was
eligible to receive a payment of not less than $1.0 million, subject to approval by the Compensation
Committee, upon the completion of objectives relating to the Company’s long-term ﬁnancings, provided
that Mr. Greeff remained employed at such time. Pursuant to the terms of his separation agreement and
his employment agreement, in March 2005 Mr. Greeff will receive a payment of $1.0 million in respect of
2004 in recognition of the successful completion of the Revlon Exchange Transactions and the reﬁnancing
of Products Corporation’s 2001 Credit Agreement with the 2004 Credit Agreement during 2004.

The Greeff Separation Agreement provides that he will receive all of the compensation and beneﬁts
provided for in his employment agreement, including salary continuation payments through December
31, 2006, which, unless in its reasonably exercised discretion the Company decides otherwise, will be
reduced on account of any compensation earned by Mr. Greeff from employment or consulting services.
In addition, pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement and in accordance with the terms of the
Company’s Executive Bonus Plan, the Greeff Separation Agreement provides that Mr. Greeff is entitled
to a bonus in respect of 2004 under the Executive Bonus Plan, based upon the extent, if any, of
achievement of objective performance-based criteria established by the Compensation Committee during
2004. Such a bonus, in the amount of $133,500, will be paid to Mr. Greeff in March 2005. In accordance
with the terms of his employment agreement, Mr. Greeff will also be entitled to continue his existing
medical/dental beneﬁts, disability and life insurance until the end of the severance period or December
31, 2006 or, in the case of medical/dental beneﬁts, until such earlier date he becomes eligible for coverage
under like plans of another employer.

The Greeff Separation Agreement further provides, pursuant to the terms of Mr. Greeff’s
employment agreement, that each of Mr. Greeff’s existing stock option grants will continue to vest in
accordance with their respective terms and remain exercisable for one year following the later of the date
each such grant becomes fully vested and exercisable or the date Mr. Greeff ceased to be employed by
the Company. Pursuant to the Greeff Separation Agreement, Mr. Greeff received an award of options to
acquire 240,000 shares of Revlon, Inc.’s Class A Common Stock, which options have a term of 7 years and
vest in 25% increments per year, with the grant continuing to remain exercisable for one year following
the date such grant becomes fully vested, which grant was made upon the recommendation of the
Company and the approval of the Compensation Committee in February 2005. Also under the Greeff
Separation Agreement, the 60,000 shares of restricted stock awarded to Mr. Greeff on the 2002 Greeff

Grant Date, which were due to vest on September 17, 2005 had Mr. Greeff remained employed by the
Company, will continue to vest in accordance with their terms.

Executive Severance Policy

Products Corporation’s Executive Severance Policy provides that upon termination of employment
of eligible executive employees, including Messrs. Stahl, McGuire and Greeff, other than voluntary
resignation or termination by Products Corporation for good reason, in consideration for the executive’s
execution of a release and conﬁdentiality agreement and the Company’s standard employee non-
competition agreement, the eligible executive may be entitled to receive, in lieu of severance under any
employment agreement then in effect or under Products Corporation’s basic severance plan, a number of
months of severance pay in bi-weekly installments based upon such executive’s grade level and years of
service, reduced by the amount of any compensation from subsequent employment, unemployment
compensation or statutory termination payments received by such executive during the severance period
and, in certain circumstances, by the actuarial value of enhanced pension beneﬁts received by the
executive, as well as continued participation in medical and certain other beneﬁt plans for the severance
period (or in lieu thereof, upon commencement of subsequent employment, a lump sum payment equal
to the then present value of 50% of the amount of base salary then remaining payable through the balance
of the severance period, generally capped at six months pay and subject to any restrictions under the
Code). Pursuant to the Executive Severance Policy, upon meeting the conditions set forth in such policy,
as of December 31, 2004, Messrs. Stahl and McGuire could be entitled to severance pay of up to 21 and
19 months of base salary, respectively, at the base salary rate in effect on the date of employment
termination, plus continued participation in the medical and dental plans for the same respective periods
on the same terms as active employees, provided that under Mr. McGuire’s employment agreement the
severance period is at least 24 months and under Mr. Stahl’s agreement he is entitled to 36 months’
severance. The terms of Mr. Greeff’s severance arrangements are governed by the Greeff Separation
Agreement.

Deﬁned Beneﬁt Plans

In accordance with the terms of the Revlon Employees’ Retirement Plan (the ‘‘Retirement Plan’’),
the following table shows the estimated annual retirement beneﬁts payable (as of December 31, 2004)
under the non-cash balance program of the Retirement Plan (the ‘‘Non-Cash Balance Program’’) at
normal retirement age (65) to a person retiring with the indicated average compensation and years of
credited service, on a straight life annuity basis, after Social Security offset, including amounts attributable
to the Revlon Pension Equalization Plan, as amended (the ‘‘Pension Equalization Plan’’), as described
below.

Highest Consecutive
Five-Year Average
Compensation
During Final 10 Years ($)

600,000
700,000
800,000
900,000
1,000,000
1,100,000
1,200,000
1,300,000
1,400,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000

Estimated Annual Straight Life Annuity Beneﬁts At Retirement
With Indicated Years Of Credited Service ($) (a)

150,525
176,525
202,525
228,525
254,525
280,525
306,525
332,525
358,525
384,525
500,000
500,000

200,700
235,367
270,033
304,700
339,367
374,033
408,700
443,367
478,033
500,000
500,000
500,000

250,875
294,208
337,542
380,875
424,208
467,542
500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000

301,050
353,050
405,050
457,050
500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000

(a) The normal form of beneﬁt for the Retirement Plan and the Pension Equalization Plan is a straight life annuity.

The Retirement Plan is intended to be a tax qualiﬁed deﬁned beneﬁt plan. Non-Cash Balance
Program beneﬁts are a function of service and ﬁnal average compensation. The Non-Cash Balance
Program is designed to provide an employee having 30 years of credited service with an annuity generally
equal to 52% of ﬁnal average compensation, less 50% of estimated individual Social Security beneﬁts.
Final average compensation is deﬁned as average annual base salary and bonus (but not any part of
bonuses in excess of 50% of base salary) during the ﬁve consecutive calendar years in which base salary
and bonus (but not any part of bonuses in excess of 50% of base salary) were highest out of the last 10
years prior to retirement or earlier termination. Except as otherwise indicated, credited service includes
all periods of employment with the Company or a subsidiary prior to retirement or earlier termination.
Messrs. Stahl and McGuire do not participate in the Non-Cash Balance Program.

Effective January 1, 2001, Products Corporation amended the Retirement Plan to provide for a cash
balance program under the Retirement Plan (the ‘‘Cash Balance Program’’). Under the Cash Balance
Program, eligible employees will receive quarterly credits to an individual cash balance bookkeeping
account equal to 5% of their compensation for the previous quarter. Interest credits, which commenced
June 30, 2001, are allocated quarterly (based on the yield of the 30-year Treasury bond for November of
the preceding calendar year). Employees who as of January 1, 2001 were at least age 45, had 10 or more
years of service with the Company and whose age and years of service totaled at least 60 were
‘‘grandfathered’’ and continue to participate in the Non-Cash Balance Program under the same
retirement formula described in the preceding paragraph. All other eligible employees had their beneﬁts
earned (if any) under the Non-Cash Balance Program ‘‘frozen’’ on December 31, 2000 and began to
participate in the Cash Balance Program on January 1, 2001. The ‘‘frozen’’ beneﬁts will be payable at
normal retirement age and will be reduced if the employee elects early retirement. Any employee who,
as of January 1, 2001 was at least age 40 but not part of the ‘‘grandfathered’’ group will, in addition to the
‘‘basic’’ 5% quarterly pay credits, receive quarterly ‘‘transition’’ pay credits of 3% of compensation each
year for up to 10 years or until he/she leaves employment with the Company, whichever is earlier. Messrs.
Stahl and McGuire participate in the Cash Balance Program. As they were not employed by the Company
on January 1, 2001 (the date on which a ‘‘transition’’ employee was determined), Messrs. Stahl and
McGuire are eligible to receive only basic pay credits. The estimated annual beneﬁts payable under the
Cash Balance Program as a single life annuity (assuming Messrs. Stahl and McGuire remain employed by
the Company until age 65 at their current level of compensation) is $191,800 for Mr. Stahl and $70,600 for
Mr. McGuire. Mr. Stahl’s total retirement beneﬁts will be determined in accordance with his employment
agreement, which provides for a guaranteed retirement beneﬁt provided that certain conditions are met.

The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, places certain maximum
limitations upon the annual beneﬁt payable under all qualiﬁed plans of an employer to any one individual.
In addition, the Code limits the annual amount of compensation that can be considered in determining
the level of beneﬁts under qualiﬁed plans. The Pension Equalization Plan, as amended, is a non-qualiﬁed
beneﬁt arrangement designed to provide for the payment by the Company of the difference, if any,
between the amount of such maximum limitations and the annual beneﬁt that would be payable under the
Retirement Plan (including the Non-Cash Balance Program and the Cash Balance Program) but for such
limitations, up to a combined maximum annual straight life annuity beneﬁt at age 65 under the
Retirement Plan and the Pension Equalization Plan of $500,000. Beneﬁts provided under the Pension
Equalization Plan are conditioned on the participant’s compliance with his or her non-competition
agreement and on the participant not competing with Products Corporation for one year after termination
of employment.

The number of full years of service under the Retirement Plan and the Pension Equalization Plan as

of January 1, 2005 for Mr. Stahl was two years and for Mr. McGuire was one year.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneﬁcial Owners and Management and Related

Stockholder Matters

The following table sets forth, as of December 31, 2004, the number of shares of Revlon, Inc.’s
Common Stock beneﬁcially owned, and the percent so owned, by (i) each person known to the Company
to be the beneﬁcial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of Revlon, Inc.’s Common Stock,
(ii) each director of the Company, (iii) the Chief Executive Ofﬁcer during 2004 and each of the other
Named Executive Ofﬁcers during 2004 and (iv) all directors and Named Executive Ofﬁcers of the
Company as a group. The number of shares owned are those beneﬁcially owned, as determined under the
applicable rules of the SEC for the purposes of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and such information
is not necessarily indicative of beneﬁcial ownership for any other purpose. Under such rules, beneﬁcial
ownership includes any shares of Common Stock as to which a person has sole or shared voting power
or investment power and any shares of Common Stock which the person has the right to acquire within
60 days through the exercise of any option, warrant or right, through conversion of any security or
pursuant to the automatic termination of a power of attorney or revocation of a trust, discretionary
account or similar arrangement.

Name and Address
of Beneﬁcial Owner
Ronald O. Perelman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

35 E. 62nd St.
New York, NY 10021

Amount and Nature of
Beneﬁcial Ownership
191,246,058 (Class A)
31,250,000 (Class B)(1)

FMR Corp.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

61,410,699 (Class A)(2)

82 Devonshire Street
Boston MA 02109

Alan S. Bernikow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Paul J. Bohan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Donald G. Drapkin. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . —
Meyer Feldberg . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Howard Gittis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Douglas H. Greeff. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Edward J. Landau . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Thomas E. McGuire . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Linda Gosden Robinson . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Jack L. Stahl. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Kenneth L. Wolfe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
All Directors and Named Executive

7,390 (Class A)(3)
5,515 (Class A)(4)

22,390 (Class A)(5)
150,000 (Class A)
379,027 (Class A)(6)
22,524 (Class A)(7)
273,750 (Class A) (8)
22,390 (Class A)(9)
1,869,416 (Class A)(10)
20,515 (Class A) (11)

Ofﬁcers as a Group (12 Persons) . . . . .

194,018,975 (Class A)
31,250,000 (Class B)(12)

Percentage of
Class
59.93% (Class A and Class B
combined)
56.25% (Class A)
100.00% (Class B)
16.59% (Class A and Class B
combined)
18.12% (Class A)
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
60.36% (Class A and B
combined)
56.74% (Class A)
100.0% (Class B)

Less than one percent.

(1) Mr. Perelman beneﬁcially owns, directly and indirectly, through MacAndrews & Forbes, 191,246,058 shares of Revlon, Inc.’s
Class A Common Stock (including 32,599,374 shares of Class A Common Stock beneﬁcially owned by Raymond G. Perelman,
a family member, with respect to which shares MacAndrews & Forbes holds a voting proxy, 120,000 shares that represent
restricted shares which vested during 2004 and, as described below, 1,135,417 shares that may be acquired under vested
options). Mr. Perelman, through MacAndrews & Forbes, also beneﬁcially owns all of the outstanding 31,250,000 shares of the
Company’s Class B Common Stock, each of which is convertible into one share of Class A Common Stock, which, together
with the Class A Common Stock referenced above represent approximately 59.9% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s
Common Stock. Based on the shares referenced above, Mr. Perelman, at December 31, 2004, had approximately 77.2% of the
combined voting power of the outstanding shares of the Company’s Common Stock currently entitled to vote at the 2005
Annual Meeting. Shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock and shares of intermediate holding companies between the
Company and MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings are, and may from time to time be, pledged to secure obligations of
MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings or its afﬁliates. A default under these obligations could cause a foreclosure with respect to
such pledged shares. Mr. Perelman holds vested options to acquire 1,135,417 shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock,
comprised of an option to acquire 300,000 shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock, which option vested on February
12, 1999, an option to acquire 300,000 shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock, which option vested on April 4, 2002,
options to acquire 56,250 shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock, which options vested on June 18, 2002, an option
to acquire 300,000 shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock, which option vested on April 27, 2003, options to acquire
56,250 shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock which options vested on June 18, 2003, options to acquire 33,334 shares
of the Company’s Class A Common Stock, which options vested on September 17, 2003, options to acquire 56,250 shares of

the Company’s Class A Common Stock, which options vested on June 18, 2004 and options to acquire 33,333 shares of the
Company’s Class A Common Stock, which options vested on September 17, 2004.

(2)

Information based solely on a Schedule 13G/A, dated and ﬁled with the SEC on November 10, 2004 and reporting, as of
October 31, 2004, beneﬁcial ownership by FMR Corp., Edward C. Johnson 3d and Abigail P. Johnson of 61,410,699 shares of
Class A Common Stock as of October 31, 2004 (collectively, the ‘‘Fidelity Owned Shares’’). According to the Schedule 13G/A,
Fidelity, a wholly-owned subsidiary of FMR Corp. and an investment adviser registered under Section 203 of the Investment
Advisers Act of 1940, was the beneﬁcial owner of 42,962,408 shares (which are included in the Fidelity Owned Shares) as a
result of acting as investment adviser to various investment companies registered under Section 8 of the Investment Company
Act of 1940. The ownership of one investment company, Fidelity Advisors High Yield Fund, amounted to 36,977,584 shares
(which are included in the Fidelity Owned Shares). Edward C. Johnson 3d, FMR Corp., through its control of Fidelity, and the
funds each has sole power to dispose of the 42,962,408 shares then owned by the funds. Neither FMR Corp. nor Edward C.
Johnson 3d, Chairman of FMR Corp., has the sole power to vote or direct the voting of the shares owned directly by the
Fidelity funds, which power resides with the funds’ Boards of Trustees. Fidelity carries out the voting of the shares under
written guidelines established by the funds’ Boards of Trustees. Fidelity Management Trust Company, a wholly-owned
subsidiary of FMR Corp. and a bank as deﬁned in Section 3(a)(6) of the Exchange Act, was the beneﬁcial owner of 18,448,291
shares (which are included in the Fidelity Owned Shares) as a result of its serving as investment manager of the institutional
account(s). Edward C. Johnson 3d and FMR Corp., through its control of Fidelity Management Trust Company, each has sole
dispositive power over 18,448,291 shares and sole power to vote or to direct the voting of 14,546,038 shares (which are included
in the Fidelity Owned Shares), and no power to vote or to direct the voting of 3,902,253 shares of Class A Common Stock
owned by the institutional account(s) as reported above. Members of the Edward C. Johnson 3d family are the predominant
owners of Class B shares of common stock of FMR Corp., representing approximately 49% of the voting power of FMR Corp.
Edward C. Johnson 3d owns 12.0% and Abigail P. Johnson owns 24.5% of the aggregate outstanding voting stock of FMR Corp.
Edward C. Johnson 3d is Chairman of FMR Corp. and Abigail P. Johnson is a Director of FMR Corp. As a result of facts
described in the Schedule 13G/A, members of the Johnson family may be deemed, under the Investment Company Act of 1940,
to form a controlling group with respect to FMR Corp. Fidelity, Fidelity Advisors High Yield Fund and Fidelity Management
Trust Company share the same principal business address as FMR Corp.

(3)

Includes 1,875 shares that Mr. Bernikow may acquire under options that vested on October 29, 2004 and 5,515 shares that Mr.
Bernikow may acquire under options that vested on December 31, 2004.

(4)

Includes 5,515 shares that Mr. Bohan may acquire under options that vested on December 31, 2004.

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

(9)

Includes 16,875 shares which Mr. Feldberg may acquire under options which vested in installments of 1,875 shares on each of
May 22, 2001, May 22, 2002, July 13, 2002, May 22, 2003, July 13, 2003, December 17, 2003, May 22, 2004, July 13, 2004 and
December 17, 2004 and 5,515 shares that Mr. Feldberg may acquire under options that vested on December 31, 2004.

Includes 187,360 shares held directly by Mr. Greeff (including 50,000 shares that represent restricted shares which vested
during 2004), 25,000 shares which Mr. Greeff may acquire under options which vested on May 22, 2001, 12,500 shares which
Mr. Greeff may acquire under options which vested on March 26, 2002, 25,000 shares which Mr. Greeff may acquire under
options which vested on May 22, 2002, 12,500 shares which Mr. Greeff may acquire under options which vested on February
15, 2003, 12,500 shares which Mr. Greeff may acquire under options which vested on March 26, 2003, 25,000 shares which Mr.
Greeff may acquire under options which vested on May 22, 2003, 8,334 shares which Mr. Greeff may acquire under options
which vested on September 17, 2003, 12,500 shares which Mr. Greeff may acquire under options which vested on February 15,
2004, 12,500 shares which Mr. Greeff may acquire under options which vested on March 26, 2004, 25,000 shares which Mr.
Greeff may acquire under options which vested on May 22, 2004, 8,333 shares which Mr. Greeff may acquire under options
that vested on September 17, 2004 and 12,500 shares which Mr. Greeff may acquire under options that vested on February 15,
2005. Mr. Greeff ceased employment with the Company in February 2005.

Includes 134 shares held directly by Mr. Landau, 16,875 shares which Mr. Landau may acquire under options which vested in
installments of 1,875 shares on each of May 22, 2001, May 22, 2002, July 13, 2002, May 22, 2003, July 13, 2003, December 17,
2003, May 22, 2004, July 13, 2004, December 17, 2004 and 5,515 shares which Mr. Landau may acquire under options which
vested on December 31, 2004.

Includes 25,000 shares that Mr. McGuire may acquire under options that vested on August 18, 2004 and 248,750 shares that
Mr. McGuire may acquire under options that vested on December 31, 2004.

Includes 16,875 shares which Ms. Robinson may acquire under options which vested in installments of 1,875 shares on each of
May 22, 2001, May 22, 2002, July 13, 2002, May 22, 2003, July 13, 2003, December 17, 2003, May 22, 2004, July 13, 2004,
December 17, 2004 and 5,515 shares which Ms. Robinson may acquire under options that vested on December 31, 2004.

(10) Includes 451,015 shares held directly by Mr. Stahl (including 250,000 shares that represent restricted shares which vested during
2004), 13,401 shares held by his wife, as to which beneﬁcial ownership is disclaimed, 25,000 shares that Mr. Stahl may acquire
under options that vested on May 19, 2004 and 1,380,000 shares that Mr. Stahl may acquire under options that vested on
December 31, 2004.

(11) Includes 15,000 shares held directly by Mr. Wolfe and 5,515 shares that Mr. Wolfe may acquire under options that vested on

December 31, 2004.

(12) Includes shares beneﬁcially owned as of December 31, 2004 by Messrs. Perelman, Bernikow, Bohan, Drapkin, Feldberg, Gittis,
Landau and Wolfe, and Ms. Gosden Robinson (who were directors as of December 31, 2004) and the Named Executive
Ofﬁcers as of such date (including Messrs. Stahl and McGuire and Mr. Greeff, the latter who ceased employment with the
Company in February 2005).

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

The following table sets forth as of December 31, 2004, with respect to all compensation plans of the
Company previously approved and not previously approved by its stockholders (i) the number of
securities to be issued upon the exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights and the vesting of
restricted stock, (ii) the weighted-average exercise price of such outstanding options, warrants and rights
(which excludes restricted stock) and (iii) the number of securities remaining available for future issuance
under such equity compensation plans, excluding securities reﬂected in item (i). A description of the
Supplemental Stock Plan follows the table.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

(a)
Number of
securities to be
issued upon
exercise of
outstanding
options, warrants
and rights

(b)
Weighted-
average exercise
price of
outstanding
options, warrants
and rights

(c)
Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation
plans (excluding
securities reﬂected in
column (a))

36,109,186(1)

$ 4.66(4)

3,822,698

Plan Category

Previously Approved by Stockholders:
Stock Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Not Previously Approved by

Stockholders:(2)

2002 Supplemental Stock Plan . . . . . . .

397,500(3)

N/A(3)(4)

—

(1)

Includes 5,327,500 shares of restricted stock and 30,781,686 options issued under the Stock Plan.

(2) The Supplemental Stock Plan was not required to be approved by the Company’s stockholders.

(3)

Includes 530,000 shares of restricted stock issued under the Supplemental Stock Plan, the entire amount of securities issuable
under such plan, less 132,500 of such shares as to which the restrictions lapsed on June 18, 2004.

(4) Weighted-average exercise price excludes restricted stock.

On February 17, 2002, the Company adopted the Supplemental Stock Plan, the purpose of which was
to provide Mr. Stahl, the sole eligible participant, with inducement awards to induce him to join the
Company and to enhance the Company’s long-term performance and proﬁtability. The Supplemental
Stock Plan covers 530,000 shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock. Awards may be made under
the Supplemental Stock Plan in the form of stock options, stock appreciation rights and restricted or
unrestricted stock. On February 17, 2002, the Compensation Committee granted Mr. Stahl an Award of
530,000 restricted shares of Class A Common Stock, the full amount of the shares of Class A Common
Stock issuable under the Supplemental Stock Plan. The terms of the Supplemental Stock Plan and the
foregoing grant of restricted shares to Mr. Stahl are substantially the same as the Stock Plan and the grant
of restricted shares to Mr. Stahl under the Stock Plan. Pursuant to the terms of the Supplemental Stock
Plan, such grant was made conditioned upon Mr. Stahl’s execution of the Company’s standard employee
conﬁdentiality and non-competition agreement. See ‘‘— Employment Agreements and Termination of
Employment Agreements’’ for information regarding vesting and forfeiture.

In addition to the shares of Common Stock beneﬁcially owned by Mr. Perelman as described under
Item 12, ‘‘Security Ownership of Certain Beneﬁcial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder
Matters’’, Mr. Perelman was awarded 50,000 restricted shares of Class A Common Stock as to which the
restrictions are expected to lapse no later than September 17, 2005 and options to acquire 300,000 shares
of Class A Common Stock that vest on March 30, 2005, 56,250 shares of Class A Common Stock that vest
on June 18, 2005 and 33,333 shares of Class A Common Stock that vest on September 17, 2005.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

As of December 31, 2004, MacAndrews & Forbes beneﬁcially owned shares of Revlon, Inc.’s
Common Stock having approximately 77.2% of the voting power of the outstanding shares of Revlon,
Inc.’s Common Stock. As a result, MacAndrews & Forbes is able to elect Revlon, Inc.’s entire Board of

Directors and control the vote on all matters submitted to a vote of Revlon, Inc.’s stockholders.
MacAndrews & Forbes is wholly owned by Ronald O. Perelman, Chairman of Revlon, Inc.’s Board of
Directors.

Transfer Agreements

In June 1992, Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation entered into an asset transfer agreement with
Revlon Holdings LLC a Delaware limited liability company and formerly a Delaware corporation known
as Revlon Holdings Inc. (‘‘Revlon Holdings’’) and which is an afﬁliate and an indirect wholly-owned
subsidiary of MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings) and certain of its wholly-owned subsidiaries, and Revlon,
Inc. and Products Corporation entered into a real property asset transfer agreement with Revlon
Holdings, and pursuant to such agreements, on June 24, 1992 Revlon Holdings transferred assets to
Products Corporation and Products Corporation assumed all of the liabilities of Revlon Holdings, other
than certain speciﬁcally excluded assets and liabilities (the liabilities excluded are referred to as the
‘‘Excluded Liabilities’’). Certain consumer products lines sold in demonstrator-assisted distribution
channels considered not integral to Revlon, Inc.’s business, and that historically had not been proﬁtable,
and certain other assets and liabilities were retained by Revlon Holdings. Revlon Holdings agreed to
indemnify Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation against losses arising from the Excluded Liabilities, and
Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation agreed to indemnify Revlon Holdings against losses arising from
the liabilities assumed by Products Corporation. The amount reimbursed by Revlon Holdings to Products
Corporation for the Excluded Liabilities for 2004 was $0.2 million.

Reimbursement Agreements

Revlon, Inc., Products Corporation and MacAndrews & Forbes Inc. have entered into reimburse-
ment agreements (the ‘‘Reimbursement Agreements’’) pursuant to which (i) MacAndrews & Forbes Inc.
is obligated to provide (directly or through afﬁliates) certain professional and administrative services,
including employees, to Revlon, Inc. and its subsidiaries, including Products Corporation, and purchase
services from third party providers, such as insurance, legal and accounting services and air transportation
services, on behalf of Revlon, Inc. and its subsidiaries, including Products Corporation, to the extent
requested by Products Corporation, and (ii) Products Corporation is obligated to provide certain
professional and administrative services, including employees, to MacAndrews & Forbes Inc. (and its
afﬁliates) and purchase services from third party providers, such as insurance and legal and accounting
services, on behalf of MacAndrews & Forbes Inc. (and its afﬁliates) to the extent requested by
MacAndrews & Forbes Inc., provided that in each case the performance of such services does not cause
an unreasonable burden to MacAndrews & Forbes Inc. or Products Corporation, as the case may be.
Products Corporation reimburses MacAndrews & Forbes Inc. for the allocable costs of the services
purchased for or provided to Products Corporation and its subsidiaries and for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred in connection with the provision of such services. MacAndrews & Forbes Inc. (or such
afﬁliates) reimburses Products Corporation for the allocable costs of the services purchased for or
provided to MacAndrews & Forbes Inc. (or such afﬁliates) and for the reasonable out-of-pocket expenses
incurred in connection with the purchase or provision of such services. Each of Revlon, Inc. and Products
Corporation, on the one hand, and MacAndrews & Forbes Inc., on the other, has agreed to indemnify the
other party for losses arising out of the provision of services by it under the Reimbursement Agreements
other than losses resulting from its willful misconduct or gross negligence. The Reimbursement
Agreements may be terminated by either party on 90 days’ notice. Products Corporation does not intend
to request services under the Reimbursement Agreements unless their costs would be at least as favorable
to Products Corporation as could be obtained from unafﬁliated third parties. Revlon, Inc. and Products
Corporation participate in MacAndrews & Forbes’ directors and ofﬁcers liability insurance program,
which covers Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation, as well as MacAndrews & Forbes. The limits of
coverage are available on an aggregate basis for losses to any or all of the participating companies and
their respective directors and ofﬁcers. Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation reimburse MacAndrews &
Forbes for their allocable portion of the premiums for such coverage, which the Company believes is more
favorable than the premiums the Company would pay were it to secure stand-alone coverage. The
amounts paid by Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation to MacAndrews & Forbes for premiums is

included in the amounts paid under the Reimbursement Agreements. The net amount payable to
MacAndrews & Forbes Inc. by Products Corporation for the services provided under the Reimbursement
Agreements for 2004 was $1.0 million.

Tax Sharing Agreements

As a result of the closing of the Revlon Exchange Transactions (see ‘‘— Debt Reduction Transactions
and Related Agreements — Debt Reduction Transactions’’), as of the end of March 25, 2004, Revlon,
Inc., Products Corporation and their U.S. subsidiaries were no longer included in the MacAndrews &
Forbes Group for federal income tax purposes. The MacAndrews & Forbes Tax Sharing Agreement will
remain in effect solely for taxable periods beginning on or after January 1, 1992, through and including
March 25, 2004. In these taxable periods, Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation were included in the
MacAndrews & Forbes Group, and Revlon, Inc.’s and Products Corporation’s federal taxable income and
loss were included in such group’s consolidated tax return ﬁled by MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings.
Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation were also included in certain state and local tax returns of
MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings or its subsidiaries. In June 1992, Revlon Holdings, Revlon, Inc.,
Products Corporation and certain of its subsidiaries, and MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings entered into
a tax sharing agreement (as subsequently amended and restated, the ‘‘MacAndrews & Forbes Tax Sharing
Agreement’’), pursuant to which MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings agreed to indemnify Revlon, Inc. and
Products Corporation against federal, state or local income tax liabilities of the MacAndrews & Forbes
Group (other than in respect of Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation) for taxable periods beginning on
or after January 1, 1992 during which Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation or a subsidiary of Products
Corporation was a member of such group. Pursuant to the MacAndrews & Forbes Tax Sharing
Agreement, for all such taxable periods, Products Corporation was required to pay to Revlon, Inc., which
in turn was required to pay to Revlon Holdings, amounts equal to the taxes that Products Corporation
would otherwise have had to pay if it were to ﬁle separate federal, state or local income tax returns
(including any amounts determined to be due as a result of a redetermination arising from an audit or
otherwise of the consolidated or combined tax liability relating to any such period which was attributable
to Products Corporation), except that Products Corporation was not entitled to carry back any losses to
taxable periods ending prior to January 1, 1992. No payments were required by Products Corporation or
Revlon, Inc. if and to the extent Products Corporation was prohibited under the terms of its 2004 Credit
Agreement from making tax sharing payments to Revlon, Inc. The 2004 Credit Agreement prohibits
Products Corporation from making such tax sharing payments under the MacAndrews & Forbes Tax
Sharing Agreement other than in respect of state and local income taxes. The MacAndrews & Forbes Tax
Sharing Agreement was amended, effective as of January 1, 2001, to eliminate a contingent payment to
Revlon, Inc. under certain circumstances in return for a $10 million note with interest at 12% and interest
and principal payable by MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings on December 31, 2005. As a result of tax net
operating losses and prohibitions under the 2004 Credit Agreement, there were no federal tax payments
or payments in lieu of taxes pursuant to the MacAndrews & Forbes Tax Sharing Agreement in respect of
2004.

Registration Rights Agreement

Prior to the consummation of Revlon, Inc.’s initial public equity offering in February 1996, Revlon,
Inc. and Revlon Worldwide Corporation (subsequently merged into REV Holdings), the then direct
parent of Revlon, Inc., entered into a registration rights agreement (the ‘‘Registration Rights Agree-
ment’’), and in February 2003, MacAndrews & Forbes Inc. executed a joinder agreement to the
Registration Rights Agreement, pursuant to which REV Holdings, MacAndrews & Forbes Inc. and
certain transferees of Revlon, Inc.’s Common Stock held by REV Holdings (the ‘‘Holders’’) had the right
to require Revlon, Inc. to register all or part of Revlon, Inc.’s Class A Common Stock owned by such
Holders, including shares of Class A Common Stock purchased in connection with the $50.0 million
equity rights offering consummated by Revlon, Inc. in 2003, and shares of Class A Common Stock
issuable upon conversion of Revlon, Inc.’s Class B Common Stock owned by such Holders under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (a ‘‘Demand Registration’’); provided that Revlon, Inc. may postpone
giving effect to a Demand Registration for a period of up to 30 days if Revlon, Inc. believes such
registration might have a material adverse effect on any plan or proposal by Revlon, Inc. with respect to
any ﬁnancing, acquisition, recapitalization, reorganization or other material transaction, or if Revlon, Inc.
is in possession of material non-public information that, if publicly disclosed, could result in a material
disruption of a major corporate development or transaction then pending or in progress or in other
material adverse consequences to Revlon, Inc. In addition, the Holders have the right to participate in
registrations by Revlon, Inc. of its Class A Common Stock (a ‘‘Piggyback Registration’’). The Holders will
pay all out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with any Demand Registration. Revlon, Inc. will
pay any expenses incurred in connection with a Piggyback Registration, except for underwriting
discounts, commissions and expenses attributable to the shares of Revlon, Inc.’s Class A Common Stock
sold by such Holders. In connection with the closing of the Revlon Exchange Transactions and pursuant
to the 2004 Investment Agreement, MacAndrews & Forbes Inc. executed a joinder agreement that
provided that MacAndrews & Forbes Inc. would also be a Holder under the Registration Rights
Agreement and that all shares acquired by MacAndrews & Forbes Inc. pursuant to the Debt Reduction
Transactions or the Investment Agreement are deemed to be registrable securities under the Registration
Rights Agreement.

2003 and 2004 MacAndrews & Forbes Loans

In February 2003, MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings made available the MacAndrews & Forbes $100
million term loan to Products Corporation. In connection with the Revlon Exchange Transactions,
MacAndrews & Forbes exchanged approximately $109.7 million of principal and accrued and capitalized
interest outstanding under such loan (constituting all amounts outstanding thereunder) for 43,860,730
shares of Class A Common Stock, upon which the loan was fully retired. (see ‘‘— Debt Reduction
Transactions and Related Agreements — Certain Agreements Relating to the Debt Reduction Transac-
tions — MacAndrews Support Agreement’’).

MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings also provided Products Corporation in February 2003 with the
MacAndrews & Forbes $65 million line of credit. As of the closing date of the Revlon Exchange
Transactions, nil was outstanding under the MacAndrews & Forbes $65 million line of credit. (see
‘‘— Debt Reduction Transactions and Related Agreements — Certain Agreements Relating to the Debt
Reduction Transactions — MacAndrews Support Agreement’’). As described below, the MacAndrews &
Forbes $65 million line of credit and the remaining availability under the 2004 MacAndrews & Forbes
$125 million term loan (described below) were consolidated into the single 2004 Consolidated MacAn-
drews & Forbes Line of Credit effective as of August 10, 2004.

In December 2003, Revlon, Inc.’s Board of Directors approved two loans to Products Corporation
from MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, the 2004 MacAndrews & Forbes Loan, to provide up to $100
million if needed, to enable the Company to continue to implement and reﬁne its strategic plan, and the
$25 million MacAndrews & Forbes Loan to provide an additional $25 million to be used for general
corporate purposes. The 2004 MacAndrews & Forbes Loan and $25 million MacAndrews & Forbes Loan
were consolidated into the 2004 MacAndrews & Forbes $125 million term loan. In connection with the
Revlon Exchange Transactions, MacAndrews & Forbes exchanged approximately $38.9 million of
principal and capitalized interest outstanding under the 2004 MacAndrews & Forbes $125 million term

loan (constituting all amounts outstanding thereunder as of such date) for 15,579,882 shares of Class A
Common Stock (see ‘‘— Debt Reduction Transactions and Related Agreements — Certain Agreements
Relating to the Debt Reduction Transactions — MacAndrews Support Agreement’’). As described below,
the MacAndrews & Forbes $65 million line of credit and the remaining availability under the 2004
MacAndrews & Forbes $125 million term loan were consolidated into the single 2004 Consolidated
MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit effective as of August 10, 2004.

On July 9, 2004, Products Corporation and MacAndrews & Forbes Inc. entered into an agreement,
which effective as of August 10, 2004 amended, restated and consolidated the facilities for the
MacAndrews & Forbes $65 million line of credit and the 2004 MacAndrews & Forbes $125 million term
loan (the latter as to which, after the Revlon Exchange Transactions, the total term loan availability was
$87 million) into the single 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit with availability of
$152 million. The commitment under the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit
reduces to $87 million as of July 1, 2005 and terminates on December 1, 2005. Loans are available under
the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit if (i) the Multi-Currency Facility under
Products Corporation’s 2004 Credit Agreement has been substantially drawn (after taking into account
anticipated needs for Local Loans (as deﬁned in the 2004 Credit Agreement) and letters of credit), (ii)
such borrowing is necessary to cause the excess borrowing base under the Multi-Currency Facility of the
2004 Credit Agreement to remain greater than $30 million, (iii) additional revolving loans are not
available under the Multi-Currency Facility or (iv) such borrowing is reasonably necessary to prevent or
to cure a default or event of default under the 2004 Credit Agreement. Loans under the 2004
Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit bear interest (which is not payable in cash but is
capitalized quarterly in arrears) at a rate per annum equal to the lesser of (a) 12.0% and (b) 0.25% less
than the rate payable from time to time on Eurodollar loans under the Term Loan Facility under the 2004
Credit Agreement, which on December 31, 2004 was 8.0%, provided, that at any time that the Eurodollar
Base Rate under the 2004 Credit Agreement is equal to or greater than 3.0%, the applicable rate to loans
under the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit will be equal to the lesser of (x) 12.0%
and (y) 5.25% over the Eurodollar Base Rate then in effect. In connection with the 2004 Consolidated
MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit, on July 15, 2004, Revlon, Inc., Fidelity and MacAndrews & Forbes
agreed to eliminate the Borrowing Limitation.

Debt Reduction Transactions and Related Agreements

Debt Reduction Transactions

On February 11, 2004, Revlon, Inc.’s Board of Directors approved, and on March 25, 2004 Revlon,
Inc. consummated the Revlon Exchange Transactions, which were a series of transactions to reduce debt
and strengthen the Company’s balance sheet and capital structure, comprised of the Revlon Exchange
Offers, Loan Conversion Transactions and Preferred Stock Transactions (each as deﬁned below).
Substantially all of the terms of the Revlon Exchange Transactions, including the exchange rates for the
Revlon Exchange Offers, the Loan Conversion Transactions and the exchange of Revlon, Inc.’s Series A
preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share (the ‘‘Revlon Series A Preferred Stock’’), in the Preferred Stock
Transactions, were privately negotiated and agreed to with Fidelity. Such negotiations also encompassed
the terms of MacAndrews & Forbes’ participation and back-stop obligations (as described below). The
Revlon Exchange Transactions included:

•

The Revlon Exchange Offers—Offers to exchange (the ‘‘Revlon Exchange Offers’’), for
Products Corporation’s outstanding 81⁄8% Senior Notes and 9% Senior Notes, shares of Class A
Common Stock at an exchange ratio of 400 shares of Class A Common Stock or, at the option
of the tendering holder, cash (subject to certain limitations and proration) in an amount equal
to $830 with respect to the 81⁄8% Senior Notes and $800 with respect to the 9% Senior Notes, for
each $1,000 principal amount of 81⁄8% Senior Notes and 9% Senior Notes tendered for exchange;
and, for Products Corporation’s outstanding 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes (together with the
81⁄8% Senior Notes and the 9% Senior Notes, the ‘‘Exchange Notes’’), shares of Class A
Common Stock at an exchange ratio of 300 shares of Class A Common Stock or, at the option
of the tendering holder, cash (subject to certain limitations and proration) in an amount equal
to $620, for each $1,000 principal amount of 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes tendered for

•

exchange (in each case, with any accrued and unpaid interest on the Exchange Notes
exchangeable for, at the option of the holder thereof, cash or shares of Class A Common Stock
at an exchange ratio of 400 shares of Class A Common Stock for each $1,000 of accrued
interest).

The Loan Conversion Transactions—The exchange of Class A Common Stock for outstanding
amounts (including principal and interest) owing to MacAndrews & Forbes, as of the closing
date of the Revlon Exchange Transactions, under the MacAndrews & Forbes $100 million term
loan, the MacAndrews & Forbes $65 million line of credit, the 2004 MacAndrews & Forbes $125
million term loan and approximately $24 million of certain subordinated promissory notes
payable to Revlon Holdings (the ‘‘MacAndrews Advance’’ and, collectively with the MacAn-
drews & Forbes $100 million term loan, the MacAndrews & Forbes $65 million line of credit and
the 2004 MacAndrews & Forbes $125 million term loan, the ‘‘Conversion Loans’’) at an
exchange ratio of 400 shares of Class A Common Stock for each $1,000 of indebtedness
outstanding under the MacAndrews & Forbes $100 million term loan, MacAndrews & Forbes
$65 million line of credit and 2004 MacAndrews & Forbes $125 million term loan and 300 shares
of Class A Common Stock for each $1,000 of indebtedness outstanding under the MacAndrews
Advance (the ‘‘Loan Conversion Transactions’’).

The Preferred Stock Transactions—The exchange of Class A Common Stock for all 546 shares
of Revlon, Inc.’s outstanding Series A Preferred Stock (having an aggregate liquidation
preference of approximately $54.6 million) at an exchange ratio of 160 shares of Class A
Common Stock for each $1,000 of liquidation preference outstanding and the conversion of all
4,333 shares of Revlon, Inc.’s outstanding Series B convertible preferred stock, par value $0.01
per share, (‘‘Series B Preferred Stock’’) into 433,333 shares of Class A Common Stock in
accordance with its terms (the ‘‘Preferred Stock Transactions’’).

The Revlon Exchange Transactions closed on March 25, 2004 as follows:

•

An aggregate of approximately $631.2 million aggregate principal amount of Exchange Notes,
comprising approximately $133.8 million, $174.5 million and $322.9 million aggregate principal
amount of 81⁄8% Senior Notes, 9% Senior Notes and 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes,
respectively, were tendered in the Revlon Exchange Offers for an aggregate of 224,133,372
shares of Class A Common Stock.

• MacAndrews & Forbes (and in the case of (i) below, other entities related to it) exchanged, (i)
in the Revlon Exchange Offers an aggregate of approximately $287.7 million aggregate principal
amount (together with accrued and unpaid interest thereon) of Products Corporation’s
Exchange Notes (as part of the total of approximately $631.2 million aggregate principal amount
of Exchange Notes exchanged in the Revlon Exchange Offers), comprising approximately $1.0
million and $286.7 million aggregate principal amount of Products Corporation’s 9% Senior
Notes and 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes, respectively, in exchange for an aggregate of
87,914,170 shares of Class A Common Stock (including shares issued in respect of accrued
interest on such notes); (ii) in the Loan Conversion Transactions an aggregate of approximately
$172.7 million (including principal and accrued interest) outstanding under the Conversion
Loans in exchange for an aggregate of 66,666,788 shares of Class A Common Stock, comprising
approximately $109.7 million outstanding under the MacAndrews & Forbes $100 million term
loan in exchange for 43,860,730 shares of Class A Common Stock, $38.9 million outstanding
under the 2004 MacAndrews & Forbes $125 million term loan in exchange for 15,579,882 shares
of Class A Common Stock, and $24.1 million outstanding under the MacAndrews Advance in
exchange for 7,226,176 shares of Class A Common Stock; and (iii) in the Preferred Stock
Transactions all 546 shares of outstanding Series A Preferred Stock for 8,736,000 shares of Class
A Common Stock and converted all 4,333 shares of Series B Preferred Stock into 433,333 shares
of Class A Common Stock. Revlon, Inc. issued an aggregate of 163,750,291 shares of Class A
Common Stock to MacAndrews & Forbes and other entities related to it in the Revlon
Exchange Transactions. As of December 31, 2004, MacAndrews & Forbes beneﬁcially owned
191,246,058 shares of Class A Common Stock and 31,250,000 shares of Class B Common Stock,

•

or approximately 59.9% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock (see Part III, Item 12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneﬁcial Owners, Management and Related Stockholder
Matters).

Accounts and funds managed by Fidelity exchanged in the Revlon Exchange Offers approxi-
mately $195.7 million aggregate principal amount (together with accrued and unpaid interest
thereon) of Exchange Notes (as part of the total of approximately $631.2 million aggregate
principal amount of Exchange Notes exchanged in the Revlon Exchange Offers), in exchange
for 76,873,304 shares of Class A Common Stock. Included in the $195.7 million aggregate
principal amount of Exchange Notes were the Fidelity Initial Notes (as hereinafter deﬁned)
(having an aggregate principal amount of approximately $155.1 million) tendered pursuant to
the Fidelity Support Agreement and an additional $40.6 million aggregate principal amount of
Exchange Notes, comprising, in the aggregate, approximately $77.8 million, $85.9 million and
$32.1 million aggregate principal amount of 81⁄8% Senior Notes, 9% Senior Notes and 85⁄8%
Senior Subordinated Notes, respectively. As of December 31, 2004, funds and accounts managed
by FMR Corp. (of which Fidelity is a wholly-owned subsidiary) beneﬁcially held approximately
61.4 million shares of Class A Common Stock (representing approximately 16.6% of the
outstanding shares of Common Stock and approximately 9.4% of the combined voting power of
the Common Stock as of such date).

Certain Agreements Relating to the Debt Reduction Transactions

Guaranty of the Exchange Notes

In connection with the Revlon Exchange Transactions, Revlon, Inc. entered into supplemental
indentures pursuant to which it agreed to guarantee the obligations of Products Corporation under the
indentures governing the Exchange Notes. The guarantee is subordinated in right of payment to Revlon,
Inc.’s guarantee of Products Corporation’s obligations under the 2004 Credit Agreement.

Fidelity Support Agreement

In connection with the Debt Reduction Transactions, Revlon, Inc. entered into an agreement with
Fidelity (as amended, the ‘‘Fidelity Support Agreement’’) pursuant to which Fidelity agreed to, among
other things:

•

tender or cause to be tendered in the Revlon Exchange Offers, subject to the terms and
conditions thereof, approximately $75.6 million aggregate principal amount of Products
Corporation’s outstanding 81⁄8% Senior Notes, $47.4 million aggregate principal amount of
Products Corporation’s outstanding 9% Senior Notes and $32.1 million aggregate principal
amount of Products Corporation’s outstanding 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes (collectively,
the ‘‘Fidelity Initial Notes’’), which notes were held by accounts and funds managed by Fidelity
as of the date of the Fidelity Support Agreement, in exchange for shares of Class A Common
Stock; and

elect to receive either cash or shares of Class A Common Stock in exchange for accrued and
unpaid interest (at the applicable rate) on any Exchange Notes tendered by it in the Revlon
Exchange Offers.

Pursuant to the Fidelity Support Agreement, Revlon, Inc. agreed with Fidelity, among other things,
not to permit Products Corporation to have outstanding aggregate borrowings, at any time following the
close of the Revlon Exchange Offers and until the termination of the Stockholders Agreement (as
described below), under the MacAndrews & Forbes $65 million line of credit and the 2004 MacAndrews
& Forbes $125 million term loan in excess of approximately $86.7 million (the ‘‘Borrowing Limitation’’).
The Borrowing Limitation was eliminated in July 2004, as described below.

Pursuant to the Fidelity Support Agreement, as a condition to the exchange of Exchange Notes in the
Revlon Exchange Offers and effective upon the March 25, 2004 closing of the Revlon Exchange Offers,
two directors nominated by Fidelity (Messrs. Paul J. Bohan and Kenneth L. Wolfe) were appointed to
Revlon, Inc.’s Board of Directors. In addition, in accordance with the terms of the Fidelity Support
Agreement, Mr. Bohan was appointed to Revlon, Inc.’s Audit Committee and Mr. Wolfe was appointed

to Revlon, Inc.’s Compensation Committee and Nominating Committee. Fidelity has no further rights to
designate members to Revlon, Inc.’s Board of Directors. The Fidelity Support Agreement terminated
upon the consummation of the Revlon Exchange Transactions on March 25, 2004.

MacAndrews Support Agreement

In connection with the Revlon Exchange Transactions, Revlon, Inc. entered into a separate
agreement with MacAndrews & Forbes (as amended, the ‘‘MacAndrews Support Agreement’’), pursuant
to which MacAndrews & Forbes agreed to, among other things:

•

tender or cause to be tendered in the Revlon Exchange Offers, subject to the terms and
conditions thereof, approximately $1.0 million aggregate principal amount of Products Corpo-
ration’s outstanding 9% Senior Notes and $284.8 million aggregate principal amount of Products
Corporation’s outstanding 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes (collectively with the Fidelity Initial
Notes, the ‘‘Negotiated Transaction Notes’’), and the aggregate outstanding principal amount of
all Exchange Notes acquired by MacAndrews & Forbes prior to the expiration of the Revlon
Exchange Offers, in exchange for shares of Class A Common Stock;

elect to receive shares of Class A Common Stock in exchange for accrued and unpaid interest
(at the applicable rate) on any Exchange Notes tendered in the Revlon Exchange Offers;

upon the closing of the Revlon Exchange Offers, exchange all amounts outstanding (including
accrued and unpaid interest) as of the date of such closing under the Conversion Loans for
shares of Class A Common Stock in the Loan Conversion Transactions; and

upon the closing of the Revlon Exchange Offers, exchange all 546 shares of outstanding Series
A Preferred Stock held by it for shares of Class A Common Stock and convert all 4,333 shares
of outstanding Series B Preferred Stock held by it into shares of Class A Common Stock in the
Preferred Stock Transactions.

The MacAndrews Support Agreement terminated upon consummation of the Revlon Exchange

Transactions on March 25, 2004.

2004 Investment Agreement

In furtherance of the Fidelity Support Agreement and the MacAndrews Support Agreement, on
February 20, 2004, Revlon, Inc. entered into an investment agreement with MacAndrews & Forbes, which
was amended in March 2004 and March 2005 (as amended, the ‘‘2004 Investment Agreement’’). Pursuant
to the 2004 Investment Agreement, MacAndrews & Forbes committed to undertake certain transactions
with Revlon, Inc. that enabled, and will enable, the reduction of Product Corporation’s indebtedness by
an aggregate of $300 million between the date of the agreement and March 31, 2006, of which $109.7
million remained to be achieved as of December 31, 2004. (See ‘‘Recent Developments’’).

Agreements Relating to the Revlon Exchange Offers. To the extent that a minimum of $150 million
aggregate principal amount of Exchange Notes (other than the Negotiated Transaction Notes) had not
been tendered in the Revlon Exchange Offers, MacAndrews & Forbes agreed to back-stop the Revlon
Exchange Offers by subscribing for additional shares of Class A Common Stock, at a purchase price of
$2.50 per share, to the extent of any such shortfall. Because approximately $190.3 million aggregate
principal amount of Exchange Notes in excess of the Negotiated Transaction Notes was tendered in the
Revlon Exchange Offers, MacAndrews & Forbes was not required to back-stop the Revlon Exchange
Offers.

First Rights Offering.

In the event that MacAndrews & Forbes had purchased Class A Common
Stock for cash as part of the Revlon Exchange Offers in any of the circumstances described above,
Revlon, Inc. agreed to consummate a rights offering as soon as reasonably practicable after the closing of
the Revlon Exchange Offers in order to provide the other pre-Exchange Transaction stockholders the pro
rata opportunity to subscribe for shares of Class A Common Stock at the same $2.50 per share
subscription price. Because MacAndrews & Forbes did not purchase Class A Common Stock for cash in
connection with the Revlon Exchange Offers as described above, Revlon, Inc. did not conduct this ﬁrst
rights offering.

Second Rights Offering. As the next step in the Company’s debt reduction plan, and to the extent
that Revlon, Inc. had not accomplished an aggregate of $200 million of further debt reduction following
the Revlon Exchange Offers (which was to have included MacAndrews & Forbes’ back-stop, if any) and
the ﬁrst rights offering, Revlon, Inc. agreed, prior to December 31, 2004, to consummate a second rights
offering in order to provide all stockholders the pro rata opportunity to subscribe for shares of Class A
Common Stock. For these purposes, $200 million of further debt reduction was to be measured by adding
the aggregate principal amount of Exchange Notes tendered in the Revlon Exchange Offers (other than
the Negotiated Transaction Notes), the amount of any cash contributed by MacAndrews & Forbes (other
than to provide the cash consideration for the Revlon Exchange Offers) and the proceeds of the ﬁrst
rights offering described above. MacAndrews & Forbes had agreed to back-stop this second rights
offering by agreeing to purchase all shares not subscribed for by other stockholders, thereby ensuring that
the second rights offering would have been fully subscribed up to the amount necessary to meet the $200
million aggregate debt reduction target.

As a result of the $190.3 million aggregate principal amount of Exchange Notes tendered in the
Revlon Exchange Offers in excess of the Negotiated Transaction Notes, the second rights offering would
have been at an aggregate subscription price of only $9.7 million. Because the costs and expenses, as well
as the use of organizational resources, associated with a $9.7 million rights offering would be unduly
disproportionate, on March 24, 2004, the Fidelity Support Agreement, the MacAndrews Support
Agreement and the 2004 Investment Agreement relating to the debt reduction plan were each amended
(the ‘‘March 2004 Amendments’’) to enable Revlon, Inc. to satisfy this remaining $9.7 million of debt
reduction as part of the third stage equity offerings to occur by March 2006 as described below.

Third Stage Equity Offerings. As the last step in the debt reduction transactions, and in order to
reach an aggregate of $300 million of further debt reduction (inclusive of the debt reduction described
above), Revlon, Inc. agreed to consummate further equity offerings in such amounts necessary to meet
the $300 million aggregate debt reduction target by March 31, 2006. For these purposes, $300 million of
further debt reduction is measured by adding the aggregate principal amount of Exchange Notes tendered
in the Revlon Exchange Offers (other than the Negotiated Transaction Notes), the amount of any cash
contributed by MacAndrews & Forbes (other than to provide the cash consideration for the Revlon
Exchange Offers) and the proceeds of the ﬁrst and the second rights offerings described above. Pursuant
to the March 2004 Amendments, these third stage equity offerings will be at a minimum aggregate
offering amount of $109.7 million, representing the amount necessary to meet the $300 million aggregate
debt reduction target by March 31, 2006. MacAndrews & Forbes has agreed to back-stop up to $109.7
million in these additional equity offerings, thereby ensuring that the $300 million aggregate debt
reduction target will be fully met. In March 2005, Revlon, Inc. and MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings
amended MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings’ obligation under the 2004 Investment Agreement to backstop
a $109.7 equity offering to be conducted by Revlon, Inc. by accelerating such obligation to October 31,
2005 from March 31, 2006 in the event that the 81⁄8% Senior Notes have not been reﬁnanced as of such
date and Revlon, Inc. conducts an equity offering to affect such reﬁnancing. The net cash proceeds, if any,
received by Revlon, Inc. in the additional equity offerings will be transferred to Products Corporation to
be used to reduce outstanding indebtedness (other than revolving indebtedness unless there is a
corresponding commitment reduction). The terms of any such equity offerings, if necessary, will be set by
the Board of Directors of Revlon, Inc. and publicly announced at the appropriate times. (See ‘‘Recent
Developments’’).

MacAndrews & Forbes’ obligations to acquire capital stock pursuant to the 2004 Investment
Agreement are subject to customary conditions. The 2004 Investment Agreement cannot be amended or
waived without the prior written consent of Fidelity.

Voting and Other Support.

In addition, MacAndrews & Forbes agreed to use its commercially
reasonable efforts and take, or cause to be taken, all commercially reasonable actions in order to facilitate
the Debt Reduction Transactions. MacAndrews & Forbes also agreed to vote all of its shares of voting
stock in favor of, or consent to, the Debt Reduction Transactions.

Stockholders Agreement

Also in furtherance of the Fidelity Support Agreement, on February 20, 2004, Revlon, Inc. entered
into the Stockholders Agreement with Fidelity pursuant to which, among other things, Revlon, Inc.
agreed (i) to continue to maintain a majority of independent directors (as deﬁned by NYSE listing
standards) on the Board of Directors, as it currently does; (ii) to establish and maintain a nominating and
corporate governance committee of the Board of Directors (which was formed in March 2004, see ‘‘Board
of Directors and its Committees—Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’’); and (iii) to
certain restrictions with respect to Revlon, Inc.’s conducting any business or entering into any transactions
or series of related transactions with any of its afﬁliates, any holders of 10% or more of the outstanding
voting stock or any afﬁliates of such holders (in each case, other than its subsidiaries, including Products
Corporation). The Stockholders Agreement provides that any directors nominated by Fidelity in
accordance with the Fidelity Support Agreement shall be deemed to be independent for purposes of the
Stockholders Agreement; nonetheless, Revlon, Inc.’s Board of Directors has determined that each of
Messrs. Bohan and Wolfe (the directors nominated by Fidelity pursuant to the Fidelity Support
Agreement) qualiﬁes as independent within the meaning of Section 303A.02 of the NYSE Listed
Company Manual and under Revlon, Inc.’s Board Guidelines for Assessing Director Independence and,
with respect to Mr. Bohan, under Section 303A.06 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual. The
Stockholders Agreement will terminate at such time as Fidelity ceases to be the beneﬁcial holder of at
least 5% of Revlon, Inc.’s outstanding voting stock.

Other

Pursuant to a lease dated April 2, 1993 (the ‘‘Edison Lease’’), Revlon Holdings leased to Products
Corporation the Edison research and development facility for a term of up to 10 years with an annual rent
of $1.4 million and certain shared operating expenses payable by Products Corporation which, together
with the annual rent, were not to exceed $2.0 million per year. In August 1998, Revlon Holdings sold the
Edison facility to an unrelated third party, which assumed substantially all liability for environmental
claims and compliance costs relating to the Edison facility, and in connection with the sale Products
Corporation terminated the Edison Lease and entered into a new lease with the new owner. Revlon
Holdings agreed to indemnify Products Corporation through September 1, 2013 (the term of the new
lease) to the extent that rent under the new lease exceeds rent that would have been payable under the
terminated Edison Lease had it not been terminated. The net amount reimbursed by Revlon Holdings to
Products Corporation with respect to the Edison facility for 2004 was $0.3 million.

During 2004, Products Corporation leased a small amount of space at certain facilities to
MacAndrews & Forbes or its afﬁliates pursuant to occupancy agreements and leases, including space at
Products Corporation’s New York headquarters. The rent paid by MacAndrews & Forbes or its afﬁliates
to Products Corporation for 2004 was $0.3 million.

The 2004 Credit Agreement is, and prior to the redemption of all Product Corporation’s outstanding
12% Senior Secured Notes on August 23, 2004, the 12% Senior Secured Notes were, supported by, among
other things, guaranties from Revlon, Inc. and, subject to certain limited exceptions, all of the domestic
subsidiaries of Products Corporation. The obligations under such guaranties are and were secured by,
among other things, the capital stock of Products Corporation and, subject to certain limited exceptions,
the capital stock of all of Products Corporation’s domestic subsidiaries and 66% of the capital stock of
Products Corporation’s and its domestic subsidiaries’ ﬁrst-tier foreign subsidiaries. In connection with the
Revlon Exchange Transactions, on February 11, 2004, Revlon, Inc. entered into supplemental indentures
pursuant to which it agreed to guarantee the obligations of Products Corporation under the indentures
governing Product Corporation’s 81⁄8% Senior Notes, 9% Senior Notes and 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated
Notes.

In March 2002, prior to the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Products Corporation made
an advance of $1.8 million to Mr. Stahl pursuant to his employment agreement, which was entered into
in February 2002, for tax assistance related to a grant of restricted stock provided to Mr. Stahl pursuant
to such agreement, which loan bears interest at the applicable federal rate. In May 2002, prior to the
passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Products Corporation made an advance of $2.0 million to Mr.

Stahl pursuant to his employment agreement in connection with the purchase of his principal residence
in the New York City metropolitan area, which loan bears interest at the applicable federal rate. Mr. Stahl
repaid $135,968 of such loan during 2004. Pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr. Stahl receives from
Products Corporation additional compensation payable on a monthly basis equal to the amount actually
paid by him in respect of interest and principal on such $2.0 million advance, which for 2004 was $135,968.
Products Corporation also pays Mr. Stahl a gross up for any taxes payable by Mr. Stahl as a result of such
additional compensation, which tax gross up amount was $69,650 in 2004.

During 2000, prior to the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Products Corporation made the
2000 Loan to Mr. Greeff, an advance of $0.8 million, pursuant to his employment agreement. The 2000
Loan bears interest at the applicable federal rate and was payable in 5 equal annual installments on each
of May 9, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, and on May 9, 2005. Mr. Greeff repaid $0.2 million of the 2000 Loan
during 2004 and made other scheduled repayments during each of 2001, 2002 and 2003. Pursuant to his
employment agreement, Mr. Greeff was entitled to receive bonuses from Products Corporation, payable
on each May 9th commencing on May 9, 2001 and ending on May 9, 2005, in each case equal to the sum
of the principal and interest on the advance repaid in respect of such year by Mr. Greeff, provided that
he remained employed by Products Corporation on each such May 9th. A bonus installment of $0.2
million was paid by Products Corporation to Mr. Greeff in May 2004. Pursuant to the terms of the Greeff
Separation Agreement, as a result of the fact that Mr. Greeff ceased employment in February 2005, Mr.
Greeff is scheduled to repay the remaining amount of the 2000 Loan by May 9, 2005 and Products
Corporation is expected to pay the ﬁnal bonus installment to Mr. Greeff on or about May 9, 2005.

During 2004, Products Corporation made payments of $0.4 million to Ms. Ellen Barkin (spouse of
Mr. Perelman) under a written agreement pursuant to which she provides voiceover services for certain
of the Company’s advertisements, which payments were competitive with industry rates for similarly
situated talent.

During 2004, Products Corporation obtained advertising, media buying and direct marketing services
from various subsidiaries of WPP. Ms. Robinson is employed by one of WPP’s subsidiaries, however, Ms.
Robinson is neither an executive ofﬁcer of, nor does she hold any material equity interest in, WPP.
Products Corporation paid WPP $0.4 million for such services in 2004, which fees were less than 1% of the
Company’s estimate of WPP’s consolidated gross revenues for 2004 and less than 1% of the Company’s
consolidated gross revenues for 2004. Products Corporation’s decision to engage WPP was based upon
WPP’s professional expertise in understanding the advertising needs of the consumer packaged goods
industry, as well as its global presence in many of the international markets in which the Company
operates, and the rates paid were competitive with industry rates for similarly situated advertising
agencies.

Products Corporation employed Mr. Perelman’s daughter in a marketing position through June 2004,

with compensation paid for that period of 2004 of less than $60,000.

Products Corporation employed Mr. Drapkin’s daughter in a marketing position through June 2004,

with compensation paid for that period of 2004 of less than $60,000.

During 2004, Products Corporation paid $1.0 million to a nationally-recognized security services
company, in which MacAndrews & Forbes has a controlling interest, for security ofﬁcer services. Products
Corporation’s decision to engage such ﬁrm was based upon its expertise in the ﬁeld of security services,
and the rates were competitive with industry rates for similarly situated security ﬁrms.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

AUDIT FEES

The Audit Committee adopted an Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy for pre-approving all
permissible audit and non-audit services performed by KPMG after the ﬁnal SEC rules became effective
on May 6, 2003. In November 2004, the Audit Committee approved the Audit Committee Pre-Approval
Policy for 2005.

The aggregate fees billed for professional services by KPMG in 2003 and 2004 for these various

services were (in millions):

Types of Fees

Audit Fees (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Audit-Related Fees. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax Fees (b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
All Other Fees. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total Fees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2004

$5.6
0.1
0.5
—

$6.2

2003

$3.0
0.1
0.3
—

$3.4

(a)

In 2004, audit fees include fees for professional services rendered for the audits of (i) the ﬁnancial statements, (ii)
management’s assessment of effectiveness of internal control over ﬁnancial reporting and (iii) the effectiveness of internal
control over ﬁnancial reporting.

(b)

Includes $0.2 and $0.1 with respect to tax preparation and compliance fees in 2004 and 2003, respectively.

In the above table, in accordance with the SEC deﬁnitions and rules, ‘‘audit fees’’ are fees the
Company paid KPMG for professional services rendered for the audits of (i) the Company’s annual
ﬁnancial statements, (ii) management’s assessment of effectiveness of internal control over ﬁnancial
reporting and (iii) the review of ﬁnancial statements included in the Company’s Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q, and for services that are normally provided by the auditor in connection with statutory and
regulatory ﬁlings or engagements; ‘‘audit-related fees’’ are fees billed by KPMG for assurance and related
services that are traditionally performed by the auditor, including services performed by KPMG related
to employee beneﬁt plan audits, the 2003 Rights Offering, the Revlon Exchange Transactions consum-
mated in 2004 and attest services not required by statute or regulation; ‘‘tax fees’’ are fees for permissible
tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning; and ‘‘all other fees’’ are fees billed by KPMG to the Company
for any permissible services not included in the ﬁrst three categories.

During 2004, Revlon, Inc.’s Audit Committee speciﬁcally pre-approved the services performed by
KPMG in connection with (i) Revlon, Inc.’s and Products Corporation’s 2004 audits and (ii) the Debt
Reduction Transactions in 2004. During 2003, Revlon, Inc.’s Audit Committee speciﬁcally pre-approved
the services performed by KPMG in connection with (i) Revlon, Inc.’s and Products Corporation’s 2003
audit and (ii) Revlon, Inc.’s 2003 Rights Offering. All of the other services performed by KPMG for
Revlon, Inc.’s and Products Corporation’s during 2004 and 2003 from and after May 6, 2003 (the effective
date of the applicable ﬁnal SEC rules) were either expressly pre-approved by Revlon, Inc.’s Audit
Committee or were pre-approved in accordance with Revlon, Inc.’s Audit Committee’s Pre-Approval
Policy (attached as Exhibit 99.1) and Revlon, Inc.’s Audit Committee was provided with quarterly updates
as to the nature of such services and fees paid for such services.

Website Availability of Reports and Other Corporate Governance Information

In January 2004, the Company adopted a comprehensive corporate governance program, including
Corporate Governance Guidelines for Revlon, Inc.’s Board of Directors, Revlon, Inc.’s Board Guidelines
for Assessing Director Independence and new charters for the Revlon, Inc.’s Audit and Compensation
and Stock Plan Committees. Revlon, Inc maintains a corporate investor relations website, www.revlon-
inc.com, where stockholders and other interested persons may review, without charge, among other
things, Revlon, Inc.’s corporate governance materials and certain SEC ﬁlings (such as Revlon, Inc.’s
annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, proxy

statements, annual reports, Section 16 reports reﬂecting certain changes in the stock ownership of Revlon,
Inc.’s directors and Section 16 executive ofﬁcers, and certain other documents ﬁled with the Commission),
each of which are generally available on such site on the same business day as the ﬁling date with the
Commission. In addition, under the section of the website entitled, ‘‘Corporate Governance,’’ Revlon, Inc.
posts the latest versions of its Corporate Governance Guidelines, Board Guidelines for Assessing
Director Independence, charters for Revlon, Inc.’s Audit Committee, Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee and Compensation and Stock Plan Committee, as well as Revlon, Inc.’s Code of
Business Conduct, which includes Revlon, Inc.’s Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Ofﬁcers, each of
which the Company will provide in print, without charge, upon written request to Robert K. Kretzman,
Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Ofﬁcer, Revlon, Inc., 237 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10017.

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.

(a)

List of documents ﬁled as part of this Report:

(1) Consolidated Financial Statements and Independent Auditors’ Report included

herein: See Index on page F-1.

(2) Financial Statement Schedule: See Index on page F-1.

All other schedules are omitted as they are inapplicable or the required information
is furnished in the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company or the Notes
thereto.

(3) List of Exhibits:

Certiﬁcate of Incorporation and By-laws.

Restated Certiﬁcate of Incorporation of Revlon, Inc., dated April 30, 2004 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Revlon, Inc. for the
quarter ended March 31, 2004 ﬁled with the Commission on May 17, 2004 (the ‘‘Revlon, Inc.
2004 First Quarter 10-Q’’)).

Amended and Restated By-Laws of Revlon, Inc. dated as of March 22, 2004 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Revlon, Inc. 2004 First Quarter 10-Q).

Instruments Deﬁning the Rights of Security Holders, Including Indentures.

Credit Agreement, dated as of July 9, 2004, among Products Corporation and certain local
borrowing subsidiaries, as borrowers, the lenders and issuing lenders party thereto, Citicorp
USA, Inc., as term loan administrative agent, Citicorp USA, Inc. as multi-currency
administrative agent, Citicorp USA, Inc., as collateral agent, UBS Securities LLC, as
syndication agent, and Citigroup Global Markets Inc., as sole lead arranger and sole
bookrunner (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.34 to the Current Report on Form 8-K
of Products Corporation ﬁled with the Commission on July 13, 2004 (the ‘‘Products
Corporation July 13, 2004 Form 8-K’’)).

Pledge and Security Agreement, dated as of July 9, 2004, among Revlon, Inc., Products
Corporation and the additional grantors party thereto, in favor of Citicorp USA, Inc., as
collateral agent for the secured parties (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.35 to the
Products Corporation July 13, 2004 Form 8-K).

Intercreditor and Collateral Agency Agreement, dated as of July 9, 2004, among Citicorp
USA, Inc., as administrative agent for the multi-currency lenders and issuing lenders,
Citicorp USA, Inc., as administrative agent for the term loan lenders, Citicorp USA, Inc.,
as collateral agent for the secured parties, Revlon, Inc., Products Corporation and each
other loan party (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.36 to the Products Corporation
July 13, 2004 Form 8-K).

Indenture, dated as of February 1, 1998, between Revlon Escrow Corp. (‘‘Revlon Escrow’’)
and U.S. Bank Trust National Association (formerly known as First Trust National
Association), as trustee, relating to the 81⁄8% Senior Notes due 2006 (as amended, the ‘‘81⁄8%
Senior Notes Indenture’’) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Amendment No. 1
to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of Products Corporation ﬁled with the
Commission on April 3, 1998, File No. 333-47875 (the ‘‘Products Corporation April 1998
Form S-1 Amendment’’)).

3.1

3.2

4.1

4.2

4.3

4.4

4.5

4.6

4.7

4.8

4.9

4.10

4.11

4.12

4.13

10.

10.1

First Supplemental Indenture, dated April 1, 1998, among Products Corporation, Revlon
Escrow, and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as trustee, amending the 81⁄8% Senior
Notes Indenture (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Products Corporation
April 1998 Form S-1 Amendment).

Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 11, 2004, among Products Corporation,
U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as trustee, and Revlon, Inc., as guarantor, amending
the 81⁄8% Senior Notes Indenture (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.29 to the Current
Report on Form 8-K of Revlon, Inc. ﬁled with the Commission on February 12, 2004 (the
‘‘Revlon, Inc. February 12, 2004 Form 8-K’’)).

Indenture, dated as of February 1, 1998, between Revlon Escrow and U.S. Bank Trust
National Association, as trustee, relating to the 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2008
(as amended, the ‘‘85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes Indenture’’) (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 4.3 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of Products Corporation ﬁled with
the Commission on March 12, 1998, File No. 333-47875 (the ‘‘Products Corporation March
1998 Form S-1’’)).

First Supplemental Indenture, dated March 4, 1998, among Products Corporation, Revlon
Escrow, and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as trustee, amending the 85⁄8% Senior
Subordinated Notes Indenture (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Products
Corporation March 1998 Form S-1).

Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 11, 2004, among Products Corporation,
U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as trustee, and Revlon, Inc. as guarantor, amending
the 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes Indenture (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.31
of the Revlon, Inc. February 12, 2004 Form 8-K).

Indenture, dated as of November 6, 1998, between Products Corporation and U.S. Bank
Trust National Association, as trustee, relating to Products Corporation’s 9% Senior Notes
due 2006 (as amended, the ‘‘9% Senior Notes Indenture’’) (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.13 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Revlon, Inc. for the quarter ended
September 30, 1998 ﬁled with the Commission on November 16, 1998).

First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 11, 2004, among Products Corporation,
U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as trustee, and Revlon, Inc., as guarantor, amending
the 9% Senior Notes Indenture (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.30 of the Revlon,
Inc. February 12, 2004 Form 8-K).

Indenture, dated as of March 16, 2005, between Products Corporation and U.S. Bank
National Association, as trustee, relating to Products Corporation’s 9½% Senior Notes due
2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.12 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for
the year ended December 31, 2004 of Products Corporation (the ‘‘2004 Products Corporation
10-K/A’’)).

Registration Agreement, dated as of March 16, 2005, between Products Corporation and
Citigroup Global Markets Inc., as representative for the Initial Purchasers named therein
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.13 to the 2004 Products Corporation 10-K/A).

Material Contracts.

Tax Sharing Agreement, dated as of June 24, 1992, among MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings,
Revlon, Inc., Products Corporation and certain subsidiaries of Products Corporation, as
amended and restated as of January 1, 2001 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to
the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Products Corporation for the ﬁscal year ended
December 31, 2001 ﬁled with the Commission on February 25, 2002 (the ‘‘Products
Corporation 2001 Form 10-K’’)).

10.2

10.3

10.4

10.5

10.6

10.7

10.8

10.9

10.10

10.11

10.12

10.13

10.14

Tax Sharing Agreement, dated as of March 26, 2004, by and among Revlon, Inc., Products
Corporation and certain subsidiaries of Products Corporation (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.25 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Products Corporation for the
quarter ended March 31, 2004 ﬁled with the Commission on May 17, 2004).

Employment Agreement, dated as of February 17, 2002, between Products Corporation and
Jack L. Stahl (the ‘‘Stahl Employment Agreement’’) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.17 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Revlon, Inc. for the quarter ended March
31, 2002 ﬁled with the Commission on May 15, 2002).

First Amendment to the Stahl Employment Agreement, effective as of December 17, 2004
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.35 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Revlon,
Inc. ﬁled with the Commission on December 22, 2004 (the ‘‘Revlon, Inc. December 22, 2004
Form 8-K’’)).

Employment Agreement, dated as of August 18, 2003, between Products Corporation and
Thomas E. McGuire (the ‘‘McGuire Employment Agreement’’) (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.5 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Revlon, Inc. for the quarter ended
September 30, 2003 ﬁled with the Commission on November 14, 2003 (the ‘‘Revlon, Inc.
2003 Third Quarter Form 10-Q’’)).

Amendment to McGuire Employment Agreement, dated as of December 17, 2004
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.36 to the Revlon, Inc. December 22, 2004 Form
8-K).

Employment Agreement, amended and restated as of May 9, 2000, between Products
Corporation and Douglas H. Greeff (as amended, the ‘‘Greeff Employment Agreement’’)
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Revlon, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2000 ﬁled with the Commission on August 14,
2000).

Amendment, dated as of June 18, 2001, to the Greeff Employment Agreement (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Products Corporation
for year ended December 31, 2001 ﬁled with the Commission on February 25, 2002).

Amendment, dated as of August 18, 2003, to the Greeff Employment Agreement
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Revlon, Inc. 2003 Third Quarter Form
10-Q).

Employment Agreement, dated as of November 1, 2002, between Products Corporation
and Robert K. Kretzman (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Annual Report
on Form 10-K of Revlon, Inc. for the ﬁscal year ended December 31, 2004 ﬁled with the
Commission on March 10, 2005 (the ‘‘Revlon, Inc. 2004 Form 10-K’’)).

Amended and Restated Revlon, Inc. Stock Plan (as amended the ‘‘Stock Plan’’) (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 of Revlon, Inc. ﬁled
with the Commission on June 4, 2004, File No. 333-116160).

Current form of Nonqualiﬁed Stock Option Agreement under the Stock Plan (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Revlon, Inc. 2004 Form 10-K).

Current form of Restricted Stock Agreement under the Stock Plan (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Revlon, Inc. 2004 Form 10-K).

Revlon, Inc. 2002 Supplemental Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the
Registration Statement on Form S-8 of Revlon, Inc. ﬁled with the Commission on June 24,
2002, File No. 333-91040).

10.15

10.16

10.17

10.18

10.19

10.20

10.21

10.22

10.23

10.24

10.25

10.26

10.27

10.28

Revlon Executive Bonus Plan (Amended and Restated as of September 1, 2002)
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Revlon,
Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2002 ﬁled with the Commission on March 21, 2003
(the ‘‘Revlon, Inc. 2002 Form 10-K’’)).

Amended and Restated Revlon Pension Equalization Plan, amended and restated as of
December 14, 1998 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Revlon, Inc. for year ended December 31, 1998 ﬁled with the Commission on
March 3, 1999).

Executive Supplemental Medical Expense Plan Summary, dated July 2000 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Revlon, Inc. 2002 Form 10-K).

Beneﬁt Plans Assumption Agreement, dated as of July 1, 1992, by and among Revlon
Holdings, Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.25 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1992 of
Products Corporation ﬁled with the Commission on March 12, 1993).

Revlon Executive Severance Policy, as amended July 1, 2002 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.13 to the Revlon, Inc. 2002 Form 10-K).

Support Agreement, dated as of February 11, 2004, between Revlon, Inc. and MacAndrews
& Forbes Holdings (as amended, the ‘‘MacAndrews Support Agreement’’) (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Revlon, Inc. February 12, 2004 Form 8-K).

Amendment, dated as of February 20, 2004, to the MacAndrews Support Agreement
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Revlon,
Inc. ﬁled with the Commission on February 23, 2004 (the ‘‘Revlon, Inc. February 23, 2004
Form 8-K’’)).

Amendment, dated as of March 24, 2004, to the MacAndrews Support Agreement
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Revlon,
Inc. ﬁled with the Commission on March 26, 2004 (the ‘‘Revlon, Inc. March 26, 2004 Form
8-K’’)).

Support Agreement, dated as of February 11, 2004, between Revlon, Inc. and Fidelity (as
amended, the ‘‘Fidelity Support Agreement’’) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24
of Revlon, Inc. February 12, 2004 Form 8-K).

Amendment, dated as of February 20, 2004, to the Fidelity Support Agreement (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to the Revlon, Inc. February 23, 2004 Form 8-K).

Amendment, dated as of March 24, 2004, to the Fidelity Support Agreement (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.32 to the Revlon, Inc. March 26, 2004 Form 8-K).

2004 Senior Unsecured Line of Credit Agreement, dated as of July 9, 2004, between
Products Corporation and MacAndrews & Forbes (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.34 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Revlon, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30,
2004 ﬁled with the Commission on August 16, 2004).

Stockholders Agreement, dated as of February 20, 2004, by and between Revlon, Inc. and
Fidelity (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 to the Revlon, Inc. February 23, 2004
Form 8-K).

Investment Agreement, dated as of February 5, 2003, among Revlon, Inc., Products
Corporation and MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1
to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Products Corporation ﬁled with the Commission on
February 5, 2003).

10.29

10.30

10.31

10.32

21.

21.1

Investment Agreement, dated as of February 20, 2004, by and between Revlon, Inc. and
MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings (as amended, the ‘‘2004 Investment Agreement’’)
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 of the Revlon, Inc. February 23, 2004 Form
8-K).

Amendment, dated as of March 24, 2004, to the 2004 Investment Agreement (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.33 to the Revlon, Inc. March 26, 2004 Form 8-K).

Second Amendment, dated as of March 7, 2005, to the 2004 Investment Agreement
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to the Revlon, Inc. 2004 Form 10-K).

Form of Purchase Agreement between Products Corporation and the Initial Purchasers
named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 to the 2004 Products Corporation
10-K/A).

Subsidiaries.

Subsidiaries of Revlon, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 21.1 to the Revlon, Inc.
2004 Form 10-K).

23.

Consents of Experts and Counsel.

*23.1

Consent of KPMG LLP.

24.

24.1

24.2

24.3

24.4

24.5

24.6

24.7

24.8

24.9

*31.1

*31.2

32.1
(furnished
herewith)

Powers of Attorney.

Power of Attorney executed by Ronald O. Perelman (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
24.1 to the Revlon, Inc. 2004 Form 10-K).

Power of Attorney executed by Howard Gittis (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 24.2
to the Revlon, Inc. 2004 Form 10-K).

Power of Attorney executed by Donald G. Drapkin (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
24.3 to the Revlon, Inc. 2004 Form 10-K).

Power of Attorney executed by Alan S. Bernikow (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
24.4 to the Revlon, Inc. 2004 Form 10-K).

Power of Attorney executed by Paul J. Bohan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 24.5 to
the Revlon, Inc. 2004 Form 10-K).

Power of Attorney executed by Meyer Feldberg (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 24.6
to the Revlon, Inc. 2004 Form 10-K).

Power of Attorney executed by Edward J. Landau (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
24.7 to the Revlon, Inc. 2004 Form 10-K).

Power of Attorney executed by Linda Gosden Robinson (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 24.8 to the Revlon, Inc. 2004 Form 10-K).

Power of Attorney executed by Kenneth L. Wolfe (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
24.9 to the Revlon, Inc. 2004 Form 10-K).

Certiﬁcation of Jack L. Stahl, Chief Executive Ofﬁcer, dated April 12, 2005, pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act.

Certiﬁcation of Thomas E. McGuire, Chief Financial Ofﬁcer, dated April 12, 2005, pursuant
to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act.

Certiﬁcation of Jack L. Stahl, Chief Executive Ofﬁcer, dated April 12, 2005, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2
(furnished
herewith)

99.1

Certiﬁcation of Thomas E. McGuire, Chief Financial Ofﬁcer, dated April 12, 2005, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.

Revlon, Inc. Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
99.1 to the Revlon, Inc. 2004 Form 10-K).

* Filed herewith.

REVLON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULE

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Consolidated Financial

Statements) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Internal Control Over

Financial Reporting) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Audited Financial Statements:

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Consolidated Statements of Operations for each of the years in the three-year period

ended December 31, 2004. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Deﬁciency and Comprehensive Loss for each

of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the years in the three-year period

ended December 31, 2004. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Page

F-2

F-3

F-5

F-6

F-7

F-8

F-9

Financial Statement Schedule:

Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

F-52

F-1

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Revlon, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Revlon, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’
deﬁciency and comprehensive loss, and cash ﬂows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2004. In connection with our audits of the consolidated ﬁnancial statements, we also have
audited the ﬁnancial statement schedule as listed on the index on page F-1. These consolidated ﬁnancial
statements and the ﬁnancial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated ﬁnancial statements and the ﬁnancial
statement schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the ﬁnancial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the ﬁnancial statements.
An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and signiﬁcant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall ﬁnancial statement presentation. We believe that our audits
provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated ﬁnancial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the ﬁnancial position of Revlon, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the
results of their operations and their cash ﬂows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2004, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion,
the related ﬁnancial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated ﬁnancial
statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the effectiveness of Revlon, Inc. and subsidiaries internal control over ﬁnancial
reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO),
and our report dated April 8, 2005 expressed an unqualiﬁed opinion on management’s assessment of, and
an adverse opinion on the effective operation of, internal control over ﬁnancial reporting.

KPMG LLP

New York, New York
March 9, 2005

F-2

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Revlon, Inc.:

We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report
on Internal Control over Financial Reporting in Item 9A(b), that Revlon, Inc. did not maintain effective
internal control over ﬁnancial reporting as of December 31, 2004, because of the effect of a material
weakness identiﬁed in management’s assessment that the Company’s internal control over the review and
validation of the data input and outputs used in the Company’s estimates of reserves for sales returns in
the United States were ineffective, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
Revlon, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over ﬁnancial
reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over ﬁnancial reporting. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness
of the Company’s internal control over ﬁnancial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether effective internal control over ﬁnancial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over ﬁnancial reporting,
evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of
internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over ﬁnancial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of ﬁnancial reporting and the preparation of ﬁnancial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal
control over ﬁnancial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reﬂect the transactions and dispositions of the
assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to
permit preparation of ﬁnancial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles,
and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations
of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention
or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have
a material effect on the ﬁnancial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over ﬁnancial reporting may not prevent or detect
misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk
that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance
with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

A material weakness is a control deﬁciency, or combination of control deﬁciencies, that results in more
than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim ﬁnancial statements will
not be prevented or detected. The following material weakness has been identiﬁed and included in
management’s assessment as of December 31, 2004: The Company’s policies and procedures related to the
periodic review and validation of the data inputs and outputs used in the Company’s determination of
estimates of reserves for sales returns in the United States were not effective. As a result of this deﬁciency,
an error in accounting for the reserve for sales returns in the United States as of December 31, 2004
occurred and was not detected by the Company. In this speciﬁc instance, performance of the Company’s
review procedures did not identify the omission of inventory amounts located at certain stores acquired
by a customer of the Company in 2004. This deﬁciency constituted a material weakness, as deﬁned in the
ﬁrst sentence of this paragraph,
in the Company’s internal control over ﬁnancial reporting as of
December 31, 2004.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Revlon, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December
31, 2004 and 2003, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ deﬁciency and comprehensive

F-3

loss, and cash ﬂows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004. The
aforementioned material weakness was considered in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit
tests applied in our audit of the 2004 consolidated ﬁnancial statements, and this report does not affect our
report dated March 9, 2005, which expressed an unqualiﬁed opinion on those consolidated ﬁnancial
statements.

In our opinion, management’s assessment that Revlon, Inc. did not maintain effective internal control
over ﬁnancial reporting as of December 31, 2004, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on criteria
established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by COSO. Also, in our opinion, because
of the effect of the material weakness described above on the objectives of the control criteria, Revlon,
Inc. has not maintained effective internal control over ﬁnancial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based
on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by COSO.

KPMG LLP

New York, New York
April 8, 2005

F-4

REVLON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(dollars in millions, except per share data)

Current assets:

ASSETS

Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Trade receivables, less allowances of $19.0 and $19.4 as of

December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prepaid expenses and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Property, plant and equipment, net
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Goodwill, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

December 31,
2004

December 31,
2003

120.8

56.5

200.6
154.7
69.7

545.8
118.7
149.9
186.1

182.5
142.7
33.9

415.6
132.1
158.4
186.1

Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 1,000.5

892.2

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY

Current liabilities:

Short-term borrowings — third parties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Current portion of long-term debt — third parties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued expenses and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term debt — third parties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term debt — afﬁliates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other long-term liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

36.6
10.5
95.2
283.2

425.5
1,308.2
—
286.7

28.0
—
97.4
321.9

447.3
1,723.3
146.2
301.0

Stockholders’ deﬁciency:

Preferred stock, par value $.01 per share; 20,000,000 shares authorized,
0 and 546 shares of Series A Preferred Stock issued and outstanding
as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Preferred stock, par value $.01 per share; 20,000,000 shares authorized,

0 and 4,333 shares of Series B Preferred Stock issued and
outstanding as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively . . . . . . .

Class B Convertible Common Stock, par value $.01 per share;

200,000,000 shares authorized, 31,250,000 issued and outstanding as
of December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Class A Common Stock, par value $.01 per share; 900,000,000 and

350,000,000 shares authorized and 344,592,944 and 40,178,451 shares
issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2004 and 2003,
respectively . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Additional paid-in-capital (capital deﬁciency) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accumulated deﬁcit
Deferred compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accumulated other comprehensive loss

Total stockholders’ deﬁciency . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

—

0.3

54.6

—

0.3

3.4
771.4
(1,658.2)
(12.5)
(124.3)

(1,019.9)

0.4
(139.0)
(1,515.7)
(4.2)
(122.0)

(1,725.6)

Total liabilities and stockholders’ deﬁciency . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 1,000.5

892.2

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-5

REVLON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(dollars in millions, except per share data)

Year Ended December 31,
2003

2004

2002

Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cost of sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,297.2
485.3

1,299.3
501.1

1,119.4
503.7

Gross proﬁt

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Selling, general and administrative expenses . . . . . . . . . . . .
Restructuring costs and other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Operating income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other expenses (income):

Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortization of debt issuance costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign currency (gains) losses, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loss on sale of brand and facilities, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loss on early extinguishment of debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Miscellaneous, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other expenses, net

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Loss before income taxes
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Provision for income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Basic and diluted loss per common share:

Net loss per common share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

811.9
717.6
5.8

88.5

130.8
(4.8)
8.2
(5.2)
—
90.7
2.0

221.7

(133.2)
9.3

798.2
770.9
6.0

21.3

174.5
(4.3)
8.9
(5.0)
—
—
0.5

174.6

(153.3)
0.5

(142.5)

(153.8)

615.7
717.0
13.6

(114.9)

159.0
(3.5)
7.7
1.4
1.0
—
1.2

166.8

(281.7)
4.8

(286.5)

(0.47)

(2.47)

(5.36)

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
Basic and diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

301,053,334

62,327,726

53,461,796

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-6

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

REVLON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(dollars in millions)

Preferred
Stock

Common
Stock

Additional
Paid-In-
Capital
(Capital
Deﬁciency)

Accumulated
Deﬁcit

Deferred
Compensation

$ 54.6

$0.5

$(192.6)

$(1,075.4)

$ (8.1)
1.7

Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss

$ (61.1)

Total
Stockholders’
Deﬁciency

$(1,282.1)
1.7

Balance, January 1, 2002 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortization of deferred compensation . . .
Comprehensive loss:

Net loss
Adjustment for minimum pension

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Revaluation of foreign currency forward

exchange contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . .

Currency translation adjustment

Total comprehensive loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

0.5

0.2

Balance, December 31, 2002 . . . . . . . . . . . . .

54.6

Net proceeds from 2003 Rights Offering

(See Note 9) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Reduction of liabilities assumed from

indirect parent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortization of deferred compensation . . .
Comprehensive loss:

Net loss
Adjustment for minimum pension

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Revaluation of foreign currency forward

exchange contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . .

Currency translation adjustment

Total comprehensive loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Balance, December 31, 2003 . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Common stock issued in exchange for debt,

54.6

accrued interest and preferred stock (b) . .

(54.6)

0.7

3.0

Reduction of liabilities assumed from

indirect parent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stock-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortization of deferred compensation . . .
Comprehensive loss:

Net loss (b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adjustment for minimum pension

liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Revaluation of foreign currency forward

exchange contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . .

Currency translation adjustment

Total comprehensive loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(286.5)

(67.5)

(0.1)
(4.0)

(286.5)

(67.5)

(0.1)
(4.0)

(358.1)

(192.6)

(1,361.9)

(6.4)

(132.7)

(1,638.5)

46.7

6.9 (a)

2.2

(153.8)

46.9

6.9
2.2

(153.8)

1.5

(1.4)
10.6

(143.1)

1.5

(1.4)
10.6

(139.0)

(1,515.7)

(4.2)

(122.0)

(1,725.6)

879.3

16.4 (a)
14.7

(14.7)
6.4

(142.5)

827.7

16.4
—
6.4

(142.5)

(1.6)

(1.3)
0.6

(144.8)

(1.6)

(1.3)
0.6

Balance, December 31, 2004 . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ —

$3.7

$ 771.4

$(1,658.2)

$(12.5)

$(124.3)

$(1,019.9)

(a) During 2003, the Company resolved various tax audits, which resulted in a tax beneﬁt of $13.9 of which $6.9 was recorded directly to capital deﬁciency
since it relates to liabilities assumed by Revlon Consumer Products Corporation in connection with the transfer agreements related to Revlon
Consumer Products Corporation’s formation in 1992. During 2004, the Company resolved various state and federal tax audits and determined that
certain tax liabilities assumed by Revlon Consumer Products Corporation in connection with transfer agreements related to Revlon Consumer Products
Corporation’s formation in 1992 were no longer probable. As a result, $16.4 was recorded directly to capital deﬁciency. (See Note 16).

(b) The changes in Preferred Stock, Common Stock, Additional Paid-in-Capital (Capital Deﬁciency) and a portion of Accumulated Deﬁcit are a result of

the consummation of the Revlon Exchange Transactions. (See Note 9).

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-7

REVLON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(dollars in millions)

Year Ended December 31,
2003

2004

2002

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used for operating

activities:
Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortization of debt discount . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stock compensation amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loss on early extinguishment of debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loss on sale of brand and certain assets, net
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Change in assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions and dispositions:

(Increase) decrease in trade receivables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Increase) decrease in inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets . .
(Decrease) increase in accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Decrease) increase in accrued expenses and other current

liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchase of permanent displays . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash used for operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Capital expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sale of marketable securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from the sale of brand and certain assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash used for investing activities

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings — third parties . . . . .
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt — third parties . . . . . . . .
Repayment of long-term debt — third parties, including premiums . . . .
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt — afﬁliates . . . . . . . . . . . .
Repayment of long-term debt — afﬁliates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net proceeds from the 2003 Rights Offering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Issuance of Series C preferred stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Redemption of Series C preferred stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Payment of ﬁnancing costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash provided by ﬁnancing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . .
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Supplemental schedule of cash ﬂow information:

Cash paid during the period for:

$ (142.5) $(153.8) $(286.5)

106.1
1.8
6.4
77.3
—

(12.1)
(7.8)
(22.3)
(4.4)

(31.6)
(56.0)
(9.1)
(94.2)

(18.9)
—
—
(18.9)

107.6
3.1
2.2
—
—

40.2
(5.7)
2.9
0.5

114.6
2.6
1.7
—
1.0

(9.4)
30.3
3.7
6.3

(80.0)
(72.9)
(10.5)
(166.4)

98.4
(66.2)
(8.8)
(112.3)

(28.6)
—
5.3
(23.3)

(16.0)
1.8
—
(14.2)

6.0
1,136.2
(960.2)
42.4
(19.5)
—
—
—
(30.4)
174.5
2.9
64.3
56.5
$ 120.8

(1.6)
233.1
(239.3)
178.1
(62.6)
46.9
50.0
(50.0)
(3.5)
151.1
9.3
(29.3)
85.8
$ 56.5

8.0
175.6
(73.0)
—
—
—
—
—
(0.3)
110.3
(1.3)
(17.5)
103.3
$ 85.8

Interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income taxes, net of refunds

$ 133.9
11.1

$ 160.8
6.7

$ 155.2
3.6

Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and ﬁnancing activities:
Conversion of long-term debt and accrued interest to Class A

Common Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 813.8

$ — $ —

Exchange and conversion of Series A and Series B Preferred

Stock to Class A Common Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Reduction of liabilities assumed from indirect parent . . . . . . . . . . . .

54.6
16.4

—
6.9

—
—

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-8

REVLON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(dollars in millions, except per share data)

1. Signiﬁcant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation:

Revlon, Inc. (and together with its subsidiaries, the ‘‘Company’’) conducts its business exclusively
through its direct subsidiary, Revlon Consumer Products Corporation and its subsidiaries (‘‘Products
Corporation’’). The Company manufactures and sells an extensive array of cosmetics and skin care,
fragrances and personal care products. The Company’s principal customers include large mass volume
retailers and chain drug stores, as well as certain department stores and other specialty stores, such as
perfumeries. The Company also sells consumer products to U.S. military exchanges and commissaries and
has a licensing group.

Unless the context otherwise requires, all references to the Company mean Revlon, Inc. and its
subsidiaries. Revlon, Inc., as a public holding company, has no business operations of its own and its only
material asset has been all of the outstanding capital stock of Products Corporation. As such, its net (loss)
income has historically consisted predominantly of the net (loss) income of Products Corporation, and in
2004, 2003 and 2002 included approximately $1.2, $1.2 and $5.9, respectively, in expenses incidental to
being a public holding company.

The Company is an indirectly majority-owned subsidiary of MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings Inc.,
formerly known as Mafco Holdings Inc., a corporation wholly owned by Ronald O. Perelman
(‘‘MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings’’ and, together with its afﬁliates, ‘‘MacAndrews & Forbes’’).

The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company after elimination of all
material intercompany balances and transactions. Further, the Company has made a number of estimates
and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of liabilities and the
reporting of revenues and expenses to prepare these ﬁnancial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Certain amounts in the prior year ﬁnancial statements have been reclassiﬁed to conform to the

current year’s presentation.

Cash and Cash Equivalents:

Cash equivalents are primarily investments in high-quality, short-term money market instruments
with original maturities of three months or less and are carried at cost, which approximates fair value.
Cash equivalents were $79.0 and $30.6 as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

In accordance with borrowing arrangements with certain ﬁnancial institutions, the Company is
permitted to borrow against its cash balances. The unrestricted cash available to the Company is the net
of the cash position less amounts supporting these short-term borrowings. The cash balances and related
borrowings are shown gross in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of December 31, 2004 and
2003, the Company had $36.2 and $27.9, respectively, of cash supporting such short-term borrowings. (See
Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

Accounts Receivable:

Accounts receivable represent payments due to the Company for previously recognized net sales,
reduced by an allowance for doubtful accounts for balances, which are estimated to be uncollectible at
December 31, 2004 and 2003. The Company grants credit terms in the normal course of business to its
customers. Trade credit is extended based upon periodically updated evaluations of each customer’s
ability to perform its obligations. The Company does not normally require collateral or other security to
support credit sales. The allowance for doubtful accounts is determined based on historical experience
and ongoing evaluations of the Company’s receivables and evaluations of the risks of payment. Accounts

F-9

receivable balances are recorded against the allowance for doubtful accounts when they are deemed
uncollectible. Recoveries of accounts receivable previously recorded against the allowance are recorded
in the Consolidated Statements of Operations when received. At December 31, 2004 and 2003, the
Company’s three largest customers accounted for an aggregate of approximately 43% and 37% of
outstanding accounts receivable.

Inventories:

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market value. Cost is principally determined by the

ﬁrst-in, ﬁrst-out method.

Property, Plant and Equipment and Other Assets:

Property, plant and equipment is recorded at cost and is depreciated on a straight-line basis over the
estimated useful lives of such assets as follows: land improvements, 20 to 40 years; buildings and
improvements, 5 to 45 years; machinery and equipment, 3 to 17 years; and ofﬁce furniture and ﬁxtures and
capitalized software, 2 to 12 years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over their estimated useful
lives or the terms of the leases, whichever is shorter. Repairs and maintenance are charged to operations
as incurred, and expenditures for additions and improvements are capitalized.

Long-lived assets, including ﬁxed assets and intangibles other than goodwill, are reviewed for
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset
may not be recoverable. If events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an
asset may not be recoverable, the Company estimates the undiscounted future cash ﬂows (excluding
interest) resulting from the use of the asset and its ultimate disposition. If the sum of the undiscounted
cash ﬂows (excluding interest) is less than the carrying value, the Company recognizes an impairment loss,
measured as the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the asset.

Included in other assets are net permanent wall displays amounting to approximately $94.2 and $98.6
as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, which are amortized over 3 to 5 years. Beginning in the
ﬁrst quarter of 2002, the Company decided to roll out new permanent wall displays, replacing existing
permanent wall displays at an accelerated rate. As a result, the useful lives of those permanent wall
displays to be replaced were shortened to their new estimated useful lives, resulting in accelerated
amortization of approximately $11 during 2002. The cost of the new wall displays will be amortized over
a 3-year life. The Company has included in other assets net costs related to the issuance of its debt
instruments amounting to approximately $31.6 and $23.0 as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively,
which are amortized over the terms of the related debt instruments. In addition, the Company has
included in other assets trademarks, net, of $7.8 and $7.5 as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively,
and patents, net, of $3.2 and $3.9 as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Patents and trademarks
are recorded at cost and amortized ratably over approximately 10 to 17 years. Amortization expense for
patents and trademarks for 2004, 2003 and 2002 was $1.8, $1.8 and $2.0, respectively. The Company’s
intangible assets other than goodwill continue to be subject to amortization, which is anticipated to be
approximately $1.6 annually through December 31, 2009.

Intangible Assets Related to Businesses Acquired:

‘‘Business Combinations’’, and Statement No. 142,

Intangible assets related to businesses acquired principally represent goodwill, which represents the
excess purchase price over the fair value of assets acquired. In July 2001, the FASB issued Statement No.
141,
‘‘Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets’’.
Statement 141 requires that the purchase method of accounting be used for all business combinations
initiated after June 30, 2001, as well as all purchase method business combinations completed after June
30, 2001. Statement 141 also speciﬁes criteria that must be met in order for intangible assets acquired in
a purchase method business combination to be recognized and reported apart from goodwill. Statement
142 requires that goodwill and intangible assets with indeﬁnite useful lives no longer be amortized, but
instead tested for impairment at least annually in accordance with the provisions of Statement 142.
Statement 142 requires that intangible assets with ﬁnite useful lives be amortized over their respective
estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values, and reviewed for impairment in accordance with
Statement 144, ‘‘Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets’’.

F-10

The Company adopted the provisions of Statement 141 in July 2001 and Statement 142 effective
January 1, 2002. In connection with the adoption of Statement 142, the Company performed a transitional
goodwill impairment test as required and determined that no goodwill impairment existed at January 1,
2002. The Company performs its annual impairment test of goodwill as of September 30 and performed
the annual test as of September 30, 2004, 2003 and 2002 and concluded that no impairment existed. The
Company operates in one reportable segment, which is also the only reporting unit for purposes of SFAS
No. 142. Since the Company currently only has one reporting unit, all of the goodwill has been assigned
to the enterprise as a whole. The Company compared its estimated fair value as measured by, among other
factors, its market capitalization to its net assets and since the fair value was substantially greater than the
net assets, the Company concluded that there was no impairment of goodwill.

The Company has also evaluated the lives of all of its intangible assets. As a result of this evaluation,
the Company has determined that none of its intangible assets, other than goodwill, have indeﬁnite lives
and that the existing useful lives are appropriate. The amount outstanding for goodwill, net, was $186.1
at December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003. Accumulated amortization aggregated $117.3 at December
31, 2004 and 2003. Amortization of goodwill ceased on January 1, 2002 upon adoption of Statement 142.
Prior to January 1, 2002, the Company amortized goodwill on a straight-line basis over 40 years.

Revenue Recognition:

Sales are recognized when revenue is realized or realizable and has been earned. The Company’s
policy is to recognize revenue when risk of loss and title to the product transfers to the customer. Net sales
is comprised of gross revenues less expected returns, trade discounts and customer allowances, which
include costs associated with off-invoice mark-downs and other price reductions, as well as trade
promotions and coupons. These incentive costs are recognized at the later of the date on which the
Company recognizes the related revenue or the date on which the Company offers the incentive. The
Company allows customers to return their unsold products when they meet certain Company-established
criteria as outlined in the Company’s trade terms. The Company regularly reviews and revises, when
deemed necessary, its estimates of sales returns based primarily upon actual returns, planned product
discontinuances, new product launches and promotional sales, which would permit customers to return
items based upon the Company’s trade terms. The Company records sales returns as a reduction to sales
and cost of sales, and an increase to accrued liabilities and to inventories. Returned products which are
recorded as inventories are valued based upon the amount that the Company expects to realize upon their
subsequent disposition. The physical condition and marketability of the returned products are the major
factors considered by the Company in estimating realizable value. Actual returns, as well as realized
values on returned products, may differ signiﬁcantly, either favorably or unfavorably, from the Company’s
estimates if factors such as product discontinuances, customer inventory levels or competitive conditions
differ from the Company’s estimates and expectations and, in the case of actual returns, if economic
conditions differ signiﬁcantly from the Company’s estimates and expectations. Revenues derived from
licensing arrangements, including any prepayments, are recognized in the period in which they become
due and payable but not before the license term commences.

Cost of sales includes all of the costs to manufacture the Company’s products. For products
manufactured in the Company’s own facilities, such costs include raw materials and supplies, direct labor
and factory overhead. For products manufactured for the Company by third-party contractors, such costs
represent the amounts invoiced by the contractors. Cost of sales also includes the cost of refurbishing
products returned by customers that will be offered for resale and the cost of inventory write-downs
associated with adjustments of held inventories to net realizable value. These costs are reﬂected in the
statement of operations when the product is sold and net sales revenues are recognized or, in the case of
inventory write-downs, when circumstances indicate that the carrying value of inventories is in excess of
its recoverable value. Additionally, cost of sales reﬂects the costs associated with free products. These
incentive costs are recognized on the later of the date that the Company recognizes the related revenue
or the date on which the Company offers the incentive.

SG&A expenses include expenses to advertise the Company’s products, such as television advertising
production costs and air-time costs, print advertising costs, promotional displays and consumer promo-
tions. SG&A also includes the amortization of permanent wall displays and intangible assets, distribution

F-11

costs (such as freight and handling), non-manufacturing overhead, principally personnel and related
expenses, insurance and professional fees.

Income Taxes:

Income taxes are calculated using the asset and liability method in accordance with the provisions of

SFAS No. 109, ‘‘Accounting for Income Taxes.’’

Revlon, Inc. and its U.S. subsidiaries, including Products Corporation, for federal income tax
purposes, were included in the afﬁliated group of which MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings was the
common parent, and Revlon, Inc.’s and its U.S. subsidiaries, including Products Corporation federal
taxable income and loss was through the period ended March 25, 2004 included in such group’s
consolidated tax return ﬁled by MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings. As a result of the Revlon Exchange
Transactions (as hereinafter deﬁned) (See Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements), as of the end
of the day on March 25, 2004, Revlon, Inc. and its U.S. subsidiaries, including Products Corporation, are
no longer included in the MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings consolidated group for federal income tax
purposes.

Pension and Other Post-retirement and Post-employment Beneﬁts:

The Company sponsors pension and other retirement plans in various forms covering substantially
all employees who meet the respective plan’s eligibility requirements. For plans in the U.S., the minimum
amount required pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, as amended, is contributed
annually. Various subsidiaries outside the U.S. have retirement plans under which funds are deposited
with trustees or reserves are provided.

The Company accounts for beneﬁts such as severance, disability and health insurance provided to
former employees prior to their retirement when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the
amount of such liability can be reasonably estimated.

Research and Development:

Research and development expenditures are expensed as incurred. The amounts charged against

earnings in 2004, 2003 and 2002 were $24.0, $25.4 and $23.3, respectively.

Foreign Currency Translation:

Assets and liabilities of foreign operations are generally translated into U.S. dollars at the rates of
exchange in effect at the balance sheet date. Income and expense items are generally translated at the
weighted average exchange rates prevailing during each period presented. Gains and losses resulting from
foreign currency transactions are included in the results of operations. Gains and losses resulting from
translation of ﬁnancial statements of foreign subsidiaries and branches operating in non-hyperinﬂationary
economies are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss until either sale or
upon complete or substantially complete liquidation by the Company of its investment in a foreign entity.
Foreign subsidiaries and branches operating in hyperinﬂationary economies translate non-monetary
assets and liabilities at historical rates and include translation adjustments in the results of operations.

Sale of Subsidiary Stock:

The Company recognizes gains and losses on sales of subsidiary stock in its Consolidated Statements

of Operations.

Basic and Diluted Loss per Common Share and Classes of Stock:

Shares used in basic loss per share are computed using the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding each period. Shares used in diluted loss per share include the dilutive effect of
unvested restricted shares and outstanding stock options using the treasury stock method. Options to
purchase 30,781,700, 7,707,600 and 7,886,100 shares of common stock with weighted average exercise

F-12

prices of $4.66, $10.66 and $12.83, respectively, were outstanding at December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002,
respectively. Additionally, 5,725,000, 1,970,000 and 2,005,000 shares of unvested restricted stock were
outstanding as of December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 respectively. Because the Company incurred losses
in 2004, 2003 and 2002, these shares are excluded from the calculation of diluted loss per common share
as their effect would be antidilutive.

For each period presented, the amount of loss used in the calculation of diluted loss per common

share was the same as the amount of loss used in the calculation of basic loss per common share.

Upon consummation of the 2003 Rights Offering (as hereinafter deﬁned), the fair value, based on the
NYSE closing price of Revlon, Inc.’s Class A Common Stock (as hereinafter deﬁned), was more than the
subscription price. Accordingly, basic and diluted loss per common share for all periods prior to the 2003
Rights Offering have been restated to reﬂect the stock dividend of 1,262,328 shares of Revlon, Inc.’s Class
A Common Stock.

Stock-Based Compensation:

SFAS No. 123, ‘‘Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,’’ (‘‘SFAS No. 123’’) encourages, but
does not require, companies to record compensation cost for stock-based employee compensation plans
at fair value. The Company has chosen to account for stock-based compensation plans using the intrinsic
value method prescribed in APB Opinion No. 25, ‘‘Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,’’ and
related interpretations. Accordingly, compensation cost for stock options issued to employees is measured
as the excess, if any, of the quoted market price of Class A Common Stock at the date of the grant over
the amount an employee must pay to acquire such stock.

The following table illustrates the effect on net loss and net loss per basic and diluted common share
as if the Company had applied the fair value method to its stock-based compensation under the disclosure
provisions of SFAS No. 123 and amended disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 148, ‘‘Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 123’’,
which is more fully described in Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements:

Net loss as reported. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Add: Stock-based employee compensation included in

Year Ended December 31,
2003

2002

2004

$(142.5)

$(153.8)

$(286.5)

reported net loss. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.2

2.2

1.7

Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation

expense determined under fair value based method
for all awards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Pro forma net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(30.3)

$(167.6)

(7.7)

(6.9)

$(159.3)

$(291.7)

Basic and diluted loss per common share:

As reported . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Pro forma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ (0.47)

$ (0.56)

$ (2.47)

$ (2.56)

$ (5.36)

$ (5.46)

The effects of applying SFAS No. 123 in this pro forma disclosure are not necessarily indicative of

future amounts.

Derivative Financial Instruments:

The Company accounts for derivative ﬁnancial instruments in accordance with SFAS No. 133, as
amended by SFAS No. 149. The standard requires the recognition of all derivative instruments on the
balance sheet as either assets or liabilities measured at fair value. Changes in fair value are recognized
immediately in earnings unless the derivatives qualify as hedges of future cash ﬂows. For derivatives
qualifying as hedges of future cash ﬂows, the effective portion of changes in fair value is recorded as a
component of other comprehensive income (loss) and recognized in earnings when the hedged

F-13

transaction is recognized in earnings. Any ineffective portion (representing the extent that the change in
fair value of the hedges does not completely offset the change in the anticipated net payments being
hedged) is recognized in earnings as it occurs. If a derivative instrument designated as a hedge is
terminated, the unrecognized fair value of the hedge previously recorded in accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) is recognized in earnings when the hedged transaction is recognized in
earnings. If the transaction being hedged is terminated, the unrecognized fair value of the Company’s
related hedge instrument is recognized in earnings at that time.

The Company formally designates and documents each ﬁnancial instrument as a hedge of a speciﬁc
underlying exposure, as well as the risk management objectives and strategies for entering into the hedge
transaction upon inception. The Company also formally assesses upon inception and quarterly thereafter
whether the ﬁnancial instruments used in hedging transactions are effective in offsetting changes in the
fair value or cash ﬂows of the hedged items.

The Company uses derivative ﬁnancial instruments, primarily foreign currency forward exchange
contracts, to reduce the effects of ﬂuctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. These contracts, which
have been designated as cash ﬂow hedges, were entered into primarily to hedge anticipated inventory
purchases and certain intercompany payments denominated in foreign currencies, which have maturities
of less than one year. Any unrecognized income (loss) related to these contracts are recorded in the
Statement of Operations primarily in cost of goods sold when the underlying transactions hedged are
realized (e.g., when inventory is sold or intercompany transactions are settled). The Company enters into
these contracts with counterparties that are major ﬁnancial institutions, and accordingly the Company
believes that the risk of counterparty nonperformance is remote. During 2004, 2003 and 2002, net
derivative losses of $1.5, $1.5 and $0.6, respectively, were reclassiﬁed to the Statement of Operations. The
notional amount of the foreign currency forward exchange contracts outstanding at December 31, 2004
and 2003 was $31.5 and $8.3, respectively. The fair value of the foreign currency forward exchange
contracts outstanding at December 31, 2004 and 2003 was $(2.3) and $(0.8), respectively, and is recorded
in Accrued expenses and other in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company had
accumulated net derivative losses of $2.7 in other comprehensive loss as of December 31, 2004, related to
cash ﬂow hedges, all of which will be reclassiﬁed into earnings within 12 months. The amount of the
hedges’ ineffectiveness for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 recorded in the Consolidated
Statements of Operations was not signiﬁcant.

Advertising and Promotion:

Costs associated with advertising and promotion are expensed when incurred. The costs of
promotional displays are expensed in the period in which they are shipped to customers. Television
advertising production costs are expensed the ﬁrst time the advertising takes place. Advertising and
promotion expenses were $225.2, $251.4 and, $210.2 for 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively, and were
included in SG&A expenses in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company
also has various arrangements with customers pursuant to its trade terms to reimburse them for a portion
of their advertising or promotional costs, which provide advertising and promotional beneﬁts to the
Company. Additionally, from time to time the Company may pay fees to customers in order to expand or
maintain shelf space for its products. The costs that the Company incurs for ‘‘cooperative’’ advertising
programs, end cap placement, shelf placement costs and slotting fees are expensed as incurred and are
netted against revenues on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Distribution Costs:

Costs, such as freight and handling costs, associated with distribution are expensed within SG&A

when incurred. Distribution costs were $62.0, $60.4 and $56.5 for 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

F-14

Recent Accounting Pronouncements:

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), ‘‘Share-Based Payment,’’ an
amendment to FASB Statements Nos. 123 and 95 (‘‘SFAS No. 12(R)’’), which replaces SFAS No. 123, and
supercedes APB Opinion No. 25, ‘‘Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.’’ SFAS No. 12(R) requires
all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in
the ﬁnancial statements based on their fair values beginning with the ﬁrst interim or annual period after
June 15, 2005, with early adoption encouraged. The pro forma disclosures previously permitted under
SFAS No. 123 no longer will be an alternative to ﬁnancial statement recognition. The Company is
required to adopt SFAS No. 123(R) in the third quarter of ﬁscal 2005, beginning July 1, 2005. Under SFAS
No. 123(R), the Company must determine the appropriate fair value model to be used for valuing
share-based payments, the amortization method for compensation cost and the transition method to be
used at the date of adoption. The transition methods are either a prospective method or a retroactive
method. Under the retroactive method, prior periods may be restated either as of the beginning of the
year of adoption or for all periods presented. The prospective method requires that compensation
expense be recorded for all unvested stock options and restricted stock at the beginning of the ﬁrst quarter
of adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), while the retroactive methods would record compensation expense for
all unvested stock options and restricted stock beginning with the ﬁrst period restated. The Company is
evaluating the requirements of SFAS No. 123(R) and expects that the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) will
have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations and earnings per share. The
Company is currently evaluating the impact of SFAS 123(R) and has not yet determined the method of
adoption or the effect of adopting SFAS 123(R), and it has not determined whether its adoption will result
in amounts in future periods that are similar to the Company’s current pro forma disclosures under SFAS
No. 123.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, ‘‘Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets — An
Amendment of APB Opinion No. 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions’’ (‘‘SFAS No. 153’’).
SFAS No. 153 eliminates the exception from fair value measurement for nonmonetary exchanges of
similar productive assets in paragraph 21(b) of APB Opinion No. 29, ‘‘Accounting for Nonmonetary
Transactions,’’ and replaces it with an exception for exchanges that do not have commercial substance.
SFAS No. 153 speciﬁes that a nonmonetary exchange has commercial substance if the future cash ﬂows
of the entity are expected to change signiﬁcantly as a result of the exchange. SFAS No. 153 is effective for
the ﬁscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005 and is required to be adopted by the Company beginning
on January 1, 2006. The provisions of this statement will be applied prospectively. The Company is
currently evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 153 and does not expect that the adoption of SFAS No. 153
will have a material impact on its consolidated results of operations and ﬁnancial condition.

In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, ‘‘Inventory Costs — An Amendment of ARB
No. 43, Chapter 4’’ (‘‘SFAS No. 151’’). SFAS No. 151 amends the guidance in ARB No. 43, Chapter 4,
‘‘Inventory Pricing,’’ to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight,
handling costs, and wasted material (spoilage). Among other provisions, the new rule requires that items
such as idle facility expense, excessive spoilage, double freight, and handling cost be recognized as
current-period charges regardless of whether they meet the criterion of ‘‘so abnormal’’ as stated in ARB
No. 43. Additionally, SFAS No. 151 requires that the allocation of ﬁxed production overheads to the costs
of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. SFAS No. 151 is effective for
ﬁscal years beginning after June 15, 2005 and is required to be adopted by the Company beginning on
January 1, 2006. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 151 but does not expect
that it will have a material impact on its consolidated results of operations and ﬁnancial condition.

F-15

2. Restructuring Costs and Other, Net

During 2004 the Company recorded net charges of $5.8 primarily for employee severance and other
personnel beneﬁts for 42 employees in connection with realignments within several departmental
functions and international operations, as to which 32 employees had been terminated as of December 31,
2004. In 2003, the Company recorded separate charges of $5.9 for employee severance and other
personnel beneﬁts for 421 employees in certain International operations, as to which 366 employees had
been terminated as of December 31, 2004.

During 2003 and 2002, the Company recorded a charge of $0.1 and $13.6 related to the 2000
restructuring program, principally for additional employee severance and other personnel beneﬁts and
relocation and other costs related to the consolidation of the Company’s worldwide operations.

During the third quarter of 2000, the Company initiated a new restructuring program in line with the
original restructuring plan developed in late 1998, designed to improve proﬁtability by reducing personnel
and consolidating manufacturing facilities. The 2000 restructuring program focused on the Company’s
plans to close its manufacturing operations in Phoenix, Arizona and Mississauga, Canada and to
consolidate its cosmetics production into its plant in Oxford, North Carolina. The 2000 restructuring
program also includes the remaining obligation for excess leased real estate in the Company’s
headquarters, consolidation costs associated with the Company closing its facility in New Zealand, and the
elimination of several domestic and international executive and operational positions, each of which were
effected to reduce and streamline corporate overhead costs.

F-16

Details of the activity described above during 2004, 2003 and 2002 are as follows:

Balance
Beginning
of Year

Expenses, Net

Cash

Noncash

Utilized, Net

2004

Employee severance and other

personnel beneﬁts:

2000 program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2003 program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2004 program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Leases and equipment write-offs . . . . .

2003

Employee severance and other

personnel beneﬁts:

2000 program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2003 program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Relocation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Leases and equipment write-offs . . . . .
Other obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2002

Employee severance and other

personnel beneﬁts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Relocation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Leases and equipment write-offs . . . . .
Other obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Balance
End
of Year

$ —
3.1
5.1

8.2
2.9

$ (1.8)
(2.4)
(0.8)

(5.0)
0.6

$ —
0.4
—

0.4
0.3

$ (4.4)

$ 0.7

$11.1

$ (5.2)
(0.9)

(6.1)
(0.1)
(1.7)
—

$ —
—

—
—
—
(0.9)

$ 1.8
5.0

6.8
—
2.2
—

$ 1.8
5.0
—

6.8
2.2

$ 9.0

$ 7.0
—

7.0
—
3.9
0.9

$ —
0.1
5.9

6.0
(0.2)

$ 5.8

$ —
5.9

5.9
0.1
—
—

$11.8

$ 6.0

$ (7.9)

$(0.9)

$ 9.0

$15.1
—
7.4
0.3

$22.8

$10.1
0.6
1.7
1.2

$13.6

$(18.2)
(0.6)
(4.9)
(0.6)

$(24.3)

$ —
—
(0.3)
—

$(0.3)

$ 7.0
—
3.9
0.9

$11.8

As of December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, the unpaid balance of the restructuring costs and other, net
for reserves are included in accrued expenses and other and other long-term liabilities in the Company’s
Consolidated Balance Sheets. The remaining balance at December 31, 2004 for employee severance and
other personnel beneﬁts is $8.2, of which $6.7 is expected to be paid by the end of 2005 and the remaining
lease and equipment obligations of $2.9 are expected to be paid by the end of 2008.

3. Dispositions

Described below are the principal sales of certain brands and facilities entered into by Products

Corporation during 2004, 2003 and 2002:

In December 2003, the Company sold a facility located in Canada for approximately $5.2 and leased
it back through the end of 2006. In connection with such disposition, the Company will recognize a pre-tax
and after-tax net gain of approximately $1.7 ratably over the remaining 3-year lease term.

In February 2002, Products Corporation completed the disposition of its Benelux business. As part
of this sale, Products Corporation entered into a long-term distribution agreement with the purchaser
pursuant to which the purchaser distributes the Company’s products in Benelux. The purchase price
consisted principally of the assumption of certain liabilities and a deferred purchase price contingent upon
future results of up to approximately $4.7, which could be received over approximately a seven-year
period. In connection with the disposition, the Company recognized a pre-tax and after-tax net loss of $1.0
in the ﬁrst quarter of 2002.

F-17

Inventories

Raw materials and supplies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Work-in-process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Finished goods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5. Prepaid Expenses and Other

Prepaid expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Note receivable (See Note 11) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6. Property, Plant and Equipment, Net

Land and improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Buildings and improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Machinery and equipment and capitalized leases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ofﬁce furniture and ﬁxtures and capitalized software . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Leasehold improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction-in-progress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Accumulated depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

December 31,

2003

$ 48.3
11.6
82.8

$142.7

December 31,

2003

$22.9
—
11.0

$33.9

2004

$ 48.1
12.2
94.4

$154.7

2004

$35.4
15.9
18.4

$69.7

December 31,

2004

2.3
84.1
144.3
113.6
17.4
7.8

369.5
(250.8)

$ 118.7

2003

2.2
82.8
135.1
109.5
12.5
10.5

352.6
(220.5)

$ 132.1

Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 was $34.0, $33.7 and
$34.5, respectively. The Company has evaluated its management information systems and determined,
among other things, to upgrade its systems. As a result of this decision, certain existing information
systems are being amortized on an accelerated basis. The additional amortization recorded in 2004 and
2003 was $4.3 and $4.6, respectively.

7. Accrued Expenses and Other

Sales returns and allowances. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Advertising and promotional costs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Compensation and related beneﬁts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Taxes, other than federal income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Restructuring costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

F-18

December 31,

2004

$103.3
45.5
56.9
20.9
13.0
7.6
36.0

$283.2

2003

$103.4
52.3
65.7
40.7
9.3
6.4
44.1

$321.9

8. Short-term Borrowings

Products Corporation had outstanding short-term bank borrowings (excluding borrowings under the
2004 Credit Agreement (as hereinafter deﬁned)) aggregating $36.6 and $28.0 at December 31, 2004 and
2003, respectively. The weighted average interest rate on short-term borrowings outstanding at December
31, 2004 and 2003 was 4.2% and 4.0%, respectively. Under these short-term borrowing arrangements, the
Company is permitted to borrow against its cash balances. The cash balances and related borrowings are
shown gross in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, the
Company had $36.2 and $27.9, respectively, of cash supporting such short-term borrowings. Interest rates
on these cash balances at December 31, 2004 and 2003 ranged from 0.5% to 4.5% and 0.6% to 4.7%,
respectively.

9. Long-term Debt

2001 Credit Agreement due 2005 (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2004 Credit Agreement (a):

Term Loan Facility due 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Multi-Currency Facility due 2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
81⁄8% Senior Notes due 2006 (b). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9% Senior Notes due 2006 (c). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2008 (d) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
12% Senior Secured Notes due 2005 (e) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit (f) . . . . . .
12% Senior Unsecured Multiple-Draw Term Loan due 2005 (f) . . . .
8% MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit due 2005 (f) . . . . . . . . . . .
Advances from afﬁliates. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Less current portion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

December 31,

2004

—

2003

$ 217.3

800.0
—
116.2
75.5
327.0
—
—
—
—
—

—
—
249.8
250.0
649.9
356.3
—
106.6
15.5
24.1

1,318.7
(10.5)

$1,308.2

1,869.5
—

$1,869.5

The Company completed two signiﬁcant ﬁnancing transactions during 2004: (i) Revlon, Inc.
exchanged approximately $804 of Product Corporation’s debt, $54.6 of Revlon, Inc. preferred stock and
$9.9 of accrued interest for 299,969,493 shares of Class A Common Stock (the ‘‘Revlon Exchange
Transactions’’) and (ii) Products Corporation entered into the 2004 Credit Agreement, consisting of an
$800 term loan facility and a $160 asset-based multi-currency revolving credit facility, and used the
proceeds to reﬁnance its 2001 Credit Agreement (as hereinafter deﬁned) and to complete a tender offer
and subsequent redemption of all of its 12% Senior Secured Notes due 2005. See discussion below.

(a) On July 9, 2004, Products Corporation entered into a credit agreement (the ‘‘2004 Credit
Agreement’’) to reﬁnance the credit agreement that it had entered into in 2001 and which was to mature
in May 2005 (the ‘‘2001 Credit Agreement’’). Products Corporation entered into the 2004 Credit
Agreement with certain of its subsidiaries as local borrowing subsidiaries, a syndicate of lenders, whose
individual members change from time to time, and Citicorp USA, Inc., as multi-currency administrative
agent, term loan administrative agent and collateral agent. The 2004 Credit Agreement provides up to
$960.0 and consists of an $800.0 term loan facility (the ‘‘Term Loan Facility’’) and a $160.0 asset-based
multi-currency revolving credit facility (the ‘‘Multi-Currency Facility’’), collectively referred to as the
‘‘2004 Credit Facilities’’. (See ‘‘Subsequent Events’’ in Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.)
Products Corporation may request the Multi-Currency Facility to be increased from time to time in an
aggregate principal amount not to exceed $50.0 subject to certain exceptions and subject to the lenders’
agreement. The Multi-Currency Facility is available to: (i) Products Corporation in revolving credit loans
denominated in U.S. dollars, (ii) Products Corporation in swing line loans denominated in U.S. dollars up
to $25.0, (iii) Products Corporation in standby and commercial letters of credit denominated in U.S.

F-19

dollars up to $50.0 and (iv) Products Corporation and certain of its international subsidiaries in revolving
credit loans and bankers’ acceptances denominated in U.S. dollars and other currencies (the ‘‘Local
Loans’’), in each case subject to borrowing base availability that is determined based on the value of
eligible accounts receivable, eligible inventory and eligible real property and equipment from time to
time. If the value of the eligible assets is not sufﬁcient to support the $160.0 borrowing base, Products
Corporation will not have full access to the Multi-Currency Facility. Products Corporation’s ability to
make borrowings under the Multi-Currency Facility is also conditioned upon the satisfaction of certain
conditions precedent and Products Corporation’s compliance with other covenants in the 2004 Credit
Agreement, including a ﬁxed charge coverage ratio that applies when the excess borrowing base is less
than $30.0.

The Multi-Currency Facility will terminate on July 9, 2009 and the loans under the Term Loan
Facility will mature on July 9, 2010; provided that the 2004 Credit Facilities will terminate on October 31,
2005 if Products Corporation’s 81⁄8% Senior Notes are not repaid, redeemed, repurchased or defeased in
full as provided in the 2004 Credit Agreement on or before such date, on July 31, 2006 if Products
Corporation’s 9% Senior Notes are not repaid, redeemed, repurchased or defeased in full on or before
such date, and on October 30, 2007 if Products Corporation’s 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes are not
repaid, redeemed, repurchased or defeased on or before such date such that not more than $25.0 in
aggregate principal amount of the 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes remains outstanding (as each such
series of notes is hereinafter deﬁned). In addition, it would be an event of default under the 2004 Credit
Agreement if Revlon, Inc. failed to undertake an approximately $110.0 equity offering and transfer the
net proceeds of such offering to Products Corporation to reduce Products Corporation’s outstanding
indebtedness by March 31, 2006. (See ‘‘Subsequent Events’’ in Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.)

In March 2005, Revlon, Inc. and MacAndrews & Forbes amended MacAndrews & Forbes’ obligation
under the 2004 Investment Agreement (as hereinafter deﬁned) to backstop a $109.7 equity offering to be
conducted by Revlon, Inc. by accelerating such obligation to October 31, 2005 from March 31, 2006 in the
event that Products Corporation has not as of such date reﬁnanced the 81⁄8% Senior Notes and, therefore,
Revlon, Inc. uses an equity offering to effect such reﬁnancing. In accordance with SFAS No. 6,
‘‘Classiﬁcation of Short-Term Obligations Expected to be Reﬁnanced,’’ $107.7 (being $109.7,
less
estimated future transaction costs) of the 81⁄8% Senior Notes have been classiﬁed as long-term due to such
amendment to the 2004 Investment Agreement. (See ‘‘Subsequent Events’’ in Note 20 to the Consoli-
dated Financial Statements.)

The 2004 Credit Agreement replaced Products Corporation’s 2001 Credit Agreement, which was due
to expire on May 30, 2005. Products Corporation’s EBITDA (as deﬁned in the 2001 Credit Agreement)
for the four consecutive ﬁscal quarters ended December 31, 2003 was less than the minimum of $230
required under the 2001 Credit Agreement for that period and the Company’s leverage ratio was
1.66:1.00, which was in excess of the maximum ratio of 1.10:1.00 permitted under the 2001 Credit
Agreement for that period. Accordingly, Products Corporation sought and on January 28, 2004 secured
waivers of compliance with these covenants for the four quarters ended December 31, 2003. In light of the
Company’s expectation that its plan would affect Products Corporation’s ability to comply with these
covenants during 2004, Products Corporation also secured an amendment to eliminate the EBITDA and
leverage ratio covenants under the 2001 Credit Agreement for the ﬁrst three quarters of 2004 and a waiver
of compliance with such covenants for the four quarters ending December 31, 2004, expiring on January
31, 2005 (the ‘‘January 2004 Bank Amendment’’). In July 2004, the 2001 Credit Agreement was repaid and
reﬁnanced with the 2004 Credit Agreement. In connection with the replacement and repayment of the
2001 Credit Agreement, the Company recorded a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $4.3, which
represents the write-off of deferred ﬁnancing costs.

Products Corporation used the proceeds of borrowings under the 2004 Credit Agreement to repay
in full the $290.5 of outstanding indebtedness (including accrued interest) under Products Corporation’s
2001 Credit Agreement, to purchase and redeem a total of $363 principal amount of the 12% Senior
Secured Notes (as hereinafter deﬁned) for $412.3 (including the applicable premium and accrued
interest), and to pay fees and expenses incurred in connection with the 2004 Credit Agreement, the
purchase and redemption of the 12% Senior Secured Notes and the Revlon Exchange Transactions,

F-20

including the payment of expenses related to a reﬁnancing that Products Corporation launched in May
2004 but did not consummate. The balance of such proceeds is available to Products Corporation for
general corporate purposes.

Borrowings under the Multi-Currency Facility (other than loans in foreign currencies) bear interest
at a rate equal to, at Products Corporation’s option, either (A) the Alternate Base Rate plus 1.50%; or (B)
the Eurodollar Rate plus 2.50%. Loans in foreign currencies bear interest in certain limited circumstances
or if mutually acceptable to Products Corporation and the relevant foreign lenders at the Local Rate, and
otherwise at the Eurocurrency Rate, in each case plus 2.50%. The loans under the Term Loan Facility bear
interest at a rate equal to, at Products Corporation’s option, either (A) the Alternate Base Rate plus
5.00%; or (B) the Eurodollar Rate plus 6.00%. At December 31, 2004, the weighted average rate for
borrowings under the Term Loan Facility was 8.0%. Products Corporation pays to those lenders under the
Multi-Currency Facility a commitment fee of 0.50% of the average daily unused portion of the
Multi-Currency Facility, which fee is payable quarterly in arrears. Under the Multi-Currency Facility,
Products Corporation pays (i) to foreign lenders a fronting fee of 0.25% per annum on the aggregate
principal amount of speciﬁed Local Loans (which fee is retained by the foreign lenders out of the portion
of the Applicable Margin payable to such foreign lender), (ii) to foreign lenders an administrative fee of
0.25% per annum on the aggregate principal amount of speciﬁed Local Loans, (iii) to the multi-currency
lenders a letter of credit commission equal to (a) the Applicable Margin for revolving credit loans that are
Eurodollar Rate loans (adjusted for the term that the letter of credit is outstanding) times (b) the
aggregate undrawn face amount of letters of credit and (iv) to the issuing lender a letter of credit fronting
fee of 0.25% per annum of the aggregate undrawn face amount of letters of credit, which fee is a portion
of the Applicable Margin.

Prior to the termination date of the Term Loan Facility, on October 15, January 15, April 15 and July
15 of each year (commencing October 15, 2005) Products Corporation shall repay $2.0 in aggregate
principal amount of the term loans outstanding under the Term Loan Facility on each respective date. In
addition, the loans under the Term Loan Facility are required to be prepaid with: (i) the net proceeds in
excess of $10.0 each year (subject to limited carryover to subsequent years) received during such year
from sales of Term Loan First Lien Collateral (as deﬁned below) by Products Corporation or any of its
subsidiary guarantors (and in excess of an additional $25.0 in the aggregate during the term of the 2004
Credit Facilities with respect to certain speciﬁed dispositions), subject to certain limited exceptions, (ii)
certain net proceeds from equity offerings by Revlon, Inc. that are not used to redeem, repurchase or
defease the 81⁄8% Senior Notes, the 9% Senior Notes, the 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes or certain other
indebtedness, (iii) the net proceeds from the issuance by Products Corporation or any of its subsidiaries
of certain additional debt and (iv) 50% of Products Corporation’s Excess Cash Flow (as deﬁned in the
2004 Credit Agreement) for any ﬁscal year. (See ‘‘Subsequent Events’’ in Note 20 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements.)

The 2004 Credit Facilities are supported by, among other things, guarantees from Revlon, Inc. and,
subject to certain limited exceptions, the domestic subsidiaries of Products Corporation. The obligations
of Products Corporation under the 2004 Credit Facilities and the obligations under the guarantees are
secured by, subject to certain limited exceptions, substantially all of the assets of Products Corporation
and the subsidiary guarantors, including (i) mortgages on owned real property, including Products
Corporation’s facilities in Oxford, North Carolina and Irvington, New Jersey; (ii) the capital stock of
Products Corporation and the subsidiary guarantors and 66% of the capital stock of Products Corpora-
tion’s and the subsidiary guarantors’ ﬁrst-tier foreign subsidiaries; (iii) intellectual property and other
intangible property of Products Corporation and the subsidiary guarantors; and (iv) inventory, accounts
receivable, equipment, investment property and deposit accounts of Products Corporation and the
subsidiary guarantors. The liens on, among other things, inventory, accounts receivable, deposit accounts,
investment property (other than the capital stock of Products Corporation and its subsidiaries), real
property, equipment, ﬁxtures and certain intangible property related thereto secure the Multi-Currency
Facility on a ﬁrst priority basis and the Term Loan Facility on a second priority basis, while the liens on
the capital stock of Products Corporation and its subsidiaries and intellectual property and certain other
intangible property (the ‘‘Term Loan First Lien Collateral’’) secure the Term Loan Facility on a ﬁrst
priority basis and the Multi-Currency Facility on a second priority basis, all as set forth in an Intercreditor

F-21

and Collateral Agency Agreement by and among Products Corporation and the lenders, which also
provides that the ﬁrst priority liens referred to above may be shared from time to time, subject to certain
limitations, with speciﬁed types of other obligations incurred or guaranteed by Products Corporation,
such as foreign exchange and interest rate hedging obligations and foreign working capital lines, provided
that to the extent such obligations and lines share in the collateral, the borrowing base is reduced by a
reserve established from time to time by the bank agent in respect of such obligations and lines.

The 2004 Credit Agreement contains various restrictive covenants prohibiting Products Corporation
and its subsidiaries from (i) incurring additional indebtedness or guarantees, with certain exceptions, (ii)
making dividend and other payments or loans to Revlon, Inc. or other afﬁliates, with certain exceptions,
including among others, exceptions permitting Products Corporation to pay dividends or make other
payments to Revlon, Inc. to ﬁnance the actual payment by Revlon, Inc. of expenses and obligations
incurred by Revlon, Inc. to enable Revlon, Inc. to, among other things, pay expenses incidental to being
a public holding company, including, among other things, professional fees such as legal and accounting
fees, regulatory fees such as the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) ﬁling fees and
other miscellaneous expenses related to being a public holding company and, subject to certain
circumstances, to ﬁnance the purchase by Revlon, Inc. of its Class A Common Stock in connection with
the delivery of such Class A Common Stock to grantees under the Amended and Restated Revlon, Inc.
Stock Plan (the ‘‘Stock Plan’’), and, subject to certain limitations, to pay dividends or make other
payments to ﬁnance the purchase, redemption or other retirement for value by Revlon, Inc. of stock or
other equity interests or equivalents in Revlon, Inc. held by any current or former director, employee or
consultant in his or her capacity as such, (iii) creating liens or other encumbrances on Products
Corporation’s or its subsidiaries’ assets or revenues, granting negative pledges or selling or transferring
any of Products Corporation’s or its subsidiaries’ assets, all subject to certain limited exceptions, (iv) with
certain exceptions, engaging in merger or acquisition transactions, (v) prepaying indebtedness and
modifying the terms of certain indebtedness and speciﬁed material contractual obligations, subject to
certain exceptions (including, without limitation, prepaying one or more of the 81⁄8% Notes, 9% Notes or
85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes with the proceeds of certain equity offerings, including the approxi-
mately $110 equity offering to be conducted by Revlon, Inc. prior to March 31, 2006 and to be
back-stopped by MacAndrews & Forbes up to such amount, or with certain permitted reﬁnancing
indebtedness), (vi) making investments, subject to certain exceptions, and (vii) entering into transactions
with afﬁliates of Products Corporation other than upon terms no less favorable to Products Corporation
or its subsidiaries than it would obtain in an arms’ length transaction. In addition to the foregoing, the
2004 Credit Agreement contains ﬁnancial covenants limiting the senior secured leverage ratio of Products
Corporation (the ratio of Products Corporation’s Senior Secured Debt to EBITDA, as each such term is
deﬁned in the 2004 Credit Agreement) to 5.50 to 1.00 for the four consecutive quarters ending during the
period from December 31, 2004 to September 30, 2005; 5.00 to 1.00 for the four consecutive quarters
ending during the period from December 31, 2005 to December 31, 2006; and 4.50 to 1.00 for the four
consecutive quarters ending March 31, 2007 and each subsequent quarter until the maturity date of the
2004 Credit Agreement, and, under circumstances when the excess borrowing base under the Multi-
Currency Facility is less than $30.0 for a period of 30 consecutive days or more, requiring Products
Corporation to maintain a consolidated ﬁxed charge coverage ratio (the ratio of EBITDA minus Capital
Expenditures to Cash Interest Expense for such period, as each such term is deﬁned in the 2004 Credit
Agreement) of 1.00 to 1.00. The Company was in compliance with these covenants at December 31, 2004.
(See ‘‘Subsequent Events’’ in Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.)

The events of default under the 2004 Credit Agreement include customary events of default for such
types of agreements, including (i) nonpayment of any principal, interest or other fees when due, subject
in the case of interest and fees to a grace period; (ii) non-compliance with the covenants in the 2004 Credit
Agreement or the ancillary security documents, subject in certain instances to grace periods; (iii) the
institution of any bankruptcy, insolvency or similar proceedings by or against Products Corporation, any
of Products Corporation’s subsidiaries or Revlon, Inc., subject in certain instances to grace periods;
(iv) default by Revlon, Inc., or any of its subsidiaries (y) in the payment of certain indebtedness when due
(whether at maturity or by acceleration) in excess of $5.0 in aggregate principal amount or (z) in the
observance or performance of any other agreement or condition relating to such debt, provided that the

F-22

amount of debt involved is in excess of $5.0 in aggregate principal amount, or the occurrence of any other
event, the effect of which default or other event is to cause or permit the holders of such debt to cause
the acceleration of payment of such debt; (v) the failure by Products Corporation, certain of Products
Corporation’s subsidiaries or Revlon, Inc., to pay certain material judgments; (vi) a change of control such
that (w) Revlon, Inc. shall cease to be the beneﬁcial and record owner of 100% of Products Corporation’s
capital stock, (x) Ronald O. Perelman (or his estate, heirs, executors, administrator or other personal
representative) and his or their controlled afﬁliates shall cease to ‘‘control’’ Products Corporation, and
any other person or group or persons owns more than 25% of the total voting power of Revlon, Inc.,
(y) any person or group of persons other than Ronald O. Perelman (or his estate, heirs, executors,
administrator or other personal representative) and his or their controlled afﬁliates shall ‘‘control’’
Products Corporation or (z) the current directors serving on Products Corporation’s Board of Directors
(or other directors nominated by at least 662⁄3% of such continuing directors) shall cease to be a majority
of the directors; (vii) the failure by Revlon, Inc. (y) to conduct an approximately $110.0 million equity
offering and to transfer the net proceeds of such offering to Products Corporation to reduce its
outstanding indebtedness by March 31, 2006 or (z) to contribute to Products Corporation all of the net
proceeds it receives from any other sale of its equity securities or Products Corporation’s capital stock,
subject to certain limited exceptions; (viii) the failure of any of Products Corporation’s, its subsidiaries’ or
Revlon, Inc.’s representations or warranties in any of the documents entered into in connection with the
2004 Credit Agreement to be correct, true and not misleading in all material respects when made or
conﬁrmed; (ix) the conduct by Revlon, Inc., of any meaningful business activities other than those that are
customary for a publicly traded holding company which is not itself an operating company, including the
ownership of meaningful assets (other than Products Corporation’s capital stock) or the incurrence of
debt, in each case subject to limited exceptions; (x) MacAndrews & Forbes’ failure to fund any binding
commitment under the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit; and (xi) the failure of
certain Products Corporation’s afﬁliates which hold Products Corporation’s or its subsidiaries’ indebted-
ness to be party to a valid and enforceable agreement prohibiting such afﬁliate from demanding or
retaining payments in respect of such indebtedness.

(b) The 81⁄8% Senior Notes due 2006 (the ‘‘81⁄8% Senior Notes’’) are senior unsecured obligations of
Products Corporation and rank equally in right of payment with all existing and future senior debt of
Products Corporation, including the 9% Senior Notes, the indebtedness under the 2004 Credit Agreement
and the indebtedness under the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit (as hereinafter
deﬁned) and are senior to the 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes and to all future subordinated
indebtedness of Products Corporation. The 81⁄8% Senior Notes are effectively subordinated to the
outstanding indebtedness and other liabilities of Products Corporation’s subsidiaries. Interest is payable
on February 1 and August 1. (See ‘‘Subsequent Events’’ in Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.)

The 81⁄8% Senior Notes are due February 2006 and may be redeemed at the option of Products
Corporation in whole or in part at any time on or after February 1, 2002 at the redemption prices set forth
in the 81⁄8% Senior Notes indenture, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of redemption.
The 2004 Credit Agreement requires that Products Corporation redeem, repurchase or defease in full on
or before October 31, 2005 the 81⁄8% Senior Notes. Otherwise, the 2004 Credit Facilities will terminate and
all amounts outstanding under the 2004 Credit Facilities will become due on such date. In 2004,
approximately $133.8 principal amount of the 81⁄8% Senior Notes were exchanged for Class A Common
Stock in the Revlon Exchange Transactions, as discussed below. (See ‘‘Subsequent Events’’ in Note 20 to
the Consolidated Financial Statements.)

Upon a change of control, as deﬁned in the 81⁄8% Senior Notes indenture, Products Corporation will
have the option to redeem the 81⁄8% Senior Notes in whole at a redemption price equal to the principal
amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, thereon to the date of redemption, plus the
applicable premium, as deﬁned in the 81⁄8% Senior Notes indenture, and, subject to certain conditions,
each holder of the 81⁄8% Senior Notes will have the right to require Products Corporation to repurchase
all or a portion of such holder’s 81⁄8% Senior Notes at a price equal to 101% of the principal amount
thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, thereon to the date of repurchase.

F-23

The 81⁄8% Senior Notes indenture contains covenants that, among other things, limit (i) the issuance
of additional debt and redeemable stock by Products Corporation, (ii) the incurrence of liens, (iii) the
issuance of debt and preferred stock by Products Corporation’s subsidiaries, (iv) the payment of dividends
on capital stock of Products Corporation and its subsidiaries and the redemption of capital stock of
Products Corporation and certain subordinated obligations, (v) the sale of assets and subsidiary stock, (vi)
transactions with afﬁliates and (vii) consolidations, mergers and transfers of all or substantially all
Products Corporation’s assets. The 81⁄8% Senior Notes indenture also prohibits certain restrictions on
distributions from subsidiaries. All of these limitations and prohibitions, however, are subject to a number
of important qualiﬁcations. (See ‘‘Subsequent Events’’
in Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.)

(c) The 9% Senior Notes due 2006 (the ‘‘9% Senior Notes’’) are senior unsecured obligations of
Products Corporation and rank equally in right of payment with all existing and future senior debt of
including the 81⁄8% Senior Notes, the indebtedness under the 2004 Credit
Products Corporation,
Agreement and the indebtedness under the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit and
are senior to the 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes and to all future subordinated indebtedness of Products
Corporation. The 9% Senior Notes are effectively subordinated to outstanding indebtedness and other
liabilities of Products Corporation’s subsidiaries. Interest is payable on May 1 and November 1. (See
‘‘Subsequent Events’’ in Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.)

The 9% Senior Notes are due November 2006 and may be redeemed at the option of Products
Corporation in whole or in part at any time on or after November 1, 2002 at the redemption prices set
forth in the 9% Senior Notes indenture plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of redemption.
The 2004 Credit Agreement requires that Products Corporation redeem, repurchase or defease in full on
or before July 31, 2006 the 9% Senior Notes. Otherwise, the 2004 Credit Facilities will terminate and all
amounts outstanding under the 2004 Credit Facilities will become due on such date. In 2004,
approximately $174.5 principal amount of the 9% Senior Notes were exchanged for Class A Common
Stock in the Revlon Exchange Transactions, as discussed below. (See ‘‘Subsequent Events’’ in Note 20 to
the Consolidated Financial Statements.)

Upon a change of control, as deﬁned in the 9% Senior Notes indenture, Products Corporation will
have the option to redeem the 9% Senior Notes in whole at a redemption price equal to the principal
amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, thereon to the date of redemption, plus the
applicable premium, as deﬁned in the 9% Senior Notes indenture, and, subject to certain conditions, each
holder of the 9% Senior Notes will have the right to require Products Corporation to repurchase all or a
portion of such holder’s 9% Senior Notes at a price equal to 101% of the principal amount thereof, plus
accrued and unpaid interest, if any, thereon to the date of repurchase.

The 9% Senior Notes indenture contains covenants that, among other things, limit (i) the issuance of
additional debt and redeemable stock by Products Corporation, (ii) the incurrence of liens, (iii) the
issuance of debt and preferred stock by Products Corporation’s subsidiaries, (iv) the payment of dividends
on capital stock of Products Corporation and its subsidiaries and the redemption of capital stock of
Products Corporation and certain subordinated obligations, (v) the sale of assets and subsidiary stock, (vi)
transactions with afﬁliates and (vii) consolidations, mergers and transfers of all or substantially all
Products Corporation’s assets. The 9% Senior Notes indenture also prohibits certain restrictions on
distributions from subsidiaries. All of these limitations and prohibitions, however, are subject to a number
in Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial
of important qualiﬁcations. (See ‘‘Subsequent Events’’
Statements.)

(d) The 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2008 (the ‘‘85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes’’) are
general unsecured obligations of Products Corporation and are (i) subordinate in right of payment to all
existing and future senior debt of Products Corporation, including the 9% Senior Notes, the 81⁄8% Senior
Notes, the indebtedness under the 2004 Credit Agreement and the indebtedness under the 2004
Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit, (ii) rank equally in right of payment with all future
senior subordinated debt, if any, of Products Corporation and (iii) senior in right of payment to all future
subordinated debt, if any, of Products Corporation. The 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes are effectively
subordinated to the outstanding indebtedness and other liabilities of Products Corporation’s subsidiaries.
Interest is payable on February 1 and August 1.

F-24

The 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes are due February 2008 and may be redeemed at the option of
Products Corporation in whole or from time to time in part at any time on or after February 1, 2003 at
the redemption prices set forth in the 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes indenture, plus accrued and
unpaid interest, if any, to the date of redemption. The 2004 Credit Agreement requires that Products
Corporation redeem, repurchase or defease on or before October 30, 2007 the 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated
Notes such that not more than $25.0 in aggregate principal amount of the 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated
Notes remains outstanding. Otherwise, the 2004 Credit Facilities will terminate and all amounts
outstanding under the 2004 Credit Facilities will become due on such date. In 2004, approximately $322.9
principal amount of the 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes were exchanged for Class A Common Stock in
the Revlon Exchange Transactions, as discussed below.

Upon a Change of Control, as deﬁned in the 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes indenture, Products
Corporation will have the option to redeem the 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes in whole at a redemption
price equal to the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, thereon to the date
of redemption, plus the applicable premium, as deﬁned in the 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes indenture,
and, subject to certain conditions, each holder of the 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes will have the right
to require Products Corporation to repurchase all or a portion of such holder’s 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated
Notes at a price equal to 101% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any,
thereon to the date of repurchase.

The 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes indenture contains covenants that, among other things, limit (i)
the issuance of additional debt and redeemable stock by Products Corporation, (ii) the incurrence of liens,
(iii) the issuance of debt and preferred stock by Products Corporation’s subsidiaries, (iv) the payment of
dividends on capital stock of Products Corporation and its subsidiaries and the redemption of capital
stock of Products Corporation, (v) the sale of assets and subsidiary stock, (vi) transactions with afﬁliates,
(vii) consolidations, mergers and transfers of all or substantially all of Products Corporation’s assets and
(viii) the issuance of additional subordinated debt that is senior in right of payment to the 85⁄8% Senior
Subordinated Notes. The 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes indenture also prohibits certain restrictions on
distributions from subsidiaries. All of these limitations and prohibitions, however, are subject to a number
of important qualiﬁcations.

(e) The 12% Senior Secured Notes due 2005 (the ‘‘12% Senior Secured Notes’’) were issued by
Products Corporation pursuant to an indenture, dated as of November 26, 2001 among Products
Corporation, the guarantors party thereto, including Revlon, Inc. as parent guarantor, and Wilmington
Trust Company, as trustee. The 12% Senior Secured Notes were supported by guarantees from Revlon,
Inc. and, subject to certain limited exceptions, Products Corporation’s domestic subsidiaries.

In July and August 2004, Products Corporation purchased and redeemed all of the $363.0 aggregate
principal amount outstanding of its 12% Senior Secured Notes for a purchase price of approximately
$412.3 (including the applicable premium and accrued interest). In connection with the tender for and
redemption of the 12% Senior Secured Notes, the Company recorded a loss on early extinguishment of
debt of $54.4, which represents the premium, fees, expenses and the write-off of deferred ﬁnancing costs.

The indentures for the 81⁄8% Senior Notes, the 9% Senior Notes and the 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated
Notes contain customary events of default for debt instruments of such type and each include a cross
acceleration provision which provides that it shall be an event of default under each such indenture if any
debt (as deﬁned in each such indenture) of Products Corporation or any of its signiﬁcant subsidiaries (as
deﬁned in each such indenture) is not paid within any applicable grace period after ﬁnal maturity or is
accelerated by the holders of such debt because of a default and the total principal amount of the portion
of such debt that is unpaid or accelerated exceeds $25.0 and such default continues for 10 days after notice
from the trustee under each such indenture. If any such event of default occurs, the trustee under each
such indenture or the holders of at least 25% in principal amount of the outstanding notes under each such
indenture may declare all such notes to be due and payable immediately, provided that the holders of a
majority in aggregate principal amount of the outstanding notes under each such indenture may, by notice
to the trustee, waive any such default or event of default and its consequences under each such indenture.
(See ‘‘Subsequent Events’’ in Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.)

F-25

(f) During 2003, MacAndrews & Forbes Inc. made available a $100 term loan to Products
Corporation (the ‘‘MacAndrews & Forbes $100 million term loan’’) with a ﬁnal maturity date of
December 1, 2005 and interest on such loan of 12.0% was not payable in cash, but accrued and was added
to the principal amount each quarter and was to be paid in full at ﬁnal maturity. Additionally,
MacAndrews & Forbes also provided Products Corporation with an additional $40 line of credit during
2003, which amount was originally to increase to $65 on January 1, 2004 (the ‘‘MacAndrews & Forbes $65
million line of credit’’ with the MacAndrews & Forbes $100 million term loan and the MacAndrews &
Forbes $65 million line of credit sometimes being referred to as the ‘‘2003 MacAndrews & Forbes Loans’’)
and which was originally to be available to Products Corporation through December 31, 2004 provided
that the MacAndrews & Forbes $100 million term loan was fully drawn and the Company had
consummated a $50 equity rights offering (the ‘‘2003 Rights Offering’’ pursuant to its February 2003
investment agreement with MacAndrews & Forbes Inc. (the ‘‘2003 Investment Agreement’’). However,
in connection with the January 2004 amendment to the 2001 Credit Agreement, Products Corporation
and MacAndrews & Forbes agreed to extend the maturity of the MacAndrews & Forbes $65 million line
of credit to June 30, 2005 and subject to the availability of funds under such line of credit to the condition
that an aggregate principal amount of $100 be drawn under the 2004 MacAndrews & Forbes $125 million
term loan (as hereinafter deﬁned). In December 2003, Revlon, Inc. announced that its Board of Directors
approved two loans from MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, one to provide up to $100 (the ‘‘2004
MacAndrews & Forbes Loan’’), if needed, to enable the Company to continue to implement and reﬁne
its plan, and the other to provide an additional $25 (the ‘‘$25 million MacAndrews & Forbes Loan’’) to
be used for general corporate purposes. The 2004 MacAndrews & Forbes Loan and $25 million
MacAndrews & Forbes Loan were consolidated into one term loan agreement (hereinafter referred to as
the ‘‘2004 MacAndrews & Forbes $125 million term loan’’). The 2004 MacAndrews & Forbes $125 million
term loan was a senior unsecured multiple-draw term loan at an interest rate of 12% per annum and which
was on substantially the same terms as the MacAndrews & Forbes $100 million term loan provided by
MacAndrews & Forbes earlier in 2003, including that interest on such loans was not to be payable in cash,
but was to accrue and be added to the principal amount each quarter and was to be paid in full at ﬁnal
maturity on December 1, 2005, provided that the ﬁnal $25 million of such loan could have been repaid at
the Company’s option prior to December 1, 2005. On March 25, 2004, principal and accrued interest of
$109.7 under the MacAndrews & Forbes $100 million term loan and $38.9 under the 2004 MacAndrews
& Forbes $125 million term loan were converted into shares of Class A Common Stock in connection with
the Revlon Exchange Transactions. See discussion below.

On July 9, 2004, Products Corporation and MacAndrews & Forbes entered into an agreement, which
effective as of August 10, 2004 amended, restated and consolidated the facilities for the MacAndrews &
Forbes $65 million line of credit and the 2004 MacAndrews & Forbes $125 million term loan (the latter
as to which after the Revlon Exchange Transactions the total term loan availability was $87) into a single
consolidated line of credit with availability of $152 (the ‘‘2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line
of Credit’’), the commitment under which reduces to $87 as of July 1, 2005 and terminates on December
1, 2005. Loans are available under the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit if (i) the
Multi-Currency Facility under the 2004 Credit Agreement has been substantially drawn (after taking into
account anticipated needs for Local Loans and letters of credit), (ii) such borrowing is necessary to cause
the excess borrowing base under the Multi-Currency Facility to remain greater than $30, (iii) additional
revolving loans are not available under the Multi-Currency Facility or (iv) such borrowing is reasonably
necessary to prevent or to cure a default or event of default under the 2004 Credit Agreement. Loans
under the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit bear interest (which is not payable
in cash but is capitalized quarterly in arrears) at a rate per annum equal to the lesser of (a) 12.0% and (b)
0.25% less than the rate payable from time to time on Eurodollar loans under the Term Loan Facility
under the 2004 Credit Agreement, which on December 31, 2004 was 8.0%, provided, that at any time that
the Eurodollar Base Rate under the 2004 Credit Agreement is equal to or greater than 3.0%, the
applicable rate to loans under the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit will be equal
to the lesser of (x) 12.0% and (y) 5.25% over the Eurodollar Base Rate then in effect.

During 1992, Revlon Holdings (as hereinafter deﬁned) made an advance of $25.0 to Products
Corporation, evidenced by subordinated noninterest-bearing demand notes. The notes were subsequently

F-26

adjusted by offsets and additional amounts loaned by Revlon Holdings to Products Corporation. In 2004,
the balance of $24.1 was exchanged for Class A Common Stock in the Revlon Exchange Transactions as
discussed below.

The aggregate amounts of contractual long-term debt maturities at December 31, 2004, in the years

2005 through 2009 and thereafter are $10.5, $191.2, $335.0, $8.0, $8.0 and $766.0, respectively.

Revlon Exchange Transactions

On February 11, 2004, Revlon, Inc. entered into agreements with Fidelity Management & Research
Co. (‘‘Fidelity’’) and MacAndrews & Forbes conﬁrming that if Revlon, Inc. were to commence an offer
to exchange or convert certain indebtedness of Products Corporation and Revlon, Inc. preferred stock for
Class A Common Stock, Fidelity and MacAndrews & Forbes would tender, or cause to be tendered,
certain indebtedness in the exchange. On February 12, 2004, Revlon, Inc. launched debt-for-equity
exchange offers to exchange any and all of Products Corporation’s outstanding 81⁄8% Senior Notes due
2006, 9% Senior Notes due 2006, and 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2008 (collectively, the ‘‘Revlon
Exchange Notes’’) for shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock or, under certain conditions, cash.

Fidelity and MacAndrews & Forbes agreed to tender Product Corporation’s outstanding notes at a
ratio of 400 shares of Class A Common Stock for each one thousand dollars principal of 81⁄8% Senior
Notes or 9% Senior Notes and 300 shares of Class A Common Stock for each one thousand dollars
principal of 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes tendered for exchange. The agreements allowed Fidelity the
right to elect to receive cash or additional shares of Class A Common Stock for accrued interest on the
notes tendered while MacAndrews & Forbes received Class A Common Stock for the accrued interest.
Other holders were offered the opportunity to exchange their Revlon Exchange Notes for (i) shares of
Class A Common Stock at the same exchange ratios or, under certain conditions, (ii) cash up to a
maximum of $150 aggregate principal of tendered Revlon Exchange Notes, subject to proration, at $830
per one thousand dollars principal for the 81⁄8% Senior Notes, $800 per one thousand dollars principal for
the 9% Senior Notes and $620 per $1,000 principal for the 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes. Accrued
interest was paid in cash or additional shares of Class A Common Stock, at the holder’s option.

An aggregate of approximately $631.2 in outstanding notes, consisting of approximately $133.8 of
81⁄8% Senior Notes, approximately $174.5 of the 9% Senior Notes and approximately $322.9 of the 85⁄8%
Senior Subordinated Notes were exchanged, along with the related accrued interest, for an aggregate of
approximately 224.1 million shares of Class A Common Stock. These amounts included approximately
$1.0 of 9% Senior Notes and $286.7 of 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes tendered by MacAndrews &
Forbes and related entities and approximately $85.9 of 9% Senior Notes, approximately $77.8 of 81⁄8%
Senior Notes and approximately $32.1 of 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes tendered by funds and
accounts managed by Fidelity. No cash was paid for any principal amount of notes exchanged.

MacAndrews & Forbes also received Class A Common Stock for amounts outstanding as of the
March 25, 2004 closing date under the MacAndrews & Forbes $100 million term loan (approximately
$109.7, including accrued interest), the 2004 MacAndrews & Forbes $125 million term loan (approxi-
mately $38.9, including accrued interest) and approximately $24.1 in subordinated promissory notes.
Amounts under the MacAndrews & Forbes $100 million term loan and 2004 MacAndrews & Forbes $125
million term loan were exchanged at 400 shares per thousand dollars exchanged for approximately 43.9
million shares and 15.6 million shares, respectively. Amounts under the subordinated promissory notes
were exchanged at 300 shares per thousand dollars exchanged for approximately 7.2 million shares.
Portions of the 2004 MacAndrews & Forbes $125 million term loan and the MacAndrews & Forbes $65
million line of credit not exchanged remained available to Products Corporation, subject to a borrowing
limitation, which was subsequently eliminated.

REV Holdings LLC (‘‘REV Holdings’’), a wholly owned indirect subsidiary of MacAndrews &
Forbes Holdings, owned all 546 shares of Revlon, Inc.’s outstanding Series A preferred stock with a par
value of $0.01 per share and a liquidation preference of $54.6 (‘‘Revlon, Inc. Series A Preferred Stock’’)
and all 4,333 shares of Revlon, Inc.’s outstanding Series B convertible preferred stock, with a par value
of $0.01 per share and which were convertible into 433,333 shares of Class A Common Stock (‘‘Revlon,
Inc. Series B Preferred Stock’’). As part of the Revlon Exchange Transactions, REV Holdings exchanged

F-27

each $1,000 of liquidation preference of Revlon, Inc. Series A Preferred Stock for 160 shares of Class A
Common Stock for an aggregate of approximately 8.7 million shares of Class A Common Stock and
converted its shares of Revlon, Inc. Series B Preferred Stock into an aggregate of 433,333 shares of Class
A Common Stock.

The consummation of the Revlon Exchange Transactions on March 25, 2004 resulted in (i) the
reduction of debt, preferred stock and accrued interest of approximately $804 (as of such date), $54.6 and
$9.9, respectively, resulting from the issuance of 299,969,493 shares of Class A Common Stock and (ii)
resulted in a decrease to capital deﬁciency of $879.3, including $79.9 as a result of the exchange or
conversion of debt and preferred stock by MacAndrews & Forbes, calculated as the difference between
the market value on March 25, 2004 of the Class A Common Stock issued and the principal amount of
debt and preferred stock exchanged or converted, together with accrued interest. Additionally, the
Company recognized a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $32.0 for the write-off of unamortized debt
issuance costs and debt discount, estimated fees and expenses and the difference between the market
value on March 25, 2004 of the shares of Class A Common Stock issued and the principal amount of debt
exchanged by third parties (other than by MacAndrews & Forbes), together with accrued interest, of
$15.5.

On February 20, 2004, Revlon, Inc. and Fidelity also entered into a stockholders agreement (the
‘‘Stockholders Agreement’’) pursuant to which, among other things, (i) Revlon, Inc. agreed to continue
to maintain a majority of independent directors (as deﬁned by New York Stock Exchange listing
standards) on its Board of Directors, as it currently does; and (ii) Revlon, Inc. would establish and
maintain a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of Directors, which it formed
in March 2004; and (iii) Revlon, Inc. agreed to certain restrictions with respect to Revlon, Inc.’s
conducting any business or entering into any transactions or series of related transactions with any of its
afﬁliates, any holders of 10% or more of the outstanding voting stock or any afﬁliates of such holders (in
each case, other than its subsidiaries). This Stockholders Agreement will terminate when Fidelity ceases
to be the beneﬁcial holder of at least 5% of Revlon, Inc.’s outstanding voting stock.

On February 20, 2004, Revlon, Inc. and MacAndrews & Forbes also entered into an investment
agreement (the ‘‘2004 Investment Agreement’’) pursuant to which MacAndrews and Forbes committed
to assisting the Company with its goal of reducing Products Corporation’s indebtedness by an additional
$200 in the aggregate by the end of 2004 and further by an additional $100 in the aggregate by March 2006.
Pursuant to the 2004 Investment Agreement, MacAndrews & Forbes agreed, among other things, (i) to
the extent that a minimum of $150 aggregate principal amount of notes were not tendered in the Revlon
Exchange Transaction, to back-stop the exchange offers by subscribing for additional shares of Revlon,
Inc.’s Class A Common Stock at a purchase price of $2.50 per share, to the extent of any shortfall, the
proceeds of which would be used to reduce Products Corporation’s outstanding indebtedness; (ii) to
back-stop a rights offering in an amount necessary to meet the $200 aggregate debt reduction target by
December 31, 2004, not to exceed $50 since at least $150 of debt reduction in the aggregate was ensured
as a result of the MacAndrews & Forbes back-stop obligations discussed in (i) above; and (iii) to
back-stop a rights offering in an amount necessary to meet the $300 aggregate debt reduction target by
March 31, 2006, not to exceed $100 since at least $200 of debt reduction in the aggregate is ensured as a
result of the back-stop obligations discussed in (i) and (ii) above (such equity offerings together with the
Revlon Exchange Transactions are the ‘‘Debt Reduction Transactions’’). In connection with the closing of
the Revlon Exchange Transactions on March 25, 2004, MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings executed a
joinder agreement to the Revlon, Inc. registration rights agreement pursuant to which all Class A
Common Stock acquired by MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings will be deemed to be registrable securities.

In connection with consummating the Revlon Exchange Transactions, Revlon, Inc.’s plan to launch
a rights offering and use the proceeds to reduce Products Corporation’s debt by a further $50 by year-end
2004 was reduced to $9.7, as a result of $190.3 of notes having been exchanged in excess of the notes
committed to be exchanged by MacAndrews & Forbes and Fidelity under their respective support
agreements. This $190.3 more than satisﬁed Revlon, Inc.’s plan to reduce debt by $150 in connection with
the Revlon Exchange Transactions pursuant to the support agreements with MacAndrews & Forbes and
Fidelity. The $40.3 difference satisﬁed all but $9.7 of the Company’s plan to reduce debt (in addition to
the Revlon Exchange Notes) by a further $50 by year-end 2004. Because the costs and expenses, as well

F-28

as the use of organizational resources, associated with a $9.7 rights offering would have been unduly
disproportionate, Revlon, Inc.’s support and investment agreements with MacAndrews & Forbes and
Fidelity relating to the Company’s debt reduction plan were amended to enable Revlon, Inc. to satisfy the
remaining $9.7 of debt reduction as part of the ﬁnal stage of the Company’s debt reduction plan.
Therefore, Revlon, Inc. now intends to conduct an equity offering of approximately $110 by the end of
March 2006 and to use such proceeds to reduce Products Corporation’s debt. Consistent with agreements
between MacAndrews & Forbes and Revlon, Inc. entered into contemporaneously with the agreements
relating to the Revlon Exchange Transactions, MacAndrews & Forbes agreed to back-stop the $110
equity offering. Under the 2004 Credit Agreement, unless Products Corporation reﬁnances its 81⁄8%
Senior Notes, with $116.1 aggregate principal amount outstanding, by October 31, 2005, the 2004 Credit
Agreement would terminate on October 31, 2005. In March 2005, Revlon, Inc. and MacAndrews &
Forbes Holdings amended the 2004 Investment Agreement by accelerating MacAndrews & Forbes
Holdings’ obligation to backstop a $109.7 equity offering to be conducted by Revlon, Inc. to October 31,
2005 from March 31, 2006 in the event that Products Corporation has not as of such date reﬁnanced the
81⁄8% Senior Notes and, therefore, Revlon, Inc. uses an equity offering to effect such reﬁnancing. (See
‘‘Subsequent Events’’ discussion in Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.)

The Company expects that operating revenues, cash on hand, and funds available for borrowing
under the 2004 Credit Agreement, the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit and
other permitted lines of credit will be sufﬁcient to enable the Company to cover its operating expenses for
2005, including cash requirements in connection with the Company’s operations, the continued imple-
mentation of, and reﬁnement to, the Company’s plan, cash requirements in connection with the
Company’s restructuring programs referred to above, the Company’s debt service requirements and
regularly scheduled pension contributions. However, there can be no assurance that such funds will be
sufﬁcient to meet the Company’s cash requirements on a consolidated basis. If the Company’s anticipated
level of revenue growth is not achieved because, for example, of decreased consumer spending in
response to weak economic conditions or weakness in the mass market cosmetics category, adverse
changes in currency, increased competition from the Company’s competitors, changes in consumer
purchasing habits, including with respect to shopping channels, or the Company’s marketing plans are not
as successful as anticipated, or if the Company’s expenses associated with the continued implementation
of, and reﬁnement to, the Company’s plan exceed the anticipated level of expenses, the Company’s
current sources of funds may be insufﬁcient to meet the Company’s cash requirements.

The U.S. mass-market color cosmetics category during 2004 and 2003 was softer than the Company
expected, declining by 2.5% in 2004 and 1.9% in 2003. Despite this softness in the U.S. mass-market color
cosmetics category, based upon the Company’s belief that its continued implementation of its plan is
proving effective, the Company intends to continue to support its plan. Additionally, in the event of a
decrease in demand for Products Corporation’s products, reduced sales, lack of increases in demand and
sales, changes in consumer purchasing habits, including with respect to shopping channels, and/or
increased returns or expenses associated with the continued implementation of, and reﬁnement to, the
Company’s plan, exceed the Company’s expectations, any such development, if signiﬁcant, could reduce
Products Corporation’s operating proﬁts and could adversely affect Products Corporation’s ability to
comply with certain ﬁnancial covenants under the 2004 Credit Agreement and in such event the Company
could be required to take measures, including reducing discretionary spending.

If the Company is unable to satisfy its cash requirements from the sources identiﬁed above or comply
with its debt covenants, the Company could be required to adopt one or more alternatives, such as
delaying the implementation of or revising aspects of its plan, reducing or delaying purchases of wall
displays or advertising or promotional expenses, reducing or delaying capital spending, delaying, reducing
or revising restructuring programs, restructuring indebtedness, selling assets or operations, seeking
additional capital contributions or loans from MacAndrews & Forbes, Revlon, Inc., the Company’s other
afﬁliates or third parties, selling additional equity or debt securities of Revlon, Inc. (or debt securities of
Products Corporation) or reducing other discretionary spending. There can be no assurance that the
Company would be able to take any of the actions referred to above because of a variety of commercial
or market factors or constraints in the Company’s debt instruments, including, for example, market
conditions being unfavorable for an equity or debt offering, additional capital contributions or loans not

F-29

being available from afﬁliates or third parties or that the transactions may not be permitted under the
terms of the Company’s various debt instruments then in effect, because of restrictions on the incurrence
of debt, incurrence of liens, asset dispositions and related party transactions. In addition, such actions, if
taken, may not enable the Company to satisfy its cash requirements or comply with its debt covenants if
the actions do not generate a sufﬁcient amount of additional capital.

Revlon, Inc., as a holding company, will be dependent on the earnings and cash ﬂow of, and dividends
and distributions from, Products Corporation to pay its expenses and to pay any cash dividend or
distribution on Revlon, Inc.’s Class A Common Stock that may be authorized by the Board of Directors
of Revlon, Inc. The terms of the 2004 Credit Agreement, the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes
Line of Credit, the 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes, the 81⁄8% Senior Notes and the 9% Senior Notes
generally restrict Products Corporation from paying dividends or making distributions, except that
Products Corporation is permitted to pay dividends and make distributions to Revlon, Inc., among other
things, to enable Revlon, Inc. to pay expenses incidental to being a public holding company, including,
among other things, professional fees such as legal and accounting fees, regulatory fees such as
Commission ﬁling fees and other miscellaneous expenses related to being a public holding company and,
subject to certain limitations, to pay dividends or make distributions in certain circumstances to ﬁnance
the purchase by Revlon, Inc. of its Class A Common Stock in connection with the delivery of such Class
A Common Stock to grantees under the Stock Plan. (See ‘‘Subsequent Events’’ in Note 20 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements.)

10. Financial Instruments

The fair value of the Company’s long-term debt is based on the quoted market prices for the same
issues or on the current rates offered to the Company for debt of the same remaining maturities. The
estimated fair value of long-term debt (excluding amounts due to afﬁliates of $24.1 in 2003) at December
31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, was approximately $38.3 and $518.2 less than the carrying values of
$1,318.7 and $1,845.4, respectively.

Products Corporation also maintains standby and trade letters of credit with certain banks for various
corporate purposes under which Products Corporation is obligated, of which approximately $17.0 and
$22.3 (including amounts available under credit agreements in effect at that time) were maintained at
December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Included in these amounts is $11.0 and $10.5, at December 31,
2004 and 2003, respectively, in standby letters of credit, which support Products Corporation’s self-
insurance programs. The estimated liability under such programs is accrued by Products Corporation.

The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, trade receivables, notes

receivable, accounts payable and short-term borrowings approximate their fair values.

11.

Income Taxes

As a result of the closing of the Revlon Exchange Transactions, as of the end of March 25, 2004,
Revlon, Inc., Products Corporation and their U.S. subsidiaries were no longer included in the
MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings consolidated group (the ‘‘MacAndrews & Forbes Group’’) for federal
income tax purposes. The MacAndrews & Forbes Tax Sharing Agreement (as hereinafter deﬁned) will
remain in effect solely for taxable periods beginning on or after January 1, 1992, through and including
March 25, 2004. In these taxable periods, Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation were included in the
MacAndrews & Forbes Group, and Revlon, Inc.’s and Products Corporation’s federal taxable income and
loss were included in such group’s consolidated tax return ﬁled by MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings.
Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation were also included in certain state and local tax returns of
MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings or its subsidiaries. In June 1992, Revlon Holdings, Revlon, Inc.,
Products Corporation and certain of its subsidiaries, and MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings entered into
a tax sharing agreement (as subsequently amended and restated, the ‘‘MacAndrews & Forbes Tax Sharing
Agreement’’), pursuant to which MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings agreed to indemnify Revlon, Inc. and
Products Corporation against federal, state or local income tax liabilities of the MacAndrews & Forbes
Group (other than in respect of Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation) for taxable periods beginning on
or after January 1, 1992 during which Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation or a subsidiary of Products
Corporation was a member of such group. Pursuant to the MacAndrews & Forbes Tax Sharing

F-30

Agreement, for all such taxable periods, Products Corporation was required to pay to Revlon, Inc., which
in turn was required to pay to Revlon Holdings, amounts equal to the taxes that Products Corporation
would otherwise have had to pay if it were to ﬁle separate federal, state or local income tax returns
(including any amounts determined to be due as a result of a redetermination arising from an audit or
otherwise of the consolidated or combined tax liability relating to any such period which was attributable
to Products Corporation), except that Products Corporation was not entitled to carry back any losses to
taxable periods ending prior to January 1, 1992. No payments were required by Products Corporation or
Revlon, Inc. if and to the extent Products Corporation was prohibited under the terms of its 2004 Credit
Agreement from making tax sharing payments to Revlon, Inc. The 2004 Credit Agreement prohibits
Products Corporation from making such tax sharing payments under the MacAndrews & Forbes Tax
Sharing Agreement other than in respect of state and local income taxes. The MacAndrews & Forbes Tax
Sharing Agreement was amended, effective as of January 1, 2001, to eliminate a contingent payment to
Revlon, Inc. under certain circumstances in return for a $10 million note with interest at 12% and interest
and principal payable by MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings on December 31, 2005. As of December 31,
2004 and 2003, the outstanding balance of this note receivable was $15.9 and $14.2, respectively, and is
included in prepaid expenses and other in the 2004 Consolidated Balance Sheet and in other assets in the
2003 Consolidated Balance Sheet. As a result of tax net operating losses and prohibitions under the 2004
Credit Agreement, there were no federal tax payments or payments in lieu of taxes pursuant to the
MacAndrews & Forbes Tax Sharing Agreement in respect of 2004, 2003 and 2002.

Following the closing of the Revlon Exchange Transactions, Revlon, Inc. became the parent of a new
consolidated group for federal income tax purposes and Products Corporation’s federal taxable income
and loss will be included in such group’s consolidated tax returns. Accordingly, Revlon, Inc. and Products
Corporation entered into a tax sharing agreement (the ‘‘Revlon Tax Sharing Agreement’’) pursuant to
which Products Corporation will be required to pay to Revlon, Inc. amounts equal to the taxes that
Products Corporation would otherwise have had to pay if Products Corporation were to ﬁle separate
federal, state or local income tax returns, limited to the amount, and payable only at such times, as
Revlon, Inc. will be required to make payments to the applicable taxing authorities. The 2004 Credit
Agreement does not prohibit payments from Products Corporation to Revlon, Inc. to the extent required
under the Revlon Tax Sharing Agreement. As a result of tax net operating losses, we expect that there
will be no federal tax payments or payments in lieu of taxes from Products Corporation to Revlon, Inc.
pursuant to the Revlon Tax Sharing Agreement in respect of 2004.

Pursuant to the asset transfer agreement referred to in Note 16, Products Corporation assumed all
tax liabilities of Revlon Holdings other than (i) certain income tax liabilities arising prior to January 1,
1992 to the extent such liabilities exceeded reserves on Revlon Holdings’ books as of January 1, 1992 or
were not of the nature reserved for and (ii) other tax liabilities to the extent such liabilities are related to
the business and assets retained by Revlon Holdings. During the second quarter of 2003, the Company
resolved various tax audits, which resulted in a tax beneﬁt of $13.9, of which $6.9 was recorded directly
to capital deﬁciency since it relates to liabilities assumed by Products Corporation in connection with the
transfer agreements related to Products Corporation’s formation in 1992 (See Note 16). During 2004, the
Company resolved various state and federal tax audits and determined that certain tax liabilities were no
longer probable, which resulted in a tax beneﬁt of $19.3, of which $16.4 was recorded to capital deﬁciency
since it relates to liabilities assumed by Products Corporation in connection with the transfer agreements
related to Products Corporation’s formation in 1992 (See Note 16).

F-31

The Company’s loss before income taxes and the applicable provision (beneﬁt) for income taxes are

as follows:

Loss before income taxes:

Domestic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Provision (beneﬁt) for income taxes:

Federal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State and local . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Current . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Beneﬁts of operating loss carryforwards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Resolutions of tax audits. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Year Ended December 31,
2003

2002

2004

$(165.8)
32.6

$(133.2)

$ (1.7)
(0.8)
11.8

9.3

$ 12.6
1.6
(2.0)
(2.9)

9.3

$(136.5)
(16.8)

$(153.3)

$(213.0)
(68.7)

$(281.7)

(4.4)
0.4
4.5

0.5

8.3
1.9
(1.9)
(7.8)

(0.9)
0.4
5.3

4.8

8.0
(1.2)
(2.0)
—

0.5

4.8

The effective tax rate on loss before income taxes is reconciled to the applicable statutory federal

income tax rate as follows:

Statutory federal income tax rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State and local taxes, net of federal income tax beneﬁt . . . . . . . . .
Foreign and U.S. tax effects attributable to operations

outside the U.S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loss on early extinguishment of debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Change in valuation allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sale of businesses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Resolutions of tax audits. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Effective rate. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Year Ended December 31,
2003

2002

2004

(35.0)%
0.2

(35.0)%
0.1

(4.5)
(14.9)
61.5
—
(2.2)
1.8
6.9%

2.1
—
38.1
—
(5.1)
—
0.3%

(4.1)
—
44.1
(3.1)
—
(0.3)
1.7%

F-32

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to signiﬁcant portions of the deferred tax assets

and deferred tax liabilities at December 31, 2004 and 2003 are presented below:

Deferred tax assets:

Accounts receivable, principally due to doubtful accounts . . . . . . .
Inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net operating loss carryforwards – domestic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net operating loss carryforwards – foreign. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accruals and related reserves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Employee beneﬁts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State and local taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Advertising, sales discounts and returns and coupon

redemptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Capital loss carryover . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total gross deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less valuation allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Net deferred tax assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Deferred tax liabilities:

Plant, equipment and other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total gross deferred tax liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

December 31,

2004

2003

1.5
13.0
176.8
135.4
4.4
67.1
7.6

36.2
—
—
29.7

471.7
(441.7)

30.0

(23.5)
(2.1)

(25.6)

2.2
14.9
322.3
135.5
2.9
70.1
12.6

35.7
7.3
28.5
30.5

662.5
(628.0)

34.5

(27.0)
(2.4)

(29.4)

Net deferred tax assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4.4

5.1

In assessing the recoverability of its deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more
likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate
realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the
periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled
reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making
this assessment. Based upon the level of historical taxable income for certain international markets and
projections for future taxable income over the periods in which the deferred tax assets are deductible,
management believes it is more likely than not that the Company will realize the beneﬁts of certain
deductible differences existing at December 31, 2004.

The valuation allowance decreased by $186.3 during 2004 and increased by $58.8 during 2003.

During 2004, 2003 and 2002, certain of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries used operating loss
carryforwards to credit the current provision for income taxes by $2.0, $1.9, and $2.0, respectively. Certain
other foreign operations generated losses during 2004, 2003 and 2002 for which the potential tax beneﬁt
was reduced by a valuation allowance. At December 31, 2004, the Company had tax loss carryforwards
of approximately $932.2 of which $427.0 are foreign and $505.2 are domestic. Of the domestic losses, $94.6
represents tax losses generated by the Company from March 26, 2004 to December 31, 2004 and $410.6
represents losses of the Company not anticipated to be absorbed by the MacAndrews and Forbes Group
in accordance with the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (as amended, the ‘‘Code’’) and the Treasury
regulations issued thereunder. The losses expire in future years as follows: 2005-$42.6; 2006-$60.9;
2007-$127.8; 2008-$190.8; 2009 and beyond-$259.9; and unlimited-$250.2. The Company could receive the
beneﬁt of such tax loss carryforwards only to the extent it has taxable income during the carryforward
periods in the applicable tax jurisdictions. As a result of the closing of the Revlon Exchange Transactions,
as of the end of the day on March 25, 2004, Revlon Inc., Products Corporation and its U.S. subsidiaries
were no longer included in the MacAndrews & Forbes Group for federal income tax purposes. The Code
and the Treasury regulations issued thereunder govern both the calculation of the amount and allocation

F-33

to the members of the MacAndrews & Forbes Group of any consolidated federal net operating losses of
the group (‘‘CNOLs’’) that will be available to offset Revlon, Inc.’s taxable income and the taxable income
of its U.S. subsidiaries, including Products Corporation, for the taxable years beginning after March 25,
2004. Until MacAndrews & Forbes completes the ﬁling of its 2004 consolidated federal income tax return,
it is not possible to accurately determine the exact amount of CNOLs that will be allocated to the
Company as of December 31, 2004 because various factors could increase or decrease or eliminate these
amounts. These factors include, but are not limited to, the amount and nature of the income, gains or
losses that the other members of the MacAndrews & Forbes Group recognize in the 2004 taxable year
because any CNOLs are, pursuant to Treasury regulations, used to offset the taxable income of the
MacAndrews & Forbes Group for their entire tax year ending December 31, 2004. Only the amount of
any CNOLs that the MacAndrews & Forbes Group does not absorb by December 31, 2004 will be
available to be allocated to Revlon, Inc. and its U.S. subsidiaries, including Products Corporation, for
taxable years beginning on March 26, 2004. Subject to the foregoing, it is currently estimated that Revlon,
Inc. and its U.S. subsidiaries, including Products Corporation, had approximately $410 in U.S. federal net
operating losses and $10 of alternative minimum tax losses available to Revlon, Inc. and its U.S.
subsidiaries, including Products Corporation, as of March 25, 2004. Any losses that Revlon, Inc. and its
U.S. subsidiaries, including Products Corporation, may generate after March 25, 2004 will be available to
Revlon, Inc. for its use and its U.S. subsidiaries’, including Products Corporation, use and will not be
available for the use of the MacAndrews & Forbes Group.

Appropriate U.S. and foreign income taxes have been accrued on foreign earnings that have been or
are expected to be remitted in the near future. Unremitted earnings of foreign subsidiaries which have
been, or are currently intended to be, permanently reinvested in the future growth of the business are nil
at December 31, 2004, excluding those amounts which, if remitted in the near future, would not result in
signiﬁcant additional taxes under tax statutes currently in effect.

12. Savings Plan and Post-retirement Beneﬁts

Savings Plan

The Company offers a qualiﬁed deﬁned contribution plan for U.S.-based employees, the Revlon
Employees’ Savings, Investment and Proﬁt Sharing Plan (as amended, the ‘‘Savings Plan’’), which allows
eligible participants to contribute up to 25% of qualiﬁed compensation through payroll deductions. The
Company matches employee contributions at ﬁfty cents for each dollar contributed up to the ﬁrst 6% of
eligible compensation. The Company may also contribute proﬁt sharing contributions (if any) for
non-bonus eligible employees. In 2004, 2003 and 2002, the Company made cash matching contributions
to the Savings Plan of approximately $2.7, $2.8 and $2.3 respectively. There were no additional
contributions or proﬁt sharing contributions made during those years.

Pension:

A substantial portion of the Company’s employees in the U.S. are covered by deﬁned beneﬁt pension

plans. The Company uses September 30 as its measurement date for plan obligations and assets.