Revlon, Inc.

2
0
0
8

A
N
N
U
A
L

R
E
P
O
R
T

2008  A N N UA L   R E P O R T

BMT01177_AR_Cvr_30.indd   1
BMT01177_AR_Cvr_30.indd   1

4/13/2009   9:32:00 AM
4/13/2009   9:32:00 AM

 
 
BMT01177_AR_Cvr_28.indd   2

BMT01177_AR_Cvr_28.indd   2

4/10/2009   3:18:41 PM

4/10/2009   3:18:41 PM

David L. Kennedy
President and Chief Executive Officer

DEAR SHAREHOLDERS:

We continued to make progress in 2008, improving our operating
margins and generating positive free cash flow and net income from
continuing operations. Although overall net sales for the year were
down, Revlon brand color cosmetics net sales increased nine
percent.

Financial Highlights

Net Sales 
($ in millions)

$1,367.1

$1,346.8

2007

2008

Adjusted EBITDA1 
($ in millions)

16.2%

$221.4

18.4%

$248.1

2007

2008

Adjusted EBITDA

% of Net Sales 

Operating Income 
($ in millions)

8.7%

$118.4

2007

11.5%

$155.0

2008
2008

Operating Income

% of Net Sales 

Free Cash Flow2
($ in millions)

$26.0

($17.1)

2007

2008

Strategy

During 2008, we continued to make significant progress executing our strategy.

Build and leverage our strong brands, particularly the Revlon brand — We continued
to build and leverage our strong brands, focusing on the key drivers of profitable growth:

(cid:129) Innovative, high-quality, consumer-preferred brand offering,

(cid:129) Effective brand communication,

(cid:129) Appropriate levels of advertising and promotion, and

(cid:129) Superb execution with our retail partners.

We further strengthened our product offering in color cosmetics. We introduced a compre-
hensive lineup of Revlon and Almay new products for 2008 and for the first half of 2009. The
product launches included unique offerings for the mass channel, innovations in products and
packaging, and line extensions within our existing franchises. With our rolling three-year
product portfolio strategy, we remain focused on launching a strong pipeline of new products
each year in every segment of the color cosmetics category, while ensuring that our estab-
lished franchises remain relevant and competitive.

In 2008, our media strategy included a more focused allocation of advertising and promo-
tional spending, particularly in support of Revlon brand color cosmetics. We supported our
new product launches, as well as our existing product lines, with effective creative advertising
coupled with integrated promotional activities. For Revlon brand color cosmetics, this resulted
in dollar volume3 growth in the product lines and segments on which we focused. For
example:

(cid:129) In the face segment, in the U.S., the Revlon brand grew 12.2% in 2008, which was
significantly faster than the segment growth of 3.3%. This growth in the face segment was
driven by three important 2008 new product launches; namely — Revlon ColorStay Mineral
foundation, Revlon Custom Creations foundation, and Revlon Beyond Natural Makeup,
which were supported by TV and print advertising featuring Halle Berry and Jessica Alba, as
well as promotions in each quarter of 2008.

(cid:129) In the lip segment, in the U.S., Revlon had the number one dollar share3 in 2008 driven by
the Super Lustrous Lipcolor franchise, which was reinvigorated with seasonal and on-trend
shades and new advertising featuring Jessica Alba, and the ColorStay franchise, with the
introduction of Revlon ColorStay mineral lipglaze, the first longwearing mineral lipcolor
with ColorStay longwear technology.

(cid:129) In the nail segment, in the U.S., the Revlon core nail franchise grew dollar volume by 15.2%

and was the leading nail franchise.

Similarly for Almay, we saw dollar volume growth in 2008 in the product lines and segments
on which we focused. Almay’s 9.4% growth in the eye segment in the U.S. was driven by the
Almay Intense i-Color Collection and the Almay Bright Eyes Collection. Almay’s 9.2% growth
in the face segment in the U.S. was driven by the continued success of Almay Smart Shade
foundation and 2008 launches of Almay TLC makeup and pressed powder.

Later in 2008, we introduced Almay Pure Blends, a natural collection that delivers a full range
of shades, radiant finishes and eco-friendly products and packaging. These hypoallergenic
formulas for face, eye and lip are made from over 95% natural ingredients, with no com-
promise in color and performance. The packaging is made from 44% post-consumer recycled
materials, on average, and traditional blister cards are replaced with more environmentally-
friendly hang tags.

2

In 2008, furthering our Brand Ambassador strategy, we signed Jennifer Connelly and Elle
Macpherson to represent the Revlon brand globally, along with Halle Berry, Jessica Alba and
Beau Garrett. We engaged Gucci Westman, world-renowned makeup artist, to serve as
Revlon’s Global Artistic Director; and, we signed Leslie Bibb to represent the Almay brand,
along with Elaine Mellencamp and Marina Theiss.

In our Revlon beauty tools business, we launched several new products during the year, and
recently introduced, with TV advertising support, the superior quality Revlon Pedi-EXPERT, our
entry into the fast-expanding foot-smoothing pedicure tool segment.

We continued to realize positive results from our focused marketing activities in support of
Revlon ColorSilk hair color.

For the Mitchum brand, we continued the successful “Mitchum Man” advertising campaign
and, in the fourth quarter, we launched a significant packaging upgrade.

Improve the execution of our strategies and plans, and provide for continued
improvement in our organizational capability — During 2008 we continued to
strengthen our organizational capability, recruiting talented and experienced professionals
in all functions throughout the Company.

Continue to strengthen our international business — Our international business con-
tinued to grow, driven by Revlon brand color cosmetics primarily in the Asia Pacific region and
Canada, while operating margins continued to expand.

Improve our operating profit margins and cash flow — We continued to see the benefits
of our day-to-day focus on rigorous cost control and initiatives to continuously improve
efficiency. Favorable manufacturing efficiencies contributed to the improvement in gross
profit margins. In the U.S., we completed a restructuring of our sales force, reducing staffing
while better aligning our resources to serve our customers and efficiently implement our
strategy.

Improve our capital structure — We reduced debt by $110 million in 2008. To do this, we
used $63 million of the net proceeds from the sale of our non-core Bozzano brand in Brazil,
with an associated annualized interest savings of $7 million. We used the balance of the
Bozzano sale proceeds of $32 million, in addition to our free cash flow from operations, to
reduce revolver borrowings. In addition, the maturity date of the MacAndrews & Forbes term
loan was extended to August, 2010.

Outlook

As we look forward in 2009, while we expect economic conditions and the retail sales
environment to remain uncertain around the world, we believe that we are better positioned
than in many years to maximize our business results in light of these conditions. Specifically, we
have:

(cid:129) Strong global brands,

(cid:129) A highly capable organization,

3

(cid:129) A sustainable, reduced cost structure, and

(cid:129) An improved capital structure.

We are encouraged by the continued growth in mass channel color cosmetic consumption in
the U.S. and in key markets around the world throughout 2008 and in early 2009. We are
continuing to execute our strategy and manage our business while maintaining flexibility to
adapt to changes in business conditions. We are also continuing our intense focus on the key
growth drivers of our business, which we believe, over time, will generate profitable net sales
growth and sustainable positive free cash flow.

We would like to acknowledge all our employees around the world for their loyalty and
continued hard work. We would also like to thank our Board of Directors for their leadership,
counsel and support during 2008.

We remain true to our long-term vision: To provide glamour, excitement and innova-
tion to consumers through high-quality products at affordable prices.

David L. Kennedy
President and Chief Executive Officer
April 2009

1. Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure that the Company defines as income/(loss) from
continuing operations before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, gains/losses on foreign currency
transactions, gains/losses on the early extinguishment of debt and miscellaneous expenses and is reconciled
to net income/(loss), its most directly comparable GAAP measure, below.
Free cash flow is a non-GAAP measure that the Company defines as net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities, less capital expenditures for property, plant and equipment, plus proceeds from the sale of certain
assets and is reconciled to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities, its most directly comparable
GAAP measure, below.

2.

3. All mass retail share and consumption data is U.S. mass-retail dollar volume according to ACNielsen (an
independent research entity). ACNielsen data is an aggregate of the drug channel, Kmart, Target and Food
and Combo stores, and excludes Wal-Mart and regional mass volume retailers, as well as prestige,
department stores, door-to-door, internet, television shopping, specialty stores, perfumeries and other
outlets, all of which are channels for cosmetics sales. This data represents approximately two-thirds of the
Company’s U.S. mass-retail dollar volume. Such data represents ACNielsen’s estimates based upon mass
retail sample data gathered by ACNielsen and is therefore subject to some degree of variance and may
contain slight rounding differences.

4

REVLON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
RECONCILIATION OF UNAUDITED ADJUSTED EBITDA TO NET INCOME
($ in millions)

In the table set forth below, Adjusted EBITDA, which is a non-GAAP financial measure, is reconciled to net income/(loss), its most directly
comparable GAAP measure. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as income/(loss) from continuing operations before interest, taxes, depreciation,
amortization, gains/losses on foreign currency transactions, gains/losses on the early extinguishment of debt and miscellaneous expenses.

Year Ended
December 31,

2008

2007

(Unaudited)

Reconciliation to net income (loss):

Net income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 57.9

$ (16.1)

Income from discontinued operations, including gain on disposal, net of taxes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Income (loss) from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Interest expense, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Amortization of debt issuance costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign currency gains (losses), net. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Miscellaneous, net

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Provision for income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

44.8

13.1

119.0

5.6
0.1

1.1

16.1

93.1

Adjusted EBITDA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$248.1

2.9

(19.0)

133.7

3.3
(6.8)

(0.3)

7.5

103.0

$221.4

In calculating Adjusted EBITDA, the Company excludes the effects of gains/losses on foreign currency transactions, gains/losses on the early
extinguishment of debt, results of and gains/losses on discontinued operations and miscellaneous expenses because the Company’s
management believes that some of these items may not occur in certain periods, the amounts recognized can vary significantly from period to
period and these items do not facilitate an understanding of the Company’s operating performance. The Company’s management utilizes
Adjusted EBITDA as an operating performance measure in conjunction with GAAP measures, such as net income and gross margin calculated
in accordance with GAAP.

The Company’s management uses Adjusted EBITDA as an integral part of its reporting and planning processes and as one of the primary
measures to, among other things —

(i)

(ii)

(iii)

(iv)

(v)

(vi)

monitor and evaluate the performance of the Company’s business operations;

facilitate management’s internal comparisons of the Company’s historical operating performance of its business operations;

facilitate management’s external comparisons of the results of its overall business to the historical operating performance of other
companies that may have different capital structures and debt levels;

review and assess the operating performance of the Company’s management team and as a measure in evaluating employee
compensation and bonuses;

analyze and evaluate financial and strategic planning decisions regarding future operating investments; and

plan for and prepare future annual operating budgets and determine appropriate levels of operating investments.

The Company’s management believes that Adjusted EBITDA is useful to investors to provide them with disclosures of the Company’s
operating results on the same basis as that used by the Company’s management. Additionally, the Company’s management believes that
Adjusted EBITDA provides useful information to investors about the performance of the Company’s overall business because such measure
eliminates the effects of unusual or other infrequent charges that are not directly attributable to the Company’s underlying operating
performance. Additionally, the Company’s management believes that because it has historically provided Adjusted EBITDA to investors, that
including such non-GAAP measure in this annual report provides consistency in its financial reporting and continuity to investors for
comparability purposes. Accordingly, the Company believes that the presentation of Adjusted EBITDA, when used in conjunction with GAAP
financial measures, is a useful financial analysis tool, used by the Company’s management as described above that can assist investors in
assessing the Company’s financial condition, operating performance and underlying strength. Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered in
isolation or as a substitute for net income/(loss) prepared in accordance with GAAP. Other companies may define EBITDA differently. Also,
while EBITDA is defined differently than Adjusted EBITDA for the Company’s credit agreement, certain financial covenants in its borrowing
arrangements are tied to similar measures. Adjusted EBITDA should be read in conjunction with the Company’s financial statements and
footnotes contained in the documents that the Company files with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

5

REVLON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED FREE CASH FLOW RECONCILIATION
($ in millions)

In the table set forth below, free cash flow, which is a non-GAAP measure, is reconciled to net cash provided by operating activities, its most
directly comparable GAAP measure. Free cash flow is defined as net cash provided by (used in) operating activities, less capital expenditures
for property, plant and equipment, plus proceeds from the sale of certain assets. Free cash flow excludes proceeds on sale of discontinued
operations. Management uses free cash flow to evaluate its business and financial performance and overall liquidity and in strategic planning.
Management believes that free cash flow is useful for investors because it provides them with an important perspective on the cash available
for debt repayment and other strategic measures, after making necessary capital investments in property and equipment to support the
Company’s ongoing business operations, and provides them with the same results that management uses as the basis for making resource
allocation decisions. Free cash flow does not represent the residual cash flow available for discretionary expenditures, as it excludes certain
expenditures such as mandatory debt service requirements, which for the Company are significant. The Company does not intend for free
cash flow to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the related GAAP measures. Other companies may define free cash flow or
similarly titled measures differently. Free cash flow should be read in conjunction with the Company’s financial statements and footnotes
contained in the documents that the Company files with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Reconciliation to net cash provided by operating activities:

Net cash provided by operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less capital expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Plus proceeds from the sale of a non-core trademark and certain assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Free cash flow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Year Ended
December 31,

2008

2007

(Unaudited)

$ 33.1
(20.7)

13.6

$ 26.0

$ 0.3
(19.8)

2.4

$(17.1)

6

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K

(Mark One)
≤ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008

OR

n

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from

to

Commission file number 1-11178
REVLON, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

DELAWARE
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)

237 Park Avenue, New York, New York
(Address of principal executive offices)

13-3662955
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

10017
(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (212) 527-4000

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) or 12(g) of the Act:

Title of each class
Class A Common Stock

Name of each exchange on which registered
New York Stock Exchange

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
No ≤

Yes n

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

Yes n

No ≤

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes ≤

No n

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is
not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a
smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting
company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

≤

Large accelerated filer n

Accelerated filer ≤

Non-accelerated filer n
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company n

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

Yes n

No ≤

The aggregate market value of the registrant’s Class A Common Stock held by non-affiliates (using the New York Stock
Exchange closing price as of June 30, 2008, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal
quarter) was approximately $170,954,535.
As of December 31, 2008, 48,250,163 shares of Class A Common Stock and 3,125,000 shares of Class B Common Stock were
outstanding. At such date 28,207,735 shares of Class A Common Stock were beneficially owned by MacAndrews & Forbes
Holdings Inc. and its affiliates and all of the shares of Class B Common Stock were owned by REV Holdings LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company and an indirectly wholly-owned subsidiary of MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings Inc.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of Revlon, Inc.’s definitive Proxy Statement to be delivered to shareholders in connection with its Annual Meeting
of Stockholders to be held on or about June 4, 2009 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.

Revlon, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Form 10-K

For the Year Ended December 31, 2008

Table of Contents

Item 1.
Item 1A.
Item 1B.
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.

Item 5.

Item 6.
Item 7.

Item 7A.
Item 8.
Item 9.

Item 9A.
Item 9B.

Item 10.
Item 11.
Item 12.

Item 13.
Item 14.

Item 15.

PART I

Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Risk Factors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unresolved Staff Comments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Legal Proceedings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

PART II
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Selected Financial Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of

Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial

Disclosure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Controls and Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

PART III

Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Executive Compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Principal Accounting Fees and Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

PART IV

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

(Consolidated Financial Statements) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

(Internal Control Over Financial Reporting) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Financial Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Financial Statement Schedule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Signatures
Certifications
Exhibits

1

Page

2
10
22
22
23
23

24
25

27
51
53

53
53
54

60
60

60
60
60

62
F-1

F-2

F-3
F-4
F-61

Item 1. Business

Background

PART I

Revlon, Inc. (and together with its subsidiaries, the “Company”) conducts its business exclusively
through its direct wholly-owned operating subsidiary, Revlon Consumer Products Corporation and its
subsidiaries (“Products Corporation”). Revlon, Inc. is a direct and indirect majority-owned subsidiary of
MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings Inc. (“MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings” and together with certain of its
affiliates other than the Company, “MacAndrews & Forbes”), a corporation wholly-owned by Ronald O.
Perelman.

The Company’s vision is to provide glamour, excitement and innovation to consumers through high-
quality products at affordable prices. The Company operates in a single segment and manufactures, markets
and sells an extensive array of cosmetics, women’s hair color, beauty tools, fragrances, skincare, anti-
perspirants/deodorants and personal care products. The Company is one of the world’s leading cosmetics
companies in the mass retail channel (as hereinafter defined). The Company believes that its global brand
name recognition, product quality and marketing experience have enabled it to create one of the strongest
consumer brand franchises in the world.

The Company’s products are sold worldwide and marketed under such brand names as Revlon,
including the Revlon ColorStay, Revlon Super Lustrous and Revlon Age Defying franchises, as well as the
Almay brand, including the Almay Intense i-Color and Almay Smart Shade franchises, in cosmetics; Revlon
ColorSilk in women’s hair color; Revlon in beauty tools; Charlie and Jean Naté in fragrances; Ultima II and
Gatineau in skincare; and Mitchum in personal care products.

The Company’s principal customers include large mass volume retailers, chain drug stores and food
stores (collectively, the “mass retail channel”) in the U.S., as well as certain department stores and other
specialty stores, such as perfumeries, outside the U.S. The Company also sells beauty products to U.S. mil-
itary exchanges and commissaries and has a licensing business pursuant to which the Company licenses
certain of its key brand names to third parties for complimentary beauty-related products and accessories.

The Company was founded by Charles Revson, who revolutionized the cosmetics industry by intro-
ducing nail enamels matched to lipsticks in fashion colors over 75 years ago. Today, the Company has
leading market positions in a number of its principal product categories in the U.S. mass retail channel,
including color cosmetics (face, lip, eye and nail categories), women’s hair color, beauty tools and anti-
perspirants/deodorants. The Company also has leading market positions in several product categories in
certain foreign countries, including Australia, Canada and South Africa.

The Company’s Business Strategy

The Company’s business strategy includes:

• Building and leveraging our strong brands. We are building and leveraging our brands,
particularly the Revlon brand, across the categories in which we compete. In addition to
Revlon and Almay brand color cosmetics, we are seeking to drive growth in other beauty care
categories,
including women’s hair color, beauty tools, anti-perspirants/deodorants and
skincare.

We continue to focus on our key growth drivers, including: innovative, high-quality, consumer-
preferred new products; effective integrated brand communication; appropriate levels of
advertising and promotion; and superb execution with our retail partners, along with disci-
plined spending and rigorous cost control.

•

Improving the execution of our strategies and plans and providing for continued improvement
in our organizational capability through enabling and developing our employees. We con-
tinue to build our organizational capability primarily through a focus on recruitment and

2

retention of skilled people, providing opportunities for professional development, as well as
new and expanded responsibilities and roles for employees who have demonstrated capability
and rewarding our employees for success.

• Continuing to strengthen our international business. We continue to focus on improving our

operating performance in our international business.

•

Improving our operating profit margins and cash flow. We are focused on improving our
financial performance through steady improvement in operating profit margins and cash flow
generation.

• Continuing to improve our capital structure. We are focused on strengthening our balance

sheet and reducing debt over time.

Significant Transactions Recently Completed

November 2008 — Extension of the maturity of the MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term
Loan

Pursuant to a November 2008 amendment, the maturity date of the MacAndrews & Forbes Senior
Subordinated Term Loan (as hereinafter defined) was extended from August 2009 to the earlier of (1) the
date that Revlon, Inc. issues equity with gross proceeds of at least $107 million, which proceeds would be
used to repay the $107 million remaining aggregate principal balance of the MacAndrews & Forbes Senior
Subordinated Term Loan, or (2) August 1, 2010.

September 2008 — 1-for-10 Reverse Stock Split

In September 2008, Revlon, Inc. effected a 1-for-10 reverse stock split of Revlon, Inc.’s Class A and
Class B common stock (the “Reverse Stock Split”). As a result of the Reverse Stock Split, each ten shares of
Revlon, Inc.’s Class A and Class B common stock issued and outstanding at the end of September 15, 2008
were automatically combined into one share of Class A common stock and Class B common stock,
respectively.

July 2008 — Sale of Bozzano and Partial Paydown of MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated
Term Loan

In July 2008, the Company consummated the disposition of its non-core Bozzano business, a men’s hair
care and shaving line of products, and certain other non-core brands, including Juvena and Aquamarine,
which were sold by the Company only in the Brazilian market (the “Bozzano Sale Transaction”). The
transaction was effected through the sale of the Company’s indirect Brazilian subsidiary, Ceil Comércio E
Distribuidora Ltda. (“Ceil”), to Hypermarcas S.A., a Brazilian publicly-traded, consumer products cor-
poration. The purchase price was approximately $107 million, including approximately $3 million in cash on
Ceil’s balance sheet on the closing date. Net proceeds, after the payment of taxes and transaction costs, were
approximately $95 million. In September 2008, Products Corporation used $63 million of the net proceeds
from the Bozzano Sale Transaction to repay $63 million in aggregate principal amount of the MacAn-
drews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan, leaving $107 million in aggregate principal amount
remaining outstanding under such loan.

April 2008 and September 2007 — Interest Rate Swap Transactions

In April 2008, Products Corporation entered into a $150 million two-year floating-to-fixed interest rate
swap transaction related to indebtedness under its 2006 Term Loan Facility (as hereinafter defined) (the
“2008 Interest Rate Swap”), intended to reduce its exposure to interest rate volatility. Following the
execution of this interest rate swap transaction and the $150 million two-year floating-to-fixed interest rate
swap transaction that Products Corporation entered into in September 2007 (the “2007 Interest Rate Swap”
and together with the 2008 Interest Rate Swap, the “Interest Rate Swaps”), approximately 60% of the
Company’s total long-term debt is at fixed interest rates and approximately 40% is at floating interest rates.

3

February 2008 — Refinancing of the 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes

On February 1, 2008, Products Corporation repaid in full the $167.4 million remaining aggregate
principal amount of its 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes (as hereinafter defined), which matured on such
date. (See “Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources — 2008 Repayment of the 85⁄8% Senior
Subordinated Notes with the MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan” regarding Products
Corporation’s full repayment of the balance of the 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes upon maturity on
February 1, 2008).

Recent Developments

Senior Management Changes

On February 25, 2009, Revlon, Inc. announced that the Board of Directors of each of Revlon, Inc. and
Products Corporation elected Alan T. Ennis as a Director of Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation and to
also serve as President, Revlon International, effective March 1, 2009, in addition to continuing to serve in
his role as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. Mr. Ennis has served as the
Company’s Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from November 2006, and also as
Treasurer from June 2008. In addition to his finance responsibilities as Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Ennis
will have responsibility for the general management of all of the Company’s International operations.

Recent Debt Reduction Transactions

In February 2009, Products Corporation used excess cash flow generated in 2008 to reduce its long-
term debt by prepaying $16.6 million in aggregate principal amount of term loan indebtedness outstanding
under its 2006 Term Loan Facility (as hereinafter defined). Such prepayment satisfied Products Corpo-
ration’s requirement under the 2006 Term Loan Agreement (as hereinafter defined) to prepay term loan
indebtedness with 50% of its annual “excess cash flow” (as defined under such agreement) within 100 days
after its fiscal year end. This prepayment fully offsets Products Corporation’s required quarterly term loan
amortization payments of $2.1 million per quarter that would otherwise have been due on April 15, 2009,
July 15, 2009, October 15, 2009, January 15, 2010, April 15, 2010, July 15, 2010, October 15, 2010 and
$1.9 million of the amortization payment otherwise due on January 15, 2011. After giving effect to such
prepayment, at February 13, 2009, the aggregate principal amount outstanding under Products Corpo-
ration’s 2006 Term Loan Facility was approximately $815 million.

Products

Revlon, Inc. conducts business exclusively through Products Corporation. The Company manufactures
and markets a variety of products worldwide. The following table sets forth the Company’s principal brands.

COSMETICS

HAIR

BEAUTY TOOLS

FRAGRANCE

Revlon
Almay

Revlon ColorSilk

Revlon

Charlie
Jean Naté

ANTI-
PERSPIRANTS/
DEODORANTS

Mitchum

SKINCARE

Gatineau
Ultima II

Cosmetics — Revlon: The Company sells a broad range of cosmetics under its flagship Revlon brand
designed to fulfill consumer needs, principally priced in the upper range of the mass retail channel,
including face, lip, eye and nail products. Certain of the Company’s products incorporate patented, patent-
pending or proprietary technology. (See “New Product Development and Research and Development”).

The Company sells face makeup, including foundation, powder, blush and concealers, under the
Revlon brand name. Revlon Age Defying, which is targeted for women in the over-35 age bracket,
incorporates the Company’s patented Botafirm ingredients to help reduce the appearance of lines and
wrinkles. The Company’s new Revlon Age Defying Spa foundation and concealer were introduced for 2009

4

to instantly revitalize and brighten, while protecting against the appearance of fine lines. The Company also
markets a complete range of Revlon ColorStay long-wearing liquid and powder face makeup with patented
SoftFlex technology for enhanced comfort. The Revlon ColorStay mineral collection includes loose powder
foundation, as well as baked blush and bronzer. The Revlon Beyond Natural collection, focusing on a
naturally glamorous look, offers patent pending skin-tone matching liquid foundation.

The Company markets several different lines of Revlon lip makeup, including lipstick, lip gloss and lip
liner, under several Revlon brand names. Super Lustrous is the Company’s flagship wax-based lipcolor,
offered in a wide variety of shades of lipstick and lipgloss, and has LiquiSilk technology designed to boost
moisturization using silk dispersed in emollients. ColorStay Soft & Smooth, with patent pending lip
technology, offers long-wearing benefits while enhancing comfort with SoftFlex technology, while Color-
Stay Overtime lipcolor and ColorStay Overtime Sheer use patented transfer resistant technology. In 2008,
the Company introduced ColorStay Mineral lipglaze, the Company’s first long wearing lipgloss with up to
eight hours of wear. For 2009, the Company introduced Revlon Cremé Gloss, a lipgloss that provides deeply
pigmented color with extreme gloss shine.

The Company’s eye makeup products include mascaras, eyeliners, eye shadows and brow products,
under several Revlon brand names. In mascaras, key franchises include Fabulash, which uses a lash
perfecting brush for fuller lashes, and Lash Fantasy Total Definition, the two-step primer and mascara with
lash separating brushes for enhanced definition. In eyeliners, Revlon Luxurious Color liner uses a smooth
formula to provide rich, luxurious color. In addition, in 2009, the Company introduced Revlon Luxurious
Color kohl eyeliner for intense matte color. In eye shadow, Revlon ColorStay 12-Hour patented long-
wearing eyeshadow enables color to look fresh for up to 12 hours. In 2009, the Company also introduced
new Revlon Matte eye shadows, which provide high impact color combined with a soft matte finish.

The Company’s nail color and nail care lines include enamels, treatments and cuticle preparations. The
Company’s core Revlon nail enamel uses a patented formula that provides consumers with improved wear,
application, shine and gloss in a toluene-free, formaldehyde-free and phthalate-free formula.

Cosmetics — Almay: The Company’s Almay brand consists of hypo-allergenic, dermatologist-tested,
fragrance-free cosmetics and skincare products. Almay products include face, eye and lip makeup and
makeup removers.

Introduced for 2009, Almay Pure Blends is a new collection of natural cosmetics that delivers a full
range of shades and radiant finishes with eco-friendly packaging. These formulae for face, eye and lip are
made from over 95% natural ingredients, with no compromise in color and performance.

Within the face category, with Almay Smart Shade containing patented ingredients formulas for
foundation, blush, bronzer and concealer, Almay consumers can find products that are designed to match
their skin tones. Almay TLC Truly Lasting Color makeup and pressed powder have longwearing formulas
that nourish and protect the skin for up to 16 hours of coverage.

In eye makeup, Almay Intense i-Color includes the “Bring Out” and “Play Up” collections —
providing ways to enhance and intensify eyes through color-coordinated shades of shadow, liner and
mascara for each eye color. Almay Bright Eyes Collection, introduced in 2008, is a three product,
innovative and coordinated collection made up of eye base and concealer in one, eye shadow and a
liner/highler duo. The collection helps eyes look refreshed and radiant due to Almay’s expert formulas that
work with light reflectors to naturally brighten, de-puff and refresh the look of the entire eye area. The
Almay brand flagship Almay One Coat mascara franchise includes products for lash thickening and visible
lengthening and the patented Almay Triple Effect mascara for a more dramatic look. Almay eye makeup
removers are offered in a range of pads and towlettes.

Hair: The Company sells both haircolor and haircare products throughout the world. In women’s
haircolor, the Company markets brands, including the Revlon ColorSilk, which offer radiant, rich color with
conditioning.

5

Beauty Tools: The Company sells Revlon Beauty Tools, which include nail and eye grooming tools,
such as clippers, scissors, files, tweezers and eye lash curlers. Revlon Beauty Tools are sold individually and
in sets under the Revlon brand name. For the first half of 2009, the Company launched Revlon Pedi-Expert,
an ergonomically-engineered, patent-pending pedicure tool.

Fragrances: The Company sells a selection of moderately-priced and premium-priced fragrances,
including perfumes, eau de toilettes, colognes and body sprays. The Company’s portfolio includes fra-
grances such as Charlie and Jean Naté.

Anti-perspirants/deodorants:

In the area of anti-perspirants/deodorants, the Company markets

Mitchum anti-perspirant brands in many countries.

Skincare: The Company sells skincare products in the U.S. and in international markets under
internationally-recognized brand names and under various regional brands, including the Company’s
premium-priced Gatineau brand, as well as Ultima II.

Marketing

The Company markets extensive consumer product lines principally priced in the upper range of the

mass retail channel and certain other channels outside of the U.S.

The Company uses print, television and internet advertising, as well as point-of-sale merchandising,
including displays and samples, and coupons and other trial incentives. The Company’s marketing empha-
sizes a uniform global image and product for its portfolio of core brands. The Company coordinates
advertising campaigns with in-store promotional and other marketing activities. The Company develops
jointly with retailers carefully tailored advertising, point-of-purchase and other focused marketing
programs.

The Company also uses cooperative advertising programs, supported by Company-paid or Company-
subsidized demonstrators, and coordinated in-store promotions and displays. Other marketing materials
designed to introduce the Company’s newest products to consumers and encourage trial and purchase in-
store include trial-size products and couponing. Additionally, the Company maintains separate websites,
www.revlon.com, www.almay.com and www.mitchumman.com devoted to the Revlon, Almay and Mitchum
brands, respectively. Each of these websites feature product and promotional information for the brands,
respectively, and are updated regularly to stay current with the Company’s new product launches and other
advertising and promotional campaigns.

New Product Development and Research and Development

The Company believes that it is an industry leader in the development of innovative and technolog-
ically-advanced cosmetics and beauty products. The Company’s marketing and research and development
groups identify consumer needs and shifts in consumer preferences in order to develop new products, tailor
line extensions and promotions and redesign or reformulate existing products to satisfy such needs or
preferences. The Company’s research and development group is comprised of departments specialized in
the technologies critical to the Company’s various product categories. The Company has a cross-functional
product development process, including a rigorous process for the continuous development and evaluation
of new product concepts, formed in 2007 and led by senior executives in marketing, sales, product
development, operations, law and finance, which has improved the Company’s new product commercial-
ization process and created a comprehensive, long-term portfolio strategy. This new process is intended to
optimize the Company’s ability to regularly bring to market its innovative new product offerings and to
manage the Company’s product portfolio.

The Company operates an extensive cosmetics research and development facility in Edison, New
Jersey. The scientists at the Edison facility are responsible for all of the Company’s new product research
and development worldwide, performing research for new products, ideas, concepts and packaging. The
research and development group at the Edison facility also performs extensive safety and quality testing on

6

the Company’s products, including toxicology, microbiology and package testing. Additionally, quality
control testing is performed at each of the Company’s manufacturing facilities.

As of December 31, 2008, the Company employed approximately 160 people in its research and
development activities, including specialists in pharmacology, toxicology, chemistry, microbiology, engi-
neering, biology, dermatology and quality control. In 2008, 2007 and 2006, the Company spent $24.3 million,
$24.4 million and $24.4 million, respectively, on research and development activities.

Manufacturing and Related Operations and Raw Materials

During 2008, the Company’s cosmetics and/or personal care products were produced at the Company’s
facilities in North Carolina, Venezuela, France and South Africa and at third-party facilities around the
world. The Company also manufactured products at a facility in Mexico which it sold and closed in
December 2008.

The Company continually reviews its manufacturing needs against its manufacturing capacities to
identify opportunities to reduce costs and operate more efficiently. The Company purchases raw materials
and components throughout the world, and continuously pursues reductions in cost of goods through the
global sourcing of raw materials and components from qualified vendors, utilizing its purchasing capacity
designed to maximize cost savings. The Company’s global sourcing strategy for materials and components
from accredited vendors is also designed to ensure the quality and the continuity of supply of the raw
materials and components. The Company believes that alternate sources of raw materials and components
exist and does not anticipate any significant shortages of, or difficulty in obtaining, such materials.

Distribution

The Company’s products are sold in more than 100 countries across six continents. The Company’s
worldwide sales forces had approximately 290 people as of December 31, 2008. In addition, the Company
utilizes sales representatives and independent distributors to serve certain markets and related distribution
channels.

United States. Net sales in the U.S. accounted for approximately 58% of the Company’s 2008 net
sales, a majority of which were made in the mass retail channel. The Company also sells a broad range of
consumer products to U.S. Government military exchanges and commissaries. The Company licenses its
trademarks to select manufacturers for complimentary beauty-related products and accessories that the
Company believes have the potential to extend the Company’s brand names and image. As of December 31,
2008, eleven (11) licenses were in effect relating to seventeen (17) product categories, which are marketed
principally in the mass-market distribution channel. Pursuant to such licenses, the Company retains strict
control over product design and development, product quality, advertising and the use of its trademarks.
These licensing arrangements offer opportunities for the Company to generate revenues and cash flow
through royalties and renewal fees, some of which have been prepaid.

As part of the Company’s strategy to increase the retail consumption of its products, the Company’s
retail merchandisers stock and maintain the Company’s point-of-sale wall displays intended to ensure that
high-selling SKUs are in stock and to ensure the optimal presentation of the Company’s products in retail
outlets.

International. Net sales outside the U.S. accounted for approximately 42% of the Company’s
2008 net sales. The five largest countries in terms of these sales were Canada, South Africa, Australia,
U.K and Venezuela, which together accounted for approximately 23% of the Company’s 2008 consolidated
net sales. The Company distributes its products through drug stores and chemist shops, hypermarkets, mass
volume retailers, general merchandise stores, department stores and specialty stores such as perfumeries
outside the U.S. At December 31, 2008, the Company actively sold its products through wholly-owned
subsidiaries established in 14 countries outside of the U.S. and through a large number of distributors and
licensees elsewhere around the world.

7

Customers

The Company’s principal customers include large mass volume retailers and chain drug stores,
including such well-known retailers as Wal-Mart, Target, Kmart, Walgreens, Rite Aid, CVS and Longs
(CVS and Longs merged in the fourth quarter of 2008) in the U.S., Shoppers DrugMart in Canada, A.S.
Watson & Co. retail chains in Asia Pacific and Europe, and Boots in the United Kingdom. Wal-Mart and its
affiliates worldwide accounted for approximately 23% of the Company’s 2008 consolidated net sales. As is
customary in the consumer products industry, none of the Company’s customers is under an obligation to
continue purchasing products from the Company in the future. The Company expects that Wal-Mart and a
small number of other customers will, in the aggregate, continue to account for a large portion of the
Company’s net sales. (See Item 1A. Risk Factors — “The Company depends on a limited number of
customers for a large portion of its net sales and the loss of one or more of these customers could reduce the
Company’s net sales and have a material adverse affect on the Company’s business, financial condition
and/or results of operations”).

Competition

The consumer products business is highly competitive. The Company competes primarily on the basis

of:

• developing quality products with innovative performance features, shades, finishes, components

and packaging;

educating consumers on the brands’ product benefits;

anticipating and responding to changing consumer demands in a timely manner, including the
timing of new product introductions and line extensions;

•

•

• offering attractively priced products relative to the product benefits provided;

• maintaining favorable brand recognition;

•

•

generating competitive margins and inventory turns for its retail customers by providing relevant
products and executing effective pricing, incentive and promotion programs;

ensuring product availability through effective planning and replenishment collaboration with
retailers;

• providing strong and effective advertising, marketing, promotion and merchandising support;

• maintaining an effective sales force; and

• obtaining sufficient retail floor space, optimal in-store positioning and effective presentation of its

products at retail.

The Company competes in selected product categories against a number of multi-national manufac-
turers. In addition to products sold in the mass retail channel and demonstrator-assisted channels, the
Company’s products also compete with similar products sold in prestige and department stores, television
shopping, door-to-door, specialty stores, the internet, perfumeries and other distribution outlets. Certain of
the Company’s competitors include, among others, L’Oréal S.A., The Procter & Gamble Company, Avon
Products, Inc. and The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. (See Item 1A. Risk Factors — “Competition in the
consumer products business could materially adversely affect the Company’s net sales and its share of the
mass retail channel and could have an adverse affect on the Company’s business, financial condition and/or
results of operations”).

Patents, Trademarks and Proprietary Technology

The Company’s major trademarks are registered in the U.S. and in well over 100 other countries, and
the Company considers trademark protection to be very important to its business. Significant trademarks
include Revlon, ColorStay, Revlon Age Defying makeup with Botafirm, Super Lustrous, Almay, Almay

8

Smart Shade, Mitchum, Charlie, Jean Naté, Revlon ColorSilk and, outside the U.S., Gatineau and Ultima
II. The Company regularly renews its trademark registrations in the ordinary course of business.

The Company utilizes certain proprietary, patent-pending or patented technologies in the formulation,
packaging or manufacture of a number of the Company’s products, including, among others, Revlon
ColorStay cosmetics, including Revlon ColorStay Soft & Smooth and the Revlon ColorStay mineral
collection; Revlon Age Defying the Revlon Beyond Natural collection; Revlon Beyond Natural lipcolor;
Fabulash mascara; classic Revlon nail enamel; Almay Smart Shade makeup; Almay One Coat cosmetics;
Almay Triple Effect mascara; Mitchum anti-perspirant; and the new Revlon Pedi-Expert pedicure tool. The
Company also protects certain of its packaging and component concepts through patents. The Company
considers its proprietary technology and patent protection to be important to its business.

The Company files patents on a continuing basis in the ordinary course of business on certain of the
Company’s new technologies. Patents in the U.S. are effective for up to 20 years and international patents
are generally effective for up to 20 years. The patents that the Company currently has in place expire at
various times between 2009 and 2029 and the Company expects to continue to file patent applications on
certain of its technologies in the ordinary course of business in the future.

Government Regulation

The Company is subject to regulation by the Federal Trade Commission (the “FTC”) and the Food and
Drug Administration (the “FDA”) in the U.S., as well as various other federal, state, local and foreign
regulatory authorities, including the European Commission in the European Union (the “EU”). The
Company’s Oxford, North Carolina manufacturing facility is registered with the FDA as a drug manu-
facturing establishment, permitting the manufacture of cosmetics that contain over-the-counter drug
ingredients, such as sunscreens and anti-perspirants. Compliance with federal, state, local and foreign
laws and regulations pertaining to discharge of materials into the environment, or otherwise relating to the
protection of the environment, has not had, and is not anticipated to have, a material effect on the
Company’s capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position. Regulations in the U.S., the EU and in
other countries in which the Company operates that are designed to protect consumers or the environment
have an increasing influence on the Company’s product claims, ingredients and packaging.

Industry Segments, Foreign and Domestic Operations

The Company operates in a single segment. Certain geographic, financial and other information of the
Company is set forth in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Note 19 “Geographic, Financial
and Other Information” to the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company.

Employees

As of December 31, 2008, the Company employed approximately 5,600 people. As of December 31,
2008, approximately 20 of such employees in the U.S. were covered by collective bargaining agreements.
The Company believes that its employee relations are satisfactory. Although the Company has experienced
minor work stoppages of limited duration in the past in the ordinary course of business, such work stoppages
have not had a material effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition.

Available Information

The public may read and copy any materials that the Company files with the SEC at the SEC’s Public
Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. Information in the Public Reference Room
may be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the SEC maintains an internet site that
contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file with
the SEC at http://www.sec.gov. The Company’s Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, proxy statements and amendments to those reports, are also
available free of charge on our internet website at http://www.revloninc.com as soon as reasonably
practicable after such reports are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC.

9

Item 1A. Risk Factors

In addition to the other information in this report, investors should consider carefully the following risk

factors when evaluating the Company’s business.

Revlon, Inc. is a holding company with no business operations of its own and is dependent on its subsidiaries
to pay certain expenses and dividends. In addition, shares of the capital stock of Products Corporation,
Revlon, Inc.’s wholly-owned operating subsidiary, are pledged by Revlon, Inc. to secure its obligations
under the 2006 Credit Agreements.

Revlon, Inc. is a holding company with no business operations of its own. Revlon, Inc.’s only material
asset is all of the outstanding capital stock of Products Corporation, Revlon, Inc.’s wholly-owned operating
subsidiary, through which Revlon, Inc. conducts its business operations. As such, Revlon, Inc.’s net income
(loss) has historically consisted predominantly of its equity in the net income (loss) of Products Corpo-
ration, which for 2008, 2007 and 2006 was approximately $65.8 million, $(9.0) million and $(244.5) million,
respectively, which excluded approximately $7.7 million, $7.0 million and $6.6 million, respectively, in
expenses primarily related to Revlon, Inc. being a public holding company. Revlon, Inc. is dependent on the
earnings and cash flow of, and dividends and distributions from, Products Corporation to pay Revlon, Inc.’s
expenses incidental to being a public holding company. Products Corporation may not generate sufficient
cash flow to pay dividends or distribute funds to Revlon, Inc. because, for example, Products Corporation
may not generate sufficient cash or net income; state laws may restrict or prohibit Products Corporation
from issuing dividends or making distributions unless Products Corporation has sufficient surplus or net
profits, which Products Corporation may not have; or because contractual restrictions, including negative
covenants contained in Products Corporation’s various debt instruments, may prohibit or limit such
dividends or distributions.

The terms of the 2006 Credit Agreements, the MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan
Agreement and the indenture governing Products Corporation’s outstanding 91⁄2% Senior Notes generally
restrict Products Corporation from paying dividends or making distributions, except that Products Cor-
poration is permitted to pay dividends and make distributions to Revlon, Inc., among other things, to enable
Revlon, Inc. to make certain payments and pay expenses incidental to being a public holding company.

All of the shares of the capital stock of Products Corporation held by Revlon, Inc. are pledged to secure
Revlon, Inc.’s guarantee of Products Corporation’s obligations under the 2006 Credit Agreements. A
foreclosure upon the shares of Products Corporation’s common stock would result in Revlon, Inc. no longer
holding its only material asset and would have a material adverse effect on the holders of Revlon, Inc.’s
Common Stock and would be a change of control under Products Corporation’s other debt instruments.

Products Corporation’s substantial indebtedness could adversely affect the Company’s operations and
flexibility and Products Corporation’s ability to service its debt.

Products Corporation has a substantial amount of outstanding indebtedness. As of December 31, 2008,
the Company’s total indebtedness was $1,331.4 million, primarily including $833.7 million aggregate
principal amount outstanding under the 2006 Term Loan Facility, $390.0 million in aggregate principal
face amount outstanding of Products Corporation’s 91⁄2% Senior Notes, $107.0 million aggregate principal
amount outstanding under the MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan and nil under the
2006 Revolving Credit Facility. (See “Recent Developments”). The Company has a history of net losses
prior to 2008 and, in addition, if it is unable to achieve sustained profitability in future periods, it could
adversely affect the Company’s operations and Products Corporation’s ability to service its debt.

The Company is subject to the risks normally associated with substantial indebtedness, including the
risk that the Company’s operating revenues will be insufficient to meet required payments of principal and
interest, and the risk that Products Corporation will be unable to refinance existing indebtedness when it

10

becomes due or that the terms of any such refinancing will be less favorable than the current terms of such
indebtedness. Products Corporation’s substantial indebtedness could also:

•

•

limit the Company’s ability to fund (including by obtaining additional financing) the costs and
expenses of the execution of the Company’s business strategy, future working capital, capital
expenditures, advertising or promotional expenses, new product development costs, purchases and
reconfigurations of wall displays, acquisitions, investments, restructuring programs and other
general corporate requirements;

require the Company to dedicate a substantial portion of its cash flow from operations to payments
on Products Corporation’s indebtedness, thereby reducing the availability of the Company’s cash
flow for the execution of the Company’s business strategy and for other general corporate
purposes;

• place the Company at a competitive disadvantage compared to its competitors that have less debt;

•

limit the Company’s flexibility in responding to changes in its business and the industry in which it
operates; and

• make the Company more vulnerable in the event of adverse economic conditions or a downturn in

its business.

Although agreements governing Products Corporation’s indebtedness, including the 2006 Credit
Agreements, the indenture governing Products Corporation’s outstanding 91⁄2% Senior Notes and the
MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan Agreement, limit Products Corporation’s ability to
borrow additional money, under certain circumstances Products Corporation is allowed to borrow a
significant amount of additional money, some of which, in certain circumstances and subject to certain
limitations, could be secured indebtedness.

Products Corporation’s ability to pay the principal of its indebtedness depends on many factors.

The MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan expires on the earlier of (1) the date that
Revlon, Inc. issues equity with gross proceeds of at least $107 million, which proceeds would be contributed
to Products Corporation and used to repay the $107 million remaining aggregate principal balance of the
MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan, or (2) August 1, 2010. The 91⁄2% Senior Notes
mature in April 2011 and the 2006 Credit Agreements mature in January 2012. Products Corporation
currently anticipates that, in order to pay the principal amount of its outstanding indebtedness upon the
occurrence of any event of default, to repurchase its 91⁄2% Senior Notes if a change of control occurs or in
the event that Products Corporation’s cash flows from operations are insufficient to allow it to pay the
principal amount of its indebtedness at maturity, the Company may be required to refinance Products
Corporation’s indebtedness, seek to sell assets or operations, seek to sell additional Revlon, Inc. equity or
debt securities or Products Corporation debt securities or seek additional capital contributions or loans
from MacAndrews & Forbes or from the Company’s other affiliates or third parties. The Company may be
unable to take any of these actions, because of a variety of commercial or market factors or constraints in
Products Corporation’s debt instruments, including, for example, market conditions being unfavorable for
an equity or debt issuance, additional capital contributions or loans not being available from affiliates
and/or third parties, or that the transactions may not be permitted under the terms of the various debt
instruments then in effect, such as due to restrictions on the incurrence of debt, incurrence of liens, asset
dispositions and/or related party transactions.

Revlon, Inc. is a public holding company and has no business operations of its own, and Revlon, Inc.’s
only material asset is the capital stock of Products Corporation. None of the Company’s affiliates are
required to make any capital contributions, loans or other payments to Products Corporation regarding its
obligations on its indebtedness. Products Corporation may not be able to pay the principal amount of its
indebtedness if the Company took any of the above actions because, under certain circumstances, the
indenture governing Products Corporation’s outstanding 91⁄2% Senior Notes or any of its other debt
instruments (including the 2006 Credit Agreements and the MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated

11

Term Loan Agreement) or the debt instruments of Products Corporation’s subsidiaries then in effect may
not permit the Company to take such actions. (See “Restrictions and covenants in Products Corporation’s
debt agreements limit its ability to take certain actions and impose consequences in the event of failure to
comply”).

Additionally, the economic conditions during the latter part of 2008 and in early 2009 and the recent
volatility in the financial markets have contributed to a substantial tightening of the credit markets and a
reduction in credit availability, including lending by financial institutions. If the tightening of the credit
markets and reduction in credit availability continue for an extended period, the Company may be unable
to refinance or replace Products Corporation’s outstanding indebtedness at or prior to their respective
maturity dates, which would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition
and/or results of operations.

Restrictions and covenants in Products Corporation’s debt agreements limit its ability to take certain
actions and impose consequences in the event of failure to comply.

Agreements governing Products Corporation’s indebtedness, including the 2006 Credit Agreements,
the indenture governing Products Corporation’s outstanding 91⁄2% Senior Notes and the MacAndrews &
Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan Agreement, contain a number of significant restrictions and
covenants that limit Products Corporation’s ability and its subsidiaries’ ability, among other things (subject
in each case to limited exceptions), to:

• borrow money;

• use assets as security in other borrowings or transactions;

• pay dividends on stock or purchase stock;

•

•

sell assets;

enter into certain transactions with affiliates; and

• make certain investments.

In addition, the 2006 Credit Agreements contain financial covenants limiting Products Corporation’s
senior secured debt-to-EBITDA ratio (in the case of the 2006 Term Loan Agreement) and, under certain
circumstances, requiring Products Corporation to maintain a minimum consolidated fixed charge coverage
ratio (in the case of the 2006 Revolving Credit Agreement). These covenants affect Products Corporation’s
operating flexibility by, among other things, restricting its ability to incur expenses and indebtedness that
could be used to fund the costs of executing the Company’s business strategy and to grow the Company’s
business, as well as to fund general corporate purposes.

The breach of certain covenants contained in the 2006 Credit Agreements would permit Products
Corporation’s lenders to accelerate amounts outstanding under the 2006 Credit Agreements, which would
in turn constitute an event of default under the MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan
Agreement and the indenture governing Products Corporation’s outstanding 91⁄2% Senior Notes, if the
amount accelerated exceeds $25.0 million and such default remains uncured for 10 days following notice
from MacAndrews & Forbes with respect to the MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan
Agreement or the trustee or holders of the applicable percentage under the 91⁄2% Senior Notes indenture.

In addition, holders of Products Corporation’s outstanding 91⁄2% Senior Notes may require Products
Corporation to repurchase their respective notes in the event of a change of control under the 91⁄2% Senior
Notes indenture. (See “Products Corporation’s ability to pay the principal of its indebtedness depends on
many factors”). Products Corporation may not have sufficient funds at the time of any such breach of any
such covenant or change of control to repay in full the borrowings under the 2006 Credit Agreements, the
MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan Agreement or to repurchase or redeem its
outstanding 91⁄2% Senior Notes.

12

Events beyond the Company’s control, such as decreased consumer spending in response to weak
economic conditions or weakness in the cosmetics category in the mass retail channel; adverse changes in
currency; decreased sales of the Company’s products as a result of increased competitive activities by the
Company’s competitors; changes in consumer purchasing habits, including with respect to shopping
channels; retailer inventory management; retailer space reconfigurations or reductions in retailer display
space; less than anticipated results from the Company’s existing or new products or from its advertising
and/or marketing plans; or if the Company’s expenses, including, without limitation, for advertising and
promotions or for returns related to any reduction of retail space, product discontinuances or otherwise,
exceed the anticipated level of expenses, could impair the Company’s operating performance, which could
affect Products Corporation’s ability and that of its subsidiaries to comply with the terms of Products
Corporation’s debt instruments.

Under such circumstances, Products Corporation and its subsidiaries may be unable to comply with the
provisions of Products Corporation’s debt instruments, including the financial covenants in the 2006 Credit
Agreements. If Products Corporation is unable to satisfy such covenants or other provisions at any future
time, Products Corporation would need to seek an amendment or waiver of such financial covenants or
other provisions. The respective lenders under the 2006 Credit Agreements may not consent to any
amendment or waiver requests that Products Corporation may make in the future, and, if they do consent,
they may not do so on terms which are favorable to it and/or Revlon, Inc.

In the event that Products Corporation was unable to obtain any such waiver or amendment and it was
not able to refinance or repay its debt instruments, Products Corporation’s inability to meet the financial
covenants or other provisions of the 2006 Credit Agreements would constitute an event of default under its
debt instruments, including the 2006 Credit Agreements, which would permit the bank lenders to accelerate
the 2006 Credit Agreements, which in turn would constitute an event of default under the MacAndrews &
Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan Agreement and the indenture governing Products Corporation’s
outstanding 91⁄2% Senior Notes, if the amount accelerated exceeds $25.0 million and such default remains
uncured for 10 days following notice from MacAndrews & Forbes with respect to the MacAndrews &
Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan Agreement or the trustee under the 91⁄2% Senior Notes indenture.

Products Corporation’s assets and/or cash flow and/or that of Products Corporation’s subsidiaries may
not be sufficient to fully repay borrowings under its outstanding debt instruments, either upon maturity or if
accelerated upon an event of default, and if Products Corporation was required to repurchase its
outstanding 91⁄2% Senior Notes or repay the MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan
upon a change of control, Products Corporation may be unable to refinance or restructure the payments on
such debt. Further, if Products Corporation was unable to repay, refinance or restructure its indebtedness
under the 2006 Credit Agreements, the lenders could proceed against the collateral securing that
indebtedness.

Limits on Products Corporation’s borrowing capacity under the 2006 Revolving Credit Facility may affect
the Company’s ability to finance its operations.

While the 2006 Revolving Credit Facility currently provides for up to $160.0 million of commitments,
Products Corporation’s ability to borrow funds under this facility is limited by a borrowing base determined
relative to the value, from time to time, of eligible accounts receivable and eligible inventory in the U.S. and
the U.K. and eligible real property and equipment in the U.S.

If the value of these eligible assets is not sufficient to support the full $160.0 million borrowing base,
Products Corporation will not have full access to the 2006 Revolving Credit Facility, but rather could have
access to a lesser amount determined by the borrowing base. Further, if Products Corporation borrows
funds under this facility, subsequent changes in the value or eligibility of the assets within the borrowing
base could cause Products Corporation to be required to pay down the amounts outstanding so that there is
no amount outstanding in excess of the then-existing borrowing base.

Products Corporation’s ability to make borrowings under the 2006 Revolving Credit Facility is also
conditioned upon its compliance with other covenants in the 2006 Revolving Credit Agreement, including a

13

fixed charge coverage ratio that applies when the “excess borrowing base” (representing the difference
between (1) the borrowing base under the 2006 Revolving Credit Facility and (2) the amounts outstanding
under such facility) is less than $20.0 million. Because of these limitations, Products Corporation may not
always be able to meet its cash requirements with funds borrowed under the 2006 Revolving Credit Facility,
which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and/or results of
operations.

At January 31, 2009, the 2006 Term Loan Facility was fully drawn, and the Company had a liquidity
position of approximately $184.0 million, consisting of cash and cash equivalents (net of any outstanding
checks) of $55.1 million, as well as $128.9 million in available borrowings under the 2006 Revolving Credit
Facility, based upon the calculated borrowing base less approximately $13.1 million of outstanding letters of
credit. The 2006 Revolving Credit Facility was undrawn at such date.

The 2006 Revolving Credit Facility is syndicated to a group of banks and financial institutions. Each
bank is responsible to lend its portion of the $160 million commitment if and when Products Corporation
seeks to draw under the 2006 Revolving Credit Facility. The lenders may assign their commitments to other
banks and financial institutions in certain cases without prior notice to Products Corporation. If a lender is
unable to meet its lending commitment, then the other lenders under the 2006 Revolving Credit Facility
have the right, but not the obligation, to lend additional funds to make up for the defaulting lender’s
commitment, if any. While Products Corporation has never had any of its lenders under the 2006 Revolving
Credit Facility or any predecessor revolving credit facility fail to fulfill their lending commitment, economic
conditions in late 2008 and early 2009 and the volatility in the financial markets have impacted the liquidity
and financial condition of certain banks and financial institutions. Based on information available to the
Company, the Company has no reason to believe that any of the lenders under Products Corporation’s 2006
Revolving Credit Facility would be unable to fulfill their commitments under the 2006 Revolving Credit
Facility as of December 31, 2008. However, if one or more lenders under the 2006 Revolving Credit Facility
were unable to fulfill their commitment to lend, such inability would impact the Company’s liquidity and,
depending upon the amount involved and the Company’s liquidity requirements, could have an adverse
affect on the Company’s ability to fund its operations, which could have a material adverse effect on the
Company’s business, financial condition and/or results of operations.

A substantial portion of Products Corporation’s indebtedness is subject to floating interest rates.

A substantial portion of Products Corporation’s indebtedness is subject to floating interest rates, which
makes the Company more vulnerable in the event of adverse economic conditions, increases in prevailing
interest rates or a downturn in the Company’s business. As of December 31, 2008, $534.2 million of
Products Corporation’s total indebtedness, or approximately 40% of Products Corporation’s total indebt-
edness, was subject to floating interest rates, after giving effect to the Interest Rate Swaps.

Under the 2006 Term Loan Facility, loans bear interest, at Products Corporation’s option, at either the
Eurodollar Rate plus 4.0% per annum, which is based upon LIBOR, or the Alternate Base Rate (as defined
in the 2006 Term Loan Agreement) plus 3.0% per annum, which Alternate Base Rate is based on the
greater of Citibank, N.A.’s announced base rate and the U.S. federal funds rate plus 0.5%; provided that
pursuant to the 2007 Interest Rate Swap transaction that Products Corporation entered into in September
2007 with Citibank, N.A. acting as the counterparty, the LIBOR portion of the interest rate on $150.0 mil-
lion of outstanding indebtedness under the 2006 Term Loan Facility was effectively fixed at 4.692% through
September 17, 2009 (which, based upon the 4.0% applicable margin, effectively fixed the interest rate on
such notional amount at 8.692% for the 2-year term of the 2007 Interest Rate Swap) and pursuant to the
2008 Interest Rate Swap transaction that Products Corporation entered into in April 2008 with Citibank,
N.A. acting as the counterparty, the LIBOR portion of the interest rate on $150.0 million of outstanding
indebtedness under the 2006 Term Loan Facility was effectively fixed at 2.66% through April 16, 2010
(which, based upon the 4.0% applicable margin, effectively fixed the interest rate on such notional amount
at 6.66% for the 2-year term of the 2008 Interest Rate Swap). Under the terms of the Interest Rate Swaps,
Products Corporation is required to pay to the counterparty a quarterly fixed interest rate of 4.692% on the
$150.0 million notional amount under the 2007 Interest Rate Swap, which commenced in December 2007,

14

and a quarterly fixed interest rate of 2.66% on the $150.0 million notional amount under the 2008 Interest
Rate Swap, which commenced in June 2008 while receiving under each of the Interest Rate Swaps variable
interest rate payments from the counterparty equal to the three-month U.S. dollar LIBOR. Borrowings
under the 2006 Revolving Credit Facility (other than loans in foreign currencies) bear interest at a rate
equal to, at Products Corporation’s option, either (i) the Eurodollar Rate plus 2.0% per annum or (ii) the
Alternate Base Rate (as defined in the 2006 Revolving Credit Agreement) plus 1.0% per annum. Loans in
foreign currencies bear interest in certain limited circumstances, or if mutually acceptable to Products
Corporation and the relevant foreign lenders, at the Local Rate, and otherwise at the Eurocurrency Rate (as
each such term is defined in the 2006 Revolving Credit Agreement), in each case plus 2.0%.

If any of LIBOR, the base rate, the U.S. federal funds rate or such equivalent local currency rate
increases, the Company’s debt service costs will increase to the extent that Products Corporation has
elected such rates for its outstanding loans.

Based on the amounts outstanding under the 2006 Credit Agreements and other short-term borrow-
ings (which, in the aggregate, is Products Corporation’s only debt currently subject to floating interest rates
and after giving effect to the Interest Rate Swaps) as of December 31, 2008, an increase in LIBOR of 1%
would increase the Company’s annual interest expense by approximately $5.4 million. Increased debt
service costs would adversely affect the Company’s cash flow. While Products Corporation may enter into
other interest hedging contracts, the 2006 Credit Agreements limit the notional amount that may be
outstanding on such transactions at any time to $300 million, which amount is currently outstanding.
Products Corporation may not be able to enter into additional hedging contracts on a cost-effective basis,
any additional hedging transactions it might enter into may not achieve their intended purpose and shifts in
interest rates may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and/or
results of operations.

The Company depends on its Oxford, North Carolina facility for production of a substantial portion of its
products. Disruptions to this facility, or at other third party facilities at which the Company’s products are
manufactured, could affect the Company’s business, financial condition and/or results of operations.

The Company produces a substantial portion of its products at its Oxford, North Carolina facility.
Significant unscheduled downtime at this facility, or at other third party facilities at which the Company’s
products are manufactured, whether due to equipment breakdowns, power failures, natural disasters,
weather conditions hampering delivery schedules or other disruptions, including those caused by tran-
sitioning manufacturing from other facilities to the Company’s Oxford, North Carolina facility, or any other
cause could adversely affect the Company’s ability to provide products to its customers, which could affect
the Company’s sales, business, financial condition and/or results of operations. Additionally, if product sales
exceed forecasts or production, the Company could, from time to time, not have an adequate supply of
products to meet customer demands, which could cause the Company to lose sales.

The Company’s new product introductions may not be as successful as the Company anticipates, which
could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and/or results of
operations.

The Company has implemented a rigorous process for the continuous development and evaluation of
new product concepts, formed in 2007 and led by senior executives in marketing, sales, product develop-
ment, operations, law and finance, which has improved the Company’s new product commercialization
process and created a comprehensive portfolio strategy. This new process is intended to optimize the
Company’s ability to regularly bring to market its innovative new product offerings and to manage the
Company’s product portfolio. Each new product launch, including those resulting from this new product
development process, carries risks, as well as the possibility of unexpected consequences, including:

•

the acceptance of the new product launches by, and sales of such new products to, the Company’s
retail customers may not be as high as the Company anticipates;

15

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

the Company’s advertising and marketing strategies for its new products may be less effective than
planned and may fail to effectively reach the targeted consumer base or engender the desired
consumption;

the rate of purchases by the Company’s consumers may not be as high as the Company anticipates;

the Company’s wall displays to showcase the new products may fail to achieve their intended
effects;

the Company may experience out-of-stocks and/or product returns exceeding its expectations as a
result of its new product launches or reductions in retail display space;

the Company may incur costs exceeding its expectations as a result of the continued development
and launch of new products, including, for example, advertising and promotional expenses, sales
return expenses or other costs related to launching new products;

the Company may experience a decrease in sales of certain of the Company’s existing products as a
result of newly-launched products;

the Company’s product pricing strategies for new product launches may not be accepted by its retail
customers and/or its consumers, which may result in the Company’s sales being less than it
anticipates; and

any delays or difficulties impacting the Company’s ability, or the ability of the Company’s suppliers
to timely manufacture, distribute and ship products, displays or display walls in connection with
launching new products, such as due to inclement weather conditions or those delays or difficulties
discussed under “The Company depends on its Oxford, North Carolina facility for production of a
substantial portion of its products. Disruptions to this facility, or at other third party facilities at
which the Company’s products are manufactured, could affect the Company’s business, financial
condition and/or results of operations” could affect the Company’s ability to ship and deliver
products to meet its retail customers’ reset deadlines.

Each of the risks referred to above could delay or impede the Company’s ability to achieve its sales
objectives, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition
and/or results of operations.

The Company’s ability to service its debt and meet its cash requirements depends on many factors,
including achieving anticipated levels of revenue and expenses. If such revenue or expense levels prove to
be other than as anticipated, the Company may be unable to meet its cash requirements or Products
Corporation may be unable to meet the requirements of the financial covenants under the 2006 Credit
Agreements, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition
and/or results of operations.

The Company currently expects that operating revenues, cash on hand, and funds available for
borrowing under the 2006 Revolving Credit Agreement and other permitted lines of credit will be sufficient
to enable the Company to cover its operating expenses for 2009, including cash requirements in connection
with the execution of the Company’s business strategy, purchases of permanent wall displays, capital
expenditure requirements, payments in connection with the Company’s restructuring programs, severance
not otherwise included in the Company’s restructuring programs, debt service payments and costs and
regularly scheduled pension and post-retirement plan contributions and benefit payments.

If the Company’s anticipated level of revenue is not achieved, however, because of, for example,
decreased consumer spending in response to weak economic conditions or weakness in the cosmetics
category in the mass retail channel; adverse changes in currency; decreased sales of the Company’s products
as a result of increased competitive activities by the Company’s competitors; changes in consumer
purchasing habits, including with respect to shopping channels; retailer inventory management; retailer
space reconfigurations or reductions in retailer display space; less than anticipated results from the
Company’s existing or new products or from its advertising and/or marketing plans; or if the Company’s

16

expenses, including, without limitation, for advertising and promotions or for returns related to any
reduction of retail space, product discontinuances or otherwise, exceed the anticipated level of expenses,
the Company’s current sources of funds may be insufficient to meet its cash requirements. In addition, such
developments, if significant, could reduce the Company’s revenues and could adversely affect Products
Corporation’s ability to comply with certain financial covenants under the 2006 Credit Agreements.

If operating revenues, cash on hand and funds available for borrowing are insufficient to cover the
Company’s expenses or are insufficient to enable Products Corporation to comply with the financial
covenants under the 2006 Credit Agreements, the Company could be required to adopt one or more
alternatives listed below:

• delaying the implementation of or revising certain aspects of the Company’s business strategy;

•

•

reducing or delaying purchases of wall displays or advertising or promotional expenses;

reducing or delaying capital spending;

• delaying, reducing or revising the Company’s restructuring plans;

•

•

•

•

refinancing Products Corporation’s indebtedness;

selling assets or operations;

seeking additional capital contributions and/or loans from MacAndrews & Forbes, the Company’s
other affiliates and/or third parties;

selling additional Revlon, Inc. equity or debt securities or debt securities of Revlon, Inc. or Products
Corporation; or

•

reducing other discretionary spending.

If the Company is required to take any of these actions, it could have a material adverse effect on its
business, financial condition and/or results of operations. In addition, the Company may be unable to take
any of these actions, because of a variety of commercial or market factors or constraints in Products
Corporation’s debt instruments, including, for example, market conditions being unfavorable for an equity
or debt issuance, additional capital contributions or loans not being available from affiliates and/or third
parties, or that the transactions may not be permitted under the terms of the various debt instruments then
in effect, such as due to restrictions on the incurrence of debt, incurrence of liens, asset dispositions and/or
related party transactions.

Such actions, if ever taken, may not enable the Company to satisfy its cash requirements or enable
Products Corporation to comply with the financial covenants under the 2006 Credit Agreements if the
actions do not result in sufficient savings or generate a sufficient amount of additional capital, as the case
may be. See also,“— Restrictions and covenants in Products Corporation’s debt agreements limit its ability
to take certain actions and impose consequences in the event of failure to comply” which discusses, among
other things, the consequences of noncompliance with Products Corporation’s credit agreement covenants.

Economic conditions and the volatility in the financial markets could have a material adverse effect on the
Company’s business, financial condition and/or results of operations or on the financial condition of its
customers and suppliers.

The economic conditions in late 2008 and early 2009 and the volatility in the financial markets in late
2008 and early 2009, both in the U.S. and in many other countries where the Company operates, have
contributed and may continue to contribute to higher unemployment levels, decreased consumer spending,
reduced credit availability and/or declining business and consumer confidence. Such conditions could have
an impact on consumer purchases and/or retail customer purchases of the Company’s products, which could
result in a reduction of sales, operating income and cash flows. This could have a material adverse effect on
the Company’s business, financial condition and/or results of operations. Additionally, disruptions in the
credit and other financial markets and economic conditions could, among other things, impair the financial

17

condition of one or more of the Company’s customers or suppliers, thereby increasing the risk of customer
bad debts or non-performance by suppliers.

The Company depends on a limited number of customers for a large portion of its net sales and the loss of
one or more of these customers could reduce the Company’s net sales and have a material adverse effect on
the Company’s business, financial condition and/or results of operations.

For 2008, 2007 and 2006, Wal-Mart, Inc. accounted for approximately 23%, 24% and 23%, respec-
tively, of the Company’s worldwide net sales. The Company expects that for 2009 and future periods, Wal-
Mart and a small number of other customers will, in the aggregate, continue to account for a large portion of
the Company’s net sales. These customers have demanded, and may continue to demand, increased service
and other accomodations. The Company may be affected by changes in the policies and demands of its retail
customers relating to service levels, inventory de-stocking or limitations on access to wall display space. As
is customary in the consumer products industry, none of the Company’s customers is under an obligation to
continue purchasing products from the Company in the future.

The loss of Wal-Mart or one or more of the Company’s other customers that may account for a
significant portion of the Company’s net sales, or any significant decrease in sales to these customers,
including as a result of retailer consolidation, or any significant decrease in the Company’s retail display
space in any of these customers’ stores, could reduce the Company’s net sales and therefore could have a
material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and/or results of operations.

Declines in the financial markets will result in increased pension expense and increased cash contributions
to the Company’s pension plans.

Declines in the U.S. and global financial markets in late 2008 resulted in significant declines on pension
plan assets for 2008, which will result in increased pension expense for 2009 and increased cash contri-
butions to the Company’s pension plans for 2010 and beyond. Future volatility in the financial markets may
further affect the Company’s return on pension plan assets for 2009 and in subsequent years. Such volatility
could also affect the discount rate used to value the Company’s year-end pension benefit obligations. One
or more of these factors, individually or taken together, could further impact required cash contributions to
the Company’s pension plans and pension expense in 2010 and beyond. Any one or more of these
conditions could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and/or
results of operations.

The Company may be unable to increase its sales through the Company’s primary distribution channels,
which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and/or results of
operations.

In the U.S., mass volume retailers and chain drug and food stores currently are the primary distribution
channels for the Company’s products. Additionally, other channels, including prestige and department
stores, television shopping, door-to-door, specialty stores, the internet, perfumeries and other distribution
outlets, combined account for a significant amount of sales of cosmetics and beauty care products. A
decrease in consumer demand in the U.S. mass retail channel for color cosmetics, retailer inventory
management, a reduction in retailer display space and/or a change in consumers’ purchasing habits, such as
by buying more cosmetics and beauty care products in channels in which the Company does not currently
compete, could impact the sales of its products through these distribution channels, which could reduce the
Company’s net sales and therefore have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial
condition and/or results of operations.

Competition in the cosmetics and beauty care products business could materially adversely affect the
Company’s net sales and its share of the mass retail channel and could have an adverse effect on the
Company’s business, financial condition and/or results of operations.

The cosmetics and beauty care products business is highly competitive. The Company competes

primarily on the basis of:

• developing quality products with innovative performance features, shades, finishes and packaging;

18

•

•

educating consumers on the Company’s product benefits;

anticipating and responding to changing consumer demands in a timely manner, including the
timing of new product introductions and line extensions;

• offering attractively priced products, relative to the product benefits provided;

• maintaining favorable brand recognition;

•

•

generating competitive margins and inventory turns for the Company’s retail customers by
providing relevant products and executing effective pricing, incentive and promotion programs;

ensuring product availability through effective planning and replenishment collaboration with
retailers;

• providing strong and effective advertising, marketing, promotion and merchandising support;

• maintaining an effective sales force; and

• obtaining and retaining sufficient retail display space, optimal in-store positioning and effective

presentation of the Company’s products at retail.

An increase in the amount of competition that the Company faces could have a material adverse effect
on its share of the mass retail channel and revenues. The Company experienced significant declines in its
share in color cosmetics in the U.S. mass retail channel from approximately 32% in the second quarter of
1998 to approximately 22% in the second quarter of 2002. In 2008, the Company achieved a combined
U.S. color cosmetics share in the U.S. mass retail channel of 18.6% (with the Revlon brand registering a
U.S. mass retail channel share of 12.7% for 2008, compared to 12.9% for 2007, and the Almay brand
registering a U.S. mass retail channel share of 5.9% for 2008, compared to 6.0% for 2007). It is possible that
declines in the Company’s share of the mass retail channel could occur in the future.

In addition, the Company competes against a number of multi-national manufacturers, some of which
are larger and have substantially greater resources than the Company, and which may therefore have the
ability to spend more aggressively on advertising and marketing and have more flexibility to respond to
changing business and economic conditions than the Company. In addition to products sold in the mass
retail channel, the Company’s products also compete with similar products sold through other channels,
including prestige and department stores, television shopping, door-to-door, specialty stores, the internet,
perfumeries and other distribution outlets.

Additionally, the Company’s major retail customers periodically assess the allocation of retail display
space among competitors and in the course of doing so could elect to reduce the display space allocated to
the Company’s products, if, for example, the Company’s marketing strategies for its new and/or existing
products are less effective than planned, fail to effectively reach the targeted consumer base or engender the
desired consumption; and/or the rate of purchases by the Company’s consumers are not as high as the
Company anticipates. Any significant loss of display space could have an adverse effect on the Company’s
business, financial condition and/or results of operations.

The Company’s foreign operations are subject to a variety of social, political and economic risks and have
been, and are expected to continue to be affected by foreign currency fluctuation, which could adversely
affect the results of the Company’s business, financial condition and/or results of operations and the value
of its foreign assets.

As of December 31, 2008, the Company had operations based in 14 foreign countries and its products
were sold throughout the world. The Company is exposed to the risk of changes in social, political and
economic conditions inherent in operating in foreign countries, including those in Asia, Eastern Europe,
Latin America (including Venezuela) and South Africa, which could adversely affect the Company’s
business, financial condition and results of operations. Such changes include changes in the laws and policies
that govern foreign investment in countries where the Company has operations, changes in consumer

19

purchasing habits including as to shopping channels, as well as, to a lesser extent, changes in U.S. laws and
regulations relating to foreign trade and investment.

The Company’s net sales outside of the U.S. for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
were approximately 42%, 41% and 41% of the Company’s total consolidated net sales, respectively.
Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates have affected the Company’s results of operations and the
value of its foreign assets in 2008, and may continue to affect the Company’s results of operations and the
value of its foreign assets, which in turn may adversely affect the Company’s reported net sales and earnings
and the comparability of period-to-period results of operations.

Products Corporation enters into foreign currency forward exchange contracts to hedge certain cash
flows denominated in foreign currency. The foreign currency forward exchange contracts are entered into
primarily for the purpose of hedging anticipated inventory purchases and certain intercompany payments
denominated in foreign currencies and generally have maturities of less than one year. At December 31,
2008, the notional amount of Products Corporation’s foreign currency forward exchange contracts was
$41.0 million. The foreign currency forward exchange contracts that Products Corporation enters into may
not adequately protect against foreign currency fluctuations.

Terrorist attacks, acts of war or military actions may adversely affect the markets in which the Company
operates and the Company’s business, financial condition and/or results of operations.

On September 11, 2001, the U.S. was the target of terrorist attacks of unprecedented scope. These
attacks contributed to major instability in the U.S. and other financial markets and reduced consumer
confidence. These terrorist attacks, as well as terrorist attacks such as those that have occurred in Madrid,
Spain and London, England, military responses to terrorist attacks and future developments, or other
military actions, such as the military actions in Iraq, may adversely affect prevailing economic conditions,
resulting in reduced consumer spending and reduced demand for the Company’s products. These devel-
opments subject the Company’s worldwide operations to increased risks and, depending on their magni-
tude, could reduce net sales and therefore could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business,
financial condition and/or results of operations.

The Company’s products are subject to federal, state and international regulations that could adversely
affect the Company’s business, financial condition and/or results of operations.

The Company is subject to regulation by the FTC and the FDA, in the U.S., as well as various other
federal, state, local and foreign regulatory authorities, including in the EU, Canada and other countries in
which the Company operates. The Company’s Oxford, North Carolina manufacturing facility is registered
with the FDA as a drug manufacturing establishment, permitting the manufacture of cosmetics that contain
over-the-counter drug ingredients, such as sunscreens and anti-perspirants. Regulations in the U.S., the EU,
Canada and in other countries in which the Company operates that are designed to protect consumers or
the environment have an increasing influence on the Company’s product claims, ingredients and packaging.
To the extent regulatory changes occur in the future, they could require the Company to reformulate or
discontinue certain of its products or revise its product packaging or labeling, any of which could result in,
among other things, increased costs to the Company, delays in product launches, product returns or recalls
and lower net sales, and therefore could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial
condition and/or results of operations.

Shares of Revlon, Inc. Class A Common Stock and Products Corporation’s capital stock are pledged to
secure various of Revlon, Inc.’s and/or other of the Company’s affiliates’ obligations and foreclosure upon
these shares or dispositions of shares could result in the acceleration of debt under the 2006 Credit
Agreements and could have other consequences.

All of Products Corporation’s shares of common stock are pledged to secure Revlon, Inc.’s guarantee
under the 2006 Credit Agreements. MacAndrews & Forbes has advised the Company that it has pledged
shares of Revlon, Inc.’s Class A Common Stock to secure certain obligations of MacAndrews & Forbes.
Additional shares of Revlon, Inc. and shares of common stock of intermediate holding companies between
Revlon, Inc. and MacAndrews & Forbes may from time to time be pledged to secure obligations of

20

MacAndrews & Forbes. A default under any of these obligations that are secured by the pledged shares
could cause a foreclosure with respect to such shares of Revlon, Inc.’s Class A Common Stock, Products
Corporation’s common stock or stock of intermediate holding companies.

A foreclosure upon any such shares of common stock or dispositions of shares of Revlon, Inc.’s Class A
Common Stock, Products Corporation’s common stock or stock of intermediate holding companies
beneficially owned by MacAndrews & Forbes could, in a sufficient amount, constitute a “change of
control” under the 2006 Credit Agreements, the MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan
Agreement and the indenture governing the 91⁄2% Senior Notes. A change of control constitutes an event of
default under the 2006 Credit Agreements, which would permit Products Corporation’s lenders to accel-
erate amounts outstanding under the 2006 Credit Facilities. In addition, holders of the 91⁄2% Senior Notes
may require Products Corporation to repurchase their respective notes under those circumstances. Upon a
change of control, Products Corporation would also be required, after fulfiling its repayment obligations
under the 91⁄2% Senior Notes indenture, to repay in full the MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated
Term Loan.

Products Corporation may not have sufficient funds at the time of any such change of control to repay
in full the borrowings under the 2006 Credit Facilities or to repurchase or redeem the 91⁄2% Senior Notes
and/or repay the MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan. (See “The Company’s ability to
service its debt and meet its cash requirements depends on many factors, including achieving anticipated
levels of revenue and expenses. If such revenue or expense levels prove to be other than as anticipated, the
Company may be unable to meet its cash requirements or Products Corporation may be unable to meet the
requirements of the financial covenants under the 2006 Credit Agreements, which could have a material
adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and/or results of operations”).

MacAndrews & Forbes has the power to direct and control the Company’s business.

MacAndrews & Forbes is wholly-owned by Ronald O. Perelman. Mr. Perelman, directly and through
MacAndrews & Forbes, beneficially owned, at December 31, 2008, approximately 61% of Revlon, Inc.’s
outstanding Class A and Class B Common Stock and controlled approximately 75% of the combined voting
power of the outstanding shares of Revlon, Inc.’s Class A and Class B Common Stock. As a result,
MacAndrews & Forbes is able to control the election of the entire Board of Directors of Revlon, Inc. and
Products Corporation (as it is a wholly owned subsidiary of Revlon, Inc.) and controls the vote on all
matters submitted to a vote of Revlon, Inc.’s and Products Corporation’s stockholders, including the
approval of mergers, consolidations, sales of some, all or substantially all of the Company’s assets, issuances
of capital stock and similar transactions.

Delaware law, provisions of the Company’s governing documents and the fact that the Company is a
controlled company could make a third-party acquisition of the Company difficult.

The Company is a Delaware corporation. The Delaware General Corporation Law contains provisions
that could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire control of the Company. MacAndrews & Forbes
controls the vote on all matters submitted to a vote of the Company’s stockholders, including the election of
the Company’s entire Board of Directors and approval of mergers, consolidations, sales of some, all or
substantially all of the Company’s assets, issuances of capital stock and similar transactions.

The Company’s certificate of incorporation makes available additional authorized shares of Class A
Common Stock for issuance from time to time at the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors
without further action by the Company’s stockholders, except where stockholder approval is required by
law or NYSE requirements. The Company’s certificate of incorporation also authorizes “blank check”
preferred stock, whereby the Company’s Board of Directors has the authority to issue shares of preferred
stock from time to time in one or more series and to fix the voting rights, if any, designations, powers,
preferences and the relative participation, optional or other rights, if any, and the qualifications, limitations
or restrictions, of any unissued series of preferred stock, to fix the number of shares constituting such series,
and to increase or decrease the number of shares of any such series (but not below the number of shares of
such series then outstanding).

21

This flexibility to authorize and issue additional shares may be utilized for a variety of corporate
purposes, including future public offerings to raise additional capital and corporate acquisitions. These
provisions, however, or MacAndrews & Forbes’ control of the Company, may be construed as having an
anti-takeover effect to the extent they would discourage or render more difficult an attempt to obtain
control of the Company by means of a proxy contest, tender offer, merger or otherwise, which could affect
the market price for the shares held by the Company’s stockholders.

Future sales or issuances of Common Stock or the Company’s issuance of other equity securities may
depress the Company’s stock price or dilute existing stockholders.

No prediction can be made as to the effect, if any, that future sales of Common Stock, or the availability
of Common Stock for future sales, will have on the market price of the Company’s Class A Common Stock.
Sales in the public market of substantial amounts of Common Stock, including shares held by MacAn-
drews & Forbes, or investor perception that such sales could occur, could adversely affect prevailing market
prices for the Company’s Class A Common Stock.

In addition, as stated above, the Company’s certificate of incorporation makes available additional
authorized shares of Common Stock for issuance from time to time at the discretion of the Company’s
Board of Directors without further action by the Company’s stockholders, except where stockholder
approval is required by law or NYSE requirements. The Company may also issue shares of “blank check”
preferred stock or securities convertible into either common stock or preferred stock. Any future issuance
of additional authorized shares of the Company’s Common Stock, preferred stock or securities convertible
into shares of the Company’s Common Stock or preferred stock may dilute the Company’s existing
stockholders’ equity interest in the Company. With respect to the Company’s Class A Common Stock, such
future issuances could, among other things, dilute the earnings per share of the Company’s Class A
Common Stock and the equity and voting rights of those stockholders holding the Company’s Class A
Common Stock at the time of such future issuances.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2. Properties

The following table sets forth, as of December 31, 2008, the Company’s major manufacturing, research

and warehouse/distribution facilities, all of which are owned except where otherwise noted.

Location

Use

Oxford, North Carolina . . Manufacturing, warehousing, distribution and

office(a)

Mississauga, Canada. . . . . Warehousing, distribution and office (leased)
Caracas, Venezuela. . . . . . Manufacturing, distribution and office
Canberra, Australia . . . . . Warehousing, distribution and office (leased)
Edison, New Jersey . . . . . Research and office (leased)
Rietfontein, South

Warehousing, distribution and office (leased)

Africa . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Isando, South Africa . . . . Manufacturing, warehousing, distribution and office
Stone, United Kingdom . . Warehousing and distribution (leased)

(a) Property subject to liens under the 2006 Credit Agreements.

22

Approximate
Floor Space Sq. Ft.

1,012,000

195,000
145,000
125,000
123,000
120,000

94,000
92,000

In addition to the facilities described above, the Company owns and leases additional facilities in
various areas throughout the world, including the lease for the Company’s executive offices in New York,
New York (approximately 76,500 square feet as of December 31, 2008). Management considers the
Company’s facilities to be well-maintained and satisfactory for the Company’s operations, and believes that
the Company’s facilities and third party contractual supplier arrangements provide sufficient capacity for its
current and expected production requirements.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

The Company is involved in various routine legal proceedings incident to the ordinary course of its
business. The Company believes that the outcome of all pending legal proceedings in the aggregate is
unlikely to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations and/or its
consolidated financial condition.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

None.

23

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases

of Equity Securities

MacAndrews & Forbes, which is wholly-owned by Ronald O. Perelman, at December 31, 2008
beneficially owned (i) 28,207,735 shares of Class A Common Stock, with a par value of $0.01 per share
(the “Class A Common Stock”) (20,166,143 shares of which were beneficially owned by MacAndrews &
Forbes, 7,718,092 shares of which were owned by a holding company in which each of Mr. Perelman and the
Ronald O. Perelman 2008 Trust owns 50% of the shares called RCH Holdings One Inc., 323,500 shares of
which were owned directly by Mr. Perelman and 4,561,610 shares of which were beneficially owned by a
family member of Mr. Perelman with respect to which shares MacAndrews & Forbes holds a voting proxy)
and (ii) all of the outstanding 3,125,000 shares of Revlon, Inc.’s Class B Common Stock, with a par value of
$0.01 per share (the “Class B Common Stock” and together with the Class A Common Stock, the “Common
Stock”).

Based on the shares referenced in clauses (i) and (ii) above, and including Mr. Perelman’s vested stock
options, Mr. Perelman, directly and indirectly, through MacAndrews & Forbes, at December 31, 2008,
beneficially owned approximately 59% of Revlon, Inc.’s Class A Common Stock, 100% of Revlon, Inc.’s
Class B Common Stock, together representing approximately 61% of Revlon, Inc.’s outstanding shares of
Common Stock and approximately 75% of the combined voting power of the outstanding shares of Revlon,
Inc.’s Common Stock. The remaining 20,042,428 shares of Class A Common Stock outstanding at Decem-
ber 31, 2008 were owned by the public.

Revlon, Inc.’s Class A Common Stock is listed and traded on the New York Stock Exchange (the
“NYSE”). As of December 31, 2008, there were 671 holders of record of Class A Common Stock (which
does not include the number of beneficial owners holding indirectly through a broker, bank or other
nominee). No cash dividends were declared or paid during 2008 by Revlon, Inc. on its Common Stock. The
terms of the 2006 Credit Agreements, the 91⁄2% Senior Notes indenture and the MacAndrews & Forbes
Senior Subordinated Term Loan Agreement currently restrict Products Corporation’s ability to pay
dividends or make distributions to Revlon, Inc., except in limited circumstances.

The table below shows the high and low quarterly stock prices of Revlon, Inc.’s Class A Common Stock
on the NYSE consolidated tape for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 (as adjusted for the
September 2008 1-for-10 Reverse Stock Split).

High . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Low. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$11.80
9.10

$9.90
8.00

$14.85
6.90

$13.58
6.02

Year Ended December 31, 2008(a)

1st Quarter

2nd Quarter

3rd Quarter

4th Quarter

High . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Low. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$14.90
10.50

$14.60
10.40

$13.80
10.30

$12.60
10.00

Year Ended December 31, 2007(a)

1st Quarter

2nd Quarter

3rd Quarter

4th Quarter

(a) Represents the closing price per share of Revlon, Inc.’s Class A Common Stock on the NYSE consolidated tape, as
adjusted for the September 2008 1-for-10 Reverse Stock Split. The Company’s stock trading symbol is “REV”.

For information on securities authorized for issuance under the Company’s equity compensation plans,

see “Item 12 — Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Related Stockholder Matters”.

24

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

The Consolidated Statements of Operations Data for each of the years in the five-year period ended
December 31, 2008 and the Balance Sheet Data as of December 31, 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005 and 2004 are
derived from the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been audited by an inde-
pendent registered public accounting firm. The Selected Consolidated Financial Data should be read in
conjunction with the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations”.

As Ceil (the Company’s indirect Brazilian subsidiary which was disposed of in July 2008) was classified
as a discontinued operation, effective in July 2008, the following amounts in the selected financial data for
the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005 and 2004 have been updated to give effect to the
Bozzano Sale Transaction. In addition, the following share and per share information included in the
selected financial data for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005 and 2004 have been
retroactively restated to give effect to the September 2008 1-for-10 Reverse Stock Split of Revlon, Inc.’s
Common Stock.

Statement of Operations Data:
Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Selling, general and administrative

expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Restructuring costs and other, net . . . . . .
Operating income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest Expense. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loss on early extinguishment of debt . . .
Income (loss) from continuing

operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income from discontinued operations . . .
Net income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Basic income (loss) per common share:

Continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Diluted income (loss) per common

share:
Continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Weighted average number of common
shares outstanding (in millions)(g):
Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Year Ended December 31,
(in millions, except per share amounts)
2007(b)
2005(d)
2006(c)

2004

2008(a)

$ 1,346.8
855.9

$ 1,367.1
861.4

$ 1,298.7
771.0

$ 1,303.5
810.5

$ 1,276.2
801.8

709.3
(8.4)
155.0
119.7
0.7

13.1
44.8
57.9

0.26
0.87
1.13

0.26
0.87
1.13

51.2

51.3

2008(a)

$

$

735.7
7.3
118.4
135.6
0.1

(19.0)
2.9
(16.1)

(0.38)
0.06
(0.32)

(0.38)
0.06
(0.32)

50.4

50.4

795.6
27.4
(52.0)
147.7
23.5

(252.1)
0.8
(251.3)

(6.04)
0.02
(6.03)

(6.04)
0.02
(6.03)

41.7

41.7

$

$

$

$

746.3
1.5
62.7
129.5
9.0(e)

(85.3)
1.6
(83.7)

(2.21)
0.04
(2.17)

(2.21)
0.04
(2.17)

38.6

38.6

$

$

Year Ended December 31,
(in millions)
2006(c)

2007(b)

2005(d)

710.1
5.8
85.9
130.6
90.7(f)

(152.3)
9.8
(142.5)

(4.87)
0.31
(4.56)

(4.87)
0.31
(4.56)

31.3

31.3

2004

$

$

Balance Sheet Data:
Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total indebtedness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total stockholders’ deficiency . . . . . . . . .

$

813.4
1,329.6
(1,112.8)

$

889.3
1,440.6
(1,082.0)

$

931.9
1,506.9
(1,229.8)

$ 1,043.7
1,418.4
(1,095.9)

$ 1,000.5
1,355.3
(1,019.9)

25

(a) Results for 2008 include a $5.9 million gain from the sale of a non-core trademark during the first quarter of 2008, and a
$4.3 million gain related to the sale of the Mexico facility (which is comprised of a $7.0 million gain on the sale, partially offset by
related restructuring charges of $1.1 million, $1.2 million of SG&A and cost of sales and $0.4 million of taxes). In addition, results
for 2008 also include restructuring charges of approximately $3.8 million, of which $0.8 million related to a restructuring in
Canada, $2.9 million related to the Company’s realignment of certain functions within customer business development,
information management and administrative services in the U.S. and $0.1 million related to other various restructurings. The
results of discontinued operations for 2008 included a one-time gain from the Bozzano Sale Transaction of $45.2 million.

(b) Results for 2007 include restructuring charges of approximately $4.4 million and $2.9 million in connection with restructurings
announced in 2006 (the “2006 Programs”) and in 2007 (the “2007 Programs”), respectively. The $4.4 million of restructuring
charges associated with the 2006 Programs were primarily for employee severance and other employee-related termination costs
principally relating to a broad organizational streamlining. The $2.9 million of restructuring charges associated with the 2007
Programs were primarily for employee severance and other employee-related termination costs relating principally to the
closure of the Company’s facility in Irvington, New Jersey and other employee-related termination costs relating to personnel
reductions in the Company’s information management function and its sales force in Canada.

(c) Results for 2006 include charges of $9.4 million in connection with the departure of Mr. Jack Stahl, the Company’s former
President and Chief Executive Officer, in September 2006 (including $6.2 million for severance and related costs and $3.2 million
for the accelerated amortization of Mr. Stahl’s unvested options and unvested restricted stock), $60.4 million in connection with
the discontinuance of the Vital Radiance brand and restructuring charges of approximately $27.6 million in connection with the
2006 Programs.

(d) Results for 2005 include expenses of approximately $44 million in incremental returns and allowances and approximately
$7 million in accelerated amortization cost of certain permanent displays related to the launch of Vital Radiance and the re-stage
of the Almay brand.

(e) The loss on early extinguishment of debt for 2005 includes: (i) a $5.0 million prepayment fee related to the prepayment in March
2005 of $100.0 million of indebtedness outstanding under the 2004 Term Loan Facility of the 2004 Credit Agreement with a
portion of the proceeds from the issuance of Products Corporation’s Original 91⁄2% Senior Notes (as defined in Note 9 “Long
Term Debt” to the Consolidated Financial Statements) and (ii) the aggregate $1.5 million loss on the redemption of all of
Products Corporation’s 81⁄8% Senior Notes and 9% Senior Notes (each as hereinafter defined) in April 2005, as well as the write-
off of the portion of deferred financing costs related to such prepaid amount.

(f) Represents the loss on the exchange of equity for certain indebtedness in the Revlon Exchange Transactions (as defined in Note 9
“Long Term Debt” to the Consolidated Financial Statements) and fees, expenses, premiums and the write-off of deferred
financing costs related to the Revlon Exchange Transactions, the tender for and redemption of all of Products Corporation’s
12% Senior Secured Notes due 2005 (including the applicable premium) and the repayment of Products Corporation’s 2001 bank
credit agreement.

(g) Represents the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. On March 25, 2004, in connection with
the Revlon Exchange Transactions, Revlon, Inc. issued 29,996,949 shares of Class A Common Stock (as adjusted for the
September 1-for-10 Reverse Stock Split). (See Note 9 “Long-Term Debt” to the Consolidated Financial Statements). The shares
issued in the Revlon Exchange Transactions are included in the weighted average number of shares outstanding since the date of
the respective transactions. In addition, upon consummation of Revlon, Inc.’s $110 Million Rights Offering in March 2006 (as
hereinafter defined), the fair value, based on NYSE closing price of Revlon, Inc.’s Class A Common Stock was more than the
subscription price. Accordingly, basic and diluted loss per common share have been restated for all periods prior to the $110
Million Rights Offering in March 2006 to reflect the stock dividend of 296,863 shares of Class A Common Stock (as adjusted for
the September 2008 1-for-10 Reverse Stock Split). In addition, upon consummation of Revlon, Inc.’s $100 Million Rights Offering
in January 2007 (as hereinafter defined), the fair value, based on NYSE closing price of Revlon, Inc.’s Class A Common Stock on
the consummation date was more than the subscription price. Accordingly, the basic and diluted loss per common share have
been restated for all prior periods prior to the $100 Million Rights Offering to reflect the implied stock dividend of
1,171,549 shares (as adjusted for the September 2008 1-for-10 Reverse Stock Split).

26

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Overview

Overview of the Business

The Company is providing this overview in accordance with the SEC’s December 2003 interpretive
guidance regarding Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.

Revlon, Inc. (and together with its subsidiaries, the “Company”) conducts its business exclusively
through its direct wholly-owned operating subsidiary, Revlon Consumer Products Corporation and its
subsidiaries (“Products Corporation”). Revlon, Inc. is a direct and indirect majority-owned subsidiary of
MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings Inc. (“MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings” and together with certain of its
affiliates other than the Company, “MacAndrews & Forbes”), a corporation wholly-owned by Ronald O.
Perelman.

The Company operates in a single segment and manufactures, markets and sells an extensive array of
cosmetics, women’s hair color, beauty tools, fragrances, skincare, anti-perspirants/deodorants and personal
care products. The Company is one of the world’s leading cosmetics companies in the mass retail channel.
The Company believes that its global brand name recognition, product quality and marketing experience
have enabled it to create one of the strongest consumer brand franchises in the world.

For additional information regarding our business, see “Part 1 — Business” of this Annual Report on

Form 10-K.

Overview of Sales and Earnings Results

Consolidated net sales in 2008 were $1,346.8 million, a decrease of $20.3 million, or 1.5%, compared to
$1,367.1 million in 2007. Foreign currency fluctuations negatively impacted net sales by $8.4 million, or 0.9%
excluding the impact of foreign currency fluctuations. Excluding foreign currency fluctuations, net sales of
Revlon brand color cosmetics increased 9% driven by increased new product introductions (with higher
shipments and lower product returns, partially offset by higher promotional allowances). Increased net
sales of Revlon brand color cosmetics were offset by declines in net sales of Almay brand color cosmetics
(with higher shipments of Almay brand color cosmetics offset by higher product returns and higher
promotional allowances for Almay brand color cosmetics), and lower net sales of certain fragrance and
beauty care brands.

In the United States, net sales in 2008 were $782.6 million, a decrease of $21.6 million, or 2.7%,
compared to $804.2 million in 2007. Higher net sales of Revlon brand color cosmetics were offset by lower
net sales of Almay brand color cosmetics, fragrance and beauty care products. In the fragrance and beauty
care categories, higher net sales of Revlon ColorSilk hair color and Revlon beauty tools in 2008 were offset
by lower net sales of Revlon Colorist hair color, Revlon Flair fragrance and Mitchum Smart Solid anti-
perspirant deodorant, which were launched in 2007.

In the Company’s international operations, net sales in 2008 were $564.2 million, an increase of
$1.3 million, or 0.2%, compared to $562.9 million in 2007. Excluding the unfavorable impact of foreign
currency fluctuations of $8.4 million, net sales in 2008 increased by 1.7% as a result of higher net sales of
Revlon and Almay brand color cosmetics, Revlon beauty tools and Mitchum anti-perspirant deodorant,
partially offset by lower net sales of fragrance and hair care products, compared to 2007. Higher net sales in
the Company’s Asia Pacific and Latin America regions were partially offset by lower net sales in the Europe
region.

Consolidated net income in 2008 was $57.9 million, as compared to a consolidated net loss of
$16.1 million in 2007. Consolidated net income in 2008 included a $45.2 million one-time gain from the
Bozzano Sale Transaction, which was included in net income from discontinued operations, and a loss from

27

discontinued operations of $0.4 million. The improvement in net income from continuing operations in
2008 compared to 2007 was primarily due to:

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

increased net sales of Revlon brand color cosmetics during 2008;

lower SG&A of $26.4 million, primarily driven by lower advertising costs in the 2008 period, since
the 2007 period included advertising costs associated with the launches of Revlon Colorist hair
color, Revlon Flair fragrance and Mitchum Smart Solid anti-perspirant deodorant, partially offset
by higher advertising costs in 2008 in support of Revlon brand color cosmetics;

lower interest expense of $15.9 million due to lower weighted average borrowing rates and lower
average debt levels;

a $5.9 million net gain from the sale of a non-core trademark during the first quarter of 2008;

a $4.3 million net gain related to the sale of the Mexico facility (which is comprised of a $7.0 million
gain on the sale, partially offset by related restructuring charges of $1.1 million, $1.2 million of
SG&A and cost of sales and $0.4 million of taxes); partially offset by

a $8.6 million increase in income taxes;

$6.9 million of lower foreign currency gains; and

$2.9 million of restructuring charges related to the Company’s realignment of certain functions
within customer business development, information management and administrative services.

Overview of AC Nielsen-measured U.S. Mass Retail Dollar Share

According to ACNielsen, the U.S. mass retail color cosmetics category grew 3.8% in 2008 compared to
2007. U.S. mass retail dollar share results, according to ACNielsen, for the Revlon and Almay color
cosmetics brands, and for Revlon ColorSilk hair color, Mitchum anti-perspirant/deodorant and Revlon
beauty tools for the year ended December 31, 2008, as compared to the year-ago period, are summarized in
the table below:

Revlon Brand Color Cosmetics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Almay Brand Color Cosmetics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Revlon ColorSilk Hair Color . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mitchum Anti-perspirant/Deodorant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Revlon Beauty Tools . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ Share%

2008

2007

12.7% 12.9%

5.9
8.2
5.0
18.8

6.0
7.8
5.5
23.7

Point
Change

(0.2)
(0.1)
0.4
(0.5)
(4.9)

All U.S. mass retail dollar share dollar volume and related data herein for the Company’s brands are
based upon retail sales in the U.S. mass retail channel, which are derived from ACNielsen data. ACNielsen
measures retail sales volume of products sold by retailers in the U.S. mass retail channel. Such data
represent ACNielsen’s estimates based upon samples of retail share data gathered by ACNielsen and are
therefore subject to some degree of variance and may contain slight rounding differences. ACNielsen’s data
does not reflect sales volume from Wal-Mart, Inc., which is the Company’s largest customer, representing
approximately 23% of the Company’s full year 2008 worldwide net sales, or sales volume from regional
mass volume retailers, prestige, department stores, television shopping, door-to-door, specialty stores,
internet, perfumeries or other distribution outlets, all of which are channels for cosmetics sales. From time
to time, ACNielsen adjusts its methodology for data collection and reporting, which may result in
adjustments to the categories and share data tracked by ACNielsen for both current and prior periods.

Overview of Financing Activities

In January 2008, Products Corporation entered into the MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated
Term Loan Agreement and on February 1, 2008 used the $170 million proceeds from such loan to repay in

28

full the $167.4 million remaining aggregate principal amount of Products Corporation’s 85⁄8% Senior
Subordinated Notes, which matured on February 1, 2008, and to pay $2.55 million of related fees and
expenses. In connection with such repayment, Products Corporation also used cash on hand to pay
$7.2 million of accrued and unpaid interest due on the 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes. (See “Financial
Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources — 2008 Repayment of the 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes
with the MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan” describing Products Corporation’s full
repayment of the balance of the 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes in February 2008).

In September 2008, Products Corporation used $63 million of the net proceeds from the Bozzano Sale
Transaction to partially repay $63 million of the outstanding aggregate principal amount of the MacAn-
drews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan. Following such partial repayment, there remained
outstanding $107 million in aggregate principal amount outstanding under the MacAndrews & Forbes
Senior Subordinated Term Loan.

In November 2008, Products Corporation extended the maturity date of the MacAndrews & Forbes
Senior Subordinated Term Loan from August 2009 to the earlier of (1) the date that Revlon, Inc. issues
equity with gross proceeds of at least $107 million, which proceeds would be contributed to Products
Corporation and used to repay the $107 million remaining aggregate principal balance of the MacAn-
drews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan, or (2) August 1, 2010.

Other Factors

The Company expects its results in 2009 will be impacted from increased pension expense due to a
significant decline in pension asset values in 2008, which began in late 2008, and may be further affected by
adverse foreign currency fluctuations and uncertain global economic conditions. However, the Company’s
objective is to maximize its business results in light of these conditions.

The Company expects pension and other post-retirement expenses (i.e., the net periodic benefit cost)
to be approximately $30 million to $35 million in 2009, compared to $7.4 million in 2008. In addition, the
Company expects cash contributions to its pension and other post-retirement benefit plans to be approx-
imately $25 million to $30 million in 2009, compared to $12.8 million in 2008. In addition, the Company
expects purchases of permanent wall displays and capital expenditures in 2009 to be approximately
$50 million and $20 million, respectively.

Results of Operations

Year ended December 31, 2008 compared with the year ended December 31, 2007

In the tables, all amounts in millions and numbers in parenthesis (

) denote unfavorable variances.

Net sales:

Consolidated net sales in 2008 were $1,346.8 million, a decrease of $20.3 million, or 1.5%, compared to
$1,367.1 million in 2007. Foreign currency fluctuations negatively impacted net sales by $8.4 million, or 0.9%
excluding the impact of foreign currency fluctuations. Excluding foreign currency fluctuations, net sales of
Revlon brand color cosmetics increased 9% driven by increased new product introductions (with higher
shipments and lower product returns, partially offset by higher promotional allowances). Increased net
sales of Revlon brand color cosmetics were offset by declines in net sales of Almay brand color cosmetics
(with higher shipments of Almay brand color cosmetics offset by higher product returns and higher

29

promotional allowances for Almay brand color cosmetics), and lower net sales of certain fragrance and
beauty care brands.

Year Ended December 31,

Change

2008

2007

$

%

XFX Change(1)
$
%

United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Asia Pacific . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Europe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Latin America . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total International . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total Company . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 782.6
265.0
200.8
98.4

$ 564.2

$1,346.8

$ 804.2
255.6
211.1
96.2

$ 562.9

$1,367.1

$(21.6)
9.4
(10.3)
2.2

$ 1.3

(2.7)% $(21.6)
17.2
3.7
(9.9)
(4.9)
2.3
2.3

(2.7)%
6.7
(4.7)
2.4

0.2% $ 9.6

1.7%

$(20.3)

(1.5)% $(12.0)

(0.9)%

(1) XFX excludes the impact of foreign currency fluctuations.

United States

In the United States, net sales in 2008 were $782.6 million, a decrease of $21.6 million, or 2.7%,
compared to $804.2 million in 2007. Higher net sales of Revlon brand color cosmetics were offset by lower
net sales of Almay brand color cosmetics, fragrance and beauty care products. In the fragrance and beauty
care categories, higher net sales of Revlon ColorSilk hair color and Revlon beauty tools in 2008 were offset
by lower net sales of Revlon Colorist hair color, Revlon Flair fragrance and Mitchum Smart Solid anti-
perspirant deodorant, which were launched in 2007.

International

In the Company’s international operations, net sales in 2008 were $564.2 million, an increase of
$1.3 million, or 0.2%, compared to $562.9 million in 2007. Excluding the unfavorable impact of foreign
currency fluctuations of $8.4 million, net sales in 2008 increased by 1.7% as a result of higher net sales of
Revlon and Almay brand color cosmetics, Revlon beauty tools and Mitchum anti-perspirant deodorant,
partially offset by lower net sales of fragrance and hair care products, compared to 2007. Higher net sales in
the Company’s Asia Pacific and Latin America regions in 2008, compared to 2007, were partially offset by
lower net sales in the Europe region.

In Asia Pacific, which is comprised of Asia Pacific and Africa, net sales increased 3.7%, or 6.7%
excluding the impact of foreign currency fluctuations, to $265.0 million compared to $255.6 million in 2007.
This growth in net sales was due primarily to higher shipments of Revlon color cosmetics throughout the
region and higher shipments of beauty care products and fragrances in South Africa (which together
contributed approximately 5.3 percentage points to the increase in the region’s net sales for 2008, as
compared with 2007).

In Europe, which is comprised of Europe, Canada and the Middle East, net sales decreased 4.9%, or
4.7% excluding the impact of foreign currency flutuations, to $200.8 million compared to $211.1 million in
2007. Lower shipments of fragrances and color cosmetics in the U.K., Italy and certain distributor markets
(which together contributed approximately 6.3 percentage points to the decrease in the region’s net sales in
2008, as compared with 2007) were partially offset by higher shipments of Revlon and Almay color
cosmetics in Canada (which offset by approximately 2.1 percentage points the decrease in the region’s net
sales in 2008, as compared with 2007).

In Latin America, which is comprised of Mexico, Central America and South America, net sales
increased 2.3%, or 2.4% excluding the impact of foreign currency fluctuations, to $98.4 million compared to
$96.2 million in 2007. The increase in net sales was primarily driven by higher net sales in Venezuela and
Argentina (which together contributed approximately 10.7 percentage points to the increase in the region’s
net sales in 2008, as compared with 2007), partially offset by lower shipments of beauty care products in
Mexico and lower shipments of fragrances and color cosmetics in certain distributor markets (which offset
by approximately 7.1 percentage points the Latin America region’s increase in net sales in 2008, as
compared with 2007).

30

Gross profit:

Year Ended December 31,

2008

2007

Change

Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Percentage of net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$855.9

$861.4

$(5.5)

63.5%

63.0%

0.5%

The 0.5 percentage point increase in gross profit as a percentage of net sales for 2008, compared to 2007,

was primarily due to:

•

changes in sales mix, which increased gross profit as a percentage of net sales by 0.4 percentage
points; and

• manufacturing costs, driven primarily by overhead and labor efficiencies, which increased gross

profit as a percentage of net sales by 0.3 percentage points.

SG&A expenses:

Year Ended December 31,

2008

2007

Change

SG&A expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$709.3

$735.7

$26.4

The decrease in SG&A expenses for 2008, as compared to 2007, was driven primarily by:

•

•

•

$39.1 million of lower advertising costs in the 2008 period since the 2007 period included adver-
tising costs associated with the launches of Revlon Colorist hair color, Revlon Flair fragrance and
Mitchum Smart Solid anti-perspirant deodorant, partially offset by $11.5 million of higher adver-
tising costs in 2008 in support of Revlon and Almay brand color cosmetics; and

$9.5 million of lower permanent display amortization expenses; partially offset by

a $4.4 million benefit in 2007 related to the reversal of a deferred rental liability upon exiting a
portion of the Company’s New York City headquarters leased space in 2007.

Restructuring costs:

Year Ended December 31,

Restructuring costs and other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$(8.4)

2008

2007

$7.3

Change

$15.7

During 2008, the Company recorded income of $8.4 million included in restructuring costs and other,
net, primarily due to a gain of $7.0 million related to the sale of its facility in Mexico and a net gain of
$5.9 million related to the sale of a non-core trademark. In addition, a $0.4 million favorable adjustment was
recorded to restructuring costs associated with the 2006 Programs, primarily due to the charges for
severance and other employee-related termination costs being slightly lower than originally estimated.
These were partially offset by a restructuring charge of $4.9 million for the 2008 Programs, of which
$0.8 million related to a restructuring in Canada, $1.1 million related to the Company’s decision to close and
sell its facility in Mexico, $2.9 million related to the Company’s realignment of certain functions within
customer business development, information management and administrative services in the U.S. and
$0.1 million related to other various restructurings. Of the net $4.9 million of charges related to the 2008
Programs, $4.7 million of which were cash charges, $1.7 million was paid out in 2008 and $3.0 million is
expected to be paid out by the end of 2009.

During 2007, the Company implemented the 2007 Programs, which consisted of the closure of the
Company’s Irvington facility and personnel reductions within the Company’s Information Management
(IM) function and the sales force in Canada, which actions were designed, for the IM function resources, to
better align the Company’s information management plan, and in Canada, to improve the allocation of
resources. Both actions resulted in reduced costs and an improvement in the Company’s operating profit
margins. In connection with the 2007 Programs, the Company incurred a total of approximately $2.9 million
of restructuring charges and other costs to implement these programs, consisting of approximately

31

$2.5 million of charges related to employee severance and other employee-related termination costs for the
2007 Programs and approximately $0.4 million of various other charges related to the closure of the
Irvington facility. The Company recorded all $2.9 million of the restructuring charges for the 2007 Programs
in 2007, all of which were cash charges. Of such charges, $2.3 million was paid out in 2007, $0.5 million was
paid out in 2008 and approximately $0.1 million is expected to be paid out through 2009. In addition, in 2007,
the Company recorded $4.4 million in restructuring expenses associated with the 2006 Programs for
vacating leased space, employee severance and other employee-related termination costs. (See Note 3
“Restructuring Costs and Other, Net” to the Consolidated Financial Statements regarding the 2006
Programs).

Other expenses (income):

Year Ended December 31,

2008

2007

Change

Interest expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$119.7

$135.6

$15.9

The decrease in interest expense for 2008, as compared to 2007, was due to lower weighted average
borrowing rates and lower average debt levels. (See Note 9 “Long-Term Debt” to the Consolidated
Financial Statements).

Provision for income taxes:

Provision for income taxes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$16.1

2008

2007

$7.5

Change

$(8.6)

Year Ended December 31,

The increase in the tax provision for 2008, as compared to 2007, was attributable to favorable tax
adjustments in 2007, which did not reoccur in 2008, as well as higher taxable income in certain jurisdictions
outside the U.S. in 2008 versus 2007. The 2007 tax provision benefited from a $5.9 million reduction in tax
liabilities due to the resolution of various international tax matters as a result of regulatory developments
and the reduction of a valuation allowance by $4.2 million.

Year ended December 31, 2007 compared with the year ended December 31, 2006

In the tables, all amounts in millions and numbers in parenthesis ( ) denote unfavorable variances.

Net sales:

Consolidated net sales in 2007 increased $68.4 million, or 5.3%, to $1,367.1, as compared with
$1,298.7 million in 2006. Excluding the favorable impact of foreign currency fluctuations, consolidated
net sales increased by $46.2 million, or 3.6%, in 2007. Net sales for 2006 were reduced by approximately
$20 million due to Vital Radiance, which was discontinued in September 2006.

Year Ended December 31,

2007

2006

Change

$

%

XFX Change(1)
$
%

United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Asia Pacific . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Europe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Latin America . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 804.2
255.6
211.1
96.2

Total International . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 562.9

Total Company . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$1,367.1

$ 764.9
237.7
204.2
91.9

$ 533.8

$1,298.7

$39.3
17.9
6.9
4.3

$29.1

$68.4

5.1% $39.3
11.7
7.5
(9.0)
3.4
4.2
4.7

5.5% $ 6.9

5.3% $46.2

5.1%
4.9
(4.4)
4.6

1.3%

3.6%

(1) XFX excludes the impact of foreign currency fluctuations.

32

United States

In the United States, net sales for 2007 increased by $39.3 million, or 5.1%, to $804.2 million, from
$764.9 million in 2006. Net sales in the U.S. for 2006 were reduced by approximately $20 million due to Vital
Radiance. Excluding the impact of Vital Radiance, the increase in net sales in 2007 compared to 2006 was
due to higher shipments of beauty care products, primarily women’s hair color, and Almay color cosmetics,
partially offset by lower shipments of Revlon color cosmetics in 2007.

International

In the Company’s international operations, foreign currency fluctuations favorably impacted net sales
in 2007 by $22.2 million. Excluding the impact of foreign currency fluctuations, the $6.9 million increase in
net sales in 2007 in the Company’s international operations, as compared with 2006, was driven primarily by
higher shipments in the Asia Pacific region, partially offset by lower shipments in the Europe region,
particularly in Canada. Net sales in Canada in 2006 were positively impacted by certain promotional
programs in color cosmetics and the restage of Almay color cosmetics.

In Asia Pacific, which is comprised of Asia Pacific and Africa, the increase in net sales, excluding the
favorable impact of foreign currency fluctuations, was due primarily to higher shipments in South Africa,
and to a lesser extent, Australia and certain distributor markets and lower returns expense in Japan (which
together contributed approximately 6.4 percentage points to the increase in net sales for the region in 2007,
as compared with 2006). This increase was partially offset by lower shipments in Hong Kong and Taiwan
(which together offset by approximately 1.4 percentage points the increase in net sales for the region for
2007, as compared with 2006). The higher shipments in South Africa were driven primarily by growth in
color cosmetics and beauty care products. The higher shipments in Australia were driven primarily by
growth in color cosmetics. The lower shipments in Hong Kong and Taiwan were driven primarily by a
decline in color cosmetics.

In Europe, which is comprised of Europe, Canada and the Middle East, the decrease in net sales,
excluding the favorable impact of foreign currency fluctuations, was due primarily to lower shipments of
color cosmetics and beauty care products in Canada, partially offset by higher shipments of beauty tools.
The decline in color cosmetics in Canada was due primarily to the favorable impact on 2006 net sales of
promotions in color cosmetics, partially offset by lower returns and allowances of color cosmetics resulting
from lower promotional sales in 2007. The net sales decline in Canada contributed approximately 4.0 per-
centage points to the decrease in net sales for the region for 2007, as compared with 2006.

In Latin America, which is comprised of Mexico, Central America and South America, the increase in
net sales, excluding the favorable impact of foreign currency fluctuations, was driven primarily by higher
shipments in Venezuela and, to a lesser extent, Argentina (which together contributed approximately
12.6 percentage points to the increase in net sales for the region in 2007, as compared with 2006). This
increase was substantially offset by a net sales decline in Chile resulting from the move of the Chile
subsidiary business to a distributor model during 2007 (which together offset approximately 4.1 percentage
points of the increase in net sales for the region in 2007, as compared with 2006). The higher shipments in
Venezuela and Argentina were driven primarily by growth in color cosmetics and beauty care products.

Gross profit:

Year Ended December 31,

2007

2006

Change

Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Percentage of net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$861.4

$771.0

$90.4

63.0%

59.4%

3.6%

The 3.6 percentage point increase in gross profit for 2007 compared to 2006 was primarily due to:

•

lower estimated excess inventory charges in 2007 compared to 2006 resulting from estimated excess
inventory charges in 2006 related to the Vital Radiance, Almay and Revlon brands, which increased
gross profit as a percentage of net sales by 2.4 percentage points; and

33

• higher net sales including the impact of approximately $64.4 million of charges for estimated
returns and allowances recorded in 2006 related to the Vital Radiance brand (which was discon-
tinued in September 2006), which increased gross profit as a percentage of net sales by 2.0 per-
centage points, partially offset by unfavorable changes in sales mix and lower production volume in
2007.

SG&A expenses:

Year Ended December 31,

2007

2006

Change

SG&A expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$735.7

$795.6

$59.9

The decrease in SG&A expenses for 2007 compared to 2006 was driven primarily by:

•

•

•

•

approximately $25.9 million of lower general and administrative expenses, primarily related to the
impact of the Company’s 2006 and 2007 organizational realignment and streamlining activities,
which resulted in lower personnel-related expenses and occupancy expenses. Occupancy expenses
were lower by $8.1 million in 2007 versus 2006, primarily related to the Company’s exit of a portion
of its New York City headquarters leased space, including a benefit of $4.4 million related to the
reversal of a deferred rental liability upon exit of the space in the first quarter of 2007;

approximately $15.2 million of lower display amortization expenses in 2007 compared to 2006,
which included $8.9 million of charges related to the accelerated amortization and write-off of
certain displays in connection with the discontinuance of the Vital Radiance brand, as well as
additional display amortization costs in 2006 of $8.3 million related to the Vital Radiance brand
prior to its discontinuance in September 2006;

approximately $10.9 million of lower advertising costs in 2007 compared to 2006, including
advertising costs of $36.4 million for the Vital Radiance brand in 2006, partially offset by higher
advertising spending in 2007 on the Company’s core brands; and

$9.4 million of severance and accelerated charges recorded in 2006 related to unvested options and
unvested restricted stock in connection with the termination of the former CEO’s employment in
September 2006.

Restructuring costs:

Restructuring costs and other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Year Ended December 31,

2007

$7.3

2006

$27.4

Change

$20.1

In 2007, the Company recorded $7.3 million in restructuring expenses for vacating leased space,
employee severance and other employee-related termination costs. (See Note 3,“Restructuring Costs and
Other, Net” to the Consolidated Financial Statements regarding the 2007 Programs). In 2006, the Company
recorded $27.4 million in restructuring expenses for employee severance and employee-related termination
costs related to the 2006 Programs.

During 2007, the Company implemented the 2007 Programs, which consisted of the closure of the
Company’s Irvington facility and personnel reductions within the Company’s Information Management
(IM) function and the sales force in Canada, which actions were designed, for the IM function resources, to
better align the Company’s information management plan, and in Canada, to improve the allocation of
resources. Both actions resulted in reduced costs and an improvement in the Company’s operating profit
margins. In connection with the 2007 Programs, the Company incurred a total of approximately $2.9 million
of restructuring charges and other costs to implement these programs, consisting of approximately
$2.5 million of charges related to employee severance and other employee-related termination costs for
the 2007 Programs and approximately $0.4 million of various other charges related to the closure of the
Irvington facility. The Company recorded all $2.9 million of the restructuring charges for the 2007 Programs

34

in 2007, all of which were cash charges. Of such charges, $2.3 million was paid out in 2007 and approximately
$0.6 million is expected to be paid out through 2009.

In connection with the 2006 Programs, the Company recorded charges of approximately $32.9 million
in 2006 and $5.0 million in 2007, respectively. Of the total $37.9 million of charges related to the 2006
Programs, approximately $30.6 million are expected to be paid in cash, of which approximately $10.4 million
was paid out in 2006, $16.2 million was paid out in 2007 and approximately $4.0 million is expected to be
paid out through 2009. As part of the 2006 Programs, the Company agreed in December 2006 to cancel its
lease and modify the sublease of its New York City headquarters space, including vacating 23,000 square
feet in December 2006 and vacating an additional 77,300 square feet in February 2007. These space
reductions are resulting in savings in rental and related expense, while allowing the Company to maintain its
corporate offices in a smaller, more efficient space, reflecting its streamlined organization.

Other expenses (income):

Year Ended December 31,

2007

2006

Change

Interest expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$135.6

$147.7

$12.1

The decrease in interest expenses for 2007 compared to 2006 was primarily due to lower average
borrowing rates on comparable debt levels (See Note 9 “Long-Term Debt” to the Consolidated Financial
Statements).

Loss on early extinguishment of debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Year Ended December 31,

2007

$0.1

2006

$23.5

Change

$23.4

For 2007, the loss on early extinguishment of debt represents the loss on the redemption in February
2007 of approximately $50 million in aggregate principal amount of Products Corporation’s 85⁄8% Senior
Subordinated Notes using a portion of the net proceeds of the $100 Million Rights Offering completed in
January 2007 (See “Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources — 2008 Repayment of the
85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes with the MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan”
describing Products Corporation’s full repayment of the balance of the 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes
in February 2008). In 2006, the loss on early extinguishment of debt represents the loss on the redemption in
April 2006 of approximately $110 million in aggregate principal amount of Products Corporation’s
85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes using the net proceeds of the $110 Million Rights Offering completed
in March 2006.

Miscellaneous (income) expense, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$(0.4)

2007

2006

$3.9

Change

$4.3

In 2006, the Company incurred fees and expenses associated with the various amendments to Products
Corporation’s 2004 Credit Agreement. See Note 9 “Long-Term Debt — Other Transactions under the 2004
Credit Agreement Prior to Its Complete Refinancing in December 2006” to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.

Year Ended December 31,

Provision for income taxes:

Provision for income taxes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Year Ended December 31,

2007

$7.5

2006

$20.1

Change

$12.6

The decrease in the provision for income taxes in 2007, as compared with 2006, was primarily
attributable to the 2007 tax provision benefitting from a $5.9 million reduction in tax liabilities due to
the resolution of various international tax matters as a result of regulatory developments and the reduction
of a valuation allowance by $4.2 million, which together offset the effect of higher taxable income in 2007 in
certain foreign jurisdictions.

35

Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities was $33.1 million, $0.3 million and $(139.7) million
for 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The improvement in 2008 compared to 2007 was primarily due to net
income of $57.9 million in 2008, as compared to a net loss in 2007 of $16.1 million, and the positive cash
impact of changes in working capital. The improvement in 2007 compared to 2006 was primarily due to
lower net loss and decreased purchases of permanent displays, partially offset by the cash impact of changes
in net working capital, including cash used for product return settlements in 2007 related to the September
2006 discontinuance of Vital Radiance and lower trade receivables.

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities was $100.5 million, $(17.4) million and $(22.1) million
for 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Capital expenditures were $20.7 million, $19.8 million and $22.1 mil-
lion in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Net cash provided by investing activities in 2008 included
$107.6 million in gross proceeds from the Bozzano Sale Transaction (see Note 2,“Discontinued Operations”
to the Consolidated Financial Statements) and $13.6 million in proceeds from the sale of a non-core
trademark and certain other assets (which included net proceeds as a result of the sale of the Mexico
facility).

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities was $(111.9) million, $29.1 million and $162.9 million
for 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Net cash used in financing activities for 2008 included the full
repayment on February 1, 2008 of the $167.4 million remaining aggregate principal amount of Products
Corporation’s 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes, which matured on February 1, 2008, and $43.5 million of
repayments under the 2006 Revloving Credit Facility, offset by proceeds of $170.0 million from the
MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan Agreement, which Products Corporation used
to repay in full such 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes on their February 1, 2008 maturity date, and to pay
$2.55 million of related fees and expenses. In addition, in September 2008, the Company used $63.0 million
of the net proceeds from the Bozzano Sale Transaction to repay $63.0 million in aggregate principal amount
of the MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan, leaving $107 million in aggregate principal
amount remaining outstanding under such loan.

Net cash provided by financing activities for 2007 included net proceeds of $98.9 million from Revlon,
Inc.’s issuance of Class A Common Stock as a result of the closing of the $100 Million Rights Offering in
January 2007. Revlon, Inc.’s proceeds from the $100 Million Rights Offering were promptly transferred to
Products Corporation, which it used in February 2007 to redeem $50.0 million aggregate principal amount
of its 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes at an aggregate redemption price of $50.3 million, including
$0.3 million of accrued and unpaid interest up to, but not including, the redemption date. The remainder of
such proceeds was used to repay approximately $43.3 million of indebtedness outstanding under Products
Corporation’s 2006 Revolving Credit Facility, without any permanent reduction of that commitment, after
incurring fees and expenses of approximately $1.1 million incurred in connection with the $100 Million
Rights Offering, with approximately $5 million of the remaining proceeds then being available for general
corporate purposes.

Net cash provided by financing activities for 2006 included net proceeds of $107.2 million from Revlon,
Inc.’s issuance in March 2006 of Class A Common Stock in the $110 Million Rights Offering, borrowings
during the second and third quarter of 2006 under the 2004 Multi-Currency Facility (as hereinafter defined)
under the 2004 Credit Agreement, $100.0 million from borrowings under the Term Loan Add-on (as
hereinafter defined) under the 2004 Credit Agreement and $840.0 million from borrowings under the 2006
Term Loan Facility.

The net proceeds from the $110 Million Rights Offering were promptly transferred to Products
Corporation, which it used in April 2006, together with available cash, to redeem $109.7 million aggregate
principal amount of its 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes at an aggregate redemption price of $111.8 million,
including $2.1 million of accrued and unpaid interest up to, but not including, the redemption date and to
pay related financing costs of $9.4 million (the balance of which was repaid in full in February 2008 — See
“Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources — 2008 Repayment of the 85⁄8% Senior Subordi-
nated Notes with the MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan”). Products Corporation

36

used the proceeds from the $100.0 million Term Loan Add-on to repay in July 2006 $78.6 million of
outstanding indebtedness under the 2004 Multi-Currency Facility under Products Corporation’s 2004
Credit Agreement, without any permanent reduction in the commitment under that facility, and the
balance of $11.7 million, after the payment of fees and expenses incurred in connection with consummating
such transaction, was used for general corporate purposes. Products Corporation used the proceeds from
the $840.0 million 2006 Term Loan Facility to repay in December 2006 approximately $798.0 million of
outstanding indebtedness under the 2004 Term Loan Facility, repay approximately $13.3 million of
indebtedness outstanding under the 2006 Revolving Credit Facility and pay approximately $15.3 million
of accrued interest and a $8.0 million prepayment fee.

At January 31, 2009, Products Corporation had a liquidity position of approximately $184.0 million,
consisting of cash and cash equivalents (net of any outstanding checks) of approximately $55.1 million, as
well as approximately $128.9 million in available borrowings under the 2006 Revolving Credit Facility.

December 2006 — Credit Agreement Refinancing

In December 2006, Products Corporation refinanced its 2004 Credit Agreement (as hereinafter
defined), and, among other things, reduced its interest rates and extended the maturity dates for its bank
credit facilities from July 9, 2009 to January 15, 2012 in the case of the 2006 Revolving Credit Facility and
from July 9, 2010 to January 15, 2012 in the case of the 2006 Term Loan Facility (as hereinafter defined).

In July 2004, Products Corporation entered into a credit agreement (the “2004 Credit Agreement”)
with certain of its subsidiaries as local borrowing subsidiaries, a syndicate of lenders, Citicorp USA, Inc., as
multi-currency administrative agent, term loan administrative agent and collateral agent, UBS Securities
LLC as syndication agent and Citigroup Global Markets Inc. as sole lead arranger and sole bookrunner.

The 2004 Credit Agreement originally provided up to $960.0 million and consisted of a term loan
facility of $800.0 million (the “2004 Term Loan Facility”) and a $160.0 million multi-currency revolving
credit facility, the availability under which varied based upon the borrowing base that was determined based
upon the value of eligible accounts receivable and eligible inventory in the U.S. and the U.K. and eligible
real property and equipment in the U.S. from time to time (the “2004 Multi-Currency Facility”).

As part of the December 2006 refinancing of the 2004 Credit Agreement, Products Corporation
replaced the $800 million 2004 Term Loan Facility under its 2004 Credit Agreement with a 5-year, term loan
facility (the “2006 Term Loan Facility”) in an original aggregate principal amount of $840 million pursuant
to a term loan agreement, dated as of December 20, 2006, among Products Corporation, as borrower, the
lenders party thereto, Citicorp USA, Inc., as administrative agent and collateral agent, Citigroup Global
Markets Inc., as sole lead arranger and sole bookrunner, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as syndication
agent (with the agreement governing the 2006 Term Loan Facility being the “2006 Term Loan Agree-
ment”). At January 31, 2009 the aggregate principal amount outstanding under the 2006 Term Loan Facility
was $831.6 million due to regularly scheduled amortization payments. (See “Recent Developments”).

As part of this December 2006 bank refinancing, Products Corporation also amended and restated the
2004 Multi-Currency Facility by entering into a $160.0 million 2006 revolving credit agreement (the “2006
Revolving Credit Agreement”, and together with the 2006 Term Loan Agreement, the “2006 Credit
Agreements”) that amended and restated the 2004 Credit Agreement (with such revolving credit facility
being the “2006 Revolving Credit Facility” and, together with the 2006 Term Loan Facility, the “2006 Credit
Facilities”). At January 31, 2009, availability under the $160.0 million 2006 Revolving Credit Facility, based
upon the calculated borrowing base less approximately $13.1 million of outstanding letters of credit and nil
then drawn on the 2006 Revolving Credit Facility, was approximately $128.9 million.

Availability under the 2006 Revolving Credit Facility varies based on a borrowing base that is
determined by the value of eligible accounts receivable and eligible inventory in the U.S. and the U.K.
and eligible real property and equipment in the U.S. from time to time.

37

In each case subject to borrowing base availability, the 2006 Revolving Credit Facility is available to:

(i)

Products Corporation in revolving credit loans denominated in U.S. dollars;

(ii) Products Corporation in swing line loans denominated in U.S. dollars up to $30 million;

(iii) Products Corporation in standby and commercial letters of credit denominated in U.S. dollars

and other currencies up to $60 million; and

(iv) Products Corporation and certain of its international subsidiaries designated from time to time in
revolving credit loans and bankers’ acceptances denominated in U.S. dollars and other
currencies.

If the value of the eligible assets is not sufficient to support a $160 million borrowing base under the
2006 Revolving Credit Facility, Products Corporation will not have full access to the 2006 Revolving Credit
Facility. Products Corporation’s ability to make borrowings under the 2006 Revolving Credit Facility is also
conditioned upon the satisfaction of certain conditions precedent and Products Corporation’s compliance
with other covenants in the 2006 Revolving Credit Facility, including a fixed charge coverage ratio that
applies if and when the excess borrowing base (representing the difference between (1) the borrowing base
under the 2006 Revolving Credit Facility and (2) the amounts outstanding under the 2006 Revolving Credit
Facility) is less than $20.0 million.

Borrowings under the 2006 Revolving Credit Facility (other than loans in foreign currencies) bear
interest at a rate equal to, at Products Corporation’s option, either (i) the Eurodollar Rate plus 2.00% per
annum or (ii) the Alternate Base Rate plus 1.00% per annum. Loans in foreign currencies bear interest in
certain limited circumstances, or if mutually acceptable to Products Corporation and the relevant foreign
lenders, at the Local Rate, and otherwise at the Eurocurrency Rate, in each case plus 2.00%. At
December 31, 2008, there were no borrowings under the 2006 Revolving Credit Facility.

Under the 2006 Term Loan Facility, Eurodollar Loans bear interest at the Eurodollar Rate plus 4.00%
per annum and Alternate Base Rate loans bear interest at the Alternate Base Rate plus 3.00% per annum.
At December 31, 2008, the effective weighted average interest rate for borrowings under the 2006 Term
Loan Facility was 6.42%. (See “Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resouces — Interest Rate Swap
Transactions”).

The 2006 Credit Facilities are supported by, among other things, guarantees from Revlon, Inc. and,
subject to certain limited exceptions, the domestic subsidiaries of Products Corporation. The obligations of
Products Corporation under the 2006 Credit Facilities and the obligations under the guarantees are secured
by, subject to certain limited exceptions, substantially all of the assets of Products Corporation and the
subsidiary guarantors, including:

(i) mortgages on owned real property, including Products Corporation’s facility in Oxford, North

Carolina and property in Irvington, New Jersey;

(ii)

(iii)

(iv)

the capital stock of Products Corporation and the subsidiary guarantors and 66% of the capital
stock of Products Corporation’s and the subsidiary guarantors’ first-tier foreign subsidiaries;

intellectual property and other intangible property of Products Corporation and the subsidiary
guarantors; and

inventory, accounts receivable, equipment, investment property and deposit accounts of Prod-
ucts Corporation and the subsidiary guarantors.

The liens on, among other things, inventory, accounts receivable, deposit accounts, investment prop-
erty (other than the capital stock of Products Corporation and its subsidiaries), real property, equipment,
fixtures and certain intangible property related thereto secure the 2006 Revolving Credit Facility on a first
priority basis and the 2006 Term Loan Facility on a second priority basis. The liens on the capital stock of
Products Corporation and its subsidiaries and intellectual property and certain other intangible property
secure the 2006 Term Loan Facility on a first priority basis and the 2006 Revolving Credit Facility on a

38

second priority basis. Such arrangements are set forth in the Amended and Restated Intercreditor and
Collateral Agency Agreement, dated as of December 20, 2006, by and among Products Corporation and the
lenders (the “2006 Intercreditor Agreement”). The 2006 Intercreditor Agreement also provides that the
liens referred to above may be shared from time to time, subject to certain limitations, with specified types
of other obligations incurred or guaranteed by Products Corporation, such as foreign exchange and interest
rate hedging obligations (including the Interest Rate Swaps that Products Corporation entered into in
September 2007 and April 2008 in connection with indebtedness outstanding under the 2006 Term Loan
Facility — See “Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources — Interest Rate Swap Transactions”)
and foreign working capital lines.

Each of the 2006 Credit Facilities contains various restrictive covenants prohibiting Products Corpo-

ration and its subsidiaries from:

(i)

incurring additional indebtedness or guarantees, with certain exceptions;

(ii) making dividend and other payments or loans to Revlon, Inc. or other affiliates, with certain

exceptions, including among others,

(a) exceptions permitting Products Corporation to pay dividends or make other payments to
Revlon, Inc. to enable it to, among other things, pay expenses incidental to being a public
holding company, including, among other things, professional fees such as legal, accounting
and insurance fees, regulatory fees, such as SEC filing fees, NYSE listing fees and other
expenses related to being a public holding company,

(b) subject to certain circumstances, to finance the purchase by Revlon, Inc. of its Class A
Common Stock in connection with the delivery of such Class A Common Stock to grantees
under the Stock Plan (as hereinafter defined) and/or the payment of withholding taxes in
connection with the vesting of restricted stock awards under such plan, and

(c)

subject to certain limitations, to pay dividends or make other payments to finance the
purchase, redemption or other retirement for value by Revlon, Inc. of stock or other equity
interests or equivalents in Revlon, Inc. held by any current or former director, employee or
consultant in his or her capacity as such;

(iii) creating liens or other encumbrances on Products Corporation’s or its subsidiaries’ assets or
revenues, granting negative pledges or selling or transferring any of Products Corporation’s or its
subsidiaries’ assets, all subject to certain limited exceptions;

(iv) with certain exceptions, engaging in merger or acquisition transactions;

(v)

prepaying indebtedness and modifying the terms of certain indebtedness and specified material
contractual obligations, subject to certain exceptions;

(vi) making investments, subject to certain exceptions; and

(vii) entering into transactions with affiliates of Products Corporation other than upon terms no less
favorable to Products Corporation or its subsidiaries than it would obtain in an arms’ length
transaction.

In addition to the foregoing, the 2006 Term Loan Facility contains a financial covenant limiting
Products Corporation’s senior secured leverage ratio (the ratio of Products Corporation’s Senior Secured
Debt (excluding debt outstanding under the 2006 Revolving Credit Facility) to EBITDA, as each such term
is defined in the 2006 Term Loan Facility) to 5.0 to 1.0 for each period of four consecutive fiscal quarters
ending during the period from December 31, 2008 to the January 2012 maturity date of the 2006 Term Loan
Facility.

Under certain circumstances if and when the difference between (i) the borrowing base under the 2006
Revolving Credit Facility and (ii) the amounts outstanding under the 2006 Revolving Credit Facility is less
than $20.0 million for a period of 30 consecutive days or more, the 2006 Revolving Credit Facility requires

39

Products Corporation to maintain a consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio (the ratio of EBITDA minus
Capital Expenditures to Cash Interest Expense for such period, as each such term is defined in the 2006
Revolving Credit Facility) of 1.0 to 1.0.

The events of default under each 2006 Credit Facility include customary events of default for such

types of agreements, including:

(i)

(ii)

(iii)

(iv)

(v)

(vi)

(vii)

nonpayment of any principal, interest or other fees when due, subject in the case of interest and
fees to a grace period;

non-compliance with the covenants in such 2006 Credit Facility or the ancillary security
documents, subject in certain instances to grace periods;

the institution of any bankruptcy, insolvency or similar proceedings by or against Products
Corporation, any of Products Corporation’s subsidiaries or Revlon, Inc., subject in certain
instances to grace periods;

default by Revlon, Inc. or any of its subsidiaries (A) in the payment of certain indebtedness
when due (whether at maturity or by acceleration) in excess of $5.0 million in aggregate
principal amount or (B) in the observance or performance of any other agreement or condition
relating to such debt, provided that the amount of debt involved is in excess of $5.0 million in
aggregate principal amount, or the occurrence of any other event, the effect of which default
referred to in this subclause (iv) is to cause or permit the holders of such debt to cause the
acceleration of payment of such debt;

in the case of the 2006 Term Loan Facility, a cross default under the 2006 Revolving Credit
Facility, and in the case of the 2006 Revolving Credit Facility, a cross default under the 2006
Term Loan Facility;

the failure by Products Corporation, certain of Products Corporation’s subsidiaries or Revlon,
Inc., to pay certain material judgments;

a change of control such that (A) Revlon, Inc. shall cease to be the beneficial and record owner
of 100% of Products Corporation’s capital stock, (B) Ronald O. Perelman (or his estate, heirs,
executors, administrator or other personal representative) and his or their controlled affiliates
shall cease to “control” Products Corporation, and any other person or group of persons owns,
directly or indirectly, more than 35% of the total voting power of Products Corporation, (C) any
person or group of persons other than Ronald O. Perelman (or his estate, heirs, executors,
administrator or other personal representative) and his or their controlled affiliates shall
“control” Products Corporation or (D) during any period of two consecutive years, the directors
serving on Products Corporation’s Board of Directors at the beginning of such period (or other
directors nominated by at least 662⁄3% of such continuing directors) shall cease to be a majority
of the directors;

(viii)

the failure by Revlon, Inc. to contribute to Products Corporation all of the net proceeds it
receives from any sale of its equity securities or Products Corporation’s capital stock, subject to
certain limited exceptions;

(ix)

(x)

the failure of any of Products Corporation’s, its subsidiaries’ or Revlon, Inc.’s representations or
warranties in any of the documents entered into in connection with the 2006 Credit Facility to be
correct, true and not misleading in all material respects when made or confirmed;

the conduct by Revlon, Inc. of any meaningful business activities other than those that are
customary for a publicly traded holding company which is not itself an operating company,
including the ownership of meaningful assets (other than Products Corporation’s capital stock)
or the incurrence of debt, in each case subject to limited exceptions;

(xi)

any M&F Lenders’ failure to fund any binding commitments by such M&F Lender under any
agreement governing certain loans from the M&F Lenders (excluding the MacAndrews &

40

Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan which was fully funded by MacAndrews & Forbes in
February 2008); and

(xii)

the failure of certain of Products Corporation’s affiliates which hold Products Corporation’s or
its subsidiaries’ indebtedness to be party to a valid and enforceable agreement prohibiting such
affiliate from demanding or retaining payments in respect of such indebtedness.

If Products Corporation is in default under the senior secured leverage ratio under the 2006 Term Loan
Facility or the consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio under the 2006 Revolving Credit Facility, Products
Corporation may cure such default by issuing certain equity securities to, or receiving capital contributions
from, Revlon, Inc. and applying the cash therefrom which is deemed to increase EBITDA for the purpose of
calculating the applicable ratio. This cure right may be exercised by Products Corporation two times in any
four quarter period. Products Corporation was in compliance with all applicable covenants under the 2006
Credit Agreements as of December 31, 2008.

2006 and 2007 Rights Offerings

March 2006 — $110 Million Rights Offering

In March 2006, Revlon, Inc. completed a $110 million rights offering of Revlon, Inc.’s Class A Common
Stock (including the related private placement to MacAndrews & Forbes, the “$110 Million Rights
Offering”), which allowed each stockholder of record of Revlon, Inc.’s Class A and Class B Common
Stock as of the close of business on February 13, 2006, the record date set by Revlon, Inc.’s Board of
Directors, to purchase additional shares of Class A Common Stock. The subscription price for each share of
Class A Common Stock purchased in the $110 Million Rights Offering, including shares purchased in the
private placement by MacAndrews & Forbes, was $28.00 per share (as adjusted for the September 2008
1-for-10 Reverse Stock Split).

Upon completing the $110 Million Rights Offering, Revlon, Inc. promptly transferred the net proceeds
to Products Corporation, which it used to redeem $109.7 million aggregate principal amount of its
85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes in satisfaction of the applicable requirements under the 2004 Credit
Agreement, at an aggregate redemption price of $111.8 million, including $2.1 million of accrued and
unpaid interest up to, but not including, the redemption date. (See “Financial Condition, Liquidity and
Capital Resources — 2008 Repayment of the 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes with the MacAndrews &
Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan” regarding Products Corporation’s full repayment of the balance of
the 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes upon maturity on February 1, 2008).

In completing the $110 Million Rights Offering, Revlon, Inc. issued an additional 3,928,571 shares of its
Class A Common Stock (as adjusted for the September 2008 1-for-10 Reverse Stock Split), including
1,588,566 shares subscribed for by public shareholders (other than MacAndrews & Forbes) and
2,340,005 shares issued to MacAndrews & Forbes in a private placement directly from Revlon, Inc.
pursuant to a Stock Purchase Agreement between Revlon, Inc. and MacAndrews & Forbes, dated as of
February 17, 2006. The shares issued to MacAndrews & Forbes represented the number of shares of Revlon,
Inc.’s Class A Common Stock that MacAndrews & Forbes would otherwise have been entitled to purchase
pursuant to its basic subscription privilege in the $110 Million Rights Offering (which was approximately
60% of the shares of Revlon, Inc.’s Class A Common Stock offered in the $110 Million Rights Offering).

January 2007 — $100 Million Rights Offering

In January 2007, Revlon, Inc. completed a $100 million rights offering of Revlon, Inc.’s Class A
Common Stock (including the related private placement to MacAndrews & Forbes, the “$100 Million
Rights Offering”), which allowed each stockholder of record of Revlon, Inc.’s Class A and Class B Common
Stock as of the close of business on December 11, 2006, the record date set by Revlon, Inc.’s Board of
Directors, to purchase additional shares of Class A Common Stock. The subscription price for each share of
Class A Common Stock purchased in the $100 Million Rights Offering, including shares purchased in the
private placement by MacAndrews & Forbes, was $10.50 per share (as adjusted for the September 2008
1-for-10 Reverse Stock Split).

41

Upon completing the $100 Million Rights Offering, Revlon, Inc. promptly transferred the net proceeds
to Products Corporation, which it used in February 2007 to redeem $50.0 million aggregate principal
amount of its 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes at an aggregate redemption price of $50.3 million, including
$0.3 million of accrued and unpaid interest up to, but not including, the redemption date (the balance of
which was repaid in full in February 2008 — See “Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources —
2008 Repayment of the 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes with the MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subor-
dinated Term Loan”). Products Corporation used the remainder of such proceeds in January 2007 to repay
approximately $43.3 million of indebtedness outstanding under Products Corporation’s 2006 Revolving
Credit Facility, without any permanent reduction of that commitment, after paying fees and expenses of
approximately $1.1 million incurred in connection with the $100 Million Rights Offering, with approxi-
mately $5 million of the remaining net proceeds then being available for general corporate purposes.

In completing the $100 Million Rights Offering, Revlon, Inc. issued an additional 9,523,809 shares of its
Class A Common Stock (as adjusted for the September 2008 1-for-10 Reverse Stock Split), including
3,784,747 shares subscribed for by public shareholders (other than MacAndrews & Forbes) and
5,739,062 shares issued to MacAndrews & Forbes in a private placement directly from Revlon, Inc.
pursuant to a Stock Purchase Agreement between Revlon, Inc. and MacAndrews & Forbes, dated as of
December 18, 2006. The shares issued to MacAndrews & Forbes represented the number of shares of
Revlon, Inc.’s Class A Common Stock that MacAndrews & Forbes would otherwise have been entitled to
purchase pursuant to its basic subscription privilege in the $100 Million Rights Offering (which was
approximately 60% of the shares of Revlon, Inc.’s Class A Common Stock offered in the $100 Million
Rights Offering).

2008 Repayment of the 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes with the MacAndrews & Forbes Senior
Subordinated Term Loan

In January 2008, Products Corporation entered into the MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated
Term Loan Agreement and on February 1, 2008 used the $170 million of proceeds from such loan to repay in
full the $167.4 million remaining aggregate principal amount of Products Corporation’s 85⁄8% Senior
Subordinated Notes, which matured on February 1, 2008, and to pay $2.55 million of related fees and
expenses. In connection with such repayment, Products Corporation also used cash on hand to pay
$7.2 million of accrued and unpaid interest due on the 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes up to, but not
including, the February 1, 2008 maturity date.

In September 2008, Products Corporation used $63.0 million of the net proceeds from the Bozzano
Sale Transaction to partially repay $63.0 million of the outstanding aggregate principal amount of the
MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan. Following such partial repayment, there remained
outstanding $107 million in aggregate principal amount under the MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subor-
dinated Term Loan.

The MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan bears interest at an annual rate of 11%,
which is payable in arrears in cash on March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31 of each year.

Pursuant to a November 2008 amendment, the MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term
Loan is scheduled to mature on the earlier of (1) the date that Revlon, Inc. issues equity with gross proceeds
of at least $107 million, which proceeds would be contributed to Products Corporation and used to repay
the $107 million remaining aggregate principal balance of the MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated
Term Loan, or (2) August 1, 2010, in consideration for the payment of an extension fee of 1.5% of the
aggregate principal amount outstanding under the loan. The MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated
Term Loan continues to provide that Products Corporation may, at its option, prepay such loan, in whole or
in part, at any time prior to maturity, without premium or penalty. See Note 9(d),“MacAndrews & Forbes
Senior Subordinated Term Loan Agreement” to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further details
on the terms and conditions of the MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan.

In connection with the closing of the MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan, Revlon,
Inc. and MacAndrews & Forbes entered into a letter agreement in January 2008, pursuant to which Revlon,

42

Inc. agreed that, if Revlon, Inc. conducts any equity offering before the full payment of the MacAndrews &
Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan, and if MacAndrews & Forbes and/or its affiliates elects to
participate in any such offering, MacAndrews & Forbes and/or its affiliates may pay for any shares it
acquires in such offering either in cash or by tendering debt valued at its face amount under the
MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan Agreement, including any accrued but unpaid
interest, on a dollar for dollar basis, or in any combination of cash and such debt. Revlon, Inc. is under no
obligation to conduct an equity offering and MacAndrews & Forbes and its affiliates are under no
obligation to subscribe for shares should Revlon elect to conduct an equity offering.

2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit

In July 2004, Products Corporation and MacAndrews & Forbes Inc. entered into a line of credit, with
an initial commitment of $152.0 million, which was reduced to $87.0 million in July 2005 and reduced from
$87.0 million to $50.0 million in January 2007 upon Revlon, Inc.’s consummation of the $100 Million Rights
Offering (as amended, the “2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit”). Pursuant to a
December 2006 amendment, upon consummation of the $100 Million Rights Offering, which was com-
pleted in January 2007, $50.0 million of the line of credit remained available to Products Corporation
through January 31, 2008 on substantially the same terms (which line of credit would otherwise have
terminated pursuant to its terms upon the consummation of the $100 Million Rights Offering). The 2004
Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit expired in accordance with its terms on January 31,
2008. It was undrawn during its entire term.

Interest Rate Swap Transactions

In September 2007 and April 2008, Products Corporation executed the two floating-to-fixed Interest
Rate Swaps each with a notional amount of $150.0 million over a period of two years relating to
indebtedness under Products Corporation’s 2006 Term Loan Facility. The Company designated the Interest
Rate Swaps as cash flow hedges of the variable interest rate payments on Products Corporation’s 2006 Term
Loan Facility. Under the terms of the 2007 Interest Rate Swap and the 2008 Interest Rate Swap, Products
Corporation is required to pay to the counterparty a quarterly fixed interest rate of 4.692% and 2.66%,
respectively, on the $150.0 million notional amounts which commenced in December 2007 and July 2008,
respectively, while receiving a variable interest rate payment from the counterparty equal to three-month
U.S. dollar LIBOR (which, based upon the 4.0% applicable margin, effectively fixed the interest rate on
such notional amounts at 8.692% and 6.66%, respectively, for the 2-year term of each swap). While the
Company is exposed to credit loss in the event of the counterparty’s non-performance, if any, the
Company’s exposure is limited to the net amount that Products Corporation would have received over
the remaining balance of each Interest Rate Swap’s two-year term. The Company does not anticipate any
non-performance and, furthermore, even in the case of any non-performance by the counterparty, the
Company expects that any such loss would not be material. The fair value of Products Corporation’s 2007
Interest Rate Swap and 2008 Interest Rate Swap was $(3.8) million and $(1.9) million, respectively, at
December 31, 2008.

Sources and Uses

The Company’s principal sources of funds are expected to be operating revenues, cash on hand and
funds available for borrowing under the 2006 Revolving Credit Agreement and other permitted lines of
credit. The 2006 Credit Agreements, the indenture governing Products Corporation’s 91⁄2% Senior Notes
and the MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan Agreement contain certain provisions that
by their terms limit Products Corporation and its subsidiaries’ ability to, among other things, incur
additional debt.

The Company’s principal uses of funds are expected to be the payment of operating expenses,
including expenses in connection with the continued execution of the Company’s business strategy,
purchases of permanent wall displays, capital expenditure requirements, payments in connection with
the Company’s restructuring programs, severance not otherwise included in the Company’s restructuring

43

programs, debt service payments and costs and regularly scheduled pension and post-retirement benefit
plan contributions and benefit payments. The Company’s cash contributions to its pension and post-
retirement benefit plans were $12.8 million in 2008. In accordance with the minimum pension contributions
required under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), as amended by the
Pension Protection Act of 2006 and amended by the Worker, Retiree and Employer Recovery Act of 2008,
the Company expects cash contributions to its pension and post-retirement benefit plans to be approx-
imately $25 million to $30 million in 2009. The Company’s purchases of permanent wall displays and capital
expenditures in 2008 were approximately $50 million and $20 million, respectively. The Company expects
purchases of permanent wall displays and capital expenditures in 2009 to be approximately $50 million and
$20 million, respectively. See “Restructuring Costs, Net” above in this Form 10-K for discussion of the
Company’s expected uses of funds in connection with its various restructuring programs.

The Company has undertaken, and continues to assess, refine and implement, a number of programs to
efficiently manage its cash and working capital including, among other things, programs to reduce inventory
levels over time, centralized purchasing to secure discounts and efficiencies in procurement, and providing
additional discounts to U.S. customers for timely payment of receivables, careful management of accounts
payable and targeted controls on general and administrative spending.

Continuing to execute the Company’s business strategy could include taking advantage of additional
opportunities to reposition, repackage or reformulate one or more brands or product lines, launching
additional new products, acquiring businesses or brands, further refining the Company’s approach to retail
merchandising and/or taking further actions to optimize its manufacturing, sourcing and organizational size
and structure. Any of these actions, whose intended purpose would be to create value through profitable
growth, could result in the Company making investments and/or recognizing charges related to executing
against such opportunities.

The Company expects that operating revenues, cash on hand and funds available for borrowing under
the 2006 Revolving Credit Facility and other permitted lines of credit will be sufficient to enable the
Company to cover its operating expenses for 2009, including cash requirements in connection with the
payment of operating expenses, including expenses in connection with the execution of the Company’s
business strategy, purchases of permanent wall displays, capital expenditure requirements, payments in
connection with the Company’s restructuring programs, severance not otherwise included in the Compa-
ny’s restructuring programs, debt service payments and costs and regularly scheduled pension and post-
retirement plan contributions and benefit payments. As a result of the decline in U.S. and global financial
markets in 2008, the market value of the Company’s pension fund assets declined, which has the effect of
reducing the funded status of such plans. At the same time, the discount rate used to value the Company’s
pension obligation increased, which partially offset the effect of the asset decline. While these conditions
did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or liquidity
during 2008, the Company expects that these factors, absent a significant increase in pension plan asset
values, will result in increased cash contributions to the Company’s pension plans in 2010 and beyond than
otherwise would have been expected before the decline in pension plan asset values in 2008.

There can be no assurance that available funds will be sufficient to meet the Company’s cash
requirements on a consolidated basis. If the Company’s anticipated level of revenues are not achieved
because of, for example, decreased consumer spending in response to weak economic conditions or
weakness in the cosmetics category in the mass retail channel; adverse changes in currency; decreased
sales of the Company’s products as a result of increased competitive activities by the Company’s com-
petitors; changes in consumer purchasing habits, including with respect to shopping channels, retailer
inventory management, retailer space reconfigurations or reductions in retailer display space; less than
anticipated results from the Company’s existing or new products or from its advertising and/or marketing
plans; or if the Company’s expenses, including, without limitation, for advertising and promotions or for
returns related to any reduction of retail space, product discontinuances or otherwise, exceed the antic-
ipated level of expenses, the Company’s current sources of funds may be insufficient to meet the Company’s
cash requirements.

44

In the event of a decrease in demand for the Company’s products, reduced sales, lack of increases in
demand and sales, changes in consumer purchasing habits, including with respect to shopping channels,
retailer inventory management, retailer space reconfigurations or reductions in retailer display space,
product discontinuances and/or advertising and promotion expenses or returns expenses exceeding its
expectations or less than anticipated results from the Company’s existing or new products or from its
advertising and/or marketing plans, any such development, if significant, could reduce the Company’s
revenues and could adversely affect Products Corporation’s ability to comply with certain financial
covenants under the 2006 Credit Agreements and in such event the Company could be required to take
measures, including, among other things, reducing discretionary spending.

(See Item 1A, “Risk Factors — The Company’s ability to service its debt and meet its cash require-
ments depends on many factors, including achieving anticipated levels of revenue and expenses. If such
revenue or expense levels prove to be other than as anticipated, the Company may be unable to meet its
cash requirements or Products Corporation may be unable to meet the requirements of the financial
covenants under the 2006 Credit Agreements, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s
business, financial condition and/or results of operations”; “— Limits on Products Corporation’s borrowing
capacity under the 2006 Revolving Credit Facility may affect the Company’s ability to finance its oper-
ations”; “— The Company may be unable to increase its sales through the Company’s primary distribution
channels, which could reduce the Company’s net sales and have a material adverse effect on the Company’s
business, financial condition and/or results of operations”; and “— Restrictions and covenants in Products
Corporation’s debt agreements limit its ability to take certain actions and impose consequences in the event
of failure to comply”).

If the Company is unable to satisfy its cash requirements from the sources identified above or comply
with its debt covenants, the Company could be required to adopt one or more of the following alternatives:

• delaying the implementation of or revising certain aspects of the Company’s business strategy;

•

•

reducing or delaying purchases of wall displays or advertising or promotional expenses;

reducing or delaying capital spending;

• delaying, reducing or revising the Company’s restructuring programs;

•

•

•

•

refinancing Products Corporation’s indebtedness;

selling assets or operations;

seeking additional capital contributions and/or loans from MacAndrews & Forbes, the Company’s
other affiliates and/or third parties;

selling additional Revlon, Inc. equity securities or debt securities of Revlon, Inc. or Products
Corporation; or

•

reducing other discretionary spending.

There can be no assurance that the Company would be able to take any of the actions referred to above
because of a variety of commercial or market factors or constraints in Products Corporation’s debt
instruments, including, without limitation, market conditions being unfavorable for an equity or debt
issuance, additional capital contributions and/or loans not being available from affiliates and/or third
parties, or that the transactions may not be permitted under the terms of Products Corporation’s various
debt instruments then in effect, such as due to restrictions on the incurrence of debt, incurrence of liens,
asset dispositions and related party transactions. In addition, such actions, if taken, may not enable the
Company to satisfy its cash requirements or enable Products Corporation to comply with its debt covenants
if the actions do not generate a sufficient amount of additional capital. (See Item 1A, “Risk Factors” for
further discussion of risks associated with the Company’s business).

Revlon, Inc., as a holding company, will be dependent on the earnings and cash flow of, and dividends
and distributions from, Products Corporation to pay its expenses and to pay any cash dividend or

45

distribution on Revlon, Inc.’s Class A Common Stock that may be authorized by Revlon, Inc.’s Board of
Directors. The terms of the 2006 Credit Agreements, the indenture governing the 91⁄2% Senior Notes and
the MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan Agreement generally restrict Products
Corporation from paying dividends or making distributions, except that Products Corporation is permitted
to pay dividends and make distributions to Revlon, Inc. to enable Revlon, Inc., among other things, to pay
expenses incidental to being a public holding company, including, among other things, professional fees,
such as legal, accounting and insurance fees, regulatory fees, such as SEC filing fees, NYSE listing fees and
other expenses related to being a public holding company and, subject to certain limitations, to pay
dividends or make distributions in certain circumstances to finance the purchase by Revlon, Inc. of its
Class A Common Stock in connection with the delivery of such Class A Common Stock to grantees under
the Third Amended and Restated Revlon, Inc. Stock Plan (the “Stock Plan”).

As a result of dealing with suppliers and vendors in a number of foreign countries, Products Corpo-
ration enters into foreign currency forward exchange contracts and option contracts from time to time to
hedge certain cash flows denominated in foreign currencies. The foreign currency forward exchange
contracts are entered into primarily for the purpose of hedging anticipated inventory purchases and certain
intercompany payments denominated in foreign currencies and generally have maturities of less than one
year. There were foreign currency forward exchange contracts with a notional amount of $41.0 million
outstanding at December 31, 2008. The fair value of foreign currency forward exchange contracts
outstanding at December 31, 2008 was $2.0 million.

Disclosures about Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

The following table aggregates all contractual commitments and commercial obligations that affect the

Company’s financial condition and liquidity position as of December 31, 2008:

Contractual Obligations

Long-term Debt, including Current Portion . . . .
Long-term Debt — affiliates(a). . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest on Long-term Debt(b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest on Long-term Debt — affiliates(c) . . . . .
Capital Lease Obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating Leases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchase Obligations(d) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other Long-term Obligations(e) . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total

$1,223.9
107.0
259.9
18.7
3.2
80.1
52.0
26.7

Payments Due by Period
(dollars in millions)

Less than
1 year

1-3 years

3-5 years

$ 18.9
—
95.1
11.8
1.3
16.3
51.2
13.4

$396.5
107.0
162.5
6.9
1.7
26.3
0.8
13.3

$808.5
—
2.3
—
0.2
22.1
—
—

Total Contractual Cash Obligations . . . . . . . . . . .

$1,771.5

$208.0

$715.0

$833.1

After
5 years

$ —
—
—
—
—
15.4
—
—

$15.4

(a) Reflects the $107 million remaining aggregate principal amount of the MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan,
which is due on the earlier of (1) the date that Revlon, Inc. issues equity with gross proceeds of at least $107 million, which
proceeds would be contributed to Products Corporation and used to repay the $107 million remaining aggregate principal
balance of the MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan, or (2) August 1, 2010, after giving effect to the September
2008 repayment of $63.0 million in aggregate principal amount of such loan with $63.0 million of the net proceeds of the Bozzano
Sale Transaction.

(b) Consists of interest primarily on the 91⁄2% Senior Notes and on the 2006 Term Loan Facility through the respective maturity dates
based upon assumptions regarding the amount of debt outstanding under the 2006 Credit Facilities and assumed interest rates.
(See “Recent Developments”). In addition, this amount reflects the impact of the 2007 Interest Rate Swap and 2008 Interest
Rate Swap, each covering $150 million notional amount under the 2006 Term Loan Facility, which resulted in an effective
weighted average interest rate of 6.6% on the 2006 Term Loan Facility as of December 31, 2008. (See “Financial Condition,
Liquidity and Capital Resources — Interest Rate Swap Transactions”).

(c)

Includes interest on the $107 million remaining aggregate principal amount outstanding under the MacAndrews & Forbes Senior
Subordinated Term Loan Agreement which Products Corporation entered into in January 2008. The MacAndrews & Forbes
Senior Subordinated Term Loan matures on the earlier of (1) the date that Revlon, Inc. issues equity with gross proceeds of at
least $107 million, which proceeds would be used to repay the $107 million remaining aggregate principal balance of the

46

MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan, or (2) August 1, 2010 and bears interest at an annual rate of 11%, which
is payable in arrears in cash on March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31 of each year. (See “Financial Condition,
Liquidity and Capital Resources — 2008 Repayment of the 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes with the MacAndrews & Forbes
Senior Subordinated Term Loan”).

(d) Consists of purchase commitments for finished goods, raw materials, components and services pursuant to enforceable and
legally binding obligations which include all significant terms, including fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed,
minimum or variable price provisions; and the approximate timing of the transactions.

(e) Consists primarily of obligations related to advertising contracts. Such amounts exclude employment agreements, severance and
other contractual commitments, which severance and other contractual commitments related to restructuring are discussed
under “Restructuring Costs”.

Off-Balance Sheet Transactions

The Company does not maintain any off-balance sheet transactions, arrangements, obligations or other
relationships with unconsolidated entities or others that are reasonably likely to have a material current or
future effect on the Company’s financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses,
results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

Discussion of Critical Accounting Policies

In the ordinary course of its business, the Company has made a number of estimates and assumptions
relating to the reporting of results of operations and financial condition in the preparation of its financial
statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. Actual results could
differ significantly from those estimates and assumptions. The Company believes that the following
discussion addresses the Company’s most critical accounting policies, which are those that are most
important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and results and require management’s
most difficult, subjective and complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the
effect of matters that are inherently uncertain.

Sales Returns:

The Company allows customers to return their unsold products when they meet certain company-
established criteria as outlined in the Company’s trade terms. The Company regularly reviews and revises,
when deemed necessary, the Company’s estimates of sales returns based primarily upon actual returns,
planned product discontinuances and promotional sales, which would permit customers to return items
based upon the Company’s trade terms. The Company records estimated sales returns as a reduction to
sales and cost of sales, and an increase in accrued liabilities and inventories.

Returned products, which are recorded as inventories, are valued based upon the amount that the
Company expects to realize upon their subsequent disposition. The physical condition and marketability of
the returned products are the major factors the Company considers in estimating realizable value. Cost of
sales includes the cost of refurbishment of returned products. Actual returns, as well as realized values on
returned products, may differ significantly, either favorably or unfavorably, from the Company’s estimates
if factors such as product discontinuances, customer inventory levels or competitive conditions differ from
the Company’s estimates and expectations and, in the case of actual returns, if economic conditions differ
significantly from the Company’s estimates and expectations.

Trade Support Costs:

In order to support the retail trade, the Company has various performance-based arrangements with
retailers to reimburse them for all or a portion of their promotional activities related to the Company’s
products. The Company regularly reviews and revises, when deemed necessary, estimates of costs to the
Company for these promotions based on estimates of what has been incurred by the retailers. Actual costs
incurred by the Company may differ significantly if factors such as the level and success of the retailers’
programs, as well as retailer participation levels, differ from the Company’s estimates and expectations.

47

Inventories:

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market value. Cost is principally determined by the
first-in, first-out method. The Company records adjustments to the value of inventory based upon its
forecasted plans to sell its inventories, as well as planned discontinuances. The physical condition (e.g., age
and quality) of the inventories is also considered in establishing its valuation. These adjustments are
estimates, which could vary significantly, either favorably or unfavorably, from the amounts that the
Company may ultimately realize upon the disposition of inventories if future economic conditions,
customer inventory levels, product discontinuances, return levels or competitive conditions differ from
the Company’s estimates and expectations.

Pension Benefits:

The Company sponsors both funded and unfunded pension and other retirement plans in various forms
covering employees who meet the applicable eligibility requirements. The Company uses several statistical
and other factors in an attempt to estimate future events in calculating the liability and expense related to
these plans. These factors include assumptions about the discount rate, expected long-term return on plan
assets and rate of future compensation increases as determined annually by the Company, within certain
guidelines, which assumptions would be subject to revisions if significant events occur during the year. The
Company uses December 31st as its measurement date for defined benefit pension plan obligations and
assets.

The Company selected a weighted-average discount rate of 6.35% in 2008, representing an increase
from the 6.24% weighted-average discount rate selected in 2007 for the Company’s U.S. defined benefit
pension plans. The Company selected an average discount rate for the Company’s international defined
benefit pension plans of 6.4% in 2008, representing an increase from the 5.7% average discount rate
selected in 2007. The discount rates are used to measure the benefit obligations at the measurement date and
the net periodic benefit cost for the subsequent calendar year and are reset annually using data available at
the measurement date. The changes in the discount rates used for 2008 were primarily due to increasing
long-term interest yields on high-quality corporate bonds during 2008. At December 31, 2008, the increase
in the discount rates from December 31, 2007 had the effect of decreasing the Company’s projected pension
benefit obligation by approximately $11.6 million. For fiscal 2009, the Company expects that the afore-
mentioned increase in the discount rate will have the effect of decreasing the net periodic benefit cost for its
U.S. and international defined benefit pension plans by approximately $0.6 million. (See “Overview —
Other Factors”).

Each year during the first quarter, the Company selects an expected long-term rate of return on its
pension plan assets. For the Company’s U.S. defined benefit pension plans, the expected long-term rate of
return on the pension plan assets used in 2008 (based upon data available in March 2008 when the Company
filed its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 and before the significant declines in the financial
markets in late 2008) was 8.25%, representing a decrease from the 8.5% rate used in 2007. The average
expected long-term rate of return used for the Company’s international plans in 2008 was 6.9%, repre-
senting an increase from the 6.7% average rate used in 2007.

The table below reflects the Company’s estimates of the possible effects of changes in the discount
rates and expected long-term rates of return on its 2008 net periodic benefit costs and its projected benefit
obligation at December 31, 2008 for the Company’s principal defined benefit pension plans:

Discount rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expected long-term rate of return . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$(0.2)
(1.0)

Net periodic
benefit costs

Projected
pension
benefit
obligation

$(15.0)
—

Net periodic
benefit costs

$0.7
1.2

Projected
pension
benefit
obligation

$15.7
—

Effect of
25 basis points increase

Effect of
25 basis points decrease

48

The rate of future compensation increases is another assumption used by the Company’s third party
actuarial consultants for pension accounting. The rate of future compensation increases used in 2008 and in
2007 remained unchanged at 4.0% for the U.S. defined benefit pension plans. In addition, the Company’s
actuarial consultants also use other factors such as withdrawal and mortality rates. The actuarial assump-
tions used by the Company may differ materially from actual results due to changing market and economic
conditions, higher or lower withdrawal rates or longer or shorter life spans of participants, among other
things. Differences from these assumptions could significantly impact the actual amount of net periodic
benefit cost and liability recorded by the Company.

Income Taxes:

The Company records income taxes based on amounts payable with respect to the current year and
includes the effect of deferred taxes. The effective tax rate reflects statutory tax rates, tax-planning
opportunities available in various jurisdictions in which the Company operates, and the Company’s
estimate of the ultimate outcome of various tax audits and issues. Determining the Company’s effective
tax rate and evaluating tax positions requires significant judgment.

The Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the future impact of differences between
the financial statement carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, as well as for
operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. The Company measures deferred tax assets and liabilities using
enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which management expects that the
Company will recover or settle those differences. The Company has established valuation allowances for
deferred tax assets when management has determined that it is not more likely than not that the Company
will realize a tax benefit.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”. This statement
clarifies the definition of fair value of assets and liabilities, establishes a framework for measuring fair value
of assets and liabilities and expands the disclosures on fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective
for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. However, the FASB deferred the effective date of
SFAS No. 157 until the fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 as it relates to the fair value
measurement requirements for nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are initially measured at fair value,
but not measured at fair value in subsequent periods. These nonfinancial assets include goodwill and other
indefinite-lived intangible assets which are included within other assets. In accordance with SFAS No. 157,
the Company has adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 157 with respect to financial assets and liabilities
effective as of January 1, 2008 and its adoption did not have a material impact on its results of operations or
financial condition. The Company will adopt SFAS No. 157 for nonfinancial assets and liabilities effective as
of January 1, 2009 and does not expect that its adoption will have a material impact on the Company’s
results of operations or financial condition.

The fair value framework under SFAS No. 157 requires the categorization of assets and liabilities into
three levels based upon the assumptions used to price the assets or liabilities. Level 1 provides the most
reliable measure of fair value, whereas Level 3, if applicable, generally would require significant man-
agement judgment. The three levels for categorizing assets and liabilities under SFAS No. 157’s fair value
measurement requirements are as follows:

• Level 1: Fair valuing the asset or liability using observable inputs such as quoted prices in active

markets for identical assets or liabilities;

• Level 2: Fair valuing the asset or liability using inputs other than quoted prices that are observable
for the applicable asset or liability, either directly or indirectly; such as quoted prices for similar (as
opposed to identical) assets or liabilities in active markets and quoted prices for identical or similar
assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; and

49

• Level 3: Fair valuing the asset or liability using unobservable inputs that reflect the Company’s

own assumptions.

As of December 31, 2008 the fair values of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, namely its
foreign currency forward exchange contracts and Interest Rate Swaps, are categorized as presented in the
table below:

Total

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Assets
Interest Rate Swaps(a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts(b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$0.8
2.2

Total assets at fair value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$3.0

Liabilities
Interest Rate Swaps(a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts(b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$6.5
0.2

Total liabilities at fair value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$6.7

$—
—

$—

$—
—

$—

$0.8
2.2

$3.0

$6.5
0.2

$6.7

$—
—

$—

$—
—

$—

(a) Based on three-month U.S. Dollar LIBOR index.

(b) Based on observable market transactions of spot and forward rates.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R, “Business Combinations”. This statement
establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer of a business recognizes and measures in
its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any non-controlling interest
in the acquiree and goodwill acquired, and it provides guidance for disclosures about business combina-
tions. SFAS No. 141R requires all assets acquired, the liabilities assumed and any non-controlling interest in
the acquiree be recognized at their fair values at the acquisition date. SFAS No. 141R also requires the
acquirer to expense acquisition costs as incurred and to expense restructuring costs in the periods
subsequent to the acquisition date. In addition, SFAS No. 141R also requires the acquirer to recognize
changes in valuation allowances on acquired deferred tax assets in its statement of operations on financial
condition. These changes in deferred tax benefits were previously recognized through a corresponding
reduction to goodwill. With the exception of provisions regarding acquired deferred taxes, which are
applicable to all business combinations, SFAS No. 141R applies prospectively to business combinations for
which the acquisition date is on or after the fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company
will adopt the provisions of SFAS No. 141R effective as of January 1, 2009 and expects that its adoption will
not have a material impact on its results of operations or financial condition.

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities — An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133”. This statement is intended to improve
financial reporting of derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures about
(a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments; (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged
items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and its related interpretations; and (c) how derivative
instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance and cash
flows. The provisions of SFAS No. 161 are effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. See
Note 10, “Financial Instruments — Derivative Financial Instruments” for the Company’s disclosures
required under SFAS No. 161. The Company has adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 161 as of December 31,
2008 and its adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations or financial
condition.

Inflation

The Company’s costs are affected by inflation and the effects of inflation may be experienced by the
Company in future periods. Management believes, however, that such effects have not been material to the
Company during the past three years in the U.S. and in foreign non-hyperinflationary countries. The

50

Company operates in certain countries around the world, such as Argentina and Venezuela, which have in
the past experienced hyperinflation. In hyperinflationary foreign countries, the Company attempts to
mitigate the effects of inflation by increasing prices in line with inflation, where possible, and efficiently
managing its costs and working capital levels.

Subsequent Events

None.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Interest Rate Sensitivity

The Company has exposure to changing interest rates primarily under the 2006 Term Loan Facility and
2006 Revolving Credit Facility. The Company manages interest rate risk through the use of a combination
of fixed and floating rate debt. The Company from time to time makes use of derivative financial
instruments to adjust its fixed and floating rate ratio. In September 2007 and April 2008, Products
Corporation executed the two floating-to-fixed Interest Rate Swaps, each with a notional amount of
$150.0 million over a period of two years relating to indebtedness under Products Corporation’s 2006 Term
Loan Facility. The Company designated the Interest Rate Swaps as cash flow hedges of the variable interest
rate payments on Products Corporation’s 2006 Term Loan Facility. (See “Financial Condition, Liquidity and
Capital Resources — Interest Rate Swap Transactions”).

The table below provides information about the Company’s indebtedness that is sensitive to changes in
interest rates. The table presents cash flows with respect to principal on indebtedness and related weighted
average interest rates by expected maturity dates. Weighted average variable rates are based on implied
forward rates in the U.S. Dollar LIBOR yield curve at December 31, 2008. The information is presented in
U.S. dollar equivalents, which is the Company’s reporting currency.

Exchange Rate Sensitivity

The Company manufactures and sells its products in a number of countries throughout the world and,
as a result, is exposed to movements in foreign currency exchange rates. In addition, a portion of the
Company’s borrowings are denominated in foreign currencies, which are also subject to market risk
associated with exchange rate movement. The Company from time to time hedges major foreign currency
cash exposures through foreign exchange forward and option contracts. Products Corporation enters into
these contracts with major financial institutions in an attempt to minimize counterparty risk. These
contracts generally have a duration of less than twelve months and are primarily against the U.S. dollar.
In addition, Products Corporation enters into foreign currency swaps to hedge intercompany financing
transactions. The Company does not hold or issue financial instruments for trading purposes.

51

Expected maturity date for the year ended December 31,
(dollars in millions, except for rate information)

Debt

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013 Thereafter

Total

Fair Value
December 31,
2008

Short-term variable rate

(various currencies) . . . . . . .
Average interest rate(a) . . . .
Short-term fixed rate — third
party (various currencies) . .
Average interest rate . . . . . .
Long-term fixed rate — third
party ($US) . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Average interest rate . . . . . .

Long-term fixed rate —

affiliates ($US) . . . . . . . . . .
Average interest rate . . . . . .

Long-term variable rate —

$ 0.5

7.5%

$ 0.2(b)
6.0%

$390.0

9.5%

$107.0

11.0%

third party ($US). . . . . . . . .
Average interest rate(a)(c) . .

$18.7 $
6.0%

$ 6.5

$808.5

7.2% 5.9%

$

0.5

$

0.5

0.2

0.2

390.0

295.9

107.0

81.0

833.7

591.9

Total debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$19.4 $107.0

$396.5 $808.5

$—

$—

$1,331.4

$969.5

(a) Weighted average variable rates are based upon implied forward rates from the U.S. Dollar LIBOR yield curves at December 31,

2008.

(b) On January 30, 2008, Products Corporation entered into the MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan Agreement
and on February 1, 2008 used the $170 million proceeds from such loan to repay in full the balance of the approximately
$167.4 million aggregate remaining principal amount of Products Corporation’s 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes, which matured
on February 1, 2008. In September 2008, Products Corporation used $63.0 million of the net proceeds from the Bozzano Sale
Transaction to repay $63.0 million in aggregate principal amount of the MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan.
Following such partial repayment, there remained outstanding $107 million in aggregate principal amount under the MacAn-
drews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan. The MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan bears an annual
interest rate of 11%, which is payable in arrears in cash on March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31 of each year and,
pursuant to a November 2008 amendment, matures on the earlier of (1) the date that Revlon, Inc. issues equity with gross
proceeds of at least $107 million, which proceeds would be used to repay the $107 million remaining aggregate principal balance
of the MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan, or (2) August 1, 2010. (See “Financial Condition, Liquidity and
Capital Resources — 2008 Repayment of the 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes with the MacAndrews & Forbes Senior
Subordinated Term Loan”).

(c) Based upon the implied forward rate from the U.S. Dollar LIBOR yield curve at December 31, 2008, this reflects the impact of the
2007 Interest Rate Swap and 2008 Interest Rate Swap, each covering $150 million notional amount under the 2006 Term Loan
Facility, which would result in an effective weighted average interest rate of 5.9% on the 2006 Term Loan Facility at December 31,
2009.

52

Forward Contracts

Average
Contractual
Rate
$/FC

Original
US Dollar
Notional
Amount

Contract
Value
December 31,
2008

Fair Value
December 31,
2008

Sell Canadian Dollars/Buy USD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sell Australian Dollars/Buy USD . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sell British Pounds/Buy USD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sell South African Rand/Buy USD . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Buy Australian Dollars/Sell New Zealand

Dollars . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sell Euros/Buy USD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sell New Zealand Dollars/Buy US . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sell Hong Kong Dollars/Buy USD . . . . . . . . . . . . .

0.8733
0.7119
1.6182
0.1048

1.2093
1.4288
0.6164
0.1290

$15.2
8.5
6.3
5.1

3.6
1.5
0.3
0.5

$16.1
8.7
6.9
5.3

3.7
1.5
0.3
0.5

Total forward contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$41.0

$43.0

$0.9
0.2
0.6
0.2

0.1
—
—
—

$2.0

Interest Rate Swap Transactions(a)(b)

Expected Maturity date for the Year Ended December 31,

2009

2010

Total

Fair Value
December 31,
2008(c)

Notional Amount . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Average Pay Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Average Receive Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$150.0
3.676%
3-month USD
LIBOR

$150.0
2.66%
3-month USD
LIBOR

$300.0

$(5.7)

(a)

(b)

In September 2007, Products Corporation executed the floating-to-fixed 2007 Interest Rate Swap with a notional amount of
$150.0 million over a period of two years expiring on September 17, 2009 relating to indebtedness under Products Corporation’s
2006 Term Loan Facility. The Company designated the 2007 Interest Rate Swap as a cash flow hedge of the variable interest rate
payments on Products Corporation’s 2006 Term Loan Facility. (See “Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources —
Interest Rate Swap Transactions”).

In April 2008, Products Corporation executed the floating-to-fixed 2008 Interest Rate Swap with a notional amount of
$150.0 million over a period of two years expiring on April 16, 2010 relating to indebtedness under Products Corporation’s
2006 Term Loan Facility. The Company designated the 2008 Interest Rate Swap as a cash flow hedge of the variable interest rate
payments on Products Corporation’s 2006 Term Loan Facility. (See “Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources —
Interest Rate Swap Transactions”).

(c) The $(5.7) million fair value of the Interest Rate Swap Transactions at December 31, 2008 is comprised of $(3.8) million fair value

of the 2007 Interest Rate Swap and $(1.9) million fair value of the 2008 Interest Rate Swap.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Reference is made to the Index on page F-1 of the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements and

the Notes thereto contained herein.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Company maintains disclosure controls and proce-
dures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s reports under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within
the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and
communicated to management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. The Company’s manage-
ment, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has

53

evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the fiscal
year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on
Form 10-K, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

(b) Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. The Company’s
management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial
reporting. The Company’s internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding
the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation and fair presentation of published financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and
procedures that:

• pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the

transactions and dispositions of its assets;

• provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of
its financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that its
receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of its manage-
ment and directors; and

• provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisi-
tion, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on its financial
statements.

Internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements due to its inherent
limitations. Management’s projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting as to future periods are subject to the risks that controls may become inadequate
because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate.

The Company’s management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2008 and in making this assessment used the criteria set forth
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control-Inte-
grated Framework in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States).

Revlon, Inc.’s management determined that as of December 31, 2008, the Company’s internal control

over financial reporting was effective.

KPMG LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm that audited the Compa-
ny’s financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,
2008, has issued a report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. This report appears on
page F-3.

(c) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There have not been any changes in the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2008 that
have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information

None.

Forward Looking Statements

This Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as well as other public
documents and statements of the Company, contain forward-looking statements that involve risks and
uncertainties, which are based on the beliefs, expectations, estimates, projections, forecasts, plans,

54

anticipations, targets, outlooks, initiatives, visions, objectives, strategies, opportunities, drivers, focus and
intents of the Company’s management. While the Company believes that its estimates and assumptions are
reasonable, the Company cautions that it is very difficult to predict the impact of known factors, and, of
course, it is impossible for the Company to anticipate all factors that could affect its results. The Company’s
actual results may differ materially from those discussed in such forward-looking statements. Such state-
ments include, without limitation, the Company’s expectations and estimates (whether qualitative or
quantitative) as to:

(i)

(ii)

(iii)

(iv)

(v)

(vi)

the Company’s future financial performance;

the effect on sales of decreased consumer spending in response to weak economic conditions or
weakness in the cosmetics category in the mass retail channel; adverse changes in currency;
decreased sales of the Company’s products as a result of increased competitive activities by the
Company’s competitors, changes in consumer purchasing habits, including, with respect to
shopping channels; retailer inventory management; retailer space reconfigurations or reduc-
tions in retailer display space; less than anticipated results from the Company’s existing or new
products or from its advertising and/or marketing plans; or if the Company’s expenses,
including, without limitation, for advertising and promotions or for returns related to any
reduction of retail space, product discontinuances or otherwise, exceed the anticipated level of
expenses;

the Company’s belief that the continued execution of its business strategy could include taking
advantage of additional opportunities to reposition, repackage or reformulate one or more of
its brands or product lines, launching additional new products, acquiring businesses or brands,
further refining its approach to retail merchandising and/or taking further actions to optimize
its manufacturing, sourcing and organizational size and structure, any of which, whose intended
purpose would be to create value through profitable growth, could result in the Company
making investments and/or
such
opportunities;

related to executing against

recognizing charges

our expectations regarding our business strategy, including our plans to (a) build and leverage
our brands, particularly the Revlon brand, across the categories in which we compete, and, in
addition to the Revlon and Almay brand color cosmetics, our seeking to drive growth in other
beauty care categories, including women’s hair color, beauty tools, anti-perspirants/deodorants
and skincare and our continuing focus on our key growth drivers, including innovative, high-
quality, consumer-preferred new products; effective integrated brand communication; appro-
priate levels of advertising and promotion; and superb execution with our retail partners, along
with disciplined spending and rigorous cost control; (b) improve the execution of its strategies
and plans and provide for continued improvement in our organizational capability through
enabling and developing our employees, including primarily through a focus on recruitment and
retention of skilled people, providing opportunities for professional development, as well as
new and expanded responsibilities and roles for employees who have demonstrated capability
and rewarding our employees for success; (c) continue to strengthen our international business
and to continue to focus on improving our operating performance in our international business;
(d) improve our operating profit margins and cash flow, including our focus on improving our
financial performance through a steady improvement in operating profit margins and cash flow
generation; and (e) continue to improve our capital structure, including our focus on strenght-
ening our balance sheet and reducing debt over time;

restructuring activities, restructuring costs, the timing of restructuring payments and the
benefits from such activities;

the Company’s expectation that operating revenues, cash on hand and funds available for
borrowing under Products Corporation’s 2006 Revolving Credit Facility and other permitted
lines of credit will be sufficient to enable the Company to cover its operating expenses for 2009,
including cash requirements referred to in item (viii) below;

55

(vii)

(viii)

the Company’s expected principal sources of funds, including operating revenues, cash on hand
and funds available for borrowing under Products Corporation’s 2006 Revolving Credit Facility
and other permitted lines of credit, as well as the availability of funds from refinancing Products
Corporation’s indebtedness, selling assets or operations, capital contributions and/or loans from
MacAndrews & Forbes, the Company’s other affiliates and/or third parties and/or the sale of
additional equity securities of Revlon, Inc. or additional debt securities of Revlon, Inc. or
Products Corporation;

the Company’s expected principal uses of funds, including amounts required for the payment of
operating expenses, including expenses in connection with the continued execution of the
Company’s business strategy, payments in connection with the Company’s purchases of
permanent wall displays, capital expenditure requirements, restructuring programs, severance
not otherwise included in the Company’s restructuring programs, debt service payments and
costs and regularly scheduled pension and post-retirement benefit plan contributions and
benefit payments, and its estimates of operating expenses, the amount and timing of restruc-
turing costs and payments, severance costs and payments, debt service payments (including
payments required under Products Corporation’s debt instruments), cash contributions to the
Company’s pension plans and post-retirement benefit plans and benefit payments, purchases of
permanent wall displays and capital expenditures;

(ix) matters concerning the Company’s market-risk sensitive instruments, including the Interest
Rate Swaps, which are intended to reduce the effects of floating interest rates and the
Company’s exposure to interest rate volatility by hedging against fluctuations in variable
interest rate payments on the applicable notional amounts of Products Corporation’s long-term
debt under its 2006 Term Loan Facility, as well as the Company’s expectations as to the
counterparty’s performance, including that any loss arising from the non-performance by the
counterparty would not be material;

(x)

the expected effects of the Company’s adoption of certain accounting principles;

(xi)

(xii)

the Company’s plan to efficiently manage its cash and working capital, including, among other
things, programs to reduce inventory levels over time, centralized purchasing to secure dis-
counts and efficiencies in procurement, and providing additional discounts to U.S. customers for
timely payment of receivables, carefully managing accounts payable and targeted controls on
general and administrative spending;

the Company’s expectations regarding the impact of future pension expense and cash contri-
butions, including that as a result of the decline in U.S. and global financial markets in 2008, the
market value of the Company’s pension fund assets declined, which has the effect of reducing
the funded status of such plans, which absent a significant increase in pension plan asset values,
will result in increased cash contributions to the Company’s pension plans in 2010 and beyond
than otherwise would have been expected before the decline in pension plan asset values in
2008 and that its results in 2009 will be impacted from increased pension expense due to a
significant decline in pension asset values in 2008; and

(xiii)

the Company’s expectations regarding the impact of foreign currency fluctuations, including
that its results in 2009 may be further affected by adverse foreign currency fluctuations and
uncertain global economic conditions (as well as increased pension expense) and the Compa-
ny’s objective to maximize its business results in light of these conditions.

Statements that are not historical facts, including statements about the Company’s beliefs and
expectations, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements can be identified by, among
other things, the use of forward-looking language such as “estimates,” “objectives,” “visions,” “projects,”
“forecasts,” “focus,” “drive towards,” “plans,” “targets,” “strategies,” “opportunities,” “drivers,” “believes,”
“intends,” “outlooks,” “initiatives,” “expects,” “scheduled to,” “anticipates,” “seeks,” “may,” “will,” or
“should” or the negative of those terms, or other variations of those terms or comparable language, or by

56

discussions of strategies, targets, models or intentions. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date
they are made, and except for the Company’s ongoing obligations under the U.S. federal securities laws, the
Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result
of new information, future events or otherwise.

Investors are advised, however, to consult any additional disclosures the Company made or may make
in its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K, in each case filed with the SEC in
2009 and 2008 (which, among other places, can be found on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov, as well
as on the Company’s website at www.revloninc.com). The information available from time to time on such
websites shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K. A number
of important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-
looking statement. In addition to factors that may be described in the Company’s filings with the SEC,
including this filing, the following factors, among others, could cause the Company’s actual results to differ
materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by the Company:

(i)

(ii)

(iii)

(iv)

unanticipated circumstances or results affecting the Company’s financial performance, includ-
ing decreased consumer spending in response to weak economic conditions or weakness in the
cosmetics category in the mass retail channel; changes in consumer preferences, such as reduced
consumer demand for the Company’s color cosmetics and other current products, including new
product launches; changes in consumer purchasing habits, including with respect to shopping
channels; lower than expected retail customer acceptance or consumer acceptance of, or less
than anticipated results from, the Company’s existing or new products; higher than expected
advertising and promotion expenses or lower than expected results from the Company’s
advertising and/or marketing plans; higher than expected returns or decreased sales of the
Company’s existing or new products; actions by the Company’s customers, such as retailer
inventory management and greater than anticipated retailer space reconfigurations or reduc-
tions in retail space and/or product discontinuances; and changes in the competitive environ-
ment and actions by the Company’s competitors,
including business combinations,
technological breakthroughs, new products offerings, increased advertising, marketing and
promotional spending and marketing and promotional successes by competitors, including
increases in share in the mass retail channel;

in addition to the items discussed in (i) above, the effects of and changes in economic conditions
(such as continued volatility in the financial markets, inflation, monetary conditions and foreign
currency fluctuations, as well as in trade, monetary, fiscal and tax policies in international
markets) and political conditions (such as military actions and terrorist activities);

unanticipated costs or difficulties or delays in completing projects associated with the continued
execution of the Company’s business strategy or lower than expected revenues or the inability
to create value through profitable growth as a result of such strategy, including lower than
expected sales, or higher than expected costs, including as may arise from any additional
repositioning, repackaging or reformulating of one or more of the Company’s brands or product
lines, launching of new product lines, including difficulties or delays, or higher than expected
expenses, including for returns, in launching its new products, acquiring businesses or brands,
further refining its approach to retail merchandising, and/or difficulties, delays or increased
costs in connection with taking further actions to optimize the Company’s manufacturing,
sourcing, supply chain or organizational size and structure;

difficulties, delays or unanticipated costs in executing the Company’s business strategy, which
could affect the Company’s ability to achieve its objectives as set forth in clause (iv) above, such
as (a) less than effective product development, less than expected growth of the Revlon or
Almay brands and/or in women’s hair color, beauty tools and/or anti-perspirants and deodor-
ants, such as due to less than expected acceptance of the Company’s new or existing products
under these brands and lines by consumers and/or retail customers, less than expected accep-
tance of the Company’s advertising, promotion and/or marketing plans by the Company’s

57

consumers and/or retail customers, disruptions, delays or difficulties in executing the Compa-
ny’s business strategy or less than expected investment in advertising or greater than expected
competitive investment and difficulties, delays, unanticipated costs or our inability to continue
to focus on the key growth drivers of our business, such as due to less than effective new product
development, less than expected acceptance of our new products by consumers and/or retail
customers, less than expected acceptance of our brand communication by consumers and/or
retail partners, less than expected levels of advertising and/or promotion for our new product
launches and/or less than expected levels of execution with our retail partners or higher than
expected costs and expenses; (b) difficulties, delays or the inability to improve the execution of
its strategies and plans and/or build organizational capability, recruit and retain skilled people,
provide employees with opportunities to develop professionally, provide employees who have
demonstrated capability with new and expanded responsibilities or roles and/or reward the
Company’s employees for success; (c) difficulties, delays or unanticipated costs in connection
with the Company’s plans to strengthen its international business further and/or improve
operating performance in our international business, such as due to higher than anticipated
levels of investment required to support and build the Company’s brands globally or less than
anticipated results from the Company’s national and multi-national brands; (d) difficulties,
delays or unanticipated costs in connection with the Company’s plans to improve its financial
performance through steady improvement in operating profit margins and cash flow generation
over time, such as difficulties, delays or the inability to take actions intended to improve sales
returns, cost of goods sold, general and administrative expenses, in working capital management
and/or sales growth; and/or (e) difficulties, delays or unanticipated costs in, or the Company’s
inability to improve its capital structure and/or consummate transactions to strengthening its
balance sheet and reduce debt over time, including higher than expected costs (including
interest rates);

difficulties, delays or unanticipated costs or less than expected savings and other benefits
resulting from the Company’s restructuring activities, such as less than anticipated cost reduc-
tions or other benefits from the 2008 Programs, 2007 Programs and/or 2006 Programs and the
risk that the 2008 Programs, 2007 Programs and/or the 2006 Programs may not satisfy the
Company’s objectives;

lower than expected operating revenues, cash on hand and/or funds available under the 2006
Revolving Credit Facility and/or other permitted lines of credit or higher than anticipated
operating expenses, such as referred to in clause (viii) below;

the unavailability of funds under Products Corporation’s 2006 Revolving Credit Facility or
other permitted lines of credit, or from restructuring indebtedness, or capital contributions or
loans from MacAndrews & Forbes, the Company’s other affiliates and/or third parties and/or
the sale of additional equity of Revlon, Inc. or debt securities of Revlon, Inc. or Products
Corporation;

(v)

(vi)

(vii)

(viii) higher than expected operating expenses, sales returns, working capital expenses, permanent
wall display costs, capital expenditures, restructuring costs, severance not otherwise included in
the Company’s restructuring programs, debt service payments, regularly scheduled cash pen-
sion plan contributions and/or post-retirement benefit plan contributions and benefit payments,
purchases of permanent wall displays and/or capital expenditures;

(ix)

interest rate or foreign exchange rate changes affecting the Company and its market-risk
sensitive financial instruments, including less than anticipated benefits or other unanticipated
effects of the Interest Rate Swaps and/or difficulties, delays or the inability of the counterparty
to perform the transaction;

(x)

unanticipated effects of the Company’s adoption of certain new accounting standards;

58

(xi)

(xii)

difficulties, delays or the inability of the Company to efficiently manage its cash and working
capital;

lower than expected returns on pension plan asset and/or discount rates, which could cause
higher than expected cash contributions and/or pension expense and/or a more than expected
adverse impact on the Company’s financial results and/or financial condition arising from
higher than expected pension expense and pension cash contributions to the Company’s
pension and other post-retirement benefit programs and other benefit payments; and/or

(xiii) difficulties, delays, unanticipated costs or the Company’s inability to maximize its business
results in light of certain conditions which the Company expects will impact its results in 2009,
including without limitation, from increased pension expense due to declines in pension asset
values and/or more than expected adverse foreign currency fluctuations and/or global economic
conditions, which may adversely affect the Company’s financial results, financial condition, cash
flows and/or its competitive position.

Factors other than those listed above could also cause the Company’s results to differ materially from
expected results. This discussion is provided as permitted by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995.

59

Part III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

A list of Revlon, Inc.’s executive officers and directors and biographical information and other
information about them may be found under the caption “Election of Directors” and “Executive Officers”
of Revlon, Inc.’s Proxy Statement for 2009 the Annual Stockholders Meeting (the “2009 Proxy State-
ment”), which sections are incorporated by reference herein.

The information set forth under the caption “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Com-

pliance” in the 2009 Proxy Statement is also incorporated herein by reference.

The information set forth under the captions “Compensation Discussion and Analysis”, “Executive
Compensation”, “Summary Compensation Table”, “Grants of Plan-Based Awards, “Outstanding Equity
Awards at Fiscal Year-End”, “Option Exercises and Stock Vested”, “Pension Benefits”, “Non-Qualified
Deferred Compensation” and “Director Compensation” in the 2009 Proxy Statement is also incorporated
herein by reference.

Information regarding the Company’s director nomination process, audit committee and audit com-
mittee financial expert matters may be found in the 2009 Proxy Statement under the captions “Corporate
Governance — Board of Directors and its Committees — Nominating and Corporate Governance Com-
mittee-Director Nominating Processes” and “Corporate Governance — Board of Directors and its Com-
mittees — Audit Committee — Composition of the Audit Committee”, respectively. That information is
incorporated herein by reference.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

The information set forth under the captions “Compensation Discussion and Analysis”, “Executive
Compensation”, “Summary Compensation Table”, “Grants of Plan-Based Awards”, “Outstanding Equity
Awards at Fiscal End”, “Option Exercises and Stock Vested”, “Pension Benefits”, “Non-Qualified Deferred
Compensation” and “Director Compensation” in the 2009 Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by
reference. The information set forth under the caption “ Corporate Governance — Board of Directors and
its Committees — Compensation and Stock Plan Committee — Composition of the Compensation Com-
mittee” and “— Compensation Committee Report” in the 2009 Proxy Statement is also incorporated
herein by reference.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder

Matters

The information set forth under the captions “Ownership of Common Stock” and “Equity Compen-

sation Plan Information” in the 2009 Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

The information set forth under the captions “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” and
“Corporate Governance — Board of Directors and its Committees — Controlled Company Exemption”
and “Corporate Governance — Board of Directors and its Committees — Audit Committee — Compo-
sition of the Audit Committee”, respectively, in the 2009 Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by
reference.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Information concerning principal accountant fees and services set forth under the caption “Audit Fees”

in the 2009 Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

60

Website Availability of Reports and Other Corporate Governance Information

The Company maintains a comprehensive corporate governance program, including Corporate
Governance Guidelines for Revlon, Inc.’s Board of Directors, Revlon, Inc.’s Board Guidelines for
Assessing Director Independence and charters for Revlon, Inc.’s Audit Committee, Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee and Compensation and Stock Plan Committee. Revlon, Inc. maintains
a corporate investor relations website, www.revloninc.com, where stockholders and other interested
persons may review, without charge, among other things, Revlon, Inc.’s corporate governance materials
and certain SEC filings (such as Revlon, Inc.’s annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, proxy statements, annual reports, Section 16 reports reflecting
certain changes in the stock ownership of Revlon, Inc.’s directors and Section 16 officers, and certain other
documents filed with the SEC), each of which are generally available on the same business day as the filing
date with the SEC on the SEC’s website http://www.sec.gov, as well as on the Company’s website
http://www.revloninc.com. In addition, under the section of the website entitled,“Corporate Governance,”
Revlon, Inc. posts printable copies of the latest versions of its Corporate Governance Guidelines, Board
Guidelines for Assessing Director Independence, charters for Revlon, Inc.’s Audit Committee, Nominating
and Corporate Governance Committee and Compensation and Stock Plan Committee, as well as Revlon,
Inc.’s Code of Business Conduct, which includes Revlon, Inc.’s Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers
and the Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy, each of which the Company will provide in print, without
charge, upon written request to Robert K. Kretzman, Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer,
Revlon, Inc., 237 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10017. The business and financial materials and any other
statement or disclosure on, or made available through, the websites referenced herein shall not be deemed
incorporated by reference into this report.

61

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

(a)

List of documents filed as part of this Report:

PART IV

(1) Consolidated Financial Statements and Independent Auditors’ Report included herein:

See Index on page F-1.

(2) Financial Statement Schedule: See Index on page F-1.

All other schedules are omitted as they are inapplicable or the required information is
furnished in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements or the Notes thereto.

(3) List of Exhibits:

Certificate of Incorporation and By-laws.

Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Revlon, Inc., dated April 30, 2004 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Revlon, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2004 filed with the SEC on May 17, 2004).

Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Revlon, Inc., dated
as of September 15, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Revlon, Inc.’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 16, 2008).

Amended and Restated By-Laws of Revlon, Inc. dated as of December 10, 2007 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of Revlon, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on
December 10, 2007).

Instruments Defining the Rights of Security Holders, Including Indentures.

Credit Agreement, dated as of July 9, 2004, among Revlon Consumer Products Corporation
(“Products Corporation”) and certain local borrowing subsidiaries, as borrowers, the lenders
and issuing lenders party thereto, Citicorp USA, Inc., as term loan administrative agent,
Citicorp USA, Inc. as multi-currency administrative agent, Citicorp USA, Inc., as collateral
agent, UBS Securities LLC, as syndication agent, and Citigroup Global Markets Inc., as sole
lead arranger and sole bookrunner (the “2004 Credit Agreement”) (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 4.34 to Products Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on
July 13, 2004).

First Amendment dated February 15, 2006 to the 2004 Credit Agreement (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Products Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
SEC on February 17, 2006).

Second Amendment dated as of July 28, 2006 to the 2004 Credit Agreement (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Products Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
SEC on July 28, 2006).

Third Amendment dated as of September 29, 2006 to the 2004 Credit Agreement,
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Products Corporation’s Current Report on
Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 29, 2006).

Fourth Amendment, dated as of December 20, 2006, to the 2004 Credit Agreement,
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Products Corporation’s Current Report on
Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 21, 2006 (the “Products Corporation
December 21, 2006 Form 8-K”)).

Amended and Restated Pledge and Security Agreement, dated as of December 20, 2006
among Revlon, Inc., Products Corporation and the additional grantors party thereto, in favor of
Citicorp USA, Inc. as collateral agent for the secured parties (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.3 to the Products Corporation December 21, 2006 Form 8-K).

62

3.

3.1

3.2

3.3

4.

4.1

4.2

4.3

4.4

4.5

4.6

4.7

4.8

4.9

10.

10.1

10.2

10.3

10.4

10.5

10.6

*10.7

*10.8

10.9

10.10

Amended and Restated Intercreditor and Collateral Agency Agreement, dated as of
December 20, 2006 among Citicorp USA, Inc., as administrative agent for the multi-
currency lenders and issuing lenders, Citicorp USA, Inc., as administrative agent for the
term loan lenders, Citicorp USA, Inc., as collateral agent for the secured parties, Revlon, Inc.,
Products Corporation and each other loan party (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to
the Products Corporation December 21, 2006 Form 8-K).

Term Loan Agreement, dated as of December 20, 2006 among Products Corporation, as
borrower, the lenders party thereto, Citicorp USA, Inc., as administrative agent and collateral
agent, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as syndication agent, and Citigroup Global Capital
Markets Inc., as sole lead arranger and sole bookrunner (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to the Products Corporation December 21, 2006 Form 8-K).

Indenture, dated as of March 16, 2005, between Products Corporation and U.S. Bank National
Association, as trustee, relating to Products Corporation’s 91⁄2% Senior Notes due 2011
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.12 to Products Corporation’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2004 filed with the SEC on April 12, 2005).

Material Contracts.

Tax Sharing Agreement, dated as of June 24, 1992, among MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings,
Revlon, Inc., Products Corporation and certain subsidiaries of Products Corporation, as
amended and restated as of January 1, 2001 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to
Products Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001
filed with the SEC on February 25, 2002).

Tax Sharing Agreement, dated as of March 26, 2004, by and among Revlon, Inc., Products
Corporation and certain subsidiaries of Products Corporation (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.25 to Products Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2004 filed with the SEC on May 17, 2004).

Employment Agreement, dated as of April 25, 2008 between Products Corporation and David
L. Kennedy (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Revlon, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 filed with the SEC on May 6, 2008 (the
“Revlon, Inc. 2008 First Quarter Form 10-Q”)).

Employment Agreement, dated as of April 25, 2008, between Products Corporation and Alan
T. Ennis (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Revlon, Inc. 2008 First Quarter
Form 10-Q).

Employment Agreement, dated as of April 25, 2008, between Products Corporation and
Robert K. Kretzman (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Revlon, Inc. 2008 First
Quarter Form 10-Q).

Third Amended and Restated Revlon, Inc. Stock Plan (as amended, the “Stock Plan”)
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Revlon, Inc.’s Registration Statement on
Form S-8 filed with the SEC on December 10, 2007).

Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement under the Stock Plan.

Form of Restricted Stock Agreement under the Stock Plan.

Revlon Executive Bonus Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to Products
Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 filed
with the SEC on August 9, 2005).

Amended and Restated Revlon Pension Equalization Plan, amended and restated as of
December 14, 1998 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to Revlon, Inc.’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 filed with the SEC on March 3,
1999).

63

10.11

10.12

10.13

10.14

10.15

10.16

10.17

Executive Supplemental Medical Expense Plan Summary, dated July 2000 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.10 to Revlon, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2002 filed with the SEC on March 21, 2003).

Benefit Plans Assumption Agreement, dated as of July 1, 1992, by and among Revlon Holdings,
Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to Products
Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1992 filed with
the SEC on March 12, 1993).

Revlon Executive Severance Pay Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Revlon,
Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 filed with the
SEC on November 7, 2006).

Stockholders Agreement, dated as of February 20, 2004, by and between Revlon, Inc. and
Fidelity Management & Research Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 to
Revlon, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 23, 2004).

MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan Agreement, dated as of January 30,
2008, between Products Corporation and MacAndrews & Forbes (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to Products Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on
February 1, 2008).

Amendment No. 1 to MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan Agreement,
dated as of November 14, 2008 between Products Corporation and MacAndrews & Forbes
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Products
Corporation filed with the SEC on November 14, 2008).

Letter Agreement between Revlon, Inc. and MacAndrews & Forbes, dated as of January 30,
2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Revlon, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on February 1, 2008).

21.

Subsidiaries.

*21.1

Subsidiaries of Revlon, Inc.

23.

Consents of Experts and Counsel.

*23.1

Consent of KPMG LLP.

24.

*24.1

*24.2

*24.3

*24.4

*24.5

*24.6

*24.7

*24.8

*24.9

Powers of Attorney.

Power of Attorney executed by Ronald O. Perelman.

Power of Attorney executed by Barry F. Schwartz.

Power of Attorney executed by Alan S. Bernikow.

Power of Attorney executed by Paul J. Bohan.

Power of Attorney executed by Meyer Feldberg.

Power of Attorney executed by Debra L. Lee.

Power of Attorney executed by Tamara Mellon.

Power of Attorney executed by Kathi P. Seifert.

Power of Attorney executed by Kenneth L. Wolfe.

64

*31.1

*31.2

32.1
(furnished
herewith)

32.2
(furnished
herewith)

Certification of David L. Kennedy, Chief Executive Officer, dated February 25, 2009,
pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act.

Certification of Alan T. Ennis, Chief Financial Officer, dated February 25, 2009, pursuant
to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act.

Certification of David L. Kennedy, Chief Executive Officer, dated February 25, 2009,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002.

Certification of Alan T. Ennis, Chief Financial Officer, dated February 25, 2009, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.

*99.1

Revlon, Inc. Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy.

* Filed herewith

65

[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

REVLON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULE

Page

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Consolidated Financial

Statements) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

F-2

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Internal Control Over

Financial Reporting) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

F-3

Audited Financial Statements:

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

F-4

Consolidated Statements of Operations for each of the years in the three-year period

ended December 31, 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

F-5

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Deficiency and Comprehensive Income (Loss)

for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . .

F-6

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the years in the three-year period

ended December 31, 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

F-8

F-9

Financial Statement Schedule:

Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

F-61

F-1

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Revlon, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Revlon, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ defi-
ciency and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2008. In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements, we also have
audited the financial statement schedule as listed on the index on page F-1. These consolidated financial
statements and the financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and the financial
statement schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An
audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management,
as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of Revlon, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the
results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2008, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion,
the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial
statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

As discussed in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company adopted FASB Interpre-
tation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” as of January 1, 2007 and SFAS No. 158,
“Employers’Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans — An Amendment
of FASB Statement No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R)”, as of December 31, 2006 for the recognition and disclosure
provisions and as of January 1, 2007 for the measurement date provisions.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the effectiveness of Revlon, Inc. and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO),
and our report dated February 25, 2009, expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ KPMG LLP

New York, New York
February 25, 2009

F-2

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders Revlon, Inc.:

We have audited Revlon, Inc. and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2008, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Revlon, Inc. and subsidiaries’ manage-
ment is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment
of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Manage-
ment’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting,
assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating
effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over
financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records
that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit prep-
aration of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that
receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding the prevention
and timely detection of any unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company’s assets that could
have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect
misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting as to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of
changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, Revlon, Inc. and subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Inte-
grated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO).

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Revlon, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31,
2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ deficiency and
comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2008, and our report dated February 25, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion on those
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule.

/s/ KPMG LLP

New York, New York
February 25, 2009

F-3

REVLON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(dollars in millions, except share and per share amounts)

ASSETS
Current assets:

Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Trade receivables, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $3.3 and

$3.5 as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prepaid expenses and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Assets of discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Property, plant and equipment, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Goodwill, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

December 31,
2008

December 31,
2007

$

52.8

$

45.1

169.9
154.2
51.3
0.3

428.5
112.8
89.5
182.6

196.2
165.7
47.6
21.4

476.0
112.7
117.9
182.7

Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

813.4

$

889.3

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY
Current liabilities:

Short-term borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Current portion of long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued expenses and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Current liabilities of discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term debt — affiliates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term pension and other post-retirement plan liabilities . . . . . . . . . .
Other long-term liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other long-term liabilities of discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stockholders’ deficiency:

Class B Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share;

200,000,000 shares authorized, 3,125,000 issued and outstanding as
of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Class A Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share;

900,000,000 shares authorized and 50,150,355 and 49,292,340 shares
issued as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Additional paid-in capital
Treasury stock, at cost; 256,453 and 130,579 shares of Class A

Common Stock as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. . . .
Accumulated deficit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accumulated other comprehensive loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total stockholders’ deficiency. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

0.5
18.9
78.1
225.0
0.9

323.4
1,203.2
107.0
223.7
67.2
1.7

$

1.7
6.5
88.5
243.0
9.0

348.7
1,432.4
—
112.4
75.9
1.9

—

—

0.5
1,000.9

(3.6)
(1,927.5)
(183.1)

(1,112.8)

0.5
994.1

(2.5)
(1,985.4)
(88.7)

(1,082.0)

Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficiency . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

813.4

$

889.3

(a) All outstanding share amounts have been retroactively restated to reflect Revlon, Inc.’s September 2008 1-for-10 Reverse Stock

Split. See Note 13, “Stockholders’ Equity”.

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

F-4

REVLON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(dollars in millions, except share and per share amounts)

Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cost of sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

1,346.8 $
490.9

$

1,367.1
505.7

1,298.7
527.7

Year Ended December 31,
2007

2008

2006

Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Selling, general and administrative expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Restructuring costs and other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Operating income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other expenses (income):

Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortization of debt issuance costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign currency (gains) losses, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Miscellaneous, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other expenses, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Income (Loss) from continuing operations before income

taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Provision for income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Income (Loss) from continuing operations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of taxes . . .
Gain on disposal of discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Income from discontinued operations, including gain on

disposal, net of taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

855.9
709.3
(8.4)

155.0

119.7
(0.7)
5.6
0.1
1.1

125.8

29.2
16.1

13.1
(0.4)
45.2

44.8

861.4
735.7
7.3

118.4

135.6
(1.9)
3.3
(6.8)
(0.3)

129.9

(11.5)
7.5

(19.0)
2.9
—

771.0
795.6
27.4

(52.0)

147.7
(1.1)
7.5
(1.5)
27.4

180.0

(232.0)
20.1

(252.1)
0.8
—

2.9

0.8

Net income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

57.9 $

(16.1) $

(251.3)

Basic income (loss) per common share:

Continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

0.26
0.87

(0.38)
0.06

Net income (loss). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

1.13 $

(0.32) $

Diluted income (loss) per common share:

Continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

0.26
0.87

(0.38)
0.06

Net income (loss). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

1.13 $

(0.32) $

(6.04)
0.02

(6.03)

(6.04)
0.02

(6.03)

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding(a):
Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

51,248,710

50,437,264

41,705,429

Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

51,311,010

50,437,264

41,705,429

(a) All outstanding share and per share amounts have been retroactively restated to reflect Revlon, Inc.’s September 2008 1-for-10

Reverse Stock Split. See Note 13, “Stockholders’ Equity”.

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

F-5

REVLON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(dollars in millions)

Additional
Paid-In-
Capital
(Capital
Deficiency)(h)

Common
Stock(h)

$0.3
0.1

$ 768.2
107.1

Treasury
Stock

Accumulated
Deficit

Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss(c)

Total
Stockholders’
Deficiency

$(0.8)

$(1,741.9)

$(121.7)

Balance, January 1, 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net proceeds from $110 Million Rights Offering . . . . .
Treasury stock acquired, at cost(a)
. . . . . . . . . . . .
Stock option compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exercise of stock options for common stock . . . . . .
Amortization of deferred compensation for

restricted stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Comprehensive loss:

Net loss. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Revaluation of foreign currency forward exchange
contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Currency translation adjustment . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adjustment for minimum pension liability(b) . . . .
Total comprehensive loss(c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net adjustment to initially apply SFAS No. 158, net
of tax(c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Balance, December 31, 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SFAS No. 158 adjustment(d) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adjustment for adoption of FIN 48(e) . . . . . . . . . .
Adjusted balance, January 1, 2007 . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net proceeds from $100 Million Rights Offering

(See Note 13) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Treasury stock acquired, at cost(a)
. . . . . . . . . . . .
Stock option compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortization of deferred compensation for

restricted stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Comprehensive (loss) income:

Net loss. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Revaluation of financial derivative

instruments(f). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Currency translation adjustment . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unrealized gains under SFAS No. 158(g) . . . . . . .
Total comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Balance, December 31, 2007 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Treasury stock acquired, at cost(a)
. . . . . . . . . . . .
Stock option compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortization of deferred compensation for

restricted stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Comprehensive (loss) income:

Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Revaluation of financial derivative

instruments(i) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Elimination of currency translation adjustment

related to Bozzano Sale Transaction(h)

. . . . . .
Currency translation adjustment . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unrealized losses under SFAS No. 158(g)
. . . . . .
Total comprehensive loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(0.6)

7.1
0.2

6.0

0.4

0.4

0.1

888.6

(1.4)

(1.4)

(1.1)

888.6

98.8

1.5

5.2

(251.3)

(1,993.2)
(2.9)
26.8

(1,969.3)

(16.1)

(0.1)
3.2
19.0

(24.6)

(124.2)
10.3

(113.9)

(1.7)
(2.0)
28.9

0.5

994.1

(2.5)
(1.1)

(1,985.4)

(88.7)

0.3

6.5

57.9

(3.3)

37.3
(8.2)
(120.2)

$(1,095.9)
107.2
(0.6)
7.1
0.2

6.0

(251.3)

(0.1)
3.2
19.0

(229.2)

(24.6)

(1,229.8)
7.4
26.8

(1,195.6)

98.9
(1.1)
1.5

5.2

(16.1)

(1.7)
(2.0)
28.9

9.1

(1,082.0)
(1.1)
0.3

6.5

57.9

(3.3)

37.3
(8.2)
(120.2)
(36.5)

Balance, December 31, 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$0.5

$1,000.9

$(3.6)

$(1,927.5)

$(183.1)

$(1,112.8)

(a) Pursuant to the share withholding provision of the Third Amended and Restated Revlon, Inc. Stock Plan, certain employees and
executives, in lieu of paying withholding taxes on the vesting of certain restricted stock, authorized the withholding of an
aggregate 125,874; 87,613 and 19,335 shares of Revlon, Inc. Class A Common Stock (as adjusted for Revlon, Inc.’s September 2008
1-for-10 Reverse Stock Split — See Note 13, “Stockholders’ Equity”) during 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively, to satisfy the
minimum statutory tax withholding requirements related to such vesting. These shares were recorded as treasury stock using the
cost method, at, respectively, $8.99, $12.89 and $30.13 weighted average per share of the closing price of Revlon, Inc. Class A

F-6

Common Stock as reported on the NYSE consolidated tape on the respective vesting dates (in each case as adjusted for Revlon,
Inc.’s September 2008 1-for-10 Reverse Stock Split), for a total of $1.1 million.

(b) Amount relates to the 2006 adjustment for minimum pension liability in accordance with SFAS No. 87,“Employers’Accounting

for Pensions”. (See Note 12, “Savings Plan, Pension and Post-retirement Benefits”).

(c)

In December 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other
Postretirement Plans” (“SFAS No. 158”). As a result, a net adjustment of $(24.6) million was recorded to the ending balance of
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss. (See Note 12, “Savings Plan, Pension and Post-retirement Benefits”).

(d) Due to the Company’s early adoption of the provisions under SFAS No. 158, effective as of January 1, 2007 requiring a
measurement date for determining defined benefit plan assets and obligations using the Company’s fiscal year end of Decem-
ber 31st, rather than using a September 30th measurement date, the Company recognized a net reduction to the beginning
balance of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss of $10.3 million, as set forth in the table above, which is comprised of (1) a
$9.4 million reduction to Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss due to the revaluation of the pension liability as a result of the
change in the measurement date and (2) a $0.9 million reduction to Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss of amortization of
prior service costs, actuarial gains/losses and return on assets over the period from October 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006. In
addition, the Company recognized a $2.9 million increase to the beginning balance of Accumulated Deficit, as set forth in the
table above, which represents the total net periodic benefit costs incurred from October 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006. (See
Note 12, “Savings Plan, Pension and Post-retirement Benefits”).

(e) Due to the Company’s adoption of FIN 48,“Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an interpretation of SFAS No. 109”
effective for the fiscal year beginning January 1, 2007, the Company reduced its total tax reserves by $26.8 million, which resulted
in a corresponding reduction to the accumulated deficit component of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), as set
forth in the table above. (See Note 11, “Income Taxes”).

(f) Due to the Company’s use of derivative financial instruments, the net amount of hedge accounting derivative losses recognized by
the Company, as set forth in the table above, pertains to (1) the reversal of $0.4 million of net losses accumulated in Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Loss at January 1, 2007 upon the Company’s election during the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007 to
discontinue the application of hedge accounting under SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities” for certain derivative financial instruments, as the Company no longer designates its foreign currency forward
exchange contracts as hedging instruments; (2) the reversal of a $0.4 million gain pertaining to a net receipt settlement in
December 2007 under the terms of Products Corporation’s floating-to-fixed interest rate swap transaction, executed in Sep-
tember 2007, with a notional amount of $150 million relating to indebtedness under Products Corporation’s 2006 Term Loan
Facility; and (3) $1.7 million of net losses accumulated in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss pertaining to the change in fair
value of the above-mentioned floating-to fixed interest rate swap. The Company has designated Products Corporation’s floating-
to-fixed interest rate swap executed in September 2007, as well as Products Corporation’s floating-to-fixed interest rate swap
transaction executed in April 2008, with a notional amount of $150 million relating to indebtedness under Products Corporation’s
2006 Term Loan Facility as hedging instruments and accordingly applies hedge accounting under SFAS No. 133 to such swap
transactions. (See Note 10, “Financial Instruments” to the Consolidated Financial Statements and the discussion of Critical
Accounting Policies in this Form 10-K).

(g) Amount represents a change in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) as a result of the amortization of unrec-
ognized prior service costs and actuarial gains/losses arising during 2007 and 2008 related to the Company’s pension and other
post-retirement plans. (See Note 13, “Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss”).

(h) For detail on the Bozzano Sale Transaction (as hereinafter defined) see Note 2, “Discontinued Operations”.

(i) Amount relates to (1) net unrealized losses of $5.3 million on the 2007 and 2008 Interest Rate Swaps (see Note 10, “Financial
Instruments” to the Consolidated Financial Statements and the discussion of Critical Accounting Policies in this Form 10-K) and
(2) the reversal of amounts recorded in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) pertaining to net settlement receipts
of $0.2 million and net settlement payments of $2.2 million on the 2007 and 2008 Interest Rate Swaps.

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

F-7

REVLON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(dollars in millions)

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:

Loss (income) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortization of debt discount . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stock compensation amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loss on early extinguishment of debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on disposal of discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on sale of non-core trademark and certain assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Change in assets and liabilities:

Decrease in trade receivables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Decrease in inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Decrease in accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Decrease in accrued expenses and other current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchase of permanent displays . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Capital expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from the sale of assets of discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from the sale of a non-core trademark and certain assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings and overdraft.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Repayment) borrowings under the 2006 Revolving Credit Facility, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Borrowings under the 2004 Term Loan Facility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Borrowings under the 2006 Term Loan Facility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt — affiliates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Repayment of long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Repayment of long-term debt — affiliates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net Proceeds from the $110 Million Rights Offering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net Proceeds from the $100 Million Rights Offering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options for common stock. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Payment of financing costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CASH FLOWS FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS ACTIVITIES:
Net cash (used in) provided by discontinued operating activities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash used in discontinued investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash (used in) provided by discontinued financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Change in cash from discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash (used in) provided by discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Supplemental Schedule of Cash Flow Information:

Cash paid during the period for:

December 31,
2007

2006

2008

$ 57.9

$(16.1)

$(251.3)

0.4
91.9
0.7
6.8
0.7
(45.2)
(12.7)

13.0
1.8
(5.9)
(10.4)
(18.4)
(47.2)
(0.3)
33.1

(20.7)
107.6
13.6
100.5

3.1
(43.5)
—
—
—
170.0
(173.9)
(63.0)
—
—
—
(4.6)
(111.9)

(2.9)
99.6
0.6
6.7
0.1
—
(0.6)

9.3
21.0
7.1
(5.6)
(78.3)
(49.8)
9.2
0.3

(19.8)
—
2.4
(17.4)

(5.4)
(14.0)
—
—
0.7
—
(50.2)
—
—
98.9
—
(0.9)
29.1

(0.8)
122.4
0.6
13.1
23.5
—
0.3

78.7
36.2
0.2
(29.7)
(69.9)
(98.5)
35.5
(139.7)

(22.1)
—
—
(22.1)

(9.4)
57.5
100.0
840.0
—
—
(917.8)
—
107.2
—
0.2
(14.8)
162.9

(10.8)
—
(0.4)
(1.0)
(12.2)
(1.8)
7.7
45.1
$ 52.8

3.5
(0.2)
(4.6)
(1.3)
(2.6)
0.5
9.9
35.2
$ 45.1

1.1
(0.3)
0.3
—
1.1
0.8
3.0
32.2
$ 35.2

Interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income taxes, net of refunds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 123.0
$ 14.4

$137.6
$ 14.6

$ 155.6
$ 12.5

Supplemental Schedule of Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities:

Treasury stock received to satisfy minimum tax withholding liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

1.1

$ 1.1

$

0.6

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

F-8

REVLON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts in millions, except share and per share amounts)

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation:

Revlon, Inc. (and together with its subsidiaries, the “Company”) conducts its business exclusively
through its direct wholly-owned operating subsidiary, Revlon Consumer Products Corporation and its
subsidiaries (“Products Corporation”). The Company operates in a single segment and manufactures and
sells an extensive array of cosmetics, women’s hair color, beauty tools, fragrances, skincare, anti-perspirants/
deodorants and other personal care products. The Company’s principal customers include large mass
volume retailers and chain drug stores in the U.S., as well as certain department stores and other specialty
stores, such as perfumeries, outside the U.S. The Company also sells beauty products to U.S. military
exchanges and commissaries and has a licensing business, pursuant to which the Company licenses certain
of its key brand names to third parties for complementary beauty-related products and accessories.

Unless the context otherwise requires, all references to the Company mean Revlon, Inc. and its
subsidiaries. Revlon, Inc., as a public holding company, has no business operations of its own and has, as its
only material asset, all of the outstanding capital stock of Products Corporation. As such, its net income
(loss) has historically consisted predominantly of the net income (loss) of Products Corporation, and in
2008, 2007 and 2006 included approximately $7.7 million, $7.0 million and $6.6 million, respectively, in
expenses incidental to being a public holding company.

Revlon, Inc. is a direct and indirect majority-owned subsidiary of MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings Inc.
(“MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings” and, together with certain of its affiliates other than the Company,
“MacAndrews & Forbes”), a corporation wholly-owned by Ronald O. Perelman.

The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company after

elimination of all material intercompany balances and transactions.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in
the U.S. requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods presented. Actual results could differ from
these estimates. Estimates and assumptions are reviewed periodically and the effects of revisions are
reflected in the consolidated financial statements in the period they are determined to be necessary.
Significant estimates made in the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include, but are not
limited to, allowances for doubtful accounts, inventory valuation reserves, expected sales returns and
allowances, certain assumptions related to the recoverability of intangible and long-lived assets, reserves for
estimated tax liabilities, restructuring costs, certain estimates and assumptions used in the calculation of the
fair value of stock options issued to employees and non-employee directors and the derived compensation
expense and certain estimates regarding the calculation of the net periodic benefit costs and the projected
benefit obligation for the Company’s pension and other post-retirement plans, including the expected long
term return on pension plan assets and the discount rate used to value the Company’s year-end pension
benefit obligations.

The economic conditions in late 2008 and early 2009 and the volatility in the financial markets in late
2008 and early 2009, both in the U.S. and in many other countries where the Company operates, have
contributed and may continue to contribute to higher unemployment levels, decreased consumer spending,
reduced credit availability and/or declining business and consumer confidence. Such conditions could have
an impact on consumer purchases and/or retail customer purchases of the Company’s products, which could
result in a reduction of sales, operating income and cash flows and could have a material adverse impact on
the Company’s significant estimates discussed above and liquidity as discussed in Note 9, “Long-Term
Debt”.

F-9

Certain prior year amounts in this Annual Report on Form 10-K have been adjusted to reflect the
reclassification of a discontinued operation as a result of the Bozzano Sale Transaction (as hereinafter
defined) (See Note 2, “Discontinued Operations”) and also retroactively restated to reflect the impact of
Revlon, Inc.’s September 2008 1-for-10 Reverse Stock Split. See Note 13, “Stockholders’ Equity”.

Cash and Cash Equivalents:

Cash equivalents are primarily investments in high-quality, short-term money market instruments with
original maturities of three months or less and are carried at cost, which approximates fair value. Cash
equivalents were $21.9 million and $8.1 million as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Accounts
payable includes $11.0 million and $7.4 million of outstanding checks not yet presented for payment at
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

In accordance with borrowing arrangements with certain financial institutions, Products Corporation is
permitted to borrow against its cash balances. The cash available to Products Corporation is the net of the
cash position less amounts supporting these short-term borrowings. The cash balances and related bor-
rowings are shown gross in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007,
the Company had no such borrowing arrangements against its cash balances. (See Note 8, “Short-Term
Borrowings”).

Accounts Receivable:

Accounts receivable represent payments due to the Company for previously recognized net sales,
reduced by an allowance for doubtful accounts for balances which are estimated to be uncollectible at
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The Company grants credit terms in the normal course of
business to its customers. Trade credit is extended based upon periodically updated evaluations of each
customer’s ability to perform its obligations. The Company does not normally require collateral or other
security to support credit sales. The allowance for doubtful accounts is determined based on historical
experience and ongoing evaluations of the Company’s receivables and evaluations of the risks of payment.
Accounts receivable balances are recorded against the allowance for doubtful accounts when they are
deemed uncollectible. Recoveries of accounts receivable previously recorded against the allowance are
recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Operations when received. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, the
Company’s three largest customers accounted for an aggregate of approximately 30% and 35%, respec-
tively, of outstanding accounts receivable.

Inventories:

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market value. Cost is principally determined by the
first-in, first-out method. The Company records adjustments to the value of inventory based upon its
forecasted plans to sell its inventories, as well as planned product discontinuances. The physical condition
(e.g., age and quality) of the inventories is also considered in establishing the valuation. These adjustments
are estimates, which could vary significantly, either favorably or unfavorably, from the amounts that the
Company may ultimately realize upon the disposition of inventories if future economic conditions,
customer inventory levels, product discontinuances, return levels or competitive conditions differ from
the Company’s estimates and expectations.

Property, Plant and Equipment and Other Assets:

Property, plant and equipment is recorded at cost and is depreciated on a straight-line basis over the
estimated useful lives of such assets as follows: land improvements, 20 to 40 years; buildings and improve-
ments, 5 to 45 years; machinery and equipment, 3 to 17 years; and office furniture and fixtures and
capitalized software, 2 to 12 years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over their estimated useful lives
or the terms of the leases, whichever is shorter. Repairs and maintenance are charged to operations as
incurred, and expenditures for additions and improvements are capitalized.

F-10

Long-lived assets, including fixed assets and intangibles other than goodwill, are reviewed for
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset
may not be recoverable. If events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset
may not be recoverable, the Company estimates the undiscounted future cash flows (excluding interest)
resulting from the use of the asset and its ultimate disposition. If the sum of the undiscounted cash flows
(excluding interest) is less than the carrying value, the Company recognizes an impairment loss, measured
as the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the asset.

Included in other assets are net permanent wall displays amounting to approximately $56.1 million and
$78.1 million as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, which are amortized over a period of 1 to
3 years in the U.S. and generally over 3 to 5 years outside of the U.S. In the event of product discontinuances,
from time to time the Company may accelerate the amortization of related permanent wall displays based
on the estimated remaining useful life of the asset. Amortization expense for permanent wall displays for
2008, 2007 and 2006 was $65.8 million, $73.8 million and $85.7 million, respectively. The Company has
included, in other assets, net costs related to the issuance of Products Corporation’s debt instruments
amounting to approximately $16.3 million and $19.1 million as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively,
which are amortized over the terms of the related debt instruments. In addition, the Company has included,
in other assets, trademarks, net, of $6.9 million and $7.8 million as of December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively, and patents, net, of $0.9 million and $0.8 million as of December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. Patents and trademarks are recorded at cost and amortized ratably over approximately
10 years. Amortization expense for patents and trademarks for 2008, 2007 and 2006 was $1.9 million,
$1.9 million and $2.2 million, respectively.

Intangible Assets Related to Businesses Acquired:

Intangible assets related to businesses acquired principally consist of goodwill, which represents the
excess purchase price over the fair value of assets acquired. The Company accounts for its goodwill and
intangible assets in accordance with SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”, and does not
amortize its goodwill. The Company reviews its goodwill for impairment at least annually, or whenever
events or changes in circumstances would indicate possible impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 142.
The Company performs its annual impairment test of goodwill as of September 30 and performed the
annual test as of each of September 30, 2008 and 2007 and concluded that no impairment existed at either
date. The Company operates in one reportable segment, which is also the only reporting unit for purposes of
SFAS No. 142. Since the Company currently only has one reporting unit, all of the goodwill has been
assigned to the enterprise as a whole. The Company compared its estimated fair value of the enterprise as
measured by, among other factors, its market capitalization to its net assets and since the fair value of the
enterprise was substantially greater than the enterprise’s net assets, the Company concluded that as of
December 31, 2008 there was no impairment of goodwill. The amount outstanding for goodwill, net, was
$182.5 million and $182.7 million at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Accumulated amortization
of goodwill aggregated $117.4 million and $117.3 million at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Amortization of goodwill ceased as of January 1, 2002 upon the Company’s adoption of SFAS No. 142.

In accordance with SFAS No. 142, the Company’s intangible assets with finite useful lives are
amortized over their respective estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values, and reviewed
for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances would indicate possible impairment in
accordance with FASB Statement No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets”.

Revenue Recognition:

Sales are recognized when revenue is realized or realizable and has been earned. The Company’s
policy is to recognize revenue when risk of loss and title to the product transfers to the customer. Net sales is
comprised of gross revenues less expected returns, trade discounts and customer allowances, which include
costs associated with off-invoice mark-downs and other price reductions, as well as trade promotions and
coupons. These incentive costs are recognized at the later of the date on which the Company recognizes the

F-11

related revenue or the date on which the Company offers the incentive. The Company allows customers to
return their unsold products if and when they meet certain Company-established criteria as outlined in the
Company’s trade terms. The Company regularly reviews and revises, when deemed necessary, its estimates
of sales returns based primarily upon the historical rate of actual product returns, planned product
discontinuances, new product launches, estimates of customer inventory and promotional sales, which
would permit customers to return items based upon the Company’s trade terms. The Company records sales
returns as a reduction to sales and cost of sales, and an increase to accrued liabilities and inventories.
Returned products, which are recorded as inventories, are valued based upon the amount that the Company
expects to realize upon their subsequent disposition. The physical condition and marketability of the
returned products are the major factors considered by the Company in estimating realizable value. Actual
returns, as well as realized values on returned products, may differ significantly, either favorably or
unfavorably, from the Company’s estimates if factors such as product discontinuances, customer inventory
levels or competitive conditions differ from the Company’s estimates and expectations and, in the case of
actual returns, if economic conditions differ significantly from the Company’s estimates and expectations.
Revenues derived from licensing arrangements, including any pre-payments, are recognized in the period in
which they become due and payable, but not before the initial license term commences.

Cost of Sales:

Cost of sales includes all of the costs to manufacture the Company’s products. For products manu-
factured in the Company’s own facilities, such costs include raw materials and supplies, direct labor and
factory overhead. For products manufactured for the Company by third-party contractors, such costs
represent the amounts invoiced by the contractors. Cost of sales also includes the cost of refurbishing
products returned by customers that will be offered for resale and the cost of inventory write-downs
associated with adjustments of held inventories to net realizable value. These costs are reflected in the
statement of operations when the product is sold and net sales revenues are recognized or, in the case of
inventory write-downs, when circumstances indicate that the carrying value of inventories is in excess of its
recoverable value. Additionally, cost of sales reflects the costs associated with any free products. These
incentive costs are recognized on the later of the date that the Company recognizes the related revenue or
the date on which the Company offers the incentive.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses:

Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) include expenses to advertise the Company’s
products, such as television advertising production costs and air-time costs, print advertising costs, pro-
motional displays and consumer promotions. SG&A also includes the amortization of permanent wall
displays and intangible assets, distribution costs (such as freight and handling), non-manufacturing over-
head, principally personnel and related expenses, insurance and professional fees.

Advertising:

Advertising within SG&A includes television, print and other advertising production costs which are
expensed the first time the advertising takes place. The costs of promotional displays are expensed in the
period in which they are shipped to customers. Advertising expenses were $260.2 million, $287.1 million and
$298.0 million for 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and were included in SG&A in the Company’s
Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company also has various arrangements with customers
pursuant to its trade terms to reimburse them for a portion of their advertising costs, which provide
advertising benefits to the Company. Additionally, from time to time the Company may pay fees to
customers in order to expand or maintain shelf space for its products. The costs that the Company incurs for
“cooperative” advertising programs, end cap placement, shelf placement costs and slotting fees, if any, are
expensed as incurred and are netted against revenues on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of
Operations.

F-12

Distribution Costs:

Costs, such as freight and handling costs, associated with product distribution are expensed within
SG&A when incurred. Distribution costs were $65.5 million, $65.6 million and $65.1 million for 2008, 2007
and 2006, respectively.

Income Taxes:

Income taxes are calculated using the asset and liability method in accordance with the provisions of

SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“SFAS No. 109”).

Effective as of January 1, 2007, the Company adopted FASB Financial Interpretation Number (“FIN”)
48 (“FIN 48”), “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an interpretation of SFAS No. 109”. This
interpretation provides guidance on recognition and measurement for uncertainties in income taxes
recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109. FIN 48 prescribes
a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measure-
ment of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on
derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.
See Note 11, “Income Taxes”.

Research and Development:

Research and development expenditures are expensed as incurred. The amounts charged against
earnings in 2008, 2007 and 2006 for research and development expenditures were $24.3 million, $24.4 million
and $24.4 million, respectively.

Foreign Currency Translation:

Assets and liabilities of foreign operations are translated into U.S. dollars at the rates of exchange in
effect at the balance sheet date. Income and expense items are translated at the weighted average exchange
rates prevailing during each period presented. Gains and losses resulting from foreign currency transactions
are included in the results of operations. Gains and losses resulting from translation of financial statements
of foreign subsidiaries and branches operating in non-hyperinflationary economies are recorded as a
component of accumulated other comprehensive loss until either sale or upon complete or substantially
complete liquidation by the Company of its investment in a foreign entity. To the extent that foreign
subsidiaries and branches operate in hyperinflationary economies, non-monetary assets and liabilities are
translated at historical rates and translation adjustments are included in the results of operations.

Basic and Diluted Loss per Common Share and Classes of Stock:

Shares used in basic loss per share are computed using the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding each period. Shares used in diluted loss per share include the dilutive effect of unvested
restricted shares and outstanding stock options under the Stock Plan (as hereinafter defined) using the
treasury stock method. At December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, options to purchase 1,405,486; 2,168,096; and
2,499,301 shares of Revlon, Inc. Class A common stock, par value of $0.01 per share (the “Class A Common
Stock”), with weighted average exercise prices of $36.76, $41.94 and $45.40, respectively, and 1,639,906;
1,164,806; and 812,064 shares of unvested restricted stock were excluded from the calculation of diluted
earnings (loss) per common share as their effect would be antidilutive.

For each period presented, the amount of income (loss) used in the calculation of diluted income (loss)
per common share was the same as the amount of income (loss) used in the calculation of basic income
(loss) per common share.

Stock-Based Compensation:

Effective as of January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(“SFAS”) No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS No. 123(R)”). This statement replaces

F-13

SFAS No. 123,“Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS No. 123”) and supersedes APB No. 25.
SFAS No. 123(R) requires that effective for fiscal periods ending after December 31, 2005 all stock-based
compensation be recognized as an expense, net of the effect of expected forfeitures, in the financial
statements and that such expense be measured at the fair value of the Company’s stock-based awards and
generally recognized over the grantee’s required service period. The Company uses the modified prospec-
tive method of application, which requires recognition of compensation expense on a prospective basis.
Therefore, the Company’s financial statements for fiscal periods ended on or before December 31, 2005
have not been restated to reflect compensation expense in respect of awards of stock options under the
Stock Plan. Under this method, in addition to reflecting compensation expense for new share-based awards
granted on or after January 1, 2006, expense is also recognized to reflect the remaining service period
(generally, the vesting period of the award) of awards that had been included in the Company’s pro forma
disclosures in fiscal periods ended on or before December 31, 2005. For stock option awards, the Company
has continued to recognize stock option compensation expense using the accelerated attribution method
under FASB FIN 28, “Accounting for Stock Appreciation Rights and Other Variable Stock Option or
Award Plans”. For stock option awards granted after January 1, 2006, the Company recognizes stock option
compensation expense based on the estimated grant date fair value using the Black-Scholes option
valuation model using a straight-line amortization method. SFAS No. 123(R) also requires that excess
tax benefits related to stock option exercises be reflected as financing cash inflows instead of operating cash
inflows. For the year ended December 31, 2008, no adjustments have been made to the cash flow statement,
as any excess tax benefits that would have been realized have been fully provided for, given the Company’s
historical losses and deferred tax valuation allowance.

Derivative Financial Instruments:

The Company is exposed to certain risks relating to it ongoing business operations. The primary risks
managed by using derivative financial instruments are foreign currency exchange rate risk and interest rate
risk. The Company uses derivative financial instruments, primarily (1) foreign currency forward exchange
contracts, for the purpose of managing foreign currency exchange risks by reducing certain effects of
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and (2) interest rate swap transactions for the purpose of
managing interest rate risks by offseting certain effects of floating interest rates associated with a portion of
Products Corporation’s indebtedness. Products Corporation’s foreign currency forward exchange contracts
are entered into primarily for the purpose of hedging anticipated inventory purchases and certain inter-
company payments denomiated in foreign currencies and generally have maturities of less than one year. In
September 2007 and April 2008, Products Corporation executed two floating-to-fixed interest rate swap
transactions (the “2007 Interest Rate Swap” and the “2008 Interest Rate Swap” and together the “Interest
Rate Swaps”), each with a notional amount of $150.0 million over a period of two years relating to
indebtedness under Products Corporation’s 2006 Term Loan Facility (as hereinafter defined).

Foreign Currency Forward Exchange Contracts

While the Company continues to utilize derivative financial instruments, in the case of foreign currency
forward exchange contracts, for the purpose of reducing the effects of fluctuations in foreign currency
exchange rates in connection with its inventory purchases and intercompany payments, during the fiscal
quarter ended March 31, 2007 the Company elected to discontinue the application of hedge accounting
under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS No. 133”) effective as of January 1, 2007, in respect of such
foreign currency contracts. Accordingly, effective as of January 1, 2007, the Company no longer designates
its foreign currency forward exchange contracts as hedging instruments. By removing such designation, any
changes in the fair value of Products Corporation’s foreign currency forward exchange contracts subsequent
to the Company’s discontinuance of hedge accounting are recognized in the Company’s earnings. Also,
upon the removal of the hedging designation, any unrecognized gains (losses) accumulated in Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Loss related to the Company’s prior application of hedge accounting in respect of
such foreign currency contracts was fixed and was recognized in the Company’s earnings as the underlying
transactions pertaining to the derivative instrument occur. If the underlying transaction is not forecasted to

F-14

occur, the related gain (loss) accumulated in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss is recognized in the
Company’s earnings immediately.

The U.S. dollar notional amount of the foreign currency forward exchange contracts outstanding at
December 31, 2008 and 2007 was $41.0 million and $23.6 million, respectively. During 2008, net gains of
$1.9 million from expired derivative instruments were recognized into earnings. At December 31, 2007, the
change in the fair value of Products Corporation’s unexpired foreign currency forward exchange contracts
subsequent to the Company’s discontinuance of hedge accounting effective as of January 1, 2007 was
$0.1 million, which was recognized in the Company’s earnings. During 2007, net losses of $2.2 million from
expired derivative instruments related to foreign currency forward exchange contracts were recognized into
earnings and net derivative losses related to foreign currency forward exchange contracts of $0.4 million
were reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss into the Company’s earnings as a result of
discontinuing the application of hedge accounting.

During 2008, 2007 and 2006, net derivative losses related to foreign currency forward exchange
contracts of nil, $0.4 million and $0.3 million, respectively, were reclassified to the Company’s Statement of
Operations. The fair value of the foreign currency foreign exchange contracts outstanding at December 31,
2008 and 2007 was $2.0 million and $(0.3) million, respectively and is recorded in “Prepaid expenses and
other” in the amount of $2.2 million and $0.1 million, respectively, and in “Accrued expenses and other” in
the amount of $0.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively in the Company’s accompanying Consolidated
Balance Sheets. There were no unrecognized gains (losses) related to foreign currency forward exchange
contracts accumulated in other comprehensive loss at December 31, 2008 and 2007.

Interest Rate Swap Transactions

In September 2007 and April 2008, Products Corporation executed two floating-to-fixed interest rate
swap transactions, each with a notional amount of $150.0 million over a period of two years relating to
indebtedness under Products Corporation’s 2006 Term Loan Facility. The Company designated the Interest
Rate Swaps as cash flow hedges of the variable interest rate payments under Products Corporation’s 2006
Term Loan Facility with respect to the $150.0 million notional amount under each such Interest Rate Swap.
Under the terms of the 2007 Interest Rate Swap and the 2008 Interest Rate Swap, Products Corporation is
required to pay to the counterparty a quarterly fixed interest rate of 4.692% and 2.66%, respectively, on the
$150.0 million notional amount under each Interest Rate Swap commencing in December 2007 and July
2008, respectively, while receiving a variable interest rate payment from the counterparty equal to three-
month U.S. dollar LIBOR (which effectively fixed the interest rate on such notional amounts at 8.692% and
6.66%, respectively, for the 2-year term of each Interest Rate Swap). While the Company is exposed to
credit loss in the event of the counterparty’s non-performance, if any, the Company’s exposure is limited to
the net amount that Products Corporation would have received from the counterparty over the remaining
balance of each Interest Rate Swap’s two-year term. The Company does not anticipate any non-perfor-
mance and, furthermore, even in the case of any non-performance by the counterparty, the Company
expects that any such loss would not be material.

Products Corporation’s Interest Rate Swaps qualify for hedge accounting treatment under
SFAS No. 133 and have been designated as cash flow hedges. Accordingly, the effective portion of the
changes in fair value of the Interest Rate Swaps is reported within the equity component of the Company’s
other comprehensive loss. The ineffective portion of the changes in the fair value of the Interest Rate Swaps,
if any, is recognized in interest expense. Any unrecognized income (loss) accumulated in other compre-
hensive loss related to the Interest Rate Swaps is recorded in the Company’s Statement of Operations,
primarily in interest expense, when the underlying transactions hedged are realized.

At December 31, 2008, the fair value of Products Corporation’s 2007 Interest Rate Swap and 2008
Interest Rate Swap was $(3.8) million and $(1.9) million, respectively, and the accumulated losses recorded
in other comprehensive loss were $3.7 million and $1.7 million, respectively. During 2008, a derivative loss
of $2.0 million and a derivative gain of $0.1 million related to the 2007 Interest Rate Swap and 2008 Interest
Rate Swap, respectively, was reclassified from other comprehensive loss into the Company’s Statement of

F-15

Operations in interest expense. The amount of the 2008 Interest Rate Swap’s ineffectiveness in 2008, which
was recorded in interest expense, was $(0.2) million.

At December 31, 2007, the fair value of Products Corporation’s 2007 Interest Rate Swap was
$(2.2) million and the accumulated losses recorded in other comprehensive loss were $2.1 million. During
2007, a derivative gain of $0.4 million related to the 2007 Interest Rate Swap was reclassified from other
comprehensive loss into the Company’s Statement of Operations in interest expense. The amount of the
2008 Interest Rate Swap’s ineffectiveness in 2007, which was recorded in interest expense, was
$(0.2) million.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements:

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,“Fair Value Measurements”. This statement clarifies
the definition of fair value of assets and liabilities, establishes a framework for measuring fair value of assets
and liabilities and expands the disclosures on fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal
years beginning after November 15, 2007. However, the FASB deferred the effective date of SFAS No. 157
until the fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 as it relates to the fair value measurement
requirements for non-financial assets and liabilities that are initially measured at fair value, but not
measured at fair value in subsequent periods. These non-financial assets include goodwill and other
indefinite-lived intangible assets which are included within other assets. In accordance with SFAS No. 157,
the Company has adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 157 with respect to financial assets and liabilities
effective as of January 1, 2008 and its adoption did not have a material impact on its results of operations or
financial condition. The Company will adopt SFAS No. 157 for non-financial assets and liabilities effective
as of January 1, 2009 and does not expect that its adoption will have a material impact on the Company’s
results of operations and/or financial condition.

The fair value framework under SFAS No. 157 requires the categorization of assets and liabilities into
three levels based upon the assumptions used to price the assets or liabilities. Level 1 provides the most
reliable measure of fair value, whereas Level 3, if applicable, generally would require significant man-
agement judgment. The three levels for categorizing assets and liabilities under SFAS No. 157’s fair value
measurement requirements are as follows:

• Level 1: Fair valuing the asset or liability using observable inputs such as quoted prices in active

markets for identical assets or liabilities;

• Level 2: Fair valuing the asset or liability using inputs other than quoted prices that are observable
for the applicable asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar (as
opposed to identical) assets or liabilities in active markets and quoted prices for identical or similar
assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; and

• Level 3: Fair valuing the asset or liability using unobservable inputs that reflect the Company’s own

assumptions regarding the applicable asset or liability.

F-16

As of December 31, 2008 the fair values of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, namely its
foreign currency forward exchange contracts and Interest Rate Swaps, are categorized as presented in the
table below:

Total

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Assets
Interest Rate Swaps(a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts(b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$0.8
2.2

Total assets at fair value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$3.0

Liabilities
Interest Rate Swaps(a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts(b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$6.5
0.2

Total liabilities at fair value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$6.7

$—
—

$—

$—
—

$—

$0.8
2.2

$3.0

$6.5
0.2

$6.7

$—
—

$—

$—
—

$—

(a) Based on three-month U.S. Dollar LIBOR index.

(b) Based on observable market transactions of spot and forward rates.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R, “Business Combinations”. This statement
establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer of a business recognizes and measures in
its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any non-controlling interest
in the acquiree and goodwill acquired, and it provides guidance for disclosures about business combina-
tions. SFAS No. 141R requires all assets acquired, the liabilities assumed and any non-controlling interest in
the acquiree be recognized at their fair values at the acquisition date. SFAS No. 141R also requires the
acquirer to expense acquisition costs as incurred and to expense restructuring costs in the periods
subsequent to the acquisition date. In addition, SFAS No. 141R also requires the acquirer to recognize
changes in valuation allowances on acquired deferred tax assets in its statement of operations on financial
condition. These changes in deferred tax benefits were previously recognized through a corresponding
reduction to goodwill. With the exception of provisions regarding acquired deferred taxes, which are
applicable to all business combinations, SFAS No. 141R applies prospectively to business combinations for
which the acquisition date is on or after the fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company
will adopt the provisions of SFAS No. 141R effective as of January 1, 2009 and expects that its adoption will
not have a material impact on its results of operations or financial condition.

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities — An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133”. This statement is intended to improve
financial reporting of derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures about
(a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged
items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and its related interpretations and (c) how derivative
instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance and cash
flows. The provisions of SFAS No. 161 are effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. See
Note 10, “Financial Instruments — Derivative Financial Instruments” for the Company’s disclosures
required under SFAS No. 161. The Company has adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 161 as of December 31,
2008 and its adoption did not have a material impact on its results of operations or financial condition.

2. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

In July 2008, the Company consummated the disposition of its non-core Bozzano business, a men’s hair
care and shaving line of products, and certain other non-core brands, including Juvena and Aquamarine,
which were sold by the Company only in the Brazilian market (the “Bozzano Sale Transaction”). The
transaction was effected through the sale of the Company’s indirect Brazilian subsidiary, Ceil Comércio E
Distribuidora Ltda. (“Ceil”), to Hypermarcas S.A., a Brazilian publicly-traded, consumer products cor-
poration. The purchase price was approximately $107 million, including approximately $3 million in cash on

F-17

Ceil’s balance sheet on the closing date. Net proceeds, after the payment of taxes and transaction costs, were
approximately $95 million.

In September 2008, Products Corporation used $63 million of the net proceeds from the Bozzano Sale
Transaction to repay $63 million in aggregate principal amount of the MacAndrews & Forbes Senior
Subordinated Term Loan, which after such repayment had $107 million in aggregate principal amount
outstanding, and which pursuant to a November 2008 amendment is scheduled to mature on the earlier of
(1) the date that Revlon, Inc. issues equity with gross proceeds of at least $107 million, which proceeds
would be used to repay the $107 million remaining aggregate principal balance of the MacAndrews &
Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan, or (2) August 1, 2010.

During the third quarter of 2008, the Company recorded a one-time gain from the Bozzano Sale
Transaction of $45.2 million, net of taxes of $10.4 million. Included in this gain calculation is a $37.3 million
elimination of currency translation adjustments.

The consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, were updated to reflect
the assets and liabilities of the Ceil subsidiary as a discontinued operation. The following table summarizes
the assets and liabilities of the discontinued operation, excluding intercompany balances eliminated in
consolidation, at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively:

Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Trade receivables, less allowance for doubtful accounts of nil and $0.8 as of
September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Inventories. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prepaid expenses and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Property, plant and equipment, net. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Goodwill, net. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

December 31,
2008

December 31,
2007

$ —

$ 1.7

—
—
0.3
—
—
—

6.5
3.4
5.0
1.0
0.3
3.5

Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$0.3

$21.4

Liabilities:
Short-term borrowings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued expenses and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total current liabilities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other long-term liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ —
—
0.9

0.9

1.7

Total liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$2.6

$ 0.4
1.2
7.4

9.0

1.9

$10.9

The income statements for the year ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively, were
adjusted to reflect the Ceil subsidiary as a discontinued operation (which was previously reported in the

F-18

Latin America region). The following table summarizes the results of the Ceil discontinued operations for
each of the respective periods:

Year Ended December 31,
2008
2006
2007

Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Provision for income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net (loss) income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$20.6
0.1
0.1
0.5
(0.4)

$33.0
2.6
3.4
0.5
2.9

$32.7
1.7
0.8
—
0.8

3. RESTRUCTURING COSTS AND OTHER, NET

During 2008, the Company recorded income of $8.4 million to restructuring costs and other, net,
primarily due to a gain of $7.0 million related to the sale of a facility in Mexico and a net gain of $5.9 million
related to the sale of a non-core trademark. In addition, during 2008 the Company reduced by $0.4 million
restructuring costs that were associated with certain restructurings announced in 2006 (the “2006 Pro-
grams”), primarily due to the charges for employee severance and other employee-related termination
costs being slightly lower than originally estimated. These were partially offset by a charge of $4.9 million
for certain restructuring activities in 2008, of which $0.8 million related to a restructuring in Canada,
$1.1 million related to the Company’s decision to close and sell its facility in Mexico, $2.9 million related to
the Company’s realignment of certain functions within customer business development, information
management and administrative services in the U.S. and $0.1 million related other various restructurings
(together the “2008 Programs”).

During 2007, the Company recorded total restructuring charges of approximately $7.3 million, of which
$4.4 million was associated with the restructurings announced in 2006, primarily for employee severance and
other employee-related termination costs, as to which approximately 300 employees had been terminated in
connection with these restructurings. In addition, approximately $2.9 million was associated with restruc-
turing programs implemented in 2007, primarily for employee severance and other employee-related
termination costs relating principally to the closure of the Company’s facility in Irvington, New Jersey
and other employee-related termination costs relating to personnel reductions in the Company’s information
management function and its sales force in Canada (the “2007 Programs”), as to which approximately
140 employees had been terminated in connection with these restructurings. During 2006, the Company
recorded net charges of $27.4 million, primarily for employee severance and other related personnel benefits.

The 2006 Programs were designed to reduce ongoing costs and improve the Company’s operating
profit margins, and to streamline internal processes to enable the Company to continue to be more effective
and efficient in meeting the needs of its consumers and retail customers. The 2006 Programs consisted
largely of a broad organizational streamlining that involved consolidating responsibilities in certain related
functions and reducing layers of management to increase accountability and effectiveness; streamlining
support functions to reflect the new organization structure; eliminating certain senior executive positions;
and consolidating various facilities, as well as the consolidation of certain functions within the Company’s
sales, marketing and creative groups, and certain headquarters functions.

Details of the activity described above during 2008, 2007 and 2006 are as follows:

F-19

2008

Employee severance and other personnel

benefits:
2006 programs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2007 programs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2008 programs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Leases and equipment write-offs . . . . . . . . . . .
Total restructuring accrual . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Gain on sale of Mexico facility . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on sale of non-core trademark . . . . . . . . .
Total restructuring costs and other, net . . . . . .

2007

Employee severance and other personnel

benefits:
2003 programs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2004 programs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2006 Programs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other 2006 programs(a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2007 Programs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Leases and equipment write-offs . . . . . . . . . . .

2006

Employee severance and other personnel

benefits:
2003 programs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2004 programs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2006 Programs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other 2006 programs(a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Leases and equipment write-offs . . . . . . . . . . .

Balance
Beginning of
Year

Expenses,
Net

Utilized, Net

Cash

Noncash

Balance
End of Year

$ 4.1
0.6
—
4.7
0.2
$ 4.9

$ 0.1
0.1
17.2
0.1
—
17.5
0.4
$17.9

$ 1.2
2.4
—
—
3.6
0.6
$ 4.2

$ (0.4)
—
4.9
4.5
—

(7.0)
(5.9)
$ (8.4)

$ —
—
4.4
—
2.9
7.3
—
$ 7.3

$ (0.3)
—
27.6
0.3
27.6
(0.2)
$27.4

$ (3.4)
(0.5)
(1.7)
(5.6)
(0.2)
$ (5.8)

$ —
—
(0.2)
(0.2)
—
$(0.2)

$ 0.3
0.1
3.0
3.4
—
$ 3.4

$ (0.1)
(0.1)
(16.2)
(0.1)
(2.3)
(18.8)
—
$(18.8)

$ (0.8)
(2.3)
(10.4)
(0.2)
(13.7)
0.2
$(13.5)

$ —
—
(1.3)
—
—
(1.3)
(0.2)
$(1.5)

$ —
—
—
—
—
(0.2)
$(0.2)

$ —
—
4.1
—
0.6
4.7
0.2
$ 4.9

$ 0.1
0.1
17.2
0.1
17.5
0.4
$17.9

(a) Other 2006 programs refer to various immaterial international restructurings in respect of Chile, Brazil and Israel.

As of December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, the unpaid balance of the restructuring costs and other, net for
reserves is included in “Accrued expenses and other” and “Other long-term liabilities” in the Company’s
Consolidated Balance Sheets. The remaining balance at December 31, 2008 for employee severance and
other personnel benefits is $3.4 million, of which $3.4 million is expected to be paid by the end of 2009.

4.

INVENTORIES

Raw materials and supplies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Work-in-process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Finished goods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

F-20

December 31,

2008

2007

$ 57.6
16.6
80.0

$154.2

$ 58.6
17.4
89.7

$165.7

5. PREPAID EXPENSES AND OTHER

Prepaid expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET

December 31,

2008

$22.9
28.4
$51.3

2007

$25.7
21.9
$47.6

December 31,

2008

2007

Land and improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Building and improvements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Machinery, equipment and capital leases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Office furniture, fixtures and capitalized software . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Leasehold improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction-in-progress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

2.0
59.9
129.9
97.4
10.8
10.1

$

2.0
59.0
133.7
89.9
11.9
13.5

Accumulated depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

310.1
(197.3)

310.0
(197.3)

$ 112.8

$ 112.7

Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 was $17.8 million,

$19.8 million and $26.2 million, respectively.

7. ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER

Sales returns and allowances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Advertising and promotional costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Compensation and related benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Restructuring costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Derivative financial instruments. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

December 31,

2008

2007

$ 87.3
30.9
41.4
14.7
15.9
3.4
5.7
25.7

$225.0

$ 98.8
36.6
40.6
18.9
13.0
4.6
1.3
29.2

$243.0

8. SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS

Products Corporation had outstanding short-term bank borrowings (excluding borrowings under the
2006 Credit Agreements, which are reflected in Note 9, “Long-Term Debt”), aggregating $0.5 million and
$1.7 million at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The weighted average interest rate on short-term
borrowings outstanding at December 31, 2008 and 2007 was 8.0% and 6.8%, respectively. Under certain of
these short-term borrowing arrangements, the Company is permitted to borrow against its cash balances.
The cash balances and related borrowings are shown gross in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.
As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company had no such borrowing arrangements against its cash
balances.

F-21

9. LONG-TERM DEBT

2006 Term Loan Facility due 2012 (See (a) below) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2006 Revolving Credit Facility due 2012 (See (a) below) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
91⁄2% Senior Notes due 2011, net of discounts (See (b) below) . . . . . . . . . . . .
85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2008 (See (c) below). . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan due 2010

(See (d) below) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit (See (e) below) . .
Other long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Less current portion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

December 31,

2008

2007

$ 833.7
—
388.2
—

107.0
—
0.2

$ 840.0
43.5
387.5
167.4

—
—
0.5

1,329.1
(18.9)

1,438.9
(6.5)

$1,310.2

$1,432.4

The Company completed several significant financing transactions during 2008, 2007 and 2006.

2008 Transactions

Full Repayment of the 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes with the MacAndrews & Forbes Senior
Subordinated Term Loan

In January 2008, Products Corporation entered into the Senior Subordinated Term Loan Agreement
with MacAndrews & Forbes (the “MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan”) and on
February 1, 2008, Products Corporation used the $170 million proceeds of such loan to repay in full the
approximately $167.4 million remaining aggregate principal amount of Products Corporation’s 85⁄8% Senior
Subordinated Notes due February 1, 2008 (the “85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes”), which matured on
February 1, 2008, and to pay $2.55 million of related fees and expenses. In connection with such repayment,
Products Corporation also paid from cash on hand approximately $7.2 million of accrued and unpaid
interest due on the 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes up to, but not including, the February 1, 2008 maturity
date.

In September 2008, Products Corporation used $63.0 million of the net proceeds from the Bozzano
Sale Transaction to partially repay $63.0 million in aggregate principal amount of the MacAndrews &
Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan. Following such partial repayment, there remained outstanding
$107 million in aggregate principal amount under the MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term
Loan.

Pursuant to a November 2008 amendment, the MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term
Loan is scheduled to mature on the earlier of (1) the date that Revlon, Inc. issues equity with gross proceeds
of at least $107 million, which proceeds would be contributed to Products Corporation and used to repay
the $107 million remaining aggregate principal balance of the MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated
Term Loan, or (2) August 1, 2010.

Under the MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan, Products Corporation may, at its
option, prepay such loan, in whole or in part, at any time prior to maturity, without premium or penalty. The
MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan bears interest at an annual rate of 11%, payable
quarterly in cash, and is unsecured and subordinated to Products Corporation’s senior debt.

F-22

2007 Transactions

$100 Million Rights Offering — 2007

In January 2007, Revlon, Inc. successfully completed the $100 Million Rights Offering (as hereinafter
defined) of its Class A Common Stock and used the proceeds primarily to reduce Products Corporation’s
indebtedness. See “2004 Investment Agreement — $100 Million Rights Offering”, below.

2006 Transactions

Credit Agreement Refinancing — December 2006

In December 2006, Products Corporation completed a refinancing of its 2004 Credit Agreement (as
hereinafter defined) by entering into the 5-year 2006 Term Loan Facility (as hereinafter defined) in an
original aggregate principal amount of $840 million, and entering into the 2006 Revolving Credit Facility,
amending and restating its existing $160.0 million multi-currency revolving credit facility under the 2004
Credit Agreement and extending its maturity through the same 5-year period, maturing on January 15,
2012.

$110 Million Rights Offering — March 2006

In March 2006, Revlon, Inc. completed the $110 Million Rights Offering (as hereinafter defined) of its
Class A Common Stock and used the proceeds to reduce Products Corporation’s indebtedness. See “2004
Investment Agreement — $110 Million Rights Offering”, below.

(a) Credit Agreements:

Complete Refinancing of the 2004 Credit Agreement in December 2006

In July 2004, Products Corporation entered into a credit agreement (the “2004 Credit Agreement”)
with certain of its subsidiaries as local borrowing subsidiaries, a syndicate of lenders, Citicorp USA, Inc., as
multi-currency administrative agent, term loan administrative agent and collateral agent, UBS Securities
LLC as syndication agent and Citigroup Global Markets Inc., as sole lead arranger and sole bookrunner.

The 2004 Credit Agreement originally provided up to $960.0 million and consisted of a term loan
facility of $800.0 million (the “2004 Term Loan Facility”) and a $160.0 million multi-currency revolving
credit facility, the availability under which varied based upon the borrowing base that was determined based
upon the value of eligible accounts receivable and eligible inventory in the U.S. and the U.K. and eligible
real property and equipment in the U.S. from time to time (the “2004 Multi-Currency Facility”). In March
2005, Products Corporation pre-paid $100.0 million of the 2004 Term Loan Facility using a portion of the
net proceeds of Products Corporation’s 91⁄2% Senior Notes (as hereinafter defined), and in July 2006, the
2004 Term Loan Facility was increased back to $800.0 million as a result of the $100.0 million Term Loan
Add-on (as hereinafter defined).

On December 20, 2006, Products Corporation replaced the $800 million 2004 Term Loan Facility
under its 2004 Credit Agreement with a 5-year, $840 million term loan facility (the “2006 Term Loan
Facility”) by entering into a term loan agreement (the “2006 Term Loan Agreement”), dated as of
December 20, 2006, among Products Corporation, as borrower, the lenders party thereto, Citicorp USA,
Inc., as administrative agent and collateral agent, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., as sole lead arranger and
sole bookrunner, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as syndication agent. As part of this bank refinancing,
Products Corporation also amended and restated the 2004 Multi-Currency Facility (the “2006 Revolving
Credit Facility” and together with the 2006 Term Loan Facility the “2006 Credit Facilities”) by entering into
a $160.0 million asset-based, multi-currency revolving credit agreement that amended and restated the 2004
Credit Agreement (the “2006 Revolving Credit Agreement” and together with the 2006 Term Loan
Agreement, the “2006 Credit Agreements”).

F-23

Among other things, the 2006 Credit Facilities extended the maturity dates for Products Corporation’s
bank credit facilities from July 9, 2009 to January 15, 2012 in the case of the 2006 Revolving Credit Facility
and from July 9, 2010 to January 15, 2012 in the case of the 2006 Term Loan Facility.

Availability under the 2006 Revolving Credit Facility varies based on a borrowing base that is
determined by the value of eligible accounts receivable and eligible inventory in the U.S. and the U.K.
and eligible real property and equipment in the U.S. from time to time.

In each case subject to borrowing base availability, the 2006 Revolving Credit Facility is available to:

(i)

Products Corporation in revolving credit loans denominated in U.S. dollars;

(ii) Products Corporation in swing line loans denominated in U.S. dollars up to $30 million;

(iii) Products Corporation in standby and commercial letters of credit denominated in U.S. dollars

and other currencies up to $60 million; and

(iv) Products Corporation and certain of its international subsidiaries designated from time to time in
revolving credit loans and bankers’ acceptances denominated in U.S. dollars and other
currencies.

If the value of the eligible assets is not sufficient to support a $160 million borrowing base under the
2006 Revolving Credit Facility, Products Corporation will not have full access to the 2006 Revolving Credit
Facility. Products Corporation’s ability to make borrowings under the 2006 Revolving Credit Facility is also
conditioned upon the satisfaction of certain conditions precedent and Products Corporation’s compliance
with other covenants in the 2006 Revolving Credit Facility, including a fixed charge coverage ratio that
applies if and when the “excess borrowing base” (representing the difference between (1) the borrowing
base under the 2006 Revolving Credit Facility and (2) the amounts outstanding under such facility) is less
than $20.0 million.

Borrowings under the 2006 Revolving Credit Facility (other than loans in foreign currencies) bear
interest at a rate equal to, at Products Corporation’s option, either (i) the Eurodollar Rate plus 2.00% per
annum or (ii) the Alternate Base Rate plus 1.00% per annum. Loans in foreign currencies bear interest in
certain limited circumstances, or if mutually acceptable to Products Corporation and the relevant foreign
lenders, at the Local Rate, and otherwise at the Eurocurrency Rate, in each case plus 2.00%. At
December 31, 2008, the effective weighted average interest rate for borrowings under the 2006 Revolving
Credit Facility was 6.42%.

Products Corporation pays to the lenders under the 2006 Revolving Credit Facility a commitment fee
of 0.30% of the average daily unused portion of the 2006 Revolving Credit Facility, which fee is payable
quarterly in arrears. Under the 2006 Revolving Credit Facility, Products Corporation pays:

(i)

(ii)

(iii)

to foreign lenders a fronting fee of 0.25% per annum on the aggregate principal amount of
specified Local Loans (which fee is retained by foreign lenders out of the portion of the
Applicable Margin payable to such foreign lender);

to foreign lenders an administrative fee of 0.25% per annum on the aggregate principal amount
of specified Local Loans;

to the multi-currency lenders a letter of credit commission equal to the product of (a) the
Applicable Margin for revolving credit loans that are Eurodollar Rate loans (adjusted for the
term that the letter of credit is outstanding) and (b) the aggregate undrawn face amount of letters
of credit; and

(iv)

to the issuing lender, a letter of credit fronting fee of 0.25% per annum of the aggregate undrawn
face amount of letters of credit, which fee is a portion of the Applicable Margin.

Under the 2006 Term Loan Facility, Eurodollar Loans bear interest at the Eurodollar Rate plus 4.00%
per annum and Alternate Base Rate loans bear interest at the Alternate Base Rate plus 3.00% per annum.

F-24

At December 31, 2008, the effective weighted average interest rate for borrowings under the 2006 Term
Loan Facility was 6.42%.

The original aggregate principal amount under the 2006 Term Loan Facility was $840 million, which
was drawn in full on the December 20, 2006 closing date and used to repay in full the approximately
$798 million of outstanding term loans under the 2004 Credit Agreement (plus accrued interest of
approximately $15.3 million and a pre-payment fee of approximately $8.0 million), and the remainder
was used to repay approximately $13.3 million of indebtedness outstanding under the 2006 Revolving
Credit Facility, after paying fees and expenses related to the credit agreement refinancing.

Prior to the termination date of the 2006 Term Loan Facility, on April 15, July 15, October 15 and
January 15 of each year (which commenced April 15, 2008), Products Corporation is required to repay
$2.1 million of the principal amount of the term loans outstanding under the 2006 Term Loan Facility on
each respective date. In addition, the term loans under the 2006 Term Loan Facility are required to be
prepaid with:

(i)

the net proceeds in excess of $10.0 million for each twelve-month period ending on each July 9
(or $25.0 million for the twelve-month period ending on July 9, 2007) received during such period
from sales of Term Loan First Lien Collateral (as defined below) by Products Corporation or any
of its subsidiary guarantors (subject to carryover of unused annual basket amounts up to a
maximum of $25.0 million and subject to certain specified dispositions up to an additional
$25.0 million in the aggregate);

(ii)

the net proceeds from the issuance by Products Corporation or any of its subsidiaries of certain
additional debt; and

(iii) 50% of Products Corporation’s “Excess Cash Flow” (as defined under the 2006 Term Loan
Facility), which prepayments are applied to reduce future regularly scheduled amortization
payments.

At December 31, 2008 the aggregate principal amount outstanding under the 2006 Term Loan Facility

was $833.7 million due to the regularly scheduled quarterly amortization payments referred to above.

Under the 2006 Term Loan Facility, certain pre-payments require the payment of fees of 1% if such

pre-payment is made on or prior to December 20, 2009, in each case of the amount prepaid.

Under certain circumstances, Products Corporation will have the right to request the 2006 Revolving
Credit Facility to be increased by up to $50.0 million and the 2006 Term Loan Facility to be increased by up
to $200.0 million, provided that the lenders are not committed to provide any such increase.

The 2006 Credit Facilities are supported by, among other things, guarantees from Revlon, Inc. and,
subject to certain limited exceptions, the domestic subsidiaries of Products Corporation. The obligations of
Products Corporation under the 2006 Credit Facilities and the obligations under the guarantees are secured
by, subject to certain limited exceptions, substantially all of the assets of Products Corporation and the
subsidiary guarantors, including:

(i) mortgages on owned real property, including Products Corporation’s facility in Oxford, North

Carolina and property in Irvington, New Jersey;

(ii)

(iii)

(iv)

the capital stock of Products Corporation and the subsidiary guarantors and 66% of the capital
stock of Products Corporation’s and the subsidiary guarantors’ first-tier foreign subsidiaries;

intellectual property and other intangible property of Products Corporation and the subsidiary
guarantors; and

inventory, accounts receivable, equipment, investment property and deposit accounts of Prod-
ucts Corporation and the subsidiary guarantors.

The liens on, among other things, inventory, accounts receivable, deposit accounts, investment prop-
erty (other than the capital stock of Products Corporation and its subsidiaries), real property, equipment,

F-25

fixtures and certain intangible property related thereto secure the 2006 Revolving Credit Facility on a first
priority basis and the 2006 Term Loan Facility on a second priority basis. The liens on the capital stock of
Products Corporation and its subsidiaries and intellectual property and certain other intangible property
(the “Term Loan First Lien Collateral”) secure the 2006 Term Loan Facility on a first priority basis and the
2006 Revolving Credit Facility on a second priority basis. Such arrangements are set forth in the Amended
and Restated Intercreditor and Collateral Agency Agreement, dated as of December 20, 2006, by and
among Products Corporation and the lenders (the “2006 Intercreditor Agreement”). The 2006 Intercre-
ditor Agreement also provides that the liens referred to above may be shared from time to time, subject to
certain limitations, with specified types of other obligations incurred or guaranteed by Products Corpo-
ration, such as foreign exchange and interest rate hedging obligations (including the Interest Rate Swaps
that Products Corporation entered into in September 2007 and April 2008 in connection with indebtedness
outstanding under the 2006 Term Loan Facility) and foreign working capital lines.

Each of the 2006 Credit Facilities contains various restrictive covenants prohibiting Products Corpo-

ration and its subsidiaries from:

(i)

incurring additional indebtedness or guarantees, with certain exceptions;

(ii) making dividend and other payments or loans to Revlon, Inc. or other affiliates, with certain

exceptions, including among others,

(a)

(b)

(c)

exceptions permitting Products Corporation to pay dividends or make other payments to
Revlon, Inc. to enable it to, among other things, pay expenses incidental to being a public
holding company, including, among other things, professional fees such as legal, accounting
and insurance fees, regulatory fees, such as SEC filing fees and NYSE listing fees, and other
expenses related to being a public holding company,

subject to certain circumstances, to finance the purchase by Revlon, Inc. of its Class A
Common Stock in connection with the delivery of such Class A Common Stock to grantees
under the Stock Plan and/or the payment of withholding taxes in connection with the
vesting of restricted stock awards under such plan, and

subject to certain limitations, to pay dividends or make other payments to finance the
purchase, redemption or other retirement for value by Revlon, Inc. of stock or other equity
interests or equivalents in Revlon, Inc. held by any current or former director, employee or
consultant in his or her capacity as such;

(iii) creating liens or other encumbrances on Products Corporation’s or its subsidiaries’ assets or
revenues, granting negative pledges or selling or transferring any of Products Corporation’s or its
subsidiaries’ assets, all subject to certain limited exceptions;

(iv) with certain exceptions, engaging in merger or acquisition transactions;

(v)

prepaying indebtedness and modifying the terms of certain indebtedness and specified material
contractual obligations, subject to certain exceptions;

(vi) making investments, subject to certain exceptions; and

(vii) entering into transactions with affiliates of Products Corporation other than upon terms no less
favorable to Products Corporation or its subsidiaries than it would obtain in an arms’ length
transaction.

In addition to the foregoing, the 2006 Term Loan Facility contains a financial covenant limiting
Products Corporation’s senior secured leverage ratio (the ratio of Products Corporation’s Senior Secured
Debt (excluding debt outstanding under the 2006 Revolving Credit Facility) to EBITDA, as each such term
is defined in the 2006 Term Loan Facility) to 5.0 to 1.0 for each period of four consecutive fiscal quarters
ending during the period from December 31, 2008 to the January 2012 maturity date of the 2006 Term Loan
Facility.

F-26

Under certain circumstances if and when the difference between (i) the borrowing base under the 2006
Revolving Credit Facility and (ii) the amounts outstanding under the 2006 Revolving Credit Facility is less
than $20.0 million for a period of 30 consecutive days or more, the 2006 Revolving Credit Facility requires
Products Corporation to maintain a consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio (the ratio of EBITDA minus
Capital Expenditures to Cash Interest Expense for such period, as each such term is defined in the 2006
Revolving Credit Facility) of 1.0 to 1.0.

The events of default under each 2006 Credit Facility include customary events of default for such

types of agreements, including:

(i)

(ii)

(iii)

nonpayment of any principal, interest or other fees when due, subject in the case of interest and
fees to a grace period;

non-compliance with the covenants in such 2006 Credit Facility or the ancillary security doc-
uments, subject in certain instances to grace periods;

the institution of any bankruptcy, insolvency or similar proceedings by or against Products
Corporation, any of Products Corporation’s subsidiaries or Revlon, Inc., subject in certain
instances to grace periods;

(iv) default by Revlon, Inc. or any of its subsidiaries (A) in the payment of certain indebtedness when
due (whether at maturity or by acceleration) in excess of $5.0 million in aggregate principal
amount or (B) in the observance or performance of any other agreement or condition relating to
such debt, provided that the amount of debt involved is in excess of $5.0 million in aggregate
principal amount, or the occurrence of any other event, the effect of which default referred to in
this subclause (iv) is to cause or permit the holders of such debt to cause the acceleration of
payment of such debt;

(v)

in the case of the 2006 Term Loan Facility, a cross default under the 2006 Revolving Credit
Facility, and in the case of the 2006 Revolving Credit Facility, a cross default under the 2006 Term
Loan Facility;

(vi)

the failure by Products Corporation, certain of Products Corporation’s subsidiaries or Revlon,
Inc. to pay certain material judgments;

(vii) a change of control such that (A) Revlon, Inc. shall cease to be the beneficial and record owner of
100% of Products Corporation’s capital stock, (B) Ronald O. Perelman (or his estate, heirs,
executors, administrator or other personal representative) and his or their controlled affiliates
shall cease to “control” Products Corporation, and any other person or group or persons owns,
directly or indirectly, more than 35% of the total voting power of Products Corporation, (C) any
person or group of persons other than Ronald O. Perelman (or his estate, heirs, executors,
administrator or other personal representative) and his or their controlled affiliates shall
“control” Products Corporation or (D) during any period of two consecutive years, the directors
serving on Products Corporation’s Board of Directors at the beginning of such period (or other
directors nominated by at least 662⁄3% of such continuing directors) shall cease to be a majority of
the directors;

(viii) the failure by Revlon, Inc. to contribute to Products Corporation all of the net proceeds it
receives from any sale of its equity securities or Products Corporation’s capital stock, subject to
certain limited exceptions;

(ix)

the failure of any of Products Corporation’s, its subsidiaries’ or Revlon, Inc.’s representations or
warranties in any of the documents entered into in connection with the 2006 Credit Facility to be
correct, true and not misleading in all material respects when made or confirmed;

(x)

the conduct by Revlon, Inc. of any meaningful business activities other than those that are
customary for a publicly traded holding company which is not itself an operating company,

F-27

including the ownership of meaningful assets (other than Products Corporation’s capital stock)
or the incurrence of debt, in each case subject to limited exceptions;

(xi) any M&F Lenders’ failure to fund any binding commitments by such M&F Lender under any
agreement governing certain loans from the M&F Lenders (excluding the MacAndrews &
Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan which was fully funded by MacAndrews & Forbes in
February 2008); and

(xii) the failure of certain of Products Corporation’s affiliates which hold Products Corporation’s or its
subsidiaries’ indebtedness to be party to a valid and enforceable agreement prohibiting such
affiliate from demanding or retaining payments in respect of such indebtedness.

If Products Corporation is in default under the senior secured leverage ratio under the 2006 Term Loan
Facility or the consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio under the 2006 Revolving Credit Facility, Products
Corporation may cure such default by issuing certain equity securities to, or receiving capital contributions
from, Revlon, Inc. and applying the cash therefrom which is deemed to increase EBITDA for the purpose of
calculating the applicable ratio. This cure right may be exercised by Products Corporation two times in any
four quarter period.

Products Corporation was in compliance with all applicable covenants under the 2006 Credit Agree-
ments as of December 31, 2008. At December 31, 2008, the aggregate principal amount outstanding under
the 2006 Term Loan Facility was $833.7 million due to regularly scheduled quarterly amortization
payments. At December 31, 2008, availability under the $160.0 million 2006 Revolving Credit Facility,
based upon the calculated borrowing base less approximately $13.1 million of outstanding letters of credit
and nil then drawn on the 2006 Revolving Credit Facility, was approximately $126.8 million.

Other Transactions under the 2004 Credit Agreement Prior to Its Complete Refinancing in
December 2006

In March 2005, the 2004 Term Loan Facility was reduced to $700.0 million following Products
Corporation’s March 2005 pre-payment of $100.0 million with a portion of the proceeds from its issuance
of the 91⁄2% Senior Notes and in July 2006, the Term Loan Facility was increased back to $800.0 million as a
result of the $100.0 million Term Loan Add-on.

In February 2006, Products Corporation secured an amendment to the 2004 Credit Agreement (the
“first amendment”), which excluded from various financial covenants certain charges in connection with
the 2006 Programs described in Note 3 above, as well as some start-up costs incurred by the Company in
2005 related to the Vital Radiance brand before its discontinuance in September 2006 and the complete re-
stage of the Almay brand. Specifically, the first amendment provided for the add-back to the 2004 Credit
Agreement’s definition of “EBITDA” the lesser of (i) $50 million; or (ii) the cumulative one-time charges
associated with (a) certain aspects of the 2006 Programs described in Note 3 and (b) the non-recurring costs
in the third and fourth quarters of 2005 associated with the Vital Radiance brand before its discontinuance
in September 2006 and the complete re-stage of the Almay brand. Under the 2004 Credit Agreement,
“EBITDA” was used in the determination of Products Corporation’s senior secured leverage ratio and the
consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio.

In July 2006, Products Corporation secured a further amendment (the “second amendment”) to its
2004 Credit Agreement to, among other things, add an additional $100.0 million to the 2004 Credit
Agreement’s 2004 Term Loan Facility (the “Term Loan Add-on”). The second amendment also reset the
2004 Credit Agreement’s senior secured leverage ratio covenant to 5.5 to 1.0 through June 30, 2007 (which
was subsequently extended to September 30, 2008 in connection with the December 2006 refinancing of the
2006 Credit Agreements), stepping down to 5.0 to 1.0 for the remainder of the term of the 2004 Credit
Agreement. The second amendment also enabled Products Corporation to add back to the 2004 Credit
Agreement’s definition of “EBITDA” up to $25 million related to restructuring charges (in addition to the
restructuring charges permitted to be added back pursuant to the first amendment to the 2004 Credit
Agreement) and charges for certain product returns and/or product discontinuances. The proceeds from the

F-28

$100.0 million Term Loan Add-on were used to repay in July 2006 $78.6 million of outstanding indebtedness
under the 2004 Multi-Currency Facility under the 2004 Credit Agreement, without any permanent
reduction in the commitment under that facility, and the balance of $11.7 million, after the payment of
fees and expenses incurred in connection with consummating such transaction, was used for general
corporate purposes.

In September 2006, Products Corporation secured an additional amendment (the “third amendment”)
to its 2004 Credit Agreement, which enabled Products Corporation to add back to the 2004 Credit
Agreement’s definition of “EBITDA” up to $75 million of restructuring charges (in addition to the
restructuring charges permitted to be added back pursuant to the first and second amendments to the 2004
Credit Agreement), asset impairment charges, inventory write-offs, inventory returns costs and in each case
related charges in connection with the September 2006 discontinuance of the Vital Radiance brand, the
Company’s CEO change in September 2006 and certain other aspects of the 2006 Programs described in
Note 3.

(b) 91⁄2% Senior Notes due 2011:

Products Corporation issued $310.0 million aggregate principal amount of 91⁄2% Senior Notes due 2011
(the “Original 91⁄2% Senior Notes”) pursuant to an indenture, dated as of March 16, 2005, by and between
Products Corporation and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee. This issuance and the related
transactions extended the maturities of Products Corporation’s debt that would have otherwise been due in
2006.

The proceeds from the Original 91⁄2% Senior Notes were used in March 2005 to prepay $100.0 million
of indebtedness outstanding under the 2004 Term Loan Facility of Products Corporation’s 2004 Credit
Agreement, together with accrued interest and the associated $5.0 million pre-payment fee and to pay
$7.0 million in certain fees and expenses associated with the issuance of the Original 91⁄2% Senior Notes.

The remaining $197.9 million of proceeds from the Original 91⁄2% Senior Notes was placed in a debt
defeasance trust and, in April 2005, used to redeem all of the $116.2 million aggregate principal amount of
Products Corporation’s then outstanding 81⁄8% Senior Notes, plus $1.9 million of accrued interest, and all of
the $75.5 million aggregate principal amount of Products Corporation’s then outstanding 9% Senior Notes,
plus $3.1 million of accrued interest and the applicable premium of $1.1 million. The aggregate redemption
amounts for the 81⁄8% Senior Notes and 9% Senior Notes were $118.1 million and $79.8 million, respec-
tively, which constituted the principal amount and interest payable on the 81⁄8% Senior Notes and the
9% Senior Notes up to, but not including, the redemption date, and, with respect to the 9% Senior Notes,
the applicable premium. In connection with the redemption, the Company recognized a loss on extin-
guishment of debt of $1.5 million.

In June 2005, all of the Original 91⁄2% Senior Notes were exchanged for new 91⁄2% Senior Notes (the
“March 2005 91⁄2% Senior Notes”), which have substantially identical terms to the Original 91⁄2% Senior
Notes, except that the March 2005 91⁄2% Senior Notes are registered with the SEC under the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and the transfer restrictions and registration rights applicable to
the Original 91⁄2% Senior Notes do not apply to the March 2005 91⁄2% Senior Notes.

In August 2005, Products Corporation issued an additional $80.0 million aggregate principal amount of
the 91⁄2% Senior Notes due 2011, which priced at 951⁄4% of par (the “Additional 91⁄2% Senior Notes”), in a
private placement to institutional buyers, as additional notes pursuant to the same indenture governing the
Original 91⁄2% Senior Notes. The issuance of the Additional 91⁄2% Senior Notes constituted a further
issuance of, are the same series as, and will vote on any matters submitted to note holders with, the Original
91⁄2% Senior Notes. The Company used the proceeds of this issuance to help fund investments in certain
brand initiatives and for general corporate purposes, as well as to pay fees and expenses in connection with
the issuance of the Additional 91⁄2% Senior Notes and any outstanding fees and expenses in connection with
the issuance of and exchange offer for the Original 91⁄2% Senior Notes.

F-29

In December 2005, all of the Additional 91⁄2% Senior Notes issued by Products Corporation in August
2005 were exchanged for new 91⁄2% Senior Notes (the “August 2005 91⁄2% Senior Notes”), which have
substantially identical terms to the Additional 91⁄2% Senior Notes, except that the August 2005 91⁄2% Senior
Notes are registered with the SEC under the Securities Act, and the transfer restrictions and registration
rights applicable to the Additional 91⁄2% Senior Notes do not apply to the August 2005 91⁄2% Senior Notes
(which are collectively referred to with the March 2005 91⁄2% Senior Notes as the “91⁄2% Senior Notes”).

The 91⁄2% Senior Notes are senior unsecured obligations of Products Corporation ranking equally in
right of payment with any of Products Corporation’s present and future senior indebtedness, including the
indebtedness under the 2006 Credit Agreements, and are senior to the MacAndrews & Forbes Senior
Subordinated Term Loan and, prior to their full repayment on February 1, 2008, the 85⁄8% Senior
Subordinated Notes. The 91⁄2% Senior Notes are also senior to all of Products Corporation’s future
subordinated indebtedness. The 91⁄2% Senior Notes are effectively subordinated to the outstanding
indebtedness and other liabilities of Products Corporation’s subsidiaries. The 91⁄2% Senior Notes bear
interest at an annual rate of 91⁄2%, which is payable on April 1 and October 1 of each year.

The 91⁄2% Senior Notes indenture provides that Products Corporation may redeem the 91⁄2% Senior
Notes at its option, in whole or in part, at any time on or after April 1, 2008, at the redemption prices set
forth in the 91⁄2% Senior Notes indenture.

Pursuant to the 91⁄2% Senior Notes indenture, upon a Change of Control (as defined in such indenture),
each holder of the 91⁄2% Senior Notes has the right to require Products Corporation to make an offer to
repurchase all or a portion of such holder’s 91⁄2% Senior Notes at a price equal to 101% of the aggregate
principal amount of such holder’s 91⁄2% Senior Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, thereon to the
date of repurchase.

The 91⁄2% Senior Notes indenture contains covenants which, subject to certain exceptions, limit the
ability of Products Corporation and its subsidiaries to, among other things, incur additional indebtedness,
pay dividends on or redeem or repurchase stock, engage in certain asset sales, make certain types of
investments and other restricted payments, engage in transactions with affiliates, restrict dividends or
payments from subsidiaries and create liens on their assets. All of these limitations and prohibitions,
however, are subject to a number of important qualifications and exceptions.

The 91⁄2% Senior Notes indenture contains customary events of default for debt instruments of such
type and includes a cross acceleration provision which provides that it shall be an event of default if any debt
(as defined in such indenture) of Products Corporation or any of its significant subsidiaries (as defined in
such indenture) is not paid within any applicable grace period after final maturity or is accelerated by the
holders of such debt because of a default and the total principal amount of the portion of such debt that is
unpaid or accelerated exceeds $25.0 million and such default continues for 10 days after notice from the
trustee under such indenture. If any such event of default occurs, the trustee under such indenture or the
holders of at least 25% in aggregate principal amount of the outstanding notes under such indenture may
declare all such notes to be due and payable immediately, provided that the holders of a majority in
aggregate principal amount of the outstanding notes under such indenture may, by notice to the trustee,
waive any such default or event of default and its consequences under such indenture.

(c) The 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes (the “85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes”):

Prior to their full repayment in February 2008 using the proceeds of the MacAndrews & Forbes Senior
Subordinated Term Loan, the 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes were unsecured obligations of Products
Corporation and (i) subordinate in right of payment to all existing and future senior debt of Products
Corporation, including the 91⁄2% Senior Notes and the indebtedness under the 2006 Credit Agreements,
(ii) ranked equally in right of payment with all future senior subordinated debt, if any, of Products
Corporation and (iii) senior in right of payment to all future junior subordinated debt, if any, of Products
Corporation. The 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes were effectively subordinated to the outstanding
indebtedness and other liabilities of Products Corporation’s subsidiaries. (See “MacAndrews & Forbes

F-30

Senior Subordinated Term Loan Agreement” and “2004 Investment Agreement — $110 Million Rights
Offering” and “— $100 Million Rights Offering” ).

(d) MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan Agreement

In January 2008, Products Corporation entered into the MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated
Term Loan Agreement and on February 1, 2008 used the $170 million of proceeds from such loan to repay in
full the $167.4 million remaining aggregate principal amount of Products Corporation’s 85⁄8% Senior
Subordinated Notes, which matured on February 1, 2008, and to pay $2.55 million of related fees and
expenses. In connection with such repayment, Products Corporation also used cash on hand to pay
$7.2 million of accrued and unpaid interest due on the 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes up to, but not
including, the February 1, 2008 maturity date.

In September 2008, Products Corporation used $63.0 million of the net proceeds from the Bozzano
Sale Transaction to partially repay $63.0 million of the outstanding aggregate principal amount of the
MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan. Following such partial repayment, there remained
outstanding $107 million in aggregate principal amount under the MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subor-
dinated Term Loan.

The MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan bears interest at an annual rate of 11%,
which is payable in arrears in cash on March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31 of each year.
Pursuant to a November 2008 amendment, the MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan is
scheduled to mature on the earlier of (1) the date that Revlon, Inc. issues equity with gross proceeds of at least
$107 million, which proceeds would be contributed to Products Corporation and used to repay the $107 mil-
lion remaining aggregate principal balance of the MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan, or
(2) August 1, 2010, in consideration for the payment of an extension fee of 1.5% of the aggregate principal
amount outstanding under the loan. The MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan continues
to provide that Products Corporation may, at its option, prepay such loan, in whole or in part (together with
accrued and unpaid interest), at any time prior to maturity without premium or penalty.

The MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan is an unsecured obligation of Products
Corporation and, pursuant to subordination provisions that are generally incorporated from the indenture
which governed the 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes prior to their repayment, is subordinated in right of
payment to all existing and future senior debt of Products Corporation, currently including indebtedness
under (i) Products Corporation’s 2006 Credit Agreements, and (ii) Products Corporation’s 91⁄2% Senior
Notes. The MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan has the right to payment equal in right
of payment with any present and future senior subordinated indebtedness of Products Corporation.

The MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan Agreement contains covenants (other
than the subordination provisions discussed above) that are generally incorporated from the indenture
governing Products Corporation’s 91⁄2% Senior Notes, including covenants that limit the ability of Products
Corporation and its subsidiaries to, among other things, incur additional indebtedness, pay dividends on or
redeem or repurchase stock, engage in certain asset sales, make certain types of investments and other
restricted payments, engage in certain transactions with affiliates, restrict dividends or payments from
subsidiaries and create liens on their assets. All of these limitations and prohibitions, however, are subject to
a number of important qualifications and exceptions.

The MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan Agreement includes a cross acceleration
provision which is substantially the same as that in Products Corporation’s 91⁄2% Senior Notes that provides
that it shall be an event of default under the MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan
Agreement if any debt (as defined in such agreement) of Products Corporation or any of its significant
subsidiaries (as defined in such agreement) is not paid within any applicable grace period after final maturity
or is accelerated by the holders of such debt because of a default and the total principal amount of the portion
of such debt that is unpaid or accelerated exceeds $25.0 million and such default continues for 10 days after
notice from MacAndrews & Forbes. If any such event of default occurs, MacAndrews & Forbes may declare
the MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan to be due and payable immediately.

F-31

The MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan Agreement also contains other custom-
ary events of default for loan agreements of such type, including, subject to applicable grace periods,
nonpayment of any principal or interest when due under the MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated
Term Loan Agreement, non-compliance with any of the material covenants in the MacAndrews & Forbes
Senior Subordinated Term Loan Agreement, any representation or warranty being incorrect, false or
misleading in any material respect, or the occurrence of certain bankruptcy, insolvency or similar pro-
ceedings by or against Products Corporation or any of its significant subsidiaries.

Upon any change of control (as defined in the MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan
Agreement), Products Corporation is required to repay the MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated
Term Loan in full, after fulfilling an offer to repay Products Corporation’s 91⁄2% Senior Notes and to the
extent permitted by Products Corporation’s 2006 Credit Agreements.

In connection with the closing of the MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan, Revlon,
Inc. and MacAndrews & Forbes entered into a letter agreement in January 2008 pursuant to which Revlon,
Inc. agreed that if Revlon, Inc. conducts any equity offering before the full payment of the MacAndrews &
Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan, and if MacAndrews & Forbes and/or its affiliates elects to
participate in any such offering, MacAndrews & Forbes and/or its affiliates may pay for any shares it
acquires in such offering either in cash or by tendering debt valued at its face amount under the
MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan Agreement, including any accrued but unpaid
interest, on a dollar for dollar basis or in any combination of cash and such debt. Revlon, Inc. is under no
obligation to conduct an equity offering and MacAndrews & Forbes and its affiliates are under no
obligation to subscribe for shares should Revlon, Inc. elect to conduct an equity offering.

(e) 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit:

In July 2004, Products Corporation and MacAndrews & Forbes Inc. entered into a line of credit, with an
initial commitment of $152.0 million, which was reduced to $87.0 million in July 2005 and reduced from
$87.0 million to $50.0 million in January 2007 upon Revlon, Inc.’s consummation of the $100 Million Rights
Offering (as amended, the “2004 Consolidated MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit”). Pursuant to a
December 2006 amendment, upon consummation of the $100 Million Rights Offering, which was completed
in January 2007, $50.0 million of the line of credit remained available to Products Corporation through
January 31, 2008 on substantially the same terms (which line of credit would otherwise have terminated
pursuant to its terms upon the consummation of the $100 Million Rights Offering). The 2004 Consolidated
MacAndrews & Forbes Line of Credit expired in accordance with its terms on January 31, 2008. It was
undrawn during its entire term.

Long-Term Debt Maturities

The aggregate amounts of contractual long-term debt maturities at December 31, 2008 in the years

2009 through 2013 and thereafter are as follows:

Years ended December 31,

2009. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2010. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2011. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2012. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2013. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Thereafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Long-term
debt
maturities

$

18.9(a)
107.0(b)
396.5(c)
808.5(d)
—
—

Total long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$1,330.9(e)

(a) Amount refers to the amortization payment of $16.6 million required to be made under the terms of the 2006 Term Loan Facility
within 100 days after its 2008 fiscal year end representing 50% of its 2008 “Excess Cash Flow” (as defined in the 2006 Credit

F-32

Agreements) (which prepayment fully offsets Products Corporation’s required quarterly term loan amortization payments of
$2.1 million per quarter that would otherwise have been due on April 15, 2009, July 15, 2009, October 15, 2009, January 15, 2010,
April 15, 2010, July 15, 2010, October 15, 2010 and $1.9 million of the amortization payment otherwise due on January 15, 2011),
and regularly scheduled quarterly amortization payments required to be made under the terms of the 2006 Term Loan Facility

(b) Amount refers to the $107 million aggregate principal amount outstanding under the MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subor-
dinated Term Loan, after giving effect to Products Corporation $63.0 million partial repayment of such loan in September 2008
using a portion of the net proceeds from the Bozzano Sale Transaction. Pursuant to a November 2008 amendment, the
MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan is scheduled to mature on the earlier of (1) the date that Revlon, Inc.
issues equity with gross proceeds of at least $107 million, which proceeds would be contributed to Products Corporation and used
to repay the $107 million remaining aggregate principal balance of the MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan,
or (2) August 1, 2010.

(c) Amount refers to the principal balance due on the 91⁄2% Senior Notes, as well as regularly scheduled quarterly amortization
payments required to be made under the terms of the 2006 Term Loan Facility. The difference between this amount and the
carrying amount is due to the issuance of the $80.0 million in aggregate principal amount of the Additional 91⁄2% Senior Notes at a
discount, priced at 951⁄4% of par.

(d) Amount refers to the $808.5 million of aggregate principal amount that is expected to be outstanding under the 2006 Term Loan
Facility on its January 2012 maturity date (after giving effect to the regularly schedule quarterly amortization payments through
the January 2012 maturity date of such facility, as well as the amortization payment of $16.6 million required to be made under the
terms of the 2006 Term Loan Facility within 100 days after its 2008 fiscal year end representing 50% of its 2008 “Excess Cash
Flow” (which prepayment fully offsets Products Corporation’s required quarterly term loan amortization payments of $2.1 million
per quarter that would otherwise have been due on April 15, 2009, July 15, 2009, October 15, 2009, January 15, 2010, April 15,
2010, July 15, 2010, October 15, 2010 and $1.9 million of the amortization payment otherwise due on January 15, 2011), and
assuming no other prepayments, mandatory or otherwise).

(e) Amount excludes the $160.0 million 2006 Revolving Credit Facility, which as of December 31, 2008, was undrawn.

2004 Investment Agreement

In February 2004, Revlon, Inc.’s Board of Directors approved agreements with Fidelity Management &
Research Company (“Fidelity”) and MacAndrews & Forbes intended to strengthen the Company’s balance
sheet, as well as an Investment Agreement (as amended, the “2004 Investment Agreement”) with
MacAndrews & Forbes covering a series of transactions designed to reduce Products Corporation’s levels
of indebtedness. In March 2004, Revlon, Inc. exchanged approximately $804 million of Products Corpo-
ration’s debt, $54.6 million of Revlon, Inc. preferred stock and $9.9 million of accrued interest for
29,996,949 shares of Class A Common Stock (the “Revlon Exchange Transactions”) (as adjusted for
Revlon, Inc.’s September 2008 1-for-10 Reverse Stock Split — See Note 13,“Stockholders’ Equity”). As a
result of the Revlon Exchange Transactions, Revlon, Inc. reduced Products Corporation’s debt by approx-
imately $804 million on March 25, 2004.

In connection with the closing of the Revlon Exchange Transactions on March 25, 2004, MacAndrews &
Forbes Holdings executed a joinder agreement to the Revlon, Inc. registration rights agreement pursuant to
which all Class A Common Stock acquired by MacAndrews & Forbes pursuant to the 2004 Investment
Agreement are deemed to be registrable securities. Also, in connection with the Revlon Exchange Transactions,
in February 2004, Revlon, Inc. and Fidelity entered into a stockholders agreement (the “Stockholders Agree-
ment”) pursuant to which, among other things, (i) Revlon, Inc. agreed to continue to maintain a majority of
independent directors (as defined by New York Stock Exchange listing standards) on its Board of Directors, as it
currently does; (ii) Revlon, Inc. established and maintains a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
of the Board of Directors; and (iii) Revlon, Inc. agreed to certain restrictions with respect to Revlon, Inc.’s
conducting any business or entering into any transactions or series of related transactions with any of its
affiliates, any holders of 10% or more of the outstanding voting stock or any affiliates of such holders (in each
case, other than its subsidiaries). The Stockholders Agreement will terminate when Fidelity ceases to be the
beneficial holder of at least 5% of Revlon, Inc.’s outstanding voting stock.

Pursuant to the 2004 Investment Agreement, in addition to the Revlon Exchange Transactions, Revlon,
Inc. committed to conduct further rights and equity offerings (such equity offerings, together with the Revlon
Exchange Transactions, are referred to as the “Debt Reduction Transactions”). Under the 2004 Investment
Agreement, MacAndrews & Forbes agreed to take, or cause to be taken, all commercially reasonable actions
to facilitate the Debt Reduction Transactions, including back-stopping certain rights offerings.

F-33

In August 2005, Revlon, Inc. announced its plan to issue $185.0 million of equity. In connection with
such plans, MacAndrews & Forbes and Revlon, Inc. amended the 2004 Investment Agreement in August
2005 to increase MacAndrews & Forbes’ commitment to purchase such equity as was necessary to ensure
that Revlon, Inc. issued $185.0 million in equity. In March 2006 Revlon, Inc. successfully completed a
$110 million rights offering of its Class A Common Stock and a related private placement to MacAndrews &
Forbes (together, the ”$110 Million Rights Offering”). Having completed the $110 Million Rights Offering,
to facilitate Revlon, Inc.’s plans to issue the full $185 million of equity, during 2006 Revlon, Inc. and
MacAndrews & Forbes entered into various amendments to the 2004 Investment Agreement to extend the
time for completing the remaining $75 million of such issuance from March 31, 2006 until March 31, 2007, in
each case by extending MacAndrews & Forbes’ $75 million back-stop to such later date.

In January 2007, Revlon, Inc. successfully completed a $100 million rights offering of its Class A
Common Stock and a related private placement to MacAndrews & Forbes (together, the ”$100 Million
Rights Offering”). In each case proceeds were used by the Company to reduce indebtedness, as described
below, and, as each rights offering was fully subscribed, in each case MacAndrews & Forbes was not
required to purchase any additional shares beyond its pro rata subscription in connection with its back-stop
obligations under the 2004 Investment Agreement.

$110 Million Rights Offering

In March 2006, Revlon, Inc. successfully completed the $110 Million Rights Offering which allowed
each stockholder of record of Revlon, Inc.’s Class A and Class B Common Stock as of the close of business
on February 13, 2006, the record date set by Revlon, Inc.’s Board of Directors, to purchase additional shares
of Class A Common Stock. The subscription price for each share of Class A Common Stock purchased in
the $110 Million Rights Offering, including shares purchased in the private placement by MacAndrews &
Forbes, was $28.00 per share (as adjusted for Revlon, Inc.’s September 2008 1-for-10 Reverse Stock
Split — See Note 13, “Stockholders’ Equity”).

Upon completing the $110 Million Rights Offering, Revlon, Inc. promptly transferred the net proceeds
to Products Corporation, which it used to redeem $109.7 million aggregate principal amount of its 85⁄8% Senior
Subordinated Notes in satisfaction of the applicable requirements under the 2004 Credit Agreement, at an
aggregate redemption price of $111.8 million, including $2.1 million of accrued and unpaid interest up to, but
not including, the redemption date. (See “2008 Transactions — Full Repayment of the 85⁄8% Senior Sub-
ordinated Notes with the MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan” for a description of the full
repayment of the 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes on their February 1, 2008 maturity date).

In completing the $110 Million Rights Offering, Revlon, Inc. issued an additional 3,928,571 shares of its
Class A Common Stock, including 1,588,566 shares subscribed for by public shareholders (other than
MacAndrews & Forbes) and 2,340,005 shares issued to MacAndrews & Forbes in a private placement
directly from Revlon, Inc. pursuant to a Stock Purchase Agreement between Revlon, Inc. and
MacAndrews & Forbes, dated as of February 17, 2006 (in each case such share amounts are adjusted
for Revlon, Inc.’s September 2008 1-for-10 reverse stock split). The shares issued to MacAndrews & Forbes
represented the number of shares of Revlon, Inc.’s Class A Common Stock that MacAndrews & Forbes
would otherwise have been entitled to purchase pursuant to its basic subscription privilege in the $110
Million Rights Offering (which was approximately 60% of the shares of Revlon, Inc.’s Class A Common
Stock offered in the $110 Million Rights Offering).

$100 Million Rights Offering

In January 2007, Revlon, Inc. successfully completed the $100 Million Rights Offering, which allowed
each stockholder of record of Revlon, Inc.’s Class A and Class B Common Stock as of the close of business
on December 11, 2006, the record date set by Revlon, Inc.’s Board of Directors, to purchase additional
shares of Class A Common Stock. The subscription price for each share of Class A Common Stock
purchased in the $100 Million Rights Offering, including shares purchased in the private placement by

F-34

MacAndrews & Forbes, was $10.50 per share (as adjusted for Revlon, Inc.’s September 2008 1-for-10
Reverse Stock Split — See Note 13, “Stockholders’ Equity”).

Upon completing the $100 Million Rights Offering, Revlon, Inc. promptly transferred the net proceeds
to Products Corporation, which it used in February 2007 to redeem $50.0 million aggregate principal
amount of its 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes (prior to their full repayment in February 2008), at an
aggregate redemption price of $50.3 million, including $0.3 million of accrued and unpaid interest up to, but
not including, the redemption date. In January 2007, Products Corporation used the remainder of such
proceeds to repay approximately $43.3 million of indebtedness outstanding under Products Corporation’s
2006 Revolving Credit Facility, without any permanent reduction in that commitment, after paying
approximately $2.0 million of fees and expenses incurred in connection with such offering, with approx-
imately $5 million of the remaining net proceeds being available for general corporate purposes. Following
such partial redemption of the 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes, there remained outstanding $167.4 million
in aggregate principal amount of such notes, which Products Corporation repaid in full on the February 1,
2008 maturity date of the 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes, using the proceeds of the MacAndrews &
Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan (See “2008 Transactions — Full Repayment of the 85⁄8% Senior
Subordinated Notes with the MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan”).

In completing the $100 Million Rights Offering, in January 2007, Revlon, Inc. issued an additional
9,523,809 shares of its Class A Common Stock, including 3,784,747 shares subscribed for by public
shareholders (other than MacAndrews & Forbes) and 5,739,062 shares issued to MacAndrews & Forbes
in a private placement directly from Revlon, Inc. pursuant to a Stock Purchase Agreement between Revlon,
Inc. and MacAndrews & Forbes, dated as of December 18, 2006 (in each case such share amounts are
adjusted for Revlon, Inc.’s September 2008 1-for-10 Reverse Stock Split). The shares issued to MacAn-
drews & Forbes represented the number of shares of Revlon, Inc.’s Class A Common Stock that
MacAndrews & Forbes would otherwise have been entitled to purchase pursuant to its basic subscription
privilege in the $100 Million Rights Offering (which was approximately 60% of the shares of Revlon, Inc.’s
Class A Common Stock offered in the $100 Million Rights Offering).

Liquidity Considerations

The Company expects that operating revenues, cash on hand and funds available for borrowing under
the 2006 Revolving Credit Facility and other permitted lines of credit will be sufficient to enable the
Company to cover its operating expenses for 2009, including cash requirements in connection with the
payment of operating expenses, including expenses in connection with the execution of the Company’s
business strategy, purchases of permanent wall displays, capital expenditure requirements, payments in
connection with the Company’s restructuring programs, severance not otherwise included in the Compa-
ny’s restructuring programs, debt service payments and costs and regularly scheduled pension and post-
retirement plan contributions and benefit payments.

There can be no assurance that available funds will be sufficient to meet the Company’s cash require-
ments on a consolidated basis. If the Company’s anticipated level of revenues are not achieved because of, for
example, decreased consumer spending in response to weak economic conditions or weakness in the
cosmetics category in the mass retail channel; adverse changes in currency; decreased sales of the Company’s
products as a result of increased competitive activities by the Company’s competitors; changes in consumer
purchasing habits, including with respect to shopping channels; retailer inventory management; retailer space
reconfigurations or reductions in retailer display space; less than anticipated results from the Company’s
existing or new products or from its advertising and/or marketing plans; or if the Company’s expenses,
including, without limitation, for advertising and promotions or for returns related to any reduction of retail
space, product discontinuances or otherwise, exceed the anticipated level of expenses, the Company’s current
sources of funds may be insufficient to meet the Company’s cash requirements.

In the event of a decrease in demand for the Company’s products, reduced sales, lack of increases in
demand and sales, changes in consumer purchasing habits, including with respect to shopping channels,
retailer inventory management, retailer space reconfigurations or reductions in retailer display space,

F-35

product discontinuances and/or advertising and promotion expenses or returns expenses exceeding its
expectations or less than anticipated results from the Company’s existing or new products or from its
advertising and/or marketing plans, any such development, if significant, could reduce Products Corpo-
ration’s revenues and could adversely affect Products Corporation’s ability to comply with certain financial
covenants under the 2006 Credit Agreements and in such event the Company could be required to take
measures, including, among other things, reducing discretionary spending.

If the Company is unable to satisfy its cash requirements from the sources identified above or comply
with its debt covenants, the Company could be required to adopt one or more of the following alternatives:

• delaying the implementation of or revising certain aspects of the Company’s business strategy;

•

•

reducing or delaying purchases of wall displays or advertising or promotional expenses;

reducing or delaying capital spending;

• delaying, reducing or revising the Company’s restructuring programs;

•

•

•

•

refinancing Products Corporation’s indebtedness;

selling assets or operations;

seeking additional capital contributions and/or loans from MacAndrews & Forbes, the Company’s
other affiliates and/or third parties;

selling additional Revlon, Inc. equity securities or debt securities of Revlon, Inc. or Products
Corporation; or

•

reducing other discretionary spending.

There can be no assurance that the Company would be able to take any of the actions referred to above
because of a variety of commercial or market factors or constraints in Products Corporation’s debt
instruments, including, without limitation, market conditions being unfavorable for an equity or debt
issuance, additional capital contributions and/or loans not being available from affiliates and/or third
parties, or that the transactions may not be permitted under the terms of Products Corporation’s various
debt instruments then in effect, such as due to restrictions on the incurrence of debt, incurrence of liens,
asset dispositions and related party transactions. In addition, such actions, if taken, may not enable the
Company to satisfy its cash requirements or enable Products Corporation to comply with its debt covenants
if the actions do not generate a sufficient amount of additional capital.

Revlon, Inc., as a holding company, will be dependent on the earnings and cash flow of, and dividends
and distributions from, Products Corporation to pay its expenses and to pay any cash dividend or distribution
on Revlon, Inc.’s Class A Common Stock that may be authorized by Revlon, Inc.’s Board of Directors. The
terms of the 2006 Credit Agreements, the indenture governing the 91⁄2% Senior Notes and the MacAndrews &
Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan Agreement generally restrict Products Corporation from paying
dividends or making distributions, except that Products Corporation is permitted to pay dividends and make
distributions to Revlon, Inc. to enable Revlon, Inc., among other things, to pay expenses incidental to being a
public holding company, including, among other things, professional fees, such as legal, accounting and
insurance fees, regulatory fees, such as SEC filing fees, NYSE listing fees and other expenses related to being a
public holding company and, subject to certain limitations, to pay dividends or make distributions in certain
circumstances to finance the purchase by Revlon, Inc. of its Class A Common Stock in connection with the
delivery of such Class A Common Stock to grantees under the Stock Plan.

10. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The fair value of the Company’s debt, including the current portion of long-term debt, is based on the
quoted market prices for the same issues or on the current rates offered to the Company for debt of the
same remaining maturities. The estimated fair value of such debt at December 31, 2008 and 2007,

F-36

respectively, was approximately $360.1 million and $26.4 million less than the carrying values of
$1,329.1 million and $1,438.9 million, respectively.

Products Corporation also maintains standby and trade letters of credit with certain banks for various
corporate purposes under which Products Corporation is obligated, of which approximately $13.1 million
and $14.6 million (including amounts available under credit agreements in effect at that time) were
maintained at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Included in these amounts is approximately
$9.3 million and $9.9 million, at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, in standby letters of credit, which
support Products Corporation’s self-insurance programs. The estimated liability under such programs is
accrued by Products Corporation.

The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, trade receivables, notes

receivable, accounts payable and short-term borrowings approximate their fair values.

Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company uses derivative financial instruments, primarily (1) foreign currency forward exchange
contracts, for the purpose of managing foreign currency exchange risk by reducing the effects of fluctuations
in foreign currency exchange rates and (2) interest rate swap transactions, including, without limitation, the
Interest Rate Swaps entered into in September 2007 and April 2008, for the purpose of managing interest
rate risk by offseting the effects of floating interest rates associated with the Products Corporation’s
indebtedness. The foreign currency forward exchange contracts are entered into primarily for the purpose
of hedging anticipated inventory purchases and certain intercompany payments denominated in foreign
currencies and generally have maturities of less than one year. In September 2007 and April 2008, Products
Corporation executed two floating-to-fixed interest rate swap transactions (the “2007 Interest Rate Swap”
and the “2008 Interest Rate Swap” and together the “Interest Rate Swaps”) each with a notional amount of
$150.0 million over a period of two years relating to indebtedness under Products Corporation’s 2006 Term
Loan Facility. As required by SFAS No. 161, quantitative information regarding the fair values of the
Company’s derivative financial instruments is as follows:

Fair Values of Derivative Instruments as of December 31,
Assets
Liabilities

Balance Sheet
Classification

2008
Fair
Value

2007
Fair
Value

Balance Sheet
Classification

2008
Fair
Value

2007
Fair
Value

Derivatives under
SFAS No. 133:
Derivatives designated as
hedging instruments:
Interest rate swaps(a):
2007 Interest Rate

Swap . . . . . . . . . . . . . Prepaid expenses

Other long-term assets

2008 Interest Rate

Swap . . . . . . . . . . . . . Prepaid expenses

Other long-term assets

Derivatives not designated
as hedging instruments:
Foreign currency

forward exchange
contracts(b) . . . . . . . . Prepaid expenses

$ —
—

0.8
—

2.2

$3.0

$0.1

Accrued expenses
— Other long-term liabilities

— Accrued expenses
— Other long-term liabilities

$3.8
—

1.7
1.0

$0.9
1.4

—
—

0.1

Accrued expenses

$0.2

0.2

$6.7

0.4

$2.7

(a) Fair value is determined by using observable market transactions of spot and forward rates.

(b) Fair value is determined by using the applicable LIBOR index.

F-37

In addition, quantitative information regarding the gains (losses) of the Company’s derivative financial

instruments, as required by SFAS No. 161, is as follows:

Derivative Instruments Gain (Loss) Effect on Consolidated Statement of
Operations as of December 31,

Amount of Gain
(Loss)
Recognized in
OCI
(Effective
Portion)

2008

2007

Income Statement
Classification
of Gain (Loss)
Reclassified from
OCI to Income

Amount of Gain
(Loss)
Reclassified
from OCI
to Income
(Effective
Portion)

Amount of Gain
(Loss)
Recognized in
Interest
Expense
(Ineffective
Portion)

2008

2007

2008

2007

Derivatives designated as cash
flow hedges:
Interest rate swaps:

2007 Interest Rate Swap . . . . .
2008 Interest Rate Swap . . . . .

$(3.7)
(1.7)

$(2.1)

Interest expense
— Interest expense

$(2.1)
0.1

$ 0.4

$ — $(0.1)
—

— (0.2)

Foreign currency forward

exchange contracts(a) . . . . . . . .

(5.4)

(2.1)

(2.0)

0.4

(0.2)

(0.1)

—

— Cost of goods sold

—

(0.4)

—

—

$(5.4)

$(2.1)

$(2.0)

$ — $(0.2)

$(0.1)

Amount of
Gain (Loss)
Recognized in
Foreign
currency gains
(losses), net
2007

2008

Derivatives not designated
as hedging instruments:
Foreign currency forward

Exchange contracts . . . . . . . . . . $4.5

$(2.0)

(a) Represents losses accumulated prior to the Company’s election to discontinue hedge accounting which are

reversed into earnings when the underlying transactions to the derivative instrument occur.

F-38

11.

INCOME TAXES

The Company’s income (loss) before income taxes and the applicable provision (benefit) for income

taxes are as follows:

Year Ended December 31,
2007

2006

2008

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes:
United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$(22.0)
51.2

$(54.0)
42.5

$(244.4)
12.4

$ 29.2

$(11.5)

$(232.0)

Provision (benefit) for income taxes:

United States federal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State and local . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 0.6
(3.0)
18.5

$ 0.2
(0.2)
7.5

$

0.2
1.2
18.7

Current . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Benefits of operating loss carryforwards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Resolution of tax matters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 16.1

$ 7.5

$ 20.1

$ 31.7
2.8
(18.4)
—

$ 20.9
(4.2)
(3.3)
(5.9)

$ 22.5
0.2
(2.6)
—

$ 16.1

$ 7.5

$ 20.1

The actual tax on income (loss) before income taxes is reconciled to the applicable statutory federal

income tax rate as follows:

Year Ended December 31,
2007

2006

2008

Computed expected tax expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State and local taxes, net of U.S. federal income tax benefit . . . . . . . . .
Foreign and U.S. tax effects attributable to operations outside the

U.S. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Change in valuation allowance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign dividends subject to tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Resolution of tax matters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 10.2
(2.0)

$ (4.0)
(0.1)

$(81.2)
0.8

0.5
(18.2)
26.7
—
(1.1)

6.2
(2.4)
12.0
(5.9)
1.7

3.0
90.9
4.8
—
1.8

Tax expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 16.1

$ 7.5

$ 20.1

F-39

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets

and deferred tax liabilities at December 31, 2008 and 2007 are presented below:

Deferred tax assets:

Accounts receivable, principally due to doubtful accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net operating loss carryforwards — U.S.
Net operating loss carryforwards — foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accruals and related reserves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Employee benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State and local taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Advertising, sales discount, returns and coupon redemptions . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total gross deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less valuation allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Deferred tax liabilities:

Plant, equipment and other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total gross deferred tax liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

December 31,

2008

2007

$

0.9
7.7
208.7
77.0
1.1
49.2
4.9
34.5
29.2

413.2
(391.2)

22.0

(15.7)
(0.1)

(15.8)

$

0.8
10.0
281.8
112.2
1.8
53.3
6.6
38.3
23.9

528.7
(501.0)

27.7

(15.5)
(3.6)

(19.1)

Net deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

6.2

$

8.6

The valuation allowance decreased by $109.8 million during 2008 and decreased by $59.7 million
during 2007. Foreign-exchange fluctuations and expirations and other eliminations of operating loss
carryforwards were the primary drivers of the decrease in the valuation allowance during 2008. Expirations
and other eliminations of operating loss carryforwards were the primary drivers of the decrease in the
valuation allowance during 2007.

In assessing the recoverability of its deferred tax assets, management considers whether some portion
or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized based on the recognition threshold and measurement of a
tax position in accordance with FIN 48. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon
the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become
deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future
taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. Based upon the level of historical
taxable income for certain international markets and projections for future taxable income over the periods
in which the deferred tax assets are recoverable, management believes that it is more likely than not that the
Company will realize the benefits of the net deferred tax assets existing at December 31, 2008 based on the
recognition threshold and measurement of a tax position in accordance with FIN 48.

After December 31, 2008, the Company has tax loss carryforwards of approximately $801.2 million, of
which $261.9 million are foreign and $539.3 million are domestic (including $115.6 million of consolidated
federal net operating losses (“CNOLs”) available from the MacAndrews & Forbes Group, as discussed in
the paragraph below). The losses expire in future years as follows: 2009-$78.2 million; 2010-$13.4 million;
2011-$2.4 million; 2012-$9.5 million; 2013 and beyond-$522.1 million; and unlimited-$175.5 million. The
Company could receive the benefit of such tax loss carryforwards only to the extent it has taxable income
during the carryforward periods in the applicable tax jurisdictions.

As a result of the Company’s adoption of FIN 48 effective as of January 1, 2007, the Company reduced
its total tax reserves by approximately $23.2 million, which resulted in a corresponding reduction of

F-40

accumulated deficit. As of the date of adoption and after the impact of recognizing the decrease in tax
reserves noted above, the Company had tax reserves of $57.7 million, all of which, to the extent reduced and
unutilized in future periods, would affect the Company’s effective tax rate. The Company remains subject to
examination of its income tax returns in various jurisdictions including, without limitation, the U.S. (fed-
eral), for tax years ended December 31, 2005 through December 31, 2008, and Australia and South Africa,
for tax years ended December 31, 2004 through December 31, 2008. The Company classifies interest and
penalties recognized under FIN 48 as a component of the provision for income taxes in the consolidated
statement of operations. After the implementation of FIN 48 effective as of January 1, 2007, the Company
had $22.8 million of accrued interest and $1.1 million of accrued tax penalties included in tax reserves.
During the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company recognized through the consolidated
statement of operations a reduction of $3.2 million and $2.3 million in accrued interest and penalties,
respectively.

At December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company had tax reserves of $50.9 million and $53.9 million,
respectively, including $18.5 million and $21.7 million of accrued interest, respectively, included in tax
reserves. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of the tax reserves is as follows:

Balance at January 1, 2007 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Increase based on tax positions taken in a prior year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Decrease based on tax positions taken in a prior year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Increase based on tax positions taken in the current year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Decrease related to settlements with taxing authorities and changes in law . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Decrease resulting from the lapse of statutes of limitations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Balance at December 31, 2007 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Increase based on tax positions taken in a prior year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Decrease based on tax positions taken in a prior year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Increase based on tax positions taken in the current year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Decrease related to settlements with taxing authorities and changes in law . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Decrease resulting from the lapse of statutes of limitations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 57.7
5.3
—
5.5
(7.4)
(7.2)

$ 53.9
5.6
(10.1)
7.4
—
(5.9)

Balance at December 31, 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 50.9

In addition, the Company believes that it is reasonably possible that its tax reserves during 2009 will
increase by approximately $2.9 million as a result of changes in various tax positions, each of which is
individually insignificant.

As a result of the closing of the Revlon Exchange Transactions, as of March 25, 2004, Revlon, Inc.,
Products Corporation and their U.S. subsidiaries were no longer included in the the affiliated group of
which MacAndrews & Forbes was the common parent (the “MacAndrews & Forbes Group”) for federal
income tax purposes (see further discussion immediately below). The Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (as
amended, the “Code”) and the Treasury regulations issued thereunder govern both the calculation of the
amount and allocation to the members of the MacAndrews & Forbes Group of any CNOLs of the group
that will be available to offset Revlon, Inc.’s taxable income and the taxable income of its U.S. subsidiaries,
including Products Corporation, for the taxable years beginning after March 25, 2004. Only the amount of
any CNOLs that the MacAndrews & Forbes Group did not absorb in tax years ended on or before
December 31, 2004 will be available to be allocated to Revlon, Inc. and its U.S. subsidiaries, including
Products Corporation, for their taxable years beginning on March 26, 2004. After March 25, 2004, the
Company had available from the MacAndrews & Forbes Group, $415.9 million in U.S. federal net operating
losses and $15.2 million of alternative minimum tax losses. As a result of the expiration of $24.8 million in
U.S. federal net operating losses at the end of 2006, $101.5 million at the end of 2007 and $139.8 million at
the end of 2008, and the Company’s use of U.S. federal net operating losses of $34.3 million during 2008,
after December 31, 2008, the Company has available from the MacAndrews & Forbes Group $115.6 million
of CNOLs. During 2008, the Company also used $15.2 million of alternative minimum tax losses from the

F-41

MacAndrews & Forbes Group and, as a result, after December 31, 2008, the Company has no alternative
minimum tax losses available from the MacAndrews & Forbes Group. The amounts set forth in this
paragraph are subject to change if the Internal Revenue Service adjusts the results of the MacAndrews &
Forbes Group for tax years ended on or before December 31, 2004.

The Company has not provided for U.S. Federal and foreign withholding taxes on $48.4 million of
foreign subsidiaries’ undistributed earnings as of December 31, 2008, because such earnings are intended to
be indefinitely reinvested overseas.

The amount of unrecognized deferred tax liabilities for temporary differences related to investments in

undistributed earnings is not practicable to determine at this time.

In June 1992, Revlon Holdings (as hereinafter defined), Revlon, Inc., Products Corporation and
certain of its subsidiaries, and MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings entered into a tax sharing agreement (as
subsequently amended and restated, the “MacAndrews & Forbes Tax Sharing Agreement”), pursuant to
which MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings agreed to indemnify Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation against
federal, state or local income tax liabilities of the MacAndrews & Forbes Group (other than in respect of
Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation) for taxable periods beginning on or after January 1, 1992 during
which Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation or a subsidiary of Products Corporation was a member of
such group. In these taxable periods, Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation were included in the
MacAndrews & Forbes Group, and Revlon, Inc.’s and Products Corporation’s federal taxable income
and loss were included in such group’s consolidated tax return filed by MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings.
Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation were also included in certain state and local tax returns of
MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings or its subsidiaries. Pursuant to the MacAndrews & Forbes Tax Sharing
Agreement, for all such taxable periods, Products Corporation was required to pay to Revlon, Inc., which in
turn was required to pay to Revlon Holdings, amounts equal to the taxes that Products Corporation would
otherwise have had to pay if it were to file separate federal, state or local income tax returns (including any
amounts determined to be due as a result of a redetermination arising from an audit or otherwise of the
consolidated or combined tax liability relating to any such period which was attributable to Products
Corporation), except that Products Corporation was not entitled to carry back any losses to taxable periods
ending prior to January 1, 1992. The MacAndrews & Forbes Tax Sharing Agreement remains in effect solely
for taxable periods beginning on or after January 1, 1992, through and including March 25, 2004.

Following the closing of the Revlon Exchange Transactions in March 2004, Revlon, Inc. became the
parent of a new consolidated group for federal income tax purposes and Products Corporation’s federal
taxable income and loss will be included in such group’s consolidated tax returns. Accordingly, Revlon, Inc.
and Products Corporation entered into a tax sharing agreement (the “Revlon Tax Sharing Agreement”)
pursuant to which Products Corporation will be required to pay to Revlon, Inc. amounts equal to the taxes
that Products Corporation would otherwise have had to pay if Products Corporation were to file separate
federal, state or local income tax returns, limited to the amount, and payable only at such times, as Revlon,
Inc. will be required to make payments to the applicable taxing authorities.

There were no federal tax payments or payments in lieu of taxes from Revlon, Inc. to Revlon Holdings
pursuant to the MacAndrews & Forbes Tax Sharing Agreement in 2008 with respect to periods covered by
the MacAndrews & Forbes Tax Sharing Agreement. There will be a federal tax payment of $0.6 million
from Products Corporation to Revlon, Inc. pursuant to the Revlon Tax Sharing Agreement in respect of
2008. The Company does not expect that there will be federal tax payments or payments in lieu of taxes
from Revlon, Inc. to Revlon Holdings pursuant to the MacAndrews & Forbes Tax Sharing Agreement with
respect to periods covered by the MacAndrews & Forbes Tax Sharing Agreement or from Products
Corporation to Revlon, Inc. pursuant to the Revlon Tax Sharing Agreement in respect of 2009.

Pursuant to the asset transfer agreement referred to in Note 16, Products Corporation assumed all tax
liabilities of Revlon Holdings other than (i) certain income tax liabilities arising prior to January 1, 1992 to
the extent such liabilities exceeded reserves on Revlon Holdings’ books as of January 1, 1992 or were not of
the nature reserved for and (ii) other tax liabilities to the extent such liabilities are related to the business
and assets retained by Revlon Holdings.

F-42

12. SAVINGS PLAN, PENSION AND POST-RETIREMENT BENEFITS

Savings Plan:

The Company offers a qualified defined contribution plan for its U.S.-based employees, the Revlon
Employees’ Savings, Investment and Profit Sharing Plan (as amended, the “Savings Plan”), which allows
eligible participants to contribute up to 25%, and highly compensated employees to contribute up to 6%, of
qualified compensation through payroll deductions, subject to certain annual dollar limitations imposed by
the Code. The Company matches employee contributions at fifty cents for each dollar contributed up to the
first 6% of eligible compensation (i.e., for a total match of 3% of employee contributions). In 2008, 2007
and 2006, the Company made cash matching contributions to the Savings Plan of approximately $2.7 mil-
lion, $2.6 million and $2.8 million, respectively.

Pension Benefits:

The Company sponsors a number of qualified defined benefit pension plans covering a substantial
portion of the Company’s employees in the U.S. The Company also has nonqualified pension plans which
provide benefits for certain U.S. and non-U.S. employees, and for U.S. employees in excess of IRS
limitations in the U.S. and in certain limited cases contractual benefits for designated officers of the
Company. These nonqualified plans are funded from the general assets of the Company.

Other Post-retirement Benefits:

The Company previously sponsored an unfunded retiree benefit plan, which provides death benefits
payable to beneficiaries of a very limited number of former employees. Participation in this plan was limited
to participants enrolled as of December 31, 1993. The Company also administers an unfunded medical
insurance plan on behalf of Revlon Holdings, certain costs of which have been apportioned to Revlon
Holdings under the transfer agreements among Revlon, Inc., Products Corporation and MacAndrews &
Forbes. (See Note 16, “Related Party Transactions — Transfer Agreements”).

Adoption of SFAS No. 158:

Effective as of January 1, 2007, the Company early adopted the measurement date provisions of
SFAS No. 158. These provisions of SFAS No. 158 require the Company to measure defined benefit plan
assets and obligations as of the date of the Company’s fiscal year-end, which the Company has applied as of
the beginning of the fiscal year ending December 31, 2007, rather than using a September 30th measurement
date. Due to the Company’s early adoption of the measurement date provisions under SFAS No. 158, the
Company recognized a net reduction to the beginning balance of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
of $10.3 million, which is comprised of (1) a $9.4 million reduction to Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Loss due to the revaluation of the pension liability and (2) a $0.9 million reduction to Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Loss of amortization of prior service costs and actuarial gains/losses over the period from
October 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006. In addition, the Company recognized a $2.9 million increase to the
beginning balance of Accumulated Deficit for the total net periodic benefit costs incurred from October 1,
2006 to December 31, 2006.

F-43

The following table provides an aggregate reconciliation of the projected benefit obligations, plan
assets, funded status and amounts recognized in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements related
to the Company’s significant pension and other post-retirement plans.

Pension Plans

Other
Post-retirement
Benefit Plans

2008

2007

2008

2007

Change in Benefit Obligation:

Benefit obligation — beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . .
Service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Plan amendments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Actuarial gain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Special termination benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Benefits paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign exchange gain (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Plan participant contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$(578.3)
(8.3)
(34.5)
(0.2)
11.0
—
35.1
15.4
(0.3)

$(599.3)
(9.2)
(33.1)
(0.7)
35.1
(0.1)
31.5
(2.3)
(0.2)

$(14.0)
(0.1)
(0.8)
—
0.1
—
1.0
0.6
—

$(15.1)
—
(0.9)
—
1.1
—
1.0
(0.1)
—

Benefit obligation — end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$(560.1)

$(578.3)

$(13.2)

$(14.0)

Change in Plan Assets:

Fair value of plan assets — beginning of year . . . . . .
Actual (loss) return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Employer contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Plan participant contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Benefits paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign exchange (loss) gain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 473.7
(96.7)
11.8
0.2
(35.1)
(11.6)

$ 438.7
27.7
37.1
0.2
(31.5)
1.5

$ —
—
1.0
—
(1.0)
—

$ —
—
1.0
—
(1.0)
—

Fair value of plan assets — end of year . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 342.3

$ 473.7

$ —

$ —

Unfunded status of plans at December 31,. . . . . . . . . . .

$(217.8)

$(105.5)

$(13.2)

$(14.0)

Overfunded status of plans at December 31, . . . . . . . . .

$ —

$

0.9

$ —

$ —

In respect of the Company’s pension plans and other post-retirement benefit plans, amounts recog-
nized in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, consist
of the following:

Other long-term assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued expenses and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pension and other post-retirement benefit liabilities . . .

Accumulated other comprehensive loss . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Pension Plans

December 31,

Other
Post-retirement
Benefit Plans

2008

2007

2008

2007

$ —
(6.3)
(211.5)

(217.8)
192.0

$

0.9
(6.1)
(99.4)

(104.6)
72.3

$ —
(1.0)
(12.2)

(13.2)
2.1

$ —
(1.0)
(13.0)

(14.0)
2.6

$ (25.8)

$ (32.3)

$(11.1)

$(11.4)

With respect to the above accrued net periodic benefit costs, the Company has recorded receivables
from affiliates of $2.8 million and $2.7 million at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, relating to
pension plan liabilities retained by such affiliates.

F-44

The projected benefit obligation, accumulated benefit obligation, and fair value of plan assets for the

Company’s pension plans are as follows:

Projected benefit obligation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accumulated benefit obligation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fair value of plan assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2008

$560.1
550.3
342.3

December 31,
2007

$578.3
563.7
473.7

2006

$599.3
578.8
438.7

The components of net periodic benefit cost for the pension plans and other post-retirement benefit

plans are as follows:

Net periodic benefit cost:
Service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expected return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortization of prior service credit . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortization of actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Settlement cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Curtailment cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Portion allocated to Revlon Holdings . . . . . . . . .

Pension Plans

Other
Post-retirement
Benefit Plans

Years Ended December 31,

2008

2007

2006

2008

2007

2006

$ 8.3
34.5
(37.2)
(0.4)
1.3
—
—

6.5
(0.1)

$ 9.2
33.1
(36.8)
(0.5)
2.9
—
0.1

8.0
(0.1)

$ 10.0
32.1
(31.8)
(0.5)
6.6
0.1
(0.8)

15.7
(0.1)

$ — $0.1
0.9
0.8
—
—
—
—
0.2
0.2
—
—
—
—

1.0
—

1.2
—

$ —
0.8
—
—
0.1
—
—

0.9
—

$ 6.4

$ 7.9

$ 15.6

$1.0

$1.2

$0.9

Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss at December 31, 2008 in respect of the
Company’s pension plans and other post-retirement plans, which have not yet been recognized as a
component of net periodic pension cost, are as follows:

Net actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prior service credit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Portion allocated to Revlon Holdings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$192.8
(0.8)

192.0
(0.4)

$191.6

Pension Benefits

Post-retirement
Benefits

$ 2.1
—

2.1
(0.1)

Total

$194.9
(0.8)

194.1
(0.5)

$ 2.0

$193.6

The total actuarial losses in respect of the Company’s pension plans and other post-retirement plans
included in accumulated other comprehensive income at December 31, 2008 and expected to be recognized
in net periodic pension cost during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 is $13.3 million and $0.1 million,
respectively. The total prior service credits in respect of the Company’s pension plans and other post-
retirement plans included in accumulated other comprehensive income at December 31, 2008 and expected
to be recognized in net periodic pension cost during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 is $0.4 million
and nil, respectively.

F-45

The following weighted-average assumptions were used to determine the Company’s projected benefit

obligation of the Company’s U.S. and International pension plans at the end of the respective year:

U.S. Plans

International
Plans

2008

2007

2008

2007

Discount rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Rate of future compensation increases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

6.35% 6.24% 6.40% 5.70%
4.00

4.30

4.00

4.00

The following weighted-average assumptions were used to determine the Company’s net periodic

benefit cost of the Company’s U.S. and International pension plans during the respective year:

Discount rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expected long-term return on plan assets. . . . .
Rate of future compensation increases . . . . . . .

U.S. Plans
2007

International Plans
2007

2006

2008

2008
6.24% 5.75% 5.50%(a) 5.70% 5.00% 5.00%
8.25
4.00

8.50
4.00

6.70
3.70

8.50
4.00

6.90
4.30

6.70
3.90

2006

(a) As a result of the Company’s early adoption of the measurement date provisions of SFAS No. 158,
and applying a December 31st measurement date rather than a September 30th measurement as of
the beginning of the fiscal year ending December 31, 2007, the discount rate used to determine the net
periodic benefit cost for the Company’s U.S. plans during 2006 was 5.50% and 5.75% for the nine
months and final three months of 2006, respectively.

The 6.35% weighted-average discount rate used to determine the Company’s projected benefit
obligation of the Company’s U.S. plans at the end of 2008 was derived by reference to appropriate
benchmark yields on high quality corporate bonds, with terms which approximate the duration of the
benefit payments and the relevant benchmark bond indices considering the individual plan’s characteristics,
such as the Citigroup Pension Discount Curve, to select a rate at which the Company believes the
U.S. pension benefits could have been effectively settled. The discount rates used to determine the
Company’s projected benefit obligation of the Company’s primary international plans at the end of
2008 were derived from similar local studies, in conjunction with local actuarial consultants and asset
managers.

During the first quarter of each year, the Company selects an expected long-term rate of return on its
pension plan assets. The Company considers a number of factors to determine its expected long-term rate of
return on plan assets assumption, including, without limitation, recent and historical performance of plan
assets, asset allocation and other third-party studies and surveys. The Company considered the plan
portfolios’ asset allocations over a variety of time periods and compared them with third-party studies and
reviewed the performance of the capital markets in recent years and other factors and advice from various
third parties, such as the pension plans’ advisors, investment managers and actuaries. While the Company
considered both the recent performance and the historical performance of plan assets, the Company’s
assumptions are based primarily on its estimates of long-term, prospective rates of return. Using the
aforementioned methodologies, in early 2008 and before the significant declines in the financial markets in
late 2008, the Company selected the 8.25% long-term rate of return on plan assets assumption used for the
U.S. pension plans during 2008. Differences between actual and expected asset returns are recognized in the
net periodic benefit cost over the remaining service period of the active participating employees.

The rate of future compensation increases is an assumption used by the actuarial consultants for

pension accounting and is determined based on the Company’s current expectation for such increases.

The following table presents U.S. and international pension plan assets information at December 31,

2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively:

U.S. Plans
2007

2006

2008

International Plans
2007

2006

2008

Fair value of plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$309.4

$424.4

$380.3

$32.9

$49.3

$43.7

F-46

The Investment Committee for the Company’s pension plans (the “Investment Committee”) has
adopted (and revises from time to time) an investment policy for the U.S. pension plans with the objective of
meeting or exceeding, over time, the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets assumption, weighed
against a reasonable risk level. In connection with this objective, the Investment Committee retains
professional investment managers that invest plan assets in the following asset classes: equity and fixed
income securities, real estate, and cash and other investments, which may include hedge funds and private
equity and global balanced strategies. The International plans follow a similar methodology in conjunction
with local actuarial consultants and asset managers.

The U.S. and international pension plans currently have the following target ranges for these asset
classes, which target ranges are intended to be flexible guidelines for allocating the plans’ assets amongst
various classes of assets, and are reviewed periodically and considered for readjustment when an asset class
weighting is outside of its target range (recognizing that these are flexible target ranges that may vary from
time to time) with the objective of achieving the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets
assumption, weighed against a reasonable risk level, as follows:

Target Ranges

U.S. Plans

International Plans

Asset Category:

Equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33% - 39%
Fixed income securities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20% - 26%
0% - 3%
Real estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash and other investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
13% - 19%
Global balanced strategies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22% - 28%

38% - 46%
54% - 62%
—
0% - 4%
—

The U.S. and international pension plans weighted-average actual asset allocations at December 31,

2008 and 2007, respectively, by asset categories were as follows:

U.S. Plans

International
Plans

2008

2007

2008

2007

Asset Category:

Equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fixed income securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash and other investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Global balanced strategies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

30.5% 38.1% 42.4% 50.3%
24.4
22.0
23.1

19.6
17.9
24.4

49.3
0.4
—

57.4
0.2
—

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Within the equity securities asset class, the investment policy provides for investments in a broad range
of publicly-traded securities ranging from domestic and international stocks and small to large capitali-
zation stocks. Within the fixed income securities asset class, the investment policy provides for investments
in a broad range of publicly-traded debt securities ranging from domestic and international Treasury issues,
corporate debt securities, mortgages and asset-backed issues. Within the real estate asset class, the
investment policy provides for investment in a diversified commingled pool of real estate properties
across the U.S. In the cash and other investments asset class, investments may be in cash and cash
equivalents and other investments, which may include hedge funds and private equity not covered in the
classes listed above, provided that such investments are approved by the Investment Committee prior to
their selection. Within the global balanced strategies, the investment policy provides for investments in a
broad range of publicly traded stocks and bonds in both domestic and international markets as described in
the asset classes listed above. In addition, the global balanced strategies can include commodities, provided
that such investments are approved by the Investment Committee prior to their selection.

F-47

The Investment Committee’s investment policy does not allow the use of derivatives for speculative
purposes, but such policy does allow its investment managers to use derivatives for the purpose of reducing
risk exposures or to replicate exposures of a particular asset class.

Contributions:

The Company’s policy is to fund at least the minimum contributions required to meet applicable
federal employee benefit and local laws, or to directly pay benefit payments where appropriate. During
2008, the Company contributed $11.8 million to its pension plans and $1.0 million to its other post-
retirement benefit plans. During 2009, the Company expects to contribute approximately $26 million to its
pension plans and approximately $1 million to its other post-retirement benefit plans.

Estimated Future Benefit Payments:

The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are expected to

be paid:

2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Years 2014 to 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total
Pension
Benefits

$ 36.6
37.1
38.2
39.8
41.2
220.1

Total
Other
Benefits

$1.0
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.2
6.1

13. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

The following note gives effect to Revlon, Inc.’s September 2008 1-for-10 Reverse Stock Split.

Information about the Company’s common and treasury stock issued and/or outstanding is as follows:

Common Stock

Class A

Class B

Treasury
Stock

Balance, January 1, 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stock issuances in $110 Million Rights Offering . . . . . . . . . .
Exercise of stock options for common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Restricted stock grants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cancellation of restricted stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Withholding of restricted stock to satisfy taxes . . . . . . . . . . .

Balance, December 31, 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stock issuances in $100 Million Rights Offering . . . . . . . . . .
Restricted stock grants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cancellation of restricted stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Withholding of restricted stock to satisfy taxes . . . . . . . . . . .

Balance, December 31, 2007 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stock issuances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Restricted stock grants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cancellation of restricted stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Repurchase of restricted stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

34,447,274
3,928,571
6,040
651,167
(32,937)
—

39,000,115
9,523,809
831,352
(62,936)
—

49,292,340
—
939,925
(81,910)
—

3,125,000
—
—
—
—
—

3,125,000
—
—
—
—

3,125,000
—
—
—
—

Balance, December 31, 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

50,150,355

3,125,000

23,631
—
—
—
—
19,335

42,966
—
—
—
87,613

130,579
—
—
—
125,874

256,453

F-48

Common Stock

As of December 31, 2008, the Company’s authorized common stock consisted of 900 million shares of
Class A Common Stock and 200 million shares of Class B common stock, par value $0.01 per share
(“Class B Common Stock” and together with the Class A Common Stock, the “Common Stock”). The
holders of Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock vote as a single class on all matters, except as
otherwise required by law, with each share of Class A Common Stock entitling its holder to one vote and
each share of the Class B Common Stock entitling its holder to ten votes. All of the shares of Class B
Common Stock are owned by REV Holdings LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of MacAndrews & Forbes.
The holders of the Company’s two classes of Common Stock are entitled to share equally in the earnings of
the Company from dividends, when and if declared by Revlon, Inc.’s Board of Directors. Each outstanding
share of Class B Common Stock is convertible into one share of Class A Common Stock.

In September 2008, Revlon, Inc. effected a 1-for-10 reverse stock split of Revlon, Inc.’s Class A and
Class B common stock (the “Reverse Stock Split”). As a result of the Reverse Stock Split, each ten shares of
Revlon, Inc.’s Class A and Class B common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to 11:59 p.m. on
September 15, 2008 were automatically combined into one share of Class A common stock and Class B
common stock, respectively.

In completing the $110 Million Rights Offering in March 2006, Revlon, Inc. issued an additional
3,928,571 shares of its Class A Common Stock, including 1,588,566 shares subscribed for by public
shareholders (other than MacAndrews & Forbes) and 2,340,005 shares issued to MacAndrews & Forbes
in a private placement directly from Revlon, Inc.

In completing the $100 Million Rights Offering in January 2007, Revlon, Inc. issued an additional
9,523,809 shares of its Class A Common Stock, including 3,784,747 shares subscribed for by public
shareholders (other than MacAndrews & Forbes) and 5,739,062 shares issued to MacAndrews & Forbes
in a private placement directly from Revlon, Inc.

As of December 31, 2008, MacAndrews & Forbes beneficially owned approximately 58% of Revlon,
Inc.’s Class A Common Stock, 100% of Revlon, Inc.’s Class B Common Stock, together representing
approximately 61% of Revlon, Inc.’s outstanding shares of Common Stock and approximately 75% of the
combined voting power of the outstanding shares of Revlon Inc.’s Common Stock. As filed by Fidelity with
the SEC on February 17, 2009 and reporting, as of December 31, 2008, on a Schedule 13G/A, Fidelity held
approximately 7.7 million shares of Class A Common Stock, representing approximately 15.9% of Revlon,
Inc.’s outstanding shares of Class A Common Stock, approximately 14.9% of the outstanding shares of
Common Stock and approximately 9.6% of the combined voting power of the Common Stock.

Treasury stock

Pursuant to the share withholding provisions of the Stock Plan, during 2008, certain employees and
executives, in lieu of paying withholding taxes on the vesting of certain shares of restricted stock, authorized
the withholding of an aggregate 125,874 shares of Revlon, Inc. Class A Common Stock to satisfy their
minimum statutory tax withholding requirements related to such vesting events. These shares were
recorded as treasury stock using the cost method, at $11.70, $9.40, $8.00 and $8.27 per share, respectively,
the NYSE closing price per share on the applicable vesting dates (as adjusted for Revlon, Inc.’s September
2008 1-for-10 Reverse Stock Split), for a total of approximately $1.1 million.

Pursuant to the share withholding provisions of the Stock Plan, during 2007, certain employees and
executives, in lieu of paying withholding taxes on the vesting of certain restricted stock, authorized the
withholding of an aggregate of 87,613 shares of Revlon, Inc. Class A Common Stock to satisfy their
minimum statutory tax withholding requirements related to such vesting events. These shares were
recorded as treasury stock using the cost method, at $12.00, $13.80 and $10.80 per share, respectively,
the NYSE closing price per share on the applicable vesting dates (as adjusted for Revlon, Inc.’s September
2008 1-for-10 Reverse Stock Split), for a total of approximately $1.1 million.

F-49

Pursuant to the share withholding provisions of the Stock Plan, during 2006, certain executives, in lieu
of paying withholding taxes on the vesting of certain restricted stock, authorized the withholding of an
aggregate of 19,335 shares of Revlon, Inc. Class A Common Stock to satisfy their minimum statutory tax
withholding requirements related to such vesting events. These shares were recorded as treasury stock using
the cost method, at $35.60, $31.60 and $12.80 per share, respectively, the NYSE closing price per share on
the applicable vesting dates (as adjusted for Revlon, Inc.’s September 2008 1-for-10 Reverse Stock Split), for
a total of approximately $0.6 million.

14. STOCK COMPENSATION PLAN

The following note gives effect to Revlon, Inc.’s September 2008 1-for-10 Reverse Stock Split. See

Note 13, “Stockholders’ Equity”.

Revlon, Inc. maintains the Third Amended and Restated Revlon, Inc. Stock Plan (the “Stock Plan”),
which provides for awards of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted or unrestricted stock and
restricted stock units to eligible employees and directors of Revlon, Inc. and its affiliates, including Products
Corporation.

Stock options:

Non-qualified stock options granted under the Stock Plan are granted at prices that equal or exceed the
fair market value of Class A Common Stock on the grant date and have a term of 7 years (option grants
under the Stock Plan prior to June 4, 2004 have a term of 10 years). Option grants generally vest over service
periods that range from one to four years. Additionally, employee stock option grants outstanding in
November 2006 vest upon a “change in control”.

Total net stock option compensation expense includes amounts attributable to the granting of, and the
remaining requisite service period of, stock options issued under the Stock Plan, which awards were
unvested at January 1, 2006 or granted on or after such date. Net stock option compensation expense for the
year ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 was $0.3 million, $1.5 million and $7.1 million (including with
respect to 2006 $1.4 million related to the departure of Mr. Jack Stahl, the Company’s former President and
Chief Executive Officer, in September 2006), or $0.01, $0.03 and $0.17, respectively, for both basic and
diluted earnings per share. As of December 31, 2008, the total unrecognized stock option compensation
expense related to unvested stock options in the aggregate was $0.2 million. The unrecognized stock option
compensation expense is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 0.2 years as of
December 31, 2008. The total fair value of stock options that vested during the year ended December 31,
2008 was $1.0 million.

At December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 there were 1,336,871; 2,012,645; and 1,799,045 stock options

exercisable under the Stock Plan, respectively.

F-50

A summary of the status of stock option grants under the Stock Plan as of December 31, 2008, 2007 and

2006 and changes during the years then ended is presented below:

Outstanding at January 1, 2006. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exercised. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Forfeited and expired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Outstanding at December 31, 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exercised. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Forfeited and expired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Outstanding at December 31, 2007 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exercised. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Forfeited and expired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Outstanding at December 31, 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Shares
(000’s)

3,303.3
4.7
(6.0)
(802.7)

2,499.3
—
—
(331.2)

2,168.1
—
—
(762.6)

1,405.5

Weighted
Average
Exercise Price

$42.47
19.47
28.99
33.42

45.43
—
—
69.00

41.94
—
—
51.60

36.76

There were no stock options granted during 2008 and 2007. The weighted average grant date fair value
of stock options granted during 2006 was $1.11 per option, which was estimated using the Black-Scholes
option valuation model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

Year Ended December 31,

2008

2007

2006

Expected life of option(a)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Risk-free interest rate(b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expected volatility(c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expected dividend yield(d). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

N/A

N/A
N/A% N/A%
N/A% N/A%
N/A

N/A

4.75 years
4.76%
65%
N/A

(a) The expected life of an option is calculated using a formula based on the vesting term and contractual life of the option.

(b) The risk-free interest rate is based upon the rate in effect at the time of the option grant on a zero coupon U.S. Treasury bill for

periods approximating the expected life of the option.

(c) Expected volatility is based on the daily historical volatility of the closing price of Revlon, Inc.’s Class A Common Stock as

reported on the NYSE consolidated tape over the expected life of the option.

(d) Assumes no dividends on Revlon, Inc.’s Class A Common Stock for stock options granted during the years ended December 31,

2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

F-51

The following table summarizes information about the Stock Plan’s stock options outstanding at

December 31, 2008:

Outstanding

Range of
Exercise Prices

Number of
Options
(000’s)

Weighted
Average
Years
Remaining

$14.60 to $25.50 . . . . .
25.51 to 34.70 . . . . .
34.71 to 56.40 . . . . .
56.41 to 100.00 . . . . .
100.01 to 500.00 . . . . .

276.5
868.3
123.3
95.7
41.7

14.60 to 500.00 . . . . .

1,405.5

3.50
2.40
3.67
1.85
0.16

2.63

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

$ 25.24
30.35
39.49
69.24
164.15

36.76

Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value

Number of
Options
(000’s)

Exerciseable
Weighted
Average
Years
Remaining

—
—
—
—
—

—

209.0
867.2
123.3
95.7
41.7

1,336.9

3.50
2.40
3.67
1.85
0.16

2.58

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

$ 25.24
30.35
39.49
69.24
164.15

37.34

Restricted stock awards and restricted stock units:

The Stock Plan and the Supplemental Stock Plan (as hereinafter defined) also allow for awards of
restricted stock and restricted stock units to employees and directors of Revlon, Inc. and its affiliates,
including Products Corporation. The restricted stock awards granted under the Stock Plan vest over service
periods that generally range from 1.5 years to 3 years. In 2008, 2007 and 2006, the Company granted 939,925;
831,352; and 651,167 shares, respectively, of restricted stock and restricted stock units under the Stock Plan
with weighted average fair values, based on the market price of Class A Common Stock on the dates of
grant, of $7.22, $12.50 and $15.87, respectively. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, there were 1,643,739 and
1,164,806 shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units outstanding and unvested under the Stock
Plan, respectively.

A summary of the status of grants of restricted stock and restricted stock units under the Stock Plan as

of December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 and changes during the years then ended is presented below:

Outstanding at January 1, 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Vested(a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Outstanding at December 31, 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Vested(a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Outstanding at December 31, 2007 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Vested (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Outstanding at December 31, 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Shares
(000’s)

381.0
651.2
(187.2)
(32.9)

812.1
831.3
(415.4)
(63.2)

1,164.8
939.9
(379.4)
(81.6)

1,643.7

Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value

$31.86
15.87
31.33
30.15

19.23
12.50
22.46
15.74

13.45
7.22
14.47
13.46

9.65

(a) Of the amounts vested during 2006, 2007 and 2008, 19,335 shares; 87,613 shares; and 125,874 shares, respectively,
were withheld by the Company to satisfy certain grantees’ minimum withholding tax requirements, which
withheld shares became Revlon, Inc. treasury stock and are not sold on the open market. (See discussion under
“Treasury Stock” in Note 13, “Stockholders’ Equity”).

F-52

In 2002, Revlon, Inc. adopted the Revlon, Inc. 2002 Supplemental Stock Plan (the “Supplemental
Stock Plan”), the purpose of which was to provide Mr. Jack Stahl, the Company’s former President and
Chief Executive Officer, the sole eligible participant under the Supplemental Stock Plan, with inducement
awards to entice him to join the Company. All of the 53,000 shares of Class A Common Stock covered by the
Supplemental Stock Plan (as adjusted for Revlon, Inc.’s September 2008 1-for-10 Reverse Stock Split — See
Note 13,“Stockholders’ Equity”) were issued in the form of restricted shares to Mr. Stahl in February 2002
and all of these shares were fully vested at December 31, 2007.

The Company recognizes non-cash compensation expense related to restricted stock awards and
restricted stock units under the Stock Plan and Supplemental Stock Plan using the straight-line method over
the remaining service period. The Company recorded compensation expense related to restricted stock
awards under the Stock Plan and Supplemental Stock Plan of $6.5 million, $5.2 million and $6.0 million
during 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The deferred stock-based compensation related to restricted stock
awards is $13.0 million and $14.1 million at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The deferred stock-
based compensation related to restricted stock awards is expected to be recognized over a weighted-
average period of 2.3 years. The total fair value of restricted stock and restricted stock units that vested
during the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 was $5.5 million and $9.3 million, respectively. At
December 31, 2008, there were 1,643,739 shares of unvested restricted stock and restricted stock units under
the Stock Plan and nil under the Supplemental Stock Plan.

F-53

15. ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss during 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively,

are as follows:

Balance January 1, 2006 . . . . . . . .
Unrealized gains (losses) . . . . . . .
Reclassifications under

SFAS No. 158(a) . . . . . . . . . . . .

Portion of SFAS No. 158

reclassification allocated to
Revlon Holdings(a) . . . . . . . . . .
Reclassifications into net loss. . . .

Balance December 31, 2006. . . . .
SFAS No. 158 adjustment(b) . . . . .

Adjusted balance

January 1, 2007 . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unrealized losses . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Reclassifications into net loss(c) . .
Unrealized gains under

SFAS No. 158(d) . . . . . . . . . . . .

Balance December 31, 2007. . . . .
Unrealized losses . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Reclassifications into net loss(e) . .
Elimination of currency

translation adjustments related
to Bozzano Sale Transaction . .

Unrealized losses under

SFAS No. 158 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Foreign
Currency
Translation

Minimum
Pension
Liability

Actuarial
Gain/(Loss)
on Post-
retirement
Benefits

Prior Service
Cost
on Post-
retirement
Benefits

$(14.4)
3.2

$(107.0)
19.0

$ —
—

$ —
—

Deferred
Loss -
Hedging

$(0.3)
(0.4)

Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss

$(121.7)
21.8

—

—
—

(11.2)

(11.2)
(2.0)

(13.2)
(8.2)

37.3

88.0

(115.8)

2.7

—

(25.1)

—
—

—

0.5
—

(115.3)
10.3

—
—

2.7

—

(105.0)

2.7

30.1

(74.9)

(1.2)

1.5

—

(119.5)

(0.7)

—
0.3

(0.4)

(0.4)
(1.7)
—

(2.1)
(5.3)
2.0

0.5
0.3

(124.2)
10.3

(113.9)
(3.7)
—

28.9

(88.7)
(13.5)
2.0

37.3

(120.2)

Balance December 31, 2008. . . . .

$ 15.9

$ — $(194.4)

$ 0.8

$(5.4)

$(183.1)

(a) Due to the adoption of SFAS No. 158 in December 2006, the minimum pension liability, as set forth in the table above, is no
longer recognized as a component of comprehensive loss. The $24.6 million net adjustment represents the difference between
(1) $115.8 million of actuarial gains and $2.7 million of prior service costs calculated under SFAS No. 158, both of which have not
yet been recognized as a component of net periodic pension cost, (2) the net $0.5 million reclassification of actuarial gains and
prior service costs calculated under SFAS No. 158, which are attributable to Revlon Holdings under the 1992 transfer
agreements referred to in Note 16, “Related Party Transactions”, and (3) the $88.0 million reversal of the minimum pension
liability, which under SFAS No. 158 is no longer required as a component of comprehensive loss to be recognized during 2006 as
a component of comprehensive loss. (See Note 12, “Savings Plan, Pension and Other Post-retirement Benefits”).

(b) Due to the Company’s early adoption of the provisions under SFAS No. 158, effective as of January 1, 2007 requiring a
measurement date for determining defined benefit plan assets and obligations using the Company’s fiscal year end of
December 31st, rather than using a September 30th measurement date, the Company recognized a net reduction to the
beginning balance of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss of $10.3 million, as set forth in the table above, which is
comprised of (1) a $9.4 million reduction to Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss due to the revaluation of the pension
liability as a result of the change in the measurement date and (2) a $0.9 million reduction to Accumulated Other Compre-
hensive Loss of amortization of prior service costs, actuarial gains/losses and return on assets over the period from October 1,
2006 to December 31, 2006. In addition, the Company recognized a $2.9 million increase to the beginning balance of
Accumulated Deficit, as set forth in the table above, which represents the total net periodic benefit costs incurred from
October 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006. (See Note 12, “Savings Plan, Pension, and Post-retirement Benefits”).

F-54

(c) Due to the Company’s use of derivative financial instruments, the net amount of hedge accounting derivative losses recognized
by the Company, as set forth in the table above, pertains to (1) the reversal of $0.4 million of net losses accumulated in
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss at January 1, 2007 upon the Company’s election during the fiscal quarter ended
March 31, 2007 to discontinue the application of hedge accounting under SFAS No. 133,“Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities” for certain derivative financial instruments, as the Company no longer designates its foreign currency
forward exchange contracts as hedging instruments and (2) the reversal of a $0.4 million gain pertaining a net receipt settlement
in December 2007 under the terms of Products Corporation’s 2007 Interest Rate Swap. The Company has designated the 2007
Interest Rate Swap as a hedging instrument and accordingly applies hedge accounting under SFAS No. 133. (See Note 10,
“Financial Instruments” to the Consolidated Financial Statements and the discussion of Critical Accounting Policies in this
Form 10-K).

(d) Amount represents a reduction in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss as a result of the amortization of unrecognized prior
service costs and actuarial gains/losses arising during 2007 related to the Company’s pension and other post-retirement plans.

(e) Amount represents the reversal of amounts recorded in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) pertaining to net

settlement receipts of $0.2 million and net settlement payments of $2.2 million on the 2007 and 2008 Interest Rate Swaps.

16. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

As of December 31, 2008, MacAndrews & Forbes beneficially owned shares of Revlon, Inc.’s Common
Stock having approximately 75% of the combined voting power of such outstanding shares. As a result,
MacAndrews & Forbes is able to elect Revlon, Inc.’s entire Board of Directors and control the vote on all
matters submitted to a vote of Revlon, Inc.’s stockholders. MacAndrews & Forbes is wholly-owned by
Ronald O. Perelman, Chairman of Revlon, Inc.’s Board of Directors.

Transfer Agreements

In June 1992, Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation entered into an asset transfer agreement with
Revlon Holdings LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and formerly a Delaware corporation known
as Revlon Holdings Inc. (“Revlon Holdings”), and which is an affiliate and an indirect wholly-owned
subsidiary of MacAndrews & Forbes and certain of Revlon Holdings’ wholly-owned subsidiaries. Revlon,
Inc. and Products Corporation also entered into a real property asset transfer agreement with Revlon
Holdings. Pursuant to such agreements, on June 24, 1992 Revlon Holdings transferred assets to Products
Corporation and Products Corporation assumed all of the liabilities of Revlon Holdings, other than certain
specifically excluded assets and liabilities (the liabilities excluded are referred to as the “Excluded
Liabilities”). Certain consumer products lines sold in demonstrator-assisted distribution channels consid-
ered not integral to Revlon, Inc.’s business and that historically had not been profitable and certain other
assets and liabilities were retained by Revlon Holdings. Revlon Holdings agreed to indemnify Revlon, Inc.
and Products Corporation against losses arising from the Excluded Liabilities, and Revlon, Inc. and
Products Corporation agreed to indemnify Revlon Holdings against losses arising from the liabilities
assumed by Products Corporation. The amounts reimbursed by Revlon Holdings to Products Corporation
for the Excluded Liabilities for 2008, 2007 and 2006 were $0.3 million, $0.1 million and $0.3 million,
respectively.

Reimbursement Agreements

Revlon, Inc., Products Corporation and MacAndrews & Forbes Inc. (a wholly-owned subsidiary of
MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings) have entered into reimbursement agreements (the “Reimbursement
Agreements”) pursuant to which (i) MacAndrews & Forbes Inc. is obligated to provide (directly or through
affiliates) certain professional and administrative services, including employees, to Revlon, Inc. and its
subsidiaries, including Products Corporation, and purchase services from third party providers, such as
insurance, legal and accounting services and air transportation services, on behalf of Revlon, Inc. and its
subsidiaries, including Products Corporation, to the extent requested by Products Corporation, and
(ii) Products Corporation is obligated to provide certain professional and administrative services, including
employees, to MacAndrews & Forbes and purchase services from third party providers, such as insurance,
legal and accounting services, on behalf of MacAndrews & Forbes to the extent requested by MacAn-
drews & Forbes, provided that in each case the performance of such services does not cause an unrea-
sonable burden to MacAndrews & Forbes or Products Corporation, as the case may be.

F-55

Products Corporation reimburses MacAndrews & Forbes for the allocable costs of the services
purchased for or provided to Products Corporation and its subsidiaries and for the reasonable out-of-
pocket expenses incurred in connection with the provision of such services. MacAndrews & Forbes
reimburses Products Corporation for the allocable costs of the services purchased for or provided to
MacAndrews & Forbes and for the reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with the
purchase or provision of such services. Each of Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation, on the one hand, and
MacAndrews & Forbes Inc., on the other, has agreed to indemnify the other party for losses arising out of
the provision of services by it under the Reimbursement Agreements, other than losses resulting from its
willful misconduct or gross negligence.

The Reimbursement Agreements may be terminated by either party on 90 days’ notice. Products
Corporation does not intend to request services under the Reimbursement Agreements unless their costs
would be at least as favorable to Products Corporation as could be obtained from unaffiliated third parties.

Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation participate in MacAndrews & Forbes’ directors and officers
liability insurance program, which covers Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation, as well as MacAndrews &
Forbes. The limits of coverage are available on an aggregate basis for losses to any or all of the participating
companies and their respective directors and officers. Revlon, Inc. and Products Corporation reimburse
MacAndrews & Forbes from time to time for their allocable portion of the premiums for such coverage or
they pay the insurers directly, which premiums the Company believes are more favorable than the
premiums the Company would pay were it to secure stand-alone coverage. Any amounts paid by Revlon,
Inc. and Products Corporation directly to MacAndrews & Forbes in respect of premiums are included in the
amounts paid under the Reimbursement Agreements. The net amounts (payable to) reimbursable from
MacAndrews & Forbes to Products Corporation for the services provided under the Reimbursement
Agreements for 2008, 2007 and 2006 were $(1.4) million, $0.6 million, and $0.5 million, respectively,
primarily for 2008, in respect of reimbursements for insurance premiums.

Tax Sharing Agreements

As a result of the closing of the Revlon Exchange Transactions, as of March 25, 2004, Revlon, Inc.,
Products Corporation and their U.S. subsidiaries were no longer included in the MacAndrews & Forbes
Group for federal income tax purposes. See Note 11, “Income Taxes”, for further discussion on these
agreements and related transactions in 2008, 2007 and 2006.

Registration Rights Agreement

Prior to the consummation of Revlon, Inc.’s initial public equity offering in February 1996, Revlon, Inc.
and Revlon Worldwide Corporation (which subsequently merged into REV Holdings), the then direct
parent of Revlon, Inc., entered into a registration rights agreement (the “Registration Rights Agreement”),
and in February 2003, MacAndrews & Forbes executed a joinder agreement to the Registration Rights
Agreement, pursuant to which REV Holdings, MacAndrews & Forbes and certain transferees of Revlon,
Inc.’s Common Stock held by REV Holdings (the “Holders”) had the right to require Revlon, Inc. to
register under the Securities Act all or part of the Class A Common Stock owned by such Holders, including
shares of Class A Common Stock purchased by MacAndrews & Forbes in connection with the $50.0 million
equity rights offering consummated by Revlon, Inc. in 2003 and shares of Class A Common Stock issuable
upon conversion of Revlon, Inc.’s Class B Common Stock owned by such Holders (a “Demand Regis-
tration”). In connection with the closing of the Revlon Exchange Transactions and pursuant to the 2004
Investment Agreement, MacAndrews & Forbes executed a joinder agreement that provided that Mac-
Andrews & Forbes would also be a Holder under the Registration Rights Agreement and that all shares
acquired by MacAndrews & Forbes pursuant to the 2004 Investment Agreement are deemed to be
registrable securities under the Registration Rights Agreement. This included all of the shares of Class A
Common Stock acquired by MacAndrews & Forbes in connection with the $110 Million Rights Offering
and the $100 Million Rights Offering.

F-56

Revlon, Inc. may postpone giving effect to a Demand Registration for a period of up to 30 days if
Revlon, Inc. believes such registration might have a material adverse effect on any plan or proposal by
Revlon, Inc. with respect to any financing, acquisition, recapitalization, reorganization or other material
transaction, or if Revlon, Inc. is in possession of material non-public information that, if publicly disclosed,
could result in a material disruption of a major corporate development or transaction then pending or in
progress or in other material adverse consequences to Revlon, Inc. In addition, the Holders have the right to
participate in registrations by Revlon, Inc. of its Class A Common Stock (a “Piggyback Registration”). The
Holders will pay all out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with any Demand Registration. Revlon,
Inc. will pay any expenses incurred in connection with a Piggyback Registration, except for underwriting
discounts, commissions and expenses attributable to the shares of Class A Common Stock sold by such
Holders.

MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan and the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews &
Forbes Line of Credit

For a description of transactions with MacAndrews & Forbes in 2008, 2007 and 2006 in connection with
the MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term Loan and the 2004 Consolidated MacAndrews &
Forbes Line of Credit with MacAndrews & Forbes, see Note 9, “Long-Term Debt”.

Refinancing Transactions and Rights Offerings

For a description of transactions with MacAndrews & Forbes in 2008, 2007 and 2006 in connection with
the Debt Reduction Transactions, the Revlon Exchange Transactions and the 2004 Investment Agreement,
including in connection with the $110 Million Rights Offering and the $100 Million Rights Offering, as well
as the full repayment of the balance of Products Corporation’s 85⁄8% Senior Subordinated Notes on their
February 1, 2008 maturity date using the proceeds of the MacAndrews & Forbes Senior Subordinated Term
Loan and a related letter agreement between Revlon, Inc. and MacAndrews & Forbes, see Note 9,“Long-
Term Debt”.

Other

Pursuant to a lease dated April 2, 1993 (the “Edison Lease”), Revlon Holdings leased to Products
Corporation the Edison, N.J. research and development facility for a term of up to 10 years with an annual
rent of $1.4 million and certain shared operating expenses payable by Products Corporation which, together
with the annual rent, were not to exceed $2.0 million per year. In August 1998, Revlon Holdings sold the
Edison facility to an unrelated third party, which assumed substantially all liability for environmental claims
and compliance costs relating to the Edison facility, and in connection with the sale Products Corporation
terminated the Edison Lease and entered into a new lease with the new owner. Revlon Holdings agreed to
indemnify Products Corporation through September 1, 2013 (the term of the new lease) to the extent that
rent under the new lease exceeds the rent that would have been payable under the terminated Edison Lease
had it not been terminated. The net amounts reimbursed by Revlon Holdings to Products Corporation with
respect to the Edison facility for 2008, 2007 and 2006 were $0.4 million, $0.3 million and $0.3 million,
respectively.

Certain of Products Corporation’s debt obligations, including the 2006 Credit Agreements, have been,
and may in the future be, supported by, among other things, guaranties from Revlon, Inc. and, subject to
certain limited exceptions, all of the domestic subsidiaries of Products Corporation. The obligations under
such guaranties are and were secured by, among other things, the capital stock of Products Corporation and,
subject to certain limited exceptions, the capital stock of all of Products Corporation’s domestic subsidiaries
and 66% of the capital stock of Products Corporation’s and its domestic subsidiaries’ first-tier foreign
subsidiaries.

Pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr. Jack Stahl, the Company’s former President and Chief
Executive Officer, received two loans (prior to the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) from
Products Corporation, one, in March 2002, to satisfy state, local and federal income taxes (including

F-57

withholding taxes) incurred by him as a result of his having made an election under Section 83(b) of the
Code in connection with the 100,000 shares of restricted stock (as adjusted for Revlon, Inc.’s September
2008 1-for-10 Reverse Stock Split — See Note 13, “Stockholders’ Equity”) that were granted to him in
connection with his joining the Company, and a second in May 2002 to cover the purchase of a principal
residence in the New York metropolitan area, as he was relocating from Atlanta, Georgia. As a result of the
termination of his employment in September 2006, the outstanding principal amount and all accrued
interest on such loans was forgiven in accordance with the terms of his employment agreement, being
approximately $2.2 million (which included accrued interest) and $1.9 million, respectively.

During 2008, 2007 and 2006, Products Corporation paid $0.4 million, $0.7 million and $0.9 million,
respectively, to a nationally-recognized security services company, in which MacAndrews & Forbes had a
controlling interest, for security officer services. Products Corporation’s decision to engage such firm was
based upon its expertise in the field of security services, and the rates were competitive with industry rates
for similarly situated security firms. Effective in August 2008, MacAndrews & Forbes disposed of its interest
in such security services company and accordingly from and after such date is no longer a related party.

Fidelity Management Trust Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of FMR LLC (which, as of the
December 31, 2008, beneficially owned more than 5% of the Company’s Class A Common Stock), acts as
trustee of the 401(k) Plan. During 2007 and 2006, the Company paid Fidelity Management Trust Company
approximately $0.1 million and $0.1 million to administer the $100 Million Rights Offering and the $110
Million Rights Offering with respect to 401(k) Plan participants and to administer the Company’s 401(k)
Plan. The fees for such services were based on standard rates charged by Fidelity Management Trust Com-
pany for similar services and are not material to the Company or FMR LLC.

17. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Products Corporation currently leases manufacturing, executive, research and development, and sales
facilities and various types of equipment under operating and capital lease agreements. Rental expense was
$15.3 million, $18.2 million and $19.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. Minimum rental commitments under all noncancelable leases, including those pertaining to
idled facilities, with remaining lease terms in excess of one year from December 31, 2008 aggregated
$83.3 million. Such commitments for each of the five years and thereafter subsequent to December 31, 2008
are $17.6 million, $14.7 million, $13.3 million, $11.9 million, $10.4 million and $15.4 million, respectively.

The Company is involved in various routine legal proceedings incident to the ordinary course of its
business. The Company believes that the outcome of all pending legal proceedings in the aggregate is
unlikely to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations and/or its
consolidated financial condition.

F-58

18. QUARTERLY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)

The following note gives effect to Revlon, Inc.’s September 2008 1-for-10 Reverse Stock Split. See

Note 13, “Stockholders’ Equity”.

The following is a summary of the unaudited quarterly results of operations:

Year Ended December 31, 2008

Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Loss) income from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income from discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net (loss) income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Basic (loss) income per common share:

1st
Quarter

$311.7
198.7
(2.7)
0.2
(2.5)

2nd
Quarter

$366.5
241.9
19.8
0.1
19.9

Continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(0.05)
0.00

0.39
0.00

3rd
Quarter

$334.4
207.6
(15.2)
44.4
29.2

(0.30)
0.87

4th
Quarter

$334.2
207.7
11.2
0.1
11.3

0.22
0.00

Net (loss) income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ (0.05)

$ 0.39

$ 0.57

$ 0.22

Diluted (loss) income per common share:

Continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(0.05)
0.00

0.39
0.00

(0.30)
0.86

0.22
0.00

Net (loss) income per common share. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ (0.05)

$ 0.39

$ 0.57

$ 0.22

Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Loss) income from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Loss) income from discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net (loss) income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Basic loss per common share:

Year Ended December 31, 2007

1st
Quarter

$322.0
199.3
(35.0)
(0.2)
(35.2)

2nd
Quarter

$341.0
217.5
(11.9)
0.6
(11.3)

3rd
Quarter

$330.8
211.1
(12.1)
1.7
(10.4)

4th
Quarter

$373.3
233.5
40.0
0.8
40.8

Continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(0.72)
(0.00)

(0.23)
0.01

(0.24)
0.03

0.78
0.02

Net loss per common share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ (0.72)

$ (0.22)

$ (0.20)

$ 0.80

Diluted loss per common share:

Continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(0.72)
(0.00)

(0.23)
0.01

(0.24)
0.03

0.78
0.02

Net loss per common share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ (0.72)

$ (0.22)

$ (0.20)

$ 0.80

19. GEOGRAPHIC, FINANCIAL AND OTHER INFORMATION

The Company manages its business on the basis of one reportable operating segment. See Note 1,
“Summary of Significant Accounting Policies”, for a brief description of the Company’s business. As of
December 31, 2008, the Company had operations established in 14 countries outside of the U.S. and its
products are sold throughout the world. Generally, net sales by geographic area are presented by attributing
revenues from external customers on the basis of where the products are sold. During 2008, 2007 and 2006,
Wal-Mart and its affiliates worldwide accounted for approximately 23%, 24% and 23%, respectively, of the
Company’s net sales. The Company expects that Wal-Mart and a small number of other customers will, in
the aggregate, continue to account for a large portion of the Company’s net sales. As is customary in the

F-59

consumer products industry, none of the Company’s customers is under an obligation to continue
purchasing products from the Company in the future.

In the tables below, certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current

period’s presentation.

Geographic area:

Net sales:

United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
International . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Long-lived assets — net:

United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
International

Classes of similar products:

Net sales:

Color cosmetics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Beauty care and fragrance . . . . . . . . . . . .

Year Ended December 31,

2008

2007

2006

$ 782.6
564.2

$1,346.8

2008

$308.1
76.6

$ 384.7

58% $ 804.2
42%
562.9

59% $ 764.9
41%
533.8

59%
41%

$1,367.1

$1,298.7

December 31,
2007

2006

80% $332.3
20%
81.0

80% $362.1
20%
77.1

82%
18%

$ 413.3

$ 439.2

Year Ended December 31,

2008

2007

2006

$ 831.0
515.8

$1,346.8

62% $ 792.1
38%
575.0

58% $ 788.4
42%
510.3

61%
39%

$1,367.1

$1,298.7

F-60

REVLON, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
Years Ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
(dollars in millions)

Schedule II

Balance at
Beginning
Year

Charged to
Cost and
Expenses

Other
Deductions

Balance at
End of
Year

Year ended December 31, 2008:
Applied against asset accounts:

Allowance for doubtful accounts . . . . . . . . . . . .
Allowance for volume and early payment

$ 3.5

discounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$15.2

$ 0.4

$56.0

$ (0.6)(1)

$ 3.3

$(57.7)(2)

$13.5

discounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$13.7

$52.1

$(50.6)(2)

$15.2

$ 3.5

$ (0.4)

$ 0.4(1)

$ 3.5

Year ended December 31, 2007:
Applied against asset accounts:

Allowance for doubtful accounts . . . . . . . . . . . .
Allowance for volume and early payment

Year ended December 31, 2006:
Applied against asset accounts:

Allowance for doubtful accounts . . . . . . . . . . . .
Allowance for volume and early payment

discounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$13.8

$52.1

$(52.2)(2)

$13.7

$ 4.8

$ (1.9)

$ 0.6(1)

$ 3.5

(1) Doubtful accounts written off, less recoveries, reclassifications and foreign currency translation adjustments.

(2) Discounts taken, reclassifications and foreign currency translation adjustments.

F-61

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant
has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

SIGNATURES

Revlon, Inc.
(Registrant)

By:

/s/ David L. Kennedy

By:

/s/ Alan T. Ennis

By:

/s/ Edward A. Mammone

David L. Kennedy
President,
Chief Executive Officer and
Director

Alan T. Ennis
Executive Vice President
and
Chief Financial Officer

Edward A. Mammone
Senior Vice President,
Corporate Controller and
Chief Accounting Officer

Dated: February 25, 2009

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the
following persons on behalf of the Registrant on February 25, 2009 and in the capacities indicated.

Signature

Title

*
(Ronald O. Perelman)
*
(Barry F. Schwartz)
/s/ David L. Kennedy
David L. Kennedy
*
(Alan S. Bernikow)
*
(Paul J. Bohan)
*
(Meyer Feldberg)
*
(Debra L. Lee)
*
(Tamara Mellon)
*
(Kathi P. Seifert)
*
(Kenneth L. Wolfe)

Chairman of the Board and Director

Director

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

Director

Director

Director

Director

Director

Director

Director

* Robert K. Kretzman, by signing his name hereto, does hereby sign this report on behalf of the directors
of the registrant above whose typed names asterisks appear, pursuant to powers of attorney duly
executed by such directors and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

By: /s/ Robert K. Kretzman

Robert K. Kretzman
Attorney-in-fact

[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

PERFORMANCE GRAPH

The following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return on shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock with that of the
S&P 500 Index, the S&P 500 Household Products Index and the S&P 500 Personal Products Index through December 31, 2008. The
comparison for each of the periods presented below assumes that $100 was invested on December 31, 2003 in shares of the Company’s
Class A Common Stock and the stocks included in the relevant indices, and that all dividends were reinvested. These indices, which reflect
formulas for dividend reinvestment and weighting of individual stocks, do not necessarily reflect returns that could be achieved by individual
investors.

FIVE-YEAR TOTAL STOCKHOLDER RETURN
REVLON, INC. VS. S&P INDICES

$250

$225

$200

$175

$150

$125

$100

$75

$50

$25

e
c
i
r
P
k
c
o
t
S
d
e
x
e
d
n

I

$0
12/31/03

12/31/04

12/31/05

12/31/06

12/31/07

12/31/08

Revlon, Inc. Class A Common Stock

S&P 500 Household Products Index

S&P 500 Personal Products Index

S&P 500 Index

SOURCE: Zacks Investment Research, Inc.

NOTES:

Assumes $100 was invested on 12/31/03 in the Company’s Class A Common Stock, and in each of the S&P 500 Index,
the S&P 500 Household Products Index and the S&P 500 Personal Products Index.

Year-end dates reflect the last trading day for each respective year.
Reflects month-end dividend reinvestment.

Summary
Revlon, Inc. Class A Common Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

S&P 500 Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

S&P 500 Personal Products Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
S&P 500 Household Products Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

12/31/03 12/31/04 12/31/05 12/31/06 12/31/07 12/31/08

$100

$100

$100
$100

$103

$111

$133
$115

$138

$116

$157
$120

$57

$135

$185
$138

$53

$142

$219
$159

$30

$90

$131
$130

 
 
SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION
REVLON, INC.

Common Stock and Related Stockholder Matters

The Company’s Class A Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) under the symbol
“REV.” The following table sets forth the range of high and low closing prices as reported by the NYSE for the Company’s Class A Common
Stock for each quarter in 2008 and 2007 (in each case, adjusted for the Company’s 1-for-10 reverse stock split effected in September 2008).

QUARTER

First
Second
Third
Fourth

2008

2007

High

$11.80
9.90
14.85
13.58

Low

$9.10
8.00
6.90
6.02

High

$14.90
14.60
13.80
12.60

Low

$10.50
10.40
10.30
10.00

As of the close of business on December 31, 2008, there were 671 holders of record of the Company’s Class A Common Stock. The closing
price as reported by the NYSE for the Company’s Class A Common Stock on December 31, 2008 was $6.67 per share.

The Company has not declared a cash dividend on its Class A Common Stock subsequent to the Company’s initial public offering in 1996 and
does not anticipate that any cash dividends will be declared on its Class A Common Stock in the foreseeable future. The timing, amount and
form of dividends, if any, will depend on, among other things, the Company’s results of operations, financial condition, cash requirements and
other factors deemed relevant by the Company’s Board of Directors. The declaration and payment of dividends are subject to the discretion of
the Company’s Board of Directors and are subject to certain limitations under Delaware law, and are also limited by the terms of the
Company’s credit agreements, indenture and certain other debt instruments. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations” and Note 9 (Long-Term Debt) of the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in the Company’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, which was filed with the SEC on February 25, 2009.

Transfer Agent & Registrar

American Stock Transfer & Trust Company
59 Maiden Lane
New York, NY 10038
877-777-0800

Notice of Annual Meeting

The Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be held on June 4, 2009 at 10:00 a.m. at
Revlon, Inc.
237 Park Avenue, 13th Floor
New York, NY 10017

Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm

KPMG LLP
New York, New York

Corporate Address

Revlon, Inc.
237 Park Avenue
New York, New York 10017
212-527-4000

Corporate and Investor Information

The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed with the SEC on February 25, 2009, is available
without charge upon written request to:

Investor Relations
Revlon, Inc.
237 Park Avenue
New York, New York 10017

A printable copy of such report is also available on the Company’s website, www.revloninc.com, as well as the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

Investor Relations and Media Contact

212-527-5230

Consumer Information Center

1-800-4-Revlon (1-800-473-8566)

Visit our Website at

www.revloninc.com

The product and brand names used throughout this report are registered or unregistered trademarks of Revlon Consumer Products
Corporation.

Printed in the U.S.A.
· 2009 Revlon, Inc.

This annual report contains forward-looking statements under the caption “Dear Shareholders” which represent the Company’s expec-
tations, beliefs and estimates as to future events and financial performance, including: (a) our strategy to (1) build and leverage our strong
brands, particularly the Revlon brand (including our belief that innovative, high-quality, consumer-preferred brand offering (including our
focus on launching a strong pipeline of new products each year in every segment of the color cosmetics category, while ensuring that our
established franchises remain relevant and competitive, with our rolling, three-year product portfolio strategy), effective brand commu-
nication, appropriate levels of advertising and promotion and superb execution with our retail partners are key drivers of profitable growth);
(2) improve the execution of our strategies and plans, and provide for continued improvement in our organizational capability; (3) continue to
strengthen our international business; (4) improve our operating profit margins and cash flow; and (5) improve our capital structure; (b) as we
look forward in 2009, while we expect economic conditions and the retail sales environment to remain uncertain around the world, our belief
that we are better positioned than in many years to maximize our business results in light of these conditions, including due to our belief that
we have strong global brands, a highly-capable organization, a sustainable, reduced cost structure and an improved capital structure; (c) our
focus on continuing to execute our strategy and manage our business while maintaining flexibility to adapt to changes in business conditions;
(d) our continuing our intense focus on the key growth drivers of the business (including those referred to in item (a)(1) above) which we
believe, over time, will generate profitable net sales growth and sustainable positive free cash flow; and (e) our vision to provide glamour,
excitement and innovation to consumers through high-quality products at affordable prices. Forward-looking statements involve risks,
uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements.
Please see Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” and Part II, “Forward-Looking Statements” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K included in this
annual report for a full description of these risks, uncertainties and other factors, as well as other important information with respect to our
forward-looking statements. Revlon, Inc. filed the CEO and CFO certifications required under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
as Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2, respectively, to its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the SEC
on February 25, 2009. On June 30, 2008, Revlon,
Inc. filed the Annual CEO Certification, without qualification, pursuant to
Section 303A.12(a) of the NYSE Listed Company Manual.

Board of Directors

Officers

Operating Committee

Ronald O. Perelman
Chairman of the Board

David L. Kennedy
President and Chief Executive Officer

David L. Kennedy***
President and Chief Executive Officer

Alan T. Ennis***
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer;
President, Revlon International

Robert K. Kretzman***
Executive Vice President,
Human Resources;
Chief Legal Officer,
General Counsel and Secretary

Edward A. Mammone
Senior Vice President,
Corporate Controller and
Chief Accounting Officer

Mark M. Sexton
Senior Vice President, Taxes

Michael T. Sheehan
Senior Vice President,
Deputy General Counsel and
Assistant Secretary

Alan T. Ennis
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer;
President, Revlon International

Chris Elshaw
Executive Vice President and
General Manager, United States

Carl K. Kooyoomjian
Executive Vice President,
Technical Affairs and
Worldwide Operations

Robert K. Kretzman
Executive Vice President,
Human Resources;
Chief Legal Officer,
General Counsel and Secretary

Manuel Blanco
Senior Vice President and
Managing Director, Latin America

Graeme Howard
Senior Vice President and
Managing Director, Asia Pacific

Simon Worraker
Senior Vice President and
Managing Director, Europe

Investor Relations

Abbe F. Goldstein
Senior Vice President,
Investor Relations and
Corporate Communications

Ronald O. Perelman
Chairman of the Board,
Revlon, Inc.;
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer,
MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings Inc.

David L. Kennedy
President and Chief Executive Officer

Alan T. Ennis
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer;
President, Revlon International

Alan S. Bernikow (1, 2)*
Retired Deputy Chief Executive Officer,
Deloitte & Touche LLP

Paul J. Bohan (1, 3)
Retired Managing Director,
Salomon Smith Barney

Meyer Feldberg (1, 3)**
Dean Emeritus,
Columbia Business School

Ann D. Jordan
Chairman,
The National Symphony Orchestra;
Director,
Catalyst Inc.

Debra L. Lee (3)
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer,
BET Holdings LLC

Tamara Mellon
President and Founder,
J. Choo Limited

Barry F. Schwartz (2)
Executive Vice Chairman and
Chief Administrative Officer,
MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings Inc.

Kathi P. Seifert (1)
Chairman,
Katapult, LLC

Kenneth L. Wolfe (2, 3)
Retired Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer,
The Hershey Company

1.
2.
3.

Audit Committee member
Compensation and Stock Plan Committee member
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee member

*
**
***

Audit Committee Chairman; Compensation and Stock Plan Committee Chairman
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chairman
Executive Officer

BMT01177_AR_Cvr_28.indd   2

BMT01177_AR_Cvr_28.indd   2

4/10/2009   3:18:41 PM

4/10/2009   3:18:41 PM

2
0
0
8

A
N
N
U
A
L

R
E
P
O
R
T

2008  A N N UA L   R E P O R T

BMT01177_AR_Cvr_30.indd   1
BMT01177_AR_Cvr_30.indd   1

4/13/2009   9:32:00 AM
4/13/2009   9:32:00 AM