ReWalk Robotics Ltd.
Annual Report 2016

Plain-text annual report

UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington, D.C. 20549FORM 10-KxxANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016or¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934For the transition period from _____ to ______Commission File Number: 001-36612ReWalk Robotics Ltd.(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)Israel Not applicable(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. employer identification no.) 3 Hatnufa Street, Floor 6, Yokneam Ilit, Israel 2069203(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)Registrant's telephone number, including area code: +972.4.959.0123Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of Each ClassName of Each Exchange on Which RegisteredOrdinary Shares, par value NIS 0.01 per shareThe Nasdaq Stock Market LLC Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: NoneIndicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No xIndicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No x Indicate by a check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filingrequirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No oIndicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required tobe submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required tosubmit and post such files). Yes x No oIndicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the bestof the Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to thisForm 10-K. oIndicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See thedefinitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Large accelerated filer oAccelerated filer xNon-accelerated filer o(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)Smaller reporting company oIndicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No xThe aggregate market value of the Ordinary Shares held by non-affiliates of the Registrant based upon the closing price of the Ordinary Shares as reported bythe Nasdaq Global Market on June 30, 2016 (the last business day of the Registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter) was $59,417,492.As of February 15, 2017, the Registrant had outstanding 16,351,009 Ordinary Shares, par value NIS 0.01 per share.DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE Portions of our proxy statement for our 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which is to be filed within 120 days after the end of our 2016 fiscal year, areincorporated by reference into Part III of this annual report on Form 10-K.REWALK ROBOTICS LTD. FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No PART I ITEM 1.BUSINESS1ITEM 1A.RISK FACTORS15ITEM 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS42ITEM 2.PROPERTIES42ITEM 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS42ITEM 4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES44 PART II ITEM 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASESOF EQUITY SECURITIES45ITEM 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA48ITEM 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS50ITEM 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK63ITEM 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA64ITEM 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE64ITEM 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES64ITEM 9B.OTHER INFORMATION65 PART III ITEM 10.DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE66ITEM 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION66ITEM 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDERMATTERS67ITEM 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE67ITEM 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES67 PART IV ITEM 15.EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES67ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY68SIGNATURES68POWER OF ATTORNEY68INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSF-1iDefinitions and IntroductionOur legal and commercial name is ReWalk Robotics Ltd. We are a company limited by shares organized under the laws of the State of Israel andwere founded in 2001. In September 2014, we listed our shares on the Nasdaq Global Market. We have irrevocably appointed ReWalk Robotics, Inc. as ouragent to receive service of process in any action against us in any United States federal or state court. The address of ReWalk Robotics, Inc. is 200 DonaldLynch Blvd., Marlborough, Massachusetts 01752. As used herein, and unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, the terms “ReWalk”, “the Company”,“we”, “us”, “our” or “ours” refer to ReWalk Robotics Ltd. and its subsidiaries.Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking StatementsThis annual report on Form 10-K, or annual report, contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, and the safe harborprovisions of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, that are based on our management’s beliefs and assumptions and on informationcurrently available to our management. Forward-looking statements include information concerning our possible or assumed future results of operations,business strategies, financing plans, competitive position, industry environment, potential growth opportunities, potential market opportunities and theeffects of competition. Forward-looking statements may include projections regarding our future performance and, in some cases, can be identified by wordslike “anticipate,” “assume,” “believe,” “could,” “seek,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “future,” “should,”“will,” “would” or similar expressions that convey uncertainty of future events or outcomes and the negatives of those terms. These statements may be foundin this section of this quarterly report titled “Part I, Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” andelsewhere in this quarterly report. These statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding:•our expectations regarding future growth, including our ability to increase sales in our existing geographic markets, expand to new marketsand achieve our planned expense reductions;•our management’s conclusion, and our independent registered public accounting firm’s statement in its opinion relating to our accompanyingconsolidated financial statements, that there is a substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern;•our ability to maintain and grow our reputation and the market acceptance of our products;•our ability to achieve reimbursement from third-party payors for our products;•our ability to repay our secured indebtedness;•our expectations as to our clinical research program and clinical results;•our expectations as to the results of and Food and Drug Administration’s, or the FDA’s, potential regulatory developments with respect to ourmandatory post-market surveillance study;•the outcome of ongoing shareholder class action litigation relating to our initial public offering;•our ability to improve our products and develop new products;•our ability to maintain adequate protection of our intellectual property and to avoid violation of the intellectual property rights of others;•our ability to gain and maintain regulatory approvals;•our ability to use effectively the proceeds of our follow-on public offering of ordinary shares and warrants;•our ability to secure capital from our at-the-market equity distribution program based on the price range of our ordinary shares and conditionsin the financial markets;•our ability to maintain relationships with existing customers and develop relationships with new customers; and,ii•the risk that we are currently not in compliance with The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC's, or Nasdaq, continued listing requirements, which maycause us to be delisted.The preceding list is not intended to be an exhaustive list of all of our statements. The statements are based on our beliefs, assumptions andexpectations of future performance, taking into account the information currently available to us. These statements are only predictions based upon ourcurrent expectations and projections about future events. There are important factors that could cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance orachievements to differ materially from the results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the statements. In particular, youshould consider the risks provided under “Part I. Item 1A. Risk Factors" in this annual report.You should not rely upon forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in theforward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee that future results, levels of activity, performance and events and circumstances reflected inthe forward-looking statements will be achieved or will occur.These statements may also be found in the sections of this annual report titled “Part I. Item 1. Business,” “Part I. Item 1A. Risk Factors,” “Part II.Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and elsewhere in this annual report.You should not put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statement in this annual report speaks only as of thedate hereof. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements for any reason after the date of thisannual report, to conform these statements to actual results or to changes in our expectations.Where You Can Find Other InformationOur principal executive offices are located at 3 Hatnufa Street, Floor 6, Yokneam Ilit 2069203, Israel, and our telephone number is +972 (4) 959-0123. Our website is www.rewalk.com. Information contained, or that can be accessed through, our website does not constitute a part of this annual report andis not incorporated by reference herein. We have included our website address in this annual report solely for informational purposes. Information that wefurnish with or file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, including annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q,current reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to, or exhibits included in, these reports are available for download, free of charge, on our website as soonas reasonably practicable after such materials are filed or furnished with the SEC. As we were subject to the information reporting requirements applicable toforeign private issuers prior to January 1, 2016, we filed with the SEC an annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2014 and submitted tothe SEC, on Form 6-K, unaudited quarterly financial information during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015. These reports may also be downloaded freeof charge on our website. Our SEC filings, including exhibits filed or furnished therewith, are also available on the SEC’s website at SEC.gov. You mayobtain and copy any document we furnish or file with the SEC at the SEC’s public reference room at 100 F Street, NE, Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549.You may obtain information on the operation of the SEC’s public reference facilities by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. You may request copies of thesedocuments, upon payment of a duplicating fee, by writing to the SEC at its principal office at 100 F Street, NE, Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549.iiiTable of ContentsPART IITEM 1. BUSINESSOverviewWe are an innovative medical device company that is designing, developing and commercializing exoskeletons that allow individuals withmobility impairments or other medical conditions the ability to stand and walk once again. We have developed and are continuing to commercializeReWalk, an exoskeleton that uses our patented tilt-sensor technology and an on-board computer and motion sensors to drive motorized legs that powermovement.Current ReWalk designs are intended for people with paraplegia, a spinal cord injury resulting in complete or incomplete paralysis of the legs, whohave the use of their upper bodies and arms. We currently offer two products: ReWalk Personal and ReWalk Rehabilitation. ReWalk Personal is currentlydesigned for everyday use by paraplegic individuals at home and in their communities, and is custom fitted for each user. ReWalk Rehabilitation is currentlydesigned for use by paraplegia patients in the clinical rehabilitation environment, where it provides valuable exercise and therapy. It also enables individualsto evaluate their capacity for using ReWalk Personal in the future. In 2011, we launched ReWalk Rehabilitation for use in hospitals and rehabilitation centersin the United States and Europe. We began marketing ReWalk Personal in Europe with CE mark clearance at the end of 2012 and received U.S. Food andDrug Administration, or FDA, clearance to market it in the United States in June 2014. Additionally, we have received regulatory approval to sell the ReWalkdevice in other countries. In the future we intend to seek approval from the applicable regulatory agencies in other jurisdictions where we seek to market theReWalk device.ReWalk is a breakthrough product that can fundamentally change the health and life experiences of users. Designed for all-day use, ReWalk isbattery-powered and consists of a light, wearable exoskeleton with integrated motors at the joints, an array of sensors and a computer-based control system topower knee and hip movement. ReWalk controls movement using subtle shifts in the user’s center of gravity. A forward tilt of the upper body is sensed by thesystem, which initiates the first step. Repeated body shifting generates a sequence of steps which allows a gait, that mimics a natural pattern of the legs withfunctional walking speed. Because the exoskeleton supports its own weight and facilitates the user’s gait, users do not expend unnecessary energy whilewalking. While ReWalk does not allow side-to-side actuation, users are able to turn by shifting their weight to the side. ReWalk also allows users to sit, standand, depending on local regulatory approvals, climb and descend stairs. Use on stairs is not cleared by the FDA in the United States. ReWalk users are able toindependently operate the devices, and most are able to put on and remove the devices by themselves. Our safety guidelines and FDA specifications,however, require users to be accompanied by a trained companion.Published clinical studies demonstrate ReWalk’s ability to deliver a functional walking speed. In addition, our interim analysis of an ongoingclinical study and our experience working with healthcare practitioners and ReWalk users suggests that ReWalk has the potential to provide secondaryhealth benefits. These benefits include reducing pain and spasticity, improving bowel and urinary tract function, body and bone composition, metabolismand physical fitness, reducing hospitalizations and dependence on medications, as well as emotional and psychological benefits. Because of these secondarymedical benefits, we believe that ReWalk has the ability to reduce the lifetime healthcare costs of individuals with spinal cord injuries, making iteconomically attractive for individuals and third-party payors. We believe additional clinical studies currently underway and planned clinical studies willdemonstrate these benefits. While we believe that ReWalk offers significant advantages over competing technologies and therapies, disadvantages includethe time it takes for a user to put on ReWalk, the slower pace of ReWalk compared to a wheelchair, the weight of ReWalk when carried, which makes it moreburdensome for a companion to transport than a wheelchair, and the requirement that users be accompanied by a trained companion.Development of ReWalk took over a decade and was spurred by the experiences of our founder, Dr. Amit Goffer, who became a quadriplegic due toan accident. As of December 31, 2016, we had placed 112 units in use at rehabilitation centers and 214 personal units in a home or community use.Furthermore, 51 of the units we placed during the twelve months ended December 31, 2016 were paid for by insurance reimbursement. In the near future, weexpect growth in our sales and marketing expense will be driven by our continued investment in our reimbursement efforts, as we continue to pursueinsurance claims on a case-by-case basis, manage claims through the review process and external appeals, and invest in efforts to expand coverage. As ofDecember 31, 2016, there were 199 pending insurance claims relating to coverage for our product, compared to 90 as of December 31, 2015.Our commercialization strategy is to penetrate rehabilitation centers, hospitals and similar facilities that treat patients with spinal cord injuries tobecome an integral part of their rehabilitation programs and to develop a broad based training network with these facilities to prepare users for home andcommunity use. According to the National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center, 87% of persons with spinal cord injuries are sent to private, non-institutionalresidences (in most cases, their homes) after hospital discharge. As a result, while almost half of our sales to date have been for use in a rehabilitation setting,the primary focus of our commercialization efforts going forward will be marketing ReWalk Personal for routine use at home, work or in the community, andwe expect sales of ReWalk Personal to account for the substantial majority of our revenues in the future.1We expect to generate revenues from a combination of third-party payors, self-payors and institutions. While a broad uniform policy of coverage andreimbursement by third-party commercial payors currently does not exist for electronic exoskeleton technologies such as ReWalk, we are pursuing variouspaths of reimbursement and support fundraising efforts by institutions and clinics. In December 2015, the Veterans’ Administration, or the VA, issued anational policy for the evaluation, training and procurement of ReWalk Personal exoskeleton systems for all qualifying veterans across the United States. TheVA policy, is the first national coverage policy in the United States for qualifying individuals who have suffered spinal cord injury. As of December 31, 2016,we had placed 14 units as part of the VA policy. Additionally, to date, several private insurers in the United States and Europe have provided reimbursementfor ReWalk in certain cases. Recent Developments•In the second quarter of 2016, we announced our collaboration with Harvard University’s Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, or"Harvard". Our collaboration with Harvard centers on the research, design, development and commercialization of lightweight exoskeleton systemtechnologies for lower limb disabilities, which are intended to treat stroke, multiple sclerosis, mobility limitations for the elderly and other medicalapplications. For more information see, “Research and Development” below.•On November 1, 2016, we closed our follow-on public offering of 3,250,000 units, each consisting of one ordinary share and 0.75 of a warrant topurchase one ordinary share. The Company's gross proceeds were $12.2 million. For more information see, “Part II. Item 7. Management’s Discussionand Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations." and Note 8c(2) to our consolidated financial statements set forth in “Part II. Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”.•In early January 2017, we announced our plans to reduce our operating expenses by up to 30% as compared to 2016. These reductions will beachieved through a combination of targeted savings, including the completion of specific projects focused on quality improvement initiatives andefforts to reduce overall product cost, a realignment of and reduction in staffing to match the Company’s 2017 business goals, and a reduction inother corporate spending. Overview of Spinal Anatomy and Spinal Cord InjurySpinal AnatomyThe spine is the central core of the human skeleton and provides structural support, alignment and flexibility to the body. It consists of 24interlocking bones, called vertebrae, which are stacked on top of one another. The spine is comprised of five regions, of which there are three primary regions:cervical, thoracic and lumbar. In addition, there is also the sacral region, or sacrum, a triangular-shaped bone and the coccyx, or “tailbone,” the bottomportion of the spine.The spinal cord, housed inside the bony spinal column, is a complex bundle of nerves serving as the main pathway for information connecting thebrain and nervous system. The spinal cord is divided into 31 segments that feed sensory impulses into the spinal cord, which in turn relays them to the brain.Conversely, motor impulses generated in the brain are relayed by the spinal cord to the spinal nerves, which pass the impulses to muscles and glands. Thespinal cord mediates the reflex responses to some sensory impulses directly, without recourse to the brain, for example, when a person’s leg is tapped,producing the knee jerk reflex.2Spinal Cord Injury Spinal cord injury is the result of a direct trauma to the nerves themselves or damage to thesurrounding bones and soft tissues which ultimately impacts the spinal cord. Spinal cord damage results in aloss of function, such as mobility or feeling. In most people who have spinal cord injury, the spinal cord isintact. Spinal cord injury is not the same as back injury, which may result from pinched nerves or ruptureddisks. Even when a person sustains a break in a vertebra or vertebrae, there may not be any spinal cordinjury if the spinal cord itself is not affected. There are two types of spinal cord injury – complete andincomplete. In a complete injury, a person loses all ability to feel and voluntarily move below the level ofthe injury. In an incomplete injury, there is some functioning below the level of the injury.Upon examination, a patient is assigned a level of injury depending on the location of the spinalcord injury. Cervical level injuries cause paralysis or weakness in both arms and legs and is referred to asquadriplegia. Sometimes this type of injury is accompanied by loss of physical sensation, respiratory issues,bowel, bladder, and sexual dysfunction. Thoracic level injuries can cause paralysis or weakness of the legs(paraplegia) along with loss of physical sensation, bowel, bladder, and sexual dysfunction. In most cases,arms and hands are not affected. Lumbar level injuries result in paralysis or weakness of the legs(paraplegia). Loss of physical sensation, bowel, bladder, and sexual dysfunction can occur. The shoulder,arm, and hand functions are usually unaffected. Sacral level injuries primarily cause loss of bowel andbladder function as well as sexual dysfunction. Image of Separated Spinal Cord of anAdult Market OpportunityConfinement to a wheelchair can cause severe physical and psychological deterioration, resulting in bad health, poor quality of life, low self-esteemand high medical expenses. In addition, the secondary medical consequences of paralysis can include difficulty with bowel and urinary tract function,osteoporosis, loss of lean mass, gain in fat mass, insulin resistance, diabetes and heart disease. The cost of treating these conditions is substantial. TheNational Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center, or the NSCISC, estimates that complications related to paraplegia cost, excluding indirect costs such as lossesin wages, fringe benefits and productivity, approximately $500,000 in the first year post-injury and significant additional amounts over the course of anindividual’s lifetime. Further, secondary complications related to spinal cord injury can reduce life expectancies for spinal cord injury, or SCI, patients. Theyoung average age at time of injury and significant remaining life expectancy, the likelihood of living at home and lifetime cost of treatment highlight theneed for an out-of-hospital solution with demonstrated health and social benefits.The NSCISC estimates as of 2016 that there were 282,000 people in the United States living with spinal cord injury or SCI, with an annual incidenceof approximately 17,000 new cases per year. Approximately 42,000 of such patients are veterans, and are eligible for medical care and other benefits from theVA. With 24 VA spinal cord injury centers, the VA has the largest single network of spinal cord injury care in the United States.The University of Alabama-Birmingham Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation operates the NSCISC, which maintains the world’slargest database on spinal cord injury research. Between 2010 and 2015, motor vehicle crashes have been the leading cause of reported spinal cord injurycases (38%), followed by falls (31%), acts of violence (14%) and sports injuries (9%). Nearly 80% of spinal cord injuries occur among the male population.According to NSCISC data, upon hospital discharge, 87% of persons with spinal cord injuries are sent to private, non-institutional residence (in most cases,their homes prior to injury).Based on information from a 2013 report by the NSCISC, 41.1% of the total U.S. population of SCI patients suffered injuries between levels T4 andL5. Three published ReWalk trials for SCI patients had an aggregate screening acceptance rate of 79%considering all current FDA limitations, resulting in anestimated 33% of the total population of SCI patients being candidates for current ReWalk products. For important qualifying information about thisdetermination, see “Part I. Item 1A. Risk Factors-The market for medical exoskeletons is new and unproven, and important assumptions about the potentialmarket for our products may be inaccurate.”3Our SolutionsDesigned for all-day use and worn over the clothes of users, ReWalk consists of a light wearable exoskeleton with integrated motors at the joints, an array ofsensors and a backpack or waist pack that contains the batteries and the computer-based control system. The control system utilizes proprietary algorithms toanalyze upper-body motions and trigger and maintain gait patterns and other modes of operation (such as stair-climbing and shifting from sitting tostanding), leaving the user’s hands free for self-support and other functions. Because the exoskeleton supports its own weight, users do not expendunnecessary energy while walking. Safety measures include crutches, which provide additional stability, fall protection, which lowers users slowly and safelyin the event of a malfunction, and the secure “stand” mode, which automatically initiates if the user does not begin walking within two seconds. ReWalk isalso equipped with maintenance alarms, warnings and backup batteries. The rechargeable batteries are easily accessible and can be recharged in any standardpower outlet. Upon completion of training, which generally consists of approximately 15 one-hour sessions, most users are able to put on and remove thedevice by themselves while sitting, typically in less than 15 minutes.As discussed above, current ReWalk designs are intended for people with paraplegia who have the use of their upper bodies and arms. We currentlyoffer two ReWalk products: ReWalk Personal and ReWalk Rehabilitation. For a breakdown of our revenues from sales of each of ReWalk Personal andReWalk Rehabilitation, see “Part II. Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations." ReWalk Personal 6.0• ReWalk Personal: intended for everyday use at home, at work or in the community.We began marketing ReWalk Personal in Europe with CE mark clearance at the end of2012. We received clearance to market ReWalk Personal in the United States in June2014. ReWalk Personal units are all manufactured according to the same mechanicalspecifications. Each unit is then permanently sized to fit the individual user and thesoftware is configured for the user’s specifications by the rehabilitation center, clinic ordistributor.• ReWalk Rehabilitation: designed for the clinical rehabilitation environment,ReWalk Rehabilitation has adjustable sizing enabling multiple patient use. ReWalkRehabilitation provides a valuable means of exercise and therapy. It also enablesindividuals to evaluate their capacity for using ReWalk Personal in the future. Webegan marketing ReWalk Rehabilitation for use in hospitals, rehabilitation centers andstand-alone training centers in the United States and Europe in 2011. ReWalkRehabilitation units are all manufactured according to the same mechanicalspecifications and are equipped with adjustable sizing for multi-patient use and,software which can be configured for the user’s specifications. Our analysis of published initial clinical studies and our experience working with health care practitioners and ReWalk users suggest that ReWalk hasthe potential to provide secondary health benefits. These benefits include reducing pain and spasticity and improving bowel and urinary tract function, bodyand bone composition, metabolism and physical fitness, as well as reducing hospitalizations and dependence on medications. Because of these secondarymedical benefits, we believe that ReWalk has the ability to reduce the lifetime healthcare costs of individuals with spinal cord injuries, making iteconomically attractive for individuals, healthcare providers such as hospitals and rehabilitation centers, and third-party payors.We intend to continue to develop future generations of ReWalk, with a range of improvements including additional functionality, more efficient drivemechanism, slimmer profile and lighter body, as well as other improvements.Future ProductsWe plan to expand the designs and indications that we address beyond paraplegia to include other lower limb disabilities affecting gait and abilityto walk, such as stroke, multiple sclerosis and cerebral palsy.Over five million Americans have suffered a stroke, with 780,000 new incidences expected each year. Physical limitations after stroke vary from caseto case, but approximately 60% of these individuals will have lower limb disability, which could require them to seek additional assistance in walking.4According to the Multiple Sclerosis Foundation, as many as 400,000 Americans suffer from multiple sclerosis. Research indicates thatapproximately half of these individuals would be classified as somewhere between a 4.0 and a 7.0 on the Kurtzke Disability Status Scale (DSS), a measure ofthe need for walking assistance. Individuals with DSS 4.0 suffer from relatively severe disability while individuals with DSS 7.0 are generally restricted to awheelchair. Multiple sclerosis is a progressive disease, as approximately one-third of multiple sclerosis patients end up with full paralysis while two-thirdsremain able to walk, though many will need an aid, such as a cane or crutches, and some will use a scooter or wheelchair due to fatigue, weakness or balanceproblems, or due to a need to conserve energy.We are currently engaged in research and development efforts with Harvard University’s Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, toaddress the mobility needs of stroke, multiple sclerosis and cerebral palsy patients. ReWalk soft suit exoskeleton• ReWalk soft suit exoskeleton: We are also developing ReWalk soft suit exoskeletonfor individuals who have suffered a stroke. We expect to complete the development ofthis lightweight exosuit in the near future, at which time we will begin clinical testingand apply for regulatory clearances. We plan to commercialize the ReWalk strokeproduct in 2018. Third-Party ReimbursementsUnited StatesIn the United States rehabilitation centers generally purchase the ReWalk Rehabilitation unit and then charge patients for ReWalk therapy on a per-session basis. These institutions may then seek reimbursement from insurance companies for each session.In December 2015, the VA issued a national policy for the evaluation, training and procurement of ReWalk Personal exoskeleton systems for allqualifying veterans across the United States. The VA policy, is the first national coverage policy in the United States for qualifying individuals who havesuffered spinal cord injury.While no broad uniform policy of coverage and reimbursement for electronic exoskeleton medical technology exists among commercial insurancepayors in the United States or elsewhere, reimbursement may be achieved on a case-by-case basis. To date, payments for the ReWalk Personal device havebeen made primarily through case-by-case determinations by third-party payors (including several private insurers in the United States), by self-payors anddonations and, to a lesser extent, through the use of funds from insurance and/or accident settlements.Generally, private insurance companies do not currently cover or provide reimbursement for any personal medical exoskeleton products, includingReWalk Personal, and are limited to case-by-case decisions. As of December 31, 2016, We had approximately 85 cases pending in the United States forinsurance coverage decisions. For more information, see “Part I. Item 1A. Risk Factors-Risks Related to Our Business and Our Industry-We may fail to secureor maintain adequate insurance coverage or reimbursement for ReWalk by third-party payors….”As part of our plan for growth, we intend to continue working with commercial insurance companies, health care practitioners, physicians,researchers, and the SCI community to support efforts to demonstrate the benefits and the case to support reimbursement of the ReWalk Personal device.• We launched our post market surveillance study during the second quarter of 2016, and we also currently support clinical studies and academicpublications that demonstrate the medical benefits of ReWalk. For more information on the post-market surveillance study, see “Part I. Item 1A. RiskFactors-Risks Related to Government Regulation-The FDA previously sent us letters regarding potential regulatory action for deficiencies in ourmandatory post-market surveillance study on our ReWalk Personal 6.0….”5• In the future, we will pursue coverage through the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, or CMS. We expect that it could take three to fiveyears to receive a decision from CMS, but we believe that other sources of payment will be sufficient to support our business. For more information,see “Part I. Item 1A. Risk Factors-Risks Related to Our Business and Our Industry-We may fail to secure or maintain adequate insurance coverage orreimbursement for ReWalk by third-party payors….”Western EuropeReimbursement for ReWalk in Europe varies by country. While we are not aware of any public or private payor that regularly covers ReWalk forrehabilitation or personal use, third-party payors have provided reimbursement for our products in certain cases in Germany and Italy.We are initially focusing our efforts in Europe in Germany where we continue to make progress toward achieving ReWalk coverage from the variousgovernment, private and worker's compensation payors. As there is currently no broad coverage policy in Germany, a patient who wishes to use ReWalk mustapply for coverage. If such patient is denied, then such patient must appeal the decision in court, relying on supporting documentation from a health careprovider and other medical evidence. As of December 31, 2016, there were 114 such cases pending in Germany, and we believe that these will eventuallylead German insurers to provide coverage on a broad scale. We plan to continue to pursue this case-by-case strategy and expect that once the precedent forcoverage is established, seeking coverage will become more routine. For more information, see “Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors-We may fail to secure ormaintain adequate insurance coverage or reimbursement for ReWalk by third-party payors, including the VA, which risk may be heightened if insurers findReWalk to be investigational or experimental or if new government regulations change existing reimbursement policies.”We continue to support clinical research and academic publications, which we believe will further support the case for coverage.We are also pursuing reimbursement by private insurers and worker’s compensation in various European countries.Other Funding SourcesIn addition to being funded by third-party payors, including private insurance plans, government programs such as the VA, and Worker'sCompensation, ReWalk is also funded by self-payors. Self-payors also include individuals who purchase ReWalk with funds from legal settlements withinsurance companies or third parties.Research and DevelopmentWe are committed to investing in a robust research and development program to enhance our current ReWalk products and to develop our pipelineof new and complementary products, and we believe that ongoing research and development efforts are essential to our success. Our research anddevelopment team includes engineers, researchers, marketing, quality, manufacturing, regulatory and clinical personnel, who work closely together to design,enhance and validate our technologies. This research and development team conceptualizes technologies and then builds and tests prototypes before refiningand/or redesigning as necessary. Our regulatory and clinical personnel work in parallel with engineers and researchers, allowing us to anticipate and resolvepotential issues at early stages in the development cycle.We plan to focus our research and development efforts in the future by continually improving and expanding our functional technological platform,developing a lightweight “soft suit” exoskeleton device that will assist patients who had stroke or multiple sclerosis, developing our next generation ofReWalk with design improvements. and building upon our technological platform to address new medical indications that affect the ability to walk.We conduct our research and development efforts at our facility in Yokneam, Israel. We believe that the close interaction among our research anddevelopment, marketing and manufacturing groups allows for timely and effective realization of our new product concepts.Our research and development efforts have been financed, in part, through funding from the Israel Innovation Authority, or the IIA (formerly knownas Office of the Chief Scientist in the Israel Ministry of Economy), and from the BIRD Foundation. From our inception through December 31, 2016, wereceived funding totaling $740,000 from the IIA and $500,000 from the BIRD Foundation. Our research and development expenses, net were approximately$9.0 million, $5.9 million and $8.6 million for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2016, December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. For moreinformation regarding our research and development financing arrangements and expenses, see “Part II. Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis ofFinancial Condition and Results of Operations - Components of Our Statements of Operations - Operating Expenses," "—Liquidity and Capital Resources”and “—Grants and Other Funding.”6Research and Development CollaborationsOn May 16, 2016, we entered into the Research Collaboration Agreement, or Collaboration Agreement, and the Exclusive License Agreement, orLicense Agreement, with Harvard. Under the Collaboration Agreement, we and Harvard agreed to collaborate on research regarding the development oflightweight soft suit exoskeleton system technologies for lower limb disabilities, which are intended to treat stroke, multiple sclerosis, mobility limitationsfor the elderly and other medical applications. Under the Collaboration Agreement, we must pay Harvard quarterly installment payments to help fund theresearch. Subject to the terms of the Collaboration Agreement, Harvard and we are required to report our respective research results and findings to each otheron a regular basis. The Collaboration Agreement governs ownership of the research results and inventions generated in performance of the researchcollaboration, and provides us the option to negotiate with Harvard for a license to certain new inventions of Harvard conceived in performance of thecollaboration. The Collaboration Agreement will expire on May 16, 2021. Subject to payment of a minimum funding commitment under applicable circumstances,we may terminate the agreement if there is a loss of Harvard’s principal investigator or if we do not believe that we have or can secure sufficient funding toproceed. The Collaboration Agreement may also be terminated by either Harvard or us due to a material uncured breach by the other party or upontermination of the License Agreement.Under the License Agreement, we are granted an exclusive, worldwide royalty-bearing license under certain patents of Harvard relating tolightweight “soft suit” exoskeleton system technologies for lower limb disabilities, a royalty-free license under certain related know-how and the option toobtain a license under certain inventions conceived under our joint research collaboration. Harvard retains the right to practice the patents for research,educational and scholarly purposes. We are required to use commercially reasonable efforts to develop products under the license in accordance with anagreed-upon development plan and to introduce and market such products commercially. In addition to an upfront fee and royalties on net sales, we areobligated to pay Harvard certain milestone payments upon the achievement of certain product development and commercialization milestones. We alsoagreed to reimburse Harvard for expenses incurred in connection with the filing, prosecution and maintenance of the licensed patents.The License Agreement will continue in full force and effect until the expiration of the last-to-expire valid claim of the licensed patents. We mayterminate the Agreement for any reason upon 60 days’ prior written notice, while Harvard may terminate the Agreement if we do not obtain requisiteinsurance, becomes insolvent or fail to meet certain development milestones. The License Agreement may also be terminated by Harvard or us due to theother party’s material uncured breach.The Collaboration Agreement and License Agreement contain, as applicable, customary representations and warranties and customary enforcement,indemnification and insurance provisions. For further discussion of the Collaboration Agreement and License Agreement, see Note 9 to our consolidatedfinancial statements in “Part II. Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Date.”In September 2013, we entered into a strategic alliance with Yaskawa Electric Corporation, pursuant to which, among other arrangements, Yaskawacan apply its expertise in product and quality improvements to ReWalk. Yaskawa is a global leader in the fields of industrial robotics and automation, and webelieve that this relationship provides us with opportunities for product improvement and increased product offerings in the future. For more informationregarding our relationship with Yaskawa, see “—Sales and Marketing” and “Part III. Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and DirectorIndependence.”7Clinical StudiesMultiple clinical studies, some of which are published in peer-reviewed journals, have been carried out to establish the effectiveness and benefits of ReWalkfor individuals with spinal cord injuries. Certain of the benefits tested include:•reduced pain;•improved bowel and urinary tract function;•reduced spasticity;•increases in joint range of motion for the hip and ankle joints;•improved sleep and reduced fatigue;•increase in oxygen uptake and heart rate as a result of walking as opposed to sitting and standing;•ability to ambulate at a speed greater than 0.4 meters per second, which is considered to be conducive to outdoor related communityambulation; and•reduced hospitalizations.Although study participants and other ReWalk users have reported the secondary health benefits listed above, currently there is no conclusiveclinical data establishing any secondary health benefits of ReWalk.Community Engagement and EducationWe devote significant resources to engagement with and education of the spinal cord injury community with respect to the benefits of ReWalk. Weactively seek opportunities to partner with hospitals, rehabilitation centers and key opinion leaders to engage in research and development and clinicalactivities. We also seek to support educational and charitable organizations with fundraising and outreach programs. We believe that our success has been,and will continue to be driven in part by, our reputation and acceptance within the spinal cord injury community.Sales and MarketingWe market and sell our products directly to third party payors, institutions, including rehabilitation centers, individuals and through third-partydistributors. We sell our products directly in Germany and the United States and primarily through distributors in our other markets. In our direct markets, wehave established relationships with rehabilitation centers and the spinal cord injury community, and in our indirect markets, our distributors maintain theserelationships. Sales of ReWalk Personal are generated primarily from the patient base at our rehabilitation centers, referrals through the spinal cord injurycommunity and direct inquiries from potential users. One customer accounted for 33.3% and 14.8% of our total revenues for the years ended December 31,2016 and 2015, respectively.We have established centers of operations in Marlborough, Massachusetts, Berlin, Germany and Yokneam, Israel, to manage sales in North America,Europe, and the rest of world, respectively.Services and Customer SupportOur centers of operations in Marlborough, Massachusetts and Berlin, Germany coordinate all customer support and product service functions forNorth America and Europe, respectively, through dedicated technical service personnel who provide product services and customer support through trainingto healthcare providers and support to product users.CompetitionThe market in which we operate is characterized by active competition and rapid technological change, and we expect competition to increase.Competition arises from providers of other mobility systems and prosthetic devices.We are aware of a number of other companies developing competing technology and devices, and some of these competitors may have greaterresources, greater name recognition, broader product lines, or larger customer bases than we do. Our principal competitors in the medical exoskeleton marketconsist of Ekso Bionics (OTC: EKSO), Rex Bionics (London Stock Exchange: RXB), Cyberdyne (Tokyo Stock Exchange: 7779), and Parker Hannifin(NYSE: PH). We believe we have key competitive advantages over these companies, such as our tilt-sensor technology that provides a self-initiated walkingexperience, more natural gait and faster functional walking speed, ReWalk’s ability to support its own weight and broad user specifications. ReWalk Personalis the first medical exoskeleton cleared by the FDA for personal use in the United States.8In addition, we compete with alternative devices and alternative therapies, including treadmill-based gait therapies, such as those offered byHocoma, AlterG, Aretech and Reha Technology. Other medical device or robotics companies, academic and research institutions, or others may develop newtechnologies or therapies that provide a superior walking experience, are more effective in treating the secondary medical conditions that we target or are lessexpensive than our current or future products. Our technologies and products could be rendered obsolete by such developments.We may also compete with other treatments and technologies that address the secondary medical conditions that ReWalk seeks to mitigate.Intellectual PropertyProtection of our intellectual property is important to our business. We seek to protect our intellectual property through a combination of patents,trademarks, confidentiality and assignment agreements with our employees and certain of our contractors and confidentiality agreements with certain of ourconsultants, scientific advisors and other vendors and contractors. In addition, we rely on trade secrets law to protect our proprietary software and productcandidates/products in development.In addition to ReWalk's portfolio of issued patents and patent applications, the Company licenses certain patented technology from third party asdescribed above under the "Research and Development" section.As of February 1, 2017, we have five issued patents in the United States and one issued patent in Europe, as well as 24 pending patent applicationsin various countries around the world for our technology including the United states and Europe. As such, we have apparatus patent claims in the UnitedStates and Europe covering aspects of ReWalk and similar devices which use a plurality of sensors to empower tilt-sensor technology. In addition, in theUnited States, we have method patent claims covering certain methods of user activation and control of systems such as ReWalk, including by sensing theuser's torso lean or weight shifts. While our apparatus claims focus on protecting ReWalk in terms of its physical and structural characteristics, we believe thatour method claims, which protect the process behind how ReWalk is controlled by the user, provide additional protection for our tilt sensor technology. Wedo not currently license any of the technology contained in our products other than with respect to technology that is generally publicly available, but wemay do so in the future.Patents filed both in the United States and Europe generally have a life of 20 years from the filing date. As the oldest of our issued patents relating toour tilt-sensor technology was filed in May 2001, our patents on that technology do not begin to expire until May 2021.We currently hold a registered trademark in Israel for the mark “ReWalk” and are in the process of registering this trademark in the United States.The employment agreement of our founder and former President and Chief Technology Officer, Dr. Amit Goffer, provides that a patent pendingrelating to a standing wheelchair is his individual property and that he may independently engage in the development of a standing wheelchair. Theagreement also provides that we and any of our affiliates or successors have the royalty-free right to the exclusive use in the field of exoskeletons of anyintellectual property developed by Dr. Goffer, alone or jointly with others (whether or not as part of the development of a standing wheelchair and whether ornot developed through a company), while he is our employee, consultant or board member and for three years thereafter. Mr. Goffer retired from serving as ourPresident and Chief Technology Officer on November 18, 2015, and as a member of our board of directors on December 3, 2015. For more information, see“Part III. Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.”We cannot be sure that our intellectual property will provide us with a competitive advantage or that we will not infringe on the intellectualproperty rights of others. In addition, we cannot be sure that any patents will be granted in a timely manner or at all with respect to any of our patent pendingapplications. For a more comprehensive discussion of the risks related to our intellectual property, see Item 1A. “Risk Factors—Risks Related to OurIntellectual Property.”Government RegulationU.S. RegulationOur medical products and manufacturing operations are subject to regulation by the FDA and other federal and state agencies. Our products areregulated as medical devices in the United States under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, or the FFDCA, as implemented and enforced by the FDA.The FDA regulates the development, testing, manufacturing, labeling, storage, installation, servicing, advertising, promotion, marketing, distribution, import,export, and market surveillance of our medical devices.9Premarket RegulationUnless an exemption applies, each medical device commercially distributed in the United States requires either a substantial equivalencedetermination under a 510(k) premarket notification submission, or an approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). Under the FFDCA, medicaldevices are classified into one of three classes—Class I, Class II or Class III—depending on the degree of risk associated with each medical device and theextent of control needed to provide reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness. Classification of a device is important because the class to which adevice is assigned determines, among other things, the necessity and type of FDA review required prior to marketing the device. Class I devices are those forwhich reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness can be assured by adherence to general controls that include compliance with the applicable portionsof the FDA’s Quality System Regulation, or QSR, facility registration and product listing, reporting of adverse medical events, and appropriate, truthful andnon-misleading labeling, advertising, and promotional materials. Class I also includes devices for which there is insufficient information to determine thatgeneral controls are sufficient to provide reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device or to establish special controls to provide suchassurance, but that are not life-supporting or life-sustaining or for a use which is of substantial importance in preventing impairment of human health, andthat do not present a potential unreasonable risk of illness of injury.Class II devices are those for which general controls alone are insufficient to provide reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness and there issufficient information to establish “special controls.” These special controls can include performance standards, postmarket surveillance, patient registriesand FDA guidance documents. While most Class I devices are exempt from the 510(k) premarket notification requirement, only about 60 types of Class IIdevices are exempt from premarket notification. As a result, manufacturers of most Class II devices are required to submit to the FDA premarket notificationsunder Section 510(k) of the FFDCA requesting classification of their devices in order to market or commercially distribute those devices. To obtain a 510(k),a substantial equivalence determination for their devices, manufacturers must submit to the FDA premarket notifications demonstrating that the proposeddevice is “substantially equivalent” to a predicate device already on the market. A predicate device is a legally marketed device that is not subject topremarket approval, or PMA, meaning, (i) a device that was legally marketed prior to May 28, 1976 (pre-amendments device) and for which a PMA is notrequired, (ii) a device that has been reclassified from Class III to Class II or I, or (iii) a device that was found substantially equivalent through the 510(k)process. If the FDA agrees that the device is substantially equivalent to a predicate device currently on the market, it will grant 510(k) clearance tocommercially market the device. If the device is not “substantially equivalent” to a previously cleared device, the device is automatically a Class III device.The device sponsor must then fulfill more rigorous premarket approval requirements, or can request a risk-based classification determination for the device inaccordance with the “de novo” process, which is a route to market for medical devices that are low to moderate risk, but are not substantially equivalent to apredicate device.Devices that are intended to be life sustaining or life supporting, devices that are implantable, devices that present a potential unreasonable risk ofharm or are of substantial importance in preventing impairment of health, and devices that are not substantially equivalent to a predicate device are placed inClass III and generally require approval of a PMA, unless the device is a pre-amendment device not yet subject to a regulation requiring premarket approval.The PMA process is more demanding than the 510(k) premarket notification process. In a PMA, the manufacturer must demonstrate that the device is safe andeffective, and the PMA must be supported by extensive data, including data from preclinical studies and clinical trials. The PMA must also contain a fulldescription of the device and its components, a full description of the methods, facilities and controls used for manufacturing, and proposed labeling.Following receipt of a PMA, the FDA determines whether the application is sufficiently complete to permit a substantive review. If the FDA accepts theapplication for review, it has 180 days under the FFDCA to complete its review of a PMA, although in practice, the FDA’s review often takes significantlylonger, and can take up to several years.Clinical trials are almost always required to support PMAs and are sometimes required to support 510(k) submissions. All clinical investigations ofdevices to determine safety and effectiveness must be conducted in accordance with the FDA’s investigational device exemption, or IDE, regulations thatgovern investigational device labeling, prohibit promotion of the investigational device, and specify recordkeeping, reporting and monitoringresponsibilities of study sponsors and study investigators. If the device presents a “significant risk,” as defined by the FDA, the agency requires the devicesponsor to submit an IDE application to the FDA, which must become effective prior to commencing human clinical trials. The IDE will automaticallybecome effective 30 days after receipt by the FDA, unless the FDA denies the application or notifies the company that the investigation is on hold and maynot begin. If the FDA determines that there are deficiencies or other concerns with an IDE that requires modification, the FDA may permit a clinical trial toproceed under a conditional approval. In addition, the study must be approved by, and conducted under the oversight of, an Institutional Review Board, orIRB, for each clinical site. If the device presents a non-significant risk to the patient, a sponsor may begin the clinical trial after obtaining approval for thetrial by one or more IRBs without separate approval from the FDA, but must still comply with abbreviated IDE requirements, such as monitoring theinvestigation, ensuring that the investigators obtain informed consent, and labeling and record-keeping requirements.10In June 2014, the FDA granted our petition for “de novo” classification, which provides a route to market for medical devices that are low tomoderate risk, but are not substantially equivalent to a predicate device, and classified ReWalk as Class II subject to special controls. The ReWalk isintended to enable individuals with spinal cord injuries to perform ambulatory functions under supervision of a specially trained companion, and insiderehabilitation institutions. The special controls established in the de novo order include the following: compliance with medical device consensus standards;clinical testing to demonstrate safe and effective use considering the level of supervision necessary and the use environment; non-clinical performancetesting, including durability testing to demonstrate that the device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use; a training program; and labelingrelated to device use and user training. The special controls of this de novo order also apply to competing products seeking FDA clearance. For moreinformation, see Part I. Item 1. Risk Factors-Risks Related to Government Regulation-We are subject to extensive governmental regulations relating to themanufacturing, labeling and marketing of our products, and a failure to comply with such regulations could lead to withdrawal or recall of our products fromthe market.Postmarket RegulationAfter a device is cleared for marketing, and prior to marketing, numerous regulatory requirements apply. These include:•establishment registration and device listing;•development of a quality assurance system, including establishing and implementing procedures to design and manufacture devices;•labeling regulations that prohibit the promotion of products for unapproved or “off-label” uses and impose other restrictions on labeling; and•medical device reporting regulations that require manufacturers to report to the FDA if a device may have caused or contributed to a death orserious injury or malfunctioned in a way that would likely cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if it were to recur; and corrections andremoval reporting regulations that require manufacturers report to the FDA field corrections and product recalls or removals if undertaken toreduce a risk to health posed by the device or to remedy a violation of the FFDCA that may present a risk to health.Our manufacturing processes are required to comply with the applicable portions of the Quality System Regulation that covers the methods and thefacilities and controls for the design, manufacture, testing, production, processes, controls, quality assurance, labeling, packaging, distribution, installationand servicing of finished devices intended for human use. We actively maintain compliance with the FDA’s Quality System Regulation, 21 CFR Part 820,and the European Union’s Quality Management Systems requirements, ISO 13485:2003.As a manufacturer, we are subject to periodic scheduled or unscheduled inspections by the FDA. If the FDA believes we or any of our contractmanufacturers are not in compliance with the quality system requirements, or other postmarket requirements, it has significant enforcement authority.Specifically, if the FDA determines that we failed to comply with applicable regulatory requirements, it can take a variety of compliance or enforcementactions, which may result in any of the following sanctions:•untitled letters, warning letters, fines, injunctions, consent decrees and civil penalties;•customer notifications or repair, replacement or refunds;•recalls, withdrawals, or administrative detention or seizure of our products;•operating restrictions or partial suspension or total shutdown of production;•refusing or delaying requests for 510(k) marketing clearance or approval of pre-market approval applications relating to new products ormodified products;•reclassifying a 510(k) cleared device or withdrawing PMA approval;•refusal to grant export approvals for our products; or•pursuing criminal prosecution.Any such action by the FDA would have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, these regulatory controls, as well as any changes inFDA policies, can affect the time and cost associated with the development, introduction and continued availability of new products. Where possible, weanticipate these factors in our product development processes.11Regulation outside of the U.S.In addition to regulations in the United States, we are subject to a variety of foreign regulations governing clinical trials and commercial sales anddistribution of our products. In particular, we are subject to regulation in the E.U., which has directives and standards regulating the design, manufacture,clinical trials, labeling and adverse event reporting for medical devices. Devices that comply with the requirements of a relevant directive are entitled to bearthe CE conformity marking, indicating that the device conforms to the essential requirements of the applicable directive and, accordingly, can becommercially distributed throughout Europe. The method of assessing conformity varies depending on the class of the product, but normally involves acombination of self-assessment by the manufacturer and a third party assessment by a “Notified Body.” This third party assessment may consist of an audit ofthe manufacturer’s quality system or specific testing of the manufacturer’s product. We comply with the E.U. requirements and have received the CE mark forall of our ReWalk systems distributed in the E.U.Foreign sales outside of the E.U. are subject to the foreign government regulations of the relevant jurisdiction, and we must obtain approval by theappropriate regulatory authorities before we can commence clinical trials or marketing activities in those countries. The approval process varies from countryto country, and the time may be longer or shorter than that required to obtain a marketing authorization in the Unites States or the E.U. The requirementsgoverning the conduct of clinical trials, product licensing, pricing and reimbursement vary greatly from country to country.The policies of the FDA and foreign regulatory authorities may change and additional government regulations may be enacted that could prevent ordelay regulatory approval of our products and could also increase the cost of regulatory compliance. We cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent ofadverse governmental regulation that might arise from future legislative or administrative action, either in the United States or abroad.U.S. Anti-kickback, False Claims and Other Healthcare Fraud and Abuse LawsIn the United States, there are federal and state anti-kickback laws that prohibit the payment or receipt of kickbacks, bribes or other remunerationintended to induce the purchase or recommendation of healthcare products and services. Violations of these laws can lead to civil and criminal penalties,including exclusion from participation in federal healthcare programs. These laws apply to manufacturers of products, such as us, with respect to our financialrelationship with hospitals, physicians and other potential purchasers or acquirers of our products. The U.S. government has published regulations thatidentify “safe harbors” or exemptions for certain practices from enforcement actions under the federal anti-kickback statute, and we will seek to comply withthe safe harbors where possible. To qualify for a safe harbor, the activity must fit squarely within the safe harbor. Arrangements that do not meet a safe harborare not necessarily illegal, but must be evaluated on a case by case basis. Other provisions of state and federal law provide civil and criminal penalties forpresenting, or causing to be presented, to third-party payers for reimbursement claims that are false or fraudulent, or for items or services that were notprovided as claimed. False claims allegations under federal and some state laws may be brought on behalf of the government by private persons,“whistleblowers,” who then receive a share of any recovery.The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Affordability Reconciliation Act, or collectively, thePPACA, among other things, amends the intent requirement of the federal anti-kickback and criminal healthcare fraud statutes. A person or entity no longerneeds to have actual knowledge of these statutes or specific intent to violate them. In addition, the PPACA provides that the government may assert that aclaim that includes items or services resulting from a violation of the federal anti-kickback statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of theFalse Claims Act. The PPACA also imposes new reporting and disclosure requirements on device manufacturers for any “transfer of value” made ordistributed to physicians and teaching hospitals. Device manufacturers will also be required to report and disclose any investment interests held byphysicians and their immediate family members during the preceding calendar year. A number of provisions of PPACA also reflect increased focus on andfunding of healthcare fraud enforcement.Recently, the U.S. House of Representatives and Senate passed legislation, which, if signed into law, would repeal certain aspects of the PPACA.Further, on January 20, 2017, U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive order directing federal agencies with authorities and responsibilities underthe PPACA to waive, defer, grant exemptions from, or delay the implementation of any provision of the PPACA that would impose a fiscal or regulatoryburden on states, individuals, healthcare providers, health insurers, or manufacturers of pharmaceuticals or medical devices. Congress also could considersubsequent legislation to replace elements of the PPACA that are repealed. Thus, in light of the stated policies of the new U.S. presidential administration,there is uncertainty with respect to the impact, if any, on the provisions of the PPACA affecting us. While any legislative and regulatory changes will likelytake time to develop, and may or may not have an impact on the regulatory regime to which we are subject, we cannot predict the ultimate content, timing oreffect of any healthcare reform legislation or the impact of potential legislation on us.12Environmental MattersWe are subject to various environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, including those governing air emissions, water and wastewaterdischarges, noise emissions, the use, transport, management and disposal of chemicals and hazardous materials, the import, export and registration ofchemicals, and the cleanup of contaminated sites. Based on information currently available to us, we do not expect environmental costs and contingencies tohave a material adverse effect on us. The operation of our business and facilities, however, entails risks in these areas. Significant expenditures could berequired in the future to comply with environmental or health and safety laws, regulations or requirements.In Israel, where our contract manufacturer produces all of our products, businesses storing or using certain hazardous materials (including materialsnecessary for our manufacturing process) are required, pursuant to the Israeli Dangerous Substances Law 5753-1993, to obtain a toxin permit from theMinistry of Environmental Protection.In the European marketplace, electrical and electronic equipment is required to comply with the Directive on Waste Electrical and ElectronicEquipment, which aims to prevent waste by encouraging reuse and recycling, and the Directive on Restriction of Use of Certain Hazardous Substances, whichrestricts the use of six hazardous substances in electrical and electronic products. Our products and certain components of such products “put on the market”in the EU (whether or not manufactured in the EU) are subject to these directives. Additionally, we are required to comply with certain laws, regulations anddirectives, including the Toxic Substances Control Act in the United States and REACH in the EU, governing chemicals. These and similar laws andregulations require the testing, reporting and registration of certain chemicals we use and ship. We believe we are in compliance in all material respects withapplicable environmental laws and regulations.ManufacturingReWalk includes off-the-shelf and custom-made components produced to our specifications by various third parties, for technical and costeffectiveness. We have contracted with Sanmina Corporation ("Sanmina"), a well-established contract manufacturer with expertise in the medical deviceindustry, for the manufacture of all of our products. Pursuant to this contract, Sanmina manufactures ReWalk at its facility in Ma’alot, Israel. All ReWalkPersonal units are manufactured pursuant to the same set of specifications, and all ReWalk Rehabilitation units are manufactured pursuant to another set. Weplace our manufacturing orders with Sanmina pursuant to purchase orders or by providing forecasts for future requirements. We may terminate ourrelationship with Sanmina at any time upon written notice. Either we or Sanmina may terminate the relationship in the event of a material breach, subject to a30-day cure period. Our agreement with Sanmina contains a limitation on liability that applies equally to both us and Sanmina.We believe that this relationship allows us to operate our business efficiently by focusing our internal efforts on the development of our technologyand our products and provides us with substantial scale-up capacity. We regularly test quality on-site at Sanmina’s facility and we obtain full qualityinspection reports. We maintain a non-disclosure agreement with Sanmina.We develop certain of the software components internally and license other software components that are generally available for commercial use asopen source software.We manufacture products based upon internal sales forecasts. We deliver products to customers and distributors based upon purchase ordersreceived, and our goal is to fulfill each customer’s order for products in regular production within two weeks of receipt of the order.SuppliersWe have contracted with Sanmina for the sourcing of all components and raw materials necessary for the manufacture of our products. Componentsof our products and raw materials come from suppliers in Europe, China and Israel, and we depend on certain of these components and raw materials,including certain electronic parts, for the manufacture of our products. To date, we have not experienced significant volatility in the prices of thesecomponents and raw materials. However, such prices are subject to a number of factors, including purchase volumes, general economic conditions, currencyexchange rates, industry cycles, production levels and scarcity of supply.We believe that our and Sanmina’s facilities, our contracted manufacturing arrangement, and our supply arrangements are sufficient to support ourpotential capacity needs for the foreseeable future.13EmployeesAs of December 31, 2016, we had 94 employees (including full-time and hourly employees), of whom 36 are located in the United States, 41 werelocated in Israel and 17 were located in Germany. As of December 31, 2015, we had 87 employees, of whom 32 were located in the United States, 39 werelocated in Israel and 16 are located in Germany, and as of December 31, 2014, we had 66 employees, of whom 20 were located in the United States, 33 werelocated in Israel and 13 were located in Germany. The majority of our employees are, and have been, engaged in sales and marketing and research anddevelopment activities. We do not employ a significant number of temporary or part time employees. In early January 2017 we announced our plans toreduce our operating expenses by up to 30% and therefore the total number of employees remaining after the finalizing the process is 70 worldwide.We are subject to Israeli labor laws and regulations with respect to our employees located in Israel. These laws and regulations principally concernmatters such as pensions, paid annual vacation, paid sick days, length of the workday and work week, minimum wages, overtime pay, insurance for work-related accidents, severance pay and other conditions of employment. Our employees are not represented by a labor union. We consider our relationship withour employees to be good. To date, we have not experienced any work stoppages.The employees of our U.S. and German subsidiaries are subject to local labor laws and regulations.Financial Information about Geographic Areas and Significant Customer InformationThe following table sets forth the geographical breakdown of our revenues for each of the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, 2014: Year Ended December 31, 2016 2015 2014Revenues based on customer’s location: Israel$— $— $—United States3,741 2,439 2,186Europe1,144 820 1,254Asia-Pacific984 487 511 Total revenues$5,869 $3,746 $3,951Additional discussion of financial information by reportable segment and geographic area and sales in excess of 10% of total revenues to certain of ourcustomers is contained in Note 12 to our consolidated financial statements set forth in “Part II. Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of thisannual report.14Table of ContentsITEM 1A. RISK FACTORSOur business faces significant risks. You should carefully consider all of the information set forth in this annual report and in our other filings withthe United States Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, including the following risk factors which we face and which are faced by our industry.Our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected by any of these risks. In that event, the trading priceof our ordinary shares would likely decline and you might lose all or part of your investment. This report also contains forward-looking statements thatinvolve risks and uncertainties. Our results could materially differ from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements, as a result of certain factorsincluding the risks described below and elsewhere in this report and our other SEC filings. See also “Special Note Regarding Forward-LookingStatements” on page (iii).Risks Related to Our Business and Our Industry We rely on sales of our ReWalk systems and related service contracts and extended warranties for our revenue, and we may not be able to achieve ormaintain market acceptance or to generate sufficient revenues from such contracts. We currently rely, and in the future will rely, on sales of our ReWalk systems and related service contracts and extended warranties for our revenue.We have sold only a limited number of ReWalk systems, and market acceptance and adoption depend on educating people with limited upright mobility andhealth care providers as to the distinct features, ease-of-use, positive lifestyle impact and other benefits of ReWalk compared to alternative technologies andtreatments. ReWalk may not be perceived to have sufficient potential benefits compared with these alternatives. Users may also choose other therapies due todisadvantages of ReWalk, including the time it takes for a user to put on ReWalk, the slower pace of ReWalk compared to a wheelchair, the weight ofReWalk when carried, which makes it more burdensome for a companion to transport than a wheelchair, and the requirement that users be accompanied by atrained companion. Also, we believe that healthcare providers tend to be slow to change their medical treatment practices because of perceived liability risksarising from the use of new products and the uncertainty of third-party reimbursement. Accordingly, healthcare providers may not recommend ReWalk untilthere is sufficient evidence to convince them to alter the treatment methods they typically recommend, such as prominent healthcare providers or other keyopinion leaders in the spinal cord injury community recommending ReWalk as effective in providing identifiable immediate and long-term health benefits. In addition, while several private insurers in the United States have provided reimbursement for ReWalk in certain cases to date, health insurancecompanies and other third-party payors in the future may not deliver adequate coverage or reimbursement for our products. The VA may also cancel ormaterially curtail its current policy of providing coverage in the United States for qualifying individuals who have suffered spinal cord injury, or we may notplace enough units through the VA to make our sales profitable under the VA policy. Additionally, any future government measures to restrict healthcarespending could limit or eliminate our ability to provide products to, and gain revenues from, the VA. We may be unable to sell ReWalk systems on aprofitable basis if third-party payors deny coverage, limit reimbursement or reduce their levels of payment, or if our costs of production increase faster thanincreases in reimbursement levels. In addition, we may not obtain coverage and reimbursement approvals in a timely manner. Our failure to receive suchapprovals would negatively impact market acceptance of ReWalk. Achieving and maintaining market acceptance of ReWalk could be negatively impacted by many other factors, including, but not limited to:•lack of sufficient evidence supporting the benefits of ReWalk over competitive products or other available treatment, or lifestyle management,methodologies;•results of clinical studies relating to ReWalk or similar products;•claims that ReWalk, or any component thereof, infringes on patent or other intellectual property rights of third-parties;•perceived risks associated with the use of ReWalk or similar products or technologies;•the introduction of new competitive products or greater acceptance of competitive products;•adverse regulatory or legal actions relating to ReWalk or similar products or technologies; and•problems arising from the outsourcing of our manufacturing capabilities, or our existing manufacturing and supply relationships.15Table of Contents Any factors that negatively impact sales of ReWalk would adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.We have concluded that there are substantial doubts as to our ability to continue as a going concern.We have incurred accumulated losses in the amount of $106.5 million as of December 31, 2016 and further losses are anticipated in the developmentof our business. Those factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The ability to continue as a going concernis dependent upon the Company obtaining the necessary financing to meet its obligations and repay its liabilities arising from normal business operationswhen they come due. The Company intends to finance operating costs over the next twelve months with existing cash on hand, reducing operating spend,issuances under the Company's ATM Offering Program, other future issuances of equity and debt securities, or through a combination of the foregoing. Thefinancial statements have been prepared assuming that we will continue to operate as a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and thesatisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. Our auditors also included an explanatory paragraph to their audit opinion relating to ouraccompanying consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 regarding the substantial doubts about the Company's abilityto continue as a going concern.If we cannot raise the required funds on acceptable terms, we may be forced to substantially curtail our current operations or cease operationsaltogether. Further, external perceptions regarding our ability to continue as a going concern may make it more difficult for us to obtain financing for thecontinuation of our operations or require us to obtain financing on terms that are more favorable to investors, and could result in the loss of confidence byinvestors and suppliers. As such, our failure to continue as a going concern could harm our business, operating results and financial position and severelyaffect the value of your investment.We may not have sufficient funds to meet certain future capital requirements, which could impair our efforts to develop and commercialize existing andnew products. Future equity financings or borrowings may also dilute our shareholders or place us under restrictive covenants limiting our ability tooperate.Our ability to continue as a going concern depends upon our obtaining the necessary financing to meet our obligations and timely repay ourliabilities arising from normal business operations. We intend to finance operating costs over the next 12 months with existing cash on hand, issuances underour ATM Offering Program or other future issuances of equity and debt securities or through a combination of the foregoing. We are party to a loanagreement, dated December 30, 2015 (the Loan Agreement), with Kreos Capital V (Expert Fund) Limited (Kreos), providing us a line of credit in the amountof $20.0 million. As of December 31, 2016 we had drawn down the full $20.0 million under the Loan Agreement, consisting of borrowings of $12.0 millionon January 4, 2016 and $8.0 million on December 28, 2016 at an interest rate of 10.75%. We also issued to Kreos a warrant to purchase up to 119,295 of ourordinary shares at an exercise price of $9.64 per share. Pursuant to our ATM Offering Program, we may offer and sell from time to time ordinary shares with anaggregate offering price of up to $25 million pursuant to an equity distribution agreement with Piper Jaffray & Co. dated May 10, 2016. As of December 31,2016, we had sold 692,062 ordinary shares under our ATM Offering Program, resulting in net proceeds of $4.1 million, after deducting commissions, fees andexpenses. On November 1, 2016, we closed a separate follow-on public offering of 3,250,000 units, each consisting of one ordinary share and 0.75 of awarrant to purchase one ordinary share. We raised approximately $11.1 million from this offering, after deducting commissions, fees and expenses, and planto use the ATM Offering Program opportunistically now that the lock-up period has expired for the underwriting agreement for the November follow-onoffering.We may need to seek additional sources of financing if we require more funds than anticipated during the next twelve months or in later periods,including if we cannot make our loan repayments under our Loan Agreement with Kreos, or if we cannot raise sufficient funds from equity issuances, such asthe ATM Offering Program. Depending on the circumstances, this could potentially require us to borrow additional funds, sell or license our assets or selladditional equity securities in private placements or public offerings to pursue strategic transactions, such as the sale of our business or all or substantially allof our assets. Moreover, even if we believe we have sufficient funds for our current or future operating plans, we may choose to raise additional capital due tomarket conditions or strategic considerations. Any sale of additional equity may result in dilution to our shareholders and agreements governing anyborrowing arrangement may also contain covenants that could restrict our operations. If we are unable to obtain additional funds on reasonable terms, ourbusiness and results of operations could be materially harmed. The market for medical exoskeletons is new and unproven, and important assumptions about the potential market for our products may be inaccurate. The market for medical exoskeletons is new and unproven. Accordingly, it is difficult to predict the future size and rate of growth of the market. Wecannot be certain whether the market will continue to develop or if medical exoskeletons will achieve and sustain a level of market acceptance and demandsufficient for us to continue to generate revenue and achieve profitability. 16Table of ContentsWe obtained FDA clearance for our ReWalk Personal device in June 2014. This clearance permits us to market the device for use by individuals withspinal cord injury at levels T7 to L5 and for use by individuals in rehabilitation institutions with spinal cord injury at levels T4 to L5. The FDA’s clearancerequires users of the device to meet the following criteria: healthy hands and shoulders that can support crutches, healthy bone density, no skeletal fractures,in good general health, ability to stand with a stander device, weight of less than 220 pounds/100 kilograms and height between 5 feet 3 inches and 6 feet 2inches/1.60 meters and 1.88 meters. Additionally, the FDA clearance contraindicates psychiatric or cognitive conditions that could interfere with a user’sproper operation of the device and various other clinical conditions, including pregnancy, severe concurrent medical diseases, a history of severeneurological injuries other than spinal cord injury, impaired joint mobility, unhealed limbs or pelvic fractures or unstable spine, severe spasticity andsignificant and chronic loss of joint mobility due to structural changes in non-bony tissue. Future products for those with paraplegia or other mobilityimpairments or spinal cord injuries may have the same or other restrictions. Our business strategy is based, in part, on our estimates of the number of mobility impaired individuals and the incurrence of spinal cord injuries inour target markets and the percentage of those groups that would be able to use our current and future products. Limited sources exist to obtain reliablemarket data with respect to the number of mobility-impaired individuals and the incurrence of spinal cord injuries in our target markets. In addition, there areno third-party reports or studies regarding what percentage of those with limited mobility or spinal cord injuries would be able to use exoskeletons, ingeneral, or our current or planned future products, in particular. Our assumptions may be inaccurate and may change. The NSCISC estimates that as of 2016 there were 282,000 people in the United States living with SCI, and that the annual incidence of SCI cases isapproximately 17,000 new cases per year. Based on information from a 2015 report by the NSCISC, 41.1% of the total U.S. population of SCI patientssuffered injuries between levels T4 and L5. Three published ReWalk trials with respect to such eligible SCI patients had an aggregate screening acceptancerate of 79% considering all current FDA limitations, resulting in an estimated 33% of the total population of SCI patents being candidates for current ReWalkproducts. For more information on our expectations regarding these plans, see “-Our future growth and operating results will depend on our ability to developand commercialize new products and penetrate new markets” below. We cannot assure you that our estimate regarding our current products is accurate or that our estimate regarding future products will remain the same.FDA clearance for such products, if received at all, may contain different limitations from the ones the FDA has placed on the devices we currently market forparaplegia patients. If our estimates of our current or future addressable market are incorrect, our business may not develop as we expect and the price of oursecurities may suffer. We may fail to secure or maintain adequate insurance coverage or reimbursement for ReWalk by third-party payors, including the VA, which risk may beheightened if insurers find ReWalk to be investigational or experimental or if new government regulations change existing reimbursement policies.Additionally, such coverage or reimbursement, even if maintained, may not produce revenues that are high enough to allow us to sell our productsprofitably. We expect that in the future a significant source of payment for ReWalk systems will be private insurance plans and managed care programs,government programs such as the VA, Medicare and Medicaid, worker’s compensation and other third-party payors. In December 2015, the VA issued anational reimbursement policy for the ReWalk system, which entails the evaluation, training and procurement of ReWalk Personal exoskeleton systems forall qualifying veterans across the United States. However, no broad uniform policy of coverage and reimbursement for electronic exoskeleton medicaltechnology exists among third-party payors in the United States or elsewhere, although reimbursement may be achieved on a case-by-case basis. To date,payments for our products have been made primarily through case-by-case determinations by third-party payors (including several private insurers in theUnited States), by self-payors and, to a lesser extent, through the use of funds from insurance and/or accident settlements. Generally, private insurance companies do not cover or provide reimbursement for any medical exoskeleton products for personal use, includingReWalk Personal, and may ultimately provide no coverage at all. Additionally, there is limited clinical data related to ReWalk, and third-party payors mayconsider use of ReWalk to be experimental and therefore refuse to cover it. For example, Aetna has determined that certain lower-limb prostheses, includingReWalk, are experimental and investigational because there is inadequate evidence of their effectiveness. Additionally, the majority of independent medicalreview decisions made following the denial of ReWalk coverage have determined that ReWalk is experimental and/or investigational, citing a lack ofclinical data. 17Table of ContentsMany private third-party payors use coverage decisions and payment amounts determined by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services, or theCMS, which administers the Medicare program, as guidelines in setting their coverage and reimbursement policies. In the future, we intend to pursuereimbursement coverage from CMS. While we believe that a positive response from CMS will broaden coverage by private insurers, we expect that it couldtake three to five years to receive a decision from CMS. Even with a positive decision from CMS regarding ReWalk Personal, future action by CMS or othergovernment agencies may diminish possible payments to physicians, outpatient centers and/or hospitals that purchase ReWalk Rehabilitation, and possiblepayments to individuals who purchase ReWalk Personal. Additionally, a decision by CMS to provide reimbursement could influence other payors, includingprivate insurers. If CMS declines to provide for reimbursements of ReWalk or if its reimbursement price is lower than that of other payors, ReWalk may not bereimbursed at a cost-effective level or at all. Those private third-party payors that do not follow the Medicare guidelines may adopt different coverage andreimbursement policies for purchase of ReWalk, or use of ReWalk Rehabilitation at a hospital or rehabilitation center. In addition, we expect that thepurchase of ReWalk Rehabilitation systems will require the approval of senior management at hospitals or rehabilitation facilities, inclusion in the hospitals’or rehabilitation facilities’ budget process for capital expenditures, and in the case of ReWalk Personal, fundraising and financial planning or assistance. Third-party payors are developing increasingly sophisticated methods of controlling healthcare costs. These cost control methods includeprospective payment systems, capitated rates, benefit redesigns and an exploration of other cost-effective methods of delivering healthcare. These costcontrol methods potentially limit the amount that healthcare providers may be willing to pay for electronic exoskeleton medical technology, if they providecoverage at all. We may be unable to sell ReWalk systems on a profitable basis if third-party payors deny coverage or provide insufficient levels ofreimbursement.Future legislation could result in modifications to the existing public and private health care insurance systems that would have a material adverseeffect on the reimbursement policies discussed above. It is uncertain what impact the new U.S. presidential administration will have on healthcare spending.If enacted and implemented, any measures to restrict health care spending could result in decreased revenue from our products and decrease potential returnsfrom our research and development initiatives.We have a limited operating history upon which you can evaluate our business plan and prospects. Although we were incorporated in 2001, we did not begin selling ReWalk Rehabilitation until 2011, and we did not begin selling ReWalk Personalin Europe until 2012. We began selling ReWalk Personal in the United States in the third quarter of 2014, as we received FDA clearance to do so in June2014. Therefore, we have limited operating history upon which you can evaluate our business plan and prospects. Our business plan and prospects must beconsidered in light of the potential problems, delays, uncertainties and complications encountered in connection with a more newly established business.The risks include, but are not limited to, that:•a market will not develop for our products;•we will not be able to develop scalable products and services, or that, although scalable, our products and services will not be economical to market;•we will not be able to establish brand recognition and competitive advantages for our products;•we will not receive necessary regulatory clearances or approvals for our products; and•our competitors market an equivalent or superior product or hold proprietary rights that preclude us from marketing our products. There are no assurances that we can successfully address these challenges. If we are unsuccessful, our business, financial condition and operatingresults could be materially and adversely affected.18Table of ContentsIf we are unable to leverage and expand our sales, marketing and training infrastructure, including in light of our announced plan to reduce corporatespending, we may fail to increase our sales. A key element of our long-term business strategy is the continued enhancement of our sales and marketing infrastructure, through the training,retaining and motivating of skilled sales and marketing representatives with industry experience and knowledge. In order to continue growing our businessefficiently, we must coordinate the development of this infrastructure with the timing of regulatory approvals, decisions regarding reimbursements, and otherfactors in various geographies. Managing and maintaining our sales and marketing infrastructure is expensive and time consuming, and an inability toleverage such an organization effectively, or in coordination with regulatory or other developments, could inhibit potential sales and the penetration andadoption of ReWalk into both existing and new markets. In addition, as previously announced, we have set a goal to reduce total operating expenses in 2017by up to 30% as compared to 2016, in part through a realignment of and reduction in staffing to match our 2017 business goals. As we move forward withthese plans, we intend to continue funding field sales, service and training efforts for our ReWalk products. However, certain decisions we make regardingstaffing in these areas in our efforts to decrease expenses could have unintended negative effects on our revenues, such as by weakening our salesinfrastructure and/or harming the quality of our customer service. Additionally, we expect to face significant challenges as we manage and continue to improve our sales and marketing infrastructure and work toretain the individuals who make up those networks. Newly hired sales representatives require training and take time to achieve full productivity. If we fail totrain new hires adequately, or if we experience high turnover in our sales force in the future, we cannot be certain that new hires will become as productive asmay be necessary to maintain or increase our sales. In addition, if we are not able to retain, subject to our plans to cut operating expenses, and continue torecruit our network of internal trainers, we may not be able to successfully train customers on the use of ReWalk, which could inhibit new sales and harm ourreputation. If we are unable to expand our sales, marketing and training capabilities, we may not be able to effectively commercialize ReWalk, or enhance thestrength of our brand, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results. The health benefits of ReWalk have not been substantiated by long-term clinical data, which could limit sales. Although study participants and other ReWalk users have reported the secondary health benefits such as a reduction in pain and spasticity,improved bowel and urinary tract functions and emotional and psychosocial benefits, among others, currently there is no conclusive clinical dataestablishing any secondary health benefits of ReWalk.As a result, potential customers and healthcare providers may be slower to adopt or recommend ReWalk and third-party payors may not be willing toprovide coverage or reimbursement for our products. In addition, future studies or clinical experience may indicate that treatment with our current or futureReWalk products is not superior to treatment with alternative products or therapies. Such results could slow the adoption of our products and significantlyreduce our sales. We depend on a single third party to manufacture ReWalk and a limited number of third-party suppliers for certain components of ReWalk. We have contracted with Sanmina Corporation, a well-established contract manufacturer with expertise in the medical device industry, for themanufacture of all of our products and the sourcing of all of our components and raw materials. Pursuant to this contract, Sanmina manufactures ReWalk,pursuant to our specifications, at its facility in Ma’alot, Israel. We may terminate our relationship with Sanmina at any time upon written notice. In addition,either we or Sanmina may terminate the relationship in the event of a material breach, subject to a 30-day cure period. For our business strategy to besuccessful, Sanmina must be able to manufacture our products in sufficient quantities, in compliance with regulatory requirements and quality controlstandards, in accordance with agreed upon specifications, at acceptable costs and on a timely basis. Increases in our product sales, whether forecasted orunanticipated, could strain the ability of Sanmina to manufacture an increasingly large supply of our current or future products in a manner that meets thesevarious requirements. In addition, although we are not restricted from engaging an alternative manufacturer, and have the capabilities to manufacture ReWalkin-house, the process of moving our manufacturing activities would be time consuming and costly, and may limit our ability to meet our sales commitments,which could harm our reputation and could have a material adverse effect on our business. We also rely on third-party suppliers, which contract directly with Sanmina, to supply certain components of ReWalk. Sanmina does not have long-term supply agreements with most of its suppliers and, in many cases, makes purchases on a purchase order basis. Sanmina’s ability to secure adequatequantities of such products may be limited. Suppliers may encounter problems that limit their ability to manufacture components for our products, includingfinancial difficulties or damage to their manufacturing equipment or facilities. If Sanmina fails to obtain sufficient quantities of high quality components tomeet demand on a timely basis, we could lose customer orders, our reputation may be harmed and our business could suffer. 19Table of ContentsSanmina generally uses a small number of suppliers for ReWalk. Depending on a limited number of suppliers exposes us to risks, including limitedcontrol over pricing, availability, quality and delivery schedules. If any one or more of our suppliers ceases to provide sufficient quantities of components ina timely manner or on acceptable terms, Sanmina would have to seek alternative sources of supply. It may be difficult to engage additional or replacementsuppliers in a timely manner. Failure of these suppliers to deliver products at the level our business requires would limit our ability to meet our salescommitments, which could harm our reputation and could have a material adverse effect on our business. Sanmina also may have difficulty obtaining similarcomponents from other suppliers that are acceptable to the FDA or other regulatory agencies, and the failure of Sanmina’s suppliers to comply with strictlyenforced regulatory requirements could expose us to regulatory action including warning letters, product recalls, termination of distribution, product seizuresor civil penalties. It could also require Sanmina to cease using the components, seek alternative components or technologies and we could be forced tomodify our products to incorporate alternative components or technologies, which could result in a requirement to seek additional regulatory approvals. Anydisruption of this nature or increased expenses could harm our commercialization efforts and adversely affect our operating results. Our future growth and operating results will depend on our ability to develop and commercialize new products and penetrate new markets. We are currently engaged in research and development efforts to address the needs of patients with mobility impairments besides paraplegia, such asstroke and multiple sclerosis, and, in the future, we plan to address these needs in elderly assistance and cerebral palsy. For more information, see Part I. Item1. Business - Future Products. In addition to other research and development projects, we collaborate with Harvard University’s Wyss Institute forBiologically Inspired Engineering to design, research and develop lightweight exoskeleton system technologies for lower limb disabilities intended to treatstroke, multiple sclerosis, mobility limitations for the elderly and other medical applications. As part of the collaboration, Harvard has also licensed to uscertain of its intellectual property relating to lightweight exoskeleton system technologies for lower limb disabilities. We are obligated to use commerciallyreasonable efforts to develop products under the license in accordance with an agreed-upon development plan and to introduce and market such productscommercially. We expect that a portion of our revenues will be derived, in the next few years, from new products we create for use by individuals suffering from astroke or multiple sclerosis, and, in later years, from other new products of ours aimed at addressing other medical indications which affect the ability to walk,including elderly assistance and cerebral palsy. As such, our future results will depend on our ability to successfully develop and commercialize such newproducts. We cannot ensure you that we will be able to introduce new products, products currently under development and products contemplated for futuredevelopment for additional indications in a timely manner, or at all. Harvard may also terminate its license agreement with us if we fail to obtain the requisiteinsurance, become insolvent or do not meet certain developmental milestones with respect to the products we develop using the patents licensed to us. Anysuch termination of this aspect of the collaboration with Harvard could impair our research and development efforts into lightweight exoskeleton systemtechnologies for lower limb disabilities. In addition, we may not be able to clinically demonstrate the medical benefits of our products for new indications,and we do not yet have any clinical data demonstrating the benefits of our products for indications other than paraplegia. We may also be unable to gainnecessary regulatory approvals to enable us to market new products for additional indications or the regulatory process may be more costly and timeconsuming than expected.Even if we are successful in the design and development of new products, our growth and results of operations will depend on our ability topenetrate new markets and gain acceptance by non-spinal cord injury markets such as the stroke and multiple sclerosis communities, and, in the longer term,elderly assist and cerebral palsy patients. We may not be able to gain such market acceptance in these communities in a timely manner, or at all. While our new products currently under development will share some aspects of the core technology platform in our current products, their designfeatures and components may differ from our current products. Accordingly, these products will also be subject to the risks described above under “-We relyon sales of our ReWalk systems and related service contracts and extended warranties for our revenue, and we may not be able to achieve or maintain marketacceptance or to generate sufficient revenues from such contracts.” To the extent we are unable to successfully develop and commercialize products toaddress indications other than paraplegia, we will not meet our projected results of operations and future growth. 20Table of ContentsWe operate in a competitive industry that is subject to rapid technological change, and we expect competition to increase. There are several other companies developing technology and devices that compete with ReWalk. Our principal competitors in the medicalexoskeleton market consist of Ekso Bionics, Parker Hannifin, Rex Bionics, Cyberdyne, and others. These companies have products currently available forinstitutional use and in some cases personal use. We expect some of such products to become available for personal use in the next few years. In addition, wecompete with alternative devices and alternative therapies, including treadmill-based gait therapies, such as those offered by Hocoma, AlterG, Aretech andReha Technology. These or other medical device or robotics companies, academic and research institutions, or others, may develop new technologies ortherapies that provide a superior walking experience, are more effective in treating the secondary medical conditions that we target or are less expensive thanReWalk or future products. Our technologies and products could be rendered obsolete by such developments. We may also compete with other treatmentsand technologies that address the secondary medical conditions that ReWalk seeks to mitigate. Our competitors may respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies, undertake more extensive marketing campaigns, have greaterfinancial, marketing and other resources than we do or may be more successful in attracting potential customers, employees and strategic partners. Inaddition, potential customers, such as hospitals and rehabilitation centers, could have long-standing or contractual relationships with competitors or othermedical device companies. Potential customers may be reluctant to adopt ReWalk, particularly if it competes with or has the potential to compete with ordiminish the need/utilization of products or treatments supported through these existing relationships. If we are not able to compete effectively, our businessand results of operations will be negatively impacted. In addition, because we operate in a new market, the actions of our competitors could adversely affect our business. Adverse events such as productdefects or legal claims with respect to competing or similar products could cause reputational harm to the exoskeleton market on the whole. Further, adverseregulatory findings or reimbursement-related decisions with respect to other exoskeleton products could negatively impact the entire market and,accordingly, our business. We have incurred net losses since our inception. We have experienced operating losses since our inception in 2001. We expect that we will continue to incur losses for the near term we continue tocommercialize our ReWalk systems and pursue certain research and development initiatives.Additionally, as a domestic Exchange Act reporting company, we have faced, and may continue to face, higher regulatory, compliance and financialcosts than those we incurred as a foreign private issuer due to the increased reporting requirements applicable to domestic issuers, and our general andadministrative expenses could increase.As previously announced, we have set a goal to reduce total operating expenses in 2017 by up to 30% as compared to 2016. These reductions willbe achieved through a combination of targeted savings: the completion of specific projects focused on quality improvement initiatives and efforts to reduceoverall product cost; a realignment of and reduction in staffing to match our 2017 business goals; and a reduction in other corporate spending. We intend tocontinue funding reimbursement efforts, clinical studies to expand data on the effectiveness of the SCI products, field sales, service and training efforts for theReWalk system and the commercialization pathway for the Stroke Softsuit program. However, if we are unable to cut expenses effectively and decrease ournet losses, or if we are otherwise unable to reduce our cash usage from operations, the value of your investment may be adversely affected. Our managementhas also concluded, and our auditors have added an explanatory paragraph to their audit opinion relating to our accompanying consolidated financialstatements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, that there is a substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.Our ability tocontinue as a going concern depends upon our accessing the necessary financing to meet our obligations and repay our liabilities arising from normalbusiness operations when they come due. If we cannot raise the required funds on acceptable terms, we may be forced to substantially curtail our currentoperations or to cease operations altogether. For more information, see -“ We have concluded that there are substantial doubts as to our ability to continue asa going concern.”21Table of ContentsIn the event that we default under the Loan Agreement with Kreos, Kreos could foreclose on its lien and take possession over all of our assets. On December 30, 2015, we entered into the Loan Agreement with Kreos, pursuant to which Kreos extended a line of credit to us in the amount of$20.0 million. On January 4, 2016, we drew down $12.0 million and on December 28, 2016, we drew down the remaining $8.0 million. The principal amountof each drawdown is repayable monthly over a period of 24 months commencing 12 months after the applicable drawdown date, which period will beextended to 36 months if we raise $20.0 million or more in connection with the issuance of shares of our capital stock (including debt convertible into sharesof our capital stock) before the respective 24-month period expires. Interest on each drawdown is payable monthly in arrears at a rate of 10.75% per year fromthe applicable drawdown date through the date on which all such principal is repaid. Pursuant to the Loan Agreement, we granted Kreos a first priority security interest over all of our assets, including intellectual property and equityinterests in our subsidiaries, subject to certain permitted security interests. For more information, see “Part II. Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysisof Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Liquidity and Capital Resources” and “Part II. Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data-Notesto Consolidated Financial Statements.” In the event that we are unable to make the interest payments when due under the Loan Agreement or to pay theoutstanding principal amount following the termination of the Loan Agreement, Kreos could take actions under the Loan Agreement and seek to takepossession of or sell our assets to satisfy our obligations thereunder. Any of these actions would have an immediate material adverse effect on our business,operating results and financial condition. We utilize independent distributors who are free to market products that compete with ReWalk. While we expect that the percentage of our sales generated from independent distributors will decrease over time as we continue to increase ourdirect sales efforts in the United States in response to the receipt of FDA clearance for ReWalk Personal, we believe that a meaningful percentage of our saleswill continue to be generated by independent distributors in the future. None of our independent distributors has been required to sell our productsexclusively. Our distributor agreements generally have one year initial terms and automatic renewals for an additional year. If any of our key independentdistributors were to cease to distribute our products, our sales could be adversely affected. In such a situation, we may need to seek alternative independentdistributors or increase our reliance on our other independent distributors or our direct sales representatives, which may not prevent our sales from beingadversely affected. Additionally, to the extent that we enter into additional arrangements with independent distributors to perform sales, marketing, ordistribution services, the terms of the arrangements could cause our product margins to be lower than if we directly marketed and sold our products. We are dependent on a single facility for the manufacturing and assembly of our products. All manufacturing and assembly of our products is conducted at a single facility of our contract manufacturer, Sanmina, located in Ma’alot, Israel.Accordingly, we are highly dependent on the uninterrupted and efficient operation of this facility. If operations at this facility were to be disrupted as a resultof equipment failures, earthquakes and other natural disasters, fires, accidents, work stoppages, power outages, acts of war or terrorism or other reasons, ourbusiness, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. In particular, this facility is located in the north of Israel withinrange of rockets that have from time to time been fired into the country during armed conflicts with Hezbollah in Lebanon. Although our manufacturing andassembly operations could be transferred elsewhere, either in-house or to an alternative Sanmina facility, the process of relocating these operations wouldcause delays in production. Lost sales or increased costs that we may experience during the disruption, or a forced relocation, of operations may not berecoverable under our insurance policies, and longer-term business disruptions could result in a loss of customers. If this were to occur, our business, financialcondition and operations could be materially negatively impacted. Additionally, our reliance on Sanmina as a contract manufacturer makes us vulnerable topossible capacity constraints and reduced control over component availability, delivery schedules, manufacturing yields and costs. We may receive a significant number of warranty claims or our ReWalk system may require significant amounts of service after sale. Sales of ReWalk generally include a two-year warranty for parts and services, other than for normal wear and tear. We also provide customers withthe option to purchase an extended warranty for up to an additional three years. If product returns or warranty claims are significant or exceed ourexpectations, we could incur unanticipated expenditures for parts and services, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results. 22Table of ContentsDefects in our products or the software that drives them could adversely affect the results of our operations. The design, manufacture and marketing of ReWalk involve certain inherent risks. Manufacturing or design defects, unanticipated use of ReWalk, orinadequate disclosure of risks relating to the use of ReWalk can lead to injury or other adverse events. In addition, because the manufacturing of our productsis outsourced to Sanmina, our original equipment manufacturer, we may not be aware of manufacturing defects that could occur. Such adverse events couldlead to recalls or safety alerts relating to ReWalk (either voluntary or required by the FDA or similar governmental authorities in other countries), and couldresult, in certain cases, in the removal of ReWalk from the market. A recall could result in significant costs. To the extent any manufacturing defect occurs,our agreement with Sanmina contains a limitation on Sanmina’s liability, and therefore we could be required to incur the majority of related costs. Productdefects or recalls could also result in negative publicity, damage to our reputation or, in some circumstances, delays in new product approvals. When an exoskeleton is used by a paralyzed individual to walk, the individual relies completely on the exoskeleton to hold him or her upright. Inaddition, ReWalk incorporates sophisticated computer software. Complex software frequently contains errors, especially when first introduced. Our softwaremay experience errors or performance problems in the future. If any part of ReWalk’s hardware or software were to fail, the user could experience death orserious injury. Additionally, users may not use ReWalk in accordance with safety protocols and training, which could enhance the risk of death or injury.Any such occurrence could cause delay in market acceptance of ReWalk, damage to our reputation, additional regulatory filings, product recalls, increasedservice and warranty costs, product liability claims and loss of revenue relating to such hardware or software defects. The medical device industry has historically been subject to extensive litigation over product liability claims. We have been, and anticipate that aspart of our ordinary course of business we may be, subject to product liability claims alleging defects in the design, manufacture or labeling of our products.A product liability claim, regardless of its merit or eventual outcome, could result in significant legal defense costs and high punitive damage payments.Although we maintain product liability insurance, the coverage is subject to deductibles and limitations, and may not be adequate to cover future claims.Additionally, we may be unable to maintain our existing product liability insurance in the future at satisfactory rates or adequate amounts. We may not be able to enhance our product offerings through our research and development efforts. In order to increase our sales and our market share in the exoskeleton market, we must enhance and broaden our research and development effortsand product offerings in response to the evolving demands of people with paraplegia or paralysis and healthcare providers, as well as competitivetechnologies. We are also currently involved in research and development efforts directed to the needs of patients with other mobility impairments, such asstroke and multiple sclerosis. In the future, we plan to address these needs in elderly assistance and cerebral palsy. We may not be successful in developing,obtaining regulatory approval for, or marketing our currently proposed products and products proposed to be created in the future. In addition,notwithstanding our market research efforts, our future products may not be accepted by consumers, their caregivers, healthcare providers or third-partypayors who reimburse consumers for our products. The success of any proposed product offerings will depend on numerous factors, including our ability to:•identify the product features that people with paraplegia or paralysis, their caregivers and healthcare providers are seeking in a medical device thatrestores upright mobility and successfully incorporate those features into our products;•develop and introduce proposed products in sufficient quantities and in a timely manner;•adequately protect our intellectual property and avoid infringing upon the intellectual property rights of third-parties;•demonstrate the safety, efficacy and health benefits of proposed products; and•obtain the necessary regulatory approvals for proposed products. If we fail to generate demand by developing products that incorporate features desired by consumers, their caregivers or healthcare providers, or ifwe do not obtain regulatory clearance or approval for proposed products in time to meet market demand, we may fail to generate sales sufficient to achieve ormaintain profitability. We have in the past experienced, and we may in the future experience, delays in various phases of product development, includingduring research and development, manufacturing, limited release testing, marketing and customer education efforts. Such delays could cause customers todelay or forgo purchases of our products, or to purchase our competitors’ products. Even if we are able to successfully develop proposed products whenanticipated, these products may not produce sales in excess of the costs of development, and they may be quickly rendered obsolete by changing consumerpreferences or the introduction by our competitors of products embodying new technologies or features. 23Table of ContentsThere is no long-term clinical data with respect to the effects of ReWalk, and our products could cause unforeseen negative effects. While short-term clinical studies have established the safety of ReWalk, there is no long-term clinical data with respect to the safety or physicaleffects of ReWalk. Future results and experience could indicate that our products are not safe for long-term use or cause unexpected complications or otherunforeseen negative effects. Because ReWalk users generally do not have feeling in their lower body, users may not immediately notice damaging effects,which could exacerbate their impact. If in the future ReWalk is shown to be unsafe or cause such unforeseen effects, we could be subject to mandatoryproduct recalls, suspension or withdrawal of FDA or other regulatory clearance or approval, significant legal liability or harm to our business reputation. We may enter into collaborations, in-licensing arrangements, joint ventures, strategic alliances or partnerships with third-parties that may not result in thedevelopment of commercially viable products or the generation of significant future revenues. In the ordinary course of our business, in the future we may enter into collaborations, in-licensing arrangements, joint ventures, strategic alliances orpartnerships to develop ReWalk and to pursue new markets. Proposing, negotiating and implementing collaborations, in-licensing arrangements, jointventures, strategic alliances or partnerships may be a lengthy and complex process. We may not identify, secure, or complete any such transactions orarrangements in a timely manner, on a cost-effective basis, on acceptable terms or at all. We have limited institutional knowledge and experience with respectto these business development activities, and we may also not realize the anticipated benefits of any such transaction or arrangement. In particular, thesecollaborations may not result in the development of products that achieve commercial success or result in significant revenues and could be terminated priorto developing any products. For example, we have entered into arrangements with Yaskawa for the distribution of our products in certain Asian markets. InMay 2016, we announced our collaboration with Harvard University’s Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering for the research, design,development and commercialization of lightweight exoskeleton system technologies for lower limb disabilities, aimed to treat stroke, multiple sclerosis,mobility limitations for the elderly and other medical applications. Our arrangements with Yaskawa and Harvard may not be as productive or successful as wehope. If we pursue collaborations, in-licensing arrangements, joint ventures, strategic alliances or partnerships, we may not be in a position to exercise soledecision making authority regarding the transaction or arrangement, which could create the potential risk of creating impasses on decisions, and ourcollaborators may have economic or business interests or goals that are, or that may become, inconsistent with our business interests or goals. It is possiblethat conflicts may arise with our collaborators. Our collaborators may act in their self-interest, which may be adverse to our best interest, and they may breachtheir obligations to us. Any such disputes could result in litigation or arbitration which would increase our expenses and divert the attention of ourmanagement. Further, these transactions and arrangements are contractual in nature and may be terminated or dissolved under the terms of the applicableagreements. Exchange rate fluctuations between the U.S. dollar, the Euro and the NIS may negatively affect our earnings. The U.S. dollar is our functional and reporting currency. In 2015 and 2016, most of our revenues were denominated in U.S. dollars and the remainderof our revenues was denominated in euros and British pound, and most of our expenses were denominated in U.S. dollars and the remainder of our expenseswere denominated in NIS and euros. Throughout 2017, we expect that the denominations of our revenues and expenses will be consistent with what weexperienced in 2016 and 2015. Accordingly, any appreciation of the NIS or Euro relative to the U.S. dollar would adversely impact our net loss or netincome, if any. For example, we are exposed to the risks that the shekel may appreciate relative to the dollar, or, if the shekel instead devalues relative to thedollar, that the inflation rate in Israel may exceed such rate of devaluation of the shekel, or that the timing of such devaluation may lag behind inflation inIsrael. In any such event, the dollar cost of our operations in Israel would increase and our dollar-denominated results of operations would be adverselyaffected.We cannot predict any future trends in the rate of inflation in Israel or the rate of devaluation (if any) of the shekel against the dollar. For example,while the shekel appreciated against the dollar at a rate of approximately 1.5% during the fiscal year of 2016, the rate of devaluation of the shekel against thedollar was approximately 0.3% and 12.0% in 2015 and 2014, respectively. In 2015 and 2014, this had the effect of increasing the dollar cost of ouroperations in Israel. If the dollar cost of our operations in Israel increases once again, our dollar-measured results of operations will be adversely affected. Ouroperations also could be adversely affected if we are unable to effectively hedge against currency fluctuations in the future. 24Table of ContentsWe have in the past engaged in limited hedging activities, and we may enter into other hedging arrangements with financial institutions from timeto time. Any hedging strategies that we may implement in the future to mitigate currency risks, such as forward contracts, options and foreign exchange swapsrelated to transaction exposures may not eliminate our exposure to foreign exchange fluctuations. For further information, see “Part II, Item 7A Quantitativeand Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” "The economic effects of Brexit may affect relationships with existing and future customers and could havean adverse impact on our business and operating results." below.The economic effects of "Brexit" may affect relationships with existing and future customers and could have an adverse impact on our business andoperating results. On June 23, 2016, the United Kingdom (the "U.K.") held a referendum in which voters approved an exit from the European Union ("E.U."),commonly referred to as "Brexit." On February 8, 2017, the U.K.’s House of Commons approved a bill authorizing the government to start exit talks with theEuropean Union. The impact on us from Brexit will depend, in part, on the outcome of tariff, trade, regulatory and other negotiations.As a result, the global markets and currencies have been adversely impacted, including a sharp decline in the value of the British pound as comparedto the U.S. dollar. A potential devaluation of the local currencies of our international buyers relative to the U.S. dollar may impair the purchasing power ofour international buyers and could cause international buyers to decrease their participation in our marketplaces or use of our services.Further, volatility in exchange rates resulting from Brexit is expected to continue in the short term as the U.K. negotiates its exit from the E.U. Wetranslate sales and other results denominated in foreign currency into U.S. dollars for our financial statements. During periods of a strengthening dollar, ourreported international sales and earnings could be reduced because foreign currencies may translate into fewer U.S. dollars.Finally, Brexit could lead to legal uncertainty and potentially divergent national laws and regulations as the U.K. determines which E.U. laws toreplace or replicate, and those laws and regulations may be cumbersome, difficult or costly in terms of compliance. Any of these effects of Brexit, amongothers, could adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows.We may seek to grow our business through acquisitions of complementary products or technologies, and the failure to manage acquisitions, or the failureto integrate them with our existing business, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results. From time to time, we may consider opportunities to acquire other products or technologies that may enhance our product platform or technology,expand the breadth of our markets or customer base, or advance our business strategies. Potential acquisitions involve numerous risks, including:•problems assimilating the acquired products or technologies;•issues maintaining uniform standards, procedures, controls and policies;•unanticipated costs associated with acquisitions;•diversion of management’s attention from our existing business;•risks associated with entering new markets in which we have limited or no experience; and•increased legal and accounting costs relating to the acquisitions or compliance with regulatory matters. We have no current commitments with respect to any acquisition. We do not know if we will be able to identify acquisitions we deem suitable,whether we will be able to successfully complete any such acquisitions on favorable terms or at all, or whether we will be able to successfully integrate anyacquired products or technologies. Our potential inability to integrate any acquired products or technologies effectively may adversely affect our business,operating results and financial condition. 25Table of ContentsIf there are significant disruptions in our information technology systems, our business, financial condition and operating results could be adverselyaffected. The efficient operation of our business depends on our information technology systems. We rely on our information technology systems toeffectively manage sales and marketing data, accounting and financial functions, inventory management, product development tasks, research anddevelopment data, customer service and technical support functions. Our information technology systems are vulnerable to damage or interruption fromearthquakes, fires, floods and other natural disasters, terrorist attacks, attacks by computer viruses or hackers, power losses, and computer system or datanetwork failures. In addition, our data management application is hosted by a third-party service provider whose security and information technologysystems are subject to similar risks, and ReWalk systems contain software which could be subject to computer virus or hacker attacks or other failures. The failure of our or our service providers’ information technology systems or ReWalk’s software to perform as we anticipate or our failure toeffectively implement new information technology systems could disrupt our entire operation or adversely affect our software products and could result indecreased sales, increased overhead costs, and product shortages, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, financialcondition and operating results. If we fail to properly manage our anticipated growth, our business could suffer. Our growth has placed, and we expect that it will continue to place, a significant strain on our management team and on our financial resources.Failure to manage our growth effectively could cause us to misallocate management or financial resources, and result in losses or weaknesses in ourinfrastructure, which could materially adversely affect our business. Additionally, our anticipated growth will increase the demands placed on our suppliers,resulting in an increased need for us to manage our suppliers and monitor for quality assurance. Any failure by us to manage our growth effectively couldhave an adverse effect on our ability to achieve our business objectives. We depend on the knowledge and skills of our senior management. We have benefited substantially from the leadership and performance of our senior management. For example, we depend on our Chief ExecutiveOfficer’s experience successfully scaling an early stage medical device company, as well as the experience of other members of management. Our success willdepend on our ability to retain our current management. Competition for senior management in our industry is intense and we cannot guarantee that we willbe able to retain our personnel. Additionally, we do not carry key man insurance on any of our current executive officers. The loss of the services of certainmembers of our senior management could prevent or delay the implementation and completion of our strategic objectives, or divert management’s attentionto seeking qualified replacements. We are subject to securities class action lawsuits against us that may result in an adverse outcome. Between September 2016 and January 2017, eight putative class actions on behalf of alleged shareholders that purchased or acquired our ordinaryshares pursuant and/or traceable to our registration statement on Form F-1 (File No. 333-197344) used in connection with our initial public offering, or ourIPO, were commenced in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Mateo, the Superior Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts,Suffolk County, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, and the United States District Court for the District ofMassachusetts.The actions involve claims under various sections of the Securities Act against us, certain of our current and former directors and officers, theunderwriters of our IPO and certain entities referred to by plaintiffs as the “Venture Capital Defendants.” Although the four actions commenced in theSuperior Court of the State of California, County of San Mateo have been dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction, the four actions commenced in the otherforums remain pending (two of which have been consolidated). For more information, see “Part I. Item 3- Legal Proceedings.”We are generally required, to the extent permitted by Israeli law, to indemnify our current and former directors and officers who are named asdefendants in these types of lawsuits. We also have certain contractual indemnification obligations to the underwriters of our IPO regarding the securitiesclass action lawsuits. While a certain amount of insurance coverage is available for expenses or losses associated with these lawsuits, this coverage may notbe sufficient. Based on information currently available, we are unable to reasonably estimate a possible loss or range of possible losses, if any, with regard tothese lawsuits; therefore, no litigation reserve has been recorded in our consolidated balance sheets. Although we plan to defend against these lawsuitsvigorously, there can be no assurances that a favorable final outcome will be obtained. These lawsuits or future litigation may require significant attentionfrom management and could result in significant legal expenses, settlement costs or damage awards that could have a materially adverse impact on ourfinancial position, results of operations and cash flows.26Table of ContentsU.S. healthcare reform measures and other recent legislative initiatives could adversely affect our business.Recently, the U.S. House of Representatives and Senate passed legislation, which, if signed into law, would repeal certain aspects of the PPACA.Further, on January 20, 2017, U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive order directing federal agencies with authorities and responsibilities underthe PPACA to waive, defer, grant exemptions from, or delay the implementation of any provision of the PPACA that would impose a fiscal or regulatoryburden on states, individuals, healthcare providers, health insurers or manufacturers of pharmaceuticals or medical devices. Congress also could considersubsequent legislation to replace elements of the PPACA that are repealed.Healthcare reforms stemming from the repeal of, and potential replacement for, the PPACA may result in more rigorous coverage criteria and lowerreimbursement among regulated third-party payors, and in additional downward pressure on the prices that we receive for sales of our device. Any reductionin reimbursement from Medicare or other government-funded federal programs, including the VA, or state healthcare programs could lead to a similarreduction in payments from private commercial payors. The implementation of cost containment measures or other healthcare reforms may thus prevent usfrom being able to generate revenue, attain profitability or further commercialize our existing or future ReWalk devices. We are currently unable to predict what additional legislation or regulation, if any, relating to the health care industry may be enacted in the futureor what effect recently enacted federal legislation or any such additional legislation or regulation would have on our business. The pendency or approval ofsuch proposals or reforms could result in a decrease in our stock price or limit our ability to raise capital or to enter into collaboration agreements for thefurther development and commercialization of our programs and products.Risks Related to Government Regulation The FDA previously sent us letters regarding potential regulatory action for deficiencies in our mandatory post-market surveillance study on our ReWalkPersonal 6.0. While we have since initiated this post-market surveillance study with a revised FDA-approved protocol and have addressed the violationscited by the FDA, if we cannot satisfy future FDA requests promptly or if our study produces unfavorable results, we could receive additional FDA warningletters, and our labeling or marketing efforts could be materially adversely affected. On September 30, 2015, we received a warning letter, or the September 2015 Letter, from the FDA citing deficiencies in our protocol for a post-market surveillance study of our ReWalk Personal and our failure to initiate a post-market study by the September 28, 2015 deadline. Between June 2014 andour receipt of the September 2015 Letter, we submitted our post-market study protocol to the FDA, amended the protocol in response to the FDA’ssubsequent request and proposed additional amendments to enhance the protocol after the FDA notified us that our subsequently-amended protocol was stilldeficient. While we responded to the FDA’s requests throughout this period, we did not submit all of our responses on a timely basis. The September 2015Letter warned that the FDA could take regulatory action against us for violations of Section 522 of the FFDCA based on the late post-market study andallegedly deficient protocol for that study. In February 2016, the FDA sent us an additional information request, or the February 2016 Letter, requestingadditional changes to our post-market surveillance study protocol and asking that we comply within 30 days. This letter also discussed the FDA’s request, asmodified in our later discussions with the FDA, for a new pre-market notification for our ReWalk device linked to what the FDA viewed as changes to acomputer included with the device, or the special 510(k). In late March 2016, following our multiple discussions with the FDA, including an in-person meeting, the FDA confirmed that the agency wouldapply enforcement discretion to continued marketing of the ReWalk device conditioned upon our submitting a special 510(k) by April 8, 2016, andinitiating our post-market surveillance study by June 1, 2016. The special 510(k) was submitted on April 8, 2016, and the FDA’s substantialequivalence determination was received by us on July 22, 2016, granting us permission to continue marketing the ReWalk device. Additionally, wesubmitted a protocol to the FDA for the post-market surveillance study that was approved by the agency on May 5, 2016. We began the study on June 13,2016, with Stanford University as the lead investigational site. On August 18, 2016, the FDA sent us a letter stating that, based on its evaluation of ourcorrective and preventive actions in response to the September 2015 Letter, we had adequately addressed the violations cited in the September 2015 Letter.Our post-market surveillance study is currently ongoing, and we have provided the FDA with the required periodic reports on the study’s progress, in a fewcases with delay. We intend to continue providing the FDA with such reports on a timely basis going forward. 27Table of ContentsWe expect we will be able to respond promptly to the FDA’s further requests related to the post-market surveillance study based on significantadditions in staffing aimed at addressing a need for greater internal clinical and regulatory resources. However, if we are unable to satisfy this timing or if theresults of our post-market surveillance study are not as favorable as we expect, the FDA may issue additional warning letters to us, may impose limitations onthe labeling of our device or may require us to stop marketing the ReWalk Personal device in the United States. We derived 64% of our revenues in 2016from sales of the ReWalk device in the United States and, if we are required to market a previous version of the ReWalk device in the United States, we expectthat these sales would be adversely impacted, which could materially adversely affect our business and overall results of operations.We are subject to extensive governmental regulations relating to the manufacturing, labeling and marketing of our products, and a failure to comply withsuch regulations could lead to withdrawal or recall of our products from the market. Our medical products and manufacturing operations are subject to regulation by the FDA, the European Union, and other governmental authoritiesboth inside and outside of the United States. These agencies enforce laws and regulations that govern the development, testing, manufacturing, labeling,storage, installation, servicing, advertising, promoting, marketing, distribution, import, export and market surveillance of ReWalk. Our products are regulated as medical devices in the United States under the FFDCA as implemented and enforced by the FDA. Under the FFDCA,medical devices are classified into one of three classes (Class I, Class II or Class III) depending on the degree of risk associated with the medical device, whatis known about the type of device, and the extent of control needed to provide reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness. Classification of a device isimportant because the class to which a device is assigned determines, among other things, the necessity and type of FDA review required prior to marketingthe device. For more information, see “Part I. Item 1. Business-Government Regulation” above. In June 2014, the FDA granted our petition for “de novo” classification, which provides a route to market for medical devices that are low tomoderate risk, but are not substantially equivalent to a predicate device, and classified ReWalk as Class II subject to certain special controls. The ReWalk isintended to enable individuals with spinal cord injuries to perform ambulatory functions under supervision of a specially trained companion, and insiderehabilitation institutions. The special controls established in the de novo order include the following: compliance with medical device consensus standards;clinical testing to demonstrate safe and effective use considering the level of supervision necessary and the use environment; non-clinical performancetesting, including durability testing to demonstrate that the device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use; a training program; and labelingrelated to device use and user training. In order for us to market ReWalk, we must comply with both general controls, including controls related to quality,facility registration, reporting of adverse events and labeling, and the special controls established for the device. Failure to comply with the general andspecial controls could lead to removal of ReWalk from the market, which would have a material adverse effect on our business. Following the introduction of a product, the governmental agencies will periodically review our manufacturing processes and product performance,and we are under a continuing obligation to ensure that all applicable regulatory requirements continue to be met. The process of complying with theapplicable good manufacturing practices, adverse event reporting and other requirements can be costly and time consuming, and could delay or prevent theproduction, manufacturing or sale of the ReWalk. In addition, if we fail to comply with applicable regulatory requirements, it could result in fines or delays ofregulatory clearances, closure of manufacturing sites, seizures or recalls of products and damage to our reputation. Recent changes in enforcement practice bythe FDA, European Union and other agencies have resulted in increased enforcement activity, which increases the compliance risk that we and othercompanies in our industry are facing. In addition, governmental agencies may impose new requirements regarding registration, labeling or prohibited materials that may require us tomodify or re-register ReWalk once it is already on the market or otherwise impact our ability to market ReWalk in those countries. The process of complyingwith these governmental regulations can be costly and time consuming, and could delay or prevent the production, manufacturing or sale of ReWalk. Forinstance, the FDA may issue mandates, known as 522 orders, requiring us to conduct post-market studies of products for which the FDA has already grantedus pre-market clearance. Failure to comply could result in enforcement of the FFDCA against us or our products. Additionally, the agency could request thatwe recall our ReWalk Personal 6.0 device. For more information on certain deficiencies previously identified by the FDA in our mandatory post-marketsurveillance study on our ReWalk Personal 6.0, see “-The FDA previously sent us letters regarding potential regulatory action for deficiencies in ourmandatory post-market surveillance study on our ReWalk Personal 6.0…” above.28Table of ContentsIf we or our third-party manufacturers or suppliers fail to comply with the FDA’s Quality System Regulation, or QSR, our manufacturing operations couldbe interrupted. We, Sanmina and some of our suppliers are required to comply with the FDA’s QSR which covers the methods and documentation of the design,testing, production, control, quality assurance, labeling, packaging, sterilization, storage and shipping of our products. We, Sanmina and our suppliers arealso subject to the regulations of foreign jurisdictions regarding the manufacturing process if we or our distributors market our products abroad. We continueto monitor our quality management in order to improve our overall level of compliance. Our facilities are subject to periodic and unannounced inspection byU.S. and foreign regulatory agencies to audit compliance with the QSR and comparable foreign regulations. If our facilities or those of Sanmina or oursuppliers are found to be in violation of applicable laws and regulations, or if we, Sanmina or our suppliers fail to take satisfactory corrective action inresponse to an adverse inspection, the regulatory authority could take enforcement action, including any of the following sanctions:•untitled letters, warning letters, fines, injunctions, consent decrees and civil penalties;•customer notifications or repair, replacement or refunds;•operating restrictions or partial suspension or total shutdown of production;•recalls, withdrawals, or administrative detention or seizure of our products;•refusing or delaying requests for 510(k) marketing clearance or approval of pre-market approval applications relating to new products or modifiedproducts;•reclassifying a 510(k) cleared device or withdrawing a PMA approval;•refusing to provide Certificates for Foreign Government;•refusing to grant export approval for our products; or•pursuing criminal prosecution. Any of these sanctions could impair our ability to produce ReWalk in a cost-effective and timely manner in order to meet our customers’ demands,and could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, results of operations and financial condition. We may also be required to bear other costsor take other actions that may have a negative impact on our future sales and our ability to generate profits. We are subject to various laws and regulations, including “fraud and abuse” laws and anti-bribery laws, which, if violated, could subject us to substantialpenalties. Medical device companies such as ours have faced lawsuits and investigations pertaining to alleged violations of numerous statutes and regulations,including anti-corruption laws and health care “fraud and abuse” laws, such as the federal False Claims Act, the federal Anti-Kickback Statute and the U.S.Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, or the FCPA. See Item 1. “Business-Government Regulation” above. U.S. federal and state laws, including the federalPhysician Payments Sunshine Act, or the Sunshine Act, and the implementation of Open Payments regulations under the Sunshine Act, require medicaldevice companies to disclose certain payments or other transfers of value made to healthcare providers and teaching hospitals or funds spent on marketingand promotion of medical device products. It is widely believed that public reporting under the Sunshine Act and implementing Open Payments regulationsresults in increased scrutiny of the financial relationships between industry, physicians and teaching hospitals. These anti-kickback, anti-bribery, publicreporting and aggregate spending laws affect our sales, marketing and other promotional activities by limiting the kinds of financial arrangements, includingsales programs, we may have with hospitals, rehabilitation centers, physicians or other potential purchasers or users of ReWalk. They also impose additionaladministrative and compliance burdens on us. In particular, these laws influence, among other things, how we structure our sales offerings, including discountpractices, customer support, education and training programs and physician consulting and other service arrangements. If we are in violation of any of theserequirements or any actions are instituted against us, and we are not successful in defending ourselves or asserting our rights, those actions could have asignificant impact on our business, including the imposition of significant criminal and civil fines and penalties, exclusion from federal healthcare programsor other sanctions. 29Table of ContentsThe FCPA applies to companies, including ours, with a class of securities registered under the Exchange Act. The FCPA and other anti-bribery lawsto which various aspects of our operations may be subject generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to officialsfor the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. In various jurisdictions, our operations require that we and third parties acting on our behalf routinelyinteract with government officials, including medical personnel who may be considered government officials for purposes of these laws because they areemployees of state-owned or controlled facilities. Other anti-bribery laws to which various aspects of our operations may be subject, including theUnited Kingdom Bribery Act, also prohibit improper payments to private parties and prohibit receipt of improper payments. Our policies prohibit ouremployees from making or receiving corrupt payments, including, among other things, to require compliance by third parties engaged to act on our behalf.Our policies mandate compliance with these anti-bribery laws; however, we operate in many parts of the world that have experienced governmental and/orprivate corruption to some degree. As a result, the existence and implementation of a robust anti-corruption program cannot eliminate all risk thatunauthorized reckless or criminal acts have been or will be committed by our employees or agents. Violations of these laws, or allegations of such violations,could disrupt our business and harm our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and reputation. If we are found to have violated laws protecting the confidentiality of patient health information, we could be subject to civil or criminal penalties, whichcould increase our liabilities and harm our reputation or our business. There are a number of federal, state and foreign laws protecting the confidentiality of certain patient health information, including patient records,and restricting the use and disclosure of that protected information. In particular, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, or HHS, promulgatedpatient privacy rules under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, or HIPAA. These privacy rules protect medical records and otherpersonal health information by limiting their use and disclosure, giving individuals the right to access, amend and seek accounting of their own healthinformation and limiting most use and disclosures of health information to the minimum amount reasonably necessary to accomplish the intended purpose. Ifwe or any of our service providers are found to be in violation of the promulgated patient privacy rules under HIPAA, we could be subject to civil or criminalpenalties, which could increase our liabilities, harm our reputation and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operatingresults. Compliance with various regulations, including those related to our status as a U.S. public company and the manufacturing, labeling and marketing of ourproducts, may result in heightened general and administrative expenses and costs, divert management’s attention from revenue-generating activities andpose challenges for our management team, which has limited time, personnel and finances to devote to regulatory compliance. As a U.S. public company, we are subject to various regulatory and reporting requirements, including those imposed by the SEC, the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, or the Dodd-Frank Act, the listingrequirements of the Nasdaq Global Market and other applicable securities rules and regulations. Additionally, our medical products and manufacturingoperations are regulated by the FDA, the European Union and other governmental authorities both inside and outside of the United States. Compliance withthe rules and regulations applicable to us as a publicly traded company in the United States and medical device manufacturer has greatly increased, and maycontinue to increase, our legal, general and administrative and financial compliance costs and has made, and may continue to make, some activities moredifficult, time-consuming or costly. Additionally, these regulatory requirements have diverted, and may continue to divert, management’s attention fromrevenue-generating activities and may increase demands on management’s already-limited resources.Our management team consists of few employees, as the majority of our employees are engaged in sales and marketing and research anddevelopment activities. As part of our previously announced plan to reduce our operating expenses by up to 30% in 2017 as compared to 2016, in the firstquarter of 2017, we reduced the number of employees to 70 worldwide, including in areas such as finance and information technology, which could affect ourability to comply with various regulations facing us as a public company. In light of such constraints on its time, personnel and finances, our managementmay not be able to implement programs and policies in an effective and timely manner to respond adequately to the heightened legal, regulatory andreporting requirements applicable to us. In the past, for example, we have not always been able to respond on a timely basis to requests from regulators,although we have not to date experienced any long-term material adverse consequences as a result. For more information, see “-The FDA previously sent usletters regarding potential regulatory action for deficiencies in our mandatory post-market surveillance study on our ReWalk Personal 6.0…” above. Similardeficiencies, weaknesses or lack of compliance with public company, medical device and other regulations could harm our reputation in the capital marketsor for quality and safety, negatively affect our ability to maintain our public company status and to develop, commercialize or continue selling our productson a timely and effective basis, and cause us to incur sanctions, including fines, injunctions and penalties. 30Table of ContentsIn addition, complying with public disclosure rules makes our business more visible, which we believe may result in threatened or actual litigation,including by competitors and other third parties. If such claims are successful, our business and operating results could be harmed, and even if the claims donot result in litigation or are resolved in our favor, these claims, and the time and resources necessary to resolve them, could divert the resources of ourmanagement and harm our business and operating results. Compliance with new regulations regarding the use of conflict minerals may be time-consuming and costly and could adversely affect our reputation. In August 2012, under the Dodd-Frank Act, the SEC adopted new requirements for companies that use certain minerals and derivative metals,namely, tantalum, tin, gold and tungsten (referred to as “conflict minerals” regardless of their actual country of origin) in their products. These rules require usto investigate whether our products contain such “conflict minerals” and, in May 2017 (for the year ended December 31, 2016), to include on a Form SD filedwith the SEC appropriate disclosures regarding our use of such minerals during the previous calendar year. There will be costs associated with theseinvestigation and disclosure requirements, and we may be unable to complete our diligence in time. In addition, depending upon our findings, or ourinability to make reliable findings, about the source of any possible conflict minerals that may be used in any products manufactured for us by third parties,our reputation could be harmed, which could cause us to lose those customers who require that all of the components of our products be certified as conflict-free. If we are not able to meet customer requirements, customer demand for our products may decline, and we may have to write off inventory in the eventthat it cannot be sold. Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property Our success depends in part on our ability to obtain and maintain protection for the intellectual property relating to or incorporated into our products. Our success depends in part on our ability to obtain and maintain protection for the intellectual property relating to or incorporated into ourproducts. We seek to protect our intellectual property through a combination of patents, trademarks, confidentiality and assignment agreements with ouremployees and certain of our contractors and confidentiality agreements with certain of our consultants, scientific advisors and other vendors and contractors.In addition, we rely on trade secrets law to protect our proprietary software and product candidates/products in development. For more information, see Part I.Item 1. Business-Intellectual Property.” The patent position of robotic and exoskeleton inventions can be highly uncertain and involves many new and evolving complex legal, factual andtechnical issues. Patent laws and interpretations of those laws are subject to change and any such changes may diminish the value of our patents or narrow thescope of protection. In addition, we may fail to apply for or be unable to obtain patents necessary to protect our technology or products or enforce our patentsdue to lack of information about the exact use of technology or processes by third parties. Also, we cannot be sure that any patents will be granted in a timelymanner or at all with respect to any of our patent pending applications or that any patents that are granted will be adequate to protect our intellectualproperty for any significant period of time or at all. Litigation to establish or challenge the validity of patents, or to defend against or assert against others infringement, unauthorized use,enforceability or invalidity claims, can be lengthy and expensive and may result in our patents being invalidated or interpreted narrowly and our not beinggranted new patents related to our pending patent applications. Even if we prevail, litigation may be time consuming and force us to incur significant costs,and any damages or other remedies awarded to us may not be valuable and management’s attention could be diverted from managing our business. Inaddition, U.S. patents and patent applications may be subject to interference proceedings, and U.S. patents may be subject to re-examination and reviewproceedings in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Foreign patents may also be subject to opposition or comparable proceedings in the correspondingforeign patent offices. Any of these proceedings may be expensive and could result in the loss of a patent or denial of a patent application, or the loss orreduction in the scope of one or more of the claims of a patent or patent application. In addition, we seek to protect our trade secrets, know-how and confidential information that is not patentable by entering into confidentiality andassignment agreements with our employees and certain of our contractors and confidentiality agreements with certain of our consultants, scientific advisorsand other vendors and contractors. However, we may fail to enter into the necessary agreements, and even if entered into, these agreements may be breachedor otherwise fail to prevent disclosure, third-party infringement or misappropriation of our proprietary information, may be limited as to their term and maynot provide an adequate remedy in the event of unauthorized disclosure or use of proprietary information. Enforcing a claim that a third party illegallyobtained and is using our trade secrets is expensive and time consuming, and the outcome is unpredictable. We may also grant our employees or consultantsownership over certain technology which they license to us for a set term. If these technologies are material to our business after the term of the license, ourinability to use them could adversely affect our business and profitability.31Table of Contents We also have taken precautions to initiate reasonable safeguards to protect our information technology systems. However, these measures may notbe adequate to safeguard our proprietary information, which could lead to the loss or impairment thereof or to expensive litigation to defend our rightsagainst competitors who may be better funded and have superior resources. In addition, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy or reverse engineer certainaspects of our products that we consider proprietary or our proprietary information may otherwise become known or may be independently developed by ourcompetitors or other third parties. If other parties are able to use our proprietary technology or information, our ability to compete in the market could beharmed. Further, unauthorized use of our intellectual property may have occurred, or may occur in the future, without our knowledge. If we are unable to obtain or maintain adequate protection for intellectual property, or if any protection is reduced or eliminated, competitors may beable to use our technologies, resulting in harm to our competitive position. Our patents and proprietary technology and processes may not provide us with a competitive advantage. Robotics and exoskeleton technologies have been developing rapidly in recent years. We are aware of several other companies developingcompeting exoskeleton devices for individuals with limited mobility and we expect the level of competition and the pace of development in our industry toincrease. For more information, see “Part I. Item 1. Business-Competition” above. While we believe our tilt-sensor technology provides a more natural andsuperior method of exoskeleton activation, which creates a better user experience, a variety of other activation and control methods exist for exoskeletons,several of which are being developed by our competitors, or may be developed in the future. As a result, our patent portfolio and proprietary technology andprocesses may not provide us with a significant advantage over our competitors, and competitors may be able to design and sell alternative products that areequal to or superior to our products without infringing on our patents. In addition, upon the expiration of our current patents, we may be unable to adequatelydevelop new technologies and obtain future patent protection to preserve our competitive advantage. If we are unable to maintain a competitive advantage,our business and results of operations may be materially adversely affected. Even in instances where others are found to infringe on our patents, many countries have laws under which a patent owner may be compelled togrant licenses for the use of the patented technology to other parties. In addition, many countries limit the enforceability of patents against other parties,including government agencies or government contractors. In these countries, a patent owner may have limited remedies, which could diminish the value of apatent in those countries. Further, the laws of some countries do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States,particularly in the field of medical products, and effective enforcement in those countries may not be available. The ability of others to market comparableproducts could adversely affect our business. We depend on computer and telecommunications systems we do not own or control and failures in our systems or a cybersecurity attack or breach of ourIT systems or technology could significantly disrupt our business operations or result in sensitive customer information being compromised which wouldnegatively materially affect our reputation and/or results of operations.We have entered into agreements with third parties for hardware, software, telecommunications and other information technology services inconnection with the operation of our business. It is possible we or a third party that we rely on could incur interruptions from a loss of communications,hardware or software failures, a cybersecurity attack or a breach of our IT systems or technology, computer viruses or malware. We believe that we havepositive relations with our vendors and maintain adequate anti-virus and malware software and controls; however, any interruptions to our arrangements withthird parties, to our computing and communications infrastructure, or to our information systems or any of those operated by a third party that we rely oncould significantly disrupt our business operations.A cyber attack of our systems or networks that impairs our information technology systems could disrupt our business operations and result in loss ofservice to customers, including technical support for our ReWalk devices. While we have certain cybersecurity safeguards in place designed to protect andpreserve the integrity of our information technology systems, we have experienced and expect to continue to experience actual or attempted cyber attacks ofour IT systems or networks. However, none of these actual or attempted cyber attacks has had a material effect on our operations or financial condition.Additionally, we have access to sensitive customer information in the ordinary course of business. If a significant data breach occurred, ourreputation may be adversely affected, customer confidence may be diminished, or we may be subject to legal claims, any of which may contribute to the lossof customers and have a material adverse effect on us. For more information, see " If we are found to have violated laws protecting the confidentiality ofpatient health information, we could be subject to civil or criminal penalties, which could increase our liabilities and harm our reputation or our business."above.32Table of ContentsWe are not able to protect our intellectual property rights in all countries. Filing, prosecuting, maintaining and defending patents on each of our products in all countries throughout the world would be prohibitivelyexpensive, and thus our intellectual property rights outside the United States are limited. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries, especiallydeveloping countries, do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as federal and state laws in the United States. Also, it may not be possibleto effectively enforce intellectual property rights in some countries at all or to the same extent as in the United States and other countries. Consequently, weare unable to prevent third parties from using our inventions in all countries, or from selling or importing products made using our inventions in thejurisdictions in which we do not have (or are unable to effectively enforce) patent protection. Competitors may use our technologies in jurisdictions where wehave not obtained patent protection to develop, market or otherwise commercialize their own products, and we may be unable to prevent those competitorsfrom importing those infringing products into territories where we have patent protection, but enforcement is not as strong as in the United States. Theseproducts may compete with our products and our patents and other intellectual property rights may not be effective or sufficient to prevent them fromcompeting in those jurisdictions. Moreover, competitors or others in the chain of commerce may raise legal challenges against our intellectual property rightsor may infringe upon our intellectual property rights, including through means that may be difficult to prevent or detect. Many companies have encountered significant problems in protecting and defending intellectual property rights in foreign jurisdictions.Proceedings to enforce our patent rights in the United States or foreign jurisdictions could result in substantial costs and divert our efforts and attention fromother aspects of our business, could put our patents at risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly and our patent applications at risk of not issuing, andcould provoke third parties to assert patent infringement or other claims against us. We may not prevail in any lawsuits that we initiate and the damages orother remedies awarded, if any, may not be commercially meaningful. Accordingly, our efforts to enforce our intellectual property rights in the United Statesand around the world may be inadequate to obtain a significant commercial advantage from the intellectual property that we develop or license from thirdparties. We may be subject to patent infringement claims, which could result in substantial costs and liability and prevent us from commercializing our current andfuture products. The medical device industry is characterized by competing intellectual property and a substantial amount of litigation over patent rights. Inparticular, our competitors in both the United States and abroad, many of which have substantially greater resources and have made substantial investmentsin competing technologies, have been issued patents and filed patent applications with respect to their products and processes and may apply for otherpatents in the future. The large number of patents, the rapid rate of new patent issuances and the complexities of the technology involved increase the risk ofpatent litigation. Determining whether a product infringes a patent involves complex legal and factual issues and the outcome of patent litigation is often uncertain.Even though we have conducted research of issued patents, no assurance can be given that patents containing claims covering our products, technology ormethods do not exist, have not been filed or could not be filed or issued. In addition, because patent applications can take years to issue and becausepublication schedules for pending applications vary by jurisdiction, there may be applications now pending of which we are unaware and may result inissued patents which our current or future products infringe. Also, because the claims of published patent applications can change between publication andparent grant, published applications may issue with claims that potentially cover our products, technology or methods.Infringement actions and other intellectual property claims brought against us, with or without merit, may cause us to incur substantial costs andcould place a significant strain on our financial resources, divert the attention of management and harm our reputation. We cannot be certain that we willsuccessfully defend against any allegations of infringement. If we are found to infringe another party’s patents, we could be required to pay damages. Wecould also be prevented from selling our products that infringe, unless we could obtain a license to use the technology covered by such patents or couldredesign our products so that they do not infringe. A license may be available on commercially reasonable terms or none at all, and we may not be able toredesign our products to avoid infringement. Further, any modification to our products could require us to conduct clinical trials and revise our filings withthe FDA and other regulatory bodies, which would be time consuming and expensive. In these circumstances, we may not be able to sell our products atcompetitive prices or at all, and our business and operating results could be harmed. 33Table of ContentsWe rely on trademark protection to distinguish our products from the products of our competitors. We rely on trademark protection to distinguish our products from the products of our competitors. We have registered the trademark “ReWalk” inIsrael and are in the process of registering our trademark in the United States. In jurisdictions where we have not registered our trademark and are using it, andas permitted by applicable local law, we rely on common law trademark protection. Third parties may oppose our trademark applications, or otherwisechallenge our use of the trademarks, and may be able to use our trademarks in jurisdictions where they are not registered or otherwise protected by law. If ourtrademarks are successfully challenged or if a third party is using confusingly similar or identical trademarks in particular jurisdictions before we do, wecould be forced to rebrand our products, which could result in loss of brand recognition, and could require us to devote additional resources to marketing newbrands. If others are able to use our trademarks, our ability to distinguish our products may be impaired, which could adversely affect our business. Further,we cannot assure you that competitors will not infringe upon our trademarks, or that we will have adequate resources to enforce our trademarks. We may be subject to damages resulting from claims that our employees or we have wrongfully used or disclosed alleged trade secrets of their formeremployers. Many of our employees were previously employed at other medical device companies, including our competitors or potential competitors, and wemay hire employees in the future that are so employed. We could in the future be subject to claims that these employees, or we, have inadvertently orotherwise used or disclosed trade secrets or other proprietary information of their former employers. If we fail in defending against such claims, a court couldorder us to pay substantial damages and prohibit us from using technologies or features that are found to incorporate or be derived from the trade secrets orother proprietary information of the former employers. If any of these technologies or features that are important to our products, this could prevent us fromselling those products and could have a material adverse effect on our business. Even if we are successful in defending against these claims, such litigationcould result in substantial costs and divert the attention of management. Risks Related to an Investment in Our SecuritiesSales of a substantial number of ordinary shares or volatility or a reduction in the market price of our ordinary shares could have an adverse effect on ourordinary shares and on the value of the warrants offered in our follow-on offering completed in November 2016. On November 1, 2016, we closed our follow-on public offering of 3,250,000 units, each consisting of one ordinary share and 0.75 of a warrant topurchase one ordinary share. As a result, we issued 3,250,000 ordinary shares and warrants to purchase up to 2,437,500 ordinary shares. We also grantedOppenheimer as underwriter the option to purchase 487,500 additional units for up to 30 days after October 27, 2016, which Oppenheimer did not exercise.The ordinary shares included in the units and/or the ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants included in the units will, once issued, be freelytradable without restriction or further registration under the Securities Act, subject to limitations on resales by our affiliates under Rule 144 under theSecurities Act. Additionally, the warrants became immediately exercisable upon issuance. As of February 1, 2017, we did not issue any ordinary sharespursuant to the exercise of these warrants. Sales by us or our shareholders of a substantial number of ordinary shares in the public market, or the perceptionthat these sales might occur, could cause the value of our securities to decline or could impair our ability to raise capital through a future sale of, or pay foracquisitions using, our equity securities. Additionally, while there is no established public trading market for the warrants and we do not expect one todevelop, any volatility or reduction in the market price of our ordinary shares could have an adverse effect on the trading price of the warrants given that theyare exercisable into ordinary shares. 34Table of ContentsAdditionally, as of February 1, 2017, 570,816 ordinary shares were issuable pursuant to the exercise of outstanding warrants granted as part of ourseries E investment round in July 2014 and to Kreos in connection with our loan agreement with Kreos in January and December 2016, and 3,277,911 sharesremained available for issuance to our and our affiliates’ respective employees, non-employee directors and consultants under our equity incentive plans,including 2,234,227 ordinary shares subject to outstanding awards. Pursuant to our Amended and Restated Shareholders’ Rights Agreement, dated July 14,2014, with certain of our shareholders, as of February 1, 2017, the beneficial owners of approximately 4,203,143 of our ordinary shares were also entitled torequire that we register their shares under the Securities Act for resale into the public markets. With respect to the outstanding warrants, there may be certainrestrictions on the holders to sell the ordinary shares issuable thereunder to the extent they are restricted securities and/or are held by affiliates. Shares issuedpursuant to our equity incentive plans may be freely sold in the public market upon issuance, subject to vesting provisions, except for shares held byaffiliates who have certain restrictions on their ability to sell. All shares sold pursuant to an offering covered by such registration statement would be freelytransferable. Our largest shareholders, Yaskawa Electric Corporation and certain entities, individuals affiliated with SCP Vitalife Partners and IsraelHealthcare Venture Partners 2 L.P., may also have limitations under Rule 144 under the Securities Act on the resale of certain ordinary shares they hold.Despite these limitations, if we, our existing shareholders, particularly our largest shareholders, our directors, their affiliates or our executive officers, sell asubstantial number of the above-mentioned ordinary shares in the public market, the market price of our ordinary shares could decrease significantly.The exercise price and the number of ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants offered in our follow-on public offering of units, as completedin November 2016, can fluctuate under certain circumstances. If triggered, these adjustments could result in potentially material dilution to holders of ourordinary shares. Under the terms of the warrants offered in our follow-on offering completed in November 2016, the exercise price and the number of ordinary sharesfor which the warrants are exercisable will be adjusted upon certain corporate events, including stock splits, reverse stock splits, combinations, stockdividends, recapitalizations and reorganizations and certain other events. Our board of directors also has discretion, pursuant to the warrants, to determinewhether to make such adjustments to the exercise price and number of ordinary shares to be issued upon exercise of the warrants based on similar events, suchas the granting of stock appreciation rights, phantom stock rights or other rights with equity features. Lastly, at any time, the board of directors may reducethe exercise price of the warrants to any amount and for any period of time it deems appropriate. These provisions could result in substantial dilution toholders of our ordinary shares, which may make it difficult for us to raise additional capital at prevailing market terms in the future.We may not be able to maintain the listing of our ordinary shares on the Nasdaq Global Market, which could adversely affect our liquidity and the tradingvolume and market price of our ordinary shares, and decrease or eliminate your investment.On December 14, 2016, we received a notification letter from Nasdaq advising us that we had failed to comply with the minimum $50 millionmarket value of listed securities, or MVLS, requirement for continued listing on The Nasdaq Global Market pursuant to Nasdaq Listing Rule 5450(b)(2)(A). The letter also indicated that we did not meet the alternative total assets and total revenue standard requirements under Nasdaq Listing Rule 5450(b)(3)(A).Nasdaq stated in the letter that in accordance with Nasdaq listing rules, we had been provided a compliance period of 180 calendar days, or until June 12,2017, to regain compliance with the MVLS continued listing requirement. The notice also states that if, at any time before June 12, 2017, the MVLS of ourordinary shares closes at $50 million or more for a minimum of 10 consecutive business days, the Nasdaq staff will provide us with written notification thatwe have achieved compliance with the MVLS continued listing requirement and the matter will be closed. We could also regain compliance with Nasdaqcontinued listing requirements by reporting stockholders’ equity of $10 million or more. If we do not regain compliance by June 12, 2017, we will receivewritten notice that our securities are subject to delisting. At that time, we would be permitted to appeal the delisting determination to a Nasdaq HearingsPanel or, as noted above, to apply to transfer our ordinary shares to The Nasdaq Capital Market (provided that it satisfied the requirement for continuedlisting on that market). In the event of an appeal, our ordinary shares would remain listed on The Nasdaq Global Market pending a decision by the panelfollowing the hearing. This letter is simply a notice of deficiency, not of imminent delisting, and has no immediate effect on the listing or trading of ReWalk ordinaryshares on The Nasdaq Global Market at this time. However, if we fail to achieve compliance by June 12, 2017, the perception among investors that we are atheightened risk of delisting could negatively affect the market price and trading volume of our ordinary shares. Additionally, if we do not succeed inappealing a delisting determination or cannot transfer our ordinary shares to the Nasdaq Capital Market, our ordinary shares could be delisted from Nasdaqentirely, which could reduce the number of investors willing to hold or acquire our ordinary shares, increase the volatility of the price of such shares andsignificantly lower the shares’ trading price and volume. Any of these events could also reduce our liquidity and impair our ability to raise capital. 35Table of ContentsWe may not have the ability to repurchase the warrants offered in our follow-on public offering of units. Under certain circumstances, if a change of control (as defined in the warrants) occurs, holders of the warrants offered in our follow-on offering mayrequire us or any successor to us to repurchase the remaining unexercised portion of such warrants for an amount of cash equal to the value of the Warrant asdetermined in accordance with the Black-Scholes option pricing model and the terms of the warrants. Our ability to repurchase the Warrants depends on ourability to generate cash flow in the future. To some extent, this is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative and regulatory factors andother factors that are beyond our control. We cannot provide any assurances to the holders of such warrants that we will maintain sufficient cash reserves orthat our business will generate cash flow from operations at levels sufficient to permit us to repurchase the warrants. The price of our ordinary shares may be volatile, and you may lose all or part of your investment. Our ordinary shares were first publicly offered in our initial public offering in September 2014, at a price of $12.00 per share, and our ordinary shareshave subsequently traded as high as $43.71 per share and as low as $1.95 per share through February 15, 2017. The market price of our ordinary shares couldbe highly volatile and may fluctuate substantially as a result of many factors. Moreover, while there is no established public trading market for the warrantsoffered in our follow-on public offering completed in November 2016, and we do not expect one to develop, our ordinary shares will be issuable pursuant toexercise of these warrants. Because the warrants are exercisable into our ordinary shares, volatility or a reduction in the market price of our ordinary sharescould have an adverse effect on the trading price of the warrants. Factors which may cause fluctuations in the price of our ordinary shares include, but are notlimited to:•actual or anticipated fluctuations in our growth rate or results of operations or those of our competitors;•customer acceptance of our products;•announcements by us or our competitors of new products or services, commercial relationships, acquisitions or expansion plans;•announcements by us or our competitors of other material developments;•our involvement in litigation;•changes in government regulation applicable to us and our products;•sales, or the anticipation of sales, of our ordinary shares, warrants and debt securities by us, or sales of our ordinary shares by our insiders or othershareholders, including upon expiration of contractual lock-up agreements;•developments with respect to intellectual property rights;•competition from existing or new technologies and products;•changes in key personnel;•the trading volume of our ordinary shares;•changes in the estimation of the future size and growth rate of our markets;•changes in our quarterly or annual forecasts with respect to operating results and financial conditions; and•general economic and market conditions. In addition, the stock markets have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations. Broad market and industry factors may materially harm themarket price of our ordinary shares, regardless of our operating performance. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company’ssecurities, securities class action litigation has often been instituted against that company. If we were involved in any similar litigation, we could incursubstantial costs and our management’s attention and resources could be diverted. 36Table of ContentsIf we do not meet the expectations of equity research analysts, if they do not continue to publish research or reports about our business or if they issueunfavorable commentary or downgrade our ordinary shares, the price of our ordinary shares could decline. The trading market for our ordinary shares relies in part on the research and reports that equity research analysts publish about us and our business.The analysts’ estimates are based upon their own opinions and are often different from our estimates or expectations. If our results of operations are below theestimates or expectations of public market analysts and investors, our share price could decline. Moreover, the price of our ordinary shares could decline ifone or more securities analysts downgrade our ordinary shares or if those analysts issue other unfavorable commentary or do not publish research or reportsabout us or our business. A small number of our shareholders have a significant influence over matters requiring shareholder approval, which could delay or prevent a change ofcontrol. The largest beneficial owners of our shares, Yaskawa Electric Corporation and certain entities and individuals affiliated with SCP Vitalife Partners,beneficially own in the aggregate 19.7% of our ordinary shares as of February 1, 2017. As a result, these shareholders, should they choose to act together orand even if they act individually, will exert significant influence over our operations and business strategy and would together have sufficient voting powerto influence significantly the outcome of matters requiring shareholder approval. These matters may include:•the composition of our board of directors, which has the authority to direct our business and to appoint and remove our officers;•approving or rejecting a merger, consolidation or other business combination;•raising future capital; and•amending our Second Amended and Restated Articles of Association, as amended by the First Amendment thereto, or our Articles of Association,which govern the rights attached to our ordinary shares. This concentration of ownership of our ordinary shares could delay or prevent proxy contests, mergers, tender offers, open-market purchase programsor other purchases of our ordinary shares that might otherwise give you the opportunity to realize a premium over the then-prevailing market price of ourordinary shares. This concentration of ownership may also adversely affect our share price. We are an “emerging growth company” and we cannot be certain whether the reduced requirements applicable to emerging growth companies will makeour ordinary shares less attractive to investors. We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, or the JOBS Act. As a result, we may takeadvantage of certain exemptions from various requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not “emerging growth companies.” Forinstance, we are subject to reduced compensation disclosure obligations under the JOBS Act, and we are not required to conduct votes seeking shareholderapproval on an advisory basis of (i) the compensation of our named executive officers or the frequency with which such votes must be conducted or (ii)compensation arrangements and understandings in connection with merger transactions, known as “golden parachute” arrangements. Additionally, we arenot required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act for up to five fiscal years after the date of ourinitial public offering. We will remain an emerging growth company until the earliest of: (a) the last day of our fiscal year during which we have total annual gross revenuesof at least $1.0 billion; (b) the last day of our fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of the completion of our initial public offering; (c) the date on whichwe have, during the previous three-year period, issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt; or (d) the date on which we are deemed to be a “largeaccelerated filer” under the Exchange Act. When we are no longer deemed to be an emerging growth company, we will not be entitled to the exemptionsprovided in the JOBS Act discussed above. We cannot predict if investors will find our securities less attractive as a result of our reliance on exemptionsunder the JOBS Act. If some investors find our securities less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our ordinary shares and theprice of our ordinary shares may be more volatile. 37Table of ContentsU.S. investors may suffer adverse tax consequences if we are characterized as a passive foreign investment company. Generally, if for any taxable year 75% or more of our gross income is passive income, or at least 50% of the average quarterly value of our assets(which may be determined in part by the market value of our ordinary shares, which is subject to change) are held for the production of, or produce, passiveincome, we would be characterized as a passive foreign investment company, or PFIC, for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Passive income for this purposegenerally includes, among other things, certain dividends, interest, royalties, rents and gains from commodities and securities transactions and from the saleor exchange of property that gives rise to passive income. Passive income also includes amounts derived by reason of the temporary investment of funds,including those raised in a public offering. In determining whether a non-U.S. corporation is a PFIC, a proportionate share of the income and assets of eachcorporation in which it owns, directly or indirectly, at least a 25% interest (by value) is taken into account. Based on our gross income and assets, the marketprice of our ordinary shares, and the nature of our business, we do not believe that we were a PFIC for the taxable year ended December 31, 2016 or that wewill be considered a PFIC for the taxable year ending December 31, 2017. However, there can be no assurance that we will not be considered a PFIC for 2017or any taxable year. PFIC status is determined as of the end of the taxable year and depends on a number of factors, including the value of a corporation’sassets and the amount and type of its gross income. Further, because the value of our gross assets is likely to be determined in large part by reference to ourmarket capitalization, a decline in the value of our ordinary shares may result in our becoming a PFIC. If we are characterized as a PFIC, U.S. Holders (as defined below) may suffer adverse tax consequences, including, (i) having gains realized on thesale of our securities treated as ordinary income, rather than as capital gains, (ii) the loss of the preferential rate applicable to dividends received on ourordinary shares by individuals who are U.S. Holders, and (iii) having additional taxes equal to the interest charges generally applicable to underpayments oftax apply to distributions by us and the proceeds of sales of our ordinary shares and the warrants issued in our follow-on offering. A “U.S. Holder” is definedas follows: a citizen or resident of the United States; a corporation (or other entity treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) created ororganized in or under the laws of the United States or any state thereof, including the District of Columbia; an estate the income of which is subject to U.S.federal income taxation regardless of its source; or a trust if such trust has validly elected to be treated as a United States person for U.S. federal income taxpurposes or if (1) a court within the United States is able to exercise primary supervision over its administration and (2) one or more United States personshave the authority to control all of the substantial decisions of such trust. Certain elections exist that may alleviate some of the adverse consequences of PFICstatus and would result in an alternative treatment (such as mark-to-market treatment); however, we do not intend to provide the information necessary forU.S. Holders to make qualified electing fund elections if we are classified as a PFIC. We are subject to ongoing costs and risks associated with determining whether our existing internal controls over financial reporting systems arecompliant with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and if we fail to achieve and maintain adequate internal controls it could have a material adverseeffect on our stated results of operations and harm our reputation. We are required to comply with the internal control, evaluation, and certification requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and thePublic Company Accounting Oversight Board. Unless we lose our status as an emerging growth company under the JOBS Act prior to the end of the fiscalyear in which the fifth anniversary of our initial public offering occurred, we will not be required to obtain an auditor attestation under Section 404 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act until the year ended December 31, 2019. However once we no longer qualify as an emerging growth company under the JOBS Act ourindependent registered public accounting firm will need to attest to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting under Section 404. The process of determining whether our existing internal controls over financial reporting systems are compliant with Section 404 and whether thereare any material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in our existing internal controls requires the investment of substantial time and resources, includingby our Chief Financial Officer and other members of our senior management. This determination and any remedial actions required could divert internalresources and take a significant amount of time and effort to complete and could result in us incurring additional costs that we did not anticipate, includingthe hiring of outside consultants. We could experience higher than anticipated operating expenses and higher independent auditor fees during and after theimplementation of these changes. Irrespective of compliance with Section 404, any failure of our internal controls could have a material adverse effect on our stated results ofoperations and harm our reputation. If we are unable to implement any of the required changes to our internal control over financial reporting effectively orefficiently or are required to do so earlier than anticipated, it could adversely affect our operations, financial reporting and/or results of operations and couldresult in an adverse opinion on internal controls from our management and, once we lose our emerging growth company status, our independent auditors.Further, if our internal control over financial reporting is not effective, the reliability of our financial statements may be questioned and our share price maysuffer. 38Table of ContentsRisks Relating to Our Incorporation and Location in Israel Our technology development and quality headquarters and the manufacturing facility for our products are located in Israel and, therefore, our results maybe adversely affected by economic restrictions imposed on, and political and military instability in, Israel. Our technology development and quality headquarters, which houses substantially all of our research and development and our core research anddevelopment team, including engineers, machinists, researchers, and clinical and regulatory personnel, as well as the facility of our contract manufacturer,Sanmina, are located in Israel. Many of our employees, directors and officers are residents of Israel. Accordingly, political, economic and military conditionsin Israel and the surrounding region may directly affect our business. Since the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948, a number of armed conflicts havetaken place between Israel and its Arab neighbors, Hamas (an Islamist militia and political group in the Gaza Strip) and Hezbollah (an Islamist militia andpolitical group in Lebanon). Any hostilities involving Israel or the interruption or curtailment of trade within Israel or between Israel and its trading partnerscould materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and could make it more difficult for us to raise capital. Inparticular, an interruption of operations at the Tel Aviv airport related to the conflict in the Gaza Strip or otherwise could prevent or delay shipments of ourcomponents or products. Although we maintain inventory in the United States and Germany, an extended interruption could materially and adversely affectour business, financial condition and results of operations. Recent political uprisings, social unrest and violence in various countries in the Middle East and North Africa, including Israel’s neighbors Egyptand Syria, are affecting the political stability of those countries. This instability may lead to deterioration of the political relationships that exist betweenIsrael and these countries and has raised concerns regarding security in the region and the potential for armed conflict. Our commercial insurance does notcover losses that may occur as a result of an event associated with the security situation in the Middle East. Any losses or damages incurred by us could havea material adverse effect on our business. In addition, Iran has threatened to attack Israel and is widely believed to be developing nuclear weapons. Iran is alsobelieved to have a strong influence among parties hostile to Israel in areas that neighbor Israel, such as the Syrian government, Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollahin Lebanon. Any armed conflicts, terrorist activities or political instability in the region could materially and adversely affect our business, financialcondition and results of operations. Our operations and the operations of our contract manufacturer, Sanmina, may be disrupted as a result of the obligation of Israeli citizens to performmilitary service. Many Israeli citizens are obligated to perform one month, and in some cases more, of annual military reserve duty until they reach the age of 45 (orolder, for reservists with certain occupations) and, in the event of a military conflict, may be called to active duty. In response to terrorist activity, there havebeen periods of significant call-ups of military reservists. For example, the Israeli armed forces called up a significant number of reservists to active duty inconnection with the recent conflict in the Gaza Strip. It is possible that there will be additional military reserve duty call-ups in the future in connection withthis conflict or otherwise. Some of our executive officers and employees, as well as those of Sanmina, the manufacturer of all of our products, are required toperform annual military reserve duty in Israel and may be called to active duty at any time under emergency circumstances. Although these call-ups have nothad a material impact on our operations or on Sanmina’s ability to manufacture our products, our operations and the operations of Sanmina could bedisrupted by such call-ups. Our sales may be adversely affected by boycotts of Israel. Several countries, principally in the Middle East, restrict doing business with Israel and Israeli companies, and additional countries may imposerestrictions on doing business with Israel and Israeli companies whether as a result of hostilities in the region or otherwise. In addition, there have beenincreased efforts by activists to cause companies and consumers to boycott Israeli goods based on Israeli government policies. Such actions, particularly ifthey become more widespread, may adversely impact our ability to sell our products.39Table of ContentsThe tax benefits that are available to us require us to continue to meet various conditions and may be terminated or reduced in the future, which couldincrease our costs and taxes. Some of our operations in Israel, referred to as “Beneficiary Enterprises,” carry certain tax benefits under the Israeli Law for the Encouragement ofCapital Investments, 5719-1959, or the Investment Law. Substantially all of our future income before taxes can be attributed to these programs. If we do notmeet the requirements for maintaining these benefits or if our assumptions regarding the key elements affecting our tax rates are rejected by the taxauthorities, they may be reduced or cancelled and the relevant operations would be subject to Israeli corporate tax at the standard rate. In addition to beingsubject to the standard corporate tax rate, we could be required to refund any tax benefits that we may receive in the future, plus interest and penaltiesthereon. Even if we continue to meet the relevant requirements, the tax benefits that our current “Beneficiary Enterprises” receive may not be continued inthe future at their current levels or at all. If these tax benefits were reduced or eliminated, the amount of taxes that we pay would likely increase, as all of ourIsraeli operations would consequently be subject to corporate tax at the standard rate, which could adversely affect our results of operations. Additionally, ifwe increase our activities outside of Israel, for example, by way of acquisitions, our increased activities may not be eligible for inclusion in Israeli tax benefitprograms. For a discussion of our current tax obligations, see Part 2. Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results ofOperations.” We have received Israeli government grants for certain of our research and development activities and we may receive additional grants in the future. Theterms of those grants restrict our ability to manufacture products or transfer technologies outside of Israel, and we may be required to pay penalties in suchcases or upon the sale of our company. From our inception through December 31, 2016, we received a total of $740,000 from the IIA. We may in the future apply to receive additionalgrants from the IIA to support our research and development activities. With respect to such grants we are committed to pay royalties at a rate of 3.0% to 3.5%on sales proceeds up to the total amount of grants received, linked to the dollar and bearing interest at an annual rate of LIBOR applicable to dollar deposits.Even after payment in full of these amounts, we will still be required to comply with the requirements of the Israeli Encouragement of Industrial Research andDevelopment Law, 1984, or the R&D Law, and related regulations, with respect to those past grants. When a company develops know-how, technology orproducts using IIA grants, the terms of these grants and the R&D Law restrict the transfer outside of Israel of such know-how, and the manufacturing ormanufacturing rights of such products, technologies or know-how, without the prior approval of the IIA. Therefore, if aspects of our technologies are deemedto have been developed with IIA funding, the discretionary approval of an IIA committee would be required for any transfer to third parties outside of Israel ofknow-how or manufacturing or manufacturing rights related to those aspects of such technologies. Furthermore, the IIA may impose certain conditions on anyarrangement under which it permits us to transfer technology or development out of Israel or may not grant such approvals at all. The transfer of IIA-supported technology or know-how outside of Israel may involve the payment of significant amounts to the IIA, depending uponthe value of the transferred technology or know-how, the amount of IIA support, the time of completion of the IIA-supported research project and otherfactors. These restrictions and requirements for payment may impair our ability to sell our technology assets outside of Israel or to outsource or transferdevelopment or manufacturing activities with respect to any product or technology outside of Israel. Furthermore, the consideration available to ourshareholders in a transaction involving the transfer outside of Israel of technology or know-how developed with IIA funding (such as a merger or similartransaction) may be reduced by any amounts that we are required to pay to the IIA.In addition to the above, any non-Israeli citizen, resident or entity that, among other things, (i) becomes a holder of 5% or more of our share capitalor voting rights, (ii) is entitled to appoint one or more of our directors or our chief executive officer or (iii) serves as one of our directors or as our chiefexecutive officer (including holders of 25% or more of the voting power, equity or the right to nominate directors in such direct holder, if applicable) isrequired to notify the IIA and undertake to comply with the rules and regulations applicable to the grant programs of the IIA, including the restrictions ontransfer described above. We may become subject to claims for remuneration or royalties for assigned service invention rights by our employees, which could result in litigation andadversely affect our business. A significant portion of our intellectual property has been developed by our employees in the course of their employment for us. Under the IsraeliPatent Law, 5727-1967, or the Patent Law, and recent decisions by the Israeli Supreme Court and the Israeli Compensation and Royalties Committee, a bodyconstituted under the Patent Law, employees may be entitled to remuneration for intellectual property that they develop for us unless they explicitly waiveany such rights, although the validity of any such waivers remains open to judicial review. Although we enter into agreements with our employees pursuantto which they agree that any inventions created in the scope of their employment or engagement are owned exclusively by us, we may face claims demandingremuneration. As a consequence of such claims, we could be required to pay additional remuneration or royalties to our current and former employees, or beforced to litigate such claims, which could negatively affect our business.40Table of Contents Provisions of Israeli law and our Articles of Association may delay, prevent or otherwise impede a merger with, or an acquisition of, us, even when theterms of such a transaction are favorable to us and our shareholders. Israeli corporate law regulates mergers, requires tender offers for acquisitions of shares above specified thresholds, requires special approvals fortransactions involving directors, officers or significant shareholders and regulates other matters that may be relevant to such types of transactions. Forexample, a tender offer for all of a company’s issued and outstanding shares can only be completed if the acquirer receives positive responses from theholders of at least 95% of the issued share capital. Completion of the tender offer also requires approval of a majority of the offerees that do not have apersonal interest in the tender offer, unless at least 98% of the company’s outstanding shares are tendered. Furthermore, the shareholders, including those whoindicated their acceptance of the tender offer (unless the acquirer stipulated in its tender offer that a shareholder that accepts the offer may not seek appraisalrights), may, at any time within six months following the completion of the tender offer, petition an Israeli court to alter the consideration for the acquisition. Our Articles of Association provide that our directors (other than external directors) are elected on a staggered basis, such that a potential acquirercannot readily replace our entire board of directors at a single annual general shareholder meeting. This could prevent a potential acquirer from receivingboard approval for an acquisition proposal that our board of directors opposes. Furthermore, Israeli tax considerations may make potential transactions unappealing to us or to our shareholders whose country of residence doesnot have a tax treaty with Israel exempting such shareholders from Israeli tax. For example, Israeli tax law does not recognize tax-free share exchanges to thesame extent as U.S. tax law. With respect to mergers involving an exchange of shares, Israeli tax law allows for tax deferral in certain circumstances but makesthe deferral contingent on the fulfillment of a number of conditions, including, in some cases, a holding period of two years from the date of the transactionduring which sales and dispositions of shares of the participating companies are subject to certain restrictions. Moreover, with respect to certain share swaptransactions, the tax deferral is limited in time, and when such time expires, the tax becomes payable even if no disposition of the shares has occurred. Theseand other similar provisions could delay, prevent or impede an acquisition of us or our merger with another company, even if such an acquisition or mergerwould be beneficial to us or to our shareholders.It may be difficult to enforce a judgment of a U.S. court against us, our officers and directors, to assert U.S. securities laws claims in Israel or to serveprocess on our officers and directors. We are incorporated in Israel. Although the majority of our directors and executive officers reside within the United States and most of the assets ofthese persons are also likely located within the United States, some of our directors and executive officers reside and may have the majority of their assetsoutside the United States. Additionally, most of our assets are located outside of the United States. Therefore, a judgment obtained against us, or those of ourdirectors and executive officers residing outside of the United States, including a judgment based on the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securitieslaws, may not be collectible in the United States and may not be enforced by an Israeli court. It also may be difficult for you to effect service of process in theUnited States on those directors and executive officers residing outside of the United States or to assert U.S. securities law claims in original actions institutedin Israel. Israeli courts may refuse to hear a claim based on an alleged violation of U.S. securities laws reasoning that Israel is not the most appropriate forumin which to bring such a claim. In addition, even if an Israeli court agrees to hear a claim, it may determine that Israeli law and not U.S. law is applicable to theclaim. If U.S. law is found to be applicable, the content of applicable U.S. law must be proven as a fact by expert witnesses, which can be a time-consumingand costly process. Certain matters of procedure will also be governed by Israeli law. There is little binding case law in Israel that addresses the mattersdescribed above. As a result of the difficulty associated with enforcing a judgment against us in Israel, you may be able to collect only limited, or may beunable to collect any, damages awarded by either a U.S. or foreign court. 41Table of ContentsYour rights and responsibilities as a shareholder will be governed by Israeli law which differs in some material respects from the rights and responsibilitiesof shareholders of U.S. companies. The rights and responsibilities of the holders of our ordinary shares are governed by our Articles of Association and by Israeli law. These rights andresponsibilities differ in some material respects from the rights and responsibilities of shareholders in U.S.-based corporations. In particular, a shareholder ofan Israeli company has a duty to act in good faith and in a customary manner in exercising its rights and performing its obligations towards the company andother shareholders, and to refrain from abusing its power in the company, including, among other things, in voting at a general meeting of shareholders onmatters such as amendments to a company’s articles of association, increases in a company’s authorized share capital, mergers and acquisitions and relatedparty transactions requiring shareholder approval. In addition, a shareholder who is aware that it possesses the power to determine the outcome of ashareholder vote or to appoint or prevent the appointment of a director or executive officer in the company has a duty of fairness toward the company. Thereis limited case law available to assist us in understanding the nature of this duty or the implications of these provisions. These provisions may be interpretedto impose additional obligations and liabilities on holders of our ordinary shares that are not typically imposed on shareholders of U.S. corporations.ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTSNone.ITEM 2. PROPERTIESOur corporate headquarters are located in Yokneam, Israel, our U.S. headquarters are located in Marlborough, Massachusetts, and our Europeanheadquarters are located in Berlin, Germany.All of our facilities are leased and we do not own any real property. The table below sets forth details of the square footage of our current leasedproperties, all of which are fully utilized. We have no material tangible fixed assets apart from the properties described below. Squarefeet(approximate)Marlborough, Massachusetts11,850Yokneam, Israel11,500Berlin, Germany775Total24,125We believe our facilities are adequate and suitable for our current needs.ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS Occasionally the Company is involved in various claims, lawsuits, regulatory examinations, investigations and other legal matters arising, for themost part, in the ordinary course of business. The outcome of litigation and other legal matters is inherently uncertain. In making a determination regardingaccruals, using available information, the Company evaluates the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome in legal or regulatory proceedings to which theCompany is a party and records a loss contingency when it is probable a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated.Where the Company determines an unfavorable outcome is not probable or reasonably estimable, the Company does not accrue for any potentiallitigation loss. These subjective determinations are based on the status of such legal or regulatory proceedings, the merits of our defenses and consultationwith legal counsel. Actual outcomes of these legal and regulatory proceedings may materially differ from the Company’s current estimates. It is possible thatresolution of one or more of the legal matters currently pending or threatened could result in losses material to the Company’s consolidated results ofoperations, liquidity or financial condition.As set forth below, between September 2016 and January 2017, eight substantially similar putative securities class actions were filed against theCompany. Four of these actions have been dismissed on procedural grounds and four are pending, including two actions which have been consolidated andone action brought by the plaintiffs whose actions were dismissed.42Table of Contents•Dismissed Actions: On September 20, November 3, November 9, and November 10, 2016, respectively, four putative class actions on behalf ofalleged shareholders that purchased or acquired the Company's ordinary shares pursuant and/or traceable to the registration statement used inconnection with the Company's IPO were commenced in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Mateo. The actions were filedagainst the Company, certain of the Company's current and former directors and officers, and the underwriters of the Company's IPO. We refer tothese actions as the California State Actions. The complaints in the California State Actions asserted various claims under the Securities Act. Eachof the California State Actions was dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction in January 2017.•Pending Actions:◦On or about October 31, 2016, a class action with claims substantially similar to the California State Actions was commenced in theMassachusetts Superior Court, Suffolk County, by a different plaintiff (Civ. Action No. 16-3336), alleging claims under Section 11 of theSecurities Act against the Company, certain of the Company's current and former directors and officers, and the underwriters of theCompany's IPO, and alleging claims under Section 15 of the Securities Act against the Company and certain of the Company's current andformer directors and officers.◦On or about November 30, 2016, a substantially similar class action was commenced in the Massachusetts Superior Court, Suffolk County,by a different plaintiff (Civ. Action No. 16-3670) alleging claims under Sections 11 and Section 15 of the Securities Act against the samedefendants as in the action commenced on October 31, 2016, and also alleging claims under Section 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act againstthe Company, certain of the Company's current and former directors and officers, and the underwriters of the Company's IPO. This actionwas ordered consolidated in the Massachusetts Superior Court, Suffolk County on January 9, 2017 with the action commenced on October31, 2016, and the two actions are referred to as the Consolidated Massachusetts State Court Actions.•On or about January 24, 2017, a substantially similar class action was commenced in the United States District Court for the NorthernDistrict of California (Case No. 3:17-cv-362) alleging the same claims against the same defendants as in the action commenced onNovember 30, 2016, except that the Section 15 claim was not asserted against the underwriters, and the Section 11 and Section 15 claimswere also asserted against certain entities referred to as the "Venture Capital Defendants", who are alleged in the complaint to havebeneficially owned, directly or indirectly, approximately 51% of the Company’s stock upon the closing of the IPO. This action is referredto as the California Federal Court Action.•On or about January 31, 2017, a substantially similar class action was commenced in the United States District Court for the District ofMassachusetts (Case No. 1:17-cv-10169) by the same plaintiffs who commenced the California State Court Actions, and one additionalplaintiff, alleging claims under Section 11 and 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act against the Company, certain of the Company's current andformer directors and officers, and the underwriters of the Company's IPO, and alleging claims under Section 15 of the Securities Act againstcertain of the Company's current and former directors and officers. This action is referred to as the Massachusetts Federal Court Action.The plaintiffs in the Consolidated Massachusetts State Court Actions are expected to file a consolidated amended complaint on or about March 13, 2017.The Company has not yet responded to the complaints in the California Federal Court Action and the Massachusetts Federal Court Action. The complaints in all of the actions listed above allege that the Company's registration statement used in connection with its IPO failed to disclosethat the Company was unprepared or unable to comply with certain regulatory special controls and to provide the FDA with a post-market surveillance studyon the Company's ReWalk Personal device, and that, as a result of such alleged omission, the plaintiffs suffered damages. The Company believes that theallegations made in the complaints are without merit and intends to defend itself vigorously against the complaints relating to the four pending actions.Based on information currently available and the early stage of the litigation, the Company is unable to reasonably estimate a possible loss or rangeof possible losses, if any, with regard to these lawsuits; therefore, no litigation reserve has been recorded in the Company's consolidated balance sheets as ofDecember 31, 2016. The Company will continue to evaluate information as it becomes known and will record an estimate for losses at the time or times whenit is probable that a loss will be incurred and the amount of the loss is reasonably estimable.For more information, see the information in Note 2t and Note 7e to the Company’s consolidated financial statements set forth in "Part II, Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" of this annual report.43ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.Not applicable.Table of ContentsPART IIITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITYSECURITIES Market InformationOur ordinary shares began trading publicly on the Nasdaq Global Market on September 12, 2014 under the symbol “RWLK”. The following tablesets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sales prices of our ordinary shares as reported by the Nasdaq Global Market. High Low2016 Fourth quarter 2016$6.50 $2.55Third quarter 2016$7.85 $5.55Second quarter 2016$10.79 $6.00First quarter 2016$15.81 $7.412015 Fourth quarter 2015$17.40 $5.55Third quarter 2015$11.90 $7.20Second quarter 2015$14.65 $10.35First quarter 2015$22.74 $12.032014 Fourth quarter 2014$34.29 $18.01Third quarter 2014 (beginning on September 12, 2014)$43.71 $11.50As of February 1, 2017, there were 31 record holders of our ordinary shares.Dividend PolicyWe have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our ordinary shares. We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeablefuture. We currently intend to retain future earnings, if any, to finance operations and expand our business. Any future determination relating to our dividendpolicy will be made at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on a number of factors, including future earnings, capital requirements,financial condition and future prospects and other factors our board of directors may deem relevant. The distribution of dividends may also be limited byIsraeli law, which permits the distribution of dividends only out of retained earnings or otherwise upon the permission of an Israeli court.Israeli Taxes Applicable to U.S. HoldersA non-Israeli resident who derives capital gains from the sale of shares in an Israeli resident company that were purchased after the company waslisted for trading on a stock exchange outside of Israel will be exempt from Israeli tax so long as the shares were not held through a permanent establishmentthat the non-resident maintains in Israel. However, non-Israeli corporations will not be entitled to the foregoing exemption if Israeli residents (i) have acontrolling interest of more than 25% in such non-Israeli corporation or (ii) are the beneficiaries of, or are entitled to, 25% or more of the revenues or profitsof such non-Israeli corporation, whether directly or indirectly. Such exemption is not applicable to a person whose gains from selling or otherwise disposingof the shares are deemed to be a business income. Additionally, under the United States-Israel Tax Treaty, or the treaty, the disposition of shares by ashareholder who (i) is a U.S. resident (for purposes of the treaty), (ii) holds the shares as a capital asset, and (iii) is entitled to claim the benefits afforded tosuch person by the treaty, is generally exempt from Israeli capital gains tax. Such exemption will not apply if: (i) the capital gain arising from the dispositioncan be attributed to a permanent establishment in Israel; (ii) the shareholder holds, directly or indirectly, shares representing 10% or more of the votingcapital during any part of the 12-month period preceding the disposition, subject to certain conditions; or (iii) such U.S. resident is an individual and waspresent in Israel for 183 days or more during the relevant taxable year. In such case, the sale, exchange or disposition of our ordinary shares should be subjectto Israeli tax, to the extent applicable; however, under the treaty, the taxpayer would be permitted to claim a credit for such taxes against the U.S. federalincome tax imposed with respect to such sale, exchange or disposition, subject to the limitations under U.S. law applicable to foreign tax credits. The treatydoes not relate to U.S. state or local taxes.45Table of ContentsIn some instances where our shareholders may be liable for Israeli tax on the sale of their ordinary shares, the payment of the consideration may besubject to the withholding of Israeli tax at source. If the above exemptions from capital gains tax are not available, individuals will be subject to a 25% taxrate on real capital gains derived from the sale of shares as long as the individual is not a substantial shareholder of the corporation issuing the shares (inwhich case the individual will be subject to a 30% tax rate), and corporations will be subject to a 25% corporate tax rate for 2016. Under an amendmentenacted in December 2016 to the Israel Income Tax Ordinance 1961-5721, or the ordinance, the corporate tax rate will decrease to 24% for 2017 and 23% for2018 and thereafter. A substantial shareholder is generally a person who alone or together with such person’s relative or another person who collaborates withsuch person on a permanent basis, holds, directly or indirectly, at least 10% of any of the means of control of the corporation, including the right to vote,receive profits, nominate a director or an executive officer, receive assets upon liquidation, or order someone who holds any of the aforesaid rights how to act,regardless of the source of such right. A substantial shareholder will be subject to tax at a rate of 30% in respect of capital gains derived from the sale of sharesissued by a corporation in which he or she is a substantial shareholder. The determination of whether the individual is a substantial shareholder will be madeon the date on which the securities are sold. In addition, the individual will be deemed to be a substantial shareholder if at any time during the 12 monthspreceding the date of sale he or she was a substantial shareholder.Dividends paid on publicly traded shares, like our ordinary shares, to non-Israeli residents are generally subject to Israeli withholding tax at a rate of25%, unless a different rate is provided under an applicable tax treaty, provided that a certificate from the Israeli Tax Authority allowing for a reducedwithholding tax rate is obtained in advance. Under the treaty, the maximum rate of tax withheld at source in Israel on dividends paid to a holder of ourordinary shares who is a U.S. resident (for purposes of the treaty) is 25%. The treaty provides for reduced tax rates on dividends if (a) the shareholder is a U.S.corporation holding at least 10% of our issued voting power during the part of the tax year that precedes the date of payment of the dividend and held suchminimal percentage during the whole of its prior tax year, and (b) not more than 25% of the Israeli company’s gross income consists of interest or dividends,other than dividends or interest received from subsidiary corporations or corporations 50% or more of the outstanding voting shares of which is owned by theIsraeli company. The reduced treaty rate, if applicable, is 15% in the case of dividends paid from income derived from Beneficiary or Preferred Enterprise or12.5% otherwise. We cannot assure you that in the event we declare a dividend we will designate the income out of which the dividend is paid in a mannerthat will reduce shareholders’ tax liability. If the dividend is attributable partly to income derived from a Beneficiary or Preferred Enterprise and partly toother sources of income, the withholding rate will be a blended rate reflecting the relative portions of the two types of income. U.S. residents who are subjectto Israeli withholding tax on a dividend may be entitled to a credit or deduction for U.S. federal income tax purposes in the amount of the taxes withheld.As of January 1, 2013, shareholders who are individuals with a taxable income that exceeds NIS 800,000 in a tax year (linked to the consumer priceindex each year, which equaled NIS 803,520 in the 2016 tax year) will be subject to an additional tax, referred to as High Income Tax, at the rate of 2% ontheir taxable income for such tax year that is in excess of such threshold. For this purpose, taxable income includes taxable capital gains from the sale of ourshares and taxable income from dividend distributions. Under an amendment enacted in December 2016 to the ordinance, for 2017 and thereafter the rate ofHigh Income Tax will increase to 3% and will be applicable to annual income exceeding NIS 640,000 (linked to the consumer price index each year).If the above exemptions from capital gains tax are not available, corporations will be subject to the corporate tax rate (24% in 2017 and 23%thereafter) on capital gains derived from the sale of shares.Stock Performance Graph The following stock performance graph represents the cumulative total shareholder return for the period September 12, 2014 (the date upon whichtrading of our ordinary shares commenced) through December 31, 2016 for our ordinary shares, compared to the Nasdaq Composite Index and the NasdaqMedical Equipment Index. The returns shown in the graph below may not be indicative of future performance. 46Table of Contents *$100 invested on 9/12/14 in ordinary shares of ReWalk or in the applicable indexes, including reinvestment of dividends.The above stock performance graph shall not be deemed to be soliciting material or to be filed with the SEC under the Securities Act and theExchange Act except to the extent that we specifically request that such information be treated as soliciting material or specifically incorporate it byreference into a filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act.Recent Sales of Unregistered SecuritiesAs described below under Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and CapitalResources,” on December 30, 2015, we entered into the Loan Agreement, with Kreos, pursuant to which Kreos extended a line of credit to us in the amount of$20.0 million. In connection with a drawdown of $12.0 million under the Loan Agreement, we issued to Kreos a warrant, to purchase up to 119,295 of ourordinary shares at an exercise price of $9.64 per share, which represented the average of the closing prices of our ordinary shares for the thirty-day calendarperiod prior to the date of the issuance of the warrant, subject to adjustment as set forth in the warrant. On December 28, 2016, we drew down the remaining$8.0 million available under the Loan Agreement. In connection with such drawdown, on December 28, 2016, we increased the amount of the warrant issuedto Kreos from $1.15 million to $1.61 million, or by $460,000. In its new amount, the warrant represents the right to purchase up to 167,012 of our ordinaryshares. The increase was based on the terms of the warrant, which provide that the amount of the warrant will be increased by 5.75% of any additionaldrawdowns.No underwriters or underwriter discounts or commissions were involved in these issuances. We believe that each of the initial issuance of the warranton December 30, 2015, and the issuance of the warrant with the increased principal amount on December 28, 2016, was exempt from registration under theSecurities Act in reliance on Regulation S or Regulation D under the Securities Act or pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act regarding transactions byan issuer involving offers and sales of securities outside the United States or not involving a public offering. The recipient of the warrant represented itsintention to acquire the warrant and the ordinary shares underlying the warrant for investment only and not with a view to, or in connection with, the sale ordistribution thereof. No general advertising or solicitation was used in selling the securities and the warrant was offered only to Kreos, a non-U.S. entity, in anoffshore transaction outside the United States.Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated PurchasersNone.47Table of ContentsITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA The following table presents our selected historical consolidated financial data, which is derived from our consolidated financial statements, whichhave been prepared in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, or U.S. GAAP. The selected consolidated statements of operationsdata for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 and the selected consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 are derivedfrom our audited consolidated financial statements set forth in “Part II. Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this annual report. Theselected consolidated statement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 and the selected consolidated balancesheet data as of December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 has been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements not included in this annual report.You should read the following selected consolidated financial data in conjunction with “Part II. Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis ofFinancial Condition and Results of Operations,” and it is qualified in its entirety by, reference to our consolidated financial statements and the related notesset forth in “Part II. Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this annual report. The historical results set forth below are not necessarilyindicative of the results to be expected in future periods.48Table of Contents Year endedDecember 31 (In thousands, except share and per share data) 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012Revenues$5,869 $3,746 $3,951 $1,588 $972Cost of revenues5,133 3,532 4,106 2,017 983Expense related to settlement of BIRD Foundation grants (seeNote 7c) — 466 — — Gross profit (loss)736 214 (621) (429) (11) Operating expenses: Research and development, net9,028 5,937 8,563 2,463 1,757Sales and marketing13,961 13,056 7,389 4,091 2,334General and administration8,188 6,395 3,352 1,762 1,657 Total operating expenses31,177 25,388 19,304 8,316 5,748 Operating loss(30,441) (25,174) (19,925) (8,745) (5,759)Financial expenses, net2,059 188 1,698 3,410 878 Loss before income taxes(32,500) (25,362) (21,623) (12,155) (6,637)Income taxes3 53 45 22 21 Net loss$(32,503) $(25,415) $(21,668) $(12,177) $(6,658) Net loss per ordinary share, basic and diluted$(2.47) $(2.10) $(6.34) $(74.53) $(41.26) Weighted average number of shares used in computing net lossper ordinary share, basic and diluted13,178,107 12,115,038 3,766,694 185,688 185,688 As of December 31, (in thousands) 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012Balance Sheet Data: Cash and cash equivalents$23,678 $17,869 $41,829 $8,860 $769Total assets31,763 25,574 47,665 11,059 2,094 Accumulated deficit(106,492) (73,989) (48,574) (26,906) (14,729)Total shareholders’ equity$8,260 $20,920 $43,853 $5,631 $(2,264)_____________________________(1)Net loss per ordinary share, basic and diluted, is calculated by dividing our net loss excluding dividends accrued on our convertible preferred sharesoutstanding during the period presented by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period presented. See Note 2r to ourconsolidated financial statements set forth in "Part II. Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" of this annual report.49Table of ContentsITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONSThe following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with “Part I. Item 6. Selected Financial Data” and our consolidated financialstatements and the related notes included elsewhere in this annual report. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that are based on ourmanagement’s current expectations, estimates and projections for our business, which are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. Our actual resultsmay differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of many factors, including those set forth under “Special NoteRegarding Forward-Looking Statements and “Part I. Item 1A. Risk Factors.”OverviewWe are an innovative medical device that derives revenue from selling the ReWalk Personal and ReWalk Rehabilitation exoskeleton devices thatallow individuals with paraplegia the ability to stand and walk once again. Since obtaining FDA clearance in June 2014 we have continued to increase ourfocus on selling the Personal device through third party payors in the U.S. and Germany, and through distributors in other parts of the world.We expect to generate revenues from a combination of third-party payors, self-payors and institutions. While no uniform policy of coverage andreimbursement by third-party payors currently exists for electronic exoskeleton technologies such as ReWalk, we plan to pursue various paths to obtainbroad commercial and government reimbursement coverage. In December 2015, the VA issued a national policy for the evaluation, training and procurementof ReWalk Personal exoskeleton systems for all qualifying veterans across the United States. The VA policy, is the first national coverage policy in theUnited States for qualifying individuals who have suffered spinal cord injury. Additionally, to date several private insurers in the United States haveprovided reimbursement for ReWalk in certain cases. For more information regarding reimbursement of our products, see “Part I. Item 1. Business—ThirdParty Reimbursement and “Part I. Item 1. Business — Other Funding Sources.”We have incurred net losses and negative cash flows from operations since inception and anticipate this to continue in the near term. As previouslyannounced, we have set a goal to reduce total operating expenses in 2017 by up to 30% as compared to 2016. These reductions will be achieved through acombination of targeted savings, including the completion of specific projects focused on quality improvement initiatives and efforts to reduce overallproduct cost, a realignment of and reduction in staffing to match the Company’s 2017 business goals, and a reduction in other corporate spending. TheCompany plans to focus its resources mainly on reimbursement efforts, clinical studies to expand data on the effectiveness of the Spinal Cord Injury products,field sales, service and training efforts for the ReWalk system and the commercialization pathway for the Stroke Softsuit program.Components of Our Statements of OperationsRevenuesWe currently rely, and in the future will rely, on sales and rentals of our ReWalk systems and related service contracts and extended warranties forour revenue. Our revenue is generated from a combination of third-party payors, institutions and self-payors. Payments for our products by third party payorshave been made primarily through case-by-case determinations. Third-party payors include, without limitation, private insurance plans and managed careprograms, government programs including the US Department of Veterans Affairs, worker's compensation and Medicare and Medicaid. We expect that third-party payors will be an increasingly important source of revenue in the future. In December 2015, the VA issued a national policy for the evaluation, trainingand procurement of ReWalk Personal exoskeleton systems for all qualifying veterans across the United States. The VA policy is the first national coveragepolicy in the United States for qualifying individuals who have suffered spinal cord injury.All of our ReWalk systems are covered by a two-year warranty from the date of purchase, which is included in the purchase price. We offer customersthe ability to purchase, any time during the initial warranty period, an extended warranty for up to three additional years. Both warranties cover all elementsof the ReWalk system, including the batteries, other than normal wear and tear.Revenues are presented net of the amounts of any provision we record for expected future product returns.50Table of ContentsCost of Revenues and Gross Profit (Loss)Cost of revenue consists primarily of systems purchased from our outsourced manufacturer, Sanmina, salaries, personnel costs including non-cashshare based compensation, associated with manufacturing and inventory management, training and inspection, warranty and service costs, shipping andhandling and manufacturing startup and transition costs. Prior to the first quarter of 2014, when we completed the manufacturing transition to Sanmina, costof revenues also included costs of components, compensation related costs associated with manufacturing and costs to transition manufacturing to Sanmina.Cost of revenues also includes royalties and expenses related to royalty-bearing research and development grants and sales and marketing grants.In the future we expect our unit cost to decrease as our sales increase due to product cost improvements including economies of scale realized inconnection with larger quantities and increased efficiency.Our gross profit (loss) and gross margin as a percentage of sales is influenced by a number of factors, including primarily the volume and price of ourproducts sold and fluctuations in our cost of revenues. Certain one-time expenses also impact gross margins including a 2014 expense relating to the earlysettlement, at a discount, of a royalty-bearing grant to the BIRD Foundation and 2015 and 2016 costs to transition manufacturing to the ReWalk Personal 6.0model. We expect gross profit (loss) as a percentage of sales will improve in the future as we increase our sales volumes and decrease the productmanufacturing costs. Operating ExpensesResearch and Development Expenses, NetResearch and development expenses, net, consist primarily of salaries, related personnel costs including share-based compensation, supplies,materials and expenses related to product design and development, clinical studies, regulatory submissions, patent costs, sponsored research costs and otherexpenses related to our product development and research programs. We expense all research and development expenses as they are incurred. We believe thatcontinued investment in research and development is crucial to attaining our strategic product objectives.Research and development expenses are presented net of the amount of any grants we receive for research and development in the period in whichwe receive the grant. We previously received grants and other funding from the BIRD Foundation and the Israel Innovation Authority, or “IIA”, (formerlyknown as the Office of the Chief Scientist). Certain of those grants require us to pay royalties on sales of ReWalk systems, which are recorded as cost ofrevenues. We may receive additional funding from these entities or others in the future. See “Grants and Other Funding” below.Sales and Marketing ExpensesOur sales and marketing expenses, consist primarily of salaries, related personnel costs including share-based compensation for sales, marketing andreimbursement personnel, travel, marketing and public relations activities and consulting costs. Also included in the sales and marketing expenses are thecosts associated with our reimbursement activities in the United States and Germany.General and Administrative ExpensesOur general and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries, related personnel costs including share-based compensation for ouradministrative, finance, and general management personnel, professional services and insurance.Financial Income (Expenses), NetFinancial income and expenses consist of bank commissions, foreign exchange gains and losses, interest earned on investments in short termdeposits, and revaluation of the fair value of warrants to purchase our preferred shares and expenses related to our convertible loans, which were issued in2013 and are no longer outstanding.Warrants to purchase our convertible preferred shares were classified as a liability on our consolidated balance sheet at fair value. The warrants weresubject to revaluation at each balance sheet date and any change in fair value is recognized as a component of financial income (expense), net, on ourconsolidated statements of operations. All such warrants were exercised, expired or converted into warrants to purchase ordinary shares in connection withour initial public offering, and therefore as of December 31, 2014 and for periods beginning with the fourth quarter of 2014, we no longer record any liabilityin respect of them on our balance sheet or financial expenses in respect of them on our statement of operations.Interest income consists of interest earned on our cash and cash equivalent balances. Interest expense consists of interest accrued on, and certainother costs with respect to any indebtedness. Foreign currency exchange changes reflect gains or losses related to transactions denominated in currenciesother than the U.S. dollar.51Table of ContentsAs described above in Item 5. “Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities –Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities”, on December 30, 2015 we entered into the Loan Agreement with Kreos pursuant to which Kreos extended a line ofcredit to us in the amount of $20.0 million. In connection with the Loan Agreement we issued to Kreos a warrant to purchase up to 119,295 of our ordinaryshares at an exercise price of $9.64 as we drew down $12 million under the Loan Agreement, which amount was increased to167,012 ordinary shares upon anadditional drawdown of $8 million. For further discussion of the Loan Agreement with Kreos, see “-Liquidity and Capital Resources” below and also Note 6to our audited consolidated financial statements below.Taxes on IncomeAs of December 31, 2016, we had not yet generated taxable income in Israel. As of that date, our net operating loss carry forwards for Israeli taxpurposes amounted to approximately $83.8 million. After we utilize our net operating loss carry forwards, we are eligible for certain tax benefits in Israelunder the Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments, 1959. Our benefit period currently ends ten years after the year in which we first have taxableincome in Israel provided that the benefit period will not extend beyond 2024.Our taxable income generated outside of Israel will be subject to the regular corporate tax rate in the applicable jurisdictions. As a result, oureffective tax rate will be a function of the relative proportion of our taxable income that is generated in those locations compared to our overall net income.Grants and Other FundingBIRD Foundation and AO&PIn July 2009, we entered into a grant agreement with the BIRD Foundation and Allied Orthotics & Prosthetics Inc., or the AO&P. AO&P was thedistributor of our products at the time. We received $500,000 and AO&P received $60,000. The agreement with the BIRD Foundation required us to pay aroyalty at a rate of 5% on sales of ReWalk systems and related services. The repayment requirement is equal to the amount of the grant multiplied by anincreasing contractual percentage in an amount up to 150%.Under the agreement AO&P is responsible for repayment of its grant. However, pursuant to the agreement, we are required to make any payments onwhich AO&P defaults. As of December 31, 2015 and through December 31, 2016, there was no contingent liability to the BIRD Foundation.In 2014, we recorded an expense of $466,000 as a settlement for the prepayment, at a discount, of amounts due under the agreement.Israel Innovation Authority (formerly known as Office of the Chief Scientist)From our inception through December 31, 2016 we have received a total of $740,000 in funding from the IIA, $340,000 of which are royalty-bearinggrants, while $400,000 were received in consideration for an investment in our preferred shares. Out of the royalty-bearing grants received, we have paidroyalties to the IIA in the total amount of $50,000. We may apply to receive additional grants to support our research and development activities in 2017.The agreements with IIA require us to pay royalties at a rate of 3% to 3.5% on sales of ReWalk systems and related services up to the total amount of fundingreceived, linked to the dollar and bearing interest at an annual rate of LIBOR applicable to dollar deposits. If we transfer IIA-supported technology or know-how outside of Israel, we will be liable for additional payments to IIA depending upon the value of the transferred technology or know-how, the amount ofIIA support, the time of completion of the IIA-supported research project and other factors. As of December 31, 2016, the aggregate contingent liability to theIIA was $300,000.52Table of ContentsResults of OperationsYear Ended December 31, 2016 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2015RevenuesOur revenues for 2016 and 2015 were as follows (dollars in thousands, except unit amounts) Years Ended December 31, 2016 2015Personal units placed109 53Rehabilitation units placed10 20Total units placed119 73Personal unit revenues$5,197 $2,766Rehabilitation unit revenues$672 $980Revenues$5,869 $3,746Revenues increased $2.1 million, or 57%, during 2016 compared to 2015 explained by our increased sales of ReWalk Personal devices of $2.4million, or 88%, derived primarily from 22 ReWalk Personal devices placed with the VA for use in the VA’s clinical studies. This increase also reflects 51positive reimbursement coverage decisions in 2016 compared to 23 in 2015. Revenues from ReWalk Rehabilitation units decreased by $308 thousand, or31% during 2016 compared to 2015, primarily driven by the personal market and third-party payors.In the future we expect our growth to be driven by sales of our ReWalk Personal device to third-party payors as we plan to focus our resources onreimbursement policies with third-party payors.Gross Profit (Loss)Our gross profit (loss) for 2016 and 2015 were as follows (in thousands): Years Ended December 31, 2016 2015Gross profit$736 $214Gross profit was 13% of revenue for 2016, compared to gross profit of 6% of revenue for 2015. The increase in gross profit was driven by the increasein units sales, as described in "Revenues" above, partially offset by increased service costs and personnel and personnel-related costs.We expect our gross profit to gradually improve as we increase revenue and lower our unit manufacturing costs through specific cost reductionprojects and economies of scale.Research and Development Expenses, NetOur research and development expenses, net for 2016 and 2015 were as follows (in thousands): Years Ended December 31, 2016 2015Research and development expenses, net$9,028 $5,937Research and development expenses, net, increased $3.1 million, or 52%, during 2016 compared to 2015. The increase in expenses was primarilyattributable to costs associated with the License Agreement and Collaboration Agreement with Harvard to develop the “soft suit” exoskeleton, increasedpersonnel and personnel-related expenses and increased expenses for our 522 post-market surveillance study.We expect to focus our research and development expenses in the near future on our ReWalk soft suit exoskeleton for individuals who have suffereda stroke, as well as continue to devote resources for developing the next generation of our current products.53Table of ContentsSales and Marketing ExpensesOur sales and marketing expenses for 2016 and 2015 were as follows (in thousands): Years Ended December 31, 2016 2015Sales and marketing expenses$13,961 $13,056Sales and marketing expenses increased $905 thousand, or 7%, during 2016 compared to 2015. This increase is attributable to an increase inpersonnel and personnel-related costs, as well as reimbursement related costs for expanding the commercialization of the ReWalk Personal device.In the near term our sales and marketing expenses are expected to be driven by our commercialization efforts and reimbursement for the ReWalkPersonal device as we continue to pursue insurance claims on a case- by- case basis and invest in efforts to expand coverage.General and Administrative ExpensesOur general and administrative expenses for 2016 and 2015 were as follows (in thousands): Years Ended December 31, 2016 2015General and administrative$8,188 $6,395General and administrative expenses increased $1.8 million, or 28%, during 2016 compared to 2015. The increase is primarily attributable topersonnel and personnel-related costs, professional services and legal expenses.Financial Expenses, NetOur financial expenses, net for 2016 and 2015 were as follows (in thousands): Years Ended December 31, 2016 2015Financial expenses, net$2,059 $188Financial expenses, net, increased $1.9 million, or 995% during 2016 compared to 2015. This increase is mainly attributable to interest expenserelated to the Loan Agreement with Kreos.Income TaxOur income tax for 2016 and 2015 were as follows (in thousands): Years Ended December 31, 2016 2015Income tax$3 $53Income taxes decreased $50 thousand or 94% during 2016 compared to 2015. This decrease is mainly related to the utilization of tax benefits.54Table of ContentsYear Ended December 31, 2015 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2014RevenuesOur revenues for 2015 and 2014 were as follows (dollars in thousands, except unit amounts): Years Ended December 31, 2015 2014Personal units placed53 43Rehabilitation units placed20 31Total units placed73 74Personal unit revenues$2,766 $2,191Rehabilitation unit revenues$980 $1,760Revenues$3,746 $3,951Revenues decreased $205 thousand, or 5%, during 2015 compared to 2014. Increased sales of the Personal devices of $575 thousand, or 26%, wereoffset by a decrease in sales of Rehabilitation devices by $780 thousand, or 44%. During 2015 our sales transitioned to focus on third party payors of ourPersonal devices, compared to 2014 when initial demand from FDA clearance in June 2014 drove a majority of self funded and donated Personal device sales.Gross Profit (Loss)Our gross profit (loss) for 2015 and 2014 were as follows (in thousands): Years Ended December 31, 2015 2014Gross profit (loss)$214 $(621)Gross profit was 6% of revenue for the year 2015, compared to gross loss of 16% of revenue for the year 2014. The increase in gross profit is drivenby the manufacturing economies of scale which resulted from the completing of our process of transitioning all manufacturing to Sanmina in the second halfof 2014, partially offset by costs associated with the transition of that manufacturing with respect to the ReWalk Personal 6.0 in 2015. Additionally, in thefourth quarter of 2014 we incurred a one-time charge related to the early settlement, at a discount, of a royalty-bearing grant from the BIRD Foundation in theamount of $466 thousand.Research and Development Expenses, NetOur research and development expenses, net for 2015 and 2014 were as follows (in thousands): Years Ended December 31, 2015 2014Research and development expenses, net$5,937 $8,563Research and development expenses, net, decreased $2.6 million, or 31%, during 2015 compared to 2014. The decrease in expenses is attributableto a one-time, non-cash, share-based compensation award to our founder at the time of our initial public offering in 2014, which is offset by increasedpersonnel and personnel-related costs related to regulatory, quality and research and development activities during 2015.55Table of ContentsSales and Marketing ExpensesOur sales and marketing expenses for 2015 and 2014 were as follows (in thousands): Years Ended December 31, 2015 2014Sales and marketing expenses$13,056 $7,389Sales and marketing expenses increased $5.7 million, or 77%, during 2015 compared to 2014. This increase is attributable to an increase inpersonnel and personnel-related costs and marketing and reimbursement related costs as we expanded commercialization of the ReWalk Personal andRehabilitation systems.General and Administrative ExpensesOur general and administrative expenses for 2015 and 2014 were as follows (in thousands): Years Ended December 31, 2015 2014General and administrative$6,395 $3,352General and administrative expenses increased $3.0 million, or 91%, during 2015 compared to 2014. The increase in expenses is primarilyattributable to personnel and personnel-related costs, professional services and other expenses related to our being a publicly traded company for the first fullyear.Financial Expenses, NetOur financial expenses, net for 2015 and 2014 were as follows (in thousands): Years Ended December 31, 2015 2014Financial expenses, net$188 $1,698Financial expenses, net, decreased $1.5 million, or 89% during 2015 compared to 2014. This decrease is attributable mainly to the revaluation of thefair value of warrants to purchase preferred shares and the issuance of convertible preferred shares and warrants to purchase convertible preferred shares during2014.Income TaxOur income tax for 2015 and 2014 were as follows (in thousands): Years Ended December 31, 2015 2014Income tax$53 $45Income taxes increased $8 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2015, compared to the year ended December 31, 2014.56Table of ContentsCritical Accounting PoliciesOur consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles. The preparation ofour financial statements requires us to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that can affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure ofcontingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Webase our estimates, judgments and assumptions on historical experience and other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances.Materially different results can occur as circumstances change and additional information becomes known. Besides the estimates identified above that areconsidered critical, we make many other accounting estimates in preparing our financial statements and related disclosures. See Note 2 to our auditedconsolidated financial statements presented elsewhere in this annual report for a description of the significant accounting policies that we used to prepare ourconsolidated financial statements. The critical accounting policies that were impacted by the estimates, judgments and assumptions used in the preparationof our consolidated financial statements are discussed below.Revenue RecognitionWe recognize revenues in accordance with ASC 605, “Revenue Recognition,” when delivery has occurred, persuasive evidence of an agreementexists, the fee is fixed and determinable, collectability is reasonably assured and no further obligations exist. Provisions are made at the time of revenuerecognition for any applicable warranty cost expected to be incurred. The timing for revenue recognition among the various products and customers isdependent upon satisfaction of such criteria and generally varies from either shipment or delivery to the customer depending on the specific shipping termsof a given transaction, as stipulated in the agreement with each customer. Other than pricing terms which may differ due to the different volumes of purchasesbetween distributors and end-users, there are no material differences in the terms and arrangements involving direct and indirect customers. Our products soldthrough agreements with distributors are non-exchangeable, non-refundable, non-returnable and without any rights of price protection or stock rotation.Accordingly, we consider all the distributors as end-users. We generally do not grant a right of return for our products. There have been a few occasions inwhich we experienced a return of our products. Therefore, we record reductions to revenue for expected future product returns based on our historicalexperience.For the majority of sales of Rehabilitation systems, we include training and consider the elements in the arrangement to be a single unit ofaccounting. In accordance with ASC 605, we have concluded that the training is essential to the functionality of our systems. Therefore, we recognizerevenue for the system and training only after delivery, in accordance with the agreement delivery terms, to the customer and after the training has beencompleted, once all other revenue recognition criteria have been met. For sales of Personal systems to end users, and for sales of Personal or Rehabilitationsystems to third party distributors, we do not provide training to the end user as this training is completed by the rehabilitation centers or by the distributorthat have previously completed the ReWalk Training program. In certain cases, when product arrangements are bundled with an extended warranty, theseparation of the extended warranty falls under the scope of ASC 605- 20-25-1 through 25-6, and the separate price of the extended warranty stated in theagreement is deferred and recognized ratably over the extended warranty period. Deferred revenue includes primarily unearned amounts received in respect ofservice contracts but not yet recognized as revenues. The Company also offers a rent-to-purchase option for its ReWalk Personal device. Those transactionsprovide potential customers the option to lease the device for a short term, after which they can choose whether to purchase it. In such cases, the Companyrecognizes revenues over the period of the rent once all other revenue criteria are met.Share-Based Compensation – Option ValuationsWe account for share-based compensation in accordance with ASC No. 718, “Compensation-Stock Compensation.” ASC No. 718 requirescompanies to estimate the fair value of equity-based payment awards on the date of grant using an Option-Pricing Model, or OPM. The value of the portion ofthe award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as an expense over the requisite service periods in our consolidated statements of operations.We selected the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model as the most appropriate method for determining the estimated fair value of options. Theresulting cost of an equity incentive award is recognized as an expense over the requisite service period of the award, which is usually the vesting period. Werecognize compensation expense over the vesting period using the straight-line method and classify these amounts in the consolidated financial statementsbased on the department to which the related employee reports.The determination of the grant date fair value of options using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model is affected by estimates andassumptions regarding a number of complex and subjective variables. These variables include the expected volatility of our share price over the expectedterm of the options, share option exercise and cancellation behaviors, risk-free interest rates and expected dividends, which are estimated as follows:Risk-free Interest Rate. The risk-free interest rate is based on the yield from U.S. Treasury zero-coupon bonds with a term equivalent to thecontractual life of the options.57Table of ContentsDividend Yield. We have never declared or paid any cash dividends and do not presently plan to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future.Consequently, we used an expected dividend yield of zero.Expected Volatility. We estimated the expected share price volatility for our ordinary shares by considering the historic price volatility for industrypeers based on price observations over a period equivalent to the expected term of the share option grants. Industry peers consist of public companies in themedical device and healthcare industries. We intend to continue to consistently apply this process using the same or similar industry peers until a sufficientamount of historical information regarding the volatility of our ordinary share price becomes available, or unless circumstances change such that theidentified companies are no longer similar to us, in which case, more suitable companies whose share prices are publicly available would be utilized in thecalculation.Expected Term. The expected term of options granted represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding, and isdetermined based on the simplified method in accordance with ASC No. 718-10-S99-1 (SAB No. 110), as adequate historical experience is not available toprovide a reasonable estimate. ASC No. 718 requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actualforfeitures differ from those estimates. Income TaxesAs part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements, we are required to estimate our taxes in each of the jurisdictions in whichwe operate. We account for income taxes in accordance with ASC Topic 740, “Income Taxes,” or ASC Topic 740. ASC Topic 740 prescribes the use of anasset and liability method whereby deferred tax asset and liability account balances are determined based on the difference between book value and the taxbases of assets and liabilities and carryforward tax losses. Deferred taxes are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that are expected to be in effectwhen the differences are expected to reverse. We exercise judgment and provide a valuation allowance, if necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to theirestimated realizable value if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. We have established a fullvaluation allowance with respect to our deferred tax assets.Deferred tax assets are classified as short or long-term based on the classification of the related asset or liability for financial reporting, or accordingto the expected reversal dates of the specific temporary differences, if not related to an asset or liability for financial reporting. We account for uncertain taxpositions in accordance with ASC 740 and recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position willbe sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statementsfrom such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement.Accordingly, we report a liability for unrecognized tax benefits resulting from uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. Werecognize interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits in tax expense.New and Revised Financial Accounting StandardsThe JOBS Act permits emerging growth companies such as us to delay adopting new or revised accounting standards until such time as thosestandards apply to private companies. We have irrevocably elected not to avail ourselves of this and, therefore, we are subject to the same new or revisedaccounting standards as other public companies that are not emerging growth companies.Recently Issued and Adopted Accounting PronouncementsIn May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, Revenue fromContracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASU 2014-09”), which provides a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arisingfrom contracts with customers and will supersede most current revenue recognition guidance. In 2016, the FASB issued four amendments to ASU 2014-09.The standard is effective for public companies for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted as of one yearprior to the current effective date. The guidance permits two implementation approaches, one requiring retrospective application of the new standard withrestatement of prior years and one requiring prospective application of the new standard with disclosure of results under old standards. The Company has notselected an implementation approach. The Company elected not to adopt the standard early and is currently evaluating the impact of the pending adoptionof this ASU on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements - Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure ofUncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern.” ASU 2014-15 is intended to define management’s responsibility to evaluatewhether there is substantial doubt about an organization’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. Theamendments in this ASU are effective for reporting periods ending after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted ASU2014-15 for the year ended December 31, 2016 and updated the going concern disclosure accordingly.58Table of ContentsIn July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, "Inventory (Topic 330), Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory," which changes the measurementprinciple for inventory from the lower of cost or market to lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is defined as the estimated selling pricesin the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation. ASU 2015-11 eliminates the guidance thatentities consider replacement cost or net realizable value less an approximately normal profit margin in the subsequent measurement of inventory when costis determined on a first-in, first-out or average cost basis. The provisions of ASU 2015-11 are effective for public entities with fiscal years beginning afterDecember 15, 2016, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of this guidance by the Company is not expected to have a material impacton the Company's consolidated financial statements.In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17," Income Taxes (Topic 740) Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes," which will requirethat the presentation of deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent in a classified statement of financial position. The amendments in thisupdate are effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods.The adoption of this guidance by the Company is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). Under the new guidance, a lessee will be required to recognize assets andliabilities for all leases with lease terms of more than 12 months. Consistent with current generally accepted accounting principles, the recognition,measurement, and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee primarily will depend on its classification as a finance or operatinglease. This ASU requires additional disclosures. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods withinthose fiscal years. The ASU requires adoption based upon a modified retrospective transition approach. Early adoption is permitted. The Company has notyet determined whether it will elect early adoption and is currently evaluating the impact of the pending adoption of this ASU on the Company'sconsolidated financial statements and related disclosures.In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718). The new guidance simplifies several aspects ofthe accounting for share-based payment transactions, including forfeitures which can take effect when they occur, the income tax consequences,classification of awards, as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. The standard also requires that shares withheld tosatisfy tax withholding obligations associated with the vesting of restricted stock awarded to employees to be presented as a financing activity in thestatement of cash flows. The amendments in this standard are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods withinthose annual periods. Early adoption is permitted. The Company adopted this ASU effective January 1, 2017 and have elected to change our accountingpolicy regarding forfeitures. Previously, we estimated forfeitures expected to occur in the determination of compensation costs. Going forward we willrecognize forfeitures in the period they occur. The Company does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financialstatements.In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments.” The standard addresses severalmatters of diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows including thepresentation of debt extinguishment costs and distributions received from equity method investments. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginningafter December 15, 2017, including interim periods and allows for retrospective adoption with early adoption permitted. The Company has not yetdetermined whether it will elect early adoption and is currently evaluating the impact of the pending adoption of this ASU on its consolidated financialstatements and related disclosures.On November 17, 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (a consensus of the FASB EmergingIssues Task Force).” This ASU requires the statement of cash flows to explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amountsgenerally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Therefore, amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalentsare to be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning of period and end of period amounts shown on the statement of cashflows. ASU No. 2016-18 will be effective for us as of January 1, 2018. The Company is currently reviewing the effect of this ASU to the Company's financialstatements.59Table of ContentsLiquidity and Capital Resources Sources of Liquidity and OutlookSince inception, we have funded our operations primarily through the sale of certain of our equity securities and convertible notes to investors inprivate placements, the sale of our ordinary shares in public offerings and the incurrence of bank debt.As of December 31, 2016, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $23.7 million. The Company has an accumulated deficit in the totalamount of $106.5 million as of December 31, 2016 and further losses are anticipated in the development of its business. Those factors raise substantial doubtabout the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company obtaining thenecessary financing to meet its obligations and repay its liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due.The Company intends to finance operating costs over the next twelve months with existing cash on hand, reducing operating spend, issuancesunder the Company's ATM Offering Program, or other future issuances of equity and debt securities, or through a combination of the foregoing.The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern, whichcontemplates the realization of assets and liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. The consolidated financial statements for the yearended December 31, 2016 do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or theamounts and classification of liabilities that may result from uncertainty related to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.Our anticipated primary uses of cash are (i) sales, marketing and reimbursement expenses related to market development activities and broadeningthird-party payor coverage, and (ii) research and development costs related to our lightweight “soft suit” exoskeleton device that will assist patients who hadstroke, and developing our next generation of ReWalk with design improvements. Our future cash requirements will depend on many factors, including ourrate of revenue growth, the expansion of our sales and marketing activities, the timing and extent of our spending on research and development efforts andinternational expansion. If our current estimates of revenue, expenses or capital or liquidity requirements change or are inaccurate, we may seek to selladditional equity or debt securities, arrange for additional bank debt financing or refinance our indebtedness. There can be no assurance that we will be ableto raise such funds on acceptable terms. For more information, see “Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors-We have concluded that there are substantial doubts as to ourability to continue as a going concern."Loan Agreement with Kreos and Related Warrant to Purchase Ordinary SharesOn December 30, 2015, we entered into the Loan Agreement with Kreos pursuant to which Kreos extended a line of credit to us in the amount of$20.0 million. On January 4, 2016, we drew down $12.0 million under the Loan Agreement. Under the terms of the Loan Agreement we were entitled to drawdown up to an additional $8.0 million until December 31, 2016, if we raised $10.0 million or more in the issuance of shares of our capital stock (includingdebt convertible into shares of our capital stock) by December 31, 2016. On December 28, 2016, we drew down the remaining $8.0 million available underthe Loan Agreement. Interest is payable monthly in arrears on any amounts drawn down at a rate of 10.75% per year from the applicable drawdown datethrough the date on which all principal is repaid. The principal of each the $12.0 million and $8.0 million tranches is repayable monthly over a period of 24months commencing 12 months after the applicable drawdown date, which respective period will be extended to 36 months if we raise $20.0 million or morein connection with the issuance of shares of our capital stock (including debt convertible into shares of our capital stock) prior to the expiration of therespective 24-month period. Pursuant to the Loan Agreement, we paid Kreos a transaction fee equal to 1.0% of the total available amount of the line of creditupon the execution of the agreement and we will be required to pay Kreos an end of loan payment equal to 1.0% of the amount of each tranche drawn downupon the expiration of each such tranche. Total fees paid during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, in connection with the Loan Agreement amountedto $501 thousand. Pursuant to the Loan Agreement, we granted Kreos a first priority security interest over all of our assets, including intellectual property andequity interests in its subsidiaries, subject to certain permitted security interests.60Table of ContentsIn connection with the $12.0 million drawdown under the Loan Agreement, we issued to Kreos the warrant to purchase up to 119,295 of our ordinaryshares at an exercise price of $9.64 per share, which represented the average of the closing prices of our ordinary shares for the 30-day calendar period prior tothe date of the issuance of the warrant, subject to adjustment as set forth in the warrant. In connection with the $8.0 million drawdown under the LoanAgreement on December 28, 2016, we increased the amount of the warrant from $1.15 million to $1.61 million, or by $460,000. In its new amount, thewarrant represents the right to purchase up to 167,012 of our ordinary shares. The increase was based on the terms of the warrant, which provide that theamount of the warrant will be increased by 5.75% of any additional drawdowns. Subject to the terms of the warrant, the warrant is exercisable, in whole or inpart, during the term commencing on the original issuance date of December 30, 2015, through the earlier of (i) December 30, 2025, or (ii) immediately priorto the consummation of a merger, consolidation, or reorganization of us with or into, or the sale or license of all or substantially all our assets or shares to, anyother entity or person, other than a wholly-owned subsidiary of us, excluding any transaction in which our shareholders prior to the transaction will holdmore than 50% of the voting and economic rights of the surviving entity after the transaction.Equity RaisesOur initial public offering in September 2014 generated $36.3 million in net proceeds. Additionally, on May 10, 2016, we entered into our EquityDistribution Agreement with Piper Jaffray, pursuant to which we may offer and sell, from time to time, ordinary shares having an aggregate offering price ofup to $25.0 million through Piper Jaffray acting as our agent. Subject to the terms and conditions of the Equity Distribution Agreement, Piper Jaffray willuse its commercially reasonable efforts to sell on our behalf all of the ordinary shares requested to be sold by us, consistent with its normal trading and salespractices. Piper Jaffray may also act as principal in the sale of ordinary shares under the Equity Distribution Agreement. Such sales may be made under ourForm S-3 in what may be deemed “at-the-market” equity offerings as defined in Rule 415 promulgated under the Securities Act, directly on or through theNasdaq Global Market, to or through a market maker other than on an exchange or otherwise, in negotiated transactions at market prices prevailing at thetime of sale or at prices related to such prevailing market prices, and/or any other method permitted by law, including in privately negotiated transactions.Piper Jaffray is entitled to compensation at a fixed commission rate of 3.0% of the gross sales price per share sold through it as agent under the EquityDistribution Agreement. Where Piper Jaffray acts as principal in the sale of ordinary shares under the Equity Distribution Agreement, such rate ofcompensation will not apply, but in no event will the total compensation of Piper Jaffray, when combined with the reimbursement of Piper Jaffray for theout-of-pocket fees and disbursements of its legal counsel, exceed 8.0% of the gross proceeds received from the sale of the ordinary shares.We may instruct Piper Jaffray not to sell ordinary shares if the sales cannot be effected at or above the price designated by us in any instruction. Weor Piper Jaffray may suspend an offering of ordinary shares under the ATM Offering Program upon proper notice and subject to other conditions, as furtherdescribed in the Equity Distribution Agreement. Additionally, the ATM Offering Program will terminate on the earlier of (i) the sale of all ordinary sharessubject to the Equity Distribution Agreement or (ii) the termination of the Equity Distribution Agreement. The Equity Distribution Agreement may beterminated by Piper Jaffray or us at any time on the close of business on the date of receipt of written notice, and by Piper Jaffray at any time in certaincircumstances, including any suspension or limitation on the trading of our ordinary shares on the Nasdaq Global Market, as further described in the EquityDistribution Agreement. As of December 31, 2016, we had sold 692,062 ordinary shares under the ATM Offering Program for net proceeds to us of $4.1million (after commissions, fees and expenses). Additionally, as of that date, we had paid Piper Jaffray compensation of $137 thousand and had incurred totalexpenses of approximately $468 thousand in connection with the ATM Offering Program. Pursuant to our Underwriting Agreement with Oppenheimer inconnection with our follow-on offering, which closed on November 1, 2016 and is described below, we could not issue or sell ordinary shares under the ATMOffering Program until January 25, 2017. As this lock-up period has now expired, we intend to continue using the ATM Offering Program opportunisticallyto raise additional funds.On November 1, 2016, we closed our follow-on public offering of 3,250,000 units, each consisting of one ordinary share and 0.75 of a warrant topurchase one ordinary share. The units were not issued or certificated, and the ordinary shares and warrants underlying the units were immediately separableand issued separately. The warrants are not listed on the Nasdaq Global Market, any other national securities exchange or any other nationally recognizedtrading system. The ordinary shares and the warrants underlying the units and the ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants are registered underthe Securities Act on our Form S-3. Our estimated net aggregate proceeds, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated expenses,were $11.1 million. We also granted Oppenheimer, as underwriter under the Underwriting Agreement, an option to purchase up to 487,500 additional units atthe public offering price, less the underwriting discount, for 30 days after October 27, 2016, which Oppenheimer did not exercise. All estimates of netaggregate proceeds assume that none of the warrants issued in the offering will be exercised.61Table of ContentsThe warrants became exercisable during the period commencing from the date of original issuance and ending on November 1, 2021, the expirationdate of the warrants, at an initial exercise price of $4.75 per ordinary share. The exercise price and the number of ordinary shares into which the warrants maybe exercised are subject to adjustment upon certain corporate events, including stock splits, reverse stock splits, combinations, stock dividends,recapitalizations, reorganizations and certain other events. Our board of directors may also determine to make such adjustments to the exercise price andnumber of ordinary shares to be issued upon exercise based on similar events, including the granting of stock appreciation rights, phantom stock rights orother rights with equity features. At any time, the board of directors may reduce the exercise price of the warrants to any amount and for any period of time itdeems appropriate.Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 Years Ended December 31, 2016 2015 2014Net cash used in operating activities$(27,537) $(25,180) $(15,319)Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities(437) 1,083 (1,836)Net cash provided by financing activities33,783 137 50,124Net cash flow$5,809 $(23,960) $32,969Net Cash Used in Operating ActivitiesNet cash used in operating activities increased from $25.2 million in 2015 to $27.5 million in 2016, primarily as a result of higher operatingexpenses mainly due to the research and development expenses related to the Collaboration Agreement and the License Agreement with Harvard. Net cashused in operating activities increased from $15.3 million in 2014 to $25.2 million in 2015 primarily as a result of higher operating expenses and changes inworking capital.Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing ActivitiesNet cash provided by (used in) investing activities decreased from $1.1 million in 2015 to $(437) thousand in 2016, primarily as a result of thematurity of short- term deposits in 2015 offset by a decrease in cash used in purchasing of property and equipment. Net cash provided by (used in) investingactivities increased from $(1.8) million in 2014 to $1.1 million in 2015 primarily as a result of cash provided by disposing of a net investment in short-termdeposits partially offset by cash used for the purchases of property and equipment.Net Cash Provided by Financing ActivitiesWe generated $33.8 million from financing activities in 2016, which reflects $20 million from the Loan Agreement entered into with Kreos, $11.1million net proceeds from the issuance of ordinary shares in the follow-on offering and $4.1 million net proceeds from the issuance of ordinary shares in theATM, which was offset by $1.4 million in capital repayments and debt issuance costs related to the Loan Agreement with Kreos. We generated $137thousand from financing activities in 2015, due to the exercise of stock options by our employees and non-employees. We generated $50.1 million in cashfrom financing activities in 2014, which reflects $36.3 million of net proceeds from our initial public offering, and $12.8 million received in an investment inour preferred shares and warrants in our series E investment round and $1.1 million received upon exercise of our warrants.Obligations and Commercial CommitmentsSet forth below is a summary of our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2016.62Table of Contents Payments due by period (in dollars, in thousands)Contractual obligationsTotal Less than 1 year1-3 years 3-5years More than 5years Purchase obligations (1)$2,190 $2,190 $— $— $—Collaboration Agreement and License Agreementobligations (2)5,721 1,958 2,250 1,513 —Operating lease obligations (3)4,440 548 1,106 1,133 1,653Long-term debt obligations (4)22,256 7,495 14,761 — —Total$34,607 $12,191 $18,117 $2,646 $1,653(1) The Company depends on one contract manufacturer, Sanmina. We place our manufacturing orders with Sanmina pursuant to purchase orders or byproviding forecasts for future requirements. Sanmina accounted for 12% and 24% of the Company's total trade payables as of December 31, 2016 andDecember 31, 2015 respectively.(2) Our Research Collaboration Agreement is for a period of five years and requires us to pay in quarterly installments for the funding of our joint researchcollaboration with Harvard, subject to a minimum funding commitment under applicable circumstances. Our License Agreement consists of patentreimbursement expenses payments and of a license upfront fee payment. There are also several milestone payments contingent upon the achievement ofcertain product development and commercialization milestones and royalty payments on net sales from certain patents licensed to Harvard. These productdevelopment and commercialization milestones depend on us obtaining favorable clinical developments, sales and regulatory actions, some or all of whichmay not occur. Since the achievement and timing of these milestones is neither determinable nor reasonably estimable, these milestone payments are notincluded in this “Contractual Obligations” table or recorded on our consolidated condensed balance sheet as of December 31, 2016. Moreover, since suchroyalties are dependent on future product sales which are neither determinable nor reasonably estimable, these royalty payments are not included in this“Contractual Obligations” table or recorded on our consolidated condensed balance sheet as of December 31, 2016.(3) Our operating leases consist of leases for our facilities and motor vehicles.(4) Our long-term debt obligations consist of payments of principal and interest under our Loan Agreement with Kreos.We calculated the payments due under our operating lease obligation for our Israeli office that are to be paid in NIS at a rate of exchange of NIS 3.84:$1.00,and the payments due under our operating lease obligation for our German subsidiary that are to be paid in euros at a rate of exchange of €1.00 :$1.05, bothof which were the applicable exchange rates as of December 31, 2016. We calculated the payments due under our Loan Agreement with Kreos according tothe current schedule of repayment of principal and interest, taking into account the two tranches of debt drawn down under the Loan Agreement. Forinformation on this repayment schedule, see “-Liquidity and Capital Resources-Loan Agreement with Kreos and Related Warrant to Purchase OrdinaryShares” above.Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements We had no off-balance sheet arrangements or guarantees of third-party obligations during the periods presented. Trend InformationFor information on significant known trends, please see “Part I,Item 1. “Business - Overview” in this annual report.ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISKCurrency Exchange RiskOur results of operations and cash flows are affected by fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. In 2016, 2015 and 2014 most of ourrevenues were denominated in U.S. dollars and the remainder of our revenues was denominated in euros and British pounds, and most of our expenses werealso denominated in U.S. dollars, and the remainder of our expenses were denominated in NIS and euros. Accordingly, changes in the value of the NIS andeuro relative to the U.S. dollar in each of the years 2014, 2015 and 2016 impacted amounts recorded on our consolidated statements of operations for thoseperiods. We expect that the denominations of our revenue and expenses in 2017 will be consistent with what we experienced in 2016.63The following table presents information about the changes in the exchange rates of the NIS and euro against the U.S. dollar in 2014, 2015 and2016: Change in Average Exchange RatePeriod NIS against the U.S. Dollar (%) Euro against the U.S. Dollar (%)2014 (0.89) (0.01)2015 8.24 16.442016 (1.32) (0.33)The figures above represent the change in the average exchange rate in the given period compared to the average exchange rate in the immediatelypreceding period. Negative figures represent depreciation of the U.S. dollar compared to the NIS or the euro. A 10% increase or decrease in the value of theNIS against the U.S. dollar would have decreased or increased our net loss by approximately $896 thousand in 2016. A 10% increase or decrease in the valueof the euro against the U.S. dollar would have decreased or increased our net loss by approximately $322 thousand in 2016.From time to time, we enter into limited short term hedging arrangements with financial institutions. We do not use derivative financial instrumentsfor speculative or trading purposes.Other Market RisksWe do not believe that we have material exposure to interest rate risks or to inflationary risks.ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATAThe information required hereunder is set forth under Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, Consolidated Balance Sheets,Consolidated Statements of Operations, Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity, Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and Notes to ConsolidatedFinancial Statements included in the Consolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this annual report. Other financial information is included in theConsolidated Financial Statements that are a part of this annual report..ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE None.ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES Disclosure Controls and ProceduresWe maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed inour Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rulesand forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief FinancialOfficer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required financial disclosure.As of the end of the period covered by this Report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of ourmanagement, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controlsand procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act). Based upon, and as of the date of, this evaluation, the ChiefExecutive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective such that the information required tobe disclosed by us in our SEC reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and isaccumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timelydecisions regarding required disclosure. 64Table of ContentsManagement’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f)and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding thereliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. GAAP.Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:•pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;•provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance withU.S. GAAP, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors;and•provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets thatcould have a material effect on our financial statements.Management has assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016. In making its assessment,management used the criteria described in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of theTreadway Commission.Based on management’s assessment, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31,2016 to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of consolidated financial statements for externalreporting purposes in accordance with U.S. GAAP.This annual report does not include an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal controls over financialreporting because the JOBS Act provides an exemption from such requirement as we qualify as an emerging growth company.Changes in Internal Control over Financial ReportingDuring the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (asdefined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) that materially affected, or that are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controlover financial reporting. ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATIONNot applicable. 65Table of ContentsPART IIIITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIdentification of Executive OfficersThe following table sets forth the name, age and position of each of our executive officers as of February 1, 2017:Name Age Position Larry Jasinski 59 Chief Executive Officer and DirectorKevin Hershberger 52 Chief Financial OfficerOfir Koren 47 Vice President, Research & Development and RegulatoryJodi Gricci 49 Vice President, Global Marketing, Service and Training_____________________________________________________Larry Jasinski has served as our Chief Executive Officer and as a member of our board since February 2012. From 2005 until 2012, Mr. Jasinskiserved as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Soteira, Inc., a company engaged in development and commercialization of products used to treatindividuals with vertebral compression fractures, which was acquired by Globus Medical in 2012. From 2001 to 2005, Mr. Jasinski was President and ChiefExecutive Officer of Cortek, Inc., a company that developed next-generation treatments for degenerative disc disease, which was acquired by Alphatec in2005. From 1985 until 2001, Mr. Jasinski served in multiple sales, research and development, and general management roles at Boston ScientificCorporation. Mr. Jasinski has served on the board of directors of Massachusetts Bay Lines since 2015 and of LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. since 2003. Mr. Jasinskiholds a B.Sc. in marketing from Providence College and an MBA from the University of Bridgeport.Kevin Hershberger has served as our Chief Financial Officer since January 2015. From 2008 to 2014, Mr. Hershberger served as Vice President,Controller and Chief Accounting Officer at NxStage Medical Inc., a manufacturer of dialysis products. Prior to NxStage Mr. Hershberger served in multiplefinance and management roles with Boston Scientific and USG Corporation. Mr. Hershberger holds a B.S. in accounting from West Virginia University.Ofir Koren has served as our Vice President, Research & Development and Regulatory since February 2017,and was previously our Vice PresidentResearch and Development since he joined us in February 2013. From 2009 to 2013, Mr. Koren served as General Manager of RuggedCOM Israel, adeveloper of communications equipment. From 2007 to 2009, he served as the Vice President of Research and Development of Alvarion Technologies Ltd.,an Israeli provider of wireless services. Mr. Koren holds a B.Sc. in electrical engineering from Tel Aviv University and an MBA from the University of HerriotWatt, Scotland.Jodi Gricci has served as our Vice President, Global Marketing Service and Training since February 2017, and was previously our Vice President,Global Marketing and Training since she joined us in June 2012. Prior to joining us, Ms. Gricci was the Managing Director of Soteira GmbH, a medicaldevice company based in Berlin, Germany, from November 2008 to June 2012.As reported on our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 30, 2017, John Hamilton, who had served as our Vice President,Regulatory and Clinical since joining us in June 2012, left his officer post effective January 31, 2017 to pursue an opportunity serving as our externalconsultant. The remaining information required by this Item will be included in, and is incorporated herein by reference from, our definitive proxy statement forour 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the end of our 2016 fiscal year endedDecember 31, 2016 (the “Proxy Statement”).ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION The information required by this Item 11 will be included in, and is incorporated herein by reference from, our Proxy Statement.66Table of ContentsITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERSThe information required by this Item will 12 be included in and is incorporated herein by reference from, our Proxy Statement.ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCEThe information required by this Item 13 will be included in and is incorporated herein by reference, from our Proxy Statement.ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES The information required by this Item 14 will be included in and is incorporated herein by reference, from our Proxy Statement.PART IVITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES(a)(1) Financial Statements.The Consolidated Financial Statements filed as part of this annual report are identified in the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements on page F-1 hereto.(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules. Financial Statement Schedules have been omitted because the information required to be set forth therein is not applicable or is shown in thefinancial statements or notes thereto. (a)(3) Exhibits. See accompanying Exhibit Index included after the signature page of this report for a list of the exhibits filed or furnished with or incorporated byreference in this report.67Table of ContentsITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARYNot applicable.SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed onits behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. ReWalk Robotics Ltd. By:/s/ Larry Jasinski Name: Larry Jasinski Title: Chief Executive OfficerDate: February 17, 2017POWER OF ATTORNEYKNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENT: That the undersigned officers and directors of ReWalk Robotics Ltd. do hereby constitute andappoint Larry Jasinski and Kevin Hershberger the lawful attorney and agent with power and authority to do any and all acts and things and to execute anyand all instruments which said attorney and agent determines may be necessary or advisable or required to enable ReWalk Robotics Ltd. to comply with theSecurities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and any rules or regulations or requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission in connectionwith this report. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing power and authority, the powers granted include the power and authority to sign the namesof the undersigned officers and directors in the capacities indicated below to this report or amendments or supplements thereto, and each of the undersignedhereby ratifies and confirms all that said attorneys and agents, or either of them, shall do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. This Power of Attorney may besigned in several counterparts.68Table of ContentsPursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the registrantand in the capacities and on the dates indicated. Signature Title Date /s/ Larry Jasinski Director and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer) February 17, 2017Larry Jasinski /s/ Kevin Hershberger Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer and Principal AccountingOfficer) February 17, 2017Kevin Hershberger /s/ Jeff Dykan Chairman of the Board February 17, 2017Jeff Dykan /s/ Dr. John William Poduska Director February 17, 2017Dr. John William Poduska /s/ Deborah DiSanzo Director February 17, 2017Deborah DiSanzo /s/ Wayne B. Weisman Director February 17, 2017Wayne B. Weisman /s/ Yasushi Ichiki Director February 17 2017Yasushi Ichiki /s/ Aryeh Dan Director February 17, 2017Aryeh Dan /s/ Glenn Muir Director February 17, 2017Glenn Muir /s/ Peter Wehrly Director February 17, 2017Peter Wehrly 69Table of ContentsEXHIBIT INDEXNumber Description3.1 Second Amended and Restated Articles of Association of the Company, as amended by the First Amendment thereto (incorporated byreference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 29, 2016, as amended on May 6,2016).4.1 Specimen share certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's registration statement on Form F-1/A (File No. 333-197344), filed with the SEC on August 20, 2014).4.2 Amended and Restated Shareholders’ Rights Agreement, dated July 14, 2014, among the Company and the other parties named therein(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Company's registration statement on Form F-1/A (File No. 333-197344), filed with the SECon July 16, 2014).4.3 Fourth Amended and Restated Shareholders Agreement, dated July 14, 2014, among the Company and the shareholders party thereto(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Company's registration statement on Form F-1/A (File No. 333-197344), filed with the SECon July 16, 2014).4.4 Form of warrant issued in connection with the Company's follow-on offering (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’sCurrent Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 31, 2016).10.1 Letter of Agreement, dated July 11, 2013, between the Company and Sanmina Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to theCompany's registration statement on Form F-1 (File No. 333-197344), filed with the SEC on July 10, 2014).*10.2 Strategic Alliance Agreement, dated September 24, 2013, between the Company and Yaskawa Electric Corporation (incorporated by referenceto Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's registration statement on Form F-1 (File No. 333-197344), filed with the SEC on July 10, 2014).10.3 Exclusive Distribution Agreement, dated September 24, 2013, between the Company and Yaskawa Electric Corporation (incorporated byreference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's registration statement on Form F-1 (File No. 333-197344), filed with the SEC on July 10, 2014).*10.4 Confidentiality and Non-Disclosure Agreement, dated September 24, 2013, between the Company and Yaskawa Electric Corporation(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company's registration statement on Form F-1 (File No. 333-197344), filed with the SEC onJuly 10, 2014).10.5 Side Letter, dated September 30, 2013, between the Company and Yaskawa Electric Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 tothe Company's registration statement on Form F-1 (File No. 333-197344), filed with the SEC on July 10, 2014).10.6 Loan Agreement, dated December 30, 2015, between the Company and Kreos Capital V (Expert Fund) Limited (incorporated by reference toExhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 4, 2016).10.7 Warrant, dated December 30, 2015, between the Company and Kreos Capital V (Expert Fund) Limited (incorporated by reference to Exhibit10.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 4, 2016).10.8 Research Collaboration Agreement, dated May 16, 2016, between the Company and the President and Fellows of Harvard College(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 17, 2016).*10.9 License Agreement, dated May 16, 2016, between the Company and the President and Fellows of Harvard College (incorporated by referenceto Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 17, 2016).*10.10 Form of indemnification agreement between the Company and each of its directors and executive officers (incorporated by reference toExhibit 10.11 to the Company's registration statement on Form F-1/A (File No. 333-197344), filed with the SEC on August 20, 2014).**10.11 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Company's registration statement on Form F-1 (File No. 333-197344), filed with the SEC on July 10, 2014). **10.12 2012 Israeli Equity Incentive Sub Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Company's registration statement on Form F-1 (FileNo. 333-197344), filed with the SEC on July 10, 2014). **10.13 2012 U.S. Equity Incentive Sub Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Company's registration statement on Form F-1 (FileNo. 333-197344), filed with the SEC on July 10, 2014). **10.14 2006 Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Company's registration statement on Form F-1 (File No. 333-197344), filed with the SEC on July 10, 2014). **10.15 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Company's registration statement on Form F-1/A (File No. 333-197344), filed with the SEC on August 20, 2014). **10.16 Employment Agreement, dated as of December 17, 2014, between the Company and Kevin Hershberger (incorporated by reference to Exhibit10.15 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 29, 2016, as amended on May 6, 2016).**70Table of Contents10.17 Executive Employment Agreement, dated as of January 17, 2011, between the Company and Larry Jasinski (incorporated by reference toExhibit 10.16 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 29, 2016, as amended on May 6, 2016).**10.18 2014 Incentive Compensation Plan Form of Option Award Agreement for employees and executives (incorporated by reference to Exhibit10.18 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 29, 2016, as amended on May 6, 2016).**10.19 2014 Incentive Compensation Plan Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for employees and executives (incorporated by referenceto Exhibit 10.19 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 29, 2016, as amended on May 6, 2016).**10.20 2014 Incentive Compensation Plan Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for non-Israeli non-employee directors (incorporated byreference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 29, 2016, as amended on May 6,2016).**10.21 2014 Incentive Compensation Plan Form of Option Award Agreement for Israeli non-employee directors.**10.22 2014 Incentive Compensation Plan Form of Option Award Agreement for non-Israeli non-employee directors.**10.23 ReWalk Robotics Ltd. Compensation Policy for Executive Officers and Non-Executive Directors, as amended (incorporated by reference toExhibit 10.1 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 27, 2016). **10.24 Equity Distribution Agreement, dated May 10, 2016, between the Company and Piper Jaffray & Co., as Agent(incorporated by reference toExhibit 1.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 10, 2016).10.25 Underwriting Agreement, dated October 27, 2016, between the Company and Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit1.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 31, 2016).10.26 Series E Preferred Securities Purchase Agreement, dated June 26, 2014, among the Company and the parties named therein (incorporated byreference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Company's registration statement on Form F-1/A (File No. 333-197344), filed with the SEC on July 16, 2014).10.27 Employment Agreement, dated as of June 18, 2012, between the Company and John Hamilton (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 ofthe Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 29, 2016, as amended on May 6, 2016).**21.1 List of subsidiaries of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 21.1 to the Company's registration statement on Form F-1 (File No.333-197344), filed with the SEC on July 10, 2014).23.1 Consent of Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer.31.1 Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002.31.2 Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002.32.1 Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002.***32.2 Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002.***101.INS XBRL Instance Document101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document__________________________*Portions of the agreement were omitted and a complete copy of the agreement has been provided separately to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuantto the Company’s application requesting confidential treatment under, as applicable, Rule 406 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended and/or Rule 24b-2 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. **Management contract or compensatory plan, contract or arrangement. ***Furnished herewith.71Table of ContentsREWALK ROBOTICS LTDCONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS U.S. DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS INDEX PageReport of Registered Public Accounting FirmF-2Consolidated Balance SheetsF-3Consolidated Statements of OperationsF-5Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ EquityF-6Consolidated Statements of Cash FlowsF-7Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsF-9F-1Table of ContentsKost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer2 Pal-Yam Blvd.Haifa 3309502, IsraelTel: +972-4-8654000Fax: +972-3-5633439ey.comREPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMTo the Board of Directors and Shareholders ofREWALK ROBOTICS LTD.We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of ReWalk Robotics Ltd. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31,2016, and 2015, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders’ equity (deficiency) and cash flows for each of the threeyears in the period ended December 31, 2016. These financial statements are the responsibility of Company’s management. Our responsibility is to expressan opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standardsrequire that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We werenot engaged to perform an audit of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control overfinancial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion onthe effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, ona test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimatesmade by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Companyand its subsidiaries at December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in theperiod ended December 31, 2016, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As describedin Note 1h to the consolidated financial statements, for the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company incurred a net loss totaling $106.5 million andfurther losses are anticipated in the development of its business. These factors, along with other factors described in Note 1h, raise substantial doubt aboutthe Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans with respect to these matters are also described in Note 1h. The consolidatedfinancial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts andclassification of liabilities that may result from the outcome of this uncertainty.Haifa, Israel/s/ KOST FORER GABBAY & KASIERERFebruary 17, 2017KOST FORER GABBAY & KASIERER A Member of Ernst & Young GlobalF-2Table of ContentsREWALK ROBOTICS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIESCONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETSU.S. dollars in thousands December 31, 2016 2015ASSETS CURRENT ASSETS: Cash and cash equivalents$23,678 $17,869Trade receivable, net1,254 2,146Prepaid expenses and other current assets1,291 1,227Inventories3,264 2,534 Total current assets29,487 23,776 LONG-TERM ASSETS Other long term assets1,018 470Property and equipment, net1,258 1,328 Total long-term assets2,276 1,798 Total assets$31,763 $25,574 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.F-3Table of ContentsREWALK ROBOTICS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIESCONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETSU.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share data) December 31, 2016 2015LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY CURRENT LIABILITIES: Current maturities of long term loan$7,495 $—Trade payables3,424 2,474Employees and payroll accruals1,019 1,221Deferred revenues and customers advances54 199Other current liabilities406 449 Total current liabilities12,398 4,343 LONG-TERM LIABILITIES Long term loan, net of current maturities10,518 —Deferred revenues284 171Other long-term liabilities303 140 Total long-term liabilities11,105 311 Total liabilities23,503 4,654 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES Shareholders’ equity: Share capital Ordinary share of NIS 0.01 par value-Authorized: 250,000,000 shares at December 31, 2016 and 2015;Issued and outstanding: 16,338,257 and 12,222,583 shares at December 31, 2016 and 2015,respectively45 33Additional paid-in capital114,707 94,876Accumulated deficit(106,492) (73,989) Total shareholders’ equity8,260 20,920 Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity$31,763 $25,574 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.F-4Table of ContentsREWALK ROBOTICS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIESCONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONSU.S. dollars in thousands (except share and per share data) Year endedDecember 31 2016 2015 2014Revenues$5,869 $3,746 $3,951Cost of revenues5,133 3,532 4,106Expense related to settlement of BIRD Foundation grants (see Note 7c)— — 466 Gross profit (loss)736 214 (621) Operating expenses: Research and development, net9,028 5,937 8,563Sales and marketing13,961 13,056 7,389General and administration8,188 6,395 3,352 Total operating expenses31,177 25,388 19,304 Operating loss(30,441) (25,174) (19,925)Financial expenses, net2,059 188 1,698 Loss before income taxes(32,500) (25,362) (21,623)Income taxes3 53 45 Net loss$(32,503) $(25,415) $(21,668) Net loss per ordinary share, basic and diluted$(2.47) $(2.10) $(6.34) Weighted average number of shares used in computing net loss per ordinary share, basicand diluted13,178,107 12,115,038 3,766,694 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.F-5Table of ContentsREWALK ROBOTICS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIESSTATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITYU.S. dollars in thousands (except share data) ConvertiblePreferred Shares (2) OrdinaryShare (1)(2) Additionalpaid-incapital Accumulateddeficit Totalshareholders’equity Number Amount Number Amount Balance as of December 31, 2013327,403 *) 185,688 *) 32,537 (26,906) 5,631Exercise of warrants into Series C Convertible preferredShares17,705 *) — — 3,825 — 3,825Exercise of warrants into Series D Convertible preferredShares263 *) — — 57 — 57Issuance of Series D convertible preferred shares4,131 *) — — 1,114 — 1,114Issuance of Series E convertible preferred shares, net ofissuance expense in an amount of $21275,695 *) — — 7,895 — 7,895Conversion of convertible preferred shares into ordinaryshares(425,197) *) 7,838,640 22 (22) — —Balance as of Reclassification of liability warrants to equity warrants— — — — 5,555 — 5,555Issuance of ordinary shares in IPO, netof issuance expenses in an amount of $5,138— — 3,450,000 9 36,254 — 36,263Exercise of warrants into ordinary shares— — 157,618 — — — —Share-based compensation to employees and nonemployees— — — — 5,179 — 5,179Issuance of ordinary share upon exercise of stockoptions by employees— — 346,608 1 1 — 2Net loss— — — — — (21,668) (21,668)Balance as of December 31, 2014— — 11,978,554 32 92,395 (48,574) 43,853Share-based compensation to employees and nonemployees— — — — 2,345 — 2,345Issuance of ordinary share upon exercise of stockoptions and RSUs by employees and non employees— — 194,345 1 136 — 137Cashless exercise of warrants into ordinary shares— — 49,684 *) *) — —Net loss— — — — — (25,415) (25,415)Balance as of December 31, 2015— — 12,222,583 33 94,876 (73,989) 20,920Share-based compensation to employees and non-employees— — — — 3,398 — 3,398Issuance of ordinary shares upon exercise of options topurchase ordinary shares and RSUs by employees andnon-employees— — 128,496 1 17 — 18Issuance of ordinary shares in at-the-market offering, netof issuance expenses in the amount of $468 (3)— — 692,062 2 4,097 — 4,099Issuance of warrants to purchase ordinary shares (4)— — — — 1,239 — 1,239Cashless exercise of warrants into ordinary shares— — 45,116 *) *) — —Issuance of ordinary shares and warrants to purchaseordinary shares in follow-on public offering, net ofissuance expenses in an amount of $1,099 (3)— — 3,250,000 9 11,080 — 11,089Net loss— — — — — (32,503) (32,503)Balance as of December 31, 2016— — 16,338,257 45 114,707 (106,492) 8,260*)Represents an amount lower than $1. (1) The ordinary shares consist of two series, see note 8a.(2)All shares amount have been restated to reflect an 18-for-1 share split split as of August 26, 2014, see Note 8b.(3)See note 8c.(4)See note 6.The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.F-6Table of ContentsREWALK ROBOTICS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIESCONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWSU.S. dollars in thousands Year endedDecember 31 2016 2015 2014Cash flows from operating activities: Net loss$(32,503) $(25,415) $(21,668)Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: Depreciation696 438 111Share-based compensation to employees and non employees3,398 2,345 5,179Deferred taxes(5) (61) (60)Financial expenses related to convertible loans675 — —Capital Gain(8) — —Revaluation of fair value of warrants to purchase convertible preferred share— — (776)Issuance of Warrants to venture lending— — 835Issuance of Warrants to service provider— — 73Financial expenses resulted from Issuance of Series D preferred shares to related party— — 1,114 Changes in assets and liabilities: Trade receivables, net892 (191) (1,651)Prepaid expenses and other current assets(607) (613) (440)Inventories(911) (2,525) 196Trade payables950 1,084 445Employees and payroll accruals(202) 349 308Deferred revenues and advances from customers(32) 121 (72)Other liabilities120 (712) 1,105Severance pay, net— — (18)Net cash used in operating activities(27,537) (25,180) (15,319) Cash flows from investing activities: Investment in short-term deposits— — (10,000)Maturities of short-term deposits— 1,667 8,333Purchase of property and equipment(452) (584) (169)Proceeds from sale of property and equipment15 — —Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities(437) 1,083 (1,836)Cash flows from financing activities: Proceeds from long term loan20,000 — —Debt issuance cost(501) — —Repayment of long term loan(922) — —F-7Table of ContentsREWALK ROBOTICS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWSU.S. dollars in thousandsYear endedDecember 31 2016 2015 2014Issuance of ordinary shares in at-the-market offering, net of issuance expenses paid in theamount of $4684,099 — —Issuance of ordinary shares and warrants in follow-on offering, net of issuance expenses inan amount of $1,09911,089 — —Issuance of ordinary share upon exercise of stock options by employees and non employees18 137 2Issuance of Series E convertible preferred shares, including warrants, net— — 12,781Exercise of warrants into Series C and D to convertible preferred shares— — 1,078Issuance of ordinary shares in IPO, net of issuance expenses in an amount of $5,138— — 36,263Net cash provided by financing activities33,783 137 50,124 Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents5,809 (23,960) 32,969Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period17,869 41,829 8,860 Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$23,678 $17,869 $41,829 Supplemental disclosures of non-cash flow information Classification of inventory to property and equipment, net$181 $768 $— Exercise of warrants to purchase preferred shares into Series C and D preferred shares$— $— $2,804 Reclassification of liability warrants to equity warrants$— $— $5,555 Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: Cash paid for income taxes$45 $163 $—Cash paid for interest$1,301 $— $— The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.F-8REWALK ROBOTICS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIESNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOTE 1:- GENERAL a.ReWalk Robotics Ltd. (“RRL”, and together with its subsidiaries, the “Company”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Israel on June 20,2001 and commenced operations on the same date.b.RRL has two wholly-owned subsidiaries: (i) ReWalk Robotics Inc. (“RRI”) incorporated under the laws of Delaware on February 15, 2012 and(ii) ReWalk Robotics GMBH. (“RRG”) (formerly Argo Medical Technologies GmbH) incorporated under the laws of Germany on January 14, 2013.c.The Company is designing, developing and commercializing the ReWalk system, an innovative exoskeleton that allow wheelchair-bound personswith mobility impairments or other medical conditions to stand and walk once again. The ReWalk system consists of a light wearable brace supportsuit which integrates motors at the joints, rechargeable batteries, an array of sensors and a computer-based control system to power knee and hipmovement. There are currently two types of products: ReWalk Personal and ReWalk Rehabilitation. ReWalk Personal is designed for everyday useby individuals at home and in their communities, and is custom fitted for each user. ReWalk Rehabilitation is designed for the clinical rehabilitationenvironment where it provides valuable exercise and therapy. It also enables individuals to evaluate their capacity for using ReWalk Personalsystem in the future.d.The Company markets and sells its products directly to institutions and individuals and through third-party distributors. The Company sells itsproducts directly primarily in Germany and the United States, and primarily through distributors in other markets. In its direct markets, the Companyhas established relationships with rehabilitation centers and the spinal cord injury community, and in its indirect markets, the Company’sdistributors maintain these relationships. RRI markets and sells products mainly in the United States and Canada. RRG sell the Company’s productsmainly in Germany and Europe.e.During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, the Company issued and sold 692,062 ordinary shares at an average price of $6.60 per share underits ATM Offering Program. The gross proceeds to the Company were $4.6 million, and the net aggregate proceeds after deducting commissions, feesand offering expenses in the amount of $468 thousand were $4.1 million. The Company could raise up to $25 million under its ATM OfferingProgram. See Note 8c(1) below for more information about the Company’s ATM Offering Program.f.In November 2016, the Company completed its follow-on public offering in which the Company issued and sold 3,250,000 units each consisting ofone ordinary share and 0.75 of a warrant to purchase one ordinary share. Each unit was sold to the public at a price of $3.75 per unit. The total grossproceeds received from the follow-on public offering, before deducting commissions, discounts and expenses, were $12.2 million. See Note 8c(2)below for more information about the Company’s follow-on public offering.g.The Company depends on one contract manufacturer, Sanmina. Reliance on this vendor makes the Company vulnerable to possible capacityconstraints and reduced control over component availability, delivery schedules, manufacturing yields and costs. This vendor accounted for 12%and 24% of the Company's total trade payables as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.h.The Company has an accumulated deficit in the total amount of $106.5 million as of December 31, 2016 and further losses are anticipated in thedevelopment of its business. Those factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The ability tocontinue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company obtaining the necessary financing to meet its obligations and repay its liabilitiesarising from normal business operations when they become due. The Company intends to finance operating costs over the next twelve months with existing cash on hand, reducing operating spend, issuancesunder the Company's ATM Offering Program, or other future issuances of equity and debt securities, or through a combination of the foregoing. Seenote 13a for further information about the Company's plan to reduce operating expenses.The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern, whichcontemplates the realization of assets and liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business.The consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016 do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects onthe recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from uncertainty related to theCompany’s ability to continue as a going concern.F-9REWALK ROBOTICS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIESNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOTE 2:- SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIESThe consolidated financial statements are prepared according to United States generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”), applied on aconsistent basis, as follows: a.Use of EstimatesThe preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management tomake estimates, judgments and assumptions. The Company’s management believes that the estimates, judgments and assumptions used arereasonable based upon information available at the time they are made. These estimates, judgments and assumptions can affect the reported amountsof assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements, and the reported amounts ofrevenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. On an ongoing basis, the Company’smanagement evaluates estimates, including those related to inventories, fair values of share-based awards and warrants, contingent liabilities,provision for warranty, allowance for doubtful account and sales return reserve. Such estimates are based on historical experience and on variousother assumptions that are believed to be reasonable, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assetsand liabilities.b.Financial Statements in U.S. Dollars:Most of the revenues and costs of the Company are denominated in United States dollars (“dollars”). Some of the Company’s and its subsidiaries’revenues and costs are incurred in Euros and New Israeli Shekels (“NIS”), however, the selling prices are linked to the Company’s price list which isdetermined in dollars, the budget is managed in dollars, financing activities including loans and cash investments, are made in U.S. dollars and theCompany’s management believes that the dollar is the primary currency of the economic environment in which the Company and each of itssubsidiaries operate. Thus, the dollar is the Company’s and its subsidiaries’ functional and reporting currency. Accordingly, transactions denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are re-measured to the functional currency in accordancewith Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) No. 830, “Foreign Currency Matters” at the exchange rate at the date of the transaction or theaverage exchange rate in the relevant reporting period. At the end of each reporting period, financial assets and liabilities are re-measured to thefunctional currency using exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. Non-financial assets and liabilities are re-measured at historicalexchange rates. Gains and losses related to re-measurement are recorded as financial income (expense) in the consolidated statements of operationsas appropriate. c.Principles of Consolidation:The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, RRI and RRG. All intercompanytransactions and balances have been eliminated upon consolidation. d.Cash Equivalents: Cash equivalents are short-term highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to cash with original maturities of three months or less, at thedate acquired.e.Inventories:Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market value. Inventory reserves are provided to cover risks arising from slow-moving items ortechnological obsolescence.The Company periodically evaluates the quantities on hand relative to historical, current and projected sales volume. Based on this evaluation, animpairment charge is recorded when required to write-down inventory to its market value. Cost is determined as follows:Raw materials, auxiliary materials and spare parts - on the basis of raw materials cost on “first in, first out” basis.Finished products - on the basis of raw materials and manufacturing costs on an average basis.F-10REWALK ROBOTICS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIESNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The Company regularly evaluates the ability to realize the value of inventory based on a combination of factors, including historical usage rates andforecasted sales according to outstanding backlogs. Purchasing requirements and alternative usage are explored within these processes to mitigateinventory exposure. When recorded, the reserves are intended to reduce the carrying value of inventory to its net realizable value. In the years endedDecember 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, the Company wrote off inventory in the amount of $237 thousand, $127 thousand and $76 thousand,respectively. If actual demand for the Company’s products deteriorates, or market conditions are less favorable than those projected, additionalinventory reserves may be required. f.Related party: The Company has a substantial shareholder named Yaskawa Electric Corporation (“YEC”).In September 2013 the Company entered into a share purchase agreement and a strategic alliance with YEC, pursuant to which YEC has agreed todistribute the Company’s products, in addition to providing sales, marketing, service and training functions, in Japan, China (including Hong-Kongand Macau), Taiwan, South Korea, Singapore and Thailand.As of December 31, 2016 and 2015 related party receivable were 24.2% and 11.3%, of trade receivable, net, respectively. Revenues from YECduring the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 amounted to $295 thousand, $246 thousand and $394 thousand respectively.g.Property and Equipment: Property and equipment are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method over theestimated useful lives of the assets at the following annual rates: %Computer equipment20-33 (mainly 33)Office furniture and equipment6 - 10 (mainly 10)Machinery and laboratory equipment15Field service units50Leasehold improvementsOver the shorter of the leaseterm or estimated useful life h.Impairment of Long-Lived Assets:The Company’s long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment in accordance with ASC No. 360, “Property, Plant and Equipment” whenever eventsor changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset (or asset group) may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets (or assetgroup) to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to the future undiscounted cash flows expected to begenerated by the assets. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which thecarrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. During the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, no impairment losseshave been recorded. i.Other long term assets:Other long term assets include long-term prepaid expenses and deposits for offices and cars leasing. j.Revenue Recognition: The Company and its subsidiaries generate revenues from sales of products. The Company and its subsidiaries sell their products through a directsales force and through distributors. Revenues are recognized in accordance with ASC No. 605, “Revenue Recognition” (“ASC 605”), when delivery has occurred, persuasive evidenceof an agreement exists, the fee is fixed and determinable, collectability is reasonably assured and no further obligations exist. Provisions are made atthe time of revenue recognition for any applicable warranty cost expected to be incurred.F-11REWALK ROBOTICS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIESNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The timing for revenue recognition amongst the various products and customers is dependent upon satisfaction of such criteria and generally variesfrom either shipment or delivery to the customer depending on the specific shipping terms of a given transaction, as stipulated in the agreement witheach customer. Other than pricing terms which may differ due to the different volumes of purchases between distributors and end-users, there are no materialdifferences in the terms and arrangements involving direct and indirect customers.The Company’s products sold through agreements with distributors are non-exchangeable, non-refundable, non-returnable and without any rights ofprice protection or share rotation. Accordingly, the Company considers all the distributors to be end-users.The Company generally does not grant a right of return for its products. There have been a few occasions in which the Company experienced areturn of its products. Therefore, the Company records reductions to revenue for expected future product returns based on the Company’s historicalexperience. For systems sold to rehabilitation facilities the Company includes training and considers the elements in the arrangement to be a single unit ofaccounting. In accordance with ASC 605, the Company has concluded that the training is essential to the functionality of the Company’s systems.Therefore the Company recognizes revenue for the system and training only after delivery in accordance with the agreement delivery terms to thecustomer and after the training has been completed, once all other revenue recognition criteria have been met.For sales of Personal systems to end users, and for sales of Personal or Rehabilitation systems to third party distributors, the Company does notprovide training to the end user as this training is completed by the Rehabilitation centers or by the distributor that have previously completed theReWalk Training program. Therefore the Company recognizes revenue in such sales upon delivery, assuming the other conditions for revenuerecognition have been met.In certain cases, when product arrangements are bundled with extended warranty, the separation of the extended warranty falls under the scope ofASC 605-20-25-1 through 25-6, and the separately price of the extended warranty stated in the agreement is deferred and recognized ratably over theextended warranty period.Deferred revenue includes primarily unearned amounts received in respect of service contracts but not yet recognized as revenues. The Companyalso offers a rent-to-purchase option of its ReWalk Personal device. Those transactions provide potential customers the option to lease the device fora short term, after which they can choose whether to purchase it. In such cases the Company recognize revenues over the period of the rent once allother revenue criteria are met.kAccounting for Share-Based Compensation:The Company accounts for share-based compensation in accordance with ASC No. 718, “Compensation-Stock Compensation” (“ASC No. 718”).ASC No. 718 requires companies to estimate the fair value of equity-based payment awards on the date of grant using an Option-Pricing Model(“OPM”). The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as an expense over the requisite service periods inthe Company’s consolidated statements of operations.The Company recognizes compensation expenses for the value of its awards granted based on the straight-line method over the requisite serviceperiod of each of the awards, net of estimated forfeitures. ASC No. 718 requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, ifnecessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Estimated forfeitures are based on actual historical pre-vestingforfeitures.The Company selected the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model as the most appropriate fair value method for its share-option awards. Theoption-pricing model requires a number of assumptions, of which the most significant are the fair market value of the underlying ordinary share,expected share price volatility and the expected option term. Expected volatility was calculated based upon certain peer companies that theCompany considered to be comparable. The expected option term represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding.The expected option term is determined based on the simplified method in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 110, as adequatehistorical experience is not available to provide a reasonable estimate. The simplified method will continue to apply until enough historicalexperience is available to provide a reasonable estimate of the expected term. The risk-free interest rate is based on the yield from U.S. treasurybonds with an equivalent term. The Company has historically not paid dividends and has no foreseeable plans to pay dividends.F-12REWALK ROBOTICS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIESNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The fair value of the ordinary shares underlying the share options has historically been determined by the Company’s board of directors. As prior tothe Company’s IPO, there had been no public market for the Company’s ordinary shares, the board of directors determined fair value of the ordinaryshares at the time of grant of the option by considering a number of objective and subjective factors including data from other comparablecompanies, sales of ordinary shares and convertible preferred share to unrelated third parties, operating and financial performance, the lack ofliquidity of capital share and general and industry specific economic outlook, among other factors.Since the distributions and participation rights to security holders are different in a sale/liquidation scenario versus an IPO, the valuation of theCompany was performed using a weighted average of the values derived from the following scenarios: 1) discounted cash flow (DCF) model, and theOPM method was then employed to allocate the enterprise value amongst the Company’s various equity classes, deriving a fully marketable valueper share for the ordinary share; 2) IPO scenario; and 3) Implied value approach. Before the per share value was determined, a discount for lack ofmarketability and a voting right differential was applied, as applicable, to the ordinary shares and the founders shares.Following the IPO in September 2014, the fair value of ordinary shares is observable as they are publicly traded.The fair value of Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) granted is determined based on the price of the Company's ordinary shares on the date of grant.The fair value for options granted in 2016, 2015 and 2014 is estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model withthe following assumptions: December 31, 2016 2015 2014Expected volatility53%-60% 60% 60%-70%Risk-free rate1.16%-1.60% 1.60%-1.95% 1.74%-1.95%Dividend yield—% —% —%Expected term (in years)5.31 - 6.11 5.73 - 6.11 5.81 - 6.11Share price$6.80 - $11.88 $7.30 - $20.97 $1.49 - $20.77The Company accounts for options granted to consultants and other service providers under ASC No. 718 and ASC No. 505, “Equity-basedpayments to non-employees.” The fair value of these options was estimated using a Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model. In 2016, 2015 and2014 the non-cash compensation expenses related to nonemployees were immaterial. The non-cash compensation expenses related to employees and non employees for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 amounted to$3,398 thousand, $2,345 thousand and $5,179 thousand respectively. l.Research and Development Costs: Research and development costs are charged to the consolidated statement of operations as incurred and are presented net of the amount of anygrants we receive for research and development in the period in which we receive the grant.m.Income TaxesThe Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC No. 740, “Income Taxes” (“ASC No. 740”), using the liability method wherebydeferred tax assets and liability account balances are determined based on the differences between financial reporting and the tax basis for assets andliabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. The Companyprovides a valuation allowance, if necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to the amounts that are more likely-than-not to be realized. F-13REWALK ROBOTICS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIESNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ASC No. 740 contains a two-step approach to recognizing and measuring a liability for uncertain tax positions. The first step is to evaluate the taxposition taken or expected to be taken in a tax return by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not that,on an evaluation of the technical merits, the tax position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of any related appeals or litigationprocesses. The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement.The Company accrues interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in its taxes on income. n.Warranty: The Company provides a two-year standard warranty for its products. The Company records a provision for the estimated cost to repair or replaceproducts under warranty at the time of sale. Factors that affect the Company’s warranty reserve include the number of units sold, historical andanticipated rates of warranty repairs and the cost per repair. US Dollars in thousandsBalance at December 31, 2015$502Provision400Usage(404)Balance at December 31, 2016$498o.Concentrations of Credit Risks: Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash, cash equivalents and tradereceivables.The Company’s cash and cash equivalents are deposited in major banks in Israel, the United States and Germany. Such deposits in the United Statesmay be in excess of insured limits and are not insured in other jurisdictions. The Company maintains cash and cash equivalents with diversefinancial institutions and monitors the amount of credit exposure to each financial institution.Concentration of credit risk with respect to trade receivable is primarily limited to a customer to which the Company makes substantial sales. onecustomer represented 0% and 21% of the Company's trade receivable, net balance as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectivelyThe Company’s trade receivables are geographically diversified and derived primarily from sales to customers in various countries, mainly in theUnited States and Europe. Concentration of credit risk with respect to trade receivables is limited by credit limits, ongoing credit evaluation andaccount monitoring procedures. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its distributors based upon a specific review of all significantoutstanding invoices. The Company writes off receivables when they are deemed uncollectible and having exhausted all collection efforts. As ofDecember 31, 2016 and 2015 trade receivables are presented net of $333 thousand and $144 thousand allowance for doubtful accounts and net ofsales return reserve of $105 thousand and $0, respectively.p.Accrued Severance Pay: Pursuant to Israel’s Severance Pay Law, Israeli employees are entitled to severance pay equal to one month’s salary for each year of employment, or aportion thereof. All of the employees of the RRL elected to be included under section 14 of the Severance Pay Law, 1963 (“section 14”). Accordingto this section, these employees are entitled only to monthly deposits, at a rate of 8.33% of their monthly salary, made in their name with insurancecompanies. Payments in accordance with section 14 release the Company from any future severance payments (under the above Israeli SeverancePay Law) in respect of those employees; therefore, related assets and liabilities are not presented in the balance sheet.Total Company expenses related to severance pay amounted to $226 thousand, $202 thousand and $170 thousand for the years ended December 31,2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.F-14REWALK ROBOTICS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIESNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS q.Fair Value Measurements: Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or mostadvantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The Company uses athree-tier fair value hierarchy to classify and disclose all assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, as well as assets andliabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis, in periods subsequent to their initial measurement. The hierarchy requires the Company touse observable inputs when available, and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs when determining fair value. If a financial instrument usesinputs that fall in different levels of the hierarchy, the instrument will be categorized based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to thefair value calculation. The three-tiers are defined as follows:•Level 1. Observable inputs based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;•Level 2. Inputs, other than quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and•Level 3. Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data requiring the Company to develop its own assumptions.The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, short term deposits, trade receivables and trade payables approximate their fair value due to theshort-term maturity of such instruments.r.Basic and Diluted Net Loss Per Share:Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted-average number of shares of ordinary shares outstanding during theperiod.Diluted net loss per share is computed by giving effect to all potential shares of ordinary shares, including stock options, convertible preferred sharewarrants, to the extent dilutive, all in accordance with ASC No. 260, “Earning Per Share”.The following table sets forth the computation of the Company’s basic and diluted net loss per ordinary share (in thousands, except share and pershare data): Year endedDecember 31 2016 2015 2014Net loss$(32,503) $(25,415) $(21,668)Convertible preferred shares dividend— — (2,229) Net loss attributable to ordinary shares(32,503) (25,415) (23,897)Shares used in computing net loss per ordinary shares, basic and diluted13,178,107 12,115,038 3,766,694 Net loss per ordinary share, basic and diluted$(2.47) $(2.10) $(6.34)Basic and diluted net loss per share was the same for each period presented as the inclusion of all potential shares of ordinary shares outstandingwould have been anti-dilutive.s.Contingent liabilities The Company accounts for its contingent liabilities in accordance with ASC No. 450, “Contingencies”. A provision is recorded when it is bothprobable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. With respect to legal matters, provisions are reviewed and adjusted to reflect the impact of negotiations, estimated settlements, legal rulings, adviceof legal counsel and other information and events pertaining to a particular matter.See note 7e for further information. F-15REWALK ROBOTICS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIESNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS t.Government grantsGovernment grants received by the Company relating to categories of operating expenditures are credited to the consolidated statements ofoperations during the period in which the expenditure to which they relate is charged. Royalty and non-royalty-bearing grants from the IsraelInnovation Authority, or the IIA, (formerly known as the Israeli Office of the Chief Scientist), from the Israel-U.S. Binational Industrial Research andDevelopment Foundation (“BIRD”) and from the Israeli Fund for Promoting Overseas Marketing for funding certain approved research anddevelopment projects and sales and marketing activities are recognized at the time when the Company is entitled to such grants, on the basis of therelated costs incurred, and are included as a deduction from research and development or sales and marketing expenses (see Note 7c).The Company recorded royalty-bearing grants in the amount of $0, $214 and $76 for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014,respectively, as part of the research and development expenses.The Company recorded royalty expenses in the amount of $0, $0 and $204 for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, aspart of the cost of revenues. u.New Accounting Pronouncementsi.Revenues:In 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASU 2014-09”), whichprovides a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and willsupersede most current revenue recognition guidance. In 2016, the FASB issued four amendments to ASU 2014-09. The standard iseffective for public companies for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted as of oneyear prior to the current effective date. The guidance permits two implementation approaches, one requiring retrospective application of thenew standard with restatement of prior years and one requiring prospective application of the new standard with disclosure of results underold standards. The Company has not selected an implementation approach. The Company elected not to adopt the standard early and iscurrently evaluating the impact of the pending adoption of this ASU on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.ii. Going concern:In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements - Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40):Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern.” ASU 2014-15 is intended to define management’sresponsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an organization’s ability to continue as a going concern and to providerelated footnote disclosures. The amendments in this ASU are effective for reporting periods ending after December 15, 2016, with earlyadoption permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2014-15 for the year ended December 31, 2016 and updated the going concern disclosureaccordingly.ii.Inventory:In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, "Inventory (Topic 330), Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory," which changesthe measurement principle for inventory from the lower of cost or market to lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value isdefined as the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal andtransportation. ASU 2015-11 eliminates the guidance that entities consider replacement cost or net realizable value less an approximatelynormal profit margin in the subsequent measurement of inventory when cost is determined on a first-in, first-out or average cost basis. Theprovisions of ASU 2015-11 are effective for public entities with fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods withinthose fiscal years. The adoption of this guidance by the Company is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidatedfinancial statements.F-16REWALK ROBOTICS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIESNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS iii.Leases:In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). Under the new guidance, a lessee will berequired to recognize assets and liabilities for all leases with lease terms of more than 12 months. Consistent with current generally acceptedaccounting principles, the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee primarilywill depend on its classification as a finance or operating lease. This ASU requires additional disclosures. The standard is effective forannual periods beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods within those fiscal years. The ASU requires adoption based upon amodified retrospective transition approach. Early adoption is permitted. The Company has not yet determined whether it will elect earlyadoption and is currently evaluating the impact of the pending adoption of this ASU on the Company's consolidated financial statementsand related disclosures.iv.Share Based Compensation:In March 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the "FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU")No. 2016-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718). The new guidance simplifies several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including forfeitures which can take effect when they occur, the income tax consequences, classification ofawards, as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. The standard also requires that shares withheld tosatisfy tax withholding obligations associated with the vesting of restricted stock awarded to employees to be presented as a financingactivity in the statement of cash flows. The amendments in this standard are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15,2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted. The Company adopted this ASU effective January 1,2017 and have elected to change our accounting policy regarding forfeitures. Previously, we estimated forfeitures expected to occur in thedetermination of compensation costs. Going forward we will recognize forfeitures in the period they occur. The Company does not expectthe adoption to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.v.Cash Flow:In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments.” Thestandard addresses several matters of diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in thestatement of cash flows including the presentation of debt extinguishment costs and distributions received from equity methodinvestments. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods and allows forretrospective adoption with early adoption permitted. The Company has not yet determined whether it will elect early adoption and iscurrently evaluating the impact of the pending adoption of this ASU on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.On November 17, 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (a consensus ofthe FASB Emerging Issues Task Force).” This ASU requires the statement of cash flows to explain the change during the period in the totalof cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Therefore, amounts generallydescribed as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents are to be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling thebeginning of period and end of period amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. ASU No. 2016-18 will be effective for us as ofJanuary 1, 2018. The Company is currently reviewing the effect of this ASU to the Company's financial statements.F-17REWALK ROBOTICS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIESNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOTE 3:- PREPAID EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT ASSETSThe components of prepaid expenses and other current assets are as follows (in thousands): December 31, 2016 2015Government institutions$113 $209Prepaid expenses355 316Deposit— 43Deferred tax152 147Other assets671 512 $1,291 $1,227NOTE 4:- INVENTORIESThe components of inventory are as follows (in thousands): December 31, 2016 2015Raw materials$— $450Finished products3,264 2,084 $3,264 $2,534NOTE 5:- PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NETThe components of property and equipment, net are as follows (in thousands): December 31, 2016 2015Cost: Computer equipment$709 $656Office furniture and equipment293 286Machinery and laboratory equipment573 471Field service units771 575Leasehold improvements358 113 2,704 2,101 December 31, 2016 2015Accumulated depreciation1,446 773 Property and equipment, net$1,258 $1,328 Depreciation expenses amounted to $696 thousand, $438 thousand and $111 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.F-18REWALK ROBOTICS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIESNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOTE 6:- LOAN AGREEMENT WITH KREOS AND RELATED WARRANT TO PURCHASE ORDINARY SHARESOn December 30, 2015, the Company entered into the Loan Agreement with Kreos pursuant to which Kreos extended a line of credit to us in theamount of $20.0 million. On January 4, 2016, the Company drew down $12.0 million under the Loan Agreement. Under the terms of the Loan Agreement theCompany were entitled to draw down up to an additional $8.0 million until December 31, 2016, if the Company raised $10.0 million or more in the issuanceof shares of our capital stock (including debt convertible into shares of its capital stock) by December 31, 2016. On December 28, 2016, the Company drewdown the remaining $8.0 million available under the Loan Agreement. Pursuant to the Loan Agreement, the Company granted Kreos a first priority securityinterest over all of its assets, including intellectual property and equity interests in its subsidiaries, subject to certain permitted security interests.The Loan has a maturity of 36 months and bears annual interest of 10.75%, which is to be paid monthly. The principal of the Loan is to be paid in24 monthly payments, beginning in January 2017, except for the last loan payment, which was paid in advance on the Draw Down Date (as defined below).The repayment period will be extended to 36 months if the Company raises $20.0 million or more in connection with the issuance of shares of its capitalstock (including debt securities convertible into shares of the Company’s capital stock) prior to the expiration of the respective initial 24-month period.On January 4, 2016 (the “Draw Down Date”), the Company drew down $12.0 million, net of $415 thousand in loan transaction fees and and $660thousand as advance payment. Additional loan transaction fees in the amount of $26 thousand were paid after the Draw Down Date. Out of the $441thousand in total loan transaction fees, $140 thousand were deferred until December 28, 2016 when the Company drew down the remaining $8.0 millionavailable under the Loan Agreement. Total fees paid during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, in connection with the Loan Agreement amounted to$501 thousand.Repayment of the Loan and payment of all other amounts owed to Kreos are to be made in U.S. dollars. The Company recorded interest expense in the amount of $2 million during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.In connection with the Loan Agreement, on December 30, 2015, the Company also granted Kreos a warrant to purchase 119,295 ordinary shares ofthe Company at an exercise price of $9.64 per share. In connection with the $8.0 million drawdown under the Loan Agreement on December 28, 2016, theCompany has granted additional warrants of 47,717. The total number of warrants represents the right to purchase167,012 ordinary shares. The increase wasbased on the terms of the warrant, which provide that the amount of the warrant will be increased by 5.75% of any additional drawdowns. The Kreos warrantis exercisable, in whole or in part, at any time prior to the earliest of (i) December 30, 2025 or (ii) immediately prior to the consummation of a merger,consolidation, or reorganization of the Company with or into, or the sale or license of all or substantially all the assets or shares of the Company to, any otherentity or person, other than a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, excluding any transaction in which shareholders of the Company prior to thetransaction will hold more than 50% of the voting and economic rights of the surviving entity after the transaction.On December 30, 2015 and December 28, 2016, the Company calculated the value of its freestanding warrant to purchase its ordinary shares in theamount of $1.2 million (net of $42 thousand issuance expenses) and $78 thousand (net of $2 thousand issuance expenses), respectively, by using the relativefair value method and utilizing an option pricing method. The Company has recorded the value of the Kreos Warrant, together with the Loan's issuance costs,as debt discount which is being accreted as interest expense using the effective-interest method over the remaining term of the Loan.F-19REWALK ROBOTICS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIESNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The following assumptions were used to estimate the value of the Kreos warrant on December 28, 2016 and December 30, 2015: December 28,2016December 30,2015Expected volatility53%60%Risk-free rate2.51%2.52%Dividend yield—%—%Expected term (in years)910F-20REWALK ROBOTICS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIESNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOTE 7:- COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIESa.Purchase commitment:The Company has contractual obligations to purchase goods from its contract manufacturer. Purchase obligations do not include contracts that maybe canceled without penalty. As of December 31, 2016, non-cancelable outstanding obligations amounted to approximately $2.2 million.b.Lease commitment: the Company operates from leased facilities in Israel, the United States and Germany. These leases expire between 2017 and2025.The future minimum lease commitments of the Company and its subsidiaries under various non-cancelable operating lease agreements in respect ofpremises, that are in effect as of December 31, 2016, are as follows:20174952018547201955820205672021 and Thereafter2,219Total$4,386Total rent expenses for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 were $650 thousand, $260 thousand and $168 thousand,respectively.RRL and RRG lease cars for their employees under cancelable operating lease agreements expiring at various dates in 2017-2019.RRL and RRG have an option to be released from these agreements, which may result in penalties in a maximum amount of approximately$53 thousand as of December 31, 2016.c.Royalties:The Company’s research and development efforts are financed, in part, through funding from the IIA and BIRD. Since the Company’sinception through December 31, 2016, the Company received funding from the IIA and BIRD in the total amount of $740 thousand and $500thousand, respectively. Out of the $740 thousand in funding from the IIA, a total amount of $340 thousand were royalty bearing grants (as ofDecember 31, 2016, the Company paid royalties to the IIA in the total amount of $50), while a total amount of $400 thousand was received inconsideration of 5,237 convertible preferred A shares. The Company is obligated to pay royalties to the IIA, amounting to 3%-3.5% of the sales ofthe products and other related revenues generated from such projects, up to 100% of the grants received. The royalty payment obligations also bearinterest at the LIBOR rate. The obligation to pay these royalties is contingent on actual sales of the applicable products and in the absence of suchsales, no payment is required. The Company was obligated to pay royalties to the BIRD amounting to 5% of the sales of the products and otherrelated revenues generated from such projects, up to 150% of the grants received. During December 2014, the Company recorded a liability of $466thousand as a settlement for the prepayment of amounts due under the agreement with BIRD, representing the full balance of the contingent liabilityrelated to grants received (including interest), which was paid in January 2015. Upon making this payment, the Company eliminated all futureroyalty obligations related to its anticipated revenues. These expenses are included in the cost of revenues in the consolidated statement ofoperations.For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, the royalties expenses recorded in cost of revenues amounted to $0, $0 and $204thousand respectively.As of December 31, 2016, the contingent liability to the IIA amounted to $290 thousand, and there was no contingent liability to the BIRD.The Israeli Research and Development Law provides that know-how developed under an approved research and development program may not betransferred to third parties without the approval of the IIA. Such approval is not required for the sale or export of any products resulting from suchresearch or development. TheF-21REWALK ROBOTICS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIESNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS IIA, under special circumstances, may approve the transfer of IIA-funded know-how outside Israel, in the following cases: (a) the grant recipient pays to the IIA a portion of the sale price paid in consideration for such IIA-funded know-how or in consideration for the saleof the grant recipient itself, as the case may be, which portion will not exceed six times the amount of the grants received plus interest (or three timesthe amount of the grant received plus interest, in the event that the recipient of the know-how has committed to retain the R&D activities of the grantrecipient in Israel after the transfer); (b) the grant recipient receives know-how from a third party in exchange for its IIA-funded know-how; (c) suchtransfer of IIA-funded know-how arises in connection with certain types of cooperation in research and development activities; or (d) If such transferof know-how arises in connection with a liquidation by reason of insolvency or receivership of the grant recipient.d. LiensIn connection with the Loan Agreement, the Company granted Kreos a first priority security interest over all of its assets, includingintellectual property and equity interests in its subsidiaries, subject to certain permitted security interests.The Company's long-term other assets in the amount of $820 thousand have been pledged as security in respect of a guarantee granted to athird party. Such deposit cannot be pledged to others or withdrawn without the consent of such third party.e.Legal Claims:Occasionally the Company is involved in various claims, lawsuits, regulatory examinations, investigations and other legal matters arising,for the most part, in the ordinary course of business. The outcome of litigation and other legal matters is inherently uncertain. In making adetermination regarding accruals, using available information, the Company evaluates the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome in legal orregulatory proceedings to which the Company is a party and records a loss contingency when it is probable a liability has been incurred and theamount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Where the Company determines an unfavorable outcome is not probable or reasonably estimable,the Company does not accrue for any potential litigation loss. These subjective determinations are based on the status of such legal or regulatoryproceedings, the merits of our defenses and consultation with legal counsel. Actual outcomes of these legal and regulatory proceedings maymaterially differ from the Company’s current estimates. It is possible that resolution of one or more of the legal matters currently pending orthreatened could result in losses material to the Company’s consolidated results of operations, liquidity or financial condition.As set forth below, between September 2016 and January 2017, eight substantially similar putative securities class actions were filedagainst the Company. Four of these actions have been dismissed on procedural grounds and four are pending, including two actions which havebeen consolidated and one action brought by the plaintiffs whose actions were dismissed.•Dismissed Actions: On September 20, November 3, November 9, and November 10, 2016, respectively, four putative class actions on behalf ofalleged shareholders that purchased or acquired the Company's ordinary shares pursuant and/or traceable to the registration statement used inconnection with the Company's IPO were commenced in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Mateo. The actions were filedagainst the Company, certain of the Company's current and former directors and officers, and the underwriters of the Company's IPO. We refer tothese actions as the California State Actions. The complaints in the California State Actions asserted various claims under the Securities Act. Eachof the California State Actions was dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction in January 2017.•Pending Actions:◦On or about October 31, 2016, a class action with claims substantially similar to the California State Actions was commenced in theMassachusetts Superior Court, Suffolk County, by a different plaintiff (Civ. Action No. 16-3336), alleging claims under Section 11 of theSecurities Act against the Company, certain of the Company's current and former directors and officers, and the underwriters of theCompany's IPO, and alleging claims under Section 15 of the Securities Act against the Company and certain of the Company's current andformer directors and officers.◦On or about November 30, 2016, a substantially similar class action was commenced in the Massachusetts Superior Court, Suffolk County,by a different plaintiff (Civ. Action No. 16-3670) alleging claims underF-22REWALK ROBOTICS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIESNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Sections 11 and Section 15 of the Securities Act against the same defendants as in the action commenced on October 31, 2016, and alsoalleging claims under Section 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act against the Company, certain of the Company's current and former directorsand officers, and the underwriters of the Company's IPO. This action was ordered consolidated in the Massachusetts Superior Court,Suffolk County on January 9, 2017 with the action commenced on October 31, 2016, and the two actions are referred to as theConsolidated Massachusetts State Court Actions.◦On or about January 24, 2017, a substantially similar class action was commenced in the United States District Court for the NorthernDistrict of California (Case No. 3:17-cv-362) alleging the same claims against the same defendants as in the action commenced onNovember 30, 2016, except that the Section 15 claim was not asserted against the underwriters, and the Section 11 and Section 15 claimswere also asserted against certain entities referred to as the Venture Capital Defendants, who are alleged in the complaint to havebeneficially owned, directly or indirectly, approximately 51% of the Company’s stock upon the closing of the IPO. This action is referredto as the California Federal Court Action.◦On or about January 31, 2017, a substantially similar class action was commenced in the United States District Court for the District ofMassachusetts (Case No. 1:17-cv-10169) by the same plaintiffs who commenced the California State Court Actions, and one additionalplaintiff, alleging claims under Section 11 and 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act against the Company, certain of the Company's current andformer directors and officers, and the underwriters of the Company's IPO, and alleging claims under Section 15 of the Securities Act againstcertain of the Company's current and former directors and officers. This action is referred to as the Massachusetts Federal Court Action.The plaintiffs in the Consolidated Massachusetts State Court Actions are expected to file a consolidated amended complaint on or about March 13,2017. The Company has not yet responded to the complaints in the California Federal Court Action and the Massachusetts Federal Court Action.The complaints in all of the actions listed above allege that the Company's registration statement used in connection with its IPO failed to disclosethat the Company was unprepared or unable to comply with certain regulatory special controls and to provide the FDA with a post-market surveillancestudy on the Company's ReWalk Personal device, and that, as a result of such alleged omission, the plaintiffs suffered damages. The Company believes thatthe allegations made in the complaints are without merit and intends to defend itself vigorously against the complaints relating to the four pending actions.Based on information currently available and the early stage of the litigation, the Company is unable to reasonably estimate a possible loss orrange of possible losses, if any, with regard to these lawsuits; therefore, no litigation reserve has been recorded in the Company's consolidated balance sheetsas of December 31, 2016. The Company will continue to evaluate information as it becomes known and will record an estimate for losses at the time or timeswhen it is probable that a loss will be incurred and the amount of the loss is reasonably estimable.NOTE 8:- SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITYa.Ordinary shares:The ordinary shares of the Company confer on the holders thereof voting rights, rights to receive dividends and rights toparticipate in distribution of assets upon liquidation after any outstanding preferred shares receive their preference amount. The ordinary Ashares and ordinary B shares were restated as ordinary shares in accordance with the following:On August 26, 2014, in a duly convened extraordinary general meeting of the shareholders of the Company, the shareholders (i)duly approved an amendment of the Company's Articles of Association which subsequently entered effect upon the Company's initialpublic offering, under which the Company's authorized share capital was increased and restated as NIS 2,500,000 divided into 250,000,000ordinary shares, par value NIS 0.01, and (ii) ratified an updated capitalization table of the Company, which represented each shareholder'sholdings in the Company following the aforementioned restatement of the Company's authorized share capital.b.All ordinary shares, options, exercise prices and loss per share amounts have been adjusted retroactively for all periods presented in thesefinancial statements, to reflect the 17-to-1 bonus share issuance (equivalent to an 18-for-1 share split) effected on August 26, 2014.F-23REWALK ROBOTICS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIESNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS c.Equity raise:1.At-the-market offering program:On May 10, 2016, the Company entered into the Equity Distribution Agreement with Piper Jaffray pursuant to which it may offerand sell, from time to time, ordinary shares having an aggregate offering price of up to $25 million, through Piper Jaffray acting as its agent.Subject to the terms and conditions of the Equity Distribution Agreement, Piper Jaffray will use its commercially reasonable efforts to sellon the Company’s behalf all of the ordinary shares requested to be sold by the Company, consistent with its normal trading and salespractices. Piper Jaffray may also act as principal in the sale of ordinary shares under the Equity Distribution Agreement. Sales may be madeunder the Company's registration statement on Form S-3, which was declared effective on May 9, 2016, in what may be deemed “at-the-market” equity offerings as defined in Rule 415 promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Sales may be made directly onor through the Nasdaq Global Market, the existing trading market for the Company's ordinary shares, to or through a market maker otherthan on an exchange or otherwise, in negotiated transactions at market prices prevailing at the time of sale or at prices related to suchprevailing market prices, and/or any other method permitted by law, including in privately negotiated transactions. Piper Jaffray is entitledto compensation at a fixed commission rate of 3.0% of the gross sales price per share sold through it as agent under the Equity DistributionAgreement. Where Piper Jaffray acts as principal in the sale of ordinary shares under the Equity Distribution Agreement, such rate ofcompensation will not apply, but in no event will the total compensation of Piper Jaffray, when combined with the reimbursement of PiperJaffray for the out-of-pocket fees and disbursements of its legal counsel, exceed 8.0% of the gross proceeds received from the sale of theordinary shares. The Company is not required to sell any of its ordinary shares at any time.As of December 31, 2016, the Company had sold 692,062 ordinary shares under the ATM Offering Program for grossproceeds of $4.6 million and net proceeds to the Company of $4.1 million (after commissions, fees and expenses). Additionally, as of thatdate, the Company had paid Piper Jaffray compensation of $137 thousand and had incurred total expenses of approximately $468 thousandin connection with the ATM Offering Program.2. Follow-on OfferingOn October 27, 2016, the Company has entered into the Underwriting Agreement with Oppenheimer, in connection with theCompany's follow-on public offering of 3,250,000 units, each consisting of one ordinary share and 0.75 of a warrant to purchase oneordinary share. Each unit was sold to the public at a price of $3.75 per unit. The units were not issued or certificated, and the ordinary sharesand warrants underlying the units were immediately separable and issued separately. The warrants are not listed on the Nasdaq GlobalMarket, any other national securities exchange or any other nationally recognized trading system. The ordinary shares and the warrantsunderlying the units and the ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants are registered under the Securities Act on the Company'sForm S-3.The offering closed on November 1, 2016. The Company's gross proceeds were $12.2 million. The Company's estimated netaggregate proceeds, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated expenses, were $11.1 million. The Companyalso granted Oppenheimer an option to purchase up to 487,500 additional units at the public offering price, less the underwriting discount,for 30 days after October 27, 2016. Oppenheimer did not exercise these options. All estimates of net aggregate proceeds assume that none ofthe Warrants issued in the offering will be exercised. d.Share Option Plans:On March 30, 2012, the Company’s board of directors adopted the ReWalk Robotics Ltd. 2012 Equity Incentive Plan.F-24REWALK ROBOTICS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIESNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS On August 19, 2014, the Company’s board of directors adopted the ReWalk Robotics Ltd. 2014 Incentive Compensation Plan orthe "Plan". The Plan provides for the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, cash-based awards, other stock-based awards and dividend equivalents to the Company’s and its affiliates’ respective employees, non-employeedirectors and consultants.Starting in 2014, the Company grants to directors and employees RSUs under this Plan. An RSU award is an agreement to issueshares of our common stock at the time the award is vested.As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company had reserved 380,153 and 420,469 shares of ordinary shares, respectively,available for issuance to employees, directors, officers and non-employees of the Company.The share reserve pool will increase on January 1 of each calendar year during the term of the 2014 Plan in an amount equal to thelesser of: (x) 972,000, (y) 4% of the total number of shares outstanding on December 31 of the immediately preceding calendar year, and (z)an amount determined by the Company's board of directors.The options generally vest over four year, with certain options granted to non-employee directors during the fiscal year endedDecember 31, 2016, vesting over one year. Any option that is forfeited or canceled before expiration becomes available for future grants under the Plan.A summary of employee share options and RSUs activity during the fiscal year ended 2016 is as follows: Year Ended December 31, 2016 Number Averageexerciseprice Averageremainingcontractuallife (years) (1) Aggregateintrinsicvalue (inthousands)Options and RSUs outstanding at the beginning of the year1,853,369 6.12 8.37 17,048Options granted391,285 9.25 RSUs granted177,528 — Options exercised (2)(104,555) $1.29 RSUs vested (2)(37,704) $— RSUs forfeited(1,487) $— Options forfeited(27,422) $9.74 Options and RSUs outstanding at the end of the year2,251,014 6.47 7.80 1,740 Options and RSUs vested and expected to vest2,208,737 6.47 7.79 1,700 Options exercisable at the end of the year997,977 5.42 6.89 939(1)Calculation of weighted average remaining contractual term does not include the RSUs that were granted, which have an indefinitecontractual term.(2)During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, the aggregate number of ordinary shares that were issued pursuant to RSUs that becamevested and options that were exercised on a net basis was 128,496 ordinary shares.The weighted average grant date fair values of options granted during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 were $4.75,$5.36 and $4.74 respectively. The weighted average grant date fair values of RSUs granted during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and2014,were $9.28, $20.77 and $20.97 respectively. F-25REWALK ROBOTICS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIESNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total intrinsic value that would have been received by the option holders had alloption holders, which hold options with positive intrinsic value, exercised their options on the last date of the exercise period. Total intrinsic value ofoptions exercised for the year ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 were $844 thousand, $2.1 million and $38 thousand, respectively. Total fair valueof shares vested during the year ended December 31, 2016 , 2015 and 2014 were $3,626 thousand, $2,164 thousand and $655 thousand respectively. As ofDecember 31, 2016, there were $7.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements grantedunder the 2012 and 2014 Plans. This cost is expected to be recognized over a period of approximately 2.5 years. The number of options and RSUs outstanding as of December 31, 2016 is set forth below, with options separated by range of exercise price: Range of exercise price Options and RSUsOutstanding as ofDecember 31, 2016 Weightedaverageremainingcontractuallife (years) (1) Options and RSUsoutstanding as ofDecember 31, 2016 Weightedaverageremainingcontractuallife (years) (1)RSUs only 226,598 — — —$0.82 34,377 4.03 34,377 4.03$1.32 342,390 5.45 338,145 5.43$1.48 403,125 7.03 281,243 7.03$6.80-$8.99 761,211 8.93 195,249 8.86$9.22-$10.98 223,056 9.35 6,273 9.27$19.62-$20.97 260,257 7.98 142,690 7.98 2,251,014 7.80 997,977 6.89 (1)Calculation of weighted average remaining contractual term does not include the RSUs that were granted, which have an indefinitecontractual term.e.Options issued to consultants: The Company’s outstanding options and RSUs granted to non-employees as of December 31, 2016 were as follows: Issuance dateOptions forshares ofordinaryshare Exercisepriceper share Optionsexercisable Exercisablethrough (number) (number) March 12, 20073,454 $— 3,454 March 12, 2017On May 28, 2016, the Company entered into an agreement (the “Consulting Agreement”) with a separate non-employee consultant (the“Consultant”), under which the Consultant agreed to assist the Company in commercially promoting and expanding insurance coverage of the Company’sReWalk devices. Compensation under the Consulting Agreement is due and payable only if the Consultant is successful, and will consist of agreed amountsin cash or ordinary shares and a percentage of certain sales resulting from the Consultant’s efforts. Additionally, the Company has agreed to pay theConsultant 10 percent of the increase in the Company’s market capitalization following the dates when coverage becomes active under national insurancepolicies that the Consultant secures for the Company. The increase in the Company’s market capitalization will be determined based on the increase betweenthe average closing price over the ten days before disclosure of a relevant coverage decision and the average closing price over the ten dayscommencing 80 days after such disclosure. These variable payments, which will be made only for the first five national insurance policies the Consultantattains for the Company, (1) may be made in cash or stock at the Company’s choice and (2) may not exceed (i) $6.0 million for the date that the first nationalcoverage policy takes effect, (ii) $5.0 million for the date that the second national coverage policy takes effect and (iii) $2.0 million for each of the dates thatthe next three national coverage policies take effect. The Company may need to seek shareholder approval pursuant to the rules of The Nasdaq StockF-26REWALK ROBOTICS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIESNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Market LLC should the Company elect to make such payments in stock. The Consulting Agreement has a term of 12 months, which will extend to 18 monthsif the Consultant secures a national coverage policy with certain insurers in the first 12 months and to 24 months if the Consultant secures at least two morenational coverage policies within the first 18 months. Due to the fact that the compensation under the Consulting Agreement is based on achievement, theCompany had not made any cash payments or issued any ordinary shares to the Consultant under the Consulting Agreement as of December 31, 2016.f.Warrants to purchase ordinary sharesDuring the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, a total of 138,702 warrants were exercised on a cashless basis into 45,116 ordinary shares.The following table summarizes information about warrants outstanding and exercisable as of December 31, 2016:Issuance dateWarrantsoutstanding Exercisepriceper warrant Warrantsexercisable Exercisablethrough (number) (number) July 14, 2014 (1)403,804 $10.08 403,804 July 13, 2018December 30, 2015 (2)119,295 $9.64 119,295 See footnote (2)November 1, 2016 (3)2,437,500 $4.75 2,437,500 November 1, 2021December 28, 2016 (4)47,717 $9.64 47,717 See footnote (2) 3,008,316 3,008,316 (1) Represents warrants to purchase ordinary shares at an exercise price of $10.08 per share, which were granted on July 14, 2014 as part of our series Einvestment round.(2) Represents warrants issuable upon the exercise of warrants to purchase ordinary shares at an exercise price of $9.64 per share, which were granted onDecember 31, 2015 to Kreos Capital V (Expert) Fund Limited, or Kreos, in connection with a loan made by Kreos to us and are currently exercisable (inwhole or in part) until the earlier of (i) December 30, 2025 or (ii) immediately prior to the consummation of a merger, consolidation, or reorganization of uswith or into, or the sale or license of all or substantially all the assets or shares of us to, any other entity or person, other than a wholly-owned subsidiary of us,excluding any transaction in which our shareholders prior to the transaction will hold more than 50% of the voting and economic rights of the survivingentity after the transaction. None of these warrants had been exercised as of December 31, 2016.(3) Represents warrants issued as part of our follow-on offering in November 2016.(4) Represents warrants in the amount of 47,717 ordinary shares were issued as part of the $8.0 million drawdown under the Loan Agreement which occurredon December 28, 2016. See footnote 2 for exercisability terms. g.Share-based compensation expense for employees and non-employees:The Company recognized non-cash share-based compensation expense in the consolidated statements of operations as follows: Year Ended December 31, 2016 2015 2014Cost of revenues$108 $64 $33Research and development, net559 425 4,364Sales and marketing, net811 571 275General and administrative1,920 1,285 507 Total$3,398 $2,345 $5,179F-27REWALK ROBOTICS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIESNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOTE 9:- RESEARCH COLLABORATION AGREEMENT AND LICENSE AGREEMENTOn May 16, 2016, the Company entered into the “Collaboration Agreement” and License Agreement with Harvard.Under the Collaboration Agreement, Harvard and the Company have agreed to collaborate on research regarding the development of lightweight“soft suit” exoskeleton system technologies for lower limb disabilities, which are intended to treat stroke, multiple sclerosis, mobility limitations for theelderly and other medical applications. The Company has committed to pay in quarterly installments for the funding of this research, subject to a minimumfunding commitment under applicable circumstances. The Collaboration Agreement will expire on May 16, 2021.Under the License Agreement, Harvard has granted the Company an exclusive, worldwide royalty-bearing license under certain patents of Harvardrelating to lightweight “soft suit” exoskeleton system technologies for lower limb disabilities, a royalty-free license under certain related know-how and theoption to obtain a license under certain inventions conceived under the joint research collaboration.The License Agreement requires the Company to pay Harvard an upfront fee, reimbursements for expenses that Harvard incurred in connection withthe licensed patents, royalties on net sales and several milestone payments contingent upon the achievement of certain product development andcommercialization milestones. The License Agreement will continue in full force and effect until the expiration of the last-to-expire valid claim of thelicensed patents. As of December 31, 2016 the Company did not achieve any of these milestones, and given the early stage of the License Agreement, theCompany cannot anticipate the likelihood that the milestones will be achieved. Moreover, since such royalties are dependent on future product sales whichare neither determinable nor reasonably estimable, these royalty payments are not recorded on the Company's consolidated financial statements as ofDecember 31, 2016.The Company's total payment obligation under the Collaboration Agreement and of the License Agreement is $6.3 million, some of which is subjectto a minimum funding commitment under applicable circumstances as indicated above.The Company has recorded expense in the amount of $1.7 million which is part of the total payment obligation indicated above, as research anddevelopment expenses related to the License Agreement and to the Collaboration Agreement for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.NOTE 10:- INCOME TAXES The Company’s subsidiaries are separately taxed under the domestic tax laws of the jurisdiction of incorporation of each entity.a.Corporate tax rates in Israel:Presented hereunder are the tax rates relevant to the Company in the years 2014-2016:The Israeli statutory corporate tax rate was 26.5% in 2015 and 2014, On January 4, 2016, the statutory tax rate was changed to 25% following areduction of corporate tax by the government.In December 2016, the Israeli Parliament approved the Economic Efficiency Law (Legislative Amendments for Applying the EconomicPolicy for the 2017 and 2018 Budget Years), 2016 which reduces the corporate income tax rate to 24% (instead of 25%) effective from January 1,2017 and to 23% effective from January 1, 2018.b.Loss before taxes on income is comprised as follows: Year Ended December 31, 2016 2015 2014Domestic$(32,642) $(25,485) $(21,743)Foreign142 123 120 $(32,500) $(25,362) $(21,623)c.Taxes on income are comprised as follows: F-28REWALK ROBOTICS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIESNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Year Ended December 31, 2016 2015 2014Current$8 $114 $76Deferred(5) (61) (60)Prior year taxes— — 29 $3 $53 $45 Year Ended December 31, 2016 2015 2014Domestic$— $— $—Foreign3 53 45 $3 $53 $45 d.Deferred income taxes:Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financialreporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. The Company’s deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 are derivedfrom temporary differences.In assessing the realization of deferred tax assets, the Company considers whether it is more likely than not that all or some portion of thedeferred tax assets will not be realized. Based on the Company’s history of losses, the Company established a full valuation allowance for RRL.Undistributed earnings of certain subsidiaries as of December 31, 2016 were immaterial. The Company intends to reinvest these earningsindefinitely in the foreign subsidiaries. As a result, the Company has not provided for any deferred income taxes. December 31, 2016 2015Carry forward tax losses$20,938 $14,961Research and development carry forward expenses-temporary differences1,551 1,176Accrual and reserves223 206 Deferred tax assets before valuation allowance22,712 16,343Valuation allowance(22,560) (16,196) Net deferred tax assets$152 $147The net changes in the total valuation allowance for each of the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, are comprised as follows: Year Ended December 31, 2016 2015 2014Balance at beginning of year$(16,196) $(10,089) $(6,219)Changes due to amendments to tax laws and exchange rate differences917 — —Additions during the year(7,281) (6,107) (3,870)Balance at end of year$(22,560) $(16,196) $(10,089)F-29REWALK ROBOTICS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIESNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS e.Reconciliation of the theoretical tax expenses:A reconciliation between the theoretical tax expense, assuming all income is taxed at the statutory tax rate applicable to income of theCompany, and the actual tax expense (benefit) as reported in the consolidated statements of operations is as follows: Year Ended December 31, 2016 2015 2014Loss before taxes, as reported in the consolidated statements of operations$(32,500) $(25,362) $(21,623) Statutory tax rate25.0% 26.5% 26.5% Theoretical tax benefits on the above amount at the Israeli statutory tax rate$(8,125) $(6,721) $(5,730)Income tax at rate other than the Israeli statutory tax rate10 16 12Non-deductible expenses including equity based compensation expenses and other857 651 1,864Operating losses and other temporary differences for which valuation allowance wasprovided7,281 6,107 3,870Other(20) — —Taxes in respect of prior years— — 29 Actual tax expense$3 $53 $45 f.Foreign tax rates:Taxable income of RRI was subject to tax at the rate of 40% in 2016, 2015, and 2014. Taxable income of RRG was subject to tax at the rate of 30% in 2016, 2015, and 2014. g.Tax benefits under the Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments, 1959 (the “Investment Law”):Conditions for entitlement to the benefits:Under the Investment Law, in 2012 the Company elected “Beneficiary Enterprise” status which provides certain benefits, including taxexemptions and reduced tax rates. Income not eligible for Beneficiary Enterprise benefits is taxed at a regular rate.Income derived from Beneficiary Enterprise from productive activity will be exempt from tax for ten years from the year in which theCompany first has taxable income, providing that 12 years have not passed from the beginning of the year of election. In the event of a dividenddistribution from income that is exempt from company tax, as aforementioned, the Company will be required to pay tax of 10%- 25% on thatincome.In the event of distribution of dividends from the said tax-exempt income, the amount distributed will be subject to corporate tax at the rateordinarily applicable to the Beneficiary Enterprise’s income. Tax-exempt income generated under the Company’s “Beneficiary Enterprise” programwill be subject to taxes upon dividend distribution or complete liquidation.The entitlement to the above benefits is conditional upon the Company’s fulfilling the conditions stipulated by the Law and regulationspublished thereunder.F-30REWALK ROBOTICS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIESNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS On December 29, 2010, the Knesset approved an additional amendment to the Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments, 1959.According to the amendment, a reduced uniform corporate tax rate for exporting industrial enterprises (over 25%) was established. The reduced taxrate will not be program dependent and will apply to the industrial enterprise’s entire income. The tax rates for industrial enterprises have beenreduced. In August 2013, the Israeli Knesset approved an amendment to the Investment Law, pursuant to which the rates for development area A willbe 9% and for the rest of the country- 16% in 2014 and thereafter. The Amendment also prescribes that any dividends distributed to individuals orforeign residents from a preferred enterprise's earnings as above will be subject to taxes at a rate of 20% (subject to tax treaty benefits)In December 2016, the Economic Efficiency Law (Legislative Amendments for Applying the Economic Policy for the 2017 and 2018Budget Years), 2016 which includes Amendment 73 to the Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments ("the Amendment") was published.According to the Amendment, a preferred enterprise located in development area A will be subject to a tax rate of 7.5% instead of 9% effective fromJanuary 1, 2017 (and thereafter the tax rate applicable to preferred enterprises located in other areas remains at 16%).The Company has examined the effect of the adoption of the Amendment on its financial statements, and as of the date of the publication ofthe financial statements, the Company estimates that it will not apply the Amendment. The Company’s estimate may change in the future.h.Tax assessments:RRL has had final tax assessments up to and including the 2012 tax year.Each RRI and RRG have not had final tax assessment, since its inception. i.Net operating carry-forward losses for tax purposes: As of December 31, 2016, RRL has carry-forward losses amounting to approximately $83.8 million, which can be carried forward for anindefinite period.F-31REWALK ROBOTICS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIESNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOTE 11:- FINANCIAL EXPENSES, NET The components of financial expenses, net were as follows: Year Ended December 31, 2016 2015 2014Foreign currency transactions and other$85 $170 $200Financial expenses related to loan agreement with Kreos1,976 — 100Bank commissions34 36 36Expenses (income) related to hedging transactions(36) (18) 61Issuance of warrants to purchase convertible preferred share— — 835Revaluation of fair value of warrants to purchase convertible preferred share— — (776)Issuance of convertible preferred shares— — 1,114Issuance cost related to warrants liability— — 128 $2,059 $188 $1,698F-32REWALK ROBOTICS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIESNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOTE 12:- GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION AND MAJOR CUSTOMER AND PRODUCT DATA Summary information about geographic areas:ASC 280, “Segment Reporting” establishes standards for reporting information about operating segments. Operating segments are defined ascomponents of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker indeciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Company manages its business on the basis of one reportable segment, and derivesrevenues from selling systems and services (see Note 1 for a brief description of the Company’s business). The following is a summary of revenues withingeographic areas: Year Ended December 31, 2016 2015 2014Revenues based on customer’s location: Israel$— $— $—United States3,741 2,439 2,186Europe1,144 820 1,254Asia-Pacific984 487 511 Total revenues$5,869 $3,746 $3,951 December 31, 2016 2015Long-lived assets by geographic region: Israel$476 $605United States565 483Germany217 240 $1,258 $1,328 (*) Long-lived assets are comprised of property and equipment, net. Major customer data as a percentage of total revenues: Year Ended December 31, 2016 2015 2014Customer A33.3% 14.8% 15.1% F-33REWALK ROBOTICS LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIESNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOTE 13:- SUBSEQUENT EVENTSa. On January 9, 2017, the Company has announced its plan to reduce total operating expenses in 2017 by up to 30% as compared to 2016. Thesereductions will be achieved through a combination of targeted savings, including the completion of specific projects focused on quality improvementinitiatives and efforts to reduce overall product cost, a realignment of and reduction in staffing to match the Company’s 2017 business goals, and a reductionin other corporate spending. b. See note 7e for information on developments in legal proceedings in 2017..F-34Israeli Non-employee director option REWALK ROBOTICS LTD.2014 INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLANNotice of Option Grant - Section 102 Capital Gain OptionParticipant:[________]Company:ReWalk Robotics Ltd.Notice:You have been granted the following Capital Gain Stock Option to purchase Shares in accordance with the terms of the Plan (the "Option"),this Notice of Option Grant and the Capital Gain Stock Option Award Agreement attached hereto as Schedule A (this Notice of OptionGrant, together with the Capital Gain Stock Option Award Agreement, this “Agreement”).Type of Award:Capital Gain Stock Option under Section 102(b)(2) of the Israeli tax OrdinancePlan:ReWalk Robotics Ltd. 2014 Incentive Compensation PlanGrant:Date of Grant: [_________]Option Price per Share: [_________]Total Number of Shares Under Option:[_________]Exercisability:Subject to the terms of the Plan and this Agreement, you may exercise your Option on and after the dates set forth below in the VestingSchedule as to that percentage of the Total Number of Shares under the Option as set forth below opposite each such date. You mayexercise your Option to purchase any Shares as to which your Option has become exercisable at any time and from time to time until yourOption terminates or expires.Vesting Schedule:DateNumber[_________][_________][_________][_________][_________][_________][_________][_________]Total[_________]Special Terms:1Expiration Date:Ten years from the Date of Grant, subject to earlier termination as set forth in the Plan and this Agreement.Acknowledgementand Agreement:The undersigned Participant acknowledges receipt of, and understands and agrees to, the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the TrustDeed and the Plan, and declares that he or she is familiar with the provisions of Section 102 and the Capital Gains Route. The Participanthereby undertakes not to sell or transfer the Option and /or the underlying Shares prior to the lapse of the Trust Period (as defined below),unless he or she pays all taxes, which may arise in connection with such sale and/or transfer.PARTICIPANTName: [________]Date: [________]REWALK ROBOTICS LTD.Larry JasinskyChief Executive Officer[________________]Date of signature:[________________]Attached:Schedule A - Capital Gain Stock Option Award AgreementSchedule B - Trust Deed2Capital Gain Stock Option Award Agreement - Schedule AREWALK ROBOTICS LTD.2014 INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLANCapital Gain Stock Option Award AgreementUnder Section 102(b)(2) of the Israeli Income Tax Ordinance [New Version], 1961This Capital Gain Stock Option Award Agreement, dated as of the Date of Grant set forth in the Notice of Option Grant (the “GrantNotice”) to which this Capital Gain Stock Option Award Agreement is attached as Schedule A, is made between ReWalk Robotics Ltd. (the “Company”) and the Participant set forth inthe Grant Notice. The Grant Notice is included in and made part of this Agreement.1.Definitions. Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Agreement have the meanings set forth in the Plan.2.Grant of the Option. Subject to the provisions of this Agreement and the provisions of the Plan, the Company hereby grants to the Participant, pursuant to thePlan, the right and option (the “Option”) to purchase all or any part of the number of ordinary shares of the Company, par value NIS 0.01 each (“Shares”), set forth in the GrantNotice at the Option Price per Share (“Option Price”) set forth in the Grant Notice and on the other terms as set forth in the Grant Notice. The Option will be deposited with a trusteeapproved by the Israeli Tax Authority for this purpose (the “Trustee”), who will hold it in trust on Participant's behalf, all as set forth in Section 6 below.3.Exercisability of the Option. The Option shall become exercisable in accordance with the exercisability schedule and other terms set forth in the Grant Notice.The Option shall terminate on the Expiration Date set forth in the Grant Notice, subject to earlier termination as set forth in the Plan and this Agreement.4.Method of Exercise of the Option.(a)The Participant may exercise the Option, to the extent then exercisable, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Plan by delivering awritten or electronic notice to the Company in a form specified or accepted by the Company, specifying the number of Shares with respect to which the Option is being exercised andpayment to the Company of the aggregate Option Price in accordance with Section 4(b) hereof. Such notice must be signed by the Participant or any other person then having the rightto exercise the Option.(b)At the time the Participant exercises the Option, the Participant shall pay the Option Price of the Shares as to which the Option is being exercised tothe Company (i) in United States dollars by personal check, bank draft, money order or wire transfer of immediately available funds; or (ii) if permitted by the Committee, and subjectto any such terms, conditions and limitations as the Committee may prescribe and to the extent permitted by applicable law, by any other payment method described in Section 6.6 ofthe Plan.(c)The Company’s obligation to deliver the Shares to which the Participant is entitled upon exercise of the Option is conditioned on the Participant ’ssatisfaction in full to the Company of the aggregate Option Price of those Shares. Following the exercise of the Options, the underlying Shares shall be deposited with the Trustee asprovided below.5.Section 102 of the Income Tax Ordinance and its Rules.This Agreement is subject to the provisions of Section 102 of the Israeli Income Tax Ordinance [New version], 1961 (the “Ordinance” and “Section 102”, respectively), aswell as the Income Tax Rules (Tax Relief in Issuance of Shares to Employees), 2003 (the “102 Rules”), promulgated thereunder. Accordingly, the Company elected the Capital GainsTax Route in Section 102(b)(2) of the Ordinance (the “Capital Gains Route”) for the purpose of the taxation of Participant's income from the Option and underlying Shares. Ingeneral, taxable income that should be attributed to the Participant as a result of the grant of the Option and realization of the underlying Shares will be tax-free on the date of grant,but will be taxed on the sale of Shares issued upon exercise of the Option (“Exercised Shares”) or transfer of Exercised Shares from the Trustee (a “Transfer”). In accordance with theCapital Gains Route, if the Option or the Exercised Shares are held in trust by the Trustee for the applicable period of time (see Section 6 below), currently two years from the date thisletter is deposited with a trustee (the “Trust Period”), gains derived from the sale of Exercised Shares shall be classified as capital gains and taxed at a rate of only 25%; except for thebenefit afforded to the Participant on the date of grant, which shall be taxed (on the date of sale or Transfer of the Exercised Shares) as a ordinary income and shall be subject to tax atmarginal tax rates (up to 50% in 2015, including 2% "High Income Tax") plus social security and national health insurance payments (with respect to Shares of public companiesonly).At the time of sale of the Exercised Shares or a Transfer, the Participant shall be subject to tax, which will be calculated, in general, according to difference between (a) themarket price (or the actual sale price) of the Exercised Shares at such time, and (b) the Option Price Per Share. Such tax shall be withheld at source by the Company, in accordance withthe provisions of the 102 Rules, and the Transfer of Exercised Shares to the Participant is conditioned upon the payment of such tax.The Participant shall not be entitled to sell the Exercised Shares or to execute a Transfer, prior to the lapse of the Trust Period. Furthermore, any and all rights issued inrespect of the Exercised Shares, including bonus shares but excluding cash dividends (“Rights”(, shall be deposited with the Trustee and held thereby until the lapse of the TrustPeriod, and such Rights shall be subject to the Capital Gains Route. Notwithstanding the aforesaid, the Participant may sell Exercised Shares or Rights or execute a Transfer prior to thelapse of the Trust Period, provided, however, that tax is withheld at source by the Company in accordance with the 102 Rules. In such case, the Participant's gains shall be classified asordinary income and he or she, shall be subject to tax on such income at marginal tax rates (up to 50% in 2015, including 2% "High Income Tax") plus social security and nationalhealth insurance payments.3PARTICIPANT IS ADVISED TO CONSULT WITH HIS/HER OWN TAX ADVISOR WITH RESPECT TO THE TAX CONSEQUENCES OF RECEIVING ANDEXERCISING HIS/HER OPTION OR OF DISPOSING HIS/HER OPTION OR SHARES.6.Trust.To secure performance of tax law requirements, the Option awarded to the Participant according to this Agreement will be held in trust by the Trustee that wasapproved for this purpose by the Israeli Tax Authority, who shall release the underlying Exercised Shares to the Participant only upon full compliance with the legal requirements andthe terms of the Plan. For this purpose, a Trust Deed was signed between the Company and the Trustee, a copy of which is attached hereto as Schedule B. The conditions of the TrustDeed apply to the Option; thus, the Participant is required to carefully read the provisions of the said Trust Deed.1. The above tax description is a general summary only and does not refer to expenses involved with the exercise of Option and sale of Exercised Shares or changes in the IsraeliConsumer Price Index, which may impact the final tax calculation.7.Change of Control. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, the Option shall be subject to the Change of Control provisions set forth in ArticleXIV of the Plan.8.Termination. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 6.8 of the Plan, upon the Participant’s Termination of Service for any reason other than by the Companyfor Cause, the Option shall terminate and cease to be exercisable on the date that is ninety (90) days after the date of the Participant’s Termination of Service. Upon a Termination ofService by the Company for Cause, the Option shall terminate and cease to be exercisable upon Termination.9.Transferability of the Option. The Option shall not be transferable otherwise than by will or the laws of descent and distribution, and is exercisable, during thelifetime of the Participant, only by the Participant; provided, however, that (a) the Option may be exercised after the Participant’s death by the beneficiary most recently named by theParticipant in a written designation thereof filed by the Participant with the Company in accordance with Article XII of the Plan[, and (b) the Committee may, in its discretion, permitthe Option to be transferred during the Participant’s lifetime subject to Article XII of the Plan]. No transfer of the Option by will or the laws of descent and distribution, or otherwise,shall be effective to bind the Company unless the Committee is furnished with (as applicable): (i) written notice thereof and with a copy of the will and/or such evidence as theCommittee may deem necessary to establish the validity of the transfer and (ii) an agreement by the transferee to comply with all the terms and conditions of the Option that are orwould have been applicable to the Participant and to be bound by the acknowledgements made by the Participant in connection with the grant of the Option.10.Taxes and Withholdings. At the time of Transfer or sale of Exercised Shares with respect of all or any part of the Option, the Participant shall pay to theCompany or an Affiliate in cash, or make other arrangements, in accordance with Article XVI of the Plan, for the satisfaction of, any taxes of any kind, and social security paymentsdue or potentially payable or required to be withheld with respect to such exercise or Shares.11.No Rights as a Shareholder. Neither the Participant nor any other person shall become the beneficial owner of the Shares subject to the Option, nor have anyrights to dividends or other rights as a shareholder with respect to any such Shares, until the Participant has actually received such Shares following the exercise of the Option inaccordance with the terms of the Plan and this Agreement.12.No Right to Continued Employment. Neither the Option nor any terms contained in this Agreement shall confer upon the Participant any rights or claimsexcept in accordance with the express provisions of the Plan and this Agreement, and shall not give the Participant any express or implied right to be retained in the employment orservice of the Company or any Affiliate for any period, or in any particular position or at any particular rate of compensation, nor restrict in any way the right of the Company or anyAffiliate, which right is hereby expressly reserved, to modify or terminate the Participant ’s employment or service at any time for any reason. The Participant acknowledges and agreesthat any right to exercise the Option is earned only by continuing as an employee of the Company or an Affiliate at the will of the Company or such Affiliate, or satisfaction of anyother applicable terms and conditions contained in the Plan and this Agreement, and not through the act of being hired, being granted the Option or acquiring Shares hereunder.13.The Plan. By accepting any benefit under this Agreement, the Participant and any person claiming under or through the Participant shall be conclusivelydeemed to have indicated his or her acceptance and ratification of, and consent to, all of the terms and conditions of the Plan and this Agreement and any action taken under the Planby the Board, the Committee or the Company, in any case in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Plan. This Agreement is subject to all the terms, provisions and conditionsof the Plan, which are incorporated herein by reference, and to such rules, policies and regulations as may from time to time be adopted by the Committee. In the event of any conflictbetween the provisions of the Plan and this Agreement, the provisions of the Plan shall control, and this Agreement shall be deemed to be modified accordingly. The Plan and theprospectus describing the Plan can be found [on the Company’s HR intranet]. A paper copy of the Plan and the prospectus shall be provided to the Participant upon the Participant’swritten request to the Company at the address set forth in Section 13 hereof.414.Compliance with Laws and Regulations.(a)The Option and the obligation of the Company to sell and deliver Shares hereunder shall be subject in all respects to: (i) all applicable Federal andstate laws, rules and regulations and (ii) any registration, qualification, approvals or other requirements imposed by any government or regulatory agency or body which theCommittee shall, in its discretion, determine to be necessary or applicable. Moreover, the Option may not be exercised if its exercise, or the receipt of Shares pursuant thereto, would becontrary to applicable law. If at any time the Company determines, in its discretion, that the listing, registration or qualification of Shares upon any national securities exchange orunder any state or Federal law, or the consent or approval of any governmental regulatory body, is necessary or desirable, the Company shall not be required to deliver any certificatesfor Shares to the Participant or any other person pursuant to this Agreement unless and until such listing, registration, qualification, consent or approval has been effected or obtained,or otherwise provided for, free of any conditions not acceptable to the Company.(b)It is intended that the Shares received upon the exercise of the Option shall have been registered under the Securities Act. If the Participant is an“affiliate” of the Company, as that term is defined in Rule 144 under the Securities Act (“Rule 144”), the Participant may not sell the Shares received except in compliance with Rule144. Any certificates representing Shares issued to an “affiliate” of the Company may bear a legend setting forth such restrictions on the disposition or transfer of the Shares as theCompany deems appropriate to comply with Federal and state securities laws.(c)If at the time of exercise of all or part of the Option, the Shares are not registered under the Securities Act, and/or there is no current prospectus ineffect under the Securities Act with respect to the Shares, the Participant shall execute, prior to the delivery of any Shares to the Participant by the Company pursuant to this Agreement,an agreement (in such form as the Company may specify) in which the Participant represents and warrants that the Participant is purchasing or acquiring the shares acquired under thisAgreement for the Participant's own account, for investment only and not with a view to the resale or distribution thereof, and represents and agrees that any subsequent offer for saleor distribution of any kind of such Shares shall be made only pursuant to either (i) a registration statement on an appropriate form under the Securities Act, which registration statementhas become effective and is current with regard to the Shares being offered or sold or (ii) a specific exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act, but in claimingsuch exemption the Participant shall, prior to any offer for sale of such Shares, obtain a prior favorable written opinion, in form and substance satisfactory to the Company, fromcounsel for or approved by the Company, as to the applicability of such exemption thereto.15.Notices. All notices by the Participant or the Participant’s successors or permitted assigns shall be addressed to ReWalk Robotics Ltd., Hatnufa 3 st., Floor 6,P.O. Box 161, Yokneam 2069203 Israel, Attention: [Chief Financial Officer], or such other address as the Company may from time to time specify. All notices to the Participant shallbe addressed to the Participant at the Participant’s address in the Company's records.16.Other Plans. The Participant acknowledges that the grant of the Option shall not affect the Participant’s participation in, or benefits under, any other benefitplan or other contract or arrangement maintained by the Company or any Affiliate.5PARTICIPANTName: [________]Date: [________]REWALK ROBOTICS LTD.Larry JasinskyChief Executive Officer[________]Date of signature: [________]6Non- Israeli Non-employee director optionREWALK ROBOTICS LTD.2014 INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLANNotice of Option GrantParticipant:[________]Company:ReWalk Robotics Ltd.Notice:You have been granted the following Nonqualified Stock Option to purchase Shares in accordance with the terms of the Plan, this Noticeof Option Grant and the Nonqualified Stock Option Award Agreement attached hereto as Schedule A (this Notice of Option Grant,together with the Nonqualified Stock Option Award Agreement, this “Agreement”).Type of Award:Nonqualified Stock OptionPlan:ReWalk Robotics Ltd. 2014 Incentive Compensation PlanGrant:Date of Grant: [________]Option Price per Share: [________]Total Number of Shares Under Option: [________]Exercisability:Subject to the terms of the Plan and this Agreement, you may exercise your Option on and after the dates set forth below in the VestingSchedule as to that percentage of the Total Number of Shares Under Option set forth below opposite each such date. You may exerciseyour Option to purchase any Shares as to which your Option has become exercisable at any time and from time to time until your Optionterminates or expires.Vesting Schedule:DateNumber[________][________][________][________][________][________][________][________]Total[________]Special Terms:Expiration Date: Ten years from the Date of Grant, subject to earlier termination as set forth in thePlan and this Agreement.Acknowledgementand Agreement: The undersigned Participant acknowledges receipt of, and understands and agrees to, the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the Plan.PARTICIPANT Name: [________]Date: [________]REWALK ROBOTICS LTD. Larry JasinskyChief Executive OfficerDate of signature: [________]Nonqualified Stock Option Award Agreement - Schedule AREWALK ROBOTICS LTD.2014 INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLANNonqualified Stock Option Award AgreementThis Nonqualified Stock Option Award Agreement, dated as of the Date of Grant set forth in the Notice of Option Grant(the “Grant Notice”) to which this Nonqualified Stock Option Award Agreement is attached as Schedule A, is made between ReWalk Robotics Ltd. (the“Company”) and the Participant set forth in the Grant Notice. The Grant Notice is included in and made part of this Agreement.1.Definitions. Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Agreement have the meanings set forth in the Plan.2.Grant of the Option. Subject to the provisions of this Agreement and the provisions of the Plan, the Company hereby grants to theParticipant, pursuant to the Plan, the right and option (the “Option”) to purchase all or any part of the number of ordinary shares of the Company, par valueNIS 0.01 each (“Shares”), set forth in the Grant Notice at the Option Price per Share (“Option Price”) set forth in the Grant Notice and on the other terms as setforth in the Grant Notice.3.Exercisability of the Option. The Option shall become exercisable in accordance with the exercisability schedule and other terms set forthin the Grant Notice. The Option shall terminate on the Expiration Date set forth in the Grant Notice, subject to earlier termination as set forth in the Plan andthis Agreement.4.Method of Exercise of the Option.(a)The Participant may exercise the Option, to the extent then exercisable, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Planby delivering a written or electronic notice to the Company in a form specified or accepted by the Company, specifying the number of Shares with respect towhich the Option is being exercised and payment to the Company of the aggregate Option Price in accordance with Section 4(b) hereof. Such notice must besigned by the Participant or any other person then having the right to exercise the Option.(b)At the time the Participant exercises the Option, the Participant shall pay the Option Price of the Shares as to which the Optionis being exercised to the Company (i) in United States dollars by personal check, bank draft, money order or wire transfer of immediately available funds; or(ii) if permitted by the Committee, and subject to any such terms, conditions and limitations as the Committee may prescribe and to the extent permitted byapplicable law, by any other payment method described in Section 6.6 of the Plan.(c)The Company’s obligation to deliver the Shares to which the Participant is entitled upon exercise of the Option is conditionedon the Participant ’s satisfaction in full to the Company of the aggregate Option Price of those Shares and the required tax withholding related to suchexercise.5.Change of Control. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, the Option shall be subject to the Change of Controlprovisions set forth in Article XIV of the Plan.6.Termination. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 6.8 of the Plan, upon the Participant’s Termination of Service for any reasonother than by the Company for Cause, the Option shall terminate and cease to be exercisable on the date that is ninety (90) days after the date of theParticipant’s Termination of Service. Upon a Termination of Service by the Company for Cause, the Option shall terminate and cease to be exercisable uponTermination.7.Transferability of the Option. The Option shall not be transferable otherwise than by will or the laws of descent and distribution, and isexercisable, during the lifetime of the Participant, only by the Participant; provided, however, that (a) the Option may be exercised after the Participant’sdeath by the beneficiary most recently named by the Participant in a written designation thereof filed by the Participant with the Company in accordancewith Article XII of the Plan[, and (b) the Committee may, in its discretion, permit the Option to be transferred during the Participant ’s lifetime subject toArticle XII of the Plan]. No transfer of the Option by will or the laws of descent and distribution, or otherwise, shall be effective to bind the Company unlessthe Committee is furnished with (as applicable): (i) written notice thereof and with a copy of the will and/or such evidence as the Committee may deemnecessary to establish the validity of the transfer and (ii) an agreement by the transferee to comply with all the terms and conditions of the Option that are orwould have been applicable to the Participant and to be bound by the acknowledgements made by the Participant in connection with the grant of the Option.8.Taxes and Withholdings. At the time of receipt of Shares upon the exercise of all or any part of the Option, the Participant shall pay to theCompany or an Affiliate in cash, or make other arrangements, in accordance with Article XVI of the Plan, for the satisfaction of, any taxes of any kind, andsocial security payments due or potentially payable or required to be withheld with respect to such exercise or Shares.9.No Rights as a Shareholder. Neither the Participant nor any other person shall become the beneficial owner of the Shares subject to theOption, nor have any rights to dividends or other rights as a shareholder with respect to any such Shares, until the Participant has actually received suchShares following the exercise of the Option in accordance with the terms of the Plan and this Agreement.10.No Right to Continued Service. Neither the Option nor any terms contained in this Agreement shall confer upon the Participant anyrights or claims except in accordance with the express provisions of the Plan and this Agreement, and shall not give the Participant any express or impliedright to be retained in the service of the Company for any period, or in any particular position or at any particular rate of compensation, nor restrict in anyway the right of the Company, which right is hereby expressly reserved, to modify or terminate the Participant ’s service at any time for any reason. TheParticipant acknowledges and agrees that any right to exercise the Option is earned only by continuing in the service of the of the Company and satisfactionof any other applicable terms and conditions contained in the Plan and this Agreement, and not through the act of being retained as a director of theCompany or granted the Option or acquiring Shares hereunder.11.The Plan. By accepting any benefit under this Agreement, the Participant and any person claiming under or through the Participant shallbe conclusively deemed to have indicated his or her acceptance and ratification of, and consent to, all of the terms and conditions of the Plan and thisAgreement and any action taken under the Plan by the Board, the Committee or the Company, in any case in accordance with the terms and conditions of thePlan. This Agreement is subject to all the terms, provisions and conditions of the Plan, which are incorporated herein by reference, and to such rules, policiesand regulations as may from time to time be adopted by the Committee. In the event of any conflict between the provisions of the Plan and this Agreement,the provisions of the Plan shall control, and this Agreement shall be deemed to be modified accordingly. The Plan and the prospectus describing the Plan canbe found [on the Company’s HR intranet]. A paper copy of the Plan and the prospectus shall be provided to the Participant upon the Participant’s writtenrequest to the Company at the address set forth in Section 14 hereof.12.Compliance with Laws and Regulations.(a)The Option and the obligation of the Company to sell and deliver Shares hereunder shall be subject in all respects to: (i) allapplicable Federal and state laws, rules and regulations and (ii) any registration, qualification, approvals or other requirements imposed by any governmentor regulatory agency or body which the Committee shall, in its discretion, determine to be necessary or applicable. Moreover, the Option may not beexercised if its exercise, or the receipt of Shares pursuant thereto, would be contrary to applicable law. If at any time the Company determines, in itsdiscretion, that the listing, registration or qualification of Shares upon any national securities exchange or under any state or Federal law, or the consent orapproval of any governmental regulatory body, is necessary or desirable, the Company shall not be required to deliver any certificates for Shares to theParticipant or any other person pursuant to this Agreement unless and until such listing, registration, qualification, consent or approval has been effected orobtained, or otherwise provided for, free of any conditions not acceptable to the Company.(b)It is intended that the Shares received upon the exercise of the Option shall have been registered under the Securities Act. If theParticipant is an “affiliate” of the Company, as that term is defined in Rule 144 under the Securities Act (“Rule 144”), the Participant may not sell the Sharesreceived except in compliance with Rule 144. Any certificates representing Shares issued to an “affiliate” of the Company may bear a legend setting forthsuch restrictions on the disposition or transfer of the Shares as the Company deems appropriate to comply with Federal and state securities laws.(c)If at the time of exercise of all or part of the Option, the Shares are not registered under the Securities Act, and/or there is nocurrent prospectus in effect under the Securities Act with respect to the Shares, the Participant shall execute, prior to the delivery of any Shares to theParticipant by the Company pursuant to this Agreement, an agreement (in such form as the Company may specify) in which the Participant represents andwarrants that the Participant is purchasing or acquiring the shares acquired under this Agreement for the Participant's own account, for investment only andnot with a view to the resale or distribution thereof, and represents and agrees that any subsequent offer for sale or distribution of any kind of such Sharesshall be made only pursuant to either (i) a registration statement on an appropriate form under the Securities Act, which registration statement has becomeeffective and is current with regard to the Shares being offered or sold or (ii) a specific exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act, butin claiming such exemption the Participant shall, prior to any offer for sale of such Shares, obtain a prior favorable written opinion, in form and substancesatisfactory to the Company, from counsel for or approved by the Company, as to the applicability of such exemption thereto.13.Data Protection. By participating in the Plan, each Participant consents to the collection, processing, transmission and storage by theCompany or any Affiliate, in any form whatsoever, of any data of a professional or personal nature which is necessary for the purposes of administering thePlan. The Company may share such information with any Affiliate, any trustee, its registrars, brokers, other third-party administrator or any person whoobtains control of the Company or any Affiliate or any division respectively thereof.14.Notices. All notices by the Participant or the Participant’s successors or permitted assigns shall be addressed to ReWalk Robotics Ltd.,Hatnufa 3 st., Floor 6, P.O. Box 161, Yokneam 2069203 Israel, Attention: [Chief Financial Officer], or such other address as the Company may from time totime specify. All notices to the Participant shall be addressed to the Participant at the Participant’s address in the Company's records.15.Other Plans. The Participant acknowledges that any income derived from the exercise of the Option shall not affect the Participant’sparticipation in, or benefits under, any other benefit plan or other contract or arrangement maintained by the Company or any Affiliate.PARTICIPANTName: [________]Date: [________]REWALK ROBOTICS LTD.Larry JasinskyChief Executive OfficerDate of signature: [________]EXHIBIT 23.1CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-199688) pertaining to ReWalk RoboticsLtd. 2006 stock Option Plan, ReWalk Robotics Ltd. 2012 Equity Incentive Plan and ReWalk Robotics Ltd. 2014 IncentiveCompensation Plan and the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-209833) of our report dated February 17, 2017, withrespect to the consolidated financial statements of ReWalk Robotics Ltd. and its subsidiaries included in the annual report (Form 10-K)for the year ended December 31, 2016, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. /s/ Kost, Forer, Gabbay & KasiererKOST, FORER, GABBAY & KASIERERA Member of Ernst & Young Global Haifa, IsraelFebruary 17, 2017EXHIBIT 31.1CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TOEXCHANGE ACT RULE 13A-14(A)/15D-14(A)AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002I, Larry Jasinski, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of ReWalk Robotics Ltd. (the “registrant”);2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for theregistrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision,to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes inaccordance with generally accepted accounting principles; (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting. /s/ Larry Jasinski Larry Jasinski Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) Date: February 17, 2017EXHIBIT 31.2CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TOEXCHANGE ACT RULE 13A-14(A)/15D-14(A)AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002I, Kevin Hershberger, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of ReWalk Robotics Ltd. (the “registrant”);2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for theregistrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision,to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes inaccordance with generally accepted accounting principles; (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting. /s/ Kevin Hershberger Kevin Hershberger Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)Date: February 17, 2017 EXHIBIT 32.1CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002In connection with the Annual Report of ReWalk Robotics Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2016, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Larry Jasinski, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:•the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and•the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Larry Jasinski Larry Jasinski Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)Date: February 17, 2017A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.EXHIBIT 32.2CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002In connection with the Annual Report of ReWalk Robotics Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2016, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kevin Hershberger, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:•the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and•the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company /s/ Kevin Hershberger Kevin Hershberger Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)Date: February 17, 2017A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above