Rite Aid
Annual Report 2013

Plain-text annual report

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 (cid:1) ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FORM 10-K For The Fiscal Year Ended March 2, 2013 OR (cid:2) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For The Transition Period From To Commission File Number 1-5742 RITE AID CORPORATION (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) 30 Hunter Lane, Camp Hill, Pennsylvania (Address of principal executive offices) 23-1614034 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 17011 (Zip Code) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (717) 761-2633 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered Common Stock, $1.00 par value New York Stock Exchange Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes (cid:1) No (cid:2) Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to section 13 or section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes (cid:2) No (cid:1) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes (cid:1) No (cid:2) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes (cid:1) No (cid:2) Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. (cid:1) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of ‘‘Accelerated Filer’’ and ‘‘Large Accelerated Filer’’ in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Large Accelerated Filer (cid:1) Accelerated Filer (cid:2) Smaller reporting company (cid:2) Non-Accelerated Filer (cid:2) (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes (cid:2) No (cid:1) The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common stock of the registrant held by non-affiliates of the registrant based on the closing price at which such stock was sold on the New York Stock Exchange on September 1, 2012 was approximately $861,991,122. For purposes of this calculation, executive officers, directors and 5% shareholders are deemed to be affiliates of the registrant. As of April 11, 2013 the registrant had outstanding 904,564,621 shares of common stock, par value $1.00 per share. DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE Portions of the proxy statement for the registrant’s annual meeting of stockholders to be held on June 20, 2013 are incorporated by reference into Part III. TABLE OF CONTENTS Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PART I ITEM 1. ITEM 1A. ITEM 1B. ITEM 2. ITEM 3. ITEM 4. PART II Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Risk Factors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unresolved Staff Comments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Legal Proceedings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mine Safety Disclosures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ITEM 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Selected Financial Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Financial Statements and Supplementary Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Controls and Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Executive Compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence . . . . Principal Accountant Fees and Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ITEM 6. ITEM 7. ITEM 7A. ITEM 8. ITEM 9. ITEM 9A. ITEM 9B. PART III ITEM 10. ITEM 11. ITEM 12. ITEM 13. ITEM 14. PART IV Page 2 3 11 19 19 21 23 23 24 26 45 46 46 46 49 ITEM 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 SIGNATURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115 1 CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS This report, as well as our other public filings or public statements, include forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward- looking statements are often identified by terms and phrases such as ‘‘anticipate,’’ ‘‘believe,’’ ‘‘intend,’’ ‘‘estimate,’’ ‘‘expect,’’ ‘‘continue,’’ ‘‘should,’’ ‘‘could,’’ ‘‘may,’’ ‘‘plan,’’ ‘‘project,’’ ‘‘predict,’’ ‘‘will’’ and similar expressions and include references to assumptions and relate to our future prospects, developments and business strategies. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to: (cid:127) our high level of indebtedness; (cid:127) our ability to make interest and principal payments on our debt and satisfy the other covenants contained in our senior secured credit facility and other debt agreements; (cid:127) general economic conditions (including the impact of continued high unemployment and changing consumer behavior), inflation and interest rate movements; (cid:127) our ability to improve the operating performance of our stores in accordance with our long term strategy; (cid:127) our ability to maintain or grow prescription count and realize front-end sales growth; (cid:127) our ability to retain the business we have gained as a result of the Walgreens / Express Scripts dispute which was settled in September 2012; (cid:127) our ability to hire and retain qualified personnel; (cid:127) the continued efforts of private and public third party payors to reduce prescription drug reimbursement and encourage mail order and limit access to payor networks; (cid:127) competitive pricing pressures, including aggressive promotional activity from our competitors; (cid:127) decisions to close additional stores and distribution centers or undertake additional refinancing activities, which could result in further charges to our operating statement; (cid:127) our ability to manage expenses and our investment in working capital; (cid:127) continued consolidation of the drugstore and the pharmacy benefit management industries; (cid:127) changes in state or federal legislation or regulations, and the continued impact from the ongoing implementation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act as well as other healthcare reform; (cid:127) the outcome of lawsuits and governmental investigations; (cid:127) our ability to maintain the listing of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange (the ‘‘NYSE’’), and the resulting impact on our indebtedness, results of operations and financial condition; and (cid:127) other risks and uncertainties described from time to time in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ‘‘SEC’’). We undertake no obligation to update or revise the forward-looking statements included in this report, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, after the date of this report. Our actual results, performance or achievements could differ materially from the results expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences are discussed in the sections entitled ‘‘Risk Factors’’ and ‘‘Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Overview and Factors Affecting Our Future Prospects’’ included in this annual report on Form 10-K. 2 Item 1. Business Overview PART I Rite Aid is the third largest retail drugstore chain in the United States based on both revenues and number of stores. As of March 2, 2013, we operated 4,623 stores in 31 states across the country and in the District of Columbia. In our stores, we sell prescription drugs and a wide assortment of other merchandise, which we call ‘‘front-end’’ products. In fiscal 2013, prescription drug sales accounted for 67.6% of our total sales. We believe that pharmacy operations will continue to represent a significant part of our business due to favorable industry trends, including an aging population, increased life expectancy, anticipated growth in the federally funded Medicare Part D prescription program as ‘‘baby boomers’’ start to enroll, expanded coverage for uninsured Americans as the result of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the discovery of new and better drug therapies. We carry a full assortment of front-end products, which accounted for the remaining 32.4% of our total sales in fiscal 2013. Front-end products include over-the-counter medications, health and beauty aids, personal care items, cosmetics, household items, food and beverages, greeting cards, seasonal merchandise and numerous other everyday and convenience products. We also offer various photo processing services in virtually all our stores. We attempt to distinguish our stores from other national chain drugstores, in part, through our wellness + loyalty program, our Wellness format stores, private brands and our strategic alliance with GNC, a leading retailer of vitamin and mineral supplements. We offer a wide variety of products under our private brands, which are well received by our customers and contributed approximately 18.3% and 17.0% of our front-end sales in the categories where private brand products were offered in fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2012, respectively. The overall average size of each store in our chain is approximately 12,600 square feet. The average size of our stores is larger in the western United States. As of March 2, 2013, 61% of our stores were freestanding; 52% of our stores included a drive-thru pharmacy; and 47% included a GNC store within Rite Aid store. Our headquarters are located at 30 Hunter Lane, Camp Hill, Pennsylvania 17011, and our telephone number is (717) 761-2633. Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the trading symbol of ‘‘RAD.’’ We were incorporated in 1968 and are a Delaware corporation. Industry Trends The rate of pharmacy sales growth in the United States has slowed in recent years, driven by a decline in new blockbuster drugs, a longer FDA approval process, drug safety concerns, higher copays, the loss of individual health insurance with the rise of unemployment and an increase in the use of generic (non-brand name) drugs, which are less expensive but generate higher gross margins. However, we expect prescription usage to grow in the coming years due to the aging U.S. population, increased life expectancy, ‘‘baby boomers’’ becoming eligible for the federally funded Medicare prescription program and new drug therapies. Furthermore, we expect that the estimated additional 27 million people who will be covered by health insurance in 2014, as well as the closing of the ‘‘donut hole’’ in Medicare Part D, will have a positive impact on our business. Additionally, recent advances in technology are allowing patients to seek medical advice and receive diagnostic counseling in a virtual environment, shifting certain healthcare services away from the traditional doctor’s office into virtual clinics, providing additional opportunities for our retail pharmacy operations to better serve our customers. 3 Generic prescription drugs help lower overall costs for customers and third party payors. We believe the utilization of existing generic pharmaceuticals will continue to increase. A significant number of new generics became available during 2012, which contributed to our substantially improved fiscal 2013 results. Generic introductions are expected to slow down for fiscal 2014, with the next significant wave of generic introductions coming in fiscal 2015 as additional popular branded drugs are scheduled to lose patent protection. The gross profit from a generic drug prescription in the retail drugstore industry is generally greater than the gross profit from a brand drug prescription. However, the sale amount can be substantially less. The retail drugstore industry is highly competitive and has been experiencing consolidation. We believe that the continued consolidation of the drugstore industry, continued new store openings, increased competition from internet and mail order based providers and aggressive generic pricing programs at competitors such as Wal-Mart and various supermarket chains will further increase competitive pressures in the industry. The pharmacy business has continued to be highly promotional, which contributes to additional competitive pressures. The retail drugstore industry relies significantly on third party payors. Third party payors, including the Medicare Part D plans and the state sponsored Medicaid and related managed care Medicaid agencies, at times change the eligibility requirements of participants or reduce certain reimbursement rates. These changes and reductions are expected to continue. When third party payors, including the Medicare Part D program and state sponsored Medicaid agencies, reduce the number of participants and/or reduce their reimbursement rates, sales and margins in the industry could be reduced, and profitability of the industry adversely affected. These possible adverse effects can be partially or entirely offset by lowering our product cost, controlling expenses, dispensing more higher margin generics and dispensing more prescriptions overall. Strategy Our strategy for fiscal 2014 is to continue the transformation of Rite Aid into a neighborhood destination for health and wellness. This strategic objective will not only allow us to better meet the needs of our customers and patients in a rapidly changing healthcare environment, but will also help us to continue the positive financial momentum we have generated over the past several years. Financially, our primary goal for fiscal 2014, consistent with fiscal 2013, is to continue growing same stores sales while expanding EBITDA margins, both of which are critical to achieving long-term financial success. By growing same-store sales, we can take full advantage of our recent cost control improvements as well as margin benefits resulting from the wave of new generic medications introduced in fiscal 2013. In order to drive our financial performance and sustainable sales growth, we will continue to increase the level of capital investment in our store base through initiatives such as the Wellness store remodel program and prescription file purchases. We will also continue to build upon key initiatives we have introduced in recent years such as our highly successful wellness+ customer loyalty program and expanded pharmacy services, including immunizations. At the same time, we will focus on developing new programs that meet the evolving needs of our customers as we enter a period of rapid change in the U.S. healthcare industry. We expect that these continued investments and our focus on key initiatives will generate long-term value for our shareholders. Below are descriptions of our key initiatives: wellness+—Since its launch in April of 2010, our free wellness+ program has provided customers and patients with the opportunity to earn significant discounts and wellness rewards in return for being loyal Rite Aid shoppers. Enrolled members earn rewards based on the accumulation of points for certain front-end and prescription purchases. The program has been well received by Rite Aid 4 customers and continues to provide significant value to members earning enough points to reach the Gold, Silver or Bronze tier levels. In addition to tiered discounts and wellness rewards, members receive exclusive sale pricing and the opportunity to earn Plus Up Rewards, which are offers on certain items featured in our weekly circular that provide additional savings during return shopping trips. Both participation in the program and wellness+ card usage continue to be strong. As of April 2013, the wellness+ program had over 25 million active members, defined as members who have used their wellness+ card at least twice over the previous 26 weeks. At the end of our fiscal year, wellness+ members accounted for 79% of front-end sales and 68% of prescriptions filled. Members continue to have higher basket sizes than non-members and also have a much higher rate of prescription retention. In addition, our number of Gold and Silver members—Rite Aid’s most valuable and satisfied customers—continues to increase. We believe that the wellness+ program has contributed to the improvements in our front-end same store sales and same store prescription count. We plan on making additional incremental investments in wellness+ in fiscal 2014, as we expect more customers to move into the Gold, Silver and Bronze tiers. We also intend to expand wellness + in fiscal 2014 and leverage our spend data through the use of advanced customer analytics. Private Brands—In fiscal 2011, we began to roll out our new private brand architecture, which included the consolidation of our private brands into three separate tiers. The initiative included enhanced package designs for our private brand items and the introduction of our price-fighter brand, Simplify. We now have approximately 3,000 private brand items and our private brand penetration has increased from 16% in fiscal 2011 to 18.3% as of the end of fiscal 2013. This rollout has been completed and we now have approximately 3,000 items in these brands. In fiscal 2014, we will continue to aggressively promote our private brands, which offer great value to our customers and strong margins for Rite Aid, through specific promotional programs and the introduction of new seasonal categories. Enhanced Digital Offerings—As we continue working hard to improve the customer experience in our 4,600 stores, we’re also focused on providing enhanced digital resources that better reflect our brand of health and wellness. As a result, in March we introduced our new and improved riteaid.com website, which provides easier navigation, a more personalized web experience and enhanced e-commerce. We are also releasing quarterly updates for our mobile app and have plans to introduce apps for the iPad and Passbook. Wellness Store Remodels—In fiscal 2013, we continued to strengthen Rite Aid as a wellness destination by converting more than 500 stores to our Wellness format, which brought our chain-wide total to nearly 800 by the end of the fiscal year. In addition to improved interior design, expanded clinical pharmacy services and new wellness product offerings, these stores are staffed with our unique Wellness Ambassadors, who serve as a bridge from the front-end of our stores to the pharmacy and provide an added level of customer service. Our customers have responded favorably to this unique store format as front-end sales trends in these stores have been above the chain average. Also in fiscal 2013, we introduced the latest iteration of our Wellness store format known as ‘‘Genuine Well-being.’’ These stores feature new interior design, additional wellness items and unique merchandising displays that bring technology to our stores so that our customers can make more informed purchase decisions. This latest Wellness store format demonstrates how we are focused on driving innovation in our stores so that we continue meeting the rapidly changing needs of our customers. We plan to complete an additional 400 Wellness remodels in Fiscal 2014. We believe these remodels are a cost-effective way to strengthen our store base, grow sales and offer our customers a unique and engaging wellness experience. 5 Expanded Healthcare Services—In fiscal 2013, we continued to expand the role of our Rite Aid pharmacists in delivering wellness services that go beyond simply filling prescriptions. A key area of focus has been our immunizations program, which has grown significantly in recent years. In fiscal 2013, pharmacists administered nearly 2.4 million flu shots compared to nearly 1.5 million the previous year, an increase of about 60%. We also increased the number of immunizations we administered for other disease states such as shingles, pneumonia and whooping cough. Continuing to expand the volume and types of immunizations that we can perform will be an area of focus for fiscal 2014. We also put greater emphasis on prescription compliance and adherence programs in fiscal 2013, including the roll out of the Rite Care Prescription Advisor. The Rite Care Prescription Advisor gives our pharmacists a tool for initiating one-on-one consultations with patients in order to explain the health benefits of taking medications as prescribed. Other key pharmacy services include our expanded efforts to provide Medication Therapy Management services to patients with complex medication therapies and specialized services to patients with diabetes. We are also introducing unique ways for customers and patients to conveniently access the healthcare services they need. In conjunction with Optum Health, we introduced Now Clinic Online Care services in fiscal 2012 to select Rite Aid pharmacies in the greater Detroit area. We have since expanded these clinics to select stores in Baltimore, Boston, Philadelphia and Pittsburgh. These virtual clinics provide patients with real-time online access to qualified medical care, information and resources from nurses and also physicians, who have the ability to diagnose and potentially write prescriptions for our patients. We will continue to grow and develop our pharmacy and healthcare-related service offerings to better meet the needs of consumers and strengthen our brand of health and wellness. Prescription File Purchases—In fiscal 2013, we increased the amount of capital allocated to the purchase of prescription files to $67.1 million, up from our $35.0 million investment in fiscal 2012. We plan to continue this level of spending on prescription file purchases in fiscal 2014, as they typically deliver a strong return on investment. Customer Service—We have put several store operations programs in place to improve the customer service experience, including our chain-wide emphasis on greeting our customers more frequently and assisting them with their purchases. Our emphasis on delivering an outstanding customer experience continues to pay off. According to the American Customer Satisfaction Index, independent and well-respected measure of customer satisfaction, our score increased by three percent this year, and we now hold the top position among the three major drugstore chains. We have also made investments in technology to make it easier for our store associates to perform necessary tasks such as price changes and backroom inventory management. By providing our associates with the ability to execute these tasks more efficiently, we give our store teams more time to focus on providing excellent service to our customers. During fiscal 2013, we increased funds allocated for training our store and field associates and strengthening their customer service skills. We plan to further increase our funding levels for training in fiscal 2014. We believe this additional focus on customer service has and will continue to help us drive our improved overall performance. Cost Control—We made significant reductions to our SG&A expense over the past few years through better control of store labor and other costs in the stores, consolidation of our distribution center network, a centralized indirect procurement function for all non-merchandise purchases and through initiatives aimed to simplify our processes in the stores and at our Corporate office. We will continue to focus on controlling costs in fiscal 2014 so that we can maximize the benefits of our sales and customer service initiatives and capital investments. 6 Products and Services Sales of prescription drugs represented approximately 67.6%, 68.1%, and 67.8% of our total sales in fiscal years 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. In fiscal years 2013, 2012 and 2011, prescription drug sales were $17.1 billion, $17.7 billion, and $17.0 billion, respectively. See ‘‘Item 7 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations’’ and our consolidated financial statements. We carry a full assortment of non-prescription, or front end products. The types and number of front end products in each store vary, and selections are based on customer needs and preferences and available space. No single front end product category contributed significantly to our sales during fiscal 2013. We also offer photo finishing services in a majority of our stores. Our principal classes of products in fiscal 2013 were the following: Product Class Prescription drugs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Over-the-counter medications and personal care . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Health and beauty aids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . General merchandise and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Percentage of Sales 67.6% 9.9% 5.2% 17.3% We offer a wide variety of products under our private brands, which contributed approximately 18.3% of our front end sales in the categories where private brand products were offered in fiscal 2013. We intend to increase the number of private brand products during fiscal 2014, many of which will be in our price fighter brand, Simplify. We believe that our customers find these products to be of high quality and provide great value. We have a strategic alliance with GNC under which we have opened over 2,100 GNC stores within Rite Aid store as of March 2, 2013 and have a contractual commitment to open additional stores by December 2014. We incorporate the GNC store within Rite Aid store concept into many of our new and relocated stores and into many of our Wellness remodels. GNC is a leading nationwide retailer of vitamin and mineral supplements, personal care, fitness and other health-related products. Technology All of our stores are integrated into a common information system, which enables our customers to fill or refill prescriptions in any of our stores throughout the country, reduces chances of adverse drug interactions, and enables our pharmacists to fill prescriptions more accurately and efficiently. This system can be expanded to accommodate new stores. Our customers may also order prescription refills over the Internet through our recently enhanced website, www.riteaid.com, or over the phone through our telephonic automated refill systems for pick up at a Rite Aid store. We have automated pharmacy dispensing units in high volume stores, which are linked to our pharmacists’ computers that fill and label prescription drug orders. The efficiency of these units allows our pharmacists to spend more time consulting with our customers. Additionally, each of our stores employs point-of-sale technology that supports sales analysis and recognition of customer trends. This same point-of-sale technology facilitates the maintenance of perpetual inventory records which, together with our sales analysis, drives our automated inventory replenishment process. We continue to embrace technology as a way to enhance the customer experience. We completed the development and implementation of our improved mobile app, which is now available for download for both the Android and iPhone platforms. This free app allows our customers to use their smartphones to order refills by scanning their prescription bottle, manage their wellness + account, access the weekly circular to view sale items, order photo prints and locate a nearby Rite Aid store 7 using GPS. We have continued to strengthen our presence on social media sites such as Facebook, Twitter and Pinterest through unique promotions and contests. Suppliers During fiscal 2013, we purchased brand pharmaceuticals and some generic pharmaceuticals, which amounted to approximately 88.7% of the dollar volume of our prescription drugs, from a single wholesaler, McKesson Corporation (‘‘McKesson’’), under a contract which runs through March 31, 2016. Under the contract, with limited exceptions, we are required to purchase all of our branded pharmaceutical products from McKesson. If our relationship with McKesson was disrupted, we could temporarily have difficulty filling prescriptions for brand-named drugs until we executed a replacement wholesaler agreement or developed and implemented self-distribution processes, which could negatively affect our business. We purchase most of our generic (non-brand name) pharmaceuticals directly from manufacturers which account for approximately 80.0% of our prescription volume. We believe the loss of any one generic supplier would not disrupt our ability to fill generic (non-brand name) prescriptions but could negatively impact our results. We purchase our non-pharmaceutical merchandise from numerous manufacturers and wholesalers. We believe that competitive sources are readily available for substantially all of the non-pharmaceutical merchandise we carry and that the loss of any one supplier would not have a material effect on our business. We sell private brand and co-branded products that generally are supplied by numerous competitive sources. The Rite Aid and GNC co-branded PharmAssure vitamin and mineral supplement products and the GNC branded vitamin and mineral supplement products that we sell in our stores are developed by GNC, and along with our Rite Aid brand vitamin and mineral supplements, are manufactured by GNC. Customers and Third Party Payors During fiscal 2013, our stores filled approximately 297 million prescriptions and served an average of 2.0 million customers per day. The loss of any one customer would not have a material adverse impact on our results of operations. In fiscal 2013, 96.6% of our pharmacy sales were to customers covered by third party payors (such as insurance companies, prescription benefit management companies, government agencies, private employers or other managed care providers) that agree to pay for all or a portion of a customer’s eligible prescription purchases based on negotiated and contracted reimbursement rates. During fiscal 2013, the top five third party payors accounted for approximately 71.7% of our pharmacy sales. The largest third party payor represented 35.3% of our pharmacy sales. During fiscal 2013, Medicaid and related managed care Medicaid payors sales were approximately 17.4% of our pharmacy sales, of which the largest single Medicaid payor was approximately 1.1% of our pharmacy sales. During fiscal 2013, approximately 30.0% of our pharmacy sales were to customers covered by Medicare Part D. Competition The retail drugstore industry is highly competitive. We compete with, among others, retail drugstore chains, independently owned drugstores, supermarkets, mass merchandisers, discount stores, dollar stores and mail order pharmacies. We compete on the basis of store location and convenient access, customer service, product selection and price. We believe continued consolidation of the drugstore industry, the aggressive discounting of generic drugs by supermarkets and mass merchandisers and the increase of promotional incentives to drive prescription sales will further increase competitive pressures in the industry. 8 Marketing and Advertising In fiscal 2013, marketing and advertising expense was approximately $335.8 million, which was spent primarily on weekly circular advertising. Our marketing and advertising activities centered primarily on the following: (cid:127) Product price promotions to draw customers to our stores; (cid:127) Our wellness + loyalty program, which benefits members based on accumulating points for certain front end and prescription purchases, and offers + UP rewards to provide members additional savings; (cid:127) Emphasis on the value of our private brand products; (cid:127) Support of specific initiatives and stores, including competitor market intrusion and prescription file buys; and (cid:127) Our vision to be the customer’s first choice for health and wellness products, services and information. Under the umbrella of our ‘‘With Us It’s Personal’’ brand positioning, we promote educational programs focusing on specific health conditions and incentives for patients to transfer their prescriptions to Rite Aid. We are also emphasizing our automated courtesy refill service. We believe all of these programs will help us improve customer satisfaction and grow profitable sales. Associates We believe that our relationships with our associates are good. As of March 2, 2013, we had approximately 89,000 associates: 13% were pharmacists, 43% were part-time and 26% were represented by unions. Associate satisfaction is critical to our success. We have surveyed our associates to obtain feedback on various employment-related topics, including job satisfaction and their understanding of our core values and mission. We have also instituted an internal group, consisting of managers and staff from all components of our business that is responsible for using feedback from associates throughout the Company to create a better work environment. The pharmacist shortage has eased significantly. The increase in the number of graduates from U.S. Schools of Pharmacy is meeting our workforce demand. However, pharmacist employment opportunities still exist in certain areas. Research and Development We do not make significant expenditures for research and development. Licenses, Trademarks and Patents The Rite Aid name is our most significant trademark and the most important factor in marketing our stores and private brand products. We hold licenses to sell beer, wine and liquor, cigarettes and lottery tickets. As part of our strategic alliance with GNC, we have a license to operate GNC ‘‘stores- within-Rite Aid-stores.’’ We also hold licenses to operate our pharmacies and our distribution facilities. Collectively, these licenses are material to our operations. Seasonality We experience moderate seasonal fluctuations in our results of operations concentrated in the first and fourth fiscal quarters as the result of the concentration of the cough, cold and flu season and the holidays. We tailor certain front end merchandise to capitalize on holidays and seasons. We increase our inventory levels during our third fiscal quarter in anticipation of the seasonal fluctuations described 9 above. Our results of operations in the fourth and first fiscal quarters may fluctuate based upon the timing and severity of the cough, cold and flu season, both of which are unpredictable. Regulation Our business is subject to federal, state, and local government laws, regulations and administrative practices. We must comply with numerous provisions regulating health and safety, equal employment opportunity, minimum wage and licensing for the sale of drugs, alcoholic beverages, tobacco and other products. In addition we must comply with regulations pertaining to product content, labeling, dating and pricing. Pursuant to the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990 (‘‘OBRA’’) and comparable state regulations, our pharmacists are required to offer counseling, without additional charge, to our customers about medication, dosage, delivery systems, common side effects and other information deemed significant by the pharmacists and may have a duty to warn customers regarding any potential adverse effects of a prescription drug if the warning could reduce or negate such effect. The appropriate state boards of pharmacy must license our pharmacies and pharmacists. Our pharmacies and distribution centers are also registered with the Federal Drug Enforcement Administration and are subject to Federal Drug Enforcement Agency regulations relative to our pharmacy operations, including regulations governing purchasing, storing and dispensing of controlled substances. Applicable licensing and registration requirements require our compliance with various state statutes, rules and/or regulations. If we were to violate any applicable statute, rule or regulation, our licenses and registrations could be suspended or revoked or we could be subject to fines or penalties. Any such violation could also damage our reputation and brand. In recent years, an increasing number of legislative proposals have been enacted (including the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act), introduced or proposed in Congress and in some state legislatures that affect or would affect major changes in the healthcare system, either nationally or at the state level. The legislative initiatives include changes in reimbursement levels, changes in qualified participants, changes in drug safety regulations and e-prescribing. We cannot predict the timing of enactment of any such proposals to the extent not yet approved or the long-term outcome or effect of legislation from these efforts on our business. Our pharmacy business is subject to patient privacy and other obligations, including corporate, pharmacy and associate responsibility imposed by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. As a covered entity, we are required to implement privacy standards, train our associates on the permitted uses and disclosures of protected health information, provide a notice of privacy practice to our pharmacy customers and permit pharmacy customers to access and amend their records and receive an accounting of disclosures of protected health information. Failure to properly adhere to these requirements could result in the imposition of civil as well as criminal penalties. We are also subject to laws governing our relationship with our associates, including minimum wage requirements, overtime, working conditions and unionizing efforts. Increases in the federal minimum wage rate, associate benefit costs or other costs related to associates could adversely affect our results of operations. In addition, in connection with the ownership and operations of our stores, distribution centers and other sites, we are subject to laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment and health and safety matters, including those governing the management and disposal of hazardous substances and the cleanup of contaminated sites. Violations or liabilities under these laws and regulations as a result of our current or former operations or historical activities at our sites, such as gasoline service stations and dry cleaners, could result in significant costs. 10 Corporate Governance and Internet Address We recognize that good corporate governance is an important means of protecting the interests of our stockholders, associates, customers and the community. We have closely monitored and implemented relevant legislative and regulatory corporate governance reforms, including provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (‘‘Sarbanes-Oxley’’), the rules of the SEC interpreting and implementing Sarbanes-Oxley and the corporate governance listing standards of the NYSE. Our corporate governance information and materials, including our Certificate of Incorporation, Bylaws, Corporate Governance Guidelines, the charters of our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee, our Code of Ethics for the Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers, our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct and our Related Person Transaction Policy are posted on the corporate governance section of our website at www.riteaid.com and are available in print upon request to Rite Aid Corporation, 30 Hunter Lane, Camp Hill, Pennsylvania 17011, Attention: Corporate Secretary. Our Board will regularly review corporate governance developments and modify these materials and practices as warranted. Our website also provides information on how to contact us and other items of interest to investors. We make available on our website, free of charge, our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) data files of our annual report and quarterly reports beginning with our fiscal 2011 second quarter 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to these reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after we file these reports with, or furnish them to, the SEC. We do not intend for the information contained on our website to be part of this annual report on Form 10-K. Item 1A. Risk Factors Factors Affecting our Future Prospects Set forth below is a description of certain risk factors which we believe may be relevant to an understanding of us and our business. Security holders are cautioned that these and other factors may affect future performance and cause actual results to differ from those which may be anticipated. See ‘‘Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.’’ Risks Related to our Financial Condition Current economic conditions may adversely affect our industry, business and results of operations. The United States economy is continuing to feel the impact of the economic downturn that began in late 2007, and the future economic environment may not fully recover to levels prior to the downturn. This economic uncertainty has and could further lead to reduced consumer spending for the foreseeable future. If consumer spending decreases or does not grow, we may not be able to sustain the improvement in our same store sales. In addition, reduced or flat consumer spending may drive us and our competitors to offer additional products at promotional prices, which would have a negative impact on our gross profit. We operate a number of stores in areas that are experiencing a lower recovery than the economy on a national level. A continued softening or slow recovery in consumer spending may adversely affect our industry, business and results of operations. Reduced revenues as a result of decreased consumer spending may also reduce our liquidity and otherwise hinder our ability to implement our long term strategy. We are highly leveraged. Our substantial indebtedness could limit cash flow available for our operations and could adversely affect our ability to service debt or obtain additional financing if necessary. We had, as of March 2, 2013, $6.0 billion of outstanding indebtedness and stockholders’ deficit of $2.5 billion. We also had additional borrowing capacity under our $1.795 billion senior secured 11 revolving credit facility of approximately $1,015.0 million, net of outstanding letters of credit of $115.0 million. Our earnings were insufficient to cover fixed charges and preferred stock dividends for fiscal 2013, 2012, 2011, 2010 and 2009 by $14.0 million, $412.4 million, $564.8 million, $498.4 million and $2.6 billion, respectively. Our high level of indebtedness will continue to restrict our operations. Among other things, our indebtedness will: (cid:127) limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in the markets in which we compete; (cid:127) place us at a competitive disadvantage relative to our competitors with less indebtedness; (cid:127) render us more vulnerable to general adverse economic, regulatory and industry conditions; and (cid:127) require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow to service our debt. Our ability to meet our cash requirements, including our debt service obligations, is dependent upon our ability to substantially improve our operating performance, which will be subject to general economic and competitive conditions and to financial, business and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. We cannot provide any assurance that our business will generate sufficient cash flow from operations to fund our cash requirements and debt service obligations. We believe we have adequate sources of liquidity to meet our anticipated requirements for working capital, debt service and capital expenditures through fiscal 2014 and have no significant debt maturities prior to June 2017. However, if our operating results, cash flow or capital resources prove inadequate, or if interest rates rise significantly, we could face substantial liquidity problems and might be required to dispose of material assets or operations to meet our debt and other obligations or otherwise be required to delay our planned activities. If we are unable to service our debt or experience a significant reduction in our liquidity, we could be forced to reduce or delay planned capital expenditures and other initiatives, sell assets, restructure or refinance our debt or seek additional equity capital, and we may be unable to take any of these actions on satisfactory terms or in a timely manner. Further, any of these actions may not be sufficient to allow us to service our debt obligations or may have an adverse impact on our business. Our existing debt agreements limit our ability to take certain of these actions. Our failure to generate sufficient operating cash flow to pay our debts or refinance our indebtedness could have a material adverse effect on us. Borrowings under our senior secured credit facility are based upon variable rates of interest, which could result in higher expense in the event of increases in interest rates. As of March 2, 2013, approximately $2.3 billion of our outstanding indebtedness bore interest at a rate that varies depending upon the London Interbank Offered Rate (‘‘LIBOR’’). Borrowings under our Tranche 6 Term Loan due February 2020 and our Second Lien facility Tranche 1 Term Loan due August 2020 are subject to a minimum LIBOR floor of 100 basis points. Borrowings under our senior secured revolving credit facility are most sensitive to LIBOR fluctuations because there is no floor. If LIBOR rises, the interest rates on outstanding debt will increase. Therefore an increase in LIBOR would increase our interest payment obligations under those loans and have a negative effect on our cash flow and financial condition. We currently do not maintain hedging contracts that would limit our exposure to variable rates of interest. The covenants in the instruments that govern our current indebtedness may limit our operating and financial flexibility. The covenants in the instruments that govern our current indebtedness limit our ability to: (cid:127) incur debt and liens; 12 (cid:127) pay dividends; (cid:127) make redemptions and repurchases of capital stock; (cid:127) make loans and investments; (cid:127) prepay, redeem or repurchase debt; (cid:127) engage in acquisitions, consolidations, asset dispositions, sale-leaseback transactions and affiliate transactions; (cid:127) change our business; (cid:127) amend some of our debt and other material agreements; (cid:127) issue and sell capital stock of subsidiaries; (cid:127) restrict distributions from subsidiaries; and (cid:127) grant negative pledges to other creditors. The senior secured credit facility contains covenants which place restrictions on the incurrence of debt beyond the restrictions described above, the payment of dividends, sale of assets, mergers and acquisitions and the granting of liens. Our senior secured credit facility has a financial covenant which requires us to maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio. The covenant requires that, if availability on the revolving credit facility is less than $150.0 million, we maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.00 to 1.00. As of March 2, 2013, we had availability under our revolving credit facility of approximately $1,015.0 million and were in compliance with the senior secured credit facility’s financial covenant. Our stockholders will experience dilution if we issue additional common stock. We are generally not restricted from issuing additional shares of our common shares or preferred stock, including, subject to the terms of our outstanding debt instruments, any securities that are convertible into or exchangeable for, or that represent the right to receive, common shares or preferred stock or any substantially similar securities, whether for cash, as part of incentive compensation or in refinancing transactions. Any additional future issuances of common stock will reduce the percentage of our common stock owned by investors who do not participate in such issuances. In most circumstances, stockholders will not be entitled to vote on whether or not we issue additional shares of common stock. The market price of our common stock could decline as a result of issuances of a large number of shares of our common stock or the perception that such issuances could occur. Subject to certain limitations, Jean Coutu Group may continue to sell Rite Aid common stock at any time, which could cause our stock price to decrease. The shares of Rite Aid common stock that the Jean Coutu Group currently holds are subject to limitations on sale and may only be sold under certain circumstances, including pursuant to a registered underwritten public offering under the Securities Act or in accordance with Rule 144 under the Securities Act. For example, from time to time the Jean Coutu Group has announced the sale of shares of our common stock pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities Act. On April 17, 2013, the Jean Coutu Group announced that it had sold 72,500,000 of its 178,401,162 shares of our common stock pursuant to Rule 144. We have entered into a registration rights agreement with Jean Coutu Group, which will give Jean Coutu Group the right to require us to register all or a portion of its shares at any time (subject to certain exceptions). The sale of a substantial number of our shares by Jean Coutu Group or our other stockholders within a short period of time could cause our stock price to decrease, make it more difficult for us to raise funds through future offerings of Rite Aid common stock or acquire other businesses using Rite Aid common stock as consideration. 13 We are in compliance with all New York Stock Exchange continued listing requirements. However, if we do not continue to maintain compliance with such requirements, our common stock may be delisted. We are in compliance with all NYSE listing rules, have actively been taking steps to maintain our listing and expect our efforts to maintain our NYSE listing will be successful. However, there can be no assurance that we will maintain compliance with the NYSE minimum share price rule or other continued listing requirements. In the event of a delisting, all holders of our $64.2 million of outstanding 8.5% Convertible Notes due May 2015 (‘‘Convertible Notes’’) would be entitled to require us to repurchase their Convertible Notes. Our senior secured credit facility permits us to make such a repurchase of the Convertible Notes; provided that, before and after such transaction, no default or event of default shall have occurred and be continuing under the senior secured credit facility and we have more than $100.0 million of availability under our revolving credit facility. Our ability to pay cash to holders of the Convertible Notes may be limited by our financial resources at the time of such repurchase. We cannot assure you that sufficient financing will be available on terms acceptable to us if necessary to make any required repurchase of the Convertible Notes. Risks Related to our Operations We need to improve our operations in order to improve our financial condition, but our operations will not improve if we cannot effectively implement our business strategy or if our strategy is negatively affected by worsening economic conditions. We have not yet achieved the sales productivity level of our major competitors. We believe that improving the sales of existing stores is important to improving profitability and operating cash flow. If we are not successful in implementing our strategies, including our efforts to increase sales and further reduce costs, or if our strategies are not effective, we may not be able to improve our operations. In addition, any further adverse change or continued weakness in general economic conditions or major industries can adversely affect drug benefit plans and reduce our pharmacy sales. Adverse changes in general economic conditions could affect consumer buying practices and consequently reduce our sales of front end products, and cause a decrease in our profitability. Failure to improve operations or a continued weakness in major industries or general economic conditions would adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows and our ability to make principal or interest payments on our debt. For so long as Jean Coutu Group (and, subject to certain conditions, certain members of the Coutu family) maintain certain levels of Rite Aid stock ownership, Jean Coutu Group (and, subject to certain conditions, certain members of the Coutu family) could exercise significant influence over us. At March 2, 2013, Jean Coutu Group owned approximately 19.0% of the voting power of Rite Aid. Jean Coutu Group (and, subject to certain conditions, certain members of the Coutu family) generally has the ability to significantly influence the outcome of any matter submitted for the vote of our stockholders. The stockholder agreement (the ‘‘Stockholder Agreement’’) that we entered into at the time of the Brooks Eckerd acquisition provides that Jean Coutu Group (and, subject to certain conditions, certain members of the Coutu family) has the right to designate two members of our board of directors, subject to adjustment for future reductions in its ownership position in us. On April 17, 2013, the Jean Coutu Group announced that it had sold 72,500,000 of its 178,401,162 shares of our common stock and now owns approximately 11.3% of our voting power. As a result of such sale, the Jean Coutu Group was required to cause one of its designees to immediately resign from our board of directors and accordingly Michel Coutu resigned from our board of directors effective April 17, 2013. The Jean Coutu Group will continue to have the right to designate one member of our board of directors, subject to adjustment for future reductions in its ownership position in us. Accordingly, Jean Coutu Group generally is, and is expected to continue to be, able to significantly influence the outcome of all matters that come before our board of directors. As a result of its significant interest in us, Jean 14 Coutu Group may have the power, subject to applicable law (including the fiduciary duties of the directors designated by Jean Coutu Group), to significantly influence actions that might be favorable to Jean Coutu Group, but not necessarily favorable to our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the ownership position and governance rights of Jean Coutu Group could discourage a third party from proposing a change of control or other strategic transaction concerning us. Conflicts of interest may arise between us and Jean Coutu Group, which may be resolved in a manner that adversely affects our business, financial condition or results of operations. Following the Brooks Eckerd acquisition, Jean Coutu Group has continued its Canadian operations but no longer has any operations in the United States, and we currently have no operations in Canada. Despite the lack of geographic overlap, conflicts of interest may arise between us and Jean Coutu Group in areas relating to past, ongoing and future relationships, including corporate opportunities, potential acquisitions or financing transactions, sales or other dispositions by Jean Coutu Group of its interests in us and the exercise by Jean Coutu Group of its influence over our management and affairs. One director on our board of directors is also an officer and director of Jean Coutu Group or its subsidiaries. Service as a director or officer of both Rite Aid and Jean Coutu Group or its other subsidiaries could create conflicts of interest if such person is faced with decisions that could have materially different implications for Rite Aid and for Jean Coutu Group. Apart from the conflicts of interest policy contained in our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct and applicable to our directors, we and Jean Coutu Group have not established any formal procedures for us and Jean Coutu Group to resolve potential or actual conflicts of interest between us. There can be no assurance that any of the foregoing conflicts will be resolved in a manner that does not adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. We are substantially dependent on a single wholesaler of branded pharmaceutical products to sell products to us on satisfactory terms. A disruption in this relationship may have a negative effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flow. We purchase all of our brand prescription drugs from a single wholesaler, McKesson, pursuant to a supply contract that runs through March 31, 2016. Pharmacy sales represented approximately 67.6% of our total sales during fiscal 2013, and, therefore, our relationship with McKesson is important to us. Any significant disruptions in our relationship with McKesson would make it difficult for us to continue to operate our business until we executed a replacement wholesaler agreement or developed and implemented self-distribution processes. There can be no assurance that we would be able to find a replacement wholesaler on a timely basis or that such a wholesaler would be able to fulfill our demands on similar terms, which would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. In addition, because McKesson acts as a wholesaler for drugs purchased from ultimate manufacturers worldwide, any disruption in the supply of a given drug could adversely impact McKesson’s ability to fulfill our demands, which would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. A significant disruption in our computer systems or a cyber security breach could adversely affect our operations. We rely extensively on our computer systems to manage our ordering, pricing, point-of-sale, inventory replenishment and other processes. Our systems are subject to damage or interruption from power outages, computer and telecommunications failures, computer viruses, cyber security breaches, vandalism, severe weather conditions, catastrophic events and human error, and our disaster recovery planning cannot account for all eventualities. If our systems are damaged, fail to function properly or otherwise become unavailable, we may incur substantial costs to repair or replace them, and may 15 experience loss of critical data and interruptions or delays in our ability to perform critical functions, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations. Any compromise of our security could also result in a violation of applicable privacy and other laws, significant legal and financial exposure, damage to our reputation, loss or misuse of the information and a loss of confidence in our security measures, which could harm our business. Risks Related to our Industry The markets in which we operate are very competitive and further increases in competition could adversely affect us. We face intense competition with local, regional and national companies, including other drugstore chains, independently owned drugstores, supermarkets, mass merchandisers, dollar stores and internet pharmacies. Competition from discount stores has significantly increased during the past few years. Our industry also faces growing competition from companies who import drugs directly from other countries, such as Canada, as well as from large-scale retailers that offer generic drugs at a substantial discount. Some of our competitors have or may merge with or acquire pharmaceutical services companies, pharmacy benefit managers or mail order facilities, which may further increase competition. We may not be able to effectively compete against them because our existing or potential competitors may have financial and other resources that are superior to ours. In addition, we may be at a competitive disadvantage because we are more highly leveraged than our competitors. The ability of our stores to achieve profitability depends on their ability to achieve a critical mass of loyal, repeat customers. We believe that the continued consolidation of the drugstore industry will further increase competitive pressures in the industry. We cannot assure you that we will be able to continue to effectively compete in our markets or increase our sales volume in response to further increased competition. Consolidation in the healthcare industry could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Many organizations in the healthcare industry, including pharmacy benefit managers, have consolidated or are in the process of consolidating, such as the merger of Express Scripts and Medco Health Solutions, to create larger healthcare enterprises with greater market power, which has resulted in greater pricing pressures. If this consolidation trend continues, it could give the resulting enterprises even greater bargaining power, which may lead to further pressure on the prices for our products and services. If these pressures result in reductions in our prices, our business will become less profitable unless we are able to achieve corresponding reductions in costs or develop profitable new revenue streams. We expect that market demand, government regulation, third-party reimbursement policies, government contracting requirements, and societal pressures will continue to cause the healthcare industry to evolve, potentially resulting in further business consolidations and alliances among the industry participants we engage with, which may adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations. 16 The availability of pharmacy drugs is subject to governmental regulations. The continued conversion of various prescription drugs, including potential conversions of a number of popular medications, to over-the-counter medications may reduce our pharmacy sales and customers may seek to purchase such medications at non-pharmacy stores. Also, if the rate at which new prescription drugs become available slows or if new prescription drugs that are introduced into the market fail to achieve popularity, our pharmacy sales may be adversely affected. The withdrawal of certain drugs from the market or concerns about the safety or effectiveness of certain drugs or negative publicity surrounding certain categories of drugs may also have a negative effect on our pharmacy sales or may cause shifts in our pharmacy or front end product mix. Changes in third party reimbursement levels for prescription drugs and changes in industry pricing benchmarks could reduce our margins and have a material adverse effect on our business. Sales of prescription drugs reimbursed by third party payors, including the Medicare Part D plans and state sponsored Medicaid and related managed care Medicaid agencies, represented 96.6% of our business in fiscal 2013. The continued efforts of the Federal government, health maintenance organizations, managed care organizations, pharmacy benefit management companies, other State and local government entities, and other third-party payors to reduce prescription drug costs and pharmacy reimbursement rates, as well as litigation relating to how drugs are priced, may impact our profitability. In addition, some of these entities may offer pricing terms that we may not be willing to accept or otherwise restrict our participation in their networks of pharmacy providers. Any significant loss of third-party business could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. Certain provisions of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (‘‘DRA’’) sought to reduce federal spending by altering the Medicaid reimbursement formula for multi-source (i.e., generic) drugs (‘‘AMP’’). Although those reductions did not go into effect, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, signed into law on March 23, 2010 (the ‘‘Patient Care Act’’) enacted a modified AMP reimbursement formula for multi-source drugs. The modified formula, when implemented, may reduce Medicaid reimbursements which could affect our revenues and profits. There have also been a number of other recent proposals and enactments by the Federal government and various states to reduce Medicare Part D and Medicaid reimbursement levels in response to budget problems. We expect other similar proposals in the future. We are subject to governmental regulations, procedures and requirements; our noncompliance or a significant regulatory change could adversely affect our business, the results of our operations or our financial condition. Our business is subject to numerous federal, state and local regulations. Changes in these regulations may require extensive system and operating changes that may be difficult to implement. Untimely compliance or noncompliance with applicable regulations could result in the imposition of civil and criminal penalties that could adversely affect the continued operation of our business, including: (i) suspension of payments from government programs; (ii) loss of required government certifications; (iii) loss of authorizations to participate in or exclusion from government reimbursement programs, such as the Medicare and Medicaid programs; (iv) loss of licenses; or (v) significant fines or monetary penalties. The regulations to which we are subject include, but are not limited to, federal, state and local registration and regulation of pharmacies; applicable Medicare and Medicaid regulations; the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act or (‘‘HIPAA’’); laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment and health and safety matters, including those governing exposure to and the management and disposal of hazardous substances; regulations of the U. S. Federal Trade Commission, the U. S. Department of Health and Human Services and the Drug Enforcement Administration as well as state regulatory authorities, governing the sale, advertisement 17 and promotion of products we sell; anti-kickback laws; false claims laws and federal and state laws governing the practice of the profession of pharmacy. We are also governed by federal and state laws of general applicability, including laws regulating matters of wage and hour laws, working conditions, health and safety and equal employment opportunity. Certain risks are inherent in providing pharmacy services; our insurance may not be adequate to cover any claims against us. Pharmacies are exposed to risks inherent in the packaging and distribution of pharmaceuticals and other healthcare products, such as with respect to improper filling of prescriptions, labeling of prescriptions, adequacy of warnings, unintentional distribution of counterfeit drugs and expiration of drugs. In addition, federal and state laws that require our pharmacists to offer counseling, without additional charge, to their customers about medication, dosage, delivery systems, common side effects and other information the pharmacists deem significant can impact our business. Our pharmacists may also have a duty to warn customers regarding any potential negative effects of a prescription drug if the warning could reduce or negate these effects. Although we maintain professional liability and errors and omissions liability insurance, from time to time, claims result in the payment of significant amounts, some portions of which are not funded by insurance. We cannot assure you that the coverage limits under our insurance programs will be adequate to protect us against future claims, or that we will be able to maintain this insurance on acceptable terms in the future. Our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows may be adversely affected if in the future our insurance coverage proves to be inadequate or unavailable or there is an increase in liability for which we self-insure or we suffer reputational harm as a result of an error or omission. We may be subject to significant liability should the consumption of any of our products cause injury, illness or death. Products that we sell could become subject to contamination, product tampering, mislabeling or other damage requiring us to recall our private brand products. In addition, errors in the dispensing and packaging of pharmaceuticals could lead to serious injury or death. Product liability claims may be asserted against us with respect to any of the products or pharmaceuticals we sell and we may be obligated to recall our private brand products. A product liability judgment against us or a product recall could have a material, adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. If we fail to protect the security of personal information about our customers and associates, we could be subject to costly government enforcement actions or private litigation. Through our sales and marketing activities, we collect and store certain personal information that our customers provide to purchase products or services, enroll in promotional programs, register on our web site, or otherwise communicate and interact with us. We also gather and retain information about our associates in the normal course of business. We may share information about such persons with vendors that assist with certain aspects of our business. Despite instituted safeguards for the protection of such information, security could be compromised and confidential customer or business information misappropriated. Loss of customer or business information could disrupt our operations, damage our reputation, and expose us to claims from customers, financial institutions, payment card associations and other persons, any of which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, compliance with tougher privacy and information security laws and standards may result in significant expense due to increased investment in technology and the development of new operational processes. For example, in July 2010, settlement orders between us and the Federal Trade Commission and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights were accepted by the agencies. The agencies’ allegations were that we failed to protect patient and associate identifiable information. As a result of these settlement orders, we, without 18 admitting any liability, agreed to pay a $1.1 million penalty and are required to establish a comprehensive information security program, revise HIPAA-related policies and procedures and retain an independent assessor to conduct periodic compliance reviews. Item 1B. Unresolved SEC Staff Comments None Item 2. Properties As of March 2, 2013, we operated 4,623 retail drugstores. The overall average selling square feet of each store in our chain is approximately 10,000 square feet. The overall average total square feet of each store in our chain is approximately 12,600. The stores in the eastern part of the U.S. average 8,900 selling square feet per store (11,100 average total square feet per store). The stores in the western part of the U.S. average 15,100 selling square feet per store (19,400 average total square feet per store). 19 The table below identifies the number of stores by state as of March 2, 2013: State Store Count Alabama . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Colorado . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Connecticut . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Delaware . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . District of Columbia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Georgia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Idaho . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Indiana . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Kentucky . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Louisiana . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Massachusetts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Maine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Maryland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Michigan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mississippi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . North Carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Nevada . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . New Hampshire . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . New Jersey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . New York . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ohio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Oregon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Pennsylvania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rhode Island . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . South Carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tennessee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Utah . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Vermont . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Virginia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Washington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . West Virginia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93 583 20 77 42 7 189 13 10 116 64 153 79 145 279 26 226 1 68 262 620 224 71 540 43 96 82 22 38 192 138 104 Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,623 Our stores have the following attributes at March 2, 2013: Attribute Number Percentage Freestanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Drive through pharmacy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GNC stores within a Rite Aid store . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,800 2,400 2,186 60.6% 51.9% 47.3% We lease 4,363 of our operating drugstore facilities under non-cancelable leases, many of which have original terms of 10 to 22 years. In addition to minimum rental payments, which are set at competitive market rates, certain leases require additional payments based on sales volume, as well as reimbursement for taxes, maintenance and insurance. Most of our leases contain renewal options, some of which involve rent increases. The remaining 260 drugstore facilities are owned. 20 We own our corporate headquarters, which is located in a 205,000 square foot building at 30 Hunter Lane, Camp Hill, Pennsylvania 17011. We lease 366,400 square feet of space in various buildings near Harrisburg, Pennsylvania for document warehousing use and additional administrative personnel. We own additional buildings near Harrisburg, Pennsylvania which total 105,800 square feet and house our model store and additional administrative personnel. We operate the following distribution centers and satellite distribution locations, which we own or lease as indicated: Location Owned or Leased Approximate Square Footage Poca, West Virginia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Owned Leased Dunbar, West Virginia(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Perryman, Maryland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Owned Perryman, Maryland(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Leased Tuscaloosa, Alabama . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Owned Leased Cottondale, Alabama(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Pontiac, Michigan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Owned Woodland, California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Owned Leased Woodland, California(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Wilsonville, Oregon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Leased Lancaster, California . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Owned Charlotte, North Carolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Owned Charlotte, North Carolina(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Leased Dayville, Connecticut . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Owned Liverpool, New York . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Owned Philadelphia, Pennsylvania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Owned Leased Philadelphia, Pennsylvania(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 255,000 110,000 885,000 262,000 230,000 224,000 325,000 513,000 200,000 547,000 914,000 585,500 291,000 460,000 828,000 245,000 415,000 (1) Satellite distribution locations. The original terms of the leases for our distribution centers and satellite distribution locations range from 5 to 22 years. In addition to minimum rental payments, certain distribution centers require tax reimbursement, maintenance and insurance. Most leases contain renewal options, some of which involve rent increases. Although from time to time, we may be near capacity at some of our distribution facilities, particularly at our older facilities, we believe that the capacity of our facilities is adequate. We also own a 55,800 square foot ice cream manufacturing facility and lease a 32,000 square foot storage facility located in El Monte, California. On a regular basis and as part of our normal business, we evaluate store performance and may reduce in size, close or relocate a store if the store is redundant, underperforming or otherwise deemed unsuitable. We also evaluate strategic dispositions and acquisitions of facilities and prescription files. When we reduce in size, close or relocate a store or close distribution center facilities, we often continue to have leasing obligations or own the property. We attempt to sublease this space. As of March 2, 2013, we had 7,864,223 square feet of excess space, 5,179,212 square feet of which was subleased. Item 3. Legal Proceedings Since December 2008, we have been named in a series of fifteen (15) currently pending putative collective and class action lawsuits filed in federal and state courts around the country, purportedly on 21 behalf of current and former assistant store managers and co-managers working in our stores at various locations outside California, including Craig et al v. Rite Aid Corporation et al pending in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania (the ‘‘Court’’) and Ibea et al v. Rite Aid Corporation pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The lawsuits allege that we failed to pay overtime to salaried assistant store managers and co-managers as purportedly required under the Fair Labor Standards Act (‘‘FLSA’’) and certain state statutes. The lawsuits also seek other relief, including liquidated damages, punitive damages, attorneys’ fees, costs and injunctive relief arising out of the state and federal claims for overtime pay. We have aggressively challenged both the merits of the lawsuits and the allegation that the cases should be certified as class or collective actions. However, in light of the cost and uncertainty involved in these lawsuits, in May 2012, we entered into a settlement agreement with Plaintiffs’ counsel to resolve the series of lawsuits. The parties filed a joint motion for preliminary approval of the settlement with the Court which was granted on June 18, 2012. A final resolution of these matters was subject to final Court approval. The Court held a final approval hearing on December 4, 2012 and issued an Order approving the settlement on January 7, 2013. The Order was not appealed and is final. Settlement funds to those who chose to participate in the settlement were disbursed on March 13, 2013 concluding the matter. We have been named in a collective and class action lawsuit, Indergit v. Rite Aid Corporation et al pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed purportedly on behalf of current and former store managers working in our stores at various locations around the country. The lawsuit alleges that we failed to pay overtime to store managers as required under the FLSA and under certain New York state statutes. The lawsuit also seeks other relief, including liquidated damages, punitive damages, attorneys’ fees, costs and injunctive relief arising out of state and federal claims for overtime pay. On April 2, 2010, the Court conditionally certified a nationwide collective group of individuals who worked for us as store managers since March 31, 2007. The Court ordered that Notice of the Indergit action be sent to the purported members of the collective group (approximately 7,000 current and former store managers) and approximately 1,550 joined the Indergit action. Discovery as to certification issues has been completed. The parties have fully briefed the issues of Rule 23 class certification of the New York store manager claims and decertification of the nationwide collective action claims and are awaiting a ruling from the Court. At this time, we are not able to either predict the outcome of this lawsuit or estimate a potential range of loss with respect to the lawsuit. Our management believes, however, that this lawsuit is without merit and not appropriate for collective or class action treatment and is vigorously defending this lawsuit. We are currently a defendant in several putative class action lawsuits filed in state courts in California alleging violations of California wage and hour laws, rules and regulations pertaining primarily to failure to pay overtime, pay for missed meals and rest periods and failure to provide employee seating. These suits purport to be class actions and seek substantial damages. At this time, we are not able to either predict the outcome of these lawsuits or estimate a potential range of loss with respect to the lawsuits. Our management believes, however, that the plaintiffs’ allegations are without merit and that their claims are not appropriate for class action treatment. We are vigorously defending all of these claims. We were served with a United States Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General (‘‘OIG’’) subpoena dated March 5, 2010 in connection with an investigation being conducted by the OIG and the United States Attorney’s Office for the Central District of California. The subpoena requests records related to any gift card inducement programs for customers who transferred prescriptions for drugs or medicines to our pharmacies, and whether any customers who receive federally funded prescription benefits (e.g. Medicare and Medicaid) may have benefited from those programs. We have substantially completed our production of records in response to the subpoena and are unable to predict the timing or outcome of any review by the government of such information. 22 We received a subpoena dated May 9, 2011 from certain California counties seeking information regarding compliance with environmental regulations governing the management of hazardous waste. We have responded to the subpoena, are cooperating with California regulators, and continue to review our operations pertaining to the management of hazardous materials. We are in discussions with the California regulators and have recorded an estimated amount to settle these matters. We were served with a Civil Investigative Demand Subpoena Duces Tecum dated August 26, 2011 by the United States Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Michigan. The subpoena requests records regarding Rite Aid’s Rx Savings Program and the reporting of usual and customary charges to publicly funded health programs. In connection with the same investigation, we were served with a Civil Subpoena Duces Tecum dated February 22, 2013 by the State of Indiana Office of the Attorney General. We are completing our response to both of the subpoenas and are unable to predict the timing or outcome of any review by the government of such information. In addition to the above described matters, we are subject from time to time to various claims and lawsuits and governmental investigations arising in the ordinary course of our business. While our management cannot predict the outcome of any of the claims, our management does not believe that the outcome of any of these legal matters will be material to our consolidated financial position. It is possible, however, that our results of operations or cash flows in a particular fiscal period could be materially affected by an unfavorable resolution of pending litigation or contingencies. Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures Not applicable PART II Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuers Purchases of Equity Securities. Our common stock is listed on the NYSE under the symbol ‘‘RAD.’’ On April 11, 2013, we had approximately 23,400 stockholders of record. Quarterly high and low closing stock prices, based on the composite transactions, are shown below. Fiscal Year Quarter High Low 2014 (through April 11, 2013) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . First 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . First 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . First Second Third Fourth Second Third Fourth $2.12 2.05 1.45 1.33 1.70 1.31 1.35 1.33 1.67 $1.65 1.18 1.12 1.00 0.97 0.98 0.97 0.91 1.14 We have not declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock since the third quarter of fiscal 2000 and we do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Our senior secured credit facility, second priority secured term loan facility and some of the indentures that govern our other outstanding indebtedness restrict our ability to pay dividends. We have not sold any unregistered equity securities during the period covered by this report, nor have we repurchased any equity securities, during the period covered by this report. 23 STOCK PERFORMANCE GRAPH The graph below compares the yearly percentage change in the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock for the last five fiscal years with the cumulative total return on (i) the Russell 1000 Consumer Staples Index, (ii) the Russell 2000 Consumer Staples Index, (iii) the Russell 1000 Index, and (iv) the Russell 2000 Index, over the same period (assuming the investment of $100.00 in our common stock and such indexes on March 1, 2008 and reinvestment of dividends). For comparison of cumulative total return, we have elected to use the Russell 2000 Consumer Staples Index, consisting of 66 companies, and the Russell 2000 Index. In the past we used the Russell 1000 Consumer Staples Index and the Russell 1000 Index but we feel this is a better comparison of the company to a peer group of similar sized companies. The Russell 2000 Consumer Staples Index is a capitalization-weighted index of companies that provide products directly to consumers that are typically considered nondiscretionary items based on consumer purchasing habits. The Russell 2000 Index consists of the smallest 2000 companies in the Russell 3000 Index and represents the universe of small capitalization stocks from which many active money managers typically select. STOCK PERFORMANCE GRAPH Comparison of 5 Year Cumulative Total Return Assumes Initial Investment of $100 March 2013 180.00 160.00 140.00 120.00 100.00 80.00 60.00 40.00 20.00 0.00 3/1/2008 2/28/2009 2/27/2010 2/26/2011 3/3/2012 3/2/2013 Rite Aid Corporation Russell 1000 Index Russell 1000 Consumer Staples Index Russell 2000 Index Russell 2000 Consumer Staples Index 13APR201302373847 RITE AID CORP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Russell 1000 Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Russell 1000 Consumer Staples Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Russell 2000 Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Russell 2000 Consumer Staples Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10.49 56.39 75.19 57.62 71.47 56.93 87.59 104.65 94.46 102.31 47.94 107.68 120.22 125.03 120.44 62.55 113.87 139.89 123.76 125.83 62.92 129.28 165.28 143.17 149.00 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Item 6. Selected Financial Data The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with ‘‘Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations’’ and the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes. 24 Selected financial data for the fiscal year 2009 has been adjusted to reflect the operations of our 28 stores in the Las Vegas market area as a discontinued operations as we entered into an agreement to sell the prescription files and terminate the operations of these stores during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008. Summary of Operations: Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Costs and expense: Cost of goods sold . . . . . . . . . . . Selling, general and administrative expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Goodwill impairment charge . . . . . Lease termination and impairment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loss on debt retirements, net . . . . (Gain) loss on sale of assets and charges investments, net . . . . . . . . . . . . Fiscal Year Ended March 2, 2013 (52 weeks) March 3, 2012 (53 weeks) February 26, 2011 (52 weeks) February 27, 2010 (52 weeks) February 28, 2009 (52 weeks) (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) $ 25,392,263 $ 26,121,222 $ 25,214,907 $ 25,669,117 $ 26,289,268 18,073,987 19,327,887 18,522,403 18,845,027 19,253,616 6,600,765 — 6,531,411 — 6,457,833 — 6,603,372 — 6,985,367 1,810,223 70,859 515,421 140,502 100,053 529,255 33,576 210,893 547,581 44,003 208,017 515,763 993 293,743 477,627 39,905 (16,776) (8,703) (22,224) (24,137) 11,581 Total costs and expenses . . . . . . . . . 25,384,758 26,513,479 25,760,489 26,149,035 28,872,062 Income (loss) before income taxes . . Income tax (benefit) expense . . . . . . 7,505 (110,600) (392,257) (23,686) (545,582) 9,842 (479,918) 26,758 (2,582,794) 329,257 Net income (loss) from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118,105 (368,571) (555,424) (506,676) (2,912,051) Loss from discontinued operations, net of gain on disposal and income tax benefit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — — — — (3,369) Net income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 118,105 $ (368,571) $ (555,424) $ (506,676) $ (2,915,420) Basic and diluted income (loss) per share: Basic income (loss) per share . . . . . Diluted income (loss) per share . . . . Year-End Financial Position: Working capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Property, plant and equipment, net . . Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stockholders’ deficit . . . . . . . . . . . . Other Data: Cash flows (used in) provided by: Operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . Investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . Financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . Capital expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . Basic weighted average shares . . . . . Diluted weighted average shares . . . Number of retail drugstores . . . . . . . Number of associates . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ $ $ $ 0.12 0.12 $ 1,830,777 1,895,650 7,078,719 6,033,531 (2,459,434) (0.43) $ (0.43) $ (0.64) $ (0.64) $ (0.59) $ (0.59) $ (3.49) (3.49) 1,934,267 1,902,021 7,364,291 6,328,201 (2,586,756) $ 1,991,042 2,039,383 7,555,850 6,219,865 (2,211,367) $ 2,332,976 2,293,153 8,049,911 6,370,899 (1,673,551) $ 2,062,505 2,587,356 8,326,540 6,011,709 (1,199,652) 819,588 (346,305) (506,116) 382,980 889,562,000 907,259,000 4,623 89,000 266,537 (221,169) 25,801 250,137 885,819,000 885,819,000 4,667 90,000 395,849 (156,677) (251,650) 186,520 882,947,000 882,947,000 4,714 91,800 (325,063) (120,486) 397,108 193,630 880,843,000 880,843,000 4,780 97,500 359,910 (346,358) (17,279) 541,346 840,812,000 840,812,000 4,901 103,000 25 Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Overview Net income for fiscal 2013 was $118.1 million or $0.12 per basic and diluted share, compared to net loss for fiscal 2012 of $368.6 million or $0.43 per basic and diluted share and a net loss for fiscal 2011 of $555.4 million or $0.64 per basic and diluted share. The substantial improvement in our operating results is driven primarily by script count growth, the gross profit benefit from introductions of new generics and a current year LIFO credit of $147.9 million as compared to a charge last year, partially offset by higher selling, general and administrative expenses (‘‘SG&A’’). Our operating results are described in more detail in the ‘‘Results of Operations’’ section below. Some of the key factors that impacted our results in fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011 are summarized as follows: Sales Trends: Our revenue decline for fiscal 2013 was 2.8% compared to revenue growth of 3.6% for fiscal 2012 and a revenue decline of 1.8% for fiscal 2011. Fiscal 2013 revenues were negatively impacted by the extra week in fiscal 2012 and recent generic introductions, which have a substantially lower selling price than their brand counterparts, as well as continued reimbursement pressures. These decreases were partially offset by an increase of 3.4% in same store prescription count. Gross Profit: Our gross profit was positively impacted by recent generic introductions, which have a higher gross profit than their brand counterparts, increased same store prescription count and a current year LIFO credit. We record the value of our inventory on the Last-In, First-Out (LIFO) method. We recorded a non-cash LIFO credit of $147.9 million, a non-cash LIFO charge of $188.7 million and a non-cash LIFO charge of $44.9 million in fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The current year LIFO credit was due to significant generic drug deflation, partially offset by normal inflation on both brand drugs and front end products. Selling, General and Administrative Expenses: Our selling, general and administrative expenses (‘‘SG&A’’) increased in fiscal 2013 due primarily to the reversal of certain tax indemnification assets partially offset by lower operating costs associated with one less week this year. SG&A expenses as a percentage of revenue was 26.0% in fiscal 2013 compared to 25.0% in fiscal 2012. The increase in SG&A as a percentage of revenues relative to the prior year is due in part to the continued impact of recent generic introductions and reimbursement rate pressures which has resulted in a lower revenue base to measure our SG&A expenses against. Lease Termination and Impairment Charges: We recorded lease terminations and impairment charges of $70.9 million in fiscal 2013 compared to $100.1 million and $210.9 million in fiscal 2012 and 2011, respectively. Our charges have been trending lower due to improved results of operations which reduces our impairment charges and closing fewer stores requiring lease termination charges. Debt Refinancing: During fiscal 2013, we continued to take steps to extend the terms of our debt, reduce interest costs and to obtain more flexibility and we expect to engage in similar efforts in the future. During fiscal 2013, we completed two debt refinancings. In February 2013, we increased our senior secured revolving credit facility to $1.795 billion, with an extended maturity of February 2018, and obtained new first and second priority secured term loans of $1.161 billion due 2020 and $470.0 million due 2020, respectively. The proceeds from these new borrowings, along with available cash, were used to refinance $1.370 billion of term loans and $1.060 billion aggregate principal of senior secured notes and debentures. This transaction resulted in a loss on debt retirement of $122.7 million which was recorded in the fourth quarter. This refinancing extends maturities and will reduce annual interest expense by $60.0 million. In February 2012, we issued $481.0 million of our 9.25% senior notes due March 2020 and in May 2012, we issued an additional $421.0 million of our 9.25% senior notes due 2020. The proceeds of the notes, together with available cash were used to repurchase and repay the 8.625% senior notes due 26 2015 and the 9.375% senior notes due 2015, respectively. This transaction resulted in a loss on debt retirement of $17.8 million. These transactions are described in more detail in the ‘‘Liquidity and Capital Resources’’ section below. Income Tax: Net income for fiscal 2013 included income tax benefit of $110.6 million, compared to income tax benefit of $23.7 million for fiscal 2012 and income tax expense of $9.8 million for fiscal 2011. During fiscal 2013 we reached agreements with the Internal Revenue Service (‘‘IRS’’) and Commonwealth of Massachusetts Appellate Divisions settling the examinations of the Brooks Eckerd fiscal years 2004 - 2007 and fiscal years 2005 - 2007, respectively. The settlements with the IRS and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts did not impact our net financial position, results of operations or cash flows. The benefit recognized in fiscal 2013 was primarily comprised of recognition of previously unrecognized tax benefits resulting from the appellate settlements discussed above. This amount is offset by a reversal of the related tax indemnification asset which was recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses. The fiscal 2012 income tax benefit was primarily attributable to the unrecognized tax benefits due to the lapse of statute of limitations and the income tax expense for fiscal 2011 comprised of the accrual of state and local taxes and adjustments to unrecognized tax benefits. We maintain a full valuation allowance against the net deferred tax assets. ASC 740, ‘‘Income Taxes’’ requires a company to evaluate its deferred tax assets on a regular basis to determine if a valuation allowance against the net deferred tax assets is required. A cumulative loss in recent years is significant negative evidence in considering whether deferred tax assets are realizable. Based on the negative evidence, ASC 740 precludes relying on projections of future taxable income to support the recognition of deferred tax assets. 27 Results of Operations Revenue and Other Operating Data Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Revenue (decline) growth . . . . . . . . . . . Same store sales (decline) growth . . . . . Pharmacy sales (decline) growth . . . . . . Same store prescription count increase (decrease) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Same store pharmacy sales (decline) growth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Pharmacy sales as a % of total sales . . . Third party sales as a % of total pharmacy sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Front end sales growth (decline) . . . . . . Same store front end sales growth (decline) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Front end sales as a % of total sales . . . Store data: Total stores (beginning of period) . . . . New stores . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Closed stores . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total stores (end of period) . . . . . . . . Remodeled stores . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Relocated stores . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . March 2, 2013 (52 Weeks) Year Ended March 3, 2012 (53 Weeks) February 26, 2011 (52 Weeks) $25,392,263 (Dollars in thousands) $26,121,222 $25,214,907 (2.8)% (0.3)% (1.6)% 3.4% (1.0)% 67.6% 96.6% 0.8% 1.4% 32.4% 4,667 — (44) 4,623 516 13 3.6% 2.0% 1.9% 0.9% 2.4% 68.1% 96.5% 0.7% 1.1% 31.9% 4,714 — (47) 4,667 279 15 (1.8)% (0.7)% (1.8)% (1.2)% (0.9)% 67.8% 96.2% (1.6)% (0.3)% 32.2% 4,780 3 (69) 4,714 19 28 Revenues Fiscal 2013 compared to Fiscal 2012: The 2.8% decrease in revenue was due primarily to one less week in fiscal 2013 and a decrease in same store sales. The decrease in same stores sales was driven primarily by recent generic introductions and continued reimbursement rate pressures, partially offset by increased same store prescription count, the positive impact of our wellness + loyalty program, and other management initiatives to increase sales. The increase in same store prescription count was driven in part by the Walgreens / Express Scripts dispute which was settled in September 2012, our immunization program and our wellness + loyalty program. We expect lower reimbursement rates, our cycling of the Express Scripts business and the softening benefit of new generic introductions in fiscal 2014 to continue to have a negative impact on our revenues. Same store sales trends for fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2012 are described in the following paragraphs. We include in same store sales all stores that have been open at least one year. Stores in liquidation are considered closed. Relocation stores are not included in same store sales until one year has lapsed. Pharmacy same store sales decreased 1.0%. Pharmacy same store sales were negatively impacted by recent generic drug introductions, which have a substantially lower selling price than their brand counterparts but higher gross profit. Also contributing to the decrease are continued reimbursement rate pressures. These decreases were partially offset by an increase of 3.4% in same store prescription count driven in part by incremental prescriptions gained from the Walgreens / Express Scripts dispute and by our immunization program and wellness + loyalty program. 28 Front end same store sales increased 1.4%. The increase in front end same store sales reflects the positive impact of our wellness + loyalty program, incremental sales from our Wellness format stores, and other management initiatives to increase front end sales. Active wellness + members, defined as those who have used their cards at least twice during the last twenty-six weeks, was over 25 million as of March 2, 2013. We have completed 797 Wellness store remodels as of March 2, 2013. Fiscal 2012 compared to Fiscal 2011: The 3.6% increase in revenue was primarily driven by an increase in same store sales and an additional week in fiscal 2012. The increase in same store sales was driven by the positive impact of our wellness + loyalty program, our flu immunization program and other management initiatives to increase sales and prescriptions. These increases were partially offset due to lower pharmacy reimbursement rates and by operating fewer stores than last year. Same store sales trends for fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011 are described in the following paragraphs. Pharmacy same store sales increased 2.4%. Pharmacy same store sales were positively impacted by an increase of 0.9% in same store prescriptions driven in part by our immunization program, our wellness + loyalty program and inflation on brand drugs. Same store sales were also positively impacted by incremental prescriptions from the Walgreens / Express Scripts dispute and other initiatives to increase prescription count, partially offset by an approximate 1.7% negative impact from new generic introductions and lower reimbursement rates from pharmacy benefit managers and government payors. Front end same store sales increased 1.1% from the prior year reflecting the positive impact of our wellness + program and other management initiatives to increase sales in the front end. Costs and Expenses Costs of goods sold . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gross profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gross margin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Selling, general and administrative Year Ended March 2, 2013 March 3, 2012 (52 Weeks) (53 Weeks) February 26, 2011 (52 Weeks) (Dollars in thousands) $18,073,987 7,318,276 $19,327,887 6,793,335 $18,522,403 6,692,504 28.8% 26.0% 26.5% expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 6,600,765 $ 6,531,411 $ 6,457,833 Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues 26.0% 25.0% 25.6% Lease termination and impairment charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loss on debt retirements, net . . . . . . . . Gain on sale of assets, net . . . . . . . . . . 70,859 515,421 140,502 (16,776) 100,053 529,255 33,576 (8,703) 210,893 547,581 44,003 (22,224) Cost of Goods Sold Gross profit increased by $524.9 million in fiscal 2013 compared to fiscal 2012. The overall increase in gross profit was due to a LIFO credit resulting from significant generic deflation this year, compared to a LIFO charge in the prior year and an overall increase in pharmacy gross profit, partially offset by a slightly lower front end gross profit. Overall gross margin was 28.8% for fiscal 2013 compared to 26.0% in fiscal 2012. Pharmacy gross profit was higher due an increased number of prescriptions driven, in part, from the Walgreens / Express Scripts dispute, higher immunizations and our wellness + loyalty program. 29 Additionally, pharmacy gross margin improved due to significant recent generic introductions, partially offset by continued reimbursement rate pressure. Front end gross profit was slightly lower due to higher tier discounts from our wellness + customer loyalty program and other markdowns, partially offset by increased sales. Front end gross margin was flat to the prior year. Gross profit increased by $100.8 million in fiscal 2012 compared to fiscal 2011 due to overall revenue growth. Pharmacy gross profit was higher due to increased prescription volume and the introduction of new generics including generic Lipitor, partially offset by continued pressure on pharmacy benefit manager and governmental reimbursement rates. Front-end gross profit was driven by higher sales reflecting the positive impact of our wellness + loyalty program and continued strong Rite Aid Brand private label penetration. We use the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method of inventory valuation, which is determined annually when inflation rates and inventory levels are finalized. Therefore, LIFO costs for interim period financial statements are estimated. The LIFO credit for fiscal 2013 was $147.9 million compared to a LIFO charge of $188.7 million in fiscal 2012 and $44.9 million in fiscal 2011. The LIFO credit for fiscal 2013 was primarily the result of significant generic drug deflation partially offset by normal inflation on brand drugs and front end products. During fiscal 2013, we experienced significant price decreases on the recent high volume generic introductions. During the first few months after new generic drugs are introduced, supplier prices tend to decrease as multiple suppliers enter the market place. The resulting impact was an approximate 42% decline in our generic product price index this year compared to approximately 6% last year. This significant generic deflation was partially offset by our branded product inflation of approximately 12%, resulting in a net deflation rate of approximately 9% in our overall pharmacy product mix in fiscal 2013, resulting in the LIFO credit noted above. During fiscal 2012, we experienced significant brand price inflation of approximately 12%. Brand pharmacy prices increased by approximately 2% more than in fiscal 2011. We did not yet experience the significant generic deflation impact described above. As a result, inflation on our overall pharmacy product mix was 5% and we incurred the significant LIFO charge noted above. The charge in fiscal 2012 was higher than fiscal 2011 due to the 2% higher branded product inflation rates. Selling, General and Administrative Expenses SG&A expenses increased by $69.4 million in fiscal 2013 compared to fiscal 2012 due primarily to the reversal of $91.3 million of tax indemnification asset resulting from our settlement with the IRS and certain states associated with pre-acquisition Brooks Eckerd tax issues, which are offset by an income tax benefit as noted below (in ‘‘Income Taxes’’), litigation charges relating to the settlement of certain labor related actions and increased associate bonus expense. These amounts are partially offset by lower operating costs associated with one less week this year, lower depreciation and amortization, lower self insurance expense due primarily to the impact of the discount rate change on the prior year expense and the favorable settlement related to payment card interchange fee litigation. SG&A expenses as a percentage of revenue was 26.0% in fiscal 2013 compared to 25.0% in fiscal 2012. The increase in SG&A as a percentage of revenues relative to the prior year is due in part to the continued impact of recent generic introductions and reimbursement rate pressures which has resulted in a lower revenue base to measure our SG&A expenses against. SG&A expenses increased by $73.6 million in fiscal 2012 compared to fiscal 2011 due mostly to expenses associated with the fifty-third week in fiscal 2012. SG&A as a percentage of revenue improved over fiscal 2011 due to leveraging our fixed costs relative to revenue growth. SG&A for fiscal 2012 was 25.0% as a percentage of revenue, compared to 25.6% in fiscal 2011. The decrease in SG&A as a percentage of revenues is mostly due to a decrease in salaries and benefits resulting from continued labor control initiatives, lower occupancy and lower depreciation and amortization, and other cost 30 containment initiatives. These favorable variances were partially offset by an increase in bonus expense relating to improved results and higher workers’ compensation costs associated with unfavorable discount rate changes. Lease Termination and Impairment Charges Impairment Charges: We evaluate long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that an asset group has a carrying value that may not be recoverable. The individual operating store is the lowest level for which cash flows are identifiable. As such, we evaluate individual stores for recoverability of assets. To determine if a store needs to be tested for recoverability, we consider items such as decreases in market prices, changes in the manner in which the store is being used or physical condition, changes in legal factors or business climate, an accumulation of losses significantly in excess of budget, a current period operating or cash flow loss combined with a history of operating or cash flow losses or a projection of continuing losses, or an expectation that the store will be closed or sold. We monitor new and recently relocated stores against operational projections and other strategic factors such as regional economics, new competitive entries and other local market considerations to determine if an impairment evaluation is required. For other stores, we perform a recoverability analysis if they have experienced current-period and historical cash flow losses. In performing the recoverability test, we compare the expected future cash flows of a store to the carrying amount of its assets. Significant judgment is used to estimate future cash flows. Major assumptions that contribute to our future cash flow projections include expected sales, gross profit, and distribution expenses; expected costs such as payroll, occupancy costs and advertising expenses; and estimates for other significant selling, and general and administrative expenses. Many long-term macro- economic and industry factors are considered, both quantitatively and qualitatively, in our future cash flow assumptions. In addition to current and expected economic conditions such as inflation, interest and unemployment rates that affect customer shopping patterns, we consider that we operate in a highly competitive industry which includes the actions of other national and regional drugstore chains, independently owned drugstores, supermarkets, mass merchandisers, dollar stores and internet pharmacies. Many of our competitors are spending significant capital and promotional dollars in certain geographies to gain market share. We have assumed certain sales growth from our loyalty program and other initiatives to grow sales. Recent Pharmacy Benefit Management consolidation and efforts of third party public and private payors have reduced pharmacy reimbursement rates in recent years. We expect this rate compression, which currently affects over 96% of our pharmacy business, to continue to affect us in the foreseeable future. We operate in a highly regulated industry and must make assumptions related to Federal and State efforts and proposals to affect the pricing and regulations related to prescription drugs, as well as, expected revenues and costs related to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (health care reform). Additionally, we take into consideration that certain operating stores are executing specific improvement plans which are monitored quarterly to recoup recent capital investments, such as an acquisition of an independent pharmacy, which we have made to respond to specific competitive or local market conditions, or have specific programs tailored towards a specific geography or market. We recorded impairment charges of $24.9 million in fiscal 2013, $52.0 million in fiscal 2012 and $115.1 million in fiscal 2011. Our methodology for recording impairment charges has not changed materially, and has been consistently applied in the periods presented. At March 2, 2013, approximately $1.9 billion of our long-lived assets, including intangible assets, were associated with 4,623 active operating stores. 31 If an operating store’s estimated future undiscounted cash flows are not sufficient to cover its carrying value, its carrying value is reduced to fair value which is its estimated future discounted cash flows. The discount rate is commensurate with the risks associated with the recovery of a similar asset. An impairment charge is recorded in the period that the store does not meet its original return on investment and/or has an operating loss for the last two years and its projected cash flows do not exceed its current asset carrying value. The amount of the impairment charge is the entire difference between the current carrying asset value and the estimated fair value of the assets using discounted future cash flows. Most stores are fully impaired in the period that the impairment charge is originally recorded. We recorded impairment charges for active stores of $24.0 million in fiscal 2013, $43.4 million in fiscal 2012 and $109.0 million in fiscal 2011. We review key performance results for active stores on a quarterly basis and approve certain stores for closure. Impairment for closed stores, if any (many stores are closed on lease expiration), are recorded in the quarter the closure decision is made and approved. Closure decisions are made on an individual store or regional basis considering all of the macro-economic, industry and other factors discussed above, in addition to, the operating store’s individual operating results. We currently have no plans to close a significant number of active stores in future periods. In the next fiscal year, we currently expect to close fewer than 50 stores, primarily as a result of lease expirations. We recorded impairment charges for closed facilities of $0.9 million in fiscal 2013, $8.6 million in fiscal 2012 and $6.1 million in fiscal 2011. Included in the impairment charges noted above were charges of $0.6 million in fiscal 2013, $5.9 million in fiscal 2012 and $2.4 million in fiscal 2011 for existing owned surplus property. Assets to be disposed of are evaluated quarterly to determine if an additional impairment charge is required. Fair value estimates are provided by independent brokers who operate in the local markets where the assets are located. 32 The following table summarizes the impairment charges and number of locations, segregated by closed facilities and active stores that have been recorded in fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011: Closed facilities: Actual and approved store closings . . . . . . . . . . . Actual and approved relocations . . . . . . . . . . . . . Distribution center closings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Existing surplus properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total impairment charges-closed facilities . . . . . . . . Active stores: Additional current period charges for stores previously impaired in prior periods(1) . . . . . . . Charges for new and relocated stores that did not meet their asset recoverability test in the current period(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Charges for the remaining stores that did not meet their asset recoverability test in the current period(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Year Ended March 2, 2013 March 3, 2012 February 26, 2011 Number Charge Number Charge Number Charge 29 $ — — 5 34 325 — — 594 919 55 $ 2,283 499 2 — — 5,863 12 69 8,645 51 1 1 17 70 $ 3,278 317 94 2,433 6,122 469 5,835 591 9,822 584 17,825 14 9,190 19 18,926 44 36,015 Total impairment charges-active stores . . . . . . . . . . Total impairment charges-all locations . . . . . . . . . . . 23,973 530 564 $24,892 43,353 663 732 $51,998 47 8,948 53 14,605 167 795 865 55,159 108,999 $115,121 Total number of active stores . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,623 Stores impaired in prior periods with no current charge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stores with a current period charge . . . . . . . . . . . . 588 530 Total cumulative active stores with impairment charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,118 4,667 428 663 1,091 4,714 263 795 1,058 (1) These charges are related to stores that were impaired for the first time in prior periods. Most active stores, requiring an impairment charge, are fully impaired in the first period that they do not meet their asset recoverability test. However, in each prior period presented, a minority of stores were partially impaired since their fair value supported a reduced net book value. Accordingly, these stores may be further impaired in the current and future periods as a result of changes in their actual or projected cash flows, or changes to their fair value estimates. Also, we make ongoing capital additions to certain stores to improve their operating results or to meet geographical competition, which if later are deemed to be unrecoverable, will be impaired in future periods. Of this total, 464, 583 and 577 stores for fiscal years 2013, 2012 and 2011 respectively have been fully impaired. (2) These charges are related to new stores (open at least 3 years) and relocated stores (relocated in the last 2 years) that did not meet their recoverability test during the current period. These stores have not met our original return on investment projections and have a historical loss of at least 2 years. Their future cash flow projections do not recover their current carrying value. Of this total, 14, 19 and 43 stores for fiscal years 2013, 2012 and 2011 respectively have been fully impaired. (3) These charges are related to the remaining active stores that did not meet the recoverability test during the current period. These stores have a historical loss of at least 2 years. Their future cash flow projections do not recover their current carrying value. Of this total, 43, 43 and 141 stores for fiscal years 2013, 2012 and 2011 respectively have been fully impaired. 33 The primary drivers of our impairment charges are each store’s current and historical operating performance and the assumptions that we make about each store’s operating performance in future periods. Projected cash flows are updated based on the next year’s operating budget which includes the qualitative factors noted above. We are unable to predict with any degree of certainty which individual stores will fall short or exceed future operating plans. Accordingly, we are unable to describe future trends that would affect our impairment charges, including the likely stores and their related asset values that may fail their recoverability test in future periods. To the extent that actual future cash flows differ from our projections materially, because of the reasons discussed above, certain stores that are either not impaired or partially impaired in the current period may be further impaired in future periods. A 100 basis point decrease in our future sales assumptions as of March 2, 2013 would have resulted in an additional fiscal 2013 impairment charge of $13.0 million. A 100 basis point increase in our future sales assumptions as of March 2, 2013 would have reduced the fiscal 2013 impairment charge by $4.0 million. Changes in our discount rate of 50 basis points would not have a material impact on the total impairment recorded in fiscal 2013. Lease Termination Charges: Charges to close a store, which principally consist of continuing lease obligations, are recorded at the time the store is closed and all inventory is liquidated, pursuant to the guidance set forth in ASC 420, ‘‘Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations.’’ We calculate our liability for closed stores on a store-by-store basis. The calculation includes the discounted effect of future minimum lease payments and related ancillary costs, from the date of closure to the end of the remaining lease term, net of estimated cost recoveries that may be achieved through subletting properties or through favorable lease terminations. We evaluate these assumptions each quarter and adjust the liability accordingly. As part of our ongoing business activities, we assess stores and distribution centers for potential closure. Decisions to close or relocate stores or distribution centers in future periods would result in lease termination charges for lease exit costs and liquidation of inventory, as well as impairment of assets at these locations. In fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011, we recorded lease termination charges of $46.0 million, $48.1 million and $95.8 million. These charges related to changes in future assumptions, interest accretion and provisions for 14 stores in fiscal 2013, 23 stores in fiscal 2012, and 52 stores and one distribution center in fiscal 2011. Interest Expense In fiscal 2013, 2012, and 2011, interest expense was $515.4 million, $529.3 million and $547.6 million, respectively. The reduction in interest expense in fiscal 2013 compared to fiscal 2012 is primarily due to one less week in the current year. The reduction in interest expense in fiscal 2012 compared to fiscal 2011 is primarily due to favorable interest rates resulting from our March 2011 Tranche 3 Term Loan refinancing and the August 2010 refinancing of our Tranche 4 Term Loan partially offset by the impact of the fifty-third week. The annual weighted average interest rates on our indebtedness in fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011 were 7.1%, 7.4% and 7.5%, respectively. Income Taxes Income tax benefit of $110.6 million, income tax benefit of $23.7 million and income tax expense of $9.8 million, has been recorded for fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Net Income for fiscal 2013 included income tax benefit of $110.6 million primarily comprised of adjustments to unrecognized tax benefits for the appellate settlements of the Brooks Eckerd IRS Audit for the fiscal years 2004 - 2007 and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Audit for fiscal years 2005 - 2007 as well as for the lapse of statute of limitations. The appellate settlements as well as the majority of the lapse of statue of limitations is offset by a reversal of the related tax indemnification asset which was recorded 34 in selling, general and administrative expenses as these audits were related to pre-acquisition periods. Additionally, the income tax benefit was recorded net of adjustments to maintain a full valuation allowance against our net deferred tax assets. ASC 740, ‘‘Income Taxes’’ requires a company to evaluate its deferred tax assets on a regular basis to determine if a valuation allowance against the net deferred tax assets is required. In determining whether a valuation allowance is required, we take into account all available positive and negative evidence with regard to the recognition of a deferred tax asset including our past earnings history, expected future earnings, the character and jurisdiction of such earnings, unsettled circumstances that, if unfavorably resolved, would adversely affect recognition of a deferred tax asset, carryback and carryforward periods, and tax planning strategies that could potentially enhance the likelihood of realization of a deferred tax asset. A cumulative loss in recent years is significant negative evidence in considering whether deferred tax assets are realizable. Based on the negative evidence, ASC 740 precludes relying on projections of future taxable income to support the recognition of deferred tax assets. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the existence of sufficient taxable income generated in the carryforward periods. The fiscal 2012 income tax benefit of $23.7 million was primarily comprised of adjustments to unrecognized tax benefits due to the lapse of statute of limitations. The fiscal 2011 income tax expense of $9.8 million was primarily comprised of an accrual for state and local taxes, adjustments to unrecognized tax benefits and the need for an accrual of additional state taxes resulting from the receipt of a final audit determination. We monitor all available evidence related to our ability to utilize our remaining net deferred tax assets. We maintained a full valuation allowance of $2,224.0 million and $2,317.4 million against remaining net deferred tax assets at fiscal year end 2013 and 2012, respectively. Dilutive Equity Issuances On March 2, 2013, 904.3 million shares of common stock, which includes unvested restricted shares, were outstanding and an additional 138.9 million shares of common stock were issuable related to outstanding stock options, convertible preferred stock and convertible notes. On March 2, 2013, our 138.9 million shares of potentially issuable common stock consisted of the following (shares in thousands): Strike price Outstanding Stock Options(a) Preferred Stock Convertible Notes $0.99 and under . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1.00 to $1.99 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2.00 to $2.99 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $3.00 to $3.99 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $4.00 to $4.99 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $5.00 to $5.99 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $6.00 and over . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total issuable shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,116 61,998 149 629 2,910 1,016 2,182 81,000 — — — — — 33,109 — 33,109 — — 24,800 — — — — 24,800 Total 12,116 61,998 24,949 629 2,910 34,125 2,182 138,909 (a) The exercise of these options would provide cash of $119.8 million. Liquidity and Capital Resources General We have two primary sources of liquidity: (i) cash provided by operating activities and (ii) borrowings under the revolving credit facility of our senior secured credit facility. Our principal uses 35 of cash are to provide working capital for operations, to service our obligations to pay interest and principal on debt and to fund capital expenditures. Total liquidity as of March 2, 2013 was $1,031.2 million, which consisted of revolver borrowing capacity of $1,015.0 million and invested cash of $16.2 million. Credit Facility In February 2013, we amended and restated our existing senior secured revolving credit facility, entered into a new $1.161 billion Tranche 6 Term Loan due 2020 under our senior secured credit facility and entered into a new $470.0 million Tranche 1 Term Loan due 2020 under our new second priority secured term loan facility. A portion of the proceeds from these transactions were used to refinance our $1.038 billion Tranche 2 Term Loan due 2014 and our $331.7 million Tranche 5 Term Loan due 2018. As amended and restated, our senior secured credit facility consists of a $1.795 billion revolving credit facility and a $1.161 billion Tranche 6 Term Loan. Borrowings under the revolving credit facility bear interest from February 21, 2013 through May 31, 2013 at a rate per annum of LIBOR plus 2.50%, if we choose to make LIBOR borrowings, or Citibank’s base rate plus 1.50%, and thereafter at a rate per annum between LIBOR plus 2.25% and LIBOR plus 2.75%, if we choose to make LIBOR borrowings, or between Citibank’s base rate plus 1.25% and Citibank’s base rate plus 1.75% in each case based upon the amount of revolver availability as defined in the senior secured credit facility. We are required to pay fees between 0.375% and 0.50% per annum on the daily unused amount of the revolver, depending on the amount of revolver availability. Amounts drawn under the revolver become due and payable on February 21, 2018, provided that such maturity date shall be accelerated to ninety-one days prior to the maturity of our 7.5% senior secured notes due 2017, in the event that we do not repay or refinance such notes on or prior to such date, or ninety-one days prior to the maturity of our 9.5% senior notes due 2017, in the event that we do not repay or refinance such notes on or prior to such date. Our ability to borrow under the revolver is based upon a specified borrowing base consisting of accounts receivable, inventory and prescription files. At March 2, 2013, we had $665.0 million of borrowings outstanding under the revolver and had letters of credit outstanding against the revolver of $115.0 million, which resulted in additional borrowing capacity of $1,015.0 million. The credit facility also includes our $1.161 billion senior secured term loan (the ‘‘Tranche 6 Term Loan’’). The Tranche 6 Term Loan matures on February 21, 2020 and currently bears interest at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus 3.00% with a LIBOR floor of 1.00%, if we choose to make LIBOR borrowings, or at Citibank’s base rate plus 2.00%. We must make mandatory prepayments of the Tranche 6 Term Loan with the proceeds of certain asset dispositions and casualty events (subject to certain limitations), and with the proceeds of certain issuances of debt (subject to certain exceptions); provided that no such prepayment shall be required to be made with respect to excess cash flow for the fiscal year ended March 2, 2013. If at any time there is a shortfall in our borrowing base under our senior secured credit facility, prepayment of the Tranche 6 Term Loan may also be required. The senior secured credit facility restricts us and the subsidiary guarantors from accumulating cash on hand in excess of $200.0 million at any time when revolving loans are outstanding (not including cash located in our store deposit accounts, cash necessary to cover our current liabilities and certain other exceptions) and from accumulating cash on hand with revolver borrowings in excess of $100.0 million over three consecutive business days. The senior secured credit facility also states that if at any time (other than following the exercise of remedies or acceleration of any senior obligations or second priority debt and receipt of a triggering notice by the senior collateral agent from a representative of the senior obligations or the second priority debt) either (a) an event of default exists under our senior secured credit facility or (b) the sum of revolver availability under our senior secured 36 credit facility and certain amounts held on deposit with the senior collateral agent in a concentration account is less than $100.0 million for three consecutive business days (a ‘‘cash sweep period’’), the funds in our deposit accounts will be swept to a concentration account with the senior collateral agent and will be applied first to repay outstanding revolving loans under the senior secured credit facility, and then held as collateral for the senior obligations until such cash sweep period is rescinded pursuant to the terms of our senior secured credit facility. The senior secured credit facility allows us to have outstanding, at any time, up to $1.5 billion in secured second priority debt and unsecured debt in addition to borrowings under the senior secured credit facility and existing indebtedness, provided that not in excess of $750.0 million of such secured second priority debt and unsecured debt shall mature or require scheduled payments of principal prior to May 21, 2020. The senior secured credit facility allows us to incur an unlimited amount of unsecured debt with a maturity beyond May 21, 2020; however, other outstanding indebtedness limits the amount of unsecured debt that can be incurred if certain interest coverage levels are not met at the time of incurrence of said debt or other exemptions are not available. The senior secured credit facility also contains certain restrictions on the amount of secured first priority debt we are able to incur. The senior secured facility also allows, so long as the senior secured credit facility is not in default and we maintain availability on the revolving credit facility of more than $100.0 million, for the voluntary repurchase of any debt and the mandatory repurchase of our 8.5% convertible notes due 2015. Our senior secured credit facility contains covenants which place restrictions on the incurrence of debt beyond the restrictions described above, the payment of dividends, sale of assets, mergers and acquisitions and the granting of liens. Our credit facility also has one financial covenant, which is the maintenance of a fixed charge coverage ratio. The covenant requires that, if availability on the revolving credit facility is less than $150.0 million, we maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.00 to 1.00. As of March 2, 2013, we were in compliance with this financial covenant. The senior secured credit facility provides for customary events of default including nonpayment, misrepresentation, breach of covenants and bankruptcy. It is also an event of default if we fail to make any required payment on debt having a principal amount in excess of $50.0 million or any event occurs that enables, or which with the giving of notice or the lapse of time would enable, the holder of such debt to accelerate the maturity or require the repurchase of such debt. The mandatory repurchase of the 8.5% convertible notes due 2015 is excluded from this event of default. On February 21, 2013, we executed a credit agreement governing a new second priority secured term loan facility, which includes our second priority secured term loan (the ‘‘Tranche 1 Term Loan’’). The Tranche 1 Term Loan matures on August 21, 2020 and currently bears interest at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus 4.75% with a LIBOR floor of 1.00%, if we choose to make LIBOR borrowings, or at Citibank’s base rate plus 3.75%. The second priority secured term loan facility and the indentures that govern our secured and guaranteed unsecured notes contain restrictions on the amount of additional secured and unsecured debt that can be incurred by us. As of March 2, 2013, the amount of additional secured debt that could be incurred under the second priority secured term loan facility and these indentures was approximately $1.1 billion (which amount does not include the ability to enter into certain sale and leaseback transactions). However, we currently cannot incur any additional secured debt assuming a fully drawn revolver and the outstanding letters of credit. The ability to issue additional unsecured debt under these indentures is generally governed by an interest coverage ratio test. As of March 2, 2013, we had the ability to issue additional unsecured debt under the second lien credit facility and other indentures. Other 2013 Transactions In February 2013, we used a portion of the proceeds from the Tranche 6 Term Loan, the proceeds from our Tranche 1 Second Lien Term Loan, borrowings under our revolving credit facility and 37 available cash to repurchase and repay all of our outstanding $410.0 million aggregate principal of 9.750% senior secured notes due 2016, $470.0 million aggregate principal of 10.375% senior secured notes due 2016 and $180.3 million aggregate principal amount of 6.875% senior debentures due 2013. In February 2013, $257.3 million aggregate principal amount of the 9.750% notes, $402.0 million aggregate principal amount of the 10.375% notes and $119.1 million aggregate principal amount of the 6.875% debentures, respectively, were tendered and repurchased by us. We redeemed the remaining 9.750% notes and 10.375% notes for $171.4 million and $72.9 million, respectively, which included the call premium and interest through the redemption date. Additionally, we discharged the remaining 6.875% debentures for $63.4 million, which included interest through maturity. These 9.750% notes, 10.375% notes and 6.875% debentures were satisfied and discharged as of February 21, 2013. In February 2013, we also used available cash to redeem our $6.0 million aggregate principal amount of 9.25% senior notes due 2013 at par for $6.1 million, which included interest through the redemption date. In connection with the above transactions, we recorded a loss on debt retirement of $122.7 million during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013 due to the incurrence of tender and call premiums and interest to maturity of $62.9 million, unamortized original issuance discount of $24.3 million and unamortized debt issue costs of $35.5 million. In February 2012, we issued $481.0 million of our 9.25% senior notes due March 2020 and in May 2012, we issued an additional $421.0 million of our 9.25% senior notes due 2020. The proceeds of the notes, together with available cash, were used to repurchase and repay the 8.625% senior notes due 2015 and the 9.375% senior notes due 2015, respectively. These notes are unsecured, unsubordinated obligations of Rite Aid Corporation and rank equally in right of payment with all other unsubordinated indebtedness. Our obligations under the notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally, on an unsecured unsubordinated basis, by all of our subsidiaries that guarantee our obligations under our senior secured credit facility, our second priority secured term loan facility and our outstanding 8.00% senior secured notes due 2020, 7.5% senior secured notes due 2017, 10.25% senior secured notes due 2019 and 9.5% senior notes due 2017. In May 2012, $296.3 million aggregate principal amount of the outstanding 9.375% notes were tendered and repurchased by us. We redeemed the remaining 9.375% notes in June 2012 for $108.7 million, which included the call premium and interest through the redemption date. The refinancing resulted in an aggregate loss on debt retirement of $17.8 million. 2012 Transactions In February 2012, $404.8 million aggregate principal amount of the outstanding 8.625% notes were tendered and repurchased by us. We redeemed the remaining 8.625% notes in March 2012 for $55.6 million, which included the call premium and interest through the redemption date. The refinancing resulted in an aggregate loss on debt retirement of $16.1 million recorded in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012. During August 2011, we repurchased $41.0 million of our 8.625% notes, $5.0 million of our 9.375% notes and $4.5 million of our 6.875% debentures. These repurchases resulted in a gain for the period of $5.0 million. 2011 Transactions In August 2010, we issued $650.0 million of our 8.00% senior secured notes due August 2020. These notes are unsecured, unsubordinated obligations of Rite Aid Corporation and rank equally in right of payment with all other unsubordinated indebtedness. Our obligations under these notes are guaranteed, subject to certain limitations, by the same subsidiaries that guarantee the obligations under 38 the senior secured credit facility. These guarantees are shared, on a senior basis, with debt outstanding under the senior secured credit facility. The indenture that governs the 8.00% notes contains covenant provisions that, among other things, allow the holders of the notes to participate along with the term loan holders in the mandatory prepayments resulting from the proceeds of certain asset dispositions (at the option of the noteholder) and include limitations on our ability to pay dividends, make investments or other restricted payments, incur debt, grant liens, sell assets and enter into sale-leaseback transactions. In July 2010, we repurchased $93.8 million of our $158.0 million outstanding 8.5% convertible notes. The remaining 8.5% convertible notes require us to maintain a listing on the NYSE or certain other exchanges. In the event of a NYSE delisting, holders of these notes could require us to repurchase them, which we have the ability to do under the terms of our senior secured credit facility. We are currently in compliance with all NYSE listing rules. As of March 2, 2013, we had no material off balance sheet arrangements, other than operating leases included in the table below. Contractual Obligations and Commitments The following table details the maturities of our indebtedness and lease financing obligations as of March 2, 2013, as well as other contractual cash obligations and commitments. Payment due by period Less Than 1 Year 1 to 3 Years 3 to 5 Years After 5 Years Total (Dollars in thousands) Contractual Cash Obligations Long term debt(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Capital lease obligations(2) . . . . . . . . Operating leases(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . Open purchase orders . . . . . . . . . . . Redeemable preferred stock(4) . . . . . Other, primarily self insurance and retirement plan obligations(5) . . . . Minimum purchase commitments(6) . $ 381,910 32,992 997,548 406,642 — $1,484,081 43,002 1,864,407 — — $1,978,876 33,249 1,589,800 — — $4,772,642 45,949 3,820,698 — 21,300 $ 8,617,509 155,192 8,272,453 406,642 21,300 105,907 159,679 126,173 295,333 33,711 259,746 72,784 258,043 338,575 972,801 Total contractual cash obligations . $2,084,678 $3,812,996 $3,895,382 $8,991,416 $18,784,472 Commitments Lease guarantees(7) . . . . . . . . . . . . . Outstanding letters of credit . . . . . . . $ 26,703 99,695 $ 51,641 15,275 $ 42,181 — $ 33,806 — $ 154,331 114,970 Total commitments . . . . . . . . . . . . $2,211,076 $3,879,912 $3,937,563 $9,025,222 $19,053,773 (1) Includes principal and interest payments for all outstanding debt instruments. Interest was calculated on variable rate instruments using rates as of March 2, 2013. (2) Represents the minimum lease payments on non-cancelable leases, including interest, but net of sublease income. (3) Represents the minimum lease payments on non-cancelable leases, including interest, but net of sublease income. (4) Represents value of redeemable preferred stock at its redemption date. 39 (5) Includes the undiscounted payments for self-insured medical coverage, actuarially determined undiscounted payments for self-insured workers’ compensation and general liability, and actuarially determined obligations for defined benefit pension and nonqualified executive retirement plans. (6) Represents commitments to purchase products and licensing fees from certain vendors. (7) Represents lease guarantee obligations for 120 former stores related to certain business dispositions. The respective purchasers assume the obligations and are, therefore, primarily liable for these obligations. Obligations for income tax uncertainties pursuant to ASC 740, ‘‘Income Taxes’’ of approximately $14.7 million are not included in the table above as we are uncertain as to if or when such amounts may be settled. Net Cash Provided By (Used In) Operating, Investing and Financing Activities Cash flow provided by operating activities was $819.6 million in fiscal 2013. Cash flow was positively impacted by net income and a reduction of inventory resulting primarily from recent generic introductions, generic price reductions, management initiatives to reduce inventory levels and fewer open stores, and a reduction of accounts receivable due to the timing of payments from third party payors. Cash flow provided by operating activities was $266.5 million in fiscal 2012. Cash flow was positively impacted by the reduction in net loss, an increase in accounts payable due to the timing of purchases partially offset by an increase in inventory resulting primarily from price inflation and increased store inventory to support sales growth. Cash flow provided by operating activities was $395.8 million in fiscal 2011. Cash flow was positively impacted by a reduction in inventory and an increase in accounts payable due to the timing of purchases. Additionally, the reductions in accounts receivable were no longer offset by repayments to the receivables securitization facility which was eliminated in the third quarter of fiscal 2010. Cash used in investing activities was $346.3 million in fiscal 2013. Cash was used for the purchase of property, plant and equipment and prescriptions files which was partially offset by proceeds from asset dispositions and sale-leaseback transactions. Cash used in investing activities was $221.2 million in fiscal 2012. Cash was used for the purchase of property, plant and equipment and prescription files which was partially offset by proceeds from asset dispositions and sale-leaseback transactions. Cash used in investing activities was $156.7 million in fiscal 2011. Cash was used for the purchase of property, plant and equipment and prescription files which was partially offset by proceeds from asset dispositions. Cash used in financing activities was $506.1 million in fiscal 2013 and was primarily due to the issuance of our $1,161.0 million Tranche 6 Term Loan due 2020, $470.0 million Tranche 1 Term Loan due 2020 and $426.3 million of our 9.25% Senior Notes due 2020, along with borrowings under our revolving credit facility of $685.0 million. Proceeds from these issuances were used to repay our $1,036.3 million Tranche 2 Term Loan due 2014, $470.0 million of our 10.375% Senior Secured Notes due 2016, $410.0 million of our 9.750% Senior Secured Notes due 2016, our $330.9 million Tranche 5 Term Loan due 2018, $405.0 million of our 9.375% Senior Notes due 2015, $54.2 million of our 8.625% Senior Notes due 2015, 6.0 million of our 9.25% Senior Notes due 2013. We also made scheduled payments of $18.5 million and $9.0 million of our capital lease obligations and our Tranche 2 and Tranche 5 Term Loans, respectively. Additionally, we incurred financing fees for early debt retirement of $75.4 million and cash paid for deferred financing costs of $54.8 million in connection with the above transactions. 40 Cash provided by financing activities was $25.8 million in fiscal 2012 and was primarily due to increased revolver borrowings coupled with the February 2012 issuance of $481.0 million of our 9.25% senior notes due March 15, 2020 and concurrent repurchase of $404.8 million of our 8.625% senior notes due March 2015. The remaining $54.2 million of the 8.625% senior notes due March 2015 were repurchased in March 2012. Cash used in financing activities was $251.7 million in fiscal 2011 and was primarily due to the refinancing activity that occurred during the second quarter of fiscal 2011, the repurchase of $93.8 million of the Convertible Notes, other scheduled debt repayments and a small decrease in our zero balance cash accounts. Capital Expenditures During the fifty-two week period ended March 2, 2013, we spent $383.0 million on capital expenditures, consisting of $200.1 million related to new store construction, store relocation and store remodel projects, $115.8 million related to technology enhancements, improvements to distribution centers and other corporate requirements, and $67.1 million related to the purchase of prescription files from other retail pharmacies. We plan on making total capital expenditures of approximately $400.0 million during fiscal 2014, consisting of approximately 55% related to store relocations and remodels and new store construction, 29% related to infrastructure and maintenance requirements and 16% related to prescription file purchases. We expect that these capital expenditures will be financed primarily with cash flow from operating activities. Future Liquidity We are highly leveraged. Our high level of indebtedness could: (i) limit our ability to obtain additional financing; (ii) limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry; (iii) place us at a competitive disadvantage relative to our competitors with less debt; (iv) render us more vulnerable to general adverse economic and industry conditions; and (v) require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow to service our debt. Based upon our current levels of operations, we believe that cash flow from operations together with available borrowings under the senior secured revolving credit facility and other sources of liquidity will be adequate to meet our requirements for working capital, debt service and capital expenditures at least for the next twelve months. Based on our liquidity position, which we expect to remain strong throughout the year, we do not expect the restriction on our senior secured credit facility, that could result if we fail to meet the fixed charge covenant in our senior secured credit facility, to impact our business in the next twelve months. We will continue to assess our liquidity position and potential sources of supplemental liquidity in light of our operating performance, and other relevant circumstances. It is our belief that although it is not likely, should we determine, at any time, that it is necessary to obtain additional short-term liquidity, we will evaluate our alternatives and take appropriate steps to obtain sufficient additional funds. There can be no assurance that any such supplemental funding, if sought, could be obtained or if obtained, would be on terms acceptable to us. From time to time, we may seek deleveraging transactions, including entering into transactions to exchange debt for shares of common stock, issuance of equity (including preferred stock and convertible securities), repurchase outstanding indebtedness, or seek to refinance our outstanding debt or may otherwise seek transactions to reduce interest expense and extend debt maturities. Any of these transactions could impact our financial results. 41 Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to inventory shrink, impairment of long-lived assets, revenue recognition, self insurance liabilities, lease exit liabilities, income taxes and litigation. We base our estimates on historical experience, current and anticipated business conditions, the condition of the financial markets and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under existing conditions. Variability reflected in the sensitivity analyses presented below is based on our recent historical experience. Actual results may differ materially from these estimates and sensitivity analyses. The following critical accounting policies require the use of significant judgments and estimates by management: Inventory shrink: The carrying value of our inventory is reduced by a reserve for estimated shrink losses that occur between physical inventory dates. When estimating these losses, we consider historical loss results at specific locations, as well as overall loss trends as determined during physical inventory procedures. The estimated shrink rate is calculated by dividing historical shrink results for stores inventoried in the most recent six months by the sales for the same period. Shrink expense is recognized by applying the estimated shrink rate to sales since the last physical inventory. There have been no significant changes in the assumptions used to calculate our shrink rate over the last three years. Although possible, we do not expect a significant change to our shrink rate in future periods. A 10 basis point difference in our estimated shrink rate for the year ended March 2, 2013, would have affected pre-tax income by approximately $9.1 million. Impairment of long-lived assets: We evaluate long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that an asset group has a carrying value that may not be recoverable. The individual operating store is the lowest level for which cash flows are identifiable. As such, we evaluate individual stores for recoverability. To determine if a store needs to be tested for recoverability, we consider items such as decreases in market prices, changes in the manner in which the store is being used or physical condition, changes in legal factors or business climate, an accumulation of losses significantly in excess of budget, a current period operating or cash flow loss combined with a history of operating or cash flow losses or a projection of continuing losses, or an expectation that the store will be closed or sold. We monitor new and recently relocated stores against operational projections and other strategic factors such as regional economics, new competitive entries and other local market considerations to determine if an impairment evaluation is required. For other stores, we perform a recoverability analysis if they have experienced current-period and historical cash flow losses. In performing the recoverability test, we compare the expected future cash flows of a store to the carrying amount of its assets. Significant judgment is used to estimate future cash flows. Major assumptions that contribute to our future cash flow projections include expected sales and gross profit; expected costs such as payroll, occupancy costs and advertising expenses; and estimates for other significant selling, general and administrative expenses. If an operating store’s estimated future undiscounted cash flows are not sufficient to cover its carrying value, its carrying value is reduced to fair value which is its estimated future discounted cash flows. The discount rate is commensurate with the risks associated with the recovery of a similar asset. We regularly approve certain stores for closure. Impairment charges for closed stores, if any, are evaluated and recorded in the quarter the closure decision is approved. 42 We also evaluate assets to be disposed of on a quarterly basis to determine if an additional impairment charge is required. Fair value estimates are provided by independent brokers who operate in the local markets where the assets are located. If our actual future cash flows differ from our projections materially, certain stores that are either not impaired or partially impaired in the current period may be further impaired in future periods. A 100 basis point decrease in our future sales assumptions as of March 2, 2013 would have resulted in an additional fiscal 2013 impairment charge of $13.0 million. A 100 basis point increase in our future sales assumptions as of March 2, 2013 would have reduced the fiscal 2013 impairment charge by $4.0 million. Changes in our discount rate of 50 basis points would not have a material impact on the total impairment recorded in fiscal 2013. Revenue recognition for our loyalty program: We offer a chain wide customer loyalty program, ‘‘wellness+’’. Members participating in our wellness+ loyalty card program earn points on a calendar year basis for eligible front end merchandise purchases and qualifying prescriptions. One point is awarded for each dollar spent towards front end merchandise and 25 points are awarded for each qualifying prescription. Members reach specific wellness+ tiers based on the points accumulated during the calendar year, which entitle them to certain future discounts and other benefits upon reaching that tier. For example, any customer that reaches 1,000 points in a calendar year achieves the ‘‘Gold’’ tier, enabling the customer to receive a 20% discount on qualifying purchases of front end merchandise for the remaining portion of the calendar year and the next calendar year. There are also similar ‘‘Silver’’ and ‘‘Bronze’’ levels with lower thresholds and benefit levels. As wellness+ customers accumulate points, we defer the value of the points earned as deferred revenue based on the expected usage. The amount deferred is based on historic and projected customer activity (e.g., tier level, spending level). As customers receive discounted front end merchandise, we recognize an allocable portion of the deferred revenue. If the achieved combined Gold, Silver, and Bronze levels differ from the assumptions by 5.0% it would have affected pretax income by $1.3 million. If the assumed spending levels, which are the drivers of future discounts, differ by 5.0% it would have affected pretax income by $1.3 million. Self-insurance liabilities: We expense claims for self-insured workers’ compensation and general liability insurance coverage as incurred including an estimate for claims incurred but not paid. The expense for self-insured workers’ compensation and general liability claims incurred but not paid is determined using several factors, including historical claims experience and development, severity of claims, medical costs and the time needed to settle claims. We discount the estimated expense for workers’ compensation to present value as the time period from incurrence of the claim to final settlement can be several years. We base our estimates for such timing on previous settlement activity. The discount rate is based on the current market rates for Treasury bills that approximate the average time to settle the workers’ compensation claims. These assumptions are updated on an annual basis. A 25 basis point difference in the discount rate for the year ended March 2, 2013, would have affected pretax income by approximately $2.3 million. Lease termination charges: We record reserves for closed stores based on future lease commitments, anticipated ancillary occupancy costs and anticipated future subleases of properties. The reserves are calculated at the individual location level and the assumptions are assessed at that level. The reserve for lease exit liabilities is discounted using a credit adjusted risk free interest rate. Reserve estimates and related assumptions are updated on a quarterly basis. A substantial amount of our closed stores were closed prior to our adoption of ASC 420, ‘‘Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations.’’ Therefore, if interest rates change, reserves may be increased or decreased. In addition, changes in the real estate leasing markets can have an impact on the reserve. As of 43 March 2, 2013, a 50 basis point variance in the credit adjusted risk free interest rate would have affected pretax income by approximately $2.3 million for fiscal 2013. Income taxes: We currently have net operating loss (‘‘NOL’’) carryforwards that can be utilized to offset future income for federal and state tax purposes. These NOLs generate significant deferred tax assets which are currently offset by a valuation allowance. We regularly review the deferred tax assets for recoverability considering the relative impact of negative and positive evidence including our historical profitability, projected taxable income, the expected timing of the reversals of existing temporary differences and tax planning strategies. The weight given to the potential effect of the negative and positive evidence is commensurate with the extent to which it can be objectively verified. We establish a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets when we determine that it is more likely than not that some portion of our deferred tax assets will not be realized. There have been no significant changes in the assumptions used to calculate our valuation allowance over the last three years. However, changes in market conditions and the impact of the acquisition of Brooks Eckerd on operations have caused changes in the valuation allowance from period to period which were included in the tax provision in the period of change. We recognize tax liabilities in accordance with ASC 740, ‘‘Income Taxes’’ and we adjust these liabilities when our judgment changes as a result of the evaluation of new information not previously available. Due to the complexity of some of these uncertainties, the ultimate resolution may result in a payment that is materially different from our current estimate of the tax liabilities. Litigation reserves: We are involved in litigation on an on-going basis. We accrue our best estimate of the probable loss related to legal claims. Such estimates are based upon a combination of litigation and settlement strategies. These estimates are updated as the facts and circumstances of the cases develop and/or change. To the extent additional information arises or our strategies change, it is possible that our best estimate of the probable liability may also change. Changes to these reserves during the last three fiscal years were not material. Adjusted EBITDA and Other Non-GAAP Measures In addition to net income determined in accordance with GAAP, we use certain non-GAAP measures, such as ‘‘Adjusted EBITDA’’, in assessing our operating performance. We believe the non-GAAP metrics serve as an appropriate measure to be used in evaluating the performance of our business. We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss) excluding the impact of income taxes (and any corresponding reduction of tax indemnification asset), interest expense, depreciation and amortization, LIFO adjustments, charges or credits for facility closing and impairment, inventory write- downs related to store closings, stock- based compensation expense, debt retirements, sale of assets and investments, revenue deferrals related to customer loyalty programs and other items. We reference this particular non-GAAP financial measure frequently in our decision-making because it provides supplemental information that facilitates internal comparisons to the historical operating performance of prior periods and external comparisons to competitors’ historical operating performance. In addition, incentive compensation is based on Adjusted EBITDA and we base certain of our forward- looking estimates on Adjusted EBITDA to facilitate quantification of planned business activities and enhance subsequent follow-up with comparisons of actual to planned Adjusted EBITDA. 44 The following is a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to our net income (loss) for fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011: Net income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income tax (benefit) expense . . . . . . . . . . . . Reduction of tax indemnification asset(1) . Depreciation and amortization expense . . . . LIFO (credits) charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lease termination and impairment charges . . Stock-based compensation expense . . . . . . . . Gain on sale of assets, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loss on debt retirements, net . . . . . . . . . . . . Closed facility liquidation expense . . . . . . . . Severance costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Customer loyalty card program revenue deferral . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . March 2, 2013 (52 weeks) March 3, 2012 (53 weeks) February 26, 2011 (52 weeks) $ 118,105 515,421 (110,600) 91,314 414,111 (147,882) 70,859 17,717 (16,776) 140,502 5,272 (72) $(368,571) $(555,424) 547,581 9,842 — 505,546 44,905 210,893 17,336 (22,224) 44,003 9,881 4,883 529,255 (23,686) — 440,582 188,722 100,053 15,861 (8,703) 33,576 6,505 256 26,564 3,844 30,856 (1,804) 41,669 71 Adjusted EBITDA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,128,379 $ 942,902 $ 858,962 (1) Note: The income tax benefit from the IRS settlement described in Footnote 5 in the notes to our consolidated financial statements and the corresponding reduction of the tax indemnification asset had no net effect on Adjusted EBITDA. In addition to Adjusted EBITDA, we occasionally refer to several other Non-GAAP measures, on a less frequent basis, in order to describe certain components of our business and how we utilize them to describe our results. These measures include but are not limited to Adjusted EBITDA Gross Margin and Gross Profit (gross margin/gross profit excluding non-Adjusted EBITDA items), Adjusted EBITDA SG&A (SG&A expenses excluding non-Adjusted EBITDA items), FIFO Gross Margin (gross margin before LIFO charges) and Free Cash Flow (Adjusted EBITDA less cash paid for interest, rent on closed stores, capital expenditures and the change in working capital). We include these non-GAAP financial measures in our earnings announcements and guidance in order to provide transparency to our investors and enable investors to better compare our operating performance with the operating performance of our competitors including with those of our competitors having different capital structures. Adjusted EBITDA or other non-GAAP measures should not be considered in isolation from, and are not intended to represent an alternative measure of, operating results or of cash flows from operating activities, as determined in accordance with GAAP. Our definition of these non-GAAP measures may not be comparable to similarly titled measurements reported by other companies. Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk Our future earnings, cash flow and fair values relevant to financial instruments are dependent upon prevalent market rates. Market risk is the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices and interest rates. Our major market risk exposure is changing interest rates. Increases in interest rates would increase our interest expense. We enter into debt obligations to support capital expenditures, acquisitions, working capital needs and general corporate purposes. Our policy is to manage interest 45 rates through the use of a combination of variable-rate credit facilities, fixed-rate long-term obligations and derivative transactions. We currently do not have any derivative transactions outstanding. The table below provides information about our financial instruments that are sensitive to changes in interest rates. The table presents principal payments and the related weighted average interest rates by expected maturity dates as of March 2, 2013. Long-term debt, including current portion, 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Thereafter Total (Dollars in thousands) Fair Value at March 2, 2013 . excluding capital lease obligations . . . . . . Fixed Rate . . Average Interest Rate . Variable Rate . . Average Interest Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $5,298 $ — $ 64,188 $500,000 $810,000 $2,245,000 $3,624,486 $3,912,903 1.24% 0.0% 8.50% 7.50% 9.50% 8.67% 8.68% $8,708 $11,610 $676,610 $ 11,610 $ 11,610 $1,575,852 $2,296,000 $2,275,694 4.00% 4.00% 2.91% 4.00% 4.00% 4.52% 4.04% Our ability to satisfy interest payment obligations on our outstanding debt will depend largely on our future performance, which, in turn, is subject to prevailing economic conditions and to financial, business and other factors beyond our control. If we do not have sufficient cash flow to service our interest payment obligations on our outstanding indebtedness and if we cannot borrow or obtain equity financing to satisfy those obligations, our business and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. We cannot be assured that any replacement borrowing or equity financing could be successfully completed. The interest rate on our variable rate borrowings, which include our revolving credit facility, our Tranche 6 Term Loan and Tranche 1 Term Loan, are all based on LIBOR. However, the interest rate on our Tranche 6 Term Loan and Tranche 1 Term Loan have a LIBOR floor of 100 basis points. If the market rates of interest for LIBOR changed by 100 basis points as of March 2, 2013, our annual interest expense would change by approximately $16.3 million. A change in interest rates does not have an impact upon our future earnings and cash flow for fixed-rate debt instruments. As fixed-rate debt matures, however, and if additional debt is acquired to fund the debt repayment, future earnings and cash flow may be affected by changes in interest rates. This effect would be realized in the periods subsequent to the periods when the debt matures. Increases in interest rates would also impact our ability to refinance existing maturities on favorable terms. Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto are included elsewhere in this report and are incorporated by reference herein. See Item 15 of Part IV. Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure Not applicable Item 9A. Controls and Procedures (a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the ‘‘Exchange Act’’)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective. 46 (b) Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we have conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in ‘‘Internal Control—Integrated Framework’’ issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, our management has concluded that, as of March 2, 2013, we did not have any material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting and our internal control over financial reporting was effective. Attestation Report of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP, on our internal control over financial reporting is included after the next paragraph. (c) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting There has not been any change in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during our fourth fiscal quarter ended March 2, 2013 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. 47 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Rite Aid Corporation Camp Hill, Pennsylvania We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Rite Aid Corporation and subsidiaries (the ‘‘Company’’) as of March 2, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control— Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company’s board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of March 2, 2013, based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule as of and for the year ended March 2, 2013 of the Company and our report dated April 23, 2013 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and financial statement schedule. /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP Philadelphia, Pennsylvania April 23, 2013 48 Item 9B. Other Information None PART III We intend to file with the SEC a definitive proxy statement for our 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be held on June 20, 2013, pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after March 2, 2013. The information required by Part III (Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14) is incorporated by reference from that proxy statement. Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedule PART IV (a) The consolidated financial statements of the Company and report of the independent registered public accounting firm identified in the following index are included in this report from the individual pages filed as a part of this report: 1. Financial Statements The following financial statements, report of the independent registered public accounting firm and supplementary data are included herein: Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 2, 2013 and March 3, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consolidated Statements of Operations for the fiscal years ended March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012 and February 26, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the fiscal years ended March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012 and February 26, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Deficit for the fiscal years ended March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012 and February 26, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the fiscal years ended March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012 and February 26, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 2. Financial Statement Schedule Schedule II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable, not required or the required information is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto. 49 3. Exhibits Exhibit Numbers 2.1 2.2 2.3 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 Description Incorporation By Reference To Amended and Restated Stockholder Agreement, dated August 23, 2006, amended and restated as of June 4, 2007, between Rite Aid Corporation, The Jean Coutu Group (PJC) Inc., Jean Coutu, Marcelle Coutu, Francois J. Coutu, Michel Coutu, Louis Coutu, Sylvie Coutu and Marie-Josee Coutu Letter Agreement to the Amended and Restated Stockholder Agreement, dated April 20, 2010, by and between Rite Aid Corporation and The Jean Coutu Group (PJC) Inc. Registration Rights Agreement, dated August 23, 2006, between Rite Aid Corporation and The Jean Coutu Group (PJC) Inc. Exhibit 2.2 to Form 10-Q, filed on July 12, 2007 Exhibit 2.2 to Form 10-Q, filed on July 6, 2010 Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K, filed on August 24, 2006 Restated Certificate of Incorporation, dated December 12, 1996 Exhibit 3(i) to Form 8-K, filed on November 2, 1999 Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation, dated February 22, 1999 Exhibit 3(ii) to Form 8-K, filed on November 2, 1999 Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation, dated June 27, 2001 Exhibit 3.4 to Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-64950, filed on July 12, 2001 Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation, dated June 4, 2007 Exhibit 4.4 to Registration Statement on Form S-8, File No. 333-146531, filed on October 5, 2007 Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation, dated June 25, 2009 7% Series G Cumulative Convertible Pay-in-Kind Preferred Stock Certificate of Designation, dated January 28, 2005 6% Series H Cumulative Convertible Pay-in-Kind Preferred Stock Certificate of Designation, dated January 28, 2005 Exhibit 3.5 to Form 10-Q, filed on July 8, 2009 Exhibit 3.2 to Form 8-K, filed on February 2, 2005 Exhibit 3.3 to Form 8-K, filed on February 2, 2005 3.8 Amended and Restated By-Laws Exhibit 3.1 to Form 8-K, filed on January 27, 2010 50 Exhibit Numbers 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 Description Incorporation By Reference To Exhibit 99.1 to Form 8-K, filed on February 26, 2007 Exhibit 4.12 to Form 10-Q, filed on January 9, 2008 Exhibit 4.13 to Form 10-Q, filed on July 10, 2008 Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K, filed on October 29, 2009 Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K, filed on August 19, 2010 Exhibit 4.2 to Form 8-K, filed on June 7, 2007 Indenture, dated as of February 21, 2007, among Rite Aid Corporation, as issuer, the subsidiary guarantors named therein and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, related to the Company’s 7.5% Senior Secured Notes due 2017 Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 4, 2007, among Rite Aid Corporation, the subsidiaries named therein and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A. to the Indenture dated as of February 21, 2007, among Rite Aid Corporation, the subsidiary guarantors named therein and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., related to the Company’s 7.5% Senior Secured Notes due 2017 Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 9, 2008, among Rite Aid Corporation, the subsidiaries named therein and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. to the Indenture dated as of February 21, 2007, among Rite Aid Corporation, the subsidiary guarantors named therein and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., related to the Company’s 7.5% Senior Secured Notes due 2017 Indenture, dated as of October 26, 2009, among Rite Aid Corporation, as issuer, the subsidiary guarantors named therein and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, related to the Company’s 10.25% Senior Secured Notes due 2019 Indenture, dated as of August 16, 2010, among Rite Aid Corporation, as issuer, the subsidiary guarantors named therein and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, related to the Company’s 8.00% Senior Secured Notes due 2020 Amended and Restated Indenture, dated as of June 4, 2007, among Rite Aid Corporation (as successor to Rite Aid Escrow Corp.), as issuer, the subsidiary guarantors named therein and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, related to the Company’s 9.500% Senior Notes due 2017 51 Exhibit Numbers 4.7 4.8 4.9 4.10 4.11 Description Incorporation By Reference To Exhibit 4.20 to Form 10-Q, filed on July 10, 2008 Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K, filed on February 27, 2012 Exhibit 4.23 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4, File No. 181651, filed on May 24, 2012 Exhibit 4A to Registration Statement on Form S-3, File No. 033-63794, filed on June 3, 1993 Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed on February 7, 2000 First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 9, 2008, among Rite Aid Corporation, the subsidiaries named therein and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. to the Amended and Restated Indenture, dated as of June 4, 2007, among Rite Aid Corporation, the subsidiary guarantors named therein and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., related to the Company’s 9.500% Senior Notes due 2017 Indenture, dated as of February 27, 2012, among Rite Aid Corporation, as issuer, the subsidiary guarantors named therein and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, related to the Company’s 9.25% Senior Notes due 2020 First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 15, 2012, among Rite Aid Corporation, the subsidiaries named therein and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. to the Indenture, dated as of February 27, 2012, among Rite Aid Corporation, the subsidiary guarantors named therein and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., related to the Company’s 9.25% Senior Notes due 2020 Indenture, dated as of August 1, 1993, between Rite Aid Corporation, as issuer, and Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York, as trustee, related to the Company’s 7.70% Notes due 2027 and 6.875% Senior Debentures due 2013 Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 3, 2000, between Rite Aid Corporation and U.S. Bank Trust National Association (as successor trustee to Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York) to the Indenture dated as of August 1, 1993, between Rite Aid Corporation and Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York, relating to the Company’s 7.70% Notes due 2027 and 6.875% Senior Debentures due 2013 52 Exhibit Numbers 4.12 4.13 4.14 4.15 4.16 Description Incorporation By Reference To Exhibit 4.3 to Form 8-K, filed on February 21, 2013 Exhibit 4.1 to Registration Statement on Form S-4, File No. 333-74751, filed on March 19, 1999 Exhibit 4.4 to Form 8-K, filed on February 7, 2000 Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K, filed on June 2, 2008 Exhibit 4.2 to Form 8-K, filed on June 2, 2008 Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 21, 2013, between Rite Aid Corporation and U.S. Bank Trust National Association to the Indenture dated as of August 1, 1993, between Rite Aid Corporation and Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York, relating to the Company’s 6.875% Senior Debentures due 2013 Indenture, dated as of December 21, 1998, between Rite Aid Corporation, as issuer, and Harris Trust and Savings Bank, as trustee, related to the Company’s 6.875% Notes due 2028 Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 3, 2000, between Rite Aid Corporation and Harris Trust and Savings Bank to the Indenture, dated December 21, 1998, between Rite Aid Corporation and Harris Trust and Savings Bank, related to the Company’s 6.875% Notes due 2028 Indenture, dated as of May 29, 2008, between Rite Aid Corporation, as issuer, and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, related to the Company’s Senior Debt Securities First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 29, 2008, among Rite Aid Corporation and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A. to the Indenture, dated as of May 29, 2008, between Rite Aid Corporation and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., related to the Company’s 8.5% Convertible Notes due 2015 10.1 1999 Stock Option Plan* 10.2 2000 Omnibus Equity Plan* 10.3 2001 Stock Option Plan* 10.4 2004 Omnibus Equity Plan* 10.5 2006 Omnibus Equity Plan* Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-K, filed on May 21, 2001 Included in Proxy Statement dated October 24, 2000 Exhibit 10.3 to Form 10-K, filed on May 21, 2001 Exhibit 10.4 to Form 10-K, filed on April 28, 2005 Exhibit 10 to Form 8-K, filed on January 22, 2007 53 Exhibit Numbers Description Incorporation By Reference To 10.6 2010 Omnibus Equity Plan* Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K, filed on June 25, 2010 10.7 10.8 Amendment No. 1, dated September 21, 2010, to the 2010 Omnibus Equity Plan* Exhibit 10.7 to Form 10-Q, filed on October 7, 2010 Amendment No. 2, dated January 16, 2013, to the 2010 Omnibus Equity Plan* Filed herewith 10.9 2012 Omnibus Equity Plan* Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K, filed on June 25, 2012 10.10 Amendment No. 1, dated January 16, 2013, to the 2012 Omnibus Equity Plan* Filed herewith 10.11 Form of Award Agreement* 10.12 Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan* Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K, filed on May 15, 2012 Exhibit 10.6 to Form 10-K, filed on April 28, 2010 10.13 10.14 10.15 10.16 10.17 10.18 10.19 10.20 Executive Incentive Plan for Officers of Rite Aid Corporation* Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K, filed on February 24, 2012 Amended and Restated Employment Agreement by and between Rite Aid Corporation and John T. Standley, dated as of January 21, 2010* Employment Agreement by and between Rite Aid Corporation and Frank G. Vitrano, dated as of September 24, 2008* Letter Agreement, dated July 27, 2010, to the Employment Agreement by and between Rite Aid Corporation and Frank G. Vitrano, dated as of September 24, 2008* Employment Agreement by and between Rite Aid Corporation and Marc A. Strassler, dated as of March 9, 2009* Letter Agreement, dated July 27, 2010, to the Employment Agreement by and between Rite Aid Corporation and Marc A. Strassler, dated as of March 9, 2009* Employment Agreement by and between Rite Aid Corporation and Douglas E. Donley, dated as of August 1, 2000* Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement by and between Rite Aid Corporation and Douglas E. Donley, dated as of December 18, 2008* Exhibit 10.7 to Form 10-K, filed on April 28, 2010 Exhibit 10.3 to Form 10-Q, filed on October 8, 2008 Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-Q, filed on October 7, 2010 Exhibit 10.8 to Form 10-K, filed on April 17, 2009 Exhibit 10.4 to Form 10-Q, filed on October 7, 2010 Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q, filed on December 22, 2005 Exhibit 10.4 to Form 10-Q, filed on January 7, 2009 54 Exhibit Numbers 10.21 Description Incorporation By Reference To Rite Aid Corporation Special Executive Retirement Plan* Exhibit 10.15 to Form 10-K, filed on April 26, 2004 Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q, filed on July 12, 2007 Exhibit 10.3 to Form 10-Q, filed on January 7, 2009 Exhibit 10.7 to Form 10-Q, filed on January 7, 2009 Exhibit 10.6 to Form 10-Q, filed on October 7, 2010 Exhibit 10.5 to Form 10-Q, filed on January 6, 2010 Exhibit 10.6 to Form 10-Q, filed on January 6, 2010 Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-Q, filed on October 5, 2011 Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q, filed on October 5, 2011 Exhibit 10.25 to Form 10-K, filed on April 29, 2008 Exhibit 10.26 to Form 10-K, filed on April 29, 2008 Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q, filed on January 7, 2009 10.22 10.23 10.24 10.25 10.26 10.27 10.28 10.29 10.30 10.31 10.32 Employment Agreement by and between Rite Aid Corporation and Brian Fiala, dated as of June 26, 2007* Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement by and between Rite Aid Corporation and Brian Fiala, dated as of December 18, 2008* Employment Agreement by and between Rite Aid Corporation and Ken Martindale, dated as of December 3, 2008* Letter Agreement, dated July 27, 2010, to the Employment Agreement by and between Rite Aid Corporation and Ken Martindale, dated as of December 3, 2008* Employment Agreement by and between Rite Aid Corporation and Robert I. Thompson, dated as of February 3, 2008* Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement by and between Rite Aid Corporation and Robert I. Thompson, dated as of September 23, 2009* Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of July 11, 2011, between Rite Aid Corporation and Robert K. Thompson* Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of June 23, 2011, between Rite Aid Corporation and Enio A. Montini, Jr.* Supply Agreement by and between Rite Aid Corporation and McKesson Corporation, dated as of December 22, 2003** First Amendment to Supply Agreement by and between Rite Aid Corporation and McKesson Corporation, dated as of December 8, 2007** Second Amendment to Supply Agreement by and between Rite Aid Corporation and McKesson Corporation, dated as of November 7, 2008** 55 Description Incorporation By Reference To Exhibit 10.30 to Form 10-K, filed on April 17, 2009 Exhibit 10.4 to Form 10-Q, filed on January 6, 2010 Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q, filed on January 8, 2013 Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-Q, filed on January 8, 2013 Exhibit 10.27 to Form 10-K, filed on April 29, 2008 Exhibit 10.28 to Form 10-K, filed on April 29, 2008 Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K, filed on February 21, 2013 Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K, filed on February 21, 2013 Exhibit Numbers 10.33 10.34 10.35 10.36 Third Amendment to Supply Agreement by and between Rite Aid Corporation and McKesson Corporation, dated as of February 1, 2009** Fourth Amendment to Supply Agreement by and between Rite Aid Corporation and McKesson Corporation, dated as of December 10, 2009** Fifth Amendment to Supply Agreement by and between Rite Aid Corporation and McKesson Corporation, dated as of June 22, 2010 Sixth Amendment to Supply Agreement by and between Rite Aid Corporation and McKesson Corporation, dated as of October 1, 2012** 10.37 Management Services Agreement by and 10.38 10.39 10.40 between Rite Aid Corporation and Leonard Green & Partners, L.P., dated as of January 1, 2003 Fourth Amendment to Management Services Agreement by and between Rite Aid Corporation and Leonard Green & Partners, L.P., dated as of February 12, 2007 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of June 27, 2001, as amended and restated on February 21, 2013, among Rite Aid Corporation, the lenders from time to time party thereto and Citicorp North America, Inc., as administrative agent and collateral agent Credit Agreement, dated as of February 21, 2013, among Rite Aid Corporation, the lenders from time to time party thereto and Citicorp North America, Inc., as administrative agent and collateral agent 56 Exhibit Numbers 10.41 10.42 10.43 10.44 10.45 Description Incorporation By Reference To Exhibit 10.3 to Form 8-K, filed on June 11, 2009 Exhibit 10.4 to Form 8-K, filed on June 11, 2009 Exhibit 10.5 to Form 8-K, filed on June 11, 2009 Exhibit 4.27 to Form 10-K, filed on April 29, 2008 Exhibit 4.36 to Form 10-K, filed on April 17, 2009 Amended and Restated Collateral Trust and Intercreditor Agreement, including the related definitions annex, dated as of June 5, 2009, among Rite Aid Corporation, each subsidiary named therein or which becomes a party thereto, Wilmington Trust Company, as collateral trustee, Citicorp North America, Inc., as senior collateral processing agent, The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee under the 2017 7.5% Note Indenture (as defined therein) and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee under the 2016 10.375% Note Indenture (as defined therein), and each other Second Priority Representative and Senior Representative which becomes a party thereto Amended and Restated Senior Subsidiary Guarantee Agreement, dated as of June 5, 2009 among the subsidiary guarantors party thereto and Citicorp North America, Inc., as senior collateral agent Amended and Restated Senior Subsidiary Security Agreement, dated as of June 5, 2009, by the subsidiary guarantors party thereto in favor of the Citicorp North America, Inc., as senior collateral agent Amended and Restated Senior Indemnity, Subrogation and Contribution Agreement, dated as of May 28, 2003, and supplemented as of September 27, 2004, among Rite Aid Corporation, the Subsidiary Guarantors, and Citicorp North America, Inc. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as collateral processing co-agents Second Priority Subsidiary Guarantee Agreement, dated as of June 27, 2001, as amended and restated as of May 28, 2003, and as supplemented as of January 5, 2005, among the Subsidiary Guarantors and Wilmington Trust Company, as collateral agent 57 Exhibit Numbers 10.46 10.47 10.48 10.49 11 12 21 23 Description Incorporation By Reference To Second Priority Subsidiary Security Agreement, dated as of June 27, 2001, as amended and restated as of May 28, 2003, as supplemented as of January 5, 2005, and as amended in the Reaffirmation Agreement and Amendment dates as of January 11, 2005, by the Subsidiary Guarantors in favor of Wilmington Trust Company, as collateral trustee Amended and Restated Second Priority Indemnity, Subrogation and Contribution Agreement, dated as of May 28, 2003, and as supplemented as of January 5, 2005, among the Subsidiary Guarantors and Wilmington Trust Company, as collateral agent Intercreditor Agreement, dated as of February 18, 2009, by and among Citicorp North America, Inc. and Citicorp North America, Inc., and acknowledged and agreed to by Rite Aid Funding II Senior Lien Intercreditor Agreement dated as of June 12, 2009, among Rite Aid Corporation, the subsidiary guarantors named therein, Citicorp North America, Inc., as senior collateral agent for the Senior Secured Parties (as defined therein), Citicorp North America, Inc., as senior representative for the Senior Loan Secured Parties (as defined therein), The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Senior Representative (as defined therein) for the Initial Additional Senior Debt Parties (as defined therein), and each additional Senior Representative from time to time party thereto Statement regarding computation of earnings per share (See Note 2 to the condensed consolidated financial statements) Exhibit 4.37 to Form 10-K, filed on April 17, 2009 Exhibit 4.33 to Form 10-K, filed on April 29, 2008 Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K, filed on February 20, 2009 Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K, filed on June 16, 2009 Filed herewith Statement regarding computation of ratio of earnings to fixed charges Filed herewith Subsidiaries of the Registrant Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Filed herewith Filed herewith 58 Exhibit Numbers 31.1 31.2 32 101. Description Incorporation By Reference To Filed herewith Filed herewith Filed herewith Certification of CEO pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended Certification of CFO pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended Certification of CEO and CFO pursuant to 18 United States Code, Section 1350, as enacted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 The following materials are formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 2, 2013 and March 3, 2012, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations for the fiscal years ended March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012, and February 26, 2011, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the fiscal years ended March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012, and February 26, 2011, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Deficit for the fiscal years ended March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012 and February 26, 2011, (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow for the fiscal years ended March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012 and February 26, 2011 and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged in detail. * Constitutes a compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed with this Form 10-K. ** Confidential portions of these Exhibits were redacted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to requests for confidential treatment. In reviewing the agreements included as exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K please remember they are included to provide you with information regarding their terms and are not intended to provide any other factual or disclosure information about Rite Aid Corporation, its subsidiaries or the other parties to the agreements. The agreements may contain representations and warranties by each of the parties to the applicable agreement. These representations and warranties have been made solely for the benefit of the other parties to the applicable agreement and: (cid:127) should not in all instances be treated as categorical statements of fact, but rather as a way of allocating the risk to one of the parties if those statements prove to be inaccurate; (cid:127) have been qualified by disclosures that were made to the other party in connection with the negotiation of the applicable agreement, which disclosures are not necessarily reflected in the agreement; 59 (cid:127) may apply standards of materiality in a way that is different from what may be viewed as material to you or other investors; and (cid:127) were made only as of the date of the applicable agreement or such other date or dates as may be specified in the agreement and are subject to more recent developments. Accordingly, these representations and warranties may not describe the actual state of affairs as of the date they were made or at any other time. Additional information about Rite Aid Corporation may be found elsewhere in this report and the Company’s other public filings, which are available without charge through the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. 60 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Rite Aid Corporation Camp Hill, Pennsylvania We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Rite Aid Corporation and subsidiaries (the ‘‘Company’’) as of March 2, 2013 and March 3, 2012, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended March 2, 2013. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a)(2). These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Rite Aid Corporation and subsidiaries as of March 2, 2013 and March 3, 2012, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended March 2, 2013, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein. We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of March 2, 2013, based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated April 23, 2013 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP Philadelphia, Pennsylvania April 23, 2013 61 RITE AID CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (In thousands, except per share amounts) Current assets: ASSETS Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accounts receivable, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inventories, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Prepaid expenses and other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Total current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Property, plant and equipment, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other intangibles, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . March 2, 2013 March 3, 2012 129,452 929,476 3,154,742 195,377 4,409,047 1,895,650 464,404 309,618 $ 162,285 1,013,233 3,138,455 190,613 4,504,586 1,902,021 528,775 428,909 Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 7,078,719 $ 7,364,291 LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT Current liabilities: Current maturities of long-term debt and lease financing obligations . . . . Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued salaries, wages and other current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Total current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long-term debt, less current maturities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lease financing obligations, less current maturities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other noncurrent liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Commitments and contingencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stockholders’ deficit: Preferred stock—series G, par value $1 per share; liquidation value $100 37,311 1,384,644 1,156,315 2,578,270 5,904,370 91,850 963,663 9,538,153 — $ 79,421 1,426,391 1,064,507 2,570,319 6,141,773 107,007 1,131,948 9,951,047 — per share; 2,000 shares authorized; shares issued .007 and .006 . . . . . . . 1 1 Preferred stock—series H, par value $1 per share; liquidation value $100 per share; 2,000 shares authorized; shares issued 1,821 and 1,715 . . . . . 182,097 171,569 Common stock, par value $1 per share; 1,500,000 shares authorized; shares issued and outstanding 904,268 and 898,687 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Additional paid-in capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accumulated deficit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accumulated other comprehensive loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 904,268 4,280,831 (7,765,262) (61,369) 898,687 4,278,988 (7,883,367) (52,634) Total stockholders’ deficit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (2,459,434) (2,586,756) Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 7,078,719 $ 7,364,291 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 62 RITE AID CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (In thousands, except per share amounts) Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Costs and expenses: Cost of goods sold . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Selling, general and administrative expenses . . . . . . . . . . . Lease termination and impairment charges . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loss on debt retirements, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gain on sale of assets, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . March 2, 2013 (52 Weeks) Year Ended March 3, 2012 (53 Weeks) February 26, 2011 (52 Weeks) $25,392,263 $26,121,222 $25,214,907 18,073,987 6,600,765 70,859 515,421 140,502 (16,776) 19,327,887 6,531,411 100,053 529,255 33,576 (8,703) 18,522,403 6,457,833 210,893 547,581 44,003 (22,224) 25,384,758 26,513,479 25,760,489 Income (loss) before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income tax (benefit) expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,505 (110,600) (392,257) (23,686) (545,582) 9,842 Net income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 118,105 $ (368,571) $ (555,424) Computation of income (loss) applicable to common stockholders: Net income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accretion of redeemable preferred stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cumulative preferred stock dividends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income (loss) attributable to common stockholders—basic and diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Basic and diluted income (loss) per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ $ 118,105 (102) (10,528) $ (368,571) $ (555,424) (102) (9,346) (102) (9,919) 107,475 $ (378,592) $ (564,872) 0.12 $ (0.43) $ (0.64) The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 63 RITE AID CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) (In thousands) Net income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other comprehensive (loss) income: Defined benefit pension plans: Amortization of prior service cost, net transition obligation and net actuarial losses included in net periodic pension cost . . . . . Total other comprehensive (loss) income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . March 2, 2013 (52 Weeks) Year Ended March 3, 2012 (53 Weeks) February 26, 2011 (52 Weeks) $118,105 $(368,571) $(555,424) (8,735) (8,735) (22,492) (22,492) 1,178 1,178 Comprehensive income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $109,370 $(391,063) $(554,246) The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 64 RITE AID CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT For the Years Ended March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012 and February 26, 2011 (In thousands) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Preferred Stock—Series G Preferred Stock—Series H Common Stock Shares Amount Shares Amount Shares Amount Additional Paid-In Capital — $1 1,523 $152,304 887,636 $887,636 $4,277,200 Accumulated Deficit $(6,959,372) (555,424) Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) $(31,320) 1,178 (1,103) 3,905 (385) (1,103) 3,905 (385) 244 244 (29) (3,905) 385 6,053 11,283 (18) (9,346) 93 9,346 Total $(1,673,551) (555,424) 1,178 (554,246) (1,132) — — 6,053 11,283 226 — — $1 1,616 $161,650 890,297 $890,297 $4,281,623 $(7,514,796) $(30,142) $(2,211,367) (970) 9,195 (731) (970) 9,195 (731) 896 896 (132) (9,195) 731 5,406 10,456 18 (9,919) 99 9,919 (368,571) (22,492) (368,571) (22,492) (391,063) (1,102) — — 5,406 10,456 914 — $1 1,715 $171,569 898,687 $898,687 $4,278,988 $(7,883,367) $(52,634) $(2,586,756) (1,060) 5,450 (360) (1,060) 5,450 (360) 1,551 1,551 (348) (5,450) 360 6,126 11,588 95 (10,528) 106 10,528 118,105 (8,735) 118,105 (8,735) 109,370 (1,408) — — 6,126 11,588 1,646 — $1 1,821 $182,097 904,268 $904,268 $4,280,831 $(7,765,262) $(61,369) $(2,459,434) BALANCE FEBRUARY 27, 2010 . Net loss . . . . . Other comprehensive income: Changes in Defined Benefit Plans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 5 . . . . . . . . . . . Comprehensive loss . . Exchange of restricted shares for taxes . . . Issuance of restricted stock . . Cancellation of restricted stock . . . Amortization of restricted stock balance . . Stock-based compensation expense . . . Stock options exercised . . . . Dividends on preferred stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . BALANCE FEBRUARY 26, 2011 . . . Net loss . . . Other comprehensive income: Changes in Defined Benefit Plans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Comprehensive loss . . Exchange of restricted shares for taxes . . . Issuance of restricted stock . . Cancellation of restricted stock . . . Amortization of restricted stock balance . . Stock-based compensation expense . . . Stock options exercised . . . . Dividends on preferred stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . BALANCE MARCH 3, 2012 . . . Net income . . . Other comprehensive income: Changes in Defined Benefit Plans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Comprehensive income . . Exchange of restricted shares for taxes . . . Issuance of restricted stock . . Cancellation of restricted stock . . . Amortization of restricted stock balance . . Stock-based compensation expense . . . Stock options exercised . . . . Dividends on preferred stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . BALANCE MARCH 2, 2013 . . . . . . . The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. RITE AID CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (In thousands) OPERATING ACTIVITIES: Net income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Adjustments to reconcile to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lease termination and impairment charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . LIFO (credit) charge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gain on sale of assets, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stock-based compensation expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loss on debt retirements, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Changes in operating assets and liabilities: Accounts receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other assets and liabilities, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . March 2, 2013 (52 Weeks) Year Ended March 3, 2012 (53 Weeks) February 26, 2011 (52 Weeks) $ 118,105 $(368,571) $(555,424) 414,111 70,859 (147,882) (16,776) 17,717 140,502 440,582 100,053 188,722 (8,703) 15,861 33,576 82,721 130,100 (68) 10,199 (48,781) (169,935) 146,302 (62,569) 505,546 210,893 44,905 (22,224) 17,336 44,003 (10,955) 35,111 156,116 (29,458) Net cash provided by operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . 819,588 266,537 395,849 INVESTING ACTIVITIES: Payments for property, plant and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . Intangible assets acquired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Proceeds from sale-leaseback transactions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Proceeds from dispositions of assets and investments . . . . . . (315,846) (67,134) 6,355 30,320 (215,004) (35,133) 6,038 22,930 (162,287) (24,233) — 29,843 Net cash used in investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (346,305) (221,169) (156,677) FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net proceeds from (repayments to) revolver . . . . . . . . . . . . Principal payments on long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Change in zero balance cash accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net proceeds from the issuance of common stock . . . . . . . . Financing fees for early debt redemption . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Deferred financing costs paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,057,263 529,000 (2,920,209) (43,659) 1,646 (75,374) (54,783) Net cash(used in) provided by financing activities . . . . . (506,116) (Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (32,833) 162,285 822,285 108,000 (848,373) (32,838) 914 (11,778) (12,409) 25,801 71,169 91,116 650,000 (52,000) (779,706) (15,657) 226 (19,666) (34,847) (251,650) (12,478) 103,594 Cash and cash equivalents, end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 129,452 $ 162,285 $ 91,116 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 66 RITE AID CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS For the Years Ended March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012 and February 26, 2011 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Description of Business The Company is a Delaware corporation and through its 100 percent owned subsidiaries, operates retail drugstores in the United States of America. It is one of the largest retail drugstore chains in the United States, with 4,623 stores in operation as of March 2, 2013. The Company’s drugstores’ primary business is pharmacy services. The Company also sells a full selection of health and beauty aids and personal care products, seasonal merchandise and a large private brand product line. The Company’s operations consist solely of the retail drug segment. Revenues are as follows: March 2, 2013 (52 Weeks) Year Ended March 3, 2012 (53 Weeks) February 26, 2011 (52 Weeks) Pharmacy sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Front end sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $17,083,811 8,200,022 108,430 $17,725,645 8,293,643 101,934 $17,036,027 8,081,576 97,304 $25,392,263 $26,121,222 $25,214,907 Sales of prescription drugs represented approximately 67.6%, 68.1%, and 67.8% of the Company’s total sales in fiscal years 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The Company’s principal classes of products in fiscal 2013 were the following: Product Class Prescription drugs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Over-the-counter medications and personal care . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Health and beauty aids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . General merchandise and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Percentage of Sales 67.6% 9.9% 5.2% 17.3% Fiscal Year The Company’s fiscal year ends on the Saturday closest to February 29 or March 1. The fiscal year ended March 2, 2013 included 52 weeks. The fiscal year ended March 3, 2012 included 53 weeks and the fiscal year ended February 26, 2011 included 52 weeks. Principles of Consolidation The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and all of its 100 percent owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. 67 RITE AID CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) For the Years Ended March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012 and February 26, 2011 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on hand and highly liquid investments, which are readily convertible to known amounts of cash and which have original maturities of three months or less when purchased. Allowance for Uncollectible Receivables Approximately 96.6% of prescription sales are made to customers who are covered by third-party payors, such as insurance companies, government agencies and employers. The Company recognizes receivables that represent the amount owed to the Company for sales made to customers or employees of those payors that have not yet been paid. The Company maintains a reserve for the amount of these receivables deemed to be uncollectible. This reserve is calculated based upon historical collection activity adjusted for current conditions. Inventories Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Inventory balances include the capitalization of certain costs related to purchasing, freight and handling costs associated with placing inventory in its location and condition for sale. The Company uses the last-in, first-out (‘‘LIFO’’) cost flow assumption for substantially all of its inventories. The Company calculates its inflation index based on internal product mix and utilizes the link-chain LIFO method. Impairment of Long-Lived Assets Asset impairments are recorded when the carrying value of assets are not recoverable. For purposes of recognizing and measuring impairment of long-lived assets, the Company categorizes assets of operating stores as ‘‘Assets to Be Held and Used’’ and ‘‘Assets to Be Disposed Of.’’ The Company evaluates assets at the store level because this is the lowest level of identifiable cash flows ascertainable to evaluate impairment. Assets being tested for recoverability at the store level include tangible long-lived assets and identifiable, finite-lived intangibles that arose in purchase business combinations. Corporate assets to be held and used are evaluated for impairment based on excess cash flows from the stores that support those assets. The Company reviews long-lived assets to be held and used for impairment annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If the sum of the undiscounted expected future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset, the Company recognizes an impairment loss. Impairment losses are measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. When fair values are not available, the Company estimates fair value using the expected future cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with the risks associated with the recovery of the asset. 68 RITE AID CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) For the Years Ended March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012 and February 26, 2011 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) Property, Plant and Equipment Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization. The Company provides for depreciation using the straight-line method over the following useful lives: buildings—30 to 45 years; equipment—3 to 15 years. Leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the estimated useful life of the asset or the term of the lease. When determining the amortization period of a leasehold improvement, the Company considers whether discretionary exercise of a lease renewal option is reasonably assured. If it is determined that the exercise of such option is reasonably assured, the Company will amortize the leasehold improvement asset over the minimum lease term, plus the option period. This determination depends on the remaining life of the minimum lease term and any economic penalties that would be incurred if the lease option is not exercised. Capitalized lease assets are recorded at the lesser of the present value of minimum lease payments or fair market value and amortized over the estimated useful life of the related property or term of the lease. The Company capitalizes direct internal and external development costs associated with internal-use software. Neither preliminary evaluation costs nor costs associated with the software after implementation are capitalized. For fiscal years 2013, 2012 and 2011, the Company capitalized costs of approximately $5,844, $6,371 and $4,759, respectively. Intangible Assets The Company has certain finite-lived intangible assets that are amortized over their useful lives. The value of favorable and unfavorable leases on stores acquired in business combinations are amortized over the terms of the leases on a straight-line basis. Prescription files acquired in business combinations are amortized over an estimated useful life of ten years on an accelerated basis, which approximates the anticipated prescription file retention and related cash flows. Purchased prescription files acquired in other than business combinations are amortized over their estimated useful lives of five years on a straight-line basis. Deferred Financing Costs Costs incurred to issue debt are deferred and amortized as a component of interest expense over the terms of the related debt agreements. Amortization expense of deferred financing costs was $21,896, $22,049 and $23,797 for fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Revenue Recognition For front end sales, the Company recognizes revenue from the sale of merchandise at the time the merchandise is sold. The Company records revenue net of an allowance for estimated future returns. Return activity is immaterial to revenues and results of operations in all periods presented. For third party payor pharmacy sales, revenue is recognized at the time the prescription is filled, which is or approximates when the customer picks up the prescription and is recorded net of an allowance for 69 RITE AID CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) For the Years Ended March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012 and February 26, 2011 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) prescriptions that were filled but will not be picked up by the customer. For all periods presented, there is no material difference between the revenue recognized at the time the prescription is filled and that which would be recognized when the customer picks up the prescription. For cash prescriptions and patient third party payor co-payments, the Company recognizes revenue when the patient picks up the prescription and tenders the cash price or patient third party payor co-payment amount at the point of sale. Prescriptions are generally not returnable. The Company offers a chain wide loyalty card program titled wellness +. Members participating in the wellness + loyalty card program earn points on a calendar year basis for eligible front end merchandise purchases and qualifying prescriptions. One point is awarded for each dollar spent towards front end merchandise and 25 points are awarded for each qualifying prescription. Members reach specific wellness + tiers based on the points accumulated during the calendar year, which entitles such customers to certain future discounts and other benefits upon reaching that tier. For example, any customer that reaches 1,000 points in a calendar year achieves the ‘‘Gold’’ tier, enabling them to receive a 20% discount on qualifying purchases of front end merchandise for the remaining portion of the calendar year and also the next calendar year. There are also similar ‘‘Silver’’ and ‘‘Bronze’’ levels with lower thresholds and benefit levels. As wellness + customers accumulate points, the Company defers the retail value of the points earned as deferred revenue (included in other current and noncurrent liabilities, based on the expected usage). The amount deferred is based on historic and projected customer activity (e.g., tier level, spending level). As customers receive discounted front end merchandise, the Company recognizes an allocable portion of the deferred revenue. Cost of Goods Sold Cost of goods sold includes the following: the cost of inventory sold during the period, including related vendor rebates and allowances, LIFO credit or charges, costs incurred to return merchandise to vendors, inventory shrink, purchasing costs and warehousing costs, which include inbound freight costs from the vendor, distribution payroll and benefit costs, distribution center occupancy costs and depreciation expense and delivery expenses to the stores. Vendor Rebates and Allowances Rebates and allowances received from vendors relate to either buying and merchandising or promoting the product. Buying and merchandising related rebates and allowances are recorded as a reduction of cost of goods sold as product is sold. Buying and merchandising rebates and allowances include all types of vendor programs such as cash discounts from timely payment of invoices, purchase discounts or rebates, volume purchase allowances, price reduction allowances and slotting allowances. Certain product promotion related rebates and allowances, primarily related to advertising, are recorded as a reduction in selling, general and administrative expenses when the advertising commitment has been satisfied. 70 RITE AID CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) For the Years Ended March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012 and February 26, 2011 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) Rent The Company records rent expense on operating leases on a straight-line basis over the minimum lease term. The Company begins to record rent expense at the time that the Company has the right to use the property. From time to time, the Company receives incentive payments from landlords that subsidize lease improvement construction. These leasehold incentives are deferred and recognized on a straight-line basis over the minimum lease term. Selling, General and Administrative Expenses Selling, general and administrative expenses include store and corporate administrative payroll and benefit costs, occupancy costs which include retail store and corporate rent costs, facility and leasehold improvement depreciation and utility costs, advertising, repair and maintenance, insurance, equipment depreciation and professional fees. Repairs and Maintenance Routine repairs and maintenance are charged to operations as incurred. Improvements and major repairs, which extend the useful life of an asset, are capitalized and depreciated. Advertising Advertising costs, net of specific vendor advertising allowances, are expensed in the period the advertisement first takes place. Advertising expenses, net of vendor advertising allowances, for fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011 were $335,779, $369,405 and $367,412, respectively. Insurance The Company is self-insured for certain general liability and workers’ compensation claims. For claims that are self-insured, stop-loss insurance coverage is maintained for workers’ compensation occurrences exceeding $1,000 and general liability occurrences exceeding $2,000. The Company utilizes actuarial studies as the basis for developing reported claims and estimating claims incurred but not reported relating to the Company’s self-insurance. Workers’ compensation claims are discounted to present value using a risk-free interest rate. Benefit Plan Accruals The Company has several defined benefit plans, under which participants earn a retirement benefit based upon a formula set forth in the plan. The Company records expense related to these plans using actuarially determined amounts that are calculated under the provisions of ASC 715, ‘‘Compensation— Retirement Benefits.’’ Key assumptions used in the actuarial valuations include the discount rate, the expected rate of return on plan assets and the rate of increase in future compensation levels. 71 RITE AID CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) For the Years Ended March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012 and February 26, 2011 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) Stock-Based Compensation The Company has several stock option plans, which are described in detail in Note 15. The Company accounts for stock-based compensation under ASC 718, ‘‘Compensation—Stock Compensation.’’ The Company recognizes option expense over the requisite service period of the award, net of an estimate for the impact of award forfeitures. Store Pre-opening Expenses Costs incurred prior to the opening of a new or relocated store, associated with a remodeled store or related to the opening of a distribution facility are charged against earnings when incurred. Litigation Reserves The Company is involved in litigation on an ongoing basis. The Company accrues its best estimate of the probable loss related to legal claims. Such estimates are developed in consultation with in-house counsel, and are based upon a combination of litigation and settlement strategies. Facility Closing Costs and Lease Exit Charges When a store or distribution center is closed, the Company records an expense for unrecoverable costs and accrues a liability equal to the present value at current credit adjusted risk-free interest rates of the remaining lease obligations and anticipated ancillary occupancy costs, net of estimated sublease income. Other store or distribution center closing and liquidation costs are expensed when incurred. Income Taxes Deferred income taxes are determined based on the difference between the financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities. Deferred income tax expense (benefit) represents the change during the reporting period in the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities, net of the effect of acquisitions and dispositions. Deferred tax assets include tax loss and credit carryforwards and are reduced by a valuation allowance if, based on available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Changes in valuation allowances from period to period are included in the tax provision in the period of change. The Company has net operating loss (‘‘NOL’’) carryforwards that can be utilized to offset future income for federal and state tax purposes. These NOLs generate a significant deferred tax asset. The Company regularly reviews the deferred tax assets for recoverability considering historical profitability, projected taxable income, the expected timing of the reversals of existing temporary differences and tax planning strategies. The Company recognizes tax liabilities in accordance with ASC 740, ‘‘Income Taxes’’ and the Company adjusts these liabilities with changes in judgment as a result of the evaluation of new information not previously available. Due to the complexity of some of these uncertainties, the ultimate resolution may result in a payment that is materially different from the current estimate of the tax liabilities. 72 RITE AID CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) For the Years Ended March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012 and February 26, 2011 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) Sales Tax Collected Sales taxes collected from customers and remitted to various governmental agencies are presented on a net basis (excluded from revenues) in the Company’s statement of operations. Use of Estimates The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant Concentrations The Company’s pharmacy sales were primarily to customers covered by health plan contracts, which typically contract with a third party payor that agrees to pay for all or a portion of a customer’s eligible prescription purchases. During fiscal 2013, the top five third party payors accounted for approximately 71.7% of the Company’s pharmacy sales. The largest third party payor represented 35.3%, 22.9% and 23.8% of pharmacy sales during fiscal 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively. Third party payors are entities such as an insurance company, governmental agency, health maintenance organization or other managed care provider, and typically represent several health care contracts and customers. During fiscal 2013, state sponsored Medicaid agencies and related managed care Medicaid payors accounted for approximately 17.4% of the Company’s pharmacy sales, the largest of which was approximately 1.1% of the Company’s pharmacy sales. During fiscal 2013, approximately 30.0% of the Company’s pharmacy sales were to customers covered by Medicare Part D. Any significant loss of third- party payor business could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business and results of operations. During fiscal 2013, the Company purchased brand pharmaceuticals and some generic pharmaceuticals which amounted to approximately 88.7% of the dollar volume of its prescription drugs from a single wholesaler, McKesson Corp. (‘‘McKesson’’), under a supply contract expiring March 31, 2016. With limited exceptions, the Company is required to purchase all of its branded pharmaceutical products from McKesson. If the Company’s relationship with McKesson was disrupted, the Company could have temporary difficulty filling prescriptions for brand named drugs until a replacement wholesaler agreement was executed, which would negatively impact the business. The Company purchases almost all of its generic (non-brand name) pharmaceuticals directly from manufacturers which account for approximately 80% of its prescription volume. The loss of any one of the generic suppliers would not disrupt the Company’s ability to fill generic (non-brand name) prescriptions but could negatively impact the Company’s results. 73 RITE AID CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) For the Years Ended March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012 and February 26, 2011 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) Derivatives The Company may enter into interest rate swap agreements to hedge the exposure to increasing rates with respect to its variable rate debt, when the Company deems it prudent to do so. Upon inception of interest rate swap agreements, or modifications thereto, the Company performs a comprehensive review of the interest rate swap agreements based on the criteria as provided by ASC 815, ‘‘Derivatives and Hedging.’’ As of March 2, 2013 and March 3, 2012, the Company had no interest rate swap arrangements or other derivatives. Discontinued Operations For purposes of determining discontinued operations, the Company has determined that the store level is a component of the entity within the context of ASC 360, ‘‘Property, Plant and Equipment.’’ A component of an entity comprises operations and cash flows that can be clearly distinguished, operationally and for financial reporting purposes, from the rest of the Company. The Company routinely evaluates its store base and closes non-performing stores. The Company evaluates the results of operations of these closed stores both quantitatively and qualitatively to determine if it is appropriate for reporting as discontinued operations. Stores sold where the Company retains the prescription files are excluded from the analysis as the Company retains direct cash flows resulting from the migration of revenue to existing stores. Recent Accounting Pronouncements In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (‘‘FASB’’) issued an amendment related to statements of comprehensive income. This amendment requires an entity to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income in either a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The Company elected to report other comprehensive income and its components in a separate statement of comprehensive income beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2013. The adoption did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements. In February 2013, the FASB issued an amendment which adds new disclosure requirements for items classified out of accumulated other comprehensive income. These changes are effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The Company will adopt this guidance in the first quarter of fiscal 2014. In August 2010, the FASB issued an exposure draft regarding lease accounting that would require an entity to recognize assets and liabilities arising under lease contracts on the balance sheet. On the basis of feedback received from comment letters, roundtables, and outreach sessions, the FASB has made significant changes to the proposals in the original exposure draft and therefore has decided to re-expose the revised exposure draft in the second quarter of calendar 2013. The proposed standard, as currently drafted, will have a material impact on the Company’s reported results of operations and financial position. 74 RITE AID CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) For the Years Ended March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012 and February 26, 2011 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 2. Income (Loss) Per Share Basic income (loss) per share is computed by dividing income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. Diluted income (loss) per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the income of the Company subject to anti-dilution limitations. March 2, 2013 (52 Weeks) Year Ended March 3, 2012 (53 Weeks) February 26, 2011 (52 Weeks) Numerator for income (loss) per share: Net income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accretion of redeemable preferred stock . . . . . Cumulative preferred stock dividends . . . . . . . $118,105 (102) (10,528) $(368,571) $(555,424) (102) (9,346) (102) (9,919) Income (loss) attributable to common stockholders—basic and diluted . . . . . . . . . . . $107,475 $(378,592) $(564,872) Denominator: Basic weighted average shares . . . . . . . . . . . . Outstanding options and restricted shares, net . 889,562 17,697 Diluted weighted average shares . . . . . . . . . . . 907,259 885,819 — 885,819 882,947 — 882,947 Basic and diluted income (loss) per share . . . . $ 0.12 $ (0.43) $ (0.64) Due to their anti-dilutive effect, the following potential common shares have been excluded from the computation of diluted income (loss) per share as of March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012 and February 26, 2011: Stock options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Convertible preferred stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Convertible notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . March 2, 2013 (52 Weeks) 10,455 33,109 24,800 68,364 Year Ended March 3, 2012 (53 Weeks) 73,798 31,195 24,800 February 26, 2011 (52 Weeks) 74,298 29,391 24,800 129,793 128,489 Also excluded from the computation of diluted income (loss) per share as of March 3, 2012 and February 26, 2011 are restricted shares and restricted stock units of 11,506, and 7,078 which are included in shares outstanding. 75 RITE AID CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) For the Years Ended March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012 and February 26, 2011 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 3. Lease Termination and Impairment Charges Impairment Charges The Company evaluates long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that an asset group has a carrying value that may not be recoverable. The individual operating store is the lowest level for which cash flows are identifiable. As such, the Company evaluates individual stores for recoverability of assets. To determine if a store needs to be tested for recoverability, the Company considers items such as decreases in market prices, changes in the manner in which the store is being used or physical condition, changes in legal factors or business climate, an accumulation of losses significantly in excess of budget, a current period operating or cash flow loss combined with a history of operating or cash flow losses or a projection of continuing losses, or an expectation that the store will be closed or sold. The Company monitors new and recently relocated stores against operational projections and other strategic factors such as regional economics, new competitive entries and other local market considerations to determine if an impairment evaluation is required. For other stores, it performs a recoverability analysis if it has experienced current-period and historical cash flow losses. In performing the recoverability test, the Company compares the expected future cash flows of a store to the carrying amount of its assets. Significant judgment is used to estimate future cash flows. Major assumptions that contribute to its future cash flow projections include expected sales, gross profit, and distribution expenses; expected costs such as payroll, occupancy costs and advertising expenses; and estimates for other significant selling, and general and administrative expenses. Many long-term macro-economic and industry factors are considered, both quantitatively and qualitatively, in the future cash flow assumptions. In addition to current and expected economic conditions such as inflation, interest and unemployment rates that affect customer shopping patterns, the Company considers that it operates in a highly competitive industry which includes the actions of other national and regional drugstore chains, independently owned drugstores, supermarkets, mass merchandisers, dollar stores and internet pharmacies. Many of its competitors are spending significant capital and promotional dollars in certain geographies to gain market share. The Company has assumed certain sales growth from its loyalty program and other initiatives to grow sales. Recent and proposed Pharmacy Benefit Management consolidation and efforts of third party public and private payers have reduced pharmacy reimbursement rates in recent years. The Company expects this rate compression, which currently affects over 96% of its pharmacy business, to continue to affect it in the foreseeable future. The Company operates in a highly regulated industry and must make assumptions related to Federal and State efforts and proposals to affect the pricing and regulations related to prescription drugs, as well as, expected revenues and costs related to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (health care reform). Additionally, the Company takes into consideration that certain operating stores are executing specific improvement plans which are monitored quarterly to recoup recent capital investments, such as an acquisition of an independent pharmacy, which it has made to respond to specific competitive or local market conditions, or have specific programs tailored towards a specific geography or market. 76 RITE AID CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) For the Years Ended March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012 and February 26, 2011 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 3. Lease Termination and Impairment Charges (Continued) The Company recorded impairment charges of $24,892 in fiscal 2013, $51,998 in fiscal 2012 and $115,121 in fiscal 2011. The Company’s methodology for recording impairment charges has not changed materially, and has been consistently applied in the periods presented. At March 2, 2013, $1.922 billion of the Company’s long-lived assets, including intangible assets, were associated with 4,623 active operating stores. If an operating store’s estimated future undiscounted cash flows are not sufficient to cover its carrying value, its carrying value is reduced to fair value which is its estimated future discounted cash flows. The discount rate is commensurate with the risks associated with the recovery of a similar asset. An impairment charge is recorded in the period that the store does not meet its original return on investment and/or has an operating loss for the last 2 years and its projected cash flows do not exceed its current asset carrying value. The amount of the impairment charge is the entire difference between the current asset carrying value and the estimated fair value of the assets using discounted future cash flows. Most stores are fully impaired in the period that the impairment charge is originally recorded. The Company recorded impairment charges for active stores of $23,973 in fiscal 2013, $43,353 in fiscal 2012 and $108,999 in fiscal 2011. The Company reviews key performance results for active stores on a quarterly basis and approves certain stores for closure. Impairment for closed stores, if any (many stores are closed on lease expiration), are recorded in the quarter the closure decision is made and approved. Closure decisions are made on an individual store or regional basis considering all of the macro-economic, industry and other factors discussed above, in addition to, the active store’s individual operating results. The Company currently has no plans to close a significant number of operating stores in future periods. In the next fiscal year, the Company currently expects to close fewer than 50 stores, primarily as a result of lease expirations. The Company recorded impairment charges for closed facilities of $919 in fiscal 2013, $8,645 in fiscal 2012 and $6,122 in fiscal 2011. Included in the impairment charges noted above, the Company recorded charges of $594 in fiscal 2013, $5,863 in fiscal 2012 and $2,433 in fiscal 2011 for existing owned surplus property. Assets to be disposed of are evaluated quarterly to determine if an additional impairment charge is required. Fair value estimates are provided by independent brokers who operate in the local markets where the assets are located. 77 RITE AID CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) For the Years Ended March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012 and February 26, 2011 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 3. Lease Termination and Impairment Charges (Continued) The following table summarizes the impairment charges and number of locations, segregated by closed facilities and active stores that have been recorded in fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011: Closed facilities: Actual and approved store closings . . . . . Actual and approved relocations . . . . . . . Distribution center closings . . . . . . . . . . . Existing surplus properties . . . . . . . . . . . . Total impairment charges-closed facilities . . . Active stores: Additional current period charges for stores previously impaired in prior periods(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Charges for new and relocated stores that did not meet their asset recoverability test in the current period(2) . . . . . . . . . Charges for the remaining stores that did not meet their asset recoverability test in the current period(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . Total impairment charges-active stores . . . . . Total impairment charges-all locations . . . . . Total number of active stores . . . . . . . . . . . Stores impaired in prior periods with no current charge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stores with a current period charge . . . . . . . Total cumulative active stores with impairment charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,118 Year Ended March 2, 2013 March 3, 2012 February 26, 2011 Number Charge Number Charge Number Charge 29 — — 5 34 $ 325 — — 594 919 55 2 — 12 69 $ 2,283 499 — 5,863 8,645 51 1 1 17 70 $ 3,278 317 94 2,433 6,122 469 5,835 591 9,822 584 17,825 14 9,190 19 18,926 44 36,015 8,948 23,973 $24,892 47 530 564 4,623 588 530 55,159 108,999 $115,121 14,605 43,353 $51,998 53 663 732 4,667 428 663 1,091 167 795 865 4,714 263 795 1,058 (1) These charges are related to stores that were impaired for the first time in prior periods. Most active stores, requiring an impairment charge, are fully impaired in the first period that they do not meet their asset recoverability test. However, in each prior period presented, a minority of stores were partially impaired since their fair value supported a reduced net book value. Accordingly, these stores may be further impaired in the current and future periods as a result of changes in their actual or projected cash flows, or changes to their fair value estimates. Also, the Company makes ongoing capital additions to certain stores to improve their operating results or to meet geographical competition, which if later are deemed to be unrecoverable, will be impaired in future periods. Of this total, 464, 583 and 577 stores for fiscal years 2013, 2012 and 2011 respectively have been fully impaired. (2) These charges are related to new stores (open at least 3 years) and relocated stores (relocated in the last 2 years) that did not meet their recoverability test during the current period. These stores 78 RITE AID CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) For the Years Ended March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012 and February 26, 2011 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 3. Lease Termination and Impairment Charges (Continued) have not met their original return on investment projections and have a historical loss of at least 2 years. Their future cash flow projections do not recover their current carrying value. Of this total, 14, 19 and 43 stores for fiscal years 2013, 2012 and 2011 respectively have been fully impaired. (3) These charges are related to the remaining active stores that did not meet the recoverability test during the current period. These stores have a historical loss of at least 2 years. Their future cash flow projections do not recover their current carrying value. Of this total, 43, 43 and 141 stores for fiscal years 2013, 2012 and 2011 respectively have been fully impaired. The primary drivers of its impairment charges are each store’s current and historical operating performance and the assumptions that the Company makes about each store’s operating performance in future periods. Projected cash flows are updated based on the next year’s operating budget which includes the qualitative factors noted above. The Company is unable to predict with any degree of certainty which individual stores will fall short or exceed future operating plans. Accordingly, the Company is unable to describe future trends that would affect its impairment charges, including the likely stores and their related asset values that may fail their recoverability test in future periods. The Company utilizes the three-level valuation hierarchy for the recognition and disclosure of fair value measurements. The categorization of assets and liabilities within this hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the measurement of fair value. The three levels of the hierarchy consist of the following: (cid:127) Level 1—Inputs to the valuation methodology are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date. (cid:127) Level 2—Inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices in markets that are not active or inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the instrument. (cid:127) Level 3—Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable inputs based upon management’s best estimate of inputs market participants could use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date, including assumptions about risk. Long-lived non-financial assets are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis for purposes of calculating impairment using Level 2 and Level 3 inputs as defined in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value of long-lived assets using Level 2 inputs is determined by evaluating the current economic conditions in the geographic area for similar use assets. The fair value of long-lived assets using Level 3 inputs is determined by estimating the amount and timing of net future cash flows (which are unobservable inputs) and discounting them using a risk-adjusted rate of interest (which is Level 1). The Company estimates future cash flows based on its experience and knowledge of the market in which the store is located. Significant increases or decreases in actual cash flows may result in valuation changes. 79 RITE AID CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) For the Years Ended March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012 and February 26, 2011 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 3. Lease Termination and Impairment Charges (Continued) The table below sets forth by level within the fair value hierarchy the long-lived assets as of the impairment measurement date for which an impairment assessment was performed and total losses as of March 2, 2013 and March 3, 2012: Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) Fair Values as of Impairment Date Total Charges March 2, 2013 Long-lived assets held and used . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long-lived assets held for sale Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $— — $— $1,018 1,842 $2,860 $21,739 — $21,739 $22,757 1,842 $24,599 $(24,298) (594) $(24,892) Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) Fair Values as of Impairment Date Total Charges March 3, 2012 $— — $— $23,254 5,407 $28,661 $36,485 — $36,485 $59,739 5,407 $65,146 $(50,718) (1,280) $(51,998) Long-lived assets held and used . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long-lived assets held for sale Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lease Termination Charges Charges to close a store, which principally consist of continuing lease obligations, are recorded at the time the store is closed and all inventory is liquidated, pursuant to the guidance set forth in ASC 420, ‘‘Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations.’’ The Company calculates the liability for closed stores on a store-by-store basis. The calculation includes the discounted effect of future minimum lease payments and related ancillary costs, from the date of closure to the end of the remaining lease term, net of estimated cost recoveries that may be achieved through subletting or favorable lease terminations. The Company evaluates these assumptions each quarter and adjusts the liability accordingly. In fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011, the Company recorded lease termination charges of $45,967, $48,055 and $95,772. These charges related to changes in future assumptions, interest accretion and provisions for 14 stores in fiscal 2013, 23 stores in fiscal 2012, and 52 stores and one distribution center in fiscal 2011. As part of its ongoing business activities, the Company assesses stores and distribution centers for potential closure. Decisions to close or relocate stores or distribution centers in future periods would result in lease termination charges for lease exit costs and liquidation of inventory, as well as 80 RITE AID CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) For the Years Ended March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012 and February 26, 2011 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 3. Lease Termination and Impairment Charges (Continued) impairment of assets at these locations. The following table reflects the closed store and distribution center charges that relate to new closures, changes in assumptions and interest accretion: Balance—beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Provision for present value of noncancellable March 2, 2013 (52 Weeks) Year Ended March 3, 2012 (53 Weeks) February 26, 2011 (52 Weeks) $367,864 $405,350 $ 412,654 lease payments of closed stores . . . . . . . . . . 14,440 11,832 51,369 Changes in assumptions about future sublease income, terminations and change in interest rates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest accretion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cash payments, net of sublease income . . . . . . 9,023 23,246 (90,816) 11,305 26,084 (86,707) 19,585 26,234 (104,492) Balance—end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $323,757 $367,864 $ 405,350 The Company’s revenues and income (loss) before income taxes for fiscal 2013, 2012, and 2011 included results from stores that have been closed or are approved for closure as of March 2, 2013. The revenue, operating expenses, and income (loss) before income taxes of these stores for the periods are presented as follows: Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gain from sale of assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Income (loss) before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . Included in these stores’ income (loss) before income taxes are: Year Ended March 2, 2013 March 3, 2012 February 26, 2011 $ 99,034 112,300 (19,877) 812 5,799 $308,835 339,784 (15,212) (6,202) (9,535) $452,799 503,969 (19,369) 7,027 (38,828) Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inventory liquidation charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,103 1,039 4,189 873 7,219 4,897 The above results are not necessarily indicative of the impact that these closures will have on revenues and operating results of the Company in the future, as the Company often transfers the business of a closed store to another Company store, thereby retaining a portion of these revenues and operating expenses. 81 RITE AID CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) For the Years Ended March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012 and February 26, 2011 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 4. Fair Value Measurements The Company utilizes the three-level valuation hierarchy as described in Note 3, Lease Termination and Impairment Charges, for the recognition and disclosure of fair value measurements. As of March 2, 2013 and March 3, 2012, the Company did not have any financial assets measured on a recurring basis. Please see Note 3 for fair value measurements of non-financial assets measured on a non-recurring basis. Other Financial Instruments Financial instruments other than long-term indebtedness include cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable. These instruments are recorded at book value, which we believe approximate their fair values due to their short term nature. The fair value for LIBOR-based borrowings under the credit facility, term loans and term notes are estimated based on the quoted market price of the financial instrument which is considered Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. The fair values of substantially all of the Company’s other long-term indebtedness are estimated based on quoted market prices of the financial instruments which are considered Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. The carrying amount and estimated fair value of the Company’s total long-term indebtedness was $5,918,352 and $6,188,597, respectively, as of March 2, 2013. The carrying amount and estimated fair value of the Company’s total long-term indebtedness was $6,201,217 and $6,404,400, respectively, as of March 3, 2012. There were no outstanding derivative financial instruments as of March 2, 2013 and March 3, 2012. 5. Income Taxes The provision for income taxes was as follows: March 2, 2013 (52 Weeks) Year Ended March 3, 2012 (53 Weeks) February 26, 2011 (52 Weeks) Current tax expense (benefit): Federal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (6,305) $ 7,928 1,623 0 3,654 3,654 $ (36) 9,348 9,312 Deferred tax expense (benefit): Federal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (61,544) (50,679) 1,729 (29,069) 1,959 (1,429) Total income tax expense (benefit) . . . . . . . . . . . $(110,600) $(23,686) $ 9,842 (112,223) (27,340) 530 82 RITE AID CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) For the Years Ended March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012 and February 26, 2011 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 5. Income Taxes (Continued) A reconciliation of the expected statutory federal tax and the total income tax benefit was as follows: Expected federal statutory expense at 35% . . . . Nondeductible expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . State income taxes, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Increase (decrease) of previously recorded March 2, 2013 (52 Weeks) Year Ended March 3, 2012 (53 Weeks) February 26, 2011 (52 Weeks) $ 2,626 1,897 39,470 $(137,279) $(190,956) 1,354 (18,139) 2,408 11,492 liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (91,881) (17,771) 647 Recoverable Federal tax due to special 5-year NOL carryback . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Release of Indemnification Asset . . . . . . . . . . . Indemnification Receipt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Valuation allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (6,305) 37,324 587 (94,318) — — — 117,464 — — — 216,936 Total income tax expense (benefit) . . . . . . . . . . $(110,600) $ (23,686) $ 9,842 Net Income for fiscal 2013 included income tax benefit of $110,600 primarily comprised of adjustments to unrecognized tax benefits for the appellate settlements of the Brooks Eckerd IRS Audit for the fiscal years 2004 - 2007 and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Audit for fiscal years 2005 - 2007 as well as for the lapse of statute of limitations. The settlements resulted in the resolution of tax contingencies associated with these tax years which impacted the fiscal 2013 effective rate. Furthermore, the settlements with the IRS and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts do not impact the net financial position, results of operations or cash flows because this amount was offset by the reversal of the tax indemnification asset which was recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses. The income tax benefit was recorded net of adjustments to maintain a full valuation allowance against our net deferred tax assets. Additionally, the decrease to the valuation allowance recorded in fiscal 2013 included the impact of IRS adjustments made to tax attributes as well as reductions for the expiration of tax credits. ASC 740, ‘‘Income Taxes’’ requires a company to evaluate its deferred tax assets on a regular basis to determine if a valuation allowance against the net deferred tax assets is required. A cumulative loss in recent years is significant negative evidence in considering whether deferred tax assets are realizable. Based on the negative evidence, ASC 740 precludes relying on projections of future taxable income to support the recognition of deferred tax assets. Net loss for fiscal 2012 included income tax benefit of $23,686 and was primarily comprised of adjustments to unrecognized tax benefits due to the lapse of statute of limitations. The fiscal 2011 income tax expense was primarily comprised of an accrual for state and local taxes, adjustments to unrecognized tax benefits and the need for an accrual of additional state taxes resulting from the receipt of a final audit determination. 83 RITE AID CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) For the Years Ended March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012 and February 26, 2011 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 5. Income Taxes (Continued) The tax effect of temporary differences that gave rise to significant components of deferred tax assets and liabilities consisted of the following at March 2, 2013 and March 3, 2012: 2013 2012 Deferred tax assets: Accounts receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Liability for lease exit costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Pension, retirement and other benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . Long-lived assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Credits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net operating losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 62,745 214,110 142,456 219,515 374,101 2,079 62,121 1,558,694 $ 54,119 252,560 158,454 218,197 298,877 1,994 71,716 1,584,626 Total gross deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Valuation allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,635,821 (2,223,675) 2,640,543 (2,317,425) Total deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 412,146 323,118 Deferred tax liabilities: Inventory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total gross deferred tax liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 412,146 412,146 323,118 323,118 Net deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ — $ — A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits was as follows: 2013 2012 2011 Unrecognized tax benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Increases to prior year tax positions . . . . . . . . . Decreases to tax positions in prior periods . . . . Increases to current year tax positions . . . . . . . . Settlements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lapse of statute of limitations . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 247,722 6,305 (196,214) — (3,655) (24,138) $286,952 — (11,125) — — (28,105) $300,707 8,872 (16,940) 821 (2,498) (4,010) Unrecognized tax benefits balance . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 30,020 $247,722 $286,952 The amount of the above unrecognized tax benefits at March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012 and February 26, 2011 which would impact the Company’s effective tax rate, if recognized, was $14,651, $83,804 and $109,030, respectively. Additionally, any impact on the effective rate may be mitigated by the valuation allowance that is maintained against the Company’s net deferred tax assets. The Company is indemnified by Jean Coutu Group for certain tax liabilities incurred for all years ended up to and including the acquisition date of June 4, 2007, related to the Brooks Eckerd acquisition. Although the Company is indemnified by Jean Coutu Group, the Company remains the primary obligor to the tax authorities with respect to any tax liability arising for the years prior to the 84 RITE AID CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) For the Years Ended March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012 and February 26, 2011 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 5. Income Taxes (Continued) acquisition. Accordingly, as of March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012 and February 26, 2011, the Company had a corresponding recoverable indemnification asset of $30,710, $156,797 and $158,209 from Jean Coutu Group, included in the ‘‘Other Assets’’ line of the Consolidated Balance Sheets, to reflect the indemnification for such liabilities. Over the next 12 months, the Company believes that it is reasonably possible that the unrecognized tax positions reflected in the table above could decrease by $13,775, all of which would impact the effective tax rate if its tax positions are sustained upon audit, the controlling statute of limitations expires or the Company agrees to a disallowance. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to tax contingencies as income tax expense. Prior to the adoption of ASC 740, ‘‘Income Taxes,’’ the Company included interest as income tax expense and penalties as an operating expense. The Company recognized (benefit)/expense for interest and penalties in connection with tax matters of $(43,069), $(2,113) and $8,937 for fiscal years 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. As of March 2, 2013 and March 3, 2012 the total amount of accrued income tax-related interest and penalties was $22,197 and $65,266, respectively. The Company files U.S. federal income tax returns as well as income tax returns in those states where it does business. The consolidated federal income tax returns have been subject to examination by the IRS through fiscal 2008, including the Brooks Eckerd pre-acquisition periods. However, any net operating losses that were generated in these prior closed years may be subject to examination by the IRS upon utilization. Tax examinations by various state taxing authorities could generally be conducted for a period of three to five years after filing of the respective return. However, as a result of filing amended returns, the Company has statutes open in some states from fiscal year 2005. Net Operating Losses and Tax Credits At March 2, 2013, the Company had federal net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards of approximately $3,799,118, the majority of which will expire, if not utilized, between fiscal 2019 and 2022. At March 2, 2013, the Company had state NOL carryforwards of approximately $5,015,041, the majority of which will expire between fiscal 2018 and 2026. At March 2, 2013, the Company had federal business tax credit carryforwards of $50,080, the majority of which will expire between 2019 and 2021. In addition to these credits, the Company had alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards of $3,221. Valuation Allowances The valuation allowances as of March 2, 2013 and March 3, 2012 apply to the net deferred tax assets of the Company. The Company maintained a full valuation allowance of $2,223,675 and $2,317,425 against net deferred tax assets at March 2, 2013 and March 3, 2012, respectively. 85 RITE AID CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) For the Years Ended March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012 and February 26, 2011 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 6. Accounts Receivable The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts receivable based upon the expected collectability of accounts receivable. The allowance for uncollectible accounts at March 2, 2013 and March 3, 2012 was $28,271 and $28,832 respectively. The Company’s accounts receivable are due primarily from third-party payors (e.g., pharmacy benefit management companies, insurance companies or governmental agencies) and are recorded net of any allowances provided for under the respective plans. Since payments due from third-party payors are sensitive to payment criteria changes and legislative actions, the allowance is reviewed continually and adjusted for accounts deemed uncollectible by management. 7. Inventory At March 2, 2013 and March 3, 2012, inventories were $915,241 and $1,063,123, respectively, lower than the amounts that would have been reported using the first-in, first-out (‘‘FIFO’’) cost flow assumption. The Company calculates its FIFO inventory valuation using the retail method for store inventories and the cost method for distribution facility inventories. The Company recorded a LIFO credit for fiscal year 2013 of $147,882 compared to LIFO charges for fiscal years 2012 and 2011 of $188,722 and $44,905, respectively. During fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011, a reduction in inventories related to working capital initiatives resulted in the liquidation of applicable LIFO inventory quantities carried at lower costs in prior years. This LIFO liquidation resulted in a $4,316, $11,004 and $2,647 cost of sales decrease, with a corresponding reduction to the adjustment to LIFO for fiscal 2013, fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011, respectively. 8. Property, Plant and Equipment Following is a summary of property, plant and equipment, including capital lease assets, at March 2, 2013 and March 3, 2012: 2013 2012 Land . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Buildings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Leasehold improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Construction in progress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 243,413 753,952 1,733,607 2,079,372 55,013 $ 249,906 746,568 1,618,042 2,020,366 57,983 Accumulated depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,865,357 (2,969,707) 4,692,865 (2,790,844) Property, plant and equipment, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,895,650 $ 1,902,021 Depreciation expense, which included the depreciation of assets recorded under capital leases, was $286,374, $296,792 and $331,928 in fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Included in property, plant and equipment was the carrying amount of assets to be disposed of totaling $14,702 and $2,774 at March 2, 2013 and March 3, 2012, respectively. 86 RITE AID CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) For the Years Ended March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012 and February 26, 2011 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 9. Other Intangibles The Company’s intangible assets are finite-lived and amortized over their useful lives. Following is a summary of the Company’s intangible assets as of March 2, 2013 and March 3, 2012. 2013 2012 Gross Carrying Amount Accumulated Amortization Remaining Weighted Average Amortization Period Gross Carrying Amount Accumulated Amortization Remaining Weighted Average Amortization Period Favorable leases and other . $ 623,541 $ (413,556) (1,031,668) Prescription files . . . . . . . . 1,286,087 10 years $ 614,862 $ (374,685) (950,846) 4 years 1,239,444 10 years 5 years Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,909,628 $(1,445,224) $1,854,306 $(1,325,531) Also included in other non-current liabilities as of March 2, 2013 and March 3, 2012 are unfavorable lease intangibles with a net carrying amount of $70,195 and $82,030, respectively. Amortization expense for these intangible assets and liabilities was $127,737, $143,790 and $173,618 for fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The anticipated annual amortization expense for these intangible assets and liabilities is 2014—$104,289; 2015—$87,308; 2016—$76,037; 2017—$63,004 and 2018—$25,170. 10. Accrued Salaries, Wages and Other Current Liabilities Accrued salaries, wages and other current liabilities consisted of the following at March 2, 2013 and March 3, 2012: Accrued wages, benefits and other personnel costs . . . . . . . Accrued sales and other taxes payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued store expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 437,222 132,767 228,276 358,050 $ 415,539 103,596 200,222 345,150 2013 2012 $1,156,315 $1,064,507 87 RITE AID CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) For the Years Ended March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012 and February 26, 2011 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 11. Indebtedness and Credit Agreement Following is a summary of indebtedness and lease financing obligations at March 2, 2013 and March 3, 2012: Secured Debt: Senior secured revolving credit facility due August 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Senior secured revolving credit facility due February 2018 (or December 2016 or March 2017, see Credit Facility below) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tranche 2 Term Loan due June 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tranche 5 Term Loan due March 2018 ($333,367 face value less unamortized discount of $1,488) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tranche 6 Term Loan due February 2020 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9.75% senior secured notes (senior lien) due June 2016 ($410,000 face value less unamortized discount of $4,579) (satisfied and discharged on February 21, 2013) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.00% senior secured notes (senior lien) due August 2020 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10.375% senior secured notes (second lien) due July 2016 ($470,000 face value less unamortized discount of $24,422) (satisfied and discharged on February 21, 2013) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.5% senior secured notes (second lien) due March 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tranche 1 Term Loan (second lien) due August 2020 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10.25% senior secured notes (second lien) due October 2019 ($270,000 face value less unamortized discount of $1,364 and $1,569) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other secured . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Guaranteed Unsecured Debt: 8.625% senior notes due March 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9.375% senior notes due December 2015 ($405,000 face value less unamortized discount of $2,673) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9.5% senior notes due June 2017 ($810,000 face value less unamortized discount 2013 2012 — $ 136,000 665,000 — — 1,044,433 — 1,161,000 331,879 — — 650,000 405,421 650,000 — 500,000 470,000 268,636 5,298 445,578 500,000 — 268,431 5,342 3,719,934 3,787,084 — — 54,156 402,327 of $5,529 and $6,830) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 804,471 803,170 9.25% senior notes due March 2020 ($902,000 face value plus unamortized premium of $4,759) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 906,759 481,000 Unguaranteed Unsecured Debt: 9.25% senior notes due June 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.875% senior debentures due August 2013 (satisfied and discharged on February 21, 2013) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.5% convertible notes due May 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.7% notes due February 2027 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.875% fixed-rate senior notes due December 2028 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lease financing obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,711,230 1,740,653 — 6,015 — 64,188 295,000 128,000 487,188 115,179 180,277 64,188 295,000 128,000 673,480 126,984 Total debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Current maturities of long-term debt and lease financing obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,033,531 (37,311) 6,328,201 (79,421) Long-term debt and lease financing obligations, less current maturities . . . . . . . . . . $5,996,220 $6,248,780 88 RITE AID CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) For the Years Ended March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012 and February 26, 2011 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 11. Indebtedness and Credit Agreement (Continued) Credit Facility The Company has a senior secured credit facility that consists of a $1,795,000 revolving credit facility and a $1,161,000 senior secured term loan (the ‘‘Tranche 6 Term Loan’’). Borrowings under the revolving credit facility bear interest from February 21, 2013 through May 31, 2013 at a rate per annum of LIBOR plus 2.50%, if we choose to make LIBOR borrowings, or Citibank’s base rate plus 1.50%, and thereafter at a rate per annum between LIBOR plus 2.25% and LIBOR plus 2.75%, if the Company chooses to make LIBOR borrowings, or between Citibank’s base rate plus 1.25% and Citibank’s base rate plus 1.75% in each case based upon the amount of revolver availability as defined in the senior secured credit facility. The Company is required to pay fees between 0.375% and 0.50% per annum on the daily unused amount of the revolver, depending on the amount of revolver availability. Amounts drawn under the revolver become due and payable on February 21, 2018, provided that such maturity date shall be accelerated to ninety-one days prior to the maturity of the 7.5% senior secured notes due 2017, in the event that the Company does not repay or refinance such notes on or prior to such date, or ninety-one days prior to the maturity of the 9.5% senior notes due 2017, in the event that the Company does not repay or refinance such notes on or prior to such date. The Tranche 6 Term Loan matures on February 21, 2020 and currently bears interest at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus 3.00%, if the Company chooses to make LIBOR borrowings, or at Citibank’s base rate plus 2.00%. The Tranche 6 Term Loan is subject to a 1.00% LIBOR floor per annum. The Company’s ability to borrow under the revolver is based upon a specified borrowing base consisting of accounts receivable, inventory and prescription files. At March 2, 2013, the Company had $665,000 of borrowings outstanding under the revolver and had letters of credit outstanding against the revolver of $114,970, which resulted in additional borrowing capacity of $1,015,030. The senior secured credit facility contains certain restrictions on the ability of the Company and the subsidiary guarantors to accumulate cash on hand, and under certain circumstances, requires the funds in the Company’s deposit accounts to be applied first to the repayment of outstanding revolving loans under the senior secured credit facility and then to be held as Collateral for the senior obligations. The senior credit facility restricts the amount of secured and unsecured debt the Company may have outstanding in addition to borrowings under the senior secured credit facility and existing indebtedness, subject to limitations on the amount of such debt that shall mature or require scheduled payments of principal prior to May 21, 2020. The senior secured credit facility allows the Company to incur an unlimited amount of unsecured debt with a maturity beyond May 21, 2020. However, the Company’s second priority secured term loan facility and the indentures that govern the Company’s secured and guaranteed unsecured notes contain restrictions on the amount of additional secured and unsecured debt that can be incurred by the Company. The Company could not incur any additional secured debt assuming a fully drawn revolver and the outstanding letters of credit. The ability to issue additional unsecured debt under the second priority secured term loan facility and the indentures is generally governed by an interest coverage ratio test. 89 RITE AID CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) For the Years Ended March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012 and February 26, 2011 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 11. Indebtedness and Credit Agreement (Continued) The senior secured credit facility contains additional covenants which place restrictions on the incurrence of debt, the payments of dividends, sale of assets, mergers and acquisitions and the granting of liens. The credit facility has a financial covenant, which is the maintenance of a fixed charge coverage ratio. The covenant requires that, if availability on the revolving credit facility is less than $150,000, the Company must maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.00 to 1.00. As of March 2, 2013, the Company was in compliance with this financial covenant. The senior secured credit facility also provides for customary events of default. The Company also has a second priority secured term loan facility, which includes a second priority secured term loan (the ‘‘Tranche 1 Term Loan’’). The Tranche 1 Term Loan matures on August 21, 2020 and currently bears interest at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus 4.75%, if the Company chooses to make LIBOR borrowings, or at Citibank’s base rate plus 3.75%. The Tranche 6 Term Loan is subject to a 1.00% LIBOR floor per annum. Substantially all of Rite Aid Corporation’s 100 percent owned subsidiaries guarantee the obligations under the senior secured credit facility, second priority secured term loan facility, secured guaranteed notes and unsecured guaranteed notes. The senior secured credit facility, second priority secured term loan facility and secured guaranteed notes are secured, on a senior or second priority basis, as applicable, by a lien on, among other things, accounts receivable, inventory and prescription files of the subsidiary guarantors. The subsidiary guarantees related to the Company’s senior secured credit facility, second priority secured term loan facility and secured guaranteed notes and, on an unsecured basis, the unsecured guaranteed notes are full and unconditional and joint and several, and there are no restrictions on the ability of the Company to obtain funds from its subsidiaries. Also, the Company has no independent assets or operations, and subsidiaries not guaranteeing the credit facility, second priority secured term loan facility and applicable notes are minor. Accordingly, condensed consolidating financial information for the Company and subsidiaries is not presented. Other 2013 Transactions In February 2013, the Company used the proceeds from the Tranche 6 Term Loan, the proceeds from its Tranche 1 Term Loan, borrowings under our revolving credit facility and available cash to repurchase and repay all of its outstanding $410,000 aggregate principal of 9.750% senior secured notes due 2016, $470,000 aggregate principal of 10.375% senior secured notes due 2016 and $180,277 aggregate principal amount of 6.875% senior debentures due 2013. In February 2013, $257,261 aggregate principal amount of the 9.750% notes, $401,999 aggregate principal amount of the 10.375% notes and $119,119 aggregate principal amount of the 6.875% debentures, respectively, were tendered and repurchased by the Company. The Company redeemed the remaining 9.750% notes and 10.375% notes for $171,432 and $72,901, respectively, which included the call premium and interest through the redemption date. Additionally, the Company discharged the remaining 6.875% debentures for $63,416, which included interest through maturity. These 9.750% notes, 10.375% notes and 6.875% debentures were satisfied and discharged as of February 21, 2013. 90 RITE AID CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) For the Years Ended March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012 and February 26, 2011 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 11. Indebtedness and Credit Agreement (Continued) In February 2013, the Company also used available cash to redeem $6,015 aggregate principal amount of 9.25% senior notes due 2013 at par for $6,147, which included interest through the redemption date. In connection with the above transactions, the Company recorded a loss on debt retirement, including tender and call premium and interest, unamortized debt issue costs and unamortized discount of $122,660. In February 2012, the Company issued $481,000 of its 9.25% senior notes due 2020 and in May 2012, the Company issued an additional $421,000 of its 9.25% senior notes due 2020. The proceeds of the notes, together with available cash, were used to repurchase the 8.625% senior notes due 2015 and the 9.375% senior notes due 2015, respectively. These notes are unsecured, unsubordinated obligations of Rite Aid Corporation and rank equally in right of payment with all other unsubordinated indebtedness. The Company’s obligations under the notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally, on an unsubordinated basis, by all of its subsidiaries that guarantee the Company’s obligations under the senior secured credit facility, the second priority secured term loan facility and the outstanding 8.00% senior secured notes due 2020, 7.5% senior secured notes due 2017, 10.25% senior secured notes due 2019 and 9.5% senior notes due 2017. In May 2012, the Company completed a tender offer for the 9.375% notes in which $296,269 aggregate principal amount of the outstanding 9.375% notes were tendered and repurchased. In June 2012, the Company redeemed the remaining 9.375% notes for $108,731, which included the call premium and interest through the redemption date. The May 2012 refinancing resulted in an aggregate loss on debt retirement of $17,842. 2012 Transactions In February 2012, the Company completed a tender offer for the 8.625% notes in which $404,844 aggregate principal amount of the outstanding 8.625% notes were tendered and repurchased, resulting in an aggregate loss on debt retirement of $16,066, recorded in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012. In March 2012, the Company redeemed the remaining 8.625% notes for $55,644, which included the call premium and interest through the redemption date. During August 2011, the Company repurchased $41,000 of its 8.625% notes, $5,000 of its 9.375% notes and $4,496 of its 6.875% debentures. These repurchases resulted in a gain for the period of $4,924. 2011 Transactions In August 2010, the Company issued $650,000 of 8.00% senior secured notes due August 2020. These notes are unsecured, unsubordinated obligations of Rite Aid Corporation and rank equally in right of payment with all other unsubordinated indebtedness. The Company’s obligations under these notes are guaranteed, subject to certain limitations, by the same subsidiaries that guarantee the obligations under the senior secured credit facility. These guarantees are shared, on a senior basis, with debt outstanding under the senior secured credit facility. The indenture that governs the 8.00% notes 91 RITE AID CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) For the Years Ended March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012 and February 26, 2011 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 11. Indebtedness and Credit Agreement (Continued) contains covenant provisions that, among other things, allow the holders of the notes to participate along with the term loan holders in the mandatory prepayments resulting from the proceeds of certain asset dispositions (at the option of the noteholder) and include limitations on the Company’s ability to pay dividends, make investments or other restricted payments, incur debt, grant liens, sell assets and enter into sale-leaseback transactions. In July 2010, the Company repurchased $93,812 of its $158,000 outstanding 8.5% convertible notes. The remaining 8.5% convertible notes require that the Company maintain a listing on the New York Stock Exchange. In the event of a delisting, holders of these notes could require the Company to repurchase them. The Company has the ability to repurchase these notes under its credit agreement. Interest Rates and Maturities The annual weighted average interest rate on the Company’s indebtedness was 7.1%, 7.4%, and 7.5% for fiscal 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively. The aggregate annual principal payments of long-term debt for the five succeeding fiscal years are as follows: 2014—$14,006; 2015—$11,610; 2016—$740,798; 2017—$511,610 and $4,642,462 in 2018 and thereafter. 12. Leases The Company leases most of its retail stores and certain distribution facilities under noncancellable operating and capital leases, most of which have initial lease terms ranging from 5 to 22 years. The Company also leases certain of its equipment and other assets under noncancellable operating leases with initial terms ranging from 3 to 10 years. In addition to minimum rental payments, certain store leases require additional payments based on sales volume, as well as reimbursements for taxes, maintenance and insurance. Most leases contain renewal options, certain of which involve rent increases. Total rental expense, net of sublease income of $8,536, $8,866, and $9,662, was $951,239, $976,892, and $965,665 in fiscal 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively. These amounts include contingent rentals of $21,026, $22,659 and $23,336 in fiscal 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively. During fiscal 2013, the Company sold two owned operating stores to independent third parties. Net proceeds from the sale were $6,355. Concurrent with these sales, the Company entered into agreements to lease the stores back from the purchasers over a minimum lease term of 12 to 20 years. The Company accounted for these leases as operating leases. The transactions resulted in a gain of $1,818 which is included in the gain on sale of assets, net for the fifty-two weeks ended March 2, 2013. During fiscal 2012, the Company sold two owned operating stores to independent third parties. Net proceeds from the sale were $6,038. Concurrent with these sales, the Company entered into agreements to lease the stores back from the purchasers over a minimum lease term of 7 to 10 years. The Company accounted for these leases as operating leases. The transactions resulted in a loss of $3,896 which is included in the gain on sale of assets, net for the fifty-three weeks ended March 3, 2012. During fiscal 2011, the Company had no sale-leaseback transactions. 92 RITE AID CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) For the Years Ended March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012 and February 26, 2011 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 12. Leases (Continued) The net book values of assets under capital leases and sale-leasebacks accounted for under the financing method at March 2, 2013 and March 3, 2012 are summarized as follows: Land . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Buildings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Leasehold improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accumulated depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2013 2012 $ 6,692 137,206 1,691 21,316 (103,381) $ 6,695 142,483 1,236 19,261 (100,300) $ 63,524 $ 69,375 Following is a summary of lease finance obligations at March 2, 2013 and March 3, 2012: Obligations under financing leases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sale-leaseback obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Less current obligation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $107,308 7,876 (23,334) $119,108 7,876 (19,977) Long-term lease finance obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 91,850 $107,007 2013 2012 Following are the minimum lease payments for all properties under a lease agreement that will have to be made in each of the years indicated based on non-cancelable leases in effect as of March 2, 2013: Fiscal year Lease Financing Obligations Operating Leases 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Later years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 32,992 21,543 21,459 19,575 13,674 45,949 $ 997,548 959,376 905,031 838,639 751,161 3,820,698 Total minimum lease payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155,192 $8,272,453 Amount representing interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (40,008) Present value of minimum lease payments . . . . . . . . . . . $115,184 93 RITE AID CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) For the Years Ended March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012 and February 26, 2011 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 13. Redeemable Preferred Stock In March 1999 and February 1999, Rite Aid Lease Management Company, a 100 percent owned subsidiary of the Company, issued 63,000 and 150,000 shares of Cumulative Preferred Stock, Class A, par value $100 per share, respectively. The Class A Cumulative Preferred Stock is mandatorily redeemable on April 1, 2019 at a redemption price of $100 per share plus accumulated and unpaid dividends. The Class A Cumulative Preferred Stock pays dividends quarterly at a rate of 7.0% per annum of the par value of $100 per share when, as and if declared by the Board of Directors of Rite Aid Lease Management Company in its sole discretion. The amount of dividends payable in respect of the Class A Cumulative Preferred Stock may be adjusted under certain events. The outstanding shares of the Class A Preferred Stock were recorded at their estimated fair value of $19,253 for the fiscal 2000 issuances, which equaled the sale price on the date of issuance. Because the fair value of the Class A Preferred Stock was less than the mandatory redemption amount at issuance, periodic accretions to expense using the interest method are made so that the carrying amount equals the redemption amount on the mandatory redemption date. Accretion was $102 in fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011. The amount of this instrument is $20,686 and $20,583 and is recorded in Other Non-Current Liabilities as of March 2, 2013 and March 3, 2012, respectively. 14. Capital Stock As of March 2, 2013, the authorized capital stock of the Company consists of 1,500,000 shares of common stock and 20,000 shares of preferred stock, each having a par value of $1.00 per share. Preferred stock is issued in series, subject to terms established by the Board of Directors. The Company has outstanding Series G and Series H preferred stock. The Series G preferred stock has a liquidation preference of $100 per share and pays quarterly dividends at 7% of liquidation preference. The Series G preferred stock can be redeemed at the Company’s election after January 2009. The Company has not elected to redeem the remaining Series G preferred stock as of March 2, 2013. The Series H preferred stock pays dividends of 6% of liquidation preference and can be redeemed at the Company’s election after January 2010. All dividends can be paid in either cash or in additional shares of preferred stock, at the election of the Company. Any redemptions are at 105% of the liquidation preference of $100 per share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends. The Series H shares are convertible into common stock of the Company, at the holder’s option, at a conversion rate of $5.50 per share. The Company has not elected to redeem the Series H preferred stock as of March 2, 2013. 15. Stock Option and Stock Award Plans The Company recognizes share-based compensation expense in accordance with ASC 718, ‘‘Compensation—Stock Compensation.’’ Expense is recognized over the requisite service period of the award, net of an estimate for the impact of forfeitures. Operating results for fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011 include $17,717, $15,861 and $17,336 of compensation costs related to the Company’s stock-based compensation arrangements. 94 RITE AID CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) For the Years Ended March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012 and February 26, 2011 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 15. Stock Option and Stock Award Plans (Continued) In November 1999, the Company adopted the 1999 Stock Option Plan (the 1999 Plan), under which 10,000 shares of common stock are authorized for the granting of stock options at the discretion of the Board of Directors. In December 2000, the Company adopted the 2000 Omnibus Equity Plan (the 2000 Plan) under which 22,000 shares of common stock are reserved for granting of restricted stock, stock options, phantom stock, stock bonus awards and other stock awards at the discretion of the Board of Directors. In February 2001, the Company adopted the 2001 Stock Option Plan (the 2001 Plan) which was approved by the shareholders under which 20,000 shares of common stock are authorized for granting of stock options at the discretion of the Board of Directors. In April 2004, the Board of Directors adopted the 2004 Omnibus Equity Plan, which was approved by the shareholders. Under the plan, 20,000 shares of common stock are authorized for granting of restricted stock, stock options, phantom stock, stock bonus awards and other equity based awards at the discretion of the Board of Directors. In January 2007, the stockholders of Rite Aid Corporation approved the adoption of the Rite Aid Corporation 2006 Omnibus Equity Plan. Under the plan, 50,000 shares of Rite Aid common stock are available for granting of restricted stock, stock options, phantom stock, stock bonus awards and other equity based awards at the discretion of the Board of Directors. In June 2010, the stockholders of Rite Aid Corporation approved the adoption of the Rite Aid Corporation 2010 Omnibus Equity Plan. Under the plan, 35,000 shares of Rite Aid common stock are available for granting of restricted stock, stock options, phantom stock, stock bonus awards and other equity based awards at the discretion of the Board of Directors. The adoption of the 2010 Omnibus Equity Plan became effective on June 23, 2010. In June 2012, the stockholders of Rite Aid Corporation approved the adoption of the Rite Aid Corporation 2012 Omnibus Equity Plan. Under the plan, 28,500 shares of Rite Aid common stock are available for granting of restricted stock, stock options, phantom stock, stock bonus awards and other equity based awards at the discretion of the Board of Directors. The adoption of the 2012 Omnibus Equity Plan became effective on June 21, 2012. All of the plans provide for the Board of Directors (or at its election, the Compensation Committee) to determine both when and in what manner options may be exercised; however, it may not be more than 10 years from the date of grant. All of the plans provide that stock options may be granted at prices that are not less than the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date of grant. The aggregate number of shares authorized for issuance for all plans is 109,764 as of March 2, 2013. 95 RITE AID CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) For the Years Ended March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012 and February 26, 2011 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 15. Stock Option and Stock Award Plans (Continued) Stock Options The Company determines the fair value of stock options issued on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model. The following weighted average assumptions were used for options granted in fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011: Expected stock price volatility(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . Expected dividend yield(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Risk-free interest rate(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Expected option life(4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85% 0.00% 0.71% 79% 0.00% 1.45% 79% 0.00% 1.92% 5.5 years 5.5 years 5.5 years 2013 2012 2011 (1) The expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the stock price over the most recent period equal to expected life of the option. (2) The dividend rate that will be paid out on the underlying shares during the expected term of the options. The Company does not currently pay dividends on its common stock, as such, the dividend rate is assumed to be zero percent. (3) The risk free interest rate is equal to the rate available on United States Treasury zero-coupon issues as of the grant date of the option with a remaining term equal to the expected term. (4) The period of time for which the option is expected to be outstanding. The Company analyzed historical exercise behavior. 96 RITE AID CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) For the Years Ended March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012 and February 26, 2011 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 15. Stock Option and Stock Award Plans (Continued) The weighted average fair value of options granted during fiscal 2013, 2012, and 2011 was $0.91, $0.82, and $0.71, respectively. Following is a summary of stock option transactions for the fiscal years ended March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012, and February 26, 2011: Outstanding at February 27, 2010 . . . . . . Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cancelled . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Shares 76,114 17,443 (244) (19,015) Outstanding at February 26, 2011 . . . . . . 74,298 Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cancelled . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23,200 (896) (22,804) Weighted Average Exercise Price Per Share Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term Aggregate Intrinsic Value 3.08 1.07 0.92 3.66 2.47 1.19 1.02 4.31 Outstanding at March 3, 2012 . . . . . . . . . 73,798 $1.52 Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cancelled . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,020 (1,535) (3,283) 1.32 1.06 2.08 Outstanding at March 2, 2013 . . . . . . . . . 81,000 $1.48 6.79 $38,963 Vested or expected to vest at March 2, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72,742 Exercisable at March 2, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . 42,893 $1.51 $1.71 6.66 5.75 $35,262 $21,534 As of March 2, 2013, there was $18,202 of total unrecognized pre-tax compensation costs related to unvested stock options, net of forfeitures. These costs are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.35 years. Cash received from stock option exercises for fiscal 2013, 2012, and 2011 was $1,646, $914, and $226 respectively. There was no income tax benefit from stock options for fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011. The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised for fiscal 2013, 2012, and 2011 was $714, $255, and $81, respectively. Typically, stock options granted vest, and are subsequently exercisable in equal annual installments over a four-year period for employees. During fiscal 2012, certain employee stock options and awards were issued that vest 50% in year 3 and 50% in year four. Non-employee director options granted vest, and are subsequently exercisable in equal annual installments over a three-year period. 97 RITE AID CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) For the Years Ended March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012 and February 26, 2011 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 15. Stock Option and Stock Award Plans (Continued) Restricted Stock The Company provides restricted stock grants to associates under plans approved by the stockholders. Shares awarded under the plans vest in installments up to three years. Beginning in fiscal 2011, stock awards granted to non-employee directors vest 80% in year one, 10% in year two and 10% in year three. Unvested shares are forfeited upon termination of employment. Following is a summary of restricted stock transactions for the fiscal years ended March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012, and February 26, 2011: Balance at February 27, 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Vested . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cancelled . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Balance at February 26, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Vested . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cancelled . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value 2.26 1.07 3.21 1.65 1.12 1.23 1.11 1.16 Shares 5,944 4,574 (3,055) (385) 7,078 8,525 (3,366) (731) Balance at March 3, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,506 $1.20 Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Vested . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cancelled . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,450 (3,917) (362) 1.31 1.18 1.26 Balance at March 2, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,677 $1.25 At March 2, 2013, there was $9,465 of total unrecognized pre-tax compensation costs related to unvested restricted stock grants, net of forfeitures. These costs are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.06 years. The total fair value of restricted stock vested during fiscal years 2013, 2012, and 2011 was $4,623, $3,724, and $9,819, respectively. 16. Retirement Plans Defined Contribution Plans The Company and its subsidiaries sponsor several retirement plans that are primarily 401(k) defined contribution plans covering nonunion associates and certain union associates. The Company does not contribute to all of the plans. In accordance with those plan provisions, the Company matches 100% of a participant’s pretax payroll contributions, up to a maximum of 3% of such participant’s pretax annual compensation. Thereafter, the Company will match 50% of the participant’s additional pretax payroll contributions, up to a maximum of 2% of such participant’s additional pretax annual 98 RITE AID CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) For the Years Ended March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012 and February 26, 2011 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 16. Retirement Plans (Continued) compensation. Total expense recognized for the above plans was $56,480 in fiscal 2013, $57,036 in fiscal 2012 and $58,035 in fiscal 2011. The Company sponsors a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (‘‘SERP’’) for its officers, which is a defined contribution plan that is subject to a five year graduated vesting schedule. The expense recognized for the SERP was $7,469 in fiscal 2013, $4,582 in fiscal 2012, and $9,433 in fiscal 2011. Defined Benefit Plans The Company and its subsidiaries also sponsor a qualified defined benefit pension plan that requires benefits to be paid to eligible associates based upon years of service and, in some cases, eligible compensation. The Company’s funding policy for The Rite Aid Pension Plan (The ‘‘Defined Benefit Pension Plan’’) is to contribute the minimum amount required by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. However, the Company may, at its sole discretion, contribute additional funds to the plan. The Company made contributions of $5,583 in fiscal 2013, $14,878 in fiscal 2012, and $13,451 in fiscal 2011. The Company also maintains a nonqualified executive retirement plan for certain former employees who, pursuant to their employment agreements, did not participate in the SERP. The Company no longer enrolls new participants into this plan. These participants generally receive an annual benefit payable monthly over fifteen years. This nonqualified defined benefit plan is unfunded. 99 RITE AID CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) For the Years Ended March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012 and February 26, 2011 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 16. Retirement Plans (Continued) Net periodic pension expense and other changes recognized in other comprehensive income for the defined benefit pension plans and the nonqualified executive retirement plan included the following components: Service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Expected return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of unrecognized prior service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amortization of unrecognized net loss (gain) . Defined Benefit Pension Plan Nonqualified Executive Retirement Plan 2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011 $ 2,908 6,128 (6,719) $ 2,988 6,501 (6,192) $ 2,972 6,124 (4,819) $ — $ 616 — 21 771 — $ 72 847 — 240 3,926 639 2,435 861 2,114 — 866 — (582) — (926) Net pension expense(income) . . . . . . . . . . . $ 6,483 $ 6,371 $ 7,252 $1,482 $ 210 $ (7) Other changes recognized in other comprehensive loss: Unrecognized net (gain) loss arising during period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Prior service cost arising during period . . . . Amortization of unrecognized prior service $12,901 — $24,664 (275) $ 279 — $ 866 — $ 595 — $ 593 — costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (240) (639) (861) — — — Amortization of unrecognized net (loss) gain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (3,926) (2,435) (2,114) (866) 582 925 Net amount recognized in other comprehensive loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,735 21,315 (2,696) — 1,177 1,518 Net amount recognized in pension expense and other comprehensive loss . . . . . . . . . . . $15,218 $27,686 $ 4,556 $1,482 $1,387 $1,511 100 RITE AID CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) For the Years Ended March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012 and February 26, 2011 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 16. Retirement Plans (Continued) The table below sets forth reconciliation from the beginning of the year for both the benefit obligation and plan assets of the Company’s defined benefit plans, as well as the funded status and amounts recognized in the Company’s balance sheet as of March 2, 2013 and March 3, 2012: Defined Benefit Pension Plan Nonqualified Executive Retirement Plan 2013 2012 2013 2012 Change in benefit obligations: Benefit obligation at end of prior year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Distributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Change due to change in assumptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Change due to Plan amendments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Actuarial (gain) loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $142,310 2,908 6,128 (6,644) 13,979 — (159) $115,499 2,988 6,501 (6,957) 23,574 (275) 980 $ 14,509 — 616 (1,659) 756 — 110 $ 14,822 21 771 (1,700) 823 — (228) Benefit obligation at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $158,522 $142,310 $ 14,332 $ 14,509 Change in plan assets: Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . Employer contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Actual return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Distributions (including expenses paid by the plan) . . . . $108,196 5,583 9,067 (8,073) $ 94,195 14,878 7,507 (8,384) $ — $ 1,659 — (1,659) — 1,700 — (1,700) Fair value of plan assets at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $114,773 $108,196 $ — $ — Funded status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (43,749) $ (34,114) $(14,331) $(14,509) Net amount recognized . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (43,749) $ (34,114) $(14,331) $(14,509) Amounts recognized in consolidated balance sheets consisted of: Prepaid pension cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued pension liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Net amount recognized . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss consist of: Net actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Prior service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ — $ — $ — $ (43,749) (34,114) (14,331) — (14,509) $ (43,749) $ (34,114) $(14,331) $(14,509) $ (59,143) $ (50,168) $ (547) (787) — $ — — $ — — — Amount recognized . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (59,690) $ (50,955) $ The estimated net actuarial loss and prior service cost amounts that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive loss into net periodic pension expense in fiscal 2014 are $4,810 and $240, respectively. 101 RITE AID CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) For the Years Ended March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012 and February 26, 2011 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 16. Retirement Plans (Continued) The accumulated benefit obligation for the defined benefit pension plan was $158,368 and $142,117 as of March 2, 2013 and March 3, 2012, respectively. The accumulated benefit obligation for the nonqualified executive retirement plan was $14,331 and $14,509 as of March 2, 2013 and March 3, 2012, respectively. The significant actuarial assumptions used for all defined benefit plans to determine the benefit obligation as of March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012, and February 26, 2011 were as follows: Defined Benefit Pension Plan Nonqualified Executive Retirement Plan 2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011 Discount rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rate of increase in future compensation levels . . . . . . . . 4.00% 4.50% 5.50% 4.00% 4.50% 5.50% 4.50% 5.00% 5.00% N/A% 3.00% 3.00% Weighted average assumptions used to determine net cost for the fiscal years ended March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012 and February 26, 2011 were: Defined Benefit Pension Plan Nonqualified Executive Retirement Plan 2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011 Discount rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rate of increase in future compensation levels . . . . . . . Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets . . . . . 4.50% 5.50% 6.00% 4.50% 5.50% 6.00% 3.00% 3.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% N/A N/A 7.75% 7.75% 7.75% N/A N/A To develop the expected long-term rate of return on assets assumption, the Company considered the historical returns and the future expectations for returns for each asset class, as well as the target asset allocation of the pension portfolio. This resulted in the selection of the 7.75% long-term rate of return on plan assets assumption for fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011. The Company’s pension plan asset allocations at March 2, 2013 and March 3, 2012 by asset category were as follows: Equity securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fixed income securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60% 40% 60% 40% Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100% 100% March 2, March 3, 2013 2012 102 RITE AID CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) For the Years Ended March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012 and February 26, 2011 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 16. Retirement Plans (Continued) The investment objectives of the Defined Benefit Pension Plan, the only defined benefit plan with assets, are to: (cid:127) Achieve a rate of return on investments that exceeds inflation over a full market cycle and is consistent with actuarial assumptions; (cid:127) Balance the correlation between assets and liabilities by diversifying the portfolio among various asset classes to address return risk and interest rate risk; (cid:127) Balance the allocation of assets between the investment managers to minimize concentration risk; (cid:127) Maintain liquidity in the portfolio sufficient to meet plan obligations as they come due; and (cid:127) Control administrative and management costs. The asset allocation established for the pension investment program reflects the risk tolerance of the Company, as determined by: (cid:127) the current and anticipated financial strength of the Company; (cid:127) the funded status of the plan; and (cid:127) plan liabilities. Investments in both the equity and fixed income markets will be maintained, recognizing that historical results indicate that equities (primarily common stocks) have higher expected returns than fixed income investments. It is also recognized that the correlation between assets and liabilities must be balanced to address higher volatility of equity investments (return risk) and interest rate risk. The following targets are to be applied to the allocation of plan assets. Category U.S. equities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . International equities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . U.S. fixed income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Target Allocation 45% 15% 40% Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100% The Company expects to contribute $833 to the Defined Benefit Pension Plan and make payments of $1,654 to participants of the Nonqualified Executive Retirement Plan during fiscal 2014. 103 RITE AID CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) For the Years Ended March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012 and February 26, 2011 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 16. Retirement Plans (Continued) The following table sets forth by level within the fair value hierarchy a summary of the plan’s investments measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 2, 2013 and March 3, 2012: Fair Value Measurements at March 2, 2013 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) Significant Observable Inputs (Level 2) Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) Total Equity Securities International equity . . . . . . Large Cap . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mid Cap . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Small Cap . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fixed Income Long Term Credit Bond Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other types of investments Short Term Investments . . . Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $— — — — — — $— $ 17,199 35,098 12,562 4,236 45,664 14 $114,773 $— — — — — — $— $ 17,199 35,098 12,562 4,236 45,664 14 $114,773 Fair Value Measurements at March 3, 2012 Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) Significant Observable Inputs (Level 2) Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) Total Equity Securities International equity . . . . . . Large Cap . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mid Cap . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Small Cap . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fixed Income Long Term Credit Bond Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Other types of investments Short Term Investments . . . Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $— — — — — — $— $ 16,265 33,350 11,765 3,733 42,924 159 $108,196 $— — — — — — $— $ 16,265 33,350 11,765 3,733 42,924 159 $108,196 The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy. Common and Collective Trusts Common collective trust funds are stated at fair value as determined by the issuer of the common collective trust funds based on the fair market value of the underlying investments. 104 RITE AID CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) For the Years Ended March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012 and February 26, 2011 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 16. Retirement Plans (Continued) Following are the future benefit payments expected to be paid for the Defined Benefit Pension Plan and the nonqualified executive retirement plan during the years indicated: Fiscal Year Defined Benefit Pension Plan Nonqualified Executive Retirement Plan 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2019 - 2023 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 6,764 6,943 7,128 7,351 7,565 41,146 $76,897 $ 1,654 1,597 1,539 1,344 1,150 4,377 $11,661 Other Plans The Company participates in various multi-employer union pension plans that are not sponsored by the Company. Total expenses recognized for the multi-employer plans were $19,787 in fiscal 2013, $14,594 in fiscal 2012 and $19,053 in fiscal 2011. 17. Multiemployer Plans that Provide Pension Benefits The Company contributes to a number of multiemployer defined benefit pension plans under the terms of collective-bargaining agreements that cover certain of its union-represented employees. The risks of participating in these multiemployer plans are different from single-employer plans. Assets contributed to the multiemployer plan by one employer may be used to provide benefits to employees of other participating employers. If a participating employer stops contributing to the plan, the unfunded obligations of the plan may be borne by the remaining participating employers. Additionally, if the Company chooses to stop participating in some of its multiemployer plans, the Company may be required to pay those plans an amount based on the underfunded status of the plan, referred to as a withdrawal liability. The Company’s participation in these plans for the annual period ended March 2, 2013 is outlined in the table below. The ‘‘EIN/Pension Plan Number’’ column provides the Employer Identification Number (EIN) and the three-digit plan number, if applicable. The most recent Pension Protection Act (PPA) zone status available for fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2012 is for the plan year-ends as indicated below. The zone status is based on information that the Company received from the plan and is certified by the plan’s actuary. Among other factors, plans in the red zone are generally less than 65 percent funded, plans in the yellow zone are less than 80 percent funded, and plans in the green zone are at least 80 percent funded. The ‘‘FIP/RP Status Pending/Implemented’’ column indicates plans for which a financial improvement plan (FIP) or a rehabilitation plan (RP) is either pending or has been implemented. In addition to regular plan contributions, the Company may be subject to a surcharge if the plan is in the red zone. The ‘‘Surcharge Imposed’’ column indicates whether a surcharge has been imposed on contributions to the plan. The last two columns list the expiration date(s) of the collective-bargaining agreement(s) to which the plans are 105 RITE AID CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) For the Years Ended March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012 and February 26, 2011 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 17. Multiemployer Plans that Provide Pension Benefits (Continued) subject and any minimum funding requirements. There have been no significant changes that affect the comparability of total employer contributions of fiscal years 2011, 2012, and 2013. EIN/Pension Plan Number Pension Protection Act Zone Status 2013 2012 FIP/ RP Status Pending/ Implemented Contributions of the Company 2013 2012 2011 Expiration Date of Collective- Surcharge Bargaining Agreement Imposed Minimum Funding Requirements . . . 13-3604862-001 Green— 12/31/2011 Green— 12/31/2011 No $ 9,830 $ 9,156 $ 7,315 No 4/18/2015 Contribution rate Pension 1199 SEIU Health Care Employees Pension Fund . of 11.5% of gross wages earned per associate. 7/12/2015 Contributions of $1.156 per hour worked for pharmacists and $0.524 per hour worked for non pharmacists. 7/13/2013 Contributions of $0.57 per hour worked for associates. Southern California United Food and Commercial Workers Union and Drug Employers Pension . . fund . . . . . . . Northern California Pharmacists, Clerks and Drug Employers . Pension Plan . . . United Food and 51-6029925-001 Red— 12/31/2012 Green— Implemented 12/31/2011 3,416 459 6,585 No 94-2518312-001 Green— 12/31/2011 Green— 12/31/2011 No 2,858 2,937 2,951 No Commercial Workers Union-Employer Pension Fund . . . . 34-6665155-001 Yellow— 9/30/2011 Yellow— Implemented 9/30/2011 559 529 517 No 12/31/2014 Contribution rate of $1.38 per hour worked. Other Funds . . . . . . 3,124 1,513 1,685 $19,787 $14,594 $19,053 The Company was listed in these plans Forms 5500 as providing more than 5 percent of the total contributions for the following plans and plan years: Pension Fund Northern California Pharmacists, Clerks and Drug Employers Pension Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . United Food and Commercial Workers Union- Year Contributions to Plan Exceeded More Than 5 Percent of Total Contributions (as of the Plan’s Year-End) 12/31/2011 and 12/31/2010 Employer Pension Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9/30/2011 and 9/30/2010 At the date the Company’s financial statements were issued, certain Forms 5500 were not available. 106 RITE AID CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) For the Years Ended March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012 and February 26, 2011 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 17. Multiemployer Plans that Provide Pension Benefits (Continued) During fiscal 2013, the Company withdrew from the 1360 New Jersey Pension effective August 2011 and incurred a $2,032 withdrawal liability and Central Ohio Locals 1059 and 75 effective March 31, 2013 and incurred a liability of $3,000. During fiscal 2012, the Company withdrew from the NW OH Pension Fund effective December 2011 and incurred a $1,300 withdrawal liability. 18. Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees Legal Matters The Company is a party to legal proceedings, investigations and claims in the ordinary course of its business, including the matters described below. The Company records accruals for outstanding legal matters when it believes it is probable that a loss will be incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. The Company evaluates, on a quarterly basis, developments in legal matters that could affect the amount of any accrual and developments that would make a loss contingency both probable and reasonably estimable. If a loss contingency is not both probable and estimable, the Company does not establish an accrued liability. The Company’s contingencies are subject to significant uncertainties, including, among other factors: (i) proceedings are in early stages; (ii) whether class or collective action status is sought and the likelihood of a class being certified; (iii) the outcome of pending appeals or motions; (iv) the extent of potential damages, fines or penalties, which are often unspecified or indeterminate; (v) the impact of discovery on the matter; (vi) whether novel or unsettled legal theories are at issue; (vii) there are significant factual issues to be resolved; and/or (viii) in the case of certain government agency investigations, whether a sealed qui tam lawsuit (‘‘whistleblower’’ action) has been filed and whether the government agency makes a decision to intervene in the lawsuit following investigation. Since December 2008, the Company has been named in a series of fifteen (15) currently pending putative collective and class action lawsuits filed in federal and state courts around the country, purportedly on behalf of current and former assistant store managers and co-managers working in the Company’s stores at various locations outside California, including Craig et al v. Rite Aid Corporation et al pending in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania (the ‘‘Court’’) and Ibea et al v. Rite Aid Corporation pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The lawsuits allege that the Company failed to pay overtime to salaried assistant store managers and co- managers as purportedly required under the Fair Labor Standards Act (‘‘FLSA’’) and certain state statutes. The lawsuits also seek other relief, including liquidated damages, punitive damages, attorneys’ fees, costs and injunctive relief arising out of the state and federal claims for overtime pay. The Company aggressively challenged both the merits of the lawsuits and the allegation that the cases should be certified as class or collective actions. However, in light of the cost and uncertainty involved in these lawsuits, in May 2012, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with Plaintiffs’ counsel to resolve the series of lawsuits. The parties filed a joint motion for preliminary approval of the settlement with the Court which was granted on June 18, 2012. A final resolution of these matters was subject to final Court approval. The Court held a final approval hearing on December 4, 2012 and issued an Order approving the settlement on 107 RITE AID CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) For the Years Ended March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012 and February 26, 2011 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 18. Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees (Continued) January 7, 2013. The Order was not appealed and is final. Settlement funds to those who chose to participate in the settlement were disbursed on March 13, 2013 concluding the matter. The Company has been named in a collective and class action lawsuit, Indergit v. Rite Aid Corporation et al pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed purportedly on behalf of current and former store managers working in the Company’s stores at various locations around the country. The lawsuit alleges that the Company failed to pay overtime to store managers as required under the FLSA and under certain New York state statutes. The lawsuit also seeks other relief, including liquidated damages, punitive damages, attorneys’ fees, costs and injunctive relief arising out of state and federal claims for overtime pay. On April 2, 2010, the Court conditionally certified a nationwide collective group of individuals who worked for the Company as store managers since March 31, 2007. The Court ordered that Notice of the Indergit action be sent to the purported members of the collective group (approximately 7,000 current and former store managers) and approximately 1,550 joined the Indergit action. Discovery as to certification issues has been completed. The parties have fully briefed the issues of Rule 23 class certification of the New York store manager claims and decertification of the nationwide collective action claims and are awaiting a ruling from the Court. At this time, the Company is not able to either predict the outcome of this lawsuit or estimate a potential range of loss with respect to the lawsuit. The Company’s management believes, however, that this lawsuit is without merit and not appropriate for collective or class action treatment and is vigorously defending this lawsuit. The Company is currently a defendant in several putative class action lawsuits filed in state courts in California alleging violations of California wage and hour laws, rules and regulations pertaining primarily to failure to pay overtime, pay for missed meals and rest periods and failure to provide employee seating. These suits purport to be class actions and seek substantial damages. At this time, the Company is not able to either predict the outcome of these lawsuits or estimate a potential range of loss with respect to the lawsuits. The Company’s management believes, however, that the plaintiffs’ allegations are without merit and that their claims are not appropriate for class action treatment. The Company is vigorously defending all of these claims. The Company was served with a United States Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General (‘‘OIG’’) subpoena dated March 5, 2010 in connection with an investigation being conducted by the OIG and the United States Attorney’s Office for the Central District of California. The subpoena requests records related to any gift card inducement programs for customers who transferred prescriptions for drugs or medicines to the Company’s pharmacies, and whether any customers who receive federally funded prescription benefits (e.g. Medicare and Medicaid) may have benefited from those programs. The Company has substantially completed its production of records in response to the subpoena and is unable to predict the timing or outcome of any review by the government of such information. The Company received a subpoena dated May 9, 2011 from certain California counties seeking information regarding compliance with environmental regulations governing the management of hazardous waste. The Company has responded to the subpoena, is cooperating with California regulators, and continues to review its operations pertaining to the management of hazardous materials. 108 RITE AID CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) For the Years Ended March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012 and February 26, 2011 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 18. Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees (Continued) The Company is in discussions with the California regulators and has recorded an estimated amount to settle these matters. The Company was served with a Civil Investigative Demand Subpoena Duces Tecum dated August 26, 2011 by the United States Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Michigan. The subpoena requests records regarding Rite Aid’s Rx Savings Program and the reporting of usual and customary charges to publicly funded health programs. In connection with the same investigation, the Company was served with a Civil Subpoena Duces Tecum dated February 22, 2013 by the State of Indiana Office of the Attorney General. The Company is completing its response to both of the subpoenas and is unable to predict the timing or outcome of any review by the government of such information. In addition to the above described matters, the Company is subject from time to time to various claims and lawsuits and governmental investigations arising in the ordinary course of our business. While the Company’s management cannot predict the outcome of any of the claims, the Company’s management does not believe that the outcome of any of these legal matters will be material to the Company’s consolidated financial position. It is possible, however, that the Company’s results of operations or cash flows in a particular fiscal period could be materially affected by an unfavorable resolution of pending litigation or contingencies. Contingencies The California Department of Health Care Services (‘‘DHCS’’), the agency responsible for administering the State of California Medicaid program, implemented retroactive reimbursement rate reductions effective June 1, 2011, impacting the medical provider community in California, including pharmacies. Numerous medical providers, including representatives of both chain and independent pharmacies, filed suits against DHCS in federal district court in California and obtained preliminary injunctions against the rate cuts, subject to a trial on the merits. DHCS has appealed the preliminary injunctions to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which Court vacated the injunctions. The numerous medical providers are considering their options. Based upon the actions of DHCS, the Company has recorded an appropriate accrual. As pertinent facts and circumstances develop, this accrual may be adjusted. 109 RITE AID CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) For the Years Ended March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012 and February 26, 2011 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 19. Supplementary Cash Flow Data March 2, 2013 Year Ended March 3, 2012 February 26, 2011 Cash paid for interest (net of capitalized amounts of $399, $315 and $509) . . . . . . . . $ 482,145 $ 528,894 $ 464,456 Cash (refund) payments for income taxes, net . Equipment financed under capital leases . . . . Equipment received for noncash consideration Preferred stock dividends paid in additional shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Non-cash reduction in lease financing obligation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Accrued capital expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $ $ $ $ $ (776) $ 7,906 3,285 10,528 $ $ $ 4,913 7,052 3,616 9,919 $ $ $ $ 4,907 4,622 3,476 9,346 — $ — $ — 45,456 $ 45,454 $ 37,557 Gross borrowings from revolver . . . . . . . . . . . $1,117,000 $2,654,000 $1,511,000 Gross repayments to revolver . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 588,000 $2,546,000 $1,563,000 20. Related Party Transactions There were receivables from related parties of $23 and $77 at March 2, 2013 and March 3, 2012, respectively. As of March 2, 2013, the Jean Coutu Group owned 178,401,162 shares (19.0% of the voting power of the Company) of common stock. On April 17, 2013, the Jean Coutu Group announced that it had sold 72,500,000 of its 178,401,162 shares of Rite Aid’s common stock. As a result of such sale, the Jean Coutu Group was required to cause one of its designees to immediately resign from Rite Aid’s board of directors and accordingly, Michel Coutu resigned from Rite Aid’s board of directors effective April 17, 2013. At this level of ownership, the Jean Coutu Group (and, subject to certain conditions, certain members of the Coutu family) have the right to designate one of the nine members of the Company’s board of directors, subject to adjustment for future reductions in its ownership position in the Company. The Company had a financial advisory services agreement with Leonard Green & Partners, L.P. to pay a monthly fee of $12.5 plus out-of-pocket expenses which was terminated in fiscal 2012. The Company paid fees of $38 and $163 for financial advisory services and expense reimbursements of $67 and $151, in fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011, respectively. 110 RITE AID CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) For the Years Ended March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012 and February 26, 2011 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 21. Interim Financial Results (Unaudited) Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cost of goods sold . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Selling, general and administrative Fiscal Year 2013 First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter Year $6,468,287 4,719,516 $6,230,884 4,520,463 $6,237,847 4,426,526 $6,455,245 4,407,482 $25,392,263 18,073,987 expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,688,066 1,618,169 1,612,198 1,682,332 6,600,765 Lease termination and impairment charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loss on debt retirements, net . . . . . . (Gain) loss on sale of assets and 12,143 130,588 17,842 7,783 129,054 — 14,366 128,371 — 36,567 127,408 122,660 70,859 515,421 140,502 investments, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (10,051) (2,954) (6,262) 2,491 (16,776) 6,558,104 6,272,515 6,175,199 6,378,940 25,384,758 (Loss) income before income taxes . . Income tax (benefit) expense . . . . . . (89,817) (61,729) (41,631) (2,866) 62,648 777 76,305 (46,782) Net (loss) income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (28,088) $ (38,765) $ 61,871 $ 123,087 Basic (loss) income per share(1) . . . . Diluted (loss) income per share(1) . . $ $ (0.03) $ (0.05) $ (0.03) $ (0.05) $ 0.07 0.07 $ $ 0.14 0.13 7,505 (110,600) 118,105 0.12 0.12 $ $ $ 111 RITE AID CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) For the Years Ended March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012 and February 26, 2011 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 21. Interim Financial Results (Unaudited) (Continued) Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Cost of goods sold . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Selling, general and administrative Fiscal Year 2012 First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter Year $6,390,793 4,699,874 $6,271,091 4,622,130 $6,312,584 4,641,204 $7,146,754 5,364,679 $26,121,222 19,327,887 expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,586,236 1,603,752 1,583,098 1,758,325 6,531,411 Lease termination and impairment charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Loss (gain) on debt retirements, net . Gain on sale of assets and 17,090 130,760 22,434 15,118 130,829 (4,924) 11,540 129,927 — 56,305 137,739 16,066 100,053 529,255 33,576 investments, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (4,792) (848) (2,172) (891) (8,703) 6,451,602 6,366,057 6,363,597 7,332,223 26,513,479 Loss before income taxes . . . . . . . . . Income tax expense (benefit) . . . . . . (60,809) 2,273 (94,966) (2,712) (51,013) 972 (185,469) (24,219) (392,257) (23,686) Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (63,082) $ (92,254) $ (51,985) $ (161,250) $ (368,571) Basic loss per share(1) . . . . . . . . . . . Diluted loss per share(1) . . . . . . . . . $ $ (0.07) $ (0.11) $ (0.06) $ (0.18) $ (0.07) $ (0.11) $ (0.06) $ (0.18) $ (0.43) (0.43) (1) Income (loss) per share amounts for each quarter may not necessarily total to the yearly income (loss) per share due to the weighting of shares outstanding on a quarterly and year-to-date basis. During the fourth quarter of 2013, the Company recorded a loss on debt retirement related to the February 2013 refinancing as discussed in Note 11. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, the Company recorded facilities impairment charges of $24,012 and a LIFO credit of $175,384 due to significant deflation associated with generic products, partially offset by normal brand inflation. During the first quarter of 2012, the Company recorded a loss on debt retirement related to the repayment of its Tranche 3 Term Loan as discussed in Note 11. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company recorded facilities impairment charges of $49,170 and LIFO expense of $121,219 as inflation was higher than at prior year end. 112 RITE AID CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) For the Years Ended March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012 and February 26, 2011 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 22. Financial Instruments The carrying amounts and fair values of financial instruments at March 2, 2013 and March 3, 2012 are listed as follows: 2013 2012 Carrying Amount Fair Value Carrying Amount Fair Value Variable rate indebtedness . . . . . Fixed rate indebtedness . . . . . . . $2,296,001 $3,622,351 $2,275,694 $3,912,903 $1,512,313 $4,688,904 $1,469,813 $4,934,587 Cash, trade receivables and trade payables are carried at market value, which approximates their fair values due to the short-term maturity of these instruments. The following methods and assumptions were used in estimating fair value disclosures for financial instruments: LIBOR-based borrowings under credit facilities: The carrying amounts for LIBOR-based borrowings under the credit facilities, term loans and term notes are estimated based on the quoted market price of the financial instruments. Long-term indebtedness: The fair values of long-term indebtedness are estimated based on the quoted market prices of the financial instruments. If quoted market prices were not available, the Company estimated the fair value based on the quoted market price of a financial instrument with similar characteristics. 113 RITE AID CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES SCHEDULE II—VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS For the Years Ended March 2, 2013, March 3, 2012 and February 26, 2011 (dollars in thousands) Allowances deducted from accounts receivable for estimated uncollectible amounts: Year ended March 2, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . Year ended March 3, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . Year ended February 26, 2011 . . . . . . . Balance at Beginning of Period $28,832 $25,116 $31,549 Additions Charged to Costs and Expenses $36,397 $18,274 $14,359 Deductions $36,958 $14,558 $20,792 Balance at End of Period $28,271 $28,832 $25,116 114 Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. SIGNATURES RITE AID CORPORATION By: /s/ JOHN T. STANDLEY John T. Standley Chairman/President and Chief Executive Officer Dated: April 23, 2013 Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in their respective capacities on April 23, 2013. Signature Title /s/ JOHN T. STANDLEY John T. Standley /s/ FRANK G. VITRANO Frank G. Vitrano Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (principal executive officer) Chief Financial Officer, Chief Administrative Officer and Senior Executive Vice President (principal financial officer) /s/ DOUGLAS E. DONLEY Douglas E. Donley Chief Accounting Officer and Senior Vice President (principal accounting officer) /s/ JOSEPH B. ANDERSON, JR Director Joseph B. Anderson, Jr /s/ JOHN BAUMER John Baumer Director /s/ FRANCOIS J. COUTU Director Francois J. Coutu /s/ JAMES L. DONALD James L. Donald Director 115 Signature Title /s/ DAVID R. JESSICK David R. Jessick Director /s/ MICHAEL N. REGAN Director Michael N. Regan /s/ MARY F. SAMMONS Director Mary F. Sammons /s/ MARCY SYMS Marcy Syms Director 116 RITE AID CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES We have calculated the ratio of earnings to fixed charges in the following table by dividing earnings by fixed charges. For this purpose, earnings include pre-tax income from continuing operations plus fixed charges, before capitalized interest. Fixed charges include interest, whether expensed or capitalized, amortization of debt expense, preferred stock dividend requirement and that portion of rental expense which is representative of the interest factor in those rentals. Exhibit 12 Year Ended March 2, 2013 March 3, 2012 February 26, 2011 February 27, 2010 February 28, 2009 (52 Weeks) (53 Weeks) (52 Weeks) (52 Weeks) (52 Weeks) (dollars in thousands) Fixed charges: Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Interest portion of net rental expense(1) . 515,421 317,080 529,255 325,631 547,581 321,888 515,763 320,506 477,627 320,947 Fixed charges before capitalized interest and preferred stock dividend requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Preferred stock dividend requirements(2) . Capitalized interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 832,501 21,056 399 854,886 19,838 315 869,469 18,692 509 Total fixed charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 853,956 875,039 888,670 Earnings: 836,269 17,614 859 854,742 798,574 43,536 1,434 843,544 Income (loss) before income taxes . . . . . . Preferred stock dividend requirements(2) . . Fixed charges before capitalized interest 7,505 (21,056) 853,557 (392,257) (19,838) 874,724 (545,582) (18,692) 888,161 (479,918) (17,614) 853,883 (2,582,794) (43,536) 842,110 Total adjusted earnings (loss) . . . . . . . . . . 840,006 462,629 323,887 356,351 (1,784,220) Earnings to fixed charges deficiency . . . . . . (13,950) (412,410) (564,783) (498,391) (2,627,764) Ratio of earnings to fixed charges(3) . . . . — — — — — (1) The interest portion of net rental expense is estimated to be equal to one-third of the minimum rental expense for the period. (2) The preferred stock dividend requirement is computed as the pre-tax earnings that would be required to cover preferred stock dividends. (3) For the years ended, February 28, 2009, February 27, 2010, February 26, 2011, March 3, 2012, and March 2, 2013 earnings were insufficient to cover fixed charges by approximately $2.6 billion, $498.4 million, $564.8 million, $412.4 million, and $14.0 million respectively. Company (Name in which such subsidiary conducts business if other than corporate name): State of Incorporation or Organization Exhibit 21 112 Burleigh Avenue Norfolk, LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1515 West State Street Boise, Idaho, LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1740 Associates, LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3581 Carter Hill Road—Montgomery Corp. . . . . . . 4042 Warrensville Center Road—Warrensville Ohio, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5277 Associates, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5600 Superior Properties, Inc. 657-659 Broad St. Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 764 South Broadway—Geneva, Ohio, LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ann & Government Streets—Mobile, Alabama, LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Apex Drug Stores, Inc. Broadview and Wallings—Broadview Heights Ohio, Inc. . . . . . . Central Avenue & Main Street Petal—MS, LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . Eagle Managed Care Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Eckerd Corporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EDC Drug Stores, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Eighth and Water Streets—Urichsville, Ohio, LLC . . . . . . . . . . . England Street—Asheland Corporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fairground, LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GDF, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Genovese Drug Stores, Inc. Gettysburg and Hoover—Dayton, Ohio, LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Harco, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . JCG (PJC) USA, LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . JCG Holdings (USA), Inc. K&B Alabama Corporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . K&B Louisiana Corporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . K&B Mississippi Corporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . K&B Services, Incorporated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . K&B Tennessee Corporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . K&B Texas Corporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . K&B, Incorporated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Keystone Centers, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lakehurst and Broadway Corporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Maxi Drug North, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Maxi Drug South, L.P. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Maxi Drug, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Maxi Green, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mayfield & Chillicothe Roads—Chesterland, LLC . . . . . . . . . . . Munson & Andrews, LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Name Rite, LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Northline & Dix—Toledo—Southgate, LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . P.J.C. Distribution, Inc. P.J.C. Realty Co., Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Patton Drive and Navy Boulevard Property Corporation . . . . . . . Paw Paw Lake Road & Paw Paw Avenue-Coloma, Michigan, LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PDS-1 Michigan, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Perry Distributors, Inc. Virginia Delaware Michigan Alabama Ohio Washington Ohio New Jersey Ohio Delaware Michigan Ohio Delaware Delaware Delaware North Carolina Delaware Virginia Virginia Maryland Delaware Ohio Alabama Delaware Delaware Alabama Louisiana Mississippi Louisiana Tennessee Texas Delaware Pennsylvania New Jersey Delaware Delaware Delaware Vermont Ohio Delaware Delaware Michigan Delaware Delaware Florida Delaware Michigan Michigan Company (Name in which such subsidiary conducts business if other than corporate name): State of Incorporation or Organization Perry Drug Stores, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PJC Dorchester Realty LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PJC East Lyme Realty LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PJC Haverhill Realty LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PJC Hermitage Realty LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PJC Hyde Park Realty LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PJC Lease Holdings, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PJC Manchester Realty LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PJC Mansfield Realty LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PJC New London Realty LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PJC of Massachusetts, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PJC of Rhode Island, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PJC of Vermont, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PJC Peterborough Realty LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PJC Providence Realty LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PJC Realty MA, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PJC Realty N.E. LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PJC Revere Realty LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PJC Special Realty Holdings, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ram—Utica, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . RDS Detroit, Inc. READ’s Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rite Aid Drug Palace, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Funding, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rite Aid of Alabama, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rite Aid of Connecticut, Inc. Rite Aid of Delaware, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rite Aid of Florida, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rite Aid of Georgia, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rite Aid of Illinois, Inc. Rite Aid of Indiana, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rite Aid of Kentucky, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rite Aid of Maine, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rite Aid of Maryland, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rite Aid of Massachusetts, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rite Aid of Michigan, Inc. Rite Aid of New Hampshire, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rite Aid of New Jersey, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rite Aid of New York, Inc. Rite Aid of North Carolina, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rite Aid of Ohio, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rite Aid of Pennsylvania, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rite Aid of South Carolina, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rite Aid of Tennessee, Inc. Rite Aid of Vermont, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rite Aid of Virginia, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rite Aid of Washington, D.C., Inc. Rite Aid of West Virginia, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rite Aid Online Store Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rite Aid Payroll Management Inc. Michigan Delaware Delaware Delaware Delaware Delaware Delaware Delaware Delaware Delaware Massachusetts Rhode Island Vermont Delaware Delaware Massachusetts Delaware Delaware Delaware Michigan Michigan Maryland Delaware Delaware Delaware Alabama Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Illinois Indiana Kentucky Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan New Hampshire New Jersey New York North Carolina Ohio Pennsylvania South Carolina Tennessee Vermont Virginia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Washington DC West Virginia Delaware Delaware Company (Name in which such subsidiary conducts business if other than corporate name): State of Incorporation or Organization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rite Aid Realty Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rite Aid Rome Distribution Center, Inc. Rite Aid Services, LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rite Aid Specialty Pharmacy LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rite Aid Transport, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rite Fund, Inc. Rite Investments Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rx Choice, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Seven Mile and Evergreen—Detroit, LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Silver Springs Road—Baltimore, Maryland/One, LLC . . . . . . . . . Silver Springs Road—Baltimore, Maryland/Two, LLC . . . . . . . . . State & Fortification Streets—Jackson, Mississippi, LLC . . . . . . . State Street and Hill Road—Gerard, Ohio, LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . The Jean Coutu Group (PJC) USA, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The Lane Drug Company . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Thrift Drug Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Thrifty Corporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Thrifty PayLess, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Tyler and Sanders Roads—Birmingham, Alabama, LLC . . . . . . . Delaware New York Delaware Delaware Delaware Delaware Delaware Delaware Michigan Delaware Delaware Delaware Delaware Delaware Ohio Delaware California California Delaware Exhibit 23 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM We consent to the incorporation by reference in (i) the Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 on Form S-3 to Registration Statement No. 333-64950 on Form S-1 and Registration Statement No. 333-181657 on Form S-3 and (ii) Registration Statement Nos. 333-61734, 333-107824, 333-124725, 333-146531, 333-167720 and 333-182320 on Forms S-8 and of our reports dated April 23, 2013, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule of Rite Aid Corporation and subsidiaries, and the effectiveness of Rite Aid Corporation and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Rite Aid Corporation for the year ended March 2, 2013. /s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP Philadelphia, Pennsylvania April 23, 2013 Exhibit 31.1 I, John T. Standley, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify that: CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Rite Aid Corporation (the ‘‘Registrant’’); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (‘‘the Exchange Act’’)) and internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) for the Registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and d. Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors: a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. Date: April 23, 2013 By: /s/ JOHN T. STANDLEY John T. Standley Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER I, Frank G. Vitrano, Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Administration Officer, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Rite Aid Corporation (the ‘‘Registrant’’); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (‘‘the Exchange Act’’)) and internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) for the Registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and d. Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors: a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. Date: April 23, 2013 By: /s/ FRANK G. VITRANO Frank G. Vitrano Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Administration Officer Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Exhibit 32 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Rite Aid Corporation (the ‘‘Company’’) for the annual period ended March 2, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), John T. Standley, as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Frank G. Vitrano, as Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Administrative Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ JOHN T. STANDLEY Name: John T. Standley Title: Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer Date: April 23, 2013 /s/ FRANK G. VITRANO Name: Frank G. Vitrano Title: Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Administration Officer Date: April 23, 2013 

Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above