Quarterlytics / RM plc

RM plc

rm.l · LSE
Claim this profile
Ticker rm.l
Exchange LSE
Sector
Industry
Employees 1644
← All annual reports
FY2014 Annual Report · RM plc
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
R

M

p

l

c

A

n

n

u

a

l

R

e

p

o

r

t

a

n

d

F

i

n

a

n

c

i

a

l

S

t

a

t

e

m

e

n

t

s

–

Y

e

a

r

e

n

d

e

d

3

0

N

o

v

e

m

b

e

r

2

0

1

4

Technology
and resources
for education

RM plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 
Year ended 30 November 2014

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The RM plc group of businesses 
creates and maintains an extensive 
range of innovative solutions and 
services - all designed or selected 
to meet the specific needs of 
educational users.

The RM group comprises the following divisions:

RM Resources

RM Education

This division comprises two operating businesses: 
TTS and SpaceKraft. TTS provides a wide range of 
resources for use in schools and other educational 
settings. TTS is a leading provider of physical resources 
to UK schools, with over 14,000 product lines and an 
established leadership position in Primary and Early Years 
age groups. SpaceKraft is a leading provider of resources 
and immersive environments to meet the specific 
requirements of learners with Special Educational Needs.

RM Results

Formerly known as Assessment and Data Services, 
RM Results supplies government ministries, exam 
boards and professional awarding organisations with 
technology and expertise to improve efficiency, accuracy 
and clarity in the assessment cycle, both in the UK and 
internationally. This includes the systems required to 
provide the ‘league tables’ for English schools.

RM Results is a business that provides products and 
services that include secure, innovative systems for 
creating high-stakes exams and tests, onscreen testing, 
onscreen marking and the management and analysis 
of educational data.

Formerly known as Education Technology, 
the division provides technology-based software 
and services, specifically designed for UK schools 
and other educational establishments, across the 
following categories:

Services

Outsourcing, support and implementation services, 
including managed services, onsite support, 
telephone support and consultancy services.

Infrastructure Solutions

Network software, tools and infrastructure services, 
such as the Community Connect network and device 
management tools and virtualisation.

Digital Platforms and Content

Access to curriculum resources and school management 
solutions, including RM Integris school management 
systems, RM Unify ‘launch pad to the cloud’, RM Books 
e-book system, RM Easimaths and RM Easiteach.

Internet

The provision of broadband and e-safety solutions.

Contents

Overview

02 

04 

Chairman’s Statement

Strategic Report

Governance

14 

16 

21 

28 

34 

Directors’ Biographies

Directors’ Report

Corporate Governance Report

Audit Committee Report

Remuneration Report

Financial Statements

46 

49 

50 

51 

52 

53 

54 

55 

56 

57 

96 

Independent Auditor’s Report

Consolidated Income Statement

Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity

Consolidated Balance Sheet

Consolidated Cash Flow Statement

Company Statement of Changes in Equity

Company Balance Sheet

Company Cash Flow Statement

Notes to the Financial Statements

Shareholder Information

01

Chairman’s 
Statement

2014 has been a good year for RM plc. Two of RM’s three 
divisions produced encouraging organic growth and all 
three showed further improvements in annual operating 
margins. Trading performance, which is detailed below, 
showed overall Group revenues down as anticipated, 
although this was combined with improvements in 
profitability, together with good cash generation.

RM Resources (formerly Education Resources), the largest 
contributor of profit to the Group, had an excellent year. 
TTS generated strong organic growth based on market 
share gains and achieved a further increase in already 
strong margins, whilst the small SpaceKraft business is 
no longer loss making.

RM Results (formerly Assessment and Data Services) 
secured new customers and delivered top-line growth 
and improving margins.

The reshaping of RM Education (formerly 
Education Technology) continues. This year saw 
the successful execution of the move away from the 
manufacture and sale of hardware devices. A new 
managing director was appointed to the division 
and priority areas within services and software 
have been identified.

£14.7 million as a special dividend and £8.0 million into 
a new escrow account to be applied to reducing risks 
associated with the Defined Benefit Pension Scheme 
which is now closed to accrual of benefits.

The Group has had four years of over 100% conversion of 
operating profit to cash generated from operations. It is 
anticipated that the Group will remain cash generating 
at an operating level, albeit at lower levels of cash 
conversion due to the run-down of a favourable working 
capital position related to long-term contracts.

The Board is recommending a final dividend of 3.04 pence 
per share which would constitute, at 4.00 pence per share 
in total, an increase of 21% over the prior year (excluding 
the impact of the 16.00p per share special dividend). 
Over time, the Board will adopt a progressive dividend 
policy towards a more appropriate level of dividend cover.

In the year ahead, we are confident that our two growing 
divisions will continue to perform well. RM Education, 
with a more focussed business and reduced cost-base, 
will take further steps towards building a secure platform 
for development.

The Group has a strong balance sheet, with cash and 
short-term deposits at the year end of £47.9 million 
(2013: £63.2 million). This was after payment of 

John Poulter 
Chairman 
2 February 2015

02

Two of RM’s 
three divisions 
produced encouraging 
organic growth and all 
three showed further 
improvements in annual 
operating margins.

John Poulter 
Chairman 

03

 
Strategic 
Report

RM’s objective is to create shareholder 
value through the provision of 
resources, software and services 
to the education sector.

The strategies by which the Group pursues this objective are specific to the 
businesses within the Group and are addressed in the Divisional Reviews 
contained later in this report. 

04

We understand the need to 
balance customer success and 
employee satisfaction with 
long-term shareholder return.

David Brooks 
Chief Executive Officer

05

 
16.00 pence per share was paid at the same time as the 
final dividend in April 2014.

Defined Benefit Pension Scheme

The RM Defined Benefit Pension Scheme was closed to 
new entrants in 2003. An agreement was reached with 
the Trustees to close the Scheme to future accrual of 
benefits from 31 October 2012. At 30 November 2014 
the IAS 19R scheme deficit (pre-tax) was £26.8 million 
(2013: £15.8 million). The principal reason for the 
deterioration in the balance sheet position was an 
increase in liabilities due to reduced corporate bond 
yields which are used to determine the liability discount 
rate. In addition, as explained below, an insurance 
policy was purchased in the year with the price paid 
being higher than the IAS 19R value of liabilities insured, 
partially offset by better than assumed returns on Scheme 
assets and the shortfall contributions paid by the Group. 
The triennial valuation of the Scheme’s position at 
31 May 2012 for statutory funding purposes showed a 
Scheme deficit of £53.5 million. A deficit recovery plan 
over 15 years was agreed with the Trustees for future 
annual deficit recovery payments of £3.6 million, these 
amounts being guaranteed by the Parent Company. 
The Group also pays the Scheme’s expenses, including 
the Pension Protection Fund levy. 

An escrow account was established in the year to be 
utilised for initiatives to reduce the risks related to 
the Scheme. These funds are held jointly between 
RM Education Ltd, the principal employer, and the 
Trustee for the sole purpose of funding risk reduction or 
risk management exercises for the Scheme. £8.0 million 
was paid into this account in 2014 in addition to the 
annual deficit recovery payments to the Scheme. 
Total cash payments including expenses for the year were 
£11.8 million (2013: £4.4 million).

In October 2014, £4.7 million of the funds in escrow were 
paid to the Scheme to help fund a pension buy-in. The 
transaction will produce an income stream to the Scheme 
which closely matches payments to all 165 existing 
pensioners. Such a buy-in largely eliminates the inflation, 
interest rate and longevity risks associated with these 
pension benefits. The transaction coverage represented 
9% of the Scheme members and around 13% of the 
total Scheme liability. The insurance premium payable 
under the buy-in agreement was £30.7 million. The 
insurance premium was funded by way of £26.0 million 
of fixed income assets from the Scheme and £4.7 million 
paid from the escrow account. This leaves £3.3 million 
remaining in the escrow account to be used for future risk 
reduction exercises.

Group Financial Performance

Group revenue declined by 22.6% to £202.5 million 
(2013: £261.8 million).

To provide a better understanding of underlying business 
performance, the Income Statement amortisation 
charges relating to acquisition related intangible assets, 
share-based payment charges and other non-cash 
items of an exceptional nature have been disclosed in 
an adjustments column in the Income Statement to give 
‘Adjusted’ results.

Adjusted operating profit margins increased again this 
year from 6.6% in 2013 to 9.1%. Adjusted operating profit 
increased to £18.5 million (2013: £17.2 million). The Group 
generated an unadjusted statutory profit before tax of 
£15.8 million (2013: £9.4 million). 

The total tax charge within the Income Statement for the 
year was £4.2 million (2013: £3.3 million). The Group’s 
tax charge for the period, measured as a percentage of 
profit before tax, was 26% (2013: 35%). This decrease 
is principally due to the reduction in the UK corporate 
tax rate and a significant prior year adjustment in 2013, 
offset by a lower proportion of ‘Adjustments’ to operating 
profit being non-tax deductible. Adjusted basic earnings 
per share were 16.4p (2013: 12.6p). Statutory basic 
earnings per share were 13.9 pence (2013: 6.7 pence) 
and statutory diluted earnings per share were 13.0 pence 
(2013: 6.6 pence).

RM delivered another year of good cash generation 
with cash generated from operations for the year of 
£19.1 million (2013: £34.7 million). Cash and short-term 
deposits decreased to £47.9 million (2013: £63.2 million) 
principally due to the payment in the year of a 
£14.7 million special dividend and the payment of 
£8.0 million into a pension escrow account described 
in more detail below. The lowest cash position during 
the year due to seasonal cash flows was £25.9 million 
(2013: £33.0 million).

Cash generated from operations is expected to be 
less than operating profit in coming years, reflecting 
the reversal of a favourable working capital position 
related to long-term contracts and utilisation of 
property-related provisions.

Dividends

The total dividend paid and proposed for the year 
has been increased by 21% to 4.00 pence per share 
(2013: 3.30 pence excluding the 16.00p special 
dividend). This comprises an already paid interim 
dividend of 0.96 pence per share and, subject to 
shareholder approval, a proposed final dividend of 
3.04 pence per share. The estimated total cost of normal 
dividends paid and proposed for 2014 is £3.2 million 
(2013: £3.0 million). In addition, a special dividend of 

06

Divisional Review

TTS UK Distributors

The Group is structured in three operating divisions, 
each with its own managing director and management 
team. Some staff functions are provided centrally. 
Approximately 28% of Group headcount is based in India, 
providing support services and software development to 
the operating divisions.

RM Resources
The RM Resources division, formerly known as Education 
Resources, comprises two operating businesses: TTS 
and SpaceKraft.

TTS provides resources used in schools mainly through 
a direct marketing business model with goods supplied 
from large, centralised UK distribution centres. Products 
supplied are a mix of third party branded and TTS 
branded items manufactured by a network of third 
party suppliers.

The division’s strategy is to grow market share in the 
provision of resources to the UK schools, early years and 
Special Educational Needs markets via direct catalogue 
and online sales and marketing channels as well as 
through selective supply of products to UK trade and 
international schools and distributors.

Divisional revenue increased by 16% to £62.8 million 
(2013: £54.0 million) in a flat UK market, with strong 
UK market share gains and an 18% increase in 
international revenues. 

Divisional adjusted operating margins increased to 16.4% 
compared with 13.3% in the prior year reflecting the 
benefits of growth and the realisation of efficiency gains 
from systems investments made in prior years. Adjusted 
operating profit was £10.3 million (2013: £7.2 million). 

Further investment is being made in direct marketing 
across online and traditional channels and in export 
business development to support continued growth.

TTS UK Direct Marketing

Revenue from TTS UK direct marketing increased by 19% 
to £46.2 million (2013: £38.8 million) with a particularly 
strong performance from products targeted at the new 
English primary school curriculum. The proportion of 
sales through online channels showed further increases 
in the year.

TTS International

Revenue from international sales to overseas resellers and 
to international schools increased by 20% to £8.5 million 
(2013: £7.0 million). This was driven by growth in Europe, 
the Middle East and the Americas.

Revenue from sales to UK trade partners decreased by 7% 
to £4.4 million. 

SpaceKraft

SpaceKraft supplies products and installation services 
for the Special Educational Needs market. Products are 
a mix of own-brand manufactured items and third party 
sourced. Sales of installations are made direct with other 
products supplied through catalogues and online.

Under the leadership of a new management team 
appointed at the end of 2013, the recent declining 
trend in revenue was reversed with growth of 11% to 
£3.7 million (2013: £3.4 million). The business is no 
longer loss-making.

RM Results
The RM Results business, formerly known as Assessment 
and Data Services, provides onscreen exam marking 
(e-marking), onscreen testing (e-assessment) and the 
management and analysis of educational data. Its 
customers include government ministries, exam boards 
and professional awarding bodies around the world, 
improving the efficiency, accuracy and clarity of the 
assessment cycle.

The strategy in the assessment side of the business is 
to expand the scope of services to existing customers 
through the provision of leading software products 
and services and to win new customers in both the 
UK and overseas markets. Software and services are 
provided through a combination of proprietary and 
third party, in-house and outsourced arrangements. 
Internationally the business is anticipated to evolve 
through partnerships and software licensing rather than 
as a service-based activity.

Revenue increased by 5% to £27.8 million (2013: 
£26.5 million). Adjusted operating margins increased 
further to 16.7% (2013: 16.1%). Adjusted operating profit 
was £4.6 million (2013: £4.3 million).

The business was successful in securing a contract with 
the Caribbean Examinations Council, a new e-marking 
customer. The summer 2014 e-marking pilot with the 
education charity AQA was completed successfully. RM 
Results has subsequently been appointed as one of two 
preferred suppliers for long-term e-marking contracts.

Internationally, the business is pursuing opportunities 
for the onscreen marking of paper-based exams. In the 
UK, examination and curricula changes introduced by 
the English Department for Education have reduced 
the number of exam retakes, while a move away from 
modular courses to final exam-based assessment will 
also impact the business in the medium term. There is a 
long-term trend from paper-based to onscreen testing, 

07

though the adoption of such systems for school-based 
examinations is low.

The educational data side of the business is dependent 
on one public sector customer, the Department for 
Education. The National Pupil Database and RAISE Online 
contracts, which include the capture and publishing of 
data for the school performance tables in England, were 
extended during the year following the agreement to stop 
work on the School Performance Data Programme.

RM Education
Formerly known as Education Technology, RM Education 
is a UK-focussed business supplying IT software and 
services to schools and colleges. The sale of personal 
computing devices ceased from December 2013 and 
manufacturing of hardware devices ceased in June 2014.

The divisional strategy, under a new managing director 
who was appointed in May 2014, is to continue to 
develop and encourage adoption of its portfolio of 
software products and services through new and existing 
propositions which meet the needs of UK schools.

Market trends affecting the business include the demand 
from schools for solutions which are low-cost yet can 
cope with an increasingly diverse range of hardware and 
software. In addition, purchasing decisions in England 
have been increasingly devolved to schools and academy 
groups and away from central government and local 
authorities. This required a change in the way the division 
engages with its market and the review has resulted in an 
increased focus on the top c.2,000 customers. 

As anticipated, continued funding pressures in the 
UK education sector and the change of strategy away 
from selling hardware devices led to overall revenue in 
RM Education declining by 38% to £111.9 million (2013: 
£181.2 million). However, adjusted operating profit 
margins increased again this year from 5.2% to 6.9%. Staff 
cost reductions were implemented ahead of plan over the 
year and write downs in the value of remaining inventory 
have been significantly less than originally expected. The 
hardware devices business delivered higher revenue with 
lower costs than planned but this level of contribution will 
not be repeated in future. In addition, the Defined Benefit 
Pension Scheme was closed to future accrual of benefit in 
October 2012 and the costs relating to the Defined Benefit 
Pension Scheme (£1.3 million in 2014 and £0.9 million in 
2013) are no longer allocated to individual divisions but 
are shown as unallocated costs. Adjusted operating profit 
was £7.7 million (2013: £9.4 million).

The performance of the four retained product groups and 
the personal computing hardware business, which has 
been exited, are reviewed below.

Services

These include implementation, management and 
support of IT infrastructure within schools and colleges, 
including Building Schools for the Future (BSF) contracts. 
As anticipated, revenues in 2014 again declined with 
a reduction in new school openings under the BSF 
programme. Services revenues decreased by 29% to £61.2 
million (2013: £85.7 million).

Many services are subject to long-term project accounting 
policies and revenues and profits were positively affected 
by good operational performance and cost control in 
completing BSF contracts.

Priority areas of focus are on retention of existing 
customers at the end of current contracts and on winning 
individual school sites.

Digital Platforms and Content

These include established products such as RM Integris 
(RM’s cloud-based school management system), RM 
Easimaths curriculum software and RM EasiTeach 
whole class teaching software as well as newer offerings 
including RM Books and RM Unify. Digital Platforms and 
Content revenues increased by 4% to £7.6 million.

Revenue from RM Integris increased following good 
market share gains including Oxfordshire, won in 2013. 
The strategy is to increase RM’s market share in a market 
dominated by a large competitor and with low levels of 
switching between suppliers. RM Integris is a cloud-based 
Software as a Service offering with annual licences.

RM Unify is a product launched by RM in 2013 as a 
technology solution to allow customers easy access 
to the varied digital, cloud-based, educational specific 
content and materials that are now available. RM Unify 
incorporates a cloud-based ‘launchpad’ and ‘application 
store’ enabling schools to procure and access a wide 
variety of digital content in a secure, single sign-on 
environment. Revenue is derived from annual school 
subscriptions and from fees from sales of third party 
applications. The division’s strategy is generally not to 
develop its own curriculum software but to provide the 
best of what is available from third parties via RM Unify.

RM Books provides the first e-book solution designed 
for UK schools. The majority of leading UK textbook 
publishers are now participating, with approximately 
16,000 titles currently available. The service is free to 
schools with RM taking a share of revenue from content 
sold through the system. The market penetration of 
e-books in consumer markets has increased dramatically 
in recent years but e-book adoption in schools is slow 
and revenue is still limited. The current focus is on 
demonstrating the educational value added.

0808

Priority areas of focus are on winning new RM Integris 
customers and on embedding and expanding system 
usage amongst existing RM Unify customers.

Network Solutions

Network Solutions includes sales of RM’s Community 
Connect and Ranger network management tools and 
related provision of hardware such as routers and wireless 
systems. Existing products are typically sold as perpetual 
licences with annual maintenance contracts. Revenues 
decreased by 45% to £8.6 million (2013: £15.7 million) as 
demand for established products reduced year on year 
with reduced school capital budgets.

Sales of RM Neon, a new generation of network and 
device monitoring tools launched in the year, have 
been disappointing. 

The focus is on ensuring that existing customers 
are on the latest version of our software and on 
developing enhanced propositions which meet 
users’ evolving requirements.

Internet

RM is a broadband and e-safety service provider to 
approximately 5,000 schools. RM designs and manages 
networks, procuring and integrating bandwidth and 
e-safety products from third parties. Competitors include 
regional educational aggregators and some of the large 
telecom providers who sell to schools directly. The 
devolution of purchasing decisions to individual schools 
is reducing the likelihood of local authorities procuring 
services centrally on their behalf.

This business is dominated by one large regional 
consortium which accounts for a large share of its 
revenue. This relationship is underpinned by a contract 
which runs until 2018 though volumes are variable.

Revenues decreased by 14% to £16.7 million 
(2013: £19.3 million) reflecting the end of some regional 
consortium contracts and the movement from private to 
public networks.

The business’ broadband connectivity and e-safety 
propositions were streamlined and simplified during the 
year. The priority now is on growing customer numbers.

09

Personal Computing Hardware

Revenue derived from hardware (RM-branded and third 
party computing products, together with maintenance 
and warranty and other third party classroom equipment) 
decreased by 67% to £17.8 million (2013: £53.1 million) 
with RM’s exit of the personal computing devices business 
over the course of FY14. 

Revenue was significantly higher than planned and the 
costs of exit, including obsolescent inventory, were much 
lower than expected. These benefits will not 
recur in future years.

Third party partners Misco and Kelway have been 
appointed to provide hardware devices to customers, 
where still required under existing contracts and bundled 
procurement processes, and to manage existing warranty 
and maintenance obligations respectively.

RM India
As at 30 November 2014, RM’s operation in Trivandrum 
accounted for 28% of Group headcount (2013: 25%).

The Indian operation provides services solely to RM Group 
companies. Activities include software development, 
customer and operational support and back office shared 
service support (e.g. customer order entry, IT, finance and 
HR) and administration.

Employees

Average Group headcount for the year was 1,870 
(2013: 2,148). At 30 November 2014 headcount was 1,778, 
a 12% reduction from 2,018 at 30 November 2013. The 
November 2014 headcount comprises 1,568 permanent 
and 210 temporary or contract staff, of which 1,274 were 
located in the UK and 504 in India.

The following table sets out a more detailed summary of 
the permanent staff employed as at 30 November 2014:

Male

Female

Directors

2 (100%)

0 (0%)

Senior Managers 
(excluding Directors)

45 (80%)

11 (20%)

All employees

1,037 (66%)

531 (34%)

The Group is committed to offering equal employment 
opportunities and its policies are designed to attract, 
retain and motivate the best staff regardless of gender, 
sexual orientation, race, religion, age or disability. The 
Group gives proper consideration to applications for 
employment when these are received from disabled 
persons and will employ them in posts whenever suitable 
vacancies arise. Employees who become disabled are 
retained whenever possible through retraining, use of 
appropriate technology and making available suitable 
alternative employment.

The Group encourages the participation of all employees 
in the operation and development of the business and 
has a policy of regular communications. The Group 
incentivises employees and senior management 
through the payment of bonuses linked to performance 
objectives, together with the other components of 
remuneration detailed in the Remuneration Report.

The Group has a wide range of other written policies, 
designed to ensure that it operates in a legal and ethical 
manner. These include policies related to health and 
safety, ‘whistle blowing’, anti-bribery and corruption, 
business gifts, grievance, career planning, parental leave, 
systems and network security. All of RM’s employment 
policies are published internally.

Going Concern

The Directors, having made appropriate enquiries, 
consider that the Company and the Group have adequate 
resources to continue in operational existence for the 
foreseeable future and that therefore it is appropriate 
to adopt the going concern basis in preparing the 
Financial Statements.

Environmental Matters

The Group’s impact on the environment, and its 
policy in relation to such matters, are noted in the 
Directors’ Report.

1010

Principal Risks and Uncertainties

The management of the business and the execution of the Group’s strategy are subject to a number of risks. Risks are reviewed 
by the Audit Committee and Board and appropriate processes put in place to monitor and mitigate them. The key business 
risks for the Group are set out in the table below:

Risk

Description

Mitigation

Public policy

The majority of RM’s business is funded 
from UK government sources. Changes in 
political administration, or changes in policy 
priorities, might result in a reduction in 
education spending.

UK government funding in the education 
sector is constrained by fiscal policy.

Global economic conditions might result 
in a reduction in budgets available for 
public spending generally and education 
spending specifically.

Education practice

Education practices and priorities may change 
and, as a result, RM’s products and services 
may no longer meet customer requirements.

The Group seeks to understand the education 
policy environment by regular monitoring of 
policy positions and by building relationships 
with education policy makers.

The Group’s three divisions have 
diverse revenue streams and 
product/service offerings.

The Group’s strategy is to focus on areas 
of education spend which are important 
to meet customers’ objectives. Where 
individual business’ revenues are in decline, 
management seek to ensure that the cost 
base supporting these is adjusted accordingly.

The Group seeks to maintain knowledge of 
current education practice and priorities 
by maintaining close relationships 
with customers.

Operational execution

RM provides sophisticated products and 
services, which require a high level of 
technical expertise to develop and support, 
and on which its customers place a high level 
of reliance.

RM is engaged in the delivery of large, multi-
year education projects, typically involving the 
development and integration of complex ICT 
systems, and may have liability for failure to 
deliver on time.

The Group invests in maintaining a high level 
of technical expertise. 

Internal management control processes are 
in place to govern the delivery of projects, 
including regular reviews by relevant 
management. The operational and financial 
performance of projects, including future 
obligations, the expected costs of these 
and potential risks are regularly monitored 
by management.

11

Risk

Description

Mitigation

Data and 
business continuity

RM is engaged in storing and processing 
sensitive data, where accuracy, privacy and 
security are important.

The Group would be significantly impacted 
if, as a result of a disaster, one of its 
major buildings, systems or infrastructure 
components could not function for a long 
period of time.

People

RM’s business depends on 
highly-skilled employees.

The Group’s IS function has invested in 
developing its Data Centres, and has been 
successfully certified to ISO/IEC 27001:2005 
for the provision of systems, information and 
hosting services.

The Group has established an Information 
Security Committee to oversee the security 
aspects of the Group’s information systems. 
This covers data integrity and protection, 
defence against external threats and 
disaster recovery.

The Group seeks to protect itself against the 
consequences of a disaster by implementing a 
series of back-up and safety measures.

The Group has property and business 
interruption insurance cover.

The Group seeks to be an attractive 
employer and regularly monitors the 
engagement of its employees. The Group 
has talent management and career 
planning programmes.

Innovation

The IT market is subject to rapid, and 
often unpredictable, change. As a result 
of inappropriate technology choices, the 
Group’s products and services might become 
unattractive to its customer base.

The Group monitors technology and market 
developments and invests to keep its existing 
products and services and sales methods 
up-to-date as well as seeking out new 
opportunities and initiatives. 

Dependence on 
key contracts

The Group’s continued success depends 
on developing and/or sourcing a stream of 
innovative and effective products for the 
education market and marketing these 
effectively to customers.

The performance of the RM Education 
and RM Results divisions are dependent 
on the winning and extension of long-
term contracts with government, local 
authorities, examination boards and 
commercial customers.

The Group works with teachers and 
educators to understand opportunities 
and requirements.

The Group invests in maintaining a high level 
of technical expertise and on building effective 
working relationships with its customers. 
The Group has in place a range of customer 
satisfaction programmes, which include 
management processes designed to address 
the causes of customers’ dissatisfaction.

1212

Risk

Pension

Description

Mitigation

The Group operates a defined benefit pension 
scheme in the UK, which is in deficit. The 
scheme deficit can adversely impact the 
net assets position of the trading subsidiary 
RM Education Ltd.

The Scheme was closed to new entrants in 
2003 and closed to future accrual of benefits 
in October 2012.

A pension escrow account was established 
in 2014 to fund risk mitigation exercises. The 
first of these was completed in October 2014 
with the purchase a pensioner buy-in from an 
insurance company.

The Group evaluates risk mitigation proposals 
with the Scheme trustee.

Financial – 
foreign exchange

The Group is exposed to foreign currency 
risk with respect to purchases of goods in US 
Dollars and from its operations in India.

The Group enters into US Dollar and Indian 
Rupee denominated hedging contracts with 
approved banking organisations.

The Group is exposed to counterparty risk on 
liquid assets.

The Group’s ability to pay dividends to 
shareholders depends on having sufficient 
distributable reserves in the holding company, 
RM plc. Additional losses incurred as a 
result of significant increases in the pension 
scheme deficit could further impair the ability 
of RM Education Ltd to pay dividends up 
to RM plc.

Limits are placed on the level of deposit with 
any one counterparty. Bank selection takes 
into account credit ratings.

The Group monitors the level of distributable 
reserves in subsidiary companies and 
considers their ability to make dividend 
payments to the holding company.

Financial – 
liquidity 

Financial – 
capital

David Brooks 
Director 
2 February 2015

13

 
Directors’ 
Biographies

John Poulter
Chairman (a) (r) (n)

Iain McIntosh
Chief Financial Officer

Iain McIntosh MA, FCA (51) joined RM on 30 November 2009 
and was appointed to the Board as a Director on 
1 April 2010. Before joining RM, he held equivalent 
positions in listed and private equity backed IT and 
service companies, most recently as CFO of FTSE 250 
listed Axon Group plc. Mr McIntosh initially qualified as 
a Chartered Accountant and then spent four years as a 
management consultant with McKinsey & Co.

Patrick Martell
Independent Non-Executive Director (a) (r) (n)

Patrick Martell (51) joined the Board on 1 January 2014 as 
a Non-Executive Director. Mr Martell is a former Group CEO 
of St Ives plc, having joined in 1980. He was appointed 
to the Board of St Ives plc on 1 August 2003 and held 
the position of Managing Director, Media Products and 
Managing Director, UK Operations from 2006 to 2009, 
at which point he was appointed Group CEO. Mr Martell 
is currently Chief Executive of the Business Intelligence 
Division of Informa plc.

Deena Mattar
Senior Independent Non-Executive Director (a) (r) (n)

Deena Mattar FCA (49) joined the Board on 1 June 2011 
as a Non-Executive Director and was appointed Chair of 
the Audit Committee on 26 March 2012. She served as 
Group Finance Director of Kier Group plc from 2001 to 
2010, having joined the Group in 1998 as Finance Director 
of Kier National. Prior to this she held senior positions at 
KPMG. Ms Mattar is also a Non-Executive Director of Wates 
Group Ltd and, until its recent sale to Schneider Electric, 
she was a Non-Executive Director and Chairman of the 
Audit Committee for Invensys plc. She is also a former 
Non-Executive Director of Lamprell plc.

John Poulter (72) was appointed as Non-Executive 
Chairman of RM plc on 1 May 2013. He is also Chairman 
of the Nomination Committee of the Board. Mr Poulter is 
currently Executive Chairman of 4imprint Group plc. He is 
a former Chairman and former Chief Executive of Spectris 
plc, a former Non-Executive Chairman of Filtronic plc and 
a former Non-Executive Chairman of Hampson Industries 
plc. He has also acted as Non-Executive Director to a 
number of public and private companies including 
FTSE 250 constituents BTP plc, RAC plc and Kidde plc.

Lord Andrew Adonis
Independent Non-Executive Director (a) (r) (n)

Lord Andrew Adonis (51) joined the Board on 1 October 
2011. He served 12 years in government as a Minister and 
special adviser, including Secretary of State for Transport, 
Minister for Schools, Head of the No.10 Policy Unit, and 
senior No. 10 adviser on education, public services and 
constitutional reform. Before joining government, he was 
Public Policy Editor of the Financial Times. Lord Adonis is 
also a Non-Executive Director of Dods (Group) plc and a 
number of charitable organisations.

David Brooks
Chief Executive Officer

David Brooks (45) was appointed Chief Executive Officer 
of RM plc on 1 March 2013, having been appointed to 
the Board as Chief Operating Officer on 1 July 2012. 
He originally joined RM, with a degree in computing, on 
the Group’s graduate scheme. He has gained extensive 
experience in the education sector across many parts 
of the RM Group and is an alumnus of the Harvard 
Business School Advanced Management Programme.

Committee membership as at the date of this report.

(a) Audit Committee Member

(r) Remuneration Committee Member

(n) Nomination Committee Member

1414

Two of our three businesses 
are growing and make up 
two thirds of our profit.
Our RM Education business 
is on the road to recovery.

David Brooks 
Chief Executive Officer

15

 
Directors’ 
Report

The Directors submit their report together with the 
audited consolidated and Company Financial Statements 
for the year ended 30 November 2014.

The Corporate Governance Report is incorporated into 
this report by reference.

Dividends
The total dividend paid and proposed for the year 
has been increased by 21% to 4.00 pence per share 
(2013: 3.30 pence). This comprises an interim dividend of 
0.96 pence per share paid in September 2014 and, subject 
to shareholder approval, a final dividend of 3.04 pence 
per share.

Treasury and foreign exchange
The Group has in place appropriate treasury policies 
and procedures, which are approved by the Board. 
The treasury function manages interest rates for both 
borrowings and cash deposits for the Group and is also 
responsible for ensuring there is sufficient headroom 
against any banking covenants contained within its credit 
facilities, and for ensuring there are appropriate facilities 
available to meet the Group’s strategic plans.

In order to mitigate and manage exchange rate risk, 
the Group routinely enters into forward contracts and 
continues to monitor exchange rate risk in respect of 
foreign currency exposures.

All these treasury policies and procedures are regularly 
monitored and reviewed. It is the Group’s policy not 
to undertake speculative transactions which create 
additional exposures over and above those arising from 
normal trading activity.

Environmental policy and reporting
The Group recognises that its activities must be carried 
out in an environmentally friendly and compliant 
manner. Good standards of environmental performance 
are adopted to minimise the potential negative 
environmental impact of products and processes and 
also to promote sustainability. These actions include 
efficient utility usage, waste reduction/recycling and use 
of energy saving features in products.

The Group is required to report Scope 1 and 2 emissions 
for all Group companies within the Annual Report 
and has elected to report emissions for the year to 
30 September 2014.

16

Set out below are all of the emission sources required to be reported under the Companies Act 2006 (Strategic Report 
and Directors’ Reports) Regulations 2013.

The GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (revised edition) has been applied. The figures include 
emissions arising from all financially controlled assets, as well as business travel arising from air and other vehicle use.

All emissions factors have been selected from the emissions conversion factors published annually by Defra (which can be 
found at www.gov.uk/measuring-and-reporting-environmental-impacts-guidance-for-businesses).

Emissions by scope

Scope

Source

Country

Tonnes CO2℮

Absolute totals 
Tonnes CO2℮

Tonnes CO2℮

Absolute totals 
Tonnes CO2℮

Year ended 30 September 2014

Year ended 30 September 2013

Scope 1

Air travel

Air travel

Van/car travel

Van/car travel

Gas

Scope 2

Electricity and gas

UK

India

UK

India

UK

UK

Electricity and gas

India

Total

733

397

800

96

758

2,844

730

527

339

1,017

82

846

3,065

798

2,811

3,863

6,674

2,784

3,574 

6,358 

Emissions have also been analysed using an intensity metric, which will enable the Company to monitor how well 
emissions are controlled on an annual basis, independent of fluctuations in the levels of activity. The metric used is 
‘emissions per full-time equivalent (FTE) employee’. The Group’s emissions per employee are shown in the table below:

Tonnes CO2℮/employee

Scope 1

Scope 2

Total

Year ended 
30 September 2014

Year ended 
30 September 2013

1.49

1.91

3.40

1.34

1.84

3.18

Health and safety
The Group has implemented a health and safety management system which aims to continually improve health and safety 
implementation and is designed to meet the requirements of OHSAS 18001. The following objectives are incorporated into the 
management system:

• 

• 

• 

• 

Accident reduction

Raising health and safety awareness

Effective training

Risk reduction and management.

Political donations
Neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries made any political donations or incurred any political expenditure 
during the year.

17

Substantial shareholdings
On 31 January 2015 the Company had received notifications that the following parties were interested in accordance with DTR 5:

Shareholder

No. of 
shares

Percentage of 
Issued Share Capital 
as at 31 January 2015

No. of shares 
Direct

No. of shares 
Indirect

Schroders Investment Management Ltd

15,071,278

18.24%

15,071,278

0

Aberforth Partners

Artemis Investment Management LLP

12,505,033

8,754,376

River and Mercantile Asset Management LLP

5,495,398

The Wellcome Trust Ltd

Majedie Asset Management Ltd

4,798,752

4,174,358

15.13%

10.59%

6.65%

5.81%

5.05%

0

12,505,033

5,740,463

3,013,913

5,495,398

0

0

0

4,798,752

4,174,358

The Takeovers Directive
The Company has one class of share capital, ordinary shares. All the shares rank pari passu. There are no special control rights 
in relation to the Company’s shares. As at 30 November 2014, the RM plc Employee Share Trust owned 2,351,321 ordinary 
shares in the Company (2.85% of the issued share capital); any voting or other similar decisions relating to those shares would 
be taken by the Trustee, who may take account of any recommendation of the Board of the Company.

The Group enters into long-term contracts to supply ICT products and services to its customers. Wherever possible, these 
contracts do not have change of control provisions, but some significant contracts do include such provisions.

In January 2012 the Group entered into a £30 million revolving credit facility with Barclays Bank, which has been extended to 
March 2017. This facility has a change of control provision and is subject to termination in the event of change of control of 
the Company.

Repurchase of own shares
At the Annual General Meeting held on 19 March 2014, members renewed the authority under section 701 of the Companies 
Act 2006 to make market purchases on the London Stock Exchange of up to 8,182,601 ordinary shares, being 10% of the issued 
share capital of the Company. The minimum price which may be paid for each share is the nominal value. The maximum price 
which may be paid for a share is an amount equal to the higher of (1) 5% above the average of the middle market quotations 
of the Company’s ordinary shares as derived from the London Stock Exchange Daily Official List for the five business days 
immediately preceding the day on which such share is contracted to be purchased and (2) the amount stipulated by 
Article 5(1) of the Buy-back and Stabilisation Regulation 2003. This authority has not been used since the Annual General Meeting.

The Directors will seek to renew this authority at the next Annual General Meeting scheduled for 25 March 2015.

Overseas branches
The Group has overseas branches in Italy and Singapore.

Directors
Details of those Directors who have held office during the financial year and up to the date of signing this report and any 
changes since the start of the financial year are given below:

John Poulter 
David Brooks   
Iain McIntosh   
Deena Mattar

Lord Andrew Adonis 
Jo Connell (retired 19 March 2014) 
Patrick Martell (appointed 1 January 2014) 

Biographical details of the current Directors are given on page 14. At the forthcoming Annual General Meeting all continuing 
Directors will stand for re-election in accordance with best practice and guidance set out in the UK Corporate Governance 
Code. The Directors who are proposed for re-election or election have either a letter of appointment or a service contract, 
details of which can be found in the Remuneration Report.

1818

 
 
 
 
 
The Group has provided indemnity insurance for one 
or more of the Directors during the financial year and at 
the date of signing this report. The Directors also have 
the benefit of a Deed of Indemnity in respect of liabilities 
which may attach to them in their capacity as Directors of 
the Company. These provisions are qualifying third party 
indemnity provisions as defined by section 234 of the 
Companies Act 2006.

Independent auditor and disclosure of 
information to auditor
As far as the Directors are aware, there is no relevant 
audit information (as defined by section 418(3) of the 
Companies Act 2006) of which the Company’s auditor is 
unaware and each of the Directors has taken reasonable 
steps in order to make themselves aware of relevant audit 
information and to establish that the Company’s auditor 
is aware of that information.

A resolution to reappoint KPMG LLP as auditor 
of the Company will be proposed at the next 
Annual General Meeting.

Directors’ responsibilities statement
The Directors are responsible for preparing the Annual 
Report, the Remuneration Report and the Financial 
Statements in accordance with applicable UK law 
and regulations.

UK company law requires the Directors to prepare 
financial statements for each financial year. Under that 
law the Directors are required to prepare the Group 
Financial Statements in accordance with International 
Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) as adopted by 
the European Union and have elected to prepare the 
Company Financial Statements on the same basis. 
Under company law the Directors must not approve 
the Financial Statements unless they are satisfied that 
they give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the 
Company and the Group and of the profit or loss of the 
Group for that year.

In preparing those financial statements, the Directors are 
required to:

• 

select suitable accounting policies and then apply 
them consistently;

•  make judgments and estimates that are reasonable 

and prudent;

• 

• 

state whether applicable IFRSs as adopted by the 
European Union have been followed, subject to any 
material departures disclosed and explained in the 
financial statements; and

prepare the financial statements on a going concern 
basis unless it is inappropriate to presume that the 
Group and the Company will continue in business.

The Directors are responsible for keeping proper 
accounting records that are sufficient to show and explain 
the Company’s transactions and disclose with reasonable 
accuracy at any time the financial position of the 
Company and to enable them to ensure that the financial 
statements comply with the Companies Act 2006. They 
are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the 
Group and hence for taking reasonable steps for the 
prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.

Under applicable law and regulations, the Directors 
are also responsible for preparing a Strategic Report, 
Directors’ Report, Remuneration Report, Corporate 
Governance Report and Audit Committee Report that 
complies with that law and those regulations.

Each of the Directors, whose names and functions are 
listed at the front of this report confirm that, to the best of 
their knowledge:

• 

• 

the Group Financial Statements, which have been 
prepared in accordance with IFRSs, as adopted by the 
EU, give a true, balanced and fair view of the assets, 
liabilities, financial position and performance of the 
Group; and

the information contained in pages 04 to 13 of 
this Annual Report includes a true, balanced and fair 
review of the development and performance of the 
business and the position of the Group, together with 
a description of the principal risks and uncertainties 
that it faces.

A copy of the Group Financial Statements is posted on 
the Group’s website www.rmplc.com. The Directors are 
responsible for the maintenance and integrity of the 
Group’s website and the financial information included 
on the website. Information published on the website 
is accessible in many countries with differing legal 
requirements but only legislation in the United Kingdom 
governing the preparation and dissemination of financial 
statements applies to the Group.

Annual General Meeting
The forthcoming Annual General Meeting will be held 
on 25 March 2015 at 140 Eastern Avenue, Milton Park, 
Milton, Abingdon, Oxfordshire OX14 4SB, at the time set 
out in the Annual General Meeting notice. The notice 
of the Annual General Meeting contains the full text of 
resolutions to be proposed.

By Order of the Board

Greg Davidson 
Company Secretary 
2 February 2015

19

20

Corporate 
Governance 
Report

Statement of compliance
The Group has applied the principles set out in the UK Corporate Governance Code 2010 and also the UK Corporate 
Governance Code 2012 (together the “Codes”). The Company has complied with the Codes throughout the 12 month period 
ended 30 November 2014.

Compliance with the UK Corporate Governance Codes 2010 and 2012

Code of Best Practice – Principles

RM Statement of compliance

A

DIRECTORS 

A1

The Role of the Board

Every company should be headed by an effective board, 
which is collectively responsible for the success of 
the company.

The Directors’ responsibilities are outlined in the 
Directors’ Report. The Board meets regularly on a formal 
basis plus additional ad hoc meetings as necessary. 
Further details of the operation of the Board and the 
structure of internal governance arrangements are 
referred to below.

A2

Division of responsibilities 

There should be a clear division of responsibilities at 
the head of the company between the running of the 
board and the executive responsibility for the running of 
the company’s business. No one individual should have 
unfettered powers of decision.

There is a clear distinction between the role of the 
Non-Executive Directors on the Board, which is chaired 
by the Chairman, and the Chief Executive Officer and 
Chief Financial Officer, who have executive responsibility 
for the running of the Company’s business.

A3

The Chairman 

The Chairman is responsible for leadership of the board 
and ensuring its effectiveness on all aspects of its role.

The Chairman sets the Board’s agenda and ensures 
that adequate time is available for the discussion of 
all agenda items. The Chairman promotes a culture of 
openness and debate. He also ensures constructive 
relations between the Executive Directors and the 
Non-Executive Directors. The Chairman ensures 
effective communication with shareholders.

The Chairman meets the independence criteria.

A4

Non-executive Directors 

As part of their role as members of a unitary board, 
non executive directors should constructively challenge 
and help develop proposals on strategy.

The Non-Executive Directors scrutinise strategic 
proposals for the Group and monitor performance on 
an ongoing basis.

21

Code of Best Practice – Principles

RM Statement of compliance

B

EFFECTIVENESS

B1

The composition of the Board

The board and its committees should have 
the appropriate balance of skills, experience, 
independence and knowledge of the company to 
enable them to discharge their respective duties and 
responsibilities effectively.

B2

Appointments to the Board

There should be a formal, rigorous and transparent 
procedure for the appointment of new directors to 
the board.

B3

Commitment

All directors should be able to allocate sufficient 
time to the company to discharge their 
responsibilities effectively.

B4

Development

The Board consists of the Chief Executive Officer 
and Chief Financial Officer plus, currently, four 
Non-Executive Directors including the Chairman. All of 
the Non-Executive Directors are considered by the Board 
to be independent of the management of the Company 
and free from any business or other relationship 
which could materially interfere with the exercise of 
their independent judgment. The Directors have a 
combination of financial, business and educational 
expertise which is suited to the nature of the Company.

A separate Nomination Committee, comprised of all 
Non-Executive Directors, including the Chairman, is 
responsible for identifying and nominating candidates 
to fill Board vacancies. An external search consultancy, 
which had no other connection to the Company, 
assisted with the appointment of Patrick Martell as 
a Non-Executive Director (appointment effective 
1 January 2014).

The Board ensures that on appointment and thereafter 
all Directors have sufficient time to carry out their duties.

All directors should receive induction on joining the 
board and should regularly update and refresh their 
skills and knowledge.

All Non-Executive Directors receive an induction on 
joining the Board. All Non-Executive Directors have 
extensive experience and possess relevant skills and 
knowledge to perform their duties.

B5

Information and Support

The board should be supplied in a timely manner with 
information in a form and of a quality appropriate to 
enable it to discharge its duties.

The Board is supplied with monthly management 
accounts and detailed operational reviews.

All Directors have access to the advice and services of 
the Company Secretary or suitably qualified alternative, 
and all the Directors are able to take independent 
professional advice, if necessary, at the Company’s 
expense. All Directors are also invited to attend 
meetings of the Executive Committee and have access 
to managers within the Group.

2222

Code of Best Practice – Principles

RM Statement of compliance

B6

Evaluation

The board should undertake a formal and rigorous 
annual evaluation of its own performance and that of its 
committees and individual directors.

The performance of the Board and each Board 
Committee is reviewed on an annual basis and 
a review was conducted during the year ended 
30 November 2014.

The performance of the Chairman is assessed by the 
Non-Executive Directors led by the Senior Independent 
Director. The Senior Independent Director also 
meets with the Non-Executive Directors without the 
Chairman being present on such other occasions as 
considered appropriate.

The performance of the Chief Executive Officer is 
assessed by the Chairman, in consultation with the 
other Non-Executive Directors. The performance of the 
Chief Financial Officer is assessed by the Chief Executive 
Officer, in consultation with the Chairman and other 
Non-Executive Directors.

The Chairman also holds meetings with the Non-
Executive Directors without the Executive Directors 
present when considered appropriate. 

All Directors are appointed for specific terms subject to 
annual re-election.

In preparing the Annual Report to shareholders, the 
Directors consider that they present a summarised 
but fair, balanced and easily understood assessment 
of the Group’s performance and position and provide 
guidance on its future prospects.

The Company operates a risk management and 
internal control process which is reviewed at least on 
an annual basis by the Audit Committee and endorsed 
by the Board.

The Audit Committee is comprised of Non-Executive 
Directors and meets at least three times a year. 
The Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer 
are invited to attend. The Audit Committee meets 
separately with the Company’s auditor without the 
Executive Directors present. Further details are set out in 
the Audit Committee Report.

23

B7

Re-election

All directors should be submitted for re-election 
at regular intervals, subject to continued 
satisfactory performance.

C

ACCOUNTABILITY

C1

Financial and Business reporting

The board should present a fair, balanced and 
understandable assessment of the company’s position 
and prospects.

C2

Risk Management and Internal Control

The board is responsible for determining the nature 
and extent of the significant risks it is willing to take in 
achieving its strategic objectives. The board should 
maintain sound risk management and internal 
control systems.

C3

Audit Committee and Auditors

The board should establish formal and transparent 
arrangements for considering how they should apply 
the corporate reporting and risk management and 
internal control principles and for maintaining an 
appropriate relationship with the company’s auditors.

Code of Best Practice – Principles

RM Statement of compliance

D

REMUNERATION

D1

The Level and Components of Remuneration

Levels of remuneration should be sufficient to attract, 
retain and motivate directors of the quality required 
to run the company successfully, but a company 
should avoid paying more than is necessary for this 
purpose. A significant proportion of executive directors’ 
remuneration should be structured so as to link rewards 
to corporate and individual performance.

Each of the Chief Executive Officer’s and Chief Financial 
Officer’s remuneration consists of basic salary and a 
variable annual bonus. Basic salaries are reviewed 
annually in the light of individual performance and 
market comparisons for similar jobs. Annual bonuses 
may be paid as described in the Remuneration Report.

In addition there are long-term incentive schemes in 
place as detailed in the Remuneration Report. These 
long-term incentive schemes include the Performance 
Share Plan and Share Option Plans.

During the period, neither the Chief Executive Officer 
nor the Chief Financial Officer held any Non-Executive 
positions with other companies.

D2

Procedure

There should be a formal and transparent procedure for 
developing policy on executive remuneration and for 
fixing the remuneration packages of individual directors. 
No director should be involved in deciding his or her 
own remuneration.

Remuneration packages for individual Directors are 
set by the Remuneration Committee after, if required, 
receiving information from independent sources and 
the Company’s Human Resources function. The Chief 
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer may be 
invited to attend the Committee’s meetings.

E

RELATIONS WITH SHAREHOLDERS

E1

Dialogue with Shareholders

There should be a dialogue with shareholders based on 
the mutual understanding of objectives. The board as a 
whole has responsibility for ensuring that a satisfactory 
dialogue with shareholders takes place.

E2

Constructive use of the AGM

The board should use the AGM to communicate with 
investors and to encourage their participation.

The Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer 
offer meetings with major shareholders at least twice 
a year after the announcement of preliminary full year 
and interim results. The Chairman also meets with 
shareholders, as appropriate.

Deena Mattar is Senior Independent Director and 
is available to shareholders if they have concerns 
which contact through the normal channels has 
failed to resolve.

All Non-Executive Directors are available to meet 
institutional shareholders on an ad hoc basis.

All Directors make themselves available at the Annual 
General Meeting to respond to any questions raised by 
the investors in attendance.

2424

Board of Directors
The Board of Directors meets regularly to review 
strategic, operational and financial matters, including 
proposed acquisitions and divestments, and has a 
formal schedule of matters reserved to it for decision. It 
approves the interim and annual Financial Statements, 
the annual financial plan, significant Stock Exchange 
announcements, significant contracts and capital 
investment in addition to reviewing the effectiveness of 
the internal control systems and business risks faced by 
the Group. Where appropriate, it has delegated authority 
to committees of Directors.

Board committees
There are four Board committees: Audit, Remuneration, 
Nomination and Transactions; each of which, apart 
from the Transactions Committee, comprises only Non-
Executive Directors.

The Audit Committee is chaired by Deena Mattar. The 
Audit Committee is comprised solely of independent 
Non-Executive Directors. The Audit Committee meets at 
least three times a year. The Company’s external auditor, 
Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Company 
Secretary, and the Group Financial Controller, who is 
Head of Internal Audit, normally attend these meetings. 
The Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing the 
accounting policies, internal control assessment and 
the financial information contained in the annual and 
interim reports. It provides an opportunity for the Non-
Executive Directors to make independent judgments and 
contributions, thus furthering the effectiveness of RM’s 
internal financial controls. Further details of the Audit 
Committee’s activities are given in the Audit Committee 
Report. The terms of reference for the Audit Committee 
are published on www.rmplc.com.

During the period the Remuneration Committee was 
chaired by Jo Connell (until 19 March 2014) and Patrick 
Martell (from 19 March 2014) and comprised independent 
Non-Executive Directors. Executive Directors and senior 
managers may be invited to attend Committee meetings, 
but will not be present during any discussion of their own 
pay arrangements. The Remuneration Committee sets 
the remuneration of the Executive Directors and senior 
management. It also considers grants and performance 
conditions under RM’s share-based payment schemes 
and reviews RM’s employment strategy generally. Further 
details of the Remuneration Committee’s activities 
are given in the Remuneration Report. The terms of 
reference for the Remuneration Committee are published 
on www.rmplc.com.

The Nomination Committee is chaired by the 
Chairman and includes all of the independent Non-
Executive Directors. The Nomination Committee 
recommends to the Board candidates for appointment 
as Directors. It meets as required, when the Group 
is considering the appointment of Directors. The 
terms of reference for the Nomination Committee are 
published on www.rmplc.com.

The Transactions Committee comprises the Chairman 
plus any one independent Non-Executive Director 
and any one Executive Director. The Transactions 
Committee meets at such times as are required. The 
Transactions Committee approves, enters into and 
authorises the execution of all deeds and documents 
and does everything that is necessary to give effect 
to any ‘substantial transaction’ that has already been 
approved in principle by the Board. The terms of 
reference for the Transactions Committee are published 
on www.rmplc.com.

25

Board attendance
Details of the number of meetings of the Board, including sub-committees and individual attendances by Directors are set out 
in the table below:

Board 
Meetings

Audit 
Committee

Remuneration 
Committee

Nomination 
Committee

12

12

12

11

4

12

11

12

3

3

3

-

1

-

3

3

5

5

5

-

3

-

4

5

1

1

1

-

1

-

-

1

Number of meetings held in the period

John Poulter

Lord Andrew Adonis

David Brooks

Jo Connell1

Iain McIntosh

Patrick Martell2

Deena Mattar

Notes:

1.  Retired 19 March 2014.

2.  Appointed 1 January 2014.

Executive Committee
The Executive Committee is chaired by the Chief Executive Officer. The Executive Committee comprises the Chief Executive 
Officer, Chief Financial Officer and other senior managers within the Group. The Executive Committee normally meets on a 
monthly basis to discuss policy and operational issues. Those issues outside the delegated authority levels set by the Board 
are referred to the Board for its decision. All Non-Executive Directors are invited to attend the Executive Committee.

Relations with shareholders
In order to maintain dialogue with institutional shareholders the Executive Directors offer to meet with them following interim 
and final results announcements, or as appropriate, with other Directors available to meet institutional shareholders on 
request. Where practicable the Annual Report is sent to shareholders at least 20 working days before the Annual General 
Meeting and each issue for consideration at the Annual General Meeting is proposed as a separate resolution. All Directors 
generally attend the Annual General Meeting.

Social, ethical and environmental issues
The Board takes regular account of the significance of social, ethical and environmental (‘SEE’) matters related to the 
Group’s business of providing IT services and solutions (including software, managed services and consultancy) to 
educational institutions.

The Board considers that it has received adequate information to enable it to assess significant risks to the Company’s short 
and long-term value arising from SEE matters and has concluded that the risks associated with SEE matters are minimal. The 
Board will continue to monitor those risks on an ongoing basis and will implement appropriate policies and procedures if 
those risks become significant.

2626

The key features of the systems of internal financial 
control include:

• 

a financial planning process with an annual financial 
plan approved by the Board. The plan is regularly 
updated providing an updated forecast for the year

•  monthly comparison of actual results against plan

•  written procedures detailing operational and 

financial internal control policies which are reviewed 
on a regular basis

• 

• 

• 

regular reporting to the Board on treasury and 
legal matters

defined investment control guidelines 
and procedures

periodic reviews by the Audit Committee of the 
Group’s systems and procedures.

The majority of the Group’s financial and management 
information is processed and stored on computer 
systems. The Group is dependent on systems that 
require sophisticated computer networks. The Group 
has established controls and procedures over the 
security of data held on such systems, including business 
continuity arrangements.

On behalf of the Board, the Audit Committee has 
reviewed the operation and effectiveness of this 
framework of internal control for the period and up to the 
date of approval of the Annual Report.

Internal control
The Group maintains an ongoing process in respect of 
internal control to safeguard shareholders’ investments 
and the Group’s assets and to facilitate the effective and 
efficient operation of the Group.

These processes enable the Group to respond 
appropriately, and in a timely fashion, to significant 
business, operational, financial, compliance and other 
risks, in line with the Codes, which may otherwise prevent 
the achievement of the Group’s objectives.

The Group recognises that it operates in a highly 
competitive market that can be affected by factors and 
events outside its control. Details of the risks faced by 
the Group are set out in the table on pages 11 to 13. 
It is committed to mitigating risks arising wherever 
possible and accepts that internal controls, applied 
and monitored, are an essential tool in achieving 
this objective.

The key elements of Group internal control, which have 
been effective during 2014 and up to the date of approval 
of these Financial Statements, are set out below:

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

the existence of a clear organisational structure with 
defined lines of responsibility and delegation of 
authority from the Board to its Executive Directors 
and operating divisions

a procedure for the regular review of reporting 
business issues and risks by operating divisions

regular review meetings with the 
operating management

a planning and management reporting system 
operated by each division and the Executive Directors

the establishment of prudent operating and 
financial policies.

The Directors have overall responsibility for establishing 
financial and other reporting procedures to provide 
them with a reasonable basis on which to make proper 
judgments as to the financial position and prospects of 
the Group, and have responsibility for establishing the 
Group’s system of internal control and for monitoring 
its effectiveness. The Group’s systems are designed to 
provide Directors with reasonable assurance that physical 
and financial assets are safeguarded, transactions are 
authorised and properly recorded and material errors and 
irregularities are either prevented or detected with the 
minimum delay. However, systems of internal financial 
control can provide only reasonable and not absolute 
assurance against material misstatement or loss.

27

Audit 
Committee 
Report

The Audit Committee operates under terms of reference 
approved by the Board, with the purposes of:

•  monitoring the integrity of the Financial Statements 

of the Company and the Group

• 

• 

reviewing the adequacy and effectiveness of 
the Group’s internal financial controls and risk 
management systems

reviewing the adequacy and security of the Group’s 
arrangements for whistleblowing, the procedures 
for detecting fraud and the systems and controls 
for the prevention of bribery and the reporting 
of non-compliance

•  monitoring and reviewing the effectiveness of 

the Group’s internal audit processes, the remit of 
internal audit and its operations

• 

considering and making recommendations on 
matters relating to the appointment of the Company’s 
external auditor, overseeing the relationship 
with the Company’s external auditor (including 
recommending remuneration levels and considering 
non-audit services), assessing the auditor’s 
independence and objectivity, reviewing the audit 
plan and reviewing the findings of the audit 
with the Company’s auditor.

28

29

Financial Statements
The Audit Committee reviewed the form and content 
of the Annual Report and Financial Statements and 
the interim results prior to their publication to provide 
assurance that the disclosure made in the Financial 
Statements was properly set in context.

The Audit Committee reviewed and considered the 
following areas:

• 

the methods used to account for significant or 
unusual transactions where different approaches 
are possible

•  whether the Group has followed appropriate 
accounting standards and made appropriate 
estimates and judgements, taking into account the 
views of the Company’s auditor

• 

• 

the consistency of, and any changes to, accounting 
policies both on a year-on-year basis and across 
the Group

the clarity of disclosure in the Company’s 
financial reports.

As part of this process the Audit Committee received 
reports from the management and the external auditor. 
The external auditor provided its audit opinion along 
with its audit findings that were of significance in relation 
to the audit of the annual Financial Statements and a 
high-level review of the interim Financial Statements. 
The Audit Committee reviewed these reports with the 
external auditor.

The Audit Committee considers that the significant 
accounting judgements upon which the Financial 
Statements are based relate primarily to long-term 
contract accounting and the related revenue recognition. 
Long-term contracts represent a significant part of 
the Group’s business and the accounting is inherently 
judgemental. To determine the revenue to be recognised 
it is necessary to assess how far a contract has progressed 
and the value of goods and services delivered as a 
proportion of the whole contract. To decide the margin 
to be recognised or loss to be provided, it is necessary to 
estimate future costs. Also, the Group may sign variations, 
extensions and/or new contracts with an existing 
customer and it is necessary to assess whether or not, for 
accounting purposes, these should be combined with an 
existing contract.

Monthly management accounts and reports are provided 
to the Board and Audit Committee. These management 
accounts are based on detailed information obtained by 
management which take into account the following:

• 

• 

• 

the forecast costs to complete on contracts and the 
margin to recognise or loss to be provided 

contract variations and extensions and whether 
they should be combined with existing contractual 
arrangements and their impact on recognised 
revenue and margin

evaluation of contract deliverables and 
whether the delivery criteria have been met for 
revenue recognition.

Where a contract has a significant impact on revenue 
and profit or where there is a significant variation to 
the contract outturn or a significant judgement is 
required, this information is typically included in the 
management accounts and discussed by the Board and 
the Audit Committee.

Taking into account the track record and experience 
of the management team which prepares the costs to 
complete on long-term contracts and after reviewing 
the presentations and reports from management and 
the auditor and consulting with the auditor, the Audit 
Committee was satisfied that, overall, the Financial 
Statements appropriately addressed the critical 
judgements and key estimates (both in respect to the 
amounts reported and the disclosures). 

Management reported to the Committee that they were 
not aware of any material misstatements. The auditor 
reported to the Committee the misstatements that they 
had found in the course of their work and no material 
amounts remain unadjusted. The Audit Committee was 
also satisfied that the significant assumptions used 
for determining the value of assets and liabilities had 
been appropriately scrutinised, challenged and were 
sufficiently robust.

The Audit Committee considered and is satisfied 
that, taken as a whole, the Annual Report and 
Financial Statements 2014 is fair, balanced and 
understandable and provides the information necessary 
for shareholders to assess the Group’s performance, 
business model and strategy. 

3030

Composition and qualifications 
of the Audit Committee
During the period the Audit Committee comprised 
Deena Mattar BSc (Econ), FCA (Chair), John Poulter, 
Lord Andrew Adonis, Jo Connell (until 19 March 2014) 
and Patrick Martell (from 1 January 2014), all of whom 
are independent Non-Executive Directors. The Group 
considers that Deena Mattar as a Fellow of the Institute of 
Chartered Accountants in England and Wales and former 
FTSE250 Finance Director has significant recent and 
relevant financial experience. 

David Brooks (Chief Executive Officer), 
Iain McIntosh MA, FCA (Chief Financial Officer),  
Ed Warwick MEng, FCA (Group Financial Controller) and 
other management as appropriate are invited to attend 
Audit Committee meetings.

Schedule of meetings
The Audit Committee met three times during the period. 
All of these meetings were part of the regular schedule of 
meetings set out in the Committee’s terms of reference.

Audit Committee meetings have formal agendas, which 
cover all of the areas of responsibility set out in the 
Committee’s terms of reference. These agendas include 
meetings with the external auditor without Executive 
Directors or managers of the Company present.

Appointment of external auditor
The Audit Committee recommended, and shareholders 
approved at the Company’s Annual General Meeting on 
19 March 2014, the appointment of KPMG LLP as Group 
external auditor, with KPMG Audit plc not seeking re-
appointment after internal restructuring within KPMG.

KPMG has been the Group’s auditor since 2011. The 
external auditor is required to rotate the audit partner 
responsible for the Group audit every five years and the 
current lead audit partner has been in place since 2011.

There are no contractual obligations restricting the 
Group’s choice of external auditor.

Oversight of external audit
The Audit Committee has reviewed the scope and results 
of the audit services, and the cost effectiveness and 
independence and objectivity of the external auditor.

Internal audit
The Audit Committee has approved the re-appointment 
of RM’s Group Financial Controller, Ed Warwick MEng FCA 
as Head of Internal Audit. For the purposes of this role, the 
Group Financial Controller reports directly to the Chair 
of the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee, with the 
advice and support of the Head of Internal Audit, sets an 
internal audit plan, focussed on financial controls and 
risk areas. The Head of Internal Audit reports on progress 
against this plan at Audit Committee meetings. Internal 
audit activities are undertaken on a peer-to-peer basis.

Policy on non-audit work
The Audit Committee has considered the issue of the 
provision of non-audit work by the external auditor and 
has agreed a policy intended to ensure that the objectivity 
of the external auditor is not compromised. The policy 
sets a limit for fees for non-audit work and states that 
non-audit work should only be undertaken by the external 
auditor where there is a clear commercial benefit in doing 
so. Any significant activity must be approved, in advance, 
by at least two Audit Committee members.

The Audit Committee’s policy is to include a cap on fees 
for non-audit work of 25% of the annual audit fee. This 
fee incorporates a review of the Group’s interim results. 
In exceptional circumstances it may be appropriate 
for the auditor to carry out non-audit work in excess of 
this cap. If this is the case the type of work and the fee 
is considered very carefully by the Audit Committee in 
advance of appointing the auditor to the work. Fees 
for total non-audit work in the period were 2.6% of the 
annual audit fee.

Internal control

Control environment

The Board has put in place an organisational structure 
with clearly defined lines of responsibility and delegation 
of authority to Executive management. A Group-wide 
approval matrix is in place. Individuals are made 
aware of their level of authority and their budgetary 
responsibility which enables them to identify and 
monitor financial performance. There are established 
policies and procedures, which are subject to regular 
review. The Boards of the operating companies work 
within terms of reference and any matters outside those 
terms or the agreed business plan are referred to the 
Board for approval.

31

Anti-bribery
RM conducts all its business in an honest and ethical 
manner and seeks to ensure that all associates and 
business partners do the same.

The Bribery Act 2010 sets clear standards of behaviour, 
which govern the Group’s operations. The Group has 
implemented policies and procedures to ensure that it 
is transparent and ethical in all business dealings. The 
Group has an anti-corruption and anti-bribery policy 
which sets out the legal standards the Group enforces as 
part of its ongoing commitment to implement adequate 
procedures to guard against illegal practices. Staff 
certification of compliance with the policy is regularly 
reported to the Committee.

Statement of risks
As with any business, RM is exposed to risks as an inherent 
part of creating value for shareholders. As described 
above, the Group has put in place processes designed to 
identify these principal risks and to manage and mitigate 
the effect of them. The Audit Committee is responsible for 
ensuring that risks are properly considered and the Board 
is responsible for deciding what risks should be taken and 
how best to manage and mitigate the risks.

The Audit Committee is satisfied that the Group’s 
risk management and internal control processes are 
appropriate to the business and Executive management 
has identified and addressed the principal risks 
affecting RM.

The most significant risks the Group is exposed to are set 
out in the Strategic Report.

Deena Mattar 
Chair, Audit Committee 
2 February 2015

Identification and evaluation of business risks 
and control objectives

The Board has the primary responsibility for identifying 
the principal business risks facing the Group and 
developing appropriate policies to manage those risks. 
It delegates responsibility for operational risks to the 
Executive Committee which meets monthly.

Public reporting 

The Audit Committee reviews and comments upon both 
the Group’s Annual Report and Financial Statements and 
interim results prepared by management.

Management information

Executive managers are required to produce a business 
plan for approval at the beginning of each financial year 
and detailed financial reporting is formally compiled 
monthly and reviewed by the Board. Consolidated 
management accounts are produced each month and 
results measured against plan and the previous year to 
identify significant variances. Forecasts are produced 
each month during the year, with variances to plan 
being measured.

Main control procedures

The existing finance systems and procedures allow the 
Board to derive confidence in the completeness and 
accuracy of the recording of financial transactions. The 
processes in place and the level of analytical detail 
given within the management accounts facilitate the 
identification of unreliable data. The Group’s treasury 
activities are operated within a defined policy designed to 
control the Group’s cash and to minimise its exposure to 
foreign exchange and liquidity risk.

Monitoring

The Audit Committee meets periodically to review 
reports from management and the external auditor 
so as to derive reasonable assurance on behalf of the 
Board that financial control procedures are in place and 
operate effectively. An internal audit plan is set with the 
Audit Committee and updates on progress are provided 
periodically. The internal audit work is performed on 
a peer-to-peer review basis directed by a qualified 
accountant who is independent of the business divisions. 

‘Whistleblowing’ policy
The Group has adopted a formal ‘whistleblowing’ policy, 
which allows staff to raise concerns about possible 
improprieties. No concerns were raised during the year.

3232

Cash and short-term 
deposits at the year end 
were £47.9 million, after 
payment of £14.7 million as a 
special dividend and an extra 
£8 million to the Defined 
Benefit Pension Scheme.

John Poulter 
Chairman

33

 
Remuneration 
Report

Part A - Introduction
On behalf of the Board, I am pleased to present 
the Remuneration Report for the year ended 
30 November 2014.

This Report is divided into the following three sections:

Part A – Introduction 
Part B – Remuneration Policy 
Part C – Implementation Report

The introduction in this Part A provides an overview of 
the Report and explains any major decisions or changes 
in remuneration made during the year and the context of 
those changes (if any). It also summarises the functioning 
and membership of the Remuneration Committee.

The proposed Remuneration Policy set out in 
Part B will be put to a binding vote at the next 

Annual General Meeting and the Implementation Report 
in Part C will be put to an advisory vote.

1. The Remuneration Committee

The Committee operates under terms of reference 
approved by the Board with the purposes of 
determining, on behalf of the Board and shareholders, 
the remuneration of the Executive Directors and senior 
employees throughout the Group. The Committee also 
oversees major policy changes (if any) to the overall 
reward structure of employees throughout the Group. 
In particular, the Committee keeps under review incentive 
plans operated throughout the Group so as to ensure 
that these plans are structured appropriately and are 
coherent. The Committee’s terms of reference can be 
found on the Group’s website at www.rmplc.com.

34

 
 
 
2. Membership of the Committee

The membership of the Remuneration Committee during 
the year ended 30 November 2014 comprised Lord 
Andrew Adonis, Jo Connell (until her retirement at the 
Annual General Meeting on 19 March 2014), Patrick Martell 
(from his appointment on 1 January 2014), Deena Mattar 
and John Poulter, all of whom are independent 
Non-Executive Directors. Jo Connell was Chair of the 
Committee until her retirement, at which point Patrick 
Martell became Chair of the Committee. The other 
Directors attend meetings by invitation.

None of the members of the Remuneration Committee 
has any personal financial interest in the Company 
other than through fees received or as a shareholder. 
They are not involved in the day-to-day running of the 
business and have no personal conflicts of interest 
which could materially interfere with the exercise of their 
independent judgement.

3. Major decisions on Directors’ remuneration

During the year, the following key decisions were 
considered by the Committee:

• 

• 

• 

Agreement of the bonuses payable in respect of the 
financial year ended 30 November 2013.

Approval of the Remuneration Report for the year 
ended 30 November 2013.

The base salary for David Brooks, Chief Executive 
Officer, was increased from £250,000 to £300,000, with 
effect from 1 January 2014. As noted in last year’s 
report, the remuneration of the Chief Executive Officer 
was not increased on his appointment to the role of 
Chief Executive Officer and it was agreed to defer that 
decision until Mr Brooks’ performance in the role after 
a period of time could be considered. The increase 
noted above followed that performance review and 
also a benchmarking exercise.

• 

The grant of PSP awards to Executive Directors and 
senior management in August 2014.

4. Proposed new Shareholding Policy

This year’s Remuneration Report follows a similar 
structure to last year’s report. The key change is the 
proposed introduction of a Shareholding Policy, further 
details of which are set out below.

Part B – Remuneration Policy
1. General objectives

The Remuneration Committee is responsible for the 
remuneration of the Directors and senior employees 
across the Group.

RM’s Remuneration Policy is designed to attract, retain 
and motivate Executive Directors and senior employees, 
both to achieve the Group’s business objectives and 
to deliver outstanding shareholder returns. To achieve 
this, RM’s Remuneration Policy aims to provide ‘median’ 
reward compared to comparator groups when acceptable 
levels of performance have been delivered. For the 
achievement of outstanding performance, it aims to 
deliver ‘upper quartile’ remuneration compared to 
comparator groups.

Under these arrangements, the variable component of 
the remuneration package is designed to be focussed 
on performance. These incentive arrangements enable 
Executive Directors and senior employees to have the 
opportunity to earn high levels of reward but only if they 
enhance shareholder returns by meeting the Group’s 
short-term and long-term targets. The Remuneration 
Policy therefore seeks to ensure that Executive Directors 
and senior employees are focussed on the achievement 
of key company objectives. The Committee is satisfied 
that this model provides appropriate alignment 
with shareholder interests and therefore acts as an 
appropriate motivator.

The Committee, together with the entire Board, also 
recognises the need for investment in the long-term 
future of the Company, not just performance in a single 
year. Since such measures are difficult to quantify, the 
Committee retains the discretion to adjust annual bonus 
payments to ensure that balance is maintained between 
short-term performance and longer-term investment.

The Committee has reviewed the level of risk inherent 
in the Remuneration Policy and is satisfied that there 
is an appropriate balance between encouraging 
entrepreneurial behaviour from Executive Directors and 
senior employees, whilst at the same time ensuring 
that there are no areas of the Policy which encourage 
undue risk taking. In relation to the target setting process 
and other matters arising in relation to the operation 
of the annual bonus and long-term incentive plans, 
the Committee considers that the structure should not 
encourage excessive risk taking.

35

2. Components of remuneration for Executive Directors

The following table sets out a summary of the various components of remuneration for Executive Directors, their purpose and 
link to strategy, how it operates, the maximum opportunity available, the nature of any applicable performance metrics and 
changes (if any) made during the year:

Base salaries will be determined 

None.

from the outcome of reviews.

No change to policy.

Up to 7% of base salary depending 

None.

upon level of employee contribution.

No change to policy.

Private healthcare. 

None.

No change to policy.

Permanent health insurance. 

Life assurance. Car allowance. 

Mobile phone allowance.

55% of base salary for on-target 

Set by the Committee at the beginning 

No change to policy.

performance, with a maximum figure 

of each year to focus on alignment with 

for over-performance of 110% of 

shareholders’ interests.

base salary.

Purpose and link to strategy

Operation

Maximum Opportunity

Performance Metrics

Changes for 2013/14

Element

Fixed Pay

Base Salary

To attract and retain talent 
by ensuring that salaries are 
competitive in the market.

Pension 
(see also 
note 1 below)

To attract and retain talent by 
ensuring that remuneration is 
competitive in the market.

Reviewed annually, with changes usually taking effect from 1 
January. Reviews take account of:

• 

business performance and the wider economic and market 
conditions;

•  market position relative to relevant comparator groups;

• 

• 

the range of salary increases (if any) across the group; and

individual experience and performance.

Reviews may be conducted at other times if appropriate (e.g. on 
a change in responsibility).

Entitlement is the same as for other employees within the Group. 
Cash allowance alternative where individuals are subject to 
HMRC pension limits (subject to there being the same overall 
cost to the Group).

Benefits

Variable Pay

Annual Bonus

LTIPs

Notes:

To attract and retain talent by 
ensuring that remuneration is 
competitive in the market.

Entitlement is the same as for other employees within the 
Group. The range of benefits offered to employees is reviewed 
periodically to ensure that offerings are in line with market 
practice.

Provides an element of at risk 
pay, which incentivises good 
annual financial results.

Reviewed annually prior to the start of each financial year to 
ensure targets support short-term and long-term business 
strategy. Targets are intended to:

• 

• 

• 

• 

be stretching but realistic;

reflect expectations of the investor community;

avoid unnecessary risk-taking; and

encourage long-term decision-making 
(e.g. incentivising long-term investments).

Incentivises Directors 
to achieve returns for 
shareholders over a longer 
time frame.

Awards are granted to Executives and senior management 
typically no more than once per year, with the vesting of awards 
being based on criteria designed to align with shareholder 
interests and encourage long-term performance.

150% of base salary.

Set by the Committee at the date of grant 

See proposed new 

to align with shareholders’ interests over a 

Shareholding Policy below. 

period of not less than 3 years.

No other change to policy.

1.  Group company RM Education Ltd operates a defined benefit pension scheme. This closed to new members in 2003 and, 

in respect of current members, closed to future accruals on 31 October 2012. David Brooks, CEO, has past benefits accrued 
as at 31 October 2012. His entitlements under that Scheme are calculated on the same basis as those of other members. 
Since 1 November 2012, Mr Brooks has been a member of a defined contribution pension scheme.

3636

Element

Fixed Pay

Purpose and link to strategy

Operation

Maximum Opportunity

Performance Metrics

Changes for 2013/14

Base Salary

To attract and retain talent 

Reviewed annually, with changes usually taking effect from 1 

by ensuring that salaries are 

January. Reviews take account of:

competitive in the market.

• 

business performance and the wider economic and market 

Base salaries will be determined 
from the outcome of reviews.

None.

No change to policy.

conditions;

•  market position relative to relevant comparator groups;

the range of salary increases (if any) across the group; and

individual experience and performance.

Reviews may be conducted at other times if appropriate (e.g. on 

a change in responsibility).

Pension 

(see also 

To attract and retain talent by 

Entitlement is the same as for other employees within the Group. 

ensuring that remuneration is 

Cash allowance alternative where individuals are subject to 

note 1 below)

competitive in the market.

HMRC pension limits (subject to there being the same overall 

Benefits

To attract and retain talent by 

Entitlement is the same as for other employees within the 

ensuring that remuneration is 

Group. The range of benefits offered to employees is reviewed 

competitive in the market.

periodically to ensure that offerings are in line with market 

cost to the Group).

practice.

Variable Pay

Annual Bonus

Provides an element of at risk 

Reviewed annually prior to the start of each financial year to 

pay, which incentivises good 

ensure targets support short-term and long-term business 

annual financial results.

strategy. Targets are intended to:

be stretching but realistic;

reflect expectations of the investor community;

avoid unnecessary risk-taking; and

encourage long-term decision-making 

(e.g. incentivising long-term investments).

LTIPs

Notes:

Incentivises Directors 

to achieve returns for 

Awards are granted to Executives and senior management 

typically no more than once per year, with the vesting of awards 

shareholders over a longer 

being based on criteria designed to align with shareholder 

time frame.

interests and encourage long-term performance.

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

Up to 7% of base salary depending 
upon level of employee contribution.

None.

No change to policy.

Private healthcare. 
Permanent health insurance. 
Life assurance. Car allowance. 
Mobile phone allowance.

None.

No change to policy.

55% of base salary for on-target 
performance, with a maximum figure 
for over-performance of 110% of 
base salary.

Set by the Committee at the beginning 
of each year to focus on alignment with 
shareholders’ interests.

No change to policy.

150% of base salary.

Set by the Committee at the date of grant 
to align with shareholders’ interests over a 
period of not less than 3 years.

See proposed new 
Shareholding Policy below. 
No other change to policy.

37

3. Shareholding Policy

The Committee has implemented the following Shareholding Policy for all Executive Directors in order to further align their 
interests with those of the Company’s shareholders:

1.  Within five years of being appointed to the Board, Executive Directors are required to build up, and retain, ordinary shares 

in the Company equivalent in value to at least 100% of their base annual salary.

2.  Compliance with the Shareholding Policy will be measured as at 30 November each year, based on base salaries as at that date.

3.  To comply with the Shareholding Policy, the value of Executive Directors’ shareholdings must exceed the relevant amount 

on at least one of the following bases: 
(a) 
(b) 

the prevailing share price as at 30 November each year (applied to the total number of shares held); or 
the aggregate of (i) the price actually paid for shares (in the case of prior purchases) and (ii) the value of shares that 
have vested through earlier share-based awards, based on the share price applicable on the date of vesting of each 
such award.

4.  Provided that Executive Directors hold the appropriate level of shares, they may sell shares (i) to realise their LTIP awards 

or (ii) upon the exercise of share options. If income tax / national insurance becomes payable on the vesting of any awards, 
Executive Directors may still be able to sell shares to satisfy the relevant liability to income tax / national insurance, even 
where the appropriate level of shares is not held. In all cases, any such sale will be subject to the normal Listing Rules and 
Disclosure and Transparency Rules’ requirements for directors’ dealings.

4. Illustration of Remuneration Policy

The graphs below provide estimates of the potential future reward for each of the Executive Directors based on their 
current roles, the Remuneration Policy outlined above and base salaries as at 1 December 2014. However, it is noted that 
the illustrations show maximum LTIP awards at 150% of base salary, whereas the typical value of LTIP awards is lower (e.g. 
as is shown in paragraph 2 of Part C of this Remuneration Report, the value of LTIP awards made during the year ended 30 
November 2014 was 93% of base salary for David Brooks and 92% of base salary for Iain McIntosh).

David Brooks – Chief Executive Officer

Iain McIntosh – Chief Financial Officer

£000

1200

1000

800

600

400

200

0

Minimum

On-target

Maximum

LTIPs

Variable Pay

Fixed

£000

1200

1000

800

600

400

200

0

Minimum

On-target

Maximum

LTIPs

Variable Pay

Fixed

Explanations:

Explanations:

Base

Benefits

Pension

Total

Base

Benefits

Pension

Total

Fixed 
(£000)

On-target

300

11

21

332

On-target is assumed to be an annual 
bonus equal to 55% of maximum and 
an LTIP award of 25% of maximum

Fixed 
(£000)

On-target

235

11

16

262

On-target is assumed to be an annual 
bonus equal to 55% of maximum and 
an LTIP award of 25% of maximum

Maximum • 

Full pay-out of annual variable pay 
i.e., 110% of base salary

Maximum • 

Full pay-out of annual variable pay 
i.e., 110% of base salary

•  Maximum vesting of LTIP awards

•  Maximum vesting of LTIP awards

3838

 
 
5. Comparison of Remuneration Policy

This policy sets out the remuneration structure applicable to Executive Directors of the Group. Salary levels and incentive 
arrangements applicable to other Group employees are determined by reference to local employment conditions for 
comparative roles.

Budgeted salary increases for Group employees are taken into consideration when determining increases for the 
Executive Directors.

Employees are provided with a competitive benefits package including (as appropriate) private healthcare, permanent health 
insurance, life assurance, car allowance, mobile phone allowance and pension.

The closure of RM Education Ltd’s Defined Benefit Pension Scheme in October 2012 applied equally to all employees, 
including Directors.

Consistent with Directors, the majority of employees are eligible to participate in an annual bonus scheme with conditions 
linked to their personal performance, the performance of their operating business and the Group overall.

The Group does not consult with employees in respect of the Remuneration Policy. However, the Committee receives 
regular updates on salary and bonus levels across the Group and is aware of how the remuneration of Directors compares 
to employees.

In addition, when setting remuneration levels for the Executive Directors, the Committee takes account of the levels of 
remuneration received by executive directors of similar companies.

Whilst remuneration consultants have not been engaged during the period, regular benchmarking is undertaken against 
comparable companies using salary reports and surveys of established remuneration consultants.

6. Directors’ service contracts and letters of appointment

The Committee’s policy on Executive Directors’ service contracts is for them to contain a maximum notice period of one 
year. Each service contract expires at the respective normal retirement date of the Executive Director but is subject to earlier 
termination for cause or if notice is given under the contract. The contracts are designed to allow for flexibility to deal with 
each case on its own particular merits in accordance with the law and policy as they have developed at the relevant time. 
In the event that the Company wishes to terminate the employment of an Executive Director, it will take into account the 
Executive Director’s obligations to mitigate losses when deciding on an appropriate level of compensation.

Details of the Directors’ service contracts and/or letters of appointment who served for all or part of the year ended 
30 November 2014 are shown in the table below:

Initial agreement date

Expiry date of 
current agreement

Notice to be given by 
employer and individual

Current Directors

John Poulter

1 May 2013

30 April 2016

Lord Andrew Adonis

1 October 2011

30 September 2017

1 July 2012

22 October 2009

Indefinite

Indefinite

1 June 2011

31 May 2017

1 January 2014

31 December 2016

6 months

3 months

12 months

12 months

3 months

6 months

David Brooks

Iain McIntosh

Deena Mattar

Patrick Martell

Past Directors

Jo Connell

20 December 2007

19 March 2014

6 months

39

Part C – Implementation Report
1. Directors’ Remuneration - Single figure of Remuneration

The tables below set out a single figure of remuneration for each of the Directors in respect of the year ended 
30 November 2014 and, in respect of those Directors, the equivalent figures for the year ended 30 November 2013:

Year ended 30 November 2014

Salary 
and fees 
£000

Taxable 
benefits 
£000

Annual 
bonus 
£000

Retirement 
Benefits 
£000

LTIPs 
£000

Total 
£000

2961

2351

120

36

14

35

42

11

11

-

-

-

-

-

248

155

-

-

-

-

-

778

22

403

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

211

161

-

-

-

-

-

576

417

120

36

14

35

42

37

1,240

Salary 
and fees 
£000

Taxable 
benefits 
£000

Annual 
bonus 
£000

LTIPs 
£000

Retirement 
Benefits 
£000

2501

2351

70

36

40

-

45

676

10

10

-

-

-

-

-

158

148

-

-

-

-

-

20

306

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Total 
£000

436

409

70

36

40

-

45

181

161

-

-

-

-

-

34

1,036

Name

Executive

David Brooks

Iain McIntosh

Non-Executive

John Poulter

Lord Andrew Adonis

Jo Connell 
(retired 19 March 2014)

Patrick Martell 
(appointed 1 January 2014)

Deena Mattar

Total

Year ended 30 November 2013

Name

Executive

David Brooks

Iain McIntosh

Non-Executive

John Poulter

Lord Andrew Adonis

Jo Connell 
(retired 19 March 2014)

Patrick Martell 
(appointed 1 January 2014)

Deena Mattar

Total

Notes:

1.  The section below headed “Retirement Benefits” explains how those benefits have been calculated and presented in the 

above tables. The figures for 2013 have been restated in accordance with those notes.

4040

The following provides details of how the ‘single figure’ has been calculated:

Taxable benefits 

Annual bonus 

LTIPs   

Retirement benefits 

These comprise the benefits noted in Part B above other than retirement related benefits. 
The figure included in the above table in respect of such benefits is calculated based on 
the taxable value of such benefits.

As stated in the Remuneration Policy, on-target performance is paid out at 55% of base salary, 
with over-performance capped at a maximum of 110% of base salary. At the start of the year,  
the Committee decided that David Brooks’ bonus should be based upon Group adjusted  
operating profit for the year. Whilst the specific target is not disclosed for reasons of  
commercial sensitivity, the Committee took analyst forecasts into account when setting  
targets for bonus payments. Adjusted operating profit for the year exceeded the targets set  
and initial analyst forecasts for the year. Taking those targets into account the Committee  
considered that a bonus of 83% of base salary was appropriate for David Brooks.

The Committee set similar targets for Iain McIntosh, as well as a further target based on a  
reduction in the costs of central corporate overheads. All of those targets were achieved 
in full, with Group adjusted operating profit having over-performed as noted above. Based on  
those targets, the Committee considered that a bonus of 66% of base salary was appropriate  
for Iain McIntosh.

None of the awards previously granted under the RM plc Performance Share Plan 2010  
(the “PSP scheme”) were due to vest during the year. It is noted that the award granted  
under the PSP scheme in December 2011 vested on 2 December 2014 and this will be included  
in next year’s report.

An award to Iain McIntosh under the Group’s Deferred Bonus Plan vested in February 2014.  
In respect of this award, £39,487 of Mr McIntosh’s bonus for the financial year ended  
30 September 2010 was deferred into 25,151 shares. The value of these shares on vesting in  
February 2014 was £32,633, indicating a loss of £6,854 over the period. As such, and in  
accordance with section 8(3) of the Large and Medium-sized Companies and Groups  
(Accounts and Reports) (Amendment) Regulations 2013, a figure of zero is included in the  
above table.

David Brooks is a member of a defined contribution pension scheme operated by  
RM Education Ltd, into which the Group makes a contribution of 7% of base salary. A salary  
sacrifice arrangement is operated in relation to this Scheme (for all employees), meaning  
that base salary is reduced by the contribution that would otherwise be made by the  
individual, with that amount then being added to the employer contribution made to  
the Scheme. However, to make the figures in the above tables more meaningful, base salaries  
are stated prior to the reduction in base salary as a result of that salary sacrifice arrangement.

Iain McIntosh was a member of the defined contribution pension scheme noted above for  
part of the year. During the year, he ceased membership of that scheme and instead now  
receives a cash allowance equivalent to 7% of base salary in lieu of such contribution. Again,  
to make the figures in the above tables more meaningful, the cash received in lieu of pension  
contribution is shown as a retirement benefit and not as part of base salary.

David Brooks is also a member of RM Education Ltd’s Defined Benefit Pension Scheme which  
closed to future accrual with effect from 31 October 2012. During the year, the increase in  
Mr Brooks’ accrued pension under that Scheme was nil.

Note: There were no termination or exit payments made during the year.

41

  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2. Directors’ long-term incentive plans

During the year ended 30 November 2014, the following long-term incentive awards were made:

Type of 
share 
award

PSP1

Face value of 
award  
£000

Grant 
date

4 August 
2014

279 (93% of 
base salary) 2

PSP1

4 August 
2014

217 (92% of 
base salary) 2

Percentage 
that would 
vest at 
threshold 
performance

Maximum 
percentage of 
the face value 
where this is 
more than the 
face value

The end of the 
period over 
which the 
performance 
conditions have 
to be fulfilled

25%

25%

n/a

3 August 2017

n/a

3 August 2017

A summary of 
performance 
targets and 
measures

Relative TSR 
performance3

Relative TSR 
performance3

Name

David 
Brooks

Iain 
McIntosh

Notes:

1.  Awards granted under the RM plc Performance Share Plan 2010.

2.  The face value of each award has been calculated by multiplying the maximum number of shares in the award 
(180,000 shares for David Brooks and 140,000 shares for Iain McIntosh) by the share price on the date of grant of 
the award (154.75 pence).

3.  Targets are based on relative TSR compared with a comparator group of the companies in the FTSE Small Cap 
(ex. Investment Trusts) Index. Threshold vesting is at median performance, maximum vesting at upper quartile 
performance, with straight line vesting in between these points.

3. Performance graph

The following graph shows the value, by 30 November 2014, of £100 invested in RM plc on 30 November 2009 compared with 
the value of £100 invested in the FTSE Small Cap (ex. Investment Trusts) Index on the same date. The other points plotted are 
the values at intervening financial year-ends.

Total shareholder return

£200

£150

£100

£50

0

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

RM plc

FTSE Small Cap Index 
(ex. Investment Trusts)

4. Historical Chief Executive Officer Pay

The table below sets out details of:

• 

the total pay for each of the persons who have performed the role of Chief Executive for the current year and the preceding 
four financial years. The ‘single figure’ is calculated using the same methodology as that used for the “Single Figure of 
Remuneration” table in paragraph 1 above

• 

the pay-out of incentive awards as a proportion of the maximum opportunity for the period.

4242

Single Figure (£000)

Annual variable element 
award rates against maximum 
opportunity

Long-term incentive vesting rates 
against maximum opportunity

Notes:

2010

517

56%

20111

426

0%

20122

286

0%

20133

379

58%4

2014

576

75%

40%

0%

0%

0%

0%

1.  Terry Sweeney to 24 October 2011 (single figure: £369,000). Rob Sirs from 25 October 2011 to 30 November 2011 

(single figure: £57,000).

2.  Rob Sirs from 1 December 2011 to 31 January 2012 (single figure: £49,000). Martyn Ratcliffe from 1 February 2012 to 

30 November 2012 (single figure: £237,000).

3.  Martyn Ratcliffe from 1 December 2012 to 28 February 2013 (single figure: £52,000). David Brooks from 1 March 2013 (single 
figure: £327,000). Figures from the single-figure table in paragraph 1 of this Part C have been pro-rated to reflect the period 
during which Mr Ratcliffe and Mr Brooks respectively fulfilled the role of Chief Executive Officer.

4.  Relates to David Brooks only. Martyn Ratcliffe had no annual variable remuneration.

5. Relative importance of spend on pay

The following table sets out, in respect of the year ended 30 November 2014 and the immediately preceding financial year, the 
total remuneration paid to all employees as compared to other significant distributions and payments:

Total remuneration to employees

Total remuneration to Directors

Dividends paid

Corporation tax paid

Defined benefit pension cash contribution

2014 
£m

69.1

1.2

17.7

2.5

11.8

2013 
£m

87.2

1.1

2.8

1.8

4.4

6. Relative changes in pay – Chief Executive Officer and employees

The average increase in pay for permanent employees across the Group between the year ended 30 November 2013 and the 
year ended 30 November 2014 was 4.4% (3.5% in the UK and 18.3% in India). In the year ended 30 November 2014, the base 
salary for the Chief Executive Officer increased by 20%. As noted above, the remuneration of the Chief Executive Officer was 
not increased on his appointment to the role of Chief Executive Officer and it was agreed to defer that decision until Mr Brooks’ 
performance in the role after a period of time could be considered. The increase noted above followed that performance 
review and also a benchmarking exercise.

7. Statement of shareholder voting

Voting at the Annual General Meeting held on 19 March 2014 in respect of the Remuneration Report for the year ended 
30 November 2013 was as follows:

Resolution to approve the remuneration report

Resolution to approve the Directors’ Remuneration Policy

97.85

96.24

2.14

719,768 (0.01%)

3.75

707,414 (0.01%)

% of votes in 
favour

% of votes 
against

Number of 
votes withheld

43

8. Directors’ shareholdings

The beneficial interests of the Directors (including connected persons as defined for the purposes of section 96B(2) of 
the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000) in the ordinary shares of RM plc as at 30 November 2014 were:

30 November 2014

30 November 20131

John Poulter

Lord Andrew Adonis

David Brooks

Iain McIntosh

Patrick Martell

Deena Mattar

Notes:

87,500

-

3,976

131,382

-

17,933

87,500

-

3,976

131,382

-

17,933

1.  Shareholdings as at 30 November 2013 have been adjusted to reflect the share consolidation that took place on 20 March 

2014, to give a more accurate comparison between the two years shown.

2.  Following the vesting of the December 2011 PSP award on 2 December 2014, and the sale of sufficient shares from those 
awards to satisfy the tax and national insurance liabilities arising on vesting, the shareholdings of David Brooks and 
Iain McIntosh increased to 136,240 and 290,099 shares respectively. No other changes to the Directors’ shareholdings 
took place between 1 December 2014 and the date of this Report. In accordance with section 17(b)(iii) of the Large and 
Medium-sized Companies and Groups (Accounts and Reports) (Amendment) Regulations 2013, the above table does not 
include interests reported elsewhere in this Report.

9. Directors’ interests in share plans

As at 30 November 2014, the Executive Directors had the following interests in the Company’s share plans1:

Share Options2

PSP Awards3

David Brooks

Date of 
Grant

6/12/06

28/11/07

No. of 
Options

10,000

20,000

Exercise 
Price

£1.742

£1.973

Iain McIntosh

None.

Date of Grant

No. of shares 
/ options

Performance 
Conditions

1/12/11

6/8/12

10/7/13

4/8/14

250,000

See note 4

250,000

See note 5

125,000

See note 5

180,000

See note 5

Date of Grant

No. of shares 
/ options

Performance 
Conditions

1/12/11

10/7/13

4/8/14

300,000

See note 4

125,000

See note 5

140,000

See note 5

Notes:

1.  To avoid duplication, and in accordance with Section 17(b)(iii) of The Large and Medium-sized Companies and Groups 
(Accounts and Reports) (Amendment) Regulations 2013, the figures in the above table do not include the shares or 
share-based awards referred to in paragraph 1 (Directors’ Remuneration – Single Figure of Remuneration) or in the table in 
paragraph 8 (Directors’ Shareholdings) above.

4444

The Group’s auditor is required to comment on whether 
certain parts of the Group’s Remuneration Report 
have been prepared in accordance with Schedule 8 of 
the Large and Medium-Sized Companies and Group 
(Accounts and Reports) Regulations 2008. Accordingly, 
the following sections of this Part C of this Report have 
been audited by KPMG LLP:

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

The “Single Figure of Remuneration” table in 
paragraph 1.

Total pension entitlements, as described in the 
notes to paragraph 1.

Scheme interests awarded during the year, as set 
out in paragraph 2.

Directors’ shareholdings, as set out in paragraph 8.

Directors’ interests in share plans, as set out in 
paragraph 9.

By Order of the Board

Patrick Martell 
Chair, Remuneration Committee 
2 February 2015

2.  Granted under “The RM plc 2004 Inland Revenue 
Approved Company Share Option Plan and The 
RM plc 2004 Non-Inland Revenue Approved Company 
Share Option Plan”. All Options lapse if not exercised 
within 10 years of the date of grant. The Options 
in the above table have vested and are no longer 
subject to any performance conditions. Other Options 
previously granted but which have lapsed due to the 
performance conditions not having been met are 
not included.

3.  Granted under “The RM plc Performance Share Plan 
2010”. All PSP awards are subject to a minimum 
vesting period of 3 years.

4.  This award vested in full on 2 December 2014. Please 

see note 2 in paragraph 8 above.

5.  Targets are based on relative TSR compared with 
a comparator group of the companies in the FTSE 
Small Cap (ex. Investment Trusts) Index. Threshold 
vesting is at median performance, maximum vesting 
at upper quartile performance, with straight line 
vesting in between these points.

6.  The PSP awards granted in 2011, 2012 and 2013 
were all conditional share awards. The award 
granted in August 2014 was an award of options, 
with an exercise price of £0.00 per option. If these 
options vest, they would be exercisable in the period 
7 August 2017 to 2 August 2024.

10. Details of Directors’ Service Contracts

Relevant information relating to the Service Contracts 
of the Directors is set out in Part B of this Report 
(Remuneration Policy).

11. Remuneration Committee details

Details of the Remuneration Committee and 
its membership are contained in Part A of this 
Report (Introduction).

12. Compliance with Regulations

This Report has been prepared in accordance with 
Schedule 8 of the Large and Medium-Sized Companies 
and Group (Accounts and Reports) Regulations 2008, as 
amended by The Large and Medium-Sized Companies 
and Groups (Accounts and Reports) (Amendment) 
Regulations 2013. The Report also meets the relevant 
requirements of the Listing Rules of the UK Listing 
Authority and illustrates how the principles of the UK 
Corporate Governance Code relating to Directors’ 
remuneration are applied by the Company.

45

Independent Auditor’s Report

to the members of RM plc only

Opinions and conclusions 
arising from our audit
1. Our opinion on the financial statements 
is unmodified

We have audited the financial statements of RM plc 
for the year ended 30 November 2014 set out on 
pages 49 to 95. In our opinion: 

• 

• 

• 

• 

the financial statements give a true and fair view of 
the state of the Group’s and of the parent company’s 
affairs as at 30 November 2014 and of the Group’s 
profit for the year then ended; 

the Group financial statements have been properly 
prepared in accordance with International Financial 
Reporting Standards as adopted by the European 
Union (IFRSs as adopted by the EU); 

the parent company financial statements have 
been properly prepared in accordance with IFRSs as 
adopted by the EU and as applied in accordance with 
the provisions of the Companies Act 2006; and

the financial statements have been prepared in 
accordance with the requirements of the Companies 
Act 2006 and, as regards the Group financial 
statements, Article 4 of the IAS Regulation. 

2. Our assessment of risks of material misstatement

In arriving at our audit opinion above on the financial 
statements the risk of material misstatement that had 
the greatest effect on our audit was as follows.  

Long-term contracts (Revenue £69.6m; 
Receivables £0.2m; Payables £31.3m)

Refer to page 30 (Audit Committee statement), 
page 58 (accounting policy) and page 76 
(financial disclosures).

• 

The risk – Long-term contracts including Building 
Schools for the Future implementation and 
managed service contracts and e-marking software 
and services contracts, represent a significant 
part of the Group’s business and the accounting is 
inherently judgemental. To determine the revenue 
to be recognised it is necessary to assess how far a 
contract has progressed.  To decide the margin to be 

recognised or loss to be provided, it is necessary to 
estimate future costs, including contingent amounts 
in respect of contract risks.  Also, the Group may sign 
variations, extensions and/or new contracts with 
an existing customer and it is necessary to assess 
whether or not, for accounting purposes, these 
should be combined with an existing contract.

•  Our response – Our audit procedures included, 

among others, making an assessment of the Group’s 
ability to forecast costs.  We assessed the knowledge 
and skill of the Group’s project accounting staff by 
attending two project review meetings at which the 
progress of a number of contracts was discussed.  We 
assessed the range and seniority of those present, 
the quality and relevance of documents prepared 
for discussion, the size of the financial variances 
for which explanations were sought and the extent 
of relevant technical and commercial information 
provided.  Separately, we compared actual outturn to 
previous forecast for a number of contracts.

•  We selected for detailed testing a number of long-

term contracts based on the magnitude of revenue 
recognised in the year and risk indicators (such as 
contracts with a significant change in the estimate 
of lifetime revenue, margin or risk provision, loss 
making contracts and contracts with a large work in 
progress balance).  For the contracts we selected, we 
read any variations, extensions and new contracts 
and considered, amongst other matters, whether the 
new agreement provided value to the customer on a 
stand-alone basis (and therefore should be treated 
as a separate contract) or whether, together with an 
existing contract, it was effectively a single project 
with an overall profit margin (and therefore should be 
accounted for as a revision to the existing contract).  
To evaluate whether revenue had been recognised 
appropriately for the selected contracts, we read 
the contract, determined the contract deliverables 
and obtained evidence of whether significant 
contract requirements had been met (for example, 
by inspecting a customer sign off).  We assessed 
the completeness and accuracy of costs included 
in contract estimates, including those for specified 
contract risks, by reading the contract and customer 

46

correspondence and obtaining evidence to support 
selected inputs.

•  Where a contract had been selected for detailed work 
during a prior year’s audit and the contract is now 
in a stable managed service phase, we determined 
whether revenue and margin in the current year was 
in line with our expectation.  We also assessed the 
adequacy of the Group’s disclosure about estimation 
uncertainty regarding long-term contract outcome. 

3. Our application of materiality and an overview of 
the scope of our audit

The materiality for the Group financial statements as a 
whole was set at £1.1 million determined with reference to 
a benchmark of Group profit before taxation, normalised 
to exclude this year’s restructuring charge, the gain 
on sale of operations and the increase in provision for 
dilapidations on leased properties and onerous lease 
contracts as disclosed in the Adjustments column on the 
face of the income statement, of which it represents 7%.  
We consider the adjusted Group profit before taxation to 
be one of the principal considerations for members of 
the Company in assessing the financial performance of 
the Group.

We report to the Audit Committee any corrected or 
uncorrected identified misstatements exceeding £55,000, 
in addition to other identified misstatements that warrant 
reporting on qualitative grounds.

Of the Group’s ten reporting components, we subjected 
four to audits for group reporting purposes and two to 
specified risk-focused audit procedures. The components 
for which we performed specified risk-focused procedures 
were not individually financially significant enough 
to require an audit for group reporting purposes, but 
did present specific individual risks that needed to be 
addressed. These group procedures covered 98% of 
total Group revenue; 99% of the total profits and losses 
that made up Group profit before tax; and 99% of 
total Group assets. 

The Group audit team instructed component auditors 
as to the significant areas to be covered, and the 
information to be reported back. The Group audit team 
approved the component materialities, which ranged 
from £0.75 million to £1 million, having regard to the 
mix of size and risk profile of the Group across the 
components. The work on three of the six components 
was performed by component auditors and the rest by 
the Group audit team.

The Group audit team visited one component location 
in Nottingham, UK , including to assess the audit risk 
and strategy. Telephone meetings were held with the 

component auditors in the UK and India. At these 
meetings, including the site visit, the findings reported to 
the Group audit team were discussed in more detail.

4. Our opinion on other matters prescribed by the 
Companies Act 2006 is unmodified

In our opinion: 

• 

• 

the part of the Directors’ Remuneration Report to be 
audited has been properly prepared in accordance 
with the Companies Act 2006; and 

the information given in the Strategic Report and 
Directors’ Report for the financial year for which the 
financial statements are prepared is consistent with 
the financial statements. 

5. We have nothing to report in respect of the 
matters on which we are required to report 
by exception 

Under ISAs (UK and Ireland) we are required to report to 
you if, based on the knowledge we acquired during our 
audit, we have identified other information in the annual 
report that contains a material inconsistency with either 
that knowledge or the financial statements, a material 
misstatement of fact, or that is otherwise misleading. 

In particular, we are required to report to you if: 

•  we have identified material inconsistencies between 
the knowledge we acquired during our audit and 
the Directors’ statement that they consider that the 
annual report and financial statements taken as 
a whole is fair, balanced and understandable and 
provides the information necessary for shareholders 
to assess the Group’s performance, business model 
and strategy; or

• 

the section of the annual report describing the work 
of the Audit Committee does not appropriately 
address matters communicated by us to the Audit 
Committee.

Under the Companies Act 2006 we are required to report 
to you if, in our opinion: 

• 

• 

• 

adequate accounting records have not been kept 
by the parent company, or returns adequate for our 
audit have not been received from branches not 
visited by us; or 

the parent company financial statements and the 
part of the Directors’ Remuneration Report to be 
audited are not in agreement with the accounting 
records and returns; or 

certain disclosures of Directors’ remuneration 
specified by law are not made; or 

4747

•  we have not received all the information and 

explanations we require for our audit.

Under the Listing Rules we are required to review: 

• 

• 

the Directors’ statement, set out on page 10, in 
relation to going concern; and

the part of the Corporate Governance Statement 
on pages 21 to 24 relating to the Company’s 
compliance with the nine provisions of the 2010 UK 
Corporate Governance Code specified for our review.

We have nothing to report in respect of the 
above responsibilities.

Scope and responsibilities

As explained more fully in the Directors’ Responsibilities 
Statement set out on page 19, the Directors are 
responsible for the preparation of the financial statements 
and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair 
view. A description of the scope of an audit of financial 
statements is provided on the Financial Reporting 
Council’s website at www.frc.org.uk/auditscopeukprivate. 
This report is made solely to the Company’s members 
as a body and is subject to important explanations and 
disclaimers regarding our responsibilities, published on 
our website at www.kpmg.com/uk/auditscopeukco2014a, 
which are incorporated into this report as if set out in full 
and should be read to provide an understanding of the 
purpose of this report, the work we have undertaken and 
the basis of our opinions.

Tudor Aw (Senior Statutory Auditor) 
for and on behalf of KPMG LLP, Statutory Auditor 

Chartered Accountants 
Arlington Business Park, Theale, 
Reading, RG7 4SD

2 February 2015

4848

Consolidated Income Statement

Year ended 30 November 2014

Year ended 30 November 2013

Adjusted 

Adjustments  

Note

£000 

£000 

Total 

£000 

Adjusted 

Adjustments 

£000 

£000 

3 

202,544 

(126,974)

75,570 

(57,044)

- 

- 

- 

- 

202,544 

261,759 

(126,974)

(187,793)

75,570 

73,966 

(57,044)

(56,757)

- 

- 

- 

- 

Total 

£000 

261,759 

(187,793)

73,966 

(56,757)

Revenue

Cost of sales

Gross profit

Operating expenses

Amortisation of acquisition 
related intangible assets

Impairment of goodwill

Gain on sale of operations

Share-based payment charges

Increase in provisions for 
onerous lease contracts

Restructuring costs

Exceptional credit on settlement

Profit from operations

Investment income

Finance costs

Profit before tax

Tax

5 

13 

12 

5 

7 

8 

9 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

(303)

(303)

- 

429 

(932)

- 

429 

(932)

(774)

(774)

(472)

(472)

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

(195)

(195)

(328)

1,387 

(507)

(328)

1,387 

(507)

(2,627)

(2,627)

(5,128)

(5,128)

543 

543 

(57,044)

(2,052)

(59,096)

(56,757)

(6,855)

(63,612)

18,526 

(2,052)

16,474 

17,209 

(6,855)

10,354 

476 

(924)

- 

476 

730 

- 

730 

(269)

(1,193)

(1,490)

(159)

(1,649)

18,078 

(2,321)

15,757 

16,449 

(7,014)

9,435 

(4,359)

201 

(4,158)

(4,910)

1,643 

(3,267)

Profit for the year

13,719 

(2,120)

11,599 

11,539 

(5,371)

6,168 

Earnings per ordinary share 

10 

- basic

- diluted

16.4p

15.4p

(2.5)p

(2.4)p

13.9p

13.0p

12.6p

12.4p

(5.9)p

(5.8)p

6.7p

6.6p

Paid and proposed 
dividends per share

11 

- interim

- final

- special

0.96p

3.04p

-

Adjustments to results have been presented to give a better guide to business performance (see note 1). 

All amounts were derived from continuing operations.

0.84p

2.46p

16.00p

49

 
 
Consolidated Statement of 
Comprehensive Income

Year ended 
30 November 2014 

Year ended 
30 November 2013 

Note

23 

9 

Profit for the year

Items that will not be reclassified 
subsequently to profit or loss

Defined Benefit Pension Scheme remeasurements

Tax on items that will not be reclassified subsequently to 
profit or loss

Items that are or may be reclassified 
subsequently to profit or loss

Fair value gain/(loss) on hedged instruments

Exchange gain/(loss) on translation of overseas operations

Tax on items that are or may be reclassified subsequently 
to profit or loss

9 

Other comprehensive expense

Total comprehensive (expense)/income for the year 
attributable to equity holders

£000

11,599 

(21,892)

4,378 

1,018 

81 

657 

(15,758)

(4,159)

£000

6,168 

1,442 

(799)

(435)

(329)

73 

(48)

6,120 

50

Consolidated Statement of 
Changes in Equity

Share 

Share 

redemption 

Hedging 

Translation 

Retained 

capital 

premium 

Own shares 

reserve 

reserve  

reserve 

earnings 

Note

£000

£000

£000

£000

£000

£000

£000

Total 
£000 

Capital 

At 1 December 2012

1,870 

26,997 

(2,972)

94 

Profit for the year

Other comprehensive 
income/(expense)

Total comprehensive 
income

Transactions with 
owners of the 
Company

Share-based 
payment fair 
value charges

Dividends paid

25 

11 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

(39)

- 

(56)

(662)

25,232 

- 

6,168 

6,168 

(435)

(329)

716 

(48)

(435)

(329)

6,884 

6,120 

- 

- 

- 

- 

507 

507 

(2,834)

(2,834)

At 30 November 2013

1,870 

26,997 

(2,972)

94 

(474)

(385)

3,895 

29,025 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

Profit for the year

Other comprehensive 
income/(expense)

Total comprehensive 
income/(expense)

Transactions with 
owners of the 
Company

Shares issued 

22 

19 

21 

(18)

Share-based 
payment awards 
exercised

Share-based 
payment fair 
value charges

Dividends paid

25 

11 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

40 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

11,599 

11,599 

1,018 

81 

(16,857)

(15,758)

1,018 

81 

(5,258)

(4,159)

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

22 

(40)

- 

932 

932 

(17,706)

(17,706)

At 30 November 2014

1,889 

27,018 

(2,950)

94 

544 

(304)

(18,177)

8,114 

51

Consolidated Balance Sheet

At 30 November 2014 

At 30 November 2013 

Note

12 
13 
13 
14 
18 
9 

16 
18 

19 

20 

21 

20 
21 
23 

22 

24 

Non-current assets

Goodwill
Acquisition related intangible assets
Other intangible assets
Property, plant and equipment
Other receivables
Deferred tax assets

Current assets
Inventories
Trade and other receivables
Tax assets
Cash and short-term deposits

Total assets
Current liabilities

Trade and other payables
Tax liabilities
Provisions

Net current assets
Non-current liabilities

Other payables
Provisions
Defined Benefit Pension Scheme obligation

Total liabilities
Net assets
Equity attributable to shareholders

Share capital
Share premium account
Own shares
Capital redemption reserve
Hedging reserve
Translation reserve
Retained earnings - (deficit)/earnings

Total equity

£000

14,067 
461 
537 
8,040 
1,878 
8,147 
33,130 

10,604 
32,928 
821 
47,893 
92,246 
125,376 

(79,085)
(600)
(3,660)
(83,345)
8,901 

(1,657)
(5,507)
(26,753)
(33,917)
(117,262)
8,114 

1,889 
27,018 
(2,950)
94 
544 
(304)
(18,177)
8,114 

£000

14,067 
764 
1,026 
9,099 
1,911 
4,622 
31,489 

10,549 
35,134 
340 
63,169 
109,192 
140,681 

(78,917)
- 
(7,201)
(86,118)
23,074 

(3,455)
(6,255)
(15,828)
(25,538)
(111,656)
29,025 

1,870 
26,997 
(2,972)
94 
(474)
(385)
3,895 
29,025 

These Financial Statements of RM plc, registered number 01749877, were approved and authorised for issue by the 
Board of Directors on 2 February 2015. 

On behalf of the Board of Directors, 

David Brooks 
Director 

Iain McIntosh 
Director 

52

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Consolidated Cash Flow Statement

Year ended 
30 November 2014 

Year ended 
30 November 2013 

Profit before tax
Investment income
Finance costs
Profit from operations
Adjustments for:

Impairment of goodwill
Amortisation of acquisition related intangible assets
Amortisation of other intangible assets
Depreciation and impairment of property, plant and equipment
Gain on sale of operations
Loss on disposals of other intangible assets
Gain on disposals of property, plant and equipment
(Gain)/loss on foreign exchange derivatives
Share-based payment charge
Increase in provisions
Defined Benefit Pension Scheme administration cost

Operating cash flows before movements in working capital
(Increase)/decrease in inventories
Decrease in receivables
Decrease in payables:

 - decrease in trade and other payables
 - decrease in onerous lease and dilapidations provisions
 - decrease in employee-related restructuring provisions
 - decrease in other provisions
Cash generated from operations
Defined benefit pension Scheme cash contributions
 - deficit catch-up payments and Scheme expenses
 - pension escrow account

Tax paid
Borrowing facilities arrangement and commitment fees
Interest paid
Income on sale of finance lease debt
Net cash inflow from operating activities
Investing activities
Interest received
Repayment of loans by third parties
Proceeds of sale of operations
Proceeds on disposal of property, plant and equipment
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
Purchases of other intangible assets
Increase in short-term deposits

Net cash used in investing activities
Financing activities

Dividends paid
Special dividend paid
(Repayment of)/net proceeds from vehicle finance leases
Proceeds of share capital issue, net of share issue costs

Net cash used in financing activities
Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year

Note

12 
13 
13 
14 

23 

21 
21 
21 

23 

7 

7 

14 
13 
19 

11
11 

19 

£000

15,757 
(476)
1,193 
16,474 

- 
303 
417 
3,415 
(429)
73 
(398)
(83)
932 
1,339 
475 
22,518 
(55)
2,792 

(708)
(836)
(4,348)
(289)
19,074 

(3,821)
(8,000)
(2,527)
(353)
- 
55 
4,428 

403 
33 
- 
661 
(2,597)
(1)
- 
(1,501)

(3,028)
(14,678)
(530)
22 
(18,214)
(15,287)
57,169 
11 
41,893 

£000

9,435 
(730)
1,649 
10,354 

328 
195 
582 
3,919 
(1,387)
736 
(118)
75 
507 
7,777 
391 
23,359 
4,238 
20,383 

(10,779)
(1,331)
(1,155)
(52)
34,663 

(4,384)
- 
(1,790)
(451)
(20)
289 
28,307 

441 
- 
336 
420 
(1,980)
(68)
(6,000)
(6,851)

(2,834)
- 
771 
- 
(2,063)
19,393 
37,823 
(47)
57,169 

53

Company Statement of 
Changes in Equity

Capital 

Share 

Share 

redemption 

Retained 

capital 

premium 

Own shares 

reserve 

earnings 

Note

£000

£000

£000

£000

£000

Total 
£000 

1,870 

26,997 

(2,972)

94 

27,105 

53,094 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

6,117 

6,117 

6,117 

6,117 

507 

507 

(2,834)

(2,834)

1,870 

26,997 

(2,972)

94 

30,895 

56,884 

- 

- 

- 

- 

19 

21 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

(18)

40 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

6,281 

6,281 

6,281 

6,281 

- 

(40)

932 

22 

- 

932 

(17,706)

(17,706)

25 

11 

22 

25 

11 

At 1 December 2012

Profit for the year

Total comprehensive income

Transactions with owners of the Company

Share-based payment fair value charges

Dividends paid

At 30 November 2013

Profit for the year

Total comprehensive income

Transactions with owners of the Company

Shares issued

Share-based payment awards exercised

Share-based payment fair value charges

Dividends paid

At 30 November 2014

1,889 

27,018 

(2,950)

94 

20,362 

46,413 

As permitted by section 408 of the Companies Act 2006, no separate income statement is presented for the parent company, 
RM plc. 

54

 
Company Balance Sheet

At 30 November 2014 

At 30 November 2013 

Non-current assets

Investments

Other receivables

Current assets

Trade and other receivables

Tax assets

Total assets 

Current liabilities

Amounts owed to Group undertakings

Net current (liabilities)/assets

Non-current liabilities

Provisions

Total liabilities

Net assets

Equity attributable to equity holders

Share capital 

Share premium account 

Own shares 

Capital redemption reserve 

Retained earnings

Total equity

Note

£000

15 

18 

18 

20 

21 

22 

24 

64,255 

1,628 

65,883 

14,372 

53 

14,425 

80,308 

(29,002)

(14,577)

(4,893)

(33,895)

46,413 

1,889 

27,018 

(2,950)

94 

20,362 

46,413 

These Financial Statements of RM plc, registered number 01749877, were approved and authorised for issue by the 
Board of Directors on 2 February 2015. 

On behalf of the Board of Directors, 

David Brooks 
Director 

Iain McIntosh 
Director 

£000

55,548 

1,661 

57,209 

104 

- 

104 

57,313 

- 

104 

(429)

(429)

56,884 

1,870 

26,997 

(2,972)

94 

30,895 

56,884 

55

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Company Cash Flow Statement

Year ended 
30 November 2014 

Year ended 
30 November 2013 

Note

21

11

11

Profit before tax

Investment income

Finance costs

Loss from operations

Adjustments for:

Impairment of investment in subsidiary

Profit on disposal of investments

Increase/(decrease) in provisions

Operating cash flows before movements in working capital

Increase in receivables

Increase/(decrease) in payables

Cash generated from/(used in) operations

Dividends received

Net cash generated from operating activities

Investing activities

Increase in investments

Repayment of loans by third parties

Interest received

Net cash (used in)/generated from investing activities

Financing activities

Dividends paid

Special dividend paid

Proceeds from share capital issue, net of share issue costs

Proceeds from disposal of investments

Net cash used in financing activities

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year

£000

6,228 

(8,520)

304 

(1,988)

- 

- 

4,464 

2,476 

(7,825)

22,602 

17,253 

8,000 

25,253 

(7,775)

33 

173 

(7,569)

(3,028)

(14,678)

22 

- 

(17,684)

- 

- 

- 

£000

6,117 

(6,576)

33 

(426)

555 

(77)

(200)

(148)

(10)

(3,686)

(3,844)

6,200 

2,356 

- 

- 

343 

343 

(2,834)

- 

- 

135 

(2,699)

- 

- 

- 

56

Notes to the Financial Statements

1. General information
RM plc (‘Company’) is incorporated in the United Kingdom 
and listed on the London Stock Exchange. It is the parent 
company of a group of companies (‘Group’) whose 
business activities and financial position, together 
with the factors likely to affect its future development, 
performance and position, and risk management 
policies are presented in the Strategic Report and 
the Directors’ Report. 

Consolidated Income Statement presentation

The Income Statement is presented in three columns. This 
presentation is intended to give a better guide to business 
performance by separately identifying the following 
adjustments to profit which are considered exceptional in 
nature or with potential significant variability year on year 
in non-cash items which might mask underlying trading 
performance: the amortisation of acquisition related 
intangible assets; the impairment of goodwill; the gain/
loss on sale of operations; share-based payment charges; 
restructuring costs; changes in the provision for onerous 
lease contracts; and exceptional credit on settlement. The 
columns extend down the Income Statement to allow the 
tax and earnings per share impacts of these transactions 
to be disclosed. Equivalent material adjustments to 
profit arising in future years, including increases in 
or reversals of items recorded, will be disclosed in a 
consistent manner.

2. Significant accounting policies
The accounting policies are drawn up in accordance 
with those International Accounting Standards (IAS) and 
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) issued 
by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) 
and adopted for use in the EU and therefore comply with 
Article 4 of the EU IAS Regulation applied in accordance 
with the provisions of the Companies Act 2006. 

These accounting policies have been consistently applied 
to the years presented unless otherwise specified.

The Financial Statements are prepared on a going 
concern basis. The Directors’ reasons for continuing to 
adopt this basis are set out in the Going Concern section 
of the Strategic Report.

Basis of preparation

The Financial Statements have been prepared on 
the historical cost basis except for certain financial 
instruments, share-based payments and pension 
assets and liabilities which are measured at fair value. 
The preparation of financial statements, in conformity 
with generally accepted accounting principles, requires 
the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the 
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure 
of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the 
financial statements and the reported amounts of 
revenues and expenses during the reporting period. 
Although these estimates are based on the Directors’ best 
knowledge of current events and actions, actual results 
ultimately may differ from those estimates.

Consolidation

The Group Financial Statements incorporate the Financial 
Statements of the Company and all its subsidiaries for the 
periods during which they were members of the Group.

Inter-company balances and transactions between 
Group companies are eliminated on consolidation. 
On acquisition, assets and liabilities of subsidiaries are 
measured at their fair values at the date of acquisition 
with any excess of the cost of acquisition over this value 
being capitalised as goodwill.

Investment in subsidiaries 

In the Company Financial Statements, investments in 
subsidiaries are stated at cost less any provision for 
impairment where appropriate.

Business combinations

The acquisition of subsidiaries is accounted for using 
the acquisition method. The cost of the acquisition is 
measured at the aggregate of the fair values, at the date 
of exchange, of assets given and liabilities incurred or 
assumed in exchange for control. The acquired company’s 
identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities that 
meet the conditions for recognition under IFRS 3 Business 
Combinations are recognised at their fair value at the 
acquisition date.

57

Revenue

Revenue represents amounts receivable for goods 
supplied and services provided to third parties net of VAT 
and other sales-related taxes. 

Revenue from the sale of goods and services is recognised 
upon transfer to the customer of the significant risks and 
rewards of ownership. This is generally when goods are 
despatched to, or services performed for, customers. 
Revenue on hardware and perpetual software licences is 
recognised on shipment providing there are no unfulfilled 
obligations that are essential to the functionality of 
the delivered product and with consideration of any 
significant credit risk uncertainty. If such obligations exist, 
revenue is recognised as they are fulfilled. Revenue from 
term licences is spread over the period of the licence, 
reflecting the Group’s obligation to support the relevant 
software products or update their content over the term 
of the licence. Revenue from contracts for maintenance, 
support and annually and other periodically contracted 
products and services is recognised on a pro-rata basis 
over the contract period. Revenue from installation, 
consultancy and other services is recognised when 
the service has been provided. For multiple element 
arrangements revenue is allocated to each element on a 
fair value basis. The portion of the revenue allocated to 
an element is recognised when the revenue recognition 
criteria for that element have been met. Appropriate 
provisions for returns, trade discounts and other 
allowances are deducted from revenue. Where customer 
payments are received in advance of the recognition 
of revenue, the amount is included within deferred 
income and is aged dependent upon the estimated 
recognition profile.

Long-term contracts

Revenue on long-term contracts is recognised while 
contracts are in progress. Revenue is recognised 
proportionally to the stage of completion of the contract, 
based on the fair value of goods and services provided to 
date, taking into account the sign-off of milestone delivery 
by customers.

Long-term contracts represent those accounted for in 
accordance with the principles of IAS 18 Revenue and 
related linkage with IAS 11 Construction Contracts. 

Profit on long-term contracts is recognised when the 
outcome of the contract can be assessed with reasonable 
certainty, including assessment of contingent and 
uncertain future expenses. Thereafter profit is recognised 
based upon the expected outcome of the contract and 
the revenue recognised at the balance sheet date as a 
proportion of total contract revenue.

If the outcome of a long-term contract cannot be 
assessed with reasonable certainty, no profit is 
recognised. Any expected loss on a contract as a whole, is 

5858

recognised as soon as it is foreseen. The loss is calculated 
using a discounted cash flow model utilising a discount 
rate that reflects an estimate of the market’s assessment 
of the time value of money and the risks specific to the 
liability. Any unwinding of the discount is included in the 
Income Statement in finance costs.

Where the cumulative fair value of goods and services 
provided exceeds amounts invoiced the balance is 
included within trade and other receivables as long-term 
contract balances. Where amounts invoiced exceed the 
fair value of goods and services provided the excess is 
first set off against long-term contract balances and then 
included in amounts due to long-term contract customers 
within trade and other payables.

Pre-contract costs are expensed until the awarding of 
the contract to the Group is considered to be virtually 
certain which is not before the Group has been appointed 
sole preferred bidder. Once virtual certainty has been 
established and the contract is expected to be awarded 
within a reasonable timescale and pre-contract costs are 
expected to be recovered from the contract’s net cash 
flows, then pre-contract costs are recognised as an asset 
and accounted for as long-term contract costs.

Intangible assets

All intangible assets, except goodwill, are stated at cost 
less accumulated amortisation and any accumulated 
impairment losses. 

Goodwill

Goodwill represents the amount by which the fair value 
of the cost of a business combination exceeds the fair 
value of net assets acquired. Goodwill is not amortised 
and is stated at cost less any accumulated impairment 
losses. For business combinations occurring before 1 
October 2004, the Group’s transition date to IFRS, the cost 
of goodwill is deemed to be the UK GAAP net book value 
at this date. 

The recoverable amount of goodwill is tested for 
impairment annually or when events or changes 
in circumstance indicate that it might be impaired. 
Impairment charges are deducted from the carrying 
value and recognised immediately in profit or loss. For 
the purpose of impairment testing, goodwill is allocated 
to each of the Group’s cash generating units expected 
to benefit from the synergies of the combination. If the 
recoverable amount of the cash generating unit is less 
than the carrying amount of the unit, the impairment loss 
is allocated first to reduce the carrying amount of any 
goodwill allocated to the unit and then to the other assets 
of the unit pro-rata on the basis of the carrying amount of 
each asset in the unit. An impairment loss recognised for 
goodwill is not reversed in a subsequent period.

Research and development costs

Property, plant and equipment

Research and development costs associated with the 
development of software products or enhancements and 
their related intellectual property rights are expensed 
as incurred until all of the following criteria can be 
demonstrated, in which case they are capitalised as an 
intangible asset:

a. 

the technical feasibility of completing the intangible 
asset so that it will be available for use or sale; and

b.  an intention to complete the intangible asset and use 

or sell it; and

c.  ability to use or sell the intangible asset; and

d.  how the intangible asset will generate probable future 
economic benefits. Among other things, the Group 
can demonstrate the existence of a market for the 
output of the intangible asset or the intangible asset 
itself or, if it is to be used internally, the usefulness of 
the intangible asset; and

e. 

f. 

the availability of adequate technical, financial and 
other resources to complete the development and to 
use or sell the intangible asset; and

an ability to measure reliably the expenditure 
attributable to the intangible asset during 
its development.

The technological feasibility for the Group’s software 
products is assessed on an individual basis and is 
generally reached shortly before the products or 
services are released, and late in the development cycle. 
Capitalised development costs are amortised on a 
straight-line basis over their useful lives, once the product 
is available for use. Useful lives are assessed on a project-
by-project basis. 

Other intangible assets

Intangible assets purchased separately, such as software 
licences that do not form an integral part of hardware and 
the costs of internally generated software for the Group’s 
use, are capitalised at cost and amortised over their 
useful lives of 2-8 years.

For business combinations occurring after 1 October 
2004, net assets acquired includes an assessment of the 
fair value of separately identifiable acquisition related 
intangible assets, in addition to other assets, liabilities 
and contingent liabilities purchased. These are amortised 
over their useful lives which are individually assessed.

Property, plant and equipment assets are stated at cost, 
less accumulated depreciation and any accumulated 
impairment losses where appropriate.

Property, plant and equipment are depreciated by equal 
annual instalments to write down the assets to their 
estimated disposal value at the end of their useful lives 
as follows: 

Freehold property   

Up to 50 years

Leasehold building improvements 

Up to 25 years

Plant and equipment 

Computer equipment 

Vehicles 

3 - 10 years

2 - 5 years

2 - 4 years

Impairment of tangible and intangible assets 
excluding goodwill

At each balance sheet date, the Group reviews the 
carrying amounts of its tangible and intangible assets 
to determine whether there is any indication that those 
assets have suffered an impairment loss. If any such 
indication exists, the recoverable amount of the asset 
is estimated in order to determine the extent of any 
impairment loss. Where the asset does not generate cash 
flows that are independent from other assets, the Group 
estimates the recoverable amount of the cash generating 
unit to which the asset belongs. 

The recoverable amount is the higher of fair value less 
costs to sell and value in use. In assessing value in use, 
the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their 
present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects 
current market assessments of the time value of money 
and the risks specific to the asset for which the estimates 
of future cash flows have not been adjusted. 

If the recoverable amount of an asset (or cash generating 
unit) is estimated to be less than its carrying amount, the 
carrying amount of the asset (or cash generating unit) is 
reduced to its recoverable amount. An impairment loss is 
recognised as an expense immediately.

Where an impairment loss subsequently reverses, the 
carrying amount of the asset (or cash generating unit) 
is increased to the revised estimate of its recoverable 
amount, but so that the increased carrying amount does 
not exceed the carrying amount that would have been 
determined had no impairment loss been recognised 
for the asset (or cash generating unit) in prior periods. 
A reversal of an impairment loss is recognised as 
income immediately.

59

 
 
 
 
 
Financial instruments

Trade receivables

Trade receivables are not interest bearing and are stated 
at their original invoiced value reduced by appropriate 
allowances for estimated irrecoverable amounts.

Cash and short-term deposits

Cash comprises cash at bank and in hand and deposits 
with a maturity of three months or less. Bank overdrafts 
are included in cash only to the extent that the Group 
has the right of set-off. Short-term deposits represent 
cash deposited with a maturity period in excess of three 
months and where the deposited amounts cannot be 
recalled on demand.

Trade and other payables

Trade payables on normal terms are not interest bearing 
and are stated at original invoiced amount.

Derivative financial instruments

The Group holds derivative financial instruments to hedge 
its foreign currency exposure. 

On initial designation of the derivative as the hedging 
instrument, the Group formally documents the 
relationship between the hedging instrument and hedged 
item, including the risk management objectives and 
strategy in undertaking the hedge transaction and the 
hedged risk, together with the methods that will be used 
to assess the effectiveness of the hedging relationship. 
The Group makes an assessment, both at the inception 
of the hedge relationship as well as on an ongoing basis, 
as to whether the hedging instruments are expected to be 
“highly effective” in offsetting the changes in the fair value 
or cash flows of the respective hedged items attributable 
to the hedged risk, and whether the actual results of 
each hedge are within a range of 80 – 125 percent. For a 
cash flow hedge of a forecast transaction, the transaction 
should be highly probable to occur and should present an 
exposure to variations in cash flows that could ultimately 
affect reported profit or loss.

Derivatives are recognised initially at fair value and 
attributable transaction costs are recognised in profit 
or loss as incurred. Subsequent to initial recognition, 
derivatives are measured at fair value, and changes 
therein are accounted for as described below. Fair value 
measurements are classified using a fair value hierarchy 
that reflects the significance of the accuracy of inputs 
used in making the measurements.

Cash flow hedges

When a derivative is designated as the hedging 
instrument in a hedge of the variability in cash flows 
attributable to a particular risk associated with a 
recognised asset or liability or a highly probable forecast 
transaction that could affect profit or loss, the effective 
portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative 
is recognised in Other Comprehensive Income and 
presented in the hedging reserve in equity. Any ineffective 
portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative is 
recognised immediately in profit or loss.

When the hedged item is a non-financial asset, the 
amount accumulated in equity is included in the carrying 
amount of the asset when the asset is recognised. In other 
cases the amount accumulated in equity is reclassified 
to profit or loss in the same period that the hedged item 
affects profit or loss. If the hedging instrument no longer 
meets the criteria for hedge accounting, expires or is sold, 
terminated or exercised, or the designation is revoked, 
then hedge accounting is discontinued prospectively. If 
the forecast transaction is no longer expected to occur, 
then the balance in equity is reclassified in profit or loss.

Other non-trading derivatives

When a derivative financial instrument is not designated 
in a hedge relationship that qualifies for hedge 
accounting, all changes in its fair value are recognised 
immediately in profit or loss.

Inventories

Finished goods and work-in-progress are valued at cost 
on a first in first out basis, including appropriate labour 
costs and other overheads. Raw materials and bought 
in finished goods are valued at purchase price. Stocks 
are recognised when the Group has the rights and 
obligations of ownership, which in the case of supply 
from the Far East may be from the point of production 
or the point of shipment. All inventories are reduced to 
net realisable value where lower than cost. Provision 
is made for obsolete, slow moving and defective items 
where appropriate.

Provisions

A provision is recognised if, as a result of a past event, 
the Group has a present legal or constructive obligation 
that can be estimated reliably, and it is probable that an 
outflow of economic benefits will be required to settle the 
obligation. Provisions are determined by discounting the 
expected future cash flows at a pre-tax rate that reflects 
current market assessments of the time value of money 
and the risks specific to the liability. The unwinding of the 
discount is recognised as a finance cost.

6060

Restructuring

A provision for restructuring is recognised when the Group 
has approved a detailed and formal restructuring plan, 
and the restructuring either has commenced or has been 
announced publicly. Future operating losses are not 
provided for.

Onerous contracts

A provision for onerous contracts is recognised when 
the expected benefits to be derived by the Group 
from a contract are lower than the unavoidable cost 
of meeting its obligations under the contract. The 
provision is measured at the present value of the lower 
of the expected cost of terminating the contract and 
the expected net cost of continuing with the contract. 
Before a provision is established, the Group recognises 
any impairment loss on the assets associated with 
that contract.

Dilapidations provision

A dilapidations provision is recognised when the Group 
has an obligation to rectify, repair or reinstate a leased 
premises to a certain condition in accordance with 
the lease agreement. The provision is measured at 
the present value of the estimated cost of rectifying, 
repairing or reinstating the leased premises at a specified 
future date. To the extent that future economic benefits 
associated with leasehold improvements are expected 
to flow to the Group, this cost is capitalised within the 
leasehold improvement category of property, plant 
and equipment and is depreciated over its useful 
economic life.

Leases

Where assets are financed by leasing agreements which 
give rights approximating to ownership, the assets are 
treated as if they had been purchased outright. The 
amount capitalised is the lower of the fair value or the 
present value of the minimum lease payments during the 
lease term determined at the inception of the lease. The 
assets are depreciated over the shorter of the lease term 
or their useful life. Obligations relating to finance leases, 
net of finance charges in respect of future periods, are 
included, as appropriate, under other payables due within 
or after one year. The finance charge element of rentals 
is charged to finance costs in the Income Statement over 
the lease term.

All other leases are classified as operating leases, the 
rentals of which are charged to the Income Statement on 
a straight line basis over the lease term.

Share-based payments

The Group operates a number of executive and employee 
share schemes. For all grants of share-based payments, 
the fair value as at the date of grant is calculated using 

a pricing model and the corresponding expense is 
recognised over the vesting period. Where the vesting 
period is shortened after the date of grant, the remaining 
expense, is recognised over the shortened vesting period. 
Over the vesting period and at vesting the cumulative 
expense is adjusted to take into account the number 
of awards expected to or actually vesting as a result of 
survivorship and where this reflects non-market-based 
performance conditions. Share-based payment charges 
which are incurred by a subsidiary undertaking are 
included as an increase in Investments in subsidiary 
undertakings within the parent company, and a capital 
contribution in the subsidiary.

Employee benefits

The Group has both defined benefit and defined 
contribution pension schemes. For the Defined Benefit 
Pension Scheme, based on the advice of a qualified 
independent actuary at each balance sheet date and 
using the projected unit method, the administrative 
expenses are charged to operating profit, with the 
interest cost, net of interest on scheme assets, reported 
as a financing item. Defined benefit pension scheme 
remeasurements are recognised directly in equity such 
that the balance sheet reflects the Scheme’s surplus or 
deficit as at the balance sheet date. 

Contributions to defined contribution plans are charged 
to operating profit as they become payable. 

Employee Share Trust

The Employee Share Trust, which holds ordinary shares 
of the Company in connection with certain share 
schemes, is consolidated into the Financial Statements. 
Any consideration paid to the Trust for the purchase of 
the Company’s own shares is shown as a movement in 
shareholders’ equity.

Taxation

Current tax, including UK corporation tax and foreign tax, 
is provided at amounts expected to be paid or recovered 
using the tax rates and laws that have been enacted or 
substantively enacted by the balance sheet date.

Deferred taxation is accounted for using the balance 
sheet liability method in respect of temporary differences 
arising from differences between the carrying amount of 
assets and liabilities in the Financial Statements and the 
corresponding tax bases used in computation of taxable 
profit. Deferred tax liabilities are recognised for all taxable 
temporary differences except in respect of investments 
in subsidiaries where the Group is able to control the 
reversal of the temporary difference and it is probable 
that the temporary difference will not reverse in the 
foreseeable future. 

61

Current tax balances are offset when there is a legally 
enforceable right to set off current tax assets against 
current tax liabilities.

Strategic Report and give rise to the following estimations 
and judgements which are disclosed within the relevant 
note to the Annual Report and Financial Statements:

• 

• 

Long-term contract outcome – see note 17

Defined Benefit Pension Scheme valuation – see note 23

•  Onerous lease provision – see note 21

• 

Goodwill valuation and impairment – see note 12

Adoption of new and revised International Financial 
Reporting Standards 

The IFRIC interpretations, amendments to existing 
standards and new standards that are mandatory and 
relevant for the Company’s accounting periods beginning 
on or after 1 December 2013 have been adopted. The 
following new standards and interpretations have been 
adopted in the current period but have not impacted the 
reported results or the financial position: 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

IFRS 1 First time Adoption of IFRS, amendments to 
repeat application, borrowing costs 

IFRS 2 Share-based Payment amendment for grant 
dates after 30 June 2014

IFRS 3 Business Combinations amendment for 
acquisitions after 30 June 2014

IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures, 
amendments relating to offsetting of assets and 
liabilities

IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements

IFRS 11 Joint Arrangements

IFRS 12 Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities

IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement

IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements 
amendment relating to comparative information

IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment amendment 
relating to servicing equipment

IAS 27 Separate Financial Statements (2011)

IAS 28 Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures 
issued 2011

IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Presentation 
amendments relating to offsetting of assets and 
liabilities, and tax effect of equity distributions

IAS 33 Interim Reporting amendment relating to 
interim reporting of segment assets

Deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that it 
is probable that future taxable profit will be available 
against which the temporary difference can be utilised. 
Their carrying amount is reviewed at each balance sheet 
date on the same basis. 

Deferred tax is measured on an undiscounted basis, and 
at the tax rates that are expected to apply in the periods 
in which the asset or liability is settled. It is recognised 
in the Income Statement except when it relates to items 
credited or charged directly to equity, in which case the 
deferred tax is also presented in equity. Deferred tax 
assets and liabilities are offset when they relate to income 
taxes levied by the same taxation authority and when the 
Group intends to settle its current tax assets and liabilities 
on a net basis.

Foreign currencies

The Group presents its Financial Statements in Sterling 
because this is the currency in its primary operating 
environment. Balance sheet items of subsidiary 
undertakings whose functional currency is not Sterling 
are translated into Sterling at the period-end rates 
of exchange. Income Statement items and the cash 
flows of subsidiary undertakings are translated at the 
average rates for the period. Exchange differences on the 
translation of subsidiary opening net assets at closing 
rates of exchange and the differences arising between 
the translation of profits at average and closing exchange 
rates are recorded as movements in the currency 
translation reserve.

Transactions denominated in foreign currencies are 
translated into Sterling at rates prevailing at the dates of 
the individual transactions. Foreign currency monetary 
assets and liabilities are translated at the rates prevailing 
at the balance sheet date. Exchange gains and losses 
arising are charged or credited to the Income Statement 
within operating costs. Foreign currency non-monetary 
amounts are translated at rates prevailing at the time of 
establishing the fair value of the asset or liability.

Dividends

Dividends are recognised as a liability in the period in 
which the shareholders’ right to receive payment has 
been established.

Key sources of estimation uncertainty and critical 
accounting judgements

In applying the Group’s accounting policies the 
Directors are required to make judgements, estimates 
and assumptions. Actual results may differ from these 
estimates. The Group’s key risks are set out in the 

6262

New standards and interpretations not yet adopted

At the date of authorisation of these Financial Statements, 
the following Standards and Interpretations which have 
not been applied in these Financial Statements were in 
issue but not yet effective/endorsed (and in some cases 
had not yet been adopted by the EU):

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

IFRS 2 Share-based Payment amendments

IFRS 3 Business Combinations amendments

IFRS 5 Non-current Assets Held for Sale and 
Discontinued Operations amendments

IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosure amendments 
in connection with IFRS 9

IFRS 8 Operating Segments amendments

IFRS 9 Financial Instruments as amended 2014

IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements 
amendments

IFRS 11 Joint Arrangements amendments

IFRS 12 Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities 
amendments

IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement

IFRS 14 Regulatory Deferral Accounts

IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers

3. Revenue

Revenue from supply of products

Revenue from rendering of services

Revenue from the sale of licences and receipt of royalties

Total revenue 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment amendments

IAS 19 Employee Benefits amendments

IAS 24 Related Party Disclosure amendments

IAS 27 Separate Financial Statements amendments

IAS 28 Investments in Associates amendments

IAS 34 Interim Financial Reporting amendments

IAS 36 Impairment of Assets amendments

IAS 38 Intangible Assets amendments

IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and 
Measurement amendments

IAS 40 Investment Properties amendments

IAS 41 Agriculture amendments

IFRIC 21 Levies 

The Directors are finalising their analysis and do not 
expect that the adoption of the standards listed above 
will have a material impact on the Financial Statements 
of the Company and Group in future periods, except 
potentially for IFRS 7 and IFRS 9 (measurement and 
disclosure of financial instruments), and IFRS 15 (revenue 
and deferred income). IFRS 15 will first apply for the year 
ended 30 November 2018, and an exercise to investigate 
the impact on the Group is planned during the coming 
financial year.

Year ended 
30 November 2014 

Year ended 
30 November 2013 

£000

93,998 

92,807 

15,739 

202,544 

£000

136,307 

107,494 

17,958 

261,759 

63

4. Operating segments
The Group’s business is supplying products, services and solutions to the UK and international education markets.

The Group is structured into three operating divisions: RM Resources (previously known as Education Resources), RM Results 
(previously Assessment and Data Services) and RM Education (previously Education Technology). 

A full description of each division, together with comments on its performance and outlook, is given in the Strategic report.

This Segmental analysis shows the result and assets of these divisions. Revenue is that earned by the Group from third parties.

Segmental results

Year ended 30 November 2014

£000

£000

£000

£000

RM Resources 

RM Results  

RM Education 

Corporate 
Services 

53,903 

27,136 

110,712 

4,052 

994 

2,980 

875 

62,804 

10,330 

37 

- 

119 

535 

315 

206 

- 

680 

27,827 

111,913 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

4,648 

7,700 

(4,152)

18,526 

Revenue

UK

Europe

North America

Asia

Rest of the world

Adjusted profit from operations

Investment income

Adjusted finance costs

Adjusted profit before tax

Adjustments (see note 1)

Profit before tax

Corporate 
Services 

£000

- 

35 

- 

- 

- 

180,661 

352 

22 

26 

110 

181,171 

9,406 

35 

(3,629)

Year ended 30 November 2013

£000

£000

£000

RM Resources 

RM Results  

RM Education 

46,458 

3,248 

575 

2,764 

963 

54,008 

7,164 

23,515 

2,718 

- 

312 

- 

26,545 

4,268 

Revenue

UK

Europe

North America

Asia

Rest of the world

Adjusted profit from operations 
(see note below)

Investment income

Adjusted finance costs

Adjusted profit before tax

Adjustments (see note 1)

Profit before tax

6464

Total 
£000 

191,751 

4,404 

1,200 

3,099 

2,090 

202,544 

476 

(924)

18,078 

(2,321)

15,757 

Total 
£000 

250,634 

6,353 

597 

3,102 

1,073 

261,759 

17,209 

730 

(1,490)

16,449 

(7,014)

9,435 

In the year ended 30 November 2014 Corporate Services adjusted profit from operations includes £1,272,000 in respect of 
costs paid by the Group related to the Defined Benefit Pension Scheme. In 2013 the equivalent costs of £897,000 have been 
consistently allocated to Corporate Services, with no impact on overall adjusted profit from operations.

Year ended 30 November 2013

£000

£000

£000

RM Resources 

RM Results  

RM Education 

Corporate 
Services 

£000

Total 
£000 

Adjusted profit from operations as 
previously disclosed

Adjustment in respect of costs 
paid by the Group related to the 
Defined Benefit Pension Scheme

Segmental profit for 2013 
comparable to 2014

7,164 

4,134 

8,643 

(2,732)

17,209 

- 

134 

763 

(897)

- 

7,164 

4,268 

9,406 

(3,629)

17,209 

Segmental assets

At 30 November 2014

Segmental

Other

Total assets

At 30 November 2013

Segmental

Other

Total assets

RM Resources 

RM Results  

RM Education 

£000

33,970 

£000

6,636 

£000

27,334 

Corporate 
Services 

£000

353 

RM Resources 

RM Results  

RM Education 

Corporate Services 

£000

31,794 

£000

6,890 

£000

33,728 

£000

221 

Total 
£000 

68,293 

57,083 

125,376 

Total 
£000 

72,633 

68,048 

140,681 

Included within the disclosed segmental assets are non-current assets (excluding deferred tax assets) of £24,552,000 
(2013: £26,311,000) located in the United Kingdom and £432,000 (2013: £556,000) located in India. Other non-segmented 
assets includes other receivables, tax assets and cash and short-term deposits.

65

 
Note

13 

13 

12 

14 

6 

5. Profit for the year
Profit for the year is stated after charging/(crediting):

Amortisation of acquisition related intangible assets

Amortisation of other intangible assets

Impairment of goodwill

Depreciation of property, plant and equipment:

- charged in cost of sales

- charged in operating expenses

Impairment of property plant and equipment

Selling and distribution costs

Research and development costs

Administrative expenses - adjusted

Operating expenses - adjusted

Adjustments to administrative expenses 
(see Consolidated Income Statement)

Total operating expenses

Gain on disposals of property, plant and equipment

Loss on disposals of other intangible assets

Cost of inventories recognised as expense

Staff costs

Operating lease expense

Foreign exchange loss

(Decrease)/increase in inventory obsolescence provision

Fees payable to the Company's auditor

Fees payable to the Company's auditor for the audit 
of these Financial Statements:

 - the audit of the Company's Financial Statements

 - the audit of the Company's subsidiaries pursuant to legislation

Other fees payable to the Company's auditor:

 - other services pursuant to legislation

 - tax compliance services

 - corporate finance services

6666

Year ended 
30 November 2014 

Year ended 
30 November 2013 

£000

303 

417 

- 

720 

992 

1,668 

2,660 

755 

3,415 

27,922 

10,520 

18,602 

57,044 

2,052 

59,096 

(398)

73 

54,290 

69,147 

4,070 

156 

(1,394)

16 

167 

15 

- 

2 

200 

£000

195 

582 

328 

1,105 

1,475 

2,444 

3,919 

- 

3,919 

31,204 

10,665 

14,888 

56,757 

6,855 

63,612 

(118)

736 

89,801 

87,247 

4,348 

354 

983 

15 

162 

14 

7 

4 

202 

6. Staff numbers and costs
The average number of persons employed by the Group during the year was as follows:

Research and development, products and services

Marketing and sales

Corporate Services

Aggregate emoluments of persons employed by the Group comprised:

Wages and salaries

Termination payments

Social security costs

Other pension costs

Share-based payments (note 25)

Year ended 
30 November 2014 

Year ended 
30 November 2013 

Number

1,525 

209 

136 

1,870 

Number

1,645 

293 

210 

2,148 

Year ended 
30 November 2014 

Year ended 
30 November 2013 

£000

56,891 

838 

5,332 

5,154 

932 

69,147 

£000

69,740 

4,942 

6,227 

5,831 

507 

87,247 

The Company employs no staff (2013: none)

Information regarding the remuneration of the Directors is shown in the Remuneration Report.

7. Investment income

Bank interest

Income on sale of finance lease debt

Other finance income 

8. Finance costs

Year ended 
30 November 2014 

Year ended 
30 November 2013 

£000

242 

55 

179 

476 

£000

223 

289 

218 

730 

Year ended 
30 November 2014 

Year ended 
30 November 2013 

Note

Interest on bank overdrafts and loans

Borrowing facilities arrangement fees and commitment fees

Cost of leasing finance

Finance lease interest

Net finance costs on Defined Benefit Pension Scheme

23 

Unwind of discount on long-term contract provisions

Unwind of discount on onerous lease and dilapidations provisions

21 

£000

- 

467 

- 

21 

379 

57 

269 

1,193 

£000

15 

495 

130 

20 

830 

- 

159 

1,649 

67

9. Tax
Analysis of tax charge in the Consolidated Income Statement

Current taxation

UK corporation tax 

Adjustment in respect of prior years

Overseas tax

Total current tax charge

Deferred taxation

Temporary differences

Adjustment in respect of prior years

Overseas tax

Total deferred tax (credit)/charge

Total Consolidated Income Statement tax charge

Year ended 
30 November 2014 

Year ended 
30 November 2013 

£000

3,117 

627 

437 

4,181 

34 

(57)

- 

(23)

4,158 

£000

1,707 

859 

453 

3,019 

206 

93 

(51)

248 

3,267 

Analysis of tax (credit)/charge in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income 

UK corporation tax

Defined Benefit Pension Scheme

Deferred tax

Defined Benefit Pension Scheme movements

Defined Benefit Pension Scheme escrow

Share based payments

Total Consolidated Statement of 
Comprehensive Income tax (credit)/charge

Year ended 
30 November 2014 

Year ended 
30 November 2013 

£000

(1,533)

(2,185)

(660)

(657)

(5,035)

£000

(735)

1,534 

- 

(73)

726 

6868

Reconciliation of Consolidated Income Statement tax charge

The tax charge in the Consolidated Income Statement reconciles to the effective rate applied by the Group as follows:

Year ended 30 November 2014

Year ended 30 November 2013

Adjusted 

Adjustments  

£000 

£000 

Total 

£000 

Adjusted 

Adjustments 

£000 

£000 

Total 

£000 

Profit before tax

18,078 

(2,321)

15,757 

16,449 

(7,014)

9,435 

Tax at 21.67% (2013: 23.33%) thereon:

3,918 

(503)

3,415 

3,839 

(1,637)

2,202 

Effects of:

- change in tax rate on carried forward 
deferred tax assets

- other expenses not deductible for 
tax purposes

- temporary timing differences 
unrecognised for deferred tax

- other temporary timing differences

- R&D tax credit

- impairments

- overseas tax

- gain on sale of operations

- prior period adjustments

Tax charge in the 
Consolidated Income Statement

- 

104 

4 

- 

(77)

- 

207 

- 

203 

- 

- 

- 

28 

- 

- 

- 

(93)

367 

- 

224 

(23)

201 

104 

373 

(186)

187 

4 

(331)

28 

(77)

- 

207 

(93)

570 

- 

(242)

(29)

124 

- 

952 

- 

- 

- 

297 

- 

(94)

- 

(331)

- 

(242)

268 

124 

(94)

952 

4,359 

(201)

4,158 

4,910 

(1,643)

3,267 

Factors that may affect future tax charges

The Finance Act 2013 confirmed the reduction in the UK corporation tax rate to 20% in 2015. This will reduce the Group’s future 
tax charge accordingly.

The deferred tax asset at 30 November 2014 has been calculated based on the rate of 20% which had been substantively 
enacted at the balance sheet date.

69

Deferred tax

The Group has recognised deferred tax assets as these are anticipated to be recoverable against profits in future periods. 
The major deferred tax assets and liabilities recognised by the Group and movements thereon are as follows: 

Defined 

 benefit pension 

Acquisition 

Short-term 

related 

Accelerated tax 

scheme 

Share-based 

timing 

intangible 

Group

At 1 December 2012

Credit/(charge) to income

Credit/(charge) to equity

At 30 November 2013

Credit/(charge) to income

Credit to equity

At 30 November 2014

depreciation 

obligation 

payments 

differences 

£000

1,223 

(235)

- 

988 

(201)

- 

787 

£000

4,700 

- 

(1,534)

3,166 

- 

2,185 

5,351 

£000

30 

78 

73 

181 

178 

657 

£000

599 

(159)

- 

440 

(15)

660 

1,016 

1,085 

assets 

£000

(221)

68 

- 

(153)

61 

- 

(92)

Total 

£000 

6,331 

(248)

(1,461)

4,622 

23 

3,502 

8,147 

Certain deferred tax assets and liabilities have been offset above.

The Group has recognised deferred tax assets in jurisdictions where these are expected to be recoverable against profits 
in future periods. At the balance sheet date, the Group has an unrecognised gross deferred tax asset of £3,227,000 
(2013: £1,200,000) which is available for offset against future profits within the United States of America. Included within this 
balance are unrecognised tax losses of £3,206,000 (2013: £1,500,000). A deferred tax asset has not been recognised in respect of 
any of this amount due to uncertainty surrounding the future use of these losses.

No deferred tax liability is recognised on temporary differences of £203,000 (2013: £240,000) relating to the unremitted earnings 
of overseas subsidiaries as the Group is able to control the timings of the reversal of these temporary differences and it is 
probable that they will not reverse in the foreseeable future.

7070

10. Earnings per ordinary share 

Year ended 30 November 2014

Year ended 30 November 2013

Weighted 

average 

Weighted 

average 

Profit for 

number of 

Pence per 

 the year 

£000 

shares  

000 

share  

Profit for 

 the year 

£000 

number of 

Pence per 

shares  

000 

share  

Basic earnings per ordinary share

Basic earnings

Adjustments*

11,599 

83,702 

2,120 

- 

Adjusted basic earnings

13,719 

83,702 

Diluted earnings per ordinary share

Basic earnings

Effect of dilutive potential ordinary 
shares: share-based payment awards

Diluted earnings

Adjustments*

11,599 

83,702 

- 

5,346 

11,599 

89,048 

2,120 

- 

Adjusted diluted earnings

13,719 

89,048 

* Refer to note 1 for an explanation of adjustments to profits.

13.9 

2.5 

16.4 

13.9 

(0.9)

13.0 

2.4 

15.4 

6,168 

5,371 

91,718 

- 

11,539 

91,718 

6,168 

91,718 

- 

1,153 

6,168 

5,371 

92,871 

- 

11,539 

92,871 

6.7 

5.9 

12.6 

6.7 

(0.1)

6.6 

5.8 

12.4 

The weighted average number of shares for the year ended 30 November 2014 has been calculated based upon the weighted 
average of the number of ordinary shares of 2p each and ordinary shares of 22/7p each following the share consolidation 
(see note 22). 

11. Dividends 
Amounts recognised as distributions to equity holders were:

Final dividend for the year ended 30 November 2013 
of 2.46p per share (2012: 2.25p) 

Special dividend for the year ended 30 November 2013 
of 16.00p per share (2012: nil)

Interim dividend for the year ended 30 November 2014 
of 0.96p per share (2013: 0.84p)

Year ended 
30 November 2014 

Year ended 
30 November 2013 

£000

2,257 

14,678 

771 

17,706 

£000

2,064 

- 

770 

2,834 

The proposed final dividend of 3.04p per share for the year ended 30 November 2014 was approved by the Board on 30 
January 2015. The dividend is subject to approval by shareholders at the annual general meeting. The anticipated cost of this 
dividend is £2,460,000, which is not included as a liability at 30 November 2014. 

71

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
12. Goodwill 

Group

Cost

At 1 December 2012, 30 November 2013 and 30 November 2014

Accumulated impairment

At 1 December 2012

Impairment loss

At 30 November 2013 and 30 November 2014

Carrying amount

At 30 November 2013 and 30 November 2014

The discount rates used for goodwill impairment reviews and the carrying amount of goodwill is allocated as follows:

RM Resources - TTS Group Limited

RM Results 

2014

2013

Pre tax 

discount rate

Pre tax 

£000 

discount rate

10.2%

11.5%

11,111 

2,956 

14,067 

11.8%

12.0%

£000 

23,761

9,366 

328 

9,694

14,067

£000 

11,111 

2,956 

14,067 

Further information pertaining to the performance and future strategy of the divisions can be found within the 
Strategic Report. 

A review of the forecast future cash flows of TTS Group Limited and of RM Results indicated no impairment was required.

The recoverable amounts of the Cash Generating Units (‘CGU’) are determined from value in use calculations. The key 
assumptions for the value in use calculations are those regarding the discount rates and growth rates. 

The Group monitors its post-tax Weighted Average Cost of Capital and those of its competitors using market data. In 
considering the discount rates applying to CGUs, the Directors have considered the relative sizes, risks and the inter-
dependencies of its CGUs and their relatively narrow operation within the education products and services market. The 
impairment reviews use a discount rate adjusted for pre-tax cash flows. Analysis of the sensitivity of the resultant impairment 
reviews to changes in the discount rate is included below.

The Group prepares cash flow forecasts derived from the most recent annual financial plan approved by the Board, which also 
contains forecasts for the two years following, and extrapolates cash flows based on internal forecasts with terminal rates of 
between 0% and 3% (2013: between 0% and 3%).

Sensitivity analysis

The sensitivity of goodwill carrying values to reasonably possible changes in key assumptions has been performed. No 
changes produce a significant movement in the carrying value of goodwill allocated to a CGU and therefore no sensitivity 
analysis is presented.

7272

13. Other intangible assets

Acquisition 

Intellectual 

related 

Customer 

property & 

intangible 

Other 

relationships 

Brands 

database assets 

assets sub-total 

software assets 

£000

£000

£000

£000

£000

Total 

£000 

Group

Cost

At 1 December 2012

1,599 

564 

325 

2,488 

10,336 

12,824 

Additions

Effect of movements in 
exchange rates

Disposals

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

At 30 November 2013

1,599 

564 

325 

2,488 

Additions

Effect of movements in 
exchange rates

Disposals

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

68 

(29)

(7,686)

2,689 

1 

9 

68 

(29)

(7,686)

5,177 

1 

9 

(73)

(73)

At 30 November 2014

1,599 

564 

325 

2,488 

2,626 

5,114 

Accumulated amortisation 
and impairment

At 1 December 2012

Charge for the year

Effect of movements in 
exchange rates

Disposals

At 30 November 2013

Charge for the year

Effect of movements in 
exchange rates

At 30 November 2014

Carrying amount

At 30 November 2014

At 30 November 2013

994 

124 

1 

- 

1,119 

191 

- 

1,310 

289 

480 

209 

71 

- 

- 

280 

112 

- 

392 

172 

284 

325 

- 

- 

- 

325 

- 

- 

1,528 

195 

1 

- 

1,724 

303 

8,058 

582 

9,586 

777 

(27)

(26)

(6,950)

1,663 

417 

(6,950)

3,387 

720 

- 

9 

9 

325 

2,027 

2,089 

4,116 

- 

- 

461 

764 

537 

1,026 

998 

1,790 

A review of other intangible assets at the balance sheet date indicated there was no additional impairment loss in 
the year ended 30 November 2014 (2013: £nil).

The carrying amount of Acquisition related intangible assets and Other software assets at 30 November 2014 
include impairment losses of £443,000 (2013: £443,000) and £275,000 (2013: £275,000) respectively.

The carrying amount of Other software assets at 30 November 2014 included purchased software assets of £9,000 
(2013: £68,000), and internally developed software assets of £528,000 (2013: £958,000).

During the year, no material expenditure on research and development is considered to have met the criteria whereby the 
expenditure is capitalised as an intangible asset (2013: £nil). The carrying amount of capitalised research and development at 
30 November 2014 was £nil (2013: £nil). 

73

 
 
 
 
 
 
14. Property, plant and equipment

Freehold land & 

Short leasehold 

Plant & 

Computer 

buildings 

improvements 

equipment 

equipment 

Vehicles 

£000

£000

£000

£000

£000

Total 

£000 

Group

Cost

At 1 December 2012

2,779 

4,493 

9,186 

13,547 

4,214 

34,219 

Additions

Effect of movements in 
exchange rates

Assets reclassified

Disposals

At 30 November 2013

Additions

Effect of movements in 
exchange rates

Disposals

- 

- 

- 

- 

2,779 

314 

- 

(81)

199 

(46)

48 

(135)

4,559 

1,216 

12 

- 

At 30 November 2014

3,012 

5,787 

Accumulated depreciation 
and impairment

2,753 

534 

(15)

12 

(135)

3,149 

432 

6 

379 

- 

785 

98 

- 

- 

- 

883 

97 

- 

- 

(67)

913 

At 1 December 2012

Charge for the year

Effect of movements in 
exchange rates

Assets reclassified

Disposals

At 30 November 2013

Charge for the year

Effect of movements in 
exchange rates

Impairment

Disposals

At 30 November 2014

Carrying value

At 30 November 2014

At 30 November 2013

175 

(98)

(48)

(4,448)

4,767 

383 

30 

(392)

4,788 

6,760 

1,022 

(69)

(12)

(4,435)

3,266 

559 

25 

69 

(387)

1,531 

(143)

1 

(8,018)

6,918 

583 

45 

75 

(20)

(1)

(1,409)

2,859 

101 

7 

1,980 

(307)

- 

(14,010)

21,882 

2,597 

94 

(156)

(1,457)

(2,086)

7,390 

1,510 

22,487 

10,161 

2,320 

22,779 

1,546 

(112)

2 

(7,859)

3,738 

1,196 

37 

277 

(142)

719 

(11)

(2)

(1,279)

1,747 

376 

4 

3,919 

(207)

- 

(13,708)

12,783 

2,660 

72 

30 

755 

(1,227)

(1,823)

3,966 

3,532 

5,106 

930 

14,447 

2,099 

1,896 

1,821 

1,410 

1,256 

1,501 

2,284 

3,180 

580 

1,112 

8,040 

9,099 

The carrying value of vehicles at the year end included £444,000 (2013: £1,032,000) held under finance leases. 

7474

 
 
 
15. Investments in subsidiary undertakings
The principal subsidiary undertakings of the Company at 30 November 2014 were: 

Name

RM Books Limited

RM Education Limited

Principal activity

Country of  
incorporation

Class of 
share

Software services

England

Ordinary

Software, services & systems

England

Ordinary

% held

100%

100%

RM Education Solutions India Pvt Limited *

Software and corporate services

India

Ordinary

100%

Space Kraft Limited

TTS Group Limited

Resource supply

England

Ordinary

100%

Resource supply

England

Ordinary

100%

* Held through subsidiary undertaking.

The investment in subsidiary undertakings comprises:

Company

Cost

At 1 December 2012

Disposals

Share-based payments

At 30 November 2013

Investment in RM Education Limited

Share-based payments

At 30 November 2014

Accumulated impairment

At 1 December 2012

Impairment loss

Disposals

At 30 November 2013

Reversal of impairment

At 30 November 2014

Carrying value

At 30 November 2014

At 30 November 2013

Capital contribution 

Investment in 

shared-based 

share capital 

payments 

Quasi-equity loan 

£000

£000

£000

46,281 

(1,014)

- 

45,267 

11,920 

- 

57,187 

6,245 

555 

(956)

5,844 

(2,932)

2,912 

54,275 

39,423 

8,541 

- 

507 

9,048 

- 

932 

9,980 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

9,980 

9,048 

7,077 

- 

- 

7,077 

(7,077)

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

7,077 

Total 

£000

61,899 

(1,014)

507 

61,392 

4,843 

932 

67,167 

6,245 

555 

(956)

5,844 

(2,932)

2,912 

64,255 

55,548 

The Company purchased an additional 32 shares in its subsidiary undertaking, RM Education Limited, during the year. 
The consideration was £11,920,000, satisfied by a reduction of £7,077,500 in the quasi-equity loan and £4,842,500 
in additional capital funding. 

The impairment loss at 30 November 2014 applied primarily to the Company’s investment in Space Kraft Limited (£2,824,000). 
The impairment loss in RM Education Limited was reversed in the year (2013: Space Kraft Limited increase of £555,000).

The assumptions for the impairment reviews performed are outlined in note 12. 

75

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
16. Inventories

Group

Components

Work in progress

Finished goods

17. Long-term contracts

Group

Contract costs incurred plus recognised profits less recognised losses to date

Less: Progress billings

Amounts due from contract customers included in trade and other receivables

Amounts due to contract customers included in trade and other payables

2014 

£000 

141 

- 

10,463 

10,604 

2013 

£000 

845 

87 

9,617 

10,549 

Note

2014 

£000 

2013 

£000 

440,840 

375,058 

(472,006)

(402,095)

(31,166)

(27,037)

18 

20 

154 

671 

(31,320)

(27,708)

(31,166)

(27,037)

Total revenue from long-term contracts recognised in the year ended 30 November 2014 amounted to £69,600,000 
(2013: £91,100,000).

Long-term contract outcome – estimation uncertainty

The Group’s long-term contracts represent a significant part of the Group’s business. As a result of the accounting for these 
contracts, as outlined in note 2, it is necessary for the Directors to assess the outcome of each contract and also estimate 
future costs and contracted revenues to establish ultimate contract profitability. Key judgements include performance 
indicator outcomes, future inflation rates, implementation/software development costs and whether the contract variations 
and extensions should be combined with existing arrangements. Profit is then recognised based on these judgements 
and, depending on the maturity of the contract portfolio, a greater or lesser proportion of Group profit will arise from 
long-term contracts.

Sensitivity to assumptions has been considered but due to their nature it is not practicable to perform an analysis. 

7676

 
 
 
18. Trade and other receivables

Group

Company

Note

2014 

£000 

2013 

£000 

2014 

£000 

2013 

£000 

Current

Financial assets

Trade receivables

Long-term contract balances

17

Other receivables

Accrued income

Amounts owed by Group undertakings

Non-financial assets

Prepayments

Non-current

Financial assets

Other receivables 

Currency profile of receivables

Sterling

US Dollar

Euro

Indian Rupee

24,830 

24,599 

154 

1,308 

1,571 

- 

671 

474 

2,990 

- 

27,863 

28,734 

5,065 

32,928 

6,400 

35,134 

- 

- 

6 

- 

14,366 

14,372 

- 

14,372 

- 

- 

- 

- 

104 

104 

- 

104 

1,878 

34,806 

1,911 

37,045 

1,628 

16,000 

1,661 

1,765 

34,387 

36,748 

16,000 

1,765 

163 

- 

256 

17 

56 

224 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

34,806 

37,045 

16,000 

1,765 

A reclassification has been made in the Group comparative figures for 2013 reallocating £2,833,000 of balances previously 
included within trade receivables to accrued income reflecting the un-billed nature of these long-term contract related 
recoverable amounts.

The amounts owed by Group undertakings to the Company are repayable on demand and bear interest at LIBOR plus 2%.

The Directors consider that the carrying amounts of trade and other receivables approximates their fair values.

The Company’s Non-current Other receivables are the gross amounts owed by the Company’s equity investments in BSF 
delivery companies, Newham Learning Partnership (PSP) Ltd and Essex Schools (Holdings) Ltd. The interest charged on these 
receivables is 11.75% pa. 

77

Analysis of trade receivables by type of customer

Group

Government 

Commercial

2014 

£000 

10,016 

14,814 

24,830 

2013 

£000 

10,482 

14,117 

24,599 

Trade receivables included an allowance for estimated irrecoverable amounts at 30 November 2014 of £1,361,000 
(2013: £1,777,000), based on management’s knowledge of the customer, externally available information and expected 
payment likelihood. This allowance has been determined by reference to specific receivable balances and past 
default experience. New customers are subject to credit checks where available, using third party databases prior to 
being accepted. 

Ageing of unimpaired trade receivables

Group

Not past due

Overdue by less than 60 days

Overdue by between 60 and 90 days

Overdue by more than 90 days

19. Cash and short-term deposits

Cash and cash equivalents

Short-term deposits

2014 

£000 

18,128 

3,955 

1,074 

1,673 

2013 

£000 

18,273 

5,622 

323 

381 

24,830 

24,599 

Group

Company

2014 

£000 

41,893 

6,000 

47,893 

2013 

£000 

57,169 

6,000 

63,169 

2014 

£000 

2013 

£000 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

The short-term deposits are for a maximum period of 6 months at interest rates of 0.80-0.85%.

The interest and currency profile of cash and short-term deposits is disclosed in note 28.

7878

 
Group

Company

Note

2014 

£000 

2013 

£000 

2014 

£000 

2013 

£000 

20. Trade and other payables

Current liabilities

Financial liabilities

Trade payables

Amounts owed to Group undertakings

Other taxation and social security

Other payables

Accruals

Obligations under finance leases

Derivative financial instruments

12,793 

12,163 

- 

- 

29,002 

- 

4,673 

2,066 

230 

3 

14,041 

18,395 

3,019 

1,848 

350 

544 

27,708 

64,027 

14,890 

78,917 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

29,002 

- 

29,002 

- 

- 

- 

- 

Long-term contract balances

17 

31,320 

Non-financial liabilities

Deferred income

Non-current liabilities

Financial liabilities

65,126 

13,959 

79,085 

Obligations under finance leases

49 

438 

Non-financial liabilities

Deferred income

 due after one year but within two years

 due after two years but within five years

1,077 

531 

1,657 

1,827 

1,190 

3,455 

The amounts owed to Group undertakings by the Company are payable on demand and bear interest at LIBOR plus 2%.

80,742 

82,372 

29,002 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

79

 
 
Currency profile of trade and other payables

Sterling

US Dollar

Euro

Indian rupee

Group

Company

2014 

£000 

79,752 

208 

80 

754 

2013 

£000 

80,284 

1,364 

193 

531 

2014 

£000 

29,002 

- 

- 

- 

80,794 

82,372 

29,002 

2013 

£000 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

The Directors consider that the carrying amount of trade and other payables approximates their fair value.   

Amounts payable under finance lease contracts

Group

Within one year

In the second to fifth years inclusive

Less: finance charges allocated to future periods

Present value of minimum lease payments

2014

2013

Present value of 

Present value of 

Minimum lease 

minimum lease 

Minimum 

minimum lease 

payments 

payments 

 lease payments 

payments 

£000

236 

49 

285 

(6)

279 

£000

230 

49 

279 

- 

279 

£000

373 

446 

819 

(31)

788 

£000

350 

438 

788 

- 

788 

Interest charged on vehicle finance lease contracts is at the Bank of England base rate plus 2% fixed at the date of acquiring 
the asset, and the vehicles are leased until they are 4 years old. 

8080

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
21. Provisions

Group

At 1 December 2012

Utilisation of provisions

Release of provisions

Increase in provisions

Effect of movements in exchange rates

Unwind of discount

At 30 November 2013

Utilisation of provisions

Release of provisions

Increase in provisions

Effect of movements in exchange rates

Unwind of discount

At 30 November 2014

Onerous lease 

Employee-related 

 and dilapidations 

restructuring 

£000

6,409 

(1,331)

- 

2,627 

21 

159 

7,885 

(836)

(524)

1,298 

2 

269 

8,094 

£000

453 

(1,154)

- 

4,942 

- 

- 

4,241 

(4,348)

(366)

838 

- 

- 

365 

Other 

£000 

2,175 

(52)

(1,092)

320 

(21)

- 

1,330 

(289)

(431)

95 

3 

- 

708 

Total 

£000 

9,037 

(2,537)

(1,092)

7,889 

- 

159 

13,456 

(5,473)

(1,321)

2,231 

5 

269 

9,167 

Provisions for onerous leases and dilapidations have been recognised at the present value of the expected obligation 
at discount rates of 3% reflecting a risk free discount rate applicable to the liabilities. These discounts will unwind 
to their undiscounted value over the remaining lives of the leases via a finance cost within the Income Statement. 
At 30 November 2014, £5,738,000 (2013: £5,587,000) of the provision refers to onerous leases, and £2,356,000 (2013: £2,298,000) 
refers to dilapidations. 

The average remaining life of the leases at 30 November 2014 is 5.1 years (2013: 2.1 years). Given the lengths remaining on 
onerous leases and current market conditions, no assumption has been made for the Group’s ability to sub-let, with any sub-
letting likely to result in a release of a proportion of the provision held. 

Employee-related restructuring provisions refer to costs arising from restructuring to meet the future needs of the Group and 
are all expected to be utilised during the following financial year. 

Other provisions includes one-off items not covered by any other category. The major release of Group provisions during the 
year relates to the provision within RM plc Company (see below). The significant elements in the provision at 30 November 
2014 continue to be related to on-going legal activity and provisions recognised as part of the exit of operations, both of which 
were included in the previous year. 

81

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Disclosure of provisions

Group

Current liabilities

Non-current liabilities

Company 
Non-current liabilities

At 1 December 2012

Release of provisions

At 30 November 2013

Release of provisions

Increase in provisions

At 30 November 2014

2014 

£000

3,660 

5,507 

9,167 

2013 

£000

7,201 

6,255 

13,456 

£000 

629 

(200)

429 

(429)

4,893 

4,893 

The Company’s outstanding provisions at 1 December 2013 relating to warranties on businesses sold in previous years has 
been released to the Income Statement as it is no longer required.

The increase in provisions during the year relates to the guarantee of an intergroup balance between subsidiary undertakings.

The Directors consider that the carrying amounts of provisions in the Group and the Company approximate their fair value.

Total

£000 

1,870 

- 

19 

22. Share capital

Company and Group

Ordinary shares of 2p

Ordinary shares of 22/7p

Allotted, called-up and fully paid

Number, 000

£000 

Number, 000

At 1 December 2012 and 30 November 2013

93,515 

1,870 

- 

£000 

- 

Share consolidation

Issued in the year

At 30 November 2014

(93,515)

(1,870)

81,826 

1,870 

- 

- 

- 

- 

814 

19 

82,640 

1,889 

1,889 

During the year 800,000 ordinary shares of 22/7p were issued to the RM plc Employee Share Trust at par, and 14,000 shares 
options were exercised at an exercise price of £1.54 from the Employee share option scheme.

Ordinary shares issued carry no right to fixed income. 

23. Retirement benefit schemes
a) Defined contribution scheme

The Group operates or contributes to a number of defined contribution schemes for the benefit of qualifying employees. 
The assets of these schemes are held separately from those of the Company. The total cost charged to income of £4,914,000 
(2013: £5,555,000) represents contributions payable to these schemes by the Group at rates specified in employment 
contracts. At 30 November 2014 £373,000 (2013: £465,000) due in respect of the current financial year had not been paid over 
to the schemes.

8282

b) Local government pension schemes

The Group has TUPE employees who retain membership of local government pension schemes. The Group makes payments 
to these schemes for current service costs in accordance with its contractual obligations, most of which are limited through 
reimbursement rights under the contracts. The total costs charged to income for these schemes was £240,000 (2013: £276,000). 
The amount due in respect of these schemes at 30 November 2014 was £28,000 (2013: £24,000).

c) Defined Benefit Pension Scheme

One Group sponsored Defined Benefit Pension Scheme is in operation, the Research Machines plc 1988 Pension Scheme 
(“Scheme”). The Scheme is a funded scheme. The Scheme provides benefits to qualifying employees and former 
employees of RM Education Limited, but was closed to new members with effect from 1 January 2003 and closed to future 
accrual of benefits from 31 October 2012. The assets of the Scheme are held separately from RM Education Limited’s 
in a trustee-administered fund. The Trustee is a limited company. Directors of the Trustee company are appointed by 
RM Education Ltd and by members.

Under the Scheme, employees were entitled to retirement benefits of 1/60th of final salary for each qualifying year on 
attainment of retirement age of 60 or 65 years and additional benefits based on the value of individual accounts. No other 
post-retirement benefits were provided by the Scheme.

The most recent actuarial valuation of Scheme assets and the present value of the defined benefit obligation was carried out 
for statutory funding purposes at 31 May 2012 by a qualified independent actuary. IAS 19 Employee Benefits liabilities have 
been rolled forward based on this valuation’s base data.

As at 31 May 2012, the triennial valuation for statutory funding purposes showed a deficit of £53,500,000 (31 May 2009: 
£16,600,000). RM Education Limited agreed with the Scheme Trustees that it will repay this amount via deficit catch up 
payments of £4,000,000 per annum until 31 May 2013 and thereafter at £3,600,000 per annum until 31 May 2027. There was one 
month’s deficit payment of £300,000 outstanding at 30 November 2014 (2013: £300,000). The next triennial valuation of the 
Scheme is due as at 31 May 2015 and may result in changes to the level of deficit catch up payments required.

A further £8,000,000 contribution was paid into an escrow account established during the year, the form of use of which within 
the Scheme is required to be agreed by RM Education Limited and the Scheme Trustee.

In October 2014, £4,700,000 of this was paid to the Scheme from the escrow account to help fund a pension buy-in, the income 
from which will closely match payments to all 165 existing pensioners. Such a buy-in largely eliminates the inflation, interest 
rate and longevity risks associated with these pension benefits. The transaction covered liabilities in respect of 9% of the 
Scheme members and around 13% of the total Scheme liability. The insurance premium payable under the buy-in agreement 
was £30,700,000. The insurance premium was funded by way of £26,000,000 of fixed income assets from the Scheme and 
£4,700,000 paid from the escrow account. This leaves £3,300,000 remaining in the escrow account to be used for future risk 
reduction exercises.

Scheme assets are measured at bid-price at 30 November 2014. The present value of the defined benefit obligation was 
measured using the projected unit method.

The entire deficit position of the Scheme is held within these Financial Statements on the balance sheet as 
RM Education Limited in substance bears all of the material risks associated with the Scheme.

The parent company RM plc has entered into a guarantee in respect of the £3,600,000 annual deficit recovery payments 
agreed with the Trustees in 2012. The guarantee for the deficit recovery remains in place on condition that the assumptions 
underlying the valuation in 2012 remain materially unchanged for all subsequent triennial valuations undertaken.

No liability has been recognised for this within the Company as the Directors consider that the likelihood of it being called 
upon is remote.

83

Amounts recognised in the Income Statement and in the Statement of Comprehensive Income

Year ended 
30 November 2014 

Year ended 
30 November 2013 

Note

8 

Administrative expenses and taxes

Operating expense

Interest cost

Interest on Scheme assets

Net interest expense

Expense recognised in the Income Statement

Effect of changes in demographic assumptions

Effect of changes in financial assumptions

Total actuarial losses

Return on Scheme assets excluding interest on Scheme assets

(Expense)/income recognised in the Statement of Comprehensive Income

(Expense)/income recognised in Total Comprehensive Income

Reconciliation of the Scheme assets and obligations through the year

Assets

At start of period

Interest on Scheme assets

Return on Scheme assets excluding interest on Scheme assets

Administrative expenses

Contributions from Group

Benefits paid

At end of period

Obligations

At start of period

Interest cost

Actuarial losses 

Benefits paid

At end of period

Deficit in Scheme and obligation recognised on the Balance Sheet

£000

(475)

(475)

(7,513)

7,134 

(379)

(854)

1,198 

(26,666)

(25,468)

3,576 

(21,892)

(22,746)

£000

(391)

(391)

(6,722)

5,892 

(830)

(1,221)

- 

(8,199)

(8,199)

9,641 

1,442 

221 

Year ended 
30 November 2014 

Year ended 
30 November 2013 

£000

£000

147,688 

129,710 

7,134 

3,576 

(475)

11,821 

(3,905)

165,839 

(163,516)

(7,513)

(25,468)

3,905 

(192,592)

(26,753)

5,892 

9,641 

(391)

4,384 

(1,548)

147,688 

(150,143)

(6,722)

(8,199)

1,548 

(163,516)

(15,828)

8484

 
Reconciliation of net defined benefit obligation

Year ended 
30 November 2014 

Year ended 
30 November 2013 

Net obligation at the start of the year

Cost included in Income Statement

Scheme remeasurements included in the 
Statement of Comprehensive Income

Cash contribution

Deficit in Scheme and obligation recognised on the Balance Sheet

Obligation by participant status

Vested deferreds

Retirees

Value of Scheme assets 

Fair value of Scheme assets with a quoted market price

Cash and cash equivalents, including escrow

Equity instruments

Debt instruments

Value of unquoted Scheme assets

Insurance contract

Significant actuarial assumptions

Discount rate

Rate of RPI price inflation

Rate of CPI price inflation

Rate of pensions increases

pre 6 April 1997 service

pre 1 June 2005 service

post 31 May 2005 service

£000

(15,828)

(854)

(21,892)

11,821 

(26,753)

2014 

£000

169,392 

23,200 

192,592 

2014 

£000

3,469 

84,218 

54,952 

23,200 

165,839 

2014

3.85%

3.20%

2.30%

1.35%

3.30%

2.10%

£000

(20,433)

(1,221)

1,442 

4,384 

(15,828)

2013 

£000

145,944 

17,572 

163,516 

2013 

£000

416 

74,840 

72,432 

- 

147,688 

2013

4.65%

3.45%

2.55%

1.35%

3.30%

2.25%

Post retirement mortality table

S1NA CMI 2013 1.25% 

S1NA CMI 2011 1.25%

Weighted average duration of defined benefit obligation 

25 years

24 years

Assumed life expectancy on retirement at age 65:

Retiring today (male member aged 65)

Retiring in 20 years (male member aged 45)

22.3

24.1

22.5

24.2

85

 
 
 
Expected cash flows

Expected employer contributions per annum

Expected total benefit payments

Year 1

Year 2

Year 3

Year 4

Year 5

Years 6 - 10

£000 

3,984 

2,186 

2,247 

2,309 

2,373 

2,439 

13,247 

Sensitivities to assumptions - one item changed with all others held constant

------------------- 30 November 2014 -------------------

30 November 2013

-0.1%  

+0.1%  

discount 

discount 

Base 

£m

rate 

£m

rate 

-0.1% RPI 

+0.1% RPI 

Life +1 yr 

£m

£m

£m

£m

Analysis of net balance sheet position

Fair value of Scheme assets

165.8 

166.1 

165.5 

165.6 

166.0 

166.4 

Present value of Scheme obligations

(192.6)

(197.5)

(187.8)

(188.5)

(196.7)

(196.2)

Deficit

(26.8)

(31.4)

(22.3)

(22.9)

(30.7)

(29.8)

Actuarial assumptions

Discount rate

Rate of RPI

Rate of CPI

Mortality table 

Rating (years)

3.85% 3.75% 3.95% 3.85% 3.85% 3.85%

3.20% 3.20% 3.20% 3.10% 3.30% 3.20%

2.30% 2.30% 2.30% 2.20% 2.40% 2.30%

------------------- S1NA CMI 2013 1.25% ------------------- 

S1NA CMI 2011 1.25%

-

-

-

-

-

(1)

-

24. Own shares
The RM plc Employee Share Trust (EST) was established in March 2003 to hedge the future obligations of the Group in respect 
of shares awarded under the RM plc Co-Investment Plan, RM plc Performance Share Plan and Deferred Bonus Plan. The EST 
has waived any entitlement to the receipt of normal dividends in respect of all of its holding of the Company’s ordinary shares, 
and also waived its entitlement to the 2014 special dividend. The EST’s waiver of dividends may be revoked or varied at 
any time.

The trustee of the EST, Computershare Trustees (C.I.) Ltd, purchased 800,000 new ordinary shares during the year at nominal 
value, with funds provided by the Group.

8686

Base 

£m

147.7 

(163.5)

(15.8)

4.65%

3.45%

2.55%

Company and Group

At 1 December 2012

Additions

At 30 November 2013

Share-based payment awards exercised

Transfer from RML Staff Share Scheme

Share consolidation

Shares issued 

At 30 November 2014

Ordinary shares of 2p 

Ordinary shares of 22/7p 

Number 000

Number 000

1,797 

14 

1,811 

(40) 

1 

(1,772)

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

1,551 

800 

2,351 

The valuation of the shares is weighted average cost.   

25. Share-based payments
The Group operates the following executive and employee equity settled share-based payment schemes: 

£000

2,972 

- 

2,972 

(40)

- 

- 

18 

2,950 

a) employee share option schemes 

b) performance share plans 

c) staff share schemes. 

The fair values of awards made under these schemes have been assessed using Black-Scholes and Monte-Carlo models, as 
appropriate to the scheme, at the date of grant. The fair values of the schemes are expensed over the period between grant 
and vesting.

Share-based payment awards exercised in the period and disclosed in the statement of changes in equity represents the 
impact on retained earnings of releasing the fair value charge accrued under IFRS 2 Share-based payment, which for deferred 
bonus scheme is partially matched by the release of own-shares held.

a) Employee share option scheme

The Group has in place a share option scheme which issued options over shares in the Company. There have been various 
performance conditions attached to share option grants including EPS, share-price and share purchase conditions. Options 
are usually forfeited if an employee leaves the Group before the options vest. 

Details of share options outstanding are as follows:

Group

At 1 December 2012

Lapsed during the year

At 30 November 2013

Exercised during the year

Lapsed during the year

At 30 November 2014

Number of 

Weighted average 

share price at 

Weighted average 

 share options

exercise price

exercise

Exercise price range

3,112,900 

(1,569,500)

1,543,400 

(14,000)

(250,400)

1,279,000 

£1.37

£0.93

£1.81

£1.54

£1.58

£1.86

£0.51 - £2.05

£1.45 - £2.05

£1.54 - £2.05

£1.57

The options outstanding at 30 November 2014 had a weighted average contractual life of 2.4 years (2013: 3.0 years).

All of the outstanding options at the end of the current and prior period are exercisable. No option grants were made under 
this scheme in the current year (2013: nil).

87

 
 
 
 
b) Performance share plans

The Group uses performance share plans for the remuneration of senior executives and senior management. Details of 
Directors’ awards are contained within the Remuneration Report. Participation has been subject to various vesting conditions, 
including EPS, total shareholder return and share price conditions. If the participants leave the Group’s employment then in 
most circumstances the award lapses. 

Details of performance share plan shares are as follows: 

Group

At 1 December 2012

Granted during the year

Lapsed during the year

At 30 November 2013

Granted during the year

Lapsed during the year

At 30 November 2014

Maximum number of shares

Market price on grant

5,091,505 

1,615,000 

(1,112,238)

5,594,267 

1,755,000 

(2,003,444)

5,345,823 

£0.74

£1.55

The plans outstanding at 30 November 2014 had a weighted average contractual life of 1.3 years (2013: 1.3 years).

The fair values of shares granted during the year are determined using a Monte-Carlo model which gives a fair value of 
£1.01 per share under the TSR performance condition.

Inputs to the model are as follows:

Group

Share price at grant 

Exercise price 

Expected life

Expected dividends

4 August 2014 
TSR

£1.55

£nil

3 years

2.20%

The expected life used in the modelling has been adjusted, based on management’s best estimate, for the effects of non-
transferability and exercise restrictions.

Comparator company volatility is assessed using annualised, daily historic TSR growth assessed over a period prior to the 
date of grant that corresponds to the performance period of three years. The company correlation uses historic pairwise 
correlations of the companies over a three year period. The fair value of the TSR element is based on a large number of 
stochastic projections of Company and comparator TSR. 

In March 2003 the Company established the RM plc Employee Share Trust to hedge the future obligations of the Group in 
respect of shares schemes awarded. These shares are used to hedge the estimated liability but until vesting represents own 
shares held – see note 24.

c) Staff share schemes

The RM plc 2002 Staff Share Scheme historically made annual grants of shares in RM plc to almost all employees, although 
no awards were made in the current year or the prior year. At grant, the Trustee of the scheme purchased shares on the open 
market and held these in trust on behalf of the employees, hence the shares are not shown in the Group or Company balance 
sheets. The shares vest to the employees after a minimum of three years, but normally after five years. The scheme is an HMRC 
approved employee share scheme constituted under a trust. 

8888

 
The Scheme holds the following shares:

Ordinary shares of 2p 

Ordinary shares of 22/7p 

Group

RM plc 2002 Staff Share Scheme

RML Staff Share Scheme

At 1 December 2012

Sold or transferred

At 30 November 2013

RM plc 2002 Staff Share Scheme

RML Staff Share Scheme

At 30 November 2013

Transferred into own shares

Sold or transferred

Share consolidation

Sold or transferred

At 30 November 2014

RM plc 2002 Staff Share Scheme

Number

358,834 

1,361 

360,195 

(32,958)

327,237 

325,876 

1,361 

327,237 

(1,361)

(43,555)

(282,321)

- 

- 

- 

Number

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

246,827 

(40,261)

206,566 

206,566 

£000

588 

1 

589 

(54)

535 

534 

1 

535 

(1)

(71)

- 

(76)

387 

387 

These shares are held for staff and therefore not included in the Group or Company balance sheet.

d) Deferred bonus plan

The Group had in place a deferred bonus plan for the remuneration of executives and senior management. The remaining 
outstanding award vested in February 2014, and the Board has no plans to utilise this scheme in the future.

Details of deferred bonus grants outstanding are as follows:

Group

Number of bonus shares

Market price on grant

At 1 December 2012 and 30 November 2013

Released during the year 

At 30 November 2014

Performance conditions – estimation uncertainty

40,074 

(40,074)

- 

£1.30

Assigning a fair value charge to share-based payments requires estimation of: the projected share price; the number of 
instruments which are likely to vest; other non-market based performance conditions. Assigning a fair value charge requires 
continuing reassessment of these estimates.

26. Guarantees and contingent liabilities
Guarantees

The Company has entered into guarantees relating to the performance and liabilities of certain major contracts of its 
subsidiaries. The Directors are not aware of any circumstances that have given rise to any liability under such guarantees and 
consider the possibility of any arising to be remote.

Contingent liabilities

The Group has provided performance guarantees and indemnities relating to performance bonds and letters of credit issued 
by its banks on its behalf, in the ordinary course of business. The Directors are not aware of any circumstances that have given 
rise to any liability under such guarantees and indemnities and consider the possibility of any arising to be remote.

89

27. Commitments
Operating leases 

The Group had outstanding commitments for future minimum lease payments (to the next lease break or to the end of the 
lease, whichever is sooner) under non-cancellable operating leases which fall due as follows:

Group

Within 1 year

In years 2 to 5 inclusive

After year 5

2014 

£000 

3,347 

9,824 

621 

13,792 

2013 

£000 

3,593 

6,799 

1,461 

11,853 

Operating lease commitments represent rentals payable by the Group for certain of its office properties and include the period 
up to the first break clause of the lease.  

The terms of these leases are subject to renegotiation on average terms of 2.5 years (2013: 4.2 years) and rentals are fixed for an 
average of 2.0 years (2013: 1.7 years).  

The Company had no operating leases during the year. 

Capital commitments 

The Group had the following capital expenditure commitments:  

Group

Contracted but not provided for

The Company had no capital commitments at the end of either year.

28. Financial risk management
Carrying value of financial assets and financial liabilities

2014 

£000 

243 

2013 

£000 

- 

Group

Company

Financial assets

Trade and other receivables - current

27,863 

28,734 

14,372 

2014 

£000 

2013 

£000 

2014 

£000 

Trade and other receivables - non-current

Cash and short-term deposits

Financial liabilities

1,878 

47,893 

77,634 

1,911 

63,169 

93,814 

1,628 

- 

16,000 

1,765 

Trade and other payables - current

(65,126)

(64,027)

(29,002)

Trade and other payables - non-current

Provisions - current

Provisions - non-current

(49)

(3,660)

(5,507)

(438)

(7,201)

(6,255)

- 

- 

(4,893)

(74,342)

(77,921)

(33,895)

- 

- 

- 

(429)

(429)

All financial assets are classified as loans and receivables except for forward foreign exchange contracts of £565,000 
(2013: £4,000) which are classified as fair value through profit or loss. 

9090

2013 

£000 

104 

1,661 

- 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The Directors consider that the carrying amount of all financial assets and financial liabilities approximates their fair value. Fair 
value information for financial assets and financial liabilities not shown at fair value is therefore not disclosed. 

It is, and has been throughout the period under review, the Group’s policy that no trading in financial instruments shall be 
undertaken and the Group does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes.

The main risks arising from the Company’s financial assets and liabilities are market risk (foreign currency risk and interest rate 
risk), credit risk and liquidity risk. The Board reviews and agrees policies on a regular basis for managing the risks associated 
with these assets and liabilities.   

Foreign currency risk

Translation

During the year the Group held operations in the United States of America and India and trades internationally, exposing 
the Group to foreign exchange risk on non-Sterling assets, liabilities and cash flows. The individual Group companies have 
long-term intra-group loans of £8,905,000 (2013: £8,513,000) denominated in US dollars and the Group applies net investment 
hedging to the balances.

The Group also maintains foreign currency denominated cash accounts, but only holds balances required to settle 
its payables. 

Transaction

Operations are also subject to foreign exchange risk from transactions in currencies other than their functional currency, and 
once recognised, the revaluation of foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities. Principally, this relates to transactions 
arising in US dollars and Indian Rupees. Specifically, the Group purchases a proportion of its inventory in US dollars and 
operating costs in the Group’s subsidiary RM Education Solutions India Pvt Ltd are in Indian Rupees. 

In order to manage these risks the Group enters into derivative transactions in the form of forward foreign currency contracts. 
To manage the US dollar to Sterling risk, the forward foreign currency contracts purchased are designed to cover 85% of 
forecast currency denominated purchases and the contracts are set up to provide coverage over the fixed price periods of up 
to 12 months. To manage the Indian Rupee to Sterling risk, the contracts purchased are designed to cover 80% of forecast 
Rupee costs and are renewed on a revolving basis of approximately 11 to 12 months.

The total amount of outstanding forward foreign exchange contracts to which the Group was committed was: 

Group

Forward foreign exchange contracts

2014

2013

Nominal Value 

Fair Value 

Nominal Value 

Fair Value 

£000 

9,485 

£000 

562 

£000 

9,315 

£000 

(540)

The fair value of the derivative financial instruments is estimated by discounting the future contracted cash flow, using readily 
available market data and represents a level 2 measurement in the fair value hierarchy under IFRS 7. These fair value gains/
(losses) are included within trade and other receivables and trade and other payables respectively.

Of these, forward foreign currency exchange contracts with a nominal value of £9,500,000 (2013: £8,700,000) and fair value gain 
of £562,000 (2013: loss £528,000) have been designated as effective hedges in accordance with IAS 39 Financial Instruments: 
Recognition and Measurement. The movement in fair value of hedged derivative financial instruments during the year was a 
credit of £1,090,000 (2013: debit £529,000) which has been recognised in Other comprehensive income and presented in the 
hedging reserve in equity. In addition the Group retain the gain or loss on realised foreign currency contracts used to hedge 
non-financial assets which are realised when the asset is recognised. A fair value loss of £18,000 (2013: £54,000 gain) has been 
realised on forward contracts which were designated as effective hedges in accordance with IAS 39 Financial Instruments: 
Recognition and Measurement. The movement in value of realised forward contracts was a debit of £72,000 (2013: credit 
£94,000) which has been recognised in Other comprehensive income and presented in the hedging reserve in equity. 

No forward foreign currency exchange contracts have been designated as ineffective hedges in accordance with IAS 39 Financial 
Instruments: Recognition and Measurement (2013: nominal value £600,000, fair value loss £12,000, charge to income £19,000).

Commercially effective hedges may lead to income statement volatility in the future, particularly if the hedges do not meet the 
criteria of an effective hedge in accordance with IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement.

91

 
 
 
Foreign exchange rate sensitivity

The following table details how the Group’s income and equity would increase/(decrease) if there was a 10% increase in the 
amount of the respective currency which could be purchased with £1 Sterling (assuming all other variables remain constant), 
for example from $1.60:£1 to $1.76:£1 at the balance sheet date. The sensitivity analysis includes only outstanding foreign 
currency denominated monetary items and adjusts their translation at the period end for a 10% change in foreign currency. 
A 10% weakening of Sterling against the relevant currency would be estimated to have a comparable but opposite impact on 
income and equity.

Sensitivity

Group

10% increase in foreign exchange rates against Sterling:

US Dollar

Indian Rupee

Euro

2014

2013

Income 

£000 

Equity 

£000 

Income 

£000 

4 

45 

7 

525 

(117)

(41)

115 

(14)

12 

Equity 

£000 

637 

(175)

(38)

In management’s opinion, the sensitivity analysis is unrepresentative of the inherent foreign exchange risk as the period end 
exposure does not reflect the exposure during the period, as the analysis does not reflect management’s proactive monitoring 
methods and processes for exchange risk. 

Interest rate risk

The only significant interest bearing financial assets held by the Group are cash and short-term deposits which comprise 
cash held by the Group and Company and short-term bank deposits with an original maturity of six months or less. Surplus 
sterling balances are invested in the money market, or with financial institutions on maturing terms from within 24 hours up to 
a period of six months with interest earned based on the relevant national inter-bank rates available at the time of investing. 
During the year, average cash and short-term deposits were £47,460,000 (2013: £47,670,000), and the maximum bank overdraft 
was £nil (2013: £nil).

The interest and currency profile of cash and short-term deposits is shown below:

2014

2013

Group

Floating rate 

Interest free  

 £000 

£000 

Total 

£000 

Sterling cash and cash equivalents

35,633 

5,722 

41,355 

Sterling short-term deposits

6,000 

- 

6,000 

US Dollar

Euro

Indian Rupee

Singapore Dollar

- 

- 

- 

- 

126 

72 

289 

51 

126 

72 

289 

51 

Floating rate 

Interest free 

£000 

54,229 

6,000 

- 

- 

195 

- 

£000 

1,984 

- 

474 

120 

143 

24 

Total 

£000 

56,213 

6,000 

474 

120 

338 

24 

41,633 

6,260 

47,893 

60,424 

2,745 

63,169 

The Group has a £30,000,000 committed Barclays revolving credit facility signed on 27 January 2012, £3,000,000 of which 
is allocated to an on demand working capital facility and £600,000 allocated to a performance bond facility, leaving 
£26,400,000 unallocated. 

Interest payable on any utilised revolving credit facility is fixed 2.5% above LIBOR for the remainder of the 3 year committed 
term subject to certain financial ratios. A commitment fee of 1.2% is payable on the unutilised balance and an arrangement 
fee of £75,000 (2013: £75,000) has been paid in 2014 and is recognised in the Consolidated Income Statement on an effective 
interest rate basis over the duration of the facility. The total paid since the inception of the facility is £550,000.

9292

The weighted average effective interest rates at the balance sheet date were as follows:

2014

2013

 Weighted 

average interest 

 Weighted average 

Floating rate 

£000 

rate 

%

Floating rate 

interest rate 

£000 

%

Group

Financial assets:

Cash and short-term deposits

Trade and other receivables (non-current)

41,633

1,878

0.55

10.39

63,169

1,911

0.55

10.41

The interest rate risk sensitivity (assuming all other variables remain constant) is as follows:

Group

1% increase in interest rates

1% decrease in interest rates

Credit risk

2014

2013

Income 

Equity 

sensitivity 

sensitivity 

Income 

sensitivity 

Equity 

sensitivity 

£000 

437 

(437)

£000 

437 

(437)

£000 

419 

(419)

£000 

419 

(419)

The Group’s principal financial assets are bank balances and trade and other receivables. The Group’s credit risk is primarily 
attributable to its trade receivables. Credit checks are performed on new customers and before credit limits are increased. The 
amounts presented in the balance sheet are net of allowances for doubtful receivables. Note 18 includes an analysis of trade 
receivables by type of customer and of the ageing of unimpaired trade receivables. 

The credit risk on liquid funds and derivative financial instruments is limited because the counterparties are banks with high 
credit-ratings assigned by international credit-rating agencies. The Group has no significant concentration of credit risk, 
with exposure spread over a large number of counterparties and customers and a large proportion are ultimately backed by 
the UK Government.

The carrying amount of financial assets represents the maximum credit exposure. The Group does not hold any collateral to 
cover its risks associated with financial assets.

Liquidity risk

Cash is managed to ensure that sufficient liquid funds are available with a variety of counterparties, to meet short, medium 
and long-term cash flow forecasting requirements.

The Group meets its seasonal working capital requirements from current funds. At the balance sheet date, the Group had a 
£30,000,000 three year committed revolving credit facility to March 2017 held with Barclays Bank, of which £3,600,000 has been 
allocated. The unallocated facilities at the end of the year were £26,400,000 of working capital funding capacity at the end of 
the year. At 30 November 2014 £300,000 of the performance bond facility was drawn down (2013: £570,000).

93

Capital management

The Group monitors capital through the calculation and review of economic profit. A monthly working capital charge on Group 
operating assets (excluding primarily goodwill, cash, provisions treated as adjustments and tax balances) or credit on Group 
operating liabilities is applied to the Group adjusted operating profit to provide economic profit, as follows:

Adjusted profit from operations

Capital return on operating liabilities

Economic profit

29. Related party transactions
Key management personnel   

Year ended 
30 November 2014 

Year ended 
30 November 2013 

£000

18,526

2,295 

20,821

£000

17,209

1,831 

19,040 

The remuneration of the Directors and other key management personnel of the Group during the year, in aggregate, was: 

Company

Short-term employee benefits

Post-employment benefits

Termination payments

Share-based payment

Year ended 
30 November 2014 

Year ended 
30 November 2013 

£000

3,065 

285 

169 

578 

£000

2,855 

327 

- 

281 

Share-based payments above include a fair value charge for executive Directors of £136,000 in respect of awards to 
David Brooks (2013: £89,000) and £104,000 in respect of Iain McIntosh (2013: £75,000).

Further information about the remuneration of individual Directors is provided in the audited part of the 
Remuneration Report. 

Transactions between the Company and its subsidiary undertakings 

During the year, the Company entered into the following transactions with its subsidiary undertakings: 

Company

Receipts/(payments)

Management recharges

Net inter-company interest income

Dividends received

Year ended 
30 November 2014 

Year ended 
30 November 2013 

£000

£000

(447)

37 

8,000 

(348)

122 

6,200 

Total amounts owed between the Company and its subsidiary undertakings are disclosed in notes 18 and 20 respectively.

Other related party transactions

TES Global Limited

RM plc Board Director Lord Andrew Adonis is a member of the Advisory Board of TES Global Limited (formerly TSL Education 
Limited), from which the Group made purchases of £5,512 (2013: £26,094) and to which the Group made sales of £1,778 during 
the year (2013: £nil).

9494

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dods (Group) plc

RM plc Board Director Lord Andrew Adonis is a director of Dods (Group) plc from which the Group made purchases of £474 
during the year.

Ofcom

Jo Connell, who was an RM plc Board Director until 19 March 2014, is the Chair of the Advisory Committee for Older and 
Disabled People within Ofcom, from which the Group made purchases of £8,550 during the year (2013: £8,330). 

Wates Group Limited

RM plc Board Director Deena Mattar is a director of Wates Group Limited, to which no sales were made by the Group during the 
year (2013: £70,000) but there was a retention balance owing to the Group of £2,106 at 30 November 2014.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

The Group uses PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to provide certain consultancy and assurance services, but excluding external audit 
services. RM Board Director Iain McIntosh’s wife is an equity partner in PricewaterhouseCoopers. She has not been involved in any 
services provided to the Group. The Group made purchases from PricewaterhouseCoopers for the year ended 30 November 2014 
of £255,350 (2013: £27,800) and the balance outstanding at 30 November 2014 was £nil (30 November 2013: £26,160). 

The Group encourages its Directors and employees to be Governors, Trustees or equivalent of educational establishments. 
The Group trades with these establishments in the normal course of its business.

30. Events after the reporting period
On 2 December 2014, after the balance sheet date, the awards granted in December 2011 and February 2012 under the RM plc 
Performance Share Plan 2010 vested to participants, with 2,146,000 shares vesting. Details of Performance Share Plan awards 
can be found in note 25 b).

The Group’s obligations under the awards were satisfied with shares held by the RM plc Employee Share Trust (see note 24 for 
details of Trust holdings at 30 November 2014).

Following vesting of the awards, the RM plc Employee Share Trust repurchased 1,438,000 shares from participants at a cash 
cost of £2,293,000, being the market value of the shares at the close of business on 1 December 2014. The repurchase was 
made via agreement with participants made before 30 November 2014, taking into account participants’ wishes to retain or 
realise vesting shares (particularly in order to cover individual tax liabilities arising).

This transaction is not an adjusting post balance sheet event and will be recorded in the Financial Statements for the year 
ending 30 November 2015.

95

Shareholder 
Information

Financial calendar 
Ex-dividend date for 2014 final dividend

Record date for 2014 final dividend

Annual General Meeting

Payment of 2014 final dividend

Announcement of 2015 interim results

Preliminary announcement of 2015 results

12 March 2015

13 March 2015

25 March 2015

10 April 2015

July 2015

February 2016

Corporate website
Information about the Group’s activities is available from RM at www.rmplc.com.

96

Investor information
Information for investors is available at 
www.rmplc.com. Enquiries can be directed to 
Greg Davidson, Company Secretary, at the 
Group head office address or at 
companysecretary@rm.com.

Registrars and 
shareholding information
Shareholders can access the details of their holdings 
in RM plc via the Shareholder Services option within 
the investor section of the corporate website at 
www.rmplc.com. Shareholders can also make changes 
to their address details and dividend mandates 
online. All enquiries about individual shareholder 
matters should be made to the registrar either via 
email at shareholderenquiries@capita.co.uk or 
telephone: 0871 664 0300 (calls cost 10p per minute 
plus network extras; lines are open 8.30am to 5.30pm, 
Monday to Friday). To help shareholders, the Capita 
website at www.capitaassetservices.com contains a 
shareholders’ frequently asked questions section.

Electronic communication
Shareholders are able to receive Company 
communication via email. By registering your email 
address, you will receive emails with a web link to 
information posted on our website. This can include our 
report and financial statements, notice of meetings and 
other information we communicate to our shareholders.

Electronic communication brings numerous benefits, 
which include helping us reduce our impact on the 
environment, increased security (your documents cannot 
be lost in the post or read by others), faster notification 
of information and updates, easy access (you can check 
your shareholding and account transactions online at 
any time) and convenience (you can change your name, 
address or dividend mandate details online). To sign-up 
to receive e-communications go to Capita Asset Services’ 
Share Portal at www.capitashareportal.com.

Beneficial shareholders with 
‘information rights’
Please note that beneficial owners of shares who have 
been nominated by the registered holders of those 
shares to receive information rights under section 146 
of the Companies Act 2006 are required to direct all 
communications to the registered holder of their 
shares rather than to Capita Asset Services, or to the 
Company directly.

Multiple accounts on 
the shareholder register
If you have received two or more copies of this document, 
it may be because there is more than one account in 
your name on the shareholder register. This may be 
due to either your name or address appearing on each 
account in a slightly different way. For security reasons, 
Capita will not amalgamate the accounts without your 
written consent. If you would like to amalgamate your 
multiple accounts into one account, please write to 
Capita Asset Services.

Company Secretary
Greg Davidson

Group head office 
and registered office
140 Eastern Avenue 
Milton Park 
Milton 
Abingdon 
Oxfordshire OX14 4SB 
United Kingdom

Telephone: +44 (0)8450 700 300

Registered number
RM plc’s registered number is 01749877.

Auditor
KPMG LLP 
Arlington Business Park 
Theale 
Reading RG7 4SD

Financial Adviser and Stockbroker
Numis Securities Ltd 
10 Paternoster Square 
London EC4M 7LT

Financial Public Relations
FTI Consulting Ltd 
200 Aldersgate 
Aldersgate Street 
London EC1A 4HD

Registrar
Capita Asset Services 
The Registry 
34 Beckenham Road 
Beckenham 
Kent BR3 4TU

Legal Adviser
Osborne Clarke 
One London Wall 
London EC2Y 5EB

97

RM plc
140 Eastern Avenue 
Milton Park 
Milton 
Abingdon 
Oxfordshire 
OX14 4SB

Telephone: +44 (0)8450 700 300 
Fax: +44 (0)8450 700 400

Stock code: RM.

www.rmplc.com

R

M

p

l

c

A

n

n

u

a

l

R

e

p

o

r

t

a

n

d

F

i

n

a

n

c

i

a

l

S

t

a

t

e

m

e

n

t

s

–

Y

e

a

r

e

n

d

e

d

3

0

N

o

v

e

m

b

e

r

2

0

1

4