2018 ANNUAL REPORT
DEAR RYERSON SHAREHOLDERS:
This is my fourth shareholder letter since I became President & CEO of Ryerson in June
of 2015 and while I can’t say if this will be my best shareholder letter, I can tell you this
letter will be about our best performance in more than a decade and that our path
forward is bright. As it has been said and sung, “To everything (turn, turn, turn), there is
a season (turn, turn, turn),” and although that happens to be our perpetual inventory
anthem, it also happens to underscore a place of arrival: the beginning of a season to
turn down our leverage and strengthen our balance sheet from a position of operational
and earnings strength. It is a point of embarkment as we begin a journey in earnest to
reduce our debt and affect a desired enterprise value shift from debt to equity over the
next several years. Because of the outstanding work done by my Ryerson teammates
in 2018, which further built upon the work done over the past decade, we believe our
transformation has reached a significant tipping point where we have a sustainable
business model that can deliver profitability and improved cash flows to move us
beyond incrementally better financial oscillations to much more meaningful strides in
growing shareholder value through the business cycle.
But first, a quick retrospective as we did not arrive here by accident. By way of recent
history, in our 2015 and 2016 Shareholder Letters we discussed a culture change and
ongoing business model transformation amidst the most trying industry conditions since
2009. During 2015 and 2016, our industry lost approximately 30% of its revenue from
both price deflation and volume declines, primarily due to a significant economic
slowdown in China and a drop in oil prices from more than $100 per barrel to less than
$40 per barrel. During this period, Ryerson kept moving forward despite the harsh
business conditions marked by extreme commodity volatility and recessed demand. In
fact, during that time we generated significant countercyclical cash flows, refinanced our
debt and sold equity to further reduce leverage. We further raised performance
baselines with higher gross margins, excluding LIFO, and improved expense
management and asset efficiency.
In 2017, the industry began clawing back volume and attained some measure of price
recovery. Ryerson recognized opportunities to grow as we completed two value-added
acquisitions that enhanced our processing capabilities, and we continued to make
investments in our systems to create great customer experiences through our network
of intelligent service centers. During 2017, margins were challenged as imports in key
products, such as common alloy aluminum, surged. Prices of imported steels and
aluminum products exerted significant downward pressure on domestic prices for
carbon steel, stainless steel, and aluminum products which served to dampen gross
margins relative to 2016 and 2018.
Ryerson combatted the margin pressure experienced in 2017 by maintaining good
expense discipline and asset efficiency. We did more work “under the hood” of our
company in continuing to build tools and enablers such as our “virtual warehouse” that
maps inside-of-Ryerson and outside-of-Ryerson supply chains across the industrial
metals landscape for rapid quoting and faster customer solution generation. By
improving speed to market through our omni-channel “go to market” strategy, we
provided our customers greater access to our products, services and value-added
capabilities in areas such as high-quality stainless steel polishing and value-added
fabrication. We continued planting seeds throughout the year with a high degree of
confidence that such planting would make for a better harvest.
In 2018, we put it all together and then some. We had our best year in more than a
decade and put a marker down on how Ryerson’s potential should be viewed as we
move into the future. In short, we grew the business profitably both organically and
inorganically. We expanded gross margins, excluding LIFO. We generated expense
leverage. We managed assets efficiently, and the quality of our assets improved. We
moved solidly into positive net book value territory for the first time in nine years, and we
improved our capital structure and lowered our cash interest burden while further de-
risking our legacy liabilities. But here is the best part: we’re still in the early innings of
the opportunities we see before us as we build a better and stronger Ryerson. While
2018 was marked by a shift in global trade policies and movement of materials, the
underlying and sustaining thesis for value-added processing and distribution of
industrial metals remains intact. Even when the global economy delivers periodic
upsets, the prevailing needs of society still apply, and that is a world that needs
investment in long-life assets and infrastructure that drives the real engine of economic
growth that is greater productivity. The industrial metals that Ryerson processes and
distributes are at the epicenter of that investment and productivity. The opportunities
within our industry are abundant despite intervals of economic volatility. It is important
to keep this in mind as the need eventually comes due and cannot be further displaced.
What we are building at Ryerson, piece by piece, effort by effort, and result by result
isn’t without a slip on the proverbial “banana peel” now and again. But taken in its
entirety since 2007, ask yourself a question based upon the chart included below: which
company do you like better, Ryerson circa 2007 or Ryerson circa 2018? Ask yourself
another question: which way was the energy and momentum going in 2007 versus
2018? History and results will tell the tale, but I’ll give you my take. Our organizational
energy is vibrant and purposeful. Our momentum is decidedly positive, and our
business model is right for the times in which we compete. In 2018, we made notable
acquisitions of Fanello Industries and Central Steel & Wire Company. These
acquisitions were strategic bullseyes in value-added processing and synergistic product
mix additions. We also made investments in digitalization, omni-channel sales,
automation, and differentiated equipment for enhanced metals fabrication.
Gross Margin, excl. LIFO
& purchase accounting
Adj. EBITDA, excl.
LIFO Margin
Cash Conversion
Cycle
U.S. Industry
Shipments
Bloomberg
Commodity Index
2007
14.6%
3.6%
106 days
2007
61M
182
2018
19.4%
7.0%
75 days
2018
42M
77
Change
4.8%
3.4%
31 days
Change
31%
58%
U.S. shipments source: The Metals Service Center Institute
Reconciliations of gross margin, excluding LIFO and purchase accounting adjustments to gross margin
and of Adjusted EBITDA, excluding LIFO to net income attributable to Ryerson Holding Corporation are
included within our Form 8-K filing filed on March 5, 2019.
As we continue investing in our culture, our people, our tools, our enablers, and the
customer experience, we think of Vince Lombardi’s famous quote applied to a team,
“Perfection is not attainable, but if we chase perfection, we can catch excellence.” As
an organization Ryerson can “chase perfection and catch excellence” as a collective
group made up of shared talent, mission, and purpose. We can create great customer
experiences profitably time-after-time with ever improving consistency. We can build
our vision of mapping the industrial metals genome and bring our customers the
solutions they want and need at speed, scale, completeness, and cost competitiveness.
2018 is now in the books and we have much more to do as we move into 2019. But we
cannot let 2018 go without thanking our customers for the opportunity to be part of their
success. I thank my Ryerson colleagues for embracing the challenges and
opportunities inherent in building exceptional companies and making an important
delivery on that promise in 2018. And I thank our shareholders for their continued
support of Ryerson’s progress towards significant shareholder value accretion.
Ryerson’s North American Interconnected Network
Local Presence, National Scale
Over 100 locations
across North
America and China
Next day delivery
24/7 customer service
on Ryerson.com
77
Value-Added Processing
Sales product mix based on Q3 2018 10-Q results;
Carbon includes other metal sales representing 2%
of sales mix.
7
As we move into 2019, our mission is to unite the themes expressed at the beginning of
this letter with the themes expressed at the end of last year’s letter. In November 2017,
we rang the bell on the NYSE in celebration of Ryerson’s 175th year in business. That
bell ringing symbolized the promise of our future while honoring all the years of our past.
It sounded the call to be better in ways that endure and sustain. It also gave us a
measure of place and time, a measure of the season and realization of what actions to
take and in what sequence. And so, to every season we take a turn, and that turn in
2019 is to reduce leverage and strengthen our balance sheet. In 2017 and 2018 we
planted seeds and cultivated growth. And though we will not turn our backs to good
growth prospects, we will take a turn in 2019 to focus on debt reduction, increased free
cash flow, and lowering Ryerson’s weighted average cost of debt capital. It is important
to understand the place and time we are in and the sequence of actions that will
advance our cause in the most desirable way. That sequence of actions is to execute
our business plan exceedingly well in 2019 and follow up an excellent year with another
excellent year. With the milestones achieved in 2018, we have an opportunity in 2019
to rebalance how Ryerson has been valued by paying down debt and seeing that debt
reduction morph to the equity side of the equation.
We hear the bell tones, we understand our place and time, and we know the actions to
take and the season in which to take them. With our culture, our collective abilities, the
right business model and execution of that model - the market, the money, and the math
will prove out and we should see Ryerson’s value continue to grow. I already look
forward to next year’s shareholder letter with great anticipation in sharing with you a
letter founded, most importantly, upon another excellent year.
With Great Optimism,
Edward J. Lehner
President and Chief Executive Officer
March 13, 2019
Section 1: 10-K (10-K)
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018
OR
☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission File No. 001-34735
RYERSON HOLDING CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
26-1251524
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
227 W. Monroe St., 27th Floor
Chicago, Illinois 60606
(Address of principal executive offices)
(312) 292-5000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
Common Stock - $0.01 par value
Name of exchange on which registered
New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T
(§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K(§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to
the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-
K. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or emerging growth
company. See the definitions of “ large accelerated filer,” “ accelerated filer,” “ smaller reporting company,” and “ emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act.
Large accelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer
☐
☐
Accelerated filer
Smaller reporting company
Emerging growth company
☒
☐
☐
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial
accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant, based on the closing price of a share of the registrant’s
common stock on June 30, 2018 as reported by the New York Stock Exchange on such date was approximately $175,719,730. Shares of the registrant’s common stock held by
each executive officer, director and holder of 5% or more of the outstanding common stock have been excluded in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This
calculation does not reflect a determination that certain persons are affiliates of the registrant for any other purpose.
Yes ☐ No ☐
As of February 28, 2019 there were 37,453,080 shares of our Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
The information required to be furnished pursuant to Part III of this Form 10-K will be set forth in, and incorporated by reference from, the registrant’s definitive proxy
statement for the annual meeting of stockholders (the “ 2018 Proxy Statement”), which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after
the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
PART I
Item 1.
Business
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
Item 1B.
Unresolved Staff Comments
Item 2.
Properties
Item 3.
Legal Proceedings
Item 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures
PART II
Item 5.
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Item 6.
Selected Financial Data
Item 7.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Item 9.
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Item 9A.
Controls and Procedures
Item 9B.
Other Information
PART III
Item 10.
Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance
Item 11.
Executive Compensation
Item 12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Item 13.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Item 14.
Principal Accounting Fees and Services
PART IV
Item 15.
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
Signatures
2
Page
3
4
11
21
22
24
24
25
26
29
46
48
99
99
99
100
100
100
101
101
102
106
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report contains “forward-looking statements.” Such statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as
“objectives,” “goals,” “preliminary,” “range,” “believes,” “expects,” “may,” “estimates,” “will,” “should,” “plans” or “anticipates” or the negative
thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology, or by discussions of strategy. Readers are cautioned that any such forward-looking
statements are not guarantees of future performance and may involve significant risks and uncertainties, and that actual results may vary materially from
those anticipated or implied in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors. Among the factors that significantly impact the metals
distribution industry and our business are:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
highly cyclical fluctuations resulting from, among others, seasonality, market uncertainty, and costs of goods sold;
remaining competitive and maintaining market share in the highly competitive and fragmented metals distribution industry;
managing the costs of purchased metals relative to the price at which we sell our products during periods of rapid price escalation;
our substantial indebtedness and the covenants in instruments governing such indebtedness;
the impairment of goodwill that could result from, among other things, volatility in the markets in which we operate;
the failure to effectively integrate newly acquired operations;
the regulatory and other operational risks associated with our operations located outside of the United States (or “U.S.”);
the management of inventory and other costs and expenses;
the adequacy of our efforts to mitigate cyber security risks and threats;
reduced production schedules, layoffs or work stoppages by our own, our suppliers’, or customers’ personnel;
certain employee retirement benefit plans are underfunded and the actual costs could exceed current estimates;
future funding for postretirement employee benefits may require substantial payments from current cash flow;
prolonged disruption of our processing centers;
the ability to retain and attract management and key personnel;
the ability of management to focus on North American and foreign operations;
the ability to comply with the terms of our asset-based credit facility and our indenture;
the incurrence of substantial costs or liabilities to comply with, or as a result of violations of, environmental laws;
the impact of new or pending litigation against us;
the risk of product liability claims;
our risk management strategies may result in losses;
currency fluctuations in the U.S. dollar versus the Canadian dollar and the Chinese renminbi;
customer, supplier, and competitor consolidation, bankruptcy or insolvency;
the ownership of a majority of our equity securities by a single investor group.
These risks and uncertainties could cause actual results to differ materially from those suggested by the forward-looking statements. Forward-
looking statements should, therefore, be considered in light of various factors, including those set forth in this Annual Report under “Risk Factors” and
the caption “Industry and Operating Trends” included in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”
and elsewhere in this Annual Report. Moreover, we caution you not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of
the date they were made. We do not undertake any obligation to revise or publicly release any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect
events or circumstances after the date of this Annual Report or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
3
ITEM 1.
BUSINESS.
PART I
Ryerson Holding Corporation (“Ryerson Holding”), a Delaware corporation, is the parent company of Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc. (“JT
Ryerson”), a Delaware corporation. Affiliates of Platinum Equity, LLC (“Platinum”) own approximately 21,037,500 shares of our common stock, which is
approximately 56% of our issued and outstanding common stock.
We are a leading metals service center, a value-added processor and distributor of industrial metals with operations in the United States through
JT Ryerson, in Canada through our indirect wholly-owned subsidiary Ryerson Canada, Inc., a Canadian corporation (“Ryerson Canada”), and in Mexico
through our indirect wholly-owned subsidiary Ryerson Metals de Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V., a Mexican corporation (“Ryerson Mexico”). In addition to
our North American operations, we conduct materials processing and distribution operations in China through an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary,
Ryerson China Limited (“Ryerson China”). Unless the context indicates otherwise, Ryerson Holding, JT Ryerson, Ryerson Canada, Ryerson China, and
Ryerson Mexico together with their subsidiaries, are collectively referred to herein as “Ryerson,” “we,” “us,” “our,” or the “Company.”
Our Company
We believe we are one of the largest value-add processors and distributors of industrial metals in North America measured in terms of sales. Our
industry is highly fragmented with the largest companies accounting for only a small percentage of total market share. Our customer base ranges from
local, independently owned fabricators and machine shops to large, international original equipment manufacturers. We carry a full line of over 75,000
products in stainless steel, aluminum, carbon steel, and alloy steels and a limited line of nickel and red metals in various shapes and forms. More than
75% of the products we sell are processed to meet customer requirements. Specifically, we provide a wide range of flat and long metals products, we offer
numerous value-added processing and fabrication services such as bending, beveling, blanking, blasting, burning, cutting-to-length, drilling, embossing,
flattening, forming, grinding, laser cutting, machining, notching, painting, perforating, polishing, punching, rolling, sawing, scribing, shearing, slitting,
stamping, tapping, threading, welding, or other techniques to process materials to a specified thickness, length, width, shape, and surface quality
pursuant to specific customer orders. Our value proposition also includes providing a superior level of customer service and responsiveness, technical
services, and inventory management solutions. Our range of products together with our breadth of services allows us to create long-term partnerships
with our customers and enhances our profitability. We continue to focus on our systems and enhance our online services to provide increased
functionality and flexibility to our customers.
We track the processing, if any, performed on sold material for over 95% of our total revenues. The activities we track broadly fall into four main
processing categories: (1) sheet processing (excludes fabrication activities), (2) as-is long and plate, (3) cut long and plate, and (4) fabrication. A key
metric that we track is the percentage mix of revenue that comes from our fabrication capabilities. In 2010, the mix of revenue from fabrication activities
was 6.7% of our sales, while in 2018, our mix of revenue from fabrication activities was 10.2% of our sales largely due to the strategic investments we have
made in value-added processing capital expenditures. On July 2, 2018, JT Ryerson acquired Central Steel and Wire Company (“CS&W”) a leading metal
service center with locations across the Central and Eastern United States offering a wide selection of products and capabilities, with a commercial
portfolio centered on bar, tube, plate, and steel products.
We operate 97 facilities across North America and five facilities in China. Our service centers are strategically located near our customers, which
allows us to quickly process and deliver our products and services, often within the next day of receiving an order. We own, lease, or contract a fleet of
tractors and trailers, allowing us to efficiently meet our customers’ delivery demands. In addition, our scale enables us to maintain low operating costs.
Our operating expenses as a percentage of sales for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 were 14.0% and 14.3%, respectively.
We serve approximately 45,000 customers across a wide range of manufacturing end markets. Our geographic network and broad range of
products and services allow us to serve large, international manufacturing companies across multiple locations. We believe the diverse end markets we
serve reduce the volatility of our business in the aggregate.
Industry Overview
Metals service centers serve as key intermediaries between metal producers and end users of metal products. Metal producers offer commodity
products and typically sell metals in the form of standard-sized coils, sheets, plates, structurals, bars, and tubes. Producers, mostly steel and aluminum
mills, prefer large order quantities, longer lead times, and limited inventory to maximize capacity utilization across their typically higher capital-intensive
structure.
4
End users of metal products seek to purchase metals with customized specifications, including value-added processing. End-users in highly
diverse industries such as machinery, construction, and transportation often look for “one-stop” suppliers that can offer processing services along with
lower order volumes, shorter lead times, and more reliable delivery.
As an intermediary, metals service centers aggregate end-users’ demand, purchase metal in bulk to take advantage of economies of scale, and
then process and sell metal that meets specific customer requirements.
The metals service center industry is comprised of many companies, the majority of which have limited product lines and inventories, with
customers located in a specific geographic area. In general, competition is based on quality, service, price, and geographic proximity.
The metals service center industry typically experiences cash flow trends that are counter-cyclical to the revenue and volume growth of the
industry. During an industry downturn, companies generally reduce working capital assets and generate cash as inventory and accounts receivable
balances decline. As a result, operating cash flow and liquidity tend to increase during a downturn, which typically facilitates industry participants’
ability to cover fixed costs and repay outstanding debt.
We compete with many other metals service centers and to a lesser extent with primary metal producers. Primary metal producers typically sell to
larger customers that require regular shipments of higher volumes of steel than the traditional service center customer.
Competitive Strengths
Leading Market Position in North America.
Based on sales, we believe we are one of the largest service center companies for carbon, stainless steel, and aluminum in the North American
market where we have a broad geographic presence with 97 facilities.
Our service centers are located near our customer locations, enabling us to provide timely delivery to customers across numerous geographic
markets. Additionally, our widespread network of locations in the United States, Canada, and Mexico helps us to utilize our expertise to more efficiently
serve customers with complex supply chain requirements across multiple manufacturing locations. We believe this is a key differentiator for customers
who need a supplier that can reliably and consistently support them. Our ability to transfer inventory among our facilities better enables us to more timely
and profitably source and process specialized items at regional locations throughout our network than if we were required to maintain inventory of all
products and specialized equipment at each location.
Broad Geographic Reach Across Attractive End Markets.
Our operations serve a diverse range of industries including commercial ground transportation manufacturing, metal fabrication and machine
shops, industrial machinery and equipment manufacturing, consumer durable equipment, HVAC manufacturing, construction equipment manufacturing,
food processing and agricultural equipment manufacturing, and oil and gas. We believe this broad range of industries in which we sell our products and
services reduces our risk related to a downturn in a specific industry. We believe that our ability to quickly adjust our offering based on regional and
industry specific trends creates stability while also providing the opportunity to access specific growth markets.
Established Platform for Organic and Acquisition Growth.
Although there can be no guarantee of growth, we believe a number of our strategies, such as investing in value-added processing capabilities,
analytically targeting attractive customers and end markets with our supply chain optimization service model, industry consolidation through targeted
M&A, and providing customers faster and easier solutions to their metal needs will provide us with growth opportunities.
Given the highly fragmented nature of the metals service center industry, we believe there are numerous additional opportunities to acquire
businesses and incorporate them into our existing infrastructure. Given our large scale and geographic reach, we believe we can add value to these
businesses in a number of ways, including providing greater purchasing power, improving expense and working capital management, access to additional
end markets, and broadening product mix.
5
Lean Operating Structure Providing Operating Leverage.
Ryerson has demonstrated the ability to effectively manage expenses through tactical productivity and spending improvements. In a stronger
metals service center environment characterized by increases in demand and/or pricing, we believe that most additional expenses to service higher
revenue and margins would come from variable expenses while further leveraging economies of scale on our existing fixed expenses. We effectively
managed our costs in 2018 with increased volume and cost inflation, as expenses as a percentage of sales declined from 14.3% in 2017 to 14.0% in 2018.
We also continue to focus on inventory management. Average inventory days excluding LIFO increased from 71 days in 2017 to 73 days in 2018.
This increase is due to the acquisition of CS&W in July 2018. On a same-store basis, days of supply remained at 71 days, within management’s target
range of 70 to 75 days. As a result of our initiatives, we maintain financial flexibility and believe we have a favorable cost structure compared to many of
our peers.
Extensive Breadth of Products and Services for Diverse Customer Base.
We believe our broad product mix and marketing approach provides customers with a “one-stop shop” solution few other metals service center
companies are able to offer. We provide a broad range of processing and fabrication services to meet the needs of our approximately 45,000 customers
and typically fulfill more than 1,500,000 orders per year. We provide supply chain solutions, including just-in-time delivery and value-added processing
to many original equipment manufacturing customers.
For the year ended December 31, 2018, no single customer, including their subcontractors, accounted for more than 6% of our sales, and our top
10 customers, including their subcontractors accounted for less than 15% of our sales.
Strong Relationships with Suppliers.
We are among the largest purchasers of metals in North America and have long-term relationships with many of our North American suppliers.
We believe we are frequently one of the largest customers of our suppliers and that concentrating our orders among a core group of suppliers is effective
for obtaining favorable pricing and service. We believe we have the opportunity to further leverage this strength through continued focus on price and
volume using an analytics-driven approach to procurement. In addition, we view our strategic suppliers as supply chain partners. We focus on logistics,
lead times, rolling schedules, and scrap return programs to drive value-based buying that is advantageous for us. Metals producers worldwide are
consolidating, and large, geographically diversified customers, such as Ryerson, are desirable partners for these larger suppliers. Our relationships with
suppliers often provide us with access to metals when supply is constrained. Through our knowledge of the global metals marketplace and capabilities of
specific mills we believe we have developed an advantageous global purchasing strategy.
Experienced Management Team with Deep Industry Knowledge.
Our senior management team has extensive industry and operational experience and has been instrumental in optimizing and implementing our
strategy over the last five years. Our senior management has an average of more than 20 years of experience in the metals or service center industries.
Our CEO, Mr. Edward Lehner, who joined the Company in August 2012 as CFO and became CEO in June 2015, has nearly 30 years of experience,
predominantly in the metals industry. Mr. Erich Schnaufer, who joined the Company in 2005 and became CFO in January 2016, has nearly 30 years of
financial and accounting experience and over 10 years with Ryerson.
Industry Outlook
The United States economy has grown since the recession of 2008. According to the Institute for Supply Management, the Purchasing Managers’
Index (“PMI”) was above 50% for 33 of the last 36 months, indicating general expansion in the U.S. manufacturing economy for the last three years. The
PMI measures the economic health of the manufacturing sector and is a composite index based on five indicators: new orders, inventory levels,
production, supplier deliveries, and the employment environment. PMI readings can be a good indicator of industrial activity and general economic
growth.
Additionally, the overall U.S. economy is projected to maintain growth as evidenced by the Federal Reserve’s midrange forecasted real GDP
growth rates of 2.5%, 2.0%, and 1.8% for 2019, 2020, and 2021, respectively.
Steel demand in North America is largely dependent on growth of the automotive, industrial equipment, consumer appliance, and construction end
markets. One of our key end markets is the industrial equipment sector, and according to the latest Livingston Survey, published by the Federal Reserve
Bank of Philadelphia, U.S. industrial production expanded by 3.8% in 2018 and is expected to grow by 2.9% in 2019, and 2.0% in 2020.
6
China continues to be a key driver in the growth of global metals demand. According to the International Monetary Fund, China’s GDP maintained
growth of 6.6% in 2018 and is projected to grow 6.2% in 2019, and 6.2% in 2020.
Products and Services
We carry a full line of carbon steel, stainless steel, alloy steels, and aluminum, and a limited line of nickel and red metals. These materials are
stocked in a number of shapes, including coils, sheets, rounds, hexagons, square and flat bars, plates, structurals, and tubing.
The following table shows our percentage of sales by major product lines for 2018, 2017, and 2016:
Product Line
Carbon Steel Flat
Carbon Steel Plate
Carbon Steel Long
Stainless Steel Flat
Stainless Steel Plate
Stainless Steel Long
Aluminum Flat
Aluminum Plate
Aluminum Long
Other
Total
2018
2017
2016
27 %
11
14
16
4
4
15
3
4
2
100 %
28 %
10
12
18
4
4
15
3
4
2
100 %
28 %
9
13
17
4
3
16
3
5
2
100 %
More than 75% of the materials sold by us are processed. We use processing and fabricating techniques such as bending, beveling, blanking,
blasting, burning, cutting-to-length, drilling, embossing, flattening, forming, grinding, laser cutting, machining, notching, painting, perforating, polishing,
punching, rolling, sawing, scribing, shearing, slitting, stamping, tapping, threading, welding, or other techniques to process materials to specified
thickness, length, width, shape, and surface quality pursuant to specific customer orders. Among the most common processing techniques used by us
are slitting, which involves cutting coiled metals to specified widths along the length of the coil, and leveling, which involves flattening coiled metals and
cutting them to exact lengths. We also use third-party fabricators to outsource certain processes (such as pickling and other coating processes or heat
treating).
The plate burning and fabrication processes are particularly important to us. These processes require sophisticated and expensive processing
equipment. As a result, rather than making investments in such equipment, manufacturers have increasingly outsourced these processes to metals
service centers.
As part of securing customer orders, we also provide services to our customers to assure cost effective material application while maintaining or
improving the customers’ product quality. Among our services are: just-in-time inventory programs, production of configured kits containing multiple
custom products for ease of assembly by the customer, consignment arrangements, and the placement of our employees at a customer’s site for
inventory management and production and technical assistance. We also provide special stocking programs in which products that would not otherwise
be stocked by us are held in inventory to meet certain customers’ needs. These services are designed to reduce customers’ costs by minimizing their
investment in inventory and processing equipment and improving their production efficiency.
7
Customers
Our customer base is diverse, numbering approximately 45,000 and including most metal-consuming industries, most of which are cyclical. For the
year ended December 31, 2018, no customer, including their subcontractors, accounted for more than 6 percent of our sales, and the top 10 customers,
including their subcontractors, accounted for less than 15 percent of our sales. Substantially all of our sales are attributable to our U.S. operations and
substantially all of our long-lived assets are located in the United States. The following table shows the Company’s percentage of sales by metal
consuming industry for 2018, 2017, and 2016:
Metal Consuming Industry
Metal fabrication and machine shops
Industrial machinery and equipment
Commercial ground transportation
Consumer durable
Food processing and agricultural equipment
Construction equipment
HVAC
Oil & gas
Other
Total
2018
Percentage of Sales
2017
2016
22 %
18
16
11
10
8
6
5
4
100 %
20 %
18
16
11
10
9
7
5
4
100 %
18 %
18
16
11
9
9
7
5
7
100 %
Some of our largest customers have procurement programs with us, typically ranging from three months to one year in duration. Pricing for these
contracts is generally based on a pricing formula rather than a fixed price for the program duration. However, certain customer contracts are at fixed
prices; to minimize our financial exposure, we generally match these fixed-price sales programs with fixed-price supply programs. In general, sales to
customers are priced at the time of sale based on prevailing market prices.
Suppliers
For the year ended December 31, 2018, our top 25 suppliers, including their subcontractors, accounted for approximately 74% of our purchase
dollars. We purchase the majority of our inventories at prevailing market prices from key suppliers with which we have established relationships to obtain
improvements in price, quality, delivery, and service. We are generally able to meet our materials requirements because we use many suppliers, there is a
substantial overlap of product offerings from these suppliers, and there are several other suppliers able to provide identical or similar products. Because
of the competitive nature of the business, when metal prices increase due to product demand, mill surcharges, input costs, supplier consolidation, or
other factors that in turn lead to supply constraints or longer mill lead times and higher procured material costs, we may not be able to fully pass
increased material costs to customers. In recent decades, there have been significant consolidations among suppliers of carbon steel, stainless steel, and
aluminum. We believe we will be able to meet our material requirements and believe we will continue to be among the largest customers of our suppliers.
Sales and Marketing
We maintain our own professional sales force. In addition to our office sales staff, we market and sell our products through the use of our field
sales force that we believe has extensive product and customer knowledge and offers a comprehensive catalog of our products. Our office and field sales
staffs, which together consist of approximately 790 employees, include technical personnel.
A portion of our customers experience seasonal slowdowns. Our sales, as measured in tonnage sold, in the months of July, November, and
December traditionally have been lower than in other months because of a reduced number of shipping days and holiday or vacation closures for some
customers. Consequently, our sales in the first two quarters of the year are usually higher than in the third and fourth quarters.
8
Capital Expenditures
We continue to make capital investments to maintain, improve, and expand processing capabilities. Investments by us in property, plant, and
equipment, together with asset retirements for the five years ended December 31, 2018, excluding the initial purchase price of acquisitions are set forth
below. The net capital change during such period aggregated to an increase of $79.6 million.
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
Additions
Retirements
or Sales
(In millions)
Net
$
38.4 $
25.1
23.0
22.3
21.6
5.5 $
24.9
5.0
9.1
6.3
32.9
0.2
18.0
13.2
15.3
We currently anticipate capital expenditures, excluding acquisitions, of up to approximately $35 million for 2019. We expect capital expenditures
will be funded from cash generated by operations and available borrowings.
Employees
As of December 31, 2018, we employed approximately 4,300 persons in North America and 300 persons in China. Our North American workforce
was comprised of approximately 1,800 office employees and approximately 2,500 plant employees. Sixteen percent of our plant employees were members
of various unions, including the United Steel Workers and The International Brotherhood of Teamsters.
Renewals of six union contracts covering approximately 107 employees were successfully negotiated in 2018. Four contracts covering 89
employees are currently scheduled to expire in 2019.
Environmental, Health, and Safety Matters
Our facilities and operations are subject to many foreign, federal, state, and local laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment
and to health and safety. In particular, our operations are subject to extensive requirements relating to waste disposal, recycling, air and water emissions,
the handling of regulated materials, remediation, underground storage tanks, asbestos-containing building materials, workplace exposure, and other
matters. We believe that our operations are currently in substantial compliance with all such laws and do not presently anticipate substantial
expenditures in the foreseeable future in order to meet environmental, workplace health or safety requirements, or to pay for any investigations,
corrective action, or claims. Claims, enforcement actions, or investigations regarding personal injury, property damage, or violation of environmental laws
could result in substantial costs to us, divert our management’s attention, and result in significant liabilities, fines, or the suspension or interruption of
our facilities.
We continue to analyze and implement safeguards to mitigate any environmental, health, and safety risks we may face. As a result, additional
costs and liabilities may be incurred to comply with future requirements or to address newly discovered conditions, and these costs and liabilities could
have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows. For example, there is increasing likelihood that additional
regulation of greenhouse gas emissions will occur at the foreign, federal, state, and local level, which could affect us, our suppliers, and our customers.
While the costs of compliance could be significant, given the uncertain outcome and timing of future action by the U.S. federal government and states on
this issue, we cannot accurately predict the financial impact of future greenhouse gas regulations on our operations or our customers at this time. We do
not currently anticipate any new programs disproportionately impacting us compared to our competitors.
Some of the properties currently or previously owned or leased by us are located in industrial areas or have a long history of heavy industrial use.
We may incur environmental liabilities with respect to these properties in the future including costs of investigations, corrective action, claims for natural
resource damages, claims by third parties relating to property damages, or claims relating to contamination at sites where we have sent waste for
treatment or disposal. Based on currently available information we do not expect any investigation, remediation matters, or claims related to properties
presently or formerly owned, operated, or to which we have sent waste for treatment or disposal would have a material adverse effect on our financial
condition, results of operations, or cash flows.
9
In October 2011, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) named us as one of more than 100 businesses that may be a
potentially responsible party for the Portland Harbor Superfund Site (the “PHS Site”). On January 6, 2017, the EPA issued an initial Record of Decision
(“ROD”) regarding the site. The ROD includes a combination of dredging, capping, and enhanced natural recovery that would take approximately thirteen
years to construct plus additional time for monitored natural recovery, at an estimated present value cost of $1.05 billion. At a meeting on December 4,
2018, the EPA announced that it expects parties to submit a plan to remediate the river and harbor per the original ROD within the next 2-3 years. It also
expects allocation of amounts among the parties to be determined in the same time frame. It is willing to consider de minimus and de micromis settlements
but is unlikely to approve any before completion of the remedial design process.
The EPA has not yet allocated responsibility for the contamination among the potentially responsible parties, including JT Ryerson. We do not
currently have sufficient information available to us to determine whether the ROD will be executed as currently stated, whether and to what extent JT
Ryerson may be held responsible for any of the identified contamination, and how much (if any) of the final plan’s costs might ultimately be allocated to
JT Ryerson. Therefore, management cannot predict the ultimate outcome of this matter or estimate a range of potential loss at this time.
Excluding any potential additional remediation costs resulting from any corrective action for the properties described above, we expect spending
for pollution control projects to remain at historical levels below $500,000 per year.
Our United States operations are also subject to the Department of Transportation Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations. We operate a private
trucking motor fleet for making deliveries to some of our customers. Our drivers do not carry any material quantities of hazardous materials. Our foreign
operations are subject to similar regulations. Future regulations could increase maintenance, replacement, and fuel costs for our fleet. These costs could
have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows.
Intellectual Property
We own several U.S. and foreign trademarks, service marks, and copyrights. Certain of the trademarks are registered with the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office and, in certain circumstances, with the trademark offices of various foreign countries. We consider certain other information owned by
us to be trade secrets. We protect our trade secrets by, among other things, entering into confidentiality agreements with our employees regarding such
matters and implementing measures to restrict access to sensitive data and computer software source code on a need-to-know basis. We believe that
these safeguards adequately protect our proprietary rights and we vigorously defend these rights. While we consider all our intellectual property rights
as a whole to be important, we do not consider any single right to be essential to our operations as a whole.
Available Information
All periodic and current reports and other filings that we are required to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), including our
annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, are available free of charge from the SEC’s website (www.sec.gov) or through our
Investor Relations website at www.ir.ryerson.com. Such documents are available as soon as reasonably practicable after electronic filing of the material
with the SEC. Copies of these reports (excluding exhibits) may also be obtained free of charge, upon written request to: Investor Relations, Ryerson
Holding Corporation, 227 W. Monroe St., 27th Floor, Chicago, Illinois 60606.
The Company also posts its Code of Ethics on its website. See “Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance—Code of Ethics” for
more information regarding our Code of Ethics.
Our website address is included in this report for information purposes only. Our website and the information contained therein or connected
thereto are not incorporated into this annual report on Form 10-K.
10
ITEM 1A.
RISK FACTORS.
Our business faces many risks. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below, together with the other information in this
report, including the consolidated financial statements and notes to consolidated financial statements. We cannot assure you that any of the events
discussed in the risk factors below will not occur. These risks could have a material and adverse impact on our business, results of operations,
financial condition, and cash flows.
Risks Related to Our Business and Industry
Weakness in the economy, market trends, and other conditions affecting the profitability and financial stability of our customers could negatively
impact our sales growth and results of operations.
Economic and industry trends affect our business environments. We serve several industries in which the demand for our products and services
is sensitive to the production activity, capital spending, and demand for products and services of our customers. Many of these customers operate in
markets that are subject to highly cyclical fluctuations resulting from seasonality, market uncertainty, costs of goods sold, currency exchange rates,
foreign competition, offshoring of production, oil and natural gas prices, geopolitical developments, and a variety of other factors beyond our control.
Any of these factors could cause customers to idle or close facilities, delay purchases, reduce production levels, or experience reductions in the demand
for their own products or services.
Any of these events could impair the ability of our customers to make full and timely payments or reduce the volume of products and services
these customers purchase from us and could cause increased pressure on our selling prices and terms of sale.
We do not expect the cyclical nature of our industry to change and any downturn in our customers’ industries could reduce our revenues and
profitability or a significant or prolonged slowdown in activity in the United States (U.S.), Canada, or any other major world economy, or a segment of
any such economy, could negatively impact our sales growth and results of operations.
The metals services business is very competitive and increased competition could reduce our revenues and gross margins.
The metals services industry is highly fragmented and competitive, consisting of a large number of small companies and a few relatively large
companies. We face competition in all markets we serve. Competition is based principally on price, service, quality, production capabilities, inventory
availability, and timely delivery. Competition in the various markets in which we participate comes from companies of various sizes, some of which have
greater financial resources than we have and some of which have more established brand names in the local markets we serve. Increased competition
could reduce our market share, force us to lower our prices, or to offer increased services at a higher cost, which could reduce our profitability.
Changing metals prices may have a significant impact on our liquidity, net sales, gross margins, operating income, and net income.
The metals services industry as a whole is cyclical and, at times, pricing and availability of metal can be volatile due to numerous factors beyond
our control, including general domestic and international economic conditions, labor costs, sales levels, competition, levels of inventory held by other
metals service centers, consolidation of metals producers, higher raw material costs for the producers of metals, import duties and tariffs, and currency
exchange rates. This volatility can significantly affect the availability and cost of materials for us.
Our ability to pass on increases in costs in a timely manner depends on market conditions and may result in lower gross margins. We maintain
substantial inventories of metal to accommodate the short lead times and just-in-time delivery requirements of our customers. Accordingly, we purchase
metals in an effort to maintain our inventory at levels that we believe to be appropriate to satisfy the anticipated needs of our customers based upon
historic buying practices, contracts with customers, and market conditions. When metals prices decline, customer demands for lower prices and our
competitors’ responses to those demands result in lower sale prices and, consequently, lower margins as we use existing metals inventory. Declines in
prices or further reductions in sales volumes could adversely impact our ability to maintain our liquidity and to remain in compliance with certain financial
covenants under our $1 billion revolving credit facility (the “Ryerson Credit Facility”), as well as result in us incurring inventory or goodwill impairment
charges. Changing metals prices therefore could significantly impact our liquidity, net sales, gross margins, operating income, and net income.
11
Changes in inflation may adversely affect gross margins.
Inflation impacts the costs at which we can procure product and the ability to increase prices to customers over time. Prolonged periods of
deflation could adversely affect the degree to which we are able to increase sales through price increases.
Unexpected product shortages could negatively impact customer relationships, resulting in an adverse impact on results of operations.
Disruptions could occur due to factors beyond our control, including economic downturns, political unrest, port slowdowns, trade issues,
including increased export or import duties or trade restrictions, and other factors, any of which could adversely affect a supplier’s ability to manufacture
or deliver products. For our sources of lower cost products from Asia and other areas of the world, the risk for disruptions has increased due to the
additional lead time required and distances involved, and the current political climate seeking trade reform. If we were to experience difficulty in obtaining
products, there could be a short-term adverse effect on results of operations and a longer-term adverse effect on customer relationships and our
reputation. In addition, we have strategic relationships with a number of vendors. In the event we are unable to maintain those relations, there might be a
loss of competitive pricing advantages which could, in turn, adversely affect results of operations.
Changes in customer or product mix could cause the gross margin percentage to decline.
From time to time, we experience changes in customer and product mix that affect gross margin. Changes in customer and product mix result
primarily from business acquisitions, changes in customer demand, customer acquisitions, selling and marketing activities, and competition. If rapid
growth with lower margin customers occurs, we will face pressure to maintain current gross margins, as these customers receive more discounted pricing
due to their higher sales volume. There can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain historical gross margins in the future.
The volatility of the market could result in a material impairment of goodwill.
We evaluate goodwill annually on October 1 and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate potential impairment. Events or changes
in circumstances that could trigger an impairment review include significant underperformance relative to our historical or projected future operating
results, significant changes in the manner or the use of our assets or the strategy for our overall business, and significant negative industry or economic
trends. We test for impairment of goodwill by assessing various qualitative factors with respect to development in our business and the overall economy
and calculating the fair value of a reporting unit using a combination of an income approach based on discounted future cash flows and a market
approach at the date of valuation. Under the discounted cash flow method, the fair value of each reporting unit is estimated based on expected future
economic benefits discounted to a present value at a rate of return commensurate with the risk associated with the investment. Projected cash flows are
discounted to present value using an estimated weighted average cost of capital, which considers both returns to equity and debt investors. Please refer
to the Section titled “Critical Accounting Estimates - Goodwill,” of Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results
of Operations,” and Note 1 — “Summary of Accounting and Financial Policies” of Part II, Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" for
further information.
We may not be able to successfully consummate and complete the integration of future acquisitions, and if we are unable to do so, it could disrupt
operations and cause unanticipated increases in costs and/or decreases in revenues and results of operations.
We have grown through a combination of internal expansion, acquisitions, and joint ventures. We intend to continue to grow through selective
acquisitions, but we may not be able to identify appropriate acquisition candidates, obtain financing on satisfactory terms, consummate acquisitions, or
integrate acquired businesses effectively and profitably into our existing operations. Restrictions contained in the agreements governing our notes, the
Ryerson Credit Facility, or our other existing or future debt may also inhibit our ability to make certain investments, including acquisitions, and
participations in joint ventures.
Acquisitions, partnerships, joint ventures, and other business combination transactions, both foreign and domestic, involve various inherent
risks, such as uncertainties in assessing value, strengths, weaknesses, liabilities, and potential profitability. There is also risk relating to our ability to
achieve identified operating and financial synergies anticipated to result from the transactions. Additionally, problems could arise from the integration of
acquired businesses, including unanticipated changes in the business or industry or general economic conditions that affect the assumptions underlying
the acquisition. Our future success will depend on our ability to complete the integration of these future acquisitions successfully into our operations.
Specifically, after any acquisition, customers may choose to diversify their supply chains to reduce reliance on a single supplier for a portion of their
metals needs. We may not be able to retain all of our and an acquisition’s customers, which may adversely affect our business and sales. Integrating
acquisitions, particularly large acquisitions, requires us to enhance our operational and financial systems and employ additional qualified personnel,
management, and financial resources, and may adversely affect our business by diverting management away from
12
day-to-day operations. Further, failure to successfully integrate acquisitions may adversely affect our profitability by creating significant operating
inefficiencies that could increase our operating expenses as a percentage of sales and reduce our operating income. In addition, we may not realize
expected cost savings from acquisitions. Any one or more of these factors could cause us to not realize the benefits anticipated or have a negative
impact on the fair value of the reporting units. Accordingly, goodwill and intangible assets recorded as a result of acquisitions could become impaired.
We may not be able to retain or expand our customer base if the North American manufacturing industry continues to erode through moving
offshore or through acquisition and merger or consolidation activity in our customers’ industries.
Our customer base primarily includes manufacturing and industrial firms. Some of our customers operate in industries that are undergoing
consolidation through acquisition and merger activity; some are considering or have considered relocating production operations overseas or
outsourcing particular functions overseas; and some customers have closed as they were unable to compete successfully with overseas competitors.
Our facilities are predominately located in the United States and Canada. To the extent that our customers cease U.S. operations, relocate or move
operations overseas to regions in which we do not have a presence, we could lose their business. Acquirers of manufacturing and industrial firms may
have suppliers of choice that do not include us, which could impact our customer base and market share.
Certain of our operations are located outside of the United States, which subjects us to risks associated with international activities.
Certain of our operations are located outside of the United States, primarily in Canada, China, and Mexico. We are subject to the Foreign Corrupt
Practices Act (“FCPA”), which generally prohibits U.S. companies and their intermediaries from making corrupt payments or otherwise corruptly giving
any thing of value to foreign officials for the purpose of obtaining or keeping business or otherwise obtaining favorable treatment, and requires
companies to maintain adequate record-keeping and internal accounting practices. The FCPA applies to covered companies, individual directors, officers,
employees, and agents. Under the FCPA, U.S. companies may be held liable for some actions taken by strategic or local partners or representatives. If we
or our intermediaries fail to comply with the requirements of the FCPA, governmental authorities in the United States could seek to impose civil and/or
criminal penalties.
We may be adversely affected by currency fluctuations in the U.S. dollar versus the Canadian dollar and the Chinese renminbi.
We have significant operations in Canada which incur the majority of their metal supply costs in U.S. dollars but earn the majority of their sales in
Canadian dollars. Additionally, we have significant assets in China. We may from time to time experience losses when the value of the U.S. dollar
strengthens against the Canadian dollar or the Chinese renminbi, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. In addition, we
are subject to translation risk when we consolidate our Canadian and Chinese subsidiaries’ net assets into our balance sheet. Fluctuations in the value of
the U.S. dollar versus the Canadian dollar or Chinese renminbi could reduce the value of these assets as reported in our financial statements, which
could, as a result, reduce our stockholders’ equity.
The Chinese government exerts substantial influence over the manner in which we must conduct our business activities, particularly with regards to
the land our facilities are located on.
The Chinese government has exercised and continues to exercise substantial control over the Chinese economy through regulation and state
ownership. Our ability to operate in China may be harmed by changes in its laws and regulations, including those relating to taxation, import and export
tariffs, environmental regulations, land use rights, property, and other matters. We believe that our operations in China are in material compliance with all
applicable legal and regulatory requirements. However, the central or local governments of the jurisdictions in which we operate may impose new, stricter
regulations or interpretations of existing regulations that would require additional expenditures and efforts on our part to ensure our compliance with
such regulations or interpretations. Moreover, the Chinese court system does not provide the same property and contract right guarantees as do courts
in the United States and, accordingly, disputes may be protracted and resolution of claims may result in significant economic loss.
Additionally, there is no private ownership of land in China and all land ownership is held by the government of China, its agencies, and
collectives, which issue land use rights that are generally renewable. We lease the land where our Chinese facilities are located from the Chinese
government. If the Chinese government decided to terminate our land use rights agreements, our assets could become impaired and our ability to meet
customer orders could be impacted.
Damage to our information technology infrastructure could harm our business.
The unavailability of any of our computer-based systems for any significant period of time could have a material adverse effect on our operations.
In particular, our ability to manage inventory levels successfully largely depends on the efficient operation of our
13
computer hardware and software systems. We use management information systems to track inventory information at individual facilities, communicate
customer information, and aggregate daily sales, margin, and promotional information. Difficulties associated with upgrades, installations of major
software or hardware, and integration with new systems could have a material adverse effect on results of operations. We could be required to expend
substantial resources to integrate our information systems with the systems of companies we have acquired. The integration of these systems may
disrupt our business or lead to operating inefficiencies. In addition, these systems are vulnerable to, among other things, damage or interruption from fire,
flood, tornado, and other natural disasters, power loss, computer system and network failures, operator negligence, physical and electronic loss of data,
or security breaches and computer viruses.
We are subject to cybersecurity risks and may incur increasing costs in an effort to minimize those risks.
We depend on the proper functioning and availability of our information technology platform, including communications and data processing
systems, in operating our business. These systems include software programs that are integral to the efficient operation of our business. We have
established security measures, controls, and procedures, including established recovery procedures for critical systems and business functions, to
safeguard our information technology systems and to prevent unauthorized access to such systems and any data processed or stored in such systems,
and we periodically evaluate and test the adequacy of such systems, measures, controls, and procedures; however, there can be no guarantee that such
systems, measures, controls, and procedures will be effective. Security breaches could expose us to a risk of loss or misuse of our information, litigation,
and potential liability. In addition, cyber incidents that impact the availability, reliability, speed, accuracy, or other proper functioning of these systems
could have a significant impact on our operations, and potentially on our results. We may not have the resources or technical sophistication to
anticipate or prevent rapidly evolving types of cyberattacks. A significant cyber incident, including system failure, security breach, disruption by
malware, or other damage could interrupt or delay our operations, result in a violation of applicable privacy and other laws, damage our reputation, cause
a loss of customers, or give rise to monetary fines and other penalties, which could be significant.
Any significant work stoppages can harm our business.
As of December 31, 2018, we employed approximately 4,300 persons in North America and 300 persons in China. Our North American workforce
was comprised of approximately 1,800 office employees and approximately 2,500 plant employees. Sixteen percent of our plant employees were members
of various unions, including the United Steel Workers and The International Brotherhood of Teamsters.
Renewals of six union contracts covering approximately 107 employees were successfully negotiated in 2018. Four union contracts covering 89
employees are currently scheduled to expire in 2019.
Certain employee retirement benefit plans are underfunded and the actual cost of those benefits could exceed current estimates, which would require
us to fund the shortfall.
As of December 31, 2018, our pension plan had an unfunded liability of $181 million. Our actual costs for benefits required to be paid may exceed
those projected and future actuarial assessments to the extent that those costs exceed the current assessment. Under those circumstances, the
adjustments required to be made to our recorded liability for these benefits could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial
condition and cash payments to fund these plans could have a material adverse effect on our cash flows. We may be required to make substantial future
contributions to improve the plan’s funded status.
Future funding for postretirement employee benefits other than pensions also may require substantial payments from current cash flow.
We provide postretirement life insurance and medical benefits to certain eligible retired employees. Our unfunded postretirement benefit obligation
as of December 31, 2018 was $70 million. Our actual costs for benefits required to be paid may exceed those projected and future actuarial assessments to
the extent that those costs exceed the current assessment. Under those circumstances, adjustments will be required to be made to our recorded liability
for these benefits.
Any prolonged disruption of our processing centers could harm our business.
We have dedicated processing centers that permit us to produce standardized products in large volumes while maintaining low operating costs.
We may suffer prolonged disruption in the operations of any of these facilities, whether due to labor or technical difficulties, destruction, or damage to
any of the facilities or otherwise.
14
If we are unable to retain, attract, and motivate management and key personnel, it may adversely affect our business.
In order to compete and have continued growth, we must attract, retain, and motivate executives and other key employees, including those in
managerial, technical, sales, marketing, and support positions. We believe that our success is due, in part, to our experienced management team. Losing
the services of one or more members of our management team such as our CEO, Edward J. Lehner, and CFO, Erich S. Schnaufer, could adversely affect
our business and possibly prevent us from improving our operational, financial, and information management systems and controls. We compete to hire
employees and then must train them and develop their skills and competencies. In the future, we may need to retain and hire additional qualified sales,
marketing, administrative, operating, and technical personnel, and to train and manage new personnel. Our ability to implement our business plan is
dependent on our ability to retain, hire, and train a large number of qualified employees each year. Our results of operations could be adversely affected
by increased costs due to increased competition for employees, higher employee turnover, or increased employee benefit costs.
Our international operations and potential joint ventures may cause us to incur costs and risks that may distract management from effectively
operating our North American business, and such operations or joint ventures may not be profitable.
We maintain foreign operations in Canada, China, and Mexico. International operations are subject to certain risks inherent in conducting
business in, and with, foreign countries, including price controls, exchange controls, export controls, economic sanctions, duties, tariffs, limitations on
participation in local enterprises, nationalization, expropriation and other governmental action, and changes in currency exchange rates. While we believe
that our current arrangements with local partners provide us with experienced business partners in foreign countries, events or issues, including
disagreements with our partners, may occur that require attention of our senior executives and may result in expenses or losses that erode the
profitability of our foreign operations or cause our capital investments abroad to be unprofitable.
Lead time and the cost of our products could increase if we were to lose one of our primary suppliers.
If, for any reason, our primary suppliers of aluminum, carbon steel, stainless steel, or other metals should curtail or discontinue their delivery of
such metals in the quantities needed and at prices that are competitive, our business could suffer. The number of available suppliers could be reduced by
factors such as industry consolidation and bankruptcies affecting steel and metal producers. For the year ended December 31, 2018, our top 25 suppliers
represented approximately 74% of our purchases. We could be significantly and adversely affected if delivery were disrupted from a major supplier. If, in
the future, we were unable to obtain sufficient amounts of the necessary metals at competitive prices and on a timely basis from our traditional suppliers,
we may not be able to obtain such metals from alternative sources at competitive prices to meet our delivery schedules, which could have a material
adverse effect on our sales and profitability.
Global metal overcapacity and imports of metal products into the United States have adversely affected, and may again adversely affect, United
States metal prices, which could impact our sales and results of operations.
Global metal production capacity currently exceeds global consumption of metal products. Such excess capacity sometimes results in metal
manufacturers in certain countries exporting steel at prices that are lower than prevailing domestic prices and sometimes at or below their cost of
production. Excessive imports of metal into the United States, such as in recent years, have exerted and may continue to exert, downward pressure on
United States steel prices which negatively affects our ability to increase our sales and results of operations.
The U.S. government has enacted several trade actions in 2018 including tariffs on imported steel and aluminum products under Section 232 of the
Trade Expansion Act. It is expected that these trade actions, while in effect, will limit metal imports from non-exempt countries. These trade actions have
favorably impacted Ryerson’s average selling prices and gross margins in 2018. If these trade actions are relaxed, repealed, or if relatively higher U.S.
metal prices make it attractive for foreign metal producers to export their products to the U.S., despite the presence of duties or tariffs, the resurgence of
substantial imports of foreign steel could create downward pressure on U.S. metal prices which could have a material adverse effect on sales prices and
future results of operations. Further, foreign administrations have responded to the trade actions imposed by the U.S. with trade actions in kind, adding
further uncertainty to U.S. pricing and supply conditions. To the extent these tariffs and other trade actions result in a decrease in international demand
for steel and aluminum, or products manufactured therefrom and, produced in the United States, or otherwise negatively impact demand for our products,
our business may be adversely impacted.
We could incur substantial costs related to environmental, health, and safety laws.
Our operations are subject to increasingly stringent environmental, health, and safety laws. These include laws that impose limitations on the
discharge of pollutants into the air and water and establish standards for the treatment, storage, and disposal of
15
regulated materials, and the investigation and remediation of contaminated soil, surface water, and groundwater. Failure to maintain or achieve
compliance with these laws or with the permits required for our operations could result in substantial increases in operating costs and capital
expenditures. In addition, we may be subject to fines and civil or criminal sanctions, third party claims for property damage or personal injury, worker’s
compensation or personal injury claims, cleanup costs, or temporary or permanent discontinuance of operations. Certain of our facilities are located in
industrial areas, have a history of heavy industrial use and have been in operation for many years and, over time, we and other predecessor operators of
these facilities have generated, used, handled, and disposed of hazardous and other regulated wastes. Environmental liabilities could exist, including
cleanup obligations at these facilities or at off-site locations where materials from our operations were disposed of, which could result in future
expenditures that cannot be currently quantified and which could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, or cash
flows. Such liabilities may be imposed without regard to fault or the legality of a party’s conduct and may, in certain circumstances, be joint and several.
Future changes to environmental, health, and safety laws, including those related to climate change, could result in material liabilities and costs, constrain
operations or make such operations more costly for us, our suppliers, and our customers.
In October 2011, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) named us as one of more than 100 businesses that may be a
potentially responsible party for the Portland Harbor Superfund Site (the “PHS Site”). On January 6, 2017, the EPA issued an initial Record of Decision
(“ROD”) regarding the site. The ROD includes a combination of dredging, capping, and enhanced natural recovery that would take approximately thirteen
years to construct plus additional time for monitored natural recovery, at an estimated present value cost of $1.05 billion. At a meeting on December 4,
2018, the EPA announced that it expects parties to submit a plan to remediate the river and harbor per the original ROD within the next 2-3 years. It also
expects allocation of amounts among the parties to be determined in the same time frame. It is willing to consider de minimus and de micromis settlements
but is unlikely to approve any before completion of the remedial design process.
The EPA has not yet allocated responsibility for the contamination among the potentially responsible parties, including JT Ryerson. We do not
currently have sufficient information available to us to determine whether the ROD will be executed as currently stated, whether and to what extent JT
Ryerson may be held responsible for any of the identified contamination, and how much (if any) of the final plan’s costs might ultimately be allocated to
JT Ryerson. Therefore, management cannot predict the ultimate outcome of this matter or estimate a range of potential loss at this time.
Regulations related to conflict-free minerals may force us to incur additional expenses and place us at a competitive disadvantage.
On August 22, 2012, under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), the United States
SEC adopted new requirements for reporting companies that use certain minerals and metals, known as “conflict minerals”, in their products, whether or
not these products are manufactured by third parties. These requirements require companies to diligence, disclose, and report whether or not such
minerals originate from the Democratic Republic of Congo and adjoining countries. Since our supply chain is complex, we may not be able to conclusively
verify the origins for all metals used in our products and we may face reputational challenges with our customers. Additionally, as there may be only a
limited number of suppliers offering “conflict free” metals, we cannot be sure that we will be able to obtain necessary metals from such suppliers in
sufficient quantities or at competitive prices. Accordingly, we could incur significant cost related to the compliance process, including potential difficulty
or added costs in satisfying the disclosure requirements. Moreover, we may encounter challenges to satisfy those customers who require that all of the
components of our products be certified as conflict free which could place us at a competitive disadvantage if we are unable to do so.
Tax changes could affect our effective tax rate, the value of our deferred tax assets, and future profitability.
Our future results could be adversely affected by changes in the effective tax rate or changes in the treatment of deferred tax assets as a result of
changes in Ryerson’s overall profitability, changes in the mix of earnings in countries with differing statutory tax rates, changes in tax legislation, the
results of the examination of previously filed tax returns, and continuing assessment of the Company’s tax exposures. In particular, although the passage
of the Tax Cut and Jobs Act of 2017 reduced the U.S. tax rate to 21%, our future earnings could be negatively impacted by changes in tax legislation
including changing tax rates and tax base such as limiting, phasing-out, or eliminating deductions or tax credits, changing rules for earnings repatriations
and changing other tax laws in the U.S. or other countries. In addition, it is uncertain if, and to what extent, various states will conform to the new tax law
and foreign countries will react by adopting tax legislation or taking other actions that could adversely affect our business.
We are subject to litigation that could strain our resources and distract management.
From time to time, we are involved in a variety of claims, lawsuits, and other disputes arising in the ordinary course of business. These suits
concern issues including product liability, contract disputes, employee-related matters, and personal injury matters. It is not feasible to predict the
outcome of all pending suits and claims, and the ultimate resolution of these matters as well as future lawsuits that could have a material adverse effect
on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, or reputation.
16
We may face product liability claims that are costly and create adverse publicity.
If any of the products that we sell cause harm to any of our customers, we could be exposed to product liability lawsuits. If we were found liable
under product liability claims, we could be required to pay substantial monetary damages. Further, even if we successfully defended ourselves against
this type of claim, we could be forced to spend a substantial amount of money in litigation expenses, our management could be required to spend
valuable time in the defense against these claims, and our reputation could suffer.
Our risk management strategies may result in losses.
From time to time, we may use fixed-price and/or fixed-volume supplier contracts to offset contracts with customers. Additionally, we may use
foreign exchange contracts and interest rate swaps to hedge Canadian dollar, Euro, and floating rate debt exposures. These risk management strategies
pose certain risks, including the risk that losses on a hedge position may exceed the amount invested in such instruments. Moreover, a party in a
hedging transaction may be unavailable or unwilling to settle our obligations, which could cause us to suffer corresponding losses. A hedging
instrument may not be effective in eliminating all of the risks inherent in any particular position. Our profitability may be adversely affected during any
period as a result of use of such instruments.
Risks Related to Ownership of Our Common Stock
The market price for our common stock may be volatile.
Historically, there has been volatility in the market price for our common stock. Furthermore, the market price of our common stock could fluctuate
substantially in the future in response to a number of factors, including, but not limited to, the risk factors described herein. Examples include:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
changes in commodity prices, especially metals;
announcement of our quarterly operating results or the operating results of other metals service centers;
changes in financial estimates or recommendations by stock market analysts regarding us or our competitors;
the operating and stock performance of other companies that investors may deem comparable;
press releases, earnings releases, or publicity relating to us or our competitors or relating to trends in the metals service center industry;
inability to meet securities analysts’ and investors’ quarterly or annual estimates or targets of our performance;
sales of our common stock by large or controlling shareholders;
the amount of shares acquired for short-term investments;
general domestic or international economic, market, and political conditions; and
announcements by us or our competitors of significant acquisitions, dispositions or joint ventures, or other material events impacting the
domestic or global metals industry.
In the past, the stock market has experienced significant price and volume fluctuations. This volatility has had a significant effect on the market
prices of securities issued by many companies for reasons unrelated to their specific operating performance. These factors may adversely affect the
trading price of our common stock, regardless of actual operating performance.
In addition, stock markets from time to time experience extreme price and volume fluctuations that may be unrelated or disproportionate to the
operating performance of companies. In the past, some shareholders have brought securities class action lawsuits against companies following periods
of volatility in the market price of their securities. We may in the future be the target of similar litigation. Securities litigation, regardless of whether our
defense is ultimately successful, could result in substantial costs and divert management’s attention and resources.
17
We have a substantial amount of indebtedness, which could adversely affect our financial position and prevent us from fulfilling our financial
obligations.
We currently have a substantial amount of indebtedness. As of December 31, 2018, our total indebtedness was approximately $1,153.3 million and
we had approximately $392 million of unused capacity under the Ryerson Credit Facility. Our substantial indebtedness may:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
make it difficult for us to satisfy our financial obligations, including making scheduled principal and interest payments on our outstanding
notes and our other indebtedness;
limit our ability to borrow additional funds for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, or other general corporate purposes;
limit our ability to use our cash flow for future working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, or other general corporate purposes;
require us to use a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to make debt service payments;
limit our flexibility to plan for, or react to, changes in our business and industry;
place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our less leveraged competitors; and
increase our vulnerability to the impact of adverse economic and industry conditions.
We may also incur additional indebtedness in the future. The terms of the Ryerson Credit Facility and the indenture governing our outstanding
notes restrict but do not prohibit us from doing so, and the indebtedness incurred in compliance with these restrictions could be substantial. If new
indebtedness is added to our current debt levels, the related risks that we now face could intensify.
The covenants in the Ryerson Credit Facility and the indenture governing our notes impose, and covenants contained in agreements governing
indebtedness that we incur in the future may impose, restrictions that may limit our operating and financial flexibility.
The Ryerson Credit Facility and the indenture governing our outstanding notes contain a number of significant restrictions and covenants that
limit our ability and the ability of our restricted subsidiaries, including JT Ryerson, to:
•
•
•
•
•
•
incur additional debt;
pay dividends on our capital stock or repurchase our capital stock;
make certain investments or other restricted payments;
create liens or use assets as security in other transactions;
merge, consolidate, transfer, or dispose of substantially all of our assets; and
engage in transactions with affiliates.
The terms of the Ryerson Credit Facility require that, in the event availability under the facility declines to a certain level, we maintain a minimum
fixed charge coverage ratio at the end of each fiscal quarter. Total credit availability is limited by the amount of eligible accounts receivable, inventory,
and qualified cash pledged as collateral under the agreement insofar as the Company is subject to a borrowing base comprised of the aggregate of these
three amounts, less applicable reserves. As of December 31, 2018, total credit availability was $392 million. See discussion regarding the Ryerson Credit
Facility in the “Liquidity and Capital Resources” section of Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.”
Additionally, subject to certain exceptions, the indenture governing the outstanding notes restricts JT Ryerson’s ability to pay Ryerson Holding
dividends. Our future indebtedness may contain covenants more restrictive in certain respects than the restrictions contained in the Ryerson Credit
Facility and the indenture governing the notes. Operating results below current levels or other adverse factors, including a significant increase in interest
rates, could result in our being unable to comply with financial covenants that are contained in the Ryerson Credit Facility or that may be contained in
any future indebtedness. In addition, complying with these covenants may also cause us to take actions that are not favorable to holders of our notes
and may make it more difficult for us to successfully execute our business strategy and compete against companies that are not subject to such
restrictions.
18
We may not be able to generate sufficient cash to service all of our indebtedness.
We are highly leveraged. Our ability to make payments on our indebtedness depends on our ability to generate cash in the future. Our
outstanding notes, the Ryerson Credit Facility, and our other outstanding indebtedness are expected to account for significant cash interest expenses.
Accordingly, we will have to generate significant cash flows from operations to meet our debt service requirements. If we do not generate sufficient cash
flow to meet our debt service and working capital requirements, we may be required to sell assets, seek additional capital, reduce capital expenditures,
restructure or refinance all or a portion of our existing indebtedness, or seek additional financing. Moreover, insufficient cash flow may make it more
difficult for us to obtain financing on terms that are acceptable to us, or at all.
The right to receive payment on the 2022 Notes and the guarantees will be subordinated to the liabilities of non-guarantor subsidiaries.
The notes and related guarantees are structurally subordinated to all indebtedness of our subsidiaries that are non-guarantors of the 2022 Senior
Secured Notes (the “2022 Notes”). While the indenture governing the 2022 Notes limits the indebtedness and activities of these non-guarantor
subsidiaries, holders of indebtedness of, and trade creditors of, non-guarantor subsidiaries, including lenders under bank financing agreements, are
entitled to payments of their claims from the assets of such subsidiaries before those assets are made available for distribution to any guarantor, as direct
or indirect shareholder. While the non-guarantor subsidiaries have agreed under the indenture not to pledge or encumber their assets (other than with
respect to permitted liens) without equally and ratably securing the notes, they will not guarantee the 2022 Notes notwithstanding any such pledge or
encumbrance in favor of the 2022 Notes.
The non-guarantor subsidiaries represented, respectively, 10.4% and 8.3% of our net sales and EBITDA for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2018. In addition, these non-guarantor subsidiaries represented respectively, 11.2% and 4.8% of our assets and liabilities, as of December 31, 2018.
Accordingly, in the event that any of the non-guarantor subsidiaries or joint venture entities become insolvent, liquidates, or otherwise
reorganizes:
•
•
the creditors of the guarantors (including the holders of the 2022 Notes) will have no right to proceed against such subsidiary’s assets; and
the creditors of such non-guarantor subsidiary, including trade creditors, will generally be entitled to payment in full from the sale or other
disposal of assets of such subsidiary, as direct or indirect shareholder, and will be entitled to receive any distributions from such subsidiary.
Because a portion of our indebtedness bears interest at rates that fluctuate with changes in certain prevailing short-term interest rates, we are
vulnerable to interest rate increases.
A portion of our indebtedness, including the Ryerson Credit Facility, bears interest at rates that fluctuate with changes in certain short-term
prevailing interest rates. As of December 31, 2018, we had approximately $535.9 million of outstanding borrowings under the Ryerson Credit Facility, with
an additional $392 million available for borrowing under such facility. Assuming a consistent level of debt through-out 2018, a 100 basis point change in
the interest rate on our floating rate debt effective from the beginning of the year would increase or decrease our interest expense under the Ryerson
Credit Facility by approximately $4.0 million on an annual basis. If interest rates increase dramatically, we could be unable to service our debt, which
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.
Changes in our credit ratings and outlook may reduce access to capital and increase borrowing costs.
Our credit ratings are based on a number of factors, including our financial strength and factors outside of our control, such as conditions
affecting our industry generally or the introduction of new rating practices and methodologies. We cannot provide assurances that our current credit
ratings will remain in effect or that the ratings will not be lowered, suspended, or withdrawn entirely by the rating agencies. If rating agencies lower,
suspend, or withdraw the ratings, the market price or marketability of our securities may be adversely affected. In addition, any negative change in ratings
could make it more difficult for us to raise capital on acceptable terms, impact the ability to obtain adequate financing, and result in higher interest costs
for our existing credit facilities, including the Ryerson Credit Facility, or on future financings.
19
Platinum owns a significant percentage of our stock and has the right to nominate a majority of the members of the Corporation’s board and will be
able to exert control over matters subject to stockholder approval.
Platinum owns approximately 21,037,500 shares of our common stock, which is approximately 56% of our issued and outstanding common stock.
Therefore, Platinum may be able to determine all matters requiring stockholder approval. For example, Platinum may be able to control elections of
directors, amendments of our organizational documents, or approval of any merger, sale of assets, or other major corporate transaction. This may prevent
or discourage unsolicited acquisition proposals or offers for our common stock that our stockholders may believe are in their best interest as
stockholders.
The Company is party to an investor rights agreement (the “Investor Rights Agreement”) with certain affiliates of Platinum which provides, among
other things, that for so long as Platinum collectively beneficially owns (i) at least 30% of the voting power of the outstanding capital stock of the
Company, Platinum will have the right to nominate for election to the board of directors of the Company no fewer than that number of directors that
would constitute a majority of the number of directors if there were no vacancies on the board, (ii) at least 15% but less than 30% of the voting power of
the outstanding capital stock of the Company, Platinum will have the right to nominate two directors and (iii) at least 5% but less than 15% of the voting
power of the outstanding capital stock of the Company, Platinum will have the right to nominate one director. The agreement also provides that if the size
of the board of directors is increased or decreased at any time, Platinum’s nomination rights will be proportionately increased or decreased, respectively,
rounded up to the nearest whole number. As a result of Platinum’s ownership of a majority of the Company’s outstanding capital stock as well its board
nomination rights pursuant to the Investor Rights Agreement, Platinum may significantly influence or effectively control our policies and operations,
including the appointment of management, future issuances of our common stock or other securities, and the payment of dividends. In addition, Platinum
has significant control over our decisions to enter into any other corporate transaction.
The interests of Platinum may not in all cases be aligned with the interests of the other holders of our common stock. For example, a sale of a
substantial number of shares of stock in the future by Platinum could cause our stock price to decline. Further, Platinum could cause us to make
acquisitions that increase the amount of the indebtedness that is secured or senior to the Company’s existing debt or sell revenue-generating assets,
impairing our ability to make payments under such debt. Additionally, Platinum is in the business of making investments in companies and may from time
to time acquire and hold interests in businesses that compete directly or indirectly with us. Accordingly, Platinum may also pursue acquisition
opportunities that may be complementary to our business, and as a result, those acquisition opportunities may not be available to us. In addition,
Platinum may have an interest in pursuing acquisitions, divestitures, and other transactions that, in their judgment, could enhance their equity
investment, even though such transactions might involve risks to holders of our common stock.
We are exempt from certain corporate governance requirements because we are a “controlled company” within the meaning of the NYSE rules and,
as a result, our stockholders do not have the protections afforded by these corporate governance requirements.
Because Platinum controls more than 50% of the voting power of our common stock, we are considered to be a “controlled company” for
purposes of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) listing requirements. Under the NYSE rules, a “controlled company” may elect not to comply with
certain NYSE corporate governance requirements, including (1) the requirement that a majority of our Board of Directors consist of independent directors,
(2) the requirement that the nominating and corporate governance committee of our Board of Directors be composed entirely of independent directors,
(3) the requirement that the compensation committee of our Board of Directors be composed entirely of independent directors, and (4) the requirement for
an annual performance evaluation of the nomination/corporate governance and compensation committees. Given that Platinum controls a majority of the
voting power of our common stock, we are permitted, and have elected, to opt out of compliance with certain NYSE corporate governance requirements.
Accordingly, holders of our common stock do not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that are subject to all of the NYSE
corporate governance requirements.
20
Our corporate documents and Delaware law contain provisions that could discourage, delay, or prevent a change in control of the Company.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws contain provisions that may make the acquisition of our
company more difficult without the approval of our Board of Directors. These provisions:
•
•
•
•
•
establish a classified Board of Directors so that not all members of our Board of Directors are elected at one time;
authorize the issuance of undesignated preferred stock, the terms of which may be established and the shares of which may be issued
without stockholder approval, and which may include super voting, special approval, dividend, or other rights or preferences superior to the
rights of the holders of common stock;
provide that the Board of Directors is expressly authorized to make, alter, or repeal our amended and restated bylaws;
prohibit stockholders from acting by written consent if less than a majority of the voting power of our outstanding stock is controlled by
Platinum; and
establish advance notice requirements for nominations for elections to our Board of Directors or for proposing matters that can be acted
upon by stockholders at stockholder meetings.
These anti-takeover provisions and other provisions under Delaware law could discourage, delay, or prevent a transaction involving a change in
control of our company, even if doing so would benefit our stockholders. These provisions could also discourage proxy contests and make it more
difficult for our stockholders to elect directors of their choosing and to cause us to take other corporate actions they desire.
Any issuance of preferred stock could make it difficult for another company to acquire us or could otherwise adversely affect holders of our common
stock, which could depress the price of our common stock.
Our Board of Directors will have the authority to issue preferred stock and to determine the preferences, limitations, and relative rights of shares of
preferred stock and to fix the number of shares constituting any series and the designation of such series, without any further vote or action by our
stockholders. Our preferred stock could be issued with voting, liquidation, dividend, and other rights superior to the rights of our common stock. The
potential issuance of preferred stock may delay or prevent a change in control of us, discouraging bids for our common stock at a premium over the
market price, and adversely affect the market price and the voting and other rights of the holders of our common stock.
We have not and do not intend to pay regular cash dividends on our stock.
We do not anticipate declaring or paying regular cash dividends on our common stock or any other equity security in the foreseeable future. The
amounts that may be available to us to pay cash dividends are restricted under our debt agreements. Any payment of cash dividends on our common
stock in the future will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend upon our results of operations, earnings, capital requirements,
financial condition, future prospects, contractual restrictions, and other factors deemed relevant by our Board of Directors. Therefore, you should not
rely on dividend income from shares of our common stock. For more information, see “Dividend Policy.” Your only opportunity to achieve a return on
your investment in us may be if the market price of our common stock appreciates and you sell your shares at a profit, but there is no guarantee that the
market price for our common stock will ever exceed the price that you pay for our common stock.
ITEM 1B.
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.
Not applicable.
21
ITEM 2.
PROPERTIES.
As of December 31, 2018, the Company’s facilities are set forth below:
Operations in the United States
JT Ryerson maintains 84 operational facilities, including 6 locations that are dedicated to administration services. All of our metals service center
facilities are in good condition and are adequate for JT Ryerson’s existing operations. Approximately 40% of these facilities are leased. The lease terms
expire at various times through 2028. Owned properties noted as vacated below have been closed and are in the process of being sold. JT Ryerson’s
properties and facilities are adequate to serve its present and anticipated needs.
Location
Birmingham, AL
Mobile, AL
Fort Smith, AR
Hickman, AR**
Little Rock, AR**
Phoenix, AZ
Dos Palos, CA
Fresno, CA
Livermore, CA
Vernon, CA
Commerce City, CO
South Windsor, CT
Wilmington, DE
Jacksonville, FL
Tampa Bay, FL
Lavonia, GA
Norcross, GA
Norcross, GA**
Des Moines, IA
Eldridge, IA**
Marshalltown, IA
Chicago, IL (Headquarters)*
Chicago, IL
Chicago, IL
Chicago, IL
Dekalb, IL
Elgin, IL
Lisle, IL*
Burns Harbor, IN
Indianapolis, IN
Portage, IN
Wichita, KS
Shelbyville, KY**
Shreveport, LA
St. Rose, LA
Devens, MA
Detroit, MI*
Grand Rapids, MI*
Lansing, MI
Minneapolis, MN
Plymouth, MN
Maryland Heights, MO
North Kansas City, MO
Jackson, MS
22
Own/Lease
Owned
Owned
Owned
Leased
Owned
Owned
Leased
Leased
Leased
Owned
Owned
Leased/Vacated
Owned
Owned
Owned
Owned
Leased
Owned
Owned
Leased
Owned
Leased
Owned
Leased
Leased/Vacated
Leased
Leased
Leased
Owned
Owned
Leased
Leased
Owned
Owned
Owned
Owned
Leased
Leased
Leased
Owned
Owned
Leased
Owned
Owned
Charlotte, NC**
Charlotte, NC
Greensboro, NC (2)
Pikeville, NC
Youngsville, NC
Omaha, NE
Lancaster, NY
Cincinnati, OH
Columbus, OH
Hamilton, OH*
Hilliard, OH
Streetsboro, OH
Strongsville, OH
Warren, OH
Oklahoma City, OK
Tulsa, OK
Tigard, OR
Ambridge, PA**
Fairless Hills, PA**
Pittsburgh, PA*
Charleston, SC**
Greenville, SC
Wellford, SC
Chattanooga, TN
Chattanooga, TN
Gallatin, TN
Knoxville, TN*
Memphis, TN
Dallas, TX
El Paso, TX
Houston, TX
Houston, TX (2)
McAllen, TX
Odessa, TX
Salt Lake City, UT
Pounding Mill, VA
Richmond, VA
Renton, WA
Spokane, WA
Green Bay, WI
Green Bay, WI
Hammond, WI
Milwaukee, WI
Milwaukee, WI
*
**
Office space only
Processing centers
23
Owned
Leased
Owned
Leased
Leased
Owned
Owned
Owned
Leased
Leased
Owned
Leased
Owned
Leased/Vacated
Owned
Owned
Leased
Owned
Leased
Leased/Vacated
Owned
Owned
Owned
Owned
Leased
Leased
Leased
Owned
Owned
Leased
Owned
Leased
Leased
Leased/Vacated
Leased
Owned
Owned
Owned
Owned
Owned
Leased
Leased
Owned
Owned/Vacated
Operations in Canada
Ryerson Canada, a wholly-owned indirect Canadian subsidiary of Ryerson Holding, has nine operational facilities in Canada. All of the metals
service center facilities are in good condition and are adequate for Ryerson Canada’s existing and anticipated operations. Four facilities are leased. The
lease terms expire at various times through 2025.
Location
Calgary, AB
Edmonton, AB
Richmond, BC
Winnipeg, MB
Winnipeg, MB
Saint John, NB
Brampton, ON
Burlington, ON (includes Canadian Headquarters)
Laval, QC
Vaudreuil, QC
Operations in China
Own/Lease
Owned
Owned
Owned
Owned
Leased
Owned
Leased
Leased
Leased/Vacated
Leased
Ryerson China, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Ryerson Holding, has five service and processing centers in China, at Guangzhou,
Dongguan, Kunshan, and Tianjin, performing coil processing, sheet metal fabrication, and plate processing. Ryerson China’s headquarters office
building is located in Kunshan. We own four buildings in China and have purchased the related land use rights. The remaining facility is leased. All of
the facilities are in good condition and are adequate for Ryerson China’s existing and anticipated operations.
Operations in Mexico
Ryerson Mexico, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Ryerson Holding, has four facilities in Mexico. We have service centers in Monterrey,
Tijuana, Hermosillo, and Queretaro, all of which are leased. The facilities are in good condition and are adequate for Ryerson Mexico’s existing and
anticipated operations.
ITEM 3.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
In October 2011, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) named us as one of more than 100 businesses that may be a
potentially responsible party for the Portland Harbor Superfund Site (“Portland Harbor”). On January 6, 2017, the EPA issued an initial Record of
Decision (“ROD”) regarding the site. The ROD includes a combination of dredging, capping, and enhanced natural recovery that would take
approximately thirteen years to construct plus additional time for monitored natural recovery, at an estimated present value cost of $1.05 billion. At a
meeting on December 4, 2018, the EPA announced that it expects parties to submit a plan to remediate the river and harbor per the original ROD within the
next 2-3 years. It also expects allocation of amounts among the parties to be determined in the same time frame. It is willing to consider de minimus and de
micromis settlements but is unlikely to approve any before completion of the remedial design process.
The EPA has not yet allocated responsibility for the contamination among the potentially responsible parties, including JT Ryerson. We do not
currently have sufficient information available to us to determine whether the ROD will be executed as currently stated, whether and to what extent JT
Ryerson may be held responsible for any of the identified contamination, and how much (if any) of the final plan’s costs might ultimately be allocated to
JT Ryerson. Therefore, management cannot predict the ultimate outcome of this matter or estimate a range of potential loss at this time.
There are various other claims and pending actions against the Company. The amount of liability, if any, for those claims and actions at
December 31, 2018 is not determinable but, in the opinion of management, such liability, if any, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s
financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. We maintain liability insurance coverage to assist in protecting our assets from losses arising from
or related to activities associated with business operations.
ITEM 4.
MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.
Not applicable.
24
PART II
ITEM 5.
MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS, AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF
EQUITY SECURITIES.
Market Information for Common Stock
Our common stock has been listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “RYI” and was first traded on August 13, 2014.
Holders
As of February 28, 2019, there were 2 stockholders of record of our common stock. Because many shares of our common stock are held by brokers
and other institutions on behalf of stockholders, we are unable to estimate the total number of beneficial stockholders represented by these record
holders.
Dividend Policy
We have not declared any cash dividends for the past two years and we do not anticipate declaring or paying any regular cash dividends on our
common stock in the foreseeable future. Any payment of cash dividends on our common stock in the future will be at the discretion of our Board of
Directors and will depend upon our results of operations, earnings, capital requirements, financial condition, future prospects, contractual restrictions,
including under the Ryerson Credit Facility and our outstanding notes, and other factors deemed relevant by our Board of Directors.
25
Performance Graph
The following graph and accompanying table show the cumulative total return to stockholders of Ryerson Holding’s common stock relative to the
cumulative total returns of the S&P 500 and a metals service center peer group (the “Peer Group”). The graph tracks the performance of a $100 investment
in each of the indices (with reinvestment of dividends) from August 13, 2014 to December 31, 2018. As of December 31, 2018 the Peer Group consisted of
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. and Olympic Steel Inc., each of which has securities listed for trading on the NASDAQ; and Russel Metals Inc., which
has securities listed for trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange. The returns of each member of the Peer Group are weighted according to that member’s
stock market capitalization. The stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.
Comparison of 53 Month Cumulative Total Return
Assumes Initial Investment of $100
December 2018
This graph is not deemed to be “filed” with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or subject to the liabilities of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act), and should not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any of our prior or subsequent
filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act.
Ryerson Holding
S&P 500
Peer Group
8/13/14
12/31/14
12/31/15
12/31/16
12/31/17
12/31/18
$
$
$
100.00 $
100.00 $
100.00 $
96.41 $
107.12 $
86.21 $
45.34 $
108.55 $
78.54 $
129.61 $
120.94 $
118.09 $
100.97 $
145.93 $
127.92 $
61.55
140.09
108.23
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
None.
Recent Sale of Unregistered Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
ITEM 6.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.
The following table sets forth our selected historical consolidated financial information. Our selected historical Consolidated Statements of
Operations data for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2017 and 2018 and the summary historical balance sheet data as of December 31, 2017 and 2018
have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” The selected
historical Consolidated Statements of Operations data for the years
26
ended December 31, 2014 and 2015 and the summary historical balance sheet data as of December 31, 2014, 2015, and 2016 were derived from the audited
financial statements and related notes thereto, which are not included in this Form 10-K.
The following consolidated financial information should be read together with Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations” and the audited Consolidated Financial Statements of Ryerson Holding Corporation and the Notes thereto
included in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
FIVE YEAR SUMMARY OF SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA AND OPERATING RESULTS
(Dollars in millions, except per ton and per share data)
Statements of Operations Data:
Net sales
Cost of materials sold
Gross profit
Warehousing, delivery, selling, general, and administrative (1) (2)
Gain on sale of assets
Restructuring and other charges
Impairment charges on assets
Operating profit
Other income and (expense), net (2) (3)
Interest and other expense on debt (4)
Income (loss) before income taxes
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
Net income (loss)
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest
Net income (loss) attributable to Ryerson Holding Corporation
Earnings (loss) per share of common stock: (5)
Basic earnings (loss) per share
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
Weighted average shares outstanding — Basic
Weighted average shares outstanding — Diluted
Balance Sheet Data (at period end):
Cash and cash equivalents
Restricted cash
Working capital
Property, plant, and equipment, net
Total assets
Long-term debt, including current maturities
Total equity (deficit)
Other Financial Data:
Cash flows provided by (used in) operations
Cash flows used in investing activities
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities
Capital expenditures
Depreciation and amortization
Volume and Per Ton Data:
Tons shipped (000)
Average selling price per ton
Gross profit per ton
Operating expenses per ton
Operating profit per ton
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
2018
Year Ended December 31,
2016
2017
2015
2014
4,408.4 $
3,650.3
758.1
614.7
—
4.2
—
139.2
76.7
(99.2 )
116.7
10.3
106.4
0.4
106.0 $
2.84 $
2.81 $
37.3
37.7
23.2 $
1.1
844.1
489.0
2,086.3
1,153.3
75.9
57.4 $
(200.2 )
92.9
38.4
52.9
2,268
1,944 $
334
273
61
3,364.7 $
2,782.2
582.5
481.4
—
—
—
101.1
6.6
(91.0 )
16.7
(1.3 )
18.0
0.9
17.1 $
2,859.7 $
2,289.1
570.6
447.5
—
1.0
—
122.1
(6.1 )
(89.9 )
26.1
7.2
18.9
0.2
18.7 $
0.46 $
0.46 $
37.2
37.3
0.55 $
0.54 $
34.3
34.4
77.4 $
1.1
701.2
422.9
1,711.9
1,045.7
(7.4 )
80.7 $
1.0
665.4
388.2
1,558.7
963.5
(49.3 )
(2.5 ) $
(70.3 )
65.7
25.1
47.1
2,000
1,682 $
291
241
50
24.8 $
(19.8 )
11.4
23.0
42.5
1,903
1,503 $
300
236
64
3,167.2 $
2,599.5
567.7
451.9
(1.9 )
2.5
7.7
107.5
(9.3 )
(96.3 )
1.9
3.7
(1.8 )
(1.3 )
(0.5 ) $
(0.02 ) $
(0.02 ) $
32.1
32.1
63.2 $
1.2
643.0
400.3
1,545.2
1,023.5
(140.9 )
258.9 $
(18.0 )
(232.0 )
22.3
43.7
1,897
1,670 $
299
243
56
3,622.2
3,028.4
593.8
512.2
(1.8 )
—
—
83.4
(2.9 )
(107.4 )
(26.9 )
(0.7 )
(26.2 )
(0.5 )
(25.7 )
(1.01 )
(1.01 )
25.4
25.4
60.0
2.0
846.0
428.2
1,855.6
1,242.1
(124.5 )
(73.3 )
(34.0 )
100.5
21.6
45.6
2,024
1,790
293
252
41
(1)
The year ended December 31, 2014 includes $32.7 million of one-time IPO-related expenses.
As a result of adopting Accounting Standards Update 2017-07, "Compensation - Retirement Benefits: Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost
(2)
and Net Periodic Post Retirement Benefit Cost," we have reclassified benefits of $8.9 million, $11.1 million, $1.1 million, and $3.0 million in the year ended December 31,
2017, 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively, from Warehousing, delivery, selling, general, and administrative expense to Other income and (expense), net.
27
The year ended December 31, 2018 includes a $70.0 million gain on bargain purchase related to our Central Steel and Wire Company acquisition. The year ended
(3)
December 31, 2017 includes an other-than-temporary impairment charge of $0.2 million related to an equity investment. The year ended December 31, 2016 includes an
other-than-temporary impairment charge of $4.7 million related to an equity investment and a $8.7 million loss on the retirement of debt related to the purchases and
retirement of our 9.0% Senior Notes due 2017 (the “ 2017 Notes”) and 11.25% Senior Notes due 2018 (the “ 2018 Notes”). The year ended December 31, 2015 includes an
other-than-temporary impairment charge of $12.3 million in the first quarter of 2015 related to an equity investment and a $0.3 million gain on the retirement of debt related
to the purchases of a portion of our 2017 Notes and 2018 Notes. The year ended December 31, 2014 includes $11.2 million of expense related to the premium paid to redeem
$99.5 million of 2018 Notes. Remaining amounts in each year are related to foreign currency gains (losses).
(4)
31, 2015 includes a $2.9 million write off of debt issuance costs associated with our prior credit facility upon entering into a new revolving credit facility on July 24, 2015.
The year ended December 31, 2018 included a $0.5 million write off of debt issuance costs related to the repurchase of the 2022 Notes. The year ended December
(5)
The following amounts related to earnings per share and shares outstanding have been adjusted for the Stock Split for all periods reported.
On July 23, 2014, our Board of Directors approved a 4.25 for 1.00 stock split (the “ Stock Split”) of the Company’s common stock effective August 5, 2014.
28
ITEM 7.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with Item 6. “Selected Financial Data” and the audited Consolidated
Financial Statements of Ryerson Holding Corporation and Subsidiaries and the Notes thereto in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. See the section entitled “Special Note Regarding Forward-
Looking Statements.” Our actual results and the timing of selected events could differ materially from those discussed in these forward-looking
statements as a result of certain factors, including those discussed in Item 1A. “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
Overview
Business
Ryerson Holding Corporation (“Ryerson Holding”), a Delaware corporation, is the parent company of Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc. (“JT
Ryerson”), a Delaware corporation. Affiliates of Platinum Equity, LLC (“Platinum”) own approximately 21,037,500 shares of our common stock, which is
approximately 56% of our issued and outstanding common stock.
We are a leading metals service center, a value-added processor and distributor of industrial metals with operations in the United States through
JT Ryerson, in Canada through our indirect wholly-owned subsidiary Ryerson Canada, Inc., a Canadian corporation (“Ryerson Canada”), and in Mexico
through our indirect wholly-owned subsidiary Ryerson Metals de Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V., a Mexican corporation (“Ryerson Mexico”). In addition to
our North American operations, we conduct materials processing and distribution operations in China through an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary,
Ryerson China Limited (“Ryerson China”). Unless the context indicates otherwise, Ryerson Holding, JT Ryerson, Ryerson Canada, Ryerson China, and
Ryerson Mexico, together with their subsidiaries, are collectively referred to herein as “Ryerson,” “we,” “us,” “our,” or the “Company.”
Industry and Operating Trends
We are a metals service center providing value-added processing and distribution of industrial metals with operations in the United States,
Canada, Mexico, and China. We purchase large quantities of metal products from primary producers and sell these materials in smaller quantities to a
wide variety of metals-consuming industries. More than 75% of the metals products sold are processed by us by bending, beveling, blanking, blasting,
burning, cutting-to-length, drilling, embossing, flattening, forming, grinding, laser cutting, machining, notching, painting, perforating, polishing,
punching, rolling, sawing, scribing, shearing, slitting, stamping, tapping, threading, welding, or other techniques to process materials to a specified
thickness, length, width, shape, and surface quality pursuant to specific customer orders.
Similar to other metals service centers, we maintain substantial inventories of metals to accommodate the short lead times and just-in-time delivery
requirements of our customers. Accordingly, we purchase metals to maintain our inventory at levels that we believe to be appropriate to satisfy the
anticipated needs of our customers based upon customer forecasts, historic buying practices, supply agreements with customers, mill lead times, and
market conditions. Our commitments to purchase metals are generally at prevailing market prices in effect at the time we place our orders. At the request
of our customers, we have entered into swaps in order to mitigate our customers’ risk of volatility in the price of metals and we have entered into metals
hedges to mitigate our own risk of volatility in the price of metals. We have no long-term, fixed-price metals purchase contracts. When metals prices
decline, customer demands for lower prices and our competitors’ responses to those demands could result in lower sale prices and, consequently, lower
gross profits and earnings as we sell existing metals inventory. When metals prices increase, competitive conditions will influence how much of the price
increase we may pass on to our customers.
The metals service center industry is cyclical and volatile in both demand and pricing, and difficult to predict. In 2018, we saw improved demand
when viewed against the year ago period. According to the Metal Service Center Institute, U.S. service center volumes have increased by four percent
compared to the year-ago period. In 2018, we experienced year-over-year growth in shipment volumes to nearly all of our end markets, most notably in
the ground transportation and metal fabrication and machine shop sectors. We saw year-over-year shipment declines only in the HVAC and
construction equipment sectors.
Overall, commodity prices trended higher in 2018. CRU hot-rolled carbon steel prices rose 21%, Midwest aluminum prices rose 3%, and stainless
304 surcharge prices rose 2% during the year. Higher commodity prices translated into higher selling prices for Ryerson, with per ton pricing increases of
16% during the year. Stronger demand and pricing were offset by higher procured metal costs, which resulted in flat gross margins in 2018.
29
Recent Industry Developments
On March 1, 2018, the White House announced a 25% tariff on all imported steel products and 10% tariff on all imported aluminum products for an
indefinite amount of time under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act. Subsequently, the White House announced steel quotas, in lieu of tariffs, with
South Korea. On May 1, 2018, the White House further announced agreements-in-principle with Argentina, Australia, and Brazil for permanent
exemptions from the tariffs in exchange for export quotas or voluntary export restraints, with the exception of Australia which has not agreed to quotas at
the time of this release. In August 2018, steel tariffs were increased to 50% for Turkey to offset inflation in the Turkish Lira.
Further trade actions announced by the U.S. under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 imposed a 25% additional duty on $34 billion worth of
Chinese imports effective July 6, 2018. In September 2018, the U.S. imposed a 10% tariff on $200 billion in additional Chinese imported goods to increase
to 25% by March 1, 2019. Ryerson expects upward price pressure on metal products in the U.S. to the extent the Section 232 tariffs or other trade actions
remain enacted with U.S. trading partners.
Foreign administrations have responded to the trade actions imposed by the U.S. with trade actions in kind, adding further uncertainty to U.S.
pricing and supply conditions.
Acquisitions
On April 2, 2018, we acquired Fanello Industries (“Fanello”), a privately-owned metal service company located in Lavonia, Georgia. Fanello is a
processor and service provider that supplies blanking, stamping, laser cutting, bending, and machining metal solutions to a diverse group of industries in
the Southeastern United States.
On July 2, 2018, JT Ryerson acquired Central Steel and Wire Company (“CS&W”). CS&W is a leading metal service center with locations across
the Central and Eastern United States offering a wide selection of products and capabilities, with a commercial portfolio centered on bar, tube, plate, and
steel products. CS&W expanded our long, tube, and plate portfolio. Our combined commercial, operational, and processing strengths will provide a
broader and deeper array of products to our customers in the Midwest and Northeast United States. The fair value of the consideration totaled $163.5
million. Included in the 2018 financial results is $347.5 million of revenue and $78.5 million, including a $70.0 million bargain purchase gain, of net income
from CS&W since the acquisition date. Please refer to Note 2 — “Acquisitions” of Part II, Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" for
further information on our 2018 acquisition of CS&W.
Components of Results of Operations
We generate substantially all of our revenue from sales of our metals products. The majority of revenue is recognized upon delivery of product to
customers. The timing of shipment is substantially the same as the timing of delivery to customers given the proximity of our distribution sites to our
customers. Revenues associated with products which we believe have no alternative use, and where the Company has an enforceable right to payment,
are recognized on an over-time basis. Over-time revenues are recorded in proportion with the progress made toward completing the performance
obligation.
Sales, cost of materials sold, gross profit, and operating expense control are the principal factors that impact our profitability:
Net Sales. Our sales volume and pricing are driven by market demand, which is largely determined by overall industrial production and conditions
in specific industries in which our customers operate. Sales prices are also primarily driven by market factors such as overall demand and availability of
product. Our net sales include revenue from product sales, net of returns, allowances, customer discounts, and incentives.
Cost of materials sold. Cost of materials sold includes metal purchase and in-bound freight costs, third-party processing costs, and direct and
indirect internal processing costs. The cost of materials sold fluctuates with our sales volume and our ability to purchase metals at competitive prices.
Increases in sales volume generally enable us both to improve purchasing leverage with suppliers, as we buy larger quantities of metals inventories.
Gross profit. Gross profit is the difference between net sales and the cost of materials sold. Our sales prices to our customers are subject to market
competition. Achieving acceptable levels of gross profit is dependent on our acquiring metals at competitive prices, our ability to manage the impact of
changing prices, and efficiently managing our internal and external processing costs.
Operating expenses. Optimizing business processes and asset utilization to lower fixed expenses such as employee, facility, and truck fleet costs
which cannot be rapidly reduced in times of declining volume, and maintaining low fixed cost structure in times of increasing sales volume, have a
significant impact on our profitability. Operating expenses include costs related to warehousing and distributing our products as well as selling, general,
and administrative expenses.
30
The following table sets forth our condensed consolidated statements of income data:
Results of Operations
Net sales
Cost of materials sold
Gross profit
Warehousing, delivery, selling, general, and
administrative expenses
Restructuring and other charges
Operating profit
Other expenses
Income before income taxes
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
Net income
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
Net income attributable to Ryerson Holding
Corporation
Basic earnings per share
Diluted earnings per share
Year Ended
December 31,
2018
% of Net
Sales
Year Ended
December 31,
2017
% of Net
Sales
Year Ended
December 31,
2016
% of Net
Sales
$
4,408.4
3,650.3
758.1
100.0 % $
82.8
17.2
3,364.7
2,782.2
582.5
100.0 % $
82.7
17.3
2,859.7
2,289.1
570.6
100.0 %
80.0
20.0
614.7
4.2
139.2
(22.5 )
116.7
10.3
106.4
0.4
106.0
2.84
2.81
13.9
0.1
3.2
(0.6 )
2.6
0.2
2.4
—
2.4 % $
$
$
481.4
—
101.1
(84.4 )
16.7
(1.3 )
18.0
0.9
17.1
0.46
0.46
14.3
—
3.0
(2.5 )
0.5
—
0.5
—
0.5 % $
$
$
447.5
1.0
122.1
(96.0 )
26.1
7.2
18.9
0.2
18.7
0.55
0.54
$
$
$
The following table shows the Company’s percentage of sales by major product line:
Product Line
Carbon Steel Flat
Carbon Steel Plate
Carbon Steel Long
Stainless Steel Flat
Stainless Steel Plate
Stainless Steel Long
Aluminum Flat
Aluminum Plate
Aluminum Long
Other
Total
2018
Year Ended December 31,
2017
(Percentage of Sales)
2016
27 %
11
14
16
4
4
15
3
4
2
100 %
28 %
10
12
18
4
4
15
3
4
2
100 %
31
15.7
—
4.3
(3.4 )
0.9
0.2
0.7
—
0.7 %
28 %
9
13
17
4
3
16
3
5
2
100 %
Comparison of the year ended December 31, 2018 with the year ended December 31, 2017
Net Sales
Net sales
Net sales, same-store
$
$
Tons sold
Tons sold, same-store
2018
2018
Year Ended December 31,
2017
($ in millions)
Dollar
change
Percentage
change
4,408.4 $
4,060.9 $
3,364.7
3,364.7
$
$
1,043.7
696.2
31.0 %
20.7 %
Year Ended December 31,
2017
(in thousands)
Tons
change
Percentage
change
2,268
2,081
2,000
2,000
268
81
13.4 %
4.1 %
Average selling price per ton sold
Average selling price per ton sold, same-store
$
$
1,944 $
1,951 $
1,682
1,682
$
$
262
269
15.6 %
16.0 %
Year Ended December 31,
2018
2017
Price
change
Percentage
change
Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2018 increased from the same period a year ago due to higher average selling prices and higher tons
sold reflecting improved economic conditions in the metals market. Net sales and tons sold also increased in 2018 due to the acquisition of CS&W on
July 2, 2018. Excluding CS&W (same-store results), average selling price per ton increased for all of our product lines in 2018 with the largest increases in
our carbon plate, aluminum plate, and stainless plate products. Prices increased for our product lines in 2018 compared to 2017 as the impact of Section
232 tariffs favorably impacted metal prices along with improved demand. As more fully discussed in Item 1A “Risk Factors” of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K, the tariffs imposed on certain metal products under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 have led to significant increases in the
prices of the products we sell and our profitability. A rapid decline in metal prices from current levels could result in a significant adverse effect on our
revenues, gross profit, and net income. Excluding CS&W, tons sold also increased in 2018 for all of our product lines with the largest increases in
shipments of our carbon plate, stainless plate, and aluminum flat product lines. Tons sold per ship day were 9,000 in 2018 as compared to 7,968 in 2017.
Excluding CS&W, tons sold per ship day were 8,258 in 2018.
Cost of Materials Sold
Cost of materials sold
$
3,650.3
82.8 % $
2,782.2
82.7 % $
868.1
31.2 %
Year Ended December 31,
2018
2017
$
% of Net
Sales
$
% of Net
Sales
Dollar
change
Percentage
change
($ in millions)
Average cost of materials per ton sold
Year Ended December 31,
Dollar
Percentage
2018
2017
change
change
$
1,610
$
1,391
$
219
15.7 %
The increase in cost of materials sold in 2018 compared to 2017 was primarily due to an increase in the average cost of materials sold per ton and
the increase in tons sold. The average cost of materials sold increased for all of our product lines during 2018 with our carbon plate, stainless plate, and
stainless long product lines increasing more than our other products lines.
During 2018, LIFO expense was $90 million related to increases in pricing for all product lines. During 2017, LIFO expense was $44 million related to
increases in pricing for all product lines. LIFO expense in 2017 was offset by a $24 million credit to reverse the lower of cost or market inventory reserve.
32
Gross Profit
Year Ended December 31,
Gross profit
$
758.1
17.2 % $
2018
$
% of Net
Sales
2017
$
% of Net
Sales
Dollar change
Percentage
change
($ in millions)
582.5
17.3 % $
175.6
30.1 %
Gross profit dollars increased in 2018 compared to 2017 due to the increases in average selling price and tons sold as well as the acquisition of
CS&W. During 2018, our revenue per ton increased at approximately the same pace as the increase in cost of materials sold per ton resulting in stable
gross margins compared to the prior year.
Operating Expenses
Year Ended December 31,
2018
$
% of Net
Sales
2017
% of Net
$
Sales
($ in millions)
Dollar
change
Percentage
change
Warehousing, delivery, selling, general, and administrative expenses
Warehousing, delivery, selling, general, and administrative expenses,
same-store
Restructuring and other charges
$
614.7
13.9 % $ 481.4
14.3 % $
133.3
27.7 %
$
$
548.4
4.2
13.5 % $ 481.4
0.1 % $ —
14.3 % $
$
—
67.0
4.2
13.9 %
—
Total operating expenses in 2018 were $137.5 million higher than in 2017 primarily due to the acquisition of CS&W on July 2, 2018, which increased
operating expenses by $66.3 million excluding restructuring charges. In addition, improved demand, higher employment levels, and general inflationary
factors impacted expenses with increases in the following categories:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Higher incentive compensation expense of $29.5 million;
higher salaries and wages of $11.9 million;
higher delivery expenses of $9.4 million, primarily due to the increase in tons sold in 2018;
higher facility expenses of $6.2 million, primarily due to higher operating supply costs and higher depreciation expense;
a restructuring charge of $4.2 million in 2018 related primarily to severance costs for corporate staff reductions and two facility closures;
higher sales expenses of $2.8 million; and
higher purchase consideration and other transaction costs of $2.6 million.
On a per ton basis, operating expenses increased to $273 per ton in 2018 from $241 per ton in 2017.
Operating Profit
Year Ended December 31,
Operating profit
$
139.2
3.2 % $
2018
$
% of Net
Sales
2017
$
% of Net
Sales
Dollar change
Percentage
change
($ in millions)
101.1
3.0 % $
38.1
37.7 %
Our operating profit increased in 2018 compared to 2017 primarily due to the increase in average selling price and tons sold discussed above.
33
Other Expenses
Year Ended December 31,
2018
$
% of Net
Sales
2017
$
% of Net
Sales
($ in millions)
Dollar
change
Percentage
change
Interest and other expense on debt
Other income and (expense), net
$
(99.2 )
76.7
(2.3 )% $
1.7
(91.0 )
6.6
(2.7 )% $
0.2
(8.2 )
70.1
9.0 %
1,062.1
Interest and other expense on debt increased in 2018 compared to 2017, primarily due to a higher level of credit facility borrowings outstanding
resulting from the acquisition of CS&W on July 2, 2018, from increased working capital requirements, and higher interest rates on credit facility
borrowings in 2018. The other income in 2018 includes a $70.0 million gain on the bargain purchase of CS&W, a $6.2 million credit from net periodic
benefit cost other than service cost, and $2.5 million of foreign currency gains, partially offset by a $1.7 million loss on the redemption of debt. The other
income in 2017 was primarily related to an $8.9 million credit from net periodic benefit cost other than service cost, partially offset by foreign currency
losses.
Provision for Income Taxes
The $10.3 million income tax provision in 2018 primarily represents taxes at federal and local statutory rates where the Company operates, but
generally excludes any tax benefit for losses in jurisdictions with historical losses. During 2018, the Company recorded benefits of $1.3 million and $3.6
million to reduce valuation allowances previously recorded against certain foreign deferred tax assets and state net operating losses, respectively. This
benefit was offset by additional tax expense of $1.5 million from the revaluation of deferred tax assets and liabilities at our new state tax rates resulting
from our recent acquisition of CS&W. The effective tax rate for 2018 also reflects the reduced federal corporate income tax rate as a result of the
enactment of the U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“Tax Cuts and Jobs Act”) in December 2017.
The Company’s provision for income taxes in the fourth quarter of 2017 included $7.2 million of estimated tax expense related to the one-time
deemed repatriation transition tax (“Transition Tax”). An additional $0.4 million of expense was recorded in 2018 as we refined our calculations. Of the
$7.6 million of estimated tax expense, $0.9 million was reflected in our deferred tax balances and $6.7 million was reflected in income taxes payable. Please
refer to Note 17 — “Income Taxes” of Part II, Item 8 “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” for further information on the impact of the Tax Cuts
and Jobs Act.
Noncontrolling Interest
In both 2018 and 2017, Ryerson China’s results of operations was income and the portion attributable to the noncontrolling interest was $0.4
million and $0.9 million, respectively.
Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share was $2.84 in 2018 and $0.46 in 2017. Diluted earnings per share was $2.81 in 2018 and $0.46 in 2017. The changes in
earnings per share are due to the results of operations discussed above.
34
Comparison of the year ended December 31, 2017 with the year ended December 31, 2016
Net Sales
Net sales
$
3,364.7 $
2,859.7
$
505.0
17.7 %
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
($ in millions)
Dollar
change
Percentage
change
Tons sold
2,000
1,903
97
5.1 %
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
(in thousands)
Tons
change
Percentage
change
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
Price
change
Percentage
change
Average selling price per ton sold
$
1,682 $
1,503
$
179
11.9 %
Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2017 increased from the year ended December 31, 2016 due to higher average selling prices and higher
tons sold. Average selling price increased in 2017 from the price levels in 2016 reflecting improved economic conditions in the metals market. Average
selling price increased for all of our product lines in the year ended December 31, 2017 with the largest increases in our carbon flat, stainless flat, and
stainless plate products. Tons sold increased in 2017 with the largest increases in shipments in our stainless long, aluminum flat, and carbon plate
product lines. Tons sold per ship day were 7,968 in 2017 as compared to 7,552 in 2016.
Cost of Materials Sold
Cost of materials sold
$
2,782.2
82.7 % $
2,289.1
80.0 % $
493.1
21.5 %
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
$
% of Net
Sales
$
% of Net
Sales
Dollar
change
Percentage
change
($ in millions)
Average cost of materials per ton sold
Year Ended December 31,
Cost
Percentage
2017
2016
change
change
$
1,391
$
1,203
$
188
15.6 %
The increase in cost of materials sold in 2017 compared to 2016 was primarily due to an increase in the average cost of materials sold per ton and
the increase in tons sold. The average cost of materials sold for our carbon flat, carbon plate, and stainless flat product lines increased more than our
other products during 2017, which was a faster increase than the increase in average selling price per ton for these products.
During 2017, LIFO expense was $44 million related to increases in pricing for all product lines. During 2016, LIFO expense was $7 million related to
increases in pricing for carbon products. In 2017, we recorded income of $24 million to adjust the lower of cost or market inventory reserve compared to
income of $14 million in 2016.
Gross Profit
Year Ended December 31,
Gross profit
$
582.5
17.3 % $
2017
$
% of Net
Sales
2016
$
% of Net
Sales
Dollar change
Percentage
change
($ in millions)
570.6
20.0 % $
11.9
2.1 %
Gross profit dollars increased in 2017 compared to 2016, but gross profit as a percentage of sales decreased to 17.3% in 2017 compared to 20.0% in
2016 as a competitive pricing environment combined with increasing commodity prices compressed gross profit margin. While our revenue per ton
increased in 2017 as compared to 2016, cost of materials sold per ton increased at a faster pace, resulting in lower gross margins.
35
Operating Expenses
Year Ended December 31,
2017
$
% of Net
Sales
2016
% of Net
$
Sales
($ in millions)
Dollar
change
Percentage
change
Warehousing, delivery, selling, general, and administrative expenses
Restructuring and other charges
$
481.4
—
14.3 % $ 447.5
1.0
$
—
15.7 % $
$
—
33.9
(1.0 )
7.6 %
(100.0 )
Operating expenses in 2017 were higher than in 2016 primarily due to the following reasons:
•
•
•
•
•
Higher salaries and wages of $10.3 million resulting mainly from an increase in headcount after the acquisitions of Laserflex and Guy Metals
in 2017;
higher facility expenses of $8.0 million, primarily due to higher depreciation expense and higher operating supply costs;
higher delivery expenses of $7.8 million, primarily due to the increase in tons sold in 2017;
higher employee benefit costs of $5.7 million in 2017, primarily due to higher medical expenses; and
higher sales expenses of $2.4 million.
These changes were partially offset by:
•
Lower incentive compensation expense of $3.2 million.
On a per ton basis, operating expenses increased to $241 per ton in 2017 from $236 per ton in 2016
Operating Profit
Year Ended December 31,
Operating profit
$
101.1
3.0 % $
2017
$
% of Net
Sales
2016
$
% of Net
Sales
Dollar change
Percentage
change
($ in millions)
122.1
4.3 % $
(21.0 )
(17.2 )%
Our operating profit decreased in 2017 compared to 2016 primarily due to the decrease in gross margin as a percent of sales discussed above.
Other Expenses
Year Ended December 31,
2017
$
% of Net
Sales
2016
$
% of Net
Sales
($ in millions)
Dollar
change
Percentage
change
Interest and other expense on debt
Other income and (expense), net
$
(91.0 )
6.6
(2.7 )% $
0.2
(89.9 )
(6.1 )
(3.1 )% $
(0.3 )
(1.1 )
12.7
1.2 %
(208.2 )
Interest and other expense on debt increased in 2017 compared to 2016 as the interest rate on a portion of our outstanding Notes increased after
we redeemed the $569.9 million outstanding balance of our 9.00% Senior Notes due 2017 (the “2017 Notes”), repurchased $121.9 million and thereafter
redeemed the remaining outstanding $48.5 million of our 11.25% Senior Notes due 2018 (the “2018 Notes”), and issued $650.0 million of new 11.00%
Senior Notes due 2022 (the “2022 Notes”) in 2016, partially offset by a reduction in the amount of our outstanding Notes and lower amortization of debt
issuance costs expense. The other income in 2017 was primarily related to an $8.9 million credit from net periodic benefit cost other than service cost,
partially offset by foreign currency losses. The other expense in 2016 was primarily related to a $8.7 million net loss on debt redemptions, a $4.7 million
charge due to an other-than-temporary impairment recognized on an equity investment, and foreign currency losses of $3.9 million, partially offset by a
credit of $11.1 million from net periodic benefit cost other than service cost.
Provision for Income Taxes
The $1.3 million income tax benefit in 2017 includes tax expense on earnings in the U.S. and changes in our valuation allowances, adjusted for the
impact of certain one-time items associated with the U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Act”) passed on
36
December 22, 2017. These one-time adjustments included a benefit for the revaluation of our deferred tax assets of $10.6 million and the tax associated
with the deemed repatriation of foreign earnings of $7.2 million under the Act. The $7.2 million income tax expense in 2016 results predominantly from tax
expense on earnings in the U.S. and the inability to benefit losses in our foreign subsidiaries due to valuation allowances.
The Company’s 2017 provision for income taxes included $7.2 million of estimated tax expense related to the one-time deemed repatriation
transition tax (“Transition Tax”). Of the $7.2 million of estimated tax expense, $0.5 million is reflected in our deferred tax balances and $6.7 million is
reflected in income taxes payable. We chose to include an estimate of the Transition Tax in 2017 due to the complex nature of the calculation and the
short amount of time between passing of the legislation and the filing of our financial statements. Please refer to Note 17 — “Income Taxes” of Part II,
Item 8 “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” for further information on the impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.
Noncontrolling Interest
In 2017, Ryerson China’s results of operations was income and the portion attributable to the noncontrolling interest was $0.9 million. In 2016,
Ryerson China’s results of operations was income partially offset by a loss at our Brazil operations through Açofran Aços e Metais Ltda (“Açofran”) in
which we had a 50% direct ownership percentage, until we substantially liquidated our investment in Acofran during 2016. The portion of Ryerson
China’s and Açofran’s results attributable to the noncontrolling interest in 2016 was income of $0.2 million.
Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share was $0.46 in 2017 and $0.55 in 2016. Diluted earnings per share was $0.46 in 2017 and $0.54 in 2016. The changes in
earnings per share are due to the results of operations discussed above as well as an increase in the weighted average shares outstanding after the
issuance of 5 million shares of common stock in an underwritten public offering in July 2016.
The Company’s primary sources of liquidity are cash and cash equivalents, cash flows from operations, and borrowing availability under the $1.0
billion revolving credit facility (the “Ryerson Credit Facility”) that matures on November 16, 2021. Its principal source of operating cash is from the sale of
metals and other materials. Its principal uses of cash are for payments associated with the procurement and processing of metals and other materials
inventories, costs incurred for the warehousing and delivery of inventories and the selling and administrative costs of the business, capital expenditures,
and for interest payments on debt.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The following table summarizes the Company’s cash flows:
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
Net cash used in investing activities
Net cash provided by financing activities
Effect of exchange rates on cash
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
2018
Year Ended December 31,
2017
(In millions)
2016
$
$
57.4 $
(200.2 )
92.9
(4.3 )
(54.2 ) $
(2.5 ) $
(70.3 )
65.7
3.9
(3.2 ) $
24.8
(19.8 )
11.4
0.9
17.3
The Company had cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2018 of $23.2 million, compared to $77.4 million at December 31, 2017, and $80.7
million at December 31, 2016. The Company had $1,153 million, $1,046 million, and $964 million of total debt outstanding, a debt-to-capitalization ratio of
94%, 101%, and 105%, and $392 million, $264 million, and $225 million available under the Ryerson Credit Facility at December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016,
respectively. The Company had total liquidity (defined as cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, and availability under the Ryerson Credit
Facility and foreign debt facilities) of $441 million, $338 million, and $301 million at December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. Total liquidity is not a
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) financial measure. We believe that total liquidity provides additional information for measuring
our ability to fund our operations. Total liquidity does not represent, and should not be used as a substitute for, net income or cash flows from
operations as determined in accordance with GAAP and total liquidity is not necessarily an indication of whether cash flow will be sufficient to fund our
cash requirements.
37
Below is a reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents to total liquidity:
Cash and cash equivalents
Less: Qualified cash pledged as collateral
Availability under Ryerson Credit Facility and foreign debt facilities
Total liquidity
December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
(In millions)
$
$
23 $
—
418
441 $
77 $
(28 )
289
338 $
81
(31 )
251
301
Of the total cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2018, $12 million was held in subsidiaries outside the United States which is deemed to
be permanently reinvested. Ryerson does not currently foresee a need to repatriate funds from its non-U.S. subsidiaries. Although the Company has
historically satisfied needs for more capital in the U.S. through debt or equity issuances, it could elect to repatriate funds held in foreign jurisdictions
which could result in higher effective tax rates. The Company has not recorded a deferred tax liability for the effect of a possible repatriation of these
assets as management intends to permanently reinvest these assets outside of the U.S. Specific plans for reinvestment include funding for future
international acquisitions and funding of existing international operations.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $57.4 million in 2018 compared to net cash used in operating activities of $2.5 million in 2017 and net
cash provided by operating activities of $24.8 million in 2016. Net income was $106.4 million, $18.0 million, and $18.9 million in 2018, 2017, and 2016
respectively. Cash provided by operating activities of $57.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2018 was primarily due to the net income of $106.4
million, an increase in accounts payable of $58.4 million reflecting a higher cost of materials purchased at year-end 2018 compared to year-end 2017, and
non-cash depreciation and amortization expense of $52.9 million, partially offset by a non-cash gain on the bargain purchase of CS&W of $70.0 million, an
increase in accounts receivable of $64.8 million resulting from higher sales levels at year-end 2018 compared to year-end 2017, and pension contributions
of $27.0 million. Cash used in operating activities of $2.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2017 was primarily due to an increase in accounts
receivable of $44.0 million resulting from higher sales levels at year-end 2017 compared to year-end 2016, an increase in inventory of $42.9 million
reflecting higher material costs in 2017, pension contributions of $21.7 million, an increase in deferred income taxes of $9.2 million, and the payment of $7.9
million of retiree medical costs, partially offset by an increase in accounts payable of $58.1 million reflecting a higher cost of materials purchased at year-
end 2017 compared to year-end 2016, non-cash depreciation and amortization expense of $47.1 million, and net income of $18.0 million. Cash provided by
operating activities of $24.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2016 was primarily due to non-cash depreciation and amortization expense of
$42.5 million, an increase in accounts payable of $20.4 million, and net income of $18.9 million, partially offset by an increase in accounts receivable of
$22.5 million, pension contributions of $22.1 million, and premiums and fees related to debt modification of $15.7 million.
Net cash used in investing activities was $200.2 million, $70.3 million, and $19.8 million in 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. During 2018 we paid
$169.7 million, net of cash acquired, to purchase CS&W and Fanello Industries. During 2017 the Company paid $49.2 million, net of cash acquired, to
acquire all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of The Laserflex Corporation and Guy Metals, Inc. Capital expenditures for the years ended
December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016, were $38.4 million, $25.1 million, and $23.0 million, respectively. The Company sold property, plant, and equipment and
assets held for sale generating cash proceeds of $5.9 million, $3.8 million, and $3.2 million during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016,
respectively.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $92.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. In 2018, net cash provided by financing
activities was primarily due to an increase in credit facility borrowings of $149.9 million, largely to finance the acquisitions of CS&W and Fanello
Industries, an increase in book overdrafts of $6.3 million, and proceeds of $4.5 million from sale-leaseback transactions, partially offset by a $52.2 million
repurchase of the 2022 Notes, and $13.7 million of principal payments under capital lease obligations. Net cash provided by financing activities was $65.7
million for the year ended December 31, 2017. In 2017, net cash provided by financing activities was primarily related to net proceeds of $74.3 million from
credit facility borrowings and proceeds of $24.9 million from sale leaseback transactions, partially offset by a $18.0 million net decrease in book overdrafts
and $14.4 million of principle payments under capital lease obligations. Net cash provided by financing activities was $11.4 million for the year ended
December 31, 2016. In 2016, net cash provided by financing activities was primarily related to the issuance of the 2022 Notes with a principle amount of
$650.0 million, net proceeds of $71.5 million from the issuance of common stock, and $37.0 million from an increase in credit facility borrowings, partially
offset by the redemption of the $569.9 million outstanding balance of the 2017 Notes and $170.4 million of the 2018 Notes.
As market conditions warrant and subject to our contractual restrictions, liquidity position, and other factors, we may from time to time seek to
repurchase or retire our outstanding debt through cash purchases and/or exchanges for other debt or equity securities in open market transactions,
privately negotiated transactions, by tender offer, or otherwise. Any such cash repurchases by us may be funded by cash on hand or incurring new debt.
The amounts involved in any such transactions, individually or in the aggregate, may
38
be material. Furthermore, any such repurchases or exchanges may result in our acquiring and retiring a substantial amount of such indebtedness, which
would impact the trading liquidity of such indebtedness.
Total Debt
Total debt at December 31, 2018 increased $107.6 million to $1,153.3 million from $1,045.7 million at December 31, 2017 as a result of acquisitions
and capital expenditures during the year, funded by the Ryerson Credit Facility.
Total debt outstanding as of December 31, 2018 consisted of the following amounts: $535.9 million borrowing under the Ryerson Credit Facility,
$599.5 million under the 2022 Notes, $19.5 million of foreign debt, and $8.3 million of other debt, less $9.9 million of unamortized debt issuance costs.
Availability under the Ryerson Credit Facility was $392 million and $264 million at December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively. Discussion of
our outstanding debt follows.
Ryerson Credit Facility
On November 16, 2016, Ryerson entered into an amendment with respect to its $1.0 billion revolving credit facility (as amended, the “Old Credit
Facility”), to reduce the total facility size from $1.0 billion to $750 million, reduce the interest rate on outstanding borrowings by 25 basis points, reduce
commitment fees on amounts not borrowed by 2.5 basis points, and to extend the maturity date to November 16, 2021. On June 28, 2018, Ryerson entered
into a second amendment with respect to the Old Credit Facility to increase the facility size from $750 million to $1.0 billion (the Old Credit Facility as
amended, the “Ryerson Credit Facility”).
At December 31, 2018, Ryerson had $535.9 million of outstanding borrowings, $12 million of letters of credit issued, and $392 million available
under the Ryerson Credit Facility compared to $384.2 million of outstanding borrowings, $12 million of letters of credit issued, and $264 million available
at December 31, 2017. Total credit availability is limited by the amount of eligible accounts receivable, inventory, and qualified cash pledged as collateral
under the agreement insofar as Ryerson is subject to a borrowing base comprised of the aggregate of these three amounts, less applicable reserves.
Eligible accounts receivable, at any date of determination, is comprised of the aggregate value of all accounts directly created by a borrower (and in the
case of Canadian accounts, the Canadian borrower) in the ordinary course of business arising out of the sale of goods or the rendering of services, each
of which has been invoiced, with such receivables adjusted to exclude various ineligible accounts, including, among other things, those to which a
borrower (or guarantor, as applicable) does not have sole and absolute title and accounts arising out of a sale to an employee, officer, director, or affiliate
of a borrower (or guarantor, as applicable). Eligible inventory, at any date of determination, is comprised of the net orderly liquidation value of all
inventory owned by a borrower (and in the case of Canadian accounts, the Canadian borrower). Qualified cash consists of cash in an eligible deposit
account that is subject to customary restrictions and liens in favor of the lenders.
The Ryerson Credit Facility has an allocation of $940 million to the Company’s subsidiaries in the United States and an allocation of $60 million to
Ryerson Holding’s Canadian subsidiary that is a borrower. Amounts outstanding under the Ryerson Credit Facility bear interest at (i) a rate determined
by reference to (A) the base rate (the highest of the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50%, Bank of America, N.A.’s prime rate, and the one-month LIBOR rate
plus 1.00%), or (B) a LIBOR rate or, (ii) for Ryerson Holding’s Canadian subsidiary that is a borrower, (A) a rate determined by reference to the Canadian
base rate (the greatest of the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50%, Bank of America-Canada Branch’s “base rate” for commercial loans in U.S. Dollars made at
its “base rate”, and the 30 day LIBOR rate plus 1.00%), (B) the prime rate (the greater of Bank of America-Canada Branch’s “prime rate” for commercial
loans made by it in Canada in Canadian Dollars and the one-month Canadian bankers’ acceptance rate plus 1.00%), or (C) the bankers’ acceptance rate.
The spread over the base rate and prime rate is between 0.25% and 0.50% and the spread over the LIBOR for the bankers’ acceptances is between 1.25%
and 1.50%, depending on the amount available to be borrowed under the Ryerson Credit Facility. Overdue amounts and all amounts owed during the
existence of a default bear interest at 2% above the rate otherwise applicable thereto. Ryerson also pays commitment fees on amounts not borrowed at a
rate of 0.23%.
We attempt to minimize interest rate risk exposure through the utilization of interest rate swaps, which are derivative financial instruments. During
March 2017, we entered into an interest rate swap to fix interest on $150 million of our floating rate debt under the Ryerson Credit Facility at a rate of
1.658% through March 2020. The swap has reset dates and critical terms that match our existing debt and the anticipated critical terms of future debt. The
weighted average interest rate on the outstanding borrowings under the Ryerson Credit Facility including the interest rate swap was 3.5 percent and 2.8
percent at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Borrowings under the Ryerson Credit Facility are secured by first-priority liens on all of the inventory, accounts receivables, lockbox accounts,
and related assets of the borrowers and the guarantors.
39
The Ryerson Credit Facility also contains covenants that, among other things, restrict Ryerson Holding and its restricted subsidiaries with respect
to the incurrence of debt, the creation of liens, transactions with affiliates, mergers and consolidations, sales of assets, and acquisitions. The Ryerson
Credit Facility also requires that, if availability under the Ryerson Credit Facility declines to a certain level, Ryerson maintain a minimum fixed charge
coverage ratio as of the end of each fiscal quarter, and includes defaults upon (among other things) the occurrence of a change of control of Ryerson and
a cross-default to other financing arrangements.
The Ryerson Credit Facility contains events of default with respect to, among other things, default in the payment of principal when due or the
payment of interest, fees, and other amounts due thereunder after a specified grace period, material misrepresentations, failure to perform certain specified
covenants, certain bankruptcy events, the invalidity of certain security agreements or guarantees, material judgments, and the occurrence of a change of
control of Ryerson. If such an event of default occurs, the lenders under the Ryerson Credit Facility will be entitled to various remedies, including
acceleration of amounts outstanding under the Ryerson Credit Facility and all other actions permitted to be taken by secured creditors.
The lenders under the Ryerson Credit Facility could reject a borrowing request if any event, circumstance, or development has occurred that has
had or could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company. If Ryerson Holding, JT Ryerson, any of the other borrowers, or
any restricted subsidiaries of JT Ryerson becomes insolvent or commences bankruptcy proceedings, all amounts borrowed under the Ryerson Credit
Facility will become immediately due and payable.
Net proceeds of short-term borrowings that are reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows represent borrowings under the Ryerson
Credit Facility with original maturities less than three months.
2022 Notes
On May 24, 2016, JT Ryerson issued $650 million in aggregate principal amount of the 2022 Notes (the “2022 Notes”). The 2022 Notes bear
interest at a rate of 11.00% per annum. The 2022 Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a senior secured basis by all of our existing and future
domestic subsidiaries that are co-borrowers or that have guarantee obligations under the Ryerson Credit Facility.
The 2022 Notes and the related guarantees are secured by a first-priority security interest in substantially all of JT Ryerson’s and each
guarantor’s present and future assets located in the United States (other than receivables, inventory, cash, deposit accounts and related general
intangibles, certain other assets, and proceeds thereof), subject to certain exceptions and customary permitted liens. The 2022 Notes and the related
guarantees are also secured on a second-priority basis by a lien on the assets that secure JT Ryerson’s and the Company’s obligations under the
Ryerson Credit Facility.
The 2022 Notes will be redeemable, in whole or in part, at any time on or after May 15, 2019 at certain redemption prices. The redemption price for
the 2022 Notes if redeemed during the twelve months beginning (i) May 15, 2019 is 105.50%, (ii) May 15, 2020 is 102.75%, and (iii) May 15, 2021 and
thereafter is 100.00%. JT Ryerson may redeem some or all of the 2022 Notes before May 15, 2019 at a redemption price of 100.00% of the principal amount,
plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption date, plus a “make-whole” premium. In addition, JT Ryerson may redeem up to 35% of the 2022
Notes before May 15, 2019 with respect to the 2022 Notes with the net cash proceeds from certain equity offerings at a price equal to 111.00%, with
respect to the 2022 Notes, of the principal amount thereof, plus any accrued and unpaid interest, if any. JT Ryerson may be required to make an offer to
purchase the 2022 Notes upon the sale of assets or upon a change of control.
The 2022 Notes contain customary covenants that, among other things, limit, subject to certain exceptions, our ability, and the ability of our
restricted subsidiaries, to incur additional indebtedness, pay dividends on our capital stock or repurchase our capital stock, make investments, sell
assets, engage in acquisitions, mergers or consolidations, create liens, or use assets as security in other transactions. Subject to certain exceptions, JT
Ryerson may only pay dividends to Ryerson Holding to the extent of 50% of cumulative net income since the issuance of the 2022 Notes, once prior
losses are offset.
During 2018, a principal amount of $50.5 million of the 2022 Notes were repurchased for $52.2 million and retired, resulting in the recognition of a
$1.7 million loss within other income and (expense), net on the Consolidated Statement of Operations.
The net proceeds from the issuance of the 2022 Notes, along with borrowings under the Ryerson Credit Facility, were used to (i) repurchase
and/or redeem in full the $569.9 million balance of JT Ryerson’s 9.00% Senior Secured Notes due 2017 (the “2017 Notes”), plus accrued and unpaid
interest thereon up to, but not including, the repayment date, (ii) repurchase $95.0 million of JT Ryerson’s 11.25% Senior Secured Notes due 2018 (the
“2018 Notes”), and (iii) pay related fees, expenses, and premiums.
The Company applied the provisions of ASC 470-50, “Modifications and Extinguishments” in accounting for the issuance of the 2022 Notes,
redemption of the 2017 Notes, and partial repurchase of the 2018 Notes. The evaluation of the accounting under ASC
40
470-50 was performed on a creditor by creditor basis in order to determine if the terms of the debt were substantially different and, as a result, whether to
apply modification or extinguishment accounting. For the lenders where it was determined that the terms of the debt were not substantially different,
modification accounting was applied. For the remaining lenders, extinguishment accounting was applied. In connection with this debt modification and
extinguishment, the Company recorded a $16.1 million loss within other income and (expense), net on the Consolidated Statement of Operations during
2016, primarily attributed to the costs incurred with third parties for arrangement fees, legal, and other services related to the modified debt, as well as
redemption fees paid to the creditors, and unamortized debt issuance costs written off related to the extinguished debt. Additionally, the costs incurred
with third parties for arrangement fees, legal, and other services related to the extinguished debt and redemption fees paid to the creditors related to the
modified debt were capitalized and are being amortized over the life of the modified debt using the effective interest method.
During 2016, a principal amount of $75.4 million of the 2018 Notes were repurchased for $68.0 million and retired, resulting in the recognition of a
$7.4 million gain within other income and (expense), net on the Consolidated Statement of Operations. Including the $16.1 million loss on the redemption
of the $569.9 million balance of the 2017 Notes and repurchase of $95.0 million of the 2018 Notes, the Company recognized a total net loss of $8.7 million
within other income and (expense), net on the Consolidated Statement of Operations during year 2016.
Foreign Debt
At December 31, 2018, Ryerson China’s total foreign borrowings were $19.5 million, which were owed to banks in Asia at a weighted average
interest rate of 4.3% per annum and secured by inventory and property, plant, and equipment. At December 31, 2017, Ryerson China’s total foreign
borrowings were $21.3 million, which were owed to banks in Asia at a weighted average interest rate of 3.7% per annum and secured by inventory and
property, plant, and equipment.
Availability under Ryerson China’s credit facility was $26 million and $25 million at December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively. Letters
of credit issued by our foreign subsidiaries totaled $3 million at December 31, 2018 and 2017.
Pension Funding
The Company made contributions of $27.0 million in 2018, $21.7 million in 2017, and $22.1 million in 2016 to improve the Company’s pension plans
funded status. At December 31, 2018, as reflected in Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, pension liabilities exceeded plan assets by $181
million. The Company anticipates that it will have a minimum required pension contribution of approximately $26 million in 2019 under the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), Pension Protection Act in the U.S., and the Ontario Pension Benefits Act in Canada. Future
contribution requirements depend on the investment returns on plan assets, the impact of discount rates on pension liabilities, and changes in regulatory
requirements. The Company is unable to determine the amount or timing of any such contributions required by ERISA or whether any such contributions
would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or cash flows. The Company believes that cash flow from operations and the
Ryerson Credit Facility described above will provide sufficient funds to make the minimum required contribution in 2019.
The Company made income tax payments of $2.1 million, $1.7 million, and $1.8 million in 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively.
Income Tax Payments
In the normal course of business with customers, vendors, and others, we have entered into off-balance sheet arrangements, such as letters of
credit, which totaled $15 million as of December 31, 2018. Additionally, other than normal course long-term operating leases included in the following
Contractual Obligations table, we do not have any material off-balance sheet financing arrangements. None of these off-balance sheet arrangements are
likely to have a material effect on our current or future financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, or capital resources.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
41
The following table presents contractual obligations at December 31, 2018:
Contractual Obligations
Contractual Obligations(1)(2)
2022 Notes
Ryerson Credit Facility
Foreign Debt
Other Debt
Interest on 2022 Notes, Foreign Debt, Other Debt, and Ryerson Credit Facility(3)
Purchase Obligations(4)
Operating Leases
Pension Withdrawal Liability
Capital Leases
Transition Tax Liability
$
Total
$
Payments Due by Period
Total
Less than
1 year
1 – 3
years
(In millions)
4 – 5
years
600 $
536
19
8
279
12
102
1
34
7
1,598 $
— $
—
19
8
85
12
22
—
14
1
161 $
— $
536
—
—
169
—
36
—
17
1
759 $
600 $
—
—
—
25
—
24
—
3
1
653 $
After
5
years
—
—
—
—
—
—
20
1
—
4
25
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
The contractual obligations disclosed above do not include our potential future pension funding obligations (see previous discussion under “ Pension Funding” caption).
Due to uncertainty regarding the completion of tax audits and possible outcomes, we do not know the timing of when our obligations related to unrecognized tax benefits
will occur, if at all. See Note 17 “ Income Taxes” of the notes to our consolidated financial statements for additional detail.
Interest payments related to the variable rate debt were estimated using the weighted average interest rate for the Ryerson Credit Facility, including the effect of the
interest rate swap.
The purchase obligations with suppliers are entered into when we receive firm sales commitments with certain of our customers.
Capital expenditures during 2018, 2017, and 2016 totaled $38.4 million, $25.1 million, and $23.0 million, respectively. Capital expenditures were
primarily for machinery and equipment.
The Company anticipates capital expenditures, excluding acquisitions, to be approximately $35 million in 2019. The spending includes maintenance
expenditures and improvements to maintain, upgrade, and add to the Company’s North American processing capabilities.
Capital Expenditures
Restructuring
2018
In 2018, the Company recorded a $3.6 million charge for employee-related costs primarily for severance costs for corporate staff reductions and
two facility closures. The Company paid $3.2 million of the employee costs related to these actions. The remaining $0.4 million of employee-related costs
are expected to be paid in 2019.
During 2018, the Company also recorded a $0.6 million charge to increase the reserve for tenancy-related costs for a facility closed in 2013. The
Company paid $0.8 million in costs related to this facility closure. The remaining $1.5 million of tenancy-related costs are expected to be paid through
2025.
2017
In 2017, the Company recorded an $0.8 million charge in warehousing, delivery, selling, general, and administrative expense in the Consolidated
Statements of Operations to increase the reserve for tenancy-related costs for a facility closed in 2013. The Company paid $0.4 million in costs related to
this facility closure and also reclassified an existing $0.1 million liability for future lease payments to the restructuring reserve. In addition, the Company
paid $0.1 million in costs related to a facility closed in 2016.
42
During 2017, the Company recorded a $0.2 million reduction to the reserve for employee-related costs and credited warehousing, delivery,
selling, general, and administrative expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. This action fully utilized the remaining reserve for employee-
related costs.
2016
In 2016, the Company recorded a charge of $1.0 million related to a facility closure, which consists of tenancy-related costs, primarily future
lease payments. The Company paid $0.2 million in costs related to this facility closure and also reclassified an existing $0.2 million liability for future lease
payments at this facility to the restructuring reserve. The Company also paid $0.3 million in costs related to a facility closed in 2013 and recorded an
addition of $0.1 million to the reserve for tenancy-related costs, which was charged to warehousing, delivery, selling, general, and administrative expense
in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
During 2016, the Company paid $0.7 million in employee-related costs related to restructuring actions taken in the fourth quarter of 2015. The
Company also recorded a $0.3 million reduction to the reserve for employee-related costs and credited warehousing, delivery, selling, general, and
administrative expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Deferred Tax Amounts
At December 31, 2018, the Company had a net deferred tax liability of $13 million comprised primarily of a deferred tax asset of $48 million
related to pension liabilities, a deferred tax asset related to postretirement benefits other than pensions of $18 million, $30 million of Alternative Minimum
Tax (“AMT”) credit carryforwards, and deferred tax assets of $71 million related to federal, local, and foreign tax loss carryforwards, offset by a valuation
allowance of $29 million and deferred tax liabilities of $65 million related to fixed assets and $127 million related to inventory. The Company’s deferred tax
assets include $46 million related to U.S. federal net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards, $20 million related to state NOL carryforwards, and $5 million
related to foreign NOL carryforwards, available at December 31, 2018.
The U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Act”), enacted on December 22, 2017, significantly changed U.S. corporate income tax laws by, among
other things, reducing the U.S. corporate income tax rate to 21% starting in 2018 and creating a territorial tax system with a one-time mandatory tax on
previously deferred foreign earnings of U.S. subsidiaries. Under ASC Topic 740, “Income Taxes” the effects of changes in tax rates and laws on deferred
tax balances are recognized in the period in which the new legislation is enacted. As a result of the Act, we recorded a benefit for the revaluation of our
deferred tax assets of $10.6 million during the fourth quarter of 2017 within the provision (benefit) for income taxes line of the Consolidated Statement of
Operations.
In accordance with ASC 740 the Company assesses the realizability of its deferred tax assets. The Company records a valuation allowance
when, based upon the evaluation of all available evidence, it is more-likely-than-not that all or a portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. In
making this determination, we analyze, among other things, our recent history of earnings, the nature and timing of reversing book-tax temporary
differences, tax planning strategies, and future income. After considering both the positive and negative evidence available, in the second quarter of
2009, the Company determined that it was more-likely-than-not that it would not realize a portion of its U.S. deferred tax assets. As a result, the Company
established a valuation allowance against a portion of its U.S. deferred tax assets. The Company released a portion of the valuation allowance related to
one of its U.S. subsidiaries, JT Ryerson, during 2012. The Company released most of the remaining U.S. related valuation allowance during 2013. In 2018,
the Company further reduced its valuation allowance related to state and foreign net operating losses. As of December 31, 2017, the Company had a
valuation allowance of $24.4 million. As of December 31, 2018, the Company had a valuation allowance of $29.3 million, an increase of $4.9 million from the
prior year mainly related to changes in foreign deferred tax assets, U.S. foreign tax credits, and state net operating losses subject to valuation allowances.
As described in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company assesses the need for a valuation allowance considering all
available positive and negative evidence, including past operating results, projections of future taxable income, and the feasibility of ongoing tax
planning strategies.
The Company will continue to maintain a valuation allowance on certain U.S. federal and state deferred tax assets until such time as in
management’s judgment, considering all available positive and negative evidence, the Company determines that these deferred tax assets are more likely
than not realizable.
Preparation of this Form 10-K requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our financial statements, and the reported amounts of sales and expenses during the reporting period. Our
critical accounting policies, including the assumptions and judgments underlying them, are
Critical Accounting Estimates
43
disclosed in Item 8 within Note 1: “Summary of Accounting and Financial Policies”. These policies have been consistently applied and address such
matters as revenue recognition, depreciation methods, inventory valuation, asset impairment recognition, and pension and postretirement expense. While
policies associated with estimates and judgments may be affected by different assumptions or conditions, we believe our estimates and judgments
associated with the reported amounts are appropriate in the circumstances. Actual results may differ from those estimates.
We consider the policies discussed below as critical to an understanding of our financial statements, as application of these policies places the
most significant demands on management’s judgment, with financial reporting results relying on estimation of matters that are uncertain.
Provision for allowances, claims, and doubtful accounts: We perform ongoing credit evaluations of customers and set credit limits based upon
review of the customers’ current credit information and payment history. We monitor customer payments and maintain a provision for estimated credit
losses based on historical experience and specific customer collection issues that we have identified. Estimation of such losses requires adjusting
historical loss experience for current economic conditions and judgments about the probable effects of economic conditions on certain customers. We
cannot guarantee that the rate of future credit losses will be similar to past experience. Provisions for allowances and claims are based upon historical
rates, expected trends, and estimates of potential returns, allowances, customer discounts, and incentives. We consider all available information when
assessing the adequacy of the provision for allowances, claims, and doubtful accounts.
Inventory valuation: Our inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. The valuation of our inventories at the lower of cost or market could
be subject to certain estimates; however the measurement is primarily based on historical purchasing and sales information rather than forecasted metals
pricing. Inventory costs reflect metal and in-bound freight purchase costs, third-party processing costs, and internal direct and allocated indirect
processing costs. Cost is primarily determined by the LIFO method. We regularly review inventory on hand and record provisions for obsolete and slow-
moving inventory based on historical and current sales trends. Changes in product demand and our customer base may affect the value of inventory on
hand which may require higher provisions for obsolete inventory.
Income Taxes: Our income tax expense, deferred tax assets and liabilities, and reserve for uncertain tax positions reflect our best estimate of taxes
to be paid. The Company is subject to income taxes in the U.S. and several foreign jurisdictions. The determination of the consolidated income tax
expense requires judgment and estimation by management. It is possible that actual results could differ from the estimates that management has used to
determine its consolidated income tax expense.
We record operating loss and tax credit carryforwards and the estimated effect of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and
liabilities and the reported amounts in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. We follow detailed guidelines in each tax jurisdiction when reviewing tax assets
recorded on the balance sheet and provide for valuation allowances as required. Deferred tax assets are reviewed for recoverability based on historical
taxable income, the expected reversals of existing temporary differences, tax planning strategies, and on forecasts of future taxable income. The forecasts
of future taxable income require assumptions regarding volume, selling prices, margins, expense levels, and industry cyclicality. If we are unable to
generate sufficient future taxable income in certain tax jurisdictions, we may be required to record additional valuation allowances against our deferred tax
assets related to those jurisdictions.
The Company’s income tax provisions are based on calculations and assumptions that are subject to examination by the IRS and other tax
authorities. Although the Company believes that the positions taken on filed tax returns are reasonable, it has established tax and interest reserves in
recognition that various taxing authorities may challenge the positions taken. For uncertain tax positions, the Company applies the provisions of relevant
authoritative guidance, which requires application of a “more likely than not” threshold to the recognition and derecognition of tax positions. The
Company’s ongoing assessments of the more likely than not outcomes of tax authority examinations and related tax positions require significant
judgment and can increase or decrease the Company’s effective tax rate.
Long-lived Assets and Other Intangible Assets: Long-lived assets held and used are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. We estimate the future cash flows expected to result from the use of
the asset and its eventual disposition. If the sum of the expected future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) is less than the carrying
amount of the asset, an impairment is recognized. Determining whether an impairment has occurred typically requires various estimates and assumptions,
including determining which undiscounted cash flows are directly related to the potentially impaired asset, the useful life over which cash flows will
occur, their amount, and the asset’s residual value, if any. Any related impairment loss is calculated based upon comparison of the fair value to the
carrying value of the asset. Separate intangible assets that have finite useful lives are amortized over their useful lives. An impaired long-lived or
intangible asset would be written down to fair value, based on various available valuation techniques, including the discounted cash flow method.
44
Goodwill: We assess the recoverability of the carrying value of recorded goodwill annually in the fourth quarter of each year or whenever
indicators of potential impairment exist. We test for impairment of goodwill by assessing various qualitative factors with respect to developments in our
business and the overall economy and calculating the fair value of a reporting unit using the discounted cash flow method, as necessary. Factors that
may be considered indicators of impairment include: deterioration in general economic conditions; declines in the market conditions of our products,
including metals prices; a sustained significant decline in our share price and market capitalization; reduced future cash flow estimates; and slower
growth rates in our industry, among others. If we determine that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than the carrying
value based on our qualitative assessment, we will proceed to the goodwill impairment test. We compare the fair value of the reporting unit in which
goodwill resides to its carrying value. If the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess,
not to exceed the carrying amount of the goodwill. The fair value of the reporting units is estimated using a combination of an income approach and a
market approach as this combination is deemed to be the most indicative of our fair value in an orderly transaction between market participants. An
income approach based on discounted future cash flows requires us to estimate income from operations based on projected results and discount rates
based on a weighted average cost of capital of comparable companies. A market approach estimates fair value using market multiples of various financial
measures of comparable public companies. If these estimates or their related assumptions for commodity prices and demand change in the future, we may
be required to record impairment charges for these assets.
Based on the impairment test performed as of October 1, 2015, the reporting unit’s fair value exceeded its carrying value by more than 25%. Based
on a qualitative assessment performed as of October 1, 2018, the Company concluded it was not more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting
unit was less than its carrying amount. Therefore, we did not perform the quantitative goodwill impairment test during 2018. The discount rate for the
reporting unit was estimated to be 14.5% at October 1, 2018. The Company determines a discount rate based on an estimate of a reasonable risk-adjusted
return an investor would expect to realize on an investment in the reporting unit. Deterioration in market conditions in our industry or products, changes
in expected future cash flows, expected growth rates, or discount rates could result in impairment charges in future periods.
Purchase Price Accounting: Business combinations are accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting. This method requires the
Company to record assets and liabilities of the business acquired at their estimated fair market values as of the acquisition date. Any excess of the cost of
the acquisition over the fair value of the net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. The Company uses valuation specialists, where necessary, to
perform appraisals and assist in the determination of the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. These valuations require management
to make estimates and assumptions that are critical in determining the fair values of the assets and liabilities.
Pension and postretirement benefit plan assumptions: We sponsor various benefit plans covering a portion of our employees for pension and
postretirement medical costs. Statistical methods are used to anticipate future events when calculating expenses and liabilities related to the plans. The
statistical methods include assumptions about, among other things, the discount rate, expected return on plan assets, rate of increase of health care
costs, and the rate of future compensation increases. Our actuarial consultants also use subjective factors such as withdrawal and mortality rates when
estimating expenses and liabilities. The discount rate used for U.S. plans reflects the market rate for high-quality fixed-income investments on our annual
measurement date (December 31) and is subject to change each year. The discount rate was determined by matching, on an approximate basis, the
coupons and maturities for a portfolio of corporate bonds (rated Aa or better by Moody’s Investor Services or AA or better by Standard and Poor’s) to
the expected plan benefit payments defined by the projected benefit obligation. The discount rates used for plans outside the U.S. are based on the yield
of long term high quality corporate bonds, the duration of the liability, and appropriate judgment.
When calculating pension expense for 2018, we assumed the pension plans’ assets would generate a long-term rate of return of 6.70% for the JT
Ryerson plan and 4.70% for the CS&W plan, and between 4.50% and 5.25% for the Canadian plans. The expected long-term rate of return assumption
was developed based on historical experience and input from the trustee managing the plans’ assets. The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets
is based on a target allocation of assets, which is based on a goal of earning the highest rate of return while maintaining risk at acceptable levels. Our
projected long-term rate of return for the JT Ryerson pension plan is slightly higher than some market indices due to the active management of our plans’
assets, and is supported by the historical returns on our plans’ assets. The plans strive to have assets sufficiently diversified so that adverse or
unexpected results from one security class will not have an unduly detrimental impact on the entire portfolio. We regularly review actual asset allocation
and the pension plans’ investments are periodically rebalanced to the targeted allocation when considered appropriate. Pension expense increases as the
expected rate of return on plan assets decreases. Lowering the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets by 50 basis points would have increased
2018 pension expense by approximately $3 million.
Future pension obligations for the U.S. plans were discounted using rates between of 4.32% and 4.59% at December 31, 2018. Future pension
obligations for the Canadian plans were discounted using weighted average rates between 3.56% and 3.58% at December 31, 2018. Lowering the discount
rate by 50 basis points would increase the pension liability at December 31, 2018 by approximately $42 million.
45
The calculation of other postretirement benefit expense and obligations requires the use of a number of assumptions, including the assumed
discount rate for measuring future payment obligations and the health care cost trend rate. A one percentage point increase (decrease) in assumed health
care trend rates would increase (decrease) our total service and interest cost for the year ended December 31, 2018 by $0.2 million and $(0.2) million,
respectively. A decrease in the weighted average discount rate of 50 basis points would increase the postretirement benefit liability by approximately $3
million.
The assumptions used in the actuarial calculation of expenses and liabilities may differ materially from actual results due to changing market and
economic conditions, higher or lower withdrawal rates, or longer or shorter life spans of participants. These differences may result in a significant impact
on the amount of pension or postretirement benefit expense we may record in the future.
Legal contingencies: We are involved in a number of legal and regulatory matters including those discussed in Note 11 in the Consolidated
Financial Statements. We determine whether an estimated loss from a loss contingency should be accrued by assessing whether a loss is deemed
probable and can be reasonably estimated. We analyze our legal matters based on available information to assess potential liability. We consult with
outside counsel involved in our legal matters when analyzing potential outcomes. We cannot determine at this time whether any potential liability related
to this litigation would materially affect our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
Recent accounting pronouncements are discussed within Note 1 in the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
ITEM 7A.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
Interest rate risk
Market risk is the potential loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices, such as interest rates. We are exposed to market risk
related to our fixed-rate and variable-rate long-term debt. Changes in interest rates may affect the market value of our fixed-rate debt. The estimated fair
value of our long-term debt and the current portions thereof using quoted market prices of Company debt securities recently traded and market-based
prices of similar securities for those securities not recently traded was $1,158.5 million at December 31, 2018 and $1,125.9 million at December 31, 2017 as
compared with the carrying value of $1,153.3 million and $1,045.7 million at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
We have a receive variable, pay fixed, interest rate swap to manage the exposure to variable interest rates of the Ryerson Credit Facility. In March
2017, we entered into a forward agreement for $150 million of “pay fixed” interest at 1.658%, “receive variable” interest to manage the risk of increasing
variable interest rates. We account for the interest rate swap as a cash flow hedge of floating-rate borrowings with changes in fair value being recorded
in accumulated other comprehensive income. The fair value of the interest rate swap as of December 31, 2018 was an asset of $1.5 million.
A hypothetical 1% increase in interest rates on variable rate debt would have increased interest expense in 2018 by approximately $4.0 million.
Foreign exchange rate risk
We are subject to exposure from fluctuations in foreign currencies. We use foreign currency exchange contracts to hedge variability in cash flows
when a payment currency is different from our functional currency. Foreign currency contracts are principally used to purchase U.S. dollars. We had
foreign currency contracts with a U.S. dollar notional amount of $4.5 million outstanding at December 31, 2018 and a net asset value of $0.2 million. We do
not currently account for these contracts as hedges but rather mark these contracts to market with a corresponding offset to current earnings. For the
year ended December 31, 2018, the Company recognized a gain of $0.2 million associated with its foreign currency contracts. A hypothetical
strengthening or weakening of 10% in the foreign exchange rates underlying the foreign currency contracts from the market rate as of December 31, 2018
would decrease or increase the fair value of the foreign currency contracts by $0.2 million and $0.1 million, respectively.
The currency effects of translating the financial statements of our foreign subsidiaries are included in accumulated other comprehensive loss and
will not be recognized in the statement of operations until there is a liquidation or sale of those foreign subsidiaries.
46
Commodity price risk
Metal prices can fluctuate significantly due to several factors including changes in foreign and domestic production capacity, raw material
availability, metals consumption, and foreign currency rates. Declining metal prices could reduce our revenues, gross profit, and net income. From time to
time, we may enter into fixed price sales contracts with our customers for certain of our inventory components. We may enter into metal commodity
futures and options contracts to reduce volatility in the price of these metals.
As of December 31, 2018, we had 1,541 tons of nickel swap contracts, 36,365 tons of hot roll coil swap contracts, and 42,419 tons of aluminum
swap contracts, with a net liability value of $0.6 million, $0.1 million, and $3.1 million, respectively. We do not currently account for these contracts as
hedges, but rather mark these contracts to market with a corresponding offset to current earnings. For the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company
recognized a loss of $3.1 million associated with its metal commodity derivatives.
A hypothetical strengthening or weakening of 10% in the commodity prices underlying the commodity derivative contracts from the market rate as
of December 31, 2018 would increase or decrease the fair value of the commodity derivative contracts by $3.7 million.
47
ITEM 8.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
Financial Statements
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2018 and 2017
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Financial Statements Schedule
I—Condensed Financial Information of Registrant
II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable. The required information is shown in the Financial Statements or
Notes thereto.
48
Page
49
50
52
53
54
55
56
57
93
98
MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
The management of Ryerson Holding Corporation (“the Company”) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting. The Company’s internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Company’s management and Board of
Directors regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements under all potential conditions.
Therefore, effective internal control over financial reporting provides only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance with respect to the preparation and
presentation of financial statements.
The Company’s management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on
criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013
framework) (the COSO criteria). Based on its assessment under that framework and the criteria established therein, the Company’s management
concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2018. Management’s assessment and conclusion
on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018 excludes the internal control over financial reporting related to
Central Steel and Wire Company (acquired on July 2, 2018). Central Steel and Wire Company is included in the 2018 consolidated financial statements and
constituted 13.2% and 4.9% of total assets and total liabilities, respectively, as of December 31, 2018 and 7.9% and 7.3% of net sales and pre-tax income,
respectively, for the year then ended.
Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2018, as stated in their report, which is included herein.
49
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Stockholders’ and the Board of Directors of Ryerson Holding Corporation
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Ryerson Holding Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31,
2018 and 2017, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years
in the period ended December 31, 2018, and the related notes and financial statement schedules listed in the Index at 15(a) (collectively referred to as the
“consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
the Company at December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December
31, 2018, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial
statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the
Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the
PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included
performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures
that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the
overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2006.
Chicago, Illinois
March 5, 2019
50
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Stockholders’ and the Board of Directors of Ryerson Holding Corporation
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited Ryerson Holding Corporation and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on criteria
established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013
framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, Ryerson Holding Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company) maintained, in all material respects,
effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on the COSO criteria.
As indicated in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, management’s assessment of and conclusion on
the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting did not include the internal controls of the Central Steel and Wire Company, which is
included in the 2018 consolidated financial statements of the Company and constituted 13.2% and 4.9% of total assets and total liabilities, respectively
as of December 31, 2018 and 7.9% and 7.3% of net sales and pre-tax income, respectively, for the year then ended. Our audit of internal control over
financial reporting of the Company also did not include an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of Central Steel and Wire Company.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the 2018
consolidated financial statements of the Company and our report dated March 5, 2019 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm
registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the
applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and
evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s
internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are
recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and
expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a
material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation
of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of
compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Chicago, Illinois
March 5, 2019
51
RYERSON HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In millions, except per share data)
Net sales
Cost of materials sold
Gross profit
Warehousing, delivery, selling, general, and
administrative
Restructuring and other charges
Operating profit
Other expense:
Other income and (expense), net
Interest and other expense on debt
Income before income taxes
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
Net income
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
Net income attributable to Ryerson Holding
Corporation
Basic earnings per share
Diluted earnings per share
2018
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
$
4,408.4 $
3,650.3
758.1
3,364.7 $
2,782.2
582.5
2,859.7
2,289.1
570.6
614.7
4.2
139.2
76.7
(99.2 )
116.7
10.3
106.4
0.4
106.0 $
2.84 $
2.81 $
481.4
—
101.1
6.6
(91.0 )
16.7
(1.3 )
18.0
0.9
17.1 $
0.46 $
0.46 $
447.5
1.0
122.1
(6.1 )
(89.9 )
26.1
7.2
18.9
0.2
18.7
0.55
0.54
$
$
$
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
52
RYERSON HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In millions)
Net income
Other comprehensive income (loss), before tax:
Foreign currency translation adjustments
Gain (loss) on intra-entity foreign currency transactions
Unrealized loss on equity securities
Other-than-temporary impairment on equity securities
Liquidation of investment in foreign entity
Gain on cash flow hedges
Changes in defined benefit pension and other
post-retirement benefit plans
Other comprehensive income (loss), before tax
Income tax provision (benefit) related to items of other
comprehensive income (loss)
Comprehensive income, after tax
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to the
noncontrolling interest
Comprehensive income attributable to Ryerson
Holding Corporation
2018
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
$
106.4 $
18.0 $
(8.2 )
(3.0 )
—
—
—
0.5
(22.3 )
(33.0 )
(4.5 )
77.9
0.4
5.6
3.2
(0.3 )
0.2
—
1.0
18.0
27.7
6.0
39.7
1.1
$
77.5 $
38.6 $
18.9
1.1
1.3
(1.8 )
4.7
1.3
—
(10.6 )
(4.0 )
(3.3 )
18.2
0.3
17.9
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
53
RYERSON HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In millions)
2018
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
$
106.4 $
18.0 $
18.9
Operating activities:
Net income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
(used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization
Stock-based compensation
Deferred income taxes
Provision for allowances, claims, and doubtful accounts
Restructuring and other charges
Other-than-temporary impairment charge on equity securities
Gain on bargain purchase
Loss on retirement of debt
Premium and fees paid related to debt modification
Non-cash (gain) loss from derivatives
Liquidation of investment in foreign entity
Other items
Change in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions:
Receivables
Inventories
Other assets
Accounts payable
Accrued liabilities
Accrued taxes payable/receivable
Deferred employee benefit costs
Net adjustments
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
Investing activities:
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
Capital expenditures
Proceeds from sale of property, plant, and equipment
Proceeds from insurance settlement
Other investing activities
Net cash used in investing activities
Financing activities:
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock
Long-term debt issued
Repayment of debt
Net proceeds of short-term borrowings
Purchase of subsidiary shares from noncontrolling interest
Credit facility issuance costs
Net increase (decrease) in book overdrafts
Long-term debt issuance costs
Principal payments on capital lease obligations
Contingent payment related to acquisitions
Proceeds from sale leaseback transactions
Contributions from non-controlling interest
Net cash provided by financing activities
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash
Net change in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash—beginning of period
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash—end of period
Supplemental disclosures:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest paid to third parties
Income taxes, net
Noncash investing activities:
Asset additions under capital leases and sale-leasebacks
Asset additions under financing arrangements
$
$
$
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
54
52.9
3.3
7.8
3.7
4.2
—
(70.0 )
1.7
—
2.7
—
(0.5 )
(64.8 )
(21.4 )
(7.3 )
58.4
16.8
2.2
(38.7 )
(49.0 )
57.4
(169.7 )
(38.4 )
5.9
2.0
—
(200.2 )
—
—
(52.4 )
149.9
(0.2 )
(0.6 )
6.3
—
(13.7 )
(0.9 )
4.5
—
92.9
(49.9 )
(4.3 )
(54.2 )
78.5
24.3 $
92.8 $
2.1
12.9 $
4.6
47.1
2.2
(9.2 )
1.5
—
0.2
—
—
—
3.0
—
(0.7 )
(44.0 )
(42.9 )
(8.3 )
58.1
4.6
6.3
(38.4 )
(20.5 )
(2.5 )
(49.2 )
(25.1 )
3.8
—
0.2
(70.3 )
—
—
(0.2 )
74.3
—
—
(18.0 )
—
(14.4 )
(0.9 )
24.9
—
65.7
(7.1 )
3.9
(3.2 )
81.7
78.5 $
84.9 $
1.7
42.8 $
3.0
42.5
1.4
4.7
3.1
1.0
4.7
—
8.7
(15.7 )
(5.4 )
1.2
0.3
(22.5 )
(6.5 )
12.7
20.4
(5.2 )
1.2
(40.7 )
5.9
24.8
—
(23.0 )
3.2
—
—
(19.8 )
71.5
650.0
(738.8 )
37.0
—
(1.3 )
3.6
(5.2 )
(4.8 )
(1.0 )
—
0.4
11.4
16.4
0.9
17.3
64.4
81.7
89.2
1.8
5.3
—
RYERSON HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In millions, except shares)
At December 31,
2018
2017
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
Restricted cash (Note 3)
Receivables less provisions of $2.5 in 2018 and $4.9 in 2017
Inventories (Note 4)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
Total current assets
Property, plant, and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation (Note 5)
Deferred income taxes (Note 17)
Other intangible assets (Note 6)
Goodwill (Note 7)
Deferred charges and other assets
Total assets
Liabilities
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable
Accrued liabilities:
Salaries, wages, and commissions
Interest on debt
Other accrued liabilities
Short-term debt (Note 9)
Current portion of deferred employee benefits
Total current liabilities
Long-term debt (Note 9)
Deferred employee benefits (Note 10)
Other noncurrent liabilities
Total liabilities
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)
Equity
Ryerson Holding Corporation stockholders’ equity (deficit):
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 7,000,000 shares authorized and no shares
issued at 2018 and 2017
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized and 37,656,505
shares issued at 2018; 100,000,000 shares authorized and 37,421,081 issued at
2017
Capital in excess of par value
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)
Treasury stock at cost – Common stock of 212,500 shares in 2018 and 2017
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
Total Ryerson Holding Corporation stockholders’ equity (deficit)
Noncontrolling interest
Total equity (deficit)
Total liabilities and equity
$
$
$
$
23.2 $
1.1
521.0
806.3
61.5
1,413.1
489.0
—
58.1
120.3
5.8
2,086.3 $
77.4
1.1
376.3
616.5
32.6
1,103.9
422.9
17.9
46.9
115.3
5.0
1,711.9
390.2 $
275.0
66.6
9.9
67.1
27.3
7.9
569.0
1,126.0
258.4
57.0
2,010.4
40.3
10.0
48.4
21.3
7.7
402.7
1,024.4
243.5
48.7
1,719.3
—
—
0.4
381.0
14.2
(6.6 )
(315.8 )
73.2
2.7
75.9
2,086.3 $
0.4
377.6
(95.1 )
(6.6 )
(286.3 )
(10.0 )
2.6
(7.4 )
1,711.9
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
55
RYERSON HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(In millions, except shares in thousands)
Ryerson Holding Corporation Stockholders
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Common
Stock
Treasury
Stock
Shares Dollars Shares Dollars Dollars
Dollars
Capital in
Excess of
Par Value
Retained
Earnings
(Accumulated
Deficit)
Dollars
Foreign
Currency
Translation
Cash
Flow
Hedge -
Interest
Rate
Swap
Unrealized
Gain (Loss) on
Equity
Securities
Dollars
Non-
controlling
Interest
Dollars Dollars
Redeemable
Non-
controlling
Interest
Dollars Dollars
Total
Equity
Benefit Plan
Liabilities
Dollars
32,312 $ 0.3 213 $ (6.6 ) $ 302.6 $
(130.9 ) $
(53.8 ) $
(252.5 ) $
(0.7 ) $ — $
0.7 $ (140.9 ) $
0.1
— — — —
— — — —
— — — —
— — — —
— — — —
Balance at
January 1,
2016
Net income
(loss)
Foreign
currency
translation
Gain on intra-
entity foreign
currency
transactions
Changes in
defined benefit
pension and
other post-
retirement
benefit plans,
net of tax of
$4.4
Unrealized loss
on equity
securities, net
of tax of $0.7 — — — —
Other-than-
temporary
impairment,
net of tax of
$1.8
Stock-based
compensation
expense
Issuance of
common stock 5,000 0.1 — —
Contributions
from non-
controlling
interest
Liquidation of
investment in
foreign entity
Balance at
December 31,
2016
Net income
Foreign
currency
translation
Gain on intra-
entity foreign
currency
transactions
Changes in
defined benefit
pension and
other post-
retirement
benefit plans,
net of tax of
$5.6
Unrealized loss
on equity
securities, net
— — — —
— — — —
— — — —
— — — —
— — — —
33 — — —
—
18.7
—
—
—
—
0.8
19.5
(0.6 )
—
—
1.1
—
—
—
—
1.1
—
—
—
1.3
—
—
—
—
1.3
—
—
—
—
(6.2 )
—
—
—
(6.2 )
—
—
—
—
—
(1.1 )
—
—
(1.1 )
—
—
—
—
—
2.9
—
—
2.9
—
1.4
—
—
—
—
—
—
1.4
71.4
—
—
—
—
—
—
71.5
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
— —
0.4
—
—
1.2
—
—
—
—
1.2
0.1
—
—
5.4
—
—
—
0.2
5.6
—
—
—
3.2
—
—
—
—
3.2
—
—
—
—
12.4
—
—
—
12.4
—
37,345 $ 0.4 213 $ (6.6 ) $ 375.4 $
— — — —
—
(112.2 ) $
17.1
(50.2 ) $
—
(258.7 ) $
—
1.1 $ — $
—
—
1.5 $ (49.3 ) $
18.0
0.9
—
—
37,421 $ 0.4 213 $ (6.6 ) $ 377.6 $
— — — —
—
(95.1 ) $
106.0
(41.6 ) $
—
(246.3 ) $
—
1.0 $
—
0.6 $
—
2.6 $
(7.4 ) $
0.4 106.4
—
—
76 — — —
— — — —
— — — —
— — — —
of tax of $0.1 — — — —
Other-than-
temporary
impairment,
net of tax of
$0.1
Stock-based
compensation
expense
Cash flow
hedge - interest
rate swap, net
of tax of $0.4 — — — —
Balance at
December 31,
2017
Net income
Foreign
currency
translation
Loss on intra-
entity foreign
currency
transactions
Changes in
defined benefit
pension and
other post-
retirement
benefit plans,
net of tax of
$4.6
Adoption of
accounting
principal ASU
2016-01
Adoption of
accounting
principal ASC
606, net of tax
of $0.7
Stock-based
compensation
expense
Purchase of
subsidiary
shares from
noncontrolling
interest
Cash flow
hedge - interest
rate swap, net
of tax of $0.1 — — — —
Balance at
December 31,
2018
— — — —
— — — —
— — — —
— — — —
235 — — —
—
—
—
—
(0.2 )
—
—
(0.2 )
—
—
—
—
—
0.1
—
—
0.1
—
2.2
—
—
—
—
—
—
2.2
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.6
—
0.6
—
—
—
(8.2 )
—
—
—
—
(8.2 )
—
—
—
(3.0 )
—
—
—
—
(3.0 )
—
—
—
—
(17.7 )
—
—
— (17.7 )
—
—
1.0
—
—
(1.0 )
—
— —
—
—
2.3
—
—
—
—
—
2.3
—
3.3
—
—
—
—
—
—
3.3
—
0.1
—
—
—
—
—
(0.3 )
(0.2 )
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.4
—
0.4
—
37,656 $ 0.4 213 $ (6.6 ) $ 381.0 $
14.2 $
(52.8 ) $
(264.0 ) $
— $
1.0 $
2.7 $ 75.9 $
—
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
56
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1: Summary of Accounting and Financial Policies
Business Description and Basis of Presentation. Ryerson Holding Corporation (“Ryerson Holding”), a Delaware corporation, is the parent
company of Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc. (“JT Ryerson”), a Delaware corporation. Affiliates of Platinum Equity, LLC (“Platinum”) own approximately
21,037,500 shares of our common stock, which is approximately 56% of our issued and outstanding common stock. We are a leading value-added
processor and distributor of industrial metals with operations in the United States through JT Ryerson, in Canada through our indirect wholly-owned
subsidiary Ryerson Canada, Inc., a Canadian corporation (“Ryerson Canada”), and in Mexico through our indirect wholly-owned subsidiary Ryerson
Metals de Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V., a Mexican corporation (“Ryerson Mexico”). In addition to our North American operations, we conduct materials
processing and distribution operations in China through an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, Ryerson China Limited (“Ryerson China”). Unless the
context indicates otherwise, Ryerson Holding, JT Ryerson, Ryerson Canada, Ryerson China, and Ryerson Mexico together with their subsidiaries, are
collectively referred to herein as “Ryerson,” “we,” “us,” “our,” or the “Company.”
Principles of Consolidation. The Company consolidates entities in which it owns or controls more than 50% of the voting shares. All significant
intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Business Segments. Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 280, “Segment
Reporting” (“ASC 280”), establishes standards for reporting information on operating segments in interim and annual financial statements. Our Chief
Executive Officer, together with our Board of Directors, serve as our Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”). Our CODM reviews our financial
information for purposes of making operational decisions and assessing financial performance. The CODM views our business globally as metals service
centers. We have one operating and reportable segment, metal service centers, in accordance with the criteria set forth in ASC 280.
Use of Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) in the United
States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and related
notes to the financial statements. Changes in such estimates may affect amounts reported in future periods.
Reclassifications. Certain amounts in the 2017 and 2016 financial statements, as previously reported, have been revised to conform to the 2018
presentation. These changes did not have a material impact on the presentation of the consolidated financial statements.
Equity Investments. Investments in affiliates in which the Company’s ownership is 20% to 50% are accounted for by the equity method. Equity
income is reported in “Other income and (expense), net” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Equity income during the years ended
December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016 totaled zero, $0.1 million, and $0.2 million, respectively.
Revenue Recognition. Revenue is recognized in accordance with FASB ASC 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (“ASC 606”).
Revenue is recognized based on the consideration expected to be received for delivery of as-is or processed metal products when, or as, the Company
satisfies its contractual obligation to transfer control of a product to a customer, which we refer to as a performance obligation. See Note 16: Revenue
Recognition for further details.
Provision for allowances, claims, and doubtful accounts. We perform ongoing credit evaluations of customers and set credit limits based upon
review of the customers’ current credit information and payment history. The Company monitors customer payments and maintains a provision for
estimated credit losses based on historical experience and specific customer collection issues that the Company has identified. Estimation of such losses
requires adjusting historical loss experience for current economic conditions and judgments about the probable effects of economic conditions on certain
customers. The Company cannot guarantee that the rate of future credit losses will be similar to past experience. Provisions for allowances and claims are
based upon historical rates, expected trends, and estimates of potential returns, allowances, customer discounts, and incentives. The Company considers
all available information when assessing the adequacy of the provision for allowances, claims, and doubtful accounts.
Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs. Shipping and handling fees billed to customers are classified in “Net Sales” in our Consolidated
Statement of Operations. Shipping and handling costs, primarily distribution costs, are classified in “Warehousing, delivery, selling, general, and
administrative” expenses in our Consolidated Statement of Operations. These costs totaled $112.3 million, $84.8 million, and $76.4 million for the years
ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. In accordance with ASC 606, the Company has elected to treat shipping and handling costs as an
activity necessary to fulfill the performance obligation
57
to transfer product to the customer and not as a separate performance obligation. Shipping and handling costs are estimated at quarter end in proportion
to revenue recognized for transactions where actual costs are not yet known.
Benefits for Retired Employees. The Company recognizes the funded status of its defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans in the
Consolidated Balance Sheets, with changes in the funded status recognized through accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, in the
year in which the changes occur. The estimated cost of the Company’s defined benefit pension plan and its postretirement medical benefits are
determined annually after considering information provided by consulting actuaries. Key factors used in developing estimates of these liabilities include
assumptions related to discount rates, rates of return on investments, future compensation costs, healthcare cost trends, benefit payment patterns, and
other factors. The cost of these benefits for retirees is accrued during their term of employment. Pensions are funded primarily in accordance with the
requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) of 1974 and the Pension Protection Act of 2006 into a trust established for the
Ryerson Pension Plan. Costs for retired employee medical benefits are funded when claims are submitted. Certain employees are covered by a defined
contribution plan, for which the cost is expensed in the period earned.
Cash Equivalents. Cash equivalents reflected in the financial statements are highly liquid, short-term investments with original maturities of three
months or less. Checks issued in excess of funds on deposit at the bank represent “book” overdrafts. We reclassified $57.5 million and $51.2 million to
accounts payable at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Inventory Valuation. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market value. We primarily use the last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) method for valuing
our domestic inventories. We use the moving average cost and the specific cost methods for valuing our foreign inventories.
Property, Plant, and Equipment. Property, plant, and equipment, including land use rights and capital lease assets, are depreciated for financial
reporting purposes using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. The provision for depreciation in all periods presented is
based on the following estimated useful lives of the assets:
Land improvements
Buildings
Machinery and equipment
Furniture and fixtures
Transportation equipment
Land use rights
20 years
45 years
10-15 years
10 years
3-6 years
50 years
Expenditures for normal repairs and maintenance are charged against income in the period incurred.
Goodwill. In accordance with FASB ASC 350, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other” (“ASC 350”), goodwill is reviewed at least annually for
impairment or whenever indicators of potential impairment exist. We test for impairment of goodwill by assessing various qualitative factors with respect
to developments in our business and the overall economy and calculating the fair value of a reporting unit using the discounted cash flow method, as
necessary. If we determine that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than the carrying value based on our qualitative
assessment, we will proceed to the quantitative goodwill impairment test, in which we compare the fair value of the reporting unit where the goodwill
resides to its carrying value. If the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that
excess, not to exceed the carrying amount of the goodwill. The fair value of the reporting unit is estimated using a combination of an income approach
and a market approach as this combination is deemed to be the most indicative of fair value in an orderly transaction between market participants.
Long-lived Assets and Other Intangible Assets. Long-lived assets held and used by the Company are reviewed for impairment whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. The Company estimates the future cash flows expected
to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. If the sum of the expected future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges)
is less than the carrying amount of the asset, an impairment is recognized. Any related impairment loss is calculated based upon comparison of the fair
value to the carrying value of the asset. Separate intangible assets that have finite useful lives are amortized over their useful lives. An impaired
intangible asset would be written down to fair value, using the discounted cash flow method.
Deferred Financing Costs. Deferred financing costs associated with the issuance of debt are being amortized using the effective interest method
over the life of the debt. Deferred financing costs related to a recognized debt liability are presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the
carrying amount of the related debt liability.
58
Income Taxes. Deferred tax assets or liabilities reflect temporary differences between amounts of assets and liabilities for financial and tax
reporting. Such amounts are adjusted, as appropriate, to reflect changes in enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when the temporary differences
reverse. A valuation allowance is established to offset any deferred tax assets if, based upon the available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or
all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The determination of the amount of a valuation allowance to be provided on recorded deferred tax assets
involves estimates regarding (1) the timing and amount of the reversal of taxable temporary differences, (2) expected future taxable income, (3) the impact
of tax planning strategies, and (4) the ability to carry back tax losses to offset prior taxable income. In assessing the need for a valuation allowance, the
Company considers all available positive and negative evidence, including past operating results, projections of future taxable income, and the feasibility
of ongoing tax planning strategies. The projections of future taxable income include a number of estimates and assumptions regarding volume, pricing,
costs, and industry cyclicality.
Significant judgment is required in determining income tax provisions and in evaluating tax positions. In the normal course of business, the
Company and its subsidiaries are examined by various federal, state, and foreign tax authorities. The Company records the impact of a tax position, if that
position is more likely than not to be sustained in audit, based on the technical merits of the position. The Company regularly assesses the potential
outcomes of these examinations and any future examinations for the current or prior years in determining the adequacy of our provision for income taxes.
The Company continually assesses the likelihood and amount of potential adjustments and adjusts the income tax provision, the current tax liability, and
deferred taxes in the period in which the facts that give rise to a revision become known.
The Company recognizes the benefit of tax positions when a benefit is more likely than not (i.e., greater than 50% likely) to be sustained on its
technical merits. Recognized tax benefits are measured at the largest amount that is more likely than not to be sustained, based on cumulative probability,
in final settlement of the position. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax
expense.
Earnings Per Share Data. Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing net earnings available to common stockholders by the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed by giving effect to all dilutive potential
common shares that were outstanding during the period, unless inclusion of the potential common shares would have an antidilutive effect. Basic
earnings per share excludes the dilutive effect of common stock equivalents such as stock options and warrants, while diluted earnings per share,
assuming dilution, includes such dilutive effects.
Foreign Currency. The Company translates assets and liabilities of its foreign subsidiaries, where the functional currency is the local currency,
into U.S. dollars at the current rate of exchange on the last day of the reporting period. Revenues and expenses are translated at the average monthly
exchange rates prevailing during the year.
For foreign currency transactions, the Company translates these amounts to the Company’s functional currency at the exchange rate effective on
the invoice date. If the exchange rate changes between the time of purchase and the time actual payment is made, a foreign exchange transaction gain or
loss results which is included in determining net income (loss) for the year. The Company recognized $3.0 million of exchange gains for the year ended
December 31, 2018, and $2.8 million and $4.0 million of exchange losses for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. These amounts are
primarily classified in “Other income and (expense), net” in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Standards–Adopted
In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers,” which created ASC
606 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (“ASC 606”) and supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in ASC 605 “Revenue
Recognition” (“ASC 605”). The guidance in ASU 2014-09 and subsequently issued amendments outlines a comprehensive model for all entities to use in
accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers as well as required disclosures. Under the new standard, recognition of revenue occurs
when a customer obtains control of promised goods or services in an amount that reflects the consideration which the entity expects to receive in
exchange for those goods or services. The new standard requires additional disclosure of the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and
cash flows arising from contracts with customers including significant judgments and changes in judgments. We adopted the new standard effective
January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective transition method with the cumulative effect recorded to the opening balance of retained earnings as of
the date of adoption. See Note 16: Revenue Recognition for further details.
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, “Financial Instruments – Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities,” and in February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-03, “Technical corrections and improvements to
59
Financial Instruments – Overall (Subtopic 825-10) – Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.” The amendments
in ASU 2016-01 change the accounting for non-consolidated equity investments that are not accounted for under the equity method of accounting by
requiring changes in fair value to be recognized in net income. Under prior guidance, changes in fair value for investments of this nature were recognized
in accumulated other comprehensive income as a component of stockholders’ equity. Additionally, ASU 2016-01 simplifies the impairment assessment of
equity investments without readily determinable fair values; requires entities to use the exit price when estimating the fair value of financial instruments;
and modifies various presentation disclosure requirements for financial instruments. The amendments should be applied by means of a cumulative-effect
adjustment to the balance sheet as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. The amendments related to equity securities without readily
determinable fair values (including disclosure requirements) should be applied prospectively to equity investments that exist as of the date of adoption.
The update is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. We adopted this guidance for our fiscal year
beginning January 1, 2018. The adoption of this guidance resulted in a reclassification of $1.0 million from accumulated other comprehensive income to
retained earnings.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows – Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Certain Cash
Payments.” The amendments address the diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the
statement of cash flows. The update is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The amendments should be
applied using a retrospective transition method to each period presented. If it is impracticable to apply the amendments retrospectively for some of the
issues, the amendments for those issues would be applied prospectively as of the earliest date practicable. We adopted this guidance for our fiscal year
beginning January 1, 2018. We have made an accounting policy election to classify distributions received from equity method investees using the
cumulative earnings approach. The adoption of this guidance resulted in reclassifications for distributions received from equity method investees and
payments of contingent consideration related to acquisitions within the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2017
and 2016, but the overall impact was not material.
In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, “Income Taxes – Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory.” The amendment
requires an entity to recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs. The
update is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The amendments should be applied on a modified
retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment directly to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. We adopted this
guidance for our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2018. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18 “Statement of Cash Flows – Restricted Cash.” The amendment requires entities to include in
their cash and cash-equivalent balances in the statement of cash flows those amounts that are deemed to be restricted cash and restricted cash
equivalents. The ASU does not define the terms “restricted cash” and “restricted cash equivalents.” The amendment is effective for interim and annual
reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. We adopted this guidance for our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2018 using a retrospective
transition method to each period presented. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. The
previous disclosure for restricted cash within investing activities was removed and the beginning and ending balances of restricted cash are now
included in the cash and cash-equivalents balances in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. There was no impact on the cash flows from
operations. See Note 3: Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash for additional required disclosures.
In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07, “Compensation – Retirement Benefits: Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost
and Net Periodic Post Retirement Benefit Cost.” The amendment requires entities to disaggregate the service cost component from the other
components of net benefit cost and limits the capitalization of net benefit cost to only the service cost component. The amendment also provides explicit
guidance on how to present the service cost component and the other components of net benefit cost in the statement of comprehensive income. The
amendments are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The disclosure requirements of the amendments
should be applied retrospectively and the requirements concerning capitalization of the net service costs should be applied prospectively. We adopted
this guidance for our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2018. The adoption of this guidance resulted in an $8.9 million and $11.1 million reclassification
between warehousing, delivery, selling, general, and administrative and other income and (expense), net within the Consolidated Statements of
Operations for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, with no impact on gross margins, and overall did not have a material impact on
our consolidated financial statements.
In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, “Compensation – Stock Compensation: Scope of Modification Accounting.” The amendment
provides guidance about which changes to the terms and conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply the accounting guidance
on modifications to share-based payment awards. The guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017.
We adopted this guidance for our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2018. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on our consolidated
financial statements.
60
In October 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-16, “Inclusion of the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) Overnight Index Swap (OIS) Rate
as a Benchmark Interest Rate for Hedge Accounting Purposes.” The amendment permits the use of the OIS rate based on SOFR as a U.S. benchmark
interest rate for hedge accounting purposes under Topic 815. The update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim
periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted in any interim period upon issuance of this update if an entity already has adopted ASU
2017-12. We early adopted this guidance as of December 31, 2018. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Standards–Not Yet Adopted
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases” codified in ASC 842, “Leases”. The guidance in ASU 2016-02 and subsequently issued
amendments requires lessees to recognize assets and liabilities on the balance sheet for the rights and obligations created by all leases. The amendment
also requires disclosures designed to give financial statement users information on the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases.
The update is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. We will adopt the standard effective January 1, 2019
using the alternative modified retrospective transition method, which allows for application of the guidance at the beginning of the period in which it is
adopted, rather than at the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented.
The Company has established a cross-functional project team to implement the new lease guidance. We have evaluated existing contracts to
identify embedded leases, implemented a lease software to be used for lease tracking and reporting, and developed internal controls around the
collection, reporting, and reconciliation of lease data.
The Company is finalizing the quantification of the effects on our consolidated financial statements. We have made an accounting policy election
to keep leases with an initial term of 12 months or less off the balance sheet and recognize the related lease payments in the Consolidated Statements of
Operations on a straight-line basis over the lease term. We have elected to use the package of practical expedients as well as the practical expedient not
to separate lease and non-lease components for all asset classes. The adoption of the standard is expected to result in the recognition of an operating
right-of-use asset of approximately $81 million, an operating lease liability of approximately $85 million, and an adjustment to the opening balance of
retained earnings of approximately $3 million, as of January 1, 2019. We do not believe the standard will materially affect our consolidated net earnings or
have a notable impact on our liquidity. The standard will have no impact on our debt-covenant compliance under our current agreements.
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments.”
The guidance in ASU 2016-13 and subsequently issued amendments requires financial assets measured at amortized cost basis to be presented at the net
amount expected to be collected, thus eliminating the probable initial recognition threshold and instead reflecting the current estimate of all expected
credit losses. The guidance also requires that credit losses relating to available-for-sale debt securities be recorded through an allowance for credit losses
rather than a write-down, thus enabling the ability to record reversals of credit losses in current period net income. The update is effective for interim and
annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019. An entity will apply the amendment through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained
earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective (that is, a modified-retrospective approach). A prospective
transition approach is required for debt securities for which an-other-than-temporary impairment had been recognized before the effective date. The effect
of the prospective transition approach is to maintain the same amortized cost basis before and after the effective date of this update. Early adoption is
permitted only for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. We will adopt this guidance for our
fiscal year beginning January 1, 2020. We are still assessing the impact of adoption on our consolidated financial statements.
In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-02, “Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.” The
guidance allows a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the U.S. Tax
Cuts and Jobs Act (“U.S. Tax Act”). It also requires certain disclosures about stranded tax effects. However, the underlying guidance that requires that
the effect of a change in tax laws or rates be included in income from continuing operations is not affected. The guidance is effective for interim and
annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018 and should be applied either in the period of adoption or retrospectively to each period (or
periods) in which the effect of the change in the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate in the U.S. Tax Act is recognized. Early adoption is permitted. We
will adopt this guidance for our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2019. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on our
consolidated financial statements.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, “Disclosure Framework – Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value
Measurement.” The guidance amends the fair value measurement disclosures by modifying the disclosure requirements in Topic 820, Fair Value
Measurement. The update is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15,
61
2019. The guidance allows for early adoption to remove or modify disclosures upon issuance of this amendment, and for delayed adoption of the
additional disclosures until their effective date. We are still assessing the impact of adoption on our current fair value measurement disclosures.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-14, “Disclosure Framework – Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans.”
The amendment removes certain employee benefit plan disclosures that no longer are considered cost-beneficial, clarifies the specific requirements of
certain disclosures, and adds certain disclosure requirements identified as relevant. The update is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after
December 15, 2020 and should be applied on a retrospective basis to all periods presented. Early adoption is permitted. We are still assessing the impact
of adoption on our current employee benefit plans disclosures.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15, “Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement
That Is a Service Contract.” The guidance aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a
service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software (and hosting
arrangements that include an internal-use software license). Accordingly, the guidance requires an entity (customer) in a hosting arrangement that is a
service contract to follow the guidance in Subtopic 350-40 to determine which implementation costs to capitalize as an asset related to the service
contract and which costs to expense. The guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019 and should be
applied either retrospectively or prospectively to all implementation costs incurred after the date of adoption. Early adoption is permitted. We are still
assessing the impact of adoption on our consolidated financial statements.
Note 2: Acquisitions
On July 2, 2018 (“the acquisition date”) JT Ryerson purchased Central Steel and Wire Company (“CS&W”). CS&W is a leading metal service
center with locations across the Central and Eastern United States offering a wide selection of products and capabilities, with a commercial portfolio
centered on bar, tube, plate, and steel products. We believe that the acquisition of CS&W will expand our long, tube, and plate portfolio. Our combined
commercial, operational, and processing strengths will provide a broader and deeper array of products to our customers in the Midwest and Northeast
United States. The fair value of the consideration totaled $163.5 million on the acquisition date.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date.
Cash and cash equivalents
Receivables, less provision for allowance, claims, and doubtful accounts
Inventories
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
Property, plant, and equipment
Other intangible assets
Total identifiable assets acquired
Accounts payable
Salaries, wages, and commissions
Other accrued liabilities
Deferred income taxes
Deferred employee benefits
Total liabilities assumed
Net identifiable assets acquired
Bargain purchase gain
Total purchase price
At July 2,
2018
(In millions)
10.0
80.0
179.8
1.7
66.5
16.1
354.1
(49.7 )
(4.9 )
(6.5 )
(27.7 )
(31.8 )
(120.6 )
233.5
(70.0 )
163.5
$
$
The Company used third-party valuation firms to estimate the fair values of property, plant, and equipment and intangible assets as well as to
remeasure the deferred employee benefits liabilities. Inventory was valued by the Company using acquisition date fair values of the metals.
62
The fair value of accounts receivables acquired is $80.0 million, with a gross amount of $81.8 million. The Company expects $1.8 million to be
uncollectible.
The $16.1 million of acquired intangible assets is related to trademarks acquired with a useful life of 10 years.
The transaction resulted in a bargain purchase gain primarily due to higher inventory and property, plant, and equipment fair values compared to
book values. The Company believes that the bargain purchase gain was primarily the result of the decision by majority stockholders of CS&W to sell
their interests as CS&W had been experiencing increasing net losses. The agreed upon purchase price reflected the fact the seller would have needed to
incur significant costs on future integration initiatives and to upgrade their infrastructure and computer systems in order to restore the CS&W to a
profitable basis. With our existing nationwide service center operations, we believe that our infrastructure will allow the necessary operational
improvements to be implemented more efficiently than the seller. The gain of $70.0 million is included in Other income and (expense), net in the
Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company has recognized $1.6 million in acquisition-related fees, which is included in Warehousing, delivery,
selling, general, and administrative expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Included in the year ended December 31, 2018 financial results is $347.5 million of revenue and $78.5 million (includes the $70.0 million bargain
purchase gain) of net income from CS&W since the acquisition date.
The following unaudited pro forma information presents consolidated results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 as if
the acquisition of CS&W on July 2, 2018 had occurred on January 1, 2017:
Pro Forma
For the Year Ended December 31,
2018
2017
Net sales
Net income (loss) attributable to Ryerson Holding Corporation
$
4,767.7
15.2
$
3,961.3
(1.3 )
The 2018 supplemental pro forma net income attributable to Ryerson Holding Corporation was adjusted to exclude the $70.0 million CS&W bargain
purchase gain realized in 2018 as it is a nonrecurring item.
On April 2, 2018, Ryerson Holding acquired Fanello Industries, LLC (“Fanello”), a privately owned metal service company located in Lavonia,
Georgia. The acquisition is not material to our consolidated financial statements.
On February 15, 2017, Ryerson Holding acquired Guy Metals, Inc. (“Guy Metals”), a privately-owned metal service center company located in
Hammond, Wisconsin. The acquisition is not material to our consolidated financial statements.
On January 19, 2017, Ryerson Holding acquired The Laserflex Corporation (“Laserflex”), a privately-owned metal fabricator specializing in laser
fabrication metal processing and welding with locations in Columbus, Ohio and Wellford, South Carolina. The acquisition is not material to our
consolidated financial statements.
Pro forma information related to the acquisitions of Fanello, Guy Metals, and Laserflex is not provided above as the impact on the Consolidated
Statements of Operations is not material.
Note 3: Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash
The following table provides a reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash reported within the Consolidated Balance Sheets that
sum to the total of the beginning and ending cash balances shown in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows:
Cash and cash equivalents
Restricted cash
Total cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash
At December 31,
2018
2017
$
$
(In millions)
23.2 $
1.1
24.3 $
77.4
1.1
78.5
We have cash restricted for purposes of covering letters of credit that can be presented for potential insurance claims.
63
Note 4: Inventories
Inventories, at stated LIFO value, were classified at December 31, 2018 and 2017 as follows:
In process and finished products
At December 31,
2018
2017
$
(In millions)
806.3 $
616.5
If current cost had been used to value inventories, such inventories would have been $18 million higher and $71 million lower than reported at
December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Approximately 91% and 89% of inventories are accounted for under the LIFO method at December 31, 2018 and
2017, respectively. Non-LIFO inventories consist primarily of inventory at our foreign facilities using the moving average cost and the specific cost
methods. Substantially all of our inventories consist of finished products.
The Company has consignment inventory at certain customer locations, which totaled $9.3 million and $8.9 million at December 31, 2018 and 2017,
respectively.
Note 5: Property, Plant, and Equipment
Property, plant, and equipment consisted of the following at December 31, 2018 and 2017:
Land and land improvements
Buildings and leasehold improvements
Machinery, equipment, and other
Capital and financing leases
Construction in progress
Total
Less: Accumulated depreciation
Net property, plant, and equipment
At December 31,
2018
2017
(In millions)
101.2 $
238.1
406.7
76.6
15.8
838.4
(349.4 )
489.0 $
92.6
198.8
377.9
65.5
7.9
742.7
(319.8 )
422.9
$
$
The Company recorded impairment charges related to fixed assets of $0.2 million, $0.1 million, and $0.4 million for the years ended December 31,
2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. The impairment charges recorded in all periods related to certain assets held for sale in order to recognize the assets at
their fair value less cost to sell, in accordance with FASB ASC 360-10-35-43, “Property, Plant, and Equipment – Other Presentation Matters.” The
Company recognized gains on the sale of assets classified as held for sale of zero, $0.5 million, and zero for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and
2016 respectively. The Company had $7.8 million and zero of assets held for sale classified within “Prepaid expenses and other current assets” on the
Consolidated Balances Sheets as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
64
Note 6: Definite-Lived Intangible Assets
The following summarizes the components of definite-lived intangible assets at December 31, 2018 and 2017:
Amortizable intangible assets
Customer relationships
Developed technology / product know-how
Non-compete agreements
Trademarks
Licenses
Total definite-lived intangible assets
At December 31, 2018
At December 31, 2017
Weighted
Average
Amortizable
Life in
Years
Gross
Carrying
Amount
Accumulated
Amortization
Net
Gross
Carrying
Amount
Accumulated
Amortization
Net
(In millions)
13.0
7.9
5.6
13.7
7.0
$
$
58.1 $
4.6
0.9
42.3
0.5
106.4 $
(33.8 ) $
(2.5 )
(0.6 )
(10.9 )
(0.5 )
(48.3 ) $
24.3 $
2.1
0.3
31.4
—
58.1 $
56.9 $
4.6
0.9
25.4
0.5
88.3 $
(29.7 ) $
(2.2 )
(0.4 )
(8.6 )
(0.5 )
(41.4 ) $
27.2
2.4
0.5
16.8
—
46.9
Amortization expense related to intangible assets for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016 was $6.9 million, $6.1 million, and $5.4
million, respectively.
Estimated amortization expense related to intangible assets at December 31, 2018, for each of the years in the five year period ending December 31,
2023 and thereafter is as follows:
For the year ended December 31, 2019
For the year ended December 31, 2020
For the year ended December 31, 2021
For the year ended December 31, 2022
For the year ended December 31, 2023
For the years ended thereafter
Estimated
Amortization Expense
(In millions)
$
7.6
7.3
6.4
6.3
5.1
25.4
Note 7: Goodwill
The following is a summary of changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017:
Balance at January 1, 2017
Acquisitions
Balance at December 31, 2017
Acquisitions
Balance at December 31, 2018
Cost
Accumulated
Impairment
(In millions)
Carrying
Amount
$
$
$
111.5
12.1
123.6
5.0
128.6
$
$
$
(8.3 )
—
(8.3 )
—
(8.3 )
$
$
$
$
103.2
12.1
115.3
5.0
120.3
In 2018, the Company recognized $5.0 million of goodwill within the US Reporting unit related to the Fanello acquisition, which will be deductible
for income tax purposes. In 2017, the Company recognized $12.1 million of goodwill within the US reporting unit related to both the Laserflex acquisition,
which will be deductible for income tax purposes, and the Guy Metals acquisition, which is not deductible for income tax purposes.
Pursuant to ASC 350, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other,” we review the recoverability of goodwill annually as of October 1 or whenever
significant events or changes occur which might impair the recovery of recorded amounts. Based on our October 1, annual goodwill impairment test, we
determined there was no goodwill impairment in 2018.
65
Note 8: Restructuring and Other Charges
The following summarizes restructuring accrual activity for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016:
Employee
Related
Costs
Tenancy
and Other
Costs
(In millions)
Total
Restructuring
Costs
Balance at January 1, 2016
Restructuring charges
Cash payments
Reclassification
(Reduction)/addition to reserve
Balance at Year Ended December 31, 2016
Restructuring charges
Cash payments
Reclassification
Reduction to reserve
Balance at December 31, 2017
Restructuring charges
Cash payments
Balance at December 31, 2018
2018
$
$
$
$
1.2
—
(0.7 )
—
(0.3 )
0.2
—
—
—
(0.2 )
—
3.6
(3.2 )
0.4
$
$
$
$
$
$
0.5
1.0
(0.5 )
0.2
0.1
1.3
0.8
(0.5 )
0.1
—
1.7
0.6
(0.8 )
$
1.5
$
1.7
1.0
(1.2 )
0.2
(0.2 )
1.5
0.8
(0.5 )
0.1
(0.2 )
1.7
4.2
(4.0 )
1.9
In 2018, the Company recorded a $3.6 million charge for employee-related costs primarily for severance costs for corporate staff reductions and
two facility closures. The Company paid $3.2 million of the employee costs related to these actions. The remaining $0.4 million of employee-related costs
are expected to be paid in 2019.
During 2018, the Company also recorded a $0.6 million charge to increase the reserve for tenancy-related costs for a facility closed in 2013. The
Company paid $0.8 million in costs related to this facility closure. The remaining $1.5 million of tenancy-related costs are expected to be paid through
2025.
2017
In 2017, the Company recorded an $0.8 million charge in warehousing, delivery, selling, general, and administrative expense in the Consolidated
Statements of Operations to increase the reserve for tenancy-related costs for a facility closed in 2013. The Company paid $0.4 million in costs related to
this facility closure and also reclassified an existing $0.1 million liability for future lease payments to the restructuring reserve. In addition, the Company
paid $0.1 million in costs related to a facility closed in 2016.
During 2017, the Company recorded a $0.2 million reduction to the reserve for employee-related costs and credited warehousing, delivery,
selling, general, and administrative expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. This action fully utilized the remaining reserve for employee-
related costs.
2016
In 2016, the Company recorded a charge of $1.0 million related to a facility closure, which consists of tenancy-related costs, primarily future
lease payments. The Company paid $0.2 million in costs related to this facility closure and reclassified an existing $0.2 million liability for future lease
payments at this facility to the restructuring reserve. The Company also paid $0.3 million in costs related to a facility closed in 2013 and recorded an
addition of $0.1 million to the reserve for tenancy-related costs, which was charged to warehousing, delivery, selling, general, and administrative expense
in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
During 2016, the Company paid $0.7 million in employee-related costs related to restructuring actions taken in the fourth quarter of 2015. The
Company also recorded a $0.3 million reduction to the reserve for employee-related costs and credited warehousing, delivery, selling, general, and
administrative expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
66
Note 9: Debt
Long-term debt consisted of the following at December 31, 2018 and 2017:
Ryerson Credit Facility
11 % Senior Secured Notes due 2022
Foreign debt
Other debt
Unamortized debt issuance costs and discounts
Total debt
Less:
Short-term foreign debt
Other short-term debt
Total long-term debt
At December 31,
2018
2017
(In millions)
535.9 $
599.5
19.5
8.3
(9.9 )
1,153.3
19.5
7.8
1,126.0 $
384.2
650.0
21.3
3.9
(13.7 )
1,045.7
21.3
—
1,024.4
$
$
The principal payments required to be made on debt during the next five fiscal years are shown below:
For the year ended December 31, 2019
For the year ended December 31, 2020
For the year ended December 31, 2021
For the year ended December 31, 2022
For the year ended December 31, 2023
For the years ended thereafter
$
Amount
(In millions)
27.3
0.1
536.0
599.7
0.1
—
Ryerson Credit Facility
On November 16, 2016, Ryerson entered into an amendment with respect to its $1.0 billion revolving credit facility (as amended, the “Old Credit
Facility”), to reduce the total facility size from $1.0 billion to $750 million, reduce the interest rate on outstanding borrowings by 25 basis points, reduce
commitment fees on amounts not borrowed by 2.5 basis points, and to extend the maturity date to November 16, 2021. On June 28, 2018, Ryerson entered
into a second amendment with respect to the Old Credit Facility to increase the facility size from $750 million to $1.0 billion (the Old Credit Facility as
amended, the “Ryerson Credit Facility”).
At December 31, 2018, Ryerson had $535.9 million of outstanding borrowings, $12 million of letters of credit issued, and $392 million available
under the Ryerson Credit Facility compared to $384.2 million of outstanding borrowings, $12 million of letters of credit issued, and $264 million available
at December 31, 2017. Total credit availability is limited by the amount of eligible accounts receivable, inventory, and qualified cash pledged as collateral
under the agreement insofar as Ryerson is subject to a borrowing base comprised of the aggregate of these three amounts, less applicable reserves.
Eligible accounts receivable, at any date of determination, is comprised of the aggregate value of all accounts directly created by a borrower (and in the
case of Canadian accounts, the Canadian borrower) in the ordinary course of business arising out of the sale of goods or the rendering of services, each
of which has been invoiced, with such receivables adjusted to exclude various ineligible accounts, including, among other things, those to which a
borrower (or guarantor, as applicable) does not have sole and absolute title and accounts arising out of a sale to an employee, officer, director, or affiliate
of a borrower (or guarantor, as applicable). Eligible inventory, at any date of determination, is comprised of the net orderly liquidation value of all
inventory owned by a borrower (and in the case of Canadian accounts, the Canadian borrower). Qualified cash consists of cash in an eligible deposit
account that is subject to customary restrictions and liens in favor of the lenders.
The Ryerson Credit Facility has an allocation of $940 million to the Company’s subsidiaries in the United States and an allocation of $60 million to
Ryerson Holding’s Canadian subsidiary that is a borrower. Amounts outstanding under the Ryerson Credit Facility bear interest at (i) a rate determined
by reference to (A) the base rate (the highest of the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50%, Bank of America, N.A.’s prime rate, and the one-month LIBOR rate
plus 1.00%), or (B) a LIBOR rate or, (ii) for Ryerson Holding’s Canadian subsidiary that is a borrower, (A) a rate determined by reference to the Canadian
base rate (the greatest of the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50%, Bank of America-Canada Branch’s “base rate” for commercial loans in U.S. Dollars made at
its “base rate”, and the
67
30 day LIBOR rate plus 1.00%), (B) the prime rate (the greater of Bank of America-Canada Branch’s “prime rate” for commercial loans made by it in
Canada in Canadian Dollars and the one-month Canadian bankers’ acceptance rate plus 1.00%), or (C) the bankers’ acceptance rate. The spread over the
base rate and prime rate is between 0.25% and 0.50% and the spread over the LIBOR for the bankers’ acceptances is between 1.25% and 1.50%,
depending on the amount available to be borrowed under the Ryerson Credit Facility. Overdue amounts and all amounts owed during the existence of a
default bear interest at 2% above the rate otherwise applicable thereto. Ryerson also pays commitment fees on amounts not borrowed at a rate of 0.23%.
We attempt to minimize interest rate risk exposure through the utilization of interest rate swaps, which are derivative financial instruments. In
March 2017, we entered into an interest rate swap to fix interest on $150 million of our floating rate debt under the Ryerson Credit Facility at a rate of
1.658% through March 2020. The swap has reset dates and critical terms that match our existing debt and the anticipated critical terms of future debt. The
weighted average interest rate on the outstanding borrowings under the Ryerson Credit Facility including the interest rate swap was 3.5 percent and 2.8
percent at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Borrowings under the Ryerson Credit Facility are secured by first-priority liens on all of the inventory, accounts receivables, lockbox accounts,
and related assets of the borrowers and the guarantors.
The Ryerson Credit Facility also contains covenants that, among other things, restrict Ryerson Holding and its restricted subsidiaries with respect
to the incurrence of debt, the creation of liens, transactions with affiliates, mergers and consolidations, sales of assets, and acquisitions. The Ryerson
Credit Facility also requires that, if availability under the Ryerson Credit Facility declines to a certain level, Ryerson maintain a minimum fixed charge
coverage ratio as of the end of each fiscal quarter, and includes defaults upon (among other things) the occurrence of a change of control of Ryerson and
a cross-default to other financing arrangements.
The Ryerson Credit Facility contains events of default with respect to, among other things, default in the payment of principal when due or the
payment of interest, fees, and other amounts due thereunder after a specified grace period, material misrepresentations, failure to perform certain specified
covenants, certain bankruptcy events, the invalidity of certain security agreements or guarantees, material judgments, and the occurrence of a change of
control of Ryerson. If such an event of default occurs, the lenders under the Ryerson Credit Facility will be entitled to various remedies, including
acceleration of amounts outstanding under the Ryerson Credit Facility and all other actions permitted to be taken by secured creditors.
The lenders under the Ryerson Credit Facility could reject a borrowing request if any event, circumstance, or development has occurred that has
had or could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company. If Ryerson Holding, JT Ryerson, any of the other borrowers, or
any restricted subsidiaries of JT Ryerson becomes insolvent or commences bankruptcy proceedings, all amounts borrowed under the Ryerson Credit
Facility will become immediately due and payable.
Net proceeds of short-term borrowings that are reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows represent borrowings under
the Ryerson Credit Facility with original maturities less than three months.
2022 Notes
On May 24, 2016, JT Ryerson issued $650 million in aggregate principal amount of the 2022 Notes (the “2022 Notes”). The 2022 Notes bear interest
at a rate of 11.00% per annum. The 2022 Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a senior secured basis by all of our existing and future
domestic subsidiaries that are co-borrowers or that have guarantee obligations under the Ryerson Credit Facility.
The 2022 Notes and the related guarantees are secured by a first-priority security interest in substantially all of JT Ryerson’s and each guarantor’s
present and future assets located in the United States (other than receivables, inventory, cash, deposit accounts and related general intangibles, certain
other assets and proceeds thereof), subject to certain exceptions and customary permitted liens. The 2022 Notes and the related guarantees are also
secured on a second-priority basis by a lien on the assets that secure JT Ryerson’s and the Company’s obligations under the Ryerson Credit Facility.
The 2022 Notes will be redeemable, in whole or in part, at any time on or after May 15, 2019 at certain redemption prices. The redemption price for
the 2022 Notes if redeemed during the twelve months beginning (i) May 15, 2019 is 105.50%, (ii) May 15, 2020 is 102.75%, and (iii) May 15, 2021 and
thereafter is 100.00%. JT Ryerson may redeem some or all of the 2022 Notes before May 15, 2019 at a redemption price of 100.00% of the principal amount,
plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption date, plus a “make-whole” premium. In addition, JT Ryerson may redeem up to 35% of the 2022
Notes before May 15, 2019 with respect to the 2022 Notes with the net cash proceeds from certain equity offerings at a price equal to 111.00%, with
respect to the 2022 Notes, of the principal amount thereof, plus any accrued and unpaid interest, if any. JT Ryerson may be required to make an offer to
purchase the 2022 Notes upon the sale of assets or upon a change of control.
68
The 2022 Notes contain customary covenants that, among other things, limit, subject to certain exceptions, our ability, and the ability of our
restricted subsidiaries, to incur additional indebtedness, pay dividends on our capital stock or repurchase our capital stock, make investments, sell
assets, engage in acquisitions, mergers or consolidations, or create liens or use assets as security in other transactions. Subject to certain exceptions, JT
Ryerson may only pay dividends to Ryerson Holding to the extent of 50% of cumulative net income since the issuance of the 2022 Notes, once prior
losses are offset. As a result of these restrictions, the restricted net assets of consolidated subsidiaries exceed 25 percent of consolidated net assets as of
December 31, 2018. Restricted net assets as of December 31, 2018 were $219.2 million.
During 2018, a principal amount of $50.5 million of the 2022 Notes were repurchased for $52.2 million and retired, resulting in the recognition of a
$1.7 million loss within other income and (expense), net on the Consolidated Statement of Operations.
The net proceeds from the issuance of the 2022 Notes, along with borrowings under the Ryerson Credit Facility, were used to (i) repurchase
and/or redeem in full the $569.9 million balance of JT Ryerson’s 9.00% Senior Secured Notes due 2017 (the “2017 Notes”), plus accrued and unpaid
interest thereon up to, but not including, the repayment date, (ii) repurchase $95.0 million of JT Ryerson’s 11.25% Senior Secured Notes due 2018 (the
“2018 Notes”), and (iii) pay related fees, expenses, and premiums.
The Company applied the provisions of ASC 470-50, “Modifications and Extinguishments” in accounting for the issuance of the 2022 Notes,
redemption of the 2017 Notes, and partial repurchase of the 2018 Notes. The evaluation of the accounting under ASC 470-50 was performed on a creditor
by creditor basis in order to determine if the terms of the debt were substantially different and, as a result, whether to apply modification or
extinguishment accounting. For the lenders where it was determined that the terms of the debt were not substantially different, modification accounting
was applied. For the remaining lenders, extinguishment accounting was applied. In connection with this debt modification and extinguishment, the
Company recorded a $16.1 million loss within other income and (expense), net on the Consolidated Statement of Operations during 2016, primarily
attributed to the costs incurred with third parties for arrangement fees, legal, and other services related to the modified debt, as well as redemption fees
paid to the creditors, and unamortized debt issuance costs written off related to the extinguished debt. Additionally, the costs incurred with third parties
for arrangement fees, legal, and other services related to the extinguished debt and redemption fees paid to the creditors related to the modified debt were
capitalized and are being amortized over the life of the modified debt using the effective interest method.
During 2016, a principal amount of $75.4 million of the 2018 Notes were repurchased for $68.0 million and retired, resulting in the recognition of a
$7.4 million gain within other income and (expense), net on the Consolidated Statement of Operations. Including the $16.1 million loss on the redemption
of the $569.9 million balance of the 2017 Notes and repurchase of $95.0 million of the 2018 Notes, the Company recognized a total net loss of $8.7 million
within other income and (expense), net on the Consolidated Statement of Operations during year 2016.
Foreign Debt
At December 31, 2018, Ryerson China’s total foreign borrowings were $19.5 million, which were owed to banks in Asia at a weighted average
interest rate of 4.3% per annum and secured by inventory and property, plant, and equipment. At December 31, 2017, Ryerson China’s total foreign
borrowings were $21.3 million, which were owed to banks in Asia at a weighted average interest rate of 3.7% per annum and secured by inventory and
property, plant, and equipment.
Availability under Ryerson China’s credit facility was $26 million and $25 million at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Letters of credit
issued by our foreign subsidiaries totaled $3 million at December 31, 2018 and 2017.
Note 10: Employee Benefits
The Company accounts for its pension and postretirement plans in accordance with FASB ASC 715, “Compensation – Retirement
Benefits” (“ASC 715”). In addition to requirements for an employer to recognize in its Consolidated Balance Sheet an asset for a plan’s overfunded status
or a liability for a plan’s underfunded status and to recognize changes in the funded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan in the year in which
the changes occur, ASC 715 requires an employer to measure a plan’s assets and its obligations that determine its funded status as of the end of the
employer’s fiscal year.
Prior to January 1, 1998, the Company’s non-contributory defined benefit pension plan (“Ryerson Pension Plan” or “RPP”) covered certain
employees, retirees, and their beneficiaries. Benefits provided to participants of the plan were based on pay and years of service for salaried employees
and years of service and a fixed rate or a rate determined by job grade for all wage employees, including employees under collective bargaining
agreements.
Effective January 1, 1998, the Company froze the benefits accrued under its defined benefit pension plan for certain salaried employees and
instituted a defined contribution plan. Effective March 31, 2000, benefits for certain salaried employees of J. M. Tull
69
Metals Company and AFCO Metals, subsidiaries that were merged into JT Ryerson, were similarly frozen, with the employees becoming participants in
the Company’s defined contribution plan. Employees who vested in their benefits accrued under the defined benefit plan at December 31, 1997 and
March 31, 2000, are entitled to those benefits upon retirement. For the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016, expense recognized for its defined
contribution plans was $8.0 million, $7.2 million, and $6.9 million, respectively.
CS&W also has a non-contributory defined benefit pension plan (“Central Steel and Wire Retirement Plan” or “CSWPP”), which covers certain
employees, retirees, and their beneficiaries. CSWPP paid $5.8 million in lump sums from July 2, 2018 through December 31, 2018. Because the payout was
more than the service cost plus interest cost for the period, settlement accounting was reflected at year-end. There was an unrecognized loss as of
December 31, 2018, of which $0.2 million was recognized in other income and (expense), net within the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Effective May 19, 2017, the Company froze the benefits accrued under a portion of the Ryerson Pension Plan for certain wage employees. The
freeze impacted a significant number of the remaining active accruing participants, therefore, curtailment accounting was required, and the pension plan
was remeasured as of May 31, 2017. The remeasurement resulted in a curtailment loss of $0.1 million, which was recorded in warehousing, delivery,
selling, general, and administrative expense within the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The Company’s U.S. other postretirement benefit plans include the Ryerson Postretirement Welfare Plans (“Ryerson OPEB”) and Central Steel and
Wire Postretirement Medical Plan (“CSW OPEB”).
The Company has other deferred employee benefit plans, including supplemental pension plans, the liability for which totaled $15.1 million and
$17.3 million at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Summary of Assumptions and Activity
The tables included below provide reconciliations of benefit obligations and fair value of plan assets of the Company plans as well as the funded
status and components of net periodic benefit costs for each period related to each plan. The Company uses a December 31 measurement date to
determine the pension and other postretirement benefit information. The Company had an additional measurement date of May 31, 2017 due to the plan
freeze discussed above. The expected rate of return on plan assets is determined based on the market-related value of the assets, recognizing any gains
or losses over a four year period. The method we have chosen for amortizing actuarial gains and losses is to recognize amounts in excess of a 10%
corridor (10% of the greater of the projected benefit obligation or plan assets) which are amortized over the average expected remaining lifetime of the
participants in the pension plan and over the average expected remaining service period for the other postretirement benefits.
The assumptions used to determine benefit obligations at the end of the periods and net periodic benefit costs for the Pension Benefits for U.S.
plans were as follows:
Discount rate for calculating obligations
Discount rate for calculating service cost
Discount rate for calculating interest cost
Expected rate of return on plan assets
Rate of compensation increase – benefit obligations
Rate of compensation increase – net periodic benefit cost
July 2 to
December
31, 2018
(CSWPP)
Year Ended
December 31,
2018 (RPP)
June 1 to
December
31, 2017
January 1
to May 31,
2017
Year Ended
December 31,
2016
4.59 %
4.49
4.22
4.70
3.00
3.00
4.32 %
3.84
3.24
6.70
3.00
2.90
3.64 %
4.20
3.18
6.95
2.90
2.70
3.86 %
4.51
3.44
6.75
2.70
2.70
4.14 %
4.80
3.55
7.10
2.70
2.80
The expected rate of return on plan assets is 6.35% for RPP and 4.00% for CSWPP for 2019.
70
The assumptions used to determine benefit obligations at the end of the periods and net periodic benefit costs for the Other Postretirement
Benefits, primarily health care, for U.S. plans were as follows:
Discount rate for calculating obligations
Discount rate for calculating service cost
Discount rate for calculating interest cost
Rate of compensation increase – benefit obligations
Rate of compensation increase – net periodic benefit cost
July 2 to
December 31,
2018 (CSW
OPEB)
Year Ended
December 31,
2018 (Ryerson
OPEB)
Year Ended
December 31,
2017
Year Ended
December 31,
2016
4.23 %
4.35
3.83
N/A
N/A
4.26 %
3.74
3.09
3.00
3.00
3.57 %
4.25
3.19
3.00
2.50
3.99 %
4.59
3.19
2.50
2.80
The assumptions used to determine benefit obligations at the end of the periods and net periodic benefit costs for the Pension Benefits for
Canadian plans were as follows:
Discount rate for calculating obligations
Discount rate for calculating net periodic benefit cost
Expected rate of return on plan assets
Rate of compensation increase
Year Ended December 31,
2018
2017
2016
Salaried
Bargaining
Salaried
Bargaining
Salaried
Bargaining
3.56 %
3.31
5.25
3.00
3.58 %
3.32
4.50
3.00
3.31 %
3.64
5.50
3.00
3.32 %
3.71
5.25
3.00
3.64 %
3.70
5.75
3.25
3.71 %
3.87
5.50
3.25
The expected rate of return on Canadian plan assets for 2019 is 5.25% for the Ryerson Salaried Plan (approximately 78% of total Canadian plan
assets) and 3.50% for the Ryerson Bargaining Unit Plan (approximately 22% of total Canadian plan assets).
The assumptions used to determine benefit obligations at the end of the periods and net periodic benefit costs for the Other Postretirement
Benefits, primarily healthcare, for Canadian plans were as follows:
Discount rate for calculating obligations
Discount rate for calculating net periodic benefit cost
Rate of compensation increase
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2018
2016
3.53 %
3.31
3.00
3.31 %
3.61
3.00
3.54 %
3.64
3.25
71
Change in Benefit Obligation
Benefit obligation at beginning of year
Acquired benefit obligation
Service cost
Interest cost
Actuarial (gain) loss
Effect of changes in exchange rates
Lump sums paid
Benefits paid (net of participant contributions and
Medicare subsidy)
Benefit obligation at end of year
Accumulated benefit obligation at end of year
Change in Plan Assets
Plan assets at fair value at beginning of year
Acquired plan assets
Actual return on plan assets
Employer contributions
Effect of changes in exchange rates
Lump sums paid
Benefits paid (net of participant contributions)
Plan assets at fair value at end of year
Reconciliation of Amount Recognized
Funded status
Amounts recognized in balance sheet consist of:
Current liabilities
Non-current liabilities
Net benefit liability at the end of the year
Year Ended December 31,
Pension Benefits
Other Benefits
2018
2017
2018
2017
(In millions)
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
797 $
60
2
26
(42 )
(4 )
(23 )
(56 )
760 $
750 $
632 $
43
(40 )
27
(3 )
(23 )
(57 )
579 $
803 $
—
1
26
41
3
(23 )
(54 )
797 $
795
587 $
—
97
22
3
(23 )
(54 )
632 $
69 $
15
—
2
(8 )
(1 )
—
(7 )
70 $
N/A
— $
—
—
7
—
—
(7 )
— $
(181 ) $
(165 ) $
(70 ) $
— $
(181 )
(181 ) $
— $
(165 )
(165 ) $
(7 ) $
(63 )
(70 ) $
74
—
—
3
(1 )
1
—
(8 )
69
N/A
—
—
—
8
—
—
(8 )
—
(69 )
(7 )
(62 )
(69 )
Canadian benefit obligations represented $41 million of the Company’s total Pension Benefits obligations at December 31, 2018 and $46 million at
December 31, 2017. Canadian plan assets represented $38 million of the Company’s total plan assets at fair value at December 31, 2018 and $44 million at
December 31, 2017. In addition, Canadian benefit obligations represented $11 million of the Company’s total Other Benefits obligation at December 31,
2018 and $12 million at December 31, 2017.
The pension benefit obligations recorded as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 were impacted by changes in assumptions. During the year ended
December 31, 2018 the pension benefit obligation decreased by $46 million due to an increase in the year over year discount rate and decreased another
$1 million due to updated mortality rates based on updated mortality tables released by the Society of Actuaries in 2018. During the year ended December
31, 2017 the pension benefit obligation increased by $47 million due to a decrease in the year over year discount rate, decreased $5 million due to updated
mortality rates based on updated mortality tables released by the Society of Actuaries in 2017, and decreased an additional $4 million due to the
demographic assumption studies concluded in 2017.
72
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) at December 31, 2018 and 2017 consist of the following:
Amounts recognized in accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss), pre–tax, consist of
Net actuarial loss (gain)
Prior service credit
Net loss (gain)
At December 31,
Pension Benefits
Other Benefits
2018
2017
2018
2017
(In millions)
$
$
394 $
—
394 $
372 $
—
372 $
(58 ) $
(6 )
(64 ) $
(57 )
(9 )
(66 )
Net actuarial losses of $14.8 million and prior service costs of $0.1 million for pension benefits and net actuarial gains of $7.7 million and prior
service credits of $3.1 million for other postretirement benefits are expected to be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) into net
periodic benefit cost in 2019.
Amounts recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 consist of the following:
Amounts recognized in other comprehensive
income (loss), pre–tax, consist of
Net actuarial loss (gain)
Amortization of net actuarial loss (gain)
Amortization of prior service cost
Net loss (gain)
Year Ended December 31,
Pension Benefits
Other Benefits
2018
2017
2018
2017
(In millions)
$
$
38 $
(16 )
—
22 $
(15 ) $
(14 )
—
(29 ) $
(8 ) $
7
3
2 $
(1 )
8
3
10
For benefit obligation measurement purposes for U.S. plans at December 31, 2018, the annual rate of increase in the per capita cost of covered
health care benefits for participants under 65 was 7.5 percent, grading down to 4.5 percent in 2026, the level at which it is expected to remain. At
December 31, 2018, the rate for participants over 65 was 7.5 percent, grading down to 4.5 percent in 2026, plus a risk adjustment of 0.65 percent grading
down to zero percent in 2022, the level at which it is expected to remain. For measurement purposes for U.S. plans at December 31, 2017, the annual rate of
increase in the per capita cost of covered health care benefits for participants under 65 was 7.0 percent, grading down to 4.5 percent in 2026, the level at
which it is expected to remain. At December 31, 2017, the rate for participants over 65 was 7.0 percent, grading down to 4.5 percent in 2026, plus a risk
adjustment of 0.65 percent grading down to zero percent in 2022, the level at which it is expected to remain.
For benefit obligation measurement purposes for Canadian plans at both December 31, 2018 and 2017, the annual rate of increase in the per capita
cost of covered health care benefits was 7.3 percent per annum, grading down to 4.5 percent in 2033, the level at which it is expected to remain.
The components of the Company’s net periodic benefit cost for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016 are as follows:
Components of net periodic benefit cost
Service cost
Interest cost
Expected return on assets
Recognized actuarial loss (gain)
Amortization of prior service credit
Net periodic benefit cost (credit)
Year Ended December 31,
Pension Benefits
2017
2018
2016
2018
(In millions)
Other Benefits
2017
2016
$
$
2 $
26
(40 )
15
—
3 $
73
1 $
26
(42 )
15
—
— $
1 $
29
(45 )
13
—
(2 ) $
— $
2
—
(7 )
(3 )
(8 ) $
— $
3
—
(8 )
(3 )
(8 ) $
—
3
—
(8 )
(3 )
(8 )
The assumed health care cost trend rate has an effect on the amounts reported for the health care plans. For purposes of determining net periodic
benefit cost for U.S plans, the annual rate of increase in the per capital cost of covered health care benefits for participants under 65 was 7.5 percent,
grading down to 4.5 percent in 2026, the level at which it is expected to remain. The rate for participants over 65 was 7.75 percent, grading down to 4.5
percent in 2026, plus a risk adjustment of 0.65 percent grading down to zero percent in 2022, the level at which it is expected to remain. For purposes of
determining net periodic benefit cost for Canadian plans, the annual rate of increase in the per capita cost of covered health care benefits was 7.3 percent
per annum, grading down to 4.5 percent in 2033, the level at which it is expected to remain.
A one-percentage-point change in the assumed health care cost trend rate would have the following effects:
Effect on service cost plus interest cost
Effect on postretirement benefit obligation
$
1% increase
1% decrease
(In millions)
0.2
3.4
$
(0.2 )
(3.0 )
Pension Trust Assets
The expected long-term rate of return on pension trust assets is 4.00% to 6.35% based on the historical investment returns of the trust, the
forecasted returns of the asset classes, and a survey of comparable pension plan sponsors.
The Company’s pension trust weighted-average asset allocations at December 31, 2018 and 2017, by asset category are as follows:
Equity securities
Debt securities
Real Estate
Other
Total
Trust Assets at
December 31,
2018
2017
43 %
44
3
10
100 %
57 %
26
5
12
100 %
The Board of Directors of JT Ryerson has general supervisory authority over the Pension Trust Fund and approves the investment policies and
plan asset target allocation. An internal management committee provides on-going oversight of plan assets in accordance with the approved policies and
asset allocation ranges and has the authority to appoint and dismiss investment managers. The investment policy objectives are to maximize long-term
return from a diversified pool of assets while minimizing the risk of large losses and to maintain adequate liquidity to permit timely payment of all benefits.
The policies include diversification requirements and restrictions on concentrations in any one single issuer or asset class. The currently approved asset
investment classes are cash, fixed income, domestic equities, international equities, real estate, private equities, and hedge funds of funds. Company
management allocates the plan assets among the approved investment classes and provides appropriate directions to the investment managers pursuant
to such allocations.
The approved target ranges and allocations as of the December 31, 2018 measurement date were as follows:
Equity securities
Debt securities
Real estate
Other
Total
Range
Target
28-66%
20-63
1-8
0-16
58 %
29
6
7
100 %
74
The fair value of our pension plan assets at December 31, 2018 by asset category are as follows. See Note 14 for the definitions of Level 1, 2, and 3
fair value measurements.
Asset Category
Cash and cash equivalents
Equity securities:
US large cap
US small/mid cap
Canadian large cap
Canadian small cap
International companies
Global companies
Fixed income securities:
Investment grade debt
Other types of investments:
Commodity funds
Multi-strategy funds
Investments valued at net asset value
Real estate
Total
Fair Value Measurements at
December 31, 2018
Total
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
$
21 $
(In millions)
21 $
71
22
3
1
92
60
7
1
—
—
5
—
— $
64
21
3
1
87
60
255
18
237
1
1
37
15
579 $
—
—
—
1
53 $
1
1
—
14
489 $
$
The fair value of our pension plan assets at December 31, 2017 by asset category are as follows:
Asset Category
Cash and cash equivalents
Equity securities:
US large cap
US small/mid cap
Canadian large cap
Canadian small cap
International companies
Global companies
Fixed income securities:
Investment grade debt
Other types of investments:
Commodity funds
Multi-strategy funds
Investments valued at net asset value
Real estate
Total
Fair Value Measurements at
December 31, 2017
Total
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
$
15 $
(In millions)
15 $
89
28
5
1
146
95
—
—
—
—
—
—
— $
89
28
5
1
146
95
161
—
161
3
2
53
34
632 $
—
—
—
—
15 $
3
2
—
34
564 $
$
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
The pension assets classified as Level 2 investments in both 2018 and 2017 are part of common collective trust investments.
Certain investments that are measured at fair value using the net asset value per share practical expedient have not been classified in the fair value
hierarchy in accordance with ASU 2015-07, “Disclosures for Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its
Equivalent).” The fair value amounts presented above are intended to permit reconciliation of the fair value hierarchy to the amounts presented in the
Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Securities listed on one or more national securities exchanges are valued at their last reported sales price on the date of valuation. If no sale
occurred on the valuation date, the security is valued at the mean of the last “bid” and “ask” prices on the
75
valuation date. Corporate and government bonds which are not listed or admitted to trading on any securities exchanges are valued at the average mean
of the last bid and ask prices on the valuation date based on quotations supplied by recognized quotation services or by reputable broker dealers. The
non-publicly traded securities, other securities, or instruments for which reliable market quotations are not available are valued at each investment
manager’s discretion. Valuations will depend on facts and circumstances known as of the valuation date and application of certain valuation methods.
Contributions
The Company contributed $27.0 million, $21.7 million, and $22.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively, to
improve the funded status of the plans. The Company anticipates that it will have a minimum required pension contribution funding of approximately $26
million in 2019.
Estimated Future Benefit Payments
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024-2028
$
Pension
Benefits
Other
Benefits
(In millions)
60 $
58
57
57
56
260
7
6
6
6
6
23
Multiemployer Pension and Other Postretirement Plans
We participate in two multiemployer pension plans covering 52 employees at 4 locations. Total contributions to the plans were $0.4 million for
each of the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016. Our contributions represent less than 5% of the total contributions to the plans. The
Company maintains positive employee relations at all locations. During 2012, the Company exited and reentered the pension plan at one of the covered
locations in an effort to reduce the overall pension liability. The transaction resulted in a withdrawal liability of $1.0 million, which will be paid over a
period of 25 years. The balance of the withdrawal liability as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 was $0.5 million. The Company’s participation in these plans
is not material to our financial statements.
Note 11: Commitments and Contingencies
Lease Obligations & Other
The Company leases buildings and equipment under noncancellable operating leases expiring in various years through 2028. Future minimum
rental commitments are estimated to total $101.6 million, including approximately $21.7 million in 2019, $19.2 million in 2020, $17.0 million in 2021, $13.3
million in 2022, $10.5 million in 2023, and $19.9 million thereafter.
Rental expense under operating leases totaled $27.9 million, $28.5 million, and $30.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016,
respectively.
The Company leases equipment under capital leases expiring in various years through 2024. Future minimum rental commitments are estimated to
total $33.8 million, including approximately $13.7 million in 2019, $11.2 million in 2020, $5.7 million in 2021, $2.5 million in 2022, $0.6 million in 2023, and $0.1
million thereafter.
To fulfill contractual requirements for certain customers in 2018, the Company has entered into certain fixed-price noncancellable contractual
obligations. These purchase obligations aggregated to $11.9 million at December 31, 2018 with $11.9 million to be paid in 2019.
Concentrations of Various Risks
The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, equity securities, derivative instruments,
accounts payable, and notes payable. In the case of cash, accounts receivable, equity securities, and accounts payable, the
76
carrying amount on the balance sheet approximates the fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments. The derivative instruments are
marked to market each period. The fair value of notes payable is disclosed in Note 14.
The Company’s financial instruments that are exposed to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of derivative financial instruments and
trade accounts receivable. Our derivative financial instruments are contracts placed with major financial institutions. Credit is generally extended to
customers based upon an evaluation of each customer’s financial condition, with terms consistent in the industry and no collateral required.
Concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade accounts receivable are limited due to the large number of customers and their dispersion across
geographic areas.
Approximately 9% of our total labor force is covered by collective bargaining agreements. There are collective bargaining agreements that will
expire in fiscal 2019, which covers 2% of our total labor force. We believe that our overall relationship with our employees is good.
Litigation
In October 2011, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) named us as one of more than 100 businesses that may be a
potentially responsible party for the Portland Harbor Superfund Site (the “PHS Site”). On January 6, 2017, the EPA issued an initial Record of Decision
(“ROD”) regarding the site. The ROD includes a combination of dredging, capping, and enhanced natural recovery that would take approximately thirteen
years to construct plus additional time for monitored natural recovery, at an estimated present value cost of $1.05 billion. At a meeting on December 4,
2018, the EPA announced that it expects parties to submit a plan to remediate the river and harbor per the original ROD within the next 2-3 years. It also
expects allocation of amounts among the parties to be determined in the same time frame. It is willing to consider de minimus and de micromis settlements
but is unlikely to approve any before completion of the remedial design process.
The EPA has not yet allocated responsibility for the contamination among the potentially responsible parties, including JT Ryerson. We do not
currently have sufficient information available to us to determine whether the ROD will be executed as currently stated, whether and to what extent JT
Ryerson may be held responsible for any of the identified contamination, and how much (if any) of the final plan’s costs might ultimately be allocated to
JT Ryerson. Therefore, management cannot predict the ultimate outcome of this matter or estimate a range of potential loss at this time.
There are various other claims and pending actions against the Company. The amount of liability, if any, for those claims and actions at
December 31, 2018 is not determinable but, in the opinion of management, such liability, if any, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s
financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. We maintain liability insurance coverage to assist in protecting our assets from losses arising from
or related to activities associated with business operations.
Note 12: Segment Information
We have one operating and reportable segment, metals service centers.
The Company derives substantially all of its sales from the distribution of metals. See Note 16: Revenue Recognition for the Company’s
percentage of sales by major product line.
No customer, including their subcontractors, accounted for more than 6 percent of Company sales for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017,
and 2016. The top ten customers accounted for less than 15 percent of our sales for the year ended December 31, 2018, and less than 17 percent of our
sales for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. A significant majority of the Company’s sales are attributable to its U.S. operations and a
significant majority of its long-lived assets are located in the United States. The only operations attributed to foreign countries relate to the Company’s
subsidiaries in Canada, China, and Mexico, which in aggregate comprised 10 percent, 12 percent, and 13 percent of the Company’s sales during the years
ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. Canadian, Chinese, and Mexican long-lived assets were 5 percent, 7 percent, and 7 percent of total
Company long-lived assets at December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively.
77
The following tables summarize consolidated financial information of our operations by geographic location based on where sales originated from:
Net Sales
United States
Foreign countries
Total
Long-Lived Assets
United States
Foreign countries
Total
Note 13: Other Matters
Equity Investment
2018
Year Ended December 31,
2017
(In millions)
2016
$
$
3,950.5 $
457.9
4,408.4 $
2,962.4 $
402.3
3,364.7 $
2,485.9
373.8
2,859.7
2018
At December 31,
2017
(In millions)
2016
$
$
464.1 $
24.9
489.0 $
395.3 $
27.6
422.9 $
362.5
25.7
388.2
In 2011, Ryerson acquired a 38 percent equity interest in Automated Laser Fabrication Co., LLC (“ALF”). ALF is a steel processing company
located in Streetsboro, Ohio. The Company accounts for this investment under the equity method of accounting. The Company’s investment in this joint
venture is not considered material to the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.
Liquidation of Investment in Foreign Entity
On February 17, 2012, the Company acquired 50 percent of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Açofran Aços e Metais Ltda (“Açofran”), a
long products distributor located in São Paulo, Brazil. The Company fully consolidated Açofran based on voting control. The Company was party to a
put option arrangement with respect to the securities that represent the noncontrolling interest of Açofran. The put was exercisable by the minority
shareholders outside of the Company’s control by requiring the Company to redeem the minority shareholders’ equity stake in the subsidiary at a put
price based on earnings before interest, income tax, depreciation and amortization expense, and net debt. The redeemable noncontrolling interest was
classified as mezzanine equity and measured at the greater of estimated redemption value at the end of each reporting period or the historical cost basis
of the noncontrolling interest adjusted for earnings and foreign currency allocations.
As of December 31, 2016, the Company substantially liquidated its investment in Acofran. In accordance with ASC 830-30-40, “Foreign Currency
Matters,” the Company reclassified the $1.2 million accumulated foreign currency translation adjustment loss on the Consolidated Statement of
Stockholders’ Equity to Other income and (expense), net on the Consolidated Statement of Operations during 2016.
Note 14: Derivatives and Fair Value Measurements
Derivatives
The Company is exposed to certain risks relating to its ongoing business operations. The primary risks managed by using derivative instruments
are interest rate risk, foreign currency risk, and commodity price risk. Interest rate swaps are entered into to manage interest rate risk associated with the
Company’s floating-rate borrowings. We use foreign currency exchange contracts to hedge variability in cash flows when a payment currency is
different from our functional currency. From time to time, we may enter into fixed price sales contracts with our customers for certain of our inventory
components. We may enter into metal commodity futures and options contracts to reduce volatility in the price of these metals. We may also enter into
natural gas and diesel fuel price swaps to manage the price risk of forecasted purchases of natural gas and diesel fuel.
We have a receive variable, pay fixed, interest rate swap to manage the exposure to variable interest rates of the Ryerson Credit Facility. In March
2017, we entered into a forward agreement for $150 million of “pay fixed” interest at 1.658%, “receive variable” interest to manage the risk of increasing
variable interest rates. The interest rate reset dates and critical terms match the terms of our
78
existing debt and anticipated critical terms of future debt under the Ryerson Credit Facility. The fair value of the interest rate swap as of December 31,
2018 was an asset of $1.5 million.
In accordance with FASB ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging” (“ASC 815”), the Company currently does not account for its commodity
contracts and foreign exchange derivative contracts as hedges but rather marks them to market with a corresponding offset to current earnings. The
Company accounts for its interest rate swap as a cash flow hedge of floating-rate borrowings with changes in fair value being recorded in accumulated
other comprehensive income.
The Company regularly reviews the creditworthiness of its derivative counterparties and does not expect to incur a significant loss from the failure
of any counterparties to perform under any agreements.
The following table summarizes the location and fair value amount of our derivative instruments reported in our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of
December 31, 2018 and 2017:
Asset Derivatives
Fair Value
Liability Derivatives
Fair Value
Balance Sheet
Location
December 31,
2018
December 31,
2017
Balance Sheet
Location
December 31,
2018
December 31,
2017
(In millions)
Derivatives not designated as hedging
instruments under ASC 815
Metal commodity contracts
Foreign exchange contracts
Derivatives designated as hedging
instruments under ASC 815
Interest rate swaps
Total derivatives
Prepaid expenses and
other current assets
Prepaid expenses and
other current assets
$
1.6 $
0.2
2.8
0.1
Other accrued
liabilities
Other accrued
liabilities
$
5.4 $
Deferred charges and
other assets
$
1.5
3.3 $
1.0
3.9
Taxes and other
credits
$
—
—
5.4 $
3.9
—
—
3.9
The following table presents the volume of the Company’s activity in derivative instruments as of December 31, 2018 and 2017:
Derivative Instruments
Nickel swap contracts
Hot roll coil swap contracts
Aluminum swap contracts
Zinc swap contracts
Foreign currency exchange contracts
Interest rate swap
Notional Amount
At December 31, 2018 At December 31, 2017
453
5,252
15,102
3,402
5.1 million
150 million
1,541
36,365
42,419
—
4.5 million
150 million
Unit of Measurement
Tons
Tons
Tons
Tons
U.S. dollars
U.S. dollars
The following table summarizes the location and amount of gains and losses on derivatives not designated as hedging instruments reported in our
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016:
Derivatives not designated as hedging
instruments under ASC 815
Metal commodity contracts
Diesel fuel commodity contracts
Foreign exchange contracts
Total
Location of Gain/(Loss)
Recognized in Income
on Derivatives
Cost of materials sold
Warehousing, delivery, selling,
general, and administrative
Other income and (expense), net
79
Amount of Gain/
(Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives
Year Ended December 31,
2018
2017
(In millions)
2016
$
(3.1 ) $
3.1 $
—
0.2
(2.9 ) $
—
—
3.1 $
$
10.0
0.1
(0.1 )
10.0
The following table summarizes the location and amount of gains and losses on derivatives designated as hedging instruments reported in our
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016:
Derivatives designated as hedging
instruments under ASC 815
Location of Gain/(Loss)
Recognized in Income
on Derivatives
Amount of Gain/(Loss)
Reclassified from Other Comprehensive Income into
Income
Year Ended December 31,
2018
2017
(In millions)
2016
Interest rate swaps
Interest and other expense on debt
$
0.5 $
(0.7 ) $
—
As of December 31, 2018, the portion of the $1.5 million interest rate swap asset that would be reclassified into earnings during the next 12 months
as interest income is approximately $1.3 million.
Fair Value Measurements
To increase consistency and comparability, FASB ASC 820 “Fair Value Measurement” (“ASC 820”) establishes a fair value hierarchy that
prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three levels as follows:
1.
2.
3.
Level 1—quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access as of the
reporting date.
Level 2—inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are directly observable for the asset or liability or indirectly observable
through corroboration with observable market data.
Level 3—unobservable inputs, such as internally-developed pricing models for the asset or liability due to little or no market activity for the
asset or liability.
The following table presents assets and liabilities measured and recorded at fair value on our Consolidated Balance Sheets on a recurring basis
and their level within the fair value hierarchy as of December 31, 2018:
Assets
Derivatives:
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815:
Metal commodity contracts
Foreign exchange contracts
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815:
Interest rate swaps
Total derivatives
Liabilities
Derivatives:
Level 1
At December 31, 2018
Level 2
(In millions)
Level 3
$
$
— $
—
—
— $
1.6 $
0.2
1.5
3.3 $
—
—
—
—
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815:
Metal commodity contracts
$
— $
5.4 $
—
80
The following table presents assets and liabilities measured and recorded at fair value on our Consolidated Balance Sheets on a recurring basis
and their level within the fair value hierarchy as of December 31, 2017:
Assets
Prepaid and other current assets:
Equity securities
Derivatives:
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815:
Metal commodity contracts
Foreign exchange contracts
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815:
Interest rate swaps
Total derivatives
Liabilities
Derivatives:
Level 1
At December 31, 2017
Level 2
(In millions)
Level 3
$
0.1 $
— $
—
$
$
— $
—
—
— $
2.8 $
0.1
1.0
3.9 $
—
—
—
—
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815:
Metal commodity contracts
$
— $
3.9 $
—
The fair value of each derivative contract is determined using Level 2 inputs and the market approach valuation technique, as described in ASC
820. The Company has various commodity derivatives to lock in nickel and zinc prices for varying time periods. The fair value of these derivatives is
determined based on the spot price each individual contract was purchased at and compared with the one-month daily average actual spot price on the
London Metals Exchange for nickel and zinc on the valuation date. The Company also has commodity derivatives to lock in hot roll coil, iron ore, and
aluminum prices for varying time periods. The fair value of hot roll coil, iron ore, and aluminum derivatives is determined based on the spot price each
individual contract was purchased at and compared with the one-month daily average actual spot price on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, the
Singapore Exchange, and the London Metals Exchange, respectively, for the commodity on the valuation date. In addition, the Company has numerous
foreign exchange contracts to hedge variability in cash flows when a payment currency is different from our functional currency. The Company defines
the fair value of foreign exchange contracts as the amount of the difference between the contracted and current market value at the end of the period. The
Company estimates the current market value of foreign exchange contracts by obtaining month-end market quotes of foreign exchange rates and forward
rates for contracts with similar terms. The Company uses the exchange rates provided by Reuters. Each commodity and foreign exchange contract term
varies in the number of months, but in general, contracts are between 3 to 12 months in length. The fair value of our interest rate swap is based on the
sum of all future net present value cash flows for the fixed and floating leg of the swap. The future cash flows are derived based on the terms of our
interest rate swap, as well as published discount factors, and projected forward LIBOR rates.
The carrying and estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments at December 31, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:
Cash and cash equivalents
Restricted cash
Receivables less provision for allowances, claims, and
doubtful accounts
Accounts payable
Long-term debt, including current portion
$
At December 31, 2018
At December 31, 2017
Carrying
Amount
Fair Value
Carrying
Amount
Fair Value
23.2 $
1.1
521.0
390.2
1,153.3
(In millions)
23.2 $
1.1
521.0
390.2
1,158.5
77.4 $
1.1
376.3
275.0
1,045.7
77.4
1.1
376.3
275.0
1,125.9
The estimated fair value of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents, receivables less provision for allowances, claims, and doubtful accounts,
and accounts payable approximate their carrying amounts due to the short-term nature of these financial
81
instruments. The estimated fair value of the Company’s long-term debt and the current portions thereof is determined by using quoted market prices of
Company debt securities (Level 2 inputs).
The fair values less costs to sell of long-lived assets held for sale are assessed each reporting period that they remain classified as held for sale.
Any increase or decrease in the held for sale long-lived asset’s fair value less cost to sell is reported as an adjustment to its carrying amount, except that
the adjusted carrying amount cannot exceed the carrying amount of the long-lived asset at the time it was initially classified as held for sale. The fair
values of each property were determined based on appraisals obtained from a third-party, pending sales contracts, or recent listing agreements with third-
party brokerage firms (Level 2 inputs).
The following table presents assets and liabilities measured and recorded at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheets on a non-recurring
basis and their level within the fair value hierarchy as of December 31, 2018:
Assets
Prepaid expenses and other current assets - assets held for sale (Note 5) $
— $
7.8 $
—
There were no assets or liabilities classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2017.
Level 1
At December 31, 2018
Level 2
(In millions)
Level 3
Equity Securities
The Company had zero and $0.1 million of equity securities, classified within “Prepaid expenses and other current assets,” as of December 31, 2018
and 2017.
Subsequent to the adoption of ASU 2016-01, management values these investments at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in other
income (expense), net. The amount of loss recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations in the year ended December 31, 2018 was $0.1 million.
Prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-01, management valued these investments at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in accumulated
other comprehensive income. The balance of $1.0 million outstanding within accumulated other comprehensive income related to these investments at
December 31, 2017 was reclassed to retained earnings upon the adoption of ASU 2016-01.
There is no maturity date for these investments. Sales for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016 were not material.
82
Note 15: Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
The following table details the changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the years ended December 31, 2018 and
December 31, 2017:
Balance at January 1, 2017
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss)
Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss)
Balance at December 31, 2017
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss)
Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss)
Balance at December 31, 2018
Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Income (Loss) by Component, net of tax
Foreign
Currency
Translation
Benefit
Plan
Liabilities
Equity
Securities
Cash Flow
Hedge -
Interest Rate
Swap
$
$
$
(50.2 ) $
8.6
—
8.6
(41.6 ) $
(11.2 )
—
(11.2 )
(52.8 ) $
(In millions)
(258.7 ) $
15.4
(3.0 )
12.4
(246.3 ) $
(13.9 )
(3.8 )
(17.7 )
(264.0 ) $
1.1 $
(0.2 )
0.1
(0.1 )
1.0 $
—
(1.0 )
(1.0 )
— $
—
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.6
0.7
(0.3 )
0.4
1.0
The following tables detail the reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the years ended December 31, 2018 and
December 31, 2017:
Details about Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Components
Amortization of defined benefit pension
and other post-retirement benefit plan items
Actuarial gain
Prior service cost
Total before tax
Tax provision
Net of tax
Change in accounting principal (ASU 2016-01)
Change in accounting principal (ASU 2016-01)
Tax provision
Net of tax
Cash flow hedge - interest rate swap
Realized swap interest income
Tax provision
Net of tax
Reclassifications Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Amount reclassified from
Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income
(Loss)
For the Year Ended
December 31, 2018
(In millions)
Affected line item in the Consolidated
Statements of
Operations / Consolidated Balance Sheet
$
$
$
$
$
$
83
Warehousing, delivery, selling,
general, and administrative
Warehousing, delivery, selling,
general, and administrative
(8.1 )
3.0
(5.1 )
1.3
(3.8 )
(1.0 ) Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)
—
(1.0 )
(0.5 ) Interest and other expense on debt
0.2
(0.3 )
Details about Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Components
Amortization of defined benefit pension
and other post-retirement benefit plan items
Actuarial gain
Prior service cost
Total before tax
Tax provision
Net of tax
Other-than-temporary impairment
Other-than-temporary impairment charge
Tax benefit
Net of tax
Cash flow hedge - interest rate swap
Realized swap interest loss
Tax benefit
Net of tax
Note 16: Revenue Recognition
$
$
$
$
$
$
Reclassifications Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Affected line item in the
Consolidated Statements of
Operations
Amount reclassified from
Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income
(Loss)
For the Year Ended
December 31, 2017
(In millions)
(6.9 )
Warehousing, delivery, selling,
general, and administrative
Warehousing, delivery, selling,
general, and administrative
2.9
(4.0 )
1.0
(3.0 )
0.2 Other income and (expense), net
(0.1 )
0.1
0.7 Interest and other expense on debt
(0.3 )
0.4
We are a leading metals service center that distributes and provides value-added processing of industrial metals with operations in the United
States, Canada, Mexico, and China. We purchase large quantities of metal products from primary producers and sell these materials in smaller quantities
to a wide variety of metals-consuming industries. More than 75% of the metals products sold are processed by us by burning, sawing, slitting, blanking,
cutting to length, or other techniques.
Revenue Accounting Policy
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASC 606 which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in ASC 605, and requires entities to recognize
revenue when control of the promised goods or services is transferred to customers at an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity
expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services.
The Company adopted ASC 606 as of January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective transition method. The cumulative effect of initially
applying the new standard was recorded as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings within our Condensed Consolidated Balance
Sheet. The adjustment to retained earnings was the result of changing the accounting for revenues associated with custom products with no alternative
use for which we have an enforceable right to payment, from point in time recognition to over time recognition. The revenues associated with the
products and services that were partially satisfied at January 1, 2018 which were included in the modified transition method adjustment aggregated $12.3
million. The net impact on retained earnings associated with these revenues was $2.3 million. For all adjustments and changes as a result of adopting
ASC 606 for the current period, please refer to the section “Impacts on Financial Statements” below. In accordance with the modified retrospective
transition method, the historical information within the financial statements has not been restated and continues to be reported under the accounting
standard in effect for those periods. As a result, the Company has disclosed the accounting policies in effect prior to January 1, 2018, as well as the
policies it has applied starting January 1, 2018.
84
Periods prior to January 1, 2018
Revenue is recognized in accordance with ASC 605. Revenue is recognized upon delivery of product to customers and is recorded net of returns,
allowances, customer discounts, and incentives. Sales taxes collected from customers and remitted to governmental authorities are accounted for on a
net (excluded from revenues) basis.
Periods commencing January 1, 2018
Revenue is recognized based on the consideration expected to be received for delivery of as-is or processed metal products when, or as, the
Company satisfies its contractual obligation to transfer control of a product to a customer, which we refer to as a performance obligation. Predominately
all of our contracts contain a single performance obligation.
The majority of our revenue is recognized at a point in time. The Company has determined that the most definitive demonstration that control has
transferred to a customer is physical delivery, with the exception of bill and hold and consignment transactions. The Company’s bill-and-hold
transactions are arrangements where a customer requests that we bill them for a product even though we retain physical possession of the product until
it is subsequently delivered to the customer. Bill and hold revenue is recorded when all of the criteria within ASC 606 are met. Consignment transactions
are arrangements where the Company transfers product to a customer location but retains ownership and control of such product until it is used by the
customer. Revenue for consignment arrangements is recognized upon the customer’s usage.
Revenues associated with products which we believe have no alternative use, and where the Company has an enforceable right to payment, are
recognized on an over time basis. Products with no alternative use include products made from unique alloys, custom extrusions, non-standard gauges,
items that been processed to a custom size that cannot be cost effectively reworked to a standard size, or items processed to customer specific drawings
or specifications. Over-time revenues are recorded in proportion with the progress made toward completing the performance obligation.
Ryerson uses both input and output methods of measuring progress towards completion based on the type and extent of processing
completed. Input methods are used for complex processing with multiple steps occurring over multiple days. Under the input method, the measure of
performance, commonly called percentage of completion, is the ratio of costs incurred to date to the total estimated costs at completion for the
products. Output methods are used for products with minimal processing where the normal pattern of production is less than one day. In these cases,
the progress towards completion is measured based on the number of products on hand and ready for delivery in comparison to the total number of
products in the order.
Significant judgment is required in determining which products qualify for over time revenue recognition, the methodology to be used in
calculating the progress toward completion, and estimating the costs incurred to date and the total cost at completion.
Revenue is recorded net of returns, allowances, customer discounts, and incentives. Sales taxes collected from customers and remitted to
governmental authorities are accounted for on a net (excluded from revenues) basis.
Prices are generally fixed at the time of order confirmation. At each quarter end, the Company calculates an estimate of potential cash discounts
and returns and allowances that could be taken by customers that are associated with outstanding accounts receivable, as well as estimates of customer
rebates. Cash discounts and returns and allowances are calculated based on historical experience. Customer rebates are estimated based on actual sales
and projections over the rebate period.
The Company has elected to treat shipping and handling costs as an activity necessary to fulfill the performance obligation to transfer product to
the customer and not as a separate performance obligation. Shipping and handling costs are estimated at quarter end in proportion to revenue recognized
for transactions where actual costs are not yet known. Shipping and handling costs are included in Warehousing, delivery, selling, general, and
administrative expense. The balance recognized related to shipping and handling costs was a net contract liability of $0.1 million as of December 31, 2018.
The Company’s performance obligations are typically short-term in nature. As a result, the Company has elected the practical expedient that
provides an exemption of the disclosure requirements regarding information about remaining performance obligations on contracts that have original
expected durations of one year or less.
Disaggregated Revenue
We have one operating and reportable segment, metals service centers.
85
The Company derives substantially all of its sales from the distribution of metals. The following table shows the Company’s percentage of sales
by major product line:
Product Line
Carbon Steel Flat
Carbon Steel Plate
Carbon Steel Long
Stainless Steel Flat
Stainless Steel Plate
Stainless Steel Long
Aluminum Flat
Aluminum Plate
Aluminum Long
Other
Total
2018
2017
2016
27 %
11
14
16
4
4
15
3
4
2
100 %
28 %
10
12
18
4
4
15
3
4
2
100 %
28 %
9
13
17
4
3
16
3
5
2
100 %
A significant majority of the Company’s sales are attributable to its U.S. operations. The only operations attributed to foreign countries relate to
the Company’s subsidiaries in Canada, China, and Mexico. The following table summarizes consolidated financial information of our operations by
geographic location based on where sales originated:
Net Sales
United States
Foreign countries
Total
2018
Years Ended December 31,
2017
(In millions)
2016
$
$
3,950.5 $
457.9
4,408.4 $
2,962.4 $
402.3
3,364.7 $
2,485.9
373.8
2,859.7
As stated above, revenue is recognized either at a point in time or over time based on if the contract has an enforceable right to payment and the
type of product that is being sold to the customer with products that are determined to have no alternative use being recognized over time. The following
table summarizes revenues by the type of item sold:
Timing of Revenue Recognition
Revenue on products with an alternative use
Revenue on products with no alternative use
Total
Year Ended December 31, 2018
88 %
12
100 %
Contract Balances
A receivable is recognized in the period in which an invoice is issued, which is generally when the product is delivered to the customer. Payment
terms on invoiced amounts are typically 30 days from the invoice date. We do not have any contracts with significant financing components.
Receivables, which are included in accounts receivables within the Consolidated Balance Sheet, from contracts with customers were $523.5 million
and $381.2 million as of December 31, 2018 and at the adoption of ASC 606, respectively.
86
Contract assets, which consist primarily of revenues recognized over time that have not yet been invoiced and estimates of the value of inventory
that will be received in conjunction with product returns, are reported in prepaid expenses and other current assets within the Consolidated Balance
Sheet. Contract liabilities, which consist primarily of accruals associated with amounts that will be paid to customers for volume rebates, cash discounts,
sales returns and allowances, estimates of shipping and handling costs associated with performance obligations recorded over time, and bill and hold
transactions are reported in other accrued liabilities within the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Significant changes in the contract assets and the contract
liabilities balances during the period are as follows:
Beginning Balance
Transferred to receivables from contract assets recognized at January 1, 2018
Satisfied contract liability from beginning of the period
Contract liability incurred during the period
Net contract assets and liabilities added for products with no alternative during the period
Contract assets and liabilities acquired
Changes to reserves
Reclass from contract liability to contract asset
Ending Balance
Year Ended
December 31, 2018
Contract
Assets
Contract
Liabilities
(In millions)
14.2 $
(12.3 )
—
—
10.9
0.5
1.5
1.8
16.6 $
6.9
—
(7.6 )
8.2
0.2
—
0.5
1.8
10.0
$
$
Impacts on Financial Statements
The following table summarizes the impacts of adopting ASC 606 on the Company’s current year Consolidated Statement of Operations:
Year Ended December 31, 2018
As Reported
ASC 606 Adjustments
Balances without
adoption of ASC 606
Net sales
Cost of materials sold
Gross profit
Warehousing, delivery, selling, general, and
administrative
Restructuring and other charges
Operating profit
Other income and (expense), net
Interest and other expense on debt
Income before income taxes
Provision for income taxes
Net income
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
Net income attributable to Ryerson Holding Corporation
Basic earnings per share
Diluted earnings per share
$
$
$
$
4,408.4 $
3,650.3
758.1
614.7
4.2
139.2
76.7
(99.2 )
116.7
10.3
106.4
0.4
106.0 $
2.84 $
2.81 $
1.4 $
3.3
(1.9 )
0.1
—
(2.0 )
—
—
(2.0 )
(0.5 )
(1.5 )
—
(1.5 ) $
(0.04 ) $
(0.04 ) $
4,409.8
3,653.6
756.2
614.8
4.2
137.2
76.7
(99.2 )
114.7
9.8
104.9
0.4
104.5
2.80
2.77
87
The following table summarizes the impacts of adopting ASC 606 on the Company’s current year Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows:
Operating activities:
Net income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities:
Deferred income taxes
Other non cash adjustments
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
$
$
Receivables
Inventories
Other assets
Accounts payable
Accrued liabilities
Accrued taxes payable/receivable
Deferred employee benefit costs
Net adjustments
Net cash used in operating activities
As reported
December 31, 2018
ASC 606 Adjustments
(In millions)
Balances without
adoption of ASC 606
106.4 $
(1.5 ) $
104.9
7.8 $
(2.0 )
(64.8 )
(21.4 )
(7.3 )
58.4
16.8
2.2
(38.7 )
(49.0 )
57.4
(0.5 )
—
1.8
2.3
1.7
—
(3.8 )
—
—
1.5
—
7.3
(2.0 )
(63.0 )
(19.1 )
(5.6 )
58.4
13.0
2.2
(38.7 )
(47.5 )
57.4
The following table summarizes the impacts of adopting ASC 606 on the Company’s current year Consolidated Balance Sheets:
As reported
December 31, 2018
ASC 606 Adjustments
(In millions)
Balances without
adoption of ASC 606
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash
Accounts receivable, net
Inventories
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
Total current assets
Property, plant, and equipment, net
Goodwill
Other noncurrent assets
Total assets
Accounts payable
Salaries, wages, and commissions
Other accrued liabilities
Short-term debt
Current portion of deferred employee benefits
Total current liabilities
Long-term debt
Deferred employee benefits
Other noncurrent liabilities
Total liabilities
Retained Earnings
Additional paid-in capital, accumulated other
comprehensive loss, and noncontrolling interest
Total equity
Total liabilities and equity
24.3 $
521.0
806.3
61.5
1,413.1
489.0
120.3
63.9
2,086.3 $
390.2 $
66.6
77.0
27.3
7.9
569.0
1,126.0
258.4
57.0
2,010.4
14.2
61.7
75.9
2,086.3 $
$
$
$
$
88
— $
(4.5 )
8.5
(16.5 )
(12.5 )
—
0.3
—
(12.2 ) $
— $
—
(7.1 )
—
—
(7.1 )
—
—
(1.3 )
(8.4 )
(3.8 )
—
(3.8 )
(12.2 ) $
24.3
516.5
814.8
45.0
1,400.6
489.0
120.6
63.9
2,074.1
390.2
66.6
69.9
27.3
7.9
561.9
1,126.0
258.4
55.7
2,002.0
10.4
61.7
72.1
2,074.1
Note 17: Income Taxes
The elements of the provision (benefit) for income taxes were as follows:
Income before income tax:
U.S.
Foreign
Current income taxes:
Federal
Foreign
State
Deferred income taxes
Total income tax provision (benefit)
2018
Year Ended December 31,
2017
(In millions)
2016
$
$
$
$
100.6 $
16.1
116.7 $
(1.3 ) $
3.7
0.1
2.5
7.8
10.3 $
11.3 $
5.4
16.7 $
5.6 $
1.8
0.5
7.9
(9.2 )
(1.3 ) $
20.1
6.0
26.1
(0.3 )
2.8
—
2.5
4.7
7.2
Income taxes differ from the amounts computed by applying the federal tax rate as follows:
Federal income tax expense computed at statutory
tax rate of 21% in 2018 and 35% in 2017 and 2016
Additional taxes or credits from:
2018
Year Ended December 31,
2017
(In millions)
2016
$
24.5 $
5.8 $
9.1
State and local income taxes, net of federal income tax
effect
Non-deductible expenses and non-taxable income
Foreign income (expense) not includable in federal taxable income
Valuation allowance changes (net)
Changes in uncertain tax positions
Effect of U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act - deemed repatriation
transaction tax & GILTI
Effect of U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act - revaluation of deferred taxes
All other, net
Total income tax provision (benefit)
$
1.4
(13.6 )
0.9
(4.3 )
—
0.8
—
0.6
10.3 $
(0.8 )
0.2
(0.2 )
(2.9 )
(1.0 )
7.2
(10.6 )
1.0
(1.3 ) $
(0.7 )
(1.2 )
2.8
(2.6 )
(0.3 )
—
—
0.1
7.2
The U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Act”), enacted on December 22, 2017, significantly changes U.S. corporate income tax laws by, among other
things, reducing the U.S. corporate income tax rate to 21% starting in 2018 and creating a territorial tax system with a one-time mandatory tax on
previously deferred foreign earnings of U.S. subsidiaries. Under ASC Topic 740, the effects of changes in tax rates and laws on deferred tax balances are
recognized in the period in which the new legislation is enacted. As a result of the Act, we had recorded a benefit for the revaluation of our deferred tax
assets of $10.6 million during the fourth quarter of 2017 within the provision (benefit) for income taxes line of the Consolidated Statement of Operations.
The Act subjects a US shareholder to tax on global intangible low-taxed income (“GILTI”) earned by certain foreign subsidiaries. The FASB Staff
Q&A, Topic 740, No. 5, Accounting for Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income, states that an entity can make an accounting policy election to either
recognize deferred taxes for temporary basis differences expected to reverse as GILTI in future years or provide for the tax expense related to GILTI in the
year the tax is incurred. After considering the two options, the Company has elected to provide for the tax expense related to GILTI in the year the tax will
occur. For the year ending Dec. 31, 2018, we have included $0.5 million of tax expense related to GILTI.
89
The components of the deferred income tax assets and liabilities arising under FASB ASC 740, “Income Taxes” (“ASC 740”) were as follows:
Deferred tax assets:
AMT tax credit carryforwards
Post-retirement benefits other than pensions
Federal and foreign net operating loss carryforwards
State net operating loss carryforwards
Pension liability
Other deductible temporary differences
Less: valuation allowances
Deferred tax liabilities:
Fixed asset basis difference
Inventory basis difference
Other intangibles
Net deferred tax (liability) asset
At December 31,
2018
2017
(In millions)
$
$
$
$
30 $
18
51
20
48
54
(29 )
192 $
65 $
127
13
205
(13 ) $
30
15
59
19
46
27
(24 )
172
53
92
9
154
18
The deferred tax liability as of December 31, 2018 is included within Other noncurrent liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The Company
will continue to maintain a valuation allowance on certain U.S. federal and state deferred tax assets until such time as in management’s judgment,
considering all available positive and negative evidence, the Company determines that these deferred tax assets are more likely than not realizable.
The Company had available at December 31, 2018, federal AMT credit carryforwards of approximately $30 million, which as a result of the Act will
be refundable beginning in 2019 to the extent not utilized to offset future federal income tax liabilities of the Company.
The Company’s deferred tax assets also include $48 million related to U.S. federal net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards which expire in 20
years, $20 million related to state NOL carryforwards which expire generally in 1 to 20 years, and $5 million related to foreign NOL carryforwards which
expire in 1 to 5 years, available at December 31, 2018.
Earnings from the Company’s foreign subsidiaries are considered to be indefinitely reinvested and, accordingly, no provision for U.S. federal and
state income taxes or foreign withholding tax has been made in our consolidated financial statements related to the indefinitely reinvested earnings. At
December 31, 2018, the Company had approximately $112 million of undistributed foreign earnings, predominately in Canada and China. As a result of the
US Tax Cuts and Jobs Act passed during 2017, a significant portion of these earnings were deemed repatriated. At December 31, 2018, the Company has
recorded a $7.5 million US tax liability on this deemed distribution (“Transition Tax”). Of the $7.5 million tax expense, $0.8 million is reflected in our
deferred tax balances and $6.7 million is reflected in income taxes payable. Were the Company to distribute these non-U.S. earnings in the form of
dividends or otherwise in the future, it would no longer be subject to U.S. federal income taxes. A determination of the amount of any unrecognized
deferred income tax liability on the undistributed earnings is predominately dependent upon the applicability of foreign withholding taxes and potential
U.S. state income taxes. Modeling of the many future potential scenarios and the related unrecognized deferred tax liability is therefore not practicable.
None of the Company’s other foreign subsidiaries have a material amount of assets available for repatriation.
90
The Company accounts for uncertain income tax positions in accordance with ASC 740. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of
unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
Unrecognized tax benefits balance at January 1, 2016
Gross increases – tax positions in current periods
Settlements and closing of statute of limitations
Unrecognized tax benefits balance at December 31, 2016
Gross increases – tax positions in current periods
Settlements and closing of statute of limitations
Unrecognized tax benefits balance at December 31, 2017
Gross decreases – tax positions in current periods
Settlements and closing of statute of limitations
Unrecognized tax benefits balance at December 31, 2018
Unrecognized
Tax Benefits
(In millions)
7.6
—
(0.3 )
7.3
—
(1.0 )
6.3
—
(1.9 )
4.4
$
$
$
$
The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to U.S. federal income tax as well as income tax of multiple state and foreign jurisdictions. The
Company has substantially concluded all U.S. federal income tax matters for all years through 2009. Substantially all state and local income tax matters
have been concluded through 2006. The Company has substantially concluded foreign income tax matters through 2009 for all significant foreign
jurisdictions.
We recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. We had approximately $1.9 million of accrued interest
related to uncertain tax positions at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that would affect our
effective tax rate if recognized was $4.7 and $4.6 million as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Note 18: Earnings Per Share
On July 16, 2007, Ryerson Holding was capitalized with 21,250,000 shares of common stock by Platinum Equity, LLC. On August 13, 2014, Ryerson
Holding completed an initial public offering of 11 million shares of common stock at a price to the public of $11.00 per share. On July 25, 2016, Ryerson
Holding closed an underwritten public offering of 5 million shares of common stock at a price to the public of $15.25 per share. All shares outstanding are
common shares and have equal voting, liquidation, and preference rights.
Basic earnings per share attributable to Ryerson Holding’s common stock is determined based on earnings for the period divided by the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share attributable to Ryerson Holding’s common stock considers
the effect of potential common shares, unless inclusion of the potential common shares would have an antidilutive effect. Stock-based awards with a
grant price greater than the average market price of our common stock are excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share because the impact
would have been antidilutive. The weighted average number of shares excluded were zero, 100,068, and zero for the twelve-month periods ended
December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively.
The following table sets forth the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share:
Basic and diluted earnings per share
Numerator:
Years Ended December 31,
2018
2017
(In millions, except share and per share data)
2016
Net income attributable to Ryerson Holding Corporation
$
106.0
$
17.1
$
18.7
Denominator:
Weighted average shares outstanding
Dilutive effect of stock-based awards
Weighted average shares outstanding adjusted for dilutive securities
37,329,580
342,732
37,672,312
37,176,398
117,804
37,294,202
34,295,829
105,417
34,401,246
Earnings per share
Basic
Diluted
$
$
2.84
2.81
$
$
0.46
0.46
$
$
0.55
0.54
91
Note 19: Subsequent Events
In January 2019, a principal amount of $11.6 million of the 2022 Notes were repurchased for $11.8 million and retired, resulting in the recognition of
a $0.2 million loss.
RYERSON HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
SUMMARY BY QUARTER
(In millions except per share data)
Net Sales
Gross Profit
Income (Loss)
Before
Income
Taxes
Net Income
Net Income
Attributable
to Ryerson
Holding
Corporation
Basic
Earnings per
Share
Diluted
Earnings per
Share
$
$
$
$
814.5
875.4
864.2
810.6
3,364.7
941.3
1,057.1
1,250.0
1,160.0
4,408.4
$
$
$
$
160.6 $
140.4
145.0
136.5
582.5 $
164.9 $
185.3
208.2
199.7
758.1 $
21.8 $
—
1.2
(6.3 )
16.7 $
14.7 $
23.6
79.7
(1.3 )
116.7 $
15.0 $
0.8
1.9
0.3
18.0 $
10.6 $
17.4
77.7
0.7
106.4 $
14.8 $
0.6
1.7
—
17.1 $
10.4 $
17.5
77.5
0.6
106.0 $
0.40 $
0.02
0.05
—
0.46 $
0.28 $
0.47
2.08
0.01
2.84 $
0.40
0.02
0.05
—
0.46
0.28
0.46
2.06
0.01
2.81
2017
First Quarter
Second Quarter (1)
Third Quarter
Fourth Quarter
Year
2018
First Quarter
Second Quarter
Third Quarter (2)
Fourth Quarter (3)
Year
(1)
Included in the second quarter 2017 results is a $0.2 million charge due to an other-than-temporary impairment recognized on an equity investment.
(2) The third quarter 2018 includes a $73.2 million gain on bargain purchase related to our Central Steel and Wire acquisition.
(3) The fourth quarter 2018 includes a $3.2 million reduction to the gain on bargain purchase related to our Central Steel and Wire acquisition as well as a $1.7 million
loss on the repurchase of $50.5 million principal of the 2022 Notes.
92
SCHEDULE I—CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT
RYERSON HOLDING CORPORATION
(Parent Company Only)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In millions)
Administrative and other expenses
Interest income on intercompany loans
Equity in income of subsidiaries
Income before income taxes
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
Net income
2018
Year ended December 31,
2017
2016
$
$
(0.9 ) $
6.4
110.9
116.4
10.4
106.0 $
(0.8 ) $
6.5
23.6
29.3
12.2
17.1 $
(0.8 )
—
3.4
2.6
(16.1 )
18.7
See Notes to Condensed Financial Statements.
93
SCHEDULE I—CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT
RYERSON HOLDING CORPORATION
(Parent Company Only)
STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In millions)
Net income
Other comprehensive income (loss), before tax:
Foreign currency translation adjustments
Gain (loss) on intra-entity foreign currency transactions
Unrealized loss on equity investments
Other-than-temporary impairment on equity investments
Liquidation of investment in foreign entity
Gain on cash flow hedges
Changes in defined benefit pension and other post-retirement benefit
plans
Other comprehensive income (loss), before tax
Income tax provision (benefit) related to items of other comprehensive
income (loss)
Comprehensive income, after tax
2018
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
$
106.0 $
17.1 $
(8.2 )
(3.0 )
—
—
—
0.5
(22.3 )
(33.0 )
(4.5 )
77.5 $
5.4
3.2
(0.3 )
0.2
—
1.0
18.0
27.5
6.0
38.6 $
$
18.7
1.1
1.3
(1.8 )
4.7
1.2
—
(10.6 )
(4.1 )
(3.3 )
17.9
See Notes to Condensed Financial Statements.
94
SCHEDULE I—CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT
RYERSON HOLDING CORPORATION
(Parent Company Only)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In millions)
Operating Activities:
Net income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries
Deferred income taxes
(Increase) decrease in receivables/payables from subsidiaries
Increase in other assets
Increase (decrease) in accrued liabilities
Net adjustments
Net cash provided by operating activities
Investing Activities:
Loan to related company
Net cash used in investing activities
Financing activities:
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock
Net cash provided by financing activities
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents—beginning of period
Cash and cash equivalents—end of period
$
See Notes to Condensed Financial Statements.
95
2018
Year ended December 31,
2017
2016
$
106.0 $
17.1 $
18.7
(110.9 )
10.4
(5.4 )
(0.1 )
—
(106.0 )
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.1
0.1 $
(23.6 )
12.2
(5.6 )
—
—
(17.0 )
0.1
—
—
—
—
0.1
—
0.1 $
(3.4 )
(16.1 )
1.5
—
(0.5 )
(18.5 )
0.2
(71.7 )
(71.7 )
71.5
71.5
—
—
—
SCHEDULE I—CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT
RYERSON HOLDING CORPORATION
(Parent Company Only)
BALANCE SHEETS
(In millions, except shares)
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Prepaid expenses and other assets
Receivable from subsidiaries
Total current assets
Long-term receivable from subsidiaries
Deferred income taxes
Total assets
Liabilities
Accrued liabilities
Total current liabilities
Dividends in excess of investment in subsidiaries
Total liabilities
Ryerson Holding Corporation Stockholders’ equity (deficit)
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 7,000,000 shares authorized and no shares issued at
2018 and 2017
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized and 37,656,505
shares issued at 2018; 100,000,000 shares authorized and 37,421,081 issued at 2017
Capital in excess of par value
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)
Treasury stock at cost – Common stock of 212,500 shares in 2018 and 2017
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
Total Ryerson Holding Corporation stockholders’ equity (deficit)
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
At December 31,
2018
2017
0.1 $
0.1
9.5
9.7
71.7
23.4
104.8 $
0.1 $
0.1
31.5
31.6
—
0.4
381.0
14.2
(6.6 )
(315.8 )
73.2
104.8 $
0.1
—
4.1
4.2
71.7
33.8
109.7
0.1
0.1
119.6
119.7
—
0.4
377.6
(95.1 )
(6.6 )
(286.3 )
(10.0 )
109.7
$
$
$
$
See Notes to Condensed Financial Statements.
96
SCHEDULE I—CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT
RYERSON HOLDING CORPORATION
(Parent Company Only)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In millions)
Note 1: Basis of presentation
In the parent company only financial statements, Ryerson Holding’s investment in subsidiaries is stated at cost plus equity in undistributed
earnings of subsidiaries since the date of acquisition. Ryerson Holding’s share of net income (loss) of its unconsolidated subsidiaries is included in
consolidated income using the equity method. The parent company only financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s
consolidated financial statements.
Note 2: Guarantees
Ryerson Holding unconditionally guarantees the 2022 Notes, jointly and severally with the other guarantors of the 2022 Notes.
Note 3: Dividends from subsidiaries
There were no cash dividends paid to Ryerson Holding from its consolidated subsidiaries for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016.
97
RYERSON HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
SCHEDULE II—VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017, AND 2016
(In millions)
Year Ended December 31, 2018
Allowance for doubtful accounts
Valuation allowance—deferred tax assets
Year Ended December 31, 2017
Allowance for doubtful accounts
Valuation allowance—deferred tax assets
Year Ended December 31, 2016
Allowance for doubtful accounts
Valuation allowance—deferred tax assets
NOTES:
Balance at
Beginning
of Period
Additions
Charged
(Credited)
to Income
Deductions
from
Reserves
Balance
at End
of Period
$
$
$
4.9 $
24.4
4.6 $
20.0
5.2 $
22.6
2.4 $
7.0
1.5 $
4.4
3.1 $
(2.6 )
(4.8 ) (A) (B) $
(2.1 ) (C)
(1.2 ) (A) $
—
(3.7 ) (A) $
—
2.5
29.3
4.9
24.4
4.6
20.0
(A) Bad debts written off during the year of $1.8 million, $1.2 million, and $3.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively.
(B) Reclassed $3.0 million to contract liability as a result of ASC 606 adoption.
(C) Reversals of valuation allowances due to the expiration of state and foreign net operating losses.
98
ITEM 9.
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
None.
ITEM 9A.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules
and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures,
management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of
achieving the desired control objectives, and management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible
controls and procedures.
As required by SEC Rule 15d-15(b), we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including
the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures
pursuant to SEC Rule 13a-15 as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2018.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and Attestation Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm
The report of management on our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018 and the attestation report of our independent
registered public accounting firm on our internal control over financial reporting are set forth in Part II, "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data" in this report.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to
materially affect the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2018.
ITEM 9B.
OTHER INFORMATION.
None.
99
PART III
ITEM 10.
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statement for the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) within 120 days of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.
Code of Ethics
Our Board of Directors has adopted a Code of Ethics and Business Conduct applicable to all officers, directors, and employees, which contains
the ethical principles by which our chief executive officer, chief financial officer, and general counsel, among others, are expected to conduct themselves
when carrying out their duties and responsibilities. A copy of our Code of Ethics may be found on our Investor Relations website under “Governance
Documents” at http://www.ir.ryerson.com. Our website is not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report. We will provide a copy of our Code of
Ethics to any person, without charge, upon request, by writing to the Compliance Officer, Ryerson Holding Corporation, 227 West Monroe Street, 27th
Floor, Chicago, Illinois 60606 (telephone number (312) 292-5000). We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirement under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K regarding
an amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct by posting such information on our website at
http://www.ir.ryerson.com or by filing a Form 8-K with the SEC.
ITEM 11.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
Information concerning compensation of our executive officers and directors for the year ended December 31, 2018, is presented under the
captions “Executive Compensation,” “Compensation Tables,” and “Director Compensation” in our proxy statement. This information is incorporated
herein by reference.
Information concerning compensation committee interlocks is presented under the caption “Compensation Committee—Compensation Committee
Interlocks and Insider Participation” in our proxy statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
The report of our Compensation Committee can be found under the caption “Compensation Committee Report” in our proxy statement and is
incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 12.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
Information concerning the security ownership of certain beneficial owners as of February 28, 2019, is set forth under the caption “Stock
Ownership—Ownership of More Than 5% of Ryerson Stock” in our proxy statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
Information concerning the security ownership of our directors and executive officers as of February 28, 2019, is set forth under the caption “Stock
Ownership—Directors and Executive Officers” in our proxy statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans
Our stockholders have approved our 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan, or 2014 Plan, which is the Company’s only equity compensation plan.
100
Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans
The following table sets forth, as of December 31, 2018, information concerning equity compensation plans under which our securities are
authorized for issuance. The table does not reflect grants, awards, exercises, terminations, or expirations since that date.
Plan Category
Equity compensation plans approved by
security holders
Equity compensation plans not approved by
security holders
Total
Number of securities
to be issued upon
exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants, and rights (1)
(a)
Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding
options, warrants,
and rights (2)
(b)
Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in first column) (3)
(c)
888,989 $
—
888,989 $
—
—
—
399,506
—
399,506
(1) Includes (i) 618,930 shares of our common stock subject to performance units, which vest depending on continued employment or service
and the level of attainment of certain performance metrics, and (ii) 270,059 shares of our common stock subject to restricted stock units,
which vest depending on continued employment or service.
(2) Not applicable because all outstanding awards reflected in column (a) will be issued upon the vesting of outstanding restricted stock units.
(3) All of the shares of common stock that remained available for future issuance as of December 31, 2018, were available under the 2014 Plan.
Subject to certain express limits of the 2014 Plan, shares available for award purposes under the 2014 Plan generally may be used for any
type of award authorized under that plan including options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, and other
stock-based awards. The number of common shares reserved and available for delivery under the 2014 Plan is subject to adjustment.
ITEM 13.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.
Information concerning the independence of our directors, certain relationships, and related transactions during 2018, and our policies with
respect to such transactions is set forth under the captions “Board of Directors” and “Related Party Transactions” in our proxy statement and is
incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 14.
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.
Information concerning principal accountant fees and services is set forth under the captions “Items You May Vote On—Ratification of the
Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm,” “Audit Committee—Audit, Audit-Related, and Other Non-Audit Services,” and
“Audit Committee—Pre-Approval Policies” in our proxy statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
101
ITEM 15.
EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.
(a) Financial Statements and Schedules
PART IV
The following financial statements and schedules listed below are included in this Form 10-K:
Financial Statements (See Item 8)
Schedule I
Schedule II
All other schedules are omitted since the required information is not present or is not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the
schedules.
(b) Exhibits
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit
Number
2.1
3.1
3.2
4.1
4.2
4.3
Exhibit Description
Incorporated by Reference
Form
File No.
Filing Date
Filed
Herewith
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 4, 2018, by
and among Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc., Hunter
MergerCo, Inc., Central Steel and Wire Company, and Fortis
Advisors LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, solely in
its capacity as the Stockholder Representative thereunder.*
8-K
001-34735
June 5, 2018
Form of Third Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation of Ryerson Holding Corporation.
S-1/A-22
333-164484
August 6, 2014
Form of Amended and Restated Bylaws of Ryerson Holding
Corporation.
S-1/A-15
333-164484
May 6, 2013
Form of Common Stock Certificate of Ryerson Holding
Corporation.
10-K
001-34735
March 9, 2016
Indenture, dated as of May 24, 2016, by and among Joseph
T. Ryerson & Son, Inc., as Issuer, the Guarantors party
thereto, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as the
Trustee, relating to the Issuer’s 11.00% Senior Secured
Notes due 2022.
Form of Investor Rights Agreement, by and among Ryerson
Holding Corporation, Platinum Equity Capital Partners, L.P.,
Platinum Equity Capital Partners-PF, L.P., Platinum Equity
Capital Partners-A, L.P., Platinum Equity Capital Partners II,
L.P., Platinum Equity Capital Partners-PF II, L.P., Platinum
Equity Capital Partners-A II, L.P. and Platinum Rhombus
Principals, LLC.
8-K
001-34735
May 24, 2016
S-1/A-15
333-164484
May 6, 2013
10.1
General Security Agreement, dated October 19, 2007, by and
between Ryerson Canada, Inc. and Bank of America, N.A.,
as Canadian Agent.
S-4
333-152102
July 3, 2008
102
10.2
10.3
10.4
10.5
10.6
10.7
10.8
10.9
10.10
10.11
10.12
10.13
10.14
10.15
10.16
Ryerson Nonqualified Savings Plan.
S-4/A-2
333-152102
February 24, 2009
Ryerson Holding Corporation Retention Bonus Plan.
S-1/A-19
333-164484
June 24, 2014
Ryerson Annual Incentive Plan (as amended through June
14, 2007).
S-1
333-164484
January 22, 2010
Ryerson Holding Corporation 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan. S-1/A-21
333-164484
July 24, 2014
Offer Letter Agreement, dated May 7, 2015, by and between
Ryerson Holding Corporation and Edward J. Lehner.
8-K
001-34735
May 8, 2015
Confidentiality, Non-Competition and Non-Solicitation
Agreement, dated June 1, 2015, by and between Ryerson
Holding Corporation and Edward J. Lehner.
8-K
001-34735
June 5, 2015
Form of 2015 Restricted Stock Unit Agreement.
10-Q
001-34735
August 12, 2015
Form of 2015 Performance Unit Agreement.
10-Q
001-34735
August 12, 2015
Form of Director and Officer Indemnification Agreement.
S-1/A18
333-164484
March 27, 2014
Form of Participation Agreement for the Ryerson Holding
Corporation Retention Bonus Plan.
S-1/A-19
333-164484
June 24, 2014
Employment Agreement, dated December 10, 2004, between
Ryerson Tull, Inc. and Kevin D. Richardson, as amended.
10-Q
001-34735
May 7, 2015
Employment Agreement, dated January 3, 2005, between
Ryerson Tull, Inc. and Michael Burbach, as amended.
10-Q
001-34735
May 7, 2015
Directors Compensation Summary Sheet.
10-K
001-34735
March 9, 2016
Intercreditor Agreement by and between Bank of America,
N.A. as ABL Collateral Agent and Wells Fargo Bank,
National Association, as Notes Collateral Agent Dated as of
October 10, 2012.
Amendment No. 1, dated as of March 11, 2015, to the
Intercreditor Agreement dated as of October 10, 2012, by
and between Bank of America, N.A. as ABL Collateral Agent
and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Notes
Collateral Agent.
103
10-K
001-34735
March 9, 2016
10-K
001-34735
March 9, 2016
10.17
10.18
10.19
10.20
10.21
10.22
10.23
Joinder Agreement dated as of July 24, 2015, to Intercreditor
Agreement dated as of October 10, 2012 and amended as of
March 11, 2015 by and between Bank of America, N.A. as
ABL Collateral Agent and Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association, as Notes Collateral Agent.
Credit Agreement, dated as of July 24, 2015, among Ryerson
Holding Corporation, Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc.,
Sunbelt-Turret Steel, Inc., Turret Steel Industries, Inc.,
Imperial Trucking Company, LLC, Wilcox-Turret Cold
Drawn, Inc., Fay Industries, Inc., Ryerson Procurement
Corporation, Ryerson Canada, Inc., and each of the other
borrowers and guarantors, the lenders party thereto from
time to time, and Bank of America, N.A., as the
administrative agent and collateral agent.
Amendment No. 1, dated as of November 16, 2016, to the
Credit Agreement, dated as of July 24, 2015, by and among
Ryerson Holding Corporation, Joseph T. Ryerson & Son,
Inc., Ryerson Canada, Inc., and each of the other borrowers
and guarantors, the lenders party thereto from time to time,
and Bank of America, N.A., as the administrative agent and
collateral agent.
Security Agreement, dated as of July 24, 2015, Ryerson
Holding Corporation, Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc.
(“Ryerson”), and the domestic subsidiaries of Ryerson from
time to time party thereto in their capacities as pledgors,
assignors and debtors thereunder in favor of Bank of
America, N.A., in its capacity as collateral agent, as pledgee,
assignee and secured party for the benefit of the secured
parties.
Canadian Security Agreement dated as of July 24, 2015
between Ryerson Canada, Inc. and Bank of America, N.A., in
its capacity as collateral agent.
Canadian Security Agreement dated as of July 24, 2015
between Turret Steel Canada, ULC, and Bank of America,
N.A., in its capacity as collateral agent.
10-K
001-34735
March 9, 2016
8-K
001-34735
July 29, 2015
8-K
001-34735
November 17, 2016
10-K
001-34735
March 9, 2016
8-K
001-34735
July 29, 2015
8-K
001-34735
July 29, 2015
Employment Agreement, dated September 8, 2005, between
Ryerson Tull, Inc. and Erich Schnaufer, as amended.
10-K
001-34735
March 9, 2016
104
10.24
21.1
23.1
31.1
31.2
32.1
32.2
8-K
001-34735
June 29, 2018
Amendment No. 2, dated as of June 28, 2018 to Credit
Agreement dated as of July 24, 2015, among Ryerson
Holding Corporation, Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc.,
Wilcox-Turret Cold Drawn, Inc., Ryerson Procurement
Corporation, Southern Tool Steel, LLC, Ryerson Canada,
Inc., and each of the other borrowers and guarantors, the
lenders party thereto, and Bank of America, N.A., as the
administrative agent and collateral agent.
List of Subsidiaries of Ryerson Holding Corporation.
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
Certificate of the Principal Executive Officer of the Company,
as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
Certificate of the Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
Written Statement of Edward J. Lehner, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.**
Written Statement of Erich S. Schnaufer, Chief Financial
Officer, of the Company pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.**
101.INS
XBRL Instance Document.
101.SCH
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CAL
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.DEF
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
101.LAB
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
101.PRE
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase
Document.
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
* Schedules and exhibits have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. Ryerson agrees to furnish supplementally to the Securities
and Exchange Commission a copy of any omitted schedule or exhibit upon request, subject to Ryerson’s right to request confidential treatment of
any requested schedule or exhibit.
** Furnished herewith.
105
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Ryerson Holding Corporation has duly caused this
report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
SIGNATURES
RYERSON HOLDING CORPORATION
By: /s/ Erich S. Schnaufer
Erich S. Schnaufer
Chief Financial Officer (duly authorized signatory and
principal financial officer of the registrant)
Date: March 5, 2019
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature
/s/ Edward J. Lehner
Edward J. Lehner
/s/ Erich S. Schnaufer
Erich S. Schnaufer
/s/ Kirk K. Calhoun
Kirk K. Calhoun
/s/ Court D. Carruthers
Court D. Carruthers
/s/ Eva M. Kalawski
Eva M. Kalawski
/s/ Jacob Kotzubei
Jacob Kotzubei
/s/ Stephen P. Larson
Stephen P. Larson
/s/ Philip E. Norment
Philip E. Norment
/s/ Mary Ann Sigler
Mary Ann Sigler
Title
Date
President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
March 5, 2019
Officer)
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and
March 5, 2019
Principal Accounting Officer)
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
March 5, 2019
March 5, 2019
March 5, 2019
March 5, 2019
March 5, 2019
March 5, 2019
March 5, 2019
(Back To Top)
Section 2: EX-21.1 (EX-21.1)
106
Ryerson Holding Corporation, a Delaware corporation, owns, directly or indirectly, the following significant subsidiaries:
SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES OF RYERSON HOLDING CORPORATION
Name of Subsidiary
State or Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization
Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc.
Ryerson Procurement Corporation
Ryerson Canada, Inc.
Delaware
Delaware
Canada
Exhibit 21.1
Central Steel and Wire Company
Delaware
(Back To Top)
Section 3: EX-23.1 (EX-23.1)
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements: Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-202816) pertaining to
the Omnibus Incentive Plan of Ryerson Holding Corporation, Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-211966) of Ryerson Holding Corporation, and
Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-215381) of Ryerson Holding Corporation; of our reports dated March 5, 2019, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and schedules of Ryerson Holding Corporation and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Ryerson Holding
Corporation, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Ryerson Holding Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2018.
Exhibit 23.1
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Chicago, Illinois
March 5, 2019
(Back To Top)
Section 4: EX-31.1 (EX-31.1)
Exhibit 31.1
I, Edward J. Lehner, President & Chief Executive Officer, certify that:
CERTIFICATE OF THE
PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
1.
2.
3.
4.
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ryerson Holding Corporation;
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act rules 13a-15
(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under
our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s
internal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 5, 2019
Signature:
(Back To Top)
/s/ Edward J. Lehner
Edward J. Lehner
President & Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Section 5: EX-31.2 (EX-31.2)
Exhibit 31.2
I, Erich S. Schnaufer, as Chief Financial Officer, certify that:
CERTIFICATE OF THE
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
1.
2.
3.
4.
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ryerson Holding Corporation;
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act rules 13a-15
(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under
our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s
internal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 5, 2019
Signature:
/s/ Erich S. Schnaufer
Erich S. Schnaufer
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
(Back To Top)
Section 6: EX-32.1 (EX-32.1)
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002
In connection with the Annual Report of Ryerson Holding Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2018, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Edward J. Lehner, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.
Exhibit 32.1
/s/ Edward J. Lehner
Edward J. Lehner
President & Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
March 5, 2019
(Back To Top)
Section 7: EX-32.2 (EX-32.2)
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002
In connection with the Annual Report of Ryerson Holding Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2018, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Erich S. Schnaufer, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.
Exhibit 32.2
/s/ Erich S. Schnaufer
Erich S. Schnaufer
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Signature:
March 5, 2019
(Back To Top)