Saul Centers Inc.
Annual Report 2014

Plain-text annual report

2014 ANNUAL REPORT to Shareholders Saul Centers, Inc. is a self- managed, self-administered equity Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) headquartered in Bethesda, Maryland. Saul Centers operates and manages a real estate comprised of 59 portfolio properties which includes (a) 56 community and neighborhood shopping centers and mixed-use properties with approximately 9.3 million square feet of leasable area and (b) three land and development properties. Over 85% of the Company’s property operating income is generated by properties in the metropolitan Washington, DC/Baltimore area. Shops at Monocacy, Frederick, MD TOTAL REVENUE (In millions) NET INCOME Available to Common Stockholders (In millions) FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS* Available to Common Shareholders (In millions) $225 $200 $175 $173.9 $150 $163.1 $207.1 $197.9 $190.1 $35 $30 $25 $32.1 $125 $100 $75 $50 $25 $0 0 1 0 2 1 1 0 2 2 1 0 2 3 1 0 2 4 1 0 2 $21.6 $20 $18.2 $15 $10 $5 $0 $11.6 $11.7 0 1 0 2 1 1 0 2 2 1 0 2 3 1 0 2 4 1 0 2 $80 $70 $60 $50 $40 $30 $20 $10 $0 $78.3 $64.7 $60.1 $50.6 $50.3 0 1 0 2 1 1 0 2 2 1 0 2 3 1 0 2 4 1 0 2 * Funds From Operations (FFO) is a non-GAAP financial measure. See page 25 for a definition of FFO and reconciliation from Net Income. SAUL CENTERS, INC. PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION BASED ON 2014 PROPERTY OPERATING INCOME 76.6% Shopping Centers 23.4% Mixed-Use 85.0% Metropolitan Washington, DC/ Baltimore area 15.0% Rest of U.S. Year ended December 31, 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 Summary Financial Data Total Revenue $207,092,000 $197,897,000 $190,092,000 $173,878,000 $163,108,000 Net Income Available to Common Stockholders $ 32,102,000 $ 11,661,000 $ 18,234,000 $ 11,593,000 $ 21,623,000 FFO Available to Common Shareholders $ 78,281,000 $ 64,684,000 $ 60,100,000 $ 50,309,000 $ 50,556,000 Weighted Average Common Stock Outstanding (Diluted) 20,821,000 20,401,000 19,700,000 18,949,000 18,377,000 Weighted Average Shares and Units Outstanding 27,977,000 27,330,000 26,614,000 24,740,000 23,793,000 Net Income Per Share Available to Common Stockholders (Diluted) $ 1.54 $ 0.57 $ 0.93 $ 0.61 $ 1.18 FFO Per Share Available to Common Shareholders (Diluted) $ 2.80 $ 2.37 $ 2.26 $ 2.03 $ 2.12 Common Dividend as a Percentage of FFO 56% 61% 64% 71% 68% Interest Expense Coveragea 3.15 2.98 2.68 2.62 3.22 Property Data Number of Operating Propertiesb 56 56 57 58 55 Total Portfolio Square Feet 9,339,000 9,333,000 9,489,000 9,543,000 8,901,000 Shopping Center Square Feet 7,886,000 7,880,000 7,877,000 7,933,000 7,293,000 Mixed-Use Square Feet 1,453,000 1,453,000 1,612,000 1,610,000 1,608,000 Average Percentage Leasedc 94% 93% 91% 90% 91% (a) Interest expense coverage equals (i) operating income before the sum of interest expense and amortization of deferred debt expense, predevelopment expenses, acquisition related costs, and depreciation and amortization of deferred leasing costs divided by (ii) interest expense. (b) Excludes development parcels (Ashland Square Phase II and New Market from 2009 to 2012 and Ashland Square Phase II, New Market and Park Van Ness in 2013 and 2014). (c) Average percentage leased for 2014, 2013, 2012 and 2011 excludes Clarendon Center residential, which averaged 98%, 98%, 98% and 97% leased, respectively. 2014 ANNUAL REPORT 1 601 Pennsylvania Avenue, Washington, DC Overall portfolio occupancy improved to 94.4% as of December 31, 2014, a substantial increase from the low of 90.0% as of December 31, 2011. 2 SAUL CENTERS, INC. MESSAGE to Shareholders Throughout 2014, interest rates remained at historically low levels and the U.S. economy continued its slow and steady expansion. As a result, real estate fundamentals continued to improve. Both leasing rates and occupancy levels within the Saul Centers portfolio of shopping centers and mixed-use properties trended positive. Overall portfolio occupancy improved to 94.4% as of December 31, 2014, a substantial increase from the low of 90.0% as of December 31, 2011. Deal volume in 2014 was strong with 290 executed leases comprising 1.38 million square feet of retail and office space, a new historic high volume from our 287 leases in 2013. Small shop leasing percentage (in-line spaces less than 10,000 square feet) improved to 91.1% from 89.7% at the start of 2014 and our shopping centers ended the year with only two anchor tenant vacancies (spaces more than 25,000 square feet) out of 68 total anchors. New and renewal shopping center cash rents increased by 3.9% on a same space basis, the third consecutive year of rental rate improvement following the last recession. In addition, our office properties have recently experienced an increase in demand in our core submarkets. As of the end of February 2015, 93.4% of our 1.1 million square feet of commercial space in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area was leased, an increase from 90.3% as of December 31, 2014. Mixed-Use Performance The Company’s two largest assets as measured by property operating income are Clarendon Center and 601 Pennsylvania Avenue, which contribute over 69% of the mixed-use property operating income. Together, they consist of 390,000 square feet of office space with only 13,000 square feet vacant and only 9,000 square feet expiring during 2015 (without a new tenant commitment executed). This low amount of rollover space serves to minimize cash flow declines in our commercial space as office markets continue their recovery. While office demand has increased, office rents remain under pressure. During 2014, our base rental rates on 183,000 square feet of new and renewal office deals, on a same space basis, declined by 5.7%. On the residential side of our mixed-use portfolio, occupancy at Clarendon Center’s Lyon Place apartments continued at a strong monthly average of 97.7% during 2014, with rents improving by 2.7% over expiring levels. low interest today’s Shopping Center Results Consumer spending is the primary driver of the U.S. economy, accounting for over 65% of economic activity. With rate environment, an unemployment rate at 5.5%, and reduced gasoline prices, consumer confidence has improved, but has not yet translated into retail spending. Increased savings and, in the Washington, D.C. region, rising housing costs, appear to be suppressing growth in consumer spending. As a result, sales reported by our retail tenants remained unchanged compared to 2013 amounts. Despite the lack of growth, on a same space basis, our retail tenants’ sales averaged a healthy $340 per square foot, and grocery store sales, a large component of that number, averaged over $490 per square foot. Healthy tenant sales generally lead to higher tenant retention throughout the portfolio. During 2014, 75% of tenants with expiring base rents renewed their leases, second only to our 78% renewal rate in 2013. From 2008 through 2012, the average renewal rate was 68%. Higher tenant retention is desirable because rental income continues uninterrupted and tenant improvement and re- leasing costs are minimized. The recent recession negatively impacted the operating results of our Loudoun County, Virginia and Florida shopping centers to a greater extent than others. These nine grocery anchored shopping centers comprising 1.3 Clarendon Center, Arlington, VA Hunt Club Corners, Apopka, FL Lansdowne Town Center, Leesburg, VA Southdale, Glen Burnie, MD 2014 ANNUAL REPORT 3 million square feet of rentable space, produced over 12.9% of our 2014 property operating income. On a combined basis, the leasing percentages of these properties dropped from a 2007 pre-recession high of 96.2% to 90.5% in 2010. While rental rates remain under pressure, steadily improving market conditions have increased retail tenant demand, resulting in a leasing percentage of 93.8% at year-end 2014. While there continues to be steady job growth and modest wage inflation, we remain cautiously optimistic for the strength of real estate fundamentals looking into 2015. 2014 Operating Results Total revenue increased to $207.1 million in 2014, from $197.9 million in the prior year. Net income available to common stockholders was $32.1 million ($1.54 per diluted share) compared to $11.7 million in 2013. Two major items explained the majority of the $20.4 million improvement in 2014 net income available to common stockholders. The prior year’s higher predevelopment and depreciation charges related to the Park Van Ness project and higher redemption charges in 2013, arising from the initial issuance of our 6.875% Series C preferred stock, combined to contribute $15.1 million of the improvement in 2014 compared to 2013. Funds From Operations (FFO) available to common shareholders (after deducting preferred stock dividends and preferred stock redemption charges) increased 21.0% to $78.3 million ($2.80 per diluted share) from $64.7 million ($2.37 per diluted share) in 2013. Adjusting for the prior year’s higher Park Van Ness predevelopment charges and higher preferred stock redemption charges totaling $7.1 million, 2014 FFO per share increased by 8.7% over 2013 FFO. Same property operating income increased 4.4%, with shopping centers improving 5.4% and mixed-use properties growing by 1.2%. Same property results exclude operating income from properties not in operation for the entirety of the comparable reporting periods. Two property related events, both at the Seven Broadlands Village, Ashburn, VA 4 SAUL CENTERS, INC. BocaValley Plaza, Boca Raton, FL Park Van Ness, Washington, DC (artist’s rendering) Construction progress photo March 12, 2015 Corners shopping center, had a one-time positive impact on 2014 results: (1) a $1.6 million bankruptcy settlement and collection related to a former tenant and (2) a $0.7 million impact of a 50,000 square foot lease termination in order to accommodate the expansion of our very successful Home Depot store. Excluding these two events, overall same center property operating income increased 2.8% in 2014. Development & Construction Pipeline Our external growth strategy continued to focus on assembling land adjacent to Metro Stations in the metropolitan Washington, D.C. area. Since quality grocery-anchored shopping center acquisitions have been priced to extremes over the past few years, our acquisition program has focused on identifying and purchasing underutilized transit-oriented sites which provide zoning for mixed-use residential and commercial redevelopment. During 2014, we added 3.6 acres, currently operating as one- and two-story retail stores, to our holdings at the Twinbrook Metro Station along Rockville Pike in Montgomery County, Maryland. When combined with our adjacent 1500 Rockville Pike, the total 10.3 acres fronting Rockville Pike will support up to 1.2 million square feet of mixed-use development. We also acquired two contiguous sites on Glebe Road, totaling 2.3 acres, currently operating as single-level retail stores, conveniently located near the Ballston Metro Station in Arlington, Virginia. These sites have a combined mixed-use development potential of up to 450,000 square feet. Along with our prior 2010 through 2012 assemblage of 7.6 acres at the White Flint Metro Station, also along Rockville Pike in Montgomery County, Maryland, these three sites at Ballston, Twinbrook and White Flint provide us with a 10-plus year development pipeline. The construction schedule for over 3.0 million square feet of new mixed-use residential and commercial space will be determined by the site and building plan approval process and market conditions. Construction continues on Park Van Ness, our 224,000 square foot apartment/retail building. This new luxury apartment project has a prestigious and convenient location between Connecticut Avenue and the scenic and quiet Rock Creek Park, and is a short walk from the Metro’s Red Line Station at Van Ness. Construction is up to the 8th level of the 11-story building, and will include 271 apartments and 9,000 square feet of street-level retail. Amenities will include a rooftop swimming pool, community room, fitness center and several outdoor landscaped courtyards overlooking the park. Total development costs are estimated to be $93 million, with approximately $35 million expended as of March 1, 2015. Construction is scheduled to be substantially completed in the first quarter of 2016. 2014 ANNUAL REPORT 5 Thruway, Winston-Salem, NC Property Dispositions While we pride ourselves on acquiring and developing properties for a long-term hold within our portfolio, we have periodically disposed of an asset. Such dispositions occur when we determine the asset has limited cash flow growth potential or when it is not in our core market, and when attractive pricing is offered. During 2014, we sold the 70,000 square foot Giant shopping center, located in Baltimore, Maryland. This represented only our fourth property disposition in 22 years, with others located in Oklahoma, Kentucky and Baltimore. Balance Sheet Summary In late 2014, decreased U.S. Treasury yields again resulted in lowered rates on new issues of preferred stock. We took the opportunity to issue an additional $40 million of our 6-7/8% Series C preferred stock and used the proceeds to redeem all of our remaining outstanding 8% Series A preferred stock. As a result, our weighted average cost of preferred equity was reduced to 6.875% from 7.13%, a savings of $450,000 per year. We had no mortgage notes maturing in 2014. Because long term interest rates remained low, we decided to refinance all of our 2015 and a portion of our 2016 debt maturities. During the fourth quarter, we rate-locked two 15-year loans, totaling $46 million, with a weighted average interest rate of 3.79%. Subsequent to these loan closings, the weighted average interest rate of our debt will be 5.3%, with no fixed rate debt maturities scheduled prior to early 2018. Our Park Van Ness construction-to- permanent loan has begun funding, with substantially all of our cash equity requirement invested in the development as of March 1, 2015. Also during 2014, we extended the maturity of our revolving line of credit to June 2018 and reduced line interest costs by 0.20% while increasing the total available borrowings from $175 to $275 million. Our interest expense coverage grew to 3.14 times, as of December 31, 2014, and our leverage was a comfortable 34.2% debt to total capitalization. Our prudent corporate leverage and a total of $232 million of undrawn credit line availability as of March 1, 2015 combine to provide financial capacity available to fund our proposed future development activities. We continue to focus on long term cash flow appreciation and value creation through selective development and redevelopment with a geographic focus in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area and the 6 SAUL CENTERS, INC. We take pride in our 20-year success, derived from a well located in-fill portfolio of real estate assets and, more importantly, from our talented and driven team of professionals, who develop, lease and manage our properties. Southeastern U.S. This consistent strategy, continuing since our August 1993 initial public offering, has produced a 12.1% compounded annual return to our shareholders (including dividends) through December 31, 2014. Our Board recently approved a 7.5% increase in our quarterly common stock dividend to $0.43 per share. On an annualized basis, this dividend rate reflects a conservative 61% payout of 2014 FFO. During this 20-year period, we have also reduced leverage to 34% from 50%, as measured by debt to total capitalization, providing adequate funding capacity to continue our growth during the coming years. We take pride in our 20-year success, derived from a well located in-fill portfolio of real estate assets and, more importantly, from our talented and driven team of professionals, who develop, lease and manage our properties. For the Board, B. Francis Saul II March 16, 2015 Southdale, Glen Burnie, MD Kentlands Square, Gaithersburg, MD Village Center, Centreville, VA 601 Pennsylvania Avenue, Washington, DC 2014 ANNUAL REPORT 7 As of December 31, 2014, Saul Centers’ portfolio properties were located in Virginia, Maryland, Washington, DC, North Carolina, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and Oklahoma. Properties in the metropolitan Washington, DC/ Baltimore area represent 75% of the portfolio’s gross leasable area. PORTFO LIO PROPERTIES GROSS LEASABLE PROPERTY/LOCATION SQUARE FEET GROSS LEASABLE PROPERTY/LOCATION SQUARE FEET Shopping Centers Ashburn Village, Ashburn, VA 221,273 Olde Forte Village, Ft. Washington, MD 143,577 Olney, Olney, MD 53,765 Orchard Park, Dunwoody, GA 87,885 Ashland Square Phase I, Dumfries, VA 23,120 Palm Springs Center, Altamonte Springs, FL 126,446 Beacon Center, Alexandria, VA 358,071 Ravenwood, Baltimore, MD 93,328 BJ’s Wholesale Club, Alexandria, VA 115,660 11503 Rockville Pk / 5541 Nicholson Ln, Rockville, MD 40,249 Boca Valley Plaza, Boca Raton, FL 121,269 1500/1580/1582/1584 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 110,128 Boulevard, Fairfax, VA 49,140 Seabreeze Plaza, Palm Harbor, FL 146,673 Briggs Chaney MarketPlace, Silver Spring, MD 194,347 Marketplace at Sea Colony, Bethany Beach, DE 21,677 Broadlands Village, Ashburn, VA 159,734 Seven Corners, Falls Church, VA 574,831 Countryside Marketplace, Sterling, VA 137,662 Severna Park Marketplace, Severna Park, MD 254,174 Cranberry Square, Westminster, MD 141,450 Shops at Fairfax, Fairfax, VA 68,762 Cruse MarketPlace, Cumming, GA 78,686 Smallwood Village Center, Waldorf, MD 174,749 Flagship Center, Rockville, MD 21,500 Southdale, Glen Burnie, MD 484,035 French Market, Oklahoma City, OK 244,718 Southside Plaza, Richmond, VA 371,761 Germantown, Germantown, MD 27,241 South Dekalb Plaza, Atlanta, GA 163,418 730/750 N. Glebe Rd., Arlington, VA 18,874 Thruway, Winston-Salem, NC 362,056 The Glen, Woodbridge, VA 136,440 Village Center, Centreville, VA 146,032 Great Eastern, District Heights, MD 255,398 Westview Village, Frederick, MD 97,145 Great Falls Center, Great Falls, VA 91,666 White Oak, Silver Spring, MD 480,676 Hampshire Langley, Takoma Park, MD 131,700 Hunt Club Corners, Apopka, FL 101,522 Jamestown Place, Altamonte Springs, FL 96,341 Kentlands Square I, Gaithersburg, MD 114,381 Kentlands Square II, Gaithersburg, MD 247,783 Kentlands Place, Gaithersburg, MD 40,648 Lansdowne Town Center, Leesburg, VA 189,422 Leesburg Pike Plaza, Baileys Crossroads, VA 97,752 Lumberton Plaza, Lumberton, NJ 192,718 Metro Pike Center, Rockville, MD 67,488 Shops at Monocacy, Frederick, MD 109,144 Northrock, Warrenton, VA 99,789 8 SAUL CENTERS, INC. TOTAL SHOPPING CENTERS 7,886,304 Mixed-Use Properties Avenel Business Park, Gaithersburg, MD 390,683 Clarendon Center – North, Arlington, VA 108,387 Clarendon Center – South, Arlington, VA 293,565 (includes 244 apartments comprising 188,671 square feet) Crosstown Business Center, Tulsa, OK 197,127 601 Pennsylvania Ave., Washington, DC 227,021 Washington Square, Alexandria, VA 236,376 TOTAL MIXED-USE PROPERTIES 1,453,159 TOTAL PORTFOLIO 9,339,463 FINANCIAL SECTION TABLE OF CONTENTS Selected Financial Data ......................................Page 10 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations ...................................Pages 11-29 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk ..............................................Page 29 Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.............................................Page 29 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm........................................Page 30 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.............................................Page 31 Consolidated Balance Sheets ..............................Page 32 Consolidated Statements of Operations ...............Page 33 Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income ......................................Page 34 Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity............................................Page 35 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows ...............Page 36 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ...Pages 37-58 2014 ANNUAL REPORT 9 SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA (In thousands, except per share data) Years Ended December 31, 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 Operating Data: Total revenue $ 207,092 $ 197,897 $ 190,092 $ 173,878 $ 163,108 Total operating expenses 155,163 162,628 154,996 142,442 120,300 Operating income 51,929 35,269 35,096 31,436 42,808 Non-operating income: Change in fair value of derivatives (10) (7) 36 (1,332) — Loss on early extinguishment of debt — (497) — — (5,405) Gain on sale of property 6,069 — — — — Gain on casualty settlements — 77 219 245 2,475 Income from continuing operations 57,988 34,842 35,351 30,349 39,878 Discontinued operations — — 4,429 (55) 3,307 Net income 57,988 34,842 39,780 30,294 43,185 Income attibutable to the noncontrolling interest (11,045) (3,970) (6,406) (3,561) (6,422) Net income attributable to Saul Centers, Inc. 46,943 30,872 33,374 26,733 36,763 Preferred stock redemption (1,480) (5,228) — — — Preferred dividends (13,361) (13,983) (15,140) (15,140) (15,140) Net income available to common stockholders $ 32,102 $ 11,661 $ 18,234 $ 11,593 $ 21,623 Per Share Data (diluted): Net income available to common stockholders: Continuing operations $ 1.54 $ 0.57 $ 0.70 $ 0.61 $ 1.00 Discontinued operations — — 0.23 — 0.18 Total $ 1.54 $ 0.57 $ 0.93 $ 0.61 $ 1.18 Basic and diluted shares outstanding: Weighted average common shares - basic 20,772 20,364 19,649 18,889 18,267 Effect of dilutive options 49 37 51 60 110 Weighted average common shares - diluted 20,821 20,401 19,700 18,949 18,377 Weighted average convertible limited partnership units 7,156 6,929 6,914 5,791 5,416 Weighted average common shares and fully converted limited partnership units - diluted 27,977 27,330 26,614 24,740 23,793 Dividends Paid: Cash dividends to common stockholders (1) $ 32,346 $ 29,205 28,135 $ 27,062 $ 26,186 Cash dividends per share $ 1.56 $ 1.44 $ 1.44 $ 1.44 $ 1.44 Balance Sheet Data: Real estate investments (net of accumulated depreciation) $ 1,163,542 $ 1,094,776 $ 1,112,763 $1,091,448 $ 927,250 Total assets 1,266,987 1,198,675 1,207,309 1,192,569 1,013,888 Total debt, including accrued interest 860,601 823,328 831,121 835,459 713,997 Preferred stock 180,000 180,000 179,328 179,328 179,328 Total stockholders’ equity 339,257 315,126 307,289 293,206 239,813 Other Data: Cash flow provided by (used in): Operating activities $ 86,568 $ 73,527 $ 78,423 $ 55,669 $ 62,887 Investing activities $ (83,589) $ (26,034) $ (46,873) $ (201,500) $ (98,239) Financing activities $ (8,148) $ (42,329) $ (31,740) $ 145,186 $ 27,713 Funds from operations (2): Net income $ 57,988 $ 34,842 $ 39,780 $ 30,294 $ 43,185 Real property depreciation and amortization 41,203 49,130 40,112 35,298 28,379 Real property depreciation - discontinued operations — — 77 102 198 Gain on property dispositions and casualty settlements (6,069) (77) (4,729) (245) (6,066) Funds from operations 93,122 83,895 75,240 65,449 65,696 Preferred stock redemption (1,480) (5,228) — — — Preferred dividends (13,361) (13,983) (15,140) (15,140) (15,140) Funds from operations available to common shareholders $ 78,281 $ 64,684 $ 60,100 $ 50,309 $ 50,556 (1) During 2014, 2013, 2012, 2011, and 2010, shareholders reinvested $9.3 million, $20.7 million, $23.1 million,$19.8 million and $16.7 million, respectively, in newly issued common stock through the Company’s dividend reinvestment plan. (2) Funds from operations (FFO) is a non-GAAP financial measure and is defined in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Re- sults of Operations-Funds From Operations.” 10 SAUL CENTERS, INC. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) begins with the Company’s primary business strategy to give the reader an overview of the goals of the Company’s business. This is followed by a discus- sion of the critical accounting policies that the Company believes are important to understanding the assumptions and judgments incorporated in the Company’s reported financial results. The next section, beginning on page 14, discusses the Company’s results of operations for the past two years. Begin- ning on page 17, the Company provides an analysis of its liquidity and capital resources, including discussions of its cash flows, debt arrangements, sources of capital and financial com- mitments. Finally, on page 25, the Company discusses funds from operations, or FFO, which is a non-GAAP financial meas- ure of performance of an equity REIT used by the REIT industry. The MD&A should be read in conjunction with the other sections of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto beginning on page 32. Historical results set forth in Selected Financial Information and the Consolidated Financial Statements should not be taken as indicative of the Company’s future operations. OVERVIEW The Company’s principal business activity is the ownership, management and development of income-producing proper- ties. The Company’s long-term objectives are to increase cash flow from operations and to maximize capital appreciation of its real estate investments. The Company’s primary operating strategy is to focus on its community and neighborhood shopping center business and to operate its properties to achieve both cash flow growth and cap- ital appreciation. Management believes there is potential for long term growth in cash flow as existing leases for space in the Shopping Center and Mixed-Use Properties expire and are re- newed, or newly available or vacant space is leased. The Company intends to renegotiate leases where possible and seek new tenants for available space in order to optimize the mix of uses to improve foot traffic through the Shopping Centers. As leases expire, management expects to revise rental rates, lease terms and conditions, relocate existing tenants, reconfigure ten- ant spaces and introduce new tenants with the goals of increasing occupancy, improving overall retail sales, and ulti- mately increasing cash flow as economic conditions improve. In those circumstances in which leases are not otherwise expir- ing, management selectively attempts to increase cash flow through a variety of means, or in connection with renovations or relocations, recapturing leases with below market rents and re-leasing at market rates, as well as replacing financially trou- bled tenants. When possible, management also will seek to include scheduled increases in base rent, as well as percentage rental provisions, in its leases. The Company’s redevelopment and renovation objective is to selectively and opportunistically redevelop and renovate its properties, by replacing below-market-rent leases with strong, traffic-generating anchor stores such as supermarkets and drug stores, as well as other desirable local, regional and national tenants. The Company’s strategy remains focused on continuing the operating performance and internal growth of its existing Shopping Centers, while enhancing this growth with selective acquisitions, redevelopments and renovations. In December 2012, the Company purchased for $23.0 million, including acquisition costs, approximately 52,700 square feet of retail space located on the east side of Rockville Pike near the Twinbrook Metro station. In 2014, in separate transactions, the Company purchased three adjacent properties, with approx- imately 57,400 square feet of retail space, for an aggregate $25.2 million. Combined, the four properties total 10.3 acres and are zoned for up to 1.2 million square feet of rentable mixed-use space. The Company is actively engaged in a plan for redevelopment but has not committed to any timetable for commencement of construction. Also in 2012, the Company purchased, for $12.2 million, in- cluding acquisition costs, approximately 20,100 square feet of retail space located on the east side of Rockville Pike near the White Flint Metro station and adjacent to 11503 Rockville Pike, which was purchased in 2010. The property, when combined with 11503 Rockville Pike, will provide zoning for up to 331,000 square feet of rentable mixed-use space. When combining these two properties with our Metro Pike shopping center on the west side of Rockville Pike, the Company's holdings at White Flint total 7.6 acres which are zoned for a development potential of up to 1.5 million square feet of mixed-use space. The Company is ac- tively engaged in a plan for redevelopment but has not committed to any timetable for commencement of construction. During 2013, the Company completed negotiation of lease ter- mination agreements with the tenants of Van Ness Square. Costs incurred related to those termination arrangements were amortized to expense using the straight-line method over the remaining terms of the leases, are included in “Predevelopment Expenses” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations, totaled $2.7 million in 2012 and $3.3 million in 2013. The Company is in the process of developing a primarily residential project with street-level retail. In connection with the demolition of the existing structure, approxi- mately $580,000 and $503,000 of predevelopment expenses were recognized in 2013 and 2014, respectively. In 2014, in separate transactions, the Company purchased two adjacent properties, with approximately 18,900 square feet of retail space, on North Glebe Road in Arlington, Virginia, for an aggregate $42.8 million. Combined, the properties total 2.3 acres and are zoned for up to 450,000 square feet of rentable mixed-use space. The Company is actively engaged in a plan for redevelopment but has not committed to any timetable for commencement of construction. 2014 ANNUAL REPORT 11 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS In light of the limited amount of quality properties for sale and the escalated pricing of properties that the Company has been presented with or has inquired about over the past year, man- agement believes acquisition opportunities for investment in existing and new Shopping Center and Mixed-Use Properties in the near future is uncertain. Because of its conservative capital structure, including its cash and capacity under its revolving credit facility, management believes that the Company is posi- tioned to take advantage of additional investment opportunities as attractive properties are located and market conditions im- prove. (See “Item 1. Business - Capital Policies”). It is management’s view that several of the sub-markets in which the Company operates have, or are expected to have in the future, attractive supply/demand characteristics. The Company will continue to evaluate acquisition, development and redevelop- ment as integral parts of its overall business plan. During the most recent downturn in the national real estate mar- ket, which began in 2008, the effects on the office and retail markets in the metropolitan Washington, D.C. area, where the majority of the Company’s properties are located, were initially less severe than in many other areas of the country. Even though economic conditions in the local economies, where the majority of the Company’s properties are located, have improved over re- cent years, issues facing the Federal government relating to spending cuts and budget policies have resulted in continued el- evated vacancy rates in many sub-markets, thus pressuring rental rate growth. While overall consumer confidence appears to have improved, retailers continue to be cautious about new store open- ings. However, the Company’s overall leasing percentage, on a comparative same property basis, which excludes the impact of properties not in operation for the entirety of the comparable pe- riods, continues to improve and increased to 94.4% at December 31, 2014, from 93.9% at December 31, 2013. Because of the Company’s conservative capital structure, its liq- uidity has not been significantly affected by the recent turmoil in the credit markets. The Company maintains a ratio of total debt to total asset value of under 50%, which allows the Com- pany to obtain additional secured borrowings if necessary. As of December 31, 2014, amortizing fixed-rate mortgage debt with staggered maturities from 2015 to 2034 represented ap- proximately 91.5% of the Company’s notes payable, thus minimizing refinancing risk. The Company has one fixed-rate debt maturity scheduled for 2015 and which was refinanced on March 3, 2015. The Company’s variable-rate debt consists of a $14.5 million bank term loan secured by the Northrock shop- ping center, a $15.1 million bank term loan secured by the Metro Pike Center and $43.0 million outstanding under the un- secured revolving line of credit. As of December 31, 2014, the Company has loan availability of approximately $231.6 million under its $275.0 million unsecured revolving line of credit. 12 SAUL CENTERS, INC. Although it is management’s present intention to concentrate future acquisition and development activities on community and neighborhood shopping centers and office properties in the Washington, D.C./Baltimore metropolitan area and the south- eastern region of the United States, the Company may, in the future, also acquire other types of real estate in other areas of the country as opportunities present themselves. While the Com- pany may diversify in terms of property locations, size and market, the Company does not set any limit on the amount or percentage of Company assets that may be invested in any one property or any one geographic area. CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES The Company’s consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”), which requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reporting of financial position and results of operations. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this report. The Com- pany has identified the following policies that, due to estimates and assumptions inherent in those policies, involve a relatively high degree of judgment and complexity. REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS Real estate investment properties are stated at historic cost less de- preciation. Although the Company intends to own its real estate investment properties over a long term, from time to time it will evaluate its market position, market conditions, and other factors and may elect to sell properties that do not conform to the Com- pany’s investment profile. Management believes that the Company’s real estate assets have generally appreciated in value since their acquisition or development and, accordingly, the ag- gregate current value exceeds their aggregate net book value and also exceeds the value of the Company’s liabilities as reported in the financial statements. Because the financial statements are pre- pared in conformity with GAAP, they do not report the current value of the Company’s real estate investment properties. The Company purchases real estate investment properties from time to time and records assets acquired and liabilities assumed, including land, buildings, and intangibles related to in-place leases and customer relationships based on their fair values. The fair value of buildings generally is determined as if the buildings were vacant upon acquisition and subsequently leased at market rental rates and considers the present value of all cash flows expected to be generated by the property including an ini- tial lease up period. The Company determines the fair value of above and below market intangibles associated with in-place leases by assessing the net effective rent and remaining term of the in-place lease relative to market terms for similar leases at acquisition taking into consideration the remaining contractual lease period, renewal periods, and the likelihood of the tenant exercising its renewal options. The fair value of a below market lease component is recorded as deferred income and accreted MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS as additional lease revenue over the remaining contractual lease period. If the fair value of the below market lease intan- gible includes fair value associated with a renewal option, such amounts are not accreted until the renewal option is exercised. If the renewal option is not exercised the value is recognized at that time. The fair value of above market lease intangibles is recorded as a deferred asset and is amortized as a reduction of lease revenue over the remaining contractual lease term. The Company determines the fair value of at-market in-place leases considering the cost of acquiring similar leases, the fore- gone rents associated with the lease-up period and carrying costs associated with the lease-up period. Intangible assets as- sociated with at-market in-place leases are amortized as additional expense over the remaining contractual lease term. To the extent customer relationship intangibles are present in an acquisition, the fair value of the intangibles are amortized over the life of the customer relationship. From time to time the Company may purchase a property for future development purposes. The property may be improved with an existing struc- ture that would be demolished as part of the development. In such cases, the fair value of the building may be determined based only on existing leases and not include estimated cash flows related to future leases. If there is an event or change in circumstance that indicates a potential impairment in the value of a real estate investment property, the Company prepares an analysis to determine whether the carrying value of the real estate investment prop- erty exceeds its estimated fair value. The Company considers both quantitative and qualitative factors in identifying impair- ment indicators including recurring operating losses, significant decreases in occupancy, and significant adverse changes in legal factors and business climate. If impairment indicators are present, the Company compares the projected cash flows of the property over its remaining useful life, on an undiscounted basis, to the carrying value of that property. The Company as- sesses its undiscounted projected cash flows based upon estimated capitalization rates, historic operating results and market conditions that may affect the property. If the carrying value is greater than the undiscounted projected cash flows, the Company would recognize an impairment loss equivalent to an amount required to adjust the carrying amount to its then estimated fair value. The fair value of any property is sensitive to the actual results of any of the aforementioned estimated factors, either individually or taken as a whole. Should the ac- tual results differ from management’s projections, the valuation could be negatively or positively affected. When incurred, the Company capitalizes the cost of improve- ments that extend the useful life of property and equipment. All repair and maintenance expenditures are expensed when in- curred. Leasehold improvements expenditures are capitalized when certain criteria are met, including when we supervise con- struction and will own the improvement. Tenant improvements we own are depreciated over the life of the respective lease or the estimated useful life of the improvements, whichever is shorter. Interest, real estate taxes, development-related salary costs and other carrying costs are capitalized on projects under construc- tion. Once construction is substantially complete and the assets are placed in service, rental income, direct operating expenses, and depreciation associated with such properties are included in current operations. Commercial development projects are substantially complete and available for occupancy upon com- pletion of tenant improvements, but no later than one year from the cessation of major construction activity. Residential development projects are considered substantially complete and available for occupancy upon receipt of the certificate of occupancy from the appropriate licensing authority. Substan- tially completed portions of a project are accounted for as separate projects. Depreciation is calculated using the straight- line method and estimated useful lives of generally between 35 and 50 years for base buildings, or a shorter period if man- agement determines that the building has a shorter useful life, and up to 20 years for certain other improvements. DEFERRED LEASING COSTS Certain initial direct costs incurred by the Company in negoti- ating and consummating successful commercial leases are capitalized and amortized over the term of the leases. Deferred leasing costs consist of commissions paid to third- party leasing agents as well as internal direct costs such as employee com- pensation and payroll-related fringe benefits directly related to time spent performing successful leasing-related activities. Such activities include evaluating prospective tenants’ financial con- dition, evaluating and recording guarantees, collateral and other security arrangements, negotiating lease terms, prepar- ing lease documents and closing transactions. In addition, deferred leasing costs include amounts attributed to in-place leases associated with acquisition properties. REVENUE RECOGNITION Rental and interest income are accrued as earned except when doubt exists as to collectability, in which case the accrual is dis- continued. Recognition of rental income commences when control of the space has been given to the tenant. When rental payments due under leases vary from a straight-line basis be- cause of free rent periods or scheduled rent increases, income is recognized on a straight-line basis throughout the term of the lease. Expense recoveries represent a portion of property operating expenses billed to tenants, including common area maintenance, real estate taxes and other recoverable costs. Expense recoveries are recognized in the period when the ex- penses are incurred. Rental income based on a tenant’s revenue, known as percentage rent, is accrued when a tenant reports sales that exceed a specified breakpoint specified in the lease agreement. 2014 ANNUAL REPORT 13 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Same property revenue and same property operating income are used by management to evaluate and compare the operat- ing performance of our properties, and to determine trends in earnings, because these measures are not affected by the cost of our funding, the impact of depreciation and amortization ex- penses, gains or losses from the acquisition and sale of operating real estate assets, general and administrative ex- penses or other gains and losses that relate to ownership of our properties. We believe the exclusion of these items from revenue and operating income is useful because the resulting measures capture the actual revenue generated and actual expenses in- curred by operating our properties. Same property revenue and same property operating income are measures of the operating performance of our properties but do not measure our performance as a whole. Such meas- ures are therefore not substitutes for total revenue, net income or operating income as computed in accordance with GAAP. The tables below provide reconciliations of total revenue and operating income under GAAP to same property revenue and operating income for the indicated periods. The same property results include 49 Shopping Centers and six Mixed-Use properties for each period. SAME PROPERTY REVENUE Year ended December 31, (In thousands) 2014 2013 Total revenue $ 207,092 $ 197,897 Less: Interest income (75) (69) Less: Acquisitions, dispositions and development properties (2,103) (1,223) Total same property revenue $ 204,914 $ 196,605 Shopping centers $ 152,282 $ 144,502 Mixed-Use properties 52,632 52,103 Total same property revenue $ 204,914 $ 196,605 The $8.3 million increase in same property revenue for 2014 compared to 2013 was primarily due to (a) a $0.31 per square foot increase in base rent ($2.6 million) and (b) a 123,218 square foot increase in leased space ($2.2 million), (c) a bank- ruptcy settlement and collection related to a former tenant at Seven Corners ($1.6 million), (d) increased expense recovery income ($1.1 million) and (e) the impact of a lease termination at Seven Corners ($0.7 million). ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS – CURRENT AND DEFERRED RECEIVABLES Accounts receivable primarily represent amounts accrued and unpaid from tenants in accordance with the terms of the respec- tive leases, subject to the Company’s revenue recognition policy. Receivables are reviewed monthly and reserves are established with a charge to current period operations when, in the opinion of management, collection of the receivable is doubtful. In ad- dition to rents due currently, accounts receivable include amounts representing minimum rental income accrued on a straight-line basis to be paid by tenants over the remaining term of their respective leases. Reserves are established with a charge to income for tenants whose rent payment history or financial condition casts doubt upon the tenant’s ability to perform under its lease obligations. LEGAL CONTINGENCIES The Company is subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business, which are generally covered by insurance. While the resolution of these matters can- not be predicted with certainty, the Company believes the final outcome of current matters will not have a material adverse effect on its financial position or the results of operations. Once it has been determined that a loss is probable to occur, the esti- mated amount of the loss is recorded in the financial statements. Both the amount of the loss and the point at which its occurrence is considered probable can be difficult to determine. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Same property revenue and same property operating income are non-GAAP financial measures of performance and improve the comparability of these measures by excluding the results of properties which were not in operation for the entirety of the comparable reporting periods. We define same property revenue as total revenue minus the sum of interest income and revenue of properties not in opera- tion for the entirety of the comparable reporting periods, and we define same property operating income as net income plus the sum of interest expense and amortization of deferred debt costs, depreciation and amortization, general and administra- tive expense, loss on the early extinguishment of debt (if any), predevelopment expense and acquisition related costs, minus the sum of interest income, the change in the fair value of de- rivatives, gains on property dispositions (if any) and the results of properties which were not in operation for the entirety of the comparable periods. Other REITs may use different methodologies for calculating same property revenue and same property operating income. Accordingly, our same property revenue and same property op- erating income may not be comparable to those of other REITs. 14 SAUL CENTERS, INC. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS SAME PROPERTY OPERATING INCOME Year Ended December 31, (In thousands) 2014 2013 Net income $ 57,988 $ 34,842 Add: Interest expense and amortization of deferred debt costs 46,034 46,589 Add: General and administrative 16,961 14,951 Add: Depreciation and amortization of deferred leasing costs 41,203 49,130 Add: Predevelopment expenses 503 3,910 Add: Acquisition related costs 949 106 Add: Change in fair value of derivatives 10 7 Add: Loss on early extinguishment of debt — 497 Less: Gains on property dispositions (6,069) (77) Less: Interest income (75) (69) Property operating income 157,504 149,886 Less: Acquisitions, dispositions & development property (1,787) (719) Total same property operating income $ 155,717 $ 149,167 Shopping centers $ 118,817 $ 112,708 Mixed-Use properties 36,900 36,459 Total same property operating income $ 155,717 $ 149,167 Same property operating income increase d $6.5 million for 2014 compared to 2013 due primarily to (a) a $0.31 per square foot increase in base rent ($2.6 million) and (b) a 123,218 square foot increase in leased space ($2.2 million), (c) a bankruptcy settlement and collection related to a former tenant at Seven Corners ($1.6 million), (d) increased expense recovery income ($1.1 million) and (e) the impact of a lease termination at Seven Corners ($0.7 million) partially offset by (f) higher property operating expenses ($2.2 million). The following is a discussion of the components of revenue and expense for the entire Company. REVENUE Year ended December 31, Percentage Change (Dollars in thousands) 2014 2013 2012 2014 from 2013 2013 from 2012 Base rent $ 164,599 $ 159,898 $ 152,777 2.9 % 4.7% Expense recoveries 32,132 30,949 30,391 3.8 % 1.8% Percentage rent 1,492 1,575 1,545 (5.3)% 1.9% Other 8,869 5,475 5,379 62.0 % 1.8% Total revenue $ 207,092 $ 197,897 $ 190,092 4.6 % 4.1% Base rent includes $2.0 million, $3.0 million, and $3.8 million, for the years 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively, to recognize base rent on a straight-line basis. In addition, base rent includes $1.9 million, $1.7 million, and $1.5 million, for the years 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively, to recognize income from the amortization of in-place leases. Total revenue increased 4.6% in 2014 compared to 2013 pri- marily due to (a) a $0.43 per square foot increase in base rent ($3.7 million), (b) a 107,062 square foot increase in leased space ($1.9 million), (c) higher expense recoveries ($1.2 mil- lion), (d) a bankruptcy settlement and collection related to a former tenant at Seven Corners ($1.6 million) and (e) the impact of a lease termination at Seven Corners ($0.7 million). Total revenue increased 4.1% in 2013 compared to 2012 primarily due to $7.1 million of higher base rent (a) generated by prop- erties acquired or developed in 2012 (the "New 2012 Properties") ($2.3 million), (b) increases throughout the portfolio ($6.6 million) partially offset by (c) Van Ness Square ($2.0 mil- lion). A discussion of the components of revenue follows. 2014 ANNUAL REPORT 15 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS BASE RENT The $4.7 million increase in base rent in 2014 compared to 2013 was attributable to (a) a $0.30 per square foot increase in base rent ($2.6 million) and (b) a 107,062 square foot in- crease in leased space ($1.9 million). The $7.1 million increase in base rent in 2013 compared to 2012 was attributable to (a) the New 2012 Properties ($2.3 million) and (b) increases throughout the portfolio ($6.6 million) partially offset by (c) Van Ness Square ($2.0 million). EXPENSE RECOVERIES Expense recovery income increased $1.2 million in 2014 com- pared to 2013 primarily due to higher snow removal costs incurred in early 2014. Expense recovery income increased $0.6 million in 2013 compared to 2012. OTHER REVENUE Other revenue increased $3.4 million in 2014 compared to 2013 due primarily to (a) a bankruptcy settlement and collection related to a former tenant at Seven Corners ($1.6 million) and (b) a lease termination fee at Seven Corners ($1.9 million). Other revenue increased $0.1 million in 2013 compared to 2012. OPERATING EXPENSES Year ended December 31, Percentage Change (Dollars in thousands) 2014 2013 2012 2014 from 2013 2013 from 2012 Property operating expenses $ 26,479 $ 24,559 $ 23,794 7.8 % 3.2 % Provision for credit losses 680 968 1,151 (29.8)% (15.9)% Real estate taxes 22,354 22,415 22,325 (0.3)% 0.4 % Interest expense and amortization of deferred debt costs 46,034 46,589 49,544 (1.2)% (6.0)% Depreciation and amortization of deferred leasing costs 41,203 49,130 40,112 (16.1)% 22.5 % General and administrative 16,961 14,951 14,274 13.4 % 4.7 % Acquisition related costs 949 106 1,129 795.3 % (90.6)% Predevelopment expenses 503 3,910 2,667 (87.1)% 46.6 % Total operating expenses $ 155,163 $ 162,628 $ 154,996 (4.6)% 4.9 % Total operating expenses decreased 4.6% in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to $8.0 million of additional depreciation expense recorded in 2013 and $3.4 million of lower predevel- opment expenses related to Park Van Ness partially offset by $1.9 million of higher property operating expenses caused by snow removal costs in early 2014. Total operating expenses increased 4.9% in 2013 compared to 2012 primarily due to $8.0 million of additional depreciation expense and $1.2 mil- lion of higher predevelopment expenses related to the redevelopment of Park Van Ness. PROPERTY OPERATING EXPENSES Property operating expenses increased $1.9 million in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to a $1.5 million increase in snow removal costs. Property operating expenses increased $765,000 in 2013 compared to 2012. PROVISION FOR CREDIT LOSSES The provision for credit losses represents the Company’s esti- mate of amounts owed by tenants that may not be collectible. The $288,000 decrease in 2014 compared to 2013 as well as the $183,000 decrease in 2013 compared to 2012 reflect a general improvement in the retail economy and lack of signifi- cant bankruptcy losses among the Company’s various tenants. REAL ESTATE TAXES Real estate taxes decreased $61,000 in 2014 compared to 2013. Real estate taxes increased $90,000 in 2013 compared to 2012. 16 SAUL CENTERS, INC. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS INTEREST AND AMORTIZATION OF DEFERRED DEBT COSTS Interest expense decreased $0.6 million in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to a $0.5 million increase in the amount of interest capitalized. Interest expense decreased $3.0 million in 2013 compared to 2012 primarily due to a 30 basis point de- crease in the average cost of debt to 5.54% from 5.84%. DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION Depreciation and amortization of deferred leasing costs de- creased by $7.9 million in 2014 compared to 2013 and increased $9.0 million in 2013 compared to 2012 primarily due to $8.0 million of additional depreciation expense in 2013 on the building at the former Van Ness Square as a result of the re- duction of its useful life to four months effective January 1, 2013. GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE General and administrative costs increased $2.0 million in 2014 compared to 2013 primarily due to $1.1 million of ac- crued severance costs. General and administrative costs increased in 2013 compared to 2012 primarily due to (a) in- creased consulting expense ($495,000) and (b) increased stock option expense ($245,000). ACQUISITION RELATED COSTS Acquisition related costs in 2014 totaling approximately $0.9 million relate to the purchases of 1580, 1582 and 1584 Rockville Pike and 730 and 750 N. Glebe Road. Acquisition re- lated costs in 2013 totaling approximately $0.1 million relate to the purchase of a retail pad with a 7,100 square foot restau- rant located in Gaithersburg, Maryland which is contiguous with and an expansion of the Company's other Kentlands assets. Ac- quisition related costs in 2012 totaling approximately $1.1 million relate to the December 2012 purchases of 1500 Rockville Pike and 5541 Nicholson Lane. PREDEVELOPMENT EXPENSES Predevelopment expenses in 2014, 2013 and 2012 represent costs, primarily lease termination and demolition costs, incurred with the repositioning and redevelopment of Van Ness Square. GAIN ON CASUALTY SETTLEMENT Gain on casualty settlement in 2013 and 2012 reflect insurance proceeds received in excess of the carrying value of assets dam- aged during a hail storm at French Market in 2012. The insurance proceeds funded substantially all of the restoration of the damaged property. LOSS ON EARLY EXTINGUISHMENT OF DEBT On September 4, 2013, the Company closed on a 15-year, non-recourse $18.0 million mortgage loan secured by Seabreeze Plaza. The loan matures in 2028, bears interest at a fixed rate of 3.99%, requires monthly principal and interest payments totaling $94,900 based on a 25-year amortization schedule and requires a final payment of $9.5 million at matu- rity. Proceeds were used to pay off the $13.5 million remaining balance of existing debt secured by Seabreeze Plaza which was scheduled to mature in May 2014 and the Company incurred $497,000 of related debt extinguishment costs. GAIN ON SALES OF PROPERTIES Gain on sale of property in 2014 resulted from the April 2014 sale of Giant Center shopping center. Gain on sales of prop- erties in 2012 resulted from the July 2012 sale of West Park shopping center and the December 2012 sale of the Belvedere shopping center. IMPACT OF INFLATION Inflation has remained relatively low during 2014 and 2013. The impact of rising operating expenses due to inflation on the oper- ating performance of the Company’s portfolio would have been mitigated by terms in substantially all of the Company’s leases which contain provisions designed to increase revenues to offset the adverse impact of inflation on the Company’s results of op- erations. These provisions include upward periodic adjustments in base rent due from tenants, usually based on a stipulated in- crease and to a lesser extent on a factor of the change in the consumer price index, commonly referred to as the CPI. In addition, substantially all of the Company’s properties are leased to tenants under long-term leases, which provide for re- imbursement of operating expenses by tenants. These leases tend to reduce the Company’s exposure to rising property ex- penses due to inflation. Inflation and increased costs may have an adverse impact on the Company’s tenants if increases in their operating expenses exceed increases in their revenue. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES Cash and cash equivalents were $12.1 million and $17.3 mil- lion at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The changes in cash and cash equivalents during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 were attributable to operating, investing and financing activities, as described below. Year Ended December 31, (In thousands) 2014 2013 Net cash provided by operating activities $ 86,568 $ 73,527 Net cash used in investing activities (83,589) (26,034) Net cash used in financing activities (8,148) (42,329) Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents $ (5,169) $ 5,164 2014 ANNUAL REPORT 17 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OPERATING ACTIVITIES Net cash provided by operating activities increased $13.0 mil- lion to $86.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 compared to $73.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. Net cash provided by operating activities represents, in each year, cash received primarily from rental income, plus other income, less property operating expenses, normal recur- ring general and administrative expenses and interest payments on debt outstanding. INVESTING ACTIVITIES Net cash used in investing activities increased $57.6 million to $83.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 from $26.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. Investing activities in 2014 primarily reflect tenant improvements and cap- ital expenditures ($15.0 million), the Company's development activities ($17.8 million) and the acquisition of various retail real estate assets ($57.5 million). Net cash used in investing activities decreased $20.8 million to $26.0 million for the year ended De- cember 31, 2013 from $46.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. Investing activities in 2013 primarily reflect (a) tenant improvements and capital expenditures ($14.0 million), (b) the Company's development activities ($7.3 million) and (c) the acquisition of various retail real estate assets ($5.1 million). FINANCING ACTIVITIES Net cash used in financing activities was $8.1 million and $42.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respec- tively. Net cash used in financing activities in 2014 primarily reflects: • preferred stock redemption payments totaling $40.0 million; • the repayment of mortgage notes payable totaling $22.1 million; • the repayment of amounts borrowed under the revolving credit facility totaling $47.0 million; • distributions to common stockholders totaling $32.3 million; • distributions to holders of convertible limited partnership units in the Operating Partnership totaling $11.1 million; • distributions made to preferred stockholders totaling $13.5 million; and • payments of $1.3 million for financing costs of mortgage notes payable which was partially offset by: • proceeds of $39.3 million received from the sale of Series C preferred stock; • proceeds of $90.0 million received from revolving credit fa- cility draws; • proceeds of $8.9 million from the issuance of limited part- nership units in the Operating Partnership under the dividend reinvestment program; • proceeds of $15.6 million from the issuance of common stock under the dividend reinvestment program, directors deferred plan and the exercise of stock options; and • proceeds of $5.4 million received from construction loan draws. Net cash used in financing activities for the year ended Decem- ber 31, 2013 primarily reflects: • repayments of $180.0 million on the revolving credit facility; • preferred stock redemption payments totaling $139.3 million; • the repayment of mortgage notes payable totaling $71.3 million; • distributions to common stockholders totaling $29.2 million; • distributions to holders limited partnership units in the Oper- ating Partnership totaling $10.0 million • distributions to preferred stockholders totaling $14.6 million; and • payments of $3.2 million for financing costs of new mortgage loans; which was partially offset by: • proceeds of $135.2 million received from the sale of Series C preferred stock; • proceeds received from mortgage notes payable totaling $101.6 million; • proceeds of $142.0 million from revolving credit facility; • proceeds of $4.1 million from the issuance of limited part- nership units in the Operating Partnership under the divided reinvestment program; and • proceeds of $22.3 million received from the issuance of com- mon stock under the dividend reinvestment program and from the exercise of stock options. LIQUIDITY REQUIREMENTS Short-term liquidity requirements consist primarily of normal re- curring operating expenses and capital expenditures, debt service requirements (including debt service relating to addi- tional and replacement debt), distributions to common and preferred stockholders, distributions to unit holders and amounts required for expansion and renovation of the Current Portfolio Properties and selective acquisition and development of addi- tional properties. In order to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, the Company must distribute to its stockholders at least 90% of its “real estate investment trust taxable income,” as defined in the Code. The Company expects to meet these short-term liquidity requirements (other than amounts required for additional property acquisitions and developments) through cash provided from operations, available cash and its existing line of credit. 18 SAUL CENTERS, INC. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Long-term liquidity requirements consist primarily of obligations under our long-term debt and dividends paid to our preferred shareholders. We anticipate that long-term liquidity require- ments will also include amounts required for property acquisitions and developments. The Company is developing Park Van Ness, a primarily residential project with street-level retail. The total cost of the project, excluding predevelopment expense and land costs, is expected to be approximately $93.0 million, a portion of which will be funded with a $71.6 million construction-to-permanent loan and the remainder will be funded with the Company's working capital, including its existing line of credit. The Company may also redevelop certain of the Current Portfolio Properties and may develop additional freestanding out- parcels or expansions within certain of the Shopping Centers. Acquisition and development of properties are undertaken only after careful analysis and review, and management’s determi- nation that such properties are expected to provide long-term earnings and cash flow growth. During the coming year, devel- opments, expansions or acquisitions are expected to be funded with available cash, bank borrowings from the Company’s credit line, construction and permanent financing, proceeds from the operation of the Company’s dividend reinvestment plan or other external debt or equity capital resources available to the Company. Any future borrowings may be at the Saul Cen- ters, Operating Partnership or Subsidiary Partnership level, and securities offerings may include (subject to certain limitations) the issuance of additional limited partnership interests in the Operating Partnership which can be converted into shares of Saul Centers common stock. The availability and terms of any such financing will depend upon market and other conditions. CONTRACTUAL PAYMENT OBLIGATIONS As of December 31, 2014, the Company had unfunded con- tractual payment obligations of approximately $130.3 million, excluding operating obligations, due within the next 12 months. The table below shows the total contractual payment obligations as of December 31, 2014. Payments Due By Period (Dollars in thousands) One Year or Less 2 - 3 Years 4 - 5 Years After 5 Years Total CONTRACTUAL PAYMENT OBLIGATIONS Notes Payable: Interest $ 42,950 $ 80,005 $ 69,034 $ 135,069 $ 327,058 Scheduled Principal 23,192 48,175 48,311 135,752 255,430 Balloon Payments 14,885 28,879 131,542 426,652 601,958 Subtotal 81,027 157,059 248,887 697,473 1,184,446 Ground Leases (1) 176 352 353 9,186 10,067 Corporate Headquarters Lease (1) 894 1,839 — — 2,733 Development Obligations 38,949 9,738 — — 48,687 Tenant Improvements 9,270 1,744 277 — 11,291 Total Contractual Obligations $ 130,316 $ 170,732 $ 249,517 $ 706,659 $ 1,257,224 (1) See Note 7 to Consolidated Financial Statements. Corporate Headquarters Lease amounts represent an allocation to the Company based upon employees’ time dedicated to the Company’s business as specified in the Shared Services Agreement. Future amounts are subject to change as the number of employees employed by each of the parties to the lease fluctuates. Management believes that the Company’s cash flow from op- erations and its capital resources, which at December 31, 2014, included cash balances of $12.1 million and borrowing avail- ability of approximately $231.6 million on its revolving line of credit, will be sufficient to meet its contractual obligations for the foreseeable future. 2014 ANNUAL REPORT 19 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS PREFERRED STOCK ISSUES In March 2013, the Company redeemed 60% of its then-out- standing 8% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (the “Series A Stock”) and all of its 9% Series B Cumulative Re- deemable Preferred Stock. In December 2014, the Company redeemed the remaining outstanding Series A Stock. In February 2013, the Company sold, in an underwritten public offering, 5.6 million depositary shares, each representing 1/100th of a share of 6.875% Series C Cumulative Re- deemable Preferred Stock (the "Series C Stock"), providing net cash proceeds of approximately $135.2 million. The depositary shares may be redeemed at the Company’s option, in whole or in part, at the $25.00 liquidation preference plus accrued but unpaid dividends on or after February 12, 2018. The depositary shares pay an annual dividend of $1.71875 per share, equiv- alent to 6.875% of the $25.00 liquidation preference. The first dividend was paid on April 15, 2013 and covered the period from February 12, 2013 through March 31, 2013. The Series C Stock has no stated maturity, is not subject to any sinking fund or mandatory redemption and is not convertible into any other securities of the Company except in connection with certain changes of control or delisting events. Investors in the depositary shares generally have no voting rights, but will have limited vot- ing rights if the Company fails to pay dividends for six or more quarters (whether or not declared or consecutive) and in certain other events. In November 2014, the Company sold, in an underwritten pub- lic offering, 1.6 million depositary shares of the Series C Stock (the "Additional Series C Stock"). The Company received pro- ceeds of approximately $39.3 million from the offering and used the proceeds to redeem its outstanding Series A Stock. The Additional Series C Stock represents a new issuance of addi- tional depositary shares representing shares of Series C Stock. DIVIDEND REINVESTMENTS In December 1995, the Company established a Dividend Rein- vestment Plan (the “Plan”) to allow its common stockholders and holders of limited partnership interests an opportunity to buy ad- ditional shares of common stock by reinvesting all or a portion of their dividends or distributions. The Plan provides for investing in newly issued shares of common stock at a 3% discount from market price without payment of any brokerage commissions, service charges or other expenses. All expenses of the Plan are paid by the Company. The Company issued 190,177 and 468,014 shares under the Plan at a weighted average dis- counted price of $46.85 and $43.52 per share during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The Com- pany issued 196,183 and 88,309 limited partnership units under the Plan at a weighted average price of $45.25 and $46.93 per unit during the year ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The Company also credited 7,461 and 7,148 shares to directors pursuant to the reinvestment of divi- dends specified by the Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan at a weighted average discounted price of $47.08 and $43.92 per share, during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. CAPITAL STRATEGY AND FINANCING ACTIVITY As a general policy, the Company intends to maintain a ratio of its total debt to total asset value of 50% or less and to actively manage the Company’s leverage and debt expense on an on- going basis in order to maintain prudent coverage of fixed charges. Asset value is the aggregate fair market value of the Current Portfolio Properties and any subsequently acquired properties as reasonably determined by management by refer- ence to the properties’ aggregate cash flow. Given the Company’s current debt level, it is management’s belief that the ratio of the Company’s debt to total asset value was below 50% as of December 31, 2014. The organizational documents of the Company do not limit the absolute amount or percentage of indebtedness that it may incur. The Board of Directors may, from time to time, reevaluate the Company’s debt capitalization policy in light of current eco- nomic conditions, relative costs of capital, market values of the Company property portfolio, opportunities for acquisition, de- velopment or expansion, and such other factors as the Board of Directors then deems relevant. The Board of Directors may modify the Company’s debt capitalization policy based on such a reevaluation without shareholder approval and consequently, may increase or decrease the Company’s debt to total asset ratio above or below 50% or may waive the policy for certain periods of time. The Company selectively continues to refinance or renegotiate the terms of its outstanding debt in order to achieve longer maturities, and obtain generally more favorable loan terms, whenever management determines the financing environment is favorable. 20 SAUL CENTERS, INC. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The following is a summary of notes payable as of December 31, 2014 and 2013: NOTES PAYABLE Year Ended December 31, Interest Scheduled (Dollars in thousands) 2014 2013 Rate* Maturity* Fixed rate mortgages: $ 15,399 (a) $ 16,128 7.45% Jun-2015 32,049 (b) 33,246 6.01% Feb-2018 35,398 (c) 36,937 5.88% Jan-2019 11,454 (d) 11,949 5.76% May-2019 15,819 (e) 16,501 5.62% Jul-2019 15,761 (f) 16,419 5.79% Sep-2019 14,014 (g) 14,610 5.22% Jan-2020 10,881 (h) 11,159 5.60% May-2020 9,535 (i) 9,921 5.30% Jun-2020 41,441 (j) 42,462 5.83% Jul-2020 8,346 (k) 8,649 5.81% Feb-2021 6,100 (l) 6,233 6.01% Aug-2021 35,222 (m) 35,981 5.62% Jun-2022 10,718 (n) 10,930 6.08% Sep-2022 11,587 (o) 11,795 6.43% Apr-2023 14,909 (p) 15,598 6.28% Feb-2024 16,750 (q) 17,123 7.35% Jun-2024 14,535 (r) 14,849 7.60% Jun-2024 25,639 (s) 26,153 7.02% Jul-2024 30,429 (t) 31,093 7.45% Jul-2024 30,253 (u) 30,894 7.30% Jan-2025 15,735 (v) 16,087 6.18% Jan-2026 115,291 (w) 118,128 5.31% Apr-2026 35,125 (x) 36,075 4.30% Oct-2026 39,932 (y) 40,974 4.53% Nov-2026 18,645 (z) 19,118 4.70% Dec-2026 69,397 (aa) 70,856 5.84% May-2027 17,281 (bb) 17,718 4.04% Apr-2028 33,140 (cc) 34,391 3.51% Jun-2028 17,462 (dd) 17,895 3.99% Sep-2028 5,391 (ee) — 4.88% Sep-2032 11,119 (ff) — 8.00% Apr-2034 Total fixed rate 784,757 789,872 5.70% 9.3 Years Variable rate loans: 43,000 (gg) — LIBOR + 1.45% Jun-2018 14,525 (hh) 14,802 LIBOR + 1.65% Feb-2016 15,106 (ii) 15,394 LIBOR + 1.65% Feb-2016 Total variable rate 72,631 30,196 LIBOR + 1.53% 2.5 Years Total notes payable $ 857,388 $ 820,068 5.36% 8.7 Years * Interest rate and scheduled maturity data presented as of December 31, 2014. Totals computed using weighted averages. 2014 ANNUAL REPORT 21 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (a) The loan is collateralized by Shops at Fairfax and Boulevard shopping cen- ters and requires equal monthly principal and interest payments totaling $156,000 based upon a weighted average 23-year amortization schedule and a final payment of $15.2 million is due at loan maturity. Principal of $729,000 was amortized during 2014. (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (b) The loan is collateralized by Washington Square and requires equal monthly principal and interest payments of $264,000 based upon a 27.5- year amortization schedule and a final payment of $28.0 million at loan maturity. Principal of $1.2 million was amortized during 2014. The loan is collateralized by three shopping centers, Broadlands Village, The Glen and Kentlands Square I, and requires equal monthly principal and interest payments of $306,000 based upon a 25-year amortization schedule and a final payment of $28.4 million at loan maturity. Principal of $1.5 million was amortized during 2014. The loan is collateralized by Olde Forte Village and requires equal monthly principal and interest payments of $98,000 based upon a 25-year amor- tization schedule and a final payment of $9.0 million at loan maturity. Principal of $495,000 was amortized during 2014. The loan is collateralized by Countryside and requires equal monthly prin- cipal and interest payments of $133,000 based upon a 25-year amortization schedule and a final payment of $12.3 million at loan ma- turity. Principal of $682,000 was amortized during 2014. The loan is collateralized by Briggs Chaney MarketPlace and requires equal monthly principal and interest payments of $133,000 based upon a 25-year amortization schedule and a final payment of $12.2 million at loan maturity. Principal of $658,000 was amortized during 2014. The loan is collateralized by Shops at Monocacy and requires equal monthly principal and interest payments of $112,000 based upon a 25- year amortization schedule and a final payment of $10.6 million at loan maturity. Principal of $596,000 was amortized during 2014. The loan is collateralized by Boca Valley Plaza and requires equal monthly principal and interest payments of $75,000 based upon a 30-year amor- tization schedule and a final payment of $9.1 million at loan maturity. Principal of $278,000 was amortized during 2014. The loan is collateralized by Palm Springs Center and requires equal monthly principal and interest payments of $75,000 based upon a 25- year amortization schedule and a final payment of $7.1 million at loan maturity. Principal of $386,000 was amortized during 2014. The loan and a corresponding interest-rate swap closed on June 29, 2010 and are collateralized by Thruway. On a combined basis, the loan and the interest-rate swap require equal monthly principal and interest pay- ments of $289,000 based upon a 25-year amortization schedule and a final payment of $34.8 million at loan maturity. Principal of $1,021,000 was amortized during 2014. The loan is collateralized by Jamestown Place and requires equal monthly principal and interest payments of $66,000 based upon a 25-year amor- tization schedule and a final payment of $6.1 million at loan maturity. Principal of $303,000 was amortized during 2014. The loan is collateralized by Hunt Club Corners and requires equal monthly principal and interest payments of $42,000 based upon a 30- year amortization schedule and a final payment of $5.0 million, at loan maturity. Principal of $133,000 was amortized during 2014. (k) (l) (i) (j) (n) (m) The loan is collateralized by Lansdowne Town Center and requires monthly principal and interest payments of $230,000 based on a 30-year amor- tization schedule and a final payment of $28.2 million at loan maturity. Principal of $759,000 was amortized during 2014. The loan is collateralized by Orchard Park and requires equal monthly principal and interest payments of $73,000 based upon a 30-year amor- tization schedule and a final payment of $8.6 million at loan maturity. Principal of $212,000 was amortized during 2014. The loan is collateralized by BJ’s Wholesale and requires equal monthly principal and interest payments of $80,000 based upon a 30-year amor- tization schedule and a final payment of $9.3 million at loan maturity. Principal of $208,000 was amortized during 2014. (o) 22 SAUL CENTERS, INC. (p) (q) (r) (s) (t) (u) (v) (w) (x) (y) (z) The loan is collateralized by Great Falls shopping center. The loan consists of three notes which require equal monthly principal and interest payments of $138,000 based upon a weighted average 26-year amortization schedule and a final payment of $6.3 million at maturity. Principal of $689,000 was amortized during 2014. The loan is collateralized by Leesburg Pike and requires equal monthly principal and interest payments of $135,000 based upon a 25-year amor- tization schedule and a final payment of $11.5 million at loan maturity. Principal of $373,000 was amortized during 2014. The loan is collateralized by Village Center and requires equal monthly principal and interest payments of $119,000 based upon a 25-year amor- tization schedule and a final payment of $10.1 million at loan maturity. Principal of $314,000 was amortized during 2014. The loan is collateralized by White Oak and requires equal monthly prin- cipal and interest payments of $193,000 based upon a 24.4 year weighted amortization schedule and a final payment of $18.5 million at loan maturity. The loan was previously collateralized by Van Ness Square. During 2012, the Company substituted White Oak as the collateral and borrowed an additional $10.5 million. Principal of $514,000 was amor- tized during 2014. The loan is collateralized by Avenel Business Park and requires equal monthly principal and interest payments of $246,000 based upon a 25- year amortization schedule and a final payment of $20.9 million at loan maturity. Principal of $664,000 was amortized during 2014. The loan is collateralized by Ashburn Village and requires equal monthly principal and interest payments of $240,000 based upon a 25-year amor- tization schedule and a final payment of $20.5 million at loan maturity. Principal of $641,000 was amortized during 2014. The loan is collateralized by Ravenwood and requires equal monthly prin- cipal and interest payments of $111,000 based upon a 25-year amortization schedule and a final payment of $10.1 million at loan ma- turity. Principal of $352,000 was amortized during 2014. The loan is collateralized by Clarendon Center and requires equal monthly principal and interest payments of $753,000 based upon a 25-year amor- tization schedule and a final payment of $70.5 million at loan maturity. Principal of $2.8 million was amortized during 2014. The loan is collateralized by Severna Park MarketPlace and requires equal monthly principal and interest payments of $207,000 based upon a 25- year amortization schedule and a final payment of $20.3 million at loan maturity. Principal of $950,000 was amortized during 2014. The loan is collateralized by Kentlands Square II and requires equal monthly principal and interest payments of $240,000 based upon a 25- year amortization schedule and a final payment of $23.1 million at loan maturity. Principal of $1,042,000 was amortized during 2014. The loan is collateralized by Cranberry Square and requires equal monthly principal and interest payments of $113,000 based upon a 25-year amor- tization schedule and a final payment of $10.9 million at loan maturity. Principal of $473,000 was amortized during 2014. (aa) The loan in the original amount of $73.0 million closed in May 2012, is collateralized by Seven Corners and requires equal monthly principal and interest payments of $463,200 based upon a 25-year amortization sched- ule and a final payment of $42.3 million at loan maturity. Principal of $1.5 million was amortized during 2014. (bb) The loan is collateralized by Hampshire Langley and requires equal monthly principal and interest payments of $95,400 based upon a 25 - year amortization schedule and a final payment of $9.5 million at loan maturity. Principal of $437,000 was amortized in 2014. (cc) The loan is collateralized by Beacon Center and requires equal monthly principal and interest payments of $203,200 based upon a 20-year amor- tization schedule and a final payment of $11.4 million at loan maturity. Principal of $1,251,000 was amortized in 2014. (dd) The loan is collateralized by Seabreeze Plaza and requires equal monthly principal and interest payments of $94,900 based upon a 25-year amor- tization schedule and a final payment of $9.5 million at loan maturity. Principal of $433,000 was amortized in 2014. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (ee) The loan is a $71.6 million construction-to-permanent facility that is col- lateralized by and will finance a portion of the construction costs of Park Van Ness. During the construction period, interest will be funded by the loan. After conversion to a permanent loan, monthly principal and interest payments totaling $413,500 will be required based upon a 25-year amor- tization schedule. A final payment of $39.6 million will be due at maturity. The Company entered into a sale-leaseback transaction with its Olney prop- erty and is accounting for that transaction as a secured financing. The arrangement requires monthly payments of $60,400 which increase by 1.5% on May 1, 2015, and every May 1 thereafter. The arrangement pro- vides for a final payment of $14.7 million and has an implicit interest rate of 8.0%. Negative amortization in 2014 totaled $119,000. (ff) The carrying value of properties collateralizing the mortgage notes payable totaled $895.5 million and $907.2 million as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The Company’s credit facility requires the Company and its subsidiaries to main- tain certain financial covenants, which are summarized below. As of December 31, 2014, the Company was in compliance with all such covenants: • maintain tangible net worth, as defined in the loan agree- ment, of at least $542.1 million plus 80% of the Company’s net equity proceeds received after March 2014; • • • limit the amount of debt as a percentage of gross asset value, as defined in the loan agreement, to less than 60% (leverage ratio); limit the amount of debt so that interest coverage will ex- ceed 2.0x on a trailing four-quarter basis (interest expense coverage); and limit the amount of debt so that interest, scheduled principal amortization and preferred dividend coverage exceeds 1.3x on a trailing four-quarter basis (fixed charge coverage). 2015 FINANCING ACTIVITY On March 3, 2015, the Company closed a 15-year, $30.0 mil- lion non-recourse mortgage loan secured by Boulevard and Shops at Fairfax shopping centers in Fairfax, Virginia. The loan matures in 2030, bears interest at a fixed rate of 3.69%, re- quires monthly principal and interest payments totaling $153,300 based on a 25-year amortization schedule and a final payment of $15.5 million at maturity. Proceeds of the loan were used to repay in full the existing 7.45% mortgage in the amount of $15.2 million, which was scheduled to mature in June 2015 and to pay down outstanding balances under the revolving credit facility. (gg) The loan is a $275.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility. Interest accrues at a rate equal to the sum of one-month LIBOR plus a spread of 145 basis points. The line may be extended at the Company’s option for one year with payment of a fee of 0.15%. Monthly payments, if required, are interest only and vary depending upon the amount outstanding and the applicable interest rate for any given month. (ii) (hh) The loan is collateralized by Northrock and requires monthly principal and interest payments of approximately $47,000 and a final payment of $14.2 million at maturity. Principal of $277,000 was amortized during 2014. The loan is collateralized by Metro Pike Center and requires monthly prin- cipal and interest payments of approximately $48,000 and a final payment of $14.8 million at loan maturity. Principal of $288,000 was amortized during 2014. 2014 FINANCING ACTIVITY On June 24, 2014, the Company amended and restated its re- volving credit facility. The unsecured revolving credit facility, which can be used for working capital, property acquisitions, development projects or letters of credit was increased to $275.0 million. The revolving credit facility matures on June 23, 2018, and may be extended by the Company for one ad- ditional year subject to the Company’s satisfaction of certain conditions. Saul Centers and certain consolidated subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership have guaranteed the payment ob- ligations of the Operating Partnership under the revolving credit facility. Letters of credit may be issued under the revolving credit facility. The interest rate under the facility is variable and equals the sum of one-month LIBOR and a margin that is based on the Company’s leverage ratio, and which can range from 145 basis points to 200 basis points. 2013 FINANCING ACTIVITY On February 27, 2013, the Company closed on a three-year $15.6 million mortgage loan secured by Metro Pike Center. The loan matures in 2016, bears interest at a variable rate equal to the sum of one-month LIBOR and 165 basis points, requires monthly principal and interest payments based on a 25-year amortization schedule and requires a final payment of $14.8 million at maturity. The loan may be extended for up to two years. Proceeds were used to pay-off the $15.9 million remain- ing balance of existing debt secured by Metro Pike Center, and to extinguish the related swap agreement. On February 27, 2013, the Company closed on a three-year $15.0 million mortgage loan secured by Northrock. The loan matures in 2016, bears interest at a variable rate equal to the sum of one-month LIBOR and 165 basis points, requires monthly principal and interest payments based on a 25-year amortization schedule and requires a final payment of $14.2 million at maturity. The loan may be extended for up to two years. Proceeds were used to pay-off the $15.0 million remain- ing balance of existing debt secured by Northrock. 2014 ANNUAL REPORT 23 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS On March 19, 2013, the Company closed on a 15-year, non- recourse $18.0 million mortgage loan secured by Hampshire Langley. The loan matures in 2028, bears interest at a fixed rate of 4.04%, requires monthly principal and interest payments to- taling $95,400 based on a 25-year amortization schedule and requires a final payment of $9.5 million at maturity. On April 10, 2013, the Company paid in full the $6.9 million remaining balance on the mortgage loan secured by Cruse Marketplace. On May 28, 2013, the Company closed on a 15-year, non-re- course $35.0 million mortgage loan secured by Beacon Center. The loan matures in 2028, bears interest at a fixed rate of 3.51%, requires monthly principal and interest payments total- ing $203,200 based on a 20-year amortization schedule and requires a final payment of $11.4 million at maturity. On September 4, 2013, the Company closed on a 15-year, non-recourse $18.0 million mortgage loan secured by Seabreeze Plaza. The loan matures in 2028, bears interest at a fixed rate of 3.99%, requires monthly principal and interest pay- ments totaling $94,900 based on a 25-year amortization schedule and requires a final payment of $9.5 million at matu- rity. Proceeds were used to pay off the $13.5 million remaining balance of existing debt secured by Seabreeze Plaza which was scheduled to mature in May 2014 and the Company incurred $497,000 of related debt extinguishment costs. On October 25, 2013 the Company closed on a $71.6 million construction-to-permanent loan which will partially finance the construction of Park Van Ness. The loan bears interest at 4.88% and during the construction period it will be fully recourse to Saul Centers and accrued interest will be funded by the loan. Following the completion of construction and lease- up, and upon achieving certain debt service coverage requirements, the loan will convert to a non-recourse, permanent mortgage at the same interest rate, with principal amortization computed based on a 25-year schedule. 2012 FINANCING ACTIVITY On April 11, 2012, the Company closed on a 15-year non-re- course mortgage loan in the amount of $73.0 million secured by Seven Corners shopping center. The loan matures in May 2027, bears interest at a fixed rate of 5.84%, requires equal monthly principal and interest payments totaling $463,226 based upon a 25-year amortization schedule and a final pay- ment of $42.5 million at maturity. Proceeds from the loan were used to pay-off the $63.0 million remaining balance of existing debt secured by Seven Corners and six other Shopping Center properties, which was scheduled to mature in October 2012, and to provide cash of approximately $10 million. On April 26, 2012, the Company substituted the White Oak shopping center for Van Ness Square as collateral for one of its existing mortgage loans which will allow the Company to ana- lyze the feasibility of repositioning Van Ness Square. The terms of the original loan, including its 8.11% interest rate, are un- changed and, in conjunction with the collateral substitution, the Company borrowed an additional $10.5 million, also secured by White Oak. The new borrowing requires equal monthly pay- ments based upon a fixed 4.90% interest rate and 25-year amortization schedule, and will mature in July 2024, cotermi- nously with the original loan. The consolidated loan requires equal monthly payments based upon a blended fixed interest rate of 7.0% and will require a final payment of $18.5 million at maturity. OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS The Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements that are reasonably likely to have a current or future material effect on the Company’s financial condition, revenue or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources. 24 SAUL CENTERS, INC. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS In 2014, the Company reported Funds From Operations ("FFO")1 available to common shareholders (common stockholders and limited partner unitholders) of $78.3 million, a 21.0% increase from 2013 FFO available to common shareholders of $64.7 million. The following table presents a reconciliation from net income to FFO available to common shareholders for the periods indicated: Year ended December 31, (Dollars in thousands) 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 Net income $ 57,988 $ 34,842 $ 39,780 $ 30,294 $ 43,185 Subtract: Gains on property sales (6,069) — (4,510) — (3,591) Gain on casualty settlement — (77) (219) (245) (2,475) Add: Real estate depreciation – discontinued operations — — 77 102 198 Real estate depreciation and amortization 41,203 49,130 40,112 35,298 28,379 FFO 93,122 83,895 75,240 65,449 65,696 Subtract: Preferred dividends (13,361) (13,983) (15,140) (15,140) (15,140) Preferred stock redemption (1,480) (5,228) — — — FFO available to common shareholders $ 78,281 $ 64,684 $ 60,100 $ 50,309 $ 50,556 Average shares and units used to compute FFO per share 27,977 27,330 26,614 24,740 23,793 FFO per share $ 2.80 $ 2.37 $ 2.26 $ 2.03 $ 2.12 1 The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT) developed FFO as a relative non-GAAP financial measure of performance of an equity REIT in order to recognize that income-producing real estate historically has not depreciated on the basis determined under GAAP. FFO is defined by NAREIT as net income, computed in accordance with GAAP, plus real estate depreciation and amortization, and excluding extraordinary items, impairment charges on depreciable real estate assets and gains or losses from property dispositions. FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP and is not necessarily indicative of cash available to fund cash needs, which is disclosed in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the applicable periods. There are no material legal or functional restrictions on the use of FFO. FFO should not be considered as an al- ternative to net income, its most directly comparable GAAP measure, as an indicator of the Company’s operating performance, or as an alternative to cash flows as a measure of liquidity. Management considers FFO a meaningful supplemental measure of operating performance because it primarily excludes the assumption that the value of the real estate assets diminishes predictably over time (i.e. depreciation), which is contrary to what we believe occurs with our assets, and because industry analysts have accepted it as a performance measure. FFO may not be comparable to similarly titled measures employed by other REITs. 2014 ANNUAL REPORT 25 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS ACQUISITIONS, REDEVELOPMENTS AND RENOVATIONS Management anticipates that during the coming year the Com- pany will continue activities related to the redevelopment of Van Ness Square and may develop additional freestanding out- parcels or expansions within certain of the Shopping Centers. Although not currently planned, it is possible that the Company may redevelop additional Current Portfolio Properties and may develop expansions within certain of the Shopping Centers. Ac- quisition and development of properties are undertaken only after careful analysis and review, and management’s determi- nation that such properties are expected to provide long-term earnings and cash flow growth. During the coming year, any developments, expansions or acquisitions are expected to be funded with borrowings from the Company’s credit line, con- struction financing, proceeds from the operation of the Company’s dividend reinvestment plan or other external capital resources available to the Company. The Company has been selectively involved in acquisition, devel- opment, redevelopment and renovation activities. It continues to evaluate the acquisition of land parcels for retail and office devel- opment and acquisitions of operating properties for opportunities to enhance operating income and cash flow growth. The following describes significant acquisitions, developments, redevelopments and renovations which affected the Company’s financial position and results of operations in 2014, 2013, and 2012. 1500, 1580, 1582 AND 1584 ROCKVILLE PIKE In December 2012, the Company purchased for $23.0 million, including acquisition costs, approximately 52,700 square feet of retail space located on the east side of Rockville Pike near the Twinbrook Metro station. In January 2014, the Company purchased for $8.0 million a single-tenant retail property with a 12,100 square foot CVS Pharmacy located at 1580 Rockville Pike in Rockville, Maryland, and incurred acquisition costs of $0.2 million. In April 2014, the Company purchased for $11.0 million a sin- gle-tenant retail property with a 40,700 square foot furniture store located at 1582 Rockville Pike in Rockville, Maryland, and incurred acquisition costs totaling approximately $0.2 million. Concurrently with the purchase, the Company sold to the same party, for $11.0 million, the 53,765 square foot Olney Center located in Olney, Maryland. In December 2014, the Company purchased for $6.2 million a single-tenant retail property with a 4,600 square foot restau- rant located at 1584 Rockville Pike in Rockville, Maryland, and incurred acquisition costs totaling approximately $0.2 million. The properties at 1580, 1582 and 1584 Rockville Pike are con- tiguous with and an expansion of the Company’s assets at 1500 Rockville Pike. When combined with 1500 Rockville Pike, the four properties comprise 10.3 acres which are zoned for devel- opment potential of up to 1.2 million square feet of mixed-use space. The Company is actively engaged in a plan for redevel- opment but has not committed to any timetable for commencement of construction. OLNEY Simultaneously with the sale of Olney Center, the Company en- tered into a lease of the property with the buyer and the Company continues to operate and manage the property. The lease term is 20 years and the Company has the option to pur- chase the property for $14.6 million at the end of the lease term. The purchaser has the right to sell the property to the Company at any time from and after April 2016 at a price equal to $11.0 million increased by 1.5% annually beginning January 1, 2015 and continuing each January thereafter. The Company has accounted for this transaction as a secured financing. 5541 NICHOLSON LANE In December 2012, the Company purchased for $12.2 million, including acquisition costs, approximately 20,100 square feet of retail space, located on the east side of Rockville Pike near the White Flint Metro station and adjacent to 11503 Rockville Pike, which was purchased in 2010. The property, when com- bined with 11503 Rockville Pike, will provide zoning for up to 331,000 square feet of mixed-use space. When combining these two properties with our Metro Pike Center on the west side of Rockville Pike, the Company's holdings at White Flint total 7.6 acres which are zoned for a development potential of up to 1.5 million square feet of mixed-use space. The Company is actively engaged in a plan for redevelopment but has not com- mitted to any timetable for commencement of construction. 730, 750 N. GLEBE ROAD In August 2014, the Company purchased for $40.0 million a sin- gle-tenant retail property with a 16,900 square foot automobile dealership located at 750 N. Glebe Road in Arlington, Virginia, and incurred acquisition costs of $0.4 million. In December 2014, the Company purchased for $2.8 million an adjacent sin- gle-tenant retail property with a 2,000 square foot store, and incurred acquisition costs of $40,400. The properties comprise 2.3 acres of land which is zoned for development potential of up to 450,000 square feet of mixed-use space. The Company is ac- tively engaged in a plan for redevelopment but has not committed to any timetable for commencement of construction. 26 SAUL CENTERS, INC. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS PARK VAN NESS The Company continues to develop Park Van Ness, a 271-unit residential project with approximately 9,000 square feet of street-level retail, below street-level structured parking, and amenities including a community room, landscaped courtyards, a fitness room and a rooftop pool and deck. Construction is projected to be completed in the first quarter of 2016. When complete, the structure will comprise 11 levels, five of which will be below street level. Concrete is currently being poured on the seventh level. The total cost of the project, excluding prede- velopment expense and land (which the Company has owned), is expected to be approximately $93.0 million, a portion of which will be financed with a $71.6 million construction-to-per- manent loan. Costs incurred through December 31, 2014, total approximately $27.0 million, of which $5.4 million has been financed by the loan. PROPERTY SALES WEST PARK In July 2012, the Company sold for $2.0 million the 77,000 square foot West Park shopping center in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma and recorded a $1.1 million gain. As of June 30, 2012, the carrying amounts of the associated assets and liabil- ities were $1.0 million and $207,000, respectively. There was no debt associated with the property. BELVEDERE In December 2012, the Company sold for $4.0 million, the 54,900 square foot Belvedere shopping center in Baltimore, Maryland and recorded a $3.4 million gain. As of September 30, 2012, the carrying amounts of the associated assets and liabilities were $488,000 and $22,000, respectively. There was no debt associated with the property. GIANT CENTER In April 2014, the Company sold for $7.5 million the 70,040 square foot Giant Center located in Milford Mill, Maryland and recognized a $6.1 million gain. As of March 31, 2014, the carrying amounts of the associated assets and liabilities were $0.5 million and $0.1 million, respectively. There was no debt on the property. PORTFOLIO LEASING STATUS The following chart sets forth certain information regarding commercial leases at our properties for the periods indicated. Total Properties Total Square Footage Percentage Leased As of December 31, Shopping Centers Mixed-Use Shopping Centers Mixed-Use Shopping Centers Mixed-Use 2014 50 6 7,886,304 1,453,159 95.0% 90.8% 2013 50 6 7,880,269 1,452,742 94.5% 90.5% 2012 50 7 7,877,200 1,612,200 93.4% 82.8% The 2014 Shopping Center leasing percentage includes the five properties acquired in 2014 and excludes the Giant Center, which was sold in 2014. There is no change in 2014 in the properties that comprise the Mixed-Use leasing percentage. The Clarendon Center residential component was 95.9% leased at December 31, 2014. On a same property basis, which excludes the impact of properties not in operation for the entirety of the comparable periods, the Shopping Center leasing percentage increased to 95.0% from 94.5% and the Mixed-Use leasing per- centage increased to 90.8% from 90.5%. The overall portfolio leasing percentage, on a comparative same property basis, in- creased to 94.4% at December 31, 2014 from 93.9% at December 31, 2013. The 2014 Shopping Center same center leasing percentage increased as a result of a net increase in space leased of approximately 35,500 square feet. The 2014 Mixed-Use percentage leased increased as a result of a net in- crease in space leased of approximately 4,300 square feet. There were no changes from the prior year in the properties that comprise the 2013 Shopping Centers percentage leased. The 2013 Mixed-Use percentage leased excludes Park Van Ness, which was taken out of service in March 2013 and is currently being redeveloped. The Clarendon Center residential compo- nent was 99.2% leased at December 31, 2013. On a same property basis, Shopping Center leasing percentages increased to 94.5% from 93.4% and Mixed-Use leasing percentages in- creased to 90.5% from 87.7%. The overall portfolio lease percentage, on a comparative same property basis, ended the year at 93.9%, an increase from 92.6% at year end 2012. The 2013 Shopping Centers percentage leased was impacted by a net increase of 88,600 square feet, 70,800 square feet of which resulted from improved leasing of small shop space (spaces to- taling 10,000 square feet or less) throughout the portfolio. The 2013 Mixed-Use percentage leased was impacted by a net in- crease of 34,500 square feet, the majority of which resulted from improved leasing at Avenel Business Park. 2014 ANNUAL REPORT 27 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The 2012 Shopping Centers percentage leased include 1500 Rockville Pike and 5541 Nicholson Lane, which were acquired in December 2012, and exclude West Park and Belvedere, which were sold during 2012. The 2012 Mixed-Use percentage leased includes Clarendon Center commercial area, which was 97.9% leased at December 31, 2012. The Clarendon Center residential component was 100% leased at December 31, 2012. On a same property basis, Shopping Centers percentage leased in- creased to 93.5% from 91.6% and Mixed-Use percentage leased decreased to 82.5% from 85.8%. The overall portfolio percentage leased, on a comparative same center basis, ended the year at 91.9%, an increase from 90.7% at year end 2011. The 2012 Shopping Center percentage leased was impacted by a net increase of approximately 151,000 square feet of leased space, the majority of which resulted from the leasing of space vacated by major tenants during 2011. The 2012 Mixed- Use percentage leased was adversely impacted by a net decrease of approximately 44,000 square feet of leased space, the majority of which resulted from the early termination of leases at Van Ness Square in preparation for redevelopment. The following table shows selected data for leases executed in the indicated periods. The information is based on executed leases without adjustment for the timing of occupancy, tenant defaults, or landlord concessions. The base rent for an expiring lease is the annualized contractual base rent, on a cash basis, as of the expiration date of the lease. The base rent for a new or renewed lease is the annualized contractual base rent, on a cash basis, as of the expected rent commencement date. Be- cause tenants that execute leases may not ultimately take possession of their space or pay all of their contractual rent, the changes presented in the table provide information only about trends in market rental rates. The actual changes in rental in- come received by the Company may be different. SELECTED LEASING DATA Base Rent per Square Foot Number New/Renewed Expiring Year ended December 31, Square Feet of Leases Leases Leases 2014 1,224,700 276 $ 18.60 $ 18.26 2013 1,471,000 276 19.56 19.75 2012 1,579,000 256 16.39 16.30 Additional information about commercial leasing activity during the three months ended December 31, 2014, is set forth below. The below information includes leases for space which had not been previously leased during the period of the Company's own- ership, either a result of acquisition or development. COMMERCIAL LEASING ACTIVITY New Leases Renewed Leases Number of leases 20 33 Square feet 66,568 132,014 Per square foot average annualized: During 2014, the Company entered into 234 new or renewed apartment leases. The monthly rent per square foot for these leases increased to $3.46 from $3.37. During 2013, the Com- pany entered into 228 new or renewed apartment leases. The monthly rent per square foot for these leases increased to $3.37 from $3.24. During 2012, the Company entered into 216 new or renewed apartment leases. The monthly rent per square foot for these leases increased to $3.31 from $3.11. As of December 31, 2014, 838,240 square feet of Commercial space was subject to leases scheduled to expire in 2015. Below is information about existing and estimated market base rents per square foot for that space. Base rent $ 21.41 $ 15.73 Tenant improvements (3.08) (0.11) Leasing costs (0.84) (0.06) Rent concessions (0.20) (0.03) Effective rents $ 17.29 $ 15.53 EXPIRING LEASES Total Square feet 838,240 Average base rent per square foot $ 17.29 Estimated market base rent per square foot $ 17.34 28 SAUL CENTERS, INC. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The Company is exposed to interest rate fluctuations which will affect the amount of interest expense of its variable rate debt and the fair value of its fixed rate debt. As of December 31, 2014, the Company had variable rate indebtedness totaling $72.6 million. If the interest rates on the Company’s variable rate debt instruments outstanding at December 31, 2014 had been one percent higher, our annual interest expense relating to these debt instruments would have increased by $726,310, based on those balances. As of December 31, 2014, the Com- pany had fixed-rate indebtedness totaling $784.8 million with a weighted average interest rate of 5.70%. If interest rates on the Company’s fixed-rate debt instruments at December 31, 2014 had been one percent higher, the fair value of those debt instruments on that date would have decreased by approxi- mately $43.4 million. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK The Company is exposed to certain financial market risks, the most predominant being fluctuations in interest rates. Interest rate fluctuations are monitored by management as an integral part of the Company’s overall risk management program, which recognizes the unpredictability of financial markets and seeks to reduce the potentially adverse effect on the Company’s re- sults of operations. The Company may, where appropriate, employ derivative in- struments, such as interest rate swaps, to mitigate the risk of interest rate fluctuations. The Company does not enter into de- rivatives or other financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. On June 29, 2010, the Company entered into an in- terest rate swap agreement with a $45.6 million notional amount to manage the interest rate risk associated with $45.6 million of variable-rate mortgage debt. The swap agreement was effective July 1, 2010, terminates on July 1, 2020 and ef- fectively fixes the interest rate on the mortgage debt at 5.83%. The aggregate fair value of the swap at December 31, 2014 was approximately $3.2 million and is reflected in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities in the consoli- dated balance sheet. MANAGEMENT’S REPORT on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting ASSESSMENT OF EFFECTIVENESS OF INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Man- agement used the criteria issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013 Framework) to assess the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Based upon the assessments, the Company’s management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2014, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective. The Company’s independ- ent registered public accounting firm has issued a report on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over fi- nancial reporting, which appears on page 31 in this Annual Report. 2014 ANNUAL REPORT 29 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Saul Centers, Inc. at December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein. As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method for reporting discontinued operations effective January 1, 2014. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Saul Centers, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated March 6, 2015 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon. Ernst & Young LLP McLean, Virginia March 6, 2015 The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Saul Centers, Inc. related consolidated We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Saul Centers, Inc. as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and statements of operations, the comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a)2(b). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. 30 SAUL CENTERS, INC. REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Saul Centers, Inc. We have audited Saul Centers, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). Saul Centers, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Assessment of Effectiveness of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. In our opinion, Saul Centers, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, based on the COSO criteria. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Saul Centers, Inc. as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014 of Saul Centers, Inc. and our report dated March 6, 2015 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon. Ernst & Young LLP McLean, Virginia March 6, 2015 2014 ANNUAL REPORT 31 CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS December 31, December 31, (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) 2014 2013 Assets Real estate investments Land $ 420,622 $ 354,967 Buildings and equipment 1,109,276 1,094,605 Construction in progress 30,261 9,867 1,560,159 1,459,439 Accumulated depreciation (396,617) (364,663) 1,163,542 1,094,776 Cash and cash equivalents 12,128 17,297 Accounts receivable and accrued income, net 46,784 43,884 Deferred leasing costs, net 26,928 26,052 Prepaid expenses, net 4,093 4,047 Deferred debt costs, net 9,874 9,675 Other assets 3,638 2,944 Total assets $ 1,266,987 $ 1,198,675 Liabilities Mortgage notes payable $ 808,997 $ 820,068 Revolving credit facility payable 43,000 — Construction loan payable 5,391 — Dividends and distributions payable 14,352 13,135 Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities 23,537 20,141 Deferred income 32,453 30,205 Total liabilities 927,730 883,549 Stockholders' equity Preferred stock, 1,000,000 shares authorized: Series A Cumulative Redeemable, 16,000 shares issued and outstanding in 2013 — 40,000 Series C Cumulative Redeemable, 72,000 and 56,000 shares issued and outstanding, respectively 180,000 140,000 Common stock, $0.01 par value, 30,000,000 shares authorized, 20,947,141 and 20,576,616 shares issued and outstanding, respectively 209 206 Additional paid-in capital 287,995 270,428 Accumulated deficit (173,774) (172,564) Accumulated other comprehensive loss (1,894) (1,392) Total Saul Centers, Inc. stockholders' equity 292,536 276,678 Noncontrolling interests 46,721 38,448 Total stockholders' equity 339,257 315,126 Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $ 1,266,987 $ 1,198,675 The Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements. 32 SAUL CENTERS, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS For The Year Ended December 31, (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) 2014 2013 2012 Revenue Base rent $ 164,599 $ 159,898 $ 152,777 Expense recoveries 32,132 30,949 30,391 Percentage rent 1,492 1,575 1,545 Other 8,869 5,475 5,379 Total revenue 207,092 197,897 190,092 Operating expenses Property operating expenses 26,479 24,559 23,794 Provision for credit losses 680 968 1,151 Real estate taxes 22,354 22,415 22,325 Interest expense and amortization of deferred debt costs 46,034 46,589 49,544 Depreciation and amortization of deferred leasing costs 41,203 49,130 40,112 General and administrative 16,961 14,951 14,274 Acquisition related costs 949 106 1,129 Predevelopment expenses 503 3,910 2,667 Total operating expenses 155,163 162,628 154,996 Operating income 51,929 35,269 35,096 Change in fair value of derivatives (10) (7) 36 Loss on early extinguishment of debt — (497) — Gain on sales of properties 6,069 — — Gain on casualty settlement — 77 219 Income from continuing operations 57,988 34,842 35,351 Discontinued operations Loss from operations of properties sold — — (81) Gain on sales of properties — — 4,510 Income from discontinued operations — — 4,429 Net Income 57,988 34,842 39,780 Noncontrolling interests Income from continuing operations attributable to noncontrolling interests (11,045) (3,970) (5,693) Income from discontinued operations attributable to noncontrolling interests — — (713) Income attributable to noncontrolling interests (11,045) (3,970) (6,406) Net income attributable to Saul Centers, Inc. 46,943 30,872 33,374 Preferred stock redemption (1,480) (5,228) — Preferred dividends (13,361) (13,983) (15,140) Net income available to common stockholders $ 32,102 $ 11,661 $ 18,234 Per share net income available to common stockholders Basic: Continuing operations $ 1.55 $ 0.57 $ 0.70 Discontinued operations — — 0.23 $ 1.55 $ 0.57 $ 0.93 Diluted: Continuing operations $ 1.54 $ 0.57 $ 0.70 Discontinued operations — — 0.23 $ 1.54 $ 0.57 $ 0.93 The Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements. 2014 ANNUAL REPORT 33 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME For The Year Ended December 31, (Dollars in thousands) 2014 2013 2012 Net income $ 57,988 $ 34,842 $ 39,780 Other comprehensive income Unrealized gain (loss) on cash flow hedge (675) 2,897 (932) Total comprehensive income 57,313 37,739 38,848 Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests (10,874) (4,706) (6,164) Total comprehensive income attributable to Saul Centers, Inc. 46,439 33,033 32,684 Preferred stock redemption (1,480) (5,228) — Preferred dividends (13,361) (13,983) (15,140) Total comprehensive income available to common stockholders $ 31,598 $ 13,822 $ 17,544 The Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements. 34 SAUL CENTERS, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY Accumulated Additional Other Preferred Common Paid-in Accumulated Comprehensive Total Saul Noncontrolling (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) Stock Stock Capital Deficit (Loss) Centers, Inc. Interest Total Balance, December 31, 2011 $179,328 $ 193 $ 217,829 $(144,659) $ (2,863) $ 249,828 $ 43,378 $ 293,206 Issuance of common stock: 595,388 shares pursuant to dividend reinvestment plan — 6 23,124 — — 23,130 — 23,130 158,219 shares due to exercise of employee stock options and issuance of directors’ deferred stock — 2 5,604 — — 5,606 — 5,606 Net income — — — 33,374 — 33,374 6,406 39,780 Change in unrealized loss on cash flow hedge — — — — (690) (690) (242) (932) Preferred stock distributions: Series A — — — (6,000) — (6,000) — (6,000) Series B — — — (5,355) — (5,355) — (5,355) Common stock distributions — — — (21,189) — (21,189) (7,467) (28,656) Distributions payable preferred stock: Series A, $50.00 per share — — — (2,000 ) — (2,000) — (2,000) Series B, $56.25 per share — — — (1,785) — (1,785) — (1,785) Distributions payable common stock ($0.36/share) and distributions payable partnership units ($0.36/unit) — — — (7,216) — (7,216) (2,489) (9,705) Balance, December 31, 2012 179,328 201 246,557 (154,830) (3,553) 267,703 39,586 307,289 Issuance of 56,000 shares of Series C preferred stock 140,000 — (4,807) — — 135,193 — 135,193 Partial redemption of 24,000 shares of Series A preferred stock (60,000) — 2,212 (2,216) — (60,004) — (60,004) Full redemption of 31,731 shares of Series B preferred stock (79,328) — 3,007 (3,012) — (79,333) — (79,333) Issuance of common stock: 475,162 shares pursuant to dividend reinvestment plan — 5 20,667 — — 20,672 — 20,672 56,002 shares due to exercise of employee stock options and issuance of directors' deferred stock — — 2,792 — — 2,792 — 2,792 Issuance of 88,309 partnership units pursuant to dividend reinvestment plan — — — — — — 4,144 4,144 Net income — — — 30,872 — 30,872 3,970 34,842 Change in unrealized loss on cash flow hedge — — — — 2,161 2,161 736 2,897 Preferred stock distributions: Series A — — — (3,213) — (3,213) — (3,213) Series B — — — (1,468) — (1,468) — (1,468) Series C — — — (6,095) — (6,095) — (6,095) Common stock dis tributions — — — (21,988) — (21,988) (7,467) (29,455) Distributions payable preferred stock: Series A, $50.00 per share — — — (800) — (800) — (800) Series C, $42.97 per share — — — (2,406) — (2,406) — (2,406) Distributions payable common stock ($0.36/share) and distributions payable partnership units ($0.36/unit) — — — (7,408) — (7,408) (2,521) (9,929) Balance, December 31, 2013 180,000 206 270,428 (172,564) (1,392) 276,678 38,448 315,126 Issuance of 16,000 shares of Series C preferred stock 40,000 — (740) — — 39,260 — 39,260 Redemption of 16,000 shares of Series A preferred stock (40,000) — 1,475 (1,475) — (40,000) — (40,000) Issuance of common stock: 197,638 shares pursuant to dividend reinvestment plan — 2 9,262 — — 9,264 — 9,264 172,887 shares due to exercise of employee stock options and issuance of directors' deferred stock — 1 7,570 — — 7,571 — 7,571 Issuance of 196,183 partnership units pursuant to dividend reinvestment plan — — — — — — 8,877 8,877 Net income — — — 46,943 — 46,943 11,045 57,988 Change in unrealized loss on cash flow hedge — — — — (502) (502) (173) (675) Preferred stock distributions: Series A — — — (3,049) — (3,049) — (3,049) Series C — — — (7,219) — (7,219) — (7,219) Common stock distributions — — — (24,937) — (24,937) (8,597) (33,534) Distributions payable preferred stock: Series C, $42.97 per share — — — (3,094) — (3,094) — (3,094) Distributions payable common stock ($0.40/share) and distributions payable partnership units ($0.40/unit) — — — (8,379) — (8,379) (2,879) (11,258) Balance, December 31, 2014 $180,000 $ 209 $ 287,995 $ (173,774) $ (1,894) $ 292,536 $ 46,721 $ 339,257 The Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements. 2014 ANNUAL REPORT 35 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS For the Year Ended December 31, (Dollars in thousands) 2014 2013 2012 Cash flows from operating activities: Net income $ 57,998 $ 34,842 $ 39,780 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: Change in fair value of derivatives 10 7 (36) Gain on sale of property (6,069) — (4,510) Gain on casualty settlement — (77) (219) Depreciation and amortization of deferred leasing costs 41,203 49,130 40,189 Amortization of deferred debt costs 1,327 1,257 1,576 Non cash compensation costs of stock grants and options 1,240 1,145 952 Provision for credit losses 680 968 1,151 Increase in accounts receivable and accrued income (3,320) (3,669) (3,240) Additions to deferred leasing costs (4,048) (5,876) (5,362) Increase in prepaid expenses (60) (152) (54) (Increase) decrease in other assets (694) 353 9,573 Increase (decrease) in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities 1,149 (3,286) (930) Decrease in deferred income (2,838) (1,115) (447) Net cash provided by operating activities 86,568 73,527 78,423 Cash flows from investing activities: Acquisitions of real estate investments (1) (57,494) (5,124) (34,050) Additions to real estate investments (14,986) (13,999) (12,680) Additions to development and redevelopment projects (17,788) (7,316) (7,913) Proceeds from sale of properties 6,679 — 5,818 Proceeds from casualty settlement — 405 1,952 Net cash used in investing activities (83,589) (26,034) (46,873) Cash flows from financing activities: Proceeds from mortgage notes payable (1) — 101,600 83,500 Repayments on mortgage notes payable (22,071) (71,308) (117,595) Proceeds from construction loans payable 5,391 — — Proceeds from revolving credit facility 90,000 142,000 38,000 Repayments on revolving credit facility (47,000) (180,000) (8,000) Additions to deferred debt costs (1,264) (3,219) (2,199) Proceeds from the issuance of: Common stock 15,596 22,292 27,784 Partnership units 8,877 4,144 — Series C preferred stock 39,260 135,221 — Preferred stock redemption payments: Series A preferred (40,000) (60,000) — Series B preferred — (79,328) — Preferred stock redemption costs — (9) — Distributions to: Series A preferred stockholders (3,849) (5,213) (8,000) Series B preferred stockholders — (3,253) (7,140) Series C preferred stockholders (9,625) (6,095) — Common stockholders (32,346) (29,205) (28,135) Noncontrolling interests (11,117) (9,956) (9,955) Net cash used in financing activities (8,148) (42,329) (31,740) Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents (5,169) 5,164 (190) Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year 17,297 12,133 12,323 Cash and cash equivalents, end of year $ 12,128 $ 17,297 $ 12,133 Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: Cash paid for interest $ 45,443 $ 45,743 $ 48,302 (1) The 2014 acquisition of real estate and proceeds from notes payable each exclude $11,000 in connection with the sale and leaseback of the Company's Olney property. The Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements. 36 SAUL CENTERS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 1. ORGANIZATION, FORMATION, AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION ORGANIZATION Saul Centers, Inc. (“Saul Centers”) was incorporated under the Maryland General Corporation Law on June 10, 1993. Saul Centers operates as a real estate investment trust (a “REIT”) under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). The Company is required to annually distribute at least 90% of its REIT taxable income (excluding net capital gains) to its stockholders and meet certain organizational and other re- quirements. Saul Centers has made and intends to continue to make regular quarterly distributions to its stockholders. Saul Centers, together with its wholly owned subsidiaries and the lim- ited partnerships of which Saul Centers or one of its subsidiaries is the sole general partner, are referred to collectively as the “Company.” B. Francis Saul II serves as Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of Saul Centers. FORMATION AND STRUCTURE OF COMPANY Saul Centers was formed to continue and expand the shopping center business previously owned and conducted by the B. F. Saul Real Estate Investment Trust, the B. F. Saul Company and certain other affiliated entities, each of which is controlled by B. Francis Saul II and his family members (collectively, the “Saul Organization”). On August 26, 1993, members of the Saul Or- ganization transferred to Saul Holdings Limited Partnership, a newly formed Maryland limited partnership (the “Operating Part- nership”), and two newly formed subsidiary limited partnerships (the “Subsidiary Partnerships,” and collectively with the Operat- ing Partnership, the “Partnerships”), shopping center and mixed-used properties, and the management functions related to the transferred properties. Since its formation, the Company has developed and purchased additional properties. The following table lists the significant properties acquired, developed and/or disposed of by the Company since January 1, 2012. Year of Acquisition/ Name of Property Location Type Development/ Disposal ACQUISITIONS 1500 Rockville Pike Rockville, Maryland Shopping Center December 2012 5541 Nicholson Lane Rockville, Maryland Shopping Center December 2012 1580 Rockville Pike Rockville, Maryland Shopping Center January 2014 1582 Rockville Pike Rockville, Maryland Shopping Center April 2014 750 N. Glebe Road Arlington, Virginia Shopping Center August 2014 730 N. Glebe Road Arlington, Virginia Shopping Center December 2014 1584 Rockville Pike Rockville, Maryland Shopping Center December 2014 DEVELOPMENTS Park Van Ness Washington, DC Mixed-Use 2013/2014 DISPOSITIONS West Park Oklahoma City, Oklahoma Shopping Center July 2012 Belvedere Baltimore, Maryland Shopping Center December 2012 Giant Center Milford Mill, Maryland Shopping Center April 2014 As of December 31, 2014, the Company’s properties (the “Cur- rent Portfolio Properties”) consisted of 50 shopping center properties (the “Shopping Centers”), six mixed-use properties which are comprised of office, retail and multi-family residential uses (the “Mixed-Use Properties”) and three (non-operating) development properties. 2014 ANNUAL REPORT 37 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS BASIS OF PRESENTATION The accompanying financial statements are presented on the historical cost basis of the Saul Organization because of affili- ated ownership and common management and because the assets and liabilities were the subject of a business combination with the Operating Partnership, the Subsidiary Partnerships and Saul Centers, all newly formed entities with no prior operations. 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES NATURE OF OPERATIONS The Company, which conducts all of its activities through its sub- sidiaries, the Operating Partnership and Subsidiary Partnerships, engages in the ownership, operation, management, leasing, ac- quisition, renovation, expansion, development and financing of community and neighborhood shopping centers and mixed- used properties, primarily in the Washington, DC/ Baltimore metropolitan area. Because the properties are located primarily in the Washington, DC/Baltimore metropolitan area, a dispro- portionate economic downturn in the local economy would have a greater negative impact on our overall financial per- formance than on the overall financial performance of a company with a portfolio that is more geographically diverse. A majority of the Shopping Centers are anchored by several major tenants. As of December 31, 2014, 32 of the Shopping Centers were anchored by a grocery store and offer primarily day-to-day necessities and services. Two retail tenants, Giant Food (4.5%), a tenant at nine Shopping Centers, and Safeway (2.5%), a tenant at eight Shopping Centers, individually ac- counted for 2.5% or more of the Company’s total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2014. PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Saul Centers, its subsidiaries, and the Operating Partnership and Subsidiary Partnerships which are majority owned by Saul Centers. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. USE OF ESTIMATES The preparation of financial statements in conformity with ac- counting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make certain estimates and assump- tions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT PROPERTIES The Company purchases real estate investment properties from time to time and records assets acquired and liabilities assumed, including land, buildings, and intangibles related to in-place leases and customer relationships, based on their fair values. The fair value of buildings generally is determined as if the buildings were vacant upon acquisition and then subsequently leased at market rental rates and considers the present value of all cash flows expected to be generated by the property including an initial lease up period. From time to time the Company may purchase a property for future development purposes. The property may be improved with an existing structure that would be demolished as part of the development. In such cases, the fair value of the building may be determined based only on existing leases and not include estimated cash flows related to future leases. In certain circumstances, such as if the building is vacant and the Company intends to demolish the building in the near term, the entire pur- chase price will be allocated to land. The Company determines the fair value of above and below market intangibles associated with in-place leases by assessing the net effective rent and remaining term of the lease relative to market terms for similar leases at acquisition taking into con- sideration the remaining contractual lease period, renewal periods, and the likelihood of the tenant exercising its renewal options. The fair value of a below market lease component is recorded as deferred income and accreted as additional lease revenue over the remaining contractual lease period. If the fair value of the below market lease intangible includes fair value associated with a renewal option, such amounts are not ac- creted until the renewal option is exercised. If the renewal option is not exercised the value is recognized at that time. The fair value of above market lease intangibles is recorded as a deferred asset and is amortized as a reduction of lease revenue over the remaining contractual lease term. The Company de- termines the fair value of at-market in-place leases considering the cost of acquiring similar leases, the foregone rents associ- ated with the lease-up period and carrying costs associated with the lease-up period. Intangible assets associated with at- market in-place leases are amortized as additional expense over the remaining contractual lease term. To the extent customer rela- tionship intangibles are present in an acquisition, the fair values of the intangibles are amortized over the lives of the customer relationships. The Company has never recorded a customer re- lationship intangible asset. Acquisition-related transaction costs are either (a) expensed as incurred when related to business combinations or (b) capitalized to land and/or building when related to asset acquisitions. 38 SAUL CENTERS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS If there is an event or change in circumstance that indicates a potential impairment in the value of a real estate investment property, the Company prepares an analysis to determine whether the carrying value of the real estate investment property exceeds its estimated fair value. The Company considers both quantitative and qualitative factors including recurring operating losses, significant decreases in occupancy, and significant ad- verse changes in legal factors and business climate. If impairment indicators are present, the Company compares the projected cash flows of the property over its remaining useful life, on an undiscounted basis, to the carrying value of that property. The Company assesses its undiscounted projected cash flows based upon estimated capitalization rates, historic operating results and market conditions that may affect the property. If the carrying value is greater than the undiscounted projected cash flows, the Company would recognize an impair- ment loss equivalent to an amount required to adjust the carrying amount to its then estimated fair value. The fair value of any property is sensitive to the actual results of any of the aforementioned estimated factors, either individually or taken as a whole. Should the actual results differ from management’s projections, the valuation could be negatively or positively af- fected. The Company did not recognize an impairment loss on any of its real estate in 2014, 2013, or 2012. Interest, real estate taxes, development related salary costs and other carrying costs are capitalized on projects under develop- ment and construction. Once construction is substantially completed and the assets are placed in service, their rental in- come, real estate tax expense, property operating expenses (consisting of payroll, repairs and maintenance, utilities, insur- ance and other property related expenses) and depreciation are included in current operations. Property operating expenses are charged to operations as incurred. Interest expense capitalized totaled $688,900, $170,000, and $42,300 during 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively. Commercial development proj- ects are considered substantially complete and available for occupancy upon completion of tenant improvements, but no later than one year from the cessation of major construction ac- tivity. Multi- family residential development projects are considered substantially complete and available for occupancy upon receipt of the certificate of occupancy from the appropri- ate licensing authority. Substantially completed portions of a project are accounted for as separate projects. Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method and es- timated useful lives of generally between 35 and 50 years for base buildings, or a shorter period if management determines that the building has a shorter useful life, and up to 20 years for certain other improvements that extend the useful lives. Leasehold improvements expenditures are capitalized when certain criteria are met, including when the Company supervises construction and will own the improvements. Tenant improvements are amor- tized, over the shorter of the lives of the related leases or the useful life of the improvement, using the straight-line method. Depreci- ation expense and amortization of leasehold improvements, which is included in Depreciation and amortization of deferred leasing costs in the Consolidated Statements of Operations, for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012, was $35.9 million, $43.2 million, and $34.6 million, respectively. Re- pairs and maintenance expense totaled $11.9 million, $10.3 million, and $9.9 million for 2014, 2013, and 2012, respec- tively, and is included in property operating expenses in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. DEFERRED LEASING COSTS Deferred leasing costs consist of commissions paid to third-party leasing agents, internal direct costs such as employee compen- sation and payroll-related fringe benefits directly related to time spent performing leasing-related activities for successful com- mercial leases and amounts attributed to in place leases associated with acquired properties and are amortized, using the straight-line method, over the term of the lease or the re- maining term of an acquired lease. Leasing related activities include evaluating the prospective tenant’s financial condition, evaluating and recording guarantees, collateral and other se- curity arrangements, negotiating lease terms, preparing lease documents and closing the transaction. Unamortized deferred costs are charged to expense if the applicable lease is termi- nated prior to expiration of the initial lease term. Collectively, deferred leasing costs totaled $26.9 million and $26.1 million, net of accumulated amortization of approximately $21.6 million and $16.6 million, as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, re- in spectively. Amortization expense, which Depreciation and amortization of deferred leasing costs in the Consolidated Statements of Operations, totaled approximately $5.3 million, $5.9 million, and $5.5 million, for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively. included is CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS Construction in progress includes preconstruction and develop- ment costs of active projects. Preconstruction costs include legal, zoning and permitting costs and other project carrying costs in- curred prior to the commencement of construction. Development costs include direct construction costs and indirect costs incurred subsequent to the start of construction such as architectural, en- gineering, construction management and carrying costs consisting of interest, real estate taxes and insurance. The fol- lowing table shows the components of construction in progress. December 31, (In thousands) 2014 2013 Park Van Ness $ 26,998 $ 7,901 Other 3,263 1,966 Total $ 30,261 $ 9,867 2014 ANNUAL REPORT 39 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DEFERRED INCOME Deferred income consists of payments received from tenants prior to the time they are earned and recognized by the Com- pany as revenue, including tenant prepayment of rent for future periods, real estate taxes when the taxing jurisdiction has a fiscal year differing from the calendar year reimbursements specified in the lease agreement and tenant construction work provided by the Company. In addition, deferred income includes the fair value of certain below market leases. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS The Company may, when appropriate, employ derivative instru- ments, such as interest-rate swaps, to mitigate the risk of interest rate fluctuations. The Company does not enter into derivative or other financial instruments for trading or speculative pur- poses. Derivative financial instruments are carried at fair value as either assets or liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. For those derivative instruments that qualify, the Company may designate the hedging instrument, based upon the exposure being hedged, as a fair value hedge or a cash flow hedge. De- rivative instruments that are designated as a hedge are evaluated to ensure they continue to qualify for hedge account- ing. The effective portion of any gain or loss on the hedge instruments is reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and recognized in earnings within the same line item associated with the forecasted transaction in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Any ineffective portion of the change in fair value of a derivative instrument is immediately recognized in earnings. For derivative instruments that do not meet the criteria for hedge accounting, or that qualify and are not designated, changes in fair value are immediately recognized in earnings. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS During 2012, the Company sold its West Park and Belvedere properties for $2.0 million and $4.0 million and recognized gains of $1.1 million and $3.4 million, respectively. The results of operations of West Park and Belvedere for the year ended December 31, 2012 are included in the statements of opera- tions as “Loss from operations of properties sold.” The 2014 sale of Giant Center is accounted for under the new discontin- ued operations guidance discussed below in Recently Issued Accounting Standards and, therefore, is not presented as dis- continued operations. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE AND ACCRUED INCOME Accounts receivable primarily represent amounts currently due from tenants in accordance with the terms of the respective leases. Receivables are reviewed monthly and reserves are es- tablished with a charge to current period operations when, in the opinion of management, collection of the receivable is doubtful. Accounts receivable in the accompanying consoli- dated financial statements are shown net of an allowance for doubtful accounts of $0.7 million and $0.6 million, at Decem- ber 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Year ended December 31, (In thousands) 2014 2013 2012 Beginning Balance $ 572 $1,208 $ 671 Provision for Credit Losses 680 968 1,160 Charge-offs (575) (1,604) (623) Ending Balance $ 677 $ 572 $1,208 In addition to rents due currently, accounts receivable also in- cludes $38.7 million and $37.2 million, at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, net of allowance for doubtful accounts totaling $0.3 million and $0.5 million, respectively, representing minimum rental income accrued on a straight-line basis to be paid by tenants over the remaining term of their respective leases. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS Cash and cash equivalents include short-term investments. Short-term investments include money market accounts and other investments which generally mature within three months, measured from the acquisition date, and/or are readily convert- ible to cash. Substantially all of the Company’s cash balances at December 31, 2014 are held in non-interest bearing ac- counts at various banks. From time to time the Company may maintain deposits with financial institutions in amounts in excess of federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses on such deposits and believes it is not exposed to any significant credit risk on those deposits. DEFERRED DEBT COSTS Deferred debt costs consist of fees and costs incurred to obtain long-term financing, construction financing and the revolving line of credit. These fees and costs are being amortized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the respective loans or agreements, which approximates the effective interest method. Deferred debt costs totaled $9.9 million and $9.7 million, net of accumulated amortization of $5.9 million and $4.5 million at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. 40 SAUL CENTERS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS REVENUE RECOGNITION Rental and interest income are accrued as earned except when doubt exists as to collectability, in which case the accrual is dis- continued. Recognition of rental income commences when control of the space has been given to the tenant. When rental payments due under leases vary from a straight-line basis be- cause of free rent periods or stepped increases, income is recognized on a straight-line basis. Expense recoveries repre- sent a portion of property operating expenses billed to the tenants, including common area maintenance, real estate taxes and other recoverable costs. Expense recoveries are recognized in the period in which the expenses are incurred. Rental income based on a tenant’s revenue (“percentage rent”) is accrued when a tenant reports sales that exceed a specified breakpoint, pursuant to the terms of their respective leases. INCOME TAXES The Company made an election to be treated, and intends to continue operating so as to qualify, as a REIT under the Code, commencing with its taxable year ended December 31, 1993. A REIT generally will not be subject to federal income taxation, pro- vided that distributions to its stockholders equal or exceed its REIT taxable income and complies with certain other requirements. Therefore, no provision has been made for federal income taxes in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. As of December 31, 2014, the Company had no material un- recognized tax benefits and there exist no potentially significant unrecognized tax benefits which are reasonably expected to occur within the next twelve months. The Company recognizes penalties and interest accrued related to unrecognized tax ben- efits, if any, as general and administrative expense. No penalties and interest have been accrued in years 2014, 2013, and 2012. The tax basis of the Company’s real estate investments was approximately $1.2 billion and $1.1 billion as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state, and local tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2008. STOCK BASED EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION, DEFERRED COMPENSATION AND STOCK PLAN FOR DIRECTORS The Company uses the fair value method to value and account for employee stock options. The fair value of options granted is determined at the time of each award using the Black-Scholes model, a widely used method for valuing stock based employee compensation, and the following assumptions: (1) Expected Volatility determined using the most recent trading history of the Company’s common stock (month-end clos- ing prices) corresponding to the average expected term of the options; (2) Average Expected Term of the options is based on prior ex- ercise history, scheduled vesting and the expiration date; (3) Expected Dividend Yield determined by management after considering the Company’s current and historic dividend yield rates, the Company’s yield in relation to other retail REITs and the Company’s market yield at the grant date; and (4) a Risk- free Interest Rate based upon the market yields of US Treasury obligations with maturities corresponding to the average expected term of the options at the grant date. The Company amortizes the value of options granted ratably over the vesting period and includes the amounts as compensa- tion in general and administrative expenses. The Company has a stock plan, which was originally approved in 2004, amended in 2008 and 2013 and which expires in 2023, for the purpose of attracting and retaining executive of- ficers, directors and other key personnel (the "Stock Plan"). Pursuant to the Stock Plan, the Compensation Committee es- tablished a Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors for the benefit of its directors and their beneficiaries, which replaced a previous Deferred Compensation and Stock Plan for Directors. A director may make an annual election to defer all or part of his or her director’s fees and has the option to have the fees paid in cash, in shares of common stock or in a combination of cash and shares of common stock upon separation from the Board. If the director elects to have fees paid in stock, fees earned during a calendar quarter are aggregated and divided by the common stock’s closing market price on the first trading day of the following quarter to determine the number of shares to be allocated to the director. As of December 31, 2014, the directors’ deferred fee accounts comprise 232,262 shares. The Compensation Committee has also approved an annual award of shares of the Company’s common stock as additional compensation to each director serving on the Board of Directors as of the record date for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The shares are awarded as of each Annual Meeting of Share- holders, and their issuance may not be deferred. Each director was issued 200 shares for each of the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012. The shares were valued at the closing stock price on the dates the shares were awarded and included in general and administrative expenses in the total amounts of $112,900, $124,400, and $110,000, for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively. NONCONTROLLING INTEREST Saul Centers is the sole general partner of the Operating Part- nership, owning a 74.2% common interest as of December 31, 2014. Noncontrolling interest in the Operating Partnership is comprised of limited partnership units owned by the Saul Organ- ization. Noncontrolling interest reflected on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets is increased for earnings allocated to limited partnership interests and distributions reinvested in ad- ditional units, and is decreased for limited partner distributions. Noncontrolling interest reflected on the consolidated statements of operations represents earnings allocated to limited partnership interests held by the Saul Organization. 2014 ANNUAL REPORT 41 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PER SHARE DATA Per share data for net income (basic and diluted) is computed using weighted average shares of common stock. Convertible limited partnership units and employee stock options are the Company’s potentially dilutive securities. For all periods pre- sented, the convertible limited partnership units are anti-dilutive. For the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012, options totaling 106,875, 112,500, and 117,500, respectively, are not dilutive because the average share price of the Company’s common stock was less than the exercise prices. The treasury stock method was used to measure the effect of the dilution. BASIC AND DILUTED SHARES OUTSTANDING December 31, (Shares in thousands) 2014 2013 2012 Weighted average common shares outstanding - Basic 20,772 20,364 19,649 Effect of dilutive options 49 37 51 Weighted average common shares outstanding - Diluted 20,821 20,401 19,700 Average share price $ 49.09 $ 45.44 $ 40.94 LEGAL CONTINGENCIES The Company is subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business, which are generally covered by insurance. Upon determination that a loss is prob- able to occur and can be reasonably estimated, the estimated amount of the loss is recorded in the financial statements. RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS In April 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-08, “Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property Plant and Equipment (Topic 360)” (“ASU 2014-08”). ASU 2014-08 changes the requirements for reporting discon- tinued operations such that disposals of components of an entity will be reported in discontinued operations if the disposal rep- resents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s operations. ASU 2014-08 also requires additional disclosures about discontinued operations. ASU 2014-08 is ef- fective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods within those years and early adoption is per- mitted. The Company retrospectively adopted ASU 2014-08 on April 15, 2014. The adoption of ASU 2014-08 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations. In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (“ASU 2014-09”). ASU 2014-09 will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance and will re- quire an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or serv- ices to customers. ASU 2014-09 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those years and early adoption is not permitted. ASU 2014-09 must be applied retrospectively by either restating prior periods or by recognizing the cumulative effect as of the first date of ap- plication. We have not yet selected a transition method and are evaluating the impact that ASU 2014-09 will have on our con- solidated financial statements and related disclosures. RECLASSIFICATIONS Certain reclassifications have been made to prior years to conform to the presentation used for year ended December 31, 2014. 3. REAL ESTATE ACQUIRED 1500, 1580, 1582 AND 1584 ROCKVILLE PIKE In December 2012, the Company purchased for $22.4 million 1500 Rockville Pike, and incurred acquisition costs of $0.6 mil- lion. In January 2014, the Company purchased for $8.0 million 1580 Rockville Pike and incurred acquisition costs of $0.2 mil- lion. In April 2014, the Company purchased for $11.0 million 1582 Rockville Pike and incurred acquisition costs of $0.2 mil- lion. In December 2014, the company purchased for $6.2 million 1584 Rockville Pike and incurred acquisition costs of $0.2 million. These retail properties are contiguous with each other and are located in Rockville, Maryland. 730 AND 750 GLEBE ROAD In August 2014, the Company purchased for $40.0 million, 750 N. Glebe Road and incurred acquisition costs of $0.4 mil- lion. In December 2014, the Company purchased for $2.8 million 730 N. Glebe Road, and incurred acquisition costs of $40,400. These retail properties are contiguous and are lo- cated in Arlington, Virginia. 5541 NICHOLSON LANE In December 2012, the Company purchased for $11.7 million 5541 Nicholson Lane, a retail property located in Rockville, Maryland, and incurred acquisition costs of $0.5 million. KENTLANDS PAD In August 2013, the Company purchased for $4.3 million, a retail pad with a 7,100 square foot restaurant located in Gaithersburg, Maryland, which is contiguous with and an ex- pansion of the Company's other Kentlands assets, and incurred acquisition costs of $106,000. 42 SAUL CENTERS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS HUNT CLUB PAD In December 2013, the Company purchased for $0.8 million, including acquisition costs, a retail pad with a 5,500 square foot vacant building located in Apopka, Florida, which is con- tiguous with and an expansion of the Company's other Hunt Club asset. ALLOCATION OF PURCHASE PRICE OF REAL ESTATE ACQUIRED The Company allocates the purchase price of real estate invest- ment properties to various components, such as land, buildings and intangibles related to in-place leases and customer relation- ships, based on their fair values. See Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies-Real Estate Investment Properties. During 2014, the Company purchased five properties at an ag- gregate cost of $68.0 million, and incurred acquisition costs of $0.9 million. The purchase prices were allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair value as shown in the following table. PURCHASE PRICE ALLOCATION OF ACQUISITIONS (In thousands) Land Buildings In-place Leases Above-Market Rent Below-Market Rent 1580 Rockville Pike 1582 Rockville Pike 750 N. Glebe Road 730 N. Glebe Road 1584 Rockville Pike Total $ 9,600 $ 9,742 $ 38,224 $ 2,683 $ 5,798 $ 66,047 2,200 828 1,327 78 440 4,873 513 849 449 39 249 2,099 — — — — — — (4,313) (419) — — (337) (5,069) Total Purchase Price $ 8,000 $ 11,000 $ 40,000 $ 2,800 $ 6,150 $ 67,950 During 2013, the Company purchased two properties at a cost of $5.1 million and incurred acquisition costs of $106,000. Of the total purchase price, $2.0 million was allocated to buildings and $3.1 million was allocated to land. No amounts were al- located to in-place, above-market, or below-market leases. During 2012, the Company purchased two properties at an ag- gregate cost of $34.1 million and incurred acquisition costs of $1.1 million. Of the total purchase price, $3.8 million was al- located to buildings, $30.4 million was allocated to land, and $0.5 million was allocated to in-place leases and $0.7 million was allocated to below-market leases which is included in de- ferred income and is being accreted to income over the lives of the underlying leases, which is approximately 3.1 years. The gross carrying amount of lease intangible assets included in deferred leasing costs as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 was $24.0 million and $21.9 million, respectively, and accumulated amortization was $18.0 million and $16.7 million, respectively. Amortization expense totaled $1.3 million, $2.0 million and $2.0 million, for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively. The gross carrying amount of below market lease intangible liabilities included in deferred income as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 was $29.9 million and $24.8 million, respectively, and accumulated amortization was $11.9 million and $10.0 million, respectively. Accretion income totaled $1.9 million, $1.7 million, and $1.6 million, for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively. The gross carrying amount of above market lease intangible assets included in accounts receivable as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 was $1.0 million and $1.0 mil- lion, respectively, and accumulated amortization was $996,700 and $974,100, respectively. Amortization expense totaled $23,000, $45,000 and $60,000, for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. 2014 ANNUAL REPORT 43 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS As of December 31, 2014, scheduled amortization of intangible assets and deferred income related to in-place leases is as follows: AMORTIZATION OF INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND DEFERRED INCOME RELATED TO IN-PLACE LEASES Lease Above- Below- acquisition market market (In thousands) costs leases leases 2015 $ 1,252 $ 2 $ 1,787 2016 988 1 1,722 2017 796 1 1,701 2018 737 1 1,617 2019 550 — 1,473 Thereafter 1,739 — 9,670 Total $ 6,062 $ 5 $ 17,970 4. NONCONTROLLING INTEREST - HOLDERS OF CONVERTIBLE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP UNITS IN THE OPERATING PARTNERSHIP The Saul Organization holds a 25.8% limited partnership inter- est in the Operating Partnership represented by 7,198,721 limited partnership units, as of December 31, 2014. The units are convertible into shares of Saul Centers’ common stock, at the option of the unit holder, on a one-for-one basis provided that, in accordance with the Saul Centers, Inc. Articles of Incor- poration, the rights may not be exercised at any time that the Saul Organization beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, in the aggregate more than 39.9% of the value of the outstanding common stock and preferred stock of Saul Centers (the “Equity Securities”). As of December 31, 2014, 814,000 units were eligible for conversion. The impact of the Saul Organization’s 25.8% limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership is reflected as Noncontrol- ling Interest in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. Fully converted partnership units and diluted weighted average shares outstanding for the years ended De- cember 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012, were 27,977,500, 27,330,100, and 26,613,900, respectively. 5. MORTGAGE NOTES PAYABLE, REVOLVING CREDIT FACILITY, INTEREST EXPENSE AND AMORTIZATION OF DEFERRED DEBT COSTS At December 31, 2014, outstanding debt totaled $857.4 mil- lion, of which $784.8 million was fixed rate debt and $72.6 million was variable rate debt. The Company’s outstanding debt totaled $820.1 million at December 31, 2013, of which $789.9 million was fixed rate debt and $30.2 million was vari- able rate debt. At December 31, 2014, the Company had a $275.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility, which can be used for working capital, property acquisitions or development projects. The revolving credit facility matures on June 23, 2018, and may be extended by the Company for one additional year subject to the Company’s satisfaction of certain conditions. Saul Centers and certain consolidated subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership have guaranteed the payment obligations of the Operating Partnership under the revolving credit facility. Letters of credit may be issued under the revolving credit facility. On December 31, 2014, based on the value of the Company's un- encumbered properties, approximately $231.6 million was available under the line, $43.0 million was outstanding and ap- proximately $448,000 was committed for letters of credit. The interest rate under the facility is variable and equals the sum of one-month LIBOR and a margin that is based on the Com- pany’s leverage ratio and which can range from 145 basis points to 200 basis points. As of December 31, 2014, the mar- gin was 145 basis points. Saul Centers is a guarantor of the revolving credit facility, of which the Operating Partnership is the borrower. Saul Centers guarantees a portion of the Northrock bank term loan (approx- imately $7.5 million of the $14.5 million outstanding at December 31, 2014) and the Metro Pike Center bank loan (ap- proximately $7.8 million of the $15.1 million outstanding at December 31, 2014) and all of the Park Van Ness construction- to-permanent loan. All other notes payable are non-recourse. On April 11, 2012, the Company closed on a 15-year non-re- course mortgage loan in the amount of $73.0 million secured by Seven Corners shopping center. The loan matures in 2027, bears interest at a fixed rate of 5.84%, requires equal monthly principal and interest payments totaling $463,200 based upon a 25-year amortization schedule and a final payment of $42.3 million at maturity. Proceeds from the loan were used to pay-off the $63 million remaining balance of existing debt secured by Seven Corners and six other shopping center properties, and to provide cash of approximately $10 million. 44 SAUL CENTERS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS On April 26, 2012, the Company substituted the White Oak shopping center for Van Ness Square as collateral for one of its existing mortgage loans. The terms of the original loan, includ- ing its 8.11% interest rate, are unchanged and, in conjunction with the collateral substitution, the Company borrowed an ad- ditional $10.5 million, also secured by White Oak. The new borrowing requires equal monthly payments based upon a fixed 4.90% interest rate and 25-year amortization schedule, and will mature in 2024, coterminously with the original loan. The con- solidated loan requires equal monthly payments based upon a blended fixed interest rate of 7.0% and will require a final pay- ment of $18.5 million at maturity. On February 27, 2013, the Company closed on a three-year $15.6 million mortgage loan secured by Metro Pike Center. The loan matures in 2016, bears interest at a variable rate equal to the sum of one-month LIBOR and 165 basis points, requires monthly principal and interest payments based on a 25-year amortization schedule and requires a final payment of $14.8 million at maturity. The loan may be extended for up to two years. Proceeds were used to pay-off the $15.9 million remain- ing balance of existing debt secured by Metro Pike Center, and to extinguish the related swap agreement. On February 27, 2013, the Company closed on a three-year $15.0 million mortgage loan secured by Northrock. The loan matures in 2016, bears interest at a variable rate equal to the sum of one-month LIBOR and 165 basis points, requires monthly principal and interest payments based on a 25-year amortization schedule and requires a final payment of $14.2 million at maturity. The loan may be extended for up to two years. Proceeds were used to pay-off the $15.0 million remain- ing balance of existing debt secured by Northrock. On March 19, 2013, the Company closed on a 15-year, non- recourse $18.0 million mortgage loan secured by Hampshire Langley. The loan matures in 2028, bears interest at a fixed rate of 4.04%, requires monthly principal and interest payments to- taling $95,400 based on a 25-year amortization schedule and requires a final payment of $9.5 million at maturity. On April 10, 2013, the Company paid in full the $6.9 million remaining balance on the mortgage loan secured by Cruse Marketplace. On May 28, 2013, the Company closed on a 15-year, non-re- course $35.0 million mortgage loan secured by Beacon Center. The loan matures in 2028, bears interest at a fixed rate of 3.51%, requires monthly principal and interest payments total- ing $203,200 based on a 20-year amortization schedule and requires a final payment of $11.4 million at maturity. On September 4, 2013, the Company closed on a 15-year, non-recourse $18.0 million mortgage loan secured by Seabreeze Plaza. The loan matures in 2028, bears interest at a fixed rate of 3.99%, requires monthly principal and interest pay- ments totaling $94,900 based on a 25-year amortization schedule and requires a final payment of $9.5 million at matu- rity. Proceeds were used to pay off the $13.5 million remaining balance of existing debt secured by Seabreeze Plaza which was scheduled to mature in May 2014 and the Company incurred $497,000 of related debt extinguishment costs. On October 25, 2013 the Company closed on a $71.6 million construction-to-permanent loan which will partially finance the construction of Park Van Ness. The loan bears interest at 4.88% and during the construction period it will be fully recourse to Saul Centers and accrued interest will be funded by the loan. Following the completion of construction and lease- up, and upon achieving certain debt service coverage requirements, the loan will convert to a non-recourse, permanent mortgage at the same interest rate, with principal amortization computed based on a 25-year schedule. On June 24, 2014, the Company amended and restated its re- volving credit facility. The Company unsecured revolving credit facility, which can be used for working capital, property acqui- sitions, development projects or letters of credit was increased to $275.0 million. The revolving credit facility matures on June 23, 2018, and may be extended by the Company for one ad- ditional year subject to the Company’s satisfaction of certain conditions. Saul Centers and certain consolidated subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership have guaranteed the payment ob- ligations of the Operating Partnership under the revolving credit facility. Letters of credit may be issued under the revolving credit facility. The interest rate under the facility is variable and equals the sum of one-month LIBOR and a margin that is based on the Company’s leverage ratio, and which can range from 145 basis points to 200 basis points. 2014 ANNUAL REPORT 45 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The following is a summary of notes payable as of December 31, 2014 and 2013: NOTES PAYABLE Year Ended December 31, Interest Scheduled (Dollars in thousands) 2014 2013 Rate* Maturity* Fixed rate mortgages: $ 15,399 (a) $ 16,128 7.45% Jun-2015 32,049 (b) 33,246 6.01% Feb-2018 35,398 (c) 36,937 5.88% Jan-2019 11,454 (d) 11,949 5.76% May-2019 15,819 (e) 16,501 5.62% Jul-2019 15,761 (f) 16,419 5.79% Sep-2019 14,014 (g) 14,610 5.22% Jan-2020 10,881 (h) 11,159 5.60% May-2020 9,535 (i) 9,921 5.30% Jun-2020 41,441 (j) 42,462 5.83% Jul-2020 8,346 (k) 8,649 5.81% Feb-2021 6,100 (l) 6,233 6.01% Aug-2021 35,222 (m) 35,981 5.62% Jun-2022 10,718 (n) 10,930 6.08% Sep-2022 11,587 (o) 11,795 6.43% Apr-2023 14,909 (p) 15,598 6.28% Feb-2024 16,750 (q) 17,123 7.35% Jun-2024 14,535 (r) 14,849 7.60% Jun-2024 25,639 (s) 26,153 7.02% Jul-2024 30,429 (t) 31,093 7.45% Jul-2024 30,253 (u) 30,894 7.30% Jan-2025 15,735 (v) 16,087 6.18% Jan-2026 115,291 (w) 118,128 5.31% Apr-2026 35,125 (x) 36,075 4.30% Oct-2026 39,932 (y) 40,974 4.53% Nov-2026 18,645 (z) 19,118 4.70% Dec-2026 69,397 (aa) 70,856 5.84% May-2027 17,281 (bb) 17,718 4.04% Apr-2028 33,140 (cc) 34,391 3.51% Jun-2028 17,462 (dd) 17,895 3.99% Sep-2028 5,391 (ee) — 4.88% Sep-2032 11,119 (ff) — 8.00% Apr-2034 Total fixed rate 784,757 789,872 5.70% 9.3 Years Variable rate loans: 43,000 (gg) — LIBOR + 1.45% Jun-2018 14,525 (hh) 14,802 LIBOR + 1.65% Feb-2016 15,106 (ii) 15,394 LIBOR + 1.65% Feb-2016 Total variable rate 72,631 30,196 LIBOR + 1.53% 2.5 Years Total notes payable $ 857,388 $ 820,068 5.36% 8.7 Years * Interest rate and scheduled maturity data presented as of December 31, 2014. Totals computed using weighted averages. 46 SAUL CENTERS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (a) The loan is collateralized by Shops at Fairfax and Boulevard shopping cen- ters and requires equal monthly principal and interest payments totaling $156,000 based upon a weighted average 23-year amortization schedule and a final payment of $15.2 million is due at loan maturity. Principal of $729,000 was amortized during 2014. (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (b) The loan is collateralized by Washington Square and requires equal monthly principal and interest payments of $264,000 based upon a 27.5- year amortization schedule and a final payment of $28.0 million at loan maturity. Principal of $1.2 million was amortized during 2014. The loan is collateralized by three shopping centers, Broadlands Village, The Glen and Kentlands Square I, and requires equal monthly principal and interest payments of $306,000 based upon a 25-year amortization schedule and a final payment of $28.4 million at loan maturity. Principal of $1.5 million was amortized during 2014. The loan is collateralized by Olde Forte Village and requires equal monthly principal and interest payments of $98,000 based upon a 25-year amor- tization schedule and a final payment of $9.0 million at loan maturity. Principal of $495,000 was amortized during 2014. The loan is collateralized by Countryside and requires equal monthly prin- cipal and interest payments of $133,000 based upon a 25-year amortization schedule and a final payment of $12.3 million at loan ma- turity. Principal of $682,000 was amortized during 2014. The loan is collateralized by Briggs Chaney MarketPlace and requires equal monthly principal and interest payments of $133,000 based upon a 25-year amortization schedule and a final payment of $12.2 million at loan maturity. Principal of $658,000 was amortized during 2014. The loan is collateralized by Shops at Monocacy and requires equal monthly principal and interest payments of $112,000 based upon a 25- year amortization schedule and a final payment of $10.6 million at loan maturity. Principal of $596,000 was amortized during 2014. The loan is collateralized by Boca Valley Plaza and requires equal monthly principal and interest payments of $75,000 based upon a 30-year amor- tization schedule and a final payment of $9.1 million at loan maturity. Principal of $278,000 was amortized during 2014. The loan is collateralized by Palm Springs Center and requires equal monthly principal and interest payments of $75,000 based upon a 25- year amortization schedule and a final payment of $7.1 million at loan maturity. Principal of $386,000 was amortized during 2014. The loan and a corresponding interest-rate swap closed on June 29, 2010 and are collateralized by Thruway. On a combined basis, the loan and the interest-rate swap require equal monthly principal and interest pay- ments of $289,000 based upon a 25-year amortization schedule and a final payment of $34.8 million at loan maturity. Principal of $1,021,000 was amortized during 2014. The loan is collateralized by Jamestown Place and requires equal monthly principal and interest payments of $66,000 based upon a 25-year amor- tization schedule and a final payment of $6.1 million at loan maturity. Principal of $303,000 was amortized during 2014. The loan is collateralized by Hunt Club Corners and requires equal monthly principal and interest payments of $42,000 based upon a 30- year amortization schedule and a final payment of $5.0 million, at loan maturity. Principal of $133,000 was amortized during 2014. (k) (l) (i) (j) (n) (m) The loan is collateralized by Lansdowne Town Center and requires monthly principal and interest payments of $230,000 based on a 30-year amor- tization schedule and a final payment of $28.2 million at loan maturity. Principal of $759,000 was amortized during 2014. The loan is collateralized by Orchard Park and requires equal monthly principal and interest payments of $73,000 based upon a 30-year amor- tization schedule and a final payment of $8.6 million at loan maturity. Principal of $212,000 was amortized during 2014. The loan is collateralized by BJ’s Wholesale and requires equal monthly principal and interest payments of $80,000 based upon a 30-year amor- tization schedule and a final payment of $9.3 million at loan maturity. Principal of $208,000 was amortized during 2014. (o) (p) (q) (r) (s) (t) (u) (v) (w) (x) (y) (z) The loan is collateralized by Great Falls shopping center. The loan consists of three notes which require equal monthly principal and interest payments of $138,000 based upon a weighted average 26-year amortization schedule and a final payment of $6.3 million at maturity. Principal of $689,000 was amortized during 2014. The loan is collateralized by Leesburg Pike and requires equal monthly principal and interest payments of $135,000 based upon a 25-year amor- tization schedule and a final payment of $11.5 million at loan maturity. Principal of $373,000 was amortized during 2014. The loan is collateralized by Village Center and requires equal monthly principal and interest payments of $119,000 based upon a 25-year amor- tization schedule and a final payment of $10.1 million at loan maturity. Principal of $314,000 was amortized during 2014. The loan is collateralized by White Oak and requires equal monthly prin- cipal and interest payments of $193,000 based upon a 24.4 year weighted amortization schedule and a final payment of $18.5 million at loan maturity. The loan was previously collateralized by Van Ness Square. During 2012, the Company substituted White Oak as the collateral and borrowed an additional $10.5 million. Principal of $514,000 was amor- tized during 2014. The loan is collateralized by Avenel Business Park and requires equal monthly principal and interest payments of $246,000 based upon a 25- year amortization schedule and a final payment of $20.9 million at loan maturity. Principal of $664,000 was amortized during 2014. The loan is collateralized by Ashburn Village and requires equal monthly principal and interest payments of $240,000 based upon a 25-year amor- tization schedule and a final payment of $20.5 million at loan maturity. Principal of $641,000 was amortized during 2014. The loan is collateralized by Ravenwood and requires equal monthly prin- cipal and interest payments of $111,000 based upon a 25-year amortization schedule and a final payment of $10.1 million at loan ma- turity. Principal of $352,000 was amortized during 2014. The loan is collateralized by Clarendon Center and requires equal monthly principal and interest payments of $753,000 based upon a 25-year amor- tization schedule and a final payment of $70.5 million at loan maturity. Principal of $2.8 million was amortized during 2014. The loan is collateralized by Severna Park MarketPlace and requires equal monthly principal and interest payments of $207,000 based upon a 25- year amortization schedule and a final payment of $20.3 million at loan maturity. Principal of $950,000 was amortized during 2014. The loan is collateralized by Kentlands Square II and requires equal monthly principal and interest payments of $240,000 based upon a 25- year amortization schedule and a final payment of $23.1 million at loan maturity. Principal of $1,042,000 was amortized during 2014. The loan is collateralized by Cranberry Square and requires equal monthly principal and interest payments of $113,000 based upon a 25-year amor- tization schedule and a final payment of $10.9 million at loan maturity. Principal of $473,000 was amortized during 2014. (aa) The loan in the original amount of $73.0 million closed in May 2012, is collateralized by Seven Corners and requires equal monthly principal and interest payments of $463,200 based upon a 25-year amortization sched- ule and a final payment of $42.3 million at loan maturity. Principal of $1.5 million was amortized during 2014. (bb) The loan is collateralized by Hampshire Langley and requires equal monthly principal and interest payments of $95,400 based upon a 25 - year amortization schedule and a final payment of $9.5 million at loan maturity. Principal of $437,000 was amortized in 2014. (cc) The loan is collateralized by Beacon Center and requires equal monthly principal and interest payments of $203,200 based upon a 20-year amor- tization schedule and a final payment of $11.4 million at loan maturity. Principal of $1,251,000 was amortized in 2014. (dd) The loan is collateralized by Seabreeze Plaza and requires equal monthly principal and interest payments of $94,900 based upon a 25-year amor- tization schedule and a final payment of $9.5 million at loan maturity. Principal of $433,000 was amortized in 2014. 2014 ANNUAL REPORT 47 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (ee) The loan is a $71.6 million construction-to-permanent facility that is col- lateralized by and will finance a portion of the construction costs of Park Van Ness. During the construction period, interest will be funded by the loan. After conversion to a permanent loan, monthly principal and interest payments totaling $413,500 will be required based upon a 25-year amor- tization schedule. A final payment of $39.6 million will be due at maturity. The Company entered into a sale-leaseback transaction with its Olney property and is accounting for that transaction as a secured financing. The arrangement requires monthly payments of $60,400 which increase by 1.5% on May 1, 2015, and every May 1 thereafter. The arrangement provides for a final payment of $14.7 million and has an implicit interest rate of 8.0%. Negative amortization in 2014 totaled $119,000. (ff) (gg) The loan is a $275.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility. Interest accrues at a rate equal to the sum of one-month LIBOR plus a spread of 145 basis points. The line may be extended at the Company’s option for one year with payment of a fee of 0.15%. Monthly payments, if required, are interest only and vary depending upon the amount outstanding and the applicable interest rate for any given month. (ii) (hh) The loan is collateralized by Northrock and requires monthly principal and interest payments of approximately $47,000 and a final payment of $14.2 million at maturity. Principal of $277,000 was amortized during 2014. The loan is collateralized by Metro Pike Center and requires monthly prin- cipal and interest payments of approximately $48,000 and a final payment of $14.8 million at loan maturity. Principal of $288,000 was amortized during 2014. The carrying value of the properties collateralizing the mortgage notes payable totaled $895.5 million and $907.2 million, as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The Company’s credit facility requires the Company and its subsidiaries to main- tain certain financial covenants, which are summarized below. The Company was in compliance as of December 31, 2014. • maintain tangible net worth, as defined in the loan agree- ment, of at least $542.1 million plus 80% of the Company’s net equity proceeds received after March 2014; • • • limit the amount of debt as a percentage of gross asset value, as defined in the loan agreement, to less than 60% (leverage ratio); limit the amount of debt so that interest coverage will ex- ceed 2.0 x on a trailing four-quarter basis (interest expense coverage); and limit the amount of debt so that interest, scheduled principal amortization and preferred dividend coverage exceeds 1.3x on a trailing four-quarter basis (fixed charge coverage). Mortgage notes payable at each of December 31, 2014 and 2013, totaling $51.0 million, are guaranteed by members of the Saul Organization. As of December 31, 2014, the sched- uled maturities of all debt including scheduled principal amortization for years ended December 31 are as follows: DEBT MATURITY SCHEDULE Scheduled Balloon Principal (In thousands) Payments Amortization Total 2015 $ 14,885 $ 23,192 $ 38,077 2016 28,879 23,496 52,375 2017 — 24,679 24,679 2018 70,748 (a) 24,822 95,570 2019 60,794 23,489 84,283 Thereafter 426,652 135,752 562,404 Total $ 601,958 $ 255,430 $ 857,388 (a) Includes $43.0 million outstanding under the line of credit. 48 SAUL CENTERS, INC. The components of interest expense are set forth below. INTEREST EXPENSE Year ended December 31, (In thousands) 2014 2013 2012 Interest incurred $ 45,396 $ 45,502 $ 48,010 Amortization of deferred debt costs 1,327 1,257 1,576 Capitalized interest (689) (170) (42) Total $ 46,034 $ 46,589 $ 49,544 Deferred debt costs capitalized during the years ending Decem- ber 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 totaled $1.3 million, $3.2 million and $2.2 million, respectively. 6. LEASE AGREEMENTS Lease income includes primarily base rent arising from non- cancelable leases. Base rent (including straight-line rent) for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012, amounted to $164.6 million, $159.9 million, and $152.8 million, respec- tively. Future contractual payments under noncancelable leases for years ended December 31 (which exclude the effect of straight-line rents), are as follows: FUTURE CONTRACTUAL RENT PAYMENTS (In thousands) 2015 $ 152,661 2016 135,703 2017 116,025 2018 96,439 2019 73,626 Thereafter 275,551 Total $ 850,005 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The majority of the leases provide for rental increases and ex- pense recoveries based on fixed annual increases or increases in the Consumer Price Index and increases in operating ex- penses. The expense recoveries generally are payable in equal installments throughout the year based on estimates, with ad- justments made in the succeeding year. Expense recoveries for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012, amounted to $32.1 million, $30.9 million, and $30.4 million, respectively. In addition, certain retail leases provide for per- centage rent based on sales in excess of the minimum specified in the tenant’s lease. Percentage rent amounted to $1.5 million, $1.6 million, and $1.5 million, for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively. 7. LONG-TERM LEASE OBLIGATIONS Certain properties are subject to noncancelable long-term leases which apply to land underlying the Shopping Centers. Certain of the leases provide for periodic adjustments of the base annual rent and require the payment of real estate taxes on the underlying land. The leases will expire between 2058 and 2068. Reflected in the accompanying consolidated finan- cial statements is minimum ground rent expense of $176,000, $176,000, and $176,000, for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively. The future minimum rental commitments under these ground leases are as follows: LONG-TERM LEASE OBLIGATIONS Year ending December 31, (In thousands) 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Thereafter Total Beacon Center $ 60 $ 60 $ 60 $ 60 $ 60 $ 2,541 $ 2,841 Olney 56 56 56 56 57 3,760 4,041 Southdale 60 60 60 60 60 2,885 3,185 Total $ 176 $ 176 $ 176 $ 176 $ 177 $ 9,186 $ 10,067 In addition to the above, Flagship Center consists of two devel- oped out parcels that are part of a larger adjacent community shopping center formerly owned by the Saul Organization and sold to an affiliate of a tenant in 1991. The Company has a 90- year ground leasehold interest which commenced in September 1991 with a minimum rent of one dollar per year. Countryside shopping center was acquired in February 2004. Because of cer- tain land use considerations, approximately 3.4% of the underlying land is held under a 99-year ground lease. The lease requires the Company to pay minimum rent of one dollar per year as well as its pro-rata share of the real estate taxes. The Company’s corporate headquarters space is leased by a member of the Saul Organization. The lease commenced in March 2002 was extended in 2012 for five years, and provides for base rent increases of 3% per year, with payment of a pro- rata share of operating expenses over a base year amount. The Company and the Saul Organization entered into a Shared Serv- ices Agreement whereby each party pays an allocation of total rental payments based on a percentage proportionate to the number of employees employed by each party. The Company’s rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012 was $840,800, $850,600, and $850,000, respec- tively. Expenses arising from the lease are included in general and administrative expense (see Note 9 – Related Party Transactions). 8. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND NONCONTROLLING INTEREST The Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012 reflect noncontrolling interest of $11.0 million, $4.0 million, and $6.4 million, re- spectively, representing the Saul Organization’s share of the net income for the year. In November 2003, the Company sold 4,000,000 depositary shares, each representing 1/100th of a share of 8% Series A Cu- mulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (the "Series A Stock"). The depositary shares are redeemable, in whole or in part at the Company’s option, from time to time, at $25.00 per share. The depositary shares pay an annual dividend of $2.00 per share, equivalent to 8% of the $25.00 per share liquidation preference. The Series A preferred stock has no stated maturity, is not subject to any sinking fund or mandatory redemption and is not con- vertible into any other securities of the Company. Investors in the depositary shares generally have no voting rights, but will have limited voting rights if the Company fails to pay dividends for six or more quarters (whether or not declared or consecutive) and in certain other events. In March 2013, the Company redeemed 60% of its then-outstanding Series A Stock. In December 2014, the Company redeemed the remaining outstanding Series A Stock. Costs associated with the redemptions were charged against accumulated deficit in the respective periods. 2014 ANNUAL REPORT 49 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS In March 2008, the Company sold 3,173,115 depositary shares, each representing 1/100th of a share of 9% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (the "Series B Stock"). The depositary shares may be redeemed at the Company’s op- tion, on or after March 15, 2013, in whole or in part, at $25.00 per share. The depositary shares pay an annual dividend of $2.25 per share, equivalent to 9% of the $25.00 per share liq- uidation preference. The Series B preferred stock has no stated maturity, is not subject to any sinking fund or mandatory re- demption and is not convertible into any other securities of the Company. Investors in the depositary shares generally have no voting rights, but will have limited voting rights if the Company fails to pay dividends for six or more quarters (whether or not declared or consecutive) and in certain other events. In March 2013, the Company redeemed all of its Series B Stock. Costs associated with the redemption were charged against accumu- lated deficit. On February 12, 2013, the Company sold, in an underwritten public offering, 5.6 million depositary shares, each representing 1/100th of a share of 6.875% Series C Cumulative Re- deemable Preferred Stock ("Series C Stock"), and received net cash proceeds of approximately $135.2 million. The depositary shares may be redeemed on or after February 12, 2018 at the Company’s option, in whole or in part, at the $25.00 liquida- tion preference plus accrued but unpaid dividends. The depositary shares pay an annual dividend of $1.71875 per share, equivalent to 6.875% of the $25.00 liquidation prefer- ence. The first dividend was paid on April 15, 2013 and covered the period from February 12, 2013 through March 31, 2013. The Series C Stock has no stated maturity, is not subject to any sinking fund or mandatory redemption and is not con- vertible into any other securities of the Company except in connection with certain changes of control or delisting events. Investors in the depositary shares generally have no voting rights, but will have limited voting rights if the Company fails to pay dividends for six or more quarters (whether or not declared or consecutive) and in certain other events. On November 12, 2014, the Company sold, in an underwritten public offering, 1.6 million depositary shares of Series C Stock and received net cash proceeds of approximately $39.3 million (the "Additional Series C Stock"). The terms of Additional Series C Stock are identical to the Series C Stock. 9. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, the President and Chief Operating Officer, the Executive Vice President-Chief Legal and Administrative Officer and the Senior Vice President- Chief Accounting Officer of the Company are also officers of various members of the Saul Organization and their manage- ment time is shared with the Saul Organization. Their annual compensation is fixed by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, with the exception of the Senior Vice Presi- dent-Chief Accounting Officer whose share of annual 50 SAUL CENTERS, INC. compensation allocated to the Company is determined by the shared services agreement (described below). The Company participates in a multiemployer 401K plan with entities in the Saul Organization which covers those full-time employees who meet the requirements as specified in the plan. Company contributions, which are included in general and ad- ministrative expense or property operating expenses in the consolidated statements of operations, at the discretionary amount of up to six percent of the employee’s cash compensa- tion, subject to certain limits, were $379,000, $369,000, and $379,000, for 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively. All amounts deferred by employees and contributed by the Com- pany are fully vested. The Company also participates in a multiemployer nonqualified deferred compensation plan with entities in the Saul Organiza- tion which covers those full-time employees who meet the requirements as specified in the plan. According to the plan, which can be modified or discontinued at any time, participating employees defer 2% of their compensation in excess of a spec- ified amount. For the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012, the Company contributed three times the amount deferred by employees. The Company’s expense, included in general and administrative expense, totaled $192,800, $191,300, and $238,000, for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively. All amounts deferred by employees and the Company are fully vested. The cumulative unfunded liability under this plan was $1.8 million and $1.6 million, at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and is included in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other lia- bilities in the consolidated balance sheets. The Company has entered into a shared services agreement (the “Agreement”) with the Saul Organization that provides for the sharing of certain personnel and ancillary functions such as computer hardware, software, and support services and certain direct and indirect administrative personnel. The method for de- termining the cost of the shared services is provided for in the Agreement and is based upon head count, estimates of usage or estimates of time incurred, as applicable. Senior manage- ment has determined that the final allocations of shared costs are reasonable. The terms of the Agreement and the payments made thereunder are reviewed annually by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, which consists entirely of independent directors. Billings by the Saul Organization for the Company’s share of these ancillary costs and expenses for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012, which included rental expense for the Company’s headquarters lease (see Note 7. Long Term Lease Obligations), totaled $7.4 million, $6.3 mil- lion, and $6.0 million, respectively. The amounts are expensed when incurred and are primarily reported as general and ad- ministrative expenses or capitalized to specific development projects in these consolidated financial statements. As of De- cember 31, 2014 and 2013, accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities included $543,000 and $499,000, respectively, representing billings due to the Saul NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Organization for the Company’s share of these ancillary costs and expenses. The Company has entered into a shared third-party predevel- opment cost agreement with the B. F. Saul Real Estate Investment Trust, a member of the Saul Organization (the “Predevelopment Agreement”). The Predevelopment Agreement, which expires on December 31, 2015, and which may be extended to December 31, 2016, relates to the sharing of third-party predevelopment costs incurred in connection with the planning of the future re- development of certain adjacent real estate assets in the Twinbrook area of Rockville, Maryland. The costs will be billed by the third-parties on a pro rata basis based on the acreage owned by each entity and neither party is obligated to advance funds to the other. The B. F. Saul Insurance Agency of Maryland, Inc., a subsidiary of the B. F. Saul Company and a member of the Saul Organiza- tion, is a general insurance agency that receives commissions and counter-signature fees in connection with the Company’s in- surance program. Such commissions and fees amounted to approximately $427,300, $447,300, and $372,000, for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively. Effective as of September 4, 2012, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with B. F. Saul III, one of the Company’s former presidents, whereby Mr. Saul III provided certain consult- ing services to the Company as an independent contractor and was paid at a rate of $60,000 per month. The consulting agreement included certain noncompete, nonsolicitation and nondisclosure covenants, and expired in September 2014. Dur- ing 2014, 2013 and 2012 such consulting fees totaled $495,000, $720,000 and $225,000, respectively. 10. STOCK OPTION PLAN The Company established a stock option plan in 1993 (the “1993 Plan”) for the purpose of attracting and retaining exec- utive officers and other key personnel. The 1993 Plan provides for grants of options to purchase up to 400,000 shares of com- mon stock. The 1993 Plan authorizes the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors to grant options at an ex- ercise price which may not be less than the market value of the common stock on the date the option is granted. At the annual meeting of the Company’s stockholders in 2004, the stockholders approved the adoption of the 2004 stock plan for the purpose of attracting and retaining executive officers, di- rectors and other key personnel. The 2004 stock plan was subsequently amended by the Company’s stockholders at the 2008 Annual Meeting and further amended at the 2013 Annual Meeting (the “Amended 2004 Plan”). The Amended 2004 Plan, which terminates in 2023, provides for grants of options to pur- chase up to 2,000,000 shares of common stock as well as grants of up to 200,000 shares of common stock to directors. The Amended 2004 Plan authorizes the Compensation Com- mittee of the Board of Directors to grant options at an exercise price which may not be less than the market value of the com- mon stock on the date the option is granted. Effective May 6, 2005, the Compensation Committee granted options to purchase 162,500 shares (35,500 incentive stock options and 127,000 nonqualified stock options) to twelve Company officers and to twelve Company directors (the “2005 Options”), which expire on May 5, 2015. The officers’ 2005 Options vested 25% per year over four years and are subject to early expiration upon termination of employment. The directors’ options were immediately exercisable. The exercise price of $33.22 per share was the closing market price of the Com- pany’s common stock on the date of the award. Using the Black- Scholes model, the Company determined the total fair value of the 2005 Options to be $484,500, of which $413,400 and $71,100 were the values assigned to the officer options and director options, respectively. Because the directors’ options vested immediately, the entire $71,100 was expensed as of the date of grant. The expense of the officers’ options was recog- nized as compensation expense monthly during the four years the options vested. Effective May 1, 2006, the Compensation Committee granted options to purchase 30,000 shares (all nonqualified stock op- tions) to twelve Company directors (the “2006 Options”), which were immediately exercisable and expire on April 30, 2016. The exercise price of $40.35 per share was the closing market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of the award. Using the Black-Scholes model, the Company determined the total fair value of the 2006 Options to be $143,400. Because the directors’ options vested immediately, the entire $143,400 was expensed as of the date of grant. No options were granted to the Company’s officers in 2006. Effective April 27, 2007, the Compensation Committee granted options to purchase 165,000 shares (27,560 incentive stock options and 137,440 nonqualified stock options) to thirteen Company officers and twelve Company Directors (the “2007 options”), which expire on April 26, 2017. The officers’ 2007 Options vest 25% per year over four years and are subject to early expiration upon termination of employment. The directors’ options were immediately exercisable. The exercise price of $54.17 per share was the closing market price of the Com- pany’s common stock on the date of award. Using the Black- Scholes model, the Company determined the total fair value of the 2007 Options to be $1.5 million, of which $1.3 million and $285,300 were the values assigned to the officer options and director options, respectively. Because the directors’ options vested immediately, the entire $285,300 was expensed as of the date of grant. The expense for the officers’ options was rec- ognized as compensation expense monthly during the four years the options vested. 2014 ANNUAL REPORT 51 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Effective April 25, 2008, the Compensation Committee granted options to purchase 30,000 shares (all nonqualified stock op- tions) to twelve Company directors (the “2008 Options”), which were immediately exercisable and expire on April 24, 2018. The exercise price of $50.15 per share was the closing market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of the award. Using the Black-Scholes model, the Company determined the total fair value of the 2008 Options to be $254,700. Because the directors’ options vest immediately, the entire $254,700 was expensed as of the date of grant. No options were granted to the Company’s officers in 2008. Effective April 24, 2009, the Compensation Committee granted options to purchase 32,500 shares (all nonqualified stock op- tions) to thirteen Company directors (the “2009 Options”), which were immediately exercisable and expire on April 23, 2019. The exercise price of $32.68 per share was the closing market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of the award. Using the Black-Scholes model, the Company de- termined the total fair value of the 2009 Options to be $222,950. Because the directors’ options vested immediately, the entire $222,950 was expensed as of the date of grant. No options were granted to the Company’s officers in 2009. Effective May 7, 2010, the Compensation Committee granted options to purchase 32,500 shares (all nonqualified stock op- tions) to thirteen Company directors (the “2010 Options”), which were immediately exercisable and expire on May 6, 2020. The exercise price of $38.76 per share was the closing market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of the award. Using the Black-Scholes model, the Company de- termined the total fair value of the 2010 Options to be $287,950. Because the directors’ options vested immediately, the entire $287,950 was expensed as of the date of grant. No options were granted to the Company’s officers in 2010. Effective May 13, 2011, the Compensation Committee granted options to purchase 195,000 shares (65,300 incentive stock options and 129,700 nonqualified stock options) to fifteen Company officers and thirteen Company Directors (the “2011 options”), which expire on May 12, 2021. The officers’ 2011 Options vest 25% per year over four years and are subject to early expiration upon termination of employment. The directors’ 2011 options were immediately exercisable. The exercise price of $41.82 per share was the closing market price of the Com- pany’s common stock on the date of award. Using the Black-Scholes model, the Company determined the total fair value of the 2011 Options to be $1.6 million, of which $1.3 million and $297,375 were assigned to the officer options and director options, respectively. Because the directors’ options vested immediately, the entire $297,375 was expensed as of the date of grant. The expense for the officers’ options is being recognized as compensation expense monthly during the four years the options vest. 52 SAUL CENTERS, INC. Effective May 4, 2012, the Compensation Committee granted options to purchase 277,500 shares (26,157 incentive stock options and 251,343 nonqualified stock options) to fifteen Company officers and fourteen Company Directors (the “2012 options”), which expire on May 3, 2022. The officers’ 2012 Options vest 25% per year over four years and are subject to early expiration upon termination of employment. The directors’ 2012 Options were immediately exercisable. The exercise price of $39.29 per share was the closing market price of the Com- pany’s common stock on the date of award. Using the Black-Scholes model, the Company determined the total fair value of the 2012 Options to be $1.7 million, of which $1.4 million and $257,250 were assigned to the officer options and director options, respectively. Because the directors’ options vested immediately, the entire $257,250 was expensed as of the date of grant. The expense for the officers’ options is being recognized as compensation expense monthly during the four years the options vest. Effective May 10, 2013, the Compensation Committee granted options to purchase 237,500 shares (35,592 incentive stock options and 201,908 nonqualified stock options) to fifteen Company officers and fourteen Company Directors (the "2013 options"), which expire on May 9, 2023. The officers' 2013 Op- tions vest 25% per year over four years and are subject to early expiration upon termination of employment. The directors' 2013 options were immediately exercisable. The exercise price of $44.42 per share was the closing market price of the Com- pany's common stock on the date of award. Using the Black-Scholes model, the Company determined the total fair value of the 2013 Options to be $1.5 million, of which $1.3 million and $0.3 million were assigned to the officer options and director options, respectively. Because the directors' options vested immediately, the entire $0.3 million was expensed as of the date of grant. The expense for the officers' options is being recognized as compensation expense monthly during the four years the option was vested. Effective May 9, 2014, the Compensation Committee granted options to purchase 200,000 shares (29,300 incentive stock options and 170,700 nonqualified stock options) to eighteen Company officers and twelve Company Directors (the “2014 options”), which expire on May 8, 2024. The officers’ 2014 Options vest 25% per year over four years and are subject to early expiration upon termination of employment. The directors’ 2014 Options were immediately exercisable. The exercise price of $47.03 per share was the closing market price of the Com- pany’s common stock on the date of award. Using the Black-Scholes model, the Company determined the total fair value of the 2014 Options to be $1.3 million, of which $1.2 million and $109,500 were assigned to the officer options and director options, respectively. Because the directors’ options vested immediately, the entire $109,500 was expensed as of the date of grant. The expense for the officers’ options is being recognized as compensation expense monthly during the four years the options vest. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The following table summarizes the amount and activity of each grant, the total value and variables used in the computation and the amount expensed and included in general and administrative expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012: STOCK OPTIONS ISSUED TO DIRECTORS Grant date Total grant Vested Exercised Forfeited Exercisable at December 31, 2014 5/6/2005 5/1/2006 4/27/2007 4/25/2008 4/24/2009 5/7/2010 5/13/2011 5/4/2012 5/10/2013 5/9/2014 Subtotals 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 32,500 32,500 32,500 35,000 35,000 30,000 317,500 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 32,500 32,500 32,500 35,000 35,000 30,000 317,500 22,500 10,000 — — 20,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 7,500 — 90,000 — 2,500 7,500 7,500 — 2,500 2,500 — — — 22,500 7,500 17,500 22,500 22,500 12,500 20,000 20,000 25,000 27,500 30,000 205,000 Remaining unexercised 7,500 17,500 22,500 22,500 12,500 20,000 20,000 25,000 27,500 30,000 205,000 Exercise price $ 33.22 $ 40.35 $ 54.17 $ 50.15 $ 32.68 $ 38.76 $ 41.82 $ 39.29 $ 44.42 $ 47.03 Volatility 0.198 0.206 0.225 0.237 0.344 0.369 0.358 0.348 0.333 0.173 Expected life (years) 10.0 9.0 8.0 7.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Assumed yield Risk-free rate Gross value at grant date Expensed in 6.91% 5.93% 4.39% 4.09% 4.54% 4.23% 4.16% 4.61% 4.53% 4.48% 4.28% 5.11% 4.65% 3.49% 2.19% 2.17% 1.86% 0.78% 0.82% 1.63% $ 71,100 $143,400 $285,300 $254,700 $222,950 $287,950 $297,375 $257,250 $278,250 $109,500 $ 2,207,775 previous years 71,100 143,400 285,300 254,700 222,950 287,950 297,375 — — — 1,562,775 Expensed in 2012 — — — — — — — 257,250 — — 257,250 Expensed in 2013 — — — — — — — — 278,250 — 278,250 Expensed in 2014 — — — — — — — — — 109,500 109,500 Future expense — — — — — — — — — — — Grant date Total grant Vested Exercised Forfeited Exercisable at December 31, 2014 STOCK OPTIONS ISSUED TO OFFICERS AND GRAND TOTALS 5/6/2005 4/27/2007 5/13/2011 5/4/2012 5/10/2013 5/9/2014 Subtotals 132,500 135,000 162,500 242,500 202,500 170,000 1,045,000 118,750 67,500 105,625 56,250 50,625 — 398,750 115,750 3,528 46,889 30,000 15,625 — 211,792 13,750 67,500 43,750 135,000 30,000 — 290,000 3,000 63,972 47,486 26,250 35,000 — 175,708 Remaining unexercised 3,000 63,972 71,861 77,500 156,875 170,000 543,208 Exercise price $ 33.22 $ 54.17 $ 41.82 $ 39.29 $ 44.42 $ 47.03 Volatility 0.207 0.233 0.330 0.315 0.304 0.306 Expected life (years) 8.0 6.5 8.0 8.0 8.0 7.0 Assumed yield Risk-free rate Gross value at grant date 6.37% 4.13% 4.81% 5.28% 5.12% 4.89% 4.15% 4.61% 2.75% 1.49% 1.49% 2.17% $ 413,400 $1,339,200 $1,366,625 $1,518,050 $1,401,300 $1,349,800 $7,388,375 Estimated forfeitures 35,100 62,000 387,550 889,690 280,468 168,749 1,823,557 Expensed in previous years 378,300 1,277,200 186,347 — — — 1,841,847 Expensed in 2012 — — 270,391 104,724 — — 375,115 Expensed in 2013 — — 235,350 157,083 209,027 — 601,460 Expensed in 2014 — — 217,475 157,092 283,910 196,848 855,325 Future expense — — 69,512 209,461 627,895 984,203 1,891,071 Weighted average term of remaining future expense 2.7 years Grand Totals 1,362,500 716,250 301,792 312,500 380,708 748,208 $9,596,150 1,823,557 3,404,622 632,365 879,710 964,825 1,891,071 2014 ANNUAL REPORT 53 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2014 2013 2012 Weighted Average Weighted Average Weighted Average Shares Exercise Price Shares Exercise Price Shares Exercise Price OPTION ACTIVITY Outstanding at January 1 753,625 $ 42.55 570,840 $ 41.04 674,585 $ 40.40 Granted 200,000 47.03 237,500 44.42 277,500 39.29 Exercised (167,917) 37.71 (49,715) 33.15 (149,995) 31.03 Expired/Forfeited (37,500) 43.56 (5,000) 52.16 (231,250) 43.56 Outstanding December 31 748,208 44.79 753,625 42.55 570,840 41.04 Exercisable at December 31 380,708 44.85 413,000 42.42 377,715 41.41 The intrinsic value of options exercised in 2014, 2013, and 2012, was $2.0 million, $0.6 million and $1.6 million, respec- tively. The intrinsic value of options outstanding and exercisable at year end 2014 was $9.3 million and $4.7 million, respectively. The intrinsic value measures the difference between the options’ exercise price and the closing share price quoted by the New York Stock Exchange as of the date of measurement. The date of ex- ercise was the measurement date for shares exercised during the period. At December 31, 2014, the final trading day of calendar 2014, the closing price of $57.19 per share was used for the calculation of aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding and exercisable at that date. At December 31, 2014, there were no options with an exercise price in excess of the market closing price. The weighted average remaining contractual life of the Company’s exercisable and outstanding options at December 31, 2014 are 5.4 and 7.0 years, respectively. 11. NON-OPERATING ITEMS Gain on casualty settlement in 2013 and 2012 reflect insurance proceeds received in excess of the carrying value of assets dam- aged during a hail storm at French Market in 2012. The insurance proceeds funded substantially all of the restoration of the damaged property. to the carrying value of $784.8 million and $789.9 million at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. A change in any of the significant inputs may lead to a change in the Company’s fair value measurement of its debt. Effective June 30, 2011, the Company determined that one of its interest-rate swap arrangements was a highly effective hedge of the cash flows under one of its variable-rate mortgage loans and designated the swap as a cash flow hedge of that mort- gage. The swap is carried at fair value with changes in fair value recognized either in income or comprehensive income depend- ing on the effectiveness of the swap. The following chart summarizes the changes in fair value of the Company’s swaps for the indicated periods. SWAPS FAIR VALUE Year ended December 31, (In thousands) 2014 2013 2012 Increase (decrease) in fair value: Recognized in earnings $ (10) $ (7) $ 36 Recognized in other comprehensive income (675) 2,897 (932) Total $(685) $ 2,890 $ (896) 12. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts re- ceivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses are reasonable estimates of their fair value. The aggregate fair value of the notes payable with fixed-rate payment terms was determined using Level 3 data in a discounted cash flow approach, which is based upon management’s estimate of borrowing rates and loan terms cur- rently available to the Company for fixed rate financing, and assuming long term interest rates of approximately 3.65% and 4.85%, would be approximately $886.4 million and $828.7 mil- lion as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, compared The Company carries its interest rate swaps at fair value. The Company has determined the majority of the inputs used to value its derivative fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy with the exception of the impact of counter-party risk, which was determined using Level 3 inputs and are not significant. Deriv- ative instruments are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy because their values are determined using third-party pricing models which contain inputs that are derived from ob- servable market data. Where possible, the values produced by the pricing models are verified by the market prices. Valuation models require a variety of inputs, including contractual terms, market prices, yield curves, credit spreads, measure of volatility, and correlations of such inputs. The swap agreement terminates 54 SAUL CENTERS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS on July 1, 2020. As of December 31, 2014, the fair value of the interest-rate swap was approximately $3.2 million and is in- cluded in “Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities” in the consolidated balance sheets. The decrease in value from inception of the swap designated as a cash flow hedge is reflected in “Other Comprehensive Income” in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. 13. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES Neither the Company nor the Current Portfolio Properties are subject to any material litigation, nor, to management’s knowl- edge, is any material litigation currently threatened against the Company, other than routine litigation and administrative proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. Management believes that these items, individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse impact on the Company or the Current Portfolio Properties. 14. DISTRIBUTIONS In December 1995, the Company established a Dividend Rein- vestment and Stock Purchase Plan (the “Plan”), to allow its stockholders and holders of limited partnership interests an opportunity to buy additional shares of common stock by rein- vesting all or a portion of their dividends or distributions. The Plan provides for investing in newly issued shares of common stock at a 3% discount from market price without payment of any brokerage commissions, service charges or other expenses. All expenses of the Plan are paid by the Company. The Operating Partnership also maintains a similar dividend reinvestment plan that mirrors the Plan, which allows holders of limited partnership interests the opportunity to buy either additional limited partner- ship units or common stock shares of the Company. The Company paid common stock distributions of $1.56 per share in 2014 and $1.44 per share during each of 2013 and 2012, Series A preferred stock dividends of $2.41 per share in 2014 and $2.00 per depositary share during each of 2013 and 2012, Series B preferred stock dividends of $0.99 and $2.25 per share during 2013 and 2012, respectively, and Series C preferred stock dividends of $1.72 and $1.09 per depository share during 2014 and 2013, respectively. Of the common stock dividends paid, $1.56 per share, $0.96 per share, and $0.95 per share, represented ordinary dividend income in 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively and $0.48 per share and $0.49 per share, represented return of capital to the sharehold- ers in 2013 and 2012, respectively. All of the preferred stock dividends paid were considered ordinary dividend income. The following summarizes distributions paid during the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012, and includes ac- tivity in the Plan as well as limited partnership units issued from the reinvestment of unit distributions: Total Distributions to Dividend Reinvestments Limited Common Limiited Average (Dollars in thousands, Preferred Common Partnership Stock Shares Discounted Partnership Unit except per share amounts) Stockholders Stockholders Unitholders Issued Share Price Units Issued Price Distributions during 2014 October 31 $ 3,856 $ 8,348 $ 2,879 40,142 $ 52.71 July 31 3,206 8,314 2,879 57,696 46.79 April 30 3,206 8,269 2,838 60,212 44.14 104,831 $ 44.77 January 31 3,206 7,415 2,521 39,588 45.15 91,352 45.80 Total 2014 $ 13,474 $ 32,346 $ 11,117 197,638 196,183 Distributions during 2013 October 31 $ 3,206 $ 7,388 $ 2,489 48,836 $ 46.27 88,309 $ 46.93 July 31 3,206 7,327 2,489 138,019 45.21 April 30 4,364 7,272 2,489 142,839 42.85 January 31 3,785 7,218 2,489 145,468 41.67 Total 2013 $ 14,561 $ 29,205 $ 9,956 475,162 88,309 Distributions during 2012 October 31 $ 3,785 $ 7,120 $ 2,489 141,960 $ 42.23 July 31 3,785 7,063 2,489 144,881 40.43 April 30 3,785 7,005 2,489 145,118 38.93 January 31 3,785 6,947 2,489 163,429 34.44 Total 2012 $ 15,140 $ 28,135 $ 9,956 595,388 2014 ANNUAL REPORT 55 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS In December 2014, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized a distribution of $0.40 per common share payable in January 2015, to holders of record on January 16, 2015. As a result, $8.4 million was paid to common shareholders on January 30, 2015. Also, $2.9 million was paid to limited part- nership unitholders on January 30, 2015 ($0.40 per Operating Partnership unit). The Board of Directors authorized preferred stock dividends of $0.4297 per Series C depositary share to holders of record on January 7, 2015. As a result, $3.1 million was paid to preferred shareholders on January 15, 2015. These amounts are reflected as a reduction of stockholders’ equity in the case of common stock and preferred stock dividends and noncontrolling interests deductions in the case of limited partner distributions and are included in dividends and distributions payable in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. 15. INTERIM RESULTS (UNAUDITED) The following summary presents the results of operations of the Company for the quarterly periods of calendar years 2014 and 2013. (In thousands, except per share amounts) 2014 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Revenue $ 52,947 $ 52,286 $ 50,595 $ 51,264 Operating income before loss on early extinguishment of debt, gain on casualty settlement, and noncontrolling interests 12,713 14,423 12,479 12,314 Gain on sales of properties — 6,069 — — Net income attributable to Saul Centers, Inc. 10,287 16,054 10,106 10,496 Net income available to common shareholders 7,081 12,847 6,900 5,274 Net income available to common shareholders per diluted share 0.34 0.62 0.33 0.25 2013 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Revenue $ 49,186 $ 48,809 $ 49,756 $ 50,146 Operating income before loss on early extinguishment of debt, gain on casualty settlement, and noncontrolling interests 3,388 7,711 11,959 12,211 Net income attributable to Saul Centers, Inc. 4,984 6,594 9,398 9,896 Net income (loss) available to common shareholders (4,608) 3,387 6,192 6,690 Net income (loss) available to common shareholders per diluted share (0.23) 0.17 0.30 0.33 56 SAUL CENTERS, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 16. BUSINESS SEGMENTS The Company has two reportable business segments: Shopping Centers and Mixed-Use Properties. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies (see Note 2). The Company evaluates performance based upon income and cash flows from real estate for the combined properties in each segment. All of our properties within each segment generate similar types of revenues and expenses related to tenant rent, reimbursements and operating expenses. Although services are provided to a range of tenants, the types of services provided to them are sim- ilar within each segment. The properties in each portfolio have similar economic characteristics and the nature of the products and services provided to our tenants and the method to distrib- ute such services are consistent throughout the portfolio. Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year information to conform to the 2014 presentation. Shopping Mixed-Use Corporate and Consolidated (In thousands) Centers Properties Other Totals As of or for the year ended December 31, 2014 Real estate rental operations: Revenue $ 154,385 $ 52,632 $ 75 $ 207,092 Expenses (33,781) (15,732) — (49,513) Income from real estate 120,604 36,900 75 157,579 Interest expense and amortization of deferred debt costs — — (46,034) (46,034) General and administrative — — (16,961) (16,961) Subtotal 120,604 36,900 (62,920) 94,584 Depreciation and amortization of deferred leasing costs (28,082) (13,121) — (41,203) Acquisition related costs (949) — — (949) Predevelopment expenses — (503) — (503) Change in fair value of derivatives — — (10) (10) Gain on sale of property 6,069 — — 6,069 Net income (loss) $ 97,642 $ 23,276 $ (62,930) $ 57,988 Capital investment $ 66,508 $ 23,760 $ — $ 90,268 Total assets $ 946,819 $ 307,901 $ 12,267 $ 1,266,987 As of or for the year ended December 31, 2013 Real estate rental operations: Revenue $ 145,219 $ 52,609 $ 69 $ 197,897 Expenses (30,729) (17,213) — (47,942) Income from real estate 114,490 35,396 69 149,955 Interest expense and amortization of deferred debt costs — — (46,589) (46,589) General and administrative — — (14,951) (14,951) Subtotal 114,490 35,396 (61,471) 88,415 Depreciation and amortization of deferred leasing costs (27,340) (21,790) — (49,130) Acquisition related costs (106) — — (106) Predevelopment expenses — (3,910) — (3,910) Change in fair value of derivatives — — (7) (7) Loss on early extinguishment of debt — — (497) (497) Gain on casualty settlement 77 — — 77 Net income (loss) $ 87,121 $ 9,696 $ (61,975) $ 34,842 Capital investment $ 18,232 $ 8,207 $ — $ 26,439 Total assets $ 888,109 $ 293,512 $ 17,054 $ 1,198,675 2014 ANNUAL REPORT 57 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Shopping Mixed-Use Corporate and Consolidated (In thousands) Centers Properties Other Totals As of or for the year ended December 31, 2012 Real estate rental operations: Revenue $ 137,647 $ 52,309 $ 136 $ 190,092 Expenses (30,139) (17,131) — (47,270) Income from real estate 107,508 35,178 136 142,822 Interest expense and amortization of deferred debt costs — — (49,544) (49,544) General and administrative — — (14,274) (14,274) Subtotal 107,508 35,178 (63,682) 79,004 Depreciation and amortization of deferred leasing costs (25,667) (14,445) — (40,112) Acquisition related costs (1,129) — — (1,129) Predevelopment expenses — (2,667) — (2,667) Change in fair value of derivatives — — 36 36 Gain on casualty settlement 219 — — 219 Gains on sales of properties 4,510 — — 4,510 Loss from operations of property sold (81) — — (81) Net income (loss) $ 85,360 $ 18,066 $ (63,646) $ 39,780 Capital investment $ 46,353 $ 8,290 $ — $ 54,643 Total assets $ 894,027 $ 301,355 $ 11,927 $ 1,207,309 17. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS The Company has reviewed operating activities for the period subsequent to December 31, 2014 and prior to the date that financial statements are issued, March 6, 2015, and determined there are no subsequent events that are required to be disclosed. 58 SAUL CENTERS, INC. DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT PLAN AND DISTRIBUTIONS Dividend Reinvestment Plan Saul Centers, Inc. offers a dividend reinvestment plan which enables its shareholders to automatically invest some of or all dividends in additional shares. The plan provides shareholders with a convenient and cost-free way to increase their invest- ment in Saul Centers. Shares purchased under the dividend reinvestment plan are issued at a 3% discount from the aver- age price of the stock on the dividend payment date. The Plan’s prospectus is available for review in the Shareholders Information section of the Company’s web site. To receive more information please call the plan administrator at (800) 509-5586 and request to speak with a service repre- sentative or write: Continental Stock Transfer and Trust Company Saul Centers, Inc. Attention: Dividend Reinvestment Plan 17 Battery Place New York, NY 10004 Dividends and Distributions Under the Code, REITs are subject to numerous organizational and operating requirements, including the requirement to dis- tribute at least 90% of REIT taxable income. The Company distributed more than the required amount in 2014 and 2013. Distributions by the Company to common stockholders and holders of limited partnership units in the Operating Partner- ship were $43.5 million and $39.2 million in 2014 and 2013, respectively. Distributions to preferred stockholders were $13.5 million and $14.6 million in 2014 and 2013, respectively. See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, No. 14, “Distri- butions.” The Company may or may not elect to distribute in excess of 90% of REIT taxable income in future years. The Company’s estimate of cash flow available for distribu- tions is believed to be based on reasonable assumptions and represents a reasonable basis for setting distributions. How- ever, the actual results of operations of the Company will be affected by a variety of factors, including but not limited to ac- tual rental revenue, operating expenses of the Company, interest expense, general economic conditions, federal, state and local taxes (if any), unanticipated capital expenditures, the adequacy of reserves and preferred dividends. While the Com- pany intends to continue paying regular quarterly distributions, any future payments will be determined solely by the Board of Directors and will depend on a number of factors, including cash flow of the Company, its financial condition and capital requirements, the annual distribution amounts required to maintain its status as a REIT under the Code, and such other factors as the Board of Directors deems relevant. We are ob- ligated to pay regular quarterly distributions to holders of depositary shares, prior to distributions on the common stock. The Company paid four quarterly distributions totaling $1.56, $1.44 and $1.44 per common share during 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The annual distribution amounts paid by the Company exceeded the distribution amounts required for tax purposes. Distributions to the extent of our current and ac- cumulated earnings and profits for federal income tax purposes generally will be taxable to a stockholder as ordinary dividend income. Distributions in excess of current and accu- mulated earnings and profits will be treated as a nontaxable reduction of the stockholder’s basis in such stockholder’s shares, to the extent thereof, and thereafter as taxable gain. Distributions that are treated as a reduction of the stock- holder’s basis in its shares will have the effect of deferring taxation until the sale of the stockholder’s shares. All of the 2014 common dividends were treated as taxable dividends. Of the $1.44 per common share dividend paid in 2013, 67% was treated as a taxable dividend and 33% was treated as a return of capital. Of the $1.44 per common share dividend paid in 2012, 66% was treated as a taxable dividend income and 34% was treated as a return of capital. No assurance can be given regarding what portion, if any, of distributions in 2015 or subsequent years will constitute a return of capital for federal income tax purposes. All of the preferred stock divi- dends paid are treated as ordinary dividend income. 2014 ANNUAL REPORT 59 MARKET INFORMATION Shares of Saul Centers common stock are listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “BFS”. The composite high and low closing sale prices for the Company’s shares of common stock were reported by the New York Stock Exchange for each quarter of 2014 and 2013 as follows: COMMON STOCK PRICES Period Share Price High Low October 1, 2014 – December 31, 2014 $ 58.56 $ 46.83 July 1, 2014 – September 30, 2014 $ 50.35 $ 45.98 April 1, 2014 – June 30, 2014 $ 50.53 $ 45.51 January 1, 2014 – March 31, 2014 $ 48.20 $ 45.06 October 1, 2013 – December 31, 2013 $ 49.19 $ 45.86 July 1, 2013 – September 30, 2013 $ 48.49 $ 43.10 April 1, 2013 – June 30, 2013 $ 47.83 $ 42.66 January 1, 2013– March 31, 2013 $ 44.94 $ 41.43 On March 3, 2015, the closing price was $54.64 per share The approximate number of holders of record of the common stock was 205 as of March 3, 2015. 60 SAUL CENTERS, INC. PERFORMANCE GRAPH Rules promulgated under the Exchange Act require the Company to present a graph comparing the cumulative total stockholder return on its Common Stock with the cumulative total stockholder return of (i) a broad equity market index, and (ii) a published industry index or peer group. The following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return of the Company’s common stock, based on the market price of the common stock and assuming reinvestment of dividends, with the National Association of Real Estate In- vestment Trust Equity Index (“NAREIT Equity”), the S&P 500 Index (“S&P 500”) and the Russell 2000 Index (“Russell 2000”). The graph assumes the investment of $100 on January 1, 2010. Comparison of Cumulative Total Return d e t s e v n I 0 0 1 $ n r u e R t l t a o T $250 $200 $150 $100 Jan. 1, 2010 Dec. 31, 2010 Dec. 31, 2011 Dec. 31, 2012 Dec. 31, 2013 Dec. 31, 2014 Jan. 1, 2010 Dec. 31, 2010 Dec. 31, 2011 Dec. 31, 2012 Dec. 31, 2013 Dec. 31, 2014 Saul Centers S&P 500 Russell 2000 $100 $100 $100 NAREIT Equity $100 $150 $115 $127 $128 $116 $117 $122 $139 $145 $136 $141 $164 $167 $180 $196 $168 $207 $205 $206 $218 2014 ANNUAL REPORT 61 SAUL CENTERS CORPORATE INFORMATION DIRECTORS EXECUTIVE OFFICERS B. Francis Saul II Chairman and Chief Executive Officer J. Page Lansdale President and Chief Operating Officer Christine N. Kearns Executive Vice President – Chief Legal and Administrative Officer Scott V. Schneider Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary Debra Stencel Senior Vice President and General Counsel Joel A. Friedman Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer Christopher H. Netter Senior Vice President, Retail Leasing Steven N. Corey Senior Vice President, Office Leasing John F. Collich Senior Vice President, Acquisitions and Development Donald A. Hachey Senior Vice President, Construction Charles W. Sherren, Jr. Senior Vice President, Management B. Francis Saul II Chairman and Chief Executive Officer J. Page Lansdale President and Chief Operating Officer Philip D. Caraci Vice Chairman The Honorable John E. Chapoton Partner, Brown Investment Advisory George P. Clancy, Jr. Executive Vice President, Emeritus Chevy Chase Bank Gilbert M. Grosvenor Chairman Emeritus of the Board of Trustees, National Geographic Society Philip C. Jackson, Jr. Adjunct Professor Emeritus, Birmingham-Southern College Charles R. Longsworth Chairman Emeritus, Colonial Williamsburg Foundation Patrick F. Noonan Founder/Chairman Emeritus, The Conservation Fund H. Gregory Platts Senior Vice President and Treasurer, Emeritus, National Geographic Society Andrew M. Saul II Chief Executive Officer Genovation Cars Mark Sullivan III Financial and Legal Consultant The Honorable James W. Symington Of Counsel, O’Connor and Hannan, Attorneys at Law John R. Whitmore Financial Consultant 62 SAUL CENTERS, INC. COUNSEL Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP Washington, DC 20037 INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM Ernst and Young LLP McLean, Virginia 22102 WEB SITE www.saulcenters.com EXCHANGE LISTING New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) Symbol: Common Stock: BFS Preferred Stock: BFS.PrC TRANSFER AGENT Continental Stock Transfer and Trust Company 17 Battery Place New York, NY 10004 (800) 509-5586 INVESTOR RELATIONS A copy of the Saul Centers, Inc. annual report to the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form 10-K, which includes as exhibits the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Certifications required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, may be printed from the Company’s web site or obtained at no cost to stockholders by writing to the address below or calling (301) 986-6016. In 2014, the Company filed with the NYSE the Certification of its Chief Executive Officer confirming that he was not aware of any violation by the Company of the NYSE’s corporate governance listing standards. HEADQUARTERS 7501 Wisconsin Ave. Suite 1500E Bethesda, MD 20814-6522 Phone: (301) 986-6200 Seven Corners, Falls Church, VA Annual Meeting of Stockholders The Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be held at 11:00 a.m., local time, on May 8, 2015, at the Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, Bethesda, MD (at the southwest corner of the Wisconsin Avenue and Old Georgetown Road intersection, adjacent to the Bethesda Metro Stop on the Metro Red Line.) 7501 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 1500E Bethesda, MD 20814-6522 Phone: (301) 986-6200 Website: www.saulcenters.com

Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above