Quarterlytics / Financial Services / Asset Management / Sculptor Capital Management

Sculptor Capital Management

scu · TSX Financial Services
Claim this profile
Ticker scu
Exchange TSX
Sector Financial Services
Industry Asset Management
Employees 51-200
← All annual reports
FY2013 Annual Report · Sculptor Capital Management
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
A
n
n
u
A
l
r
e
p
o
r
t
2
0
1
3

t
h
e
s
e
c
o
n
d
c
u
p
l
t
d

.

The Second Cup Ltd.    /   Annual Report 2013

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
contents
The Second Cup Ltd.  Annual Report 2013

Letter from the Chairman 

Letter from the President & CEO 

Financial Highlights 

Management’s Discussion And Analysis  

Audited Financial Statements 

Notes to the Financial Statements 

Shareholder Information  

05

09

13 

14

35

41

65

05

Letter from the  
chairman of  
the second cup Ltd.

Dear Shareholders,

Michael Bregman, Chairman

I am delighted to have re-associated with Second Cup as your Chairman.  I see great 

opportunity for Second Cup to restore its legacy of excellence in all aspects of the company.  

The challenges are formidable and will take time to successfully tackle.  I am very optimistic 

that we will succeed.

My prior relationship with Second Cup was very rewarding for shareholders and ended with 

a successful transaction twelve years ago.  The foundation of the company retains important 

qualities, including excellent locations, highly motivated franchisees and superb coffee quality.   

However, we acknowledge that the company’s leadership 

position has been tarnished in recent years.  While Canada’s 

specialty coffee industry has flourished, Second Cup has 

experienced declines in store count, same store sales, store 

level profitability and company profitability. This must change.

In 2013, the TASSIMO T DISC branded line of single-serve coffees grew to include five varieties — 
Paradiso®, Paradiso® Dark, Caff è Latte, Caramelo® and Espresso Forte.

 
At Second Cup, 100% of our coffees and teas are 
Rainforest Alliance Certified™ or Fairtrade Certified™.

Our ultimate objectives are lofty.  We aim to operate world class coffee stores.  As we 

progress, we will earn loyal patronage of more customers.  When more customers visit 

Second Cup, sales and profitability will rise at store level and corporately.  As success is 

achieved, there is potential for significant growth in shareholder value.

07 

We recognize that much change is needed to chart a new, more positive future direction 

for the company.  This could not occur without leadership change and there has been 

considerable change recently.  The board of directors was reconstituted in December with 

a new slate of directors.  There is strong alignment with major shareholders to support bold 

action to improve Second Cup’s performance.  To date, our most important move was 

recruiting Alix Box as our President and CEO.

Alix is uniquely qualified to lead Second Cup.  Throughout her career, she has been a 

successful leader of positive change with an uncompromising commitment to excellence.  She 

understands quality retailing and she knows coffee.  Alix is committed to build an organization 

dedicated to excellence with the goal of restoring strong growth in sales and profitability.  This 

will require time.  In the coming months, Alix will share her vision for Second Cup’s future.  

Our journey has begun and we are prepared for considerable change in the short term in our 

quest to build substantial and sustained long term value.

I thank you for the privilege of serving as your chair and we look 

forward to reporting on Second Cup’s progress.

Sincerely,

Michael Bregman
Chairman

  
09

Letter from the  
president & ceo of  
the second cup Ltd.

Dear Shareholders,

Alix Box, President & CEO

After a period away from the coffee business, I am thrilled to be leading Second Cup and 

energized by our ambitious objective of enhancing shareholder value by improving the 

profitability of both our franchisees and the company. I believe we can draw on the strong 

roots of this iconic brand and reinvigorate it to bring the best coffee experience to Canadians 

that is uniquely Second Cup. 

The company has experienced significant challenges over the last several periods and our 

performance has to fundamentally improve. We are therefore embarking on a period of 

significant change to transform Second Cup. Most importantly, we will be raising the bar 

Through its partnership with Kraft Canada Inc., Second Cup announced the launch of a line of 
premium whole bean and roast & ground coffees.

 
 
significantly as we set out to over deliver and thrill our customers, every cup, every day! This 

journey to take Second Cup to a much higher level of performance will take time.

11

In my first weeks in the role, I spent time meeting with our franchisees and with the Second 

Cup Franchisee Advisory Council. After listening and hearing from this passionate group, I 

am thoroughly convinced that our goals are both appropriate and entirely achievable. We are 

privileged to have such talented entrepreneurs who have a deep passion for Second Cup and 

are integral parts of the communities they serve. I am committed to re-establishing the trust 

and collaborative relationship with these partners that is fundamental to our success.

I have always believed that striving for excellence requires an unrelenting focus on both quality 

and all the elements of the customer experience. In our quest to drive stronger sales and 

profits and get our stores performing at higher levels, we will enhance our standards in all 

that we do including: leveraging our unrivalled coffee quality, introducing product innovations, 

pursuing operational excellence and unparalleled customer service, and developing a new 

world-class store of the future. We have begun the process of re-engineering Coffee Central, 

our renamed head office, so we can provide the highest possible level of service to our 

franchisees.

2014 will be a year of enormous change. I am encouraged by our team’s desire and 

excitement to rejuvenate Second Cup and thank our Board of Directors for their incredible 

support. I am committed to delivering long term growth for both our shareholders and 

franchisees and eager to lead our transformation. 

Sincerely,

Alix Box
President & CEO

 
 
 
The Second Cup Ltd.

 FInAncIAl hIGhlIGhts

(in thousands of Canadian dollars, except Number of cafés, Same café sales, and per share amounts)

13

System sales of cafés1 
Same café sales1 
Number of cafés - end of period 
Total revenue 
Gross profit 
Operating expenses 
Impairment charges 
Operating income (loss)1  

Adjusted EBITDA1 
Net income (loss) and comprehensive income (loss) 
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share as reported 
Adjusted basic and diluted earnings per share1 
Total Assets - end of period 
Number of common shares issued and  
    outstanding - end of period 

13 weeks  
ended 
December 
28, 2013 
$  51,898 
(4.3%) 
356 
8,038 
6,949 
4,759 
299 
1,891 

$ 

$ 

13 weeks 
ended 
December 
29, 2012 
$  53,515  
(4.2%) 
360  
7,785  
6,638  
3,9772  
15,6492 
(12,988)  

$ 

$ 

$ 

2,868 
1,177 
0.12 
0.17 
77,340 

$ 

3,027  
(12,024) 
(1.21) 
0.182 
88,680 

52 weeks 
ended 
December 
28, 2013 
$  191,434 
(3.6%) 
356 
$  27,188 
23,134 
16,704 
13,552 
(7,122) 

$ 

$ 

7,570 
(7,369) 
(0.74) 
0.45 
77,340 

52 weeks 
ended
December
29, 2012 

$  194,387

(1.9%) 
360
$  26,346
22,823
15,4172
15,6562
(8,250)      

$ 

$ 

8,643
(9,404)
(0.95) 
0.452 

88,680

  9,903,045 

  9,903,045 

  9,903,045 

  9,903,045            

1  See the section “Definitions and discussion on certain non-GAAP measures” for further analysis.
2  Comparative figures were subject to reclassification as discussed in note 2a of the Audited Financial Statements. The net impact of 

the reclassification was $nil to net loss and comprehensive loss and only impacted presentation within current liabilities.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
14

The Second Cup Ltd.

 MAnAGeMent’s dIscussIon  
 And AnAlYsIs

CAUTION REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) may constitute forward looking statements 
within  the  meaning  of  applicable  securities  legislation.  The  terms  the  “Company”,  “Second  Cup”,  “we”,  “us”,  or  “our” 
refer  to  The  Second  Cup  Ltd.  Forward  looking  statements  include  words  such  as  “may”,  “will”,  “should”,  “expect”, 
“anticipate”, “believe”, “plan”, “intend” and other similar words. These statements reflect current expectations regarding 
future events and financial performance and speak only as of the date of this MD&A. The MD&A should not be read as 
a guarantee of future performance or results and will not necessarily be an accurate indication of whether or not those 
results will be achieved. Forward looking statements are based on a number of assumptions and are subject to known 
and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are beyond Second Cup’s control that may cause 
Second Cup’s actual results, performance or achievements, or those of Second Cup cafés, or industry results to be 
materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking 
statements. The following are some of the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed 
in  the  underlying  forward  looking  statements:  competition;  availability  of  premium  quality  coffee  beans;  the  ability  to 
attract  qualified  franchise  partners;  the  location  of  Second  Cup  cafés;  the  closure  of  Second  Cup  cafés;  loss  of  key 
personnel; compliance with government regulations; potential litigation; the ability to exploit and protect the Second Cup 
trademarks; changing consumer preferences and discretionary spending patterns including, but not restricted to, the 
impact of weather and economic conditions on such patterns; reporting of system sales by franchise partners; and the 
financial performance and financial condition of Second Cup. The foregoing list of factors is not exhaustive, and investors 
should refer to the risks described under “Risks and Uncertainties” below and in Second Cup’s Annual Information Form, 
which is available at www.sedar.com. 

Although the forward looking statements contained in this MD&A are based on what management believes are reasonable 
assumptions, there can be no assurance that actual results will be consistent with these forward looking statements and, 
as a result, the forward-looking statements may prove to be incorrect.

As these forward looking statements are made as of the date of this MD&A, Second Cup does not undertake to update 
any  such  forward-looking  statements  whether  as  a  result  of  new  information,  future  events  or  otherwise.  Additional 
information about these assumptions and risks and uncertainties is contained in the Company’s filings with securities 
regulators. These filings are also available on the Company’s website at www.secondcup.com.

INTRODUCTION

The following MD&A has been prepared as of March 7, 2014 and is intended to assist in understanding the financial 
performance and financial condition of The Second Cup Ltd. (“Second Cup” or the “Company”) for the 13 weeks (the 
“Quarter”) and 52 weeks (the “Year”) ended December 28, 2013, and should be read in conjunction with the Audited 
Financial  Statements  of  the  Company,  accompanying  notes  and  the  Annual  Information  Form,  which  are  available  at 
www.sedar.com. Past performance may not be indicative of future performance. All amounts are presented in thousands 
of Canadian dollars, except number of cafés, per share amounts or unless otherwise indicated and have been prepared 
in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). The Company also reports certain non-IFRS 
measures such as System sales of cafés, Same café sales, EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, and Adjusted earnings per share 
that are discussed in the “Definitions and discussion of certain non-GAAP financial measures” in this MD&A.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS   15

 contents

CORE BUSINESS, STRATEGY,  
AND PERFORMANCE DRIVERS

CAPABILITIES 

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS 

OPERATIONAL REVIEW 

SELECTED QUARTERLY  
INFORMATION

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL  
RESOURCES

15 

16

19

19

23

24

EVALUATION OF  
DISCLOSURE CONTROLS  
AND PROCEDURES 

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING  
ESTIMATES

RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES 

OUTLOOK 

DEFINITIONS AND  
DISCUSSION ON CERTAIN 
NON-GAAP FINANCIAL 
MEASURES

27

28

29

31

31

CORE BUSINESS, STRATEGY, AND PERFORMANCE DRIVERS

Core business 
Second Cup is Canada’s largest specialty coffee café franchisor (as measured by the number of cafés) with 356 
cafés operating under the trade name Second Cup™ in Canada, of which ten are Company-operated and the 
balance are operated by franchise partners who are selected and trained to retail Second Cup’s product offering.

Second  Cup  owns  the  trademarks,  trade  names,  operating  procedures  and  systems  and  other  intellectual 
property used in connection with the operation of Second Cup cafés only in Canada, excluding the Territory  
of Nunavut. 

Second  Cup  was  incorporated  under  the  Business  Corporations  Act  (Ontario)  in  2011.  The  address  of  its 
registered office is 6303 Airport Road, 2nd Floor, Mississauga, Ontario, L4V 1R8. The Company’s website is 
www.secondcup.com. The common shares of the Company are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange under 
the symbol “SCU”.

Second Cup’s fiscal year follows the method implemented by many retail entities, such that each quarter will 
consist of 13 weeks and will end on the Saturday closest to the calendar quarter-end. The fiscal year is made up 
of 52 or 53 week periods ending on the last Saturday of December.

As  at  March  7,  2014,  the  Company’s  issued  share  capital  consisted  of  9,903,045  common  shares  and  was 
unchanged from the previous Year.

Additional information relating to the Company, including the Company’s Annual Information Form, is on SEDAR at  
www.sedar.com.

As a franchisor, Second Cup opens, acquires, closes and refranchises individual café locations in the normal course  
of business.

The Second Cup Ltd. Annual Report 2013              
16

Strategic imperatives and key performance drivers
The Company’s strategic vision is to be Canada’s favourite coffee house. The strategic focus is supported with integrated 
imperatives that are geared towards future growth. Key objectives are: 
• improve franchise partner profitability by growth in café sales and margin enhancements; 
• growing and improving our café network; 
• new channel development which would build our brand within and outside of cafés; and 
• innovation of product offerings.

A summary of the three strategic imperatives targeted to fulfil growth objectives that commenced in 2012 are outlined  
as follows:

(i) Development and deployment of a loyalty program
The Company launched the loyalty program pilot in 31 cafés in the Calgary region in June 2013. The pilot program helped 
facilitate key learnings and consideration points with respect to a planned national launch in 2014. The goal of the loyalty 
program is to reward our loyal customers and attract incremental traffic from new and existing customers. Initial pilot 
results are promising and helped support the business case to continue to develop and launch the loyalty program on a 
national basis.

(ii) Distribution of Second Cup coffee in grocery stores and other retail channels
The  Company  has  partnered  with  Kraft  Canada  Inc.  to  distribute  three  whole  bean  and  three  roast  &  ground  coffee 
offerings  in  grocery  stores  across  Canada.  The  product  was  made  available  on  store  shelves  in  certain  locations  in 
February 2014. This launch will offer customers more ways to enjoy the quality and variety of coffee from Second Cup. 
Expansion into the grocery channel broadens Second Cup’s brand by reaching guests in markets that might not have a 
Second Cup café nearby and better serves current Second Cup guests in-home. The increased accessibility of Second 
Cup products also enhances brand awareness to encourage guests to seek and experience the Second Cup product 
at a café. The launch will introduce a new revenue stream for the Company and builds on Second Cup’s success in 
on-demand, single-serve coffee in the grocery channel on the TASSIMO system.

(iii) Launch and continuing development of a new look café design
In July 2013, the Company completed a renovation and launched a new look café at one of its Company-operated cafés 
in downtown Toronto. The new look is designed to put the Company’s broad selection of brewed coffee at the forefront 
and to enhance the guest experience. Elements of the new café design are being incorporated across the Company’s 
store network as cafés are opened or renovated. Management will continue to review aspects of the design and work 
towards further deployment and refinement going forward. 

Change in Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer
The  Company  announced  on  December  20,  2013  the  reconstitution  of  the  Board  of  Directors.  The  new  Board  is 
compromised of Michael Bregman (Chairman), Stephen Kelley, Alton McEwen, Rael Merson, and Alan Simpson.

On  February  24,  2014,  Alix  Box  commenced  her  duties  as  President  and  Chief  Executive  Officer.  Ms.  Box  was  also 
appointed as a director of the Company.

CAPABILITIES

This section documents factors that affect the Company’s capabilities to execute strategies, manage key performance 
drivers and deliver results. This section is qualified by the section “Caution Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” at 
the beginning of this MD&A. 

The Second Cup brand
The Company has a well-established and recognizable national brand. A proudly Canadian company since 1975 with 
356  cafés  across  Canada,  Second  Cup  is  Canada’s  largest  specialty  coffee  franchisor.  The  Company  maintains  its 

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS    
17

commitment to the communities it operates in, and thus we celebrate our franchise partners’ local ownership and focus 
on providing quality and friendly service to each guest that walks into our cafés.

Our people
The Company’s franchise network consists of approximately 4,000 team members. Team members range from baristas, 
managers, and franchise partners at the cafés, and support personnel employed at the head office. Baristas and franchise 
partners complete extensive training and certification to deliver a quality product to our customers. Franchise partners 
and baristas are subject to operational quality checks to monitor performance.

Product
The Company has a strategic partnership with its independent roaster of coffees. The Company has also partnered with 
Swiss Water Decaffeinated Coffee Company Inc. to decaffeinate its coffee. The process is 100% chemical-free, unlike 
other decaffeination methods that use methylene chloride or ethyl acetate to remove the caffeine. The decaffeination 
process  gently  removes  99.9%  of  the  caffeine  while  maintaining  the  unique  taste  characteristics  of  the  coffee.  The 
process emphasizes the Company’s commitment to natural and healthy products.

The Company’s coffee portfolio includes over 25 types of coffee, including a number of single origin estate coffees and a 
variety of blends exclusive to Second Cup, such as Paradiso, Espresso Forte and Second Cup’s Holiday Blend. Second 
Cup also offers a wide variety of espresso-based beverages and blender drinks such as espressos, cappuccinos, lattes 
and iced coffees, and is continually developing variations of these products. Examples of innovative espresso-based 
beverages  and  blender  drinks  developed  by  Second  Cup  include  the  Caramel  Corretto®,  Chillatte®,  Frrrozen  Hot 
Chocolate® and Icepresso Chiller®. The Company has Canadian exclusivity to distribute Costa Rican sourced La Minita 
Tarrazú coffee beans, which is considered one of the most highly sought-after coffees in the world.

Second Cup prides itself that 80% of the coffee portfolio, 100% of its espresso beverages, and 100% of its silk sachet tea 
collection are certified by third parties such as Rainforest Alliance Certified™ as environmentally sustainable products. 
The Company offers a fair-trade and organic certified blend of coffee entitled Cuzco®.

In addition to coffee-based products and other beverages, our cafés carry a variety of complementary products, including 
pastries, sandwiches, muffins, cookies, coffee accessories and coffee-related gift items.

Liquidity, capital resources and management of capital
The Company’s objectives relating to the management of its capital structure are to:
• safeguard its ability to continue as a going concern;
• maintain financial flexibility in order to preserve its ability to meet financial obligations;
• maintain a capital structure that provides financing options to the Company when the need arises to access capital;
• ensure it has sufficient cash and cash equivalents to pay declared dividends to its shareholders; and
• deploy capital to provide an adequate return to its shareholders.

The Company’s primary uses of capital are to finance increases in non-cash working capital and capital expenditures. 
The Company determines the appropriate level of long-term debt in the context of its cash flows and overall business 
risks. The Company has historically generated sufficient cash flows to pay quarterly dividends to its shareholders. In order 
to maintain or modify the capital structure, Second Cup may adjust the amount of dividends paid to its shareholders.

On September 26, 2013, the Company renegotiated its term loan and operating credit facilities, including an extension of 
the maturity of the credit facilities to September 30, 2016. The revised credit facilities are comprised of an $11,000 non-
revolving term credit facility, fully drawn, and an undrawn $2,000 revolving operating credit facility. The term credit facilities 
are collateralized by substantially all the assets of the Company.

Pursuant to the terms of the Company’s operating credit facility and term loan, the Company is subject to certain financial 
and other customary covenants. 

The Second Cup Ltd. Annual Report 201318

The Company has requirements to maintain:
• a ratio of senior debt to EBITDA ratio (“Leverage Ratio”); 
•  a fixed charge coverage ratio;  

both of which are based on a trailing four-quarter basis; and 

•  a maximum amount of permitted distributions and purchases of the Company’s own stock based on a trailing cumulative 

EBITDA, plus a carry-forward legacy surplus of permitted distributions. 

During the periods ended December 28, 2013 and December 29, 2012, the Company was in compliance with all financial 
and other covenants of the Company’s operating credit facility and term loan. 

The $11,000 non-revolving term credit facility bears interest at the bankers’ acceptance (“BA”) rate plus a margin range 
of  2.25%  to  3.25%  depending  on  the  Company’s  Leverage  Ratio.  As  at  December  28,  2013,  the  applicable  margin 
pertaining to the aforementioned range is 2.75%. As at December 28, 2013, the full amount of the $11,000 non-revolving 
term credit facility was drawn.

The  $2,000  operating  credit  facility  bears  interest  at  the  BA  rate  plus  a  range  of  2.25%  to  3.25%  depending  on  the 
Company’s Leverage Ratio. As at December 28, 2013, the applicable margin pertaining to the aforementioned range is 
2.75%. As at December 28, 2013, no advances had been drawn on this facility.

The Company had an interest rate swap agreement with a notional value of $11,000 that expired on April 1, 2013, which 
fixed the interest rate on the Company’s non-revolving term credit facility at 3.04% per annum plus the margin noted 
above, which resulted in a fixed effective interest rate of 5.79%.

On September 30, 2013, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement with a notional value of $11,000 that 
expires on September 30, 2016. The swap fixed the interest rate on the Company’s non-revolving term credit facility at 
2.07% per annum plus the margin noted above, which resulted in a fixed effective interest rate of 4.82%.

Competition 
The  Canadian  specialty  coffee  market  is  highly  competitive  and  highly  fragmented,  with  few  barriers  to  entry.  There 
are  national,  regional,  and  local  coffee  retailers  whom  are  speciality  coffee  providers  or  quick  serve  restaurants  with  
broad menus.

Technology
Second  Cup  relies  heavily  on  information  technology  network  infrastructure  including  point  of  sales  system  (“POS”) 
hardware and software in cafés, Second Cup gift and loyalty card transactions, and head office financial and administrative 
functions. The Company’s ability to manage operations effectively and efficiently depends on the reliability and capacity 
of these technology systems, most of which are administered by third party suppliers. The Company has made significant 
investments in POS systems across its store network as it relies on the POS system to help analysis for both marketing 
initiatives and royalty calculations.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS    
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

19

The following table sets out selected IFRS and certain non-GAAP financial measures of the Company and should be 
read in conjunction with the Audited Financial Statements of the Company for the 52 weeks ended December 28, 2013. 

(in thousands of Canadian dollars, 
except Number of cafés, Same café sales,  
and per share amounts) 
System sales of cafés1 
Same café sales1 
Number of cafés - end of period 
Total revenue 
Gross profit 
Operating expenses 
Impairment charges 
Operating income (loss)1  

Adjusted EBITDA1 
Net income (loss) and comprehensive income (loss) 
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share as reported 
Adjusted basic and diluted earnings per share1 
Total Assets - end of period 
Number of common shares issued and  
    outstanding - end of period 

13 weeks  
ended 
December 
28, 2013 
$  51,898 
(4.3%) 
356 
8,038 
6,949 
4,759 
299 
1,891 

$ 

$ 

13 weeks 
ended 
December 
29, 2012 
$  53,515  
(4.2%) 
360  
7,785  
6,638  
3,9772  
15,6492 
(12,988)  

$ 

$ 

$ 

2,868 
1,177 
0.12 
0.17 
77,340 

$ 

3,027  
(12,024) 
(1.21) 
0.182 
88,680 

52 weeks 
ended 
December 
28, 2013 
$  191,434 
(3.6%) 
356 
$  27,188 
23,134 
16,704 
13,552 
(7,122) 

$ 

$ 

7,570 
(7,369) 
(0.74) 
0.45 
77,340 

52 weeks 
ended
December
29, 2012 

$  194,387

(1.9%) 
360
$  26,346
22,823
15,4172
15,6562
(8,250)      

$ 

$ 

8,643
(9,404)
(0.95) 
0.452 

88,680

  9,903,045 

  9,903,045 

  9,903,045 

  9,903,045            

1  See the section “Definitions and discussion on certain non-GAAP measures” for further analysis.
2  Comparative figures were subject to reclassification as discussed in note 2a of the Audited Financial Statements. The net impact of 

the reclassification was $nil to net loss and comprehensive loss and only impacted presentation within current liabilities.

OPERATIONAL REVIEW

Seasonality of System sales of cafés
The following table shows the percentage of annual System sales of cafés achieved, on average, in each fiscal reporting 
quarter over the last three Years:

% of annual System sales of cafés 
First quarter  
Second quarter  
Third quarter  
Fourth quarter  

2011 
23.5 
24.4 
24.0 
28.1 
100.0 

2012 
24.2 
24.4 
23.9 
27.5 
100.0 

2013 
24.5 
24.9 
23.5 
27.1 
100.0 

Average 
24.1
24.5
23.8
27.6     
100.0      

Historically, System sales of cafés have been higher in the fourth quarter, which includes the holiday sales periods of 
November and December. Because of this seasonality, the results for any Quarter are not necessarily indicative of what 
may be achieved for any other Quarter or Year.

The Second Cup Ltd. Annual Report 2013 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
20

Café network

Number of cafés - beginning of period  
Cafés opened  
Cafés closed  
Number of cafés - end of period  
Number of cafés renovated  

13 weeks  
ended 
December 
28, 2013 
351 
6 
(1) 
356 
3 

13 weeks 
ended 
December 
29, 2012 
358 
4 
(2) 
360 
4 

52 weeks 
ended 
December 
28, 2013 
360 
15 
(19) 
356 
22 

52 weeks 
ended
December

29, 2012        

359
18
(17)     
360        
19        

Closure activity in 2013 was predominantly driven by the planned closures of eight low volume cafés located inside home 
improvement retail centres. The Company ended the Year with ten (2012 - ten) Company-operated cafés.

Fourth Quarter

System sales of cafés
System sales of cafés for the 13 weeks ended December 28, 2013 were $51,898 compared to $53,515 for the 13 weeks 
ended December 29, 2012, representing a decrease of $1,617 or 3.0%. The decrease is attributable to decreased Same 
café sales and to the marginally smaller store network.

Same café sales
During the Quarter, Second Cup continued to be impacted by competitive activity resulting in a same café sales decline 
of 4.3%, compared to a decline of 4.2% in the comparable Quarter of 2012.

Analysis of revenue
Total revenue for the Quarter was $8,038 (2012 - $7,785) and consisted of royalty revenue, revenue from sale of goods, 
and services revenue. 

Royalty revenue for the Quarter was $3,816 (2012 - $4,017). The reduction in royalty revenue of $201 is primarily a result 
of overall lower System sales of cafés, and to a lesser extent, the mix of cafés with varying royalty rates. 

Revenue from the sale of goods, which consists of revenue from Company-operated cafés and from the e-commerce 
channel was $1,526 (2012 - $1,597) for the Quarter. The decrease of $71 in revenue from the sale of goods was mainly 
due lower customer traffic across the Company-operated café portfolio and changes within the portfolio of cafés. There 
were ten Company-operated cafés at the end of both Years.

Services revenue for the Quarter was $2,696 (2012 - $2,171). Services revenue includes initial franchise fees, renewal fees, 
transfer fees earned on the sale of cafés from one franchise partner to another, construction administration fees, product 
licencing revenue, wholesale revenue, purchasing coordination fees, and other ancillary fees (such as IT support and 
training fees). The $525 increase in services revenue was primarily due to sales pertaining to the partnership with Kraft 
Canada Inc. to produce, market, and sell Second Cup branded TASSIMO T-Discs. 

Cost of goods sold
Cost of goods sold represents the product cost of goods sold in Company-operated cafés and through the e-commerce 
channel, plus the cost of direct labour to prepare and deliver the goods to the customers in the Company-operated cafés. 
Cost of goods sold was $1,089 (2012 - $1,147) or alternatively as a percentage of revenue from the sale of goods was 71% 
(2012 - 72%). The improvement is due to menu price increases at cafés and decreases pertaining to product purchase 
costs as a result of improved vendor pricing.

Operating expenses
Operating expenses include the head office expenses of Second Cup and the overhead expenses of Company-operated 
cafés. Total operating expenses for the Quarter were $4,759 (2012 - $3,970), an increase of $782. 

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS    
 
 
 
21

Head office 
Head office expenses for the Quarter were $4,406 (2012 - $3,424), an increase of $982 or 29%. During the Quarter, the 
Company recorded $883 of restructuring charges pertaining to the reconstitution of the Board of Directors and change 
in Chief Executive Officer. The Company also recorded bad debt expense of $265 in the Quarter. Offsetting impacts 
included  lower  salaries,  wages,  benefits,  and  incentives  coupled  with  a  gain  of  $372  relating  to  breakage  income  on  
gift cards.

Company-operated cafés 
Company-operated café expenses for the Quarter were $353 (2012 - $546), a decrease of $193 or 35%. The decrease is 
due to gains on disposal of capital related items as a result of required software upgrades in advance of the anticipated 
launch of the loyalty program. 

Impairment charges
The  Company  recognized  impairment  charges  of  $299  (2012  -  $15,649).  The  2013  charge  pertained  to  leasehold 
improvement  assets  carried  at  a  value  in  excess  of  its  recoverable  amount  that  cannot  be  redeployed  to  another 
Company-operated café.

The 2012 charges of $15,649 were a result of the Company’s annual impairment analysis, which consisted of $12,850 to 
trademarks, $2,444 to goodwill, and $355 to other assets.

Interest and financing
The Company incurred interest and financing expenses of $254 (2012 - $128). The swap agreement expired on April 1, 
2013 and was subsequently renewed during the Quarter on September 30, 2013. The increase in interest and financing 
expenses  is  due  to  the  fair  value  adjustment  primarily  realized  at  inception  of  the  renewed  swap  which  captures  an 
interest rate premium to fix the effective interest rate on the Long-term debt. Details are discussed in the “Liquidity and 
capital resources” section onward in the MD&A.

Income taxes (recovery)
Current income taxes of $427 (2012 - $596) and deferred income tax expense of $33 (2012 - tax recovery of $1,688) 
were recorded in the Quarter. Current income taxes decreased as a result of decreased royalties. The change in deferred 
income taxes was driven by the impairment charges recorded in 2012.

Adjusted EBITDA
Adjusted EBITDA for the Quarter was $2,868 (2012 - $3,027). The decrease of $159 in Adjusted EBITDA was primarily 
due to decreased royalty revenue.

Net income (loss)
The Company’s net income for the Quarter was $1,177 or $0.12 per share, compared to a loss of $12,024 or $1.21 per 
share in 2012. The increase in net income of $13,201 or $1.33 per share was mainly due to the non-cash impairment 
charge that was recorded in the prior Year.

A reconciliation of net income (loss) to Adjusted EBITDA is provided in the section “Definitions and discussion of certain 
non-GAAP financial measures”. 

Year

System sales of cafés
System sales of cafés for the Year were $191,434 compared to $194,387 for 2012, representing a decrease of $2,953  
or 1.5%. The decrease is attributable to lower same café sales and to the marginally smaller store network.

Same café sales
For the Year, there was a decline of 3.6% compared to a decline of 1.9% in the comparable Year of 2012. The nature of 
the decrease is consistent to what was discussed above in the Quarter.

The Second Cup Ltd. Annual Report 201322

Analysis of revenue
Total revenues for the Year were $27,188 (2012 - $26,346). 

Royalty revenue for the Year was $14,117 (2012 - $14,927). The reduction in royalty revenue of $810 was mainly a result 
of overall lower system sales of cafés and the reduction in the effective royalty rate from 7.9% in 2012 to 7.6% in the Year. 
This change was consistent with what was discussed above pertaining to the Quarter. 

Revenue from the sale of goods, which consists of revenue from Company-operated cafés and the e-commerce channel 
was $5,506 (2012 - $4,698) for the Year. The increase in revenue from the sale of goods was mainly due to a range of ten 
to eleven Company-operated cafés compared to a 2012 range of seven to ten Company-operated cafés. 

Services revenue for the Year was $7,565 (2012 - $6,721). The $844 increase in services revenue was primarily due to the 
full year impact of the partnership with Kraft Canada Inc. to produce, market, and sell Second Cup TASSIMO T-Discs. 
Sales of TASSIMO T-Discs commenced in the third Quarter of 2012, hence the 2013 Year benefitted from having a full 
period of sales.

Cost of goods sold
Cost of goods sold was $4,054 (2012 - $3,523) or alternatively as a percentage of revenue from the sale of goods was 
74% (2012 - 75%). The improvement was discussed above in the Quarter.

Operating expenses
Total operating expenses for the Year were $16,704 (2012 - $15,417), an increase of $1,287. 

Head office 
Head office expenses increased by $1,191 (9%) in the Year to $14,943 from $13,752 in 2012. The Company incurred 
$883 in restructuring charges as discussed above in the Quarter. The increase was also driven by adjustments to closed 
café lease provisions and increases in other onerous lease related provisions where the Company is on the headlease. 
The increase also pertains to expenditures on innovation, test concepts, and initiatives mostly due to costs towards the 
loyalty program and new café branding and design costs. Offsetting some of the increase was a gain of $797 relating to 
breakage income on gift cards recorded in the Year.

Company-operated cafés 
The overhead expenses in Company-operated cafés for the Year increased by $96 to $1,761 from $1,665 in 2012. The 
increase is due to a larger number of Company-operated cafés offset partially by a gain on disposal of capital related 
items, both of which were discussed above in the Quarter.

Impairment charges
The Company incurred impairment charges of $13,552 (2012 - $15,656). During the second Quarter of 2013, the Company 
identified impairment indicators on its trademark assets, which were primarily a result of the decline in its stock price 
and a decline in sales in comparison to internal projections. The impairment test is based on the expected recoverable 
amount of the cash generating unit which has been determined using fair value less costs to sell. The determination of 
the recoverable amount incorporates an element of risk in meeting those expectations. As a result of the impairment test, 
the Company recognized an impairment charge of $13,253 in the Year pertaining to trademarks. The after-tax impact of 
this impairment charge was $11,497 and reduced earnings per share by $1.16. The impairment charge had no impact on 
the Company’s liquidity, cash flow, borrowing capability or operations.

Further impairment charges are discussed above in the Quarter.

Interest and financing
The Company incurred interest and financing expenses of $516 (2012 - $503). The increase in interest and financing 
expenses  was  discussed  above  in  the  Quarter.  Offsetting  the  increases  were  recoveries  pertaining  to  higher  interest 
income as a result of higher cash balances. Further recoveries were a result of a lower fixed effective interest rate of 4.82% 
vs. 5.79% under the previous interest rate swap that ended on April 30, 2013. Details are discussed in the “Liquidity and 
capital resources” section onward in the MD&A.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS   23

Income taxes (recovery)
Current income taxes of $1,503 (2012 - $1,644) and deferred income tax recoveries of $1,772 (2012 - $993) were recorded 
in the Year. The decline in current taxes is consistent with the discussion above in the Quarter. The income tax recoveries 
pertaining to deferred income taxes were driven by the impairment charges discussed above.

Adjusted EBITDA
Adjusted EBITDA for the Year was $7,570 (2012 - $8,643). The Adjusted EBITDA decrease of $1,073 was primarily due 
to an increase in operating expenses before restructuring charges, the change in estimate pertaining to the gift card 
breakage rate, and a decrease in royalty revenue as discussed above. 

Net loss 
The Company’s net loss for the Year was $7,369 or $0.74 loss per share, compared to net loss of $9,404 or $0.95 loss per 
share in 2012. The improvement of net loss of $2,035 or $0.20 per share was mainly due to lower non-cash impairment 
charges in the current Year. 

Dividend
On March 7, 2014 the Board of Directors of Second Cup approved a quarterly dividend of $0.085 per common share, 
payable on March 28, 2014 to shareholders of record at the close of business on March 21, 2014. 

The  Company’s  dividend  policy  is  to  continue  to  pay  a  portion  of  earnings  while  retaining  funds  for  organic  growth 
initiatives. The determination to declare and make payable dividends from Second Cup is at the discretion of the Board 
of  Directors  of  Second  Cup  and  until  declared  payable,  Second  Cup  has  no  requirement  to  pay  cash  dividends  to 
shareholders. Taking into account current economic conditions and their impact on the profitability of Second Cup, the 
Board of Directors will continually review the level of dividends paid by the Company and there can be no assurance the 
dividends will remain at the current level.

SELECTED QUARTERLY INFORMATION

(in thousands of Canadian dollars, except Number of cafés,
Same café sales, and per share amounts) 
System sales of cafés1  
Same café sales1 
Number of cafés - end of period 
Total revenue 
Operating income (loss)1  
Adjusted EBITDA1 
Net income (loss) for the period 
Basic/diluted earnings (loss) per share  
Dividends declared per share 

System sales of cafés1  
Same café sales1 
Number of cafés - end of period 
Total revenue 
Operating (loss) income1  
Adjusted EBITDA1  
Net (loss) income for the period 
Basic/diluted (loss) earnings per share  
Dividends declared per share 

Q4 20132 
51,898 
(4.3%) 
356 
8,038 
1,891 
2,868 
1,177 
0.12 
0.085 

Q4 20122 
53,515 
(4.2%) 
360 
7,785 
(12,988) 
3,027 
(12,024) 
(1.21) 
0.085 

Q3 2013 
44,894 
(3.7%) 
351 
6,268 
1,361 
1,2463 
918 
0.09 
0.085 

Q3 2012 
46,389 
(2.8%) 
358 
6,378 
1,133 
1,468 
746 
0.08 
0.15 

Q2 2013  
47,688 
(2.2%) 
362 
6,636 
(11,401) 
2,122 
(10,152) 
(1.03) 
0.085 

Q2 2012 
47,382 
(1.5%) 
356 
6,175 
2,063 
2,334 
842 
0.09 
0.15 

Q1 2013   
46,954
(3.3%)
361
6,246
1,027
1,334
688
0.07
0.085          

Q1 2012         
47,101
0.4%
355
6,008
1,542
1,814
1,032
0.10
0.15           

1  See the section “Definitions and discussion on certain non-GAAP financial measures” for further analysis.
2  The  Company’s  fourth  quarter  System  sales  of  cafés  are  higher  than  other  quarters  due  to  the  seasonality  of  the  business  (see 

“Seasonality of system sales of cafés” above).

3  The Company amended its definition of Adjusted EBITDA as discussed in the section “Definitions and discussion on certain non-
GAAP financial measures” to include changes in the estimate pertaining to the gift card breakage rate. Comparative amounts were 
amended in order to provide adequate comparative figures.

The Second Cup Ltd. Annual Report 2013 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
24

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Second Cup collects royalties based on the franchise partner portion of System sales of cafés, franchise fees, and other 
amounts from its franchise partners and also generates revenues from its Company-operated cafés. The performance 
of Second Cup franchise partners and Company-operated cafés could impact the ability of the Company to declare and 
pay dividends to its shareholders. For a more detailed discussion of the risks and uncertainties affecting the Company’s 
liquidity, see the “Risks and uncertainties” section below.

Summary of cash flows

Cash flows provided by operating activities 
Cash flows used by investing activities 
Cash flows used by financing activities 
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash  
    equivalents during the period 

Fourth Quarter

13 weeks  
ended 
December 
28, 2013 
2,765 
(744) 
(842) 

$ 

13 weeks 
ended 
December 
29, 2012 
1,765 
(221) 
(844) 

$ 

52 weeks 
ended 
December 
28, 2013 
7,678 
(1,661) 
(3,396) 

$ 

52 weeks 
ended
December

$ 

29, 2012        
5,150
(1,367)
(5,368)   

$ 

1,179 

$ 

700 

$ 

2,621 

$ 

(1,585)    

Cash generated by operating activities was $2,765 for the Quarter compared to $1,765 for the same Quarter in 2012. The 
difference is attributable to changes in non-cash working capital as a result of recorded breakage income and increases 
in provisions as a result of restructuring charges. Offsetting the increase were lower royalty revenues. 

During the Quarter, cash used in investing activities was $744 compared to cash used of $221 for the same Quarter in 
2012. The cash usage was a result of purchases in software pertaining to the POS system upgrade that commenced  
in the Quarter.

Financing activities resulted in a cash usage of $842 (2012 - $844) and thus was relatively stable. 

Year

Cash generated by operating activities was $7,678 for the Year compared to $5,150 for the same period last year. The 
difference was due to items discussed above in the Quarter. 

During the Year, cash used in investing activities was $1,661 compared to cash used of $1,367 for the same period in 
2012. The Company purchased $2,117 (2012 - $1,758) of property and equipment primarily for the acquisition of three 
Company-operated cafés in 2013, new look café renovations, equipment for other corporate cafés, head office and the 
POS system, and $787 (2012 - $180) towards software primarily for POS system upgrades that are a prerequisite to the 
launch of a loyalty program. The Company received proceeds of $1,240 (2012 - $350) on the disposal of property and 
equipment related to the sale of two corporate cafés to franchise partners and where the Company obtained proceeds 
upon returning related POS software licenses. Other cash received from investing activities was $3 (2012 - $185).

Financing activities resulted in a cash usage of $3,396 (2012 - $5,368) predominantly for dividends of $3,367 paid to 
shareholders. The dividends were reduced during the fourth quarter of 2012 to re-invest in long-term strategic growth 
initiatives such as the loyalty program and the new café design as discussed above.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS    
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Working capital as at

Current assets 
Current liabilities 
Working capital (deficiency) 

25

Dec. 28, 2013 
$  11,402 
  11,061 
341 
$ 

Dec. 29, 2012            

$ 

$ 

9,593
10,649             
(1,056)        

The Company’s working capital of $341 as of December 28, 2013, improved by $1,397 from December 29, 2012. Current 
liabilities include a $3,895 (December 29, 2012 - $4,560) gift card liability. The change in working capital was a result 
of a higher cash balance (discussed below) and a reduction of the gift card liability due to breakage (discussed above).

The  Company  had  cash  and  cash  equivalents  of  $6,501  at  December  28,  2013  (December  29,  2012  -  $3,880).  The 
increase was primarily due to the reduced dividends (discussed above). The Company continues to believe it has sufficient 
financial resources to pay operating expenses and future dividends when approved, declared, and due.

Financial instruments
The following summarizes the nature of certain risks applicable to the Company’s financial instruments:

Financial instrument 

Risks 

Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents 
Trade and other receivables 
Notes and leases receivable 

Financial liabilities
Interest rate swap 
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 
Gift card liability 
Deposits from franchise partners 
Term loan  

Credit and interest rate
Credit
Credit

Credit, liquidity, and interest rate
Liquidity, currency, and commodity
Liquidity
Liquidity
Liquidity and interest rate

(i) Credit risk
Cash and cash equivalents, and interest rate swap
Credit risk associated with cash and cash equivalents, and the interest rate swap is managed by ensuring these assets 
are placed with institutions of high creditworthiness. 

Trade and other receivables, and notes and leases receivable
The  Company’s  trade  and  other  receivables,  and  notes  and  lease  receivable  primarily  comprise  amounts  due  from 
franchise  partners.  Credit  risk  associated  with  these  receivables  is  mitigated  as  a  result  of  the  review  and  evaluation 
of  franchise  partner  account  balances  beyond  a  particular  age.  Prior  to  accepting  a  franchise  partner,  the  Company 
undertakes a detailed screening process which includes the requirement that a franchise partner has sufficient financing. 
The risk is further mitigated due to a broad franchise partner base that is spread across the country which limits the 
concentration of credit risk.

Other  receivables  may  include  amounts  owing  from  large  organizations  where  often  those  organizations  have  a 
simultaneous  vendor  relationship  with  the  Company’s  franchise  partners.  Credit  risk  is  mitigated  as  a  result  of  the 
Company directing and maintaining certain controls over the vendor relationship with the franchise partners.

(ii) Liquidity risk
The Company manages liquidity risk through regular monitoring of dividends, forecast and actual cash flows, monitoring 
maturity dates of financial assets and liabilities, and also the management of its capital structure and debt leverage ratios 
as outlined above. The Company’s main source of income is royalty receipts from its franchise partners.

The Second Cup Ltd. Annual Report 2013 
 
 
26

(iii) Interest rate risk
The Company’s financial instruments exposed to interest rate risk earn and bear interest at floating rates. The Company 
entered into an interest rate swap agreement to minimize risk on its long-term debt.

(iv) Currency risk
The Company transacts with a small number of vendors that operate in foreign currencies. The Company believes that 
due to low volumes of transactions, low number of vendors, and low magnitude of spend, the impact of currency risk is 
not material.

The Company is in the process of evaluating future currency risk and its ability to mitigate this risk with respect to a key 
vendor involved in the anticipated national launch of a loyalty program.

(v) Commodity risk
The  Company  is  directly  and  indirectly  exposed  to  commodity  market  risk.  The  exposure  relates  to  the  changes  in 
coffee commodity prices given it is a material input for the Company’s product offerings. The direct risk pertaining to 
Company-operated  cafés  is  not  considered  material  given  that  there  is  a  relatively  small  number  of  cafés.  The  direct 
exposure pertaining to the wholesale business is mitigated given that the Company has the ability to adjust its sales 
price if commodity prices rise over a threshold level. The indirect risk exists where franchise partner profitability may be 
impacted, thus potentially resulting in an impeded ability to collect accounts receivable or the need for other concessions 
to be made to the franchise partner. The Company mitigates this risk by entering fixed price purchase commitments 
through coffee commodity brokers and by having the ability to adjust retail selling prices.

Contingencies, commitments and guarantees 
Discussion of commitments as at December 28, 2013 are as follows:

Second Cup has lease commitments for Company-operated cafés and also acts as the head tenant on leases, which it 
in turn subleases to franchise partners. 

December 28, 2014 
December 28, 2015 
December 28, 2016 
December 28, 2017 
December 28, 2018 
Thereafter 

$ 

Headlease commitments 
19,627 
18,328 
16,254 
14,222 
12,159 
32,694 
$  113,284 

Sublease to franchisees 
$  18,144 
17,004 
15,033 
13,030 
11,076 
29,142 
$  103,429 

Net 
$  1,483
1,324
1,221
1,192
1,083
3,552     
$  9,855    

The Company believes it will have sufficient resources to meet the net commitment of $9,855.

Second Cup is involved in litigation and other claims arising in the normal course of business. Management must use 
its  judgement  to  determine  whether  or  not  a  claim  has  any  merit,  the  amount  of  the  claim  and  whether  to  record  a 
provision, which is dependent on the potential success of the claim. Second Cup believes it will not incur any significant 
loss or expense with such claims. However, there can be no assurance that unforeseen circumstances will not result in 
significant costs. The outcome of these actions is not determinable at this time, and adjustments, if any, will be recorded 
in the period of settlement.

The Coffee “C” contract is the world benchmark for Arabica coffee. The contract prices physical delivery of exchange 
grade green beans from one of 19 countries of origin in a licensed warehouse to one of several ports in the U.S. and 
Europe, with stated premiums/discounts. Second Cup sources high altitude Arabica coffee which tends to trade at a 
premium above the “C” coffee commodity price. Second Cup has contracts with third party companies to purchase the 
coffee that is sold in all Second Cup cafés. In terms of these supply agreements, Second Cup has guaranteed a minimum 
volume of coffee purchases of $5,621 USD (2012 - $4,421 USD) during fiscal 2014. The coffee purchase commitment is 
comprised of three components: unapplied futures commitment contracts, fixed price physical contracts and flat price 
physical contracts. 

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS    
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
27

Second Cup has entered into a distribution agreement and has partnered with a vendor to wholesale its products through 
grocery and other retail outlets across Canada. As a result of the distribution agreement, the Company is required to pay 
a portion of one-time listing fees in the amount of up to $1,050 in 2014.

Second Cup is the primary coordinator of café construction costs on behalf its franchise partners and for Company-
operated  cafés.  There  is  $1,433  of  contractual  commitments  pertaining  to  construction  costs  for  new  locations  and 
renovations.  The  Company  finances  construction  costs  for  franchise  projects  from  deposits  received  from  franchise 
partners and corporate projects from the Company’s cash flows.

Related parties
The Company has identified related parties as key management, members of the Board of Directors, and shareholders 
that effectively exercise significant influence on the Company. Such related parties include any entities acting with or on 
behalf of the aforementioned parties. 

In  2013,  the  Company  incurred  a  total  of  $153  in  legal  expenditures  incurred  on  behalf  of  shareholders  and  related 
companies with respect to the reconstitution of the Board of Directors. These items were recorded at their exchange 
amount as restructuring expenses.

EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES 

The  Chief  Executive  Officer  (“CEO”)  and  Chief  Financial  Officer  (“CFO”)  must  acknowledge  they  are  responsible  for 
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting (“ICFR”) for 
the Company. The control framework used by the CEO and CFO to design the Company’s ICFR is Internal Control Over 
Financial Reporting - Guidance for Smaller Public Companies as issued by COSO. In addition, in respect of:

Disclosure controls and procedures 
The  CEO  and  CFO  must  certify  they  have  designed  the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or  caused  them  to  be 
designed under their supervision, to provide reasonable assurance that material information relating to the Company is 
made known to them in a timely manner and that information required under securities legislation is recorded, processed, 
summarized and reported in a timely manner. 

During the last week of the second Quarter of 2013, the Company appointed a new interim CFO who subsequently was 
appointed as CFO during the third Quarter. The Company also hired a new Director of Finance in the second Quarter. 
Given the experience of both the CFO and the Director of Finance, as well as the continuity of the rest of the senior 
leadership team, we believe the transition was effective and had no impact on the disclosure controls and procedures.

During the first Quarter of 2014, the Company appointed a new CEO. Given the continuity of the senior leadership team 
which included the effective transition of the new CFO over a reasonable duration during the fiscal Year as documented 
above, we believe the transition was effective and had no impact on the disclosure controls and procedures.

As  at  March  7,  2014,  the  Company’s  management,  under  the  supervision  of,  and  with  the  participation  of,  the  CEO 
and  CFO,  evaluated  the  design  of  the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures.  Based  on  this  evaluation,  the  CEO  and  
CFO  have  concluded  that,  as  at  December  28,  2013,  the  Company’s  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  were 
appropriately designed. 

Consistent  with  the  concept  of  reasonable  assurance,  the  Company  recognizes  that  the  relative  cost  of  maintaining 
these controls and procedures should not exceed their expected benefits. As such, the Company’s disclosure controls 
and  procedures  can  only  provide  reasonable,  and  not  absolute,  assurance  that  the  objectives  of  such  controls  and 
procedures are met.

During the Year ended December 28, 2013 and up to the date of the approval of the Audited Financial Statements and 
MD&A, there has been no change that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect the Company’s 
disclosure controls and procedures. 

The Second Cup Ltd. Annual Report 201328

Internal controls over financial reporting
The CEO and CFO must certify they have designed such internal controls over financial reporting, or caused them to be 
designed under their supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the 
preparation of the Audited Financial Statements for external purposes in accordance with IFRS. 

During the last week of the second Quarter of 2013, the Company appointed a new interim CFO who subsequently was 
appointed as CFO during the third Quarter. The Company also hired a new Director of Finance in the second Quarter. 
Given the experience of both the CFO and the Director of Finance, as well as the continuity of the rest of the senior 
leadership team, we believe the transition was effective and had no impact on the internal controls over financial reporting.

During the first Quarter of 2014, the Company appointed a new CEO. Given the continuity of the senior leadership team 
which included the effective transition of the new CFO over a reasonable duration during the fiscal Year as documented 
above, we believe the transition was effective and had no impact on the internal controls over financial reporting.

As at March 7, 2014, the Company’s management, under the supervision of, and with the participation of, the CEO and 
CFO, evaluated the design of the controls over financial reporting. No material weaknesses in the design of these controls 
over financial reporting were identified. Based on this evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that, as at December 
28, 2013, the Company’s controls over financial reporting were appropriately designed and were operating effectively.

Consistent with the concept of reasonable assurance, the Company recognizes that the relative cost of maintaining these 
controls should not exceed their expected benefits. As such, the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting can 
only provide reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the objectives of such controls are met. 

During the Year ended December 28, 2013 and up to the date of the approval of the Audited Financial Statements and 
MD&A, there has been no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, 
or is reasonably likely to materially affect the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

The preparation of the Audited Financial Statements requires management to make estimates, assumptions, and use 
judgement  in  applying  its  accounting  policies  and  estimates  and  assumptions  about  the  future.  Estimates  and  other 
judgements  are  continuously  evaluated  and  are  based  on  management’s  experience  and  other  factors,  including 
expectations about future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Revisions to accounting 
estimates  are  recognized  in  the  period  in  which  the  estimates  are  revised  and  in  any  future  periods  affected.  The 
accounting estimates will, by definition, seldom equal the related actual results.

Estimates
The following are examples of estimates and assumptions the Company makes: 
• The allowance for doubtful accounts;
• The allowance for inventory obsolescence;
• The estimated useful lives of assets;
• The recoverability of tangible and intangible assets subject to depreciation, amortization, or with indefinite lives;
• The derivation of income tax assets and liabilities;
• Café lease provisions; and
• Gift card breakage.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS   29

Use of judgement
The following discusses the most significant accounting judgements and estimates that the Company has made in the 
preparation of the Audited Financial Statements:

(i) Impairment charges
Impairment analysis is an area involving management judgement requiring assessment as to whether the carrying value 
of assets is recoverable. Fair value less cost to sell is determined by estimating the net present value of future cash flows 
derived from such assets using cash flow projections that have been discounted at an appropriate rate and based on a 
market participant’s view. In calculating the net present value of the future cash flows, certain assumptions are required 
to be made in respect of highly uncertain matters including: 
• Growth in total revenue;
• Change and timing of cash flows such as the increase or decrease of expenditures;
• Selection of discount rates to reflect the risks involved; and
• Applying judgement in cash flows specific to cash generating units. 

Changing the assumptions selected by management, in particular, the discount rate and the growth rate assumptions 
used in the cash flow projections, could significantly affect the impairment evaluations and recoverable amounts.

(ii) Deferred income taxes
The timing of reversal of temporary differences and the expected income allocation to various tax jurisdictions within 
Canada affect the effective income tax rate used to compute the deferred income taxes. Management estimates the 
reversals and income allocation based on historical and budgeted operating results and income tax laws existing at the 
Statements of Financial Position dates. In addition, management occasionally estimates the current or future deductibility 
of certain expenditures, affecting current or deferred income tax balances and expenses.

(iii) Estimated useful lives
Management  estimates  the  useful  lives  of  property  and  equipment  based  on  the  period  during  which  the  assets  are 
expected  to  be  available-for-use.  The  amounts  and  timing  of  recorded  expenses  for  depreciation  of  property  and 
equipment for any period are affected by these estimated useful lives. It is possible that changes in these factors may 
cause significant changes in the estimated useful lives of the Company’s property and equipment in the future.

(iv) Café lease provisions
Café lease provisions require judgement to evaluate the likelihood and measurement of settlements, temporary payouts, 
or  sub-leasing.  Management  works  with  landlords  and  franchise  partners  to  obtain  adequate  information  needed  to 
make applicable judgements.

RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES

This section is qualified by the section “Caution Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” at the beginning of this MD&A.

The performance of Second Cup is primarily dependent on its ability to maintain and increase the sales of existing cafés, 
add new profitable cafés to the network and redevelop and modernize cafés as their leases come due. System sales of 
the Second Cup café network are affected by various external factors that can affect the specialty coffee industry as a 
whole. Potential risks include the following: 

The  specialty  coffee  industry  is  characterized  by  intense  competition  with  respect  to  price,  location,  coffee  and  food 
quality,  and  numerous  factors  affecting  discretionary  consumer  spending.  Competitors  include  national  and  regional 
chains, independent cafés, all restaurants and food service outlets that serve coffee, and supermarkets that compete in 
the whole bean and roast & ground segments. If Second Cup cafés are unable to successfully compete in the Canadian 
specialty coffee industry, System sales of cafés may be adversely affected, which, in turn, may adversely affect the ability 
of Second Cup to pay dividends.

Growth of the café network depends on Second Cup’s ability to secure and build desirable locations and find high calibre, 
qualified franchise partners to operate them. Adverse credit markets, such as those currently being experienced, may 
affect the ability of franchise partners to obtain new credit or refinance existing credit on economically reasonable terms.

The Second Cup Ltd. Annual Report 201330

Second Cup faces competition for café locations and franchise partners from its competitors and from franchisors and 
operators of other businesses. The success of Second Cup franchise partners is significantly influenced by the location 
of their cafés. There can be no assurance that current Second Cup café locations will continue to be attractive, or that 
additional café sites can be located and secured as demographic and traffic patterns change. Also, there is no guarantee 
that  the  property  leases  in  respect  of  the  Second  Cup  cafés  will  be  renewed  or  suitable  alternative  locations  will  be 
obtained and, in such event, one or several cafés could be closed. It is possible that the current locations or economic 
conditions where Second Cup cafés are located could decline in the future, resulting in potentially reduced sales in those 
locations, which will have an adverse effect on System sales of cafés. There is no assurance that future sites will produce 
the same results as past sites. There is also no assurance that a franchise partner will continue to pay its rental obligations 
in a timely manner, which could result in Second Cup being obligated to pay the rental obligations pursuant to its head 
lease commitment, which would adversely affect the profitability of Second Cup’s business.

A shortage in supply or an increase in the price of premium quality coffee beans could adversely affect Second Cup. 
Second  Cup  has  no  material  long-term  contracts  with  coffee  bean  suppliers  and  relies  on  historical  relationships  to 
ensure  availability.  While  there  are  a  number  of  coffee  bean  suppliers,  there  can  be  no  assurance  that  coffee  bean 
suppliers that have relationships with Second Cup will continue to supply coffee beans at competitive prices. 

The Canadian specialty coffee industry is also affected by changes in discretionary spending patterns, which are in turn 
dependent on consumer confidence, disposable consumer income and general economic conditions. Factors such as 
a change in general economic conditions, recessionary or inflationary trends, job security and unemployment, equity 
market levels, consumer credit availability and overall consumer confidence levels may affect their business. The specialty 
coffee industry is also affected by demographic trends, traffic and weather patterns, as well as the type, number, and 
location of competing cafés. 

Second Cup’s business could be adversely affected by increased concerns about food safety in general or other unusual 
events. In February 2014, it was announced that the government of Ontario is in the process of advancing legislation 
that would require quick service restaurants to post calorie counts on its menu boards. Such legislation has not been 
finalized as at the date of this MD&A. Overt disclosure of calorie counts may alter consumer spending habits which would 
impact store sales. It is also undetermined what the potential impact of associated financial requirements would be to 
fulfil legislative requirements.

The partnership with Kraft Canada Inc. to distribute whole bean and roast & ground coffees requires significant investments 
of  non-refundable  listing  fees.  The  TASSIMO  self-serve  product  has  achieved  positive  results  and  the  Company  will 
continue to evaluate this area of potential growth, including the consideration of adding further product offerings. The 
launch  of  whole  bean  and  roast  &  ground  coffees  are  a  complementary  but  different  product  line  in  comparison  to 
self-serve. Thus there is a risk that the success of products offered through grocery and retail channels may differ.

Second Cup relies heavily on information technology network infrastructure. The Company’s ability to manage operations 
effectively  and  efficiently  depends  on  the  reliability  and  capacity  of  these  technology  systems,  most  of  which  are 
administered by third party suppliers. The Company relies on POS for system sales for both marketing trends and royalty 
calculations through the IT network infrastructure. Cafés rely on IT network infrastructure to order goods and process 
credit, debit and café card transactions. Head Office financial and administrative functions rely on IT infrastructure for 
accurate  and  reliable  information.  The  failure  of  these  systems  to  operate  effectively,  or  problems  with  upgrading  or 
replacing systems could cause a material negative financial result. The Company is continually reviewing its systems and 
procedures to minimize risk. 

The loss of key personnel and/or a shortage of experienced management and hourly employees could have an adverse 
impact on Second Cup’s operations and cafés. 

A more detailed discussion of the risks and uncertainties affecting Second Cup is set out in the Second Cup’s Annual 
Information Form, which is available at www.sedar.com.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS   OUTLOOK

31

This section is qualified by the section “Caution Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” at the beginning of this MD&A.

The Second Cup business continues to operate in a competitive marketplace and a challenging consumer environment. 
In 2013, management continued to invest in the business, including investing in the development of a loyalty program 
which  is  being  tested  in  31  cafés,  with  positive  initial  results.  In  2014,  Second  Cup  plans  to  roll  out  the  loyalty  
program nationally.

As well, the Company introduced and will further expand a coffee revitalization program. Promotions will be geared to 
put coffee at the forefront as one of the Company’s key success factors. Included in the revitalization program was the 
expansion of the TASSIMO T-Disc line, which was launched in market late in the Quarter. 

Second Cup has announced that it will leverage its success with its partner, Kraft Canada Inc., to distribute its Second 
Cup branded whole bean and roast & ground coffee to grocery stores across Canada commencing in February 2014. 
The new revenue stream is intended to increase corporate sales, while increasing brand presence in the marketplace to 
attract customers into cafés in addition to their homes. This new venture will require an initial investment in listing fees and 
potential advertising support in 2014. 

Second  Cup  will  continue  to  improve  the  café  network  with  the  opening  of  cafés  while  closing  below  average  
performing cafés. 

As a result of the reconstitution of the Board of Directors, a change in the Chief Executive Officer, and an ongoing review 
of the Second Cup’s operational direction, the Company may incur certain transitional and restructuring related charges 
onward in 2014. The Company will focus on embracing change and implementing improvements to better the economic 
health of the franchise network, which is intended to ultimately benefit the Company and its shareholders.

DEFINITIONS AND DISCUSSION ON CERTAIN NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

In this MD&A, the Company reports certain non-IFRS measures such as System sales of cafés, Same café sales, EBITDA, 
Adjusted EBITDA, and Adjusted earnings per share. 

System sales of cafés
System  sales  of  cafés  comprise  the  net  revenue  reported  to  Second  Cup  by  franchisees  of  Second  Cup  cafés  and 
by  Company-operated  cafés.  This  measure  is  useful  in  assessing  the  operating  performance  of  the  entire  Company 
network, such as capturing the net growth of the overall café network. Sales are reported by franchisees to Second Cup 
on a weekly basis without audit or other form of independent assurance. Second Cup’s substantiation of sales reported 
by its franchisees is through analytical and financial reviews performed by management, comparison to sales data on the 
POS, on-site visits, and analyses of raw materials purchased by the cafés as reported by authorized vendors. 

Increases in System sales of cafés result from the addition of new cafés and Same café sales (as described below). The 
primary factors influencing the number of cafés added to the Second Cup café network include the availability and cost 
of high quality locations, competition from other specialty coffee retailers and other businesses for prime locations, and 
the availability of qualified franchisees. 

System sales of cafés are also affected by the permanent closure of Second Cup cafés. Cafés are closed when they 
cease  to  be  viable  or,  occasionally,  when  a  renewal  of  a  lease  for  a  particular  location  is  not  available  or  when  an 
alternative, preferable location is available. 

Same café sales
Same café sales represents the percentage change, on average, in sales at cafés (franchised and Company-operated) 
operating system-wide that have been open for more than 12 months. It is one of the key metrics the Company uses to 
assess its performance with specific focus on organic growth. Organic growth is an indicator on how the Company is 
impacted by operational effectiveness, the results of marketing efforts, pricing, and responsiveness to competition. Same 
café sales provides a useful comparison between periods while also encompassing other matters such as seasonality. 
The two principal factors that affect same café sales are changes in customer traffic and changes in average sale. 

The Second Cup Ltd. Annual Report 201332

Operating income (loss)
Operating income (loss) represents Revenue, less Cost of goods sold, less Operating expenses, and less Impairment 
charges. This measure is not defined under IFRS, although the measure is derived from input figures in accordance with 
IFRS.  Management  views  this  as  an  indicator  of  financial  performance  that  excludes  costs  pertaining  to  Interest  and 
financing, and Income taxes.

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA
EBITDA  represents  earnings  before  interest,  taxes,  depreciation,  and  amortization.  As  there  is  no  generally  accepted 
method  of  calculating  EBITDA,  the  measure  as  calculated  by  the  Company  is  likely  not  comparable  to  similarly  titled 
measures  reported  by  other  issuers.  EBITDA  is  presented  as  management  believes  it  is  a  useful  indicator  of  the 
Company’s ability to meet debt service, capital expenditure requirements, and evaluate liquidity. Management interprets 
trends in EBITDA as an indicator of relative financial performance. EBITDA should not be considered by an investor as an 
alternative to net income or cash flows as determined in accordance with IFRS.

Impairment charges are a reconciling item in the calculation of Adjusted EBITDA as its nature is non-cash and management 
interprets this measure to be similar in substance to depreciation and amortization. This interpretation by management is 
consistently applied regardless of whether impairment charges are or are expected to be recurring. 

Restructuring charges are a reconciling item in the definition of Adjusted EBITDA as management believes such costs 
are non-recurring and not an indicative performance measure directly linked to the focus of the Company’s business 
operations  and  strategic  imperatives.  As  there  is  no  generally  accepted  method  of  calculating  Adjusted  EBITDA,  the 
measure as calculated by the Company is likely not comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other issuers. 
Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered by an investor as an alternative to net income or cash flows as determined 
in accordance with IFRS.

The change in estimate pertaining to the gift card breakage rate was captured as a reconciling item to Adjusted EBITDA 
as  management  believes  this  change  in  estimate  was  material  and  not  an  indicative  performance  measure  used  to 
evaluate the sustainable current and ongoing financial performance. 

A reconciliation of net income (loss) to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA is provided below:

Net income (loss) 
Net interest and financing 
Income taxes (recovery) 
Depreciation of property and equipment 
Amortization of intangible assets 
(Gain) loss on disposal of property and equipment 
EBITDA 
Impairment charges 
Restructuring charges 
Gift card breakage rate - change in estimate 
Adjusted EBITDA 

$ 

13 weeks  
ended 
December 
28, 2013 
1,177 
254 
460 
206 
142 
(181) 
2,058 
299 
883 
(372) 
2,868 

$ 

$ 

13 weeks 
ended 
December 
29, 2012 
(12,024) 
128 
(1,092) 
208 
116 
42 
(12,622) 
15,6491 
- 
- 
3,027 

$ 

$ 

52 weeks 
ended 
December 
28, 2013 
(7,369) 
516 
(269) 
749 
502 
(197) 
(6,068) 
13,552 
883 
(797) 
7,570 

$ 

52 weeks 
ended
December

$ 

29, 2012        
(9,404)
503
651
716
451

70       
(7,013)
15,6561
-
-       
8,643           

$ 

1  As a result of the reclassification of impairment charges discussed in note 2a of the Audited Financial Statements, adjusted earnings 

per share for comparative amounts were amended in order to provide adequate comparative figures.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS    
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
33

Adjusted basic and diluted earnings per share
Adjusted  earnings  per  share  represents  earnings  per  share  excluding  impairment  and  restructuring  charges,  and  the 
change in estimate pertaining to the gift card breakage rate. Impairment charges of trademarks and goodwill are non-cash, 
but material items that were adjusted as management concluded that this was not a direct measure of the company’s 
focus  on  day  to  day  operations,  is  not  indicative  of  future  operating  results,  and  thus  better  evaluates  the  underlying 
business  of  the  Company.  Impairment  charges  of  tangible  assets  are  primarily  related  to  leasehold  improvements  at 
Company-operated cafés. The Company typically operates such cafés for exploratory purposes or with the intention to 
improve underperformers and to subsequently refranchise the cafés. Restructuring charges are a reconciling item as 
management believes these costs are non-recurring and not an indicative performance measure directly linked to the 
focus of the Company’s business operations on a per share basis. The change in estimate pertaining to the gift card 
breakage rate was captured as a reconciling item to Adjusted earnings per share as management believed this change in 
estimate was material and not an indicative performance measure used to evaluate the sustainable current and ongoing 
financial performance.

A reconciliation of Adjusted basic and diluted earnings per share is provided below:

Net income (loss) 
Impairment charges 
Restructuring charges 
Gift card breakage rate - change in estimate 
Tax effect of impairment and restructuring charges, and  
    the change in estimate of the gift card breakage rate 
Adjusted earnings 
Weighted average number of shares issued  
    and outstanding (unrounded) 
Adjusted basic and diluted earnings per share 

13 weeks  
ended 
December 
28, 2013 
1,177 
299 
883 
(372) 

$ 

13 weeks 
ended 
December 
29, 2012 
(12,024) 
15,6491 
- 
- 

$ 

52 weeks 
ended 
December 
28, 2013 
(7,369) 
13,552 
883 
(797) 

$ 

52 weeks 
ended
December

$ 

29, 2012                 
(9,404)
15,6561
-
-

(215) 
1,722 

(1,795)1 
1,8301 

(1,859) 
4,410 

(1,799)1 
4,4531

  9,903,045 
0.17 
$ 

  9,903,045 
0.181 
$ 

  9,903,045 
0.45 
$ 

  9,903,045            
0.451 
$ 

1  As a result of the reclassification of impairment charges discussed in note 2a of the Audited Financial Statements, adjusted earnings 

per share for comparative amounts were amended in order to provide adequate comparative figures.

The Second Cup Ltd. Annual Report 2013 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
35

The Second Cup Ltd.
 AudIted FInAncIAl  
 stAteMents
For the 52 weeks ended  
December 28, 2013 and December 29, 2012

The Second Cup Ltd. Annual Report 2013PricewaterhouseCoopersLLPPwCTower,18YorkStreet,Suite2600,Toronto,Ontario,CanadaM5J0B2T:+14168631133,F:+14163658215“PwC”referstoPricewaterhouseCoopersLLP,anOntariolimitedliabilitypartnership.March7,2014IndependentAuditor’sReportTotheShareholdersofTheSecondCupLtd.WehaveauditedtheaccompanyingfinancialstatementsofTheSecondCupLtd.,whichcomprisethestatementsoffinancialpositionasatDecember28,2013andDecember29,2012andthestatementsofoperationsandcomprehensiveincome(loss),statementsofchangesinequityandstatementsofcashflowsforthetwofifty-twoweekperiodsthenended,andtherelatednotes,whichcompriseasummaryofsignificantaccountingpoliciesandotherexplanatoryinformation.Management’sresponsibilityforthefinancialstatementsManagementisresponsibleforthepreparationandfairpresentationofthesefinancialstatementsinaccordancewithInternationalFinancialReportingStandards,andforsuchinternalcontrolasmanagementdeterminesisnecessarytoenablethepreparationoffinancialstatementsthatarefreefrommaterialmisstatement,whetherduetofraudorerror.Auditor’sresponsibilityOurresponsibilityistoexpressanopiniononthesefinancialstatementsbasedonouraudit.WeconductedourauditinaccordancewithCanadiangenerallyacceptedauditingstandards.Thosestandardsrequirethatwecomplywithethicalrequirementsandplanandperformtheaudittoobtainreasonableassuranceaboutwhetherthefinancialstatementsarefreefrommaterialmisstatement.Anauditinvolvesperformingprocedurestoobtainauditevidenceabouttheamountsanddisclosuresinthefinancialstatements.Theproceduresselecteddependontheauditor’sjudgment,includingtheassessmentoftherisksofmaterialmisstatementofthefinancialstatements,whetherduetofraudorerror.Inmakingthoseriskassessments,theauditorconsidersinternalcontrolrelevanttotheentity’spreparationandfairpresentationofthefinancialstatementsinordertodesignauditproceduresthatareappropriateinthecircumstances,butnotforthepurposeofexpressinganopinionontheeffectivenessoftheentity’sinternalcontrol.Anauditalsoincludesevaluatingtheappropriatenessofaccountingpoliciesusedandthereasonablenessofaccountingestimatesmadebymanagement,aswellasevaluatingtheoverallpresentationofthefinancialstatements.Webelievethattheauditevidencewehaveobtainedinourauditissufficientandappropriatetoprovideabasisforourauditopinion.OpinionInouropinion,thefinancialstatementspresentfairly,inallmaterialrespects,thefinancialpositionofTheSecondCupLtd.asatDecember28,2013andDecember29,2012anditsfinancialperformanceanditscashflowsfortheyearsthenendedinaccordancewithInternationalFinancialReportingStandards.CharteredProfessionalAccountants,LicensedPublicAccountantsThe Second Cup Ltd.
 stAteMents oF FInAncIAl posItIon 
As at December 28, 2013 and December 29, 2012 
(Expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars)

37

December	28,	
2013	

December	29,
2012	

$  6,501 
  4,368 
220 
123 
190 
  11,402 

701 
  3,507 
  61,730 
$  77,340 

$  4,586 
847 
717 
138 
  3,895 
878 
  11,061 

  1,380 
428 
  11,089 
  7,418 
  31,376 
  45,964 
$  77,340 

$  3,880
  4,616
265
137
695 
  9,593

741
  3,544
  74,802 
$  88,680 

$  3,123
448
720
318
  4,560
  1,480 
  10,649

683
421
  11,037
  9,190 
  31,980 
  56,700 
$  88,680 

ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents 
Trade and other receivables (note 7) 
Notes and leases receivable (note 8) 
Inventories (note 9) 
Prepaid expenses and other assets  

Non-current assets
Notes and leases receivable (note 8) 
Property and equipment (note 10) 
Intangible assets (note 11) 
Total assets 

LIABILITIES
Current liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (note 12) 
Provisions (note 13) 
Other liabilities (note 14) 
Income tax payable 
Gift card liability 
Deposits from franchise partners 

Non-current liabilities
Provisions (note 13) 
Other liabilities (note 14) 
Long-term debt (note 15) 
Deferred income taxes  
Total liabilities 
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY 
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity 

Contingencies, commitments and guarantees (note 22) and subsequent event (note 25).
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.

Approved by the Directors March 7, 2014 

Michael Bregman, Director                 Rael Merson, Director 

The Second Cup Ltd. Annual Report 2013	
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
38

The Second Cup Ltd.

 stAteMents oF operAtIons And  
 coMprehensIVe loss
For the periods ended December 28, 2013 and December 29, 2012 
(Expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts)

Revenue 
Royalties 
Sale of goods 
Services 

Cost of goods sold 
Gross profit 

Operating expenses (note 16) 
Impairment charges (note 17) 
Operating loss  

Interest and financing (note 18) 
Loss before income taxes 
Income taxes (recovery) (note 19) 
Net loss and comprehensive loss for the period 

Basic and diluted loss per share (note 20) 

See accompanying notes to the financial statements.

2013	

2012	

$  14,117 
  5,506 
  7,565 
  27,188 

  4,054 
  23,134 

  16,704 
  13,552 
(7,122) 

516 
(7,638) 
(269) 
(7,369) 

(0.74) 

$ 

$ 

$  14,927
  4,698
  6,721 
  26,346

  3,523 
  22,823

  15,417
  15,656 
(8,250)

503 
(8,753)
651 
(9,404)

(0.95)

$ 

$ 

	
	
	
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The Second Cup Ltd.

 stAteMents oF chAnGes In  
 shAreholders’ eQuItY
For the periods ended December 28, 2013 and December 29, 2012 
(Expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars)

39

Share	
Capital	

Contributed	
Surplus	

Retained
Earnings

(Deficit)	

Total	

Balance - December 31, 2011 

$ 

1,000 

$  61,557 

$ 

8,845 

$  71,402 

Net loss for the period 

- 

- 

(9,404) 

(9,404)

Dividends to shareholders 
Balance - December 29, 2012 

- 
1,000 

$ 

- 
$  61,557 

(5,298) 
(5,857) 

$ 

(5,298)
$  56,700 

Net loss for the period 

- 

- 

(7,369) 

(7,369)

Dividends to shareholders 
Balance - December 28, 2013 

- 
1,000 

$ 

- 
$  61,557 

(3,367) 
(16,593) 

$ 

(3,367)
$  45,964 

See accompanying notes to the financial statements.

The Second Cup Ltd. Annual Report 2013 
 
	
	
	
	
	
	
   
   
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
   
   
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
   
40

The Second Cup Ltd.

 stAteMents oF cAsh FloWs 

For the periods ended December 28, 2013 and December 29, 2012
(Expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars)

CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN)
Operating activities
Loss for the period 
Items not involving cash 
   Depreciation of property and equipment  
   Amortization of intangible assets 
   Impairment charges 
   Amortization of deferred financing charges 
   Amortization of provisions 
   Amortization of leasehold inducements 
   Deferred income taxes  
   (Gain) Loss on disposal of capital related items  
   Movement in fair value of interest rate swap 
Changes in non-cash working capital (note 21) 
Cash provided by operating activities 
Investing activities 
Proceeds from disposal of capital related items 
Cash payments for capital expenditures (note 21) 
Proceeds from repayment of leases receivable  
Proceeds from repayment of notes receivable 
Investment in notes receivable 
Cash used by investing activities 
Financing activities 
Dividends paid to shareholders 
Repayment of note payable 
Deferred financing charges  
Payments on long-term lease  
Cash used by financing activities 
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents during the period 
Cash and cash equivalents - Beginning of the period 
Cash and cash equivalents - End of the period 

Supplemental cash flow information is provided in note 21.
See accompanying notes to the financial statements. 

	 2013	

2012	

$ 

(7,369) 

$ 

(9,404)

749 
502 
  13,552 
38 
(116) 
69 
(1,772) 
(197) 
44 
  2,178 
  7,678 

  1,240 
(2,904) 
- 
13 
(10) 
(1,661) 

(3,367) 
- 
(29) 
- 
(3,396) 
  2,621 
  3,880 
$  6,501 

716
451
  15,656
82
(89)
26
(993)
70
(206)
(1,159)
  5,150 

350
(1,938)
36
185
- 
(1,367)

(5,298)
(18)
(50)
(2)
(5,368)
(1,585)
  5,465 
$  3,880 

	
	
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The Second Cup Ltd.

 notes to the FInAncIAl stAteMents
For the periods ended December 28, 2013 and December 29, 2012
(Expressed in thousands of Canadian dollars, except per share amounts)

41

 contents

GENERAL APPLICATION 

1. Organization and nature of business 
2. Summary of significant accounting policies 
3. Changes in accounting policies 
4. Share capital 
5. Management of capital 
6.  Financial instruments and financial 

risk management 

STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION FOCUSED 

7. Trade and other receivables 

8. Notes and leases receivable 

9. Inventories 

10. Property and equipment 

11. Intangible assets 

12. Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 

13. Provisions 

14. Other liabilities 

15. Long-term debt 

41
41
49
50
50

50

53

53

53

54

55

56

56

57

57

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND  
COMPREHENSIVE LOSS FOCUSED 
16. Operating expenses 
17. Impairment charges 
18. Interest and financing 
19. Income taxes (recovery) 
20. Basic and diluted loss per share 

OTHER 
21. Supplemental cash flow information 
22. Contingencies, commitments and guarantees 
23. Related parties 
24.  Long-term incentive plan and directors’ 

deferred share unit plan 

25. Subsequent event 

58
58
60
60
61

61
62
62

63
64

1. ORGANIzATION AND NATURE OF BUSINESS

The Second Cup Ltd. (“Second Cup” or “the Company”) is Canada’s largest specialty coffee franchisor (as measured by 
the number of cafés) with 356 cafés operating under the trade name Second Cup™ in Canada, of which ten are Company-
operated and the balance are operated by franchise partners. 

Second Cup owns the trademarks, trade names, operating procedures and systems and other intellectual property used in 
connection with the operation of Second Cup cafés only in Canada, excluding the Territory of Nunavut.

Second  Cup  is  incorporated  under  the  Business  Corporations  Act  (Ontario)  in  2011  and  domiciled  in  Canada.  The 
address of its registered office is 6303 Airport Road, 2nd Floor, Mississauga, Ontario, L4V 1R8. The Company’s website is  
www.secondcup.com.  The  common  shares  of  the  Company  are  listed  on  the  Toronto  Stock  Exchange  under  the  
symbol “SCU”.

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

a. Basis of preparation
The financial statements of Second Cup have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards 
(“IFRS”)  and  International  Financial  Reporting  Interpretation  Committee  (“IFRIC”)  interpretations.  The  accounting  policies 
applied in the financial statements are based on IFRS effective for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2013. The Company’s 
functional currency is the Canadian dollar. 

The Second Cup Ltd. Annual Report 2013 
 
 
42

Second Cup’s fiscal year follows the method implemented by many retail entities, such that each quarter will consist of 13 
weeks and will end on the Saturday closest to the calendar quarter end. The fiscal year is made up of 52 or 53 week periods 
ending on the last Saturday of December.

Second Cup manages an advertising and co-operative fund (the “Co-op Fund”) established to collect and administer funds 
contributed  for  use  in  advertising  and  promotional  programs,  and  initiatives  designed  to  increase  sales  and  enhance  the 
reputation of the Second Cup brand. Contributions to the Co-op Fund are required to be made from both franchised and 
Company-operated cafés and are based on a percentage of café sales. The revenue, expenses and cash flows of the Co-op 
Fund are not consolidated, but netted in the Company’s Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss in operating 
expenses when there is a spend deficit, or carried on the balance sheet in accounts payable if there is a spend surplus. 
The assets and liabilities of the Co-op Fund are included in the assets and liabilities of the Company on the Statements of 
Financial Position. The policy is established because the contributions to the Co-op Fund are segregated, the contributions 
are designated for a specific purpose, the Company is acting as an agent, and this accounting treatment is common practice 
in the Company’s industry.

Reclassification
Certain  comparable  figures  have  been  reclassified  to  conform  to  the  current  period’s  financial  statement  presenta-
tion.  Management  determined  that  reclassification  better  captures  the  substance  of  the  balances  in  conjunction  with  the 
Company’s accounting policies. The reclassification had no impact on the Statements of Operations and Comprehensive 
Loss nor current vs. non-current presentation on the Statements of Financial Position. The 2012 Statements of Financial 
Position was reclassified as follows:

Item	in	current	liabilities	
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 
Provisions 
Other liabilities 
Deposits from franchise partners 

  $ 

2012	as	
reported	
3,313 
365 
189 
1,904 

$ 

Reclassification	
impact	
(190) 
83 
531 
(424) 

2012
reclassified				
$  3,123
448
720
  1,480

Impairment charges were previously presented showing solely charges related to intangible assets and goodwill. Impairment 
pertaining to property and equipment was classified under operating expenses. The reclassification captures all impairment 
charges combined under one line item.

2012 operating expenses and impairment charges were reclassified as follows:

Item	in	Statements	of	Operations	and	
Comprehensive	Loss	
Operating expenses 
Impairment of goodwill and trademarks 
Impairment charges 

2012	as	
reported	
  $  15,779 
  15,294 
- 

Reclassification	
impact	
(362) 
(15,294) 
15,656 

$ 

2012
reclassified						
$  15,417
-
  15,656

b. Segmented information and reporting
Operating segments are reported in a manner consistent with the internal reporting provided to the chief operating decision 
maker. The Company substantially operates and is managed as one reportable segment. The Company is structured as a 
franchisor with all of its operating revenues derived in Canada. Operating revenues comprise of royalties, the sale of goods 
from Company-operated cafés, and the sale of goods through ancillary channels, and other service fees. Management is 
organized based on the Company’s operations as a whole rather than the specific revenue streams. 

c. Critical accounting estimates and the use of judgements
The  preparation  of  financial  statements  requires  management  to  make  estimates,  assumptions,  and  use  judgement  in 
applying  its  accounting  policies  and  estimates  and  assumptions  about  the  future.  Estimates  and  other  judgements  are 
continuously evaluated and are based on management’s experience and other factors, including expectations about future 
events  that  are  believed  to  be  reasonable  under  the  circumstances.  Revisions  to  accounting  estimates  are  recognized  in 
the period in which the estimates are revised and in any future periods affected. The accounting estimates will, by definition, 
seldom equal the related actual results.

notes to the financial statements	
	
	
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
	
	
 
 
 
 
 
 
43

Estimates
The following are examples of estimates and assumptions the Company makes: 
• The allowance for doubtful accounts;
• The allowance for inventory obsolescence;
• The estimated useful lives of assets;
• The recoverability of tangible and intangible assets subject to depreciation, amortization, or with indefinite lives;
• The derivation of income tax assets and liabilities;
• Café lease provisions; and
• Gift card breakage.

Use of judgement
The  following  discusses  the  most  significant  accounting  judgements  and  estimates  that  the  Company  has  made  in  the 
preparation of the financial statements:

(i) Impairment charges
Impairment  analysis  is  an  area  involving  management  judgement  requiring  assessment  as  to  whether  the  carrying  value 
of assets is recoverable. Fair value less cost to sell is determined by estimating the net present value of future cash flows 
derived  from  such  assets  using  cash  flow  projections  that  have  been  discounted  at  an  appropriate  rate  and  based  on  a 
market participant’s view. In calculating the net present value of the future cash flows, certain assumptions are required to 
be made in respect of highly uncertain matters including: 
• Growth in total revenue;
• Change and timing of cash flows such as the increase or decrease of expenditures;
• Selection of discount rates to reflect the risks involved; and
• Applying judgement in cash flows specific to cash generating units. 

Changing the assumptions selected by management, in particular, the discount rate and the growth rate assumptions used 
in the cash flow projections, could significantly affect the impairment evaluations and recoverable amounts.

The  Company’s  impairment  test  includes  the  key  assumptions  related  to  sensitivity  in  the  cash  flow  projections.  Further 
details are provided in note 17 to the financial statements. 

(ii) Deferred income taxes
The timing of reversal of temporary differences and the expected income allocation to various tax jurisdictions within Canada 
affect the effective income tax rate used to compute the deferred income taxes. Management estimates the reversals and 
income allocation based on historical and budgeted operating results and income tax laws existing at the Statements of 
Financial Position dates. In addition, management occasionally estimates the current or future deductibility of certain expen-
ditures, affecting current or deferred income tax balances and expenses.

(iii) Estimated useful lives
Management estimates the useful lives of property and equipment based on the period during which the assets are expected 
to be available-for-use. The amounts and timing of recorded expenses for depreciation of property and equipment for any 
period are affected by these estimated useful lives. It is possible that changes in these factors may cause significant changes 
in the estimated useful lives of the Company’s property and equipment in the future.

(iv) Café lease provisions
Café  lease  provisions  require  judgement  to  evaluate  the  likelihood  and  measurement  of  settlements,  temporary  payouts, 
or sub-leasing. Management works with landlords and franchise partners to obtain adequate information needed to make 
applicable judgements. 

d. Financial instruments
Financial  assets  and  liabilities  are  recognized  when  the  Company  becomes  a  party  to  the  contractual  provisions  of  the 
instrument. Financial assets are derecognized when the rights to receive cash flows from the assets have expired or have 
been transferred and the Company has transferred substantially all risks and rewards of ownership. 

Financial assets and liabilities are offset and the net amount reported in the Statements of Financial Position when there is a 
legally enforceable right to offset the recognized amounts and there is an intention to settle on a net basis, or realize the asset 
and settle the liability simultaneously. The Company does not use hedge accounting.

The Second Cup Ltd. Annual Report 201344

In  respect  to  recognition,  the  Company  classifies  its  financial  instruments  in  the  following  categories  depending  on  the 
purpose for which the instruments were acquired:

Financial instrument 

Categorization 

Recognition method

Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents 
Trade and other receivables 
Notes and leases receivable 

Loans and receivables 
Loans and receivables 
Loans and receivables 

Financial liabilities
Interest rate swap 
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 
Gift card liability 
Deposits from franchise partners 
Term loan  

Fair value through profit and loss 
Other financial liabilities 
Other financial liabilities 
Other financial liabilities 
Other financial liabilities 

Amortized cost
Amortized cost
Amortized cost

Fair value
Amortized cost
Amortized cost
Amortized cost
Amortized cost

(i) Cash and cash equivalents, trade and other receivables, and notes and leases receivable: Loans and receivables are 
non-derivative  financial  assets  with  fixed  or  determinable  payments  that  are  not  quoted  in  an  active  market.  Loans  and 
receivables are initially recognized at the amount expected to be received, and if necessary less a present value discount if 
collection is to be expected beyond one year. Subsequently, loans and receivables are measured at amortized cost using 
the effective interest method less a provision for impairment, if necessary. Management has selected this classification as the 
benefit of selecting the available-for-sale classification alternative was not beneficial to the Company.

(ii) Derivative financial instruments: The Company uses derivatives in the form of interest rate swaps to manage risks related 
to its variable rate long-term debt. Management has selected the fair value through profit or loss classification as such best 
reflects management’s investment and treasury management intentions. 

Unrealized fair value gains and losses pertaining to the interest rate swap are included in interest income (expense).

(iii) Transaction costs: The Company accounts for long-term debt initially at fair value, net of any transaction costs incurred 
and,  subsequently,  at  amortized  cost  using  the  effective  interest  method.  Transaction  costs  pertaining  to  instruments 
categorized as fair value through profit and loss are recognized immediately. Transaction costs associated with instruments 
recognized at amortized cost are amortized over the expected life of the instrument. The Company has selected this clas-
sification as it results in better matching of the transaction costs with the periods benefiting from the transaction costs.

e. Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, deposits held with banks and other short-term highly liquid investments 
with original maturities of three months or less.

f. Leases receivable
The Company has entered into lease agreements acting as the lessor with some franchise partners relating to point of sale 
systems (“POS”). The lease term is for the major part of the economic life of the POS although the Company does not transfer 
title. The Company recognizes leases as finance type leases and records a lease receivable at an amount equal to the net 
investment in the lease. Leases receivable are initially recognized at the amount expected to be received, less a present value 
discount if collection is to be expected beyond one year. Subsequently, leases receivable are measured at amortized cost 
using the effective interest method less a provision for impairment.

g. Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost and net realizable value, with cost being determined on a first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) 
method. Net realizable value is the estimated recoverable amount less applicable selling expenses. If carrying value exceeds 
net realizable amount, a write-down is recognized. The write-downs are reversed if the circumstances that caused the initial 
write-down no longer exist.

notes to the financial statementsh. Property and equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation net of any impairment losses. Cost includes ex-
penditures that are directly attributable to the acquisition of the asset. Subsequent costs are included in the asset’s carrying 
value or recognized as a separate asset, as appropriate, only when it is probable that future economic benefits associated 
with  the  item  will  flow  to  the  Company  and  the  cost  can  be  measured  reliably.  The  carrying  value  of  a  replaced  asset  is 
removed when replaced. Repairs and maintenance costs are charged to the Statements of Operations and Comprehensive 
Loss during the period in which they are incurred. Where property and equipment construction projects are of a sufficient 
size and duration, an amount is capitalized for the costs used to finance construction.

Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line basis as management believes this approach best reflects consumption and 
benefit patterns pertaining to the asset’s use. Depreciation is charged commencing when the asset is available for use. The 
following rates are based on the expected useful lives of the asset:

45

Leasehold improvements 
Equipment, furniture, fixtures and other  
Computer hardware 

lesser of 10 years and the remaining term of the lease
3 to 7 years
3 years

i. Goodwill 
Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of acquisition over the fair values of assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities 
acquired. Goodwill is carried at cost less accumulated impairment losses. Goodwill is tested annually for impairment or at 
any time if an indicator for impairment exists.

j. Intangible assets
Intangible  assets  consist  of  trademarks,  franchise  rights  and  software,  which  are  amortized  or  assessed  for  impairment  
as follows:

(i) Trademarks 
Trademarks consist of trade names, operating procedures and systems and other intellectual property used in connection 
with the operation of the Second Cup cafés in Canada and are recorded at the historical cost less impairment write-downs. 
The  trademark  is  an  indefinite  life  intangible  asset  that  is  tested  annually  for  impairment  or  at  any  time  if  an  indicator  for 
impairment exists. The trademark assets do not have continual renewal requirements nor is there any deterioration incurred 
due to usage. As a result of the combination of the aforementioned, our trademark assets are considered to have indefinite 
lives. 

(ii) Franchise rights 
As a result of the acquisition of The Second Cup Ltd. in 2009 by Second Cup Royalty Income Fund, franchise rights were 
recognized as an intangible asset. The franchise rights intangible asset is based on the net present value of the discounted 
future  cash  flows  expected  from  the  existing  franchise  partners  of  Second  Cup  as  at  the  date  of  acquisition,  including 
royalties and franchise fees. Franchise rights are reviewed for impairment at any time if an indicator of impairment exists. 
Franchise rights are amortized based on the average remaining term of the existing franchise agreement.

(iii) Software 
Purchased software costs are recorded at cost and are amortized commencing when the asset is available for use. Amortiza-
tion is calculated using the straight-line basis as management believes this approach best reflects consumption and benefit 
patterns pertaining to the asset’s use. The following rate is based on the expected useful lives of the assets:

Software 

3 to 7 years

Where software implementation projects are of a sufficient size and duration, an amount is capitalized for the costs used to 
finance development.

The Second Cup Ltd. Annual Report 201346

k. Provisions
Provisions are recognized when the Company has a present legal or constructive obligation as a result of past events; it 
is more likely than not that an outflow of resources will be required to settle the obligation; and the amount can be reliably 
estimated. Provisions are measured at management’s best estimate of the expenditure required to settle the obligation at 
the end of the reporting period and are discounted to present value where the effect is material. The Company performs 
evaluations to identify onerous contracts and, where applicable, records provisions for such contracts. A summary of the 
provisions to the Company are:

(i) Headlease liabilities 
On June 27, 2009, Second Cup Trade-Marks Limited Partnership, on behalf of Second Cup Income Fund, completed the 
acquisition of all of the outstanding shares of Second Cup. Headlease liabilities represent the provision for lease guarantees 
provided by Second Cup for franchised operations at the date of acquisition. The liability was recorded at estimated fair value 
based on the net present value of the future estimated negative cash flows when Second Cup is required to cover rental 
arrears of its franchise partners, to terminate unfavourable leases or to cover shortfalls if a location is sublet to a third party. 
This liability is amortized over the average remaining length of these existing lease agreements. 

(ii) Café leases
Second Cup has lease commitments since it acts as the head tenant on most café leases. In cases where the lease contract 
specifies an ongoing or termination fee, or rents due in arrears to the landlord where the Company believes they are liable, the 
Company records a provision based on its best estimate of future cash outflows. When ceasing operations under operating 
leases where the landlord does not allow the Company to prematurely exit the lease, but allows for subleasing, the Company 
estimates the fair value of sublease income in calculating the provision to the end of the lease term. In other circumstances, 
the Company will record a provision where onerous arrangements exist as a result of the Company acting as the head tenant 
on café leases.

(iii) Other
Other provisions may include restructuring related, lawsuit related, and any other provisions. 

l. Other liabilities
(i) Deferred revenue
The Company has entered into several supply agreement contracts and receives allowances from certain suppliers in consid-
eration for the café network achieving certain volume thresholds over the term of the supply agreement. Deferred revenue is 
amortized over the term of the supply agreements based on the proportion of volume thresholds met during the fiscal year. 

Deposits from franchise partners for franchise administration fees pertaining to the commencement of a new franchise term 
or a pending transfer arrangement are accounted as deferred revenue until the revenue recognition criteria are met.

(ii) Leasehold inducements 
Leasehold inducements are amortized to rent expense on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. 

m. Income taxes
Income tax comprises current and deferred income taxes. Income taxes are recognized in the Statements of Operations and 
Comprehensive Loss except to the extent that it relates to items recognized directly in equity, in which case the income tax 
is also recognized directly in equity.

Current  income  taxes  are  the  expected  taxes  payable  on  the  taxable  income  for  the  period,  using  tax  rates  enacted,  or 
substantively enacted, at the end of the reporting period, and any adjustment to tax payable in respect of previous periods.

Deferred  income  taxes  are  recognized  in  respect  of  temporary  differences  arising  between  the  tax  bases  of  assets  and 
liabilities and their carrying values in the financial statements. Deferred income taxes are determined on a non-discounted 
basis  using  tax  rates  and  laws  that  have  been  enacted  or  substantively  enacted  at  the  Statements  of  Financial  Position 
dates and are expected to apply when the deferred income tax asset or liability is settled. Deferred income tax assets are 
recognized to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profit will be available against which the deductible temporary 
differences can be utilized.

notes to the financial statements 
47

n. Gift card liability
Second Cup has a gift card program that allows customers to prepay for future purchases by loading a dollar value onto 
their gift cards through cash or credit/debit cards in the cafés or online through credit cards, when and as needed. The gift 
card liability represents liabilities related to unused balances on the Second Cup Café Card net of estimated breakage. These 
balances are included as sales from franchised cafés, or as revenue of Company-operated cafés, at the time the customer 
redeems the amount in a café for products. 

The gift cards do not have an expiration date and the Company does not deduct non-usage fees from outstanding gift card 
balances. When the Company determines the likelihood of the gift card being redeemed by the customer is remote and there 
is not a legal obligation to remit the unredeemed gift cards to a relevant jurisdiction, this amount is recorded as breakage. The 
determination of the gift card breakage rate is based upon Company-specific historical load and redemption patterns. During 
2013, the Company revised its estimated breakage rate from 2% to 3% of gift card sales. Gift card breakage is recognized 
on a pro rata basis based on historical gift card redemption patterns commencing after a reasonable period from the date of 
the gift card sale. Breakage is recognized in other operating expenses in the Statements of Operations and Comprehensive 
Loss and a portion is allocated to the Co-op Fund.

o. Deposits from franchise partners 
The development process of a new or to be renovated café requires a deposit from a franchise partner at the outset. Deposits 
from franchise partners are applied against the cost of constructing a new café or the renovation of an existing café.

p. Revenue recognition
Revenue  is  recognized  when  it  is  probable  the  economic  benefits  will  flow  to  the  Company  and  delivery  has  occurred, 
the sales price is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. Revenue is measured at the fair value of  
the  consideration  received  or  receivable.  Revenue  is  reduced  for  estimated  customer  returns,  rebates  and  other  revenue 
related concessions.

(i) Royalties
Royalty revenue from franchised cafés is recognized as the products are sold based on agreed percentage royalty rates as 
a function of the franchise location sales. Revenue is recognized on an accrual basis in accordance with the substance of 
the relevant agreement, provided that it is probable that the economic benefits will flow to the Company and the amount of 
revenue can be measured reliably. 

(ii) Sale of goods
Revenue  from  the  sale  of  goods  from  Company-operated  cafés  and  from  the  sale  of  products  through  the  e-commerce 
channel is recognized as the products are delivered to customers.

(iii) Services
Services revenue includes initial franchise fees, renewal fees, transfer fees earned on the sale of cafés from one franchise 
partner to another, construction administration fees, product licencing revenue, wholesale revenue, purchasing coordination 
fees, and other ancillary fees (such as IT support and training fees).

Initial franchise fees are recognized as income when substantially all the initial services as required by the franchise agreement 
have been performed and risks and rewards are transferred to the franchise partner. Recognition generally occurs when the 
café commences operations. Renewal fees are recognized at the commencement of a new franchise term. Café resale fees 
are recognized when title transfers on the sale of a café between franchise partners. Construction administration fees are 
recognized on the completion of a café renovation and re-opening. All fees are recognized as revenue after the franchise 
agreement  has  been  signed  and  the  Company  has  performed  substantially  all  services  and  met  all  material  conditions 
required by the franchise agreement.

For Second Cup branded products sold by third parties, product licencing or wholesale revenue is recognized when goods 
are shipped from the distributor or manufacturer.

Purchasing  coordination  fees  are  derived  from  purchases  made  by  franchise  partners  from  approved  suppliers  and  are 
recognized as the services are rendered or goods delivered and all significant conditions have been met. 

The Second Cup Ltd. Annual Report 201348

q. Cost of goods sold
Cost of goods sold represents the product cost of goods sold in Company-operated cafés and through the e-commerce 
channel, plus the cost of direct labour to prepare and deliver the goods to the customers in the Company-operated cafés.

r. Operating leases
Operating lease payments are recognized as expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Leasehold inducements 
are amortized to rent expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term. For the purposes of determining the lease term, 
the Company considers option periods for which failure to renew the lease imposes an economic penalty on the Company 
of such an amount that the renewal appears to be reasonably assured at the inception of the lease.

s. Long-term incentive plan and Directors’ deferred share unit plan
Units  granted  under  the  management  long-term  incentive  plan  vest  over  a  three-year  period  and  are  paid  out  in  cash  at 
the end of the 3 year vesting period or upon termination of the individual. Units are granted based on a weighted average 
price of the Company’s shares prior to the grant date. The fair value of the grant is amortized over the respective vesting 
period using the graded amortization method. Compensation expense is adjusted for changes in fair value of the Company’s 
share  price  thereafter.  Any  dividends  paid  by  the  Company  during  the  vesting  period  will  be  accrued  based  on  the  total 
number of units granted. Forfeitures are adjusted and accounted in the period incurred. Amounts recognized are recorded in  
operating expenses.

Units granted under the Directors’ deferred share unit plan have graded vesting for each month of service completed over 
the course of one year. Units are paid out in cash upon the termination of the director. Units are granted based on a weighted 
average price of the Company’s shares prior to the grant date. The fair value of the grants is amortized over the respective 
vesting period using the graded amortization method. Compensation expense is adjusted for changes in fair value of the 
Company’s share price thereafter. Any dividends paid by the Company during the vesting period will be accrued based on 
the total number of units granted. Amounts recognized are recorded in operating expenses.

Recorded  values  of  both  plans  are  presented  as  Accounts  payable  and  accrued  liabilities  in  the  Statements  of  Financial 
Position.

t. Impairment of financial assets
At each reporting date, the Company assesses whether there is objective evidence that a financial asset is impaired. 

The criteria used to determine if there is objective evidence of an impairment loss include:
• significant financial difficulty of the borrower/lessee;
• delinquencies in interest or principal payments; and
• it becomes probable that the borrower/lessee will enter bankruptcy or other financial reorganization.

If such evidence exists, the Company recognizes an impairment loss for assets carried at amortized cost as follows:

The loss is the difference between the amortized cost of the loan or receivable and the present value of the estimated future 
cash flows, discounted using the instrument’s effective interest rate. The carrying value of the asset is reduced by this amount 
either directly or indirectly through the use of an allowance account.

Notes receivable and leases receivable are assessed for impairment on an individual basis based on the ability of the debtor/
lessee to make the required payments and the value of the security. When there is no longer reasonable assurance that a note 
receivable or lease receivable will be collected, its carrying value is reduced and a charge is recorded in operating expenses.

Impairment  losses  on  financial  assets  carried  at  amortized  cost  are  reversed  in  subsequent  years  if  the  amount  of  the 
loss decreases and the decrease can be related objectively to an event’s occurring after the impairment was recognized. 
Impairment losses on available-for-sale equity instruments are not reversed.

u. Impairment of non-financial assets
Property  and  equipment  and  intangible  assets  without  indefinite  lives  are  tested  for  impairment  when  events  or  changes 
in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. Assets with indefinite lives are subject to an annual 
impairment test or any time an impairment indicator exists. The Company has selected December as the mandatory annual 
test date. 

notes to the financial statementsFor the purpose of measuring recoverable amounts, assets are grouped at the lowest levels for which there are separately 
identifiable cash inflows (cash generating units or “CGUs”). The recoverable amount of each particular CGU is the higher of 
an asset’s fair value less costs to sell and value in use. Management has determined its cash generating units are:
• Franchising, distribution, and wholesale; and 
• Company-operated cafés. Each Company-operated café is considered a separate CGU. 

49

The  impairment  analysis  involves  comparing  the  carrying  value  of  the  CGUs  with  their  estimated  recoverable  amounts. 
An  impairment  loss  is  recognized  for  the  amount  by  which  the  asset’s  carrying  value  exceeds  its  recoverable  amount. 
Impairment losses for CGUs reduce first the carrying value of any goodwill allocated to that CGU. Any remaining impairment 
loss is charged pro rata to the other assets in the CGU.

The Company evaluates impairment losses, other than goodwill impairment, for potential reversals when events or circum-
stances warrant such consideration.

v. Related parties
For the purposes of these financial statements, a party is considered related to the Company if such party or the Company 
has the ability to, directly or indirectly, control or exercise significant influence over the other entity’s financial and operating 
decisions, or if the Company and such party are subject to common influence. Related parties may be individuals or other 
entities. All transactions with related parties are recorded at fair value.

w. Dividends
Dividends on common shares are recognized in the Company’s financial statements in the period in which the dividends are 
approved by the Board of Directors.

3. CHANGES IN ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The Company has adopted the following standards effective December 30, 2012, the first day of fiscal 2013, and they had 
no material effect on financial results:
• IFRS 7, Financial Instruments: Disclosures (amended);
• IFRS 10, Consolidated Financial Statements;
• IFRS 11, Joint Arrangements;
• IFRS 12, Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities;
• IFRS 13, Fair Value Measurement;

Summary of the significant new standards
IFRS 7 was amended to harmonize the disclosure requirements with those of the Financial Accounting Standards Board. The 
standard sets out objectives to enhance disclosures about offsetting of financial assets and liabilities.

IFRS 10 replaces the consolidation requirements in IAS 27, Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements and SIC-12 
Consolidation – Special Purpose Entities. It provides a single model to be applied in the control analysis for all investees. 

IFRS  12  integrates  the  disclosure  requirements  on  interests  in  other  entities  and  requires  a  parent  company  to  disclose 
information about significant judgements and assumptions it has made in determining whether it has control, joint control, 
or  significant  influence  over  another  entity  and  the  type  of  joint  arrangement  when  the  arrangement  has  been  structured 
through a separate vehicle. An entity should also provide these disclosures when changes in facts and circumstances affect 
the entity’s conclusion during the reporting period. 

IFRS  13  replaces  the  fair  value  measurement  guidance  contained  in  individual  IFRS  with  a  single  source  of  fair  value 
measurement guidance. The standard clarifies the definition of fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value 
and sets out disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. 

The Second Cup Ltd. Annual Report 201350

Accounting standards not yet adopted
IFRS  9  replaces  the  guidance  in  IAS  39,  Financial  Instruments:  Recognition  and  Measurement  on  the  classification  and 
measurement of financial assets and financial liabilities. The standard eliminates the current categorization of financial assets. 
Financial  assets  will  be  categorized  at  inception  as  measured  at  amortized  cost  or  measured  at  fair  value.  Subsequent 
re-measurement of assets measured at fair value will be recognized in profit or loss. The mandatory effective date of this 
standard has been deferred and has not been determined.

The Company is in the process of determining the extent of the impact of these standards on its financial statements.

4. SHARE CAPITAL

Second Cup is authorized to issue an unlimited number of common shares. Common shares are classified as equity and 
have  $nil  par  value.  Incremental  costs  directly  attributable  to  the  issue  of  new  common  shares  are  shown  in  equity  as  a 
deduction, net of tax, from the proceeds.

5. MANAGEMENT OF CAPITAL

The  capital  structure  of  the  Company  consists  of  $11,089  (2012  -  $11,037)  in  Long-term  debt,  an  unused  but  available 
$2,000  operating  credit  facility,  and  $45,964  (2012  -  $56,700)  in  Shareholders’  equity,  which  comprises  share  capital, 
contributed surplus, and retained earnings (deficit).

The Company’s objectives relating to the management of its capital structure are to:
• safeguard its ability to continue as a going concern;
• maintain financial flexibility in order to preserve its ability to meet financial obligations;
• maintain a capital structure that provides financing options to the Company when the need arises to access capital;
• ensure it has sufficient cash and cash equivalents to pay declared dividends to its shareholders; and
• deploy capital to provide an adequate return to its shareholders.

The Company’s primary uses of capital are to finance increases in non-cash working capital and capital expenditures.

The Company determines the appropriate level of long-term debt in the context of its cash flows and overall business risks. 
The  Company  has  historically  generated  sufficient  cash  flows  to  pay  quarterly  dividends  to  its  shareholders.  In  order  to 
maintain or modify the capital structure, Second Cup may adjust the amount of dividends paid to its shareholders. 

Under the term loan and operating facility, the Company is required to comply with a number of covenants and restrictions, 
including  the  requirements  to  meet  certain  financial  ratios.  These  financial  ratios  are  discussed  in  note  15.  To  date,  the 
Company has complied with these ratios. There were no changes in the Company’s approach to capital management during 
the period.

6. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT

Financial instruments
The following summarizes the nature of certain risks applicable to the Company’s financial instruments:

Financial instrument 

Risks

Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents 
Trade and other receivables 
Notes and leases receivable 

Financial liabilities
Interest rate swap 
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 
Gift card liability 
Deposits from franchise partners 
Term loan  

Credit and interest rate
Credit
Credit

Credit, liquidity, and interest rate
Liquidity, currency, and commodity
Liquidity
Liquidity
Liquidity and interest rate

notes to the financial statements 
 
 
 
Fair value of financial instruments
The fair values of cash and cash equivalents, trade and other receivables, accounts payable and accrued liabilities and gift 
card liability approximate their carrying values due to their short-term maturity. The fair value of notes and leases receivable 
approximates their carrying value as the implicit interest used to discount the base value is considered to be based on an 
appropriate credit and risk rate pertaining to the debtor.

51

The fair value of the Company’s term loan approximates its carrying value less transaction costs due to the floating interest 
rate of the term loan. The following table summarizes the financial instruments measured at fair value:

Interest	rate	swap	
Opening fair value 
Additions during the period 
Realized during the period 
Change in value 
Closing fair value 

2013	
(96) 
(159) 
96 
19 
(140) 

$ 

$ 

2012			
(302)
-
-
206  
(96)        

$ 

$ 

Financial instruments that are measured subsequent to initial recognition at fair value are to be categorized in Levels 1 to 
3  in  the  fair  value  hierarchy,  based  on  the  degree  to  which  the  fair  value  is  observable.  The  three  levels  of  the  fair  value  
hierarchy are:
• Level 1 - inputs derived from quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
•  Level 2 - inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly (i.e., 

as prices) or indirectly (i.e., derived from prices); and

•  Level  3  -  fair  value  derived  from  valuation  techniques  that  include  inputs  for  the  asset  or  liability  that  are  not  based  on 

observable market data (unobservable inputs).

The fair value for the interest rate swap, classified as a Level 2, was derived using market valuation reports provided by a tier 
one Canadian bank.

As	at	December	29,	2012	
Interest rate swap 

As	at	December	28,	2013	
Interest rate swap 

Level	1	
- 

Level	1	
- 

$ 

$ 

Level	2	
(96) 

Level	2	
(140) 

$ 

$ 

	 Level	3															
-                
$ 

	 Level	3															
-             
$ 

There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 in the period.

Credit risk
a. Cash and cash equivalents, and interest rate swap
Credit risk associated with cash and cash equivalents, and the interest rate swap is managed by ensuring these assets are 
placed with institutions of high creditworthiness. 

b. Trade and other receivables, notes and leases receivable
The  Company’s  trade  and  other  receivables,  notes  and  lease  receivable  primarily  comprise  amounts  due  from  franchise 
partners.  Credit  risk  associated  with  these  receivables  is  mitigated  as  a  result  of  the  review  and  evaluation  of  franchise 
partner account balances beyond a particular age. Prior to accepting a franchise partner, the Company undertakes a detailed 
screening process which includes the requirement that a franchise partner has sufficient financing. The risk is further mitigated 
due to a broad franchise partner base that is spread across the country which limits the concentration of credit risk. 

Other receivables may include amounts owing from large organizations where often those organizations have a simultaneous 
vendor relationship with the Company’s franchise partners. Credit risk is mitigated as a result of the Company directing and 
maintaining certain controls over the vendor relationship with the franchise partners. 

Management  accounts  for  a  specific  bad  debt  provision  when  the  expected  recovery  is  less  than  the  actual  receivable.  
The bad debt expense is calculated on a specific identification basis.

The Second Cup Ltd. Annual Report 2013	
	
	
	
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
	
	
	
	
52

An analysis of aging of the Company’s trade and other receivables from billing date net of an allowance for doubtful accounts 
is as follows:

2013 
2012 

0-30	Days	
$  4,151 
4,324 

31-60	Days		
151 
138 

$ 

61-90	Days	
38 
121 

$ 

>	90	Days	
28 
$ 
33 

$ 

Total														
4,368
4,616

The Company’s trade and other receivables included a combined allowance for doubtful accounts of $663 (December 29, 
2012 - $223). Trade and other receivables are further discussed in note 7.

The payment maturity dates of the Company’s notes and leases receivable from December 28, 2013 net of an allowance for 
doubtful accounts are as follows:

2013 
2012 

<	90	Days	
57 
$ 
70 

90	Days	to	
<	1	year	
163 
195 

$ 

1	year	to	
<	2	years	
238 
$ 
229 

2	years	
and	after	
463 
$ 
512 

$ 

Total											
921
1,006

The Company’s notes and leases receivable included a combined allowance for doubtful accounts of $110 (December 29, 
2012 - $189). Notes and leases receivable are further discussed in note 8.

Liquidity risk
The  Company  manages  liquidity  risk  through  regular  monitoring  of  dividends,  forecast  and  actual  cash  flows,  monitoring 
maturity dates of financial assets and liabilities, and also the management of its capital structure and debt leverage ratios as 
outlined in note 15. The Company’s main source of income is royalty receipts from its franchise partners. 

Interest rate risk
The  Company’s  financial  instruments  exposed  to  interest  rate  risk  earn  and  bear  interest  at  floating  rates.  The  Company 
entered into an interest rate swap agreement to minimize risk on its long-term debt.

Interest  expense  on  the  term  loan  was  adjusted  to  include  the  payments  made  or  received  under  the  interest  rate  swap 
agreement.

Currency risk
The Company transacts with a small number of vendors that operate in foreign currencies. The Company believes that due to 
low volumes of transactions, low number of vendors, and low magnitude of spend, the impact of currency risk is not material. 

Commodity risk
The Company is directly and indirectly exposed to commodity market risk. The exposure relates to the changes in coffee 
commodity prices given it is a material input for the Company’s product offerings. The direct risk pertaining to Company-
operated cafés is not considered material given that there is a relatively small number of cafés. The direct exposure pertaining 
to the wholesale business is mitigated given that the Company has the ability to adjust its sales price if commodity prices rise 
over a threshold level. The indirect risk exists where franchise partner profitability may be impacted, thus potentially resulting 
in an impeded ability to collect accounts receivable or the need for other concessions to be made to the franchise partner. 
The Company mitigates this risk by entering fixed price purchase commitments through coffee commodity brokers and by 
having the ability to adjust retail selling prices.

Sensitivity analysis
The  Company  completes  an  assessment  of  sensitivity  of  its  financial  position  and  performance  to  changes  in  market 
variables, such as interest rates, as a result of changes in the fair value of cash flows associated with financial instruments. 
The sensitivity analysis provided discloses the effect on net income for the period ended December 28, 2013, assuming that 
a reasonably possible change in the relevant risk variable has occurred as at December 28, 2013.

notes to the financial statements	
 
 
 
 
 
	
	
	
 
 
 
 
 
The following table shows the Company’s exposure to interest rate risk and the pre-tax effects on net income (loss) for a full 
fiscal year of a 1% change in interest rates, which management believes is reasonably possible:

53

						Pre-tax	effects	on	net	income	(loss)	-	increase	(decrease)																																			

Liability	amount	
$  11,000 
140 

Term loan 
Interest rate swap 

7. TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES

Trade and other receivables 
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts  
Trade and other receivables - net  

1%	decrease	in	
interest	rates	
110 
(110) 
- 

$ 

$ 

1%	increase	in

$ 

interest	rates												
(110)
110           
-             

$ 

2013	
5,031 
(663) 
4,368 

$ 

$ 

2012												
4,839

(223)   
4,616           

$ 

$ 

During the period, the Company recorded $316 (2012 - $422) as bad debt expense pertaining to trade and other receivables. 

8. NOTES AND LEASES RECEIVABLE

Notes receivable - current 
Lease receivable - current 
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts - current  
Notes and leases receivable - current 

Notes receivable - long-term 
Lease receivable - long-term 
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts - long-term  
Notes and leases receivable 

	2013	

	2012										

$ 

$ 

229 
45 
(54) 
220 

421 
308 
(28) 
921 

$ 

$ 

314
27
(76) 
265

633
221
(113)  
1,006              

During the period, the Company recorded $nil (2012 - $nil) as bad debt expense pertaining to notes and leases receivable. 
The  Company  discounts  its  notes  and  leases  receivable  using  an  effective  discount  rate  ranging  between  eight  and  nine 
percent.

9. INVENTORIES

Merchandise held for resale 
Supplies  

Less: Provision for obsolete inventory 

2013	
133 
21 
154 
(31) 
123 

$ 

$ 

2012			
131

24              

155
(18) 
137           

$ 

$ 

During the period, the Company recorded $237 (2012 - $287) as inventory write-downs.

The Second Cup Ltd. Annual Report 2013	
	
	
	
 
 
 
 
 
 
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
54

10. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Net carrying value
As at December 31, 2011 
Cost 
Accumulated depreciation 
As at December 31, 2011 

Additions 
Disposals - original cost 
Disposals - accumulated depreciation 
Capitalized to lease 
Impairment charge (note 17) 
Depreciation 
As at December 29, 2012 

Cost 
Accumulated depreciation 
As at December 29, 2012 

Net carrying value
As at December 29, 2012 
Cost 
Accumulated depreciation 
As at December 29, 2012 

Additions 
Disposals - original cost 
Disposals - accumulated depreciation 
Capitalized to lease 
Impairment charge (note 17) 
Depreciation 
As at December 28, 2013 

Cost 
Accumulated depreciation 
As at December 28, 2013 

Leasehold	
improvements	

Equipment,
furniture,
fixtures	and	
other	

$  1,228 
(431) 
797 

851 
(177) 
20 
- 
(345) 
(200) 
946 

$ 

$  1,902 
(956) 
946 

$ 

$  1,902 
(956) 
946 

882 
(760) 
29 
- 
(299) 
(150) 
648 

$ 

$  1,725 
(1,077) 
648 

$ 

$  3,042 
(478) 
  2,564 

857 
(297) 
34 
(194) 
(17) 
(446) 
$  2,501 

$  3,408 
(907) 
$  2,501 

$  3,408 
(907) 
  2,501 

  1,118 
(249) 
17 
(143) 
- 
(516) 
$  2,728 

$  4,134 
  (1,406) 
$  2,728 

Computer	
hardware	

Total			

$ 

276 
(159) 
117 

$ 

4,546
(1,068) 
3,478

50 
- 
- 
- 
- 
(70) 
97 

326 
(229) 
97 

326 
(229) 
97 

117 
- 
- 
- 
- 
(83) 
131 

443 
(312) 
131 

1,758
(474)
54
(194)
(362)
(716) 
3,544               

5,636
(2,092) 
3,544                  

5,636
(2,092) 
3,544

2,117
(1,009)
46
(143)
(299)
(749) 
3,507               

6,302
(2,795) 
3,507                

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

notes to the financial statements	
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
11. INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Net carrying value
As at December 31, 2011 
Cost 
Accumulated amortization 
As at December 31, 2011 

Additions (acquired) 
Capitalized to lease 
Impairment charge (note 17) 
Amortization 
As at December 29, 2012 

Cost 
Accumulated amortization 
As at December 29, 2012 

Net carrying value 
As at December 29, 2012 
Cost 
Accumulated amortization 
As at December 29, 2012 

Additions (acquired) 
Disposals - original cost 
Disposals - accumulated
 amortization 
Capitalized to lease 
Impairment charge (note 17) 
Amortization 
As at December 28, 2013 

Cost 
Accumulated amortization 
As at December 28, 2013 

Trademarks	

Franchise	
rights	

Software	

Total			

55

$  86,905 
- 
  86,905 

- 
- 
  (12,850) 
- 
$  74,055 

$  74,055 
- 
$  74,055 

$  1,331 
(707) 
624 

- 
- 
- 
(283) 
341 

$ 

$  1,331 
(990) 
341 

$ 

$  74,055 
- 
  74,055 

$  1,331 
(990) 
341 

- 
- 

- 
- 
  (13,253) 
- 
$  60,802 

$  60,802 
- 
$  60,802 

- 
- 

- 
- 
- 
(283) 
58 

$ 

$  1,331 
  (1,273) 
58 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

574 
(165) 
409 

180 
(15) 
- 
(168) 
406 

739 
(333) 
406 

739 
(333) 
406 

787 
(123) 

41 
(22) 
- 
(219) 
870 

$  88,810

(872) 

  87,938

180
(15)
  (12,850)
(451) 
$  74,802              

$  76,125

(1,323) 
$  74,802            

$  76,125 
(1,323) 

  74,802

787
(123)

41
(22)
  (13,253)
(502) 
$  61,730          

1,381 
(511) 
870 

$  63,514

(1,784) 
$  61,730          

The Second Cup Ltd. Annual Report 2013	
	
	
	
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
56

12. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities consist of:

Accounts payable - trade 
Accrued salaries, wages, benefits, and incentives  
Sales tax payable 
Accrued liabilities 

13. PROVISIONS

As at December 31, 2011 

Provisions charged during the period  
Provisions utilized during the period 
As at December 29, 2012 

Current portion 
Long-term portion 
As at December 29, 2012 

As at December 29, 2012 

Provisions charged during the period  
Provisions utilized during the period 
As at December 28, 2013 

Current portion 
Long-term portion 
As at December 28, 2013 

2013	
1,953 
362 
335 
1,936 
4,586 

$ 

$ 

Headlease	
liabilities		
255 
$ 

Café	leases	
499 

$ 

- 
(46) 
209 

 82 
127 
209 

209 

- 
(81) 
128 

57 
71 
128 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

852 
(429) 
922 

366 
556 
922 

922 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

895 
(399) 
$  1,418 

$ 

412 
  1,006 
  1,418 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

Other	
- 

- 
- 
- 

- 
- 
- 

- 

681 
- 
681 

378 
303 
681 

2012			
1,280
577
235
1,031  
3,123      

Total						
754

852
(475) 
1,131     

448
683  
1,131     

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

1,131

$ 

$ 

1,576

(480) 
2,227     

847
1,380  
2,227      

The provisions for café leases are dependent on the individual circumstances specific to each lease or arrangement, such as 
lease settlement terms. Uncertainties exist in the amount of café lease related provisions where onerous arrangements exist 
with franchise partners that are continuously being re-evaluated and negotiated by management and thus the amount of 
provision may increase or decrease. The associated cash outflows pertaining to other provisions are substantially short term 
in nature and do not extend beyond two years. Headlease liabilities do not have any associated cash outflows.

notes to the financial statements	
	
	
	
	
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
	
	
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
14. OTHER LIABILITIES

Deferred revenue - current 
Leasehold inducements - current 
Other liabilities - current 
Deferred revenue - long-term 
Leasehold inducements - long-term 
Other liabilities 

Deferred revenue  
Leasehold inducements  
Other liabilities 

15. LONG-TERM DEBT

Face value of long-term debt 
Fair value of interest rate swap 
Unamortized transaction costs 

57

2012										
681

39  
720  
31
390  
1,141          

712
429  
1,141           

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

2012										

$  11,000
96
(59) 
$  11,037             

2013	
678 
39 
717 
47 
381 
1,145 

725 
420 
1,145 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

2013	
$  11,000 
140 
(51) 
$  11,089 

On September 26, 2013, the Company renegotiated its term loan and operating credit facilities, including an extension of the 
maturity of the credit facilities to September 30, 2016. The revised credit facilities are comprised of an $11,000 non-revolving 
term credit facility, fully drawn, and an undrawn $2,000 revolving operating credit facility. The term credit facilities are col-
lateralized by substantially all the assets of the Company. As a result of the renegotiated term loan, the Company recognized 
an additional $29 pertaining to transaction costs during 2013.

Pursuant to the terms of the Company’s operating credit facility and term loan, the Company is subject to certain financial 
and other customary covenants. 

The Company has requirements to maintain:
• a ratio of senior debt to EBITDA ratio (“Leverage Ratio”); 
•  a fixed charge coverage ratio;  

both of which are based on a trailing four-quarter basis; and 

•  a maximum amount of permitted distributions and purchases of the Company’s own stock based on a trailing cumulative 

EBITDA, plus a carry-forward legacy surplus of permitted distributions. 

During the periods ended December 28, 2013 and December 29, 2012, the Company was in compliance with all financial 
and other covenants of the Company’s operating credit facility and term loan. 

The $11,000 non-revolving term credit facility bears interest at the bankers’ acceptance (“BA”) rate plus a margin range of  
2.25% to 3.25% depending on the Company’s Leverage Ratio. As at December 28, 2013, the applicable margin pertaining 
to the aforementioned range is 2.75%. As at December 28, 2013, the full amount of the $11,000 non-revolving term credit 
facility was drawn.

The Second Cup Ltd. Annual Report 2013	
	
	
	
	
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
58

The $2,000 operating credit facility bears interest at the BA rate plus a range of 2.25% to 3.25% depending on the Company’s 
Leverage Ratio. As at December 28, 2013, the applicable margin pertaining to the aforementioned range is 2.75%. As at 
December 28, 2013, no advances had been drawn on this facility.

The Company had an interest rate swap agreement with a notional value of $11,000 that expired on April 1, 2013, which fixed 
the interest rate on the Company’s non-revolving term credit facility at 3.04% per annum plus the margin noted above, which 
resulted in a fixed effective interest rate of 5.79%. As at December 29, 2012, the balance of $96 was recorded as a liability. 

On September 30, 2013, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement with a notional value of $11,000 that 
expires on September 30, 2016. The swap fixed the interest rate on the Company’s non-revolving term credit facility at 2.07% 
per annum plus the margin noted above, which resulted in a fixed effective interest rate of 4.82%. 

16. OPERATING ExPENSES

Head office
Salaries, wages, benefits, and incentives 
Head office overheads  
Occupancy and lease costs 
Professional fees  
Research and innovation 
Bad debts and other (recovery) 
Depreciation of property and equipment 
Amortization of intangible assets  
Restructuring 

Company-operated cafés 
Occupancy and lease costs 
Other  
Depreciation of property and equipment  
(Gain) loss on disposal of capital related items 

$ 

2013	

6,866 
2,906 
1,756 
1,075 
550 
(161) 
566 
502 
883 
14,943 

1,187 
588 
183 
(197) 
1,761 
$  16,704 

$ 

2012										

6,540
2,306
1,614
1,150
476
709
506
451

-            
13,752            

885
500
210

70              
1,665   
$  15,417             

During the period, the Company realized $797 (2012 - $nil) in recoveries as a result of the change in estimate of the gift card 
breakage rate which is included in bad debts and other (recovery). The effect of such a change in estimate on future periods 
cannot be reasonably determined. The Company recorded $883 (2012 - $nil) of restructuring costs pertaining to the recon-
stitution of the board of directors and change in chief executive officers.

17. IMPAIRMENT CHARGES

a. Impairment of trademarks and goodwill
During the interim quarter ended June 29, 2013, the Company identified impairment indicators, which were primarily a result 
of the decline in its stock price and a decline in sales in comparison to internal projections.

The trademarks and goodwill were allocated fully to the franchising, distribution, and wholesale business CGU. The CGU’s 
recoverable amount has been determined using fair value less costs to sell.

notes to the financial statements	
	
	
	
	
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
Key assumptions
The discounted cash flow methodology uses estimates and assumptions that are sensitive to change and require judgement. 
This methodology used to test impairment is classified as Level 3 per the hierarchy described in note 6. These key judgements 
include  estimates  of  discount  rates,  forecast  growth  in  system  sales  and  other  estimates  impacting  future  cash  flows. 
Changes  in  these  estimates  and  assumptions  may  have  a  significant  impact  on  recoverable  amounts.  General  market 
uncertainty and the competitive operating environment for the Company and other similar retail entities were also factors 
taken into account in the analysis. The changes in the market growth rates reflect the current general economic pressures 
now impacting the national economy. 

The Company uses probability weighted cash flow projections based on financial forecasts covering a five-year period. 
These  projections  are  approved  by  the  board  of  directors  based  on  management  expectations  of  potential  outcomes. 
Cash  flows  beyond  the  five-year  period  are  extrapolated  using  the  estimated  growth  rates  stated  below.  The  following 
are key assumptions used in the fair value less costs to sell calculation where an impairment charge was incurred in the 
respective period:

59

Forecast same café sales 
Forecast system-wide café sales  
Average growth rate used to extrapolate cash flows  
    beyond the forecast period 
Discount rate 

2013	
-3.1% to 2.0% 
-0.8% to 4.8% 

2012												

-2.0% to 4.0%
-2.0% to 8.0%

2.0% 
11% to 13%  

2.0%
11.5%

The valuation of the franchising, distribution, and wholesale business CGU is based on probabilities assigned to forecasted 
cash  flows  and  includes  key  assumptions  above.  The  Company  recognized  an  impairment  charge  of  $13,253  (2012  - 
$12,850) to trademarks and $nil (2012 - $2,444) to goodwill. The carrying value of goodwill as at December 28, 2013 and 
December 29, 2012 was $nil with a corresponding accumulated impairment amount of $2,444 respectively.

The sensitivity analysis of a change in management’s key assumptions is reflected below: 

Key	assumption	
System sales of cafés 
Discount rate 
Incremental increase (decrease)  
    to impairment charges 

2013	

2012	

Low	growth	
-0.8% to 2.0% 
11.0% 

High	growth	
  -0.1% to 4.8% 
13.0% 

Low	growth	
0.0% to 2.0% 
11.0% 

High	growth									
3.0% to 7.3%
13.0%

$ 

2,130 

$ 

(7,842) 

$ 

1,796 

$ 

(5,749)

b. Impairment of leasehold improvements, equipment, furniture, fixtures, and other
Impairment indicators were identified when an individual Company-operated café was experiencing poor performance directly 
impacting  cash  flows.  The  Company  completes  its  impairment  analysis  based  on  historical  and  forecasted  performance 
measures  for  each  café  with  impairment  indicators.  The  asset’s  recoverable  amount  has  been  determined  using  value  in 
use. The recoverable amount was compared to the net book value of the assets. This methodology used to test impairment 
is  classified  as  Level  3  per  the  hierarchy  described  in  note  6.  As  a  result  of  the  impairment  test,  impairment  charges  of 
$299 (2012 - $362) were recorded to assets that were not able to be redeployed to a different CGU as the carrying amount 
exceeded the recoverable amount. A sensitivity of 2% increase or decrease in sales for each CGU pertaining to the impacted 
assets  would  not  have  had  an  impact  on  the  impairment  recorded.  The  impacted  assets  were  adjusted  to  a  carrying  
value of $nil.

The Second Cup Ltd. Annual Report 2013	
	
	
	
	
 
 
 
 
	
	
													
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
60

c. Summary of impairment charges

Trademarks 
Goodwill 
Leasehold improvements 
Equipment, furniture, fixtures and other 

18. INTEREST AND FINANCING

Interest expense 
Amortization of deferred financing costs 
Interest income  

19. INCOME TAxES (RECOVERY)

2013	
$  13,253 
- 
299 
- 
$  13,552 

2013	
566 
38 
(88) 
516 

$ 

$ 

2012	
$  12,850
2,444
345
17 
$  15,656 

2012										
482
82
(61)       
503          

$ 

$ 

Income  taxes  are  recognized  based  on  management’s  best  estimate  of  the  weighted  average  annual  income  tax  rate 
expected for the full financial year. Income taxes, as reported, differs from the amount that would be computed by applying 
the combined Canadian federal and provincial statutory income tax rates to income before income taxes. The reasons for 
the differences are as follows:

Loss before income taxes 
Combined Canadian federal and provincial tax rates 
Tax recovery at statutory rate 
Increased (reduced) by following differences
   Change in tax rates 
   Non-deductible permanent differences  
   Other 
Income taxes (recovery)  

Current income taxes 
Deferred income taxes (recovery)  
Income taxes (recovery) 

	2013	
$ 
(7,638) 
  26.51% 
(2,025) 

(3) 
1,749 
10 
(269) 

1,503 
(1,772) 
(269) 

$ 

$ 

$ 

The Company’s blended weighted average statutory income tax rate is aggregate of the following:

Basic federal rate 
Weighted average provincial rate 
Combined Canadian federal and provincial tax rates 

	2013	
%  15.00 
11.51 
  %  26.51 

2012													
$ 
(8,753)
  26.50%   
(2,320)

480
2,363

128           
651          

1,644

(993)     
651       

$ 

$ 

$ 

2012			

%  15.00

11.50         
%  26.50             

notes to the financial statements	
	
	
	
	
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The movement in deferred income tax (assets) and liabilities during the year is as follows:

61

As at December 31, 2011 
Charged (credited) to the income  
   statement 
As at December 29, 2012 
Charged (credited) to the income  
   statement 
As at December 28, 2013 

Property	and	
equipment	
1,147 

$ 

Trademarks	
9,349 

$ 

Intangible
assets	
158 

$ 

Other	
(471) 

$ 

Total				

$  10,183

391 
1,538 

(1,294) 
8,055 

266 
1,804 

$ 

(1,754) 
6,301 

$ 

$ 

(68) 
90 

(75) 
15 

(22) 
(493) 

(209) 
(702) 

(993)  

  9,190

  (1, 772)  
$  7,418                           

$ 

20. BASIC AND DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE

Loss per share is based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Basic and diluted loss 
per share is determined as follows:

Net loss 

Weighted average number of shares issued and outstanding 
Basic and diluted loss per share 

21. SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION

Changes in non-cash working capital (inflow (outflow)): 
Trade and other receivables  
Notes and leases receivable 
Inventories 
Prepaid expenses and other assets 
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 
Provisions 
Other liabilities 
Gift card liability 
Deposits from franchise partners 
Income taxes 

Cash payments for capital expenditures 
Purchase of property and equipment 
Purchase of intangible assets 

Supplementary information 
Interest paid 
Income taxes paid  

2013	
(7,369) 

$ 

2012																																

$ 

(9,404)

  9,903,045 
(0.74) 
$ 

  9,903,045                             
(0.95)                         
$ 

2013	

248 
248 
14 
505 
1,463 
1,212 
(65) 
(665) 
(602) 
(180) 
2,178 

(2,117) 
(787) 
(2,904) 

522 
1,687 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 
$ 

2012			

722
(400)
(58)
(501)
(780)
349
46
207
447
(1,191)                      
(1,159)                    

(1,758)

(180)                       
(1,938)                      

689
2,835

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 
$ 

The Second Cup Ltd. Annual Report 2013	
	
	
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
62

22. ContingenCies, Commitments and guarantees

Second Cup has lease commitments for Company-operated cafés and acts as the head tenant on most leases, which it in 
turn subleases to franchise partners. To the extent the Company may be required to make rent payments due to headlease 
commitments, a provision has been recognized (note 13). The Company’s lease commitments at December 28, 2013 are 
as follows:

December 28, 2014 
December 28, 2015 
December 28, 2016 
December 28, 2017 
December 28, 2018 
Thereafter 

Headlease 
commitments 
  $  19,627 
  18,328 
  16,254 
  14,222 
  12,159 
  32,694 
  $  113,284 

$ 

Sublease to 
franchisees 
18,144 
17,004 
15,033 
13,030 
11,076 
29,142 
$  103,429 

Net  

$  1,483
  1,324
  1,221
  1,192
  1,083
  3,552                
$  9,855                  

The Company believes it will have sufficient resources to meet the net commitment of $9,855.

Second Cup is involved in litigation and other claims arising in the normal course of business. Management must use its 
judgement to determine whether or not a claim has any merit, the amount of the claim and whether to record a provision, 
which is dependent on the potential success of the claim. Second Cup believes it will not incur any significant loss or expense 
with such claims. However, there can be no assurance that unforeseen circumstances will not result in significant costs. The 
outcome of these actions is not determinable at this time, and adjustments, if any, will be recorded in the period of settlement.

The Coffee “C” contract is the world benchmark for Arabica coffee. The contract prices physical delivery of exchange grade 
green beans from one of 19 countries of origin in a licensed warehouse to one of several ports in the U.S. and Europe, with 
stated  premiums/discounts.  Second  Cup  sources  high  altitude  Arabica  coffee  which  tends  to  trade  at  a  premium  above 
the “C” coffee commodity price. Second Cup has contracts with third party companies to purchase the coffee that is sold 
in all Second Cup cafés. In terms of these supply agreements, Second Cup has guaranteed a minimum volume of coffee 
purchases of $5,621 USD (2012 - $4,421 USD) during fiscal 2014. The coffee purchase commitment is comprised of three 
components: unapplied futures commitment contracts, fixed price physical contracts and flat price physical contracts. 

Second Cup has entered into a distribution agreement and has partnered with a vendor to wholesale its product through 
grocery and other retail outlets across Canada. As a result of the distribution agreement, the Company is required to pay a 
portion of one-time listing fees in the amount of up to $1,050 in 2014.

Second Cup is the primary coordinator of café construction costs on behalf its franchise partners and for Company-operated 
cafés.  As  at  December  28,  2013,  there  is  $1,433  of  contractual  commitments  pertaining  to  construction  costs  for  new 
locations  and  renovations.  The  Company  finances  construction  costs  for  franchise  projects  from  deposits  received  from 
franchise partners and corporate projects from the Company’s cash flows.

23. related parties

The Company has identified related parties as key management, members of the board of directors, and shareholders that 
effectively exercise significant influence on the Company. Such related parties include any entities acting with or on behalf of 
the aforementioned parties. 

notes to the financial statements 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
In 2013, the Company incurred a total of $153 in legal expenditures incurred on behalf of shareholders and related companies 
with respect to the reconstitution of the board of directors. These items were recorded at their exchange amount as restruc-
turing expenses (note 16).

63

Compensation of key management
Key  management  is  defined  as  the  senior  management  team  and  the  Board  of  Directors.  The  following  summarizes  the 
compensation expense of key management personnel and the composition thereof: 

Salaries and short-term employee benefits 
Termination costs  
Share-based compensation  
Total compensation 

2013	
1,875 
681 
185 
2,741 

$ 

$ 

2012			
2,139
-
170  
2,309                

$ 

$ 

24. LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN AND DIRECTORS’ DEFERRED SHARE UNIT PLAN

The  fair  value  of  the  units  outstanding  is  determined  based  on  the  market  value  of  the  underlying  common  shares  of  
the Company. 

A summary of the status of the Company’s long-term incentive plan is presented below:

Notional units outstanding as at December 31, 2011 
Units forfeited 
Units paid out 
Units granted in lieu of dividends 
Change in fair value 
Notional units outstanding as at December 29, 2012 

Expensed in the period 

Notional units outstanding as at December 29, 2012 
Units forfeited 
Units paid out 
Units granted in lieu of dividends 
Change in fair value 
Notional units outstanding as at December 28, 2013 

Expensed in the period 

Notional	units	
88,763 
(3,723) 
(32,682) 
6,205 

58,563 

Notional	units	
58,563 
(3,770) 
(29,857) 
4,936 

29,872 

Recorded	value														

$ 

$ 

$ 

418
(19)
(175)
41
(9)  
256                      

130              

Recorded	value			

$ 

$ 

$ 

256
(16)
(138)
22
(3) 
121                 

61             

The weighted average price of units granted in lieu of dividends was $4.51 (2012 - $6.83).

The Second Cup Ltd. Annual Report 2013	
	
	
	
	
 
 
 
 
	
	
	
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
	
	
	
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
64

A summary of the status of the Company’s directors’ deferred share unit plan is presented below:

Notional units outstanding as at December 31, 2011 
Deferred units granted 
Units granted in lieu of dividends 
Change in fair value 
Notional units outstanding as at December 29, 2012 

Expensed in the period 

Notional units outstanding as at December 29, 2012 
Deferred units granted 
Units granted in lieu of dividends 
Change in fair value 
Notional units outstanding as at December 28, 2013 

Expensed in the period 

Notional	units	
14,398 
9,018 
1,760 

25,176 

Notional	units	
25,176 
30,820 
2,487 

58,483 

Recorded	value		

$ 

$ 

$ 

89
55
12
(27) 
129                 

40                

Recorded	value			

$ 

$ 

$ 

129
157
11
(44) 
253                 

124               

The  weighted  average  price  of  deferred  units  granted  combined  with  units  granted  in  lieu  of  dividends  was  $5.01  
(2012 - $6.22).

25. SUBSEQUENT EVENT

On  March  7,  2014  the  Board  of  Directors  of  Second  Cup  approved  a  quarterly  dividend  of  $0.085  per  common  share, 
payable on March 28, 2014 to shareholders of record at the close of business on March 21, 2014.

notes to the financial statements	
	
	
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
	
	
	
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The Second Cup Ltd.

 shAreholder InForMAtIon

65

CORPORATE HEAD OFFICE 

THE SECOND CUP LTD.
Board of Directors

THE SECOND CUP LTD.
Senior Management Team

Michael Bregman (1) (2)
Chairman

Alix Box
Stephen Kelley (1)
Alton McEwen (2)
Rael Merson (1)
Alan Simpson (2)

Committees of the Board
(1) Audit Committee
(2)  Governance, Human 

Resources and 
Compensation Committee

Alix Box 
President and
Chief Executive Officer

Steve Boyack
Vice President, Finance and Chief 
Financial Officer

Dan Caldarone
Vice President, General Counsel and 
Corporate Secretary

Rita Toporowski
Vice President, Corporate Planning 
and Development

Wayne Vanderhorst
Vice President, Franchise 
Development

Tom Zacharias
Vice President, Operations

The Second Cup Ltd.
6303 Airport Road
2nd Floor
Mississauga, Ontario
Canada  L4V 1R8 

Registrar and Transfer Agent
Computershare Trust Company 
of Canada

Auditors
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Market Information
Shares Listed: 
Toronto Stock Exchange
Symbol: SCU

Investor Enquiries
Steve Boyack
Chief Financial Officer
Tel: (905) 362-1818  
Fax: (905) 362-1121
E-mail: investor@secondcup.com

Website: 
www.secondcup.com

The Second Cup Ltd. Annual Report 2013 
66

A
n
n
u
A
l
r
e
p
o
r
t
2
0
1
3

t
h
e
s
e
c
o
n
d
c
u
p
l
t
d

.

Printed on environmentally-
responsible paper that contains 
FSC certified 50% post-
consumer and 50% virgin fiber.