Seacoast Banking of Florida
Annual Report 2019

Download report
Bookmark report

More annual reports from Seacoast Banking of Florida:

2023 Report
2022 Report
2021 Report
2020 Report
2019 Report

Peers and competitors of Seacoast Banking of Florida:

DNB Financial Corporation
Sandy Spring Bancorp
Freedom Bank of Virginia
The Community Financial Corporation
Severn Bancorp Inc.

Plain-text annual report

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC 20549 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from _______ to _________ Commission File No. 0-13660 Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter) Florida (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) 59-2260678 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 815 Colorado Avenue, Stuart FL (Address of Principal Executive Offices) 34994 (Zip Code) (772) 287-4000 (Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Trading Symbol(s) Name of each exchange on which registered Common Stock SBCF NASDAQ Global Select Market Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None. Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes No Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company”, and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Yes No Large accelerated filer Non-accelerated filer Accelerated filer Smaller reporting company Emerging growth company If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes No The aggregate market value of Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida common stock, par value $0.10 per share, held by non- affiliates, computed by reference to the price at which the stock was last sold on June 30, 2019, as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market, was $1,309,158,096. The number of shares outstanding of Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida common stock, par value $0.10 per share, as of January 31, 2020, was 51,523,499. DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE Certain portions of the registrant’s Proxy Statement for the 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “2020 Proxy Statement”) are incorporated by reference into Part III, Items 10 through 14 of this report. Other than those portions of the 2020 Proxy Statement specifically incorporated by reference herein pursuant to Items 10 through 14, no other portions of the 2020 Proxy Statement shall be deemed so incorporated. Part I Part II Part III Part IV TABLE OF CONTENTS Item 1. Business Item 1A. Risk Factors Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments Item 2. Properties Item 3. Legal Proceedings Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures Item 5. Market For Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities Item 6. Selected Financial Data Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure Item 9A. Controls and Procedures Item 9B. Other Information Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance Item 11. Executive Compensation Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules Item 16. Form 10-K Summary 2 5 5 15 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 31 56 77 130 130 130 131 131 131 131 131 132 132 132 135 SPECIAL CAUTIONARY NOTICE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS Certain statements made or incorporated by reference herein which are not statements of historical fact, including those under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and elsewhere herein, are “forward- looking statements” within the meaning and protections of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Forward-looking statements include statements with respect to the Company's beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, expectations, anticipations, assumptions, estimates, intentions and future performance, and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may be beyond the Company's control, and which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida (“Seacoast” or the “Company”) or its wholly-owned banking subsidiary, Seacoast National Bank ("Seacoast Bank") to be materially different from those set forth in the forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical fact could be forward-looking statements. You can identify these forward-looking statements through the use of words such as "may", "will", "anticipate", "assume", "should", "support", "indicate", "would", "believe", "contemplate", "expect", "estimate", "continue", "further", "plan", "point to", "project", "could", "intend", "target" or other similar words and expressions of the future. These forward-looking statements may not be realized due to a variety of factors, including, without limitation: • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • the effects of future economic and market conditions, including seasonality; governmental monetary and fiscal policies, including interest rate policies of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve ("Federal Reserve"), as well as legislative, tax and regulatory changes; changes in accounting policies, rules and practices; the risks of changes in interest rates on the level and composition of deposits, loan demand, liquidity and the values of loan collateral, securities, and interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities; interest rate risks, sensitivities and the shape of the yield curve; uncertainty related to the impact of LIBOR calculations on securities, loans and debt; changes in borrower credit risks and payment behaviors; changes in the availability and cost of credit and capital in the financial markets; changes in the prices, values and sales volumes of residential and commercial real estate; the Company's ability to comply with any regulatory requirements; the effects of problems encountered by other financial institutions that adversely affect Seacoast or the banking industry; Seacoast's concentration in commercial real estate loans; the failure of assumptions and estimates, as well as differences in, and changes to, economic, market and credit conditions; the impact on the valuation of Seacoast's investments due to market volatility or counterparty payment risk; statutory and regulatory dividend restrictions; increases in regulatory capital requirements for banking organizations generally; the risks of mergers, acquisitions and divestitures, including Seacoast's ability to continue to identify acquisition targets and successfully acquire desirable financial institutions; changes in technology or products that may be more difficult, costly, or less effective than anticipated; the Company's ability to identify and address increased cybersecurity risks; inability of Seacoast's risk management framework to manage risks associated with the business; dependence on key suppliers or vendors to obtain equipment or services for the business on acceptable terms; reduction in or the termination of Seacoast's ability to use the mobile-based platform that is critical to the Company's business growth strategy; the effects of war or other conflicts, acts of terrorism, natural disasters or other catastrophic events that may affect general economic conditions; unexpected outcomes of, and the costs associated with, existing or new litigation involving the Company; Seacoast's ability to maintain adequate internal controls over financial reporting; potential claims, damages, penalties, fines and reputational damage resulting from pending or future litigation, regulatory proceedings and enforcement actions; 3 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • the risks that deferred tax assets could be reduced if estimates of future taxable income from operations and tax planning strategies are less than currently estimated and sales of capital stock could trigger a reduction in the amount of net operating loss carryforwards that the Company may be able to utilize for income tax purposes; the effects of competition from other commercial banks, thrifts, mortgage banking firms, consumer finance companies, credit unions, securities brokerage firms, insurance companies, money market and other mutual funds and other financial institutions operating in the Company's market areas and elsewhere, including institutions operating regionally, nationally and internationally, together with such competitors offering banking products and services by mail, telephone, computer and the Internet; the failure of assumptions underlying the establishment of reserves for possible loan losses, including risks associated with the adoption of new accounting guidance for credit losses in 2020. the risks relating to the proposed First Bank of the Palm Beaches and Fourth Street Banking Company mergers including, without limitation: the timing to consummate the proposed mergers; the risk that a condition to closing of the proposed mergers may not be satisfied; the risk that a regulatory approval that may be required for the proposed mergers is not obtained or is obtained subject to conditions that are not anticipated; the diversion of management time on issues related to the proposed mergers; unexpected transaction costs, including the costs of integrating operations; the risks that the businesses will not be integrated successfully or that such integration may be more difficult, time- consuming or costly than expected; the potential failure to fully or timely realize expected revenues and revenue synergies, including as the result of revenues following the mergers being lower than expected; the risk of deposit and customer attrition; any changes in deposit mix; unexpected operating and other costs, which may differ or change from expectations; the risks of customer and employee loss and business disruptions, including, without limitation, the results of difficulties in maintaining relationships with employees; the inability to grow the customer and employee base; increased competitive pressures and solicitations of customers by competitors; the difficulties and risks inherent with entering new markets; and other factors and risks described under “Risk Factors” herein and in any of the Company's subsequent reports filed with the SEC and available on its website at www.sec.gov. All written or oral forward-looking statements that are made or are attributable to Seacoast are expressly qualified in their entirety by this cautionary notice. The Company assumes no obligation to update, revise or correct any forward-looking statements that are made from time to time, either as a result of future developments, new information or otherwise, except as may be required by law. 4 Part I Item 1. Business General Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida (“Seacoast” or the “Company”) is a financial holding company, incorporated in Florida in 1983, and registered under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the “BHC Act”). Its principal subsidiary is Seacoast National Bank, a wholly-owned national banking association (“Seacoast Bank”). Seacoast Bank commenced its operations in 1933, and operated as “First National Bank & Trust Company of the Treasure Coast” prior to 2006 when its name was changed to “Seacoast National Bank.” As of December 31, 2019, the Company’s legal structure also includes seven trusts formed for the purpose of issuing trust preferred securities and a wholly-owned domestic corporation, Seacoast Insurance Services, Inc., which provides Seacoast Bank customers with access to a range of insurance products. Seacoast Bank has three wholly-owned subsidiaries. Through one of these subsidiaries, Seacoast Bank has a controlling interest in a real estate investment trust (“REIT”). Unrelated investors own a noncontrolling interest in the preferred stock of the REIT. As of December 31, 2019, Seacoast had total consolidated assets of approximately $7.1 billion, total deposits of approximately $5.6 billion, total consolidated liabilities, including deposits, of approximately $6.1 billion and consolidated shareholders’ equity of approximately $1.0 billion. Operations are discussed in more detail under “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Consolidated Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” The Company's principal offices are located at 815 Colorado Avenue, Stuart, Florida 34994, and the telephone number at that address is (772) 287-4000. The Company and Seacoast Bank maintain Internet websites at www.seacoastbanking.com and www.seacoastbank.com, respectively. The information on these websites is not part of this report, and neither of these websites nor the information appearing on these websites is included or incorporated in this report. Seacoast makes available, free of charge on its corporate website, its Annual Report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10- Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. Proposed Mergers with First Bank of the Palm Beaches and Fourth Street Banking Company First Bank of the Palm Beaches On November 19, 2019, Seacoast announced that Seacoast and Seacoast Bank had entered into an agreement and plan of merger with First Bank of the Palm Beaches (“First Bank”). Pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement, First Bank, headquartered in West Palm Beach, will be merged with and into Seacoast Bank. Organized in 2006, First Bank has deposits of approximately $172 million and loans of $150 million and the merger will increase Seacoast’s deposits in Palm Beach County by 25% to approximately $821 million. Seacoast plans to add First Bank’s two branches to the six it currently operates in the market. Seacoast entered the county in 2003 and then expanded by acquiring Grand Bankshares, Inc. in 2015 and Palm Beach Community Bank in 2017. Closing of the First Bank acquisition is expected late in the first quarter of 2020 after receipt of approvals from regulatory authorities, the approval of First Bank shareholders and the satisfaction of other customary closing conditions. Fourth Street Banking Company On January 23, 2020, Seacoast announced that Seacoast and Seacoast Bank had entered into an agreement and plan of merger with Fourth Street Banking Company (“Fourth Street”) and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Freedom Bank. Pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement, Fourth Street, headquartered in St. Petersburg, will be merged with and into Seacoast and Freedom Bank will be merged with and into Seacoast Bank. Organized in 2005, Freedom Bank has deposits of approximately $276 million and loans of $249 million and the merger will increase Seacoast’s deposits in the Tampa MSA by 87% to approximately $679 million. Seacoast plans to add Freedom Bank’s two branches to the four it currently operates in the market. Seacoast entered the Tampa MSA with the acquisitions of GulfShore Bank and NorthStar Bank in 2017. Closing of the Fourth Street acquisition is expected in the second quarter of 2020 after receipt of approvals from regulatory authorities, the approval of Fourth Street shareholders and the satisfaction of other customary closing conditions. 5 Additional Information Seacoast has filed a registration statement on Form S-4 with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) in connection with the proposed merger of First Bank with and into Seacoast Bank and will file a registration statement on Form S-4 with the SEC in connection with the proposed merger of Fourth Street with and into Seacoast and Freedom Bank with and into Seacoast Bank. The registration statement in connection with the First Bank merger includes a proxy statement of First Bank and a prospectus of Seacoast and the registration statement in connection with the Fourth Street merger will include a proxy statement of Fourth Street and a prospectus of Seacoast. A definitive proxy statement/prospectus has been mailed to shareholders of First Bank and will be mailed to shareholders of Fourth Street. This communication does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any securities or a solicitation of any vote or approval. WE URGE INVESTORS TO READ THE PROXY STATEMENTS/PROSPECTUSES AND ANY OTHER DOCUMENTS TO BE FILED WITH THE SEC IN CONNECTION WITH THE MERGERS OR INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE IN THE PROXY STATEMENTS/ PROSPECTUSES BECAUSE THEY WILL CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION. Investors may obtain (when available) these documents free of charge at the SEC’s Web site (www.sec.gov). In addition, documents filed with the SEC by Seacoast will be available free of charge by contacting Investor Relations at (772) 288-6085. First Bank and Fourth Street, their directors, and executive officers and other members of management and employees may be considered participants in the solicitation of proxies in connection with the proposed mergers of First Bank with and into Seacoast Bank and Fourth Street with and into Seacoast. Information regarding the participants in the proxy solicitation of First Bank and a description of their direct and indirect interests, by security holdings or otherwise, is contained in the proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant materials to be filed with the SEC. Information regarding the participants in the proxy solicitation of Fourth Street and a description of their direct and indirect interests, by security holdings or otherwise, will be contained in the proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant materials to be filed with the SEC. Expansion of Market, Products and Services Seacoast has grown to be one of the largest community banks headquartered in Florida. This growth has been achieved through a balanced strategy consisting of organic growth and acquisitions focused on the state's most attractive markets. The Company provides integrated financial services including commercial and retail banking, wealth management and mortgage services to customers through advanced banking solutions and Seacoast Bank's network of 48 traditional branches and nine commercial banking centers. Seacoast operates primarily in Florida, with concentrations in the state's fastest growing markets, each with unique characteristics and opportunities. Seacoast Bank customers can also access their account information and perform transactions online, through mobile applications, or through Seacoast Bank's telephone customer support center, which offers extended hours. These options, combined with a traditional branch footprint, meet a broad range of customer needs. During 2019, the Company added business bankers across key MSAs, invested in technology to improve banker productivity and to enhance customer self service. Seacoast has continued to expand digital offerings to provide an improved customer experience and lower the cost to serve. As more customers adopt these channels, transactions have shifted from the traditional branch network to digital banking. This combination allows Seacoast to serve the ever changing needs of its customer base. Seacoast Bank also provides brokerage and annuity services. Seacoast Bank personnel managing the sale of these services are dual employees with LPL Financial, the company through which Seacoast Bank presently conducts brokerage and annuity services. In 2018, the Company established Seacoast Insurance Services, Inc., providing customers with access to a range of insurance products. Seacoast has in recent years sought to complement organic growth with the acquisition of financial institutions that complement the Company's strategy and expand its ability to serve customers in Florida's key markets. Since 2014, Seacoast has acquired eight institutions that have enhanced the Company's presence in the strongest and fastest growing MSAs in Florida. In addition, the Company expects to complete two acquisitions in the Palm Beach and Tampa MSAs during the first half of 2020. Employees As of December 31, 2019, the Company and its subsidiaries employed 867 full-time equivalent employees. The Company considers employee relations to be favorable and has no collective bargaining agreements with any employees. 6 Seasonality; Cycles Seacoast believes banking operations are somewhat seasonal in nature. Investment management fees and deposits often peak in the first and second quarters and often are lowest in the third quarter. Transactional fees from merchants and ATM and debit card use also typically peak in the first and second quarters. Public deposits tend to increase with tax collections in the first and fourth quarters and decline as a result of spending thereafter. Commercial and residential real estate activity, demand, prices and sales volumes are less seasonal and vary based on economic conditions, interest rates and credit availability. Competition Seacoast operates in a highly competitive market. Competitors include other banks, credit unions, mortgage companies, personal and commercial financing companies, investment brokerage and advisory firms, mutual fund companies and insurance companies. Competitors range in both size and geographic footprint. Seacoast operates throughout Florida from the southeast, including Fort Lauderdale, Boca Raton and Palm Beach north along the east coast to the Daytona area, into Orlando and Central Florida and the adjacent Tampa market, and west to Okeechobee and surrounding counties. Seacoast Bank's competition includes not only other banks of comparable or larger size in the same markets, but also various other nonbank financial institutions, including savings and loan associations, credit unions, mortgage companies, personal and commercial financial companies, peer to peer lending businesses, investment brokerage and financial advisory firms and mutual fund companies. Seacoast Bank competes for deposits, commercial, fiduciary and investment services and various types of loans and other financial services. Seacoast Bank also competes for interest-bearing funds with a number of other financial intermediaries, including brokerage and insurance firms, as well as investment alternatives, including mutual funds, governmental and corporate bonds, and other securities. Continued consolidation and rapid technological changes within the financial services industry will likely change the nature and intensity of competition, but also will create opportunities for the Company to demonstrate and leverage its competitive advantages. Competitors include not only financial institutions based in Florida, but also a number of large out-of-state and foreign banks, bank holding companies and other financial institutions that have an established market presence in Florida or that offer internet- based products. Many of the Company's competitors are engaged in local, regional, national and international operations and have greater assets, personnel and other resources. Some of these competitors are subject to less regulation and/or more favorable tax treatment. Many of these institutions have greater resources, broader geographic markets and higher lending limits, and may offer services that the Company does not offer. In addition, these institutions may be able to better afford and make broader use of media advertising, support services, and electronic and other technology. To offset these potential competitive disadvantages, the Company depends on its reputation for superior service, ability to make credit and other business decisions quickly, and the delivery of an integrated distribution of traditional branches and bankers, with digital technology. Supervision and Regulation The Company is extensively regulated under federal and state law. The following is a brief summary that does not purport to be a complete description of all regulations that affect the Company or all aspects of those regulations. This discussion is qualified in its entirety by reference to the particular statutory and regulatory provisions described below and is not intended to be an exhaustive description of the statutes or regulations applicable to the Company’s and Seacoast Bank’s business. In addition, proposals to change the laws and regulations governing the banking industry are frequently raised at both the state and federal levels. The likelihood and timing of any changes in these laws and regulations, and the impact such changes may have on the Company and Seacoast Bank, are difficult to predict. In addition, bank regulatory agencies may issue enforcement actions, policy statements, interpretive letters and similar written guidance applicable to the Company or Seacoast Bank. Changes in applicable laws, regulations or regulatory guidance, or their interpretation by regulatory agencies or courts may have a material adverse effect on the Company and Seacoast Bank’s business, operations, and earnings. Supervision and regulation of banks, their holding companies and affiliates is intended primarily for the protection of depositors and customers, the Deposit Insurance Fund (“DIF”) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), and the U.S. banking and financial system rather than holders of the Company's capital stock. 7 Regulation of the Company The Company is registered as a bank holding company with the Federal Reserve under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the “BHC Act”) and has elected to be a financial holding company. As such, the Company is subject to comprehensive supervision and regulation by the Federal Reserve and to its regulatory reporting requirements. Federal law subjects financial holding companies, such as Seacoast, to particular restrictions on the types of activities in which they may engage, and to a range of supervisory requirements and activities, including regulatory enforcement actions for violations of laws and regulations. Violations of laws and regulations, or other unsafe and unsound practices, may result in regulatory agencies imposing fines or penalties, cease and desist orders, or taking other enforcement actions. Under certain circumstances, these agencies may enforce these remedies directly against officers, directors, employees and other parties participating in the affairs of a bank or bank holding company. Activity Limitations: As a financial holding company, Seacoast is permitted to engage directly or indirectly in a broader range of activities than those permitted for a bank holding company. Bank holding companies are generally restricted to engaging in the business of banking, managing or controlling banks and certain other activities determined by the Federal Reserve to be closely related to banking. Financial holding companies may also engage in activities that are considered to be financial in nature, as well as those incidental or, if so determined by the Federal Reserve, complementary to financial activities. The Company and Seacoast Bank must each remain “well-capitalized” and “well-managed” and Seacoast Bank must receive a Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”) rating of at least “Satisfactory” at its most recent examination in order for the Company to maintain its status as a financial holding company. In addition, the Federal Reserve has the power to order a financial holding company or its subsidiaries to terminate any nonbanking activity or terminate its ownership or control of any nonbank subsidiary, when it has reasonable cause to believe that continuation of such activity or such ownership or control constitutes a serious risk to the financial safety, soundness, or stability of any bank subsidiary of that financial holding company. As further described below, each of the Company and Seacoast Bank is well-capitalized as of December 31, 2019, and Seacoast Bank has a rating of “Outstanding” in its most recent CRA evaluation. Source of Strength Obligations: A financial holding company is required to act as a source of financial and managerial strength to its subsidiary bank and to maintain resources adequate to support its bank. The term “source of financial strength” means the ability of a company, such as Seacoast, that directly or indirectly owns or controls an insured depository institution, such as Seacoast Bank, to provide financial assistance to such insured depository institution in the event of financial distress. The appropriate federal banking agency for the depository institution (in the case of Seacoast Bank, this agency is the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the “OCC”)) may require reports from the Company to assess its ability to serve as a source of strength and to enforce compliance with the source of strength requirements and require the Company to provide financial assistance to Seacoast Bank in the event of financial distress. Acquisitions: The BHC Act permits acquisitions of banks by bank holding companies, such that Seacoast and any other bank holding company, whether located in Florida or elsewhere, may acquire a bank located in any other state, subject to certain deposit- percentages, age of bank charter requirements, and other restrictions. The BHC Act requires that a bank holding company obtain the prior approval of the Federal Reserve before (i) acquiring direct or indirect ownership or control of more than 5% of the voting shares of any additional bank or bank holding company, (ii) taking any action that causes an additional bank or bank holding company to become a subsidiary of the bank holding company, or (iii) merging or consolidating with any other bank holding company. The Federal Reserve may not approve any such transaction that would result in a monopoly or would be in furtherance of any combination or conspiracy to monopolize or attempt to monopolize the business of banking in any section of the United States, or the effect of which may be substantially to lessen competition or to tend to create a monopoly in any section of the country, or that in any other manner would be in restraint of trade, unless the anticompetitive effects of the proposed transaction are clearly outweighed by the public interest in meeting the convenience and needs of the community to be served. The Federal Reserve is also required to consider: (1) the financial and managerial resources of the companies involved, including pro forma capital ratios; (2) the risk to the stability of the United States banking or financial system; (3) the convenience and needs of the communities to be served, including performance under the CRA; and (4) the effectiveness of the companies in combating money laundering. Change in Control: Federal law restricts the amount of voting stock of a bank holding company or a bank that a person may acquire without the prior approval of banking regulators. Under the federal Change in Bank Control Act and the regulations thereunder, a person or group must give advance notice to the Federal Reserve before acquiring control of any bank holding company, such as Seacoast, and the OCC before acquiring control of any national bank, such as Seacoast Bank. Upon receipt of such notice, the bank regulatory agencies may approve or disapprove the acquisition. The Change in Bank Control Act creates a rebuttable presumption of control if a member or group acquires a certain percentage or more of a bank holding company’s or bank’s voting stock. As a result, a person or entity generally must provide prior notice to the Federal Reserve before acquiring the power to vote 10% or more of the Company's outstanding common stock. The overall effect of such laws is to make it more difficult to acquire 8 a bank holding company and a bank by tender offer or similar means than it might be to acquire control of another type of corporation. Consequently, shareholders of the Company may be less likely to benefit from the rapid increases in stock prices that may result from tender offers or similar efforts to acquire control of other companies. Investors should be aware of these requirements when acquiring shares of the Company's stock. Governance and Financial Reporting Obligations: Seacoast is required to comply with various corporate governance and financial reporting requirements under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as rules and regulations adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the “PCAOB”), and the NASDAQ stock exchange. In particular, the Company is required to include management and independent registered public accounting firm reports on internal controls as part of its Annual Report on Form 10-K in order to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. The Company has evaluated its controls, including compliance with the SEC rules on internal controls, and has and expects to continue to spend significant amounts of time and money on compliance with these rules. Failure to comply with these internal control rules may materially adversely affect the Company's reputation, its ability to obtain the necessary certifications to financial statements, and the value of the Company's securities. The assessments of the Company's financial reporting controls as of December 31, 2019 are included in this report under “Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.” Corporate Governance: The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) addresses many investor protection, corporate governance, and executive compensation matters that affect most U.S. publicly traded companies. The Dodd-Frank Act: (1) grants shareholders of U.S. publicly traded companies an advisory vote on executive compensation; (2) enhances independence requirements for Compensation Committee members; and (3) requires companies listed on national securities exchanges to adopt incentive-based compensation claw-back policies for executive officers. Incentive Compensation: The Dodd-Frank Act requires the banking agencies and the SEC to establish joint rules or guidelines for financial institutions with more than $1 billion in assets, which prohibit incentive compensation arrangements that the agencies determine to encourage inappropriate risks by the institution. The banking agencies issued proposed rules in 2011 and issued guidance on sound incentive compensation policies. In 2016, the Federal Reserve and the OCC also proposed rules that would, depending upon the assets of the institution, directly regulate incentive compensation arrangements and would require enhanced oversight and recordkeeping. As of December 31, 2019, these rules have not been implemented. The Company and Seacoast Bank have undertaken efforts to ensure that their incentive compensation plans do not encourage inappropriate risks, consistent with three key principles: that incentive compensation arrangements should appropriately balance risk and financial rewards, be compatible with effective controls and risk management, and be supported by strong corporate governance. Shareholder Say-On-Pay Votes: The Dodd-Frank Act requires public companies to provide shareholders with an advisory vote on executive compensation (known as say-on-pay votes), the frequency of a say-on-pay vote, and the golden parachutes available to executives in connection with change-in-control transactions. Public companies must give shareholders the opportunity to vote on say-on-pay proposals at least every three years and the opportunity to vote on the frequency of say-on-pay votes at least every six years, indicating whether the say-on-pay vote should be held annually, biennially, or triennially. The Company has annually included in the proxy statement a separate advisory vote on the compensation paid to executives. The say-on-pay, the say-on- parachute and the say-on-frequency votes are advisory and explicitly nonbinding and cannot override a decision of the Company's board of directors. Other Regulatory Matters: The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to oversight by the SEC, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, (“FINRA”), the PCAOB, the NASDAQ stock exchange and various state securities regulators. The Company and its subsidiaries have from time to time received requests for information from regulatory authorities in various states, including state attorneys general, securities regulators and other regulatory authorities, concerning business practices. Such requests are considered incidental to the normal conduct of business. Capital Requirements The Company and Seacoast Bank are required under federal law to maintain certain minimum capital levels based on ratios of capital to total assets and capital to risk-weighted assets. The required capital ratios are minimums, and the Federal Reserve and OCC may determine that a banking organization, based on its size, complexity or risk profile, must maintain a higher level of capital in order to operate in a safe and sound manner. Risks such as concentration of credit risks and the risk arising from non- traditional activities, as well as the institution’s exposure to a decline in the economic value of its capital due to changes in interest rates, and an institution’s ability to manage those risks are important factors that are to be taken into account by the federal banking agencies in assessing an institution’s overall capital adequacy. The following is a brief description of the relevant provisions of these capital rules and their potential impact on the Company's and Seacoast Bank's capital levels. The Company and Seacoast Bank are subject to the following risk-based capital ratios: a common equity Tier 1 ("CET1") risk- based capital ratio, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio, which includes CET1 and additional Tier 1 capital, and a total capital ratio, 9 which includes Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital. CET1 is primarily comprised of the sum of common stock instruments and related surplus net of treasury stock, retained earnings, and certain qualifying minority interests, less certain adjustments and deductions, including with respect to goodwill, intangible assets, mortgage servicing assets and deferred tax assets subject to temporary timing differences. Additional Tier 1 capital is primarily comprised of noncumulative perpetual preferred stock, tier 1 minority interests and grandfathered trust preferred securities. Tier 2 capital consists of instruments disqualified from Tier 1 capital, including qualifying subordinated debt, other preferred stock and certain hybrid capital instruments, and a limited amount of loan loss reserves up to a maximum of 1.25% of risk-weighted assets, subject to certain eligibility criteria. The capital rules also define the risk-weights assigned to assets and off-balance sheet items to determine the risk-weighted asset components of the risk-based capital rules, including, for example, “high volatility” commercial real estate, past due assets, structured securities and equity holdings. The leverage capital ratio, which serves as a minimum capital standard, is the ratio of Tier 1 capital to quarterly average assets net of goodwill, certain other intangible assets, and certain required deduction items. The required minimum leverage ratio for all banks and bank holding companies is 4%. In addition, effective January 1, 2019, the capital rules require a capital conservation buffer of 2.5% above each of the minimum risk-based capital ratio requirements (CET1, Tier 1 and total risk-based capital), which is designed to absorb losses during periods of economic stress. These buffer requirements must be met for a bank or bank holding company to be able to pay dividends, engage in share buybacks or make discretionary bonus payments to executive management without restriction. Failure to be well-capitalized or to meet minimum capital requirements could result in certain mandatory and possible additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have an adverse material effect on the operations or financial condition of the Company or Seacoast Bank. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements could also result in restrictions on the Company’s or Seacoast Bank’s ability to pay dividends or otherwise distribute capital or to receive regulatory approval of applications or other restrictions on growth. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (“FDICIA”), among other things, requires the federal bank regulatory agencies to take “prompt corrective action” regarding depository institutions that do not meet minimum capital requirements. FDICIA establishes five regulatory capital tiers: “well capitalized”, “adequately capitalized”, “undercapitalized”, “significantly undercapitalized”, and “critically undercapitalized”. A depository institution’s capital tier will depend upon how its capital levels compare to various relevant capital measures and certain other factors, as established by regulation. FDICIA imposes progressively more restrictive restraints on operations, management and capital distributions, depending on the category in which an institution is classified. FDICIA generally prohibits a depository institution from making any capital distribution (including payment of a dividend) or paying any management fee to its holding company if the depository institution would thereafter be undercapitalized. All of the federal bank regulatory agencies have adopted regulations establishing relevant capital measures and relevant capital levels for federally insured depository institutions. To be well-capitalized, Seacoast Bank must maintain at least the following capital ratios: • • • • 10.0% Total capital to risk-weighted assets 8.0% Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted asset 6.5% CET1 to risk-weighted assets; and 5.0% leverage ratio. The Federal Reserve has not yet revised the well-capitalized standard for bank holding companies to reflect the higher capital requirements imposed under the current capital rules. For purposes of the Federal Reserve’s Regulation Y, including determining whether a bank holding company meets the requirements to be a financial holding company, bank holding companies, such as the Company, must maintain a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6.0% or greater and a total risk-based capital ratio of 10.0% or greater to be well-capitalized. If the Federal Reserve were to apply the same or a similar well-capitalized standard to bank holding companies as that applicable to Seacoast Bank, the Company’s capital ratios as of December 31, 2019 would exceed such revised well-capitalized standard. Also, the Federal Reserve may require bank holding companies, including the Company, to maintain capital ratios substantially in excess of mandated minimum levels, depending upon general economic conditions and a bank holding company’s particular condition, risk profile and growth plans. In 2019, the Company’s and Seacoast Bank’s regulatory capital ratios were above the well-capitalized standards and met the then- applicable capital conservation buffer as of December 31, 2019. Based on current estimates, we believe that the Company and Seacoast Bank will continue to exceed all applicable well-capitalized regulatory capital requirements and the capital conservation buffer in 2020. As of December 31, 2019 the consolidated capital ratios of Seacoast and Seacoast Bank were as follows: 10 Total Risk-Based Capital Ratio Tier 1 Capital Ratio Common Equity Tier 1 Capital Ratio (CET1) Leverage Ratio 1For subsidiary bank only Seacoast (Consolidated) 15.71% 15.06% 13.77% 12.20% Seacoast Bank 14.68% 14.04% 14.04% 11.38% Minimum to be Well-Capitalized1 10.00% 8.00% 6.50% 5.00% On October 29, 2019, the federal banking agencies jointly issued a final rule to simplify the regulatory capital requirements for eligible banks and holding companies with less than $10 billion in consolidated assets that opt into the Community Bank Leverage Ratio (“CBLR”) framework, as required by Section 201 of the Economic Growth, Relief and Consumer Protection Act (the “Regulatory Relief Act”). A qualifying community banking organization that exceeds the CBLR threshold would be exempt from the agencies’ current capital framework, including the risk-based capital requirements and capital conservation buffer described above, and would be deemed well-capitalized under the agencies’ prompt corrective action regulations. The Regulatory Relief Act defines a “qualifying community banking organization” as a depository institution or depository institution holding company with total consolidated assets of less than $10 billion. Under the final rule, if a qualifying community banking organization elects to use the CBLR framework, it will be considered “well-capitalized” so long as its CBLR is greater than 9%. The CBLR framework will first be available for banking organizations, such as the Company and Seacoast Bank, to use in their March 31, 2020 regulatory reports. The Company has evaluated the impact of this rule and does not plan to use the CBLR framework. Payment of Dividends The Company is a legal entity separate and distinct from Seacoast Bank and its other subsidiaries. The Company's primary source of cash, other than securities offerings, is dividends from Seacoast Bank. The prior approval of the OCC is required if the total of all dividends declared by a national bank (such as Seacoast Bank) in any calendar year will exceed the sum of such bank’s net profits for that year and its retained net profits for the preceding two calendar years, less any required transfers to surplus. Federal law also prohibits any national bank from paying dividends that would be greater than such bank’s undivided profits after deducting statutory bad debts in excess of such bank’s allowance for possible loan losses. In addition, the Company and Seacoast Bank are subject to various general regulatory policies and requirements relating to the payment of dividends, including requirements to maintain adequate capital above regulatory minimums. The appropriate federal bank regulatory authority may prohibit the payment of dividends where it has determined that the payment of dividends would be an unsafe or unsound practice. The OCC and the Federal Reserve have indicated that paying dividends that deplete a bank’s capital base to an inadequate level would be an unsound and unsafe banking practice. The OCC and the Federal Reserve have each indicated that depository institutions and their holding companies should generally pay dividends only out of current operating earnings. Under a Federal Reserve policy adopted in 2009, the board of directors of a bank holding company must consider different factors to ensure that its dividend level is prudent relative to maintaining a strong financial position, and is not based on overly optimistic earnings scenarios, such as potential events that could affect its ability to pay, while still maintaining a strong financial position. As a general matter, the Federal Reserve has indicated that the board of directors of a bank holding company should consult with the Federal Reserve and eliminate, defer or significantly reduce the bank holding company’s dividends if: • • • its net income available to shareholders for the past four quarters, net of dividends previously paid during that period, is not sufficient to fully fund the dividends; its prospective rate of earnings retention is not consistent with its capital needs and overall current and prospective financial condition; or it will not meet, or is in danger of not meeting, its minimum regulatory capital adequacy ratios. The Company has traditionally relied upon dividends from Seacoast Bank and securities offerings to provide funds to pay the Company’s expenses and to service the Company’s debt. During the year ended December 31, 2019, Seacoast Bank distributed $18.1 million to the Company. No distributions from Seacoast Bank to the Company were declared in 2018 or 2017. Prior approval by the OCC is required if the total of all dividends declared by a national bank in any calendar year exceeds the bank’s profits for that year combined with its retained net profits for the preceding two calendar years. Under this restriction Seacoast Bank is eligible to distribute dividends up to $187.3 million to the Holding Company, without prior OCC approval, as of December 31, 2019. No dividends on the Company's common stock were declared or paid in 2019, 2018, and 2017. 11 Regulation of the Bank As a national bank, Seacoast Bank is subject to comprehensive supervision and regulation by the OCC and is subject to its regulatory reporting requirements. The deposits of Seacoast Bank are insured by the FDIC up to the applicable limits, and, accordingly, the bank is also subject to certain FDIC regulations and the FDIC has backup examination authority and certain enforcement powers over Seacoast Bank. Seacoast Bank also is subject to certain Federal Reserve regulations. In addition, as discussed in more detail below, Seacoast Bank and any of the Company's other subsidiaries that offer consumer financial products and services are subject to regulation and potential supervision by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”). Authority to supervise and examine the Company and Seacoast Bank for compliance with federal consumer laws remains largely with the Federal Reserve and the OCC, respectively. However, the CFPB may participate in examinations on a “sampling basis” and may refer potential enforcement actions against such institutions to their primary regulators. The CFPB also may participate in examinations of the Company's other direct or indirect subsidiaries that offer consumer financial products or services. In addition, the Dodd-Frank Act permits states to adopt consumer protection laws and regulations that are stricter than those regulations promulgated by the CFPB, and state attorneys general are permitted to enforce certain federal consumer financial protection law. Broadly, regulations applicable to Seacoast Bank include limitations on loans to a single borrower and to its directors, officers and employees; restrictions on the opening and closing of branch offices; the maintenance of required capital ratios; the granting of credit under equal and fair conditions; the disclosure of the costs and terms of such credit; requirements to maintain reserves against deposits and loans; limitations on the types of investments that may be made by Seacoast Bank; and requirements governing risk management practices. Seacoast Bank is permitted under federal law to open a branch on a de novo basis across state lines where the laws of that state would permit a bank chartered by that state to open a de novo branch. Transactions with Affiliates and Insiders: Seacoast Bank is subject to restrictions on extensions of credit and certain other transactions between Seacoast Bank and the Company or any nonbank affiliate. Generally, these covered transactions with either the Company or any affiliate are limited to 10% of Seacoast Bank’s capital and surplus, and all such transactions between Seacoast Bank and the Company and all of its nonbank affiliates combined are limited to 20% of Seacoast Bank’s capital and surplus. Loans and other extensions of credit from Seacoast Bank to the Company or any affiliate generally are required to be secured by eligible collateral in specified amounts. In addition, any transaction between Seacoast Bank and the Company or any affiliate are required to be on an arm’s length basis. Federal banking laws also place similar restrictions on certain extensions of credit by insured banks, such as Seacoast Bank, to their directors, executive officers and principal shareholders. Reserves: Federal Reserve rules require depository institutions, such as Seacoast Bank, to maintain reserves against their transaction accounts, primarily interest bearing and non-interest bearing checking accounts. For 2019, the first $16.3 million of covered balances were exempt from these reserve requirements, aggregate balances between $16.3 million and $124.2 million were subject to a 3% reserve requirement, and aggregate balances above $124.2 million were subject to a reserve requirement of $3.2 million plus 10% of the amount over $124.2 million. These reserve requirements are subject to annual adjustment by the Federal Reserve. FDIC Insurance Assessments and Depositor Preference: Seacoast Bank’s deposits are insured by the FDIC’s DIF up to the limits under applicable law, which currently are set at $250,000 per depositor, per insured bank, for each account ownership category. Seacoast Bank is subject to FDIC assessments for its deposit insurance. The FDIC calculates quarterly deposit insurance assessments based on an institution’s average total consolidated assets less its average tangible equity, and applies one of four risk categories determined by reference to its capital levels, supervisory ratings, and certain other factors. The assessment rate schedule can change from time to time, at the discretion of the FDIC, subject to certain limits. In the third quarter of 2018, the FDIC announced the achievement of their target deposit insurance reserve ratio, resulting in Seacoast Bank's ability to apply previously awarded credits to its deposit insurance assessment beginning in the third quarter of 2019. Seacoast Bank has remaining credits of $0.7 million, which will be applied to future assessments if the FDIC’s reserve ratio remains above the target threshold. In addition, Seacoast Bank was subject to quarterly assessments by the FDIC to pay interest on Financing Corporation (“FICO”) bonds. The remaining FICO bonds matured in September 2019 and the final FICO assessment was made in March 2019. Deposit insurance may be terminated by the FDIC upon a finding that the institution has engaged in unsafe and unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations, or has violated any applicable law, regulation, rule, order or condition imposed by a bank’s federal regulatory agency. In addition, the Federal Deposit Insurance Act provides that, in the event of the liquidation or other resolution of an insured depository institution, the claims of depositors of the institution, including the claims of the FDIC as subrogee of insured depositors, and certain claims for administrative expenses of the FDIC as a receiver, will have priority over other general unsecured claims against the institution, including those of the parent bank holding company. Standards for Safety and Soundness: The Federal Deposit Insurance Act requires the federal bank regulatory agencies to prescribe, by regulation or guideline, operational and managerial standards for all insured depository institutions relating to: (1) internal 12 controls; (2) information systems and audit systems; (3) loan documentation; (4) credit underwriting; (5) interest rate risk exposure; and (6) asset quality. The federal banking agencies have adopted regulations and Interagency Guidelines Establishing Standards for Safety and Soundness to implement these required standards. These guidelines set forth the safety and soundness standards used to identify and address problems at insured depository institutions before capital becomes impaired. Under the regulations, if a regulator determines that a bank fails to meet any standards prescribed by the guidelines, the regulator may require the bank to submit an acceptable plan to achieve compliance, consistent with deadlines for the submission and review of such safety and soundness compliance plans. Anti-Money Laundering: Under the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (“USA PATRIOT”) Act of 2001, financial institutions are subject to prohibitions against specified financial transactions and account relationships as well as enhanced due diligence and “Know Your Customer” standards in their dealings with foreign financial institutions and foreign customers. The USA PATRIOT Act, and its implementing regulations adopted by the FinCEN, a bureau of the U.S. Department of the Treasury, requires financial institutions to establish anti-money laundering programs with minimum standards that include: • • • • the development of internal policies, procedures, and controls; the designation of a compliance officer; an ongoing employee training program; and an independent audit function to test the programs. In addition, FinCEN issued rules that became effective on May 11, 2018, that require, subject to certain exclusions and exemptions, covered financial institutions to identify and verify the identity of beneficial owners of legal entity customers. Banking regulators will consider compliance with the Act’s money laundering provisions in acting upon acquisition and merger proposals. Bank regulators routinely examine institutions for compliance with these obligations and have been active in imposing cease and desist and other regulatory orders and money penalty sanctions against institutions found to be violating these obligations. Sanctions for violations of the Act can be imposed in an amount equal to twice the sum involved in the violating transaction, up to $1 million. Economic Sanctions: The Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) is responsible for helping to ensure that U.S. entities do not engage in transactions with certain prohibited parties, as defined by various Executive Orders and acts of Congress. OFAC publishes, and routinely updates, lists of names of persons and organizations suspected of aiding, harboring or engaging in terrorist acts, including the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List. If the Company finds a name on any transaction, account or wire transfer that is on an OFAC list, it must undertake certain specified activities, which could include blocking or freezing the account or transaction requested, and it must notify the appropriate authorities. Concentrations in Lending: In 2006, the federal bank regulatory agencies released guidance on “Concentrations in Commercial Real Estate Lending” (the “Guidance”) and advised financial institutions of the risks posed by commercial real estate (“CRE”) lending concentrations. The Guidance requires that appropriate processes be in place to identify, monitor and control risks associated with real estate lending concentrations. Higher allowances for loan losses and capital levels may also be required. The Guidance is triggered when CRE loan concentrations exceed either: • • Total reported loans for construction, land development, and other land of 100% or more of a bank’s total risk based capital; or Total reported loans secured by multifamily and nonfarm nonresidential properties and loans for construction, land development, and other land of 300% or more of a bank’s total risk based capital. The Guidance also applies when a bank has a sharp increase in CRE loans or has significant concentrations of CRE secured by a particular property type. Seacoast Bank has exposures to loans secured by commercial real estate due to the nature of its markets and the loan needs of both our retail and commercial customers. Seacoast Bank believes that its long term experience in CRE lending, underwriting policies, internal controls, and other policies currently in place, as well as its loan and credit monitoring and administration procedures, are generally appropriate to managing our concentrations as required under the Guidance. At December 31, 2019, Seacoast Bank had outstanding $181.3 million in commercial construction and residential land development loans and $143.8 million in residential construction loans to individuals, which represents approximately 40% of total risk based capital at December 31, 2019, well below the Guidance’s threshold. At December 31, 2019, the total CRE exposure for Seacoast Bank represents approximately 204% of total risk based capital, also below the Guidance’s threshold. On a consolidated basis, construction and land development and commercial real estate loans represent 38% and 191%, respectively, of total consolidated risk based capital. 13 Community Reinvestment Act: Seacoast Bank is subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”), which imposes a continuing and affirmative obligation, consistent with safe and sound operation, to help meet the credit needs of entire communities where the bank accepts deposits, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods. The OCC’s assessment of Seacoast Bank’s CRA record is made available to the public. Further, a less than satisfactory CRA rating will slow, if not preclude, expansion of banking activities and prevent a company from becoming or remaining a financial holding company. Following the enactment of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (“GLBA”), CRA agreements with private parties must be disclosed and annual CRA reports must be made to a bank’s primary federal regulator. A bank holding company is not permitted to become or remain a financial holding company and no new activities authorized under GLBA may be commenced by a holding company or by a bank financial subsidiary if any of its bank subsidiaries receive less than a “satisfactory” CRA rating in its latest CRA examination. Federal CRA regulations require, among other things, that evidence of discrimination against applicants on a prohibited basis, and illegal or abusive lending practices be considered in the CRA evaluation. Seacoast Bank has a rating of “Outstanding” in its most recent CRA evaluation. Privacy and Data Security: The GLBA generally prohibits disclosure of consumer information to non-affiliated third parties unless the consumer has been given the opportunity to object and has not objected to such disclosure. Financial institutions are further required to disclose their privacy policies to customers annually. Financial institutions, however, will be required to comply with state law if it is more protective of consumer privacy than the GLBA. The GLBA also directs federal regulators, including the FDIC and the OCC, to prescribe standards for the security of consumer information. Seacoast Bank is subject to such standards, as well as standards for notifying customers in the event of a security breach. Seacoast Bank is similarly required to have an information security program to safeguard the confidentiality and security of customer information and to ensure proper disposal. Customers must be notified when unauthorized disclosure involves sensitive customer information that may be misused. Consumer Regulation: Activities of Seacoast Bank are subject to a variety of statutes and regulations designed to protect consumers. These laws and regulations include, among numerous other things, provisions that: • • • • • • limit the interest and other charges collected or contracted for by Seacoast Bank, including new rules respecting the terms of credit cards and of debit card overdrafts; govern Seacoast Bank’s disclosures of credit terms to consumer borrowers; require Seacoast Bank to provide information to enable the public and public officials to determine whether it is fulfilling its obligation to help meet the housing needs of the community it serves; prohibit Seacoast Bank from discriminating on the basis of race, creed or other prohibited factors when it makes decisions to extend credit; govern the manner in which Seacoast Bank may collect consumer debts; and prohibit unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices in the provision of consumer financial products and services. Mortgage Regulation: The CFPB adopted a rule that implements the ability-to-repay and qualified mortgage provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act (the “ATR/QM rule”), which requires lenders to consider, among other things, income, employment status, assets, payment amounts, and credit history before approving a mortgage, and provides a compliance “safe harbor” for lenders that issue certain “qualified mortgages.” The ATR/QM rule defines a “qualified mortgage” to have certain specified characteristics, and generally prohibits loans with negative amortization, interest-only payments, balloon payments, or terms exceeding 30 years from being qualified mortgages. The rule also establishes general underwriting criteria for qualified mortgages, including that monthly payments be calculated based on the highest payment that will apply in the first five years of the loan and that the borrower have a total debt-to-income ratio that is less than or equal to 43%. While “qualified mortgages” will generally be afforded safe harbor status, a rebuttable presumption of compliance with the ability-to-repay requirements will attach to “qualified mortgages” that are “higher priced mortgages” (which are generally subprime loans). In addition, the securitizer of asset-backed securities must retain not less than 5 percent of the credit risk of the assets collateralizing the asset-backed securities, unless subject to an exemption for asset-backed securities that are collateralized exclusively by residential mortgages that qualify as “qualified residential mortgages.” The CFPB has also issued rules to implement requirements of the Dodd-Frank Act pertaining to mortgage loan origination (including with respect to loan originator compensation and loan originator qualifications) as well as integrated mortgage disclosure rules. In addition, the CFPB has issued rules that require servicers to comply with certain standards and practices with regard to: error correction; information disclosure; force-placement of insurance; information management policies and procedures; requiring information about mortgage loss mitigation options be provided to delinquent borrowers; providing delinquent borrowers access to servicer personnel with continuity of contact about the borrower’s mortgage loan account; and evaluating borrowers’ applications for available loss mitigation options. These rules also address initial rate adjustment notices for adjustable-rate mortgages (ARMs), 14 periodic statements for residential mortgage loans, and prompt crediting of mortgage payments and response to requests for payoff amounts. Non-Discrimination Policies: Seacoast Bank is also subject to, among other things, the provisions of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (the “ECOA”) and the Fair Housing Act (the “FHA”), both of which prohibit discrimination based on race or color, religion, national origin, sex, and familial status in any aspect of a consumer or commercial credit or residential real estate transaction. The Department of Justice (the “DOJ”), and the federal bank regulatory agencies have issued an Interagency Policy Statement on Discrimination in Lending that provides guidance to financial institutions in determining whether discrimination exists, how the agencies will respond to lending discrimination, and what steps lenders might take to prevent discriminatory lending practices. The DOJ has increased its efforts to prosecute what it regards as violations of the ECOA and FHA. Item 1A. Risk Factors In addition to the other information contained in this Form 10-K, you should carefully consider the risks described below, as well as the risk factors and uncertainties discussed in our other public filings with the SEC under the caption “Risk Factors” in evaluating us and our business and making or continuing an investment in our stock. The risks contained in this Form 10-K are not the only risks that we face. Additional risks that are not presently known, or that we presently deem to be immaterial, could also harm our business, results of operations and financial condition and an investment in our stock. The trading price of our securities could decline due to the materialization of any of these risks, and our shareholders may lose all or part of their investment. This Form 10-K also contains forward-looking statements that may not be realized as a result of certain factors, including, but not limited to, the risks described herein and in our other public filings with the SEC. Please refer to the section in this Form 10- K entitled “Special Cautionary Notice Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” for additional information regarding forward- looking statements. Merger-Related Risks The market price of Seacoast common stock after the mergers may be affected by factors different from those currently affecting First Bank, Fourth Street or Seacoast. The businesses of Seacoast, First Bank and Fourth Street differ in some respects and, accordingly, the results of operations of the combined companies and the market price of Seacoast’s shares of common stock after the mergers may be affected by factors different from those currently affecting the independent results of operations of each of Seacoast, First Bank and Fourth Street. Because the sale price of Seacoast common stock will fluctuate, shareholders cannot be sure of the value of the per share stock consideration that they will receive in the mergers until the closing. Under the terms of the merger agreement with First Bank, each share of First Bank common stock outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the merger (excluding shares of First Bank common stock owned by First Bank, Seacoast or Seacoast Bank or the dissenting shares) will be converted into the right to receive 0.2000 shares of Seacoast common stock (plus cash in lieu of fractional shares), which is subject to adjustment based on the value of First Bank’s consolidated tangible shareholder’s equity and First Bank’s general allowance for loan and lease losses. Under the terms of the merger agreement with Fourth Street, each share of Fourth Street common stock outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the merger (excluding shares of Fourth Street common stock owned by Fourth Street, Seacoast or Seacoast Bank or the dissenting shares) will be converted into the right to receive 0.1275 shares of Seacoast common stock (plus cash in lieu of fractional shares). The value of the shares of Seacoast common stock to be issued to First Bank and Fourth Street shareholders in the mergers will fluctuate between now and the closing date of the mergers due to a variety of factors, including general market and economic conditions, changes in the parties’ respective businesses, operations and prospects and regulatory considerations, among other things. Many of these factors are beyond the control of Seacoast, First Bank and Fourth Street. We make no assurances as to whether or when the mergers will be completed. First Bank and Fourth Street shareholders should obtain current sale prices for shares of Seacoast common stock before voting their shares of common stock at the special meetings. The mergers will not be completed unless important conditions are satisfied or waived, including approval by First Bank and Fourth Street shareholders. Specified conditions set forth in the merger agreements must be satisfied or waived to complete the mergers. If the conditions are not satisfied or waived, to the extent permitted by law or stock exchange rules, the mergers will not occur or will be delayed and each of Seacoast, First Bank and/or Fourth Street may lose some or all of the intended benefits of the mergers. The following 15 conditions, in addition to other closing conditions, must be satisfied or waived, if permissible, before Seacoast, First Bank and Fourth Street are obligated to complete the merger: • The merger agreements and the transactions contemplated thereby must have been approved by the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of First Bank and Fourth Street common stock; • All regulatory consents required to consummate the transactions contemplated by the merger agreements must have been obtained and all waiting periods required by law must have expired and such consents must not be subject to any condition or consequence that would have a material adverse effect on Seacoast or any of its subsidiaries, including First Bank and Fourth Street, after the effective time of the merger; • No order issued by any governmental authority preventing the consummation of the mergers shall be in effect and no law or order shall have been enacted, entered, promulgated or enforced by any governmental authority that prohibits, restrains or makes illegal the consummation of the mergers; • The registration statements registering shares of Seacoast common stock to be issued in the mergers must have been declared effective, no stop order may have been issued by the SEC and no action, suit, proceeding or investigation by the SEC to suspend the effectiveness of the registration statements shall have been initiated and continuing; • The holders of no more than 5% of First Bank and Fourth Street common stock shall have taken the actions to qualify their common stock as dissenting shares; • Since the date of the merger agreements, no fact, circumstance or event shall have occurred that has had or is reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on either party; and • Certain First Bank and Fourth Street employees shall have entered into claims letters and/or restrictive covenant agreements. Seacoast, First Bank and Fourth Street will be subject to business uncertainties and contractual restrictions while the mergers are pending. Uncertainty about the effect of the mergers on employees, customers, suppliers and vendors may have an adverse effect on the business, financial condition and results of operations of First Bank, Fourth Street and Seacoast. These uncertainties may impair Seacoast’s, First Bank’s or Fourth Street’s ability to attract, retain and motivate key personnel, depositors and borrowers pending the consummation of the mergers, as such personnel, depositors and borrowers may experience uncertainty about their future roles following the consummation of the mergers. Additionally, these uncertainties could cause customers (including depositors and borrowers), suppliers, vendors and others who deal with Seacoast, First Bank or Fourth Street to seek to change existing business relationships with Seacoast, First Bank or Fourth Street or fail to extend an existing relationship. In addition, competitors may target each party’s existing customers by highlighting potential uncertainties and integration difficulties that may result from the mergers. Seacoast, First Bank and Fourth Street have a small number of key personnel. The pursuit of the mergers and the preparation for the integrations may place a burden on each company’s management and internal resources. Any significant diversion of management attention away from ongoing business concerns and any difficulties encountered in the transition and integration process could have a material adverse effect on each company’s business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the merger agreements restrict First Bank and Fourth Street from taking certain actions without Seacoast’s consent while the merger is pending. These restrictions may, among other matters, prevent First Bank and Fourth Street from pursuing otherwise attractive business opportunities, selling assets, incurring indebtedness, engaging in significant capital expenditures in excess of certain limits set forth in the merger agreement, entering into other transactions or making other changes to First Bank’s or Fourth Street’s business prior to consummation of the mergers or termination of the merger agreements. These restrictions could have a material adverse effect on First Bank’s and Fourth Street’s business, financial condition and results of operations. Seacoast may fail to realize the cost savings estimated for the mergers. Although Seacoast estimates that it will realize cost savings from the mergers when fully phased in, it is possible that the estimates of the potential cost savings could turn out to be incorrect. For example, the combined purchasing power may not be as strong as expected, and therefore the cost savings could be reduced. In addition, unanticipated growth in Seacoast’s business may require Seacoast to continue to operate or maintain some facilities or support functions that are currently expected to be combined or reduced. The cost savings estimates also depend on Seacoast’s ability to combine the businesses of Seacoast, First Bank and Fourth Street in a manner that permits those costs savings to be realized. If the estimates turn out to be incorrect or Seacoast is not able to combine the companies successfully, the anticipated cost savings may not be fully realized or realized at all, or may take longer to realize than expected. 16 The combined companies expect to incur substantial expenses related to the mergers. The combined companies expect to incur substantial expenses in connection with completing the mergers and combining the business, operations, networks, systems, technologies, policies and procedures of the companies. Although Seacoast, First Bank and Fourth Street have assumed that a certain level of transaction and combination expenses would be incurred, there are a number of factors beyond their control that could affect the total amount or the timing of their combination expenses. Many of the expenses that will be incurred, by their nature, are difficult to estimate accurately at the present time. Due to these factors, the transactions and combination expenses associated with the mergers could, particularly in the near term, exceed the savings that the combined companies expect to achieve from the elimination of duplicative expenses and the realization of economies of scale and cost savings related to the combinations of the businesses following the completion of the mergers. In addition, prior to completion of the merger, each of First Bank, Fourth Street and Seacoast will incur or have incurred substantial expenses in connection with the negotiation and completion of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreements. If the mergers are not completed, Seacoast, First Bank and Fourth Street would have to recognize these expenses without realizing the anticipated benefits of the mergers. Failure of the mergers to be completed, the termination of the merger agreements or a significant delay in the consummation of the mergers could negatively impact Seacoast, First Bank and Fourth Street. If the mergers are not consummated, the ongoing business, financial condition and results of operations of each party may be materially adversely affected and the market price of each party’s common stock may decline significantly, particularly to the extent that the current market price reflects a market assumption that the mergers will be consummated. If the consummation of the mergers are delayed, the business, financial condition and results of operations of each company may be materially adversely affected. If the merger agreements are terminated and a party’s board of directors seeks another merger or business combination, such party’s shareholders cannot be certain that such party will be able to find a party willing to engage in a transaction on more attractive terms than the mergers. Risks Related to Our Business A reduction in consumer confidence could negatively impact our results of operations and financial condition. Significant market volatility driven in part by concerns relating to, among other things, actions by the U.S. Congress or imposed through Executive Order by the President of the United States, as well as global political actions or events, including natural disasters, health emergencies or pandemics, could adversely affect the U.S. or global economies, with direct or indirect impacts on the Company and our business. Results could include reduced consumer and business confidence, credit deterioration, diminished capital markets activity, and actions by the Federal Reserve Board impacting interest rates or other U.S. monetary policy. Consumers may decide not to use banks to complete their financial transactions, which could adversely affect our net income. Technology and other changes now allow parties to complete financial transactions without banks. For example, consumers can pay bills, transfer funds directly and obtain loans without banks. This process could result in the loss of interest and fee income, as well as the loss of customer deposits and the income generated from those deposits. Non-bank financial technology providers invest substantial resources in developing and designing new technology, particularly digital and mobile technology, and are beginning to offer more traditional banking products either directly or through bank partnerships. Further, clients may choose to conduct business with other market participants who engage in business or offer products in areas we deem speculative or risky, such as cryptocurrencies. Increased competition may negatively affect our earnings by creating pressure to lower prices or credit standards on our products and services requiring additional investment to improve the quality and delivery of our technology and/or reducing our market share, or affecting the willingness of our clients to do business with us. In addition, the widespread adoption of new technologies, including internet banking services, cryptocurrencies and payment systems, could require substantial expenditures to modify or adapt our existing products and services as we grow and develop our internet banking and mobile banking channel strategies in addition to remote connectivity solutions. We might not be successful in developing or introducing new products and services, integrating new products or services into our existing offerings, responding or adapting to changes in consumer behavior, preferences, spending, investing and/or saving habits, achieving market acceptance of our products and services, reducing costs in response to pressures to deliver products and services at lower prices or sufficiently developing and maintaining loyal customers. 17 Our customers may pursue alternatives to bank deposits, causing us to lose a relatively inexpensive source of funding. We may experience a decrease in customer deposits if customers perceive alternative investments, such as the stock market, as providing superior expected returns. When customers move money out of bank deposits in favor of alternative investments, we may lose a relatively inexpensive source of funds, and be forced to rely more heavily on borrowings and other sources of funding to fund our business and meet withdrawal demands, thereby increasing our funding costs and adversely affecting our net interest margin. Our future success is dependent on our ability to compete effectively in highly competitive markets. We operate in markets throughout the State of Florida, each with unique characteristics and opportunities. Our future growth and success will depend on our ability to compete effectively in these and other potential markets. We compete for loans, deposits and other financial services in geographic markets with other local, regional and national commercial banks, thrifts, credit unions, mortgage lenders, and securities and insurance brokerage firms. Many of our competitors offer products and services different from us, and have substantially greater resources, name recognition and market presence than we do, which benefits them in attracting business. Larger competitors may be able to price loans and deposits more aggressively than we can, and have broader customer and geographic bases to draw upon. Lending goals may not be attainable. Future demand for additional lending is unclear and uncertain, and opportunities to make loans may be more limited and/or involve risks or terms that we likely would not find acceptable or in our shareholders’ best interest. A failure to meet our lending goals could adversely affect our results of operation, and financial condition, liquidity and capital. Deterioration in the real estate markets, including the secondary market for residential mortgage loans, can adversely affect us. A correction in residential real estate market prices or reduced levels of home sales, could result in lower single family home values, adversely affecting the liquidity and value of collateral securing commercial loans for residential land acquisition, construction and development, as well as residential mortgage loans and residential property collateral securing loans that we hold, mortgage loan originations and gains on the sale of mortgage loans. Declining real estate prices cause higher delinquencies and losses on certain mortgage loans, generally, and particularly on second lien mortgages and home equity lines of credit. Significant ongoing disruptions in the secondary market for residential mortgage loans can limit the market for and liquidity of most residential mortgage loans other than conforming Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac loans. Deteriorating trends could occur, including declines in real estate values, home sales volumes, financial stress on borrowers as a result of job losses or other factors. These could have adverse effects on borrowers that result in higher delinquencies and greater charge-offs in future periods, which would adversely affect our financial condition, including capital and liquidity, or results of operations. In the event our allowance for loan losses is insufficient to cover such losses, our earnings, capital and liquidity could be adversely affected. Our real estate portfolios are exposed if weakness in the Florida housing market or general economy arises. Florida has historically experienced deeper recessions and more dramatic slowdowns in economic activity than other states and a decline in real estate values in Florida can be significantly larger than the national average. Declines in home prices and the volume of home sales in Florida, along with the reduced availability of certain types of mortgage credit, can result in increases in delinquencies and losses in our portfolios of home equity lines and loans, and commercial loans related to residential real estate acquisition, construction and development. Declines in home prices coupled with high or increased unemployment levels or increased interest rates can cause losses which adversely affect our earnings and financial condition, including our capital and liquidity. In addition, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “Tax Reform Act”) contained several provisions that affect the tax consequences of home ownership and related borrowing. We cannot predict the long-term impact, if any, of the Tax Reform Act on our mortgage lending business or the value of homes securing mortgages or other loans, but any decrease in mortgage lending, decrease in home values, or early repayment of mortgage loans caused by changes to the tax code as a result of the Tax Reform Act could have a material adverse effect on our earnings and capital. Our concentration in commercial real estate loans could result in increased loan losses. Commercial real estate (“CRE”) is cyclical and poses risks of loss to us due to our concentration levels and risks of the asset, especially during a difficult economy. As of December 31, 2019, 46% of our loan portfolio was comprised of CRE loans. The banking regulators continue to give CRE lending greater scrutiny, and banks with higher levels of CRE loans are expected to have implemented improved underwriting, internal controls, risk management policies and portfolio stress testing, as well as higher levels of allowances for possible losses and capital levels as a result of CRE lending growth and exposures. 18 Seacoast Bank has a CRE concentration risk management program and monitors its exposure to CRE; however, there can be no assurance that the program will be effective in managing our concentration in CRE. Nonperforming assets could result in an increase in our provision for loan losses, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. At December 31, 2019, our nonperforming loans (which consist of nonaccrual loans) totaled $27.0 million, or 0.5% of the loan portfolio and our nonperforming assets were $39.3 million, or 0.6%, of assets, which included $6.8 million for branches taken out of service. In addition, we had approximately $8.4 million in accruing loans that were 30 days or more delinquent at December 31, 2019. Our nonperforming assets adversely affect our net income in various ways. We generally do not record interest income on nonaccrual loans or OREO, thereby adversely affecting our income, and increasing our loan administration costs. When the only source of repayment expected is the underlying collateral, we are required to mark the related loan to the then fair market value of the collateral, if less than the recorded amount of our investment, which may result in a loss. These loans and OREO also increase our risk profile and the capital our regulators believe is appropriate in light of such risks. We may incur additional losses relating to an increase in nonperforming loans. If economic conditions and market factors negatively and/or disproportionately affect some of our larger loans, then we could see a sharp increase in our total net charge-offs and our provision for loan losses. Any increase in our nonperforming assets and related increases in our provision for losses on loans could negatively affect our business and could have a material adverse effect on our capital, financial condition and results of operations. Decreases in the value of these assets, or the underlying collateral, or in these borrowers’ performance or financial conditions, whether or not due to economic and market conditions beyond our control, could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, the resolution of nonperforming assets requires significant commitments of time from management and our personnel, which can be detrimental to the performance of their other responsibilities. There can be no assurance that we will not experience increases in nonperforming loans in the future, or that nonperforming assets will not result in losses in the future. Our allowance for loan losses may prove inadequate or we may be adversely affected by credit risk exposures. Our business depends on the creditworthiness of our customers. We review our allowance for loan losses for adequacy, at a minimum quarterly, considering economic conditions and trends, collateral values and credit quality indicators, including past charge-off experience and levels of past due loans and nonperforming assets. The determination of the appropriate level of the allowance for loan losses involves a high degree of subjectivity and judgment and requires us to make significant estimates of current credit risks and future trends, all of which may undergo material changes. We cannot be certain that our allowance for loan losses will be adequate over time to cover credit losses in our portfolio because of unanticipated adverse changes in the economy, market conditions or events adversely affecting specific customers, industries or markets, or borrowers repaying their loans. Generally speaking, the credit quality of our borrowers can deteriorate as a result of economic downturns in our markets. Although the Florida economy is stable and growing, if the credit quality of our customer base or their debt service behavior materially decreases, if the risk profile of a market, industry or group of customers declines or weakness in the real estate markets and other economics were to arise, or if our allowance for loan losses is not adequate, our business, financial condition, including our liquidity and capital, and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. In addition, bank regulatory agencies periodically review our allowance for loan losses and may require an increase in the provision for loan losses or the recognition of loan charge-offs, based on judgments different than those of management. If charge-offs in future periods exceed the allowance for loan losses, we will need additional provisions to increase the allowance for loan losses, which would result in a decrease in net income and capital, and could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. We must effectively manage our information systems risk. We rely heavily on our communications and information systems to conduct our business. The financial services industry is undergoing rapid technological changes with frequent introductions of new technology-driven products, services and methods of delivery. Our ability to compete successfully depends in part upon our ability to use technology to provide products and services that will satisfy customer demands. We have and will continue to make technology investments to achieve process improvements and increase efficiency. Many of the Company’s competitors invest substantially greater resources in technological improvements than we do. We may not be able to effectively select, develop or implement new technology-driven products and services or be successful in marketing these products and services to our customers, which may negatively affect our business, results of operations or financial condition. Disruptions to our information systems or security breaches could adversely affect our business and reputation. Our communications and information systems remain vulnerable to unexpected disruptions and failures. Any failure or interruption of these systems could impair our ability to serve our customers and to operate our business and could damage our reputation, 19 result in a loss of business, subject us to additional regulatory scrutiny or enforcement or expose us to civil litigation and possible financial liability. While we have developed extensive recovery plans, we cannot assure that those plans will be effective to prevent adverse effects upon us and our customers resulting from system failures. While we maintain an insurance policy which we believe provides sufficient coverage at a manageable expense for an institution of our size and scope with similar technological systems, we cannot assure that this policy would be sufficient to cover all related financial losses and damages should we experience any one or more of our or a third party’s systems failing or experiencing a cyber-attack. We collect and store sensitive data, including personally identifiable information of our customers and employees as well as sensitive information related to our operations. Our collection of such Company and customer data is subject to extensive regulation and oversight. Computer break-ins of our systems or our customers’ systems, thefts of data and other breaches and criminal activity may result in significant costs to respond, liability for customer losses if we are at fault, damage to our customer relationships, regulatory scrutiny and enforcement and loss of future business opportunities due to reputational damage. Although we, with the help of third-party service providers, will continue to implement security technology and establish operational procedures to protect sensitive data, there can be no assurance that these measures will be effective. We advise and provide training to our customers regarding protection of their systems, but there is no assurance that our advice and training will be appropriately acted upon by our customers or effective to prevent losses. In some cases we may elect to contribute to the cost of responding to cybercrime against our customers, even when we are not at fault, in order to maintain valuable customer relationships. In our ordinary course of business, we rely on electronic communications and information systems to conduct our businesses and to store sensitive data, including financial information regarding our customers. The integrity of information systems of financial institutions are under significant threat from cyber-attacks by third parties, including through coordinated attacks sponsored by foreign nations and criminal organizations to disrupt business operations and other compromises to data and systems for political or criminal purposes. We employ an in-depth, layered, lines of defense approach that leverages people, processes and technology to manage and maintain cyber security and other information security controls. Notwithstanding the strength of our defensive measures, the threat from cyber-attacks is severe, attacks are sophisticated and attackers respond rapidly to changes in defensive measures , and there is no assurance that our response to any cyber-attack or system interruption, breach or failure will be fully effective to mitigate and remediate the issues resulting from such an event, including the costs, reputational harm and litigation challenges that we may face as a result. Cyber security risks may also occur with our third-party service providers, and may interfere with their ability to fulfill their contractual obligations to us, with attendant potential for financial loss or liability that could adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations. We offer our clients the ability to bank remotely and provide other technology based products and services, which services include the secure transmission of confidential information over the Internet and other remote channels. To the extent that our client’s systems are not secure or are otherwise compromised, our network could be vulnerable to unauthorized access, malicious software, phishing schemes and other security breaches. To the extent that our activities or the activities of our clients or third-party service providers involve the storage and transmission of confidential information, security breaches and malicious software could expose us to claims, regulatory scrutiny, litigation and other possible liabilities. While to date we have not experienced a significant compromise, significant data loss or material financial losses related to cyber security attacks, our systems and those of our clients and third- party service providers are under constant threat and it is possible that we could experience a significant event in the future. We may suffer material financial losses related to these risks in the future or we may be subject to liability for compromises to our client or third-party service provider systems. Any such losses or liabilities could adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations, and could expose us to reputation risk, the loss of client business, increased operational costs, as well as additional regulatory scrutiny, possible litigation, and related financial liability. These risks also include possible business interruption, including the inability to access critical information and systems. In addition, as the domestic and foreign regulatory environment related to information security, data collection and use, and privacy becomes increasingly rigorous, with new and constantly changing requirements applicable to our business, compliance with those requirements could also result in additional costs. We may be alleged to have infringed upon intellectual property rights owned by others, or may be unable to protect our intellectual property. Competitors or other third parties may allege that we, or consultants or other third parties retained or indemnified by us, infringe on their intellectual property rights. We also may face allegations that our employees have misappropriated intellectual property of their former employers or other third parties. Given the complex, rapidly changing and competitive technological and business environment in which we operate, and the potential risks and uncertainties of intellectual property-related litigation, an assertion of an infringement claim against us may cause us to spend significant amounts to defend the claim (even if we ultimately prevail); to pay significant money damages; to lose significant revenues; to be prohibited from using the relevant systems, processes, technologies or other intellectual property; to cease offering certain products or services or to incur significant license, royalty or technology development expenses. Moreover, it has become common in recent years for individuals and groups to purchase intellectual property assets for the sole purpose of making claims of infringement and attempting to extract settlements from 20 companies like ours. Even in instances where we believe that claims and allegations of intellectual property infringement against us are without merit, defending against such claims is time consuming and expensive and could result in the diversion of time and attention of our management and employees. In addition, although in some cases a third party may have agreed to indemnify us for such costs, such indemnifying party may refuse, or be unable, to uphold its contractual obligations. Moreover, we rely on a variety of measures to protect our intellectual property and proprietary information, including copyrights, trademarks and controls on access and distribution. These measures may not prevent misappropriation or infringement of our intellectual property or proprietary information and a resulting loss of competitive advantage, and in any event, we may be required to litigate to protect our intellectual property and proprietary information from misappropriation or infringement by others, which is expensive, could cause a diversion of resources and may not be successful. Third parties may challenge, invalidate or circumvent our intellectual property, or our intellectual property may not be sufficient to provide us with competitive advantages. In addition, the usage of branding that could be confused with ours could create negative perceptions and risks to our brand and reputation. Our competitors or other third parties may independently design around or develop technology similar to ours or otherwise duplicate our services or products such that we could not assert our intellectual property rights against them. In addition, our contractual arrangements may not effectively prevent disclosure of our intellectual property or confidential and proprietary information or provide an adequate remedy in the event of an unauthorized disclosure. Changes in U.S. trade policies and other factors beyond Seacoast's control, including the imposition of tariffs and retaliatory tariffs, may adversely impact its business, financial condition and results of operations. In recent years, there has been discussion and dialogue regarding potential changes to U.S. trade policies, legislation, treaties and tariffs, including trade policies and tariffs affecting other countries, including China, the European Union, Canada and Mexico and retaliatory tariffs by such countries. Tariffs and retaliatory tariffs have been imposed, and additional tariffs and retaliation tariffs have been proposed. Such tariffs, retaliatory tariffs or other trade restrictions on products and materials that Seacoast's customers import or export, including among others, agricultural products, could cause the prices of its customers' products to increase, which could reduce demand for such products, or reduce its customer margins, and adversely impact their revenues, financial results and ability to service debt. This, in turn, could adversely affect Seacoast's financial condition and results of operations. In addition, to the extent changes in the political environment have a negative impact on Seacoast or on the markets in which Seacoast operates its business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely impacted in the future. It remains unclear what the U.S. Administration or foreign governments will or will not do with respect to tariffs already imposed, additional tariffs that may be imposed, or international trade agreements and policies. On November 30, 2018, the United States, Canada and Mexico signed a new trade deal, the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement, to replace the North American Free Trade Agreement, which the President of the United States signed into law on January 29, 2020. The full impact of this agreement on Seacoast, its customers and on the economic conditions in its geographic markets is currently unknown. A trade war or other governmental action related to tariffs or international trade agreements or policies has the potential to negatively impact Seacoast's and/or its customers' costs, demand for its customers' products, and/or the U.S. economy or certain sectors thereof and, thus, adversely impact Seacoast's business, financial condition and results of operations. We operate in a heavily regulated environment. Regulatory compliance burdens and associated costs can affect our business. We and our subsidiaries are regulated by several regulators, including, but not limited to, the Federal Reserve, the OCC, the FDIC, the CFPB, the Small Business Administration, the SEC and NASDAQ. Our success is affected by state and federal regulations affecting banks and bank holding companies, the securities markets and banking, securities and insurance regulators. Banking regulations are primarily intended to protect consumers and depositors, not shareholders. The financial services industry also is subject to frequent legislative and regulatory changes and proposed changes, the effects of which cannot be predicted. These changes, if adopted, could require us to maintain more capital, liquidity and risk controls which could adversely affect our growth, profitability and financial condition. Any such changes in law can impact the profitability of our business activities, require changes to our operating policies and procedures, or otherwise adversely impact our business. The CFPB’s issued rules may have a negative impact on our loan origination process, and compliance and collection costs, which could adversely affect our mortgage lending operations and operating results. The CFPB has issued mortgage-related rules required under the Dodd-Frank Act addressing borrower ability-to-repay and qualified mortgage standards. The CFPB has also issued rules for loan originators related to compensation, licensing requirements, administration capabilities and restrictions on pursuance of delinquent borrowers. These rules could have a negative effect on the financial performance of Seacoast Bank’s mortgage lending operations such as limiting the volume of mortgage originations and sales into the secondary market, increased compliance burden and impairing Seacoast Bank’s ability to proceed against certain delinquent borrowers with timely and effective collection efforts. 21 Higher FDIC deposit insurance premiums and assessments could adversely affect our financial condition. FDIC insurance premiums we pay may change and be significantly higher in the future. Market developments may significantly deplete the insurance fund of the FDIC and reduce the ratio of reserves to insured deposits, thereby making it requisite upon the FDIC to charge higher premiums prospectively. Changes in accounting rules applicable to banks could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. From time to time, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) and the SEC change the financial accounting and reporting standards that govern the preparation of our financial statements. These changes can be hard to predict and can materially impact how we record and report our financial condition and results of operations. In some cases, we could be required to apply a new or revised standard retroactively, resulting in a restatement of our prior period financial statements. On January 1, 2020, we will implement FASB’s Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 326, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses. This guidance replaces the existing “incurred loss” methodology for financial assets measured at amortized cost, and introduces requirements to estimate current expected credit losses (“CECL”). Under the incurred loss methodology, credit losses are recognized only when the losses are probable or have been incurred; under CECL, companies are required to recognize the full amount of expected credit losses for the lifetime of the financial assets, based on historical experience, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. This change will require earlier recognition of credit losses that are deemed expected but not yet probable, and we expect will result in higher reserves for credit losses and higher volatility in the quarterly provision for credit losses in future periods. The CECL model also impacts the accounting for future bank acquisition activity by requiring the recognition of expected credit losses on acquired loans at the date of acquisition, in addition to the purchase discount, if any. With the exception of purchased loans with credit deterioration ("PCD"), this day-one recognition of the allowance for credit losses is recorded with an offset to net income. For PCD loans, the initial estimate of expected credit losses will be recognized as an adjustment to the amortized cost basis of the loan at acquisition (i.e., a balance sheet gross-up). Tax law changes may have an impact on net income, shareholders’ equity and the Company’s regulatory capital ratios. Under the Tax Reform Act, the highest marginal federal tax rate for corporations was lowered from 35% to 21%, resulting in a reduction to the Company’s deferred tax assets (“DTAs”) and a one-time adjustment increasing the provision for income taxes upon enactments in 2017. Additionally, in September 2019, the State of Florida announced a reduction in the corporate income tax rate from 5.5% to 4.458% for the years 2019, 2020 and 2021, resulting in a DTA write down of $1.1 million. We believe the initial impact of a reduction to the federal and state income tax rates and the resultant reduction to DTAs and capital, via higher tax provisioning at inception, will be recovered with lower tax provisioning prospectively from the date of inception. The reduction in our DTAs negatively impacted our capital ratios (as a small portion of our DTA is includable in regulatory capital calculations) but not below well-capitalized levels, as defined by our regulators. As higher net income is recorded due to lower tax provisioning and increases shareholders’ equity, the detrimental impact to capital ratios will diminish and accrete capital over time. While lower income tax rates should result in improved net income performance over prospective periods, the extent of the benefit will be influenced by the competitive environment and other factors. Our ability to realize our deferred tax assets may be reduced in the future if our estimates of future taxable income from our operations and tax planning strategies do not support our deferred tax amount. Additionally, the amount of net operating loss carry-forwards and certain other tax attributes realizable for income tax purposes may be reduced under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code (“Section 382”) by issuance of our capital securities or purchase of concentrations by investors. As of December 31, 2019, we had net DTAs of $16.5 million, based on management’s estimation of the likelihood of those DTAs being realized. These and future DTAs may be reduced in the future if our estimates of future taxable income from our operations and tax planning strategies do not support the amounts recorded. Management expects to realize the $16.5 million in net DTAs well in advance of the statutory carryforward period, based on its forecast of future taxable income. We consider positive and negative evidence, including the impact of reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, tax planning strategies and projected earnings within the statutory tax loss carryover period. This process requires significant judgment by management about matters that are by nature uncertain. If we were to conclude that significant portions of our DTAs were not more likely than not to be realized (due to operating results or other factors), a requirement to establish a valuation allowance could adversely affect our financial position and results of operations. The amount of net operating loss carry-forwards and certain other tax attributes realizable annually for income tax purposes may be reduced by an offering and/or other sales of our capital securities, including transactions in the open market by 5% or greater 22 shareholders, if an ownership change is deemed to occur under Section 382. The determination of whether an ownership change has occurred under Section 382 is highly fact-specific and can occur through one or more acquisitions of capital stock (including open market trading) if the result of such acquisitions is that the percentage of our outstanding common stock held by shareholders or groups of shareholders owning at least 5% of our common stock at the time of such acquisition, as determined under Section 382, is more than 50 percentage points higher than the lowest percentage of our outstanding common stock owned by such shareholders or groups of shareholders within the prior three-year period. Management does not believe any stock offerings, issuances, or reverse stock split have had any negative implications for the Company under Section 382 to date. The Federal Reserve has implemented significant economic strategies that have impacted interest rates, inflation, asset values, and the shape of the yield curve, over which the Company has no control and which the Company may not be able to adequately anticipate. In recent years, in response to the recession in 2008 and the following uneven recovery, the Federal Reserve implemented a series of domestic monetary initiatives. Several of these have emphasized so-called quantitative easing strategies, the most recent of which ended during 2014. Since then the Federal Reserve raised rates nine times during 2015-2018, and reduced rates three times in 2019. Further rate changes reportedly are dependent on the Federal Reserve’s assessment of economic data as it becomes available. The Company cannot predict the nature or timing of future changes in monetary, economic, or other policies or the effect that they may have on the Company's business activities, financial condition and results of operations. Future acquisition and expansion activities may disrupt our business, dilute existing shareholders and adversely affect our operating results. We periodically evaluate potential acquisitions and expansion opportunities. To the extent we grow through acquisition, we cannot assure you that we will be able to adequately or profitably manage this growth. Acquiring other banks, branches or businesses, as well as other geographic and product expansion activities, involve various risks including: • • • • • • • • • • • • risks of unknown or contingent liabilities; unanticipated costs and delays; risks that acquired new businesses do not perform consistent with our growth and profitability expectations; risks of entering new market or product areas where we have limited experience; risks that growth will strain our infrastructure, staff, internal controls and management, which may require additional personnel, time and expenditures; exposure to potential asset quality issues with acquired institutions; difficulties, expenses and delays of integrating the operations and personnel of acquired institutions, and start-up delays and costs of other expansion activities; potential disruptions to our business; possible loss of key employees and customers of acquired institutions; potential short-term decrease in profitability; inaccurate estimates of value assigned to acquired assets; and diversion of our management’s time and attention from our existing operations and businesses. Attractive acquisition opportunities may not be available to us in the future. While we seek continued organic growth, we anticipate continuing to evaluate merger and acquisition opportunities presented to us in our core markets and beyond. The number of financial institutions headquartered in Florida, the Southeastern United States, and across the country continues to decline through merger and other activity. We expect that other banking and financial companies, many of which have significantly greater resources, will compete with us to acquire financial services businesses. This competition, as the number of appropriate merger targets decreases, could increase prices for potential acquisitions which could reduce our potential returns, and reduce the attractiveness of these opportunities to us. Also, acquisitions are subject to various regulatory approvals. If we fail to receive the appropriate regulatory approvals, we will not be able to consummate an acquisition that we believe is in our best interests. Among other things, our regulators consider our capital, liquidity, profitability, regulatory compliance, including with respect to anti-money laundering ("AML") obligations, consumer protection laws and CRA obligations and levels of goodwill and intangibles when considering acquisition and expansion proposals. Any acquisition could be dilutive to our earnings and shareholders’ equity per share of our common stock. 23 Our business strategy includes significant growth plans, and our financial condition and results of operations could be negatively affected if we fail to grow or fail to manage our growth effectively. We intend to continue to pursue an organic growth strategy for our business while also regularly evaluating potential acquisitions and expansion opportunities. If appropriate opportunities present themselves, we expect to engage in selected acquisitions of financial institutions, branch acquisitions and other business growth initiatives or undertakings. There can be no assurance that we will successfully identify appropriate opportunities, that we will be able to negotiate or finance such activities or that such activities, if undertaken, will be successful. There are risks associated with our growth strategy. To the extent that we grow through acquisitions, there can be no assurance that we will be able to adequately or profitably manage this growth. Acquiring other banks, branches or other assets, as well as other expansion activities, involves various risks including the risks of incorrectly assessing the credit quality of acquired assets, encountering greater than expected costs of integrating acquired banks or branches into us, the risk of loss of customers and/or employees of the acquired institution or branch, executing cost savings measures, not achieving revenue enhancements and otherwise not realizing the transaction’s anticipated benefits. Our ability to address these matters successfully cannot be assured. In addition, our strategic efforts may divert resources or management’s attention from ongoing business operations, may require investment in integration and in development and enhancement of additional operational and reporting processes and controls and may subject us to additional regulatory scrutiny. Our growth initiatives may also require us to recruit and retain experienced personnel to assist in such initiatives. Accordingly, the failure to identify and retain such personnel would place significant limitations on our ability to successfully execute our growth strategy. In addition, to the extent we expand our lending beyond our current market areas, we could incur additional risks related to those new market areas. We may not be able to expand our market presence in our existing market areas or successfully enter new markets. If we do not successfully execute our acquisition growth plan, it could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, reputation and growth prospects. In addition, if we were to conclude that the value of an acquired business had decreased, that conclusion may result in an impairment charge to goodwill or other tangible or intangible assets, which would adversely affect our results of operations. While we believe we have the executive management resources and internal systems in place to successfully manage our future growth, there can be no assurance growth opportunities will be available or that we will successfully manage our growth. Additionally, we may pursue divestitures of non-strategic branches or other assets. Such divestitures involve various risks, including the risks of not being able to timely or fully replace liquidity previously provided by deposits which may be transferred as part of a divestiture, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. We may not be able to successfully integrate our acquisitions or to realize the anticipated benefits of them. A successful integration of each acquired bank with ours will depend substantially on our ability to successfully consolidate operations, corporate cultures, systems and procedures and to eliminate redundancies and costs. While we have substantial experience in successfully integrating institutions we have acquired, we may encounter difficulties during integration, such as: • • • • • • the loss of key employees; the disruption of operations and businesses; loan and deposit attrition, customer loss and revenue loss; possible inconsistencies in standards, control procedures and policies; unexpected issues with expected branch closures; and/or unexpected issues with costs, operations, personnel, technology and credit; all of which could divert resources from regular banking operations. Additionally, general market and economic conditions or governmental actions affecting the financial industry generally may inhibit our successful merger integrations. Further, we acquire banks with the expectation that these mergers will result in various benefits including, among other things, benefits relating to enhanced revenues, a strengthened market position for the combined company, cross selling opportunities, technology, cost savings and operating efficiencies. Achieving the anticipated benefits of these mergers is subject to a number of uncertainties, including whether we integrate these institutions in an efficient and effective manner, and general competitive factors in the marketplace. Failure to achieve these anticipated benefits could result in a reduction in the price of our shares as well as in 24 increased costs, decreases in the amount of expected revenues and diversion of management's time and energy and could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results. The implementation of other new lines of business or new products and services may subject us to additional risk. We continuously evaluate our service offerings and may implement new lines of business or offer new products and services within existing lines of business in the future. There are substantial risks and uncertainties associated with these efforts. In developing and marketing new lines of business and/or new products and services, we undergo a process to assess the risks of the initiative, and invest significant time and resources to build internal controls, policies and procedures to mitigate those risks, including hiring experienced management to oversee the implementation of the initiative. Initial timetables for the introduction and development of new lines of business and/or new products or services may not be achieved and price and profitability targets may not prove feasible. External factors, such as compliance with regulations, competitive alternatives, and shifting market preferences, may also impact the successful implementation of a new line of business and/or a new product or service. Furthermore, any new line of business and/or new product or service could require the establishment of new key and other controls and have a significant impact on our existing system of internal controls. Failure to successfully manage these risks in the development and implementation of new lines of business and/or new products or services could have a material adverse effect on our business and, in turn, our financial condition and results of operations. Liquidity risks could affect operations and jeopardize our financial condition. Liquidity is essential to our business. An inability to raise funds through deposits, borrowings, the sale of loans and other sources could have a substantial negative effect on our liquidity. Our funding sources include customer deposits, federal funds purchases, securities sold under repurchase agreements, and short- and long-term debt. We are also members of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta (the “FHLB”) and the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, where we can obtain advances collateralized with eligible assets. We maintain a portfolio of securities that can be used as a secondary source of liquidity. Other sources of liquidity available to us or Seacoast Bank include the acquisition of additional deposits, the issuance and sale of debt securities, and the issuance and sale of preferred or common securities in public or private transactions. Our access to funding sources in amounts adequate or on terms which are acceptable to us could be impaired by other factors that affect us specifically or the financial services industry or economy in general. Factors that could detrimentally impact our access to liquidity sources include a downturn in the markets in which our loans are concentrated or adverse regulatory action against us. In addition, our access to deposits may be affected by the liquidity and/or cash flow needs of depositors. Although we have historically been able to replace maturing deposits and FHLB advances as necessary, we might not be able to replace such funds in the future and can lose a relatively inexpensive source of funds and increase our funding costs if, among other things, customers move funds out of bank deposits and into alternative investments, such as the stock market, that may be perceived as providing superior expected returns. We may be required to seek additional regulatory capital through capital raises at terms that may be very dilutive to existing shareholders. Our ability to borrow could also be impaired by factors that are not specific to us, such as disruptions in the financial markets or negative views and expectations about the prospects for the financial services industry. Our ability to receive dividends from our subsidiaries could affect our liquidity and ability to pay interest on our trust preferred securities or reinstate dividends. We are a legal entity separate and distinct from Seacoast Bank and our other subsidiaries. Our primary source of cash, other then securities offerings, is dividends from Seacoast Bank. These dividends are the principal source of funds to pay dividends on our common stock, interest on our trust preferred securities and interest and principal on our debt. Various laws and regulations limit the amount of dividends that Seacoast Bank may pay us, as further described in "Supervision and Regulation - Payment of Dividends". Also, our right to participate in a distribution of assets upon a subsidiary’s liquidation or reorganization is subject to the prior claims of the subsidiary’s creditors. Limitations on our ability to receive dividends from our subsidiaries could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity and on our ability to pay dividends on common stock. Additionally, if our subsidiaries’ earnings are not sufficient to make dividend payments to us while maintaining adequate capital levels, we may not be able to make payments on our trust preferred securities or reinstate dividend payments to our common shareholders. We must effectively manage our interest rate risk. The impact of changing interest rates on our results is difficult to predict and changes in interest rates may impact our performance in ways we cannot predict. Our profitability is dependent to a large extent on our net interest income, which is the difference between the interest income paid to us on our loans and investments and the interest we pay to third parties such as our depositors, lenders and debt holders. Changes in interest rates can impact our profits and the fair values of certain of our assets and liabilities. Prolonged periods of unusually 25 low interest rates may have an incrementally adverse effect on our earnings by reducing yields on loans and other earning assets over time. Increases in market interest rates may reduce our customers’ desire to borrow money from us or adversely affect their ability to repay their outstanding loans by increasing their debt service obligations through the periodic reset of adjustable interest rate loans. If our borrowers’ ability to pay their loans is impaired by increasing interest payment obligations, our level of nonperforming assets would increase, producing an adverse effect on operating results. Increases in interest rates can have a material impact on the volume of mortgage originations and re-financings, adversely affecting the profitability of our mortgage finance business. Interest rate risk can also result from mismatches between the dollar amounts of re-pricing or maturing assets and liabilities and from mismatches in the timing and rates at which our assets and liabilities re-price. We actively monitor and manage the balances of our maturing and re-pricing assets and liabilities to reduce the adverse impact of changes in interest rates, but there can be no assurance that we will be able to avoid material adverse effects on our net interest margin in all market conditions. Federal prohibitions on the ability of financial institutions to pay interest on commercial demand deposit accounts were repealed in 2011 by the Dodd-Frank Act. This change has had limited impact to date due to the excess of commercial liquidity and the very low rate environment in recent years. There can be no assurance that we will not be materially adversely affected in the future if economic activity increases and interest rates rise, which may result in our interest expense increasing, and our net interest margin decreasing, if we must offer interest on commercial demand deposits to attract or retain customer deposits. Interest rates on our outstanding financial instruments might be subject to change based on regulatory developments, which could adversely affect our revenue, expenses, and the value of those financial instruments. LIBOR and certain other “benchmarks” are the subject of recent national, international, and other regulatory guidance and proposals for reform. These reforms may cause such benchmarks to perform differently than in the past or have other consequences which cannot be predicted. On July 27, 2017, the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority, which regulates LIBOR, publicly announced that it intends to stop persuading or compelling banks to submit LIBOR rates after 2021. It is unclear whether, at that time, LIBOR will cease to exist or if new methods of calculating LIBOR will be established. If LIBOR ceases to exist or if the methods of calculating LIBOR change from current methods for any reason, interest rates on our floating rate obligations, loans, deposits, derivatives, and other financial instruments tied to LIBOR rates, as well as the revenue and expenses associated with those financial instruments, may be adversely affected. Any uncertainty regarding the continued use and reliability of LIBOR as a benchmark interest rate could adversely affect the value of our floating rate obligations, loans, deposits, derivatives, and other financial instruments tied to LIBOR rates. A portion of our variable rate loans are tied to LIBOR. While many of these loans contain “fallback” provisions providing for alternative rate calculations in the event LIBOR is unavailable, not all of our loans contain these “fallback” provisions and existing “fallback” provisions may not adequately address the actual changes to LIBOR or successor rates. We may not be able to successfully amend these loans to provide for alternative rate calculations and such amendments could prove costly. Even with “fallback” provisions, changes to or the discontinuance of LIBOR could result in customer uncertainty and disputes around how variable rates should be calculated. All of this could result in damage to our reputation, loss of customers and additional costs to us, all of which could be material. Great Britain’s exit from the European Union (“Brexit”) could adversely affect financial markets generally. The uncertainty regarding Brexit could adversely affect financial markets generally. While Seacoast has no direct loans to or deposits from foreign entities, the uncertain impact of Brexit on British and European businesses, financial markets, and related businesses in the United States could also adversely affect financial markets generally. The commercial soundness of many financial institutions may be closely interrelated as a result of relationships between the institutions. As a result, concerns about, or a default or threatened default by, one institution could lead to significant market-wide liquidity and credit problems, losses or defaults by other institutions. Seacoast’s business could be adversely affected directly by the default of another institution or if the financial services industry experiences significant market-wide liquidity and credit problems. We are required to maintain capital to meet regulatory requirements, and if we fail to maintain sufficient capital, whether due to losses, growth opportunities, or an inability to raise additional capital or otherwise, our financial condition, liquidity and results of operations, as well as our compliance with regulatory requirements, would be adversely affected. Both we and Seacoast Bank must meet regulatory capital requirements and maintain sufficient liquidity and our regulators may modify and adjust such requirements in the future. Our ability to raise additional capital, when and if needed in the future, will depend on conditions in the capital markets, general economic conditions and a number of other factors, including investor perceptions regarding the banking industry and the market, governmental activities, many of which are outside our control, and on our financial condition and performance. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that we will be able to raise additional capital if needed or on terms acceptable to us. If we fail to meet these capital and other regulatory requirements, our financial condition, liquidity and results of operations would be materially and adversely affected. 26 Although the Company currently complies with all capital requirements, we will be subject to more stringent regulatory capital ratio requirements in the future and we may need additional capital in order to meet those requirements. Our failure to remain “well capitalized” for bank regulatory purposes could affect customer confidence, our ability to grow, our costs of funds and FDIC insurance costs, our ability to resume payments of dividends on common stock, make distributions on our trust preferred securities, our ability to make acquisitions, and our business, results of operations and financial condition, generally. Under FDIC rules, if Seacoast Bank ceases to be a “well capitalized” institution for bank regulatory purposes, its ability to accept brokered deposits and the interest rates that it pays may both be restricted. Our cost of funds may increase as a result of general economic conditions, FDIC insurance assessments, interest rates and competitive pressures. We have traditionally obtained funds through local deposits and thus we have a base of lower cost transaction deposits. Generally, we believe local deposits are a cheaper and more stable source of funds than other borrowings because interest rates paid for local deposits are typically lower than interest rates charged for borrowings from other institutional lenders and reflect a mix of transaction and time deposits, whereas brokered deposits typically are higher cost time deposits. Our costs of funds and our profitability and liquidity are likely to be adversely affected if, and to the extent, we have to rely upon higher cost borrowings from other institutional lenders or brokers to fund loan demand or liquidity needs, and changes in our deposit mix and growth could adversely affect our profitability and the ability to expand our loan portfolio. Federal banking agencies periodically conduct examinations of our business, including for compliance with laws and regulations, and our failure to comply with any supervisory actions to which we are or become subject as a result of such examinations may adversely affect us. The Federal Reserve and the OCC periodically conduct examinations of our business and Seacoast Bank’s business, including for compliance with laws and regulations, and Seacoast Bank also may be subject to future regulatory examinations by the CFPB as discussed in the “Supervision and Regulation” section above. If, as a result of an examination, the Federal Reserve, the OCC and/ or the CFPB were to determine that the financial condition, capital resources, asset quality, asset concentrations, earnings prospects, management, liquidity, sensitivity to market risk, or other aspects of any of our or Seacoast Bank’s operations had become unsatisfactory, or that we or our management were in violation of any law, regulation or guideline in effect from time to time, the regulators may take a number of different remedial actions as they deem appropriate. These actions include the power to enjoin “unsafe or unsound” practices, to require affirmative actions to correct any conditions resulting from any violation or practice, to issue an administrative order that can be judicially enforced, to direct an increase in our capital, to restrict our growth, to change the composition of our concentrations in portfolio or balance sheet assets, to assess civil monetary penalties against our officers or directors or to remove officers and directors. We are dependent on key personnel and the loss of one or more of those key personnel could harm our business. Our future success significantly depends on the continued services and performance of our key management personnel. We believe our management team’s depth and breadth of experience in the banking industry is integral to executing our business plan. We also will need to continue to attract, motivate and retain other key personnel. The loss of the services of members of our senior management team or other key employees or the inability to attract additional qualified personnel as needed could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows. Employee misconduct could expose us to significant legal liability and reputational harm. We are vulnerable to reputational harm because we operate in an industry in which integrity and the confidence of our customers are of critical importance. Our employees could engage in fraudulent, illegal, wrongful or suspicious activities, and/or activities resulting in consumer harm that adversely affects our customers and/or our business. The precautions we take to detect and prevent such misconduct may not always be effective, such misconduct may result in regulatory sanctions and/or penalties, serious harm to our reputation, financial condition, customer relationships or the ability to attract new customers. In addition, improper use or disclosure of confidential information by our employees, even if inadvertent, could result in serious harm to our reputation, financial condition and current and future business relationships. The precautions we take to detect and prevent such misconduct may not always be effective. We are subject to losses due to fraudulent and negligent acts on the part of loan applicants, mortgage brokers, other vendors and our employees. When we originate loans, we rely heavily upon information supplied by loan applicants and third parties, including the information contained in the loan application, property appraisal, title information and employment and income documentation provided by 27 third parties. If any of this information is misrepresented and such misrepresentation is not detected prior to loan funding, we generally bear the risk of loss associated with the misrepresentation. We are subject to internal control reporting requirements that increase compliance costs and failure to comply with such requirements could adversely affect our reputation and the value of our securities. We are required to comply with various corporate governance and financial reporting requirements under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as rules and regulations adopted by the SEC, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and NASDAQ. In particular, we are required to include management and independent registered public accounting firm reports on internal controls as part of our Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. The SEC also has proposed a number of new rules or regulations requiring additional disclosure, such as lower-level employee compensation. We expect to continue to spend significant amounts of time and money on compliance with these rules. Our failure to track and comply with the various rules may materially adversely affect our reputation, ability to obtain the necessary certifications to financial statements, and the value of our securities. Our controls and procedures may fail or be circumvented. Management regularly reviews and updates our internal controls over financial reporting, disclosure controls and procedures, and corporate governance policies and procedures. Any system of controls, however well designed and operated, is based in part on certain assumptions and can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurances that the objectives of the system are met. Any failure or circumvention of our controls and procedures or failure to comply with regulations related to controls and procedures could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Our operations rely on external vendors. We rely on certain external vendors to provide products and services necessary to maintain our day-to-day operations, particularly in the areas of operations, treasury management systems, information technology and security, exposing us to the risk that these vendors will not perform as required by our agreements. An external vendor’s failure to perform in accordance with our agreement could be disruptive to our operations, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Our regulators also impose requirements on us with respect to monitoring and implementing adequate controls and procedures in connection with our third party vendors. From time to time, we may decide to retain new vendors for new or existing products and services. Transition to these new vendors may not proceed as anticipated and could negatively impact our customers or our ability to conduct business, which, in turn, could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. To mitigate this risk, the Company has an established process to oversee vendor relationships. The anti-takeover provisions in our Articles of Incorporation and under Florida law may make it more difficult for takeover attempts that have not been approved by our board of directors. Florida law and our Articles of Incorporation include anti-takeover provisions, such as provisions that encourage persons seeking to acquire control of us to consult with our board of directors, and which enable the board of directors to negotiate and give consideration on behalf of us and our shareholders and other constituencies to the merits of any offer made. Such provisions, as well as supermajority voting and quorum requirements, and a staggered board of directors, may make any takeover attempts and other acquisitions of interests in us, by means of a tender offer, open market purchase, a proxy fight or otherwise, that have not been approved by our board of directors more difficult and more expensive. These provisions may discourage possible business combinations that a majority of our shareholders may believe to be desirable and beneficial. As a result, our board of directors may decide not to pursue transactions that would otherwise be in the best interests of holders of our common stock. Hurricanes or other adverse weather events could negatively affect our local economies or disrupt our operations, which would have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations. Our market areas in Florida are susceptible to hurricanes, tropical storms and related flooding and wind damage. Such weather events can disrupt operations, result in damage to properties and negatively affect the local economies in the markets where we operate. We cannot predict whether or to what extent damage that may be caused by future hurricanes will affect our operations or the economies in our current or future market areas, but such weather events could result in a decline in loan originations, a decline in the value or destruction of properties securing our loans and an increase in delinquencies, foreclosures or loan losses. Our business and results of operations may be adversely affected by these and other negative effects of future hurricanes, tropical storms, related flooding and wind damage and other similar weather events. As a result of the potential for such weather events, many of our customers have incurred significantly higher property and casualty insurance premiums on their properties located 28 in our markets, which may adversely affect real estate sales and values in our markets. Climate change may be increasing the nature, severity, and frequency of adverse weather conditions, making the impact from these types of natural disasters on us or customers worse. Societal responses to climate change could adversely affect our business and performance, including indirectly through impacts on our customers. Concerns over the long-term impacts of climate change have led and will continue to lead to governmental efforts around the world to mitigate those impacts. Consumers and businesses also may change their behavior on their own as a result of these concerns. Seacoast and its customers will need to respond to new laws and regulations as well as consumer and business preferences resulting from climate change concerns. We and our customers may face cost increases, asset value reductions, operating process changes, and the like. The impact on our customers will likely vary depending on their specific attributes, including reliance on or role in carbon intensive activities. Among the impacts to Seacoast could be a drop in demand for our products and services, particularly in certain sectors. In addition, we could face reductions in creditworthiness on the part of some customers or in the value of assets securing loans. Our efforts to take these risks into account in making lending and other decisions, including by increasing our business with climate-friendly companies, may not be effective in protecting us from the negative impact of new laws and regulations or changes in consumer or business behavior. Risks Related to our Common Stock We may issue additional shares of common or preferred stock, which may dilute the interests of our shareholders and may adversely affect the market price of our common stock. We are currently authorized to issue up to 120 million shares of common stock, of which 51.5 million shares were outstanding as of December 31, 2019, and up to 4 million shares of preferred stock, of which no shares are outstanding. Subject to certain NASDAQ requirements, our board of directors has authority, without action or vote of the shareholders, to issue all or part of the remaining authorized but unissued shares and to establish the terms of any series of preferred stock. These authorized but unissued shares could be issued on terms or in circumstances that could dilute the interests of other shareholders. Our stock price is subject to fluctuations, and the value of your investment may decline. The trading price of our common stock is subject to wide fluctuations and may be subject to fluctuations in the future. The stock market in general, and the market for the stocks of commercial banks and other financial services companies in particular, has experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that sometimes have been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of those companies. These broad market and industry factors may seriously harm the market price of our common stock, regardless of our operating performance, and the value of your investment may decline. Securities analysts might not continue coverage on our common stock, which could adversely affect the market for our common stock. The trading price of our common stock depends in part on the research and reports that securities analysts publish about us and our business. We do not have any control over these analysts, and they may not continue to cover our common stock. If securities analysts do not continue to cover our common stock, the lack of research coverage may adversely affect its market price. If securities analysts continue to cover our common stock, and our common stock is the subject of an unfavorable report, the price of our common stock may decline. If one or more of these analysts cease to cover us or fail to publish regular reports on us, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which could cause the price or trading volume of our common stock to decline. Offerings of debt, which would rank senior to our common stock upon liquidation, may adversely affect the market price of our common stock. We may attempt to increase our capital resources or, if our or Seacoast Bank’s regulatory capital ratios fall below the required minimums, we could be forced to raise additional capital by making additional offerings of debt or equity securities, senior or subordinated notes, preferred stock and common stock. Upon liquidation, holders of our debt securities and lenders with respect to other borrowings will receive distributions of our available assets prior to the holders of our common stock. Shares of our common stock are not insured deposits and may lose value. Shares of our common stock are not savings accounts, deposits or other obligations of any depository institution and are not insured or guaranteed by the FDIC or any other governmental agency or instrumentality, any other deposit insurance fund or by any other public or private entity, and are subject to investment risk, including the possible loss of principal. 29 Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments None. Item 2. Properties Seacoast maintains its corporate headquarters in a 68,000 square foot, three story building at 815 Colorado Avenue in Stuart, Florida. The building is owned by Seacoast Bank. Seacoast Bank owns or leases all of the buildings in which its business operates. At December 31, 2019, Seacoast Bank and its subsidiaries had 48 branch offices, nine commercial lending offices, and its main office in Florida. For additional information regarding properties, please refer to Notes G and K of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Item 3. Legal Proceedings The Company and its subsidiaries are subject, in the ordinary course, to litigation incidental to the businesses in which they are engaged. Management presently believes that none of the legal proceedings to which they are a party are likely to have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial position, operating results or cash flows, although no assurance can be given with respect to the ultimate outcome of any such claim or litigation. Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures Not applicable. Part II Item 5. Market For Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities Holders of the Company's common stock are entitled to one vote per share on all matters presented to shareholders as provided in our Articles of Incorporation. The Company's common stock is traded under the symbol “SBCF” on the NASDAQ Global Select Market, which is a national securities exchange (“NASDAQ”). As of January 31, 2020, there were 51,523,499 shares of common stock outstanding, held by approximately 2,152 record holders. Dividends from Seacoast Bank are the Company's primary source of funds to pay dividends on its common stock. Under the National Bank Act, national banks may in any calendar year, without the approval of the OCC, pay dividends to the extent of net profits for that year, plus retained net profits for the preceding two years (less any required transfers to surplus). The need to maintain adequate capital in Seacoast Bank also limits dividends that may be paid to the Company. Additional information regarding restrictions on the ability of Seacoast Bank to pay dividends to the Company is contained in Note C of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. See “Item 1. Business- Payment of Dividends” of this Form 10-K for information with respect to the regulatory restrictions on dividends. Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans See the information included under Part III, Item 12, which is incorporated in response to this item by reference. Item 6. Selected Financial Data Five years of selected financial data of the Company is set forth commencing on page 75. 30 Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations The purpose of this discussion and analysis is to aid in understanding the financial condition, significant changes in the financial condition and the results of operations of Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida and its subsidiaries ("Seacoast" or the “Company”). Nearly all of the Company’s operations are contained in its banking subsidiary, Seacoast Bank (“Seacoast Bank” or the “Bank”). This discussion and analysis is intended to highlight and supplement information presented elsewhere in the annual report on Form 10-K, particularly the consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing in Item 8. The focus of this discussion is on the Company’s financial statements and other statistical data for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018. Additional information about the Company’s financial condition and results of operations in 2017 and changes in the Company’s financial condition and results of operations from 2017 to 2018 may be found in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018. For purposes of the following discussion, the words "Seacoast," the“Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to the combined entities of Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida and its direct and indirect wholly owned subsidiaries. Overview – Strategy and Results Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida (“Seacoast” or the “Company”), a financial holding company, incorporated in Florida in 1983, and registered under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the “BHC Act”), is one of the largest community banks in Florida with approximately $7.1 billion in assets and $5.6 billion in deposits as of December 31, 2019. The Company provides integrated financial services including commercial and retail banking, wealth management, and mortgage services to customers through advanced banking solutions, 48 traditional branches of its locally-branded wholly-owned subsidiary bank, Seacoast National Bank (“Seacoast Bank”), a national banking association, and nine commercial banking centers. Seacoast operates primarily in Florida, with concentrations in the state's fastest growing markets, each with unique characteristics and opportunities. The Company's offices stretch from the southeast, including Fort Lauderdale, Boca Raton and Palm Beach north along the east coast to the Daytona area, into Orlando and Central Florida and the adjacent Tampa market, and west to Okeechobee and surrounding counties. The Company delivers integrated banking services, combining traditional retail locations with online and mobile technology and a convenient telephone banking center. Seacoast has built a fully integrated distribution platform across all channels to provide customers with the ability to choose their path of convenience to satisfy their banking needs, providing the Company an opportunity to reach customers through a variety of sales channels. The Company believes its digital delivery and products are contributing to growing the franchise. Adoption of personal and business mobile banking has grown 59% in the past two years and online banking users have grown 31%. Seacoast is executing a balanced growth strategy, combining both organic growth with strategic acquisitions in Florida's most attractive growing markets. In Orlando, Seacoast is now the largest Florida-based bank and a top-10 bank in the Orlando market overall. In other key markets, including Palm Beach County, Fort Lauderdale, and Tampa, the Company has enhanced its footprint with eight acquisitions since 2014, generating continued expansion and strengthening market share, increasing the customer base and lowering operating costs through economies of scale. In the fourth quarter of 2019, the Company announced the upcoming acquisition of First Bank of the Palm Beaches ("First Bank"), building upon two previous acquisitions in Palm Beach, one of Florida's top counties by population and household income. Additionally, in the first quarter of 2020, the Company announced the upcoming acquisition of Fourth Street Banking Company, the holding company for Freedom Bank in St. Petersburg, Florida, again expanding upon the benefits of two previous acquisitions in the market. The Tampa MSA is, by population, among the top 20 in the nation. These acquisitions are expected to be completed in the first half of 2020 and are expected to provide earnings per share accretion of more than 5% to 2021 and thereafter. The Company's acquisition strategy has not only increased customer households and been immediately accretive to earnings, but also has opened markets and customer bases where Seacoast's convenience offering resonates. The table below summarizes acquisition activity in recent years: 31 Acquired Loans 248,948 Acquired Deposits 276,401 $ 171,681 624,289 268,633 182,443 285,350 314,248 337,341 188,469 516,297 150,228 631,497 270,318 136,832 250,876 62,671 266,137 111,292 365,363 $ April 7, 2017 October 20, 2017 October 19, 2018 First Quarter 2020 November 3, 2017 Date of Acquisition Second Quarter 2020 (In thousands) Freedom Bank1 (acquisition pending) First Bank of the Palm Beaches2 (acquisition pending) First Green Bank3 Palm Beach Community Bank NorthStar Bank4 GulfShore Bank5 BMO Harris6 Floridian Bank7 Grand Bank & Trust of Florida8 BankFirst9 1Wholly-owned subsidiary of Fourth Street Banking Company. Loan and deposit balances as of September 30, 2019 2Loan and deposit balances as of September 30, 2019 3Wholly-owned subsidiary of First Green Bancorp, Inc. 4Wholly-owned subsidiary of NorthStar Banking Corporation, Inc. 5Wholly-owned subsidiary of GulfShore BancShares, Inc. 6Orlando banking operations of BMO Harris Bank, N.A. 7Wholly-owned subsidiary of Floridian Financial Group, Inc. 8Wholly-owned subsidiary of Grand Bankshares, Inc. 9Wholly-owned subsidiary of BANKshares, Inc. October 1, 2014 March 11, 2016 July 17, 2015 June 3, 2016 2019 Highlights • 15% year-over-year growth in revenue on a GAAP basis enhanced by a 1% decrease in noninterest expense on the same basis. 14% year-over-year adjusted revenue1 growth during 2019 combined with a 3% increase in adjusted noninterest expense1 over the corresponding period. • Diluted earnings per share of $1.90 for 2019, compared to $1.38 diluted earnings per share for 2018 on a GAAP basis. Achievement of the $2.01 adjusted diluted earnings per share1 goal for 2019. • Consistent growth in tangible book value per share, ending the period at $14.76, up 20% over the prior year. • Continuation of the Company’s analytics-driven product marketing and service delivery combined with a favorable Florida economy that drove record loan production; total loans increased 8% compared to a year ago; excluding acquired loans, total loans were 3% higher year-over-year. • The Company continued execution of its balanced growth strategy through successful integration of the acquisition of First Green on October 19, 2018, together with organic and acquisition-related revenue growth momentum and cost reductions, which drove further growth throughout 2019. • Consolidated three banking center locations in 2019, achieving the Vision 2020 objective of reducing the footprint by 20% to meet evolving customer needs. In 2018, the addition of seven branches from acquisition was offset by the consolidation of seven branches. Deposits per branch improved, with total deposits per banking center exceeding $116.3 million at December 31, 2019, up from $101.5 million one year earlier. • Continued discipline around expenses, primarily achieved through focus on reducing overhead and streamlining business and cost savings processes. These reductions have allowed the Company to reallocate overhead to hiring additional bankers in Tampa and South Florida and technology investments in 2019, which will continue to support growth and operating leverage into 2020. 1Non-GAAP measure - see "Explanation of Certain Unaudited Non-GAAP Financial Measures" for more information and a reconciliation to GAAP. 32 Results of Operations Earnings Summary Net income in 2019 totaled $98.7 million, or $1.90 diluted earnings per share, compared to $67.3 million, or $1.38 diluted earnings per share, in 2018. Return on average assets (“ROA”) increased to 1.45% and return on average equity (“ROE”) increased to 10.63% in 2019 compared to 1.11% and 9.08% in 2018. Adjusted net income1 in 2019 totaled $104.6 million, an increase of $25.5 million, or 32%, compared to $79.1 million in 2018. Adjusted diluted earnings per share1 increased to $2.01 in 2019 compared to $1.62 in 2018. Return on average tangible assets Return on average tangible shareholders' equity Efficiency ratio Quarter First 2019 1.48% 14.86 56.55 Second 2019 1.50% 14.30 53.48 Third 2019 1.61% 14.73 48.62 Fourth 2019 1.66% 14.95 48.36 Total 2019 2018 1.56% 1.20% 14.72 51.71 12.54 59.98 Adjusted return on average tangible assets1 Adjusted return on average tangible shareholders' equity1 Adjusted efficiency ratio1 1Non-GAAP measure - see "Explanation of Certain Unaudited Non-GAAP Financial Measures" for more information and a reconciliation to GAAP. 1.58% 14.93 1.57% 14.19 1.50% 15.11 1.67% 15.30 1.59% 15.17 55.81 48.96 47.52 51.44 50.90 1.35% 14.06 56.13 For the year ended December 31, 2019, adjusted return on average tangible assets1 and adjusted return on average tangible shareholders' equity1 improved when compared to the same period in the prior year. This improvement is the result of higher adjusted net income1 in 2019, partially offset by higher tangible assets and higher tangible shareholders' equity. The improvement in the efficiency ratios reflects the Company's disciplined expense control and focus on increasing net revenue (interest and noninterest income combined). Net Interest Income and Margin Net interest income (on a fully taxable equivalent basis) for the year ended December 31, 2019 totaled $244.0 million, increasing $32.0 million, or 15%, compared to the year ended December 31, 2018. In 2019 and 2018, net interest margin was 3.92% and 3.85%, respectively. In 2019, net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis and the net interest margin continued to benefit from a positive remixing of interest earning assets as well as actions taken to actively manage cost of deposits, including offering shorter maturities and aligning rates lower along with reductions in the federal funds rate in the second half of 2019. Net interest margin increased 7 basis points during the year. Loans and security yields increased by 21 and 7 basis points, respectively, while cost of deposits increased by 26 basis points.The impact on net interest margin from accretion of purchase discount on acquired loans was 31 basis points in 2019 compared to 28 basis points in 2018. Additionally, 2019 net interest income continued to benefit from the full year impact of the First Green acquisition completed in the fourth quarter of 2018. Table 2 presents the Company’s average balance sheets, interest income and expenses, and yields and rates, for the past three years. The following table details the trend for net interest income and margin results (on a tax equivalent basis)1, yield on earning assets and rate on interest bearing liabilities. 1Non-GAAP measure - see "Explanation of Certain Unaudited Non-GAAP Financial Measures" for more information and a reconciliation to GAAP. 33 Net Interest Income1 Net Interest Margin1 Yield on Earning Assets1 $ (In thousands, except percentages) Fourth quarter 2018 First quarter 2019 Second quarter 2019 Third quarter 2019 Fourth quarter 2019 1On a fully taxable equivalent basis - see "Explanation of Certain Unaudited Non-GAAP Financial Measures" for more information and a reconciliation to GAAP. 60,100 60,861 60,219 61,027 61,846 4.67% 4.79 4.73 4.65 4.49 4.00% 4.02 3.94 3.89 3.84 0.97% 1.13 1.18 1.13 0.98 Rate on Interest Bearing Liabilities Total average loans increased $821.5 million, or 20%, during 2019 compared to 2018 and average investment securities balances decreased $130.5 million, or 10%, during 2019 compared to 2018. In 2019, average loans (the highest yielding component of earning assets) as a percentage of average earning assets totaled 79%, compared to 75% for 2018. Loan production remains strong, supported by expansion of the banking teams in Tampa and Fort Lauderdale as well as increased customer loan demand due to lower long-term interest rates. Late in 2018, Seacoast launched a large-scale initiative to implement a fully digital loan origination platform across all business banking units. Full conversion from the legacy system is now complete. The Company recognized $350,000 in annualized expense reductions as a result of this platform implementation. This investment should lead to further gains in operational efficiency and banker productivity in 2020 and beyond. As average total loans as a percentage of earning assets increased, the mix of loans has remained stable, with volumes related to commercial real estate representing 49% of total loans at December 31, 2019 compared to 49% at December 31, 2018. Residential loan balances with individuals (including home equity loans and lines, and personal construction loans) represented 32% of total loans at December 31, 2019 compared to 31% at December 31, 2018. (see “Loan Portfolio”). Loan production is detailed in the following table for the periods specified: (In thousands) Commercial/commercial real estate loan pipeline at year-end Commercial/commercial real estate loans closed Residential pipeline-saleable Residential loan sold Residential pipeline-portfolio Residential loans-retained Consumer and small business pipeline Consumer and small business originations For the Year Ended December 31, 2019 2018 $ $ $ $ 255,993 795,238 18,995 236,528 19,107 287,025 45,106 473,119 $ $ $ $ 164,064 552,878 13,555 189,235 30,100 305,953 53,453 443,406 Commercial and commercial real estate loan production in 2019 totaled $795.2 million, compared to production in 2018 of $552.9 million. During 2019, the Company acquired $72.4 million in fixed-rate commercial real estate loans from the wholesale market. Closed residential loan production totaled $523.6 million in 2019 compared to $495.2 million in 2018. 2019 includes the purchase of residential loans from the wholesale market totaling $134.7 million and $19.5 million in 2018. Consumer and small business originations reached $473.1 million during 2019 compared to $443.4 million during 2018. Loan production remains strong, supported by customer analytics and expansion of the banking teams, particularly in the Tampa, Orlando and South Florida MSAs. Average securities portfolio balances have decreased $130.5 million, or 10%, since 2018. Securities comprised 19% of average earning assets in 2019 compared to 24% for 2018. Yields on securities increased from 2.93% in 2018 to 3.00% in 2019. In 2019, the cost of average interest-bearing liabilities increased 31 basis points to 1.10% from 2018, reflecting increases in underlying market rates. The low overall cost of our funding reflects the Company’s successful core deposit focus that produced 34 strong growth in customer relationships over the past several years. Noninterest bearing demand deposits at December 31, 2019 represent 28% of total deposits, compared to 30% at December 31, 2018. The cost of average total deposits (including noninterest bearing demand deposits) in 2019 was 0.69%, compared to 0.43% in 2018. The following table provides trend detail on the ending balance components of our customer relationship funding as of: (In thousands, except percentages) Noninterest demand Interest-bearing demand Money market Savings Time certificates of deposit Total deposits Customer sweep accounts Noninterest demand deposit mix $ $ $ December 31, 2019 2018 1,590,493 1,181,732 1,108,363 519,152 1,185,013 5,584,753 86,121 $ $ $ 1,569,602 1,014,032 1,173,950 493,807 925,849 5,177,240 214,323 28% 30% The Company’s focus on convenience, with high quality customer service, expanded digital offerings and distribution channels provides stable, low cost core deposit funding. Over the past several years, the Company has strengthened its retail deposit franchise using new strategies and product offerings, while maintaining a focus on growing customer relationships. Seacoast believes that digital product offerings are central to core deposit growth as access via these distribution channels is required by customers. During 2019, average transaction deposits (noninterest and interest bearing demand) increased $285.6 million, or 12%, compared to 2018. Along with new relationships, deposit programs and digital sales have improved the Company's market share and deepened relationships with existing customers. Growth in core deposits has also provided low funding costs. The Company’s deposit mix remains favorable, with 80% of average deposit balances comprised of savings, money market, and demand deposits in 2019. The Company’s average cost of deposits, including noninterest bearing demand deposits, increased to 0.69% in 2019 compared to 0.43% in 2018 despite decreases in the Fed funds rate beginning in the third quarter of 2019. Short-term borrowings, principally comprised of sweep repurchase agreements with customers, decreased $94.7 million, or 47%, to an average of $106.1 million for the full year 2019 compared to an average of $200.8 million for the full year 2018. The decrease reflects a shift in customer balances into interest bearing deposits. The average rate on customer repurchase accounts was 1.35% in 2019 compared to 0.90% in 2018. No federal funds purchased were utilized at December 31, 2019 or 2018. FHLB borrowings totaled $315.0 million at December 31, 2019, with a weighted average rate of 1.72% at year-end compared to $380.0 million at December 31, 2018 with a weighted average rate of 2.45% at year-end. FHLB borrowings averaged $131.9 million for the full year 2019, down from $225.0 million for the full year 2018 (see “Note I – Borrowings” to the Company’s consolidated financial statements). For 2019, average subordinated debt of $70.9 million related to trust preferred securities issued by subsidiary trusts of the Company carried an average cost of 4.75%, up from 4.48% in 2018, reflecting higher market interest rates as the subordinated debt cost is based on LIBOR plus a spread (see "Note I- Borrowings"). Noninterest Income Noninterest income (excluding securities gains and losses) totaled $55.5 million in 2019, an increase of $4.9 million, or 10%, compared to 2018. Noninterest income accounted for 19% of total revenue in 2019 (net interest income plus noninterest income, excluding securities gains and losses) compared to 19% in 2018. Table 4 provides detail regarding noninterest income components for the past three years. Service charges on deposits for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to the year ended December 31, 2018 increased $0.3 million, or 3%, to $11.5 million.This increase reflects continued strength in customer acquisition and benefits from acquisition activity. Overdraft fees in each year represent 55% of total service charges on deposits. 35 Wealth management revenues, including brokerage commissions and fees and trust income, increased during 2019 by $0.4 million, or 7%, to $6.4 million. Year-over-year growth in trust revenues of $0.3 million, or 6%, to $4.4 million, and increases in the Company’s brokerage fees of $0.2 million, or 10%, to $1.9 million, were the result of continued growth in assets under management, a growing sales and support team, industry leading products including digital tools and direct referrals from the Company's team of bankers. Saleable loan originations increased by $47.3 million, or 25%, and mortgage banking fees increased by $1.8 million, or 39%, to $6.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 as compared to the prior year. These increases reflect a greater focus on generating saleable volume as well as the impact of lower long-term rates. Marine finance fees were $1.1 million in 2019, a decrease of $0.3 million, or 25%, compared to fees of $1.4 million in 2018. In 2019, marine financing income was impacted by a shift in mix towards retaining a larger portion of originations in the loan portfolio. Interchange revenue totaled $13.4 million in 2019, an increase of 9% from $12.3 million in 2018, reflecting the impact of a larger customer base, cross sell and prior bank acquisitions. Bank owned life insurance ("BOLI") income totaled $3.7 million for 2019, a decrease of $0.6 million, or 14%, compared to the prior year. The decrease reflects the impact of First Green BOLI contract surrenders completed at the end of 2018. Gains on sale of Small Business Administration ("SBA") loans totaled $2.5 million for 2019 and 2018. Other income increased $2.2 million, or 26%, year-over-year for 2019 compared to 2018. 2019 results reflect a $1.0 million BOLI death benefit and $0.9 million for swap related income. 2018 includes $0.5 million for swap related income with loan customers. Securities gains in 2019 totaled $1.2 million, resulting from the sale of $202.7 million of debt securities with an average yield of 2.37% and an increase in the value of the CRA qualified mutual fund investment of $0.2 million in 2019. Securities losses in 2018 totaled $0.6 million, resulting from the sale of $64.4 million of debt securities with an average yield of 2.42% and a decrease in the value of the CRA qualified mutual fund investment of $0.1 million. Noninterest Expense The Company has improved the efficiency ratio through continued focus on expense discipline as well as more efficient channel integration, allowing consumers and businesses to choose their path of convenience to satisfy their banking needs. This expansion launched a number of new enhancements, resulting in even greater digital access for customers, and providing improvements in productivity for the Company's customers in their daily lives. Expense reduction initiatives inclusive of a reduction in force in the second quarter of 2019 and three banking center consolidations executed in the first nine months of 2019 resulted in approximately $10 million in pretax expense reductions. Seacoast has reduced its footprint by 20% since 2017 through successful bank acquisitions and the repositioning of the banking center network in strategic growth markets to meet the evolving needs of its customers. At December 31, 2019, deposits per banking center were $116.3 million, up from $101.5 million at December 31, 2018. In 2018, the Company consolidated seven branches, including four in conjunction with the acquisition of First Green. Acquisition activity added to noninterest expenses with acquisition related costs for First Green in 2018 of approximately $9.7 million. In 2019, the Company's efficiency ratio, defined as noninterest expense less foreclosed property expense and amortization of intangibles divided by net operating revenue (net interest income on a fully tax equivalent basis plus noninterest income excluding securities gains and losses) was 51.7% compared to 60.0% for 2018. Noninterest expenses for 2019 totaled $160.7 million, a decrease of $1.5 million, or 1%, compared to 2018. Adjusted noninterest expense1 was $152.0 million for 2019, compared to $147.7 million for 2018. The Company expects its efficiency ratios to increase slightly above 50% in the first half of 2020, then decrease below 50% when exiting 2020. 36 (In thousands) Noninterest expense, as reported Merger related charges Amortization of intangibles Business continuity expenses - hurricane events Branch reductions and other expense initiatives Total adjustments Adjusted noninterest expense1 For the Year Ended December 31, 2019 2018 $ 160,739 $ 162,273 (969) (5,826) (95) (1,846) (8,736) 152,003 $ (9,681) (4,300) — (587) (14,568) 147,705 $ Efficiency ratio Adjusted efficiency ratio1,2 1Non-GAAP measure - see "Explanation of Certain Unaudited Non-GAAP Financial Measures" for more information and a reconciliation to GAAP. 2Adjusted efficiency ratio is defined as noninterest expense, including adjustments to noninterest expense divided by aggregated tax equivalent net interest income and noninterest income, including adjustments to revenue. 51.71% 59.98% 50.90 56.13 Table 5 provides detail of noninterest expense components for the years ending December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017. Salaries and wages totaling $73.8 million were $2.7 million, or 4%, higher for the full year 2019 compared to the full year 2018. Higher base salaries, attributed to merit increases, were the primary cause of the increase in salaries and wages, increasing $6.5 million, or 11%, compared to 2018. Continued focus on expense control as well as restructured compensation plans resulted in incentives that were $2.9 million, or 13%, lower year-over-year. Severance costs also increased by $0.5 million, or 67%, year- over-year, of which $1.1 million related to a reduction in workforce during the second quarter of 2019. In 2019, deferred loan origination costs, a contra expense, decreased by $0.7 million compared to 2018. During 2019, employee benefit costs which include, group health insurance, defined contribution plan, payroll taxes, and unemployment compensation, increased $0.8 million, or 6%, compared to 2018, the result of an increase in payroll taxes of $0.6 million and an increase in defined contribution plan expenditures of $0.2 million, partially offset by a decrease in group health insurance of $0.1 million. Increases in payroll taxes and defined contribution plan expenditures are correlated to the increase in salaries and wages. The Company has continued to actively manage group health insurance expenses to maintain a low cost structure while continuing to provide quality coverage to employees. The Company utilizes third parties for core data processing systems. The data processing costs associated with these third parties fluctuate based on the number of transactions processed and the negotiated rates associated with those transactions. Outsourced data processing costs totaled $15.1 million and $16.4 million in 2019 and 2018, respectively. The $1.3 million, or 8%, decrease in 2019 reflects the impact of lower negotiated rates with some of the Company's key third party providers. The Company continues to improve and enhance mobile and other digital products and services through key third parties. This may increase outsourced data processing costs as customers adopt improvements and products and as business volumes grow. 2018 expenditures also include one-time charges for conversion activity related to our acquisition of First Green. Telephone and data line expenses, including electronic communications with customers, between branch locations and personnel, and with third party data processors, increased $0.5 million, or 19%, to $3.0 million during 2019 compared to 2018. The increase reflects the continued shift towards serving the customer through the Customer Support Center and digital channels. Total occupancy, furniture and equipment expenses in 2019 totaled $20.5 million, an increase of $0.4 million, or 2%, compared to 2018. The increase is primarily related to higher leasing expenses of $0.8 million and higher technology hardware maintenance expenses of $0.3 million, partially offset by lower asset write-offs of $0.7 million. The increase in lease expenses reflects the full year impact of branches acquired from First Green in the third quarter of 2018, while the decrease in asset write-offs reflects lower branch closure activity compared to the prior year. The Company continues to strategically manage its branch footprint to balance customer needs for access to physical branches complemented by the ability to provide services through phone based and digital channels. Branch consolidations will continue for the Company and the banking industry in general as the customer service dynamic continues to evolve. In 2019 and 2018, marketing expenses (including sales promotion costs, ad agency production and printing costs, digital, newspaper, advertising, and other public relations costs) totaled $4.2 million and $5.1 million, respectively. The Company continues to carefully 37 manage the use of marketing campaigns to target potential high value customers in a cost effective manner through a mix of digital communications, direct mail, event sponsorships and donations. Legal and professional fees for 2019 and 2018 totaled $8.6 million and $10.0 million, respectively. 2019 expenses include significant projects in the first quarter of 2019 in risk management and lending operations while 2018 reflects acquisition related expenditures of $2.1 million. FDIC assessments were $0.9 million in 2019 compared to $2.2 million in 2018. During the third quarter of 2019, the FDIC announced the achievement of the target deposit insurance reserve ratio, resulting in the Company's ability to apply previously awarded credits to its deposit insurance assessment. The Company utilized $0.9 million in credits to offset FDIC assessments during the third and fourth quarter of 2019. The Company has remaining credits of $0.7 million, which will be applied to future assessments if the FDIC’s reserve ratio remains above the target threshold. For the year ended December 31, 2019, foreclosed property expense and net loss on sale was $0.1 million compared to $0.5 million in 2018. Higher expenses in 2018 are the result of losses on the sale of OREO properties. Other expense totaled $15.2 million and $17.2 million in 2019 and 2018, respectively. The decrease of $2.0 million, or 12%, for the year ended December 31, 2019 reflects a continued focus on efficiency and streamlining operations. Income Taxes For 2019 and 2018, provision for income taxes totaled $29.9 million, and $20.3 million, respectively. The Company's overall effective tax rate increased to 23.2% in 2019 from 23.1% in 2018. In September 2019, the State of Florida announced a reduction in the corporate income tax rate from 5.5% to 4.458% for the years 2019, 2020 and 2021. This change resulted in additional income tax expense of $1.1 million upon the write down in the third quarter of 2019 of deferred tax assets affected by the change, offset by a $0.4 million benefit upon adjusting the year-to-date provision to the new statutory tax rate. Taxes for 2018 also included taxes and penalties of $0.5 million on the redemption of First Green BOLI policies in the fourth quarter of 2018. Discrete tax benefits related to share-based compensation were $0.8 million and $1.1 million in 2019 and 2018, respectively. Fourth Quarter Review Net income totaled $27.2 million, an increase of $1.6 million, or 6%, from the third quarter of 2019, and an increase of $11.2 million, or 70%, compared with the fourth quarter of 2018. Adjusted net income totaled $26.8 million, a decrease of $0.9 million, or 3%, from the third quarter of 2019, and an increase of $2.9 million, or 12%, compared with the fourth quarter of 2018. Diluted earnings per common share (“EPS”) were $0.52 and adjusted diluted EPS were $0.52 in the fourth quarter of 2019, compared to diluted EPS of $0.49 and adjusted diluted EPS of $0.53 in the third quarter of 2019 and to diluted EPS of $0.31 and adjusted diluted EPS of $0.47 in the fourth quarter of 2018. Adjusted net income and adjusted diluted EPS are non-GAAP measures, see "Explanation of Certain Unaudited Non-GAAP Financial Measures" for more information and a reconciliation to GAAP. Revenues increased $3.2 million, or 4%, from the third quarter of 2019 and increased $5.4 million, or 7%, from the fourth quarter of 2018 levels. Net interest income improved $0.8 million, or 1%, compared to third quarter of 2019 and improved $1.8 million, or 3%, compared to the fourth quarter of 2018. Improvements are due to organic growth and impact of the acquisition completed during the fourth quarter 2018. Net interest income (on a tax-equivalent basis, a non-GAAP measure) for the fourth quarter 2019 totaled $61.8 million, an increase of $0.8 million, or 1%, from the third quarter of 2019, and an increase of $1.7 million, or 3%, from the fourth quarter 2018. Net interest margin (on a tax-equivalent basis, a non-GAAP measure) decreased 5 basis points to 3.84% from the third quarter of 2019 and decreased 16 basis points from the fourth quarter 2018. The Federal Reserve reduced the overnight rate three times by 25 basis points during the third and fourth quarters of 2019 and the 10-year treasury rate fell by approximately 25 basis points, resulting in lower new earning asset yields and further declines in variable rate earning asset portfolios. This was partially offset by the Company's success in lowering the cost of funding, the result of focus on maintaining deposit pricing discipline. Noninterest income, excluding securities gains and losses, totaled $13.8 million for the fourth quarter of 2019, a decrease of $1.0 million, or 6%, from the third quarter of 2019 and an increase of $0.7 million, or 5%, from the fourth quarter of 2018. Mortgage banking fees and interchange income increased the most year-over-year, increasing $0.7 million and $0.2 million, respectively. Service charges on deposits and interchange income reflect continued growth and benefits from organic growth as well as acquisition activity, including the First Green acquisition in the fourth quarter of 2018. Other income benefited from an increased BOLI payout, increased swap related income, increased SBIC investment income, and higher other miscellaneous related fees. 38 Noninterest expenses for the fourth quarter 2019 totaled $38.1 million, a decrease of $0.5 million, or 1% from the prior quarter and a decrease of $11.4 million, or 23%, from the fourth quarter of 2018. Of the $11.4 million decrease year-over-year, salaries, wages decreased $4.9 million, employee benefits decreased $0.3 million, outsourced data processing decreased $2.2 million, and occupancy and furniture and equipment costs (aggregated) were lower by $1.4 million. Expenditure reductions were the result of our continued focus on efficiency and streamlining operations. A provision for loan losses of $4.8 million was recorded in fourth quarter of 2019 compared to $2.3 million in the previous quarter and a year ago. The allowance for loan losses to portfolio loans outstanding ratio at December 31, 2019 was 0.68%, compared to 0.67% a year earlier, and the coverage ratio (the allowance for loan losses to nonaccrual loans) was 130% at December 31, 2019 compared to 123% at December 31, 2018, reflecting improvement in credit quality. Update on Vision 2020 The Company's Vision 2020 objectives were introduced at its investor day in early 2017. These targets are reiterated below. Management remains confident in the Company's ability to achieve these objectives. The Company expects its adjusted efficiency ratio1 to move modestly above 50% in the first half of 2020 due to the seasonality of certain expenditures, before moving back to below 50% exiting 2020. Return on Tangible Assets Return on Tangible Common Equity Efficiency Ratio 1See "Explanation of Certain Unaudited Non-GAAP Financial Measures" for more information and a reconciliation to GAAP. Vision 2020 Targets 1.30%+ 16%+ Below 50% Full Year 20191 1.58% 14.93% 50.90% Explanation of Certain Unaudited Non-GAAP Financial Measures This report contains financial information determined by methods other than Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”). The financial highlights provide reconciliations between GAAP and adjusted financial measures including net income, fully taxable equivalent net interest income, noninterest income, noninterest expense, tax adjustments, net interest margin and other financial ratios. Management uses these non-GAAP financial measures in its analysis of the Company’s performance and believes these presentations provide useful supplemental information, and a clearer understanding of the Company’s performance. The Company believes the non-GAAP measures enhance investors’ understanding of the Company’s business and performance and if not provided would be requested by the investor community. These measures are also useful in understanding performance trends and facilitate comparisons with the performance of other financial institutions. The limitations associated with operating measures are the risk that persons might disagree as to the appropriateness of items comprising these measures and that different companies might define or calculate these measures differently. The Company provides reconciliations between GAAP and these non-GAAP measures. These disclosures should not be considered an alternative to GAAP. The following tables provide reconciliation between GAAP and adjusted financial measures. (In thousands except per share data) Net income, as reported: Net income Diluted earnings per share Adjusted net income: Net income Securities losses, net BOLI benefits on death (included in other income) Total adjustments to revenue Merger related charges Amortization of intangibles Quarters Fourth 2019 Third 2019 Second 2019 First 2019 Total Year $ $ 27,176 0.52 $ $ 25,605 0.49 $ $ 23,253 0.45 $ $ 22,705 0.44 $ $ 98,739 1.90 $ 27,176 $ 25,605 $ 23,253 $ 22,705 $ 98,739 (2,539) — (2,539) (634) (1,456) 847 (956) (109) — 466 — 466 — (1,456) (1,456) 9 — 9 (335) (1,458) (1,217) (956) (2,173) (969) (5,826) 39 (In thousands except per share data) Business continuity expenses - hurricane events Branch reductions and other expense initiatives1 Total adjustments to noninterest expense Tax effect of adjustments Effect of change in corporate tax rate on deferred tax assets Adjusted net income Adjusted diluted earnings per share Quarters Fourth 2019 Third 2019 Second 2019 — — (95) (121) (2,090) (1,672) (110) — 26,837 0.52 $ $ 572 (1,135) 27,731 0.53 $ $ $ $ — (1,517) (2,973) 874 — 25,818 0.50 First 2019 — (208) (2,001) 510 — Total Year (95) (1,846) (8,736) 1,846 (1,135) $ $ 24,205 $ 104,591 0.47 $ 2.01 Average Assets $ 6,996,214 $ 6,820,576 $ 6,734,994 $ 6,770,978 $ 6,831,280 Less average goodwill and intangible assets (226,060) (227,389) (228,706) (230,066) (228,042) Average Tangible Assets $ 6,770,154 $ 6,593,187 $ 6,506,288 $ 6,540,912 $ 6,603,238 Return on Average Assets (ROA) 1.54% 1.49% 1.38% 1.36% 1.45% Impact of removing average intangible assets and related amortization Return on Average Tangible Assets (ROTA) Impact of other adjustments for Adjusted Net Income Adjusted Return on Average Tangible Assets 0.12 1.66 (0.09) 1.57 0.12 1.61 0.06 1.67 0.12 1.50 0.09 1.59 0.12 1.48 0.02 1.50 0.11 1.56 0.02 1.58 Average Shareholders' Equity $ 976,200 $ 946,670 $ 911,479 $ 879,564 $ 928,793 Less average goodwill and intangible assets (226,060) (227,389) (228,706) (230,066) (228,042) Average Tangible Equity $ 750,140 $ 719,281 $ 682,773 $ 649,498 $ 700,751 Return on Average Shareholders' Equity 11.04% 10.73% 10.23% 10.47% 10.63% Impact of removing average intangible assets and related amortization Return on Average Tangible Common Equity (ROTCE) Impact of other adjustments for Adjusted Net Income Adjusted Return on Average Tangible Common Equity 3.91 14.95 (0.76) 14.19 4.00 14.73 0.57 15.30 4.07 14.30 0.87 15.17 4.39 14.86 0.25 15.11 4.09 14.72 0.21 14.93 Loan interest income excluding accretion on acquired loans2 Accretion on acquired loans Loan Interest Income2 $ $ 59,515 3,407 62,922 $ $ 59,279 3,859 63,138 $ $ 58,169 4,166 62,335 $ $ 58,397 $ 235,359 3,938 15,371 62,335 $ 250,730 40 (In thousands except per share data) Yield on loans excluding accretion on acquired loans2 Impact of accretion on acquired loans Yield on Loans2 Net interest income excluding accretion on acquired loans2 Accretion on acquired loans Net Interest Income2 Net interest margin excluding accretion on acquired loans2 Impact of accretion on acquired loans Net Interest Margin2 Loan interest income excluding tax equivalent adjustment Tax equivalent adjustment to loans Loan Interest Income2 Security interest income excluding tax equivalent adjustment Tax equivalent adjustment to securities Securities Interest Income2 Net interest income excluding tax equivalent adjustments Tax equivalent adjustment to loans Tax equivalent adjustment to securities Net Interest Income2 Quarters Fourth 2019 Third 2019 Second 2019 First 2019 Total Year 4.63% 0.26 4.89 58,439 3,407 61,846 3.63% 0.21 3.84 62,867 55 62,922 8,630 32 8,662 61,759 55 32 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 4.76% 0.30 5.06 57,168 3,859 61,027 3.64% 0.25 3.89 63,091 47 63,138 8,933 33 8,966 60,947 47 33 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 4.82% 0.34 5.16 56,053 4,166 60,219 3.67% 0.27 3.94 62,287 48 62,335 9,076 36 9,112 60,135 48 36 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 4.89% 0.33 5.22 4.77% 0.31 5.08 56,923 $ 228,582 3,938 15,371 60,861 $ 243,953 3.76% 0.26 4.02 3.67% 0.25 3.92 62,287 $ 250,532 48 198 62,335 $ 250,730 9,270 39 9,309 $ $ 35,909 140 36,049 60,774 $ 243,615 48 39 198 140 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 61,846 $ 61,027 $ 60,219 $ 60,861 $ 243,953 1Includes severance, contract termination costs, disposition of branch premises and fixed assets, and other costs to effect our branch consolidation and other expense reduction strategies. 2On a fully taxable equivalent basis. All yields and rates have been computed using amortized cost. 41 (In thousands except per share data) Net income, as reported: Net income Diluted earnings per share Adjusted net income: Net income Securities losses, net BOLI benefits on death (included in other income) Total adjustments to revenue Merger related charges Amortization of intangibles Branch reductions and other expense initiatives1 Total adjustments to noninterest expense Tax effect of adjustments Effect of change in corporate tax rate on deferred tax assets Adjusted net income Adjusted diluted earnings per share Quarters Fourth 2018 Third 2018 Second 2018 First 2018 Total Year $ $ 15,962 0.31 $ $ 16,322 0.34 $ $ 16,964 0.35 $ $ 18,027 0.38 $ $ 67,275 1.38 15,962 16,322 16,964 18,027 67,275 425 (280) 145 (8,034) (1,303) (587) (9,924) 2,138 — 23,893 0.47 $ $ 48 — 48 (482) (1,004) — 48 — 48 (695) (1,004) — 102 — 102 (470) (989) — 623 (280) 343 (9,681) (4,300) (587) (1,486) (1,699) (1,459) (14,568) 230 — 17,626 0.37 $ $ 443 — 18,268 0.38 $ $ 290 (248) 19,298 0.40 $ $ 3,101 (248) 79,085 1.62 $ $ Average Assets $ 6,589,870 $ 5,903,327 $ 5,878,035 $ 5,851,688 $ 6,057,335 Less average goodwill and intangible assets (213,713) (165,534) (166,393) (167,136) (178,287) Average Tangible Assets $ 6,376,157 $ 5,737,793 $ 5,711,642 $ 5,684,552 $ 5,879,048 Return on Average Assets (ROA) Impact of removing average intangible assets and related amortization Return on Average Tangible Assets (ROTA) Impact of other adjustments for Adjusted Net Income Adjusted Return on Average Tangible Assets 0.96% 1.10% 1.16% 1.25% 1.11% 0.09 1.05 0.44 1.49 0.08 1.18 0.04 1.22 0.08 1.24 0.04 1.28 0.09 1.34 0.04 1.38 0.09 1.20 0.15 1.35 Average Shareholders' Equity 827,759 728,290 709,674 695,240 740,571 Less average goodwill and intangible assets (213,713) (165,534) (166,393) (167,136) (178,287) Average Tangible Equity 614,046 562,756 543,281 528,104 562,284 Return on Average Shareholders' Equity Impact of removing average intangible assets and related amortization Return on Average Tangible Common Equity (ROTCE) Impact of other adjustments for Adjusted Net Income Adjusted Return on Average Tangible Common Equity Loan interest income excluding accretion on acquired loans2 Accretion on acquired loans Loan Interest Income2 7.65% 8.89% 9.59% 10.52% 9.08% 3.29 10.94 4.50 15.44 3.15 12.04 0.39 12.43 3.49 13.08 0.41 13.49 3.89 14.41 0.41 14.82 3.46 12.54 1.52 14.06 $ $ 55,470 4,089 59,559 $ $ 46,349 2,453 48,802 $ $ 44,341 2,208 46,549 $ $ 42,705 $ 188,865 2,579 11,329 45,284 $ 200,194 Yield on loans excluding accretion on acquired loans2 Impact of accretion on acquired loans Yield on Loans2 4.77% 0.35 5.12 4.59% 0.24 4.83 4.50% 0.23 4.73 4.47% 0.27 4.74 4.59% 0.28 4.87 42 (In thousands except per share data) Net interest income excluding accretion on acquired loans2 Accretion on acquired loans Net Interest Income2 Net interest margin excluding accretion on acquired loans2 Impact of accretion on acquired loans Net Interest Margin2 Loan interest income excluding tax equivalent adjustment Tax equivalent adjustment to loans Loan Interest Income2 Security interest income excluding tax equivalent adjustment Tax equivalent adjustment to securities Securities Interest Income2 Net interest income excluding tax equivalent adjustments Tax equivalent adjustment to loans Tax equivalent adjustment to securities Net Interest Income2 Quarters Fourth 2018 56,011 4,089 60,100 Third 2018 $ $ 49,256 2,453 51,709 Second 2018 $ $ 48,086 2,208 50,294 First 2018 Total Year $ $ 47,274 $ 200,627 2,579 11,329 49,853 $ 211,956 3.73% 3.64% 3.60% 3.60% 3.65% 0.27 4.00 59,495 64 59,559 9,728 52 9,780 59,984 64 52 0.18 3.82 48,713 89 48,802 9,807 58 9,865 51,562 89 58 $ $ $ $ $ 0.17 3.77 46,519 30 46,549 9,604 58 9,662 50,206 30 58 $ $ $ $ $ 0.20 3.80 0.20 3.85 45,257 $ 199,984 27 210 45,284 $ 200,194 9,604 64 9,668 $ $ 38,743 232 38,975 49,762 $ 211,514 27 64 210 232 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 60,100 $ 51,709 $ 50,294 $ 49,853 $ 211,956 1Includes severance, contract termination costs, disposition of branch premises and fixed assets, and other costs to effect our branch consolidation and other expense reduction strategies. 2On a fully taxable equivalent basis. All yields and rates have been computed using amortized cost. 43 Financial Condition Total assets increased $0.4 billion or 5% year-over-year to $7.1 billion at December 31, 2019, and $0.9 billion or 16% year-over- year to $6.7 billion in 2018. Growth benefited from new relationships derived through the Company's unique combination of customer analytics, marketing automation and experienced bankers in growing markets. Securities Information related to yields, maturities, carrying values and fair value of the Company’s securities is set forth in Tables 13-16 and “Note D – Securities” of the Company’s consolidated financial statements. At December 31, 2019, the Company had $946.9 million in securities available-for-sale, and $261.4 million in securities held-to- maturity. The Company's total debt securities portfolio decreased $15.6 million or 1% from December 31, 2018. In January 2019, the Company adopted ASU 2017-12 and elected to transfer securities with an aggregate amortized cost basis of $53.5 million and fair value of $52.8 million from held-to maturity designation to available-for sale. During the year ended December 31, 2019, there were $309.5 million of debt security purchases and $144.2 million in paydowns and maturities over the same period. For the year ended December 31, 2019, proceeds from the sale of securities totaled $202.7 million, with net gains of $1.0 million. A downward shift in the yield curve contributed to an increase of $17.5 million in market value of the available-for-sale securities since December 31, 2018. During the year ended December 31, 2018, there were $104.7 million of debt security purchases and $199.6 million in paydowns and maturities over the same period. For the year ended December 31, 2018, proceeds from the sale of securities totaled $64.4 million, with net losses of $0.5 million. Debt securities generally return principal and interest monthly. The modified duration of the investment portfolio at December 31, 2019 was 3.5 years compared to 4.8 years at December 31, 2018. At December 31, 2019, available-for-sale securities had gross unrealized losses of $2.7 million and gross unrealized gains of $8.8 million, compared to gross unrealized losses of $18.3 million and gross unrealized gains of $1.3 million at December 31, 2018. All of the securities with unrealized losses are reviewed for other than temporary impairment at least quarterly. As a result of these reviews it was determined that the securities were not other than temporarily impaired (see additional discussion under “Other Fair Value Measurements” and “Other than Temporary Impairment of Securities” in “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates”). The credit quality of the Company’s securities holdings are primarily investment grade. As of December 31, 2019, the Company’s investment securities, except for $31.8 million of securities issued by states and their political subdivisions, generally are traded in liquid markets. U.S. Treasury and U.S. government agencies and obligations of U.S. government sponsored entities totaled $880.7 million, or 73%, of the total portfolio. The portfolio also includes $57.6 million in private label securities, most secured by residential real estate collateral originated in 2005 or prior years with low loan to values, and current FICO scores above 700. Generally these securities have credit support exceeding 5%. The collateral underlying these mortgage investments are primarily 30- and 15-year fixed rate, 5/1 and 10/1 adjustable rate mortgage loans. Historically, the mortgage loans serving as collateral for those investments have had minimal foreclosures and losses. The Company also has invested $238.2 million in uncapped 3-month LIBOR floating rate collateralized loan obligations. Collateralized loan obligations are special purpose vehicles that purchase first lien broadly syndicated corporate loans while providing support to senior tranche investors. As of December 31, 2019, the Company held 83% in AAA/AA tranches and 17% in A-rated tranches with average credit support of 31% and 19%, respectively. The Company performs routine stress testing on these securities to assess both structure and collateral. On January 1, 2018, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2016-1, "Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities." Upon adoption, the Company reclassified $0.1 million of accumulated unrealized loss pertaining to an equity investment previously classified as available-for-sale from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings. Loans Loans, net of unearned income and excluding the allowance for loan losses, were $5.2 billion at December 31, 2019, $0.4 billion, or 8%, more than at December 31, 2018. Success in commercial lending through continued investment in business bankers has increased loan growth. For the year ended December 31, 2019, $795.2 million in commercial and commercial real estate loans were originated as compared to $552.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, an increase $242.4 million, or 44%. Loan pipeline for commercial and commercial real estate loans totaled $256.0 million at December 31, 2019. Analytics and digital marketing have further fueled loan growth in the consumer and small business channels. Consumer and small business originations 44 totaled $473.1 million for the year ended 2019, an increase of $29.7 million, or 7%, compared to the year ended 2018, and the pipeline for these loans at December 31, 2019 was $45.1 million. The Company closed $523.6 million of residential loans during 2019 compared to $495.2 million closed during 2018. Sold volumes were higher in 2019, representing 45% of production versus 38% of production during the year ended December 31, 2018. The saleable residential mortgage pipeline at December 31, 2019 totaled $19.0 million while the retained pipeline was $19.1 million. Growth in loans reflects the Company's success in attracting top-tier business bankers, as well as investments in commercial and mortgage banking origination platforms. In 2020, the Company will continue to opportunistically add talent in key growing markets. The Company opportunistically purchases loans in the wholesale market to supplement its organic loan production. During the second quarter of 2019, the Company purchased $29.7 million in fixed-rate residential loans and $20.3 million in fixed-rate commercial real estate loans. The residential loans averaged $0.7 million in size with an average yield of 4.14% while the commercial real estate loans averaged $1.6 million in size with an average yield of 4.09%. During the third quarter of 2019, the Company purchased $52.1 million in fixed-rate commercial real estate loans, which averaged $1.6 million in size with an average yield of 3.75%. During the fourth quarter of 2019, the Company purchased $99.0 million in residential loans, which averaged $0.2 million in size with an average yield of 3.82%. In 2018, the successful acquisition of First Green further supplemented loan growth, contributing $631.5 million to total loans. Continued growth is accompanied by defined risk management procedures. Lending policies contain guardrails that pertain to lending by type of collateral and purpose, along with limits regarding loan concentrations and the principal amount of loans. The Company's exposure to commercial real estate lending remains below regulatory limits (see “Loan Concentrations”). Table 7 shows total loans (net of unearned income) for commercial and residential real estate, commercial and financial and consumer loans outstanding for the last five years. The following table details loan portfolio composition at December 31, 2019 and 2018 for portfolio loans, purchased credit impaired loans (“PCI”), and purchased unimpaired loans (“PUL”) as defined in Note E-Loans. (In thousands) Construction and land development Commercial real estate1 Residential real estate Commercial and financial Consumer Net Loan Balances2 (In thousands) Construction and land development Commercial real estate1 Residential real estate Commercial and financial Consumer Net Loan Balances2 Portfolio Loans 281,335 $ 1,834,811 1,304,305 697,301 200,166 4,317,918 $ Portfolio Loans 301,473 $ 1,437,989 1,055,525 603,057 190,207 3,588,251 $ $ $ $ $ December 31, 2019 PCI Loans PULs Total 160 10,217 1,710 579 — 12,666 $ $ 43,618 533,943 201,848 80,372 8,039 867,820 December 31, 2018 PCI Loans PULs 151 10,828 2,718 737 — 14,434 $ $ 141,944 683,249 266,134 118,528 12,674 1,222,529 $ $ $ $ 325,113 2,378,971 1,507,863 778,252 208,205 5,198,404 Total 443,568 2,132,066 1,324,377 722,322 202,881 4,825,214 1Commercial real estate includes owner-occupied balances of $1.0 billion and $970.2 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. 2Net loan balances at December 31, 2019 and 2018 include deferred costs of $19.9 million and $16.9 million, respectively. Commercial real estate loans, inclusive of owner-occupied commercial real estate, were higher by $246.9 million or 12% totaling $2.4 billion at December 31, 2019, compared to December 31, 2018. Owner-occupied loans represent $1.0 billion or 44% of the commercial real estate portfolio. Office building loans of $673.1 million, or 28%, of commercial real estate mortgages, comprise our largest concentration with a substantial portion owner-occupied. 45 The Company’s ten largest commercial and commercial real estate funded and unfunded loan relationships at December 31, 2019 aggregated to $268.9 million, of which $179.0 million was funded, compared to $218.6 million a year ago, of which $162.5 million was funded. The Company’s 120 commercial and commercial real estate relationships in excess of $5 million totaled $1.2 billion, of which $1.0 billion was funded, compared to 128 relationships of $1.3 billion at December 31, 2018, of which $1.0 billion was funded. Fixed-rate and adjustable-rate loans secured by commercial real estate, excluding construction loans, totaled approximately $2.0 billion and $418.8 million, respectively, at December 31, 2019, compared to $1.6 billion and $533.4 million, respectively, at December 31, 2018. Commercial and financial loans outstanding increased $55.9 million, or 8%, year-over year to $778.3 million as of December 31, 2019. The Company's primary customers for commercial and financial loans are small- to medium-sized professional firms, retail and wholesale outlets, and light industrial and manufacturing companies. Such businesses are smaller and subject to the risks of lending to small- to medium-sized businesses, including, but not limited to, the effects of a downturn in the local economy, possible business failure, and insufficient cash flows. Residential mortgage loans increased $183.5 million or 14% year-over-year to $1.5 billion as of December 31, 2019. Substantially all residential originations have been underwritten to conventional loan agency standards, including loans having balances that exceed agency value limitations. At December 31, 2019, approximately $556.5 million, or 37%, of the Company’s residential mortgage balances were adjustable 1-4 family mortgage loans (including hybrid adjustable rate mortgages). Fixed rate mortgages totaled $590.0 million, or 39%, of the residential mortgage portfolio at December 31, 2019, of which 15- and 30-year mortgages totaled $43.5 million and $372.0 million, respectively. Remaining fixed rate balances were comprised of home improvement loans totaling $243.8 million, most with maturities of 10 years or less. Home equity lines of credit, primarily floating rates, totaled $292.1 million at December 31, 2019. In comparison, loans secured by residential properties having fixed-rates totaled $370.2 million at December 31, 2018, with 15- and 30-year fixed-rate residential mortgages totaling $32.1 million and $276.5 million, respectively, and home equity mortgages and lines of credit totaled $135.8 million and $261.9 million, respectively. The Company also provides consumer loans, which includes installment loans, auto loans, marine loans and other consumer loans, which increased $5.3 million, or 3%, year-over-year to total $208.2 million at December 31, 2019 compared to $202.9 million at December 31, 2018. Of the $5.3 million increase, automobile loans and marine loans increased $2.5 million and $7.4 million, respectively, while other consumer loans decreased $4.6 million. In comparison, consumer loans increased $13.0 million, or 7%, year-over-year for 2018 compared to year-end 2017, with increases of $1.5 million, $4.8 million and $6.8 million automobile loans, other consumer loans and marine loans, respectively. At December 31, 2019, the Company had unfunded commitments to make loans of $1.0 billion, compared to $982.7 million at December 31, 2018 (see “Note P - Contingent Liabilities and Commitments with Off-Balance Sheet Risk” to the Company’s consolidated financial statements). Loan Concentrations The Company has developed guardrails to manage loan types that are most impacted by stressed market conditions in order to achieve lower levels of credit loss volatility in the future. Outstanding balances for commercial and commercial real estate ("CRE") loan relationships greater than $10 million totaled $680.2 million, representing 13% of the total portfolio at December 31, 2019 compared to $502.1 million, or 10%, at December 31, 2018. Concentrations in total construction and land development loans and total CRE loans are maintained well below regulatory limits. Construction and land development and CRE loan concentrations as a percentage of total risk based capital, were stable at 40% and 204%, respectively, at December 31, 2019, compared to 63% and 227% as of December 31, 2018. Regulatory guidance suggests limits of 100% and 300%, respectively. On a consolidated basis, construction and land development and commercial real estate loans represent 38% and 191%, respectively, of total consolidated risk based capital. To determine these ratios, the Company defines CRE in accordance with the guidance on “Concentrations in Commercial Real Estate Lending” issued by the federal bank regulatory agencies in 2006 (and reinforced in 2015), which defines CRE loans as exposures secured by land development and construction, including 1-4 family residential construction, multifamily property, and non-farm nonresidential property where the primary or a significant source of repayment is derived from rental income associated with the property (i.e. loans for which 50 percent or more of the source of repayment comes from third party, non-affiliated, rental income) or the proceeds of the sale, refinancing, or permanent financing of the property. Loans on owner occupied CRE are generally excluded. Nonperforming Loans, Troubled Debt Restructurings, Other Real Estate Owned, and Credit Quality Table 12 provides certain information concerning nonperforming assets for the years indicated. 46 Nonperforming assets (“NPAs”) at December 31, 2019 totaled $39.3 million, flat compared to 2018, and were comprised of $21.0 million of nonaccrual portfolio loans, $6.0 million of nonaccrual purchased loans, $5.2 million of non-acquired other real estate owned (“OREO”), $0.4 million of acquired OREO and $6.8 million of branches taken out of service. Compared to December 31, 2018, nonaccrual purchased loans decreased $4.7 million and acquired OREO declined $2.6 million, primarily the result of sales of OREO properties. The increase in non-acquired OREO of $4.8 million from December 31, 2018 included additions of $5.7 million offset by sales of $0.9 million. The decrease in OREO for bank branches of $2.6 million consists primarily of property sales. Approximately 78% of nonaccrual loans were secured with real estate at December 31, 2019. Nonaccrual loans have been written down by approximately $5.6 million, or 17%, of the original loan balance (including specific impairment reserves). See the tables below for details about nonaccrual loans. Nonperforming loans to total loans outstanding at December 31, 2019 decreased to 0.52% from 0.55% at December 31, 2018. Nonperforming assets to total assets at December 31, 2019 also decreased to 0.55% from 0.58% at December 31, 2018. The Company’s asset mitigation staff handles all foreclosure actions together with outside legal counsel. The Company pursues loan restructurings in selected cases where it expects to realize better values than may be expected through traditional collection activities. The Company has worked with retail mortgage customers, when possible, to achieve lower payment structures in an effort to avoid foreclosure. Troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”) have been a part of the Company’s loss mitigation activities and can include rate reductions, payment extensions and principal deferrals. Company policy requires TDRs that are classified as nonaccrual loans after restructuring remain on nonaccrual until performance can be verified, which usually requires six months of performance under the restructured loan terms. Accruing restructured loans totaled $11.1 million at December 31, 2019 compared to $13.3 million at December 31, 2018. Accruing TDRs are excluded from our nonperforming asset ratios. The tables below set forth details related to nonaccrual and accruing restructured loans. (In thousands) Construction & land development Residential Commercial Individuals Residential real estate mortgages Commercial real estate mortgages Real estate loans Commercial and financial Consumer Total loans December 31, 2019 Nonaccrual Loans Non-Current Current Total Accruing Restructured Loans $ — $ — $ — $ 4,902 — 4,902 2,552 3,802 11,256 4,674 38 — 35 35 6,927 2,718 9,680 1,235 72 4,902 35 4,937 9,479 6,520 20,936 5,909 110 — — 131 131 6,027 4,666 10,824 26 250 $ 15,968 $ 10,987 $ 26,955 $ 11,100 47 (In thousands) Construction & land development Residential Commercial Individuals Residential real estate mortgages Commercial real estate mortgages Real estate loans Commercial and financial Consumer Total loans December 31, 2018 Nonaccrual Loans Non-Current Current Total Accruing Restructured Loans $ — $ — $ — $ — 16 16 5,567 7,720 13,303 2,488 108 — 28 28 8,141 1,500 9,669 833 75 — 44 44 13,708 9,220 22,972 3,321 183 — 14 170 184 7,176 5,662 13,022 — 324 $ 15,899 $ 10,577 $ 26,476 $ 13,346 At December 31, 2019 and 2018, total TDRs (performing and nonperforming) were comprised of the following loans by type of modification: (Dollars in thousands) Rate reduction Maturity extended with change in terms Chapter 7 bankruptcies Not elsewhere classified Total loans December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018 Number Amount Number Amount 52 41 18 9 $ 12,048 3,755 1,920 646 56 48 22 11 $ 10,739 5,083 1,275 966 120 $ 18,369 137 $ 18,063 During the year ended December 31, 2019, nine loans totaling $4.7 million were modified to a TDR, compared to four loans totaling $0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. Loan modifications are not reported in calendar years after modification if the loans were modified at an interest rate equal to the yields of new loan originations with comparable risk and the loans are performing based on the terms of the restructuring agreements. There were four defaults totaling $3.2 million within the twelve months preceding December 31, 2019 and no defaults within the twelve months preceding December 31, 2018. A restructured loan is considered in default when it becomes 90 days or more past due under the modified terms, has been transferred to nonaccrual status, or has been transferred to OREO. At December 31, 2019, loans, excluding PCI loans, totaling $36.1 million were considered impaired and $2.9 million of the allowance for loan losses was allocated for probable losses on these loans, compared to $36.7 million and $2.7 million, respectively, at December 31, 2018. The Company reviews all loans for impairment on a periodic basis. A loan is considered to be impaired when, based on current information, it is probable the Company will not receive all amounts due in accordance with the contractual terms of a loan agreement. Once impaired, the current fair market value of the collateral is assessed and a specific reserve and/or charge-off is taken, if necessary. In accordance with regulatory reporting requirements, loans are placed on nonaccrual following the Retail Classification of Loan interagency guidance. The accrual of interest is generally discontinued on loans, except consumer loans, that become 90 days past due as to principal or interest unless collection of both principal and interest is assured by way of collateralization, guarantees or other security. Consumer loans that become 120 days past due are generally charged off. The loan carrying value is analyzed and any changes are appropriately made as described above quarterly. 48 Cash and Cash Equivalents, Liquidity Risk Management and Contractual Commitments Liquidity risk involves the risk of being unable to fund assets with the appropriate duration and rate-based liability, as well as the risk of not being able to meet unexpected cash needs. Liquidity planning and management are necessary to ensure the ability to fund operations cost effectively and to meet current and future potential obligations such as loan commitments and unexpected deposit outflows. Funding sources include primarily customer-based deposits, collateral-backed borrowings, brokered deposits, cash flows from operations, cash flows from our loan and investment portfolios and asset sales, primarily secondary marketing for residential real estate mortgages and marine loans. Cash flows from operations are a significant component of liquidity risk management and the Company considers both deposit maturities and the scheduled cash flows from loan and investment maturities and payments when managing risk. The Company does not rely on and is not dependent on off-balance sheet financing or significant amounts of wholesale funding. Brokered certificates of deposit ("CDs") at December 31, 2019 totaled $472.9 million, compared to $220.6 million at year-end 2018. All of the brokered CDs at December 31, 2019 have maturities of 12 months or less and will mature in 2020. Deposits are a primary source of liquidity. The stability of this funding source is affected by numerous factors, including returns available to customers on alternative investments, the quality of customer service levels, perception of safety and competitive forces. The Company routinely uses debt securities and loans as collateral for secured borrowings. In the event of severe market disruptions, the Company has access to secured borrowings through the FHLB and the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta under its borrower-in-custody program. Cash and cash equivalents, including interest bearing deposits, totaled $124.5 million on a consolidated basis at December 31, 2019, compared to $116.0 million at December 31, 2018. Higher cash and cash equivalent balances at December 31, 2019 reflect favorable deposit growth, as well as proceeds from the sales of available-for-sale debt securities. Contractual maturities for assets and liabilities are reviewed to meet current and expected future liquidity requirements. Sources of liquidity, both anticipated and unanticipated, are maintained through a portfolio of high quality marketable assets, such as residential mortgage loans, debt securities available-for-sale and interest-bearing deposits. The Company is also able to provide short term financing of its activities by selling, under an agreement to repurchase, United States Treasury and government agency debt securities not pledged to secure public deposits or trust funds. At December 31, 2019, the Company had available unsecured lines of $130.0 million and lines of credit under current lendable collateral value, which are subject to change, of $1.1 billion. In addition, the Company had $924.2 million of debt securities and $830.0 million in residential and commercial real estate loans available as collateral. In comparison, at December 31, 2018, the Company had available unsecured lines of $130.0 million and lines of credit of $781.7 million, and $665.7 million of debt securities and $869.8 million in residential and commercial real estate loans available as collateral. The Company has traditionally relied upon dividends from Seacoast Bank and securities offerings to provide funds to pay the Company’s expenses and to service the Company’s debt. During the first, second, third and fourth quarters of 2019, Seacoast Bank distributed $3.3 million, $4.7 million, $4.8 million and $5.2 million, respectively, to the Company and, at December 31, 2019, is eligible to distribute dividends to the Company of approximately $187.3 million without prior approval. No distributions from Seacoast Bank to the Company occurred in 2018. At December 31, 2019, the Company had cash and cash equivalents at the parent of approximately $53.0 million compared to $40.3 million at December 31, 2018. The following table presents contractual obligations. All deposits presented in the table with indeterminate maturities such as interest bearing and noninterest bearing demand deposits, savings accounts and money market accounts are presented as having a maturity of one year or less. The Company considers these low cost deposits to be our largest, most stable funding source, despite no contracted maturity. 49 (In thousands) Deposit maturities Short-term borrowings FHLB borrowings Subordinated debt Operating leases1 One Year or Less $ 5,508,476 86,121 315,000 — 5,626 $ 5,915,223 1Of the $37.0 million, approximately $4.9 million is related to offices taken out of service (closed). Total $ 5,584,753 86,121 315,000 71,085 36,984 $ 6,093,943 Total December 31, 2019 Over One Year Through Three Years 65,328 $ — — — 9,401 74,729 $ $ $ Over Three Years Through Five Years 9,713 — — — 7,459 17,172 Over Five Years $ $ 1,236 — — 71,085 14,498 86,819 Deposits and Borrowings The Company’s balance sheet continues to be primarily funded by core deposits. Total deposits increased $407.5 million, or 8%, to $5.6 billion at December 31, 2019 compared to December 31, 2018. Since December 31, 2018, interest bearing deposits, which includes interest bearing demand, savings and money markets deposits, increased $127.5 million, or 5%, to $2.8 billion at December 31, 2019, noninterest bearing demand deposits increased $20.9 million, or 1%, to $1.6 billion, and CDs increased $259.2 million or 28% to $1.2 billion. Noninterest demand deposits represented 28% of deposits at December 31, 2019 and 30% at December 31, 2018. Core deposit growth reflects our success in growing relationships both organically and through acquisitions. Customer repurchase agreements totaled $86.1 million at December 31, 2019, decreasing $128.2 million, or 60%, from December 31, 2018. Repurchase agreements are offered by Seacoast to select customers who wish to sweep excess balances on a daily basis for investment purposes. The decrease reflects a shift in customer balances to interest bearing deposits in 2019. Public funds comprise a significant amount of the outstanding balance. No unsecured federal funds purchased were outstanding at December 31, 2019 or 2018. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, borrowings were comprised of subordinated debt of $71.1 million and $70.8 million, respectively, related to trust preferred securities issued by trusts organized or acquired by the Company and borrowings from the FHLB of $315.0 million and $380.0 million, respectively. Secured FHLB borrowings are an integral tool in liquidity management for the Company. The Company issued subordinated debt in conjunction with its wholly owned trust subsidiaries in connection with bank acquisitions in previous years. The acquired junior subordinated debentures (in accordance with ASC Topic 805 Business Combinations) were recorded at fair value, which collectively is $4.2 million lower than face value at December 31, 2019. This amount is being amortized into interest expense over the acquired subordinated debts’ remaining term to maturity. All trust preferred securities are guaranteed by the Company on a junior subordinated basis. Under Basel III and Federal Reserve rules, qualified trust preferred securities and other restricted capital elements can be included as Tier 1 capital, within limitations. The Company believes that its trust preferred securities qualify under these capital rules. The weighted average interest rate of our outstanding subordinated debt related to trust preferred securities was 4.75% for the twelve month period ended December 31, 2019, compared to 4.48% in 2018. Go to “Note I – Borrowings” to the Company's consolidated financial statements for more detailed information pertaining to borrowings. Off-Balance Sheet Transactions In the normal course of business, the Company may engage in a variety of financial transactions that, under generally accepted accounting principles, either are not recorded on the balance sheet or are recorded on the balance sheet in amounts that differ from the full contract or notional amounts. These transactions involve varying elements of market, credit and liquidity risk. Lending commitments include unfunded loan commitments and standby and commercial letters of credit. For loan commitments, the contractual amount of a commitment represents the maximum potential credit risk that could result if the entire commitment 50 had been funded, the borrower had not performed according to the terms of the contract, and no collateral had been provided. A large majority of loan commitments and standby letters of credit expire without being funded, and accordingly, total contractual amounts are not representative of our actual future credit exposure or liquidity requirements. Loan commitments and letters of credit expose the Company to credit risk in the event that the customer draws on the commitment and subsequently fails to perform under the terms of the lending agreement. For commercial customers, loan commitments generally take the form of revolving credit arrangements. For retail customers, loan commitments are generally lines of credit secured by residential property. These instruments are not recorded on the balance sheet until funds are advanced under the commitment. Loan commitments were $1.0 billion at December 31, 2019, and $982.7 million at December 31, 2018 (see “Note P-Contingent Liabilities and Commitments with Off-Balance Sheet Risk” to the Company’s consolidated financial statements). Capital Resources and Management Table 6 summarizes the Company’s capital position and selected ratios. The Company's equity capital at December 31, 2019 increased $121.4 million, or 14%, from December 31, 2018, to $985.6 million. The ratio of shareholders’ equity to period end total assets was 13.87% and 12.81% at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The ratio of tangible shareholders’ equity to tangible assets was 11.05% and 9.72% at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Equity has increased as a result of earnings retained by the Company, and as a result of increases in accumulated other comprehensive income ("AOCI") during the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily reflecting the impact of lower interest rates on available- for-sale securities. Activity in shareholders’ equity for the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 follows: (In thousands) Beginning balance at January 1, 2019 and 2018 Net income Issuance of stock pursuant to acquisition of First Green Bancorp, Inc. Stock compensation (net of Treasury shares acquired) Change in accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) Other Ending balance at December 31, 2019 and 2018 For the Year Ended December 31, 2019 864,267 98,739 — 5,004 17,525 104 985,639 $ $ 2018 689,664 67,275 107,486 8,801 (8,959) — 864,267 $ $ Capital ratios are well above regulatory requirements for well-capitalized institutions. Seacoast management’s use of risk-based capital ratios in its analysis of the Company’s capital adequacy are not GAAP financial measures. Seacoast’s management uses these measures to assess the quality of capital and believes that investors may find it useful in their analysis of the Company. The capital measures are not necessarily comparable to similar capital measures that may be presented by other companies and Seacoast does not nor should investors consider such non-GAAP financial measures in isolation from, or as a substitute for GAAP financial information (see “Table 6 - Capital Resources” and “Note N – Shareholders’ Equity”). Total Risk-Based Capital Ratio Tier 1 Capital Ratio Common Equity Tier 1 Ratio (CET1) Leverage Ratio 1For subsidiary bank only Seacoast (Consolidated) 15.71% 15.06% 13.77% 12.20% Seacoast Bank 14.68% 14.04% 14.04% 11.38% Minimum to be Well-Capitalized1 10.00% 8.00% 6.50% 5.00% The Company’s total risk-based capital ratio was 15.71% at December 31, 2019, an increase from December 31, 2018’s ratio of 14.43%. Higher earnings have been a primary contributor. As of December 31, 2019, the Bank’s leverage ratio (Tier 1 capital to adjusted total assets) was 11.38%, compared to 10.49% at December 31, 2018. 51 The Company and Seacoast Bank are subject to various general regulatory policies and requirements relating to the payment of dividends, including requirements to maintain adequate capital above regulatory minimums. The appropriate federal bank regulatory authority may prohibit the payment of dividends where it has determined that the payment of dividends would be an unsafe or unsound practice. The Company is a legal entity separate and distinct from Seacoast Bank and its other subsidiaries, and the Company’s primary source of cash and liquidity, other than securities offerings and borrowings, is dividends from its bank subsidiary. Without Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”) approval, Seacoast Bank can pay up to $187.3 million of dividends to the Company (see “Part I. Item 1. Business”). The OCC and the Federal Reserve have policies that encourage banks and bank holding companies to pay dividends from current earnings, and have the general authority to limit the dividends paid by national banks and bank holding companies, respectively, if such payment may be deemed to constitute an unsafe or unsound practice. If, in the particular circumstances, either of these federal regulators determined that the payment of dividends would constitute an unsafe or unsound banking practice, either the OCC or the Federal Reserve may, among other things, issue a cease and desist order prohibiting the payment of dividends by Seacoast Bank or the Company, respectively. Under a recently adopted Federal Reserve policy, the board of directors of a bank holding company must consider different factors to ensure that its dividend level is prudent relative to the organization’s financial position and is not based on overly optimistic earnings scenarios such as any potential events that may occur before the payment date that could affect its ability to pay, while still maintaining a strong financial position. As a general matter, the Federal Reserve has indicated that the board of directors of a bank holding company, such as Seacoast, should consult with the Federal Reserve and eliminate, defer, or significantly reduce the bank holding company’s dividends if: (i) its net income available to shareholders for the past four quarters, net of dividends previously paid during that period, is not sufficient to fully fund the dividends; (ii) its prospective rate of earnings retention is not consistent with its capital needs and overall current and prospective financial condition; or (iii) it will not meet, or is in danger of not meeting, its minimum regulatory capital adequacy ratios. The Company has seven wholly owned trust subsidiaries that issued trust preferred securities, all of which are guaranteed by the Company on a junior subordinated basis. The Federal Reserve’s rules permit qualified trust preferred securities and other restricted capital elements to be included under Basel III capital guidelines, with limitations, and net of goodwill and intangibles. The Company believes that its trust preferred securities qualify under these revised regulatory capital rules and believes that it will be able to treat all $71.1 million of trust preferred securities as Tier 1 capital. For regulatory purposes, the trust preferred securities are added to the Company’s tangible common shareholders’ equity to calculate Tier 1 capital. The Company’s capital is expected to continue to increase with positive earnings. Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates The Company’s consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, (“GAAP”), including prevailing practices within the financial services industry. The preparation of consolidated financial statements requires management to make judgments in the application of certain of its accounting policies that involve significant estimates and assumptions. The Company has established policies and control procedures that are intended to ensure valuation methods are well controlled and applied consistently from period to period. These estimates and assumptions, which may materially affect the reported amounts of certain assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, are based on information available as of the date of the financial statements, and changes in this information over time and the use of revised estimates and assumptions could materially affect amounts reported in subsequent financial statements. Management, after consultation with the Company’s Audit Committee, believes the most critical accounting estimates and assumptions that involve the most difficult, subjective and complex assessments are: • the allowance and the provision for loan losses; • acquisition accounting and purchased loans; • intangible assets and impairment testing; • other fair value adjustments; • other than temporary impairment of debt securities, and; • contingent liabilities. The following is a discussion of the critical accounting policies intended to facilitate a reader’s understanding of the judgments, estimates and assumptions underlying these accounting policies and the possible or likely events or uncertainties known to the Company that could have a material effect on reported financial information. For more information regarding management’s judgments relating to significant accounting policies and recent accounting pronouncements, see “Note A-Significant Accounting Policies” to the Company’s consolidated financial statements. 52 Allowance and Provision for Loan Losses – Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates Management determines the allowance for loan losses by continuously analyzing and monitoring delinquencies, nonperforming loan levels and the outstanding balances for each loan category, as well as the amount of net charge-offs, for estimating losses incurred in its portfolio. While the Company’s policies and procedures used to estimate the allowance for loan losses are considered adequate by management, factors beyond the control of the Company, such as general economic conditions, both locally and nationally, make management’s judgment as to the adequacy of the provision and allowance for loan losses approximate and imprecise (see “Nonperforming Assets”). The provision for loan losses is the result of a detailed analysis estimating for probable incurred loan losses. The analysis includes the evaluation of impaired and purchased credit impaired loans as prescribed under FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 310, Receivables as well as an analysis of homogeneous loan pools not individually evaluated as prescribed under ASC Topic 450, Contingencies. The provision for loan losses for 2019 was $11.0 million compared to $11.7 million in 2018. The Company incurred net charge-offs in 2019 of $8.1 million compared to net charge-offs of $6.2 million in 2018. For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, net charge-offs represented 0.16% and 0.15%, respectively, of average total loans. In 2018, provision for loan losses included $3.1 million for a single impaired commercial real estate loan, originated in 2007, and moved to nonaccrual status in the second quarter of 2018 and subsequently charged off in the fourth quarter of 2018. Excluding the impact of this loan, the provision in 2019 was higher than 2018, reflecting the effect of portfolio growth. Delinquency trends remain low at year-end 2019, with nonperforming loans increasing $0.1 million from year-end 2018, but totaling 0.52% of loans at December 31, 2019, compared to 0.55% at year-end 2018. Delinquency trends show continued stability (see section titled “Nonperforming Loans, Troubled Debt Restructurings, Other Real Estate Owned, and Credit Quality”). Management continuously monitors the quality of the Company’s loan portfolio and maintains an allowance for loan losses sufficient to absorb probable losses incurred in the loan portfolio. The allowance for loan and lease losses increased $2.7 million, or 8%, to $35.2 million at December 31, 2019, compared to $32.4 million at December 31, 2018. The allowance for loan and lease losses ("ALLL") framework has four basic elements: (1) specific allowances for loans individually evaluated for impairment; (2) general allowances for pools of homogeneous non-purchased loans (“portfolio loans”) within the portfolio that have similar risk characteristics, which are not individually evaluated; (3) specific allowances for purchased impaired loans which are individually evaluated based on the loan's expected principal and interest cash flows; and (4) general allowances for purchased unimpaired pools of homogeneous loans that have similar risk characteristics. The aggregate of these four components results in our total ALLL. The first component of the ALLL analysis involves the estimation of an allowance specific to individually evaluated impaired portfolio loans, including accruing and non-accruing restructured commercial and consumer loans. In this process, a specific allowance is established for impaired loans based on an analysis of the most probable sources of repayment, including discounted cash flows, liquidation or operation of the collateral, or the market value of the loan itself. It is the Company’s policy to charge off any portion of the loan deemed uncollectible. Restructured consumer loans are also evaluated and included in this element of the estimate. As of December 31, 2019, the specific allowance related to impaired portfolio loans individually evaluated totaled $2.9 million, compared to $2.7 million at December 31, 2018. Residential loans that become 90 days past due are placed on nonaccrual and a specific allowance is made for any loan that becomes 120 days past due. Residential loans are subsequently written down if they become 180 days past due and such write-downs are supported by a current appraisal, consistent with current banking regulations. The second component of the ALLL analysis, the general allowance for homogeneous portfolio loan pools not individually evaluated, is determined by applying factors to pools of loans within the portfolio that have similar risk characteristics. The general allowance is determined by applying a migration model to portfolio segments that allows us to observe performance over time, and to separately analyze sub-segments based in vintage, risk rating, and origination tactics. Adjustments may be made to baseline reserves for some of the loan pools based on an assessment of internal and external influences on credit quality not fully reflected in the historical loss experience. These influences may include elements such as changes in concentration, macroeconomic conditions, and/or recent observable asset quality trends. The Company's analysis of the adequacy of the ALLL also takes into account qualitative factors such as credit quality, loan concentrations, internal controls, audit results, staff turnover, local market conditions, employment levels and loan growth. The third component consists of amounts reserved for purchased credit-impaired ("PCI") loans. On a quarterly basis, the Company updates the amount of loan principal and interest cash flows expected to be collected, incorporating assumptions regarding default rates, loss severities, the amounts and timing of prepayments and other factors that are reflective of current market conditions. Probable decreases in expected loan cash flows trigger the recognition of impairment, which is then measured as the present value of the expected principal loss plus any related foregone interest cash flows discounted at the pool’s effective interest rate. Impairments that occur after the acquisition date are recognized through the provision for loan losses. Probable and significant increases in expected principal cash flows would first reverse any previously recorded allowance for loan losses; any remaining 53 increases are recognized prospectively as interest income. The impacts of (i) prepayments, (ii) changes in variable interest rates, and (iii) any other changes in the timing of expected cash flows are recognized prospectively as adjustments to interest income. Disposals of loans, which may include sales of loans, receipt of payments in full by the borrower, or foreclosure, result in removal of the loan from the PCI portfolio. The final component consists of amounts reserved for purchased unimpaired loans ("PUL"). Loans collectively evaluated for impairment reported at December 31, 2019 include loans acquired from acquisitions that are not PCI loans. These loans are performing loans recorded at estimated fair value at the acquisition date. Fair value discount amounts are accreted into income over the remaining lives of the related loans on a level yield basis. The allowance as a percentage of portfolio loans outstanding (excluding PCI and PUL loans) was 0.80% at December 31, 2019, compared to 0.89% at December 31, 2018. The risk profile of the loan portfolio reflects adherence to credit management methodologies to execute a low risk strategic plan for loan growth. New loan production is focused on residential real estate loans, owner-occupied commercial real estate, small business loans for professionals and businesses, as well as consumer lending. Strategies, processes and controls are in place to ensure that new production is well underwritten and maintains a focus on smaller, diversified and lower-risk lending. Concentrations of credit risk, discussed under the caption “Loan Portfolio” of this discussion and analysis, can affect the level of the allowance and may involve loans to one borrower, an affiliated group of borrowers, borrowers engaged in or dependent upon the same industry, or a group of borrowers whose loans are predicated on the same type of collateral. At December 31, 2019, the Company had $1.5 billion in loans secured by residential real estate and $2.4 billion in loans secured by commercial real estate representing 29% and 46% of total loans outstanding, respectively. In addition, the Company is subject to a geographic concentration of credit because it only operates in Florida. It is the Company's practice to ensure that the charge-off policy meets or exceeds regulatory minimums. Losses on unsecured consumer loans are recognized at 90 days past due, compared to the regulatory loss criteria of 120 days. In compliance with Federal Financial Institution Examination Council guidelines, secured consumer loans, including residential real estate, are typically charged-off or charged down between 120 and 180 days past due, depending on the collateral type. Commercial loans and real estate loans are typically placed on nonaccrual status when principal or interest is past due for 90 days or more, unless the loan is both secured by collateral having realizable value sufficient to discharge the debt in-full and the loan is in process of collection. Secured loans may be charged-down to the estimated value of the collateral with previously accrued unpaid interest reversed. Subsequent charge-offs may be required as a result of changes in the market value of collateral or other repayment prospects. Initial charge-off amounts are based on valuation estimates derived from appraisals, broker price opinions, or other market information. Generally, new appraisals are not received until the foreclosure process is completed; however, collateral values are evaluated periodically based on market information and incremental charge-offs are recorded if it is determined that collateral values have declined from their initial estimates. While it is the Company’s policy to charge off loans in the period for which a loss is considered probable, there are additional risks of future losses that cannot be quantified precisely or attributed to particular loans or classes of loans. Because these risks include the state of the economy, borrower payment behaviors and local market conditions as well as conditions affecting individual borrowers, management’s judgment of the allowance is necessarily approximate and imprecise. The allowance is also subject to regulatory examinations and determinations as to adequacy, which may take into account such factors as the methodology used to calculate the ALLL and the size of the ALLL in comparison to a group of peer companies identified by the regulatory agencies. Table 10 provides certain information concerning the Company’s ALLL for the years indicated. Note F to the financial statements (titled "Allowance for Loan Losses") summarizes the Company’s allocation of the ALLL to construction and land development loans, commercial and residential estate loans, commercial and financial loans, and consumer loans, and provides more specific detail regarding charge-offs and recoveries for each loan component and the composition of the loan portfolio at December 31, 2019 and 2018. Acquisition Accounting and Purchased Loans – Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates The Company accounts for acquisitions under ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations, which requires the use of the acquisition method of accounting. All identifiable assets acquired, including loans, are recorded at fair value. Under current GAAP, no allowance for loan losses related to the acquired loans is recorded on the acquisition date as the fair value of the loans acquired incorporates assumptions regarding credit risk. All loans acquired are recorded at fair value in accordance with the fair value methodology prescribed in ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement. The fair value estimates associated with the loans include estimates related to expected prepayments and the amount and timing of expected principal, interest and other cash flows. 54 Over the life of acquired loans designated as PCI, the Company continues to estimate cash flows expected to be collected. The Company evaluates at each balance sheet date whether the present value of the acquired loans using the effective interest rates has decreased and if so, recognizes a provision for loan loss in the consolidated statement of income. For any increases in cash flows expected to be collected, the Company adjusts the amount of accretable yield recognized on a prospective basis over the loan’s remaining life. Intangible Assets and Impairment Testing – Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates Intangible assets consist of goodwill, core deposit intangibles and mortgage servicing rights. Goodwill represents the excess purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired in business acquisitions. The core deposit intangible represents the excess intangible value of acquired deposit customer relationships as determined by valuation specialists. Core deposit intangibles are amortized on a straight-line basis, and are evaluated for indications of potential impairment at least annually. Goodwill is not amortized but rather is evaluated for impairment on at least an annual basis. We performed an annual impairment test of goodwill as required by ASC Topic 350, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other, in the fourth quarter of 2019. Seacoast conducted the test internally, documenting the impairment test results, and concluded that no impairment occurred. Goodwill was not recorded for the Grand acquisition (on July 17, 2015) that resulted in a bargain purchase gain; however a core deposit intangible was recorded. Fair value estimates for acquired assets and assumed liabilities are based on the information available, and are subject to change for up to one year after the closing date of the acquisition as additional information relative to closing date fair values becomes available. Other Fair Value Measurements – Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates “As Is” values are used to measure fair market value on impaired loans, OREO and repossessed assets. All impaired loans, OREO and repossessed assets are reviewed quarterly to determine if fair value adjustments are necessary based on known changes in the market and/or the project assumptions. When necessary, the “As Is” appraised value may be adjusted based on more recent appraisal assumptions received by the Company on other similar properties, the tax assessed market value, comparative sales and/or an internal valuation. Collateral dependent impaired loans are loans where repayment is solely dependent on the liquidation of the collateral or operation of the collateral for repayment. If an updated assessment is deemed necessary and an internal valuation cannot be made, an external “As Is” appraisal will be requested. Upon receipt of the “As Is” appraisal a charge-off is recognized for the difference between the loan amount and its current fair market value. The fair value of the available-for-sale portfolio at December 31, 2019 was greater than historical amortized cost, producing net unrealized gains of $6.1 million that have been included in other comprehensive income as a component of shareholders’ equity (net of taxes). The Company made no change to the valuation techniques used to determine the fair values of securities during 2019 and 2018. The fair value of each security available-for-sale was obtained from independent pricing sources utilized by many financial institutions or from dealer quotes. The fair value of many state and municipal securities are not readily available through market sources, so fair value estimates are based on quoted market price or prices of similar instruments. Generally, the Company obtains one price for each security. However, actual values can only be determined in an arms-length transaction between a willing buyer and seller that can, and often do, vary from these reported values. Furthermore, significant changes in recorded values due to changes in actual and perceived economic conditions can occur rapidly, producing greater unrealized losses or gains in the available-for-sale portfolio. During 2014, management identified $158.8 million of investment securities available-for-sale and transferred them to held-to- maturity. The unrealized holding losses at the date of transfer totaled $3.1 million. For the securities that were transferred into the held-to-maturity category from the available-for-sale category, the unrealized holding losses at the date of the transfer will continue to be reported in other comprehensive income, and will be amortized over the remaining life of the security as an adjustment of yield in a manner consistent with the amortization of a discount. At December 31, 2019, the remaining unamortized amount of these losses was $0.3 million. The amortization of unrealized holding losses reported in equity will offset the effect on interest income of the amortization of the discount. Management believes the securities transferred are a core banking asset that they now intend to hold until maturity, and if interest rates were to increase before maturity, the fair values would be impacted more significantly and therefore are not consistent with the characteristics of an available-for-sale investment. The Company also holds 11,330 shares of Visa Class B stock which, following resolution of Visa’s litigation, will be converted to Visa Class A shares. Under the current conversion rate that became effective September 27, 2019, the Company expects to receive 1.6228 shares of Class A stock for each share of Class B stock, for a total of 18,386 shares of Visa Class A stock. The Company's ownership is related to prior ownership in Visa’s network while Visa operated as a cooperative. This ownership is recorded on the Company's financial records at a zero basis. Also, included in other assets is a $6.4 million investment in a CRA related mutual fund carried at fair value. 55 Other Than Temporary Impairment of Debt Securities – Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates Seacoast reviews investments quarterly for other than temporary impairment (“OTTI”). The following primary factors are considered for securities identified for OTTI testing: percent decline in fair value, rating downgrades, subordination, duration, amortized loan-to-value, and the ability of the issuers to pay all amounts due in accordance with the contractual terms. Prices obtained from pricing services are usually not adjusted. Based on our internal review procedures and the fair values provided by the pricing services, we believe that the fair values provided by the pricing services are consistent with the principles of ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement. However, on occasion pricing provided by the pricing services may not be consistent with other observed prices in the market for similar securities. Using observable market factors, including interest rate and yield curves, volatilities, prepayment speeds, loss severities and default rates, the Company may at times validate the observed prices using a discounted cash flow model and using the observed prices for similar securities to determine the fair value of its securities. Changes in the fair values, as a result of deteriorating economic conditions and credit spread changes, should only be temporary. Further, management believes that the Company’s other sources of liquidity, as well as the cash flow from principal and interest payments from the securities portfolio, reduces the risk that losses would be realized as a result of a need to sell securities to obtain liquidity. Contingent Liabilities – Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates Seacoast is subject to contingent liabilities, including judicial, regulatory and arbitration proceedings, and tax and other claims arising from the conduct of the Company's business activities. These proceedings include actions brought against the Company and/or its subsidiaries with respect to transactions in which the Company and/or its subsidiaries acted as a lender, a financial adviser, a broker or acted in a related activity. Accruals are established for legal and other claims when it becomes probable that the Company will incur an expense and the amount can be reasonably estimated. Company management, together with attorneys, consultants and other professionals, assesses the probability and estimated amounts involved in a contingency. Throughout the life of a contingency, the Company or its advisers may learn of additional information that can affect the assessments about probability or about the estimates of amounts involved. Changes in these assessments can lead to changes in recorded reserves. In addition, the actual costs of resolving these claims may be substantially higher or lower than the amounts reserved for the claims. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company had no significant accruals for contingent liabilities and had no known pending matters that could potentially be significant. Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk Interest Rate Sensitivity Fluctuations in interest rates may result in changes in the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments, cash flows and net interest income. This risk is managed using simulation modeling to calculate the most likely interest rate risk utilizing estimated loan and deposit growth. The objective is to optimize the Company’s financial position, liquidity, and net interest income while limiting volatility. Senior management regularly reviews the overall interest rate risk position and evaluates strategies to manage the risk. The Company's Asset and Liability Management Committee ("ALCO") uses simulation analysis to monitor changes in net interest income due to changes in market interest rates. The simulation of rising, declining and flat interest rate scenarios allows management to monitor and adjust interest rate sensitivity to minimize the impact of market interest rate swings. The analysis of the impact on net interest income over a twelve month period is subjected to instantaneous changes in market rates of 100 basis point and 200 basis point increases and a 100 basis point decrease on net interest income and is monitored on a quarterly basis. These simulations do not include the impact of accretion from purchased credit impaired loans or unimpaired loans. The following table presents the ALCO simulation model's projected impact of a change in interest rates on the projected baseline net interest income for the 12 and 24 month periods beginning on January 1, 2020, holding all other changes in the balance sheet static. This change in interest rates assumes parallel shifts in the yield curve and does not take into account changes in the slope of the yield curve. 56 % Change in Projected Baseline Net Interest Income 2019 2018 Changes in Interest Rates 1-12 months 13-24 months 1-12 months 13-24 months +2.00% +1.00% Current -1.00% 3.6% 1.6% 0.0% (1.5)% 6.7% 2.8% 0.0% (5.4)% 8.4% 4.4% 0.0% (5.3)% 13.3% 7.0% 0.0% (9.2)% The Company had a positive gap position based on contractual and prepayment assumptions for the next 12 months, with a positive cumulative interest rate sensitivity gap as a percentage of total earning assets of 16.4% as of December 31, 2019. This result includes assumptions for core deposit re-pricing validated for the Company by an independent third party consulting group. The computations of interest rate risk do not necessarily include certain actions management may undertake to manage this risk in response to changes in interest rates. Derivative financial instruments, such as interest rate swaps, options, caps, floors, futures and forward contracts may be utilized as components of the Company’s risk management profile. Market Risk Market risk refers to potential losses arising from changes in interest rates, and other relevant market rates or prices. Interest rate risk, defined as the exposure of net interest income and Economic Value of Equity (“EVE”) to adverse movements in interest rates, is the Company’s primary market risk, and mainly arises from the structure of the balance sheet (non-trading activities). The Company is also exposed to market risk in its investing activities. The ALCO meets regularly and is responsible for reviewing the interest rate sensitivity position of the Company and establishing policies to monitor and limit exposure to interest rate risk. The policies established by the ALCO are reviewed and approved by the Company’s board of directors. The primary goal of interest rate risk management is to control exposure to interest rate risk, within policy limits approved by the board of directors. These limits reflect the Company’s tolerance for interest rate risk over short-term and long-term horizons. The Company also performs valuation analyses, which are used for evaluating levels of risk present in the balance sheet that might not be taken into account in the net interest income simulation analyses. Whereas net interest income simulation highlights exposures over a relatively short time horizon, valuation analysis incorporates all cash flows over the estimated remaining life of all balance sheet positions. The valuation of the balance sheet, at a point in time, is defined as the discounted present value of asset cash flows minus the discounted value of liability cash flows, the net result of which is the EVE. The sensitivity of EVE to changes in the level of interest rates is a measure of the longer-term re-pricing risks and options risks embedded in the balance sheet. In contrast to the net interest income simulation, which assumes interest rates will change over a period of time, EVE uses instantaneous changes in rates. EVE values only the current balance sheet, and does not incorporate the growth assumptions that are used in the net interest income simulation model. As with the net interest income simulation model, assumptions about the timing and variability of balance sheet cash flows are critical in the EVE analysis. Particularly important are the assumptions driving prepayments and the expected changes in balances and pricing of the indeterminate life deposit portfolios. Core deposits are a more significant funding source for the Company, making the lives attached to core deposits more important to the accuracy of our modeling of EVE. The Company periodically reassesses its assumptions regarding the indeterminate lives of core deposits utilizing an independent third party resource to assist. With lower interest rates over a prolonged period, the average lives of core deposits have trended higher and favorably impacted our model estimates of EVE for higher rates. The following table presents the projected impact of a change in interest rates on the balance sheet. This change in interest rates assumes parallel shifts in the yield curve and does not take into account changes in the slope of the yield curve. Changes in Interest Rates +2.00% +1.00% Current -1.00% % Change in Economic Value of Equity 2018 15.7% 9.4% 0.0% (13.7)% 2019 13.2% 7.1% 0.0% (16.4)% 57 While an instantaneous and severe shift in interest rates is used in this analysis to provide an estimate of exposure under an extremely adverse scenario, a gradual shift in interest rates would have a much more modest impact. Since EVE measures the discounted present value of cash flows over the estimated lives of instruments, the change in EVE does not directly correlate to the degree that earnings would be impacted over a shorter time horizon, i.e., the next fiscal year. Further, EVE does not take into account factors such as future balance sheet growth, changes in product mix, change in yield curve relationships, and changing product spreads that could mitigate the adverse impact of changes in interest rates. Effects of Inflation and Changing Prices The condensed consolidated financial statements and related financial data presented herein have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, which require the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars, without considering changes in the relative purchasing power of money, over time, due to inflation. Unlike most industrial companies, virtually all of the assets and liabilities of a financial institution are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates have a more significant impact on a financial institution’s performance than the general level of inflation. However, inflation affects financial institutions by increasing their cost of goods and services purchased, as well as the cost of salaries and benefits, occupancy expense, and similar items. Inflation and related increases in interest rates generally decrease the market value of investments and loans held and may adversely affect liquidity, earnings, and shareholders’ equity. Mortgage originations and re-financings tend to slow as interest rates increase, and higher interest rates likely will reduce the Company’s earnings from such activities and the income from the sale of residential mortgage loans in the secondary market. Table 1 - Condensed Income Statement1 (In thousands) Net interest income Provision for loan losses Noninterest income Securities gains (losses), net Gain on sale of Visa stock Other Noninterest expense Income before income taxes Provision for income taxes including tax equivalent adjustment Net income 1On a fully taxable equivalent basis. Balances presented as a percentage of average assets. For the Year Ended December 31, 2017 2018 2019 3.40% 3.50% 3.57% 0.11 0.19 0.16 0.02 — 0.81 2.35 1.89 0.44 1.45% (0.01) — 0.83 2.68 1.45 0.34 1.11% — 0.29 0.83 2.88 1.53 0.71 0.82% 58 Table 2 – Three Year Summary Average Balances, Interest Income and Expenses, Yields and Rates1 (In thousands, except percentages) 2019 Interest Average Balance Yield/ Rate Average Balance 2018 Interest Yield/ Rate Average Balance 2017 Interest Yield/ Rate For the Year Ended December 31, Assets Earning Assets: Securities Taxable Nontaxable Total Securities $ 1,176,842 $ 35,354 3.00% $1,299,089 $ 37,860 2.91% $1,316,972 $ 34,442 2.62% 23,122 695 1,199,964 36,049 3.01 3.00 3.84 5.08 4.66 31,331 1,330,420 1,115 38,975 61,048 2,670 4,112,009 200,194 5,503,477 241,839 3.56 2.93 4.37 4.87 4.39 28,369 1,345,341 1,401 35,843 71,352 2,416 3,323,403 154,043 4,740,096 192,302 4.94 2.66 3.39 4.64 4.06 Federal funds sold and other investments 88,045 3,379 Loans, net Total Earning Assets 4,933,518 250,730 6,221,527 290,158 Allowance for loan losses Cash and due from banks Bank premises and equipment, net Bank owned life insurance Intangible assets Other assets Total Assets Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity Interest-Bearing Liabilities: (33,465) 94,643 69,142 124,803 228,042 126,588 (29,972) 114,936 67,332 124,452 178,287 98,823 (25,485) 106,710 59,842 97,939 115,511 112,004 $ 6,831,280 $6,057,335 $5,206,617 Interest-bearing demand $ 1,114,334 0.36% $ 978,030 0.19% $ 922,353 Savings deposits Money market Time deposits Short term borrowings Federal funds purchased and Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings Other borrowings Total Interest-Bearing Liabilities Noninterest demand Other liabilities Total Liabilities Shareholders' equity Total Liabilities & Shareholders' Equity Cost of deposits Interest expense as % of earning assets 516,526 1,164,938 1,092,516 106,142 4,025 2,015 10,581 21,776 1,431 131,921 3,010 70,939 4,197,316 3,367 46,205 1,641,766 63,405 5,902,487 928,793 $ 6,831,280 0.39 0.91 1.99 1.35 2.28 4.75 1.10 0.69% 0.74% 0.12% 0.06 0.27 0.89 0.45 0.99 3.47 0.46 457,542 1,049,900 811,741 200,839 1,883 811 6,069 11,684 1,804 224,982 4,468 70,658 3,793,692 3,164 29,883 1,492,451 30,621 5,316,764 740,571 $6,057,335 0.18 0.58 1.44 0.90 1.99 4.48 0.79 385,515 868,427 523,646 171,686 377,396 1,065 241 2,348 4,678 781 3,744 70,377 3,319,400 2,443 15,300 1,279,825 36,993 4,636,218 570,399 $5,206,617 0.43% 0.54% 3.85% $ 211,956 0.21% 0.32% 3.73% $ 177,002 Net interest income/yield on earning assets 1On a fully taxable equivalent basis. All yields and rates have been computed using amortized costs. $ 243,953 3.92% Fees on loans have been included in interest on loans. Nonaccrual loans are included in loan balances. 59 Table 3 - Rate/Volume Analysis1 (In thousands) Earning Assets: Securities Taxable Nontaxable Total Securities 2019 vs 2018 Due to Change in: Rate Volume Total 2018 vs 2017 Due to Change in: Rate Volume Total Amount of increase (decrease) $ (3,618) $ (269) (3,887) $ 1,112 (151) 961 (2,506) $ (420) (2,926) (494) $ 126 (368) $ 3,912 (412) 3,500 3,418 (286) 3,132 Federal funds sold and other investments Loans, net Total Earning Assets 1,108 40,873 38,094 (399) 9,663 10,225 377 167 855 4,819 6,218 (1,064) (1,986) 1,765 1,037 3,657 5,273 11,732 691 528 709 50,536 48,319 2,142 1,204 4,512 10,092 17,950 (400) 37,473 36,705 654 8,678 12,832 86 86 770 3,360 4,302 732 484 2,951 3,646 7,813 (373) 197 825 (1,458) (2,269) 2,994 203 16,322 31,997 $ 11 2,241 34,464 $ 710 12,342 490 $ 254 46,151 49,537 818 570 3,721 7,006 12,115 1,022 725 721 14,583 34,954 Interest-Bearing Liabilities: Interest-bearing demand Savings deposits Money market accounts Time deposits Total Deposits Short term borrowings Federal funds purchased and Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings Other borrowings Total Interest Bearing Liabilities 190 13,141 (2,916) $ 1On a fully taxable equivalent basis. All yields and rates have been computed using amortized costs. 13 3,181 34,913 Net Interest Income $ $ Fees on loans have been included in interest on loans. Nonaccrual loans are included in loan balances. Changes attributable to rate/volume (mix) are allocated to rate and volume on an equal basis. 60 Table 4 – Noninterest Income (In thousands, except percentages) Service charges on deposit accounts Trust fees Mortgage banking fees Brokerage commissions and fees Marine finance fees Interchange income BOLI income SBA gains Other Gain on sale of Visa stock Securities gains (losses), net Total Noninterest Income n/m = not meaningful Table 5 - Noninterest Expense For the Year Ended December 31, 2017 2018 2019 % Change 19/18 18/17 $ $ 11,529 4,443 6,490 1,909 1,054 13,399 3,674 2,472 10,545 55,515 — 1,217 56,732 $ $ 11,198 4,183 4,682 1,732 1,398 12,335 4,291 2,474 8,352 50,645 — (623) 50,022 $ $ 10,049 3,705 6,449 1,352 910 10,583 3,426 579 6,177 43,230 15,153 86 58,469 3% 6 39 10 (25) 9 (14) — 26 10 n/m (295) 13% 11 % 13 (27) 28 54 17 25 327 35 17 (100) (824) (14)% (In thousands, except percentages) Salaries and wages Employee benefits Outsourced data processing costs Telephone / data lines Occupancy Furniture and equipment Marketing Legal and professional fees FDIC assessments Amortization of intangibles Foreclosed property expense and net loss (gain) on sale Other Total Noninterest Expense For the Year Ended December 31, 2017 2018 2019 % Change 19/18 18/17 $ $ 73,829 13,697 15,077 2,958 14,284 6,245 4,161 8,553 881 5,826 51 $ 71,111 12,945 16,374 2,481 13,394 6,744 5,085 9,961 2,195 4,300 461 65,692 11,732 14,116 2,291 13,290 6,067 4,784 11,022 2,326 3,361 (300) 15,177 160,739 $ 17,222 162,273 $ 15,535 149,916 $ 4 % 6 (8) 19 7 (7) (18) (14) (60) 35 (89) (12) (1)% 8% 10 16 8 1 11 6 (10) (6) 28 (254) 11 8% 61 Table 6 - Capital Resources (In thousands, except percentages) Tier 1 Capital Common stock Additional paid in capital Retained earnings Treasury stock Goodwill Intangibles Other Common Equity Tier 1 Capital Qualifying trust preferred securities Other Total Tier 1 Capital Tier 2 Capital Allowance for loan losses, as limited Total Tier 2 Capital Total Risk-Based Capital Risk weighted assets Common equity Tier 1 ratio (CET1) Regulatory minimum1 Tier 1 capital ratio Regulatory minimum1 Total capital ratio Regulatory minimum1 Tier 1 capital to adjusted total assets Regulatory minimum $ 2019 5,151 786,138 195,813 (6,032) (205,286) (18,305) (2,924) 754,555 71,085 — 825,640 December 31, 2018 $ 5,136 778,501 97,074 (3,384) (204,753) (24,808) (6,426) 641,340 70,804 — 712,144 $ 2017 4,693 661,632 29,914 (2,359) (147,578) (15,150) (7,320) 523,832 70,521 (1,791) 592,562 35,294 35,294 860,934 $ $ 5,481,325 32,543 32,543 744,687 $ $ 5,159,431 27,184 27,184 619,746 $ $ 4,352,390 13.77% 4.50 15.06 6.00 15.71 8.00 12.20 4.00 12.43% 4.50 13.80 6.00 14.43 8.00 11.16 4.00 12.04% 4.50 13.61 6.00 14.24 8.00 10.68 4.00 11.87 Shareholders' equity to assets 10.96 Average shareholders' equity to average total assets Tangible shareholders' equity to tangible assets 9.27 1Excludes the Basel III capital conservation buffer of 2.5% for 2019, 1.875% for 2018, and 1.25% for 2017, which if not exceeded may constrain dividends, equity repurchases and compensation. 13.87 13.60 11.05 12.81 12.23 9.72 62 Table 7 - Loans Outstanding (In thousands) Construction and land development Residential Commercial Individuals Commercial real estate Owner-occupied Non owner-occupied Residential real estate Adjustable Fixed rate Home equity mortgages Home equity lines 2019 2018 December 31, 2017 2016 2015 $ $ 94,641 86,658 181,299 143,814 325,113 $ 123,326 128,175 251,501 192,067 443,568 $ 97,725 91,043 188,768 154,357 343,125 $ 29,693 57,856 87,549 72,567 160,116 31,650 31,977 63,627 45,160 108,787 1,034,963 1,344,008 2,378,971 970,181 1,161,885 2,132,066 791,400 848,592 1,639,992 623,800 733,792 1,357,592 453,300 556,078 1,009,378 556,453 589,960 69,394 292,056 1,507,863 618,123 370,224 74,127 261,903 1,324,377 487,231 246,884 71,367 233,328 1,038,810 418,276 210,365 44,484 163,662 836,787 429,826 110,391 69,339 114,229 723,785 Commercial and financial 778,252 722,322 606,014 370,589 228,517 Installment loans to individuals Automobiles and trucks Marine loans Other 22,939 91,025 93,274 207,238 20,482 83,606 97,606 201,694 19,006 78,855 90,851 188,712 19,234 78,993 55,718 153,945 14,965 46,534 23,857 85,356 Other loans 967 1,187 724 507 507 Total Loans $ 5,198,404 $ 4,825,214 $ 3,817,377 $ 2,879,536 $ 2,156,330 63 Table 8 - Loan Maturity Distribution (In thousands) In one year or less After one year but within five years: Interest rates are floating or adjustable Interest rates are fixed In five years or more: Interest rates are floating or adjustable Interest rates are fixed Total Commercial and Financial December 31, 2019 Construction and Land Development Total $ 366,771 $ 150,886 $ 517,657 71,001 198,826 59,159 16,783 130,160 215,609 20,051 121,603 778,252 $ $ 48,910 49,375 325,113 $ 68,961 170,978 1,103,365 Table 9 - Maturity of Certificates of Deposit of $100,000 or More Maturity of Certificates of Deposit of $100,000 through $250,000 (In thousands, except percentages) Maturity Group: Under 3 Months 3 to 6 Months 6 to 12 Months Over 12 Months Total Time Deposits December 31, 2019 % of Total December 31, 2018 % of Total $ $ 110,724 78,190 53,702 25,832 268,448 41% $ 29 20 10 100% $ 46,410 33,291 83,280 95,798 258,779 18% 13 32 37 100% Maturity of Certificates of Deposit of more than $250,000 (In thousands, except percentages) Maturity Group: Under 3 Months 3 to 6 Months 6 to 12 Months Over 12 Months Total Time Deposits December 31, 2019 % of Total December 31, 2018 % of Total $ $ 95,351 58,930 34,925 18,113 207,319 46% $ 28 17 9 100% $ 30,542 23,077 68,600 69,722 191,941 16% 12 36 36 100% 64 Table 10 - Summary of Allowance for Loan Loss Experience (In thousands, except percentages) 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 Beginning balance $ 32,423 $ 27,122 $ 23,400 $ 19,128 $ 17,071 For the Year Ended December 31, Provision for loan losses 10,999 11,730 5,648 2,411 2,644 Charge offs: Construction and land development Commercial real estate Residential real estate Commercial and financial Consumer Total Charge Offs Recoveries: Construction and land development Commercial real estate Residential real estate Commercial and financial Consumer Total Recoveries Net loan charge offs (recoveries) TDR valuation adjustments: Construction and land development Commercial real estate Residential real estate Commercial and financial Consumer Total TDR Valuation Adjustments — 248 152 7,550 2,609 10,559 31 744 338 712 595 2,420 8,139 1 61 63 — 4 129 — 3,139 80 3,396 1,411 8,026 27 292 816 325 329 1,789 6,237 — 62 121 — 9 192 — 407 569 1,869 1,257 4,102 896 747 336 226 290 2,495 1,607 2 64 244 — 9 319 — 256 205 439 244 1,271 263 779 726 341 1,144 3,380 226 306 786 1,809 109 3,236 (2,092) 8 132 86 — 5 231 404 700 1,260 531 117 3,012 368 (43) 69 151 6 36 219 Total Allowance for Loan Losses 35,154 $ 32,423 $ 27,122 $ 23,400 $ 19,128 Loans outstanding at end of year1 Ratio of allowance for loan losses to loans outstanding at end of year Daily average loans outstanding1 Ratio of net charge offs (recoveries) to average loans outstanding 1Net of unearned income. $ 5,198,404 $ 4,825,214 $ 3,814,377 $2,879,536 $ 2,156,330 0.68% 0.67% 0.71% 0.81% 0.89% $ 4,933,518 $ 4,112,009 $ 3,323,403 $2,584,389 $ 1,984,545 0.16% 0.15% 0.05% (0.08)% 0.02% 65 Table 11 - Allowance for Loan Losses (In thousands, except percentages) Allocation by Loan Type Construction and land development Commercial real estate loans Residential real estate loans Commercial and financial loans Consumer loans Total Allowance for Loan Losses Year End Loan Types as a Percent of Total Loans Construction and land development Commercial real estate loans Residential real estate loans Commercial and financial loans Consumer loans Total 2019 2018 December 31, 2017 2016 2015 $ 1,842 13,224 7,667 9,716 2,705 $ 35,154 $ 2,233 11,112 7,775 8,585 2,718 $ 32,423 $ 1,642 9,285 7,131 7,297 1,767 $ 27,122 $ 1,219 9,273 7,483 3,636 1,789 $ 23,400 $ 1,151 6,756 8,057 2,042 1,122 $ 19,128 6% 46 29 15 4 100% 9% 44 28 15 4 100% 9% 43 27 16 5 100% 6% 47 29 13 5 100% 5% 47 33 11 4 100% 66 Table 12 - Nonperforming Assets (In thousands, except percentages) 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 December 31, Nonaccrual loans1,2 Construction and land development $ Commercial real estate loans Residential real estate loans Commercial and financial loans Consumer loans Total Nonaccrual Loans Other real estate owned Construction and land development Commercial real estate loans Residential real estate loans Bank branches closed Total Other Real Estate Owned 4,937 6,520 9,479 5,909 110 26,955 197 5,111 241 6,842 12,391 $ 44 $ 238 $ 470 $ 9,220 13,708 3,321 183 26,476 1,543 1,566 297 9,396 12,802 2,833 13,856 2,499 98 19,524 1,268 2,550 60 3,762 7,640 7,341 9,844 246 170 309 6,410 10,290 130 247 18,071 17,386 1,203 3,041 — 5,705 9,949 2,617 3,959 463 — 7,039 Total Nonperforming Assets $ 39,346 $ 39,278 $ 27,164 $ 28,020 $ 24,425 Amount of loans outstanding at end of year2 Ratio of total nonperforming assets to loans outstanding and other real estate owned at end of period $ 5,198,404 $ 4,825,214 $ 3,817,377 $ 2,879,536 $ 2,156,330 0.76% 0.81% 0.71% 0.97% 1.13% Accruing loans past due 90 days or more $ 108 $ 526 $ — $ — $ — Loans restructured and in compliance with modified terms3 1Interest income that could have been recorded during 2019, 2018, and 2017 related to nonaccrual loans was $0.4 million, $1.0 million, and $0.7 million, respectively, none of which was included in interest income or net income. 2Net of unearned income. 11,100 15,559 13,346 19,970 17,711 3Interest income that would have been recorded based on original contractual terms was $0.4 million, $0.5 million, and $0.7 million, respectively, for 2019, 2018 and 2017. The amount included in interest income under the modified terms for 2019, 2018 and 2017 was $0.6 million, $0.7 million, and $0.7 million, respectively. 67 Table 13 - Debt Securities Available-For-Sale (In thousands) U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government agencies 2019 2018 2017 Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations of U.S. government sponsored entities 2019 2018 2017 Private mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations 2019 2018 2017 Collateralized loan obligations 2019 2018 2017 Obligations of state and political subdivisions 2019 2018 2017 Total Debt Securities Available-For-Sale 2019 2018 2017 December 31, Gross Amortized Cost Fair Value Gross Unrealized Gains Gross Unrealized Losses $ 9,914 $ 10,114 $ 7,200 9,475 7,300 9,744 $ 204 106 274 (4) (6) (5) 604,934 567,753 560,396 609,207 554,006 553,525 56,005 55,569 75,152 239,364 212,807 263,579 30,548 39,543 45,118 57,561 55,728 76,021 238,218 209,366 264,309 31,755 39,431 45,861 5,784 300 1,163 1,561 560 1,154 7 1 798 1,208 339 813 $ 940,765 $ 946,855 $ 8,764 $ 882,872 953,720 865,831 949,460 1,306 4,202 (1,511) (14,047) (8,034) (5) (401) (285) (1,153) (3,442) (68) (1) (451) (70) (2,674) (18,347) (8,462) 68 Table 14 - Debt Securities Held-to-Maturity (In thousands) Mortgage-backed securities of U.S. government sponsored entities 2019 2018 2017 Private mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations 2019 2018 2017 Collateralized loan obligations 2019 2018 2017 Total Debt Securities Held-to-Maturity 2019 2018 2017 December 31, Gross Amortized Cost Fair Value Gross Unrealized Gains Gross Unrealized Losses $ 261,369 $ 262,213 $ 2,717 $ 304,423 353,541 297,099 350,184 — 21,526 22,799 — 32,000 40,523 — 21,673 23,460 — 31,123 40,826 — 802 — 277 714 — — 303 $ 261,369 $ 262,213 $ 2,717 $ 357,949 416,863 349,895 414,470 277 1,819 (1,873) (7,324) (4,159) — (130) (53) — (877) — (1,873) (8,331) (4,212) 69 Table 15 - Maturity Distribution of Debt Securities Available-For-Sale (In thousands) Amortized Cost U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government agencies Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations of U.S. government sponsored entities Private mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations Collateralized loan obligations Obligations of state and political subdivisions Total Debt Securities Available-For-Sale Fair Value U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government agencies Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations of U.S. government sponsored entities Private mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations Collateralized loan obligations December 31, 2019 1 Year Or Less 1-5 Years 5-10 Years After 10 Years Total $ 100 $ 2,332 $ 1,317 $ 6,165 $ 9,914 — — — 3,372 3,472 27,378 159,194 418,362 604,934 4,943 — 6,250 — 51,062 56,005 69,338 9,171 170,026 11,755 239,364 30,548 $ 40,903 $ 239,020 $ 657,370 $ 940,765 100 $ 2,353 $ 1,343 $ 6,318 $ 10,114 $ $ — — — 27,908 160,681 420,618 609,207 5,098 — 6,345 — 52,463 57,561 68,911 9,637 169,307 12,350 238,218 31,755 $ 41,704 $ 240,572 $ 661,056 $ 946,855 Obligations of state and political subdivisions Total Debt Securities Available-For-Sale 3,423 3,523 $ Weighted Average Yield1 U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government agencies Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations of U.S. government sponsored entities Private mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations Collateralized loan obligations Obligations of state and political subdivisions Total Debt Securities Available-For-Sale 1All yields and rates have been computed using amortized costs. 2.26% 2.78% 3.81% 3.49% 3.35% — — — 4.17 4.12% 2.79 4.07 — 2.54 2.57 — 3.71 3.82 2.75 3.71 3.57 2.60 2.71 3.74 3.61 3.13 2.91% 2.95% 3.04% 3.02% 70 Table 16 - Maturity Distribution of Debt Securities Held-to-Maturity (In thousands) Amortized Cost Mortgage-backed securities of U.S. government sponsored entities Total Debt Securities Held for Investment Fair Value Mortgage-backed securities of U.S. government sponsored entities Total Debt Securities Held for Investment Weighted Average Yield1 Mortgage-backed securities of U.S. government sponsored entities Total Debt Securities Held for Investment 1All yields and rates have been computed using amortized costs. $ $ $ $ December 31, 2019 1 Year Or Less 1-5 Years 5-10 Years After 10 Years Total — $ 55,483 $ 31,332 $ 174,554 $ 261,369 — $ 55,483 $ 31,332 $ 174,554 $ 261,369 — $ 56,125 $ 32,722 $ 173,366 $ 262,213 — $ 56,125 $ 32,722 $ 173,366 $ 262,213 —% —% 2.36% 2.36% 3.12% 3.12% 2.41% 2.41% 2.49% 2.49% Table 17 - Interest Rate Sensitivity Analysis1 (In thousands) Federal funds sold and interest bearing deposits Securities2 Loans, net3 Other assets4 Earning assets Savings deposits Time deposits Borrowings Interest bearing liabilities Interest sensitivity gap Cumulative gap 0-3 Months 4-12 Months December 31, 2019 1-5 Years Over 5 Years Total $ 38,430 $ — $ — $ — $ 38,430 300,019 1,757,776 25,853 2,122,078 27,786 766,008 535,096 95,035 622,369 25,689 743,093 83,358 342,728 — 431,135 2,068,986 — 2,500,121 943,473 75,041 — 382,035 769,302 — 1,151,337 1,754,630 1,236 — 1,328,890 426,086 1,018,514 $ $ 793,188 $ 317,007 $ 1,481,607 793,188 $ 1,110,195 $ 2,591,802 1,755,866 $ (604,529) $ 1,987,273 1,208,224 5,218,433 51,542 6,516,629 2,809,247 1,185,013 535,096 4,529,356 $ 1,987,273 Cumulative gap to total earning assets 12% 17% Earning assets to interest bearing liabilities 1The repricing dates may differ from contractual maturity dates for certain assets due to prepayment assumptions. 174 160 40% 245 31% 66 2Securities are stated at carrying value. 3Includes loans available-for-sale. 4"0-3 Months" includes FHLB stock for which interest resets quarterly and a mutual fund that invests in CRA qualified debt securities which reprices daily and "4-12 Months" includes Federal Reserve Bank stock for which interest resets semiannually. 71 Stock Performance Graph The line graph below compares the cumulative total stockholder return on Seacoast common stock with the cumulative total return of the NASDAQ Composite Index and the SNL Southeast Bank Index for the same period. The graph and table assume that $100 was invested on December 31, 2014 (the last day of trading for the year ended December 31, 2014) in each of Seacoast common stock, the NASDAQ Composite Index and the SNL Southeast Bank Index. The cumulative total return represents the change in stock price and the amount of dividends received over the period, assuming all dividends were reinvested. Index Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida 12/31/2014 100.00 12/31/2015 108.95 12/31/2016 160.44 12/31/2017 183.35 12/31/2018 189.24 12/31/2019 222.33 NASDAQ Composite Index SNL Southeast Bank Index Source: S&P Global Market Intelligence © 2020 100.00 100.00 106.96 98.44 116.45 130.68 150.96 161.65 146.67 133.56 200.49 188.08 Period Ending 72 SELECTED QUARTERLY INFORMATION QUARTERLY CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) Total noninterest income 16,376 13,943 (In thousands, except per share data) Net interest income: Interest income Interest expense Net interest income Provision for loan losses Net interest income after provision for loan losses Noninterest income: Service charges on deposit accounts Trust fees Mortgage banking fees Brokerage commissions and fees Marine finance fees Interchange income BOLI income SBA gains Other income Securities gains (losses), net Noninterest expenses: Salaries and wages Employee benefits Outsourced data processing costs Telephone / data lines Occupancy Furniture and equipment Marketing Legal and professional fees FDIC assessments Net (gain)/loss on other real estate owned and repossessed assets Other Total noninterest expenses Income before income taxes Income taxes Net income 2019 Quarters 2018 Quarters Fourth Third Second First Fourth Third Second First $ 72,286 $ 72,825 $ 72,237 $ 72,475 $ 70,058 $ 59,154 $ 56,709 $ 55,477 10,526 61,760 4,800 11,877 60,948 2,251 12,101 60,136 2,551 11,701 60,774 1,397 10,074 59,984 2,342 7,592 6,502 5,715 51,562 50,207 49,762 5,774 2,529 1,085 56,960 58,697 57,585 59,377 57,642 45,788 47,678 48,677 2,960 1,096 1,514 483 338 2,978 1,183 2,127 449 153 2,894 1,147 1,734 541 201 2,697 1,017 1,115 436 362 3,387 3,206 3,405 3,401 904 576 2,579 2,539 928 569 3,197 (847) 927 691 2,503 (466) 13,577 915 636 2,266 (9) 12,836 3,019 1,040 809 468 185 3,198 1,091 519 2,833 1,083 1,135 444 194 3,119 1,078 473 2,674 1,039 1,336 461 446 3,076 1,066 748 2,810 (425) 12,714 1,980 (48) 12,291 1,923 (48) 12,721 2,672 1,021 1,402 359 573 2,942 1,056 734 1,639 (102) 12,296 17,263 18,640 19,420 18,506 22,172 17,129 16,429 15,381 3,323 3,645 651 3,368 1,416 885 2,025 — 2,973 3,711 603 3,368 1,528 933 1,648 56 3,195 3,876 893 3,741 1,544 1,211 2,033 337 1,456 4,206 3,845 811 3,807 1,757 1,132 2,847 488 1,458 3,625 5,809 602 3,747 2,452 1,350 3,668 571 1,303 3,205 3,493 624 3,214 1,367 1,139 2,019 431 1,004 3,034 3,393 643 3,316 1,468 1,344 2,301 595 1,004 3 262 (174) (40) — (136) 405 3,081 3,679 612 3,117 1,457 1,252 1,973 598 989 192 4,022 38,057 35,279 8,103 3,405 38,583 34,057 8,452 3,468 41,000 30,162 6,909 4,282 43,099 29,114 6,409 4,165 49,464 20,892 4,930 3,910 37,399 20,680 4,358 4,314 38,246 22,153 5,189 4,833 37,164 23,809 5,782 $ 27,176 $ 25,605 $ 23,253 $ 22,705 $ 15,962 $ 16,322 $ 16,964 $ 18,027 73 Amortization of intangibles 1,456 1,456 (In thousands, except per share data) Per Common Share Data Net income diluted Net income basic Cash dividends declared: Common stock Market price common stock: Low close High close Bid price at end of period 2019 Quarters 2018 Quarters Fourth Third Second First Fourth Third Second First $ $ 0.52 0.53 0.49 0.50 $ 0.45 0.45 $ $ 0.44 0.44 0.31 0.32 $ 0.34 0.35 $ 0.35 0.36 $ 0.38 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 24.21 31.02 30.57 22.54 27.36 25.31 23.19 28.54 25.44 25.49 29.57 26.35 21.74 29.86 26.02 28.30 34.95 29.20 25.61 33.51 31.58 23.96 28.44 26.47 74 FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (In thousands, except per share data) 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 Net interest income $ 243,618 $ 211,515 $ 176,296 $ 139,588 $ 109,487 For the Year Ended and at December 31, Provision for loan losses 10,999 11,730 5,648 2,411 2,644 Noninterest income: Other 55,515 50,645 43,230 37,427 32,018 Securities (losses) gains, net 1,217 (623) 86 Gain on sale of VISA stock Bargain purchase gains, net — — — — 15,153 — 368 — — 161 — 416 Noninterest expenses 160,739 162,273 149,916 130,881 103,770 Income before income taxes 128,612 87,534 79,201 44,091 35,668 Income taxes Net income Per Share Data Net income available to common shareholders: Diluted Basic Cash dividends declared Book value per share common Tangible book value per share Assets Securities Net loans Deposits FHLB borrowings Subordinated debt 29,873 20,259 36,336 14,889 13,527 $ 98,739 $ 67,275 $ 42,865 $ 29,202 $ 22,141 $ 1.90 $ 1.38 $ 0.99 $ 0.78 $ 0.66 1.92 0.00 19.13 14.76 1.40 0.00 16.83 12.33 1.01 0.00 14.70 11.15 0.79 0.00 11.45 9.37 0.66 0.00 10.29 9.31 $ 7,108,511 $ 6,747,659 $ 5,810,129 $ 4,680,932 $ 3,534,780 1,208,224 1,223,780 1,372,667 1,323,001 994,291 5,163,250 4,792,791 3,790,255 2,856,136 2,137,202 5,584,753 5,177,240 4,592,720 3,523,245 2,844,387 315,000 380,000 211,000 415,000 50,000 71,085 70,804 70,521 70,241 69,961 Shareholders' equity 985,639 864,267 689,664 435,397 353,453 75 (In thousands, except per share data) 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 For the Year Ended and at December 31, Performance ratios: Return on average assets 1.45% 1.11% 0.82% 0.69% 0.67% Return on average equity Net interest margin1 Average equity to average assets Return on tangible assets Return on tangible common equity 1On a fully taxable equivalent basis, a non-GAAP measure. 10.63 3.92 13.60 1.56 14.72 9.08 3.85 12.23 1.20 12.54 7.51 3.73 10.96 0.88 9.90 7.06 3.63 9.85 0.75 8.87 6.56 3.64 10.21 0.71 7.59 76 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM Shareholders and the Board of Directors of Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida Stuart, Florida Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida (the "Company") as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2019, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework: (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three- year period ended December 31, 2019 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework: (2013) issued by COSO. Basis for Opinions The Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements and an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB") and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions. Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. 77 Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Critical Audit Matter The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of the critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates. Allowance for Loan Losses – General Allowances - Qualitative Loss Factors As described in Notes A and F to the financial statements, the Company’s allowance for loan losses is a valuation allowance that reflects the Company’s estimation of probable incurred credit losses in its loan portfolio. The allowance for loan losses was $35.2 million at December 31, 2019, which consists of two main components: valuation allowances for loans individually evaluated for impairment (“specific allowances”), representing $2.9 million, and valuation allowances for loans collectively evaluated for impairment (“general allowances”), representing $32.3 million. General allowances are established for loans grouped into pools based on similar risk characteristics. In this process, general allowances factors are based on an analysis of historical charge-off experience, portfolio trends, regional and national economic conditions, and expected loss given default derived from the Company’s internal risk rating process. The determination of the appropriate level of allowances for loan losses for loans collectively evaluated for impairment involves significant judgment and requires the Company to make significant estimates of current credit risks. Changes in these estimates could have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements. The Company’s loss factors for portfolio trends, regional and national economic conditions, and expected loss given default derived from the Company’s internal risk rating process are based on specific quantitative and qualitative trends. These qualitative loss factors consider credit quality, loan concentrations, internal controls, audit results, staff turnover, local market conditions, employment levels, and loan growth, as well as the effects of other external factors. The outstanding principal balance of each loan pool is multiplied by the applicable loss factor to estimate the level of probable incurred credit losses based upon supporting quantitative and qualitative criteria. Thus, the evaluation of these estimates results in loss factors which contribute significantly to the general allowance component of the allowance for loan losses. Management’s allocation relies on a qualitative assessment of risks to determine the quantitative impact the loss factors have on the allowance. Management’s identification and analysis of these loss factors requires significant judgment. We identified auditing the impact of the individual and aggregate qualitative loss factors on the general allowance component of the allowance for loan losses as a critical audit matter as it involved especially subjective auditor judgment. The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included: • Testing the design and operating effectiveness of controls over the evaluation of these estimates used in the loss factors, including controls addressing: The review of the completeness and accuracy of data inputs used as the basis for the adjustments relating to loss factors. The review of the accuracy of the general allowance model calculations. The review of the qualitative and quantitative conclusions related to the loss factors and the resulting allocation to the allowance. • Substantively testing management’s process, including evaluating their judgments and assumptions, for developing the loss factors which included: Evaluation of the completeness and accuracy of data inputs used as a basis for the adjustments relating to loss factors. Evaluation of the reasonableness of management’s judgments related to the qualitative and quantitative assessment of the data used in the determination of loss factors and the resulting allocation to the allowance. Among other procedures, our evaluation considered, the weight of confirming and disconfirming evidence from internal and external sources, loan portfolio performance and third-party data, and whether such assumptions were applied consistently period over period. Analytically evaluating the loss factor allocation year over year and testing allocations for reasonableness. 78 /s/ Crowe LLP Crowe LLP We have served as the Company's auditor since 2014. Fort Lauderdale, Florida February 27, 2020 79 SEACOAST BANKING CORPORATION OF FLORIDA AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (In thousands, except per share data) Interest Income Interest on securities Taxable Nontaxable Interest and fees on loans Interest on federal funds sold and other investments Total Interest Income Interest Expense Interest on savings deposits Interest on time certificates Interest on federal funds purchased and other short term borrowings Interest on Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings Interest on subordinated debt Total Interest Expense Net Interest Income Provision for loan losses Net Interest Income After Provision for Loan Losses Noninterest Income (Note M) Gain on sale of Visa stock Securities gains (losses), net (includes net gains of $6.2 million for 2019, net losses of $96 thousand for 2018 and net gains of $2.0 million for 2017 in other comprehensive income reclassifications) Other Total Noninterest Income Noninterest Expense (Note M) Income Before Income Taxes Income taxes Net Income Share Data Net income per share of common stock Diluted Basic Average common shares outstanding Diluted Basic For the Year Ended December 31, 2019 2018 2017 $ 35,354 $ 37,860 $ 555 250,535 3,379 289,823 16,621 21,776 1,431 3,010 3,367 46,205 243,618 10,999 232,619 884 199,984 2,670 241,398 8,763 11,684 1,804 4,468 3,164 29,883 211,515 11,730 199,785 34,442 913 153,825 2,416 191,596 3,654 4,678 781 3,744 2,443 15,300 176,296 5,648 170,648 — — 15,153 1,217 55,515 56,732 (623) 50,645 50,022 86 43,230 58,469 160,739 162,273 149,916 128,612 29,873 87,534 20,259 98,739 $ 67,275 $ 79,201 36,336 42,865 $ 1.90 1.92 $ 1.38 1.40 52,029 51,449 48,748 47,969 0.99 1.01 43,350 42,613 $ $ See notes to consolidated financial statements. 80 SEACOAST BANKING CORPORATION OF FLORIDA AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (In thousands) Net Income Other comprehensive income (loss): For the Year Ended December 31, 2019 2018 2017 $ 98,739 $ 67,275 $ 42,865 Unrealized gains (losses) on securities available-for-sale 24,892 (13,266) 5,976 Reclassification of unrealized losses on securities transferred to available-for- sale upon adoption of new accounting pronouncement Amortization of unrealized losses on securities transferred to held-to- maturity, net Reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses included in net income (Provision) benefit for income taxes Total Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Comprehensive Income (730) 262 (1,031) (5,868) 17,525 $ 116,264 $ — 550 485 3,272 (8,959) 58,316 — 596 (86) (2,483) 4,003 $ 46,868 See notes to consolidated financial statements. 81 SEACOAST BANKING CORPORATION OF FLORIDA AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (In thousands, except share data) Assets Cash and due from banks Interest bearing deposits with other banks Total Cash and Cash Equivalents Time deposits with other banks Debt securities: Securities available-for-sale (at fair value) Securities held-to-maturity (fair value $262,213 in 2019 and $349,895 in 2018) Total Debt Securities Loans held for sale Loans Less: Allowance for loan losses Loans, Net of Allowance for Loan Losses Bank premises and equipment, net Other real estate owned Goodwill Other intangible assets, net Bank owned life insurance Net deferred tax assets Other assets Total Assets Liabilities Deposits Noninterest demand Interest-bearing demand Savings Money market Other time deposits Brokered time certificates Time certificates of more than $250,000 Total Deposits Securities sold under agreements to repurchase, maturing within 30 days Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings Subordinated debt Other liabilities Total Liabilities Commitments and Contingencies (Notes K and P) 82 December 31, 2019 2018 $ 89,843 $ 34,688 124,531 92,242 23,709 115,951 3,742 8,243 946,855 261,369 1,208,224 865,831 357,949 1,223,780 20,029 11,873 5,198,404 (35,154) 5,163,250 4,825,214 (32,423) 4,792,791 66,615 12,390 205,286 20,066 126,181 16,457 141,740 71,024 12,802 204,753 25,977 123,394 28,954 128,117 7,108,511 $ 6,747,659 1,590,493 $ 1,181,732 519,152 1,108,363 504,837 472,857 207,319 1,569,602 1,014,032 493,807 1,173,950 513,312 220,594 191,943 5,584,753 5,177,240 86,121 315,000 71,085 65,913 214,323 380,000 70,804 41,025 6,122,872 5,883,392 $ $ (In thousands, except share data) Shareholders' Equity Common stock, par value $0.10 per share authorized 120,000,000 shares, issued 51,760,617 and outstanding 51,513,733 shares in 2019 and authorized 120,000,000 shares, issued 51,514,734 and outstanding 51,361,079 shares in 2018 Additional paid-in capital Retained earnings Less: Treasury stock (246,884 shares in 2019 and 153,655 shares in 2018), at cost Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net Total Shareholders' Equity Total Liabilities & Shareholders' Equity December 31, 2019 2018 5,151 5,136 786,242 195,813 (6,032) 981,174 4,465 985,639 778,501 97,074 (3,384) 877,327 (13,060) 864,267 $ 7,108,511 $ 6,747,659 See notes to consolidated financial statements. 83 SEACOAST BANKING CORPORATION OF FLORIDA AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (In thousands) Cash Flows From Operating Activities Net Income Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation Amortization of premiums and discounts on securities, net Amortization of operating lease right-of-use assets Other amortization and accretion, net Stock based compensation Origination of loans designated for sale Sale of loans designated for sale Provision for loan losses Deferred income taxes (Gains) losses on sale of securities Gain on sale of VISA Class B stock Gains on sale of loans Gains on sale and write-downs of other real estate owned Losses on disposition of fixed assets Bank owned life insurance death benefits Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects from acquired companies: Net (increase) decrease in other assets Net (decrease) increase in other liabilities Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities Cash Flows From Investing Activities Maturities and repayments of debt securities available-for-sale Maturities and repayments of debt securities held-to-maturity Proceeds from sale of debt securities available-for-sale Purchases of debt securities available-for-sale Purchases of debt securities held-to-maturity Maturities of time deposits with other banks Net new loans and principal repayments Proceeds from the sale of portfolio loans Purchases of loans held for investment Proceeds from the sale of other real estate owned Proceeds from sale of FHLB and Federal Reserve Bank Stock Purchase of FHLB and Federal Reserve Bank Stock Purchase of Visa Class B stock Proceeds from sale of Visa Class B stock Redemption of bank owned life insurance Purchase of bank owned life insurance 84 For the Year Ended December 31, 2019 2018 2017 $ 98,739 $ 67,275 $ 42,865 6,421 2,548 4,117 (2,005) 7,243 (329,177) 333,591 10,999 6,791 (1,031) — (9,794) (432) 511 (956) 6,353 3,196 — (1,158) 7,823 (303,928) 326,328 11,730 459 485 — (8,961) (107) 1,235 (280) (5,614) (4,206) 117,745 10,331 8,827 129,608 101,674 42,495 202,724 (309,461) — 4,501 (109,614) — (270,791) 6,509 74,120 (75,193) — — 14,218 — 141,223 58,315 64,366 (104,650) — 4,310 (365,816) — (19,541) 10,072 44,731 (51,505) — 21,333 4,232 — 5,614 3,977 — (697) 5,267 (213,027) 211,091 5,648 35,827 (86) (15,153) (7,038) (711) 2,270 — (5,506) (21,432) 48,909 211,173 86,460 235,613 (371,926) (131,439) 4,720 (328,868) 106,815 (55,352) 6,069 48,295 (42,680) (6,180) — 3,609 (30,000) (In thousands) Net cash from bank acquisitions Additions to bank premises and equipment Net Cash Used in Investing Activities Cash Flows From Financing Activities Net increase (decrease) in deposits Net (decrease) increase in federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements Net (decrease) increase in FHLB borrowings with original maturities of three months or less Repayments of FHLB borrowings with original maturities of more than three months Proceeds from FHLB borrowings with original maturities of more than three months Stock based employee benefit plans Issuance of common stock, net of related expense Dividends paid Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: Cash paid during the period for interest Cash paid during the period for taxes New operating lease right-of-use assets New operating lease liabilities For the Year Ended December 31, 2019 2018 2017 — (2,523) (321,341) 22,349 (4,019) (174,600) 23,825 (5,710) (245,576) 407,513 (128,202) (39,769) (1,771) 333,049 11,892 (67,000) 32,000 (204,000) (63,000) — 65,000 60,000 (2,135) — — 212,176 8,580 115,951 979 — — 51,439 6,447 109,504 — — (55) 55,641 — 196,527 (140) 109,644 124,531 $ 115,951 $ 109,504 46,130 $ 28,301 $ 15,125 $ $ 16,000 30,301 34,627 13,200 — — 400 — — — 1,774 1,212 5,664 Supplemental disclosure of non cash investing activities: Transfer of debt securities from held-to-maturity to available-for-sale $ 52,796 $ — $ Transfer from loans to other real estate owned Transfer from bank premises to other real estate owned Transfer from loans held for investment to loans held for sale 5,665 — 801 5,549 9,168 — See notes to consolidated financial statements. 85 SEACOAST BANKING CORPORATION OF FLORIDA AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (Dollars and shares in thousands) Shares Amount Capital Deficit) Stock Income (Loss), Net Total Common Stock Paid-in (Accumulated Treasury Comprehensive Retained Earnings Accumulated Other Balance at December 31, 2016 38,022 $ 3,802 $ 454,001 $ (13,657) $ (1,236) $ Comprehensive income Reclassification of disproportionate tax effects upon adoption of new accounting pronouncement Stock based compensation expense Common stock issued for stock based employee benefit plans Common stock issued for stock options Issuance of common stock, net of related expenses Issuance of common stock, pursuant to acquisition — — — 61 91 — — — — 16 — — 5,267 (15) 1,066 2,703 6,041 270 605 55,371 145,942 42,865 706 — — — — — — — — (1,123) — — — Balance at December 31, 2017 46,918 $ 4,693 $ 661,632 $ 29,914 $ (2,359) $ Comprehensive income Reclassification of disproportionate tax effects upon adoption of new accounting pronouncement Stock based compensation expense Common stock issued for stock based employee benefit plans Common stock issued for stock options — — 32 43 368 — — — — 43 — — 7,823 (6) 1,966 Issuance of common stock, pursuant to acquisition 4,000 400 107,086 67,275 (115) — — — — — — — (1,025) — — (7,513) $ 435,397 4,003 46,868 (706) — — — — — 5,267 (1,138) 1,082 55,641 — 146,547 (4,216) $ 689,664 (8,959) 58,316 115 — — — — 7,823 (1,031) 2,009 — 107,486 Balance at December 31, 2018 51,361 $ 5,136 $ 778,501 $ 97,074 $ (3,384) $ (13,060) $ 864,267 Comprehensive income Stock based compensation expense Common stock issued for stock based employee benefit plans Common stock issued for stock options Other — 30 94 29 — — — 12 3 — — 7,244 (32) 425 104 98,739 — — — — — — (2,648) — — 17,525 116,264 — — — — 7,244 (2,668) 428 104 Balance at December 31, 2019 51,514 $ 5,151 $ 786,242 $ 195,813 $ (6,032) $ 4,465 $ 985,639 See notes to consolidated financial statements. 86 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida and Subsidiaries Note A - Significant Accounting Policies General: Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida (“Seacoast” or the “Company”) is a single segment financial holding company with one operating subsidiary bank, Seacoast National Bank (“Seacoast Bank”). The Company provides integrated financial services including commercial and retail banking, wealth management, and mortgage services to customers through advanced banking solutions, 48 traditional branch offices and nine commercial banking centers operated by Seacoast Bank. Seacoast operates primarily in Florida, with concentrations in the state's fastest growing markets, each with unique characteristics and opportunities. Offices stretch from the southeast, including Fort Lauderdale, Boca Raton and Palm Beach north along the east coast to the Daytona area, into Orlando and Central Florida and the adjacent Tampa market, and west to Okeechobee and surrounding counties. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Seacoast and all its majority-owned subsidiaries but exclude trusts created for the issuance of trust preferred securities. In consolidation, all significant intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated. The accounting and reporting policies of the Company are in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and they conform to general practices within the applicable industries. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. Use of Estimates: The preparation of consolidated financial statements requires management to make judgments in the application of certain accounting policies that involve significant estimates and assumptions. The Company has established policies and control procedures that are intended to ensure valuation methods are well controlled and applied consistently from period to period. These estimates and assumptions, which may materially affect the reported amounts of certain assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, are based on information available as of the date of the financial statements, and changes in this information over time and the use of revised estimates and assumptions could materially affect amounts reported in subsequent financial statements. Specific areas, among others, requiring the application of management’s estimates include determination of the allowance for loan losses, acquisition accounting and purchased loans, intangible assets and impairment testing, other fair value adjustments, other than temporary impairment of securities, income taxes and realization of deferred tax assets and contingent liabilities. Cash and Cash Equivalents: Cash and cash equivalents include cash and due from banks and interest-bearing bank balances. Cash equivalents have original maturities of three months or less, and accordingly, the carrying amount of these instruments is deemed to be a reasonable estimate of fair value Time deposits with other banks: Time deposits with other banks consist of certificates of deposit with original maturities greater than three months and are carried at cost. Securities Purchased and Sold Agreements: Securities purchased under resale agreements and securities sold under repurchase agreements are generally accounted for as collateralized financing transactions and are recorded at the amount at which the securities were acquired or sold plus accrued interest. It is the Company’s policy to take possession of securities purchased under resale agreements, which are primarily U.S. government and government agency securities. The fair value of securities purchased and sold is monitored and collateral is obtained from or returned to the counterparty when appropriate. Securities: Debt securities are classified at date of purchase as available-for-sale or held-to-maturity. Debt securities that may be sold as part of the Company's asset/liability management or in response to, or in anticipation of, changes in interest rates and resulting prepayment risk, or for other factors are stated at fair value with unrealized gains or losses reflected as a component of shareholders' equity net of tax or included in noninterest income as appropriate. Debt securities that the Company has the ability and intent to hold to maturity are carried at amortized cost. Equity securities are stated at fair value with unrealized gains or losses included in noninterest income as securities gains or losses. The estimated fair value of a security is determined based on market quotations when available or, if not available, by using quoted market prices for similar securities, pricing models or discounted cash flow analyses, using observable market data where available. Realized gains and losses, including other than temporary impairments, are included in noninterest income as investment securities gains (losses). Interest and dividends on securities, including amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts on debt securities, is recognized in interest income on an accrual basis using the interest method. The Company anticipates prepayments of principal in the calculation of the effective yield for collateralized mortgage obligations and mortgage backed securities by obtaining estimates 87 of prepayments from independent third parties. The adjusted cost of each specific security sold is used to compute realized gains or losses on the sale of securities on a trade date basis. On a quarterly basis, the Company makes an assessment to determine whether there have been any events or economic circumstances to indicate that a security is impaired on an other than temporary basis. Management considers many factors including the length of time the security has had a fair value less than the cost basis; recent events specific to the issuer or industry; external credit ratings and recent downgrades. Management also assesses whether it intends to sell, or it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell, a debt security in an unrealized loss position before recovery of its amortized cost basis. Debt securities for which there is an unrealized loss that is deemed to be other-than temporary are written down to fair value with the write-down recorded as a realized loss. On January 1, 2019, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2017-12 “Derivatives and Hedging" (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities. Upon adoption, certain debt securities were reclassified from held-to-maturity to available-for-sale. The following table summarizes the impact: (In thousands) Amortized Cost January 1, 2019 Net Unrealized Gain (Loss) Reflected in OCI Fair Value Private mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations Collateralized loan obligations Totals $ $ 21,526 $ 32,000 53,526 $ 147 $ (877) (730) $ 21,673 31,123 52,796 Seacoast Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) system. Members are required to own a certain amount of FHLB stock based on the level of borrowings and other factors, and may invest in additional amounts. FHLB stock is carried at cost, and periodically evaluated for impairment based on ultimate recovery of par value. Both cash and stock dividends are reported as income. Loans: The Company accounts for a loan depending on the strategy for the loan and on the credit impaired status of the loan upon acquisition. Loans are accounted for using the following categories: • Loans and leases held for sale • Loans and leases originated by the Company and held for investment • Loans and leases purchased by the Company, which are considered purchased unimpaired (“PUL), and held for investment • Loans and leases purchased by the Company, which are considered purchased credit impaired (“PCI”) Loans that are held for sale are carried as held for sale based on management’s intent to sell the loans, either as part of a core business strategy or related to a risk mitigation strategy. Loans held for sale and any related unfunded lending commitments are recorded at fair value, if elected, or the lower of cost (which is the carrying amount net of deferred fees and costs and applicable allowance for loan losses and reserve for unfunded lending commitments) or fair market value less costs to sell. Adjustments to reflect unrealized gains and losses resulting from changes in fair value and realized gains and losses upon ultimate sale of the loans are classified as noninterest income in the Consolidated Statements of Income. At the time of the transfer to loans held for sale, if the fair market value is less than cost, the difference is recorded as additional provision for credit losses in the results of operations. Fair market value is determined based on quoted market prices for the same or similar loans, outstanding investor commitments or discounted cash flow analyses using market assumptions. Fair values are based upon estimated values to be received from independent third party purchasers. These loans are intended for sale and the Company believes the fair value is the best indicator of the resolution of these loans. Fair market value changes occur due to changes in interest rates, the borrower’s credit, the secondary loan market and the market for a borrower’s debt. Individual loans or pools of loans are transferred from the loan portfolio to loans held for sale when the intent to hold the loans has changed and there is a plan to sell the loans within a reasonable period of time. Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff are considered held for investment. Loans originated by Seacoast and held for investment are recognized at the principal amount outstanding, net of unearned income and amounts charged off. Unearned income includes discounts, premiums and deferred loan origination fees 88 reduced by loan origination costs. Unearned income on loans is amortized to interest income over the life of the related loan using the effective interest rate method. Interest income is recognized on an accrual basis. As a part of business acquisitions, the Company acquires loans which are recorded at fair value on the acquisition date. Accordingly, the associated allowance for credit losses related to these loans is not carried over at the acquisition date. Any losses after acquisition are recognized through the allowance for loan losses. These loans fall into two groups: purchased unimpaired loans (“PUL”) and purchased credit-impaired loans (“PCI”). PULs demonstrate no evidence of significant credit deterioration and there is an expectation that all contractual payments will be made. The Company determines fair value by estimating the amount and timing of expected future cash flows and assigning a discount or premium to each loan. The difference between the expected cash flows and the amount paid is recorded as interest income over the remaining life of the loan. PCI loans demonstrate evidence of credit deterioration since origination and the risk that all contractual payments will not be made. The Company estimates fair value by estimating the amount of loan principal and interest cash flows expected to be collected, incorporating assumptions regarding default rates, loss severities, the amounts and timing of prepayments and other factors that are reflective of current market conditions on a quarterly basis. Probable decreases in expected loan principal cash flows trigger the recognition of impairment, which is then measured as the present value of the expected principal loss plus any related foregone interest cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate. Impairments that occur after the acquisition date are recognized through the provision for loan losses. Probable and significant increases in expected principal cash flows would first reverse any previously recorded allowance for loan losses; any remaining increases are recognized prospectively as interest income. The impacts of (i) prepayments, (ii) changes in variable interest rates, and (iii) any other changes in the timing of expected cash flows are recognized prospectively as adjustments to interest income. Disposals of loans, which may include sales of loans, receipt of payments in full by the borrower, or foreclosure, result in removal of the loan from the purchased credit impaired portfolio. In contrast, PULs are evaluated using the same procedures as used for the Company’s non-purchased loan portfolio. Under certain scenarios, the Company will grant modifications to a loan when a borrower is experiencing financial difficulties. Such modifications allow the Company to minimize the risk of loss on the loan and maximize future cash flows received from the borrower. Such modifications are referred to as troubled debt restructured (TDR) loans. TDRs are considered impaired and placed in nonaccrual status. If borrowers perform pursuant to the modified loan terms for at least six months and the remaining loan balances are considered collectible, the loans are returned to accrual status. The Company reviews all loans for impairment on a periodic basis. A loan is considered to be impaired when, based on current information, it is probable the Company will not receive all amounts due in accordance with the contractual terms of a loan agreement. The fair value is measured based on either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s observable market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. When the ultimate collectability of the principal balance of an impaired loan is in doubt, all cash receipts are applied to principal. Once the recorded principal balance has been reduced to zero, future cash receipts are applied to interest income, to the extent any interest has been forgone, and then they are recorded as recoveries of any amounts previously charged off. The accrual of interest is generally discontinued on loans, except consumer loans, that become 90 days past due as to principal or interest unless collection of both principal and interest is assured by way of collateralization, guarantees or other security. When interest accruals are discontinued, unpaid interest is reversed against interest income. Consumer loans that become 120 days past due are generally charged off. When borrowers demonstrate over an extended period the ability to repay a loan in accordance with the contractual terms of a loan classified as nonaccrual, the loan is returned to accrual status. Interest income on nonaccrual loans is either recorded using the cash basis method of accounting or recognized after the principal has been reduced to zero, depending on the type of loan. Derivatives: The Company enters into derivative contracts with customers who request such services and into offsetting contracts with substantially matching terms with third parties to minimize the risks involved with these types of transactions. Loan Commitments and Letters of Credit: Loan commitments and letters of credit are an off-balance sheet item and represent commitments to make loans or lines of credit available to borrowers. The face amount of these commitments represents an exposure to loss, before considering customer collateral or ability to repay. Such commitments are recognized as loans when funded. Fees received for providing loan commitments and letters of credit that may result in loans are typically deferred and amortized to interest income over the life of the related loan, beginning with the initial borrowing. Fees on commitments and letters of credit are amortized to noninterest income as banking fees and commissions on a straight-line basis over the commitment period when funding is not expected. 89 Fair Value Measurements: The Company measures or monitors many of its assets and liabilities on a fair value basis. Certain assets are measured on a recurring basis, including available-for-sale securities and loans held for sale. These assets are carried at fair value on the Company’s balance sheets. Additionally, fair value is measured on a non-recurring basis to evaluate assets or liabilities for impairment or for disclosure purposes. Examples include impaired loans, OREO, mortgage servicing rights, goodwill, and long-lived assets. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Depending on the nature of the asset or liability, the Company uses various valuation techniques and assumptions when estimating fair value. The Company applies the following fair value hierarchy: Level 1 – Assets or liabilities for which the identical item is traded on an active exchange, such as publicly-traded instruments or futures contracts. Level 2 – Assets and liabilities valued based on observable market data for similar instruments. Level 3 – Assets and liabilities for which significant valuation assumptions are not readily observable in the market; instruments valued based on the best available data, some of which is internally-developed, and considers risk premiums that a market participant would require. When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities required or permitted to be recorded at and/or marked to fair value, the Company considers the principal market in which it would transact and considers assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability. When possible, the Company looks to active and observable markets to price identical assets or liabilities. When identical assets and liabilities are not traded in active markets, the Company looks to market observable data for similar assets and liabilities. Nevertheless, certain assets and liabilities are not actively traded in observable markets and the Company must use alternative valuation techniques to derive a fair value measurement. Other Real Estate Owned: Other real estate owned (“OREO”) consists primarily of real estate acquired in lieu of unpaid loan balances. These assets are carried at an amount equal to the loan balance prior to foreclosure plus costs incurred for improvements to the property, but no more than the estimated fair value of the property less estimated selling costs. Any valuation adjustments required at the date of transfer are charged to the allowance for loan losses. Subsequently, unrealized losses and realized gains and losses are included in other noninterest expense. Operating results from OREO are recorded in other noninterest expense. OREO may also include bank premises no longer utilized in the course of the Company's business (closed branches) that are initially recorded at the lower of carrying value or fair value, less costs to sell. If fair value of the premises is less than amortized book value, a write down is recorded through noninterest expense. Costs to operate the facility are expensed. Bank Premises and Equipment: Bank premises and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Premises and equipment include certain costs associated with the acquisition of leasehold improvements. Depreciation and amortization are recognized principally by the straight-line method, over the estimated useful lives as follows: buildings - 25-40 years, leasehold improvements 5-25 years, furniture and equipment - 3-12 years. Leasehold improvements typically amortize over the shorter of lease terms or estimated useful life. Premises and equipment and other long-term assets are reviewed for impairment when events indicate their carrying amount may not be recoverable from future undiscounted cash flows. If impaired, the assets are written down to fair value with a corresponding impact to noninterest expense Leases: On January 1, 2019, the Company adopted FASB ASU 2016-02, “Leases”, and all the related amendments (collectively, Accounting Standards Codification “ASC” Topic 842) through a cumulative-effect adjustment. The new guidance requires a lessee to recognize at the transition date right-of-use assets ("ROUA") and lease liabilities for all operating leases. Upon adoption, the Company recognized ROUAs of $29 million and lease liabilities of $33 million. Operating lease liabilities are measured based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. At the transition date, ROUA was determined by adjusting lease liabilities for the carrying balances of deferred rent under ASC Topic 840 Leases, cease-use liabilities under ASC Topic 420 Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations, and assets and liabilities recognized under ASC Topic 805 Business Combinations for acquired operating leases, which aggregated to $4 million. Arrangements are analyzed at inception to determine the existence of a lease. ROUAs represent the right to use the underlying asset and lease liabilities represent the obligation to make lease payments for the lease term. Operating lease ROUAs and liabilities are recognized at commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. As most of the Company's leases do not provide an implicit rate, the Company uses its incremental borrowing rate based on the appropriate term and information available at commencement date in determining the present value of lease payments. The lease term may include options to extend 90 the lease when it is reasonably certain that the option will be exercised. ROUAs and operating lease liabilities are reported in Other Assets and Other Liabilities, respectively, in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Lease expense for lease payments is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term and is classified as Occupancy or Furniture and Equipment expense based on the subject asset. The Company elected certain practical expedients offered by the FASB for all classes of leased assets. As a result, the Company has not reassessed whether existing contracts are or contain leases, nor has the Company reassessed the classification of existing leases. The Company elected not to separate lease and non-lease components and instead accounts for them as a single lease component. The Company also elected to exclude short-term leases from the recognition of ROUAs and lease liabilities. Therefore, if the lease term is equal to or less than twelve months (including the renewal options that we are reasonably certain to exercise) and we are not reasonably certain to exercise any available purchase options in the lease, we do not apply the new lease accounting guidance for those leases. The Company did not elect the hindsight practical expedient, which allows entities to use hindsight when determining lease term and impairment of ROUAs. Intangible assets. The Company’s intangible assets consist of goodwill, core deposit intangibles (CDIs) and mortgage servicing rights. Goodwill results from business combinations and represents the difference between the purchase price and the fair value of net assets acquired. Goodwill may be adjusted for up to one year from the acquisition date in the event new information is obtained which, if known at the date of acquisitions would have impacted the fair value of the acquired assets and liabilities. Goodwill is considered to have an indefinite useful life and is not amortized, but rather tested for impairment annually in the fourth quarter, or more often if circumstances arise that may indicate risk of impairment. If impaired, goodwill is written down with a corresponding impact to noninterest expense. The Company recognizes CDIs that result from either whole bank acquisitions or branch acquisitions. They are initially measured at fair value and then amortized over periods ranging from six to eight years on a straight line basis. The Company evaluates CDIs for impairment annually, or more often if circumstances arise that may indicate risk of impairment. If impaired, the CDI is written down with a corresponding impact to noninterest expense. Bank owned life insurance (BOLI): The Company, through its subsidiary bank, has purchased or acquired through bank acquisitions, life insurance policies on certain key executives. BOLI is recorded at the amount that can be realized under the insurance contract at the balance sheet date, which is the cash surrender value adjusted for other charges or other amounts due that are probable at settlement. Revenue Recognition: Revenue recognized reflects the consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled in exchange for the services provided and is recognized when the promised services (performance obligations) are transferred to a customer, requiring the application of the following five-steps: (i) identify the contract(s) with a customer, (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract, (iii) determine the transaction price, (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract and (v) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. Relevant activity includes: • Service Charges on Deposits: Seacoast Bank offers a variety of deposit-related services to its customers through several delivery channels including branch offices, ATMs, telephone, mobile, and internet banking. Transaction-based fees are recognized when services, each of which represents a performance obligation, are satisfied. Service fees may be assessed monthly, quarterly, or annually; however, the account agreements to which these fees relate can be canceled at any time by Seacoast and/or the customer. Therefore, the contract term is considered a single day (a day-to-day contract). • Trust Fees: The Company earns trust fees from fiduciary services provided to trust customers which include custody of assets, recordkeeping, collection and distribution of funds. Fees are earned over time and accrued monthly as the Company provides services, and are generally assessed based on the market value of the trust assets under management at a particular date or over a particular period. • Brokerage Commissions and Fees: The Company earns commissions and fees from investment brokerage services provided to its customers through an arrangement with a third-party service provider. Commissions received from the third-party service provider are recorded monthly and are based upon customer activity. Fees are earned over time and accrued monthly as services are provided. The Company acts as an agent in this arrangement and therefore presents the brokerage commissions and fees net of related costs. • Interchange Income: Fees earned on card transactions depend upon the volume of activity, as well as the fees permitted by the payment network. Such fees are recognized by the Company upon fulfilling its performance obligation to approve the card transaction. 91 Allowance for Loan Losses and Reserve for Unfunded Lending Commitments: The allowance for loan losses is a valuation allowance for probable incurred credit losses. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when the Company believes the uncollectibility of a loan balance is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance. The allowance for loan losses and reserve for unfunded lending commitments is maintained at a level the Company believes is adequate to absorb probable losses incurred in the loan portfolio and unfunded lending commitments as of the date of the consolidated financial statements. The Company employs a variety of modeling and estimation tools in developing the appropriate allowance for loan losses and reserve for unfunded lending commitments. If necessary, a specific allowance is established for individually evaluated impaired loans. The specific allowance established for these loans is based on a thorough analysis of the most probable source of repayment, including the present value of the loan’s expected future cash flows, the loan’s estimated market value, or the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral depending on the most likely source of repayment. General allowances are established for loans grouped into pools based on similar characteristics. In this process, general allowance factors are based on an analysis of historical charge-off experience, portfolio trends, regional and national economic conditions, and expected loss given default derived from the Company’s internal risk rating process. The Company monitors qualitative and quantitative trends in the loan portfolio, including changes in the levels of past due, criticized and nonperforming loans. The distribution of the allowance for loan losses and reserve for unfunded lending commitments between the various components does not diminish the fact that the entire allowance for loan losses and reserve for unfunded lending commitments is available to absorb credit losses in the loan portfolio. The principal focus is, therefore, on the adequacy of the total allowance for loan losses and reserve for unfunded lending commitments. In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Company’s bank subsidiary’s allowance for loan losses and reserve for unfunded lending commitments. These agencies may require such subsidiary to recognize changes to the allowance for loan losses and reserve for unfunded lending commitments based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination. Income Taxes: The Company uses the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities in the consolidated financial statements and their related tax bases and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that are in effect. A valuation allowance is recognized for a deferred tax asset if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in rates is recognized as income or expense in the period in which the change occurs. Earnings per Share: Basic earnings per share are computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted earnings per share are based on the weighted- average number of common shares outstanding during each period, plus common share equivalents calculated for stock options and performance restricted stock outstanding using the treasury stock method. Stock-Based Compensation: The stock option plans are accounted for under ASC Topic 718 - Compensation - Stock Compensation and the fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with market assumptions. This amount is amortized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period, generally five years. For restricted stock awards, which generally vest based on continued service with the Company, the deferred compensation is measured as the fair value of the shares on the date of grant, and the deferred compensation is amortized as salaries and employee benefits in accordance with the applicable vesting schedule, generally straight-line over five years. Some shares vest based upon the Company achieving certain performance goals and salary amortization expense is based on an estimate of the most likely results on a straight line basis. The Company accounts for forfeitures as they occur. 92 Note B - Recently Issued Accounting Standards, Not Adopted at December 31, 2019 The following provides a brief description of accounting standards that have been issued but are not yet adopted that could have a material effect on the Company's financial statements: ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments –Credit Losses (Topic 326) Description In June 2016, FASB issued guidance to replace the incurred loss model with an expected loss model, which is referred to as the current expected credit loss (CECL) model. The CECL model is applicable to the measurement of credit losses on financial assets measured at amortized cost, including loan receivables and held-to-maturity debt securities. It also applies to off-balance sheet credit exposures not accounted for as insurance (i.e. loan commitments, standby letters of credit, financial guarantees and other similar instruments). Date of Adoption The Company will adopt this accounting standard effective January 1, 2020. Effect on the Consolidated Financial Statements The Company currently expects that the initial adjustment to the allowance for loan losses will be an increase of approximately $19 - $23 million, bringing the ratio of allowance to total loans from 0.68% to between 1.06% and 1.12%. The increase is primarily attributed to the impact of the new guidance on the Company’s acquired loan portfolio, and to the new requirement to estimate losses over the full remaining expected life of the loans. For loans previously classified as purchased unimpaired (“PUL”), the standard requires that a reserve for expected credit losses be recorded through a cumulative effect adjustment in retained earnings, regardless of the impact of a purchase discount on the amortized cost basis. Existing purchase discounts and premiums on these loans are not affected by adoption of the standard, and these amounts will continue to accrete into interest income over the remaining lives of the loans on a level-yield basis. Existing purchased credit impaired (“PCI”) loans will be classified as purchased credit deteriorated (“PCD”) loans, and a reserve for expected credit losses will be established with a corresponding adjustment to the loans’ amortized cost basis. The remaining non-credit discounts on these loans will accrete into interest income on a level-yield basis over the remaining lives of the loans. The estimation process applies an economic forecast scenario which, as of January 1, 2020, projects a stable macroeconomic environment over the Company’s three year forecast period. For portfolio segments with a weighted average life longer than three years, the Company reverts to longer term historical loss experience, adjusted for prepayments, to estimate losses over the remaining life of the loans within each segment. The Company estimates the impact on the tier one capital ratio upon adoption is a decrease of approximately 32 basis points. Federal banking regulatory agencies have provided banks with the ability to mitigate the impact on capital at adoption by allowing the impact to be phased in over a four year period; however, the Company expects to forgo the phased in approach and recognize the impact to capital at the time of adoption. The Company does not expect adoption of the standard to have a material impact to its held-to-maturity debt security portfolio, which is comprised of securities guaranteed either explicitly or implicitly by government- sponsored entities. While available-for-sale debt (“AFS”) securities are not subject to the CECL allowance requirement, the new guidance requires the Company to record an allowance for AFS debt securities in an unrealized loss position if a portion of the unrealized loss is credit related. The Company does not expect adoption of the standard to have a material impact to AFS securities upon adoption. The disclosed estimates are subject to further refinement upon finalization of the Company’s review of the calculations, assumptions, methodologies and judgments. Internal controls over financial reporting relating to these new processes have been designed and implemented and are being evaluated. The Company is in the final stages of completing the formal governance and approval process. The ongoing impact to the Company’s results of operations in future periods will be influenced by the loan portfolio composition and by macroeconomic conditions and forecasts at each reporting date. Adoption of the standard is expected to result in higher volatility in the quarterly provision for credit losses when compared to the Company’s historical results under the incurred loss model. 93 ASU 2017-04, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Description In January 2017, the FASB amended the existing guidance to simplify the goodwill impairment measurement test by eliminating Step 2. The amendment requires the Company to perform the goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount and recognizing an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value. Additionally, an entity should consider the tax effects from any tax deductible goodwill on the carrying amount when measuring the impairment loss. Date of Adoption This amendment is effective for public business entities for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is permitted on annual goodwill impairment tests performed after January 1, 2017. Effect on the Consolidated Financial Statements The impact to the consolidated financial statements from the adoption of this pronouncement is not expected to be material. Note C - Cash, Dividend and Loan Restrictions In the normal course of business, the Company and Seacoast Bank enter into agreements, or are subject to regulatory agreements that result in cash, debt and dividend restrictions. A summary of the most restrictive items follows: Seacoast Bank may be required to maintain reserve balances with the Federal Reserve Bank. The reserve requirement at December 31, 2019 was $38.7 million. There was no reserve requirement at December 31, 2018. The average amount of the reserve requirement in 2019 was $7.9 million compared to $0.9 million in 2018. Under Federal Reserve regulation, Seacoast Bank is limited as to the amount it may loan to its affiliates, including the Company, unless such loans are collateralized by specified obligations. At December 31, 2019, the maximum amount available for transfer from Seacoast Bank to the Company in the form of loans approximated $83.1 million, if the Company has sufficient acceptable collateral. There were no loans made to affiliates during the periods ending December 31, 2019 and 2018. 94 Note D - Securities The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses and fair value of securities available-for-sale and held-to-maturity at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 are summarized as follows: Totals $ 940,765 $ 8,764 $ (In thousands) Debt Securities Available-for-Sale U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government agencies Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations of U.S. government sponsored entities Private mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations Collateralized loan obligations Obligations of state and political subdivisions Debt Securities Held-to-Maturity Mortgage-backed securities of U.S. government sponsored entities Totals (In thousands) Debt Securities Available-for-Sale U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government agencies Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations of U.S. government sponsored entities Private mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations Collateralized loan obligations Obligations of state and political subdivisions Amortized Cost December 31, 2019 Gross Gross Unrealized Unrealized Losses Gains Fair Value $ 9,914 $ 204 $ (4) $ 10,114 604,934 56,005 239,364 30,548 5,784 1,561 7 1,208 (1,511) 609,207 (5) 57,561 (1,153) (1) (2,674) $ 238,218 31,755 946,855 $ $ 261,369 261,369 $ $ 2,717 2,717 $ $ (1,873) $ 262,213 (1,873) $ 262,213 Amortized Cost December 31, 2018 Gross Gross Unrealized Unrealized Losses Gains Fair Value $ 7,200 $ 106 $ (6) $ 7,300 567,753 55,569 212,807 39,543 300 560 1 339 (14,047) 554,006 (401) 55,728 (3,442) (451) (18,347) $ 209,366 39,431 865,831 Totals $ 882,872 $ 1,306 $ Debt Securities Held-to-Maturity Mortgage-backed securities of U.S. government sponsored entities Private mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations Collateralized loan obligations Totals $ 304,423 $ — $ (7,324) $ 297,099 21,526 32,000 277 — $ 357,949 $ 277 $ (130) 21,673 (877) (8,331) $ 31,123 349,895 Proceeds from sales of debt securities during 2019 were $202.7 million, with gross gains of $2.9 million and gross losses of $1.8 million. Proceeds from sales of debt securities during 2018 were $64.4 million with gross gains of $0.2 million and gross losses of $0.7 million. Proceeds from sales of debt securities during 2017 were $235.6 million with gross gains of $1.6 million and gross losses of $1.5 million. Included in "Securities gains (losses) net" is an increase of $0.2 million and a decrease of $0.1 million, respectively, in the value of an investment in shares of a mutual fund that invests in CRA-qualified debt securities in 2019 and 2018. 95 At December 31, 2019, debt securities with a fair value of $133.4 million were pledged as collateral for United States Treasury deposits, other public deposits and trust deposits. Debt securities with a fair value of $94.4 million were pledged as collateral for repurchase agreements. The amortized cost and fair value of securities at December 31, 2019, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because prepayments of the underlying collateral for these securities may occur, due to the right to call or repay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. Securities not due at a single maturity date are shown separately. (In thousands) Due in less than one year Due after one year through five years Due after five years through ten years Due after ten years Held-to-Maturity Fair Value Amortized Cost Available-for-Sale Fair Value Amortized Cost $ — $ — $ 3,472 $ — — — — — — — — 8,582 10,488 17,920 40,462 3,523 8,698 10,979 18,669 41,869 Mortgage-backed securities of U.S. government sponsored entities Private mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations Collateralized loan obligations Totals 261,369 262,213 604,934 609,207 — — — — 56,005 239,364 $ 261,369 $ 262,213 $ 940,765 $ 57,561 238,218 946,855 The estimated fair value of a security is determined based on market quotations when available or, if not available, by using quoted market prices for similar securities, pricing models or discounted cash flows analyses, using observable market data where available. The tables below indicate the fair value of debt securities with unrealized losses and the period of time for which these losses were outstanding at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. (In thousands) U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government agencies Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations of U.S. government sponsored entities Private mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations Collateralized loan obligations Obligations of state and political subdivisions Total temporarily impaired securities Less than 12 months December 31, 2019 12 months or longer Total Fair Value Unrealized Losses Fair Value Unrealized Losses Fair Value Unrealized Losses $ 758 $ (4) $ — $ — $ 758 $ (4) 220,057 (1,461) 104,184 (1,923) 324,241 (3,384) 2,978 88,680 515 (5) — — 2,978 (5) (570) 110,767 (583) 199,447 (1,153) (1) — — 515 (1) $ 312,988 $ (2,041) $ 214,951 $ (2,506) $ 527,939 $ (4,547) 96 (In thousands) U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government agencies Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations of U.S. government sponsored entities Private mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations Less than 12 months December 31, 2018 12 months or longer Total Fair Value Unrealized Losses Fair Value Unrealized Losses Fair Value Unrealized Losses $ 99 $ (1) $ 642 $ (5) $ 741 $ (6) 200,184 (2,235) 623,420 (19,136) 823,604 (21,371) 20,071 (344) 12,739 (187) 32,810 (531) Collateralized loan obligations 238,894 (4,319) — — 238,894 (4,319) Obligations of state and political subdivisions 19,175 (241) 9,553 (210) 28,728 (451) Total temporarily impaired securities $ 478,423 $ (7,140) $ 646,354 $ (19,538) $ 1,124,777 $ (26,678) At December 31, 2019, the Company had $3.4 million of unrealized losses on mortgage backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations of government sponsored entities having a fair value of $324.2 million that were attributable to a combination of factors, including relative changes in interest rates since the time of purchase. The contractual cash flows for these securities are guaranteed by U.S. government agencies and U.S. government sponsored entities. Based on the assessment of these mitigating factors, management believes that the unrealized losses on these debt security holdings are a function of changes in investment spreads and interest rate movements and not changes in credit quality. Management expects to recover the entire amortized cost basis of these securities. At December 31, 2019, the Company had unrealized losses of $1.2 million on collateralized loan obligations with a fair value of $199.4 million. The collateral for these securities is first lien senior secured corporate debt. The Company holds senior tranches rated credit A or higher. Management expects to recover the entire amortized cost basis of these securities. At December 31, 2019, the Company does not intend to sell debt securities that are in an unrealized loss position and it is not more than likely than not that the Company will be required to sell these securities before recovery of the amortized cost basis. Therefore, management does not consider any investment to be other than temporarily impaired at December 31, 2019. Included in other assets at December 31, 2019 is $44.3 million of Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank stock stated at par value. The Company has not identified events or changes in circumstances which may have a significant adverse effect on the fair value of these cost method investment securities. Also included in other assets is a $6.4 million investment in a mutual fund carried at fair value. The Company holds 11,330 shares of Visa Class B stock, which following resolution of Visa litigation will be converted to Visa Class A shares. Under the current conversion ratio that became effective September 27, 2019, the Company would receive 1.6228 shares of Class A stock for each share of Class B stock for a total of 18,386 shares of Visa Class A stock. The ownership of Visa stock is related to prior ownership in Visa's network, while Visa operated as a cooperative. This ownership is recorded on the Company's financial records at zero basis. Note E - Loans The Company accounts for a loan depending on the strategy for the loan and on the credit impaired status of the loan upon acquisition. Loans are accounted for using the following categories: • Loans and leases held for sale • Loans and leases originated by the Company and held for investment • Loans and leases purchased by the Company, which are considered purchased unimpaired (“PUL”), and held for investment • Loans and leases purchased by the Company, which are considered purchased credit impaired (“PCI”) Refer to Note A for further discussion on how the categories above are defined. 97 Loans are also categorized based on the customer and use type of the credit extended. The following outlines the categories used: • Construction and Land Development Loans: The Company defines construction and land development loans as exposures secured by land development and construction (including 1-4 family residential construction), multi-family property, and non-farm nonresidential property where the primary or significant source of repayment is from proceeds of the sale, refinancing, or permanent financing of the property. • Commercial Real Estate Loans: Commercial real estate loans are subject to underwriting standards and processes similar to commercial and industrial loans. These loans are viewed primarily as cash flow loans and the repayment of these loans is largely dependent on rental income from the successful operation of the property. Loan performance may be adversely affected by factors impacting the general economy or conditions specific to the real estate market such as geographic location and/or property type. • Residential Real Estate Loans: The Company selectively adds residential mortgage loans to its portfolio, primarily loans with adjustable rates, home equity mortgages and home equity lines. Substantially all residential originations have been underwritten to conventional loan agency standards, including loans having balances that exceed agency value limitations. • Commercial and Financial Loans: Commercial credit is extended primarily to small to medium sized professional firms, retail and wholesale operators and light industrial and manufacturing concerns. Such credits typically comprise working capital loans, loans for physical asset expansion, asset acquisition and other business loans. Loans to closely held businesses will generally be guaranteed in full or for a meaningful amount by the businesses’ major owners. Commercial loans are based primarily on the historical and projected cash flow of the borrower and secondarily on the capacity of credit enhancements, guarantees and underlying collateral provided by the borrower. The cash flows of borrowers, however, may not behave as forecasted and collateral securing loans may fluctuate in value due to economic or individual performance factors. Minimum standards and underwriting guidelines have been established for all commercial loan types. • Consumer Loans: The Company originates consumer loans including installment loans and revolving lines, loans for automobiles, boats, and other personal, family and household purposes. For each loan type several factors including debt to income, type of collateral and loan to collateral value, credit history and Company relationship with the borrower are considered during the underwriting process. The following table outlines net loans balances by category as of: (In thousands) Loans Construction and land development Commercial real estate Residential real estate Commercial and financial Consumer Total Loans1 (In thousands) Loans December 31, 2019 Portfolio Loans PCI Loans PULs Total $ 281,335 1,834,811 1,304,305 697,301 200,166 $ 4,317,918 $ $ 160 10,217 1,710 579 — 12,666 $ $ 43,618 533,943 201,848 80,372 8,039 867,820 $ 325,113 2,378,971 1,507,863 778,252 208,205 $ 5,198,404 December 31, 2018 Portfolio Loans PCI Loans PULs Total Construction and land development Commercial real estate Residential real estate Commercial and financial Consumer Total Loans1 1Loan balances at December 31, 2019 and 2018 include deferred costs of $19.9 million and $16.9 million, respectively. 301,473 1,437,989 1,055,525 603,057 190,207 $ 3,588,251 151 10,828 2,718 737 — 14,434 $ $ $ $ 141,944 683,249 266,134 118,528 12,674 $ 1,222,529 $ 443,568 2,132,066 1,324,377 722,322 202,881 $ 4,825,214 98 Loan accrual status is a primary qualitative credit factor monitored by the Company’s Credit Risk Management when determining the allowance for loan and lease losses. As a loan remains delinquent, the likelihood increases that a borrower is either unable or unwilling to repay. Loans are moved to nonaccrual status when they become 90 days past due, have been evaluated for impairment and have been deemed impaired. The following table presents the balances outstanding status by class of loans as of: Accruing 30-59 Days Past Due Current December 31, 2019 Accruing Greater Than 90 Days Accruing 60-89 Days Past Due Total Financing Nonaccrual Receivables (In thousands) Portfolio Loans Construction and land development $ 276,984 $ — $ — $ — $ 4,351 $ 281,335 Commercial real estate Residential real estate Commercial and financial Consumer Total Portfolio Loans PULs Construction and land development Commercial real estate Residential real estate Commercial and financial Consumer Total PULs PCI Loans Construction and land development Commercial real estate Residential real estate Commercial and financial Consumer Total PCI Loans 1,828,629 1,294,778 690,412 199,424 4,290,227 43,044 531,325 201,159 78,705 8,039 862,272 148 9,298 587 566 — 10,599 1,606 1,564 2,553 317 6,040 — 942 277 — — 1,219 — — — — — — 220 18 — 315 553 — 431 — — — 431 — — — — — — — — 108 — 108 — — — — — — — — — — — — 4,356 7,945 4,228 110 1,834,811 1,304,305 697,301 200,166 20,990 4,317,918 574 1,245 412 1,667 — 3,898 12 919 1,123 13 — 43,618 533,943 201,848 80,372 8,039 867,820 160 10,217 1,710 579 — 2,067 12,666 Total Loans $ 5,163,098 $ 7,259 $ 984 $ 108 $ 26,955 $ 5,198,404 99 Accruing 30-59 Days Past Due Current December 31, 2018 Accruing Greater Than 90 Days Accruing 60-89 Days Past Due Total Financing Nonaccrual Receivables (In thousands) Portfolio Loans Construction and land development $ 301,348 $ 97 $ — $ — $ 28 $ 301,473 Commercial real estate Residential real estate Commercial and financial Consumer 1,427,413 1,044,375 594,930 189,061 3,852 2,524 5,186 637 Total Portfolio Loans 3,557,127 12,296 PULs Construction and land development Commercial real estate Residential real estate Commercial and financial Consumer Total PULs PCI Loans Construction and land development Commercial real estate Residential real estate Commercial and financial Consumer Total PCI Loans 140,013 680,060 260,781 116,173 12,643 1,209,670 135 8,403 556 74 — 1,931 1,846 1,523 342 — 5,642 — 1,034 — 635 — 9,168 1,669 97 525 1,661 326 2,609 — — — — 31 31 — — — — — — 141 295 — — 436 — — 90 — — 90 — — — — — — 6,486 7,806 1,280 183 1,437,989 1,055,525 603,057 190,207 15,783 3,588,251 — 1,343 3,740 2,013 — 7,096 16 1,391 2,162 28 — 141,944 683,249 266,134 118,528 12,674 1,222,529 151 10,828 2,718 737 — 3,597 14,434 Total Loans $ 4,775,965 $ 19,607 $ 2,640 $ 526 $ 26,476 $ 4,825,214 The reduction in interest income associated with loans on nonaccrual status was approximately $0.4 million, $1.0 million, and $0.7 million, for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively. The Company’s Credit Risk Management also utilizes an internal asset classification system as a means of identifying problem and potential problem loans. The following classifications are used to categorize loans under the internal classification system: • Pass: Loans that are not problems or potential problem loans are considered to be pass-rated. • Special Mention: Loans that do not currently expose the Company to sufficient risk to warrant classification in the Substandard or Doubtful categories, but possess weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention are deemed to be Special Mention. • Substandard: Loans with the distinct possibility that the Company will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. • Doubtful: Loans that have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified Substandard with the added characteristic that the weaknesses present make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values, highly questionable and improbable. The principal balance of loans classified as doubtful are likely to be charged off. Risk ratings on commercial lending facilities are re-evaluated during the annual review process at a minimum, based on the size of the aggregate exposure, and/or when there is a credit action of the existing credit exposure. The following tables present the risk category of loans by class of loans based on the most recent analysis performed as of: 100 (In thousands) Net Loans December 31, 2019 Pass Special Mention Substandard Doubtful Total Construction and land development $ 317,765 $ 2,235 $ 5,113 $ — $ 325,113 Commercial real estate Residential real estate Commercial and financial Consumer Total Net Loans 2,331,725 1,482,278 755,957 203,966 26,827 7,364 11,925 3,209 20,098 18,221 9,496 1,030 321 — 874 — 2,378,971 1,507,863 778,252 208,205 $ 5,091,691 $ 51,560 $ 53,958 $ 1,195 $ 5,198,404 (In thousands) Net Loans December 31, 2018 Pass Special Mention Substandard Doubtful Total Construction and land development $ 428,044 $ 10,429 $ 5,095 $ — $ 443,568 Commercial real estate Residential real estate Commercial and financial Consumer Total Net Loans 2,063,589 1,296,634 707,663 198,367 41,429 3,654 8,387 3,397 27,048 24,089 6,247 1,117 $ 4,694,297 $ 67,296 $ 63,596 $ — — 25 — 25 2,132,066 1,324,377 722,322 202,881 $ 4,825,214 Loans to directors and executive officers totaled $1.7 million and $0.9 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. No new loans were originated to directors or officers in 2019. Concentrations of Credit The Company's lending activity occurs primarily in Florida, with concentrations in the state's fastest growing markets including the Fort Lauderdale, Boca Raton, Palm Beach, Daytona, Orlando and Tampa markets. PCI Loans PCI loans are accounted for pursuant to ASC Topic 310-30. The excess of cash flows expected to be collected over the estimated fair value is referred to as the accretable yield and is recognized in interest income over the remaining life of the loan in situations where there is a reasonable expectation about the timing and amount of cash flows expected to be collected. The difference between the contractually required payments and the cash flows expected to be collected at acquisition, considering the impact of prepayments, is referred to as the nonaccretable difference. The table below summarizes the changes in accretable yield on PCI loans for the years ended: (In thousands) Beginning balance Additions Deletions Accretion Reclassifications from non-accretable difference Ending Balance December 31, 2018 2017 2019 $ 2,924 $ 3,699 $ 3,807 — — (1,778) 703 — (43) (1,291) 559 763 (11) (1,647) 787 $ 1,849 $ 2,924 $ 3,699 See Note S for information related to loans purchased in transactions accounted for as business combinations during the periods presented. 101 Troubled Debt Restructured Loans The Company’s Troubled Debt Restructuring (“TDR”) concessions granted to certain borrowers generally do not include forgiveness of principal balances, but may include interest rate reductions, an extension of the amortization period and/or converting the loan to interest only for a limited period of time. Loan modifications are not reported in calendar years after modification if the loans were modified at an interest rate equal to the yields of new loan originations with comparable risk and the loans are performing based on the terms of the restructured agreements. Most loans prior to modification were classified as impaired and the allowance for loan losses is determined in accordance with Company policy. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2019, there were nine loans totaling $4.7 million modified in a TDR. There were four defaults totaling $3.2 million of loans modified in TDRs within the twelve months preceding December 31, 2019. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2018, there were four loans totaling $0.2 million modified in a TDR and there were no payment defaults on loans that had been modified to a TDR within the previous twelve months. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2017, there was one loan totaling $0.1 million modified in a TDR and there were no payment defaults on loans that had been modified to a TDR within the previous twelve months. The Company considers a loan to have defaulted when it becomes 90 days or more delinquent under the modified terms, has been transferred to nonaccrual status, or has been transferred to other real estate owned. A defaulted TDR is generally placed on nonaccrual and a specific allowance for loan loss is assigned in accordance with the Company’s policy. Impaired Loans Loans are considered impaired if they are 90 days or more past due, in nonaccrual status, or are TDRs. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company’s recorded investment in impaired loans, excluding PCI loans, and related valuation allowance was as follows: (In thousands) Impaired Loans with No Related Allowance Recorded: Construction and land development Commercial real estate Residential real estate Commercial and financial Consumer Impaired Loans with an Allowance Recorded: Construction and land development Commercial real estate Residential real estate Commercial and financial Consumer Total Impaired Loans Construction and land development Commercial real estate Residential real estate Commercial and financial Consumer Total Impaired Loans December 31, 2019 Unpaid Principal Balance Related Valuation Allowance Recorded Investment 4,995 6,070 9,470 3,485 111 62 4,196 4,914 2,567 226 5,057 10,266 14,384 6,052 337 36,096 $ $ $ 5,186 7,590 14,182 4,475 125 78 4,196 4,914 3,115 239 5,264 11,786 19,096 7,590 364 44,100 $ — — — — — 14 220 834 1,731 59 14 220 834 1,731 59 2,858 $ $ 102 (In thousands) Impaired Loans with No Related Allowance Recorded: Construction and land development Commercial real estate Residential real estate Commercial and financial Consumer Impaired Loans with an Allowance Recorded: Construction and land development Commercial real estate Residential real estate Commercial and financial Consumer Total Impaired Loans Construction and land development Commercial real estate Residential real estate Commercial and financial Consumer Total Impaired Loans December 31, 2018 Unpaid Principal Balance Related Valuation Allowance Recorded Investment $ $ $ 15 3,852 13,510 1,191 280 196 9,786 5,537 2,131 202 211 13,638 19,047 3,322 482 36,700 $ 229 5,138 18,111 1,414 291 211 12,967 5,664 2,309 211 440 18,105 23,775 3,723 502 46,545 $ $ — — — — — 22 369 805 1,498 34 22 369 805 1,498 34 2,728 Impaired loans also include TDRs where concessions have been granted to borrowers who have experienced financial difficulty. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, accruing TDRs totaled $11.1 million and $13.3 million, respectively. Average impaired loans for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017 were $35.6 million, $35.3 million, and $30.9 million, respectively. The impaired loans were measured for impairment based on the value of underlying collateral or the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate. The valuation allowance is included in the allowance for loan losses. Interest payments received on impaired loans are recorded as interest income unless collection of the remaining recorded investment is doubtful, at which time payments received are recorded as reductions in principal. For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, the Company recorded $2.0 million, $2.0 million, and $1.5 million, respectively, in interest income on impaired loans. For impaired loans whose impairment is measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows, a total of $0.1 million, $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively, for 2019, 2018, and 2017 was included in interest income and represents the change in present value attributable to the passage of time. 103 Note F - Allowance for Loan Losses Activity in the allowance for loans losses for the three years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 is summarized as follows: (In thousands) December 31, 2019 Construction and land development Commercial real estate Residential real estate Commercial and financial Consumer Total December 31, 2018 Construction and land development Commercial real estate Residential real estate Commercial and financial Consumer Total December 31, 2017 Construction and land development Commercial real estate Residential real estate Commercial and financial Consumer Total Beginning Balance Provision for Loan Losses Charge- Offs Recoveries TDR Allowance Adjustments Ending Balance $ $ $ $ $ $ 2,233 11,112 7,775 8,585 2,718 32,423 1,642 9,285 7,131 7,297 1,767 27,122 1,219 9,273 7,483 3,636 1,789 23,400 $ $ $ $ $ $ — $ (421) $ 1,677 (231) 7,969 2,005 10,999 (248) (152) (7,550) (2,609) $ (10,559) $ 564 4,736 29 4,359 2,042 11,730 $ — $ (3,139) (80) (3,396) (1,411) $ (8,026) $ — $ (471) $ (264) 125 5,304 954 5,648 (407) (569) (1,869) (1,257) $ (4,102) $ 31 744 338 712 595 2,420 27 292 816 325 329 1,789 896 747 336 226 290 2,495 $ $ $ $ $ $ (1) $ (61) (63) — (4) 1,842 13,224 7,667 9,716 2,705 (129) $ 35,154 — $ (62) (121) — (9) 2,233 11,112 7,775 8,585 2,718 (192) $ 32,423 (2) $ (64) (244) — (9) 1,642 9,285 7,131 7,297 1,767 (319) $ 27,122 As discussed in Note A, "Significant Accounting Policies," the allowance for loan losses is comprised of specific allowances for certain impaired loans and general allowances grouped into loan pools based on similar characteristics. The Company's loan portfolio (excluding PCI loans) and related allowance at December 31, 2019 and 2018 is shown in the following tables. Individually Evaluated for Impairment December 31, 2019 Collectively Evaluated for Impairment Total (In thousands) Construction and land development Recorded Investment 5,057 $ Associated Allowance 14 $ Recorded Investment 319,896 $ Associated Allowance 1,828 $ Recorded Investment 324,953 $ Associated Allowance 1,842 $ Commercial real estate Residential real estate Commercial and financial Consumer Total 10,267 14,383 6,052 337 220 834 1,731 59 2,358,487 1,491,770 771,621 207,868 13,004 2,368,754 13,224 6,833 7,985 2,646 1,506,153 777,673 208,205 7,667 9,716 2,705 $ 36,096 $ 2,858 $ 5,149,642 $ 32,296 $ 5,185,738 $ 35,154 104 Individually Evaluated for Impairment December 31, 2018 Collectively Evaluated for Impairment Total (In thousands) Construction and land development Recorded Investment 211 $ Associated Allowance 22 $ Recorded Investment 443,206 $ Associated Allowance 2,211 $ Recorded Investment 443,417 $ Associated Allowance 2,233 $ Commercial real estate Residential real estate Commercial and financial Consumer Total 13,638 19,047 3,322 482 369 805 1,498 34 2,107,600 1,302,612 718,263 202,399 10,743 2,121,238 11,112 6,970 7,087 2,684 1,321,659 721,585 202,881 7,775 8,585 2,718 $ 36,700 $ 2,728 $ 4,774,080 $ 29,695 $ 4,810,780 $ 32,423 Loans collectively evaluated for impairment reported at December 31, 2019 included acquired loans that are not PCI loans. At December 31, 2019, the remaining fair value adjustments for loans acquired was $33.3 million, or 3.84% of the outstanding aggregate PUL balances. At December 31, 2018, the remaining fair value adjustments for loans acquired was $47.0 million, or 3.86% of the outstanding aggregate PUL balances. These amounts, which represent the remaining fair value discount of each PUL, are accreted into interest income over the remaining lives of the related loans on a level yield basis. Provisions for loan losses of $0.7 million and net charge-offs of $0.7 million were recorded for these loans during 2019. Recapture of $0.2 million and net recoveries of $0.1 million were recorded during 2018 and 2017, respectively. The table below summarizes PCI loans that were individually evaluated for impairment based on expected cash flows at December 31, 2019 and 2018. (In thousands) Construction and land development $ December 31, 2019 PCI Loans Individually Evaluated for Impairment Associated Recorded Investment Allowance 160 $ — $ December 31, 2018 PCI Loans Individually Evaluated for Impairment Associated Recorded Investment Allowance 151 $ — Commercial real estate Residential real estate Commercial and financial Consumer Total 10,217 1,710 579 — — — — — 10,828 2,718 737 — $ 12,666 $ — $ 14,434 $ — — — — — 105 Note G - Bank Premises and Equipment Bank premises and equipment as of: (In thousands) December 31, 2019 Premises (including land of $18,546) Furniture and equipment Total December 31, 2018 Premises (including land of $18,546) Furniture and equipment Total Accumulated Depreciation & Amortization Net Carrying Value Cost $ $ $ $ 83,020 37,364 120,384 85,027 36,892 121,919 $ $ $ $ (26,180) $ (27,589) (53,769) $ (26,107) $ (24,788) (50,895) $ 56,840 9,775 66,615 58,920 12,104 71,024 Note H - Goodwill and Acquired Intangible Assets The following table presents changes in the carrying amount of goodwill: (In thousands) Beginning of year Changes from business combinations Total For the Year Ended December 31, 2019 2018 2017 $ $ 204,753 533 205,286 $ $ 147,578 57,175 204,753 $ $ 64,649 82,929 147,578 The Company performs an analysis for goodwill impairment on an annual basis. Based on the analysis performed in the fourth quarter, the Company has concluded goodwill was not impaired as of December 31, 2019 and 2018. Acquired intangible assets consist of core deposit intangibles ("CDI"), which are intangible assets arising from the purchase of deposits separately or from bank acquisitions. The change in balance for CDI is as follows: (In thousands) Beginning of year Acquired CDI, including measurement period adjustments Amortization expense End of year (In months) For the Year Ended December 31, 2019 2018 2017 $ $ 24,807 (676) (5,826) 18,305 $ $ 18,937 $ 10,170 (4,300) 24,807 $ 14,572 7,726 (3,361) 18,937 Remaining average amortization period for CDI 47 58 63 The gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization of the Company's CDI subject to amortization as of: (In thousands) Deposit base December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018 Gross Carrying Amount Accumulated Amortization Gross Carrying Amount $ 36,015 $ (17,710) $ 36,691 Accumulated Amortization (11,884) $ 106 The annual amortization expense for the Company's CDI determined using the straight line method for each of the five years subsequent to December 31, 2019 is $5.7 million, $4.5 million, $4.0 million, $3.3 million and $0.6 million, respectively. Mortgage servicing rights ("MSRs") retained from the sale of Small Business Administration ("SBA") guarantees totaled $1.8 million and $1.1 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Note I - Borrowings A significant portion of the Company's short-term borrowings were comprised of securities sold under agreements to repurchase with overnight maturities: (In thousands) Maximum amount outstanding at any month end Weighted average interest rate at end of year Average amount outstanding Weighted average interest rate during the year For the Year Ended December 31, 2017 2018 2019 $ 216,094 $ 341,213 $ 193,388 1.17% 1.14% 0.71% $ 106,142 $ 200,839 $ 171,686 1.35% 0.90% 0.46% Securities sold under agreements to repurchase are accounted for as secured borrowings. For securities sold under agreements to repurchase, the Company would be obligated to provide additional collateral in the event of a significant decline in fair value of collateral pledged. Company securities pledged were as follows by collateral type and maturity as of: (In thousands) Fair value of pledged securities - overnight and continuous: Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations of U.S. government sponsored entities December 31, 2018 2017 2019 $ 94,354 $ 246,829 $ 248,654 At December 31, 2019, Seacoast Bank had secured lines of credit of $2.1 billion, of which $315 million was outstanding from the Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB"). During 2019, the average interest rate on short-term borrowings was 2.28% and the weighted average interest rate on balances outstanding at December 31, 2019 was 1.72%. The following table summarizes the Company's junior subordinated debentures and related trust preferred and common equity securities as of December 31, 2019: 107 (In thousands) Description Issuance Date Acquisition Date1 Maturity Date Junior Subordinated Debt Trust Preferred Securities Common Equity Securities Contractual Interest Rate Interest Rate at December 31, 2019 SBCF Capital Trust I 3/31/2005 SBCF Statutory Trust II 12/16/2005 SBCF Statutory Trust III 6/29/2007 n/a n/a n/a 3/31/2035 $ 20,619 $ 20,000 $ 619 12/16/2035 20,619 20,000 6/15/2037 12,372 12,000 BANKshares, Inc. Statutory Trust I BANKshares, Inc. Statutory Trust II BANKshares, Inc. Capital Trust I Grand Bank Capital Trust I 12/19/2002 10/1/2014 12/26/2032 5,155 5,000 3/17/2004 10/1/2014 3/17/2034 4,124 4,000 12/15/2005 10/1/2014 12/15/2035 5,155 5,000 10/29/2004 7/17/2015 10/29/2034 7,217 7,000 3 month LIBOR +175bps 3 month LIBOR +133bps 3 month LIBOR +135bps 3 month LIBOR +325bps 3 month LIBOR +279bps 3 month LIBOR +139bps 3 month LIBOR +198bps 3.69% 3.22% 3.24% 5.20% 4.69% 3.30% 3.94% 619 372 155 124 155 217 $ 1Acquired junior subordinated debentures were recorded at their acquisition date fair values, which collectively was $5.6 million lower than face value; this amount is being amortized into interest expense over the remaining term to maturity. 75,261 73,000 2,261 $ $ Interest on the trust preferred securities is calculated on the basis of 3-month LIBOR plus spread and is re-set quarterly. The trust preferred securities may be redeemed without penalty, upon approval of the Federal Reserve or upon occurrence of certain events affecting their tax or regulatory capital treatment. Distributions on the trust preferred securities are payable quarterly in March, June, September, and December of each year. The proceeds of the offering of trust preferred securities and common equity securities were used by SBCF Capital Trust I and SBCF Statutory Trust II to purchase the $41.2 million junior subordinated deferrable interest notes issued by the Company, and by SBCF Statutory Trust III to purchase the $12.4 million junior subordinated deferrable interest notes issued by the Company, all of which have terms substantially similar to the trust preferred securities. The Company has the right to defer payments of interest on the notes at any time or from time to time at the Company's election. Interest can be deferred for a period not longer than five years. If the Company elects to defer interest, it may not, with certain exceptions, declare or pay any dividends or distributions on its capital stock or purchase or acquire any of its capital stock. As of December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, all interest payments on trust preferred securities were current. The Company has entered into agreements to guarantee the payments of distributions on the trust preferred securities and payments of redemption of the trust preferred securities. Under these agreements, the Company also agrees, on a subordinated basis, to pay expenses and liabilities of the Trusts other than those arising under the trust preferred securities. The obligations of the Company under the junior subordinated notes, the trust agreement establishing the Trusts, the guarantees and agreements as to expenses and liabilities, in aggregate, constitute a full and conditional guarantee by the Company of the Trusts' obligations under the trust preferred securities. Note J - Employee Benefits and Stock Compensation The Company’s defined contribution plan covers substantially all employees after one year of service and includes a matching benefit for employees who can elect to defer a portion of their compensation. In addition, amounts of compensation contributed by employees are matched on a percentage basis under the plan. The Company's contributions to this plan charged to operations were $2.4 million in 2019, $2.1 million in 2018, and $1.9 million in 2017. The Company, through its Compensation and Governance Committee of the board of directors (the “Compensation Committee”), offers equity compensation to employees and non-employee directors of Seacoast and Seacoast Bank in the form of various share- based awards, including stock options, restricted stock awards (“RSAs”), or restricted stock units (“RSUs”). The awards may vest over time, have certain performance based criteria, or both. 108 Stock options are granted with an exercise price at least equal to the market price of the Company’s stock at the date of grant. The fair value of options granted is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Compensation cost is amortized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. Vesting is determined by the Compensation Committee at the time of grant, generally over five years. The options have a maximum term of ten years. The fair value of RSAs and RSUs are estimated based on the price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. Compensation cost is measured straight-line for RSAs and ratably for RSUs over the vesting period of the awards and reversed for awards which are forfeited due to unfulfilled service or performance criteria. To the extent the Company has treasury shares available, stock options exercised or stock grants awarded may be issued from treasury shares. If treasury shares are insufficient, the Company can issue new shares. Vesting of share-based awards is immediately accelerated on death or disability of the recipient. The Compensation Committee may, at its discretion, accelerate vesting upon retirement (including a voluntary termination of employment at age 55) for those employees with five or more years of service with the Company, or upon the event of a change-in-control. Awards are currently granted under the Seacoast 2013 Incentive Plan (“2013 Plan”), which shareholders approved on May 23, 2013 and has been twice amended to increase the number of authorized shares for issuance thereunder to 4,250,000. The 2013 Plan expires on May 26, 2025. Approximately 1,057,000 shares remain available for issuance as of December 31, 2019. The impact of share-based compensation on the Company’s financial results is presented below: (In thousands) Share-based compensation expense Income tax benefit For the Year Ended December 31, 2017 2018 2019 $ $ 7,244 (1,723) 7,823 (1,911) 5,267 (1,966) The total unrecognized compensation cost and the weighted-average period over which unrecognized compensation cost is expected to be recognized related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements at December 31, 2019 is presented below: (In thousands) Restricted stock awards Restricted stock units Stock options Total Restricted Stock Awards Unrecognized Compensation Cost Weighted-Average Period Remaining (Years) $ $ 3,577 3,921 697 8,195 1.6 1.7 0.9 1.6 RSAs are granted to various employees and vest over time, generally three years. Compensation cost of RSAs is based on the market value of the Company’s common stock at the date of grant and is recognized over the required service period on a straight- line basis. The Company’s accounting policy is to recognize forfeitures as they occur. A summary of the status of the Company’s non-vested RSAs as of December 31, 2019, and changes during the year then ended, is presented below: Non-vested at January 1, 2019 Granted Forfeited/Canceled Vested Non-vested at December 31, 2019 109 Restricted Award Shares Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value 295,130 $ 157,861 (63,666) (175,374) 213,951 24.09 26.86 25.83 23.54 26.07 Information regarding restricted stock awards during each of the following years is presented below: Shares granted Weighted-average grant date fair value Fair value of awards vested1 1Based on grant date fair value, in thousands Restricted Stock Units Year Ended December 31, 2019 2018 2017 157,861 242,613 114,331 $ $ 26.86 4,128 $ $ 26.48 2,515 $ $ 24.08 1,407 RSUs granted in 2019 allow the grantee to earn 0%-225% while RSUs granted in 2018 and 2017 allow the grantee to earn 0%-200% of the target award all based on the Company's adjusted earnings per share growth or its adjusted return on average tangible equity, each measured over a three year period beginning with the year of grant. Certain RSUs granted in 2016 allow the grantee to earn 0%-200% of the target award as determined by both the Company's adjusted net income and its adjusted return on tangible equity. The 2016 awards measure performance through December 31, 2019. A summary of the status of the Company’s non-vested RSUs as of December 31, 2019, and changes during the year then ended, is presented below: Non-vested at January 1, 2019 Granted Forfeited/Canceled Vested Non-vested at December 31, 2019 Information regarding restricted stock units during each of the following years: Shares granted Weighted-average grant date fair value Fair value of awards vested1 1Based on grant date fair value Stock Options $ $ Restricted Award Shares Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value 503,111 $ 75,002 (8,242) (187,941) 381,930 19.69 30.02 20.29 15.24 23.89 For the Year Ended December 31, 2017 2018 2019 164,268 173,193 23.94 24.02 937 1,095 75,002 30.02 2,864 $ $ $ $ The Company estimated the fair value of each option grant on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes options-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions: Risk-free interest rates Expected dividend yield Expected volatility Expected lives (years) For the Year Ended December 31, 2017 2018 2019 2.53% —% 34.5% 5.0 2.56% —% 26.6% 5.0 1.85% —% 25.4% 5.0 A summary of the Company’s stock options as of December 31, 2019, and changes during the year then ended, are presented below: 110 Outstanding at January 1, 2019 Granted Exercised Forfeited Outstanding at December 31, 2019 Exercisable at December 31, 2019 Options 933,495 3,438 (28,824) (4,330) 903,779 633,561 Weighted- Average Exercise Price 22.00 $ 28.42 14.86 29.17 22.22 19.82 Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years) Aggregate Intrinsic Value (000s) $ 6.14 5.65 7,669 6,848 Information related to stock options during each of the following years: Options granted Weighted-average grant date fair value Intrinsic value of stock options exercised $ For the Year Ended December 31, 2017 2018 2019 297,576 219,118 4.66 5.65 1,143 3,045 3,438 28.42 277 $ $ The following table summarizes information related to stock options as of December 31, 2019: Range of Exercise Prices $10.54 to $14.82 $15.99 to $28.69 $31.15 to $31.15 Total Employee Stock Purchase Plan Options Outstanding 368,611 326,909 208,259 903,779 Remaining Contractual Life (Years) 4.2 7.1 8.2 6.1 Options Exercisable 334,016 229,824 69,721 633,561 $ $ Weighted Average Exercise Price 12.42 27.16 31.15 19.82 Under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”), as amended, was approved by shareholders on April 25, 1989, and additional shares were authorized for issuance by shareholders on June 18, 2009 and May 2, 2013. Under the ESPP, the Company is authorized to issue up to 300,000 common shares of the Company’s common stock to eligible employees of the Company. These shares may be purchased by employees at a price equal to 95% of the fair market value of the shares on the purchase date. Purchases under the ESPP are made monthly. Employee contributions to the ESPP are made through payroll deductions. ESPP shares purchased Weighted-average employee purchase price Note K - Lease Commitments 2019 2018 2017 16,320 25.39 $ 15,225 26.85 $ 12,434 22.67 $ The Company is the lessee in various noncancellable operating leases for land, buildings, and equipment. Certain leases contain provisions for variable lease payments that are linked to the consumer price index. Lease cost for the year ended December 31, 2019 consists of: 111 (In thousands) Operating lease cost Variable lease cost Short-term lease cost Sublease income Total lease cost For the Year Ended December 31, 2019 $ $ 5,570 1,211 715 (618) 6,878 The following table provides supplemental information related to leases as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019: (In thousands, except for weighted average data) December 31, 2019 Operating lease right-of-use assets Operating lease liabilities Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of operating lease liabilities Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new operating lease obligations Weighted average remaining lease term for operating leases Weighted average discount rate for operating leases $ 26,165 30,098 5,936 1,224 8.5 years 4.70% The Company’s lease agreements often include one or more options to renew at the Company’s discretion. If, at lease inception, the Company considers the exercising of a renewal option to be reasonably certain, the Company includes the extended term in the calculation of the lease liability. Maturities of lease liabilities as of December 31, 2019 are as follows: For the Year Ended December 31, 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Thereafter Total undiscounted cash flows Less: Net present value adjustment Total Note L - Income Taxes The provision for income taxes is as follows: (In thousands) Current Federal State Deferred Federal State (In thousands) 5,626 4,965 4,436 3,725 3,734 14,498 36,984 (6,886) 30,098 $ $ For the Year Ended December 31, 2018 2017 2019 $ $ $ 20,954 1,932 $ 9,078 — 2,808 4,179 29,873 $ 7,018 4,163 20,259 $ 667 2 32,791 2,876 36,336 112 The difference between the total expected tax expense (computed by applying the U.S. Federal tax rate of 21% to pretax income in 2019 and 2018 and 35% in 2017) and the reported income tax provision relating to income before income taxes is as follows: For the Year Ended December 31, 2018 2017 2019 $ 27,008 $ 18,381 $ 27,720 (In thousands) Tax rate applied to income before income taxes Increase (decrease) resulting from the effects of: Tax law change Nondeductible acquisition costs Tax exempt interest on loans, obligations of states and political subdivisions and bank owned life insurance State income taxes Tax credit investments Stock compensation Other Federal tax provision State tax provision Total income tax provision — 125 (1,282) (1,283) (72) (698) (36) 23,762 6,111 29,873 $ — 207 (667) (874) (33) (918) — 16,096 4,163 20,259 $ $ The net deferred tax assets (liabilities) are comprised of the following as of: (In thousands) Allowance for loan losses Premises and equipment Other real estate owned Accrued stock compensation Federal tax loss carryforward State tax loss carryforward Alternative minimum tax credit carryforward Lease liabilities Net unrealized securities losses Deferred compensation Accrued interest and fee income Other Gross deferred tax assets Less: Valuation allowance Deferred tax assets net of valuation allowance Core deposit base intangible Net unrealized securities gains Premises and equipment Right of use assets Other Gross deferred tax liabilities Net deferred tax assets December 31, 2019 2018 $ $ $ 8,949 — 8 2,406 3,601 1,110 530 7,381 — 2,458 3,106 378 29,927 — 29,927 (4,005) (1,210) (114) (6,416) (1,725) (13,470) 16,457 $ 8,552 657 (1,445) (1,007) (165) (1,027) 173 33,458 2,878 36,336 8,592 1,670 207 2,547 4,699 2,912 — — 4,658 2,287 7,674 1,627 36,873 — 36,873 (5,706) — — — (2,213) (7,919) 28,954 Included in the table above is the effect of temporary differences associated with the Company's investments in debt securities accounted for under ASC Topic 320, for which no deferred tax expense or benefit was recognized. These items are recorded as Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in the shareholders' equity section of the consolidated balance sheet. In 2019, unrealized gains of $5.7 million resulted in a deferred tax liability of $1.2 million. In 2018, unrealized losses of $17.7 million resulted in a deferred tax asset of $4.7 million. 113 At December 31, 2019, the Company's net deferred tax assets ("DTAs") of $16.5 million consists of approximately $12.9 million of net U.S. federal DTAs and $3.5 million of net state DTAs. Management assesses the necessity of a valuation allowance recorded against DTAs at each reporting period. The determination of whether a valuation allowance for net DTAs is appropriate is subject to considerable judgment and requires an evaluation of all positive and negative evidence. Based on an assessment of all of the evidence, including favorable trending in asset quality and certainty regarding the amount of future taxable income that the Company forecasts, management concluded that it was more likely than not that its net DTAs will be realized based upon future taxable income. Management's confidence in the realization of projected future taxable income is based upon analysis of the Company's risk profile and its trending financial performance, including credit quality. The Company believes it can confidently and reasonably predict future results of operations that result in taxable income at sufficient levels over the future period of time that the Company has available to realize its net DTA. A valuation allowance could be required in future periods based on the assessment of positive and negative evidence. Management's conclusion at December 31, 2019 that it is more likely than not that the net DTAs of $16.5 million will be realized is based upon estimates of future taxable income that are supported by internal projections which consider historical performance, various internal estimates and assumptions, as well as certain external data, all of which management believes to be reasonable although inherently subject to judgment. If actual results differ significantly from the current estimates of future taxable income, even if caused by adverse macro-economic conditions, a valuation allowance may need to be recorded for some or all of the Company's DTAs. The establishment of a DTA valuation allowance could have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and results of operations. Management expects to realize the $16.5 million in net DTAs well in advance of the statutory carryforward period. At December 31, 2019, approximately $3.6 million of DTAs relate to federal net operating losses which will expire in annual installments beginning in 2029 through 2032. Additionally, $1.1 million of the DTAs relate to state net operating losses which will expire in annual installments beginning in 2029 through 2034. Remaining DTAs are not related to net operating losses or credits and therefore, have no expiration date. The Company recognizes interest and penalties, as appropriate, as part of the provisioning for income taxes. No interest or penalties were accrued at December 31, 2019. In accordance with ASC Topic 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation, the Company recognized $0.8 million, $1.1 million and $1.1 million in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively, of discrete tax benefits related to share-based compensation. In accordance with ASC Topic 323, Investments-Equity Method and Joint Ventures, amortization of the Company's low-income housing credit investment of $0.9 million, $1.0 million and $0.7 million has been reflected as income tax expense for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The amount of affordable housing tax credits, amortization and tax benefits recorded as income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2019 were $0.8 million, $0.9 million, and $0.2 million, respectively. The amount of affordable housing tax credits, amortization and tax benefits recorded as income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2018 were $0.8 million, $1.0 million and $0.2 million, respectively. The amount of affordable housing tax credits, amortization and tax benefits recorded as income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2017 were $0.6 million, $0.7 million and $0.3 million, respectively. The carrying value of the investment in affordable housing credits is $7.4 million and $8.3 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, of which $0.5 million and $3.2 million, respectively, is unfunded. The Company has no unrecognized income tax benefits or provisions due to uncertain income tax positions. The following are the major tax jurisdictions in which the Company operates and the earliest tax year, exclusive of the impact of the net operating loss carryforwards, subject to examination: Jurisdiction United States of America Florida Tax Year 2016 2016 Enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 ( the "Tax Reform Act") required the Company to revalue its existing net DTA based on the future federal corporate tax rate of 21%. The DTA revaluation resulted in a one-time charge to income tax expense in 2017 in the amount of $8.6 million. Upon the filing of the Company's 2017 income tax return, a $0.2 million tax benefit was recorded in 2018 to true-up the initial estimate. No further adjustments related to the Tax Reform Act are expected. In September 2019, the State of Florida announced a reduction in the corporate income tax rate from 5.5% to 4.458% for the years 2019, 2020 and 2021. This change resulted in additional income tax expense of $1.1 million upon the write down in the third 114 quarter of 2019 of deferred tax assets affected by the change, offset by a $0.4 million benefit upon adjusting the year-to-date provision to the new statutory tax rate. Note M - Noninterest Income and Expenses Details of noninterest income and expense are as follows: For the Year Ended December 31, 2018 2017 2019 $ $ $ 11,529 4,443 6,490 1,909 1,054 13,399 3,674 2,472 10,545 55,515 — 1,217 56,732 73,829 13,697 15,077 2,958 14,284 6,245 4,161 8,553 881 5,826 51 15,177 160,739 $ $ $ 11,198 4,183 4,682 1,732 1,398 12,335 4,291 2,474 8,352 50,645 — (623) 50,022 71,111 12,945 16,374 2,481 13,394 6,744 5,085 9,961 2,195 4,300 461 17,222 162,273 $ $ $ 10,049 3,705 6,449 1,352 910 10,583 3,426 579 6,177 43,230 15,153 86 58,469 65,692 11,732 14,116 2,291 13,290 6,067 4,784 11,022 2,326 3,361 (300) 15,535 149,916 (In thousands) Noninterest Income Service charges on deposit accounts Trust fees Mortgage banking fees Brokerage commissions and fees Marine finance fees Interchange income BOLI income SBA gains Other Gain on sale of Visa stock Securities gains (losses), net Total Noninterest Income Noninterest Expenses Salaries and wages Employee benefits Outsourced data processing costs Telephone and data lines Occupancy Furniture and equipment Marketing Legal and professional fees FDIC assessments Amortization of intangibles Foreclosed property expense and net loss (gain) on sale Other Total Noninterest Expenses 115 Note N - Shareholders' Equity Required Regulatory Capital The Company is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the Federal banking agencies. Failure to meet the minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possible additional discretionary actions by the regulators, which could have a direct material impact on the financial statements. These requirements involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items calculated pursuant to regulatory guidance. The Company's capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors. Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of total, Tier 1 capital and common equity Tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined) and of Tier 1 capital to average assets (as defined). At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company and Seacoast Bank, its wholly-owned banking subsidiary, were both considered "well capitalized" based on the applicable U.S. regulatory capital ratio requirements as reflected in the table below: (Dollars in thousands) Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida (Consolidated) At December 31, 2019: Minimum to meet "Well Capitalized" Requirements Minimum for Capital Adequacy Purpose1 Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Total Risk-Based Capital Ratio (to risk-weighted assets) $ 860,934 15.71% Tier 1 Capital Ratio (to risk-weighted assets) Common Equity Tier 1 Capital Ratio (to risk-weighted assets) Leverage Ratio (to adjusted average assets) 825,640 754,555 825,640 15.06 13.77 12.20 At December 31, 2018: Total Risk-Based Capital Ratio (to risk-weighted assets) $ 744,687 14.43% Tier 1 Capital Ratio (to risk-weighted assets) Common Equity Tier 1 Capital Ratio (to risk-weighted assets) Leverage Ratio (to adjusted average assets) 712,144 641,340 712,144 13.80 12.43 11.16 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a $ 438,506 8.00% n/a n/a n/a 328,880 246,660 270,788 6.00 4.50 4.00 n/a $ 412,754 8.00% n/a n/a n/a 309,566 232,174 255,167 6.00 4.50 4.00 Seacoast National Bank (A Wholly Owned Bank Subsidiary) At December 31, 2019: Total Risk-Based Capital Ratio (to risk-weighted assets) $ 804,058 14.68% $ 547,440 10.00% $ 437,952 8.00% Tier 1 Capital Ratio (to risk-weighted assets) Common Equity Tier 1 Capital Ratio (to risk-weighted assets) Leverage Ratio (to adjusted average assets) 768,764 768,764 768,764 14.04 14.04 11.38 437,952 355,836 337,787 8.00 6.50 5.00 328,464 246,348 270,230 6.00 4.50 4.00 At December 31, 2018: Total Risk-Based Capital Ratio (to risk-weighted assets) $ 701,093 13.60% $ 515,607 10.00% $ 412,486 8.00% Tier 1 Capital Ratio (to risk-weighted assets) Common Equity Tier 1 Capital Ratio (to risk-weighted assets) Leverage Ratio (to adjusted average assets) 668,550 668,550 668,550 12.97 12.97 10.49 412,486 335,145 318,795 8.00 6.50 5.00 309,364 232,023 255,036 6.00 4.50 4.00 1Excludes the Basel III capital conservation buffer of 2.5% for 2019 and 1.875% for 2018, which if not exceeded may constrain dividends, equity repurchases and compensation. n/a - not applicable The Company has reserved 300,000 common shares for issuance in connection with an employee stock purchase plan and 1,000,000 common shares for issuance in connection with an employee profit sharing plan. Holders of common stock are entitled to one vote per share on all matters presented to shareholders as provided in the Company’s Articles of Incorporation. The Company implemented a dividend reinvestment plan during 2007, issuing no shares from treasury stock under this plan during 2019 or 2018. 116 December 31, 2019 2018 $ 70 $ 197 52,979 40,130 1,005,756 897,683 1,515 777 $ 1,060,320 $ 938,787 $ 71,085 $ 3,700 985,535 $ 1,060,320 $ 70,804 3,716 864,267 938,787 Year Ended December 31, 2019 2018 2017 $ 679 $ 484 $ — — 679 3,368 651 — — 484 3,165 879 (3,340) (3,560) (702) (747) (2,638) 101,377 (2,813) 70,088 $ 98,739 $ 67,275 $ 2,104 — 15,153 17,257 2,499 649 14,109 4,938 9,171 33,694 42,865 Note O - Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida (Parent Company Only) Financial Information Balance Sheets (In thousands) Assets Cash Securities purchased under agreement to resell with subsidiary bank, maturing within 30 days Investment in subsidiaries Other assets Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity Subordinated debt Other liabilities Shareholders' equity Statements of Income (Loss) (In thousands) Income Interest/other Dividends from subsidiary Bank Gain on sale of Visa Class B stock Interest expense Other expenses (Loss) income before income taxes and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries Income tax (benefit) provision (Loss) Income before equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries Equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries Net income 117 Statements of Cash Flows (In thousands) Cash flows from operating activities Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: Net Income Equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries Gain on sale of Visa Class B stock Net (increase) decrease in other assets Net increase (decrease) in other liabilities Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities Cash flows from investing activities Net cash paid for bank acquisition Investment in unconsolidated subsidiary Purchase of Visa Class B stock Proceeds from sale of Visa Class B stock Dividends from bank subsidiary (Increase) decrease in securities purchased under agreement to resell, maturing within 30 days, net Year Ended December 31, 2019 2018 2017 $ $ 98,739 (101,377) — (738) 265 (3,111) $ 67,275 (70,088) — (10,045) (3,431) (16,289) — (10) — — 18,082 (12,849) (6,558) — — 21,333 — (421) (20,475) 42,865 (33,694) (15,153) 1,415 4,005 (562) (27,862) — (6,180) — — Net cash provided by (used in) investment activities 5,223 14,354 (54,517) Cash flows from financing activities Issuance of common stock, net of related expense Stock based employment benefit plans Net cash provided by financing activities Net change in cash Cash at beginning of year Cash at end of year Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: Cash paid during the period for interest — (2,239) (2,239) (127) 197 — 978 978 (957) 1,154 55,641 (56) 55,585 506 648 70 $ 197 $ 1,154 3,186 $ 2,936 $ 2,205 $ $ Note P - Contingent Liabilities and Commitments with Off-Balance Sheet Risk The Company and its subsidiaries, because of the nature of their business, are at all times subject to numerous legal actions, threatened or filed. Management presently believes that none of the legal proceedings to which it is a party are likely to have a materially adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial condition, or operating results or cash flows. The Company's subsidiary bank is party to financial instruments with off balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit, and limited partner equity commitments. The subsidiary bank’s exposure to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contract or notional amount of those instruments. The subsidiary bank uses the same credit policies in making commitments and standby letters of credit as they do for on balance sheet instruments. 118 Unfunded commitments for the Company as of: (In thousands) Contract or Notional Amount December 31, 2019 2018 Financial instruments whose contract amounts represent credit risk: Commitments to extend credit $ 1,018,020 $ 982,739 Standby letters of credit and financial guarantees written: Secured Unsecured Unfunded limited partner equity commitment 13,073 663 17,736 847 6,011 7,252 Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The subsidiary bank evaluates each customer's creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the bank upon extension of credit, is based on management's credit evaluation of the counterparty. Collateral held varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory, equipment, and commercial and residential real estate. Of the $1.0 billion in commitments to extend credit outstanding at December 31, 2019, $399.7 million is secured by 1-4 family residential properties for individuals with approximately $39.4 million at fixed interest rates ranging from 3.24% to 6.50%. Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the subsidiary bank to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. These instruments have fixed termination dates and most end without being drawn; therefore, they do not represent a significant liquidity risk. Those guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements, including commercial paper, bond financing, and similar transactions. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers. The subsidiary bank holds collateral supporting these commitments for which collateral is deemed necessary. Collateral held for secured standby letters of credit at December 31, 2019 and 2018 totaled $13.2 million and $19.1 million, respectively. Unfunded limited partner equity commitments at December 31, 2019 totaled $6.0 million that the Company has committed to small business investment companies under the SBIC Act to be used to provide capital to small businesses and entities that provide low income housing tax credits. 119 Note Q - Fair Value Under ASC Topic 820, fair value measurements for items measured at fair value on a recurring and nonrecurring basis at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 included: (In thousands) At December 31, 2019 Available-for-sale debt securities1 Loans held for sale2 Loans3 Other real estate owned4 Equity securities5 Fair Value Measurements Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets Level 1 Significant Other Observable Inputs Level 2 Significant Other Unobservable Inputs Level 3 $ 946,855 $ 100 $ 946,755 $ 20,029 5,123 12,390 6,392 — — — 6,392 20,029 1,419 241 — — — 3,704 12,149 — $ $ $ 100 11,873 865,831 At December 31, 2018 Available-for-sale debt securities1 Loans held for sale2 Loans3 Other real estate owned4 Equity securities5 1See Note D for further detail of fair value of individual investment categories. 2Recurring fair value basis determined using observable market data. 3See Note E. Nonrecurring fair value adjustments to loans identified as impaired reflect full or partial write- downs that are based on the loan’s observable market price or current appraised value of the collateral in accordance with ASC Topic 310. 4Fair value is measured on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with ASC Topic 360. 5An investment in shares of a mutual fund that invests primarily in CRA-qualified debt securities, reported at fair value in Other Assets. Recurring fair value basis is determined using market quotations. 865,731 12,802 11,873 12,505 2,290 8,590 6,205 6,205 6,300 297 — — — — — — — $ Loans held for sale: Fair values are based upon estimated values to be received from independent third party purchasers. These loans are intended for sale and the Company believes the fair value is the best indicator of the resolution of these loans. Fair market value changes occur due to changes in interest rates, the borrower’s credit, the secondary loan market and the market for a borrower’s debt. Interest income is recorded based on contractual terms of the loan in accordance with Company policy on loans held for investment. None of the loans are 90 days or more past due or on nonaccrual as of December 31, 2019 and 2018. The aggregate fair value and contractual balance of loans held for sale as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 is as follows: (In thousands) Aggregate fair value Contractual balance Excess December 31, 2019 2018 $ $ 20,029 19,445 584 11,873 11,562 311 Loans: Level 2 loans consist of impaired real estate loans which are collateral dependent. Fair value is based on recent real estate appraisals less estimated costs of sale. For residential real estate impaired loans, appraised values or internal evaluation are based on the comparative sales approach. Level 3 loans consist of commercial and commercial real estate impaired loans. For these loans evaluations may use either a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches, such as comparative sales, cost and/or income approach. A significant unobservable input in the income approach is the estimated capitalization rate for a given piece of collateral. At December 31, 2019 the range of capitalization rates utilized to determine fair value of the underlying collateral averaged approximately 7.4%. Adjustments to comparable sales may be made by an appraiser to reflect local market conditions or other economic factors and may result in changes in the fair value of an asset over time. As such, the fair value of these impaired loans is considered level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. Impaired loans measured at fair value totaled $5.1 million with a specific reserve of $2.9 million at December 31, 2019, compared to $8.6 million with a specific reserve of $2.7 million at December 31, 2018. 120 For loans classified as level 3, the changes included loans migrating to OREO of $4.7 million and paydowns and chargeoffs of $1.9 million, offset by additions of $4.0 million during the twelve months ended December 31, 2019. Other real estate owned: When appraisals are used to determine fair value and the appraisals are based on a market approach, the fair value of other real estate owned ("OREO") is classified as level 2. When the fair value of OREO is based on appraisals which require significant adjustments to market-based valuation inputs or apply an income approach based on unobservable cash flows, the fair value of OREO is classified as Level 3. For OREO classified as level 3 during the twelve months ended December 31, 2019, changes included addition of foreclosed loans of $5.5 million, offset by reductions primarily consisting of sales of $5.5 million and writedowns of $0.4 million. Transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy are recognized on the actual date of the event or circumstances that caused the transfer, which generally coincides with the Company's monthly and/or quarter valuation process. There were no such transfers during the twelve months ended December 31, 2019 and 2018. The carrying amount and fair value of the Company's other significant financial instruments that were not disclosed previously in the balance sheet and for which carrying amount is not fair value as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 is as follows: (In thousands) At December 31, 2019 Financial Assets Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets Level 1 Significant Other Observable Inputs Level 2 Significant Other Unobservable Inputs Level 3 Carrying Amount Debt securities held-to-maturity1 $ 261,369 $ — $ 262,213 $ Time deposits with other banks Loans, net Financial Liabilities Deposits Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) borrowings Subordinated debt At December 31, 2018 Financial Assets 3,742 5,158,127 5,584,753 315,000 71,085 — — — — — — — — — 64,017 Debt securities held-to-maturity1 $ 357,949 $ — $ 349,895 $ Time deposits with other banks Loans, net Financial Liabilities Deposits Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) borrowings Subordinated debt 8,243 4,784,201 5,177,240 380,000 70,804 1See Note D for further detail of recurring fair value basis of individual investment categories. — — — — — — — — — 61,224 — 3,744 5,139,491 5,584,621 314,995 — — 8,132 4,835,248 5,172,098 380,027 — The short maturity of Seacoast’s assets and liabilities results in having a significant number of financial instruments whose fair value equals or closely approximates carrying value. Such financial instruments are reported in the following balance sheet captions: cash and due from banks, interest bearing deposits with other banks, FHLB borrowings and securities sold under agreement to repurchase. The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instrument for which it is practicable to estimate that value at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018: Debt securities: U.S. Treasury securities are reported at fair value utilizing Level 1 inputs. Other securities are reported at fair value utilizing Level 2 inputs. The estimated fair value of a security is determined based on market quotations when available or, 121 if not available, by using quoted market prices for similar securities, pricing models or discounted cash flow analyses, using observable market data where available. The Company reviews the prices supplied by independent pricing services, as well as their underlying pricing methodologies, for reasonableness and to ensure such prices are aligned with traditional pricing matrices. The fair value of collateralized loan obligations is determined from broker quotes. From time to time, the Company will validate, on a sample basis, prices supplied by the independent pricing service by comparison to prices obtained from other brokers and third-party sources or derived using internal models. Loans: Fair values are estimated for portfolios of loans with similar financial characteristics. Loans are segregated by type such as commercial, mortgage, etc. Each loan category is further segmented into fixed and adjustable rate interest terms and by performing and nonperforming categories. The fair value of loans is calculated by discounting scheduled cash flows through the estimated life including prepayment considerations, using estimated market discount rates that reflect the risks inherent in the loan. The fair value approach considers market-driven variables including credit related factors and reflects an "exit price" as defined in ASC Topic 820. Deposit Liabilities: The fair value of demand deposits, savings accounts and money market deposits is the amount payable at the reporting date. The fair value of fixed maturity certificates of deposit is estimated using the rates currently offered for funding of similar remaining maturities. Note R - Earnings Per Share Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the year. In 2019, 2018, and 2017, options to purchase 491,000, 483,000, and 274,000 shares, respectively, were antidilutive and accordingly were excluded in determining diluted earnings per share. (In thousands, except per share data) Basic earnings per share Net Income Total weighted average common stock outstanding Net income per share Diluted earnings per share Net Income For the Year Ended December 31 2017 2018 2019 98,739 51,449 1.92 $ $ 67,275 47,969 1.40 $ $ 42,865 42,613 1.01 98,739 $ 67,275 $ 42,865 $ $ $ Total weighted average common stock outstanding 51,449 47,969 42,613 Add: Dilutive effect of employee restricted stock and stock options (See Note J) Total weighted average diluted stock outstanding Net income per share 580 779 52,029 48,748 $ 1.90 $ 1.38 $ 737 43,350 0.99 Note S - Business Combinations Acquisition of GulfShore Bancshares, Inc. On April 7, 2017, the Company completed its acquisition of GulfShore Bancshares, Inc. ("GulfShore"), the parent company of GulfShore Bank. Simultaneously, upon completion of the merger, GulfShore’s wholly owned subsidiary bank, GulfShore Bank, was merged with and into Seacoast Bank. GulfShore, headquartered in Tampa, Florida, operated 3 branches in Tampa and St. Petersburg. This acquisition added $357.6 million in total assets, $250.9 million in loans and $285.4 million in deposits to Seacoast. 122 As a result of this acquisition the Company enhanced its presence in the Tampa, Florida market, expanded its customer base and leveraged operating cost through economies of scale, and positively affected the Company’s operating results to the extent the Company earns more from interest earning assets than it pays in interest on its interest bearing liabilities. The Company acquired 100% of the outstanding common stock of GulfShore. Under the terms of the definitive agreement, GulfShore shareholders received, for each share of GulfShore common stock, the combination of $1.47 in cash and 0.4807 shares of Seacoast common stock (based on Seacoast’s closing price of $23.94 per share on April 7, 2017). (In thousands, except per share data) Shares exchanged for cash Number of GulfShore Bancshares, Inc. common shares outstanding Per share exchange ratio Number of shares of common stock issued Multiplied by common stock price per share on April 7, 2017 Value of common stock issued Total purchase price April 7, 2017 8,034 5,464 0.4807 2,627 23.94 62,883 70,917 $ $ $ The acquisition was accounted for under the acquisition method in accordance with ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations. The Company recognized goodwill of $37.1 million for this acquisition that is nondeductible for tax purposes. Determining fair values of assets and liabilities, especially the loan portfolio, core deposit intangibles, and deferred taxes, is a complicated process involving significant judgment regarding methods and assumptions used to calculate estimated fair values. (In thousands) Assets: Cash Time deposits with other banks Investment securities Loans, net Fixed assets Other real estate owned Core deposit intangibles Goodwill Other assets Total assets Liabilities: Deposits Other liabilities Total liabilities April 7, 2017 38,267 17,273 316 250,876 1,307 13 3,927 37,098 8,572 357,649 285,350 1,382 286,732 $ $ $ $ 123 The table below presents information with respect to the fair value of acquired loans, as well as their unpaid principal balance (“Book Balance”) at acquisition date. (In thousands) Loans: Single family residential real estate Commercial real estate Construction/development/land Commercial loans Consumer and other loans Purchased credit-impaired Total acquired loans April 7, 2017 Book Balance Fair Value $ $ 101,281 $ 106,729 13,175 32,137 3,554 — 99,598 103,905 11,653 32,247 3,473 — 256,876 $ 250,876 No loans acquired were specifically identified with credit deficiency factor(s), pursuant to ASC Topic 310-30. The factors we considered to identify loans as PCI loans were all acquired loans that were nonaccrual, 60 days or more past due, designated as TDR, graded “special mention” or “substandard.” Loans without specifically identified credit deficiency factors are referred to as PULs for disclosure purposes. These loans were then evaluated to determine estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. Although no specific credit deficiencies were identifiable, we believe there is an element of risk as to whether all contractual cash flows will be eventually received. Factors that were considered included the economic environment both nationally and locally as well as the real estate market particularly in Florida. We have applied ASC Topic 310-20 accounting treatment to the PULs. The Company believes the deposits assumed from the acquisition have an intangible value. In determining the valuation amount, deposits were analyzed based on factors such as type of deposit, deposit retention, interest rates and age of deposit relationships. Acquisition of NorthStar Banking Corporation On October 20, 2017, the Company completed its acquisition of NorthStar Banking Corporation (“NorthStar”). Simultaneously, upon completion of the merger of NorthStar with and into the Company, NorthStar’s wholly owned subsidiary bank, NorthStar Bank, was merged with and into Seacoast Bank. NorthStar, headquartered in Tampa, Florida, operated three branches in Tampa, of which all have been retained as Seacoast locations. This acquisition added $216.3 million in total assets, $136.8 million in loans and $182.4 million in deposits to Seacoast. As a result of this acquisition the Company enhanced its presence in the Tampa, Florida market, expanded its customer base and leveraged operating cost through economies of scale, and positively affected the Company’s operating results to the extent the Company earns more from interest earning assets than it pays in interest on its interest bearing liabilities. The Company acquired 100% of the outstanding common stock of NorthStar. Under the terms of the definitive agreement, NorthStar shareholders received, for each share of NorthStar common stock, the combination of $2.40 in cash and 0.5605 shares of Seacoast common stock (based on Seacoast’s closing price of $24.92 per share on October 20, 2017). (In thousands, except per share data) Shares exchanged for cash Number of NorthStar Banking Corporation common shares outstanding Per share exchange ratio Number of shares of common stock issued Multiplied by common stock price per share on October 20, 2017 Value of common stock issued Cash paid for NorthStar Banking Corporation vested stock options Total purchase price 124 October 20, 2017 $ $ $ 4,701 1,958 0.5605 1,098 24.92 27,353 801 32,855 The acquisition was accounted for under the acquisition method in accordance with ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations. The Company recognized goodwill of $12.3 million for this acquisition that is nondeductible for tax purposes. Determining fair values of assets and liabilities, especially the loan portfolio core deposit intangibles, and deferred taxes, is a complicated process involving significant judgment regarding methods and assumptions used to calculate estimated fair values. The adjustments reflected in the table below are the result of information obtained subsequent to the initial measurement. (In thousands) Assets: Cash Investment securities Loans, net Fixed assets Core deposit intangibles Goodwill Other assets Total assets Liabilities: Deposits Other liabilities Total liabilities Initially Measured October 20, 2017 Measurement Period Adjustments As Adjusted October 20, 2017 $ $ $ $ 5,485 $ — $ 56,123 136,832 2,637 1,275 12,404 1,522 — — — — (99) 99 216,278 $ — $ 182,443 980 183,423 $ $ — $ — — $ 5,485 56,123 136,832 2,637 1,275 12,305 1,621 216,278 182,443 980 183,423 The table below presents information with respect to the fair value of acquired loans, as well as their unpaid principal balance (“Book Balance”) at acquisition date. (In thousands) Loans: Single family residential real estate Commercial real estate Construction/development/land Commercial loans Consumer and other loans Purchased credit-impaired Total acquired loans October 20, 2017 Book Balance Fair Value $ $ 15,111 $ 73,139 11,706 31,200 6,761 5,527 15,096 69,554 10,390 30,854 6,645 4,293 143,444 $ 136,832 For the loans acquired we first segregated all acquired loans with specifically identified credit deficiency factor(s). The factors we considered to identify loans as PCI loans were all acquired loans that were nonaccrual, 60 days or more past due, designated as TDR, graded “special mention” or “substandard.” These loans were then evaluated to determine estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. As required by generally accepted accounting principles, we are accounting for these loans pursuant to ASC Topic 310-30. The table below summarizes the total contractually required principal and interest cash payments, management’s estimate of expected total cash payments and fair value of the loans as of October 20, 2017 for purchased credit-impaired loans. Contractually required principal and interest payments have been adjusted for estimated prepayments. 125 (In thousands) Contractually required principal and interest Non-accretable difference Cash flows expected to be collected Accretable yield Total purchased credit-impaired loans acquired October 20, 2017 $ $ 5,596 (689) 4,907 (614) 4,293 Loans without specifically identified credit deficiency factors are referred to as PULs for disclosure purposes. These loans were then evaluated to determine estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. Although no specific credit deficiencies were identifiable, we believe there is an element of risk as to whether all contractual cash flows will be eventually received. Factors that were considered included the economic environment both nationally and locally as well as the real estate market particularly in Florida. We have applied ASC Topic 310-20 accounting treatment to the PULs. The Company believes the deposits assumed from the acquisition have an intangible value. In determining the valuation amount, deposits were analyzed based on factors such as type of deposit, deposit retention, interest rates and age of deposit relationships. Acquisition of Palm Beach Community Bank On November 3, 2017, the Company completed its acquisition of Palm Beach Community Bank (“PBCB”). PBCB was merged with and into Seacoast Bank. This acquisition added $357.0 million in total assets, $270.3 million in loans and $268.6 million in deposits to Seacoast. PBCB, headquartered in West Palm Beach, Florida, operated four branches in West Palm Beach. As a result of this acquisition the Company enhanced its presence in the Palm Beach, Florida market, expanded its customer base and leveraged operating cost through economies of scale, and positively affected the Company’s operating results to the extent the Company earns more from interest earning assets than it pays in interest on its interest bearing liabilities. The Company acquired 100% of the outstanding common stock of PBCB. Under the terms of the definitive agreement, PBCB shareholders received, for each share of PBCB common stock, the combination of $6.26 in cash and 0.9240 shares of Seacoast common stock (based on Seacoast’s closing price of $24.31 per share on November 3, 2017). (In thousands, except per share data) Shares exchanged for cash Number of Palm Beach Community Bank common shares outstanding Per share exchange ratio Number of shares of common stock issued Multiplied by common stock price per share on November 3, 2017 Value of common stock issued Total purchase price November 3, 2017 $ $ $ 15,694 2,507 0.9240 2,316 24.31 56,312 72,006 The acquisition was accounted for under the acquisition method in accordance with ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations. The Company recognized goodwill of $34.5 million for this acquisition that is nondeductible for tax purposes. Determining fair values of assets and liabilities, especially the loan portfolio, core deposit intangibles, and deferred taxes, is a complicated process involving significant judgment regarding methods and assumptions used to calculate estimated fair values. The adjustments reflected in the table below are the result of information obtained subsequent to the initial measurement. 126 (In thousands) Assets: Cash Investment securities Loans, net Fixed assets Core deposit intangibles Goodwill Other assets Total assets Liabilities: Deposits Other liabilities Total liabilities Initially Measured November 3, 2017 Measurement Period Adjustments As Adjusted November 3, 2017 $ $ $ $ 9,301 $ — $ 22,098 272,090 7,641 2,523 33,428 9,909 — (1,772) — — 1,076 696 356,990 $ — $ 268,633 16,351 284,984 $ $ — $ — — $ 9,301 22,098 270,318 7,641 2,523 34,504 10,605 356,990 268,633 16,351 284,984 The table below presents information with respect to the fair value of acquired loans, as well as their unpaid principal balance ("Book Balance") at acquisition date. (In thousands) Loans: Single family residential real estate Commercial real estate Construction/development/land Commercial loans Consumer and other loans Purchased credit-impaired Total acquired loans November 3, 2017 Book Balance Fair Value $ $ 30,153 $ 134,705 69,686 36,076 179 4,768 275,567 $ 30,990 132,089 67,425 35,876 172 3,766 270,318 For the loans acquired we first segregated all acquired loans with specifically identified credit deficiency factor(s). The factors we considered to identify loans as PCI loans were all acquired loans that were nonaccrual, 60 days or more past due, designated as TDR, graded “special mention” or “substandard.” These loans were then evaluated to determine estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. As required by generally accepted accounting principles, we are accounting for these loans pursuant to ASC Topic 310-30. The table below summarizes the total contractually required principal and interest cash payments, management’s estimate of expected total cash payments and fair value of the loans as of November 3, 2017 for purchased credit-impaired loans. Contractually required principal and interest payments have been adjusted for estimated prepayments. (In thousands) Contractually required principal and interest Non-accretable difference Cash flows expected to be collected Accretable yield Total purchased credit-impaired loans acquired November 3, 2017 $ $ 4,768 (1,002) 3,766 — 3,766 Loans without specifically identified credit deficiency factors are referred to as PULs for disclosure purposes. These loans were then evaluated to determine estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. Although no specific credit deficiencies were identifiable, we believe there is an element of risk as to whether all contractual cash flows will be eventually received. Factors that were 127 considered included the economic environment both nationally and locally as well as the real estate market particularly in Florida. We have applied ASC Topic 310-20 accounting treatment to the PULs. The Company believes the deposits assumed from the acquisition have an intangible value. In determining the valuation amount, deposits were analyzed based on factors such as type of deposit, deposit retention, interest rates and age of deposit relationships. Acquisition of First Green Bancorp, Inc. On October 19, 2018, the Company completed its acquisition of First Green Bancorp, Inc ("First Green"). Simultaneously, upon completion of the merger of First Green and the Company, First Green's wholly owned subsidiary bank, First Green Bank, was merged with and into Seacoast Bank. Prior to the acquisition, First Green operated seven branches in the Orlando, Daytona, and Fort Lauderdale markets. As a result of this acquisition, the Company enhanced its presence in the Orlando, Daytona and Fort Lauderdale, Florida markets, expanded its customer base and leverage operating cost through economies of scale, and positively affected the Company’s operating results to the extent the Company earns more from interest earning assets than it pays in interest on its interest bearing liabilities. The Company acquired 100% of the outstanding common stock of First Green. Under the terms of the definitive agreement, each share of First Green common stock was converted into the right to receive 0.7324 shares of Seacoast common stock. (In thousands, except per share data) Number of First Green common shares outstanding Per share exchange ratio Number of shares of common stock issued Multiplied by common stock price per share on October 19, 2018 Value of common stock issued Cash paid for First Green vested stock options Total purchase price October 19, 2018 5,462 0.7324 4,000 26.87 107,486 6,558 114,044 $ $ The acquisition of First Green was accounted for under the acquisition method in accordance with ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations. The Company recognized goodwill of $56.7 million for this acquisition that is nondeductible for tax purposes. Determining fair values of assets and liabilities, especially the loan portfolio, core deposit intangibles, and deferred taxes, is a complicated process involving significant judgment regarding methods and assumptions used to calculate estimated fair values. The adjustments reflected in the table below are the result of information obtained subsequent to the initial measurement. (In thousands) Assets: Cash Investment securities Loans, net Fixed assets Other real estate owned Core deposit intangibles Goodwill Other assets Total assets Liabilities: Deposits Other liabilities Total liabilities Initially Measured October 19, 2018 Measurement Period Adjustments As Adjusted October 19, 2018 29,434 32,145 631,497 16,828 410 10,170 56,198 40,669 817,351 624,289 79,018 703,307 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 128 — $ — — — — (676) 533 178 35 $ — $ 35 35 $ 29,434 32,145 631,497 16,828 410 9,494 56,731 40,847 817,386 624,289 79,053 703,342 The table below presents information with respect to the fair value of acquired loans, as well as their unpaid principal balance (“Book Balance”) at acquisition date. (In thousands) Loans: Single family residential real estate Commercial real estate Construction/development/land Commercial loans Consumer and other loans Purchased credit-impaired Total acquired loans October 19, 2018 Book Balance Fair Value $ $ 101,674 $ 437,767 61,195 56,288 9,156 2,136 101,119 406,613 58,385 54,973 8,942 1,465 668,216 $ 631,497 For the loans acquired we first segregated all acquired loans with specifically identified credit deficiency factor(s). The factors we considered to identify loans as PCI loans were all acquired loans that were nonaccrual, 60 days or more past due, designated as TDR, graded “special mention” or “substandard.” These loans were then evaluated to determine estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. As required by generally accepted accounting principles, we are accounting for these loans pursuant to ASC Topic 310-30. The table below summarizes the total contractually required principal and interest cash payments, management’s estimate of expected total cash payments and fair value of the loans as of October 19, 2018 for purchased credit-impaired loans. Contractually required principal and interest payments have been adjusted for estimated prepayments. (In thousands) Contractually required principal and interest Non-accretable difference Cash flows expected to be collected Accretable yield Total purchased credit-impaired loans acquired October 19, 2018 $ $ 2,136 (671) 1,465 — 1,465 Loans without specifically identified credit deficiency factors are referred to as PULs for disclosure purposes. These loans were then evaluated to determine estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. Although no specific credit deficiencies were identifiable, we believe there is an element of risk as to whether all contractual cash flows will be eventually received. Factors that were considered included the economic environment both nationally and locally as well as the real estate market particularly in Florida. We have applied ASC Topic 310-20 accounting treatment to the PULs. The Company believes the deposits assumed from the acquisition have an intangible value. In determining the valuation amount, deposits were analyzed based on factors such as type of deposit, deposit retention, interest rates and age of deposit relationships. Acquisition Costs Acquisition costs included in the Company’s income statement for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 are $1.0 million, $9.7 million, and $12.9 million, respectively. Pro-Forma Information Pro-forma data as of 2018 and 2017 present information as if the acquisitions of GulfShore, NorthStar, PBCB, and First Green occurred at the beginning of 2017: 129 (In thousands, except per share data) Net interest income Net income available to common shareholders EPS - basic EPS - diluted Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2018 2017 $ $ $ 238,498 82,307 1.61 1.58 $ $ $ 223,508 62,188 1.24 1.22 Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure None. Item 9A. Controls and Procedures (a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Company's Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in SEC Rule 13a-15 under the Exchange Act, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. In connection with the preparation of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, as of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was performed, with the participation of the CEO and CFO, of the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures, as required by Rule 13a-15 of the Exchange Act. Based upon that evaluation, the CEO and CFO concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report. (b) Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Company. Our internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to management and the board of directors regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes. Management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019. This assessment was based on the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control—Integrated Framework 2013. Based on this assessment, management believes that, as of December 31, 2019, the Company's internal control over financial reporting was effective. The Company's independent registered public accounting firm, Crowe LLP, has issued an audit report on our internal control over financial reporting which is included herein. (c) Change in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting During the three months ended December 31, 2019, there were no changes in the internal control over financial reporting that occurred or that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the internal control over financial reporting. Item 9B. Other Information. None. 130 Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance Part III Information concerning our directors and executive officers is set forth under the headings “Proposal 1 - Election of Directors,” “Corporate Governance,” “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” and “Certain Transactions and Business Relationships” in the 2020 Proxy Statement, incorporated herein by reference. Item 11. Executive Compensation Information regarding the compensation paid by us to our directors and executive officers is set forth under the headings “Executive Compensation”, “Compensation Discussion & Analysis”, “Compensation and Governance Committee Report” and “2019 Director Compensation” in the 2020 Proxy Statement which are incorporated herein by reference. Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters The following table sets forth information about the Company's common stock that may be issued under all of its existing compensation plans as of December 31, 2019. Equity Compensation Plan Information (a) Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities represented in column (a)) 903,779 $ — 22.00 — 1,056,520 53,114 Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders: Plan Category 2013 Plan1 Employee Stock Purchase Plan2 TOTAL 1,109,634 1Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan. Shares reserved under this plan are available for issuance pursuant to the exercise of stock options and stock appreciation rights granted under the plan, and may be granted as awards of restricted stock, performance shares, or other stock- based awards, prospectively. 2Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended. 903,779 22.00 $ Additional information regarding the ownership of the Company's common stock is set forth under the headings “Proposal 1 - Election of Directors” and “Director, Executive Officers and Certain Beneficial Stock Ownership” in the 2020 Proxy Statement, and is incorporated herein by reference. Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence Information regarding certain relationships and transactions between the Company and its officers, directors and significant shareholders is set forth under the heading “Certain Transactions and Business Relationships” and “Corporate Governance” in the 2020 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference. 131 Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services Information concerning the Company's principal accounting fees and services is set forth under the heading “Relationship with Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm; Audit and Non- Audit Fees” in the 2020 Proxy Statement, and is incorporated herein by reference. Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules Part IV (a)(1) The Consolidated Financial Statements and the report of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm thereon listed in Item 8 are set forth commencing on page 77. (a)(2) List of financial statement schedules All schedules normally required by Form 10-K are omitted, since either they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the financial statements or the notes thereto. (a)(3) Listing of exhibits PLEASE NOTE: It is inappropriate for readers to assume the accuracy of, or rely upon any covenants, representations or warranties that may be contained in agreements or other documents filed as Exhibits to, or incorporated by reference in, this report. Any such covenants, representations or warranties may have been qualified or superseded by disclosures contained in separate schedules or exhibits not filed with or incorporated by reference in this report, may reflect the parties’ negotiated risk allocation in the particular transaction, may be qualified by materiality standards that differ from those applicable for securities law purposes, may not be true as of the date of this report or any other date, and may be subject to waivers by any or all of the parties. Where exhibits and schedules to agreements filed or incorporated by reference as Exhibits hereto are not included in these Exhibits, such exhibits and schedules to agreements are not included or incorporated by reference herein. The following Exhibits are attached hereto or incorporated by reference herein (unless indicated otherwise, all documents referenced below were filed pursuant to the Exchange Act by Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida, Commission File No. 0-13660): Exhibit 2.1 Agreement and Plan of Merger Dated November 3, 2016, by and among the Company, Seacoast Bank, GulfShore, Bancshares, Inc. and GulfShore Bank, incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed November 9, 2016. Exhibit 2.2 Agreement and Plan of Merger Dated May 4, 2017, by and among the Company, Seacoast Bank, Palm Beach Community Bank, incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed May 9, 2017. Exhibit 2.3 Agreement and Plan of Merger Dated May 8, 2017, by and among the Company, Seacoast Bank, and NorthStar Banking Corporation and NorthStar Bank incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed May 24, 2017. Exhibit 2.4 Agreement and Plan of Merger Dated June 11, 2018 by and among the Company, Seacoast Bank, First Green Bancorp, Inc. and First Green Bank incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed June 15, 2018. Exhibit 2.5 Agreement and Plan of Merger Dated November 19, 2019 by and among the Company, Seacoast Bank and First Bank of the Palm Beaches incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed November 22, 2019. Exhibit 2.6 Agreement and Plan of Merger Dated January 23, 2020 by and among the Company, Seacoast Bank, Fourth Street Banking Company and Freedom Bank incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed January 29, 2020. 132 Exhibit 3.1.1 Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed May 10, 2006. Exhibit 3.1.2 Articles of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed December 23, 2008. Exhibit 3.1.3 Articles of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.4 to the Company’s Form S-1, filed June 22, 2009. Exhibit 3.1.4 Articles of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed July 20, 2009. Exhibit 3.1.5 Articles of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed December 3, 2009. Exhibit 3.1.6 Articles of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K/A, filed July 14, 2010. Exhibit 3.1.7 Articles of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed June 25, 2010. Exhibit 3.1.8 Articles of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed June 1, 2011. Exhibit 3.1.9 Articles of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed December 13, 2013. Exhibit 3.1.10 Articles of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed May 30, 2018. Exhibit 3.2 Amended and Restated By-laws of the Company Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed December 21, 2007. Exhibit 4.1 Description of Securities Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 10-K, filed on February 27, 2020. Exhibit 4.2 Specimen Common Stock Certificate Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 10-K, filed on March 17, 2014. Exhibit 4.3 Junior Subordinated Indenture Dated as of March 31, 2005, between the Company and Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee (including the form of the Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Note, which appears in Section 2.1 thereof), incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed April 5, 2005. Exhibit 4.4 Guarantee Agreement Dated as of March 31, 2005 between the Company, as Guarantor, and Wilmington Trust Company, as Guarantee Trustee, incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed April 5, 2005. Exhibit 4.5 Amended and Restated Trust Agreement Dated as of March 31, 2005, among the Company, as Depositor, Wilmington Trust Company, as Property Trustee, Wilmington Trust Company, as Delaware Trustee and the Administrative Trustees named therein, as Administrative Trustees (including exhibits containing the related forms of the SBCF Capital Trust I Common Securities Certificate and the Preferred Securities Certificate), incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed April 5, 2005. Exhibit 4.6 Indenture Dated as of December 16, 2005, between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (including the form of the Junior Subordinated Debt Security, which appears as Exhibit A to the Indenture), incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed December 21, 2005. 133 Exhibit 4.7 Guarantee Agreement Dated as of December 16, 2005, between the Company, as Guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Guarantee Trustee, incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed December 21, 2005. Exhibit 4.8 Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust Dated as of December 16, 2005, among the Company, as Sponsor, Dennis S. Hudson, III and William R. Hahl, as Administrators, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Institutional Trustee (including exhibits containing the related forms of the SBCF Statutory Trust II Common Securities Certificate and the Capital Securities Certificate), incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed December 21, 2005. Exhibit 4.9 Indenture Dated June 29, 2007, between the Company and LaSalle Bank, as Trustee (including the form of the Junior Subordinated Debt Security, which appears as Exhibit A to the Indenture), incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed July 3, 2007. Exhibit 4.10 Guarantee Agreement Dated June 29, 2007, between the Company, as Guarantor, and LaSalle Bank, as Guarantee Trustee, incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed July 3, 2007. Exhibit 4.11 Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust Dated June 29, 2007, among the Company, as Sponsor, Dennis S. Hudson, III and William R. Hahl, as Administrators, and LaSalle Bank, as Institutional Trustee (including exhibits containing the related forms of the SBCF Statutory Trust III Common Securities Certificate and the Capital Securities Certificate), incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed July 3, 2007. Exhibit 10.1 Amended and Restated Retirement Savings Plan* Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 15, 2011. Exhibit 10.2 Amended and Restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan* Incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement on DEF 14A, filed with the Commission on April 27, 2009. Exhibit 10.3 Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form S-3 File No. 333-221822, filed on November 30, 2017. Exhibit 10.4 Executive Deferred Compensation Plan* Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.12 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 30, 2001. Exhibit 10.5 Amended and Restated Directors Deferred Compensation Plan* Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.7 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 14, 2016. Exhibit 10.6 2013 Incentive Plan Incorporated herein by reference from Appendix A to the Company’s Proxy Statement on Form DEF 14A, filed April 9, 2013. Exhibit 10.7 Form of Change of Control Employment Agreement with Charles Cross, David Houdeshell and Charles Shaffer* Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed November 3, 2014. Exhibit 10.8 Employment Agreement* Dated December 18, 2014 between Dennis S. Hudson, III and the Company, incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed December 19, 2014. Exhibit 10.9 Amendment to Employment Agreement with Dennis S. Hudson, III Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed June 27, 2017. 134 Exhibit 10.10 Form of Change of Control Employment Agreement with Charles Cross, David Houdeshell and Charles Shaffer Incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed September 23, 2016. Exhibit 21 Subsidiaries of Registrant Exhibit 23.1 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Exhibit 31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Exhibit 31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Exhibit 32.1** Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Section 111 the Emergency Economic Stability Act, as amended Exhibit 32.2** Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Section 111 the Emergency Economic Stability Act, as amended Exhibit 101 The following materials from Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 formatted in Inline XBRL: (i) the Consolidated Statements of Income, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, (v) the Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity and (vi) the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text and including detailed tags. Exhibit 104 The cover page from the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, formatted in Inline XBRL. * Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. ** The certifications attached as Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2 accompany this Annual Report on Form 10-K and are “furnished” to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act. (b) Exhibits The response to this portion of Item 15 is submitted under item (a)(3) above. (c) Financial Statement Schedules None. Item 16. Form 10-K Summary Not applicable. 135 Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. SIGNATURES SEACOAST BANKING CORPORATION OF FLORIDA (Registrant) By: /s/ Dennis S. Hudson, III Dennis S. Hudson, III Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer Date: February 27, 2020 Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. /s/ Dennis S. Hudson, III Dennis S. Hudson, III, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Director (principal executive officer) /s/ Charles M. Shaffer Charles M. Shaffer, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting officer) /s/ Dennis J. Arczynski Dennis J. Arczynski, Director /s/ Jacqueline L. Bradley Jacqueline L. Bradley, Director /s/ H. Gilbert Culbreth, Jr. H. Gilbert Culbreth, Jr, Director /s/ Julie H. Daum Julie H. Daum, Director /s/ Christopher E. Fogal Christopher E. Fogal, Director /s/ Maryann B. Goebel Maryann B. Goebel, Director /s/ Robert J. Lipstein Robert J. Lipstein, Director 136 Date February 27, 2020 February 27, 2020 February 27, 2020 February 27, 2020 February 27, 2020 February 27, 2020 February 27, 2020 February 27, 2020 February 27, 2020 /s/ Herbert A. Lurie Herbert A. Lurie, Director /s/ Alvaro J. Monserrat Alvaro J. Monserrat, Director /s/ Thomas E. Rossin Thomas E. Rossin, Director February 27, 2020 February 27, 2020 February 27, 2020 137 DESCRIPTION OF THE REGISTRANT’S SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Exhibit 4.1 Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida (“Seacoast,” “we,” “our,” or “us”) has one class of securities registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, our common stock. DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK The following descriptions are summaries of the material terms of our amended and restated articles of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws and include all material information with respect to our capital stock. Reference is made to the more detailed provisions of the amended and restated articles of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws, which are filed as exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K and are incorporated by reference herein. Common Stock General The following description of shares of Seacoast’s common stock, par value $0.10 per share, is a summary only and is subject to applicable provisions of the Florida Business Corporation Act, as amended, or the FBCA, and to Seacoast’s amended and restated articles of incorporation, as amended, and its amended and restated bylaws. Seacoast’s articles of incorporation provide that it may issue up to 120 million shares of common stock, par value of $0.10 per share. Seacoast common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “SBCF.” Voting Rights Each outstanding share of Seacoast’s common stock entitles the holder to one vote on all matters submitted to a vote of shareholders, including the election of directors. The holders of Seacoast common stock possess exclusive voting power, except as otherwise provided by law or by articles of amendment establishing any series of Seacoast preferred stock. There is no cumulative voting in the election of directors, which means that the holders of a plurality of Seacoast’s outstanding shares of common stock can elect all of the directors then standing for election. When a quorum is present at any meeting, questions brought before the meeting will be decided by the vote of the holders of a majority of the shares present and voting on such matter, whether in person or by proxy, except when the meeting concerns matters requiring the vote of the holders of a majority of all outstanding shares under applicable Florida law. Seacoast’s articles of incorporation provide certain anti-takeover provisions that require super-majority votes, which may limit shareholders’ rights to effect a change in control as described under the section below entitled “Anti-Takeover Effects of Certain articles of incorporation Provisions.” Dividends, Liquidation and Other Rights Holders of shares of common stock are entitled to receive dividends only when, as and if approved by Seacoast’s board of directors from funds legally available for the payment of dividends. Seacoast’s shareholders are entitled to share ratably in its assets legally available for distribution to its shareholders in the event of Seacoast’s liquidation, dissolution or winding up, voluntarily or involuntarily, after payment of, or adequate provision for, all of our known debts and liabilities and of any preferences of any series of our preferred stock that may be outstanding in the future. These rights are subject to the preferential rights of any series of Seacoast’s preferred stock that may then be outstanding. Holders of shares of Seacoast common stock have no preference, conversion, exchange, sinking fund or redemption rights and have no preemptive rights to subscribe for any of our securities. Seacoast’s board of directors, under its articles of incorporation, may issue additional shares of its common stock or rights to purchase shares of its common stock without shareholder approval. Restrictions on Ownership The Bank Holding Company Act requires any “bank holding company,” as defined in the Bank Holding Company Act, to obtain the approval of the Federal Reserve prior to the acquisition of 5% or more of our common shares. Any person, other than a bank holding company, is required to obtain prior approval of the Federal Reserve to acquire 10% or more of our common shares under the Change in Bank Control Act. Any holder of 25% or more of our common shares, or a holder of 5% or more if such holder otherwise exercises a “controlling influence” over us, is subject to regulation as a bank holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act. Certain provisions included in our amended and restated articles of incorporation and bylaws, as described further below, as well as certain provisions of the Florida Business Corporation Act and federal law, may discourage, delay or prevent potential acquisitions of control of us, particularly when attempted in a transaction that is not negotiated directly with, and approved by, our board of directors, despite possible benefits to our shareholders. Transfer Agent and Registrar The transfer agent and registrar for Seacoast common stock is Continental Stock Transfer and Trust Company. Anti-Takeover Effects of Certain Articles of Incorporation Provisions Seacoast’s articles of incorporation contain certain provisions that make it more difficult to acquire control of it by means of a tender offer, open market purchase, a proxy fight or otherwise. These provisions are designed to encourage persons seeking to acquire control of Seacoast to negotiate with its directors. Seacoast believes that, as a general rule, the interests of its shareholders would be best served if any change in control results from negotiations with its directors. Seacoast’s articles of incorporation provide for a classified board to which approximately one-third of its board of directors is elected each year at its annual meeting of shareholders. Accordingly, Seacoast’s directors serve three-year terms rather than one- year terms. The classification of Seacoast’s board of directors has the effect of making it more difficult for shareholders to change the composition of its board of directors. At least two annual meetings of shareholders, instead of one, will generally be required to effect a change in a majority of Seacoast’s board of directors. Such a delay may help ensure that its directors, if confronted by a shareholder attempting to force a proxy contest, a tender or exchange offer, or an extraordinary corporate transaction, would have sufficient time to review the proposal as well as any available alternatives to the proposal and to act in what they believe to be the best interests of Seacoast’s shareholders. The classification provisions apply to every election of directors, however, regardless of whether a change in the composition of Seacoast’s board of directors would be beneficial to Seacoast and its shareholders and whether or not a majority of its shareholders believe that such a change would be desirable. The classification of Seacoast’s board of directors could also have the effect of discouraging a third party from initiating a proxy contest, making a tender offer or otherwise attempting to obtain control of Seacoast, even though such an attempt might be beneficial to Seacoast and its shareholders. The classification of Seacoast’s board of directors could thus increase the likelihood that incumbent directors will retain their positions. In addition, because the classification of Seacoast’s board of directors may discourage accumulations of large blocks of its stock by purchasers whose objective is to take control of Seacoast and remove a majority of its board of directors, the classification of its board of directors could tend to reduce the likelihood of fluctuations in the market price of its common stock that might result from accumulations of large blocks of its common stock for such a purpose. Accordingly, Seacoast’s shareholders could be deprived of certain opportunities to sell their shares at a higher market price than might otherwise be the case. Seacoast’s articles of incorporation require the affirmative vote of the holders of not less than two-thirds of all the shares of its stock outstanding and entitled to vote generally in the election of directors in addition to the votes required by law or elsewhere in the articles of incorporation, the bylaws or otherwise, to approve: (a) any sale, lease, transfer, purchase and assumption of all or substantially all of its consolidated assets and/or liabilities, (b) any merger, consolidation, share exchange or similar transaction, or any merger of any significant subsidiary, into or with another person, or (c) any reclassification of securities, recapitalization or similar transaction that has the effect of increasing other than pro rata with the other shareholders, the proportionate amount of shares that is beneficially owned by an Affiliate (as defined in Seacoast’s articles of incorporation). Any business combination described above may instead be approved by the affirmative vote of a majority of all the votes entitled to be cast on the plan of merger if such business combination is approved and recommended to the shareholders by (x) the affirmative vote of two-thirds of Seacoast’s board of directors, and (y) a majority of the Continuing Directors (as defined in Seacoast’s articles of incorporation). Seacoast’s articles of incorporation also contain additional provisions that may make takeover attempts and other acquisitions of interests in it more difficult where the takeover attempt or other acquisition has not been approved by its board of directors. These provisions include: • A requirement that any change to Seacoast’s articles of incorporation relating to the structure of its board of directors, certain anti-takeover provisions and shareholder proposals must be approved by the affirmative vote of holders of two- thirds of the shares outstanding and entitled to vote; • A requirement that any change to Seacoast’s bylaws, including any change relating to the number of directors, must be approved by the affirmative vote of either (a) (i) two-thirds of its board of directors, and (ii) a majority of the continuing directors (as defined in Seacoast’s articles of incorporation) or (b) (i) two-thirds of the shares entitled to vote generally in the election of directors and (ii) an Independent Majority of Shareholders. An “Independent Majority of Shareholders” means the majority of the outstanding voting shares that are not beneficially owned or controlled, directly or indirectly by a related party. For these purposes, a “related party” means a beneficial owner of 5% or more of the voting shares, or any person who is an affiliate of Seacoast and at any time within five years was the beneficial owner of 5% or more of Seacoast’s then outstanding shares; provided, however, that this provision shall not include (i) any person who is the beneficial owner of more than 5% of Seacoast’s shares on February 28, 2003, (ii) any plan or trust established for the benefit of Seacoast’s employees generally, or (iii) any subsidiary of Seacoast that holds shares in a fiduciary capacity, whether or not it has the authority to vote or dispose of such securities; • A requirement that shareholders may call a meeting of shareholders on a proposed issue or issues only upon the receipt by Seacoast from the holders of 50% of all shares entitled to vote on the proposed issue or issues of signed and dated written demands for the meeting describing the purpose for which it is to be held; and • A requirement that a shareholder wishing to submit proposals for a shareholder vote or nominate directors for election comply with certain procedures, including advanced notice requirements. Seacoast’s articles of incorporation provide that, subject to the rights of any holders of its preferred stock to act by written consent instead of a meeting, shareholder action may be taken only at an annual meeting or special meeting of the shareholders and may not be taken by written consent. The articles of incorporation also include provisions that make it difficult to replace directors. Specifically, directors may be removed only for cause and only upon the affirmative vote at a meeting duly called and held for that purpose upon not less than thirty days prior written notice of (i) two-thirds of the shares entitled to vote generally in the election of directors and (ii) an Independent Majority of Shareholders. In addition, any vacancies on the board of directors for any reason, and any newly created directorships resulting from any increase in the number of directors, may be filled only by the board of directors (except if no directors remain on the board, in which case the shareholders may act to fill the vacant board). Seacoast believes that the power of its board of directors to issue additional authorized but unissued shares of its common stock or preferred stock without further action by its shareholders, unless required by applicable law or the rules of any stock exchange or automated quotation system on which its securities may be listed or traded, will provide Seacoast with increased flexibility in structuring possible future financings and acquisitions and in meeting other needs that might arise. Seacoast’s board of directors could authorize and issue a class or series of stock that could, depending upon the terms of such class or series, delay, defer or prevent a transaction or a change in control that might involve a premium price for holders of Seacoast’s common stock or that its shareholders otherwise consider to be in their best interest. The Company had the following subsidiaries as of the date of this report: LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES NAME 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. Seacoast National Bank South Branch Building, Inc. TC Property Venture, LLC SBCF Capital Trust I SBCF Statutory Trust II SBCF Statutory Trust III BankFIRST (FL) Statutory Trust I BankFIRST (FL) Statutory Trust II The BANKshares Capital Trust I Grand Bankshares Capital Trust I Syracuse Holdings, Inc. Seacoast Insurance Services, Inc. Seacoast Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc, EXHIBIT 21 INCORPORATED United States Florida Florida Delaware Connecticut Delaware Connecticut Delaware Delaware Delaware Delaware Florida Florida EXHIBIT 23.1 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-49972, 333-152931, 333-161014, 333-188290, 333-190507, 333-198682, 333-206589 and 333-226679) and Form S-3 (Nos. 333-221822 and 333-221834) of Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida (the Company) of our report dated February 27, 2020, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, cash flows, and shareholders’ equity for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2019, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, which report appears in the December 31, 2019 annual report on Form 10-K of the Company. /s/ Crowe LLP Crowe LLP Fort Lauderdale, Florida February 27, 2020 Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 EXHIBIT 31.1 I, Dennis S. Hudson, III, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. Date: February 27, 2020 /s/ Dennis S. Hudson, III Dennis S. Hudson, III Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 EXHIBIT 31.2 I, Charles M. Shaffer, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. Date: February 27, 2020 /s/ Charles M. Shaffer Charles M. Shaffer Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) EXHIBIT 32.1 STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF SEACOAST BANKING CORPORATION OF FLORIDA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida (“Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2019 (“Report”), I, Dennis S. Hudson, III, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: February 27, 2020 /s/ Dennis S. Hudson, III Dennis S. Hudson, III Chairman and Chief Executive Officer EXHIBIT 32.2 STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF SEACOAST BANKING CORPORATION OF FLORIDA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida (“Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2019 (“Report”), I, Charles M. Shaffer, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: February 27, 2020 /s/ Charles M. Shaffer Charles M. Shaffer Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above