2018 Annual Report
Notice of 2019 Annual Meeting
and Proxy Statement
Connecting Everyone and Everything,
All the Time
Technology will drive
innovation far beyond the
realm of smartphones
Connection speeds will reach 10 Gbps,
100 times faster than 4G
Will allow billions of devices
to be connected simultaneously
Will enable increasingly efficient and
safe vehicle communication, paving
the way for autonomous vehicles
Networks could make wireless
health care or remote surgical
procedures a reality
Dear Stockholders,
In fiscal 2018, Skyworks delivered its ninth consecutive year of record revenue and non-GAAP
earnings per share.* Market dynamics continue to validate Skyworks’ vision of Connecting Everyone
and Everything, All the Time as our disruptive technology facilitates the reinvention of entire
industries. With the 5G upgrade just around the corner, we stand at a critical juncture in the
advancement of ubiquitous connectivity.
Connectivity: The Catalyst for Market Growth
With decades of experience spanning multiple technology cycles, Skyworks has been a trusted
leader at the forefront of the communication revolution. Our engineering and research teams
have successfully pioneered architectures across an increasingly challenging and complex set of
end markets.
Our comprehensive product portfolio is vital to the world’s most important wireless protocols,
forming the backbone of the flourishing mobile economy. In fact, over the last 10 years in particular,
we have witnessed extraordinary growth in connectivity—supporting surging data demands for a
multitude of devices.
Today, this always-on, interconnected economy—powered by Skyworks—continues to change the
way our world operates, as evidenced by the rising success of large cap global firms who capitalize
on the value and utility of mobile data.
From data center to cloud, media and entertainment, to real-time door-to-door delivery of
products, to the way we travel, play and educate, the connected economy is at work, with
Skyworks ensuring fast, seamless and reliable performance.
Revenue ($M)
$3,868
$3,651
$3,258
$3,289
$2,292
$1,792
$1,419
$1,569
$4,000
$3,500
$3,000
$2,500
$2,000
$1,500
$1,000
$803
$1,072
$500
$0
FY09
FY10
FY11
FY12
FY13
FY14
FY15
FY16
FY17
FY18
*Please see table on page 69 for a full reconciliation of non-GAAP results to GAAP results.
Page 2 Revolutionizing Connectivity Through 5G
The transformational technology of tomorrow will be built on a new generation of connectivity solutions.
The applications enabled by 5G—which require continuous interaction between devices and the cloud—
demand high-speed data rates, near-zero latency and perfect reliability.
Unlike previous cellular standards, 5G has been designed specifically to facilitate massive machine-type
communications. Whereas connectivity growth in the past has been constrained in large part by the size
of the world’s population, the expansive nature of 5G presents no comparable limits to growth. Industry
analysts estimate 5G will fuel an installed base of over 75 billion connected things by 2025.† Taking this into
consideration, we anticipate the emergence of previously unimagined usage cases that will leverage the
power and performance of advanced connectivity.
As the early leader in the development of critical 5G technologies, we are successfully bringing an
extensive range of options to our customers. Our strength is underpinned by world-class performance
and scale across a broad array of capabilities that include millimeter wave, TC-SAW and BAW filters in
addition to an expanded family of MIMO, ultra-high band and diversity receive modules.
Skyworks is well positioned to resolve the challenges and complexity that arise from the deployment of
5G as we partner with our customers to deliver an abundance of integrated RF front-end systems from
the device level to the supporting network infrastructure.
Delivering Consistent Results
In fiscal 2018, we delivered another year of record results. Through steady execution against ambitious
strategic goals, Skyworks has achieved a compound annual revenue growth rate of 19 percent over the
past nine years.
$8.00
$7.00
$6.00
$5.00
$4.00
$3.00
$2.00
$1.26
$1.00
$0.69
Non-GAAP Earnings Per Share ($)*
$7.22
$6.45
$5.27
$5.57
$3.24
$1.89
$1.90
$2.20
0
†IHS Markit Ltd.
FY09
FY10
FY11
FY12
FY13
FY14
FY15
FY16
FY17
FY18
Page 3 Specifically, during the fiscal year, revenue grew 6 percent to $3.9 billion and non-GAAP diluted earnings
per share grew 12 percent to $7.22.* We generated $1.3 billion in cash flow from operations and
simultaneously funded critical R&D, capital expenditures and strategic acquisitions. Through dividends and
share buybacks, we returned over $1 billion to stockholders—an all-time high for Skyworks. Further, our
balance sheet remained very strong, as we ended fiscal 2018 with cash and marketable securities of more
than $1 billion and no debt.
Extending our Reach Across Markets and Customers
During the year, we launched our first production samples from our marquee Sky5™ platform and
expanded our footprint, securing design wins in emerging automotive, Internet of Things (IoT) and
artificial intelligence markets. Of note, our highly diversified Broad Markets business posted double-
digit percentage growth in revenue year-over-year, while adding a host of new customers in diverse and
profitable markets. At the same time, we strategically extended our content reach across numerous
flagship smartphones.
Furthermore, after years of progressive development and intense focus on performance, we successfully
unveiled our suite of BAW filter–enabled solutions squarely targeted at capturing new opportunities
in 5G. Finally, we added smart audio and artificial intelligence analog system-on-chips to our portfolio
through the acquisition of Avnera Corporation.
Positioned for Long-Term Growth
Looking to the future, we expect our market-leading communication engines to provide the foundation
for newly connected ecosystems as we leverage our 5G, IoT, filtering and smart audio innovations.
Strategic investments in our world-class manufacturing sites, a culture of success driven by our talented
global team and coveted customer partnerships have collectively positioned us to execute with
unparalleled expertise and meaningfully impact the mobile landscape.
We appreciate the confidence and trust you have placed in us and look forward to sharing a prosperous
journey with you as the coming age of connectivity catapults Skyworks into a new era of unprecedented
opportunity.
Liam K. Griffin
President and Chief Executive Officer
*Please see table on page 69 for a full reconciliation of non-GAAP results to GAAP results.
Page 4 Liam K. Griffin
President,
Chief Executive Officer
and Director
Carlos S. Bori
Senior Vice President,
Sales and Marketing
Kari A. Durham
Senior Vice President,
Human Resources
Peter L. Gammel
Chief Technology Officer
Reza Kasnavi
Vice President,
Central Engineering
and Quality
Manpreet S. Khaira
Vice President and
General Manager,
AI Solutions
Joel R. King
Senior Vice President and
General Manager,
Mobile Solutions
Steven C. Machuga
Vice President,
Worldwide Operations
Kris Sennesael
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
David Stasey
Vice President and
General Manager,
Diversified Analog Solutions
Robert J. Terry
Senior Vice President,
General Counsel
and Secretary
Page 5 Page 6 25MAR201912514653
March 29, 2019
Dear Stockholder:
I am pleased to invite you to attend the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Skyworks Solutions, Inc. to
be held at 2:00 p.m., local time, on Wednesday, May 8, 2019, at the Boston Marriott Burlington, 1 Burlington
Mall Road, Burlington, Massachusetts (the ‘‘Annual Meeting’’). We look forward to your participation in person
or by proxy. The attached Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement describe the
matters that we expect to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting.
If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, please check the designated box on the proxy card. Or, if you
utilize our telephone or Internet proxy submission methods, please indicate your plans to attend the Annual
Meeting when prompted to do so. If you are a stockholder of record, you should bring the top half of your
proxy card as your admission ticket and present it upon entering the Annual Meeting. If you are planning to
attend the Annual Meeting and your shares are held in ‘‘street name’’ by your broker (or other nominee),
you should ask the broker (or other nominee) for a proxy issued in your name and present it at the meeting.
Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, and regardless of how many shares you own, it is
important that your shares be represented at the Annual Meeting. Accordingly, we urge you to complete the
proxy and return it to us promptly in the postage-prepaid envelope provided, or to complete and submit
your proxy by telephone or via the Internet in accordance with the instructions on the proxy card. If you do
attend the Annual Meeting and wish to vote in person, you may revoke a previously submitted proxy at that
time by voting in person at the meeting.
Sincerely yours,
1APR201504292449
David J. Aldrich
Chairman of the Board
7
Page 7
Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
20 Sylvan Road
Woburn, MA 01801
(781) 376-3000
5221 California Avenue
Irvine, CA 92617
(949) 231-3000
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders
To Be Held on Wednesday, May 8, 2019
To the Stockholders of Skyworks Solutions, Inc.:
The 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Skyworks Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the ‘‘Company’’),
will be held at 2:00 p.m., local time, on Wednesday, May 8, 2019, at the Boston Marriott Burlington, 1 Burlington Mall
Road, Burlington, Massachusetts (the ‘‘Annual Meeting’’) to consider and act upon the following proposals:
1. To elect nine individuals nominated to serve as directors of the Company with terms expiring at the 2020
Annual Meeting of Stockholders and named in the Proxy Statement;
2. To ratify the selection by the Company’s Audit Committee of KPMG LLP as the independent registered public
accounting firm for the Company for fiscal year 2019;
3. To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers;
4. To consider one stockholder proposal, if properly presented at the Annual Meeting; and
5. To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting.
Only stockholders of record at the close of business on March 14, 2019, are entitled to notice of and to vote at the
Annual Meeting. To ensure your representation at the Annual Meeting, we urge you to submit a proxy promptly in
one of the following ways whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting: (a) by completing, signing, and dating
the proxy card and returning it in the postage-prepaid envelope provided for that purpose; (b) by completing and
submitting your proxy using the toll-free telephone number listed on the proxy card; or (c) by completing and
submitting your proxy via the Internet by visiting the website address listed on the proxy card. The Proxy Statement
accompanying this notice describes each of the items of business listed above in more detail. Our Board of Directors
recommends: a vote ‘‘FOR’’ the election of the nominees for director named in Proposal 1 of the Proxy Statement; a
vote ‘‘FOR’’ Proposal 2, ratifying the selection of KPMG LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of
the Company for fiscal year 2019; and a vote ‘‘FOR’’ Proposal 3, approving, on an advisory basis, the compensation of
the Company’s named executive officers. Our Board of Directors makes no recommendation regarding how
stockholders should vote on Proposal 4.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
27MAR201717592459
ROBERT J. TERRY
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
Page 8
8
Proxy Statement 2019
19MAR201913333406
20 Sylvan Road
Woburn, MA 01801
(781) 376-3000
5221 California Avenue
Irvine, CA 92617
(949) 231-3000
Proxy Statement
2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
19MAR201913333406
Table of Contents
General Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Proposal 1: Election of Directors . . . . . 15
Election of Directors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nominees for Election . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Corporate Governance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Committees of the Board of Directors . . . . .
Role of the Board of Directors in Risk
Oversight . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Compensation Committee Interlocks and
Insider Participation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Certain Relationships and Related Person
Transactions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
15
16
21
24
27
28
28
Proposal 2: Ratification of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm . . . . 29
Audit Fees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
29
Report of the Audit Committee . . . . . . . 31
Proposal 3: Advisory Vote on the
Compensation of Our Named Executive
Officers (‘‘Say-on-Pay Vote’’) . . . . . . . . . 32
Information About Executive and
Director Compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
Summary and Highlights . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Compensation Discussion and Analysis . . . . .
Compensation Tables for Named Executive
Officers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Director Compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equity Compensation Plan Information . . . .
33
35
43
57
59
Compensation Committee Report . . . . . 61
Proposal 4: Stockholder Proposal
Regarding Simple Majority Voting . . . . 62
Statement by the Board of Directors on the
Stockholder Proposal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
63
Security Ownership of Certain
Beneficial Owners and Management . . . 64
Other Proposed Action . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
Other Matters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
Appendix A: Unaudited Reconciliations
of Non-GAAP Financial Measures . . . . 69
Discussion Regarding the Use of Non-GAAP
Financial Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
71
Page 10
10
General Information
How do we refer to Skyworks in this Proxy Statement?
Who can vote at our Annual Meeting?
When and where is our Annual Meeting?
The terms ‘‘Skyworks,’’ ‘‘the Company,’’ ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ and
Only stockholders of record at the close of business on
‘‘our’’ refer to Skyworks Solutions, Inc., a Delaware March 14, 2019 (the ‘‘Record Date’’), are entitled to
notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. As of
corporation, and its consolidated subsidiaries.
March 14, 2019, there were 173,001,607 shares of
Skyworks’ common stock
issued and outstanding.
Pursuant
to Skyworks’ Restated Certificate of
Incorporation and By-laws, and applicable Delaware
law, each share of common stock entitles the holder of
record at the close of business on the Record Date to
one vote on each matter considered at the Annual
Meeting.
The Company’s 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is
to be held on Wednesday, May 8, 2019, at the Boston
Marriott Burlington, 1 Burlington Mall Road,
Burlington, Massachusetts, at 2:00 p.m., local time, or at
any adjournment or postponement thereof (the ‘‘Annual
Meeting’’).
What is the purpose of the Annual Meeting?
Is my vote important?
At the Annual Meeting, stockholders will consider and
vote on the following matters:
1. The election of the nine nominees named in this
Proxy Statement to our Board of Directors to serve
until the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
2. The ratification of the selection of KPMG LLP as
our independent registered public accounting firm
for the fiscal year ending September 27, 2019 (‘‘fiscal
year 2019’’).
3. The approval, on a non-binding basis, of the
compensation of our Named Executive Officers, as
described below under ‘‘Compensation Discussion
and Analysis,’’ and in the executive compensation
tables and accompanying narrative disclosures in this
Proxy Statement.
4. A non-binding stockholder proposal regarding
if properly
voting provisions,
supermajority
presented at the Annual Meeting.
The stockholders will also act on any other business that
may properly come before the meeting.
What is included in our proxy materials?
The Company’s Annual Report, which includes financial
statements and ‘‘Management’s Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operation’’ for the
fiscal year ended September 28, 2018 (‘‘fiscal year
2018’’), accompanies this Proxy Statement. This Proxy
Statement and form of proxy, and/or notice of access
thereto, are being first mailed to stockholders on or
about March 29, 2019. The Proxy Statement and the
Company’s Annual Report
at
are
http://www.skyworksinc.com/annualreport.
available
Yes. Your vote is important no matter how many shares
you own. Please take the time to vote in the way that is
easiest and most convenient for you, and cast your vote
as soon as possible.
How do I vote if I am a stockholder of record?
As a stockholder of record, you may vote in one of the
following three ways whether or not you plan to attend
the Annual Meeting: (a) by completing, signing, and
dating the proxy card and returning it in the postage-
prepaid envelope provided for that purpose, (b) by
completing and submitting your proxy using the toll-free
telephone number listed on the proxy card, or (c) by
completing and submitting your proxy via the Internet at
the website address listed on the proxy card. If you
attend the Annual Meeting, you may vote in person at
the Annual Meeting even
if you have previously
submitted your proxy by mail, telephone, or via the
Internet (and your vote at the Annual Meeting will
automatically revoke your previously submitted proxy,
although mere attendance at the meeting without voting
in person will not have that result).
How do I vote if I am a beneficial owner of shares held in
‘‘street name’’?
If your shares are held on your behalf by a third party
such as your broker or another person or entity who
holds shares of the Company on your behalf and for your
benefit, which person or entity we refer to as a
‘‘nominee,’’ and your broker (or other nominee) is the
stockholder of record of such shares, then you are the
beneficial owner of such shares and we refer to those
shares as being held in ‘‘street name.’’ As the beneficial
owner of your ‘‘street name’’ shares, you are entitled to
instruct your broker (or other nominee) as to how to
11
Proxy Statement Page 11
vote your shares. Your broker (or other nominee) will
provide you with information regarding how to instruct
your broker (or other nominee) as to the voting of your
‘‘street name’’ shares.
How do I vote if I am a participant in the Skyworks
401(k) Savings and Investment Plan?
If you are a participant in the Skyworks 401(k) Savings
and Investment Plan (the ‘‘401(k) Plan’’), you will
receive an instruction card for the Skyworks shares you
own through the 401(k) Plan. That instruction card will
serve as a voting instruction card for the trustee of the
401(k) Plan, and your 401(k) Plan shares will be voted as
you instruct.
Can I change my vote after I have voted?
Any proxy given pursuant to this solicitation may be
revoked by the person giving it at any time before it is
voted at the Annual Meeting. Proxies may be revoked by
(a) delivering to the Secretary of the Company, before
the taking of the vote at the Annual Meeting, a written
notice of revocation bearing a later date than the proxy,
(b) duly completing a later-dated proxy relating to the
same shares and presenting it to the Secretary of the
Company before the taking of the vote at the Annual
Meeting, or (c) attending the Annual Meeting and
voting there in person (although attendance at the
Annual Meeting will not in and of itself constitute a
revocation of a proxy). Any written notice of revocation
or subsequent proxy should be delivered to the
Company’s executive offices at Skyworks Solutions, Inc.,
5221 California Avenue, Irvine, CA 92617, Attention:
Secretary, or hand delivered to the Secretary of the
Company, before the taking of the vote at the Annual
Meeting.
Can I attend the Annual Meeting?
If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, please be sure
to indicate your intent to attend by checking the
designated box on your proxy card if you are submitting
a proxy via mail, or by indicating when prompted if you
are submitting a proxy through either Skyworks’
telephone or Internet proxy submission procedures. In
either case, save the admission ticket attached to your
proxy (the top half) and bring that with you to the
Annual Meeting. If your shares are held in ‘‘street
name’’ by your broker (or other nominee), you should
consult your instruction card to determine how to
indicate your intent to attend the Annual Meeting. If
your
instruction card does not provide any such
indication, you should contact your broker (or other
nominee) to determine what you will need to do to be
able to attend and vote at the Annual Meeting. In order
to be admitted to the Annual Meeting, you will need to
present your admission ticket or the appropriate
documentation from your broker (or other nominee), as
well as provide valid picture identification, such as a
driver’s license or passport.
If I vote by proxy, how will my vote be cast?
The persons named as attorneys-in-fact in this Proxy
Statement, Liam K. Griffin and Robert J. Terry, were
selected by the Board of Directors and are officers of the
Company. As attorneys-in-fact, Messrs. Griffin and Terry
will vote any shares represented at the meeting by proxy.
Each executed proxy card returned by a stockholder of
record or proxy vote recorded via telephone or the
Internet by a stockholder of record in the manner
provided on the proxy card prior to the taking of the
vote at the Annual Meeting will be voted. Where a
choice has been specified in an executed proxy with
respect to the matters to be acted upon at the Annual
Meeting, the shares represented by the proxy will be
voted in accordance with the choices specified.
How will my shares be voted if I do not give specific voting
instructions when I deliver my proxy?
If you are a stockholder of record and deliver a proxy but
do not give specific voting instructions, then the proxy
holders will vote your shares as recommended by the
Board of Directors.
If your shares are held in ‘‘street name,’’ your broker (or
other nominee) is required to vote those shares in
accordance with your instructions. If you do not give
instructions to your broker (or other nominee), your
broker (or other nominee) will only be entitled to vote
your shares with respect to ‘‘discretionary’’ matters, as
described below, but will not be permitted to vote the
shares with respect to ‘‘non-discretionary’’ matters. If
you beneficially own shares that are held in ‘‘street
name’’ by your broker (or other nominee), we strongly
encourage you to provide instructions to your broker (or
other nominee) as to how to vote on the election of
directors and all of the Proposals by signing, dating, and
returning to your broker (or other nominee) the
instruction card provided by your broker (or other
nominee). If you are a participant in the 401(k) Plan, the
trustee of the 401(k) Plan will not vote your 401(k) Plan
shares if the trustee does not receive voting instructions
from you by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 3, 2019,
unless otherwise required by law.
Page 12 Proxy Statement
12
What is a ‘‘broker non-vote’’?
voting
instructions
A ‘‘broker non-vote’’ occurs when your broker (or other
nominee) submits a proxy for your shares (because the
broker
received
(or other nominee) has either
instructions from you on one or more proposals, but not
all, or has not received instructions from you but is
entitled to vote on a particular ‘‘discretionary’’ matter)
but does not indicate a vote ‘‘FOR’’ a particular proposal
because the broker (or other nominee) either does not
have authority to vote on that proposal and has not
received
you or has
‘‘discretionary’’ authority on the proposal but chooses
not to exercise it. ‘‘Broker non-votes’’ are not counted as
votes ‘‘FOR’’ or ‘‘AGAINST’’ the proposal in question or
as abstentions, nor are they counted to determine the
number of votes present for the particular proposal. We
do, however, count ‘‘broker non-votes’’ for the purpose
of determining a quorum for the Annual Meeting. If
your shares are held in ‘‘street name’’ by your broker (or
other nominee), please check the instruction card
provided by your broker (or other nominee) or contact
your broker (or other nominee) to determine whether
you will be able to vote by telephone or via the Internet.
from
What vote is required for each matter?
the Annual Meeting exceed
Election of Directors. Pursuant to the Company’s
By-laws, a nominee will be elected to the Board of
Directors if the votes cast ‘‘FOR’’ the nominee’s election
at
the votes cast
‘‘AGAINST’’ the nominee’s election (as long as the only
director nominees are those individuals set forth in this
Proxy Statement). Abstentions and ‘‘broker non-votes’’
will not count as votes ‘‘FOR’’ or ‘‘AGAINST.’’ If the
shares you own are held in ‘‘street name,’’ your broker
(or other nominee), as the record holder of your shares,
is required to vote your shares according to your
instructions. Proposal 1 is not considered to be a
‘‘discretionary’’ matter for certain brokers. If you do not
instruct your broker how to vote with respect to this item,
your broker may not vote your shares with respect to the
election of directors. In such case, a ‘‘broker non-vote’’
may occur, which will have no effect on the outcome of
Proposal 1.
respect to this proposal in its discretion. With respect to
Proposal 2, a vote of ‘‘ABSTAIN’’ will have the same
effect as a vote of ‘‘AGAINST.’’
Say-on-Pay Vote; Stockholder Proposal. The affirmative
vote of a majority of the shares present in person, or
represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting, and
entitled to vote on such matter at the Annual Meeting, is
required to approve Proposals 3 and 4. Proposals 3 and 4
are not considered to be ‘‘discretionary’’ matters for
certain brokers. If you do not instruct your broker how
to vote with respect to these items, your broker may not
vote your shares with respect to these proposals. In such
case, a ‘‘broker non-vote’’ may occur, which will have no
effect on the outcome of Proposals 3 and 4. Votes that
are marked ‘‘ABSTAIN’’ are counted as present and
entitled to vote with respect to Proposals 3 and 4, and
will have the same impact as a vote that is marked
‘‘AGAINST’’ for purposes of Proposals 3 and 4.
How does the Board of Directors recommend that I vote?
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote:
FOR the election of each of the nine director nominees
(Proposal 1).
FOR the ratification of the selection of KPMG LLP as
our independent registered public accounting firm for
fiscal year 2019 (Proposal 2).
FOR the approval, on a non-binding basis, of the
compensation of our Named Executive Officers, as
described below under ‘‘Compensation Discussion and
Analysis,’’ and in the executive compensation tables and
accompanying narrative disclosures (Proposal 3).
The Board of Directors makes no recommendation
regarding how you vote on the approval, on a
non-binding basis, of a stockholder proposal regarding
supermajority voting provisions (Proposal 4).
How will the votes cast at our Annual Meeting be
counted?
An automated system administered by the Company’s
transfer agent tabulates the votes at the Annual
Meeting. The vote on each matter submitted to
stockholders will be tabulated separately.
Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm. The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares
present in person, or represented by proxy at the Annual
Meeting, and entitled to vote on such matter at the
Annual Meeting, is required to approve Proposal 2.
Proposal 2 involves a matter on which a broker (or other We expect to announce the preliminary voting results at
nominee) does have ‘‘discretionary’’ authority to vote. If
our Annual Meeting. The final voting results will be
you do not instruct your broker how to vote with respect
reported in a Current Report on Form 8-K that will be
to this item, your broker may still vote your shares with
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Where can I find the voting results of our Annual
Meeting?
13
Proxy Statement Page 13
request
your written
Inc., 5221 California Avenue,
Some brokers (or other nominees) may be participating
in the practice of ‘‘householding’’ proxy statements and
annual reports. This means that only one copy of this
Proxy Statement and our Annual Report may have been
sent to multiple stockholders in your household. If you
are a stockholder and your household or address has
received only one Annual Report and one Proxy
Statement, the Company will promptly deliver a separate
copy of the Annual Report and the Proxy Statement to
you, upon
to Skyworks
Irvine,
Solutions,
CA 92617, Attention: Investor Relations, or oral request
to Investor Relations at (949) 231-3433. If you would like
to receive separate copies of our Annual Report and
Proxy Statement in the future, you should direct such
request to your broker (or other nominee). Even if your
household or address has received only one Annual
Report and one Proxy Statement, a separate proxy card
should have been provided for each stockholder account.
Each individual proxy card should be signed, dated, and
returned in the postage-prepaid envelope (or completed
and submitted by telephone or via the Internet, as
described on the proxy card). If your household has
received multiple copies of our Annual Report and
Proxy Statement, you can request the delivery of single
copies in the future by contacting your broker (or other
nominee), or the Company at the address or telephone
number above.
‘‘SEC’’) within four business days after the end of our What is ‘‘householding’’?
Annual Meeting and will be posted on our website.
Will my vote be kept confidential?
Yes. We will keep your vote confidential unless (1) we
are required by law to disclose your vote (including in
connection with the pursuit or defense of a legal or
administrative action or proceeding), or (2) there is a
contested election for the Board of Directors. The
inspector of elections will forward any written comments
that you make on the proxy card to management without
providing your name, unless you expressly request on
your proxy card that your name be disclosed.
What is the quorum requirement for our Annual
Meeting?
The holders of a majority of the issued and outstanding
stock of the Company present either in person or by
proxy at the Annual Meeting constitute a quorum for the
transaction of business at the Annual Meeting. Shares
that abstain from voting on any proposal and ‘‘broker
non-votes’’ will be counted as shares that are present for
purposes of determining whether a quorum exists at the
Annual Meeting. If a ‘‘broker non-vote’’ occurs with
respect to any shares of the Company’s common stock
on any matter, then those shares will be treated as not
present and not entitled to vote with respect to that
matter (even though those shares are considered entitled
to vote for purposes of determining whether a quorum
exists because they are entitled to vote on other matters)
and will not be voted.
When will Skyworks next hold an advisory vote on the
frequency of say-on-pay votes?
Skyworks currently conducts an annual say-on-pay vote.
The next advisory vote on the frequency of say-on-pay
votes is expected to be held at our 2023 Annual Meeting
of Stockholders.
Page 14 Proxy Statement
14
Proposal 1:
Election of Directors
Election of Directors
Under this Proposal 1, you are being asked to consider nine nominees for election to our Board of Directors to
serve until the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their successors are elected and qualified or until their
earlier resignation or removal. The names of the nine nominees for election as directors, their current positions and
offices, the year such nominees were first elected as directors of the Company and their Board committee
memberships are set forth in the table below. Each nominee for election has agreed to serve if elected, and the Board
of Directors knows of no reason why any nominee should be unable or unwilling to serve. If a nominee is unable or
unwilling to serve, the attorneys-in-fact named in this Proxy Statement will vote any shares represented at the meeting
by proxy for the election of another individual nominated by the Board of Directors, if any. No nominee or executive
officer is related by blood, marriage, or adoption to any other director, nominee, or executive officer. No
arrangements or understandings exist between any director or person nominated for election as a director and any
other person pursuant to which such person is to be selected as a director or nominee for election as a director.
David J. McLachlan, age 80, has served as a director since 2000 and will not stand for reelection at the Annual
Meeting. As a result, the number of directors constituting the Board of Directors will be reduced from ten (10) to
nine (9) effective upon the election of directors at the Annual Meeting. Proxies cannot be voted for a greater number
of individuals than the number of nominees named in this Proxy Statement.
Nominee
David J. Aldrich
Kevin L. Beebe
Timothy R. Furey
Liam K. Griffin
Balakrishnan S. Iyer
Christine King
David P. McGlade
Robert A. Schriesheim
Kimberly S. Stevenson
Position(s) with
the Company
First Year
of Service Committee
Audit
Compensation Nominating and Corporate
Committee
Governance Committee
Chairman of the Board
Director
Director
President, Chief Executive
Officer, and Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
2000
2004
1998
2016
2002
2014
2005
2006
2018
M
C
M
M
C
M
M
C
M
M
M
‘‘C’’ indicates Chair and ‘‘M’’ indicates Member of the respective committee
Immediately below this proposal is biographical information about each of the director nominees, including
information regarding each nominee’s business experience for the past five years, and the names of other public
companies for which each nominee has served as a director during the past five years. The information presented
below regarding the specific experience, qualifications, attributes, and skills of each nominee led our Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee and our Board of Directors to conclude that he or she should serve as a director.
In addition, we believe that all of our nominees have integrity, business acumen, good judgment, knowledge of our
business and industry, experience in one or more areas relevant to our business and strategy, and the willingness to
devote the time needed to be an effective director.
Majority Vote Standard for Election of Directors
A nominee for election as a director in an uncontested election (an election where the number of nominees for
election as directors is equal to or less than the number of directors to be elected) will be elected if the number of
votes cast ‘‘FOR’’ such nominee’s election exceed the number of votes cast ‘‘AGAINST’’ the nominee’s election. In a
contested election (in which the number of nominees for election as directors exceeds the number of directors to be
elected at such meeting), directors are elected by a plurality of all votes cast in such election.
15
Proxy Statement Page 15
The election of directors at this Annual Meeting is uncontested. As a result, each nominee for election as a
director at the Annual Meeting will only be elected if the votes cast ‘‘FOR’’ such nominee exceed the number of votes
cast ‘‘AGAINST’’ such nominee. As required by our corporate governance guidelines, which are available on the
Investor Relations portion of the Company’s website at http://www.skyworksinc.com, each incumbent director who is a
nominee for election as a director at the Annual Meeting submitted to the Board of Directors an irrevocable
resignation that would become effective if the votes cast ‘‘FOR’’ such nominee’s election do not exceed the votes cast
‘‘AGAINST’’ such nominee’s election and our Board of Directors determines to accept his or her resignation. Upon
such resignation by a nominee and pursuant to the procedures set forth in the corporate governance guidelines, the
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will evaluate the best interests of our Company and stockholders
and will recommend to our Board of Directors the action to be taken with respect to the resignation. The Board of
Directors will then decide whether to accept, reject, or modify the Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee’s recommendation, and the Company will publicly disclose such decision by the Board of Directors with
respect to the director nominee.
Shares represented by all proxies received by the Board of Directors that are properly completed, but do not
specify a choice as to the election of directors, will be voted ‘‘FOR’’ the election of all nine of the nominees.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS
A VOTE ‘‘FOR’’ THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE NINE NOMINEES IN PROPOSAL 1
Nominees for Election
David J. Aldrich, age 62, serves as Chairman of the Board, a position he has held since May 2014. Mr. Aldrich also
served as Executive Chairman from May 2016 to May 2018, Chief Executive Officer from May 2014 to May 2016, and
as President and Chief Executive Officer and as a director from April 2000 to May 2014. From September 1999 to
April 2000, Mr. Aldrich served as President and Chief Operating Officer. From May 1999 to September 1999, he
served as Executive Vice President, and from May 1996 to May 1999, he served as Vice President and General
Manager of the semiconductor products business unit. Mr. Aldrich joined the Company in 1995 as Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. Prior to joining Skyworks, he held senior management positions at Adams-
Russell Company and M/A-COM, Inc. Mr. Aldrich also serves as a director of Belden Inc. (a publicly traded provider
of end-to-end signal transmission solutions) and Acacia Communications, Inc. (a publicly traded provider of
high-speed coherent optical interconnect products).
We believe that Mr. Aldrich is qualified to serve as a director because of his leadership experience, his strategic
decision making ability, his knowledge of the semiconductor industry and his in-depth knowledge of Skyworks’
business. Mr. Aldrich brings to the Board of Directors his thorough knowledge of Skyworks’ business, strategy, people,
operations, competition, financial position, and investors. Further, as a result of his service as a director for
Belden Inc. and Acacia Communications, Inc., multinational public companies, Mr. Aldrich provides the Board of
Directors with other organizational perspectives and cross-board experience.
Kevin L. Beebe, age 60, has been a director since January 2004. Since November 2007, he has been President and
Chief Executive Officer of 2BPartners, LLC (a partnership that provides strategic, financial, and operational advice to
private equity investors and management). In 2014, Mr. Beebe became a founding partner of Astra Capital
Management (a private equity firm based in Washington, D.C.). Previously, beginning in 1998, he was Group
President of Operations at ALLTEL Corporation (a telecommunications services company). From 1996 to 1998,
Mr. Beebe served as Executive Vice President of Operations for 360(cid:2) Communications Co. (a wireless communication
company). He has held a variety of executive and senior management positions at several divisions of Sprint, including
Vice President of Operations and Vice President of Marketing and Administration for Sprint Cellular, Director of
Marketing for Sprint North Central Division, Director of Engineering and Operations Staff and Director of Product
Management and Business Development for Sprint Southeast Division, as well as Staff Director of Product Services at
Sprint Corporation. Mr. Beebe began his career at AT&T/Southwestern Bell as a Manager. Mr. Beebe also serves as
chairman of the board of directors of NII Holdings, Inc. (a publicly traded provider of mobile communication services
in Brazil), and as a director for SBA Communications Corporation (a publicly traded operator of wireless
communications infrastructure in North, Central, and South America), Syniverse Technologies, Inc. (a privately held
Page 16 Proxy Statement
16
provider of enterprise messaging solutions), and Logix Communications (a privately held provider of facilities-based
communications services).
We believe that Mr. Beebe is qualified to serve as a director because of his two decades of experience as an
operating executive in the wireless telecommunications industry. For example, as Group President of Operations at
ALLTEL, he was instrumental in expanding ALLTEL’s higher margin retail business, which significantly enhanced
ALLTEL’s competitive position in a dynamic, consolidating industry. In addition, as Chief Executive Officer of
2BPartners, LLC, Mr. Beebe continues to gain a broad range of business experience and to build business
relationships by advising leading private equity firms that are transacting business in the global capital markets.
Mr. Beebe provides cross-board experience by serving as a director for several public and private companies
(including service on both audit and governance committees). Further, Mr. Beebe has served as a director of Skyworks
since 2004 and has gained significant familiarity with Skyworks’ business.
Timothy R. Furey, age 60, has been a director since 1998. He has been Chief Executive Officer of MarketBridge (a
privately owned digital marketing software and services firm) since 1991. MarketBridge provides digital marketing,
predictive analytics, and sales effectiveness solutions to Fortune 1000 companies in the software, communications,
financial services, life sciences, and consumer products sectors. Mr. Furey also serves as Managing Partner of the
Technology Marketing Group (which advises and invests in emerging growth companies in the social media, mobile,
and marketing automation markets). Prior to 1991, Mr. Furey worked with the Boston Consulting Group, Strategic
Planning Associates, Kaiser Associates, and the Marketing Science Institute.
We believe that Mr. Furey is qualified to serve as a director because his experience as Chief Executive Officer of
MarketBridge, as well as his engagements with MarketBridge’s clients (many of which are Fortune 1000 companies),
provide him with a broad range of knowledge regarding business operations and growth strategies. In addition,
Mr. Furey has extensive knowledge regarding Skyworks’ business, which he has acquired through over two decades of
service on the Board of Directors.
Liam K. Griffin, age 52, is President and Chief Executive Officer and a director of the Company. Prior to his
appointment as Chief Executive Officer and to the Board of Directors in May 2016, he had served as President since
May 2014. He served as Executive Vice President and Corporate General Manager from November 2012 to May 2014,
Executive Vice President and General Manager, High Performance Analog from May 2011 to November 2012, and
Senior Vice President, Sales and Marketing from August 2001 to May 2011. Previously, Mr. Griffin was employed by
Vectron International, a division of Dover Corp., as Vice President of Worldwide Sales from 1997 to 2001 and as Vice
President of North American Sales from 1995 to 1997. His prior experience included positions as a Marketing
Manager at AT&T Microelectronics, Inc. and Product and Process Engineer at AT&T Network Systems. Mr. Griffin
also serves as a director of Vicor Corp. (a publicly traded manufacturer and marketer of modular power components)
and of National Instruments Corporation (a publicly traded provider of software-defined platforms for automated test
and measurement systems).
We believe that Mr. Griffin is qualified to serve as a director because of his breadth of leadership experience and
in-depth understanding of Skyworks’ business gained through serving in several different executive positions at
Skyworks over the past 17 years. Mr. Griffin brings to the Board of Directors strong relationships with Skyworks’ key
customers, investors, employees, and other stakeholders, as well as a deep understanding of the semiconductor
industry and its competitive landscape. His service as a director for Vicor and National Instruments gives Mr. Griffin
added perspective regarding the challenges confronting public technology companies.
Balakrishnan S. Iyer, age 62, has been a director since June 2002. He served as Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of Conexant Systems, Inc., from October 1998 to June 2003. Prior to joining Conexant, Mr. Iyer
served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of VLSI Technology Inc. Prior to that, he was Corporate
Controller for Cypress Semiconductor Corp. and Director of Finance for Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Mr. Iyer
serves on the boards of directors of Power Integrations, Inc. (a publicly traded provider of semiconductor technologies
for high-voltage power conversion), IHS Markit Ltd. (a publicly traded company that delivers information, analytics
and expertise for industries and markets worldwide), and Churchill Capital Corp. (a publicly traded special purpose
acquisition company). He served as a director of Conexant from February 2002 until April 2011, as a director of Life
Technologies Corp. from July 2001 until February 2014, when it was acquired by Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., as a
17
Proxy Statement Page 17
director of IHS Inc. from December 2003 until July 2016, when it completed a merger with Markit Ltd., and as a
director of QLogic Corporation from June 2003 until August 2016, when it was acquired by Cavium, Inc.
We believe that Mr. Iyer is qualified to serve as a director because his experience as an executive officer of
companies in the technology industry provides him with leadership, strategic, and financial experience. Through his
experiences as a director at the public companies listed above (including as a member of certain audit, governance,
and compensation committees) he provides the Board of Directors with significant financial expertise as a designated
‘‘audit committee financial expert’’ for Skyworks’ Audit Committee, bringing specific application to our industry, as
well as a broad understanding of corporate governance topics.
Christine King, age 69, has been a director since January 2014. Ms. King served as Executive Chairman of QLogic
Corporation (a publicly traded developer of high performance server and storage networking connectivity products)
from August 2015 until August 2016, when it was acquired by Cavium, Inc. Previously, she served as a director and as
Chief Executive Officer of Standard Microsystems Corporation (a publicly traded developer of silicon-based
integrated circuits utilizing analog and mixed-signal technologies) from 2008 until the company’s acquisition in 2012
by Microchip Technology, Inc. Prior to Standard Microsystems, Ms. King was Chief Executive Officer of AMI
Semiconductor, Inc., a publicly traded company, from 2001 until it was acquired by ON Semiconductor Corp. in 2008.
From 1973 to 2001, Ms. King held various engineering, business, and management positions at IBM Corp., including
Vice President of Semiconductor Products. Ms. King currently serves as a director of IDACORP, Inc. (a publicly
traded holding company), and Idaho Power Company (a subsidiary of IDACORP). She previously served as a director
of Cirrus Logic, Inc., QLogic Corporation, Analog Devices, Inc., and Atheros Communications, Inc., prior to its
acquisition by Qualcomm, Inc.
We believe that Ms. King is qualified to serve as a director because of her extensive management and operational
experience in the high tech and semiconductor industries. In particular, through her experience as Executive
Chairman of QLogic and as Chief Executive Officer of Standard Microsystems and AMI Semiconductor, as well as
her service as a director of other public companies, Ms. King provides the Board of Directors with significant
strategic, operational, and financial expertise. She also serves as a designated ‘‘audit committee financial expert’’ for
Skyworks’ Audit Committee.
David P. McGlade, age 58, has been a director since February 2005. He serves as Chairman of the Board of
Intelsat S.A. (a publicly traded worldwide provider of satellite communication services), a position he has held since
April 2015. Mr. McGlade served as Executive Chairman of Intelsat from April 2015 to March 2018, prior to which he
served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. McGlade joined Intelsat in April 2005 and was the Deputy
Chairman of Intelsat from August 2008 until April 2013. Previously, Mr. McGlade served as an Executive Director of
mmO2 PLC and as the Chief Executive Officer of O2 UK (a subsidiary of mmO2), a position he held from October
2000 until March 2005. Before joining O2 UK, Mr. McGlade was President of the Western Region for Sprint PCS.
We believe that Mr. McGlade is qualified to serve as a director because of his over 30 years of experience in the
telecommunications business, which have allowed him to acquire significant operational, strategic, and financial
business acumen. Most recently, as a result of his work as the Chief Executive Officer of Intelsat, Mr. McGlade gained
significant leadership and operational experience, as well as knowledge about the global capital markets. He also
serves as a designated ‘‘audit committee financial expert’’ for Skyworks’ Audit Committee.
Robert A. Schriesheim, age 58, has been a director since May 2006. He currently serves as chairman of Truax
Partners LLC (a consulting firm). He served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Sears
Holdings (a nationwide retailer) from August 2011 to October 2016. From January 2010 to October 2010,
Mr. Schriesheim was Chief Financial Officer of Hewitt Associates, Inc. (a global human resources consulting and
outsourcing company that was acquired by Aon Corporation). From October 2006 until December 2009, he was the
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Lawson Software, Inc. (a publicly traded ERP software
provider). From August 2002 to October 2006, he was affiliated with ARCH Development Partners, LLC (a seed stage
venture capital fund). Before joining ARCH, Mr. Schriesheim held executive positions at Global TeleSystems, SBC
Equity Partners, Ameritech, AC Nielsen, and Brooke Group Ltd. Mr. Schriesheim currently serves as a director of
Frontier Communications Corporation (a publicly traded provider of communications services), Houlihan Lokey Inc.
(a publicly traded financial services firm), and NII Holdings, Inc. (a publicly traded provider of mobile communication
Page 18 Proxy Statement
18
services in Brazil), and previously served as a director of Lawson Software, until its sale in July 2011, and Forest City
Realty Trust, until its sale in December 2018. In addition, from 2004 until 2007, he was also a director of Dobson
Communications Corp. (a former publicly traded wireless services communications company that was acquired by
AT&T Inc.) and from 2007 until 2009 he served as a director of MSC Software Corp. (a former publicly traded
provider of integrated simulation solutions for designing and testing manufactured products that was acquired by
Symphony Technology Group).
We believe that Mr. Schriesheim is qualified to serve as a director because of his extensive knowledge of the
capital markets, experience with corporate financial capital structures, and long history of evaluating and structuring
merger and acquisition transactions within the technology sector. Mr. Schriesheim also has significant experience, as a
senior executive and director in both public and private companies in the technology sector, leading companies
through major strategic and financial corporate transformations while doing business in the global marketplace.
Kimberly S. Stevenson, age 56, has been a director since July 2018. In February 2019, she became a venture partner at
RIDGE-LANE Limited Partners (a strategic advisory and venture development firm). Previously, Ms. Stevenson
served as Senior Vice President and General Manager, Data Center Products and Solutions, at Lenovo Group Ltd. (a
publicly traded manufacturer of personal computers, data center equipment, smartphones, and tablets) from May
2017 to October 2018. From September 2009 to February 2017, she served as a Corporate Vice President at Intel
Corporation (a publicly traded semiconductor designer and manufacturer), holding various positions including Chief
Operating Officer for the Client and Internet of Things Businesses and Systems Architecture Group from September
2016 to February 2017, Chief Information Officer from February 2012 to August 2016, and General Manager, IT
Operations and Services, from September 2009 to January 2012. Prior to joining Intel, Ms. Stevenson held various
operations and management positions at Electronic Data Systems Corporation (now part of DXC Technology
Company) from 2002 to 2009 and at IBM Corp. from 1985 to 2002. Ms. Stevenson currently serves as a director of
Boston Private Financial Holdings, Inc. (a publicly traded wealth management company). She previously served as a
director of Riverbed Technology, Inc. (a publicly traded hardware and software developer), prior to its being taken
private in 2015.
We believe that Ms. Stevenson is qualified to serve as a director given her extensive experience in the
semiconductor and technology industries. With over three decades of senior management experience at companies in
various high tech disciplines, Ms. Stevenson brings to the Board of Directors a broad understanding of issues facing
the Company and its competitors and offers specific expertise on best practices within information systems and
operational risk management. Ms. Stevenson was identified as a director candidate by a search firm engaged by the
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.
19
Proxy Statement Page 19
Nine of our currently serving directors have been nominated for election to our Board of Directors to serve until
the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their successors are elected and qualified or until their earlier
resignation or removal. The table below summarizes the key qualifications and attributes relied upon by the Board of
Directors in nominating our current directors for election. Marks indicate specific areas of focus or expertise relied on
by the Board of Directors. The lack of a mark in a particular area does not necessarily signify a director’s lack of
qualification or experience in such area.
Other Public Company Boards
(Current)
Executive Leadership
Public Company CEO Experience
Public Company CFO Experience
International Business
Finance
Public Financial Reporting
Audit Committee Financial Expert*
Technology
Semiconductors
Sales / Marketing
Mergers and Acquisitions
Skyworks Board Tenure
(in Years)
Age
Gender
Male
Female
Race / Ethnicity
White / Caucasian
Asian, Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander
* per designation by Skyworks’ Board of Directors
Aldrich
B eebe
Furey
G riffin
Iyer
King
M c Glade
Schriesheim
Stevenson
2
19
62
2
15
60
0
21
60
2
3
52
3
17
62
1
5
69
1
14
58
3
13
58
1
<1
56
18MAR201917295826
In addition to the information presented above regarding each director’s specific experience, qualifications,
attributes and skills that led our Board of Directors to conclude that he or she should serve as a director, we also
believe that each of our directors has a reputation for integrity, honesty and adherence to high ethical standards. They
have each demonstrated business acumen, an ability to exercise sound judgment, and a commitment of service to
Skyworks.
Page 20 Proxy Statement
20
Corporate Governance
Shareholder Engagement and Best Practices
The following actions and policies, some of which were adopted in recent years after receiving feedback from our
stockholders, demonstrate the commitment of our Board of Directors to robust corporate governance and
responsiveness to stockholders:
• all of our directors are elected annually by a majority of votes cast in uncontested elections, and directors can
be removed by a majority of shares entitled to vote in the election of directors;
• stockholders who meet the applicable requirements may nominate and include in the Company’s proxy
materials director nominees, under the ‘‘proxy access’’ provisions in the Company’s By-laws;
• our Lead Independent Director provides leadership to the Board of Directors if there is a real or perceived
conflict of interest with regard to a particular matter between our Chairman and our Company or our
stockholders;
• in 2016, the Board of Directors recommended, and the Company’s stockholders approved, an amendment to
the Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation to eliminate the supermajority voting provision relating to
amendment of the Company’s By-laws;
• in 2018, the Board of Directors voluntarily implemented an amendment to the Company’s By-laws to provide a
stockholder special meeting right; and
• the Board of Directors took steps within the past year to refresh its membership, in July 2018 appointing
Ms. Stevenson who contributes to the Board of Directors her diversity of experience and background.
Because responsiveness to the Company’s stockholders is a critical part of our commitment to corporate
governance, we conduct outreach to our stockholders to understand their perspectives on various governance matters.
Most recently, we engaged in formal stockholder outreach following the 2018 Annual Meeting at which our
stockholders voted to approve a proposal ratifying the above-listed amendment to the Company’s By-laws to provide a
stockholder special meeting right. Specifically, we solicited feedback from institutional stockholders representing
approximately 70% of the votes identified as ‘‘against’’ the special meeting right ratification proposal. Each of the
institutional stockholders with whom we spoke told us that their opposition was a result of certain specific terms of the
By-law provision implementing the stockholder special meeting right (terms which varied by institution) and not
because they disapproved of the Company’s omission from the proxy statement of a stockholder proposal related to
adoption of a stockholder special meeting right. The Board of Directors considered this input, but decided not to
make any changes at this time, in part because there was no consensus among the stockholders as to which terms were
problematic or how the special meeting right should be modified.
Our Board of Directors values the opinions expressed by our stockholders and will continue to consider the
voting results from stockholder meetings, as well as feedback obtained through our stockholder engagement efforts,
when making future decisions regarding corporate governance matters.
Board of Director Meetings
The Board of Directors met six (6) times during fiscal year 2018. During fiscal year 2018, each director attended
at least 75% of the aggregate of the total number of meetings of the Board of Directors and the total number of
meetings held by all committees of the Board of Directors on which he or she served. The Company’s policy with
respect to directors’ attendance at the Annual Meeting is available on the Investor Relations portion of the
Company’s website at http://www.skyworksinc.com (see corporate governance guidelines). At the 2018 Annual
Meeting, each director then in office was in attendance, with the exception of Mr. Beebe.
Director Independence
Each year, the Board of Directors reviews the relationships that each director has with the Company and with
other parties. Only those directors who do not have any of the categorical relationships that preclude them from being
21
Proxy Statement Page 21
independent within the meaning of the applicable Listing Rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (the ‘‘Nasdaq
Rules’’) and who the Board of Directors affirmatively determines have no relationships that would interfere with the
exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director, are considered to be independent
directors. The Board of Directors has reviewed a number of factors to evaluate the independence of each of its
members. These factors include its members’ current and historic relationships with the Company and its competitors,
suppliers, and customers; their relationships with management and other directors; the relationships their current and
former employers have with the Company; and the relationships between the Company and other companies of which
a member of the Company’s Board of Directors is a director or executive officer. After evaluating these factors, the
Board of Directors has determined that a majority of the members of the Board of Directors, namely, Kevin L. Beebe,
Timothy R. Furey, Balakrishnan S. Iyer, Christine King, David J. McLachlan, David P. McGlade, Robert A.
Schriesheim, and Kimberly S. Stevenson, do not have any relationships that would interfere with the exercise of
independent judgment in carrying out their responsibilities as directors and that each such director is an independent
director of the Company within the meaning of applicable Nasdaq Rules.
Corporate Governance Guidelines
The Board of Directors has adopted corporate governance practices to help fulfill its responsibilities to the
stockholders in overseeing the work of management and the Company’s business results. These guidelines are
intended to ensure that the Board of Directors has the necessary authority and practices in place to review and
evaluate the Company’s business operations, as needed, and to make decisions that are independent of the Company’s
management. In addition, the guidelines are intended to align the interests of directors and management with those of
the Company’s stockholders. A copy of the Company’s corporate governance guidelines is available on the Investor
Relations portion of the Company’s website at http://www.skyworksinc.com.
In accordance with these corporate governance guidelines, independent members of the Board of Directors of
the Company met in executive session without management present four (4) times during fiscal year 2018.
Mr. McLachlan, the Lead Independent Director, served as presiding director for these meetings.
Stockholder Communications
Our stockholders may communicate directly with the Board of Directors as a whole or to individual directors by
letter addressed directly to such individual or individuals at the following address: c/o Skyworks Solutions, Inc.,
5221 California Avenue, Irvine, CA 92617, Attention: Secretary. The Company will forward to each director to whom
such communication is addressed, and to the Chairman of the Board in his capacity as representative of the entire
Board of Directors, any mail received at the Company’s corporate office to the address specified by such director and
the Chairman of the Board.
Code of Ethics
We have adopted a written code of business conduct and ethics that applies to our directors, officers, and
employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or
controller, or persons performing similar functions. We make available our code of business conduct and ethics
through our website at http://www.skyworksinc.com. We intend to disclose any amendments to, or waivers from, our
code of business conduct and ethics that are required to be publicly disclosed by posting any such amendment or
waivers on our website pursuant to SEC requirements and Nasdaq Rules.
Executive Officer and Director Stock Ownership Requirements
As described in detail below under ‘‘Compensation Discussion and Analysis,’’ we have adopted Executive Officer
and Director Stock Ownership programs that require our executive officers (including those Named Executive
Officers who are still currently serving as executive officers) and non-employee directors to hold a significant equity
interest in Skyworks with the objective of more closely aligning the interests of our executive officers and directors
with those of our stockholders. All of our Named Executive Officers and directors have met the stock ownership
guidelines as of the date hereof (with the exception of Ms. Stevenson, who is not required to comply with the
guidelines until the fifth anniversary of her appointment to the Board of Directors).
Page 22 Proxy Statement
22
Board Leadership Structure
Our Board of Directors selects the Company’s Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer in the manner
it determines to be in the best interests of the Company. In May 2014, our Board of Directors appointed Mr. Aldrich,
who had previously served as the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer, to serve as Chairman of the
Board and Chief Executive Officer. At that time, our Board of Directors also appointed Mr. McLachlan, the prior
Chairman of the Board and an independent director within the meaning of applicable Nasdaq Rules (see above under
‘‘Director Independence’’), as the Lead Independent Director. In May 2016, our Board of Directors appointed
Mr. Aldrich to serve as Chairman of the Board and Executive Chairman, and Mr. Griffin to serve as President and
Chief Executive Officer and as a director. Mr. Aldrich’s tenure as the Company’s Executive Chairman ended on
May 9, 2018, the date of the Company’s 2018 Annual Meeting. Mr. Aldrich continues to serve as Chairman of the
Board and, as noted above, is standing for reelection as a non-employee director at the Annual Meeting.
Mr. McLachlan will not stand for reelection at the Annual Meeting, and the Board of Directors intends to appoint a
new Lead Independent Director following the election of directors at the Annual Meeting.
The duties of the Lead Independent Director, as set forth in our corporate governance guidelines, include the
following:
• presiding at all meetings of the Board of Directors at which the Chairman of the Board is not present,
including executive sessions of the independent directors;
• calling meetings of the independent directors, as he deems appropriate, and assuring that the independent
directors meet independently at least twice each year;
• providing leadership to the Board of Directors if circumstances arise in which the Chairman of the Board may
be, or may be perceived to be, in conflict with the interests of the Company and its stockholders with regard to
a particular matter;
• facilitating communications and serving as a liaison, when necessary, between the independent directors and
the Chairman of the Board and/or the Chief Executive Officer;
• consulting with the Chairman of the Board in the preparation of the schedules, agendas, and information
provided to the Board of Directors for each meeting, and ensuring that there is sufficient time at each meeting
for discussion of all agenda items;
• retaining independent advisors on behalf of the Board of Directors as the Board of Directors or the
independent directors may deem necessary or appropriate; and
• being available for consultation and direct communication upon the reasonable request of major stockholders.
The Board believes our current leadership structure is appropriate and that the duties of the Lead Independent
Director appropriately and effectively complement the duties of the Chairman of the Board.
23
Proxy Statement Page 23
Committees of the Board of Directors
The Board of Directors has a standing Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee.
Audit Committee
We have established an Audit Committee consisting of the following individuals, each of whom the Board of
Directors has determined is ‘‘independent’’ within the meaning of applicable Nasdaq Rules and meets the criteria for
independence set forth in Rule 10A-3(b)(1) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the ‘‘Exchange
Act’’): Mr. Iyer (Chairman), Mr. Furey, Ms. King, Mr. McGlade, and Mr. McLachlan.
The primary responsibility of the Audit Committee is the oversight of the quality and integrity of the Company’s
financial statements, the Company’s internal financial and accounting processes, and the independent audit process.
Additionally, the Audit Committee has the responsibilities and authority necessary to comply with Rule 10A-3 under
the Exchange Act. The Audit Committee meets privately with the independent registered public accounting firm,
reviews their performance and independence from management, and has the sole authority to retain and dismiss the
independent registered public accounting firm. These and other aspects of the Audit Committee’s authority are more
particularly described in the Company’s Audit Committee Charter, which the Board of Directors adopted and is
reviewed annually by the committee and is available on the Investor Relations portion of our website at
http://www.skyworksinc.com.
The Audit Committee has adopted a formal policy concerning approval of audit and non-audit services to be
provided to the Company by its independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP. The policy requires that
all services provided by KPMG LLP, including audit services and permitted audit-related and non-audit services, be
preapproved by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee preapproved all audit and non-audit services provided
by KPMG LLP for fiscal year 2018. The Audit Committee met eight (8) times during fiscal year 2018.
Audit Committee Financial Expert
The Board of Directors has determined that each of Mr. Iyer (Chairman), Ms. King, Mr. McGlade,
Mr. McLachlan, and Mr. Schriesheim (who served on the Audit Committee until January 30, 2019) meets the
qualifications of an ‘‘audit committee financial expert’’ under SEC rules and the qualifications of ‘‘financial
sophistication’’ under the applicable Nasdaq Rules, and qualifies as ‘‘independent’’ as defined under the applicable
Nasdaq Rules.
Compensation Committee
We have established a Compensation Committee consisting of the following individuals, each of whom the Board
of Directors has determined is ‘‘independent’’ within the meaning of applicable Nasdaq Rules: Ms. King (Chairman),
Mr. McGlade, and Mr. Schriesheim. The Compensation Committee met six (6) times during fiscal year 2018. The
functions of the Compensation Committee include establishing the appropriate level of compensation, including short
and long-term incentive compensation of the Chief Executive Officer, all other executive officers, and any other
officers or employees who report directly to the Chief Executive Officer. The Compensation Committee also
administers Skyworks’ equity-based compensation plans. The Compensation Committee’s authority to grant equity
awards to the Company’s executive officers may not be delegated to the Company’s management or others. The
Board of Directors has adopted a written charter for the Compensation Committee, and it is available on the Investor
Relations portion of the Company’s website at http://www.skyworksinc.com.
The Compensation Committee has engaged Aon/Radford Consulting (‘‘Aon/Radford’’) to assist it in determining
the components and amounts of executive compensation. The consultant reports directly to the Compensation
Committee, through its Chairman, and the Compensation Committee retains the right to terminate or replace the
consultant at any time.
The process and procedures followed by the Compensation Committee in considering and determining executive
and director compensation are described below under ‘‘Compensation Discussion and Analysis.’’
Page 24 Proxy Statement
24
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
We have established a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee consisting of the following individuals,
each of whom the Board of Directors has determined is ‘‘independent’’ within the meaning of applicable Nasdaq
Rules: Mr. Beebe (Chairman), Mr. Furey, Mr. McLachlan, Mr. Schriesheim, and Ms. Stevenson. The Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee met three (3) times during fiscal year 2018. The Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee is responsible for evaluating and recommending individuals for election or reelection to the
Board of Directors and its committees, including any recommendations that may be submitted by stockholders, the
annual self-evaluations of the Board of Directors and its committees (which include assessments of individual
directors), and the evaluation and recommendation of the corporate governance policies. These and other aspects of
the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s authority are more particularly described in the Nominating
and Corporate Governance Committee Charter, which the Board of Directors adopted and is available on the
Investor Relations portion of the Company’s website at http://www.skyworksinc.com.
Director Nomination Procedures
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee evaluates director candidates in the context of the
overall composition and needs of the Board of Directors, with the objective of recommending a group that can best
manage the business and affairs of the Company and represent the interests of the Company’s stockholders using its
diversity of experience. The committee seeks directors who possess certain minimum qualifications, including the
following:
• A director must have substantial or significant business or professional experience or an understanding of
technology, finance, marketing, financial reporting, international business, or other disciplines relevant to the
business of the Company.
• A director (other than an employee-director) must be free from any relationship that, in the opinion of the
Board of Directors, would interfere with the exercise of his or her independent judgment as a member of the
Board of Directors or of a Board committee.
• The committee also considers the following qualities and skills, among others, in its selection of directors and
as candidates for appointment to the committees of the Board of Directors:
(cid:3) economic, technical, scientific, academic, financial, accounting, legal, marketing, or other expertise
applicable to the business of the Company;
(cid:3) leadership or substantial achievement in their particular fields;
(cid:3) demonstrated ability to exercise sound business judgment;
(cid:3) integrity and high moral and ethical character;
(cid:3) potential to contribute to the diversity of viewpoints, backgrounds, or experiences of the Board of
Directors as a whole;
(cid:3) capacity and desire to represent the balanced, best interests of the Company as a whole and not
primarily a special interest group or constituency;
(cid:3) ability to work well with others;
(cid:3) high degree of interest in the business of the Company;
(cid:3) dedication to the success of the Company;
(cid:3) commitment to the responsibilities of a director; and
(cid:3) international business or professional experience.
25
Proxy Statement Page 25
The committee believes that our Board of Directors, taken as a whole, should embody a diverse set of skills,
experiences, and backgrounds in order to better inform its decisions. As noted above in ‘‘Election of Directors—
Nominees for Election,’’ the committee considers age, tenure, gender, race, and ethnicity, in addition to business
experience and other specific areas of focus or expertise, in its holistic approach to assessing and identifying director
nominees. With respect to the recent director search that culminated with the appointment of Ms. Stevenson in July
2018, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee instructed its retained search firm to include candidates
reflecting gender and ethnic diversity in the pool of potential director nominees to be considered by the committee.
The committee will also take into account the fact that a majority of the Board of Directors must meet the
independence requirements of the applicable Nasdaq Rules. The Company expects that a director’s existing and
future commitments will not materially interfere with such director’s obligations to the Company. For candidates who
are incumbent directors, the committee considers each director’s past attendance at meetings and participation in and
contributions to the activities of the Board of Directors. The committee identifies candidates for director nominees in
consultation with the Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Chairman of the Board, through the use of
search firms or other advisors or through such other methods as the committee deems to be helpful to identify
candidates. Once candidates have been identified, the committee confirms that the candidates meet all of the
minimum qualifications for director nominees set forth above through interviews, background checks, or any other
means that the committee deems to be helpful in the evaluation process. The committee then meets to discuss and
evaluate the qualities and skills of each candidate, both on an individual basis and taking into account the overall
composition and needs of the Board of Directors. Based on the results of the evaluation process, the committee
recommends candidates for director nominees for election to the Board of Directors.
Stockholder Nominees
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider director candidates recommended by
stockholders provided such stockholders follow the procedures set forth below. The committee does not intend to
alter the manner in which it evaluates candidates, including the criteria set forth above, based on whether the
candidate was recommended by a stockholder or otherwise. Stockholders who wish to nominate director candidates
for election at the 2020 Annual Meeting, but who are not to be included in the Company’s proxy materials pursuant to
the proxy access provisions in our By-laws, may do so in accordance with the provisions of our By-laws by submitting a
written recommendation to the Secretary of the Company at the address below no earlier than the close of business on
January 9, 2020, and no later than the close of business on February 8, 2020. In the event that the 2020 Annual
Meeting is held more than thirty (30) days before or after the first anniversary of the Company’s 2019 Annual
Meeting, then the required notice must be delivered in writing to the Secretary of the Company at the address below
no earlier than 120 days prior to the date of the 2020 Annual Meeting and no later than the later of 90 days prior to
the 2020 Annual Meeting or the 10th day following the day on which the public announcement of the date of the 2020
Annual Meeting is first made by the Company. For nominees for election to the Board of Directors proposed by
stockholders to be considered, the recommendation for nomination must be in writing and must include the following
information:
• name of the stockholder, whether an entity or an individual, making the recommendation;
• a written statement disclosing such stockholder’s beneficial ownership of the Company’s capital stock;
• name of the individual recommended for consideration as a director nominee;
• a written statement from the stockholder making the recommendation stating why such recommended
candidate would be able to fulfill the duties of a director;
• a written statement from the stockholder making the recommendation stating how the recommended
candidate meets the independence requirements established by the SEC and the applicable Nasdaq Rules;
• a written statement disclosing the recommended candidate’s beneficial ownership of the Company’s capital
stock; and
• a written statement disclosing relationships between the recommended candidate and the Company that may
constitute a conflict of interest.
Page 26 Proxy Statement
26
A stockholder (or a group of up to twenty stockholders) who has owned at least three percent of the Company’s
outstanding shares of common stock continuously for at least three years, and has complied with the other
requirements in the Company’s By-laws, may nominate and include in the Company’s proxy materials a number of
director nominees up to the greater of two individuals or 20% of the Board of Directors. Written notice of a proxy
access nomination for inclusion in our proxy statement for the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders must be
submitted to the Secretary of the Company at the address below no earlier than the open of business on December 10,
2019, and no later than the close of business on January 9, 2020. In the event that the 2020 Annual Meeting is held
more than thirty (30) days before, or more than sixty (60) days after, the first anniversary of the Company’s 2019
Annual Meeting, then the required notice must be delivered in writing to the Secretary of the Company at the address
below no earlier than 150 days prior to the date of the 2020 Annual Meeting and no later than the later of 120 days
prior to the 2020 Annual Meeting or the 10th day following the day on which the public announcement of the date of
the 2020 Annual Meeting is first made by the Company.
Written notice of proxy access nominations and written recommendations for nomination may be sent to the
General Counsel and Secretary of the Company via U.S. mail or expedited delivery service to Skyworks
Solutions, Inc., 5221 California Avenue, Irvine, California 92617.
Role of the Board of Directors in Risk Oversight
Our Board of Directors oversees our risk management processes directly and through its committees. Our
management team is responsible for risk management on a day-to-day basis. The role of our Board of Directors and
its committees is to oversee the risk management activities of our management team. They fulfill this duty by
discussing with management the policies and practices utilized by management in assessing and managing risks and
providing input on those policies and practices. In general, our Board of Directors oversees risk management activities
relating to business strategy, capital allocation, organizational structure, certain operational risks, and acquisitions;
our Audit Committee oversees risk management activities related to financial controls, legal and compliance risks,
and cybersecurity risk; our Compensation Committee oversees risk management activities relating to our
compensation policies and practices as well as management succession planning; and our Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee oversees risk management activities relating to Board composition. Each committee reports
to the Board of Directors on a regular basis, including reports with respect to the committee’s risk oversight activities
as appropriate. For example, the Board of Directors periodically reviews and approves the executive succession plan
in consultation with the Compensation Committee and the Chief Executive Officer. In addition, since risk issues often
overlap, committees from time to time request that the Board of Directors discuss particular risks.
Our Compensation Committee does not believe that any risks arising from our employee compensation policies
and practices are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our company. Our Compensation Committee
believes that any such risks are mitigated by:
• The multiple elements of our compensation packages, including base salary, our annual short-term incentive
compensation plan and (for our executive officers and other key employees) equity awards that vest (or are
issuable) over multiple years and are intended to motivate employees to take a long-term view of our business.
• The structure of our short-term incentive compensation plan (described in greater detail in this Proxy
Statement under ‘‘Compensation Discussion and Analysis’’), which is based on (i) a number of different
financial and operating performance metrics to avoid employees placing undue emphasis on any particular
performance metric at the expense of other aspects of our business, and (ii) performance targets that we
believe are appropriately aggressive yet will not require undue risk-taking to achieve. Further, the structure of
the short-term incentive compensation plan aids in driving sustained long-term financial performance as the
goals and targets from the prior year’s plan are significant factors used in determining goals for the current
year’s plan.
27
Proxy Statement Page 27
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors currently consists of Ms. King (Chairman),
Mr. McGlade, and Mr. Schriesheim. During fiscal year 2018, the Compensation Committee consisted of Ms. King
(Chairman), Mr. Beebe, Mr. Furey, and Mr. McGlade. No member of this committee was at any time during fiscal
year 2018 an officer or employee of the Company, was formerly an officer of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, or
had any employment relationship with the Company or any of its subsidiaries. No executive officer of the Company
has served as a director or member of the compensation committee (or other committee serving an equivalent
function) of any other entity, one of whose executive officers served as a director of or member of the Compensation
Committee.
Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions
Other than compensation agreements and other arrangements described below under ‘‘Information About
Executive and Director Compensation,’’ since September 29, 2017, there has not been a transaction or series of related
transactions to which the Company was or is a party involving an amount in excess of $120,000 and in which any
director, executive officer, holder of more than five percent (5%) of any class of our voting securities, or any member
of the immediate family of any of the foregoing persons, had or will have a direct or indirect material interest. In
January 2008, the Board of Directors adopted a written related person transaction approval policy, which was
amended in November 2018, and which sets forth the Company’s policies and procedures for the review, approval or
ratification of any transaction required to be reported in its filings with the SEC. The Company’s policy with regard to
related person transactions is that all related person transactions between the Company and any related person (as
defined in Item 404 of Regulation S-K) or their affiliates, in which the amount involved is equal to or greater than
$120,000, be reviewed by the Company’s General Counsel and approved by the Audit Committee. In addition, the
Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics requires that employees discuss with the Company’s Compliance
Officer any significant relationship (or transaction) that might raise doubt about such employee’s ability to act in the
best interest of the Company.
Page 28 Proxy Statement
28
Proposal 2:
Ratification of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Audit Committee has selected KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm
for fiscal year 2019 and has further directed that management submit the selection of the independent registered
public accounting firm for ratification by the stockholders at the Annual Meeting. KPMG LLP was the independent
registered public accounting firm for the Company for fiscal year 2018, and has been the independent registered
public accounting firm for the Company and its predecessor, Alpha Industries, Inc., since 1975. We are asking the
stockholders to ratify the selection of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm
for fiscal year 2019.
Representatives of KPMG LLP are expected to attend the Annual Meeting. They will have an opportunity to
make a statement if they desire to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate stockholder questions.
Stockholder ratification of the selection of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public
accounting firm is not required by the Company’s By-laws or other applicable legal requirements. However, the Audit
Committee is submitting the selection of KPMG LLP to the stockholders for ratification as a matter of good
corporate practice. The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the
Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on such matter at the Annual Meeting is required to approve the selection of
KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. In the event stockholders fail to ratify
the appointment, the Audit Committee may reconsider this appointment. Even if the appointment is ratified, the
Audit Committee, in its discretion, may direct the appointment of a different independent registered public
accounting firm at any time during the year if the Audit Committee determines that such a change would be in the
Company’s and stockholders’ best interests.
Audit Fees
KPMG LLP provided audit services to the Company consisting of the annual audit of the Company’s 2018
consolidated financial statements contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and reviews of the
financial statements contained in the Company’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for fiscal year 2018. The following
table summarizes the fees of KPMG LLP billed to the Company for the last two fiscal years.
Fee Category
Audit Fees(1)
Audit-Related Fees
Tax Fees(2)
All Other Fees(3)
Total Fees
Fiscal Year
2018 ($)
2,479,090
—
240,500
38,500
2,758,090
% of
Total (%)
89.9
Fiscal Year
2017 ($)
1,741,700
% of
Total (%)
93.7
—
8.7
1.4
100
—
67,000
49,560
1,858,260
—
3.6
2.7
100
(1) Audit fees consist of fees for the audit of our annual financial statements, review of the interim financial
statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, statutory audits and related filings in various foreign
locations and audit procedures related to acquisition activity during fiscal years 2018 and 2017. Fiscal year 2018
and 2017 audit fees included fees for services incurred in connection with rendering an opinion under Section 404
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
(2) Tax fees consist of fees for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning services. Tax compliance services, which
primarily relate to the review of our U.S. tax returns and certain trade and customs forms, accounted for $230,000
and $57,000 of the total tax fees for fiscal years 2018 and 2017, respectively.
29
Proxy Statement Page 29
(3) All other fees for fiscal years 2018 and 2017 relate to fees incurred for conflict mineral reporting compliance and
licenses to accounting and research software.
In 2003, the Audit Committee adopted a formal policy concerning approval of audit and non-audit services to be
provided to the Company by its independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP. The policy requires that
all services provided by KPMG LLP, including audit services and permitted audit-related and non-audit services, be
preapproved by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee preapproved all audit and non-audit services provided
by KPMG LLP during fiscal year 2018 and our fiscal year ended September 29, 2017 (‘‘fiscal year 2017’’).
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE ‘‘FOR’’
THE RATIFICATION OF THE SELECTION OF KPMG LLP
AS THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM OF THE COMPANY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2019
Page 30 Proxy Statement
30
Report of the Audit Committee
The Audit Committee of Skyworks’ Board of Directors is responsible for providing independent, objective
oversight of Skyworks’ accounting functions and internal controls. During fiscal year 2018, the Audit Committee was
composed of four directors, each of whom is independent within the meaning of applicable Nasdaq Rules and meets
the criteria for independence set forth in Rule 10A-3(b)(1) under the Exchange Act. The Audit Committee operates
under a written charter approved by the Board of Directors.
Management is responsible for the Company’s internal control and financial reporting process. The Company’s
independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for performing an independent audit of Skyworks’
consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and for issuing a report
concerning such financial statements. The Audit Committee’s responsibility is to monitor and oversee these processes.
In connection with these responsibilities, the Audit Committee met with management and representatives of
KPMG LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, and reviewed and discussed the audited
financial statements for fiscal year 2018, results of the internal and external audit examinations, evaluations of the
Company’s internal controls, and the overall quality of Skyworks’ financial reporting. The Audit Committee also
discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed by Auditing
Standard No. 1301, ‘‘Communications with Audit Committees,’’ issued by the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board. In addition, the Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from its independent
registered public accounting firm required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence
and has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the independent registered public
accounting firm’s independence from the Company and its management, including the matters in the written
disclosures and letter that were received by the committee from such firm.
Based upon the Audit Committee’s review and discussions described above, the Audit Committee recommended
that the Board of Directors include the audited consolidated financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for fiscal year 2018, as filed with the SEC.
THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
Kevin L. Beebe*
Balakrishnan S. Iyer
David J. McLachlan
Robert A. Schriesheim*, Chairman
* No longer serving on the Audit Committee
31
Proxy Statement Page 31
Proposal 3:
Advisory Vote on the Compensation of Our
Named Executive Officers (‘‘Say-on-Pay Vote’’)
We are providing our stockholders with the opportunity to vote to approve, on a non-binding basis, the
compensation of our Named Executive Officers as described below under ‘‘Information About Executive and Director
Compensation’’ pursuant to Section 14A of the Exchange Act. At our 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders,
approximately 93% of the votes cast by our stockholders were in favor of the compensation of the Company’s named
executive officers as disclosed in the proxy statement delivered to our stockholders in connection with the 2018
Annual Meeting.
As we describe below under ‘‘Compensation Discussion and Analysis,’’ our executive compensation program
embodies a pay-for-performance philosophy that supports our business strategy and aligns the interests of our
executives with our stockholders. In addition, our Board of Directors believes that the Company’s financial
performance over the last fiscal year demonstrates that our executive compensation program was designed
appropriately and is working effectively to support long-term value creation.
Our Board of Directors is asking stockholders to approve a non-binding advisory vote on the following resolution:
RESOLVED, that the Company’s stockholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to the
Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities
and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables, and
any related material disclosed in this Proxy Statement.
As an advisory vote, this proposal is not binding and will not overrule any decision by the Company or the Board
of Directors (or any committee thereof), nor will it create or imply any change or addition to the fiduciary duties of
the Company or the Board of Directors (or any committee thereof). However, our Compensation Committee and
Board of Directors value the opinions expressed by our stockholders in their vote on this proposal and will consider
the outcome of the vote when making future compensation decisions for Named Executive Officers. The next
non-binding say-on-pay vote is scheduled to be held at our 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE
TO APPROVE THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
BY VOTING ‘‘FOR’’ PROPOSAL 3
Page 32 Proxy Statement
32
Information About Executive and Director Compensation
Summary and Highlights
Financial Performance
• For fiscal year 2018, we achieved record net revenue of approximately $3.9 billion, operating margin of
approximately 34% on a GAAP basis (approximately 38% on a non-GAAP basis), and diluted earnings per
share of $5.01 on a GAAP basis ($7.22 on a non-GAAP basis).1
• During fiscal year 2018, we returned approximately $1.0 billion to stockholders through repurchasing
7.7 million shares of our common stock for $760 million and through payments of $243 million in cash
dividends.
• Total stockholder return (‘‘TSR’’) for the five-year period ending September 28, 2018, was 287%, compared to
a weighted average TSR of 202% for the companies in the S&P 500 Semiconductors Index and a weighted
average TSR of 91% for the companies in the S&P 500 Index.
Compensation Program Alignment with Long-Term Interests of Stockholders
• We emphasize pay-for-performance and tie a significant amount of our Named Executive Officers’ annual
compensation to our performance in the form of incentive-based compensation, with the majority being in
equity-based compensation. We believe that through the combination of our equity-based incentive
compensation program and executive stock ownership guidelines, the interests of our executives are strongly
aligned with those of our long-term stockholders—namely, increasing stockholder value over time.
• The charts below show the target total direct compensation mix for fiscal year 2018 for our Chief Executive
Officer and the average for the other Named Executive Officers. The target total direct compensation mix for
fiscal year 2018 reflects actual salary, target short-term incentive award, and the grant date fair value of
performance share and restricted stock unit awards.
Chief Executive Officer
Other Named Executive Officers
15%
10%
13%
11%
Base Salary
Short-term Incentive
Long-term
Stock-based Incentive
75%
76%
20MAR201916490567
1
Please see table on page 69 for a full reconciliation of non-GAAP results to GAAP results.
33
Proxy Statement Page 33
• We provide short-term incentive compensation to motivate executives to achieve key near-term (i.e., a year or
less) financial and/or operational objectives. We provide longer-term equity-based compensation in the form of
performance share awards and restricted stock unit awards to incentivize our executive officers to achieve goals
each year that we believe will result in significant increases in stockholder value over the longer term, thereby
aligning their interests with those of our stockholders. Shares are received under performance share awards
only upon satisfaction of ‘‘performance’’ and ‘‘continued employment’’ conditions (i.e., to receive all shares
earned based on actual performance, the executive would typically need to remain employed for three years
following the grant of a performance share award).
• The Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors, with assistance from its independent compensation
consultant, annually reviews our executive compensation program to ensure that it is competitive with the
companies in our industry with which we compete for executive talent. We generally target the median of our
comparison group for our base salary and short-term incentive compensation levels. For fiscal year 2018, we
granted equity-based incentive awards with a target incentive level at approximately the median of our
comparison group, with the opportunity to earn above the target incentive levels based on performance. We
feel that this level of executive compensation, with its emphasis on long-term results, alignment with
stockholder interests, and long-term retention, enables us to attract and retain the executive talent necessary to
meet our business objectives.
Corporate Governance and Compensation Best Practices
• As part of its commitment to strong corporate governance and best practices, our Compensation Committee
has engaged an independent compensation consultant, Aon/Radford, to perform an annual comprehensive
analysis of our executive compensation practices and pay levels, using analytical tools such as market data, tally
sheets, compensation history, and walk-away analysis for each executive.
• We have adopted Executive Officer and Director Stock Ownership programs that require our executive officers
and non-employee directors to hold a significant equity interest in the Company with the objective of more
closely aligning the interests of our executive officers and directors with those of our stockholders.
• We prohibit our directors, officers, and employees from (a) hedging or otherwise offsetting any decrease in the
market value of the Company securities held by such individuals, or (b) engaging in any short-term, speculative
securities transactions with regard to Company securities, including but not limited to pledging securities,
purchasing securities on margin, engaging in short sales, or buying or selling put or call options;
• Equity awards granted to our Named Executive Officers under the 2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan are not
subject to automatic accelerated vesting solely upon a change in control of the Company.
• None of the Named Executive Officers is entitled to any future excise tax gross-up payment in connection with
a change in control of the Company.
• Our non-employee directors are compensated with a combination of cash and equity awards, with the majority
of compensation provided in the form of equity awards. The Compensation Committee, with input from Aon/
Radford, reviews the total compensation of our non-employee directors biannually and analyzes the
competitiveness of our compensation program for non-employee directors against the peer group used to
benchmark executive compensation, with the goal of establishing non-employee director compensation that is
similar to, and competitive with, the compensation of non-employee directors at peer companies in the
semiconductor industry.
Page 34 Proxy Statement
34
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis section discusses the compensation policies and programs for our
Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer, our former Executive Chairman, and our three next most highly
paid executive officers during fiscal year 2018 as determined under the rules of the SEC. We refer to this group of
executive officers as our ‘‘Named Executive Officers.’’ For fiscal year 2018, our Named Executive Officers were:
• Liam K. Griffin, President and Chief Executive Officer;
• Kris Sennesael, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer;
• Carlos S. Bori, Senior Vice President, Sales and Marketing;
• Peter L. Gammel, Chief Technology Officer;
• Robert J. Terry, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary; and
• David J. Aldrich, Former Executive Chairman (retired as Executive Chairman on May 9, 2018).
Approach for Determining Form and Amounts of Compensation
The Compensation Committee, which is composed solely of independent directors within the meaning of
applicable Nasdaq Rules, outside directors within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code
(‘‘IRC’’) (solely for purposes of administering any equity awards that may qualify as grandfathered performance-based
compensation), and non-employee directors within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act, is responsible
for determining all components and amounts of compensation to be paid to our Named Executive Officers, as well as
any other executive officers or employees who report directly to the Chief Executive Officer. The Compensation
Committee sets compensation for the Named Executive Officers, including base salary, short-term incentives, and
long-term stock-based incentives, at levels generally intended to be competitive with the compensation of comparable
executives in semiconductor companies with which the Company competes for executive talent.
Compensation Program Objectives
The objectives of our executive compensation program are to attract, retain and motivate highly qualified
executives to operate our business, and to link the compensation of those executives to improvements in the
Company’s financial performance and increases in stockholder value. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee’s
goals in establishing our executive compensation program include:
• ensuring that our executive compensation program is competitive with a group of companies in the
semiconductor industry with which we compete for executive talent;
• providing a base salary that serves as the foundation of a compensation package that attracts and retains the
executive talent needed to achieve our business objectives;
• providing short-term variable compensation that motivates executives and rewards them for achieving
Company financial performance targets;
• providing long-term stock-based compensation that aligns the interest of our executives with stockholders by
rewarding them for long-term increases in stockholder value; and
• ensuring that our executive compensation program is perceived as fundamentally fair to all of our employees.
Retention of Compensation Consultant
The Compensation Committee has engaged Aon/Radford to assist in determining the components and amount of
executive compensation. Aon/Radford reports directly to the Compensation Committee, through its chairman, and
the Compensation Committee retains the right to terminate or replace the consultant at any time. The consultant
advises the Compensation Committee on such compensation matters as are requested by the Compensation
35
Proxy Statement Page 35
Committee. The Compensation Committee considers the consultant’s advice on such matters in addition to any other
information or factors it considers relevant in making its compensation determinations. In fiscal year 2018, Aon/
Radford received $246,580 for survey data and compensation consulting services to the Compensation Committee.
The Compensation Committee has considered the relationships that Aon/Radford has with the Company, the
members of the Compensation Committee and our executive officers, as well as the policies that Aon/Radford has in
place to maintain its independence and objectivity, and has determined that Aon/Radford’s work for the
Compensation Committee has not raised any conflicts of interest. Company management has separately engaged Aon
Risk Solutions, an affiliate of Aon/Radford, for risk management and insurance brokerage services. The Company
paid $420,977 to Aon Risk Solutions in fiscal year 2018 for those services. Additionally, Company management has
engaged certain affiliates of Aon/Radford in various jurisdictions for consulting and brokerage services unrelated to
executive compensation and benefits, for which the Company paid a total of $77,837 in fiscal year 2018. The
Company’s management did not seek the Compensation Committee’s approval for such engagements with affiliates of
Aon/Radford.
Role of Chief Executive Officer
The Compensation Committee also considers the recommendations of the Chief Executive Officer regarding the
compensation of the other Named Executive Officers and each of his other direct reports. These recommendations
include an assessment of each individual’s responsibilities, experience, performance and contribution to the
Company’s performance, and also generally take into account internal factors such as scope of role and level in the
organization, in addition to external factors such as the current environment for attracting and retaining executives.
Establishment of Comparator Group Data
In determining compensation for each of the Named Executive Officers, the committee utilizes ‘‘Comparator
Group’’ data for each position. For fiscal year 2018, the Compensation Committee approved Comparator Group data
consisting of a 50/50 blend of (i) Aon/Radford survey data of 11 semiconductor companies (where sufficient data was
not available in the Aon/Radford semiconductor survey data for a given executive position, the Comparator Group
data also included survey data regarding high-technology companies), and (ii) the ‘‘peer’’ group data for 14 publicly
traded semiconductor companies with which the Company competes for executive talent:
*Advanced Micro Devices
*Analog Devices
*Applied Materials
*Broadcom Limited
*KLA-Tencor
*Lam Research
*Maxim Integrated Products
*Microchip Technology
*Micron Technology
*NVIDIA
*ON Semiconductor
*Qorvo
*Texas Instruments
*Xilinx
Use of Comparator Group Data
The Compensation Committee annually compares the components and amounts of compensation that we
provide to our Chief Executive Officer and other Named Executive Officers with the components and amounts of
compensation provided to their counterparts in the Comparator Group and uses this comparison data as a guideline
in its review and determination of base salaries, short-term incentives, and long-term stock-based compensation
awards, as discussed in further detail below under ‘‘Components of Compensation.’’ In addition, in setting fiscal year
2018 compensation, the Compensation Committee sought and received input from Aon/Radford regarding the base
salaries for the Chief Executive Officer and each of the other executive officers, the incentive targets relating to the
short-term incentive program for executive officers, and the individual stock-based compensation awards for executive
officers, as well as the related vesting schedules.
After reviewing the data and considering the input, the Compensation Committee established (and the full Board
of Directors was advised of) the base salary, short-term incentive target, and long-term stock-based compensation
award for each Named Executive Officer. In establishing individual compensation, the Compensation Committee also
Page 36 Proxy Statement
36
considered the input of the Chief Executive Officer, as well as the individual experience and performance of each
executive.
In determining the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer for fiscal year 2018, the Compensation
Committee focused on (i) competitive levels of compensation for chief executive officers who are leading a company
of similar size and complexity, (ii) the importance of retaining a chief executive officer with the strategic, financial,
and leadership skills necessary to ensure our continued growth and success, (iii) our Chief Executive Officer’s role
relative to the other Named Executive Officers, (iv) input from the full Board of Directors on our Chief Executive
Officer’s performance, and (v) the length of our Chief Executive Officer’s service to the Company. Aon/Radford
advised the Compensation Committee that the base salary, annual performance targets, short-term incentive target
opportunity, and equity-based compensation established by the Compensation Committee for fiscal year 2018 were
competitive for chief executive officers leading companies of similar size and complexity in the semiconductor
industry. Our Chief Executive Officer was not present during the voting or deliberations of the Compensation
Committee concerning his compensation. As stated above, however, the Compensation Committee did consider the
recommendations of the Chief Executive Officer regarding the compensation of the other Named Executive Officers
and each of his other direct reports.
Response to Stockholder Vote on Executive Compensation at 2018 Annual Meeting
At our 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, approximately 93% of the votes cast approved the compensation of
the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed in the proxy statement delivered to our stockholders in
connection with the 2018 Annual Meeting. We understood this to mean that stockholders generally approved of our
compensation policies and determinations in 2018. However, the Compensation Committee still undertook a review
of our compensation policies and determinations following the 2018 Annual Meeting with the assistance of Aon/
Radford. After this review and consideration of evolving best practices in executive compensation by public companies
generally, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, we determined not to make any significant
changes to our executive compensation decisions and policies. The Compensation Committee periodically reviews the
goals we would like to achieve through our executive compensation practices and explores ways to modify those
practices to either achieve new goals or to enhance our ability to achieve existing goals.
Components of Compensation
The key elements of compensation for our Named Executive Officers are base salary, short-term incentives,
long-term stock-based incentives, 401(k) plan retirement benefits, medical, dental, vision, life and disability insurance,
and financial planning benefits. Consistent with our objective of ensuring that executive compensation is perceived as
fair to all employees, the Named Executive Officers do not receive any retirement benefits beyond those generally
available to our benefits-eligible employees, and we do not provide medical, dental, vision, or other insurance benefits
to Named Executive Officers that are different from those offered to other benefits-eligible employees.
Base Salary
Base salaries provide our executive officers with a degree of financial certainty and stability. The Compensation
Committee determines a competitive base salary for each executive officer using the Comparator Group data and
input provided by Aon/Radford. Based on these factors, base salaries of the Named Executive Officers for fiscal year
2018 were generally targeted at the Comparator Group median, with consideration given to role, responsibility,
performance and length of service. The Compensation Committee did not increase, nor evaluate, the base salary for
Mr. Aldrich for fiscal year 2018, because his base salary had been established in May 2016 at the time of his
appointment as Executive Chairman. The base salary for fiscal year 2018 for each remaining Named Executive Officer
increased on average 7.85% from the Named Executive Officer’s base salary in fiscal year 2017 as a result of market-
based salary adjustments recommended by Aon/Radford, with increases ranging from 3.1% to 11.9%, which included
increases related to the promotions of Messrs. Bori and Terry to Senior Vice President.
37
Proxy Statement Page 37
Short-Term Incentives
Our short-term incentive compensation plan for executive officers is established annually by the Compensation
Committee. For fiscal year 2018, the Compensation Committee adopted the Fiscal Year 2018 Executive Incentive Plan
(the ‘‘Incentive Plan’’). The Incentive Plan established short-term incentive awards for fiscal year 2018 for certain
officers of the Company, including the Named Executive Officers, based on the Company’s achievement of certain
corporate performance goals established for fiscal year 2018. Short-term incentive compensation is intended to
motivate and reward executives by tying a significant portion of their total compensation to the Company’s
achievement of pre-established performance goals that are generally short-term (i.e., one year or less). Pursuant to the
Incentive Plan, the Compensation Committee sets a range of short-term incentive compensation that can be earned by
each executive officer based on the Comparator Group data, which is expressed as a percentage of the executive
officer’s base salary and which corresponds to the level of achievement of the performance goals. The low end of that
range, referred to as the ‘‘threshold’’ percentage, is equal to the amount of compensation payable to the executive if
the level of achievement of each performance goal applicable to the executive was at the minimum set by the
Compensation Committee to be eligible to receive a payment for that goal under the Incentive Plan (referred to as the
‘‘threshold’’ level). At the threshold payout level, the short-term incentive compensation was designed to result in a
payout less than the median short-term incentive compensation of the Comparator Group. The middle of the range,
referred to as the ‘‘target’’ percentage, is equal to the amount of short-term incentive compensation payable to the
executive if the level of achievement of each performance goal applicable to the executive met the expectations set by
the Compensation Committee (referred to as the ‘‘target’’ level). Achievement of all performance goals at the
‘‘target’’ level would result in a short-term incentive compensation payout equal to the ‘‘target’’ percentage, which is
designed to be the median short-term incentive compensation of the Comparator Group. The high end of the range,
referred to as the ‘‘maximum’’ percentage, is equal to the amount of compensation payable to the executive if the level
of achievement of each performance goal applicable to the executive reached the high-end target set by the
Compensation Committee for such goal (referred to as the ‘‘maximum’’ level). Achievement of all performance goals
at the ‘‘maximum’’ level would result in a short-term incentive compensation payout at the ‘‘maximum’’ percentage,
which is designed to be above the median short-term incentive compensation of the Comparator Group. Absent an
exercise of discretion by the Compensation Committee, the total short-term incentive compensation paid to each
executive would not exceed the ‘‘maximum’’ percentage and, in the event that the level of achievement of all
performance goals was below the ‘‘threshold’’ level, no short-term incentive compensation payment would be made to
the executive. The following table shows the range of short-term incentive compensation that each Named Executive
Officer could earn in fiscal year 2018 as a percentage of such executive officer’s annual base salary.
Chief Executive Officer and Executive Chairman
Chief Financial Officer
Other Executive Officers
Threshold Target Maximum
320%
160%
80%
45%
35%
90%
70%
180%
140%
The actual total amount of short-term incentive compensation payable to an executive depends on the level of
achievement of each performance goal assigned to the executive. In November 2017, the Compensation Committee
established performance goals for fiscal year 2018 based on achieving certain revenue and non-GAAP earnings per
share (‘‘EPS’’) performance metrics. Each of the performance goals was weighted equally (50% each) toward each
Named Executive Officer’s payment under the Incentive Plan. In January 2018, the Compensation Committee
amended the performance goals under the Incentive Plan to provide that the portion of the incentive awards under
the Incentive Plan that previously was attainable based on the Company’s achievement against a non-GAAP EPS
performance metric would instead be attainable based on the Company’s achievement against a non-GAAP operating
income performance metric. The non-GAAP operating income performance metric had been established by the
Compensation Committee in November 2017, concurrently with the non-GAAP EPS performance metric. The
Compensation Committee approved the change in metrics in light of the favorable impact on the Company’s
non-GAAP EPS for fiscal year 2018 that was expected as a result of tax legislation signed into law on December 22,
2017 (the ‘‘Tax Act’’), as well as the potential favorable impact on non-GAAP EPS of the Company’s new stock
repurchase program adopted in January 2018. At the time of the change in performance metrics in January 2018, the
Compensation Committee believed this change maintained the original rigor of the performance incentive objectives
Page 38 Proxy Statement
38
of the Incentive Plan and negated a potential windfall attributable to the Tax Act changes or to repurchase activity.
The non-GAAP operating income performance goal is based on the Company’s actual non-GAAP operating income,
which it calculates by excluding from GAAP operating income share-based compensation expense, acquisition-related
expenses, amortization of intangibles, restructuring-related charges, and litigation settlement gains, losses, and
expenses.
The Compensation Committee determines with respect to each performance goal the ‘‘threshold,’’ ‘‘target,’’ and
‘‘maximum’’ levels of achievement, which correspond to the matching descriptions set forth above. For Company
performance goals, the levels of achievement will be consistent across the executives to which such goals apply.
Following the end of the fiscal year, the Compensation Committee determines the total amount of short-term
incentive compensation payable to each executive for such period by comparing the actual level of achievement of
each performance goal assigned to such executive against the ‘‘threshold,’’ ‘‘target,’’ and ‘‘maximum’’ levels of
achievement that it set for that performance goal. The Compensation Committee determines the amount of
short-term incentive compensation the executive is eligible to receive with respect to each performance goal as
follows:
• If the level of achievement for the performance goal falls below the ‘‘threshold’’ level, then the executive will
not earn any short-term incentive compensation with respect to that performance goal (absent an exercise of
discretion by the Compensation Committee).
• If the level of achievement for the performance goal is equal to the ‘‘threshold,’’ ‘‘target,’’ or ‘‘maximum’’ level,
then the executive earns the product obtained by multiplying (i) the ‘‘threshold,’’ ‘‘target,’’ or ‘‘maximum’’
percentage, as applicable, by (ii) the executive’s base salary during the fiscal year, by (iii) the weighting assigned
to that performance goal.
• If the level of achievement for the performance goal falls in between either the ‘‘threshold’’ and ‘‘target’’ levels
or the ‘‘target’’ and ‘‘maximum’’ levels, the executive would earn short-term incentive compensation equal to
the short-term incentive compensation payable at the ‘‘threshold’’ or ‘‘target’’ level, as applicable, plus a pro
rata amount of the difference between the short-term incentive compensation payable for the performance
goal at the ‘‘threshold’’ and ‘‘target’’ levels or the ‘‘target’’ and ‘‘maximum’’ levels, as applicable.
• Absent an exercise of discretion by the Compensation Committee, if the level of achievement for the
performance goal exceeds the ‘‘maximum’’ level, the executive will only earn the amount payable for
achievement at the ‘‘maximum’’ level.
Each executive’s short-term incentive compensation under the Incentive Plan is calculated by evaluating
achievement of each performance goal individually, determining the portion of the total eligible bonus earned with
respect to each such performance goal, and totaling the resulting amounts.
The target level performance goals established by the Compensation Committee under the Incentive Plan are
based on the Company’s historical operating results and growth rates as well as the Company’s expected future results
and are designed to require significant effort and operational success on the part of our executives and the Company.
The maximum level performance goals established by the Compensation Committee have historically been difficult to
achieve and are designed to represent outstanding performance that the Compensation Committee believes should be
rewarded. Typically, financial performance goals are set with the expectation that the ‘‘target’’ level will be around the
consensus analyst estimates for the Company.
The Incentive Plan stipulated that all payouts to executives under the Incentive Plan were conditioned upon the
Company achieving a nominal performance goal based on non-GAAP operating income (after accounting for any
incentive award payments, including those to be made under the Incentive Plan). The nominal non-GAAP operating
income performance goal is based on the Company’s actual non-GAAP operating income, which it calculates as
described above. The Compensation Committee retains the discretion, based on the recommendation of the Chief
Executive Officer, to make payments even if the threshold performance metrics are not met or to make payments in
excess of the maximum level if the Company’s performance exceeds the maximum metrics. The Compensation
39
Proxy Statement Page 39
Committee believes it is appropriate to retain this discretion in order to make short-term incentive compensation
awards in extraordinary circumstances.
The Company’s revenue and non-GAAP operating income achieved in fiscal year 2018, at 93.3% and 85.1% of
the target level of performance, respectively, resulted in a short-term incentive compensation award for each Named
Executive Officer equal to 89.2% of the Named Executive Officer’s target payment level, of which 7.6% was
attributable to a discretionary adjustment by the Compensation Committee for estimated revenue and non-GAAP
operating income lost by the Company as a result of the ZTE trade restrictions imposed by the U.S. government
during fiscal year 2018. Mr. Aldrich’s short-term incentive compensation award was prorated for the portion of fiscal
year 2018 during which he was employed.
Long-Term Stock-Based Compensation
The Compensation Committee generally makes long-term stock-based compensation awards to executive officers
on an annual basis. Long-term stock-based compensation awards are intended to align the interests of our executive
officers with those of our stockholders, and to reward our executive officers for increases in stockholder value over
long periods of time (i.e., greater than one year). It is the Company’s practice to make stock-based compensation
awards to executive officers in November of each year at a prescheduled Compensation Committee meeting. For fiscal
year 2018, the Compensation Committee made awards to each of the Named Executive Officers on November 7,
2017, at a regularly scheduled Compensation Committee meeting.
In making annual stock-based compensation awards to executive officers for fiscal year 2018, the Compensation
Committee first reviewed the Comparator Group data to determine the percentage of the total number of outstanding
shares of stock that companies in the Comparator Group typically made for annual awards under employee equity
compensation programs. The Compensation Committee then set the number of shares of the Company’s common
stock that would be made available for annual equity awards at approximately the median of the Comparator Group
after its evaluation of the Company’s business needs for the attraction and retention of executives and employees,
internal and external circumstances impacting the Company and its employees, and proxy advisor (e.g., ISS)
guidelines. The Compensation Committee then reviewed the Comparator Group competitive grant data by executive
position. The Compensation Committee then used that data and the Comparator Group data to determine a dollar
value equivalent for the long-term equity-based award for each executive officer. Forty percent (40%) of that dollar
equivalent value served as the basis for determining a number of restricted stock units (‘‘RSUs’’) to award to the
executive using the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of such award, and the remaining
sixty percent (60%) of the dollar equivalent value served as the basis for determining a number of performance share
awards (‘‘PSAs’’) for the executive using the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of such
award and an assumption that the Company would achieve the ‘‘target’’ level of performance required to earn the
PSA. The Compensation Committee’s rationale for awarding PSAs is to further align the executive’s interest with
those of the Company’s stockholders by using equity awards that will vest only if the Company achieves
pre-established performance metrics, and we believe the Compensation Committee’s decision, described below, to
award PSAs subject to a performance metric measured over a three-year performance period more closely aligns the
executive’s interest with those of the Company’s stockholders. A description of the PSAs, including the method by
which they vest and the related performance metrics, is set forth below in the ‘‘Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table.’’
For fiscal year 2018, the Compensation Committee decided not to award stock options to executive officers after
reviewing Comparator Group data that showed a general move within the industry over the past several years away
from stock options grants.
Other Compensation and Benefits
We provide other benefits to our executive officers that are intended to be part of a competitive overall
compensation program and are not tied to any company performance criteria. Consistent with the Compensation
Committee’s goal of ensuring that executive compensation is perceived as fair to all stakeholders, the Company offers
medical, dental, vision, life, and disability insurance plans to executive officers under the same terms as such benefits
are offered to other employees. Additionally, executive officers are permitted to participate in the Company’s 401(k)
Savings and Investment Plan and Employee Stock Purchase Plan under the same terms as other employees. The
Page 40 Proxy Statement
40
Company does not provide executive officers with any enhanced retirement benefits (i.e., executive officers are subject
to the same limits on contributions as other employees, as the Company does not offer any supplemental executive
retirement plan or other similar non-qualified deferred compensation plan), and they are eligible for 401(k) company-
match contributions under the same terms as other employees. In fiscal year 2018, the Company offered executives
the opportunity to participate in financial planning services through The Ayco Company, L.P. (‘‘Ayco’’), at a cost of up
to approximately $19,000 per executive paid by the Company. In fiscal year 2018, Mr. Aldrich is the only Named
Executive Officer who received financial planning services through Ayco, and he elected to pay personally for such
services.
In prior fiscal years certain executive officers were provided an opportunity to participate in the Company’s
Executive Compensation Plan (the
‘‘Executive Compensation Plan’’), an unfunded, non-qualified deferred
compensation plan, under which participants were allowed to defer a portion of their compensation. As a result of
deferred compensation legislation under Section 409A of the IRC, which became effective on December 31, 2005, the
Company no longer permits employees to make contributions to the plan. Upon retirement, as defined in the
Executive Compensation Plan, or other separation from service, or, if so elected, upon any earlier change in control of
the Company, a participant is entitled to a payment of his vested account balance, either in a single lump sum or in
annual installments, as elected in advance by the participant. Although the Company had discretion to make
additional contributions to the accounts of participants while the Executive Compensation Plan was active, it never
did so. Mr. Aldrich is the only Named Executive Officer who participated in the Executive Compensation Plan while it
was active, and upon his retirement during fiscal year 2018, he received a lump sum payment of his vested account
balance.
On September 13, 2017, the Company entered into an International Assignment Agreement with Mr. Gammel,
effective as of October 16, 2017 (the ‘‘International Assignment Agreement’’), pursuant to which Mr. Gammel has
relocated to Japan. In connection with the International Assignment Agreement, Mr. Gammel is entitled to receive
the following: (a) tax equalization payments, which are intended to leave Mr. Gammel in a net after-tax position
substantially equivalent to what he would experience if he were subject only to U.S. federal and state income taxes
during the period of the assignment, (b) payment of, or reimbursement for, certain costs related to his relocation to
Japan, including moving expenses, a car allowance, housing costs in Japan, and travel costs to return periodically to
the United States, and (c) repatriation relocation benefits at the completion of his assignment.
Severance and Change-in-Control Benefits
None of our executive officers, including the Named Executive Officers, has an employment agreement that
provides a specific term of employment with the Company. Accordingly, the employment of any such employee may
be terminated at any time. We do provide certain benefits to our Named Executive Officers upon certain qualifying
terminations of employment and in connection with terminations of employment under certain circumstances
following a change in control. A description of the material terms of our severance and change-in-control
arrangements with the Named Executive Officers can be found immediately below and further below under ‘‘Potential
Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.’’
The Compensation Committee believes that severance protections can play a valuable role in recruiting and
retaining superior talent. Severance and other termination benefits are an effective way to offer executives financial
security to incent them to forego an opportunity with another company. These agreements also protect the Company
as the Named Executive Officers are bound by restrictive non-compete and non-solicit covenants for up to two years
after termination of employment. Outside of the change-in-control context, each Named Executive Officer is entitled
to severance benefits if his employment is involuntarily terminated by the Company without cause and, in the case of
the Chief Executive Officer, if he terminates his own employment for good reason (as defined in the Chief Executive
Officer’s change-in-control agreement). The level of each Named Executive Officer’s cash severance or other
termination benefit is generally tied to his annual base salary and short-term incentive amounts. Under his agreement,
the Executive Chairman became entitled to certain severance benefits upon the expiration of the term of his
agreement in May 2018, as described further below.
Additionally, each Named Executive Officer would receive enhanced severance benefits and accelerated vesting
of equity awards if his employment were terminated under certain circumstances in connection with a change in
41
Proxy Statement Page 41
control of the Company. These benefits are described in detail further below under ‘‘Potential Payments Upon
Termination or Change in Control.’’ The Compensation Committee believes these enhanced severance benefits and
accelerated vesting are appropriate because the occurrence, or potential occurrence, of a change-in-control
transaction would likely create uncertainty regarding the continued employment of executive officers that typically
occurs in a change-in-control context, and such severance benefits and accelerated vesting encourage the Named
Executive Officers to remain employed with the Company through the change-in-control process and to focus on
enhancing stockholder value both before and during the process. In addition, the vesting protection helps assure the
Named Executive Officers that they will not lose the expected value of their equity awards because of a change in
control of the Company.
Executive Officer Stock Ownership Requirements
We have adopted Executive Stock Ownership guidelines with the objective of more closely aligning the interests
of our executive officers with those of our stockholders. Under the Executive Officer Ownership guidelines, our Chief
Executive Officer is required to hold the lower of (a) the number of shares with a fair market value equal to six
(6) times such executive’s current base salary, or (b) 135,000 shares; our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer, our Senior Vice President, Sales and Marketing, and our Senior Vice President and General Counsel are each
required to hold the lower of (a) the number of shares with a fair market value equal to two and one-half (21⁄2) times
such executive’s current base salary, or (b) 28,800, 25,200 or 25,800 shares, respectively; and our Chief Technology
Officer is required to hold the lower of (a) the number of shares with a fair market value equal to two (2) times his
current base salary, or (b) 20,100 shares. For purposes of the Executive Stock Ownership guidelines, the fair market
value of the Company’s common stock is the average closing price per share of the Company’s common stock as
reported on the Nasdaq Global Select Market (or if the common stock is not then traded on such market, such other
market on which the common stock is traded) for the twelve (12) month period ending with the determination date.
All of our Named Executive Officers are in compliance with the stock ownership guidelines as of the date hereof.
Compliance with Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m)
For fiscal year 2018, Section 162(m) of the IRC generally disallowed a tax deduction for compensation in excess
of $1 million paid to our Chief Executive Officer and any of our three other most highly compensated executive
officers, other than our Chief Financial Officer. Pursuant to the Tax Act, for fiscal years beginning after December 31,
2017, the compensation of our Chief Financial Officer will also be subject to the deduction limitation. For fiscal years
beginning on or before December 31, 2017, certain compensation, including qualified performance-based
compensation, was not subject to the deduction limit if applicable requirements were met. Pursuant to the Tax Act,
subject to certain transition rules, for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2017, the performance-based
compensation exception to the deduction limitations under Section 162(m) will no longer be available. As a result,
with the exception of compensation grandfathered pursuant to the transition rules, for fiscal years beginning after
December 31, 2017, all compensation in excess of $1 million paid to the specified executives will not be deductible.
For the Company’s fiscal year 2018 (which began on September 30, 2017, before the Tax Act changes to
Section 162(m) became effective), the Compensation Committee generally sought to structure the compensation of
our executive officers in a manner that was intended to avoid disallowance of deductions under Section 162(m).
However, the Compensation Committee reserved the right to use its judgment to authorize compensation payments
to the Company’s executives that were subject to the Section 162(m) deduction limit when the Compensation
Committee believed such payments were appropriate and in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders.
Page 42 Proxy Statement
42
Compensation Tables for Named Executive Officers
Summary Compensation Table
The following table summarizes compensation earned by, or awarded or paid to, our Named Executive Officers
for fiscal year 2018, fiscal year 2017, and our fiscal year ended September 30, 2016 (‘‘fiscal year 2016’’).
Name and Principal Position
Liam K. Griffin
President and
Chief Executive Officer
Kris Sennesael
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Carlos S. Bori(4)
Senior Vice President,
Sales and Marketing
Peter L. Gammel
Chief Technology Officer
Robert J. Terry(4)
Senior Vice President,
General Counsel and Secretary
David J. Aldrich(5)
Former Executive Chairman
Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
All Other
Compensation Compensation
($)(2)
($)(3)
Salary
($)
Stock
Awards
($)(1)
Option
Awards
($)(1)
Year
2018 894,808 7,150,399
2017 850,000 5,336,603 1,230,158
2016 660,404 3,465,060 2,591,488
2018 456,366 2,491,910
—
297,268
2017 425,000 1,289,639
926,700
40,865 1,880,500
2016
2018 398,535 2,491,910
—
287,025
2017 356,493 1,245,174
— 1,284,664
1,273,055
—
369,341
358,047
—
251,669
235,890
2018 400,754 1,245,896
978,287
2017 389,065
2016 379,900
818,455
2018 409,054 1,557,371
—
225,523
546,024
—
251,045
255,547
—
257,914
Total
($)
9,342,113
8,701,858
6,728,703
3,330,692
2,605,448
2,848,143
3,154,460
2,155,826
2,287,318
1,921,789
1,762,454
2,236,805
12,242
12,042
11,751
13,075
235,494
78
12,346
31,244
389,623
73,367
18,075
12,466
2018 565,275 6,636,938
—
2017 800,000 4,802,995 1,107,130
2016 822,981 3,720,250 2,457,108
696,448
1,198,170
—
2,914,948 10,813,609
7,924,788
7,015,382
16,493
15,043
(1) The amounts in the Stock Awards and Option Awards columns represent the grant date fair values, computed
in accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 718—Compensation—Stock Compensation (‘‘ASC 718’’),
of stock options, PSAs, and RSUs granted during the applicable fiscal year, without regard to estimated
forfeiture rates. For fiscal years 2016, 2017, and 2018, assuming the highest level of performance achievement
with respect to the PSAs, the grant date fair values of the Stock Awards would be as follows: Mr. Griffin (FY
2016: $4,483,740; FY 2017: $7,136,568; FY 2018: $9,216,421), Mr. Sennesael (FY 2016: $1,880,500; FY 2017:
$1,724,613; FY 2018: $3,211,920), Mr. Bori (FY 2017: $1,665,160; FY 2018: $3,211,920), Mr. Gammel (FY 2016:
$1,285,350; FY 2017: $1,308,264; FY 2018: $1,605,873), Mr. Terry (FY 2018: $2,007,357), and Mr. Aldrich (FY
2016: $5,842,500; FY 2017: $6,422,983; FY 2018: $8,496,368). For a description of the assumptions used in
calculating the fair value of equity awards in 2018 under ASC 718, see Note 10 of the Company’s financial
statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on November 15, 2018.
(2) Reflects amounts paid to the Named Executive Officers pursuant to the executive incentive plan adopted by the
Compensation Committee for each year indicated.
(3) ‘‘All Other Compensation’’ includes the Company’s contributions to the executive’s 401(k) Plan account, the
cost of group term life insurance premiums, cash payments upon employment termination, relocation expenses,
and tax equalization payments. For fiscal year 2018, it specifically includes $239,414 in relocation expenses and
$135,330 in tax equalization payments for Mr. Gammel in connection with the International Assignment
Agreement as well as the cash payment for Mr. Aldrich described below in footnote 5.
(4) Mr. Bori was not a named executive officer prior to fiscal year 2017 and Mr. Terry was not a named executive
officer prior to fiscal year 2018.
43
Proxy Statement Page 43
(5) Mr. Aldrich, who retired as an executive officer and employee of the Company effective May 9, 2018, thereafter
began receiving compensation as a non-employee director. In accordance with Item 402(c) of Regulation S-K,
this table includes compensation received by Mr. Aldrich during fiscal year 2018 as a non-employee director, in
addition to the compensation he received during fiscal year 2018 as an employee of the Company. The ‘‘Salary’’
amount for fiscal year 2018 includes retainer fees of $79,121 which Mr. Aldrich received as a non-employee
director following his retirement. The ‘‘Stock Awards’’ amount for fiscal year 2018 includes the grant date fair
value of 2,110 RSUs, which Mr. Aldrich received as a non-employee director elected at the 2018 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders, as described in footnote 6 of the ‘‘Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table’’ below. As
described below under ‘‘Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control,’’ a portion of the awards
granted to Mr. Aldrich in November 2017 was forfeited in connection with his cessation of employment. The
amount in the Stock Awards column for Mr. Aldrich includes the entire award granted to Mr. Aldrich in
November 2017 and has not been reduced to reflect such forfeiture. The ‘‘All Other Compensation’’ amount for
fiscal year 2018 includes $2,899,525 in cash payments for Mr. Aldrich in connection with the cessation of his
employment. For further information regarding payments to Mr. Aldrich and the accelerated vesting of his
equity awards in connection with the cessation of his employment, see below under ‘‘Potential Payments Upon
Termination or Change in Control.’’
Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table
The following table summarizes all grants of plan-based awards made to the Named Executive Officers in fiscal
year 2018, including incentive awards payable under our Fiscal Year 2018 Executive Incentive Plan.
Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Awards(1)
Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive Plan
Awards(2)
Grant
Date
Threshold
($)
Target
($)
720,000 1,440,000
Maximum Threshold Target Maximum
($)
2,880,000
(#)
(#)
(#)
18,581 37,162
74,324
207,000
414,000
828,000
141,050
282,100
564,200
140,700
281,400
562,800
144,550
289,100
578,200
640,000 1,280,000
2,560,000
6,476 12,951
25,902
6,476 12,951
25,902
3,238
6,475
12,950
4,047
8,094
16,188
16,723 33,446
66,892
Name
Liam K. Griffin
Kris Sennesael
Carlos S. Bori
Peter L. Gammel
Robert J. Terry
David J. Aldrich
11/7/2017
11/7/2017
11/7/2017
11/7/2017
11/7/2017
11/7/2017
11/7/2017
11/7/2017
11/7/2017
11/7/2017
11/7/2017
11/7/2017
5/9/2018
All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Stock Or
Units
(#)(3)
Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Stock and
Option
Awards ($)
4,395,667(4)
24,775 2,754,732(5)
1,531,895(4)
960,014(5)
8,634
1,531,895(4)
960,014(5)
8,634
4,317
5,396
765,888(4)
480,007(5)
957,390(4)
599,981(5)
3,956,124(4)
22,297 2,479,203(5)
201,611(6)
2,110
(1) The amounts shown represent the potential value of awards earned under the Incentive Plan. The amounts
actually paid to the Named Executive Officers under the Incentive Plan are shown above in the ‘‘Summary
Compensation Table’’ under ‘‘Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation.’’ For a more complete description of the
Incentive Plan, please see description above under ‘‘Components of Compensation—Short-Term Incentives.’’
(2) The amounts shown represent shares potentially issuable pursuant to PSAs granted on November 7, 2017, under
the Company’s 2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the ‘‘FY18 PSAs’’). The FY18 PSAs have both ‘‘performance’’
and ‘‘continued employment’’ conditions that must be met in order for the executive to receive shares
underlying the award.
Page 44 Proxy Statement
44
The ‘‘performance’’ condition guides the initial eligibility of the grantee to receive shares under the PSA and
compares the non-GAAP EBITDA growth achieved (related to fifty percent (50%) of the shares underlying the
award) and the total stockholder return, or TSR, percentile ranking achieved with respect to our peer group
(related to the other fifty percent (50%) of the shares underlying the award) during the applicable performance
period against a range of pre-established targets. The performance period with respect to the non-GAAP
EBITDA growth metric is the Company’s fiscal year 2018 and the performance period with respect to the TSR
percentile ranking metric is the three-year period comprising the Company’s fiscal years 2018, 2019, and 2020.
The peer group for purposes of the TSR percentile ranking metric includes each of the companies in the S&P
Semiconductor Select Industry Index as of November 7, 2017, and excludes any such company that during the
three-year performance period is acquired by or merged with (or enters into an agreement to be acquired by or
merged with) another entity. The Compensation Committee determines the ‘‘threshold’’ or minimum level of
performance that would be acceptable to the Company to justify a payout. The ‘‘maximum’’ level represents a
best-case performance scenario. The middle of the range is referred to by the Company as the ‘‘target’’ level and
represents the expected performance of the Company. The number of shares issuable under the FY18 PSAs
corresponds to the level of achievement of the performance goals. The ‘‘target’’ number of shares is determined
with reference to the competitive level of long-term equity compensation determined by the Compensation
Committee in the manner described above. Performance at the ‘‘threshold’’ level results in an issuance of a
number of shares equal to one-half (1⁄2) the ‘‘target’’ number of shares, and performance at the ‘‘maximum’’
level results in the issuance of a number of shares equal to two (2) times the ‘‘target’’ number of shares.
Performance in between either the ‘‘threshold’’ and ‘‘target’’ levels or the ‘‘target’’ and ‘‘maximum’’ levels results
in an issuance of a number of shares between the number of shares issuable under the FY18 PSAs at,
respectively, the ‘‘threshold’’ and ‘‘target’’ levels or the ‘‘target’’ and ‘‘maximum’’ levels. The non-GAAP
EBITDA growth performance goal is calculated by adding depreciation to the Company’s non-GAAP operating
income, as publicly reported in the Company’s earnings release for the applicable period, after making certain
adjustments if necessary to account for certain qualifying acquisition or disposition activities.
The ‘‘continued employment’’ condition of the FY18 PSAs provides that, to the extent that the non-GAAP
EBITDA growth and TSR percentile ranking performance metrics are met for the applicable performance
periods, then fifty percent (50%) of the total shares for which the EBITDA growth performance metric was met
would be issuable to the executive on the first anniversary of the grant date, the remaining fifty percent (50%) of
the total shares for which the EBITDA growth performance metric was met would be issuable to the executive
on the second anniversary of the grant date, and one hundred percent (100%) of the total shares for which the
TSR percentile ranking performance metric was met would be issuable to the executive on the third anniversary
of the grant date, provided that the executive remains employed by the Company through each such vesting
date. In the event of termination by reason of death or permanent disability, the holder of an FY18 PSA (or his
estate) would receive any shares that would have been issuable thereunder during the remaining term of the
award (i.e., earned but unissued shares).
(3) Represents shares underlying RSU awards granted under the Company’s 2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan. The
RSU award vests over four years at a rate of twenty-five percent (25%) per year commencing one year after the
date of grant and on each subsequent anniversary of the grant date for the following three years, provided the
executive remains employed by the Company through each such vesting date.
(4) Reflects the grant date fair value of the FY18 PSAs, computed in accordance with the provisions of ASC 718,
using (a) a Monte Carlo simulation (which weights the probability of multiple potential outcomes) to value the
portion of the award related to TSR percentile ranking, and (b) a price of $111.19 per share, which was the
closing sale price of the Company’s common stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on November 7, 2017,
to value the portion of the award related to non-GAAP EBITDA growth, assuming performance at the ‘‘target’’
level. For a description of the assumptions used in calculating the fair value of equity awards granted in fiscal
year 2018 under ASC 718, see Note 10 of the Company’s financial statements included in the Company’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on November 15, 2018.
(5) Reflects the grant date fair value of the RSUs granted on November 7, 2017, computed in accordance with the
provisions of ASC 718 using a price of $111.19 per share, which was the closing price of the Company’s common
stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on November 7, 2017.
(6) Reflects the grant date fair value of the RSUs granted on May 9, 2018, to Mr. Aldrich as a non-employee
director elected at the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, computed in accordance with the provisions of
ASC 718 using a price of $95.55 per share, which was the closing sale price of the Company’s common stock on
the Nasdaq Global Select Market on May 9, 2018.
45
Proxy Statement Page 45
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End Table
The following table summarizes the unvested stock awards and all stock options held by the Named Executive
Officers as of the end of fiscal year 2018.
Option Awards
Stock Awards
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number
of Unearned
Shares,
Units or
other
Rights
that Have
Not Vested
(#)
9,290(12)
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
other Rights
that Have
Not Vested
($)(1)
842,696
3,238(12)
293,719
3,238(12)
293,719
1,619(12)
146,859
2,023(12)
183,506
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable
—
10,750
18,250
—
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Unexercisable
10,500(2)
21,500(3)
36,500(4)
39,633(5)
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
60.97
84.89
64.59
77.66
Option
Expiration
Date
11/10/2021
11/9/2022
5/11/2023
11/9/2023
Name
Liam K. Griffin
Kris Sennesael
20,000
3,193
20,000(13)
9,577(5)
75.22
77.66
8/29/2023
11/9/2023
Carlos S. Bori
Peter L. Gammel
Robert J. Terry
David J. Aldrich
—
2,596
—
—
10,000
2,422
1,500(2)
2,595(3)
9,247(5)
60.97
84.89
77.66
11/10/2021
11/9/2022
11/9/2023
4,500(2)
10,000(3)
7,266(5)
60.97
84.89
77.66
11/10/2021
11/9/2022
11/9/2023
—
—
—
1,750(2)
2,966(3)
6,757(15)
60.97
84.89
75.91
11/10/2021
11/9/2022
11/10/2023
10,499
110,000
90,000
47,560
—
—(17)
—(18)
—(19)
25.25
60.97
84.89
77.66
5/9/2020
5/9/2020
5/9/2020
5/9/2020
Number
of Shares
or Units
of Stock
that
Have
Not
Vested
(#)
4,428(6)
69,533(7)
18,542(8)
13,000(9)
11,588(10)
24,775(11)
16,803(7)
6,462(8)
12,500(14)
2,800(10)
8,634(11)
456(6)
16,224(7)
6,462(8)
2,703(10)
8,634(11)
2,029(6)
12,747(7)
3,230(8)
2,124(10)
4,317(11)
521(6)
11,856(7)
4,038(8)
1,975(16)
5,396(11)
2,110(20)
Market
Value of
Shares
or Units
of Stock
that
Have Not
Vested
($)(1)
401,664
6,307,338
1,681,945
1,179,230
1,051,147
2,247,340
1,524,200
586,168
1,133,875
253,988
783,190
41,364
1,471,679
586,168
245,189
783,190
184,051
1,156,280
292,993
192,668
391,595
47,260
1,075,458
366,287
179,152
489,471
191,398
(1) Reflects a price of $90.71 per share, which was the closing sale price of the Company’s common stock on the Nasdaq Global
Select Market on September 28, 2018.
(2) These options were granted on November 10, 2014, and vested at a rate of twenty-five percent (25%) per year on each
anniversary of the grant date until they became fully vested on November 10, 2018.
(3) These options were granted on November 9, 2015, and vest at a rate of twenty-five percent (25%) per year on each
anniversary of the grant date through November 9, 2019.
Page 46 Proxy Statement
46
(4) These options were granted on May 11, 2016, and vest at a rate of twenty-five percent (25%) per year on each anniversary of
the grant date through May 11, 2020.
(5) These options were granted on November 9, 2016, and vest at a rate of twenty-five percent (25%) per year on each
anniversary of the grant date through November 9, 2020.
(6) Represents shares issuable under the PSAs granted on November 9, 2015, under the Company’s 2015 Long-Term Incentive
Plan (the ‘‘FY16 PSAs’’). Twenty-five percent (25%) of the shares earned under the FY16 PSAs were issued on each of
November 9, 2016, and November 9, 2017, and the remaining fifty percent (50%) of the shares earned were issued on
November 9, 2018.
(7) Represents shares issuable under the PSAs granted on November 9, 2016 (on November 10, 2016, for Mr. Terry), under the
Company’s 2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the ‘‘FY17 PSAs’’). Twenty-five percent (25%) of the shares earned under the
FY17 PSAs were issued on each of November 9, 2017, and November 9, 2018, and the remaining fifty percent (50%) of the
shares earned will be issued on November 9, 2019, provided the executive meets the continued employment condition.
(8) Represents shares issuable under the FY18 PSAs (awarded on November 7, 2017, as described in footnote 2 of the ‘‘Grants of
Plan-Based Awards Table’’ above) with respect to the EBITDA growth performance metric. With respect to this portion of the
FY18 PSAs, the Company achieved 99.8% of the ‘‘target’’ level of EBITDA growth performance, of which 7.4% was
attributable to a discretionary adjustment by the Compensation Committee for estimated EBITDA lost by the Company as a
result of the ZTE trade restrictions imposed by the U.S. government during fiscal year 2018. Accordingly, on November 7,
2018, the Company issued fifty percent (50%) of the number of shares earned by each executive under his FY18 PSA with
respect to the EBITDA growth performance metric. Fifty percent (50%) of the shares earned under the FY18 PSAs with
respect to the EBITDA growth performance metric will be issued on November 7, 2019, provided that the executive meets the
continued employment condition.
(9) Represents shares issuable under an RSU award granted on May 11, 2016, under the Company’s 2015 Long-Term Incentive
Plan. The RSU award vests at a rate of twenty-five percent (25%) per year on each anniversary of the grant date through
May 11, 2020.
(10) Represents shares issuable under an RSU award granted on November 9, 2016, under the Company’s 2015 Long-Term
Incentive Plan. The RSU award vests at a rate of twenty-five percent (25%) per year on each anniversary of the grant date
through November 9, 2020.
(11) Represents shares issuable under an RSU award granted on November 7, 2017, under the Company’s 2015 Long-Term
Incentive Plan. The RSU award vests at a rate of twenty-five percent (25%) per year on each anniversary of the grant date
through November 7, 2021.
(12) Represents shares issuable under the FY18 PSAs (awarded on November 7, 2017, as described in footnote 2 of the ‘‘Grants of
Plan-Based Awards Table’’ above) with respect to the TSR percentile ranking performance metric, assuming achievement at
the ‘‘threshold’’ level of performance. This portion of the FY18 PSAs, which is subject to a three-year performance period as
described above, will be issued on November 7, 2020, to the extent earned and provided that the executive meets the
continued employment condition.
(13) These options were granted on August 29, 2016, and vest at a rate of twenty-five percent (25%) per year on each anniversary
of the grant date through August 29, 2020.
(14) Represents shares issuable under an RSU award granted on August 29, 2016, under the Company’s 2015 Long-Term Incentive
Plan. The RSU award vests at a rate of twenty-five percent (25%) per year on each anniversary of the grant date through
August 29, 2020.
(15) These options were granted on November 10, 2016, and vest at a rate of twenty-five percent (25%) per year on each
anniversary of the grant date through November 10, 2020.
(16) Represents shares issuable under an RSU award granted on November 10, 2016, under the Company’s 2015 Long-Term
Incentive Plan. The RSU award vests at a rate of twenty-five percent (25%) per year on each anniversary of the grant date
through November 10, 2020.
(17) These options were granted on November 10, 2014, and were scheduled to vest at a rate of twenty-five percent (25%) per year
on each anniversary of the grant date until they became fully vested on November 10, 2018. In connection with the cessation
of Mr. Aldrich’s employment, these options became fully vested on May 9, 2018.
47
Proxy Statement Page 47
(18) These options were granted on November 9, 2015, and were scheduled to vest at a rate of twenty-five percent (25%) per year
on each anniversary of the grant date until they became fully vested on November 9, 2019. In connection with the cessation of
Mr. Aldrich’s employment, these options became fully vested on May 9, 2018.
(19) These options were granted on November 9, 2016, and were scheduled to vest at a rate of twenty-five percent (25%) per year
on each anniversary of the grant date until they became fully vested on November 9, 2020. In connection with the cessation of
Mr. Aldrich’s employment, these options became fully vested on May 9, 2018.
(20) Represents shares issuable under an RSU award granted on May 9, 2018, under the Company’s 2008 Director Long-Term
Incentive Plan. The RSU award vests in full on the first anniversary of the grant date.
Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table
The following table summarizes the Named Executive Officers’ option exercises and stock award vesting during
fiscal year 2018.
Name
Liam K. Griffin
Kris Sennesael
Carlos S. Bori
Peter L. Gammel
Robert J. Terry
David J. Aldrich
Option Awards
Stock Awards
Number of Shares
Acquired on Exercise
(#)
50,712
—
6,933
40,050
7,986
118,000
Value Realized
on Exercise
($)(1)
2,161,485
—
277,291
2,719,864
414,273
9,307,578
Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting
(#)
68,104
12,785
11,038
15,971
10,121
90,949
Value Realized
on Vesting
($)(2)
7,321,170
1,307,544
1,223,348
1,767,598
1,120,450
10,062,233
(1) The value realized on exercise is based on the amount by which the market price of a share of the Company’s
common stock on the dates of exercise exceeded the applicable exercise price per share of the exercised option.
(2) The value realized upon vesting is determined by multiplying (a) the number of shares underlying the stock
awards that vested, by (b) the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market
on the applicable vesting date.
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table
As described above under ‘‘Components of Compensation—Other Compensation and Benefits,’’ Mr. Aldrich is the
only Named Executive Officer who participated in the Executive Compensation Plan while it was active, and he
elected to be paid his aggregate account balance under the plan in a single lump sum upon his retirement.
Mr. Aldrich’s contributions were credited with earnings/losses based upon the performance of the investments he
selected. In connection with his retirement, the full account balance was distributed to Mr. Aldrich during fiscal year
2018 according to the terms of the Executive Compensation Plan.
The following table summarizes the aggregate earnings, distributions, and account balance under the Executive
Compensation Plan in fiscal year 2018 with respect to Mr. Aldrich.
Name
David J. Aldrich
Aggregate Earnings in
Last Fiscal Year
($)
169,667
Aggregate Withdrawals/
Distributions
($)(1)
1,650,749
Aggregate Balance at
Last Fiscal Year-End
($)
—
(1) Represents the account balance distributed to Mr. Aldrich in connection with his retirement in May 2018. This
amount consists of Mr. Aldrich’s individual contributions and the return/(loss) generated from the investment of
those contributions. The full amount of Mr. Aldrich’s individual contributions was previously reported as
compensation to Mr. Aldrich in the Summary Compensation Tables of the fiscal years in which such contributions
were made.
Page 48 Proxy Statement
48
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
Mr. Aldrich
On May 11, 2016, in connection with the transition of Mr. Aldrich from Chief Executive Officer to Executive
Chairman of the Company, the Company entered into a second amended and restated Change of Control / Severance
Agreement with Mr. Aldrich (the ‘‘Aldrich Agreement’’). The Aldrich Agreement sets out severance benefits that
become payable if, while employed by the Company, other than following a change of control, Mr. Aldrich either (i) is
terminated without cause, or (ii) terminates his employment for good reason. The severance benefits provided to
Mr. Aldrich under either of these circumstances would consist of: (i) a lump-sum payment equal to two (2) times the
sum of (A) his then-current annual base salary immediately prior to such termination and (B) the Bonus Amount (as
defined below), and (ii) full acceleration of the vesting of all of Mr. Aldrich’s outstanding stock options, which stock
options would become exercisable for a period of two (2) years after the termination date (but not beyond the
expiration of their respective maximum terms), full acceleration of the vesting of all outstanding restricted stock
awards, and the right to receive the number of performance shares under outstanding PSAs that he would have
earned had he remained employed through the end of the applicable performance period. The Bonus Amount is an
amount equal to the greater of (x) the average of the short-term cash incentive awards received for the three (3) years
prior to the year in which the termination occurs, and (y) the target annual short-term cash incentive award for the
year in which the termination occurs.
The Aldrich Agreement also sets out severance benefits that become payable if (i) within two (2) years after a
change of control, Mr. Aldrich’s employment is either (A) terminated by the Company without cause, or
(B) terminated by him for good reason, or (ii) the term of the Aldrich Agreement expires within ninety (90) days
following a change of control. The severance benefits provided to Mr. Aldrich in such circumstances would consist of:
(i) a lump-sum payment equal to two and one-half (21⁄2) times the sum of (A) his annual base salary immediately prior
to the change of control, and (B) the CIC Bonus Amount (as defined below); (ii) Mr. Aldrich’s then-outstanding stock
options would become exercisable for a period of thirty (30) months after the termination date (but not beyond the
expiration of their respective maximum terms); and (iii) provided he is eligible for and timely elects to continue
receiving group medical coverage, certain COBRA continuation for him and his eligible dependents (‘‘COBRA
continuation’’) for a period of eighteen (18) months after the termination. Additionally, except as may otherwise be
provided in an award agreement documenting an award made under the Company’s 2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan
with respect to a change in control (as that term is defined in the 2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan), in the event of a
change of control, the Aldrich Agreement provides for full acceleration of the vesting of all of Mr. Aldrich’s
then-outstanding stock options and restricted stock awards and partial acceleration of any outstanding PSAs. The CIC
Bonus Amount is an amount equal to the greater of (x) the average of the annual short-term cash incentive awards
received for the three (3) years prior to the year in which the change of control occurs and (y) the target annual
short-term cash incentive award for the year in which the change of control occurs.
The Aldrich Agreement also sets out the benefits that become payable upon the earlier of the expiration of the
term of the Aldrich Agreement (including an early expiration of the term by mutual agreement of the Company and
Mr. Aldrich) or Mr. Aldrich’s death or disability. The benefits provided to Mr. Aldrich under these circumstances
would consist of: (i) a lump-sum payment equal to one (1) times the sum of (A) his then-current annual base salary
and (B) the Bonus Amount; (ii) full acceleration of the vesting of all of Mr. Aldrich’s outstanding stock options, which
stock options would become exercisable for a period of two (2) years after the termination date (but not beyond the
expiration of their respective maximum terms), full acceleration of the vesting of all outstanding restricted stock
awards, and the right to receive the number of performance shares under outstanding PSAs that he would have
earned had he remained employed through the end of the applicable performance period (provided that such
acceleration shall only apply to a prorated portion of any awards granted to Mr. Aldrich in the final fiscal year of the
term of the Aldrich Agreement, based on the number of days he performed services for the Company in such fiscal
year); (iii) COBRA continuation for a period of eighteen (18) months after the termination; and (iv) a lump-sum
payment of his annual short-term incentive award for the fiscal year in which termination occurs, based on the
achievement of any and all applicable performance milestones determined by the Board of Directors in accordance
with the terms of the applicable executive bonus plan and prorated based on the number of days he performed
services for the Company in such fiscal year.
49
Proxy Statement Page 49
The Aldrich Agreement sets Mr. Aldrich’s annual base salary at $800,000. Mr. Aldrich will be eligible to
participate in any fiscal year executive incentive plan adopted by the Company during the term of the agreement. His
annual cash bonus opportunity (i) under the Fiscal Year 2016 Incentive Plan remained in effect for fiscal year 2016,
and (ii) under any executive bonus plan adopted by the Company for any other fiscal year during the term of the
Aldrich Agreement shall be the same as the annual cash bonus opportunity for the Company’s then-Chief Executive
Officer. The Aldrich Agreement also provides that Mr. Aldrich will be eligible to receive an annual award of stock
options and PSAs in each fiscal year during the term of the Aldrich Agreement at the same time as annual equity
awards are made to the Company’s executives, in each case, in such amount as is equal to 90% of any such award
made by the Company to the Company’s then-Chief Executive Officer.
The Aldrich Agreement has an initial term that lasts until the date on which the Company’s 2018 annual meeting
of stockholders occurs and that automatically extends until the date on which the Company’s 2019 annual meeting of
stockholders occurs, unless either the Company or Mr. Aldrich timely provides a notice of non-renewal to the other.
The Aldrich Agreement is intended to be compliant with Section 409A of the IRC. Additionally, the Aldrich
Agreement requires Mr. Aldrich to sign a release of claims in favor of the Company before he is eligible to receive any
benefits under the agreement, and contains non-compete and non-solicitation provisions applicable to him while he is
employed by the Company and for a period of twenty-four (24) months following the termination of his employment.
Additionally, award agreements for any equity awards granted to Mr. Aldrich under the Company’s
2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan, which became effective on May 18, 2015, provide that, notwithstanding the provision
in the Aldrich Agreement providing that his equity awards would vest automatically upon a change of control of the
Company, such new equity awards shall instead be governed by the terms of the 2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan, which
does not provide for automatic accelerated vesting of outstanding equity awards solely upon a change of control.
On February 8, 2018, Mr. Aldrich informed the Company that he would not extend his term as Executive
Chairman beyond the initial two-year period provided for in the Aldrich Agreement. Accordingly, on May 9, 2018, the
date of the Company’s 2018 Annual Meeting, Mr. Aldrich’s tenure as the Company’s Executive Chairman ended, with
the terms of the Aldrich Agreement governing the cessation of his employment. Mr. Aldrich continues to serve as
Chairman of the Board and, as noted above, is standing for reelection as a non-employee director at the Annual
Meeting.
The terms ‘‘change of control,’’ ‘‘cause,’’ and ‘‘good reason’’ are each defined in the Aldrich Agreement. Change
of control means, in summary: (i) the acquisition by a person or a group of 40% or more of the outstanding stock of
the Company; (ii) a change, without approval by the Board of Directors, of a majority of the Board of Directors of the
Company; (iii) the acquisition of the Company by means of a reorganization, merger, consolidation, or asset sale; or
(iv) stockholder approval of a liquidation or dissolution of the Company. Cause means, in summary: (i) deliberate
dishonesty that is significantly detrimental to the best interests of the Company; (ii) conduct constituting an act of
moral turpitude; (iii) willful disloyalty or insubordination; or (iv) incompetent performance or substantial or
continuing inattention to or neglect of duties. Good reason means, in summary: (i) a material diminution in his base
salary, authority, duties, or responsibilities; (ii) a requirement that Mr. Aldrich report to a corporate officer or
employee instead of reporting directly to the Board of Directors; (iii) a material change in his office location; or
(iv) any action or inaction constituting a material breach by the Company of the terms of the agreement.
Mr. Griffin
On May 11, 2016, in connection with the appointment of Mr. Griffin as Chief Executive Officer, the Company
entered into an amended and restated Change in Control / Severance Agreement with Mr. Griffin (the ‘‘Griffin
Agreement’’). The Griffin Agreement sets out severance benefits that become payable if, while employed by the
Company, other than following a change in control, Mr. Griffin either (i) is terminated without cause, or
(ii) terminates his employment for good reason. The severance benefits provided to Mr. Griffin under either of these
circumstances would consist of: (i) a lump-sum payment equal to two (2) times the sum of (A) his then-current annual
base salary immediately prior to such termination and (B) the Bonus Amount; (ii) full acceleration of the vesting of all
of Mr. Griffin’s outstanding stock options, which stock options would become exercisable for a period of two (2) years
after the termination date (but not beyond the expiration of their respective maximum terms), full acceleration of the
Page 50 Proxy Statement
50
vesting of all outstanding restricted stock awards, and the right to receive the number of performance shares under
outstanding PSAs that are earned but unissued and that he would have earned had he remained employed through
the end of the applicable performance period; and (iii) COBRA continuation for up to fifteen (15) months after the
termination date.
The Griffin Agreement also sets out severance benefits that become payable if, within the period of time
commencing three (3) months prior to and ending two (2) years following a change in control, Mr. Griffin’s
employment is either (i) terminated by the Company without cause, or (ii) terminated by him for good reason (a
‘‘Qualifying Termination’’). The severance benefits provided to Mr. Griffin in such circumstances would consist of the
following: (i) a lump-sum payment equal to two and one-half (21⁄2) times the sum of (A) his annual base salary
immediately prior to the change in control, and (B) the CIC Bonus Amount; (ii) all of Mr. Griffin’s then-outstanding
stock options would become exercisable for a period of thirty (30) months after the termination date (but not beyond
the expiration of their respective maximum terms); and (iii) COBRA continuation for up to eighteen (18) months
after the termination date.
The Griffin Agreement also provides that in the event of a Qualifying Termination, Mr. Griffin is entitled to full
acceleration of the vesting of all of his outstanding equity awards (including stock options, restricted stock awards,
RSU awards, and all earned but unissued performance-based equity awards) granted after January 22, 2015. At the
time of a change in control, all such outstanding equity awards would continue to be subject to the same time-based
vesting schedule to which the awards were subject prior to the change in control (including performance-based equity
awards that are deemed earned at the time of the change in control as described below). For performance-based
equity awards where the change in control occurs prior to the end of the performance period, such awards would be
deemed earned as to the greater of (i) the target level of shares for such awards, or (ii) the number of shares that
would have been earned pursuant to the terms of such awards based upon performance up through and including the
day prior to the date of the change in control. In the event that the successor or surviving company does not agree to
assume, or to substitute for, such outstanding equity awards on substantially similar terms with substantially equivalent
economic benefits as exist for such award immediately prior to the change in control, then such awards would
accelerate in full as of the change in control.
The Griffin Agreement also provides that all outstanding equity awards held by Mr. Griffin on January 22, 2015,
that were granted under the Company’s Amended and Restated 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan will continue,
following January 22, 2015, to be governed by the terms of the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan and the applicable
award agreements thereunder, which terms include automatic accelerated vesting upon a change in control event;
provided, however, that for purposes of these awards, a ‘‘change in control event’’ will be deemed to have occurred in
the event of a change in control as defined in the Griffin Agreement.
In the event of Mr. Griffin’s death or permanent disability (within the meaning of Section 22(e)(3) of the IRC),
the Griffin Agreement provides for full acceleration of the vesting of all then-outstanding equity awards subject to
time-based vesting (including stock options, restricted stock awards, RSU awards, and all performance-based equity
awards where the performance period has ended and the shares are earned but unissued). The Griffin Agreement also
provides that if Mr. Griffin’s death or permanent disability occurs prior to the end of the performance period of a
performance-based equity award, each such award would be deemed earned as to the greater of (i) the target level of
shares for such award, or (ii) the number of shares that would have been earned pursuant to the terms of such award
had he remained employed through the end of the performance period, and such earned shares would become vested
and issuable to him after the performance period ends. In addition, all outstanding stock options would be exercisable
for a period of twelve (12) months following the termination of employment (but not beyond the expiration of their
respective maximum terms).
The Griffin Agreement is intended to be exempt from or compliant with Section 409A of the IRC and has an
initial two (2) year term from May 11, 2016, and thereafter renews automatically on an annual basis for up to five (5)
additional years unless either the Company or Mr. Griffin timely provides a notice of non-renewal to the other prior
to the end of the then-current term. The payments due to Mr. Griffin under the Griffin Agreement are subject to
potential reduction in the event that such payments would otherwise become subject to excise tax incurred under
Section 4999 of the IRC, if such reduction would result in his retaining a larger amount, on an after-tax basis, than if
he had received all of the payments due.
51
Proxy Statement Page 51
Additionally, the Griffin Agreement requires that Mr. Griffin sign a release of claims in favor of the Company
before he is eligible to receive any benefits under the Griffin Agreement and contains a non-solicitation provision
applicable to Mr. Griffin while he is employed by the Company and for twelve (12) months following the termination
of his employment.
The terms ‘‘change in control,’’ ‘‘cause,’’ and ‘‘good reason’’ are each defined in the Griffin Agreement. Change
in control means, in summary: (i) the acquisition by a person or a group of 40% or more of the outstanding stock of
the Company; (ii) a change, without approval by the Board of Directors, of a majority of the Board of Directors of the
Company; (iii) the acquisition of the Company by means of a reorganization, merger, consolidation, or asset sale; or
(iv) stockholder approval of a liquidation or dissolution of the Company. Cause means, in summary: (i) deliberate
dishonesty that is significantly detrimental to the best interests of the Company; (ii) conduct constituting an act of
moral turpitude; (iii) willful disloyalty or insubordination; or (iv) incompetent performance or substantial or
continuing inattention to or neglect of duties. Good reason means, in summary: (i) a material diminution in his base
compensation, authority, duties, responsibilities, or budget over which he retains authority; (ii) a requirement that
Mr. Griffin report to a corporate officer or employee instead of reporting directly to the Board of Directors; (iii) a
material change in his office location; or (iv) any action or inaction constituting a material breach by the Company of
the terms of the agreement.
Messrs. Sennesael, Bori, Gammel, and Terry
The Company entered into Change in Control / Severance Agreements with each of Messrs. Gammel, Sennesael,
Bori, and Terry on December 16, 2014, August 29, 2016, November 9, 2016, and November 10, 2016, respectively.
Each such Change in Control / Severance Agreement is referred to herein as a ‘‘CIC Agreement.’’
Each CIC Agreement sets out severance benefits that become payable if, within the period of time commencing
three (3) months prior to and ending twelve (12) months following a change in control, the executive officer’s
employment is either (i) terminated by the Company without cause, or (ii) terminated by the executive for good
reason (for each such executive, a ‘‘Qualifying Termination’’). The severance benefits provided to the executive in
such circumstances would consist of the following: (i) a lump sum payment equal to one and one-half (11⁄2) times
(two (2) times, in the case of Mr. Gammel) the sum of (A) his annual base salary immediately prior to the change in
control, and (B) the CIC Bonus Amount; (ii) all of the executive’s then-outstanding stock options would remain
exercisable for a period of eighteen (18) months after the termination date (but not beyond the expiration of their
respective maximum terms); and (iii) COBRA continuation for up to eighteen (18) months after the termination date.
Each CIC Agreement also provides that in the event of a Qualifying Termination, the executive is entitled to full
acceleration of the vesting of all of his outstanding equity awards (including stock options, restricted stock awards,
RSU awards, and all earned but unissued performance-based equity awards). At the time of a change in control, all
such outstanding equity awards would continue to be subject to the same time-based vesting schedule to which the
awards were subject prior to the change in control (including performance-based equity awards that are deemed
earned at the time of the change in control as described below). For performance-based equity awards where the
change in control occurs prior to the end of the performance period, such awards would be deemed earned as to the
greater of (i) the target level of shares for such awards, or (ii) the number of shares that would have been earned
pursuant to the terms of such awards based upon performance up through and including the day prior to the date of
the change in control. In the event that the successor or surviving company does not agree to assume, or to substitute
for, such outstanding equity awards on substantially similar terms with substantially equivalent economic benefits as
exist for such award immediately prior to the change in control, then such awards would accelerate in full as of the
change in control.
The CIC Agreement for each of Messrs. Gammel, Bori, and Terry also provides that all outstanding equity
awards held by the executive on the effective date of the agreement (January 22, 2015, in the case of Mr. Gammel, and
November 10, 2016, in the case of Mr. Bori and Mr. Terry) that were granted under the Company’s Amended and
Restated 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan will continue, following the agreement effective date, to be governed by the
terms of the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan and the applicable award agreements thereunder, which terms include
automatic accelerated vesting upon a change in control event; provided, however, that for purposes of these awards,
Page 52 Proxy Statement
52
a ‘‘change in control event’’ will be deemed to have occurred in the event of a change in control as defined in the CIC
Agreement. On May 18, 2015, the Company’s stockholders approved the 2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan, which does
not provide for automatic accelerated vesting of outstanding equity awards upon a change in control. Since May 18,
2015, no awards have been made, and in the future no awards will be made, to the Named Executive Officers or other
employees under the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
Each CIC Agreement also sets out severance benefits outside a change in control that become payable if the
executive’s employment is terminated by the Company without cause. The severance benefits provided to the
executive under such circumstance would consist of the following: (i) in the case of Mr. Gammel, a lump sum payment
equal to the sum of (x) his annual base salary, and (y) any short-term cash incentive award then due, and in the case of
Messrs. Sennesael, Bori, and Terry, biweekly compensation continuation payments for a period of twelve (12) months,
with each such compensation continuation payment being equal to the aggregate payment amount divided by
twenty-six (26), where the aggregate payment is equal to the sum of (x) his annual base salary, and (y) any short-term
cash incentive award then due; (ii) all then-vested outstanding stock options would remain exercisable for a period of
twelve (12) months after the termination date (but not beyond the expiration of their respective maximum terms); and
(iii) COBRA continuation coverage for up to twelve (12) months after the termination date.
In the event of the executive’s death or permanent disability (within the meaning of Section 22(e)(3) of the IRC),
each CIC Agreement provides for full acceleration of the vesting of all then-outstanding equity awards subject to
time-based vesting (including stock options, restricted stock awards, RSU awards, and all performance-based equity
awards where the performance period has ended and the shares are earned but unissued). Each CIC Agreement also
provides that for a performance-based equity award where the executive’s death or permanent disability occurs prior
to the end of the performance period, such award would be deemed earned as to the greater of (i) the target level of
shares for such award, or (ii) the number of shares that would have been earned pursuant to the terms of such award
had the executive remained employed through the end of the performance period, and such earned shares would
become vested and issuable to the executive after the performance period ends. In addition, all outstanding stock
options would remain exercisable for a period of twelve (12) months following the termination of employment (but
not beyond the expiration of their respective maximum terms).
Each CIC Agreement is intended to be exempt from or compliant with Section 409A of the IRC and has an initial
two (2) year term, and thereafter renews automatically on an annual basis for up to five (5) additional years unless
either the Company or the executive timely provides a notice of non-renewal to the other prior to the end of the
then-current term. The payments due to each executive under his CIC Agreement are subject to potential reduction in
the event that such payments would otherwise become subject to excise tax incurred under Section 4999 of the IRC, if
such reduction would result in the executive retaining a larger amount, on an after-tax basis, than if he had received all
of the payments due.
Additionally, each CIC Agreement requires that the executive sign a release of claims in favor of the Company
before he is eligible to receive any benefits under the agreement. The CIC Agreement for Mr. Gammel contains
non-compete and non-solicitation provisions applicable to the executive while he is employed by the Company and for
a period of twenty-four (24) months following the termination of his employment. The CIC Agreement for each of
Messrs. Sennesael, Bori, and Terry contains non-solicitation provisions applicable to the executive while he is
employed by the Company and for a period of twelve (12) months following the termination of his employment.
The terms ‘‘change in control,’’ ‘‘cause,’’ and ‘‘good reason’’ are each defined in the CIC Agreements. Change in
control means, in summary: (i) the acquisition by a person or a group of 40% or more of the outstanding stock of the
Company; (ii) a change, without approval by the Board of Directors, of a majority of the Board of Directors of the
Company; (iii) the acquisition of the Company by means of a reorganization, merger, consolidation, or asset sale; or
(iv) stockholder approval of a liquidation or dissolution of the Company. Cause means, in summary: (i) deliberate
dishonesty that is significantly detrimental to the best interests of the Company; (ii) conduct constituting an act of
moral turpitude; (iii) willful disloyalty or insubordination; or (iv) incompetent performance or substantial or
continuing inattention to or neglect of duties. Good reason means, in summary: (i) a material diminution in the
executive’s base compensation, authority, duties, or responsibilities; (ii) a material diminution in the authority, duties,
or responsibilities of the executive’s supervisor; (iii) a material change in the executive’s office location; or (iv) any
action or inaction constituting a material breach by the Company of the terms of the agreement.
53
Proxy Statement Page 53
The following table summarizes the payments and benefits that would be made to the Named Executive Officers,
with the exception of Mr. Aldrich, as of September 28, 2018, in the following circumstances as of such date:
• termination without cause outside of a change in control;
• termination without cause or for good reason in connection with a change in control;
• in the event of a termination of employment because of death or disability; and
• upon a change in control not involving a termination of employment.
The accelerated equity values in the table reflect a price of $90.71 per share, which was the closing sale price of
the Company’s common stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on September 28, 2018. The table does not reflect
any equity awards made after September 28, 2018.
Name
Liam K. Griffin(3)
Kris Sennesael(3)
Carlos S. Bori(3)
Peter L. Gammel(3)
Robert J. Terry(3)
Benefit
Salary and Short-Term Incentive
Accelerated Options
Accelerated RSUs
Accelerated PSAs
Medical
TOTAL
Salary and Short-Term Incentive
Accelerated Options
Accelerated RSUs
Accelerated PSAs
Medical
TOTAL
Salary and Short-Term Incentive
Accelerated Options
Accelerated RSUs
Accelerated PSAs
Medical
TOTAL
Salary and Short-Term Incentive
Accelerated Options
Accelerated RSUs
Accelerated PSAs
Medical
TOTAL
Salary and Short-Term Incentive
Accelerated Options
Accelerated RSUs
Accelerated PSAs
Medical
TOTAL
Change
in Control
w/o
Disability Termination
Termination
w/o Cause
Outside
Change in
Control
($)(1)
4,680,000(4)
1,907,991
4,477,718
10,079,877
21,612
Death/
Termination
w/o Cause
or for Good
Reason,
After
Change in
Control ($)
5,850,000(5)
—
1,907,991
1,907,991
4,477,718
4,477,718
10,079,877 10,079,877
—
25,934
($)
($)(2)
—
312,270
—
—
—
312,270
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
44,610
—
—
—
44,610
—
133,830
—
—
—
133,830
—
52,045
—
—
—
52,045
21,167,198
22,341,520 16,465,586
460,000(6)
—
—
—
18,853
1,311,000(7)
434,780
2,171,053
2,698,895
28,280
—
434,780
2,171,053
2,698,895
—
478,853
6,644,008
5,304,728
403,000(6)
—
—
—
18,853
1,027,650(7)
180,386
1,028,379
2,687,737
28,280
—
180,386
1,028,379
2,687,737
—
421,853
4,952,432
3,896,502
402,000(6)
—
—
—
18,853
1,366,800(8)
286,851
584,263
1,927,588
28,280
—
286,851
584,263
1,927,588
—
420,853
4,193,782
2,798,702
413,000(6)
—
—
—
18,853
1,053,150(7)
169,311
668,623
1,856,834
28,280
—
169,311
668,623
1,856,834
—
431,853
3,776,198
2,694,768
(1) For Mr. Griffin, includes amounts payable pursuant to a termination for good reason outside of a change in
control.
(2) Represents the value of unvested equity awards granted to Named Executive Officers under the 2005
Long-Term Incentive Plan, which accelerate automatically upon a change in control of the Company. Equity
awards granted to Named Executive Officers under the 2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan are not subject to
Page 54 Proxy Statement
54
accelerated vesting solely upon a change in control of the Company (unless the successor or surviving company
does not agree to assume, or to substitute for, outstanding equity awards on substantially similar terms with
substantially equivalent economic benefits as exist for such award immediately prior to the change in control, in
which case the awards would accelerate in full as of the change in control).
(3) Excludes the value of accrued vacation/paid time off required by law to be paid upon termination.
(4) Represents an amount equal to two (2) times the sum of (A) Mr. Griffin’s annual base salary as of
September 28, 2018, and (B) an Incentive Plan payment, which is equal to Mr. Griffin’s ‘‘target’’ short-term cash
incentive award for fiscal year 2018, since such ‘‘target’’ payout level is greater than the three (3) year average of
the actual incentive payments made to Mr. Griffin for fiscal years 2015, 2016, and 2017.
(5) Represents an amount equal to two and one-half (21⁄2) times the sum of (A) Mr. Griffin’s annual base salary as
of September 28, 2018, and (B) an Incentive Plan payment, which is equal to Mr. Griffin’s ‘‘target’’ short-term
cash incentive award for fiscal year 2018, since such ‘‘target’’ payout level is greater than the three (3) year
average of the actual incentive payments made to Mr. Griffin for fiscal years 2015, 2016, and 2017.
(6) Represents an amount equal to the Named Executive Officer’s annual base salary as of September 28, 2018.
(7) Represents an amount equal to one and one-half (11⁄2) times the sum of (A) the Named Executive Officer’s
annual base salary as of September 28, 2018, and (B) an Incentive Plan payment, which is equal to the Named
Executive Officer’s ‘‘target’’ short-term cash incentive award for fiscal year 2018, since such ‘‘target’’ payout
level is greater than the three (3) year average of the actual incentive payments made to the Named Executive
Officer for fiscal years 2015, 2016, and 2017.
(8) Represents an amount equal to two (2) times the sum of (A) Mr. Gammel’s annual base salary as of
September 28, 2018, and (B) an Incentive Plan payment, which is equal to Mr. Gammel’s ‘‘target’’ short-term
cash incentive award for fiscal year 2018, since such ‘‘target’’ payout level is greater than the three (3) year
average of the actual incentive payments made to Mr. Gammel for fiscal years 2015, 2016, and 2017.
The following table summarizes the payments and benefits that were made to Mr. Aldrich in fiscal year 2018 in
connection with the cessation of his employment as Executive Chairman in May 2018, pursuant to the Aldrich
Agreement.
Benefit
Cash Payment
Accelerated Options
Accelerated RSUs
Accelerated FY16 and FY17 PSAs
Accelerated FY18 PSAs
Medical
TOTAL
($)
2,776,448(1)
2,504,711(2)
2,392,808(2)
7,150,342(2)
1,013,525(3)
28,280(4)
15,866,114
(1) Represents an amount equal to the sum of (A) Mr. Aldrich’s annual base salary as of May 9, 2018, (B) an
Incentive Plan payment, which is equal to Mr. Aldrich’s ‘‘target’’ short-term cash incentive award for fiscal year
2018, since such ‘‘target’’ payout level is greater than the three (3) year average of the actual incentive payments
made to Mr. Aldrich for fiscal years 2015, 2016, and 2017, and (C) Mr. Aldrich’s actual Incentive Plan payment
earned for fiscal year 2018, prorated for the portion of fiscal year 2018 during which he was employed. Excludes
the value of accrued vacation/paid time off required by law to be paid upon termination as well as distributions
under the Executive Compensation Plan (see the discussion above regarding this inactive plan in the
‘‘Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table’’).
(2) The accelerated option, RSU, FY16 PSA, and FY17 PSA values reflect a price of $99.58 per share, which was
the closing sale price of the Company’s common stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on May 24, 2018,
the date on which such awards became fully vested. In accordance with the Aldrich Agreement, only a prorated
portion of the RSUs granted to Mr. Aldrich on November 7, 2017, during the final fiscal year of the term of the
55
Proxy Statement Page 55
Aldrich Agreement, was accelerated, with such proration based on the number of days Mr. Aldrich performed
services for the Company in fiscal year 2018, and with the remainder of such RSUs being forfeited.
(3) The FY18 PSA value reflects a price of $99.58 per share, which was the closing sale price of the Company’s
common stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on May 24, 2018, the date on which Mr. Aldrich’s
outstanding awards became fully vested, even though the number of shares to be awarded under the FY18 PSAs
had not yet been established as of such date. In accordance with the Aldrich Agreement, Mr. Aldrich became
entitled to only a prorated portion of the FY18 PSAs granted to him, with such proration based on the number
of days Mr. Aldrich performed services for the Company in fiscal year 2018, and with the remainder of the FY18
PSAs being forfeited. The FY18 PSA value includes only the portion of the FY18 PSAs earned with respect to
the EBITDA growth performance metric, which was subject to a one-year performance period, and does not
include the value of the portion of the FY18 PSAs to be earned with respect to the TSR percentile ranking
performance metric, which is subject to a three-year performance period as described above. The maximum
value to which Mr. Aldrich would be entitled with respect to such portion, assuming maximum performance
with respect to the TSR percentile ranking performance metric and assuming a price of $99.58 per share, is
$2,031,233.
(4) Reflects anticipated cost of COBRA continuation for a period of eighteen (18) months based on rates as of
May 9, 2018.
CEO Pay Ratio
Following is a reasonable estimate, prepared under applicable SEC rules, of the ratio of the annual total
compensation of our CEO to the median of the annual total compensation of our other employees. For fiscal year
2018:
• The annual total compensation of our CEO was $9,342,113.
• The annual total compensation of our median compensated employee was $20,881.
• Based on the foregoing, we estimate that our CEO’s total annual compensation was approximately 447 times
that of our median employee.
To determine the median of the annual total compensation of our employees, we applied the following
methodology and material assumptions:
• We did not use the de minimis exception to exclude any non-U.S. employees. We have a globally diverse
workforce with total headcount of approximately 9,400 as of September 28, 2018, of which approximately 7,200
are located outside the United States, primarily in locations employing large direct labor forces such as Mexico
and Singapore where wages are significantly lower than in the United States. The median employee identified
within this employee population as of September 28, 2018, is a full-time employee in our Mexicali, Mexico
facility.
• To identify the median employee, we used a consistently applied compensation measure that included total
taxable earnings paid to our employees in the most recently completed taxable year in their respective
jurisdictions. This included base salary, overtime pay, shift premiums, recognition bonuses, annual cash
incentive awards, and long-term stock-based incentive awards. We annualized the compensation of permanent,
full-time, and part-time employees who were hired after the beginning of the most recently completed taxable
year in their respective jurisdictions. We applied an exchange rate as of September 28, 2018, to convert all
international currencies into U.S. dollars.
• Using this consistently applied compensation measure, we identified an employee at the median, as well as
other employees nearest the median, and calculated each such employee’s total compensation for fiscal year
2018 in accordance with Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K. We determined that the originally identified
median employee’s total compensation had anomalous characteristics, so we exercised discretion as permitted
by SEC rules to select as the median employee an employee whose compensation we viewed to be more
representative of the population near the median.
Page 56 Proxy Statement
56
• We did not use any cost-of-living adjustments in identifying the median employee.
• The annual total compensation of our CEO is the amount reported in the ‘‘Total’’ column of our 2018
Summary Compensation Table.
We believe our pay ratio presented above is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with
Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K. The SEC rules for identifying the median compensated employee and calculating the
pay ratio based on that employee’s annual total compensation allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to
apply certain exclusions, and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions. As a result, the pay ratio reported by
other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported above, as other companies may have different
employment and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates, and
assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios.
Director Compensation
The Board of Directors sets the compensation for the Company’s non-employee directors, after receiving the
recommendations of the Compensation Committee. In formulating its recommendations, the Compensation
Committee seeks and receives input from Aon/Radford related to the amounts, terms and conditions of director cash
compensation and stock-based compensation awards, with the goal of establishing non-employee director
compensation that is similar to, and competitive with, the compensation of non-employee directors at peer companies
in the semiconductor industry.
Cash Compensation
Currently, non-employee directors of the Company are paid, in quarterly installments, an annual retainer of
$70,000. Additional annual retainers for Chairman, Lead Independent Director, and/or committee service (paid in
quarterly installments) are as follows: any non-employee Chairman of the Board ($130,000); the Lead Independent
Director, if one has been appointed ($50,000); the Chairman of the Audit Committee ($30,000); the Chairman of the
Compensation Committee ($20,000); the Chairman of the Nominating and Governance Committee ($15,000);
non-chair member of Audit Committee ($12,000); non-chair member of Compensation Committee ($10,000); and
non-chair member of Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee ($5,000). In addition, the Compensation
Committee continues to retain discretion to recommend to the full Board of Directors that additional cash payments
be made to a non-employee director for extraordinary service during a fiscal year.
Equity Compensation
Currently, following each annual meeting of stockholders, each non-employee director who is reelected will
receive a grant of RSUs having a value of approximately $200,000. Any newly appointed non-employee director will
receive an initial equity grant of RSUs having a value of approximately $200,000. The number of shares subject to a
non-employee director’s initial RSU award or annual award is determined by dividing the approximate value of the
award, as stated above, by the average closing price per share of the Company’s common stock as reported on the
Nasdaq Global Select Market (or if the common stock is not then traded on such market, such other market on which
the common stock is traded) for each trading day during the 30 consecutive trading day period ending on, and
including, the grant date. Unless otherwise determined by the Board of Directors, (a) a non-employee director’s initial
equity grant of RSUs will vest in three (3) equal annual installments on the first three anniversaries of the date of
grant, and (b) a non-employee director’s annual equity grant of RSUs will vest on the first anniversary of the date of
grant. In the event of a change in control of the Company, any outstanding options and RSUs awarded under the 2008
Director Long-Term Incentive Plan will become fully exercisable and deemed fully vested, respectively.
No director who is also an employee receives separate compensation for services rendered as a director.
Mr. Griffin is currently the only director who is also an employee of the Company. As discussed above, Mr. Aldrich
was an employee of the Company until May 9, 2018, at which time he began receiving compensation for services
rendered as a non-employee director.
57
Proxy Statement Page 57
Director Compensation Table
The following table summarizes the compensation paid to the Company’s non-employee directors for fiscal year
2018. The compensation paid to Mr. Aldrich, who retired as an employee of the Company effective May 9, 2018, and
thereafter began receiving compensation as a non-employee director, is included above in the ‘‘Summary
Compensation Table,’’ as required by Item 402(c) of Regulation S-K.
Name
David J. McLachlan,
Lead Independent Director
Kevin L. Beebe
Timothy R. Furey
Balakrishnan S. Iyer
Christine King
David P. McGlade
Robert A. Schriesheim
Kimberly S. Stevenson
Fees Earned
or Paid in Cash
($)
Stock
Awards
($)(1)(2)
137,000
92,000
85,000
95,750
90,000
85,000
98,500
14,457
201,611
201,611
201,611
201,611
201,611
201,611
201,611
190,546
Total
($)
338,611
293,611
286,611
297,361
291,611
286,611
300,111
205,003
(1) The non-employee members of the Board of Directors who held such positions on September 28, 2018, held the
following aggregate number of unvested RSU awards as of such date:
Name
David J. McLachlan,
Lead Independent Director
Kevin L. Beebe
Timothy R. Furey
Balakrishnan S. Iyer
Christine King
David P. McGlade
Robert A. Schriesheim
Kimberly S. Stevenson
Number of Shares
Subject to
Unvested RSUs
2,110
2,110
2,110
2,110
2,110
2,110
2,110
2,017
(2) Reflects the grant date fair value of 2,110 RSUs granted on May 9, 2018, to each non-employee director elected
at the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, computed in accordance with the provisions of ASC 718 using a
price of $95.55 per share, which was the closing sale price of the Company’s common stock on the Nasdaq Global
Select Market on May 9, 2018. For Ms. Stevenson, reflects the grant date fair value of 2,017 RSUs granted on
July 24, 2018, upon her initial appointment to the Board of Directors.
Director Stock Ownership Requirements
We have adopted Director Stock Ownership guidelines with the objective of more closely aligning the interests of
our directors with those of our stockholders. The minimum number of shares of the Company’s common stock that
the Director Stock Ownership guidelines require non-employee directors to hold while serving in their capacity as
directors is the director base compensation (currently $70,000) multiplied by five (5), divided by the fair market value
of the Company’s common stock (rounded to the nearest 100 shares). For purposes of the Director Stock Ownership
guidelines, the fair market value of the Company’s common stock is the average closing price per share of the
Company’s common stock as reported on the Nasdaq Global Select Market (or if the common stock is not then traded
on such market, such other market on which the common stock is traded) for the twelve (12) month period ending
with the determination date. All of our directors have met the stock ownership guidelines as of the date hereof (with
Page 58 Proxy Statement
58
the exception of Ms. Stevenson, who is not required to comply with the guidelines until the fifth anniversary of her
appointment to the Board of Directors).
Equity Compensation Plan Information
As of September 28, 2018, the Company has the following equity compensation plans under which its equity
securities were authorized for issuance to its employees and/or directors:
• the 1999 Employee Long-Term Incentive Plan
• the 2002 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
• the Non-Qualified Employee Stock Purchase Plan
• the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan
• AATI 2005 Equity Incentive Plan
• the 2008 Director Long-Term Incentive Plan
• the 2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan
Except for the 1999 Employee Long-Term Incentive Plan (the ‘‘1999 Employee Plan’’) and the Non-Qualified
Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the ‘‘Non-Qualified ESPP’’), each of the foregoing equity compensation plans was
approved by the Company’s stockholders. A description of the material features of each non-stockholder approved
plan is provided below under the headings ‘‘1999 Employee Long-Term Incentive Plan’’ and ‘‘Non-Qualified Employee
Stock Purchase Plan.’’
The following table presents information about these plans as of September 28, 2018.
Number of Securities to be
Issued Upon Exercise of
Outstanding Options,
Weighted Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants, and Rights (#) Warrants and Rights ($)
(a)
(b)
Number of Securities
Remaining Available for
Future Issuance Under
Equity Compensation
Plans (Excluding
Securities
Reflected in
Column (a)) (#)
(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security
holders
1,854,438(1)
58.54
14,515,549(2)
Equity compensation plans not approved by
security holders
TOTAL
52,600
1,907,038
7.13
57.12
142,027(3)
14,657,576
(1) Excludes 1,181,861 unvested shares under restricted stock and RSU awards and 1,325,017 unvested shares under
PSAs, which figure assumes achievement of performance goals under the FY18 PSAs at target levels.
(2) Includes 377,419 shares available for future issuance under the 2002 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, 13,448,078 shares
available for future issuance under the 2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan, and 650,052 shares available for future
issuance under the 2008 Director Long-Term Incentive Plan. No further grants will be made under the AATI 2005
Equity Incentive Plan or the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
(3) Represents shares available under the Non-Qualified ESPP. No further grants will be made under the 1999 Employee
Plan.
59
Proxy Statement Page 59
1999 Employee Long-Term Incentive Plan
The 1999 Employee Plan provided for the grant of non-qualified stock options to purchase shares of the Company’s
common stock to employees, other than officers and non-employee directors. The term of these options may not exceed
10 years. The 1999 Employee Plan contains provisions that permit restrictions on vesting or transferability, as well as
continued exercisability upon a participant’s termination of employment with the Company, of options granted thereunder.
The 1999 Employee Plan provides for full acceleration of the vesting of options granted thereunder upon a ‘‘change in
control’’ of the Company, as defined in the 1999 Employee Plan. The Board of Directors generally may amend, suspend or
terminate the 1999 Employee Plan in whole or in part at any time; provided that any amendment that affects outstanding
options be consented to by the holder of the options. As of April 26, 2009, no additional grants were issuable under the
1999 Employee Long-Term Incentive Plan.
Non-Qualified Employee Stock Purchase Plan
The Company also maintains the Non-Qualified ESPP to provide employees of the Company and participating
subsidiaries with an opportunity to acquire a proprietary interest in the Company through the purchase, by means of
payroll deductions, of shares of the Company’s common stock at a discount from the market price of the common stock at
the time of purchase. The Non-Qualified ESPP is intended for use primarily by employees of the Company located outside
the United States. Under the plan, eligible employees may purchase common stock through payroll deductions of up to
10% of compensation. The price per share is the lower of 85% of the market price at the beginning or end of each
six-month offering period.
Page 60 Proxy Statement
60
Compensation Committee Report
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included
herein with management, and based on the review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the
Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement for the 2019
Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
Christine King, Chairman
David P. McGlade
Robert A. Schriesheim
61
Proxy Statement Page 61
Proposal 4:
Stockholder Proposal Regarding Simple Majority Voting
In accordance with SEC rules, we have set forth below a stockholder proposal from Mr. John Chevedden,
2215 Nelson Avenue, No. 205, Redondo Beach, CA 90278. Mr. Chevedden has notified us that he is the beneficial
owner of 100 shares of the Company’s common stock and that he intends to present the following proposal at the
Annual Meeting. The stockholder proposal will be voted upon at the Annual Meeting if properly presented. The text
of the stockholder’s resolution and the statement the stockholder furnished to us in support thereof appear below,
exactly as submitted. The stockholder proposal includes some assertions the Company believes are incorrect. The
Company assumes no responsibility for the content or accuracy of the proposal.
Proposal 4—Simple Majority Vote
RESOLVED, Shareholders request that our board take each step necessary so that each voting requirement
in our charter and bylaws (that is explicit or implicit due to default to state law) that calls for a greater than
simple majority vote be eliminated, and replaced by a requirement for a majority of the votes cast for and against
applicable proposals, or a simple majority in compliance with applicable laws. If necessary this means the closest
standard to a majority of the votes cast for and against such proposals consistent with applicable laws. A necessary
unified element of this one proposal it that it includes taking the steps necessary to adjourn the annual meeting to
solicit the votes necessary for approval if the votes for approval are lacking during the annual meeting.
To facilitate this adjourn is mentioned 16-times in our bylaws.
Shareholders proposals such as this have taken a leadership role to improve the corporate governance rules of
our company. For instance after Skyworks Solutions received shareholder proposals Skyworks Solutions then
adopted better practices such as eliminating a supermajority vote requirement (2016) and adopted a rudimentary
version of shareholder proxy access (2017).
On the other hand the Skyworks Solutions Board of Directors is talking a leadership role in the opposite
direction. Under the leadership of Mr. Balakrishnan Iyer, who chaired the Skyworks Solutions governance
committee, the Board of Directors hired a law firm that employs 1000 attorneys to prevent Skyworks Solutions
shareholders from even voting on improving our rudimentary version of a shareholder right to call a special
meeting (2018).
According to Mr. Iyer’s proxy biography it seems that he retried from full-time work at age 46. And Mr. Iyer
is also on the governance committees of IHS Markit Ltd (INFO) and Power Integrations Inc (POWI) where he
may again be in favor of downsizing shareholder rights.
Shareholders are willing to pay a premium for shares of companies that have excellent corporate governance.
Supermajority voting requirements have been found to be one of 6 entrenching mechanisms that are negatively
related to company performance according to ‘‘What Matters in Corporate Governance’’ by Lucien Bebchuk,
Alma Cohen and Allen Ferrell of the Harvard Law School. Supermajority requirements are used to block
initiatives supported by most shareowners but opposed by a status quo management.
This proposal topic won from 74% to 88% support at Weyerhaeuser, Alcoa, Waste Management, Goldman
Sachs, FirstEnergy, McGraw-Hill and Macy’s. The proponents of these proposals included Ray T. Chevedden and
William Steiner.
Currently a 1%-minority can frustrate the will of our 79%-shareholder majority. In other words a 1%-minority
could have the power to prevent shareholders from improving the governing rules of our company. This can be
particularly important during periods of management underperformance and/or an economic downturn. Currently
the role of shareholders is downsized because management can simply push the snooze button in response to a
79%-vote of shareholders on certain issues.
Please vote yes:
Simple Majority Vote—Proposal 4
Page 62 Proxy Statement
62
Statement by the Board of Directors on the Stockholder Proposal
At the Company’s 2016 Annual Meeting, we presented five Company proposals that, if approved by the
stockholders, would have removed all existing supermajority voting provisions from the Company’s Restated
Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, which we refer to as our Charter. Each of the proposals was supported by
the Board of Directors, which believed them to be in the best interests of our stockholders, after taking into
consideration emerging trends in corporate governance as well as the approval by our stockholders of a stockholder
proposal presented at our 2015 Annual Meeting similar to the stockholder proposal above. However, despite the
recommendation of the Board of Directors in favor of all five proposals, only one of the five proposals (the one
requiring the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock) passed.
Specifically, the four proposals that did not pass were for approval of amendments to the Charter to eliminate the
supermajority voting provisions relating to the following:
• Stockholder approval of a merger or consolidation, disposition of all or substantially all of our assets, or
issuance of a substantial amount of our securities (requiring the affirmative vote of at least 80% of the shares
of the Company’s outstanding common stock);
• Stockholder approval of a business combination with any related person (requiring the affirmative vote of at
least 90% of the shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock);
• Stockholder amendment of Charter provisions governing directors (requiring the affirmative vote of at least
80% of the shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock); and
• Stockholder amendment of Charter provisions governing action by stockholders (requiring the affirmative vote
of at least 80% of the shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock).
We view the advisory vote on the stockholder proposal above as an opportunity for our stockholders to indicate
whether there might be sufficient support to pass the four previously failed proposals should they be reintroduced in
the future. The Board of Directors will carefully consider the outcome of the vote on this proposal, together with
additional investor input received in the course of the Company’s regular stockholder engagement program, in
reaching a decision regarding how to proceed.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS MAKES NO RECOMMENDATION REGARDING
HOW STOCKHOLDERS SHOULD VOTE ON PROPOSAL 4
63
Proxy Statement Page 63
Security Ownership of Certain
Beneficial Owners and Management
To the Company’s knowledge, the following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of the Company’s common
stock as of March 14, 2019, by the following individuals or entities: (i) each person or entity who beneficially owns five
percent (5%) or more of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock as of March 14, 2019; (ii) the Named
Executive Officers (as defined above under ‘‘Information About Executive and Director Compensation’’); (iii) each
director and nominee for director; and (iv) all current executive officers and directors of the Company, as a group.
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC, is not necessarily indicative of
beneficial ownership for any other purpose, and does not constitute an admission that the named stockholder is a
direct or indirect beneficial owner of those shares. As of March 14, 2019, there were 173,001,607 shares of the
Company’s common stock issued and outstanding.
In computing the number of shares of Company common stock beneficially owned by a person and the
percentage ownership of that person, shares of Company common stock that are subject to stock options or other
rights held by that person that are currently exercisable or that will become exercisable within sixty (60) days of
March 14, 2019, are deemed outstanding. These shares are not, however, deemed outstanding for the purpose of
computing the percentage ownership of any other person.
Names and Addresses of Beneficial Owners(1)
The Vanguard Group, Inc.
BlackRock, Inc.
Vulcan Value Partners, LLC
Capital Research Global Investors
David J. Aldrich
Kevin L. Beebe
Carlos S. Bori
Timothy R. Furey
Peter L. Gammel
Liam K. Griffin
Balakrishnan S. Iyer
Christine King
David P. McGlade
David J. McLachlan
Robert A. Schriesheim
Kris Sennesael
Kimberly S. Stevenson
Robert J. Terry
All current directors and executive officers as a group (14 persons)
*
Less than 1%
Number of Shares
Beneficially
Owned(2)
18,785,103(3)
13,271,115(4)
9,614,290(5)
8,802,918(6)
466,798(7)
57,273
27,354(7)
26,824
36,807(7)
181,049(7)
20,432
17,038
69,798
69,198
73,205
45,491
—
21,804(7)
1,113,071(7)
Percent of
Class
10.86%
7.67%
5.56%
5.09%
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(1) Unless otherwise set forth in the following notes, each person’s address is the address of the Company’s
principal executive offices at Skyworks Solutions, Inc., 20 Sylvan Road, Woburn, MA 01801, and stockholders
have sole voting and sole investment power with respect to the shares, except to the extent such power may be
shared by a spouse or otherwise subject to applicable community property laws.
Page 64 Proxy Statement
64
(2) Includes the number of shares of Company common stock subject to stock options held by that person that are
currently exercisable or will become exercisable within sixty (60) days of March 14, 2019 (the ‘‘Current
Options’’), as follows: Mr. Aldrich—246,559 shares under Current Options; Mr. Bori—8,477 shares under
Current Options; Mr. Gammel—24,344 shares under Current Options; Mr. Griffin—81,711 shares under
Current Options; Mr. Sennesael—26,386 shares under Current Options; Mr. Terry—5,486 shares under Current
Options; current directors and executive officers as a group (14 persons)—389,963 shares under Current
Options. Also includes the number of shares of Company common stock to be issued upon the vesting of
restricted stock units within sixty (60) days of March 14, 2019 (the ‘‘Vesting RSUs’’), as follows: Mr. Aldrich—
2,110 shares under Vesting RSUs; Mr. Beebe—2,110 shares under Vesting RSUs; Mr. Furey—2,110 shares
under Vesting RSUs; Mr. Griffin—6,500 shares under Vesting RSUs; Mr. Iyer—2,110 shares under Vesting
RSUs; Ms. King—2,110 shares under Vesting RSUs; Mr. McGlade—2,110 shares under Vesting RSUs;
Mr. McLachlan—2,110 shares under Vesting RSUs; Mr. Schriesheim—2,110 shares under Vesting RSUs;
current directors and executive officers as a group (14 persons)—23,380 shares under Vesting RSUs.
The table does not reflect the number of shares of Company common stock to be issued pursuant to unvested
restricted stock units (the ‘‘Unvested RSUs’’) and earned, but unissued, performance share awards subject to
time-based vesting only (the ‘‘Unvested PSAs’’) that are not scheduled to vest within sixty (60) days of March 14,
2019, as follows: Mr. Bori—21,345 shares under Unvested RSUs and 17,291 shares under Unvested PSAs;
Mr. Gammel—9,493 shares under Unvested RSUs and 11,735 shares under Unvested PSAs; Mr. Griffin—
81,208 shares under Unvested RSUs and 64,937 shares under Unvested PSAs; Mr. Sennesael—34,393 shares
under Unvested RSUs and 17,677 shares under Unvested PSAs; Ms. Stevenson—2,017 shares under Unvested
RSUs; Mr. Terry—13,591 shares under Unvested RSUs and 11,951 shares under Unvested PSAs; current
directors and executive officers as a group (14 persons)—162,047 shares under Unvested RSUs and 123,591
shares under Unvested PSAs.
(3) Consists of shares beneficially owned by The Vanguard Group, Inc. (‘‘Vanguard’’), which has sole voting power
with respect to 216,260 shares, shared voting power with respect to 42,432 shares, sole dispositive power with
respect to 18,530,276 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 254,827 shares. Vanguard Fiduciary
Trust Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of Vanguard, is the beneficial owner of 159,036 shares as a result of
its serving as investment manager of collective trust accounts. Vanguard Investments Australia, Ltd., a wholly
owned subsidiary of Vanguard, is the beneficial owner of 151,156 shares as a result of its serving as investment
manager of Australian investment offerings. With respect to the information relating to Vanguard, the Company
has relied on information supplied by Vanguard on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 11, 2019.
The address of Vanguard is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA, 19355.
(4) Consists of shares beneficially owned by BlackRock, Inc. (‘‘BlackRock’’), in its capacity as a parent holding
company of various subsidiaries under Rule 13d-1(b)(1)(ii)(G). In its capacity as a parent holding company or
control person, BlackRock has sole voting power with respect to 11,522,781 shares and sole dispositive power
with respect to 13,271,115 shares which are held by the following of its subsidiaries: BlackRock Life Limited,
BlackRock International Limited, BlackRock Advisors, LLC, BlackRock (Netherlands) B.V., BlackRock
Institutional Trust Company, National Association, BlackRock Asset Management Ireland Limited, BlackRock
Financial Management, Inc., BlackRock Japan Co., Ltd., BlackRock Asset Management Schweiz AG,
BlackRock Investment Management, LLC, BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Limited, BlackRock
Asset, Management Canada Limited, BlackRock Asset Management Deutschland AG, BlackRock
(Luxembourg) S.A., BlackRock Investment Management (Australia) Limited, BlackRock Advisors (UK)
Limited, BlackRock Fund Advisors, BlackRock Asset Management North Asia Limited, BlackRock (Singapore)
Limited, BlackRock Fund Managers Ltd. With respect to the information relating to BlackRock and its
affiliated entities, the Company has relied on information supplied by BlackRock on a Schedule 13G/A filed
with the SEC on February 6, 2019. The address of BlackRock is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY, 10055.
(5) Consists of shares beneficially owned by Vulcan Value Partners, LLC (‘‘Vulcan’’). Vulcan has sole voting power
with respect to 8,603,813 and sole dispositive power with respect to 9,614,290 shares. With respect to the
information relating to Vulcan, the Company has relied on information supplied by Vulcan on a
65
Proxy Statement Page 65
Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 15, 2019. The address of Vulcan is Three Protective Center,
2801 Highway 280 South, Suite 300, Birmingham, AL, 35223.
(6) Consists of shares beneficially owned by Capital Research Global Investors (‘‘Capital Research’’), a division of
Capital Research and Management Company. Capital Research has sole voting power and sole dispositive
power with respect to 8,802,918 shares. With respect to the information relating to Capital Research, the
Company has relied on information supplied by Capital Research on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on
February 14, 2019. The address of Capital Research is 333 South Hope Street, Los Angeles, CA, 90071.
(7) Includes shares held in the Company’s 401(k) Savings and Investment Plan as of March 14, 2019.
Page 66 Proxy Statement
66
Other Proposed Action
As of the date of this Proxy Statement, the directors know of no other business that is expected to come before
the Annual Meeting. However, if any other business should be properly presented to the Annual Meeting, the persons
named as proxies will vote in accordance with their judgment with respect to such matters.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Other Matters
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors, executive officers and beneficial owners of more than
10% of our equity securities to file reports of holdings and transactions in securities of Skyworks with the SEC. Based
solely on a review of Forms 3, 4, and 5, and any amendments thereto furnished to us, and written representations
provided to us, with respect to fiscal year 2018, we believe that all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to our
directors, executive officers and beneficial owners of more than 10% of the Company’s common stock with respect to
such fiscal year were timely made.
Solicitation Expenses
Skyworks will bear the expenses of the preparation of the proxy materials and the solicitation by the Board of
Directors of proxies. Proxies may be solicited on behalf of the Company in person or by telephone, e-mail, facsimile,
or other electronic means by directors, officers, or employees of the Company, who will receive no additional
compensation for any such services. We have retained D.F. King & Co. to assist in the solicitation of proxies, at a cost
to the Company of approximately $10,500, plus reasonable out-of-pocket expenses.
Electronic Delivery of Proxy Materials
We are able to distribute our Annual Report and this Proxy Statement to our stockholders in a fast and efficient
manner via the Internet. This reduces the amount of paper delivered to a stockholder’s address. Stockholders may
elect to view all future annual reports, proxy statements, and notices on the Internet instead of receiving them by mail.
You may make this election when voting your proxy this year. Simply follow the instructions to vote via the Internet to
register your consent. Your election to view proxy materials online is perpetual unless you revoke it later. Future proxy
cards will contain the Internet website address and instructions to view the materials. You will continue to have the
option to vote your shares by telephone, mail, or via the Internet.
Annual Report on Form 10-K
A copy of our 2018 Annual Report accompanies this Proxy Statement. You also may obtain, free of charge, a copy
of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2018, as filed with the SEC, via the Company’s website
at http://www.skyworksinc.com, or upon written request addressed to Investor Relations, Skyworks Solutions, Inc.,
5221 California Avenue, Irvine, CA 92617.
Stockholder List
A list of stockholders of record as of March 14, 2019, will be available for inspection during ordinary business
hours at our offices at 5221 California Avenue, Irvine, CA 92617, from April 26, 2019, to May 8, 2019, as well as at our
Annual Meeting.
Stockholder Proposals
Proposals to be considered for inclusion in the proxy materials for the Company’s 2020 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act must meet the requirements of Rule 14a-8 and be
delivered in writing to the General Counsel and Secretary of the Company at its executive offices at 5221 California
67
Proxy Statement Page 67
Avenue, Irvine, CA 92617, no later than November 30, 2019. The submission of a stockholder proposal does not
guarantee that it will be included in the proxy materials for the Company’s 2020 Annual Meeting.
According to the applicable provisions of our By-laws, if a stockholder wishes to present a proposal at our 2020
Annual Meeting outside the processes of Rule 14a-8, with such proposal not to be considered for inclusion in the
proxy materials for such meeting, then the stockholder must give written notice to the Secretary of the Company at
the address noted above no earlier than the close of business on January 9, 2020, and no later than the close of
business on February 8, 2020. In the event that the 2020 Annual Meeting is held more than thirty (30) days before or
after the first anniversary of the Company’s 2019 Annual Meeting, then the required notice must be delivered in
writing to the Secretary of the Company at the address above no earlier than 120 days prior to the date of the 2020
Annual Meeting and no later than the later of 90 days prior to the 2020 Annual Meeting or the 10th day following the
day on which the public announcement of the date of the 2020 Annual Meeting is first made by the Company. A
proposal that is submitted outside of these time periods will not be considered to be timely and, pursuant to
Rule 14a-4(c)(1) under the Exchange Act and if a stockholder properly brings the proposal before the meeting, the
proxies that management solicits for that meeting will have ‘‘discretionary’’ authority to vote on the stockholder’s
proposal. Even if a stockholder makes timely notification, the proxies may still exercise ‘‘discretionary’’ authority in
accordance with the SEC’s proxy rules.
OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS ENCOURAGES STOCKHOLDERS TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING.
WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND, YOU ARE URGED TO SUBMIT A PROXY PROMPTLY IN ONE OF
THE FOLLOWING WAYS: (A) BY COMPLETING, SIGNING, AND DATING THE PROXY CARD AND
RETURNING IT IN THE POSTAGE-PREPAID ENVELOPE PROVIDED FOR THAT PURPOSE; (B) BY
COMPLETING AND SUBMITTING YOUR PROXY USING THE TOLL-FREE TELEPHONE NUMBER LISTED
ON THE PROXY CARD; OR (C) BY COMPLETING AND SUBMITTING YOUR PROXY VIA THE INTERNET BY
VISITING THE WEBSITE ADDRESS LISTED ON THE PROXY CARD. A PROMPT RESPONSE WILL GREATLY
FACILITATE ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE MEETING AND YOUR COOPERATION WILL BE APPRECIATED.
Page 68 Proxy Statement
68
Appendix A:
Unaudited Reconciliations of
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
GAAP operating income
Share-based compensation expense
Acquisition-related expenses (benefit)[a]
Amortization of intangibles
Impairment and restructuring-related charges[b]
Litigation settlement gains, losses and expenses
Deferred executive compensation (benefit)[c]
Non-GAAP operating income
GAAP operating margin %
Non-GAAP operating margin %
GAAP operating income
Share-based compensation expense
Acquisition-related expenses[a]
Amortization of intangibles
Impairment and restructuring-related charges
(benefit)[b]
Litigation settlement gains, losses and expenses
Deferred executive compensation[c]
Non-GAAP operating income
GAAP operating margin %
Non-GAAP operating margin %
Year Ended
Sept. 28,
2018
Sept. 29,
2017
Sept. 30,
2016
Oct. 2,
2015
Oct. 3,
2014
$ 1,319.3
107.8
(2.6)
20.7
6.0
—
(1.7)
(In millions, except per share amounts)
$ 1,253.8
$ 1,023.1
$ 1,118.7
99.9
78.0
88.5
8.4
7.5
4.6
33.5
33.4
27.6
3.4
4.8
0.6
3.0
1.7
4.0
0.1
0.6
—
$
$ 1,449.5
$ 1,379.1
$ 1,244.7
$ 1,171.4
$
34.1%
37.5%
34.3%
37.8%
34.0%
37.8%
31.4%
36.0%
565.2
86.0
5.7
25.9
0.3
3.9
—
687.0
24.7%
30.0%
Year Ended
Sept. 27,
2013
Sept. 28,
2012
Sept. 30,
2011
Oct. 1,
2010
Oct. 2,
2009
$
$
345.1
71.7
2.1
29.1
6.4
1.8
0.5
$
255.6
72.2
9.7
32.8
7.8
5.8
0.5
$
295.3
58.3
9.0
16.8
2.4
2.3
0.6
$
199.7
40.7
—
6.1
(1.0)
—
0.8
71.7
23.5
—
6.1
19.5
—
0.1
$
456.7
$
384.4
$
384.7
$
246.3
$
120.9
19.3%
25.5%
16.3%
24.5%
20.8%
27.1%
18.6%
23.0%
8.9%
15.1%
69
Appendix A Page 69
Year Ended
Sept. 28,
2018
Sept. 29,
2017
Sept. 30,
2016
Oct. 2,
2015
Oct. 3,
2014
GAAP net income per share, diluted
Share-based compensation expense
Acquisition-related expenses (benefit)[a]
Amortization of intangibles
Impairment and restructuring-related charges[b]
Litigation settlement gains, losses and expenses
Deferred executive compensation (benefit)[c]
PMC-Sierra merger termination fee
Interest expense on seller-financed debt[d]
Tax adjustments[e]
$
$
5.01
0.59
(0.01)
0.11
0.03
—
(0.01)
—
—
1.50
Non-GAAP net income per share, diluted
$
7.22
$
5.41
0.48
0.02
0.15
—
0.02
—
—
—
0.37
6.45
$
$
5.18
0.41
0.04
0.17
0.02
0.01
0.01
(0.46)
0.01
0.18
$
5.57
$
Year Ended
4.10
0.51
0.04
0.17
0.02
0.01
—
—
0.01
0.41
5.27
GAAP net income per share, diluted
Share-based compensation expense
Acquisition-related expenses[a]
Amortization of intangibles
Impairment and restructuring-related charges[b]
Litigation settlement gains, losses and expenses
Tax adjustments[e]
Amortization of discount on convertible debt[f]
Loss on early retirement of convertible debt, net[g]
Non-GAAP net income per share, diluted
Sept. 27,
2013
Sept. 28,
2012
Sept. 30,
2011
Oct. 1,
2010
$
$
1.45
0.37
0.01
0.15
0.03
0.01
0.18
—
—
2.20
$
$
1.05
0.38
0.05
0.17
0.04
0.03
0.18
—
—
1.90
$
$
1.19
0.31
0.05
0.09
0.01
0.01
0.23
—
—
1.89
$
$
0.75
0.22
—
0.04
—
—
0.24
0.01
—
1.26
$
$
$
2.38
0.45
0.03
0.13
—
0.02
—
—
—
0.23
3.24
Oct. 2,
2009
0.55
0.14
—
0.04
0.11
—
(0.17)
—
0.02
$
0.69
[a] Acquisition-related expenses represent charges associated with acquisitions completed or contemplated. The figures
presented for the fiscal years ended September 28, 2018, and September 28, 2012, include offsets of $11.8 million and
$5.4 million, respectively, to record a benefit for fair value adjustments to reduce contingent consideration.
[b]
Impairment and restructuring-related charges represent expenses associated with restructuring plans. The figures
presented for the fiscal years ended September 28, 2018, and October 2, 2009, include $2.8 million and $3.5 million,
respectively for impairment charges.
[c] During the fiscal year ended September 28, 2018, the Company recognized a $1.7 million benefit in deferred executive
compensation related to a reversal of previously accrued deferred executive compensation. Charges recorded in all
prior fiscal years represent accruals for deferred executive compensation.
[d] During the fiscal years ended September 30, 2016, and October 2, 2015, the Company recognized $1.1 million and
$1.3 million, respectively, in interest expense associated with the accretion of the present value of the $76.5 million
liability related to the future purchase of the remaining 34% interest in the joint venture between the Company and
Panasonic Corporation (‘‘Panasonic’’). The Company acquired the remaining 34% interest from Panasonic on
August 1, 2016.
[e] Tax adjustments represent adjustments for the use of net operating losses, research and development tax credit
carryforwards, deferred tax expenses not affecting taxes payable, charges and/or releases of uncertain tax positions, and
tax deductible share-based compensation expense in excess of GAAP share-based compensation expense. The figures
presented for the fiscal years ended September 28, 2018, and September 27, 2013, include amounts related to the
passage of new tax laws.
[f] These charges represent the amortization expense recognized in accordance with ASC 470-20. Approximately
$2.5 million of amortization expense was recognized during the fiscal year ended October 1, 2010.
[g] The net loss of $4.1 million recorded for the fiscal year ended October 2, 2009, represents a $6.1 million loss related to
the early retirement of $17.4 million of the Company’s convertible subordinated notes due in 2010, and a $2.0 million
gain related to the early retirement of $40.5 million of the Company’s convertible subordinated notes due in 2012.
Page 70 Appendix A
70
Discussion Regarding the Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
Our annual report and this proxy statement contain some or all of the following financial measures that have not
been calculated in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (‘‘GAAP’’):
(i) non-GAAP operating income and operating margin and (ii) non-GAAP diluted earnings per share. As set forth in
the ‘‘Unaudited Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures’’ table found above, we derive such non-GAAP
financial measures by excluding certain expenses and other items from the respective GAAP financial measure that is
most directly comparable to each non-GAAP financial measure. Management uses these non-GAAP financial
measures to evaluate our operating performance and compare it against past periods, make operating decisions,
forecast for future periods, compare our operating performance against peer companies and determine payments
under certain compensation programs. These non-GAAP financial measures provide management with additional
means to understand and evaluate the operating results and trends in our ongoing business by eliminating certain
non-recurring expenses and other items that management believes might otherwise make comparisons of our ongoing
business with prior periods and competitors more difficult, obscure trends in ongoing operations or reduce
management’s ability to make forecasts.
We provide investors with non-GAAP operating income and operating margin and non-GAAP diluted earnings
per share because we believe it is important for investors to be able to closely monitor and understand changes in our
ability to generate income from ongoing business operations. We believe these non-GAAP financial measures give
investors an additional method to evaluate historical operating performance and identify trends, an additional means
of evaluating period-over-period operating performance and a method to facilitate certain comparisons of our
operating results to those of our peer companies. We also believe that providing non-GAAP operating income and
operating margin allows investors to assess the extent to which our ongoing operations impact our overall financial
performance. We further believe that providing non-GAAP diluted earnings per share allows investors to assess the
overall financial performance of our ongoing operations by eliminating the impact of share-based compensation
expense, acquisition-related expenses, amortization of acquisition-related intangibles, certain impairment and
restructuring-related charges,
losses and expenses, certain deferred executive
compensation, merger termination fees, interest expense on seller-financed debt, amortization of discount on
convertible debt, certain financing decisions related to our convertible debt, and certain tax items which may not occur
in each period presented and which may represent non-cash items unrelated to our ongoing operations. We believe
that disclosing these non-GAAP financial measures contributes to enhanced financial reporting transparency and
provides investors with added clarity about complex financial performance measures.
litigation settlement gains,
We calculate non-GAAP operating income by excluding from GAAP operating income, share-based
compensation expense, acquisition-related expenses, amortization of acquisition-related
intangibles, certain
impairment and restructuring-related charges, litigation settlement gains, losses and expenses, and deferred executive
compensation. We calculate non-GAAP diluted earnings per share by excluding from GAAP diluted earnings per
share, share-based compensation expense, acquisition-related expenses, amortization of acquisition-related
intangibles, certain impairment and restructuring-related charges, litigation settlement gains, losses and expenses,
certain deferred executive compensation, merger termination fees, interest expense on seller-financed debt,
amortization of discount on convertible debt, certain financing decisions related to our convertible debt and certain
tax items. We exclude the items identified above from the respective non-GAAP financial measure referenced above
for the reasons set forth with respect to each such excluded item below:
Share-Based Compensation—because (1) the total amount of expense is partially outside of our control because it
is based on factors such as stock price volatility and interest rates, which may be unrelated to our performance during
the period in which the expense is incurred, (2) it is an expense based upon a valuation methodology premised on
assumptions that vary over time, and (3) the amount of the expense can vary significantly between companies due to
factors that can be outside of the control of such companies.
Acquisition-Related Expenses—including such items as, when applicable, amortization of acquired intangible
assets, fair value adjustments to contingent consideration, fair value charges incurred upon the sale of acquired
inventory, acquisition-related professional fees, deemed compensation expenses and interest expense on seller-
financed debt, because they are not considered by management in making operating decisions and we believe that
such expenses do not have a direct correlation to our future business operations and thereby including such charges
71
Appendix A Page 71
does not accurately reflect the performance of our ongoing operations for the period in which such charges are
incurred.
Impairment and Restructuring-Related Charges—these charges have no direct correlation to our future business
operations and including such charges does not necessarily reflect the performance of our ongoing operations for the
period in which such charges are incurred.
Litigation Settlement Gains, Losses and Expenses—including gains, losses and expenses related to the resolution of
other-than-ordinary-course threatened and actually filed lawsuits and other-than-ordinary-course contractual
disputes, because (1) they are not considered by management in making operating decisions, (2) such litigation has
been infrequent in nature, (3) such gains, losses and expenses are generally not directly controlled by management,
(4) we believe such gains, losses and expenses do not necessarily reflect the performance of our ongoing operations
for the period in which such charges are recognized and (5) the amount of such gains or losses and expenses can vary
significantly between companies and make comparisons less reliable.
Deferred Executive Compensation—including charges related to any contingent obligation pursuant to an
executive severance agreement, because we believe the period over which the obligation is amortized may not reflect
the period of benefit and that such expense has no direct correlation with our recurring business operations and
including such expenses does not accurately reflect the compensation expense for the period in which incurred.
Merger Termination Fees—because we believe such non-recurring fees have no direct correlation to our business
operations or performance during the period in which they are received or for any future period.
Gains and Losses on Retirement of Convertible Debt—because, to the extent that gains or losses from such
repurchases impact a period presented, we do not believe that they reflect the underlying performance of ongoing
business operations for such period.
Amortization of Discount on Convertible Debt—comprised of the amortization of the debt discount recorded at
inception of the convertible debt borrowing related to the adoption of ASC 470-20, because the expense is dependent
on fair value assessments and is not considered by management when making operating decisions.
Certain Income Tax Items—including certain deferred tax charges and benefits that do not result in a current tax
payment or tax refund and other adjustments, including but not limited to, items unrelated to the current fiscal year or
that are not indicative of our ongoing business operations.
The non-GAAP financial measures presented in the table above should not be considered in isolation and are not
an alternative for the respective GAAP financial measure that is most directly comparable to each such non-GAAP
financial measure. Investors are cautioned against placing undue reliance on these non-GAAP financial measures and
are urged to review and consider carefully the adjustments made by management to the most directly comparable
GAAP financial measures to arrive at these non-GAAP financial measures. Non-GAAP financial measures may have
limited value as analytical tools because they may exclude certain expenses that some investors consider important in
evaluating our operating performance or ongoing business performance. Further, non-GAAP financial measures are
likely to have limited value for purposes of drawing comparisons between companies because different companies may
calculate similarly titled non-GAAP financial measures in different ways because non-GAAP measures are not based
on any comprehensive set of accounting rules or principles.
Page 72 Appendix A
72
Fiscal Year 2018 Annual Report and
Consolidated Financial Statements
19MAR201913333406
Table of Contents
Cautionary Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Industry Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Business Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Selected Financial Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated Statements of Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated Balance Sheets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity
Securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Comparative Stock Performance Graph . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
74
76
76
77
80
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
119
121
121
123
Cautionary Statement
This Annual Report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended (the ‘‘Securities Act’’), and Section 21E of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the ‘‘Exchange Act’’), and is subject to the ‘‘safe harbor’’ created by those sections. Any statements that are not
statements of historical fact should be considered to be forward-looking statements. Words such as ‘‘anticipates’’,
‘‘predicts’’,
‘‘believes’’,
‘‘projects’’, ‘‘seek’’, ‘‘should’’, ‘‘targets’’, ‘‘will’’, ‘‘would’’, and similar expressions or variations or negatives of such
words are intended to identify forward-looking statements, but are not the exclusive means of identifying forward-
looking statements in this Annual Report. Additionally, forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:
‘‘estimates’’,
‘‘potential’’,
‘‘continue’’,
‘‘expects’’,
‘‘intends’’,
‘‘could’’,
‘‘plans’’,
‘‘may’’,
• our plans to develop and market new products, enhancements or technologies and the timing of these
development and marketing plans;
• our estimates regarding our capital requirements and our needs for additional financing;
• our estimates of our expenses, future revenues and profitability;
• our estimates of the size of the markets for our products and services;
• our expectations related to the rate and degree of market acceptance of our products; and
• our estimates of the success of other competing technologies that may become available.
Although forward-looking statements in this Annual Report reflect the good faith judgment of our management,
such statements can only be based on facts and factors currently known and understood by us. Consequently, forward-
looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties and actual financial results and outcomes may differ
materially and adversely from the results and outcomes discussed in or anticipated by the forward-looking statements.
A number of important factors could cause actual financial results to differ materially and adversely from those in the
forward-looking statements. We urge you to consider the risks and uncertainties discussed elsewhere in this report and
in the other documents filed by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’) in evaluating our forward-
looking statements. We have no plans, and undertake no obligation, to revise or update our forward-looking
statements to reflect any event or circumstance that may arise after the date of this report. We caution readers not to
place undue reliance upon any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made.
Page 74 Annual Report
74
This Annual Report also contains estimates made by independent parties and by us relating to market size and
growth and other industry data. These estimates involve a number of assumptions and limitations and you are
cautioned not to give undue weight to such estimates. In addition, projections, assumptions and estimates of our
future performance and the future performance of the industries in which we operate are necessarily subject to a high
degree of uncertainty and risk due to a variety of important factors, including those described in ‘‘Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations’’. These and other factors could cause
results to differ materially and adversely from those expressed in the estimates made by the independent parties and
by us.
In this document, the words ‘‘we’’, ‘‘our’’, ‘‘ours’’, ‘‘us’’, ‘‘Skyworks’’, and ‘‘the Company’’ refer only to Skyworks
Solutions, Inc., and its consolidated subsidiaries and not any other person or entity. In addition, the following is a list
of industry standards that may be referenced throughout the document:
• BiFET (Bipolar Field Effect Transistor): integrates indium gallium phosphide based heterojunction bipolar
transistors with field effect transistors on the same gallium arsenide substrate
• DC (Direct Current): unidirectional flow of an electrical charge
• CMOS (Complementary Metal Oxide Semiconductor): a technology of constructing integrated circuits
• GaAs (Gallium Arsenide): a compound of the elements gallium and arsenic that is used in the production of
semiconductors
• HBT (Heterojunction Bipolar Transistor): a type of bipolar junction transistor which uses differing
semiconductor materials for the emitter and base regions, creating a heterojunction
• IoT (Internet of Things): is the interconnection of uniquely identifiable embedded computing devices within
the existing internet infrastructure
• LED (Light Emitting Diode): a two-lead semiconductor light source
• LTE (Long Term Evolution): 4th generation (‘‘4G’’) radio technologies designed to increase the capacity and
speed of mobile telephone networks
• pHEMT (Pseudomorphic High Electron Mobility Transistor): a type of field effect transistor incorporating a
junction between two materials with different band gaps
• RF (Radio Frequency): electromagnetic wave frequencies that lie in the range extending from around 3 kHz to
300 GHz
• SAW (Surface Acoustic Wave): electrical input signal is converted to an acoustic wave for filtering and
converted back into an electrical signal by interdigitated transducers on a piezoelectric substrate.
• SOI (Silicon On Insulator): technology refers to the use of layered silicon-insulator-silicon substrate in place of
conventional silicon substrates in semiconductor manufacturing
• TC-SAW (Temperature Compensated Surface Acoustic Wave): SAW filters that have been designed to reduce
shift in frequency over temperature.
Skyworks and the Skyworks symbol are trademarks or registered trademarks of Skyworks Solutions, Inc. or its
subsidiaries in the United States and other countries. Third-party brands and names are for identification purposes
only, and are the property of their respective owners.
75
Annual Report Page 75
Introduction
Skyworks Solutions, Inc., together with its consolidated subsidiaries (‘‘Skyworks’’ or the ‘‘Company’’), is
empowering the wireless networking revolution. The Company’s highly innovative analog semiconductors are
connecting people, places, and things, spanning a number of new and previously unimagined applications within the
aerospace, automotive, broadband, cellular infrastructure, connected home, industrial, medical, military, smartphone,
tablet and wearable markets.
Our key customers include Amazon, Apple, Arris, Bose, Cisco, DJI, Ericsson, Foxconn, Garmin, Gemalto,
General Electric, Google, Honeywell, HTC, Huawei, Itron, Lenovo, LG Electronics, Microsoft, Motorola, Netgear,
Northrop Grumman, OPPO, Rockwell Collins, Samsung, Sierra Wireless, Sonos, Technicolor, VIVO, Xiaomi and
ZTE. Our competitors include Analog Devices, Broadcom, Maxim Integrated Products, Murata Manufacturing, NXP
Semiconductors, QUALCOMM and Qorvo.
We are a Delaware corporation that was formed in 1962. We changed our corporate name from Alpha
Industries, Inc. to Skyworks Solutions, Inc. on June 25, 2002, following a business combination. We operate worldwide
with engineering, manufacturing, sales and service facilities throughout Asia, Europe and North America. Our
Internet address is www.skyworksinc.com. We make available free of charge on our website our Annual Report,
quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports as soon as
practicable after we electronically submit such material to the SEC. The information contained on our website is not
incorporated by reference in this Annual Report. Our SEC filings are also available to the public at www.sec.gov.
In August 2018, we acquired Avnera Corporation (‘‘Avnera’’) and expanded our leadership in wireless
connectivity by adding ultra-low power analog circuits to enable smart interfaces via acoustic signal processing, sensors
and integrated software. We expect the acquisition of Avnera to enable us to capitalize on the rapid proliferation of
audio functionality and its convergence with our advanced connectivity solutions. With our global sales channels,
strong customer relationships and operational scale, we plan to leverage Avnera’s innovative product portfolio and
systems expertise to increase our footprint in automotive, industrial, home automation, enterprise and high-end
consumer markets.
In August 2016, we acquired the remaining 34 percent interest in a joint venture that was initially created in
August 2014 with Panasonic Corporation, through its Automotive & Industrial Systems Company (‘‘Panasonic’’) for
the design, manufacture and sale of Panasonic’s SAW and TC-SAW filter products. The joint venture was dissolved
and is now a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. With the overall demand for SAW and TC-SAW filters
increasing and as technology and product architectures become more complex and the number of required bands
grows, this investment assists us in securing a consistent supply of SAW and TC-SAW filters, in addition to allowing us
to integrate filters into the design and production of our own products.
Industry Background
Mobile connectivity is exploding on a global basis. With wireless platforms serving as virtual hubs for
e-commerce, enterprise to the cloud, social media, gaming and entertainment, these devices are enabling a new, multi-
trillion dollar economy. Popular apps including Amazon, Facebook, Netflix, Spotify, Uber, Waze and YouTube all
require ultra-fast, highly secure, low-latency, always-on connectivity plus GPS location-based services. As a result,
semiconductor solutions are becoming increasingly relevant, resolving the daunting analog and RF complexities that
are challenging the capabilities of existing hardware and the supporting network infrastructure. Semiconductor
devices continue becoming smaller, more powerful, and easier to integrate across multiple communication protocols,
which in turn is enabling mobile and IoT ecosystems.
Skyworks facilitates ubiquitous data creation, delivery and storage as smartphones transmit and receive immense
amounts of content supporting multimedia streaming, social networking, virtual reality and emerging frictionless
commerce. To enable these applications, we deliver highly integrated solutions leveraging our amplification, filtering,
tuning, power management, audio processing and packaging capabilities to continuously push the performance
envelope.
Page 76 Annual Report
76
Demand for connectivity across emerging markets around the world also continues to grow as the industry drives
toward connecting the billions of people who remain unconnected. According to The GSMA Foundation, there will be
5.9 billion mobile subscribers by 2025, representing almost three-quarters of the world’s population. Subscriber growth
over this period is forecast to be driven primarily by large markets in Asia, such as India, which alone is expected to
add 310 million new unique subscribers by 2020.
At the same time, connectivity is proliferating into an adjacent set of IoT markets. From smart homes to the
smart grid and from industrial to wearables, the number of connected devices is rapidly proliferating. In fact, IHS
Markit Ltd. projects the IoT market to grow from an installed base of 15 billion units in 2015 to more than 75 billion
units by 2025. Skyworks is enabling these opportunities with highly customized system solutions supporting a broad set
of wireless protocols including cellular LTE, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth(cid:4), LoRa(cid:4), Thread and Zigbee(cid:4).
Looking ahead to 5G, we see a market that presents a massive growth opportunity for our industry and certainly
for Skyworks. 5G data rates will approach ten to 100 times the fastest 4G speeds of today with near zero latency. To
put this in perspective, downloading a full-length HD movie in 3G took one day; in 4G, the same file took minutes. On
a 5G network, this content will be downloaded in mere seconds. By 2020 a single autonomous car is expected to
consume 4,000 gigabytes of data per day in real-time diagnostics, positioning and vehicle-to-vehicle communications—
that is equivalent to the daily data consumed by more than 2,000 smartphone users today.
We expect the key catalysts for Skyworks to be the insatiable demand for data and the profitable usage model for
both Mobile and IoT applications, as each connection becomes more valuable and vital particularly as the world
embraces 5G.
Solving Connectivity Challenges
The transition to ubiquitous connectivity creates challenges to existing architectures. RF solutions in ultra-thin,
high performance consumer products must increase data rates, solve signal interference problems, and occupy
minimal board space while at the same time increasing battery life. Meeting these design challenges requires broad
competencies including signal transmission and conditioning, the ability to ensure seamless hand-offs between
multiple standards, power management, voltage regulation, battery charging, filtering and tuning, among others. This
complexity plays directly to our strengths. We have a strong heritage in analog systems design and have spent the last
decade investing in key technologies and resources. We are at the forefront of advanced multi-chip module integration
and offer unmatched technology breadth, providing deep expertise in CMOS, SOI, GaAs and filters, and maintain
strategic partnerships with outside independent wafer fabrication facilities.
Our ambitious vision is to connect everyone and everything, all the time. To this end, key elements of our strategy
Business Overview
include:
Industry-Leading Technology
As the industry migrates to more complex LTE and 5G architectures across a multitude of wireless broadband
applications, we are uniquely positioned to help mobile device manufacturers handle growing levels of system
complexity in the transmit and receive chain. The trend towards increasing front-end and analog design challenges in
smartphones and other mobile devices plays directly into our core strengths and positions us to address these
challenges. We believe that we offer the broadest portfolio of radio and analog solutions from the transceiver to the
antenna as well as all required manufacturing process technologies. We also hold strong technology leadership
positions in passive devices, advanced integration including proprietary shielding and 3-D die stacking as well as SAW
and TC-SAW filters. Our product portfolio is reinforced by a library of approximately 3,000 worldwide patents and
other intellectual property that we own and control. Together, our industry-leading technology enables us to deliver
the highest levels of product performance and integration.
77
Annual Report Page 77
Customer Relationships
Given our scale and technology leadership, we are engaged with key original equipment manufacturers
(‘‘OEMs’’), smartphone providers and baseband reference design partners. Our customers value our supply chain
strength, our innovative technology and our system engineering expertise, resulting in deep customer loyalty. We
partner with our customers to support their long-term product road maps and are valued as a system solutions
provider rather than just a point product vendor.
Diversification
We are diversifying our business in three areas: our addressed markets, our customer base and our product
offerings. By leveraging core analog and mixed signal technologies, we are expanding our family of solutions to a set of
increasingly diverse end markets and customers. We are steadily growing our business beyond just mobile devices
(where we support all top-tier manufacturers, including the leading smartphone suppliers and key baseband vendors)
into additional high-performance analog markets, including automotive, home and factory automation, infrastructure,
medical, smart energy and wireless networking. In these markets we leverage our scale, intellectual property and
worldwide distribution network, which spans over 2,500 customers and over 2,500 analog components.
Delivering Operational Excellence
We vertically integrate our supply chain where we can differentiate with highly specialized internal manufacturing
capabilities, or enter into alliances and strategic relationships for leading-edge technologies. This hybrid
manufacturing model allows us to better balance our manufacturing capacity with the demand of the marketplace.
Our internal capacity utilization remains high, resulting in an increase of our gross margin and the return on invested
capital on a broader range of revenue.
Additionally, we continue to drive reductions in product design and manufacturing cycle times and further
improve product yields. The combination of agile, flexible capacity and world-class module manufacturing and scale
advantage allows us to achieve low product costs while integrating multiple technologies into highly sophisticated
multi-chip modules.
Maintaining a Performance Driven Culture
We consider our people and corporate culture to be a major competitive advantage and a key driver of our
overall strategy. We create key performance indicators that align employee efforts with corporate strategy and link
responsibilities with performance measurement. Accountability is paramount and we compensate our employees
through a pay-for-performance methodology. We strive to be an employer-of-choice among peer companies and have
created a work environment in which turnover is below geographic and industry averages.
Generating Superior Operating Results and Shareholder Returns
We seek to generate financial returns that are comparable to a highly diversified analog semiconductor company.
Given our product volume and overall utilization we strive to achieve a best-in-class return on investment and
operating income to reward shareholders.
OUR PRODUCT PORTFOLIO
Our product portfolio consists of various solutions, including:
• Amplifiers: the modules that strengthen the signal so that it has sufficient energy to reach a base station
• Antenna Tuners: aperture and impedance tuning products that improve antenna performance across
frequencies
• Attenuators: circuits that allow a known source of power to be reduced by a predetermined factor (usually
expressed as decibels)
• Circulators/Isolators: ferrite-based components commonly found on the output of high-power amplifiers used
to protect receivers in wireless transmission systems
Page 78 Annual Report
78
• DC/DC Converters: an electronic circuit which converts a source of direct current from one voltage level to
another
• Demodulators: a device or an RF block used in receivers to extract the information that has been modulated
onto a carrier or from the carrier itself
• Detectors: devices used to measure and control RF power in wireless systems
• Diodes: semiconductor devices that pass current in one direction only
• Directional Couplers: transmission coupling devices for separately sampling the forward or backward wave in a
transmission line
• Diversity Receive Modules: devices used to improve receiver sensitivity in high data rate applications
• Filters: devices for recovering and separating mixed and modulated data in RF stages
• Front-end Modules: two or more functions co-packaged to optimize the performance, cost and application
suitability in products, including intermediate or radio frequency signal paths
• Hybrid: a type of directional coupler used in radio and telecommunications
• LED Drivers: devices which regulate the current through a light emitting diode or string of diodes for the
purpose of creating light
• Low Noise Amplifiers: devices used to reduce system noise figure in the receive chain
• Mixers: devices that enable signals to be converted to a higher or lower frequency signal and thereby allowing
the signals to be processed more effectively
• Modulators: devices that take a baseband input signal and output a radio frequency modulated signal
• Optocouplers/Optoisolators: semiconductor devices that allow signals to be transferred between circuits or
systems while ensuring that the circuits or systems are electrically isolated from each other
• Phase Locked Loops: closed-loop feedback control system that maintains a generated signal in a fixed phase
relationship to a reference signal
• Phase Shifters: designed for use in power amplifier distortion compensation circuits in base station applications
• Power Dividers/Combiners: utilized to equally split signals into in-phase signals as often found in balanced
signal chains and local oscillator distribution networks
• Receivers: electronic devices that change a radio signal from a transmitter into useful information
• Switches: components that perform the change between the transmit and receive function, as well as the band
function for cellular handsets
• Synthesizers: devices that provide ultra-fine frequency resolution, fast switching speed, and low phase-noise
performance
• Technical Ceramics: polycrystalline oxide materials used for a wide variety of electrical, mechanical, thermal
and magnetic applications
• Voltage Controlled Oscillators/Synthesizers: fully integrated, high performance signal source for high dynamic
range transceivers
• Voltage Regulators: generate a fixed level which ideally remains constant over varying input voltage or load
conditions
We believe we possess broad technology capabilities and one of the most complete wireless communications
product portfolios in the industry.
79
Annual Report Page 79
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in
conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes that appear elsewhere in this Annual Report. In
addition to historical information, the following discussion contains forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and
uncertainties. Actual results may differ substantially and adversely from those referred to herein due to a number of factors,
including, but not limited to, those described below and elsewhere in this Annual Report.
OVERVIEW
We, together with our consolidated subsidiaries, are empowering the wireless networking revolution. Our highly
innovative analog semiconductors are connecting people, places, and things spanning a number of new and previously
unimagined applications within the aerospace, automotive, broadband, cellular infrastructure, connected home,
industrial, medical, military, smartphone, tablet and wearable markets. Our key customers include Amazon, Apple,
Arris, Bose, Cisco, DJI, Ericsson, Foxconn, Garmin, Gemalto, General Electric, Google, Honeywell, HTC, Huawei,
Itron, Lenovo, LG Electronics, Microsoft, Motorola, Netgear, Northrop Grumman, OPPO, Rockwell Collins,
Samsung, Sierra Wireless, Sonos, Technicolor, VIVO, Xiaomi and ZTE.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
FISCAL YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 28, 2018, SEPTEMBER 29, 2017, AND SEPTEMBER 30, 2016.
The following table sets forth the results of our operations expressed as a percentage of net revenue:
Net revenue
Cost of goods sold
Gross profit
Operating expenses:
Research and development
Selling, general and administrative
Amortization of intangibles
Restructuring and other charges
Total operating expenses
Operating income
Other income (expense), net
Merger termination fee
Income before income taxes
Provision for income taxes
Net income
September 28,
2018
September 29,
2017
September 30,
2016
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
49.6
50.4
10.4
5.4
0.5
—
16.3
34.1
0.3
—
34.4
10.7
49.6
50.4
9.7
5.6
0.8
—
16.1
34.3
0.1
—
34.4
6.7
49.4
50.6
9.5
6.0
1.0
0.1
16.6
34.0
(0.2)
2.7
36.5
6.2
23.7%
27.7%
30.3%
GENERAL
During the fiscal year ended September 28, 2018, the following key factors contributed to our overall results of
operations, financial position and cash flows:
• Net revenue increased to approximately $3,868.0 million, an increase of 6% as compared to the prior fiscal
year. This increase in revenue was primarily driven by our success in capturing a higher share of the increasing
radio frequency and analog content per device as smartphone models continue to evolve, increases in
applications for the IoT, and the expanding analog product portfolio supporting new vertical markets including
aerospace, automotive, industrial, medical and military.
Page 80 Annual Report
80
• Our ending cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities balance decreased 35.0% to $1,050.2 million in
fiscal 2018 from $1,616.8 million in fiscal 2017. This was the result of a 13% decrease in cash from operations
to $1,260.6 million in fiscal 2018 from $1,456.3 million in fiscal 2017 due to a $221.9 million increase in cash
used for working capital. In addition, we returned $1,002.7 million to shareholders through repurchasing
7.7 million shares of our common stock for $759.5 million together with payments of $243.2 million in cash
dividends. Lastly, we invested approximately $422.3 million in capital expenditures and $404.0 million in
payments for acquisitions.
NET REVENUE
(dollars in millions)
Net revenue
September 28,
2018
$
3,868.0
Fiscal Years Ended
September 29,
2017
Change
Change
September 30,
2016
5.9% $
3,651.4
11.0% $
3,289.0
We market and sell our products directly to OEMs of communications and electronics products, third-party
original design manufacturers and contract manufacturers, and indirectly through electronic components distributors.
We generally experience seasonal peaks during the second half of the calendar year, primarily as a result of increased
worldwide production of consumer electronics in anticipation of increased holiday sales, whereas our second and third
fiscal quarter is typically lower and in line with seasonal industry trends.
The $216.6 million increase in revenue in fiscal 2018 as compared to fiscal 2017 and the $362.4 million increase in
revenue in fiscal 2017 as compared to fiscal 2016 were primarily driven by our success in capturing a higher share of
the increasing radio frequency and analog content per device as smartphones models continue to evolve, the
increasing number of applications for the IoT, and our expanding analog product portfolio supporting new vertical
markets including automotive, industrial, medical and military.
For information regarding net revenue by geographic region and customer concentration, see Note 17 of this
Annual Report.
GROSS PROFIT
(dollars in millions)
Gross profit
% of net revenue
September 28,
2018
$
1,950.7
50.4%
Fiscal Years Ended
September 29,
2017
Change
5.9% $
1,841.8
50.4%
Change
September 30,
2016
10.6% $
1,665.2
50.6%
Gross profit represents net revenue less cost of goods sold. Our cost of goods sold consists primarily of purchased
materials, labor and overhead (including depreciation and share-based compensation expense) associated with
product manufacturing. Erosion of average selling prices of established products is typical of the semiconductor
industry. Consistent with trends in the industry, we anticipate that average selling prices for our established products
will continue to decline over time. As part of our normal course of business, we mitigate the gross margin impact of
declining average selling prices with efforts to increase unit volumes, reduce material costs, improve manufacturing
efficiencies, lower manufacturing costs of existing products and by introducing new and higher value-added products.
Gross profit was $108.9 million higher in fiscal 2018 as compared to fiscal 2017. The increase in gross profit was
primarily the result of higher unit volumes, lower overall per-unit material and manufacturing costs, and favorable
product mix, with an aggregate gross profit benefit of $267.1 million. These benefits were partially offset by the
erosion of average selling price that negatively impacted gross profit by $158.2 million. Gross profit margin remained
consistent at 50.4% of net revenue for fiscal 2018.
Gross profit was $176.6 million greater in fiscal 2017 as compared to fiscal 2016. The increase in gross profit was
primarily the result of higher unit volumes and lower overall per-unit material and manufacturing costs, with an
aggregate gross profit benefit of $306.6 million. These benefits were partially offset by the erosion of average selling
price and changes in product mix that combined to negatively impact gross profit by $130.0 million. As a result of
these impacts, gross profit margin decreased to 50.4% of net revenue for fiscal 2017.
81
Annual Report Page 81
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
(dollars in millions)
Research and development
% of net revenue
September 28,
2018
$
404.5
10.4%
Fiscal Years Ended
September 29,
2017
Change
13.9% $
355.2
9.7%
Change
September 30,
2016
13.7% $
312.4
9.5%
Research and development expenses consist primarily of direct personnel costs including share-based
compensation expense, costs for pre-production evaluation and testing of new devices, masks, engineering prototypes
and design tool costs.
The increase in research and development expense in fiscal 2018 as compared to fiscal 2017 is primarily related to
increased headcount, overall employee-related compensation expense, and expenses associated with product
development activity. Research and development expense increased as a percentage of net revenue due to increased
development complexity and our efforts to increase the value of our future products.
The increase in research and development expense in fiscal 2017 as compared to fiscal 2016 is primarily related to
increased headcount, overall employee-related compensation expense, and expenses associated with product
development activity. Research and development expense increased slightly as a percentage of net revenue due to the
aforementioned factors.
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE
(dollars in millions)
Selling, general and administrative
% of net revenue
September 28,
2018
$
207.8
5.4%
Fiscal Years Ended
September 29,
2017
Change
1.6% $
204.6
5.6%
Change
September 30,
2016
4.4% $
195.9
6.0%
Selling, general and administrative expenses include legal and related costs, accounting, treasury, human
resources, information systems, customer service, bad debt expense, sales commissions, share-based compensation
expense, advertising, marketing, costs associated with business combinations completed or contemplated during the
period and other costs.
The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses in fiscal 2018 as compared to fiscal 2017 was
primarily related to increases in employee-related compensation expenses, including share-based compensation,
partially offset by an increase in the net gain related to the fair value adjustment of contingent consideration of
$11.9 million. Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased as a percentage of net revenue primarily due to
the increase in net revenue.
The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses in fiscal 2017 as compared to fiscal 2016 was
primarily related to increases in employee-related compensation expenses, including share-based compensation,
partially offset by lower legal expenses and the net gain related to the fair value adjustment of contingent
consideration of $1.3 million. Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased as a percentage of net revenue
due to the aforementioned factors and the increase in net revenue.
Page 82 Annual Report
82
AMORTIZATION OF INTANGIBLES
(dollars in millions)
Amortization of purchased intangibles
Amortization of capitalized software
Total amortization of intangibles
% of net revenue
September 28,
2018
Change
Fiscal Years Ended
September 29,
2017
Change
September 30,
2016
$
20.7
6.0
26.7
0.7%
(25.0)% $
100.0%
27.6
—
27.6
0.8%
(17.4)% $
—%
33.4
—
33.4
1.0%
During fiscal 2018, $8.4 million and $18.3 million in amortization of intangibles were included in cost of goods
sold and selling, general and administrative expense, respectively. During fiscal 2017, $27.6 million in amortization of
intangibles was included in selling, general and administrative expense.
The decrease in amortization for fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2017, as compared to fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2016,
respectively, primarily relates to fully amortized intangible assets that were acquired in prior years partially offset by
additional intangible assets acquired during the fiscal year.
RESTRUCTURING AND OTHER CHARGES
(dollars in millions)
Restructuring and other charges
% of net revenue
September 28,
2018
Change
Fiscal Years Ended
September 29,
2017
$
0.8
—%
33.3% $
0.6
—%
Change
September 30,
2016
(87.5)% $
4.8
0.1%
Restructuring and other charges incurred in fiscal 2018 are related to charges on a leased facility. We do not
anticipate any further significant charges associated with these restructuring activities and substantially all of the cash
payments related to these restructuring plans have occurred.
Restructuring and other charges incurred in fiscal 2017 are primarily related to restructuring plans initiated
during the period.
MERGER TERMINATION FEE
(dollars in millions)
Merger termination fee
% of net revenue
September 28,
2018
Change
Fiscal Years Ended
September 29,
2017
Change
September 30,
2016
$
—
—%
—% $
—
—%
(100.0)% $
88.5
2.7%
On October 29, 2015, we entered into an Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger (the ‘‘Merger
Agreement’’) with PMC-Sierra, Inc. (‘‘PMC’’), providing for, subject to the terms and conditions of the Merger
Agreement, our cash acquisition of PMC. On November 23, 2015, PMC notified us that it had terminated the Merger
Agreement. As a result, on November 24, 2015, PMC paid us a termination fee of $88.5 million pursuant to the
Merger Agreement.
83
Annual Report Page 83
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
(dollars in millions)
Provision for income taxes
% of net revenue
September 28,
2018
$
413.7
10.7%
Fiscal Years Ended
September 29,
2017
Change
67.6% $
246.8
6.7%
Change
September 30,
2016
20.2% $
205.4
6.2%
The annual effective tax rate for fiscal 2018 of 31.1% was greater than the United States federal statutory rate of
24.6% primarily due to increases in tax from a one-time charge related to the mandatory deemed repatriation tax on
foreign earnings of 16.9%, a one-time charge related to the revaluation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities of
1.4%, and income tax rate expense impact of 0.5% related to a change in our tax reserves, partially offset by benefits
of 8.4% related to foreign earnings taxed at a rate less than the United States federal rate, 1.0% related to a domestic
production activities deduction, 1.9% related to stock windfall deductions, and 1.5% related to the recognition of
federal research and development tax credits.
We operate under a tax holiday in Singapore, which is effective through September 30, 2020. This tax holiday is
conditioned upon our compliance with certain employment and investment thresholds in Singapore. The impact of the
tax holiday decreased the taxes we owe in Singapore by $38.4 million and $37.4 million for fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2017,
respectively. This resulted in tax benefits of $0.21 and $0.20 of diluted earnings per share for fiscal 2018 and fiscal
2017, respectively.
The annual effective tax rate for fiscal 2017 of 19.6% was less than the United States federal statutory rate of
35.0% primarily due to benefits of 14.3% related to foreign earnings taxed at a rate less than the United States federal
rate, 1.6% related to a domestic production activities deduction, and 1.3% related to the recognition of federal
research and development tax credits, partially offset by income tax rate expense impact of 1.0% related to a change in
our tax reserves.
See Note 9 of this Annual Report for a detailed discussion of the impact of the Tax Reform Act.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
(in millions)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
Net cash provided by operating activities
Net cash used in investing activities
Net cash used in financing activities
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
Cash provided by operating activities:
Fiscal Years Ended
September 28,
2018
September 29,
2017
September 30,
2016
$
$
$
1,616.8
1,260.6
(1,150.4)
(993.7)
$
1,083.8
1,456.3
(325.9)
(597.4)
733.3
$
1,616.8
$
1,043.6
1,077.7
(250.9)
(786.6)
1,083.8
Cash provided by operating activities consists of net income for the period adjusted for certain non-cash items
and changes in certain operating assets and liabilities. For fiscal 2018, we generated $1,260.6 million in cash from
operations, a decrease of $195.7 million when compared to $1,456.3 million generated in fiscal 2017. The decrease in
cash from operating activities during fiscal 2018 was primarily related to a $221.9 million increase in cash used for
working capital. Specifically, the increase in uses of cash were: $156.7 million in accounts receivable due to the timing
of customer collections and $273.8 million related to accounts payable, due to the timing of capital expenditures and
vendor payments. These increases in uses of cash were offset by increases in sources of cash of: $143.0 million related
to changes in other current and long-term liabilities primarily related to the unpaid portion of the mandatory deemed
repatriation tax on foreign earnings.
Page 84 Annual Report
84
Cash used in investing activities:
Cash used in investing activities consists primarily of cash paid for acquisitions net of cash acquired, capital
expenditures, purchased intangibles, cash received from the sale of capital assets, and cash related to the sale or
maturity of investments. Cash used in investing activities was $1,150.4 million during fiscal 2018, compared to
$325.9 million during fiscal 2017. The cash used for capital expenditures in fiscal 2018 was $422.3 million, primarily
related to the purchase of manufacturing equipment to support the expansion of our assembly and test operations,
filter production operations, and wafer fabrication facilities. During fiscal 2018, we paid $404.0 million, net of cash
acquired, to complete an acquisition and $315.5 million in net purchases of marketable securities.
Cash used in financing activities:
Cash used in financing activities consists primarily of cash transactions related to equity. During fiscal 2018, we
had net cash outflows of $993.7 million, compared to $597.4 million in fiscal 2017. The increase in cash used in
financing activities primarily related to the increase in share repurchase activity and dividend payments during fiscal
2018. During fiscal 2018 we had the following significant uses of cash:
• $759.5 million related to our repurchase of 7.7 million shares of our common stock pursuant to the share
repurchase programs approved by our Board of Directors on January 31, 2018, and January 17, 2017;
• $243.2 million related to the payment of cash dividends on our common stock; and
• $48.0 million related to the minimum statutory payroll tax withholdings upon vesting of employee performance
and restricted stock awards.
These uses of cash were partially offset by the net proceeds from employee stock option exercises of $38.8 million
and the proceeds from employee stock purchase plans of $18.2 million during fiscal 2018.
Liquidity:
Cash and cash equivalent balances were $733.3 million at September 28, 2018, representing a decrease of
$883.5 million from September 29, 2017. The decrease resulted from $759.5 million used to repurchase 7.7 million
shares of stock, $422.3 million in capital expenditures, $404.0 million related to business acquisition activity,
$315.5 million in net purchases of marketable securities and $243.2 million in cash dividend payments during fiscal
2018, which was partially offset by $1,260.6 million in cash generated from operations. Based on our historical results
of operations, we expect that our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities on hand and the cash we expect to
generate from operations will be sufficient to fund our research and development, capital expenditures, potential
acquisitions, working capital, quarterly cash dividend payments (if such dividends are declared by the Board of
Directors), outstanding commitments and other liquidity requirements associated with existing operations for at least
the next 12 months. However, we cannot be certain that our cash on hand and cash generated from operations will be
available in the future to fund all of our capital and operating requirements. In addition, any future strategic
investments and acquisitions may require additional cash and capital resources. If we are unable to obtain sufficient
cash or capital to meet our needs on a timely basis and on favorable terms, our business and operations could be
materially and adversely affected.
Our invested cash balances primarily consist of highly liquid marketable securities that are available to meet
near-term cash requirements including: term deposits, certificate of deposits, money market funds, U.S. Treasury
securities, agency securities, other government securities, corporate debt securities and commercial paper.
We had $300.6 million of cash and cash equivalents located in foreign jurisdictions at September 28, 2018.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
All significant contractual obligations are recorded on our consolidated balance sheet or fully disclosed in the
notes to our consolidated financial statements. We have no material off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in SEC
Regulation S-K-303(a)(4)(ii).
85
Annual Report Page 85
CONTRACTUAL CASH FLOWS
Set forth below is a summary of our contractual payment obligations related to our operating leases, other
commitments and long-term liabilities at September 28, 2018 (in millions):
Payments Due By Period
Obligation
Other long-term liabilities(1)
Operating lease obligations
Contingent consideration for business
combinations(2)
Other commitments(3)
Total
Total
Less Than
1 Year
1-3 Years
3-5 Years
Thereafter
$
$
308.6
86.8
$
3.1
15.0
413.5
$
5.5
21.6
3.1
12.5
42.7
$
$
36.9
32.5
—
2.5
$
$
36.9
17.5
—
—
229.3
15.2
—
—
71.9
$
54.4
$
244.5
(1) Other long-term liabilities primarily include our gross unrecognized tax benefits, as well as executive deferred
compensation, which are both classified as beyond five years due to the uncertain nature of the liabilities.
(2) Contingent consideration related to business combinations is recorded at fair value and actual results could
differ. See Note 3 and Note 5 of this Annual Report for further detail.
(3) Other commitments consist of contractual license and royalty payments and other purchase obligations. See
Note 12 of this Annual Report.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated
financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, or
GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments in applying our
most critical accounting policies that can have a significant impact on the results we report in our financial statements.
The SEC has defined critical accounting policies as those that are both most important to the portrayal of our
financial condition and results and which require our most difficult, complex or subjective judgments or estimates.
Based on this definition, our most critical accounting policies include revenue recognition, which impacts the
recording of net revenue; inventory valuation, which impacts the cost of goods sold and gross margin; assessment of
goodwill and long-lived assets, which impacts the impairment of the respective assets; business combinations, which
impacts the fair value of acquired assets and assumed liabilities; share-based compensation, which impacts cost of
goods sold and operating expenses; loss contingencies, which impacts operating expenses; and income taxes, which
impacts the income tax provision. These policies and significant judgments involved are discussed further below. We
have other significant accounting policies that do not generally require subjective estimates or judgments or would not
have a material impact on our results of operations. Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 of this
Annual Report.
Revenue Recognition. We recognize revenue in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s
(‘‘FASB’’) Accounting Standards Codification (‘‘ASC’’) 605 Revenue Recognition net of estimated reserves. Our
revenue reserves contain uncertainties because they require management to make assumptions and to apply judgment
to estimate the value of future credits to customers for product returns, price protection and stock rotation for
products sold to certain electronic component distributors. Our estimates of the amount and timing of the reserves is
based primarily on historical experience and specific contractual arrangements. Refer to Note 2 of this Annual Report
for information about the expected impact of our adoption of ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers
(‘‘Topic 606’’).
Inventory Valuation. We value our inventory at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Reserves for excess and
obsolete inventory are established on a quarterly basis and are based on a detailed analysis of aged material,
forecasted demand in relation to on-hand inventory, salability of our inventory, general market conditions, and
product life cycles. Once reserves are established, write-downs of inventory are considered permanent adjustments to
the cost basis of inventory. Our reserves contain uncertainties because the calculation requires management to make
assumptions and to apply judgment regarding historical experience, forecasted demand and technological
obsolescence. Changes in actual demand or market conditions could adversely impact our reserve calculations.
Page 86 Annual Report
86
Goodwill and Long-Lived Assets. We evaluate goodwill and long-lived assets for impairment annually on the first
day of the fourth fiscal quarter and whenever events or circumstances arise that may indicate that the carrying value of
the goodwill or other intangibles may not be recoverable.
Our impairment analysis contains uncertainties because it requires management to make assumptions and to
apply judgment to items such as: determination of the reporting unit and asset groupings, estimated control
premiums, discount rates, future cash flows, the profitability of future business strategies and useful lives.
Business Combinations. We apply significant estimates and judgments in order to determine the fair value of the
identified tangible and intangible assets acquired, liabilities assumed and goodwill recognized in business
combinations. The value of all assets and liabilities are recognized at fair value as of the acquisition date using a
market participant approach.
In measuring the fair value, we utilize a number of valuation techniques consistent with the market approach,
income approach and/or cost approach. The valuation of the identifiable assets and liabilities includes assumptions
such as projected revenue, royalty rates, weighted average cost of capital, discount rates and estimated useful lives.
These assessments can be significantly affected by our judgments.
Share-Based Compensation. We have share-based compensation plans which include non-qualified stock
options, restricted and performance share awards and units, as well as an employee stock purchase plan and other
special share-based awards. Note 10 of this Annual Report details our current share-based compensation programs.
We determine the fair value of our share-based compensation items with pricing models as of the date of grant
using a number of highly complex and subjective variables and assumptions including, but not limited to: our expected
stock price volatility over the term of the award, correlation coefficients, risk-free rate, the expected life of the award,
dividend yield, and estimated performance against metrics. Compensation expense is recognized over the requisite
service period of the underlying awards. Management periodically evaluates these assumptions and updates share-
based compensation expense accordingly.
Loss Contingencies. We record an estimate for loss contingencies such as a legal proceeding or claims if it is
probable that an asset has been impaired or a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss or range of loss
can be reasonably estimated. We disclose material loss contingencies if there is at least a reasonable possibility that a
loss has been incurred.
Our loss contingency analysis contains uncertainties because it requires management to assess the degree of
probability of an unfavorable outcome and to make a reasonable estimate of the amount of potential loss.
Income Taxes. We account for income taxes using the asset and liability method, under which deferred tax assets
and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between tax and
financial reporting. We record a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is believed more
likely than not to be realized. Significant management judgment is required in developing our provision for income
taxes, including the determination of deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowances that might be
required against the deferred tax assets.
The application of tax laws and regulations to calculate our tax liabilities is subject to legal and factual
interpretation, judgment, and uncertainty in a multitude of jurisdictions. Tax laws and regulations themselves are
subject to change as a result of changes in fiscal policy, changes in legislation, the evolution of regulations, and court
rulings. We recognize potential liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues in the United States and other tax
jurisdictions based on our estimate of whether, and the extent to which, additional taxes and interest will be due. We
record an amount as an estimate of probable additional income tax liability at the largest amount that we feel is more
likely than not, based upon the technical merits of the position, to be sustained upon audit by the relevant tax
authority.
OTHER MATTERS
Inflation did not have a material impact on our results of operations during the three-year period ended
September 28, 2018.
87
Annual Report Page 87
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures
About Market Risk
We are subject to overall financial market risks, such as changes in market liquidity, credit quality, investment
risk, interest rate risk and foreign exchange rate risk as described below.
Investment and Interest Rate Risk
Our exposure to interest rate and general market risks relates principally to our investment portfolio, which
consists of cash and cash equivalents (money market funds and marketable securities purchased with less than ninety
days until maturity) that total approximately $733.3 million and marketable securities (U.S. Treasury and government
securities, corporate bonds and notes, municipal bonds, other government securities) that total approximately
$294.1 million and $22.8 million within short-term and long-term marketable securities, respectively, as of
September 28, 2018.
The main objectives of our investment activities are liquidity and preservation of capital. Our cash equivalent
investments have short-term maturity periods that dampen the impact of market or interest rate risk. Our marketable
securities consist of short-term and long-term maturity periods between 90 days and two years. Credit risk associated
with our investments is not material because our investments are diversified across several types of securities with high
credit ratings, which reduces the amount of credit exposure to any one investment.
Based on our results of operations for the fiscal year ended September 28, 2018, a hypothetical reduction in the
interest rates on our cash, cash equivalents, and other investments to zero would result in an immaterial reduction of
interest income with a de minimis impact on income before taxes.
Given the low interest rate environment, the objectives of our investment activities, and the relatively low interest
income generated from our cash, cash equivalents, and other investments, we do not believe that investment or
interest rate risks pose material exposures to our current business or results of operations.
Foreign Exchange Rate Risk
Substantially all sales to customers and arrangements with third-party manufacturers provide for pricing and
payment in United States dollars, thereby reducing the impact of foreign exchange rate fluctuations on our results. A
percentage of our international operational expenses are denominated in foreign currencies and exchange rate
volatility could positively or negatively impact those operating costs. For the fiscal years ended September 28, 2018,
September 29, 2017, and September 30, 2016, we had foreign exchange losses of $5.5 million, $3.1 million and
$5.6 million, respectively. Increases in the value of the United States dollar relative to other currencies could make
our products more expensive, which could negatively impact our ability to compete. Conversely, decreases in the value
of the United States dollar relative to other currencies could result in our suppliers raising their prices to continue
doing business with us. Given the relatively small number of customers and arrangements with third-party
manufacturers denominated in foreign currencies, we do not believe that foreign exchange volatility has a material
impact on our current business or results of operations. However, fluctuations in currency exchange rates could have a
greater effect on our business or results of operations in the future to the extent our expenses increasingly become
denominated in foreign currencies.
We may enter into foreign currency forward and option contracts with financial institutions to protect against
foreign exchange risks associated with certain existing assets and liabilities, certain firmly committed transactions,
forecasted future cash flows and net investments in foreign subsidiaries. However, we may choose not to hedge certain
foreign exchange exposures for a variety of reasons, including, but not limited to, accounting considerations and the
prohibitive economic cost of hedging particular exposures. For the fiscal year ended September 28, 2018, we had no
outstanding foreign currency forward or option contracts with financial institutions.
Page 88 Annual Report
88
Selected Financial Data
The information set forth below for the five years ended September 28, 2018, is not necessarily indicative of
results of future operations, and should be read in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations, and our consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere
in this Annual Report to fully understand factors that may affect the comparability of the information presented
below. Our fiscal year ends on the Friday closest to September 30. Fiscal 2018, 2017, 2016, and 2015 each consisted of
52 weeks and ended on September 28, 2018, September 29, 2017, September 30, 2016, and October 2, 2015,
respectively. Fiscal 2014 consisted of 53 weeks and ended on October 3, 2014.
The following table represents the selected financial data (in millions, except per share data):
Statement of Operations Data:
Net revenue
Operating income
Operating margin
Net income
Earnings per share:
Basic
Diluted
Cash dividends declared per
share
$
$
$
$
$
$
September 28,
2018(2)
September 29,
2017
September 30,
2016(1)
Fiscal Years Ended
3,868.0 $
1,319.3 $
34.1%
918.4 $
3,651.4 $
1,253.8 $
34.3%
1,010.2 $
3,289.0 $
1,118.7 $
34.0%
995.2 $
October 2,
2015
3,258.4 $
1,023.1 $
31.4%
798.3 $
October 3,
2014
2,291.5
565.2
24.7%
457.7
5.06 $
5.01 $
5.48 $
5.41 $
5.27 $
5.18 $
4.21 $
4.10 $
1.34 $
1.16 $
1.06 $
0.65 $
2.44
2.38
0.22
Balance Sheet Data:
Working capital
Property, plant and
equipment, net
Total assets
Stockholders’ equity
September 28,
2018(2)
September 29,
2017
September 30,
2016(1)
October 2,
2015
October 3,
2014
As of
$
$
$
$
1,872.5 $
2,245.8 $
1,791.9 $
1,450.8 $
1,131.6
1,140.9 $
4,828.9 $
4,097.0 $
882.3 $
4,573.6 $
4,065.7 $
806.3 $
3,855.4 $
3,541.4 $
826.4 $
3,719.4 $
3,159.2 $
555.9
2,973.8
2,532.4
(1) Fiscal 2016 net income and earnings per share include other income of $88.5 million related to the
receipt of the PMC-Sierra merger termination fee.
(2) Fiscal 2018 net income and earnings per share include a one-time charge of $224.6 million related to the
mandatory deemed repatriation tax on foreign earnings and a one-time charge of $18.3 million related to
the revaluation of deferred tax assets and liabilities at the new corporate tax rate, as a result of the Tax
Reform Act.
89
Annual Report Page 89
SKYWORKS SOLUTIONS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In millions, except per share amounts)
Net revenue
Cost of goods sold
Gross profit
Operating expenses:
Research and development
Selling, general and administrative
Amortization of intangibles
Restructuring and other charges
Total operating expenses
Operating income
Other income (expense), net
Merger termination fee
Income before income taxes
Provision for income taxes
Net income
Earnings per share:
Basic
Diluted
Weighted average shares:
Basic
Diluted
Cash dividends declared and paid per share
Fiscal Years Ended
September 28,
2018
3,868.0
1,917.3
$
September 29,
2017
3,651.4
1,809.6
$
September 30,
2016
3,289.0
1,623.8
$
1,950.7
1,841.8
1,665.2
404.5
207.8
18.3
0.8
631.4
1,319.3
12.8
—
1,332.1
413.7
355.2
204.6
27.6
0.6
588.0
1,253.8
3.2
—
1,257.0
246.8
312.4
195.9
33.4
4.8
546.5
1,118.7
(6.6)
88.5
1,200.6
205.4
$
$
$
$
918.4
$
1,010.2
$
995.2
5.06
5.01
$
$
5.48
5.41
$
$
181.3
183.2
184.3
186.7
1.34
$
1.16
$
5.27
5.18
188.7
192.1
1.06
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Page 90 Annual Report
90
SKYWORKS SOLUTIONS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In millions)
Net income
Other comprehensive income
Fair value of investments
Pension adjustments
Foreign currency translation adjustment
Comprehensive income
Fiscal Years Ended
September 28,
2018
$
918.4
September 29,
2017
1,010.2
$
September 30,
2016
$
995.2
(0.1)
—
(0.2)
0.9
0.7
0.8
$
918.1
$
1,012.6
$
—
(1.8)
(0.9)
992.5
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
91
Annual Report Page 91
SKYWORKS SOLUTIONS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In millions, except per share amounts)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
Marketable securities
Receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $0.6 and $0.5,
respectively
Inventory
Other current assets
Total current assets
Property, plant and equipment, net
Goodwill
Intangible assets, net
Deferred tax assets, net
Marketable securities
Other assets
Total assets
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable
Accrued compensation and benefits
Other current liabilities
Total current liabilities
Long-term tax liabilities
Other long-term liabilities
Total liabilities
Commitments and contingencies (Note 12 and Note 13)
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, no par value: 25.0 shares authorized, no shares issued
Common stock, $0.25 par value: 525.0 shares authorized; 228.4 shares issued
and 177.4 shares outstanding at September 28, 2018, and 226.0 shares
issued and 183.1 shares outstanding at September 29, 2017
Additional paid-in capital
Treasury stock, at cost
Retained earnings
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
Total stockholders’ equity
As of
September 28,
2018
September 29,
2017
$
$
$
$
733.3
294.1
655.8
490.2
88.8
2,262.2
1,140.9
1,189.8
143.7
36.5
22.8
33.0
4,828.9
$
$
229.9
85.2
74.6
389.7
310.5
31.7
731.9
1,616.8
—
454.7
493.5
68.7
2,633.7
882.3
883.0
67.8
66.5
—
40.3
4,573.6
258.4
68.1
61.4
387.9
92.9
27.1
507.9
—
—
44.4
3,061.0
(2,732.5)
3,732.9
(8.8)
4,097.0
45.8
2,893.8
(1,925.0)
3,059.6
(8.5)
4,065.7
4,573.6
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
$
4,828.9
$
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Page 92 Annual Report
92
SKYWORKS SOLUTIONS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In millions)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
$
918.4
$
1,010.2
$
995.2
Fiscal Years Ended
September 28,
2018
September 29,
2017
September 30,
2016
Share-based compensation
Depreciation
Amortization of intangible assets
Deferred income taxes
Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation
Changes in fair value of contingent consideration
Other
Changes in assets and liabilities net of acquired balances:
Receivables, net
Inventory
Other current and long-term assets
Accounts payable
Other current and long-term liabilities
Net cash provided by operating activities
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures
Payments for acquisitions, net of cash acquired
Purchased intangibles
Purchases of marketable securities
Sales and maturities of investments
107.8
272.5
26.7
27.3
—
(11.9)
(0.7)
(193.8)
11.9
(12.2)
(126.0)
240.6
1,260.6
(422.3)
(404.0)
(8.6)
(683.7)
368.2
Net cash used in investing activities
(1,150.4)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Payments for obligations recorded for business combinations
Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation
Repurchase of common stock—payroll tax withholdings on equity awards
Repurchase of common stock—share repurchase program
Dividends paid
Net proceeds from exercise of stock options
Proceeds from employee stock purchase plan
Deferred payments for intangible assets
Payments of contingent consideration
Net cash used in financing activities
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
Supplemental cash flow disclosures:
Income taxes paid
—
—
(48.0)
(759.5)
(243.2)
38.8
18.2
—
—
(993.7)
(883.5)
1,616.8
88.5
227.2
27.6
2.2
(40.8)
(1.3)
0.3
(37.1)
(69.2)
3.3
147.8
97.6
1,456.3
(303.3)
(13.7)
(12.1)
—
3.2
(325.9)
—
40.8
(49.2)
(432.3)
(214.6)
53.8
15.0
(5.5)
(5.4)
(597.4)
533.0
1,083.8
78.0
214.4
33.4
—
(43.7)
—
0.3
121.4
(147.3)
(20.4)
(181.5)
27.9
1,077.7
(189.3)
(55.6)
(6.0)
—
—
(250.9)
(76.5)
43.7
(73.3)
(525.6)
(201.0)
28.1
18.0
—
—
(786.6)
40.2
1,043.6
$
$
733.3
$
1,616.8
$
1,083.8
135.9
$
163.2
$
165.9
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
93
Annual Report Page 93
SKYWORKS SOLUTIONS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(In millions)
Shares of
common
stock
Par value
of
common
stock
190.3 $
—
47.6
—
Shares of
treasury
stock
Value of
treasury
stock
Additional
paid-in
capital
Accumulated
other
Total
Retained
earnings
comprehensive stockholders’
loss
equity
28.7 $ (844.6) $
2,495.2 $
1,469.2 $
(8.2) $
3,159.2
—
—
—
995.2
—
995.2
Balance at October 2, 2015
Net income
Exercise and settlement of share
based awards and related tax
benefit, net of shares withheld for
taxes
Share-based compensation expense
2.6
—
0.6
—
Share repurchase program
(8.0)
(2.0)
Dividends declared
Other comprehensive loss
Balance at September 30, 2016
Net income
Exercise and settlement of share
based awards and related tax
benefit, net of shares withheld for
taxes
Share-based compensation expense
—
—
184.9 $
—
2.9
—
—
—
46.2
—
0.7
—
Share repurchase program
(4.7)
(1.1)
Dividends declared
Other comprehensive income
—
—
Balance at September 29, 2017
183.1 $
Net income
Exercise and settlement of share
based awards, net of shares
withheld for taxes
Share-based compensation expense
—
2.0
—
—
—
45.8
—
0.5
—
Share repurchase program
(7.7)
(1.9)
Dividends declared
Pre-combination service on
replacement awards
Other comprehensive loss
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.9
—
8.0
—
—
(73.3)
—
(525.6)
—
—
109.1
79.7
2.0
—
—
—
—
—
(200.8)
—
—
—
—
—
(2.7)
36.4
79.7
(525.6)
(200.8)
(2.7)
37.6 $ (1,443.5) $
2,686.0 $
2,263.6 $
(10.9) $
3,541.4
—
—
—
1,010.2
—
1,010.2
0.6
—
4.7
—
—
(49.2)
—
(432.3)
—
—
118.2
88.5
1.1
—
—
—
—
—
(214.2)
—
—
—
—
—
2.4
69.7
88.5
(432.3)
(214.2)
2.4
42.9 $ (1,925.0) $
2,893.8 $
3,059.6 $
(8.5) $
4,065.7
—
0.4
—
7.7
—
—
—
—
—
918.4
(48.0)
—
(759.5)
—
—
—
57.8
107.3
1.9
—
0.2
—
—
(1.9)
—
(243.2)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(0.3)
918.4
10.3
105.4
(759.5)
(243.2)
0.2
(0.3)
Balance at September 28, 2018
177.4 $
44.4
51.0 $ (2,732.5) $
3,061.0 $
3,732.9 $
(8.8) $
4,097.0
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Page 94 Annual Report
94
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Skyworks Solutions, Inc., together with its consolidated subsidiaries (‘‘Skyworks’’ or the ‘‘Company’’), is
empowering the wireless networking revolution. The Company’s analog semiconductors are connecting people,
places, and things, spanning a number of new applications within the aerospace, automotive, broadband, cellular
infrastructure, connected home, industrial, medical, military, smartphone, tablet and wearable markets.
2.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION
All Skyworks subsidiaries are included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements and all intercompany
balances are eliminated in consolidation.
FISCAL YEAR
The Company’s fiscal year ends on the Friday closest to September 30. Fiscal 2018, 2017, and 2016 each consisted
of 52 weeks and ended on September 28, 2018, September 29, 2017, and September 30, 2016, respectively.
USE OF ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, expenses, comprehensive income and accumulated
other comprehensive loss during the reporting period. The Company evaluates its estimates on an ongoing basis using
historical experience and other factors, including the current economic environment. Significant judgment is required
in determining the reserves for and fair value of items such as overall fair value assessments of assets and liabilities,
inventory, intangible assets associated with business combinations, share-based compensation, loss contingencies, and
income taxes. In addition, significant judgment is required in determining whether a potential indicator of impairment
of long-lived assets exists and in estimating future cash flows for any necessary impairment testing. Actual results
could differ significantly from these estimates.
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
The Company invests excess cash in time deposits, certificate of deposits, money market funds, U.S. Treasury
securities, agency securities, other government securities, corporate debt securities and commercial paper. The
Company considers highly liquid investments with maturities of 90 days or less when purchased as cash equivalents.
ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS
The Company maintains general allowances for doubtful accounts related to potential losses that could arise due
to customers’ inability to make required payments. These reserves require management to apply judgment in deriving
these estimates. In addition, the Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition
and if it becomes aware of any specific receivables which may be uncollectable, it performs additional analysis
including, but not limited to, factors such as a customer’s credit worthiness, intent and ability to pay and overall
financial position, and reserves are recorded if deemed necessary. If the data the Company uses to calculate the
allowance for doubtful accounts does not reflect the future ability to collect outstanding receivables, additional
provisions for doubtful accounts may be needed and results of operations could be materially affected.
INVESTMENTS
The Company classifies its investment in marketable securities as ‘‘available-for-sale.’’ Available-for-sale
securities are carried at fair value with unrealized holding gains or losses recorded in other comprehensive income.
Gains or losses are included in earnings in the period in which they are realized.
95
Annual Report Page 95
FAIR VALUE
Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an
exit price) in the principle or most advantageous market in an orderly transaction between market participants at the
measurement date. Applicable accounting guidance provides a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that
prioritize the use of observable inputs over the use of unobservable inputs, when such observable inputs are available.
The three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value are as follows:
• Level 1—Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
• Level 2—Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities,
quoted prices in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions (less active markets), or model-
driven valuations in which all significant inputs are observable or can be derived principally from, or
corroborated with, observable market data.
• Level 3—Fair value is derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs are
unobservable, including assumptions and judgments made by the Company.
It is the Company’s policy to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs
when developing fair value measurements. When available, the Company uses quoted market prices to measure fair
value. If market prices are not available, the Company is required to make judgments about assumptions market
participants would use to estimate the fair value of a financial instrument.
The Company measures certain assets and liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis in three levels, based on the
market in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value.
It recognizes transfers within the fair value hierarchy at the end of the fiscal quarter in which the change in
circumstances that caused the transfer occurred.
The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, other current assets, accounts payable and
accrued liabilities approximates fair value due to the short-term maturities of these assets and liabilities.
INVENTORY
Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value on a first-in, first-out basis. Reserves for excess and
obsolete inventory are established on a quarterly basis and are based on a detailed analysis of aged material,
forecasted demand in relation to on-hand inventory, salability of our inventory, general market conditions, and
product life cycles. Once reserves are established, write-downs of inventory are considered permanent adjustments to
the cost basis of inventory.
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Property, plant and equipment are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation, with significant renewals and
betterments being capitalized and retired equipment written off in the respective periods. Maintenance and repairs
are expensed as incurred.
Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives, which range from five to
thirty years for buildings and improvements and three to ten years for machinery and equipment. Leasehold
improvements are depreciated over the lesser of the economic life or the life of the associated lease.
VALUATION OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
Definite lived intangible assets are carried at cost less accumulated amortization. Amortization is calculated
based on the pattern of benefit to be recognized from the underlying asset over its estimated useful life. Carrying
values for long-lived assets and definite lived intangible assets are reviewed for possible impairment as circumstances
warrant. Factors considered important that could result in an impairment review include significant underperformance
relative to expected, historical or projected future operating results, significant changes in the manner of use of assets
or the Company’s business strategy, or significant negative industry or economic trends. In addition, impairment
reviews are conducted at the judgment of management whenever asset values are deemed to be unrecoverable relative
Page 96 Annual Report
96
to future undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by that particular asset group. The determination of
recoverability is based on an estimate of undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of an asset group and
its eventual disposition. Such estimates require management to exercise judgment and make assumptions regarding
factors such as future revenue streams, operating expenditures, cost allocation and asset utilization levels, all of which
collectively impact future operating performance. The Company’s estimates of undiscounted cash flows may differ
from actual cash flows due to, among other things, technological changes, economic conditions, changes to its business
model or changes in its operating performance. If the sum of the undiscounted cash flows is less than the carrying
value of an asset group, the Company would recognize an impairment loss, measured as the amount by which the
carrying value exceeds the fair value of the asset group.
GOODWILL AND INDEFINITE-LIVED INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized but are tested at least annually as of the first day
of the fourth fiscal quarter for impairment or more frequently if indicators of impairment exist during the fiscal year.
The Company assesses its conclusion regarding segments and reporting units in conjunction with its annual goodwill
impairment test, and has determined that it has one reporting unit for the purposes of allocating and testing goodwill.
The Company’s impairment analysis compares its fair value to its net book value to determine if there is an
indicator of impairment. In the Company’s calculation of fair value, it considers the closing price of its common stock
on the selected testing date, the number of shares of its common stock outstanding and other marketplace activity
such as a related control premium. If the calculated fair value is determined to be less than the book value of the
reporting unit, an impairment loss is recognized equal to that excess; however, the loss recognized should not exceed
the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit.
BUSINESS COMBINATIONS
The Company uses the acquisition method of accounting for business combinations and recognizes assets
acquired and liabilities assumed at their fair values on the date acquired. Goodwill represents the excess of the
purchase price over the fair value of the net assets. The fair values of the assets and liabilities acquired are determined
based upon the Company’s valuation using a combination of market, income or cost approaches. The valuation
involves making significant estimates and assumptions, which are based on detailed financial models including the
projection of future cash flows, the weighted average cost of capital and any cost savings that are expected to be
derived in the future from the viewpoint of a market participant.
EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS
The funded status of benefit pension plans, or the balance of plan assets and benefit obligations, is recognized on
the consolidated balance sheet and pension liability adjustments, net of tax, are recorded in Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income. The Company determines discount rates considering the rates of return on high-quality fixed
income investments, and the expected long-term rate of return on pension plan assets by considering the current and
expected asset allocations, as well as historical and expected returns on various categories of plan assets. Decreases in
discount rates lead to increases in benefit obligations that, in turn, could lead to an increase in amortization cost
through amortization of actuarial gain or loss. A decline in the market values of plan assets will generally result in a
lower expected rate of return, which would result in an increase of future retirement benefit costs.
REVENUE RECOGNITION
Revenue from product sales is recognized when there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the price to the
buyer is fixed and determinable, delivery and transfer of title have occurred in accordance with the shipping terms
specified in the arrangement with the customer and collectability is reasonably assured. Revenue from license fees and
intellectual property is recognized when due and payable, and all other criteria previously noted have been met. The
Company ships product on consignment to certain customers and only recognizes revenue when the customer notifies
the Company that the inventory has been consumed. Revenue recognition is deferred in all instances where the
earnings process is incomplete. Certain product sales are made to electronic component distributors under
agreements allowing for price protection and stock rotation on unsold products. Reserves for sales returns and
allowances are recorded based on historical experience or pursuant to contractual arrangements necessitating revenue
97
Annual Report Page 97
reserves. Reserves for sales returns and allowances of $32.2 million and $14.7 million were recorded as of
September 28, 2018 and September 29, 2017, respectively.
SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
The Company recognizes compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees and
directors including non-qualified employee stock options, share awards and units, employee stock purchase plan and
other special share-based awards based on estimated fair values.
The fair value of share-based payment awards is amortized over the requisite service period, which is defined as
the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for an award. The Company uses a
straight-line attribution method for all grants that include only a service condition. Awards with both performance and
service conditions are expensed over the service period for each separately vesting tranche.
Share-based compensation expense recognized during the period includes actual expense on vested awards and
expense associated with unvested awards. Forfeitures are recorded as incurred.
The Company determines the fair value of share-based option awards based on the Company’s closing stock price
on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes options pricing model. Under the Black-Scholes model, a number of
variables are used including, but not limited to: the expected stock price volatility over the term of the award, the
risk-free rate, the expected life of the award and dividend yield. The determination of fair value of restricted and
certain performance share awards and units is based on the value of the Company’s stock on the date of grant with
performance awards and units adjusted for the actual outcome of the underlying performance condition.
For more complex performance awards including units with market-based performance conditions the Company
employs a Monte Carlo simulation valuation method to calculate the fair value of the awards based on the most likely
outcome. Under the Monte Carlo simulation, a number of highly complex and subjective variables are used including,
but not limited to: the expected stock price volatility over the term of the award, a correlation coefficient, the risk-free
rate, the expected life of the award, and dividend yield.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT COSTS
Research and development costs are expensed as incurred.
LOSS CONTINGENCIES
The Company records its best estimates of a loss contingency when it is considered probable and the amount can
be reasonably estimated. When a range of loss can be reasonably estimated with no best estimate in the range, the
minimum estimated liability related to the claim is recorded. As additional information becomes available, the
Company assesses the potential liability related to the potential pending loss contingency and revises its estimates.
Loss contingencies are disclosed if there is at least a reasonable possibility that a loss or an additional loss may have
been incurred and include estimated legal costs.
RESTRUCTURING
A liability for post-employment benefits is recorded when payment is probable, the amount is reasonably
estimable, and the obligation relates to rights that have vested or accumulated. Contract exit costs include contract
termination fees and future contractual commitments for lease payments. A liability for contract exit costs is
recognized in the period in which the Company terminates the contract or on the cease-use date for leased facilities.
FOREIGN CURRENCIES
The Company’s primary functional currency is the United States dollar. Gains and losses related to foreign
currency transactions, conversion of foreign denominated cash balances and translation of foreign currency financial
statements are included in current results. For certain foreign entities that utilize local currencies as their functional
currency, the resulting unrealized translation gains and losses are reported as currency translation adjustment through
other comprehensive income (loss) for each period.
Page 98 Annual Report
98
INCOME TAXES
The Company uses the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under the asset and liability
method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to
differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax
basis. This method also requires the recognition of future tax benefits such as net operating loss carry forwards, to the
extent that realization of such benefits is more likely than not. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using
enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected
to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in
income in the period that includes the enactment date.
The carrying value of the Company’s net deferred tax assets assumes the Company will be able to generate
sufficient future taxable income in certain tax jurisdictions, based on estimates and assumptions. If these estimates and
related assumptions change in the future, the Company may be required to record additional valuation allowances
against its deferred tax assets resulting in additional income tax expense in its Consolidated Statement of Operations.
Management evaluates the realizability of the deferred tax assets and assesses the adequacy of the valuation allowance
quarterly. Likewise, in the event the Company were to determine that it would be able to realize its deferred tax assets
in the future in excess of their net recorded amount, an adjustment to the deferred tax assets would increase income
or decrease the carrying value of goodwill in the period such determination was made.
The determination of recording or releasing tax valuation allowances is made, in part, pursuant to an assessment
performed by management regarding the likelihood that the Company will generate future taxable income against
which benefits of its deferred tax assets may or may not be realized. This assessment requires management to exercise
significant judgment and make estimates with respect to its ability to generate revenues, gross profits, operating
income and taxable income in future periods. Amongst other factors, management must make assumptions regarding
overall business and semiconductor industry conditions, operating efficiencies, the Company’s ability to develop
products to its customers’ specifications, technological change, the competitive environment and changes in regulatory
requirements which may impact its ability to generate taxable income and, in turn, realize the value of its deferred tax
assets.
The calculation of the Company’s tax liabilities includes addressing uncertainties in the application of complex
tax regulations and is based on the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or
expected to be taken in a tax return.
The Company recognizes liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues in the United States and other tax jurisdictions
based on its recognition threshold and measurement attribute of whether it is more likely than not that the positions
the Company has taken in tax filings will be sustained upon tax audit, and the extent to which, additional taxes would
be due. If payment of these amounts ultimately proves to be unnecessary, the reversal of the liabilities would result in
tax benefits being recognized in the period in which it is determined the liabilities are no longer necessary. If the
estimate of tax liabilities proves to be less than the ultimate assessment, a further charge to expense would result. The
Company recognizes any interest or penalties, if incurred, on any unrecognized tax liabilities or benefits as a
component of income tax expense.
EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic earnings per share are computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during
the period. Diluted earnings per share incorporate the potentially dilutive incremental shares issuable upon the
assumed exercise of stock options, the assumed vesting of outstanding restricted stock units, and the assumed issuance
of common stock under the stock purchase plan using the treasury share method.
RECENTLY ADOPTED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In March 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (‘‘FASB’’) issued Accounting Standards Update
(‘‘ASU’’) 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (‘‘ASU 2016-09’’), which is intended
to simplify several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax
consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows.
99
Annual Report Page 99
The Company adopted ASU 2016-09 at the beginning of the first quarter of fiscal 2018. As a result of adoption, the
Company recognized a discrete income tax benefit of $25.6 million to the income tax provision for excess tax benefits
generated by the settlement of share-based awards during fiscal 2018. The adoption also resulted in an increase in
cash flow from operations and a decrease of cash flow from financing of $25.6 million during fiscal 2018. Prior periods
have not been adjusted. The Company has elected to account for forfeitures as they occur and will no longer estimate
future forfeitures. The change in accounting for forfeitures was applied using a modified retrospective transition
method and resulted in a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first quarter of
fiscal 2018 in the amount of $1.9 million. Forfeitures in the future will now be recorded as a benefit in the period they
are realized.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the
Test for Goodwill Impairment (‘‘ASU 2017-04’’). This ASU simplifies the subsequent measurement of goodwill and
eliminates Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. The annual or interim goodwill impairment test is performed by
comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, and an impairment charge should be recognized
for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value; however, the loss recognized
should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. In addition, income tax effects from
any tax deductible goodwill on the carrying amount of the reporting unit should be considered when measuring the
goodwill impairment loss, if applicable. The Company early adopted ASU 2017-04 during the second quarter of fiscal
2018 and applied it prospectively, as permitted by the standard. The adoption of this standard did not impact the
Company’s consolidated financial statements.
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In August 2015, the FASB deferred the effective date of ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers
(Topic 606) (‘‘ASU 2014-09’’), which outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for
revenue arising from contracts with customers and will supersede most current revenue recognition guidance. The
new guidance is required to be applied retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented or retrospectively with
the cumulative effect of initially applying it recognized at the date of initial application. The Company will adopt this
guidance during the first quarter of fiscal 2019 and will apply the modified retrospective approach, with the cumulative
effect of applying the new guidance recognized as an adjustment to the opening retained earnings balance. The
Company has established a cross-functional team to assess the potential impact of the new revenue standard. The
assessment process consists of reviewing the Company’s current accounting policies and practices to identify potential
differences that would result from applying the requirements of the new standard to its revenue contracts and
identifying appropriate changes to the business processes, systems and controls to support revenue recognition and
disclosure requirements under the new standard. The Company has determined the impact of the new revenue
standard on its business processes, systems, controls and consolidated financial statements is not material.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (‘‘ASU 2016-02’’). This ASU requires lessees
to reflect most leases on their balance sheet as assets and obligations. The effective date for the standard is for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The standard is to be applied under the
modified retrospective method, with elective reliefs, which requires application of the new guidance for all periods
presented. The Company is currently evaluating the effect that ASU 2016-02 will have on the consolidated financial
statements and related disclosures.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230), (‘‘ASU 2016-15’’). This
ASU provides guidance on the presentation and classification of specific cash flow items to improve consistency within
the statement of cash flows. The effective date for the standard is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017,
with early adoption permitted. The Company will early adopt ASU 2016-15 during the first quarter of fiscal 2019 and
does not expect it to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740), Intra-entity Transfers of an Asset
Other than Inventory (‘‘ASU 2016-16’’). This ASU provides guidance that changes the accounting for income tax
effects of intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory. Under the new guidance, the selling (transferring) entity
is required to recognize a current tax expense or benefit upon transfer of the asset. Similarly, the purchasing
(receiving) entity is required to recognize a deferred tax asset or deferred tax liability, as well as the related deferred
Page 100 Annual Report
100
tax benefit or expense, upon receipt of the asset. The effective date for the standard is for fiscal years beginning after
December, 15, 2017, on a modified retrospective basis, and early adoption is permitted. The Company will early adopt
ASU 2016-16 during the first quarter of fiscal 2019 and does not expect it to have a material impact on the
consolidated financial statements.
In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718), Scope of
Modification Accounting (‘‘ASU 2017-09’’). This ASU provides guidance about which changes to the terms or
conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting in Topic 718. The
effective date for the standard is for interim periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, with early
adoption permitted, including adoption in any interim period for which financial statements have not yet been issued.
The Company will early adopt ASU 2017-09 during the first quarter of fiscal 2019 and does not expect it to have a
material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments
(Topic 320), (‘‘ASU 2016-13’’). This ASU requires a financial asset (or a group of financial assets) measured on the
basis of amortized cost to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected. This ASU requires that the income
statement reflect the measurement of credit losses for newly recognized financial assets as well as the expected
increases or decreases of expected credit losses that have taken place during the period. This ASU requires that credit
losses of debt securities designated as available-for-sale be recorded through an allowance for credit losses. The ASU
also limits the credit loss to the amount by which fair value is below amortized cost. This ASU will be effective for the
Company in the first quarter of 2021, with early adoption permitted. This ASU requires modified retrospective
adoption, with prospective adoption for debt securities for which an other-than-temporary impairment had been
recognized before the effective date. The Company is currently evaluating the effect ASU 2016-13 will have on the
consolidated financial statements.
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities (Topic 320), (‘‘ASU 2016-01’’). This ASU provides guidance for the recognition, measurement,
presentation, and disclosure of financial assets and liabilities. This ASU will be effective for the Company in the first
quarter of fiscal 2019 and requires modified retrospective adoption, with prospective adoption for amendments
related to equity securities without readily determinable fair values. The Company is evaluating the effect ASU
2016-01 will have on the consolidated financial statements.
In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-07, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718), Improvements to
Nonemployee Share-based Payments (‘‘ASU 2018-07’’). This ASU expands the scope of Topic 718 to include share-
based payment transactions for acquiring goods and services from nonemployees. The effective date for the standard
is for interim periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted, but no earlier
than the Company’s adoption date of Topic 606. The new guidance is required to be applied retrospectively with the
cumulative effect recognized at the date of initial application. The Company will early adopt ASU 2018-07 during the
first quarter of fiscal 2019 and does not expect it to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement—Disclosure Framework (Topic 820),
(‘‘ASU 2018-13’’). The updated guidance improves the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements. The
updated guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after
December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for any removed or modified disclosures. The Company early
adopted the removed or modified disclosures in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018 and is currently assessing the timing
and impact of adopting the updated provisions.
There have been no other recent accounting pronouncements or changes in accounting pronouncements that are
of significance, or potential significance, to the Company.
Supplemental Cash Flow Information
As of September 28, 2018, the Company had $13.9 million accrued to other long-term liabilities for capital
equipment, and $94.1 million accrued to accounts payable for capital equipment. These amounts accrued for capital
equipment purchases have been excluded from the consolidated statements of cash flows for fiscal 2018 and are
expected to be paid in subsequent periods. The prior period amount under the description ‘‘Proceeds from employee
101
Annual Report Page 101
stock purchase plan’’ has been reclassified from net cash provided by operating activities to net cash used in financing
activities.
3. BUSINESS COMBINATIONS
On August 17, 2018, the Company completed its acquisition of Avnera Corporation (‘‘Avnera’’). Avnera designs
and develops analog system-on-chip (‘‘SoC’’) technology products for audio, speech, sensor and artificial intelligence
(‘‘AI’’) applications. The Company acquired Avnera to expand its leadership in wireless connectivity by adding
ultra-low power analog circuits to enable smart interfaces via acoustic signal processing, sensors and integrated
software. The acquisition of Avnera is expected to enable the Company to capitalize on the rapid proliferation of
audio functionality and its convergence with its advanced connectivity solutions.
The Company acquired the business for total cash consideration, net of cash acquired, of $404.0 million together
with future contingent payments for a total aggregated fair value of $407.1 million. The future contingent
consideration payments range from zero to $20.0 million and are based upon the achievement of specified revenue
objectives that are payable up to one fiscal year from the anniversary of the acquisition, which at closing had a total
estimated fair value of $3.1 million.
Net revenue and net income from this acquisition has been included in the Consolidated Statements of
Operations from the acquisition date through the end of the fiscal year on September 28, 2018, and the impact of the
acquisition to the ongoing operations on the Company’s net revenue and net income was not material. The Company
incurred immaterial transaction-related costs during the fiscal year ended September 28, 2018, which were included
within the selling, administrative and general expense.
The allocation of the purchase price to the assets and liabilities recognized in the Company’s acquisition of
Avnera was considered final at the time of filing this Annual Report. The allocation of the purchase price is based on
the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed by major class related to the Avnera acquisition
and are reflected, as of the acquisition date, in the accompanying financial statements as follows (in millions):
Estimated fair value of assets acquired, net of cash
Accounts receivable
Inventory, including step up
Property, plant and equipment
Other assets
Intangible assets
Goodwill
Liabilities assumed
Estimated fair value of net assets acquired
As of
August 17,
2018
7.3
9.8
1.5
11.7
94.0
306.8
(24.0)
407.1
$
$
Goodwill is primarily attributable to the assembled workforce and Company specific revenue synergies expected
from the integration of the Avnera business. This goodwill will not be deductible for tax purposes.
Intangible Assets
Developed technology
Customer relationships and backlog
Tradename
Total identified finite-lived intangible assets
In process research and development
Total identified intangible assets
As of
August 17,
2018
37.3
10.4
0.3
48.0
46.0
94.0
$
$
Developed technology relates to SoC-based wireless audio solutions and sound processors. Developed technology
was valued using the multi-period excess earnings method under the income approach. This method reflects the
present value of the projected cash flows that are expected to be generated by the developed technology less charges
Page 102 Annual Report
102
representing the contribution of other assets to those cash flows. The economic useful life of two years was
determined based on the technology cycle related to each developed technology, as well as the cash flows over the
forecast period.
Customer relationships and backlog represent the fair value of future projected revenue that will be derived from
sales of products to existing customers of Avnera. Customer relationships and backlog were valued using the
with-and-without method under the income approach. In the with-and-without method, the fair value was measured
by the difference between the present values of the cash flows with and without the existing customers in place over
the period of time necessary to reacquire the customers. The economic useful life of one year was determined based
on historical customer acquisition rates.
Tradename relates to the ‘‘Avnera’’ trade name. The fair value was determined by applying the relief-from-royalty
method under the income approach. This method is based on the application of a market royalty rate to forecasted
revenue under the trade name.
The fair value of in-process research and development, or IPR&D, was determined using the multi-period excess
earnings method under the income approach. This method reflects the present value of the projected cash flows that
are expected to be generated by the IPR&D, less charges representing the contribution of other assets to those cash
flows.
The unaudited pro forma financial results for the fiscal years ended September 28, 2018, and September 29, 2017,
combine the unaudited historical results of Skyworks with the unaudited historical results of Avnera for the fiscal
years ended September 28, 2018, and September 29, 2017, respectively. The results include the effects of unaudited
pro forma adjustments as if Avnera was acquired at the beginning of the prior fiscal year. The unaudited pro forma
results presented include amortization charges for acquired intangible assets, adjustments for increases in the fair
value of acquired inventory, other charges and related tax effects. The pro forma financial results presented below do
not include any anticipated synergies or other expected benefits of the acquisition. These unaudited results are
presented for informational purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of future operations (in millions, except
per share amounts):
Revenue
Net income
Diluted earnings per common share
4. MARKETABLE SECURITIES
Fiscal Years-Ended
September 28,
2018
September 29,
2017
$
$
3,914.3
926.0
5.05
$
$
3,693.9
977.8
5.24
The Company’s portfolio of available-for-sale marketable securities consists of the following (in millions):
Available for sale:
U.S. Treasury and government
Corporate bonds and notes
Municipal bonds
Other government
Total
Current
Noncurrent
September 28,
2018
September 29,
2017
September 28,
2018
September 29,
2017
$
$
65.0
$
— $
— $
204.1
2.0
23.0
—
—
—
12.0
0.8
10.0
294.1
$
— $
22.8
$
—
—
—
—
—
The contractual maturities of noncurrent available-for-sale marketable securities were due within two years or
less.
103
Annual Report Page 103
The Company recorded unrealized gains and losses on sales of available-for-sale marketable securities as follows
(in millions):
September 28, 2018
U.S. Treasury and government
Corporate bonds and notes
Municipal bonds
Other government
Total
Amortized
Cost
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Estimated
Fair Value
$
$
65.0
$
— $
— $
216.1
2.8
33.1
—
—
—
(0.1)
—
—
317.0
$
— $
(0.1)
$
65.0
216.0
2.8
33.1
316.9
The Company concluded that the unrealized losses were temporary at September 28, 2018. Further, for bonds
and other debt securities held by the Company with unrealized losses, the Company did not have the intent to sell, nor
was it more likely than not that the Company would be required to sell, such securities before recovery or maturity.
5.
FAIR VALUE
Assets and Liabilities Measured and Recorded at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The Company measures certain assets and liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis such as its financial
instruments. There have been no transfers between Level 1, 2 or 3 assets or liabilities during the fiscal year ended
September 28, 2018.
Contingent consideration related to business combinations is recorded as a Level 3 liability because management
uses significant judgments and unobservable inputs to determine the fair value. The Company reassesses the fair value
of its contingent consideration liabilities on a quarterly basis and records any fair value adjustments to earnings in the
period that they are determined. The decrease in Level 3 liabilities during fiscal 2018, relates to net adjustments to the
fair value of contingent consideration liabilities, which were included in selling, general and administrative expenses,
partially offset by the fair value of the contingent consideration associated with a business combination completed
during the period, as detailed in Note 3 of these Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The fair value of the
contingent consideration was determined using a probabilistic Black-Scholes pricing model calibrated to the expected
revenue forecast to be generated from the acquired business over a one-year period.
Assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis consisted of the following (in millions):
As of September 28, 2018
As of September 29, 2017
Fair Value Measurements
Fair Value Measurements
Total
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Assets
Cash equivalents*
U.S. Treasury and government securities
Corporate bonds and notes
Municipal bonds
Other government securities
Total
Liabilities
Contingent consideration
Total
$
$
$
$
79.3 $
65.0
216.0
2.8
33.1
29.7 $
15.0
—
—
—
49.6 $
50.0
216.0
2.8
33.1
396.2 $
44.7 $
351.5 $
— $
—
—
—
—
— $
592.6 $
—
—
—
—
592.6 $
—
—
—
—
592.6 $
592.6 $
3.1 $
3.1 $
— $
— $
— $
— $
3.1 $
3.1 $
11.9 $
11.9 $
— $
— $
— $
—
—
—
—
— $
— $
— $
—
—
—
—
—
—
11.9
11.9
*
Cash equivalents included in Levels 1 and 2 consist of money market funds and corporate bonds and notes,
foreign government bonds, commercial paper, and agency securities purchased with less than ninety days until
maturity.
Page 104 Annual Report
104
The following table summarizes changes to the fair value of the Level 3 liabilities (in millions):
Balance as of September 29, 2017
Increases to Level 3 liabilities
Changes in fair value included in earnings
Balance as of September 28, 2018
Contingent
Consideration
$
$
11.9
3.1
(11.9)
3.1
Assets Measured and Recorded at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
The Company’s non-financial assets and liabilities, such as goodwill, intangible assets, and other long-lived assets
resulting from business combinations, are measured at fair value using income approach valuation methodologies at
the date of acquisition and are subsequently re-measured if there are indicators of impairment.
6.
INVENTORY
Inventory consists of the following (in millions):
Raw materials
Work-in-process
Finished goods
Finished goods held on consignment by customers
Total inventory
7.
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET
Property, plant and equipment, net consists of the following (in millions):
Land and improvements
Buildings and improvements
Furniture and fixtures
Machinery and equipment
Construction in progress
Total property, plant and equipment, gross
Accumulated depreciation
Total property, plant and equipment, net
As of
September 28,
2018
September 29,
2017
$
20.2
340.7
124.8
4.5
490.2
$
24.6
330.6
123.0
15.3
493.5
As of
September 28,
2018
September 29,
2017
$
$
$
$
11.6
238.0
31.5
2,089.6
179.0
2,549.7
(1,408.8)
$
1,140.9
$
11.6
137.8
29.5
1,715.3
164.8
2,059.0
(1,176.7)
882.3
8. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The changes to the carrying amount of goodwill are as follows (in millions):
Goodwill at beginning of the period
Goodwill recognized through business combinations (Note 3)
Goodwill impairment
Goodwill at the end of the period
As of
September 28,
2018
September 29,
2017
$
$
$
883.0
306.8
—
1,189.8
$
873.3
9.7
—
883.0
105
Annual Report Page 105
The Company performed an impairment test of its goodwill as of the first day of the fourth fiscal quarter in
accordance with its regularly scheduled testing. The results of this test indicated that the Company’s goodwill was not
impaired. There were no other indicators of impairment noted during the fiscal year ended September 28, 2018.
Intangible assets consist of the following (in millions):
As of
September 28, 2018
As of
September 29, 2017
Weighted
average
amortization
period (years)
Gross
carrying
amount
Accumulated
amortization
Net
carrying
amount
Gross
carrying
amount
Accumulated
amortization
Net
carrying
amount
Customer relationships
Developed technology and other
Trademarks
Capitalized software
IPR&D
$
3.4
5.3
3.0
3.0
$
31.7
89.9
1.6
18.0
46.0
$
(13.2)
(23.5)
(0.8)
(6.0)
—
18.5
66.4
0.8
12.0
46.0
Total intangible assets
$
187.2
$
(43.5)
$
143.7
$
$
$
$
29.7
59.9
1.6
12.1
—
$
(14.6)
(20.6)
(0.3)
—
—
103.3
$
(35.5)
$
15.1
39.3
1.3
12.1
—
67.8
Fully amortized intangible assets have been eliminated from both the gross and accumulated amortization
amounts. The increase in the gross amount of intangible assets is primarily related to the business combination that
closed during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018. For further information regarding the acquired intangibles see Note 3,
Business Combinations, in these Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Annual amortization expense for the next five fiscal years related to intangible assets is expected to be as follows
(in millions):
Amortization expense, cost of goods sold
Amortization expense, operating expense
Total amortization expense
$
$
24.8
22.6
47.4
$
$
22.5
11.8
34.3
$
$
0.1
9.0
9.1
$
$
0.1
1.0
1.1
$
$
0.1
1.0
1.1
$
$
1.9
2.8
4.7
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Thereafter
9.
INCOME TAXES
Income before income taxes consists of the following components (in millions):
Fiscal Years Ended
September 28,
2018
September 29,
2017
September 30,
2016
United States
Foreign
Income before income taxes
$
$
712.2
619.9
1,332.1
$
$
681.2
575.8
1,257.0
The provision for income taxes consists of the following (in millions):
Current tax expense (benefit):
Federal
State
Foreign
Deferred tax expense (benefit):
Federal
Foreign
Fiscal Years Ended
September 28,
2018
September 29,
2017
$
$
347.7
0.3
31.2
379.2
20.3
14.2
34.5
215.7
0.3
24.4
240.4
5.0
1.4
6.4
$
$
$
Provision for income taxes
$
413.7
$
246.8
$
Page 106 Annual Report
106
697.5
503.1
1,200.6
September 30,
2016
181.8
0.1
25.8
207.7
(0.8)
(1.5)
(2.3)
205.4
The actual income tax expense is different than that which would have been computed by applying the federal
statutory tax rate to income before income taxes. A reconciliation of income tax expense as computed at the United
States federal statutory income tax rate to the provision for income tax expense is as follows (in millions):
Tax expense at United States statutory rate
Foreign tax rate difference
Tax on deemed repatriation
Effect of stock compensation
Change of tax rate on deferred taxes
Research and development credits
Change in tax reserve
Domestic production activities deduction
Other, net
Provision for income taxes
Fiscal Years Ended
September 28,
2018
September 29,
2017
September 30,
2016
$
$
327.4
(111.9)
224.6
(25.6)
18.3
(19.9)
6.7
(13.9)
8.0
$
439.9
(174.6)
—
—
—
(16.3)
12.6
(19.8)
5.0
$
413.7
$
246.8
$
420.2
(160.8)
—
—
—
(33.7)
(2.5)
(19.1)
1.3
205.4
The Company operates in foreign jurisdictions with income tax rates lower than the United States tax rate for the
fiscal years ended September 28, 2018, and September 29, 2017, which were 24.6% and 35.0%, respectively. The
Company’s tax benefits related to foreign earnings taxed at a rate less than the United States federal rate were
$111.9 million and $174.6 million for the fiscal years ended September 28, 2018, and September 29, 2017, respectively.
The Tax Reform Act includes, among other things, a reduction of the United States corporate tax rate from 35%
to 21%, a mandatory deemed repatriation tax on foreign earnings, repeal of the corporate alternative minimum tax
and the domestic production activities deduction, and expensing of certain capital investments. The new law makes
fundamental changes to the taxation of multinational entities, including a shift from worldwide taxation with deferral
to a hybrid territorial system, featuring a participation exemption regime, a minimum tax on low-taxed foreign
earnings, and new measures to deter base erosion and promote export from the United States. As a result of this
legislation, the Company recognized a one-time transition tax related to the deemed repatriation of foreign earnings
of $224.6 million, and a charge related to the revaluation of its deferred tax assets at the new corporate tax rate of
$18.3 million. The $224.6 million deemed repatriation tax is payable over the next eight years, $18.0 million per year
for each of the next five years, followed by payments of $33.6 million, $44.9 million, and $56.1 million in years six
through eight, respectively. The Company has accrued $206.6 million of the deemed repatriation tax in long-term
liabilities within the consolidated balance sheet as of September 28, 2018.
Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 (‘‘SAB 118’’) provides a measurement period during which companies may analyze
the impacts of newly enacted legislation when the company does not have the necessary information available,
prepared, or analyzed in reasonable detail to complete the accounting for certain income tax effects of the new
legislation, not to exceed one year. The Company does not expect to record any further adjustments within the
measurement period as of September 28, 2018, but will continue to monitor the estimate if new guidance becomes
available.
In addition to the introduction of a modified territorial tax system, the Tax Reform Act includes two new sets of
provisions aimed at preventing or decreasing U.S. tax base erosion—the global intangible low-taxed income
(‘‘GILTI’’) provisions and the base erosion and anti-abuse tax (‘‘BEAT’’) provisions. The GILTI provisions impose a
tax on foreign income in excess of a deemed return on tangible assets of foreign corporations. The Company expects
to make an accounting policy election to account for GILTI as a component of tax expense in the period in which the
Company is subject to the rules and therefore will not provide any deferred tax impacts of GILTI in its consolidated
financial statements for the year ended September 28, 2018. The BEAT provisions eliminate the deduction of certain
base-erosion payments made to related foreign corporations, and impose a minimum tax if greater than regular tax.
The Company does not presently expect that it will be subject to the minimum tax imposed by the BEAT provisions.
The Company’s federal income tax returns for fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2016 are currently under IRS examination.
As a result, the Company increased the reserve for uncertain tax positions by $18.9 million, including interest.
107
Annual Report Page 107
On October 2, 2010, the Company expanded its presence in Asia by launching operations in Singapore. The
Company operates under a tax holiday in Singapore, which is effective through September 30, 2020, and is conditional
upon the Company’s compliance with certain employment and investment thresholds in Singapore. The impact of the
tax holiday decreased Singapore’s taxes by $38.4 million and $37.4 million for the fiscal years ended September 28,
2018, and September 29, 2017, respectively, which resulted in tax benefits of $0.21 and $0.20 of diluted earnings per
share, respectively.
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities consist of the tax effects of temporary differences related to the
following (in millions):
Deferred tax assets:
Inventory
Bad debts
Accrued compensation and benefits
Product returns, allowances and warranty
Restructuring
Intangible assets
Share-based and other deferred compensation
Net operating loss carry forwards
Non-United States tax credits
State tax credits
Property, plant and equipment
Other, net
Deferred tax assets
Less valuation allowance
Net deferred tax assets
Deferred tax liabilities:
Prepaid insurance
Property, plant and equipment
Intangible assets
Other, net
Net deferred tax liabilities
Total net deferred tax assets
Fiscal Years Ended
September 28,
2018
September 29,
2017
$
$
5.7
1.2
4.9
4.6
—
—
26.1
15.5
20.3
97.0
9.1
3.3
187.7
(118.6)
69.1
(0.6)
(25.6)
(19.3)
(2.0)
(47.5)
$
21.6
$
7.4
0.1
7.1
5.2
0.1
10.6
40.2
7.7
20.1
71.0
7.9
2.7
180.1
(90.9)
89.2
(0.9)
(24.8)
(6.2)
—
(31.9)
57.3
In accordance with GAAP, management has determined that it is more likely than not that a portion of its historic
and current year income tax benefits will not be realized. As of September 28, 2018, the Company has a valuation
allowance of $118.6 million. This valuation allowance is comprised of $100.5 million related to United States state tax
credits, of which $1.5 million are state tax credits acquired from Avnera in fiscal 2018, and $18.1 million are related to
foreign deferred tax assets. The Company does not anticipate sufficient taxable income or tax liability to utilize these
state and foreign credits. If these benefits are recognized in a future period the valuation allowance on deferred tax
assets will be reversed and up to a $118.6 million income tax benefit may be recognized. The Company will need to
generate $88.5 million of future United States federal taxable income to utilize its United States deferred tax assets as
of September 28, 2018. The Company believes that future reversals of taxable temporary differences, and its forecast
of continued earnings in its domestic and foreign jurisdictions, support its decision to not record a valuation allowance
on other deferred tax assets.
Deferred tax assets are recognized for foreign operations when management believes it is more likely than not
that the deferred tax assets will be recovered during the carry forward period. The Company will continue to assess its
valuation allowance in future periods.
As of September 28, 2018, the Company has United States federal net operating loss carry forwards of
approximately $41.0 million, including $32.7 million related to the acquisition of Avnera. The utilization of these net
operating losses is subject to certain annual limitations as required under Internal Revenue Code section 382 and
Page 108 Annual Report
108
similar state income tax provisions. The United States federal net operating loss carry forwards expire at various dates
through 2035. The Company also has state income tax credit carry forwards of $97.0 million, net of federal benefits,
for which the Company has provided a valuation allowance. The state tax credits relate primarily to California
research tax credits that can be carried forward indefinitely.
The Company has continued to expand its operations and increase its investments in numerous international
jurisdictions. These activities will increase the Company’s earnings attributable to foreign jurisdictions. Due to the
enactment of the Tax Reform Act, all of the Company’s previously undistributed earnings were deemed repatriated
during the year ended September 28, 2018, resulting in a one-time transition tax of $224.6 million.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits is as follows (in millions):
Balance at September 29, 2017
Increases based on positions related to prior years
Decreases based on positions related to prior years
Increases based on positions related to current year
Decreases relating to settlements with taxing authorities
Decreases relating to lapses of applicable statutes of limitations
Balance at September 28, 2018
Unrecognized
tax benefits
$
$
90.4
13.5
(0.5)
0.5
—
(10.5)
93.4
Of the total unrecognized tax benefits at September 28, 2018, $77.7 million would impact the effective tax rate, if
recognized. The remaining unrecognized tax benefits would not impact the effective tax rate, if recognized, due to the
Company’s valuation allowance and certain positions that were required to be capitalized.
The Company anticipates reversals within the next 12 months related to items such as the lapse of the statute of
limitations, audit closures, and other items that occur in the normal course of business. Due to open examinations, an
estimate of anticipated reversals within the next 12 months cannot be made. During the fiscal year ended
September 28, 2018, the Company recognized $10.5 million of previously unrecognized tax benefits related to the
expiration of the statute of limitations and $4.1 million of accrued interest or penalties related to unrecognized tax
benefits. As of September 28, 2018, accrued interest and penalties of $7.5 million related to uncertain tax positions
have been included in long-term tax liabilities within the consolidated balance sheet.
The Company’s major tax jurisdictions as of September 28, 2018, are the United States, California, Canada,
Luxembourg, Mexico, Japan, and Singapore. For the United States, the Company has open tax years dating back to
fiscal 2000 due to the carry forward of tax attributes. For California, the Company has open tax years dating back to
fiscal 1999 due to the carry forward of tax attributes. For Canada, the Company has open tax years dating back to
fiscal 2012. For Luxembourg, the Company has open tax years back to fiscal 2012. For Mexico, the Company has open
tax years back to fiscal 2012. For Singapore, the Company has open tax years dating back to fiscal 2012. The Company
is subject to audit examinations by the respective taxing authorities on a periodic basis, of which the results could
impact its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
109
Annual Report Page 109
10. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
COMMON STOCK
At September 28, 2018, the Company is authorized to issue 525.0 million shares of common stock, par value $0.25
per share, of which 228.4 million shares are issued and 177.4 million shares are outstanding.
Holders of the Company’s common stock are entitled to dividends in the event declared by the Company’s Board
of Directors out of funds legally available for such purpose. Dividends may not be paid on common stock unless all
accrued dividends on preferred stock, if any, have been paid or declared and set aside. In the event of the Company’s
liquidation, dissolution or winding up, the holders of common stock will be entitled to share pro rata in the assets
remaining after payment to creditors and after payment of the liquidation preference plus any unpaid dividends to
holders of any outstanding preferred stock.
Each holder of the Company’s common stock is entitled to one vote for each such share outstanding in the
holder’s name. No holder of common stock is entitled to cumulate votes in voting for directors. The Company’s
restated certificate of incorporation as amended to date (the ‘‘Certificate of Incorporation’’) provides that, unless
otherwise determined by the Company’s Board of Directors, no holder of stock has any preemptive right to purchase
or subscribe for any stock of any class which the Company may issue or sell.
PREFERRED STOCK
The Company’s Certificate of Incorporation has authorized and permits the Company to issue up to 25.0 million
shares of preferred stock without par value in one or more series and with rights and preferences that may be fixed or
designated by the Company’s Board of Directors without any further action by the Company’s stockholders. The
designation, powers, preferences, rights and qualifications, limitations and restrictions of the preferred stock of each
series will be fixed by the certificate of designation relating to such series, which will specify the terms of the preferred
stock. At September 28, 2018, the Company had no shares of preferred stock issued or outstanding.
SHARE REPURCHASE
On January 31, 2018, the Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program, pursuant to which the
Company is authorized to repurchase up to $1.0 billion of its common stock from time to time prior to January 31,
2020, on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions as permitted by securities laws and other legal
requirements. This authorized stock repurchase program replaced in its entirety the January 17, 2017, stock
repurchase program. During the fiscal year ended September 28, 2018, the Company paid approximately
$759.5 million (including commissions) in connection with the repurchase of 7.7 million shares of its common stock
(paying an average price of $98.84 per share) under the January 31, 2018, stock repurchase plan and the January 17,
2017, stock repurchase plan. As of September 28, 2018, $413.0 million remained available under the January 31, 2018,
share repurchase plan.
During the fiscal year ended September 29, 2017, the Company paid approximately $432.3 million (including
commissions) in connection with the repurchase of 4.7 million shares of its common stock (paying an average price of
$92.97 per share).
Page 110 Annual Report
110
DIVIDENDS
On November 8, 2018, the Company announced that the Board of Directors had declared a cash dividend on the
Company’s common stock of $0.38 per share. This dividend is payable on December 18, 2018, to the Company’s
stockholders of record as of the close of business on November 27, 2018. Future dividends are subject to declaration
by the Board of Directors. The dividends charged to retained earnings in fiscal 2018 and 2017 were as follows (in
millions except per share amounts):
First quarter
Second quarter
Third quarter
Fourth quarter
Fiscal Years Ended
September 28,
2018
September 29,
2017
Per Share
Total
Per Share
Total
$
$
0.32
0.32
0.32
0.38
1.34
$
$
$
58.8
58.5
57.8
68.1
243.2
$
0.28
0.28
0.28
0.32
1.16
$
$
51.8
51.8
51.7
58.9
214.2
EMPLOYEE STOCK BENEFIT PLANS
As of September 28, 2018, the Company has the following equity compensation plans under which its equity
securities were authorized for issuance to its employees and/or directors:
• the 1999 Employee Long-Term Incentive Plan
• the 2002 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
• the Non-Qualified Employee Stock Purchase Plan
• the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan
• the AATI 2005 Equity Incentive Plan
• the 2008 Director Long-Term Incentive Plan
• the 2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan
Except for the 1999 Employee Long-Term Incentive Plan and the Non-Qualified Employee Stock Purchase Plan,
each of the foregoing equity compensation plans was approved by the Company’s stockholders.
As of September 28, 2018, a total of 85.3 million shares are authorized for grant under the Company’s share-
based compensation plans, with 1.9 million options outstanding. The number of common shares reserved for future
awards to employees and directors under these plans was 13.8 million at September 28, 2018. The Company currently
grants new equity awards to employees under the 2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan and to non-employee directors
under the 2008 Director Long-Term Incentive Plan.
2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan. Under this plan, officers, employees, non-employee directors and certain
consultants may be granted stock options, restricted stock awards and units, performance stock awards and units and
other share-based awards. The plan has been approved by the stockholders. Under the plan, up to 19.4 million shares
have been authorized for grant. A total of 13.1 million shares are available for new grants as of September 28, 2018.
The maximum contractual term of options under the plan is seven years from the date of grant. Options granted
under the plan are exercisable at the determination of the compensation committee and generally vest ratably over
four years. Restricted stock awards and units granted under the plan at the determination of the compensation
committee generally vest over four or more years. With respect to restricted stock awards, dividends are accumulated
and paid when the underlying shares vest. If the underlying shares are forfeited for any reason, the rights to the
dividends with respect to such shares are also forfeited. No dividends or dividend equivalents are paid or accrued with
respect to restricted stock unit awards or other awards until the shares underlying such awards become vested and are
issued to the award holder. Performance stock awards and units are contingently granted depending on the
achievement of certain predetermined performance goals and generally vest over two or more years.
111
Annual Report Page 111
2008 Director Long-Term Incentive Plan. Under this plan, non-employee directors may be granted stock options,
restricted stock awards and other share-based awards. The plan has been approved by the stockholders. Under the
plan a total of 1.5 million shares have been authorized for grant. A total of 0.7 million shares are available for new
grants as of September 28, 2018. The maximum contractual term of options granted under the plan is ten years from
the date of grant. Options granted under the plan are generally exercisable over four years. Restricted stock awards
and units granted under the plan generally vest over one or more years. With respect to restricted stock awards,
dividends are accumulated and paid when the underlying shares vest. If the underlying shares are forfeited for any
reason, the rights to the dividends with respect to such shares are also forfeited.
Employee Stock Purchase Plans. The Company maintains a domestic and an international employee stock
purchase plan. Under these plans, eligible employees may purchase common stock through payroll deductions of up
to 10% of their compensation. The price per share is the lower of 85% of the fair market value of the common stock
at the beginning or end of each offering period (generally six months). The plans provide for purchases by employees
of up to an aggregate of 9.7 million shares. Shares of common stock purchased under these plans in the fiscal years
ended September 28, 2018, September 29, 2017, and September 30, 2016, were 0.2 million, 0.2 million, and 0.3 million,
respectively. At September 28, 2018, there are 0.5 million shares available for purchase. The Company recognized
compensation expense of $5.2 million, $4.5 million and $4.6 million for the fiscal years ended September 28, 2018,
September 29, 2017, and September 30, 2016, respectively, related to the employee stock purchase plan. The
unrecognized compensation expense on the employee stock purchase plan at September 28, 2018, was $1.9 million.
The weighted average period over which the cost is expected to be recognized is approximately four months.
Stock Options
The following table represents a summary of the Company’s stock options:
Balance outstanding at September 29, 2017
Granted
Exercised
Canceled/forfeited
Balance outstanding at September 28, 2018
Exercisable at September 28, 2018
Shares
(in millions)
Weighted average
exercise price
Weighted average
remaining
contractual life
(in years)
Aggregate
intrinsic value
(in millions)
3.0
0.1
(1.1)
(0.1)
1.9
1.2
$
$
$
$
$
$
50.36
26.66
35.92
72.42
57.12
50.15
3.0
2.3
$
$
64.3
50.8
The weighted-average grant date fair value per share of employee stock options granted during the fiscal years
ended September 28, 2018, September 29, 2017, and September 30, 2016, was $68.32, $23.25, and $26.30, respectively.
The increase in the weighted-average grant date fair value per share of employee stock options granted during fiscal
2018 was due to replacement awards granted as a result of the Avnera acquisition completed during the period. The
total grant date fair value of the options vested during the fiscal years ended September 28, 2018, September 29, 2017,
and September 30, 2016, was $22.6 million, $19.3 million and $21.9 million, respectively.
Page 112 Annual Report
112
Restricted and Performance Awards and Units
The following table represents a summary of the Company’s restricted and performance awards and units:
Non-vested awards outstanding at September 29, 2017
Granted(1)
Vested
Canceled/forfeited
Non-vested awards outstanding at September 28, 2018
Shares
(In millions)
Weighted
average
grant date
fair value
2.9
1.3
(1.2)
(0.3)
2.7
$
$
$
$
$
75.49
108.86
69.55
86.64
92.37
(1) includes performance shares granted and earned based on maximum performance under the underlying
performance metrics
The weighted average grant date fair value per share for awards granted during the fiscal years ended
September 28, 2018, September 29, 2017, and September 30, 2016, was $108.86, $72.84, and $62.02, respectively. The
total grant date fair value of the awards vested during the fiscal years ended September 28, 2018, September 29, 2017,
and September 30, 2016, was $81.1 million, $57.9 million and $71.2 million, respectively.
The following table summarizes the total intrinsic value for stock options exercised and awards vested (in
millions):
Awards
Options
Valuation and Expense Information
Fiscal Years Ended
September 28,
2018
September 29,
2017
September 30,
2016
$
$
134.4
75.0
$
$
137.8
116.1
$
$
197.6
68.9
The following table summarizes pre-tax share-based compensation expense by financial statement line and
related tax benefit (in millions):
Cost of goods sold
Research and development
Selling, general and administrative
Total share-based compensation expense
Share-based compensation tax benefit
Capitalized share-based compensation expense at period
end
Fiscal Years Ended
September 28,
2018
September 29,
2017
September 30,
2016
$
$
$
$
14.4
42.6
50.8
107.8
25.6
2.9
$
$
$
$
13.6
35.3
39.6
88.5
25.1
4.0
$
$
$
$
11.3
32.2
34.5
78.0
22.5
3.7
The following table summarizes total compensation costs related to unvested share based awards not yet
recognized and the weighted average period over which it is expected to be recognized at September 28, 2018:
Awards
Options
Unrecognized
compensation
cost for unvested
awards
(in millions)
$
$
106.1
11.1
Weighted average
remaining
recognition period
(in years)
1.5
1.1
113
Annual Report Page 113
The fair value of the restricted stock awards and units is equal to the closing market price of the Company’s
common stock on the date of grant.
The Company issued performance share units during fiscal 2018, fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2016 that contained
market-based conditions. The fair value of these performance share units was estimated on the date of the grant using
a Monte Carlo simulation with the following weighted average assumptions:
Volatility of common stock
Average volatility of peer companies
Average correlation coefficient of peer companies
Risk-free interest rate
Dividend yield
Fiscal Year Ended
September 28,
2018
September 29,
2017
September 30,
2016
35.54%
36.78%
0.47
1.74%
1.15%
39.60%
39.78%
0.42
0.68%
1.44%
38.24%
34.76%
0.49
0.44%
1.23%
The fair value of each stock option is estimated on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing
model with the following weighted average assumptions:
Expected volatility
Risk-free interest rate
Dividend yield
Expected option life (in years)
Fiscal Years Ended
September 28,
2018
September 29,
2017
September 30,
2016
35.86%
2.00%
1.15%
4.0
40.31%
1.60%
1.44%
4.0
42.93%
0.98%
1.23%
4.0
The Company used a historical volatility calculated by the mean reversion of the weekly-adjusted closing stock
price over the expected life of the options. The risk-free interest rate assumption is based upon observed treasury bill
interest rates appropriate for the expected life of the Company’s employee stock options. The dividend yield was
calculated based on the annualized dividend and the stock price on the date of grant.
The expected life of employee stock options represents a calculation based upon the historical exercise,
cancellation and forfeiture experience for the Company across its demographic population. The Company believes
that this historical data is the best estimate of the expected life of a new option and that generally all groups of the
Company’s employees exhibit similar behavior.
On November 15, 2017, the Company agreed to potentially issue not more than 1%of its common stock to an
unaffiliated third party as a contingent consideration for its role under a multi-year collaboration agreement, upon the
achievement of certain product sales milestones. The shares have been valued utilizing a probability weighted series of
Black-Scholes pricing models and could be issued after mid-2020. The shares will be marked to estimated fair value
each reporting period through earnings. The amount recorded in the statement of operations within selling, general
and administrative expense for the fiscal year ended 2018, is not material.
11. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN, PENSIONS AND OTHER RETIREE BENEFITS
The Company maintains a 401(k) plan covering substantially all of its employees based in the United States under
which all employees at least twenty-one years old are eligible to receive discretionary Company contributions.
Discretionary Company contributions in the form of cash are determined by the Board of Directors. The Company
has generally contributed a match of up to 4% of an employee’s contributed annual eligible compensation. The
Company no longer provides shares of its common stock as contributions to the 401(k) plan.
Defined Benefit Pension:
The Company has a defined benefit pension plan for certain employees in Japan. This plan has been frozen and
new employees are not eligible. However, the Company is obligated to make future contributions to fund benefits to
Page 114 Annual Report
114
the participants with the benefits under the plan being based primarily on a combination of years of service and
compensation.
The net amount of the unfunded obligation recognized in other long-term liabilities on the balance sheet consists
of (in millions):
Pension benefit obligations at the end of the fiscal year
Fair value of plan assets at the end of the fiscal year
Unfunded status, net
Fiscal Year Ended
September 28,
2018
September 29,
2017
$
$
16.1 $
11.3
(4.8) $
17.0
11.5
(5.5)
The pension obligation and the net periodic benefit costs associated with the pension have an immaterial impact
to the Company’s results of operations and financial position and accordingly, the disclosures required have been
excluded from this Annual Report.
12. COMMITMENTS
The Company has various operating leases primarily for buildings, computers and equipment. Rent expense
amounted to $20.5 million, $20.6 million, and $19.5 million in the fiscal years ended September 28, 2018,
September 29, 2017, and September 30, 2016, respectively. Future minimum payments under these non-cancelable
leases for the next five fiscal years are as follows (in millions):
Future minimum payments
2019
$21.6
2020
18.3
2021
14.2
2022
12.2
2023
5.3
Thereafter
15.2
Total
$86.8
13. CONTINGENCIES
Legal Matters
From time to time, various lawsuits, claims and proceedings have been, and may in the future be, instituted or
asserted against the Company, including those pertaining to patent infringement, intellectual property, environmental
hazards, product liability and warranty, safety and health, employment and contractual matters.
The semiconductor industry is characterized by vigorous protection and pursuit of intellectual property rights.
From time to time, third parties have asserted and may in the future assert patent, copyright, trademark and other
intellectual property rights to technologies that are important to the Company’s business and have demanded and may
in the future demand that the Company license their technology. The outcome of any such litigation cannot be
predicted with certainty and some such lawsuits, claims or proceedings may be disposed of unfavorably to the
Company. Generally speaking, intellectual property disputes often have a risk of injunctive relief, which, if imposed
against the Company, could materially and adversely affect the Company’s financial condition, or results of
operations. From time to time the Company may also be involved in legal proceedings in the ordinary course of
business.
The Company monitors the status of legal proceedings and other contingencies on an ongoing basis to ensure loss
contingencies are recognized and/or disclosed in its financial statements and footnotes. The Company does not believe
there are any pending legal proceedings that are reasonably possible to result in a material loss. The Company is
engaged in various legal actions in the normal course of business and, while there can be no assurances, the Company
believes the outcome of all pending litigation involving the Company will not have, individually or in the aggregate, a
material adverse effect on its business or financial statements.
115
Annual Report Page 115
14. GUARANTEES AND INDEMNITIES
The Company has made no significant contractual guarantees for the benefit of third parties. However, the
Company generally indemnifies its customers from third-party intellectual property infringement litigation claims
related to its products, and, on occasion, also provides other indemnities related to product sales. In connection with
certain facility leases, the Company has indemnified its lessors for certain claims arising from the facility or the lease.
The Company indemnifies its directors and officers to the maximum extent permitted under the laws of the state
of Delaware. The duration of the indemnities varies, and in many cases is indefinite. The indemnities to customers in
connection with product sales generally are subject to limits based upon the amount of the related product sales and
in many cases are subject to geographic and other restrictions. In certain instances, the Company’s indemnities do not
provide for any limitation of the maximum potential future payments the Company could be obligated to make. The
Company has not recorded any liability for these indemnities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and
does not expect that such obligations will have a material adverse impact on its financial statements.
15. RESTRUCTURING AND OTHER CHARGES
During fiscal 2018, the Company recorded restructuring and other charges of approximately $0.8 million related
to a leased facility. The Company does not anticipate any material charges in future periods related to these plans.
Charges associated with the restructuring plan are categorized in the ‘‘Other restructuring programs’’ in the table
below.
During fiscal 2017, the Company implemented immaterial restructuring plans and recorded $0.6 million related
to employee severance and other costs.
During fiscal 2016, the Company recorded restructuring and other charges of approximately $4.8 million
primarily related to restructuring plans to reduce redundancies associated with acquisitions during the year.
16. EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share (in millions, except per
share amounts):
Net income
Weighted average shares outstanding—basic
Dilutive effect of equity based awards
Weighted average shares outstanding—diluted
Net income per share—basic
Net income per share—diluted
Anti-dilutive common stock equivalents
Fiscal Years Ended
September 28,
2018
September 29,
2017
September 30,
2016
$
$
$
918.4 $
1,010.2 $
181.3
1.9
183.2
5.06 $
5.01 $
0.2
184.3
2.4
186.7
5.48 $
5.41 $
0.6
995.2
188.7
3.4
192.1
5.27
5.18
1.5
Basic earnings per share are calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares of the
Company’s common stock outstanding during the period. The calculation of diluted earnings per share includes the
dilutive effect of equity based awards that were outstanding during the fiscal years ended September 28, 2018,
September 29, 2017, and September 30, 2016, using the treasury stock method. Certain of the Company’s outstanding
share-based awards, noted in the table above, were excluded because they were anti-dilutive, but they could become
dilutive in the future.
Page 116 Annual Report
116
17. SEGMENT INFORMATION AND CONCENTRATIONS
The Company considers itself to be a single reportable operating segment which designs, develops, manufactures
and markets similar proprietary semiconductor products, including intellectual property. In reaching this conclusion,
management considers the definition of the chief operating decision maker (‘‘CODM’’), how the business is defined
by the CODM, the nature of the information provided to the CODM and how that information is used to make
operating decisions, allocate resources and assess performance. The Company’s CODM is the president and chief
executive officer. The results of operations provided to and analyzed by the CODM are at the consolidated level and
accordingly, key resource decisions and assessment of performance is performed at the consolidated level. The
Company assesses its determination of operating segments at least annually.
GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
Net revenue by geographic area presented based upon the location of the OEMs’ headquarters are as follows
(in millions):
United States
China
South Korea
Taiwan
Europe, Middle East and Africa
Other Asia-Pacific
Total
Fiscal Years Ended
September 28,
2018
September 29,
2017
September 30,
2016
$
$
1,946.2 $
982.8
432.7
339.1
144.6
22.6
3,868.0 $
1,615.4 $
1,018.8
531.8
335.4
117.4
32.6
3,651.4 $
1,455.0
971.2
393.0
323.6
102.1
44.1
3,289.0
During fiscal 2018, the Company updated the table above from prior period presentation of net revenue based on
the country of destination to current period presentation of net revenue based on the location of the OEMs’
headquarters. Prior periods have been reclassified to match the current period presentation.
The Company’s revenue to external customers is generated principally from the sale of semiconductor products
that facilitate various wireless communication applications. Accordingly, the Company considers its product offerings
to be similar in nature and therefore not segregated for reporting purposes.
Net property, plant and equipment balances, based on the physical locations within the indicated geographic
areas are as follows (in millions):
Mexico
Japan
United States
Singapore
Rest of world
CONCENTRATIONS
As of
September 28,
2018
September 29,
2017
$
$
449.4 $
328.4
123.5
222.7
16.9
1,140.9 $
465.9
166.4
126.9
112.1
11.0
882.3
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentration of credit risk consist principally of
trade accounts receivable. Trade accounts receivable are primarily derived from sales to manufacturers of
communications and consumer products and electronic component distributors. Ongoing credit evaluations of
customers’ financial condition are performed and collateral, such as letters of credit and bank guarantees, are
required whenever deemed necessary.
117
Annual Report Page 117
In fiscal 2018, 2017, and 2016, Apple, through sales to multiple distributors, contract manufacturers and direct
sales for multiple applications including smartphones, tablets, desktop and notebook computers, watches and other
devices, in the aggregate accounted for 47%, 39% and 40% of the Company’s net revenue, respectively. In fiscal 2017
and 2016, Samsung in the aggregate accounted for 12% and 10% of the Company’s net revenue, respectively. In fiscal
2017, Huawei in the aggregate accounted for 10% of the Company’s net revenue.
At September 28, 2018, the Company’s three largest accounts receivable balances comprised 66% of aggregate
gross accounts receivable. This concentration was 53% and 54% at September 29, 2017, and September 30, 2016,
respectively.
18. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
The following table summarizes the quarterly and annual results (in millions, except per share data):
Fiscal 2018
Net revenue
Gross profit
Net income
Per share data(1)
Net income, basic
Net income, diluted
Fiscal 2017
Net revenue
Gross profit
Net income
Per share data(1)
Net income, basic
Net income, diluted
First
quarter
Second
quarter
Third
quarter
Fourth
quarter
Fiscal
year
$
$
$
$
$
$
1,051.9 $
536.8
70.4
0.38 $
0.38 $
914.3 $
463.9
257.8
1.39 $
1.38 $
913.4 $
458.7
276.0
1.51 $
1.50 $
851.7 $
425.4
224.9
1.22 $
1.20 $
894.3 $
451.6
286.5
1.58 $
1.57 $
900.8 $
453.6
246.2
1.34 $
1.32 $
1,008.4 $
503.6
285.5
1.60 $
1.58 $
984.6 $
498.9
281.3
1.53 $
1.51 $
3,868.0
1,950.7
918.4
5.06
5.01
3,651.4
1,841.8
1,010.2
5.48
5.41
(1) Earnings per share calculations for each of the quarters are based on the weighted average number of
shares outstanding and included common stock equivalents in each period. Therefore, the sums of the
quarters do not necessarily equal the full year earnings per share.
Page 118 Annual Report
118
Report of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors
Skyworks Solutions, Inc.:
Opinions on the Consolidated Financial Statements and Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Skyworks Solutions, Inc. and subsidiaries (the
Company) as of September 28, 2018 and September 29, 2017, the related consolidated statements of operations,
comprehensive income, cash flows, and stockholders’ equity for each of the years in the three-year period ended
September 28, 2018, and the related notes (collectively, the ‘‘consolidated financial statements’’). We also have
audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of September 28, 2018, based on criteria
established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of
the Treadway Commission.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the
financial position of the Company as of September 28, 2018 and September 29, 2017, and the results of its operations
and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended September 28, 2018, in conformity with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects,
effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 28, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal
Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission.
Basis for Opinions
The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective
internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and an opinion on the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered
with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent
with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of
material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting
was maintained in all material respects.
Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material
misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that
respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and
disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated
financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating
the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included
performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide
a reasonable basis for our opinions.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
119
Annual Report Page 119
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting
includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable
assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in
accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance
regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that
could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect
misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that
controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies
or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ KPMG LLP
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2002.
Irvine, California
November 14, 2018
Page 120 Annual Report
120
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants
on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity,
Related Stockholder Matters and
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
MARKET INFORMATION AND DIVIDENDS
Our common stock is traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol ‘‘SWKS’’.
The number of stockholders of record of our common stock as of November 7, 2018, was 12,404. On November 8,
2018, the Company announced that the Board of Directors had declared a cash dividend of $0.38 per share of
common stock, payable on December 18, 2018, to stockholders of record as of November 27, 2018. We intend to
continue to pay quarterly dividends subject to capital availability and our view that cash dividends are in the best
interests of our stockholders. Future cash dividends may be affected by, among other items, our views on potential
future capital requirements, including those relating to research and development, creation and expansion of sales
distribution channels and investments and acquisitions, legal risks, stock repurchase programs, debt issuance, changes
in federal and state income tax law and changes to our business model.
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
The following table provides information regarding repurchases of common stock made during the fiscal quarter
ended September 28, 2018:
Period
6/30/18-7/27/18
7/28/18-8/24/18
8/25/18-9/28/18
Total
Total Number of
Shares
Purchased
Average
Price Paid
per Share
829,906(2)
718,516(3)
1,002,162(4)
2,550,584
$
$
$
97.56
93.61
87.13
Total Number of
Shares Purchased
as Part of
Publicly Announced
Plans or
Programs(1)
828,483
715,597
1,000,000
2,544,080
Maximum Number
(or Approximate
Dollar Value) of
Shares that May
Yet Be Purchased
Under the Plans or
Programs(1)
$567.1 million
$500.1 million
$413.0 million
(1) The stock repurchase program approved by the Board of Directors on January 31, 2018, authorizes the
repurchase of up to $1.0 billion of our common stock from time to time on the open market or in privately
negotiated transactions as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements. The January 31, 2018, stock
repurchase program replaces in its entirety the January 17, 2017, plan and is scheduled to expire on January 31,
2020.
(2) 828,483 shares were repurchased at an average price of $97.56 per share as part of our stock repurchase program,
and 1,423 shares were repurchased by us at the fair market value of the common stock as of the applicable
purchase date, in connection with the satisfaction of tax withholding obligations under equity award agreements
with an average price of $96.91 per share.
(3) 715,597 shares were repurchased at an average price of $93.62 per share as part of our stock repurchase program,
and 2,919 shares were repurchased by us at the fair market value of the common stock as of the applicable
purchase date, in connection with the satisfaction of tax withholding obligations under equity award agreements
with an average price of $91.52 per share.
121
Annual Report Page 121
(4) 1,000,000 shares were repurchased at an average price of $87.12 per share as part of our stock repurchase
program, and 2,162 shares were repurchased by us at the fair market value of the common stock as of the
applicable purchase date, in connection with the satisfaction of tax withholding obligations under equity award
agreements with an average price of $93.02 per share.
On November 15, 2017, we agreed to potentially issue not more than 1% of our common stock to an unaffiliated
third party as contingent consideration for its role under a multi-year collaboration agreement. The shares are
issuable for no cash payment but only upon the achievement of certain product sale milestones, certain terminations
of the agreement or if the Company engages in certain competition with the third party. Though the timing is not
certain, the Company does not expect achievement of the product sale milestones to occur any time prior to mid-2020.
The transaction was made in reliance on the exemption from registration in Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act. The
Company has agreed to file a registration statement with the SEC registering the resale of any issued shares.
Page 122 Annual Report
122
Comparative Stock Performance Graph
The following graph shows the change in Skyworks’ cumulative total stockholder return for the last five fiscal
years, based upon the market price of Skyworks’ common stock, compared with: (i) the cumulative total return on the
Standard & Poor’s 500 Index and (ii) the Standard & Poor’s 500 Semiconductor Index. The graph assumes a total
initial investment of $100 on September 27, 2013, and shows a ‘‘Total Return’’ that assumes reinvestment of dividends,
if any, and is based on market capitalization at the beginning of each period.
Comparison of Cumulative Five-Year Total Return
Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
S&P 500 Index
S&P 500 Semiconductors
S
R
A
L
L
O
D
500
400
300
200
100
0
09/27/13
10/03/14
10/02/15
09/30/16
09/29/17
09/28/18
Years Ending
19MAR201910152290
Total Return to Shareholders
(Includes reinvestment of dividends)
ANNUAL RETURN PERCENTAGE
Company / Index
Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
S&P 500 Index
S&P 500 Semiconductors
INDEXED RETURNS
Company / Index
Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
S&P 500 Index
S&P 500 Semiconductors
Years Ending
10/3/14
10/2/15
9/30/16
9/29/17
9/28/18
124.12
18.78
39.19
53.35
1.23
(1.62)
(7.95)
13.56
36.62
35.54
18.61
26.71
(9.80)
17.91
27.59
Years Ending
Base Period
9/27/13
10/3/14
10/2/15
9/30/16
9/29/17
9/28/18
100
100
100
224.12
118.78
139.19
343.68
120.24
136.93
316.35
136.54
187.08
428.79
161.95
237.04
386.76
190.95
302.43
123
Annual Report Page 123
(This page has been left blank intentionally.)
(This page has been left blank intentionally.)
26MAR201919161
Executive Management
Board of Directors
Liam K. Griffin
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Carlos S. Bori
Senior Vice President, Sales and Marketing
Kari A. Durham
Senior Vice President, Human Resources
Peter L. Gammel
Chief Technology Officer
Reza Kasnavi
Vice President, Central Engineering and Quality
Manpreet S. Khaira
Vice President and General Manager, AI Solutions
Joel R. King
Senior Vice President and General Manager, Mobile Solutions
Steven C. Machuga
Vice President, Worldwide Operations
Kris Sennesael
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
David Stasey
Vice President and General Manager, Diversified Analog Solutions
Robert J. Terry
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
David J. Aldrich
Chairman of the Board, Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
Kevin L. Beebe
President and Chief Executive Officer, 2BPartners, LLC
Timothy R. Furey
Chief Executive Officer, MarketBridge
Liam K. Griffin
President and Chief Executive Officer, Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
Balakrishnan S. Iyer
Retired Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Conexant Systems, Inc.
Christine King
Retired Executive Chairman, QLogic Corporation
David P. McGlade
Chairman of the Board, Intelsat S.A.
David J. McLachlan
Lead Independent Director, Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
Retired Chief Financial Officer and Senior Advisor to Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer, Genzyme Corporation
Robert A. Schriesheim
Chairman, Truax Partners LLC
Kimberly S. Stevenson
Venture Partner, RIDGE-LANE Limited Partners
Transfer Agent and Registrar
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company
6201 15th Avenue
Brooklyn, NY 11219
(800) 937-5449 (United States and Canada)
(718) 921-8124 (outside United States)
www.astfinancial.com
Our transfer agent can help you with a variety of stockholder related
services including change of address, lost stock certificates, stock
transfers, account status and other administrative matters.
Independent Registered
Public Accountants
KPMG LLP
Executive Offices
Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
5221 California Avenue
Irvine, CA 92617
(949) 231-3000
20 Sylvan Road
Woburn, MA 01801
(781) 376-3000
Investor Relations
Common Stock
You can contact Skyworks’ Investor Relations team directly to order
an Investor’s Kit or to ask investment-oriented questions about
Skyworks at:
Skyworks common stock is traded on the Nasdaq Global Select
Market® under the symbol SWKS.
Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
5221 California Avenue
Irvine, CA 92617
(949) 231-3433
investor.relations@skyworksinc.com
You can also view this annual report along with other financial related
information and other public filings with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission at: www.skyworksinc.com.
Annual Meeting
The annual meeting of stockholders will be held on
May 8, 2019, in Burlington, Massachusetts.
www.skyworksinc.com
Page X | Proxy Statement Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholder Meeting of
Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
To Be Held On:
May 8, 2019 at 2:00 p.m.
at the Boston Marriott Burlington, 1 Burlington Mall Road, Burlington, MA 01803
JOHN SMITH
1234 MAIN STREET
APT. 203
NEW YORK, NY 10038
COMPANY NUMBER
ACCOUNT NUMBER
CONTROL NUMBER
This communication is not a form for voting and presents only an overview of the more complete proxy materials that are available
to you on the Internet or by mail. We encourage you to access and review all of the important information contained in the proxy
materials before voting.
If you want to receive a paper or e-mail copy of the proxy materials you must request one. There is no charge to you for requesting a
copy. To facilitate timely delivery please make the request as instructed below before April 26, 2019.
Please visit http://www.skyworksinc.com/annualreport, where the following materials are available for view:
• Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders
• Proxy Statement
• Form of Electronic Proxy Card
• Annual Report on Form 10-K
TO REQUEST PAPER OR E-MAIL TELEPHONE: 888-Proxy-NA (888-776-9962) or 718-921-8562 (for international callers)
COPIES OF THE PROXY MATERIALS: E-MAIL: info@astfinancial.com
WEBSITE: https://us.astfinancial.com/OnlineProxyVoting/ProxyVoting/RequestMaterials/
TO VOTE:
INTERNET: To access your online proxy card, please visit www.voteproxy.com and follow the on-screen
instructions or scan the QR code on the left with your smartphone. You may enter your voting instructions
at www.voteproxy.com up until 11:59 PM EDT the day before the cut-off or meeting date.
IN PERSON: You may vote your shares in person by attending the Annual Meeting.
TELEPHONE: To vote by telephone, please visit www.voteproxy.com to view the materials and to
obtain the toll-free number to call.
MAIL: You may request a card by following the instructions above.
PROPOSAL 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS:
(TERM TO EXPIRE AT THE NEXT ANNUAL MEETING)
PROPOSAL 2: To ratify the selection by the Company’s Audit Committee of KPMG LLP as the
independent registered public accounting firm for the Company for fiscal year 2019.
PROPOSAL 3: To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named
executive officers, as described in the Company’s Proxy Statement.
PROPOSAL 4: To approve a stockholder proposal regarding supermajority voting provisions.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF EACH OF
THE NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR NAMED IN PROPOSAL 1 AND “FOR” PROPOSALS 2 AND 3,
AND MAKES NO RECOMMENDATION ON PROPOSAL 4.
NOMINEES:
David J. Aldrich
Kevin L. Beebe
Timothy R. Furey
Liam K. Griffin
Balakrishnan S. Iyer
Christine King
David P. McGlade
Robert A. Schriesheim
Kimberly S. Stevenson
Please note that you cannot use this notice to vote by mail
or otherwise.
SAMPLE ------------------ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
----------------
0
SKYWORKS SOLUTIONS, INC.
Proxy for Annual Meeting of Stockholders
May 8, 2019
SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The undersigned hereby appoints Liam K. Griffin and Robert J. Terry, and each of them singly, proxies,
with full power of substitution to vote all shares of stock of Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (the "Company"), that the
undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Skyworks Solutions, Inc., to be held at
2:00 p.m., local time, on May 8, 2019, at the Boston Marriott Burlington, 1 Burlington Mall Road, Burlington,
Massachusetts, or at any adjournment or postponement thereof, upon matters set forth in the Notice of Annual
Meeting of Stockholders and 2019 Proxy Statement, a copy of which has been received by the undersigned.
The proxies are further authorized to vote, in their discretion, upon such other business as may properly come
before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.
OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS ENCOURAGES STOCKHOLDERS TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL
MEETING. WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND, YOU ARE URGED TO SUBMIT A PROXY
PROMPTLY IN ONE OF THE FOLLOWING WAYS: (A) BY COMPLETING, SIGNING, AND DATING THE
ACCOMPANYING PROXY CARD AND RETURNING IT IN THE POSTAGE-PREPAID ENVELOPE
ENCLOSED FOR THAT PURPOSE; (B) BY COMPLETING AND SUBMITTING YOUR PROXY USING THE
TOLL-FREE TELEPHONE NUMBER LISTED ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THIS PROXY CARD; OR (C) BY
COMPLETING AND SUBMITTING YOUR PROXY VIA THE INTERNET BY VISITING THE WEBSITE
ADDRESS LISTED ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THIS PROXY CARD. A PROMPT RESPONSE WILL
GREATLY FACILITATE ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE MEETING AND YOUR COOPERATION WILL BE
APPRECIATED.
1.1
(Continued and to be signed on the reverse side)
14475
SAMPLE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF
SKYWORKS SOLUTIONS, INC.
May 8, 2019
GO GREEN
e-Consent makes it easy to go paperless. With e-Consent, you can quickly access your proxy
materials, statements and other eligible documents online, while reducing costs, clutter and
paper waste. Enroll today at www.astfinancial.com to enjoy online access.
NOTICE OF INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS:
The Notice of Meeting, Proxy Statement, and sample proxy card
are available at www.skyworksinc.com/annualreport
Please sign, date, and mail
your proxy card in the
postage-prepaid envelope provided
as soon as possible.
Please detach along perforated line and mail in the envelope provided.
00003333333333330100 4
050819
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE "FOR" THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR NAMED IN PROPOSAL 1
AND "FOR" PROPOSALS 2 AND 3, AND MAKES NO RECOMMENDATION ON PROPOSAL 4.
PLEASE SIGN, DATE, AND RETURN PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. PLEASE MARK YOUR VOTE IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS SHOWN HERE x
THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED
BY THE UNDERSIGNED STOCKHOLDER(S). IF NO DIRECTION IS GIVEN, THIS PROXY WILL
BE VOTED "FOR" THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR NAMED IN
PROPOSAL 1, "FOR" PROPOSALS 2 AND 3, AND “ABSTAIN” ON PROPOSAL 4. THE
PROXIES WILL VOTE IN THEIR DISCRETION ON ANY OTHER BUSINESS AS MAY PROPERLY
COME BEFORE THE MEETING AND ANY ADJOURNMENT OR POSTPONEMENT THEREOF.
ELECTRONIC ACCESS TO FUTURE DOCUMENTS
If you would like to receive future shareholder communications over the Internet exclusively, and no
longer receive any material by mail, please visit http://www.astfinancial.com. Click on Shareholder
Account Access to enroll. Please enter your account number and tax identification number to log
in, then select Receive Company Mailings via E-Mail and provide your e-mail address.
1. To elect the following nine individuals nominated to serve as directors of the Company with terms expiring at the next
annual meeting of stockholders.
FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
David J. Aldrich
Kevin L. Beebe
Timothy R. Furey
Liam K. Griffin
Balakrishnan S. Iyer
Christine King
David P. McGlade
Robert A. Schriesheim
Kimberly S. Stevenson
2. To ratify the selection by the Company’s Audit Committee of KPMG LLP as the
independent registered public accounting firm for the Company for fiscal year 2019.
3. To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive
officers, as described in the Company's Proxy Statement.
4. To approve a stockholder proposal regarding supermajority voting provisions.
To change the address on your account, please check the box at right and
indicate your new address in the address space above. Please note that
changes to the registered name(s) on the account may not be submitted via
this method.
I/We will attend the annual meeting.
Signature of Stockholder Date: Signature of Stockholder Date:
Note: Please sign exactly as your name or names appear on this Proxy. When shares are held jointly, each holder should sign. When signing as executor, administrator, attorney, trustee, or guardian, please give full
title as such. If the signer is a corporation, partnership, limited liability company, or other entity, please sign full entity name by duly authorized officer, giving full title as such.
SAMPLE
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF
SKYWORKS SOLUTIONS, INC.
May 8, 2019
PROXY VOTING INSTRUCTIONS
INTERNET - Access “www.voteproxy.com” and follow the on-screen
instructions or scan the QR code on the right with your smartphone.
Have your proxy card available when you access the website.
TELEPHONE - Call toll-free 1-800-PROXIES (1-800-776-9437) in
the United States or 1-718-921-8500 from foreign countries from
any touch-tone telephone and follow the instructions. Have your
proxy card available when you call.
Vote online or by phone until 11:59 p.m. EDT the day before the
meeting.
MAIL - Sign, date, and mail your proxy card in the postage-prepaid
envelope provided as soon as possible.
IN PERSON - You may vote your shares in person by attending
the Annual Meeting.
GO GREEN - e-Consent makes it easy to go paperless. With
e-Consent, you can quickly access your proxy materials, statements
and other eligible documents online, while reducing costs, clutter
and paper waste. Enroll today at www.astfinancial.com to enjoy
online access.
COMPANY NUMBER
ACCOUNT NUMBER
CONTROL NUMBER
NOTICE OF INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS: The Notice of Meeting, Proxy Statement, and
sample proxy card are available at www.skyworksinc.com/annualreport
Please detach along perforated line and mail in the envelope provided IF you are not voting via telephone or the Internet.
00003333333333330100 4
050819
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE "FOR" THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR NAMED IN PROPOSAL 1
AND "FOR" PROPOSALS 2 AND 3, AND MAKES NO RECOMMENDATION ON PROPOSAL 4.
PLEASE SIGN, DATE, AND RETURN PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. PLEASE MARK YOUR VOTE IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS SHOWN HERE
x
THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED
BY THE UNDERSIGNED STOCKHOLDER(S). IF NO DIRECTION IS GIVEN, THIS PROXY WILL
BE VOTED "FOR" THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR NAMED IN
PROPOSAL 1, "FOR" PROPOSALS 2 AND 3, AND “ABSTAIN” ON PROPOSAL 4. THE
PROXIES WILL VOTE IN THEIR DISCRETION ON ANY OTHER BUSINESS AS MAY PROPERLY
COME BEFORE THE MEETING AND ANY ADJOURNMENT OR POSTPONEMENT THEREOF.
ELECTRONIC ACCESS TO FUTURE DOCUMENTS
If you would like to receive future shareholder communications over the Internet exclusively, and no
longer receive any material by mail, please visit http://www.astfinancial.com. Click on Shareholder
Account Access to enroll. Please enter your account number and tax identification number to log
in, then select Receive Company Mailings via E-Mail and provide your e-mail address.
1. To elect the following nine individuals nominated to serve as directors of the Company with terms expiring at the next
annual meeting of stockholders.
FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
David J. Aldrich
Kevin L. Beebe
Timothy R. Furey
Liam K. Griffin
Balakrishnan S. Iyer
Christine King
David P. McGlade
Robert A. Schriesheim
Kimberly S. Stevenson
JOHN SMITH
1234 MAIN STREET
APT. 203
NEW YORK, NY 10038
2. To ratify the selection by the Company’s Audit Committee of KPMG LLP as the
independent registered public accounting firm for the Company for fiscal year 2019.
3. To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive
officers, as described in the Company's Proxy Statement.
4. To approve a stockholder proposal regarding supermajority voting provisions.
To change the address on your account, please check the box at right and
indicate your new address in the address space above. Please note that
changes to the registered name(s) on the account may not be submitted via
this method.
I/We will attend the annual meeting.
Signature of Stockholder Date: Signature of Stockholder Date:
Note: Please sign exactly as your name or names appear on this Proxy. When shares are held jointly, each holder should sign. When signing as executor, administrator, attorney, trustee, or guardian, please give full
title as such. If the signer is a corporation, partnership, limited liability company, or other entity, please sign full entity name by duly authorized officer, giving full title as such.
SAMPLE