Quarterlytics / Financial Services / Asset Management / Sprott

Sprott

sii · TSX Financial Services
Claim this profile
Ticker sii
Exchange TSX
Sector Financial Services
Industry Asset Management
Employees 51-200
← All annual reports
FY2010 Annual Report · Sprott
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
Sprott Inc. Annual Report 2010

PRIMED FOR GROWTH

98%

of Sprott’s Equity and Hedge Fund Assets under Management Outperformed their Benchmarks in 2010

Assets under Management

$8.5 Billion

Year-over-Year Change

+$3.7 Billion
+79%

Assets under Administration

Management Fees

Year-over-Year Change

Year-over-Year Change

$3.6 Billion

+$2.5 Billion
+44%

$104 Million

+$16 Million
+18%

Performance Fees

Net Income

Year-over-Year Change

Year-over-Year Change

$200 Million

+$187 Million
+1,441%

$131.2 Million

+$99 Million
+312%

Sprott Inc. Annual Report 2010

11 Funds

Returned in Excess of 30% in 2010

2010 Performance Highlights

Sprott Gold and Precious Minerals Fund, 
Series A

Sprott Canadian Equity Fund,  
Series A

Sprott Small Cap Equity Fund,  
Series A

+74.73%

+57.55%

+50.32%

Sprott Small Cap Hedge Fund 

+50.27%

Sprott Hedge Fund L.P.,  
Class A

+41.22%

Sprott Energy Fund,  
Series A

+32.65%

Please see pages 12 and 13 for complete Fund performance results.
All figures as at December 31, 2010.

1

“With our recent acquistion, we are more diversified by 
product type, client, geography and investment manager.”

$9.2 Billion

Assets under Management*

Products

Mutual Funds

Domestic Hedge Funds

Offshore Funds

Bullion Funds

Direct Management

Managed Accounts

U.S. Limited Partnerships

$ Millions %

3,372

1,739

686

2025

513

389

525

36

19

7

22

6

4

6

Assets under Management  
Able to Earn a Performance Fee*

Assets under Management  
in Captive Pools*

$7.1 Billion 

77% of 
Overall AUM

$2.9 Billion

31% of 
Overall AUM

* Includes Sprott U.S. Holdings Inc. which began operating on February 4, 2011. All figures as at December 31, 2010.

2

Sprott Inc. Annual Report 2010

In 2010, Sprott added 11 new Investment Funds 
and Managed Companies.

$5.3 Billion

Assets under Administration*

Products

Sprott Private Wealth LP

Global Resource Investments Ltd.

$ Billions %

3.6

1.7

68

32

“We are committed to leveraging our existing  
platform to grow our assets and increase the scale  
and shareholder returns of our business.”

3

LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS

Dear Shareholders,

I am delighted to have joined Sprott Inc. (“Sprott”) at such an exciting time and during what proved to be such 
an outstanding year for Sprott and its shareholders. I have closely followed Eric and his team since we worked 
together in the 1990’s and it was remarkable to rejoin and learn firsthand how strong the franchise has become. 
I believe that the unwavering determination to deliver investment performance to our clients, combined with 
a culture of excellence, entrepreneurship and ethical conduct, has provided a foundation that will drive the 
growth of the Company for many years to come.

The past year was fruitful for investors over a wide range of asset classes and strategies, with the S&P/TSX index 
rising by 17.6 % and the DEX Universe Bond index rising by 6.7%. The fuel for this performance was provided 
by governments globally, who successfully averted a series of potential liquidity, banking and economic crises 
through a variety of quantitative easing and stimulus programs. The resulting rebound in economic indicators 
and positive fund flows into the “risk” markets continued throughout the year.

In this environment, our investment team delivered exceptional results to our investors. Driven by our outstanding 
investment  performance  and  strong  inflows  into  new  products  and  managed  companies,  our  Assets  under 
Management (AUM) stood at $8.5 billion – an increase of 79% from December 31, 2009.

On the year, Sprott earned $200 million in performance fees, $202 million in EBITDA and generated total 
revenue of $323 million. Our Board of Directors subsequently approved the payout of a substantial portion of 
the 2010 net performance fees to our shareholders in the form of special dividends totaling $0.72 per share. 
These stellar financial results helped propel Sprott’s share price from $4.50 to $8.06 in 2010. We are pleased 
to report that we have now eliminated almost all of the performance fee deficits that accrued in our Funds in 
2008 and 2009, and our Funds are well positioned to once again generate performance fee revenue in 2011.

When I joined in September 2010, I outlined three key priorities for our business:

1. Stay focused on performance;
2. Leverage our platform;
3. Grow globally.

4

Sprott Inc. Annual Report 2010
Sprott Inc. Annual Report 2010

We have made solid progress in advancing these strategies across the Sprott Group of Companies.

Focus on Performance

Sprott has a team of best-in-class portfolio managers, market strategists, technical experts and analysts that is 
widely-recognized for its investment expertise, unique approach and our performance track record. The basis 
of our approach is to complete detailed macroeconomic analysis with a view to identifying key future trends 
and  opportunities.  Our  investment  team  then  pursues  a  deeper  level  of  knowledge  by  completing  detailed 
“bottom-up” analysis on the universe of securities in each target area, with a view to selecting those with the 
best value and leverage to the market we are targeting. Once an opportunity is identified, we invest decisively 
and with conviction.

Performance has always been the core objective of our firm and in 2010, Sprott Asset Management, (“Sprott”) 
delivered  significant  out-performance  to  our  investors.  On  the  year,  98%  of  our  equity  and  hedge  Funds 
exceeded their benchmark indices – some by a wide margin. The majority of our Funds posted returns of more 
than 30%, of which four Funds delivered returns greater than 50%. This truly exceptional performance speaks 
to the outstanding talent and breadth of our investment management team.

As early as 2000, our research indicated that gold and silver were poised for appreciation and a number of our 
Funds established overweight positions in precious metals stocks and physical bullion. These Funds continued 
to benefit greatly from this conviction, as gold bullion rose by almost 30% during the year and silver bullion 
increased by 83%. We have recently turned our attention to silver as an area of focus and we believe our Funds 
remain well positioned for our outlook for the next years.

Leverage our Platform

We  are  committed  to  leveraging  our  existing  platform  to  grow  our  assets  and  increase  the  scale  and  
shareholder returns of our business. We plan to achieve this by diversifying into new products, entering new 
markets and distribution channels, and developing new businesses where we believe we have a sustainable, 
competitive advantage.

In 2010, we grew our business through the addition of several new revenue platforms including:

•  Our exchange-traded Sprott Physical Bullion Funds
•  The addition of managed companies – Sprott Resource Lending Corp. and Sprott Power Corp.
•  Sprott Fixed Income and Balanced Funds
•  Sprott Flow-Through Funds

5

Consistent with our business model, many of these new growth platforms have been structured as long-term  
or captive capital asset pools and most of them are eligible to earn performance fees.

In  particular,  we  highlight  the  successful  launch  of  our  first  closed-end  funds  listed  on  the  TSX  and  the 
NYSE Arca – the Sprott Physical Gold Trust and the Sprott Physical Silver Trust. Designed to meet rising 
investor demand for physical metals, these two Trusts were major successes, raising a combined $1.7 billion in 
2010. Besides supporting our investment thesis that precious metals will continue to appreciate in value, these 
investment vehicles allow us to expand our client base and increase our brand recognition by offering products 
that are easily accessible to U.S. and international investors.

Several of Sprott’s managed companies should also be highlighted for their growth potential. Sprott Consulting, 
added two new managed companies in 2010. Sprott Consulting has a private-equity like mandate and can 
react to opportunities quickly and utilize multiple channels for fundraising. One of the new businesses is Sprott 
Resource Lending Corp., which offers mezzanine loans to the resource sector and has approximately $250 
million in capital to deploy. The other is Sprott Power Corp., which has a growing portfolio of renewable energy 
projects and currently has a book value of approximately $100 million. As well, Sprott Resource Corp. enjoyed 
another outstanding  year  and  is  poised  to generate significant performance fee revenue through successful 
investments in Orion Energy, Stonegate Agricom, One Earth Farms and a portfolio of other resource prospects 
with a total value at market of approximately $600 million. Sprott Consulting is quickly becoming a valuable 
and substantial business which boasts an enviable record of wealth creation.

Grow Globally

Perhaps  the  most  significant  development  for  2010  was  our  acquisition  of  Global  Resource  Investments, 
Ltd., Terra Resource Investment Management Inc., and Resource Capital Investment Corporation (together 
“Global”), which was completed in February 2011. The acquisition of Global brings us the deep expertise of a 
talented team of resource specialists whom we believe will materially enhance our idea flow and performance 
in the mining, energy and agriculture sectors. Global’s founder Rick Rule, who is internationally renowned 
as a resource investor and has an outstanding long term performance record as a manager, will broaden our 
portfolio management team and has become a major shareholder of Sprott Inc.

The addition of Global added $0.7 billion to our total AUM and $1.7 billion to our Assets under Administration. 
The firm will serve as a platform for the expansion of our investment capabilities into the U.S. market, which 
we believe offers the potential for tremendous growth.

Looking Ahead

Our  company  has  spent  the  past  few  years  investing  heavily  in  building  an  investment  team,  operations, 
systems, marketing and compliance regime, which has positioned us to become one of the global leaders in the 
fragmented alternative asset management industry. The team of experts and management in our organization 
is second to none. We are now in a position to begin to capitalize on these investments and team. With a strong 
balance sheet backed by over $100 million in cash and investments and $50 million in available and undrawn 
credit lines, we have the financial strength to support the development of new products, as well as to consider 
acquisitions of synergistic or new asset management businesses.

6

Sprott Inc. Annual Report 2010

Our outlook for the balance of 2011 is tempered by our concerns about the double-edge sword of a weak 
consumer  and  an  unsustainable  government  finance  situation.  On  the  one  hand,  the  looming  end  of  U.S. 
quantitative easing  programs may well remove the liquor from the punch bowl, leaving sobering investors with 
the headache of more freely floating bond and currency markets. On the other hand, additional money printing 
will eventually lead to hurtful inflation. This is not an environment where we feel comfortable taking risk with 
anything other than “must-have” investments. Many of our investment managers are therefore focused on 
maintaining our precious metal exposure, increasing our silver investments and building appropriate positions 
in the energy, agriculture and infrastructure sectors.

Despite our cautious investment outlook for the year, Sprott is well positioned to continue to deliver excellent 
results for our investors and shareholders. The growth in our AUM and new managed companies, and the 
position of our Funds at or above their performance thresholds, leaves us in a good position to benefit from the 
tremendous upside leverage inherent in our business model.

In closing, as this is my first annual letter to our shareholders, I would like to first thank you for your continued 
support. I would also like to thank Eric Sprott and our entire Board of Directors for their ongoing counsel 
and guidance. We believe we are poised for great things in 2011 and look forward to reporting to you on our 
progress in the quarters to come.

Sincerely,

Peter Grosskopf 
Chief Executive Officer

7

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

Assets under Management

In Billions ($)

Fee Revenue

In Millions ($)

  Management Fees
  Performance Fees

8.5

200.1

6.2

4.8

4.4

4.2

2.9

129.2

86.5

47.9

124

108

13

88

103.7

53

22.5

79.3

05

06

07

08

09

10

05

06

07

08

09

10

Net Income

In Millions ($)

Dividends per Share

131.2

In ($)

  Ordinary 
  Special

52.1

42.3

34.8

31.8

24.8

05

06

07

08

09

10

.15

.075

08

.04

.10

09

.72

.11

10

* All figures as at December 31, 2010.

8

“Performance has always been  
the core objective of our firm and 
in 2010, Sprott Asset Management 
delivered significant out-performance 
for our investors.”

9

KEY ACCOMPLISHMENTS

Performance Highlights

•   98% of Sprott’s equity and hedge fund Assets under Management outperformed their benchmarks in 2010
•  11 Sprott Funds returned in excess of 30% in 2010

10 YR

Since Inception

Top 5 Best Performing Funds

Sprott Gold and Precious Minerals Fund, Series A

S&P/TSX Global Gold Index

Value Added

Sprott Canadian Equity Fund, Series A

S&P/TSX Composite Total Return Index

Value Added

Sprott Small Cap Equity Fund, Series A

S&P/TSX SmallCap Total Return Index

Value Added

Sprott Small Cap Hedge Fund

S&P/TSX SmallCap Total Return Index

Value Added

Sprott Hedge Fund L.P., Class A

S&P 500 (CAD)

Value Added

Awards and Accolades

1 YR

74.7%

25.9%

48.8%

57.6%

17.6%

40.0%

50.3%

35.1%

15.2%

50.3%

35.1%

15.2%

41.2%

7.0%

34.2%

3 YR

23.5%

10.7%

12.8%

6.4%

2.1%

4.3%

7.4%

6.1%

1.3%

9.5%

6.1%

3.4%

11.4%

-4.8%

16.2%

5 YR

19.7%

10.8%

8.9%

13.9%

6.5%

7.4%

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

22.8%

6.6%

16.2%

–

–

–

–

–

–

16.5%

-2.9%

19.4%

23.3%

-4.5%

27.8%

27.2%

13.2%

14.0%

22.3%

7.3%

15.0%

9.3%

5.2%

4.1%

12.9%

4.5%

8.4%

23.7%

-5.4%

29.1%

•   Charles Oliver and Jamie Horvat named as one of the TopGun Canadian Metals & Mining Investment 

Minds, March 2011

•  Eric Sprott has been named the “Top Financial Visionary in Canada” by Advisor.ca, March 2011
•  Sprott Capital L.P., named Hedge Fund of the Year at the 2010 AR Awards, November 2010
•   Kevin Bambrough, CEO Sprott Resource Corp., named as Top Pick by Casey’s Next Ten Top 10 Rising 

Stars in the Natural Resource Sector, October 2010

•   Sprott Gold and Precious Minerals Fund – Thomson Reuters Lipper Award “Best Fund Over One Year, 

Precious Metals Equity Category”, February 2010

10

Sprott Inc. Annual Report 2010

Acquisitions

•   Acquired Global Resource Investments Ltd., Terra Resource Investment Management Inc. and Resource 

Capital Investments Inc., February 2011

•  Added $715 Million in Assets under Management and $1.7 Billion in Assets under Administration

Strengthening Our Team

•  Peter Grosskopf joins as CEO of Sprott Inc.
•  Portfolio Manager Rick Rule joins Sprott’s Investment Team and Executive Committee
•  Promoted Eric Nutall to Lead Portfolio Manager on Sprott Energy Fund
•  Hired Portfolio Managers Scott Colbourne and Michael Craig to manage Fixed Income Funds
•  Hired John Ciampaglia as COO of Sprott Asset Management LP
•  Developed management teams for Sprott Resource Lending Corp.** and Sprott Power Corp.**
•  Hired Portfolio Manager Paul Wong, specialist in natural resource investing and capital markets research
•  Appointed David Franklin as CEO of Sprott Private Wealth

New Products and Managed Companies

March 
2010

June 
2010

September 
2010

March 
2011

February 
2010

May 
2010

August 
2010

November 
2010

Sprott 2010 
Flow-Through LP

Sprott Private 
Credit Fund LP

Sprott Physical 
Gold Trust

Sprott Power 
Corp.

Sprott Tactical 
Balanced Fund*

Sprott Resource 
Lending Corp.**

Sprott Physical 
Silver Trust

Sprott 2011 
Flow-Through LP

Sprott 
Absolute 
Return Income 
Fund

Sprott 
Diversified 
Yield Fund 

Sprott Short 
Term Bond 
Fund

*  On November 30, 2010, Sprott Asset Management LP received unitholder approval for changes to Sprott Multi-Manager Fund.
**  Sprott Resource Lending Corp. (TSX:SIL) (NYSE AMEX: SILU) and Sprott Power Corp. (TSX: SPZ) are managed by Sprott Consulting LP,  

an affiliate of Sprott Inc. Neither company is an affiliate of Sprott Inc.

11

PERFORMANCE SUMMARY

Performance as of December 31, 2010

SPROTT MUTUAL FUNDS

Equity Focused

Sprott Canadian Equity Fund, Series A (1997)

Sprott Gold & Precious Minerals Fund, Series A (2001)  

Sprott Energy Fund, Series A (2004)

Sprott Growth Fund, Series A (2006)

Sprott Small Cap Equity Fund, Series A (2007)

Sprott All Cap Fund, Series A (2008)

Sprott Tactical Balanced Fund, Series A (2009)
(formerly Sprott Multi-Manager Fund)

Bullion Focused

Sprott Gold Bullion Fund, Series A (2009)

Fixed Income Focused

Sprott Diversified Yield Fund, Series A (2010) 1

Sprott Short-Term Bond Fund, Series A (2010) 1

SPROTT HEDGE FUNDS

Long/Short Equity Focused

Sprott Hedge Fund L.P., Class A (2000)2

Sprott Hedge Fund L.P. II, Class A (2002)

Sprott Bull/Bear RSP Fund, Class A (2002)

Sprott Opportunities Hedge Fund L.P., Class A (2004)

Sprott Opportunities RSP Fund, Class A (2005)

Sprott Small Cap Hedge Fund (2007)

Asset Based Lending Strategy

Sprott Private Credit Fund L.P., Class A, Series 1 (2010)

Fixed Income Focused

Sprott Absolute Return Income Fund, Class A (2010) 

1 YR

3 YR

5 YR

10 YR

Inception

(Net of all fees)

57.6%

74.7%

32.6%

15.2%

50.3%

30.8%

27.8%

21.4%

-

-

41.2%

38.4%

36.9%

7.7%

7.6%

50.3%

-

-

6.4%

23.5%

-6.0%

-12.6%

7.4%

-

-

-

-

-

11.4%

13.4%

14.1%

4.8%

4.6%

9.5%

-

-

13.9%

19.7%

0.7%

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

16.5%

17.0%

17.8%

9.4%

9.3%

-

-

-

22.8%

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

23.3%

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

22.3%

27.2%

12.3%

1.8%

9.3%

17.0%

31.6%

11.5%

-

-

(Net of all fees)

23.7%

12.2%

15.0%

17.7%

9.8%

12.9%

9.4%

3.5%

Notes

Please note that all periods greater than 12 months are annualized.
1  In accordance with NI 81-102, we will not publish returns for this fund until it is one-year old.
2  The Sprott Hedge Fund L.P. is closed to new investments, please refer to the Sprott Hedge Fund L.P. II.

12

Sprott Inc. Annual Report 2010

OFFSHORE FUNDS

Sprott Offshore Ltd. (2002)

Sprott Capital L.P. (2002)

Sprott Offshore II Ltd. (2007)

Sprott Capital II L.P. (2008)

Sprott Opportunities Offshore Ltd. (2006)* 

Sprott Opportunities Capital L.P. (2006)*

INDICES

S&P/TSX Composite Total Return Index

S&P/TSX Global Gold Index

S&P/TSX Capped Energy Total Return Index

S&P 500 Index (CAD)

S&P 500 Index (USD)

Dow Jones Industrial Average

NASDAQ Composite Index

S&P/TSX SmallCap Total Return Index

MSCI World Index (CAD)

BofA Merrill Lynch US High Yield Index

DEX Universe Bond Index

1 YR

3 YR

5 YR

10 YR

Inception

(Net of all fees)

24.9%

24.7%

19.1%

16.0%

6.6%

6.1%

48.2%

48.1%

45.5%

45.3%

0.4%

-1.5%

1 YR 

17.6%

25.9%

11.7%

7.0%

12.8%

11.0%

16.9%

35.1%

6.0%

15.2%

6.7%

15.7%

15.7%

16.6%

16.0%

2.1%

1.3%

3 YR

2.1%

10.7%

0.5%

-4.8%

-5.0%

-4.4%

0.0%

6.1%

-4.7%

10.1%

6.2%

22.6%

22.6%

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

5 YR

6.5%

10.8%

3.3%

-2.9%

0.1%

1.6%

3.8%

6.1%

-0.7%

8.8%

5.3%

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

10 YR

6.6%

-

-

-4.5%

-0.5%

0.7%

0.7%

-

-1.8%

8.6%

6.3%

Notes

* Fund terminated on December 31, 2010.

13

THE SPROTT GROUP OF COMPANIES
Companies at a Glance

Relentless Pursuit of Performance

Our mission is to deliver outstanding performance results for our investors  
over the long-term.

With  a  history  going  back  to  1981,  Sprott  Inc.  offers  a  collection  of  investment  managers,  united  by  one 
common goal; delivering superior long-term returns to our investors. Sprott has a team of Best-in-Class portfolio 
managers, market strategists, technical experts and analysts that is widely-recognized for its investment expertise, 
performance results and unique investment approach. Our Investment Team relentlessly pursues a deeper level 
of knowledge and understanding which allows it to develop unique macroeconomic and company insights.

Our team-based approach allows us to uncover the most attractive investment opportunities for our investors. 
When an emerging investment opportunity is identified, we invest decisively and with conviction. We also co-
invest our own capital to align our interests with our investors. Our history of outperformance speaks for itself. 

Sprott Asset Management LP is the investment manager of the Sprott family of mutual funds, hedge funds 
and discretionary managed accounts. Sprott Asset Management offers a Best-in-Class Investment Team led 
by Eric Sprott, world renowned money manager. The firm manages diverse mandates united by the same 
goal: delivering superior long-term returns to investors. Our team of  investment professionals employs an 
opportunistic, high conviction and team-based approach, focusing on undervalued securities with the greatest 
return potential. 

For more information, please visit www.sprott.com

14

Sprott Inc. Annual Report 2010

Sprott Private Wealth LP provides customized wealth management to Canadian high-net worth investors, 
including entrepreneurs, professionals, family trusts, foundations, and estates. We are dedicated to serving our 
clients through relationships based on integrity and mutual trust. 

For more information, please visit www.sprottwealth.com

Sprott Consulting LP provides active management services to independent public and private companies 
and partnerships to capitalize on unique business opportunities. The firm offers deep bench strength with a 
highly-talented and knowledgeable team of professionals who have extensive experience and a proven ability 
to design creative solutions that lead to market-beating value improvement. The firm has management services 
agreements with Sprott Resource Corp., Sprott Resource Lending Corp., and Sprott Power Corp.

For more information, please visit www.sprottconsulting.com

Sprott  U.S.  Holdings  Inc.  offers  specialized  brokerage  services  and  asset  management  in  the  natural 
resource sector. Global Resource Investments Ltd., our full-service U.S. brokerage firm, specializes in natural 
resource investments in the United States, Canada and Australia.

Founded in 1993, the firm is led by Rick Rule, a leading authority on investing in global natural resource 
companies.  More  than  just  brokers,  the  team  is  comprised  of  geologists,  mining  engineers,  scientists  and 
investment professionals. 

For more information, please visit www.gril.net

15

THE SPROTT GROUP

16

Sprott Inc. Annual Report 2010

OF COMPANIES

17

TABLE OF CONTENTS

19  Management’s Discussion and Analysis

38  Management’s Responsibility for Financial Reporting

39 

40 

43 

57 

Auditors’ Report

Consolidated Financial Statements

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Corporate Information

18

 
 
 
 
 
 
Sprott Inc. Annual Report 2010
Sprott Inc. Annual Report 2010

MANAGEMENT’S  DISCUSSION &  ANALYSIS

This Management’s Discussion & Analysis (‘‘MD&A’’) of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations presents an
analysis of the financial condition of Sprott Inc.
(the ‘‘Company’’) and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010
compared with December 31, 2009. The Board of Directors
approved this MD&A on March 22, 2011.

The Company was incorporated under the Business
Corporations Act (Ontario) on February 13, 2008. The
Company was incorporated to acquire, through an exchange
of shares, all of the shares of Sprott Asset Management Inc.
(‘‘SAMI’’). On May 8, 2008, the Company filed a prospectus
in each of the provinces and territories of Canada in respect of
an initial public offering of 20,000,000 common shares to be
effected via a secondary offering by certain shareholders of
the Company.

This MD&A should be read in conjunction with the

accompanying audited consolidated financial statements for
the years ended December, 2010 and 2009 and the
notes thereto.

The audited consolidated financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted
accounting principles (‘‘GAAP’’) requiring estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities as at the date of these statements and the amounts of
revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual
results could differ from those estimates as a result of various
factors.

Forward Looking Statements
This MD&A contains ‘‘forward looking statements’’ which
reflect the current expectations of management regarding our
future growth, results of operations, performance and business
prospects and opportunities. Wherever possible, words such as
‘‘may’’, ‘‘would’’, ‘‘could’’, ‘‘will’’, ‘‘anticipate’’, ‘‘believe’’,
‘‘plan’’, ‘‘expect’’, ‘‘intend’’, ‘‘estimate’’, ‘‘aim’’, ‘‘endeavour’’
and similar expressions have been used to identify these
forward looking statements. These statements reflect our
current beliefs with respect to future events and are based on
information currently available to us. Forward looking
statements involve significant known and unknown risks,
uncertainties and assumptions. Many factors could cause our
actual results, performance or achievements to be materially
different from any future results, performance or achievements
that may be expressed or implied by such forward looking
statements including, without limitation, those listed in the
‘‘Risk Factors’’ section of the Company’s annual information
form dated March 22, 2011 (the ‘‘AIF’’). Should one or more
of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should
assumptions underlying the forward looking statements prove

incorrect, actual results, performance or achievements could
vary materially from those expressed or implied by the
forward looking statements contained in this MD&A. These
forward looking statements are made as of March 22, 2011
and will not be updated or revised except as required by
applicable securities law.

Key Performance Indicators (Non-GAAP Financial
Measures)
We measure the success of our business using a number of key
performance indicators that are not measurements in
accordance with GAAP and should not be considered as an
alternative to net income or any other measure of performance
under GAAP. Non-GAAP financial measures do not have a
standardized meaning prescribed by GAAP and are therefore
unlikely to be comparable to similar measures presented by
other issuers.

Our key performance indicators include:

Assets Under Management
Assets Under Management or AUM refers to the total net
assets of our public mutual funds, hedge funds, offshore funds
and bullion funds (the ‘‘Funds’’), managed accounts
(‘‘Managed Accounts’’), which include the accounts managed
by Sprott Asset Management LP and managed companies
(‘‘Managed Companies’’) managed by Sprott Consulting LP on
which management fees (‘‘Management Fees’’) or performance
fees (‘‘Performance Fees’’) are calculated. We believe that AUM
is an important measure as we earn Management Fees,
calculated as a percentage of AUM, and may earn Performance
Fees, calculated as a percentage of: (i) our Funds’, Managed
Accounts’ and Managed Companies’ excess performance over
the relevant benchmark; (ii) the increase in net asset values of
our Funds over a predetermined hurdle, if any; or (iii) the net
profit in our Funds over the performance period. We monitor
the level of our AUM because they drive our level of
Management Fees. The amount of Performance Fees we earn is
related to both our investment performance and our AUM.

Investment Performance (Market Value Appreciation
(Depreciation) of Investment Portfolios)
Investment performance is a key driver of AUM. Our
investment track record through varying economic conditions
and market cycles has been and will continue to be an
important factor in our success. Growth in AUM resulting
from positive investment performance increases the value of
the assets that we manage for our clients and we, in turn,
benefit from higher fees. Alternatively, poor absolute and/or
relative investment performance will likely lead to a reduction
in our AUM and, hence, our fee revenue.

19
1

Net Sales
AUM fluctuates due to a combination of investment
performance and net sales (gross sales net of redemptions). Net
sales, together with investment performance determine the
level of AUM which, as discussed above, is the basis on which
Management Fees are charged and to which Performance Fees
may be applied.

EBITDA
Our method of calculating EBITDA is defined as earnings
before interest expense, income taxes, amortization of
property and equipment, amortization of deferred sales
charges, amortization of intangible assets and stock-based
non-cash compensation. We believe that this is an important
measure as it allows us to assess our ongoing business without
the impact of interest expense, income taxes, amortization and
non-cash compensation, and is an indicator of our ability to
pay dividends, invest in our business and continue operations.
EBITDA is a measure commonly used in the industry by
management, investors and investment analysts in
understanding and comparing results by factoring out the
impact of different financing methods, capital structures, the
amortization of deferred sales charges and income tax rates
between companies in the same industry. While each company
may not utilize the same method of calculating EBITDA as we
do, we believe it enables a better comparison of the underlying
operations of comparable companies and we believe that it is
an important measure in assessing our ongoing business
operations.

Base EBITDA
Base EBITDA refers to EBITDA after adjusting for: (i) the
exclusion of any gains (losses) on our proprietary investments
including our initial contributions to our Funds on their
inception, as if such gains (losses) had not been incurred and
(ii) Performance Fees, Performance Fee related compensation
and other Performance Fee related expenses. With the
exception of Performance Fees attributable to redeemed units
(termed as ‘‘Crystallized Performance Fees’’), Performance Fees
are earned on the last day of the fiscal year. Performance Fees
are not as predictable and stable as Management Fees and
therefore Base EBITDA enables us to evaluate the day-to-day
results of operations throughout the year and is meaningful for
the same reason.

This measure also allows us to assess our ongoing business
operations, with adjustments for non-recurring items as well as
items that are not related to our core operations, such as

income or losses relating to our investment in proprietary
investments.

Cash Flow from Operations
Our method of calculating cash flow from operations is
defined as cash provided by operating activities adjusted for
the impact of the net change in non-cash balances relating
to operations.

This is a relevant measure in the investment management
business since it represents cash available for distribution to
our shareholders and for general corporate purposes.

We believe that these Key Performance Indicators are
important for a more meaningful presentation of our results
of operations.

Overview
In 2010, the Company operated through three wholly-owned
subsidiaries, Sprott Asset Management LP (‘‘SAM LP’’), Sprott
Private Wealth LP (‘‘SPW LP’’) and Sprott Consulting LP
(‘‘SCLP’’). Through these three partnerships, the Company is
an independent asset management company dedicated to
achieving superior returns for our clients over the long term.
Our business model is based foremost on delivering excellence
in investment management services to our clients.

On June 1, 2009 we completed a corporate reorganization
of SAMI whereby SAMI was dissolved and its operations were
separated into three business lines: discretionary portfolio
management by SAM LP, broker-dealer services by SPW LP,
and consulting services by SCLP. The reorganization had no
impact on the consolidated financial statements. SAM LP is
registered with the Ontario Securities Commission (‘‘OSC’’) as
a portfolio manager (‘‘PM’’) and exempt market dealer
(‘‘EMD’’). SPW LP is an investment dealer and a member of
the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada
(‘‘IIROC’’). SCLP provides active management, consulting and
administrative services to other companies. Currently SCLP
provides these services to Sprott Resource Corp., Sprott
Resource Lending Corp. (‘‘SRLC’’) and Sprott Power
Corp. (‘‘SPC’’).

On February 4, 2011 we completed the acquisition of the
Global Companies. The Global Companies consist of Rule
Investments, Inc., Global Resource Investments, Ltd., Terra
Resource Investment Management, Inc. and Resource Capital
Investment Corporation. The Global Companies are based in
Carlsbad, California. Effective February 4, 2011, the accounts
of the Global Companies will be consolidated with those of
the Company and will be reported on beginning with the
Company’s first quarter 2011 report.

220

Sprott Inc. Annual Report 2010
Sprott Inc. Annual Report 2010

Currently, the majority of the Company’s revenues are

Managed Companies. As at December 31, 2010, we managed
approximately $8.5 billion in assets among our various Funds,
Managed Accounts and Managed Companies.

Management Fees are less variable and more predictable
than Performance Fees. Management Fees are generally closely
correlated with changes in AUM. However, the rate of change
in our Management Fees may not exactly mirror the rate of
change in our AUM, primarily a result of two factors. First,

earned through SAM LP in the form of Management Fees and
Performance Fees earned through the management of the
Funds and Managed Accounts; SPW LP earns most of its
revenues via intercompany trailer fee payments from SAM LP
(these intercompany fees are eliminated on consolidation) and
from commissions earned on new and follow-on offerings of
Funds managed by SAM LP and through various private
placements. SPW LP provides us with a competitive advantage multi-series or multi-class structures are offered in some of our
by providing a unique distribution channel for our Fund
products and other investment opportunities that we are able
to make available to our private clients; as well, it serves as a
platform to brand and grow our wealth management business.
SCLP earns the majority of its revenues through the
management of its Managed Companies in the form of
Management Fees and Performance Fees. SCLP enables us to
benefit from our expertise in managing other companies, both
public and private. SCLP provides us with a competitive
advantage by providing SPW LP clients access to merchant
banking and private equity-style investments.

Funds whereby the Management Fee differs among the
applicable series or classes. Second, mutual Funds have the
highest rate of Management Fees, followed by hedge Funds
and offshore Funds, while bullion Funds have the lowest rate
of Management Fees. Fees for managing the various Managed
Accounts and Managed Companies are negotiated on a case
by case basis. Therefore, the weighting of AUM among our
various Funds, Managed Accounts and Managed Companies
impacts Management Fees as a percentage of AUM.

Commission income is specific to SPW LP and is generated

While we have operated through three principal operating
companies, all three are focused on growing the AUM of the
Funds, Managed Accounts and Managed Companies that we
manage for the benefit of the unitholders, shareholders and
partners of those entities and thus for the benefit of our
shareholders.

from the sale of new and follow-on offerings of products or
companies managed by SAM LP or SCLP and through private
placements of unrelated companies to clients of SPW LP. This
income is less predictable in nature and is generally negotiated
on a case by case basis. Commissions income is recorded in the
financial statements in the month in which the service
is rendered.

Performance Fees are determined as of December 31 each
The most significant factor that drives our business results
year. However, Performance Fees are accrued in the relevant
continues to be the performance of the assets that we manage.
Funds, Managed Accounts and Managed Companies, as
Absolute returns generate growth in AUM, and hence
applicable, to properly reflect the Performance Fee that would
Management Fees while absolute and/or relative returns may
result in the receipt of Performance Fees. While there are many
be payable, if any, based on the Net Asset Value of that Fund,
factors that influence sales and redemptions of our Funds and Managed Account or Managed Company. Where an investor
Managed Accounts such as general investor sentiment towards
certain asset classes and the global economic environment,
past investment returns play an important part in an
investment decision to buy, hold or sell a particular investment
product.

The Company derives revenue primarily from Management

Fees earned from the management of our Funds, Managed
Accounts and Managed Companies and from Performance
Fees earned from the investment of the AUM of our Funds,
Managed Accounts and Managed Companies. Our
Management Fees are calculated as a percentage of AUM. Our
Performance Fees are calculated as a percentage of the return
earned by our Funds, Managed Accounts and Managed
Companies. Accordingly, the growth in our fees is based on
both the growth in AUM and the absolute or relative return, as
applicable, earned by our Funds, Managed Accounts and

redeems a domestic hedge Fund or an offshore Fund, any
Performance Fee attributable to those units redeemed is paid
to SAM LP as manager of the Funds. These Crystallized
Performance Fees, as well as the related allocation to the
employee bonus pool, are accrued for in the financial
statements of SAM LP for the appropriate month. At SCLP,
Performance Fees are generated from time-to-time and are
usually based on monetizing events at the Managed
Companies. These Performance Fees can be significant
when realized.

Our most significant expenses include compensation and
benefits and trailer fees. With respect to compensation and
benefits, employees are paid a base salary and may be eligible
to share in a bonus pool, with the size of such discretionary
bonuses being tied to both individual performance and the
overall financial performance of the Company. Trailer fees are

21
3

products, and by leveraging the Company’s products and
brands in the United States and internationally.

Effective February 4, 2011, the accounts of the Global
Companies will be consolidated with those of the Company
and will be reported on beginning with the Company’s first
quarter 2011 report. The Global Companies are experts in the
natural resource investing sector providing both investment

paid to dealers that distribute units of a Fund. Such dealers
may receive a trailer fee (annualized but paid monthly or
quarterly) of up to 1% of the value of the assets held in the
respective Fund by the dealer’s clients. Both the employee
bonus pool component of compensation and trailer fees are
correlated with Management Fees whereas only the employee
bonus pool component of compensation is correlated with
Performance Fees. Changes in levels of trailer fees are generally management and specialized broker services. The Global
a reflection of changes in domestic Fund sales through the
advisor and dealer channel as well as changes in
Management Fees.

Companies are led by Rick Rule, a highly respected natural
resources investor with over 35 years of experience in the
investment industry, and have developed a highly specialized
team of resource investing experts, including geologists and
In 2009 we introduced a low load sales charge option for
mining engineers. They offer their expertise through pooled
some of our Funds. The commissions for these sales have been
investment vehicles, managed accounts and brokerage
financed from internal cash flow and have totaled
accounts and have delivered strong investment performance to
approximately $1.0 million since late 2009. Other expenses
incurred by our business are general and administration costs,
their clients. The Global Companies are based in Carlsbad,
including sales and marketing costs, occupancy, regulatory and California but invest globally. Together, as at December 31,
professional fees as well as charitable donations and
amortization.

2010, the Global Companies administered approximately
US $1.7 billion and managed approximately US $0.7 billion in
client assets across three business lines.

Business Highlights and Growth Initiatives
2010 was an extremely active year as we executed on various
growth and development initiatives across the organization.

Acquisition of the Global Companies
On September 22, 2010, the Company announced the signing
of a non-binding letter of intent (‘‘LOI’’) reflecting an
agreement in principle to acquire all of the outstanding stock
of Rule Investments Inc. (the owner of Global Resource
Investments Ltd.), Terra Resource Investment
Management Inc. and Resource Capital Investments Corp.
(collectively, the ‘‘Global Companies’’). On February 4, 2011,
the Company completed the acquisition.

As consideration, the Company issued 19,467,500 common
shares from treasury valued at $168.8 million, excluding costs.
The common shares of the Company issued as consideration
were valued at $8.67 per share using the closing price of the
Company’s common shares on February 4, 2011. An
additional 532,500 common shares of the Company will be
provided to employees of the Global Companies during 2011.
In addition, the seller and certain current and future employees
of the Global Companies will be eligible to earn up to an
additional 8 million common shares of the Company with the
achievement of certain financial targets by the Global
Companies over a period of up to five years.

The acquisition is expected to provide benefits across the

Company, including the Global Companies through the
sharing of intellectual capital, the development of new

422

Hiring and Retention of Top Talent
On September 7, 2010, Peter Grosskopf joined the Company
as Chief Executive Officer, succeeding Eric Sprott in that role.
Mr. Sprott assumed the position of Chairman of Sprott Inc.
and Chief Investment Officer (‘‘CIO’’) of SAM LP. While
Mr. Grosskopf will be responsible for developing and
implementing the overall strategy for the Company, this
change allows Mr. Sprott to further focus on his role as CIO of
SAM LP and portfolio manager for a number of our
investment funds – investment performance continues to be a
key priority for our business.

In recognition of Mr. Grosskopf’s past accomplishments in
the financial services industry and to acknowledge the future
contributions of Mr. Grosskopf and Mr. Bambrough, the
Company’s President, Mr. Sprott personally agreed to fund a
share incentive program through his personal holding
company (‘‘Holdco’’). The program provided Mr. Grosskopf
with 5 million common shares of the Company held by
Holdco and Mr. Bambrough with 3 million common shares of
the Company. With this transfer of 8 million common shares
of the Company, Holdco’s ownership stake was reduced by
approximately 8%. The program was finalized at the end of
2010 and did not result in the issuance of any shares from
treasury by the Company. For accounting purposes, the
program resulted in a one-time non-cash charge of
$25.7 million to earnings.

Sprott Inc. Annual Report 2010
Sprott Inc. Annual Report 2010

Product and Business Line Expansion
We continue to add products to better serve our clients and to
take advantage of those opportunities that we have identified
to generate returns to add value for our shareholders
over time.

In March 2010, we completed the initial public offering of

the Sprott Physical Gold Trust and in June 2010 and in
September 2010 completed follow-on offerings of trust units,
raising gross proceeds aggregating in excess of US$1.0 billion.
In January 2010, we launched our first flow-through fund,

the Sprott 2010 Flow-Through Limited Partnership and in
March 2010, a follow-on offering was completed, raising
gross proceeds of $51 million in total.

In May 2010, we launched Sprott Private Credit Fund LP, an

open-ended limited partnership for accredited investors.
In June 2010, a subsidiary of SCLP entered into a

management services agreement with SPC after its initial
capital raise of approximately $20 million. SPC is dedicated
and committed to the development and financing of renewable
energy projects.

In August 2010, we launched a suite of Fixed Income Funds
comprised of Sprott Short-Term Bond Fund, Sprott Diversified
Yield Fund and Sprott Absolute Return Income Fund.

In September 2010, a subsidiary of SCLP entered into a
management services agreement with SRLC (formerly Quest
Capital Corp.) (TSX:QC). SRLC completed a private
placement of $25 million (the ‘‘Private Placement’’) and
SPW LP acted as sole agent to SRLC on that Private
Placement. The Company invested $14.4 million in the Private
Placement and now owns 8,977,654 common shares of SRLC
(or 5.8% of the outstanding shares). The balance of the Private
Placement was purchased by SPW LP clients and employees of
the Company and its affiliates. SRLC is executing on its plan
to monetize its net real estate loans to generate additional
resource lending assets in relation to which the subsidiary of
SCLP may earn Management Fees and Performance Fees.

In October 2010, we launched Sprott Physical Silver Trust,

raising gross proceeds of US$575 million.

In February 2011, SPC became a publicly listed company on
the TSX after completing a merger with First Asset PowerGen
Fund on January 31, 2011. On February 8, 2011, SPC
acquired 100% of the shares of Sky Generation Inc. These
transactions should generate additional development and
financing opportunities of renewable energy projects from
which the subsidiary of SCLP may earn Management Fees and
Performance Fees.

In February 2011, we launched Sprott 2011 Flow-Through

Limited Partnership, raising gross proceeds in excess of
$90 million.

SPW LP provides an important distribution channel for our
Funds’ offerings and other investment opportunities. SPW LP
has offered its clients the opportunity to participate in certain
private placements including SPC and SRLC. Clients may also
have the opportunity to participate in private placements by
unrelated listed companies. Such offerings have the potential
to add additional AUM or AUA within the group and SPW LP
will usually receive selling commissions in respect of certain
sales of these offerings.

The addition of these products, business lines and the
acquisition of the Global Companies has required, and will
require, us to make investments in technology, infrastructure
and resources in order to continue to be able to provide
effective and efficient service to our clients and to the Funds,
Managed Accounts and Managed Companies that we manage.
We have leased additional space contiguous to our existing
premises in Toronto to accommodate the expansion of our
various businesses and, with our acquisition of the Global
Companies, maintain premises in Carlsbad, California.

Financial Highlights
Financial highlights for the year ended December 31, 2010 are:
• AUM at December 31, 2010 were $8.5 billion. This reflects
an increase of $3.8 billion (79.0%) from $4.8 billion at
December 31, 2009. Average AUM for 2010 was
$5.9 billion compared to $4.5 billion in 2009, an increase of
30.7%. During the year ended December 31, 2010, market
values increased by $2.3 billion, and together with positive
net subscriptions of $1.5 billion, AUM increased by
$3.8 billion.

• Management Fees for the year ended December 31, 2010

were $103.7 million, representing an increase of
$15.7 million (17.8%) over the prior year.

• Performance Fees for the year ended December 31, 2010 of
$200.1 million were $187.1 million or 1,441.1% higher
than 2009.

• Base EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2010 was
$43.4 million representing an increase of $9.7 million or
28.8% compared with 2009.

• EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2010 was
$202.0 million or $153.5 million (316.8%) higher
than 2009.

• Cash flow from operations for the year ended December 31,
2010 was $151.6 million ($1.01 per share) representing an

23
5

increase of $120.9 million (393.8%) from $30.7 million
($0.20 per share) for the year ended December 31, 2009.
• Net income for the year ended December 31, 2010 increased
by 312.3% to $131.2 million, and represents earnings per

share, on a basic and diluted basis, of $0.87. Net income for
the year ended December 31, 2009 was $31.8 million,
representing earnings per share, on a basic and diluted basis
of $0.21.

Selected Annual Financial Information

As  at  December 31  (In $ 000’s,  except  per  share  amounts)

2010

2009

2008

7
Selected Key Performance Indicators
Assets Under Management

Net Sales (Redemptions)

EBITDA

Base EBITDA

Cash Flow from Operations

EBITDA Per Share – basic and fully diluted

Base EBITDA Per Share – basic and fully diluted

Cash Flow From Operations Per Share – basic and fully diluted

Balance Sheet Information
Total Assets

Total Liabilities

Shareholders’ Equity

Income Statement Information
Total Revenue

Net Income

Net Earnings Per Share – basic

Net Earnings Per Share – fully diluted

Summary Financial Information
Summary Balance Sheet

8,545,276

1,448,419

201,961

43,384

151,605

1.35

0.29

1.01

342,037

128,414

213,623

323,025

131,232

0.87

0.87

4,773,789

4,448,708

(571,153)

48,450

33,682

30,683

0.32

0.22

0.20

97,694

21,554

76,140

107,525

31,830

0.21

0.21

95,236

81,310

57,091

50,533

0.56

0.39

0.35

123,430

43,916

79,514

165,757

52,136

0.36

0.36

(In $ 000’s,  except  per  share  amounts)

December 31,  2010

December 31,  2009

342,037

128,414

213,623

97,694

21,554

76,140

Total Assets

Total Liabilities

Shareholders’ Equity

624

Sprott Inc. Annual Report 2010
Sprott Inc. Annual Report 2010

For  the  year  ended
December 31,  2010

For  the  year  ended
December 31,  2009

103,686

200,054

8,537

6,211

4,537

88,023

12,981

5,032

80

1,409

323,025

107,525

83,664

28,001

21,649

13,369

2,382

933

149,998

173,027

41,795

131,232

28,934

41,795

201,961

27,998

2,296

19,191

10,743

1,143

992

62,363

45,162

13,332

31,830

3,288

13,332

48,450

Summary Income Statement and Reconciliation to EBITDA and Base EBITDA

(In $ 000’s,  except  per  share  amounts)

Revenue

Management fees

Performance fees

Unrealized and realized gains on proprietary investments

Commissions

Other income

Total revenue

Expenses

Compensation and benefits

Stock-based compensation

Trailer fees

General and administrative

Donations

Amortization

Total expenses

Income before income taxes

Provision for income taxes

Net income and comprehensive income

Other expenses 1

Provision for income taxes

EBITDA

Unrealized and realized gains on proprietary investments

(8,537)

(5,032)

Performance fees net of performance fee related compensation and other performance
fee related expenses 2

Base EBITDA

Base EBITDA Per Share – basic and fully diluted

EBITDA Per Share – basic and fully diluted

Net Earnings Per Share – basic

Net Earnings Per Share – fully diluted

(150,040)

43,384

0.29

1.35

0.87

0.87

(9,736)

33,682

0.22

0.32

0.21

0.21

1

2

Includes amortization of property and equipment, amortization of deferred sales charges and non-cash stock-based compensation expense.

Performance Fee related compensation is equal to 25% of Performance Fee revenue.

25
7

Summary Cash Flow Statements and Reconciliation to Cash Flow from Operations

(In $ 000’s,  except  per  share  amounts)

Operating activities

Net income for the year

Non-cash items

Cash flow from operations

Non-cash balances relating to operations

Cash provided by operating activities

Cash used in investing activities

Cash used in financing activities

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents during the year

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the year

Cash and cash equivalents, end of the year

Cash Flow From Operations Per Share – basic

Cash Flow From Operations Per Share – fully diluted

For  the  year  ended
December 31,  2010

For  the  year  ended
December 31,  2009

131,232

20,373

151,605

(90,520)

61,085

(7,136)

(21,750)

32,199

49,010

81,209

1.01

1.01

31,830

(1,147)

30,683

(23,496)

7,187

(10,565)

(37,500)

(40,878)

89,888

49,010

0.20

0.20

Results of Operations
Year ended December 31, 2010 compared to year ended
December 31, 2009

Overall Performance
AUM increased to $8.5 billion at December 31, 2010
compared with $4.8 billion at December 31, 2009. Net sales
for the year ended December 31, 2010 were $1.5 billion and
combined with market value appreciation of $2.3 billion
resulted in a $3.8 billion increase in AUM for the year.
Monthly average AUM for the year ended December 31, 2010
was $5.9 billion compared with $4.5 billion in 2009, an
increase of 30.7%.

Total revenues increased by $215.5 million or 200.4% from

$107.5 million in the year ended December 31, 2009 to
$323.0 million in the year ended December 31, 2010.
Management fees for the year ended December 31, 2010 were
$103.7 million, representing an increase of $15.7 million

(17.8%) over the comparative year ended December 31, 2009.
Performance fees were $187.1 million higher for the year
ended December 31, 2010 when compared to the prior year.
Unrealized and realized gains on proprietary investments were
$3.5 million higher for the year ended December 31, 2010
when compared to the prior year. Selling commissions
increased significantly to $6.2 million in 2010 when compared
to $0.1 million in 2009. Other income increased by
$3.1 million to $4.5 million in 2010, when compared to 2009.

Expenses totaled $150.0 million for the year ended

December 31, 2010, which is an increase of $87.6 million or
140.5% from $62.4 million in the year ended
December 31, 2009.

Net income of $131.2 million for the year ended

December 31, 2010 increased by $99.4 million or 312.3%
when compared with net income of $31.8 million for the year
ended December 31, 2009.

826

Sprott Inc. Annual Report 2010
Sprott Inc. Annual Report 2010

Assets Under Management, Investment Performance and Net Sales
The breakdown of AUM by investment product type as at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was as follows:

Product  Type

Mutual Funds

Bullion Funds

Domestic Hedge Funds

Offshore Funds

Managed Companies

Managed Accounts

Total

The table below summarizes the changes in AUM for the

relevant periods.

($ millions)

AUM, beginning of year

Net sales (redemptions)

Market value appreciation
of portfolios

AUM, end of year

Year  ended
December 31,
2010

Year  ended
December 31,
2009

4,774

1,448

2,323

8,545

4,449

(571)

896

4,774

Performance of our Funds, Managed Accounts and

Managed Companies for the year ended December 31, 2010
resulted in AUM increasing by $2.3 billion or 48.7% of
opening AUM. All but the smallest of our Funds, Managed
Accounts and Managed Companies generated positive
performance. Most of our Funds, Managed Accounts and
Managed Companies posted strong performance results on
both an absolute and on a relative basis for the year ended
December 31, 2010.

Net sales for the year ended December 31, 2010 were

$1.5 billion. The launch of Sprott Physical Gold Trust, Sprott
Physical Silver Trust, Sprott 2010 Flow-Through LP, Sprott
Private Credit Fund LP and our Fixed Income Funds added
approximately $1.7 billion to sales for the year. Collectively,
our other mutual Funds and hedge Funds experienced net
redemptions of approximately $0.2 billion for the year ended
December 31, 2010. Some of our offshore Funds had net
subscriptions while others experienced net redemptions,
resulting in net outflows of approximately $13 million for the

December 31,  2010

December 31,  2009

$
(in millions)

%
of  AUM

$
(in millions)

3,372

2,025

1,739

686

513

210

8,545

39.5%

23.7%

20.3%

8.0%

6.0%

2.5%

100%

2,305

96

1,408

507

315

143

4,774

%
of  AUM

48.3%

2.0%

29.5%

10.6%

6.6%

3.0%

100%

year ended December 31, 2010 (2.6%) of opening offshore
AUM. SRLC added approximately $100 million to the AUM
of Managed Companies during the year.

Revenues
During 2010, total revenues increased by $215.5 million
(200.4%) from $107.5 million in 2009 to $323.0 million
in 2010.

Management Fees increased by $15.7 million or 17.8%
from $88.0 million in 2009 to $103.7 million in 2010, as
monthly average AUM increased by approximately 30.7%
over the same period. Management Fee margins (defined as
Management Fees as a percentage of average AUM) fell to
1.77% in 2010 from 1.96% in 2009. The decrease in
Management Fee margins is mainly due to an increase in 2010
of approximately $1.9 billion (2009- $0.1 billion) in bullion
Funds, which have lower Management Fees than most of our
other Funds.

Performance Fees for the year ended December 31, 2010
were $200.1 million when compared to $13.0 million in the
prior year. In 2009, Performance fees were generated mainly
by hedge Funds, and offshore Funds. In 2010, Performance
Fees were generated mainly by hedge Funds and offshore
Funds with contributions by a few mutual Funds and
Managed Accounts. During 2010, more Funds and Managed
Accounts contributed to generating Performance Fees than in
2009. In addition, during 2010, several of the contributing
Funds and Managed Accounts that previously had carry-
forward return deficiencies, recaptured these deficiencies and
began accruing Performance Fees.

Gains from our capital that is invested in our proprietary
investments (realized and unrealized) totaled $8.5 million for

27
9

the year ended December 31, 2010. This is an increase of
$3.5 million from the previous year where gains from our
proprietary investments totaled $5.0 million. During the year
ended December 31, 2010, sales of proprietary investments
resulted in a net realized gain of $0.4 million and the market
value of proprietary investments appreciated by $8.1 million.
The unrealized gains in 2010 were driven by market
appreciation in virtually all of the Company’s proprietary
investments, with the majority being generated by the
Company’s investment in SRLC, a public company investment
in the resource sector, gold bullion and silver bullion and an
option. The realized gains in 2010 were primarily due to the
sale of publicly traded equities in the gold sector. During the
year ended December 31, 2009, the sale of proprietary
investments resulted in a net realized gain of $2.3 million
mainly from the reorganization of Sprott Molybdenum
Participation Corporation.

Commissions revenue for the year ended December 31,

2010, was $6.2 million compared to approximately
$0.1 million during the prior year. The significant increase in
commissions revenue was mainly due to commissions earned
by SPW LP on the sale of units of SPC, Sprott
Flow-Through LP, Sprott Physical Gold Trust, Sprott Physical
Silver Trust, SRLC and Sprott Private Credit Fund LP to
SPW LP clients in 2010.

Other income increased by $3.1 million from $1.4 million in

the year ended December 31, 2009 to $4.5 million in the year
ended December 31, 2010. In 2010, the main components of
other income were: interest income of $3.8 million, early
redemption fees of $0.5 million and dividends of $0.5 million
partially offset by a foreign exchange loss of $0.3 million. In
2009, other income consisted primarily of interest income of
$1.1 million and early redemption fees of $0.7 million
partially offset by a foreign exchange loss of $0.4 million.

Expenses
Total expenses for the year ended December 31, 2010 were
$150.0 million, an increase of $87.6 million or 140.5%,
compared with $62.4 million for 2009. The increase in the
current year is mainly attributable to an increase in
compensation and benefits of $55.7 million, an increase in
stock-based compensation of $25.7 million, trailer fees of
$2.4 million, general and administrative costs of $2.6 million,
and donations expense of $1.2 million.

Changes in specific categories are described in the following

discussion:

Compensation & Benefits
Compensation and benefits expense for the year ended
December 31, 2010 amounted to $83.7 million, including
contributions to the discretionary employee bonus pool of
$60.5 million. For the year ended December 31, 2009,
compensation and benefits expense was $28.0 million, with
contributions to the discretionary employee bonus pool
amounting to $13.2 million. Excluding the discretionary
employee bonus pool, compensation and benefits increased by
$8.4 million (56.8%) from $14.8 million in 2009 to
$23.2 million in 2010. This is primarily due to the increase in
headcount of the Company with the average number of
employees increasing from 80 in 2009 to 95 in 2010 and to
variable employee compensation payments associated with the
commission revenues discussed under the ‘‘Revenues’’ section
of this MD&A. The increase in the discretionary employee
bonus pool of $47.3 million (358.3%) from $13.2 million in
2009 to $60.5 million in 2010 is a result of both higher net
operating income and, more significantly, higher Performance
Fees in 2010.

Stock-based compensation
Stock-based compensation was $28.0 million for the year
ended December 31, 2010, an increase of $25.7 million,
compared to $2.3 million in 2009. The increase from 2009 is
the result of a share incentive program personally funded by
Mr. Sprott for the benefit of the Company’s new Chief
Executive Officer and the Company’s President
(the ‘‘Executives’’). This program provided the Executives with
a total of 8 million common shares of the Company from
Mr. Sprott’s personal holding company and did not result in
the issuance of shares from treasury by the Company. This
transaction was valued at $25.7 million reflecting the
maximum benefit conferred to the Executives as a result of the
arrangement and has been fully expensed in 2010 with a
corresponding increase to contributed surplus.

Trailer Fees
Trailer fees are somewhat correlated with AUM and with
Management Fees. For the year ended December 31, 2010
trailer fees of $21.6 million were 12.8% higher than trailer
fees of $19.2 million in 2009. Trailer fees as a percentage of
Management Fees for the year ended December 31, 2010 have
decreased to 20.9% from 21.8% for the year ended
December 31, 2009. This decline is mainly due to the increase

1028

Sprott Inc. Annual Report 2010
Sprott Inc. Annual Report 2010

in AUM of bullion Funds and the new Fixed Income Funds,
which pay no or low trailer fees.

General & Administrative
General and administrative expenses increased by
$2.6 million, or 24.4% to $13.4 million for the year ended
December 31, 2010 when compared to 2009. General and
administrative expenses consist primarily of rent, marketing,
regulatory fees, fund related costs, legal and professional fees
as well as miscellaneous costs such as quote and news services,
printing and system maintenance. The increase in general and
administrative expenses in 2010 is mainly due to the
investment of resources associated with the due diligence of
the Global Companies, the acquisition of which closed on
February 4, 2011. The Company also experienced increases in
its other general office expenses as a result of the increased
headcount during 2010. In 2010, the Company launched
Sprott Private Credit Fund LP and retained a third party to
provide the investment advisory services. The external
investment advisory service was a new expense in 2010 for the
Company. The Company also absorbed more expenses
incurred by some of the Funds that it manages in 2010 as
compared with 2009.

Charitable Donations
The Board of Directors of SAMI approved a charitable
donations program which became effective in fiscal 2008.
Under this program, the amount of charitable donations made
each year is 1% of the previous year’s net income before tax,
as may be adjusted from time to time based on profitability,
cash flow and other similar measures. In order to better match
the charitable donations expense with the associated income,
the Company changed the donation calculation methodology.
Previously the charitable donation accrual was calculated on
1% of previous year’s pre tax income. For 2010, we accrued
1% of current year’s income before taxes. In addition to
donations under the program that are directed specifically to
children’s charities, we make other corporate donations to
selected causes. Net income before income tax was higher in
2010 than in 2008 and as a result, the expense for charitable
donations is higher in 2010 than in 2009.

Amortization
Amortization expense is composed of amortization of property
and equipment and amortization of deferred sales
commissions. Amortization expense is slightly lower in 2010
when compared to 2009 due to lower amortization of
property and equipment that was almost fully offset by an
increase in amortization of deferred sales commissions. The

Company invested $0.2 million in property and equipment in
2010 versus $0.6 million in 2009. The Company invested
$0.9 million in deferred sales commissions in 2010 versus
$0.1 million in 2009.

EBITDA, Base EBITDA, Cash Flow from
Operations and Net Income
As discussed earlier, there are a number of non-GAAP
measures we use to evaluate the success of our business.

EBITDA allows us to assess our ongoing business without

the impact of interest expense, income taxes and certain
non-cash expenses, such as amortization and stock-based
compensation. EBITDA is an indicator of our ability to pay
dividends, invest in our business and continue operations.
For the year ended December 31, 2010, EBITDA was
$202.0 million compared with $48.5 million for the year
ended December 31, 2009. The increase in EBITDA in 2010
when compared to 2009 is mainly a result of higher
Management Fees, significantly higher Performance Fees,
higher gains on proprietary investments and commissions
generated by SPW LP, partially offset by higher trailer fees,
general and administrative expenses, donations and
compensation and benefits. EBITDA per share for 2010 was
$1.35 versus $0.32 for 2009. For further clarity, EBITDA is
reconciled to Net Income in the Summary Financial
Information table earlier in this MD&A.

Base EBITDA, as previously defined in this MD&A, allows
us to assess our ongoing business operations, with adjustments
for non-recurring items as well as items that are not related to
our core operations. For the year ended December 31, 2010
Base EBITDA was $43.4 million compared with $33.7 million
in 2009, representing an increase of 28.8%. Base EBITDA for
2010 increased when compared to 2009 based predominantly
on higher Management Fees. Base EBITDA excludes
(i) unrealized and realized gains on proprietary investments
and (ii) Performance Fees net of Performance Fee related
compensation and other Performance Fee related expenses. In
2010, unrealized and realized gains on proprietary investments
were $8.5 million versus $5.0 million in 2009. In 2010,
Performance Fees net of Performance Fee related
compensation and other Performance Fee related expenses
were $150.0 million compared to $9.7 million in 2009. Base
EBITDA per share for 2010 was $0.29 versus $0.22 for 2009.
For further clarity, Base EBITDA is reconciled to Net Income
in the Summary Financial Information table earlier in
this MD&A.

The Company also assesses its performance using Cash Flow

from Operations. Previously defined in this MD&A, this

29
11

metric helps to assess the ability of the Company to generate
cash to fund day-to-day operations, pay dividends, pay sales
commissions and support any other capital requirements of
the Company.

Cash Flow from Operations for 2010 was $151.6 million,

up significantly from $30.7 million in 2009. Similar to
EBITDA and Base EBITDA, the primary contributor to this
was the increase in Performance Fees net of Performance Fee
related compensation and other Performance Fee related
expenses. A significant difference between this measure and
EBITDA and Base EBITDA is that it takes into consideration
the income taxes paid or payable by the Company. In 2009,
the provision for income taxes was $13.3 million and in 2010,
the provision for income taxes was $41.8 million. Cash Flow
from Operations per share for 2010 was $1.01 versus $0.20
for 2009. For further clarity, Cash Flow from Operations is
reconciled to Net Income in the Summary Financial
Information table earlier in this MD&A.

Income before taxes for the year ended December 31, 2010

was $173.0 million compared with a pre-tax net income of
$45.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The
effective tax rate at 24.16% was lower for 2010 when
compared to 29.52% for 2009. The difference between the
statutory and effective rate is mostly from the combination of
non-taxable foreign affiliate income and the non-taxable
portion of capital gains and unrealized capital gains offset
slightly by the non-taxable stock-based compensation expense.

Net income for the year ended December 31, 2010 was
$131.2 million compared to net income of $31.8 million for
year ended December 31, 2009. The increases in Management
Fee revenue and Performance Fees offset partially by increased
compensation and benefits, stock-based compensation and
income taxes were the major contributors to the $99.4 million
change year over year. Net income per share, both basic and
fully diluted, for 2010 was $0.87 versus $0.21 for 2009.

Balance Sheet
Total assets at December 31, 2010 of $342.0 million are
$244.3 million more than at December 31, 2009. Cash and
cash equivalents of $81.2 million were $32.2 million higher
than at December 31, 2009 due to cash inflows, including
higher Management Fees, the monetization of prior year
accrued Performance Fees and the collection of commissions
by SPW LP that more than offset the cash out flow from the
net purchase of certain proprietary investments, operating
expenses, payment of bonuses and dividends.

Proprietary investments are discussed in more detail in the

Revenue section of this MD&A.

1230

Fees receivable at December 31, 2010 were $209.1 million,
which is $196.3 million higher than at December 31, 2009 as
fee receivables include approximately $197 million of year end
Performance Fees that were received in early 2011. Other
long-term assets as at December 31, 2010 consist of deferred
sales commissions and intangible assets with indefinite useful
lives, relating to certain costs incurred to create management
services contracts between SAM LP and certain Funds
managed by SAM LP.

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities were $17.0 million

at December 31, 2010, which is $12.5 million higher than at
December 31, 2009. This increase primarily reflects the
obligation by the Company to remit Harmonized Sales Tax to
the Government of Canada that was due as a result of
Performance Fees charged to certain Funds and Managed
Accounts.

Compensation and employee bonuses payable were

$61.6 million at December 31, 2010 compared to $9.2 million
at December 31, 2009. The calculation of this number is
correlated to net income.

Dividends
In the first quarter of 2010, the Company recorded a special
dividend in the amount of $0.04 per common share. The
special dividend related to Performance Fees received for 2009.
Regular dividends of $0.025 per common share were paid to

shareholders of record at the close of business on March 1,
2010, on May 21, 2010 and September 7, 2010.

In November 2010, a dividend of $0.03 per common share

was declared for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 and
was paid to shareholders of record at the close of business on
December 6, 2010.

On January 10, 2011, a special dividend in the amount of
$0.60 per common share was declared. The special dividend
related to Performance Fees received for 2010 and was paid to
shareholders of record at the close of business on
February 3, 2011.

On March 22, 2011, the Company declared a second special

dividend of $0.12 per common share related to Performance
Fees received for 2010. The shares issued from treasury on
February 4, 2011 as a result of the acquisition of the Global
Companies are not eligible to receive this dividend.

On March 22, 2011, the Company declared a dividend of
$0.03 per common share for the quarter ended December 31,
2010. The shares issued from treasury on February 4, 2011 as
a result of the acquisition of the Global Companies are not
eligible to receive this dividend.

Sprott Inc. Annual Report 2010
Sprott Inc. Annual Report 2010

Capital Stock
There was no change in the capital stock of the Company during 2010. The capital stock remained at $40.1 million with
150,000,000 common shares issued and outstanding. As at March 22, 2011, there were 169,467,500 common shares issued and
outstanding as a result of the acquisition of the Global Companies.

On February 4, 2011, the Company completed its acquisition of the Global Companies which resulted in the issuance of

19,467,500 common shares from treasury valued at $168.8 million. An additional 532,500 common shares of the Company will
be provided to employees of the Global Companies during 2011.

Earnings per share as at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 have been calculated using the weighted average number

of shares outstanding during the respective periods. Basic and diluted earnings per share were $0.87 for the year ended
December 31, 2010 and $0.21 for the year ended December 31, 2009.

A total of 2,650,000 stock options have been issued pursuant to our incentive stock option plan. In the first quarter of 2010,
100,000 options were cancelled and 50,000 new options were granted. In the fourth quarter of 2010, 150,000 new options were
granted, bringing the stock option balance to 2,650,000 options outstanding. As at December 31, 2010, 1,633,000 of those
stock options were exercisable.

31
13

Summary of Quarterly Results
The following is the summary of quarterly results of the Company for the eight most recently completed quarters.

Summary Income Statements and Reconciliation to EBITDA and Base EBITDA

($  in  thousands,
except  per  share  amounts)

3 Months
ending
31-Mar-09

3 Months
ending
30-Jun-09

3 Months
ending
30-Sep-09

3 Months
ending
31-Dec-09

3 Months
ending
31-Mar-10

3 Months
ending
30-Jun-10

3 Months
ending
30-Sep-10

3 Months
ending
31-Dec-10

Assets Under Management

4,724,653 4,444,146 4,338,422 4,773,789

5,155,224 5,546,430 6,513,445 8,545,276

Income Statement Information
Revenue

Management fees

Performance fees

Unrealized and realized gain (loss)
on proprietary investments

Commissions

Other income

Total revenue

Expenses

Compensation and benefits

Stock-based compensation

Trailer fees

General and administrative

Donations

Amortization

Total Expenses

22,596

21,673

20,702

23,052

23,248

24,212

24,692

31,534

1,810

2,143

21

86

405

767

8

239

152

10,614

–

196

719

199,139

657

28

492

1,465

(897)

1,132

2,852

23

592

2,586

325

444

800

340

487

5,450

2,841

2,925

26,656

23,092

22,031

35,746

25,262

26,784

29,090

241,889

7,125

574

4,589

3,040

284

216

6,540

574

4,831

2,794

292

223

5,638

574

4,672

2,620

285

197

8,695

574

5,099

2,290

282

355

7,700

567

5,070

2,611

458

172

6,967

567

5,143

2,974

171

186

7,482

61,515

567

26,300

5,099

2,637

173

193

6,337

5,249

1,580

280

15,828

15,254

13,986

17,295

16,578

16,008

16,151

101,261

Income before income taxes

10,828

7,838

8,045

18,451

8,684

10,776

12,939

140,628

Provision for income taxes

3,407

2,248

2,539

5,138

2,759

3,100

3,340

32,596

Net Income

Other expenses

Provision for income taxes

7,421

5,590

5,506

13,313

5,925

7,676

9,599

108,032

790

3,407

797

2,248

771

2,539

930

5,138

759

2,759

788

3,100

807

26,580

3,340

32,596

EBITDA

11,618

8,635

8,816

19,381

9,443

11,564

13,746

167,208

Unrealized and realized (gains)
losses on proprietary investments

Performance fees net of performance
fee-related compensation and other
performance fee related expenses

(2,143)

(767)

(657)

(1,465)

897

(1,132)

(2,852)

(5,450)

(1,357)

(304)

(114)

(7,961)

–

(147)

(539)

(149,354)

Base EBITDA

8,118

7,564

8,045

9,955

10,340

10,285

10,355

12,404

Basic and diluted earnings per share

0.05

0.04

0.03

0.09

0.04

0.05

0.06

0.72

*

Average of month-end AUM

1432

Sprott Inc. Annual Report 2010
Sprott Inc. Annual Report 2010

Summary Cash Flow Statements and Reconciliation to Cash Flow from Operations

(In $ 000’s,  except  per  share  amounts)

Operating activities

3 Months
ending
31-Mar-09

3 Months
ending
30-Jun-09

3 Months
ending
30-Sep-09

3 Months
ending
31-Dec-09

3 Months
ending
31-Mar-10

3 Months
ending
30-Jun-10

3 Months
ending
30-Sep-10

3 Months
ending
31-Dec-10

Net income for the quarter

7,421

5,590

5,506

13,313

Non-cash items

(1,072)

(390)

330

(15)

Cash flow from operations

6,349

5,200

5,836

13,298

5,925

2,050

7,975

7,676

9,599

108,032

(163)

(1,683)

20,067

7,513

7,916

128,099

(9,283)

(10,756)

586

(4,043)

8,683

4,077

3,488

(107,209)

Non-cash balances relating to
operations

Cash provided by operating
activities

Cash used in investing activities

(6,739)

(11,251)

(2,934)

(5,556)

6,422

7,104

9,255

321

16,658

11,590

11,404

20,890

(384)

1,619

(19,877)

12,049

Cash used in financing activities

(3,750)

(26,250)

(3,750)

(3,750)

(9,750)

(3,750)

(3,750)

(4,500)

Net increase (decrease) in cash and
cash equivalents during the quarter

Cash and cash equivalents,
beginning of the quarter

Cash and cash equivalents, end of
the quarter

Cash flow from operations per
share – basic

Cash flow from operations per
share – fully diluted

(13,423)

(43,057)

9,776

5,826

6,524

9,459

(12,223)

28,439

89,888

76,465

33,408

43,184

49,010

55,534

64,993

52,770

76,465

33,408

43,184

49,010

55,534

64,993

52,770

81,209

0.04

0.03

0.04

0.09

0.05

0.05

0.05

0.85

0.04

0.03

0.04

0.09

0.05

0.05

0.05

0.85

As discussed under ‘‘Metrics of Our Business’’ above,
Performance Fees of our Funds, Managed Accounts and
Managed Companies are determined as of December 31 each
year. Through the first three quarters of the year, Performance
Fees reported in the Company’s financial statements reflect
Crystallized Performance Fees. To the extent that we earn
Performance Fees on any of the Funds, Managed Accounts and
Managed Companies, these are reflected in the fourth quarter.
Performance Fee related compensation of 25% of Performance
Fees is recorded in the quarter when such fees are earned.
In the fourth quarter of 2010, Performance Fees in the

amount of $199.1 million were accrued. In the fourth quarter
of 2009, total Performance Fees of $10.6 million were
recorded. Of the $199.1 million (2009 – $10.6 million),
$192.8 million (2009 – $10.6 million) of Performance Fees
were generated from Funds, $6.3 million (2009 – $nil) from
Managed Accounts and $nil (2009 – $nil) from Managed
Companies.

There is generally no other seasonality to our earnings and
the trends in fees and expenses relate primarily to the level of

our AUM. In addition, there are no special or unusual
adjustments to the financial statements at year-end.

The fourth quarter of 2010 saw AUM increasing by

$2,032 million from $6,513 million at September 30, 2010 to
$8,545 million at December 31, 2010. The increase reflected a
combination of net sales of $573 million and net market value
appreciation of the Funds, Managed Accounts and Managed
Companies of $1,459 million. Most of the total net sales for
the quarter related to the launch of the Sprott Physical
Silver Trust.

Liquidity and Capital Resources
Management Fees can be projected and forecasted with a
higher degree of certainty than Performance Fees, and are
therefore used as a base for budgeting and planning in our
business. Management Fees are collected monthly or quarterly
and to a lesser extent, annually, which assists our ability to
manage cash flow. We believe that Management Fees will
continue to be sufficient to satisfy our ongoing operational
needs, including expenditure on our corporate infrastructure,
business development and information systems. The nature of

33
15

our operations ensures that the largest outflows, such as trailer
fees and monthly compensation, are correlated with cash
inflows, in the form of Management Fees. Fixed costs, such as
rent, base payroll and general and administrative expenses are
managed to comprise a relatively low percentage of monthly
Management Fees.

We do not have off-balance sheet contractual arrangements

and no material contractual obligations other than our
long-term lease agreement expiring on December 31, 2013.
Subsequent to the year-end, we established a revolving term
credit facility with a Canadian chartered bank in the amount
of $50 million.

SPW LP is a member of IIROC and a registered investment

Stock-based compensation expense is estimated based on the

value of the option on its grant date. Management adopted a
fair value-based valuation methodology as required by GAAP
that will best determine the value of options and the cost over
the vesting period of the option. The valuation model utilizes
multiple observable market inputs including interest rates,
however the model requires judgment and assumptions be
applied in determining certain inputs including expected
volatility and expected option life. Management reviews all
inputs on a regular basis to ensure consistency of application
and reasonableness. Details regarding stock options granted,
including key inputs and assumptions are contained in
note 6(b) to the Company’s audited consolidated financial

dealer and SAM LP is an OSC registrant in the category of PM statements.
and EMD, and as such each of SPW LP and SAM LP is
required to maintain a minimum amount of regulatory capital
calculated in accordance with the rules of IIROC and of the
OSC, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2010,
SAM LP and SPW LP were in compliance with the specified
capital requirements.

Critical Accounting Estimates
The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with
GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and
expenses during the reporting period. Actual results may vary
from the current estimates. Items that require use of estimates
and assumptions include income taxes, stock-based
compensation and the valuation of certain proprietary
investments.

A portion of Performance Fee revenue is earned by a wholly-

Some of the Company’s proprietary investments are

classified as available for sale and/or loans and receivables.
Such investments are generally not traded in an active market
and are valued at cost less other than temporary impairment, if
any, or at ‘‘fair value’’. Management monitors all proprietary
investments on a regular basis and makes all reasonable efforts
to obtain publicly available information related to such
investments. However, since the amount of information for
investments that are not publicly traded is often limited, fair
value of certain available for sale and loans and receivables
investments could subsequently prove to differ from amounts
at which they are carried on the balance sheet.

Certain fees recoverable from Funds or third parties relate to
new investment products and are contingent upon a successful
completion of such product launches. Management evaluates
such assets on a regular basis and only capitalizes the portion
of the recoverable that is more likely than not to be recovered.
We review all estimates periodically and, as adjustments
become necessary, they are reported in income in the period in
which they become known.

Financial Instruments

owned subsidiary that acts as the general partner to the
domestic limited partnerships managed by us. For income tax
purposes, as at the end of each income tax year these
Performance Fees are an allocation of partnership income and, Our financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents,
for the purposes of calculating taxable income, consists of
capital gains and/or losses, interest income, dividend income,
carrying charges and other types of income and expenses
allocated to the general partner. We work with third party
advisors to calculate allocations of partnership income,
however, such allocations involve a certain degree of
estimation. Income tax estimates could change as a result of
change in taxation laws and regulations, both domestic and
foreign, an amendment to the calculation of allocation of
partnership income and/or a change in foreign affiliate rules.

proprietary investments (excluding gold and silver bullion),
fees receivable, other current assets, accounts payable and
accrued liabilities and compensation and employee bonuses
payable. All proprietary investments considered financial
instruments are recorded on the balance sheet at their fair
values except for proprietary investments in private equities
which are recorded at cost less any impairment.

proprietary investments is the carrying value thereof. The
market value of our proprietary investments varies daily based

The maximum loss that the Company can incur in respect of

1634

Sprott Inc. Annual Report 2010
Sprott Inc. Annual Report 2010

on general market conditions and the values of securities in the
relevant Funds.

Changes in Accounting Policies
Effective December 31, 2010, the Company elected to early
adopt as of January 1, 2010 three CICA Handbook sections as
a result of the acquisition of the Global Companies.
Specifically, CICA Handbook Section 1582, Business
Combinations, Section 1601, Consolidated Financial
Statements and Section 1602, Non-Controlling Interest were
adopted with no material impact to the Company’s audited
consolidated financial statements. These Handbook Sections
are converged with International Financial Reporting
Standards. In accordance with the transitional provisions,
these Handbook Sections were applied on a prospective basis,
from January 1, 2010 with the exception of the presentation
and disclosure requirements for non-controlling interests
which were applied retrospectively.

Future accounting changes

International Financial Reporting Standards
(‘‘IFRS’’)
The use of IFRS will be required commencing 2011 for
publicly accountable, profit oriented enterprises. IFRS will
replace Canadian GAAP currently followed by the Company.
The Company will be required to begin reporting under IFRS
for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 and will be
required to provide information that conforms with IFRS for
the comparative periods presented.

We implemented an IFRS changeover plan and completed a
preliminary analysis of transition impacts in 2009. We engaged
an independent accounting firm to assist us with the IFRS
changeover analysis and plan. Our IFRS conversion plan
addresses matters including changes in accounting policy, the
restatement of comparative periods, organizational and
internal control, training and awareness of staff in addition to
other related business matters. Overall responsibility for the
implementation and success of the conversion plan rests with
the Company’s senior financial management who report to
and are overseen by the Audit Committee.

We have determined that the transition to IFRS would not

have a material impact on the financial statements of the
Company. During 2010, the Company continued monitoring
new standards and amendments to existing standards and
concluded there are no new standards or amendments to
existing IFRS standards that will alter the previous guidance
issued by the Company for its upcoming first quarterly report
under IFRS.

The Company intends to make the following policy choices

under IFRS 1 First time adoption of IFRS:
• IFRS 3 Business Combinations will not be applied to

acquisitions of subsidiaries or of interests in associates and
joint ventures that occurred before January 1, 2010, which
means that all past business combinations will not
be restated.

• IFRS 2 Share-based Payments will not be applied to equity
instruments that were granted on or before November 7,
2002, nor will it be applied to equity instruments granted
after November 7, 2002 that vested before January 1, 2010.

• Financial assets classified as available-for-sale under

Canadian GAAP will be re-designated as fair value through
profit or loss under IAS 39 Financial Instruments –
Recognition and Measurement. These financial assets are
managed and their performance is evaluated on a fair value
basis, in accordance with a documented investment strategy.
The Company expects the following adjustments to its

financial statements as a result of transition to IFRS:
• The value of proprietary investments will increase by

approximately $250 thousand as at January 1, 2010 as a
result of re-designating financial assets classified as
available-for-sale under Canadian GAAP at fair value
through profit or loss under IAS 39. The impact of this
adjustment is not material to either the opening balance
sheet or 2010 net income.

• For equity instruments, such as stock options, the timing of
expense recognition differs between Canadian GAAP and
IFRS. While the total stock option expense calculation is
similar under the two sets of standards, under IFRS, the
expense is recognized on a graded vesting schedule as
compared with straight line vesting under Canadian GAAP.
This will result in a larger portion of the expense being
recognized earlier in the vesting period. Since the Company
intends to make an election under IFRS for equity
instruments that vested before January 1, 2010, the
difference only impacts stock options that vest after this
date. An adjustment will be recorded as at January 1, 2010
to account for the difference. This adjustment is not
material, since it is a reclassification between contributed
surplus and opening retained earnings. The adjustment for
existing equity instruments will not have a material impact
on 2010 net income to date. For the share incentive program
granted to Mr. Grosskopf and Mr. Bambrough in 2010
(see Business Highlights and Growth Initiatives earlier in this
MD&A) by Mr. Sprott personally, the accounting treatment
adopted for GAAP in these audited consolidated financial

35
17

Managing Risk
There are certain risks inherent in the activities of the
Company, including risks related to general market conditions;
changes in the financial markets; failure to retain and attract
qualified staff; poor investment performance; changes in the
investment management industry; competitive pressures;
failure to manage risks; rapid growth; regulatory compliance;
public company reporting and other regulatory obligations;
historical financial information not necessarily indicative of
future performance; failure to execute our succession plan;
conflicts of interest; litigation risk; employee errors or
misconduct; effectiveness of information security policies,
procedures and capabilities; failure to develop effective
business continuity plans; entering new lines of business;
fluctuations in Performance Fees; rapid growth or decline in
our AUM; insufficient insurance coverage; possible volatility
of the share price; and control by a principal shareholder.

We have processes and procedures in place to monitor and

mitigate these risks to the extent reasonable and practicable
within the framework of our overall strategic objectives of
delivering excellence in investment performance.

Certain key risks are managed as described below:

Market Risk
We monitor, evaluate and manage the principal risks
associated with the conduct of our business. These risks
include external market risks to which all investors are subject
and internal risk resulting from the nature of our business. In
SAM LP, at the investment product level, we manage risk
through the selection, weighting and monitoring of individual
investments based on stated investment objectives and
strategies. At SPW LP, we manage risk at the asset allocation
level, by focusing on mitigating risk through the appropriate
selection and weighting of portfolio investments for each client
to reflect their suitability and risk tolerance.

Internal Controls and Procedures
Both SAM LP and SPW LP operate in a regulated environment
and are subject to business conduct rules and other rules and
regulations. We have internal control policies related to our
business conduct. They include controls required to ensure
compliance with the rules and regulations of relevant
regulatory bodies including the OSC and IIROC.

statements will not change after the adoption of IFRS
effective January 1, 2011.
In addition to policies discussed above, as part of its IFRS
changeover plan, the Company identified other potential high
and medium impact areas, including consolidation of the
various Funds managed by SAM LP and Managed Companies
by SCLP, recognition of intangible assets and accounting for
property and equipment.
• Consolidation of the various Funds managed by SAM LP
has been noted as high impact because any requirement to
consolidate the Funds that we manage with the Company’s
balance sheet and statements of income and cash flows
would have a material impact on the consolidated financial
statements. After a detailed analysis, it was determined that
currently the Company is not required to consolidate Funds
managed by SAM LP under IFRS. Similarly, it was
determined that the Company is not required to consolidate
Managed Companies managed by SCLP under IFRS.

• Intangible assets recognition and measurement criteria are
similar under Canadian GAAP and IFRS; therefore, no
material differences were identified.

• There are certain differences in accounting for property and
equipment under IFRS and Canadian GAAP. After a review
of the Company’s property and equipment, it was
determined that no material adjustments will be required.

• There are a number of disclosure differences that exist
between Canadian GAAP and IFRS. Since these are
disclosure items, they are not expected to have a material
impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Related Party Transactions
Most of the artwork displayed in our office area was rented
from Mr. Sprott, Chairman of the Company as well as from
Sprott Securities Ltd., a corporation wholly-owned by
Mr. Sprott. The rental rate was equal to 3% per annum of the
original acquisition cost of such artwork. Mr. Sprott and
Sprott Securities Ltd. terminated the artwork rental charges
effective May 2009.

In September 2010, Mr. Sprott, Chairman of the Company,

personally funded a share incentive program through his
personal holding company. The program provided
Mr. Grosskopf and Mr. Bambrough with a total of 8 million
common shares of the Company. This arrangement did not
result in the issuance of common shares from the treasury of
the Company. See note 6(b) of the Company’s audited
consolidated financial statements for additional information.

1836

Sprott Inc. Annual Report 2010
Sprott Inc. Annual Report 2010

Disclosure Controls and Procedures (‘‘DC&P’’)
and Internal Control over Financial Reporting
(‘‘ICFR’’)
Management is responsible for the design and operational
effectiveness of DC&P and ICFR in order to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the disclosure of material
information relating to the Company and information
required to be disclosed in our annual filings, interim filings
and other reports filed under securities legislation, as well as
the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with GAAP.

Consistent with National Instrument 52-109, the

Company’s CEO and CFO have evaluated the DC&P and
ICFR as of December 31, 2010 and concluded that the
controls have been properly designed and are operating
effectively.

There was no change in the Company’s internal control over

financial reporting that occurred during fiscal 2010 that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Conflicts of Interest
Internally, we have established a number of policies with
respect to our employees’ personal trading. Employees may
not trade any of the securities held or being considered for
investment by any of our Funds without prior approval. In
addition, employees must receive prior approval before they
are permitted to buy or sell securities. Speculative trading is
strongly discouraged. While employees are permitted to have
investments managed by third parties on a discretionary basis,
they generally choose to invest in the Funds. All of our
employees must comply with our Code of Ethics. This Code
establishes strict rules for professional conduct and
management of conflicts of interest.

Independent Review Committee
National Instrument 81-107 – Independent Review Committee
for Investment Funds (‘‘NI 81-107’’) requires all publicly

offered investment funds to establish an independent review
committee to whom all conflicts of interest matters must be
referred for review or approval. We have established one
independent review committee for all of our public mutual
Funds. As required by NI 81-107, we have established written
policies and procedures for dealing with conflict of interest
matters, and we maintain records in respect of these matters
and provide assistance to the independent review committee in
carrying out its functions. The independent review committee
is comprised of three independent members, and is subject to
requirements to conduct regular assessments and provide
reports to us and to the holders of interests in our public
mutual Funds in respect of its functions.

Confidentiality of Information
We believe that confidentiality is essential to the success of our
business, and we strive to consistently maintain the highest
standards of trust, integrity and professionalism. Account
information is kept under strict control in compliance with all
applicable laws, and physical, procedural, and electronic
safeguards are maintained in order to protect this information
from access by unauthorized parties. We keep the affairs of our
clients confidential and do not disclose the identities of our
clients (absent express client consent to do so). If a prospective
client requests a reference, we will not furnish the name of an
existing client before receiving permission from that client to
reveal their business relationship with us.

Insurance
We maintain appropriate insurance coverage for general
business and liability risks as well insurance coverage required
by regulation. We review our insurance coverage periodically
to ensure continued adequacy.

Additional information relating to the Company is available

on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.

37
19

MANAGEMENT’S  RESPONSIBILITY  FOR  FINANCIAL  REPORTING

The accompanying consolidated financial statements, which consolidate the financial results of Sprott Inc. (the ‘‘Company’’),
were prepared by management, who are responsible for the integrity and fairness of all information presented in the consolidated
financial statements and management’s discussion and analysis (‘‘MD&A’’) for the year ended December 31, 2010. The
consolidated financial statements were prepared by management in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting
principles. Financial information presented in the MD&A is consistent with that in the consolidated financial statements.

In management’s opinion, the consolidated financial statements have been properly prepared within reasonable limits of
materiality and within the framework of the significant accounting policies summarized in note 2 of the consolidated financial
statements. Management maintains a system of internal controls to meet its responsibilities for the integrity of the consolidated
financial statements.

The board of directors (the ‘‘Board of Directors’’) of the Company appoints the Company’s audit committee (the ‘‘Audit

Committee’’) annually. Among other things, the mandate of the Audit Committee includes the review of the consolidated
financial statements of the Company on a quarterly basis and the recommendation to the Board of Directors for approval. The
Audit Committee has access to management and the auditors to review their activities and to discuss the external audit program,
internal controls, accounting policies and financial reporting matters.

Ernst & Young LLP performed an independent audit of the consolidated financial statements, as outlined in the auditors’
report contained herein. Ernst & Young LLP had, and has, full and unrestricted access to management of the Company, the
Audit Committee and the Board of Directors to discuss their audit and related findings and have the right to request a meeting in
the absence of management at any time.

‘‘Peter Grosskopf’’

Peter Grosskopf
Chief Executive Officer

March 22, 2011

‘‘Steven Rostowsky’’

Steven Rostowsky
Chief Financial Officer

2038

Sprott Inc. Annual Report 2010
Sprott Inc. Annual Report 2010

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’  REPORT

To the Shareholders of
Sprott Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of Sprott Inc. (the ‘‘Company’’), which comprise the
consolidated balance sheets as at December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the consolidated statements of income, comprehensive
income and retained earnings and cash flows for the years then ended, and a summary of significant accounting policies and
other explanatory information.

Management’s responsibility for the consolidated financial statements
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these consolidated financial statements in accordance
with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles, and for such internal control as management determines is necessary to
enable the preparation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud
or error.

Auditors’ responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our
audits in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we comply with ethical
requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements
are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated

financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditors’ judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material
misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the
auditors consider internal control relevant to the entity’s preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial
statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an
opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting
policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation
of the consolidated financial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained in our audits is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our

audit opinion.

Opinion
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company
as at December 31, 2010 and 2009 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in accordance
with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles.

23MAR201021594816
Chartered Accountants
Licensed Public Accountants

Toronto, Canada
March 22, 2011

39
21

CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE  SHEETS

As  at  December 31  ($  in  thousands)

Assets
Current

Cash and cash equivalents

Fees receivable

Other assets

Total current assets

Proprietary investments (Note 3)

Future income tax asset (Note 11)

Property and equipment, net (Note 4)

Other long-term assets (Note 5)

Total assets

Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Current

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

Compensation and employee bonuses payable

Income taxes payable

Total current liabilities

Future income tax liability (Note 11)

Total liabilities

Shareholders’ equity
Capital stock (Note 6)

Contributed surplus (Note 6)

Retained earnings

Total shareholders’ equity

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

See accompanying notes

Subsequent Events (Note 16)

On behalf of the Board

30MAR200910492278

Eric Sprott
Director,
Chairman

2240

2010
$

2009
$

81,209

209,078

2,025

292,312

41,884

1,935

3,705

2,201

49,725

342,037

17,010

61,644

47,991

126,645

1,769

128,414

40,105

31,821

141,697

213,623

342,037

49,010

12,751

2,248

64,009

28,004

1,289

4,298

94

33,685

97,694

4,546

9,192

7,323

21,061

493

21,554

40,105

3,820

32,215

76,140

97,694

27FEB200816221983

James Roddy
Director,
Chair of Audit Committee

Sprott Inc. Annual Report 2010
Sprott Inc. Annual Report 2010

CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENTS  OF  INCOME,  COMPREHENSIVE  INCOME
AND RETAINED EARNINGS

For  the  years  ended  December 31  ($ in thousands, except for per share amounts)

Revenue
Management fees

Performance fees

Unrealized and realized gains on proprietary investments

Commissions

Other income

Total revenue

Expenses
Compensation and benefits

Stock-based compensation (Note 6)

Trailer fees

General and administrative

Donations

Amortization

Total expenses

Income before income taxes for the year

Provision for income taxes (Note 11)

Net income and comprehensive income for the year

Retained earnings, beginning of the year

Dividends declared

Retained earnings, end of the year

2010
$

2009
$

103,686

200,054

8,537

6,211

4,537

88,023

12,981

5,032

80

1,409

323,025

107,525

83,664

28,001

21,649

13,369

2,382

933

149,998

173,027

41,795

131,232

32,215

(21,750)

141,697

27,998

2,296

19,191

10,743

1,143

992

62,363

45,162

13,332

31,830

37,885

(37,500)

32,215

Basic and diluted earnings per share (Note 10)

$

0.87

$

0.21

See accompanying notes

41
23

CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENTS  OF  CASH  FLOWS

For  the  years  ended  December 31  ($  in  thousands)

Operating Activities
Net income for the year

Add (deduct) non-cash items:

Unrealized and realized gains on proprietary investments

Stock-based compensation

Amortization of property and equipment

Amortization of deferred sales commissions

Future income taxes

Other items

Fees receivable

Other assets

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

Compensation and employee bonuses payable

Income taxes payable

Cash provided by operating activities

Investing Activities
Purchase of proprietary investments

Sale of proprietary investments

Purchase of property and equipment

Deferred sales commissions paid

Other long-term assets

Cash used in investing activities

Financing Activities
Dividends paid

Cash used in financing activities

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents during the year

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the year

Cash and cash equivalents, end of the year

Cash and cash equivalents:

Cash

Short-term deposits

Supplemental cash flow information

Income taxes paid

Interest paid

See accompanying notes

2442

2010
$

2009
$

131,232

31,830

(8,537)

28,001

757

176

630

(654)

(5,032)

2,296

988

4

685

(88)

151,605

30,683

(196,327)

223

12,464

52,452

40,668

61,085

(25,432)

20,743

(164)

(913)

(1,370)

(7,136)

(21,750)

(21,750)

32,199

49,010

81,209

15,341

65,868

81,209

806

(1,448)

(1,079)

(12,618)

(9,157)

7,187

(25,226)

15,349

(590)

(98)

–

(10,565)

(37,500)

(37,500)

(40,878)

89,888

49,010

17,223

31,787

49,010

497

–

21,893

–

Sprott Inc. Annual Report 2010
Sprott Inc. Annual Report 2010

NOTES  TO  THE  CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS
For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009

1. Corporate Activities
Sprott Inc. (the ‘‘Company’’) was incorporated under the
Business Corporations Act (Ontario) on February 13, 2008.
The Company was incorporated to acquire, through an
exchange of shares, all of the shares of Sprott Asset
Management Inc. (‘‘SAMI’’).

On May 8, 2008, the Company filed a prospectus in each of
the provinces and territories of Canada in respect of the initial
public offering of 20 million common shares to be effected via
a secondary offering by certain shareholders of the Company.
Common shares of the Company are traded on the Toronto
Stock Exchange (‘‘TSX’’) under the symbol SII.

On June 1, 2009, SAMI completed a corporate

reorganization and transferred its discretionary portfolio
management business to Sprott Asset Management LP
(‘‘SAM LP’’) and its broker dealer services to Sprott Private
Wealth LP (‘‘SPW LP’’). After the reorganization, SAMI was
wound up into the Company. As a result of the reorganization,
the Company is now the sole limited partner of SAM LP,
SPW LP and Sprott Consulting LP (‘‘SCLP’’). The
reorganization had no impact on the consolidated financial
statements. SAM LP is registered with the Ontario Securities
Commission (‘‘OSC’’) as a portfolio manager and exempt
market dealer and SPW LP is an investment dealer and a
member of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization
of Canada (‘‘IIROC’’). SPW LP has a Type II introducing
broker agreement with Cormark Securities Inc. (‘‘Cormark’’).
Under the terms of the agreement, Cormark performs trading,
clearing, segregation/safekeeping and recordkeeping services
for SPW LP. SCLP provides management and administrative
services to other companies.

2. Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting
Policies

Basis of presentation
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared by
management in accordance with Canadian generally accepted
accounting principles (‘‘GAAP’’) and include the accounts of
the Company, its wholly-owned subsidiaries as well as three
limited partnerships in which the Company is the sole limited
partner. The three limited partnerships are SAM LP, SPW LP
and SCLP while the material wholly-owned subsidiaries are
Sprott Genpar Ltd. and SAMGENPAR Ltd. All intercompany
accounts have been eliminated on consolidation.

Use of estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
Canadian GAAP requires management to make estimates and

assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at
the date of the consolidated financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the
reporting periods. Actual results may vary from the current
estimates. Management reviews these estimates periodically
and, as adjustments become necessary, they are reported in
income in the period in which they become known.

Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on deposit with
banks and with the carrying broker, which are not subject to
restrictions, and short-term interest bearing notes and treasury
bills with a term to maturity of less than three months from the
date of purchase.

Proprietary investments
Securities transactions and related revenue and expenses are
accounted for on a trade-date basis.

Revenue recognition
The Company, through SAM LP and SCLP, receives
management fees from the funds, managed accounts and
companies that it manages at annual rates ranging from
0.35% to 2.50% per annum of the respective net assets. The
management fees are recognized on an accrual basis over the
period during which the related services are rendered and are
collected monthly, quarterly or annually.

The Company also earns performance fees, calculated for

each particular fund, managed account and/or managed
company as a percentage of: (i) the fund’s/managed account’s
excess performance over the relevant benchmark; (ii) the
increase in net asset values over a predetermined hurdle, if any;
or (iii) the net profit in the fund over the performance period.
Performance fee revenue is recognized when earned, according
to agreements in the underlying funds, managed accounts and
managed companies.

The Company, through SPW LP, primarily earns trailer fee
income and may earn commissions from the sale of new and
follow-on offerings of products managed by the Company and
through private placements to clients of SPW LP. Trailer fee
income and commission income is recognized on an accrual
basis over the period during which the related service
is rendered.

43
25

Financial instruments
Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (‘‘CICA’’)
Handbook Section 3855, Financial Instruments – Recognition
and Measurement, permits an entity to designate any financial
instrument as held for trading on initial recognition, even if
that instrument would not otherwise satisfy the definition of
held for trading set out in Section 3855. This is referred to as
the fair value option. Financial instruments that are designated
as held for trading must have reliable fair values since they are
required to be presented at fair value. The Company has
elected to apply the fair value option for certain financial
assets and financial liabilities that do not otherwise meet the
definition of held for trading set out in Section 3855. Financial
assets designated as held for trading may include cash and cash
equivalents, precious metal bullion, mutual funds, hedge funds
and shares of publicly traded companies. Fair values for these
investments are determined by reference to published bid price
quotations, when available. Financial assets designated as held
for trading are measured at fair value with changes in their fair
value included in income in the period in which such
changes occur.

assesses at each reporting date whether a financial asset or
group of financial assets classified as loans and receivables are
impaired. If there is objective evidence that an impairment loss
has been incurred, the amount of the loss is measured as the
difference between the asset’s carrying amount and the present
value of estimated future cash flows. The carrying amount of
the asset is reduced through the use of an allowance account
and the amount of the loss is recognized through the income
statement.

The Company’s financial instruments are recorded on a
trade-date basis. Transaction costs related to financial assets,
both held for trading and available for sale, are expensed
as incurred.

A fair value hierarchy is used to disclose information about

financial instruments measured at fair value and has the
following levels:

Level 1 – quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for

identical assets;

Level 2 – inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1

that are observable for the asset either directly or indirectly;

Level 3 – inputs for the asset that are not based on

The Company’s financial instruments for which fair value

observable market data.

cannot be reliably measured are designated as available for
sale and recorded at cost less impairment, if any. Equity
instruments classified as available for sale include investments
in private companies. For available for sale financial
investments, the Company assesses individually whether there
is objective evidence that an equity investment is impaired at
each reporting date. Objective evidence would include a
significant or prolonged decline in the fair value of the
investment below its cost. Where there is evidence of
impairment, the cumulative loss – measured as the difference
between the acquisition cost and the current fair value, less any
impairment loss on that investment previously recognized in
the income statement – is recognized in the income statement.
Impairment losses on equity investments are not reversed
through the income statement. If subsequent to initial
recognition, fair value for available for sale investments
becomes readily available, such assets remain classified as
available for sale and are measured at fair value with changes
in fair value recorded in other comprehensive income until the
financial asset is disposed of or becomes impaired.

Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets
with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an
active market. Such financial assets are carried at amortized
cost using the effective interest rate method. The Company
includes in this category amounts relating to short-term
receivables and a secured note receivable. The Company

Precious metal bullion
Precious metal bullion includes investments in gold and silver
bullion. Investments in precious metal bullion are measured at
fair value determined by reference to published price
quotations, with unrealized and realized gains and losses
recorded in income.

Property and equipment
Property and equipment are recorded at cost and are
amortized on a declining balance basis at rates ranging from
0% to 100% per annum. Leasehold improvements are
amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the
respective lease. The artwork is not amortized since it does not
have a determinable useful life.

Earnings per share
Basic and diluted earnings per share are computed by dividing
net income by the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding during the year.

The Company applies the treasury stock method to
determine the dilutive impact, if any, of stock options,
assuming they were exercised in a reporting period. The
treasury stock method assumes that all proceeds received by
the Company when options are exercised will be used to
purchase Company shares at the average market price during
the year.

2644

Sprott Inc. Annual Report 2010
Sprott Inc. Annual Report 2010

Foreign currency transactions
Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign
currencies are translated into Canadian dollars at exchange
rates prevailing at the consolidated balance sheet dates and
non-monetary items are translated at exchange rates prevailing
at the transaction dates. Revenue and expenses denominated in
foreign currencies are translated at the rates of exchange in
effect when the transactions occurred. Foreign exchange gains
or losses are included in income for the year.

Income taxes
Income taxes are accounted for using the liability method.
Under this method, future income tax assets and liabilities are
recognized for the future income tax consequences attributable
to differences between the financial statement carrying values
and their respective income tax bases. Future income tax assets
and liabilities are measured using the substantively enacted tax
rates and laws expected to apply to taxable income in the
periods in which the temporary differences are expected to be
recovered or settled. The effect on future income tax assets and
liabilities of a change in tax rates and laws is included in
income in the period in which the change occurs. The amount
of any future income tax assets recognized is limited to the
amount that is more likely than not to be realized.

Stock-based compensation
The Company uses the fair value method to account for stock-
based transactions with employees and directors.
Compensation expense is determined using the Black-Scholes
option valuation model for incentive stock options.
Compensation expense for the share incentive program is
determined based on the fair value of the benefit conferred on
the employee (See Note 6). The amount of compensation
expense is recognized over the vesting period with a
corresponding increase to contributed surplus. On the exercise
of stock options for shares, the contributed surplus previously
recorded with respect to the exercised options and the
consideration paid is credited to capital stock.

Variable interest entities
Hedge funds set up as limited partnerships, public mutual
funds and offshore funds managed by SAM LP qualify as
variable interest entities (‘‘VIEs’’). The Company has adopted
the requirements of the CICA Handbook Accounting
Guideline 15, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities
(‘‘AcG-15’’). AcG-15 defines a VIE as an entity which either
does not have sufficient equity at risk to finance its activities
without additional subordinated financial support or where
the holders of the equity at risk lack the characteristics of a

controlling financial interest. The primary beneficiary is
defined as the entity that is exposed to a majority of the VIE’s
expected losses or is entitled to a majority of the VIE’s
expected residual returns. The primary beneficiary is required
to consolidate the VIE. The Company has determined that it
does not meet the definition of primary beneficiary in respect
of the hedge funds set up as limited partnerships nor of the
public mutual funds or the offshore funds that it manages.

Intangible assets
During 2010, the Company adopted a policy for intangible
assets as a result of transactions completed in 2010. The costs
incurred to create management services contracts between
SAM LP and certain of the funds managed by SAM LP are
recognized as intangible assets with an indefinite life and are
not amortized but are subject to an impairment review at least
annually and, if impaired, written down to fair value.

Deferred sales commissions
Sales commissions paid on the sale of mutual fund securities
are recorded at cost and amortized on a straight-line basis over
a maximum of three years. Unamortized deferred sales
commissions are written down to the extent that the carrying
value exceeds the expected future revenue on an undiscounted
basis.

Adoption of new accounting standards
Effective December 31, 2010, the Company has elected early
adoption as of January 1, 2010 the CICA Handbook
Section 1582, Business Combinations (‘‘Section 1582’’),
Section 1601, Consolidated Financial Statements
(‘‘Section 1601’’) and Section 1602, Non-Controlling Interest
(‘‘Section 1602’’). These Handbook sections are substantially
converged with International Financial Reporting Standards
(‘‘IFRS’’). In accordance with the transitional provisions, these
Handbook sections were applied on a prospective basis, from
January 1, 2010 with the exception of the presentation and
disclosure requirements for non-controlling interests which
were applied retrospectively. As a result of the adoption of
these Handbook sections, there was no material impact on the
Company’s consolidated financial statements.

(i) Business Combinations
Section 1582 retained the fundamental requirements of
previous guidance to identify an acquirer, to use the
acquisition method of accounting for each business
combination and requires that identifiable assets acquired,
liabilities assumed and consideration transferred, including
contingent consideration, be measured at fair value. Goodwill

45
27

is the difference between the fair value of consideration
transferred and the fair value of the net assets acquired.
Subsequent changes in the fair value of contingent
consideration accounted for as a financial liability and any
future adjustments to income tax estimates are recorded in net
income. Share consideration issued by the acquirer is measured
at fair value at the acquisition date and the acquirer is required
to expense acquisition-related costs as incurred. A
non-controlling interest may be measured at fair value or at
the proportionate share of the carrying value of the acquiree.

(ii) Consolidated Financial Statements
Section 1601 carried forward existing guidance on aspects of
the preparation of consolidated financial statements
subsequent to the acquisition date other than those pertaining
to a non-controlling interest.

(iii) Non-Controlling Interest
Section 1602 provides guidance on the treatment of a
non-controlling interest after acquisition in a business
combination and requires: a non-controlling interest to be
presented clearly in equity, but separately from equity
attributed to shareholders of the Company; the amount of
consolidated net income and other comprehensive income
attributed to shareholders of the Company and to a
non-controlling interest to be clearly identified and presented
on the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive
income retrospectively; and changes in ownership interests of a
subsidiary that do not result in a loss or acquisition of control
to be accounted for as an equity transaction.

Future changes in accounting policies

International Financial Reporting Standards
AcSB has confirmed that the use of IFRS will be required
commencing 2011 for publicly accountable, profit oriented
enterprises. IFRS will replace current Canadian GAAP
followed by the Company. The Company will be required to
begin reporting under IFRS for its fiscal year ended
December 31, 2011 and will be required to provide
information that conforms with IFRS for the comparative

periods presented. Management implemented an IFRS
changeover plan and completed its preliminary analysis of
transition impacts in 2009.

In 2010, the Company continued monitoring new standards

and amendments to existing IFRS standards and concluded
there are no new standards or amendments to existing IFRS
standards that will alter the previous guidance issued by the
Company for its upcoming first quarterly report under IFRS.

3. Proprietary Investments
Proprietary investments consist of the following
($ in thousands):

Years  ended  December 31

Gold bullion

Silver bullion

Public equities and share
purchase warrants

Mutual funds and hedge funds

Secured note receivable

Private equities

Total proprietary investments

2010

7,931

6,788

21,387

4,627

–

1,151

41,884

2009

6,435

–

4,674

831

14,338

1,726

28,004

As at December 31, 2010, investments in public equities and

share purchase warrants consisted primarily of companies in
the resource sector. These investments include $15.7 million in
common shares of Sprott Resource Lending Corp. (formerly
Quest Capital Corp.), a public company listed on the TSX and
NYSE Amex that is managed by a subsidiary of SCLP under a
management services agreement.

Investments in mutual funds and hedge funds consisted

entirely of investments in mutual funds and hedge funds
managed by SAM LP.

On December 31, 2010, the secured note receivable was
redeemed by the Company for 110% of its face value as per
the Note Indenture pursuant to a change of control of the
issuer. In 2010, the Company earned $1.5 million (2009 –
$0.9 million) of interest income from this secured note.

2846

Sprott Inc. Annual Report 2010
Sprott Inc. Annual Report 2010

reporting period. Based on our assessment, we determined that
no impairment exists.

6. Shareholders’ Equity
(a) Capital stock and contributed surplus
The authorized capital of the Company consists of an
unlimited number of common shares, without par value.

4. Property and Equipment
Property and equipment consist of the following
($ in thousands):

Artwork

Furniture  and
equipment

Computer  hardware
and  software

Leasehold
improvements

Artwork

Furniture  and
equipment

Computer  hardware
and  software

Leasehold
improvements

December 31,  2010

Accumulated
amortization

Net
book
value

–

1,691

Cost

1,691

1,751

1,346

405

Issued

1,154

1,061

93

Balance, December 31,
2008, 2009 and 2010

Number  of
shares

Stated  value
($  in  thousands)

150,000,000

40,105

3,105

7,701

1,589

3,996

1,516

3,705

Contributed surplus consists of the following:

(i) stock option expense, and

(ii) share incentive program expense.

December 31,  2009

Accumulated
amortization

Net
book
value

–

1,691

Balance, December 31, 2008

Cost

1,691

1,739

1,077

662

Expensing of fair value of
2,550,000 Sprott Inc. stock options over the
vesting period

1,039

1,016

23

Balance, December 31, 2009

3,068

7,537

1,146

3,239

1,922

4,298

Expensing of fair value of
2,650,000 Sprott Inc. stock options over the
vesting period

Expensing of share incentive program

Balance, December 31, 2010

Stated  value
($  in  thousands)

1,524

2,296

3,820

2,294

25,707

31,821

5.  Other  Long-Term  Assets
Other  long-term  assets  consist  of  the  following
($  in  thousands):

December 31,
2010

December 31,
2009

Intangible assets

1,369

Deferred sales commissions,
net of accumulated
amortization of $180
(2009 – $4)

832

2,201

–

94

94

The intangible assets relate to certain costs incurred to
create management services contracts between SAM LP and
certain funds managed by SAM LP. The intangible assets have
indefinite useful lives and are assessed for impairment at each

(b) Stock option plan and share incentive program
Stock option plan
On April 3, 2008, the Company adopted an option plan
(the ‘‘Plan’’) to provide incentives to directors, officers,
employees and consultants of the Company and its wholly-
owned subsidiaries. The aggregate number of shares issuable
upon the exercise of all options granted under the Plan shall
not exceed 10% of the issued and outstanding shares of the
Company as at the date of grant of each option under the Plan.
The options may be granted at a price that is not less than the
market price of the Company’s common shares at the time of
the grant. The options vest annually over a three-year period
and may be exercised during a period not to exceed 10 years
from the date of grant.

The details of option grants are as follows:

47
29

Date

Date of grant:
May 6, 2008

Date of grant:
June 2, 2008

Date of cancellation:
January 8, 2010

Date of grant:
January 15, 2010

Date of grant:
November 9, 2010

Number
of  options

Fair
market
value

Exercise
price

Expiry
date

Inputs  used  to  calculate  fair  value

2,450,000

$ 2.71

$

10

May 6, 2018 Risk-free interest rate of 3.05%,

expected life of 5 years,
weighted average volatility of
28% and expected dividend
yield of 1%

100,000

$ 2.49

$ 9.06

June 2, 2018 Risk-free interest rate of 3.27%,

expected life of 5 years,
weighted average volatility of
28% and expected dividend
yield of 1%

(100,000)

$ 2.49

$ 9.06

50,000

$ 3.27

$ 4.85

January 15, 2020 Risk-free interest rate of 2.35%,

expected life of 5 years,
weighted average volatility of
40% and expected dividend
yield of 2.06%

150,000

$ 2.06

$ 6.60

November 9, 2020 Risk-free interest rate of 1.57%,

expected life of 5 years,
weighted average volatility of
40% and expected dividend
yield of 1.80%

As at December 31,
2010

2,650,000

As at December 31, 2010, of the 2,650,000 option granted,

1,633,333 options were exercisable and 1,016,667 had
not vested.

Share incentive program
In September 2010, Eric Sprott, Chairman of the Company,
personally funded a share incentive program through his
personal holding company (‘‘Holdco’’). The program provided
the Company’s new Chief Executive Officer and the
Company’s President (together, the ‘‘Executives’’) with a total
of 8 million common shares (the ‘‘Shares’’) of the Company.
This arrangement did not result in the issuance of shares from
the treasury of the Company.

In accordance with CICA Handbook Section 3870, Stock-
based Compensation and Other Stock-based Payments, this
transaction is considered stock-based compensation expense of
the Company and recorded as an offset to contributed surplus
to reflect the capital contribution made by Holdco. Total
shareholders’ equity of the Company was unaffected. The
transaction was valued at $25.7 million reflecting the
maximum benefit conferred to the Executives as a result of the

arrangement and has been fully expensed in these consolidated
financial statements with a corresponding increase to
contributed surplus. The Shares are freely tradable and carry
no restrictions.

For the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company

recorded for share-based compensation, compensation
expense of $28.0 million in aggregate (2009 – $2.3 million),
with a corresponding increase to contributed surplus. Of the
$28.0 million compensation expense, $25.7 million (2009 –
$nil) relates to the share incentive program and the remaining
$2.3 million (2009 – $2.3 million) to the stock option plan.

(c) Objectives of managing capital
The Company’s objectives when managing capital are:
• To meet regulatory requirements and other contractual

obligations;

• To safeguard the Company’s ability to continue as a going

concern so that it can continue to provide returns for
shareholders;

• To provide financial flexibility to fund possible acquisitions;

3048

Sprott Inc. Annual Report 2010
Sprott Inc. Annual Report 2010

• To provide adequate seed capital for the Company’s new

The Company entered into a revolving term credit facility

product offerings; and,

• To provide an adequate return to shareholders through the

growth in assets under management and growth in
management fees and incentive fees that will result in
dividend payments to shareholders.
The Company’s capital is comprised of equity, including

capital stock, contributed surplus and retained earnings.
SPW LP is a member of the IIROC and SAM LP is a registrant
of the OSC; as a result, both limited partnerships are required
to maintain a minimum level of regulatory capital. To ensure
compliance, senior management monitors regulatory and
working capital on a regular basis. As at December 31, 2010,
SPW LP and SAM LP were in compliance with their respective
capital requirements.

with a Canadian chartered bank in the amount of up to
$50 million subsequent to the year end (see Note 16).

In the normal course of business, the Company, through its
limited partnerships and wholly-owned subsidiaries, generates
adequate operating cash flow and has limited capital
requirements.

The Company may adjust its capital levels in light of

changes in business-specific circumstances as well as overall
economic conditions.

7. Financial Instruments
Financial instruments are classified based on categories
according to CICA Handbook ‘‘Section 3855, Financial
Instruments – Recognition and Measurement’’ as follows
($ in thousands):

Carrying  Amount  on  Balance  Sheet

December 31,  2010

Cash  and  cash  equivalents

Proprietary  investments

Fees  receivable

Other  assets

Total  financial  assets

Accounts  payable  and  accrued  liabilities

Compensation  and  employee  bonuses  payable

Total  financial  liabilities

December 31,  2009

Cash  and  cash  equivalents

Proprietary  investments

Fees  receivable

Other  assets

Total  financial  assets

Accounts  payable  and  accrued  liabilities

Compensation  and  employee  bonuses  payable

Total  financial  liabilities

Fair  Value

Available  for
Sale

–

1,183

–

–

Amortized
Cost

Loans  and
Receivables  and
Other  Financial
Liabilities

–

–

209,078

2,025

Held  for
Trading

81,209

25,982

–

–

1,183

107,191

211,103

–

–

–

–

–

–

17,010

61,644

78,654

Carrying  Amount  on  Balance  Sheet

Fair  Value

Available  for
Sale

–

1,819

–

–

Held  for
Trading

49,010

5,412

–

–

1,819

54,422

–

–

–

–

–

–

Amortized
Cost

Loans  and
Receivables  and
Other  Financial
Liabilities

–

14,338

12,751

2,248

29,337

4,546

9,192

13,738

49
31

Proprietary  investments  classified  as  available  for  sale

consisted  of  an  investment  in  common  stock  of  a
private  company  in  the  gold  and  precious  minerals
sector  presented  at  cost  less  impairment,  if any.

Proprietary  investments  classified  as  held  for  trading

consisted  entirely  of  public  equities,  share  purchase
warrants  and  investments  in  mutual  funds  and  hedge
funds  managed  by  SAM LP.

Fair  value  hierarchy

Financial  instruments  carried  at  fair  value
The  financial  instruments  carried  at  fair  value  have
been  categorized  under  three  levels  of  the  fair  value
hierarchy  as follows:

Quoted  prices  (unadjusted)  in  an  active  market  for
Identical  assets  (Level 1)
This  level  of  the  hierarchy  includes  listed  securities  on
major  exchanges,  including  the  TSX  and  TSX  Venture
Exchange,  investments  in  redeemable  mutual  funds  and

highly  liquid  temporary  deposits  with  Canadian  banks.
The  fair  value  of  instruments  that  are  quoted  in  active
markets  are  determined  using  the  quoted  prices  where
they  represent  those  at  which  regularly  and  recently
occurring  transactions  take place.

Inputs  other  than  quoted  prices  included  in  Level 1
that  are  observable  for  the  asset  either  directly  or
indirectly  (Level 2)
This  level  of  the  hierarchy  includes  common  shares
traded  in  over-the-counter  markets,  warrants  valued
using  observable  inputs  and  investments  in  hedge funds.

Inputs  for  the  asset  that  are  not  based  on  observable
market  data  (Level 3)
As  at  December 31,  2010,  the  Company  does  not  have
any  financial  instruments  that  are  measured  at  fair
value  and  are  classified  as  Level 3.

The  following  tables  classify  the  carrying  value  of  the

financial  instruments  held  at  fair  value  across  the  fair
value  hierarchy  (in $ thousands):

December 31,  2010

Cash  and  cash  equivalents

Public  equities

Common  share  purchase  warrants

Mutual  funds

Hedge  funds

Total

($  thousands)
December 31,  2009

Cash  and  cash  equivalents

Public  equities

Common  share  purchase  warrants

Mutual  funds

Hedge  funds

Total

Financial  instruments  at  fair  value

Level 1

Level 2

Total

81,209

1,906

–

1,950

–

85,065

–

15,894

3,587

–

2,677

22,158

81,209

17,800

3,587

1,950

2,677

107,223

Financial  instruments  at  fair  value

Level 1

Level 2

Total

49,010

1,440

–

503

–

50,953

–

1,444

1,790

–

328

3,562

49,010

2,884

1,790

503

328

54,515

During  the  year  ended  December 31,  2010  and
December 31,  2009,  the  Company  did  not  hold  any
Level 3  financial  instruments  and  there  were  no

significant  transfers  between  Level 1  and  Level 2  of  the
fair  value  hierarchy.

3250

Sprott Inc. Annual Report 2010
Sprott Inc. Annual Report 2010

At  December 31,  2010,  public  equities  included
$15.7 million  in  common  shares  of  Sprott  Resource
Lending  Corp  (formerly  Quest  Capital  Corp.)  that  were
restricted  as  at  December 31,  2010  and  became  freely
trading  effective  January 7,  2011  and  were  transferred
from  Level 2  to  Level 1  at  that time.

Financial  instruments  not  carried  at  fair  value
For  fees  receivable,  other  assets,  accounts  payable  and
accrued  liabilities  and  compensation  and  employee
bonuses  payable,  the  carrying  amount  represents  a
reasonable  approximation  of  fair  value  due  to  their
short  term nature.

Precious  metal  bullion  forms  part  of  proprietary
investments  as  detailed  in  Note 3  to the  consolidated
financial  statements.  Under  Canadian  GAAP,  precious
metal  bullion  is  not  considered  a  financial  instrument
and  is  not  included  in  the  above analyses.

8.  Related  Party  Transactions
(a)  Artwork  rental
Historically,  the  Company  rented  artwork  from
Mr. Sprott,  Chairman  of  the  Company,  as  well  as  from
Sprott  Securities Ltd.,  a  corporation  wholly-owned  by
Mr. Sprott.  The  rental  rate  was  equal  to  3%  per  annum
of  the  amount  paid  to  acquire  the  artwork  displayed  in
the  office  area  of  the  Company.  Commencing  in
May 2009,  these  artwork  rental  contracts  were
cancelled.  As  a  result,  there  were  no  artwork  rental
fees  incurred  for  the  year  ended  December 31,  2010.
For  the  year  ended  December 31,  2009,  the  Company
incurred  an  expense  of  $0.3 million  in  artwork  rental
fees  to  Mr. Sprott  and  Sprott  Securities Ltd.

(b)  Purchase  of  proprietary  investments  from
Sprott  Strategic  Gold  Master  Fund Ltd.
In  January 2009,  the  Company  purchased  certain
portfolio  investments  from  Sprott  Strategic  Gold
Master  Fund Ltd.,  pursuant  to  the  compulsory
redemption  of  all  the  holders  of  that  fund.  Some  of
those  investments  were  investments  in  private
companies  for  which  there  was  no  active  market.  Those

investments  were  purchased  for  $1.8 million,  were
classified  as  available  for  sale  and  recorded  at  cost  less
any  permanent  impairment.  Some  of  those  investments
have  subsequently  started  trading  in  a  public  market
and  were  disposed  of  by  the  Company.  As  a  result,  as
at  December 31,  2010,  the  Company  continues  to  hold
one  such  investment.

(c)  Share  incentive  program
In  September 2010,  Eric  Sprott,  Chairman  of  the
Company,  personally  funded  a  share  incentive  program
through  Holdco.  The  program  provided  the  Executives
with  a  total  of  8 million  common  shares  of  the
Company.  This  arrangement  did  not  result  in  the
issuance  of  common  shares  from  the  treasury  of  the
Company.  See  Note 6,  Shareholders’  Equity  for
additional  information.

9.  Commitments
Lease  commitments
Future  minimum  annual  rental  payments  under  a
non-cancellable  lease  which  expires  on  December 31,
2013  for  office  premises,  including  operating  costs,  are
as follows:

2011

2012

2013

($  in  thousands)

2,388

2,388

2,388

7,164

10. Earnings Per Share
For the year ended December 31, 2010, basic and diluted
earnings per common share were $0.87. For the year ended
December 31, 2009, basic and diluted earnings per common
share were $0.21. Earnings per share are calculated using the
weighted average number of shares outstanding during the
relevant periods. For the years ended December 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, the weighted average number of shares
outstanding was 150,000,000.

51
33

11. Income Taxes
The reconciliation of the Company’s effective tax rate to the
statutory tax rate is as follows ($ in thousands):

Future income tax asset and future income tax liability

relate to the following ($ in thousands):

Year  ended
December 31,
2010

Income taxes at statutory tax rate (28.42%)

49,174

Decrease in income taxes resulting from:

Non-taxable stock-based compensation

7,958

Non-taxable portion of capital gains and
unrealized gains

Non-taxable foreign affiliate income

Rate differences and other

Income tax provision as reported (effective tax
rate of 24.16%)

(12,225)

(2,129)

(983)

41,795

Year  ended
December 31,
2009

Income taxes at statutory tax rate (31.25%)

14,113

Decrease in income taxes resulting from:

Non-taxable portion of capital gains

Rate differences and other

Income tax provision as reported (effective tax
rate of 29.5%)

(760)

(21)

13,332

The components of income tax expense are as follows

($ in thousands):

Year  ended
December 31,
2010

Year  ended
December 31,
2009

Current income tax expense

Future income tax expense

Provision for income taxes

41,165

630

41,795

12,647

685

13,332

Foreign accrual property
losses and capital losses

Other

Future income tax asset

Unrealized capital gains

Intangible assets and
deferred sales charges

Future income tax liability

Year  ended
December 31,
2010

Year  ended
December 31,
2009

1,935

–

1,935

(1,217)

(552)

(1,769)

1,260

29

1,289

(493)

–

(493)

As at December 31, 2010, the future income tax asset in the

amount of $1.9 million related entirely to foreign accrual
property losses and capital losses. The future income tax
liability of $1.8 million relates to future taxes associated with
unrealized gains as well as certain items which are deductible
for income tax purposes, but capitalized for accounting
purposes. As at December 31, 2010, the Company had
approximately $6.7 million of unused capital losses realized
on the disposition of a subsidiary by means of a
dividend-in-kind and do not expire.

12. Variable Interest Entities
Certain hedge funds and offshore funds are structured as
limited partnerships in which the Company, through its
subsidiary entities, holds general partner interests in the
partnerships, which entitle the Company to participate in a
portion of the carried interest of the partnerships. Some of the
offshore funds managed by the Company structured as
corporations and public mutual funds managed by the
Company have shareholders or unitholders whose ownership,
although substantial, lacks the characteristics of a controlling
financial interest. The Company has a direct investment in
several such offshore funds and in certain public mutual funds.
Management has concluded that the Company is not the
primary beneficiary of these funds and, thus, is not required to
consolidate these entities. The Company has no other
significant interests in VIEs. The Company’s maximum
exposure to loss as a result of its involvement with VIEs is a
function of the amounts invested in the funds, management
fees and performance fees. 

3452

Sprott Inc. Annual Report 2010
Sprott Inc. Annual Report 2010

13. Risk Management Activities
Financial instruments present a number of specific risks as
identified below:

management refer to the total net assets of Sprott funds and
managed accounts, on which management fees and
performance fees are calculated.

(a) Market risk
Market risk refers to the risk that a change in the level of one
or more of market prices, interest rates, foreign exchange
rates, indices, volatilities, correlations or other market factors,
such as liquidity, will result in a change in the fair value of a
financial instrument. The Company’s financial instruments are
classified as held for trading, available for sale or loans and
receivables and measured either at fair value or cost less
permanent impairment, if any. Therefore, changes in fair value
or permanent impairment, if any, affect reported earnings as
they occur. The maximum risk resulting from financial
instruments is determined by the fair value of the financial
instruments classified as held for trading and cost less
permanent impairment, if any, for investments classified as
available for sale or loans and receivables. The Company
manages market risk by regular monitoring of its proprietary
investments.

The Company separates market risk into three categories:

price risk, interest rate risk and foreign exchange risk.

Price risk
Price risk arises from the possibility that changes in the price of
the Company’s proprietary investments will result in changes
in carrying value. For more details about the Company’s
proprietary investments, refer to Note 3.

If the market values of proprietary investments that are held

for trading increased by 5%, with all other variables held
constant and before income taxes, this would have increased
income before income taxes by approximately $1.3 million
(December 31, 2009 – $0.3 million); conversely, if the value of
proprietary investments decreased by 5%, this would have
decreased income before income taxes by the same amount.
If the market value of gold and silver bullion increased by
5%, with all other variables held constant and before income
taxes, this would have increased income before income taxes
by approximately $0.7 million (December 31, 2009 –
$0.3 million); conversely, if the value of gold and silver bullion
decreased by 5%, this would have decreased income before
income taxes by the same amount.

The Company’s revenues are also exposed to price risk since

both management fees and performance fees are correlated
with assets under management, which fluctuates with changes
in the market values of the assets in the funds and managed
accounts managed by SAM LP and SCLP. Assets under

Interest rate risk
Interest rate risk arises from the possibility that changes in
interest rates will affect the value of financial instruments. The
Company does not hedge its exposure to interest rate risk as
such risk is minimal. As part of its cash management program,
the Company primarily invests in short-term debt securities
issued by the Government of Canada with maturities of less
than three months.

In the second quarter of 2009, the Company, through its

wholly-owned subsidiary, SAMGENPAR Ltd., invested
approximately $14 million in a secured note bearing an
interest rate of 10% per annum and secured against the assets
of the issuer. On December 31, 2010, this secured note was
redeemed by the Company for 110% of its face value pursuant
to a change of control of the issuer.

Foreign exchange risk
Foreign exchange risk arises from the possibility that changes
in the price of foreign currencies will result in changes in
carrying value. The Company holds assets denominated in
currencies other than the Canadian dollar. It is therefore
exposed to currency risk, as the value of investments
denominated in other currencies will fluctuate due to changes
in exchange rates. The Company does not enter into currency
hedging transactions.

As at December 31, 2010, approximately $15.6 million or

4.6% (2009 – $8.0 million or 8.2%) of total assets was
invested in proprietary investments held for trading and
precious metal bullion priced in U.S. dollars (‘‘USD’’).
Furthermore, a total of $1.2 million (2009 – $0.5 million) of
cash, $50.8 million (2009 – $7.6 million) of accounts
receivable and $0.1 million (2009 – $0.2 million) of other
assets were denominated in USD. As at December 31, 2010,
had the exchange rate between the USD and the Canadian
dollar increased or decreased by 5% (relative to the Canadian
dollar), with all other variables held constant and before
income taxes, the increase or decrease, respectively, in income
before income taxes would have amounted to approximately
$3.4 million (2009 – $0.8 million).

(b) Credit risk
Credit risk arises from the potential that counterparties will
fail to satisfy their obligations as they come due. The Company
incurs credit risk when entering into, settling and financing
various proprietary transactions. As at December 31, 2010,

53
35

the Company’s most significant counterparty is Cormark, the
carrying broker of SPW LP, which also acts as a custodian for
most of the Company’s proprietary investments. Cormark is
registered as an investment dealer subject to regulation by the
IIROC; as a result, it is required to maintain minimal levels of
regulatory capital at all times.

Credit risk is also managed by dealing with counterparties
that the Company believes to be creditworthy and by actively
monitoring credit exposure and the financial health of the
counterparties. The majority of accounts receivable relate to
management and performance fees receivable from the funds
and managed accounts managed by the Company.

(c) Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company cannot meet a
demand for cash or fund its obligations as they come due. The
Company’s exposure to liquidity risk is minimal as it
maintains sufficient levels of liquid assets to meet its
obligations as they come due. As at December 31, 2010, the
Company had $81.2 million or 23.7% of its total assets in
cash and cash equivalents. The majority of current assets
reflected on the consolidated balance sheets are highly liquid.
Approximately $16.6 million or 39.7% of proprietary
investments held by the Company are readily marketable and
are recorded at their fair value. Financial liabilities, including
accounts payable and accrued liabilities and compensation and
employee bonuses payable, are short-term in nature and are
generally due within a year. The Company’s management is
responsible for reviewing liquidity resources to ensure funds
are readily available to meet its financial obligations as they
come due, as well as ensuring adequate funds exist to support
business strategies and operations growth. The Company
manages liquidity risk by monitoring cash balances on a
daily basis.

14. Segmented Information
Management has determined that the Company’s dominant
industry segment is investment management services in
Canada. Substantially all of the Company’s assets are located
in Canada.

15. Contingent Liabilities
In the normal course of operations, former employees may
from time to time file claims for additional compensation. The
Company is currently defending itself against such claims. The
Company has provided for the settlement of these claims, the
amount of which is immaterial to these consolidated financial
statements.

16. Subsequent Events
(a) Dividend
Following receipt of performance fees for the year ended
December 31, 2010 and the completion of these audited

3654

consolidated financial statements, the Company’s Board of
Directors declared a special dividend of $0.60 per common
share in January 2011 and a second special dividend of $0.12
per common share was declared in March 2011. The special
dividend of $0.60 per common share was paid on
February 3, 2011.

In March 2011, a dividend of $0.03 per common share was

declared for the quarter ended December 31, 2010.
(b) Acquisition of Rule Investments Inc., Global
Resource Investments Ltd., Terra Resource
Investment Management Inc. and Resource Capital
Investments Corp. (the ‘‘Global Companies’’)
On February 4, 2011, the Company acquired all of the
outstanding common shares of the Global Companies. The
Company has acquired the Global Companies because it is
expected to provide benefits across the Company and
throughout the Global Companies through the sharing of
intellectual capital, the development of new products, and by
leveraging the Company’s products and brands in the
United States and internationally.

As consideration, the Company issued 19,467,500 common
shares from treasury valued at $168.8 million, excluding costs.
The common shares of the Company issued as consideration
were valued at $8.67 per share using the closing price of the
Company’s common shares on February 4, 2011. An
additional 532,500 common shares of the Company will be
provided to employees of the Global Companies after closing.
In addition, the seller and certain current and future employees
of the Global Companies will be eligible to earn up to an
additional 8 million common shares of the Company with the
achievement of certain financial targets by the Global
Companies over a period of up to five years.

The allocation of the purchase price will be completed in
fiscal 2011 after the Company finalizes its valuation of the
acquired identifiable intangible assets.

(c) Line of credit
In February 2011, the Company established a revolving term
credit facility (‘‘Credit Facility’’) with a Canadian chartered
bank in the amount of $50 million. The Credit Facility is
secured by a general security agreement. The Company is able
to draw down on the Credit Facility by way of demand
indebtedness with interest based either on the bank’s prime
rate or banker’s acceptances.

17. Comparative Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements
The comparative consolidated financial statements have been
reclassified from statements previously presented to conform
to the current year’s presentation. 

Sprott Inc. Annual Report 2010
Sprott Inc. Annual Report 2010

UNAUDITED  CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENTS  OF  INCOME,
COMPREHENSIVE  INCOME  AND  RETAINED  EARNINGS

For  the  three  months  ended  December 31  ($  in  thousands,  except  for  per  share  amounts)

Revenue
Management fees

Performance fees

Unrealized and realized gains on proprietary investments

Commissions

Other income

Total revenue

Expenses
Compensation and benefits

Stock-based compensation

Trailer fees

General and administrative

Donations

Amortization

Total expenses

Income before income taxes for the period

Provision for income taxes

Net income and comprehensive income for the period

Retained earnings, beginning of the period

Dividends declared

Retained earnings, end of the period

2010
$

2009
$

31,534

199,139

5,450

2,841

2,925

23,052

10,614

1,465

24

591

241,889

35,746

61,515

26,300

6,337

5,249

1,580

280

101,261

140,628

32,596

108,032

38,165

(4,500)

141,697

8,695

574

5,099

2,289

282

356

17,295

18,451

5,138

13,313

22,652

(3,750)

32,215

Basic and diluted earnings per share

$

0.72

$

0.09

55
37

UNAUDITED  CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENTS  OF  CASH  FLOWS

For  the  three  months  ended  December 31  ($  in  thousands)

Operating Activities
Net income for the period

Add (deduct) non-cash items:

Unrealized and realized gains on proprietary investments

Stock-based compensation

Amortization of property and equipment

Amortization of deferred sales commissions

Future income taxes

Other items

Fees receivable

Other assets

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

Compensation and employee bonuses payable

Income taxes payable

Cash provided by operating activities

Investing Activities
Purchase of proprietary investments

Sale of proprietary investments

Purchase of property and equipment

Deferred sales commissions paid

Other long-term assets

Cash provided by investing activities

Financing Activities
Dividends paid

Cash used in financing activities

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents during the period

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the period

Cash and cash equivalents, end of the period

Cash and cash equivalents:

Cash

Short-term deposits

Supplemental cash flow information

Income taxes paid

Interest paid

3856

2010
$

2009
$

108,032

13,313

(5,450)

26,300

206

74

(547)

(516)

(1,465)

574

352

4

584

(64)

128,099

13,298

(204,862)

85

11,854

53,074

32,640

20,890

(2,000)

14,474

(55)

(369)

(1)

12,049

(4,500)

(4,500)

28,439

52,770

81,209

15,341

65,868

81,209

(9,261)

148

(605)

1,143

4,532

9,255

(89)

752

(244)

(98)

–

321

(3,750)

(3,750)

5,826

43,184

49,010

17,223

31,787

49,010

498

–

48

–

Sprott Inc. Annual Report 2010

Auditors 
Ernst & Young LLP 
Ernst & Young Tower 
P.O. Box 251, 222 Bay Street 
Toronto-Dominion Centre 
Toronto, Ontario  M5K 1J7

Investor Relations 
Shareholder requests may be directed to Investor 
Relations by e-mail at ir@sprott.com or via telephone at 
416.203.2310 or toll free at 1.877.403.2310

Stock Information 
Sprott Inc. common shares are traded on the Toronto Stock 
Exchange under the symbol “SII”

Annual Meeting 
June 2, 2011 at 4:00 pm EDT 
The Design Exchange  
234 Bay Street  
Toronto ON  M5K 1B2 

CORPORATE INFORMATION

Head Office 
Sprott Inc. 
Royal Bank Plaza, South Tower 
200 Bay Street 
Suite 2700, P.O. Box 27 
Toronto, Ontario  M5J 2J1 
Telephone: 416.362.7172 
Toll Free: 1.888.362.7172

Directors & Officers 
Eric S. Sprott, CEO & Chairman 
Peter Grosskopf, Chief Executive Officer 
Jack C. Lee, Lead Director 
Allan Jacobs, Director 
Mark McCain, Director 
James T. Roddy, Director 
Marc Faber, Director 
Kevin Bambrough, President 
Steven Rostowsky, Chief Financial Officer 
Arthur Einav, Corporate Secretary

Transfer Agent & Registrar 
Equity Transfer & Trust Company 
200 University Avenue, Suite 400 
Toronto, Ontario  M5H 4H1 
Toll Free: 1.866.393.4891 
www.equitytransfer.com

Legal Counsel 
Heenan Blaikie LLP 
2500-333 Bay Street 
Toronto, Ontario  M5H 2T4

57

www.sprottinc.com